Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-3364.4644°411 pi,A ----LP 114.00dkrintrifte i• : 7 t ' '
ti
4 ' .,,,,' -..'It.
4F',
7
is e4
9 2 a
ft, .... ,„__ft,,,1. . 1.
If.- ni : ). .
N SCALEij61,4t7. 39 I'aT._ra
rl
G
g 4. .
5/ 73.o'Z w;rL4j,j+
otop P_d.
7.
4'
n'
1,+
l „so ..4 •.;07.2-11 c.. ti:V•<ve-,4-5:7 fI,S- . , •B' p;.4tj r 0/44. .,54 s."
4*EZ....
ia.!¢ w-ra a. Sot r 4.-.
a r:.4t--+20-9 fie ---
N.B1 - 8 rN
1 f I 7/,mac S_.. • cL
5 1Z/ `, /
I 1' 9 0•• ,
A i
7 ••g.. X. 147 / .
w. .4-
xo 'p• 1
Ite '.
s •
R r I // '
Qrle4.
19 /9 ;
N: o t
Q 2 • 0 0 doiC915?;-1-9 ti N
o No illg.
1.1v
d-f ` t Alp
4
00 00 y654. .
I,
Li
W I' 1 1
r! V.i
1 r CJ' o7e39
t G. 44• os le 5 Z
s- sr*A-... '.4- 4 c i'
r 9a t:
b Arlo / A , g9 f''31'`6•B 9P2c1
4
r ,../•
0r
I 4‘ • 1
1 73 III . ' Z• '6. .. .,.
4 ,li...c.,, --'''''i
1 91 s p4
ibir
17 Ab. Ivt 0/3 0 W i :,02 5
A o a'
9
y
dd r crs • yG0 2 F k4
iltil•
oo'
b
N8i•i9'S/6- t !$i!t b s
Z 7b t703o M:
i
r ,, -
4K s Ct i _
3 r
fl o•j
N d "o^,
4- . -4.*I . 40
r/
t
4 02 6S I4:4' '4';' /4 -1 . . ,
i my v fn. i ram.,
il 7"_:(7 /
Y f 1_, Ju t *f s p:4 >
4S W
Ck): 9si....,.f /
1 .t) 51 I - t'? A -0/5 0 2,
moo, uq lri:rtg 'r, 72 ti184 9d:r a6 , ]•joe-' -
r C
r.A, hi
1
cR•/ 10
l l r 9 `
Y
1 p 1, /' , ,
j7' .'1°` kX f N8¢-II-4oEa! 1©.
oo.
s J c• II fb, k` 2. -
33 7
I $ 7 y =.
5. ,
V h riG til t 1
Ne.ao . 7 tih tli e a J05 .
11.4
ti oq + oo y Q
ti oho V N . o
a
116:::;0017
oito
it. :1,.11..
t''
if:.,....„.'. :4‘).
1.
1, ir: . ,
0:4
s. 4•a `
c 1q Z• b i
VP a q
r CC"' tc T``
J e 9. gt
A.
fin'
t. '
S- G P j 1cosAjibJ
67
E
N 1 0 0
I.
2y 'p
Aggz _• , 6 is ;2 sz-o9 a 3 :41
2.
R-
as-
O
1.\ ,:,/,,O32ead7
4 lC1 O,
r
9g,
1 3 21 . o 3 1''c \_Y
t z i N+ F 3
f!. ‘
4.
i.
4..
i.
1,\:_1 Nr.-... '.-v-
i-/-•._ . '-;_
Qt_
I•* :',
c-i
S SE.. 7I D
ti
I' • 1- 'N'
i.
r:
i '(.'
li 1
r11)
31
bl:)
7ii: ' ' ..Z` -....---
tJo A (
fi ,
n
r- 4 NS67. /Q9F S o/.p
or't { 1
y
1 gJ9-44 1 W 80
Y. .V Y
d q 5 0a+; ::: , • • ,,,,:e. ',
w Jr 9 r
I
I N -dY-4Sw
O/Sy3
B_?.?A'y -s 95A54 t GC Ql'y N • tl125 • 4. O
4 oz r Doll),' • v 9-6:i4 r- + f
9 ^ice,
t
aP.e9 1:7
of 1
7% w 1't/ 6454 ' ' CO.' 4 ZrJ 70 Jn l
N '.
8 9 4 ;,
R!\ /F CO 03 T y '0l2 6
1,,.J
p« *:
kjj
ae‘: i i'
C4,
k.i
jj
0,
o
Z .. It .S e.,-oqE pJg5 4 OG YO t
4,"sc'J `O 11 ilo3 h f tii o, •c , /s
5. 3 . .- N 7 ` 1 M1
S1.0 it.,AC° , Ur(A i.Z.. Mit flAUSILIZIrT3- • .0P'.N W . 91 . - 1 e, egor3 cra
C. ....D . , 3 . , . .
r ti cYO.I 3r Par_ LE 1 -1vICeras
S ,h QD L.G.
v P.ar r t
S /.
1 S/o.0a
8O
w- —
7Z.1 1 A r r%V Ht?- .59 k2
rZ.
r 17.(• .,i/ tit -'' L « eek v s', ••S•1•
t I 1 •,t
r 9
o .sIe0`14? V. Q ,
v
11
y
0
t tiqir
1(i`
12 •
0
1h
r 1 t 2. ' 1
1
c-lz if' ' 0 k-'
e .°:;
iiii .
4-
f yC i•+ `.-1 '°T ° 'S G 9 wZ ry
jr .1 VP .
111."
4 6 /
1 \\ r 1,
0 \
vsS Et/1_
0 00/6 „,t 6S—
z7 II. :
j,.„. ...:.
4-11,z7 o ,
ikt i
t 6 '
d t l 1 o0
ii1 1 O 0 3 S
r iiyAwb.* Jzllr I
4 7 tr
de° .4=2-.44 1 A :' *..- - - ,
Nr
O.*:a 6111k44**N4 4,
g,...,• ':',
1 • -
ii.; ,., ..% ,
1 • /
r LN- Itt,
r Q' t s. ti di, '0045
N.. .• 4, Si"4 'o2e..)
I or ik 0
L, \
r.,
it. ( li"/''' te• MI e 6 4 lir: '
ti
l
klil
3/•
4 Nit
ek 0••• CO 4`- pi' N., ,r A. -
irc, 1.':- :
1.
624 '
4. I.1 - 1
v
h h i{intQ
P
t lt1C) s to
41 i i{ 7
t L. i/b Y o N I
iV t,{
si / , 4 N. 4 i N
t
I'.
X o 1 Si/f 1i
S 1H c 0 I
1 Si---it,', 7.'" h\<4, 1 1.-1 .,'.olle _ ;‘,:' .
v f,\ ef 'A.9$
G
S
rht r "i 1 +
f
I „e C. ,,
RECEIVED ic.
ay,'rt c
1,
1
CITY Of RENT011 i fr.. y - _...._.
HEARING EXAMINER
1
X ittil.1131t
1 "'
l .
NO`
G
rNf•t.
er
J '
Q.. 1\ •t.1.MAY 2 21979 At t
AM PM' Q '. i
V9.4 f j -, i • i' g .3'•
71819 4;1j11211121314 516 Y z i i`T it )
5S
qq
7t' . ______._._.
6 °7
64 I , --
7-
70 4 r, ,
aim ._ ! Cd 97-e.
ea..3 n , 0 i I i
t Or 44 I i 1 (ji
1-6- 0 °' ?e!ia •
I r 4 tt
4
2 1-,., . f.... ../o.y I Nt)e--50-4.8".v 4jr
1 t J T 1 .
A:.5 1 1 . 1, 41,. 1 t.l•. 1 ~4'
OF I
A
rt
THE CITY OF RENTON
b '` x Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055
0 y, 4fr, CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
m• 235- 2550
May 9 , 1979
Frederick R. Brown
1126 Kirkland Avneue NE
Renton , Washington 98055
RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2
TO R-3 , File R-336-79 AND APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL BLDG . IN R-3 ZONE , FIle No : SP-337-79 ;
property located on corner of N . E. 11 th S.t .. and' Kirkland Ave .
N . E . , east of Sunset Blvd . and west of Lynnwood Ave . N . E .
Dear Dr . Brown ;
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on April 16 , 1979 A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for May 22 , 1979 at 9 : 00 am-
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department, 235-2550.
Very truly yours,
Gordon Y . ,icksen
Planning irector
i
By :
avi emens , ssocia e
Planner
cc : Gerald Edlund Assoc,
Suite 409 , 15 Grady Way , Renton , WA 98055
Rowe/Harris and Associates , Architects
Wenatchee , WA 98801
MEMO RANDUM
Files DATE May 16, 1979
TO
FROM Sue Hudson
SUBJECT Hearing Examiner Report, Mailing List, Dr. Fred Brown R-336-79, SP-337-79
Per request of Dave Clemens, copies of the Hearing Examiner report and the agenda
were mailed to the following residents on Lynnwood Avenue NE in addition to the
regular recepients:
Resident
1081 Lynnwood Ave NE
Renton
Resident
1075 Lynnwood Ave NE
Renton
Resident
1069 Lynnwood Ave NE
Renton
Resident
1065 Lynnwood Ave NE
Renton
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: DR. FREDERICK BROWN , R-336-79 , SP. 337-79
MAY 22, 1979
PAGE TWO
4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable
habitat for birds and small mammals .
5 . Water: No water was evidenced on the subject site .
6 . Land Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped.
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The surrounding area includes a variety of light commercial , single
and multiple family residences , and professional office uses .
F . PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : A 10" water main runs north-south along Kirkland
Avenue NE adjacent to the subject site and 8" sanitary sewers are
located along Kirkland and NE llth Place .
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per
City ordinance .
3. Transit: Metro Transit Routes #107 and #142 operate along
Kirkland Avenue NE adjacent to the subject site .
4. Schools : Schools are uneffected by this dental clinic.
5. Recreation : Recreation uses are uneffected by this dental clinic.
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
1 . Section 4-706 , R-1 ; Residence Single Family.
2 . Section 4-709A, R-3; Residence Multiple Family.
3. Section 4-711 , B-1 ; Business District.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL
CITY DOCUMENT:
1 . Land Use Report, 1965 , Objectives .
2 . Policy Statement , 1965 , The Neighborhood and Community Plan.
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the site will not have a direct impact .
However , future development of the site will disturb existing soils ,
increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise
levels in the area . These impacts can be mitigated through proper
developmentcontrols and procedures , however .
2 . Population/Employment: • Additional employment will be approximately
20 assuming 6 employees per 1000 square feet of usable office area
3270 square feet) .
3 . Schools : Not Applicable .
4. Social : Not Applicable .
5 . Traffic : Additional traffic is expected to be approximately 245
traffic trips per day bsed upon 75 trips per 1000 square feet of
office area . No traffic counts are available for Kirkland Avenue NE
but this traffic level appears to be well within the street capacity .
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a negative
declaration of environmental impact has been prepared ,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT5
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
MAY 22 , 1979
APPLICANT: DR . FREDERICK ;R. BROWN
FILE NUMBER: R-336-79 and SP-337-79
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST ;
The applicant seeks. a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3
and concurrently requests approval of a Special Permit to allow
construction of a professional building (dental clinic ) on the site .
Site development map attached)
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : DR . FREDERICK BROWN
2 . Applicant:DR. FREDERICK BROWN
3. Location : SE corner of NE llth Place
Vicinity Map Attached) and Kirkland Avenue NE
4 . Legal Description ; A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department.
5 . Size of Property.: 24 ,000 square feet
6 . Access : Via Kirkland Avenue NE
7 . Existing Zoning ; R-2 , Residence Two Family
8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-1 , Residence Single Family ,
minimum lot size 7200 square feet ;
R-3 , Residence Multiple Family ,
minimum lot size 5000 square feet;
B-1 , Business Use .
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family
10 . Notification The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date .
Notice was properly published in
the Record Chronicle on May 11 ,
1979 and posted in three places
on or near the site as required
by City Ordinance on May 11 , 1979 .
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND :
The subject site is part of the original plat ' of ,the City of Renton .
It was rezoned from R-1 to R-2 by Ordinance #1922Tdated November 29 , 1961 .
D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND :
1 . Topography : The subject site has a moderate east to west slope ,
and a more sharp slope from south to north . The total difference
in elevation across the site is approximately 8 to 10 feet , or an
average slope of 6% to 8%.
2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material (AmC ) . Runoff is medium,
erosion hazard is moderate to severe . This soil is used for urban
development.
3. Vegetation : The site is primarily ; scrub. grass with a few, deciduous
trees located along Kirkland Avenue .
LANNING DEPARTMENT
RELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER r17
UBLIC HEARING : DR. FREDERICK' R•, BROWN', R-336,79 , SP_337,79
JAY 22, 1979
AGE FOUR
9. The Fire Department advises that fire hydrants and access must be
available prior to building construction , and the buil-ding
construction is required to conform to the Uniform Fire Code .
3LANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : (SPECIAL PERMIT )
1 . The applicant proposes to construct a one and one-half story
dental clinic on the property described in the foregoing rezone
application.
2. The subject building will consist of 3270 square feet , of office area
and 1524 square feetof storage in a lower level daylight basement .
The total parking requirement for this use is 16 spaces for office
areas and one space for the storage space . Proposed are 27 spaces
for general public use and a separate lot area of 7 spaces for .
staff use only . Design of this staff area is substandard , but as
auxiliary space alternate design is acceptable .
3. The structure has a wood exterior treatment with a flat roof design
and decorative wood facia on the roof and entry overhangs . Due to
the flat roof design, rooftop equipment ;('if .any)'. should be
architecturally screened to compliment the building .
4. The applicant'.s:, submitted plans for landscaping are very schematic,
but do provide direction for consideration of future more detailed
plans . The public portion '.of the parking area should be screened
from the adjoining residences by a combination of fencing , evergreen
hedge and evergreen- trees (4,2204-8-B ) .
5 . Per the recommendation on the rezone to reduce the area of the
staff parking (property being rezoned from R--1 to R-3) , the final
design will require modification , and screening should consist
of evergreen trees 8-10' in hiehgt on 10' centers on the north , east
and south property. lines .
6. The Traffic Engineering comments on parking are apparently confusion
over the proposed parking plan . Per #1 above , more than adequate
parking is proposed .
Additional comments of other departments are attached for, consideration .
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : (REZONE )
Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of the rezone from
R-2 to R-3 only , and
1 . The R-2 to R-3 Zoned area shall be screened by a minimum 10' deep
landscaped strip consisting of a tight-, sight obscuring , evergreen
screen ,
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: (SPECIAL PERMIT)
Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of; the special
permit for construction of a dental clinic in an R-3 zone subject to :
1 . Revision of the staff parking area to conform to the, area and
screening recommendations of the rezone ;
2 . Final Planning Department review and approval of a detailed landscaping
plan including sight screens per Analysis #4 of the Special Permit;
3. Final Public Works Department approval of plans for public improve-
ments per appropriate codes and ordinances ;
4. Provision of : fire protection per Rezone analysis #9 .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE. HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: DR. FREDERICK R. BROWN , R-.336-79 , SPc337R79
MAY 22 , 1979.
PAGE THREE'
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED ;
1 . City of Renton Building Division .
2. City of Renton Engineering Division ,
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division .
4 . City of Renton Utili'ti'es Division .
5 . City of Renton Fire Department,
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ; (REZONE )
1 . The applicant, proposes to rezone 2 parcels totaling 24000 square
feet at the intersection of Kirkland Avenue NE and NE llth Place
from R-2 to R-3 to allow construction of a dental clinic. Also
proposed is the rezone to R-3 of 4000 square feet of an 11 ,000
square foot R-1 zoned and developed single family parcel adjacent
to the rear of the primary rezone area .
2 . The subject request for rezone to R-3 is generally consistent
with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies
a medium density multiple family transition between, the business
zoning to -the northwest and the single family use to the south-
east.
3. The proposed rezoning of '4000 square feet of the R-1 parcel to the
rear will have less lot area than would be allowed under the current
R-1 (7200 square feet) minimum lot size . Due to the clear difference'
in the proposed dental clinic and the existing single family use
of the property , a future subdivision or lot line adjustment may
be sought to divide the R-3 and R-1 zoned properties . In this
instance , the remaining R-1 zoned area would become non-conforming
due to the lack of required minimum lot area . The area of the propose
R-1 to R-3 rezone should be reduced', or eliminated entirely .
4. Although the area may be in transition from single family to
multiple family , this transition has been historically quite slow.
The single family uses facing Lynnwood Avenue NE are an enclave of
well maintained homes that have been surrounded by multiple family ,
professional , and church uses . . Certain measures to protect these
single family residence uses should be provided as conditions of any
rezone and site ,development. Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report,
1965 , Page 17 , Objective 4 , states "property values should be protect-
ed within the community for the benefit of its residents and
property owners , through effective control of land use and enforcement
and application of building and construction codes . " Objective 6
also encourages "the development and utilization of land to its
highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest
of the comm,4nity and contribute to its overall attractiveness
and desirability as a place in which to work , shop , live and play . "
The stability of this area for rezoning to R-3 from the current R-1
appears to be a totally unwarranted intrusion of 'an intense use into
a single family area .
