Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA79-342CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON " ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM k A , RECDPD a; APR 24 1970 A,A. FOR 'OFFICE. USE ONLY 7 Application No. • CCC -/0- if r/ G DE "`P P Environmental Checklist No. ,eCf-4 ,2-7y PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: 1 QDeclaration of Significance Declaration:of Signif•icance 0 Declaration of NO-.Si'gnificanee ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971; Chapter 43..21C, RCW, 'Fequires all state and local governmental agencies to 'consider eh'vironmenta'1.°values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals, 'The Act •als'o requires •that .an EIS be . '• ' prepared for all major actions' izi,gnificantly affecting the quality of the. environment. • The. purpose of this checkl•jst is.. to help .the agencies involved determine whether or not a, proposal 'is such a major act•,ion. , Please answer the follow.ing' questions as cOmpl,ete'ly as you ca n•t•ith the information - presently. available to you. :Where explanations of your answers .are -required, .or. where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government •dec•ision. ma.kers, include your' explanation in the space provided, or use additional pag,@s ' i-f.,necessary. You should include. references to any reports or studies of' hich you a.re ,aware and which are rel•e vant to the answers you 'pr'ovi'de. Complete answers to,these questions now will help all agencies involved .with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- ' ' '''.. put unnecessary delay. The following questions apply t.6 y.our. total'proposal , not 'ju.st. to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers , - should include the impacts which will be caused, by your proposal when i't is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their .envir'onmental review now., with- Out duplicating paperwork in• t.he futur"e.. NOTE: This it 'a' standard formv'being used by. all state and local agencies in the State of 'Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . ' 1f,a' question, does not apply, just 'answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent • JOSEPHINE 0. .NUNN 2. Address-and phone number of Proponent: 251 Union Avenue, •Northeast • . . ' Renton, Wzf's'h-Yngton 98055. ak 4r 255-4292 t 3. hpate Checklist submitted April , 1979 4: Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: • Nunn Property 6. Nature and brief'descripti'on of the proposal ('in'cluding"but not'fiiiit•e'd to its' e•.. size, ,generai "des•ign elements, and other factors that will give an. accurate understanding of 'its scope and nature) : s C'nnC3 mi ni nm n 1 r o s r Arartmnnts° 3 3 Acres e y S , f' fib i 1 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The site is partially wooded, including evergreens, gently sloping to the west 'and has the possibility for a nice view. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Subject to rezoning'and project design. 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : City of Renton 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Possibly the Stone Property, 1.26 acres adjacent to this site. ParnPl' "B" 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Other properties nearby that are consistent with the master plan zoning for this area, are being planned or are under construction. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to .be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NZ c) Change in topography or ground surface relief X features? YES MAYBE fU d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE KU— e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? YET— MAYBE NO. f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify 'the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YET— MAYBE N Explanation: 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X' TES mum' au— b) The creation of objectionable odors? X T€s— MAYBE au— c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X' YES RAVTE F c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? x YES MAYS NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YET— MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X V MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria.. or other substances into the ground waters? YET— x M— Y BE PlO 1 ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NZl Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops . microflora and aquatic plants)? Y MAYBE b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora?X Tr" MAYBE N- c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area. or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? Y MAYBE 0— d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? TES AA P r Explanation: 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X YET— RAVE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MT` NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? v YES MAYBE N- d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or , X glare.' YES MAYBE W Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the X present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE iF Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X v-E MAYBE N Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YE- MAYBE 0— Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- butlOn, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Explanation: 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X 1 RXWE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? XX YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NU— c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? g YET— Ml T NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES— MAYBE e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES- MAYBE NU— M Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YE MAYBE NU— Explanation: Traffie generated' by an additional 60-70 nnifg whir.h are planned for this site. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE fa-- b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NU— c) Schools?X YES MAYBE N — d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MBE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES M YBE AO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE KU— Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? X YET— MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X vm MAYBE NB c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage?X Yam- MAYBE NB f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:Subject to the denisty and design and consistent with normal procedures. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in' the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YET- MAYBE 0— Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction .of any—scenic- vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical X site, structure, object or building? Y!s MAYBE NN Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above Anformation is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful ack of full isclosure on my part. Proponent: x gned) name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 79CITYOFRENTONEIVEDAPR7 RE7ONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LAND- USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. 1a'7 EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE $ /30,(((.G-O APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO . O GJA 1 CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE .5/1 54 9 ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name Josephine 0.. Nunn Phone 255-4292 Address 251 Union Avenue N..E. ,, Renton, WA 98055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Union Avenue N.E. between City of Renton property and Greenwood Cemetery 4 . Square . f_ootage or acreage of property 3.13 acres (136,531.39 . sf..) 5 . Legal description of property. -(if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Tax Lot #21lTaxAccount #162305-9021-06 : 0 The north 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 less the north 125 feet of Section 16, Township 23, Range 5, EWN,) subject to transmission line easemeiiit. . .etc.,, Records of King County, WA j2-- 0` S W /-/ 07" J L //=1 v"/Vof xr C- //- Z 3 5 , /c 6 . Existing Zoning "G" (Gen.. Class./ Zoning Requested "P_3" (Mn It_ PPR, _ ) NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. . Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific, requirements . ) - N- s form in duplicate. 0 E/1/ 7. Proposed use of site Condominiumscpr a.•artment units K °O 241919 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the sur\. ' ecb Landscaping of perimeters ; clustering of units toward' .i ntPri or Df property; varying heights of structures.. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Within six months . ' 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of. ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 AFFIDAVIT Josephine 0. Nunn being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this ,\\ day of 1979 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton SI -1\(\ • \\Ake Name of Notary Public) ignat,. re of Owner 251 Union Avenue N.E. Renton WA 98055 CAddress) Address) City) State) 255-4292 Telephone) FOR OFFICE 'USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that t ._-. oregoing application has been inspected by ,me and has been found to - t and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules/a , uli ns of the Renton Planning Department governing the fili •.f Etfp • - tion . 444 1919 Date Received pR 1, By: 9 N NG 1:EeP Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIM-INARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER , PUBLIC HEARING : JOSEPHINE 0': NUNN , File No : R-34249 MAY 22 , 1979 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : The, site contains a significant stand of Douglas Fir in the eastern 2/3"s of the pro,perty. with the remainder lawn grass . 4 . Wildlife: Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land U.se : The site is primarily undeveloped except for a single family residence in the southeast portion of the property . The Greenwood Cemetery is located to the. west and the Leisure ,.Estates Mobile Home Park to the south . Scattered single family residences are to the east and an apartment complex to the north . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERTISTICS : The area is in transition from scattered, single family uses and undeveloped land to multiple family and higher uses . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An existing 12" water main is located along NE 4th Street and a 16" :main extends south on Union Avenue SE for approximately 750' An 8" ' sanit'ary sewer-is situated on NE 4th Street and a similar pipe is located . on Union Avenue SE extending south for approximately 450 ' . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the : Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit Metro Transit Route`."#107 operates along Union Avenue SE within 4 mile of the subject site ; 4. Schools : The subject site is located approximately 2: mile south of the , Honeydew Elementary School and 14 miles southeast of McKnight Junior High. School and one mile southwest of Hazen Senior High School .;. 5. Recreation: ' Kiwanis Park is . approximately 2 mile north of the site and Windsor, Hills Park is within `.one, mile to the west. G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS' OF4H ZONING CODE: 1 . Section' 42709A, R-3 , Residence Multiple' Family. 2 .`;:-. Section 4-729 , "G" , Residence Single Family. H . APPLICABLE 'SELTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Comprehensive Plan ,-, 1965, Land Use Report Objective 6, page 18. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not have a direct impact. However , future, development of the site will disturb existing soils ,, increase storm water runoff, remove vegetation , a'nd have, an effect on traffic and noise. ,levels i n, .thp ,area . These impacts can be mitigated through proper 'development controls and procedures , how`ever. 2 . ' Population/Employment: The proposal would increase the population by apprb"ximately :a23.6 , persons ,(2 : 5 persons/unit;., times 99 units ) . RECEVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON HEARING :XAMINER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER mAy2 , 1979 PUBLIC HEARING AM PM 71819110111021 t213,41516 MAY 22 , 1979 APPLICANT: JOSEPHINE O. NUNN FILE NUMER: R-342-79 EXHIBIT NO / ITEM NO. k•- g1/2-- 7 " A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to R-3 for future development of either condominium or apartment units . (Site development map attached . ) B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: JOSEPHINE O. NUNN 2. Applicant: JOSEPHINE O . NUNN 3. Location :Approximately 750 ' south of 1 4th Vicinity map attached ) Street along the, Queen Avenu- extension between Greenwood Cemetery on the west and Cit of Renton property on the east . 4 Legal Description : A detailed regal description is available on file in the Renion Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: 3. 13 acres A. ippess : 30 ' Wide unimproved road extznding westerly from Union Avenue N : 7. Existing Zoning: G" , General Classification tistrict minimum lot size 40 ,000 squa e feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : G" , General Classification listrict B-1 , Business Use ; • "T" 'Trail : r Park ; R-3, Residence Multipl : Family , minimum lot size 5001 square feet , 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Greenbelt , 'CoMMercial , Mediu Densit Multiple Family 10. Notification : The applicant was notified i writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in thv Record Chronicle on May 11 , 979 and posted in three places on or near th site as required by City Ord nance o May 11 , 1979. C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2249 da ed June 22, 1966. The existing G zoning was applied upon annexatio . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography : The property rises from west to east at approxi ately a 5% grade . 2. Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very s ow in the substratum. Runoff is ,slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , ,erries , row crops and for urban development. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JOSEPHINE 0 . NUNN , Pi'1.e No : R,342.79 MAY 22, 1979 PAGE FOUR property north of the subject site , If they are to be provided from Union Avenue NE , they will have to be extended across City of Renton or other properties . 6. The Fire Department indicates that all hydrants and access shall be installed and serviceable prior to any building construction . Hydrants and watermains shall be installed per water engineering requirements and future structures shall meet " the 'aniform Fire Code for occupancy type . See other. comments . 7. The Utilities Engineering Division noters .that.'water and sewer plans will have to be approved and hookup fees will' be; assessed . See other comments . Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the apparent access difficulty that exists , R-.3 zoning may be approved only if appropriate direct public access is . assured. This can be accomplished by the applicant providing dedication and improvement of a public street with' 36 ' curb-to-curb w-idth . including: Curb ,.' gutter, `sidewalk , street paving , storm- dr-ainage', and street .lighting ' at a location to 'the 'approval :.of the Planning and Public Works Departments . Such rezone,,is further subject to the following conditions in the form of -restrictive covenants run- ning With the Land . 1 . Site development. approval . Specific site development, plans including site plan , landscape plan , building elevation _design , and parking ,and circulation shall be reviewed and approved by the ' Hearing .Examiner-, 2 . Existing evergreen trees shall be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site design , development and landscape plans . No such trees shall be cut or removed without approval of the Planning Department. Detailed landscape and open space plans shall be .approved; by the Planning Departm.ent., atfthe time of site development review. 3. All utilities shall be provided, per Public Works Department; approval comprehensive utility plan at the time of site, development: PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING E'X'AMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JOSEPHINE 0: ` NUNN , File No: ' R-,342-79 MAY 22, 1979 PAGE THREE 3, : Schools ; The proposed mu•:itiplefamily development would inc ease the school " population ': by approximately 23 students 25 student/unit) . These 'rnew pupils are likely to be scatt- red throughout the .,grades and not significantly impact existing . ervices 4. Social : If the rezone is granted , future devel,opment,wi11 ' provide increase opportunities for social interaction among the area residents . 5 . Traffic.:; The proposed use would increase traffic in the area by approximately 5.70trips per day based upon a maximum allowable density of 94_.---uni 'ts- 'in. the .R--3.. zone (6. 1 trips/.unit 'times 9, units ) . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C•, a negative declaration of environmental impact has, been prepared ' or rezone only, and subject to, further environmental review at the time of site development.. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City, of Renton, Building 'Divi`sio0 2 . City ;of; Renton' Engineering Division . 3: City •'of.; Renton Traffic Engineering Division , 4. City of Renton Utilities Division;: ; 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L. ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The ,proposed:,rezoneto R-3is . consistent with most of the l : nd use element of the Comprehensive Plan ,..except' for the greenbelt portion in the westerly section of the' site corresponding to the po erline right-o.f-way bisecting the site . 2.'. -The: proposal is generally consistent with existing ' zoning and land uses in the vicinity (i .e . R-3 , B-1 zone , newly const ucted apartment complex and existing business uses to the. north) , 3. .: The , Stone Property immediately adjacent to the north was r=zoned to R-3 by Ordinance #3247' of' September 22 , 1978 . The' •Wehr an property to the northwest and the Swanson property to the orth wer( rezoned to B- 1 at the same time . The Examiner' s conclusio s and recommendations are attached . , 4. Although the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map Element, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , Residential , Page 11 , states that "convenient access to major arterials and highways is important. " The purposes and objectives of the , comprehensive plan , streets and arterials also stat- s that street patterns compatible with and complimentary to the !eneral land use plan . . " should be considered . The only apparent access to the site is an unimproved 30-foot wide road exte ding westerly from Union Avenue NE. This would not. meet City o Renton requirements for direct public access .. The applicant has nit addressed this matter in the application . In R-165-78 the Examiner stressed in Conclusion #1 that "Adequate access to the site per applicable city requirements must be. provided . " In his recommendation , the Examiner made 'this one of his 'conditions of approval for the rezone. It would seem reasonable , th- refore, that this and the other conditions would be appropriate for the subject request given the . close:::prox'imi ty to and simi l ari oy of circumstances to the Stone rezone , 5. It is unclear as to how utilities will be provided to the site . If they are to be provided from NE 4th Street , they will ave to be extended the entire distance across the apartment complex 1. The proposal generally Forms to the Comprehensive Pla Section 4-3014. (B) ) except for access. Adeeuace access should be provided t ne site prior to development of the site. Perhaps the most appropriate and expeditious solution would be to incorporate this needed access into the development of adjacent properties. However, access becomes critical relative to actual development,' not the reclassification. Adequate access to the site per applicable city requirements must be provided. This can be reviewed during review by the Examiner of the development site plan. 2. The area immediately surrounding the property 'is undeveloped despite the B-1 zoning to the north. ' Low -density single family: zoning, (G) directly abuts the B-1 zone without benefit of buffer or. transition. Some transition or buffer is necessary between the two zones at the subject site. This would be the appropriate use of land use principles. . ." and the' ". . .coordinated development of undeveloped areas." (Summary, page 9, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, July, 1965) . Otherwise, potential multi-family and/or commercial development might be ". . .of incompatible uses which would. . .prevent the development of orderly growth patterns." Objective No. 1, page 17, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . . R-165-78 Page Three ' It was stated that the B-1 property north of and adjacent to. the site is proposd for development of 220+ multiple family dwelling units. The development plans were not submitted or .required, but Section 4-711 (B-1) and 4-709.B (R-4) allow a building height of.'six stories "or 95 feet. If such height is not in fact proposed, even the density above requires transition to the low density single family G property. iMedium density multi-family '(R-3) can. provide this transition if appropriate restrictions 'are placed upon the rezone. The R-3 conforms to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use .Map designation for the subject site. The property south of and abutting the site is. also, des'ignated .to possibly be R-3; however, until it is developed •beyond the existing single .family• use, it should be considered as single family (G) property. 3. The adjacent andeasterly. city-owned property (undeveloped). is compatible with R-3 zoning. Buffering is not required along this portion_of the subject site. Normally the R-3 zone rear yard setback is 20 feet and side' yard setback is five feet (Sections 4-709.A. , B.-, and D. ) :' This appears insufficient when the abutting property is G. ' The setback along the south and west portions .;of the site should therefore be .enlarged to 30 feet. Furthermore, the building height should be reduced from 60 feet to 35 feet, that height for single family ,development, in- order to complete the transition and buffering. Review of .the site plan by the Examiner in a public hearing is appropriate for final review of compliance with this and other conditions. 4. Existing vegetation,' Particularly the substantial trees, should be retained as much as possible to contribute. towards resolution of storm drainage problems. Drainage and vegetation retention can be reviewed with specific development plans. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the recommendation of the Examiner that- the City Council- approve the reclassification from G to R-3 subject to: I 1. Provision of adequate access to and from the property per applicable city ordinances and regulations. 2. Retention of existing vegetation as much as,. possible. 3. Building setbacks of 30: feet along the southerly and westerly boundaries of the property. 4. Building height of 35 feet. - • 5. Review of the development site.-plan by the' Examiner in a public hearing for compliance with the aforementioned conditions. ORDERED THIS 15th. day of:June, 1978. L. *ix' reeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 15th day of June, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties itx"'n'Jr; 11i:pilR'rMcN'r 1 11I NARY REPORT iu BEARING EXAMINER iL I C HEARING: STANLEY E. STONE, FILE NUMBER. R-lG5-78,: REZONE I' 'I' 30 , 1978 v i'i.GI: THREE sEd53Tflat ilej)---- L. ENVIRONMENTAL .ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Env ronmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, F 43.21C, a Declaration,:of-non-signific. ce has been issued for the subject proposal. This declaration is based on: provis on of suitable development procedures and standards. M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached. N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of. Renton Building- Department. 2 . City, of Renton Engineering Department. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Department. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City. of Renton Fire Department. 0. STAFF ANALYSIS:.. 1. The proposed rezone to R-3, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan ap element which designates: thesite and area south of the: site as medium density multiple `family residential . 2. The proposal is .generally consistent with existing zoning- and land use- to the north (i.e. , B-1 zone, proposed apartment complex, and existing busine•s uses). 3. -Although the proposal is consistent with the1Comprehensive Plan Map Element, the Comprehensive-:Plan.,Land; Use Report, Residential 9: page 11, states that convenient access to major ,arterials and highways is important". The' purposes an" objectives of the comprehensive plan, streets and- arterials also states that' "str,et patterns compatible with and complimentary to the general land use plan. .-" shou d be considered. The subject site appears to- be land locked without proper public access. -,,No consideration of access has been addressed in the applicat on. 4. It is possible with the development of an access street to the east o 'connect to Union Avenue N.E. that sufficient access will be provided 'to the si e, However, from the information that has been provided, no access is provided to ' he east, north, west, or. south. 5. It is not clear how utilities will be- provided to the site. ' If they are to be provided from N.E. 4th Street, they will need to be extended the enti e distance across the proposed apartment complex property north and adjacent to ' he subject site. If they are to be provided from Union Avenue N.E., they will n:ed to be extended across City of Renton property or the Wehrman property. P. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the apparent access problem that exists, R-3 zoning' May be appro ed 'only if suitable public access is assured. This could be accomplished by.dedicat ott of norther 30 feet of the subject site together with similar dedication on the adjac:nt properties to the north (proposed apartment complex), past (City of Renton property) and north- east (Wehrman property). Such rezone is further subject to the following conditions in the form of restrictive covenants running with the land: 1. Site development approval. Specific site development plans includin: site plan, landscape plan, building elevation design, and parking and circulatii•n shall be reviewed and approved by the Hearing :Examiner. . T 2. Existing evergreen trees shall be preserved as much as possible and ' corporated into site design, development, and landscape plans., No such trees s all be cut or removed without approval of the Planning Department. Detailed 1. escape and open space plans shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of site devleopmen` t' review. 3. All utilities shall be provided ' Public Works Department approval comprehensive utility plan at the time of si" lopment. 22. 33 'i 3z lo, 1• 1 •-` i•• N,'..11 L_1'1•'i •i•-1'':1 .•.`.,ilt '. - , _._...., _.«._. __..._._........ ' J; ---' . In ". '10 y •• 1( • 1•,.1.i...11,`r *: /ro 1 1 C" 1, a! ;• •i 1' t. . ' e'' i'• 'i•f pip çi1\i t1 yL T j LJ ,. _... 1-1 ,., 11 • 4 i! ,1•1 1 s. `_' 1" i L'1—i { 7 . • tf•• / I L'f-_'_'"r-r::1 1 I G- 7 2 V 0 ei 11("' • % !•/ I I ,, ,. . . , „,. r a . ,.i.•` ;s • r. . 1zf.;.-I,,„..! wm.-,0 _ 11 J _ fib'' 1j J{ i zI1 ••t ul y. • j , ,. 1•111, , .., Iy. I ',•-, 4. I6 IA ' = t: a . 7•1 I. . •Ii•1'7151 i".:L••`1•1• ,.1't.. .1 =.. _1. L°_- 1.i i-1 II 1 y`'• 3 l .. ' • =_— I1 ,. i i R 1 k I`! .. • rt G-.,.. z..,-,::. --,-.3 f\\If) I9 : iP 1TTif" ml m t• t r as 3VO i.,...11 _L: I : i. - i 7 •.- 1 I, ,1— G• r -f + 1 A GR i. I=y,,.,.i 0 I n E Su4TEC7 o, c.o I yam, Ci T e 1 JOSEPHINE 0 . NUNN R-342-79 APPLICANT JOSEPHINE TO?AL AREA ±3. 13 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS 30 '' wide unimproved road extending westerly AfromE Union EXISTING ZONING. AEG° , General Classification District EXISTING USE Undeveloped; Single family residence in southeast ortion 4r the site PROPOSED USE Future use as condominiums or apartments COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Greenbelt, Commercial Medium. Densi 11L1pte r ami1y COMMENT'S i, a.,..1f.Ta..16DaMIC I..,a to.' : .1 in•1.;,:i. v 1 . . ... . :rii 13fri' . . •C:1 ri c:i to m NE. gni sTRE&T .. r I 'v.,..1,-,,•.' :,. . C1 , . i ; ;', - • ,, .1'',p ,., 1:=1 1 •''',:.."2.:... , , . • '. v. .. ' XLI. ' 1,,,,,• i'• ., .*.I • •0 N i i ----. - • . . :. ,,,,,,. , ,,,..,-.,1,K; .4.0 t II .,„.,„;!,. . . . , ..t...,.; . . ,c,,„ el o. 1 " ' .:-.:-.-- ,....,A,•- ., ,,,,. : • '', . m 3sc C i• 4 1 ,.. ...t,4 . ,•,,r,,,i s.,II, • :Zy‘.:::'1.' .4 r . ,,.,:, ,,,.1 .!:r.,;',..,., ,,,-- 1,;.' 1...14--....- •..,,,,:i.`:-. . ,r,',i;'-' 351 ri I i :.•';',..': :.. 1..,:',-`'.,,....., ,,,-,,l4',.--..,,,,,r;:z", , ,, :,,!:.-,. '1 Te i 11 .. ••••:' .•A?'''''',';=. 3trs-0 . ze-. I ..:, .. 4 Tx.;.6 2' .. ••• , . : •: in..... ..11 0 I ' . '. •''•. 1 •I ! •'• '.':.ai; N Z%• '' •Y• •1 ,,' ,I . 1 .39 4 1 I -.A-o. ' it Z i t.1,•'... . : i .....1.-..." MEMMIN 4 . 2 . 1:::09 i I E....-c-r--ag ' l I impoiciaiill111.IM UM MI 1. 6131 11111-11. 4. - lr .,, til[..:7,,., ','' Isl:m1' 6.. '':: 13: zmi4::' 1 .49,.i, ;•.li';'('`,...P.:',i,'..0'4%IC . -5—.$4"'".'''''".'-'..',..k'`.-4', ' • L1 • " '' - '. .6%-.. . 1 i .. -.:. v ' )• ' ''',.‘'' 111 1 ' ,... . ,•..- . :. .!-7:. i 1 : ..7..:,'„..-, • r :.' '... . .• •i 1 f; t I... .,.,-..'..•••'' r:•:.: 1,11 4' 3 j. 3 iii ° in A',..??i, 1•;\ 1 i , ri , c 1.14.:73,,,„ 3'''-'" ',f:141:,,,.;•,,,„.„ , '....-' 1. '','. ..::-...: ,.' .. .', '''.%%. -... , ''.:.:,.:, ',,,..: .. ' : •.....,. , 4,.y..:". 