No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-007glop NOW 9 Olt 41 lt.mA 1rm - - 40 Re t FA za OUT37 35 U. I V90 nd Property located at N . E . 10th Street and Monroe Avenue N . E . APPLICANT MacPherSon / s , Inr - TOTAL AREA 2 3 . 2 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N . E . 10th Street EXISTING ZONING G3-1 Single Family RestdeDtlal EXISTING USE Vacant | land PROPOSED USE Single / Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, Single Family Residential COMMENTS EXHIBIT #1 14 c v. fi J 1C1TZ1 CL ate® Avg,N En ED EP G3 1=--1 1:3 ED ni-.7 tm r:9 C3C=3 C C:3C:p 7 CD c3 C7 p LYN NV48° 7 N. . 1 11-1 ED I:9 [=:1 =I l'- i D r a ,'" Ell- 1 pap 4- - AV C3 c7 CD ma- 1:13 Lirl" C) t:3 tO g0C5Dr=3 E:i°1:31ElLt-ri T P._riSalica b to {? f-KAt_SM1_i _1a _ !11,NtMT. ____ g. v.,Di_ MO- 4 ! 1r AVM. ILT- N.>i.. . E;rci;:;)0:iniiggE,, 4 cit% n 0 13il1: z z z sigissill „,ateU. E 0 C a oi.,!.,:,:,::.:.:...:.:...,:i. 4,14:.,1f...:... coy 0 4 DEl - 4 -kA:- 0 1:3 0 : 1-1--. a u i sa C E R II p NevIfIller,t: i.,,J p_ 0 (;) D 0 0 0 OD CD ,_______ e G3 P 13 05 ‘% - 0 " 0 e L J s',t,. FA. yLo1i N•4. a s0 0 0 D Ol.YM1'IA AVE. II) o Is til oQrotate N G3 -Li 4-. 1 .,Z 0 , ri D0000r:3 0 D la..0 0 t--i n 4MY LtMKII 4 czCI ® Q Q 1=.1 CI C [ C"2 C N. I ZN 1 N . I O(/ n Yf s C> D C= CI OO ® L L Ica p s Mil ell MI • es w • toed r wt w If e y aQ C7 C] © C 3 C7 © C7 CDs :_ Ela N.e. 1 Z3RDG?0 23 aD 97 yy01Q0L7C) firiC3o1 V.Irm1'!d3 y3! yS/ S Sz/ go, Ydd7 s/L/S N6/9 '?i $ Y7 j 58 1 Si+lfl.e iiW«y RCS. ti N" 41 f4:::MYeNt:%%.X....x.X.4:.:—. .,. • 30 t 0r 4.12 I Y 0 i t a t s a F 4t a,. > W 4 , i,. i,@ 7 ---g z ID 0 ID E. i grrH r. U En...,„'1 0 BB02Dr----- .:::0 1...:_i r--1 1 1 1111, 0 3LA1- 1"= Zoa1 I 5u6J061 5L U E=7.! MAL pHozs®NS INC. IZ ZON!% N0. R-DO -77 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Berbera C.€1T ns being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that 8 he is the chief C' '• .= of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and. has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- ti ^- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington; NOTI'CE-OF ..? and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained PUBLIC HEAD'.uSE;at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton RE RING LANDMIN E_N Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the HEARING EXAMINER Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, RENTON,WASHINGTON 1 A public hearing will be 'I Notice of Public I held by the Renton land use Washington.That the annexed is a hearing examiner at his reg. ular meeting in the council Hearing Renton, L rid, Use. lleering Examiner, chambers,city hall,Renton, Washington,on February 8, 1977,at 9:00 a.m.to consid- 1iPetitionserthefollowingpetitions: as it was published in regular issues(and 1.REZONE F:•t,. . -1 , not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period I e No. R-00 77, • ..- y oca ed on 1. . 10th St. between of one consecutive issues,commencing on the Monroe Ave. N.E. and Q Olympia Ave.N.E.Legal c fkI1uery 77 description on file in the day of 19 and ending the Renton Planning Department.. i • All interested persons to said petitions are invited to day of 19 both dates• be present at the public inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- hearing on February 8,1977 scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee at 9:00 a.m.to express theirAltopinions. en charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of ''', which Gordon in DirectorhasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundredwordsfortheRentonPlanningDirector first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent Published in The Renton insertion. Record-Chronicle Jan. 30, 1977. R4156 1 C/6---fliec.—/-611./p chief clerW' 30Subscribedandsworntobeforemethis day of Junµder 197 arc.-c...., RE Notary Public in an for the State of Was RECFI1 EesidingatKent,King K V 1-1 Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June FEB 25 19 9th, 1955. 6— Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, 1,.. ' - - ' . adopted by the newspapers of the State. l'A. G DEQP V.P.C.Form No.87 ic: ,R - c° 7- 7 Renton City Council 3/14/77 Page 5 Old Business - Continued Community Services Committee Report '- Continued Sartori School The Community Services Committee report recommended that the Council Lease I authorize the Mayor to proceed with the lease renewal for Sartori School , subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE LEASE AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Grant presented memo from Administrative Assistant Custer concerning problems encountered with Section 8 of the Code of Ethics Board of Ethics : Ordinance concerning membership of the Board of Ethics and terms of office and wording. The letter requested review of the ordinance to consider deleting requirement that Board of Ethics- appointees be mem- bers of the Boards of Trustees of the required community organizations, i .e. , Renton League of Women Voters and Renton Ecumenical Council . MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, REVIEV OF CODE OF ETHICS ORDI NANCE BE REFERRED TO' THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION AS REQUESTED AND COPIES BE DISTRIBUTED TO ALL COUNCILMEN BY THE CITY CLERK. CARRIED. Senior Citizen j Upon discussion of change in location of Senior Citizens building Center along Cedar River and amendment to the Referendum 29 fund application reflecting site change, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED' BY GRANT, MATTER OF DESIGN AND CONFIGURATION OF THE SENIOR CITIZEN BUILDING BE • REFERRED TO THE MAYOR'S SENIOR CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR DISCUS- SION AND RECOMMENDATION. Councilwoman Thorpe noted Community Services Committee would continue to meet on this subject. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Acting Ways and Means Committee Chairwoman Shinpoch presented commit- Committee Report ' tee report recommending second and final readingsof an ordinance changing the zoning classification from GS-lto R-1 , known as the MacPherson property located at the northeast corner of Monroe N. E. MacPherson Rezone and N. E. 10th` St. , having been on first reading 3/7/77. Following readings by the City Clerk, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3118 The Ways & Means Committee report recommended second and final Norwood Rezone reading of an ordinance providing for the rezoning of property from R-884-76 General classification to Business (B-1 ) for property located at . the northeast corner of N. 30th and Park Ave. N. , known as the Norwood Rezone. The Ordinance had been placed on first reading 2/28, second and final reading 3/7/77 and failed for lack of approval by majority of the quorum and placed on the table for one week. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL REMOVE ORDINANCE FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL PLACE THE ORDINANCE ON SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Following the readings, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. elcC;(111.41Mead, Cit Clerk I EXP111 22 CITY OF RENTON WARRANT DISTRIBUTION 3/14/77 FUND TOTAL WARRANTS MACHINE VOIDS: NO.1 1293 5 - 1112958, CURRENT FUND 58, 153,82 PARKS AND RECREATION FUND 12,805. 17 STREET FUND 627a509. 72 LIBRARY FUND 6, 976,46 • CETA FUND 2, 317.43 . ANTIRECESSION FUND 10201 .64 STREET FORWARD THRUST 107, 215.00 WATERWORKS UTILITIY FUND- i56, l19.76 AIRPORT FUND 1, 031 .01 1975 WATER & SEWER CONSTR 01,373.09 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 119, 948. 73 FIREMEN PENSION 11, 978.26 TOTAL OF ALL - WARRANTS R197,030.09 44E, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS, OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, HAVING RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERT,IFICATION .THAT MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES WAVE 'BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 12959 - THROUGH NO. 13161 IN 'THE AMOUNT OF 197, 030•09 THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH 1977. COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN • • •. . • • • i • • • MEMBER MEMBER CITY'RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3117 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING:, THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL 1 CLASSIFICATI.ON DISTRICT .(GS-1) TO RESIDENCE " DISTRICT :.(R-1)' WHEREAS.,I:`under:',Chapter'•.7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) . , of Ordinance No. 16 28.:known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , :as 'amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewi;ththe".`,prop'erty. hereinbelow .described has heretofore been zoned.':'as` Generral • Classificiation District (GS-l) ; WHEREAS a proper;"petition for change of zone classification of said property'. has; been filed with the Planning Department on or about y.anuary 11, „1977, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing E).,:aminer for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been -`held thereon on or about February' 8 , 1977 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the Cit_y 's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, :and the City Council having duly considered all matters. relevant :thereto., and all parties having been heard appearing in' support. thereof or in opposition thereto , • NOW THHEREFORE,.. THE CITY. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN •AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I The .'following described property in the City of Renton ,is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-1)as hereinbelrw specified, the Public .Works Director and the Planning D:irector are hereby authorized •and directed `:to...change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence ;said rezoning, to-wit: Lots• '6 ,' '7 , `8 ,. ;9.- .and 10 of Mapes ° 1st Addition, as recorded in.' Volume 60, page 7 , together with with the west 1/2 of the north. ;1/2.`of the northwest 1/4 of the. southwest :1/4, of the. northeast 1/4 of Section 9 , Township; 23; Range 5, less east 30 feet , less we'st 30 feet and less the south 30 feet together with vl the :street lcatedby Ordinance #2883 . Said : property,. :being located on Northeast corner of Monroe:Avenue .N.E . and ;iv'.F;. lOtu St . , Renton, Wash. ) SECTION "II`'}` This Ordinan e sra?. 1_ be effective upon its passage, approval zand five _.