5 . Due to the topography of the single family parcel , which slopes rather
sharply from east to west, visual protection as well as land use
transition isf.c,rucial . The proposed clinic use intends to place
parking in immediate proximate to the single family lot. Although
landscapedscreening is proposed , consideration should be given
to heavy sight obscuring screening of the parking . area .
6. The applicant's letter of May 1 , 1979 ' (copy attached ) addresses the
findings required by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to 4-3014 .
7 . The Engineering and Building Divisions indicate no objections to the
proposed rezone .
8:} Utilities Engineering notes that the water main on NE llth Street
is substandard , that water and sewer fees will 'apply , and that water
and sewer plans must be approved and installed .
v/0,
4:::".....si: 1,n 0.'r••'•
1 NI V I/ ih.-/) •••• •
0 1 11
I ---.- I i
SC: 1s_ - I • )100 L.G.. i i
c.c.,f!d•T r•btr-dg05•_. ,• :-‘•"•41 •
7.• ..-- ---,-1... ••, !:.......
n):' ''''
It 1!y?7,,• ,1, . • / leV r•P7/ •7
z3 .•• •
0 , 6464 ".e...,-. ,•.7 - " •
i7,
Tii i . ...,..,e.,
u r411.11.3T ,
I .I. : ; '1 ,1 .1''''•.* V•.N. P ti---t -,/44..A1,,,.. ,,,-
vi•;1 4 iki. .-.
s,
syv, 11' •I 1-44. .q r.
1 x.
I I w 0
6.4' ', 0
f?/
I ..' '• !
1
1 ;I
q' I' N
I . I 4••
cc
0 0 , ' . /
t,,
c
s. ..„,, ,..,,,
f
0 • ° c 0 ' , e‘ .
I I
2)3 "j, • 0.. ' 0'.1 ,t •L,'• 3'
Nr;r J-
r,v. , „.. II* ir ,
4
6.i4 , t...„,,,,,i6 .11„...• ?lb an i t4:r.: t • " MAL A.., . .--., -,'1. iA ,, :LI
I e. r \./ 4OP:ft, i• 1 •-•"="
3'.' 4 4.,. •
4.....) t-
11,I 4 ;S."7.?! .."4'
iill$.1../.
9:-•-• Oig•,4,r •••• • lithi, l'
14. 4-'...'-'•
NO j Ni..,, =;,-;.".•'. '' 1vi, •, ;)••
4: Viy-,,,,,q,. - • ,,.:'.f, ,,t 1 • • 1 k'','•
cilz.-...: •") .3•/
3.3'; 1 • ,.., c.
isok• 3.3/ • ' .V'' t;to •Plio:44 .
L: .
1 ,,,
3) ,,, , .A.,,,,` ,3^„... '.4.:!,. -3,,•,•,;•,'.. -;, -
44111kt,
3.3-'•-
1''' .
3
al.li
7"..4'' I 6 ! '.`gt41
7.9 1.1 ,,
s k
n• -
k) c"'-1.'.:-.... ._ ' : •,
4,7.1%669 •''.' woo'A ‘1 , ,......
i,h. , ",... ---,•. ' A.,,,'
rip ..'S• /Ni r ,,,,,-,9rs-,-, .t.t., ' •..'.. •w,
4.,-v.,•,-,..e. .:- - • - ,„.„;, :;•, '':•4`
1.
41a;;,-'
42:.•,_ o, ,,,.
t, ji 0 ' 1 l'' 7, tr.j• ',Al - ',d1 4' n •
P, 1 :::, . '
4° Is. wo ,'".. \‘y 7., ; ,i'',•. 4,0, N.r 42.•I , ,•
irk
a• .
ci\./ •
i- '.',
1.4 ,nol5337.8
z,, ,, , •a• 1;
1,. "
N ".•. .. '' IP;•'
4 ••••••.4•5 p....,!
lik,
A ' .••I"1 -Qs-. — -41 4,1.
c-— - ."'"i: at:'
rt. Ct.. . • 4 i- p;',4 • it.."''''':''N Co 4,"1•••y,p
o Al'/C.) •,.. ,
0.,_<.• .. kJ ;;;;,'4, ' ii-. ...;"%'!,;(-.„,,,--•;','241,7 2.7.4‘
33.1-'
n'i•—:,.7 iis
v
o .. 1 . Sb. N1i,•..t. , 1" k ""- ',••114, a I t,l ,'1747'
r)
4•?,) ' lv.,:4 !14: • - ...
i. : r,..3 ,..-, 1, ,i v,, •.",,,---
Fi,... ,., -.4ii,,,, 9
33'''' N..33. 'g.• ; 3.3 ..,,, 3• • , ^-33300•47. AB . ..,„.„,.......--91-"4..., /
4 ,
t.„,14i. ,,": A ,3., , r •
1 11. ,• At, •r. . 4.,46 1117.114111 . . ' • .*. i4.) I i.W.' , I 1:;•,:r 3:1.. ^ 0-
3:.••• ' 4•% rs ••••••4 Jlimcillkill•4, Wel,"c 11 a•''''1.... it'
Vt._ ...411t,..- i JO i ti, : i:4110, / t
i 1 in S..,.• -14‘ : , e i‘l..-•'' ',,v 44. c, Pi 1 ro4.A:.5z?'t • .• . 411,-....,,,,://._..._.'''
vs. x'" . i •I't 1 tl',.'''',C.:•'•;- =;V. .. < , -4, i.th.t... ,
1 :,:!V •\ k _f3; ." ft. s: •• ' 4..1 \•• •
1 If • , I 1.'41 • 4•'''`..‘. -Pi '•••'2:1 4 .• ..k:1)• V--N. . .b.,/, ,„" 3 2. II- -••- .
4.' ..
v
n • — r,
s
1",:i. 6--; ,, - : --..,,, .-.`;,,•,1-i -- ".2...' ::•,.. '.
4 ,'t4' ...C!..1i ' 0) ,." '''
c '••••:' •••'
1'...°7s . p ' -''-' 1.:1r.;,"‘-.". t`i.I ' •u)7 e1
Ifr,-,. ,1,41.- . ,."-,..1:ri74 -'...!' • • . • ..1 , o .-44., : ' r4 - ; /.. .' •.' 1 -; 4 I ' '''," ,' 1 1
1,- e,..,_•• i, •, 1, .i' tf, :
N. V4'''' O'" I.., Iir
4 ... „..4,
1' likaaisii ,I In..•
c. t 4,;x :. • * c
1..'3•7
Y; ..,
7^
3'`
73-F:i•.- -
t•II:I /
7
e.f.I
I i
4^,,.•,• I, .
s^
3...^?
l..
I.
3,39 'i ,,,,,,- I .3As
s • ";•'.. ,-k,'• ....••.. .3., 3 r •I•I 'P WI i37.:3•••
3 • • '' •I' 1 7 i1:. •
0•..."1 s '47'
5 1• )3 I.J 1s4......„s...,:i. _ ,...3..' 1., ..1 1,C': •
A'' ' .t 1•:''' V ".4..' " t •'.'.
r. --
si
i• • ‹. 'r ., i.-I ...e I• '.n. I
0/fr. .,,,.. . J.', ; 1'r i i •••-7.i ' re .':I•
1 ,': 17 t• . 14'•';'i : '•i1 '',,.', , , K- 1,Z,e,•;‘,1-,. , , ,• 1 °€'
r)7) • a 1 1 1 .
4.• •
4,, .:i• ti . . .....1.----r--t-1-737 731 --IA, IVS
V
I: ' 6 I I 1-
i'le .4 • !.• I 1 11
I . . ' I
f•:. • . '..-' y. ; c$A. '. e ,—I . • ':' • W 1-'•
i . : V'.4 r v. -(0!) i/ :• •:
k .;'..:.
I Lt .. .i
f•• ‘
0
t' • , I,i ..4.,.1- ..?
4.
tc--..•'•',i5t' `,. '+: :-'•'•.-.3';"
r
s'• '''•
1 14-,:,'
qt'., 1,•,,'"
i.-•f-..
3:__•
LL
e•,, r,
1,7,-3.1.:4it.i'Ij,• 1: .
j
s' ,) .•
4 !••3':, "•
r"•Ar :
1•.;"",;11.I .
2
rs1)•')
w ' ,3 • s ,,;:
r.
A y t r 1 •., 7 • ."r lc el J I 141.:'t•.. tc • . , i
4. 11 ''.' ,1) L.. L., ' •. . ..14:-.l' I, ,-1,• 1
t" t ''' .,.„. ., ...., ......
f 1 ..flI Ito
s....','•, ‘
1 e ! 0 , I V 1
s 1 til1:r..-:
1. ... 1I.. . 4• c'..-'1•I' ,.1 • 9•_"..
7.
1..,..•• • •
i.
II) 11. c.- -1,•-•' ' r:
I••Li.L .I•1 . ',.• :
is
1 ' : . T 1•• I IV - '
1 ..1lf. _.1.; kr) • 1.1 1i1 'k • ie. "I
4•••.,,•z•P I
Z.;
h
ram. r-
a it`t a
i r- t. Y.
e
Fh
7
S' •
IIIWit'< .`•1 2r4 209 .t 7 I.. .
Jy
e' ,
r.. z• ^./
I,
Sr i r ccK j-. r-..
4:".. ..-- .... al r ,.i.
VAR-=. I .• . c.ig.4"--') . r... '. :-.-6'', -11-o.-, G S.,61---- 1 0
i1, a
21• t f"'' EF
itr1•Jr Imo• 1
le•
1 B r/j '
j[
t-'Ar5, .a•e .•
a..-` •
1
y { 1 r . in.' i 1. 1 of
Irl
i. 1 •
R_I :
1 o I.I 1 ,, " ,, ..`'' ` '' 1 1
1>(
1.-; tt
N nJ r__ ,p, I(/
7 _ ` _r r-,_.., ,,T •., ..
1` , • "l Ay
1.
8•
t '1 . 1 tea. 1
iiir 1 ;
t ® C r
9.i t gfW •(•/( rt /(, I
E , 14. 1 -
5 ••. A•'
i
L
1
ii __.,3 .
a ; J " /A-.,,51.[__'1qy•
n/• -, :
i. {,•- ', n.vti,_,
J `
2 ;
i "<^fi=,of'i '
O `
JC
M1=
11 `c.. •1 t i•{'111>
Z` - J ',
W`_
t +''
r / ,,
l• .i-1
J If bp• r. /• 'nJ • t'•' I.
I" y•S,- dr I
t _
r d . • .1,9'
1 A ..y:-*, pj•a
1•
r •t'ti'- o, -) -, f^-'r \
61
T _
Sf(moil • •
I.' '
K' couJg 1 4,
M
1• .
N• •IO; p •
L W!i•...L'-- A tJ't T- • ?. J•' t .+
1
t \' 1• /•7 tJ.2 4 17 •4. +-
1 •rv;(• . T.'`
1j
I
l, , "
e i•s lt'11
c. ..,:. . .;::--,my ;./ ••2 ": .: , r • 13
E••- ''.•44 •' k-;:-.....," .• '•-----4-•'P
is ,:'k....LI 1{4! t:A. .i Itc--- r - 's'4- 11
Ji 1
jnl. •I•I1 } T_M
t` '
1 1
tr. .'
M. .'
r,•••., ••
I JJ•''''' .'. ..
I.. O2. 1
T
i < " 55
i ,
2 I J••i•. •'1'1'1.!. L'.1,•,_i_'1J'.` ,
1''':;;:;' .
1-
1-'
1 ',',. 1I . • t c:•1.I I} — ;,, FS '
10., ••-;:.•
1•
I -` .:.
4.:. 11=4 —.--fir.-, . .'
i. , •of
1 1 i I t IF •l L• . „I r L it - ''i. 't of M .•15 W•
1 4
1,,c2..ts_.1,,. q4-,.-{
7,-, •,-,,,,-,
t- - ..• -ft,t,trdt
i
o< 11•,I•
I /• „ •••: .,
1 • 1 •;• -1
1 _--•,
A•
r Jt :c+ _, o...•- • tt•_51,2_,F: ,'.!' :i;;:i
f1 rF'.': y-
ttj
1f
i .._,,,7 .:,..
3* fl • 4• i L j- }'L-'.;_1-:__;..__•1 v F_`F
I : ••1••II•
11 . • ' N E. 7'+ $'11• ii 1< E -,,,,,,,,T.
4~'' 'n
a J!
yr • 1 : I • + ' • },a °'•t'
Z I zr t,(
r. T1
L..-.`
i ',+14, ,, ---4
1••. ••
tq-
I ••
1 ',
I
e • ' _ . . c < , ,.k C..
4 - J., • l+.,
w t..,
ie ' •1T
r•
S J•A I I _' ,.....,.._..._..r.. ,.,.-. +-,..
w. -• f '
O
1'• .
Yi.
ti
I f1. ..;r T 1
1.-\ ,\)' & ` •
4,
tµ10 2—r 1--t '••a n,°. •;
n-
i!.: <.\., '• n. y .. l • I
i' 1•I f`'.}} r '•;.` •.: `N 1, 1 -
t .1;•. • `:},I
f7• ,•• -t•
a
7.1. • ••
I. •'. .' '•1 . ± ,'`'. - 1• +.'i . .
1
NC. TMi•.Ti . • HEbn. < I •0:.1_
U
p.` 4.
w
y
J-
p,t,
1I1
I 1• o . 7• t LLi.. . .j..11.. 11..'..
L+ •'•I
Lt
iii• l
t . ,;!--4--- .
1
ILi t • I
baj. it •-•A •1,'. . - ) i
e'
2---'=--
7DR. FREDERICK R . BROWN
R-336.-79 , SP-337-79
i
r
APPLICANT DR1 FREDERICK R BROWN TOTAL AREA ±294000 sq ft
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Kirkland Avenue NE
EXISTING ZONING R-2 , Residence Two Family
EXISTING USE
Undeveloped
PROPOSED USE
Dental Clinic/Professional Bldg .
1 Medium Density Multiple Family
COMPREr ENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
COMMENTS
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
CTJ Park Department
O ,Police Department
CPublic Works Department
Q Building Div.
Engineering Div. (Please vertft_lqqal descriptio
0 Traffic Engineering Div . -
0 Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his deempep)
bAWD le? DATE : 10 ;10P
PLEASE REV! THIS APPLICATION FOR
APPLICANT : 4NE7 Rataj
LOCATION : 2.4 'al
1
APPLICATION(S) : ie,..60VPte 04?
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EXn W '
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
4 f
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
r-1 Approved r--1 Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
Vo c.)6 7//
7
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
4
I 1j ra.ems
f' r- SC A.L E 100 L..G.' i I .
7 I,. sn'.nt ,/ ..•r.,"f t• ty N NN a ISh. .P .' 2.
616'.I • 1 9 -1
a
1 4 ".
I
i b 1`1 h ' a
it
1 ..._, P. i\.... \
11' V \P , i 4
i 4;4",
6l I • i O ^// g„ fit
r .,, ,
t' .
e •
1.,r h
I I •
11. 6 r' .I`,, S
if, yam\ p•I It' ••.I.1Y`. I I<• I I ile.
u(! Nil Z S I .
I
i
ok.• ,'•
Iiiills,
c. ,
2 'it_ / ,,, \ . t 'r ' ' . r.._
ri-Igef---- > 4 . ,;. ' ' 4 •,
t'
l.
V5
ti
tktii .
t,,, ( ra. lwwr•.9'si °.Y•
44,' "• .
o. .. w 3
f d lA r'
II 1 ,. fl I,OF
1:—. .P A ' .
ales [. .
Or p. ,.,. , ,
1,
v. ..,_.,...1..tx ,. ,,, 9 I 1 ''' •
J .;/
t O'
s utl1HI L
a'rtt
4 •b ,
LPoiii , t.
I '
J 1 f I C f t
1•
r)
a•
f-> t1 'liJr'i k
y
L_l?V I to I i J
I 1`, -I' ijl f`\
1
71j. a ''#.
11f I
i
S 1'•
r ! 1` . '4W it K ''Ilr xt}
a +
n I I I
i.
c.
yyam i%.
r/, , /2,
1'- O ik, 2 r ( 1 +•w,
t r • -
0,1 . ''
G+i"t'_
S 1 1 ,;5.. \S
r r jj I)
ji
r
i_.,... , i... ,
Is' c.
j ;
11 to
Il1 „„ ..,1i, ,.. fi ' 1 i 4000) . '..Ii‘1
rJ 11....:2ii'.. ::(
c.'
b . Q
r If v j
s
t,•/
lv/•ul
vv f• I•::
S. . .r °e . _-tlL_•' .. `
I /
I a~ i' IIfiI
7 j
4'
t•- \
av 1 I a'
I
N-4n_-,7. .
