No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-323T:'="•••4"7 ":•',----'-;-."-47-.---*-.9--_--"-;-_-•`-"t-,-,--:;?_-:•:=7-;-_`-",-Z:,:-::"--1,-..••_._ •-....--_-_,--•,=-- -- _ , , -- -, -- 72e_."... -1• t "-i"--V,-.1•'•,, ',.:-`4_--';'-`'.-''-,_----- -=-. - _ s ; L_..,....L. . 1„,„--- • t .„,,...ar;--=-9L, - •-,:vil- _, --• :, .",i,1:11„, -I 1' ' ..•:-; .. -;,.,., , ,• - , ... - 1 ililli _tliiiitIllt [ l . . - 4,0' * r -) ,:_.•i 4t -p --il • 4' --LI I._I I I I I .1._ I_ 1.A LI _I _ __I , , . lirt. ir".--,,,1%.341):i .-•- ' :.••.'- ,:;,',-,,,aaoilli ,11) 1 IIit"'r' "416.1,71_L''4..E-C,- ., •; -i.. IL 0 i V -0 r ,:z1 it . , .,.,. imie tiiii- 7 jat-..,.,,,-. . J.: , T- 1 1 1 , 1 1 , 1 i Joss 4. 111111411111 -.... diU. 11 -11 iii legficraa, -ill' is-. Aillillgailll I i,4-= _1,1 0 s' 0. z_ , 0' , iw-titl IIII4111. 1111i i. i 0 mr 1:I ..... - itillitil 1 lilt" I - I1 i ---- I - 1 `tr?,„1 i 1 19--r 1 ..f riiii - , 0,11 , 11 , 1J11111J. 1111. 11111131111111 1111: 1 '11r-et----z.?iiiiii 1 r--1. ,--'41......."I 1. 1111 h vs 1101312 , i riiiiirlfN/ 'NUT 1 I T .I " l' 1 T T Iii P iTi- r " ---4, ,, , , , I 11 , , 1 I . 1 , Ili 1 „- 1 , 11 ,- r-- via— 1 1 I I 1 ill iii v tn,1,,, .._ 0101 011. ® 1 .,•-k• v"0.44.,7*--r-- v-tr• 0 `4- c--;-?•t;s;•-:--iiii-ND- it-I __x IIIIIIIIIIIII ei aN 1.• IitillIWIllapt 0 - -. 0 7f. .• . la Wil11111F111 sia-061''''' i14 I 1 PIww- -.:.:: a.' N‘,.._aL•Jr ' - ------ A''' --- voilla.......joruIrg 7- ® t al rfi . '8416 4( 2-. C.:)-----04PC11 dmidllijil ' ---• '. 1. I l' I I I I 111112H1 r 1 I ri Ili I 1 ..1 i 1 ' . --- -''" ' 114111:11131:1111110.11°' 1 j®. i l'.: 11.13 Vig ............ 44413fflif0ist;•0** t ilitiiI deVal." Au rilk...-Vt. ' s•--, •-. L.,13 iria _0 „. ct 0 3 0 11., 1 111HIIIIli ! II 1 1z. .-----. .._1 4 ...r. ..-.....,,,er-Vo,_,...,,o """"" v„. -- - , - ----" r"'" .----'".".• ' ' 4tif k-r*, skeret,...-%,./' 4'1,1-•"\-1 oca p-/----L/ \....;"•--- V••••...7-14,1905 4 1 r_-_77..-.1E.:-. .= .- 'Z." .z :L.:.. 0Co .1=' " 6. l.t:71-ifz) 14. A Isl fie.-e•-o! twarrepa- 1411gret .-.- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 217.11's. cg.k.1% ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM f d, MpR 19 1979 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. AZov'e — /r'02,3-7 J. Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: , Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. the Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of'your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers'you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval - is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is' a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various' types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does .not apply, just answer it "no" and continue, on to the next question. . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent 1)1zL i 4.11 1 .- J EI(244--- 2. Address and phone number off Proponent: 12,O. 1e )L '1 V 5S S a 1`-K S LA,i1- 5 4—2 c ' f'/ 3. Date Checklist submitted ai — '4:i •— 7 4. Agency requiring Checklist 712 f' <7 ) 9 pia 5; Name of proposal , if applicable: J T t LUG C v G J u l () 14,0- 6. Nature and'brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other\ factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): e—t Lt,j Fi o l L. b lint C. hi I P 11 it g--it • 2 1. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal : 1, rev( 0+ 1 [ c sue( Le µ.L 1 c C)N- AFL— f K. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : G U4 i 1-(:.Pe 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: i't ('f-.Lc kc Fit-(c i c, 2.La c_._j GA.. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: A,t A II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "'.maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in 'changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) , Change in topography or ground surface relief features? - YES MAYBE 0— d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES— MAYS N e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE 0— Explanation: 1(911A t-u'11.- ( ride.) 5-b I L i r vi-c-C 70 `t 1--k P 11-c CALF" S 10?-N\ w-64r& rA-- 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES AM BE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? Yam- MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in -climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: `i 1 L-u7-41.) -f--- Ci r-4-- N rt`i 1Z 'f0 I c 49 !Lc , iic Gl 121ac_1 LC" 11, $ A 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? 