Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA78-253J V p ' V' 0 1'G W e6N.< ',j E c • , Azy i El f i 6 ca t I u g ti ‘ Np .{ H IG Nl.ANPS 0 rill c'), :-,, t , Y/_ 10 4 9A K CP t.. cN 41'.• e ' t '' '.iireca,,,,,,,, u. t b 8 4 s•t.ar>s. l 1. 7 I szb i0ill N,;., les gisz4 B SF S; IS/8 SaBB o 7 why:: :+, ,,L7/ o IA trft,-- .3,0):::::.:i.aitim '6,.NO 11°4 4 Leg' Z 1116:3 twitx= 03 BiSDO VIP14. r.. sl t... ly 8 azt•azs. 81 B inJes : ; ..!,: 10,N Mai < El 1.1211 1 IYIL 8 5 1 21.A g JILL• N IN wElDIM H l z ,yoz a t,I, zn Q 8 a 1 8•5 , 33 a in) U.B133z, 4IV B {1IIC1A.:":ka*.1-4: N I/ 1 i ,. 21 vi132 Nrf hill EL.........„, •I*. ''' Lb 8N.,.9 0 i g CP B ' a Tbsipf3 Bf. I raw& . 111 ] B . 1 . N. 1Z`" 0 x 4"`` Il r-......_. wwwww••• N. 0Jr-r4I r LARRY Howe RExoNE: a-23S 7B PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TQ HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 APPLICANT: LARRY HOWE FILE NUMBER: R-235-78 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST : The applicant requests the approval of a rezone from R-2 , Residence Two Family District to R-3 , Multiple Family Residential District. This to permit construction on the subject site of two proposed duplex units . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : LARRY HOWE 2. Applicant: LARRY HOWE 3 . Location : Vicinity of 1501 and 1517 Jefferson Avenue N. E 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : 22 , 170 square feet 6 . Access : Via Jefferson Avenue N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning : R-2 , Residence Two Family 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : R-2 , Residence Two Family ; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was property published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The purpose of the request is to provide zoning consistent with the proposed multiple family housing . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was part of the original plat of the City of Renton . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography: The site is generally level . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 6-15% slopes (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries , row crops and for urban development. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : LARRY HOWE , FILE NO : R-235-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : Some deciduous trees are located near the western property line but the majority of the site is composed of lawn grass . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land Use : The land use of the site consists of two existing duplex residences . All adjacent lots are developed with duplex units . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The 'site and surrounding area consist almost entirely of duplex residences . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : Six inch water mains run north-south along the west side of Jefferson Avenue N . E. and east-west on the south side of N . E . 16th Street. An 8" sanitary sewer runs north-south on the east side of Jefferson and a second 8" sewer extends east-west on the south side of .N . E. 16th . Storm drainage is not available to this site . 2 . Fire Protection :. Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #142 operates along N . E. 16th Street within 500 feet to the north of the subject site . 4. Schools : Hillcrest Elementary School is within 1 /8 of a mile to the north of the subject site and McKnight Junior High School is within 1/2 mile to the west while Hazen Senior High is within 1 3/4 miles to the east. 5. Parks : North Highlands Park is within 300 feet to the north of the subject site and Kennydale Lions Park is within 1 1 /4 miles to the northwest and Kiwanis Park is within 1 1/2 miles to the southeast. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-708; R-2 , Residence Two Family. 2 . Section 4-709A; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report ; 1965 , Residential , page 11 ; and Objectives 4 and 6 , pages 17-18. J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Rezoning of the subject site will not have a direct impact on the natural systems ; however , subsequent development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . However , through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: LARRY HOWE , FILE NO ; R-235-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE THREE K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Approval of the rezone and subsequent construction of the proposed units may result in additional social interaction at the site as well as the surrounding area. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been prepared for the subject proposal on the basis that this is a rezoning only and that if further development of the property occurs , further environmental review can be made of a specific development proposal . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of medium density multiple family for the site. 2. The existing zoning in the area is predominantly R-2 with intersperced R-3. The subject proposal appears to be consistent with the existing R-2 zoning in the immediate proximate of the site. Ordinances 2285 ( 1966) and 2313 ( 1967) are facing Kirkland N. E. , and Ordinance 2314 ( 1967 ) on Index , are previous R-2 to R-3 rezonings . In 1977 an R-2 to R-3 rezoning was approved on Index to the west of the subject site subject to covenants including 5 ' landscape screening on north and south , 10 ' landscaping on east, and landscaping adjacent to the buildings to the approval of the Planning Department . 3. Existing uses adjacent to the property are duplexes or low density multiple family in character. Two single family residences are located to the east across Jefferson Avenue N . E . 4. The proposed parking layout is consistent with the design and landscaping requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance ; however, the proposed plan has not been thoroughly reviewed as a part of this proposal . 5. The Utilities Engineering Division advises that the water and sanitary sewer facilities and storm drains may require enlarge- ment. Regarding water, the Fire Department will require adequate hydrants to be installed . 6. ` In its review, the Fire Department advises that for this type of occupancy the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code will have to be satisfied . In addition , a 4-foot walkway for access to each building is required . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : LARRY HOWE , FILE NO : R-235-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE FOUR 7 . Density calculations for the area indicate that the west side of Jefferson Avenue N . E . west to Harrington show approximately 7+ dwelling units per acre. The east side of Jefferson Avenue is somewhat less than 7 units per acre. The applicant' s proposal for the subject property would result in a density of 16+ dwelling units per acre. 8. The proposed rezoning is located at the middle of. an area that will eventually transition from the current low density multiple uses to a higher density ; the Comprehensive Plan recommends that residential communities be "protected---from unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolecence" (Land Use Report, Objective #1 , page 17 ) . The proposed rezoning appears to be premature at this location. A similar proposal at the immediate fringe of the more intensive uses to the south and east, however, would not. P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend denial of the rezone to R-3 for the subject site based upon the following : 1 . The availability of suitable utilities and adequate storm drainage facilities appears to be in serious doubt as per the Utilities and Engineering Division comments . 2 . The proposed density of the subject proposal would be more than two times that of the existing density of the adjacent properties . This would not be consistent with Objective 4 , page 17 of Objectives in Land Use Report , 1965, which states : Protect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents , and property owners , through the effective control of land use and the enforcement and application of building and construction .codes . " 3 . The preponderance of R-2 zoning and the almost universal development of the area with two family residences would seem to have established the low density character of the area . 4. The existing R-3 zones in the vicinity appear to be spot zones and these do not appear to be consistent with responsible and effective comprehensive planning . (Land Use Report , Objective 6 , page 18. ) If approval is granted , it should include the requirement of site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner with 'adequate safeguards to insure a compatible living environment. All utilities should be required to be installed to serve the site , and the existingdwellingsbeupgradedtomeetallcurrentcoderequirements . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Q Public Works Department'') I/I Building Div. 4k Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description) 0 Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: , Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his deli nee) e vmou4 DATE : (0//e1/6 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : REZONE 1Z--'7 'Te MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE G / REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : LL Ma Approved Not Approved Co ments or conditions : Signature of ctor or Author'ifed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7—jA5 4pproved I Not Approved Comments or conditions : f66- " J- S /'"//cV /"L.i Gvi e/ / .//e 7" D 71-,C iC6Q /evU . 1.1,S Q"',e_'C T--3 ai C/•"C. roic CMG Gu/NG • l% a<" rUU u/ /L/G Cc. j .t/GC/]E1) F/.2. A CG.G s . :`u /Li0G5 4_, / /7P1 Signature of Director or Author'', ed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : aila Approved E Not proved Comments or con itions : Adj a e,e .t t eX I$71i ,q a,Whys of Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : urtLirtrs cm Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : e cTkL C." waT 1-4 Trrc=rtaso,y sL.oac-urs oNLi up°o GPM 4 STO. i4 /C1' wAT d 517u). Sepr-CA•kr1 1-1 ri To.rt d 5/5 lzc Q FOR. a AG-64 131r1)C2. 1e)-2o -7fr Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Approved .. = Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative - Date I ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ' Q Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department is Building Div. 0 Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. T4 Utilities Engineering . Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) 04(v 4i' Jis SUBJECT: Review of ECF- A 16 ; Application No. : 0~ j 7 Action Name: .I O`J qtrt:',-,J,---A) 415 415; Sun r9 4 (( Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : u91 og; Note: Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW . BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment :ic.i)C Approved Q Plot Approved Comments : Le.,-, ( / a- —72 Signature of Di ctor or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : i--/ L' E Approved 1'ot Approved Comments : MGtS l it-ite2 _7: S.G. '/, fLe-`c) t -!i' `i/?G` //`7/Ji2/l/c/7 O!2 /i%l:Jielr,t. ". 4'S ` e r„ /3, /I,S% i"I1,:y% 22-lQui2-rc%v7S e' L/r C° /6 s 7-7/G a c u'/7 A/c y. /c' fa 677 /itIcw/4-1/ ivt.,=-0E6 /c-/l,„c rfi 2i,Gc fr,DG'S- 4=--,--1/,,:—...._ )6 //c/7,1 Signature o Director or Au horized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY. PEPARTMENTS: De artment: MilimentErov ed fNot roved 9/6 S.43,pive.e. t. 4dj a a eKl`` xi ci4w9 ,../d w s are s,n7 57‘0 rr 7-4/L_. 6/24/7e • Signature of Director or Authorized R presentative • Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: kfriurna 5 C4 Approved . Not Approved Comments : p(gg:t—•• 0-17-7XSignatureofDirectororAuthorizedRepresentativeDate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : mments : Approved O Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : LJ Approved I—j Not Approved Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 7 PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No. R-235-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. 396-78 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Proponent Larry Howe Location of Proposal Vicinity of 1501 and 1517 Jefferson Avenue N . E. Lead Agency City of Renton This proposal has been determined to 0 have xn not have asignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment. An EIS 0 ispisnotrequiredunderRCW43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance : This declaration is for, rezoning only and further review will be required at the time of specific plan approval . Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency wouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title Planing Qirect Date October 31 , 1978 61/41r.WSignaturejcA/ , ,ems„ 1 onPlanningRDepartment 5-76 IY" AI L a 4)11r,I1 w.7 W` ''.c1 1 Z34 241 23e , 2 Z5 _1_ an. ZSM eT i a 4s,s N.sI4, • 11\ \ I o,; I l'1'l'i f:1f. f,19" '1 .• I. I._....:J L--- I l" '" — ' , 1.:(f •Iii'i'{ I,;'i MINK fPirre 1' (11 ., 1(`{—1{ _-T — : I TN 5T I,j ._1 JI N S.•x24TH ST, f ) W..- 2;4-.,,,f .a ±•' 1 14 • Z53 242 235 224- I- l l o, 1 -•/ tIIIF'---{ C 7Q\T•' W* , t. ^14, n WI f'f f •I. ii I• -11 N ! lAAp_q ._ li t >.; ,+ - ' f 10-1--Z- I...L ._ i 4 Sr ti /' 'I 1,fills. ... f • ni • I, 1_ _1 y _ N ,ff;v — s: q. i,I'• .1 w1QI. 1 :i, 7200 . • , I W: . J) N ;. 3 q'."-ltll 11 f 1-• ,'I'o1'. :d.• 'I. 01 52_ 243 2134 225 r•' 2 n _•.1:-*. i.— 1 1 ! I L.i F s 1'I-._ f >, t. •11'" sf s. , If „) I • j OTH. 5T. 0 ! .I s i. In r O "I 11 WPM1 -PFh44 20B {.f,Llj•1. 1. 11 i•, 440 Eel- j pail s t L T + ..11, H )T f .• 1 1 t I ] l a 74 rc _ t 5A ` • Li • o r• s I I . I 1 r05 f e '1 j J I 1 r......_..'- — --- 1 i f! e' ' mil 1 , 21l _ I { 1 I poI- 4• " .I 4-4 11 - I^ 249 Q 246 231 1 228, ZQ3 210 _ F, 1 casIs- I J W . )) . b l 2,_._. Ili: ^ .,,) 48 > 47s a4> . '—' _.__— _ I _ / ...- —r__ 1 1 1--- ICI R-3 1 i, •• R . i c"-r- I • 4 TyE y,` 211 i. z ° . f. nfo v i .. ._- L ` _ i._, ' d, s• Y, Y ire l D..'\F. • JHu 20 LLfLt I` a 2, al f} M1 ' 4 I W-t- 1, 11 r5'T l' l/)_ 4va r 7f N E-_ 12 5T I ` \, j^1 1. 1 I 6 • _L) 1--.._i J /t7 43 1 p1R..3 , .` t r. ' I!1 J N411TNP 1 N E" pP I 40 t 1 4 r-{ {•- ; bU: IIII •1; 1, • 1-- I \ 1 N 55 // 1 > N E 4k,a _r ,1 •N,. I,I IQ j 1 1 f1, i tom .el • , • 1 16 J 1 _ ^1 e I. • ''It,-? /3:. I' .,1. .I 'to,. ,.'.a : .Ii. W T I n '- i .f> • • N.E I • Pl. f 0#3, •11-•1 l . N -_ 4, -'. 4 r 4 1 f'• •I sI{' f1! • Z f f 7Tl. 1 rr5 ' tqr` -•4r- .- ";i -1 , , , I '-1J1 , el •T'' fiJ a .-{? •ji3 { J •, If 35 a lr'f. i W t•II is_{•s.•:I_.I "!i S_• a nE • 1 4'. E of tEOMT. x 1 \ n - z o •0 fY•I 7 1• tE. 1 e T. • .e 1 R _ _ • •' '•':-:..,.I"1 r--'+ ,Lrl.l.:a.:.•, - --•. _ • , e ' L I ,- ; ••!• JI. r;, • ,; I, 4-_:. IT}TT,. i Iilf,1 II'-yI•11T' ,. G i • 1 r 1 t1:1 I 1"1• ' 1 .'.1•.1 I i'1-1'• e l- 1• i,..•, Y II IrITI Ill yT/!FY .' -''' 33 ( 3z a f•I" l I. '1ti Y 1•I_ • 1/'. .. • n t• .F i,L.LL^t.. E. .:'DM__• slit .._...„ LARRY HOWE ; REZONE FROM R-2 , RESIDENCE TWO FAMILY DISTRICT , TO R-3 , MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT File R-235-78 APPLICANT LARRY HOWE -TOTAL AREA ±22 , 170 sq . ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Jefferson Avenue N . E . EXISTING ZONING R-2 , Residence Two Family EXISTING USE Two existing duplex residences . PROPOSED USE Construction of two proposed duplex units . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family COMMENTS OI R. THE CITY OF RENTONy1.),MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 oGM= CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ob• - 235- 2550 P TFD 3EP'- Larry Howe Suite 1 108 Factory Avenue North Renton , Washington 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO R-3 , FILE NO : R-235-78 ; property located on Jefferson Avenue N. E. between N. E . 