J *I,
I ® ,
19 o -,_ =I L• L '\
I': i '.r:
1 n`, ../` j
7. ,- •• tin '.•n { y
ti I I -.f I ,/
I''' ,ant ' j n,,I< I 1T • 1-1
1 //.
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATiun
TO: O Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
0 Police Department
O Public Works Department
O Building Div.'
0 Engin'eering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio
C`5'rrl/ \ O Traffic Engineering Div .
fir`+ CrUtilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Manning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his de ' g ee)
WO j. . DATE . y
PLEASE REVI THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : i1e
LOCATION : eEP r"' /ifo
APPLICATION(S) : 402regie• r
O/-
79
0,7, 1
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EXA
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Now:n -1 lA Ti L I T‘
A ed eh
ti(v/L 5 5'in:vr i. i,. S Zc N&
J 1 / 54 l% Sy/St,. r eL +Gh.7 e 416.L L-4,1
rt—
wl cS2 k Av' /+(Liidcl0 l R-c(:/L 1n`°n4 4- .
3 plc
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY -DEPARTMENTS :
Department : C
A roved 1 Not Approved iSG.%Yr /1( s_, `"G4% j'`cv /-`` G"
Comments or conditions : 4c(i,.:/`n,vs , riy/e6-// 4it
r .
1,1t L.,/) /1 '
c
7 t - - w' /e. a,'L/j' ( /1., 2c/G/%c
S r..l.L
i) /` „/,. i; •'%','%.',2i- .Sit/,}, /_ < //L/.Si//l c•"/
c/:/.L' /C <<. /c../ alac_ C'
e
Signature of Director or . Author/ zed Representative Da
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: O Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
OPolice Department
Q Public Works Department
O Building D,iv.
QEngineering Div . '(Please verify legal descriptiot
OTraffic Engineering Div.
O Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his de g ee)
0410 difigfil( DATE : 4401
PLEASEREVI 'THIS (APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : Oe: /a V
LOCATION : 410 ler//fLl4
APPLICATION(S) : Aekeegt5 O 79
Itiefe4 i f ”77f
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EXA N R
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :0 AY 7 . .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : Y1. . 1)
Approved CD Not Approved •
Comments or conditions :
C 1,:- - - --41()'-
e"''"
C tte'''.0-.e•-.. 7c71
s--_, CS——--2— —? 2'
Signatur--e`of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
J Approved r 1 Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING F0.11:-REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CL__AIST FORMS
TO : 0 Finance Department
illFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
CD Public Works Department
8 Building Div .
Engineering Div .
0 Traffic Engineering Div .
0 Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designeAto A
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Asplication No . :
0-------or
Action Name : telPik r ••• i i'
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : 17 If
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
SIGNIFICANT / ' NON SIGNIFICANTCorn
4 I 14 C.41„/ /.., y'LI ./
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
t-;
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR, APPLICATION
TO: 0 Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
O Park Department
OPolice Department
Ti Public Works Department
O Building Div.
Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio
Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his de 'g ee)
V/ 4 ' ' , DATE :79
PLEASE REVI THIS APPLICATION FOR:
APPLICANT : Pe.00
LOCATION : t !4 A
APPLICA7ION(S) : _frji,z,
6° *
S' 4 '0- *11 # ________
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EXA '• }'R
RETURN ANY COM MENTS TO' THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
D Partment :
7-4-:!,z2l=i=(E 2f1,/A1Z> c---Cl
Approve. Fep,,Not Approved
Co ents or cond='-- ons :
E uc' '-,
P21 ./i/
i) 1
2" . zc,_,,, j---:: -2___7_.,,,,,-7. ,..._.) 2
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING FORaREVI•EW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: O Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
0 Public Works Department
8 building Div.
Engineering Div .
0 Traffic Engineering Div .
rtr' Li 4 Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his
designee
ft' ' ' 4/11/______
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- A.plication No . :
f-• , -4 ,, / -
1/T/Ar ' iie 111: ,,,,„ii,Action Name : // I
Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : , •,o,, ,
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
la Ni o m S,G Ni t Fr(AL nr f
7 Ze/d// / 7-.)0S__,11/2 L,--2; ._
1---._____
4;13/71
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : j- (--____-___
SIGNIFICANT NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
C r---/ /---"---- _ c /S 77
Signature of Director or Authorized 7epresentative Date
i
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: O Finance Department
IIIFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
0 Public Works Department
8 Building Div.
Engineering Div.
0 Traffic Engineering Div.
O Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee4V Le dA544%1(
SUBJECT: Review of ECF- Asplication No . :
Action Name "- 1 .__6gehie a
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : . 117 O4
Note : Responses to be written in ink.
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
SIGNIFICANT NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Signatur - of Director or Au horized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY 'DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
SIGNIFICANT 1 NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO : O Finance Department
IIIFire
Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
Public Works Department
Building Div .
Engineering Div .
0 Traffic Engineering Div .
O Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee
4,. 1_:______OV
SUBJECT Review of ECF- __ A. plication No
1: / . , , „4„. .... 4e ,,,, ,,/i,Action Name il, L../ ir.,,,,, . '4
m
f / - 4 ' 'i
1 . 1/+
Please. review the att ached . Review .requested by (date) : , 0/ , _
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : - - - 1_,t ,,,s= ( L A-)6_/.1 Ez=&-> '206
SIGNIFICANT X. NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
a//77
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
PROPOSED/FINAL ,_,_CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE . )N-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No .R-336-79 ; SP-337-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-456-79 , FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Applicant seeks rezome from R-2 to R-3 to allow
construction of a professional building (dental clinic )
Proponent DR. FREDERICK R , BROWN
Location of Proposal SEcorner of NE llth Place and Kirkland Avenue NE
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to have a not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is
pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
non
Reasons for declaration of environmental/ significance :
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to s.uch an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
J MAY 16 , 1979TitlePLAN ,. G TD, ' ECT . Date
j
Signature .. '.!%6' _ 1. - .
11
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
NOTICE
I S pii y
GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS:
PROPERTY LOCATED ON CORNER OF N. E . 11TH ST. AND KIRKLAND AVE . N . E. , EAST
OF SUNSET BLVD . AND WEST OF LYNNWOOD AVENUE N. E.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE
RENTON PLANNING DEPT.
I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF
A PUBLIC HEA ,4- ING
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON MAY 22, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9:00 AM N.M.
CONCERNING ITEM Wi
REZONE FROM R-2 To R-3, FILE No: R-336-79
SPECIALPERMIT (OECO9NNSTRUCT
I
ON PROFESS I
ONALIN ) IN
IL LOG ,
Nc
79
SITE APPROVAL
S-33/
I 1 WAIVER
H SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERM11
I
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
NOI1CL UI PUBLIC HLl1RIN(i
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL. BE HELD BY THE RENTON l AND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON MAY 22 1979 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1 . WILLIAM SCHWARTZENBERGER, APPLICATION FOR REZONE
FROM G TO R-4 , File R-339-79 ; property located at
601-609 Shattuck Ave. So . between Burlington Northern
Railroad right-of-way and So . 7th St .
2 . ARTHUR D. GUSTAFSON , APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS , File
E-347-79 ; property located on west side of Union
Ave. N . E . , approximately 200 feet south of N . E .
10th St .
3. RAY I . CRAWFORD AND ROD T. CRAWFORD, APPLICATION
FOR VARIANCE FROM RENTON SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM
TO ALLOW PERIMETER LAND FILL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE ON LAKE WASHINGTON , File V-351-79 ; property
located at 5117 Ripley Lane No .
4. FREDERICK R. BROWN , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2
TO R-3, File R-336-79 ; property located on corner of
N . E . 11th St . and Kirkland Ave . N . E . , east of Sunset
Blvd . and west of Lynnwood Ave . N . E .
5. FREDERICK R. BROWN , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL BUILDING ( DENTAL CLINIC) IN
R-3 ZONE , File SP-337-79 ; property located on corner
of N . E. 11th St . and Kirkland Ave . N . E . , east of Sunset
Blvd . and west of Lynnwood Ave , N . E .
6 . JOSEPHINE 0. NUNN , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO
R-3 , File R-342-79 ; property located approximately
900 feet south of N . E . 4th St . , west of Union Ave .
N . E . , between Greenwood Cemetery and existing City
of Renton property .
Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file
in the Renton Planning Department .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THIE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 22 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED May 11 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn
to before me, a Notary Public ,
on the 9th day of May
19 79 SIGNED "1'
4111/
A404•44)•%
r\; ,
e.;:,!,...::
1(:
1-
ai I d '{
a..Yln' {
f
2 i--- .s C .y:.J - .- s SL,. 62:.. ,A'•ih% i.•xf, /` .NY
r v 34,4:0 dsra r :ma ti( ' r
j.*-,,....
i g-III Pl
I..:1 r.
2 . bldg. site ;`•
r,1 sib
a r` tp . 1-:
47,LiG!
l r.:;
Pt. • /
y• t/
i / v -iY" - -o+Y. c.r 3Y+{.,
JQ2p:1 Vf i
c VFk
H''
r5c:
v`
y d- ii2 Ct f
i
rrS^ s dc„ .` I v
mil-7 '
Z
r.s..• •• . .• w.-; ::. ,.„-•._'
4. ; :.... -:,•'...('"I'',".1.3.-i.•..k.W.44..,,,
s.„..‘..,
44-- , ; 4,;.)7 .v1
0.
VICINITY MAP` .$ ` 'O`ti Ya\ K r x jY3tr +; i r- a} t 6. -- . zt _}.r f ' '' 8 r1I
i GD c`0A" pry1a
S..
1 r u t
sgyp.
712.j
371.E
o"•
N:
w'fI'
i
2•
loitimr.
a k ' t.
t1 t.9,;..T ^t. '. t i ,felt 110
1 r ?;.c '+,
f' ,. ,1 w,.r.t
1If
rl!''I.I';
7,,III: ,:
vi
T PLANrs1ru
t tg 4
WEST E VAT I ON
2-
Y_'
R
r - .. N
7. Locatio.n,: of proposal, (describe 'the 'physical setting of the proposal , as well
as,-the:;extent of the'Nland area affected by any environmental impacts, including
and, other information- needed to give an accurate. understanding of the environ-
mental setting'dof the;,proposal ) :
In the `cr:.nter. of=the business core area of the Renton Highlands. On the
Sc Elt prrapor y ]'no is the Highlander Apts on the rtorch property line is
iamct that is Zerted R-3. A11 of Gracelmd-T©rrr.ece is.zoned R-3 except . .
My 2 Cats,-:lthich are zoned ii 2. s tic building will cover 13.6 of the land.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
Fat:t of 198O.
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local--including rezones) :
OhAn o of R. 2 to R'3 zoning
Special Permi'L'
Building Permit
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , .expansion, or further activity .
related to or connected with' this proposal? If yes , explain: .
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by ' •
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No •
12. Attach any other ,application form that has been completed regarding the pro- '
posal ; if none-has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
AU applications arc included with this proposal. • "
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
YES MAYBE TO
b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over-
covering of the soil?YET-- MAYBE NO
c) Change in top ra or ,gro d surface relief
features? Earth w.I1 be filled in on South property
line to beautify an existing cement retaining wv i 3. WV • MAYBE NO
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X
unique geologic or physical features?yrs-- WAYBE' KU-
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,- . .
either on or off the site?
YES • MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion 'of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which - ,
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Vas MAYBE N-
Explanation:
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTONr.1
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM JJ/ \ onurn
6
r,t,
J
g
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
1 '
Application N o. /1..3 > /7 c J I 1
Environmental Checklist No. --._(.:j=— f,36
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
Declaration of Significance I Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance [} Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C. RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent Frederick '`• Drown
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
112$ Yirkland Ave., N. .. "Menton, .`iashington 9vO55
226-1!l22
3. Date Checklist submitted A- r l 1, 1)?)
4. Agency requiring Checklist ,:ity of 1-ienton
5. Name of proposal , if applicable :
iro essional DUildin,; in .ienton highlands for Dr. i'1-ed. ::. !frown,
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size , general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
A professional building, mainly P'edical and Dental, split-level of
approximately 4,; 00 5q.:zt. It will have a stained cedar siding e:cterior.
It will be completely landscaped with ample parking and a drive aiound
the building.
r//' 4-
w
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species,. or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
YES tom.. NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
X
VEST.. M YBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d)` Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?X
6E5- MAYBE 07
Explanation:
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase .existing noise levels? •
YES Mr YBE NO
Explanation:
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?• YES • MAYBE Yl-
Explanation:
8) Land Use. Will the proposal •result _in the alteration of ,the X
present or planned land use of an area?E MAYBE NU—
Explanation:
This is in a business area and right across the streetet
from my eU nt" dental of ice,
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate 'of use of any natural resources?' • •
Y MAYBE NO
b) _ Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
YES , -E N
Explanation':
10) Risk of Upset. . Does the proposal involve a risk of. an '
explosion. or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? •
UWE. Nam.
Explanation:
11) . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area? ,Yrg-- NIT
Explanation:
11r
3- ,
2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air-X
quality?
YTUVE fir
b) The creation of objectionable odors?
X
It MAYBE . NU—
c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any. chenge )in,cl.imate;--either locally or
X
regionally?
r' YES MAYBE WO--
Explanation:
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in .currents, or the course of direction of X :
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MABE NO '
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
Y€T MAYBE tf6r
c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
A
YES MAYBE 0—
d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X
body?
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
YES` MAYBE NO
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X
ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO ,
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through X
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either. through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, li
or other .substances into the ground waters? .
YES MAYBE Ao' .
I) Reduction ,in the amount of water otherwise available X
for public water supplies?
YES MAYBE A6— ' .
Explanation:
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops , . r
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YES CBI
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X
endangered species of flora?
YUS. MAYBE RT—
c) Introduction of new species of flora into an. area, or . .
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?
YET— )iA Y.B E R4—
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
M
Explanation:
e
6
r (d) Sewer or septic tanks? f
YES MAYBE NO
X
e) Storm water drainage?
YES MAYBE 0—
f) Solid waste and disposal?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
17)„ Human Health. Will the.'proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding X
mental health)?
VES MAYBE !t
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the'proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site .open: to ,'publ i'c.view?'":. :Is:: . • ., .
X .
VB MAYBE • 0—
Explanation:
19) 'Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?,YLS MAYBE' NO
Explanation: •
20) Archeological Historical . Willthe, proposal result. in -an. .
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, •structure, object or building? X
vrT7 MAYBE, NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency' may.withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack'of full disclosu o my part.
A
Proponent: 1. 4
Ts gne
Frederick R. Brown
name printed)
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
5-
12) Housing. Will the •proposal affect existing housing, or X
create a demand for additional housing?VET- M i1 Y B NO
Explanation:
13) -Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular- movement? X
YES WEE, NO
b) Effects on- existing parking facilities, or demand
X
for new parking?
YES MMAYBE WO-
W Impact upon existing transportation systems? .—
YES ': O—
d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
X
movement of people and/or goods?YES - MIT' 0—
X
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
YES iRATBE
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , X.
bicyclists or pedestrians?YES ;MAYBE N
Explanation:
Patients will be coming to and from the building. -New
parking is being provided with the building.
14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result -in a -need- for new or altered governmental services
in any of the,following areas : i . ..
a). ; Fire. protection?
X
YES MAYBE 0—
b) Police protection?
X
YES ' MA •BE Nb—
X
c)- Schools?
YES ... MAYBE
X
d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES 'MAYBE . NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Other governmental services?
X
YES AIME. NO
Explanation:
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
X
YES MAYBE 0—
b) -.Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X
the development of new sources of energy?
YES MAYBE A(
Explanation:
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
X
a) Power or natural gas? YES )MAYBE F1(T'
X
b) Communications systems?
ref— M BE Wb—
c) Water?
X
YES MAYBE NO
111114
Fes„, , 1 ,.,
aa
qq
i 1 f i
i
w
fJ
J i I I I
t
sue'
i Li) `
a'` 4{1
I y 4t
r ,:
F IITilj 1 •
4 pa a s"
53
v 1
FORM L58Ei
Statutory Warranty. Deed
THE GRANTOR. JOHN RACAldELLO and VERLEIGH B.ACANELLO, his wife
for and in consideration f f TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) AND ( 'HER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION
in hand paid, conveys and warrants to FREDERICK R. BROWN . and tiARGARET E, DROWN,' his Wife :.
State,Of
the following described real estate, situated in the County of King
Var shington:
Lot 3, block 2, Cracelana Terrace, according to plat recorded in Volume 50
of Plats , prtge 64, in King County, Washingtort
Subject to all easements , restrictions and reser.vaticn, of record,
t1 hereto,
This deed is given in Fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between t e parties
dated February, 4, 19 64 end ^:or,ditioned for he conveyance of the ehLrt'e
described property,and the covenants of warranty ''nevelt) contained shall not apply to arty title,interest or encumbrance arising by, tnrouiah or under tie purcbeF.er in said contract. and shall not
apply to any taxes, assessments or other charges levied,' assessed or'becoming dui.; subsequent
to the.date of said contract.
Dated this 4th day of FOruary, -p64
r
t.
t
J - 1
r .
r._ ' .
r',.L(SW).
STATE OF WASHING;TON,
ss,
County of King
On this day -personally ;appeared before me John RacaaeI io anr.VerIcigh La.cancil i:7
to Me. known tn ti.a the ir,,iividval dc::tuibed in anti wiic £1&niea the within and furl.'„ning iti5tnumceni, arle
and vJ '+";, dl''
i „td -r1e +t r.ttel .r fie v,l r,tl,: ct anti th d,
acknowledged t'.t t till y , t44+""; ,.
GIVEN ur.dc. rn;.U:d oait`
Tyr-0.17y Pr!I5tie in on.:! for lbe ate of i,;ns 4i vihif?,
AFFIDAVIT
I, Frederick T . Brown being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers' herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me -
this \3 day of Pk `\ 19 "r1 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
Name of Notary Pu lic) Signature of Owner.-)' .- ,
1-0 1126Kirkland Ave., 1T.Ed
Address) Address)
Renton, Washington 98055
City) State)
226 - 1422
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the oing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be/+0o 'd complete in every particular and .to
conform to the rules a /4r -• kik' \of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing `su KLuc( .on.
V r1
Date Received APR 16,19it 99 By:
CI' 41
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73 '
CITY OF RENTON
RP_7.ONE APPLICATION
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
LAND USE HEARING
APPLICATION NO. 336- 7 9 EXAMINER 'S ACTION•
APPLICATION FEE $ /(x-w. C--6 APPEAL FILED
RECEIPT NO . .177 / J CITY COUNCIL ACTION
FILING DATE y J ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE
HEARING DATE
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 :
Frederick R. Brown 226-1422
1 . Name Phone
Address
1126 Kirkland Ave., N.E. Renton, Washington 98055
3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on
S.E. corner
N.E. 11th. Place Kirkland Ave., N.E.
between and
24,000 sq.ft.4 . Square footage or acreage of property q
5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a
separate sheet) p/ ,free 5ey/ 4,74 27
Lots 3 &44 Block 2 Graceland Terrace
as recorded in King County Plats Vol 60 Page 64
o4 R E
t
U 1919
APR
NG 'p
6 . Existing Zoning
R-2
Zoning Requested R-3
NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying
property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate
your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application
Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form
in duplicate.
7. Proposed use of site
Professional Building, mainly Medical and Dental
8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area.
No special measures are necessary. This is an area of medical and dental buildings.
My present office is just across tithe street from this location. Land on both sides of
the property is presently R-3. There is a large apartment house next to the south property
line.
9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site?
As soon as I can get a building permit and a contractor to build.
10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required.
Planning Dept.
1-77
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: DR. FREDERICK BROWN , R-336-79 , SP-337-79'
MAY 22 , 1979.
PAGE TWO
4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable
habitat for birds and small mammals .
5 . Water: No water was evidenced on the subject site .
6 Lund Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped.
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
The surrounding area includes a variety of light commercial , single
and multiple family residences , and professional office uses .
F . PUBLIC SERVICES :=
1 . Water and Sewer: A 10" water main runs :north-south along Kirkland
Avenue NE adjacent to the subject site and 8" sanitary sewers are
located along Kirkland and NE llth Place
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per
City ordinance .
3. Transit: Metro Tra,nsit Routes #107 and #142 operate along
Kirkland• Avenue NE ` adjacent to the subject site .
4 . Schools : Schools are, uneffected byy this dental clinic..
5 . Recreation,: Recreation uses are uneffected by this dental clinic .
G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE':
1 . Section 4-706 , R-1 Residence SinglerFamily.
2. Section 4-709A, 'R-3 ;' Residence Multiple Family. ' '
3: Section 4-711 , B-1 ; Business District.
H. ' APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL
CITY DOCUMENT :
1 . Land Use, Repor.t , 1965 , Objectives .
2 . Policy Statement , 1965 , The Neighborhood and Community. Plan .
I . :IMPACT ON THE.. NATURAL' OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT:
1 . Natural Systems: ,Rezone- of " the site will not have .:a ,di'rect impact.
However , -Future development of the' site will disturb existing soils ,
increase storm water runoff and have an effect, on traffic and noise
levels in the area . These impacts can be mitigated through proper
development .controls and procedures , however .
2. Population/Employment : • Additional ' empl-oyment . will be approximately
20 assuming 6 .employees per 1000 square feet of usable office area
3270• square feet) .
3 . Schools : Not Applicable .
4 . Social : -Not Applicable .
5 . Traffic : Additional traffic is expected to be approximately 245
traffic trips per day bsed upon 75 trips per 1000 square feet of
office area . No traffic counts are available for Kirkland Avenue NE
but this traffic level appears to be. well within the street capacity .
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance' and the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a negative
declaration of environmental impact has been prepared .
RECEIVED
CITYHEARINGO RENTON
XAMINER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MAY 2 21979
PM
NM
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 71819110111a21112131415,6
PUBLIC HEARING
MAY 22 , 1979
APPLICANT : DR . FREDERICK R. BROWN EXIHIBIT NO. /
FILE NUMBER: R-336-79 and SP-337-79 ITEM NO. t i
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST;
The :applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3
andlconcurrdritly requests approval of a Special Permit to allow
construction of a. professional building (dental clinic ) on the site .
Site development map attached )
B. GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 : Owner of Record : DR. FREDERICK BROWN
2 . Applicant : . DR. FREDERICK BROWN
3. Location : SE corner of NE llth Place
Vicinity Map Attached) and Kirkland Avenue NE
4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department.
5. S'i.z.e of Property : 24 ,000 square feet
6. Access : Via Kirkland Avenue NE
7. .' Existi,ng Zoning ; R-2 , Residence Two Family
8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R_1 , Residence Single Family ,
minimum lot size 7200 square feet
R-3 , Residence Multiple Family ,
minimum lot size . 5000 square feet
B-1 , Business Use .
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan ; Medium Density .Multiple. Family
10. Notification : The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date.
Notice...-was properly, published in
the Record Chronicle onon May 11 ,
1979 and posted in three places
on or near the site as required
by City Ordinance on May 11 , 1979
C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site is part of the original plat, of the City of Renton .
It was rezoned from R-1 to R-2 by Ordinance #1922 dated November 29 , 1961 .
D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND :
1 . Topography: The subject site has a ..moderate east to west siope ,
and a' more sharp slope from:,.south to north . . The total difference
in elevation across'. the site is approximatelY.:8'° to 10 . feet, or an
average slope of 6% to 8%.
2. Soils : Arents , Alderwood material (AmC) . Runoff is medium ,
erosion hazard is moderate to severe .` This soil is used for urban
development.
3. Vegetation :.,, The site is primarily scrub grass with a few deciduous
trees located along '"Ki'rkl'and Avenue .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINERAM
PUBLIC HEARING : DR. PREDERICK 'R, BROWN ,, R-336 79 , SP.337:-79
MAY 22 , 1979
PAGE FOUR
9. The Fire Department advises that fire hydrants and acc.e s.. must be
available prior to building construction , and the building
construction is required to conform to the Uniform Fire Code .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : (SPECIAL 'PERMIT)
1'. The applicant proposes to construct a one and one-half story
dental clinic on the property described in the foregoing rezone
application .
2. The subject building will consist of 3270 square feet Of office area
and 1524 square feet' of storage in, a lower level daylight basement .
The total parking requirement for this use is 16 spaces for office
areas and one space for the storage space . Proposed are 27 spaces
for general public use and a separate lot area of 7 spaces for
staff use only. Design of this staff area is substandard , but as
auxiliary space alternate design is acceptable .'
3. The structure has a wood exterior treatment with a flat roof design
and 'decorative wood facia on the roof and entry overhangs . Due to
the flat roof design , rooftop equipment (if any) should be
architecturally screened to compliment , the building . ,
4. The' applicant' s submitted plans for landscaping are very schematic ,
but. do,, ;pr'dvide direction for consideration of future more detailed
plans . The public portion' of, the parking area should be screened
from the adjoining residences by a combination of, fencing , evergreen
hedge and evergreen trees (4-2204-8-B) .
5, Per the recommendation on the rezone to reduce the area of the
staff parking (property being; rezoned from. R-1: to ;R-3 ) ,. the final
design will require modification , and screening should consist
of, evergreen trees 8-10 ' in hiehgt on 10'' 'center-s on the north , east
and south property lines .
6. ' The Traffic Engineering, comments. on parking are apparently ' confusion
over the ',proposed parking plan : Per #1 above , more :than "adequate
parking ' is proposed:
Additional comments of other departments are attached fOr consideration .
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: (REZONE)
Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval: of the rezone from
R-2 to R-3 only, and
1 . The R'-2 to R-3 zoned area shall be screened- by a minimum 10' deep
landscaped strip consisting of a tight, sight obscuring , evergreen
screen .
DEPARTMENTAL , RECOMMENDATIONS : (SPECIAL PERMIT)
Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of the special
permit for construction of a dental clinic.; in an .R-3, zone subject to :
1 . Revision of the staff parking area to canform. to the area and
screening recommendations of the 'rezone ;
2 . Final Planning' Departme;rt review and approval of a , detailed landscapir
plan including sight sc'r..eens per Analysis #4 of the Special Permit ;
3. Final Public Works Department approval of plans for public improve-
ments per appropriate codes .and, ordinances ;
4. Provision of fire protection' per Rezone analysis #9.
i
PLANN.INGDEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMI;NER ,, ;.
PUBLIC HEARING: •. DR. F:R'E'DERFCK R. BROWN,; R-336=•79 , SP=33,7-79
MAY 22 , 1979
PAGE THREE
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENT.S CONTACTED ;
1 . City of Renton Building ;Division .
2. City of Renton Engineering Division ,
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division .
4. City of Renton Utili'ties Division ,
5. City of, Renton Fire Department, ,
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ; (REZONE)
1 . The applicant proposes- to rezone 2 . parcels .totaling 24000 square
feet at the intersection of Kirkland Avenue NE 'and NE llth Place
from .R-2 to R=3 to allow construction, of a dental clinic . Also
proposed is the rezone to.,R-3, of 4000 square feet of an 11 ,000
square foot R- 1, zoned ,and developed single family, parcel adjacent
to- r the.. rear of the primary rezone area .
2. The subject request for rezone to R-3 is generally consistent
0wi th';::the. land use element . of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies
a- medium density multiple family transition between the business
zoning , to the northwest and 'the. single family use to the south-
east. .
3. The , proposed rezoning of 4000 square feet of the R-1 parcel to the
rear will. 'have less lot area than would be, al lowed under, the current
R-1 . (7200 square feet)- mi'nimum. lot, size. ' `Due to the ' clear difference
irn the proposed dental clinic and the existing single family use
of the property , a future subdivision or lot Line adjustment may
be sought to divide the R-3 and R-1 .zoned ' properties.. In this
instance ,:. the remaining R-1 zoned area would become non-conforming
due, to the lack , of,;required minimum lot area . The area of the propose
R-1 to R-3 rezone should::.be reduced ;, or eliminated ., entirely .
4. Although the area may be in transition from single family to
multiple family, this transition has been 'historically quite slow.
The single -family uses facing; Lynnwood Avenue NE ,are an enclave of
well maintained homes that have been surrounded by multiple family ,
pr.ofessiohal , and church uses . , Certain measures to protect these
single family residence uses should be provided is conditions of any
rezone and site development. . Comprehensive Plan , Land Use. Report ,
1965 , Page 17 , Objective 4 , states"property values should ,be protect-
ed within the community ,for the benefit of its residents ,and
property- owners , through- effective"control of land use and enforcement
and application -:of .building and construction codes .''-Objective 6
also encourages "the development and utilization of l and to its
highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest
of the comma ni'ty and contribute to its overall attractiveness
and desirability as a place in which"to work , shop , live and play . "
The ,stability of thits- .area .;for,; rezo,nin.g to ,R-3. from the, current R-1
appears to..:be a..tota];ly. unwarranted in;tr'usion of an intense use into
a single- family area !
5 . Due to the topography of the single family parcel , which slopes rather
sharply from east ,;to1-west', :visual ;protection':,as. well as land, use
transition is crucial The proposed 'cl'i'ni c use 'intends to place
parking I n. Ammedi ater proximate to . the single ,family lot. Although
landscaped . screening is proposed , consideration: should be given
to heavy sight obscuring " screening of the parking area .
6 . The applicant' s letter of Ma y "1;, :,1,979 (copy attached ) addresses the
findings required by the Hearing :Ex a;mi ner. pursuant to 4-3014.
7. The Engineering and Building` Divis:ions" indicate no objections to the
proposed rezone . .
8. Utilities Engineering - notes that the water main on NE 11 th Street
is substandard , that' water- and sewer fees will apply , and that water
and sewer plans must be approved and installed .
i ,
1 ......'•_:--r.7-4 t .. Y1 )si . i . -- w,
am/ 1
v
I. I
I
ira7.ty no.r.- SC.F,.
1 J
G'
U Prr,T 616Vi
T7.. .- --- -• M' ', t ./S"pr 1 I )I;r l N" / I. toe . . Iia.G B •
t '
AI.6A6t, r ` r. ••
v 1.1•fo Y4114 I'.r 1 •.,'T
t ,.. ,.t, i I•. ...i Iv SIN.IT • V 1
11 L ' yi ... 1/•.
I:/•I tr .
1/re,. S•I i! "
r{
Y y,' ,kr ,Y'•_+
y".•( ;/
sti
It
IY
liP •11 r:1. • •
V
v ,.! 4 ^r' •6 f-J
r " , v
14 v. .,..1,.,4 . .
yi ''' -* 1' 1,..•.;
e.'
I‘
4, . li: •s/ ••
1t)l—, 'c• • iii 0."
4 . .'
Ir• ,`NN'r9'JI/ ,/N , ,
I . '
M1
r",
Y rld a4 7I °
Y. V
or.,..., , gin i7. 'k! •
I
s. ''
1'1•
a
v i F a •..
n o/5
al`.i37Ff.x I
A, `
I )
n :
Q' 4 1 ` Io•11111k °`8 tee.
Q- Y,,,`t• `. `/ . fix w,6, „.
e4*.
L7 •II at* J A
r o s'' s
is v a,
t;,f
t 1.. :
c
o.'.:, 7t a tk • '?„ t7..
a
9lrraSr }I r, K iss...K. A v
y n
s o .,fll 4\
tiS` ! }F;g c+b.J' f Joo ,iw4y,' \
s
v
af b4•
10
I% ISf •
1•,
t`•
rlf
3`
I' I'\y ,
i
dt
I fi
a ,.
p.,
i ` r
1
rl..
a
J O is y„ ,,a I
1IAla
4
r
1..}.e.
P YR T•` - •.. ru
i
T i
w • a. h I31 ; 1,i 1
d r
ti ?rY _ -- j ;,r s ,
I ^
fG ;;
I I • 1••f e:
I YJ. I
r.
r
fit r .b ?"
1 1 c '' •r• • tr 1,r,•, r-n .I
I
f ^ .,
4
I.0 I . '
y
y •
r /
a,i,. < .I 1 YJ
vI- °
I
S. f.
QI
a
1,•r• •,i•s
I`7
97- __ •
7
I
IIiII` /
E`. .s, r, ._ ,.
1.,••
f l.•
k..£. ,,.
n 'v' -I/. '.I Y!ci.f.1, 1 • .
1—I ( .
z.
i
I
1 1 If w 1
3
J
I 11 1 •
t' tMe ' i s,' ....
w.
11116,
t. ._). aw, „ _d ~•!
a `•.'. 14.,;,,,.61,1 try ••••.•••••••
a '''
t'
I
Rao : t• '
i • :
1 f
T
A .
1, • —(
s + I __ - ! ,
1 - i
3e
r,
L
f r , !, /y G• `
WG `
o• it I
1 .,....
p
I
f .
j11 -r .{
t "`
i .,.. ``-
I- „ •. 1f. .
t
0 '•f /
f'r`\7` rar' N t,•„Lrt oyT 1 a_e , • 1 it--. 1T Z
pPA
E
1.to.. A+ •(i Y I. a t F A •j I `` •1' '• 1
ii, • .. 40 N ,9 : , , ,
1. „ .l i „ i4 4 f} fl ` td t.
I 1
1 I.?If lSrL •
a
1._.t.
to ` -1
N E fl Q
p ., • ,t'•
o•
1 .
1 QI•
I.I•
r i 1"•
1 .
SI • ' `(1tI
E Y J, J. )J,
I t 0 'jY : ;+ ,RI , = ;." •r y•l, ••
R. 5I -•r,rrt7 a •s•. 11rXJ
I ,. , • L a
t
a 2.., J.11 a i { . 1
91 1 1 ' ti1 fir 'J ,.
I J•
A
A.-
a
al.•,•ff,• •t•C,,, .. 1••I Jo f
ti
ll.i..14 t
ff 99
1G i.I {" ,. „_
17 ••• M ST '
F r' ,'
0
I,,'
4.I IIi1I.I .1•I.1 .. r._
N
I I•ry 1•" , I(
tr
I
1' . .,.
1.
1, {`" ,', ..
1y.
r•r .'. ..
p,. ,Ir
t '•I,., -rinll. I . ,'•. ••^'i; .
r _,I. )j 010
I' .
Y••j.- I •'1'jl ••i i L'..1.1,.:"N1.1'.
1,.
a.i a,J
y
e
p...«. _,
L.C.1 •• . 1', : ;,,, ,6 * I',tr,t•r:jf_: t
I '•
TI Grp.
t'
y 42. le .4..1,`, +[,l'l•I.1•lr.,l ' •W''i1 ...•rl.' .. I---•,, '
10F ,, .I•1,11 F 1 . ' I
J
I' , Iricni01f••{• '' i . • --
4' rStre.
0 •;• '
1
r..
4.•
L
l/^
W* „,1 •
1f'; r• • f • Ji 1 1•1J ••1•y •}- 0w.• t
1'
aI•4,, 51 '
M ,L, to { f•' • i - ..mot
I,
T•
ry
7 J1• :\'.
1j --`.4, •,il ,4 ."
I
1, ;1.-
1• J L•I.:• !C 1'. 1J 1..'I.t.:.,}•.1,•'•Y,,,,, .. l.. ,.t
if.
r
AI,
11
r ,. E_ '''
4'
1~ •
r A .1 't;I.:
1.
1_1-i 7F-1_' .
I +^
1.!V f _ .RO 111 -
4..
01 n• ?
1•
N+ a{ 41111011/ vn••J4 1 I1. !' tu p
J > "
rh • \\. _,l:M •"••• • .'
1 I i• = w T"' 1• + . y p 2Y• r;,•N c q
rlJl
i•,,.• ~
t-\ is, 1 t •V•' 'r
l- Yam' . F
j '
I
i•
rw
1:{'5„I: `. • ',>I' ,
ia-L-,1. .4•'•.1
i.' ,n,.-. , ..,i .. 1 1' ka•i'.1' :.
r , •
4 ' . . •
F , ;; , . •.„.:
ci
9 7 .r M° - ! ti' _ 1 11 'P iii is J m1.1-t r.
J• i 18` I I,..tY I ,Jtib•44•Al•' y:i i- , •P, ,>,1•
Lrj' . 'w • ;.e' '-1J2''i J • u +.y,.t ,. .I .. r1,•.;.. S..l,.•.;•I.1'1'"jel„. __...... ...,.,.......k:••;........ --
t.
ro.i I."
i'
y
r a,
r .`4 •.
r .
I 1 { ^ ° •J
0 1 '5 ;•
1 ,"'
T t . _ ., . ,
I SR."' I f I
a T.• .•1••1.1 J_ i( R 1
LLLJAL:fb f t b j' ,_
1iL T
1 .
4
of ,• "• y. I T^; -..
R-3t
y i -
Y
I
D . FREDERICK. R . ,.iBROWN
R=336-79 , SP-337-79 - --
APPL1GANT DRE LF:REDER'ICK R .BROWN TOTAL AREA +24 ,.000. sQ ft
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Kirkland Avenue NE '.
NG R-2 , Residence Two.' Family
EXISTING ZONI •
EXISTING USE
Und'evel oiled_
Dental `C1`ini,c./Prpfessional Bldg
1. PROPOSED USE
s Medium Density Multiple Fami ly
4 COMPREHENSIVE LAND 'USE PLAN
I
COMMENTS
t
1
f
Ji
I
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
QFinance Department ,
Fire Department
Library Department
0 Park Department
0, Police Department
0 Public Works Department
0 Building Div.
0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio
0 Traffic Engineering Div.
N„
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his
A
defigpee)
DAT E #9
PLEASE REVI, THIS APPLICATION FOR
APPLICANT : deati4/
LOCATION : • 11.11Itê
APPLICATION(S), : '
111‘ 4461/7 ”i'" 71
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX..6 #
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :0 // '"/
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
DCPATIL•iiiiu Ti L.-1 T
A porteue
0 I C•1 S‘,/10CfjL,12°°•."Chl e
0
IA•t(5-1 ki 04 Li6 A Nu) )6 0 1..,t.),)-rt;Pc 5,----eid,c4-7 et,.4iLl
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
r—rApproved 1Not A—p—proved /s2,ex e, AZ--
Comment or conditions : 61 '(-/LIC-7.1-7-3 • trY/e6.-//Y/M%/A...-V-• ///1--6_,) /1C cc
bit L.„5 c1' /
7 /, t--Jc S
7, ` •
it LA_
1/ (/7-7"
Signature of Director or Author,' zed Representative DC7e7/7
9.. r IN V 2 .3 1 "" ; b . • ..)1
r i :... ii J
17
s
or•s ro.r,- SCALE I ICiO1 /
It,4 \'aoi•f ...y,i' NH/0 fv I.Sh. R • !!Yr.
7. . . __ a.- - :•,.qrv- _ 1l 71.,] T,.. _
Ti
k. 11 k . •1'
A'' y 1
f11% '‘.6 (
1, . 1. ' .; • ,I v 0 4 ' ' i c .:. • I.i,9.,.\."...•4 ., ..': , ; $ .4, • ' .
i '
s I '--
M/:. C'41t: t
Ii4c.rr' ' -- ;I ki ids•''- y,r
a., • /
MA
r
a '
y
S S F
1111:::'14:
n/`' W 1—:'
M,11.'i
t ®
f
J } A L4 ` L. •
rv};- -
F ; ).' ,1,,
F WAn 'a.,;
9ri"/ '
T ^
0"', .,i i4.. A1OS ,. a. i q 6.. .
1 Y i'L U 1 nn w •
a •— - A:I.'', •
1• .
Y3 YF. I,
i,,,,,,,,
d,' `
a cif' ; ! 'h
M 4.1
5
o
l
9' ,,
l/'. •
ry P ®
v
4i'221._Yt M1 . 1 1
44 s rye IY 1 Tin I. .#
pi
mo
I l,r
Id
I, y
1' ..
14.i -. '
I • .. ?.- ' 1- ''-.) I '•
i.;,:
bi, 1 .'„t 1 •., , • .'v'--` .
I.„.,. '
f t I
fG,.,
i1
if I,,
jj ' J.:, . i,• : .'- 1 , ' .L.'
ft': - . • • t' fje , ... • . • 1.. • . i . .../.° .
r,i
I45 s .
o
1,.1
1
0
S! 1,J
1../ . , " . ' ''.4,', , • : .
1..i . '
a IDry ,un''6f S.
e,
r
r '7 A .'I. f' I •.
f'it
I
Ul
1 I I': cr, ,-I
4
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: 0 Finance Department
0 Fire Department
40 Library Department
10 Park Department
40 Police Department
2) Public Works Department
Building Div.
Engineering Div.
0 Traffic Engineering Div .
4tY : 1 0 Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee
r
0
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- A plication No . :
Action Name : eij0.
4.
Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) :
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
gr, NOM. i.t(Ftc"
117:
5/3/71
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :,
Department :
SIGNIFICANT 1-"NON
Comments :
r-
i-A7
Signature of Director or Authbrized( epresentative Date
f
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: 0 Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department ,
Police Department
Public Works Department
J Building Div.
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS
Department : /..:----i, y/Heeokt--/
E3 Approved OD Not Appiroved
Comments or conditions :
742 re Z co pt C.',,
1
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
pr,Approved ED Not Approved '
omftents or conditions :
Z
e,(Signatu), , of Director or Authorized Representative
2,_ --?
Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS:
D partment : -' ,,7;.,
Approyed- - 0 Not Approved
Co ents or cdnd.-
2 ci ,-- e2-,-A , J...,
r
c:),7 ?C c 21,
e 7- (4)1,- ' i'-•c P‘..'e-• 7-eir
t-0,1-,..,:-' L,
6,, 1; ,-,),_„ /,
r, 7 ,, :,..,
7 s./2,,,,,,,,o,
i
i) /cy 7 2 „ 7 L._:,, „/,/,,. ,p1 ,P--,,/, .//
Signature of Director. or Authorized Representative Date
PROPOSED/FINA DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANT NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No .R-336-79 ; SP-337-79 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-456-79 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Applicant seeks rezome from R-2 to R-3 to allow
construction of a professional building (dental clinic )
Proponent DR. FREDERICK R. BROWN
Location of Proposal SEcorner of NE llth Place and Kirkland Avenue NE
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT' '
This proposal has been determined to ® have not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is
pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
non
Reasons for declaration of environmental/ significance :
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent• or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/ final )
declaration of non-significance :
Responsible Official GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
Title PLAN I . G:D9-ECT! ' Date MAY 16 , 1979
r
Signature ut,• A r,.+-- ., -4:
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
J •
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHE .7,Y.IST FORMS
TO : O Finance Department
Fire Department
Library . Department
Park Department . ;
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 6 z z- i.e..Le'c'F'/ r _
SIGNIFICANT / ' ' NON. SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
z. 4 f
4Z)/;%, 4-)--— Er. — 7
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :122--7id;
SIGNIFICANT lam! NON SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Signature- of Director or A'u' horized Representative Date
i
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :_____ __________ /sZ /7-7 c L;e( G l/1..' E'C=yk i av 6
SIGNIFICANT k' NO.N SIGNIFICANT
Comments :
Z--c"-------)._-,1_ -6-":"__,. ;5:7 ---"-- --- -e/-st-L----,...___J a://7"
Signature of Director -Ur- Authorized Representative Date
y
R-336-79 Page Two
SP-337-79
Dr. Brown referenced Section L.2 (Planning Department Analysis - Special Permit) , and
clarified that the square footage of the proposed building will contain more than 3270
square feet of office space as denoted in the report due to utilization of most of the
basement for current and proposed office use, and only a limited amount of space will
be utilized for storage of dental equipment. Regarding the proposal for restricted one-
way circulation within the parking area, Dr. Brown advised that in the clinic's current
location directly across the street from the proposal, it has been observed that patrons
disregard one-way signing and travel through the parking area in both directions. He
advised his desire to provide as much parking space as possible to accommodate customers
as well as transit users to utilize the parking lot. Dr. Brown objected to screening
recommendations since the proposed building will be an attractive addition to the area,
and height of the structure will be limited. Regarding existing R-1 zoned property
located east of the subject site, he indicated his intent to utilize the area for parking
provisions and picnic tables, for convenience of employees of the clinic, and noted that
the entire residential lot, of which the R-1 portion of the rezone is a part, is owned
by the applicant. He requested that the city allow provision of the 10-foot landscape
screen on the existing R-1 property, and indicated his intent to maintain 7200 square
feet as required by the zoning code within the lot area.
The Examiner inquired regarding the elevation of the proposed structure. Mr. Brown
advised that the roof of the building will be flat and equipment will be located elsewhere
within the facility and not on the roof. Mr. Clemens indicated the height of the south
elevation of 14 feet and 22 feet on the north elevation from parking lot level to the
top of the roof. Dr. Brown advised that the elevation of the site is lower than existing
residential lots located east of the site, fencing on certain portions currently exists,
and the development would not visually impact the surrounding area. He indicated his
opinion that provision of recommended setbacks and landscaping would severely limit
the development of the site.
The Examiner inquired if the rezone proposal for the R-1 property would be scaled down
to comply with the 7200 square footage requirement. Dr. Brown advised that plans
designating the required square footage had been submitted, but the city would not approve
them. The Examiner inquired if the applicant had any objection to improving the existing
substandard water main. Dr. Brown indicated his concurrence in the requirement.
Referencing Section L.2 of the Planning Department Analysis contained in Exhibit #1
which pertains to substandard design of the proposed staff area, the Examiner requested
a recommendation for resolution from Mr. Clemens. Mr. Clemens advised that any spaces
in excess of the required number could be designed in any manner satisfactory to the
applicant to supplement the required parking area. The Examiner requested clarification
of the parking requirement in relationship to the square footage of the office space
contained within the clinic. Mr. Clemens and Dr. Brown reviewed the parking requirement
if all useable space totaling 5,000 square feet in the building is eventually converted
to office use and advised that the proposed 27 parking spaces would exceed the requirement.
The Examiner inquired regarding the practical effects of a one-way versus two-way
circulation pattern. Mr. Clemens advised that the recommended 10-foot landscape area
on the northeastern portion of the property would limit the maximum driveway width to
18 feet which would be too narrow to allow a two-way traffic circulation pattern through
the site. Dr. Brown questioned the necessity of the 10-foot landscape screen in lieu
of five feet required by the zoning code. Mr. Clemens advised that a separation of uses
is necessary to protect existing residents from potential noise and air pollution resulting
from clinic traffic on the subject site, and in the past the Examiner has required as much
as a 50-foot buffer for the purpose of separation of land uses.
The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. There was no response.
He then requested testimony in opposition. Responding was:
William C. Sharpsteen
1075 Lynnwood Avenue N.E.
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Sharpsteen indicated that although he does not oppose the rezone from R-2 to R-3 of
the future site of the proposed clinic, he objected to rezone of a portion of an existing
single family lot for the purpose of parking since his residence abuts the site and
creation of negative visual and noise impact from the rear of his property would occur as
well as depreciation of the value of his home.
Responding was:
Roy White
1081 Lynnwood Avenue N.E.
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. White also indicated support of the proposed development but objected to creation of
a parking lot in close proximity to his residence. He advised that because his home _.
May 31, 1979
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL.
APPLICANT: Dr. Frederick R. Brown FILE NO. R-336-79,
SP-337-79
LOCATION: Southeast corner of N.E. 11th• Place and Kirkland Avenue N.E.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval for rezone of two parcels totaling
24,000 square feet at the intersection of Kirkland Avenue N.E.
and N.E. llth Place from R-2 to R-3 to allow construction of
a dental clinic. Also proposed is a rezone to R-3 of 4,000
square feet of an .11,000 square foot R-1 zoned and developed
single family parcel adjacent to the rear of the primary
rezone area.
SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval of the rezone from R-2 to R-3
RECOMMENDATION: only, subject to conditions; approval of
Special Permit.
Hearing Examiner:Denial.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary. report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on May 17, 1979.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on May 22, 1979 at 9:40 a.m. ,in the Council Chambers of the Renton
Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had• received and reviewed the
Planning Department report; and the report .was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
David Clemens, Senior Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional
exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map designating
surrounding zoning
Exhibit #3: Site Plan as submitted
Exhibit #4: Floor Plan (2 sheets)
Exhibit #5: Site Plan with staff comments .
Mr. Clemens referenced Exhibit #5 which designates the Planning Department recommendation
for provision of a one-way circulation pattern within the parking lot to expedite. traffic
flow and alleviate congestion. The Examiner inquired 'if the designated pattern could be
reversed or if the. department specifically recommended the ingress from Kirkland Avenue
N.E. Mr. Clemens advised that the department had .no objection to reversal of the one
way pattern. The Examiner inquired if the department had a recommendation for screening
the R-3 residential property from the proposed clinic. Mr. Clemens advised that a high
retaining wall and a six-foot wood fence currently exist on the R-3 property to the south,
and along with landscape screening as part of. actual site development would more than
adequately serve .to separate the land uses. . Responding to. the Examiner's inquiry regarding
the use .of property.to the' north of the site, Mr. Clemens indicated that the parcel is
currently vacant. . The Examiner inquired if the. Public Works Department recommended an LID
for improvement'of the substandard water main on N.E. llth Street. Mr. Clemens indicated
that to allow •site development, the applicant will be required to upgrade water lines and
fire.flows for fire protection which can be accomplished through the city by various methods.
The Examiner requested testimony by .the applicant. Responding was:
Dr. Frederick R. Brown
1126 Kirkland Avenue N.E.
Renton, WA 98055
R-336-79 Page Four
SP-337-79
12. There is a moderate rise in the subject property from east to west. A sharper slope
is encountered from the south to the north with approximately an eight to ten foot
difference across the site.
Scrub grass predominates on the site with a few deciduous trees along Kirkland Avenue
N.E.
13. If rezoned, that portion of the proposed rezone which is now R-1 would be surrounded
on three sides (north, east and west) by R-1 properties developed with well-maintained
single family homes.
This small segment of the proposed rezone would be used for parking by the staff of
the proposed dental clinic. This parking area would be located adjacent to the rear
yards of these three single family homes.
14. The Planning Department report indicates that the area is generally in a transition
from single family to multifamily uses. They also note that any transition has been
quite slow and that the single family uses along Lynnwood Avenue N.E. are well
maintained. They indicate that these homes should be the object of protection per
the Comprehensive Plan's Objective No. 4 which states "Property values should be
protected within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners,
through effective control of land use. . ."
The Planning Department recommends that the reclassification of the R-1 portion be
denied as inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and incompatible with both
surrounding zoning and uses.
15. . The applicant proposed to construct a professional office building (dental clinic) on
the subject property pursuant to the procedures for a Special Permit (Section 4-722.B) .
The building is to be one and one-half stories with a daylight basement. The proposed
structure would be 22 feet in height. The applicant intends to provide 27 parking
spaces which would be adequate even if the applicant developed the maximum permissible
floor space.
The Planning Department recommended the parking facility be landscaped with.a 10-foot
wide buffer along the eastern property line (between the clinic and the single family
homes) . The department also indicated that a one-way traffic pattern be established
for the parking area in order to provide adequate maneuvering space in the narrow
eastern portion of the lot. They also want final approval of a detailed landscaping
plan for the site.
16. The Public Works Department indicated that the water main which serves the. property is
inadequate and would have to be improved per code requirements and that standard fees
would apply. The Fire Department noted that both access and fire hydrants must be
available prior to building construction.
17. The applicant in his letter indicating the circumstances which justify granting the
rezone notes that at one time the R-2 designation allowed the dental clinic; that both
the lots north and south have been rezoned and are either developed with multi-family
apartments or are to be so developed; and that other development has occurred creating
a need for the proposed clinic.
CONCLUSIONS:
Rezone)
1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate facts which indicate that the rezone meets
at least one of three criteria of Section 4-3014 which provides in part that:
a. The site has not been considered in a previous area wide rezone;
b. The subject site is potentially zoned for the new classification per the
Comprehensive Plan; or
c. There have been demonstrated changes in the area since the last rezoning action.
While it must be 'conceded that the applicant has demonstrated that some or all of these
criteria have been met, the rezone and the special permit for which the applicant has
also applied are integrally tied together and this indicates that the rezone should
not be granted.
R-336-79 Page Three
SP-337-79
contains three stories, visual impact from the top story would be detrimental, and he
stated that a transitional use should exist between single family residential zoning
and the proposed R-.3 property to prevent spot zoning..
The Examiner requested further testimony in opposition to the request. There was no
response. He' then requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department
representative. Mr. Clemens indicated an addition to the Planning Department recommendation
to require approval of the rezone request prior to completion and approval of the special
permit application.
The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No.
R-336-79 and SP-337-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:20 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION/DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter,
the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is, for approval of a reclassification of two, adjacent parcels of property
see' attached map) from R-2 to R-3 (designated 'A' on map) and from R-l .to• R-3
designated 'B' on map) , respectively. The R-2 portion of the property is approximately
20,000 square feet and the R-1 parcel is a 4,000 square foot portion of an 11,000 square
foot residential lot fronting on Lynnwood Avenue N.E. (5260 Lynnwood Avenue N.E.) .
Also. requested ,is approval of a Special Permit to establish a professional office
dental clinic) in a proposed R-3 zone.
2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions,
findings of fact, and departmental recommendations 'in this matter, and is hereby attached
as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has
been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. All existing ,utilities are available and in close proximity. The existing water main
will not adequately service the proposal.
6. The' proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height
requirements of Section 4-709A of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General
Ordinances.
7. The subject property is located' at the intersection of Kirkland Avenue N.E. and N.E.
11th Place. The property contains 24,000 square feet. The applicant •proposes
reclassifying a 4,000 square foot' portion of an R-1 lot to R-3 and 20,000 square feet
of R-2 property to R-3.
The original proposal would have created a non-conforming 7,000 square foot lot in
the R-1 zone. The applicant modified the proposal at the public hearing to leave the
required 7,200 square foot lot area in the R-1 zone.
8. ' The applicant also applied for a special permit in conjun'ctionwith the rezone petition
to allow the establishment of a dental clinic in the proposed R-3 District (Sections
4-709A.A(3) (b) & 4-722.B) .
9. Part of the original plat of the City of Renton, the subject site was rezoned from
R-1 to R-2 by Ordinance No. 1922, dated November 29, 1961..
10. The area in which the subject property is located has a mix of zoning types. It is
bounded on the northeast and south by R-3 zoning, the classification applied for in
this application. To 'the west along Lynnwood Avenue N.E. the property is zoned R-1.
Included'within. this R-1 district is the portion of the R-1 lot ('B' on map) which
the applicant proposes to reclassify R-3. West of the subject site along both Kirkland
and N.E. llth, the.properties are zoned B-1.
11. The Comprehensive Plan for the area in which the' subject'property is located suggests
that this property is suitable for medium density multi-family uses. The area across
the intersecting street (Kirkland and llth) which is presently zoned B-1 is designated
in the Comprehensive Plan as potentially suited for commercial purposes.
R-336-79 Page Five
SP-337-79
2. In order to recommend that a rezone be approved and that property be reclassified for
a new and more intensive use it must be demonstrated that the property is needed for
the new classification applied for. This is not the case. While the applicant desires
reclassification'to R-3, a residential use district with some minor exceptions, the
applicant intends to establish a dental clinic on the subject site. The proposed use
is more properly located in a B-1 zone. It is not as if the applicant were attempting
to establish 'a clinic in a large residential area in which no appropriately zoned
property was located. The subject area is zoned mainly R-2 (the R-1 portion of the
present application as indicated below is inappropriate for reclassification under
the present circumstances) . Nearby is land with the appropriate zoning. The only
justification to rezone to R-3, a residential district, would be to allow residential'
development, not the intrusion of a clinic, a business use, into a residential district.
3. The applicant for a reclassification should not be allowed to demonstrate that the
reclassification applied for meets the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, in this
case medium density multi-family residential, and then use the property to establish
a non-residential use. The uses confined to the east side of the Kirkland/llth
intersection are 'exclusively residential. There is an apartment building to the 'south,
and a proposed apartment building to the north. The western properties along Lynnwood
are exclusively single, family residential. The clinic with its drive-through parking
lot will generate a large number of daily uses of a driveway on the residential side
of the zone boundary. Even if well designed, .the proposed use of the property will
not make a good transition between. the R-1 zone to the west and the B-1 zone to the
east.
4. The proposed rezone of the small' R-1 property to the east to the R-3. reclassification
would create a totally imcompatible intrusion into the midst of the single family zones
along Lynnwood. Avenue N.E. The use of any portion of the single family lot for more
intensive use would violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan as noted in Finding
No. 14. The proposed use as a parking lot of this portion Of the subject property
located in the midst of rear yards of single family homes is therefore inappropriate,
even with the grade differences which exist.
5. The use proposed by the applicant provides an important service, but even so, it '
should be located in an area which is classified to accommodate the proposed' use.
Residential property should not be used for more intensive purposes unless circumstances
strongly evidence no other area is available per Conclusion No. 2 above. The desire
of the property owner to use his property for the proposed purpose is not enough.
The applicant has failed, therefore, to demonstrate a need for more R-3 zoning
especially for the proposed use. Apparently the only reason for the R=3 status is
not to establish medium density residential usage but to establish by special permit
a clinic on the site.
Special Permit)
Because the Examiner has recommended denial of the proposed rezone, a special permit
application is not available to establish a clinic in the R-2 district.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Examiner that the reclassification of the R-2 property and
the R-1 property to R-3 should be denied.
In the event that the City.Council should approve the application, it' is the recommendation
of the Examiner 'that the reclassification to R-3 be limited to that portion of ,the subject
property contained in th'e present R-2 zone and that reclassification of the R-1 portion to
R-3 be denied.
ORDERED THIS 31st day of May, 1979.
17:4
Fred J. K man
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day Of May, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of
record:
Dr. Frederick R. Brown, 1126 Kirkland Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055
William C. Sharpsteen, 1075 Lynnwood Avenue N.E. , Renton; WA , 98055
Roy White, 1081 Lynnwood Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055
R-336-79 Page six
SP-337-79
TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of May, 1979 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Joan Walker, Planning Commission Chairperson
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before June 14, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based On erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in
judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at
the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the
record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and
meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for
inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased
at cost in said department.
T
r.."L7 v V g 2 13
i
II.- 3'
L
0,, s9rtar-,•SC:
I
1LEIIGOL.G.'s-'------ -- ---1: I a sr
uRa'T r
V,
j}-- ., - 1 • .._,.fr' LP,.ay DNA '1-Mti ,7d.l)
L.
N lr'H• ,,.Ti o,
gE•. J
l AdL !
n 1 ,..__I ,,I 4st ,, s .•
trj.t•
V.Y•o py @ orC
4 i
J
pe
Iti. r
I-.. 0 ,i ,/1' c `
3
e
I;
14 •
yo j•1
w,1\-
I •
I' ,
r•.,;
4,„,,lv,4„...•
r q •,. .---
A:41 itiN I T
3
1 • 1
10.a
d
9 H I I r
F, h(, JrAit- 37 ffll.
Jeq
W ` ,i I , I ./
j
Y/
5, • r er5
1`t' U 4 1 1
7 f
co q j
L.
Cif,/
J, o•s 1 It'v ao 5Ptlso.:cJ \ .
4• t ax
0 ( IP 4
1114.
1 G 2J% J*LPF4'9so 1 J
1.f. I i
dre
i is • ! ' •I •
I A . ,I
s,
i
L 1•
7•-...ae- .1 1 /7:-• •
I !,It.Li
fo op son .
I Y
I
1.
yl o I L I
RECEIVED L/
1. /
1 n
CITY OF RENT0 1 s.•I r'i 1 I
HEARING EXAMINER ' Y. I + /
iii tHIIT;'NO ,•
MAY 221979 I
4.,.
4.
li
I 1T1
AM
1 p t 2 /l' ::51E; •
1PM '. :,
n I Iri +' ' 146./i' ' ' ' 'I{
7,R1311111IIII21 1 I• 1 t
i /I i
Plir•o
o )
yy J I I
Y A
I1.!
4
4.
s1 :.b
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 31st day of May 19 79 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
Subscribed and sworn this = day of uv\
19Z6\ .
Notary Public in and for the State-
of Washington, residing at Renton'
Application, Petition or Case: Dr. Frederick R. Brown; R-336-79, SP-337-79
The minute6 contain a tint o, the pa't ie4 og necond)
LAW OFFICES OF
HARROLD HANIS, COMBS& FIORI
Offices: RENTRN
RENTON
GEORGE FIORI,JR. MICHAEL M.HANIS Reply to: 405 SOUTH FOURTH
DAVID L.HARPOLD LOREN D.COMBS RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055
DAVID A.LITTLE TELEPHONE: (206) 228-1301
O
2 3 941 516
pt, UN 1979 t.,
June 14, 19790 RECEIVE
C CITY of RENTON 'tiCouncilmembers
OFFICE `Renton City Council
A.
LERf(S ti
Renton, WA 98055 r?
c
Dear Councilmembers :
On behalf of Dr. Frederick R. Brown, the decision of
the Land Use Hearing Examiner dated May 31, 1979 , and design-
ated File No. R-336-79 and SP-337-79 is hereby appealed.
The appellant is an aggrieved person pursuant to the Code of
the City of Renton, and appeals the Examiner' s decision upon
the basis of the following substantial errors in law or fact:
1. [Conclusion 1. ] The Examiner found that
all of the criteria for a rezone have
been met as to the property, but turned
it down, anyway, because it is tied to
a specific use - as a dental clinic' -
which use the Examiner later determined
will "provide an important service"
Conclusion 5) . It is error to turn
down an application because the applicant
has a specific project in mind, especially
a beneficial one.
2. [Conclusion 2. ] The Examiner finds that
t] he proposed use is more properly
located in a business zone. " The city
code §4-709A provides that clinics are
an appropriate use in R-3 if not "unduly
detrimental to surrounding property. "
The Examiner found no detriment to sur-
rounding property caused by the applicant' s
proposed use. To state a use, in general,
is more appropriate in one area than another
is error in law. The Code nowhere indicates
a clinic is more proper in a B-1 zone, but
provides for such a use in B-1 or R-3 ,
under the proper circumstances in either
case. The use is wholly consistant with
the zoning proposed.
2-
Councilmembers
Renton City Council
Renton, WA 98055
3. [Conclusion 2 . ] The Examiner states
The only' justification to rezone to
R-3, a residential district; , would be
to allow residential development, not
the intrusion of a clinic, a business
use, into . a: residential district.
This is error 'in law. . A rezone: may
be granted to accomodate any permitted
use, ' and clinics are a, permitted use.
It is error to conclude R-3 is strictly
a residential zone and ..then prohibit
all but residential uses. The .Code
allows several uses, depending upon
circumstances of- the ,property. A clinic
is just as consistant under the Code
with R-3 as is an apartment' building.
4 . [Conclusion `3. ] The Examiner concludes
that .an applicant " . . . should not be
allowed to demonstrate that the re
classification applied for meets, the
objectives of the Comprehensive Plan,
in this case medium density multifamily
residential, and then use the property
to establish a non-residential use. "
This is an error in law. The applicant
should be allowed to, and did demonstrate
his proposed use is consistant with
comprehensive planning for .the area. .
Residential use is only one of the use• s
consistant. with medium density residential.
The name 'given' to a planning classification
should not be allowed to govern the nature
and meaning of the classification. Clinics
are consistant with the designation of
Medium Density Residential. •
5. [Conclusion 3. ] "Even if well designed,
the proposed use of the property will not
make a good transition between the R-1
zone.;to the west and the B-1 zone to the
east. " This is factually in error. All
persons who are' resident in' the area agree
3-
Councilmembers
Renton City Council
Renton, WA 98055
that the proposed clinic use .will make
a better transition than uses that
are available under the current R-2
zoning. Their 'testimony was not con-
sidered by the Examiner because all
felt the project was 'so- meretorious
it would receive approval' without their
testimony.. A petition',will be provided
to the Council which it is requested
will be considered by the Council as a
report of persons interested pursuant
to Code §4-3016.
6 . [Conclusion .4. ] The Examiner' s decision
that the. R-1 to R-3 portion of the appli-
cation should be denied may have pre-
judiced or affected his decision regard-
ing the remainder of the application.
That specific zoning change was not in-
di_spensible to the project. It was added
at the suggestion of the planning staff.
The project can be completed, consistant
in all ways with City standards , without
that zoning change.
7. [Conclusion 4 ; Finding 14 . ] "Property
values should be protected within the
community for the benefit of its residents
and property owners , The Examiner' s
conclusion that this project will depress
property values is insupportable. All
property values in the area will either
be unaffected 'or .enhanced. .,
8. [Conclusion 5. ] "The use proposed by the
applicant provides an important service,
but even so, it should be located in an
area which is classified to accomodate
the proposed use. " It is error to conclude
an R-3 •classification is not defined to
include clinics. The Code clearly provides ,
for accomodation of clinics in R-3.
9 . The Examiner failed to : consider use of covenants
4-
Councilmembers
Renton City Council
Renton, WA 98055
to protect from uses permitted by R-3
zoning which may not be as compatible
with this area as a clinic (eg. large
apartment buildings) . The Examiner has
this authority pursuant to §4-3010 (B) l.
The applicant is prepared to appropriately
covenant the property as a condition of
rezoning.
10. The Examiner failed to consider the fact
that when this project was conceived it
was consistent with R-2 zoning. The
zoning ordinance subsequently changed,
but the nature of changes in the area
have been such as to make this clinic more,
rather than less appropriate. Consideration
should be given to the fact that this pro-
perty was rezoned to prohibit clinics (by
changing the definition of R-2) with no
showing that a change in the area had made
clinics an improper type of development.
It can be fairly said that the applicant' s
proposed use was prohibitted inadvertently.
On the basis of the foregoing, it is respectfully requested
that the City Council reverse the decision of the Land Use
Hearing Examiner.
HARPOLD, HANIS, COMBS & FIORI
Michael M. Hanis
Attorneys for Dr. Frederick Brown
MMH:ad
JITY OF RENT01 . NO 95 .3 '
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
6/
J
RENTON-, WASHINGTON' 98055 L . 19 Ica
RECEIVED OF \---\ (\_r \c\ \--;c0(\"\ 7-s
2-270 Occko
TOTAL f.2, 7),_6(.7) •
GWEN E. MARSHALLk, FINANCE DIRECTOR
BY
OF RA,A
A
4.
v di o THE CITY OF RENTON
z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
0
94TED SEPSE14
June 14, 1979
Members, Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
RE: File No. R-336-79, SP-337-79; Dr. Frederick R. Brown Request
for Rezone and Special Permit.
Dear Council Members:
Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation, dated May 31,
1979, regarding the referenced application. An appeal of the
recommendation was received on June 14, 1979 within the appeal
period established by ordinance, and is also attached for your
review.
