No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-272n i r'........ . 2..• ....-- r__ 44) . 6.1 1. E...,.;‘) r... 1,6.1:::, U i/i.cs J.is ir. ., 1 l*.. ti N L LVµ , wry yigg L`• rot. .t ig t i:. al it 1 In 4. „,/, ...... C., -: 4: S: 1 0 009 r i 1,5".......---( 7 IP tfeN SlitatIt t. •1 PL. i 111.G. , A ,‘) 0. - \Is *I• :--. • L r11111 i; 1 tit611 /4\gt; i s 01 1! fa% ii...._,_ Q' RECEIVED A:,. .._.___., ..,....„ CITY OF RFNTON NEARING EXAMINERi .,/fre L ., ?,, e. 11 .„ ..,„ , ll A.. 4._. 1 iNgia. 1 : T T l 4711 i k . 1 V , (.3-: i V AL 1 C 1 — .,.t1r__ . _ 42 i 44 Iaa m .1 m 1 g..2 72 IP 7/ s iIII' 1 froe I i y 1.1 C^ 4L- 4rY.5y_ il2!L3 D24 Z$ _ il I J L. 4' Nr.tpi tw,,,ar r.— _• _ iwt • e J!_K a is..t n —>-* ir'w?a .,.ems —cii 41, i W l 0 13 I a o° o' er C°" o' ce' o °yam 0 7V 7 Q 6 . r I I o I I o ,, l it ,f,o,', e , 2 3 , r 8 •e n a 8 I' , wr o 2 W E •..... I ITH„,e S t° _ „' I vls:1. 1 1; I. 1P,1 i'-• -4.'.•-:•tl. -----t';;;- ".:------,t-4 r' 1 I k 777•11"-:..7-.77-e.-7,- - —- lt i• v ,.•,0 .• • •, -----7. . ' I 1 a. 1 ,e,‘ 4. io: 4 a•.• 1 6_4. _.,0 JP 40 Al 4- ". "'" Z.i I. J Z.;, Cr •---/-- 4-10-T- ' .‘141 T 0,0 - T '..1.....1. V, .0. Z 7 0'. 4 •' 1 j. '-• 1 N r.4.. 1 teit. S' O''., . 1 , 37./.‘ , 21) i• 0 c.'‘ -' - 4. a , u-, 2. . 6. 0 -- t. ‘ 4/• 111- 4. 4. 4)(J, tri' I,' -.•.• r 4 • r•' -601 04.4 A . r I I 1 . I . i% a 4 I c V At6litAi#A2 v) L. 1p.. 1 , , c.._ . . e _ cs la. -..:-.,. . • .,, A. 1 1 . i• 4,01._,:.;;• • 4--,...; • Al N, i-• .- I. 4 , I -tic...—. • ,-.---.:-. II a P4 . f."-"-- -- el ---__.:1". I••!:4'—'— t"""- , ,-;.••A"' t 41 a% 4,4. Si r...•1 ••• ' ' • • -1'• 4. Z..(4"'..”.•' 0...w E ' 1111 1 tirillr , 1 0 111111014111...Z•-••• 1 i'. 4 1 . 1 IIIIIP:I. , • it 49! si: RECEIVED1 ‘116 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 24. .._. 12 . 1 V/---.., • (..74;:\4. • - I Y.1 A 14 4. FEB2 71979 v. , • . 3..P!. , — 0100.0.6".. IP . . Leika 1- -*_.. 1""' 1•11112k P I" Al! 1' t -P - - RR .----CO. - --TRA• e 4! _..5: ank - fr I 111211121314151 s•:.. --- s_; ,. Ili .. 111,u4 V I Nig I 77—' — - - r- iiiii,Ar 1 ' ' 9 i I I4Ianmg 1. 1 t, It c) 0."• ci. '• EX NO. 5----------- Mo.I i 1 v ' Mb, 110-4e---norm.' *. 41•11***08112•11" 1 I T ; I 110. ie-_-----------2----272- 7011 9 ,., 1•• towww. wimen.......i) .._7,14 __ ',1.II, _. i r. utl 61 i 1 _ LI N I 1 • 1.. • 44 ' •• _" -.. . - ''. Ji"A raffirgrie .....!. * k Lli . . 4 : 0 ____y_r___. i •s - •• Cal". li-1 NO,97 X iai P • 13 Oa ,, oc,A0 ,_,0 %,..:.. 0,,,,.. c 61W1 > , . e6 • / '''`'0 • o • o , I.. v • t• 10 11 . 12 et , 612:• r.oVA° 4. ::-. 71 I . , 4 w N..- 7fTiT'7r7• `- 11 Z 1 `/ 0 •.. liu.. cr Wire——1---.4":"—T- 4;7 7 - 40 fel:, f0t •Ar,.... " . ,t 4.0 Clt •, 4N 1, ...,-- , 11141 a f !!% , s 411' I). ' jili ttNTUL iii,,,..,„,„, . 5 ri1'iti15 jJ r JO i 1111C1111. 7.. 11 i C At411Aifit2 - ii . da. t... fat J 1.6 0 ? 1 1 4111111 ii,k vitsiaraiA ..•rtil Air J\ ,4- i,t,-. 4 k. z iv r__ oO, l •* t 1 T I.--- P.. L.,.-....:— I r—{/- {/' F---- tT}('/\ n2f f .iY eI A .PJ..O_ E. C..7-, E, F ,_' tg—TL.0 mil. _7-fY I • iL 3 4 1. RECEIVED 11. 1 e 1 a._ ..- i CITY OF RENTONlauallc'i r 6;7`'. i. a. HEARING EXANi IER z • . "i ,. i; s FEB 2 71979 7 1 8 191 6111fid2nl I213141516 ii, , . . I.-' oZ r.,... ' S C117i. i, Wn1 j L_ al Iv" - - j- mli A. C'•11 1; ,,r - 1 fil°I I1 vj' 5 It tI ! "tll w Vr/'r` 1•00 i , t :t I . 10 r 1 E 0 1‘ 1. 13 I 1 tY O. z o i W I ` s 2 so o A o IT I O. / 777 . Q 6 7 aW• o w all 12 o1S i y onto 2 3 4 5 _ 1 `` ` r' 4t,. I 10_. Y T'LI C••T9 i R• / 77_79 1 55 q 2\.v i , 47.3 IS f`D41 if ocP D I : 1 .,. 1 SHOPPING z \ '' --- 411:* 1 :: 1 ' CENTER Ilf 1 j G S se : A 1 T i Or. t • 1 . `ij :;LH L i< '{ 1 ti'7 G. to:. . 4 u; a in); i r, 1 I fi 4 ,._ - n .....___________._____g_;_r_. 7 I____.`2'./.___;__.____.A., ___, ''_iT=.1, di'''--Vj - il IrtIDR R S w r_Z i iJ• i- ITto r.U j j _) I ii in-'•,) N 4 iu I i Y /-ram\ e-•7-r-4.crx.'i,...• . t,p ri h. \ ; cs, I i iNij, hi s'frLY — - —— 3,p{ cn U R E N TON ) WAS H FR` SCALE 10_ 40`RECEI IFD'o 2 RECEIVED Tar-AL 6, ccks FEB 15 Is7: i CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAM NER j•` PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , File No : R-272-79 JANUARY 23 , 1979 PAGE TWO E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : Relatively level with only slope rising east-west at southwest corner of property . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture , row crops , berries and urban development . Ragnar- Indianola association , sloping RdC ). Slopes are 2-15%. Permeability is moderately rapid to rapid ; runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and urban development . 3 . Vegetation : The subject site includes scrub grass and black- berries together with a significant stand of Douglas Fir and other evergreens . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : A small stream flows through the middle portion of the property in an east-west di ,'ection . This stream ultimately becomes part of the Honeycreek/May Creek drainage system. 5 . Land Use : The site consists of two single family dwellings in the northwest portion and undeveloped land in the remainder . F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists of a variety of land uses . Commercial uses oriented towards the intersection of Sunset and Duvall . Multi -family uses are located to the north, south and southwest of the subject site with low density single family residences interspersed along along Sunset Blvd . The area can be considered in a growth transitional area from single family residence to higher intensity uses , principally due to the influence of the major arterials . Existing platted single family residential areas are located generally south and west of the subject site . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main exists along Sunset Blvd . N . E . together with a 12" sewer main and a 12" storm sewer. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue N . E . and N . E . 12th Street within 2 mile to the west of the subject' site . 4. Schools : The site is within 1 mile of Honeydew and Sierra Heights ELementary Schools and within 2 miles of McKnight Junior High School and within 4 mile of Hazen High School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within 1 mile of Kiwanis Park and within 1 mile of the proposed King County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary Schools . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729 (C ) , General Classification District . 2 . Section 4-708 , R-2 , Residence District. 3. Section 4-709 (A ) , R-3 , Residence District. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 23 , 1979 APPLICANT : ANTON & MILLIE E . ALTHOFF FILE NUMBER : R-272-79 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST : The applicant seeks approval of a rezone from "G" to B-1 to permit future commercial use of the subject site . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF 2 . Applicant: ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF 3. Location :On the south west corner of Sunset Blvd . N . E. and Anacortes Avenue N . E . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property :3 . 82 acres 6 . Access : Via Sunset Blvd . N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning : G" , General Classification District 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : G" , General Classification District; B-1 , Business, Use; R-2 , Residential Two Family ; R-3 , Residential Multiple Family . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification :The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or ' near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To provide the zoning consistent with development of a fast food restaurant and an additional commercial use to be developed later . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2408 dated May 27 , 1968, at which time the existing G zoning was applied . The site was within a general area which was the subject of a Comprehensive Plan amendment on March 9 , 1977 by Ordinance #3112 . The property adjacent to the easterly boundary was rezoned from G" to B-1 and R-2 by Ordinance #3152 dated August 15 , 1977 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , FILE NO : R-272-79 JANUARY 23 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 3 . The subject property is a portion of a larger zoned area which currently provides a separation of ' B-1 zoned parcels at Duvall and Sunset , from similar B-1 zoned parcels at Union and Sunset. To the north and south are existing developed R-3 parcels . To the east and southeast are vacant R-2 and SR ( King County) residence areas . To the extreme southeast is Hazen High School . The Comprehensive Plan identifies "minor retail centers or neighborhood shopping districts will be located near the perimeters of several neighborhoods and at the intersection of major roads and and arterials . " ( Emphasis added ) (Land Use Report , 1965 , Commercial , page 11 . ) Approval of the subject rezoning would conflict with this goal in that it would create a continuous strip of commercial activity from west of Union Avenue N . E . to east of Duvall Avenue N . E . Such strip commercial development would encourage small scale commercial uses inviting numerous driveways , high traffic circulations and increased turning movements . This situation would appear to directly conflict with the Arterials and Streets Plans Objectives (page 3 ) : a . Provision for safe , efficient and covenient movement of peoples and goods . " b . Arterial ---patterns---complimentary to the general land use plan . " c . Adequate and safe access--- (for ) efficient utilization . " 4 . The Comprehensive Plan clearly indicates a separation of land uses in this area including buffers between commercial uses and between commercial and single family areas . The subject property is identified as being for Medium Density Multiple Family or R-3 zoning . The R-3 District would provide for approximately 110 dwelling units on the subject site . 5 . The land use designation of Medium Density Multiple Family appears to be consistent with policy statements of the Comprehensive Plan , including " In medium and high density residential use districts---other compatible uses may include--- shopping districts and other functions which are not detrimental to the maintenance of desirable living conditions . " Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 ) . 6 . It should also be noted that the Comprehensive Plan states that residential uses provide for preservation of "natural features and amenities--- (which ) should be utilized to best advantage for the use and benefit of the community. " (Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 . ) The site with its centrally located stream and interior stands of firs lends itself to a well designed residential use. Preservation of the stream and vegetation is crucial to the attainment of the highest and best use of the site. 7 . The Fire Department indicates that the proposed use must meet fire flow hydrant location and. access requirements of the Department. 8 . The Engineering Division has noted that upon future development that Anacortes Avenue N . E . must be improved and dedicated and that storm water retension and clean-up of Honeydew Creek is required . 9 . Other departmental comments are attached for consideration . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , File No : R-272-79 JANUARY 23 , 1979 PAGE THREE 4 . Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business District. 5 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading Ordinance. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Pages 17-18, Objectives . 2. Policy. Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 5 , #2 , Community. J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Rezone of the subject site will not have a direct impact upon the natural systems . However, future development of the site will disturb soil , vegetation and the stream, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures these impacts can be mitigated , however . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : The proposed rezoning to commercial will provide for those interactions associated with commercial uses . If the Comprehensive Plan designation of medium density multiple family is followed , new neighborhood interactions , friendships , and social ties will eventually take place. L. .ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significant impact has been issued for the rezoning only. , This declaration is based upon preservation of significant trees and incorporationof the existing creek into future development plans in a manner satisfactory to its natural character. M . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. N . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject proposal is for rezoning from G (Single Family) to B-1 (Business ) in an area shown on the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan for Medium Density Multiple Family . 2 . The subject area was reviewed as a part of the 1976 Comprehensive Plan amendments for which the medium density multiple family designation of the subject was retained . The specific comprehensive plan amendment related to the property to the east now developed as the Central Highlands Ernst-Albertson ) . The Land Use Committee of the Planning Commission considered five ( 5) basic land use alternatives for the properties generally between Union Avenue N . E . and Duvall . Avenue N . E. The Committee concluded that without a more comprehensive approach that it would concentrate on Sunset and 'Duvall , however , the Committee ' s recommendation clearly identifies a Medium Density Multiple Family separation between those commercial uses generally at Sunset and Duvall , and the commercial uses generally at Sunset and Union . The Committee ' s recommendation was adopted by the Planning Commission and ultimately by the City Council . MAILED TO: Anton & Millie E. Althoff 9610 Titon Drive Seattle, WA 98117 Larry Brown 2112 3rd Ave. , Suite 401 Seattle, WA 98121 iv ci'ogri 1.0041i in 1.•Mil illi MID UN • 1 i 5 E 10I 9T 11l'.0% .i•1_ S. T at f 0 w 14 st •v y s.1 a Q s., ,ex, "L_U I Ib. 4 •o .a 9, cm I 3 iO4,.. aJT N i IS 3 . .® It IWI + I ta ,ixxxxx.a R LA I II x,'i R 3 r .' t R-2 Gp II ] 4( c. l''' '''''''‘' N2j71 Crol Hl as il•min Lam tsY!1 •i rak dei. 1IEE 5` '' N I F IIM ST ` .. 3 1, . . xx x•f 14 JQIt°' , - Azo a 1LLL t.7l,T zj r . I n ® y aS a " WI {\ .L L.I•..,., , 1 1,-. y f 1 f wF,,ll1' ' i yy I i 7 rks- e z , L1191...,,,q- .,x. - • •,. ..lay L_ N 4 I O MI T 1 I• o® 1 1 a• .,,` 4..,.,............. L Z II a 1t r - n,.......a...., s r.-+' 7 1I REZONE : ANTON ALTHOFF - R-272-78 APPLICANT ANION ALTHOFF TOTAL AREA ±3. 82 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Sunset Blvd . N. E. EXISTING ZONING "G" - General Classification District EXISTING USE Single Family/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Future commercial use of the site . 1 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family 6 COMMENTS a f s• PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , FILE NO : R-272-79 JANUARY 23, 1979 PAGE FIVE P . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the foregoing analysis , approval of this proposed rezoning be to R-3 , Medium Density Multiple Family and subject to the following. conditions : 1 . In order to preserve the natural amenities for incorpora- tion into overall residential development , plans for clear- ing or grading shall be approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments . 2. To the maximum extent possible , and to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments , Honey Dew Creek shall be retained in its natural state and incorporated as an amenity in the total development plan for the site . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Finance Department 0 Fire Department 0 Library Department Park Department 8//gerice Department Public Works Department 0 Building Div. En gineering Div. ((Pleaseyverifywlegal descriptio 0 Traffic Engineering Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee)esignee) DATE : PLE SE REVIEW THIS AP LICATION FOR : APPLICANT : A) kid LOCATION:4/ Oder0Z APPLICATION(S) : /`' 4,121, e— 27146 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY: ye REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department:U Approved No Approv Comments or conditions: EA L""y° CI 1 L t K .Cr I....., fJ•'"4'"Y "^ / 7w' Q/J'f-tl U'r. mod/cQ e/Gc) Gv 01/2 Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date 1 El. -... ,....0, :, . .r:...„,,-..4.. i L r-' 1--, r- - r • a E Gs 9,•:.,.- SS 'Ge, Coq .r.- . 137 IA 441.3 0i..:oa\-. / sF,',. ...--/..// ."`••••-' s----) _ ---- 1?, • dr.94.4,...Z A.; C... -..._, i ...3e, 10......- ‘,.. e.• • .,,;-, - s..ili .5. 1, • - •si....-_..,• ---.‹...,..,..? G.& e,„z 7 / 3; • • -- ----. ---------12t---• ------------,n 41.4or 1/9z i 72 / 451,4b„_- r tA3 / Ba 33 II I 0 COMPREHENSIVEp...A..7.-- , , • ..,, -2. litV .2., z, 0,,4 • 1.... PLANt L., Ar 1., . . ., i7i, 7S k 4. Vi i'r ' : .: .i:ii::*•: :::::::::.•iiir of -a 4"C•• 1 I J.,4 ••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:. •.:•.•:•:•:•:.. Ailif .0 70-, el11144/ZP,1/444, I A- . •*::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•.:::::::::.: :::.i::::.•:.:•:::.:i.,ii r..•i 29 , .• ix ac,. ri7.111.i::'....•::::::: iiii::.7. . si.;s/;C:11'-::9 •• l 4>.:,., 6#2 7 Ze, OP. *le11::,,,•::::.:„.:.::::.:,:,:,ii;182_, ,, s. si,s,s. Sc:49 Artilreig°. 0- .f; .}%.% .1i.i.a.„ , ,... 2..-isrq- % 1 i ,;:if,::::•:•:•:•:-'ff:•••••••:•:•"•%-:-.:4 :.:::::::::::::' 1/%6/7?ST yx.x.:.::•:-:-:-;-:::::::•:•:11: Els.F...,. ,0--,.... p,..... 1 ,,•:iiiiiii:iE..:**,:,:i:E;i:i::;:i:;:i:E:..i:i::E:E:1:E:i ntzitsliatts•iGII-iligi 5 : 4 I 3 I 2 Itkt1, -- fr..rizet-c:r-t6-.21-tx.I I i 1 x.:.. .. 7...:.:. os... •41. . •.. ••lo. ••••• •,., ...., , c ::.,•••15, #°°... 1 I ei:i4:i:i:•i•i•i•••:•1•i•:.: ::• .•• .!:•:•:•:•::•:;•:•:•:•.:.:::::::.:.:.::::::::*:.:.:.::::::::: :::::::::::.:.:.:T::.................'" ...........:....... ::::.: I t.:%:••••••• ...•••••••••••...:::X.'tie.e.:.:.:.::•:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::•:•:•:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::•:•:•:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.::•:•:•:•: 6:•:•:.:1:. :.::::, ::•:•:•:.::::::•:•:•:•:.::::::::•:•:.:.::::::•,:•••:•:•• •:•%tn:•:•:•:••:•::::.7...:,•:•:•::::•:.:•• .::::•:•....:::::::.:::•....:::::.. .:••:::•:•:•::!::•:•:.:.::::::•:•:•:•:1:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::•:•:•:•:•:4•:•:•:•::::::::•:•:•:•:•;••: •:•:•::• •::::::•:•:•:•::::::::•:•:•:•:•::::•:•:•:•:•::::;0:::•:?:%•;'•5:::::::•:•:•%::::::: :•:::::: •:::::*:•:::::::.::.:*.:':•::::.::Mnx.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::.:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::,...:..%.:.:. :•:•:.::::::::•:•:•:•::::::::•:.:•::::::::,•::•Ok;:•:: :;%::;::::•:•::::::::::::•::•:•,:•::::::::•:.:•• ::::::::::::::::::".::%.:.::::: Li74:!*::::::::.x.:.x.:.:::.:.E::::::::::::::•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::::::•:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:::•::::::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•.:: ::::::.: :I::::::::::.::::.:::::::.:.::::::::.7'7.1...:.:':"..‘;.:-..:1.:::'.:.::::::.-:-.-:-:::-:::::.:.:::::: .::::'.:::::.:::::4::::::.... II X::PX:::::::::::::::::::k:X.X.X.°°:::::X.X.::::::::::::: ::iiVV.: :::. :::::::*:::::*:::::*::: :;:'::::::::::;::::.:;::::::A°::::: :•:::::::::::X:::::::.i:!.!:•::•:::::::::::::>:*:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•::::•3%*-•-::•::•::::.• f. ?:::•:::::::: 1i1::::f!:if:r:::.::::i*:::::::12*i:::::":**::::::::::.::". ' MI i..; .: ::::**:i*i*:.:::*i:::K:i:1::::::::::::K:i*X:i::::::::::: :::::::i:K:::•:::::: : •;•••;; •-•-•-•••' '%..". -:;:;-:-:-:*:1:1:1*::::i:1:;*':'i*:i*:::4• * i:i:i*:::•1::*1:::::::::*i:•:::::::::::::::::::•:•:::::::::::i:::::::::•:•::::::::::••::. •:::•:•:• :::7?:1:::::i:::•:•••::::••k%::•::::::::•::::::::::::.:::::::::::.:::::::. •i 1••• ••••. ..... e.e.”. 1••••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•••• :.: ••' ;•;...7....x.e...:.:•:-:•:.:.::•:•:•:•:•:•::::*:•:•:•:•:•::*:*:•:•:-:":.11x-x•x-:•:.•:-:.::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::...•. "•:•:•:.:•:•:•::•.",•:•••••:•::: ••:-.:::e:•:k-::::::.:.:•:•::::::::•:•:-:-::::::.:.:.:.::::::::.,":. ' ' 7...!::::::::::.:-:.::::*:•:.:.:•:.::':*:-:.:•:•::+:*:*:•:.:.':''':'': 1 i:,,,,,,::::::::::::::::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::, :.:::..:. 4„...,g:444•:,::„:•,:•::•...:•:•:•:•:•::•:•::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:„.•:•:••••, 2.1t• A'..V.:.....W.....:4.:.::::•:•:•:•:*:•:•:`:..*:•:*......:*:•.*:•:•:•.....y.:•:'....:.'....".. . •:....:*:.:*:.: N.:*::.:.:.:*:*::.:.:.:.:*:*::.:.:.:.:*::.:.:.:.:4: '4:.:•:•••::*:•:*:•::::::.:::::::::::4:::::::1::::."`:NY:'•.::.::&...*4...din,.. :.:%:............*:* 4*:....i:::::*.*:.::::::..*:•:*;::*::°:*::::*:.:.. : 1//// 11i:•::..1:::::. 7:'.`.::::: '.::::::: :.:.. X*X*:*.ft*:*:WW.WA::::W"..%*:.$0. W :e*:::X.:.X.X.: ..:..5:::::::::::::4;.::::::::::*:.%.:..../.... 4. 14.:.:•:•:':::*.*:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::::•:!...:!."...........:`*.'.V.:::......!.':•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:P5•:•. ..................*:7,•*,•.•".-",!,•••••••:•.•:•:•:•:,•:•:•:•:•:•,i.:•* .,. .::**4.>:•:•:•:•:.t 1.4••:141:•:•:•V•:•••••:.•:•:..•:•::................ •.• ..•.•..•0•••••••• 1111•!'1 '7:::::::;*%:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•-•:•••:•:•••••••:•:•:•:•••:-.