12th Street and N. E . 16th Street. Dear Mr. Howe: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on October 10 , 1978 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for November 7 , 1978 at9 : 00 A.M Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Plannin 9irecto / By: David R. Clemens Associate Planner cc : Townsend - Chastain and Associates, Inc. 409 South 3rd Avenue Kent, Washington 98031 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 7 1978 , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . JACK A BENAROYA COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ( PHASE 2 ) , File SA-216-78; property located on north side of S . W. 41st Street between Longacres Parkway and Lind Avenue extended . 2 . MICHAEL TURNER , AGENT FOR MR. AND MRS . JOHN BANCHERO AND DR. AND MRS . ROBERT FLORER , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3 , File R-234-78 ; property located on the south- west corner of N. E . 12th Avenue and Edmonds Ave . N . E . 3. ' LARRY HOWE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO R-3 , File R-235-78 ; property located on . Jefferson Ave. N . E . between N . E . 12th Street and N . E . 16th Street . Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department . Li ALL INTERESTED :PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED October 27 , 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION STEVE''MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY - THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, on the 25th day.- of October. 19 78 SIGNED A;i5Lif 34,6004.0.1 1 1\ • k 1' q' CITY OF RENTON) WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM" : ' a 1 1.• 1+ aa 0; ; .F R OFFICE` USE' ONLY Application' Not:?.: ..'. .: .-'-- fa1: Environmental;:Checklist :No. . ' e/'--Jz _ 7,_ PROPOS- date' FINAL, date. Decl;arati.o,n •of, Significance ODeclaration of Significance . . nDecla•rati;pn.•,.'of Non=Significance ,® Declaration of Non;-Significance . •• , -' C• OMMENTS•, Iintroduction.'' The State"Environmental 'Policy Act of 1971, 'Chapter''4'3.21C', RCW,- requires ' . dll state. and- local governmental agencies ..to consider environmental values both, •for 'their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.':' The purpose' .of this', checklist is to help ,the agencies -_invol.ved determine whether, or not a proposal, is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information . presently 'available to you. ,Where explanations' of' your answers: are required, or,:`where,,•. ..:-:::,, you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers',•.'include= your'- " ' explanation in the space provided, or use' additional pages if necessary.. , You .-:should ::+ include, references ,,to any. reports. or ,studies of, which you are aware and which are rele-;-,';;:. ,'.' . ', vant to the answers you provide.' Complete answers to these' questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal . to. undertake. the required environmental, review with- out unnecessary delay. i • The following questions apply to your total' proposal , not just to 'the •license :for which you are currently applying or the 'proposal for which approval is sought. Your. an,swers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is c'ompleted, .'• even though ,completion may not. occur until sometime in the future. This :'wi_1•1, allow' all ' . -• of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- • ' ' o.ut.duplicating paperwork in the. future. , NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local. agenc'ie_s:in 'the-,State, of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . I'f a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on' to 'the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND . 1. Name of Proponent' 4 ht/ / 1/D We iur 2.' Address- and phone number of Proponent,: 18 . ACfor•,:, AVv. NO, , Sc i re' / ke.nnoe , WA 9&®55 3. ' Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist c_//G/ ®,' < n// 5. Name of proposal , if applicable:. 6. Nature and brief, description of the proposal (including but not limited to its . . . , size, :general design elements,- and other factors •that will give 'an- accurate understanding ofits- scope .and nature) :' 77a ac/c/i 71/o l l a I •. .2- Sk, , dz•!p/ ' apa rime ivi '.. '. o'ld/,ia py'J a pave ,o a r i4 rr . /o : r ce t used e. /e 4s tr ocf d 04 a 2, /7 so, "I 5/ z, ,r! l e. dU es. tGM/rrpf ) /thy pa Pit/ c i i1LJe-$:'Nl7'i ' 2- 7. 1:ocatioin• 'of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the 'extent of the' land area affected by any environmental impacts, ,including any other, info;rmation needed, to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental 'setting'"of the proposal ) : 77; Si re is 0/9- /op or a /ow ridge ,, • 6/ack 46 .-,, , M1e Corc&G/e d !;///- ®c /eera_7424 ,941A le yids s/r,ed 710 teas' ; aid 4, aivrh p} .4 S a/l.,/ Vide. Eye.s74. 8. :S;E`•stimated, date for completion of the proposal : i4s'::,-soon as pass/ /6 9. •List of• all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , t, sitate and local --including rezones) : Ci ' Di 7fernor1 • Cp,DrOVal O/ P'&2®r18 4.p/JJ1 a/10 i Q4S lrnpc 've14 IS p/a/Ls 10. :Do' you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity r,elated: to or connected with this proposal?' If yes , explain: , NO 11. Do you know of 'any plans by others which may affect the property covered by' your proposal? If yes, explain: HO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- ' posal ; if none has been completed, but is• expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in. changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions,• displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? pYtMAYBE d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . J, • YET— MAYBE NO . . e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MMAYBE' NO f) Changes in deposition'or erosion of beach sands , or. changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed -of.the ocean .or any bay,- inlet: .or.,lake? . • • • . ' YET MAYBE Explanation: • • a J4d?' a41/7, i/e S 41 46- 4/' f iial /al B vi/I G vec ,'-Jte s , l. 3- 2) '.'':Air. Will 'the proposal „result in;. - ' h: A`'•,(a) Ai sremi.s.sion or- deterioration of ambient, air uality?9 • PEA MAYBE : • 1-- #v:.(,b) ;The creation of.' objectionable odors'? t; Vt MAYBE: F.,(c) - Alteratln:o '.'of air movement, moisture or temperature., 1;: or•any change .in .climate, either locally or• riTi~,.. regionally? a M*77 MAYBE 0 a',,. Explanation: ' t, 3).' Water..'' -Mi.11 the proposal result in: . fJ a) . Changes in. currents, ,or the course of direction .of water',movements,• in either marine or fresh waters•?. E MA B N b'),': Chang.es;;in absorption rates',- drainage patterns; or;,':'` the :rate' and amount of surface water runoff? A' -terations "to ,the course or flow of flood waters? , X ' YES MAYBE NO td)'`. `-C:hange.ln -°the amount,of•.surface water in any water, bo'dy?' Y ':.: MAYBE NO e):.: bischarge into 'sur'-face waters,' or in any.alteration r" `:•'' surface water' quality,, including but .not limited to • t•- temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?' • „ . - ' Vr MAYBE N f-).: Al:ter.ation'of' the dir'ection',or. rate of flow of ground waters? ' ' - .V MAYBE' NO': : Chan e_:'in he uantit of round 'waters, either i ''through direct additions' or withdrawals , or through inter•cept.ion, of; an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES-:-.. .. MAYBE -NO . _ - . h) Deteri orati o'n I n 'ground water -quality, either through direct .injection,' or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne' virus or bacteria, or other s.ubstances.'i,nto the ground- waters?YES MAY 1,) Reduction .in .the .amount of water otherwise available for- public water supplies? YT: Explanations, 4) 'Elora: Will..the.proposal result."in: ' i a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any' species', of. flora.. (including,,trees, shrubs,. grass, crops, , . . m.icrof.lora and aquatic plants)?T: .AxYb b), , Reduction e Of the numbers of any unique, rare or ndangered' species of 'flora?'' into an,.area,`',o r.I ntroductlon•`of.':new-'species of flora in i 'barrier .to the. normal replenishment of existing'_A:." sP4_@ 1@ S?4AY B crua1 o`1cut t rarofanioiiin p.Reduction Ydecacreage9, Explanation. 5). Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) `:+;Change,s! in the .diversity of species, or numbers of any species •ofrfauna (birds, land, animals including . reptiles; fish. and shellfish, benthic organisms , ' 4: insects;or microfauna)?X • YES MAYBE NO b). _'Reduction of,.;t.he"numbers of any unique; rareor 5 e.ndangered species of fauna? .• YES MAYBE NO • c`) .:;Introd_uction of new species, of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement I.; ::'of fauna? Yt MAYBE NO d) 'Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 4'',";'.'•''..- ( F YET.S MAYBE .N O Explanation: 6).. . Nn-ise:' Will . the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE' NO Ezpl•anation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the ' present or planned land use of an area? M NO . Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: . a) Incr..ease in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE: NO -. b) ' Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES • MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, 'oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of 'an accident or upset VIT- MAYBE N Explanation: . 11) . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population . of an area? YES i F- E xp 1 a n a t i o n: 4 a,18 7`AA nAov,.. SA,p_e- %l b ' . .S 9 4.1C/card/-fly all - i 74c IA4 o v ca 1/ et.rya M cd9A -Me. der?s/Y y Dr1 • 1c Is i¢e /7 se/' wi// /ric.re ase , 7.5- 1 ) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or . A. .. ., create a demand for additional housi6g? YES MAYBE NO Ex pi.4:n a't-i on:., 77,6e - tvorosa/ my( provide 74;up- • . • add/AO/7a/ hvrill tiro/5 . A. • , i••:. ,„yc• . ,,,,.. .:., t. (0) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: fi? ' - . a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? • X YES • MAYBE NO • b) : .EffeCts on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?X YES MAYBE NO t)L,impact .upon existing transportation systems? YES ' MAYBE N i• (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ' .. . . : ' ',. .; . • movement of people and/or goods? X... YTS— :MAYBE NO e)... Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X TO— MAYBE NO f) ' Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YET— MAYBE NO 1, Explanation: 1,./ehicedei le- /ra 11¢ /4 ma 1., mcrei J-1 L., Tarr-F-to9 7/14i,6 r t 1 rles will M /41,p/toyed- - • 14) 'Public: Services. . Will the proposal have an effect upon, or ., result in .a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? : YES . .MAYBE NO Xb) Police protection? YES - _MAYBE NO . c) Schools? ''''!: : : -. •', . ' YES , MAYBE..,-NO •. . d) . Parks or other recreational facilities? . . YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance: of4ublic fac.iiiiies . including roads? . . •X .. a ip-c YES : MAYBE : NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: 15) Energy. . Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts, of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) - Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require • ' . • the development of new sources of energy? - X • ra— . MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: ,. : :. : ..--- .• a) :Power or natural gas? TES MAYBE NO .NO - ... b) Communications systems? - YES MIT. NO- c)- Water? : A - YES . MAYBE NO. 6- d). •Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO , e)":',:Storm water drainage? YES.._ MAYBE N\- • s,` f) ,• Solid waste and disposal? Iy YES , MAYBE NO" Explanation. i ,' 11)' 'Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of " • airy"%health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding ment.dl health)? PEA.. MAYBE N Explanation; 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of : any. scenic vista or view open to the public, or will - the proposal,_result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive " site open to public view? YES • MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the' quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? - YES M YBE NO- Explanation: 20) 'Archeological Ristorical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical A, site, structure, object or building? C YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , :the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this. checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: gne 4' i name pri, ted City of Renton• .. ' Planning Department 5-76 T Th).\\\1; AFFIDAVIT p N N1N,C: La /"r/ L . fEwe. being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of th 197 ` , Notary Public in and ' for the State of Washington, residing at yL. gr" Name of ipt,Zy Public) J Si Lure o • Owner CAddress) Cddress) City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 4,:,,70 0 ,\ „, w,v, , , .: : „..„ CITY OF RENTON A iR'• 'I 'yes t U ' fig 8,.: _ . Fb REZONE APPLICATION: ': a FOR OFFICE 'USE ONLY C' Ui ..--."'-. ' LAND USE. HEARI N ,p '‘, '``-” ,... APPLICATION, NO: c,/'7X ' EXAMINER 'S: ACTIO ?. APPLIEATION;'" "EE $°O S c-o APPEAL FILED i G P RECEIPT NO. 7/ CITY COUNCIL ACTION: E Fi'LING`'•'DATE,;'''ft' ,i,iO/D/,P 6ri,,i,lu/0 :ORDINANCE' NO.. AND 'DATE µ,,l• TEARING DATA; l :' PPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS. 1 THROUGH 10 : L Name Zarr;y Oyve Phone 25'5 '/e8 Address; /.0 ca4k,ry Ave• A/o, , S'a,'/ / ; Rerl/04 u /A.--..,.'.98055 • ' 3' ' Property;''petitioned 'for rezoning is located on e.44rSoil '-AVe• /11 . . between /t1E /2 ti Y. and . NE. /lo ' 5/. I . Square footage : or:: acreage of property 2., /7D 41; : Legal descriptionI, Of property (if more space is required, attach a . separate' sheet) s 4o . /D 0 // , ' B/vet; 4! , Correc ieS D/Rl o, - Av's ors //q, /a4d s' Vo. 2 J, "'as ‘ recorded in Vol.' 57 off' P/a/s Page 92 , kecords; t ' .°:I e /ein9 - CaurlSy l Weis%,49 Ikon . i . Existing Zoning R-2 Zoning Requested R-3 1 TOTE TO 'APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in 'reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiat;.', your request 'may be attached to this sheet. (See Applicatioc. : Procedure Sheet for specific requirements ) Submit this . for; ; in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Adp/k k aparfineivl OGf//d/lgs '7dit ) /-sfor. !: 61Ql9,5 ara 6.-is1'hq and' 71wo add;/Tone/ z.:- sfncy a/,cgs ', are Proposed. 3. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact-On the surrounding area. e : 15//ng dirk ' ?ark/n9 : area !s 710 8e :cep/aced //7% , vpw d N IV 1 . How. Soon after.• the. rezone is granted, do you intend' ,to develop':the site? ; i - ; S s 'ch' ' ag' AD55;6/e Two copies ,of plot ,plan and :affidavit of, ownership are required P1anning.'Dept'.'' 1-7 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER NOV 7 1978 PUBLIC HEARING AM PN 7a8e9tl0illo12011121314151( NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 APPLICANT : LARRY HOWE FILE NUMBER: R-235-78 EXHIBIT NOITEMNO A. SUMMARY .OF REQUEST: The applicant requests the approval of a rezone from R-2 , Residence Two Family District to R-3 , Multiple Family Residential District. This to permit construction on the subject site of two proposed duplex units . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : LARRY HOWE 2 . Applicant : LARRY HOWE 3 . Location : Vicinity of 1501 and 1517 Jefferson Avenue N . E 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : 22 , 170 square feet 6 . Access : Via Jefferson Avenue N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning :R-2 , Residence Two Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-2 , Residence Two Family ; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was property published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The purpose of the request is to provide zoning consistent with the proposed multiple family housing . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was part of the original plat of the City of Renton . E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is generally level . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 6-15% slopes (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development. 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : LARRY HOWE , FILE NO : R-235-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : Some deciduous trees are located near the western property line but the majority of the site is composed of lawn grass . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: No water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land Use : The land use of the site consists of two existing duplex residences . All adjacent lots are developed with duplex units . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The 'site and surrounding area consist almost entirely of duplex residences . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : Six inch water mains run north-south along the west side of Jefferson Avenue N . E . and east-west on the south side of N . E. 16th Street. An 8" sanitary sewer runs north-south on the east side of Jefferson and a second 8" sewer extends east-west on the south side of N . E. 16th . Storm drainage is not available to this site . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #142 operates along N . E . 16th Street within 500 feet to the north of the subject site . 4 . Schools : Hillcrest Elementary School is within 1 /8 of a mile to the north of the subject site and McKnight Junior High School is within 1/2 mile to the west while Hazen Senior High is within 1 3/4 miles to the east. 5 . Parks : North Highlands Park is within 300 feet to the north of the subject site and Kennydale Lions Park is within 1 1 /4 miles to the northwest and Kiwanis Park is within 1 1 /2 miles to the southeast . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-708 ; R-2 , Residence Two Family. 2 . Section 4-709A ; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Land Use Report ; 1965 , Residential , page 11 ; and Objectives 4 and 6 , pages 17-18 . J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Rezoning of the subject site will not have a direct impact on the natural systems ; however, subsequent development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . However , through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : LARRY HOWE , FILE NO; R-235-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE THREE K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Approval of the rezone and subsequent construction of the proposed units may result in additional social interaction at the site as well as the surrounding area. L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been prepared for the subject proposal on the basis that this is a rezoning only and that if further development of the property occurs , further environmental review can be made of a specific development proposal . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of medium density multiple family for the site . 2. The existing zoning in the area is predominantly R-2 with intersperced R-3 . The subject proposal appears to be consistent with the existing R-2 zoning in the immediate proximate of the site. Ordinances 2285 ( 1966 ) and 2313 ( 1967 ) are facing Kirkland N . E. , and Ordinance 2314 ( 1967 ) on Index , are previous R-2 to R-3 rezonings . In 1977 an R-2 to R-3 rezoning was approved on Index to the west of the subject site subject to covenants including 5 ' landscape screening on north and south , 10 ' landscaping on east , and landscaping adjacent to the buildings to the approval of the Planning Department. 3. Existing uses adjacent to the property are duplexes or low density multiple family in character. Two single family residences are located to the east across Jefferson Avenue N . E. 4. The proposed parking layout is consistent with the design and landscaping requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance ; however, the proposed plan has not been thoroughly reviewed as a part of this proposal . 5. The Utilities Engineering Division advises that the water and sanitary sewer facilities and storm drains may require enlarge- ment. Regarding water, the Fire Department will require adequate hydrants to be installed . 6 . ' In its review, the Fire Department advises that for this type of occupancy the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code will have to be satisfied . In addition , a 4-foot walkway for access to each building is required . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : LARRY HOWE , FILE NO : R-235-78 NOVEMBER 7 , 1978 PAGE FOUR 7 . Density calculations for the area indicate that the west side of Jefferson Avenue N . E. west to Harrington show approximately 7+ dwelling units per acre. The east side of Jefferson Avenue is somewhat less than 7 units per acre . The applicant ' s proposal for the subject property would result in a density of 16+ dwelling units per acre. 8. The proposed rezoning is located at the middle of an area that will eventually transition from the current low density multiple uses to a higher density ; the Comprehensive Plan recommends that residential communities be "protected---from unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolecence" (Land Use Report , Objective #1 , page 17 ) . The proposed rezoning appears to be premature at this location. A similar proposal at the immediate fringe of the more intensive uses to the south and east, however, would not. P . PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend denial of the rezone to R-3 for the subject site based upon the following: 1 . The availability of suitable utilities and adequate storm drainage facilities appears to be in serious doubt as per the Utilities and Engineering Division comments . 2 . The proposed density of the subject proposal would be more than two times that of the existing density of the adjacent properties . This would not be consistent with Objective 4 , page 17 of Objectives in Land Use Report , 1965, which states : Protect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents , and property owners , through the effective control of land use and the enforcement and application of building and construction codes . " 3. The preponderance of R-2 zoning and the almost universal development of the area with two family residences would seem to have established the low density character of the area . 4 . The existing R-3 zones in the vicinity appear to be spot zones and these do not appear to be consistent with responsible and effective comprehensive planning . (Land Use Report , Objective 6 , page 18. ) If approval is granted , it should include the requirement of site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner with 'adequate safeguards to insure a compatible living environment. All utilities should be required to be installed to serve the site , and the existing dwellings be upgraded to meet all current code requirements . ROUTING SCHEDULE FQR APPLICATION TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department Q Police Department Q0PublicWorksDepartment''')2 e 6 Building Div. 0 Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description) 0. Traffic Engineering Div. 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: . Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his deli nee) f t.g,t/t.oul4( p DATE : (Ofi1f PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION I FOR: . REZONE tZ ?l- /G/ MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT l WITH ANY. COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE U1 D7 Z REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ?/-D_ C 01 Approved Not Approved Co ments or conditions : 40,0,45e.. 44 , V,C0--/X---7e 1" Signature of c r or Authored Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : `T J,' Q'Approved 3 Not Approved Comments or conditions : p'C l/y> %, W 7 /1",C /264 e,,, ) Ma S? /"I 5` / c:4ei f,e:i (7L-`3 clime G/.Ac. ioil 7,u 7- /G OC&u/NG T ee'c! c / UU ' e-/c-v cec-'l`/ •<- c-e/) ) f;Z- 4c fs S 5 eU00: z. c... ..C:--(7 j 16 /ir /7.P Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative Date9 J REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment : QM Approved LjergrOpproved Comments or con itions : 2te ara-Afree.- 4,7- rix.e..142" ;x. a-vx-44.114„. AdjaaG.-eII &Xi$71/ iWhys err. S'm /c $747 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY .OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : uTtt_rigs Approved Not Tpproved Comments or conditions : GX'C11-C. Co.° wAT H Jisersrsec0A4 so0bc_1,75 ©NL/ te,00 GPM t STD. uTl6.Ira 5 GI-kG'S. /4-/1:3' WAT J. STILL). SCPI_r.isTvz Mrrrt_rt d 5/5 IZr c . roe rac.I,4 t3l.WCa. IC90L( • 0-20 -75, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : p Approved p Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Fipance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department 11, Building Div. 0 Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) vwo O e ouit464oZgJt SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 4' 16 ; Application No. : ' —1 , Action Name : .4 krAui,i !f4wu Ao6 4K Muii Ii 4 ((At- Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : 1 lg:2 Note: Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW , BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : l,Uki)e Approved Ei Not Approved Comments : 37o Asy ;i : -ate451" ru Y:-gam ( 4 d'/ :- d Signature of Di ctor or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1L / cL C Approved got Approved Comments : vjGt S / /"/ 6-7---- ...2: 5:6: /"//Cli roc/ Gc.l 7N" f</2 /1%/Ji2/' 7 Oft ///i / e6 J// 6, rl u S i r/ % el4'4,/•2 il;-/75 af- u r C. /oft iris 7 T5 OC c u'ri/VC /. /'a rc faa/ /ti/i6-/cw/1'/ ivAcOc/J F,r -c (2f#K_/2/..c fric‹..c-4 7: ' .06 -..:(____"..„ 17'2 0 k/7e Signature o Director or Au horized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department : dprimerfiktrovedtbleO7. 1 1172.4 c1j44ere,4x/s4iwl Altai/doe S art. 5,noVe S D 1_ mizeAr- Signature of Director or Authorized R presentative_ Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : LIMA-nn/ 5 OW Approved • Not Approved Comments : 12f-j.kr 4-1-efrorri " 4- Kg/C-f 0-z7-7k Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department : ommentsApproved 'Q Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Deartment : Approved Not Approved Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No. R"235-78 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. 396-78 X FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Proponent Larry Howe Location of Proposal Vicinity of 1501 and 1517 Jefferson Avenue N . E. Lead Agency City of Renton This proposal has been determined to 0 have x(7, not have asignificantadverseimpactupontheenvironment . An EIS 0 isisnotrequiredunderRCW43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c) . This decision was .made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance : This declaration is for, rezoning only and further review will be required at the time of specific plan approval . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency wouldwithdrawitsdeclarationofsignificanceandissuea (proposed/final )declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title laning Direct Date October 31 , 197841 Signature. Fi 4 ,. nton PlanningRDepartment 5-76 1 ,1•, a iii::;-: t..l 1 I I ° y '1,' , err L54 1 241 23.. , 2 23 .' 25Tw eT.I I v t jn w 1 H I 4.. 11 . . l- i'\ \. _ . ------- I__-__- 1 1 .... , .', j',;, a.•;',.NHL a 1 ,,, ` j ITM5T , 1 W--T— { I i N,E 7.' 247. iT. 1 ,. (' j L '` rc 6N; 2340 6 11 253 ?42. 235 224 . 1_,` t ._.. IilF TC lc,°', . ' 11 .'t'• f—i a:.-4.4/:_:::,... 1'...11,',V.f.. 0l1 •.1:.'! IFo- i' sith21341El1_ 1_I I. 1'-tYi .1'''if th, w'i __._F7. ,, Q T-.--- N a5 r,In Imo,,72 ® Q" f ( I I I_ ' t I'•• "c 11 '1 nrt `1,j°',.In I 225 f' _ .:.1-,, aF"-1 I I I I Li_._y_, } R I a W t' Jo}}}''' J C'{ j JIl r E 2oTH. 5. O` , I. " bo 00r i;! N r 1 2.1zl', v r vs- 4lN E 2or+cT'' 19/' 1 1 . 1. li '1 I 1 I.. •',T,YA...6i Wf,ri °t'b64 i P, 5.1 251 iedl 244^ >ILw ali3 20B I.IN I'i i'' I. , ','. is . 0 jL/_ ,,, 114e1t)Eel'a ate a I F 1 y d„ > 2a '.,Rei::' © 214 . 209 ; t , . Iii I , ii ' a Q•1 i, `© t , T IT. . . . ' I , 04r5Tn_____ A 249 a taro 231 228 2J9 I 210 tf -a '; 24s, H ° ;Plii j:'4 t ° *.+'_' 0 ii rFS _ --_ Tr2Ar•.:` Z. s_ _4_ T 11T , 0 1 lll—. r 1, NJ i ha fr ;1 e ' pR µ ° ptV , I. ; iItf. iT ._ ii t NI Pa z S 1/I•!_ _/ N E. i I 40 t LW. •1 1q 4-, ,_ h ? t` 7 1 N.E 10^,PL. Z ' 1 ON1.j r. N.E ,yam y Irr y w 35 6 J'a laa._-_'-L 411.3 L_ t s 1v. r- 35 ''a 9'•ii e LIa,.E 1 h E' 'o , u°, R. ' > • n ' , a\ Q I1,• L i1.1 ti„Jn• I N 5T.7 L sT I ` 9s . - _ 93 I' 32 a f„ J t,: f 41,i„1„r..1,1 r•I,.I., f 11,1' " I'{L ,.. 1 ,•1'r A.ll_ r III .F • N E oTw_• 5?:_....... LARRY HOWE ; REZONE FROM R-2 , RESIDENCE TWO FAMILY DISTRICT , TO R-3 , MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT File R-235-78 APPLICANT LARRY HOWE TOTAL AREA ±22 , 170 sq . ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Jefferson Avenue N . E . EXISTING ZONING R-2 , Residence Two Family EXISTING USE Two existing duplex residences . PROPOSED USE Construction of two proposed duplex units . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family COMMENTS J 0 6 , 4 i U 1 AZyr 1 yr kr 1". S r•. .. ; 7; 7, u 4 w .,.: r n " I' e A, J t 1 NQf4• l M IC NI, ANP< . 0 1 ile I pA K . . '.. c,°‘<) 4 qcb ICi' lk CC) pi A. 1 c), OD lj B B r 4, 40, 1 S. f. RAS. Ati: gA gisz• i lisi. ti os F Z 0 ISIS e s ro, A _ 1 crA % ,_. t...... i.; Qqii 74 gist. 3 Eg lz 116 4 j:. 1::*:,:• i. 1:•':::::'::.:::::, 4, A r,--_-,,, -,.-.,, to,- R.:... t...' s.. 1 , r: 1 iffrgl Z ‘,, i , 4„ 3 1.,........ ii. ir. RF, ttf'. 1. 4., is. , ...,. -,. , 146 6131' F° f1 4 il le it c„.. 744 i 21:,- • 0 8 0 0- r, ,'``, 7 `, NMM' l 2 1U3o1yz H a _ 0 Ne i Lim• fr 11z. Dig ta .. t. M. a sr° oivez z B 5 i iii± 63 i 0 e its t33z QL 1414 a 4„..,*. r3„... is Pri 19 13a INK era 8 r 11; CC NA e 408 ` V. I i N y6 8 i g [ 13CS) 4 vairiv, B ; , F4 B i " 4.* 1 r'''' I. 0...." i r........_____ 4' i i•. , 4.. ED LAPRY !/ oeve- REZo tic. R- 2 3S 78 R-235-78 Page Two Mr. Chastain reviewed uses of higher densities located in proximity to the subject site such as existing North Highlands Park located just north of N.E. 16th Street; Hillcrest Elementary School located adjacent to the site; McKnight Middle School located to the southwest; and an unimproved special use area located south of the proposed rezone and north of N.E. 12th Street which he felt indicate support of higher density on the subject site. He noted the intent of the applicant for development to only one-half of the allowable density and indicated that control of density as well as mitigation of potential utility problems can occur through :review and approval of a specific site development plan. Mr. Chastain advised that a precedent has been set in the area for the requested zoning by the city, and the request is consistent with designations contained in the Comprehensive Plan. He indicated that because the intent of the city is to protect the investment of surrounding properties in the area, revitalization which would occur as a result of the rezone and subsequent construction would greatly improve the area and increase the value of surrounding properties. The Examiner requested testimony in opposition to the request. There was no response. Mr. Clemens• reported concern that approval of the rezone would not necessarily assure the city that development would be limited to the density proposed by the applicant if the property were subsequently sold. He also indicated that timing becomes a crucial issue in consideration of the Comprehensive Plan and location of zoning categories, and he felt that the subject request was not substantially surrounded by similar zoning to provide an acceptable situation. Mr. Chastain maintained that the city possesses the authority to review development and use of the site. The Examiner entered the following exhibit into the record by reference: Exhibit #4: File No. R-015-77; Stanley D. Wolf, dated March 21, 1977 The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department. Mr. Clemens reported that the recommendation contained in Exhibit #1 would remain as submitted. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No, R-235-78 was closed by the Examiner at 10:20 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of 22,170 square feet of R-2 zoned property to R-3 to permit construction of two additional duplex structures. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been superficially reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. Except for the staff recommendation there was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity, but may have to be enlarged,' depending upon design of the structure. 7. The Comprehensive Plan indicates the property to potentially be R-3, Medium Density Multifamily (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 8. Directly west of the subject site and across the 30-foot wide public use area is the closest R-3 zoned area. This single lot zone was reclassified in 1977 Ordinance No. 3144; R-015-77) subject to the following conditions which were placed in restrictive covenants: a. No building permit shall be issued for any new construction on the subject site unless the existing duplex is removed from the site or remodeled to existing City of Renton building code requirements and designed to be compatible with any construction on the site. Exterior design shall be approved by the Renton Planning Department. November 9, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Larry Howe FILE NO. R-235-78 LOCATION: Vicinity of 1501 and11517 Jefferson Avenue' N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests. approval of a rezone from R-2, Residence Two Family District, to' R-3, Multiple Family Residential District, to permit construction on the subject site of two proposed duplex units. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Denial RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive covenants I' PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on November 1, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted 'a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened• on November 7, 1978 at 9:55 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King 'County Assessor's Map with Zoning Designations Exhibit #3: Conceptual Site Plan The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Bob Hickox 409 S. 3rd Kent, WA 98031 Mr. Hickox indicated his nonconcurrence in the report. He referenced Section P.1 of Exhibit #1 which indicates doubt of availability of suitable utilities and adequate storm drainage facilities to the site and reported that discussion with representatives of the Utilities Division had indicated that proper building design could mitigate inadequate water flow to meet Uniform Fire Code requirements. Mr. Hickox felt that other comments provided by the Utilities Division regarding standard utilities charges and installation of separate meters for each building did not constitute disapproval, of the application. Referencing requirements for storm water drainage, he advised that a percolation drainage system or roof drains could be installed to mitigate the problem. Regarding allowable density oh ,the site, Mr. Hickox reported the applicant's intent to develop 16 units on the site which would be approximately one-half of the maximum allowed and would provide a gradual transition to the surrounding area. He surmised that the proposed addition ofrfour units would not affect the density average of the surrounding block of eight units per acre, over such a large area. Mr. Hickox reported that three previously approved rezones are closely grouped together in proximity to the site and projected a trend towards higher intensive use at a higher rate than the surrounding area. The Examiner requested. further testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Wayne Chastain 409 S. 3rd Kent, WA 98031 . R-235-78 Page Four A. No building permit shall be issued for any new construction on the subject site unless the existing duplex is removed from the site or remodeled to existing City of Renton building code requirements and designed to be compatible with any construction on the site. Exterior design shall be approved by the Renton Planning Department. B. A detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of application for a building permit for any new construction or remodeling. Such landscape plan shall include, but not be limited to: 1) Provision of an architectural-type screening fence together with a minimum five-foot landscape strip along the south and north property lines. 2) Provision of an architectural fence together with a minimum 10-foot landscape strip along the east property line. 3) Provision of additional landscaping adjacent to the buildings and throughout the site. ORDERED THIS 9th day of November, 1978. iougt11P- L. Ri :eeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of November, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Larry Howe, 108 Factory Ave. N. , Suite 1, Renton, WA 98055 Bob Hickox, 409 S. 3rd, Kent, WA 98031 Wayne Chastain, 409 S. 3rd, Kent, WA 98031 TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of November, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before November 27, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. R-235-78 Page Three b. A detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of application for a building permit for any new construction or remodeling. Such landscape plan shall include, but not be limited to: 1) Provision of an architectural-type screening fence together with a minimum • five-foot landscape strip along the south and north property lines. 2) Provision of an architectural fence together with a minimum ten-foot landscape strip along the east property line. 3) Provision of additional landscaping adjacent to the buildings and throughout the site. 9. In Exhibit #1 the Utilities Division of the Public Works Department stated that storm drainage facilities were apparently not available. The applicant testified that on-site retention facilities could be constructed. 10. The predominant land use in the vicinity is duplexes per the existing R-2 zoning. Some single family structures exist, two Of which are located directly across Jefferson Avenue N.E. from the subject site. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is a general guide to land use decisions • Section 1.II.1, Ordinance No•. 2142) ,' but the goals and objectives offer more detailed direction for these decisions. These goals and objectives appear to' support reclassification of the property to R-3, subject to developmental , conditions (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . • R-3 is reasonably close to shopping and schools and Sunset Boulevard ' (page 11, Residential, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, July; 1965) . The R-3 has , been anticipated and intended by the Land Use Map designation of Medium Density Multifamily for the purpose of motivating renovation or replacement of existing duplex structures (Conclusion No. 2, Exhibit #4) . This would not ". . .contribute to premature decay and obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns." (page 17, Objective No. 1, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . The ". . .orderly growth patterns" envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan seem to be, for the existing transitional nature of the neighborhood to be directed to R-3 whereby existing ". . .decay. . ." would cease. A rezone to R-3 should enhance the property values in the area (Ibid, Objective No. 4) and ". . .promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability. . ." (Ibid, page 18, Objective No. 6) . 2. A clear direction for land use has been established in the neighborhood of rezoning to R-3 (Zoning Map) . Four other small areas of R-3 exist in the neighborhood. The most .recent instance (R-015-77; Ordinance No. '3144) is almost adjacent to the subject site and sets a further precedent that is pertinent to the subject application (See Finding No. '8) . It appears reasonable and appropriate that this precedent be continued which would provide the applicant with the alternatives of improving the existing duplexes to current building code requirements (if the structures are nonconforming) or removal of these duplexes in order to develop the property according to R-3 requirements. Circumstances have apparently not changed since adoption of Ordinance No. 3144. 3. This neighborhood was created for housing during World War II (Exhibit #4; Paragraph D, Planning Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, March 8, 1977) and subsequently annexed into the City of Renton in 1946. Rezone activity began in 1962, perhaps as a reflection of the transition within the neighborhood to more up-to-date housing needs and land use trends. The adoption • of the Comprehensive Plan in 1965 adopted this trend (See Conclusion No. 10) . 4. R-2 and R-3 zones are compatible with each other, but the conditions listed in Finding No. 8 enhance this compatibility and mitigate any adverse impacts that may occur (page 17, Objective No. 4, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and ,conclusions, it' is the Examiner's recommendation that the City Council approve. a reclassification of the :property to R-3 subject to the following' conditions being implemented in restrictive covenants prior to Counci Lapproval of the rezone: r l IL A.s w . i 4 7200 1• .I. M•1• i4:,i=_::JS. J` -_..... '~• y____ =T— ;.• _ j` ` . . TG2OOL •• ' • L• la•.- 1 ar r- r-t , : • • .W •Ire • c`,, 1 : rt.r i_ tD, ••• 244 r - • ., • by toe i,t'1, 1,1 III jar/, r ,y., 404.r,..itf..+• a -' • . i . • 3-L , ,V P I L• , r)q 1 L l II l L.:12.17 • :}I • !• j. era • . • 1 r..........rr MI' G$P61-----' se i ;:; 11*, 430. ....1 t46' LaT- 7?C d2^ (..'1; 2 t • as •• / •r ,.K. 4.R1 i as e•/ 4.‘Y.— --X . • ‘— .--•lr :., •:"0.i ' '. G-1p0 ."4, • .!•, .r..,-;;.. 7,/".- N416. -21 .i 1 R •, S ii= c :,1:.: ....,...... . ,.,. : 6 :-" ,!.. 6 i ,-: ,...:7,- ',`, C// b• ' Ill i t-3 1 i 1' • 1\ V r'4'• ;•, T• • r•.,t•' 1- 7cr .i. to \' l.•JYL.f' JSL Illsr lk“a J l ,o T TI 1 i l.T•-^i -- l • 1."1`&1' I:°. t R— :•. _. ':'•,.''t_ a; --TLt >i r• 1% 71464 .. . . . 47-1 r 1 " v j i/ I•1•.. r,• • tSJ;1., T( 6(f` + <. ':1 I ,fi. t 1'' : ' L•, • L .. I 2 In". .• •i 1 1. --"-•"u' L 1reSii1... 'a-'-.- LARRY HOWE. ; .R.EZO.NE •.FROM , R-,2•,• RESIDENCE -TWO -FAMTLY ' DISTRICT ; TO R-3 , MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT -' ' • File R-235-78 APPLICANT LARRY HOWE TOTAL AREA +22', 170 sq . ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Jefferson Avenue N -E . EX! SI ING ZONING R-2 , Residence Two Family EXISTING USE Two existing duplex residences.. ,. . PROPOSED USE Construction of two proposed duplex units . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN . Medium Density -Multiple Family COMMENTS i..-SEZ-a ;+7M029?) 474/0/ Mann Em d*.waso 1 21% 1. • 1 N)1 •H 0: j4 V 41 LI 7reinti•Id Li) . Tdaacio 9 co ap. i - 6'.' _Jo. - 414 .2- 9El lkZiI1 A 4 I-+ s m.k...•.1 i,i, &Vi vv5:14 LIUCV f l zIn9xTQ lam, A . rzE. v 20istO z virJyk 3N 11— oohl8 b • Ito ® 8vhi Mirk! HI ,) ..71ffol . g 0021.•8 742. ' Is rij` t Oil sie T . . . .,;...T. moo ..104:4" : IFEra usi w,‘VI .ilTil wr.„ sio )4-:,.. ....... i.,.. it, ezia co tio:-.6,,,,, El etss0 F.... ' IrS - EI 112501z51 I g. o A 0 B 14. i 4'0 91n •7rtOnct 0 alCa61 rho/ IN ici ri ' 1,o E. 1 %a 9 F vti .0 . ONY1MhIH IaON 1 J a r.., 1 tI n 16 n I_J ,i'r • J ' M I1 i - I El n it,.. 4 1 i11 n C r AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State. of Washington) County of King 2kZ C UU being first duly sworn, uponc. %y/ oath disposes and states:. That on the 7% day of 19 7F , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. f1, Subscribed and sworn this day of NoN)2uv.\3-2( 191`6 . Nit\ \\-\L 'cl, : • Notary Public in and for the State_ of Washington, residing at . Renton • Application, Petition or Case: 941/-0-C i 0 / The minutes contain a .Pigs-t o 6 .the pan t leis neeond) T THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z • p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 EO SEP1 November 16, 1978 Members,. Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: 'File•No. R-235-78; Larry Howe Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated November 9, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on November` 27, 1978, and the report is being • forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following th'e seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on November 28, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on December 4, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Singer y,, 1 7. L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment November 30, 1978 Renton City Council 400 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Ref:. File No. R-235-78 Subject: Rezone Application Dear Council Members, Due to my absence from the State through the normal appeal period, I offer the ,following belated appeal for your consideration. It would seem that some important considerations were not offered for review at the recent hearing. Inire.viewing:the Planning Department's report that recommends denial of. the Rezone Application, there overlying objection was to maintain the density at or near the present level , even though the Comprehensive Plan, calls for medium density in the areas of the subject property. I' co! cur with their recommendation as stated in Paragraph 'P-2, dealing with protecting property values through effective controls. By requesting approval to add only four additional units to. my property for a. total of 8 units) which is large enough for 14 units per R-3 zon.ing, .I. hope to have demonstrated my concurrence that a smooth and even transition to a higher density is in the best interest of the area. Since no objection to the proposed zoning change was. introduced other than the Planning Department's and since the Hearing Examiner's office has chosen to approve the Rezone Application with restrictive covenants using as a presidence File No. -015-77; Stanley D. Wolf, dated March 21 , 1977, it becomes important to note what the, result of said "restrictive covenants" have had on that and other properties in the area. As pointedout in the Planning Department's report, any significant improvements to a property will enhance adjoining property Values and since my property is separated only by a 30 ft.. public use area from the property formerly owned by Wolf, referred to above, it follows that , my' property as well as all other surrounding properties could'. have benefitted had Wolf continued. It would seem that due to the requirements imposed upon that property to bring the existing structure up to current "building codes" 'have defeated their own purpose, as Wolf abandoned his project on Index Avenue, sold the property and it now sits there among the other postwar structures succumbing to the "premature decay and obsolescence" referred to in the Planning Department's Preliminary Report, Paragraph 08 of File No. R-235-78. A contrasting situation has occurred, only a few blocks away (corner of 12th & Harrington), where a property_ similar to mine existed. Currently under construction is an 18 unit 3 story apartment building where a maximum density situation is being created. Perhaps there is a 'middle ground where existing structures can, and should ,be upgraded to; protect the lifestyle and environment of the neighborhood from each of the extremes noted above. By making the existing structures comply with current "housing codes" and not the severe requirements of the building codes" myself and other owners of these buildings could then afford to upgrade our properties to suitable standards. Your consideration of this appeal is appreciated. Please call on me if further information is desired. Sincerely, Larn Howe I 2, Of z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 4TED November 27, 1978 Mr. Larry L. Howe 108 Factory Avenue N. , Suite 1 Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-235-78; Larry Howe Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Howe: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's report of November 9, 1978, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sincer- , L. Rick. Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk FILE NO. R-235-78 Larry Howe Rezone DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Larry L. Howe, a single man, is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lots 10 & 11, Block 46, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, page 92, Records of King County, Washington. WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes, grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, his successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT No building permit shall be issued for any new construction on the subject site unless the existing duplex is removed from the site or remodeled to existing City of Renton building code requirements and designed to be compatible with any construction on the site. Exterior design shall be approved by the Renton Planning Department. LANDSCAPE/SCREENING PLAN A detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of application for a building permit for any new construction or remodeling. Such landscaping plan shall include, but not be limited to: 1) Provision of an architectural-type screening fence together with a minimum five-foot landscape strip along the south and north property lines. 2) Provision of an architectural fence together with a minimum 10-foot landscape strip along the east property line. 3) Provision of additional landscaping adjacent to the buildings and throughout the site. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. 1 Larry L. Howe STATE OF WASHINGTON). COUNTY OF KING On this day of 19 , before me personally appeared the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in 2- z-41-7t 0 THE CITY OF RENTON 8MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 r CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER op o L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 qTF SEP1' November 16, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-235-78; Larry Howe Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated November 9, '1978. The appeal period for the application expires on November 27, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning. and Development Committee following the seven-day period from, the date of publication. —_ The complete file will be transmitted to the Ci-y Clerk on November 28, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda •n De'cember 4, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information - min• • --, matter, please contact the undersigned. Sind y, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment y1 1 Renton City Council 1/15/79 Page 2 Old Business - Continued Councilwoman Councilwoman Thorpe noted that she has enjoyed being a part of Thorpe the council and the committees she has worked on, especially Community Services (which she chaired).. She also thanked the staff for all the assistance and information they have given her. Speed Bumps on Councilman Shane requested the study of speed bumps being Residential installed in residential areas to control traffic. MOVED BY Streets SHANE, SECOND TRIMM TO REFER MATTER OF SPEED BUMPS ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: THORPE, PERRY, CLYMER, TRIMM, SHANE; 2-NO: SHINPOCH, STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. Award Mayor Delaurenti presented Councilwoman Thorpe an award for Presentation dedicated service to the citizens of Renton as a member of the City Council from January 1976 to January 1979. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO RECESS. CARRIED. Council recessed at 8:35 p.m. and reconvened at 8:55 p.m. Roll Call : All council members present except Councilwoman Thorpe who at this time has completed her services as a member of council. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report recommending the following Ordinance for second and final readings: ORDINANCE #3283 Ordinance was read amending a portion of City Code relating Fees and Filing to fees and filing of preliminary and final plats. First reading of Preliminary was 12/18/78. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM TO ADOPT THE and Final Plats ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: SHINPOCH, STREDICKE, PERRY, CLYMER, TRIMM; 1-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. Larry Howe Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading of Rezone the following Ordinance: R-235-78 1 Ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain properties within the City from residence district (R-2) to residence district (R-3). Rezone R-235-78 located Jefferson Ave. NE between NE 12th and NE 16th. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH TO REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following Resolutions for adoption: RESOLUTION #2237 Resolution was read setting public hearing of request for Street Vacation street vacation of Lakeview Ave. and Renton Ave. between NE 4th St. Lakeview Ave. & and NE 5th P1 . to be held February 26, 1979. Petition filed Renton Ave., by Wall and Redekop Corp. (VAC-9-78) MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND VAC-9-78) TRIMM TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. RESOLUTION #2238 Resolution was read setting public hearing of request for Street Vacation street vacation of area within Earlington Addition, South of SW Area Within Sunset Blvd. and North of Milwaukee Railroad Line, within Earlington Earlington Woods Woods PUD to be held March 5, 1979. Petition filed by Milwaukee PUD (VAC-1-79) Land Co. and CHG International . (VAC-1-79) MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to all Council members and adopted by one motion without separate discussion. Adoption of MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND STREDICKE TO REMOVE ITEM REGARDING Consent Agenda PARKWOOD SOUTH DIV. NO. 3 (FP-260-78) FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting January 15 , 1979 Municipal Building Monday, 8: 00 P . M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, COUNCIL PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE, GEORGE J. PERRY, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM, CHARLES F. SHANE. CITY OFFICIALS C.J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; GWEN IN ATTENDANCE MARSHALL, Finance Director; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; JOHN BUFF, Police Rep. , BRUCE PHILLIPS, Fire Rep. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle; SALLY McDONALD, Seattle Times MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 1979 MEETING AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Council Pam Jarnigan, President, Renton Chapter, National Organization for Vacancy Women, read letter encouraging council to appoint a women to the vacant council position, commending council for new procedure for filling of that position, and expressing appreciation of Councilwoman Thorpe for her efforts and understanding of issues while serving on the City Council . Traffic Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd. So. , Renton, requested city Problem review and take action re traffic problems on the Benson "s" curves. OLD BUSINESS Procedure for Council President Shinpoch presented procedure to be used in Filling of filling of the council vacancy Jeft by Councilwoman Thorpe as of Council Vacancy this day. Due to no council meeting being held January 29 (5th Monday) or on February 12 (legal holiday) and the 30 day time limit for appointing a new councilperson, a special meeting will be held Thursday, January 18, 1979. At this meeting all legally qualified persons interested in the position may make a presentation, not to exceed ten minutes ,followed by questions of councilmembers. No proxies will be permitted.No vote will be taken at this meeting,but balloting will commence Monday,January 22, 1979 under "New Business" no secret ballot will be permitted). Any councilmember may nominate a candidate(s) and no second is required. A candidate must receive four (4) votes to be appointed and in the event that no candidate receives the majority prior to adjournment February 5, the list of nominees will be forwarded to the Mayor to make a selection. In all instances, the appropriate City Code and RCW's will apply. Following discussion it was *MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE TO ACCEPT PROCEDURE FOR FILLING OF COUNCIL VACANCY. AMENDING MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ALLOW ONLY FIVE (5) MINUTES FOR CANDIDATES PRESENTATION AND REMOVAL OF LINE STATING "NO PROXIES WILL BE PERMITTED". CARRIED. *ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3284 AN ORDINANCE. OF; THE• CITY OF• RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING • THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESI- DENCE DISTICT (R-2) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) (R-235-78) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1.628 known as the "Code. of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-2); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about October 10, 1978, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about November 7, 1978, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow specified; subject to 'the findings, conclusions and decision dated November..9, 1978; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located at vicinity of 1501 and 1517 Jefferson Avenue N.E.) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed • by Petitioner-owners on or about January .22 , 19 79 and recorded in the office of the Director .of Records and Elections, Receiving No. 791220619 . and. which said Covenants hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if •fully Set forth: SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon 'its passage,;approval, i,e f and five days after its publication. PASSED BY: THE .CITY.,.COUNCIL: this ,'22 ` day' of=January, 1979.: maline Motor Deputypty City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 222 of January, 1979. 4./'41Crr.a- as 9" a aurenti, Mayoror Approved as to form: '. Lawrence J. War en, City Attorney Date of Publication: January 26 , 1979 fill l: 1; 5u', r r it' ( 10Ir.f rh` it}ti i EXHIBIT "A" LOTS 10 AND 11 , BLOCK 46 , CORRECTED PLAT OF RENTON HIGHLANDS NO . 2 , AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 57 OF PLATS , PAGE 92 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON . fir',"i i''.•:,•. : ,'• .-.11/.- ezi-r,i.:.opozabl:• ...'....,- :. . • • • - . ., s1!0 419e.,I a71/ . L-j ! • ' s l 9. Hsi a tin r . a. . N o - - 9- ' . 1[;14-0[3 re - cc) 02. 1 • 0/ .._B N a' . • g to. - • -' i......._1. __ a.- . . • . 14 Fop IN i. ,, .. Er •,.•• etze, •'0 cin.:1 1, • c' ..s 61:3 . El. rWA Mil ar N;P. - i 4 I1 N ib• •••7-...."• *• , a' . •.l•IP El Ph . 20: Z[Ey ow7'''',... r • 1 it •4cgs Li• 11 9 i, ti .. ...„,rzt.ra go N h,8 SR M—Iricesi: , H' ' ' •-• • • ' '. . s . . I r W' V . D otgl j--3 .. t,+ t a yy B 8 r S if't9 . •002L.,,.. . ....::,....47/;":••, „•73,.. : Ai'8' 9 i4 z !Era',0Qom . co,••, 499;.k...:..,4, 0 •A . • •.1-44:i‘t,654 opt us!0....m,- .• , .to.9. 1..... 4 .:.:::?...„.......::::::,..::::................:..... ini-.) .EI , . ,47.151) kt.,..,.!kr;,::;....,...,..,..-.7., . . 11115 L ZI CC:3. .' .. 4!'.: . .‘ ' . .' : 4Ea . 9. . ,.gist t• 5. huipici - • .,,,,,, . • igo g gi4, ‘ n n 1.-.J re.e. . vortv . , .1923:45 o 41"fur am Ner', ,..c., ...:.,:_,i: 9;-:51 I 41 1 I . si3. I1 ici , 1-i 13 ., n e its Q y1WV1Hhl W SON 1. , .., • 0I '0. ,., , , . iA '' - 1 i °9 C Py ti I 101 OF RA, 41 o THE CITY OF RENTON U MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 09,o ro CITY CLERK o9gr‘ D SEPTE Q January 30, 1979 Mr. Larry Howe Suite 1 103 Factory Avenue North Renton, Washington 93055 Dear Mr. Howe: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, January 22, 1979 has adopted Ordinance 3284 A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure LItF REAS ar' yf: Y AE_ . A,i4ri. 1 fk'giGb' i.l. f.- CIrL-r E NHOo':w'eR;.•2 ez on78e'' . ir'i f.:„a^ x f. R„k:;,:,1)*Oe9- E n e 3 ',!., ri .. ii. n,11', r f ST , CT COVENANT , kr4, y t DEC T d C.ount :of;;:;r1 'n s .:.,'":'- i''-;''''''-';-'''::i- ecr l- w,K, o 'ne of tfie' following eaYrn. ' WHE ; Ct=y L`' i` ow ^a!_ i ''1,e:?`'n .,: U: d:xsY: Stae'of;'.1] h in to""n .dsribed:•'as'- fl: i 'the`Cit :of'`.•Renton'.' o ertn k' n :t.Sti 1ii.44 tag' n li`: t"4 Pr.. 2 2'4 °orrecte8':,:'P1at": n land•s"'No: asLotsl0`' '.'ll'`;:r==:Bi2. , b_'`k:I.0 o g- s 'i to•''n Co. t Wa h•ri n.,:'::.a ord e .SZ'of•"P.lats `a' e;<..ecorced'', ri.;Vq'luin rP g. . 5 Y g rl:ri9`'.i. t., 1: ._.:,• theproperty,WHEREAS, 'the.,,,owner; of-,"said' de.5,criY'edv.:nproperty,•'hereiriaf.ter desires to 'impo'''''''thefollowings`res'tr ctive-covenants •running ,with, the land as to. . use, resent ando ert 4.. r,1 aSil j-Mtn,. I's i id .' "finer 'hereb establishes rants, and' imposesNOW, 'THEREFOREy;;'the''°aforesa o y: g-. Po restrictions an• d `covenaritsr''runniing`'`wth''.tYie 1 and''as. to the'.`use of the land hereinabove' described .with 'respect to the u e`by ';the'undersigned, his successors, ssi ns as''_follows .` N heirs and a g ,' 4' ISSUANCE- 'OF',,f317ILDING PERMIT.':';•;: No buildin ermit shall• be_,issued;.;for .any .new<'=construct on.'-on the subject.-site 'unlessgP µ;' i du lex..isremo ed.,' "'rom 'the'.'s te:w,or, remodeled >to :ex stin Cityof Renton'he •exist ng p f, g Y• ' '• '. building 'code •requirements'',and` desined%'':,to.';:'ke;'com at'ibl'e:with' an const action on,the',; , , Site. Exterior,' des shah ;'be a roved:'b ':thei:Rentoii`':Pl,anning Department.9n: i• PP, Y'r, ANDSCAPE/SCREENING'PLAN: i; R nton.hall`be;siibmitted'`:to'=a •ri.' '" • roved r the. eA'detailed landscape s:creehr 1 pP Y _ , o n new,, itf r.aPlanningDepartment.at-th time°atoiif 'r:'a buld n' ermeof•!apple o s2i 1.,' r` include bu• t not:b e limite d.construction or remodelin - 'S.ucl- Jlandsca rig plan' a 1g.• r P 1) Provision of';"an.arch tectural-type:sereeninc fence.together with a minimum five-foot:"landscape. strip-.along the 'south,,`and .no rth property lines.. 2) Provision of.:an architectural ;fence together.:with a minimum 10-foot . , .i. ,,'"','.;:',.-.,. '. landscape strip 'along' the:: east,,property',-line. ' add 'd acent. .. , the buildings and3) Provision of 1`andscaping.,a throughout the, site:: DURATION These covenants shall run with• the land 'and, expire•on .December 31; 2025.