1 - MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? TES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? WYE N- f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? 77 YET- MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either j through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? ES M YBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE N Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs', grass, crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YET- MAYBE NU- b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? TM WIFE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE N d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 6 YES MAYBE - NO Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna . (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE N0 b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered., s.pecies of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement • of fauna? YES M1 d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE W- Explanation: 4-11i lL 1vLc2t) _co1`c 3H- L 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation:Cak ZllC_,0 Lc.,s 1`tc9 1`-i S 10-0 VZ 1- --4_Lm 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? . YES MAYBE TO-- Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: CC (re. "-( Wt 14 .04.C, 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES M YBE NO Explanation:1 -C C 1 -1i-S ..— si 5 G 10) Risk 'of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) f in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NU I Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YEs- MAYBE ff0 Explanation: -4=-11-t 0 1 101'4- 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal res'ul`t-• in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? p/ YES rMAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE N0 c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MM d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? TES— RATITE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? TES-- MAYBE f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? r/ TES— MAYBE WU— Explanation: 1-1-k j2- l-2 t t ILL t L /,2.ik (r ttp I FL t k e-ice 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES M BE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?•L YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: PO 1L4 Rs Pot- P f 112.%c, fie, 1C)Acr 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES— MAYBE Explanation: 16) Utilities-. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) , Power or natural gas? V YES M YBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c)(c) Water? f1_ YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBENO e) Storm water drainage? t/ YES RATITE N(— f) Solid waste and disposal? di 1 YES MAYBE NO Explanation: P 11 L i e' ft -( Oft Ll t t 9 ,1C#1 bf0 , 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? VT MAYBE NU— Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES M YBE NU— Explanation: 20). Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YET- MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful laack 5f full disclosure on my part. Proponent:LQ". ,0 - 1\ 61l}`\t, -1,1 , signed) i.( 4 e iz,1 lz Rlt name printed) le( ['1c City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 N 7'O CITY OF REfdTON iftE.sRE7ONEAPPLICATIONp-"" .a r FOR OFFICE' USE ONLY I-- N. .+ Z LAND USE HEARING 0 \ APPLICATION NO.Ifs/9 EXAMINER 'S ACTION 0''. APPLICATION FEE $ /50,0O APPEAL FILED ArA ck, DRECEIPTNO .73 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION N1Nf FILING DATE .=1/cj'-7e9 ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . .Name. Deli in R c Abre j Ar. . Phone 772 68 Address 8204. S. 124 #h Se a,ttie, is .ih. 98178 3. :Property petitioned' for rezoning is located on 4th Street (Cemeta: road) between Monroe Avenue nd 4th. Street ( Cemet .ry Road) 4 . :Square footage or acreage of property Five Acres 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) t14-r2 ":0 v;t4 I.4 CA- 7 14-4.. lac,R t t4-'-4-' Ka, 1 v g- ( )gL 1 tfi ts-; Sv L 4 I4- (TI,s-(- f_--- ,,,( 1 L~i-K„. sz,0 i 4 F-14-0z f e.. U A-ILA w12- t c .