No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-031fir 15.85 JAFECO TITLE !NS!'RANCE CO Pi,NY 0 of 1109 SECJ\D n lr' 11Ecv i, t-i 133 ,c? N 4, , r S EATTIE, WASHINGTON 9ffi01 G G`i 0' ON adI1,,i. a lit 1 9'S't '8'Z'I'ZI'II'OP6'8'2, o k`' r . .ON LLIEEIIIXR h sab• _ Rd WV 6 4 1161 6 Z i'W COOZr9• t• a so v° sc- « NOlN3 1 3O Jlli0 I/i)a n 3a zciLi: k, `e til i.• c dn ,, tia G3 5 J'v atl IA 6 r)t 1', c 4 0 j1• _ s••• Li• _ C c . 3 G.45 J i• 1 W ay 0 S 4cII' p A s Oh c so Cp 0 N.G a •• i I /' Ai•.: a 1)6) i S r,3„. j (i1 U 3,,.+ v te yam ° \F9 ` 1 R j60GO1vO50 i O 9 sA f O.J w < -== r\ NORTH BOUNDARY( s ,eo rH ST V 5_ieon .2197.4' S W. . 4 3 . D. 3.s'" sc I s so o . S. oy.- Y HENRY 3a QEiYY 7"bN D A M S o LL e.,T-y Q.O A! A T I 0 N 7—t • i P Sr .. r : s. i Ifcri a iR is fur, isi ArSitt at (,Q. b0 sO / MOTS oRD 1 i' r- C A I4t `',G > bo nct cn.Revisi3n th eof a 2v s "f Via- s,c=:cY. 1e ure Sovn.O 1 , oA Gna,.i. 11 4,.1 4.rt4 i*.s.. C W ; 1 c 3 P`' (, i I a 30 i- N 1 t i 06.nt % 3t 'M .Ileo " 3f, t. 4. 4 l 7.ac 3o pE, j N -+J 58 roG :;p r ro V i toy.? 1 la N I* h G air1 !p'0 - -- 1.-_' _-i0 -......_. ! 1 I 7/(77 (i' 2 20 t f VIM I 1 ' IL------------- 411 r y t.- cii C 1 [It e 11;1 : ,--.... - ::....-.....-:...:::::.:.:_.:,,,... ..-.:::,,... .i. . :.-::, 0,N VE 5- ati ID 1 Et) • Lie ‘A ;1rs i• Ems: 3 sso wA m ter! CO• ''" r °F y O. deft g uiL iA1 ciT 7cTNrO7F k i A i f INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : DATE : FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE : Ordinances and Resolutions We attach Res.olu:tion.,(s) and/or Ordinances (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee. L : r F : h1 'V Y q , F v 24 of A 5- 7 7 4 z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 biLLo- P CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER o,Q f‹ JAMES L. MAGSTADT , 235 - 2593 grED SEP-0. April 20 , 1977 TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: John Anderson Rezone, File No. R-031-77 The appeal period has now expired for rezone request for John Anderson, File No. R-031-77 , which was heard on March 29 , 1977. Since the request for reconsideration or appeal has not been officially made, I am therefore requesting that you transmit this rezone to the City Attorney for the preparation of an ordinance to be placed on the Council ' s next agenda for first reading. According to the action of the Council, approving, modifying, or rejecting the decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless within 20 calendar days within the date of action, an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, for purpose of review of the action taken. 71-1/ times L. Mstadt Hearing Examiner JLM:mg U o THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER JAMES L. MAGSTADT 235 - 2 593 gTFQ SEPItw April 20, 1977 Members , Renton City Council RE: File No. R-031-77 , Renton, Washington Anderson Dear Council Members : Pursuant to your request at the Council meeting of April 18 , 1977 , we are transmitting complete copies of the attached rezone request which was heard by the Examiner on March 29 , 1977 for your review prior to adoption of an ordinance. Due to high printing costs, this will be your final copy, and we request that you include it with your Council material for the meeting on April 25 , 1977 . If you desire additional information regarding the subject application, please contact the office of the Hearing Examiner. Sincerely, Mari lyn'Grant Hearing Adm. Asst. mg Attachment CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3134 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF,RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO MANUFACTURING PARK DISTRICT (M-P) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about March 3, 1977 which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about March 29, 1977, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Manufacturing Park District (M-P) as hereinbelow specified; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein Said property located approximately 120' north of S.W. 43rd between West Valley Highway and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission right-of- way) . 1- SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 9th day of May, 1977. Delores A. Mead,City 0lerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9th day of May, 1977. e56://214 /46)—ek-,;ACA-f4a;7-) Charle J. Delaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form ard M. S ellan,City Attorney Date of Publication: May 13, 1977 1 1 i EXHIBIT "A" 1, l 1 G airy L/M/T5 i M_p ii z 18eo' 3I A 3 a r . o OftmJ V. Set i • title a s'i ; d, fa S.W 3 RD US' STsus` U F . _....... ...............b.. .... .. t, A4.1 a I c" S lers r sr. la/sr sr. 4 1 FL ITi i 0 ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION SGt I'. too' THAT POR OF GOVT LOT 2 AND THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW A suweer srre1/4 OF SEC 36, TWP 23 NORTH, RNGE 4 EAST, W.M.,. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF WEST VALLEY ROAD AND WESTERLY OF PUGET SOUND. ELECTRIC RAILWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND LYING BETWEEN LINES 150 JOHN A10614300 FEET AND 480 FEET NORTH OF A LINE MEASURED AT uyoNi NO. X.•031-77RIGHTANGLESTHERETO, AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF HENRY ADAMS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 43; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN STATE HIGHWAY NO. SR 181. nA 1 v"' iµrA* 0 THE CITY OF RENTON a ' c MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O, Q at L. RICK REELER , 235-2593gTFoSEpcv' May 16 , 1977 Mr. Gary Volchok RE: File No. R-031-771600ParkPlace Seattle, WA 98101 Dear Mr. Volchok: This is to notify you that the above referenced request was approved at the meeting. of the Renton City CouncilofMay9, 1977, by Ordinance No. 3134. Sincerely, 1 - L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner LRB:mp cc: tanning Department City Clerk 1. 20 j c 10,41) cR .... 0 .3 ,_ Affidavit of Publication 4cY OF;RENTON; STATE OF WASHINGTON ss WASHIN,GT©N; ; COUNTY OF KING 9RDINANCE NQ..3134 1 AN ORDINANCE OF I THE CITY Ol ENTON, WASHINGTON, Betty Morris , CHANGING THE7ON- being first duly sworn on I NG CLASSIFICA'E,N she chief clerk OF CERTAIN PROP,, oath,deposes and says that is the of OFTIE WITHIN THE CITtio OF RENTON FROM •..• THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) GENERAL CLASSIFI- '. jtimesaweek.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and CATION DISTRICT (G) has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred TO MANUFACTURING f to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- PARK DISTRICT(M-P) paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, WHEREAS under Chapt- and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained er 7,Title IV(Building Regu- at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton lations) of Ordinance No. Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the 1628 known as the"Code of Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, General Ordinances of the Ord 3134 City of Renton," as Washington.That the annexed is a amended,and the maps and reports adopted in conjunc- t tion therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as i. General Classification Dis- as it was published in regular issues(and 1 I trict(G);and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period 1 WHEREAS a proper pet- itiori for change of zone one classification of'said proper- ty has been filed with the of consecutive issues,commencingtheon Planning Department on or 13th. May 77 about March 3, 1977 which petitionof19andendingthepetition was duly referred to . the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and 9 public hearing,and a public day of 19 both dates hearing having been held inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-thereon on or about March scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 29, 1977, and said matter I having been duly consi- dered by the Hearing Exa- charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $. 1 24, which miner and said zoning re- has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the quest. being in conformity first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent I.with the City's Compreheninsertion. sive Plan,as amended,and., J the City Council havingA.'4.. duly considered all matters relevant thereto,and all par- ties having been:heard ap-, Chief...C.1.erk earoppositinginsonuppt ortthereofor. ` n ihereto, NOW THEREFORE Subscribed and sworn to before me this....1.3 th day of THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1 HE`CITY OF RENTON, 1May77ASHINGTON, DO OR- ` 19 PAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I:The follow- ing described property in the . e City of Renton is hereby Notary Pu 'c n and for the State of W ington, rezoned to Manufacturing residing at Kent, g County. Park District (M-P) -as hereinbelow specified; the Planning Director is hereby Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June authorized and Bisected to 9th, 1955. change the maps of the' Zonnq_ Ordinanae..—as_1 Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 h el ` /-27 Renton City Council 5/9/77 Page 5 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee report submitted by Committee Chairman Committee Report Clymer, recommended second and final readings of an ordinance rezoning Ordinance #3134 certain property located 120' north of SW 43rd between W.Valley Hwy Anderson Rezone ' and Puget Sound transmission right-of-way, from general classification R-031-77 G) to manufacturing park (M-P) . Upon inquiries by Councilman Stredicke, Planning Director Ericksen used wall map to outline area and changes. Following readings, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE, KNOWN AS THE ANDERSON REZONE, AS READ, ROLL CALL: I6-AYE; NO-NO's. MOTION CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading of an CATV Ordinance ordinance establishing and defining terms, conditions, rates and duties for the construction, maintenance and operation of a system for tele- vision signal distribution within the City. Following reading it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of an ordinance Work Study appropriating funds for Work Study Program as recommended by the Plan- Program ping Department in amount of $3,200. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ordinance #3135 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended first, second and LID 298 final readings of an ordinance approving final assessment for LID #298 Confirming see earlier. hearing). Following first reading, MOVED BY STREDICKE, Assessment SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND PLACE THE. ORDINANCE ON SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings confirming assessments for sanitary sewer and appurtenances. in the East Valley area near SW 43rd St. , it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, ORDINANCE BE ADOPTED AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYES, NO-NO's. CARRIED. MEETING Noting intent of Executive Session for salary/wage negotiation pur. - CONTINUED poses, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CONTINUE MEETING TO THURSDAY, MAY 12, 1977, 8:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. Time: 10:55 p.m. e ores A. Mead Cit C erk1A. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Continued Meeting May 12 , 1977 Municipal Building Thursday,, 8: 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro tem George J. Perry led. the Pledge of Allegiance and called the continued meeting of the Renton City Council to order, meeting having been continued from Monday, ,May 9, 1977. ROLL CALL OF GEORGE PERRY, Council President; EARL CLYMER, KENNETH D. BRUCE, COUNCIL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. STREDICKE AND PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE. Councilman William J. Grant was absent. CITY OFFICIALS G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; DON CUSTER, Administrative Assistant; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; RON NELSON, Public Works Department/Building Division; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; SHARON GREEN, Personnel Director Executive Session Mayor Pro tem Perry explained purpose of continued meeting for executive session by Council members regarding land acquisition and special contract negotiations. Councilman Perry explained the Board of Adjustment would be using the Council Chambers for a public hearing during the executive session. Refuse Disposal Public Services Committee Chairman called a public meeting Public Meeting on May 23, 1977., in regard to the proposed garbage contract, 5/23/77 inviting public comment. AUDIENCE COMMENT Versie Vaupel inquired if any other business would be conducted following the Executive Session and was advised it was not anticipated. Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, UPON CONVENING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION, COUNCIL DISMISS THE RECORDING SECRETARY AND ASK THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TO RECORD CLOSING OF THE MEETING. CARRIED. . The Council went into executive session at 8:15 p.m. and reconvened at 11 :13 p.m. ROLL CALL: All members were present as previously shown. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Delaurenti having arrived at approximately 8:30 p.m. during the executive session, presided over the meeting. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 11 :15 p.m. 2. Delores A. Mead, Ci Clerk c`ir7 //2i.7 no/c•F ....4 a.2 4 e _a•f> t' 6 3/- 77 Affidavit of Publication y` ':.' y\` U z =r•-,STATE OF WASHINGTON S. ''• COUNTY OF KING ss. tti ry U, Be•tty••Mo•rris being first duly sworn on ING ' oath,deposes and says that..Ghe is the ..e.]li e•f-• clerk of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE,a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 17 Washington.Thattheannexedisa Pgb],i0 Hearingr-" ``NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USERenton...1.and..us.e HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON• A_ PUBLIC HEARINGasit THEnotinsupplementformofsaidnewspaper) onceubeeach isissue for a period RENTOin rular issues(and s..1411i1LL:13E N -LAND HELDY USE • HEARING' EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING of 0 A.s consecutive issues,commencing on the IN•THE COUNCIL CHAM- BERS,. CITY HALL, RE-.• NTON,WASHINGTON,ON18.tk1...day of !larch 19..77.. ...,and ending the MARCH 29, 1977;AT 9:00 A.M: TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROMdayof19bothdatesGS-1-AND S-1 TO R-2-inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- AND R-3;-Me No. R-028scribersduringallofsaidperiod. That the full amount of the fee 77; Property located on ed for the foregoing Monr'oeAve.N.E.betweenchargedggpublicationisthesumof $...2.1 v 9,6which i N.E._8th St.and N.E.4thhasbeenpaid-in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for-the- St -first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent 2. REZONE FROM Ginsertion.. TO M-P;file No.R-031-77; property located on West Valley Highway between-• S.W.43rd and S.W."41st. . 3.SITE APPROVAL 1N B-1' ZONE; file No. SA-032-77; Props located 18 t h between Shattuck Ave.S.Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of and Whitworth Ave.S.im- mediately-north of-Houser Way S.Mekr.ch 19...77. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS TO SAID PETITIONS C ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLICNotaryPublicin, nd for the State of Washi on, HEARING ON MARCH 29,residing at Kent, King nty. 1977 AT 9:00 A.M.TO EX- PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y.ERICKSEN Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June RENTON 9th, 1955. PLANNING DIRECTORPublishedInTheRentonWesternUnionTelegraphCo. rules for counting words and figures, Record-Chronicle March 18, 1977. R4247adoptedbythenewspapersoftheState. ye/L • t Renton City Council 4/25/77 Page 2 Public Hearing - Continued LID 300 Sewers MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CLOSE HEARING. CARRIED. Olympic View MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN ADJUSTED ASSESS- Continued MENT ROLL AS RECOMMENDED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. CARRIED. (Equalized roll 67,342.25). Motion by Thorpe that total amount of adjustment $8,000 be charged to Utility Fund, failed for lack of a second. Councilman Stredicke asked record to indicate his opposition to the LID, that it included a large majority of county property prior to annexation, that protest came from county portion which was eliminated thereby increasing costs. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR NECESSARY LEGISLATION. CARRIED. (8:30 p.m. ) CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all Council members, are considered routine and are enacted by one motion unless removed by Council action for separate consideration. Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Barbara Lansing to the Human Human Rights Rights and Affairs Commission for three year term replacing Clifford Commission Rost, who was appointed 4/4/7 and unable to accept appointment. Mrs. _ Lansing, 7271 S. 129th, Seattle, works with handicapped children. Appointment effective through 4/25/80. Refer to Ways and Means Commission. H.U.D. Fellowship Letter from Planning Director Ericksen requested transfer of H.U.D. Student Services Fellowship funds to the Planning Department Salary Account in amount of $2,050, having been authorized in the 1977 Budget. The letter ex- plained the University has advised reimbursement of 65% of the student's salary can be made semi-monthly; and further requested any monies re- imbursed from the University be credited to a revolving salary account, allowing the Department to utilize remaining HUD funds and provide for any deficiencies for student services for the balance of 1977. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later resolution adopted. ) Proclamations Mayor Delaurenti ' s Proclamation declared 4/24 - 30/77 as Volunteer Week. Mayor Delaurenti 's Proclamation declared 4/15 - 5/31/77 as Save Elec- tricity and Save Jobs, asking all citizens to curtail power consumption _ by 10% for the duration of the shortage. Anderson Rezone ' Letter from Hearing Examiner Magstadt recommended approval of rezone R-031-77 application from G to M-P manufacturing park, for applicant, John Anderson, R-031-77, to allow for development of the site which consists of approximately 120' north of SW 43rd between West Valley Hwy. and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission right-of-way. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Vouchers The Ways and Means Committee recommended Council approval for payment of Vouchers No. 13487 through No. 13679 in the amount of $286,568.88 having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or ser- vices have been received or rendered. The report recommended payment of LID #300 revenue warrant R-3 in amount of $5,810.96 and cash warrant C-3, $5,810.96. Council concurrence recommended. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Approval AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Proposed Motion Letter from Planning Director Ericksen presented proposed King County by King County -- Motion No. 7'7-237 which is enabling legislation to allow cities and Joint Spheres of counties to establish joint spheres of influence. The letter noted Interest some merit in establishing spheres of influence, noting possible resolv- ing of conflict as in the case of annexations such as the questions raised by Mr. Radovich in the Springbrook proposal . The letter noted concern that the city might be inadvertently committed to unforeseen improvements or obligations such as the extension of utilities without prior annexation to the city. The letter also noted P-I article that King County is taking a more significant role in regional control and is interested in becoming a dominant government in the overall area; the letter noting the proposed enabling legislation would not appear to have substantial effect one way or another on effectuating such elements. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER LETTER AND PROPOSED MOTION TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 25, 1977 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M.Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the regular meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President Pro tem; PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, KENNETH D. BRUCE, WILLIAM J. GRANT. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL PRESIDENT GEORGE J. PERRY. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS C. J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; DON CUSTER, Administrative Assistant; GARY KRUGER, Planning Department Rep. ; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; RICHARD GEISSLER, Acting Fire Chief; CAPT. BUFF, Police Representative. PRESS MARK PELLEGRINO, Renton Tribune; DON SMITH, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 1977 COUNCIL MEETING AS WRITTEN AND DISTRIBUTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted , published CATV Ordinance and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing . to consider the proposed cable television franchise ordinance, hearing Continued to continued from March 21 , 1977. MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, 5/9/77 COUNCIL CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING FOR TWO WEEKS IN ORDER TO COMPLETE REVIEW OF THE ORDINANCE. Community Services Committee Chairwoman Thorpe noted committee has been meeting weekly to review input for proposed ordinance, urging Council members to review, particularly systems expan- sion and rate structure. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, posted LID #300 Sewers and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing Olympic View continued from April 18, to consider Local Improvement District No. 390 Terrace sanitary sewer lines , trunk lines and appurtenances thereto in the Olympic View Addition south of S. 27th Street and east of Benson Rd.. Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason recommended final equaliza- tion of costs with City participation of Utility funds in amount of 4,500 and Current fund participation in amount of $3,500 for reduction from final assessment roll of $75,342.25, equalized assessment roll in amount of $67,342.25. The letter explained the $4,500 utility participa- tion represents a trunkage charge of approximately $.O1 per sq.ft. which will be recovered as a charge against other properties developing in the future and utilizing this sewer system. The amount of $3,500 rep- resents a reduction in the City' s charges for incidental expenses in connection with the LID, noting the City costs had increased $5,500 over the original estimate and that the equalized roll will be a 10. 19% increase on the properties included in the LID; that the City will be picking up 13. 08% of the total increased cost which was 23.27% over original estimate of $69,955.03. The letter further explained the LID was not charged a $.O1 per square foot system development charge as the LID was commenced prior to adoption of the City's ordinance requiring such payment, with net result that when unconnected areas connect to this system they will be charged the standard $.O1 per sq.ft. systems development charge plus the $.01 per sq.ft. share of the trunkage for this LID, or a total trunkage charge of $.02 per sq.ft. The Public Works Director' s letter recommended approval , that this represents a reasonable compromise on the part of the City. Persons present making comments: Marion Folino, 1305 S.27th St. , com- plained of location of sewer connection T, lack of contact with home- owners when ditching across driveways, and discourteous flagmen. Mayor Delaurenti asked the Public Works Director to contact the contractor regarding complaints. Councilman Stredicke inquired re standards estab- lished by the City for traffic flagmen; Councilwoman Thorpe inquired of City inspectors on projects and was advised by Public Works Director Gonnason of the inspectors duties, that the City taking over contractor's duties will increase cost of LID's and increase need for more City person- nel . Gonnason explained reductions in individual assessments, which ranged from $200 to $2,000 on the 24 parcels included in the project. Norman Anchors, 1523 S. 27th St., reported loose manhole cover as dang- erous , having received no response from Police Department. Howard Christopherson, 10644 SE 165th, reported satisfaction with LID. OF R Y .:, .1,a o THE• CITY OF "RENTON. U h Ji MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. :RENTON, WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ,MAYOR '• LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, O Q' JAMES L. MAGSTADT 235 - 2593 qlfO SEPStt April 20, 1977 Members , Renton City Council RE:. File No.. R-03177 , Renton, Washington Anderson Dear Council Members : Pursuant to your request at the .Council meeting. of April 18 , 1977 , we are transmitting complete copies of the attached rezone request which was heard ,by the Examiner on March.. 2.9 , 1977 'for your ,review prior to adoption of an ordinance. Due to high printing costs, this", will be '.your' final copy, and we request that you include it with yourCounci1 material for the meeting on:April' 2'5, 1977 .., If you desire additional information regarding the- Subject application, please contact" the office of the Hearing - Examiner. Sincerely, Marilyn,:Grant Hearing Adm. Asst. j mg Attachment 4' pF R I 7 7 _. v . o THE CITY ®F R:ENTON 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o . L CHARLES J. DELAURENTII , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, 0 1". JAMES L. MAGSTADT , 235 - 2 593 qTfD SEPS° April 20 , 1977 TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: John Anderson Rezone, File No. R-031-77 The appeal period has now expired for rezone request for John Anderson, File No. R-031-77 , which was heard on March 29 , 1977. Since the request, for reconsideration or appeal has not been officially made, I ' am therefore requesting that you transmit this' rezone to the City Attorney for the preparation of an ordinance to be placed on the Council ' s next agenda for firt: reading. According to the action of the Council, approving , modifying, or rejecting the decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless Within 20 calendar days within the date of action, an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, for purpose of . review of the action taken. ' lames L. Magstadt Hearing Examiner - JLM:mg r l.;.' I' ';tom .. F ' > April ,5', 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER" H. ' CITY OF RENTOPJ,,. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE:• RENTON,,.'CI.TY.„COUNc,I-L_. APPLICANT: John Anderson' FILE NO. 'R-031-77. - LOCATION: Approximately '12 0-' 'north' ,of' S,:W.. 4 3•rd between West Valley ,Highway-,;and 'Puget', Sound, •Power' and , . Light transmi'ssionsr,ight-of-way. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant request s',•a rezone from; 'to.M-P , , • manufacturing.:park;•,- to allow-` for ,development of the site :a -,,,Per manufactur'i'ng; park district ,' ,' requirement _ : ;L SUMMARY OF Planning Department;:` 'Recommend• 'approval. . RECOMMENDATION: • 'i.. Hearing Exam rL •ine ' k._..;:,; •.' Recommend' ''approval PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning''Depart'me'nt. 'staff' ',r•eport .was' received ' REPORT. by the Examin'er,,',On;>>Marcli 22;` ,1'r7 . PUBLIC..':HEARING. . Afterreviewing' 'th6•;PP.,l.:arin i.•'•rig- ,..De.partment';report, ',, examining a vailaljTe.> nform'at•ion :on 'file with the a lication, '-`and"',fiel'd• che'ck'in -the property and, surrounding 'a'r•,'ea', `t'he,TEx•aminer•:conducted a public hear.ing,';on' ,the'•_subject'-as: ,follows: r h. C• f 4;',. t, The hearing was opened on March-,29:,`, 19.7.7;,`a,at="11:!:'25-.ra, :m. in 'the Council::f,,%,- Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building.:7,4;:''• .r -" ` •, . Parties-.wishing to, testify.•were •sw'orn:",:'':, '`' l:•=" " '":-i; It was •reported 'that the Hearing••Ex amine! ,an'd' Mr Gary';Voaehok;: representing the:'applicant , had`.,re'ce.ived4and;`r'eview,edr„the rP'laniing' ; '' Department' report, and the ,report,-ywas entered'", nto::.t_he';re,cord`;-as Exhibit #1. I 4`•,,r. alp ,. I 4 . '.•' Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed;:Exh'i'bitY;:#.1: and;entered' s. :, the following additional exhibits into "•the, 'rec_ord• Exhibit #2 . Plot Plan Exhibit #3 ' Assessor' s• Map: The Examiner asked if Mr. Smith •had_''addi - onal- information Or .exhibitss > •"'- t; to present. Mr. Smith reported• he,',.had' present. ' The Examiner asked Mr. Volchok if .,he' .concurred':'in, 'E5ch bit .,#1': • Responding was . Mr. Gary Volchok 1' _ J I 16 Park Place' r j't5 Seattle , WA• 98'101. 5., ',,. . „f, 7 Mr. Volchok indicated his concurrence..:,. T.. inf. t;h&'r'r.e.por't;; and! had 'nO•,f.urther`•:fµ' • comments . , The Examiner asked Mr. Volchok if--he wa's.:•aware ',t_ h•at, while the' %:'• - application _is in conformance wit ph tti'e:, pm reheT}s' :•Lan't IJS.e-;;Phan:,.', r f 6 an-- M-P' zone requires, site plan approva-T; whi;ch.*mustc`,,be:;-s'ubmitted- :in:+.7-:',=:, '}1,t :' is(.!' .h.-.. R:-03'1—T7 Page Two a separate application to be 'reviewed.-by,...-theHearing;-Examiner: He also - questioned Mr. Volchok about ,the :drainage"•problems.' on the::'far eastern portion of the. property:. Mr' Volc,hok;:>repor.te.d:>'°that he was aware -that .site plans must. be:, approved' ,'rand that.`,dra'inage'•wtVoulbe _ ' accomplished by utilizing'' the- Burlingt`on;'N,orthe:rn.:might-of-.way:.=;r',.:' • • The Examiner noted that. access from:`:'the `pr.operty';,.,woul•d' utilize S .W•. '43rd Street which will be widened,:,i,n.,ithe':'ne.ar;''future'.,and :'is a heavily traveled. street, and .asked Mr: Vo'1`chok: if he' had: considered alternative access points from, the.;property;: Mr'.' ;Smi.th '', nd ca`ted ' thatS.W. . 43rd Street is a secondary,,'.acce's,s:::'with 'the,,'Wes.t`:Valley. Highway being, the major access. road:`;:':f:or. the':propert'y; -but;:de.tailed development plans had not. been,::drawn•::'.:ti`::Mr: ,%Vo°lc'hok,'.r.epor•teid': that a': two-way left turn 'access is. b:e ng, de:`s'i'gned:'"on ?the:`:n'ortYJ;: boundary of 'the property in coordination wit'h;='the• :Tr:uckweld,t'facil'ity. The Examiner inquired about the exist" n r:a`de 'on theq Smith reported that the site.' b'e f i ll:e tual l anPd";,even. y-;:. d':aYi; •s:• , process .would .change the elevation that'Mr Volchok a_ f it l' J permit Division at that 'ti'me:.. r';,':::' ' i. i f 1• t'1't.',_ iJL :., 7;'i:. iL.. :fit., The Examiner uestioned Mr. Vo'lchok'i•q on:;'m a'tters-:'.:re''lat n.cj 'to• z ori :°'n g f gdes nations 'of surroundin r,o: ert` s•'' i'g P. P e' .;F,';`wh-o<:' n'dic,ated: .t'h•a•t',h;e:;=" anti:ci acted that • businesses now" loc;at.ed''o 3rdPr;-S;:W:'...4 r :S.tr;ee.t:''wo'ul'd• ventuall' corr'es pond .wi'th' the .Com rehensi v:e :Land:'. .s'r.Y+ P. P: Ta;rr:.. ::The Examiner expressed. concern about 'these. ro ''erti:es' ma ny 'inin a':: 1' and l,' iA S"'L yF:'i• '.Pf'i• ,,.t'...I I'i'. •I j',addresse•d-'durin• laneg • '•P P. Uf -_ .':ti+'. Thee Eherexame" asrir 'a ed 'i f 't were furt"h er `co' '•e`n't's 'e" li' q ,tfi ,h eari on m #R 0oame;.b' the=iEx`a Fine {, 1 • CON LUSION$ i•n ,this- matter the.;Examiner .no.w ;makes;and` enters^;;th'e';fo'llowi"n yu,r: r;. ,:.i: 'oi t''s•r.:''.,(,'C;i'',,.., r.':•7:' T.i t}., 4 f t 4M1'y; t 4..:..F IN F Y 4I'ND GS r.•9(i;;n4 r;i;, h•i,i" I 4.•1S. fwn1f .M hn Anderson o of.' thsen_ e.d'<broYt 7 fihiar- olclio "who a' o s•':be 'hf,. r=• i. k' i 1••2. 'Mr- :Volcho ind Gated that'he:Yi`a s revi ewe Ythe•: PST t ' ri ii De r' ent: ort"A-staff' re P and •concurs to rezone• the 6. 9 acre arcel% `f' pro pe' 'fPop ,p- rt;y`;, rom G-'_to Man•uf'acturIn'Park. The' a licaf 'oii:<'re` .ues't°' %con cur's"'.w 'tH:°'.t he'> nsi e UsComretievLand ' e P1=an •' The', ro was..:.. os.ted .and ;.tYiere'" was i'o' a aren ositi `n •e he` 'i• `e r-'; fi;r: i."•'-+ r:1F;. o t .. i:`. r`;w_'r ,tt ,,ri . ,•r -pJ k ri,'.,'.:•=-.:;.P property s one:`ofthe last s- f . ave -riot:''•be z ;e;P: Ya Yg• ri t MnYF rrr. f.:lication, .'.e, u s ee's'•'i i. h:"': Y e's '"G` "e R' ver:-`v '11rgt` 'agr t, „the: ,7a't t','. ,r!e ri,; f a '''fi'+::..;;•:,;..: p.ari' m t' h:>:;wa ,,ad._.Prt d•,: y,:,a. Y:..•• r'=i ly!June' 0, 9'76 Jf• 1 L I F:'•(i 4. Pursuant. to the Cityof Renton, Envir`onmenit'al•.`Or:d nance°;and .the . State Environmental E i kse es ons'ib 'e- 'bl: '°c-.:o> f .c--'"al Yia" s'sied' 1 a'.•.` rn'° "-';:: c;lar;at o :o;Non 5 fcan e f,or:,:f::t u ,o,- o o,. t, u 77: a-l:'develo menr't'.=.of .-t e, . t'e': . , ,;re'=;u'ir'e: .f.u'ra he`;':' F i:''rev' ew • to• Ni r` ''Vol ch ok;.,th'a t ;th'e; r',e zmner 'stoted onl The'•first 'art of `a- two' ste' •roce'ss' 'in~ri r•de-r;'•to ev. o;' th Tr. next'i== s`- e' i' s•i l n:e"sub ect property-. he pr.oc e s: w '1'h,v r ;ii .re, .a-'•", te,p.. a a royal- b .the Hearin Ex410.ri r The`:;Ex''ani rier:':'also:.'no.ted problems ;relati ng to dra na' e,several acce's's'..'and .'.futu'r'e,,' r.adesP The ,Examiner also 'informed Mr: be';=re .uired by, the Build n D ,vis:i• on= :at'"tithe:'.time;-"o'f bui'ld'inqg. "/•.f.i g.. e ir licari:.i.m t' .'a PP. i7 `tCI.. Y., f: u, n.•. ..,i:•• ,,.'•., .,,,.f V',;C':Y 1 : 'ti-t':r,h. - l`". J• A y'.iriJrfir'. 1:.a'iJ;y.'J f R-031'=.77' Page` Three 6. The Planning ' Department report accur:ately ,sets..'forth, ''.the issues findings of fact, ..applicable policies arid; prov'ision.., -,d .''` , ' departmental recommendations'. in ,this":matter grid . this : repo'r.t;-itself being" uncontested, is hereby atta;che,d_i=-as' Exhibit #l, and i'ncorporated;., in, this report by reference as fort'h':; n full herein ', CONCLU M1, i: S,IONS. 1 Theaapplicati on 're uest 'is' .'a 'ar.ei.-I.q pp un'cont'esed. -%i `iconfJ•:ormance with' het `Com reherisve L'a`p n'dr Us`e:':P.l:a'ri;,',:=;:. 2::;: r;, 2 It is a arent n. re_ pp viewn ,the:;,om• re.hens <ve .'Larid:f' i' s''g`, P_ r,,, LJ e:':Paan'':'and the existin ,zonin that, the `regg' nest:s> 's:''in, 'com '1::,'`' : existing 'and"future .devel'o 'ment ;;of-::manufa'cturi !..,.'"