Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVeronica Maxey- Structural LetterSubject: Proposed Solar Panel Installation Veronica Maxey Residence, 469 Grandey Way NE, Renton, WA To Whom it May Concern, Design Parameter Summary Governing Building Code: 2018 Washington Building Code (2018 IBC) Risk Category: II Design Wind Speed: 110 mph (per ASCE 7-16) Ground Snow Load: 20 psf Roof Information Roof Structure: 2x4 Manufactured Trusses @ 24" O.C. Roofing Material: Asphalt Shingles (1 layer) Roof Slope: 25 degrees Note: Required embedment length excludes the tapered tip of the screw, and embedment into sheathing. Roof Connection Details Our engineering department has reviewed information, gathered by our field crews, related to the proposed solar panel installation at the above-referenced address. The purpose of our review was to determine the structural adequacy of the existing roof. Based on our review and analysis of the available information, and in accordance with governing building codes, it is our professional opinion that the existing structure is permitted to remain unaltered for the proposed solar installation. Wind uplift on the panels has been calculated in accordance with the relevant provisions of ASCE 7-16. This loading has been used to verify the adequacy of the connection specified above. Connection locations should be in accordance with design drawings. Locations per design drawings November 14, 2022 Analysis The proposed installation complies with the requirements of WAC Section 51-51-03240 R324.4 (Exception) and is therefore deemed adequate to support the load of the rooftop solar system. RT Minis into 2x rafters or truss top chords at 48" O.C., install per design drawings and manufacturer specs Specifically: 1) the system is designed for the local wind speed; 2) the ground snow load does not exceed 70 psf; 3) the total dead load of all items is less than 4 psf (actual value is approximately2.73 psf); 4) Modules are not mounted more than 18" off the roof; and 5) Supports are installed such that the dead load is spread across roof- framing members and does not exceed 50 lbs at any point. Conclusion B22006057 RECEIVED 11/16/2022 lwalker BUILDING DIVISION Sincerely, Trevor A. Jones, P.E. Limitations and Disclaimers 11/14/2022 If you have any questions or concerns, please contact our office at (855)-709-1181, or email me directly at Trevor.Jones@solgenpower.com. Electrical engineering is beyond the scope of this analysis. Solar panels must be installed per manufacturer specifications. Structural design and analysis of the adequacy of solar panels, racks, mounts, rails, and other components is performed by each component's respective manufacturer and the undersigned makes no statement of opinion regarding such components. This letter and the opinions expressed herein are rendered solely for the benefit of the permitting authority (city or county building department), and may not be utilized or relied on by any other party. The opinion expressed in this letter is made in reliance on the following assumptions: the existing structure is in good condition; the existing structure is free from defects in design or workmanship; and the existing structure was code-compliant at the time of its design and construction. These assumptions have not been independently verified, and we have relied on representations made by the property owner and his or her agents with respect to the foregoing. The undersigned has not inspected the structure for patent or latent defects. The roof structure need not be altered for either gravity or lateral loading. Therefore, the existing structure is permitted to remain unaltered. Connections to the roof must be made per the "Roof Connection Details" section above. Copies of all relevant calculations are enclosed. B22006057 RECEIVED 11/16/2022 lwalker BUILDING DIVISION Note: All calculations per ASCE 7 Load Comparison Without Solar With Solar Dead Load Asphalt Shingles 3 3 psf 1/2" Plywood 1 1 psf Framing 3 3 psf Insulation 1 1 psf 1/2" Gypsum Ceiling 2 2 psf M,E, & Misc 1.5 1.5 psf Solar Panel 0 2.73 psf Total Dead Load 11.5 14.23 psf Snow Load Ground Snow Load, Pg psf Exposure Factor, Ce Thermal Factor, Ct Importance Factor, Is Flat Roof Snow Load Eqn. 7.3-1 or jurisdiction min. Slope degrees Unobstructed Slippery Surface?No No Slope Factor, Cs 1.00 1.00 Sloped Roof Snow Load 15.4 15.4 psf Live Load Roof Live Load 20 0 psf Load Combination D + Lr 31.5 14.2 psf D + S 26.9 29.6 psf Max. Load 31.5 29.6 psf % of original 94% Result: This calculation justifies the additional solar load by comparing existing to proposed gravity loads in the location of the solar panels. Because the total forces are decreased, per the relevant code provisions stated in the body of the letter, the existing roof structure is permitted to remain unaltered. 20 1.1 25 1 1 15.4 B22006057 RECEIVED 11/16/2022 lwalker BUILDING DIVISION RT Mini Connection Calculation Connection Demand Spacing perpendicular to rail 32.5 in 1/2 panel length Spacing parallel to rail 48 in Max spacing Effective Wind Area on each connection 10.8 ft2 Roof Angle 25 degrees Wind Speed 110 mph Exposure Coefficient, Kz 0.97 Topographic Factor, Kzt 1 Directionality Factor, Kd 0.85 Elevation Factor, Ke 1.00 Velocity Pressure, qz 25.4 psf Zone 1 Zone 2r Zone 3 GCp (max)1.90 1.97 1.97 Exposed Panels? (γE = 1.5)No No No Pressure Equalization Factor, γa 0.79 0.79 0.79 Uplift Force 37.9 39.5 39.5 psf Max. Uplift Force / Connection (1.0 WL)410.8 427.5 427.5 lbs ASD Factored (0.6 WL)246.5 256.5 256.5 lbs Solar Dead Load (0.6 DL)17.7 17.7 17.7 lbs Max. Uplift Force (0.6 WL - 0.6 DL)228.8 238.7 238.7 lbs Connection Capacity Connection Type RT Mini into 2x Rafter Total Allowable Capacity 447.0 lbs (per manufacturer) Compare ASD Factored Demand to Capacity Demand 238.7 lbs Capacity 447.0 lbs Result This calculation justifies the connection of the solar panels to existing roof members, by showing the connection capacity is equal to or greater than the uplift force demands. Capacity exceeds demands. Therefore, connection passes. B22006057 RECEIVED 11/16/2022 lwalker BUILDING DIVISION