-icy IA clr 1 w u sit 1 Q s2_1 i Ti-1 1 Lk Cr ,r, T( w • lit b , I,t V-1 - Ci- CC9v wi crGq-S t4 s,Ck ie,v" ' . . C. C S Fz- rt. .4:171-71-0--(4-re. 0 ) 6 . . Existing Zoning 4 65-1 Zoning Requested R 3 NOTE TO. APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form, in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Aia .rta gent site 8. ; List the measures to be taken to 'reduce impact on the ,surrounding area. n 0 /-41- -(0 s (1-4-1 it .-( a, . c4.jZ. v cc,c I)it,x() 1 9 . , How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? j-s 569 o a1 ifo7 (p6 s c, 13 t k -( -Z 7 -` R.e C-i 4-6V,{ P-e-) V lc(-(0 . U 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of 'ownership are : required. Planning Dept. 1-77 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR: DELFIN R. ABREJERA Rezone Application, File #R-323-79 N.E. 4th Street and Monroe Avenue N.E. THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION .9, TOWNSHIP 23, NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WGM.9 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH- AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES OVER AND ACROSS THE WEST 15 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND OF THE WEST 15 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF. THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WON., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTH OF THE ,SOUTH30 FEET THEREOF. i-.. hr. regand clear of liens, encum• gNED AFFIDAVIT i9197 ' 17NGDES I Delf Ir. R. .Abre l er. . being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 19 day of ac_AA 1979 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at A 13v,2tJ a^ De]fi R. Abrejer U Name of Notary lip) Signat e of• Owner) 1501 -o`er 2-oe 4 8c,0 Z Address) Address) 98178 Seattle ANash City) State) 77268 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application. Date Received 19 By: II Renton Planning Dept : 2-73 OF J m. Y°;' . k` O THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 n ® w CHARLES J. DELAURENTI D MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0, o 235- 2550 0, 94, SEP1 ' O P March 21, 1979 Delfin R. Abrejera 8204 South 124th Seattle, Washington 98178 RE: REZONE APPLICATION; FILE NO. R-323-79 Dear Mr. Abrejera: We have reviewed your rezone proposal and environmental checklist form which you submitted on March 19. Due to the scope and location of your proposal , we will need a detailed traffic study of the site and vicinity showing: 1. Point(s) of access; 2. Projected traffic volumes from your site; and 3. Evaluation of the impact, of the projected traffic on surrounding public streets. We will need the abovementioned information in order to proceed further with your application. It will expedite your project if you can supply the above data as soon as possible. Should you need assistance in locating the requested information, please feel free 'to call our department and we can advise you on how to proceed. Very truly yours, Gord Y. Ericksen Pla n ng Dire r d avid R. Clemens Associate Planner DRC:ms May 21.1979 cck- E-N To4'\\ M . David R. Clemens Associate Planner City of Renton Renton, Wa. 98055 Re : Rezone application - Pile # R-323-79 Dear Mr. Clemens, This letter is to inform youLthat on May 18.1979, I have contacted Mr. Edward Tasca, owener of a property on S. 180 ft. of W 1/2 of S.W. 1/4 of S.E. 1/4 of SW 1.4 less 165 ft. of S. 130 ft. Thof Ifs. Tax # 0923059231. I requested an additional 15 feet easement on his property to provide access to my pro- perty from and to 4th st. I explained to Mr. Tasca that I need a total of 30 feet easement pursuant to my request for rezoning My property to R-3. I offered to purchasethe.additional 15 feet at today's fair market value, but Mr. Tasca indicated to me that he is not interested on selling., or giving part of his property for easement since he has plans to develope his property very soon. In view of the above conversation with Mr. Tasca, and his unwillingness to cooperate, I find it extremly difficult to meet the city requirements in rezoning my property. Therefore , I have no other atternative but to seek legal advise from my lawyer in accordance with the city of Renton's proposed plan for that specific area. Hoping for your favorable response, Ii am Very truly yours, Ocak 14, Ce6Vra-- Deir R. Abrej a A- 01 CC file. ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: 0 Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Parr.-Department Odice Department Public Works Department 8,9A41ding Div. Engineering Div. (Please erify—legal descript c O Traffic Engineering Div. O Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his desi ee) jeZTE :G-1 PLEA REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : 4014:Azht LOCATION : N 11e iimm APPLICATION(S) :ftje,, IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING C # RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: C] Approved Not, App ved Comments or con itions : tr— d 1 Signature of Director or Aut or ' zed ep esentative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Q Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department QPublic Works Department 8 Bui iv .ngineeringngDi Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee il 06 V SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ' . r` * - ; Aps. ication No . :7 000 Action Name : ,4 e tax. r Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : I /fi % Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ' J , p // %=-/==/c'. f=_ A/1: /W7 r /iU 6, II- ISIGNIFICANT I INON SIGNIFICANT Comments : i y -7 Me-7- e- /2/or,Lim E/_i 6 / 7,-.2, i ,<„,,_ a e,R-- -- t1 1 s/ , Z/// /die a 9 /fl c ` --J`7 - Liles/ / 7-a/)-47----l Jrn, q 4.4,U,z_7,.„ C,3 A2- /a/4 , , A D & z,4 f r v) i 7/ b e .7-ie'ci ci Sv Ce cioJl- -- 74% t-i°4-7 V C/"' vele. /0 1/>f e----14---‹ e, Z,---- r. --Z-(__,/ • —z_-- __J C1/2/7, Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative /9 Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department Public Works Department 0 Building Div. gineering Div. (Please verify legal descriptic Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his desi cc) 4,./. NOVa115/ATE : 0/01 PLEA . REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : i1 L LOCATION : 1 .v.t ./ : , ti.IEAll- 110ridlIrjAilirr AVA APPLICATION(S) : 0157m. IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARINGRETURNANYCOMMENTSTOTHEPLANNINGDEPARTMENTBY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Depa Ament : Te.g/=j/c C-,Uc,lye c--e ire CETApproved L._J Not Approved Comments or conditions : V;7/77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department rr Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div . c2)/ Traffic Engineering Div . alp tilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his bAti a i? &&X/ 46 4/ SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 1; Ap ication No . :7 Action Name :oft,b409 g' e, I6f0deS"1th"r/ Please review the attached. Review requested by (date ) : G , il, Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : T/e.: L-- SIGNIFICANT 1-- I NON SIGNIFICANT , -' S sS zL ffe x.S'Comments : , C Cf1f S 2 frt.„,:S" . ,ti;Sy g,,( e60 %/26 rCo4, ,e_ !Jy /sI7 i, ac./vg1 c7d.c. S>TC' t2t V of,— 7 fi,4,41xj .S)I/rwti ,c4S sli % /-776"---r" /icc SS Qee" - 647- , 7 U./,C. /4.vr,, G1/.C. / 4Pur/2 c-z,7s ,,e o cc,-"Pes-vG 4 /77 Signature f Directbrt or Aut on epresentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (A -'i O "T SIGNIFICANT TNON SIGNIFICANT Comments : ai/ Ca FT t C - S 1$Tc-a OO-- chlte,(7- SawlSn. “ 4PA10.43-0 toolYzCa- Pc nneS q- sew - /'+• 5 i Ofik______,_ 411V71 Signature Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: 0 inance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department 0 Police Department Public Works Department J Building Div. Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description 0 raffic Engineering Div. add/---jj Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his desi ee) fge0V! ATE : 1 PLEA REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : i APP'LICANT : LOCATION : 114141 /,CAZ7,41/4ap445674,004 APPLICATION(S) :f4XtL 0.e ,4-79 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING # 9RETURNANYCOMMENTSTOTHEPLANNINGDEPARTMENTBY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department :7decf Cakl(pproved Not Approved /9 c ,..w//G x AS Comments or conditions : Ar Cj7,/,gcs lemzei ,'4 75 ,....1es7 ,.1 7 54,u/€2 /=fi' IC.4-a/t /1n/y fc.e for e'c.ivs72lec?i.1"- , S/,7"- CZ.or°M f /'G v d',4 w" 0e5 , of /46er reeegS dui i s6-xZS t-r 7 per Gr•fc fr" G/•7s.0 'ee</,ce zf le:6:.0 r-G ---e e- C- - 77, Signature of Direc or or Aut on ed Representative Date 1 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Dep rtment :14%'Lo-1 ()VT oden Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : 01 S4 F r w/r/G2 SVC psi, Cima6•G- is Siren 1 110„11:y' 4.