• P u. ri'gr ;usEs•;iii-;..tH,is! area. The •applicant ' s r.epresen:tative;,;w,as 'aware'':'o'f 'otent;ial'-` 1' ' do-site' m rovemeP nts .that would 'be .xe' u • •e P, y ,. k r ,d;;to`,' be addressed• ,. :' n t,, the .t'ime :of si te. lan' r fin.R EC OMME AT ION. r E' JAI'. '• J., Reco'' Recommend,.a' royal spp ub ect to "the De'P l,a`nni'rig;;, par_tment`':=l=recommerid atioris ORD E'R D 4"E Tr',i': H I 5th f'`d'a A rl'Y 7,'P 67.s,: ". • Ji s•` :L.t'/ad.t:'IA'yl,' - 3 1E an Sd,..,'U E am rie ' t, r'• E 7. n t C^T RANSM •T f.I TED''- T.H IS 5'.th da ;of"•:P, t'h'e' P ' y'' f .ed., mail;-;to r' '1at e s ly,,,P,0 f eeor d l,' r7 11 ar, of t r:%:ff TI2A 1NNIISTZ' DE J:. TH'IS`da o f:' A t.,g p is'" a or harle 's l t Co nu ci'1 Pr:e s i f'.d"`ri;:e Gt ear,',e'o'r` J ;'P''r'r": Coun pry. ;>, E ci lman-"R' c - h rd,'M: StredekeQ'. .. Warre n" :C. '.Lorin. s r:`Y`•':a, on',7 1Piiblr 'Works: ;D, rector G ord on' .r fck'sen "P a ri r'r .D e;`r c-to' r'D o ri J S i.m tli•e t on. Reco rd-Chroni cle' P urs uan t 'tb Ordin ance N r.,,o. 3071 e` S ca oria '4'' 3 0'1'5;;: `:re `u'esa:'°'for::;.,,` reconside ration or notice of. f'a ea^l',,:musf:'':b'e .'f,i`le ti;.PP el`s:'in' iar'i t''in; ',o'n. o'r before Ap ri'l•'12 , 1,977 An g` P y aggriev..e;d''`p,er son:;.':fee lrn • that ;the decision:< of the Examiner is based :on:''erron'eons7,-procedure`s`,;i`, errorsoflaworfact, -error.: in judgment;',,:;or the'.'',d'ic,o,ver :}:o'f `new'' e.vid'ence< which. could not 'be reasonably;"available. at 't'Ye;:.' r' or. `hearn a make. a 'written request' for review'°by''-th'e. 'Ex_ ;airliner: within` fourteen .` 14) .days.:of the. conclusion of :the he;a i sre ue`:,` s1ia,, , y,,,,:,, i;,,;;,: z.,;,4,r.. g<: :..:';'Th' : .q 1'.set forth the specific errors "relied<: upp•'on 'b'`• ':suc yPY°' uch ;appell:a;nt'' a'na? ,th.;, Examiner may,' after review. of the `."rec'ord, t`ake':`.fu'rther:':act; on::.as 'he deems proper. I;r„ c:d• Y. i pit: .•a Jr: fFtV 1[i K/,rY A', T eta r• t:ti;i. INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Del Mead, City Clerk DATE: March 7 , 1977 FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance re Amendment to Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Ripley Lane Dear Del: Enclosed herewith is the original of a proposed Ordinance re the above captioned matter which we have re-written to cur with the findings of the Planning Commission. Please attached Exhibit "A"/ Lier4 GMS :nd Ee rrd M.Shellan Encl. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE May 9, 1977 The Ways and Means Committee recommends second and final reading of an ordinance rezoning certain property located near SW 43rd Street and West Valley Highway, known as the Anderson rezone, .rezoni,ng from G to _MP. The Ways and Means Committee recommends first reading of the .following:. 1 . The Cable Television Ordinance. 2. An Ordinance appropriating funds for Work Study .Program. The Ways and Means Committee recommends first, second and final readings of an Ordinance approving final assessessment='for" 'LID..#2'98.`(if. approved at earlier public hearing) . Earl Clymer William Grant r. Barbara Shinpoch I r i-_0.I a , /44"4. 6.'+4.4. a 8 . 0 11 1 a • 1 ` • 1 - l - prI101.-Sold NQ M77ri4 0 t. 1 O jowl/ . . ' 1 X7vet' i3M®d Q 4 AVM It st iii 414 z i, ti- v. fi «e . u v z a o 0 1.'1 i, miti A;r7 A 1 t/soi Al .' I g 0 4 d is -4-: s Ime aryl H Z 8 isIiXICZ' ! HH M gal X 6 ! A-1 4 1 r 0 Y 1 vi, _ ..,---------4---_, Renton City Council 4/25/77 Page 2 Public Hearing - Continued LID 300 Sewers MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CLOSE HEARING. CARRIED. Olympic View MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN ADJUSTED ASSESS- Continued MENT ROLL AS RECOMMENDED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. CARRIED. (Equalized roll 67,342.25). Motion by Thorpe that total amount of adjustment $8,000 be charged to Utility Fund, failed for lack of a second. Councilman Stredicke asked record to indicate his opposition to the LID, that it included a large majority of county property prior to annexation, that protest came from county portion which was eliminated thereby increasing costs. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR NECESSARY LEGISLATION. CARRIED. (8:30 p.m. ) CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all Council members, are considered routine and are enacted by one motion unless removed by Council action for separate consideration. Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Barbara Lansing to the Human Human Rights Rights and Affairs Commission for three year term replacing Clifford Commission Rost, who was appointed 4/4/7 and unable to accept appointment. Mrs. _ Lansing, 7271 S. 129th, Seattle, works with handicapped children. Appointment effective through 4/25/80. Refer to Ways and Means Commission. H.U.D. Fellowship Letter from Planning Director Ericksen requested transfer of H.U.D. Student Services Fellowship funds to the Planning Department Salary Account in amount of $2,050, having been authorized in the 1977 Budget. The letter ex- plained the University has advised reimbursement of 65% of the student's salary can be made semi-monthly; and further requested any monies re- imbursed from the University be credited to a revolving salary account, allowing the Department to utilize remaining HUD funds and provide for any deficiencies for student services for the balance of 1977. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later resolution adopted. ) Proclamations Mayor Delaurenti ' s Proclamation declared 4/24 - 30/77 as Volunteer Week. Mayor Delaurenti 's Proclamation declared 4/15 - 5/31/77 as Save Elec- tricity and Save Jobs, asking all citizens to curtail power consumption by 10% for the duration of the shortage. Anderson Rezone Letter from Hearing Examiner Magstadt recommended approval of rezone R-031-77 application from G to M-P manufacturing park, for applicant, John 1 Anderson, R-031-77, to allow for development of the site which consists of approximately 120' north of SW 43rd between West Valley Hwy. and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission right-of-way. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Vouchers The Ways and Means Committee recommended Council approval for payment of Vouchers No. 13487 through No. 13679 in the amount of $286,568.88 having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or ser- vices have been received or rendered. The report recommended payment of LID #300 revenue warrant R-3 in amount of $5,810.96 and cash warrant C-3, $5,810.96. Council concurrence recommended. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Approval AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Proposed Motion Letter from Planning Director Ericksen presented proposed King County by King County -- Motion No. 77-237 which is enabling legislation to allow cities and Joint Spheres of counties to establish joint spheres of influence. The letter noted Interest some merit in establishing spheres of influence, noting possible resolv- ing of conflict as in the case of annexations such as the questions raised by Mr. Radovich in the Springbrook proposal . The letter noted concern that the city might be inadvertently committed to unforeseen improvements or obligations such as the extension of utilities without prior annexation to the city. The letter also noted P-I article that King County is taking a more significant role in regional control and is interested in becoming a dominant government in the overall area; the letter noting the proposed enabling legislation would not appear to have substantial effect one way or another on effectuating such elements. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER LETTER AND PROPOSED MOTION TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 25, 1977 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M.Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the regular meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President Pro tem; PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, KENNETH D. BRUCE, WILLIAM J. GRANT. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL PRESIDENT GEORGE J. PERRY. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS C. J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; DON CUSTER, Administrative Assistant; GARY KRUGER, Planning Department Rep. ; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; RICHARD GEISSLER, Acting Fire Chief; CAPT. BUFF, Police Representative. PRESS MARK PELLEGRINO, Renton Tribune; DON SMITH, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 1977 COUNCIL MEETING AS WRITTEN AND DISTRIBUTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted , published CATV Ordinance and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to consider the proposed cable television franchise ordinance, hearing Continued to continued from March 21 , 1977. MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, 5/9/77 COUNCIL CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING FOR TWO WEEKS IN ORDER TO COMPLETE REVIEW OF THE ORDINANCE. Community Services Committee Chairwoman Thorpe noted committee has been meeting weekly to review input for proposed ordinance, urging Council members to review, particularly systems expan- sion and rate structure. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, posted LID #300 Sewers and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing Olympic View continued from April 18, to consider Local Improvement District No. 390 Terrace sanitary sewer lines , trunk lines and appurtenances thereto in the Olympic View Addition south of S. 27th Street and east of Benson Rd. Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason recommended final equaliza- tion of costs with City participation of Utility funds in amount of 4,500 and Current fund participation in amount of $3,500 for reduction from final assessment roll of $75,342.25, equalized assessment roll in amount of $67,342.25. The letter explained the $4,500 utility participa- tion represents a trunkage charge of approximately $.O1 per sq.ft. which will be recovered as a charge against other properties developing in the future and utilizing this sewer system. The amount of $3,500 rep- resents a reduction in the City' s charges for incidental expenses in connection with the LID, noting the City costs had increased $5,500 over the original estimate and that the equalized roll will be a 10. 19% increase on the properties included in the LID; that the City will be picking up 13. 08% of the total increased cost which was 23.27% over original estimate of $69,955.03. The letter further explained the LID was not charged a $.O1 per square foot system development charge as the LID was commenced prior to adoption of the City's ordinance requiring such payment, with net result that when unconnected areas connect to this system they will be charged the standard $.O1 per sq.ft. systems development charge plus the $.01 per sq.ft. share of the trunkage for this LID, or a total trunkage charge of $.02 per sq.ft. The Public Works Director' s letter recommended approval , that this represents a reasonable compromise on the part of the City. Persons present making comments : Marion Folino, 1305 S.27th St. , com- plained of location of sewer connection T, lack of contact with home- owners when ditching across driveways, and discourteous flagmen. Mayor Delaurenti asked the Public Works Director to contact the contractor regarding complaints. Councilman Stredicke inquired re standards estab- lished by the City for traffic flagmen; Councilwoman Thorpe inquired of City inspectors on projects and was advised by Public Works Director Gonnason of the inspectors duties , that the City taking over contractor's duties will increase cost of LID's and increase need for more City person- nel . Gonnason explained reductions in individual assessments, which ranged from $200 to $2,000 on the 24 parcels included in the project. Norman Anchors, 1523 S. 27th St., reported loose manhole cover as dang- erous , having received no response from Police Department. Howard Christopherson, 10644 SE 165th, reported satisfaction with LID. 1.- 111 1 ' 1 ' r111 N ' 1 1. 1 r' iwi: soil' riol' MWsit arm w Ikkb Pi n v. LI o 7 ' l ' X7 grog 13ntod QNnOS . 139nd o° w h K CYfit is j rg h ieli o 6% t an V D vtv- . cm -, 1 in • w a 1 2 a la 4 h 1 14. ao' A•• c 0 . .. S 31t4 ' c1lY' 1 ay CD 1 0 3 ega I 17-1 Z 8 aa rl [ 1 0 rii a‘ A 2 r N. ii.et a . E 1 Y h an ase op ego • immi ap einib L+ so,.._ R yw WEsr VALLEY N RlvtR INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO:Gordon Ericksen, :,-.anning Director llk,TE',. May 5, 1977 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk Re: Ordinance on Anderson Rezone - G to M-1 Please furnish new map and check legal description of the above-captioned rezone. This ordinance was on first reading May 2, and will go on 2nd and final reading May 9th. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : WarreR Gonnason, Public Works Director DATE : May 2, 1977 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RECEIVED RE : Ordinances and Resolutions MAY 2 - Ordinance - Anderson Rezone 1977 CITY OF RENTONPUBLICWORKS We attach Rem e-n (s ) and/or Ordinances (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee. route * Date c 2 72 0 : W . Gonnason J . Williams D. Bennett R. Nelson D. Miller Cheryl R. Houghton 4 Alice M. Touma Ot-ter ROM: `,'-'r,ri - Cc)', 67,-J v- E . Review and report back . See me . Route and return. Prepare response for my signature . Take appropriate action. Prepare special report . Set up meeting. For your information. File . EMARKS : I N T E R O F F I C E CORRESPONDENCE Date May 4, 1977 TO:Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Dick Houghton, Engineering Supvr. SUBJECT: Ordinance - Anderson Rezone In checking the attached ordinance as to form and correctness of legal description, we find the ordinance to be unsatisfactory. Section I refers to "the following described property" subject to rezone, and labeled Exhibit A. Exhibit A is represented as a sketch only, without benefit of a legal description. It would be up to the Planning Department to accept or reject Exhibit A in this form. AH:pmp 0 A 19-11 CIV of RENTON sc'^ CLERIC'S OFFICE , F'2Z2L Q2\' b INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM o1 8.e11TO : Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner 7 E : May 2, 1977 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk 1.›. RE : Ordinances and Resolutions t Anderson Rezone Ordinance Cj- ,5 0• Z G Q1, We attach R.e.s,.alatJ.. a.(s) and/or Ordinances (s ) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee. Advise as to covenants per City Attorney's inquiry. If none, we shall forward the ordinance for first reading tonight. 6 I N T E R O F F I C E MEMO TO: Del Mead, City Clerk DATE: April 28 , 1977 FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone Ordinance Dear Del: Enclosed herewith is the original of a proposed Ordinance re the above captioned rezone. We assume that there are no restrictive covenants attached to this rezoning. Please attach the legal description. GErard M. Shellan GMS:nd Encl. INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Del Mead, City Clerk DATE: April 28 , 1977 FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone Ordinance Dear Del : Enclosed herewith is the original of a proposed Ordinance re the above captioned rezone. We assume that there are no restrictive covenants attached to this rezoning. Please attach the legal description. GEr rd hell n GMS : nd Encl. Renton City Council 5/2/77 Page 4 Senior Citizen Councilman Stredicke noted his motion tabled 4/25 (Po.3 :1inutesl .-rferring Center & Water funding for both the City' s . water shop facility and senior center to Shop Facility the Administration and to the special (to be appointed) shops committee Funding to report back. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THE MATTER OF Again Tabled FUNDING FOR WATER SHOP FACILITY AND SENIOR CENTER BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. MOVED BY. STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL AUTH- ORIZE THE 'MAYOR TO SUBMIT REFERENDUM 29 GRANT APPLICATION. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, THE QUESTION COUNCILMAN STREDICKE RAISED LAST WEEK BE TABLED UNTIL NEXT WEEK. CARRIED. Public Services Public Services - Aviation - Committee report submitted by Aviation Committee Report Committee Chairman Stredicke, noted that in Order to serve Aero-Dyne's Aviation new facility, housing administrative offices , flight school and Aero-Dyne Corp. maintenance hanger, three-phase electrical service will be required. Wire Undergrounding That Aero-Dyne has expressed an interest in undergroundinstallation City Participation if the City would be willing to participate in this project and it would eliminate six poles and overhead dines which have been a hazard to aircraft. The report furtha' Explained the project would be consis- tent with the airport' s policy of undergrounding new electrical facil- ities and previous participation with users along the new West Perimi- ter Road. The committee therefore recommended that the City participate with the Aero-Dyne Corporation in the amount of 50% of the total cost for providing underground service, not to exceed $5,000, which will be paid from the. airport construction fund. Councilman Stredicke explained tax dollars would not be used. MOVED BY BRUCE, SECONDED BY THORPE , COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT OF THE AVIATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL MEMBERS BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FISCAL IMPACT OF EACH PROJECT PROPOSED. Councilwoman Fiscal Impact Shinpoch explained desire to know cost of proposed projects in order on Proposed to determine or compare with benefit received, noting it would be Projects Required administrative to determine source of funding. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES : CLYMER, BRUCE, SHINPOCH, THORPE; ONE-NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST FOR FISCAL IMPACT TO THE WAYS 'AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR NECESSARY LEGISLATION. CARRIED. Meeting Time Extended MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED' BY tHORPE, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND EXTEND COUNCIL MEETING BEYOND THE 11 :00 PM CLOSING TIME IN ORDER TO PRESENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS . CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Ways and Means Committee report was submitted by Chairman ClymerCommitteeReportrecommendingsecondandfinalreadingsofanordinancerelating tospecialmeetingsoftheCityCouncil (first reading 4/25/77) . Follow-Ordinance #3131 ing readings , it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT Special Meetings THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED setting second Thursday of each month at the hour of eight o'clock for special or Committee of the Whole meetings of the Council . Ordinance #3132 The committee report recommended second and final readings of anJestHillordinanceannexingcertainproperty (City of Renton water shed) to Annexation for the City, known as the West Hill Annexation (first reading 4/25) .Water Reservoir . Following readings , it was MOVED BY CLYMER; SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading of anAndersonRezone .ordinance rezoning property located near SW 43rd and W.Valley Hwy.R-031-77 from General Classification District G to Manufacturing Park District MP, known as the Anderson Rezone. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. T Ordinance #3133 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended first, second and Final Assessment final •readings of an ordinance approving the final , revised assessment LID #300 Sewers roll for LID #300 in amount of $67,342.25. Following first reading, itOlympicView •was MOVED BY CLYMER, 'SECONDED BY BRUCE', 'COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS`DUE TO ACCRUING INTEREST. CARRIED. Following readings it was .MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ.' Upon: inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, Finance Director Marshall explained' C ity participation. in amount of 4,500 from utility fund and $3,500 from general fund. Upon further inquiry, Public Works Director noted .no •sewer lines were laid outside of the `C.ity. ROLL CALL : 4-AYES: CLYMER," BRUCE, SHINPOCH, THORPE; ONE-NO: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED: r April 5, i` 77 r OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAP°LINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: John Anderson FILE NO. R-031-77 LOCATION: Approximately 120 ' north of S.W. 43rd between West Valley Highway and Puget Sound Pdwer and Light transmission right-of-way. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from G to M-P , manufacturing park, to allow for development of the site as per manufacturing park district requirements. SUMMARY OF Planning Department : Recommend approval. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 22 , 1977 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on March 29 , 1977 , at 11 : 25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and Mr. Gary Volchok, representing the applicant , had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Plot Plan. Exhibit #3 : Assessor' s Map. The Examiner asked if Mr. Smith had additional information or exhibits to present. Mr. Smith reported he had no further information to present. The Examiner asked Mr. Volchok if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was : Mr. Gary Volchok 16 Park Place Seattle, WA 98101 Mr. Volchok indicated his concurrence in the report and had no further comments . The Examiner asked Mr. Volchok if he was aware that while the application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, an M-P zone requires site plan approval which must be submitted in R-031-77 Page Two a separate application to be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. He also questioned Mr. Volchok about the drainage problems on the far eastern portion of the property. Mr. Volchok reported that he was aware that site plans must be approved, and that drainage would be accomplished by utilizing the Burlington Northern right-of-way. The Examiner noted that access from the property would utilize ' S.W. 43rd Street which will be widened in the near future and is a heavily traveled street, and asked Mr. Volchok if he had considered alternative access points from the property. Mr. Smith indicated that S .W. 43rd Street is a secondary access with the West Valley Highway being the major access road for the property, but detailed site development plans had not been drawn. Mr. Volchok reported that a two-way left turn access is being designed on the north boundary of the property in coordination with the Truckweld facility. The Examiner inquired about the existing grade on the property. Mr. Smith reported that the site would be filled eventually, and this process would change the elevation and grade. The Examiner informed Mr . Volchok that a fill permit would be required by the Building Division at that time. The Examiner questioned Mr. Volchok on matters relating to zoning designations of surrounding properties , who indicated that he anticipated that businesses now located on S .W. 43rd Street would eventually correspond with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Examiner expressed concern about these properties maintaining a common access point, and indicated that these aspects would be addressed during site plan approval. The Examiner asked if there were further comments. Since there were none , the hearing on Item #R-031-77 was closed by the Examiner at 11 : 40 a.m. FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter , the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1. Mr. John Anderson, owner of the property, was represented by Gary Volchok who spoke in his behalf. 2. Mr. Volchok indicated that he has reviewed the Planning Department staff report and concurs in the staff findings. The request is to rezone the 6 . 9 acre parcel of property from G to M-P , Manufacturing Park. The application request concurs with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The property was posted and there was no apparent opposition either written or spoken. This property is one of the last few remaining parcels fronting West Valley Highway that have not been zoned M-P. 3 . The application request agrees with the latest Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan document which was adopted by the city in June of 1976. 4. Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 as amended, R.C.W. 43. 216 , Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible public official , has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance for the subject proposal. However , actual development of the site will require further environmental review. 5. The Examiner stated to Mr. Volchok that the rezone request is only the first part of a two-step process in order to develop the subject property. The next process will require a site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner. The Examiner also noted several problems relating to drainage, access and future grades . The Examiner also informed Mr. Volchok that a fill permit would be required by the Building Division at the time of building permit application. R-031-77 Page Three 6. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues , findings of fact, applicable policies and provisions and departmental recommendations in this matter and this report itself, being uncontested, is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full herein. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The application request is apparently uncontested and is in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2. It is apparent in reviewing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the existing zoning that the request is in compliance with existing and future development of manufacturing uses in this area. The applicant' s representative was aware of potential on-site improvements that would be required to be addressed at the time of site plan approval. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval subject to the Planning Department recommendations. ORDERED THIS 5th day of April, 1977. g s L. M. . •.tadt and Use -.ring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of April , 19 by certified mail to the parties of record: Gary Volchok TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of April , 1977 to the following : Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071 , Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before April 12 , 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures , errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 29, 1977 PAGE TWO RE : JOHN ANDERSON , REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-031-77 , G TO M-P 2 . Soils : Puyallup (Py ) . Permeability moderately rapid . Soil is used for urban development. Newberg (Ng ) . Perme- ability is moderate . Soil used mostly for row crops . Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo ) . Permeability is moderately slow . Seasonal high water table at or near the surface . Soil used for row. crops , pasture , and urban development . 3 . Vegetation : Site consists primarily of scrub grass and brush . 4 . Wildlife : Existi'Qg vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : The site may experience seasonal high water at or near the turface . 6. Land Use : Subject site is presently undeveloped . The proposed Truckweld facility is located directly to the north . Puget Sound Power and Light Company right-of-wayandBurlingtonNorthernright-of-way are located east of the subject site . Several older single family residences and businesses exist south of the property along S . W. 43rd Street . West Valley Road and the Green River border the westerly edge of the site . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : Area consists of a mixture of undeveloped land , existing industrial uses , older residences , business uses , and transportation corridors . The older residences along S . W . 43rd St . , however , are. located in an existing B- 1 business zone . The area is in a transition from resi dential and abandoned pasture land to industrial uses . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : Existing in the area are 12" water mains along West Valley Highway and S . W. 43rd St. and an 8 sewer along Puget Sound Power and Light right-of-way . Storm sewers are not available . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any further development of the site will be subject to City of Renton standards . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route No . 150 operates along West Val - ley Highway south of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The site is within the Renton School District. 5 . Parks : Several city and county parks and recreational areas are located near the subject site . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-725 , ' Amendments 2 . 4-729G, General Classification District 3 . 4-730 , M-P , Manufacturing Park District I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June 1976 . 2 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Industrial , pages 11 and 12 and General Development Plans , page 16 . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 2 9 1977 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER AM PM PUBLIC HEARING 7,81911O,dhaa211,213,4 54 A MARCH 29 , 1977 fEXHI ITT NO / APPLICANT: JOHN ANDERSON FILE NO: R-031-77 REZONE FROM G TO M-X e NO R-® ®- 774 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from G to M-P , manufacturing park , to allow for development of the site as per manufacturing park dis- trict requirements . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : JOHN ANDERSON 2. Applicant : JOHN ANDERSON 3 . Location : Approximately 120 ' north of S . W. 43rd between West Valley Highway and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission right-of-way . 4 . Legal Description : Legal description on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property: Approximately 6 . 9 acres . 6 . Access : Via West Valley Highway and S . W . 43rd Street. 7 . Existing Zone : G. General Classification District. 8. Existing Zoning M-P , Manufacturing Park ; B- 1 , Business in Area : District ; and G, General Classification District. 9 . Comprehensive Manufacturing Park Land Use Plan: 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chron- icle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Subject rezone is to allow for planned construction as per the M-P district requirements . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The general area has been historically known as Orillia . Portions of the older community lie directly south of the subject site . The proposed Truckweld manufacturing facility is located directly north of the subject site . The site is situated within the one hundred year flood plain of the Green River. E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level and is generally lower than the existing level of West Valley Highway . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 29 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : JOHN ANDERSON , REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-031-77 , G TO M-P J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezoning of the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However, eventual development of the site will alter existing ground levels as a result of filling of the site . Storm water runoff and traffic will increase as a result of eventual development of the site. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Not applicable. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended ( RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the sub- ject proposal (see attached ) . However, actual development of the site will .. require further environmental review . M, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Engineering Division 2. City of Renton Utilities Division 3. City of Renton Building Division 4 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject rezone request is compatible with the manufacturing park designation of the Comprehensive Plan for the area . 2 . The applicant has, indicated that the portion of the site that is adjacent to S . W. 43rd St . will be used as an alternate access to the main portion of the property . 3. The proposed rezone is also compatible with existing and anti - cipated developments along West Valley Highway. Site plan approval of specific development plans is required within the. M-P Manufacturing Park District . 4. Environmental impact on the subject site and adjacent property ,including the storm water runoff, noise , glare , air pollution , etc . , will be reviewed in detail prior to approval of any site development plans or pre-loading activity. 5. The subject site is also within Shoreline Management jurisdic- tion , and a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Per- mit will be required for specific site development. 6 . Utilities are available to the subject site . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of rezone request from G to M-P. The M-P zone classification is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan , existing land use , and existing zoning within the general area .All development , fill , pre-load , etc . , will be subject to review under the M-P zone and Shoreline Master Program will be reviewedindetailpriortoapprovalofanysitedevelopmentplansor pre-load , etc . 1- 1i . i , ,, , , ,. 1 1I ,.,>. , , 1 ' I ii 1 I I o i WI I I I I n 1 i9'" /1 I II 1 l L.. 5 — — — U LI f 1 'i I Z '- 1 7z I 1 11 7 j 1 P l i I WI Ir IM...p . 1la I I 1 I o H—I a . .,. ... .. I4 11i .1 / HI W n v, w LI /, m.p 1 Q At A A•: 1 / 4. J i' )4 II__ I ll w 1 0 1 I 1 1 H":.. 1 : :. : :iii; 1 ' "g 114, I MGII I f:'f i.:r i n I tir I\ l I fir IlI t. li ^ to r / I 1`' il J 0 REZONE : JOHN ANDERSON ; Appl . No . R-031-77 ; rezone from G to M-P ; property located West Valley Highway between S . W . 