The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA00-137 E OU31011,4 AR RITE STATISTIC, LEGAL DESCRIPTION • -� I BUILDING core,UDC 93 BR --»-s x,. �..Y :, 2 ZOx,x6�Ix 11(➢ilR,x[US,RIK) 9gnur RECORDED UNDER COUNTY 3 BUILDING SEIB.,TM,20' RECORDING x0 9805219011 .a r SIRS APE 5 SINATF IN DIE N umsc'"'EeEwlrtax,s.r,.wr,20 MIN.clot LOT DEPOT= •) • \ind USING. Bn a uxrox.muxx v xwc,su,E aE SIDE,QCREM.NENE 5 SITE AREA, 321.952 Sr t)39 ACRES)(BUILDING AREA,10 fmTBRIN 9,752 SF(30Y COVERAGE EI TOTAL SITE) a ()MEND kW 9a 752 SF0 0 TYPE Q CVG,RUCT., YYY $ J C >USE CLASSIFICATION,SB ICE(ASSLLEREY�12.60 25.p 0'SP 9. )6�8[xF/1000 MIN 1&000 w(12 62).75/112 a 0 p1 1FACTORY' 9'STD�1 RAPE.. //150 MIN t/15/1000 PufM„w f E ' Lq ! 6 1 11 BUILDINGANEI. 19 CAM TO STRCTURE/ROM,APPROX.35 AONE 210 $YII•.A SI a FINIS.rtmR LOT12 COVER.MX 1 13 AN ASPHALT V s 14. APE ISLANDS•MERNAG 10,320 S r 15.LANDSCAPE R IRED¢0.3 RM.EXCEPT CURD CUTS)13.809 S r 16.TOTAL LANDSCAPE NOTES ADDITIONAL U E DESKLLFEO SITES IS3R[MIREO`IN NATURAL 1 BEING ACC0.m,ED FIR IN WETLAND BUFFEAND R DETENTIONLANDSCAPING5 Er s.x S.F. NI ED3 ..�� vICINITT MAP "°� eM I �,3 o R WETLAND)g,xINI. F 5Y F MEA xI NIN 1 Ila 3)Goo IRRIGATImfIS REQUIREDLANDSEAPE. NORTH 1 C Nm,REC�E 0 1 I- I =O g 0 \� ; oliI11 . .1 1gpoxD ' _ Nn N i _ 1 $�I ASTN.LT �i j_ I*'- .4 m I - n �D 1 mom ---- »,: D � - -- �D„ it - i1 /'•io�. • �z ��"-T `TREES 01 uno.m1aE3m,zeREA g I3 i II Nco _D._D PROW.3I�DF,333 �D �`wETUNO 3 1I II— /� s ;g/////�' 1 0 1 arm I 3� 1 %O.l > ,R_`o Ili�%////�\. -s == �sol �m� �'�c�, ,9 - ------\ 0 a e�R,. ---- 1 i 3� I N BI Ns Rr n m - In 5vc0 •• >, ' aomELRmnG a - 36 L va n;r,-- �__ iRnm - 1Nm ' ro�0vr" ERR w315E� 11 �•• ' I i1 L J't ! \ w 11 �1� \-EPR4521XPEER ws� 15' 1 •r 1" — : 11 5 •\ I I $ BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 98,152 SF. " 11 CCTJ • II SECOND FLOOR: 98,152 5P. $ E u�!/-"'" _�I31 3N m"�'��1b` / �XR `1 19"1,504 5P. '� R CCR.uIm.R..2,0 UTILITY� T 1. -�uCI--.."..41111114 r :,:„!„, -E,N•LOTE«.Rw R / R° 50 // // —i �1 ,-�Y— r. Pm"`w`A MODEM Pr 4A idel4 y.. ro +� . �.r�,,,*m � .I.. ", ,,ix E Y.R, ORif,,„,1,1 I , .4.,„,„ 1 ,, I ii'.E3AP tl, I 1) $ L�1 Ebl n A AI dLh Al m.9 s so e' n bid r s I 6' +! � F ° I Is,an O '• .�I I. �.. , R I I I_I If71 z Z I I < ', 6I I ;� u��;1 1 --- y �z ELt� !ii(I -- • ,,,w, 2 C1.- M023093, IX ,>3b a � • �'_+w..4 ,. ® � 'I Ran.1511,17 .ias , y I '4 �T —I 1 1 . I � NEEuw M L.9,3,g _ =•R I• ""i .��-- � cry 1 3 ,'Z, vwu, 1 I LIND AVEN E I — — — — — — — — — — — — e M, L:-'�I ��. 1 1g .a Z • o OA- (.3 N A .. ` - srR,f� aM _ ` O• O 7- RwLR — �\ • I••II r17;ip. • LIND gy�NUE a / — AND 3414. ._____ B�G3,��R wSNIA E..� o 10 SITE PLAN �E1 a m I I SD-1 -I ,�- I I' I� I 10/12/00 4 00 pm C\DAD\9830GULF\SD-1 Cwg BEE&CET A-2 WE&EEf A-3 Q t 0 © 0 © 0 0 n M 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 0 2I 0 © 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 li f � 1� LQ'' a . a R '4o ^ i � � I ©- � t f— f -- + — ► - Vt. f —i t f f f— f —f - a i a ©-, 1— I— I —I A 4- 1— i- 1 —} + --4 + I— } — .. ---4 �+ I— I —f A �i— I— I —I —4 1:17_ . -- •R: iJ4 ggs gel - o b b b () b b b b b b o 'Zm I � o & 11 � 71 73 71 79 37 33 �i �_� Z OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLANS_ swie i..�,-0 SCALE V.S $ tm 18 a BEE SHEET A-4 ! E &EET A-5 VA.•1` T sm O5 rso 0 0 © ® 0 �I ® 73 75 31 ® __, '1`(11 0 ■t�_A1 •L I I I I I I I II I I I I I . — v �, o- WA w o I I f Po f I f iI f f I o — — }- -} - -}- — }- -} — + I- - .. — i-4-- - I- -} — + — I- -► -- - -® 0 o _ 1 I I- i — I — — I — — dx E I -0 k z� 0 © ''- — - - - - - - ! - - — O c �zo m o E, 1 co PI O U 61 b b b 11 73 71 b 37 % 11 OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN �' A-1 10/09/00 3:02 pm C:\CAD\0027NETWORKS\A-1.DWG IoJ COI J . I 1 1112 MY I d S.W.29TH uYp ZcoC- S.W. 78T guZ z ! II 1 m m \---\-I ! / 1 sW.34TH j74,.,y FARWEST , STEEL / 2 „„. . au ii HOME I ti� U. BASE I I • 4 . 4 1/1 UPI \`� _ • '� iT �� J v p y.•,Z ��H NMI g a y ;•:P I o IH . sr. .;...c::.::Z fr. 1--4--11-1 INF> (7 �:r.•vol r I ...44i VALLEY M • RAILROAD R/W - I ,�{C ri-- 40+ ,— _ cm F //�/ pQ' gW,4/ST ST. / / ¢ 3.1T7TH S ° 171 IMFAI iM* . LEY MEDICAL C •R —.. ffallt _ -�- I. I. - W-43RD ST. u 1• _: Alf �� •ENTON COnpo• LIMIT • ,•. �'�ENTO •�,•: :.n I II 3' 47 13. iLL p• ;.‘ lir• i6300' NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES --....111-- 1:\ I \ --- / (L .4 -S7-1.1.)))) . STORM DRNNAGE STRUCTURES . ' 1,_ ‘, -,'', I . r . COM,HOO / 0 TIPE II-4,9" C)TYPE II-54" OVERFLOW STRUCTURE CONTROL STRUCTURE ..,.-CO I• .; n I . n J FigurrtiF 1 LOT a PER DETAIL.SHEET 6 PER DETAIL,SHEET 6\‘‘, TOP 14.24 TOP 16.00 I I I IVA-94-1574.1.A) 15"IE 10.65 15.IE 10.65 • v v,r;,srsv.„ / I /. ,. DETENTION POND • - \,1,1 • w Ss.'NI il - - __ i _ _______ ,__,_ _ , 0 12"INLET IE 10.48 EP a78-7c., - -- , k GI/2'INLET IE 10.82 - _ _. COTTONWOOD - 1 6-11E T,25 KT EfL,R 2 II ri ti IV CONGAS>a --- '.... - 0 12.OUTLET IE 10.65 ,,,•':- griliffse'70- ',. __ c.,.,,,.;._.......„ ._, CO,.WOOD TREE3 •..„(...... ,,,,.. MAX.WATER SURFACE ... 14.24 pi., TOP PERMANENT POOL -, 10 65 il,,-, 4.,:',:il II 1 11 1 ° 'lir. ,,,/•••,,,,...,...7„..'12‹:‹3231 1-.P'l )112til 1 0 V )- .... _ _ ----- ------ ''''''''-', LZURIEDDE grIVRVa CB 4TYPE II-48.11,111 g ,,,,,,,q, 0 1 .1 _- -Tenrw,r------------ -310.-12"CPER- 12"IE 12.10 et ......5._,2-.6.--- -___13-_-,,,'," \\ \'-,..,-,,,,---,-,:,1 , .,,,.,,, - • ,,,, ..:,-,,.; ,. 41 tfr - r-.. ------ \ ---------"WO,er'ti,fr•---=.----"- :.-- -S .(2..E:10.90 ,,,101,2 ,,,i) , 11 - I `s DIRECTION OF FLOW 1 - , . ... -DOWNSPOUTS THIS SIDE OF 's ----- -- " . i I ll '. NOTE 1 '-•-...... 1 / BUILDING TO SPLASH BLOCKS \ '''.".'..,,m'• I lell I „.., \,s,,____...//, LQ1,7 TYPE I CB AT CENTE . I LOT 7 / 1 . UNLESS OTHERHISE SHOWN , , AP,-RvA,,,,,,,ON OF ROOF---t,---_ETW5L-TAIERAL TO DI. ‘1 ', '''''•'72/ , /- it A s.:;',•:!, , 1.,i„ 1,1E2 H I , / REMOVED \\ % I A WAL ROOF DRAINS TO BE IIGHTLINED TO ELBOW INSIDE CB Wm,. NEAREST CATGH BASIN OR CONNECTED 8"IE 13.33 TYPICAL 0 4 GENERATOR , ,/ (Br rorcecTocc..rrunr- OT 2 _ , I - 4. , , or,OF RENTON) P'Z'';illr;r7ggsW\V!, IF', via TO fARKING LOT CONVEYANCE SYSTEM. STUB lk CAP PADS 8".9E 1333 - 1 8.1£1333 i • ,...... ....„, 0 •- no.gi'STUB R CAP \ ' il ,...M.,' 'Q NI '-. SRO It CAP ' A clUf 3 W•NP-\ ' A r- JO.!HOPES,./GRES/A 1,.i'i i i EN .y I I I I 1. • / .i.:A1' , _ ::,-Al I 1.1PKS;REO NO ESN TO GLOBES T:.,51EAL,10• 1 us .- - SEE NOTE / ,....an, .z SE‘E.,,N•TE 1,. , \, / 'I' -.." LEO NO 9602291 5 It / / \ SEE/N.TE 1 r p Is„ ---'1 REL.NO 960702OLS6 A # 11111 . , __ lo, / 03 6.T1PE II-1,9. ..- ...., 1 A / \ ' „' „ SEE AWE 1 To, r--./:,-- , ,.. 18.40 PP,E'lli. • MI 11•1r.- ishil=-0 , ,.,., ".„.."" "'II R - r•-,-- - .... . , R •r o •• •• • /. \ ••• 12"IE 11.47 - 1 , 1 -44_ -11 A I 1 or r 2* `tcloAST.ITFT I' '' I Vd TOP 16 75 'lc-7,'2B'S VTg VI /11 lig -111 2,, -- •''''' '• IIP 1, r*ATI p 175•-a-od. riir',.' .• In"1- -1.171 I 1 1 '4:ftv,g V..(7•\.V1 litsgT1;-:4, c, '''''s , _ 8 E,,. _ __ , ,0 . •0,• iii- ,2_- :,-./- -• . :••• , , .., •,.WHEECSTOPS 1 -; , ,-----6,.L. . I , 1111, , '' ..r. Id__ 4144111111.111F4----- --. ILL'' ' .\I ai. ' Ninli‘ to'k. ,'- / z- J02655 ,,r2ESI • • .6/21 1 11111•••'•-- i \MA 1:11111111M1 'Vl. ..- • / c'q'"" - '' '-':g071;:r'''' / ,_ '..,.A-- ,.-„F.:. .../. --.' 'TRWHIC WILLA OREPLPOITS ty'.. ,. --n- I A' 4 ,20/RAILROAS 9"--I r-o- • .v -4M--"-A 44 ,WAHLTMAILE ESLOT ro 1 ' 1 1,.L !IAN I 1 i 1 i ,,„,„, mom i______ --. .,,,,,,,a.44... ---- ----____ • ''--. ' " .. -1111 - •,,, ,,47X,VT"'7f," , '' IIIN a'47672 mnsu •. -._., . a-157-MM filif-.."w- '' IMILIMINEX.--mempal-I•E I rirm"nii mi i LIV4.41W.F.."%r4 . ,444., .-.:-..-§K-"""°'""`'`, -- .4.•KIALLA -'• S,,ALE 1,1...)e, 5,.._,_..,._,,,,,,,,,, o,,,r 2.,,,,,,,,,,,,..,%11p„..,,__ _MINSFORMER_ ,1 1 • . 2-- :7',-1-7_y--,7;" ' •11- ----,,„-----'-----___----:=-2-.,____---____ r I Ei 7s-p,'""=f4(fir-----------pki°5°6. ---7 7":f _r,„ . „--- 41IMINCM. inl.._ .11M1MrEm............-.-i.- ..L , lui ADJUST ER zn.pr I FINISH GRADE -'-'---....4....unn, i.mi.m.m..........................iii:....:LIND A VENUE SW iiii.....-ir - :::::;11!:11;'!1--:"::P---------7t4 --- -;-'--'-------- -;;------------- --j -- -- ,VIt,f l'Z""' _________________TOa 17.27 a.z72:-43- sk -- I I 1 j ___ -- -...04_ EAT". Trz.o .:IMM111.11rAIMMINIMInj 12"IE 1.2.10- -'. - 7,---_______ laiskiiv. ',I.e..-- , . •., - _• 1.ALL FLOOR DRAINS TO BE -,.., ..Na 7 147011.14•1V-Akte ,/ rmiN4 CONNECTED 10 SANITARY SEWER. 2.ROHR,.FOOTING DRAINS TO \ '''': ')14' il PARKING LOT STOR1,1 DRAWAGE \. *I ,F.'''' / 8 -_____ -I 0.•-________ --_--__--__ ---_ CB 1Z TYR 11-48. •-. •CO ki / TOP 1Z• :I 14 .4• /8"IE 1 15 9 I 'ff. • k i k 1 _ CLEAN our % . 10' VARIES 22' 6. VA.. I °IV) I .2 / '''"'-12.-8"CPEP 0 1.25X 2 i If- it 0 .ff, CB 1,TYPE I m g SIDEWA '''' n '' r_ cx 0,' c2.„ i" .CURB H 12 II.., n. , I E Flan,FOR n2 ' 1 LPLAN7ER . -- M-- - - Nom CONTRACTOR TO(MUSE EAISBNO CURB UNE AS PROPOSED PROP.SWALE II ... BASE LINE TO ESTABLISH KIRSH GRADE[LEMBO. 6'SIDEWALK ,T,:f.. :1)4 MI FOR LATIOSGEE AND SIDEWALK AREA PER SECO. •.. I 1• .EP 0 05BX 4. MATCH FINISH 4 lel.' •:,--- ..?J. S. il SECTION A-A GRADE an, TREECE&COMPANY,INC. 8 rli ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS ce 74rynE I...`. . 1,r. .-,,, ,- • W/DEBRIS BARRIER---__ A A NOT TO SCALE '''.4, ox'46 •'NooNAt- gr.117titTst T.,°,.(lisrLiZe'''' "°' ... CAN WI rd. 4',. . '.: PER DETAIL.SHEET• i.-' 2"ASPHALT CONCRETE CLASS e I ExPIRES 1/2/02 I CITY OF RENTON P. 8'IC 11.00 EX.12.SO STUB 111. .. 5,STO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS :. I OS , ,,,,,• , STAMP NO VALID------------ COLIPAOTED MEW LIAIERIAL PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES NOTE ' , UNLESS T SIGNED AND DATED GRADING AND STORM ,,,,,, ,,,,, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IE A. LOCATION OF EX STORM STUB. TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION DRAINAGE PLAN NOD,ENGINEER OF ANY NOT TO SCALE - DES.. LiGT DATE 1/15/00 VAULT AREA DESCREPENCIES. 2 260 AMEBA-ONIT STOCK 1121.12 BAD BOT 'AZ.. .,AAA AA, EKE ATUTE RSITRE12- DETAIL ,. ,,e.R crn,,RESTON CONDUITS Inc ear 6/22./26 orTEAALA. Aro, SCALE 1,20 NO 0500010 55 ''''''' 505 ,,,,,,,,V. ,,...,„,,,..... 002177 2 077 0 inn o ,� . a II II Er 111113:441:*"1"...1. .CSvYY:i::i5::w°ke4�'��E''Ax'.4°13EM::...•. /ir •o , lull 9- /�. -7',i‘Proi4 i ). (COL' CO, R im' +a ; ONO` k1 s= m' `_4 /'�,' ';,.gib: Ar \Ra • !,: ),•ap0000noo,1- Ititr`. , y^ /o n o *AVM', _ fip,,fdifvp A g � 9 , r0-►_ f eob a. .„CI g D ti D oo4� posiar . nay?; 'd'� / 7110 �',/�t� MATGHLINE A ' ' Emsi e ' 410,1 :1 _ \gas ;. ,! D N , �1„s// �� -'1 � 4uu ,000mvoonuuu,.i^�4, � AVM 4 ,.., *"...0...44:4 . $° 1 1 *ri D 11;1 I ;per - : y :. X. o. � g ae;; WOW' ir ii / 7 ,,,,,1,..,,,,,,&443,732:32=9.P..9#.91?.91.59.P.WM.R.9..9P!!!4 ,%le, iFIIP MATGHLINE A hR PHONE (206) 433-8997's n PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES Co FAX (206) 246-8369 .M DATE °E�°R'°r'°K PROJECT `99°`a`, MUNN OR onrE II Z.). LIND AVE. AND SW 39TH ST V ,,,,,q4 RENTON, WASHINGTON �g��izzzo GATEWAY DRIVE SUITE ufi CHECKED ce L ChItoct]g EATSLE, WASH6NGT08 uafr �vis, PAINTED FLASHNG 4 4 9 9 / ,—PAINTED TILT-UP CONCRETE 4 4 _ °E .GF GB I / / REVEAL '�" - `e�B' ...LLL 1Gf ,. I I 17, SIDIFYaI l 7 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 . J I ; I I I LL�_I 1 �k4% --- I r----, -— --- ar----111 -- _ - , 9 0 0 "L 1 ^ F 1 -I-_,,� ` � 1 _III--/-f�`� H , --A II U GENERATORSTYP. `-LOJVErd TTP. 1 E AND ALUMIWI WNDOL B II ACCENT BAND FEAST(CLEAR/W/ PANTED FLASHNG WEST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF TILT-UP CONCRETE W/ BRONZE GLASS i o A S E LANSCAPE BERM PANTED TILT-UP CONCRETE O O O O © Q METAL CANOPIES WIN �A REVEAL - _—_ - METAL TIE BALKS �Y I I I I 0 \, MTL,IDING r -I I I IJ - I Rt'"'�� I I �-I I I I i I I I I I I I �- � r _ t �f I 11 II nI .,,,, --- II r-_-, II r---,II -- 71r 1 I I �- < (� 5@ III - 11L.-1 1, ; III I' --- i ----5' 1 ss STUCCO SOFFIT AND ALIMNIM WINDOW MAN ENTRANCE 9 0 ACCENT BAND FRAME(CLEAR)LV LOWERS ttP.' GENERATORS TIP. BRONZE GLASS a 9 a TILT-UP CONCRETE W/ INSULATED PANTED FLA-RING WEST ELEVATION NORTH HALF PANTEDFLASHNG LANSCAPE BERM t PANTED TILT-UP SCALE:Mb'=I'-O' PAINTED TILT-UP S Zm CONCRETE ('Y� 4 _ QCONCRETE C OO q REVEAL m �t~'1 4 0 0 ® q aZm REVEAL - _ 9 7N y I9 ~`fiy 1 11 STUCCO SOFFIT AND �•Lei �`i1 ALWTIMM WINDOW STUCCO SOFFIT AND ACCENT BAND ALII'1IN➢'1 WINDOW FRAME(CLEAR)W/ ACCENT BAND FRAME(CLEAR)UV .01 BRONZE GLASS TILT-UP CONCRETE W/ BRONZE GLASS S EMULATES TILT UP CONCRETE W/ LANSCAPE BERM INSULATED NORTH ELEVATION LANSCAPE BERI SOUTH ELEVATION PANTED FLASHING SCALE VIG'•I'-0' vnI c MG'•I'-0' on PANTED TILT-UP CONCRETE :4,1k -- S I Ci)z !..,.11 , i .11( ir o WARE OVERHEAD V FUTURE OVERHEAD' Pry MN1000R Z DOOR RE EAD 5 (nAN DOOR (nav DOOR MAN DOOR EAST ELEVATION NORTH HALF ( x PANTED FLASHNG SCALE UV I'-0° PANTED TILT-UP CONCRETE Qi 9 9 9 9 9 0 O 9 9 9 0 z 's o ci. zit m0 I I i I - I 7 CO a �I 1A 1111 �_, ( / 2� FUTURE OVERHEAD V FUTURE OVERHEAD V FUTURE OVERHEAD NEW OOOR1EAD( ,-FUTURE OVERHEAD NEW OVERHEAD- (MAN DOOR 1 MAN DOOR DOOR MAN DOOR DOOR DOOR EAST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF A-7 SCALE NS'•1'-0. 10/09/00 3.09 pm C:\CA0\0027NETORKS\A-7.DWG • IIII!II ■ ' — I_l_ I-- ' -- _— N I , a =, -, \ � ',III IIIIII I It � Aa"x1 w,r, i ,_SV j 5(3,0.000 xtc j I 11I !\ i ;4`' � 1+ GL _ - 111 \ \%, \\\k� ■ \\`. I{r0•IS BOND(NJ H]flp0 13 0p'LT___ _-_tr `I x1—_\ I fz_____�_— � \ i�� ill l�sj 'I' \�J+1].00,OE RT. ..`� -W/COVE BLOpKN., " f_3• y I _ -.°--_ of --\�� 'IIII l II \ \�w%con3G eiNDar(wcl MWPN"s ;1%/.i i, I ��I I I -)II Y " - --- _y/. - '4';-_-----,,.!),,, 11 \\ JaJ6.00,OW R .• ":-r •.n'i. s _, s+ro---C _].5 6=ro? "_I II90-10•f) oe /ti_--! I ■ j i 9+6dIT I I j • \ - 2Y-1.'D.l.12AST 52____4_,__,_ LkA55 SP ei—T 1 x \]-10•r8•TEE(YJ+FL) E. - /: f-5•N A Y I �� =/ 3,, _2r / �Q. `---_'=f ■ -_it 1-B•CA 1F VALVE(FL•NJ I'ir' � DOCVA IN VADLT I �� w` �--- •, I W/CONC.BLOfJONG� All / a" Meg:\,x.*-ly_I� '1 1 + W/P/V PER CITY / 4H]9.p0 0.00'RT IS'PUBLIC WATER \ i 2J--10'D.I. 1� RENTON STD.DETAµlL'L 1-10•GAT VALVE MJ EASEMENT(IIP.) a8=3/590P LIFT \ /--- \• �f�, I��P�a.p. 1� ( ) l g I \ 9+6500,000'RT '■\p- Y �� \ J+20.00 0.tb RT i,. 11 2Y DOMESTIC gR1e1. 1-101,6•TEE(MJdL) `_ /SEE ARW.PLANS 11+50.00.0.00'RT T � I-II 1�2'BEND(NJ M.YTER 1-6•GATE VALVE f4MJ �� I-10'GATE VALVE(N✓) \�� ' �'oo IJ 1 .' \\ W (EAU) I s` ( ) 1-f0'AS'BEND I I-10'r6•TEE NJxFt (IJJ) / 1111t- \W/CONC BLOCKING _'� ) /CO CC.BLOCK/NC LOT] / W/CONC.BLOCKING 1 I-6•GATE VALVE I 2 IRRIfjA'710N SER�•T(.'E�_�" / BINDING SIT PLAN FOR (FLAW) -•1 IA I� �� III WI,. • ,/ II '°� NE'ITER/ MM.,.. I BURLINGTON NORTHERN W/GONG BLOCKING �`t„ �I�� /fI� n� I --- LOT 3 ALL FLOOR DRAINS`� 1 BSP NO.011-9� ��' / �+- / a[e xa ee D¢.��i , iII II o� I FF 19.0 I TO BSANI ANY SENFR / \ / I I /fF 1AC ISrt/`12+01.00,0.00 RT(-9' pcVz� I I�I, _ I .A' / `.�' / t,, //// < .1E -W I CO'JG BLOWN,.(N...SL'^'/� I / it LOT LINE]O BE REMOVED ttxoad �� III GRID UNE 12 GRID L%N�'f (BY FUTURE BOUNDARY UNE w¢�'w•oC a. L 225 A0.VSTN�T N,OUCH" GRID AURN 5 �l 1� a N a rozzosa.I I 1 1 ,11� II R (SEE ARCH P/A�5) (SEE ARLH'PLWS) I�( 8$s / l'/ i / 1 �I YAK I OF TON. l SEE PLANS) o / •o'WORM.erets[ 1i• ,,I .i I ' • Y t, o. I 100' I / !3�'/ - t_ csrr ro navcsr'srin I I I r' I■ �' I I I /. i acc.No s,¢,zsr Ss a I :I II �- _"�/ - ° \ .l / acc No 960=0996 1 -- all II ■ Li�� 1. �I I��P+UCWk Ad_ �__ - 1e F 7■.= ___-t.7 \ ` `cc'no"vi I I 1H I .,ENF{TT.) <:t, i Q•- -- /A 1: / 3•/E Izto ou I 4 . 1-10.45 0oD'arloeiatToz n II 75' _ J 77 ,� ....7A �1 r-1o•4s•BEND(M✓) oa I • I+I'•y/00'Ri ( •�-4�6"rY flBa - - -. \pW / -rt _ • .� \W/ODN0.BLOCKING i'i i I I ■1 111 r•p 0 ) I-" cx _ 40- -// - 16'rY FIBER/3 u, '�•. q+n 00.1400•a�' 1 v sm6-w, \cs �� `caa w eL, W I w - - f s� °' / OPTIC A r a ��.� 1-s•MVO Fc Assr" �/'✓' / 1 f-.', ® : �' II t G _'iM_ -� I JO S / y ,'.• ,/ 1J+n04 0.00'Rr =uI'■ -. .R �.-.. ■■` F I I I 1� �14+f9.f10.0.00'RI / 1 f0 i6"7,„,,tR) I�iJl:i w.�n - .,�ixJPJIAxOI Fa - - -r�—■J _4_i _�J 1-1'r!:2,,e_coar:,......1 L/.�� ( ) Po"'' � IIZ a f�-!ice• I 1-6•wT£vALYE RWJ.r sl ��j�.. � it .+ \6� aB•lE 11. I— _; ~�\�� W/LUNt, 2.COYG CLASS t/ IIv_�1�?L ..-._ ^^. y�■A•tr.ss Ni�O� _ ` Y 1.•D.1.1V� 2.-I(✓_D.I.CUS,r}v5�.51 iI1p _tUP" ,LINE1+00.0.00 RT •`---_ •.._. • ,— I� �__.�� 3.:-b1/tr Ori n[ixzv c xo\s1N/ (TOP.) I-I6•r10'WET TAP _ coxc/7.o -- ■_'�'6C1w '� �J N n �1-Ib'•rGA TAPPING PT j NJxfi) �PROP0.SED S(AtNEW.'".--•s Dus sroa J ,�r_..� " wIi 1-IO•GAT VALVE(FL )-- -TOP MATCH EX,,ADE__ ADA/ST EX VALVE ��` _ `-_'• d - W/GONG BLOCKING WSTALL•TIDE ftfX]F-2• W• --BOXES TO�ISYiEO 'c t[oxoxE c w'r LIND AVENUE SW 14+)0.26,0.00'R ` 1445204 0.00'R7'��it i V I ; i, UMW _(MATERIALS BY CONTRACTOR-.r------BACXFLOW VALVE GRADE(TOP <vosccvl a unu 1-16:10•NET(; -1-f0'21'BEND_- lAp BY-L77�MPROVE6 NET-TAP R/N_16.30 _ - a[e xa exa.soxsse --1-16 40•TAPPING TEE(KNEE W/GONG BLOCKING - -Diov_ '1"---- _� 'S"` SUB-LYNl1RACTGPS) B•l£11.30 IN) 1-10•GATE VALVE(FLMIJ) n, ea TRACTOR -�09=-SEE CONNECTION I OEIA/1 BfLOW B•IF 11.10 IOU •1 `—_. W/GONG BLOCX/NG COVTRACTOR TO 'FY COCAR - (MATERIALS BY CONTRACTOR, AND,E[EY.0 IX B•55 S77.187 _----- 'TAP BY CITY-t1�RO NET-TAP __�7\_ 1 CS,,, SUB-CONTRACTORS) SEE CONNED TAIL.SE OW _ crR nouns(w,SG.).., \ a�' J °I' • /ID7F5 WATER MAIN CONNECTION DETAILS 1. ALL NEW DUCTILE IRON PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BY POLIENDENE WRAPPED. SEE WATER UTILITY NOTE 4 FOR STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS 2 CONES OF ALL RELEVANT CITY OF RENTON STANDARD PLANS SHALL BE CONNECTION I CONNECTION 2 PRONGED TO CONTRACTOR INN NE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NEW 10•WATER-4, NEW 10•WATER- S SEE SHEET P FOR PROFILE OF SANITARY SEVER. - },.1_i 10110•VERTICAL CROSS(WAFT.)) 1 ID xf0•VERTICAL CROSS(MJrft) 4. AU 1100R DRAINS SHALL B£CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY SEVER LINE. I-10•BUND FLANGE(ON TOP OF 1 1-10•BUNG FLANGE(ON TOP OF 5 MINIMUM COVER FOR TO"WATER MAINS SHALL BE J FEET FROM FINISHED GRADE IEMPORARY�►LOW GROSS)W/2•LAP&1'PLUG TEAIPORARY�►)0'2 CROSS)W/2•TAP A 1•PLUG I MAXIMUM COVER SHAM,BE 6 FEET. BLOCKING ��7-IIII-� 6- �IOCR BTU)FIANCE(ON BOTTOM BLOCK/NC �,II� 1 10 or�•aBU�NO FLANGE(ON BOTTOM �l\G I'RA• ,! `/ 6. ALL NEW SEWER FACILITIES SHOWN SHALL LN PRIVATE /- 1 MAIN 1-10•PLUG(NJ)/2•TAP A I/ xy --16•VAIN I-M.PLUG(AO)w/2•TAP A ]. 2 DIVING FIRE HITLINGS ALONG MND AVENUE SW 1D BE RETROFITTED —W ( T•YEW.BLOW-OFF _ ??T I _ 2'TEMP.BLOW-OFF •- WITH 5.3)DRIZ FITTINGS. \ s z a SEE RENTON STANDARD PLANS-SANITARY SEWER T `1-16 if0•TAPPING T.(MJifL) 1-f6'r10•TAPPING 1£E OtAa) • .I �' I-10• S BLOCKING (FLAW 1-10'GATE VALVE(FL,u✓) T. REECGE.rxo LELOOLOV CELLS COMPANYcS DI um' SANITARY FRAME MANHOLE B071 W/GONG BLOG<INC W/LONG BLOCKINC , g•� q""qx[0/7/ex'I-/I LJ(tzp'elil-zxreA '�axyim seou MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER B074 TESTING CdNNFCTI0.N TF-STING CONNECTION 4JaRM,94'ti•ID A. y CLEAN-OUT B076 ^' 1-16'R10•TAPPING TEE(M n) 1-16•rt0"TAPPING TEE(M✓AFLJ MKS s/1/as CITY OF RENTON SFF RFNTCN STAN/IARD PLANS-WATER 1-10•GATE VALVE(FC+MJ) 1-10•GATE VALVE(FLAW)CONCRETE BLOCKING BOBS 1-TO•SLEEVE(MJ) 1-10.SLEEVE(NJ) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS B'DETECTOR DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY MOO W/CONC.BLOCKING W/CONC.BLOCKING SfAMP NOT VALID u`" FIRE HYDRANT B102 (MATERIALS BY CONTACTOR, (MATERIALS BY CONTACTOR, I•CONFOUND METER SERVICE MN 4•BYPASS BIOS EX.I6•MAIN TAP BY CITY APPROVED WET-TAP EX.O.MAIN TAP BY CITY APPROVED WET-TAP UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIESAND f0"GALE VALVE B091 _W T IVSUB-CONTACTOR) W " T W SIB-CONTACTOR) SANITARY SEWER AND WATER PLAN Or5.0.DI FINAL CGWNECIION fj AL CONNECTION 2 MO r pm no -Foto arr. ow orT /x L I'1N ...... �I. �� ti (BY CITY) (BY CITY) ,Nro 0 © CITY OF RENTON z n rr� �., :� NIL Planning/Building/Public Works - dic ir°oE�� o ' -OCT i.aA . 0,305 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 ; "` '" f Meren ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED ON CHECKS 7158401U.S. POSTAGE :tvoR:EsucAflufSaic imed F"'"� ,I +r. lesused -� ,�� tmpted N to Known _ cient Address No uch Street n'ouch Number. . h Office In State / 37 Dc ot ph: in i+ - — -- 7 l , • • 125360 0020 05 Burlington Northern Railroad 3501 East Valley Road -- Re4 98095 ii N0 SUCH j`� _ NUMBEP . !< V,}d co . R E TURN 10 S E'�DE I- ' ._1 ?�A � �= - ' !.I 1. ,l l�l.l I { I I D;I i t ? •': •i i 1 1� as fl 1 11,1.�11..i i i wn..m-.v*w•.s-w-.ww.mn..-....�-•e- J .... •_ •i•._. — • — :: ? iiiiiii:=1::. ' :} ii"li ,Iii::i:i:n:i:i VY 0 , O mu NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- • SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 25,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of F up to 17 generators for use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the. building within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore, SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan (File LUA-99-105) has been previously approved. PROJECT LOCATION: 3600 Lind Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 13,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 25,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: Fire Department Tank Permits,Building Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is located within the Employment Area—Valley(EAV) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and the Medium Industrial(IM) Zoning designation. The proposed generators to be added to the approved office/warehouse facility is consistent with both the EAV and IM land use designations. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A Development Regulations - Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Regulations,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The initial review of the proposal does not reveal the need for additional mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions.. NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION • • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION psi OM F.111 _ 1 V101 1Ali a AMP Mitlit � U. p 1,2s lc= JIT yip( r 'D.: NEIGHBORHOOD DETM►AP•• ..M„,,..ew,,.. NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION `U& S 125360 0010 07 125360 0020 05 125360 0030 003 G I Joes, Inc. Burlington Northern Railroad Eastgate Theatre Inc. 9300 SW Boeckman Road 3501 East Valley Road 7132 Commercial Park Drive Wilsonville, OR 07070 Renton,WA 98055 _ Knoxville, TN 37918 125360 0050 08 125370 0211 02 125380 0170 09 Powell-Orillia LLV Little Deli Mart, Inc. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 737 Market Street 19253 84th Avenue South 12835 Bel-Red Road #140 Kirkland, Washington 98033 Kent, WA 98032 Bellevue, WA 98005 125381 0010 02 125381 0010 02 125381 0020 00 Arensberg Investments Badford Property Investor, Inc. Badford Property Investor, Inc. • 3401 Lind Avenue SW . 270 Lafayette Circle 270 Lafayette Circle Renton,WA 98055 Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 125381 0040 302305 9001 02 Puget Sound Blood Center Victoria Park 921 Terry Avenue P.O. Box 1104 Seattle, WA 98104 Renton,WA 98057 2 MINI.MIN H I i 111 11. . - ma ,,,,) 11, =van ,,.... i dril ,.::.-:::., ....- IN .___._-_,i ,..„ AM . ...ET . . , ,,,w,,‘,. ..... . lly AM ffgai Ii �`' Mum tgat 6 JD j , 1 j 6 t :SA mum zly f . inr, ` jp. mu. ,:,9,.' NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP-• ......s>wnvexms ,T: .. CITY- .,IF :RENTON ..IL. '�,� : Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor .- _ Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,"Administrator ;; December.5, 2000 . • Mr. David Kehle :.• - 12720.Gateway Drive, Suite#116 ' Seattle,WA 98168 ._ . - - SUBJECT: , 360 Networks Emergency.Generators - Project No. LUA-00-137,ECF Dear Mr. Kehle; This letter is to:inform you that.the'comment and, appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for,the" above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination This decision rtis final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed.; . If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7270. For the Environmental Review Committee, - ' ," Lesley Nishi a - Project Manager • • cc: Pacific Gulf Properties/Owners - Victoria park Homeowners Association/Party of Record` - :. Mr.AlanZullig,-Mr. Robert Hofford/Parties of Record • :1 5 South Grady Way-Renton,,Washington 98055 ;-. CITY _ F RENTON - - Planning/Building%Public Works Department. • Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,-Administrator November 16,2000 • Washington State . . •Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section • PO Box 47703 : Olympia,WA 98504-7703 'Subject:' : Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on November 14, 2000: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS • • LUA-00-137,ECF • The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant. The building will be occupied by 360 Networks,which provides web hosting; client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies. Each generatorwould include a double wall,4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems.:The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading`areas.:`;Three generators are proposed within three of ' the four recessed truck bay area and four:generators-are proposed within the fourth truck bay area. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; therefore, SEPA review is necessary. The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal (file no.LUA-99-105), which was received a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated (DNS-M)on December 14, 1999. A minor modification to the approved site plan has been approved to allow for.the proposed revisions to the approved development plan. Location:. 3600 Lind Avenue SW. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 4, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00,application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055."Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,'(425)430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7270. ' For the Environmental Review Committee,: Lesley Nishihira : • Project Manager Cc: : King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F:Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region " • Duwamish Tribal Office.• Rod Malcom, Fisheries,.Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp of Engineers. .. • - ; • - .1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 c m. CITY ( _ _7=RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department' Jesse Tanner,Mayor_ • Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator , • November16, 2000 • Mr.David Kehle 12720 Gateway Drive,Suite#116 -Seattle,WA 98168 SUBJECT:J 360 Networks Emergency Generators Project No. LUA-00-137,ECF Dear Mr. Kehle: This letters is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee;(ERC).and is to inform you that they have completed their review,of the environmental impacts of the;above-referenced project. The ,Committee,-on November 14, 2000, decided.that your project will be issued a Determination of Non= Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable.;significant adverse impact on the environment. An:Environmental Impact Statement'(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).- •This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6,`Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 4, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together,with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton 'City Clerk's Office, (425) '430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified: If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7270. ;. For the Environmental Review Committee, Lesley Nishihir - • Project Manager cc: ;` Pacific Gulf Properties/Owners Victoria park Homeowners Association/Party of Record Mr.Alan Zullig, Mr. Robert Hofford/Parties of Record dnsietter : : . 1055 South Grady Way=Renton,Washington 98055 • Asa�.- •-•--��e,.__.._,_a.�_.___, ��a,__-:___�.:.�-. ,. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE • • ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: . LUA-00-137,ECF APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT NAME:. = 360 Networks Emergency Generators DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant. The building will be occupied by 360 Networks, which provides web hosting, client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication_ lines and companies.,. Each generator would include a double wall, 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading areas. Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay,area. Th'e accumulated total of the tanks associated with 'the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; "therefore, SEPA review is necessary . The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmentall,(SEPA) Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal (file no. LUA-99-105), which was received ,a Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M) on December 14, 1999..' A'minor modification to the,approved site plan has been approved to allow for the proposed revisions to the approved development plan. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:, - 3600 Lind Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided. in conjunction with the environmental determination.; Because these notes are provided as,information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental.determinations: Fire . - Separate plans and permits are required with the Fire Department for each of the 17 tanks. • Building. Building, electrical and mechanical permits are required. • • • • advisory notes . • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION • PROJECT NAME: 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant.The building will be occupied by 360 Networks,which provides web hosting,client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies.Each generator would Include a double wall,4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems.The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading areas.Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area.The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the ' generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore.SEPA review is necessary.The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmental(SEPA)Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal(file no.LUA-99-105), which was received a Determination of Non-Significance—Mitigated(DNS-M)on December 14,1999.A minor modification to the approved site plan has been approved to allow for the proposed revisions to the approved development plan.Location:3600 Lind Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM December 4, 2000. Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4.8-110.B. Additional Information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430.6510. t u • Jr)lar ) • • IL_.�.JJ gtir at • 111111.11 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION • L 41k r c t. (� e u u)hereby certify that -j copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . 1 p(i . I ( 2.000 • • Signed: / 2l AUF,ST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and for a State of Washington residing , on the 3 a tk day of O u, 'Woo . / iI 1 Q✓' -n-L NOTARYPUBLIC et.e. (. CS OF MARILYN KAMCHEFF WIOASHIN(IR'OEN MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-2 ` C�NATdMISSl01�"CXPIRES JUNE 20, 2003 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION i Charlotte Ann Kassens, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL months prior to the date of publication;referred to, printed and published in the DETERMINATION ' English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE , RENTON,WASHINGTON Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal The Environmental Review. Committee newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King ' has issued Ia Determination of Non- County. ' Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South Code. County Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to 360 NETWORKS,GENERATORS the subscribers duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice, a • LAU-00-137;EPFal e. " ' Environmental review-fof installation of generators for use as backup power 360 Networks Generators service. .Location:3600.Lind Ave.SW. A as published on: 11/20/00 ppeals of the environmentalI determination`must be filed in writing on or • ' before 5:00• PM December., 4,. 2000. . The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of , Appeals must,be filed in,writing.together', $40.25, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. with the required'$75.06' application` fee j I with:.,,HearinvEzamineri:City'ot;Renton,l 1055 South•Grady Way, Renton,. WA' Legal Number 8417 ; 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are t governed by City of Renton Municipal) Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional . 1 information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City' Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510. Published in the South County Journal L gal CI , South County Journal i, November 20,2000.8417 Subscribed and sworn before me on this o-ay of A/0']r- , 2000 asa tsvgsssss R�4f.4.0., .. ... �,t-,ey ®Zr ®°® m Notary Public of the State of Washington ®� ��t3`i� ::�a residing in Renton o ® `® King County, Washington aaa'9°e®e WA s-i\V I ��` a1aaeeuio CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT NAME: 360 Networks Emergency Generators DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant. The building will be occupied by 360 Networks, which provides web hosting, client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies. Each generator would include a double wall, 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading areas. Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; therefore, SEPA review is necessary. The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal (file no. LUA-99-105), which was received a Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M) on December 14, 1999. A minor modification to the approved site plan has been approved to allow for the proposed revisions to the approved development plan. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 Lind Avenue SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 4, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: November 20, 2000 DATE OF DECISION: November 14, 2000 SIGNATURES: l 11 / 00 9 Gre r an,A ir5iW or DATE Departmen of la ' g/Building/Public Works / l /Vt Jim Shepherd, A nistra or DAT Community Services Department Le�►�'TeTer, ire Chief DATE R- to Fire Department dnssignature CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT NAME: 360 Networks Emergency Generators DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant. The building will be occupied by 360 Networks, which provides web hosting, client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies. Each generator would include a double wall, 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading areas. Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; therefore, SEPA review is necessary. The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal (file no. LUA-99-105), which was received a Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M) on December 14, 1999. A minor modification to the approved site plan has been approved to allow for the proposed revisions to the approved development plan. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3600 Lind Avenue SW Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire Separate plans and permits are required with the Fire Department for each of the 17 tanks. Building Building, electrical and mechanical permits are required. advisory notes STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE November 14, 2000 Project Name: 360 Networks Emergency Generators Applicant: 360 Networks File Number: LUA-00-137, ECF Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA) for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service as part of building improvements needed for the future tenant. The building will be occupied by 360 Networks, which provides web hosting, client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies. Each generator would include a double wall, 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection and noise mufflers for exhaust systems. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building behind screening barriers within truck bay loading areas. Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; therefore, SEPA review is necessary. The property previously underwent Site Plan and Environmental (SEPA) Review for the Pacific Gulf Development proposal (file no. LUA-99-105), which was received a Determination of Non-Significance— Mitigated (DNS-M) on December 14, 1999. A minor modification to the approved site plan has been approved to allow for the proposed revisions to the approved development plan. Project Location: 3600 Lind Avenue SW Exist. Bldg. Area gsf.• 197,504 sq. ft. (to be constructed) Proposed New Bldg. Area: N/A Site Area: 7.39 acres Total Building Area gsf: 197,504 sq. ft. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). --- - -- - -- -- I! _ ) • - - _ -- �� ) FARWEST STEEL 1 `r. HOME I--PARKWG—I W ' •D'- -1 BASE I f >4 air co I I v ST.• Or IL •3G.•I � +MDICALCENT RAIL ROAD R/W - • - F-- 1 I-1 n i_p Project Location Map O+ S.W.41ST ST: • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F ro Committee Staff Report , 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS LUA-00-137,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 14,2000 Page 2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommends that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF XX NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. with Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of the proposal does not reveal the need for mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Fire 1. Separate plans and permits are required with the Fire Department for each of the 17 tanks. Building 1. Building, electrical and mechanical permits are required. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: The project site is basically flat and has been cleared of vegetation in preparation for the approved Pacific Gulf development project. No additional grading is proposed for the generators and associated fuel storage tanks. Earthwork activities on the site have been reviewed as part of the land use approval process for the approved development. As approved under the Pacific Gulf development proposal, approximately 65% of the e site would be covered with impervious surfaces. No alterations are proposed to the approved impervious area for the property. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: N/A 2. Water Impacts: The east boundary of the site includes a portion of a wetland area that continues off-site to the east, which was considered as part of the SEPA review for the Pacific Gulf development proposal on the property. This wetland was created as compensatory mitigation for the Home Base and Act III Theater projects located to the east of the subject property. City wetland regulations state that wetlands created or restored as a part of a mitigation project are considered regulated wetlands. The edge of the wetland has been delineated by B-twelve Associates and then surveyed. The created wetland replaced a Category 3 wetland, which require a minimum 25-foot wide buffer. The proposal would not alter the required buffer area from the delineated edge of the wetland. The proposed generators would be self-contained within an enclosed ventilated acoustical cabinet with a 4,000- gallon dual containment diesel belly tank. Each tank would be fitted with fuel overflow protection and the cabinets would be designed for secondary spill containment. Spill pads would also be utilized at filling areas for the tanks. A drainage narrative was submitted with the land use application, which states that the dual compartment fuel storage tanks are completely enclosed units and would not require additional spill containment measures. The previous drainage report for the development of the site analyzed the subject areas as impervious surface, which ercrpt City of Renton P/B/PW Department Environmental F w Committee Staff Report 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERA►vrls LUA-00-137,ECF REPORT OF NOVEMBER 14, 2000 Page 3 of 3 the proposal would not alter. The proposed generators and associated fuel tanks are not anticipated to adversely impact water resources on the site, including adjacent wetland areas. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Nexus: N/A 3) Noise Impacts: The generators would only be operated during power outages, with the exception of occasional system start-up checks. Periodic testing of the generators would be conducted a maximum of once per week and would be staggered so that all generators would not be tested at the same time. The timing of the testing would be approximately 15 minutes. Potential impacts from noise associated with the proposed generators could affect adjacent properties, including residential areas east of Lind Avenue (e.g., Talbot Hill area) when generators are operated during power outages. Although the proposed generators would be located on the west side of the building, there is the potential for noise generated from the site to be channeled upward as a result of the screening and may be carried further depending on wind conditions. The applicant has indicated the use of screening and exhaust mufflers in order to reduce potential noise impacts. The final design should take into consideration muffler placement, direction, and screening in order to minimize overall acoustical levels. Overall, noise impacts are likely to be limited and infrequent. Existing code regulations, including the maximum environmental noise levels established by WAC 173-60 as adopted by the City of Renton would ensure noise impacts are kept to a minimum. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A 4) Aesthetics Impacts: Three generators are proposed within three of the four recessed truck bay area and four generators are proposed within the fourth truck bay area—for a total of 13 generators with associated fuel storage tanks. The generators would be approximately 14 feet in height. The building exterior is approved at a finished height of 36 feet. Screening, which would include a series of metal louvers and panels, is included with the proposal. The screening would arrive at a finished height of 16 feet (2 feet above the generators) and has been designed to be consistent with the approved building, including use of base building colors and accent banding, as well as horizontal framing to align with the approved building modulation and provide unity of horizontal banding. The main building would not be altered and would provide a backdrop to the screening, as well as modulation. No significant alterations to the building design or aesthetics are anticipated from the proposal; therefore, no adverse visual impacts are likely. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended. Policy Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM December 4, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing. Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 110.B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)430-6510. ercrpt 0M 01 W NO Sln SWMILMS; LEGAL PE$621PTIQ1 `'�`` ( MAIM t312.39C 9I I v Ors z kD S P 9MA f4Q W9P1, • 1 y.,-�.e.,2 2..MAI .1M 1w01u1 1N013121AL2 m lY SWRi R.IiIN YIAR0E0IPMMlIA-91-Isf-mrG mlMn ].MUM SMACKS.fPYI1.20' 9� 02 IG M690052190I.k u SYA9�040 1.1.15.21E dt-- l� Olv6(ABM.03311(/Ve:4 Soh6 • •OD MI6 � Y8I0m0rtS•FROM 20'MIN.1102 LOTM M•36.1 SIM.. REAR. l3.%m, ,1II Y atS 97 B 1 00 6I 81 O NS N EM FMTPRINT•98,3s Y M.MYER.01 MAL S11EI gI a 9 p lr a a ].ME 01'E.1331, 98.752 SF MINIM tUIMiRO MVO I ] 1/-.1-7 r2 1 r c > (I'B.15C Q+S]IFICA 2-s .GS9K0 12.M/25..0 Y 1 0 m a I-IA[ILO,OVALMSIMI W/POTENTIAL 1 0 d 0 0 9.P.M MIRED, ISII6•3/1000 MIN.I.Y100A Mu 112.61.3111E AIM,20'19•SR. 8/ARR•1/I510 .115 1 6'18 5 MP.WOK,1//100 xiM.IMMO WIMTIN ^' 1 IV MR MC ALUM. MO, 198/227w M.MAIM ROM 210 AWM& 1 {3 �uk.11.MDDI KIMS� II.6EN m S10CILRE/III@,AI dpl.35 AWEl O a a 12.MM..tplSM.W1L l II.IN MOMS AMA 122,111 S.F. 1 11.1l2fiTA°C MO.MOM 18.320 S.I. I5.SMDSCR4 Y011Y0 MO,MIT.LMIIMT OM CM./1I,®9 S.I. 6.1 nh Y. MX.=MM.MOO.39,v91.I, 1 1 j 0.121. WIC.13 A00YISNIL M 6 10116 M1 • E0 IIMS 11 MUIR°31 1RIL 1 UNDSCAYIW MLR IS BOW NNMEO FIR1M IMMO BUM AZ LfRUrt1U AREAS(II•6.IN S.F.RIMMED1 fTONf nRRP.M IRIS W11 ER 1000 sr.moss 6 s 6 ORM MIMro VICINITY MAP l ( •6.106 5.I.REM. 2C.fPC. IdE Sreie N0T 10••i• 311MO.1M1U,1.P IS RIAR1033.ID. NORM 0 ( 9x 1 J 1iiiii... l 2i1 l I • . MN, nm ,> i a. ... . w Lsilie 3ATEA u1111 SW, c33Mt I • I ir : m m 9N �. Z FIMAof SP3 - _ (. m 1 -®r • _ a0E1LND - - �- - ^1 a/ alenuoorYx -- `� \�_- _Jq�' 1 d 1 ;.,. 8SI.IL8 3 N I �I i i I.,tir '�///�/ I �'' I �i, r_ 6 =---�� /a' -Q- --- `�d .`n'l t,a'°'1,wne -- 1 � m -- f1�1��11� 1�11�1 � -, I "�11�1 u sili. lIm .�3 ��a _�t1 i\I N Hof-,, xa 1 Kt \\\ M' i9r DtlP p23eaMw roo 1 's 9ls 9 l .c T\ 5 $ IL I(JCS FOOTp[21NT: 98,152 F. 1/110";'," ' 21 OM 11P9:1113482115208 ¢ 0Fompo goiNi. 9152•F. ��INi1oqIX� 2 ik /18012117 191,504-F.• m.nr 11`\I�• � ee' 1 -IXm cum.rrculo+mT'-2p amm. -ti. ' a l MAoL w212r ;��6,i 1 f7% // I ,,� ►!� I 1 L�- �r� ....E:--•'-%(-�-.... �� rim ... :_ I 0111. 1.57012/ 11 E PI I 4.1 1 A �i-r1 ; I ` �_ .. I °PIT ♦ - i� - F �- ---1 2111611de-- Ptc• l , minInisiallAft'l ' ', -Q---- � ' s � / rt OMR :m L.n'a9r ` x 5 ' 6 69_M,L2 -,R•mb,f q1 /^2� 1-� LIND AVENUE I = L.60 - 6 q i0 ' W a z • RN 11• • -� c '--e9L+`L.INp' FNU 10 o t' -. miuu Tide.; • L2+�LmnE:, •4V �- " -- I coam WP'-I-'I �\ i _____ ^- �s .o ...sm. sew \ _ / 2tt9ntltvIDrtbNHZR LOESN¢m0. •.r I . /00 -- • ODEm .9�"3933 W. o.. n v 0+1 SITE PLAN m I e I' j SD-1 • 6cnLe r.+a -1 II II3 1 ID I I _._--.1 10/12/00 4:00 pm C:\CAD\9830GULF\SD-1.dwg NT PAED RASNIG (� T4 Y 9 9 PANTED TILT-IP CCNCIWE Y Y y;,s:w.4yh., P �tl Ra a,, - "cg'r'"r;. '4s'f"� ,Ah"7r A;> ��'^,,,^ o o Y tY' ::•aa2- As:�..! ^G`..,rt..x.., !il ,* ; i ,f, .-t. 4 j. ..",IP,It :;7sF'.y.:€..,c : liE; :i 1, i't i, iI..I I 'r,+.. NR 'u�i,k!;.a.. ISM': '"-; `r+iY ; P la I; I41 i;' f'i''! f'.::^. I, , I.L,Id°.,a;, I I r;;£�,Iw, �fa'�, f '1 4. AIM�6�0I El t t _ . 'M P tHII,"' !i11ti�£`'1i�. $' y - ` ,,t :k: Far ., ; <? • «. r'1' - .. _'�`-• A .. "tea'.-� •` - 1 -l' it-N ,,�R ` t...._s-.,J.:.T• L _ (( a 9 O>9.ERATOS TTP. LNVERA TIP.1 STICCO SOFFIT Am ALI71'JEfT 4PDOU WEST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF I ACDe,CONANDCRETE BROTEE GLASS /I PANTED FLASNaY TILT-Up E B RETE'W INSULATED g c 13 0 0 (//PANTED TILT-T CQ1cREfE O O E,�••I•-G• O LAVSCdFE O ____ .G//// REVEAL B G METAL TIE BACC UN A `�l' � � PFid1 TIE BAOCS se r \� V�:'a MIL AIDMG .lh''v*`.:` � /.Syry't% I "vj. - '"'If- ,,ia'•ti.� =+=aY' Y-�'r✓- fi:.n r- T _ ....p. I �., a+5r I .p .�E'j - - ii''`` :?.4' ,n I r Ate.�y..t� .:z^. ."1 I?""}, e_�• [Ihr.{"" "'aT. .. �{" 9 F, "'G 1u3�,G a.%:S s '�`•�?%•,r.'. s..`.+`.,��°:'a» .'��•,�": . ;� z .., `��,�.,,.�, lIV ;' eI S ':° �; FT'' .�.."��%c,.�b. ..."� �.:,.«:•k°�x=�fa ".rti��"'" ,s �:.,. . ,.r. ... \Q t, { �': I EI yyi!I 11 I ;1�I "� adlol !ti 's""rc°-'f...x fa,. n 1' I16 It�s lytl£!ick C I°16�t+1 t 7f �'�"t£i $'£�a��I�I Ili �i I s�7;r;i�4�'I �'N• .:J �+�� fs't•:a x�, C G 4 " ,8��V L. m a iittiv1rN Iy3N'NIN, < r\" +'Sna " T;Jr'!c. tY,:. ,.. q" ::Yr -r':;,,c.ro,: ." .. v' t 4, ,r , :e ;a n•; -:1..k rv.ioyio,s: *�`0a€ .-' I .- r`%.61,, " fib•. ;F z { m x �< >..T I .",.r ACCENT WRIBART AND ALWIIFRAME(CLEAR U - ` LGENERATOfS TTP. MdM ENTR NCE OFin ACCENT Blum FRAME(CLEAR/YV LONERS ttP. BRONZE GLASS TILT-TIP CONCRETE RV NAILLATED PONIED FLAYING WEST ELEVATION NORTH HALF PANTEDFLASTR.6 I.ANSCdPE BER, s�uuui PANED TILT-Le SCALE:VIA'.I'-0' • PANTED ELT-i!P CONCRET 0 , REVEAL � o . 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 o o II �Qm I♦ �� 1 9 n1 n? I�M�� 12 3 ., !-„ I�I�� s s ■��il1: I 1= <w as wAq .... I - A A t z_i 11■�� 3 m �■��__l I A I 1�� g ��T _, j,.. i . m . Wit VEIII €5 Elm STUCCO SE FIT AND ` AUl'INJ'7 ul'fIDO,U M.'craw maySTUCCO SCRIT AND ACCENT BAND ,�,-` FRAME(CLEAR al/ ACCENT BAND FRAME(CLEAR,EV r-1 1 ERONZE GLASS TILT-LP CONCRETE LWBRONZE GLASS u m N°.ULATED TILT-UP CONCRETE LWLANSCAPE BERI NBLLATED — NORTH ELEVATION LANSCAPEDERT SOUTH ELEVATION PANTED FLASHING SCALE�Mb'.1'-O' SCALE,V5'.i'-0• PANTED TILT-UP CONCRETE ® 0 0 0 4 - A 9 \ f___._-_I 1 I 1 �\ • cnz ;I ,� i I � II: MIRE V I lk h • NRE OUEE'dD R11Wff OVERE4D VMIREOVERHEAD ` •E. ,e. I HAN DOOR L MAN DOOR MAN DOOR MAN DOOR MAN DOOR Z EAST ELEVATION NORTH HALF ta SCALE:VIA'.I'.0• /rPANTED RASING Qi F.-: Q n _�/rPAINTED TILT-UP CONCRETE- _ _ _ L W(/� G I ®D (' / REVEAL-\ (� (� (� 3 Z_Q 1 lldGCllJ \y z e o 9 f f i i i II j i r m 0 SE I IL � � I s RUDWE 0 ERHEADV FUTURE OYEREAD V RITER OVERLOAD MEN DVER EAD I `FUTURE OVERLOAD NETT OvERNEAD----� • I MAN DOOR I MAN DOOR DOOR MAN DOOR DOOR DOOR . EAST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF A-7 • SCALE:�G•.1'.D• 10/09/00 3:09 pm C,\CAD\0027NETORKS\A-7.DWG BEE SW A•T ! BEE BIFEt A-3 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'D 10 To ® 114 s5 w 1 m CD 3D 1 dram um= • .cl.11il= � — mum .. B.m..J• — - - a , a a n , a n• I. a , a J. is i I • 1 I I I I l I l I I I I I I I I I o 1 g T I C 1 i mi �\_�— e C 0 o- T . — 1 � J � i--- •f— t —} —t . -f- • t— I— I —fW41 b 1 �= t— f— f —f � ± •.� •i— t —f -t • -+ — - � � _{ 9 • 0-5 � . — 1— .4— I —I —4 •4- 1— •j— I —I -4 -I- --+ •I— I — g -1 •1-�- • �- 4-I— I —f - �I {— I —I --� e f, -- - o _ — N 1 ' .«Rum I ..... -i� r T ;3 i � _...__ sir--r��-''-�- � I I f - s `t i r._,� i � �I._�__\ J\l _ I . . l i ! c� \I V`I t . ! , , y.. 1 ! V 1f 1'.1 ! i I'G ;i , 1 1 !I')) I I '••� •' i , i V ' 1 0 1 . Fill I" ©11111111 o b b b b b ; �l 93 z, b 37 0 =m ii 40§ OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN l; Bale.P.30'-0° g P bC4LE i•.99 N am BEE EMU A-A ! BEE MEET A-5 ��• ti i. Q 1 1 I I 1 I I I $' 1 1 o I I I I I I f ' I I I I I f I . ©7, — — I— —I — _I__ — I— —I — 4_ — I— — ;4_ • — I— —I. — -4--- — I— —t — — • — -© �0 0 =` —1 — 1 1 l . — . 1— (Di- — - - - - - - - - - — . 