No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA66-304 J t ` Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 4-18-66 IL.C4 COMMUNICATIONS; (cont.) V }\ Moved by Perry, seconded by Hulse, that the portion of the Planning Commission recommendation which states R-3, the portion in question, be changed, to R-2 and that the Council concur in the recommendation. Councilman Poli stated that R-2 was not requested by the property owner, he is requestint R-3. Councilwoman Dahlquist stated that the Planning Commission thought this property was usable as R-3 and the man who is applying or this has not requested R-2, and she did not feel the Council could take this upon themselves to make this change. The City Attorney advised that they could not do so unless the property owner concurs in this rezoning. As a matter of clarification the Mayor asked the City Attorney if this could be done if the property owner concurred. Mr. Shellan advised that the Council could not change it to R-4 as this is a more restrictive zoning, but that a change to R-2, a lesser use, could be made if the property owner concurred. A vote on the pending motion failed. Moved by Bruce, seconded by Perry, that the petition opposing the rezone be read. Carried. After the reading of the petitions Councilman Poli asked Mr. Riley if he would consent to set-back or an R-2 zoning, to which Mr. Riley answered, no. Poli again inquired if Mr. Riley would be willing to take a set-back, and he replied, yes, of 40 feet. Mr. Ames stated that he had contacted Mr. Riley to discuss this matter and that he had stated that he would not consider any R-2 zoning. Mr. Ames regretted that this may be unfair to this property owner, however, j he is onlyone and the objectingpetitioners are many. Mr. Ames felt that an R-3 zoning would put a balcony exposure to every back yard in the area and he would like to stop this movement. Moved by Bruce, seconded by Hulse, that the Council not concur in the recommendation of the Planning Commission and that the zoning be left -as it is for single family dwellings. Councilwoman Dahlquist expressed the opinion that the Council is making a grave mistake by not allowing the rezone to R-3 discounting the objections \ and recalling several million dollar assessed valuation lost by the -City in prior denials for apartment and multiple use rezones. Considerable discussion followed after which ;a vote was taken on the motion and dissenting voice vote brought request for roll call, which resulted as follows: AYE - Hulse, Bruce, Gianini, Perry, and Delaurenti, and i:i NO - Schellert, Dahlquist, Garrett, Trimm, and Poli. Mayor Custer cast his "Aye" vote i brea,:Lag the tie, and thereby denying the rezone. Ar•� The Recording Secretary read a letter from Arthur D. Scholes, P. E . , Chairman of the Traffic Advisory Commission wherein it was recommended that the City Council take immediate steps to restrict parking on Third Avenue from Rainier to Main Street, on Monday- through Friday, from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Moved by Trimm, seconded by Perry that this matter be referred to the Committee of the Whole. Carried. A ccmmunication from the Traffic Advisory Commission was read recommending that the Renton City Council expedite the following program to alleviate the traffic congestion which presently exists within the City of Renton: (1) Proposed Logan-Smithers extension the addition .of' an arterial access between Logan Street and Park Street in the vicinity of 6th Avenue North. This extension will require at-grade intersections at the forth and South terminus, (2) A major East-West arterial to commence at Rainier Avenue and Airport Way and terminate at Sunset Boulevard East and 3rd Avenue North. Grade separations at Rainier Avenue and Logan Street are considered essential for this portion of the program, and (3) The widening and improvement of Sunset Boulevard East from 116th Avenue Southeast to the Eastern City limits. In making this recommendation the Commission carefully considered the Renton Urban Area comprehensive plan provided by the Planning Commission in June of 1965. Councilman Hulse stated that he would like to present the Capital Improvement Priority Committee Report at this time as it had a direct bearing on the Traffic Advisory Commission's recommendation. The Recording Secretary read the report of the Capital Improvement Priority Committee wherein it was recommended that the Arterial Street projects consisting of Logan to Smithers connection and the 3rd Avenue N•)rth improvement, as presented at the Public Hearing meeting of April llth, be referred to the LAW AND ORDINANCE COMMITTEE for proper Ordinance to authorize bond issue to be submitted before the electorate on the November, 1966 ballot, and to refer this matter to Bonding Counsel. Moved by Schellert, seconded by Dahlquist that the Council concur with the recommendations of the Committee. Carried. The SecretaryRecording read a petition containing 15 signatories, starting with Mr. and Mrs. J. D. Stephenson and ending with Mr. and Mrs. Gordon Clark, requesting that a st.