„0-y64- d- $u,.JC•2 11.ANS i Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department : Q Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: J Approved I Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY' OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: p Approved C= Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or. Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C7 Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department Q Police Department Public s Department Building Div. OEngineering Div. (Please verify legal descriptic OTraffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his desi ee) e deleM1665',ITE :Ofr PLEA REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 41 .&.7 LOCATION: 01:Ard,r, Aa/741/4001416A1/44 APPLICATION(S) : IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING # 9 .RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : I REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (ij621;) 01_21.:,44proved LJ Not Approved Comments or conditions : Sign e of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public irks Department 0 Building Div . Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee 16/b '6 V _Ii_____ SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 1.? , s' ; Ap , ication No . : n o7 Action Name : ,Alc.' ne 0 / "/:. d6 I 4 '''' cs,PzW Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : G /I / Note : Responses to be written in ink . c REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 11(-Q) I ' SIGNIFICANT DLNON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 24. - 6._z. _____-7 7- Sign u of Director o Authorized Representative Date v r 1 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department olice Department Public Works Department 7iding Div . Engineering Div . OTraffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee ei66/06AO SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 0; Ape ication No . : 1g ',/ ~;!101 Action Name: fo/`"/,/ ehr 0906 C r 0/ Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : oFilr %I9 _ Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : CijSIGNIFICANT 167rIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or uth rized ep esentative Date OF AV., J er THE CITY OF RENTON 4g:,r j MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 oOMER CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9q 235 - 2550 0, 917-EDSEPSce0 June 12 , 1979 Michael L. Smith 3402 N.E. 7th Renton , Washington 98055 RE : ABREJERA REZONE , R-323-79 Gentlemen : The above referenced application has been reviewed by the Planning Director as responsible official , and a proposed Declaration of Significance has been prepared (copy attached) . We would appreciate any comments that you may have on this application and declaration within the twenty day referral period provided by the City Environmental Ordinance . If you have any questions with regard to this application , please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours , Gord9f17Y. Ericksen Pla ning •Direl acid R. Clemens Senior Planner DR.0 :wr Attachment cc : John Tilton OF R4, THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENTo 94. 235- 2550 o94, SEPSEvt, June 12, 1979 John L. Tilton Homeowners Association 3511 N.E. 6th Renton, Washington 98055 RE : ABREJERA. REZONE, 8-323-79 Gentlemen : The above referenced application has been reviewed by the Planning Director as responsible official , and a proposed Declaration of Significance has been prepared (copy attached) . We would appreciate any comments that you may have on this application and declaration within the twenty day referral period provided by the City Environmental Ordinance. If you have any questions with regard to this application , please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours , Gord n Y. Ericksen Pla ping Direct j/ '1 -. ita(6•-=.-2 David R. Clemens Senior Planner DRC :wr Attachment cc: Michael L. Smith THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 IrS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT yti co• 235 - 2550 OA?