16 a o C I 0 8 E. CO g CO g ob b b b b ;4 b b b 41 1 OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-i ECALE i•.9C' ... . 10/09/00 3:02 pm C\CAD\0027NET WORKS\A-1.DW0 • • • 1,•--2 . \ ------ /--•=nit-- --1 I,\ i I ti..ilit....Z7-47-1.LA) STOW DRAINAGE STRUCTURES- . 0,rrPt 4-46' 0 TYPE II-54.• ' OVINFLOW STRUCTURE CONTROL STRUCTURE SCALE I..44:7 .''' strk i I OF if L 0 T:i PER DETAIL,SHEET 6 PER DETAIL.SHEET 6 V\',‘ 1 II '. 1 . , TOP 14.24 IDA 16.00 X I (i..11.4-91:-/57-LL.4) trIE 10.65 15.If 10.65 T 6!HY is, agroxxxn T ' II MENEM MID MBERMATICAN Y-- . k, 0 Tr war IE 10.132 .• 6, 1 OAS WA'0 al I 1 fa.SON e . '1 *"... ."...-•-- __ ________ ___, i____ __________._ 0 L2'OUTLET IE 10.65 MAX Y/ATER SURFACE I4.24 ip,1 „ :11.11 \ / --:;,,,furg071470f(carTr'" 0.rrypir..-HS Es•r v.A Era NO 960.3.09 , ,. -- .,0.....„-• C011.6•060 I arrj=00 ......,1'. '''',... Top PERMANETIT POOL 10.65 1h4 g -,..,1 li I „ e..,,,, III lit;, ...,i , II,-, .---s, Ho ii :, \ N -__"-____---___.--____---.-77=------,---__ - -- ,,, Asrug,"41 Aeg ' Lor °c c' AR r ,- ..- ---., oi, 8 1,,,/ii'"1 :-,--- ;„,,,,.gi_o__._ __ _ ______....„.. , 03.0.7rPzi.5e 11-48.71:111 ,,,,iirlc r ,11111 I 4 NI I, i \ .\‘ ‘,\.\ . 117M‘\ ;10" IV,Al-'-i .. - --r7-----C - -'-------- gall i mrir,i,..__--,.... ,____.....-____--.60,-z__.9_:6-6.----=-,- -- -------_________. _.....-- -----' ---- -,-----, •ir moo .Pi = , l'illi i; \\ \-,‘`.,` ‘1' I ' .' I Al I ,P..trlY I - -----fr--- - ---- ------ 'r--T-----"ii -..77.-7 _.--,--- ‘',t,z-,..,-...-J,,i \ tompitinig,w7r:r--, 6 i 7.7. / ....1,--- 's alarcnoN OF FLOW I t Ai .-. CP7.----: i I' ''''. Lamm .1 f it h \ :2111. i : 1,Airix.-- ‘ .-----A._ / --- . . . -„--- , ; .„- , -,c-/ I l'i "1 Ara\ar STOS\.•0, \-FOOILVd;RAIN. - __.• LS BA...i 0, r-111111 -- ''') ' • 1 I 1 i -mi.r lo Es 0E-NA, reca nv.ro.::: / /.- BELDING TO SPLASH BLOCKS \ " •- '')1 1 1 F•31,-.dr: I .....--%\•_.-., i zi NOTE 1 • I UNLESS OTHERA1SZ SHORN. • .,, ' • , ....., ,., .....,,,..!j I.A2T_J TYPE I CB AT ct-Nrek, ror, j : _, I 1 • FF 19.0 OF SLAB ' mom 916 RAN POO I:0 illig.11i• "4 11-/ V• 4,111n ff 1 / '...., BMA..NornirmY/ /- Ili', A.:''',-,.i.,....01 ').1,1J i ) „I ..._/__ TOP 1723 ,...,_., rA \ I . NI 1 APP.ROX-LTDCATION OF ROOF--±----iL.E.-T"'EU,TO D''' ' \ ‘‘ 8.1 , ftik GRAINS(SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) ROOF,DRNNS 10.13E DDHILINED TO 90.Da,,,KE.TmEty.----,,--Ss.----,-LEL- A• ..._.ACCORD I ELBOW INSIDE CB i, NEANEsT GAT•04 Bps,.og coNNE0y. B.IE 1.2.33 TYPICAL 0 4 GEVERATOR i I •\ , .9 ,i, e , (er rurene,GOVONfruvi-- • / _ Aammor nay.. 7--7' ,... ---,'6-- y, ,.,.. 4,f,rm.Tg 0,a0GC-,. ,12,,,,, , r__ . ti, ,e4i, ., 71 ill ,i I .-- 11...--*;-.7' ' .# ., -'" " '11 ,.„ _ . 0- , 671`P`".?"WrE 1 -' VIM TO FARKING COT CONVEYANCE SYSTEM STUB&GAP PADS r FE laa, • . .0 .k.,... . ,,. :„. ,,,,,o7;VII 1 8'ID 1113 Pf°,:ritaTil' , 'II vv., ''.. MI `-' • STUB&CAP SEW@ CAP '' DE 1203 i 1 I I. .. • SW 4 CAP ' , • A ,lfr ... ,.w.,...,,,,,--,q.„\t„ 1 ,em Vow s . . I fg - MACE FM ora AM : ••II.1.60076 Te6'n6/2'.66T4 'i a il„; ' ,' - SFLE NOTE 1 BES NO.96070 8;1 i 11•••• ,, ,y :-6:--f-..7.-- 4 26EN...,.,eir 11-48 r ., -1,„ \ TOP las° L,,.,. "A us-Fur s 1023 Sk..6 I 11 1 1- - Ini 6 / \ ' A• NEIY T5.IE ID BrIET.'20• VS ........lillitt= ---,-;•-1„---'---- .1. -VP''',Fi- ftl;i ji It!" .4.111[1111114..% ..•* Q 4 _:_E N'TE'' 71.47 115'-e DA ki • 4 "" .5 i rr"11"1".,-.990,0 '".....,. ? . ----- 114 -• I. 411 -'i .• F RES NS 1.60.96 ty ' 4 SSC NO.92065027. 1 I 11 I '1 ''.-.2t"A 5:g Wil 4' 1 ill Utii %Trt.V.: ' 1.- - A• .7 0 0.50X 8.-0 A -.4: ____, ,, • r I • ' i,',-.a..-g.• MM. ,- • -- , . MN . --rEFL;STOOS 1 .'''' ' • Aii _„..." 1 '--1, '''‘•tpcs.„, ... i: thilo 1111.11 \ , \aiii iLlillkilitii .,.„ ,_ .r5•611.0...- .. ,,, 7..AA _4,,,,.‘ , Ai ..,•:Ri, .,. _=._____ipe.!-- ..`_ _1.064,1 4 ...\\ 44. • OM!.Is • I, ' -E•-slid, .../ . 4'. ' SE l'AAT.R24 A/N,,4 ,k- --,-;;- -----IRE•AIEmerter,..megrame - . .2....- ---1 ii'''''TORW.A.,,, ,...,.-...„. .-1_,W__ ... ....7.,......_.2.„.....,.. ....-IIMM.-..174'7 'IL.. A Al p"I'Z'cLr2Vr , ..• -rq-.;!-...--iiii------' - roy PEG 0 r II 11 I t IN • .___... ••• si• 119 CVO.Pao MS MCP ADASIST I, ,..,• -r-LaNt.4.7gellaiii. Waft- ------ "ff iii C AFa:)_____ J..6. --A•,,,,.....666., ./„,------ trip:70.E0006 •,.., . II ILI i i •• '4 - ; PINT*U'--: _.-.7--..-r__ • _ - 'lc ""a6,54/sost'", tli-a-RELOCalra-__,_ . FINISH GRADE ..- _____.........,----____L I I I C9?TYPE I . ,''------- - ----;';;--------Yu---.r--Z-'•'•Y-• ' ------• li 1 LI 1 POPREMIli. ME; 9E...96 - 8 ........-.....--4......iMr.MINI. .sumnima... LIND AVENUE SW r rril-43-.- IN *e, /- .. !,--,,e.457(E. 2 E--M..S alp 6. -----'''." --,-.7--•-- ---- I 12.IE MID-. 0 Am.. •, ' --•: __,,._ . _____,..,._.-,___ 1--- ----' . illi•s141.0111 \ I r ------' 7 in --- 'A.04k=--- --. -___ 7•, _.,, __ I OS _ R • _____ - I. ________ , 't, .-. • \Di -- _ . . !OP . ---__ ALL FLOOR DRAINS ID OE NZ,V,....LO - \\ %is I r .„, CONNECTED TO SANITARY SEWER. • 2nctium FOOTING DRAINS TO j'k ('4 / 0 I 'i #.4 , PARKING LOT STEAM DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE SYSTIat I,lk E .-____ --------,---___ HOE.si r4 TOP TZ• ..a , L. 105 13.E 1 15 6, I i mars kl 11 °31°3 I 10 V RI I I i .... SIDEWALK r r- L'. EX CURB 1 .. A ON V • A re fl. r - t.PIANIER p.,. G cosioacroo To Mar Eassmo Ems LINE AS SIAM PROPOSED • In 7.---'-'7,82-4-'---2-'"--- PRa'..S'ALE .11:1 28,1 .Ep a 0.58X.? BASE UNE TO ESTABUSN 606.WADE 6,2000. MR LANDSCAPE AND SOCPALK ARCA P.SEC.. 6'SIDEWALK • •••t_.!___ MATCH FINISTi , 4.. Nr .m. TREECE&COMPANY,INC. . t ma MITRE).. II /ffir'. ,,, 2117-41,: ..- : -- ;,..`" WI DORIS EURRIER--.. ....7 _.:. • SECTION A-A 'ME Nor TO slal c • , - ...E.AL 15.•° •-. /. r•1 ENOMEEENG AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS .2.1 wx,166...OW MO K saw 203 Well..MSS Nal OM tra-ZSTI rat(431$21-1716 Pa DETAIL SHOOT. V ,,V....QH,- r aseHALT CONOXL7E CLASS El I EIMIPMS 5/2/172 I CITY OF RENTON A4-CS7c DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P 8"IE TL00 EC 12"SD STUB lik 411. F STAMP NOT VALID PACIRC GULF PROPEEMES °e •- - iwyt,4:,6.?m,„1„,-1 cOliPAMIED NAuvE vATERFAL UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED I„,,, __ NOTE GRADING AND STORM i ,,,,, ,,,,,, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY IE AND LOCATION OF EX.STORM Sae TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTION . . DRAINAGE PLAN ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY COr TO sour ves.m.E. WO 4/05100 FZE......V ....E . VAULT AREA OESCREPENCIES MO SMOAK OW OM!MRS .0 sop i • . DETAIL SCALE,1°,20' t. 0so coy of poems rowans ime oar AC WerStpy BY APPR. DOE 0•66.,,.• .. 5162r, 5 Se, 0 • .01 : t 6 I 1, VI I i \ a., II rig eN sOzas.ln ezu uR A 1..---- a,11.1.300 MTTONIOOD \.• \ Ills• IIII I it \ �� it N.44� _-- - \ \ `` \ Iilj llrirt Iil +- \\ IITry lIIIU; II :S ID,,,,,,,,,,,,, , �1*?Li.4'tx00'LT',' - \�I-f0'A6'BEND(MJ 'arr f"'A7NG/B,. ;M y - .- -— --_ -=— _.f_ ,,Ill L I1 GONG HLDOG ' q ;.; j� r -��/� --ram - - 11 ' V 1 i�.. ,:§.a riri - ,c--r ,.p W.. r - '.S"74.-j- � / ^l.. -,i. 1r/All _ -, t/ -- - f - \ 1-3c_-,-- I Il \ .3+Ja0D.0 04'R � _ ''-� ... ...y.' '� �I\� ` ��%/� i ':E r�..', ..•' ^ajlj.. L=._-y�/ �ry�, 19 "''D,L r' 'J2 ,.. ..-t.— ,�9'-ia„ Y J 9MsB rl6.• Y1! g■ '� �. \• \1-10 6'Ii£(NNW a a, ,s. • "'Y" _ _r n ss s--?:oo'T..+.... __� (1".4M :l. - � ''....',::'ilk::'''',v. 1/� s, I°I 1-H'GATE VALVE(F4MJ)4 � ,' .. -I .a 11 \ w/WN'G B ectc,NLY ',DDCYA IN YAT/LT ' , � ''-`�. V! �� SCAT VALET 1 II AA -.� W/OC A I CITY /1 +]BD0.Q00'Rl 15•.PUBLIC WATER S .'•713:0 L-� V Nl /I1Y-)0'QJ'•CIo.&is,6. 1OV'SI0.DET (Bryv,1-10'GATE VAGYE(NJ) ENT(TYP.) �+B=ASSCK[IFSl j,. -"max �j1nlJ TQ00 0.00•RT �+s�1. 2P DGVESTIC 5£RNCE1 1-IDiB']tf(NJ.£L) ` SEE ARM.PLANS 9+6000,GOD•Rl ''+l^ �� - I\ 'f I -` ! r-f0'GATE VALVE(MJ1/+50.00, •.I•� I1=n1/rBEvD'(M✓ uETER • _r-6GATEvu V£(FLw.9 . /' ) i + Iff�TI ��`w/ca+c BLaDKiNc L' ' ._w/GGva BtocKiNc `� ILOr] / 1-rD;6'TTF(ueuz) \\`� r-rD'4sND(MJ) / �� 'IT L: '� 2IRRIaTTICN SER . ! IR W/ 041E YACIO FtrMJ W/CDNL: OCKWC -°+V + 1 II i / BARING ONE PLAN RN I ( ) -1 �' ,/) I I r / I I4',:sit M Ili LOT 3 Af1;pat mug 1 BUFLNGTON NORDIfFN W/GONG BLOCKNG `fr':• ,Ili \ Ir 1 1 I �( It I I ro Bf CONNEC119 \1 BS•NO.014-B� .,"�,' �ax'-.. //f 1 FT f2.0f9.0 nEC nu a r✓TO ` + ' I I�_ TO SANITARY strati I \\ J I I .'• I.��r 1+01.010.0.00 I FTc rvTh•.A I 1i• ue�m�.i� I ' T . / LOT LINE TO BE REA/OLEO& /l/ ,.'.•' r-10'45•BENDWI.,R I I I: Pi.., 1 l' ! / / :•,, W CWG BLOCICN. ' , i P Wm,oa ar aid �, 1 TIT' 1 1 225' GRID LIME/1 GRID Uf1iEg fB� (BY fUIURf BOUNDARY LINE y t' 'I'•• .r ) I i ) I N F c R x I. /A. ' ' IA: L .. (SEE ARCH.PLANS) (SEE ARCM'PLANS) ADJUSTMENT THROUGH" lCRTO UNE 25 d Ate/ ! 1N/ II ( I � I``/ CITY RENRh/). (SEE ARCH PUNS) 4 \\V 'F i'� I II' 9.w FTaEsL: 1 ' � C " .:.:. NE ig nor is T"`m' ei•e'"h J _ --- •`•.9i.'`� • `', ! ik `;5'.--::r,Yi._ ,.III �!':::.; • �. ��£i ig7�@p �..(-`:'`i ':, _ '-'1 -_ Z��1•�'_R\,,,.4_ 1 . `..::��i}rr. , ffer$0.00.,/ �R JO'AttYSS[ASDrENT\ \ �iS� I. a: ,;tY ,...;x.�.T:. '';r,�, :'.•, F>iaii�T� w.�i :•3'-% .._a a,rv'° 5S1' I iI II f �� t - I" sa D+: ' y./'Y�'J. :`r. .+' 'E i': ::.P�'�/',' B'IE 12IO 0U • i oam II' 11 ��]5 y'•\' .� .kf::, • \•1 .T1 ..- r .. �' }•� E11i O� ';'.: ; ��''y� '/ ) ` .,w-43'BEND(NJ) II. Y LJ rr -.!' .... .Ln./ . ,.;::; h. �_ W/GONG BLOCK,NC e SEnLY- � I' � T ( '('� ay.� G4' '/ � y sTua aiiR �,G I@l�l 1 .4 .. .'/'., -eJ�: ..;,J:f "„1 � •............. l - -g OPJ'FI R ..i't' Ij HALTS n00•'R•' ■ '' - -- - Y �A �,' „OPTIC LL^ .�"Mw,FG'' r, I V. I' IJ+7l O. •FIT - • . .: ':'.' :f...': � • ';,I(\IIi19.fOQ'�4W�R�'�j/"//ly. r ro:6•TEE Md'n) i -___,lv, - W �y_yp MIir1M -- - Y i,.. �_ :: A T-10W/C JILOCK' j G�, r-6'GATE vAe4E(R+M,B a< /x uxxl *� ��'8'J-I� " �..._.1� Z:,fE.N.6i-.J:,_�r_e r _��_(( W/CM'C BL�Q'wY/N.� W/LY1NC BCWIING f 'c ,'.i -1 .1 - r •-TGL0.L CLASS 52 I 1 • _ <� ' T;UNE ;_611GO�IKT TM �. � _',. •�s '✓ - -/� •�.rk=a �IOarE / I !fly —t-I6'AIO'TAPPING TEE YJxFlJ SSMH®4.--ee - euS sm0 AO" .` •` -J4.�ry. `�_ 1� ---_ I' G 1-10-GATE VALVE(FL•NJ)------_TOP MATCH EX GRADE_ m A0.UST EX VALVE i' -ft W/CQVG BLOCKING INSTALL'iTOE 7F-2• __BOXES 70 AN/SHED °' ,.E Esvr IN70.2q Q00 R 4 -J 14+52.00,Q00•-L_ • �° MATERIALS BY CONTRACTOR-n '�BACITROW VALVE GRADE LISP.) -,ps n�, UND A VENUE __ 1-16 af0'WET UP, '. „•I-le 22•BEND_- ��- _I TAP BV-5177-PPROVER"WET-T IM,16.50 A. - n �-_ _ 0 , --- �_ `- - P- - - ,EC.n0.slcel0xe05 --f-16.910'TAPPING TEE(M✓.FL W/GONG BLOCKING �,, s: SUB-CONTRACITJRS -'---A `A6' -gam if 11.30/N 1-f0-GATE VALVE(FLAW) -- tTK, �, --..---,---.SEE CQVNECTIQY I DEAL BfIOW CO lE 11.20 CTO(Wr) •1 `+� W/CONC.BLOCKING ��- --COMPACTOR TO 'IFY LOGITI ____ - MATERIALS BY CONDUCTOR, Av e>;amaPPRD r-aP_ -�1 I AND�ELEV.OF EX e'S5STUB -_ —__- `� > � � _ -= B \cra7s) r ELo(Y `�-�/ ` _ V. • 91R:2cra z OTSCxI-sn \ ___•o �• Iy 1 �_`� bLQIES I. ALL NEW DUCTILE IRON PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BY POLTEIHEIENE WATER MAIN CONNECTION DETAILS WRAPPED. SEE WATER MALTY NOTE 4 FOR STANDARDS AND SPELTFICATIGN7 2 GOP/ES OF ALL RELEVANT CITY OF RENTON STANDARD PLANS SMALL HE CONNECTION t PRONGED 70 CONTRACTOR WITH THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NEW TO'WATER CONNECTION 2 J SEE SHEET P FOR PROFILE OF SANITARY SEWERNEW ICY WATER 10-A10'IROCAL CROSS(MAR) 10'110'VERTICAL CROSS(AWOL) 4. ALL FLOOR DRAINS FO SHALL 8E CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY SEWDt LINE 1 1-10'BLIND FLANGE(ON TOP OF 1 r-f0'BLIND FLANGE(ON TOP OF a MINIMUM COVERR FOR 10'WATER MAINS SHALL BE J FEET FROM FINISHED GRADE TEMPORARY-9-9-10'5 CROSS)W/2'TAP&2'PLUG TEMPORARY-9-Tot CROSS)W/2'TAP&2'PLUG 1 MAMNUY WVER SHALL BE a sFET. BLOGYINC ��►....JJJ� I-10'BUNO FLANGE(ON BOTTOM BLOCKING fI-1� ) FLANGE(ON BOTTOM 6. ALL NEW SEDER'AMITIES SHOWN SHALL BE PRIVATE. �.Y.16'MAIN j-IO UG(NJ)/2'TAP& rE 16'MNN 1-I PLUG(NJ)W/1'TAP& 0'''. ]. 2 EXISTING FIRE FITTINGS•ALONG LINO AVENUE SW TO BE RElltOflTT£D -W-_ µ.- Y>FAIP.BLOW-OFF -W-� /y_ 2'IfMP.BLOW-OFF F WITH 5'STORR FITTINGS -�\ SFF RENTON STANDARD P/ANS-SANITARY SEWCfl `r-I6'rI0'TAPPING TEE(MAR) 1-16'.10'TAPING TEE(MAR) �.) s�' y SANITARY MANHOLE gOFI I/CONS VALVE(FLAW) 1-10'GATE VALVE(FLAW) -• TREECE &COMPANY INC. 5 MANI/O E FRAME AND COVER BO]I W/O]A'G CONNEBLOCKICTION W/GONG BLOCKING "' F•i 002/L/ERINO AND DFYELOPYEM CONSULTANTS CLEAN-OUT B016 • TESTING LRNNECRON TESTING CONNECOGN "1gyT,1SK'�9•Ib'�• is .9,9 814 K son no Mt*.••m.Vw Isom `I/es)rsI-son D.pm en-n,e f-16'rI0'TAPPING TEE(MJrn) 1-I6 if0'TAPPING TEE cams 6Y0/m SEE RFNTON STANDARD P ANS-WA R �1-10'041E VALVE nM/J N'�') CITY OF RENTON 1-10'SLEEVE NJ( ) I-IC GATE VALVE(RANI) CONCRETE BLOCKING BIM ( ) I-10'SLEEVE(MJ) - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS F. 8'DETECTOR DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY BI00 W/GONG BLOCKNG W/CONC BLOCKING• STANT NOT VALID Ii FIRE HYDRANT 9102 EX I6'MAIN TAP CITY APPROVEDTERIALS BY Ex 16'uaN (MATmr C/T Br coNmacTTaq UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED PACIFIC GULF PROPERTIES 4'COMPOUND METER SERNLE MIN 4'BYPASS Blae TAP C TRAAPPROVED WEr-TAP SANITARYTR PLAN AND r0'GATE VALVE eosl -W 1 T „RIB-CONTRACTOR) -W l7 1.,.-SUB-CONTRACTOR) WATER PLAN `r, FINAL C LINECTION FINAL CONNFCTION m'F''''�' eET 4r0 I/11iE0 DLL¢ /• (BY OTT) (BY OTT) RDNON, SRTM[R a 0/2Y00 nµve svrrAErO •.,; I Pa .v/ao �xrc•ED: ecr swe r..o ,un axe nwa ' p.n.s,. App. as AW0C2IIe .,.m...-..,�.s. T 0' R 46 • °"' '" 19 T23N R5E W 1/2 • L SW 23rd St. _ Cil / .', Id i IH 1 I � _ .- IL w jth ,St I, SW 27th St! i CA SW 27th St. � R 1 I M — • RC ll ` SW 29,th St ---I ---- y 1 . w I iI +I I ` I Na S Oth St. I i------ -- z z i� I N i I — CA IL N j - + II — 167 If i 4th St j I , SW 34th St. it I 1 • SW 341th St.! . IL 11 i f JL I H - - ,co. - : Fjp __.,/ .-6 //://,/-//•N r,_______....._4_ . ..,- -Ed cu as IL - I M------ --- CsSW/ th St. rt — CAFl IL' / ilst S . I M SW -I - I --- • — t. 41st t II -AlI L\r C' ' I3 • 31 T23N R5E W 1/2 G..�T o� 0 •1 H3 ZONING" • riairw Tsc�c,N,SERVICES o :;;:, 30 T23N •R5E W 1/2 L.ONING MAP BCGJK 1 . „ ..:TIPIESEIVIEFT1 W- EM , •I - - 'I M1 L II �� 7 I �:d it r 9 ' 1205( - • I I� � I 1. �, A I _� Ntag -_.._� �IfE•w i1`},J�I�,��;�::k i4.,. . 'R�ly.hu�' �' :!� �` �.� '�a.Y {�j.� �..::: i1' :. . ;1.4 R 5, " 26 T24N 135E , :::;•fir...'-:+ ',7 - _ '7'•' 1 .,� .� i{ ti i li _ i Tit , '464 Y F h` #4.4\117 .-,71 '•...*\\*- -- F. ' ii, •. c7 1 I t= I� r44. r .l { A '��1 r. •1 _— ___ «.;n b-Imo. Ir1_itil��4.�'='lli r.::Na>u:%i:#iw�' - - %-:t_:.c-..�.,-./ ,� J'�f5 � I A !iiI l ii - --- --- -- •'-- - --/`'\� � �► c. - aiiivizitilliirKi24N R5E zgkimtz7----L------3:71airomivicz..p:kaii ki\ha owl t ;.... kl.-7„-41a. , -, ,.,,,i .,_. ...: \ i•n�a* :"yS qq N)t II ,�j i is _ U �'+ Y.11 � �►1u I 3;(`3• R5 { ,2 T23N R� ,��I 1�� .� b�•`I it-\ II a..� /i•' �} -` —r I li `6M1;Ali._ ifitI • M1�* J i`I• �I I 71"\�If".!1 R � ,'� �t.{: I s1:�''I Gi i a 1�•7 1 i I , .a ,�� 01 q lit 1 111 :��" .`,4 �14 .sk 110 I I It�yy M1 �Rt _ il! II. V ..1 i' I Z. P , i 1 �ilr�fli � 1 M1 1,. ie7\'+r ` � � a 11 l� i t ill l i 0E1,.. .. Q, 111�I R5E � �# � rl 1 j : -3/0 .... — 0: f,.* Ili ; 1 ♦i� 1 tt VI' ' ,,-A-. -1414 rill-.-:,_ *17.A.it\ ,..,.:- .,,,..i .4 1 _ 1. •‘ , 1,- • .\,.:_. -,/.., . .,,,,,•(,,,fc.- -----, . 0 007,';': ,rii 1 . -It ,.. . - 6_-ji)1,6 3 1 . 1!1Il�lfr��✓r,ii.'�)l:.5E •: 1•,;F . ^I P i 4,' SE.. n �, fAli �- l �f ,-:, • ,; dile T2 N R4 LF Ii_lE{E 1't•L-fAI !pk...v•••1, , °I �� • - •T2 ' �=7" • /_ t-• ,° •_2 T23N R5H�y 23 T23N R5E I�11 I r �� i •172 '1� ��a� �' � 14 '' � �o ., Ii �; h: _�','l gem 821 _``� : (V 23 i i F. 1 -_- I �-5E •_ i 26 z _ 1t,I. ' .„ ° 25 "_'� ` 511 ,,! =l ,i.: 4. 25;f,,s�L r.�,,$, s ,' I _ ;, 8 I/[ �- I r-ii ,I 3. . . 36' 3N fT e 1 T25E 1. "3 3 13E• ,a5, I'3N R .. 'I' li .23N i 5E 35 T23N- _ 36 • �� 6 60' �� -- 0°j_10 ��. t P". _. 833 8 0,i,j !!! A v ,1.gal, , .s 11. _ II • 2 6 T2• .. 22N R4E NR4 I{I 1t— ;IV. -- 3 T2 R J - I 2 T22N R5E #_"-• KROLL `, " RC Resource Conservation I CC I nvenienca • mmercisl fP1 Publicly Owned R-I Residential 1 du/ac Ti1 ter'Neigl hood• Renton City Limits i • '1, `,.`:I+"•r 1 R-5 Residential 5 du/ac I—I Ce ':r Sue•'.an• -'-'"'- Adjacent City Limits R-a Residential 8 du/ac pi Cent. ' • ntown• ' •• (Grey Text) Prezones SECT/TOWN/RANGE Ell Residential Manufactured Homes Ell Center Office Residential SS Automall District A R-10 Residential 10 du/ac I CA I Commercial Arterial I•:•;•1 Automall District B R-l4 Residential 14 du/ac [I Commercial Office • For additional regulations in overlay districts tonot shown on this map, please see RMC 4-3. 3n RH-I Residential Multi-Family Infill I Ili I Industrial - Heavy Lo RM-N Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood Center I`—I Industrial - Medium PAGE la RH-C Residential Multi-Family Suburban Center I—I Industrial - Light INDEX w N 1318 Residential Multi-Family Urban Center* n Public Use X 0 0 co s City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ir e6i'. 11 xc COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2000 c. APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-137,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 25,2000 0 _ tip, APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira g CD FM PROJECT TITLE: 360 Networks Emergency Generators WORK ORDER NO: 78747 0 —i 0 rya .•i 1 LOCATION: 3600 Lind Ave.SW en T Cr) rt= ITI y �l SITE AREA: 7.39 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): � � o SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up F g g enerators o use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building within the within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105)has been previously approved. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants • Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet -7/nLiu B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh re additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dir or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 ( City of Rion Department of Planning/Building/Public-vGorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: EtovtowIL , Qt°tlelOIJwWATCOMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-137,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 25,2000 APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nis ' • Errp@ a 711 PROJECT TITLE: 360 Networks Emergency Generators WORK ORDER NO: 78747 LOCATION: 3600 Lind Ave. SW OCT 2 6 2000 SITE AREA: 7.39 acres L BUILDING AREA(gross): 197,504 q.ftcrQNOMIC DEVj LOI.MENT. NEIGHBOHHODU,-, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installati use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building within the within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105)has been previously approved. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic./Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATEDn COMMENTS N O J D1(C I SsOLrS_.(- fbGL- '57gat)tC2,1 c___ ifLIvUivinr— C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We hay reviewed-this�p lication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas here additional infor ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. A `, 1 0 0 Signature of irector or thorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COVis-h&LCho S'e,imca COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-137,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 25,2000 APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira PROJECT TITLE: 360 Networks Emergency Generators WORK ORDER NO: 78747 Oen r LOCATION: 3600 Lind Ave.SW �(z,,7 SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 197,504 so' u, ��®® SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up rcdie��--��-tiggggggenerators for use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel • nk with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building within the within the truc ,nay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore, SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan (File LUA-99-105)has been previously approved. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor. Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS -416644't4""`" We have re iewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wh additional information is needed t ro erty assess this proposal. 4/./346 S ature of Direct Authoriz epresentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F %JO COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-137,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 25,2000 c.3 APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira a PROJECT TITLE: 360 Networks Emergency Generators WORK ORDER NO: 78747 O �3 LOCATION: 3600 Lind Ave.SW � m S71fir' SITE AREA: 7.39 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 197,504 sq.ft. < n SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up?oz17 generatorr use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon die%el fuel tank with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building within the within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105)has been previously approved. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 41"(A/C r1/2102Z5 76 44 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS � ��. �j� I,/� \i/Am)e_JaAA___ C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 2 ?Ziesq .,' \z*LeAe el/,—/29(----4 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a itional informatio 's neede property assess this proposal. /o r' l/ Signature of erector or Authoriz R resentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of R:;.:gin Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F(ir• rreu ,Vl-f 10-h COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-137,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTO: $25.9nn0 APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT MANAGER:. I. eyiisnirE OWE laPROJECT TITLE: 360 Networks Emergency Generators WORK ORDER NO: 7. ;-y I LOCATION: 3600 Lind Ave.SW OCT 2 6 2000 SITE AREA: 7.39 acres BUILDING AREA(gross+. 19',504 sq.ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for he install.it• �� 'T 11 1 generators or use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a doubl- wall 4 00• 4.1:.7 .• ai �1 - built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building wi in e within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105)has been previously approved. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Tt e-t B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS / 1Od e-• C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS /7 aAdrs"• We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly a ess this proposal. /e/a0P Signature of Director or Authorized Representative' Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Rer...,., Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I Ira-VLSFoV*_ COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 20000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-137,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 25,2000 �F,OP APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira "Yr% PROJECT TITLE: 360 Networks Emergency Generators WORK ORDER NO: 78747 4 2 f„ LOCATION: 3600 Lind Ave. SW .�4d°�t -��6) SITE AREA: 7.39 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): 197,504 sq.ft. 1"..04,0i, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Thp applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building within the within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105)has been previously approved. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dir r or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Rein-on Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i1t • 1 U(euJ —(AYa - — COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-137,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 25,2000 r.� APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira '.r• �E" WM PROJECT TITLE: 360 Networks Emergency Generators WORK ORDER NO: 78747 , 1f..,r LOCATION: 3600 Lind Ave.SW 200® SITE AREA: 7.39 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): 197,504 sq.ft. " `ON SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building within the within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105)has been previously approved. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _ Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Aa,Z,Cekr B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • � --�� /% /cO Signature irector or Aut onzed Representati e Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Renron Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: au/We.' (�c�s e c�R112 V— COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 8, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-137,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 25,2000.,. APPLICANT: 360 Networks PROJECT MANAGER: Lesley Nishihira - Qi PROJECT TITLE: 360 Networks Emergency Generators WORK ORDER NO: 78747 007. -044/ LOCATION: 3600 Lind Ave.SW 66i6 • SITE AREA: 7.39 acres L BUILDING AREA(gross): 197,504 sq.#f.11‘4, 00/7 4,11, SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up to 14Urwrators for use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuetnk with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building within the within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105)has been previously approved. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More • Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 47A) • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature irectoi tthorized Represents 1, Date Routing Rev.10/93 VICTORIA PARK JOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 1104 RENTON, WA 98057-1104 TFIT,425-228-1570 FAX 530-326-4381 VICTORIAPARK@MOMF.COM DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON November 8, 2000 NOV 0 8 2000 City of Renton Attn: Leslie Nishihira, Project Manager Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Ref: LUA-00-137,ECF Dear Leslie, Enclosed please find our request to become a Party Of Record in the above proposal. Thank you for taking the time to talk with me about the project on the telephone and explaining the circumstances and procedures. If there is anything further that we need to do or if you need to contact us in the future, here is some contact information. Sincere yours, Alan L. Zullig, Tre eater For Robert Hofford, President Victoria Park Homeowners Association Alan L. Zullig, Treasurer Robert Hofford, President P.O. Box 1104 749 South 25th Street 620 South 29th Place Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 (425) 228-1570 (425) 228-1570 (425) 271-4941 victoriapark@home.com alzullig@home.com rjhofford@juno.com Fax: (530)326-4381 Fax: (530)326-4381 VICTORIA PARK 1 LOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 1104 RENTON, WA 98057-1104 TEL 425-228-1570 FAX 530-326-4381 VICTORIAPARK@HOME.COM "r;\r[.'_;��M NT PLANNING November 8, 2000 - r,i TY OF FEN i ON City of Renton • NOV 2Ggp Development Services Division 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Ref: LUA-00-137,ECF Dear Sir, Victoria Park Homeowner Association received the above referenced proposal and is very concerned about the acoustical emanations from the proposed generators located on the site. Victoria Park is an association of 248 single family residences located on Talbot Hill in the City of Renton. Victoria Park is located approximately 0.68 of a mile Northeast from the location of the 360 Generator site. The proposed site is located on the Green River valley floor while Victoria Park is located on Talbot Hill approximately 275 feet higher in elevation. The wind in the area is from a predominantly SW to Westerly direction, which very often carries, significant sound emanations from the valley floor to the Talbot Hill area. This proposed site would be directly in that upwind pattern for Victoria Park. As the valley floor has industrialized over the years, more &more noise has come to Victoria Park. For example,there has been for several years an ongoing dialogue with a wood products business with a dust-collection system located on its roof. Through discussion and compromise, the firm has taken commendable effort to minimize the nighttime disruption. Victoria Park Homeowners is very concerned with the amount of nighttime noise that 17 diesel generators would create. We would ask that the City of Renton carefully reviews this project making sure that all local, state & EPA guidelines are adhered to concerning acoustical limits. We urge that both the company and the City of Renton work together to mitigate the acoustical levels from this project that falls within the limits. Frequently, slight adjustments to plans, i.e. muffle placement, direction, screening, can have significant impact on the overall acoustical level. Sincerely yours, lan L. Zullig, Trea For Robert Hofford, President Victoria Park Homeowners Association P.O. Box 1104 Renton, WA 98055 (425) 228-1570 victoriapark@home.com Fax: (530)326-4381 • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 25,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service to the building and tenants.Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-la overflow protection. The generators would be located an the West Side of the building within the truck bay loading areas.The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary.A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105) has been previously approved. PROJECT LOCATION: 3600 Lind Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS).A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 13,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 25,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: Fire Department Tank Permits,Building Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is located within the Employment Area-Valley(EAV) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and the Medium Industrial(IM) Zoning designation.The proposed generators to be added to the approved office/warehouse facility is consistent with both the EAV and IM land use designations. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Regulations,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The initial review of the proposal does not reveal the need for additional mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 8.2000 If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I • • In I 1,•p S 4.1.1111 IYI ,, diiii Est • Il- iljl , M ..g_ 1 ►t 1 -teai, �lii_. J o :.. • l 1 , o f I'l r ■ III l All lir zoom t NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION 3 CITX 9F :RENTON . Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator :September 27,-2000 David Kehle • David Kehle Architects - 12720 Gateway,Drive, Suite 116 Seattle, WA 98168 Subject: Modification of Approved Site Plan for Pacific Gulf Properties . (aka 360networks) / File No. LUA-99-105, SA-H, ECF • . Dear Mr..Kehle: This letter is to inform you that we have reviewed your proposed revisions to the "Pacific Gulf' site plan. The site plan was initially approved by the Hearing Examiner on January 25, 2000. The approved site plan included a 98,752 square'foot building footprint for an industrial warehouse/office.building. The building would have four recessed bays with dock-high loading doors for loading on the east side of the structure. Based on the anticipated mix of tenant uses, 210 parking spaces were provided on the approved plans. The proposed modification would modify the approved.building in order to accommodate the future tenant, 360networks—a fiber optic telecommunication company which. provides data storage and web site "hosting" in a secure environment. The proposal would involve the following alterations to the approved site plan:. 1. Increase in building height from 30 feet to 36 feet; 2. In-fill of loading dock areas and placement of slab on-grade for-exterior generators; 3. Construction of 4 steel grated platforms within truck well areas for the placement of exterior mechanical equipment ; 4. Reduction in floor area dedicated to office use (from 40,000 square feet to 25,000 square feet), resulting in an increase in warehouse area (from 64,052 square feet to 172,504 square feet); 5. Change of exterior.window panels to spandrel glass with a solid wall behind for.increased security and use of blue tint glazing with clear anodized aluminum frames;. 6. Modification to the exterior elevation for the main building entrance by adding ' 512 square feet in canopy area; and, 7. Addition of screening from the site's street frontage for generators and - mechanical equipment. • The Site Plan regulations define a minor adjustment or modification to an approved site plan as changes which,do not involve more than a 10%';increase in area or scale of the development, do not have a significantly greater impact on the environment and 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 • - • - 360networks Page 2 of 2 • facilities, and do not change the boundaries of the originally approved plan (RMC § 4-9- 200.H). • The proposed platforms increase the approved building footprint by only 5%. The overall appearance of the building would remain as approved and no modifications are • proposed to the parking, landscape or vehicle circulation areas. The proposed interior alterations to the structure have been determined not to pose any impacts significantly greater than those reviewed under the original proposal. In addition,,the proposed use of the site as well as the amount of on-site parking provided based applicable parking ratios have previously been determined to be appropriate for the site (see attached letter. dated June 16, 2000). Therefore, thp proposed changes are approved as a minor • modification to the previously approved site plan. • The applicant is advised that all code requirements, conditions of the site plan approval and mitigating measures of the environmental review are still applicable to the development of the site. The applicant should also understand that Environmental (SEPA) Review ANIMINIMMEMMIIIIIMIIIIMI would be required for future modifications to the site plan, including the placement of above grounds tanks with a combined total exceeding 10,000 gallons in size. This decision to approve the proposed revisions as a minor modification is subject to a fourteen (14) day appeal period from the date of this letter. Any appeals of the tro admist alve decision must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5:00 pm, rbe5 11, 2000. If you have questions regarding this correspondence, feel free to contact Lesley Nishihira at (425)430-7270. • Sincerely, Cle" (77-4) Jennifer Henning Zoning Administrator • cc: Parties of Record /Barry Gilbert JYellow File • FE4 • • david kehie ec August 15, 2000 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 • Attn: Leslie Nishihira Re: 360networks .� (Former Pacific Gulf Properties) Lind Avenue Dear Leslie, We are requesting a minor adjustment to the approved site plan and elevations for the new user, 360networks. As has been discussed, 360networks is a fiber optics telecommunication company that provides data storage and web site "hosting" in a secure environment. They will need to do some minor modifications to both building and site to accomplish their needs. The following are those modifications: 1. Increase the building height from.30'to 36'. This is to accommodate the greater clear height requirement for a new second floor within the original footprint. This is still within the code allowed heights. 2. In-fill with dirt the existing truck well areas, provide slab on grade for exterior generators with integral fuel cells and provide screening from the street. 3. Build exterior mechanical equipment platforms (steel grated) which will be screened from the street. These will he located within the former truck well areas and will be 20' x 50' at three places and 20' x 75' in one area. Total square footage will be 4,500 SF. (approximately 5% of total footprint increase) 4. The finished office area will be approximately 25,000 SF whereas the previous project had anticipated 40,000 SF. We don't expect this much office, buter this is what would be allowable by code. Therefore the trip traffic generation will be considerably less. The balance of the building will be of a warehouse type use for electronic equipment limited. 5.. Windows shown on the exterior of the building may be of a spandrel glass with a solid wall behind for security reasons. The glazing may go to a blue tint with clear anodized aluminum frames. The overall appearance will be substantially the same. 6. Modify exterior elevation for main building entry. Create exterior canopy and full height glazing. The above modifications are minor in nature and do not: 1. Involve more than 10% increase in area or scale of the development in the approved site plan; or 12720 GATEWAY DRIVE, SUITE 116 (206) 433-8997 SEATTLE, WA 98168 FAX (206) 246-8369 i Ms. Leslie Nishihira - City of Renton Re: 360networks August 15, 2000 Page 2 2. Have a significantly greater impact on the environment and facilities than the approved plan; or 3. Change the boundaries of the currently approved plan. Based on the above, please approve these minor modifications. If you have any questions or comments, please call. Sincer- 11 Itit • David Kehle DK/mt Enclosure: 2 full sets of plans 1 full set of pmt's cc: Barry Gilbert w/enclosure Tom de Wolf w/enclosure • a:\0027\citylet8-9 I • 10011K.lllt IIIII IIIll lj 1E6/1.D£YR FSI•N I.MUM OOMesl 'r9 ��1)PP� I•:).a I yr./r Kama I�,.N-•w 1.tmlW1.!Baal nME111KI -/ ! •b H>I.+Ra 4WU/MO of CCU, 1.M 11W IIll•mt•tbll•11' y (_____r,____--------' alort«a.wmr1 Ru.O( 1 P.-�SIX.VIE aIIR.N an a RLtK MA,"o.i,Rt•] r.INC../catmaa,•MT.tF R..aR rm rvn•w•, l�'a�"° - ni.croa Ryoa S.SIIOC RIM/Sr a.»w(II ,I • lllIM II KI rm nl,N1 %I I r 4 {,Rr4W.(M la•ilil A rlm MIME no Mks aRI '�{ i\l, MINI REM. 11,131 Sr ,.MI P lrlratlo. pp1•7IM1(RI Ia INIIII i(•I I.II IURIIIMIM/-O,1((IRDXl 12.01/1,R1 Sr t!� 11-WOO=I1t,1Ra k) I 1 F• I-Mt.0140,MWIT(nll ■ n n I la • ,.:IVI RMRP 0,10•Ina!a..I.raa w ae.la•nwu •1 H I I IL•tl'11'ill. wp04[�1/ISI1 • IS u•1 r1 tD.K,Kvcu Itu an•:v:vl mIa•IK I h i CF E( ,t'sIa SKY.110 MK• Iwu°S ./ I 6 1 R II.rw.11a saw•u1 IKPR 1 a g II MOM Riaa• a•a(a Is ORrM[mm1..nm,n MCA MIK/R.If.+RKr IV aramr•lax I I ( I m.ulw,Kt•lu.a1 I.I. I✓ !J ' II.IK0SUK,Iu.R•eK•KW a.II1,r, 11 ItUMIAK MARC Or.WAWA DWI MI MS 111.Ir1 S.I. • . II Mk Iu,IIRI KKla(I*IRKS MrKal a.SO S r. I LI • Ian•1,•M.,a Sr RR1Rt1 IIM IS•la/IRI I.u•,, u f.StY�plp 11 RIW.tarts a'.;Rut uRt on •1 In••,I11 SS RI HK.I 11L. 1. 01 I r.,Rn,(Il.a. �ICINITY MAP a rO*1.1W MI OM Mt.tr.MIK.O a O Oa a'a. • , M rrotlic L i iniaaui.IMM 1.0.0 R. wl TO KM Q I I I I • / / I M __ ,_ . —� l I J ,R : K�K, �t —� • ` 1 l'A aP.Mk... \ ��aaa. ,/ _ r . lino Xrs� _f I ....ell 1•K�• ilRli __ Na --_ - I .• ,•nc.m'�^' ""�a1 K.w J( ' �s[p .� a t • I t -0r --r�� vim_ : _� ds -- rl.tCy a--- r0 1111 — 1 , . ''',:r? a: I 11.+1 1 a a— I i _ xi ,I I»I IT!Tl % •;<,. a' ° 11 :; I '� ff I1 I T 1 Y I ; Y}w A ^ /1 4. R a f YG " it r r 'r 7.I �l":� ; .rvni -t • \ k{ y} a!i}:Fp. _�: M1 a:•— .f}-1I./r•IY,. 1_ M -LI B1 I— parramroo f r,nl.a R:f 61A : •' i r • • t• tt` .g- 111 PROPOSED%LINT,*FOOT.RINT: 38,152 F. 1 . — 1 6 47._ of we..ro:/ • '� 1r llSpn Klp•R Kn1.La Ir.1000 I a SECOND F-OCR: °B.151•F. 5 —M. —1 / i arva..Mew+ t� d 1 ` . I /«RK�a.a..a 19 �' •F. I 1 1-�1—u,euaw..la... ir.r0W ; I mR.re.. v Sr Sr »I , y MI M 1tiC T Mat lfa.M K ; oaarsatWCK la jI.1•ratran(OWrK a*A4:.lraaa W y; n L • ' 1 I • -----...,1� ';t a rr A it s r •r' r.aee/[AMMO i I I;:;i:1 L tl.D W 1 ,zR«.y K :m �.. .- — F i /N 0.0 j 11 A WA 1 I lab IRIS ., :\ Ili !I 1'.d 6.' rl'r Ji a IRI A..61 >.!.I I Iri .,:, i___ •a, - .\. i IA(itc 7. ! 1 5 i nCn �. I II ,v __Kr___=1 ,�r fr• 1a� 1 �1 1' lam.. I I I I r 7"' ( I i i 1 II' II'' I 1i i i� f' pT; i • jy i �'°` --- b ® - ....a..a.r�� 1 r� aK.r f •• CIF y •:C1�r •@ i ' d 1 R/ OM1a•t. I_ •PIKt -�_ _ (RGNM•ajKU _ •_ a' — —M,,; .act • .•a , 1 !�1Z W 1--1 LIND AYEM1Eb� L ti , WC,�Mr -— _—_ - =R1 FFo$p� c o G . 1 CL • fir" - a MIL,r �- �• �»"'vmt I$ � CD �� ` t t• ��__�_ `�I'"^ 1vD q�,E lye -- �' • • MoanmrnmwarKra.t.INA1nlRa _ •Mar!•7400 WO tMKUI MKTIli raf: -�: / DO.n 11:11.00.111 00•141G v tr.0.0. cml i J j f (n "(''I 1 SITE PLAN P Stttt,.il��i m i,' ,i. : I SD-1 \ 1 ..I S • 00/16/00 09:45(aR G\CA0‘593CGJ'_it5:- eaHEST A•1 I 612 INEET A.3 Q . O O + O '0 8 QQ ® Col LI II ® (w') e (� u:j �I p 7i 7� ail (1. pe,.) i7i• ;j n ow 51 (t1�r7 , �, ++�� .J• .-- --3. 1-l' n "-n•-1--r 7E -- -�, -T --, ..,- , T---T I • ! 77ca�a— _.— .._. 1 A I ' I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I }! I c..)- i --;-, 1 I _ c 011 t- I I t -,I . f— ► t + I —tfi ;. i I —t ;g ©;- . .I— ,I— I —I 14- 1— I— i I i I I . • — —I— — I-- I --_I -4 -_— — I I ' (- I1, --1r Tf -'- { ^I I I ' 1: I' •.:.gip 41 i I 17. S S d i ISJS1 l i l • I I•iSL?SI I I. I I iS�.S' I . I Icy S' 1- / g I 7 6 IO (D� (J , 71 (� ]1 (7 687 7 y` n OVERALL FIRST FLOOR PLAN ='r="wL 1 •iCJL6..X 1 I W aET A• I EET A-� kr�a F O O O O O ' ® ® I ,, -- ✓; 17 »� ji -7 r- �r v y-n'-Km _ • illi ,?1 � . I I 1 I I I °— 1 I I I 1 to L l 1 1 I _] —° o— — ' 1 I I I I ' I.'-'-.''' I I ' I - - 3 o — —1. — 1 I — l— I — ' 1 — I -'— — I - - C O ❑ ❑ E7 = D I E - - - o- — — -0 3 z I 1 c tii4 lJ 6, V �J Cl by ( , di, (A., 67 1, 1 I OVERALL SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-1 8u:r.I'.70'•C 08/18/CO '0.08 om C.\CA0\00C7NCTv0VAS\A- . - ... . -. . . o 1 (Si (i) (A) co (i, (1, ((-3 ,;-.) (6) (.,) .n) CiCa'; tii, tie (1) r T -, I . _. I f . 1 I 1 1 ; 1 ,.• .- te• Re Tr te 5e . 1 - I .1 I . , I I I I .re 1 T 4),. I : 1 . I I I . • ; i '''''. 0 r e 4e•rj I I . 1-` , i . . . , II I I I i I i• I I , ! i . •. I I •' . I I I I 1 I i I 1 1 , . • a I • , - i . • I a I I CI • I I I I I I I I I I i ! I ! I ! . I I : I . , ' • I I I I I I I I I • 4 • I . I ... • I 9 . • . , . 04 One 1.04,4r 1 \ Ir . ... ..., g 1 g• •••••••.;-I . i [D3177".. . . FE I ; . I 1 IW3E77 s'LELECIFICAL FREW, . SPRFFIR P2SER I I , I I ELEverev ,__."_ i .•1 11 • ERDEDSLiLleL2KTILVT:_.2..22..n Tra*._TFE --, Yell. 5.3'52 If. tEdLED COCRETE FLOOR. . '.- 0T,. SETT.TEATED 5.6SE • a .. _• -.-- I —. • Her-trail. rte.- • • 5:526:5506565 Set.TO',le 4!DEOMES• I I- -I- I t I I -1- . RCT't MO..ACO2 R.1 • . • OCC.PANT LOAD Ill CCOPAVS . t 2 EXII5 RE02:5 1 Z I I I I ]/ I I e ' . TRAVEL DISTATC YAX.1140 Ar. , . I I I I • 0042523 I ' • . ti • i , • N6 ..• o __.t.. __i ._i 1 ._.__ -1- 1 •. I ;, c,...‘ 0 'el:•6POR 154635.41 I . . ',f _ ,- 'D'A.CCITCREM/LED ' 1 ' r TrP.PER DOM I I ' ' CAR 6'RE0R6N60 GRAVEL -...... MI .1::.k S)(j . P PEeOLLATO T CH • I I I I il i I • •I I ,cp. /-1).14,10,3 SA,:SELER li.'TIN ! • TI • 4.:0'n C ce. .ca. A .•- Ai —\i/— i. ,A F. AF ,,i. I __1_ _ I AAP ' il •••62•-aL -4- I I J ' ‘_,..r... ..,-4ar...,- . 0 1 —'4 , 1-1-1--I ,- 11-:I 1 J J's, 1 AE • POTE511161 MICE ,,':. -- ."-1.7-r . f- T71 :j- --ii 1 : =mm:4,.,-1 . ,. , .13.-. • - o 2'SAND OYER 6!IL VAPOR BARFJER i OAR 6.MU DRAN6G&TAAL r;-s .).10''''' t.1 ' ),....;•''P.1.-LTFI'',.: ' ''''''''''-'..\-j-,-,-J:s--T.-^-"..-;"i 2'EAT.0 CNER S TSL 5,15IC/2 BARRIER—1 k.::...j, 6 je;:.t pt; 0 ;••••• 9 ......,„it" OAR E.FREE ZRcelea GRAW... T' T-F........-2,-,,,,._.•1_,_,,_,F.- r etratz&ang • I : 2.SERUCAL 12,0 4 • • T AMON.RAO f ! ...1.1 Kyr'- , , I PC:METER F.:SULAM:TT T: • ' PEFDETER FLAT CAT. : 1111 --j ;CARTE:FULD:le ik-i* •E 1 I',_ , Ian:.., 1 • • • • , . . . - , I . • ; ED . r i I : • • . - 1 rig a I • —.; 1 , ' F.:..'q :, 0 0 — 1111111 ' -.I J L. •-I ' • • "--- Pill 10MI'— ...•.• 3.. ,66.. I tE,E , 1 1 ; - i 1\ _--- 111 • I I I 11 1 1 . 1 : •,....4 , I, I, ;'1 i II ! ilr.1?).%r'121'6'•1 1 1 ••-•,/I ‘___L.0.,... Fl 1 I : , • 1 • -,-- ,, 7,k j • 1---T-L--' I i I I ..:,. 1 ''' I, :;:'1.• ' I I. 1 I . I I I :, ./I 1...A.51: li. " 5 .--GLOD4JeZRSAV"1" .1..1-- I II---41.1.5.1.5 4,;! .1.,.. 71 1 .1 I\I 1.5...15.0'(..... • I ,•, , ! I I I ,_ . .. .,. 1 . .2'..?:._AI., I 1 11 I I . , F sr Iv r• P v El 1 (1) 1 1 ' CRLY.0.00C Ur:MANS 0900.6041051.21 LIMO, A./TCeLeE AYR1 1A1•O.ADLUTAEIONFCFT DCLOOCSRE RW RUU AFFLTAMCIA eN•C MLKATENDE E El;;14.1 MIMI)Er 5404 NOP d•5 e , F 4 1 4PARTIAL NORT FLOOR'LA -• . ..• a .. 14 AMP Ce&XereIRE‘Eel 3 t,0 1.4 OREA111 1414 t Ellxl. =niii CrIrCER EOM VI'114416401.D.S.EATAR5rxe y ScaTe.'re.1.e. a,Ro 1•ER-OSTAT MOOED TO 1.CsER sx.st 414E.N1 AD - 0 nal WEEP.cRE-ecr%/FE IRIA AV XlS2. E)ERERRAELE tummy 0 me,vE CAPABLE CF PREvEVI TO 4ATTTO A130A AA DEO 4 '4 SW•WE DOOR 10 MON OCCOOED EXIR/U 5'''Eln.5AC'"P 44)EG'IM I 'd ' 'EWA PINE Arrfx.o...ERE DeELOPE lecunErEEE.-E ARE DAMN 14=5%NSLARED CLAM MCA) SOT:SEE STEE"r-S FOR DRAFT OATANS r...2 AS FOLLOte. • 0 e. IT DOOR MAR C I SEE r-EARREA ,F, ROC LI•0.10110.R.At 5•1041.0.149OrL0.445 sex leen fteiloXAL OvIRMEAD MGR PaRlIC.e.LFIT 81,0E LATER.WORIEVE DOOR MD IDDERICIU .PROPOSED S1FECTV4E WAS RR 0 X.11 NSLARel AO0.1 n4 DORM r PAM ROO PECK . TAL 02 C. CO•X TOT k:U.013 METAL DOOR CT val.00 FE PEXXIVER NW-A.101 It BEFIS rRovrdev AI 4.1.MIRE OM MAWR 0004•Jet)Rom Aga CUR 114 U or....2 erse 40•OMR BARRIER VI-ErrETO!LER XX?.141..£5.LCCKSEE INXESAXI)MAX WA e MT C.P.EA404 WOO,SEAllEx51710 .c!LAO t 6111, tro..7115 e.l.PE WTI MD SKER A IrtAi X.FROMOENt 0 CCIINHATIO4 Rev X MOT tECTICHAL 0/ESSCAD PACKASE.tL.O.LABLE GOUGE RaG..14RE.a.SE 15 OS tir-tS DOOR lVERICAL ME SUM I.MCA NEOPRRE =SR SCLARF.COT Ex-ERCP 01-11.1!RYA,I EASED Oh DOOR BOTTCTIMANT ETNEN01(111.6.X 1C• 15 sur'S RIR 1.4CAR 100114E 04 BAD MS PERI.VER A'Co MOLLODTZTAL DOOR 11.1•2 DOOR CE 41114 X' "ARAM let MO o)DOOR5 MOO AT ETC LAM MA SULL MI ILIMWER(PORED) SOAK FOOTAGE. A—2 slARDOME 1.0411•Cx 5533;V'x CEO•43.316 Len &LOVED • SeEPSCE olleNO, 1161 J x 1SA•X.ALI WM Eli'16 x ebl..TSTr. ID. TOTAL DOER CR•4 th:1 warte OBP 8/00 '0.20 Te^ :I‘C 6 4‘0027NET.CRRSLA • . , . ...,F., ,,,;., f Q Q p 'i' YW it re ic — --- - — i t I i i ,,i ' I- ' t`rI I I I I i ! H I I I 0 to J 1 I Ea7—1'.---- I 1 I I �'�j — • I i I I MR1J, DMAXOPPSi'TO MAR 17 DEGREES I I • I I I ROM 64LLaixN R-II 1— 7oDC :CM ws X` I i II i I ..... I ID01JJJe. ! 1 w - I I I B;I I ? $ • 1 ' Et co I - --- - I_ 1111 • I f - - I - - - PPE BMAID r,0.EA DOOR. — -1 NUM — E�co_ I 6.w Tall, ELEt \ lcI J. .• 1 II •, � =? Fiji x I I _i�.4L--i--. I .. 11r p - I I I I PoIENIiti CfflfJ: ' I `I I I ' :C1Eh'IPL-G7f1LE r% f -I„ • 1 A n .'�-JiE} 7•,vp PhR 61$v4ROR BARRIER) r't E l Y r 1- -''-1-it E I O•ER 6 in.yAPOR BARTER-• �--- OVER 61 FREE DRAW%GRAVEL I'�.• �, OVER 6 FREE CRAW7G 5RAYEL 1 Y i / anew J'rmrca.a.m r vER-AA R•n h------ . }. I E Du volo6F%1 I , 1 PER,ITIR NDILAi101 PE0•'E-ER AELLA•I°• •, I I II r' / II 1'r4i,AN- FP 11 vv �� a =� ___ :�aea=se I __ # �— _ -- ---. r / I �. 1 11 i I I �Si I �, �� i'I I` 'I I , I I I I cuaR 1 { • I I A'• 6,1 I I1,,,I I\`I i I�'.- �1{�=i• 1 I I�1- r=.Al...Ka.16imEi At.,a•IN la I I animus Low. o u ' ; I MAAR aE AWE e0 WI WR611R, . 4I I I I i I Il.DER II % n• ^ ,. D____y-_._-n'__.._;.-.�••__-� •• }... ?�_.__� BARRIER FREE RESTROOM FER91T a a f ra • E xuc 1r••-I_a .... U FW6m ClL.6A IA.e. irn�•^D.^? rT'1^ 6aro Dan.eaAnw 71 TJ , •; JJ I OVERALL FLOOR PLANl.7.19.4111 1�fr.�° � —Q I ,LAG. y a O70A1CiER L LL6DD, yg 7aAa Ae••r.e• �- �r'..G� A CIA 66•ALDnAM DOon Mu SUCH P'OW! R❑.I,d E,nlrn6'¢t nK CA hex MRD. .uE•••9C i ____ 3 10201!LG7 LAY CLOKRIRAIACE OnED{ oMLL MIRED Ai 601 Oa.Ai r A••/ 0 a C66EE4 LODC VP TIaE•JELD.LEAMR!DCP • 1 iv DORO.'slat OP-E(i 11C:nLLNO 10 EJ NT7flt .11D1U0ED a DA.D,V ON•MS DOoR TO WIARDI11670 DAM Da MR,BsOal•ND ELAM LiWA4 DAWN Wier.AL4AIED A ALG N•0A1 *F-- /nE�` © soon MARL r DQ 6020LE, PAMRD•li..lC.• W _ _ 1fnA1NNM e C'e•x wan ES 6110L OrEFACAD DDOR L— PAPArou6°W.BP MR ^ 101701(ARIC l LPL{SLOE ura,Ea7ma DDDR END r WUH]IM:ID IML ` C DORM(PARR SLOEIDGERSCRAD WARTED/ C 0 7'0•x J'e•1xALC0 KTAL DOOR W 0OLLO➢Ki4 I Aw Mire.sal.JA-5 MOO DCCR r JArD L01DE NO CCM la ►I( �� mm C.NRr.PIYi6.LODGE?.MEWED MAX y'{ i 10 DAD MP Ur.LTOI GLIN®.LEATKOITM. I MA.61Ra1 DsxT1 COISKA1 01Xr x 1Y01,NCDOUL Oh0E6D e0.m Mtt Da! DCoit r1ER10.1L Lai{ALEC LAIC Al'tom pot I•I I.DER TI DDaADmn WAWARDrtraa{R J'D•xTo• TYPI A R STROOM SECTION PERMIT WAIL'S KM k DOOR a0 DOOR Cl 01D 6• WED-LetEE6E.ATER woman CAPUD, ��x..r.In-•r-o. QED. A-3 08/16/CO 10:07 am C.\CAD\0027REIVORRSSA- w I� 1 I 1 I PIete • i I I I I I I R. a i h I i gil • I es ..o.:P_KR ..„ . 6E&ED C I EALEO COY51 ,LCOR IlEMIAEATEO SPKE Lr eeRN P sm ,Eq,CA•L•5E1 rot AS cEcREE5 P O R07 P7xf.L1�01 R-1 H II fi I I • I • u `E I ,1 Ex1ER'cR PECRMGS rJ.1POPd' FAIIRICR'ECYA,7LLL 0.ATCR7 - I'� l ' I In 1I—J _ !_ I I ! 1 I I . tj :.nfli �EF.!1 ©Wil ■ T L� iiiiii i ii . 0 ` 3 3 I I n Ali 1' x 0 Di J b,)(E. ,o) :II) PARTIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN 51 01I re ,CrE.SEE 5,EE1 A.5'OC GRAE-CLF'A1,5 Ls. �.L: 5 C.Eva SK,t•w5 a 11 x•w 0 ^A rr.p• .1 rw 1 niw Jr J:o, n 'e .. •.o e. o. Kro ,.a ,+�•� Ir e• ,1.7, PP, n,e nor EA G.�o A� cr. I— I a114/ I.., I • • H i RD I ,. p n.a ,gn N.r n�rr � :. 35,1 AD,. RD r N�r r• NIr '00 C� r 1 I I Me., I l A I V (�) ;ej :e, :n) (A) Im m) In L)) ��) ROOF DRAINAGE PLAN RO A.,»•eT,e..M.1.V..., a,....p..r uz... e um War 0 Dm.e.ePP A, �"'El� � e' A-4 eCA-E I••Kr 00/19/CO 10:21 a•'. CACAO\OC27NE'VORKS\A- 1 n �j ». ai ,,, ail . I I i • • CS) . I \ I1 1 i 1 . J i I--CV1 CCM DCR I I I E'R7POSED SECCTO ILCGEi I I SEALED C[w.ETE ROCK I [ .'t H a l[D YK! I IPER"_'IAI[ET IOtLLt aSOLaREE![ I I I i !I '' . ROC.WLL 18 R-I' MCP de LOd7 a0V—PAVE %� 100,25.15 ; !z$ 1 I I I I .. ' Ig .1 fi — •__o g 1 • EXIERIOa 1-EC.dIC L PLAT[CFM EXIERCR PEC4d fCAL•L6.04,' • L J L J 1 i , M M v A T v u V is (J 6i1 11 PARTIAL SECOND FLOOR PLAN SU r:ve.r-o• • eca.e r.dc rU• • I, 3 z q) • 0 C cc c • • A-5 00/16/CO 10.09 am C.\CaE\0C27vETv010.3\A- Q rr 61 ;� PAPCEDq_YC0 rat ci, 1 r---PAN'EC-:.--W CCY.RER 1 • ,�� 44i I / / REVEAL-- .f,Sl 4shT I n..S:EGIx ��-a • I i1!1 1 ! r I! -174lf1�.It it r• �61 to 41 1r%7si47+ y.. 0'.1 V �' 1il� 1 `r,1 fti 19.E r ',FU3 w h1 S 13$i�t � ' if �� I 4til - . �. �.1 ,k:. ...b1.I t" I'• ill f• fit I I �:,..- .#::,,.. �.Ilt.d'�;, �'L•• 1I , I 4 1 I I {I,�, I!V r I G A'I R i7i li�f9 �I II YN�iH Idlldt lIIL 1 , :' i Etas'+ 1.: I 1.1YI.?•,i ,: EY::.IY �a1�..L•.1 I }Y v�..-92-41 1 1�' .-� 14 r, :�•'r 1174`Fs. 1';.-. .A'111 ,:'111 tT'h�.•�i.44l zl: • •• LSNCC04+rn ANO •II AL.....r MOO.` k I 6 LDuvERS t1? ACCENT_-�: PRAM/C.EAR/Id I ORME • .