-::eet light be installed on the corner of S. E . 112th Street and 115th Avenue S. E., and street lights be extended north on 115th Avenue S. E . Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Poll, to refer this matter to the LIGHT AND POWER COMMITTEE to report back. Carried. PROCLAMATION: A Proclamation by Mayor Custer was read establishing the last week in April as Secretaries Week, and Wednesday, April 27, 1966, has been designated as Secretaries Day. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Bruce, that the Council concur in the Proclamation of the Mayor. Carried ! .:13 , . ,____Zt °� �,PR 1965 ''' .11 / , RECEPIED 5 cp CITY of RENTON l,1 r-CLERK'S OFFICE V ��E2 l `���6� April 18, 1966 Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council: Subject: The property submitted for rezone, located on Sunset Boulevard East, between M and 0 Streets Unfortunately, the efforts to come to an agreement failed due to the wide variety of the oppositions ' terms and the huge gap necessary to cover for both parties to reach an agreement. Maybe you've heard Renton called a lunch bucket town, - a town with a multi-million dollar weekly payroll earned but not spent here. This petition is our small effort to help correct this condition. This property has all the necessary physical attributes for apartment development, making it highly desirable for the rezone. Since we believe the ground in question speaks for itself inasmuch as it lies on a.major arterial, in a three block strip between two B-1 zonings; we, the property owners, would like the Council to vote on the petition for rezone in the same form it came from the Planning Commission -- with a unanimous vote of acceptance. Very truly yours, S ct i29-- / fo (Vi4 A/_ Minutes - Renton City Council Meeting 4-18-66 COMMUNICATIONS: (cont.) A communication from Leo A. Daly and Associates, relative to the Renton Airport Annex- - Apron 'TD", LAD Job No. 221565 and Boeing Project No. 360078, was read by the Recording Secretary. It was noted that Boeing is interested in leasing a portion of City property which lies on the easterly bank of the Cedar River Waterway, south of 6th Avenue North, described as being 81.5 feet by 882.4 feet. Because of security problems, the Boeing Company is desirous of constructing fences. across this strip of land which in turn would restrict the use of public land presently accessible to all. It was moved by Hulse, seconded by Poli, to refer this matter to the PROPERTY COMMITTEE to report back. Carried. The Recording Secretary read a letter from Planning Director Ericksen regarding a request from the Boeing Company for a permit to construct a fence on City street right of way on Garden Street. It was generally felt that the proposed fence does not involve any specific problems that would come under the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission. However, a permit to construct a fence or other structures on City street right of way should be on a revocable basis and subject to removal upon reasonable notice by the City, if the public interest would necessitate. Moved by Delaurenti, seconded by Dahlquist, that this matter be placed in the hands of the STREET AND ALLEY COMMITTEE to investigate and report back. Carried. A Witmunication from Merrick Hindes, Concession Chairman of the Green River District, Boy Scouts of America was read by the Recording Secretary, wherein they requested that a "no-fee" permit be issued to the Scout Commissioner Staff to allow the sale of hot dogs, hamburgers, pop, etc., at the Annual "Funforall" to be held at Liberty Park the weekend of May 21, 1966. Moved by Bruce, seconded by Hulse, that the permit be granted under the supervision of the Park Board. Carried. The Recording Secretary read a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Ray Charlton