0 '' vi, 0 It cf....,L",P. ,,,,,(-''''' . • i ......•. i.,. -.Ve'f•:.t)"' . ,.., f,••••'''';, . , ;, ,,,,. I l• L Tt.,..1w1. •.,. IIINO.0're......"..- ir#rra Arm/meow."..agaa.M.Mi 01 1 I hy•••••••••••••• II s • or711i . •• ', 9 I I- .• I 0 I. 21) f'dI .. . I", • ' fi;•••es.• wir r..%WI . 1 a 'I ' '• 1 , •' 1 Ie . . I ! 1 I I ' 1 i i 1 Mom Om.. 110..••• 1 I 1 I 04 rirolivai si,.41tidr, . . e:: I • v 1 7 . ... . Sciii.E/" r-- -•-•,, ,-!-,•- -, ..;, SuaTfi'cr si r INg A,..:, - 70sEPHINE o./VaN • REZONE ' A.,--1340. 7 - i• , REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : SIGNIFICANT I I NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Vo 5/ O Y? ii /wt.ea) p s /U wCl 7 e--L Signature of Director or' Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : rrF- A-FFrc. .3, N(7Ai r N IIGNIFICANT I INON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representati e_Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ZU,ksCiliqc,-- SIGNIFICANT I INON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : (:) Finance Department r, Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 2) Public Works Department i v Building ,Div. Engineering Div. t Traffic Engineering Div. ' eld t C —Utilities Engineering—----,- 0 i Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee 40 AP ie eiVitihi 0/e/79 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- dif-'71 ; Application No . : Action Name : )44,449,4A5 IV 1 ,e6 igt i 41067d . A111Pleasereviewtheattached . Review requested by (date ) : Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :=4Efl_ SIGNIFICANT I "rNON SIGNIFICANT r:(72-/ c---- ''')A---(--c.77(74/-:- 7---/(3-A-) /t- ,-57 Comments : tic--e--2-- /7/ 1-"--40z( i_e7 2-3, r-/"C— //'-/,Ozt-A7-3 --1 () I -i s5. cs>iY9-z c a= _77c/s-7/y/c_er 4-A.-/J /,---// 70z.- 27, zi-"J(7-- r G A- - /2c -72 a/L./. ZvZi J/A_-- AlL-/-7 r"---/EC- //1/47-7.-3,a4-A---17S c.c/f7n-C_ j_S. r/2//l0 /1:5 l' i,--2 S Le- 7 /CC2-(/)'(--///c't/-1&:/t- 7---C /..---- Z--1/t.;,: )/27 ,----7-/ 7/i 7 (,-/-..2: LC-A-2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representa ve - Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :• Department : 0 r,Li ri XommentsSIGNIF:ICANT NON SIGNIFICANT C SA/79 Signature of Lirector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (.1-_)C___:- C--__ C=I Approved CD NOt Approved Comments or conditions : c---- t5E---T- t 3-7-/A,../(_-_--, r.:.'_.-si-\.s(..-_-::..---:-/kA u._____-,,,,....3-r-- ---....-:-:>/::/d;c•_,,k_c____0 ,A.1 (.:_s,T.- Z./._Se==------`1 c) . /=) c (.._(i_,- .•-..• C"" 1,4._„ Signap2,7of •Director or Authorized Representative 7 7 epresentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : J., Department : L: t.--:_i_-_--EJ Approved Not Approved /- -/,c e-, c.A --,-/- i•-v4 (-/--,,--;,/;.6 7 :.; i'''- Comments or conditions :i',--/c(., ; /.------,,A.1-..---: /---2 ,--c....-• tr'_z=-4--/-,-,,:,-,--:L.:./-7;• ,/-, i_-_ /:-/,7y),,.: 2/iik---./ -,,`, v.!it--/(} L 4 C (— C v. 0 '// -L/-c..1 1.3:: 1/1 2c!) A-A_./..kj) r7/eC-(//0 e(J 2-5. ;2 4/..-,-,/ a,../i.‘ /,,),,,L.,/ , ,/,../,s --;; .- -,-(.,:72 ,/,:L). j /-//[2-.- j-i>//:..);:7/I A ,7._,F ,_`;‘)i J ;--7.7Z e_ci:-/t-::2 ,//, . /qifir-J 4_, _:,-;,(_,••,e5c' iL:t4_,6- /,_-- 5-42,=•(/ /L--/L-2:/,----:j ;----:-./ ---;.,./C:2-,.:- i .//c.:417/ : ,J„;/ (-- t ,/,7,T::2-- 7;:;;C:;;---) . ,--:,-< Z-/;1--/-A-rzfr:)"----( /,'-:: , (:-,--- c. .. -)c--7. /----6,/,_ C3c-c-_: /• f:',•?,(-(:.-->-' . -71-//""cr • 1- 7------ . Y-, ii•-,-7 -) Signature of Dir'ector or Authorized Represe tative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : , EZ Approved 1 Not Approved Comments or conditions :y----- c'1,.,t --(-• 1, 1,,_;,.::,. Ad:0,2:_:,..,33 • 4)re-,L • ,..,.. 4:•-•' In‘c p cL r\ccccs,.;4:-Isi v-625 P /:),, elk:7Q 14(//C:,..) , 0 I / C7t_.! Ei;f7 ii-rg:.-'••••-\, 41 / t..1 t:i. <•:;SiS(..: V P(%. v k iSi 1...., (0.-',. r r -I/2,-1,J,,,,•L- (.--b.;,,•-t,-.,.,c., , d ic-..Co•--C:.4-5. 3c.," SC.,-'e••1_ ef.(..,„6-1/Z. 5 /7? SignatuI‘ af Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Q Finance Department , 8 Fire Department Library Department 0 Park Department Police Department Y^ Public Works Department 0 R,uilding Div. 4) Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptic a..vm 4t A.'w..i.n.:.•:Mww a'...avi.P.I O Traffic Engineering Div . 7 • O Utilities Engineering Div. ; FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee g//,A(// 41é2t/ DATE : OA, PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : V45 PAkt 6• waled LOCATION :t 0• k. /.'1:,ill /f0 A ?o4 APPLICATION(S) : to --- te- if-V- 7 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX I ER RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 1461 . REVIEW BY OTHER :CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 2e /iie'e ipl e EI 'Approved Not Approved Comments. or conditions : Lel cl CZ N5Lr' 2/ Signature of Dire ector or Authorized Representative , Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ii, 77/ c , 1. )k-, :-", ( /0( i ‹,.. t !v c. EJ Approved Not -Approved Comments or conditions : J(J Y J I i; 1 Can d I -1 I a O IC cy fro p'/ eC c - .-_'m f-b P -Y- p +"-4- s/2"C__-. _.f Signature of- Director or Auti,,, sized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL :LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE iN-SIGNIFICANCE Application No. R-342-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-462-79 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to R-3 - for future development of either condominium or apartment units. Proponent JOSEPHINE O. NUNN Approx. 750' south of 4th, along the Queen Ave extension betw. Location of Proposal Greenwood Cemetery on the west and City of Renton property on the east. Lead Agency CITY OF REN'DON PLANNING DEPT. This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS 0 is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : A negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared for the rezone only, and subject to further "environmental review at the time of site development. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible O f f i c i a l GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title Planni • i e r Date May 16, 1979 w• Signature . L 1 City of Renton Planning Department 5 76 R-342-79 Page Two required preservation of existing evergreen trees. Mr. Munson indicated that removal of vegetation on the easterly portion of the site would be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The applicant referenced Section I.3 (Impact on the Natural or Human Environment,- Schools) and stated that due to the existing power line easement on the site, proposed density would be much less than estimated in the Planning Department report which would subsequently reduce the impact upon school population. The Examiner inquired regarding proposed plans for facilities which will be developed under the transmission easement. Mr. Wolf advised that final plans have not been completed. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Dave Homer 13706 139th Avenue S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Homer indicated that dedication to the city of sanitary sewer lines located under the transmission easement would be completed by the end of the week. He also advised his understanding that the intersection located at N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue is proposed for improvement to provide channelization for left turn movements. Mr. Clemens confirmed the proposal contained in the first year of the Six Year Street Program to alleviate current traffic congestion in the area. The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department staff. Since there were no further comments, the hearing on File No. R-342-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:45 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of +3.13 acres from General (G) District to R-3 District for the future development of multi-family residential units. 2. The Planning Department report, as modified, sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the. State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The subject site is located approximately 750 feet south of N.E. 4th Street. The property was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 2249, dated June 22, 1966, and it was at that time that the present G zoning was applied. 8. Except for a single family residence in the southeast portion of the property, the site is mostly undeveloped. The site is traversed in an approximate north-south direction by a BPA transmission line easement. There is a significant stand of trees in.the easterly portion of the site. 9. The land use in the area consists of the Greenwood Cemetery to the west; Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park to the south; and scattered single family homes to the east. A large apartment complex lies to the north along N.E. 4th Street. This general area has been in transition from undeveloped and scattered homes to commercial and apartment uses. 10. The Comprehensive Plan's map element indicates that this area would best be developed as a mix of commercial, medium density residential and greenbelt. The greenbelt designation appears to. be directed toward the power line easement in the westerly portion of the site. May 25, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND . USE HEARING EXAMINER. CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Josephine 0. Nunn FILE NO. R-342-79 LOCATION: Approximately 750 feet south of N.E. 4th Street along th- Queen Avenue extension between Greenwood Cemetery on the west and the City of Renton property on the east. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to R-3 fo' future development of either condominium or apartment units. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with restrictive covenant- . RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive- covenants. PLANNING ,DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received oy REPORT: the Examiner on May 17, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING:After reviewing the•Planning Department report, examinin', available information on file with the application, and ield checking the property arid surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 22, 1979 at 10:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of th- Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify-were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and revie ed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Steve Munson, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibit into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map David Clemens, Planning Department, corrected Sections I.2 and I.5 of Exhibit #1 •o state that the- proposal will contain 94 units .and will increase traffic in the area by approximately 570 trips 'per day. The Examiner requested a departmental recommendation regarding proposed access si' ce the property does not directly connect to an unimproved right-Of-way located north of the site, and inquired if the unimproved roadway extends through city-owned property to the east. Mr. Munson advised the intent of the applicant to utilize property currently zone• for development located east of the site as part of future development, and confirmed that the unimproved right-of-way extends through city-owned property. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Terry Wolf 1101 Pike Street Seattle, WA 98101 Mr. Wolf indicated his understanding from review of Planning Department records. t at the existing unimproved right-of-way ,is proposed for full improvement to a 60-foot public street, and indicated the applicant's intent to provide, access via that right-of- ay through property located north of ,the site. Mr'. Munson confirmed that although a full street is proposed, dedication of the city property has not yet occurred. The Ex: iner inquired regarding the applicant's, intent in providing utility services to the si e. Mr. Wolf advised that an existing sanitary sewer line extends through the propert, . adjacent to the power line easement, and a water line is available within the uni proved right-of-way north of the site. Mr. Munson advised that participation by the property owner to the north of the site could occur concurrently in improvement of the rig t-of-way prior to development. Mr. Wolf requested confirmation of. extent of improvements to the,roadway. Mr. M nson indicated that improvements including curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving, sto m • drainage and street lighting as denoted in the Planning Department recommendatio would be required. Mr. Wolf asked Mr. Munson to identify on Exhibit #2 the location o R-342-79 Page Four 4. There have been some recent rezones in the area immediately adjacent to the subject property and a number of new developments have been built both north and south of the subject property. There are also some proposals for other properties in the vicinity in the development stage. Therefore, it is timely to consider this rezoning application for the subject property. 5. The properties to the north have been subject to certain development conditions to permit a smooth transition between the more intense uses along N.E. 4th Street and the remaining G zoning. This property should also be required to balance its proposed uses with existing conditions such as the mobile home park on the south and the G zoning along the west. To facilitiate this transition the subject site should limit both the height of the development and the setbacks. The 35-foot height limitation is reasonable for a transition between the existing uses and a 30-foot setback would create a reasonable buffer between the proposed uses and the existing uses. Development of this property subject to the enumerated conditions should permit the development of uses which are compatible with surrounding development and provide much needed housing in the eastern portion of the city. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Examiner that the City Council approve the reclassification from G to R-3 subject to: 1. Provision of adequate access to and from the property per applicable city ordinances and regulations. 2. Retention of the existing vegetation, with the approval of the Planning Department before any trees are removed. 3. Approval of the Planning Department of all site and landscape plans. 4. Building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 5. Building setbacks along the southern and western boundaries should be not less than 30 feet. 6. Participation in any future LID to improve access to the property; including but not limited to Union Avenue S.E. and N.E. 4th Street. 