[—PANTED ILdJ•INO WEST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF TLT-IPc;..:,E-ELS, : .L C 55 I•%1 rPANTED T41.0'COGfE1E • E:vb.I.2' _dNSCdF:2.L' i O 0 AL O �e� C O O tALLIX neev�dEusArn 1 il 31 ry nn:l DV, I - 4 1� ! r i a 4k 7 I' , ,Y .,: 1' &41 V i 1 1 ,� it i;Z i I 1 IR:'111.i.tl?, f 1 Ati6.'STI.•. .. Z>'�I. , 2r R�IT`12 v Ltll p.�_�LI1 r�V1, : 1 Y7 I .111 • II�ilI I�I ft+ , I1.I 1I, a x Pa•'+'' , I / t;,! I I;11 I,eiili 31 Y.M 1 i �17['+I'i 4 4 II I i�.f III �Ii lli,•I it 1 r r r, I I 0 I I I 1 b. '■ 11•IHL111 II�II;II HI ICI,I' lit JI 1IIMI•II, 'IAfi6'�II lE PJhllil 1 t �,a 1 .. ..i. I;N 1«:..fit>I- 'c v l-3 4• 1 1;,t t#a•.1 lr.tl�y,rsx 411" ,eft .r.1�:11e1 is H,:4:1' '''''e. ,a.1.j: e r^+:..eta 1i'1i I P4vif`. .,v�r ',1 't 'I 1i;ll T-�C.:•`•-0 '. I I {�. is .111 .1 STUCCO 5a lT ND AL211UI i"2WL -- MAN EY1SAV:E ACCENT ENO VAME!CLEAR IW' LDNER9 TTP. • [BRAE OLdee i TILT COA RTELL• DEAAIED FAMEDPLAS.m. • WEST ELEVATION NORTH HALF /!-PAWED•4/0l ©u I i I PAINTED TET•u• SCALE:1A5'•M10' I—PdN1'.::1:4. COCREIE /I COGRETE G • Q MEAL A © l� L: iil, TI Y/ •VEAL Q O y �•iiM� %�%i1_: • i," 6 I �� 1 a1 —�— 3T4�1 a I 10•ti .. • 1111_IIIIMINI—MMINPM_=:.PFIR I • i I.. F 1.•T v (gg., .i.r.V.i:rli Atli 0 A+1 D1 1M:11 is a ti a! • h era_ ......,.....0-At,I h a a a ti� n<,:: - \ r 1 �, enrr.0 xnn<.e 1 1 , 14*1040 ETGDA SIUCCO 044.0 A•C ACCEV END----I `. —d.J1NICi40I MaA^E!CLEAR/Si ACCENT EMD V\ ._. RAY/ LASS • MOM 040186 LLT•1PCCIC.FE'W 1 ER?lS GLASS Ttl4<IED 11.1-UP COCFVE L NECAPE UR1 PI'A4A1ED NORTH ELEVATION LAAScAPE EEC, SOUTH ELEVATION c2.0.2 orau"°"— eCJ,LE•Ne'.R•p' PONIED gASNM '( WALLS 100%..10C1 E1 SCALE LE:OW.1. 4157S PANTED 1 LTAP CCNCREIE DIAY00 E6SEYCE O e� r 0l 0 ,� Q I / REAL- 1 y--$-I /tt i dfL4 ELDDEL.MYfSI i •AC32•N I 1 ' I , Ir7 1 1 —1 . 1I' 4 R11L1E:WV:NU r r. NN• . \ Mal DOOa CCCat-1 EAST ELEVATION NORTH HALF • PADDED PLASRW - �/ O � O V O 7—PAWED PLI-IP COCRE"E I� 0 0 ^ O 'itr c I I o > NI_ U tO o ' E i —: ? Ii 1 �,, a t r t r� • I..I I—I—Q� I I ar.E 04Ea•Ea I wt.AE 0V!-E.0 V `�TDIOPE°YEMC A 111N1 DOOR 11.01 DOOR 11LM:VCR EAST ELEVATION SOUTH HALF A-6 .....,NI'•"•E OE/1E/00 02:11 am CA CAD CIT AF RENTON LIE • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • • June 16, 2.000 Ledcor Properties Inc. 9655 SE 36th St., Suite 210 Mercer Island, WA 98040 SUBJECT: LIND AVE. & SW 30T ST. —PACIFIC GULF BUILDING Dear Barry: • I have reviewed your request and agree that the proposed telecommunications facility is similar in intensity to a warehouse with respect to parking demand. The Renton Parking Code does not address telecommunication uses, however based on the reported nature of telecommunication operations the demand for parking seems to closely match that of warehouse and storage buildings. Although telecommunication facilities are not identified in Renton's Parking Code, I recognize that such uses are unique with respect to parking needs. Telecommunication facilities seem to require a considerable amount of floor area to house the technical equipment, however only a minimal number of employees are needed to operate the facility. Based on the information provided to the City on the operation of the proposed telecommunications facility, it seems appropriate to apply the warehouse and storage building parking requirements of one parking space for every 1,500 square feet of gross floor area. Please be advised that future users of the building will be subject to a parking analysis prior to the issuance of a business license or the approval of a building permit. If based on the parking analysis it is determined that the parking does not meet the requirements of the code or if the parking is inadequate to serve any future user, then any permits or licenses will be denied. Document2lcor 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 • • If you have any questions regarding-this information please call me at (425) 430-7218. We look forward having your business in the City of Renton. Sincerely, • Jana Hanson Development Services Director cc: Laureen Nicolay Lesley Nishihira Document2\cor . - , ............... CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENTDIVISION ••....... pE . OWN E RS"":.0.0 N... . . 3 0 N-el-GU°frks • Gone_leArt(J-f gcvveitaitits PROJECT NAME: 131 , APPLICATION NO: 1-4_)14 - OO - • The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. • ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NAME ADDRESS NUMBER . . 564 41144 1 . - r • • • . • • , _ • , .;N.. 1 • f • 1. • (set r' (lc,. 470 00 , (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I,4 4 mo.ez j , hereby certify that the above.list(s) of property (Print Name) = . NE-4 owners and their addresses were obtained from: S,IUN 11 `SO .. - > _ ,� �� .V rig El City of Renton Technical Services Recorgs _`�l, lir:Title Company Records � �� King County Assessors Records ; • Signed ..•.!' </ Dateetff-te• j +•9, of WA�� ( pllcant) / t t NOTARY ATTESTED•)Subscribe1 and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at .0 on the day of ..JL{,1.--Y , 19 W. Signed 4 f Q b ' (Notary Public) ****For City of Renton Use*`*'` CERTIFICATION OF,MAILI hPRICYN KAMCHEFF • J �u K Y hereby certify that notices of the proposed TtAi.C. ' ' 7te to (City p Employee) CO2 0 0� COMMISSION EXPIRES each listed property owner on JUNE 29, 2003 • Signed Salm-- • SQL Date: 1012-46-0 NOTARY • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing on theac.&x day of 41 �), , ere) Signed A listprop,do a, REV 07/98 AP'POINTMENT EXPIRES: ,.._ ; 2 ,A _ iVi .. Scan/King(WA) Owner :G I Joes Inc Parcel# : 125360 0010 07 Site : 9300 SW 34Th St Renton Sale Date : 03/28/1996 Mail :9505 SW Boeckman Rd Wilsonville Or 97070 Sale Price : $1,375,000 Use : 932 Vacant,Industrial,1 To 5 Acres Asd.V : $1,375,400 Lgl : LOT 1 BURLINGTON NORTHERN-BSP Q : SW S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:4.51 YB: Ph: . Owner :Burlington Northern Railroa Parcel# : 125360 0020 05 Site : 3501 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/06/1992 Mail : 3501 E Valley Rd Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : • Use :253 Com,Retail Store,25K+Sqft Asd.V : $8,128,700 Lgl :LOT 2&POR 3 BURLINGTON NORTHERN Q : SW S : 30 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 134,762 Ac: 11.16 YB:1995 Ph: Owner :Eastgate Theatre Inc Parcel# : 125360 0030 03 Site : 3751 E Valley Rd Renton 98055 Sale Date :02/08/1996 Mail :7132 Commercial Park Dr Knoxville Tn 37918 Sale Price : $4,573,786 Full Use :347 Rec,Movies,Walk-In Asd.V : $9,787,500 Lgl :LOT POR 3 BURLINGTON NORTHERN BSP Q : SW S :30 T:23N ' R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 74,306 Ac: 12.28 , YB:1996 Ph: Owner : Powell-Orillia Llc Parcel# : 125360 0050 08 Site :9300 SW 41St St Renton Sale Date : 04/24/1997 Mail :737 Market St Kirkland Wa 98033 Sale Price . Use : 931 Vacant,Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V : $210,000 Lgl :LOT 6 BURLINGTON NORTHERN-BSP Q :NW S :31 T:23N R :05E Bedrm ; Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .80 YB: Ph:425-828-4444 • Owner :Little Deli Mart Inc Parcel# : 125370 0211 02 Site : 19253 84Th Ave S Kent 98032 Sale Date : 11/01/1996 Mail : 19253 84Th Ave S Kent Wa 98032 Sale Price . Use :242 Com,Retail Strip,10K To 25K Sqft Asd.V :$846,500 Lgl : BLK 3 LOT 8 BURLINGTON NORTHERN Q :NE S :01 T:22N R : 04E Bedrm : Bch F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 11,800 Ac: 1.18 YB:1987 Ph: Owner :Prudential Ins Co Of Americ Parcel# : 125380.0170 09 Site :4060 Lind Ave SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : 05/17/1985 Mail : 12835 Bel Red Rd#140 Bellevue Wa 98005 Sale Price :$161,568 Use : 506 Ind,Warehouse,100K+Sqft Asd.V :$4,354,800 Lgl :BLK 2 LOT 4-5 BURL N ORILLIA IND Q :NW S : 31 T:23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 133,922 Ac: 5.54 YB:1981 Ph: Owner :Arensberg Investments Parcel# : 125381 0010 02 Site : 3401 Lind Ave SW Renton 98055 Sale Date : 12/31/1984 Mail : 3401 Lind Ave SW Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price : $672,948 Use : 506 Ind,Warehouse,100K+Sqft Asd.V : $4,026,900 Lgl : BLK 5 LOT 1 BURLINGTON NOR IND PK Q : SW S : 30 T:23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: 1 BldgSF: 118,176 Ac: 5.14 YB:1986 Ph: Owner : Badford Property Investor Inc Parcel# : 125381 0020 00 Site : 500 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date :07/10/1997 Mail :270 Lafayette Cir Lafayette Ca 94549 Sale Price : $32,165,745 Full Use :264 Off,1-3 Story,50K+Sqft Asd.V : $22,800,000 Lgl : BLK 5 LOT 2-3 &7&BURLINGTON NOR Q : SW S : 30 T: 23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF: 59,224 Ac: 17.98 YB:1986 Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. r• M..,Zcan/King (WA) ' Owner :Badford Property Investor Inc Parcel# : 125381 0020 00 Site :500 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/10/1997 Mail :270 Lafayette Cir Lafayette Ca 94549 Sale Price : $32,165,745 Full Use :264 Off,1-3 Story,50K+Sqft Asd.V : $22,800,000 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 2-3 &7&BURLINGTON NOR Q : SW S :30 T:23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF: 59,224 Ac: 17.98 YB:1986 Ph: Owner :Badford Property Investor Inc Parcel# : 125381 0020 00 Site : 500 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/10/1997 Mail :270 Lafayette Cir Lafayette Ca 94549 Sale Price : $32,165,745 Full Use :264 Off,1-3 Story,50K+Sqft Asd.V : $22,800,000 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 2-3 &7&BURLINGTON NOR Q : SW S : 30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF: 59,224 Ac: 17.98 YB:1986 Ph: Owner :Badford Property Investor Inc Parcel# : 125381 0020 00 Site :500 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 07/10/1997 Mail :270 Lafayette Cir Lafayette Ca 94549 Sale Price : $32,165,745 Full Use :264 Off,1-3 Story,50K+Sqft Asd.V : $22,800,000 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 2-3 &7&BURLINGTON NOR Q : SW S : 30 T:23N R : 05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF: 95,800 Ac: 17.98 YB:1987 Ph: Owner :Puget Sound Blood Center Parcel# : 125381 0040 06 Site :501 SW 39Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date : 01/03/1997 Mail :921 Terry Ave Seattle Wa 98104 Sale Price : $2,000,000 Use :263 Off,1-3 Story,15K To 50K Sqft Asd.V : $1,212,700 Lgl :BLK 5 LOT 4 BURLINGTON NOR IND PK Q : SW S : 30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories:2 BldgSF:30,000 Ac: 1.92 YB:1986 Ph:206-292-6500 Owner : Victoria Park Parcel# : 302305 9001 02 Site : *No Site Address*Renton Sale Date . Mail :PO Box 1104 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price . Use :901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V : $930 Lgl : STR 302305 TAXLOT 1 POR NE 1/4- Q :NE S :30 T:23N R :05E Bedrm : Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .92 YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable,But Is Not Guaranteed. KC. 117 * • ,, yr.11.1,7=4,...,..=.1 ern v.It r.1 TN NORM 0.2.- • . .1.0 II NI La OAP V r71421t11Par •tt:r ev•,..1.r0. ENTIRE MAP S V‘ii 30-23- 5 KING COUN, ,0=-:-.r.:-...._ • ..atre MUSA,.ritidiirma. CITY OF RENTON s SCALE 1.•100. . DEU—OF ASSE SMENTS . X' -- ___\.— 4`•• '''.'`'m" NW3O23 11....•••.••••••; - -;• • . - ri•.. - .elo 4 li' • tn • _ it- • e;., ,...._ , if .4 ii 11 1----' .,.1.0. 4, ‘1k A" •....e:. e e• 1.se"TA 1 c 1. .,,,- 4, " ..•0...,. 2 . 0 7 0,245.4'140'e S 1! 1 ‘44'.• 6111 xxv_,...1. 4 to.. ...:,504 i .1:rx.....1..uh—.wl.rtsr, :K2 if ----'. e• 4... ...... 11 ''.... i 'I , . • , , : 4 4 1 TT:.-. e ..... , '1'1 de• CS v f. ; c;.,. ..• i E • / , , 1 3 I •It. : it t! :::-. - : tz. 1 4 1 ,a, •It 0 4. 1.. tar a I i 1 sr 1 d,Nla . ! .... ..-1 PA• :, •••.., . ..4 A 5 kV/ 4 t':;:. ;:' '1•7 ( e ..... , ‘C' 4'2 / if:. • fe• =, „ i T ...... i 2 i .. .. . ...... •• •••••.......-. ...../: , •... ,..8 .e ....2., ..,,,•r - 4 SW 34T11 ST ' . ----• I , * 24 SRN ST . I• Rs r• R.., 1 ' -..r....., .,.j .... 4.::::\ 1.1..* ...,....4::: ••-••• 8 le .4 i.,....../. 4 i ".- . .•4 t. """ ....;.N '..,... 1 0'li ill •-Itt' .02 t : 11 b . 1 . il i.r -5"' 1 , LOT a ii / f -,.. Core / Leta'1 ,: i 1 i i Os 'z ., _ i __i__ e , - .,-i". — 4? 4, 1.———7 ,:.•••,.• ••• 1 ../ .../.. 4 . 1 1 48 AA .i? . - •,.. ..• ., . /- et, ) tIEe ...4••:::. • ,...- . rt. .,.., .:t• ...• ;::: ^:••• .......: :Pe r.i'• I • ,..:....... 4r •;•-•5---- • (a_s• ,...f ..2f:fr c, ? 1 7 •`'' / ..... e ,: •. .• , e4. ie / ..? ------- ; -• c,; :: I '.. ....4, • .,:57 j 1 . al i't „ : • :i 1 1. .. . t 2 , e/ • 04.OP', ' .....,..... .4.% i . / ,.4%- . I t . V .....w./ •,., I_.... .41' II • LOOT .. .A......4.-k, ... .... ee;•;:o i: e----- .O O 4 ...P ....---.. 0 .4.z. ln 47, . . 1 3-•4_,, S 14 ..__ J..A,;:.1••,;:.•.:,•,':.. '''....-,.-...,s-..-'.•' . 7..4.4. ., .•. ,,-.,...—-,.:..... o.•.-..,-...,-,-..„, 1 • i _ ___ . T 13...err •=7.% I 1-.. --hr.-7::;.:' • . .-- .,•• . • • i --.., - • . .., I Jeaa • • . • ...**..i..."ps i • .- bi RN ST L411-14-1.1•-INTL r,,,,y,TO10211204 11 tf 2$ \%\ 10/ 4 LOT 1 l•q,1: i.T. 42 ,..,'.:\ •.... .""'.........--.....7.' 7 R ..,„li F o '.I, ....... r : • \ . ..'1' ...,:::: 1 k. .,••,. -..., i . . • , t. ; -_ ..... =.....P... '''' '‘2=--••••••" ...m.o.:, _ ...0..-,”r•YEMiiiI.: / . - 0. / NW 31.23-5 (-7,. `,.,. ,-,.... . . . . . . • . • . . nl KING COUNTY •:r B.R+. � � DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS sw s°•za-s )r‘,4 11113. ,,,_, .____Li.. — SCALE,I'-too' „—, { y..LOT] Ell r• PaaK •H��'o •�k€JJJz rP a�d� '. �. t i yA °Ry Ts.'°O r =F3 a�E.T. i• kIll& SW .IST sT ` q. ur,oi°,. .IST °T .e. car, + ti..� ,__,y •'r r i*l I ti \T "$ E 6 n . .11,/ * 33 yam a� f o 11: i pY tEa�aE�lON ' // • 5 0u5\ {�/fT ' r P r. i P+° J4, s 1: if _` f'., .r• n J.wn✓ _ ,s 1...,., as •� ._ - _� N~ i -----.-. a�.e. t_•, e ...,rnJ_,--,m... L...e1 n".iro sT _ -�mom_ _N «--+_fie"_!�.�=.•-'�"..� f ra ,_..,. ...r.' r. ..':..+✓ ^ ••j ^-I 1 r I 1 ,. �tr 9r f ..,� e.v.-a.j.. + Z Z ..........., _ /fir i 1,(�1•-•- L.1,1 -- ,I yl^ ra btr . .+• . rx ^ .:,;,.../..,,,.! �. I I, / t i e 1 l Oil 406 e .,s ✓. ,4c`;{ `� �` +J d.,Oa .e ,e,,, fir ©. • s P �r .....o.n✓ « fl '' /,' KENT °P es-le °TO°310040 • • J � 9 m ;®,rc 7 «M,r . I -":%--ter:': "'",-;" 1 0 ' i e rC it is L....._ SW 3I-23-3 .v.,-....•—_.....r_I.w..man a-,. %des • 125360 0010 07 125360 0020 05 125360 0030 003 G I Joes, Inc. Burlington Northern Railroad Eastgate Theatre Inc. 9300 SW Boeckman Road 3501 East Valley Road 7132 Commercial Park Drive Wilsonville, OR 07070 Renton, WA 98055 ,., Knoxville, TN 37918 125360 0050 08 125370 0211 02 - 1125380 0170 09 Powell-Orillia LLV i T Little Deli Mart, Inc. Prudential Ins. Co. of America 737 Market Street 1,31 19253 84th Avenue South 12835 Bel-Red Road #140 Kirkland, Washington 98033 Kent, WA 98032 Bellevue, WA 98005 125381 0010 02 125381 0010 02 125381 0020 00 Arensberg Investments Badford Property Investor, Inc. Badford Property Investor, Inc. 3401 Lind Avenue SW 270 Lafayette Circle 270 Lafayette Circle Renton,WA 98055 Lafayette, CA 94549 Lafayette, CA 94549 125381 0040 302305 9001 02 Puget Sound Blood Center Victoria Park 921 Terry Avenue P.O. Box 1104 Seattle, WA 98104 Renton,WA 98057 , • . _ _ _ . _ ,i + D+ rLCNr-c0� Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Lesley Nlshihira,Project Manager,Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 8,2000.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall,contact the Project NOTICE OF APPLICATION Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NONE decision on this project. SIGNIFICANCE(DNS) CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA(425)430-7270 • I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I DATE: . October 25,2000 I - LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF - APPLICATION NAME: 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review(SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the ' building within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons;therefore,SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan(File LUA-99-105) • has been previously approved. PROJECT LOCATION: 3600 Lind Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined ,^;1■■mif ■I V\ that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 4321 C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS Is likely to be Issued. I11. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are Integrated into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS).A 14-day appeal ■. 1 • period will follow the issuance of the DNS. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 13,2000 e r c III.i _ NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 25,2000 =7 .•rrf�: PermllslReview Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review i� �;9 ,/ Other Permits which may be required: Fire Department Tank Permits,Building Permits I _!J l�r1 / Os rrr 1 Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Report Mk! O -„ Location where application may — Iri'I. be reviewed: Planning03uil u Works Division,Development Services Department, �:�---,� ,�,�, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A �(� CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: kV- I l I �'^ Land Use: The subject site is located within the Employment Area-Valley(EAV) / `---' Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and the Medium Industrial(IM) Zoning designation.The proposed generators to be added to the approved -"'— officelwarehouse facility is consistent with both the EAV and IM land use ' ,designations. • Environmental Documents that i Evaluate the Proposed Project: NIA , Development Regulations ' Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Regulations,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code 1, and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The initial review of the proposal does not reveal the need for additional mitigation above and beyond existing code II provisions. -- - _ - __ — NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION — CERTIFICATION • • I, 4X4.&- \e.(r,fn. , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in "5 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . (pc* . 2a 200, • Signed: aZ, 6,,,r-,____ Ar1'EST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing in jj z,Jy ,on the I(o At. day of`77 i) . 'ZDe-r) �7')CUB- ,,,„„(/ ..�, ��. �.r a v_� + ,6 •-K--- NOTARY PUB D I STATE OF WASHINGTON MARILYN KAMCHEFF COI1RMIS8Idr I EXPIRES ' MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 „PAL 4_,, 203,, • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- • SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DATE: October 25,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-137,ECF APPLICATION NAME: 360 NETWORKS EMERGENCY GENERATORS PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting Environmental Review (SEPA)for the installation of up to 17 generators for use as backup power service to the building and tenants. Each generator includes a double wall 4,000-gallon diesel fuel tank with built-in overflow protection. The generators would be located on the West Side of the building within the truck bay loading areas. The accumulated total of the tanks associated with the generators exceeds 10,000 gallons; therefore, SEPA review is necessary. A minor modification to the approved site plan (File LUA-99-105) has been previously approved. PROJECT LOCATION: 3600 Lind Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE(DNS): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14-day appeal ��✓ period will follow the issuance of the DNS. �j\ PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: October 13,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 25,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review Other Permits which may be required: Fire Department Tank Permits,Building Permits Requested Studies: Geotechnical Report,Drainage Report Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: The subject site is located within the Employment Area—Valley(EAV) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation and the Medium Industrial(IM) Zoning designation. The proposed generators to be added to the approved office/warehouse facility is consistent with both the EAV and IM land use designations. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: N/A Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The project will be subject to the City's SEPA Ordinance,Zoning Code, Regulations,Public Works Standards,Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code and other applicable codes and regulations as appropriate. Proposed Mitigation Measures: The initial review of the proposal does not reveal the need for additional mitigation above and beyond existing code provisions. NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Lesley Nishihira, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on November 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: LESLEY NISHIHIRA (425)430-7270 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION 11111 ar FT i1701 AK 1Mr it 'Sy NEIGHBORHOOD DETAIL MAP .mn•m• NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATION CITY .:;;1F RENTON- :Planning/Building/Public Works Department. • ' - • Gregg Zimmerman P.E:,Administrator. Jesse Tanner,`Mayor, _ -. October 25, 2000: • • Mr.David Kehle 12720 Gateway Drive,Suite#116 '. Seattle,WA 98168 • SUBJECT: 360 Networks Emergency Generators Project No. LUA-Op-137,ECF: Dear Mr. Kehle; The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete.according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on November 14, 2000.; Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-7270, if you have any questions. ?" Sincerely, Lesley Nishihira . Project Manager cc: Pacific Gulf Properties/Owners • acceptance 1055 South Grady Way-;Renton,Washington 98055 . - T.ic nine.nrnt& Gnat eo....nln�me/n.iel.000/nr.c1 nnnc..mnr " %;S ...... �J . .....E iM `.... ..... ..... �` • • ` : ::::.:::.::.::::: e lNF , O::: : : :: ": :::::::;:>::;:::::: :»:< ::;:»>::»><» P: < .:. RT'Y>:O'IN'N.ER ::S'``�<;<><<`>< >>>`> >>>>_'�`<' ::<<:>:>:>:>:<�:i:>:»�<:»:P:ROJ ................. ..,..:..... ROPE.:..:..::.......................... .�...................................... .........:::::......................................:::::::::::::::::.::........................ ....................::::::.......::::::........... Note If there is n1ore"than one Ieoal.ovvner,piease attacl an additional: rlotarized<Mt;A estdpp(icationifor<eaoh:::o.Wners::a:::s::>:s?:::_>:s>::>::>::»>:::>::«:>::::>:>::»::>::::»:«:?:<:: PROJECT OR DrtzqEVE OPMEnNT N�A,ME: NAME: estCNCrElwl�xv>• 21L! .'.1$6 ill'C 6L1Hir FfP° arrtW PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: Z' o LIO AVE'.r ), 4tC) lfau I 41, t. . KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S A OUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: ZIP: I�� J -ft ,jL . d1Zr(,L '� I?*3tGo - ��W'©� 123co0 - co -®I TELEPHONE NUMBER: 1.-1 Z.Z, ••• ) EXISTING LAND USE(S): ��'�'<APP:R[.CANT'` .if"othex..�E� ....ouv.. ..�.......:....:..: :..:. 2 .............................................................................. TIOFgl �� PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: /, 4 EH up ea'wo� 4 'Alt COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: OW \\10,2� h11lat{M6IsI" f IZiiik!VbLuizr ADDRESS: 22CC) I 12,2„. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): �/,� CITY: %'- ,01-1T., I►}1. ZIP: QQ12 EXISTING ZONING: I R/ HErfuri I uPU9i t. 0- TELEPHONE NUMBER: tJM„, ° 1.047/(4e, L`''-Opp w`"'�� `�� F � � PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): /TY 4/4.,,p O .:::<>::::T P SO 4 N G SITE AR�EcA (SQ.' FT. .00RyACREAGE): / ,�v. freCp4,,9 NAME: VNV.►)eiVG 7.% 1k• Wes^,• Gk -, C 6 : 10is COMPANY (if applicable): . PROJECT VALUE: 412:b. lieskevrF 4170i fl , ADDRESS: IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? IZ12O Q -1 1lrIE I[LO NO CITY: ZIP: Gh i Cub. 1/LIE' IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY / Cub. �i SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: 140 • • .i:LvLi...iv.i:+L!.,v,:i:[.:LL!<:::i':J.•:', y`?::.isisi: i:::::i:"*::i?2i::::isi:::>:ji::::i:::>y:::ii�::i:::`ii:::i5:i::::::?Y.i':?'t isyC::j:j:j'::':>.:i`<i:'>?:;t.''::::::{:iif:::::{::::ii:::::::i::y:::::ii$i:j��::i. EC ..DES.CR. ...a�..P.ROPERTY:. Atta.ch..se .�Ira�e..sF�eet.>If..nacassar..... ............. .....:. .........:.t Z 6FD 3 6 Qs' [7471-41. LILA • 61 7' H�L • - bCCb *lc 91c[Inr r ' a21920 t 2 0Ng AIRY J&4l0116% Il.Lr; NUrklFUJ2 qb°%1Romiligitinmeiimmaii >: 1 r:> li. . i r�::;: C a Cat 0 5 � l...Ch. .. .....a.... :..::..:..:..:..:..:.:::..... .� ...t...at.a . .....G. .... t ....f........r.....:det .........e.��e 7.7 e. ........................:.................:.. _ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ _ REZONE $_ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ • SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ • _ EXEMPTION $No Charge 4NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $/OOD.09 REVISION $ I, (Print Name) ✓ V Ip I'5 F-1. , declare'that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application, -the authorized representative to act for the property owner (please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.. k5',^ ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and vV ` ' I ''J' , for the State of tOPK. residing w,:f ( ' Q' am f n r/Representative) on the `A"d y`of oia (Signature of Owner/Representative) • Q , �� I Q G' ( ignature of Not y Public) ......:.....:.::... ...........;:.;:.. ;:. . . ..:.. CItY 1=ile..Numher..; ,....f.. .. .:.. AAAb6SP..;;;CAP;:S:<.;::;CAP.;:.U;.:,;:GPA>;.:.CU:/�.;;>;::CU:..H ::: <:�.