requesting that the rolls be reopened on the subject of L.I.D. 254, and stating that they had not been notified of the meeting of February 21, 1966 and were unable to protest or state their case at that time. The Charlton's stated that had they been heard they felt the Council would have ruled on their property as they did for Mr. Lavins property which lies under the same easement. Mayor Custer advised that this matter had been brought to the attention of the Council after the Assessment Roll had been approved and that the Council referred the matter to the Street and Alley Committee, who in turn requested the City Attorney to write to Mr. and Mrs. Charlton. It was noted that the City Attorney had written advising the Charitons that the final assessment roll had been duly approved on February 28, 1966 and inasmuch as no objections or protests were received in writing at or prior to the public hearing, such objections are then waived. The City Attorney advised that the assessments have been finalized and the City is legally in no position to make any adjustment or changes at this late stage, and read statutes confirming the legal procedure. Considerable discussion followed with Mrs. Charlton stating that they were not advised of the hearing in February and had been unable to attend the meeting in October, 1965, however, she stated that she had been advised on the telephone by the Engineering Department that easement property could not be charged for utilities as this is unusable property. The City Attorney was querried regarding the matter and stated that his only concern was whether or not the City Clerk had sent out the notice. The Recording Secretary advised that the notices were mailed and that the one to Mr. and Mrs. Charlton was not returned, therefor the Clerk's Office would have no way of knowing that they had not received this notice. Mrs. Charlton stated that she advised the Engineering Department by telephone of their new address and did not feel they should be penalized for an error made by City Hall. Mr. Shellan stated that under the law the City must send out notices to the name and address as listed on the rolls and this apparently has been done. Councilman Trimm asked for the recommendation of the Fire and Water Committee and Councilman Delaurenti stated that they were following the City Attorney's advice, and it would appear that no further action could be taken by the City. Councilman Perry inquired of the Recording Secretary how much notice is given on a public hearing and Mrs. Mead advised that it was 15 days. Mr. Charles Guy, father of Mrs. Charlton, spoke, advising that he felt he had no alternative other than to hire an attorney to take action against the City. At this time the Mayor advised that the Council has no other recourse, and the only alternative is for the Charlton's to take what action they feel is necessary. The Recording Secretary read a letter from Dorothy and Lyman Riley relative to their (// property under consideration for rezone, located on Sunset Bo1Ievard East, between M and 0 Streets. The Rileys stated that this property has all the necessary physical attributes for apartment development, making it highly desirable for the rezone, as it lies on a )\ major arterial, in a three block strip between two B-1 zonings; and therefor ask that the Council vote on the petition for rezone in the same form it came from the Planning Com- mission, with a unanimous vote of acceptance. It was noted that this matter had been tabled at the previous meeting. Moved by Perry, seconded by Schellert, that this matter \be taken from the table at this time. Carried. -3- r• APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE-IN..THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE ' USE ONLY Application No . : Sec . -Twp . -R. Date of filing : Area Map Planning Cod. 'Action:! �� � Kroll Page r' Date : �_ a _ G� Receipt No . '2/ City Council ' s Action Date : Ord. No . : APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY & ACCURATELY Name of Applicant LYMAN E. RILEY Address , 12435 SUNSET, BLVD. E. Telephone No . BA. 6-5367 Property Petitioned for rezoning is situated on SUNSET BLVD. E. Street , between "m" Street and a0a Street . . Legal Description of Subject Property That portion of the west half of the north east quarter of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 23 north, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said west half of the northeatt quarter of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter; thence south 88 04138" east 148.50 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north 029 '00" west 357 feet to the southerly line of Highway 189.71 feet; thence south 1 10100" west 339.72 feet; thence north 88 04138" west 165.20 feet to the true point of beginning. • • Existing Zoning Sly-1 Zoning Requested R-3 What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? 