7. Execution of restrictive covenants incorporating these conditions signed by the owners of the property. ORDERED THIS 25th day of May, 1979. Fred J. Ka an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of May, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Terry Wolf, 1101 Pike Street, Seattle, WA 98101 Dave Homer, 13706 139th Avenue S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Josephine 0. Nunn, 251 Union Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of May, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Joan Walker, Planning Commission Chairperson Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 8, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record take further action as he deems proper. R-342-79 Page Three 11. The zoning in the area reflects the uses present. Toward the north the zoning is B-1 and R-3. The cemetery to the east is designated G, and the mobile home pa is T zoning. 12. The site has no adequate access available. The areas to the north were requir=d to dedicate property for the eventual construction of an east-west street connect'ng with Union Avenue N.E. The applicant stated at the hearing that by various ag,eements the subject site will be able ,to use the .proposed new street. 13. Both the mobile home park and the apartment complex were recently developed. cross N.E. 4th Street a proposal exists to develop a commercial office complex. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate compliance with at least one of the three . . criteria of Section 4-3014 which provides in part' that: a. The site has not been considered in a previous area wide rezone; b. The subject site is potentially zoned for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There have been demonstrated changes in the area since the last rezoning a tion. The applicant and Planning Department have demonstrated that the necessary cri eria to permit a rezone of' the subject property have been met. 2. The G classification which the property is now zoned was automatically applies to the site when it was annexed, into the city. The procedure is followed whenever a . annexation occurs (Section 4-729: (B) ) . The G classification is basically a pr•tective classification which enables the city to study the area in question at a late Lime to determine the area's appropriate use. The Comprehensive Plan is the only action besides the annexation which dealt ith the area in which the subject site is located. No Other actions have considered the area's potential since annexation. 3: The Comprehensive Plan generally' indicates that the area in which the subject property is located is suited for the classification for which the applicant has applied. The property is divided by the transmission line.and this area is designated as g een belt. Also a part of the area appears to have been potentially designated for comme cial use. The Comprehensive Plan though is not an absolute indicator of a specific site s use - zoning accomplishes that purpose. The classification which an area is zoned .hould depend on the adjoining area's classifications as well as the best use for th- subject property. The zoning applied for appears to meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan to provide medium density residential zoning in the area. The R-3 zoning would se compatible with surrounding uses, as .they exist, and proposed uses of adjoini g areas. To the north the B-1 zoning is used almost exclusively for multi-family apart ents. The mobile home park to the south provides the amenities of single family dwellings and would be compatible with the probable use of this property for medium density residential development. The subject property does suffer from the lack of adequate access which the Comprehensive Plan indicates as necessary for the proposed use of this land. "Convenient .ccess to major arterials and highways is. important" and "street patterns compatible w'th and complimentary to the general land use plan" are desirable when proposing residential development (Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, Residential; page 11) . The applicant concedes that access is necessary and maintains that it will b= provided via the property to the north. In order to insure appropriate access to the property, such access should ,be•made a condition of approval. The condition should no' foreclose the applicant's potential development scheme and therefore it will not require a particular method or location for the access. The Comprehensive Plan as previously noted showed that the transmission• line easement was appropriate for the provision of green belt and such use of the easement is . reasonable. Therefore, the applicant should make provision for open space/recreational use of this area. Also, along similar lines, the applicant should preserve Js much of the natural character of the property as possible (Comprehensive Plan, page 1) and therefore, per the Planning Department's recommendation, the stand of trees •n the easterly portion.of the property should be preserved. R-342-79 Page Five An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. i 4 0to% . I 0 r I . . . en CD1=3 1:::)..43 NE:..:-.. ..•.... .. 4.64..4.1.;•1,.4,ePr'.1,"/i0,,4...143•41;' 5TRE. r T' 1t Ki C 1 4 LIIM.I.I3MM.ono 4 351 CH•. 1 , .• •!:::01,,.. . ... .si44'.'' •i:Li,;',.,,1•N,... ,.;•!•,:,• ir., NI I ,:'0:, :• ..•-y.,'-r-,-,'?.'"' ,,,,,.:,.,,:r-ii',: .,: r„., iii.,:i. ,,,t'. 1 • • ..•r ase1 t.;, L - '. r ', :. -1,,•!.:.„!,t3/4, t 7 .:.;,:,.,,c,:!g, ,,,,....-.i: ....,-,Arr,:.;:;,..,;;: -- : ,..,.' 31113 z . a JAatollY +tadaraiss' Clisrl . ...'il (-i,,,.. -."4-...., . ..-,...'..: ',.....-.',.• ' .:', : ,,,!::1:1 , ...„.... . . 1 : ... •''' ' - .. ? i I'..', : 777'.•'......,-,,''`':.:::'•''..,"'".•'::•':•''' •-•L' PL:.• .. •iftr x • s •L L-0°: •: ''''...‘ '-'''r -.,.. v.,. • -:.,:• 1 ,,L:,v.'•:..!, . Ti) r esii am*iniii me 1, de...WWI- " ' . V. -r. •:... ,,.,:.„ , • , ., .. ., ,. .-..4"...t,44i.' 1,-:;er.-# :L. . n.1 . II c.... or•... 41. •••••1,...•i ........ 4 DN 7-.....„.. • k.1, ,,,r 0,... • 1 I r• .:•.:, . r .. f.1 0.0..,- ---..----„,,, ..<ri 1?4)1.41 .,- Ion-Pa •- -.',,, u) . . i 2.... 1 3•• • r,•.., -.,• • . . ' I • i f) 1-).-;.• i i e;..,,i.ic-14 . . • , t.., - •itAkc,‘ i7e,)kie,...f.,.? t,t r r MOM=MD 41111111 r " Wei. ./.. . . '':..• ' • - ' .. '`. , :- '. ..:. -' ; ,. .,,,' _ _i,_. ,..... „ . 2:: • . ,,,,., ,IL i 1, . 0.i 40....-Itto'tai-,-, ',....ii., . • r ilrLA .hror,.-; li...' dkat131;i.v.e';;;;1•Irrs' , .0.;;,.;. '-. L OM Mill . 111.Mill Oil MM.WIN iliN 111. .., sip up N.um me=yr mei op ors.iiie Ns rim op mai,••4 VI ili;:lr '' ; 7, , •ciII I H • 5..ar.iinr..1.,,,i ''' ' '. ,i ... ' t 1 P r t•.';' ; ' L.': fOlif. it; , 0:'; ; ". 1 '-; ''. .!.' ' 4. .. ...; ' . r .; r .. elk k''''''''. ;''r: 1 i 't ''' „. e'44.•' ''tr.' ' ., '.. 'I ..... i 0 ' 1 L r,., tt 0 ,• L i.),.....„.,04, 1 1 I i 4 . 1 1 w........-.. e,.....•,;"....4., ,,.....,....,„,i IN I i i r . 02 ii 1 13 1 i i f ...., .-:.... C3ii • :— • " . : ' . 3. 1 C I —r"-•"1... .' La I1 : i iv 1 ; i ........ i H il, 1 .. ..., jiT',lamp sraiker . , •• _- . , ffff....0 i 4.ol,... e Scace/•1 L • . L .•e.4418zscr serif-ED LL Ipse-Pinivs• O.AAJNAI . . L fitIONC olt.•34,1-71 ilk:... .. , . :. - • . . , qp,-..-i,i,--,•,•-.-.-. •-• : .• . • . , A,Alf,::. . , • . , N.,,,,Ai. -:-...,•• ,i.. „ . y....a,+ .. .)....,.. Lii-,..,:• ...atnt— -p ae."_'• , , Z..31 ' f2 1'. %s ' ,. a:••'-'7 L`1 e.' Q, a.•( .•.'...1'.Jal'•\ J" ' ' j-'i - -- - '- - - - - r rl1„ i.) ,, J• 0i.• w •,' •.. .;. ., ,r_ r ,' ,— T•,• • y `•j` !y 1• ' ` l' 1 '{ . . .1 '1.r-i •I.I•'_' •' .to..r r as1` -- i 4 •.... •r • j Y . lat•..la•.d•.a•.aa•,1 I \ s 1 • • ,a,..11 M al 1c•-, :r ' `'F1; ;. y ` ,, rw • r .f.• ' Iii :• f'' 11"T• J!G-1' f--s; 1" „ . .....:.>9,,\ 3],t,..-A..... i„i I I! to•1•j1` 153 ,(,,'1( t[ ''•• t- eWf_5 0a•' r n'y / a; tg e 41 I 1 I .LY.L2'1r1i 2-!Jy Lla.'i.__:'`•' ali '9 R,^I .—'4,• •• sR j r gi. 1;\ 15 ' 14 AI',,,:1;1-44.11 4:41: 11 t0 s .i 11 rl'1" } 7. 1.11T J v.•o®......Is• it m.Pw F •%•. •J® I SR-•i I . , i r F r 1 • ' 1 4 1 0 i, , , . I to , It T B I s r GREENWOOD f i' 1 r Oar C.E=.1,E TLk) 31 -'---' . . :°, r r h MSU8TEci q lIt i t . 4 JOSEPHINE 0 . NUNN R-342-79 I TOTAL AREA .±3 APPLICANT JOSEPHLNE 30 wide unimproved road extendin.. westerl 0 Union PRINCIPAL ACCESS Ave NE G" General Classification District EXISTING ZONING . r I EXl5T ING USE Undeveloped; Single family residence in southeast •ort.ion th-. site PROPOSED USE Future use as condominiums or apartments. : Greenbelt,' Commercial. Medium Den,-it F.,. i ; COMPRENEW51:1IE... LAND: USE PLAN b i s a a_l Y. 4t: COMMENTS, ' ...• cI is an F.: E ,b,•xM1dLvw•> AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 25th day of May 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this gb day of a 19 `1R a.X\W( Notary Public in and for the State;; of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Josephine 0. Nunn; R-342-79 The minuted contain a Zat ai the paxti..e4 os necond) 1 , OF I qy THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 0, 9gTeD SEPc - 140 June 1, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-342-79; Josephine O. Nunn Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report'and Recommendation regarding the referenced rezone' request, dated May 25, 1979. The appeal'period for the application expires on June 8,. 197.9, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on June 11, 1979, and will be placed on the Council agenda on June 18, 1979. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter,. please contact the office of the undersigned. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment ephine O. Nunn 42-79 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Josephine O. Nunn, a single woman, is the owner of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Tax Lot No. 21/Tax Account #162305-9021-06: The North 1/2 of the Southwest 14 of the Northeast Is of the Northeast h of Section 16, Township 23, Range 5, EWM, less North 125 feet. WHEREAS, the owner of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes, grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, her successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: ACCESS Development of the site shall be subject to provision of adequate access to and from the property per applicable' city.ordinances and regulations. The owner of the above described property, her successors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covenant to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initiated proposal, and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements, including but not limited to Union Avenue S.E. and N.E. 4th Street, required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improvements shall include but may not be limited to the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, undergrounding of utilities, and street lighting. SITE DEVELOPMENT All site and landscape plans shall require approval by the Planning Department, City of Renton. Retention of existing vegetation is recommended, and Planning Department approval is required prior to removal of any trees on the site. The building height shall not exceed 35 feet. The building setbacks along the southern and western boundaries shall not be less than 30 feet. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these'covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. r osepll ne O. Nunn STATE OF WASHINGTON) I COUNTY OF KING -) On this \'1 day of jv» p 19"1`l, before me personally appeared Josephine O. Nunn, the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. W,a rn a.L.e Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in 1)A-, r 2- OF J iv db THE CITY OF RENTON o 2. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 NALL g CHARLES J. DELAURENTI• MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 3.1) 43- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 eo SEP1° 5 June 11, 1979 Mr. Terry Wolf 1101 Pike Street Seattle, WA 98101 RE: File No. R-342-79; Josephine O. Nunn Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Wolff This is to notify you, that the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced request, dated May 25, 1979, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk A OF RA, o THE CITY OF RENTON o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o6.1 ammo CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 Q3 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0, 9gr D SEP1°° June 1, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-342-79; Josephine 0. Nunn Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced rezone request, dated May 25, 1979. The appeal period for the application expires on June 8, 1979, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on June 11, 1979, and will be placed on the Council agenda on June 18, 1979. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the office of the undersigned. Sincerely, 11V• Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment ISO ryTg ter G ^u 3, t , Renton City Council 6l1£3179 Page 4 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued The committee report recommended the following ordinances for first reading: ORDINANCE k3324 Ordinance was read delet.ing, certain sections of city code Police re police regulation's. MOVED'BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE TO ADVANCE Regulations TO SECOND AND FINAL READ1NGS°., CARRIED.. Following readings it WAS MOVED BY PERRY,: .SECOND SHANE TO ADOPT-.THE' ORDIN'ANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL:ALL AYES(Exce.pt Counc,il.man •Trimm who.was' not present).MOTION CARRIED. Alley Vacation Ordinance was read vacating a portion of alley between. SW 12th between SW 12th and SW 13th Streets as petitioned by Gunnar- Ostlund. VAC-11-79. 13th Streets MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE TO ,REFER:BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS VAC-11-79 COMMITTEE. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items .are distributed 'to all Council members and adopted by one motion without separate discussion unless requested. Adopting moti'on:.to follow agenda items.) MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY TO REMOVE ITEM 8d RE WEST HILL FROM THE AGENDA. CARRIED:. West Hill Request Letter from West .Hill Community (Jane Gavin, 265 Lind Ave. NW) was for Building read listing proposed building requirements- for condominiums Requirements on the West Hill . MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND PERRY TO REFER TO THE. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. CARRIED. Councilwoman Shinpoch took no part in discussion due to conflict of interest. LID 307, Raymond City Clerk Mead reported June 13, 1979 bid opening for LID 307, Ave. SW - Bid Raymond Ave . SW street improvements and sanitary sewers. See Opening attached tabulation. Refer to Public Works Department and Transportation Committee. (See Transportation Committee report page 3. ) - Request for Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested. travel. Travel authorization for Cliff Davis for Multisonics training on new , - . Multiplex Test Unit. in .Oakland, California. Request for 135.00 advance travel . funds. Concur. Alley Vacation City Clerk Mead reports petition filed by E. Pierotti for alley . between SW 12th vacation between SW 12th and. SW 13th Streets . (VAC-14.