�:<:.:. • :. :> P... . >;::>' _ ::., V=H ..W MHP:.:'.FP.UD.::::FP>PP'.;R RVM SAASAH .:SHPLA SHPL_H:`:>< SP<;<':SM: SME'' ':Tl'::<::: V.=A:> 1i.=B..... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 8/97 PROJECT NARRATIVE FOR: 360networks Emergency Back-up Generators The proposed project addition to the 360network's project involves installation of up to 17 generators for use as a back-up power service to the building and tenants. 360networks provide web hosting, client hosting and facility areas for other companies to provide computer connections to multiple fiber optics communication lines and companies. It is extremely important to always have data and systems available for access even in the event of a power outage. Inside battery back up will provide immediate power but longer term outages will require the generator back up. Each generator consists of the generator, an "under belly" diesel fuel tank (double wall) of 4,000 gallon capacity with built-in overflow protection, all housed inside an acoustical steel enclosure which also provides secondary fuel containment. There will be a noise limiting muffler outside enclosure. The muffler will limit the noise from the exhaust system of the generator. There are air intake louvres in the enclosure for make-up air and cooling for the generator which will meet the city noise ordinance required levels. Since the generators are self contained, noise will be minimized via the acoustical enclosure and fuel spillage is limited to filling operations, which can be mopped up with absorbent pads. These Genset enclosures will be installed on concrete slabs in former truck well areas. The exterior slab is approximately 24" below the main building slab. The enclosures will be screened from the street view a series of steel louvres with horizontal steel supports which tie into the horizontal architectural elements of the building. The louvre screening will provide a uniform look at each of the former truck well areas, which will also provide additional architectural modulation and accent to the building. • The Environmental Review is required since the total accumulated aggregate amount of fuel stored on site exceeds the 10,000 fuel limit even though each individual tank does not exceed that threshold. Each tank is for 4,000 gallons of diesel but the total accumulated amount will be 68,000 gallons. The generators and fuel tanks will comply with city, state and Federal regulations as well as Fire Department and UL standards. The major control on impacts is that each Genset is a stand alone unit with only a 4,000 gallon fuel supply. This limits both risk and exposure. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING ,CITY OF RENTON OCT 1 3 2000 r31'. V�� - RECEIVED D E T E R S O N "`� '' 1 2CI,"3 CONSULTING ; 3 ENGINEERS • DAVID KEHLE,ARCHITECT October 9,2000 DEVELOPMENT PI.i^ CITY OF REN T ON David Kehle, Architect 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 116 OCT 1 3 'LSO , Seattle,WA 98168 Subject: 360 Networks (a.k.a.Pacific Gulf Properties) Renton,WA Dear Mr. Kehle: The forgoing discussion is in response to a recent request by the City of Renton for an addendum to the drainage report for the subject project. Evidently the future tenant for the project's commercial building will be placing back-up generators to maintain the electrical service to the building in the event of a power outage. The City has expressed concern regarding fuel spill control for the gensets. Based on our conversation today, I understand that there will be as many as 17 generators located along and adjacent to the west side of the future building. Each generator will be a self-contained unit housed inside a completely enclosed ventilated acoustical cabinet with a 4,000 gallon dual containment diesel belly tank. Each tank will be fitted with fuel overfill protection and the cabinet with secondary spill containment. With exception to occasional system start-up checks, the generators will only be operated during power outages. Therefore little fuel is expected be used at the site which substantially reduces the risk of a fuel spill. The City requested an addendum to the drainage report to address site spill containment. It should be noted that protection of an on-site and downstream drainage system in the event of a fuel spill is typically provided for sites with fuel transfer areas exposed to the weather. Since the dual compartment fuel storage tanks for the proposed gensets are completely enclosed units and protected as discussed above, no other spill containment measures should be necessary. The drainage report previously addressed water quality and quantity for the generator areas and analyzed the areas as impervious asphalt pavement. Therefore,no change to the developed hydrology is expected to occur by using the areas for generators. I am hopeful that the above discussion will sufficiently satisfy your needs. If you have any questions, please give me a call at(425) 827-5874. Sincerely, PETERSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS Keith A. Litchfield, P.E. CC: Bart Treece, P.E. Treece&Company 4030 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. NE, SUITE 200 • KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 • (425) 827-5874 (425).822-7216 FAX 1144 EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION 0021 WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS ::»::>:LA. D.US �:::::. F:;:>: U <::>;;:......... ..� ... .. .E.PERM T..S. .BMtTTAL'><>«::......... . Calculations, Survey, • • ens f Wor shee...4. ............:.:.::....... ..::::::.::::.:::::::. .::.:::::... :::::. :: Drainage Control Plan 2 a Elevations,Architectural a AND a Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 :Exj.�tiri' :<E�sements<`Ftecor�ed>C`o ........................ ........................... Flood Plain Map, if applicable 4 Fio r#Mans a�NQ Geotechnical Report 2 AND 3 • lif• ':. :>:: .n a:>t::<:><:1:: <:: <> : <> ;< > > < >: '> >> `')<>>< ::>, » >: ` <:« Grading Plan, Detailed 2 , ...... Landscaping Plan, Conceptual a t1A4U �rl/ j yy►��" a GD eS +- PM ; List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 ...... tGtil/(, ai ih eis:>fo;':,% ' < e , <` >> > <> ::' > '< :: 'i Ma lln Labe s for:Pro ert Own r a . : .. Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) •::>:<:> :> > < > > >» :::'>» ><>> � >:::>:><>>:.» Park.n .:LotGovera e.:&.:.....nd......... ►n9:...:n...[ .......: :::..:..::::::::.::::.::::::::::.: ..::..::::::::::::.::::::.:::: ::::::::::::::::::::::.:...::::..:::::::.:.....::::.. .:::::::::: Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 Preapplication Meeting Summary 4 P• ••it W k Approv::::.;.::::;:.:. 2 :.;::::.;::::.:.; .:::::..:..::.:. .:::.::::::. Rehabilitation Plan 4 O This requirement may be waived by: c�"pti 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: SLa 0 n€71-WcY14--S 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: G1 2.7/ 1 4. Development Planning Section //1 j ) h:\division.s\develop.sendev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 EVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION + ' WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS • • :>:>>:>;::>::>;::<::>:»:::`::>:':'«:>: Screening Detail 4 Street Prof Ifs> »<'' >' >< > > '<> '>` <z '<>'><> »<.''` `> ><< z<z«z: >>> > >> >> >s«''><'>>'<' '>< '> :> » » ''• Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 ;>::>:<: ;::::»> Traffic Study 2 Tree:.Cu..#In ....e .etafron.Cl�;aGln ..#�..an. ................................. : . . Urban Center Design Overlay District Report 4 • Wetlands Delineation Map 4 Wetlands Study 4 Cara/ `»< A '� i`anfi:A reemenf�Sta e ::>»:>:Tnveito>`''of>"Xis.#iri SI es. . ........................................ ....................................................................................................... ........................ .:.......:: >< :Ma ;:of:EXlstin9:�'..�;�..:.:..:.!.:.:.::. 2.�r,o.a::::::::::.::::..... ...::::::::::.:.....::..... ................. ............ .......:::::.::.:...:::.:::::::::::::..............................:::: ::..::. ..:.::.:::: This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: 31of2 f.2+V s 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: 4. Development Planning Section h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 . N" • IRO N •T- LiCH ECK LI • PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the • quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal., if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiting preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. E�C��^E FEt� ®N 1°G Dv OCI 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 360networks 2. Name of applicant: David Kehle, Architect(for Pacific Gulf). 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: David Kehle David Kehle, Architect 12720 Gateway Drive Suite 116 Seattle, Washington 98168 206-433-8997 4. Date Checklist prepared: October 3, 2000. 5. Agency requesting checklist: Planning/City of Renton. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction commencing November 2000 with completion scheduled for April 2001. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No, 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Site reconnaissance by B-Twelve and Associates a copy of the report was attached to Environmental Checklist prepared July 14, 1999 for Pacific Gulf warehouse. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, ' explain. Building Permit for 360networks. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton- SEPA for generators. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including proposed uses and the size of the project and site. To install approximately 17 generators, each having a 4,000 gallon diesel fuel tank meeting UL and Fire Department requirements. The generators are approximately 8'x 30'x 12'tall with acoustical housing and double wall, self-contained tanks. The generators will be located within truck well areas and behind screening louvers. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 3600 Lind Avenue S.W. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (underline one) Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountains. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Maximum 5%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. A soils report was provided as an attachment to earlier checklist. Soils consist of sands and gravels. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill, No fill is required. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Grading is covered under previous building permit and no additional grading Is required. 2 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (e.g. asphalt and buildings)? Approximately 65% coverage (under previous permit) Total Site Area: 321,987 SF Building Area: 98,752 SF(footprint) Paving Area: 111,523 SF • No Change due to generators. h. Proposed measure to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. The diesel generator will be tested periodically and exhaust from the muffler system will occur. (No additional emissions will result during construction from original project). b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the air, if any: The diesel generators are fitted with a factory exhaust/muffler system to limit exhaust pollutants to that of a typical diesel truck. Testing will be limited to only that amount necessary to ensure correct operation (once per week maximum), and the timing of the test is only 15 minutes. The testing will be staggered so that all generators will not be tested at the same time. 3. WATER a. Surface Water. 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, or wetlands?) If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 3 Yes, wetlands/detention areas and their buffers, constructed with the Act Ill and HomeBase projects, exist in the easterly 70'of this site. Generators are located on other side of site from wetlands. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material, if from the site. Does not apply. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The proposed project will not require the withdrawal of surface water. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, b. Ground Water: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals: toxic or nontoxic; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of each systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or • humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. 4 • c. Water Runoff(including storm water) 1. Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water is covered under previous permit. No additional runoff will be generated. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Surface water could be contaminated by runoff containing oil or gas from parked cars on the parking lot and streets servicing the proposal. However, surface water runoff will be directed into on- site water quality facilities. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Spill pads at filling area and automatic shut-off overflow protection will be incorporated into the generators. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Not applicable—see previous permit. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: All new landscaping and irrigation systems would be installed per the requirements of the City of Renton landscaping ordinance under previous permit. 5 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals, which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near site. birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows &seagulls mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None proposed. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating or manufacturing, etc. The generators are for stand by emergency power should the electrical sources be interrupted. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The generators are designed as fuel efficient as possible with no other measures required. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None to our knowledge. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire, Police and Ambulance services consistent with similar uses. No special services are required. 6 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental hazards, if any: None required. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from SR 167 and local arterial(s) can be heard from the site, but would not affect proposal. Background noise levels are typical of an industrial area. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short time or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The generators will be tested once a week for 15 minutes to maintain their effectiveness, Since these will only operate in the event of a power failure, the time of noise will be very limited and infrequent. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Mufflers on construction equipment during the construction period. Generator mufflers will be installed and limited operation time during (7am— 3pm) and the muffler will limit noise to meet the city noise limits which will mitigate any noise impacts. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant. Adjacent is a HomeBase Warehouse store, Act 111 Theater and U.S. Rentals facility;surrounding sites are commercial and offices uses. A permit is ready for construction of the warehouse building. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? !M 7 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area— Valley. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? -• - The generators will not add workers. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The generators will be screened from view via a series of metal louvers and metal panels, being used as accents to the existing building design. 9. HOUSING • a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The existing exterior building height is 36'above finished floor and the generators are only 14'overall height. The louvre screening will 8 be approximately 16'above finished floor. The design will have horizontal framing to align with the building modulation and provide a unity of horizontal banding. The main building will provide a backdrop to the screening and will still provide modulation. The louvre and structure will be metal, painted in keeping with the building color system (base building colors with accent horizontal banding). b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No change since basic building exceeds the height of screen walls. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: - - With the horizontal banding aligning with the main building and keeping the screening height to mask all of the generators, the building design and aesthetics will not change. The material differences at the screening wall will actually add to the modulation and break-up of the building. • 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No changes will occur from the proposal. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No safety hazards from lighting would occur. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None to our knowledge. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Act►Il Theatre Complex on nearby site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 9 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: This generator proposal has no impact on streets. This proposed project is located on a site that fronts Lind Avenue 510_+feet south of SW 34th Street. The East Valley Freeway(SR 167)parallels East Valley Road two blocks to the east. The closest freeway interchange is located at SW 41st Street where freeway southbound on-and-off ramps are available. Northbound on-and-off ramps for SR 167 are located at SW 43ro Street b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Transit routes 153, 163 and 247 on Lind Avenue are accessed at the existing stop on the site frontage. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The generators will not eliminate any parking. 234 +stalls-none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Frontage improvements are being done via general project e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air. transportation? If so, generally describe. No. 10 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No trips will be generated by the generators. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Since the generators do not have any impact on transportation and the general building project has identified its transportation impacts, no other measures are needed. • 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The generators will not increase needs for public services other than the Fire Department. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. If any. The generators are exterior to the main building and the fuel cells for the generators are double walled self-contained individual to each generator having 4, 000 gallons of diesel each. A fire extinguisher is within each generator area with appropriate spill control at the fueling port. No other major measures are necessary. 16. UTILITIES a. Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No utilities are required to run the generators. 11 C. SIGNATURE • I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full.disclosure on my part. Signature: Z Name Printed: rPAUc- Date Submitted: b-t2-0--c). 12 • • a Vilyee6tur . . • _:.:.:. ,,:.: . z.\,:; TERRA ASSOCIATES; Inc . <� .,b .a„ Consultants in Geotechnicaf Engineering, Geology »wx' and Environmental Earth Sciences • • • • ' June 9, 1999 . Project No.T=3707-2 • • Mr.Curtis Miller . • Pacific Gulf Properties, Ind. . • - 4220 Von Karman, Second Floor • : • • Newport Beach, California 92660-2002 Subject: Geotechnical Study .. • • • . Lind Avenue Warehouse Building • • 3600 Block of Lind Avenue • Renton, Washington Reference:. Geotechnical Report, Commercial Laundry Facility,:prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., dated August 15, 1997. • Dear Mr:Miller: •: As requested, Terra Associates, Inc. has completed a geotechnical study of the subject site: The site is located between the 3600 and 3900 blocks of Lind Avenue in.Renton, Washington. A Vicinity Map showing the • location of the site is presented as Figure 1. _ - . PURPOSE AND SCOPE - We previously completed a geotechnical study for the planned construction of a building in the northern portion of the site. Our findings and recommendations are summarized in the referenced geotechnical report. The purpose of this study was to obtain additional subsurface information and provide geotechnical recommendations • specific to the design and construction of the currently planned warehouse building. . • Our scope of work for this project included conducting four electric cone penetration tests (CPTs) at the site and preparing this report. The CPTs obtained detailed soil resistance and pore pressure profiles of the soils encountered beneath the site. - . Using the CPT and previous test boring data, we performed analyses to develop geotechnical recommendatio' for project design and construction. DEVEL OFMtr NT PLANNING i''I!71-:REN T ON OCT 1 3 2000 • 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 Phone (425) 821-77.77 0 Fax (425) 821-4334 0 terra@terra-associates.com • 'Mr. Curtis Miller June9,-1999. . • / • • • • , . . • . Specifically, this report addresses surface and subsurface conditions, Contains.the results of our analyses, and provides geotechnical recommendations for the following: • ' • . • • Site preparation and grading • • Foundation alternatives • • Settlement and liquefaction ' • Slab-on-grade floors • . • Lateral earth pressure • " • Utilities •. Pavements . .: . • • Drainage . • • • PROJECT DESCRIPTION _ . :Pacific Gulf Properties provided us with a'conceptual site plan(Scheme 9A) dated April 20, 1999.. Review of the site plan indicated that the subject project will.consist of constructing a.warehouse building encompassing 100,500 square feet Loading dock and parking areas will be located along the western and eastern margins.of the building. The building floor slab will be constructed at an elevation two feet higher than adjacent parking lot grades. We anticipate that site grades will be raised approximately two feet for parking lot construction. The buildings will be constructed using 24-foot concrete tilt-up wall panels. Perimeter wall loads could approach 4 to 6 kips per foot with interior columns carrying 80 to 100 kips. We,expect that floors constructed at dock-high , grade could impose loads of 250 to 300 pounds per square foot (psf). Access drive and loading dock areas will likely receive relatively heavy truck traffic loads. " • The recommendations contained in the following sections of this report are based on our understanding of current design concepts. We 'should review project drawings to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted, and be given the opportunity to develop supplemental recommendations if required. SITE CONDITIONS Surface We conducted a surface reconnaissance at the site.on May 27, 1999. The site is located between the 3600 and 3900 blocks of Lind Avenue in Renton, Washington. The site is bordered to the north by an equipment rental facility and to the west by Lind Avenue. A warehouse facility borders the site to the south. A theater complex and home supply store border the site to the east. Paved access roads extend from Lind Avenue eastward along the northern and southern site margins. A railroad spur lies adjacent to the northern property line. • Project No.T-3707-2 •• Page No. 2 . Mr. Curtis Miller . . . The flat site is currently open and cleared of primary:vegetation: The-northern portion of the site.consists.of a dirt surface. . Fill has previously been placed over a small area in the northern part of the:Site:. .Fill thickness . ranges to'a maximum of two feet. The northern part of the central area:containeda pile of stumps and debris. No standing water was noted in the site at the time of our visit: Site.vegetation consisted mainly of wild grasses. Assorted shrubs .were-present along the' western property line adjacent to Lind Av sm all, Shrubs and sall deciduous trees were also located in designated wetland areas in the'site's eastern margin. • Subsurface On_May 19; 1999,.'our exploration subcontractor;.Northwest Cone Exploration, performed four Electric Piezo- - - Cone Penetration Tests.in:the proposed building location. The tests were performed to:depths ranging:from 30.0 to 31.5.feet below existing site grades. . The approximate locations of•the CPTs are shown on the.Exploration Location Plan, Figure 2.'..:Plots.of the cone. data are*attached as Figures 3 through 6. Soil logs interpreted from the coriedata, along with;estimated Standard Penetration Test values (N60), .are attached as Figures 7 through. 10.. Boring .logs,from our .previous field . exploration at the site are contained in Figures l 1through 13; : ' : •• ' •. . The CPT-1.location was pre-drilled through dense fill soils to a depth of six feet:in order to facilitate pushing of the cone through the upper, relatively dense layer. The:cone and test boring data reveals that fill consisting of loose to dense sand and silty sand underlies the site to depths ranging from 4.5 to 7,5 feet A 2.5_-to 5.0-foot thick layer of very soft to soft clay and organic clayey silt was encountered beneath the fill in the CPT and boring. - •locations.. • : • -. The soft clay and organic.silt are underlain.by sand to .silty sand to the entire depth of the borings and cone. penetration.tests. -SPT and cone resistance values ..indicate the sands are generally medium dense, and become dense with depth: . _ - . Pore pressure measurements during cone testing indicate.that groundwater is present at a depth of about nine feet below the existing site grades. The test borings showed groundwater'at depths of 2.5 to 6.5:feet. -The Geologic.Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington, by D.R. Mullineaux(1965), shows-that the soils are'mapped.as peat (Qlp). ,The native clay and sands underlying the fill at the site correlate better with. the description of the nearby mapped.alluvium(Qaw).. : : ' GEOLOGIC HAZARDS • . • Seismic - The. Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3, as classified by the 1997 Uniform Building 'Code (UBC)• Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology, Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC indicates that a.Soil profile type of SD should be used in structural design. S ' • Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 3.. • 1�Ir. Curtis Miller June 9, 1999 We reviewed the results of our field investigation,and assessed the potential for liquefaction of the site's soil$. during an earthquake. We conducted.a liquefaction analysis.as part of our.previous study at the site using methods outlined in Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, by Seed.and Idriss (1982): Our previous analysis indicated that an approximately five-foot thick layer of medium dense silty sand,:observed in Test Boring B-2 at a depth of 12 feet,would probably liquefy under *Severe earthquake ground motions and moderate ground shaking of significant duration. - • • The cone penetration.tests encountered soil layers that have an equal or smaller potential for soil liquefaction than those shown in Boring B-2. Accordingly, our previous liquefaction analysis remains valid for.this project's larger site area. As noted in the referenced report, we do not believe building foundations would be subject to a • - bearing capacity failure resulting from soil liquefaction at the site. However; building settlements of up to one -and one-half inches may result upon dissipation of excess pore pressures generated during a seismic event. Erosion The soils encountered at the site consist of Snohomish silt loam (So) as shown on the Soil:.Conservation Service • .(SCS) maps of the area. Due to the flat nature of the site,these soils will have a low potential for erosion when exposed. . • DISCUSSION AND RECOM NDATIONS • . „ From a geotechnical perspective, it is feasible to construct.the warehouse building on the,site, provided the • • recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the project design and construction. • The primary geotechnical •design concern at the site is the presence of a 2.5- to 5.0-foot thick layer..of compressible soft clay and organic silt. Analysis indicates that, if unmitigated, compression of this layer under the.proposed fill. and building loads will result in unacceptable- levels of building settlements.. It will be necessary to induce the settlements prior to construction to mitigate potential settlement-related impacts to the structure. This may be*accomplished by surcharging the site with a fill pad placed at least three feet higher than the final building-pad elevation.. In our opinion, with the implementation of a surcharge program; the building may utilize conventional spread footing foundations and slab-on-grade floors constructed on the existing medium dense to dense fills. As discussed above, ground settlements ranging up to one and one-half inches Could result from shakingduring a severe earthquake. If spread footings are utilized, the owner Must be willing to accept the risk of liquefaction- related settlements occurring at the site and the potential impacts to on-site structures resulting from those settlements. Because the expected settlements due to liquefaction are relatively small, we anticipate that - settlement-related impacts to the building constructed with tilt-up panel$would include relatively minor cracking in walls and foundations. If the owner is unwilling to accept the risk of the liquefaction-related settlements, the building foundations and floor slabs should be supported on augercast piles. • Project NQ.T-3707-2 'Page No.4 • • Mr. Curtis Miller . , . 134 June 9,1999 : . „; . The following sections..provide. detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other.geotechnical il 11 design considerations: •These recommendations should:be incorporated into the final design. drawings and construction specifications. We should review'the final plans •so that we• can modify, or:provide additional * ` f: recommendations as required. 4: Site Preparation and Grading i. Following`clearing, the fill surface should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment prior to placement l' of additional fill. . Soft yielding areas should be overexcavatedto firm bearing'.soil and replaced with structural i fill. Where excavations to achieve firm conditions are excessive, use of a geotextile fabric such as Mirafi 500X in conjunction with limited overexcavation and replacement with a structural fill may be considered. Typically, it 18 inches of clean granular structural fill over the fabric will achieve a stable subgrade. .: • l _Our previous laboratory test results showed that the'existing fill was a few percentage points above its optimum moisture content at the time of our investigation, and that some of the.,fill contained up to 13 percent:fines:. These soils may difficult to compact if the moisture conditions cannot be carefully controlled. Care should be • taken to ensure.that exposed surfaces*of the on-site•fill do not become disturbed construction traffic'during wet weather conditions. : `. . Because of their moisture sensitivity, the ability to use these.soils as structural fill will depend on their moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. It will be difficult to achieve proper compaction of these soils when their moisture content is above optimum.•When the moisture is.excessive, the soil can be dried by aeration in order to-reach a moisture content that.will allow for proper compaction. :When properly.,moisture .conditioned, :it is our opinion that the-existing fills can be used:for fill below footings, 'pavements,and building floor slabs. • We recommend that imported structural fill required to achieve site .grades consist of inorganic granular soil meeting the following grading requirements: • • • . Maximum.Aggregate Size • 3 inches Maximum passing the No.4 Sieve • , 75 percent . • ' Maximum Passing the No:200 Sieve 25 percent (Based on the Minus 3/4-inch Fraction) (see following narrative). If fill placement takes place during wet weather or if the moisture conditions of the fill material cannot be controlled, we recommend importing fill soil that conforms with the above gradation, but with the maximum amount passing the No. 200 sieve reduced to five percent. • Project No.T-3707-2 • Page No. 5 Mr:Curtis Miller . - June 9, 1999 : • Structural fill materials should be placed in uniform'loose layers'not exceeding 12 inches-and compacted to a ) ti minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D-698 1- (Standard Proctor). The moisture content.of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of • b; its optimum, as determined by this ASTM method. -- �. � • i Prior to constructing foundations and floor slabs, we recommend that a Terra Associates representative be on-site to probe or observe proofrolling of the-subgrade to determine if,any isolated soft or yielding areas are present. Soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated and filled to grade with structural fill.or crushed rock. Surcharge and Settlements :. . As discussed, for spread footing foundation support and•slab-on-grade construction; we recommend placing:a surcharge fill pad over the building area. We do not believe it is necessary to place a surcharge.of fill within the- parking and access easement areas. However, we.recommend that the structural fill required.in the pavement areas be placed as soon as possible to allow time for consolidation of the compressible layers and reduction of "potential settlement impacts on pavement and utilities. -. • • - The site grades should be raised with structural fill placed and compacted as outlined in the Site Preparation and Grading section.- Once final building grade is achieved,:an additional.three feet:of fill should be.placed as a surcharge-. This surcharge fill does not need to meet any special requirements other than having a minimum in- • place unit weight of 120 pounds per cubic foot(pcf).: However;it is advisable to use a good quality fill to raise -grades in other portions.of the site,such:as parking and driveway areas, if necessary. We recommend extending the surcharge pad a minimum of five feet beyond..the building perimeter,"and then it should slope down at an inclination of 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical).`. - .. The estimated total primary settlements under the recommended surcharge range from four to.ten inches across- the building area. .These settlements are expected to occur 8 to 12 weeks following full application of the surcharge loading. The actual period for completion and magnitude of the primary settlements will be governed by variations in subsurface conditions at the site. • • - . The rate of consolidation can be accelerated by installing sand or wick drains at regularly spaced.intervals throughout the pre-load fill pad. Altematively;an additional thicicness of fill surcharge will accelerate the rate of primary settlement. Terra Associates,Inc. can provide specific recommendations for either option if acceleration - - of the surcharge settlement period is desired. . - - - To verify the amount of settlement and the rate •of movement, the surcharge program should be monitored by installing settlement-markers. A typical settlement marker installation is shown on Figure 14. The settlement markers should be installed on the existing grade prior to placing any building or surcharge fills. Once installed, baseline elevations should be obtained with subsequent readings of both the fill height and marker obtained every two days until the full height of the surcharge is in place. Once fully surcharged, readings should continue weekly until the anticipated settlements have occurred. • • • Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 6 Mr. Curtis Miller June 9• , 1999 i • . • It is critical that the grading contractor' recognizes the importance,of the settlement marker installations. :All ' efforts must be made to protect the markers from damage during fill placement. It is difficult, if not impossible, 1 to evaluate the progress of the surcharge program if.the markers are damaged or destroyed by construction 3 equipment::.As a result, it may be necessary to install new markers and to extend the surcharging time to ensure that settlements have ceased and building,construction can begin. Building foundations may be'.constructed at final elevations upon completion of the surcharge program: The geotechnical engineer •should review .the settlement monitoring data to verify that primary.'settlements. are i completed prior to foundation construction.. We estimate that post-construction settlements under.building loads will range to a total of one inch, of which three-fourth inch will be differential in nature.' The majority.of these: settlements-will occur as the building:.loads are applied during construction. These settlements.will occur independently of the potential:liquefaction settlements previously discussed: Foundations The building may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations bearing on structural fill placed and compacted as•recommended in the Site. Grading and Preparation.section. We recommend that a minimum thickness of four feet of existing compacted fill or structural fill be-present below. the footing construction. • Perimeter foundations .exposed:to the weather should be at'a minimum depth of 1.5 feet below final.exterior • •grades. .. ' .. We recommend designing foundations for a net allowable bearing.capacity of 3,000 psf. For short-term loads, such as wind and seismic,-a one-third increase in this allowable capacity:can be used in structural design: For designing the structure's foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.4'can be used. ' Passive earth pressures acting on the side of the footing and buried portion of the foundation stern wall should also be considered for resisting lateral loads.' ' We recorninend :calc;ulating-this' lateral resistance using an , equivalent fluid weight of350:pcf. At perimeter locations,we.recommend not including the upper 12 inches Of . soil in this computation because they can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity. This • value assumes the foundation will be constructed neat against competent fill soil or backfilled with structural fill as described in the Site Preparation and Grading•section. The recommended lateral resistance value includes a • safety factor.of 1.5: Slab-on-Grade Floors.: • With site preparation completed as described in the Site.Preparation and Grading section,new structural fill soils should be suitable for supporting slab-on-grade construction. With the anticipated floor loads, We estimate that floor slab settlement due to imposed static loads •will range from one-fourth to one-half inch. •The floor movements should be entirely differential with respect to the foundation construction. For slab thickness design with respect to floor deflection due to point loadings, a subgrade modulus of 300 pounds per cubic inch(pci)may be used. • Project No.T-3707-2 • Page.No.7 II Mr: Curtis Miller June 9, 1999. . ` • • We recommend placing a capillary break layer.immediately below the floorslabs. .The capillary break layer a should consist of.four-inches of clean, free-draining sand or gravel.which has less than three percent by weight of material passing the No. 200 sieve. This layer will guard against wetting of the floor slab due to the underlying soil conditions. Where moisture via vapor transmission is not desired, a polyethylene vapor bamer should be placed on the capillary break layer.•To aid in uniform curing of the•concrete, we recommend placing two inches , of clean uniform sand on the vapor bamer.. - • . . 3 •Lateral Earth Pressures The magnitude of earth pressure development.on cantilevered (unrestrained) 'or restrained retaining walls will partly depend on the quality .of the wall backfill We'recommend_placing and compacting wall backfill as structural fill. Below improved areas, such as pavements or floor slabs, the backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent:of its.maximum dry unit.weight, as.determined by•ASTM Test Designation D-698 (Standard Proctor): In unimproved areas;the relative compaction can be reduced to 90 percent...To guard against hydrostatic pressure development,,wall drainage should also be installed..: A wall drainage detail, showing drainage installation is given on Figure 15: .: • • With wall backfill placed and compacted'as recommended and drainage properly installed, we suggest designing • unrestrained walls;for an active earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 35 pcf f• or horizontal backfill. An at-rest earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 50 pef may be used in design of restrained walls. The above . earth pressure values assume that no other surcharge loading, such:as traffic, adjacent buildings, or soil back slopes, will act on:the wall. If such'conditions will exist, the imposed loading should be included in"the wall design.: - Friction at the base of wall foundations and passive:earth pressure will provide resistance to lateral loads: These values are contained in.the Foundations section of this report. : . Drainage : •. _ . Surface. . Surface gradients.should be created to direct runoff away from the building, and should drain towards suitable discharge facilities: With the exception of paved areas adjacent to the structure, we recommend providing a gradient of at least three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeters. :In paved areas adjacent to the building;a minimum gradient'of one percent should be provided, unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure. Subsurface ' • We recommend installing a continuous subsurface drain along the outside lower edge of the perimeter building foundations where landscaped areas are located adjacent to the structure. In our opinion, perimeter footing drains will not be required where paved areas extend to the edge of the building, or if floor slab elevations are higher than the adjacent outside grades. Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 8 Mr:Curtis Miller.: ' • ' . i •June 9,1999 • • ; The foundation drains and roof"downspouts should be tightlined separately to..an approved discharge"facility, 1 Subsurface• drains must be laid.with a gradient sufficient to:promote positive flow to.a :controlled point of" . • j approved discharge. Utilities . - } Where utility lines are to be excavated and installed in the paved areas, we recommend,placing all bedding and backfill in accordance With'APWA.and all applicable local and.state specifications: As a".minimum, backfill placement and compaction should betin accordance with the recommendations given"in the Site"Preparation and: Grading section of this report. •Where utilities Will occur below unimproved areas, the degree of: compaction can be reduced to a minimum.of 90 percent of the soil's maximum density as determined by the referenced ASTM standard Because-of the potential for long-term•settlements, utility pipe. inch of differential movement. • • Pavements • Suitable support for pavement construction will be provided by:subgrade soils prepared as described in.the Site Preparation and"Grading"section. Regardless of the obtained compaction results, subgrades must'be in a stable; •non-yielding condition:prior to paving. Immediately. prior.•to'paving, the. area of the :subgrade should be -proofrolled with heavy construction equipmentto verify this condition. : The required pavement thickmess is not only dependent upon the supporting capability of:t•he,subgrade soils;but also on the traffic loading conditions.that will be:applied. For light commercial vehicles and typical.passenger vehicle.traffic,the following pavement sections.are recommended: • " .Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over six inches of crushed•rock base (CRB) : • • : " • Two inches"of AC-over four inches of asphalt treated base (ATE) • • • • For heavy truck traffic areas,we recommend the following pavement sections:: :. - . • • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB - • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB " • • If there is a potential for pavement construction to be delayed until the wet winter months, the subgrade soils must consist of•a clean granular material (wet weather fill) as described in the Site:Preparation and Grading section. In addition, we strongly suggest that the subgrade be further protected by:placing"a layer of.ATB; on which construction traffic could access the project without excessively 'disturbing the subgrade soils. ,The ATB thickness should be four inches for this purpose. Repair of failed ATB areas should be anticipated prior to final paving. However, the overall integrity of the subgrade soils will be considerably less impacted if this protection is provided. • " - Project No.T-3707-2 Page No. 9 • Mr. Curtis Miller _ . June 9,.1999 • Over time, some longitudinal and transverse cracking of the pavement should be expected. Cracks in the• pavement should be sealed in a timely fashion to prevent excessive surface water infiltration into the subgrade ' soils and degrading their supporting capabilities. . • • • • ADDITIONAL SERVICES • ' • Terra Associates, Inc., should review the final design drawings and specifications in order to verify that our 'earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project"design and 'construction. We should also provide geotechnical services. during construction, in .order to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations.. This will also allow for design - changes if subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. • LIMITATIONS. • We prepared this report in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is. the.property of Terra Associates, Inc. and is intended for specific application to the Lind"Avenue Warehouse Building project in Renton, Washington. This report is for the exclusive use of Pacific Gulf Properties,Inc. and .. their authorized representatives: No other warranty; expressed or implied, is made. . The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data, obtained from the test borings • • drilled on-site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become evident' • until construction. If variations appear evident,:Terra Associates, Inc: should be requested to re-evaluate the recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. We appreciate the opportunity to provide geotechnical services to you on this project. We trust the information presented is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information,please • call. - -..,,1P. • RO f w.As -4 • • , . Sincerely a .0 - ,y ` TERRA •. e• !. IN • Kevin P.Ra• Project Engi Inn - —I 0 . . _______ i . . • • . • . . Theodore J. Schepper,P.E. . Principal Engineer • • . • Encl: Figure 1 -Vicinity Map Figure 2 -Exploration Location Plan • Figures 3 through 6—Cone Penetration Test Logs Figures 7 through 10—CPT Soil Logs Figures 11 through 13 —Test Boring Logs Figure 14—Typical Settlement Marker Detail Figure 15 —Retaining Wall Drainage Detail Project No: T-3707-2 • "Page No. 10 ... : �; ; I - . 5 rim"vfcuce / Y� PARI(. � I q ••DfXf 1-7 F;\ I 1 iI. } SW DY Wy uxrEx / sJ A.r £d L r " '' . I "I 1• 'rt G� ■ S NTOX ViLUGE PI.. • .1. _,_,.; INTO N i ,'®®►';i[7L10.1Y ;/ . . • • 1s15r n \ i • \ 'p, \. oyK{I(( ...:. .. •< _ -------fib _ vitt '- _.r_,, :G, `g„ I Y .20 • • 3j......: a5�w• SW I a.iiiiiiii.�. +r. h • ' ` sT S sT wss7.. _ I C-.4 G I8" S r,A sr 'j •r, s :. ylr X- ce 'I r. G �c�1 �,� ST. r • ■{:� 'I i `'0?.�lt • r'L'e rRy�b�I 3 I m. ` $1BTH•fi 'a f� I J j� !s r' yq - {p =s•L 19TX sr •�19 ,n p�ST •:�✓•,s i \90 . p l `"I S ,S t - ST �AL'dr o �� . \ '1Li Ly,I II,eu'1„U S t°r R70MHfLC P $ �i lRn Pt I. • �n .. I,R < 'RAAc • n PUG•ET x�+' 4 • '1 , WY .". r, �' �. aEn: I> sv� i'",sr P nua'W t>�(s .'M C 1 ,.•Eru,msa Ic yj !:' �+Imo' I : • 1. SW ' S a S ST) 1r �- 20R0 ST' r/ I r�(.:,r,:;•� • • = _ y H10 1 YYY B(Vo �m `.I .::• :: • : 8 LI ::rusr � zft. g . .'a,m L. .. _..r- k a.,•-.cS:L__i.1�:; IS', ._..•J, GIti. a' S "> 8I c gnirl - '`[ yl L % s' 4� T :• 16 0 \ a I «' 6c a j .•''r9 nw s�yArT \^mac 1 SE �I BUD � �s. • NTO N ,.,..,..;.,„,,,,s...,.' 27Tx .:VV •fM.3,r,i,•,,•� C n S . .I$ .2TTX ST N!109t t Y y �s\-.`" :10 1 s z1TS sr: �I:. I" \ J`� • w •' '.: 1..17:1 s 'P'' te!rTCX \ �R£1ROH_1„":'11.17DS \' '\ i T6TX �s 0 N -, !.�:. :1 ,� " ;..u; :,.: ,.•... 29TH ST AC• lt- -''."n:,.., '.� '9 �:. �TMR I "- $ • ..IL' I e _ 5W: :3oiii \© '31ST-n ^1 a 4!<. z,•29� . . ,.' ES r i ti YETLMtDs. S!TE .S*uo 'o v 1'a $ .I i x sE . • I 54��rr-"+• MrL \ _i i. <.sE a•l70•. RAT = irr— !' Y. I �i'' w '_- s ' • ' \ I v:. .. _ __ • RATE I. m 1 ' 7aTH ST s '\ !-1.r.012�0 .sumLr1f& 45 J2 •S7y. 1 - .• 7[ 7�Sis 5L`7rx=T\ IS 3yr 1= W��qAe• �''fff,. f 17 Ty SfsI IL I 6 :wry C'Q�;• '' . R I f. .. _ 1 •t I ��Ilg1 ,L,pr t4LL • , - 'M'c.w•..v\ :I.:-.7'.i IISW`"43RD �K ST y .. I Gam'4 ..rn I '',�S ST(CARR�S j.1 •- i93Tv 7 SC 511y . • I !r\ fs ( � 16tiHm .STI `SW 1 T.-I4 }l3RD•'�'� S 49RD q r _ = �'i_ • TH :,.1 s I ..,, 1I 1. . (sE,am STl ' 5�:^,� K=rx(v� a 4.7 Qs". _ �' i? _ _ -v.,- I '` - 1 % eT'A��`' {"r}-;-�^_- ;rl s n _ SE=;" pRf • _ 1 192,t0 I `V-`- LRED#REI.T,, 1 <' --. . - -r "-•:.'�' 3 . V-E s I .'�f f � ° =.;, -; ?=4'� 3, uu)i s SE II • .:y W I 0 S( sT + �� ,W -1 7 sTw r, _'-;flc:^.'r :y+-1 aSE 32' a S st 'n .R.N I$ s_ 182ti0 5T ! Ft :.x ::_,,G7v_:�-' tia� '� a. '.-Y: 1 a y • , 8 tt 'ux .y ._ .' r.. _4 4. - 1 c-,iT600•'5 ..;- I .- $` 18arx ST " .oce 1 ' , s18:TH `7'.. .. '� .•.i , SEI"M=. 1 • ` q:LYo, HI, F s I ,Q`�'� C ::` . , .:If-.k'_ _ S �,h ,... I •..' sE ' .. oJ/ _ s iec_I sr 1 . S.r,,,1 I - 0 • _ n sE lelnl i5T'•' I S 18rr i Sr .,r Ts1 u:s-v,O s® •Fy ., • " 'a'- I S 188Tii S. i s Ism sT ,4I • .. .S _ '�'� n seen• F S^. e�7 --=-- - I a ,�,- tt.