12 Apartment Units Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on this property? 18 Number Required 12 NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are con- sidered in reclassifying property. Evidence or addi- tional information you desire to submit to substan- • tiate your request may be attached to these sheets . 1. In what way is this proposed change in zoning in the public•_ interest? Higher Tax Value ' 2 . On what basis is there a real need in this community for more zoning of the type you request? Demand for housing far exceeds supply of good dwelling units. 3 . Do ybu:.consider;:theopropertylinvolve•d ih..thts' application" obe more suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone than for the uses per- mitted in the present classification? Please explain. If zoned R-3, it would be in keeping with other zonings on Sunset Blvd. 4 . What provision would you make to protect adjacent and surrounding prop- ertet from the detrimental effects of any uses permitted in the proposed zone? I would fi n-i sb fenninsr my property also nl ant everr•reen hedge Pt tY�P. Y1ark of mar nr�r 'iy i;C1 r,)rrte t nriZrae-r of S11rrouriF1ing nrrn r't �_ " A F F- I..D_ A V I. T. . I , �. / �� / /L being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the in- formation herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn to me this 13 day of 4 G� ,1960 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, (62 „--C„..L2- LEles r% ame ame o owner residing- at . � . �� �� 12435 Sunset Blvd. E, e e'q (Mailing address) `c;UTAFr u, � � Renton Washin ton L\BL\C = City . ... (hate) Ji%�c' ;3-0A 6-5367 Te ephone (OFFICE USE. ONLY) CERTIFICATION) This is to certify that the foregoing application has been in- spected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to form to the rules and regulations of : r� the Planning Depa >a ant. gover ,A., the filing of such application. C [in) 0 Date received 9196 Byo _. 6 W . Planning Commission Minutes 3/23/66 Page 4 2 . REZONES : Continued : ( 2) King County Hospital Dist. #1 (Cont . ) It was felt that the School District and the Park Board should be contacted and further study be made on this matter. ACTION: Moved by Cordell, seconded by Bardarson , that the hearing be continued until the April 13 meeting . Roll Call Vote being called, results were as follows : "Ayes" - Stredicke , Cordell, Bardarson, Sterling . "Nays" - Denzer, Teegarden, Racanello. Motion carried. ( 3) Lyman Riley, Appl. No. R-304-66 , from SR-1 to R-3 , property loca- ted on Sunset Boulevard E . between M Street and 0 Street. (a) Staff report : The Comprehensive Plan indicates this area for potential multiple residential use. The property is presently being used as single family residential. The adjacent uses are single family residential to the south and east. The property fronts on Sunset Highway and would be suitable for multiple fam- ily residential use. (b) Committee report : The area appears to be feasible for multiple family residential use and is recommended for approval. Chairman Garrison invited comments from the audience . Among.' pe rson$: ..,.ndthe audien,ee;,who voiced ofpj>egtions,ot,ost.he,-,proposed rezone. Qapl., Keever]; prgper,ty,,pw er,to, the so h( e.n u Mr. Lawrence Ss.vaige , 261;5.,, S,unset_; S,Iy0, E ,s They felt that the rezoning to multiple apartment use would be detrimental to prop- erty values , be an intrusion into the single family character of the neighborhood, and pos$ibly raise property taxes . Mr. Riley, the applicant , stated that he did not feel it would downgrade property in the area, nor would it cause any traffic hazard. Mr. Ericksen stated that in looking at this area it was felt that its best use would be for multiple family , since it fronts on Sunset Highway, but he suggested that proper screening be provided to protect single family residences adjacent to the proposed R-3 area. ACTION : Moved by Racanello , seconded by Denzer, that the hearing be closed. Motion carried. Moved by Racanello , seconded by