The complete file regarding this matter will be transmitted to the
City Clerk this date, and will be placed on the Council agenda on
July 2, 1979.
If you require additional assistance or information regarding this
matter, please contact the office of the undersigned.
Sincerely,
i(6"11
Fred J. Kaufman
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
Attachments
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
7.
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
A = CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD
O,
p
O CITY CLERK
O
I I.,
SEPS -
June 15, 1979
APPEAL FILED BY MICHAEL M. HANIS, ATTORNEY, FOR DR. FREDRICK BROWN
RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated
May 31, 19.79; Dr. Fredrick Brown, Rezone R-336-79
and Special Permit SP-337-79
To Parties of Record:
Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the
public records office this date; along with the proper fee of $25.00,
pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code, as amended. The City Code requires
the appeal must be set forth in writing.
The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed
by the Council 's Planning and Development Committee. Please contact
the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee
meetings if so desired.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be
considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of
July 2, 1979 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor,
Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF RENTON
q 776 (
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk
DAM/st
cc: Mayor
Planning Dept.
Planning & Development Committee (3)
Public Works Director
Hearing Examiner
Finance Director
Ron Nelson, Building Div.
Iy
OF R
THE CITY OF RENTONtiJ
Q7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD
CITY CLERK
P47-FO
June 15 , 1979
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
COUNTY OF KING
DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton,
being first duly 'sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is
a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of
Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to not interested
in this matter.
That on the 15th day of June 1979, at the hour of
5 :00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United
States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by. first
class mail, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY
MICHAEL M. HANIS, ATTORNEY FOR DR. FREDRICK BROWN REGARDING
REZONE R-336-79 AND SPECIAL PERMIT SP-37-79 TO ALL PARTIES OF
RECORD.
y
Delores A. Mead, City- lerk
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 15th day of ,June, 1979.
Notary Pub1i,d 'i ri and . for
the State: of,•'Washington,
residing in Renton
sb
RENTON CITY COUNCIL.
Regular Meeting
July 2 , 1979 Municipal Building
Monday , 8: 00 P . M . Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
flag and called the Renton City. Council meeting to order.
ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President; CHARLES F. SHANE (Arrived
COUNCIL shortly) THOMAS W. TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, GEORGE J . PERRY, MARGARET
L. PROCTOR, RICHARD M. STREDICKE.
CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; LAWRENCE WARREN,
IN ATTENDANCE City Attorney; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; RICHARD
HOUGHTON, Public Works Department; BATTALION CHIEF MATTHEWS, Fire;
CAPT. JAMES PHELAN, Police Department; ROBERT HUFNAGLE, Park
Department; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant.
MINUTE APPROVAL Addition Page 4: "Councilman Stredicke inquired whether Student
6/25/79 Home Services, Bellevue, was licensed to operate within the
City. " Councilman Stredicke noted since that time he has been
advised the company has no permit; they have been advised of need.
MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PROCTOR, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES. OF
JUNE 25, 1979 AS AMENDED. CARRIED.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION Mayor Delaurenti presented Delores A. Mead, City Clerk, with
Policy and Procedure Special Award engraved placque from International institute, of
Manual - City Clerk- Municipal Clerks 33rd annual meeting in BalHarbour, Florida;
Outstanding First Place Award in cities over 25,000 for Policy and Procedure
Publication of Year Manual . Mrs. Mead accepted the congratulations with thanks, noting
need under the Public Disclosure law for public access to records
and index.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. SE, called attention to dance 7/21/79
Musicians Hall .
Senior Center Peggy Cummins, Municipal Arts Commission, requested letter from
Stained Glass Agenda. MOVED SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE, READ ITEM 9.a. CARRIED.
Window Letter from Peggy Cummins, Chairman 1% for Arts Committee, noted
Donated by offer of donation from Mr. and Mrs. Charles A. Ruud for funds
Mr. and Mrs.for a stained glass window for the new Senior Citizens' Center
Charles A. Ruud' . and explained the process by which a selection..was made. The
letter recommended the Council accept the donation with appreci-
ation to Mr. and Mrs. Ruud, concur in the jury's design selection
submitted by Hill Associates and authorize the Administration to
execute the necessary contract. The letter reported the Commission
was pleased with the response received from Northwest artists
throughout the competition and that the art piece will be enjoy-
able addition to the new Senior Center quiet lounge area on first
floor facing the river and courtyard, noting window contains
subtle shades and 50% minimun transparent glass. " MOVED BY TRIMM,
SECOND SHINPOCH, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMISSION;
CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke noted Charles Ruud as former owner
of the. Record Chronicle and present owner of the Record Stationery
and Office Supply..
Dr. Frederick Brown William Sharpsteen, 1075 Lynnwood Ave. NE, presented petition
Rezone R-336-79 and bearing signatures of 12 homeowners requesting reversal of the
Special Permit Hearing Examiner's decision of 5/31/79 and allow the building
SP 337-79 of a medical/dental building by Dr. Fred Brown on Kirkland Ave. NE
R-2 to R-3 and NE 11th P1 . as clinics are needed and would be best buffer
for Dental Clinic between residential and business areas. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND
and SHINPOCH, SUSPEND RULES AND ITEMS 9.d.c.and b. BE' TAKEN FROM AGENDA
Appeal by Dr. Brown FOR.READING. CARRIED.
Continued Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry: presented
report recommending that the Council reverse the decision of the
Hearing Examiner in part regarding Frederick Brown rezone R-336-79
and SP 337-79 and listed errors of fact and law regarding Con-
clusions No. 1 , 2, 3 and 5 and various matters regarding Special
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Special Meeting
July 2 , 1979 Municipal Building
Monday , 6 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers
MT NUTFS
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro tem Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance
to the flag and called the Special Meeting to order.
ROLL CALL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President; MARGARET PROCTOR, EARL
CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM. MOVED CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, ABSENT
COUNCILMEMBERS BE EXCUSED: Richard M. Stredicke, George J. Perry
and Charles F. Shane. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY OFFICIALS. DEL MEAD, City Clerk; SHARON GREEN, Personnel Director; MICHAEL
IN ATTENDANCE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant.
Executive Session The Council convened in Executive Session to discuss labor
negotiations with City' s Negotiator, William W. Treverton of
Conner, Gravrock, Treverton, Inc. of Bellevue. Time: 6:02 p.m.
Council reconvened in the Special Meeting. Roll Call : SHINPOCH,
PROCTOR, CLYMER, TRIMM. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, MEETING
ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 6:50 p.m.
4 a 4446Q.‘C
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk
Renton City Council
7/2/79 Page 2
Audience Comment - Continued
Dr. Brown Rezone Permit issuance and recommended that the Council find that the
and Appeal use proposed under special permit application will not be detri-
Continued mental to the adjacent properties or welfare of community. Further
the committee recommended that the Examiner's decision be affirmed
insofar as it denied the application for rezone of the R-1 property
to R-3 and that the remainder of the decision be reversed to read
as follows: The application for reclassification of the R-2
property to R-3 is granted. The application for Special Permit
to allow a professional office in, an R-3 zone is granted subject
to conditions (3) . MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN
COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Michael N. Read Hearing Examiner's decision. of 5/22/79 for denial of SP 338-79
Special Permit application to develop self-storage facility as an integrated office/
SP 338-79 retail business park (Renton Business Park) (B-1 zone) . A .
and request for reconsideration was filed with Examiner 5/30 and
Appeal denied 6/1/79. Appeal filed 6/13/79. Planning and Development
Committee having reviewed the matter, recommended Council reverse
the decision of the Examiner based on error of law Conclusion No.
6, 7 and. 8; and recommended that the Council find that the
proposed. use is a similar use to the specific uses allowed in
the B-1 zone and conclude that the proposed use is allowed as a
matter of right in the B-1 zone. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH,
CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. Councilman Stredicke inquired
of access from property onto NE 4th and requested report from.
the Administration regarding traffic in general area. Planning
Director noted no access proposed to either Union NE or Monore NE.
See later MOTION CARRIED, Councilman Stredicke voted NO. MOVED BY PERRY,
Ordinance SECOND CLYMER, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.. CARRIED.-
First City Equities Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry acknowledged
Rezone G to MP this being date set. for Hearing Examiner's decision regarding
R-328-79 Earlington First City Equities Rezone 328-79 to come before the Council ,
Industrial Park matter having been appealed 6/13/79 by Attorney Robert McBeth
and representing Ernie Lueckenotte- and Richard Haaland, operators
Appeal 6/13/79 of the Earlington Golf Course. Committee Chairman Perry noted
change in meeting date as applicant could not be present and
Continued announced 7/12 7:30 meeting; that the matter will be before the'
City Council 7/16/79 at the 8:00 p.m. meeting.
Audience: Doug Prichard requested Council acquire the property.
Condominium John Goff, 4300 NE Sunset Blvd. , Springtree Apartments, requested
Conversion information regarding condominium conversion ordinance. MOVED BY
PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, SUSPEND RULES AND PRESENT REPORT. Planning
and Development Committee report noted review of condominium con-
versions and recommended that an ordinance establishing a mora-
torium be referred to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY
SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEE.*
Persons present making inquiries: Caren Wharton, 24532 35th Ave. S.
Kent, South King County Tenants Union, asked matter not be tied
Ordinance #3326
up in committee with so many affected. *CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY,
90-Day Moratorium SECOND CLYMER, SUSPEND RULES AND PRESENT ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READ-
on Condominium ING. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented
Conversion to ordinance declaring a housing emergency and imposing a moratoriumOctober1 , 1979 on the conversion of rental units to condominiums and providing
Pending penalties. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO
Adoption of SECOND AND FINAL READINGS.* Persons present: Mike Poynter,
Regulations 16803 SE 254th, Kent, asked moving expenses be paid to tenants
Ordinance noting King County ordinance retroactive to cover expenses and
asked that assurance be given that apartment passes building and
fire codes. Councilwoman Shinpoch explained committee meetings
and desire for good ordinance. City Attorney Warren explained
an ordinance cannot be made retroactive. Dennis Whalen, 4308
NE Sunset; Bob Kresge, 4300 NE Sunset asked adoption of King
County ordinance. *MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance placed on second
and final readings declaring a housing emergency and imposing
a moratorium on the conversion of rental units to condominums
to October 1 , 1979. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT ORDINANCE.
ROLL CALL: 6-AYE: SHINPOCH, TRIMM, CLYMER, PERRY, PROCTOR AND
STREDICKE; ONE-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED SETTING MORATORIUM.
Renton City Council
7/2/79 Page 3
Recess MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Time:
9:30 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:50 p.m. Roll Call : All
Council Members. present.
Introduction Mayor Delaurenti introduced King County Councilwoman Patricia
Thorpe. Mrs. Thorpe explained King County condominium ordinance.
Further discussion ensued. Caren Wharton explained tenant rights.
OLD BUSINESS Councilman Perry inquired of legality and identification problems
for persons for persons using surnames only on election signs.
Councilman Stredicke asked removal of new cars parked on City
right-of-way in vicinity of Burnett Ave. proposed linear park.
Mayor Delaurenti advised corrective measures will be taken.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report
Committee Report , recommending second and final readings of the following ordinances:
Ordinance #3327 First readings ,6/25/79)
Street Vacation Ordinance read vacating a portion of California Ave. (VAC-4-79)
Portion of also known as N. 7th St. , as petitioned by Wong. MOVED BY CLYMER,
California Ave. SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
CARRIED.
Ordinance #3328 An ordinance was read appropriating $6,910 to be received from
Appropriation Burlington Northern Railroad for payment of road construction
Monster Road work on Monster Road. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE
Construction ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL.: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3329 An ordinance was read rezoning property from R-1 to R-3 located
Banchero Rezone at the southwest corner of NE 12th St. and Edmonds Ave. NE; Mike
R-234-78 Turner agent for Banchero and Florer. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND
SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. 'ROLL CALL: 6-AYES AND ONE-
NO: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested
confirmation of covenants and dedication of right-of-way, being
confirmed by the City Clerk.
Ordinance #3330 Ordinance was read rezoning property from G to R-4 located at
Schwartzenberger west side of Shattuck Ave. S. at intersection of S. 6th St.
Rezone R-339-79 MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL:
ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3331 An ordinance was read rezoning property from G to R-3 located
Nunn Rezone approximately 750 ft. south of NE 4th St. along Queen Ave. exten-
R-342-79 sion between Greenwood Cemetery on west and City property on east.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT AS READ. Councilman Stredicke
inquired re covenants and access, being advised by Engineer
Houghton that by consolidation of parcels the access is gained.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL
CALL: 6-AYE; ONE NO: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED.
First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the
following ordinances:.
Self Storage Ordinance read amending Title IV City Code to provide for use
Facilities of self-storage facilities to be allowed by Special Permit.
MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke noted
the ordinance was not retroactive.
Ordinance #3332 Ordinance read authorizing acquisition of property, and providing
Acquisition of for payment, authorizing the City Attorney to prepare condmenation
Cedar River Trail petition for acquisition for construction of Cedar River Trail
Properties system. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, SUSPEND RULES AND
ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED.
Following readings authorizing acquisition of Haddad/Jordan/LaRue
properties, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: SHINPOCH, TRIMM, CLYMER,
PROCTOR, STREDICKE; 2-NO: SHANE AND PERRY. MOTION CARRIED.
0'`'N
NA June 27, 1979
Renton City Council
Renton, Washington 98055
Dear Councilmembers:
We, the undersigned homeowners, have a 'common interest in a sub-
ject coming before the Council at the meeting of July 2, 1979,
We desire that a :denial clinic be built in'the lot at Kirkland
Avenue, N.E. and N.E. llth Place, and so, we feel that the
recommendation of the examiner to deny Dr. Frederick Brown's
request for permission to erect. a building and establish a clinic
at this site should' be reversed by the Council as a whole.
We feel that'a -smell';building',= with necessary parking area, will
serve the area best as a buffer between residential and business
areas. .And, dental/medical clinics are badly needed in this area.
If a large building, such as a three story apartment were built •
there, it would be an eyesore, and. lower the value of the residences
immediately involved.
Very truly yours,
cp.
7' 7 u 6-.
yix,:_ej.e.,..4) . .
i o c 4 7 • ,.
i
2d-sT , e-u,# raG /-17:12-11-41,VeY GP 29, ",
o g / 07 . Well/ 4„.0.E --21(?r.'
i air-itsz,... --._ z.f-?...,.. 6 ( Z .- ,
J1 , ace4 06( 77
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
JULY 2 , 1979
FREDRICK BROWN REZONE R-336-79 and SP-337-79
The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the
above-mentioned decision dated May 31, 1979 , and recommends that the
City Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner in part, based
upon the following errors of fact and law:
1. Conclusion No. 1 is in error in that the application for rezone
must be considered independently of a concurrent application for
a special permit for a particular use under the zoning code.
2. Conclusion No. 2 is in error in that there is no need for demon-
stration that the property is needed for the zoning classification
applied for.
3. Conclusion No. 2 is in error in that a rezone application must be
considered in light of the criteria of Section 4-3014 rather than
the use to which the property is proposed to be put.
4 . Conclusion Nos. 3 and 5 are in error in that the applicant may use
R-3 property for any use allowed by the zoning code, including
non-residential uses set forth therein.
5. The Hearing Examiner ' s conclusion regarding issuance of the Special
Permit is in error in that the applications for rezone and the
special permit must be considered independently. In view of the
Committee' s following recommendation to reverse the Hearing Examiner ' s
decision and to grant the rezone to R-3 , the application for special
permit must be considered.
The Committee further recommends that the City Council find, based upon
the record before the Hearing Examiner, that the use proposed under the
special permit application will not be unduly detrimental to adjacent
and surrounding properties, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community.
The Committee further recommends that the Hearing Examiner ' s decision
be affirmed insofar as it denied the application for rezone of the R-1
property to R-3, and that the remainder of the decision be reversed
to read as follows:
The application for reclassification of the R-2 property
to R-3 is granted.
The application for special permit to allow a professional
office in an R-3 zone pursuant to Section 4-709A (A) (3) (a)
is granted subject to the following conditions:
d
Planning and Development Committee
Committee Report
July 2, 1979
Page 2
1) Review and approval by Planning Department of
landscaping and sight screens, including a
minimum ten foot sight-obscuring screen
separating the staff parking area from the
R-1 single family property to the east.
2) Final Public Works Department approval of
plans for public improvements per appropriate
codes and ordinances .
3) Provision for fire protection per Fire Department
requirements.
G ge Perry, Chairman
cnRzas nwr o0(.Qv
Barbara Shinpoch
C.
r lymer :
e - 336 -79
Renton City Council
7/9/79 Page 3
Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued
First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the
following two ordinances:
An ordinance was read rezoning property located at southeast
corner of NE llth Place and Kirkland Ave. NE from R-2 to
R-3, known as the Brown Rezone R-336-79. MOVED BY CLYMER,
SECOND STREDICKE, REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR
TWO WEEKS. CARRIED.
First Reading An ordinance was read rezoning property located at the southwest
corner of SW 13th St. and Seneca Ave. SE from G-6000 to Light
Industry.L-1 , known as the Pre-Cut International of Washington
Rezone R-344-79 (Restrictive Covenants recorded. ) MOVED CLYMER,
SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM-
MITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED.
VOUCHER APPROVAL The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers
23907 through #24058 in the amount of $375;370.88 having
received departmental certification that merchandise and/or
services have been received or rendered; also included LID #302
Revenue Warrant R-39 in amount of $210,065.90 and Cash Warrants
C-88 $193,024.36; C-89 $9,814.53; C-90 $4,873.70; C-91 $31 .62
C-92 $1 ,562.28; C-93 $729.37; C-94 $30.04. MOVED BY SHANE,
SECOND TRIMM, APPROVE VOUCHERS AS RECOMMENDED. CARRIED.
CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows
items included:
Claim for Damages A Claim for Damages was filed by Mary D. Guinn, 3401 NE 12th
St. , in amount of $182.70, alleging City truck backed into
fence located at her home. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance
Carrier.
Claim for Damages A Claim for Damages was filed by Janis L. Barnhart, Box 895,
alleging fall at Liberty Park resulted in broken ankle.' Refer
to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier.
Surplus Equipment Letter from Finance Director Gwen Marshall announced a Public
Auction of surplus property on 7/28/79 at 10:00 a.m. at the
City Shops located 1st N. and N.Williams: list of equipment
available at Finance Dept. Equipment to be sold AS IS. The letter
requested referral to the Ways and Means Committee for resolution
to surplus.. Council concur.
Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED.
Approved
CORRESPONSENCE
Board of Ethics Letter from Susan Ringwood, President, Renton School Board
Appointment replied to letter of 6/26 from the Mayor reporting Mr. W. Johnson
Representing was not appointed to the Renton Board of Ethics by the Council
School Board because he is a declared candidate for County Council . The'
letter asked guidance to the Board in their attempt to nominate
at the next Board meeting to fill vacancy left by Dr. Hoffman. The
letter noted City Ordinance #3180. creating the Ethics Board
does not appear to deny membership to potential candidates nomi-
nated by the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce, the Renton
clergy, the League of Women Voters of King County South, the
King County Labor Council or the Renton School Board. The
letter noted other school board members may become candidates
for political offices and asked what impact this would have on
names which may be submitted to the Mayor for consideration.
Next School Board meeting 7/12/79; reply asked by that date.
MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND STREDICKE, THE APPOINTMENT NOT BE
MADE (VACANCY NOT FILLED) UNTIL AFTER NOVEMBER ELECTION. CARRIED.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, THE CODE OF ETHICS ORDINANCE
BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO REVIEW MEMBERSHIP
OF THE ETHICS BOARD. CARRIED.
Renton City Council
7/9/79 Page 4
Correspondence - Continued
Short-Term Letter from Steve Bakko, President, Renton Merchant Association
Peddler Licenses requested revision of the City Code regarding short-term peddlers
licenses (Chapter 25, Title 5) and denial of such licenses and
permits in the future. The letter also asked the Police Depart-
ment be instructed to enforcethe prohibition and to penalize
offenders. The letter stated the reasons that the short-term
licenses were objectionable. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER,
REFER MATTER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
TO REVIEW AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY
TRIMM, SECOND PERRY, refer to the Ways and Means Committee. ROLL
CALL: 3-AYE: SHANE, TRIMM, PERRY; 3-NO: SHINPOCH, CLYMER, STREDICKE;
MAYOR VOTED NO. MOTION FAILED to refer to the Ways and Means
Committee. ROLL CALL ON ORIGINAL MOTION: 4-AYES: SHINPOCH,
CLYMER, PERRY, STREDICKE; 2-NO: SHANE AND TRIMM. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Perry discussed information learned at Planning
Association meeting in Yakima and newsletter items including
ordinance passed by Snohomish County and Issaquah for assessment
on every home or apartment constructed. City Attorney Warren
advised he had obtained the ordinance from. Issaquah, noting
fee was business and occuptation tax on construction.
MEETING CONTINUED MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONTINUE MEETING
10:25 p.m.TO 7:00 PM JULY 16, 1979. CARRIED.
oadeitz,va . 7i &td
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 3 3 3 7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RES-
IDENCE DISTRICT (R-2) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) R-336-79/BROWN
WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance
No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as
amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property
hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-2); and
WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property
has been filed with the Planning Department on or about April 16, 1979, which petition
was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing,
and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 22, 1979, and said
matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request
having been denied and the matter having been appealed to the City Council of the
City of Renton and said City Council having reversed the Hearing Examiner's Decision
and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as
amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto,
and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto,
NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is
hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow specified: the Planning
Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance,
as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit:
Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Graceland Terrace, as recorded in
King County. Plats Volume 60, Page 64.
Said, property being located at Southeast corner of N.E.
11th Place and Kirkland Avenue N.E.)
SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be,effective upon its passage, approval
and five days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, this 2 3rlday of July, 1979.
Delores A.19teaa, city •C1Qrk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 234day of July, 1979.
Charles J. elaurenti, Mayor
Approved as to forms
Lawrence J. War City Attorney
Date of Publication: July 27, 1979
7; li'.."••••t••,,,', •••q 1:'if/...., _
a.
1
1:
I ,':.
t:.0.4:" •'1
i ':1, ' . ' ..
i1....,,,,;:..i.,. ..
i,. ,.:. ... Alj' ....,,
iii
4` ..
q ,Velli ..
1;
J is'; I
C 1, R:R,f.!'.
It
i Not`''R
1
f. ,„ ' t 11.0.
111.
t* ...
O.•••37 ge.... ifiii,I.
0 I .
v tZ, r 1 4t"` ,ra p
ito
t' r `
F
j 3_A i.
a ' it .
r
r,
1
7
r
I1 I7 .
1 . `
1
I'
4• re 3 l
I I• ... 1,
i .
1;•
1 .
r.,. I
l
R a;
1 t ,,
i',.,
ift!j ,, , ir J i1
i /.• : 1 I:si 1 i1 i 'I •T.
OF R4,
36- 27
o THE CITY OF RENTON
Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
ma CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD
0o co• CITY CLERK
o91,
SEP,
t,t0
July 27, 1979 °
Dr. Fred R. Brown
1126 Kirkland Ave. N. E.
Renton, Wa. 98055
Dear 'Dr. Brown,
RE: Rezone 336-79
The Renton City Council, during its regular
meeting on Monday, July 23, 19 /9
has adopted Ordinance No. 3337.
A copy is enclosed for your information.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF RENTON
Delores A. Mead; C.M.C.
City Clerk
DAM:j.eb/db
Enclosure
n' 4,4n. ,'' 4. c•.:;;
CITY OF Fier 'vr'
ciG. ®x :;' 4)
ORE JCE'NO;,333- •r"; ,
AN. UH INAANCE 'O '
THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON 23t;-?9CHANGINGTHEZON-t
ING CLASSIFICATION
OF CERTAIN PROPER-
TIES WITHIN THE CITY
Affidavit of .Publication I OF RENTON FROM RE-
i SIDENCE DISTRICT(R-
2)TO RESIDENCE DIS-
TRICT (R-3) R-336-
STATE OF WASHINGTON I 79/BROWN
COUNTY OF KING SS.
terWHEREAST tle
under Cha
ng Chap-
i lations) of Ordinance No.
y 1628 known as the"Code of
i General Ordinances of the
being first duly sworn on I City of Renton",as amend-
ed, and the maps and re-
ports adopted in conjunction '
oath,deposes and says that ,,,is the j ...
of i therewith, the property
I‘HE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE,a newspaper published four(4) I hereinbelow described has
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and heretofore been zoned as
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred [Residence District (R-2);
to,printed and published in the English language continually as a news- and
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, WHEREAS proper peti-
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained j tion for change of zone
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton , classification of said proper-
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the ty has been filed with the
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, ' Planning Department on or
about April 16, 1979,which
petition was duly referred to
Washington.That the annexed is a i%r" ' 0"' `•(-',--• ,. ,, C the Hearing Examiner for
investigation, study and 1.
public hearing,and a public Public Notices
j hearing having been held PASSED BY THE CITY
thereon on or about May 22, COUNCIL, this 23rd day of
as it was published in regular issues(and 1979, and said matter hay- July, 1979.
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period ing been duly considered by Delores A. Mead,
the Hearing Examiner and City Clerk
said zoning request having APPROVED BY THE
i been denied and the matter MAYOR this 23rd day of
of i consecutive issues,commencing on the having been appealed to the July, 1979. City Council of the City of Charles J.Delaurenti,
Renton and said City Coun-Mayor
day of (.I ?•. '"19 /' ...,and ending the cil having reversed the Hear- Approved as to form:
ing Examiner's Decision and Lawrence J.Warren,
said zoning request being in 1City Attorney
conformity with the City's Published in the Daily Re-day of - 19 ,both dates , Comprehensive Plan, as cord Chronicle July 27,inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- amended, and the City
1
1979. R5704scribersduringallofsaidperiod. That the full amount of the fee Council having duly consi- 1_
dered all matters relevant I
i thereto, and all parties hay-charged for the foregoing publication is•the sum of $.-::.e(:;,which
ing been heard appearing inhasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundredwordsforthe
support thereof or in o osi-first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent
lion thereto,.NOW THERE-
J!
insertion. FORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO OR-
J.i';r 1 s'' .;2.r,a S DAIN AS FOLLOWS:,
l rSECTIONI:The following
described property in the U_n30CityofRentonishereby6..
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , rezoned to Residence Dis- I N,.
1 trict (R-3) as hereinbelow?o cc
specified: the Planning Di- ' ® — u
19 I rector is hereby.authorized
IA
J
and directed to change the' 1 :1 y C,?
maps of the Zoning Ordi-
nance, as amended,to evi-!
Notary
I'-
in and for a State of Wash' gton, dense said rezoning,to-wit: I
residing at Kent,King ounty. Lots 3 and 4, Block 2,
Grassland Terrace, as f ' 1111
recorded in King County Thr
Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June is Volume 60, Page C,7
64.9th, 1955.
Said property being lo-—
Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words-and-figures,— cated at Southeast corn-
adopted by the newspapers of the State.er of N.E.11 th Place and
Kirkland Avenue N.E.)
SECTION II: This Ordi- __ -
nance shall be effective up-
on its passage,approval and
I five days after its publica-
ti_ _on.
V.P.C.Form No.87
OF R4,4A
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
maa CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0.
9A 235-2550
0
SEP1
M
Q
MEMORANDUM
July 9 , 1979
TO : Del Mead , City Clerk
FROM: Planning Department
RE : PROPOSED ORDINANCE - BROWN REZONE R-336-79
The proposed ordinance regarding the subject rezone
has been reviewed by this department and is considered
accurate. In addition , a legal description which has
been confirmed as correct by the Engineerong Division
is attached for inclusion along with a site map.
wr
Attachments
f,2, : g - -.:3--,Ji0- 77
Renton City Council
7/23/79 Page 3
Recess' MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED.
10:38 p.m. Mayor Delaurenti explained an early morning appoint-
ment, turned the meeting over to Council President Shinpoch and
Mayor Pro tem left the Chambers. The Council meeting reconvened at 10:47 p.m.
Shinpoch Roll : Council Members present as previously shown except Council-
manShane returned to the Chambers at 10:55 p.m.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ordinance Ways and Means Committee Member Perry requested public hearing
Regulating regarding conversion of apartment houses to condominiums. MOVED
Condo Conversions PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, SET HEARING AUGUST 13, 1979. CARRIED.
Ways and Means Ways and. Means Committee report recommended second and final
Committee Report readings for the following ordinances which had been on first
reading July 9, 1979:
Ordinance' #3337 An ordinance was read rezoning. property from R-2 to R-3 located
Brown Rezone at the SE corner of NE llth P1 . and Kirkland NE, known as the
Brown Rezone R-336-79. . MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND PROCTOR, ADOPT
THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYES: SHINPOCH, SHANE,
TRIMM, CLYMER, PERRY, PROCTOR, STREDICKE. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3338 An ordinance was read rezoning property from G to L-1 located
Pre-Cut at the southwest corner of SW 13th St. and Seneca SE, known
International as the Pre-cut International of Washington. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
CARRIED.
Ordinances The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances
First Reading for first reading:
Ordinance #3339 An ordinance was read confirming assessments for LID 284, sewers
LID 284 Final in area of Jones Ave. NE between NE 40th and NE 44th with 7 3/4
Jones Ave. NE per cent per annum interest. Robert A. and Clarissa M. Fawcett
Sewers protested. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, SUSPEND RULES AND
ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following read-
ing, MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT AS READ. ROLL CALL:
ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3340 An ordinance was read appropriating funds in amount of $4,500
Appropriation &from unanticipated revenue for payment of stained glass window
Transfer - Stained for the new Senior Center. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM,
Glass Window SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED.
Following readings, MOVED PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT AS READ.
ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3341 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Lakeview Ave. and
Street Vacation Renton Ave. between NE 4th St. and NE .5th Place as petitioned
Lakeview and by Wall and Redekop and Swartfager. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE,
Renton at NE 4th SUSPEND RULES AND PLACE FOR SECOND READING. CARRIED. Following
reading, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT AS READ.
ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3342 , An ordinance was read making it unlawful for any person in charge
Children in Vehicle of a vehicle to leave children under the age of eight years un-
Unattended attended or under age of twelve years if in a tavern or where
alcohol dispensed and requiring securing of vehicles. MOVED BY
PERRY, SECOND SHANE SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL
READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings, MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND
PROCTOR, ADOPT AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
The Committee recommended the following resolutions for reading
and adoption:
Resolution #2284 A resolution was read setting public hearing 8/20/79 re vacation
Alley Vacation of alley between N. 35th and N. 36th Streets, east of Burnett N.
N. 35th and 36th petitioned by Brown/Strand <a,nd. set public hearing 8/20/79. MOVED BY
VAC-.13-79) TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #3385 . A resolution was read supporting the. President's national plan
Energy Conservation and effort for energy conservation as beneficial to the citizens
of the United States. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Renton City Council
7/23/79 Page 4
Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee reported that the Finance and
Committee Report Utility Departments have provided them with estimates from 181
Utility Tax questionnaire responses which had been mailed to 310 utility
Referral of 6/18) customers. The report stated the average savings for low-income
elderly would amount o $41 .58 per year. This would result in
a reduction to the Current Fund revenue of approximately
12,000 per year. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER TO
ADMINISTRATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION PRIOR TO NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET.
CARRIED.
Board. of Ethics The Committee report recommended that the Board of Ethics ordinance
be referred to the Administration for review. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Voucher Approval The Ways and, Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers
No. 24064 through No. 24267 in the amount of $584,625.88 having
received departmental certification as to receipt of merchandise
and/or services. Approval also included. LID #302 Revenue Warrant
R-40 in amount of $70,774.34, plus Cash Warrant C-95 $64,447.74
C-96 $6,129.60, C-97 $197.00; plus LID #307 R-5 $1 ,613.29 C-6
1 ,713.29. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN REPORT.
CARRIED.
CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the
items included.
Fire Station Bid opening July 18, 1979 Landscaping for the Main Fire Station
Landscaping No. 11 located at Mill Ave. S. and S. 2nd St. ; seven bids
received. See attached tabulation. Refer to Public Safety
Committee.
Highway Annual certification from the State Department of Transportation
Certification regarding State Highway Routes including transferred routes,
limited access routes and certifications as, required by state
law. Refer to Public Works Department.,
Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND PERRY, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED.
Approval
CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Renton Police Officers Guild, James Foust, President,
Historic Building . presented a resolution declaring the building on Lots 18 and 19,
Declaration Block 9, Town of Renton, a "Historic Building" (located at 1025
South 3rd St. ) The letter told the history of the building which
Former. Puget Power was built in 1898. The Snoqualmie Falls Power Co. Sub-Station
and then Holmes No. 2 is the oldest brick building in Renton and served as a
Electric Building receiving and switching station for electricity from Snoqualmie
at Mill Ave. S. Falls, Washington's first hydroelectric plant. The letter .
and S. 3rd St. ) requested the declaration to establish historical value and to
allow restoration under the "Historic Buildings" Section of the -
Uniform Building Code. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL CON-
CUR AND REFER TO I4AYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. It was noted that
arrangements are being made by the Police Guild to rent the build-
ing to the Renton Area Youth Services. MOTION CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Shane requested the Mayor's Office advise what services
received from King County for tax monies received.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.
11 :25 p.m.
Delores A. Mead, C.M ..
City Clerk