No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-010I 10'7rVit,"1".- ,4,, • `:! , +:''.....3 , •'• "-- '. 4', - CITY OF RENTON PLAT APPLICATION k 9HORT PLAT c.. .,),, pECElikt '4,,x0 F IL: NREO c. ,D e,?/0:7,7, 771MAJORPLAT TENTATIVE 17 Jett is 1977 FEE $4960 el° -IL PRELIMINARY RECEIPT NO . 10?/Z, kG Driiii,i64 PUD NO. L__' APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : t 1...2 Plat Name & Location W side of 138th Ave. SE, between NE 20th St. NE 24th St. 2 ".-' No. Lots 14 Total Acreage 4 .79 Zoning Rezone to SR.1 3. 0wner Edward P. O'Brien Phone 523-4129 Address 9411 12th Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98115 A. Engineer Triad Associates, Inc. Phone 454-0711 Address 846 108th Ave. NE, Bellevue, WA 98004 5- Underground Utilities:Yes No Not Installed Telephone X Electric X Street Lights X Natural Gas X_ TV Cable X 6 . Sanitation & Water: 7 -City Water Li/ Sanitary Sewers 7 Water District No. 7 Dry Sewers 7 Septic Tanks Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance 8,, DATE REFERRED TO : ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH i TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY COUNTY PLANNING 4Y BD. PUBLIC' WORKS OTHER I STAFF ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED ,:? - -77 DENIED TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 10 .' PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 1 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE DATE ' BOND NO. & GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT i , Planning Dept . Rev 12/71 4,,,',1, ,I ' - •• , . 76-136 AFFIDAVIT Edwar& P. O'Brien, t being duly sworn, declare that I aill,, the owner of the property involved in this application and that the94 foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information Aierewith bubmitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of Illy; knowledge and belief. iSubscribed and sworn before me s this di-Pe day of 6 - ---elt-le --/C. , 19 7‘, Notary Public in and for the State of washington, ,residing a - Aielit --Y— fv,r • d ame of , Qtar Public) Sign ure of Owner) 1,'/g/e- -•,--s-ts- , 2 iv,--;.Th' -- •‘(\ .lii j,---: ' 0 az/5 , 9,0 ;,,, "3---- 9411 12th NE Address) Seattle, WA 98115 City) State) 523-4129 Telephone) FOR. OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certi e foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been f ncD o g/0 rough and complete in every particular and to conform to th 2.4[1 , lations of the Renton Planning Department I governing th 112 • uc . pplication . um 1: 07 Date Receive 19 By: e•4/ illiii/P 1\S Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 y CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON Q y ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR ONLY 1.. .. •. OFFICE USE n't Appl 'cat ion No. T .F ' _ .. ./. . Environmental Checklist No. , BOG: PROPOSED date FINAL date. ' i•. Declaration of Significance 17:1Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance i Declaration' of`Non-Significance ' -h COMMUII;S Introduction ;The State Environmental - Policy 'Act of •1971, Chapter'.43.?IC,` all-' state';arid local, governmental agencies to consider environmental !,:values own" actions:and when licensing private 'proposals. The Act also requires that pr2pae5ed;:,for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment The;purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether-,or not a i proposal is such ,a major action Please`answer the following questions as completely as you cari with the. information:, presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers' are' required, or4:Where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , your ex lanation in the spacepages y',p p provided, 'or use additional a es if necessary, You shoul.d :'. ' ,r ..;=55,k t•'::'. : include references to any reports or studies, of which you are aware and which are rele ;::; ` ' vent to 'the,.answersCompletequestionsp' you provide. answers to these . now will het, all ..';;';.•;,; :t;>:.',-,=' agencies 'involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with.' outout unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal ,' not just to' the license you are currently 'applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it 'is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. . This will al°'ow .all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental.' review, now,;i<with=.a., ti, out duplicating paperwork in the future. f,'" NOTE : This ,is a standard form being used by all state and local 'agencies in the,'State' •"{ ' 4:4;1" '' ` of Washington' for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to..,'`:'',;;;;;,,;,,;. your proposal'. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on 'to -the next question' 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. ,BACKGROUND I. Name of Proponent MacPherson's, Inc. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 12733 Lake City Way, NE b a Seattle, WA 98125 364-9650 prepared 17, 19773. Date Checklist JanuaryRa.,. 4' Agency requiringrin Checklist Cityof Renton Planning Department ,:„; :,:,'9 y q 9 4 ,r;:' 5. • Name of proposal , if applicable. r Farrell' s 1st Addition 6< Nature and brief description of the proposal ,,(including but ,not limited to size, general design elements , and other factors, that will give. an iaccurate,''" 1 . understanding of its scope and nature) The proposal consists of the development of 19 family residential lots on approximately 4. 8 ''acres''bf vacant land, y.: 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any, other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The project site is located in a developing area, with single family developments on the north and west. The site is vir— ttiial ly fla , has boon cl eared, a a. co ,- i ittle tion other than several firs atthe west end and grass/scrub ground cover. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : August, 1977 . 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone (G to SR.l) , subdivision approval, and normal permits required of single—family subdivisions. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with 'this proposal ? If yes , explain: No. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain: No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES MAYBE NU— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE A e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? Y S MAYBE N-0 f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES— MMAYBE ,N6— Explanation: (b & c) Minor grading for streets' and building sites may result in some moving of soil or minimal changes in topography. 3- 7 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X MAYBE WO-- c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or X regionally?YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in : a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES M VBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body?YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE X f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters?YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria ,X or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : b) Construction of streets, driveways, dwellings and other impervious surfaces will reduce absorption rates to some extent. Storm drainage facilities will accommodate any additional runoff rrroatPr3 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE t b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or X endangered species of flora? MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X DES MAYBE NO Explanation : _(a & c) Trees (if any) within street R.O.W. ' s will be removed and most ground cover (because of its low value) w-i-1-1--hre removed Landscaping of individual lots will add to both the diversity and quantity of on-site species. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , Xinsectsormicrofauna) . YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or Xendangeredspeciesoffauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement Xoffauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:NO noise above levels existing on 138th Ave. SE or the adjacent developments should be generated. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES MAYBE NB Explanation: No light or glare above the levels of existing street lighting should be produced. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE N Explanation: The current and planned land use trends in the area are for single-family development. 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MBE NO Explanation : 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) X in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:. 11 ) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri - bution, density, or growth rate of the human population Xofanarea? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The, proposed density will be similar to existing adjacent development. 4 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposed development will add 19 new dwelling units to the existing housing stock. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand X for new parking? YES WEE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NU- d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YE-S MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE 1 0 f) •Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES— MAYBE NO Explanation: Approximately 140 one—way vehicle trips per day 24 hrs. ) will be added by the proposal. The existing street changing circulation patterns or adversely impacting the system. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for -new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X MAYES YBE NO b) Police protection?X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES RATITE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES PIPTE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services?X___ • YES RAYFE NO Explanation:Increases in existing facilities or services will notbe necessary due to the size and scale of the proposed project. 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE N0 Explanation: 16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X YES M YBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 4 • ' f 6- d) Sewer EEELT EM=i=a E? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage?X YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : The proposal will require new on—site utility lines and connections to existing mains. No other utilities improvements should be required. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X TES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19), Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (see B.14) 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signiTf ant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Agent for Proponent: i)411, •(sign Scott W. 13,igbie name printed) Triad Associates, Inc. City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 R4 at. - - 0 THE CITY ®k+1 RH:NTON 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 ApeO SFP E February 9 , 1977 MacPherson ' s , Inc . 12733 Lake City Way N . E . Seattle , WA 98125 RE : RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION , TENTATIVE PLAT NO . 008-77 Dear Mr . MacPherson : The proposed tentative plat for Ruddell ' s 2nd Addition has been reviewed by the Planning Department and other necessary city departments . The subject tentative plat is approved with the following conditions : 1 . A minimum 15 foot natural buffer easement shall be provided along the north and west property lines and along that portion of the south property line west of the proposed cul -de-sac . This area shall be maintained in its natural state and shall preclude any access from the proposed lots onto adjacent streets . This should be added to the plat map together with the required setbacks for each lot . 2 . Access to the proposed lots 2- 13 shall be by the cul -de-sac only . 3 . The significant trees on the site shall be retained and included in the preliminary and final plat design as much as possible . Clearing shall not be permitted prior to approval of the preliminary plat , and then only that clearing needed for installation of roads and utilities . House design and building pad location should maximize compatibility with such existing trees . Attached for your information is a copy of the proposed plat with the corrections of the Planning Department and other city departments noted in red . You may apply for preliminary plat approval , when the rezone request is approved and final - ized by the City Council . MacPherson , Inc . February 9 , 1977 Pace Two If you have any further questions , please contact this depart- ment . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director Michael L . Smith Associate Planner MLS :wr Attachments cc : Scott Bigbie , Triad Associates Highlands Church of Christ PROPOSED/FI-N-AL ..- LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE _._IN—S-I-G-NI-FICANCE Application No . . TP-008-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-204-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal 14-lot single family residential subdivision . Proponent MacPherson ' s , Inc . Location of Proposal northeast corner of Monroe Ave . N . E . & N . E . 10th St . Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have . 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is 0is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Ti tl e Planning Dirtlecte/er Date February 9 , 1977 YYSignature o f I P,e n t o n f Planning Department PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 8, 1977 PAGE TWO extending into site from N. E . 10th Street was vacated in 1974 , thereby eliminating access to the previously platted portion of the. property (easterly 1/3 of site ) . A special permit to construct a church facility on the subject site was denied by the City Council on December 15 , 1975 . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The westerly half of the subject site is relatively level . The easterly half gently slopes upward to the easterly property line (approximately six percent slope) . The overall slope of the site is approximately five percent. 