• If at any time improvements are,..installed pursuant to these covenants,,-the portion of the covenants pertaining to ;the specific installed :improvements.:'as. required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without •necessity of further documentatino . Proper legal procedures' in'the Superior',Court of 'King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton ,or _any, property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected ,by„any violation or breach of these 'restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys'" fees„incurred„ during an''enforcement:.proceeding will be borne by the parties, whom'the court determines are in'error and shall, be "entered as a judgment in such action vj'. i - • y i if::ifi=+r+ ti•n tnan. f' i i('// 1. i s/' 1,, ' 0( lf,f .. A1 1 F ri -•'.' . JL JF' r jyVWC ' . sic.' ` .. 1;;;;;:{''; r.." j,. t .i':_ak 1 x'r?`y'.l,c: t.A'. l. Y.r;.v,,.,.'' .`.;I":, STATE. OF WASHINGTON)` `'`_ COUNTY OF KING • J) , „ , On this02 7-- day of c L./ 19 71, before me personally appeared 'Jcttr- /. • ,4' e.'e___ -. ," -.'': ,',the.;:person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged-said''instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said ,person ':forj e;-:•uses;,'and;purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,`I .have »hereunto set'my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. 11• x ` pit C Notary Public in and` for..the ate=' ' of .Washington', residing' r_•' r.. 2- OF •RA, y o THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 90 co- CITY CLERK o9gTo SEPS - e` P February 6, 1979 Mr. Larry Howe 108 Factory Avenue Norte, Suite A Renton., Washington 98055 Re: Recorded documents Dear Sir: Enclosed please find your copy of the document (s) recorded with King County Records and on file with the City Clerk' s Office of Renton. Very truly yours CITY OF RENTON a. /1i ^- Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM/db Enc (y ) V Renton City Council 1/22/79 Page 2 AUDIENCE COMMENT Council Joan Moffatt, 3709 Meadow Ave. No. , noted she was out of town and Vacancy unable to attend Thursday special meeting for interviewing of candidates for the council vacancy. Ms. Moffatt expressed that she is still interested in the council position. OLD BUSINESS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report Committee 'Report recommending the committee retain matter of Theatre Admission Theatre Admission Tax to review the total structure of admission taxes and fees Tax and that collection of revenue from Theatre Admission Taxes, at the new rate, be delayed to March 1, 1979. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch requested a Fiscal Impact Statement be presented at the same time as the ordinance, showing the amount of lost revenue. Public Safety Councilman Perry presented Public Safety Committee report recommending Committee Report council concur in the Police Chief's recommendation to enter into an Housing of agreement to house prisoners for the Muckleshoot Indian Nation; Prisoners for Mayor and City Clerk authorized to sign contract agreement. Allen Muckleshoot Sanders,Attorney for Muckleshoot Tribe, Office of the Tribal Indian Nation Attorney, 38811 172nd Ave. SE, Auburn, noted Tribe has its own law enforcement, but no jail facilities. Mr. Sanders added that the amount of jail time would probably not exceed 200 days per year, and would mainly be used for deterrents. 30 day cancellation clause explaine MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: SHINPOCH, STREDICKE, CLYMER, TRIMM; 2-NO: PERRY, SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Committee Report recommending concurrence in the Public Works Department recommendation Award of Contract- to accept the low bid of Pacific Construction Co. , Inc. for Bronson Way Street Federal-Aid FAUS Project, Bronson Way North and South Street Improvements Improvements in the amount of $175,678.36. Bid opening January 4, 1979, This award will be contingent upon receipt by the City of an "Authorization to Award" from the Federal and State Agencies . Mayor and City Clerk authorized to sign contract agreement. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND PERRY TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Taxing Motion by Shane city place 2% tax on Longacres. Failed for lack Longacres of second. *Moved by Trimm, Second Stredicke the item of taxing Longacres be referred to the Ways and Means Committee. Mr. Shane expressed his dissatisfaction of his fellow council members. Mayor Delaurenti asked the police representative to escort Councilman Shane from the Council Chambers in accordance with Council 's Rules of Decorum. Recess MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE TO RECESS. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:10 p.m. Roll Call : All council members council members _present. Mayor requested disregard of prior executive order. Congacres-Cont. *Motion failed. (See later action, Page 4) ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report recommending the following Ordinance for second and r final readings: ORDINANCE #3284 Ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Larry Howe Rezone properties within the city from residence district (R-2) to R-235-78 residence district (R-3). Rezone R-235-78 located Jefferson Ave. NE between NE 12th and NE 16th. First reading was 1/15/79. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. fi r RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting January 22 , 1979 Municipal Building Monday, 8: 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, COUNCIL GEORGE J. PERRY, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM, CHARLES F. SHANE. ' CITY OFFICIALS C.J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; GWEN IN ATTENDANCE MARSHALL, Finance Director; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director, GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; JOHN BUFF, Police Rep. , Battalion Chief JAMES MATTHEW, Fire Dept. Rep. PRESS MARY SWIFT, Renton Record Chronicle; SALLY McDONALD, Seattle Times MINUTE APPROVAL Councilman Stredicke requested correction Page 3, Paragraph 1, 1/15/79, add that the citizens in the Parkwood area were mislead as to the proper time of protesting the traffic situation and the President of Rolling Hills Association withdrew his protest pending public hearing on street vacation of SE 20th P1 . Councilman Stredicke add to Page 3, Paragraph 9, Utilities Committee report, for the record to show not for proposed customer connection, but for customer use beyond May Creek, not for new construction within May Creek. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 1979 AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch requested. council minutes reflect "Thursday" Special Meeting of January' 18, 1979. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 18, 1979 AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, LID 312-Street published, and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened Improvements, the Public Hearing to consider proposed LID 312, street improvements, West Valley on West Valley Hwy. from SW 43rd St. to the City Limits. Improvements Hwy. to include construction and installation of curbs, gutters and sidewalks, storm drains, catch basins, together with a left turn lane and all necessary appurtenances. Letter was read from Bruce Leber, Ralph Leber Co. , PO Box 88700, Tukwila, agreeing with the LID, but protesting the area included within the .LID, ,total cost, and the method of assessment. Letter was read from William E. Rabel , Star Machinery, 241 South Lander Street, Seattle, requesting assessment for left turn lane be based on actual linear feet of the lane to benefit them. Letter was read from Norman K. Dewey, President, Northwestern Hobby & Toy, 17300 West Valley Highway, Tukwila, protesting proposed curbs and sidewalks, construction of left turn lane and the proration of the LID expenses. Letter was read from Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director, noting the percentage of those property owners protesting their assessment is 40.23% of the estimated cost ($184,109. 15), and requested the public ' hearing be continued two weeks, allowing time to meet with property owners in the area. Harold Hill , Mercer Island, property owner, noted no charge should be made for improvements already completed on the property and that there is no need for sidewalks. Bruce Rowe, 1313 E. Prospect, Seattle, part owner of Hill property, noted need for left turn lane and opposed to installation of sidewalks. Following discussion it was MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY TO CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TWO WEEKS,UNTIL FEBRUARY 5, 1979. Councilman Stredicke requested detailed information on conditions previousl.y_ agreed to by property owners and the actual square footage of properties involved. Mr. Gonnason noted current bid openings showed a possible increase in costs of the LID. MOTION CARRIED. jralGi t. OF R4', A z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL',BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 O CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 94 L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 0, 9gT 04, Q r ,_. 1 FD SEP1- 2 0J/ January 29', 1979 Mr. Larry Howe RECEIVED co108FactoryAvenueN. , Suite No. 1 CITY Of RENTON Renton, .WA 98055 c+% CLERK'S OFFfCE p RE: File No. R-235-78'; Larry Howe Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Howe: This is to notify ,you that the above referenced request was approved at the meeting of the Renton City Council of January 22, 1979, by adoption of. Ordinance No. 3284. Sincerely, i} s_ _ L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning DepartmentfanningClerk K 3 Put Notjce'sd 4 "1Pu'bljc Notices A•'•'S3"-` 2aotfrlt'•riTk'r'.l'?r pT r.4r, p CITY OF RENTON Maxine'E.•M'otor WASHINGTON Deputy City'Clerk ORDINANCE.NO:3284 APPROVED BY THE. AN ORDINANCE ,OF, MAYOR this 22nd day of`. THE CITY OF RENTON„ • .January,1979. • W A S H I-N G T 0 N . . ' •Charles J. Deiaurenti• CHANGING"THE ZON- May&Affidavit of Publication ING CLASSIFICATION• ,Approved as to form:. OF CERTAIN PROPER- Lawrence J.Warren- TIES WITHIN THE CITY . City Attorney. STATE OF WASHINGTON OF RENTON FROM RE- Published in the Renton COUNTY OF KING ss. SIDENCE DISTRICT(R- Record-Chronicle January! 2)TO RESIDENQE DIS- 26, 1979. R5341 ^J 1 TRICT(R-3)(R-235-78)• i WHEREAS-under.Chapt.- tee:7,Title IV(Building.Regu-.- Theodora Tht3ney being first duly sworn on lations) of. Ordinance No. I 1628 known as the"Code`oft+ General Ordinances of the oath,deposes and says that the .....GI1]:Ca•g•••C•1•erk of City of Renton,"as re-THEamend-RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) po, and the maps and times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and ports adopted in conjunction has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred therewith, the property to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- .hereinbelow described has paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, heretofore been zones as and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained Residence District (R-2); at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton and Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the ' WHEREAS a proper peti- Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 1 tion for change of zone f classification of said proper- l ty has been filed with the Washington.That the annexed is a onliamme 0 3.2 B 4 t•Planning Department on or about October .10, 1978, which petition was duly re- ferred to the Hearing Ex-, aminer' for investigation, as it was published in regular issues(and (study and public. hearing, not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period land a public hearing having been held thereon on or Iabout November 7, 1978, and said matter having been of consecutive issues,commencing on the I duly considered by the Hear- i ing Examiner and said zon- I ing request-being in confor- 2 6...day of ,jeil.ua.IT 19..7.9...,and ending the miry with'the City's Com- prehensive Plan,as amend- ed,• and the City Council day of 19 both dates ' having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- jand all parties having been scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Iheard appearing in support thereof or in opposition charged for'the foregoing publication is the sum of $.5.9...2 9which ', thereto, NOW THEREFOR has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the THE CITY,COUNCIL OF first-insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent THE .CITY,OF RENTON, insertion. i WASHINGTON, DO OR- DAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I:The following decribed property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned i Eo Residence District (R-3) Gh•i. g...C. •o•rk as hereinbelow' specified; subject to the findings,con- blusions and decision dated------ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26 day of November 9,1978;the Plan ping Director is hereby au-i 1'>.n.0 l yrr ; 19 7`3 thorized and directed to change the 'maps-=of the; roriing Ordinance, as?01- /v1,kfk— [ mended, to evidence said, Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,rezoning,to-wit: , N residin atUm King County.l EXHIBIT"A" LOTS 10 AND 11, 4„,,'OD'i BLOCK'46, CORRECT- ,ji ED PLAT OF RENTON FII Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June I HIGHLANDS NO. 2,AS lU 9th, 1955. RECORDED IN , VOLUME 57 OF PLATS, Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, PAGE .92, RECORDS adopted by the newspapers of the State. OF KING COUNTY, ', WASHINGTON. 1 Said property being to-, cated at vicinity of 1501' and 1517 Jefferson Av- I enue,N.E.) V.P.C.Form No.87 AND SUBJECT FURTHi R`to that certain Declara FILE NO. R-235-78 Larry Howe Rezone DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Larry L. Howe, a single man, is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lots 10 & 11, Block 46, Corrected Plat of Renton Highlands No. 2, as . recorded in Volume 57 of Plats, page 92, Records of King County, Washington. WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes, grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, his successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT No building permit shall be issued for any new construction on the subject site unless the existing duplex is removed from the site or remodeled to existing City of Renton building code requirements and designed to be compatible with any construction on the site. Exterior design shall be approved by the Renton Planning Department. LANDSCAPE/SCREENING PLAN A detailed landscape/screening plan shall be submitted to and. approved by the Renton Planning Department at the time of application for a building permit for any new construction or remodeling. Such landscaping plan shall include, but not be limited to: 1) Provision of an architectural-type screening fence together with a minimum five-foot landscape strip along the south and north property lines. 2) Provision 'of an architectural fence together with a minimum 10-foot landscape strip along the east property line. 3) Provision of additional landscaping adjacent to the buildings and throughout the site. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants; the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. ry STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this o2 7 day of>2, _ten./a-tom 197r, before me personally appeared _,44/f /• hloAd e= the person' who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for, the ate of Washington, residing in 2 r,; e7..,-,;,: 4.