•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•••••:•:•;•• •:•:•:•:•:•:•::':•:•:•:•:• n •1:..*::::::iiii:i*,:::::*,:::::::::::::::•:::..;.:.:::::::::::::.:::::::::.::::::2:.::::•t...•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::::!. ::.:::::.:.:.:: :::-0Mg: ::::::i:iaMniiiii:: -) . 5,:::::;:•:::::,:tn.::::::-,,i.i,-;::.:M,:;i::::::::::::::::*:::::::::::::::::::•'' il';:i:,:,:i*i:::::::::::::::! .:::-..:::::::::::::::.:i•:::::::•:•:*..::.:i•:.::*?::•••••:•::*••,:]:i:i:?••::•:•••::.::.::.:.::: p.., [ ii::.: i:::::::::::::::•::';',:',:"..:::::::::::, , 2•:•:•:•:•:•:•:::•:•:•:•::!:', .-.•:•:•:•: ':*:*:•:•:•:•:•:•:0 1 I.--,...--. - '-'•::-.• F4 53 cauarame,mc::::::::5-. 4.•:: i::::s:;rm:::i::"Mg***E1-, ,:,..P0,,,..:•* Ess En c:si:E:3 1E:3 I=E3 En MO- El J ..' l" •P ig7 f /4-•-• - : - m•Yeiii".."".". 1:1eiesWes..I I t 1 • 0 1.1. , I I 3 r'r ' / ''• . : H '' Z';--' 1 5R , ' / 1t , • . A 11 ::; ,'• .,-. ..'• ' • , . ' ?-1. "N.• I I- H -riio5...HOOL.111ii-----,--,------- ---r-,--i I1', ; _ • i„ 1/4, . ' • i c::•1. , •_';:?.. ' --• 3 4 5 6 7. 6 13 4 I :-.' • , r. I1 i'L.—, 114. 7777-)F, t:!--3.. it. 1,3 to. 2.1 2:. % t• 0 a , I 1 if /LI ...:.;h.J. If.rr , . . . r ,.., ...:,,,,, • . 1.... ,•,--.-••,. .- 30,.,... ••„,..,c • • I 1 :0 t / ,,' • . • . : •rA:-:: • .V : '-• - \ , % .1:21 L"'. 1 .. •.••. •'....,.4.. . I I I \.*3 ..1,5..•.g1.,--2.2,,-- , i.. 1 uE. - : '. -' -°- :io. • ' k Z2} i'-• Ci.. • s: !-------'''': •,'::.. b. ..... 34 i2201. .0.... • fil• il ti 11 I j/ .. IC.1...... S Pl a: - 1 ,_• ii I i s-",----:- T-----‘5:*r ! • '+-4 -7- ---,0 i il a - t3 .,...:f...• • •::.5...C.••• ' 6 ; 9 ;IQ, I, ../.13 Air- 1.__________:, • u 7---- ‘.:i'----4-41-' 1. i / ••• / • .. ' i ' • / kirst-41m. 411 MI latl Inp Illa s', _la]Erg EMI CM Sta 1SINCII-E FAMILY LOW V5N5IfY M111.11 FAMILY i . .. elif H----,,, I • 45PiUM MNStrY muvri rAmivi ZWA•15., 141 1.-6 41;1148fr: -..-- • . • FrA PL461.16/guAsi PuE3L.u. • ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department O Park Department 0 Police Department O Public Works Department 0 Building Div. 0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptic Traffic Engineering Div . r)( — Y Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) fe ataut4 DATE: 1 JNO '9 PLEASE REVIEW THIS AP LICATION FOR: APPLICANT : LOCATION: U/ Mk_ APPLI.CAT ION(S) : 279 C5 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TORTTHEENHEARING E, ' I l .,' RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO T r,'J • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,7 l/ • I Approved EJ Not Approved ter_ Comments or conditions : /.f,,, S/, i 'z_-; /-,/c=,C-_ i,c-_/-J1i`.it-` C-- / //,-C /"-- 6:•• LJ , / /I( ` // ,/, 1 .5 f ) Ci j__;%-c; .L. r ,%7-A-,0 / CC:C ,S S• e:- e-« (- %C" ter /- , c: r r 1(e,) i / "'4:C C'c;i-'C..; /`z IC. e.. `" c; 14 /7 f I.: = % Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department : ur.L( rii; .., C] Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : AL.'' i-e, .. , • , i. l i• ,,•• ' I • :.,,. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENT§ : pep rtment: Approved Not Approved Comm nts or conditions : 4— Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentative REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: C 1:21 Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions: Date S gnature of Director or Authorize Representative ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department : 2.1)A. A roved i Not Approved Comm p r.- ts : 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentative Da e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 4)) ( ' O I__l Approved Li Not Approved Comments : i 0- IL-7 2`f C Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department J Park Department Police Department Gr. Public Works Department 40. :.wilding Div. Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div. J Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his designee) D)- ki tr) l ' eLota4 iq SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 4/9-1 Application No. : 4e.:21? Action Name :, J/l %9' • f / d .. 44, / 0 ' /4 Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : //e # Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :F, ,n 4 Approved C t Approves Comments : A/ la /t 0 7 AI e row 7 c: rAl clrctik-i1- 2) PYDV , n(e S7,4) ,r vn twat_/-G Y.2sfe.-r•- 4Ctw/..L/ / 17"` U-,',-SiT4 3) a/ea,,-r D,4:11` c P,1 CV--ee e we__ e' 'A D 7 e ,e/) 04 2,7 c:78,-;44.______i,.,,,,___„ 77 Signs ure o Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No. R-272-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-419-78 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks approval of a rezone from "G" to "B=1" to permit future commercial use of the subject site. Proponent ANTON & MILLIE E. ALTHOFF On the southwest cprner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. Location of Proposal and Anacortes Avenue N.E. Lead Agency This proposal has been determined to 0 have © not have a si nificant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030(2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and. other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration has been issued for rezoning only. It is based upon preservation of significant trees and incorporation of the existing creek into future develop- ment plans in a manner satisfactory to its natural character. Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Planni . , Dir ",s' tor 0 A Date January 15, 1979 Signature „deli, ' • , ,: `i r City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ®nance Department s Fire Department Library Department II Park Department x ID Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div. QrT .,affic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) etp ) , otiq SUBJECT : Review of ECF- e'l . ; Application No . :golg- Action Name: I/4.,Seel& •, ." 97' Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : Note: Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : I Approved 0 Not Approved Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department:u r meis mentsApproved: El Not Approved om No i M pp f_T o-){-ol n, Y?i-Aat c Ara AGI/7 PA.0134-+JI. atG. 1?/-tTian Slk/,.eerAr.-1 1)/1-41r/44 &ft 13At H . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date OF 1 kgA, deo o THE CITY OF RENTON 41 lip sx.,Mt MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 235- 2550 AoS ' SEP16g4 , January 3 , 1979 Mr. and Mrs . Anton Althoff 9610 Triton Drive Seattle , Washington 98117 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 , 'File R-272-78 ; property located on Sunset Blvd . between Anacortes Ave . N . E. and approximately 360 feet to the west . Dear Mr . and Mrs . Althoff : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 29 , 1978 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 23 , 1979 at 9 : 00 a . m.. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning/Director 7'77 By: , . /1 46;(./(e:fff David R. Clemens Associate Planner cc : Larry M. Brown Western Pacific Properties 2112 3rd Ave . Suite 401 Seattle , WA 98121 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 23 19 79 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. HAROLD M. SYRSTAD , APPLICATION FOR THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL , File 275-79, AND WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File W-276-79; property located on north side of Puget Drive S. E. approximately 1200 feet east of Grant Ave. So. and adjacent .to the Rolling Hills Subdivision. 2. ANTON A. AND MILLIE E . ALTHOFF, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 , File R-272-78; property located on Sunset Blvd . between Anacortes Ave. N. E. and approximately 360 feet to the west. 3. VALLEY CEMENT CONSTRUCTION , INC . ('VICTORIA. PARK NO. 4) , APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR 7.9-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBDIVISION, File FP-274-78 ; property located one-half mile east of the east end of Puget Drive S. E. , just north of Seattle ' s Cedar River Pipeline Right-of-way. Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED :PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 23 , 1979 AT 9:00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED January 12 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION T ,STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST:, Subscribed and sworn to beforq me, a Notary Public, on the Lk, day of i v.dAl ,19 -1rk i1 SIGNED .,,,e__X•e.4~7,/ 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : On Sunset Boulevard with Average Daily Traffic count of over 17,-000 cars. Next to a new 100,000 Sq. Ft. Shopping Center. Land is 3 - 4 Ft. below grade with no trees. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : September, 1979 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : Renton Building Department 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Not at this time 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Copy of Rezone Application attached. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YET— MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X Yt MAYBE 0- e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBETb— Explanation: b) The site_is below road grildP f311 w-01 bp npcps.s9ry tQ el.urinate site 1?].00d$.n9. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON R ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM A ocr> lrb, b' o DEC 29 1918' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. d7a --7f NJ G ot?' • Environmental Checklist No. CT-- -. 0f-71 w PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance O Declaration of Significance ODeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should incluO.e references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review 'with- out unnecessary delay. The following questionsapply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Anton Althoff 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 9610 Triton Drive . Seattle, Washington 98117 Phone: 7A2-7466 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: None 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size. general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Proponent proposes to zone his property which is 3.82 acres from G to B-1. Immediate use for one acre will be for a McDonald's Restaurant, with the balance to be developed in the future. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)?X TES- MAYBE Th b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna?X ver RATITE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X VT MAYBE NY d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? yr MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: As there is nothing on the site now, gny change will increase the noise level', however intended use ig well below required level for this area. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? AlYES Explanation: The parking lot will be illuminated in the evenings until .clQsing.- 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X TE— MBE NO Explanation: The comprehensive plan is vague in this area and it appears that part of the' property is planned' as cornMercial and i some as multi—family. 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES RATITE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions?X YET— MAYBE WU— Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X of an area? Yr3- MAYBE AU Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X ES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES-- MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? - X YES WIFE NO Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YEE— UNITE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X TES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?, X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to Xtemperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Yam— MAYBE , NB f) 'Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters.? 1E— MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions. or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents ; waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? ES M YBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES - MAYBE NB Explanation: Lot will be asphalted with catch basins and water oil separators 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops , • microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora?X . YET. MIT NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NB Explanation: The site presently has long grass and scrub bushes that will .be removed. 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? X YES Wit W- f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YET MAYBE Far Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal- result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES M YBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE N Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? xx YES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: signed ri Anton Althoff name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the _proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: ' a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBEX NO b) Effects on existing g parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES MPTE NO c) Impart upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or X movement of people and/or goods? YES- MAYBE AO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X VET- MAYBE NO X f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, Xbicyclistsorpedestrians? VET MAYBE NB Explanation:Movement particular to a restaurant operation 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES' MAYBE , b) Police protection? X YES X c) Schools? YES MAYBE" NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO X e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBEX NO X f) Other governmental' services? YES FiKTITE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or.energy? X YES MAYBE IB b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE F1 Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in, a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO X c) Water? YES MAYBE NO V CITY OF RENTON REZONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE 'ONLY LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO. CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE , APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name Anton and Millie E. Althoff Phone 782-7466 Address 9610 Triton Drive, Seattle, Washington 98117 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Sunset Blvd. , State Hwy 900 between Anacortes Ave. N.E. and approximately 360 feet to the west 4 .. Square footage or acreage of property 3. 82 Acres or 166 , 399 . 2 square feet 5 . Legal description of property. (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Property is located in Renton, Washington, and known as Government tax lots Number 93 , 97, and 48 located in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 3, Township 23 , Range 5, East W.M. 6 . Existing Zoning G Zoning Requested B-1 NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiat, your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Applicatio: Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this for, in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Fast food restaurant to be located on 45, 000 square fed of site as shown on the attached site plan. Balance of property to be developed later. 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Culvert, Landscaping, Fill where necessary. 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? 45, 000 square foot site to be developed immediately. Balance. at a later date A . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 REAV AF F I DAV I T v REC EI FD p DEC i.119 z C62%t/ / being duly sworn; vclare4 t I am the owner of the property involved this application andta6E5" foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of. my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn beforeme this / L day Of (L!-0111,•( 19'7// , Notary Public in and for the State of ANION AND MILLIE E. ALTHOFF Washington, residing at Q 4 n./ 7.124- Name of .Notary Public) Signature of Owner 8v e )04- 47- - 1-T/( L 9610 Triton Drive Address)Address) Seattle Washington 9811; City)State) 782-7466 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to . conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept. 2-73 1 Date Denied Date Appealed Appeal Action Remarks Planning Dept . a09NiNN Order No. 408613 y; 0' .. EXHIBIT "I" 0 °. C2 That portion of Southwest quarter of Southwest quarter of Secti ©, A,3Township23North, Range 5 East, W M , in King County, Washington,. described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said section; thence South 88'39'04" East 965 feet; thence North 0°59'25" East 250.18 feet; thence North 67'54'55" East 127.08 feet to point of beginning; thence North 5.06'00" East 177.06 feet; thence North 24'35'05" West 49.41 feet to the Southeasterly line of Sunset Highway; thence North 64'57'25" East 284.45 feet; thence South 1.12'00n West 292.76 feet; , thence Westerly in a straight line to a point which is South 5.06'00" West and 30 feet distant from point of beginning; thence North 5'06'00" East 30 feet--to point of beginning: EXCEPT the East 40 feet as measured along the South line, and EXCEPT that portion deeded to King County under King County RecordingNo. 7201270090 for State Highway No, 2. oF7„k CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED ©\ REZONE APPLICATION DEC be197P FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LAND, USE HEARING 9, Z APPLICATION NO. 2•7.9 it EXAMINER 'S ACTION C F' APPLICATION FEE $ 1,34 0-0 APPEAL FILED DE N RECEIPT NO. J,93/ CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name Anton and Millie E. Althoff Phone 782-7466 Address 9610 Triton Drive, Seattle, Washington 98117 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Sunset Blvd. , State Hwy 900, between Anacortes Ave. N.E. and approximately 360 feet to the west 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 3. 82 Acres or 166 , 399 .2 square feet 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Property is located in Renton, Washington, and known as Government tax lots' Number 93 ,9.7, and 48 located in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 3 , Township 23, Range 5, East W.M. 6 . Existing Zoning G Zoning Requested B-1 NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements. ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Fast food restaurant to be located on 45,000 square feet of site as shown on the attached site plan. Balance of property to be developed' later. 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Culvert, Landscaping, Fill where necessary. 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? 45, 000 square foot site to be developed immediately. Balance at a later date. 0. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-7.7 y OF R4' A. as p " ® THE CITY OF RENTONZ. y MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 o 97 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9, 0 ti' 235- 2550 044rED SEPSE4" January 24 , 1979 Mr. Anton Althoff 9610 Triton Drive Seattle , Washington 98117 RE : R-272-79, REQUEST FOR REZONE "G" TO "B- 1" Dear Mr . Althoff : In accordance with your request to the Hearing Examiner ' s Office , your public hearing as noted above was continued to Tuesday , February 6 . As a continued item , this application will be first on the agenda for that meeting . If you have any questions , please contact me . Very truly yours , Gord Y . Ericks n Plan ing Dir, c 1 1(/ t//, 7 r David R. Clemens Associate Planner DRC :wr cc : Western Pacific Properties Attn : Larry M. Brown 2112 3rd Ave . Suite 401 Seattle , WA 98121 PLANNING DEPARTMENT P'RE L'I'MI'NARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER • mPU&LIC:."-HEARING : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , File No : R-272-79 JANUARY 23;.. , 1979 P•AG E:,T,WO E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . , Topography :.. - . Relat-ively level with only slope rising east-west at._ southwest 'corner, of property . 2 . Soils : Altde,rwo.od, 'gra'velly sandy loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid- in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber, ,pasture , row crops , berries, and urban development . Ragnar- Indianola association , sloping RdC ). Slopes are 2-15%. Permeability is moderately rapid to rapid ; runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The subject site includes . scrub grass and black- berries together with a significant stand of Douglas Fir and other evergreens . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : A small stream flows through the middle portion of the property in an east-west direction . This stream ultimately becomes part of the Honeycreek/May Creek drainage system. 5 . Land Use : The site consists of two single family dwellings in the northwest portion ana undeveloped land in the remainder . F. ' NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists of a variety of land uses . Commercial uses oriented towards the intersection of Sunset and Duvall . Multi -family uses are located to• the north, south and southwest of the subject site with low density single family residences interspersed along along Sunset Blvd . The area can be considered in a growth transitional area from single family residence to higher intensity uses , principally due to the influence of the major arterials . Existing platted single family- residential areas are located generally south and west of the subject site . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 12" water main exists along Sunset Blvd . N . E. together with a 12" sewer main and a ' 12" storm sewer. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3 . , Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue N . E . a.nd N . E . 12th Street within 2 mile to the west of the subject' site. 4. Schools : The site is within 1 mile of Honeydew and Sierra Heights ELementary Schools and within 2 miles of McKnight Junior High School and within 4 mile of Hazen High School . 5 . ' Parks : The subject site is within 1 mile of Kiwanis Park and within 1 mile of the proposed King County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary Schools . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729(C ) , General Classification District. 2 . Section 4-708 , R-2 , Residence District. 3 . ' Section 4-709 (A) , R-3 , Residence District. v,. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEB 2 71979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER AM PM 7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,E PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 23 , 1979 EXHIBIT NO. APPLICANT: ANTON & MILLIE E . ALTHOFF FILE NUMBER : R-272-79 ITEMNO. I ? 79 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of a rezone from "G" to B-1 to permit future commercial use of the subject site. B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record.: ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF 2 . Applicant: ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF 3. Location :On the south west corner of Sunset Blvd . N . E . and Anacortes Avenue N. E . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property :3 . 82 acres 6 . Access : Via Sunset Blvd . N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning : G" , General Classification District 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : G" , General Classification District ; B-1 , Business, Use ; R-2 , Residential Two Family ; R-3 , Residential Multiple Family. 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification :The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or ' near the site as required by City ordinance. C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To provide the zoning consistent with development of a fast food restaurant and an additional commercial use to be developed later . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2408 dated May 27 , 1968, at which time the existing G zoning was applied . The site was within a general area which was the subject of a Comprehensive Plan amendment on March 9 , 1977 by Ordinance #3112 . The property adjacent to the easterly boundary was rezoned from G" to B-1 and R-2 by Ordinance #3152 dated August 15 , 1977 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , FILE NO : R-272-79 JANUARY 23 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 3. The subject property is a portion of a larger G zoned area which currently provides a separation of B-1 zoned parcels at Duvall and Sunset , from similar B-1 zoned parcels at Union and Sunset . To the north and south are existing developed R-3 parcels . To the east and southeast are vacant R-2 and SR ( King County) residence areas . To the extreme southeast is ilazen High School . The Comprehensive Plan identifies "minor retail centers or neighborhood shopping districts will be located near the perimeters of several neighborhoods and at the intersection of major roads and and arterials . " ( Emphasis added ) (Land Use Report , 1965 , Commercial , page 11 . ) Approval of the subject rezoning would conflict with this goal in that it would create a continuous strip of commercial activity from west of Union Avenue N . E . to east of Duvall Avenue N . E . Such strip commercial development would encourage small scale commercial uses inviting numerous driveways , high traffic circulations and increased turning movements . This situation would appear to directly conflict with the Arterials and Streets Plans Objectives (page 3 ) : a . Provision for safe , efficient and covenient movement of peoples and goods . " b . Arterial ---patterns---complimentary to the general land use plan . " c . Adequate and safe access--- ( for) efficient utilization . " 4 . The Comprehensive Plan clearly indicates a separation of land uses in this area including buffers between commercial uses and between commercial and single family areas . The subject property is identified as being for Medium Density Multiple Family or R-3 zoning . The R-3 District would provide for approximately 110 dwelling units on the subject site . 5 . The land use designation of Medium Density Multiple Family appears to be consistent with policy statements of the Comprehensive Plan , including " In medium and high density residential use districts---other compatible uses may include--- shopping districts and other functions which are not detrimental to the maintenance of desirable living conditions . " Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 ) . 6 . It should also be noted that the Comprehensive Plan states that residential uses provide for preservation of "natural features and amenities--- (which ) should be utilized to best advantage for the use and benefit of the community . " (Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 . ) The site with its centrally located stream and interior stands of firs lends itself to a wc.-, 1 designed residential use . Preservation of the stream anc vegetation is crucial to the attainment of the highest and best use of the site . 7 . The Fire Department indicates that the proposed use must meet fire flow hydrant location and. access requirements of the Department. 8. The Engineering Division has noted that upon future development that Anacortes Avenue N . E . must be improved and dedicated and that storm water retension and clean-up of Honeydew Creek is required . 9 . Other departmental comments are attached for consideration . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , File No : R-272-79 JANUARY 23 , 1979 PAGE THREE 4. Section 4-711 , 8-1 , Business District. 5 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading Ordinance . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Land Use Report, 1965 , Pages 17-18, Objectives . 2. Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 5 , #2 , Community. J . IMPACT ON THE: NATURAL SYSTEMS : Rezone of the subject site will not have a direct impact upon the natural systems . However, future development of the site will disturb soil , vegetation and the stream , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures these impacts can be mitigated , however . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : The proposed rezoning to commercial will provide for those interactions associated with commercial uses . If the Comprehensive Plan designation of medium density multiple family is followed , new neighborhood interactions , friendships , and social ties will eventually take place. L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significant impact has been issued for the rezoning only. This declaration is based upon preservation of significant trees and incorporation of the existing creek into future development plans in a manner satisfactory to its natural character. M. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. N . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject proposal is for rezoning from G (Single Family) to B-1 ( Business ) in an area shown on the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan for Medium Density Multiple Family . 2 . The subject area was „reviewed as a part of the 1976 Comprehensive Plan amendments for which the medium density multiple family designation of the subject was retained . The specific comprehensive plan amendment related to the property to the east now developed as the Central Highlands Ernst-Albertson ) . The Land Use Committee of the Planning Commission considered five ( 5) basic land use alternatives for the properties generally between Union Avenue N. E . and Duvall Avenue N . E . The Committee concluded that without a more comprehensive approach that it would concentrate on Sunset and Duvall , however , the Committee ' s recommendation clearly identifies a Medium Density Multiple Family separation between those commercial uses generally at Sunset and Duvall , and the commercial uses generally at Sunset and Union . The Committee ' s recommendation was adopted by the Planning Commission and ultimately by the City Council . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , FILE NO : R-272-79 JANUARY 23, 1979 PAGE FIVE P . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the foregoing analysis , approval of this proposed rezoning be to R-3 , Medium Density Multiple Family and subject to the following conditions : 1. In order to preserve the natural amenities for incorpora- tion into overall residential development , plans for clear- ing or grading shall be approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments . 2. To the maximum extent possible , and to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments , Honey Dew Creek shall be retained in its natural state and incorporated as an amenity in the total development plan for the site . f g 1 1 emEmlim il-Tict-...., Ai . I 1 7-7"---•-• •'1, r 1 —01 SR I W a. • t I 1 7 ..;-,,,,.. 0........... Ag G IND CIO-.5:— iv- - i r.. ... I. .: @ ''' II 0t 46, 16.-. ._ei, .,, 7. ..,:lial-mi fl I I::•::::-, . ,. .8.--r, ' .... 4.:.:\ C':‘ ,,;c/,,' " ,. \ :\. \IT 1...-(.21.1.-? 1, • — ' 6'1,,,,, ..,,.N I 4...., tr-1, Fil 4 11,i1 i 3 1T171_,Irjri,m _ 1 R 4 S t,. .,1)... a. . 5.4 IMP UM.CMNLti mi I...1, 41 1 0 BI7•--:; c.::. R,.'. ,—.-,:: 4:.,. 47„7.: 1,:..:'.:•..‘•1',‘.' 4,,.• i—T----._--- t7o.:•, 1. z.o, ffl5So). I.. 0v. t. 4 S;I 2t,,,2Xy1..9.,io1Z:7-qS. r. iAattc..pia, sSpio iE 2p 00Wt111,49 I. — 1 i A _ 11151 ST Zi Le 0 ty.-..t:,,,, .: 1 3: • w,.. 1,.-• L'I'n.°1-."".111a•?',...d..: .,: r.- g •' ' i ----NA,ii-, ,-. . ---1,?, ., 1 r--• ] r ` —r• ..) S 111 , 31.4 5,.i,4 t L 5,47"z • • '5' " ter tt, t JI1',2- 4 r z_.. a, I- 1• 1m!.„...,.,,S,, rO.ilI,,',,:,i.l.„1. '- s.-i- ..I' i L I : I L . 1 ILI Z I, I14 ),,, I r-.-4' -, I REZONE : ANTON AIJNOFF - R-272-78 APPLICANT ANTON ALTHOFF TOTAL AREA ±3. 82 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Sunset Blvd . N. F. EXISTING ZONING „u - - General Classification District EXISTING USE Single Family/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Future commercial use of the site . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family COMMENTS z..cm.......... ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department 8//gelice Department Public Works Department 0 Building Div. Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio 0 Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) autm4 DATE : I,WIL ' PLEASE REVIEW THIS AP LOCATION FOR: APPLICANT : LOCATION: 0/0 !t66/Z;4( die APPLICATI.O ( ) : 44 60 e9- IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING: E f RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY: l % %; REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: p partment: Pp 61,,A.t • 010 A roved No Approv Comments or conditions: 1, , - Vc JQ L`"g 0 r/Ld 'rL IV/14. e/a..) 9/7 Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date q3 '' \\ G' 42 /' 35 - - __. . -..-. ..--- or/'7= G5"43 •\_' ii Nor I135 1130i a-• . ` 7i ,`4 33 ja 9 AT QAish_ 4 3z 3l 0 COMPREHENSIVE 7.e s\ Q r, i. M __PLAN 7 M fr. r IiZ e fa 'G0 4 T 8l rw;s7 GAG59 O 27 2e, } r:;: 3 $2 I ASS Sa53152• Si So`44 ?• i i :{ S i i> .::. JtAINt: f r--- -- ST E. IQ 7'A PI 8 f tTi/0 I 3_r 5;6,? • Ic 1l12113{a`S:IGIIT Ig. 5 . 4 1 3 12 t I s •• ;::::::X.:.6:::; t---- T" " v s-sa- coral ... - q - iva }:::: ••.:.: 0y ••; •:> . r: r ;}.: 1y i i1•: ram •ti'r C•: rr a.p:Y• 1 OJ:•t f: tiff :'f '•ti• f i1' :'t•:::1: .tip::•'+': •.'' ::ii t .'t• i K:.::. t:::.::::::::::...::i.::•:i:,••i:.;:::::::": 4ii:: K:- i.„ 4r!,. o':••...::,...:::::.:.::.:: i...ti;.}..}: :r•v : :;:;: :va} v:r:r:0Elti• r. i 8 i tip titi:i titi.: ti•: FFFYYY I it 5*;:x.:55;:;::::::.::P:551c::::!::':-.':::::::M?::=5:-475 :.• r 11331 6111 1221:1412 C2I 1=13( III----'--.-----'-- .=- t---.:el---14;773- --):::°-:53-151-- - 1.- Elg.s:i:.*::.:.: :::::::::::::::::;::::::::_::::.:::::.;:::.::.A:..:i*,:st:.„.:,;::.,:::;::-- — HA.Z`N SR • ; C 13 ' ./ HIGH SCHOOL. A 4 f•i; z: 1. IL3 1 -•-•mot jJ `; I 5.'G`• • 't3 : 9 ;IQI, ..4W SIN FAMILY i t _ a.® a 1 1 LOW P5N311T Mu1.'(1 'AM1W L Cnii v14 4 `L MEPIUM D N51•fY hluL'f1 IAMILY , J 7 r i/2 Pu131-16/gUA51 PuB1.l- L ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Q Finance Department Fire Departmentg--Library Department QPark Department Q Police Department f' O Public Works Department Q Building Div. QEngineering Div. (Please verify legal descriptic O Traffic Engineering Div. d ------ > ,C Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) NUlt) g avaiis DATE : ' 409 PLEASE : REVIEW THIS AP LICATION FOR: APPLICANT : T/,rb 1//d LOCATION: d, 6/0 Jei GilSe-/ L'2I 4W)/ 0 o f APPLICATION(S) : Ae07)//e 4ri;!2 4r e IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING E ) RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY: REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department:_ 7 / - Approved t Not Approved Comments or conditions : //(e.5/. /1 zC / /%-C.- i:Te :/1i`-i`,! ', `. 1'N ; c-c- /- //le:— FC1 C.C.S, , //:_L- /1//J/L/)-L.^l f/ / A-c:-1 e- _c . _.," Date Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: ur.L, r//= 2 Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENT§: pep rtment: z I'C Approved J Not Approved Comm nts or conditions: 79 Si n Director or Authorized Re esenta tive Signature. of REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: En Approved in Not Approved Comments or conditions: Date S gnature of Director or Authorize Representative ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : p- .J J hC' pproved C.._.S Not Approved Comm ts : 174?P Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentative Da e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department :O (: , Approved Li Not Approved Comments : C • ,, L i i Signature of Director or -Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department 40 Wilding Div. 0 Engineering Div. O Traffic Engineering Div. 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his designee) V 4 I d SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 49-1 Application No. :2 TY-- 7? Action Name : A e4 6 11-7/•. 44ie/ Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : /lG. 2:, Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department.: C,,e.eL 4 Approved r t Approve- Comments : . I„ //ye A//'-- 40 /6 ' 5/ I _I .,f Y O v c t,.k.sAC 1 N S C b µliP, i Side "J, /e/ SdZr.A1 ciraik•e1- 2) .PY0 V l kn t JA_/-G-V- Y 2 f t , 3) C./ea ,t 0&L c- J.. TT P 4Cv--e e 1),zi'el .,74.. oe/Ai 04 te) yQGpr' s We.. ®`I Signs ure o Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No. _ R-272-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No .. ECF-419-78 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks approval of a rezone from "G" to "B-1" to permit future commercial use of the subject site. Proponent ANTON & MILLIE E. ALTHOFF On the southwest cprner' of Sunset Blvd. N.E. Location of Proposal and Anacortes Avenue N.E. Lead Agency This proposal has been determined to ® have © not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS 0 is. x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision w.as ma e after review by the lead agency of a -completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration has been issued for rezoning only. It is based upon preservation of significant trees and incorporation of the existing creek into future develop- ment plans in a manner satisfactory to its natural character. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Planni ,. Dir/`tor Date . January 15, 1979 r Signature r',0 * ., ' City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O nance Department; Fire Department Library Department 1 Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div. o T ..affic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) dpi .A vu) e, eiymoi4 114.119 SUBJECT: Review of ECF- eVe'-74ior ' Application No. : Action Name : 410- 1/.. Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : O Note: Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: Approved t Not Approved Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : n s Zj(meAntspproved Q Not Approved Com Mo i a+pA-cT o-ru-ra r. TWA e-r c arawa y./ Pao rzt-rw Ors' rut-snrz.la 5ik orr*--L 011-40.44rcot t3Aft,, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1` L I WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES 2112 3rd Avenue e Suite 401 • Seattle, Washington 98121 • (206) 624-1250 February 6, 1979 r Mr. David R. Clemens City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Amendment to File No. R-272-79 Dear Mr. Clemens: We wish at this time to amend our previous proposal to zone four acres from "G" to "B-1" , to reduce said rezone to one acre from G" to "B-1" per our plot plan attached. Also attached you will find a narrative from ,McDonald's Corporation on the landscaping and screening to be used on this site. Per our discussion on the Public Hearing, we are requesting a con- tinuance until February 27, 1979. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, 41ESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES George Barber GB/11 cc: Mr. Anton Althoff u„„,,'n-m1lir,,l„ t,r c (-,l„,1„uri/ r , PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENT TO THE STAFF REPORT OF JANUARY 23 1979 RECEIVED February 27 , 1979 rr „ ,F RENTON APPLICANT : ANTON AND MILLIE E . A fr EXAMINER FILE'NUMBER : R-272-79 FEB 2 ' 1979AMJITEM 0.11 718,911OJ1112111213e41.5/6 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST : The applicant ' s initial application was for a rezone from G to B- 1 to permit future commercial development of the subject site . The applicant requested continuances of this public hearing to discuss with staff alternatives to the original application . On February 6 , 1979 , Western Pacific Properties agents for the applicant ) submitted a letter proposing to amend the application to reduce the area from the original four ( 4 ) acres (total parcel ) to one ( 1 ) acre at the north- east corner. A copy of the letter and attachments are attached to this report . B . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . We have reviewed the applicant ' s request for amendment to the original application . Although this amendment reduces the potential conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan , we still do not feel that there is adequate justi - fication for the applicant ' s proposed rezoning to B- 1 . 2 . The proposed reduction in the B-1 zoned area will be more in line with the Comprehensive Plan ; however , the proposal still reduces the non-commercial frontage on Sunset Boulevard by approximately one-third . Based upon the specific Comprehensive Plan analysis done for the Ernst/ Pay ' n Save Shopping Center just to the east of this site , it appears that the multiple family separa- tion along Sunset Boulevard should be retained to achieve the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to not create a con- tinuous commercial strip . 3 . Previous Comprehensive Plan ' amendment for the vicinity of Sunset and Duvall indicated approximately twenty ( 20 ) acres of commercial use area . At this time approximately 60% of this area remains vacant . The applicant ' s proposal to extend the commercial area does not appear to be con- sistent with the existing conditions , and no justifica- tion has been presented to substantiate the need for additional commercial zoning . 4 . Should commercial zoning be extended west of Anacortes , the remainder of the property should be zoned R-3 and a significant landscape buffer be provided ( 25 ' to 50 ' ) separating the commercial and residential uses . 5 . We have reviewed the specific site development plans pro- posed for the intended use of the property - a McDonalds Fast Food Restaurant . The plans do not adequately address minimum requirements for separation of the commercial use from future residential use . RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the previous analysis contained in our report of Janu- ary 23 , 1979 , if the Hearing Examiner proposes to rezone the property , our recommendation would be to R-3 , Medium Density Mul - tiple Family . As indicated in the foregoing analysis , the appli - cant does not , in our view, adequately justify the proposed extension of commercial property outside of the twenty (20 ) acre area designated on the Comprehensive Plan . If commercial zoning is allowed west of Anacortes Court, a minimum 25 ' - 50 ' landscape separation should be required between the commercial and residential uses . 3' 0 V.1;,11 V',A9.0'I L AY CI . ., ..,A '. z T T9 t r; l=- ,• , I Li , /G O,mil(r)i .)_ j_' CA \;• .• ...,--,:,,,....-. 1--, 1 3 i vc.') -,-..c.E) ' \•. ••,'•'.';,'';(3). • .• • ire ) • •.. 1 4., 1 I({ 7 ! 1 I I , Li { t'':' I I ‘ 1 /.I, r: . I— • • 1 7-:),s 4,-);'1."..)''.'‘`.. '..] t '; . 114 I e I r• I . i I r, ti i I' 1 I voig- - i,i)e/yor,/e 5• 8-'/U' . _ c-) II, t S•LtQu/O4t- ? ,€ ST/2-;C/FLU.i . ! i Aa..e.