Denzer, , to recommend to the City Council the rezone from SR-1 to R-3 , as it would be in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried. (4) Fifth West , Inc. Appl. No. R-298-66 , request for rezone from SR-1 to R-4 , property located on Benson Highway south of Puget Drive extending to 106th Ave. SE. (a) Staff report : The Comprehensive Plan indicates this area as suitable for multiple family residential use. The property is served by two major arterial streets and is adjacent to existing NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REG- ULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL, RENTON WASHINGTON, ON March 23 , , 1966 AT 8 : 00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR Rezone From SR-1 to R-3 FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY : 9 . Property located on Sunset Blvd. E between M St. and 0 St. : That portion of the W 1./2 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Sec. 4 , Twp. 23 N, R 5 E, W.M. , in King County, Washington described as follows : Beginning at the SW corner of said W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 ; thence S 88°04 ' 38" E 148 . 50 ' to the true, point of beg. ; thence N. 2°29 ' 00" W 357 ' to the southerly line of Highway 189 . 71' ; thence S 1°10 ' 00" W 339 . 72 ' ; thence N 88°04' 38 ' W 165 . 20 ' to the true point of beginning. ANY AND ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON Mar. 23 19 66 AT 8 : 00 P.M. TO VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME . PUBLISHED March 9 , 1966 JAMES DENZER , SECRETARY RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATIO N I , JAMES MAGSTADT , Hereby certify that three ( 3) copies of the above document were posted by me in three conspicuous places on the property de- scribed above as prescribed by law . Q T .., `'' 'K ;? Signed- �� //�z ��( AT T.�,,S1R; �V U L I / ° ,��g1011 J`��'� ,i/4 .. / tr,' ?1, v. A PR1966 RECEIVED er, • CITY of RENTO' ti , .. 0 ..cRK'S OFFICE',lirJ `9`)1�'929Z 2�'2� . April 8, 1966 • To the Members of the Renton City Council: Realizing the difficult position you are so often put in, we must , neverless , inform you of our feelings about the re-zoning of the area between M and 0 Streets to Sunset Highway, Our homes will be directly affected by the R3 • re-zoning and we oppose it for the following reasons: 1,. Complete loss of privacy to homes adjacent to . this property 2. An eventual higher taxation 3. Loss of present property values which includes . - the resale value of our homes 4. Loss of the view to property owners 5. A heavier burden to our already crowded school from proposed multiple dwelling 6. Spot re-zoning in a residential area These are but a few of the reasons for our protesting the proposed R3 re-zoning, although we are not as opposed to an R2 re-zoning. An invitation was extended to you coubcil members to come to our homes and view this proposal from our property , and to those who were interested enough to do so , may we extend our thanks. We are sure you found you would feel as strongly as we if it were your home about to be hovered over by an apartment house. In closing, let it be said that we live , work, spend our paychecks and vote in the City of Renton whose citizens generally oppose spot re-zoning. ft Thank you for your consideration, ,d--. i Z zt- .i,s7/622v-c-e_ not, 1e47d (J' 7f- LeAAl 0/477".-4t;721. (.164/17k1 42(( ge/' Renton City Council Mee____n Minutes 4-11-66 PUBLIC HEARING: Arterial Street Improvement and Development U�. This being the date set, the hearing was declared open. Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director, presented proposed street and arterial improvement plans pointing out that the traffic situation has reached a critical standpoint and some attempt must be made to relieve existing problems as well as to plan for anticipated future problem areas. Film slides of traffic patterns, flow maps, aerial photosof the City and proposed routes and right of way improvements were shown and traffic volumes compared with increases projected to 1985 as per Renton Urban Area Comprehensive Plan and the Central Business Development Plan of the City's 701 Program. Traffic Engineer Del Bennett showed slides of parking areas and planned improvements, outlining areas proposed for improvement and costs involved. Included were Grady Way - Logan to Smithers crossing, $1,000,000.00, 3rd Avenue North, $1,000,000.00, widening of 2nd Avenue, $2,000,000.00 and Main to Mill Street transition, $250,000.00. The State Highway Department improvements affecting the City will include relocation of the Benson Highway, widening of Sunset Blvd. E. from 116th Avenue to 138th Ave. S.E., and King County will four-lane S.E. 128th from 132nd Ave. S.E. to 176th Ave. S.E., serving to alleviate existing problems. Funding will include bond issue proposals as well as application for Federal Aid. Mr. Bennett reported traffic volume in- creases on Airport Way and Rainier Avenue reaching up to 21% and generally through- out the City a 10 to 15% increase in a one year period. The 701 Plan urges action emphasizing the core area rather than the industrial areas however, our problems are especially urgent here also. It was pointed out that The Boeing Company in 1965 covered 4 million square ft. with building space and as of January, 1967 the building space will occupy 6 million square ft. Priority items as outlined will be only an initial step to the overall long-range improvement program for the arterial street system. This is by no means going to take care of our problems but will be considered an initial step towards alleviation thereof. Question were invited at this time and after discussion of priority items and routes of major arterials, it was moved by Schellert, seconded by Dahlquist, that the hearing be closed. Carried. As there was no further discussion, it was moved by Hulse, seconded by Perry, that the matter be referred to the Capital Improvement Priority Committee for recommendation. Carried. ouncilman Schellert advised that persons in the audience wished to participate in regard to matter of Lyman Riley property rezone from SR-1 to R-3, located on Sunset Blvd. E. The matter had been tabled the previous meeting and it was Moved by Schellert, seconded by Hulse, to take the matter from the table for discussion at this time. Carried. Communication was read containing 35 signatures of property owners in the area protesting the rezone of the property to R-3. It was pointed out that an R-2 zoning would receive less opposition. Moved by Perry,;,.seconded by Morris, that the audience be allowed to comment at this time. Carried. Mr. William Jones, Mrs. Betty Clouse, Mr. Carl Kever, Mr. Hubert Lange, Mr. Ed Beckley, Mr. A. L. Ames and Mr. Matt Kovak spoke in opposition to the rezone for reasons of loss of privacy, loss of property values, restrict number of persons in the area and to preserve the single family residence atmosphere of the area. Mrs. Riley, requesting the rezone, called attention to assets to be considered in the fact that the property was a long narrow strip facing Sunset Blvd. E. making it impossible for traffic or pedestrians to leave or enter the area from any place except Sunset Blvd; that it was an ideal location being close to shopping facilities, schools and as far as privacy is concerned a substantial gr6wth of trees would be kept intact so as not to disturb the natural setting of the landscaping. The site is accessible to sewer facilities =., 3 the tax base of the City would be increased by the addition, and they would be willing to go along with anything the City would propose to take desires of their neighbors into consideration. Mr.. Riley added that the property does not lend itself to development as it is now zoned and that he would willing to observe a 35-40 ft. buffer zone of R-2 to allow the residents of the Bo-Marc Addition some degree of privacy. Present zoning allows to 30 ft and an R-2 would permit one story or 25 ft. Discussion dis- closed that petitioners would be willing to go along with a reasonable bu'fer zone but that it was desirable that proposals therefor be studied to determine effect it will have on adjacent areas. Councilman Dzlaurenti displayed drawing prepared by Planning Director Ericksen providing for 157 ft. buffer zone and it was pointed out that the total property is 357 ft. Councilman Bruce upheld cause of property owners after surveying the area with respect to valuation of their homes and wishes to preserve the naturel setting and single family residential atmosphere. After further discussion of size of buffer zone it was moved by Garrett, seconded by Morris, that action be delayed for one week giving the developer and property owners an opportunity to meet and come to some possible agreement, advising the Council of their decisions. Upon inquiry by Poli regarding enforcement of restrictions, City Attorney Shellan advised that screening provisions require separate covenants running with the land to be executed by the owner of the property, the Ordinance only providing for the R-2 or R-3 zoning. The pending ,otion carried. Mayor Custer thanked the participants for the courteous and orderly m.:nner in which they had conducted themselves during proceedings and the Petitioners thanked the Council for visiting the site and for time allowed on the matter. -2- -to,�i ,WAS H I N GTO N the Jet Transport Capital of the World ' . y s *, PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 4 , 1966 Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City Council Re : Actions of the Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting March 23 , 1966 Gentlemen and Mrs. Dahlquist : The Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting of March 23 , 1966 recommended to the City Council for further action the following items : 1. REZONE APPLICATIONS : (1) Lyman Riley, Appl. No. R-304-66 , request for rezone from SR-1 to R-3 , property located on Sunset Boulevard E. between M Street and 0 Street. The Comprehensive Plan indicates this area as potential multiple family residential. The property is presently being used as sing- le family. On the basis of its review the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezone request. (2) Fifth West , Inc. , Appl. No. R-298-66 , request for rezone from SR-1 to R-4 , property located on Benson Highway south of Puget Drive extend- ing to 106th Ave. SE. The Comprehensive Plan indicates the area as being suitable for multiple family resi- dential use. The property is adjacent to ex- isting R-4 zoning. The Commission recommended approval of the zoning as requested, since it is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan and is a logical use in this area. ( 3) John Golithko, Appl. No. R-302-66 , request for 11 rezone from R-2 to R-3 , property located at 2808 and 2806 7th Avenue North, on the NE cor- ner of 7th Ave. N. and I Pl. The Comprehensive Plan indicates the area as potential multiple family residential. The property is located adjacent to existing High- -1- 1 114, K ,r a 1 We, the abutting property owners and neighboring ,residents, object to the proposed rezoning of the property on Sunset Boulevard East between "M" and "0" streets from SRi to R3 for the following reasons: - 1. This would be strictly spot—zoning. 2. We bought in this area believing we were buying in a restricted residentual area and wish for it to remain that way. 3. It will restrict the view and country--like atmosphere we feel we have. 4. It will cause an additional load on our already overloaded schools. 5. The loss in resaleability of our homes. 6. The increase in taxes which will eventually be necessary. 7. The loss of privacy in the property directly adjoining this property. PR 1S6a .� VED rnToN / . . ' '-- ---� ' ' ' ------- ---------} ' / � / �- ~/ 7 �� ^ | IVo - ~ � ` �� � _ TICE � �� • We, the abutting property owners and neighboring residents, object to the proposed rezoning or the property on Sunset Boulevard East between "Me and "©" streets from SRi to R3 for the following reasons: 1. This would be strictly spot-zoning. 2. We bought in this area believing we were buying in a restricted residentual area and wish for it to remain that way. 3. It will restrict the view and country-like atmosphere we feel we have. 4. It will cause an additional load on our already overloaded schools. b. The loss in resaleability of our homes. 6. The increase in taxes which will eventually be necessary. 7. The lose of privacy in the property directly adjoining this property. • A • • '//. t4 & 7A • /1/0 25'; /- 217 . 3 fc) 7 5-r/ 8>va 7Zz.:rek 39V// AE /1), _ _ AL-`5- 7 /47 c5-1; ;_ • 6 /7 .5- /‘ • / 6' t/il-2 AL 6 d„_c; • •-v >'•lits-' • c /o , 0 3 1/ 71.?(: -10 Ccr5-" e ` -4 216' /6 3 7 5, Z..°/zi4/),-":4_=_::(1-. 75/1:/--7_:::0jA/o4._:-/v. 1.6.:4z...,7-e..4.4/7.4--i,,,,z). ___. N . •Q - ,, r/ : Pug. OF r•1&` V✓; OFT,I /✓.4 4 o ..53�,�` 5C A L Gr (U 3 iq, 1 ........ ...... �f9'__ •5 Y',,'� ,:--- - /Pf& - .- . /t^! ..,i• O o 64 1.J '•, ", /—T-C,d 5-0 C� °7+ J . Z / /E TP a&,' Tw Ai 2°29'ae tea/ 3-5 ' TO T '4. • .: `SDO e I-11 Z • . 4.r ssfe,),11: h.. /JiG,ej&ti . '� '{; :: .��_•,' 714 S �,16/4'.8 4 (-). ..a`‹. .S'L„ .,.."0 CJ l.f1 a e y F • :: %: d:' :•; t � . ,. ...;. ZOAJ / J 6 ROLL CALL VOTE DATE ORD. NO. AYE NO HULSE, PRES. BRUCE S CI-IELLE RT DAIiLQUIST GIANINI PEDERSEN GARRETT TRIMIM PERRY DELAURENTI POLI MORRIS TOTAL