-79) .Refer 13th Streets to Public Works Dept. , Board of Public Works, and Transportation - VAC-14-79) Committee for verification' of petition, appraisal and easements. Also refer- to .Ways and' Means Committee: for resolution setting August 6, 1979 for public hearing. Concur. 75% Petition City Clerk Mead report 75% annexation petition filed for Lazetti Lazetti annexation. Area in vicinity East of Kirkland Ave. NE & West of Annexation Honey Creek Park and North of the City Limits. Request for public .hearing to bp set for. July 16, 1979. .Coecur. 10% Letter of City Clerk Mead reports 10% Letter of Intent. to annex property Intent - Union in the vicinity West of 136th Ave. SE ,to Union Ave. NE , South Ave.NE Annexation of NE 4th St. to SE 2nd P1 . Request for public meeting to be , , set for July 9, 1979. Concur.' LID 307-Monterey Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested acceptance Terrace of completion of LID 309 Monterey' Terrace Underground Conversion as of June 12, 1979 and. set the hearing for' the Final Assessment Roll on July 23, 1979. The .final roil was submitted in the amount of $61,279:60. Concur. Josephine Nunn Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive covenants of 1` Rezone . rezone R-342-79, Josephine 0. Nunn, from G -to R-3. Property R-342-79 located 900' So. NE: 4th; West of Union NE ,. between Greenwood Cemetery & City property. Concur and, refer to Ways and Means • ' . Committee for. Ordinance. - , f< 3 Y -1 y Josephine 0. Nunn ' t ,,:,',"y:DECLARATION OF. .TRLCTIVE- C0V N'. S:::,; - s' WHEREAS, Josephine O. Nunn, a• single woman, is the owner of :the following real 1":'=• '';p 'operty in the City of Renton, County of;.K ng, State of Washington;,, described as fcskLlows: Tax Lot No. 21/Tax Account #162305-9021-Q6 M•.i.. The North 1 of the Southwest 14 of the Northeast .of ,the..Northeast 4. of, Section 16, Township 23, Range 5, EWM, less North 125 feet,..' 4 WHEREAS,' the owner of said described property, hereinafter. "the-property;" i C04 desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running •with the land as to r+r! • use, present and future, of the property; - ' NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner hereby establishes•, 'grants and,-,imposes - 1:r',_;::'restrictions and covenants running with the , .;and as to the•,use -of, the land. hereinabove a sors -heirs and assigns,described with respect to the•use.:by .theactGsigned,• hey:=:itv '•s , c}n . as follows: ACCESS.. w `;{ .''.. '' Development of the 'site shall be subject.to provision:of adequate access .to and i.'.-'-.'from the property per applicable city ordinances and regulations.' ' - The owner of the above described 'property, her sucaese0xs,•,heir's 'and.assigns,, , - , hereby agree and covenant to participate in,' 'sign a petit ._c i ;,in •support:of,,and accept . any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initiated proposal, •;an 'pay -their ' . fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing-the-necessary off=site•:'fluprovements, ' including but not limited to Union Avenue 'S:E•.,aand N.,E: 4th 'Street,,.requized 'by the- Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improvements shall-include but may not••be, limited ' to the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street:paiyi.ng,..sanitary,;sewers, ', storm sewers, undergrounding of utilities,-,and street lighting,. .: , - '. , . H • - ,-, - SITE DEVELOPMENT . All site and landscape plans shall require approval by the-Plan,ning, ,Department, City of Renton. Retention of existing vegetation is recommended, and Planning Department approval is required prior to removal of any trees-,,on. the' site. The building height shall not exceed .35 feet. The building setbacks along the southern and western-boundaries 'shall not be less than 30 feet. ir -' DURATION These covenants shall run with the ,land and expire on' December 31, 2025: If at , any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion 'of the, covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of 'further documentation. I Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated 4. F;.>;' by either the City of Renton or any property, ,owners -adjoining subject•property Who :. k .t.: •; eT •ar adversely affected by any violation or-4areach of• .these. 'xestr' ctive Covenants-- Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding Will be borne by the parties whom the court determines. are in.error,and shall be entered awe judgment in such action. a• dd=ns'-s Yltn cif x:.,,rY., kFt%',iji, y .. tnc11oRetoo i t CounoC Pa 2579. a9 x`Con tinuI`e-.=:Co n.tMe Fi ma'sa`. ;q s Yi' t re Mayor:,oiiie: fin the a a :i f os •ti n of the..heart n Would 'be , ad Y-- ne . -osti ng s would•'::be'made.: MOVED :BY.r ' ' _ Del aurenti'' noted routs , .:p,9 r R PUBLIC' HEARING'`„BE:.:SET::FOR-'J,ULY':„23; `1979: -;=;:;: '' °`STREDICKE; •SECOND..PERRY' P .. -. r':.: TO'•REVIEW•'COMP.REHENSIVE PLAN:-ANDT.ZONINC.:RECOMMENDAT;IONS 'FOR A `'• ; r C 'RRIED:; a'-- . THE WEST WILL::AREA .. A, Reoess - MOVED BY''.SHANE, •SECOND:PERRY; .COUNChL''::,RECESS; 'GARRI ED:`;.,;..:., ,.. n, l`l-1R1 .Caand `:r c n verseat:-9: 0 m: P:r es ed' 0eCS_P r` rese"m be s:.i' me n1oc,A u n P. h dren Left :. .-MOVED 'BY: PERRY, `SECOND SHINPOCH, SUSPEND:-TME -RULES.... ,..HEAR ., ..,:.,..,..:,:: ,_, -..,.Chil Unattended i n•`- • I'TEM. 9a. RE CHILDREN LEFT UNATTENDED.:.I;N,_VEHICLE , ' 'CARRIED `:4:,{, .:".._.:. Letter-was. read from' Ma•or `De'leuren.ti. -noting:. reports' of.:;;•`:5 llehi cl,es, Y c' n :.w o: are,, l e1t 'd:.-e;`ore_--sma=tl: ch :l:dre hserious' in.urfies: of ,ice p. tire,,'f t. ref!rred':` :: r dt:-ahe:matter be ,0 . .unattended .in::vehi cues,."and,:reques'te°.__ ss.+'"; to the -Publ,i c:Safety''Commi'ttee°,,to -consi.der.^•enactment`'of;:-a s. 4i Iii1' e.' MOVED 'BYY'':CLYMER, "SECOND'', CONCUR:'IN:::'.,.:,:,.'° ,,,,,,;;:. ,,•.::City Ordinancenan.c_ C;SAFE'CY'':COMMITTEE_., _ CARR=IEDTHEREQUEST' WAND `REFER.:Tb'-THE`P'UB 'I D EXECUTIVE ;:SESSON :rv': ;.,E cecuti,ve MOVED BY STREDLC'KE.,: SECOND ,PERRY; COUNCIL:`,HOL i. C NEGOTIATIONS.' CARRSIED.:`9i',25 :m;:'''`'and recon:veneds;_! ..—Sess dn.s TO.DIS USS t° ;:r resen ,. nci:'1=::_gym `b'e ,s-::; 4 Ro.TI- .Call' ;A]1 :cou em p.. at 10 0 :m: Y• I a•rO•RDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS J fir;-: resented .commi;tte •,:::,<, ',.,,,,..yWa s and Means Ways and Means Committee :chairman Clyne ,p z.a. , , :;;r. Committee .Report report recommending,: the following Ordi.nances:;for.'f•i rsti rea'd:i:ng f Ca'l'ifornia°'Ave.tr t Vacation= Ordinance was read vacating „a,•portiAn'`o ., r-::S ee X :, MOVED'.BY `CLY'MER<`7,:,;p: ;,'rportion--of N. 7th. 4-40 as peti-ti,one4,-Oy,Mr. -`Woi; : : O California. Ave. .. SECOND SHANE TO REFER ,.BACK -TO 'TH£ WAYS'' AND MEANS:'-COMMITTEE` L -AC-- -CARRIED.:4 79 R ent' :f ,'roads;n c was. read ,a ro ri ati n fund$;:•far the=paym, <p _ Appropriating . Ord an e. pp• p 9' t:'of"' -6":9 10 00 '-<a_,: r.,;•,:,:,'.;_': t :', . :':Funds-Monster: . " construction work .on Monster road.._i n::;the,.-amoun, • ,.. ...$ .,, - ,:, Road. Revised) MOVED. .BY CLYMER,'',SECOND SHINPOCH TO REFER BACK TO:-;, ::`; .,:' ':'_- Revised) WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE CARRIED'. 1."!"....,'''..: ORDINANCE #3325 Ordinance was read approving and=conf•i.rmi:ng: the: assessments Approving- and - . and assessment. roll of Local :Improvement :District No: 297 •for the y Confirming. Final improvement of the :Heather,,-Downs .area.:by:doing all,work,,necessary..:::,,,-::::, Assessment Roll,in. connection; therewith, :levying.-ends;asses s'ing. the amounts.: therefor a:k LID 297-Heather . against the:several ..lots, '•tracts, parcel-s,:of. land and: other property Y ' Oowns,. as `shown. on :said' assessment roll i•as confirmed '-.by the city;;counc,ll, and •providing for -the :payment-of. ..such :;as;sessments, into the. l oca:l r a 'crea'ted'' bimroveinentfund; District:No::.29.7-:of:' the,='City s.'Y:::'',-.:.': 4 r,'_ .', ;:: in N 3120.° :MOVED':BY -CLYMER ;SECOND• .PERRY :TOLL;ADVANCE,lTO :,°;:::r:',., Ord ance . o SECOND AND- FINAL READINGS:- :';CARRIED:`. "`After.: readings;.`;i,t`,was MOVED `t '' BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE TO,:ADOPT THE''ORDINANCE.AS.'-READ- ROLL:::CALL,;_ ALL',AYES, EXCEPT COON C'ILMAN :STRED,I'CKE MOTION:CARR'IED a,.' s' .`;,' Turner Agent for Ordinance was_ read: changing:;'-the zoning: .'classification of certain Banchero/Flores properties within the: Cit from residence single 'fami:l` district Y 1.' ;i' , ''Rezone,..R-234-78 Bai MOVED<<BY;-2, y:R-1) to residence distr,ict{R-3) nchero:°Rezone R.'234: 78, i: COMMITTEE ;:.CLYMER, SECOND .SHANE TO REFER°; BACK ,Tt)..TNiE.WAY5. AND 'MEANS CARRIED. . S'chwartzenber er ' Ordinance was read changi:ng'.''the zoning: cl..,assification-of:certai'n :.,9 . Rezone R=339-79 • properties within the;-City.; from general classification district r?: ' : • '' : ' G) to residence'district (:R-4) Schwartzenberaerz Rezone..R-339 79 MOVED B'Y'.'CLYMER,• SECONf PERRY'..TO --REFER',BACK TO WAYS AND ',MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED t;. a`:1 sifcaton:>b c Zn{ .in the zonii' :c. as, N n' Rezone Ordi nonce, .was read cha g g;9r.,, ri ct;:,.mfromenera'l','doss--i-fi,ca ftOn< d s"t 1 f,..•.R-342-79 properti!es:;within tie:'C irty` g M,:VED -BY :, ,,R-`3 Nunn::Reo.rie. R-342-79':. 0 _G 'to; res i deuce di s:tri ct,,:..( )MMI`fTEE .t BAC° :'TO:',•:THE:WAYS AND' :MEANS::GO r...ND:S ANE=.TO:',REFER K. 4 :;:!; „,,:=RERRY .:SEGO H CARRIED. W, ` ..: t rr:! r h..afi,.,,' c'•k.'l:ti': .:a t ;.^",ii;P r 1`'a'! , v.\„ T.' k".b, ' t r.<:i ,,r.4_Ut`.ta, . 4' ri"r.`,.d. .Sa iR", si 'tor .,'.: :.c ,.,...,, q a'i.f ;,P.rry CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3331 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (a) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT_ R-3) R-342-79/NUNN WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as 'the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been•zoned as General Classification (G); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about April 24, 1979, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 22, 1979,,and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated May 25, 1979; the Planning Director is hereby authorized 'and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located at approximately 750 feet South of N.E. 4th St. along the Queen Ave extension between Greenwood Cemetery on the west and the City of Renton property on the east)' AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owners on or about June 1, 1979 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections,Receiving No. 7906180679 and which said Covenants hereby incorporated and made a part hereof'as if fully set forth. SECTION II: This.Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of July , 1979. cam/ be o es zaze City Cle k APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this of 1979. ar es elaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: July 6 1979 Ordinance # 3331 EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF AREA TO BE REZONED TO R-3: Tax Lot No. 21/Tax Account #162305-9021-06: The North 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 16, Township 23, Range 5, EWM, less North 125 feet. f a 1\ iii l- J 0 r n CI c' o NE. YIN- 7/ E T 1 I C o I w ; fat-.¢,`' .,. 1 nl 3sc B 1 1 9 NI 1• ti Sys z - tji , i' c 1 r. f Pram 11 rr. 1,;.• 1 t r I1 1'' t1 on no on t• r t. rrra rre r rrr. rra t• mu , ti rai rri in MN r® vb 11 el 1 1, 71::, .,: ." '... . ', ' 0 . N11\ 1\1 l 0233 11 Li hi1 Cal SoarscrstrrOg OSEPHINE O. MIJNN R6ZDNE A- 311- 79 OF R.4, h` t; ® ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055mao po CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD p coQ, CITY CLERK 9" 0 SERIF .. July 11, 1979 1101 Pion Street Seattle , WA. 98101 The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, 9e 197hasadoptedJuly Ordinance ,r . 331 A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:jeb Enclosure l`'-ec . ./2(x--1`17-1)'::(el 31,):--2'.:g.. . .. .-*.-:' ' ' ,. ' '-''''‘''.,:',;'L•_ ' . ' - ::”. -, ' -' :, • . Renton City Council 7/2/79 Page 3 Recess .. MOVED:,BY•`.SHANE,' SECOND •SI4INPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Time: • 9130 p.m: '. Coun #1?'reconvened at,•'-'9:•50 p:m. Roll Call, All . . Council Members ;present. Introduction '• Mayor `DelaurentV' introduced -King. County Councilwoman Patricia Thorpe:.` Mrs:-`Thorpe -expl'ai•ned King County condomi n i um ordinance... ', Further, ,discussion 'ensued.', Caren Wharton explained tenant rights.,, OLD BUSINESS ' Councilman Perry':inquired of legality and identification problems • fgr, persons for. using,:surnames only,on election signs. , Councilman Stredicke•'asked removal' of new cars parked on City right-of-way i n -vicinity of Burnett Ave. proposed 1 i near park. Mayor•' Delaurenti -advised corrective measures will be taken. ORDINANCES' AND RESOLUTIONS' 1 • - Ways and Means The'. Ways' 'and Means.'Cnrimittee':Chaii-man Clymer presented report • Committee Report recommending s•econd'andti~ina l;'readings, of the following ordinances: Ordinance #3327 . -(i:irst•.readings':6/25'79-)` .`:. " ' • . Street Vacation • 'Ordinance read vacai ing.a;,portion°:of California Ave. (VAC-4-79). Portion of also- known as, •N-.• 7th:4,,t.r.•,;.'as petitioned-.by Wong. MOVED BY CLYMER,. ' California Ave.' ' ' SECOND. PERRY,-AOPPlv,..THE':OlIDINA.NCE.AS READ, .,. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. .' . CARRIED. a. : - 4.*.. ' Ordinance #3328 , An _ordinance was ''read appropriating ,$6,910 to be received from Appropriation Burlington Northern 'Railroad•far' payment of road construction Monster Road.'work on Monster•Road '' VED'`•'BY;.•TRIMM, 'SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ' Construction, ORDINANCE AS READ.:-; •ROLL'CALL:;•,AL-L;:AY.ES. :CARRIED. Ordinance '#3329 An'or di Hance was-"read'rezonitng.''property. from R-1 to R-3 1 ocated , Banchero Rezone ' " at the. touthwest .-corner 'of NE- 1'2'th•'St. -and 'Edmonds Ave. NE; Mi ke'y R-234-.78 er, , Turn 'agent for Banchero•'and..Florer. . MOVED BY CLYYMER, SECOND • ' SHANE,' ADOPT THE ORDINANCE A'S,'READ: ' ROLL' CALL: 6-AYES AND ONE- NO:- STREDICKE. MOTION:•CARRIED::•• ' Councilman Stredi cke requested -'' • . confirmation of.covenants•-,and •dedicati'on ''of right-cf-way, being • confirmed by the City Clerk,. ti ' Ordinance' #3330 ; Ordinance was read iezon1ng' property‘`•from' G •to R-4 located at Schwartzenberger - :, west side''of-Shattuck Ave, S': .at ''.intersection of S. 6th St. ' Rezone R-339-79 ` ' MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND-:CLYMER-, .ADOPT 'THE:ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL:•- ' ALL•:AYES.; ' CARRIED r:<: • • .., Ordinance '#3.331 ,„• , ,,,An Ordinance-,was •read:rezona rig;;'property from, G to R-3 1 ocated Nunn Rezone approximately ,750 ft: - south;`.of NE; 4th• St. 'along' Queen Ave. eaten; R-342-79 sion between, Greenwood' Cemetery,on,-'west` and City property on east.. . MOVED''BY'"'PERRY•, 'SECOND •SHANE,, ADOPT,:AS •READ..