„- 7::;,:- A,-,,...,!.,.. f;,, 4,,, k,:,, f.;,.,,;, f,,,,...,.,.,.',.:.,.,..;.,.'::%:',..,.-.,...::...,.?,.').‘:,,,,.,,.: r. 1,;.....:,.„.......,.' .•.':.-,....-......,,,,.'/',..,,",'..;.':..:.,•,'......•,--!.,..'.,.,•...:.,...-,..•.:..,.,,,.---,'-::. 2„.."..•,,::.,..:..-,•::'-.,:,-. '..-., T.-..-...:,.,..•,.,,--,,...Y:..',..',,..,..•-..'•...'.::',,--e-.,-.:•,.:,:,-.'''-:.,O,:.....,..-.,.;,.F...,..:,.,-• ..'REN'.'TON 7247 ft4q, INApC DtrAnrmENT e) 26CD9.i4 h , RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 RECEIVED OF Iti'iy:f' , sixbs34- n3 ,f t`. ' . TOTAL c PO GWEN E..' MARS HALL,, 1 FINANCE DIRECTOR BY 'V v rs_ v 61, t', Ta; ary',.. PCE; CG err:.N November 30, 1978 R121282930 Renton City Council kr 3 400 Mill Avenue So. rr0v7s, mRenton, Washington 98055 8 Ref: File No. R-235-78 thY f.. Subject: Rezone Application foe", Dear Council Members., Due to my absence from the State through the normal appeal period, I offer the following belated appeal for your consideration. It would seem that some important considerations were not offered for review at the recent hearing. In reviewing the Planning Department's report that recommends denial of the Rezone Application, there overlying objection was to maintain the density at or near the present level , even though the Comprehensive Plan calls for medium density in the areas of the subject.property. I concur with their recommendation as stated in Paragraph P-2, dealing with protecting property values through effective controls. By requesting approval to add only four additional units to my property for a total of 8 units) which is large enough for 14 units per R-3 zoning, I hope to have demonstrated my concurrence that a smooth and even transition to a higher density is in the best interest of the area. Since no objection to the proposed zoning change was introduced other than the Planning Department's and since the Hearing Examiner's office has chosen to approve the Rezone Application with restrictive covenants using as a presidence File No. -015-77; Stanley D. Wolf, dated March 21 , 1977, it becomes important to note what the result of said "restrictive covenants" have had on that and other properties in the area. As pointed out in the Planning Department's report, any significant improvements to a property will enhance adjoining property values and since my property is separated only by a 30 ft. public use area from the property formerly owned by Wolf, referred to above, it follows that my property as well as all other surrounding properties could have benefitted had Wolf continued. It would seem that due to the requirements imposed upon that property to bring the existing structure up to current "building codes" have defeated their own purpose, as Wolf abandoned his project on Index Avenue, sold the property and it now sits there among the other postwar structures succumbing to the "premature decay and obsolescence" referred to in the Planning Department's Preliminary Report, Paragraph 08 of File No. R-235-78. A contrasting situation has occurred only a few blocks away (corner of 12th & Harrington), where a property similar to mine existed. Currently under construction is an 18 unit 3 story apartment building where a maximum density situation is being created. Perhaps there is a middle ground where existing structures can, and should be upgraded to protect the lifestyle and environment of the neighborhood from each of the extremes noted above. By making the existing structures comply with current "housing codes" and not the severe requirements of the building codes" myself and other owners of these buildings could then afford to upgrade our properties to .suitable standards. Your consideration of this appeal is appreciated. Please call on me if further information is desired. Sincerely, L y Howe 2. THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI c MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD AO CITY CLERK 4) 4TED SEP1°'° November30, 1978 APPEAL FILED BY: Larry Howe 108 Factory Ave. N. , Suite #1 Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated 11--9-78, Rezone R-235-78 located Jefferson Ave. NE Between NE 12th NE 16th. R-2 to R-3, Larry Howe To Parties of Record: A request for appeal by the City Council. of the above Hearing Examiner's decisiont'6f-11-9 --has been filed with the City Clerk's office along with the $25.00 appeal fee. City Code 4-3016 requires that an appeal be filed within 14 days, therefore, the appeal period ended November 27; however, Mr. Howe reported he has been out of the state and has requested the appeal period be extended and his appeal considered. The appeal has been set forth in writing. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the matter of the Larry Howe rezone R-235-78 will be before the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of December 11, 1978 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Municipal Building, Renton. If the City Council determines that the appeal will be accepted for consideration, the written appeal and all pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee. You may contact this office or the council secretary at 235-2586 for infor- mation of the next meeting of the Planning and Development Committee. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor Deputy City Clerk MEM/st cc: Parties of Record Renton City Council.to;12/11/78 Page 4 Consent Agenda CONSENT AGENDA The fol 1 owi ng 'items are. distributed to all ,Council members and adopted by :one' motion without'-'separate .discussion. (Adopting motion, t'o .fol.l:ow.-sagendat.:i.tem :;) Appointment Letter from.:Mayor Del adrenti 'reappo:inted .Mr.....Walt`Dragin to Fire Civi I"'Service.,.' Civil ;Servi_ce;;Commi ss"i,on..:for:a:•si=x-year';::term::.to be' effective. Commission thr..ough December 31; 1984:y;;,Refer to>'Mays:;and,,Means Committee. . . Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs Mary Mattson to Board of the.,Board;of;;Ethics .for..a; four-year term;.to be effective through Ethics December, : 1982: Refer to Ways.;,.and ,Means Committee. Appointment Letter.;from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs,. Barbara Schel.1ert Planning to the'.,:Planning ':Commission' for;;.=a•.:three4sear:term to be effective' Commission through •January 31, 1981 .:Refer to :Ways. and':Means Committee: Appointments LettMrs':er'-from Mayor' Delaurenti' appointed,Mr. :.Lloyd Meeks and. Mrs.. Municipal Arts Jackie Aspaas and the reppointment. of ;Mrs, 'Sylva Coppock Commission to the .Munic:ipal ArtsCommission ;for ,a-three-year' term to be effective through December '31, 1981. r,, IRefer to Ways and Means Committee. Claim for. Claim:.for damages was filed:by",Mary McDonald, 10923 Rainier. Damages Ave. Seattle alleging :injury. from ,fal,:1,;'"on sidewalk.' Refer to 'City Attorney and InsGr,ance -Carrier:. Adoption of MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY ;:TO. ADOPTT,,,THE CONSENT AGENDA. Consent Agenda CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND:. CURRENT BUSINESS Larry Howe , Request :for rezone filed':°by.`Larry .Howe Sfor`',R-2 to R-3 for propertyRezonelocatedJeffersonAve.. NE, 'between NE. 12Tth ,.and NE 16th. HearingExaminerdecisionwas., approval, with restrictive covenants. R-235-78: Councilman :Perry; explained: request for: appeal' which was filed afterthe:::appeal period had ended; *MOVED BY:;THORPE,SECOND PERRY REFER MATTER OF 'REZONE AND POSSIBLE APPEAL,,TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENTCOMMITTEE. Substitute •motion.=byi:Shane 'that. the matter be'voted. . ron:,at this.time. Motion.,,fai`l;ed: for lack:of .'second. *ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED: Added Items MOVED BY :THORPE,- SECOND SHANE :THAT THE-ADDED ITEMS BE, INCLUDED ON,NEXT WEEKS AGENDA. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Naming of New MOVED BY CLYMER, .SECOND SH'INPOCH, ;TO NAME THE NEW FIRE STATION Fire Station THE CHARLESJ. DELAURENTIFIRE STATION. , ;CARRIED: Election MOVED BY THORPE,,,SECOND:PERRY TO OPEN NOMINATIONS FOR COUNCIL Council PRESIDENT. CARRIED, Councilwoman Thorpe nominated BarbaraPresident ` Shinpoch for President of 'the'Counci l: for 1979. MOVED. BY: PERRY, SECOND THORPE NOMINATIONS;BE CLOSED. CARRIED) -MOVED BY 'THORPE, SECOND SHANE A UNANIMOUS VOTE OF COUNCIL FOR SHINPOCH. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch named Council President commencing:.January, 1979.. Election MOVED BY. PERRY, SECOND THORPE ,:TO OPEN ,NOMINATIONS FOR COUNCILCouncilPRESIDENTPROTEM. CARRIED. ,•Nomination:; .of Trimm by Councilman President Perry: ,MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE NOM,INATI.ONS BE CLOSED. Pro -ter CARRIED. 'MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND 'THORPE UNAMINOUS VOTE OF COUNCILFOR_TRIMM. -CARRIED. Councilman Trim named Council President Pro .-tern commenci ng January,.1979: December 14, 1978 MEMORANDUM TO COUNCIL MEMBER S FROM: PLANNING iAND',:'DEVELOPMENT'„COMMIT.TEE RE HOWE' APPEAL (R-235 78) Extenslon of time for .filing ,•'of appeal The Planning and Development Committee-;;has considered whether the ap.peal,, of; Larry Howe. in the above-captioned matter should be dismissed for, failure to .timely:; i1e, the appeal as required •b.y, Sect-ion 4-301.6 of, the City Code m!5 in4'rpnv4 The Committee s finds :that Mr Howe was mic.load to his detriment bymemb.ers of the :cit_y_ staff into believing that the time: for,'„ appeal of the.'.decis'ion of the-•. Hearing Examiner had expired. ::.:°.Mr...,: Howe has ,;presented..eV •Bence;, .a ,copy of which is attached,;:;to :the :effec.t that he; was advi,sed;on November':' 27 ,. 1978 .(the last da,y for filing of his appeal) that the time period: for filing had expired .and that he should write, to `the Council requesting an extension of the•: time<'period. f t l',°abov erumstancesB•as'Ed. 'u 'on'``tki;e:.`:`eX'terivattr- :,'c,- c t, the Committee recommends that: the appeal. should: n'ot ,be"dismissed and ,recoinu ends that the:'ma:tt;er`b'e;;ref err'ed;``:by the Council •.to the Planning -and Development° Committee-'`•for :consideration •of the matter `on-'::the .merits. George ..Perry', Chairman Barbara. Shinpoch. Patricia Seymour-Tho pe 1il' `I, ,. -.1, :i.q - •,i - f: `,; I, . r r.` ' r; tb:;. 11'`-,t` 4; i; rr`'f r1 ','(i - d,,: , f ,,.Z., r' S"f'4',%''+'t: i" ' 4 i• 4."`-.,:• i-'';>fY`. ,i'vi -"Fo ch,..,.:'•4: i;j:' 1' L'•{•'Lt,,'Ixd;=f,,'u- l.,, 4' r'^, f k^n rl'`ej ,.i 'nTl-:':L."•I' ).. a lc y,; ."'tid- i '•\v 'i at'•`.• r5':, 4.x:;'. 4, -' r r tir" r.:t =1r;aR+ti'":^ 't,+• t l•T•'-'.,,.. ••,1 a+'« , r i• "•.Ct,' 2- 4":.. -., i; '•; }a..• a } 4ye 1 ..- 4.4 . tr .,, ,.tc+•e- N-,,,, A;rr. l'' ,.11;e h', -,J• t: ,f 'rM1° '.`'^". `-•tom;• 5, 8'. I,r f: ^ k'4 r7 J r•Li`,L, L'w.; r Vlr'1' a t'7,r a - k' r4i;r '.fit'„rb'':I;' t, r r1r.G .r ;r ' .•sV ts ,r.Jnth, -. --`'-.`•r+• E hi,, r+ ...., r r.n •e+, yur, f,?"' 1t. Jl+e;:'u ir.T!'",,','.'-,i:.°iL,:r' ,ro•Ir r#.ary., y .. 5,? ,.ka.. .r rf-; ,,,•W ,t5,, f ,,,•• di ; ri...-'':+-,:';d.4,- ,r.Sy'g,i,Sk,+}r., L2 ',.,S&, ,.e,... 4,,, r•' ,;a', '1iJ),r i .:-,.,'.( st. s' °' t x'M NICIBA`L'';BUI' DING'p°`'200 MI'LLxA'V['s'.SO'aREN' ON'v1NAS'H.=98055''-y ;<: Mi,Xr> .qn- •:r.. '^J: f:v,• mac., i'U. .Lit' rt Jt{-. _ l'"[:= , T 1yti- h '`r?', .J>7,,- r,t,i„ `tf,a;'' - ''i.':; .y, .t,;fie ;i:.•. Yk.`%:.' .=?i;-. _C 7' gg . k Q,,,,. r,i:-.,7,,.•,., ( i.- '.f - {;`.'NID <; , i; Tt.7 - -d: j . y'ur`'` I j,_,,.•i .[„arj('•at#tit:. )r;1,'.I,{Pi,„!'-.". :, j. ,.J,1„ 3'Sw`,rh..l. y,' i"r; t.4a: O)r'.a,i4S[;.sv r, p'E' ,) r:,";) _ y r•' NALL :++`' s•HARI'ES tMDELAURENtI"' iiAAYO . L.A D•USE: HEAR!`' G-::EkAIVIfN•ER' L.''- ICK'BEELER', 23'5 '`2593 y`. -<'t rtt i. - 'i' rQ"v,'i:f {:f' 1{": r.: •4R.h=1 t r' 3iy. Wit''t'Y h f rSF.'T i ylp-i'v i i'r rrq 7.ir:i' .':- .December'Il`5. '1. 8- - Y')Ili 4;' :;l 1}= f.' .1.]1:1'•J-.ty,- vv,'r J r n'F'1'tYr r'ti' Y'' 4' l' 3y:` it• 1,ii, a'!" y, y r- I, t, t,fr0: CouTi' m`'-'n„Geo` J:. ,er h. ''ia^-'itr;,,.r•'. 2 G -, e,9 ryr-;` a mi`n?,«.. ', it r;tz;' ' ;;`.', t . .: emb'er's'' ari 'i :'&::"'e }o 1- 14 P1 n rig: D el.pment Coi mittee.' ti:. LIB': ":.,'; r Y - Zi`: h F On hi:-c 'ee :'r• eari riirier'' 5-,':Ir B le ,,,K rig„rExa t 1. t,; :t; i" rt r'•D':_1'_ l 4i asr, :-n ;."E, • t '(fit' d v,i' :,,:. `[ i`. T.'.' . StB3ECT: F 1;e,;,,No.: },r1 -',3'5•-78; `rLJaT^Yt'-;Howe':' e`' ues,t Yfo ''Rezone,;' r- , 4/ t' ":, fin` egl y, I,,;(-,i l fir .,(-';e'; :] q_ :,- r• ;',-, t Y' i • i r' c" C 4-'i hf,iln• ''.r. r,: ii 1: "'.L"' ..2..f•;•1v.' ,. Li 9 i r:y.rT.p 'i.,'t.,. `h= ria 1,r, T s',•me or'a um'rs.'.:to'"con'finr' .thatr;;,t'li'.e'a `eal'; ''.e 'iod for"+Mr:" 'H we' r"-.•Gs.fw' ' ;, y PI?•Y p- e r rr. 9'' ••n w•' :: rtiti" i;y'"; rf`.' d., - laf't' - t-. fir•.1, y,;A re !ues't± 'had.`bo-e'ii.:',estabh s `-e:'.a'iu,,,rt)ie'yExain.ner-,s` e,c`3s '.ori•:as°Novemb'''r:''7;' -i.4•zr6.. 1t'•f,}' - q y.;f.. f; t,r+ -e„I ;., i. , t a-y c Y i. 11is ','`Yi, rTi:j t., ,, '•y:6ii't:Ft,' irl'a,fi', - „ra Oii Nov,e' 4--''"9':,` 97'8; yr;kh'e Ex-;- '' '> ued:"Niel- -• '-mmen at`' 'on:4 ,Tli'e V ' normal";14=dam' }'a` ea-1i`r er:'o {+exp ed :0 3 "T•978a Ho•w e 'r'' Ki ;n5'';,.`'r -s Y,',PP p ;,.;." ;p ;, _ ri•xi!_oveinbe,r,';,'?i „%'=, • r„; ev x',,,;. due to' the T ia. 'kS ' vin P. h li ' 'a' ;.the='`'e'; ''"d'twa .ex 'er1'ded;'t'o;:'.Novembe -27 i'' 1978 .t'he 'f" 'r't da t 'o ice'-'was; 'e lo' n -Y, r;,qr., :. i" Y,; P u,yr i'ri:: ,va`. i,- •,-',,:-e.r. y' eY. .4- 4.-a) - ;fiyla• - ti"i?i:. 'h• ;u .,' t 's '1'', L}, f,''.5 t. ,t;i:.:9'".' s';'; i1,(: ,ri,v5 1 .-e•r y `ir;•:.`i- r.,;,,•''v':r rr;; .,6 i'' t i;r•. 1: i•sf'. ;in,ri.,S. 51, :'E l",rJ r 1•',rr :i'.. fr]+"r.. '<., 1r;r,4. Ai I,v, ti., y y{ i N'... if..p•it '+$ix n' e'."+ '.t 1.,: 1 4,,, ,.r' it'" i', c,'L; :i:;,J,:';' L s';,,i4, :;' When I 's oke wi; Y.,;`:„,,' I ow4 ori:;tVoveml" •27 Jam''"97& ' ti' ' rriadn"e` a ,: ',! Y ' : t trtforo`tterii, th s-:exte •s5.on.'.d:''th"e' normah a` eal'<,1:e ''od',jy,,Mr. .d•`'scus -`io v'''1u ,,,;; ( 5 P.,x;?, ,14 Y ,1 S ,.Y`',,,:,,;' ';i', ,.(,{` ,h ,(t,1,, with Mr`. ?'Howewas' "f ec a ratedt:•' upon'',the,' 'ar 'rer':a eal ex 'i'+rati°,On '1 al e-. a" yyYr' S'n r.y r ri`i'`r,j'i 1.,r'S; K. r. n, r r•. i;` - • f:1 4' ' : i +', y;,e-y:Nt 4,,t;r, t:,d(.;+}C 1 av'I: r'.'.1..,i. ".l°1 l'' ':'-' `:!n Y 5_;;{>'.i"::iif aC .`t'. r, iy/l t; ;...„,, P.,...,,, r . ti.tr 4i`..'- , ,et.,r:tt''``-i'}'' :)'.,i i ',q,.1a i tt"t' f/ tc r•.. ,';f`v:',`•„ ,,„ r.,r r',:i`,z`3 •' M1.: l:c;;rr '` ' i, 'l.,hyy -.14''rir. :rr ,t a.j. .'','J x. _ rti.a; ,41{Y---rr a•.:nl i 7';ti aY-'r,+`•'',Gt§ ',. • ,>•;, ,",'•'f?tt'L,'. t,- ,. . ., ' 4' ,l„;+' F;C. ,:J.. 3•,..'.;".r:.y,...., •r...,..Y",.4 i , t, q.r'-.t,-,I,c::., v: , t y,', i: ,k: r.,r.= iu't4r L J',. c-+f.fir , N - rho-''•,''i,!»':i:-1';. r". ',i''. s:"r i ii•, 5. d'; 3f$T, •'4.'``41 - tl-Y-'alb'r•}-;•i'_ .:i).'r.i..' M1,. ki'` lt , tl ') -',..1w: .i1'a - c`J' 'E'}, i' T,1T 9„''wl.-. i. r`r', - • a mil.'j: nt<._4i+• M, d:'+'-i h,r-.), t 1 s y F rrti' C. I r a'f: r it,r l1 i hh'7'..B 'ele ir,iic]C,'"' rIL. e I 1. - 9' lt.;''>" I ,'... .'F' - 1- M'i.• r-• - .{ . , 1•:t.' tit' 'r• r. 5 i'iti i„ y; ' 'f, t,Ys,: Hear•"ri' „"ExamT.•ri'er J '`:Y.gf e r'tl."\`'-_ -3•sk,: r•',.,; 3>. rV 1 ` r,:-':7f'.r .'.f"F- p. r,, i': ({;q:',3(r 4t':.: 1 L..sty p' - 1. 1' t•11, Viw )) il;i, r. il v.'A;'n'y.- 'd'+ j}; '+' ar(S', '!"-• .Z• A' r.(,.'St;';i:, r. urr n,l ,t,r'-, J _.' j, ''rS 3"..;* r',q'F•..r qau"'n' ,,,,t ye ++y''1+ "!('"_ M1, ii, L 'i• G- +. ,A:'f y'Y.':,.,, .'(', p1:4d•, ,l. r r.• l' P•:•.I"c '. r , :?,,$Sa', - !-ti. "rf, St s.:,Y o f,R r' ip.+ i'} I Ir,. ,Lt,+.` So p•l.y+„n i- u': t:. ' CM11" v, r..-', r`r:• asi. i::^ ?a ,+,. ';i:" `'d;- ,L, Sro-d1•JVr- Lf,, i rf t r a:,t k l,• '' t''- '.,)' t. ,,rxtw ".fe'.1" ri., iry: +5/1+',:.T `.:L:s};-..,+''....