•n . _ST } l ` 3 19OTH ST -.. ...7.r.▪ ......y.S! ▪ 3:WTHt ` \� >x I" sT I'- S 190TH ST s[ I 3 sr . • S 190TH :e00 <I I u, © 1 lS°n VI c?S J s[Iv°n,ti a� I. < 190711 Pla+ I-s_ rE "I 19zxo _ s 1 •_ .. . __s�°JI< 19zvo sr' -- ` °2 0IsT S 5STH S�1?2VD-I ^ST SE <. -' 1 I - ST-1 I _ol 11 _ (.e <1 ST � }f to I - r/7. L I 'h` _ - • --� } • sA 174H n mff SW 19aTH ST I _._,i I:.I▪ !• -I Isr:I© \ >', sa.'" > Q!:T.,: PA2LC D• ••` • a' ni sr I l96-H el 3 ST I 1�1 S 196 H ST S 195TH4 ST > - I 1 y ▪ _._Y y �S 145iH -I 5T SE ' • I T =_ I :u i Yam; r �`� • P�"N L,; . I 1 - S I "I S•• 198TH ST ••,' sms��i:'+ p:�, .�' .siafA'GB,3.70K >I - • - III j 198TH ST:s<::98T11 ST. - r--'— . r rm„•i„+� 'kPANK'•' - �! $E • . <1 tom. .`nl " " ::`\. ` ::;,,, - :E 199TH . _;s 200TH is a: [COTH ST g; S7. 200TH al -ST � �'' - EI I Se ST 200TH 51 3 T J!^ sT 1 "`"' „1 •a . -S I 202!10 1 sr �'I n. ".I " • "I_ $Pi c"OZYO ST �Cy f--'= a` al 6._..,�' M's t I 1 --1 I 5107ao'1� -r—� 203R0 I'ST',;.�GI 9c� ai''i �I dl "1 i . �I t. S: c moo; II I_1.' J ,..]z;�TH ST " 1 >��.H 1 i I I "i v - se=i-I-1 -20:H �.. REFERENCE: THE THOMAS GUIDE, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, PAGES 655, 656, 685 AND 686, .1999 EDITION. VICINITY MAP • e . TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON �I`� • Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No. 3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure' 1 . • .., • , ,_, (.6 - . ... . . . . • • • - • . : ,,,, . . • ' • . . i � `�� . . . : . .. . . . . _ . . . .. . . 25.. ..•----!------... ---"••••••11/4-INC ' _MEC . 2 :. i,f . �aH.�...„0 ,v, . . min.VM ftl1 LIND AVENUE SW — _==DVS STO• _ , •;1 I! ; !,WY:16Da ` �_�'� .. • / • Na9♦Mid ----�--II---------------- - ---_---- — — — - , w. — — • - +J)� ... \�du,arm wrote o � m/n,—.�--r�\� , ,etl — ,a�. x — - „- • 'I "s°Iw, iim • 3,15,3 WC Asit.a.te S. Iss• 7/',• \ Fa • CDPCxen ‘I,.. 'li ' ' , �..,, .., • 1' \\: • - I I- ---=` u;2 CPT-2 , l • ' - i f I;r' '•\ t ;r' ' CPT-4 `.CPT 3 B-Z O ' .\ Aw_,592 • 1;#':141 i - \�� CPT-I , . \ ;9 , I •7•%:".. • ' •: . I I. I . . Tiili 'hi ' �`"`,` auNll,'Igrq• 1 ^ \` mrtdr.000 I , �' \ \ _ �i M • \ '/' . ...\00_ 1 t . -•-+.,.^"may-/` _- cmanr000 " I; '; 1 Is.'\�-' _ 11 LOT 3 — + ' . �. DICES 1 -- i� Ili ‘A, PARCEL A' • ' - • (WA-94-757-CLA) - .. • mnuo ac�m�" ill 111$�\ .wua, SP.378-79.' • - • • e ---- - - —� LOT 2 I I r APPROXIMATE SCALE • •.iR put,m Kr: no • 0 ' 100 200 feet. • • • LEGEND: • -$- APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION . -$- APPROXIMATE CORE.PENETRATION TEST LOCATION • • . • REFERENCE: • • BASE PLAN PREPARED AND PROVIDED BY HORTON EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN " " DENNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC., JOB No. 9915.00, SHEET mealASSOCIATES TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING trus6 - 1 OF 1, DATED 5/21/99. PROPOSED BUILDING AND- DRIVEWAY PER SITE PLAN "SCHEME 9A" PROVIDED BY � �� RENTON, WASHINGTON' CLIENT, DATED 4/20/99. Geotechnical Consultants Proj.No: 37072 Date JUNE'.1999 Figure 2 . l ' • . . . • •- ' . . . . -. .. . .. . . . . . . • • . . . .., ..• . . . ..,.• • Cone Penetration Test - CPT-1: . . --' . . . . . - , .. . • • - Test Date:May 19,1999 . . . Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration • . Ground Surf.Elcv.:0.00 Location :Pacific Gulf Properties Site:Lind Avenue Tins test probe predrilled to 6 feet through sandy gravel fill . • • Water Table Depth:9.00 - . • • . . . ... . . • . ' . . . . .. . Qt(tsf) •Fr Ratio(%) • . • PWP(tsf) • . lc - . . . ' N60(blowslft) - . : • 00 60 120 • 180 240 300 0 1 • 2 3 • 4 • 5 -1 • 0 1 2 3 4 1.0 '1.6 2.2• - 2.8 3.4 4.0 .0 10 '20 30 ' 40 60 • .. .. . . . . . .' . . . . . . • • . . .. . , . . . _ . . ••. . - . . . • • • : . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . , ... . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . • • .; . . . . 6 . . .• . . . ' . . . .. •• . ... . . .- • • • ' • . 1 f. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . • . ., . . . • . . - . . • . . . .. • . . . . . .. . • ' . . . .. .. . 12 - .. . . . . . -.• . - . . . . . .. . . .. . . . • . . . • - '• . ' . .• . . • . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . ' • • ' . • . • . . • . • ' . . • • • . . . •c . . . . . . It . . , • • •• . . '• .. , . a) • ' • . , . ". 0 . . . . .• ' . . . . . . . •. • •.. . . . , .. . . . . . ., . . • • • • .. . . , . • . . . • - .. . . . . . ' . . .. . . . ' ' - • • • • • • . . . . • 21 ' . . • • ••. • . . . . • . . • . ..- . . t . 24 • . . . . .. • .• . -. . . • .. . . - • ' . ., , . . ., . • • ' • . . • . . . . . . , . 27 --- • : • - •• . . . . . . .. .. .. . . .. . . , .. .. • • ... . . , cf....• . . , . . . . . . . . ..- •- .. ` • ... 30 • .• . . .. . ' . . . • . . .. . • . . ., Qt nomialized for .Fr kap...100*F/(Qt-Sigmav) • .'After Jeffetiee end Davies(1991) ' After Jeffedes and Davies(1993) . .. . • •- ' .unequal end urea effects Gamma-120.3 pcf - Ic<1.25-Oravdly sands .. , .1.25<Ic<1.90-Clean to wilt),sand . .. ._ . .. . • 1.90<10<2.54-Silty sand to sandy eilt:,,. . . . . , . . . •• 2.54<lc<2.82-Clayey milt to silty clay • " ' . . . . . .. 2.82<lc<3.22-Chip • '.. . . ' '. ... .. . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . ' . , . . PROJECT NO.3707-1 DATE May 20.1099 • DRAWN BY:Ketth Brown . • • - • . Terra Associates Inc. . •. . • . . . FIGURE 3 . . •. . . . .. • • Cone Penetration Test - CPT-2 . . • Test Date:May 19,1999 •Operator Northwest Cone Exploration • • : Ground Surf,Elev.:0.00 ' • . , • Location :Pacific Gulf Properties Sites Lind Avenue Dissipation test performed at 8.5 feet in clayey silt" Water Table Depth:9.00• : . • Qt(tsf) - Fr, Ratio (%) • . PWP(tsf) lc N60 (blows/ft) - • 0 60 120 180 240 300 0 1 2 3 4 5 -1 0 '1 .2 ' 3 4. 1.0 1.6, 2.2 2.8. 0 3.4 • 4.0• 0 10'• .20 ,30 40 50 • .,1,(3 . . .. . . . • • 12 :• . to . on . . , w . . °i • . L 15 • 18 24 i . 27 • . _ 30 ' .Qt normalized for Fr Ratio a 100•F/(Qt-SiBnav) •. . ' .' After)efTeriei endDavies(1991) After 1e0'eue.end Davies(1993) .' . unequal end area erect. - ' Gamma o 120.3 pcC .. 1c<1.25-Gravelly Banda . '' •. •. . 1.25<lc<1.90-Clean to Ely sand• • 1.90<lc<2.54-Silty sand to'andy ailt ' • . 2.54<le<2.82-Clayey altto silty day : . 2.82<Ic<3.22-C1ayB. .. • - ' • PROJECT NO.37o7-1 DATE:May 20,1999 • DRAWN BY:Kotth Brown • ,. Terra Associates,.Inc. . FIGURE 4 Cone Penetration :Test: CPT-3. • Surf'Elev..0.00 . Test Date:May 19,1999 Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration Groundn TableurElev. •0.00 . • Location :Pacific Gulf Properties Site:Lind Avenue Qt(tsf) • Fr- Ratio(%) PWP (tsf).. . . Ic - N60 (blows/ft) 0 60 120 180• 240 300 0 1 ; ' 2 3 .• 4 ••5 -1 � 0 '• 1 • 2 3 4 1.0 •. 1.6. ' 2.2 ':2.8 3.4 4.0 0 '10 . 20 30. •40 50 ilill • . • 3 • ._ • 9ill ' 12 I ::IIt . .. . 21 p 24 { ' .. • 27 1 ——— 4 • 30 • After lefferiss and Davies(1991) • After lo0'eries and Davies(1993) Qt nosmalimd for - Fr Ratio�100'F/(Qt-Sigmav): .. • [ac 1.25-Gravelly suds --' - •• ' unequal end area effects Gamma 120.3 pcf • .. ., - 1.25<la<1.90-goon to,silty sand • 1.90<lo<2.54'-Silty sand tosandysilt 234<ic<2.82-Clayey silt toniftyday ' • ' 2.82 do<3.22-Qsys - PROJECT NO.3707-1 DATE May 20,1999 . DRAWN BY:•KOlth Brown' Terra Associates, Inc. • FIGURE 5 .;'..:.. • • • Cone:.Penetrat on Test - CPT-4 • Test Date•May 19,1999 • Operator :Northwest Cone Exploration Ground Surf.Elev.:0.00 Location :Pacific Gulf Properties Site:Lind Avenue Water Table Depth:9.00 • Qt(tsf) Fr- Ratio (%) PWP.(tsf) . .Ic .. - • N60(blows/ft) 0 60 120 180 240 300 0 1 2 • 3 •4 5 ' -1 0 1 • 2 • 3. 4 1.0 1.6 ''2.2 2.8 3.4 4.0 . 0 • 10 20 30- •,40 50 0 • ' 6 12 • .r) f • 15 - , • 18 . . . : • r . • 21 24 27 • • 30 Qt normalized for: . Fr Ratio=100•F/(Qt-Sigmav) •' • , • •After!offence end Darien(1991) • ..After Jefeuer end Device(1993): . unequal end area efTecta- . Gamma=120.3 pcf Ic<1.25,-Gravelly send' •.'. • - . ', 1.25<lc<1.90-Clean to silty Bend • . • ' • 1:90<lc<2.54-Silty sand to sandy ailt '• . • . 2.54<Ic<2.82-Cleyey'elttosiltyclay . . ' 2.82<la<3.22.Clays • PROJECT No.3707-1 DATE:May 20,1999 DRAWN BY:Ranh Brown •- _ Terra ASSOCIates,'InC. FIGURE 6 • • • I; CPT=1 .Soil .Log . . Logged• by: :.NWC • • . • • • • .• • . . : • . Date: 5/19/99 • . • Approximate Elev. 17'. • Consistency/. a. Estimated Moisture Soil Classification , • • Relative Depth E N60 •• .Content Density . (ft.) c . • (%) • • Pre-drilled to 6 feet. No CPT data. . . - - • • . • • • • • Silty sand to sandy silt. . . Loose IBM 2 .. - �, .. .� -� � � � •Soft � - _�� - � 1 � � .. Sand to silty sand. : : - - 10 •. •• Medium - Dense . - 16 - • - 15 • . : 14. Gravelly sand. • - Medium 20 23 • Dense _ • • . • Sand to silty sand: • — 25 20 Dense. . • 34 • • -30 32 • • Terminated at 31.5 feet. . • Groundwater indicated at 9 feet. • • • CPT .SOIL LOG mis • TERRA • • LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING t ��`"" ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants 'Prof. No. T-3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure 7 , . .1.--...--....-----.........-....--.....---...-- ..._. .. , •- _ . . . . . . . . : . .• . • .. . . • . . . .• . ..: .' . . CPT-2 Soil Log . - -. .. . - • : .. .•• - • . Logged by:, .NWC •••• . . • : - . • - . . • •-I•AporOXimat Elev. 17'. Date: • 5/19/99 • • . . : • . . . . . . • . . • - • Consistency/ . I Estimated Moisture . . • • Soil Classification • . • R Depth RelativeE N60. Content . - • Density . (f:t.) jj (0/0) . , . . ' FILL;'sand to sandy silt. • • • . . . - 12 . • . . • . • • . • • , . . . . • . Dense • • - • • . • • . • • • • . . • • • " • _ . . „ - Clayey silt to clay. • •.• • • Very - • • • ' Soft . _ . . . • . . • ' • . . • . , . . Sand to silty sand. - —-10:' • 11 . . . - • • . • . • 14- • _ . . • • . Dense • • - . • . _ . •. . . . , • . . • -7. 20 • •• • . - - 17 • . , • 26 . • • _ . • . . • • ' - • - . . . --25 . 26 . . . • •- • . ' Dense - • • • —30 . - • 32 . • . . . . - . . • . . , Terminated at 30.5 feet. . • • Groundwater indicated at 9 feet. • • - • . . . • . ' CPT SOIL LOG immelit TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING i•- ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON iligurglial. • Geotechnlcal Consultants I • 1Proj. No. T-3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 • Figure 8 • . - . CPT-3 Soil. L-og :.: :- - Logged .:by: :N C . Date: 5/19/99 . -.Approximate Elev. 17' • • Consistency/ • Q Estimated Moisture . • Soil Classification Relative Depth E . N60 Content - Density (ft.) . ccn :• (%) • . Sand to-silty sand. Medium Dense - , .- - - 3 • • • to . - • . • Dense 44 • 5 • 24 • • • Loose - Clayey silt to clay. . Soft - . . • •• • Sand to silty sand. Loose: - . 5 . Gravelly sand: • _ • . • 1:5: 24 • • Medium Dense. - • . to ` Dense 29 • —20 30 - 25 : • • Sand to silty sand. Medium Dense Dense • • • '-30 30 • Terminated.at 31 feet. Groundwater indicated at 9 feet. CPT SOIL LOG minTERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING t ��`` \ ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants iProJ. No: . T-3707-2 Date .JIJNE 1999 Figure 9 • . . . CPT-4 Soil ' Log . :.: Logged by NWC - ' . • . Date: 5/19/99. Approximate Elev. 16' • • _ .. Consistency/ • a Estimated.. Moiisture • • Soil Classification ' . , • •Relative Depth E N60. . . Content . Density (ft.) n (%) • • FILL;•gravelly sand.to sandy silt: • • - • •. •. ?. : - Loose • Dense. : - •. 30 . • '• • • • Loose 5 3 . • • . • .Clayey silt to clay. . ' • :Sand to gravelly sand. • • • - 10• • - 24' 15 :• .17. Medium. - ' • :Dense - . 25. .... • "-20• 21 20. . • • -25 2a • Sand to silty sand. • : - - . . . . . - : Dense 28 • Terminated at 30 feet. • _ . Groundwater indicated at 9 feet. • • • • CPT SOIL. LOG assmTERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING kosios� \" ASSOCIATES .RENTON, .WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants . Proj. No._ -T-3707-2 Date'JUNE 1999 Figure 10 Boring No.. B-1 •• . . Logged by: • KPR • • • Date: 7/17/97 • Approximate Elev. • ' Consistency/ • Q (N) Moisture Soil Description • •Relative Depth . Blows/ Content Notes Density (ft.) ., ft. •(/o) •' . Fill;.gray-brown silty. medium SAND with : Sampled cuttings some gravel,moist. (SM) • . • • - . • . Medium dense Fill;brown medium SAND with silt and some . ' . 18 . 5.6 . gravel, medium dense,.moist: (SP-SM) . Becomes water-bearing at 4.5 feet _• .5 • • Gray organic clayey SILT with peat fibers,. ' saturated, low plasticity. (OH) :• • Very soft _ -2. 72.0 Pp<0.25 tsf _ LL=55. _��. . PL=32 Black silty fine SAND,saturated: (SM) • Medium dense PI=23 10 28.1 Black fine SAND with silt,water-bearing.: • .20 '27.0' (SP-SM) • Medium dense _ • — 15 - Black silty fine SAND with interbeds of fine - . black sand, water-bearing. (SM/SP) Medium dense 23 31.0 . =20 • • Black silty fine SAND interbedded with •layers of black fine to medium sand,water- Dense - - 30 ' 32.0 ' bearing, (SM/SP) I • —25 . _ Three feet of sand Black fine to medium SAND,water-bearing. : heave at 27 feet. (SP) Dense 35 26.6 • Flushed with water. Test boring terminated at 29 feet. Groundwater seep age encountered at 4.5 feet.'Hole plugged with two bags of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. BORING LOG • TERRA COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY 6 ��``\"Fagin ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707 . Date AUG 1997 •Figure 11 : Boring No. B-2 . Logged by: , KPR • .. . , . Date: 7/17/97 Approximate Elev. • • . Consistency/ a (N) Moisture Soil. Description . , • . Relative Depth E Blows/ Content Notes Density (ft.) ft. (%) ' Fill;brown fine to medium SAND with silt • - - and gravel fill cuttings at surface, moist. . - . • . . (SP-SM) - . • Fill• ;brown fine to medium.SAND with silt :Medium dense 24 . 8.5 • ' and some gravel, moist to wet. (SP-SM) _ Dark gray-brown organic silty CLAY,.. — 5 • - Pp=1.0 tsf • fractured to5.5 feet,wet, low plasticity. . Medium stiff • .5 . 51.2. ' (OUCL) - • - _ Pp <0.25 tsf Gray organic clayey SILT with peat fibers, ~' . ' DD=.70.5 pcf saturated, low plasticity. (OL) • . . Soft- • • • .LL'=41 Black silty fine SAND,saturated. (SM) Lbose . 67.3 PL=31 .- 5 33.1 PI=.10 Dark brown-gray silty very fine SAND with — 10 interbeds of non-plastic sandy silt, saturated. Medium dense . 10 27.8 ' (SM/ML) " Dark brown-gray silty very fine SAND, - 10 . 27.5 saturated. (SM) - Medium dense • • • • 15 . .32.5 Black silty,fine SAND,saturated..(SM) Medium dense : ' Drills denser • Black fine to medium.SAND interbedded with layers of dark gray-brown, non-plastic Very. dense . 53 27.3 - • sandy SILT,water-bearing. (SP/SM) —25 Black fine SAND with silt,wood fragment at - . 1.5 feet of sand 28 feet,water-bearing. (SP-SM) Dense - heave at 27 feet 46 26.7 • Test boring terminated at 29 feet. Groundwater seep age encountered at 6:5 feet. Hole plugged with two bags of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. • BORING LOG TERRA COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY t ��mmi�```\\" ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants Proj. No. T-3707 Date AUG 1997 Figure 12 Boring No. :B -3 ' • Logged'by: KPR •. • • Date: 7/17/97. • • • :Approximate Elev. . . Consistency/ Q (N) • Moisture Relative Depth E Blows/ Content Notes . Soil Description o Density - •(ft•).. c . ft. .(/%) . Fill;brown silty fine SAND with gravel • : • cuttings at surface, moist. (SM) • . . . ' Fill;gray silty medium sand with gravel, Medium.dense _ • saturated. (SM) . 17 •• .' 14.4 . • Fill;gray medium•SAND with silt and gravel, • Loose .. - 5 12.9 - • water-bearing. (SP-SM) ..- g . •52.0 • Dark brown,organic clayey SILT with peat -•Medium stiff fibers,fractured, saturated. (OL) Pp<0.25 tsf Brown,organic SILT with wood Very•soft ` . . :1 94.1 DD=27.8 pcf fragments and peat fibers,wet, low: _ . plasticity. (OL) • As above,but non-plastic.'(OL) Very soft —1 -• • 5 ' 22.6 Black,silty,fine to medium SAND,saturated (SM}-oose,. Black medium SAND,water-bearing. (SP) • • Dense : 34 25.1 — .• b • Sand heave into auger at 17 feet. • Black medium SAND,water-bearing. (SP) Very.dense. 62 29.4 Flushed wi• th water. • As above; (SP) Very dense r 10 12.8 • • • . As above. (SP) . . Dense - 1 40 32.8 Test boring terminated at 29 feet. Groundwater seep age encountered at 2.5 feet. Hole plugged with 2 bags of bentonite chips mixed with cuttings. . • Erroneously high value due to heave filling sampler prior to drive. • BORING LOG TERRA COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY FACILITY gmeis" ASSOCIATES RENTON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants I Proj. No: T-3707 Date AUG 1997 Figure 13 r_ • : STEEL ROD _. PROTECTIVE SLEEVE T— r • r r • HEIGHT VARIES ; r. - - . . . ,. : SURCHARGE • (SEE•NOTES). . . 1.-....' SURCHARGE • • • r r • • •• OR- FILL .•.� . • •. a OR FILL- •. r• • �' . • NO • T TO SCALE NOTES:' 1. 'BASE CONSISTS OF 1/2"• THICK, 2'x2'• PLYWOOD WITH CENTER DRILLED 5/8"..DIAMETER HOLE. . . 2. BEDDING••MATERIAL, IF. REQUIRED, SHOULD CONSIST OF CLEAN COARSE SAND.. •: • -3. MARKER ROD IS 1/2" DIAMETER STEEL ROD•THREADED .AT BOTH.ENDS. • . 4. MARKER ROD IS ATTACHED TO BASE BY NUT AND WASHER ON EACH SIDE. OF BASE. • . 5. PROTECTIVE SLEEVE SURROUNDING MARKER ROD' SHOULD CONSIST OF 2" DIAMETER . PLASTIC TUBING... SLEEVE IS NOT ATTACHED TO ROD.OR BASE. . • 6. ADDITIONAL SECTIONS OF STEEL ROD CAN BE CONNECTED WITH THREADED COUPLINGS. 7. 'ADDITIONAL SECTIONS. OF PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE CAN BE .CONNECTED WITH. PRESS—FIT PLASTIC COUPLINGS. 8...STEEL MARKER ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST 6" ABOVE TOP OF PLASTIC PROTECTIVE SLEEVE. .9. STEEL MARKER ROD SHOULD EXTEND AT LEAST 1" ABOVE TOP OF FILL SURFACE. • • ER TYPICAL ND SE 1 LEMENT MARKER DETAIL • s''.-:• TERRA AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING i's;;egszi. ASSOCIATES . .RENTON, .WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants . Proj.No. 3707-2 Date JUNE 1999 Figure •14 . • • '; • • • • 12" MINIMUM' WIDE --- • • .• • . . FREE—DRAINING GRAVEL- • • . , • • SLOPE TO DRAIN • • 12 . .` • • • • • 1/4 ' •...• •:• .:..• .. • • • •. EXCAVAT : . ED SLOPE NN-= (SEE' REPORT'FOR : _ APPROPRIATE' . - • • • • 4:;•.;;;.• :.• *." . , • '•• :::. :.••••••• •.' • i INCLINATIONS) • • • COMPACTED STRUCTURAL • \R�. • _• BACKFILL .. . . •. . . . • • kiggi:k,...,.,.. . . .. ': : . - . 7 i, i, i� is /.� ,� . \\:.•••••••••••••••.A..02`.1.:-•*44.4.24.:4t‘i ..''' - ' . • , . ' `'' �,�..�\/,./.. /, 1. .\XX. L 12". OVER THE PIPE • . - 4 DIAMETER PVC 3 BELOW THE PIPE: PERFORATED' PIPE • • . NOT TO SCALE • • • RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL >••: '' ' TERRA LIND AVENUE WAREHOUSE BUILDING �� seutus ASSOCIATES TON, WASHINGTON Geotechnical Consultants . • Proj.No.• 3707-2 Date JUN E• 1999 Figure 15 eo ier� • g � • CEOPIERTM Foundation Company Northwest September 14, 2000 RECEIVED SEP202CO Mr. Tom de Wolf Ledcor Industries Inc. DAVID KEHLE,ARCHITECT 9655 SE 36th Street, Suite 210 Mercer Island, Washington 98040 Design Submittal Geopier Soil Reinforcement • 360 Networks Building Renton, Washington Dear Mr. de Wolf: This letter presents our design submittal for the Geopier intermediate foundation system for the new 360 Networks Building in Renton, Washington. Geopier reinforcement will be used to support the building foundations and floor slab. The planned Geopier layout is shown on the attached Sheets GP-1 and GP- 2. The following paragraphs document our design of the Geopier foundation system. Geopier Reinforcement Design As shown on the referenced plan, 30-inch diameter Geopier elements are planned to reinforce the compressible soils beneath the building foundations and floor slab. The Geopier elements will extend through the existing sand fill and underlying soft silt soils to the medium dense sand layer. Based on our recommendations, we understand that the footings have been sized based on an allowable bearing pressure of 5 ksf with a 1/3 increase in consideration of seismic loading. Structural load information was provided by Mr. Joe Shutler of Shutler Consulting Engineers. On this basis, we understand that typical column loads are as follows: Footing Type Size Load (kips) F7.0 7.0 x 7.0 245 SAC F7.5 7.5 x 7.5 250 ®C'j NTONNNo, F8.0 8.0x8.0 275 F8.5 8.5 x 8.5 315 32000 F9.0 9.0 x 9.0 355 F 10.5 10.5 x 10.5 465 �S® Wall loads typically range from about 8 to 10 kips per lineal foot. The west sill wall has a load of about 1 kip per lineal foot. We understand that shear walls will develop end edge pressures of up to 6.7 ksf due to overturning seismic loading. We understand that the design ground floor slab load is 400 psf. The load is generated from battery storage, which can occupy 1/4 to 1/3 of the slab area. The ground floor slab consists of a 6-inch thick slab reinforced with#4 bars at 18-inches on-centers each way. Generators and associated fuel tanks will be placed adjacent to the building on the west side. Subsurface information provided by Terra Associates has been used as a basis for our design. Site subsurface conditions generally consist of existing sand fills underlain by a soft compressible clayey silt layer. The silt layer is underlain by relatively competent sands at a depth of about 11 feet beneath current site grades. The existing sand fill is typically medium dense and extends to a depth of about 6 feet (425) 646-2995 • (425) 646-3118 FAX • 40 LAKE BELLEVUE,SUITE 100 • BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98005 Ledcor Industries 360 Networks Building . beneath building subgrade, where the soft clayey silt is encountered. The underlying native sands are medium dense. The Geopier system has been designed based on a maximum allowable Geopier cell capacity(maximum load distributed to each Geopier element and adjacent bearing area) of 70 kips. The Geopier elements will extend through the upper existing sand fills and soft clayey silt layer to the underlying competent soils. Based on our review of subsurface information, we anticipate Geopier depths beneath subgrade of 10 to 12 feet. To provide more uniform support at foundation and floor slab grade, the Geopier will be constructed with aggregate up to a depth of about 3 feet beneath slab subgrade. .Sand will be used to construct the upper portion of the Geopier. Settlement For our analyses, settlements are first calculated for a zone extending from the bottom of the footing or floor slab to a depth of 2.5 feet (one Geopier diameter) beneath the bottom of the Geopier element. The additional depth beneath the bottom of the Geopier is added as significant reinforcement or soil improvement occurs below the bottom of the Geopier. This upper zone is the soil depth that is reinforced by the Geopier elements. As the soils beneath this zone (lower zone) are relatively competent, lower zone settlements are negligible. The weighted modulus method (Bowles 1988) is used to estimate settlement in the Geopier reinforced zone. This method is described in the Geotechnical Engineering Division/ASCE publication "Control of Settlement and Uplift of Structures Using Short Aggregate Piers" by Dr. Evert C. Lawton, Dr. Nathaniel Fox and Dr. Richard L. Handy. Based on our analyses and on load tests conducted on sites with similar soil conditions, we estimate that total settlements will be less than 1-inch. Differential settlements between columns would be less"than about'/Z-inch. Geopier Modulus(Load)Test A downward load test will be conducted on a representative Geopier element at the time of construction to verify design capacities. The test will be conducted in accordance with the Project Specification (Section 02360). The load test results will be reviewed and evaluated by an experienced geotechnical engineer from Geopier Foundation Company Northwest. Geopier Installation The Geopier reinforcement will be installed in accordance with the Project Specification 02360. The installation will be conducted under the supervision of an experienced geotechnical engineer from Geopier Foundation Company Northwest. We would recommend that Terra Associates conduct special inspection/monitoring services during installation of the Geopier reinforcement We appreciate the opportunity of working with you on this project. If you have any questions or require further inf. - '_~- 'lease call. `NP,LKER 4�, c,pf W e, °y Very truly yours, hP� ti 41* cs, GEOPIER FOUNDATION COMPANY NORTHWEST o ck Fs c,s „ h SinNA,gENV James W. son, P.E. Attachments: Geopier Location Plan, GP-1 and GP-2 Geopier Specification Section 02360 Typical Calculations Cgeopier" GEOP/ER'Foundation Company Northwest y. **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0005732 Amount: 1, 003 .63 10/13/00 11:16 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: KEHLE ARCH#14071 Init: JEJ Project #: LUA00-137 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 125360-0062 Site Address: 3600 LIND AV SW Total Fees: 1, 003 .63 This Payment 1, 003 .63 Total ALL Pmts: 1, 003 .63 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000.345.81.00.0007 Environmental Review 1, 000. 00 000.05 .519 .90.42 .1 Postage 3 .63 1 I.