/ is 60 SEPSG J June 12 , 1979 Washington State Department of Transportation District Office 6431 Corson South Seattle, Washington 98108 RE : :':b U,JERA REZONE . R--323-79 Gentlemen : The above referenced application has been reviewed by the Planning Director as responsible official , and a proposed Declaration of Significance has been prepared (copy attached) . We would appreciate any cor:ments that you may have on this application and declaration within the twenty day referral period provided by the City Environmental Ordinance. If you have any questions with regard to this application , please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours , Gordo T. Ericksen Plan ing Direc o 6D id R. nens' Senior Planner DRC :wr Attachment OF R14 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO RENTON, WASH. 98055 sea CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT vti 235 - 2550 9gTEC SEPSE' 0 P June 12 , 1979 Edward B. Sand, Manager King County Building & Land Development Division 450 King County Administration Building Seattle, Washington 98104 RE : AMIREJERA REZONE, R-323-79 Gentlemen : The above referenced application has been reviewed by the Planning Director as responsible official, and a proposed Declaration of Significance has been prepared (copy attached) . We would appreciate any comments that you may have on this application and declaration within the twenty day referral period provided by the City Environmental Ordinance. If you have any questions with regard to this application , please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Pla ning Dir or vid R. lemens Senior Planner DRC :wr Attachment OF RA, Z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT o9q 235- 2550 09gTFD SEP1c4C?' June 12, 1979 Deputy Director Ecological Commission Department of Ecology Olympia, Washington 98504 RE : ABREJERA REZONE, R-323-) Gentlemen : The above referenced application has been reviewed by the Planning Director as responsible official , and a proposed Declaration of Significance has been prepared (copy attached) . We would appreciate any comments that you may have on this application and declaration within the twenty day referral period provided by the City Environmental Ordinance. If you have any questions with regard to this application , please feel free to contact us . Very truly yours , Gordon I. Ericksen Planning Dir G'GLX I 4 iavid R. emens Senior Planner DzC :wr Attachment OF R/ lt 116 O THE CITY OF RENTONC, 0; z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9.0 co' 235- 2550 O9 TFC SEPScoz June 12 , 1979 State of Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 4350 150th Avenue N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 RE : ..-, pAEJERX R E..3..- Gentlemen : The above referenced application has been reviewed by the Planning Director as responsible official , and a proposed Declaration of Significance has been prepared (copy attached) . We would appreciate any comments that you may have on this application and declaration within the twenty day referral period provided by the City Environmental Ordinance. If you have any questions with regard to this application , please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Direet,.or tC<°'' 4David R. 'Clemens Senior Planner DRC :wr Attachment OF R4,4 40 THE CITY OF RENTON t$ © z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 smik CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9A 235- 2550 0, 9gTEO SEP E , P June 12 , 1979 MEMORANDUM TO:C. J. Delaurenti , Mayor Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Richard Geissler, Fire Chief Hugh Darby, Police Chief FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director By : David R. Clemens , Senior Planner RE : ABREJERA REZONE , R-323-79 The above referenced application has been reviewed by the Planning Director as responsible official, and a proposed Declaration of Significance has been prepared ( copy attached) . We would appreciate any comments that you may have on this application and declaration within the twenty day referral period provided by the City Environmental Ordinance. If you have any questions with regard to this application , please feel free to contact us. DRC:wr Attachment PROPOSED/FINA .)ECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANC;" NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-323-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-443-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Rezone to R-3 ( 30-unit per acre Medium Density Multiple Family) on 5 acres between N.E. 4th and 6th and between Union Ave. N.E. and Monroe Ave. N.E. Proponent DELFIN R. ABRJERA Location of Proposal North of N.E. 4th 600 feet west of Union Ave. N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS El is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : 1. Lack of public access, and adequate circulation. 