43rd Street and S . W . 41st Street . APPLICANT JOHN ANDERSON TOTAL AREA 6 . 85 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS West Valley Highway EXIS1 ING ZONING G EXISTING USE Unimproved property PROPOSED USE Construct a machine distribution and service center for a construction equipment division of Star Machinery . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS I 1 I PROPOSED/FINAL DL—_ARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/U -SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-031-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-222-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests a rezone from G to M-P , mpnufacturing Rack, to allow for development of the site as per manu- facturing park district requirements . Proponent JOHN ANDERSON Approximately 120' north of S.W. 43rd between West VdTTey Location of Proposal Highway and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission R/W. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to have x not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS is pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma-de after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title P a in Dire for Date March 22 , 1977 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76' AFFIDAVIT I , To+) AdDP2. QAJ being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner. of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information • herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 2.0.-day of peg 19777 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at,((/tee. /17A-tab . AO' 4••/. .);c.c L. ®/®r, Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner god p • p ekre --$74 H,A) o 130) /OO`f o Address') Address) 1704/^)tri M( 1)59 fiekrk-o i-va) City) State( Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found t.- rough and complete in every particular and to conform to the ru inaR1€ g ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the fi4gnrrl\ ch Ua lication . CJ Date Received pip 3 gT( , 19 By: f G D t8. Renton Planning Dept .t . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON 1lEog_1 O REZONE APPLICATION v MAR 3 NTT For Office Use Only: 51 APPL. NO. Jr - 03%- 7 PLANNING COMMISSION iltFTION FLU ie® ._ FEE; RECEIPT NO. // 5 9 APPEAL FILED NG D' FILING DATE 3 -7 7 CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE 3-.2q-77 ORDINANCE NO. & DATE e /iu .9 bo v 7?- pL4CE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : ex>, 9thc) T®+ftl &NJ-0,2la oDJ — 44t V®Le46G Ac 1. Name 4?eAl ' pox Ot JCem phone Z2 7147,‘ 2. Address , 0. or- / o® argil Dle I.SA 11-•.-A4 96110 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on L'Aik-liex 141j4q. between SW '3 and SL Li1 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach separate sheet) err,S, /I B r'9 e 6/ ,-tt Gac 4.0 2, 3 0 Li 6 . Existing zoning 4 Zoning Requested J - NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate . 7 . Proposed use of site. 7)(. , a g aw G ,PPe/f4ger 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. il r 1 2,4yr-7-,r-f'=;p . _y 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 2-73 1 AFFIDAVIT l i , °jo4 P opo being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 2. -aay of Peg 19-77 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing atNereiea /C 410 L. V(a 11- • r Name of Notary Public) Sbgnature of Owner) 6 00 7 cue -cr A, pô ff - /00 Addres Address) City)State( 22, ' 7/gew Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION Phis is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules''`— ulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the fil,' Fo - 111V, 0 pplication . 0.-- ckab Date Received fC 19 By : VaIIR 9AyN nr Q 4 Renton Planning Dept . 2-7.3 4 - w a CITY OF RENTON, WASH!NGTON IAN \ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 2977 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DEPARlt. xv Application No.e6 /- T7 Environmental Checklist No. -4nrC- .7a- 77 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance [::] Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.. . ' The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND f 1. Name of Proponent ZlQ I F U Crel_e/. — L- \/OLC g. av-rAi'" 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: jd 6,00 — ptriaKpc. cc ti/0i 3. Date Checklist submitted o 4. Agency requiring Checklist ri-ri ,r a'n"v J/ IvL //Tr 5 . Name of proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : gviLD/A 4 000 D t % J"oo ce,. -0/ E7,. 86+ I LD/,vj i,uD ifv ,,rvcoc O = or-pc6 ./=0,p A Co"trite umaas e v e4-7~ 7/ vPS, o/-1 OF 444hcRi wee-6 Epfrrefc, Fol. t bv.7-etr; L t I/a.i, , Petri , erC 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : tv, &/r/if, likrt - ce .d j'C4 ,e ITV 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : • 2-- / n'r. 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : C\Ts( Fvrt.1)rN1 PLk MFAJ1 si Ft/rm, . CO u *t. -- kt O a ao ge;0 L 0 y I. VA,rue t/A—e peerAn 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain : NI ES r, + 8 u l e D i ll S Ler c#'-0 FOR— t 6 jlu i -frJ, • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: AID 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is •expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: q 2 e., p-cpi t.,7'—c/&' c/" jam. r'.'. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? 00,D S°rra-'"' YES MAYBE NO6Ihd,q 6c c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE d) The destruction , covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Y MB NOENO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? Y S MAYBE 0` f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or• erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or .any bay , inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 1 3- I 2) Air. Will the proposal result in : a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? X Y MMAYBE Ni c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE N Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in : a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? O"" I Are go-r-aw7IoN Or re/P t(r "'A*CpL YES • M YBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?y YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) 'Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality„ including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE N f) Alteration of the' direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE Explanation : 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,)® microflora and aquatic plants)? y rz(/ v.rlto) y le"SS RC j7G Are ly''`j w`/ N YET— MAYBE AO LA-w/a tCArFiAaq b) Reduction of the numbers bf any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE 'NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? I•i49,••/.sOl^c. ,A,7 Y MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage/ of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE 0 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of - fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna?y YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 'VVt° p 'e'°'/9tie el Gins,! 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE Nam • Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of. the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the, proposal result in : a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri - bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? TES--- MAYBE Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or • create a demand for additional housing? . YES MAYBE NO Explanation: POL IA-O l—d 1A 4Ze icy e,_ To e•4. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) Generati n of additional vehicular movement ME'w uSiNtitSS a s4l' S~na A•i•+@e' YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities ,• or demand • for new parking? or..) Sprit p4rtfctel Fob, eph72 ,yee'.5 YE MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YE RATITE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? TE-S-- MAYBE NO Explanation : 14) Public Services . Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? Ts YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE \NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? 7( YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAY E. NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal .result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YET— MAYBE NU • Explanation: 16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for. new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES rTAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE. NO • f) Solid waste and disposal ? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:' 746_ RO(Au'P Z4r J ILI?"[ re C d 0 rEc --a, us e eiP eke,/ . 9 frice /'rg 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding v mental health)? f. YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in the 'obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation.. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned , state that to the best of my knowledge the above information • is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency .may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: •07e°"/ i ned ame printe City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINERATHISREGULARMEETINGINTHECOUNCILCHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 29 1977 , AT 9 :00 A . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . REZONE FROM GS- 1 AND S- 1 TO R-2 AND R-3 ; file No . R-028-77 ; property located on Monroe Ave . N . E . between N . E . 6th St . and N . E . 4th St . 2 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-031-77 ; property located on West Valley Highway between S . W. 43rd and S . W. 41st . 3. SITE APPROVAL IN B- 1 ZONE ; file No . SA-032-77 ; property located between Shattuck Ave . S . and Whitworth Ave . S . immediately north of Houser Way S . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 29 , 1977 AT 9 :00 A . M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED PLANNING DIRECTOR UBLISHED March 18, 1977 CERTIFICATION I , Michael L . Smith HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 15th day of March 19 II . SIGNED ;(. ,cG 4c.G. . THE CITY OF RENTON zT' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 4 7 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTNIENT O' 4T_ gkq-235-2550 D SF'1t March 9 , 1977 John Anderson P. 0. Box 10040 Bainbridge Island , WA 98110 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-031-77 Ger.tlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted theabovementionedapplicationonMarch3 , 1977 Apu:lic hearing before the City of Renton Hearing ExaminerhasbeensetforMarch29 , 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre-sect. All interested persons are invited to attend thehearing . If you have any further questions , please calltheRentonPlanningDepartment , 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director By : M chael L . Smith Associate Planner wr cc : John Rabel - Gary L . Volchok L, 1 INTERDEPARTMENTALTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO : PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR i>"''' BUILDING DIVISION ENGINEERING DIV - _i.k TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITIES D- ' I , FIRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT i41 1 Contact Person R E : V1 Gr J rs e "i i' Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal lid return it to the Planning Department by 3 17/77 with your written recomme dation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT 44/41"4/ Date 3 /e77 r i 1 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) 41 ` 4 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Z34.-77 ; Application No . : R-031-77 Action Name : J AW A SDh K4,4Zpv4 e 4044 4410417 Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : 707e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : CD ‘ Comments : 6 , g)',74P71 v(eielaYie --e4;ect-e,74--- 3iE/ 7 Signature irector or Aut orized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C12 1 s-iP Y vi1,t_r Comments : C GYS"2.7 Gad/ 2—mli f Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 OVER) r- iz REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : A IiclIcS /P,,Iptic 0-J.A7/ .S Comments :ArJ DIApe.j Signature of Director or Authori edr Representative Da e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : 7Department : y•-•(....) C o m me n t vl) z -27 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ----Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : c -i' 2_-z.z,.,,,z. (._--.• - --o-2:---; 0,.,V7 2 Signature of Director or AuTthorized Representative Date 01VIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS Department : Comments : ignature of Director or Authorized Representative --Date w April 5`., 19;7 7 ram r; OFFICE OF THE LAND USE` NEARIN G EXAf°'I NER 1,:::: ::':::".:.,..,',:.:..':.1',',.:..':,... L,..:'..:"'',..:'.: 1,:"'.: ,,::::,.''...:: ,:,';',.‘:',..,:,',..::: CITY OF REfdTQ J : ` REPORT. AND RECOMMENDATION .TO •THE:`:RENTO,N,_,:'CI,TY CO`UN,CJ L APPLICANT: John Anderson'' FILE 'NO '.R:='031`-77..' r LOCATION.: Approximatel:y;'1'2'0„ 'north', ;'S:•W':, 43rd .be.twe.en' West Valley_ Highway;: and .Puget` 'Sound "Power;:•,and. Light. transm` `ssi:o„7.!, ;.ght-of--w,ay SUMMARY' OF REQUEST;` . Applicant requests' a "r,e'zone'.`,f:r.om'::G to;M-P,;, manu'factur,ing".;Park; to`.allow':for:;;de.velopment of ' the' site. as', e'r'-:°'ma'nuf•a;cturri ar'k:districtPg-;`P re u'irements b o r. SUMMARY, .OF Plannin Delpartment`i;'• ,Recommend` :a prova'1,:,g P RECOMMENDATION Hearing Examiner.: Recommend= a rov'a1' ; , PLA'NNING DEPARTMENT, '.'The . Plannin ';'De artment'.:''staf f'`!r-e ort' :was`:re.ceived',i,';sgPP REPORT bythe. Exami-ne`r': on lMar'ch°' 22 197:7: PUBLIC,!:H'EARING, After r,ev ewi'ri the:`Plann'i•ri' ;De artment'-°re ort ,g•9; P P examining ;avai'1'ab''le'4informat:ion'':.on .°fle`r.w-ith the ' a licat'i'on and"} f ie'1'`=' `c•Y e'cka n'`" the :ro'''e.rt ' and ''.``PP g; P P : surrounding the`R'Examiner;'.condu'cted a ubli iri h;;e .hear on 't 'sub ct 'as' follows- The' hearin .was opened on MarcYi- 2:9` T9'7.7.. a:t.-''ll :25'`.-•'a• :iri-"the Couri'c,il:;'., Chambers of the , 4:;::::'11'' Rent'on Municipal ::B:ui'l iri : > ie wi h nParts' s i o' stifto we e. 's `n ,.r woritgY r_I.l'f i" waskre e eIt`: ort d •`that th Heari:ri r:Exain 'rier,ari `Mr Gar .V lcho - i ie 'reset n ..the t. ad =ree'-' ed and=' "e` e' PPgPPev, J,, ,.r ii., wed;,`the harr ri- ,, , De artment'. 're ort and' the ';re ot ,;:was~"'.ente*'';e`d:>: n o t `e:` '` `cord'.: asPP : P.r t. h re r a hib t 1Ex Mi h el i h RcaSmt tannin De artmen€ :re,viewed r:xh :b °t<°'` l 'nd; entered`' the following additional exhibits: 'into .the "r`ecor,d: Exhibit •.#2. P1ot 'P'lanl Exhibit 3 Assessor'' s`^'Ma The Examiner asked' if Mr. Smith.:h'ad_ 1 additional,-,informat'ion:;o'rexhib its'_ :` to present: M'r. Smith 'reported` he, .;had` rip£" further t nformat:ion:;'.to Pre sent The Examiner asked. Mr'. Vol if: he''.concurred;: in' Exhib.it''':• #1 : '',;:: Res ondin was. P g Mr. Gary Volchok 16 Park "P1ace vi ',' eS attle WA' 9 8101,' Mr. Volchok indicated his , concurrence '°> ri'; ,t'h_e° 're: ornd had' no'', furth'e :;,': comments Ex in as Mr. V 1 h k. iTheameraoco f: he;was."aware:': 'th`at Yrle', a lication _is i'n . conformance-':w '4,' t'he:..Co 'retie' 's;>we;"Lia :U's.e P :an:" at "'M zone` re u res:: tan ,-- `rovaa- 'which: must ;bey+.subm ated-, i,, '',:" ',, k.e IZ INrr;%:. r rgrp r u£.Y> R01:•''7°7 Page' Two - a' -s'eparate application to be reviewed 'by''t'he. .:Heari'ng Examiner:' . He also . questioned Mr. Volchok about :the•. drainage problems. .on...,-...he,:.far' eastern portion ,of the property. Mr" Vo;lc.hok;`'rrepor. •te,d':•tha: he -'was aware .that ,site plans .must b.e•, approved•, 'ian:d' t`hat'';drain'age j wou•ld` )be.• t-'`' accomplished by utilizing' the- Burlington:,;No•rt'he•r .':r'i.ght=of. way' The Examiner noted- that access ' from.:'the•,`prop;erty;';,wou'ld'r utilize S.W. '.43rd Street which will be widened'.: n• `_t'he near ' future .,and."i"s a heavily traveled. street, and asked :_, Vo'lcli;ok' -if'' he 'had. considered alternative ' access, points from.-the;;property: :;: 'Mr':':Smith'':;indidated that ,.S .W. . 43rd Street. is a secondary, access' wi`th-';the'"'We'st ;Valley:: Highway being the major access: ro.ad.:=-f.or,';.the' pr.ope'r;ty';:'-,but::de.tai:led ' : : ',;- Sit'e development plans had riot. been;;:drawn':': Mrs: %:Voichok :'r.epor:ted•:. that' a: two-way left turn access is being de'sign'ed;.'.'on ;?the`:north; boundary of the property_ in coord-i'nation' rwit'1i =``the"':Truc,kweid.,;fac' l ty. The' Examiner inquired about the ex st 'n r'adef' on".;t e,: ro ert Mr.. Smith 'r'e orted' thatg.''g ..• P P .. Y,'.'';>-,: , p the site.'would' ;b'e'',;f i l'led. ''even.t'ual ly,;•,...•and•'::t;h s' process •would change the elevation''''an-d :grade'::•, -The-';Ex'aminer. •informed_ Mr 'Volchok' that' a fill'_'permit.'would;,:be 'r:'equ'i'red':,by he Bu,il'din g: Division' at that t 'me:;,, r • ,: The xa .i a. .E m ner :quest'ion'ed• Mr. Vo'lchok'; on:,,mlaltters':._;re'latin'g `to zon ,,ri designations 'of surroundin ro: er i rgPwh tedthaf''.he'; r. _ anti:ci a!ted that. 