(5) days after its publication. PASSED BY. THE; CITY, COUNCIL this 14thday of March, 1977 Qatt-dOe.eft2 Delores A. :lead, Cit., Cleric APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of March, 1977 .. - fe I r J Dela t, - •Charle J ureic i, Mayor Approved as to form: er:.1/ti M. S e1.lan, City Attorney Date of Publication; 3`-18-77 J// /n March 7, 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: MacPherson's , Inc. FILE NO. R-007-7.7 LOCATION: ' Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N.E. and N.E. 10th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from GS-1 (General Classification District) (residential 35, 000 square feet) to R-1 (Single Family Residence) . SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to RECOMMENDATION: conditions . Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions-- PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject rezone on February 8, 1977. APPEAL PERIOD: The appeal period for this request expired on February 22 , 1977, and is subsequently being submitted to the City Council for final approval . If you require additional information on this matter, please contact the office of the Land Use Hearing Examiner. OP amen . IMagstadt Hearing Examiner JLM:mg Attachment i• •, - -,.L:::;,41-1 toe -•1: •• t•1 I, Q t,• r!'!.,..“B, ''',•1[..;...1: :: • li: :•,... . p-I 0 i rs r.• Y. ! II . 11 • 1 ti• xo9: pili&o. riA,. _ g, i . f .+il irk 'i 1. 1 -- /1 .• • C.o 4__ Ifi i/e i EII in r, ki t. i 7 SO I dt9 •. i 1ARE1 'M..,jz G-ir#oo is;g .i:1 n F-.....,, zt--.; N i. ' I 1. i t4.illi.ir_1* .iii N \ vm117 l,, ' 4 :: : -... 1 . 1 ps1 .1T,IA \' ;1. .1fl 1, " Illp .2 Pr' Er •' 1,3 tsti' b `' A•!. 3 r, '%4 I : •• Y . 1, •.•.• M. .; y1••I•1r r•..,i` ..•. r'., nr••:.•.,.. ZS4 I:. .••: :,; ' 1 'I:7' i 14: rr9 i I • 1,.,, Rail r ui a 17 ..7. a.r t.^ 7 yy .e A. lr • Ji.1 i 1 • o ,,•. fi` T a;. y/ 11 •RLIu . r,. .ciigtliasart _ Nt, .. Tz..ilit y... :: .q;i1611,4 I REZONE MAC PHERSON'S, INC; App1 . #R-007-77; Rezone from GS-1 to R-1; Property located at N.E. 10th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. I APPLICANT MacPherson's. Inr. TOTAL AREA 1 3.2 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 10th Street IExIs1ING ZONING GS-1 Single Family Residential ' EXISTING USE Vacant land PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Resi. ential COMMENTS EXHIBIT #1 1 . R-7- C? .' a 1, al EP 13 c3 co t="1 I=1 Ifi 0 0 C.:1 El Ne. fro fjo#1 ur; 0:11.'123""rniiiiiNc3sm.ec31,10031 ric ) 0 NI 1:1 0 1 13 CP 1=3 CI CO C=1 Eli CS c23 ED 104'4 Pik in Et OC31:31:30001 0 EpzI-T-2.3%,81 a 11..1 0zi_ . .,o a s•A NA 0 ji r ag 1 t 0 L.J ' 34111C1 u% urn+. Mull/44 41.••.•...,••••• 0 D I ut n I 1 LI 0g• cd El LIJ -... 2 on, 00n I-1 ri,1 If .1 MONNEN Z-44.;„.11 0 1 r„,,Q--•,pAotilst > r-1 cg U s:,•::$5.,:iA:::N: . 3--L> 0 • 4ik.F. r. D * '-' B.,i r. uk ibeitimmiliiiiiiiiiii.::•-.. :bil;:-..1:.::::.:, Ai 400 EP r EH . .::,.....,:::*:::•::::::,.:::::::::::::::,.?::*:<,: f*.,::.:::„ a,„44::::•:::::::::::::,,•-.d.A.,:Er,,?: 131 - C;) 1:::3i:i*::,:ti.%::•:::::te:*:::•:,:•:::z::•*,c •-• ' 1 4" 0l*i•:!:!::%:Kii**IK:.::AM:::*:: • ' A:.:**:,:•?:ii; hen AlE. IA L C3 C3 °T: KV rd144 #r• 1 111 iffl GI ti. Et. a P C0810a.""Eam41163T41151911 r:3 g 0 0 u Q 0 6 nO I Ejo13trA0 n I o IA u 0 11 Mt. rrit fr. 4b•r 0 ociacim000go 0 orpi0a11:1 0., DG II a d ° c) ° r=1 1131 °I:i a CI C3D TosipcDnp0D I El) 1 0 0 El tCfa000aDi ,E3 0 ° 0 riC3 0 0 k t23 0 1:1tl ' a ° 0 i 410 ' olo o OoDa_.0 D 1 L7/ 13 CI 1 No. tow fr. 3 47/ Jo o 1 1 4 ,#, L.$ i".400, fintietr 0110 C=3 I V. PHSKOON./ getONt NO. K-007-'77 7 i i. • y THE CITY OF RENTON 4 al 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • o LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- 0. p 4, JAMES L. MAGSTADT , 235 - 2593 gTFO SEP1, March 2 , 1977 TO: ' Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Jim Magstadt, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: MacPherson, Inc, Request for Rezone, R-007-77 The , appeal period has now expired for rezone request for MacPherson, Inc. , R-007-77, which was heard on February 8, 1977. Since the request for reconsideration or appeal has not been officially made, I am therefore requesting that you transmit this rezone to the City Attorney for the ;preparation of an ordinance to be placed on the Council °s next agenda for first reading. According to the action of the Council, approving, modifying, or rejecting the decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless within 20 calendar days within the date of action, an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, for purpose of review of the action taken. im Ma tadt Hearing Examine /r JM:mg Renton City Council 3/7/77 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all Council members, are considered routine and are enacted by one motion unless removed for separate consideration by Council action. MacPherson Rezone Land Use Hearing Examiner Magstadt submitted report and recommendation for approval/subject to conditions,of MacPherson's, Inc. rezone R-001-77 for property located at the Northeast corner of Monroe Ave. N.E. and N.E. 10th St. Applicant requested rezone from GS-1 (General Classifica- tion District) to R-1 (Single Family Residence) for 35,000 sq. ft. Hearing Examiner held public hearing 2/8/77 and appeal period expired 2/22/77. City Clerk recommendation: Referral to the Council 's Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance. (See later Ordinances) RAYS Agreement Letter from Finance Director requested authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute 1977 Renton Area Youth Services Agreement, CAG- 031-75 Addendum No. 2, funds in amount of $5,000 allocated in the 1977 Budget. Recommendation: Council approval . Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Delaurenti declared April 18, through 23, 1977 Quality Control as Quality Week in Renton and asked citizens to be aware of the quality,. Representative being present, Mayor Delaurenti presented proclamation. Bid Opening City Clerk Mead reported 3/3/77 bid opening for refuse collection, one bid received from General Disposal Corp., 1415 N.W. Ballard Way, Seattle, WA 98107, with one can picked up once per week - $2.95 per month and each additional can $1 .00. Refer to Public Services Committee. Travel Letter from Mayor Delaurenti recommended approval of Planning Director Ericksen's request for attendance at American Society of Planning Officials ' Conference in San Diego, April 23-28, 1977. Letter stated funds budgeted for 1977. Refer to Ways & Means Committee. CONSENT AGENDA (MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH COUNCIL CONCUR IN CONSENT AGENDA. ' APPROVAL MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL AMEND MOTION AND REMOVE THE FOLLOWING ITEM FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED, CARRIED. Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Brian D. Gain, 2017 Jones Pro tem Judge Circle S.E. , to serve as a pro tem judge in the Renton Municipal Court; term effective through' 12/31/77. Councilman Stredicke noted appointment of Mr. Gain to another city board was pending in Ways" & Means Committee, asking that more citizens participate in city government. Mayor Delaurenti advised pro tem judge appointment was for emergencies only, noting few attornies were attainable with available time. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL REFER APPOINTMENT TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ' Councilman Perry asked City Clerk to notify two absent committee members of conversation. Mayor Delaurenti noted willingness to appear before the committee. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Law and Justice Letter from Mayor Delaurenti submitted copy of Law and Justice Planning Planning Grant Office grant request of the City for 1978 in amount of $27,778, which Request must be approved by the King County LJPO by 4/1 and provides funds for purchase of mobile and portable multi-channel radios for the Valley Communications Center operations. The City's "local match" share of total project funds is 5% or $1 ,389. The letter requested Council auth- orization for Mayor and City Clerk to execute the grant request and forward to the King County Law and Justice Planning Office for approval . MOVED BY- PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REQUEST OF THE MAYOR. Upon inquiries by Council Members Stredicke and Thorpe, Mayor Delaurenti noted all cities are contributing to the Valley Communi- cations Center operation and that if the city would so decide,it can withdraw from that operation and retrieve city's share of equipment. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Delaurenti inquired whether Council would like review of Valley Communication Center operation. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 7, 1977 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 •P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the regular meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF GEORGE PERRY, Council President; BARBARA Y.. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. COUNCIL STREDICKE, PATRICIA SEYMOUR-THORPE. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, ' COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEN EARL CLYMER, WILLIAM J. GRANT AND KENNETH D. BRUCE. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS C. J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; G. M. SHELLAN, IN ATTENDANCE City Attorney; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; WILLIAM HENRY, Fire Dept. ; JAMES PHELAN, Police Dept. PRESS DON SMITH, Renton Record Chronicle; MARK PELLEGRINO, Renton Tribune. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL APPROVE, MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 28, 1977 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published L. I.D. 297 and.:mailed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to consider the Sanitary Sewers preliminary assessment roll in the amount of $531 ,900 covering cost Heather Downs of .installing sanitary sewer lines., trunk lines and appurtenances there to in the Heather Downs area located east of the city limits at Union Ave. N.E. and S.E. 136th St. and being in process of annexation to the city. Letters of1protest received prior to the hearing, were read from Mr. and Mrs. D. A. Bates, 13534 S.E. 140th P1 . ; Carolyn Dunham, Freeland, WA; Frances! G. Capponi , 13902 137th S.E. ; Elvin L. and Arletta L. Lindsley, 13528 S.E. 140th P1 . ; Mr. and Mrs. John J. Kalmbach, 13537 S. E. 140th P1 . ; and L. H. Taylor, 13924 137th S.E. , protested cost and questioned sewers through canyon. Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason reported as of 5:00 p.m. this date, protest letters received from area residents amounting to 3.04% of the total cost. Protests; to the LID were received at, the public hearing as follows: Donald and Sharleen Greenwalt, 13237 S.E. 138th; Francis T. and Barbara H. Hart, 13225, S.E. 138th St. ; Daniel T. and Diana L. Mork; Frances I. Taylor, 13557 S.E. 138th; Marion L. and Sheila Howell ,:. : 13551 S. E. 138th Pl . ;! Mr. and Mrs. H. D. Roberson, Jr. ; Marie Gunne; Steven D. and Connie L. Johnson, 13219 S.E. 138th P1 . ; JoyceMarnetz. Public Works ,Director Gonnason reported all protests received totalled 8: 12% 'protest. Gonnason explained the many meetings since July, . 197 5 concerning sewers and annexation of the area which are progressing concurrently. Gonnason used display map to point out area to be served immediately and area which could be served in future, pointing out the trunk line placement as planned and proposed placement if federal fund- ing could be obtained, which would be known before start of construc- tion; however explaining if additional funding were received, that the installation would be! delayed, that present plan is for installation during the summer of 1977, that if funding is received, maximum benefit would be $500 to each' property owner. Gonnason also explained the L. I.D. project assessment of $531 ,900 divided equally amoung the 19,7 . parcels; cost is $2,700 each. Upon Stredicke's inquiry, Public Works. Direc- tor Gonnason explained late-corner's charge could be arranged for antici- pated ,service area, if city participated in cost of trunk line installa- tion. Gonnason noted septic tank failure in the area. Upon inquiry Councilman Stredicke noted 4/4/77 public hearing re Heather Downs Annexa- tion. Persons present making inquiries : Sandy Webb, 13616 137th S.E. , inquired of, possible change in. plan or trunk placement, being advised that hear- ing would 'be scheduled if any change in plan. . Dan Mork, 138th S.E. , inquired re large property owner, being advised 1/3 of the 197 lots under ,two ownerships. MOVED. BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE'PUBLIC HEARING.' CARRIED. MOVED• BY STREDICKE, , SECONDED BY THORPE," COUNCIL INSTRUCT. THE .PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO PROCEED WITH THE L.I.D. AS SHOWN ANU THAT BREAKDOWN OF COST OF TRUNK_LINE_ SYSTEM AND NEIGHBOR- HOOD SERVICE SYSTEM BE MADE SO THAT ASSESSMENTS CAN BE ESTABLISHED AT FINAL HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, REFER MATTER TO WAYS & MANS COMMITTEE. FOR PROPER ORDINANCE. CARRIED. yo,1,1; dia . • Renton City Council 3/7/77 Page 4 Old Business Continued Horizons Councilman Stredicke reported Renton Horizons Committee meeting was Committee held wherein Robert Lester was named Chairman, Meeting Objectives - Lindsey Johnstone and 4th of July picnic - John and Becky Cleere. Stredicke explained the Renton Horizons Committee was encouraging community events and programs in the area similar to the Bicentennial program. Community Community Services Committee Chairwoman Seymour-Thorpe submitted com- Services mittee report announced receipt of proposed CATV Ordinance regulating Committee cable operations within the city as required by federal law and recom- CATV Ordinance mended that a public hearing be set for March 21 , on the proposed ordinance. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT AND SET DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 21 , 1977. CARRIED. CATV Agreement The Community Services Committee report recommended the administration be authorized to sign the agreement for renewal of the CATV contract for services, subject to approval by the City Attorney as to form, noting Seattle City approval has been given. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT. Upon request, Councilwoman Thorpe noted CATV Ordinance contains special senior citizen rate, which is only city in state which does according to Mr. Hurd, CATV Coordinator. MOTION CARRIED. Utility Tax MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL REFER THE SUBJECT OF for Cable TV INCREASED UTILITY TAX ON CABLE TV TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Earlington Area Councilwoman Seymour-Thorpe reminded the administration that meetings Park were pending regarding the proposed park in Earlington area, awaiting report from administration re existing building and purchase of property; also noting residents in the area were anxious to meet. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Thorpe inquired of the City Attorney re enforcement of industrial park regulations concerning unkept landscaping, being Landscaping advised of civil and criminal penalties, that restrictive covenants Industrial Park are enforced through Superior Court of King County. The -City Attorney further advised for noncompliance, notices be sent and if not observed, suit begun. Ripley Lane N. MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECONSIDER COUNCIL'S Comprehensive PREVIOUS ACTION REGARDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR RIPLEY LANE AREA. Plan CARRIED. City Attorney Shellan advised need for public hearing if Reconsideration any change in Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Moved by Shinpoch, Second 4/4/77 by Seymour-Thorpe, Council set date of public hearing for this matter on April 25, 1977. SUBSTITUTION MOTION BY THROPE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL HOLD PUBLIC HEARING ON RIPLEY LANE N. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APRIL 4, 1977. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Ways and Means Committee report was submitted by Acting Chairwoman Committee Report, Shinpoch recommending second and final readings of an ordinance rezoning Norwood Rezone certain property B-1 in the Kennydale area on N. 30th St. , known as the Norwood Rezone. Following readings, it was MOVED BY SHINPOCH? SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE PERRY, SHINPOCH, STREDICKE. ONE NO- THORPE. City Attorney Shellan advised the ordinance needs affirmative vote of four council members Ordinance Tabled for adoption (majority of quorum) , MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, for One Week SECONDED_BY PERRY, COUNCIL PLACE REZONE ORDINANCE ON TABLE FOR ONE WEEK FOR PURPOSE OF RECONSIDERATION. CARRIED. Ordinance #3114 , The Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final read- Spendiff Rezone ings of an ordinance rezoning certain property from S-1 to SR-1 located at 807 Union Ave. N.E. Following reading, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. (First reading 2/28/77) First Reading The Ways and Means",Committee report recommended first' reading of an MacPherson Rezon ordinance rezoning certain property to R-1 generally known as the Monroe NE/NE 1 MacPherson Rezone. Following reading, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, REFER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. 1 Renton City Council 3/7/77 Page 3 Correspondence and Current Business - Continued Lease for Letter from Mayor Delaurenti submitted current lease agreement with Sartori School the Renton School District covering the space used for senior citizens' recreation activities at Sartori School . The letter noted Parks and Recreation Director Gene Coulon recommended that the lease be renewed for another three years effective 7/1/77. The Mayor's letter concurred the recommendation and requested Council ' s authorization to proceed with the lease renewal . MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Harry G. Bostick, 3527 Shattuck S. , received Mayor's Proclamation for Quality Week. Monster Road Kay Johnson, 300 Rainier Ave. N. , inquired re Monster Road railroad RR X'' ing crossing, noting matter in the Public Services Committee. Council President Perry distributed copies of letter from the Mayor and Council President to Washington Utilities and Transportation Committee Commis- sioners Elmer Hundley, Frank Foley and Senator R. Bailey in Olympia re the crossing. The letter asked the Commission give attention to public safety and noted Monster Road is essential to efficient flow of traffic around Longacres and into Renton. Councilman Stredicke asked that request for signalization at that crossing be included and was advised by Public Works Director Gonnason of application made by city for lighting, signalization and gates for that crossing, having been advised by the PubliciWorks and Transportation Committee and confirmed by Council that crossing should not be closed. Stredicke noted Grady Way bridge inadequate; from load standpoint to handle increased traffic in the event of the closing and asked authorization to send letter to the Utilities Commission to include signalization and reopening of the hearing. Public Works Director Gonnason noted Hearing scheduled for 3/1,5/77. Mr. Johnson noted city will be required to do repair on the bridge, that it is a matter of shifting unsafe conditions from the Mons- ter Rd. crossing to Grady, Way by Totem Distributors, noting large trucks would have to swing into oncoming traffic in several different situations. Johnson noted railroad's refusal to participate . Stredicke_ _ suggested opening of access from the Metro plant to Grady Way. Discus- sion ensued of problem created for industrial firms for access. Moved by Shinpoch, seconded by Perry, Mayor and Council President be authori- zed to sign and to send letter to Utilities and Transportation Commis- sion. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, LETTER BE REDRAFTED TO INCLUDE SAFETY MEASURES AND PROPER SIGNALIZATION OF' CROSS- ING. MOTION CARRIED.; OLD BUSINESS BY COUNCIL Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted committee Development report explained that at the request of the Park Board and consultants Committee Report the committee met with them on 3/2/77 to review the master plan for development of the Lake Washington Beach Park Extension. The report Lake Washington recommended Council approval of the master plan for the Lake Washington Beach Park Beach Park Extension following review, recommending referral to the Extension Committee of the Whole meeting of April 12, for review and concurrence. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT AND THAT COUNCIL REFER MASTER PLAN REVIEW TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR 4/12/77 MEETING. CARRIED. Hearing Examiner Councilman Stredicke noted receipt of appeal of Hearing Examiner Appeal decesion regarding the McLaughlin rezone of property in Renton High- lands. Councilman Perry noted payment of $25 fee for appeal which was filed today. City Attorney Shellan noted that if applicant is not satisfied with decision of Hearing Examiner, applicant may request Examiner to review within 14 days or may direct appeal to Council in which case a $25 fee exists; the Council will then review record as prepared by Hearing Examiner. Upon further 'inquiry, Shellan noted the matter has not reached the Council as yet. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED Recess BY PERRY, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. The Council reces- sed at 9:30 p.m. and upon reconvening, the Roll was called. All Council members were present as previously shown: 'Perry, Shinpoch, Stredicke and Thorpe. 53 y1 i',''.; . . :;''' OFFTCE .'OF ',THE<•"LAND U5E HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF° RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION T0. THE .RENTOTJ CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT MacP'herson's , "Inc. . FILE NO. R-007-77 LOCATION: Northeast" corner of Monroe Avenue N.E. and 10th=:Street. SUMMARY OF` ;REQUEST "' Applicant requests " a. rezone from GS-1 (General Classification District) (residential 35,000 square, _fee't.) ' to R-1 (Single Family .Residence) SUMMARY OF . P;lanning, Department: Approval subject to RECOMMENDATION;: conditions . Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions PUBLIC HEARING After reviewing the Planning. Department report, examiniri available information on file with theg applcati on, 'and field checking the property and surro:unding ;area, the Examiner conducted a publi'c•:hearing on the subject rezone on rebr-uary ,8.,- 1977. APPEAL. PERIOD: The-',appeal period for this request expired on February 22., '1977, ` and: is subsequently being submitted to`"The City Council for final 'approval . I f you require aCdCdit oral information on' this .natter, please contact the officeof the LandUse Hearing Examiner. Y, ames Mags felt / 's , :°;` Hearin Exaxnin9 s sr< e JLM•mg " Attachment z i i _. ::. - a. • f°a[ C4- 1-1. s Si_ _7j•. - i 71.--i:. : Ii.--...-L1------.-'.:„..,..-.... 17 .i..,' -''',. •:::'-'---;::.:..e.-: •-• G—,.liO 0' '1.--..,::::* 1,-- .' -.- ' I'.',.•". "—. — ''' 4 Ii , . t. y toe , ItF i t 0.1,;:i-(,:ii ki•••••..t•ti: r_,, C:.L '.‘, R.,—. 3. . c.- i,i.,.r.• ,.• •.:..'...:.— p .,;, h GSA--.. P- t a l'''''' gY Nc., : 4-- 0.'''' '11 C..44E11. ... fiti'l s7700 •Lii ,, ,n r:• k ._..- ` -S ,-, R-3 1 „"'{ H ',"• d143 7 4 . .:. 4i.I.,44A..... :,1',....: . ... fur•-:-.T..-ki-r .t . '4.T ii\ t. i ' .i'' . 4 ''. i....:::"' : ,,, 4;. ‘`;:l -•, r t 1,'; R i : 1::,.: ,,_' J 1 1 :.;.1 i.. ','a%1. 1I y. :.: FI•r: .._-_,' J'`..I.. :. y j:l" y!,I : i I f•T,Z, C. 1 1 , 1 . , ,.. • :, . .. imai1-' 1'..'r'.1( L'::$::111i. ''' 1;'--...'''''''' ' %.:74: ,Iry -'..-,,: , ,.. , ., :'''' il''''1. 4 1-1-i-i 1:4/':::. :'; 't.:"'i'i REZONE: MAC PHERSON'S, INC; Appl , #R-007-77; Rezone from GS-1 to R-1; Property located at,N.E. 10th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. APPLICANT MacPhersan's. Inc. TOTAL AREA ± 3 .2 Acres 1PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 10th Street EXISTiNG ZONING GS-1 Single Family Residential EXISTING USE Vacant land PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Famil/_Residential COMMENTS EXHIBIT ;11 n „"" Q C 0 ® g C gt3c, QpDI ' Q a ov o a 0 D o Q 0C 0 0 IA Ps3-N 5AV Vt4WA-10 t r Ziz CI ip RI Q a o L 00da I Q e faClil MnV S 0 4 ' 7 Li C 1.3 trii.W.O.A.':.4;* lOrs\illri 0 i.liktio•N 0 i iO F 'a {• •• X. 0 11 Y}y:fyy}JyRl.N• .:}•.0 Z S 3 4Y}J•f IJ.•y'.I}:}p•};}.Y•`h •h z V 0 fit, h•:::.:•: :f•:.{••?lCl.....)al Ii, { 1,,,C.2. - a CL...... fjti: s Yr} iltY[fr{: aa Cfif.... r TN.•1AV % t iw# ONe. —i 1W 1J. iv..kn.?, 'Tic. q. GI c3 q Ch ±c En CD C] c3 Off] CI 0 CIO C)CO q oa.d1 a co 47 C30a rcr ccmcnaocDac e1-1 z 3r0cppci C c3 OAb a d 0 c 0 a13C C calf} d1N2N pF 41 •T,; ifpii. ?. k ;, THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 2 Cr, O 3 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co- o, P 0 JAMES L. MAGSTADT , 235 - 2593 TfO SEP1" March 2 , 1977 TO: 1 Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Jim Magstadt, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: MacPherson, Inc. Request for Rezone, R-007-77 Theappeal period has now expired for rezone request for MacPherson, Inc. , R-007-77, which was heard on February 8, 1977. Since the request for reconsideration or appeal has not been officially made, I am therefore requesting that you transmit this rezone to the City Attorney for the preparation of an ordinance to be placed on the Council 's next agenda for first reading. According to the action of the Council, approving, modifying, or rejecting the decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless within 20 calendar days within the date of action, an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, for purpose of review of the action taken. im iMa tadt Hearing Examiner JM:md 0 THE CITY OF R NTON cc) MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI y MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550o`) 4, SF February 9 , 1977 MacPherson ' s , Inc . 12733 Lake City Way N . E . Seattle , WA 98125 RE : RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION , TENTATIVE PLAT NO . 008-77 Dear Mr . MacPherson : The proposed tentative plat for Ruddell ' s 2nd Addition has been reviewed by the Planning Department and other necessary city departments . The subject tentative plat is approved with the following conditions : 1 . A minimum 15 foot natural buffer easement shall be provided along the north and west property lines and along that portion of the south property line west of the proposed cul -de-sac . This area shall be maintained in its natural state and shall preclude any access from the proposed lots onto adjacent streets . This should be added to the plat map together with the required setbacks for each lot . 2 .1 Access to the proposed lots 2- 13 shall be by the cul -de-sac only . 3 . The significant trees on the site shall be retained and included in the preliminary and final plat design as much as possible . Clearing shall not be permitted prior to approval of the preliminary plat , and then only that clearing needed for installation of roads and utilities . House design and building pad location should maximize compatibility with such existing trees . Attached for your information is a copy of the proposed plat with the corrections of the Planning Department and other city departments noted in red . You may apply for preliminary plat approval , when the rezone request is approved and final - ized by the City Council . MacPherson , Inc . February 9 , 1977 Page Two If you have any further questions , please contact this depart- ment . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director Michael L . Smith Associate Planner MLS : wr Attachments cc : Scott Bigbie , Triad Associates Highlands Church of Christ PROPOSED/FINAL ;CARAT I ON- OF SIGNIFICANCE' _N—SIGNtF-ICANCE Application No . TP-008-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-204-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal 14- lot single family residential subdivision . Proponent MacPherson ' s , Inc . Location of Proposal northeast corner of Monroe Ave . N . E . & N . E . 10th St . Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is madx is not , required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/ final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planning Di ect r Date February 9 , 1977 Signature 1' City of Renton Planning Department R007-77 Page Two The Examiner asked Mr. Bigbie if he concurred with Exhibit #1 . Mr. Bigbie responded that he concurred. In response to the. Examiner's question regarding the retention of the trees on the rezone property, Mr. Bigbie stated that there is a green belt easement on the western, southern and northern property lines included in the restrictive covenants of the plat. He indicated that the lots along the western portion of the property would be larger than the minimum 7200 square feet requirement because they are located in a cul-de-sac. The Examiner commented that because the property is heavily wooded, retention of the trees is an important aspect of the development. Mr. Smith reported that a 15 to 20-foot easement will be retained which would preclude access onto Monroe Avenue N.E. and a portion up to the cul-de-sac, and would serve a dual purpose to provide access onto the streets and retain the trees as well . Mr. Bigbie stated that the restrictions will assure that most of the vegetation will remain if the final plat is approved at a later date, and that the applicant was amenable to the request. The hearing on Item #R-007-77 was closed at 9 :20 a.m. by the Examiner. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, findings of fact, applicable policies and provisions and department recommendations in this matter, and being uncontested is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and is incorporated into this report by reference as is set forth in full herein. 2 . A final. Declaration of Non-Significance was approved by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official, on January 28, 1977. 3. The land use and zoning in the area is primarily single-family residential with the exception of several churches within one- quarter mile of the site. The request is compatible with the character of the area and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 4 . All public services are immediately available. 5. The previous history of potential rezoning of this property to zones other , than single-family residential has met with considerable objection from property owners in this area. 6 . Mr. Bigbie, representative for the applicant, stated that he concurred with the staff report and recommendation. CONCLUSIONS : 1. Ordinance No. 3071 , Section 4-3014 (b) , states that the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. 2 . The Land Use Report 1965 , Page 11, Residential,. states : The successful utilization of land for low density residential development will depend on the availability of easily accessible areas which are relatively free of recurring or potential hazards such as floods , slides , and land. subsidence. Residential districts should be free of manufacturing or commercial uses which would be detrimental to the community and its residents . The February 10 , 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: MacPherson 's, Inc. FILE NO. R-007-77 LOCATION: Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N.E. and N.E . 10tI Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from GS-1 (General Classification District) (residential 35 ,000 square feet) to R-1 (Single Family Residence) . SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to RECOMMENDATION: conditions . Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 8, 1977 , at 9 :00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report, including attached maps , was entered into the record by the Examiner as Exhibit #1 . Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Assssor' s Map. I Exhibit #3: Applicant's map, received January 11, 1977 , designating property to be rezoned with proposed use plan including general site dimensions and topography. Mr. Smith indicated that the proposed plat request will, be submitted if the zoning is approved, and has been prepared by Triad Associates, Inc. , a consulting firm. He also reportedthat during a previous rezone request for the subject property in 1975, neighbors in the area had indicated a desire for single-family residential zoning for the property. Mr. Smith reported that additional comments will beforthcomingfromcitydepartmentsandagenciesuponreceiptof preliminary and final plat requests for this property. The Examiner asked for additional comments from the Planning Department staff. There were no further comments. The Examiner requested comments from the representative for MacPherson' s , Inc. Responding was : Mr. Scott W. Bigbie c/o Triad Associates, Inc. 846-1.08th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, Washington 98004 R-007-77 Page Four Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071, Section 4-3015, request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before February 22, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may ' make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. 1 R-007-77 Page Three 2 . (continued) natural features and amenities that may exist or can be developed should belutilized to best advantage for the use and benefit of the community. Convenience to place of employment, shopping districts , schools , parks and other cultural activities 'should be inherent features of the location. " 3. The applicant has agreed to a green belt easement on the northern, southern andiwestern property lines . These' easements are to be included as restrictive covenants on a proposed plat. Maintenance of this buffer will provide a physical buffer between the proposed new development and Monroe Avenue N.E. , an adjacent arterial, and from encroaching residential development. This is one of the last remaining heavily wooded tracts available for development, and with proper planning and selective cutting could result in one of the more attractive developments in the area. 4 . The application is consistent with the goals, policies and location criteria for residential areas as stated in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Land Use Report. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested rezone subject to the conditions as stated in the Planning Department report to the Hearing Examiner as set forth in Exhibit #1, Section P: Recommend approval of the rezone request subject to the retention of the existing natural vegetation on the site until subdivision and development. At such time as much significant trees and vegetation as possible will be incorporated into the development plans . Possibly restrictive covenants should be provided to ensure retention of the significant trees, especially around the north, west and south perimeters of the site. " ORDERED THIS 10thday of February, 1977. 401 AeereeAresLiagstadt Land U " Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of February, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Les Porter, Sr, Scott W. Bigbie Kirman Taylor TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of February, 1977 , to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning (Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 8, 1977 PAGE TWO extending into site from N . E. 10th Street was vacated in 1974 , thereby eliminating access to the previously platted portion of the property (easterly 1/3 of site ) . A special permit to construct a church facility on the subject. site was denied by the City Council on December 15 , 1975 . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The westerly half of the subject site is relatively level . The easterly half gently slopes upward to the easterly property line (approximately six percent slope) . The overall slope of the site is approximately five percent . 2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material , 6 to 15 percent slopes (AMC ) . Runoff is medium, erosion hazard is moderate to severe , and permeability is very slow below a depth of 24 to 40 inches . This soil is suit- able for urban development. 3. Vegetation : The westerly half and along the north property line consists of significant stands of Douglas Fir, together with intermittent dogwood and thick ever- green underbrush . The easterly half of the site has been previously cleared and consists primarily of grasses , brush , and scrub deciduous trees . The existing stands of evergreen trees are primarily 6" - 18" caliper and provide a destinctive character to the site . 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals native to the area . 5 . Water: Surface water or streams are not apparent on the subject site . 6 . Land Use: A single family residence previously existed on the site. It has been demolished and the site remains undeveloped. The area surrounding the site on the east , west , and south is single family residential . The Bethlehem Lutheran Church exists directly to the north , with the Seventh Day Adventist Church located across Monroe Avenue N . E . and approximately 100 feet north of the subject site. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Land use and zoning in the area is primarily single family residential . However, several churches exist within one- fourth mile of the site . Refer to Section E . 6 . and Exhi - bits 1 and 2 for more detailed land use information . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.. Water and Sewer: A ten inch water main )exists along Monroe Avenue N. E . and a four inch water main exists along N . E . 10th Street. There are existing eight inch sewer and storm sewer mains located along Monroe Ave- nue N. E. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Depart- ment as per ordinance requirement . Any future subdivi - sion and development of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit route #42 provides service along N . E . 10th Street directly adjacent to the subject property. A PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY . REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 8 , 1977 APPLICANT: MacPHERSON ' S , INCORPORATED FILE NO. : #R-007-77 , REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-1 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from GS-1 (General Classifi - cation District) ( residential 35 ,000 square feet) to R-1 (Single Family Residence) . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : HIGHLANDS CHURCH OF CHRIST 2 . Applicant : MacPherson ' s , Inc. 3 . Location : Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N . E . and N . E . 10th Street . 4. Legal Description : Lots 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 and 10 of Mapes ' 1st Addition , as recorded in Volume 60 , Page 7 , together with the west 1/2 of the north 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 9 , Township 23 , Range 5 , less east 30 feet , less west 30 feet , and less the south 30 feet together with the street vacated by Ord . #2883 . 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 3 . 2 acres 6 . Access : The subject property fronts both Monroe Avenue N . E . and N . E . 10th Street . 7 . Existing Zone : GS-1 (GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT ) 8. Existing Zoning GS-1 (GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT ) , in Area : R-1 (RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY ) , and P-1 (PUBLIC USE ) 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The subject rezone to an R-1 single family residential classifi - cation is to permit future platting and development of single family residences on the site . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The easterly 1/3 ' of the subject site was part of Mapes ' 1st Addition filed in 1960 . A rezone request to the P-1 classifi - cation for construction of a Masonic Temple , and medical/dental. facility on the subject site was denied by the Planniing . Com- mission on April 26 , 1967 . That portion of Newport Avenue N . E . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER FEBB 1977 AM PM 718,9A11112,1,219,4,5,6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 8, . 1977 PAGE FOUR M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map is attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department 0. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The application is compatible with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the area . ' 2 . The application is also consistent with the goals , policies , and locational criteria for residential areas within the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Report, 1965 . 3 . The granting of the request will allow for subdivision and development of the site for single family residence purposes . Past rezone and development attempts to uses other than single family residential have met with considerable neighborhood concern and objection . Granting of the subject request will relieve that par- ticular concern , and therefore be in the neighborhood and general public interest. 4 . The site contains significant trees and vegetation . These should be retained as much as possible to preserve some of the natural character of the site . This should not only increase the aesthetic appeal of the site development , but also should .increase value of such a development . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the rezone request subject to the retention of the existing natural vegetation on the site until subdivision and development . At such time as much significant trees and vegetation as possible will be incorporated into the development plans . Possibly restrictive covenants should be provided to ensure reten- tion of the significant trees , especially around the north , west, and south perimeters of the site . Attachments PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 8, 1977 PAGE THREE 4. Schools : TheThe subject property is approximately one- half mile from Highlands Elementary School , approxi - mately three-fourths of a mile from Honeydew Elementary School , approximately one mile from McKnight Junior High School , and approximately two miles. from Hazen High School . 5 . Parks : The subject property is approximately one-fourth mile from Kiwanis Park and approximately one-half mile from Highlands Park. H. APPLICABLE ,SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-729; "G" General Classification District S-1 2 . 4-725 ; Amendments 3. 4-706; R-1 Residence Single Family I . ' APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, OR' OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: A • Land Use Report 1965 ,. page 11 , Residential'. "The s uccess.ful utilization of land for low density resi - dential development will depend on the availability of easily accessible areas which are relatively free of recurring or potential hazards such as' floods , slides , and land subsidence. Residential districts should be free of manufacturing or commercial uses which would be detrimental to the community and its residents . The natural features and amenities that may exist or can be developed should be utilized to best advantage for the use and benefit of the community, . ' Convenience to place of employment, shopping districts , schools , parks and other cultural activities should be inherent features of the location . " 2•. Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan Renton Urban Area , 196.5, . Page 4, 1 . The Neighborhood . . J. IMPACTS OF, NATURAL SYSTEM: ' Rezoning of the subject property will not have an impact on the natural systems in itself. However, eventual subdivi - sion and development off the site will remove soil and , vegetation, increase s1to'rm water runoff, and have an effect on' the traffic and noise levels in' the area . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request will have minimal direct social impacts'. It will , however, affirm the use of the site for single family residence purposes . This will tend to stabilize the uncertain situation pertaining to this site that has existed. for many years . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance- and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended RCW 43. 216 ) , a Declarlation of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal (see attached ) . This is based on the fact that the city through various approvals can work with the applicant to preserve as much significant trees on the site as possible . Ca1.:13824a0No 0 9 a, ov yie Ell Cl L1 ci -- n -J 1::0 0 c.:3 .... r7.171:9 D i': e O ®....,.ee CO Ng\U 0 it,A,,.,v a+iiws 1 m 4 5410 zos D 61 ri N 12 2 0 I0i 0 0 iii::Eltl..c.:-: a siva . 0,s3 t-, ri 0 E,,II Iiigi mi: iii::::,::,i ::,::ii 3. ti 0 = ugi.ifi2::11.tha4. 7::•••••-r ,V**:.**:....i11::Lit fall 3 il , I,.' 7 0 40001":„Iiro:t 1112 zlc00 -3 0 .-'- ,.., asti a49 11 0 00i 0 1. Qsg 0 z A 0 o 0 c..... _11....*iiiiigiliiigigm1121t:1 5 1 i E.) 4 u 3::::::::::::;;; .........wco° 0 El mosoo, i cl.„. [±1 hh,t,,w cinizin cDC3c0aE:3113._3GIi=3"-" ft'ft0...........g...... C 0nC Z j, , 4 j c D 0cm? ® c3 ® ® ® ony .* 4emot NAl ED cm Eal c3 0 pi . : Gfi rrl E:1 c° Ati n[2]1--;" co r:!)nio c2 1:3 rzl C27/23 co 0 - 1 1-1 o c723 '3tC 11 / / ...t- I eft- k1171 5- 02--' C ,- ese F s / fo"d' 1{. . _{ fe. h, ., a nE. .•Tfti u L_i_ • o .1 , 11yygl t Vii. , ° riT I l , n ' . G 11. Z .° I/ / yy 1 4.. •. h---`- j f I I "`, - { 11_1 a Ma,v a. A^ a . -1 1 t n ' 1 --1 f' '1M -4i • '1• 1 l';.., 11 r I__, • tOL „. 1 m< 1e r 1 I I ro, 214 209 i 4, 111% i . 1 y I. 1 C' nli AO i IAtilltisi i l I y o'.i fa „ Ne PlaMin 1 •• 7 231 228 213 210 i 1------ fir .I. 50 3. 114 2 SO ` 429 ','f 211 2 '° ,'.° i a., y.6 f 1 _ _1`s ',..a , 1 I f 1 r1'. lY/— © lig J'1' q l - "J /y7 4 is /i•-3 i I _ r' t '] _,w" E. ' 1 rn e II \1 .>' t oit ,, ..pl as [. Im. . I9r4bas, a 14S IlkI1711--i. I 1 , " s6 s f. l q(. I D o, ,i / / • 1 ,P , . i PI, ry` it 11,.} I• l. „ TD '. ti I -4 l n- 4113.{ t I1fi 5'» T•3_ .I 3' -•. M4 S 1 ry t 4 ..,......„; v, ..4„1. . • . , . .•,l IIC ‘CI a I I t 1H1 L 1 4 r. 't° +;+ • 4 -• o'..r'.4i a .• o._ , 1 , I•:•p.I.,l. .•.• ti Ir, N.E. 10 M ST.f 4-4' L{,.l:l.. ......: .N- A 'a , 1' t '• i 1t1 ,G, ...!. 4 sr"— f,' '•'.7,!.I, ,I P`.T. ' ' f rt , r> a •S a„... 33 32 +. • .1 f..-,4..•u' •1:1'1:LL11.11_ -- . • 0.1"'' . . , C.I .p 12l1 f1l Iu ..•. • -,7t_ 1 1'1 1 15 , O ,111. 1`tfl'I .l•TI'1f`, ' T T 'f 1 1fT. ,u., ..• f u O N :I R, 4,,,.1 • ' f, 1 , y.' - 1 C 1 n- iti 6u' ;• • Its i. 11:02 isi if V , . ..• isirI'.1.11. n. f.t,+ 5 i 1 y "'' i •1'1',ll ,?,],,'.'. •':{ iPI 17, f. v l N• I ;IQ/ sAs D ecw 1" 1'•1'''L .:11'-I'. 4 d 1. _ ._,Ix , , ,, J r ©elfir, iii., •,e -,YI I I _ F.:: ...{- • s 1 4. ti . 1 w: E.784 T REZONE : MAC PHERSON'S, INC; Appl . #R-007-77 ; Rezone from GS-1 to R-1 ; Property located at N . E . . 10th -Street and Monroe Avenue .N . E .- APPLICANT • MacPherson ' s .. Inc .TOTAL AREA + 3 . 2 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N . E. 10th' Street EXISTING ZONING GS-1 Single Family Residential EXISTING USE. Vacant land PROPOSED USE Single Fa•m-iiy Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN - Single Family Residential - COMMENTS EXHIBIT # 1 PROPOSED/FINAL :LARATION .OF SIGNIFICANCEd .._N—SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-007-77 0 PROPOSED Declarationf Environmental Checklist No . ECF-204-77 E:I FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Request for rezone from GS—a. to R-1 Proponent MacPherson' s, Inc. Location of Proposal Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N.E and 10th Ave. N.E. Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma• e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plannin• /sire , or J Date January 28 , 1977 Signature AIWAIrr.alMir City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 i-L-b oO-?J '0N 3NOZZ21 I N1 cNOc219N4 IVW all s liirony * D02-=„I 11v75 D / v U D (4c) o O o o o o o/Q obi .1.NLIDO • DODO Z Z- DQ 1 Eltea. .Z. o ci - $ dr01El z. 21.,5K os sWrIl f;:ACji tov:1 W tiff z. I- ca.Qr 16‘71* sNr f'Sid yhALSoyY" 90Y ,,IHvj 913Jri sh /f d ZSoth choth t»ir t•' 1°'- co« G7 C7QC313 1 N c= c CD © ca o c1 0 WI.! I— OO C Cl inI t wy4'01 1 , n Hy "N ii 13 cz © C= Ci r=1 cl r=3 co 1 r . ..• ..• 1.1WII /J 1 mod: rl tCHVE\ CITYOF RENTONREZONEAPPLICATION`',.., JANI1 1917 For Office' Use O.nl 92 APPL. NO. /f- p 7: 77 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIOIV 50 FEE; RECEIPT NO. /o/ 5 APPEAL FILED FILING DATE i - 77 CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE ORDINANCE NO . & DATE e e 77, 4 J%e 7/:5 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1. Name MacPherson' s, Inc. phone 364-9650 ' 2. Address 12733 Lake City Way NE, Seattle, WA 98125 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on NE 10th St. between Monroe. Ave. NE and Olympia Ave. NE 4 . Square footage or acreage of property Approximately 3. 2 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required,' attach separate sheet) S Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10 of Mapes ' s 1st Addition, together with the P5 ' W 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 , )ess c le ssA-10_f_eet—Kare the south 30 feet/f rr.ca id,-# .i'c-;at;ed s£ri es w S ee+ atate No , 6 . Existing zoning GS. l Zoning Requested R.1 NOTE TO. APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclass- ifyinq property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached .'to this sheet . (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in . duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. Single-family detached residential 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding `. area. See Environmental Check List. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Immediately upon approval of Final Plat - preliminary plat is being submitted concurrently with rezone application. 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. • 2-73 AFFIDAVIT I ,Les Porter (for Highland Church of Christ) being duly sworn, declare that I represent the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 1day Iof 1 P./ , 19 7Z , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at hee4i.r r I d mil A0N.4 N of Notar Pub is nature of Ownerlyg 7,z i 14- 0 era l3 0 • lE-ox 7 Address) Address) City) State) Ta.G f0lCo ) D.ZF 6570 elephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . OF R E/VT Date Received) t 0, 19. By: r . d U 111911JAB I- ter Renton Planning Dept . J 2-7-3- 76-135 c CITY OF RENTON/ WASHINGTON 13 .1 ' R• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM RECfl Eo02 JAN 1 1 .1977 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY L Application No. 4- 00T- 77 f T,r7 '!z" ,/. zoo-4; 77 -. DEj Environmental Checklist No. .G`e,4 -,76-/-,/y PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: O Declaration of Significance Declaration ,of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C, RCW.' requires " ' all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both, for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be . prepared for all' major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can wit `hthe information, presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are ,required, or.where • you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision',makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional!. pages if necessary. You, should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware',and which are rele- .. vant to thelanswers' you provide. Complete answers to these questions -now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental 'review with= out unnecesslary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal',' not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your, proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future'. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental ' review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no", and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I .. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent MacPherson' s, Inc. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 12733 Lake City Way, NE Seattle, WA 98125 364-9650 3. Date Checklist submitted 11 January 1977 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Ruddell' s 2nd Addition Na tureature and brief description of the proposal; (including but not limited to its , size, general design elements . and other',factors that ;will• give an, accurate understanding of its scope and nature) :. .;:',t' . . The proposal consis of the 'development;of 14 single family residential lots on approximately3. 2 acres• of vacant land. tip • s+':;• ' ' '.. '.: ; a i , 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as, the extent of the' land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The project site is located in an area of medium- to high- density single-family residential development. The level site is partially wooded with fir, hemlock, and alder. Ground cove on c n oom, tc. ; on the east half, primarily grass and alder scrub. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : August, 1977 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal . .. federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone (GS. l to R.l) , subdivision approval, and normal permits required of single-family subdivisions. 1 10. Do; you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity . related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: NO 1 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: NO 1 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed: regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic' substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES MAYBE N0 di) The destruction, covering or modification of any . unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , Xeitheronoroffthesite? YES MAYBE .NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the :! :', bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet orlake? Yam— AlAYBE N Explanation: (b & c) Minor grading for' streets` and building ' ` Sites may result in some moving Of soil or -niinimal changes in topography. 1 i I 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE ?a b) The creation of objectionable odors? X PET— MAYBE W c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature, . or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: __ 3) 'Water. Will the proposal result in: a), Changes, in currents ,, or the course of direction of , _ X1watermovements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBENO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or i • the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES M YBE NO ' c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water 1. body? X 1 YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration I. . . surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature', dissolved oxygen or turbidity? , YES, Ngg f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of '. ground waters? X 1 YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X__ YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through . direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, . phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, . 1 or other substances into the ground waters? X 1 Y •YES ' MAYBE NO 1 i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available'. for public water supplies? X YET— MAYBE ' WO-- Explanation: (b) Construction.__o_f_strpPi-s, rir-ivewayG, ' dwPllinr}s ',. and other impervious surfaces will reduce absorption rates to Some extent. --St accommo a e any additional runoff created. 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any j species of flora ( including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , 1 microflora and aquatic plants)? X 1 YES MAYBE NO INReductign of the numbers of any unique, rare or 1 Ij,,::fir, i I 1I 't{' `ri ij j r •i i i , , endahgered species of `Ifbra YES f NO 1 c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or ', ' . , • 1 in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing s pecies? X YET- MAYBE WU— d) Reduction in acreage' of any agricultural crop? r-, 1 l ES . M YBE Explanation: (a & c) Trees and groundcover will be removed within street R.O.W. ' s and on building pads: ,.Landscaping : of-i-n i-dual ltse maw--add- to both the diversity. and• quantity of on—site species. a- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE ' NO b) ; Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or Xendangeredspeciesoffauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X it YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES . MAYBE NO Explanation: No noise above levels existing in the surround— j g_i c hhorhnod ghrm 1 3 ha—generated. j 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or Xglare? YES MMA-YBE T Explanation: No light or glare above the levels of existing street lighting should be produced. 8) Land,' Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The current and planned land use trends in the area are for single—family development. 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : a) ; Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) ' Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 10) RisklIof Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES M YBE NO Explanation: 11 ) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- buti'on, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YET ' MAYBE 3 Explllanation:The proposed density; will be similar to existing dIacent development. 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation:The proposed development will add 14 new dwelling units to the existing housing stock. . 13) Tr,ansportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? ftS Wit- NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X YES -MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YET- MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X V S M YBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne , rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YET MAYBE NO Explanation: Approximately 105 one-way vehicle trips per day 24 hrs. ) will be added by the proposed project. The .existing street sys d1Cd C:dil adecuaLely awnuu ase without changing circulation patterns or adversely impacting the ' system. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or . re'su i in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES M YBE NO b) Police protection?X YES gAYITE NO • c) Schools?X YES MBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e,) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE Tf0 ExTI anati on: Increases in_existtng__faci 1 i ti es_o.r_ SPrvi CPS will not be necessary_ duetothe s _z_a_and-scalenf the prnposPd project. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a' need for new ' systems , or alterations to the following .utilities : a) Power or natural' gas? X Yam- MAYBE NO b') Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X H.YES MAYBE NO 6- d') Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO - e) Storm water drainage?X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : The proposal will require new on-site,-ht_i] ity lines and connections to existing mains. No other utilities improvements should be required. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding ' mental health)? YES MAYBE NU Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of ; any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the , proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: _- 19) Recreation. Will 'the proposal result in an- impact upon the " quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X_ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (see B. 14) 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an . alteration of a signiTf ant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? YE-§- MAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned , state that to the best of my knowledge' the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful c f. fulll dhisclosure on my part. Agent for Proponent: 7/6 s ned' Scott W. Bigbie name printed) . Triad Associates, Inc. City",of Renton Planning Department- , ' 5-76 , NO-1 ICI 01 MIN I (: III Illy I Id(i RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Al HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , W/ISIIINGTON , ON FEBRUARY 8 19 77 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER TII[L FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROM GS- 1 TO R- 1 ; file No . R-007-77 ; property located on N . E . 10th St. between Monroe Ave. N . E . and Olympia Ave . N . E . Legal description on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 8 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A . M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED January 30 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION 1 , Michael L . Smith HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF ME ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES • ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE: AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn f; to before ,me , a Notary Public , . on the iWIl day of SAAJ <rl19 SIGNED_ i '--f--/Uc,G '.,. ka_lbA) ' I INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO :H PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BUILDING DIVISION fr..-----tNGINEERING DIVISION vi TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITIES DIVISION FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM : :PLANNING DEPARTMENT tt(ICA40-- .SMi l-I Contact Person RE : 7 pi&- 144e-?f1 r,So.JfS /Aic . 4.. g—eej 77 L=Zoiu!: 'cam A j Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by 2i,1 '177 with your written recommeindation ./ Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 / r Date / /77 77 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department 11 Fire ,Department Library Department Park Department 8 Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. 1 1 FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : Action Name : Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Diepartment : ;SZ Comments : A. ... 4.0 41._.17-7/e-ad till _....... .7+73" i ---,/--'er-',07Z.?'--A ( il tr 7) Signatur Director or Authorized Representative Date 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : a t- ,= Comments : q/ f+ pecAre"i. 1 6-.f?a .I25 h? Signature of Ditor or Authorized Representative ate 6-76 OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY, :PARTMENTS : Department : t/ "?..c1 (.;:" A // t.:1 rf Comments : A cp ,75 1) 12 I1? 14„, 7/-67 77 "s/ Signature of Director or Authorized Repi.esentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Pr, ,eq Comments : r. I4', 1,, • L., Signature of Director or Au orized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date p F -1z1 ti v THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT OP QCO-235-2550 4rfto SFP'E January 21 , 1977 MacPherson ' s Inc . 12733 Lake City Way , N . E . Seattle , WA 98125 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR MacPHERSON'S INC. REZONE FILE R-007-77, GS-1 TO R-1 Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 18 , 1977 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for February 8, 1977 Representatives of th-e applicant are asked to be pre-sent . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director I By : Mi c ael . ,Smi t J Ass ciate Planner wr Renton City Council 3/7/77 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all Council members, are considered routine and are enacted by one motion unless removed for separate consideration by Council action. MacPherson Rezone Land Use Hearing Examiner Magstadt submitted report and recommendation for approval,subject to conditions,of MacPherson's, Inc. rezone R-001-77 for property located at the Northeast corner of Monroe Ave. N.E. and N.E. 10th St. Applicant requested rezone from GS-l (General Classifica- tion District) to R-1 (Single Family Residence) for 35,000 sq. ft. Hearing Examiner held public hearing 2/8/77 and appeal period expired 2/22/77. City Clerk recommendation: Referral to the Council 's Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance. (See later Ordinances) - RAYS Agreement Letter from Finance Director requested authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to execute 1977 Renton Area Youth Services Agreement, CAG- 031-75 Addendum No. 2, funds in amount of $5,000 allocated in the 1977 Budget. Recommendation: Council approval . Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Delaurenti declared April 18, through 23, 1977 Quality Control as Quality Week in Renton and asked citizens to be aware of the quality,. Representative being present, Mayor Delaurenti presented proclamation. Bid Opening City Clerk Mead reported 3/3/77 bid opening for refuse collection, one bid received from General Disposal Corp. , 1415 N.W. Ballard Way, Seattle, WA 98107, with one can picked up once per week - $2.95 per month and each additional can $1 .00. Refer to Public Services Committee. Travel Letter from Mayor Delaurenti recommended approval of Planning Director Ericksen's request for attendance at American Society of Planning Officials ' Conference in San Diego, April 23-28, 1977. Letter stated funds budgeted for 1977. Refer to Ways & Means Committee. CONSENT AGENDA MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH COUNCIL CONCUR IN CONSENT AGENDA. APPROVAL MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL AMEND MOTION AND REMOVE THE FOLLOWING ITEM FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. CARRIED, MOTION AS AMENDED, CARRIED. Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Brian D. Gain, 2017 Jones Pro tem Judge Circle S.E. , to serve as a pro tem judge in the Renton Municipal Court; term effective through. 12/31/77. . Councilman Stredicke noted appointment of Mr. Gain to another city board was pending in Ways" & Means Committee, asking that more citizens participate in city government. Mayor Delaurenti advised pro tem judge appointment was for emergencies only, noting few attornies were attainable with available time. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL REFER APPOINTMENT TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Councilman Perry asked City Clerk to notify two absent committee members of conversation. Mayor Delaurenti noted willingness to appear before the committee. MOTION CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Law and Justice Letter from Mayor Delaurenti submitted copy of Law and Justice Planning Planning Grant Office grant request of the City for 1978 in amount of $27,778, which Request must be approved by the King County LJPO by 4/1 and provides funds for purchase of mobile and portable multi-channel radios for the Valley Communications Center operations. The City's "local match" share of total project funds is 5% or $1 ,389. The letter requested Council auth- orization for Mayor and City Clerk to execute the grant request and forward to the King County Law and Justice Planning Office for approval . MOVED BY- PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN REQUEST OF THE MAYOR. Upon inquiries by Council Members Stredicke and Thorpe, Mayor Delaurenti noted all cities are contributing to the Valley Communi- cations Center operation and that if the city would so decide,it can withdraw from that operation and retrieve_ city's share of equipment. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Delaurenti inquired whether Council would like review of Valley Communication Center operation. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 7, 1977 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the regular meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF GEORGE PERRY, Council President; BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. COUNCIL STREDICKE, PATRICIA SEYMOUR-THORPE. MOVED BY •PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEN EARL CLYMER, WILLIAM J. GRANT AND KENNETH D. BRUCE. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS C. J. DELAURENTI', Mayor; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; G. M. SHELLAN, IN ATTENDANCE City Attorney; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; WILLIAM HENRY, Fire Dept. ; JAMES PHELAN, Police Dept. PRESS DON SMITH, Renton Record Chronicle; MARK PELLEGRINO, Renton Tribune. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL APPROVE, MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 28, 1977 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published L. I.D. 297 and: mailed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to consider the Sanitary Sewers preliminary assessment roll in -the amount of $531 ,900 covering cost Heather Downs of installing sanitary sewer lines., trunk lines and appurtenances there to in the Heather Downs area located east of the city limits at Union Ave. N. E. and S.E. 136th St. and being in process of annexation to the city. Letters of protest received prior to the hearing, were read from Mr. and Mrs. D. A. Bates, 13534 S.E. 140th P1 . ; Carolyn Dunham, Freeland, WA; Frances G. Capponi , 13902 137th S.E. ; Elvin L. and Arletta L. Lindsley, 13528 S.E. 140th P1 . ; Mr. and Mrs. John J. Kalmbach, 13537 S.E. 140th P1 . ; and L. H. Taylor, 13924 137th S.E. , protested cost and questioned sewers through canyon. Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason reported as 'of 5:00 p.m. this date, protest letters received from area residents amounting to 3.04% of the total cost. Protests to the LID were received at, the public hearing as follows: Donald and Sharleen Greenwalt, 13237 S.E. 138th; Francis T. and Barbara H. Hart, 13225, S.E. 138th St. ; Daniel T. and Diana L. Mork; Frances I. Taylor, 13557 S.E. 138th; Marion L. and Sheila Howell ,.. 13551 .S.E. .138th P1 . ; Mr. and Mrs. H. D. . Roberson, Jr. ; Marie Gunne; Steven D. 'and Connie L. Johnson, 13219 S.E. 138th P1 . ; JoyceMarnetz. Public Works Director Gonnason reported all protests received totalled 8. 12% protest. Gonnason explained the many meetings since July, 1975 concerning sewers and annexation of the area which are progressing concurrently. Gonnason used display map to point out area to be served immediately and area which could be served in future, pointing out the trunk line placement as planned and proposed placement if federal fund- ing could be obtained, which would be known before start of construc- tion; however explaining if additional funding were received, that the installation would be delayed, that present plan is for installation during the summer of 1977, that if funding is received, maximum benefit would be $500 to each property owner. Gonnason also explained the L. I .D. project assessment of $531 ,900 divided equally amoung the 19.7 . parcels; cost is $2,700 each. Upon Stredicke's inquiry, Public Works Direc- tor Gonnason explained late-comer's charge could be arranged for antici- pated ,service area, if city participated in cost of trunk line installa- tion. Gonnason noted septic tank failure in the area. Upon inquiry Councilman Stredicke noted 4/4/77 public hearing re Heather Downs Annexa- tion. Persons present making inquiries: Sandy Webb, 13616 137th S.E. , inquired of possible change in .plan or trunk placement, being advised that hear- ing would be scheduled if any change in plan. . Dan Mork, 138th S.E. , inquired re 'large property owner, being advised 1/3 of the 197 lots under .,two ownerships. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE 'PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE,- COUNCIL INSTRUCT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO PROCEED WITH THE L.I.D. AS SHOWN ANU THAT BREAKDOWN OF COST OF TRUNK_LINE SYSTEM AND NEIGHBOR- HOOD SERVICE SYSTEM BE MADE SO THAT ASSESSMENTS CAN BE ESTABLISHED AT FINAL HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, REFER MATTER TO WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER ORDINANCE. CARRIED.