2. Land use/neighborhood impacts (density) . 3. Adverse grading and vegetation removal. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( final ) declaration of non-significance : 1. Provision of public street access other than to N.E. 4th. 2. Reduction in density 100 units or less (not more than 70 units zoned R-3) . 3. Provision of detailed site plans, grade and clearing and landscaping plans. Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title ii_ :.o•i .r Date June 12 , 1979 Algagor Si gnatur- ;`MO` _ Circulation : ' • is Wo Mayor City of Renton P• lice King County Planning Department ire Homeowners Assoc . or 5-76 group I I 1 f I f r I1 rW*"r-L"V N T N. i F and 6 1 ) i i__ I. l i 1 F,Ng‘r-__, , 1 c-,,,,\,....,-, ,-, 7- 17-CPT-77-i7.)--T-sr t11 i L I f 1 i 0 I I I 1-7'-I T. i 1 o' 9 I I i 41,0„ i _d C__I '`; , , 1._.2.17; 1-,4 r C 0"-.1 Z f--A ;c--,NJ f-4 IG I-A 6 r- L. '5 A\-,r,A_ 4....... fotif,:-",:ip- A-- 44,....,,,itiot- ; .,:._. ,,,..1. z., 7-- -- b I .- 1 di mo t . ® . ®1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 ,11 L ..1 II 4111111111 14 i o ii i 0 A„•• m rf Q J is TPrP\\ si rxr:... 3+ 4 1 alas -., I I r I I 1 t 1 I I sueA13 t SS` 10. 041014..I I I i 1 I Ital 1 I I tadaa10otitIIII .I I I I. I I I I t ° ' (f ° o off_ Foa i_ 1"-Ntr...... 412.1 ® '`e a u, •r..,rz. I I , I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 ' 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 , , 1 1 I i i I ; I I I i I 1 i e-— J A I I I I ' I '- r a__JIlIIIJIIlIIlll ('llllll 11I1. 11II,--- 1 . l , c- r—itaiI fil1 .7 1 _ I ->r y y-I I I I I I t .i. I I ( Stu. i I I I i j l i j j i j T i I 1 r '` Nit a Zs i Av a ; J P c I I 1 4a I I I I 1 ' 1 1 I I I i i I r) 1 I I- 11 1 1 I M L. ` I i i 1 I I LI I I I Ii _1j Ii±/ 14 i O O O ,II* 1 I I I 1 I ( ( I I-- 1II 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 11O `. 10 a O p 1 1 KI 1 l I 1 I .i4_,. -. :1p _ O Jr5..,T taOee: ` , •/7i.' ,:. . _.I I I 1 1 sa I I 1 I I I o I („I-,l:•e>1,- ma' s-• 1 ®33 0 { 1 ri I I I I I 1 I I I IF `, Aan ®r L- .ct ..n i I I I I I I I . I I 1 1 1 I S 1/' y u. - ir ?. a sIG Q1,+8 vs, c eFr .7" :5 ri v_ c.m a _. Co to .e\ E. r., P 4 N 7'lib°. I'o' r OC Et o THE CITY OF RENTON V o © r MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 = 2', CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4, 235- 2550 4, SEPS O June 12 , 1979 Delfin R. Abrajera 8204 S. 124th Seattle, Washington 98178 RE : -'ABREJERA REZONE , R-323-79 Dear Mr. Abrejera: The above referenced application has been reviewed by appropriate City departments, and the Planning Director as responsible offi- cial has proposed that a Declaration of Significance be issued. This proposed Declaration of Significance is being circulated to City departments and other public agencies with jurisdiction for review and comment. These agencies must respond within a period of twenty days from receipt of the proposed declaration. Should the comments from the departments and agencies clarify the matter of your application sufficiently , a final declaration of either significance or non-significance will be issued. Should you have any comments upon the attached proposed Declara- tion of Significance , we would appreciate receiving those in writing within the twenty-day review period. If you have any further questions with regard to this application , please feel free to contact us. Very truly yours , Gord6c Y. Eric s n P1 ning Direc r i Olt avid R. Clemens Senior Planner DRC :wr Attachment I . INTER-OFFICE MEMO TO Chief H. Darby DATE 6/17/79 FROM:Lt. D.R. Persson RE: Abrejera Rezone After reviewing the entire area, it is my opinion that the rezone and subsequent development would be beneficial to the Police Departtent if the following facts are considered in the development of the project. 