'busi tenses •now located:;o <;Srt'6J°>'.4:3 :d?' P r'':r S;tr e,et ,wp'uayd' eventuallycorrespo nd with, the ':;Com' eYien's iv'e`:'-Ta:rid.'';Use:`Pla'n`: :Th'e°P. Examiner •'•e'x ressed.:conc'ern b I{p about,''•th'e-se: ro'`er t 'es'r:'ma' rilt'a` n'in a, Ir tcommn-i,a'o access oint_ and inp . , d;cated t'hatt Y es'e-'as'.ec'k's:°''wo'ul d'; be,.P r'' fu +Y,r s e 1t an 'a •ro;va1'.. rr Cplll.. Z9fir, The` E .ariiine asked if, where were 'further`..coinnent s':::_>.' 1 n e"Ith` n e'.la ar n •.ori -Item` R 031"-:.77 s,,,. 'l' see': g wa c„o d...b...,:the;:.:Ex;amne`r;':=at ::: - t• - roe`° Pr 411 0 .a.m•. n.'. f:' s.•••,•.l'..• :ei. t..'i' FINDINGS 'CONCLUSI,ONS.' `& RECOMMENDATIONS? .JHav` n'' reviewed .,`t ,e.• record ' in his m'att'er the• 'Examiner ,now makes'rr'kand; ente;r -''-t:h`.e ,floll'owin' r r !cr''i 1'4 l I i ,1.•ll n ram'.,C1' F D`I NGSIN i!:r I v''' 1 :4 0 k= r t s,< 7ewnli .M hn And rson` o er; of "the:'' o e;r't.,' -"wa s:;.re 'efife.d>;'b w";' r` Jo pr P P`'r'eS Y`;' V j rksoke' is his'xfGar ,Volcfio °who ii sb '`l f:': ls:ekia , Y2 k!..,,:indicatedMr` V 1cYio th Yie` `s= e:•' e1M e 'h D,. oat ' a •r v w d's t e-`P'larii ing. ep artment; staff report and, concurs. i'a'.;afie' ,sltaf•f.,,f rid' ii s•' {;. h'e?':r:e `ize 't, is' t ezone h 6 9orte acre arcel •_of•. ro..ert fr_om G;`---to•:,M:•P Mantifacturin .P•ark`: The •a lication.°re :est''"•cone' rsi`w ' t hi -t'hgppiq,t.u t . e,• s::i o hens e L n Use 'P n T I''`- C m re v a d l'a li'e: •• ro'`e t•" cwa •o,s;t:edan.d','.;tYe're'`P P et-6 Y-( P. s 1.as a si i'o' apparent-nt o o tion 'e ther;'w. .'i•' `e'' 'off s•' ,k.•'Th 's=:t r t:t ri' r `o en,' i:;. r i.t::'' pP PP P is' h i'• e:i't' $, ro .ert one' of- t e last _fe.w: Tema n' ri arc. lsi'f'ron t n :•we-st.;° r•V l l i hk' a e :H hwa -,fli4t- ave-:not: bee' zoaed-• M=P' ::i 4l 4, v'=c j{il T s' 3'he' l'ication•;, e" ue•st ees''w'i' e`'" 'G ee 'R"iwer: -V l'ea` r a `'r ta ;;tY'e. ,l`a t st". r- ri°°,: a'l 'M., i . f , i4'e 7;. Y h,:,.11'i:. - GACom 'ehens e; P: n' doe n' wYii: s" o' e b e'F c-i;t u;.r l a ume t c•h•wa• ,ad t, d'9: °'.t Yi,ri` ' F i;;; H: 1. _ f..•' r. i'l'c t• rY P s n to the it o f R'en on En' ir'ori e' Or4uruat. c y' t .• v m n'ta i d• Hance~,and ':tlie State Environmental Policy .Act; of -1'97,,..t.as•: amended; c:.°R.C.W::; :4:3: 2:16.', E i kse res 'risible d$14'e.'of:fk-q. al h,' s'sue'_ Gordon .Y r c n.:Po p, i; ,..;:',. as•'' d';a'' - ;' ;,., S 7" t• f: pr^%,-'`y.i if S' _' I t'`'N' ,j'•d4,:.n' ratio . -of'Si n'if canoe,,,::fore:>•th , ,s;tiib."ect ;r,o `olivl';':;-',rHo'weve'r, aact`ua=1':. develo men :of 'ahe."`s te'::wi.l °rye'-;u` re'_f.u'r'a e - =erivro +e taa•• P t''q h. ,z' Inm, n ?- l.' ,Err=.•','':F.gyp.if a.nevi w l' rt 4; i'J nja''si,iif5Thei. z`' s i'is'• Exam rter `s e -to' M 'Vol k` tla at`'.'' fi"`.`` e one.' ,re :ue t}tat d r` cho t e,r.r q. irs of .wo ste `o °es r'' d.evelo•'' only =the' f t 'part. .a, '.t pr c, s; n:;'o de ;: to'. p nex'. s i- n,.the Subject ro ert The t'`=' :roc e s 'wiY'1:,'r'e' ui:rer;•a l,`,a te'' 1ajPPYP.. q. . i iaroyalbtheH"ear n Examiner,,,:.:,-,,,'”,7.,P,J:Exairi ner_`:al,so=-`noted';'';PP Y g v.." several problems `relating`'to drainage, . acee`ss.'and`=f'utu'r:e;`:grad'es, I: The Examiner also informed Mr. ':Vo;l'c'hold, that ;;a- ,f:i:l'l 'permit 'would' JI be :r:e uired bythe. 'Bui.ldin Di_v,isi;on:i at'':the'.:,;time 'io`f buildinqgr 9'..' J rr' - rei1i = i iirmt':a cat oPp.P t•: J' s PN,a rl: f. r 1:a?; t„'^ f i' 1 i. R-:03:1 .77 , Pay e: Three.,,:,:,,,,,,.,:„...,.„.:,.,,,,,...,, . .,,,,,,,.:,.,,,,,,:.,,,..:.:. .,:.:: 2?.,:-', s' ' 6. The Planning Departmentreport„accur_a.t:el7.y;;set's_'forth the _issues ,:findings of fact., applicable "polciend; provisions: and• :: '' \` departmental recommendations', n'',fh 's' matter,'and', this`:=repo'r,t; itself, `- being -uncontested; is hereby :attached' a;s Exh 'b t:'#l,,,and: / 7.77p77771,..,:„::in this . report 'by' reference:''as,', t o! reafrth` Ari: ','fu,ll`:: `he. CONCLUSIONS . s t ': .n(d is iY . •:is ' appateritly . riont . d,1. The application 'request ris `zLarid« rconformancewith' :the; 'Com rehev _. 2 It is a aren t n.•re. iPpv ewin ,the' Com} `relien"s .v'e`_:' 1 g' p Land\:=Us'e'.>Paai'.'and' the exis. int z onin that tYig' e`:re" est•:;is'":`g q. r`,. 'c'ai,iaance' :with;.'<.; existing 'and future develo e ", ,,,.pm nt ,cjf"`manu fa`ctur 'n` :uses' i n-,'..triis - area. The • applicant,', s r.e ',rese'n}ta:tive.was`:=aw' - ' '' R are• :o'f:'.,:patnt; 'a yimprovements that 'wou.ldf:be're";ia. }eaq. r d:=ao'"''b.e°.;'addressed='``at the `ti me :of `s i te:P 1.an a P o. al i.; 1 i"i-RECOMME rION n' it h' Reco en dd .a' rov'al sub 'ect 'to 'tYiPP7 e•-,P°l•a n= ii D'e ``a ram'eng..'°::.. P, t,>:recomitiendations', {, ; ri..• ' ORDE'R DTHIth 'daYo .'APl ,a i!';..?:.: 0111P ' , , '2'.'.'''.'',,,,',.','.:'' i., , '.'' •'.-. ' '''' -,.'.- '•"':,.' • ,. ,''' '''.. r'-'::.!,:;[.-..',',...'.:je M. t'a dt: and:±=Use:' r rr 'E xamrie'r• 4: i A.,.. P.n. y'. ,.. M1_,e`:Y Ali, f+zicTRAN':SMITT ED TH IS` 5''. th da ;of^•A 1 9• 'b'.;::"Y'... P. r` eert .fed`,.'maih•:.;,to.; 4.y,e:'art:ies.0 cord' rf,.'a' .. . .. .. .' , . ::. i' '. .' 11 ., ::g; i2' - ' ti._.`,. ' t•.f.'::r:;„: l:• .,.': ..'.;•.,:i.<'.:`,..`:. , 14'- J 1 ':','ii';, sii.:,'.,j 1. Y- Y. °}:.% r' • : ;' 1 t..i i", G ar o l'Y cho 4. iPi''P[ Y s; r f f9'.T,RP;1V MI rST'I'ED T IS 5 h.t da `of• A P_. ': o g' . r.Qao ti,'..r C ha,r 1 e s'':'Ja: "DeY ent `::' C nou ci- 1 P s"re i c3e'n. G ea' .e.;err. P: g Y' c;o n`. C u c i loran R-ic `a',. h rd,'M': Stre,d= cke::." f' war x.•kli`C. `G onxi'sa o-n'' 'P.u',bl' -,` •W rk' r"`• ecto r fl,: iGordonYErikcic's`er r`' P'a ruin - e' r c:t'o'r'';a:5' on J smi thth ent' ` i e'c or' r t n c'l e` P ursu n J.•a t 0't Ordin an ec No 30 7. 1, eS c,t,ion 4>:re `ues`.t='''for ';.;;•:: : recons ideration or. notice of a ea=1.'':'mizst`b'e'`.'f l`ed:. before April` 12 , .'197.7.. ' An a rev.ed` e'ron;:`feel: nY9gP: y, tt-'6,;the decision of g'>,. the Examiner is based -on.,(`err O f, . procedures<' 'e'rro`rs ' ' ,.;':oii`eo ii ',_ of law or fact , • error. 'in judgment,, o.r' the d"isc,o.v;ery;r.`of_`:,`new .'e'vidence, which "could not .be reasonabl,y:'.a'vaila.b'le. a't:''t'h'e :'prior.`'h ae. r pg., :may.;'. make. a written request: for review` b " the. `Examiner: w 'Y,.t3i.in:>fourteeii`i'` 1.4) days. of the..conc'lusion of" .the'.hea- 'i• • `r: ri.`,,. Tl%is:'':, ii,,,, ue`s;t.;:sl a'Z1' setforththespecific, errors relied u `on'`.'b'." j`` P,. y :'ch.';,',;apPe'1'lart;';'a'n'd:.t-1e Exarriiner' may, after review of .the 'rr'ec'ord ,.take.'',fu'rt2er."„ac.t`ion as-:he deems proper. t• tv'S r jr•u:r'3% S'.`1,j.-C. }1x C INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Del Mead, City Clerk DATE : March 7 , 1977 FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance re Amendment to Comprehensive Land Use Plan - Ripley Lane Dear Del: Enclosed herewith is the original of a proposed Ordinance re the above captioned matter which we have re-written to cur with the findings of the Planning Commission. Please attached Exhibit "A"/ A IFVe4oKz_ GMS :nd e;e ;.rd M.Shellan Encl. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE-,, May .9; '1977. The Ways and Means Committee recommends second,:and. .final ;reading. of an ordinance rezoning certain property:,locate'd near. SW 43rd, Street and West Valley. Highway; known as the Anderson rezone, rezoning: from G to MP. The Ways and Means Committee recommends fi:rs.t' reading 'of. the following: 1 . . The Cable Television Ordinance:` 2. An Ordinance ,appropriating fundsfor:Work ,Study Program: The Ways and Means Committee recommends first, second and. final readings. of an Ordinance approving final assessessment :for: LED.#298 '(.i;f approved at earlier public hearing). Earl Clymer William Grant. Barbara Shinpoch y v • 1ii '_.!l. _t •• • • •• 14 1./ • h _ • • • 4-11 . 1 ' s 11 • ( i w 0 A A l Jo*2 jFt7 QNV Am od Q Nn o c 1.5-d. o o 1Z Itw. 1 ali'18 i h t so 1 ri a•I cti Ei I 3 4' aNZ1 H' A i is . I . Cf3 0 EIkit/ It I Z-tit..5 14 4 WEST' - VALLEY RD. • • Renton City Council 4/25/77 Page 2 Public Hearing - Continued LID 300 Sewers MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CLOSE HEARING. CARRIED. Olympic View MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN ADJUSTED ASSESS- Continued MENT ROLL AS RECOMMENDED BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. CARRIED. (Equalized roll 67,342.25). Motion by Thorpe that total amount of adjustment $8,000 be charged to Utility Fund, failed for lack of a second. Councilman Stredicke asked record to indicate his opposition to the LID, that it included a large majority of county property prior to annexation, that protest came from county portion which was eliminated thereby increasing costs. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR NECESSARY LEGISLATION. CARRIED. (8:30 p.m. ) CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all Council members, are considered routine and are enacted by one motion unless removed by Council action for separate consideration. Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Barbara Lansing to the Human Human Rights Rights and Affairs Commission for three year term replacing Clifford Commission Rost, who was appointed 4/4/7 and unable to accept appointment. Mrs. _ Lansing, 7271 S. 129th, Seattle, works with handicapped children. Appointment effective through 4/25/80. Refer to Ways and Means Commission. H.U.D. Fellowship Letter from Planning Director Ericksen requested transfer of H.U.D. Student Services Fellowship funds to the Planning Department Salary Account in amount of $2,050, having been authorized in the 1977 Budget. The letter ex- plained the University has advised reimbursement of 65% of the student's salary can be made semi-monthly; and further requested any monies re- imbursed from the University be credited to a revolving salary account, allowing the Department to utilize remaining HUD funds and provide for any deficiencies for student services for the balance of 1977. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later resolution adopted. ) Proclamations Mayor Delaurenti ' s Proclamation declared 4/24 - 30/77 as Volunteer Week. Mayor Delaurenti 's Proclamation declared 4/15 - 5/31/77 as Save Elec- tricity and Save Jobs, asking all citizens to curtail power consumption by 10% for the duration of the shortage. Anderson Rezone Letter from Hearing Examiner Magstadt recommended approval of rezone R-031-77 application from G to M-P manufacturing park, for applicant, John Anderson, R-031-77, to allow for development of the site which consists of approximately 120' north of SW 43rd between West Valley Hwy. and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission right-of-way. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Vouchers The Ways and Means Committee recommended Council approval for payment of Vouchers No. 13487 through No. 13679 in the amount of $286,568.88 having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or ser- vices have been received or rendered. The report recommended payment of LID #300 revenue warrant R-3 in amount of $5,810.96 and cash warrant C-3, $5,810.96. Council concurrence recommended. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA Approval AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Proposed Motion Letter from Planning Director Ericksen presented proposed King County by King County -- Motion No. 77-237 which is enabling legislation to allow cities and Joint Spheres of counties to establish joint spheres of influence. The letter noted Interest some merit in establishing spheres of influence, noting possible resolv- ing of conflict as in the case of annexations such as the questions raised by Mr. Radovich in the Springbrook proposal . The letter noted concern that the city might be inadvertently committed to unforeseen improvements or obligations such as the extension of utilities without prior annexation to the city. The letter also noted P-I article that King County is taking a more significant role in regional control and is interested in becoming a dominant government in the overall area; the letter noting the proposed enabling legislation would not appear to have substantial effect one way or another on effectuating such elements. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL REFER LETTER AND PROPOSED MOTION TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 25, 1977 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M.Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the regular meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President Pro tem; PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE, COUNCIL RICHARD M. STREDICKE, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, KENNETH D. BRUCE, WILLIAM J. GRANT. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL PRESIDENT GEORGE J. PERRY. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS C. J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; DON CUSTER, Administrative Assistant; GARY KRUGER, Planning Department Rep. ; WARREN GONNASON,' Public Works Director; RICHARD GEISSLER, Acting Fire Chief; CAPT. BUFF, Police Representative. PRESS MARK PELLEGRINO, Renton Tribune; DON SMITH, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 1977 COUNCIL MEETING AS WRITTEN AND DISTRIBUTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published CATV Ordinance and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to consider the proposed cable television franchise ordinance, hearing Continued to continued from March 21 , 1977. MOVED BY THORPE,.SECONDED BY CLYMER, 5/9/77 COUNCIL CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING FOR TWO WEEKS IN ORDER TO COMPLETE REVIEW OF THE ORDINANCE. Community Services Committee Chairwoman Thorpe noted committee has been meeting weekly to review input for proposed ordinance, urging Council members to review, particularly systems expan- sion and rate structure. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, posted LID #300 Sewers and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing Olympic View continued from April 18, to consider Local Improvement District No. 390 Terrace sanitary sewer lines , trunk lines and appurtenances thereto in the Olympic View Addition south of S. 27th Street and east of Benson Rd. Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason recommended final equaliza- tion of costs with City participation of Utility funds in amount of 4,500 and Current fund participation in amount of $3,500 for reduction from final assessment roll of $75,342.25, equalized assessment roll in amount of $67,342.25. The letter explained the $4,500 utility participa- tion represents a trunkage charge of approximately $.O1 per sq.ft. which will be recovered as a charge against other properties developing in the future and utilizing this sewer system. The amount of $3,500 rep- resents a reduction in the City' s charges for incidental expenses in connection with the LID, noting the City costs had increased $5,500 over the original estimate and that the equalized roll will be a 10. 19% increase on the properties included in the LID; that the City will be picking up 13. 08% of the total increased cost which was 23.27% over original estimate of $69,955.03. The letter further explained the LID was not charged a $.01 per square foot system development charge as the LID was commenced prior to adoption of the City's ordinance requiring such payment, with net result that when unconnected areas connect to this system they will be charged the standard $.01 per sq.ft. systems development charge plus the $.O1 per sq.ft. share of the trunkage for this LID, or a total trunkage charge of $.02 per sq.ft. The Public Works Director' s letter recommended approval , that this represents a reasonable compromise on the part of the City. Persons present making comments : Marion Folino, 1305 S.27th St. , com- plained of location of sewer connection T, lack of contact with home- owners when ditching across driveways, and discourteous flagmen. Mayor Delaurenti asked the Public Works Director to contact the contractor regarding complaints. Councilman Stredicke inquired re standards estab- lished by the City for traffic flagmen; Councilwoman Thorpe inquired of City inspectors on projects and was advised by Public Works Director Gonnason of the inspectors duties , that the City taking over contractor's duties will increase cost of LID's and increase need for more City person- nel . Gonnason explained reductions in individual assessments, which ranged from $200 to $2,000 on the 24 parcels included in the project. Norman Anchors, 1523 S. 27th St., reported loose manhole cover as dang- erous , having received no response from Police Department. Howard Christopherson, 10644 SE 165th, reported satisfaction with LID. 1: a A11 N'53 311VA . 153M 7 • Osbski Ft ft.% V 41 c 1 • 12. N A e. v% q H r - x • 0 .0 ,i ui 72Alfl AVE $. c , : 1 131-1 I‘" fzi es r • » 1 _0 44 t . v% 11S4‘. 8:• 1. T,.:'_:::.--..2'..‘"::'-...,.:---.....::-. '.:-- ,......• Z n A vj r • N .a L d 3 Sao. tit OrO 0 o Pv6 weTSouNDPo £g AND Guilt. 