-/cry,' (5•.,eer .n) I.. R 8-/o' .. i C-f/NUS /Y/C>,C'A Au3tC/c)q 8/ac4. .•?ne 7 4'-lo' • - o-CIA 11ON IA A; //FC//ur; 32 3301• ` —-\` 1 . E- TNUYA OCCIDENTAL/5 r?;. ._.. } .:- e.t... .;,---. f_.:.. `c-.. , _ AAST'G/Ar4 G>f' 3 ",1/ ----• i -... . y 1'/'fh'•r',..-iy ,57 .J-/14/?4vv2T E...^ ' 44/D L C 4 4// /':-_,: ,\'///i/S( I r SSG 7 2 =47.5 3 51-2\Car. f, rY a! •I l r, Q y-lnc. I ,\.1 f i F1DJ i: o . P I I . I s. SHOPPING c o'\ 1 CENTER r Q 7 1D cL K, I I I • 2,. 6.,..:,•- -,,,,, i r j : 4 ; II c, 8 -4 1,-i.k. 4 f t,,,,,:,,,.. f.- a,; i i i :• j:G, 1 ' q L— oL I ' O• i r-r3— — -. ' ' J 9 i r 27, a J I/ G' r+ ( L I G• 1 1 I L ii T r• 6 J y"'1` I 1: Jr7'Tz o, DoUD Ul' Y 4.)'' 1 li /. ----: i--, 77- I 'L 1 I; '/ i . % 1 1 i d j 1 L.,.:a.•= CL)]Lcti. 1 G I 1.I \ : II ' icy -, .'GI`, 11 N ' IFLir 1• rf ^/ Ic c, q tiJ r1 i i 1 ai W o IIJi—6. i . o D I I in f-_L-`ter:'El)r 1 llJ 1 r0 1— Q RE \ iON , \'\'ASH SCALE IU— 40 i 1I ,_r4 i .I Tare,(,c L23 I 1r c PLANNING DEPARTMENT I SUPPLEMENT TO THE STAFF REPORT OF JANUARY 23 , 1979 February 27 , 1979 APPLICANT : ANTON AND MILLIE E . ALTHOFF FILE NUMBER : R-272-79 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST : The applicant ' s initial application was for a rezone from G to B- 1 to permit future commercial development of the subject site . The applicant requested continuances of this public hearing to discuss with staff alternatives to the original application . On February 6 , 1979 , Western Pacific Properties agents for the applicant ) submitted a letter proposing to amend the application to reduce the area from the original four (4 ) acres (total parcel ) to one ( 1 ) acre at the north- east corner. A copy of the letter and attachments are attached to this report . B . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . We have reviewed the applicant ' s request for amendment to the original application . Although this amendment reduces the potential conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan , we still do not feel that there is adequate justi - fication for the applicant ' s proposed rezoning to B- 1 . 2 . The proposed reduction in the B-1 zoned area will be more in line with the Comprehensive Plan ; however , the proposal still reduces the non-commercial frontage on Sunset Boulevard by approximately one-third . Based upon the specific Comprehensive Plan analysis done for the Ernst/Pay ' n Save Shopping Center just to the east of this site , it appears that the multiple family separa- tion along Sunset Boulevard should be retained to achieve the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to not create a con- tinuous commercial strip . 3 . Previous Comprehensive Plan amendment for the vicinity of Sunset and Duvall indicated approximately twenty ( 20 ) acres of commercial use area . At this time approximately 60% of this area remains vacant . The applicant ' s proposal to extend the commercial area does not appear to be con- sistent with the existing conditions , and no justifica- tion has been presented to substantiate the need for additional commercial zoning . 4 . Should commercial zoning be extended west of Anacortes , the remainder of the property should be zoned R-3 and a significant landscape buffer be provided ( 25 ' to 50 ' ) separating the commercial and residential uses . 5 . We have reviewed the specific site development plans pro- posed for the intended use of the property - a McDonalds Fast Food Restaurant . The plans do not adequately address minimum requirements for separation of the commercial use from future residential use . RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the previous analysis contained in our report of Janu- ary 23 , 1979 , if the Hearing Examiner proposes to rezone the property , our recommendation would be to R-3 , Medium Density Mul - tiple Family . As indicated in the foregoing analysis , the appli - cant does not , in our view , adequately justify the proposed extension of commercial property outside of the twenty ( 20 ) acre area designated on the Comprehensive Plan . If commercial zoning is allowed west of Anacortes Court, a minimum 25 ' - 50 ' landscape separation should be required between the commercial and residential uses . f • -; tj\ I\FSTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES 2112 3r(.1 Avenue • Suite 401 • Seattle, Washington 98121 • (206) 624-1250 February 6, 1979 f('(;1+C TC'1 1- C.) is FE 1 .1 1 Mr. David R. Clemens City of Renton r.`_.D Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Amendment to File No. R-272-79 Dear Mr. Clemens: We wish at this time to amend our previous proposal to zone four acres from "G" to "B-1" , to reduce said rezone to one acre from G" to "B-1" per our plot plan attached. Also attached you will find a narrative from McDonald's Corporation on the landscaping and screening to be used on this site. Per our discussion on the Public Hearing, we are requesting a con- tinuance until February 27, 1979. If you have any questions, or require additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES George Barber GB/11 cc: Mr. Anton Althoff 1 U Il1l!i'I",-1,1I 1)ii1'k1'111,k1' ( s,lllplil1l/ hECEIVED CITY OF RENTON yHEARINGEXAMINEREXHIBIi T_ a O. FEB 2.71979 71 8e9ol0a Ie12a.ia PaoRm ITEMNO. 7 ae 07.PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2 ital., TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION o 235-2620 o co• MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WA. 98CRECEIVED O AfD ct• CITY OGF RENTON HEAXAMINER CHARLES J. DELAURENTI FEB 2 11979 MAYOR AM PM MEMORANDUM 7,€319,10,1101211 12t3,4151£ DATE: February 27, 1979 TO: Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner FROM: Paul Lumbert, Traffic Operations Supervisor ,r,W SUBJECT: Agenda Items for February 27, 1979, Public Hearing Anton A. and Millie Althoff Application for Rezone The driveway access to said site would be more or less directed to Anacortes Ave. NE and not to NE Sunset Blvd. This would help lessen the impact of turning vehicles on and off the major arterial, which is Sunset Blvd. in this area. I can see no conflict with this type of development in the area. We will require the right-of-way on the west side of Anacortes be dedicated to the City of Renton as per previous comments. Gary L. and Barbara J. Carner Application for Waiver of Off-Site Improvements Regarding off-site improvements on Talbot Road South, they should be installed as per ordinance for off-site improvements. This area is at the present time being developed at a fairly rapid pace with curbs, gutters and sidewalks and storm drainage. This would be to the benefit of the general public due to reasons of health, safety and welfare. Dean W. Bitney Application for Rezone Item N4 Planning Department Analysis, Preliminary Plat Approval, 5-foot sidewalks would be required as per the ordinance. They would have to be installed unless a variance was allowed. Item N8, right-of-way along the westerly side of Union Ave. SE would have to be dedicated to the City of Renton and full off-site improvements installed thereon. PL:ad EXHIBIT NO. /° ITEM NO. 7 R-272-79 Page Two The Examiner advised the applicant that conformance to submitted site and landscaping plansmayberequiredifincludedintherezonefile, and inquired if the applicant preferred withdrawing the plans or entering the plans with the understanding that they are• conceptualincontent. Mr. Clemens indicated that although the applicant may wish to address the matter in subsequent testimony, he felt that review of the conceptual site plan was necessary due to its importance, in justification of the proposed rezone. The applicant agreed that the plans could be reviewed conceptually, and they were entered as follows: Exhibit #7: Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit #8: Conceptual Landscaping Plan Mr. Clemens referred to a letter attached to Exhibit #2 received from the applicant which requests application amendments to reduce the rezone of B-i to one acre in lieu of the previous proposal to rezone the entire four-acre parcel. The letter was entered into the record as follows by the Examiner: Exhibit #9: Letter to Planning Department from Western Pacific Properties, dated February 6, 1979 Mr. Clemens advised that clarification of the word, "narrative," contained in.Exhibit #9 had been received from the applicant to refer to conceptual site and landscaping plans. He .noted the preference of the Planning Department to discuss the entire property duringtherezonehearinginsteadoftheone-acre parcel requested by the applicant. Mr. Clemens submitted the following letter from the Public Works Department into the record: Exhibit #10: Letter to Hearing Examiner from Public Works Department, dated February 27, 1979 Exhibit #10 recommended that access to the site be directed to Anacortes Avenue N.E. instead of Sunset Boulevard, and required dedication of right-of-way on the west side of Anacortes Avenue N.E. to the City of Renton. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibits #1 and 2. Responding was: Larry Brown 2112 3rd Avenue, Suite 401 Seattle, WA 98121 Mr. Brown indicated nonconcurrence in recommendations contained in the reports. Referencing Exhibit, #10, he advised that dedication of the right-of-way has already occurred, and remaining requirements by the Public Works Department include installation of curbs, sidewalks and storm drainage upon development of the property. Mr. Brown supported approval of the rezone of the northeast portion of the property to B-1 to provide logical extension Of already existing commercial use east of the site. in relationship to Sunset Boulevard, a state highway. He reported that demographic figures indicate a. three-mile population of 55,000 and a• five-mile population of 110,000 from the subject property. Mr. Brown advised the original choice of development site located at the northeast corner of Duvall and Sunset Boulevard was unacceptable due to receipt of information from the Public Works Department that sewers would not be available at the site and a septic tank would not be allowed; and the subject site was subsequently determined appropriate for the proposed development. Mr. Brown clarified the intent of the amendment to the application to reduce' the size of the B-1 zoned property to one acre at the northeast corner and the remainder of the property to R-3 zoning. He reviewed the current demand for commercial property to accommodate retail shops, food service business, savings and loan institutions, arid banks. Mr. Brown felt the adjacency of the proposal to the existing shopping center On the corner of Duvall and Sunset Boulevard would provide compatibility with the proposed use by McDonald's Corporation on the. subject site and create less impact upon utilities .than multifamily residential use. He also'' advised willingness of the corporation to enter into a 25-year lease contract with option for an additional 25-year lease which would ensure stability of use in the area. Mr. Brown questioned the desirability of locating residential units directly on a primary state highway with a traffic volume of 20,000 vehicles per day. While he' agreed with the intent of th:e: Comprehensive Plan to- provide a buffer between commercial development, he objected to the location of the buffer on the applicant's property which negatively impacts its development potential. Mr. Brown emphasized that the potential user of the property had 'indicated willingness to restrict access onto Anacortes Avenue N.E. in order to comply 'with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to discourage provision of numerous driveways onto a major arterial. He noted that at the time the Comprehensive Plan amendment'was adopted, the existing shopping center at the corner of Sunset and March 6, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Anton & Millie E. Althoff FILE NO. R-272-70 LOCATION: On the southwest corner of Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Anacortes Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF.REQUEST: Applicant seeks approval of a rezone from "G" to "B-1" to permit future commercial use of the subject site. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval to R-3 zone. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval to R-3 zone. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on January 18, 1979. A subsequent addendum was received on February 21, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, 'examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 23, 1979 at 9:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. David Clemens, Associate Planner, advised receipt of a request for continuance from the applicant, and the hearing was subsequently continued to 9:00 a.m. on February 6, 1979. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened oh February 6, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. David Clemens, Associate Planner, indicated that'a second continuance had been requested by the applicant to allow review and possible revision of the application. The hearing was subsequently continued to 9:00 a.m. on February 27 , 1979. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on February 27, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the 'Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, dated January 23, 1979, ' and the subsequent addendum, dated February 27, 1979. The reports were entered into the record as Exhibits #1 and 2, respectively. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibits #1 and 2; and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #3: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, File No. 890-76 by reference) Exhibit #4: Comprehensive. Plan Map for the Subject Vicinity Exhibit #5: Zoning Map for the Area between Duvall and Union Avenue N.E. Exhibit #6: Map. of Existing Land Uses in the General Area. of the Site Mr. Clemens advised that-'Exhibit #3 was the, result of specific Planning Commission and City Council action regarding commercial uses of the' area in question; and the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan had been approved on March 9, 1977 by adoption of Ordinance No. 3112.• Mr. Clemens .indicated receipt of site and landscaping plans submitted by the applicant. R-272-79 Page Four 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43`.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-SignificancehasbeenissuedforthesubjectproposalbyGordonY. Ericksen, responsible official based upon preservation of significant trees and incorporation of the existing creek into future development plans in a manner satisfactory to its natural character. " 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The Comprehensive Plan amendment completed in March of 1977 (Exhibit #3) appears to have specifically considered whether or not the commercial designation on the Land Use Map should be extended westward across Anacortes Avenue N.E. to include the subject property. Review of the record of this amendment indicates that consideration was given by the City Council and. Planning Commission of buffering commercial designations by medium density multifamily uses (Exhibit #4) . Some assumptions were made at the beginning of analysis of the amendment, but the testimony has not claimed or documented that these assumptions have changed relative to the subject application Section 4-3014. (A) ) . 8. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Exhibit #4) indicates the property to potentially be Medium Density Multifamily Residential (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 9. Testimony did not address whether or not significant improvements in the area have occurred since the 1977 land use analysis (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed B-1 zoning does not .appear to conform to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map; however, the map is not intended to be a "blueprint" for development but a general guide (page 2, Section 2, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, July, 1965, and Ordinance No. 2142) . The more specific goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan apply but are not abundantly clear regarding this application. Upon considering together the Land Use Map and goals and objectives it seemed that the map is an accurate interpretation of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Sufficient direction exists in the' Comprehensive Plan to support reclassification of the entire property to R-3 (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . Demographic information and the'.proximity of the northeast one acre of the total property (that proposed for B-1) to the adjacent Central Highlands Plaza (Ernst- Malmo, Pay 'n Save, and Albertons) and southerly R-3 development seem to adequately indicate that a fast-food restaurant might do well at that location. But this locational criteria is not actually contained in the Comprehensive Plan for consideration by 'the Examiner. Land use control and land use principles are essentially the concern in reviewing zoning changes. Not at issue is the existing Central Highlands Plaza Shopping Center and the commercial node that has developed at the intersection of Duvall Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Boulevard. This is the existing situation adjacent to the subject property. The issue is whether or not the proposed one acre of B-1 is an appropriate expansion of this shopping center node. Although commercial uses are appropriate at this general location, 'B-l 'zoning of the subject site would not be an appropriate expansion of the, Central Highlands Plaza shopping area and commercial node since this would not produce a ". . .consistent and orderly development pattern." (pages 6 and 7, Section F. , Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area Report, July, 1965, and page 11, Commercial, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . . Such zoning would not at this time constitute ". . .appropriate use of land. . .proper. . .land use principles, and. . .coordinated development of undeveloped' areas." (page 9 and 10, Summary, Renton Urban. Area Report) . The appropriate ". . .growth patterns. . . " are less intensive use than B-1 in the ". . :best interest of the community and. . .its overall attractiveness and desirability. .'. " page 17, Objective No. 1, and page 18, Objective No. 6, Land Use Report) . The multifamily zoning that is developed north of the site and .across N.E: Sunset Boulevard should be carried southerly and across the site to connect with the multi- family zoning south of the site. This implements the Land Use Map and is an appropriate use of land. . .land use principles and. . .coordinated development of • undeveloped areas." (page 9, Summary; Renton Urban Area Report) . Multifamily isappropriateatthislocation (page 11, Residential Land Use Report) . Prevention of incompatible. . . " strip commercial development and prevention of ". . .premature decay. . ." would. occur in an ". . .orderly growth pattern." (page 17, Objective No. 1, R-272-79 Page Three Duvall was 'not constructed or anticipated, and the proposal bears a natural relationship to the pedestrian and traffic flow which is currently generated by the large commercial center. Mr: Brown.advised that although 'the city has indicated that 60% of properties designated for commercial use are still undeveloped, there are' few actual available sites in the vicinity due to encumbrances by utility lines and other factors. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. . There was no response. Mr. Clemens advised that the Comprehensive Plan amendment, Exhibit #3, specifically occurred to 'provide for development of the shopping center on Sunset. and Duvall, noting that the applicant was the developer of the property. Referring to Exhibit #4, he designated potential commercial use prior to adoption of the amendment which originally ,included a portion of the northeast section of the subject site. Mr. Brown inquired regarding designation of potential zoning on the Comprehensive• Plan prior to adoption. of the' amendthent. Mr. Clemens indicated that it would appear that the previous -Comprehensive Plan designated an oblong-shaped piece of commercial property. which included part of the northeast corner of the. subject property, although the entire parcel had been zoned "G" since annexation.., Mr. Brown indicated his opinion as a result of reviewing the Comprehensive Plan and contacting various staff members that the frontage of the subject site provides good potential for commercial use. He inquired if ,the property owner was sufficiently apprised of the public hearings regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment' in ,the area. Mr. Clemens indicated that required legal publications had appeared in the newspapers although further review would be required to determine, if individual letters .to property owners had been sent. He noted that a petition containing 17 signatures and a number of letters had been received from property owners in the. area supporting commercial development on Sunset Boulevard. The Examiner advised that although sufficiency Of public notice was hot a subject of the public hearing; it appeared .that legal requirements had been met by the city. Mr. Brown reiterated his. opinion _that the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide a general guide to development and reflects,,,the general needs of the people at the time of. adoption. He felt. that development of the shopping center on Sunset Boulevard impacts the potential development of the subject site in its related proximity, and since commercial use had at one time been designated on the Comprehensive Plan, such use would be appropriate. The Examiner referenced 'Section L." (Environmental Assessment/Threshold Determination) of Exhibit #1, which states that a declaration of non-significant impact has been issued for the rezoning only, and•inquired if' receipt of the site and landscaping plans would • eliminate the need for further environmental review. Mr. Clemens indicated that although the subject of.'preservation of trees had been addressed' in 'the proposal, the question of incorporation of the, existing creek into future development plans would require further review at the .time of development; although he noted that the declaration of non- significance would not be crucial in review of that issue. The ,Examiner referenced Section N.2 (Planning Department Analysis)' of Exhibit #1, regarding, Comprehensive Plan review 'of the general area, and inquired if the amendment specifically considered the subject site and whether or not commercial use should extend west of Anacortes Avenue N.E. Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The Examiner requested_a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. Mr. Clemens indicated that the recommendations contained in' Exhibits' #1 and 2 would remain as presented. The Examiner requested further comments:. Since there were none, the hearing on File'No. R-272-79 was closed' by the Examiner at 10:05 a.m. • FINDINGS', CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for reclassification of 3.82 acres of "G" zoned property to one acre of B-1 and 2.82 acres of R-3 property. A fast food restaurant is proposed on the B=1 property. 2. . The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference 'as set forth in full therein. R-272=79 Page Five Land Use Report) . • Multifamily zoning of R-3 would be an ". . .effective control of land use. . ."• and ". . .promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability. . ." (pages 17 and 18, Objectives No. 4 and 6, Land Use Report) . 2. The Planning Commission and City Council in approving the 1977 amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (Exhibits #3 and 4) were concerned about the potential of strip- commercial development occurring between Union Avenue N.E. and Duvall Avenue N.E. along N.E. Sunset Boulevard. A commercial node exists at both intersections with transitional commercial, and various uses occurring in between. To separate the , two nodes a buffer of Medium Density Multifamily Residential land use was placed upon the Land Use Map directly across the subject site. While the merits of this action are not the subject of this public hearing, it is clear that'almost two years ago the policy-making body responded to concerns and exercised land use principles and planning. Testimony did not assert or document that public or private improvements in the area have occurred since, then and impacted the subject site sufficiently to warrant reclassification of the site to anything beyond R-3 (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . 3. Due to the concern of the Planning Commission and City Council regarding potential strip-commercial development along N.E. Sunset Boulevard in this area (Exhibit #3) a reasonable conclusion is that during their. discussions and public ,hearings potential future .request for reclassification to B-1 of the subject site' was considered, however slightly. Additional study of land use in the area was recommended; but their opinion appeared to be that commercial development was not appropriate for the. subject site. . The Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives seem to support their action Section 4-3014. (A) ) .• 4. Honey Dew Creek running through the property should be protected and incorporated into development plans on the site. This natural feature will enhance ".:. .community livability. . ." for prospective residents of the site. (page 17, Objective No. 2, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . However,• the existing condition of the creek on the property indicates that additional study of the attractiveness and interface with other properties is needed prior to requiring that it.be retained. Another natural feature of the subject site is the substantial trees that exist. For the aforementioned reasons, these trees should be retained as much as possible for integration into the development. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of R-3 subject to retention of the existing substantial trees and Honey Dew Creek if possible and desirable upon review of specific site development. ORDERED THIS 6th day of March, 1979. L. 'ck Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of March, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Larry Brown, 2112 3rd Avenue, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98121 Anton & Millie E. Althoff, .9610 'Piton Drive, Seattle, WA 98117 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of March, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon 'Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 20, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request, shall set forth the • specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may; after review of the R-2i4-/9 Page Six record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. 4 i II I 1 t uli 1 E.IlEm I.E,so fa •ir Ts 7•'.. s•-•-"Gil I I S E sr,,", r5.• LIALL•111:71'-'1 il 'I 1!:!'.'4''.#.•':•.':' '! II: '. ..r,I.A...•i g Ir), r-• 2 '.1.2 t•x_. .1 : 1I i 1.-—it • ----- 1 1. 0 p.,,,,..,.._....,.4._,.... 1 I - i•• 1,•,,,, iEJ I f.,...,.....,2i„. .. •,„,.e,,;11„,„ti ,, I 6s ,.. ;', .,,7 4, ;,-.. 7 - IN.1...-\_,I.:.;.•....iy, "7.1i..;,,i; L I; 4. ..... ti I W '17 ilD 7 \ \ \I T, 4 .....- '' ...-- . AV;_iY ,Vle it „ I a' \ \ \ I ii .r ... itr.•. 4.. be k, ir: !tiLin. ..,2,12... iiiss c, . .5 :"/.1..Lse.6•41- o 4 14 Sr.7..: t:".,.,11 ,...,-,,N;JI,E7Vilf•V; IN.I. I R•3 c _.__._...._-_--__—_— R .2 r L,-- NN di m a•I m.• i N, . a ,B-1 i *44.4.° -R-2J uR t 1.1".i....11 7.777.7". -•:rrr-.-.--..7_77:-..1-17_ ... . ..-_,..r.--7.-- i.• Ts i 1.1:1:241 .1 a, ; I t;i. tjt ' •• ?'L." ..! I I • •-• .4 l'ein-i.0 —1 701p.i...., J It ' '1 :57 rIVI. :X-4-41/141sT7 - ''. 1 ... ..1,611.ti...., z,I 'I I 11 I Ii ?- ;., .1' 54 -1- • .,, 111'''t1I,"1". „$ rt.'!11.., 1...E..!1•z L J. q. ...,_. 4 lia..?•,Ph . , -10 .I I e 3`:+ 4-- A---,- Ld! , 46•• • .I.r 4-. - • • • r . I I L.. .. 1 6. 6 o..I • • • . . •.1 r.,t'1 k2j.•.i . • t • I I Z dirrt.•• • I 11Ell4..4••••110...M11111 . I I i I t I t i ,it , I 4....c 1:1 , i REZONE:: 1 ANTON ALTHOFF - R-272-78 APPLICANT ANTON ALTHOFF TOTAL AREA ±3 . 82 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Sunset Blvd. N. E. EXISTING ZONING -nu" - Gerkeral Classificatibn District EXISTING USE .. , Single FaMily/Undevelobed PROPOSED USE ., . Future commercial use of the site. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN ., Medium Density Multiple Family COMMENTS -• , irietlel rsvnt9/ll'i'9nd %f7, 4 iVl1 iWWO2 L- 90 s RnrWd) ihnw •rsNga WniQ3w ç#j4'1I1. 110 - Ilkh '- k1Iwb 51)NIS 1 i t _.. . 1-'- _- - --__,-'_ - r: , ` / , 4• ./ / /' 1 0 d • a :t 1 I , i! ?•Y is •!. •:, !'l t Ii d ry • g - 7 S t+ i t,.,,t y r bS ti3ZNN p Jr .../+ r ..e _-. Y:::•:V::• y. Y:1Y:4`•'•l:tititif:tititi:t:: ':•:ti':ti•:-:• :•!• ' p Y im J.-y -a SJ.7i_"m Oa—d—® '-yYie4.,1•'.'. S. 4t.'}::*C•.:ti:•:::.*::l:\% •ti.ri'1":•:•Y.k.' 1 '{:: :}}:tip:, •{•. ,:!' A t N n:']4 Ye'r:i*i•};::• .. :•t'...:•:.•• ;•:ti '{'•i:ti { ;Y-f r.}Y.C. :r •t r.%w:.y,ri•Yr i 1 J•x•ti r:J• •r vv• Y•. Yn'.''•1M1Y'• 1 r:. J' e 1 r. r•Y :IO J ti y'• I •'...r I : I £ v . S 1911i:t191.511,41I1:1j211I , of.9Ti...c 2' 1G41. lo 9 1 :•'' Imo`- L S N__Gitw1731 - OS 15 LS•k£S'.1 ) r8 8 2 FiM/ a: : ;, Qz cZ ®07 6 ds:Lst's/ 4'e/9 1 N cW10*141.4 . ..:.:'ci.;E':'::.....:•:1 1.:.:::::::!:: 1 .:!...il..!::::.:::::::::::::::.:::.:1':::::::::::;.:::f::!::::•:.:• ,I ez 4.;04,4; •°')4_,y aL w. w 1 '111v1£ 2f N3H3HdW00 '1 ac'03Tftis'q' o-), ,,.., -" 1".tee I Sa I 4uN 2-^y 9, .•% r ,` f a•'• 5 4S, , 21 '''/o. VG/-. . .15J . , -,-' AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 6th day of March 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this 0}- day of e.,1 19 -0 . 1- 0—W Notary Public in and for the State ; `; of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Anton & Millie Althoff; R-272-79 The minutes contain a VAt of the pa ti..eA necond) March 12, 1979 Mr. L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Planning Department City Hall Renton, Washington Re: Request for Reconsideration File No. R-272-79 Dear Mr. Beeler: Pursuant to our meeting of February 27,' 1979 and our review of the findings, we are looking for your reconsideration of the following: A) Ommission of Fact: 1) The fact was never brought up, but you can see, per the attached comprehensive plan map, part of the property is already designated for B-1- zoning. Applicant's request for B-1 to the opposite corner of the property'was to accomplish a more natural and orderly development in this area. 2) This particular section of property that applicant is requesting B-1 zoning for, wass \used until 1970 as a gas station site for Gilmore PetrdlNm Co. B) Misunderstanding of Judgement: 1) It is hard for the applicants to understand that if part_ of the property is comprehensively zoned B-1 and, that there was no public opposition, why couldn't the rezone be accomplished? Sincerely, ars tea Anton Althoff RECEIVE® AA/11 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 121979 718r9:PH12012e34o5 ALA ili8nd 1svnaliI-Jgnd %ffi J gG-GZ : ' ilA Jvv iwwo2 k11Wv1 i11nw A115N341 wn1d. W 111111 J.lila tiliu Aliviv. 1j.1nW 1114Ne Mal [1 J 1 L _a^ommecMm .scses T— — • ° 1IWVJ 31bNIs (l I 1 1: u;' .: 1.:.1.7,1.::‘;:,: t.::-'. - r:.1 1::-.-- :"-47"Til: :-----‘:-4 I.:.ay,."- 7: . yHS11I L?OO 1 CS L NL1IV P Q'l'7 7SY L"..fC.v:v:w::-:i-:•:•':,:;::::y:•••:•ti:46:;:;:::ti• •:::••::mr i s z__ -tsa m ®®m`r, m e 1. mn c.V:4:=::t a :_)=a:c: :•:: : ti•:xu 8 ti;:v:t;::;%;}.ti%; v;{:%y'.:.:{•:n.•i{{Y.:if{:{f A n:::.•.• In : .Y• ti..wf ti rf,: .•';y':'ti'a:F: it}'}:'•:•::.Y ;.:•.•:'i'} :•••- rAS•J A•Y. yy{•:• :k:I•k{3:%:; ' s r r•::} ••.•:;,•{ tiii:.•{,:}?: Y' II 1 J 4:,f{}:,.:: 3;..::::•{'• ':{::x Yi::,,.. 5...::.•;>}r.}r J-,::::,,'] i}-,: r ii f r• r t. r.rr YYA•r• YIr:Y•' J.•.•.-0 t......6i:::.... . :,••.. :• .. :.:...:.:;f..r..f: v.:::yy j:y I:r J•rw•'fa YfJJ• Y .YJ3 r•r .riJ r•J arS rJ;}ri: .r n ;t j fr• ':! .v'may/[' ' i! +tFr y,•:Y•.:! r ,..•••!f:.ti'•. tv.B R YS •. Y• r P •• r:. Y:. '• J . ems{}• S'•!•: r J'`'%''::`:•'•'•':'.'.':•}: y Y•` r" n :{. 1r;}[! ?}Y+"+•••• $'•:•' r • K• ifs 54 jS fir — a 41a`-a T 1 1 l ii J ` 4 N' l £ v c 1ar Lt 9t 5l>r fr Zr r Or' r 1 r r 1 I ll/ o-•s + ,?!;,'?''•,.yC ' k.. y7 ;f r}.S'r917 g LS j .b+X R r4 8 5 IS lSyE• S 8 C8 K eiVaetif u 6; 22 Lz 47,6) L, - .....„.‘,,!. .._,, ii.L.,•...,, ,,,/,,,g, „ 3 l I S1J3H32i l'J00 v, d a 1 r£ 2E ti Y, ct Si `_ . alt nil_ f 4 l 1E 7V g•ar .ON c / /) 4b S.) \7 78/i•4o a \.t r ---7 /\._. ,i f '_s / • oc 2£, L" e' J a./ 5t . :G e3 1 oF. :.R4, . A. • ... . , /11' THE CITY•- OF' RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200'MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 . . . 0 ..... .. vs.. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 1741) SECA"' March 13,• 1979 . Mr. AntOn Althoff . 9'610 Triton Drive Seattle, WA 98117 RE: File No. R-272-78; Anton & Millie Althoff Request for Rezone. '. Dear .Mr. Althoff.: fUresPOneetO. Your March 12, 1979, request for reconsideration, the , Examiner's recommendation of•MarCh6, ' 1979, was reviewed again. It was foun4.that insufficient basis was presented to justify recOnsidering . . and changing the recommendation ." : The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map does in fact indicate that a very ' • small corner of the northwesterly portion of the property might be _ • suitable for commercial uses This was not mentioned in the recommendation due to minor consequence of this inclusion by the very broad and generalized map designation boundaries The corner of commercial was viewed as not actually providing direction to rezone the property to B-1, but to indiCate, withLthe remainder of the generalized commercial area on the map west of . the Site, that should serve as a .buffer between' the' DuvailAVenUe N,E )and Union AvenUell.E. commercial nodes or areas Since the map, as- stated in Conclusion NO. 1 of the recommendation, is a general •guide, - it , was applied in this manner to define, through the rezone process and . . application of the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives,. that Medium Density MUlti-faMily Residential, not Commercial, is the precise land use that should 'occur on the site. . Regarding your statement that the site was at one time used for a service station, the record does not corroborate this information. Although • assumed correct, this information was ". . .reaeonably available. . ." 'at the hearing, and therefore, per Section 4-3015, is not justification for keconsidering' the• recOmmendatiOn. In any case, since the station no longer exists since 1970, its absence (Ides not appear to have bearing uPonthe rezone application. . . . Finally,Ithe .question of the basis for granting a' rezdne is contained in Section 4-3014, which-Vere-re'ad at the beginning of the Examiner's public hearing of:February 27, 1919. I.hope this clarifies the reasons for not reconsidering the recommendation and responds to your claims. Respectfully, t. ick Beeler March 12, 1979 Mr. L. Rick Beeler Land, Use.Hearing Examiner City. of Renton Planning Department City Hall Renton, Washington Re: Request for Reconsideration File No. R-272-79 Dear Mr. Beeler: Pursuant to our meeting of February 27, 1979 and ouvreview.of the findings, we are looking for your reconsideration of the following: A) Ommission of Fact:. 1) The fact was never brought .up, but you can ,see, per the attached comprehensive plan map, part of the property is already designated for B-1 zoning. Applicant's request for B-1 to the opposite corner of the property was to accomplish a more natural and orderly development in this area. 2) This particular section of the property that applicant is requesting B-1 zoning for, was used until 1970 as a gas station site for Gilmore Petroleum Co. B) Misunderstanding of Judgement: 1) It is hard for the applicants to understand that if part of the property is comprehensively zoned B-1 and that there was no public opposition, why couldn't the rezone be accomplished? Sincerely, ren asigt14 Oa,Anton Althoff RECEIVED CRY OF RENTONp,P,%11 HEARING EXAMINER MAR 121979 PM7s8,9,ro,1i,I2:i 1213$4,5t0 6 - 11 r. ....n..-.-, • F-1 : I ;01• -—e)i ' 1 '----1 r , --\ ! - •.-..; .. 7 I 3 e . / ... J 1-.......--s- ... i --5 P ..),.. 1... MAk ... a 171.• r: C•6 ..., P. ":.•••••4,‘ 4, 71rd2 ..„..... . ' 0 7,*I • ‘,.. I 'i 3•• 1 r MPREHENSIVE P °r S,tc, "'"' r..-."- • .IS..1, 4.6.•4 .14ti:t al 74 -....47• 'ilto, , (it 2 l 6L•r I 1- IS% • 44 I• •"` "'lad --7111C-www-von I u COJi n veLATI1 :49 7e .-•7 ' " A h t‘a..P.4 6, 1:•,.AM0CY At llI 8,........, ,,.....T., ..,. .. . 1 gor A% 2G, • a4 .18,y /s4.i.s,:%/SL*9.34:. />47 0411164t... 4t3f. 27 Zb a.• *le 4 a Via.. 4t• 1:••-•••--•••• 85 f litij Lti.a.!,.•sl.-si s i e. 11,:e.,,,:r.,:e,:... Ipy::::c.-xfP.....::::::::-:E.A.144. - :ilv 14----- sT i:;/:::1::!.:;i: IEE:i:lk•5.3:':*;:,.s. S . IQ?•.• p . I p." 4,..iligS•:;':;E:::::::: ::: : 1 r- i .' .- .4: '•L. :+. .S..___G-7 ei, ;9:so •i?sZ 1.i alidti IS•16Itlis 8 5 : 4) 3 6 •Lj 1 ' S%,:::• :::;•::1,..*:*;":4:•7',;<:).1. Io...c::::•.•:.:••:•:::;::::,••x'....,::...:' 1 1 k*:•::::4::•••••••••••••• ••:"•:•:•.57,y..-• 0:,.. • .:.....:•••:•:.,,,.„4,.. ... i.......,,,...---- s•I • 1.:.....<:::.:4•,...:::::•.•::::,,•:•;;:::+•}•:•:•:•,•.0•:.:•:;:i;::::•.:0;.„3:,•••.,:!,$4. . 7--... •NsIi;:•",•?..:iS::?":E:•:::•"-::i::::*3::32.:3:%:i:*i::::: VI::::::A::::::::f.:;:;:.% -1,.••••::•:- -V 0......••°. z,,..:•:•••••,x.•.•:•.•;.,::::0,••:.1:::•:•:•• •••:•.-.•:4•••.:.•:•,..,•). ..,•••• c--c:••:::%1::•.-•,••%:••*::•:•••:,:•:••:,•"•:•:•'::- •••:••••••':::-..,es,i•••:•"•:•••_.• -6. 1 ...,.....e:.::40::::::::::::::.:.:.:.: ..:. 76::*::?:.:::EN:::::::::.:..::.::::::::.%Z.1',: ::::.:.:" V, I.::<;: e.:,?.%:',3,:",1%.C.O I x.x.::::::::.:.:.:.:4:::::.:.::.:.:.:•:.::::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::.:.:".3::::::.:.5:.::::::::::• :.: .:. :;:::3::5;::•:::::::.::::::::::•:•::::::•:•::::‘":::•::::%.*•`:; ::.:::::::?::::*::=:::•:•:::::::Xl.- i.::::::::.:1:1::::11i1:1::::::::::::::::::1:::::.1.:::11:::::::::::::::::::::;::;:":::::.::::::"3":;:;::::::::::::.::::::.::::::;:;::. ::':::::::::.: '.:.;i:.:;:::";P::.::.;::':.*:::::.:.:'..‘i:.::.:;:i:7:::.::.:''.....:: ......:4:%:.:):°;.:::1:;;I::3::).>:.:;':.:•:1.:1):.< •• on4.:::.:.:.:.:.:.::.:::.:•;:•:•:....::,:•:•:.,::.,...,..„.„....... •-••••••54."..,--•-•44;:::::::•:•:::•::::::::::!:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::::•:•:-:•:•:•:::•::•:•:•:•:•:•:::::•*:•••;:•:•:•:•:•:•: 0:•::•:•: :. '00•*: :•%-:"X•:-.4:•••:::''':•:•:•••:'•-:':'t*•••-•1•:•:••::(':•:•:•*:*:':•:•::::1•-•':':.,:.:t:;•:%':,•:*'::•:'.x.:.:.:.:.:......x.:.:.:.:.:.:......x.x.x.x..x.x.x.....,,x4x.x.x.::.:.:.:.:. .: :::•:.:. .::::::•:•:•:::::;::,:::•:•:•::3:**:•::::•:•4•*:-•••:•••::':::•:%%:::::::%.•:::4••••'"...,.:•::':x.x.x.::::::.:4.:..x.x.:.::::.:.:.: :. .:::::: :,::.:.::::::•:•:•-•••': :•:•'.•:•::•:::•:•:::::•' •••::::::":"-:::•t••,;•:':•:::.•:*•,-.:•-•-t.i:,;,:i•-:•:.:.:.:.:::.::::::•:•:•:•:•:•:.:.::•:•5::::•:•:•:•:-::::' • •:•:•:•:: :•::":::•:"::::::::P.-•ft::*:"::::::t•.::.•'::.:;:::::::::.t.: tt•••t:.:."-... f,-. ...” C•:•:•:':•:-:•,:•:•:••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: ': :':•:•:': t';':•::::tt'e•••• •..;•••••••••% •;•••••••••••:.t... :-• .. . 1 11:•:•:•;•;•:,•:,•:::•:1 *.: :•:0•*: ':••:••••;;•:'...:•:•••••;••:'••:•:•:•::•:":•:•:•::-••::: t::•::•:*Ifx::::::•: I7:::::.:.•.•••• ..:,.,•••;•:•:•:•:•:•-•:•:*:K:iiEi:.:iii.:i:ti::::•::.:.••••;:i:;:1:;::::::••:::•••::t:: -:••••••4•••::,.. f :: ‘ •:•:.:.IIe:- ..C::;:• i.,i:i:•:i :::::::;.:::::::::::::::::::: !•:•:•'.. / .••::: •••••::!:: :: : :: :: :.:%•:•.: i.f:::,::,::-.•••I I yyje.a.„'ift?A.c,,,,,,k,t3,::::,..,..L:: 6%.:,:.:::?•,:::::::,,,,.;.:::::::....E*K:::?!:::::::::::::: .:..•• •••:: •:• • • :.::::::::::i:::::::::::;':'::::::::::t*:-:•;:::':••••••.;C::•::':::..1V.E,Vg-49.:::•Ei.t::3:%3:::::;::::•i:.1:::::::::::::::':•:::::•::::•:•,..•' ttt•::::*:t.::::::::%%t"." I4:•:-.:!,.*:•:•:;;;:•:,:•:•::::.1%';.X-F:•::••::::::•:::•;*:•:•••-:-:*:•::::::•:-.••••:::%. ••• "!••"%•"" x:P.:...:::::.:.::::*„::::i$,::::,:::•:::::::::::::::•:•:-:•:::•::::::::::::::•:'.••:::••••••:'::•• ••:::::::%...*: •:.:::::::::::::'::':::::::::.::•.:.::::::;..:.::• :%%:.:•: t:•:•.:.:.:: r7. 7/1°:. / 0 in i}:•:AV:XeNf.t:f:::.{:::•i:::::W:*:.::: •::::•••:.••••:::::.:f•*-:::::.*::::%.•... . 1:::K:gi:il ::.:::.:.*:.:**:.:.:......:''''-:....::•:.::;:.:-:•:....:::...: x....:x.•&.:::c":::•.::$::::,<•:•:..,::•:••'. ...c%•:,•:••:•::::::::::::*:':•:-:' •':': .:tttttt' 6•:..,• ; '': ••:... 4. ii vsx•4•::::,.:•,.:,,;,•••.-....i."-7.......:,:‘,0, .*.•,.....s.:.,•......:::::•:•:-:. 0 I M••'':.....k.::::::•:\';:-..;:t....:.•:•::•:.:•:•:•:::•:::::::: •'• . • .••• 4.•:•:•:•:•:-:•:•:•:•:•'::•:::•:•:::,:•'"*:::',X':':':':*:':-:':':*':':':' ' E::••••xe•••••••••••.•.•••%)%,:s:.:-..,,•••:•:.:.:.74;•:.:•:•:.:-:•:•:-••••••••••••••oc.•••:•••:-••••:•:•:-••:.•,:..-..:.:•:•:.:•:.:•:•:.::, s-:-:•:-:•:•:.:•::::••:-:.:•:-*• -- •• :•:•:•:•:.: x:::::' .••wex:••:•:.:.:.:'• II' 5:•:,•:•:•::•:•:•:•:•:•:. 'M:,....'‘i::1: :Ii:•••:*: .:::::;::.1::.%%. c.,...,,,,,N.,..,:,.•. ...,:•.,;;;;.X.1*:.:i*::::::::::::::::::::::." •::: :::::::-:•*::::::::** 11:2 1 • •' 1 lil . • pc•:;;;;;:r::-:.:n;::Rx-x..:.::::0:07:•:rt-o--X007t1W-1-'47$11 i:::!::Z::'7:ki:::'::::.:*:*::**:;::::: :::::•.::+: ** g--- --- --I--/ -- - -- -"- -r ii1 .• I • A I-- ,r-1,:, 7 t—t\I SR 6 iI1.0 '•.:i HIGf4 SCHOOL 1 I 1 0 8 glim1/4 . C a . . • ••?'.•. I . , 4 5 C: 7 e . i 1 i\ , . •-.....-.......—...... _;.___. ..... ...i.._,....%. 4. ..• ....• 00-----7-.---1,_-r st. ----, A "••• u 4 - I I 19 ta. 4.- ..1 . . ). 1.-•;... a. ..,•: IIt • .;p. %._ :•4 o.wr • • : S.es' = 1 I 1 I . ,n 12.. • ., • -, . .. ,. • ,: A •••••• 1 . •••.r... N::.. > • I Bi . A.-.-....' ' 24: •.4 .• 11E.• ,„,, ::: 11.s.r. .;•:. .1.'A, -44 II .. 01 ...*• ill .: a 1r/.....• 22p 4.6. M.--.-- 5' I. .1 ";Lr:75 L . Cl. ' I 1 ' I ..- , • r / . /----7^-1;-::- - , r-.-. —7— ..-......0 ,, -1 ii • "1 6' 1 i • 1 •. : el '. rZ. .. 9 C.. . .0 le I. •tl I Or laJ.... . 4 m lil4i • / •• L lia.1=11_11131 MIN sal EP Ica Asora ma ea so 1=i 1:=-71 If$I SINcii. FAMII-Y LOW Ve N5i1Y MUltl fAisilt,Y W 1,4-'2. i ,„,- eig1-11 ..- MEDIUM PCNSITY Mui.11 eAtilLYty:•:-:•:-...;::. s::: Avr1.119fr- - 0/wV4CRLI Al. P7Tz7i) I OF R- ti THE CITY OF RENTON c.) MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oammo CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 a- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 O P 917-F0 SEP' ' March 21, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-272-78; Anton & Millie Althoff Request for. Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced application, dated March 6, 1979. A request for reconsideration was received by the Examiner on March 12, 1979, and subsequently denied in a letter to the applicant, dated March 13, 1979. On March 19, 1979, an appeal of the Examiner's recommendation was accepted by the City Clerk. Copies of all correspondence are attached for your review prior to placement of the application on the City Council agenda of April 9, 1979. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact our office. Sincerely, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Renton City Council 4/9/79 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS' - Continued Planning and MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, ITEM 9.a. OF AGENDA BE PRESENTED. Development CARRIED. Hearing Examiner decision recommended approval to R-3 Committee Report zone 'concerning-request for rezone of property located on the south- Anton ai MTT ie west corner NE Sunset Boulevardand Anacortes Ave. NE from "G" to • Althoff Rezone B-1 '.," Rezone requested *by Anton' Althoff to permit future commercial R-272-78 us.e,_ of the subject site. Applicant requested reconsideration on 3/12 and Appeal which was denied by the Examiner. The rezone was appealed to the City Council on 3/19/7.9, objecting that designation of his property as buffer strip'was. improper and capricious. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry. presented committee report having considered appeal of Anton 'and Millie Althoff rezone 272-79 and recommended that the City Council modify the decision of the Hearing Examiner to approve B-1 zoning for one acre in the northwestern corner of the site as requested by the applicant and R-3 for remainder of property: affirming , decision :of the Hearing Examiner. Report listed determined ' errors of fact . and law and .that zoning of both properties shall be subject' to the retention of the existing substantial trees and Honey- dew Creek, 'if possible and desirable upon review of specific site development. The report also recommended that the area between the commercial designation at Union and Sunset and Duvall and Sunset be referred to the' Planninq Commission for review and a change in the Comprehensive Plan, if necessary. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER . MATTER TO ,THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.* Discussion ensued. Wall map used for pointing out question area. Councilman Clymer noted appeal by Mr. " Althoff was for. the one acre only. Larry Brown, 11715 NE 145th, Kirkland, Real Estate representative for Mr. Althoff, explained location of property. MOTION CARRIED; Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be recorded; Councilman Shane requested his YES vote recorded; also restaurant under construction. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, 'CONCUR ' IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO REFER AREA AT UNION NE, NE SUNSET AND DUVALL NE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW OrCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED; Councilman Stredicke requested his NO. vote be recorded. West Hill Councilman Perry recalled Council referral of 4/2/79 of streets Streets in the in the area of the 90-Day Moratorium on multiple building to the Moratorium Area Planning and Development Committee. 'Councilwoman Shinpoch left the Chambers and took no part in any discussion or ,action on this matter. • MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE REFER THE MATTER OF STREETS IN THE WEST HILL AREA TO. THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RATHER THAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: PROCTOR, PERRY, CLYMER, SHANE; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE , SECOND SHANE, LAND USE AND ZONING OF THE WEST HILL AREA BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR 'REVIEW. CARRIED. • Councilwoman Shinpoch returned to the Chambers . Traffic Jam Councilman Shane requested parking be eliminated from Park Ave. North Renton .during shift change and peak hours as 3:00 to 5:0(0 p.m. to ease traffic congestion; also include North Renton Streets of 3rd and 4th. Mayor Delaurenti referred the subject to the Public Works Director for referral to the Traffic Engineering Department. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways .and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report recom- Committee Report . mending second. and final readings of the following ordinances (on first reading 4/9/79) : Ordinance #3306 An ordinance was read rezoning property `located at 516 Williams Ave. Hyland Rezone S. from- R-1 to R-3, known as the Hyland Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, R-305-79 SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ: ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ' Ordinance #3307 Councilman' Perry declared possible conflict of interest and left the Deak Rezone Chambers taking no part in any discussion or action of this matter. R-286-79 An ordinance was read rezoning property from R-2 to P-1 located at the west side of Talbot south .of SE 43rd St. , known as the Deak Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Councilman Stredicke explained withdrawal of his objection. ROLL CALL: ALL ,AYES, CARRIED. Councilman Perry returned to Chambers . irCX.,,..• ,. i:, _ —, -,L..,,./-(-1 ,..1_ 77.) _ 7, PLANNING AND .DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 9, 1979 RE: ANTON AND MILLIE, ALTHOFF REZONE "::FILE: .NO.' R•-272-T.9 The Planning and Development Committeefh.as considered :the., appeal of the above mentioneddecisiondatedMarch6, 1979, and recommends-' that `the, `City -Council modify the decisionoftheHearingExaminertoapproveB-1'.zo'ni,ng "for.'one acre in the northwestern corner ofthesiteasrequestedbytheapplicant, and 'in al:l other respects to affirm the decisionoftheHearingExaminer, based upon -the'-following, errors..of fact and. 'law: 1. Finding No. 9 is in error in thatt;he testimony, clearly 'established that significantimprovementsintheareahaveoccurredsincethe' 1977 1-and use analysis, as required by Section 4-3014C. 2. Conclusion No. 1, paragraph 4; is in error, in that, development of the subject site under B-1 zoning is an appropriate expansion -of th.e commercial node at the' intersectionofDuvallAvenueN.E. and N:E. Sunset Blvd: and will produce .consistent, orderly and coordinated development patterns in these undeveloped areas in the best interest ofthecommunity, its overall attractiveness and desirability. ., 3. Conclusion No. 1, paragraph 5, 'is in error in that the multi-family zoning that hasdevelopednorthofthesiteandacross" N.E. Sunset Blvd. should not be carried southerlyandacrossthesitetoconnectwithmulti-family zoning to the south in order to preventincompatibledevelopmentsina, disorderly growth pattern. , 4. Conclusion No. 2, paragraph 2, .is incorrect in that testimony was clear that public or private improvements in• the,area -..have occurred, since the, 1977 land use analysis which have impacted the subject site sufficient to-warrant: reclassification pursuantto• Section 4-3014C. 4 . 5. Conclusion No. 3 is in error as mere -conjecture of the concern =regarding potentialstripcommercialdevelopment. The Committee recommends that the above stated findings of error should be incorporated :into the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated March 6, 1979, and that the recommendationbeamendedtoreadasfollows: Approval of B-1 zoning for- the one acre parcel" in the northeast corner of the subject property; approval of R-3. zoning- for .the remainder ofthesubjectproperty. Zoning of both properties shall be subject to the retention of the existing substant-i•al trees 'and' Honeydew Creek if possible and desirable upon, review -of specific site development. The Planning and Development Committee further -recommends•.that the area between the commercial designation at Union and Sunset and. Duvall and Sunset be referred to thePlanning -Commission for reviewHand a 'change in the Comprehensive Plan, if necessary. Gerge Perry, Chairman i Barbara Shinpoch 1 t1 yr Renton City Council 4/9/79 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS - Continued Planning and MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, ITEM 9.a. OF AGENDA BE PRESENTED. Development CARRIED. Hearing Examiner decision recommended approval to R-3 Committee Report zone concerning request for rezone of property located on the south- Anton and MUTT/ west corner NE Sunset Boulevardand Anacortes Ave. NE from "G" to Althoff Rezone B-1 ." Rezone requested by Anton Althoff to permit future commercial R-272-78 use of the subject site. Applicant requested reconsideration on 3/12 and Appeal which was denied by the Examiner. The rezone was appealed to the City Council on 3/19/79, objecting that designation of his property as buffer strip was improper and capricious. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented committee report having considered appeal of Anton and Millie Althoff rezone 272-79 and recommended that the City Council modify the decision of the Hearing Examiner to approve B-1 zoning for one acre in the northwestern corner of the site as requested by the applicant and R-3 for remainder of property: affirming decision of the Hearing Examiner. Report listed determined errors of fact and law and that zoning of both properties shall be subject to the retention of the existing substantial trees and Honey- dew Creek, if possible and desirable upon review of specific site development. The report also recommended that the area between the commercial designation at Union and Sunset and Duvall and Sunset be referred to the Planning Commission for review and a change in the Comprehensive Plan, if necessary. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.* Discussion ensued. Wall map used for pointing out question area. Councilman Clymer noted appeal by Mr. Althoff was for the one acre only. Larry Brown, 11715 NE 145th, Kirkland, Real Estate representative for Mr. Althoff-, explained location of property. MOTION CARRIED; Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be recorded; Councilman Shane requested his YES vote recorded; also restaurant under construction. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO REFER AREA AT UNION NE, NE SUNSET AND DUVALL NE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED; Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be recorded. West Hill Councilman Perry recalled Council referral of 4/2/79 of streets Streets in the in the area of the 90-Day Moratorium on multiple building to the Moratorium Area Planning and Development Committee. Councilwoman Shinpoch left the Chambers and took no part in any discussion or action on this matter. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE REFER THE MATTER OF STREETS IN THE WEST HILL AREA TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RATHER THAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: PROCTOR, PERRY, CLYMER, SHANE; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, LAND USE AND ZONING OF THE WEST HILL AREA BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch returned to the Chambers. Traffic Jam Councilman Shane requested parking be eliminated from Park Ave. North Renton during shift change and peak hours as 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. to ease traffic congestion; also include North Renton Streets of 3rd and 4th. Mayor Delaurenti referred the subject to the Public Works Director for referral to the Traffic Engineering Department. Street Vacation Councilman Stredicke requested costs of continuing public hearing Costs for street vacation, noting $100 fee for the vacation, inquirying if additional charge required for hearing continuation. Mayor Delaurenti asked Public Works Director and City Clerk to reply. ORDINANCES' AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report recom • Committee Report mending second and final readings of the following ordinances (on first reading 4/9/79) : Ordinance #3306 An ordinance was read rezoning property located at 516 Williams Ave. Hyland Rezone S. from R-1 to R-3, known as the Hyland Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, R-305-79 SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. SO Renton City Council 4/9/79 Page 3 AUDIENCE COMMENT - 'Continued Resolution #2264 MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, THE 90-DAY BUILDING MORATORIUM RESO- Moratorium on LUTION BE READ AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. City Clerk Mead read resolution Multiple Building placing 90 day moratorium for construction, improvement and alteration Northwest Section of any multiple apartment building, condo, commercial and/or industrial of City. facility in the northwest section of the City from Taylor Ave. NW to the West City Limits and Renton Ave. to the North City Limits. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer reported committee recommendation for adoption. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, ADOPT T4E RESOLUTION AS READ.* Discussion ensued and City Attorney Warren noted the City cannot require additional conditions if building meets zoning regula- tions and the declaration filed of non-significant environmental impact. Councilman Clymer explained the moratorium allows time for study and review street access particularly for access by emergency vehicles and problems that may affect public health and safety. City Attorney Warren explained this moratorium does not affect prior application for multiple residential building. *ROLL CALL: 3-AYES; STREDICKE, PROCTOR, CLYMER; 2-NO: PERRY AND SHANE. CARRIED. Resolution adopted. Further discussion ensued and request was made that the record reflect Public Works Director Gonnason's remarks(that Mr. Neglay' s letter was in error)that financial burden' will be born by the developer who will be required to provide minimum of 20 ft. wide roadway with curbs, gutters and sidewalks on all abutting properties with continuation of Lind Ave. to Taylor. Moratorium MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THE ADMINISTRATION DIRECT THE Continued PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO DENY BUILDING PERMIT FOR MULTIPLE CONSTRUC- TION UNTIL AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HAS BEEN FILED. CARRIED. Persons present opposing construction of condominium in West Hill section: Norm Sundquist, 458 Lind Ave. , requested name of builder. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REFER REQUEST TO CITY ADMINISTRA- TION FOR REPLY. CARRIED. Mr. Sundquist-also inquired of street improvements and was advised by Public Works Director that Taylor Ave. NW •.and Taylor P1 . from Renton to Stevens Ave. providing drainage, sidewalk and 45 ft. roadway, is on the 6-Year Street Program but has not been funded and at the present time no improvements funded. Mr. Sundquist alleged any improvements would be for the benefit of proposed condominimums, being advised by Councilman Perry that City regularly repairs streets throughout the various districts. Chester Douglas, fl5 Lind NW; Oliver Torkelsen 306 NW 2nd Pl . ; Patricia Raphael, 408 Seneca NW; Robin Little, 264 Maple NW; Barbara Little, 264 Maple NW, called attention to petition presented at 10/2/78 public hearing concerning street vacation bearing more than 300 signa- tures protesting high density construction and claimed vested rights. Following further discussion, Public Works Director noted original application for Lakeview Towers building permit made 3/10/78 and not accepted until 4/2/79. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. NE, expressed disapproval of discussion Continued at the expense of Staff member, explaining that Staff interprets, executes and enforces the ordinances, but does not zone property. Traffic Dixie Johnson, 11615 142nd SE, complained of traffic problem near Comment Union Ave. NE and NE 4th St. , traffic from new complex near former Autoban turning left into Cemetery Road. Public Works Director Gonnason explained that right-turn-only was planned onto NE 4th. Lease Renewal Versie Vaupel , 221 Wells Ave. N. , asked for Attorney General Opinion Comment or State Auditor opinion concerning lease of property to Chamber of Commerce, alleging subsidy of profit-oriented organization; also asking where are labor or charitable organizations represented? Recess MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. 11 :35 p.m. Council reconvened at 11 :47 p.m. ROLL CALL: All Council Members present as previously shown. OLD BUSINESS Council President Shinpoch noted receipt of letter from Valley General Hospital Hospital requesting certificate justifying expansion. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY,- REFER THE LETTER FROM THE HOSPITAL TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPLY. CARRIED. Renton`:C'i.t Councia ' fr'4 P ae4lfi '7 9 Old Business - .Continued ' z,; : P PCommittee,'of, ,Whole,G,ounci;l.: President Sh•i;n och" resented". Comm ttee..o'f, the Whore ... - - Repo •t` ,;`, report advising,:memo `from,.Mayor Delaurenti:; reported delay n' askitng 'conside`ration of, the ,Building `reorganization plan until Building.' ; budget. 'presentatlon,.'and,.that •C.ounci.iman= Stredicke had requested Reorganization i`of.ormati;o'n•,in•;;advance`:"of: the`';budge:t;:he'ar.ings. (Information) Fire Department, The' Committee, o;f fth`e Whole,,report•:recomm•ended that' the subject of Consolidation & consolidation :of:_,Fivre=',,Departments and:'fire pro-on south of Protection for..the:';City be referred:-to:the Public Safety,.:Committee for recommenda- i: . South. City tion to•,Council:. MOVED BY .PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, REFER' MATTER TO ,THE .BUDGET`COMMI::TTEE.. ' ;,CARRIED.,. -' Spheres' of The.'r.,eport;recommend:ed. that the' subject' of.Spher•es' of Influence Influence be referred>.to:'the..Ways;;and' Means...Committee for the appropriate . resol'ut.i"on.'with th'e >s`ti ulation: that the -northern boundarybe i P adjusted. to ,_i n,corpor.ate the Renton :School District:. . The report ' s"fated "the commi.ttee;;was;assur,ed that.agreement a.t this time .did not constitute "'a financial.'commi•tment:nor`:'.wer.e there. areas :which were not.:.ne,got:i.abl:e' at `a::l'ate`r::da:te: ,''MOVED. BY SHINPOCH, SECOND ON ... ,CARRI'ED: `CLYMER CONCUR..'.IN,RE:COMMENDAT;I i.,',-.,',,::.,:..,-:,,..:,::::,:,,,,:,..!,,i; z-..,,.: Trash` Receptacles :The :report stated :'that' Mayor Delaurenti explained a need for;:65 new; trash;:receptacles. ,wi'th a purchase price o'f. $5,162.23 and' the .:: .,'' committee 'recommended:that the, matter' .be..'referred to the Community,; Services Committee `''.MOVED :;BY CLYMER :,SECOND,.TRIMM, CONCUR IN THE REPORT. CARRIED f ORDINANCES -AND RESOLUTI O.NS 7 r .PT,7',d . aft e:;Cha'`i'rman;C'l µmen resented' re ort e oWays:',and" Means Ways:a`n Means::Comm,_ e y p; p r. 'n ncen ' -.o di af;.the f: l l owi s .Commi'.ttee: Re ort'::._ mendri '' ec``'nd:':and,::f .na:>4.read :n•`s^o . o d: F irlnane, 3308 ,: Z Clin- read n ;4, °7•g:s 9.. f Dalpay` Rezone An 'ordinan'ce vas read changing°zoni'n"g :classificati'on from• G' General ini:t`e in vict'' loctdR,- :4 o:' i`` `I^ 'ct- L= °'for' ro`er a_1 3 ;`78=- - a ,L= ; ht':,.Tndisar 'a 1 1;Q, s":t 1' Y.-.',`::.;,.,, MOVED- BY. TRIMM- 4 oi'`620='SW. al .:known''as:the:-.Da,1 'a Rezone: 0. SECOND='.CLY;MER, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE' AS READ.: ROLL;,;CALL: ALL.,AYES , '; . CARRI;ED:` :,y ,;. y ;::1 r C ::. .at > J J * t{ „' I. Ordinance:#3309 =.'An ordnance was read rezoning property from .G=.1 General to Single: i f 18Br.i' "e< R n Fa '>l . e' i.:§ .r< c ,, a. "h'cated' :in- =the wici.n t o 00erezoam R sidence: D st .,i .t R' o y B• -PERRY SECONDe .a M ED Y: E.R'.306 79 uvall .;"NE' r=`knc,),#,s` ,Ern i. r r. E t'.11 A: e` xce`D c L ALL• 'A sC' '. , T:;:,. F AN E;,`AS;R' A ="RO L"CLMER'''`AD P TM .ORDI`N C E I,; ;'M n ri" 'yt S4TREDS:CKE,:;:V,OTE D .NQ..,',.. ,OTI'ON CARRI:ED`f., J Miry"'F:fi'.. ,. -:irj.t`., f ,! , 4. ':l= i, i•' f:i 3:1;1`;'=l+ire.: F Tr:.di Wane r for .com rom s t 'are: 3 TO An:o'di a ic `a,. Yr" "d==:=t a n•'ferr' i` 1'0'000 1 m f o "'en a."i: n c la I'mSettaent`:.e. ,ti :e r' n ::,,d`` a:: :, ,t;, ..t.o. `rac t.`c m s t o s-.i'' 'L:,on: . .ga d g.. ama'gd',:fin .ex r4 ont. p_ i:4',Ha. c n" fay.or'•'f<= Y'TR:MM =S C ND: `YMER:es-°Me ha ':cal o „H I:n` z,M`ll 8 I E 0 :CLaa.es':M`:;ciian i `al;`' c,:>. 0 E,13;. r'f,10, ADORT''`AS`READ' OLL'`_CAL AL Y'ESr CEPT.:STREDhC°KE CARRIED. ,, 1'5;.. rolti - yam-.,'. J rGY`,' a t• B 1=--Bus • eFirt: R d,'n Atn c. d;;." n:r` ' faro `G`: o" . ss's ea i or'd :nan e'''wa's:'r'e`a. re o n" `ro±er;t'' sk'm:, n n' et;'. v N'-A'l thoff: eio and R°3.`-located:-on'> ' le=sou-threes_ rre r{of<Su s It" r E Y -t Y72'. 78,. Ana e`: E n:;'a s:f.' a '`r M SE;COND PROCTOR, wCONCURf;IN;RECOMMENDATI,ON=OF;THE COMMITTEE' AND" REFER BACKfTO THEWAYS,AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE'WEEK., CARRIED 1.',k( i fdton'.o'arid:ec, i anRi2itterecommenred.`.read nesoluton -#2 67. Ways•,and.Mea`ns`°'Comm d g: P A le Vacation' fo11: i-n resolu io s 'Y g e ribiicha rr'1 t A' a 1`utio :wa's:,,r.''`ad=soft da'te''''`of` T -'7 r uBetweenSW':, 2 h r so n , e ng, 6 P 9 1and twee 1'3C,', rtto :c :n(sid'er petition of Eugene Mi les:for, vacation;' of alCey'" ` VAC';.# 11'=79 loca'ted between4°SW ,1:2th:,;:;and SW ;:13th S reet's;.;'.MO.VED:BY. :CLYMER, I, Y= 0. SECON BY'SSH'INPOCH`' 'ADOPT:;THEiRfSOLUTION:::AS`.READ. :CARRIED..'. - I I yJt h,2.Reso lutaorr .#2268 •A...reso•1`ut on was,.,.read•, ransferri n =$6>3,82rfrom'Con:fi-agency 'Fund':` Fund :Transfer;: .` to='Current:Fund 'or`;'a "eat^of 19T9 'A `s°oc ation of::,Wash.i'n ton'f r,,,. 5 Ym a: 9 r iAWC 'Dues` C ti.es rvi'ce`k.fe 178:.a'ti.on'-:'of 2.9''000 Yz` fe..'