1) Traffic access - be provided onto NE 4th, NE 6th and possiblyUnionAve. NE from the site. 2) The access onto NE 4th from the site not be constructed with mounds of dirt and plantings being placed at the driveways, as this type of construction causes serious sight impairment. 3) A two-way left hand turn lane be constructed on NE 4th. 4) Our additional manpower and equipment needs be considered due to additional population. At present the area has become a common dumping area and motorcycle riding area which causes many problems. The area is also used for criminal activities (i.e. ) rape, drug contacts, and last but not least the homicide of Smalley. I believe a developmeno that would go in and clean up the area and block access would be a tremendous benefit. 7-71- Gfrxei STATE OF I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Imo'-01WASHINGTON 5P) Highway Administration Building,Olympia,Washington 98504 206:753-6005 Dixy Lee Ray Governor July 2, 1979 Mr. Gordon Erickson, Director Planning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 City of Renton Abrejera Rezone, R-323-79 Proposed Declaration of Non-Significance Dear Mr. Erickson: We have reviewed the subject docirrent and have no cents to offer concerning the subject proposal. We would appreciate you sending all future environmental documents to Wm. P. Albohn, Environmental Planner, Highway Administration Building, Olympia, WA 98504, as we are responsible for coordinating the Dep- artment's review. If you have any questions, please call me at 753-3811. Sincerely, ROBERT S. NTFT SEN Assistant Secretary Public Transportation and Planning 7(4,<1,i,WI--I By: WM. P. ALBOHN Environmental Planner RSN:kar WPA:WBH cc: J. D. Zirkle R. Albert Environmental Section may•, 1 I, 3 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 11, 1979 TO: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director FROM: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Abrejera Rezone, Access and Traffic Circulation The attached memo indicates that the subject property at the present time is landlocked by abutting properties and should not be considered for rezone until additional right-of-way is obtained to improve overall traffic circulation within this area. 624, v c. PL: ad Attachment 114' ab JUL 12 1979 Lj/7/1/G D j MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 1979 TO: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director FROM: Paul Lumbert SUBJECT: Abrejera Rezone -- Access and Traffic Circulation The subject property at the present time is land-locked by the abutting properties with the only access via an easement at the westerly side of the parcel to NE 4th Street. This proposed development will generate approximately 915 vehicle trips per day (30 units per acre x 5 acres x 6. 1 trips per unit) . The proposed single access to NE 4th Street would cause undue delays to through traffic using this route, due to left turns into and out of the subject site. A project of this size should have more than one egress/ingress for emer- gency and safety of the residents that will locate in the proposed units. This area is developing at a very fast pace with very little additional public access being developed at the same time to improve the overall traffic circulation systems within the area. The traffic volumes on NE 4th Street have been increasing at a rate of approximately 8% per year for the past six years, which is about twice the normal rate of increase per year. Access to this site should be looked into via a new public right-of-way to Monroe Ave. NE from the southwest corner of the site. This would improve the traffic circulation in the area as well as bring the traffic flow from the site into a secondary arterial (Monroe Ave. NE) which has access to the major arterial (NE 4th Street) by way of a traffic signal . 4,4a4946«,‘"for PL:ad Zee pF R 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U 0 0 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 94 co' 235- 2550 9,4 SEP , N MEMORANDUM August 4 , 1980 TO : Clerk FROM: Planning Department RE : DELFIN R. ABREJARA REZONE APPLICATION File R-323-79 This file is being forwarded to you for permanent filing . The applicant was requested to provide an environ - mental impact statement on June 12 , 1979 , to support his proposal . Inasmuch as no further action has been taken to date , the file is considered to be closed . wr c``- pU0 1 80 - VN REC J ED ., fr-, CITY oF1,IcE `';Ytmows \. ),