4 o n 51.14GWG7014 410=7444 2 . INTER-OFFICE MEMO - t^ UI TE'To:Gordon Ericksen, anning Director May 5, 1977 FROM: Del Mead, City' Clerk`. Re: Ordinance on Anderson Rezone - G to M-1 Please furnish new map and check legal description of the above-captioned rezone. This ordinance was on first reading May 2, and will go on 2nd and final reading. May 9th. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director DATE : May 2, 1977 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RECEIVED RE : Ordinances and Resolutions MAY 2 - 1977 Ordinance - Anderson Rezone CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS We attach n f, (s ) and/or Ordinances (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee. rUte * Date c 7 0 : W . Gonnason J . Williams D. Bennett R. Nelson D. Miller Cheryl R. Boughton T Alice M. Touma Ot er ROM: -' n-Lc— 1), E : Review and report back. See me . Route and return. Prepare response for my signature . 7g1Take appropriate action. Prepare special report . Set up meeting. For your information. File . EMARKS : I N T E R O F F I C E CORRESPONDENCE Date May 4, 1977 TO:Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Dick Houghton, Engineering Supvr. SUBJECT: Ordinance - Anderson Rezone In checking the attached ordinance as to form and correctness of legal description, we find the ordinance to be unsatisfactory. Section I refers to "the following described property" subject to rezone, and labeled Exhibit A. Exhibit A is represented as a sketch only, without benefit of a legal description. It would be up to the Planning Department to accept or reject Exhibit A in this form. AH:pmp A` N As(1 Jaye a REGE CIT`( of ROT° c; CLERK'S OFFICE\-,;„ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO : Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner 8910, „E : May 2, 1977 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk 13%1 4 , 1voz RE : Ordinances and Resolutions 4; ` 45t`\C'sc». en Anderson Rezone Ordinance AZ/ cON We attach P s..aJ. t.ian..(s) and/or Ordinances (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee. Advise as to covenants per City Attorney's inquiry. If none, we shall forward the ordinance for first reading tonight. INTEROFFICE MEMO DATE: TO: April 28 , 1977 Del Mead, City FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City. Attorney SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone Ordinance Dear Del: Enclosed herewith is the original of a proposed Ordinance re the above captioned rezone. We assume that there are no restrictive covenants attached to this . rezoning. Please attach the legal description. GErard M. Shellan GMS:nd Encl. j/ 7 INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: Del Mead, City Clerk DATE : April 28 , 1977 FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone Ordinance Dear Del : Enclosed herewith is the original of a proposed Ordinance re the above captioned rezone. We assume that there are no restrictive covenants attached to this rezoning. Please attach the legal description. GEr rd hell n GMS : nd Encl. Renton City Council 5/2/77 Page 4 Senior Citizen Councilman Stredicke noted his motion tabled 4/25 (Pa.3 'linutes) .referring Center & Water funding for both the Citv' s . water shop facility and senior center to Shop Facility the Administration and to the special (to be appointed) shops conunittee Funding to report back. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THE MATTER OF Again Tabled FUNDING FOR WATER SHOP FACILITY AND SENIOR CENTER BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL AUTH- ORIZE THE •MAYOR TO SUBMIT REFERENDUM 29 GRANT APPLICATION. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, THE QUESTION COUNCILMAN STREDICKE RAISED LAST WEEK BE TABLED UNTIL NEXT WEEK. CARRIED. Public Services Public Services - Aviation - Committee report submitted by Aviation Committee Report Committee Chairman Stredicke, noted that in Order to serve Aero-Dyne's Aviation new facility, housing administrative offices , flight school and Aero-Dyne Corp. maintenance hanger, three-phase electrical service will be required. Wire Undergrounding That Aero-Dyne has expressed an interest in underground installation ' City Participation if the City would be willing to participate in this project and it would elimina .e six poles and Overhead lines which have been a hazard to aircraft. The report further explained the project would be consis- tent with the airport' s policy of undergrounding new electrical facil- ities and previous participation with users along the new West Perimi- ter Road. The committee therefore recommended that the City participate with the Aero-Dyne Corporation in the amount of 50% of the total cost for providing underground service, not to exceed $5,000, which will be paid from the. airport construction fund. Councilman Stredicke explained tax dollars would not be used. MOVED BY BRUCE, SECONDED BY THORPE , COUNCIL CONCUR IN REPORT OF THE AVIATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL. MEMBERS BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE FISCAL IMPACT OF EACH PROJECT PROPOSED. Councilwoman Fiscal Impact Shinpoch explained desire to know cost of proposed projects in order on Proposed to determine or compare with benefit received , noting it would be Projects Required administrative to determine source of funding. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: CLYMER, BRUCE, SHINPOCH, THORPE; ONE-NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST FOR FISCAL IMPACT TO THE WAYS 'AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR NECESSARY LEGISLATION. CARRIED. Meeting Time Extended MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND EXTEND COUNCIL MEETING BEYOND THE 11 :00 PM CLOSING TIME IN ORDER TO PRESENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Ways and Means Committee report was submitted by Chairman ClymerCommitteeReportrecommendingsecondandfinalreadingsofanordinancerelating to special meetings of the City Council, (first reading 4/25/77) . Follow- Ordinance #3131 ing readings , it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT Special Meetings THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED setting second Thursday of each month at the hour of eight O'clock for special or Committee of the Whole meetings of the Council . Ordinance #3132 The committee report recommended second and final readings of an West Hill ordinance annexing certain property (City of Renton water shed) to Annexation for ' the City, known as the West Hill Annexation (first reading 4/25) .Water Reservoir Following readings , it was MOVED BY CLYMER; SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading of anAndersonRezone .ordinance rezoning property located near SW 43rd and W.Valley Hwy.R-031-77 from General .Classification District •G to Manufacturing Park District MP, known as the Anderson Rezone. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. T Ordinance #3133 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended first, second and Final Assessment_ final readings Of an ordinance approving the final revised assessment LID #300 Sewers roll for LID #300 in amount of $67,342.25: Following first reading, it Olympic View •was MOVED BY CLYMER, 'SECONDED BY BRUCE', COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS' DUE TO ACCRUING INTEREST. CARRIED. Following readings it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Upon' inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, Finance Director Marshall explained' City participation' in amount of 4,500 from utility fund and $3,500 from general fund. Upon further inquiry, Public Works Director noted no sewer lines were laid 'outside of the City. ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: CLYMER, BRUCE, SHINPOCH, THORPE; ONE-NO:'"STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED: April 5 , i977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: John Anderson FILE NO. R-031-77 LOCATION: Approximately 120 ' north of S.W. 43rd between West Valley Highway and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission right-of-way. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from G to M-P , manufacturing park, to allow for development of the site as per manufacturing park district requirements. SUMMARY OF Planning Department : Recommend approval. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 22 , 1977 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on March 29 , 1977 , at 11 :25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was 'reported that the Hearing Examiner and Mr. Gary Volchok, representing the applicant , had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Plot Plan. Exhibit #3 : Assessor ' s Map. The Examiner asked ifMr. Smith had additional information or exhibits to present. Mr. Smith reported he had no further information to present. The Examiner asked Mr. Volchok if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was : Mr. Gary Volchok 16 Park Place Seattle, WA 98101 Mr. Volchok indicated his concurrence in the report and had no further comments . The Examiner asked Mr. Volchok if he was aware that while the application is in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan , an M-P zone requires site plan approval which must be submitted in R-031-77 Page Two a separate application to be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. He also questioned Mr. Volchok about the drainage problems on the far eastern portion of the property. Mr. Volchok reported that he was aware that site plans must be approved, and that drainage would be accomplished by utilizing the Burlington Northern right-of-way. The Examiner noted that access from the property would utilize ' S.W. 43rd Street which will be widened in the near future and is a heavily traveled street, and asked Mr. Volchok if he had considered alternative access points from the property. Mr. Smith indicated that S .W. 43rd Street is a secondary access with the West Valley Highway being the major access road for the property, but detailed site development plans had not been drawn. Mr. Volchok reported that a two-way left turn access is being designed on the north boundary of the property in coordination with the Truckweld facility. The Examiner inquired about the existing grade on the property. Mr. Smith reported that the site would be filled eventually, and this process would change the elevation and grade. The Examiner informed Mr . Volchok that a fill permit would be required by the Building Division at that time. The Examiner questioned Mr. Volchok on matters relating to zoning designations of surrounding properties , who indicated that he anticipated that businesses now located on S .W. 43rd Street would eventually correspond with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Examiner expressed concern about these properties maintaining a common access point, and indicated that these aspects would be addressed during site plan approval. The Examiner asked if there were further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on Item #R-031-77 was closed by the Examiner at 11 : 40 a.m. FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter , the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1. Mr. John Anderson, owner of the property, was represented by Gary Volchok who spoke in his behalf. 2 . Mr. Volchok indicated that he has reviewed the Planning Department staff report and concurs in the staff findings. The request is to rezone the 6 . 9 acre parcel of property from G to M-P , Manufacturing Park. The application request concurs with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The property was posted and there was no apparent opposition either written or spoken. This property is one of the last few remaining parcels fronting West Valley Highway that have not been zoned M-P. 3 . The application request agrees with the latest Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan document which was adopted by the city in June of 1976. 4. Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 as amended, R.C.W. 43. 216 , Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible public official , has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance for the subject proposal. However , actual development of the site will require further environmental review. 5. The Examiner stated to Mr. Volchok that the rezone request is only the first part of a two-step process in order to develop the subject property. The next process will require a site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner. The Examiner also noted several problems relating to drainage, access and future grades. The Examiner also informed Mr. Volchok that a fill permit would be required by the Building Division at the time of building permit application. s ' R-031-77 Page Three 6. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues , findings of fact , applicable policies and provisions and departmental recommendations in this matter and this report itself, being uncontested, is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full herein. CONCLUSIONS : 1. The application request is apparently uncontested and is in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2. It is apparent in reviewing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the existing zoning that the request is in compliance with existing and future development of manufacturing uses in this area. The applicant' s representative was aware of potential on-site improvements that would be required to be addressed at the time of site plan approval. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval subject to the Planning Department recommendations. ORDERED THIS 5th day of April, 1977 . ors Air -s L. M. . •.tadt and Use -. ring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of April , 19 by certified mail to the parties of record: Gary Volchok TRANSMITTED THIS 5th day of April , 1977 to the following : Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071 , Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before April 12 , 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures , errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 29, 1977 PAGE TWO RE : JOHN ANDERSON , REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-031-77 , G TO M-P 2 . Soils : Puyallup (Py) . Permeability moderately rapid. Soil is used for urban development. Newberg ( Ng ) . Perme- ability is moderate . Soil used mostly for row crops . Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo ) . Permeability is moderately slow . Seasonal high water table at or near the surface . Soil used for row crops , pasture , and urban development . 3 . Vegetation : Site consists primarily of scrub grass and brush . 4 . Wildlife : Existijg vegetation on t'he site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : The site may experience seasonal high water at or near the turface . 6. Land Use : Subject site is presently undeveloped . The proposed Truckweld facility is located directly to the north . Puget Sound Power and Light Company right-of-way and Burlington Northern right-of-way are located east of the subject site . Several older single family residences and businesses exist south of the property along S . W. 43rd Street . West Valley Road and the Green River border the westerly edge of the site . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : Area consists of a mixture of undeveloped land , existing industrial uses , older residences , business uses , and transportation corridors . The older residences along S . W. 43rd St . , however , are, located in an existing B- 1 business zone . The area is in a transition from resi dential and abandoned pasture land to industrial uses . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : Existing in the area are 12" water mains along West Valley Highway and S . W . 43rd St. and an 8"" sewer along Puget Sound Power and Light right-of-way . Storm sewers are not available . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . Any further development of the site will be subject to City of Renton standards . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route No . 150 operates along West Val - ley Highway south of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The site is within the Renton School District. 5 . Parks : Several city and county parks and recreational areas are located near the subject site . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-725 , Amendments 2 . 4-729G, General Classification District 3 . 4-730 , M-P , Manufacturing Park District I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June 1976 . 2. Land Use Report , 1965 , Industrial , pages 11 and 12 and General Development Plans , page 16 . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 2 9 1977 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER AM PM PUBLIC HEARING 7,s,9,t®,1Ia1211o213s4154 A MARCH 29 , 1977 EXHI I I ld. N'V. APPLICANT: JOHN ANDERSON XFILENO: R-031-77 REZONE FROM G TO M- g EM ®"3/- 77 4 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from G to M-P , manufacturing park , to allow for development of the site as per manufacturing park dis- trict requirements . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : JOHN ANDERSON 2. Applicant: JOHN ANDERSON 3 . Location : Approximately 120 ' north of S . W. 43rd between West Valley Highway and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission right-of-way . 4 . Legal Description : Legal description on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 6 . 9 acres . 6 . Access : Via West Valley Highway and S . W. 43rd Street. 7 . Existing Zone : G. General Classification District. 8. Existing Zoning M-P , Manufacturing Park ; B- 1 , Business in Area : District ; and G , General Classification District. 9. Comprehensive Manufacturing Park Land Use Plan : 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chron- icle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Subject rezone is to allow for planned construction as per the M-P district requirements . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The general area has been historically known as Orillia . Portions of the older community lie directly south of the subject site . The proposed Truckweld manufacturing facility is located directly north of the subject site . The site is situated within the one hundred year flood plain of the Green River. E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level and is generally lower than the existing level of West Valley Highway . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH' 29 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : JOHN ANDERSON , REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-031-77 , G TO M-P J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezoning of the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However, eventual development of the site will alter existing ground levels as a result of filling of the site . Storm water runoff and traffic will increase as a result of eventual development of the site. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Not applicable . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declaration of Non'-significance has been issued for t'he sub- ject proposal (see attached ) . However, actual development of the site w-ill require further environmental review. M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and site map are attached . N, AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Engineering Division 2. City of Renton Utilities Division 3. City of Renton Building Division 4 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . 0, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject rezone request is compatible with the manufacturing park designation of the Comprehensive Plan for the area . 2 . The applicant has, indicated that the portion of the site that is adjacent to S . W. 43rd St . will be used as an alternate access to the main portion of the property . 3. The proposed rezone is also compatible with existing and anti - cipated developments along West Valley Highway. Site plan approval of specific development plans is required within the. M-P Manufacturing Park District. 4 . Environmental impact on the subject site and adjacent property , including the storm water runoff, noise , glare , air pollution , etc . , will be reviewed in detail prior to approval of any site development plans or pre-loading activity. 5. The subject site is also within Shoreline Management jurisdic- tion , and a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Per- mit will be required for specific site development . 6 . Utilities are available to the subject site . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of rezone request from G to M-P. The M-P zone classification is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan , existing land use , and existing zoning within the general area . All development , fill , pre-load , etc . , will be subject to review under the M-P zone and Shoreline Master Program will be reviewed in detail prior to approval of any site development plans or pre- load , etc . I , 6 I i v,, / i i s., 0 1 I , I yl „ I .. - — -— is ------- --- -- i/ ii 131II I a ., i (/ I 1 16 I: a i B Pi W Ir I y 1 I I I J o n' I WJ' W I I y r i I tilla tit, , 1 Air A1\ I r 1r III i , tip 1 ' . 1 113— '_T. 1 '3,V..•t S Ili•'-!T I1W. I I I I r 1 ! L - J 1- ::.?s- -•+ 1,I I Q REZONE : JOHN ANDERSON ; Appl . No . R-031-77 ; rezone from G to M-P ; property located West Valley Highway between S . W. 43rd Street and S . W.- 41st Street . 7 APPLICANT JOHN ANDERSON TOTAL AREA 6 .85 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS West Valley Highway EXIS"i ING ZONING G EXISTING USE Unimproved property PROPOSED USE Construct a machine distribution and service center for a construction equipment division of Star Machinery. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS PROPOSED/FINAL DL__ARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/t -SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-031-77 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-222-77 O FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests a rezone from G to M-P , manufarturinq park, to allowfor development of the site as per manu- facturing park district requirements . Proponent JOHN ANDERSON Approximately 120' north of S.W. 4-3rd between West Valley Location of Proposal Highway and Puget Sound Power and Light transmission R/W. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to have 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title P a in Dire for Date March 22 , 1977 Signature l City of Renton Planning Department 5-76' AFFIDAVIT I , „T0440 A'IDP2Q,J being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner. of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me 774 this 2.i ay of fe4 19^7-7 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing atkwela iff4i- L. Vow Name of Notary Public) S gnature of Owner oo 2 cue St% cscil) O)'- /C2O`/o Address') pcd /dress) 1 474 i')is tz( P , c il A) City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to rough and complete in every particular and to conform to the ru lA3ncR: e ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the 'fi, i ignxpr\\ Lffh/o lication . C) Date Received I AAP 3 1977 , 19 By: v N11//fr7NG DE.? Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON Of' R42' REZONE APPLICATION RECEIIJED PEAR 3 1917 For Office Use Only: APPL. NO. Jr - a 3/- - 7 PLANNING COMMISSIONgTION FL FEE; RECEIPT NO. //`/-.5 / APPEAL FILED IVG DES FILING DATE CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE 3-..2q-77 ORDINANCE NO. & DATE j ec: X/a . 0 gpoo pig= pufee APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 41 98101 1. Name pacp, 41,9frif ¢kg. ow, eft phone 6Z2-. 71% 2. Address c). 3O OOyo Br4Rialpl 'f; U-' q d/c 3 . Property petitioned for rezoning is located on L. WTI(ex between Lj 4'/3 af' and s L.) f 4 . Square footage or acreage of property A- g 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach separate sheet) L ers /A, ST 4 61 ALL Go 01-7-eb /& 3G - 23 0 '! 6 . Existing zoning 4 Zoning Requested NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. Ap,v4,47)fi77tt l. ype. e ,Ppvi er- 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. , c 7,,'1 " ft4' J, 9p r y : - p pc"" f # J ... 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? At A-is 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 2-73 AFFIDAVIT i • 4041-) P !?to being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this Z Ira of peg l97-7 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing atkree0A /f AO i L. Vo 1 1 f/ G Name of Notary Public) S fgnature of Owner) boo cfie. --sY 9 (3( - /e,®y Address') 1 Address) 44 ')OS i'zir De / 'tk? s, 14,#) City)State1 2'L — 7/ Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION Phis is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to onform to the rulesc-fI ulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filfi o Ap.6 pplication . 1`- cal Date Received f ( a 19 By : h. off - 44 41 Renton Planning Dept . qG T3E 2-73 r • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTONf1C//:i:28ENVIRONMENTALCHECKLISTFORM MAR FOR OFFICE USE ONLY pP R'( Application No. Environmental Checklist No. 4fg/- „7„7a- 77 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance Ei Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. . ' The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now., with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may no.t apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent 1-1#4 rAireL tcAlz-t L- \/V tc,iwr 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 6,00 --- pyrre.K pi4cc 5*—e cs L-•-®s /P/v 7-102. 6 /3 -0 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist r•-i 0,00-swt. /. o.®s04 Apt- 5. Name of prrooposal , if applicable; 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : got- co/Al Aft 7..2j000 pL() s ,rVO0 O ceirotc.6 vI L $J/ MI /A Ct,uD IcaJ ,, ""Dto 01'" Orp/C fl C®"'rrec,cpv"-) el,Wo 14.e r' r 'D/ Vis/ 0I Q f M ' C4/ //Vv'' , crot7exi ft) I DyeP1- L•$1- c Af/ A', 41 l P 1) , 07 C 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 4- , Z r 9 17 G0c47'& ? t? /c f cm fie, uic//¢, l ' — c.eerp sc, I ego f--o U/x4n,144. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : • 2-- /& nor 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : t j "v, CO u Port -- /LO COgsrPeL G® L U 4.1 s t, per4'n Pit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain : yE3 --. - -c,p .o a s ( D"9 a "So.9— L4 -O po5-( ) t pe L4- e° us, 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: D 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: ftc'oo . cc.p.sq-pc/1._ 77 ,. ir-jet.L . QOrcD/Adj I' II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? Fizz of S'TL"" YES MAYBE NO Die,timA Fyffe: c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE 0 d) The destruction , covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . YES— MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , . either on or off the site? Y S MAYBE 0" f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition orerosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay , inlet or lake? TB--- MAYBE N Explanation : 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? Y MA Y B-E Kb— c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 3) Water. Will the proposal result in : a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ON S, " a vo rI,rem t C 1 $-YES • MAYBE NO Rid( c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?a YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE •NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality„ including but not limited to temperature , dissolved oxygen or t.urbidity? YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the' direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate , phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE Explanation : 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,`,. microflora and aquatic plants)? 7' 1Z(I14-v.s? ) It04SS fePG/r I YES MAYBE W-C to) Reduction of the numbers 8f any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? DES MAYBE 'NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or in a barrier to the normal replenishment. of existing species? G4,,"o,relINg YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of /any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in : a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish , benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES M YBE 0 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: PA) if p Itt irgy cfc/, Gam,! 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or yr glare? YES MAYBE W Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of. the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 9) Natural Resources. Will the, proposal result in : a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO • b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal, involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri - bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or • create a demand for additional housing? . YES MAYBE NO Explanation:Po l 1,00 IAi d p 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a) GeneV(ew/onkor;SadditionalJ5alNvehicular YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? 0,4 Sprig p4retcp.41 pow, YE RPTE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? Yam— MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE \NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MATE. NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MA NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require . the development of new sources of energy? YES M YB N0 Explanation: 16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for. new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? YES MAYBE NO d) Sewer or septic tanks? YEAS( MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO f) Solid waste and disposal ? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: '1, - IQl- 0/41 'p 77 r / jtn 'C 'I LC. e Q U I I t -- US e c' ette# dam' rite irg au?€•• 17) 'Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open t.o the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation.. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 1II . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information • is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. 2i Proponent : i ned) V0Lcgo ame printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 NOTICE OF PUBLIC fiEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINERATHISREGULARMEETINGINTHECOUNCILCHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 29 1977 , AT 9 : 00 A .M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . REZONE FROM GS- 1 AND S- 1 TO R-2 AND R-3 ; file No . R-028-77 ; property located on Monroe Ave . N . E . between N . E . 6th St . and N . E . 4th St . 2 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-031-77 ; property located on West Valley Highway between S . W. 43rd and S . W. 41st. 3. SITE APPROVAL IN B- 1 ZONE ; file No . SA-032-77 ; property located between Shattuck Ave . S . and Whitworth Ave . S . immediately north of Houser W a y S . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 29 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A .M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED PLANNING DIRECTOR UBLISHED March 18, 1977 CERTIFICATION I , Michael L . Smith HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 15th day of March 1911 . SIGNED r.l-c.,44t. NV R , THE CITY OF RENTO N z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 980550 4 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04 _ 0 235-2550 T D SEES March 9 , 1977 John Anderson P. 0. Box 10040 Bainbridge Island , WA 98110 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-031-77 Ge'tlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted theabovementionedapplicationonMarch3, 1977 Apu:lic hearing before the City of Renton Hearing ExaminerhasbeensetforMarch29 , 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be- pre-sent . All interested persons are invited to attend thehearine . If you have any further questions , please calltheRentonPlanningDepartment , 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director By : i M chael L . Smith Associate Planner wr cc : John Rabel - Gary L . Volchok L' 1 11 INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO-: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1.-- -- BUILDING DIVISION ENGINEERING DIV _ A, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION UTILITIES D r I ' FIRE DEPARTMENT '1 HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT W1L_ 4 1441-144 Contact Person iRE : 4. . A.,4,• .Ap-.s . i A i Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal lid return it to the Planning Department by 3 1- 77 with your written recomme dation . Your response will be included' as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT if4ell,tit.421 Date 3 i77 i k ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department III Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) 4 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Z Z 77 ; Application No . : /R-03/-77 Action Name : Jd41 46844,5014 gGZpvle Ce0A4 9 'fib M-p Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : 3077 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : i7C-.D ‘ Comments : 77b , ..sp-i/vte.ilii- __....e,.„:"ece.-eY1 G:.m G 41:.--fre,..g-c•---- 3 i Cl>7 Signature irector or Aut orized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ZE:yzr„ ikU r,,iu Comments : v tr2,/ p G ,/ 2.n-eLf 4242, J 1S -77gnatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresentative, Date 6-76 OVER) i l REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : j ,Department : 0-LIB s /P,I (,c wets Comments : ArJ Lp 3//e _27 Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative Da y REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :ZZI2L2J-- W_____ omments7l Signature of Director or Authorized Representative r Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : l,< 1%G E //G//vsE /A/ Comments : cA,V7 2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date V1 EW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date