(;t.,2 op. 1,978 p u1 a. ): MOV,ED;BY v.CLYMER,f SECOND tSHINPOCH`, .;CONCUR<<IN..°RECOMMENDATION. AND;: ,,,k r ADOPTI,THE RESOLUTION AS READ. See later action MOVED,'.'BY::PERRSY, ,`S,ECOND SHANE., COUNCI,LsRECESS. ;CARRIE'D•. Council ',..,'_,::.:: recessed at='`1:0:35 p'mr ;fand reconvened: at ':0 45`•;p'::m'. ROLL CALL: t : ;1Al`1':Gounc'iJt, Me hers Present. F.,014.owin discuss:ion'.''on res:o,lu.ti. r`, ' 11} Y r CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3 311 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) AND RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) (R-272-78) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property, hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about December 15, 1978, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about January 23, 1979, and the matter having been appealed to the City Council and the Hearing Examiner's Decision modified by the City Council during/ the regular City Council meeting of April 9, 1979, by adoption of the Planning and Development Committee Report dated April 9,1979, which is incorporated herein es if fully set forth, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property' in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated March 6, 1979 as amended by the Council's adoption of the Planning and Development Committee Report dated April 9, 1979; the Plaanning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as atnended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located on the southwest corner of Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Anacortes Avenue N.E. -Althoff property) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY.THE CITY COUNCIL this 23rd day of April, 1979. Delores A. Mead, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 23rd of A ril, 1979. Charles . Delaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form: C Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 27 , 1979 EXHIBIT '"A" ORDINANCE NO. 3311 R-272-78 DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE REZONED R-3: That portion of the S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 3, T 23 N, R5, E. W.M. King County, Washington, described as follows, ' commencing at the' S.W. corner of said section 3; thence S 88° 39' 01" E along the south line of said S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 for. 965.00 feet to the true point o.f beginning; thence" N 0° 59' 25" E - 454-74 feet to the southeasterly margin of STATE HIGHWAY SR 900; thence .N 64° 56' E along said southeasterly margin 220.39 feet; thence N 70° 17' 21" E - 125.85 feet; thence S 1° 12' 00" W parallel with the east line of said S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 and 40.0 feet westerly •of said east line for 598.01 feet to the south line of said S.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4; thence N 88° 39' 01" W along said south line 313.53 feet to the true point of beginning, containing 3.83 acres. LESS THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED AREA, WHICH SHALL BE ZONED B-1: That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, described as follows : Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 3; thence South 88° 39' 01: East along; the South Line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 1278.53 feet; thence North 1° 12' East parallel with the East Line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and 40.0 feet westerly of said East Line for 280.01 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continue North 1° 12' East 318.0 feet to the Southeasterly. Margin of Primary State Highway #2 "Sunset Highway" thence South 70° 17' 21" West ,.along said Southeasterly Margin 125.85 feet; thence South 64° 56' West along said Southeasterly Margin 36. 17 feet; thence South 1° 12' West parallel with said East Line 256.69 feet; thence South 88° 39' 01" East parallel with the South. Line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 150.0 feet to the True point Of beginning containing one acre.: b. ORDINANCE NO. 3311 i 1I ilt21 0 I.1.11, i,i ! S.F• ce.i.ti •57... I ••I • • 4,1 UiLIJAIZw,. • 4..,.-.:,.. 1 .74114-41-: 41:..4 i'•'./4...1 I 44i 1..... I 0 IIMililli • . . •' . i""-it'-' ' 0 lr i ..1 G 1 .- 1.lcrvith I. 9 1 i . 4r------- 1-7-- i .--i7-ib. 1 1 • . 1 . 1 .. F 1 • i a.... t, ....I. .:„....7, eti .„,.. i...... z., , •. • . ,I. , . r-t-\ t, 1 1;:..i.1-..• • -....- pziviiiit. 1/44,,,,-.... • - •• \ i - . I 0 r .:. stis ,41i4IL__p•• •tAlt,R1, ,: riitikt.$1' • 0 . al i . i. •• r 4-4--!..-..ig. iuo..tt 1 • .... 1.../. r . II 44 .• 5:44, • -------.. i V .R-3 Ij: G . ---- L R-2 - 1 4--. 70.• • .. . .• . 18 114 i '•. rco.0.1 L.I . a. meas...uw. F371.2t4 . . . 1 ' 7-7- -7.77...-.7frn...._' F4....-. !Ps 0, 0:: 1 Sql 1. ''.av i I 1i W:,' 'alk± ...;1. 't1,.3'` •il'...."•..".• ' • • 4 - ir' Iv ti- • , ....t ' ..:‘,, ... .,„8,1:.,-....:. •• •• i i 7.e.•4 it.t 441 11 t. . I'- .1^10) • ' "Ili.t‘4 . '. ' ''• L.,N. 6,.4;•C ..,.C.!'l• • 1,7 , • :. .,, , . I_L.':., •.. 1 IL 1 .,.., ..‘:2 ',•'.11‘,..!Irr'''.,h.r:.• 44.......... d ,*.....:,4% ... . . . . ,; , 4-. ,:-.. -.'7,1'1 c.,-...f.,,!4•..... - . . . •i• . r,....1 . .....0,'t, 11 , .. . ... 1 3,.•.•r.•tv. .......i.....,,, a i 1lo s, 1 • 14.\{'I i I . r•:•.4.0 1:1 : i I REZONE:. ANTON ALTHOFF - R-272-78 • APPLICANT . ANTON ALTHOFF. TOTAL AREA ±3.82 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Sunset Blvd. N.E. EXISTING ZONING "G" - General Classification District EXISTING USE ' Single' Family/Undeveloped • PROPOSED USE • Future commercial use of the site.' ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family H COMMENTS- 1 rw OF RA, o THE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 09A to• CITY CLERK 0 SEP1E O April 25 , 1979 Mr. & Mrs. Anton Althoff 9610 Triton Dr. ' Seattle, Wa. 98117 RE : A'\,LTHOFF REZONE R-272-78 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Althoff, The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, April 23 , 1979 has adopted Ordinance No. 3311. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM: db Enclosure i p51 I r Renton City Council 4/23/79 Page 4 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report Committee Report recommending second and final readings of the following Ordinance #3311 Ordinance: (First reading 4/16/79) Althoff Rezone An ordinance was read changing certain zoning classification R-272-28 from General Classification District (G) to Business District B-1) and Residence District (R-3) for property located on the southwest corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Anacortes Ave. NE, known as the Althoff Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES EXCEPT STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3312 An ordinance was read providing for the construction and Fire :Lanes maintenance of fire lanes and prohibiting parking and storage of materials in fire zones. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY TO ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. After readings it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED. Upon inquiry Mayor Delaurenti noted fire prevention could post notices on entrances of businesses regarding penalty of parking in fire lanes. Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following Ordinances for first reading: Specified Hours An ordinance was read repealing ordinance relating to specified of Sale-Auctions hours of sale - Auctions. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH TO REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Appropriation of An ordinance was read providing for appropriation of funds, Funds for for the purpose of employing temporary personnel , in the amount Temporary of $11,525.00. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH TO REFER BACK Personnel TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. (Public Works Personnel ) Appropriation of An ordinance was read providing for appropriation of funds, Funds-Payment of for payment of fire fighters comp time, in the amount of Fire Fighters Comp $33,940.00. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND PROCTOR TO REFER BACK Time TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following. Resolutions for adoption: Resolution #2269 Resolution was read adopting establishment of Spheres of Influence Spheres of for long range planning as to future annexations or extension of Influence city services between the cities of Renton, Bellevue, and Issaquah. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2270 Resolution was read transferring funds for airport paving and Transfer of Funds curbing for the road system around the Airport in the amount of Airport Paving & $3,339.07. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE TO ADOPT THE_ RESOLUTION.. Curbing of Road AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2271 Resolution was read approving Interlocal Planning Agreement for LEAA Funding 1980 and execution of documents to benefit the general public and assist in the reduction of crime and increase the effectiveness of the local law enforcement system - LEAA Grant. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distrubuted to all Council Members and adopted by one motion without separate discussion. (Adopting motion to follow agenda items. ) MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH TO REMOVE ITEM:REGARDING GENE E. FARRELL (Weatheredwood #2) PRELIMINARY PLAT PP-315-79 FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Renton City Council 4/23/79 Page 3 Old Business - Continued Completion of Ways and Means Committee report recommended the matter of Basement-Classroom/ completion of basement-classroom/meeting room, evidence room, Meeting Room, and restrooms in the New Main Fire Station amounting to Evidence Room &20,000.00 be referred back to the Public Safety Committee Restrooms in New for review and recommendation. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE Main Fire Station TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION. CARRRIED. Voucher Approval Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for payment of Vouchers No. 22854 through No. 23053 (Machine Voids #22849- 22853) in the amount of $271,714.01 having received departmental approval as to receipt of merchandise and/or services. Included LID 297 Warrants: Revenue R-15 for $293.17 and Cash C-18 for 293. 17; and LID 302 Warrants: Revenue R-34 for $111,905.59, Cash C-78 for $8,625.17, Cash C-79 for $97,428.41, and Cash C-80 , for $4,852.01. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM TO APPROVE VOUCHERS AS DRAFTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Trimm presented report Committee Report recommending concurrence in the expenditure of the City's 20% Extension of portion of extension of paving on the east side to line up the Paving-Taxiways taxiways, which now end in gravel , be added to FAA/ADAP Project at Airport, 5-53-005-03. Cost estimated between $40,000 and $50,000. Addition to FAA/ MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHINPOCH TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE ADAP Project RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. No Parking" Transportation Committee report recommended the posting of Signs on Perimeter permanent "No Parking" signs along perimeter road due to Road continued problem of Sunbird employees parking on the perimeter road. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Funding for Transportation Committee report recommended funds in the Extension to amount of $3,339.07 be transferred from Capital Outlay Account Perimeter Road for extension of the Perimeter Road to the Sunbird Restaurant site and refer to the Ways and Means Committee for resolution. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. (See later. adoption of Resolution #2270) Senior Citizen City Clerk Mead read memo from Ted Bennett, Deputy Finance Director, Income Requirements to Councilman Shane regarding Senior Citizen Income Requirements for Special Utility for special utility rates and how the City of Renton ($4y800 per Rates annum for a single person; and $7,200 per annum for a married couple) compares with the City of Seattle (single-$6,678 and married-$8,736) . MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM TO REFER ORDINANCE REGARDING SENIOR CITIZEN INCOME REQUIREMENTS FOR SPECIAL UTILITY RATES TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMTTTFF FOR REVIEW. CARRIED. Request for MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER MATTER OF REQUIRING No More than NOT MORE THAN A 15% GRADE ON ALL FUTURE ROAD CONSTRUCTION TO 15% Road Grade THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND REPORT BACK. CARRIED. Taxing of Gambling City Clerk Mead read letter from Lawrence J. Warren, City by Non-Profit or Attorney, 'to Councilman Shane regarding the municipal powers Charitable regarding taxing of gambling by non-profit or charitable Organizations organizations. Moved by Shane, Second Trimm to refer the matter to the Public Safety Committee. Roll Call : 2-Aye: Trimm, Shane; 5-No: Shinpoch, Stredicke, Proctor, Perry, Clymer. Motion failed. i Ztf OF,iRENTON FROM,-' Affidavit of Publication*TR11CT,(B-j),-ANbALsP- thence North L-1!12' 'East said Southwest.(ju4rter.,,qf STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. egu-., . -feet steely. of of the -jPenc0=6thiue Ndfth,142: oath,deposes and says that of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) A2585 feet, thence'.Sot.All times a week.That said newspaper is has in 161'114beenformorethansixmonths le Record-Chronicle has been approved...legal newspaper by order of the thence N 0°59'25"E-454- 74 feet to-the southeasterly_ margin of,::STATE:`HIGH-'; WAY.'SR; -900, .thence' N;+ 64°56''E.along-said'south easterly margin 220.39.feet; thence N"70°1T21":E: 1-25:85 feet; thence 1°12'OQ'W parallel with the e0st-line'of said a{is.SA. 1:and.,40.0 feet esterly:of said east line for:! 598.01:feet to the south line` t of said S.W.'/4,of the,S;W: 1/4;,thence:-N.88°39'01 W along said"south line:313;53`feet:to'to, the Vile, point of beginning;,containing:3.83 awes.. : I LESS..THE FOLLOWING': DESCRIBED AREA WHICH SHALL BE ZONEDi That• rtion of the South CITY OF,RENTON - Po--.., WASHINGTON;vvest-'Quarter.of.the_South- 4 ORDINANCE.;NO.331;1 - west Quarter_.of Section_.3, AN.ORDINANCE O F, Township'23 North,Range 6' THE CITY OF RENTON,- ::East, W.M:;;.Ong.County, W A S H•1 N G T O N'„ Washington;-described as? CHANGING THE.ZON follows:: . ING CLASSIFICATION . Commencing, at "the:' I OF CERTAIN PROPER‘., Southwest comer,of said 1 l p C CE DME MMR 19. I979 March 19, 1979 - CITY CLERK Members of the City Council City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Reconsideration Appeal for Rezone File No. R-272-79 Dear Honorable Council Members: The purpose of this letter is to appeal the Hearing Examinier's decision relative to the above mentioned rezone application. I believe firmly, as a taxpayer in the City of Renton for over twelve years, that having only my property designated as a so called "buffer" strip is improper and very capricious. I hope that a review of my application file will result in a mod- ification of the decision. Thank you for your consideration. . Sincerely, Z-t'A. Anton Althoff AA/11 I OF v . 0 s THE ' CITY OF RENTON Q 7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055, 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD CITY CLERK O dP D4T- SEPIC-‘4" March 21, 1979 CERTIFICATE, OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss: COUNTY OF KING DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and' a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 21st day of March, 1979, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly -mailed-and placed in. the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by First Class Mail , a true and correct NOTICE OF. APPEAL FILED BY ANTON ALTHOFF REGARDING. REZONE FILE NO. R-272-78. a. Delores A. Mead, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME this 21st day. of March, 1979. Notary Public, in and _for the%State of Washington, residing in Renton . st RENTON tkr,..., „._.,,,TY '-:OF d 2"-- . . NAN. -.E ., DEPARTMENT 7)1,41',) -/ i 19 0 'a4 5 2 7 .j, _RENTON, WASHINGTON 9 80 5 5 . '' ' RECEIVED OF 41---(....1 --• - II •,= a6,....,. (,) ci 6 -/P 4-6(( )-- ei,/,61-_,. e-,:,.i ..:2, 4-,-; 1- --". 4r:- h' . 1.:. TOTAL t 1 GWEN E-CTORDIMARSH 1 BY FINANC 2.'•'; •0,.• ..- '' ''..:;J.'1:'''.''. .-:-..''''.•.';''..--.,' .: '' • '- . : : ' ' ' : . ' 2,Z:- •":"' -', ;-:- . • - :-•.• .-:.'-.',:....,: i•-••• •••::,.....•.,.,.-•, ',. .; ‘. . : 1. N.,-,1,_ - . _ , , . . . 1.,' ...'' .' 1, ., . . , ..._ . .. , .. , ', . ' S-'. ..,', . , ,, ., 1,,,1,..'',, .• . , , 1 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 13 CITY CLERK FO SEPS° O March 21, 1979 APPEAL FILED BY: Anton Althoff RE: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's Decision dated March 6, 1979 Anton Althoff Rezone, File No. R-272-78 To Parties of Record: Appeal of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk's Office on March 19, 1979, along with the proper fee of 25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code, as amended. The City Code requries the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council 's Planning & Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary, 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meeting is so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton .City Council at its regular meeting of April 9, 1979 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South, Renton. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON ade-to 9 V Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st i/. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON FEBRUARY 27 1979 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . ANTON A . AND MILLIE E . ALTHOFF, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING OF APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B- 1 , File R-272-78 ; property located on Sunset Blvd . between Anacortes Ave . N . E . and approximately 360 feet to the west . 2 . GARY L . AND BARBARA J . GARNER , APPLICATIONS FOR TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL , File 302-79 , EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RE . PIPESTEM LOTS , File E-303-79 , AND WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File W-304-79; property located in the vicinity of 3405 Talbot Road South . 3'. DEAN W . BITNEY , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO T AND SR- 1 , File R-256-78 ; property located in the vicinity of 201 Union Ave . S . E . 4 . DEAN W. BITNEY , LEISURE ESTATES MOBILE HOME PARK , SOUTH ANNEX , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 61-LOT ADDITION TO EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK, File PMH-301-79; property located in the vicinity of 201 Union Ave . S . E . Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 27 , 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED February 16 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR OF R4, 0 o CITY OF RENTON dry ICKRk ./141 G 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CH •L .*AIREAVNTI, OR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 O•L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 gTFO SEP1 - g'0 C) 1$z March 13, 1979 Mr. Anton Althoff QQ' 9610 Triton Drive q IN G - Seattle, WA 98117 RE: File No. R-272-78; Anton & Millie Althoff Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Althoff: In response to your March 12, 1979, request for reconsideration, the Examiner's recommendation of March 6, 1979, was reviewed again. It was found that insufficient basis was presented to justify reconsidering and changing the recommendation. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map does in fact indicate that a very small corner of the northwesterly portion of the property might be suitable for commercial uses. This was not mentioned in the recommendation due to minor consequence of this inclusion by the very broad and generalized map designation boundaries. The corner of commercial was viewed as not actually providing direction to rezone the property to B-1, but to indicate, with the remainder of the generalized commercial area on the map west of the site, that the site should serve as a buffer between the Duvall Avenue N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. commercial nodes or areas. Since the map, as stated in Conclusion No. 1 of the recommendation, is a general guide, it was applied in this manner to define, through the rezone process and application of the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives, that Medium Density Multi-family Residential, not Commercial, is the precise land use that should occur on the site. Regarding your statement that the site was at one time used for a service station, the record does not corroborate this information. Although assumed correct, this information was ". . .reasonably available. . ." at the hearing, and therefore, per Section 4-3015, is not justification for reconsidering the recommendation. In any case, since the station no longer exists since 1970, its absence does not appear to have bearing upon the rezone application. Finally, the question of the basis for granting a rezone is contained in Section 4-3014, which were read at the beginning of the Examiner's public hearing of February 27, 1979. I hope this clarifies the reasons for not reconsidering the recommendation and responds to your claims. Respectfully, L. ick Beeler March 12, 1979 Mr. L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Planning Department City Hall Renton, Washington Re: Request for Reconsideration File No. R-272-79 Dear Mr. Beeler: Pursuant to our meeting of February 27, 1979 and our review of the findings, we are looking for your reconsideration of the following: A) Ommission of Fact: 1) The fact was never brought up, but you can see, per the attached comprehensive plan map, part of the property is already designated for B-1 zoning. Applicant's request for B-1 to the opposite corner of the property was to accomplish a more natural and orderly development in this area. 2) This particular section of the property that applicant is requesting B-1 zoning for, was used until 1970 as a gas station site for Gilmore Petroleum Co. B) Misunderstanding of Judgement: 1) It is hard for the applicants to understand that if part of the property is comprehensively zoned B-1 and that there was no public opposition, why couldn't the rezone be accomplished? Sincerely, 10•4;,, atm# Anton Althoff RECEIVED CITY OF RENTONAA/11 HEARING EXAMINER MAR 1 21979 PM 1819110,1111211 '2131415,0 r,': arc . ? I i 8 r1 A p or}'9Zr 7j7 4 yjI % 3 1t•--•-- .. - _.n r. girl, p •CO11PkEHEriS 1 YE ima. ... • i 4,. 