-'-'y>'i,' '.'w,.;"' e:r;. r.,',`';i. t;i i:'•i,f ,a.:l,, 2:'i,` ,,, .,Sri;'-: 0, T.' 2 r r.y,,rY y.P•.-s '' -, p t ,j<... jA,.r i,4•-•, N,y(.,. f .;',Fg,r a. . };' tiv:r..,Ir..' _.pd'i,,. tier:,'•,,,.{=YJ .`•,_i, .,,. ,,` M'•. 1" p1rHjjtYe'S r tt - Y, t r r.rl,f, 4• i:t,`-:'. s -- r,:` +(. trix b -`l jq -!;- d ji.nCyr J, 4 Lh y ry,,,$ r ,:'1.' i,N, ,1 r . ,;''. :i H. ,.!•'•.:' m r 1F i;,L- ", •>r-,,r,,,. ; 3' .7(:' 1. 4r.c.,-+-''{. :'-•V -•".. ,,y.)yi'xr r. .L,,. .r` sd`. _ - ';'' r',', !)). ,L;3•rr3 fir' .r -L. + n m, , '}',, V. S' r:f5, li y#. 1J -h, M,t; ' 1:.'-..1,(,t-r...'),"L .IIM t.it=''rsir- hi•tzII n4 4 Y:, i'e*.:i' t ii1':1 'i, ttr tiF''C'7: ,••C` .r,. 10, 'nr,• a 2'; 1, i, 4''ry yf, L,,• r 7! 1 ''L' rr.Xti' x, yt',: i.5:5 s, r Li cr41,1 t Y. r1 t. r7 i".•it ,.. fit. l •,, C. ., 4 t y to -f c5"v t- l J' µF. t t Js r • 1 z' r•. Via' y' y i v, 1- L:- 'y yr. rtr}g=- 6' r^5 t• h. c"'fir.';r;` nr ,o`,:;• i Jai w'. It Renton City Council 1/8/79 Page 2 Old Business - Continued Council Councilman Stredicke inquired as to obtaining a picture of , Picture the present council as done previously.Mayor noted funds were not in the budget and council would have to purchase their own picture. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY THAT PICTURES BE TAKEN OF THE COUNCIL AND THE MAYOR ON THE SECOND WEEK IN JANUARY OF EACH YEAR AND THAT SUBJECT BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR FUNDING THIS YEAR AND BE CONTAINED IN THE BUDGET IN FUTURE YEARS. CARRIED. New Fire Councilman Stredicke inquired as to the completion date of the Station new fire station and occupancy date of the old fire station.Mayor Delaurenti noted possible completion of new station about mid-February with the contactor having definite information shortly,and occupancy of the old station would be about the same time. Councilman Stredicke also noted that Burlington Friends of Northern will be delivering 150 railroad ties to the Friends Youth of Youth to help in the landscaping work they are doing. Crosswalk at Councilwoman Thorpe noted need for an additional crosswalk Rainier Ave,. at Rainier Ave. and Grady Way. Warren Gonnason, Public Works and Grady Way Director, noted previous recommendation not to install an additional crosswalk due to conflicting traffic movements. Following discussion it was moved by Thorpe, second Stredicke council direct the administration to install crosswalk at Rainier Ave. and Grady Way. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY TO REFER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE FOR STUDY. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: SHINPOCH, PERRY, CLYMER, TRIMM; 3-NO: STREDICKE, THORPE, SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented Development report recommending Larry Howe appeal be denied and the council Committee Report concur in the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner of approval Larry Howe,Rezone of the rezone request (R..2 to R-3) with restrictive covenants. R-235-78 The area is located at Jefferson Ave. NE between NE 12th and NE 16th. The committee report also recommended referral ,to the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of the ordinance. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY TO RECESS. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:15 p.m. and reconvened at 9:30 p.m. Roll Call : All council members present. City Officials Moved by Shane, second Thorpe that no elected city official can Terms of Office serve more than two consecutive terms.SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: SHINPOCH, STREDICKE, THORPE, TRIMM; 3-NO: PERRY, CLYMER, SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented committee report recommending the following Ordinance for first reading and to advance to second and final readings: Ordinance #3282 Ordinance was read providing for appropriation of funds from Appropriation antirecession excess revenue to antirecession/Public Works/Street of Funds Maintenance Division in the amount of $402.64. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. After readings it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Appointment of Ways and Means Committee report noted concurrence in the Mayor's Municipal Court appointment of the Muncipal Court Judges Pro Tem for the year Judges Pro Tem 1979 of Robert Anderson, Peter Banks, Richard Conrad, Gary Faull , Roger Lewis, and Robert McBeth. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting January 8, 1979 Municipal Building Monday, 8 : 00 P . M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President, RICHARD M. STREDICKE., COUNCIL PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE, GEORGE J. PERRY, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM, CHARLES F. SHANE. CITY OFFICIALS C.J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; GWEN IN ATTENDANCE MARSHALL, Finance Director; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle. AWARD Mayor Delaurenti presented past Council President Earl Clymer PRESENTATION with an award for service as 1978 Council President for a job well done. SAFETY AWARD Mayor Delaurenti presented award for two years of pedestrian safety citation received by the City. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 18, 1978 MEETING AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and Renton Ave. mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the Public Meeting Annexation - continued from December 18, 1978) to consider the 10% petition 10% Petition to annex properties to the City in the area of NW 2nd to.SW Victoria St. and Renton Ave. , known as the Renton Ave. Annexation. Planning Director Ericksen used wall map to explain those properties favor Continued from ing annexation representing 20.4% and those opposed representing 28.4% Dec. 18, 1978 of assessed valuation. Telephone request was noted from Tom Rhinevault consulting firm,for week's extension of the public meeting. John Moore, 13249 91st S. , Renton, noted representation of those opposing annexation. William Milton, 32020 1st Ave. So. , Federal Way, representing Dr. Buckner, requested one week extension to allow time to speak to the people in the area of the proposed annexation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING. CARRIED. Council discussed the possibility of the petitioner obtaining a 75% petition if authorized. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION ON THE 10% PETITION. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: SHINPOCH, STREDICKE, THORPE, PERRY, CLYMER: 2-NO: TRIMM, SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Committee on Committee on Committees Chairwoman Shinpoch presented report Committees recommending that the 'following Committee assignments be approved: Report - Transportation Committee - Chairman Thomas Trimm, Richard Stredicke, Council Charles Shane; Utilities Committee - Chairman Charles Shane, Thomas Committee Trimm, Barbara Shinpoch; Ways and Means Committee - Chairman Earl Assignments Clymer, Richard Stredicke, George Perry; Public Safety Committee - Chairwoman Barbara Shinpoch, George Perry, Thomas Trimm; Community Services Committee - Chairman Richard Stredicke, Earl Clymer, Barbara Shinpoch; Planning and Development Committee - Chairman George Perry, Earl Clymer, Barbara Shinpoch. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Councilwoman Thorpe did not participate in Committee assignments. s Sl-G V r PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT January 8; 1979 RE: Larry Howe Appeal of Hearing Examiner' s Conditions for Rezone (.R-235-78) ' On November 9,' 1978, 'the Hearing Examiner approved the applicant' s requested rezone from R-2 to R-3 subject to conditions. . The appli;cant' s ,appeal . r.equested modifica tion of the proposed 'conditions., . : The Planning. and Development Committee,. after examination of the record and the.,Hearing ;Examiner' s written decision, . findings , and conclusions pursuant to Section 4-3017 , and consideration° of the applicant's-testimony finds that no • substantial error in':fact',or law exists and recommends that the requested appeal . be denied. : -The'Committee further re- commends that- the Council concur. in ,the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and refer the. matter to the Ways and Means Committee.,f.or._pro,per resolution_ or ordinance prepara- tion. George Perry, - Chairman L. 4h, Barbara Shin ochP Patricia Seymour-Thorp, e ar a 4. Renton City Counci' 12/18/78 Page 3, Old Business - Continued Subdivision recommendations of an "exception" not be required to determine Regulations- placement of sidewalk, that the sidewalk location and any other Cont. technical design considerations be determined by the Technical Review Committee or the Public Works Director; allow the option to the developer of either vertical curb and gutter sections or rolled curb and gutter on streets within a subdivision classified as access streets; eliminate the requirement for piecemeal off- site improvements on arterials where the subdivision access is through the interior streets, thus eliminating the need for double frontage improvements be referred to the Planning and Development Committee for study and recommendation. The Commitee also recommended the matter to consider policy on burning for land development consistent with the policy now in effect by King County be referred to the Public Safety Committee. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Subdivision Committee of the Whole report recommended referral of subdivision Standards - ' standards for rolled curbs to the Planning and Development Rolled Curbs Committee for study and recommendation. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Procedure for Committee of the Whole report recommended referral of the Resignation procedure for resignations made by council to the Ways and of Council . Means Committee for policy recommendations. *MOVED BY SHINPOCH', Members SECOND PERRY TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO INCLUDE REFERRAL OF SUGGESTIONS FOR PROCEDURE. CARRIED. *ORGINAL MOTION CARRIED. Larry Howe Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented — Rezone and memorandum that the Committee had considered a request for .. Appeal appeal filed by Mr. Larry Howe. (Rezone File R-235-78) The R-235-78 committee found that Mr. Howe was misinformed to his detriment by members of the city staff. Based on the extenuating circumstances the Committee recommended that the appeal should not be dismissed and recommends that the matter be referred by the Council to the Planning and Development Committee for consideration of the matter on the merits. Memo also included letter from Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner, regarding the Larry Howe request for rezone. It noted that recommendation was issued on November 9, 1978 and the normal 14-day appeal period expired on November 23, 1978. However, due to the Thanksgiving holiday the period was extended to November 27,1978 when. Mr. Beeler spoke with Mr. Howe on November 27, 1978 he inadvertently forgot the extension of the normal appeal period. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Mayor's Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented report Appointments recommending council concurrence in the Mayor's appointments and reappointments as follows: Municipal Arts Commission Appointments- Mr. Lloyd Meeks, Mrs.Jackie Aspaas;Municipal Arts Comm.Reapoointments- Mrs. Sylva Coppock, Mrs. Peggy Cummins; Planning Commission Reappointment-Mrs. Barbara Schellert; Board of Ethics Reappointment- Mrs. Mary Mattson; Fire Civil Service Commission Reappointment- Mr. Walt Dragin. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Senior Motion by Shane to give up to $50 off on city's share of taxes Citizens for senior citizens living in their own home. Motion failed for Tax Relief lack of second. !lotion by Shane, Second Perry to refer to the Community Services Committee for study to grant up to $50 off of city's share of taxes for senior citizens, home owners or renters. SUBSTITUTE MOTI']N BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE TO REFER THE MATTER OF TAX FELIEF FOR SENIOR CITIZENS TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Renton City Council 12/18/78 Page 4 Old Business - Continued Public Safety Public Safety Committee, Chairman Trimm presented report Coimnittee- Fire recommending the City of Renton negotiate with Tukwila Protection in regards to a contract covering the southwest-area of Renton Southwest Area for Fire Protection. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO of City CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Breach of the Public Safety Committee report recommended that a new section Public Peace be added to Ordinance 1628 entitled "Breach of the Public Peace. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. (See Adoption of Ordinance #3281. ) ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented committee report recommending second and final readings of the following Ordinances: ORDINANCE #3274 Ordinance was read amending City Code relating to revised Garbage Collection garbage collection rates. First reading was 12/11/78. MOVED Rates BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE:PERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, SHINPOCH,TRIMri; 1-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3275 Ordinance was read amending City Code relating to Uniform inspection Building Code Inspection Fees. First reading was 12/11/78. - Fees - Uniform MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS Building Code READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: PERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, SHINPOCH, TRIMM; 1-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3276 Ordinance was read amending City Code relating to Public Ways Inspection and Property Inspection Fees. First reading was 12/11/78. Fees - Public Ways MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS and Property READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: PERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, SHINPOCH, TRIMM; 1-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3277 Ordinance was read amending Ordinance #2072 establishing a Equipment Rental new list of equipment rental rates to be effective as of • Fees January 1, 1979. First reading was 12/11/78. MOVED BY STREDJ.CKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3278 Ordinance was read creating and establishing a special fund Reserve Fund to be known as the "Cumulative Reserve Fund for Unemployment Unemployment Compensation". First reading was 12/11/78. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Compensation SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following Ordinances for first reading and to advance to second and final readings: ORDINANCE #3279 Ordinance was read amending a portion of City Code relating Amending License to license fees and penalties for late payment thereof. Fees MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. After readings .it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: PERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, SHINPOCH, TRIMM; 1-NO SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3280 Ordinance was read vacating a portion of alley in Block 11, Alley Vacation- Car Works Addition. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE TO Block 11, Car ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. After readings it Works Addition was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE VAC-8-78) AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.