-- Councilman Stredi cke. ingi.1i red,-.re covenants anit:'access being advised by Engineer ` l Houghto'n;,-tha-t'.by' consolidation pf`parcels the.access is gained. MOVED' BY,;;',PE•RRY, SECOND'=SHANE `-ADOPT; TiiE'•'ORDINANCE AS' READ.: "ROLL 7. . CALL: •6-AYE, ONE 'NO -'STREDIC1 E,.,"-'`MOTION'•CARRIED. First Reading', he`Waysnatid:Means •'Comr ltt a=tretonimended:'first 'readi.ng' of. the _ fol 1owin0 'ordi nances;` c, ._. Self Storage'':,Ordi,nance' read-'amending Title'k"IVfy'Ci'ty :Cade'.to provide for use Facilities of self.-storage 'faci'li ties''to be7,.allowed „by Special Permit. MOVED• BY CLYMER, .•S.gC•OND Si1INPOCH ''REFER-ORDINANCE BACK TO THEN:: .t •': WAYS AND' MEANS COMMITTEE: CARRIED. 'Councilman: Stredicke..noted' ,' • • the ordinance-Was n 'retP oa,cit 1;ve. r:; ' •' . Ordinance '#3332 _ Ordi:na ce"read `author 'ng 'aoqui.is:itithi.:pf-:property ,and prov-idi Ac ui s,i ti on -of. for a ri `,a u ` h ri C;i A nq. , q p yme t,; , ut o;. i nga::.ttie;, , 3!' #torrie r,,'tor, prepare 'condmenati or; r'`, . Cedar River..:Trail pe,tit on far''..acqui;s'iti'on`for:'.eonstr fiction. of Cedar River Trail "'' Properties -': system.•'•.•MOVED` B` STREbI C1 E .5E'C ,ND',SN:INPOCH:, SUSPEND RULES AND '' 't:. ADVANCE 'TO rORDI FINC ' T0: SECOEb` D: iNAL" RF 4DINGS. CARRIED: Following .readi ngs"`authori-zingg actin's •t `on.':o.f ' +addad/Jordan/LaRue properties; 'it""wa MOVED'•BY_'sSTREDICKE. :SECOND'^SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE L" AS READ r j),A0LI';CALL0'-. ;,;5-A Y E:.',iSHINPOCH •TRI'MM, CLYMER, . . . PROCTOR_ ; STREDICKE `M%(;-N© S•H E `ANA',..PERRY:''•';' MOTION CARRIED.' to . 3 _ 7 7 r , t- rYVN, S,l iN ORDINANCE NO.333 AN ORDINACE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON' CHANGING THE.ZON= . Affidavit of Publication ING-CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPER- , TIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM STATE OF WASHINGTON GENERAL CLASSIFI- COUNTY OF KING ss. CATION DISTRICT (G) TO RESIDENCE DIS-.. TRICT (R-3) R-342- 79/NUNN WHEREAS under Chap- Te r,E r cl....h lAG1:S.t» being first duly sworn on j ter 7,Title IV(Building Reg)-' I lations) of Ordinance No. of 1628 known as the"Code of oath,deposes and says that.•. lF .is the i rark General Ordinances of the ' - THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) City of Renton",as amend- times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and ed, and the maps and re- has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred ports adopted in conjunction to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- therewith, the property paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, hereinbelow described has and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained heretofore been-zoned as at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton General Classification Dis- Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the trict(G);and . Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County,WHEREAS a proper peti- tion for change' of zone Washington.That the annexed is a O 1. lt.lr/.c P... 3.3.3J.classification of said propor ty has been filed with the Planning Department on or about April 24, 1979,which petition.was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for as it was published in regular issues(and investigation, study and, not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period public hearing, and a public hearing having been held , yy II' thereon on or about May 22, of rL consecutive issues,commencingon the 1979, and said matter hav- ing been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and 6 day of J7 ly 19..79..,and ending the said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City day of 19 both dates Council having duly consi- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- dered all matters relevant scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee thereto, and all parties hay ing been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposi- charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 6.tii. s.4', which tion thereto, NOW THERE- has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the FORE first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent THE CITY COUNCIL'OF insertion. THE CITY OF RENTON, iat,ckeA.4,6)L_d WASHINGTON, AS O OR- DAIN FOLLL OWS:S: SECTION. 1: The follow- ing described propertydn the Chief "lerk City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence Dis- tri• al (R-3)-as''-hereinbelowi' Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6 day of specified;subject to-the find- inne nnnnh winnc a d M d I-----" ` • - - Sion dated May 25,1979;tfie 1979. July 19f 7 Planning Director is hereby _ Cfiarles . Delaurenti, I' authorized and directed to ``*Y.;.11.Mayor change the maps of the Appknidd.as toifrom: Zoning Ordinance, as Lawrencet9?'1arren,' Notary Pu is i and for the State of Washin47e,f_aedr/ n amended, to evidence said City Attorney residing at Kent,King County. i •rezoning,to-wit: Published in the Daily Re f See Exhibit"A"attached . cord Chronicle July 8,1979. hereto and made a part 1I-- - -Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June hhereof as if fully set forth 9th, 1955. 4 herein. t, (Said property being lo- I Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,750Isatedatapproximately (1 adopted by the newspapers of the State. I' 4thfeet South of N.E. St. along the Queen Ave extension between Greenwood'Cemetery„ on the west and the City of Renton property on l • the east) V.P.C.Form No.87--, - --- I AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive',Covenants ex __ __________ ecuted by Petitioner-owners on or about June 1, 1979 and recorded in the office Of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving.No. 7906180679 and which said Covenants hereby incorpo- rated and' made a' part hereof as if fully set forth. SECTION-,II: 'This Ordi- nance shall'be effective up r on its passage,approval and five.days,after its publica- tion. PAAED 'BY THE' CITY COUNCIL this 2nd 'day of v. I July, 1979. Delores A. Mead,iCityClerk 4P-pR9VED BY THEJ r '.\ y Jy I/ e 4.. , w ritN .E' yI' et6n. <' i G o.iT (7 ( y.. 7rxT . Itt :N Reservafi a. f.1 sir •ptl(00 () f i 1t 1 3[ 1. ....;:t t.•• , r p = W h •e r•O x L. 1.. i iY NA11 .1rXt it r r 40r17 J r t Z 4 .3 ___._-_—.._ y y ( p J y rJ;J ; xc t TM st st 7; Eli; ie Ci Hc..y r,t i, g N[1ITN < t :It.q`i z 1 l•y t.,• t - w N t 4 2 W 4 10 W a< Mtrt WStIIrE.'s 03- .1..ri.., J Y... $ 9 Avf 1• < IJ{ , t.. 2q2 ZS31.Ii ZI;. % °* 1 -hr 1 >ihfiPn%t ` S~ t' N[ 11TN di rZi r N nN' r = SCHO Y I•'14T,X TT • f: O tali ST 1 N_ST ' f r' V j < (1TN Cf <11TN > 4 f_ 0. r NE--1--__•.sr O tt fT IA 7111 t( 4 - '" ri CNLt` It4 'FI.r . w.l J 1IITH IT 1t• A ® Q N1• r,•i! N, [____!_OTN,1 7 TN t I 6 n• IDTM FL R = AlnittK j IIT.- RT Sr f, . e NORTH PINION N(f, hf ~ YN 10fN x O I fiNO w 'J 1NTZRCH Ntrf P• a r `[ M ^^ I[ Ifr sr ` I + PVbIr. es 1QtN K TY rZ IOTN ER s HE AOTN iT V • T tit IOTN 7T , 01H t 7 *' IIfTN yl N[ tali . _ < t R[ tOTH sT <{, teai' t.. t•Vwlt flilk rj MLr171TTro >7 1 AIRCRAFT °L2 4TH QAE C Z w 2 O N[ 4fN ST I" trrc .t 1 1f' IT t I r ar z rH, O T T V Y tTtM IE t MTN? ` •1 PO•r,+ t _ « N. 5TH 'Sr w iiz Sh t W v z i r`t ,H y CI w UtMITSsdSv0SlalgntimHr c r. i \'\2r s l. p D pT Nt Y Z 7 ,a. L••1•.sltx c t4TN aT100_, 11 y Porr•,.. xs i 11 J r I' r. M 1?ON[Y Q[W 1 s . d ( Sub 5!,Ion = \ • t.. ..... . 1 h tr. r . a W i o • < Id t i !•,j r [ t[r[[NTaRv { z I'' N 3 rMgr i ii•ITTN ttL CD r xt < Tl _ t4 tom 1 NIONI NDS sTM S t ' ME TIN <. sr 1?t ST TT e tl INDUSTRIAL -AREA y Q c"7 trot Nt TTN • Sf 7T r r sct+ooL b t It.rTtt I 1. 1< a IT 4t 7r:• 1t I I 1`` O s. 0 ro[ 7TN +I,tCj ow O < 1t F F WIN 7Tw IT ; PO•ell i1 x MC se:tb. WQ t1tO 3' i/ ft p('i W Ir[a 0••1..•:"7 It S R RENTON I.SYD•Slatan i' I S 4tt.-` i YJ r N( • LTA a P A. K< w < i; r MUNICIPAL t r ht ft..ar L 4 1 >Z roe A .. y AIRPORT 1 r^eTN MC t. Id! r N 4 rr {TN • !T O .[ r. SE f7,iw In C i CT d}t f, 21N ' r+.s.O.:w' 1`(ri; J 9 1 T- I-a 1T t ro to r4 r Z cr-t) "'.. TT 3 A ISSTN ST1 WO ç-'\. s iTN K 9 I IL 1. r Z •`t 2 w 1, r f +ram Y fqr 1 1 U\ 1:1 x tali .. _n FOUNDRT t / v ,.:/ eFt • ` 5fT' •' r Rcrrt y s i i ST D' `J I •RM23.4 S Z 1/ lit-, w,r••a 3'VOC.TI rN. 7 f f) NW nknod r t v e t; . z Hsrc. 9 10 r 1 / i tf' 7 97.>, lTN iT Ti 121TH IT h~ S [ itfO1Y\ 4 V NOV4iR TN .sr,,+,E ` at its / 4T 1(rm-y._ ja 7 R'I I 1 7 n afn < sr r.sT n t aL 2 I e16 15 ! FXa T, v/~ w tT. fT CFN BERI j`., t--? w r 1' i 15 Md•••t• '•r-:{ J al t I CnnD 1 .t-v It I ma. i tom v.1 y,D i I • 1 4y c [1 < s 1, R 1 I _ ar,..,n:.T GCCt/tTCFC:1 a. CptItSERCE,_ P"f h ?! o tG19 T 1 VVn:T x1 r• i, jf ;' 3 o N 0-- teiCALYN 41E0 • SnuD lrt- L%j . • 20 r z I t SFr F'a"' iT A e CitNIC qc x :.3 ,,`Y'", 7 ` 7 r 1e L 1.=N• TT / t 1,-•.l Le • 20 s nrt eo Tt WAT z><O IT r t w — _ 7 ,.. 6 I 9 Cwtt ! T.' ar'—' rt7' ! a 6 JT':rntetnn •n ti t tlanr 1 as u! 1 3YD.Yt Te -lzer a pr. lKV l r St CJ .T 1 / Ay JI ! J. w.. lie t Hf•fe c 1 # Ls•r1 4 aT T}• L I 1C 1 0 ST iT r, tr q l M' { tfaP flf• 1d1g1 I 1 P.11 7MTN > T- b T+..E".T.7 7r 7,'; < fly lk i,:''• r y 4.;1 1 V:,rMr st r 7cT9<Li• y i( 1 ^ 1 i 5{ 7riTN St I71rro ; f RZnTt?n < 7 1,...,•* i,tl,,v l r 3T w ST n f itr 11f1 r sm.N12roa 1 ,vs' 4. •Ill I>4„ r Pit I A. 1 h11222,z TI is iT7 a• f ! 17.2: 0;+• NAPt,E VALLEY T It 1SSTN IT SC C e 1xTH T Z:.,r Ir 21 • it i w 1 CITeLItAITS Ti'Aj L ? 9_1r!r17 11 •t tT tM S o, Pt t' Y 0 s F7t!w E 1 S I C t rc S r aw Lit L%,. er®w .>,- r" , (n Y< 4./ / t 1>nµ•tr* ft ' Fr JT rt V q M I. S It tfr w St fir Ct - aT N Q 1 ( 1.. i. r< • R ii i A:YTN ONY I [ IT f [TH IT ' u 1 I[ IaaTlti`.fTtt RENT \ySCttpOL r > 4 r Sr t p St9Y41 f Y :Ci: 41 Sf W Y Rchron h r ; t. r• v CLNTU z= c1 'Y r • iT rr < n. * f .1\ WI 4L 4-. 01i S< rtelf F w rt7 t" lZt t t .. TN w1T ^3 t '•t h • *r j, 1, f} I 1 • 14 ..., 3714 A r h 4T 14 a!•.lo IT 1 111 1, 4 W ! 1 • S f DarricatSe ING f QM liOP7/ifR x TM tT ht z ,[ti 7f f IPACI CCO4ST RAIL s t `` r4 z if o Z II c 0 • s ITN 1 J ' GM I" A'OAp,', Art` t. 11 J ! I $ f w - " 3. w 1 3 ` + / iF Az 17 16 t.., fZ 16 Li_arh a, `x Z a _t.f T, J q ye e 1 ski R t. 1_ A ww rxooD n, 1,OCIuhAOYSt i. . C. 17----------- _------,„._ I- 1 11- --_•,,,imum_ : ., or.4 4 _ __....„___ -. 71. 3 II vc2_,, L/ Th gairo, m. ..1mi,./.9,_,...J-.. 1 _ z i ii-: --,,,Aiib __ -..44dillf r'644wg.... AID •-75--i' 1 : 44•..*-- 4/ ilimograni--d: ..+, si : 1 1 OD A "Mariliiiiktra#if ' 1 MIIIIFINZ:ammilir -7#0, A---1 mom /Zig munvirif 1111. 1410 1,... ,wgz 1 .1 Ellilk.N/MU 1%11 iINEMM1111111 A Wu', • ill maw Ipar /1 i'A IN•mmoggp// n Ili07311"--- 1111111111111111ww" Asa. 14.101a..101110111541- ,, c)±; r_ O X WMII 1 I- 4 ! A .0 OM L.h._...,..• El-) m MPRIMIS 1° 17...mm... 1 il Mr-- 4:4,f- rarrisii, 7:40moral--- i::=- Eat iii psi, /..,,, ,.,,,:..7 , z,.4 re— iiia4l0ilk 0„.:.•.,.°.,. 1-:..-1..- l.. ia it4Irg1i‘ rl14i, rab11(6A013tl:, iI•„ A. i f, P, r,,'_a,,,„_... N-,., r'-:-,- I..P-.,.. l,.,(,.,,.,-- l"4-,•, lb,i,.b,,.",.,.,:,-,i,\ o.. A1.rma._m 1_WA i,, tr', n,, iwgM, d. f„, l_ a, e, O, lel.;,or- Ni m IIa.ItrmI. 6i. i. iNI s1r.. m. mI.mfmi,'l. I.I. a Txo.is7c 1 r P,, iixp... 1- r,oI . iiram i i -- 11 1 // rC 4 . / /I / IIIIIMIIIII 1 0 r-c . 1111111111-1111111,1,111 r v........ fa.„..,.... 4 I Ar ,_____ 1 ila T• aiha - -- e- re r- 411. .-- ----_-. 1-. 1. efid s( v 1/ 1c,,__ ip- my Ely moll. r, per- v-- z1 1 i WIT nt..•.. Pliallak 1 i. 1 I ' UM C A 1A6001Wriaizg)Illgeard: III Crah NI 7 1, 441 AVibig " we/ 4. 71- wo I., ,.,,, . r m...,....... k,,...,„.,,,.._,, ,. tr is... .... J... in 4" ii lig. Nor i 1 \,..„,„ in ea .,,.. ....,. mr ,, Ell----:::::::„:„:-„„;.---- - asaidmit. 774: 11-" IPI44 1511. 17,----- 7-fl- i4: Ll • glirP. I'''' 44in ;....,„„,,.----:-.:;.:.:,'-'"'": 4„... / .... I 11111111• 111116- .... inr ..... ..:-.-.-.. -:- -------------- i. i___,-- 1 6 L . gillifiggraPpri 1 mil ie g.. te 1 f 1111611111.11111ilr 0 11111 i* 1-- 1 I A I 41" i I 7A 1 T 1 L I i r., ,, ii c) ni f I 1 - t I I t A,S) i. a i N. 444i• S-r. (SE.. I25T11 ST.) eI1 i El z a o 8 p Ill I .. i 0 A 1 e O i I a il° I o ii I % i S I !7_1 JN1,I 11 1T•' ' V;o I v s is I..l— it R I • ® II IS [V L1 •e •. IIIII null 1- I I I. il•lllllllllll { L. V' I. H\\\ b• QENT04 VILLAGE P 1 inIIIIUr` ( imi ice..; 71111111111111. 11111 1 i• 06Y! : 1 ; fill-E.it A I\L 6, VI• Stk . .R__„_ inr i. *kis 4 .b" 2 a% ss, wite'.. ' l' Ell o , Illrli \\• • • i • 4R_3 3 W-- d "' 7 i1. :...9 1M1 at., ' ^ jJ a .: •-1.2 iniimi,sa'1_ may,_---I if' `Iw,- ]'A a Im If I cl ss / B-I • \ p rim lipzR-3 \am g e •sz r ppi I.40 . z. rF IIIIII I\ir .• if • 1. I I, 4'. i V 4 I A11 0Z G-9 . 00Io i• t .o 1 0 ` G-7200L— I i I e aneein I Ik 5tN sr. '• 1 41•4 4......• -1 the U AtiVit ••4j%SR I I n T. - I7. 121111 5. 27 i.Ir \ 6 7\ 7418. 211119 1 b re cr. , 41 14 . 4 4 '. li. y/YJ 49 V I G I.N•I Tr MA F Alb GAICE ! I''-/-ao' . VP FORTH I. Io Pu -r pRIv lam ' i 1 RI A 1+ 1• .. ,u .. ., I I 6...... 11I111111 1 I i III1IIImu I iIII1I ! C I101111IIg. ENTO VILLfGE PL 1 Q N'.11- ,,---%......,.1--' • _ IIII III/( ti j' IV ' - - - ,__ ---r-5------=''-="---=.1:-:---- -------- -----..._ -re=Milo A*I ii.rj/7----/.4-. rom '7..11 kli 11574 1.139110 g'.I I I\ •IIIIIIPPPIP. .w 111. r. rr Mit _,.. a:- ' 11.1112,1IPP I •-- ---- - ' -446 II . Y. II 1,ra 4. 4ICJ T. 00----- _..Hw7. . Ll as a '':, i 4'. _.• : FEMe 41 Ile s\ I h R 4_ y1 ,- _y- W T T --~ T - ,.'. d i,Ti %wilYv A. IeM T W-- d -- f• M 1 ,t v ,Ma 1 • 0 r 1 \ H - o .s •toal-- - i ° CO11@ s CI"7 7 . . - 1R .R.2 IM . .53 111Wilaaldrill. R Ws PPS 4 re ••v e l to 4 \an til ea Ft__ 74 .1I•i 3 '..1•211 • s, IS ,, eo• •-• 1 7NI .1 YY 0 4 e Q G-9 . 00 u I:‘I\ TI II u1121 a, fidifsisbiss + 12 lb 6, • D W , r!,! L. 1 11/, G.7200 1 27TM Q • 6 ` • ( A8y f . : I S*8 . L`[`q A s , J V I G 11 11 T` I/If_p GAL-5 : I I.'- Zoo' . . . • NORTH... 1TAP. AI rs, o PubT' pP IVY OF I?x If w ~ _ o THE CITY OF RENTO(N MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.ilIKI55 CHARLES J. ®ELAURENTI MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 235- 2550 iD9 TEo P SEPS • O May 9 , 1979 Josephine 0. Nunn 251 Union Avenue N . E . Renton , Washington 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G to R-3 , File R-342-79 ; property located approximately 900 feet south of N . E . 4th St. , west of Union Ave . N . E . , between Greenwood Cemetery and existing City of Renton property . Dear Ms . Nunn : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on April 17 , 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for May 22 , 1979 at 9 : 00 a .m . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y, ricksen Planning Director By: (La' d R. Clemens , Associate Planner cc : Terry L . Wolf , Project Coordinator Construction Monitoring Inc . 1101 Pike Street , Seattle , WA 98101 PROPOSED/FINAL ;LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE ,N—SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-342-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF•-462-79 a FINAL Declaration Description' of proposal Applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to R-3 for future development of either condominium or apartment units. Proponent JOSEPHINE O. NUNN Approx. 