7(.. ' a Avert)? viqOE' Ei 5 :c9 i ` 27 2pQ V 4 • x:::::::::Ac„..::••,<::0).,,,.. , lit6/77 S C. 7 8'''IG' I!1 !i r fi{•r':''r•;;tir ?2 ;i a j l6 t6l i l l g S 4 1 3 1 r,: r::• 'rf::: i)-`/%. I 7'{rr•.Sr:}:ti^G:i Yyr_ /:'l.:rF/•Y r':j ..fti•:•: I`•-• s r{tir f rrv:?t,.;:"...•J :::::Fi: .}v' r:vii: :':S: i. .*:.-::44.yr• i:•.YJ r _f r• r: :;:;::.?{• ice :f rs4.4 F• f r f {:Y 4' r•r: p4r•'• J r r Y I t.ti' r' Yr.v h•r'f• tiI' 4 0 ti rJ:•1 f f ti:.IV e r•,/ t 1.:•:Y.Y• r }• '.Yf 4 .4' 411 xei;:;M:•:::::i:i:::;:i.:::::..?i::.iif:::::;6:i..?.:.:::Z:iiiii:::::;•:::::.i... .“...• . ::::::***.Z ::':.. . . ,:'::":.. .::.... i.::.' g . I R:s:X::::.'n$:Y: :+:5. ;:;'y •.• ••• ll. rtii''— rV;{;?•iiti• ;A{:I ti::.'a.••N:!MY:::1•:.:;, •• r- ix:=:: •• y -- - -- - a i, -i.IG:r4 SC./ 11-00i 1f. V - y S..'G ` 'u 9 ;IQ. I' i - • u i i • as C s1NG1l4 FAMILY plml:.c i ras m up.Ioo Nam mem 1 ci-i a) 1 . L•OW 'PCNS 11Y ML U.11 (Milo, 1M L=--:, ' - gaga—mec um Poor Y Muvri FAMILY • y GOM/KCRLIAI 27G'7 ,. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. COMMITTEE' REPORT APRIL .9, 1979 RE: ANTON AND MILLIE ALTHOFF REZONE - FI.LE. NO. R-272-79 The Planning and Development' Commi;ttee :h'as':consid.ered the appeal of the above mentioned decision dated March 6,,,1+979, a,nd 'r.ecommends_. that the City Council modify the decision ' of the Hearing :Examiner '-to approve. B=1 zoning ,for one acre in the northwestern corner of the site as requested;by the applica'nt,•__and' in al;l other respects .to affirm the decision of the'Heari;ng Examiner;: based, upon; .the: ,foll'owing: errors of fact and law: , 1.• Finding No: 9 is' in.error` in that the :t:estimony clearly established that significant improvements in the 'area haveoccurred s,ince ;the_ 1977 land use analysis, as required by Section 4-3014C. 2.. Conclusion No,. 1, paragraph 4, ;is-in°.'error,',.'in that development of the subject site under B-1 zoning is an:'appropri'ate expansion,'of the commercial node at the intersection of Duvall Avenue .N.E:, and .N..E:; Sunset: Bl vd;. and, will produce consistent, orderly and coordinated development ,patterns in theseundeveloped areas in the best interest of the community,:_its .overal.l: attractiveness .and desirability. 3. Conclusion No. ,1, ' paragraph,:5,, is -i n, error in' .that the multi-family zoning that has developed north of the .site and, across ,N.E. Sunset Blvd. should not be .carried southerly and across the site to: connect with multi-family zoning to the south in' order to prevent incompatible developments in a disorderly growth pattern. 4. Conclusion 'No. . 2,, ,paragraph ,2, is incorrect in that testimony was clear that public or private improv.ements ,'in .the area have occurred since the 1977 land use analysis which have impacted _the .subject •site sufficient to warrant reclassification pursuant to Section 4-3014C. • 5. Conclusion No. 3. is. in error as mere conjecture of the concern regarding potential strip commercial development. The Committee, recommends that the above-stated findings of error should .be incorporated into the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated March 6, 1979, and that the recommendation . be. amended to read as 'follows.: Approval, of B-1 zoning for the one acre :parcel. in the northeast corner of the subject property;: approval of R-3 zoning for the remainder of the subject property. , . Zoning of• both- properties sha=ll .be subject to the retention of the existing substantial trees and Honeydew Creek if possible and desirable upon review of specific .site development. The Planning and Development, Committee further recommends that the area between the commercial designation 'at,.Un:ion and Sunset and Duvall and Sunset be referred to thecommercial Planning Commission for review and a change in the .Comprehensive Plan, if necessary. - sue-jL,.r 7 A- --c . 4' C-t c9. cQ n..o_.- --(teacC:`. Ge ge- Perry,' Chairman ' ,rfr Barbara Shin•poch . j Earl Clymer , . t "` Renton City Council 4/9/79 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS - Continued Planning and MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, ITEM 9.a. OF .AGENDA BE PRESENTED. Development CARRIED.' Hearing Examiner decision recommended approval to R-3 Committee Report zone concerning request for rezone of property located on the south- Anton and-Wife- west corner NE Sunset Boulevardand Anacortes Ave.' NE from "G" to Althoff Rezone B-1:" . Rezone requested by Anton Althoff to permit future commercial R-272-78 use of the subject site. Applicant" requested reconsideration on 3/12 and Appeal which was denied by the Examiner. The rezone was appealed to the City Council on 3/19/79, objecting that designation of his property as buffer strip was improper and capricious. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented committee report having considered appeal of Anton and Millie Althoff rezone 272-79 and recommended that the City Council modify the decision of the Hearing Examiner to approve B-1 zoning for one acre in the northwestern corner of the site as requested by the applicant.and,_R-3 .for remainder of property; affirming decision of the Hearing Examiner. Report listed determined , ._ errors of fact and law and that zoning of both' properties shall be subject to the retention of the existing substantial trees and Honey- dew Creek, If possible and desirable upon review of specific site development. The report also recommended that the area between the commercial designation at Union and Sunset and Duvall, and Sunset be referred to the. Planninq Commission .for review and a change in the Comprehensive Plan, if necessary. MOVED BY PERRYy SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.* Discussion ensued. Wall map used 'for pointing out question _area. . Councilman Clymer noted appeal by Mr. Althoff was for the one acre only. Larry Brown, 11715 NE 145th,' Kirkland, Real Estate representative for Mr. Althoff, explained location of property. MOTION CARRIED; Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be recorded; Councilman Shane requested his YES • vote recorded; CONCU R IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO REFER AREA AT UNION NE, NE SUNSET AND DUVALL NE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW OF 'COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED; Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be, recorded. West Hill Councilman Perry recalled- Council referral of 4/2/79 of streets Streets in the in the area of the 90-,Day Moratorium on multiple building to the Moratorium Area Planning and Development Committee,.' Councilwoman Shinpoch left the Chambers and took- no part in any discussion or action on this matter. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE REFER THE MATTER Of. STREETS IN THE WEST HILL AREA TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE' RATHER THAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE: ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: PROCTOR, PERRY, CLYMER, SHANE; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, LAND USE AND ZONING OF THE WEST HILL AREA .BE .REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR'REVIEW. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch returned to the Chambers. Traffic Jam Councilman Shane requested parking be eliminated' from Park_ Ave. .. North Renton _. „ .during shift change and, peak hours as3:00to...5,:-00 p.m. to ease traffic congestion; also include North Renton Streets of 3rd and 4th. Mayor Delaurenti referred the subject to" the' Public Works Director for referral to" the Traffic Engineering Department. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report recom- Committee Report mending second and final readings of the following ordinances (on first reading 4/9/79) :. Ordinance #3306 An ordinance was read rezoning property located at 516 Williams Ave. Hyland Rezone S. from R-1 to R-3, known as the Hyland Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, R-305-79 SECOND PERRY;, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ, ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3307 Councilman. Perry declared possible conflict •of 'interest and left the Deak Rezone Chambers taking no part in any discussion or .action of this matter. ' R-286-79 An ordinance was read rezoning property from R-2 to P-1 located at the west side of- Talbot Rd. south of SE. 4-3rd, St.', 'known as the Deak Rezone. , MOVED BY CLYMER; SECOND. PERRY, 'ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Counctiman Stredicke .explained withdrawal of his objection. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES'. CARRIED. Councilman Perry returned to Chambers. G Cx lei PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 9, 1979 RE:- ANTON AND MILLIE ALTHOFF REZONE -- .FILL NO. R-272-79 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the above mentioned decision dated March 6, 1979, and recommends that the City Council modify the decision of the Hearing Examiner to approve B-1 zoning for one acre in the northwestern corner of the site as requested by the applicant, and in all; Other respects to affirm the decision of the Hearing Examiner, based Upon the following errors of fact and law: 1. Finding No. 9 is in error in that the testimony clearly established that significant improvements in the area have occurred, since the 1977 land use analysis, as required by Section 4-3014C. 2. Conclusion No. 1, paragraph 4; is in error, in that development of the subject site , under B-1 zoning is an appropriate expansion of the commercial node at the intersection of Duvall Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Blvd. and will produce consistent, orderly. and coordinated development patterns in these undeveloped areas in the best interest of the community, its overall attractiveness and ,desirability. . 3. Conclusion No. 1, paragraph 5, is in error in ,that the multi-family zoning that has developed north of the site and across N.E. Sunset,Blvd. should not be carried southerly and across the site to connect.with multi-family z.oning. to the .south in order to prevent incompatible developments' in a disorderly. growth pattern. 4. Conclusion No. 2, paragraph 2, is incorrect in that ,testimony was clear that public or private improvements in the area have occurred since then1977 land use analysis which have impacted the subject site sufficient to .warrant reclassification pursuant to Section 4-3014C. 5. Conclusion No. ' 3 is in error as mere conjecture of:,the. coneern regarding potential strip commercial development. The Committee recommends that the above stated findings of error should be incorporated into the decision of the Hearing .Examiner dated March 6, 1979, and that the recommendation' be amended to read as follows: Approval of B-1 zoning for the one acre parcel. in the -northeast. corner of the subject property; .approval of R-3 zoning. for. the remainder of the subject property. Zoning of both properties, sha.11 ..be subject to the retention of the existing substantial trees and Honeydew Creek if possible and desirable upon review of,.specific:.site development. . The Planning and Development Committee .further recommends.•that'.the -area between the • commercial designation at .Union and Sunset and 'Duvall;and Sunset be referred to the Planning Commission for reviewand a change in 'the,:Coriprehensive Plan, if necessary. l b fib GeOige Perry, Chairman c,Barbara,,.Shi,npoch . _., , ,,, . w- t . `, i Renton City Council 4/9/79 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS - Continued Planning and MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, ITEM 9.a. OF AGENDA BE PRESENTED. Development CARRIED. Hearing Examiner decision recommended approval to R-3 Committee Report zone concerning request for rezone of property located on the south- Anton and Mil ie west corner NE Sunset Boulevardand Anacortes Ave. NE from "G" to Althoff Rezone B-1 . " Rezone requested by Anton Althoff to permit future commercial R-272-78 use of the subject site. Applicant requested reconsideration on 3/12 and Appeal which was denied by the Examiner. The rezone was appealed to the City Council on 3/19/79, objecting that designation of his property as buffer strip was improper and capricious. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented committee report having considered appeal of Anton and Millie Althoff rezone 272-79 and recommended that the City Council modify the decision of the Hearing Examiner to approve B-1 zoning for one acre in the northwestern corner of the site as requested by the applicant and R-3 for remainder of property: affirming decision of the Hearing Examiner. Report listed determined errors of fact and law and that zoning of both properties shall be subject to the retention of the existing substantial trees and Honey- dew Creek, if possible and desirable upon review of specific site development. The report also recommended that the area between the commercial designation at Union and Sunset and Duvall and Sunset be referred to the Planning Commission for review and a change in the Comprehensive Plan, if necessary. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.* Discussion. ensued. Wall map used for pointing out question area. Councilman Clymer noted appeal by Mr. Althoff was for the one acre only. Larry Brown, 11715 NE 145th, Kirkland, Real Estate representative for Mr. Althoff., explained location of property. MOTION CARRIED; Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be recorded; Councilman Shane requested his YES vote recorded; also restaurant under construction. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO REFER AREA AT UNION NE, NE SUNSET AND DUVALL NE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED; Councilman Stredicke requested his NO vote be recorded. West Hill Councilman Perry recalled Council referral of 4/2/79 of streets Streets in the in the area of the 90-Day Moratorium on multiple building to the Moratorium Area Planning and Development Committee. Councilwoman Shinpoch left the Chambers and took no part in any discussion or action on this matter. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE REFER THE MATTER OF STREETS IN THE WEST HILL AREA TO THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE RATHER THAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: PROCTOR, PERRY, CLYMER, SHANE; ONE NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, LAND USE AND ZONING OF THE WEST HILL AREA BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REVIEW. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch returned to the Chambers. Traffic Jam Councilman Shane requested parking be eliminated from ,Park Ave. North Renton during shift change and peak hours as 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. to ease traffic congestion; also include North Renton Streets of 3rd and 4th. Mayor Delaurenti referred the subject to the Public Works Director for referral to the Traffic Engineering Department. Street Vacation Councilman Stredicke requested costs of continuing public hearing Costs for street vacation, noting $100 fee for the vacation, inquirying if additional charge required for hearing continuation. Mayor Delaurenti asked Public Works Director and City Clerk to reply. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report recom- Committee Report mending second and final readings of the following ordinances (on first reading 4/9/79) : Ordinance #3306 An ordinance was read rezoning property located at 516 Williams Ave. Hyland Rezone S. from R-1 to R-3, known as the Hyland Rezone. MOVED BY CLYMER, R-305-79 SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. L, Renton City Council 4/9/79 Page 3 AUDIENCE COMMENT - Continued Resolution #2264 MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, THE 90-DAY BUILDING MORATORIUM RESO- Moratorium on LUTION BE READ AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. City Clerk Mead read resolution Multiple Building placing 90 day moratorium for construction, improvement and alteration Northwest Section of any multiple apartment building, condo, commercial and/or industrial of City. facility in the northwest section of the City from Taylor Ave. NW to the West City Limits and Renton Ave. to the North City Limits. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer reported committee recommendation for adoption. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.* Discussion ensued and City Attorney Warren noted the City cannot require additional conditions if building meets zoning regula- tions and the declaration filed of non-significant environmental impact. Councilman Clymer explained the moratorium allows time for study and review street access particularly for access by emergency vehicles and problems that may affect public health and safety. City Attorney Warren explained this moratorium does not affect prior application for multiple residential building. *ROLL CALL: 3-AYES; STREDICKE, PROCTOR, CLYMER; 2-NO: PERRY AND SHANE. CARRIED. Resolution adopted. Further discussion ensued and request was made that the record reflect Public Works Director Gonnason's remarks(that Mr. Neglay' s letter was in error)that financial burden' will be born by the developer who will be required to provide minimum of 20 ft. wide roadway with curbs, gutters and sidewalks on all abutting properties with continuation of Lind Ave. to Taylor. Moratorium MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THE ADMINISTRATION DIRECT THE Continued PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO DENY BUILDING PERMIT FOR MULTIPLE CONSTRUC- TION UNTIL AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HAS BEEN FILED. CARRIED. Persons present opposing construction of condominium in West Hill section: Norm Sundquist, 458 Lind Ave. , requested name of builder. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REFER REQUEST TO CITY ADMINISTRA- TION FOR REPLY. CARRIED. Mr. Sundquist-also inquired of street improvements and was advised by Public Works Director that Taylor Ave. NW .and Taylor P1 . from Renton to Stevens Ave. providing drainage, sidewalk and 45 ft. roadways -is on the 6-Year Street Program but has not been funded and at the present time no improvements funded. Mr. Sundquist alleged any improvements would be for the benefit of proposed condominimums, being advised by Councilman-Perry that City regularly repairs streets throughout the various districts. Chester Douglas, 615 Lind NW; Oliver Torkelsen 306 NW 2nd P1 . ; Patricia Raphael, 408 Seneca NW; Robin Little, 264 Maple NW; Barbara Little, 264 Maple NW, called attention to petition presented at 10/2/78 public hearing concerning street vacation bearing more than 300 signa- tures protesting high density construction and claimed vested rights. Following further discussion, Public Works Director noted original application for Lakeview Towers building permit made 3/10/78 and not accepted until 4/2/79. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. NE, expressed disapproval of discussion Continued at the expense of Staff member, explaining that Staff interprets, executes and enforces the ordinances, but does not zone property. Traffic Dixie Johnson, 11615 142nd SE, complained of traffic problem near Comment Union Ave. NE and NE 4th St. , traffic from new complex near former Autoban turning left into Cemetery Road. Public Works Director Gonnason explained that right-turn-only was planned onto NE 4th. Lease Renewal Versie Vaupel , 221 Wells Ave. N. , asked for Attorney General Opinion Comment or State Auditor opinion concerning lease of property to Chamber of Commerce, alleging subsidy of profit-oriented organization; also asking where are labor or charitable organizations represented? Recess MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. 11 :35 p.m. Council reconvened at 11 :47 p.m. ROLL CALL: All Council Members present as previously shown. OLD BUSINESS Council President Shinpoch noted receipt of letter from Valley General Hospital Hospital requesting certificate justifying expansion. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY, REFER THE LETTER FROM THE HOSPITAL TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPLY. CARRIED.