2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material , 6 to 15 percent slopes (AMC) . Runoff is medium, erosion hazard is moderate to severe , and permeability is very slow below a depth of 24 to 40 inches . This soil is suit- able for urban development. 3. Vegetation : The westerly half and along the north property line consists of significant stands of Douglas Fir, together with intermittent dogwood and thick ever- green underbrush . The easterly half of the site has been previously cleared and consists primarily of grasses , brush , and scrub deciduous trees . The existing stands of evergreen trees are primarily 6" - 18" caliper and provide a destinctive character to the site . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals native to the area. 5 . Water: Surface water or streams are not apparent on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : A single family residence previously existed on the site'. It has. been demolished and the site remains undeveloped. The area surrounding the site on the east , west, .and south is single family residential . The Bethlehem Lutheran Church exists directly to the north , with the Seventh Day Adventist Church located across Monroe Avenue N . E . and approximately 100 feet north of the subject site. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Land use and zoning in the area is primarily single family residential . However, several churches exist within one- fourth mile of the site . Refer to Section E . 6 . and Exhi - bits 1 and 2 for more detailed land use information . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A ten inch water main ,exists along Monroe Avenue N. E . and a four inch water main exists along N . E . 10th Street. There are existing eight inch sewer and storm sewer mains located along Monroe Ave- . , nue N. E. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Depart- ment as per ordinance requirement . Any future subdivi - sion and development of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit route #42 provides service along N . E . 10th Street directly adjacent to the subject property. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 8 , 1977 APPLICANT: MacPHERSON ' S , INCORPORATED FILE NO. : #R-007-77 , REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-1 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from GS-1 (General Classifi - cation District) (residential 35 ,000 square feet) to R-1 (Single Family Residence) . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : HIGHLANDS CHURCH OF CHRIST 2 . Applicant : MacPherson ' s , Inc. 3 . Location : Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N . E. and N . E . 10th Street . 4. Legal Description : Lots 6•, 7 , 8 , 9 and 10 of Mapes ' 1st Addition , as recorded in Volume 60 , Page 7 , together with the west 1/2 of the north 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 9 , Township 23 , Range 5 , less east 30 feet , less west 30 feet , and less the south 30 feet together with the street vacated by Ord . #2883 . 5. Size of Property: Approximately 3 . 2 acres 6 . Access : The subject property fronts both Monroe Avenue N . E . and N . E . 10th Street. 7 . Existing Zone : GS-1 (GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT ) 8. Existing Zoning GS-1 (GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT ) , in Area : R-1 RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY ) , and P-1 PUBLIC USE) 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential . 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or 'near the site as required by City Ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The subject rezone to an R-1 single family residential classifi - cation is to permit future platting and development of single family residences on the site . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The easterly 1/3 of the subject site was part of Mapes ' 1st Addition filed in 1960 . A rezone request to the P-1 classifi - cation for construction of a Masonic Temple , and medical/dental facility on the subject site was denied by the Planning COm- mission on April 26 , 1967 . That portion of Newport Avenue N . E . t, j ^ 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY. REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY 8, 1977 PAGE FOUR M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map is attached . N, AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department 0, DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The application is compatible with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the area. 2 . The application is also consistent with the goals , policies , and locational criteria for residential areas within the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Report , 1965 . 3 . The granting of the request will allow for subdivision and development of the site for single family residence purposes . Past rezone and development attempts to uses other than single family residential have met with considerable neighborhood concern and objection . Granting of the subject request will relieve that par- ticular concern , and therefore be in the neighborhood and general public interest . 4 . The site contains significant trees and vegetation . These should be retained as much as possible to preserve some of the natural character of the site . This should not only increase the aesthetic appeal of the site development , but also should increase value of such a development. P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the rezone request subject to the retention of the existing natural vegetation on the site until subdivision and development . At such time as much significant trees and vegetation as possible will be incorporated into the development plans . Possibly • restrictive covenants should be provided to ensure reten- tion of the significant trees , especially around the north , west, and south perimeters of the site . Attachments PLANNING DEPARTMENT, PREL-IMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF FEBRUARY •8, . 1977 PAGE THREE 4. Schools : The subject property is approximately ' one- half mile from Highlands Elementary School, approxi - mately three-fourths of a mile from Honeydew Elementary School , approximately one mile from McKnight Junior High School , and approximately two miles from .Hazen High. School . 5. Parks : The subject property is approximately one-fourth mile from Kiwanis Park and approximately one-half mile from Highlands Park. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-729; "G" General Classification District S- 1 2. 4-725; Amendments 3. 4-706; R-1 Residence Single Family I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Land Use Report 1965 , page 11 , Residential . "The successful utilization of land for low density resi - dential development will depend on the availability of easily accessible areas which ar.e relatively free of recurring or potential hazards such as floods , slides , and land subsidence. ' Residential districts should be free of, manufacturing or commercial uses which would be detrimental to the community and its residents . The natural features and amenities that may exist or can be developed should be utilized to best advantage for, the use and benefit of the community . Convenience . to place of employment, shopping districts , schools , parks and other cultural activities should be inherent features of the location . 2 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan Renton Urban Area , 1965 , Page 4, 1. - The Neighborhood: J. IMPACTS OF NATURAL SYSTEM: ' Rezoning of the subject property will not have an impact on the natural systems in. itself. ' However, eventual subdiv.i - sion and development of the site will remove soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on the traffic and noise levels in the area . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request will. have minimal direct social impacts . It will , however , affirm the use of the site for single family residence purposes . This will tend to stabilize the' uncertain situation pertaining to this site that has existed for many years . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: , Pursuant to the City of. Renton . Envi'ronmental .Ordi-nance' and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended RCW 4.3. 216) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal (see attached ) . 'This is based on the fact that the city through varioue approvals can work with the applicant to preserve as much significant trees on the site as possible . WIN '''. ,, 1jiri 0 0 12°740 E3 u 0,......._-0 CI1 [I 0 0 i!,::).4 -31 r7 LIa0 )47077-' 0 ‘it QUO D 0 I. n+ c3c3 0 0 OLZ3 tk 51 .a. lc% 4Z1 t 112 0 cm C3 I viawAla C3 00 (50 1 " 1 TN 111 1;30rnCrjiJfi) i icEl. is, 4 it n, al a3 CP 5 1 0 33riakirrefli "INI ZI:** M ‘g‘°ei: 0 0 4 AwatliN 04 c3 t i 5 3 0 I 0 LI Niii!i:;::::ilik•.Agi:iiii*K..iiiilEiii . stp iiii;,...v ti CIMt. ,....4.::gii:3'4% t a 0 4°4( -..: 040:?.: : :::::1:1,1:,!?:,t:,,,,„„,,,, Ire- I. n • 0 c.......,..••.................... 0 ty 0 I 13 la „..„..,C1 i 1 1 italintillas mE3r..,LI o atiow D c a 1-1-.1 Lj i 1_ •IN 'VAY 1 r .I- wy I_17', -11.4 rl el El C3 (12 C3 moo lin — ...1300§5 IN.111 --1 1W4Nv r;;;;;„ w totros , i, c:3 E3 o El 4--1 4 w• _LnEnEl--- 1ft1,13...3 al 1 ELI 0ypa (21 C2 Cl cit cm (73 la imi . k.1rN 'OAV :.%;•:!'4 470/40,1 ti Al 1=3 a 5fi c_j cl En- rzi c-.31.:Zif:=1 Co C;:l G3 C=7 11 IZ Czi c-i C=3 1=1 f2=11..1 xsi ri_ L-1 cf1 E3 c:3 I garq .• c]) Im En G3 CO CJ 0u 5.N tix OAV GINVIX21,1 r 1=3=1IiC2317:3 41"- 11iii7) :::'t i I • 1 21,..___• % 43.4_ 125`• 2 4 1I.1i e -...,,.......•1,• A t_ l..ra St' , 7_, 5{ •' F Lt r, + t _1, t SI , j Ae 100 I 9' '1'L' ' ,G1. oo •1 ti t ,_ { Z 1 / . 1. .• i 4 ZII3 .20C 4 V , ' 6 i'1Lf, V i t n 111 `` 11•• —,i IOL.• bT M1yarabi' •1 . ' ®li s. L t .. I e ,a l.l , ' 11 1 t1„j • ' I.A r l• D L14 20,10La' 'ii I, 1 I y -s rn1l+'VI rlf 2 L I L, ' , I . , wTM'. T. • • I) 1 1J a _ 1 I Nl.a• • 1Y M.G. 1 R. i 484 al. . .... . . 29 Ti, 211 M. ..„..,' r0 •. rill" i s . (.n ;. i a s....,.:, • , t e ..• .Ntil t t Q 2' 18 11 ta,.. 1 1 7 4 dui 7FT' I/ l.__..,_J /p er • T f ..— T,IT t•r iz1'in v l ' •1 - I o e , OfY s F.n,w 1. - la Act,,_b. © S aa. 1111DP`b III allIle i_ i i '..# N r n,v1_ In d irsio°!`1L1:pr 39 t 4 •w it , t 1 II N.E IITM N 7.8":I , _i--","‘• IF r::. 1. i. Illt.„!.. 171,/, .•••,,. ..'",r.fi ill ."-- :.+7,:1- ; :1;:.*:..:i' fi':1' :4. :...I:til:Piria . ' V,:• ' 2L--• 5 1 ,'*I ' r:- - ii,, Fik t.,,, t,,- .- 4,..... 4-,,,,, x.,4, „I„ .--I.. ' ... '- MINI ... ~. •\ % i•as 6 4 , 4-'2 • • • ,• , , Li- 1 \ .. 1' a 1' I 35` _ + o tiv 37 ®I' • ,f ' M r{ 11tst.tf , R r r'. Irk a z. t. 1,..; 11. -I_ ! LAM /L h.7 y •.I,, % y ., F ', • • 1 , 7. s •• , «'t. G ,oTM T. CCC( •"•I 41^ ti.• P yra, , 7 1; 1 1 ' •Ir o ti T. • to 1 Ali //' i!".: ." ' I • .,` s i1L 1 Y s 't i r+ .. G .,• a. ' 1 , q ,.. •{ I'- 1r-{ y I• 1 r .1. . {a o r n- it,c ! 33 32 tl n 4• i 1.J,L4!?Ll1,•n111'.21.L'r t . p ..I _,. fir-J do 1_. • t, ,I .•4I..a.y lt:: , n.M,,,tm.. . I . 11•A /NOW111 ff+i/f°A' t: ;"1to • =° !r'a t'' .4,. •`. =, • ' '. 40w 1l77 ''ice • ,•__ '{ . ...# i . TiYY e O ,., . 4. ,, i.. - 1- n .Imo' y i L•I•,•j!];L • i F.. Ai 1•`" s 1,: 7•4' • • 1'.:1'414'Lt`-1 t•1 'i 1 • I , I 4 ., U, I I t I I ! ., AY i4 ,• 9•' '' TN` . I i j AbbyL nib ,., ' k a : dir y...1_11'1,.1_ 1. d '4 t Q 1r71 1 , r s iii t ' 16'i I t. 1. -..1• . 'I T 1 1. 1 4. y '. 1 M fl.7n. v G7 t7 iA yf 4 "•'••- Igo,,> 29 r ;F+'i j • je .Ire ° . o , 1,• '^•i • 1 t . •1 d • ,. •• , f to 0,...1. A .; . • e /,• ;. , 1. 1 \ S (;,, :J , 1. REZONE: MAC PHERSON'S, INC; Appl . #R-007,77 ; Rezone from GS-1 to R-1 ; . Property located at N . E ° 10th Street and Monroe Avenue N + E . . APPLICANT MacPherson ' s . Inr _ TOTAL AREA .± 3 .2 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N . E. 10th Street EXISTING ZONING GS-1 Single Family Residential EXISTING USE Vacant land PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential COMMENTS • 4. EXHIBIT #1 PROPOSED/FINAL L...—LARAT I ON OF S I GN I F I CANOE/ ___1—S I,7N I F I CANC E Application No. R-007-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-204-77 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Request for rezone from GS-1 to R-1 Proponent _ MacPherson' s, Inc. Location of Proposal Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N.E and 10th Ave. N.E. Lead Agency :City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was male after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plannin ire or Date January 28, 1977 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 t IL-b00-21 *ON 1NOZ$21 NI CM09210ild 'NW i=i 010 .1-Wrn 1 4,.../ 0 1111 11 I I pp 1 (1..) 0 CJ 0 0 ,, 13 19 al .IN 0 D C100000 z I U 1•••••• t / / s „ 1•, 1 149 02 'Ir'N v 1 a UR fe 40,4,154 I A 11 tti 1 's CI 61 1. 1. Mei'ow Z 3;04 .......::0 3> I Cil 2EC CM rl• Z as ,* 1iiel: K:i:K:i:Ef§::::ifigi:::::ii:Ei:::::i$:::$!::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::::::;:;:4•1 ek• i wog V Wrip ,aF; i:1/4iii:giiiiiiiiii:::, Aii:".ilL, D Ifl i:E:iii:K:iii:::§k:§:§K:Kiigiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii?siii:viiiiiiiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii*K:gi:iiiiiiiiiiiiii:Wiiiiiiii:V; a. it3i:§:i:1:1:i:i::::4m t... .......x.:•:::::::::::::::::::::::§::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,4::::::-:::::::t::::::::::::::::::::::::::*::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•:::::::::K i......t 1 iSE::1:i:ESiSK:Kii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiiniiigiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii§:iiK:iiiiiiiii:iili:::::::iigiigi - 4 / i• 0 orts px.*:::::::::::::::::::xp:::::::::::•:::::::•:::::::•:::::::•:::: i Fri P.::::::::::::::::•:::•:•:::::::::•:::•:•:•:::•:::::::::i:::N:K:::::::§::*::::::::::i::::::::i:::::::ki*,11:*. syzi..h.s. -*:::::::::::::•:::•:::•:::::::::*:•:::x:::•:::4:x.x.:4•::::•:•::::*::::::•:•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:<•:•x•:•:•:: 5:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•5:•:•:•:•:•*:!:!:•:•:::•:•:•:•:•:•••55),:•::••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::::•::::::•:::::::::::•::::::::::- et. Iii ge c‘.. 1 1k M pgfh ?, Z 1 CD CI ED CI CI 1:=1 Ullwill ..A i i1 .D IN •0 ilia I-N ea 0 : t=3 C:=1 C:3 C.3 =I cli C:I CI C:3 0€1 II 101 II NM MI=IN is ass • us •us lit IO•N I II MO alI 10 0 ill . i C:3 C=1 CI Ci C=3 CI 0 • CS:k A fizt 111001 '1'05' 11 ' i• of,/ -1'N vi t3 1=1 11 va al INI 4.7jr •6. • ..••no• No• j.4‘411 Ai°17