750, south of NE 4th, along the Queen Ave extension betw. Location of Proposal Greenwood Cemetery on the west and City of Renton property on the east. Lead Agency CITY OF REN'I'ON PLANNING DJ P1'. This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS [] is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after' review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : A negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared for the rezone only, and subject to further environmental review at the time of site development. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ' (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : z Responsible OfficialGORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title Planni • s ire` fr x' Date May 16, 1979 Signature '-g K .r,. City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : L- CT En Approved I 1 Not Approved Comments or conditions : , t 57-ANC= - $ s nn rJ-T— 7 e7.';-••11/"(%.'" (-- '. .(:;'/12_e,— 7 7 Signaturevof Director or Authorized Representative Date j REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 4g/ p :AProvedd _iO NotApproved /e ns 1C'C i i'-// j-L CC /CTCp,%fir:. /'-/L1-7/(/ .3' W)R: 7/11L-. i' ,; L—'/) A Cc ( .5-j d>//9 C (' /•w,i ;7;.L e_ /rti10 /`-171-7-'C:: Sc.l, (.,.c- it iicf-G- / • /cC(,/c- t.i 7 ) A '/ /sC!![-0iAr(. 2%i1. .S ,-;'C:: i :- i-`cam 7 r i. /'77.C<_:%') /I S rt rc' lr/J I ji i•-/;/,_ l1 tii.f .. '/,''C Y_-. /ice f/ c:•//L-- %'C4;•6((CC.e,,C"'ACT,-.'73 /1c./71-ChC: /;-t:!/C..0;4_ - .J-;;.,/)-G-,_ ,:`-/GL`% , s•' (. '‘'---- 7--t7------ Signature of Dir`&ctor or uthorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r71 Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : ML451 ti,/1J;, ,4A,04C.. —) G,Jh it_ i-_. c ti)C L PLAiu S C /Nr) 1.14Y //(.L NC=cCSSAC-T V::CeS ' As ":"U(1(fIC:00 , 01 / S(.1, l<- SY6 0+--, , J C 14.E'1 lr_'e2 ,-,'Frc4"-_ SYsze--, jam'—C-•i__ I) ' iP,V C VN.r r r '(i2...-1,Ju Acv,-- CiJ.1.'L<y.c , Signatu ''of Director or Authorized Representative ate ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : 2) Finance .Department _ 8 Fire Department Library Department 0 Park Department 0 Police Department e..‘_ .„---• Q.1 Public Works Department 0 Building Div. Cr Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descripti ( 0 Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee dAte ote dzf41,W DATE : Vefri PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : 05449144/& i9• I,10ed LOCATION :c . N. dafildah , /*64548r " A1196/ APPLICATION( S) : # itit/1 X 4 4 . R e- ffj2-* 7 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX II ER RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ELI Approved LJ Not Approved Comments or conditions : 2--(-1 d7 ole..5,617,17//0-4-- / 5 i,LC..rri-e.7,c-;/- • Signature ofof Die'ector- or Authorized Representative. Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . Department : 2:-/-" 1-/ c.i p : . ( 1...)-% ri Approved Lalfa 7Approved Comments or conditions : C,_, ___, d , fin4 c ,:i• :.f.: -.---7, f-- k,, p ..,,. ,„ p _____I. -1 ,_) , j -• ' . c/1 Signature of Director or Authc. .ed Representative' Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : e) -t ' I SIGNIFICANT I I NON SIGNIFICANT Comments . 79 e4A, G=- - T_"' Representativeve Date Signature of Director or Authorized Rep REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Tp- A FFr E l t 1 l ` SIGNIFICANT I INON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 47- 0/79 Signature of Director or Authorized Representati e Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Bliktd14c,-- SIGNIFICANT I NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department z. Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div. Traffic Engineering Div . fsiC Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee 04 79 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : oie-v Action Name : 4%41h' 1Y04 11 • 6i 6 40 11 e/o®o NPleasereviewtheattached . Review requested by (date) : V i Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ///CC 1 SIGNIFICANT I "ANON SIGNIFICANT f/j:"%/''' ' .2 7``-ice '/c''t-1 /`' O' Comments : '=4 - `- -i/r -/`- -,c - , l// G- //;''), /t;v //'i/ ) /ICc:.; SS' d'ii/3z.c, L7 Y,Ci 'C:/1 3z i0,('c'-v::"('/}" ; 7i/%, /041/4 %7/,2/G . JN J-;i",r_7 /?ram/ /-'/%?/G= c. . lC' /-,//. // /_7 /';/.L //`,-/:,/c_/A--/ S c 1 1 /`—ICC / /c_C' C"c--///c `-'/ ',L-' S Ci/— i/ /c:C-%"I %'% 7a. c'/r /U. l /( z---zr_— ri 1, Signature of Director or Authorized Representa ve - Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : LATiiLiY"v SIGNIFICANT N NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : 3\,f) GI,:,_ ___.-/.14---- V1/79 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date r.•rw.= i.7-ti '. 'sue-. i+.n a I 4i 1 •—••.i 7, 53 jZ i ..i L.a' .L..j LLB:,:•i'.','.l"4T. ,_. S_Ja• Ili:l ' L :,. 1). `. ,. ; Q.' j JJJL„' 1.-'-.1' 11•` ,'I;Vi '0-- ', 174-- <1., i .) ,,,://, ?! .ii: --.:• in------- - • I, ,...4... . ,- . ; _ ! i i-,' t i 1S`T l7Th7 r .1 ..G-700 w"` s ! ' d 1_ .1_l{ 1.1.1'1'' T4 J • r I .- '- 1-T , f, T• •+ E 7M AT. fl i\ 't..'+• '+ val °' I I •I ._. i'. - r f • y ,• IN O _ l'Ir •j, ' } 1., •• I N H. M'Plr } M` .. Ti 1 J 2._ f •.111-1 11 1 AZ o 7•I. Y 'Ilua.' .1'Lli I'•.__1 • .. r - 11 1 1 a a t1. l •• ... r ru.uc __: II JAL, t R= - 4t 3 ir 17 ; .1 R-3 4 19 3 I r' I 14 o I..__u L_- I` _.. 1 ' N E 4 TN 9 T I. d fll/ IJ ? I A^ F V W! 1 I,} 1 ir lt r 1—_ f 1VV`. j" GREENWOOD }— "18t. .iiiii.:- . . . _.t.: . R-j L.. e Su4TE'CT i SITE i r laera:, /1 • I I 1 4., .G T 1 ri S R— l 1 i JOSEPHINE 0 . NUN,N R-342-79 1 APPLICANT JOSEPHI 0NEt(l1Nf= TOTAL AREA ±3. 13 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS 30'" wide unimproved road extending westerly from Union PRIN Ave NE 1 t EXISTING ZONING ( IGtt ,. General Classification District I 1 Undeveloped; Single family residence in southeast portion , EXISTIN,G USE the site PROPOSED USE . Future use as condominiums •or apartments , T Greenbelt, Commercial Medium Densit COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN 1 e am_ y i COMMENTS 1 1 f 6L- tii€, I0 „ SP14° Z9V- - - NNf7A1' 0 371, 111, 1_ DSO. 0 ' P.- 1.• 1. 14) Av•- 171, g JAgri3475 t: 9: 1, pOOZ* it pp/. 770, S• t% Z••. z: Ihr. r. 1 I , 01, 4, Optelli. 11Pr I I.. am. oni. M. • •••• I 1 ( I 1[................ I I I I I I I 1 I 11 i I 1 II 1 VC% 11 fitz I r- . II I' I 1 .....• ft.. 1, I I ftal 1.........••„:, f;. 6:... 70. 7... 1..,...,... 4....... 2............... zz...............-_‘........ I I 7,'‘ n '''), 1 U126 I L 1, 1- - 1.,: i 4•), 1 — — i 1.„..: 3 I, 0 , I. :;"' ' 4J1''..' gh, fl\ cil I f 0. 0' 6 . n •''-' 1 1 ... ''' ,,? .,.., '.' , 0 k I I;, 0 iE= 1: 11= I = I 125 EMI ICI C= 1 klIII IIII 1311 EMI KZ= Val ME 111.'.:' 1 CIO IMO 11111 ICI CM MEI MO ASIMI MC? raCD• 7,,- D,, 014,- 45" r.-:--„,,, L,, 7' W--- 0,.' TT 4 . 1,;-'-'" 2-''''-. il'''' . i - PI , , p,' 31. 1 '''' tczi 1 I, 0' 1 q' ii.:'. 9 ii J ,,‘, + 4 no antra asszs i' , j1 o ))* v.: '')) . 1 ', - 1 ; ' t: 11;, ‘ .,.. ,,,-•:,: i`. ri . 7). 01 h' t' 0• t.,iY WED td,,. ,,_ 4, 1,,,„,!,',, lbj,/, g, 0, I 16 r„ ..-„, Li' b 1411 will 0••••••,.. , we 0. 101. II I j r.........' k•% , i , ,,, 11, r,;., . it.,..:,....,:,:; i;„'.:, x I 1 0 i u z D- Sh£ 11:'' .' , r t- . 74. czsz— I\ i i„., 1 ., . ,,,,.,,, , , 4.. y ... -..,, e,. i • b . ,.. i;: . 1 • 0 isf 1 : ‘,.;•-;:,:.-.,:: 21.., 4•: :•••:, ,,• 14.[•,', i •• c•,.•;,„.,.,• kg' !-• ii t 1 . t•' 4: i' •''-' ' :,, , 4 - i :' ',,'! g 4 min 011• 11 MHO = MD 0 Ott?. ' ! , SI: 6 I r„, El 1 : e", ::•.„• . 1 v . C3 I ,11 ; 1..._. :.-. 4- Zh• 1 1. 636, 15- 01117 -, 9• Nt.01 C: I rj 1: 3 t. . 1 ....• 1 I'd ' ti.• t i I ' 1 CONCLUSIONS: 1. 'The proposal generally brills to the,Corhprehensive Pla ection 4-3014. (B) ) except for access. Adequate access should be provided site prior to development of the site. Perhaps the most appropriate and expeditious solution would be to incorporate this needed access into the development of adjacent properties. However, access becomes critical relative to actual development, not the reclassification. Adequate access to_the' site per applicable city requirements must be provided. This can be reviewed during review by the Examiner of the development site plan. : . 2. The area immediately surrounding the property .is undeveloped despite the B-1 zoning to the' north._ Low density tingle family zoning (G) directly abuts-the B-1 zone without benefit.of,buffer or transition. Some transition or buffer is necessary between the two zones at the subject site. .,This would' be the appropriate use of land use principles.,. ." and the ". . .coordinated'development'of undeveloped areas." (Summary, page'9; Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, July, 1965) . Otherwise, potential multi-family and/or commercial development might be ". . .of incompatible uses which would. ..prevent the development of orderly growth patterns." Objective No. 1, page 17, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . R-165-78 Page Three It was stated that the' B-1 property north of and adjacent to the site is proposed for development of 220+.multiple family dwelling units. Three development plans were not submitted or required, but Section 4-711 (B-1) and 4-709.B (R-4) allow a building height of six; stories or 95 feet. If such height, is not in fact proposed, even the density above' requires transition to the low density single family G property. Medium density multi-family (R-3) can provide this transition if appropriate restrictions are placed upon the rezone. The R-3 conforms to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designationfor •the subject site. The property south of and abutting the site is also _designated to possibly be R-3; however, until it is developed beyond the existing single family use, it should be considered as single family (G) property. 3. The adjacent and easterly city-owned property (undeveloped) is compatible with R-3 zoning. Buffering is not required along this portion of the subject site. Normally the R-3 zone rear yard setback is 20 feet and side yard setback is five feet (Sections 4-709.A'. ,. B. , and D.) . This appears insufficient .when the abutting property is G. The setback along the south and west portions 'of the site should therefore be enlarged to- 30 feet. Furthermore, the building height should be reduced-from 60 feet to 35 feet, that height for single family development, in order to complete the transition and buffering. Review of the site plan by the Examiner in a public hearing is appropriate for final, review of compliance with this and other conditions. 4. Existing vegetation', particularly the substantial trees, should be retained as much as possible to contribute towards resolution of storm drainage problems. Drainage and vegetation retention can be reviewed with specific development plans. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the recommendation of the Examiner that the City Council approve the reclassification from G to R-3 subject to: 1. Provision of adequate access to and from the property per applicable city'ordinances and regulations. 2. Retention of existing, vegetation as much as possible. 3. Building setbacks of, 30feet along the southerly and westerly boundaries of the property. 4. Building .height of 35 feet. 5. Review of the development site plan `by the Examiner in a public hearing for compliance with the aforementioned conditions. ORDERED THIS 15th day of June, 1978. j L. •ic reeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRAMGMTTTFn THTS 15th day of June. 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties IV H1:1'ARTMI:N7 1II1ARY REPORT HEARING EXAMINER. MM,I c HEARING: STANLEY E. STONE, FILE NUMBER R-1G5-76, REZONE i.'r 30 , 1978 GE THREE 4S;."1:•., v`,” rj'1 L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW. 43.21C,; a Declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal. This declaration is based on provision of suitable•development procedures and standards. tr M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION° A vicinity map and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Department. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Department. ,- 3. City of:-Renton Traffic Engineering Department. 4 . City Of 'Renton Utilities. Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 0. STAFF ANALYSIS: 1.;' The ,proposed rezone to R-3 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map element which designates the site and area south of' the site as medium density multiple family- residential . 2. The proposal is generally consistent with existing zoning and land uses to the north (i.e. . fl-1 zone. proposed apartment complex, and existing business uses). 3. 'Although the prbposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map Element, the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, 'Residential , page ii, states that "convenient access to major arterials and highways is important".. .The purposes and objectives of the;comprehensive plan, streets and arterials also states that "street patterns compatible with and complimentary to the general land use plan.." should be considered. . The subject site appears to be land locked without proper public access. No consideration of access has been addressed'. in the, application. 4. It is possible, with the development of an access street to the east to connect to Union Avenue N.E. that sufficient access will be provided to the site. However, from the. information that has been provided, no access is provided to the east, north; west, or south. 5. It is not clear how utilities will be provided to the site. If they are to be provided from N.E. 4th Street, they will need to be extended the entire distance across the proposed apartment complex property north and adjacent, to the subject site. if they are to be provided from Union Avenue N.E. , they will need- to be extended across City of Renton property or the We'hrman property. P. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the apparent access problem that exists, R-3 zoning may be approved only if suitable public access is assured. This could be accomplished by dedication of norther' 30 feet of the subject site together with similar dedication on the adjacent properties to the north (proposed apartment complex), east (City of- Renton property), and north- east (Wehrman property). Such rezone is further subject to the following conditions in the form of restrictive covenants running with the land: 1. Site develcvment approval. Specific site development plans including site plan, landscape plan, building elevation design, and parking and circulation shall be reviewed and approved by the Hearing A . 'ner. 2. Existing evergreen trees shall be preserved as much as possible and incorporated into site design, development, and landscape plans. No such trees shall be cut or removed without approval of the Planning Department. Detailed landscape and open space plans shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of site devleopment review. 3. All utilities shall be provided per Public Works Department approval comprehensive utility plan at the time of si' • development. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO TH.E HEARING. EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JOSEPHINE 0 , NUNN , File No : RT.342.79 MAY 22 , 1979 PAGE FOUR property north of the subject site , If they are to be provided from Union Avenue NE , they will have to be extended across City of Renton or other properties . 6. The ; Fire . Department indicates that all hydrants and access shall be installed and serviceable prior to any building construction . Hydrants and watermains shall be installed per water engineering requirements and future structures shall meet the , Uniform Fire Code for occupancy type . See other comments . ' 7. The Utilities Engineering Division notes that water and sewer plans will have to be approved and hook-up fees will be assessed . See other comments . Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the apparent access difficulty that, exists , R-3 zoning may be approved only if appropriate direct public access is assured. This can be accomplished by the applicant providing dedication and improvement of a public street with 36 '—curb-to-curb width including curb , gutter, sidewalk , street paving , storm drainage, and street lighting at a location to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments. Such rezone ,.is . f_ur:ther subject to the, following conditions in the form of restrictive covenants run- ning with the land : 1. Site development : approval . Specific site development plans including site plan , landscape plan , buildinel.evation design , and parking and circulation shall be reviewed and approved by the; Hearing Examiner. 2 , Existing evergreen trees shall be preserved. as :;much- as possible and incorporated into site design , development and landscape plans . . No such trees shall be cut or removed without approval of Ithe' RlanningDepartment. Detailed landscape . and.. open space plans shall be approved by the Planning Department at the time of site development review. 3. All utilities shall be provided per Public Works Department approval comprehensive utility plan at the time of site development: 4"r I e PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE.., HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : JOSEPHINE O'.' NUN'N , File No:' R-342-79 MAY 22 , 1979 PAGE THREE 3. Schools : The ..proposed- multiple family development would increase the school population by app.ro:xima.tely 23 students 25 student/unit) . ' These new pupils are likely to be scattered throughout the grades and, not significantly impact existing services 4 . Social : If the rezone is granted , future development will provide ,increase opportunities for social interaction among the area residents 5 . Traffic : The proposed use, would increase traffic in the area by approximately .57. trips per day based upon a maximum allowable density of 94- u'ni is in t"he , R-3 zone (6 . 1 trips/unit times 94 units ) . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION,:' Pursuant to the, City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a negative declaration of environmental impact. has been prepared for rezone , only , ' and subject to further environmental review at the time of site development. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . - City of Renton Building Division .. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City ' of 'Renton' Traffic Engineering Division , 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5. City of Renton Fire Department . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed rezone to R-3 is consistent with most of the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan except for the greenbelt portion in the westerly section of the site corresponding to the powerline right-of-way bisecting the site . 2 The proposal is generally consistent with existing zoning and land uses in the vicinity (i .e . R-3 , B-1 zone , newly constructed apartment complex and existing business uses to the north ) . 3 . The Stone Property immediately adjacent to the north was rezoned to R-3 by Ordinance #3247 of September 22 , 1978 . The Wehrman property to the northwest and the Swanson property to the north wer' rezoned to B-1 at the same time . The Examiner' s 'conclusions and recommendations are attached . 4. Although the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map Element , the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report , Residential , Page 11 , states that "convenient access to major arterials and highways is important. " The purposes and objectives of the comprehensive plan , streets and arterials also states that street patterns compatible with and complimentary to the general land use plan . . " should be considered . The only apparent access to the site is an unimproved 30-foot wide road extending westerly from Union Avenue NE. This would not meet City of Renton requirements for direct public access . The applicant has not addressed this matter in the application . In R-165-78 the Examiner stressed in Conclusion #1 that "Adequate access to the site per applicable city requirements must be provided . " In his recommendation , the Examiner made this one of his conditions of approval for the rezone . It would seem reasonable , therefore , that this and the other conditions would be appropriate for the subject request given the close proximity to and similarity of circumstances to the Stone rezone. 5. It is unclear as to how utilities will be provided to the site . If they are to be provided from NE 4th Street, they will have to be extended the entire distance across the apartment complex PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER , PUBLIC HEARING : JOSEPHINE 0 . NUNN , File Noi °R-342-79' MAY 22 , 1979 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : The site contains a significant stand of -Douglas Fir in the eastern 2/3 "s of the property with the; remainder lawn grass . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Wate-r : No water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land Use : The site is primarily undeveloped except for a single family residence in the southeast portion of the property . The Greenwood Cemetery is located to the west and the Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park to the south . Scattered single family residences are to the east and an apartment complex to the north . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERTISTICS: The area is in transition from scattered single family uses and undeveloped land to multiple family and higher uses , F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water. and Sewer : An existing 12" water main is located along NE 4th Street and a 16" main extends south on Union Avenue SE for approximately 750' . An 8" sanitary sewer is situated on NE 4th Street and a similar pipe is located on Union Avenue SE extending south for approximately 450 ' . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue SE within 4 mile of the subject site . 4. Schools : The, subject site is located approximately /. mile south of the Honeydew Elementary School and 14 miles southeast of McKnight Junior High School and one mile southwest of Hazen Senior High School .!. 5. Recreation : Kiwanis Park is approximately 2 mile north of the site and Windsor Hills Park is within one mile to the west. G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS -OF. THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-709A, R-3 , Residence Multiple Family . 2 . Section 4-729 ,.. ",G" ,: Residence Single Family. , H . APPLICABLE SEhIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : . 1 . Comprehensive Plan ,. 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , page. 18. I . IMPACT 'ON THE NATURAL OR. HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 , ' Natural Systems : ' Rezone of,, the:,subject site ,.will not have a direct impact: ,,:,However , future development of the site will disturt existing soils , increase storm water runoff, remove vegetation , and have an effect On traffic and noise levels in the area . These impacts can be mitigated through proper development controls and procedures , however. s .fir 1.,:,: 2 . Population/Employment: The proposal would inc-rease ' the population by, approximately 236 persons (2;.,5... p.er, s,o,n,s/uni t. ,times 99 units ) . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 22, 1979 APPLICANT: JOSEPHTNE O. NUNN FILE. NUMER : R-342-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant, requests approval of a rezone from G to R-3 for future development of either condominium or apartment units . (Site development maplattached. ) B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : JOSEPHINE O . NUNN 2.. Applicant: JOSEPHINE O . NUNN 3. Location :Approximately 7501south of NE 4th Vicinity map attached) Street along the Queen Avenue extension between Greenwood Cemetery on the west and City of Renton property pn the east . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Depar'tment . 5. Size of Property: 3. 13 acres' 6 . Access : ' 30 ' wide unimproved road extending westerly from Union Avenue NE 7. Existing Zoning : G" , General Classtfication District minimu011ot size 40,000 square feet lo ; 8. %0ExliSting Zoning in ' the Area : G" , General Classification District B-1 , Business Use ; "T" Trailer Park ; R-L Residence Multiple Family', minimum lot size 5000 square feet . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Greenbelt , Commercial , Medium Densit Multiple Family 10. Notification : The applicant' was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on May lt, 1979 and posted in three places on or near th site as required by City Ordinance o May 11 , 1979. C , HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the Cit0y Ordinance #2249 dated June 22, 1966 . , The existing G zoning was applied upon annexation . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND 1. Topography : The property rises from west to east at approximately a 5% grade. 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) : Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development. NO I I CL UI PUBLIC I ILIIIZ I NO RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEAR1NG WILT. BE HUD BY TUL RENTON I ANU USE HEARING EXAMINI.R Al HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MAY 22 1979 , AT 9 : 00 A. M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . WILLIAM SCHWARTZENBERGER, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-4 , File R-339-79 ; property located at 601-609 Shattuck Ave . So . between Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and So . 7th St . 2 . ARTHUR D. GUSTAFSON , APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS , File E-347-79 ; property located on west side of Union Ave. N . E . , approximately 200 feet south of N . E . 10th St . 3. RAY I . CRAWFORD AND ROD T . CRAWFORD , APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM RENTON SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM TO ALLOW PERIMETER LAND FILL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON LAKE WASHINGTON , File V-351-79 ; property located at 5117 Ripley Lane No . 4. FREDERICK R. BROWN , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO R-3, File R-336-79 ; property located on corner of N . E . 11th St . and Kirkland Ave . N . E . , east of Sunset Blvd . and west of Lynnwood Ave . N . E . 5. FREDERICK R. BROWN , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL BUILDING ( DENTAL CLINIC ) IN R-3 ZONE , File SP-337-79 ; property located on corner of N . E. 11th St . and Kirkland Ave . N . E . , east of Sunset Blvd . and west of Lynnwood Ave.. N . E . 6 . JfifSEPHIME 0. NUNN, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-3, File R-342-79 ; property located approximately 900 feet south of N . E . 4th St . , west of Union Ave . N . E . , between Greenwood Cemetery and existing City of Renton property . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT TILE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 22 , 1979 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED May 11 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 9th day of May 19 79 • SIGNED a 4 . RTY GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY1LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET SOUTH OF N . E. 4TH STREET, WEST OF UNION AVENUE N . E . , BETWEEN GREENWOOD CEMETERY AND EXISTING CITY OF RENTON PROPERTYi LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF U Li c 1 G TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON MAY 22, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9: 00 AM A.M. P.M. CONCERNING ITE Vl REZINE FROM G To R-3, FILE No : R-342-79 SPTT. PERMIT f SITE ,r P ' ROVAL WAI \ ER SHORELINE t ( A . A• G .. E. ENT PERMI1 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 101111411 CONSTRUCTION April 19, 1979 MONITORING, INC. City of Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Rezoning Application on Behalf of Josephine Nunn TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed lis a Rezoning Application for 3.13 acres of land situated on Union Avenue. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, 7'onr y L . wo Z Terry L. Wolf Project Coordinator TLW:mb Encl . FdS% R FCf_I E+"o APR 24 1979 k4,14,0 DEP 1101 PIKE ST. SEATTLE, WA 98101 206)682-8741 RF 703 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage?X YES- MATUr Fie f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:Subject to the denisty and design and consistent with normal procedures. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X V- MAYBE NU- Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X VET- MAYBE NU Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YET- MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical X site, structure, object or building? yrs-- MAYBE N-0-- Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful ack of full isclosure on my part. t Proponent: , gned) name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the -proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES M YBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES M YBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NU— c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x _ YET— NY N 0 d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YET—. MAYBE TU— e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YET— MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: Traffic generated by an additional 6n-70 units which are planned for this site. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE WO-- b) Police protection? X YET— MAYBE o— c) Schools?X YES MAYBE N0 d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES M Y'BE NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X Y S MM YBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require Xthedevelopmentofnewsourcesofenergy? YES MAYBE NO-- Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? X YET— RATITE NB b) Communications systems? X YET— MIT N- c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO