Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA82-024I bad_-- ----8Z.
I ( TEROFF ICE M E M(. _ CITY OF R 6:[TON
OC i 2 4, 1990
CA Cd_ o. DATE: lO 2`E-' 7b
i'iY CLERK'S OFFICE
i
FROM: h c-Y--- ihl-j-
c----1
7/
Q/p(,j- a)e 2-7- -
U E-Uyc t
SUBJECT:
Citi ii /
6- ----
tea d a- -1 S o--,„ -a_.e, 1
4-(,-d.
J V
a - A t- j
E-D -fzw 19 82 el S,c„e"
ri--ra„,___k 41.. .-
Ltit_, c,,,_),-Ii_d 1„.-c—J.. q_ c.„.1.=_.„_
cl,,G432.0_,0
q--LA---7—k. 0_,,v___„„_k_ FL/p..1_4 790 ,
ia ue ,_
fr
6/°
J
k , CI-
6
R 6
a—cLac ice- -
L..
I)
I( - T- E R O: F F ICE M E }J
CITY OF RE TON
n_
OCT 2 4 1990.
TO: 6:247--A__- C _ec_. DATE: I O - ZLt- 5-0 2,
RECEIVE
c:ITY CLERKS OFFICE
FROM: i `
72 y• P--(,t-----.HPA31 Pl,()
I
i
SUBJECT,: f. z
L-4, s a
C4 fie. 0--,Lo.71._./
d.( 6--e-- 98 2, -=1S 990 GZ a
v
1S a A 19 ---tit • n'' 4-13a-
r‘
r?I 1
4,0 c:.,,
0— 1 Vie- —r2' -4',• s / ..--c,1 Cr _ CS
1 I
bBEGINNIN II
OF FILE
FILE TITLE i(jinW -- -•
1.1
40000M111
I
4180,dIMINEEMMIll
I
c ,;(„,e‘ . F : LpIED
0
OS
1
I .: ° .4if .
li
z.--,
1 (---
L.
if, L-49- 1
V,e-. :,) XL
11 42-6, /
j
19
x2i)j 6- ea_44
I I
i
I
I
355.1
iiE3 __ ._'Z/
O
Q
GS]
o
325.n
3/
rc 14 0.67,
v '`
CI
OFLE
aFH
itI. ,2....
Earl Smit w School Distrlc 3
a
et
2.67 Ac. 0.6I Ac. Wl> 7.36 Art MARIii61aNY912
Is.) 1
0 11 M
t7.32Ac.
GUILDINnor.
s6
O
Q oll
V tvivl i DEPT.0.41 _
I R ENT tN
6i• • -
I- (
L0-o ES 4r 6©
CORPORATE
L 1 M1 ,. 1 0---- —C W'Il,oms 1s'4.,3
2.37 C c •
o
4
0lIz ;;
T
1
webernosad
le".
1 J d9 ac.
1
FII1
I•o I.g ' ' _'
Acl ! ®
O
Ruth Vents
I
309.4.11
C.
Wiiliamg II '-'1
I 10 535 `
1
Donald E.
30
Ac. .
f
0i94
y
McW,lliams 0.
193Ac. A
19as1 '
309.44 e$a 14.di
i 6oE
ir
iiChgrlr;s I.by,Rucker Carue
1C
e J. David Jensenm
I.
C
T •
1
rnl
o 2L 121 Ac
I•?:Q
I'
C-
r_::
3
IrII2.
394c.
M
r 1
mnI ' .. 175 lJ Ib8 U6pj
JqDa
NIO1101.
1 a Jnsen 2s'
rrc ci4.90 a,.
soI
l a
b7.96.
q175a
susaJf+ I'y t^
Q V
cc% 11,W
Iw I
J
r1/ I
5
N O r.
iii
T^
ti H
1 0.3a' :` 1 01/4,
T
IN.
1!"INrii)
I
I
Q • Q I I ® I111 L rev
tr
1• Q
r /
1
a
el 0
1 ,
0.3a AC. 0.25 AC.
sl
7, I' o ZI
3 •
sJ
1 •
0 az
Bo
Iso
f[9r.
v.
Q X
WIIP" .......
uI Ij
0
CCCVI
21d,4] 31 rr g
l
I `'Z o 0
1,r I 0.71.4 o Ioo
4 $
S is s tt fg
I"T 1 r7-1..-s Psi_ 91.!2-
BOLL MAP CO PA NY0WINCrNc•ATT L E OR
REPRODUCTION INWHOLE200FT. • COP RIGHT KROIL Mqp COMP
PERSON USE OR
P4VIN
ANY, I N C. RESALE/S Pfi'OH/8/TED BY LAW.
Cou TT TAX LOT N
j4 :t t . .. ,. .. s
ue 1
1pl w `)
Y { 1
1.
J ' i
w
o-} !
r
t
r
4 '
A
Y i.-:41•
y . 4'. r
r _._ R .T r
I;'
wr 9 w ems.
1
G J`]i _ai I rIn
I
a
1.
I.
1 ' .G
J
i:.. t -
c'
I 1
r -,
I:\ ''. i
el,
1 I
1 E
r
L . '
1:; .
1II' i Y
79.i .i ( ' -JY.
7
I
r.-„--,-),:n : •
At -
H,
11
I k 1
i i
ink
t i j •
I , I I
1 1
1
x
4_. ysM.:jf a...,._
pnh
7.. . ...
I1
I
y a.I
1
i i
1
9 r-L),__it..), Ni_w_E_, ii_
MAR 19 1982
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
I
v.'s.'w.r.
l •
a.' rWQQ1121
z..r.raar
1:: -• ' .. " . . . .. • ' . ' ''' ..'. * .ANNVAm SVionoa Mar' CU464:
4r1,11Ai
II40 L4 ice.t•s 4111. a 4. w..P .y l+d
pr o fog I1,o Plus CI1w'a i .11117ry .S! ''
i
3•*u hQi via•lit h- 'N (r.,7ru.l• m,
Wm
nn
va.lo}Para If' <++r.t.*. aJ. ./w'+ra OtsCO HZ.r}v 46 e.. $cim
r++r ay.,
10i4
a9 5
74.1:
2jr.
TUT.- ril*
Y
I
q. •••tr; =
2".7!::
1 .. $,. . ... •
li-'.
t. . 1 i
CO
t=
1
i tt i
Illfff!l1111•
k 1 ._ ,, /.. ,
t!
r
Ill . "17:',.... o
xS t 14:[
i-., .
I. F ,
1, - T
Z .. i .,,,,_ _..
i..
y
1\\
e
Ali° .
l
ti' -',. .
1*.t, . 3 Ali; • •
i• ' . k-: -,i t\\\, \Ns
I ,
rz.:
14::
6, -1, .•
A
O E. TT f
11 L
e
wi-?^r.
1k--
i
4,
I
1
lri,
iM1C,
I•
7
c.
7.:.
VII • :/
k.„___________
A
4,
1.
1._ . , ...
31,_,..........,...—..--,--
7
I --
47—
L.
TC""
4--2-
11''
7 --
r-1 .
ily.
tj ...
Nit •.
6
O
t.
EV-
T.----
1 .
3:-•
t .
ifiii:
Ar44 •
Ft
lk
N\\ \ ' ILL..%
7-)
t .
1
te.
timm.-
01111111L72-
011=
11b. -
M0-
11MI:
111117..
mom • . -",
CZNirlit. . .
alia-
011•
011M
ellE1,
1111M1b ..
110.
t,__ __._
I \ \\•‘ \\\\
t" .
i -
t\
icc:\\\\-\--\\,`'—
I
4.:
it '
1 .:
111
1:
It
l'
11..
I ..
t.t.,
i
Iilliv
I
4
1 . ...:
61. .. :::•::: , .
T
va.
a.
f„
r
rV
I
l
iL' •'
3
f
itI
fl
yno
rI
II
1 , -
14 ::
t,,
H
k________________-
17 -
k_
c__________._ _________
I
s
1
o cj
t.
a
L
r
i'
7.
nr
1
Miv.
ism+
r
r
9ty...
w
a
rsl
a?".
N
f.
r
o.
lIgMn +
f .
r
an.
av,
ly +
rwt'.
rs
lr..)
u. +'"
b •
w
111
se;
e
Ys
rwF+
y
too."
Ree .
4tI
On *
M •
tbt
olgth..
Atom
tr+
il
111/PP.-
QaSTIONNAIRE ON PROPOSED ;,C...:TION
Your assistance with the following questions will be appreciated. Please ;Idvise', as to t:hi:appropriate items below, where seParace (discretionaryill or Ininisteria-1J21permits,licen-ses, certificaites,
agreements or Other entitlements for use regarding any of the items under
Jf, grou 3 arc •cqui-r d 6a a f rc equibite Lu OULa Llllli a 'uuituiclb allu/UL UL L:
upallcypermit. Your identification of 1) the item required, 2) the issuing c::nartment or agency,1) the department or agency's address .and 4) whether item's issuance is discretionary or min-isterial would be greatly appreciated. The department or agency may be district, municipal,county, regional, state or federal..
I. Zoning.
A. What is the zoning classification of the property? B,1, Business, Section 4-711
B. Is a slpe'market permitted under this zoning? Yes
C. What othe types of uses are permitted under this zoning? Banks, drug stores, hardware,
furniture, t; other retail Uses.
D. If there .re setback requirements, what are they?
Front: , e : RRear: No e Side: No' *Except i n side line is adjacent o residential district, then 1O' ,10' ,5 ftrespectivelyckw11areuirdasroEnvroE. tt erne •re ol1F s feet Spar Cing aRa ioaging PaTIUTHA itVhe 0iiissree`tig? See below and
attached.Yes. See 'hapter 22 of Zoning Code for details.
I. Discretionary eviews.
Are there revi ws far any of the following, if so, by what agency?A. Architectu e: No. (structuial per UBC)
B. Design: ;No. Except sign design by Building & Public Works Departments.
C. Landscapin : yes. Renton Building Dept. ; Building Permit Review 10 ft. min landscape
strip along public`rights of way.
p
1. Subdivision ;Pl. ns/Plats.
A. May a s.ibd vision plan or lat be required, and if so, under what circumstances?
No.
Provid-d no additional lots are created from what presently exist.
Utility AvatJa. il.i.ty. (All utilities must be underground)
From whorl arse the following, available and are any special permits required?A. Electric'it} . Puget Sound Power & Light Co.
B. Gas. Wash ngton Natural Gas
C. I•'ater./Sewel . City of Renton Public Works Dept. Design & Construction approval by public'Works Dept. (Ministerial) '
Environmental C.ntrols.
A. Control Typ s.
1. Air Qua ity. *
i
a. Sta ionary sou-Fee."Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (Ministerial)
b. Air quality maintenance/management plans. Same
c. Ind'rect source controls. Same
d. Traisportation control. plans. Same
e. Par ing management plans . Same ;•
f. Par ing permits. Same • NOTE: Air Quality isreviewedbyvariouscitydepts. as part of environmental checklist review required w/building permit.2. Coastli, e or shoreline. • Not applicable
3. Noise. No permit. , Just part of environmental checklist review
1 1:.:tll::.r'_'s tact L•: er::ise of judem.iant,
deli.h-r.r Lion. or decision.
l:ehc,i.ries a deL, rninar. ionoF whether there it; a conformity to applicable statutes , ordi-
nanc'_s or rl_s;•l alions.
4. Solid w st:e disposal: amity of Renton requires approv_ private disposal service to
commerc'al uses.
5, Water.
a. 'I:Ef uent quality. NSA
b. Sew r -hookup permit, Renton. Public Works Dept. Ministerial. Sewer system design
and construe ion must be approved by Renton. Public Works Dept.
6. Other - please list:
a. Storm drainage & retention/detention facilities design & construction must be approve
b. by Public Works Dept. per city code. Part of building permit.
B. To your know edge are any of the above required, but not prerequisites to the issu-
ance of buil• ing and/or occupancy permits? Environmental checklist review and determina-
tion of nega ive. impacts by ]environmental Review Committee is only environmental control
prerequisite to building permit,
C. May an envir•nmerctal .assessment be required for this project?
If yes, plea e attach an information sheet or set of guidelines on the procedure to
be followed. An' environmental checklist review is required as part of building p',ermit re-
view, upon eview of completed Env. checklist a determination is made whether oril not to
require an vironmental impact statement. I
Resource Conser ation .Controls.
A. Energy.
1. lnsula ion. City of Renton Building Dept. Ministerial Review per Uniform Building
Codes and W-shington State Energy Code.
2. He,-tt;in• .•Same
3. Lig'4i g.
Same
4. Coo'_ n'. .
Same
5. Strvct re orientation. Same
6. Gas: Same
7. Eleccr'city. Same
B. Water. Des.gn and construction to be approved by Renton Public Works •Dept.
C. Ocher -.'p i-ase list:.
I. Fire De•t. review & approval of fire flow adequacy and water system design
2.
I. hazard Control
A. Flood.
1 . Is the proposdAocation within a "Special Flood Hazard Area as de::i.griar d by the
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development? No
2. If the answer to "1" is "Yes.," please answer the following:
a. ha. the. community adopted the Federal Flood Insurance Program SG./ teat Federal
Fl•od insurance is required for construction. or resale financing?
I
b•. . 11 the community had adopted the Federal. Flood Insurance Program, which
pr•gram did it adopt - the "Emergency" or "Regular?"
c. W i t, if any, restrictions and/or requirements are there concerning (construct it.
nt th iI location?
B. Geologic.
1. Are there special procedures or permits because of land subsidence, landslides or
earthquakes?
Yes. T uniform building code standards for Seismic Zone .III
the allow: t'i'!• Ions. Please rC:iurn this nu,;:.,: ;:,,,,...lireinIh3nkyoufor .Ldi g us I nticaertug _h. . I o .c: q ,.t
the enclosed Se1t- ddressad stamped envelope to ;;e.
Sincerely yours,
ibis que3LLonnaive :gas answered- by For £..i,.iier iniorm'aLLion
contact :re at ('fri Adp.,nr Na.).
JrL,l7vdc Di rtora,.
Applicant BENNETT-MULTIVEST, ET AL
R-024-82FileNo.
Project NaTie SAME
Property Location North side of N. E. 4th Street
approximately 950 feet east of Union Ave. N.E.
HEARING EXAMINER: Date 7-21-82
I Recommendation Approval with restrictive covenants
6q I
ALLY
I I I
I i
II
1` j _ Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response
4 Appeal 8-4-82ADateReceived
Council Approval. - Date
IjI! Ordinance/ 7 `T 3 Date
Mylar to County for Recording
1 Mylar Recording
I# 1.;':.7P,. __r)L.- flW [p 1
i
I Remarks: . OCT 19R2
I
f3„ •
1 t
jr,vc .....
4....• _......1
I H
Y;
IFY
L pi1:9r(
8)3
GGby
2
j
I
I
1
full;:ii'•:;
J'
Y.
Ail.f'4Sa
a.a
y
1 :r
U.
Ey
i SIl1:
7 ' - ,,
1±•,*.._.,•t%S'+
t.'ir't$ wJ v''';iv'..:.+y` .,y"
OF '4,
16 0 THE CITY OFRENTONt%z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055
kiLL
MEM B A RBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
O I
co•
FRED J. KAUFMAN.
2351y/
2593
94,
SEPI N_"-
February 9, 1483
Members of enton City Council
Renton, Was 'ngton
Dear Council Members:
May I sugge that the reclassification of both the Bennett-Multivest property and the
G.M. propert, has possibly created the need to review the Comprehensive Plea, for the
Northea "u:drant. The Comprehensive Plan still leaves open two additional intersection
quadrant&fo potential community shopping centers If that is not your intended policy,
then re-revie may be appropriate.
The multiple shopping center provision already has led to a complicated review of the
above pr;ope ies and an unIfortunately combative attitude among those parties.
Clarification of the Comprehensive Plan in this area would avoid such complexities in the
future.
i;
If this office an be of further assistance in this matter, do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely;i
t1 1s
Fred J. Ka an
Land Use 1;He:ring Examiner
FJK:wr
0018E
cc: Mayor
City Cler
Policy'IDe elopment
II
it
OF R
r
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON
O
U `$ 0 Z
POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678
n — LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
9A O' DAVID M. DEAN,
ASSISTANT
CITY ATTORNEY
0 Q`
MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT1 CITYATTORNEYgTFoSEP1'
August 1 , 1983 ZANETTA L.FONTES, ASSISTAN I CITY ATTORNEY
6 n 11 ,cq C:f,'.-tcl ^'
I pa'i{
TO : Roger Blaylock.,' Zoning Administrator
i
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney AUG 2 1983
RE: Multivest Rezone. -
De.r Roger :
En• losed please 'find the Policy of Title Insurance issued
by First American Title Insurance Company re the above-captioned
master.
6211-
451s-eltit '
Lawrence . Warren
LJ' :nd
En 1.
I
Jacket - :orm No. 1402 170) ._
SCHEDULE A
Total Fee for Title Search, Examination
and Title Insurance $238.75•
Policy No. 71499
Am•int of Insurance: $43,000.00 Cover No. D-372865
Dat- of Policy: December 29, 1982 at 8:00 a.m.
1. Name of Insured:
MJLTIVEST, LTD. , a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50%
interest, DELBERT C. BENNETT and BETTE A. BENNETT, as to an
undivided 25% interest, JAMES L. MA^STADT and LINDA MAUSTADT, as to
an undivided 12.5% interest and CHARLES E. (MEN, as to an undivided
12.5% interest; as nominees for a partnership to be formed
2. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy
vested in:
MULTIVEST, LTD: , a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50%
interest, DELBERT C. BENN1 rr and BETTE A. BENNETT, husband and wife,
as to an undivided 25% interest, DAMES L. MPZSTADT and LINDA
MPST.ADT, husband and wife, as to an undivided 12.5% interest and
CHARLES E. C1EN, as his separate estate, as to an undivided 12.5% •
interest, as nominees for a partnership to be formed
3. The estate or interest in the land described in Schedule C and
which is covered by this policy is:
FEE SIMPLE ESTATE AS TO PARCEL A AND AN EASEMENT INTEREST ONLY AS TO
PARCEL B
1
Form No. 1402(1/70)g ?as I'; i + ItClALTAOwnersPoicy
j
Et 0/
4
L7,.YFormB— 1970
Amended 10i 17-70)
S AMER -
C
El;
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
ISSUED BY
fi st American Title Insurance Company
SUBJECT TS THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B
AND THE P 'OVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
INSURANCE OMPANY, a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown
in Schedule , against loss or dams'.- exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs,
attorneys' fee and expenses which t • . pany'may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred rby
the insured b reason of:
1. title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein;
2. any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title;
3. lack of a right of access to and from the land; or
4. unmarketability of such title.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, First American Title Insurance Company s caused this policy to be signed and sealed
by its duly a thorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A.
e` i c,
N r
s ' First American Title Insuranc Company
o.T
0•
I ,
13
BY PRESIDENT
g
WIPi§PEii 24,
I
i/£3
ATTEST
11
SECRETARY
KI?.+.F. .....
D i'
SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
THE FOLLOWING MATTERS ARE EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED FROM THE COVERAGE OF THIS POLICY:
1. ANY LAW, ORDINANCE OR GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BUILDING AND ZONING ORDINANCES)
RESTRICTING OR REGULATING OR PROHIBITING THE OCCUPANCY, USE OR ENJOYMENT OF THE LAND,OR REGULA ]NG THE CHAR-
ACTER, DIMENSIONS OR LOCATION OF ANY IMPROVEMENT NOW OR HEREAFTER ERECTED ON THE LAND, OR .•OHIBITING A
SEPARATION IN OWNERSHIP OR A REDUCTION IN THE DIMENSIONS OR AREA OF THE LAND,OR THE EFFECT OF A Y VIOLATION
OF ANY SUCH LAW, ORDINANCE OR GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION. .
2. RIGHTS OF EMINENT DOMAIN OR GOVERNMENTAL RIGHTS OF POLICE POWER UNLESS NOTICE OF THE EXERCISE 0' SUCH RIGHTS
APPEARS IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS AT DATE OF POLICY.
3. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS, OR OTHER MATTERS (a) CREATED,SUFFERED, ASSUMED OR GREED TO BY
THE INSURED CLAIMANT; (b) NOT KNOWN TO THE COMPANY AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT 4 OWN TO THE
INSURED CLAIMANT EITHER AT DATE OF POLICY OR AT THE DATE SUCH CLAIMANT ACQUIRED AN ESTATE OR INTEREST
INSURED BY THIS POLICY AND NOT DISCLOSED IN WRITING BY THE INSURED CLAIMANT TO THE COMPANY PRIO' TO THE DATE
SUCH INSURED CLAIMANT BECAME AN INSURED HEREUNDER; (c) RESULTING IN NO LOSS OR DAMAGE TO THE INSU-, D CLAIMANT;
d) ATTACHING OR CREATED SUBSEQUENT TO DATE OF POLICY; OR (e) RESULTING IN LOSS OR DAMAGE WHICH WO LD NOT HAVE
BEEN SUSTAINED IF THE INSURED CLAIMANT HAD PAID VALUE FOR THE ESTATE OR INTEREST INSURED B I THIS POLICY.
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
1. DEFINITION OF TERMS insured in all litigation consisting of actions or 4. NOTICE OF LOSS — LI ITATION OF
The following terms when used in this Proceedings commenced against such insured, or a ACTION
policy mean:
defense interposed against an insured in an action
In addition to the notices) required under
to enforce a contract for a sale of the estate or
paragraph 3(b)of these Conditions. d Stipulations,
a) "insured": the insured named in interest in said land, to the extent that such liti-
a statement in writing of any los or damageforScheduleA, and, subject to any rights or defenses gation is founded upon an alleged defect, lien,
which it is claimed the Compan is liableundertheCompanymayhavehadagainstthenamedin- encumbrance, or other matter insured against
this policy shall be furnished t., theCompanysured, those who succeed to the interest of such by this policy.
within 90 days after such loss or d. age shallhaveinsuredbyoperationoflawasdistinguishedfrom
b)The insured shall notify the Company been determined and no right of ac ons hallaccruepurchaseincluding, but not limited to, heirs,
distributees,devisees,survivors,personal represents- promptly in writing (i) in case any action or pro- to an insured claimant until 30 lays after such
tives, next of kin, or corporate or fiduciary ceeding is begun or defense is interposed as set statement shall have been furnis ed. Failure to
successors.
forth in (a) above, (ii) in case knowledge shall furnish such statement of loss .0 damage shall
come to an insured hereunder of any claim of title terminate any liability of the Corn.any under this
b) "insured claimant": an insured
or interest which is adverse to the title to the policy as to such loss or damage.
claiming loss or damage hereunder. estate or interest, as insured, and which might
c) "knowledge": actual knowledge, cause loss or damage for which the Company may
not constructive knowledge or notice which may be
be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if title to
5. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OT IERWISE SET-
imputed to an insured by reason of any public
the estate or interest, as insured, is rejected as un
TLE CLAIMS
records. marketable. If such prompt notice shall not be
given to the Company, then as to such insured all The Company shall have the option to pay or
d) "land": the land described, speci- liability of the Company shall cease and terminate otherwise settle for or in the name of an insured
fically or by reference in Schedule C,and improve- in regard to the matter or matters for which such claimant any claim insured against 'r to terminate
ments affixed thereto which by law constitute real • prompt notice is required;provided,however,that all liability and obligations of the +Dompany here-
property; provided,however,the term"land"does failure to notify shall in no case prejudice the under by paying or tendering p. ment of the
not include any property beyond the lines of the rights of any such insured under this policy unless amount of insurance under this ..licy together
area specifically described or referred to in Schedule the Company shall be prejudiced by such failure with any costs, attorneys' fees an. expenses in-
C, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement and then only to the extent of such prejudice. curred up to the time of such payme1 t or tender of
in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, payment, by the insured claimant . d authorized
ways or waterways, but nothing herein shall modi-
c)The Company shall have the right at its
by the Company.
fy or limit the extent to which a right of access to own cost to institute and without undue delay
and from the land is insured by this policy. prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any
other act which in its opinion may be necessary or
e) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of desirable to establish the title to the estate or in-
6. DETERMINATION AND P YMENTOFtrust, trust deed, or other security instrument. terest as insured, and the Company may take any
LOSS
f) "public records": those records appropriate action under the terms of this policy,
which bylaw impart constructive notice of matters
whether or not it shall be liable thereunder, and a) The liabilityof the Comp. ypshallnottherebyconcedeliabilityorwaiveanylet under this
relating to said land. policy shall in no case exceed the le: t of:
provision of this policy.
d)Whenever the Company shall have
i) the actual loss o' the insured
2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER
brought any action or interposed a defense as re
claimant; or
CONVEYANCE OF TITLE
quired or permitted by the provisions of this policy, ii) the amount of insu :nce stated in
The coverage of this policy shall continue in the Company may pursue any such litigation to Schedule A,
force as of Date of Policy in favor of an insured so final determination by a court of competent juris-
long as such insured retains an estate or interest in diction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole b)The Company will pay, i addition to
the land,or holds an indebtedness secured by a pur- discretion, to appeal from any adverse judgment or any loss insured against by this polic all costs im-
chase money mortgage given by a purchaser from order. posed upon an insured in litigation .arried on by
such insured, or so long as such insured shall have the Company for such insured, al d all costs,
e) In all cases where this policypermitsliabilitybyreasonofcovenantsofwarrantymade attorneys' fees and expenses in liti :tioncarriedorrequirestheCompanytoprosecuteorprovidebysuchinsuredinanytransferorconveyanceofonbysuchinsuredwiththewritten -uthorization
such estate or interest; for the defense of any action or proceeding,the in-
provided, however, this
sured hereunder shall secure to the Company the
of the Company.
policy shall not continue in force in favor of any
right to so prosecute or provide defense in such ac- c)When liability has been definitelyfixedpurchaserfromsuchinsuredofeithersaidestateor
tion or proceeding,and all appeals therein,and per- in accordance with the conditions o this policy,interest or the indebtedness secured by a purchase
mit the Company to use,at its option,the name of the loss or damage shall be payable w hin 30daysmoneymortgagegiventosuchinsured.
such insured for such purpose.Whenever requested thereafter.
by the Company, such insured shall give the
3. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF AC-
TIONS — NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE Proceeding, in effecting settlement, securing evi-
Continued on inside back ever)
GIVEN BY AN INSURED CLAIMANT Bence, obtaining witnesses, or prosecuting or de
fending such action or proceeding,and the Company
a)The Company,at its own cost and with- shall reimburse such insured for any expense so
out undue delay,shall provide for the defense of an incurred.
I.
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
I
Continued from inside front cover)
7. LIMITATION OF (ABILITY 10. APPORTIONMENT 12. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY
No claim shall arise •r be maintainable under
1
If the land described in Schedule C con- This instrument together with all endorse-
this policy(a)if the CQmpa y,after having received sists of two or more parcels which are not used as ments and other instruments, if any, attached
notice of an alleged defect lien or encumbrance in- a single site, and a loss is established affecting one hereto by the Company is the eptire policy and
sured against hereunder, b litigation or otherwise, or more of said parcels but not all, the loss shall contract between the insured and the Company.
removes such defect) lien or encumbrance or es- be computed and settled on a pro rata basis as if
Any claim of loss or damage whether ornottablishesthetitle, as,insu ed, within a reasonable the amount of insurance under this policy was di-
based on negligence, and which arises out ofthetimeafterreceiptofsuchnotice; (b) in the event vided pro rata as to the value on Date of Policy of
status of the title to the estate or interestcoveredoflitigationuntiltherehabeenafinaldetermina- each separate parcel to the whole,exclusive of any
hereby or any action asserting such claim, shallbetionbyacourtofcopet-nt jurisdiction,and dis- improvements made subsequent to Date of Policy,
position of all appeals th:refrom, adverse to the unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed restricted to the provisions and conditions and
title,as insured, as provid•d in paragraph 3 hereof; upon as to each such parcel by the Company and stipulations of this policy.
or (c) for liability voluntarily assumed by an in- the insured at the time of the issuance of this No amendment of or endorsement to this
sured in settling any clai or suit without prior policy and shown by an express statement herein policy can be made except by writing endorsed
written consent of the C.mpany. or by an endorsement attached hereto. hereon or attached hereto signed by either the Presi-
dent, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant
8. REDUCTION OF (ABILITY I Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signa-11. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR
All payments under this policy,except pay- SETTLEMENT tory of the Company.
ments made for costs, .ttorneys' fees and ex-
penses, shall reduce the a ount of the insurance Whenever the Company shall have settled a 13. NOTICES,WHERE SENT
pro tanto. No payment .hall be made without claim under this policy, all right of subrogation
All notices required to be given the Company
producing this policy fo endorsement of such shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of
and any statement in writing required to be fur-
payment unless the policy be lost or destroyed,in the insured claimant. The Company shall be subro-
nished the Company shall be addressed to it at its
which case proof of such loss or destruction shall bated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies
main office at 421 North Main Street,Santa Ana,
be furnished to the Satisf-ction of the Company. which such insured claimant would have had against
California,or to the office which issued this policy.
any person or property in respect to such claim
9. LIABILITY NONC MULATIVE had this policy not been issued,and if requested by
the Company, such insured claimant shall transfer
It is expressly under- ood that the amount of
to the Company all rights and remedies against any
insurance under this polic shall be reduced by any person or property necessary in order to perfect
amount the Company ma pay under any policy such right of subrogation and shall permit the
insuring either (a) a ortg:ge shown or referred to Company to use the name of such insured claimant
in Schedule B hereofjwhi•h is a lien on the estate in any transaction or litigation involving such rights
or interest covered bylthis •olicy,or(b)a mortgage or remedies. If the payment does not cover the
hereafter executed by an i sured which is a charge loss of such insured claimant,the Company shall be
or lien on the estate or interest described or re- subrogated to such rights and remedies in the pro-
ferred to in Schedule A, and the amount so paid portion which said payment bears to the amount of
shall be deemed a paymen under this policy. The said loss. If loss should result from any act of such
Company shall have the op ion to apply to the pay- insured claimant,such act shall not void this policy,
ment of any such mort•ages any amount that but the Company, in that event,shall be required
otherwise would be paya.le hereunder to the in- to pay only that part of any losses insured against
sured owner of the estat= or interest covered by hereunder which shall exceed the amount, if any,
this policy and the amoun so paid shall be deemed lost to the Company by reason of the impairment
a payment under this policy to said insured owner. of the right of subrogation.
I
1
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE
AMER t
N•7".
4y
First American Title Insurance Company
HOME OFFICE: SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA
Schedule C
Policy No. 71499
e land referred to in this policy is situated in the State of
W.•shington, County of King and is described as follows:
Pn •CEL A:
e East 98 feet of the West 273 feet of the North 60 feet of the South
4 '0 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southwest quarter of }+,.,n ,$W''41
oR. Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M., in King County,
W. shington.
P°RCEL B:
easement for ingress and egress, 15 feet in width, the centerline
described as follows:
B:•ginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 10;
ence South 88°02'43" East 821.38 feet;
t ence North 0°17',32" West 30 feet to the point of beginning;
t ence North 0°17'32" West 626.76 feet to the North line of said
s ivision;
a_CEPT any portion thereof lying within the above described main tract.
B th situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of
W. shington.
I I
v-RDER NO. 7/ çqq
1 ESCROW NO.
MORTGAGOR•
5,A1P4SSECTION/P—PrOWIsSlina RANGE 5.
1
0e.
Z.
e9
A6•
04
1
324. 0/ 324. 02 t
4- 34.1Gs
75 —
0
p
I
ANI1ii3rnr
CO3 tr)
98
A 6Aa.
I
1
0,i2
AG't
I Iti'",s
4- .,
dry I
K
QV
1
14
is
a
IL
N\
CO
i
N p
itl
43. (
IL
Z
2
tat
At.
1.:
i'''''
el},,
7 I /.
IL 2PG' c
6'"
i-is i4Es.z2 . 309.2/
W/,6 1II itS80/'362
ir
4536/2 4
ra6/27 /
Si
s.1 s
ENflw' o W 7_a9
F /?O i fO/d /Pd• /V /74,
L_
I
f29? 6 r==— N:88 O.
I
This map does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting said property; no liability
is assumed for variations in dimensions and location.
a i,„
oF
ggf}
dt
THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL
ANk; MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055. 235-25860amt.
09,
o
W
0'
TEa SEP1
I
July 4, 1983
Mr. M, ke Smith i
Benne t-Mul t ivest
1234 •outh 3rd
Rent. , WA 98055
RE: Sennett-Multivest Rezone, R-024-82
Dear r. Smith:
The C ty of Renton, in checking the legal description of the signatures
on' th- restrictive covenants of the subject rezone, has determined that
not o ly Water District #90 did not sign the restrictive covenants, but
anoth- r small parcel likewise did not sign. Since the City Council has
waive. the signature of Water District #90 only and not this other parcel ,
no' fu ther action will be taken on the rezone until correctly signed and
filed restrictive covenants have been presented to the city.
The Ways and Means Committee of the Council has set a deadline of July 29,
1983 or presentation! of this material to the city. If it is not presented,
the c ty will consider the rezone application as lapsed.
Very ruly yours,
i
is_ iv
640)
Lawre ce J. Warren j
City •ttorney
LJW:b.
cc: ity Clerk/
earing Examiner!
olicy Development
ul Iding and Zoning
ays and Means Committee11:1)
ECIEDWIE7-1%
yor
JUL 14, iyu3Ull L_,
CITY CLERK
bey-F , -
A fidavit of Publicationtt;
1
ti `R
E( ITY OF RENTON,• . :.'panarniaRnraII Wieadei
STATE 0' WASHINGTON WASHINGTON "},;..
i
COUN Y OF KING
ss. 2AF''INANCE NO.374 :q 1~.
ry' ORDINANCE
OFRENOT0 Rio; i _ for U.S. troop pul,lb
t,
THEIN ZONING,
G,
C
PANAMA CITY Panama—PresidentRicarZONMGCO, •C ndy S' rupp ATION OF CERTAit Central American peace efforts,called on Presjc
back American forces sent to the area for mili'
p
she chi Clerk The Panamanian leader, in an interview wit!:
oath,de oses a d says that is the of---
protested the United
THE DAILY RE ORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a l' •
D
former U.S. Canal Zt
week.Thatsaid newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been
planes over CentralAformorethan .ix months prior to theldate of publication referred to,
printed and pub'ished in the English language continually as a newspaper We want the canal t
published four(•)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is the best interest of PG
now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the i the whole world.”
aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record i
In the hour-long interview,the 48-year-old de
Chronicle has b•en approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior i
economist,sounded frustrated and wearied bytiCourtoftheComyinwhichitispublished,to-wit,King County,
tcq,ease international tension in Central.Americi
topple the U.S.-backed government of El Salk
Washington.Th:t the annexed is a Ord...#.37.4.3 leftist-led Nicaragua and U.S.-allied Honduras
Time is running out,"the Panamanian said."
I the fate of Central America. . :it could ignite
Aire-plagued residents vote on t ;
as it was published in regular issues(and
not in supplem;nt form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period
CENTRALIA, Pa.—Residents of this'central
Thursday on whether they want to go on endurin ,
mine fire that has burned for 21 years,or accept. '
the town.
of
a
consecutive issues,commencing on the
Leaders of the community of 1,000 were relucti :
i the non-binding referendum,which state official
12thday of
August 19
83 ,
and ending the atg idea of how many people would want to stay d
fire.But many of those who went to the lone voti
said they preferred abandonment.
I would like to stay in my home,but I do not w .
day,of 19 both dates 1 gases,"said Mary Tyson,a 70-year-old Centralia ,inclusive, and chat such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-
scribers durin_ all of said period. That the full amount of the'fee J
1 Administration plans nuclear wet
charged for th- foregoing publication is the sum of $1,11...6 dvhich , 7ASHINGTON—The Reagan administration '
has been paid i, full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the ; ! to"proceed with a new$3 billion to$6 billion n
first insertion .nd per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent ,manufacturing more explosives for atomic bom
insertion.Energy Secretary Donald Hodel ordered envir
on the suitability of building the so-called"New
government's Idaho Falls National Engineering
The announcement immediately drew anangri1.- Thurmond,R-S.C.,chairman of the Senate Armes
1 . Chief-Clerk
Meat prices expected to climb
Subscribed,and'.worn to before me this 12th day of 1
WASHINGTON — This fall's corn harves .
withered by summer heat and last winter's deci
Augus.t 19.83... Sion by the Reagan administration to reduc
production,is expected to be down 38 percent t •
5.24.billion•bushels,,the'government said Thurs
day:That ortends=hi'"her`meat rites in suet
1,1
Notary Public ' nd for the State of Washington, g .,, ' . ...-p
ng atXXIX;King County.
aklarkets. - --
F de al - rY t*F'
Passed by th-Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June
tr
9th, 1955.
Western Un'on Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by t e newspapers of the State.
I
lVN#87 Revi ed 5/8
Schedule B
art Two:Policy No. '71499
1. EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN AS GRANTED IN
INSTRt1ENT:
Recorded: December 22, 1944
Recording No. : 3436380
In favor of: . Puget Sound Pcwer and Light Conpany, a Massachusetts
corporation
For: Electric transmission and distribution line and
appurtenances thereto
Affects: Along the West side of an existing private road or said
road produced North
Said instrument contains the following:
Rights of access for purposes of maintenance or repair.
Right to cut ;or trim all brush or timber which constitute a danger
to said line.
EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN AS GRANTED IN
INSTRU'4ENT: '
Recorded: June 5, 1946
Recording No. : 3575605
In favor of: The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a
California corporation
For: Lines of telephone and telegraph or other communication
circuits and appurtenances thereto
Affects: The East 148.1.9 feet of the West half of the Southeast
quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter
EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS. CONTAINED THEREIN AS CREATED OR DISCLOSED
IN INSTRUMENT:
Recorded: December 7, 1955
Recording No.: 4643925
For: The right, privilege and authority to construct, ,improve,
repair and maintain an easement for ingress' and egress 15
feet in width
Affects: Over the West half of the Southeast quarter of the
Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section
10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , the center
line of which is described as follows: Coiurencing at
r Continued . ,. :- . . . Schedule B - Part Two)Policy,;No. 71499
the Southwest corner of said Section 10; thence South
88°02'43" East 821.38 feet; thence North 0°17'32" West
30 feet to point of beginning; thence North 0°17'32"
West 626.76 feet to the North line of said subdivision
1
4. DEED OF TRUST AND ADDITIONAL ADVANCES, IF ANY, AND THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantor: Lloyd P. La Plante, an unmarried man
Trustee: Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
Beneficiary: United Savings and Loan Association, a Washington ,
Corporation
ti
Original Amount: $19,800.00, plus interest
Dated: September 11, 1978
Recorded.: September 15, 1978
Recording No. : 7809150633
1
5. DEED OF TRUST AND ADDITIONAL ADVANCES, IF ANY, AND THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
1
Grantor: Edward J. Porter and Mary E. Porter, his wife
Trustee: Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Conpany, a corporation
Beneficiary: Lloyd P. La Plante and Jodie La Plante 1
Original Amqunt: $35,000.00, plus interest
Dated: February 22, 1980
Recorded: February 28, 1980 1
Recording NO. : 8002280063
By reason of resignation of the previous trustee, John S. Astle
was appointed new trustee in instrument recorded under No.
8102060789.
f
I.
Renton City Council
August 8, 1983
Page Four
Planning and provision of the draft proposal requiring approval of themobileDevelopmenthomeparkplanunderthecriteriaofconditionaluse (Sectiion
Committee 4-748) should be deleted. MOVED BY ROCKHILL,, SECONDED BY REED,
continued COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and M ans Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
Committee recommending the following ordinances for second 6 final reiadings:
Ordinance #3742 An ordinance was read annexing certain property, Lot 5 in Block 2
Ashley Annexation of Hilltop Heights Addition, to the City of Renton; Ashley
petition. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT
THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3743 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of
Bennett-Mu"ti- property located on the north side of NE 4th Street approximately
vest Rezon ._1950 feet east of Union Avenue NE from General Classification
District (G-1) and Residence District (R-3) to Business District
B-I ) for Bennett-Multivest, et al , File No. R-024-82 (first
reading 6/20/83) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. Upon inquiry, it was noted
that discrepancies in legal description of the subject site
will require resolution between current owner and prior owner,
but will not affect restrictive covenants executed on behalf
of the city. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, ROCKHILL,
I
HUGHES, CLYMER. 2 NAYS: REED, STREDICKE. CARRIED.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented the following
ordinance for first reading:
LID 328 (Garden An ordinance was read ordering construction and installation of
Avenue North) curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, utility
adjustments; storm drains and all necessary appurtenances on
Garden Avenue -N. from N. 4th to N. 8th Street in accordance
with Resolution No. 2511 establishing LID 328 (includes summary
ordinance) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, THIS MATTER
BE REFERRED BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Administrative
Assistant Parness advised that funds will not be expended on the
project until expiration of the period during which protests
may be filed. MOTION CARRIED.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented the following
resolution for reading and adoption:
Resolution #2523 A resolution was read authorizing request for allocation of
Requestlfor certain Federal funds for project to rehabilitate and mark
Allocation of taxiways and project to install airport fencing (ADAP Grant)
FederalfFunds at Renton Municipal Airport. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY
Airport Projects) HUGHESJ COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIEDI.
Voucher Approval Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
recommending approval of Vouchers 52365 through 52567 in the
amount of $963,997.03, having received departmental
certification that merchandise and/or services have been
received or rendered. Vouchers 52355 through 52364 machine
voided. Warrants included LID 314: $362,958.27. MOVED BY '
CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF
THE VOUCHERS. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke requested the Administration supply him
ParkinglAlong with copies of preliminary drawings of the area surrounding!
Lake Washingtcn Gene Coulon Park to aid in determining whether parallel parkins
Boulevard can bedaccommodated along Lake Washington Eoulevard for park
patrons, since he felt.an extreme amount of property is posted
no parjking." Mayor Shinpoch reported receipt of a letter from
State Department of Transportation indicating plans to construct
a bicycle trail from Factoria to Renton along the edge of Lake
Washington Boulevard. Captain Don Persson advised major concern
of Police Department that safety of pedestrian traffic will be
greatly, hampered if parking is allowed on that dangerous roadway.
Considering these facts, Councilman Stredicke felt that offL
pavement pedestrian and bicycle facilities ought to be investigated.
j
I
j WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
I
COMMITTEE REPORT
AUGUST 8, 1983
I
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
I
The W ys and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second
and f nal reading:
Ashley Annexation
1
Bennett-Multivest Rezone
i
The W
lys and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance and summary
ordin nce for first reading:
1
Construction of LID 328 (Garden Ave. N.) .3x--''''"- '"3''`
f
i
I
r
The W ys and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading
and adoption:
Allocation of !Federal Funds for Renton Airport Projects
i
APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS 1
The W ys and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 52365
throu h No. 52567 in the amount of $963,997.03.
r—
C;),-__QENC)---A--)",..
Earl lymer, Chairman
1
1
Ri cha d red i cke
Robe Hughes
i
OF R,E
I
h lb ,
I ,,.
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
r MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR
9,
0
O'
CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500
04)
41. SEPS4e
1
Augu.t 10, 1983
Paci is Land Research
1140 - 140th Avenue NE
Bell -vue, WA 98005
1
Atte tion: Mr. Michael L. Smith, President.
Subj:ct: City of Renton - Ordinance No. 3743
l Bennett Multivest Rezone 024-82
Dear Mr. Smith: .
The Benton City Council at its regular meeting of August 8, 1983, has
adopted Ordinance No. 3743 rezoning your property from General Class-
ific.tion District (G-1) and Residence District (R-3) to Business District
B-1 ) file number R-024-82 Bennett-Multivest, et al .
A ,co lili of the above-referenced ordinance is enclosed.
Si,nc rely yours,
CITY OF RENTON
Maxin E. Motor
City ' l erk.
MEM:de
enclo.ure
cc: earing Examiner
I
I
CITY OF RENTON,. WASHINGTON
I
ORDINANCE NO. 3743
I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CHANGING THE ' ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM
GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G-1) AND
RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1)
R-024-82 -Bennett-Multivest , et al)
WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 1628 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of
Renton"„ .s amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction
therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned
as General Classificatlion• District (G-1) and Residence District (R-3) ; and
WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of
I
said prop rty has been 'filed with the Building & Zoning Department on
or about March. 19, 1982., which petition was duly referred to the Hearing
Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing
having be n held thereon on or about June 29, 1982 , and said matterhavingi
been duly considered byl the Hearing Examiner and the Hearing Examiner
having fo nd that with certain conditions said zoning request is in
conformity with the City` s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the
applicant having appealed certain of those conditions to the City Council
and the' C' ty Council having modified the conditions imposed by the
Hearing; E aminer, and all parties having been heard appearing in support
or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS :
1-
i
SECTION I : The following described property in the City of
Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow
speciif ed; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the
Hearin: Examiner datled July 21 , 1982, as modified by the City Council ;
the Bu lding and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to
change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said .
rezoi ,g, to-wit :
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof
as if fully set forth herein.
Said property being located on North side of N.E. 4th
Street approximately 950 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. )
AND SUBJECT to that certain Declaration of Restrictive
Covena is executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about July 27, 1983
re-
and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections
I I
Receiv.ng No. 8307271099 and which said Covenants are hereby
incorp•rated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth.
SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its
passag= , approval and five days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 8th day of August , :1983 .
I
Maxine E. Motor , City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 8th day of August 1983.
JAM') S4u.n, o4v
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Approved as to form:
r
4
Lai• ence J. Wa ? e Citty..,:ttorney
Date 'of Publication: August 12, 1983
r
j ORDINANCE NO. 3743
EXHIBIT "A" 1. ! L° ,,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FEB - 11983
Rezone R-024-82 Bennett-Multivest, et al
B LL;W:3.ZOfr;JN'I3 DEPT.
Revised 8/1/83•
PARCEL A.
k
The Wet 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township,23North, Range 5 East, W.M. :1
EXCEPT the North 629 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the West 305 feet of-the South ,5 feet of the North 694Jf'eet of said sub-
division;
AND EXCEPT the Southerly 629 feet of the Westerly 396.4 feet of said subdivision;
AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows:
Beginning _.t 'a point 30 feet North of the Southeast corner of said West 1/2 of the
Southwest /4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 10; thence West ,250 feet; thence
North 436 eet; thence East 25Q feet; thence South 436, feet to the point of beginning;,AND EXCEPT th'e Southerly. 42 feet of said subdivision for S.E. 128th Street as conveyed
to King;Co my by deeds recorded under Recording Nos. 5741040 and 5741044;
AND EXCEPT the Westerly Westerly 40 feet of said subdivision for Union Avenue N.E. ;
PARCEL B ,
That poittion of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Sect ion 10,
Township 2 North, Range 51East, W.M. , described as follows:
Beginning 42 feet North and 75 feet West of the Southeast corner of said West 1/2;
Thence Wes ' 175 feet; thence North 424 feet; thence East 175; thence South 424 feet
to the poi t of beginning;
PARCEL C
The East 7m feet of the following:
Beginning 42 feet North of the Southeast corner of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4oftheSouhwest1/4 of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King
County, Washington; thence West 250 feet; thence North 424 feet; 1/thence East 250 feet;
thence Slut 424 feet to the point of beginning;
PARCEL D
The West; 175 feet of the South 622- feet of the East half of the Southwest quarteroftheSouthwestquarterofSection10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , in King
County Washington;f
EXCEPT the outh 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road'by deed recorded
under Relcor'ing No. 57905051.
Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington
PARCEL Ej
The South 1 2 of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Southwest quarter oftheSouthwestqarterofSection10, Township 23 North, _Range 5, East, W.M. , in King Co. , WA. ,
EXCEPT the outh 622 feet :of. the West 175 feet, AND EXCEPT the South 470 feet thereof.
PARCEL F1
1
The South 2 0 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southwest quarter of
the Southwe t quarter, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,. W.M. , in King
County, Washington;
EXCEPT the West 175 feet;
EXCEPT the outh 42 feet conveyed to King County for. roa.d..under King County ' •
Recording N . 5738286.
PARCEL GI
The North 1 0 feet of the South 360 feet of the West half of the East half of theSouth-
west quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M. , g County, Washington; .
EXCEPT the est 175 feet thereof.
I'I
7,11l! 5) I
ILegalDesriptionforSubjectRezoneArea6Page2
Ordinance No. 3743 FEB - 1983
PARCEL11-1
The South 470 feet of theSouth 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the East. 1/2 of the Southwest
quarter Of the Southwest quarter of Section 10., Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M. , in ing County, Washington;
EXCEPT, th- West 175 feet thereof;
AND EXCEP the South 360. feet thereof,
3
CITY OF REN '''! •
333.1
4:
1. • t:-.E322, •.
iir -
LT? Earl 5 rri' i t
4
2.67 AC
O.6'
ii::
31
I
3o
1 0 L:
ii
I
I ,
to 14 et
School DiStrIC107.36 A c.
8. .
ri @ 111 . R1MAR1912e0.614c. 1.ft
a "
41 ii en
i3 q Z
10 -04,. a gra,
i•••
EUILDIN61.ZVNIN DEPT.
13.
G _
RO4 0 4:7-54.fr
I 7,
041
la I....
10 .
le
ti 1 ,
Ili '
i
jj, ...
RENTaN
6i. •
C -
R°.4-°-----(-5Afr- -
ORPORATE
LIM!
4' .
i I0P: • ").iollia:
5warn:
3,9: 7 .
2 Llovp., V. 3 Hazel C °
8 __-.. ." Z- Z.7.
1 .:-.::'x:::zz..7.7_7.r.
r IZ t% OM
09.44
0
F ,
@
4.,
1
vyeber LI
0 81
a'..
EjAc• , .....„
154.1 •
i.•
CP
r" 3 (394c no .
OD (9 5 5i"
Rutri Ven
mcDwoiniarla
E.
I 0 (--, , 0.534c
314.4i
134 41 -'
I
is 0.94
ilc.
309.4 4 0
lams ci.93Ac. f4
1
6,
1
i., ,arue4. Charley Ruc",ke i
a,
14 El .J. Davi la,atJdJesen13
i
1„
Or 1 ;fryI. G,
1i 59ACV..) I;
1122 Ac. I
1 •
P13,_ •
6.--''
50 3'iti• el
si5851i 2.89r4cIl0.40..-1c. CD •
i
a u 12:.
6 0
I
I 4-
gt-Ts-
rft
6 a •
if
1 r•
u
Ja
Davic Jansen
71
iir,".,
u
it
114.
g 36 4
6 13
4.50 Ac.
so d
i' . . • r,4
0
I 4 2
as
75 0.9
i-:lilVIJcser,:i .,
I 1.
11(1,
Z .
A1,I Z.:
I.•
r ,"
1 4.)
0
Efil% A.3et wq
A
1 4
i72,__i
1,3
fini
479.._.....r•.,
t.. *. *".. .
r
0 ..:
n ---r
j.
3; 9 I?
I I °
Q. 1 ".
1 fl 0-2 5 A C.
I I__c Jo;, . q
3110azSo
cii-
z-
It a
o
ual • ii •
L. k
a
41 0IF .: x .)
4.
1 • < <
Slihr.
V. I 11 r. .4.1,..-)
i W 1
i Z
4 0 si
is
W I.
ci Cc-
1-
36
e--0,•
0;71A
Ul 4 •
2 i,i.43 .K..
i/ -) c:
1 ....
ii-.4 •A
J
1
I
83 131 IS . .
P' 06411 w,
xi •- .t-------4774T .L.„--...77,-,........„
s 1
91111---
H....„:.„.„-,....siTEL.------,...._______,1_,,____
1 , ,, 6 :(
i .- •: ''' :
t:•::
L',. . I.t., . ......
REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE -------------
pAviNG
1ROLLMAPCOMPANY, I NC.,,SgATTLEmowP. = 200 FT. • x0PyRIGHT KROU.. !mAp
COMPANY, INc.
OR PART FOR PERSONAL USEORRESALEISPROHIBITEDBYLAW
COUNTY TAXLOT1
7-r•-• --,:
e.i.v,•-tf-'1--_-1''..
ite . -'- ':. .14.1.. ---: ••- ., • , ... ,.
4:,-,-,r_,:r-'.•-:.)'-'4..M.0:.!:,'.4:4-'1;:z.i..:?2,(!.',:..T.
it4:.;.1;."..!?t:‘,..;..,t,,,'741.1,41,--•-•!-- • .; ,,,-7,..-:;____,,,,-,,.. .34-1-
4-7 I:
1,,.....,;;:-.:../-'
4,y,itz.„,,. .:.i.•••,:.•,_,..,
R......?,.... . .
4'• ':. ....,.;,..
y.;',.:"..
t";:it.1 ;•2)...4.
1111L 77,;;.......z.
47,';.i .'•:!., ,...-. ....,.....t•i.:-.77.... 9 -4-%... .1.:?.i:.-•...,-*.' ''''-,..- .'..4,:••; •:-..-ic• .1,'-•,..o.,-•• .• .--: ::-.0:..`,.:.,;-"..--''' '-"f`'-•;,.-.':'-.:
1:." •...-,:: '.:-:--.....,..., .....-. •, _ .-,,
i
1
A
0OFFICE
OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON
V . - 1:. 4
POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • REN70N,WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678
o
p GIMP
LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
9'
0 1
DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
09 i
qTQ! `e
MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
SE
August 3, 1983 • ZANETTA L.FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY,
1
TO : Ways and. Means Committee
F OM: LawrenceHJ. Warren, City Attorney
Bennett-Multivest Rezone
G tlemen:
Engineering! Department called me recently and disclosed
a further problem with the legal descriptions in the Bennett-
M ltive.st Rezone. The deed to Bennett-Multivest dealt with
t e Southwest Quarter of Section 10 while the Restrictive
C venants dealt! with the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest
1Qu arter of Section 10 . The two legal descriptions. do not
cover the same piece of property. The error is apparently
a transcription error in the legal descriptions of the
property and I have contacted Jim Magstadtwho is representing
B nnet-Multivest locally, and asked him to clarify the problem,
a d hopefully resolve it . If the problem is as it appears ,
m rely a transcription__problem, then Bennett-Multivest has
m t the Council ! coriditions for the rezone: As . soon as I have
a definite word; on what has occurred, I will so advise you.
C,c PvL f.
Lawrence Warren
LJW:nd
i cc : Mayor
1
OF R(
1?
ti0OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON,WASHINGTON
POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678
NAL
p2' LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
00ggT MO
P
July 29, 1983 MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
FO SEP1 ZANETTA L.FONTES,.ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
10: WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
ROM: Lawrence 'J. Warren, City Attorney
Bennett - Multivest Rezone
gentlemen:
1 have been presented with a Deed, policy of title '
nsurance and are-recorded Declaration of—Restrictive
dovenants from Bennett----- -Multivest. It- would appear to
Me, from a brief review Of- the legal descriptions
ontained in `•those_documents _that-Bennett - Multivest . .
as title to the -second .parcel of property that was
of included in the restrictive covenants . As you
ay recall, the Council decided that the first parcel,
he Water District parcel, was not necessary asaninclusionintherestrictivecovenants, but the second
arcel was necessary. Subject to conformation by the
ngineering Department, as ,to the legal description, it
ould appear to me that the problems with the second
parcel would. ble, removed and this ordinance may be placed
n second and if inal-reading.__--- --
a rence J. arren
LJW:•bjm
f=•;',
FI""T AMERIl AN TITLE I ..
1lidis ., r. '1
I 'III P., I,I.Ati..11rA.,D I!LDG
1. ''!.(.
DECIARATI( V OF RESI'RLCrrVE'COVENANTS 1 Iv +', , '
ViT EREAS, Deib y C. Bennett and his wife Bette
Corporation;, •+ sseyDevelopment Co Multivest
L
P1'pi Corporation, LTD, and Ring County',,',; :,. : J•
N' , F
Water District No. 90 are the owners of the following real property in the ' ' `' •'f 1 ' t ,:..C.. ' 1 CiIic
c t), of Renton County of King,, State of Washington, described as.follow,s; p
ii 'mil e
1.,AS:1 a.•
r 1.' .
lit
j
LEGAL DESCRIPTION k .a '. `
D Y
y
G:
ID„
PAJCEL AA: C)
odsp1'; :i Ji OfReCTheWest1OfteSouthwest ? •of theSouthwesta of Section 10, Tcxnmsi'23ectior,yNorth, Range S,East, W.M. ;1
E C er the North629 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the West 3C5 feet of. the South 65 teet of the North 694 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the Southerly 629 feet of the Westerly 396.4 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT tha portion thereof .described as follows:
Beginning at a point 30 feet North of the Southeast bonier of said West 1
Of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of said Section 10; thence West 250
feet; ', ' ,
r1eTlOe,North 4 6 feet;
theme.East 250 teet;
thence South; 4316 feet to the point of beginning;
AND EXCEPT the post Southerly 42 feet thereof for S.E. 128th St. as coveyed
to King County by deeds recorded under Recording Nos. 5741040 and 5741044;
AND. WEPT,the st' Westerly 40, teot thereof for, >anion Avenue N.E. ; • . '
I'{•:4'I' I )
I
f I
P BBf ; 1,
That'portion'of the West 1/2'of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest' 4 of i Section ,
0, hip _23 .North, Range 5 East, W.M. described as follows:
l
Beginning 42 feet North and Z5 feet;West of the' Southeast cornea of 'Said West ,
thence West 175 Feet.; I
thence North 42. feet;
thence East 175 feet;
1 thence South 142 feet to tt e. point: •of tegirnzing;,.
PARCEL C: '.
I,. . '
The East 75 fee of the following:
f • 19 ,
I
Beginning 42'f t North of the Southeast corner Of the West. t of the Southwest ,
Vof the Southwest ; of Section 10, Township 23 North, l arge: .5.East; W.M.
in King County, TashingtLn;•I •
thence West 250 Meet; i
thence North 424 feet;
thence East 250 eet; •
thence South 424 feet to the point of beginning; I .
H
PARCEL D: i
The West 175 fee of the South 622 feet of the East half of the Southwest
1
of the uthwestquarter of Section 1 , PNorth, RangequarterQ .a4unsYii 23
east W.M, , In; Kiang County, Wash ngton;
I I
A !. I
I'II I.
111 111;11. • 'L1 1
EXCEPT the South 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by deed •
recorded under Recording No. 579 505. '
Situate in the C'ty of Renton, County of King, State of Washington I' I"
PAIL E5
1
The South t of the West 1 of the East 1 of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest
quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5, East W.M. , in King County,
Washington, except the South 622, feet of the West 175 feet, and except the
South 470 feet thereof. .
Tf ti
i
a-g ;getter withan'easement f, ingress and egress -15 feet is, ze width across,
aver,,,and upo the West 1 of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter
bf the South st quarter of said Section 10, the centerline of which is described
as 'follows!: inning at the Southwest corner of said Section 10; thence
South 881% ;02' 3" East 821.38•feet; thence North 0' 17'32" West 42 fee to the point
0ofbeginning; thence North 17 32 West 580 feet to the terminus of said line;
except that rtion thereof 'included in the hereinabove described main tract.
PARCEL F: j
T a South 250 feet of .the West half of the East half of the Southwest quarter --.
of.the South st quarter, Section '10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.
in-King Cairn , Washington;
EXCEPT the We 175 feet;
E?VEPT the1 S th 42 feet conveyed to King County under King County.Recording . •
No. 5738286.
PARCGG:
1
The.North 110 feet of the South 36U feet of the•West half of the East half
ofthe Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township
0 23 North,e 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West
q 175 feet then f., TOGETHER with an easement for ingress and egress of 15 •
test in width over, across and upon the following described real estate in-
King County, shington: Over the South 220 feet of the West half oftheCo
East half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10,
9 Township 23 N rth, Range 5 East W.M. , in King County, Washington, the centerline
of which is defined as follows: Ccnmencing at the Southwest corner of said
Q Section 10 - - South 88' 02'43" East 821.38 feet;. thence North 0'17'32"
West 30 feet the point of beginning; thence North 0' 17'32" West 220 feet.
I •
PARCEL H: -,
The South 470 feet of the South 3.4 of the West 31 of the East 11 Of the Southwest
quarter of.. - Southwest qua .er of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5
East, W.M,
e, ' King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 175 feet thereof and
k 'T the• • th 360,feet thereof zt 90 fcct of the North
1,,,a- tate-h
Together ,with an easement 15 feet in width for roadway and utlities across,.
over and 'upon the West 3 of the Southeast quarter.Of the southwest quarter
of the Sou -st quarter of Section 10, the centerline of which is described
as follows.
1
Beginning at •, .- Southwest corner of said Section 10; thence South 88'02'
43" East U211.38 feet; thence North 0'17'32" West 42 feet to the point of
beginning; 'i - North 0'17'32" West 580 feet to the terminus of said line;
EXCEPT that •• thereof included in hereinabove described main tract.
Tax lot 33i3, . • • section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M.)
1 . r:
1 Building Setbacks for Primary Shopping Center Structure
Future expansi•n of a primary ishopping
center structure eastward from the
Safeway store - provide a setback line that is compatible with a unified
shopping cen - development approach, while providing architectural and design
flexibility.
Landscape Buffer '
A minimum ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer together with a site cdbsouring
fence shall be provided along the North property line, and a minimum ten (10)
foot wide 1- •- -pe buffer shall be provided along the East property line. ...
Such buffers - be -installed as part of site development consistent with
the extent of ite development phasing. If adaitional property to the East
is incorpora =• in the shopping center concept the Easterly buffer may be
moved Eastward consistent with such potential future expansion.
I
I
r{s,f
DURATION
1/
These .
i
is shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If
at any t rovements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion
of the is pertaining to the, specific installed improven nts as required
by the Or; s of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity
of further •ft . - tertian. MI y amendments or modifications of this agreement
Hohal.l be oval • only if mutually agreed upon by the City of Renton and the
Owners (iJK l • g heirs, successors, and assigns to the owners) in writing
and recorded with the King County Department of Records and Elections.
Proper regal prgoedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated •
by either: - Citt of Renton'or any property owners adjoining subject property • t-
Who are'ad - sely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive''' ` `
D- its `-.sonable attorney's fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding
0 will be •• - by the parties whin the court determines are in error and shall '
43
r be entered a- a judgment in such action.
s .. pti„,, / ,,' .4
i
rf' • -tt s L. Magstadt,t -
Landon DeveltIi0 ; •'-' - 4.
Aette /Charles Owen, President
l
i Odyssey Development Corp.
a ut - hest LTD• •'
a ._... • .
State of Wa 1 gton) •
t
STATE OF WASHINGTON,)
ss.
County of King l
On this 30th day of March 19 83 , before me personally appeared
Cheryl A. Henry to me known to be the individual who executed the
foregoing instr ment as Attorney in Fact for• Del beet C. Bennett and Bette A. Bennett
and acknowledged that She signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed as Attorney in Fact
for said princip• •forthe•uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that the Power of Attorney authorizing
the execution tihirs-4nuln:,tretjt has n t been revoked and that said principal is now living and is not insane .
L"
lJGI U tdq r hand,•and official seal the day and year 1 ab e 'teen.
i;j.• %C.•r;" Notary Publi n and for the State of Was ington,
ACKNOWLfD ENT_:---AORNEY IN FACT
r siding at
FIRST AME,R N.TITLE CMOMPANY
WA-47 • !ie<i,,.. . .
K..:
j Notary Public in and for the State
I of Washington, residing in---
rrogy-..-1
c A
I)
1 "4--"'.' '1'7 24e.,1„),
L r.,3
JA.IiiS r
1---;
day of 19 , before me pen lly appeared
a„.,....
grek.trporate epresentative of Landon Development Corp. , the person who executed
the within 1-1a foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be
1--.-.
the free and uluntary act and deed ot said person for the uses and purposes
therein mentio; =• .
k,..,)H.!:.
NW-MESS , IN-Diwo I have her unto set my hand and affixed my offical sRal
1
r.,
the da.,. andly.= for the above written.
if 1
t ..
1r,',,'•,;.,,ii.;?:• :.•••• ,'"n• ,
A .._, ,.:y -; :r.,
C
ot.l..
4..!.!
oil,,,if,
1•• '•.'....'••-4 '.;• Altivemin‘wii„10:4„,v..e4i,;•,.....,..,)„...„ , .:,:. .
i.o -.....,,
k-v.
de.,-. . , s .,W1.ljc in'arid for the State
Ak, ,
1;
t...;.. : - •gton, residing in '
4•1'-'s.?..1., to ,';'•••°. :.°.::-., i •-,'
e 'I,/.2.-
its'..,,,.... -•
1 ,,..,:.,...- ....
y,,-•.,.:••
r)f: ,1 I 1,,,,,'
i,
5t44..}
24-111 4
On this , day of(—,
1 ,
19 /3 , before me personally appeared the
1
gprpqrate rep esentative of Odyssey Development corp. , the person who executed. ,
11
instrumnt to be
t4eudthin foregoing instilument, and acknowledged said e
I
the free and luntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes
there men .
i:-_-: •'• ' - '
IN WIN.= WI4EXF,. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical seal
the Oay, and yar for the above written.
k.,. ....14-•,•4•:'' '' •
1: .," . I. 4 '- ., ., '
0.,•.),_,..01-,..j ,?
9,, - .- •
7.... .`"/ % • - -. ; .
4.-**.
vIco't i;t:!•.. ,-
er ' •I
64... . 0,
4. „,k..o, ti. ., .,, •
4 4.1:
47 •
i•9°,7.1 i'l`
t • S ';,:•'
y
6_, • 4i19 '. .r\
s,..
S',.. 1 i1 •',of Washingtortbsirling '
0. ',,:.
n;4 .
lZ,/:0. i .,,.
1 ,
Z. .
6 j: 'A lP1
4
6..
i.
toi, ...oil . ;".:: . •
day ot:7IkeLeii- 19 6
1
before me personally appeared .
I
the Corporate representative of Multivest Development Corp., the person who
1 I
executed the 'thin and foregoing instrunent, and acknowleged said instrument
to be the t .. and voluntary act and deed of said person tor the uses and
purposes , - - . gent:boned.
1
I
IN WITNF.S.Si.
IN." / I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ny offical seal
Vbe .4ay. and' ear,for 'kale ahPve W4tten.
iig'? ',
0......
taidi.... . •
Iji ',i • 1'0 -•
4 /
r, •.;
6 ......vl... 1 -', ,!'. '
e --s. .--, cA 4, • -••• •
I! "l`,.... V c
Z.,S';* ,,,, ..I ,e'.t. ,:•:.;. ;,.r • 1 '
11:,ig:•\'o•f.''''
1'. •':;.---...,« ' • . • , • ::.: :::..'.•...
1 ..!c) -••-•*9 • • • --: • Notary lic in and for State --
1 ::-. ?.i.2,..r.
I---• -",„'z' ::.of Wa ' gton, residing in
1 • —:: • ••.
1...-. •• .
I• .' . •• •
1 ,
I
1
yfterOFR
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
P 4o•
094TFOSEP1 •O
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH_
RECEIVEDMAYOR
J UN 2 31983
June 23, 19 3
CITY OF RENTON
CITY COUNCIL
The Honora le Barbara Y. Shin'poch, Mayor
Members o Renton City Council
Renton,l Wa hington
RE: Be ett-Multivest Rezone, R-024-82 - Discrepancies in Application Information
and ovenants
Dear Mayo and Council Members:
City staff, reviewing the restrictive covenants submitted by the applicant, have found a
number of discrepancies of which you should be aware before passage of an ordinance
reclassify the applicant's property.
You are! a eady aware of the fact that, while the applicant submitted an affidavit (see
attachment 1) attesting to ownership of the entire acreage portions, the property proved,
in fact, to e owned by Water District 90.
Therefore, the applicant could not execute covenants conditioning uses of that property;
and the pro erty's owner, the Water District, chose not to join in execution.
The covenants which the applicant has submitted remain unclear as to whether they do or,
in fact,] car restrict the Water District property. Further, after review of the legal
boundaries of the applicant's proposed shopping center, it is apparent that the applicant
submitted both plot plans and boundary maps which included additional property which is
not owned by the applicant.
While the li gal description s Ibmitted by the applicant did not include this property, the
maps relied on by staff in reviewing the request were inaccurate. As a result, the review
failed to take account of Parcel 373, 4316 N.E.'4th Street, (see map) which would remain
an island of unprotected and isolated single family residential zoning in the midst of a B-1
District shipping center.
The a pplice t, through inadvertence, failed to note this in any presentation and permitted
the staff to overlook this important aspect of the request.
D
The Honor ble Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Members o Renton City Council
June 23 1983
Page 2
The applic nt, therefore, cannot speak for either the Water District property or this
additional roperty. Any covenants which -run-with the land cannot be used to protect
either the ity's interest in well planned development, or without modification can the
applicant's covenants protect the island of single family zoning.
The ordina ce and covenants as written did not consider the excluded property, and any
further;act on by you should consider this fact.
Very. ru y
ousdifetere
avid I. Clemens
Policy Dev
I
lopment Director
DRC:FJIR:
0183G ,
Attachm en s
123IIQ- usist I t van
ISUILCANG/ZoNING DEPT.
10, K.0",;;I! .- • ,
t;;,.,=i,-c'.';' • ' ,
1
7, Inv/ !former t
being duly sworn, declare thatIoperty
am
Ermeroteprolswoveinthis
application and thattheforegoingstatementsandanswershereincontainedandtheinformationherew.iith submitted are in all respects. true and correct to the bestofmyknoWldgeandbelief.. •
i,:, .... . ._ •....-_,-. -.
1.....,
i •
1
Subscribe
and 'sworn before me
this IIn, day ocLI.IL.,221 19e2. ,
Notary Pu lic in and for the State of
Washingto ,
residing .at, 12_______.
y•
Yc 1
Name-0 ,
ary Pu c
Sign ture o er
1
711/0 in
ess)
I
47122 108 th Ave. SE Suite 200
Addr
Renton, Washington 98055
City
State
255-9448 -
WiliFFEE61-------------------
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is tic) ,
ertify that the
foregoingpplication
has been inspected by me
and has b10el
found to be thorough and complete in every particular andtoIconformtOtherulesandregulationsotheRentonPlanningDepartmentgoverningtiefilingofsuchapplication.
Date Rece v -d
19._
By:
Renton Planning Dept.
2-73
1
30
31
l_ . —1B J& ,-. _ _
1wYCC-1 .rl•r 1,U TJ?0 1--_
I.jl..w.
41.\ .
irr-ru.4
E4 n.c u u t3
1
a 1
Cxz 11 w t:aa .11i:t-n1 z:_b'
r'" 1
1
t lit rim c
I k G.*8
r.
1
i k ! ; i r-,,.-,_;.?
I III i j
i.
CI'.\ .,
r
5s-aJ_..
1', Y,
I1 y k 4 bt•r
E
jLer) :
ifit8 ,, ..,.. . .,!
N
i i•
1 1 1-5 __
1 I
r. j 81I ,jtl • j
ivy I
tr—
Pt '1
1 2 ` 19 e
i !
Vts
1
a1 a...
eli'L
y-
I
1
I 1
I
I
I
ram
4'
I.
L--:-k.
1 1
g !
w.
11
1 1 I-
11 ate 1
t, k-1 s
4
MAR 19 1982
EUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
L .. -13- -6W.- 1
d .
jprcc -b Ls c' L3IA1d"'•
1 I aIImo,•
r,
p
r _1J1 't
1^
r TI:4 .s .. .
Y am'.
0n a
I 7 - .!
i
i
8 S i7 ®f .
I
S iI j / 11 p
y y i/
I .
Y
I.
ir
R•
M
1
w.. T s.+tl ry
f jy iy
x I',
ii.....
p-
I10
ti
r ter, -
c
i
i
1
ate,+ I i?
r !
PII
j
H
tcr coat;' uws...s
r.
i:
A' J G
NN_
f.,..,
4 ":---I - --- ' - --- -- . -
1. '- ---- ----------- - -
i.- -
t
7 ''':i'',. .• ,,..._,___. , i ____ __ ___ _____ _____ __ I. _:,___
t
iTs.
1
01 f_______.
11-.fit cam,•. a 44'g '
i--i
D 1-
li9 1,?, b vi F.. M3_2 ,.IAR I D 1982
t JEPT.
V ,1
t''
OF RF
0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
r; DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING • 235-2631
Z
i MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
co-
oq
1TEO SEPSE
O
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR January 26, 1983
1
TO: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator T
R(-`
I,
l*:.*; r—•-.
FROM: Abdoul Gafour j: } . f. s{
Ir
Rezone R-024-82 Bennett/Mul ti vest 'et al
I 12838,j
r
SUBJECT:
We have reviewed the legal description of the subject rezone as sub-
mitted y the applicant; and have made the following revisions:
The description of the easements within the subject rezone areas
are deleted, since they are within the boundary of the total area. The
revised legal description is presented under. the attached Exhibit "A".
1
We also noted that Tax Lot 373 is not included in the submitted legal
description, but all the maps in the subject file include that tax lot.
1
According to King County tax roll , the owner's name and address is
Ed Porter, 4316 N.E. 4th Street, Renton.
Please verify with the applicant on this matter and notify us ofanychanges.
1:-
AG:dar
Attachment
Copy to: I r.
City Clerk
15P Qi=1e i sep Ze PTIv AT Sal 01.4 J a l- cliEs
EIcNIAiT i1'
a b aye
g -1-83:
EXHIBIT "A" ti
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FED - 1 i983
Rezone R-024-82 Bennett-Multivest, et al
BIIILC;3,Zvi;'Si:; DEi'i,
Revised 8/1/83
PARCEL P
The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 23
North, kange 5 East, W.M. :
EXCEPT the North 629 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the West 305 feet of the South 65 feet of the North 694 feet of said sub-
division1;
AND EXCEPT the Southerly 629 feet of the Westerly 396.4 feet of said subdivision;
AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows:
Beginning at a point 30 feet North of the Southeast corner of said West 1/2 of the
Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 10; thence West 250 feet; thence
North 430 f et; thence East 250 feet; thence South 436 feet to the point of beginning;
AND EXCEPT he Southerly 42 feet of said subdivision for S.E. 128th Street as conveyed
to King Coil ty by deeds recorded under Recording Nos. 5741040 and 5741044;
AND EXCEPT he Westerly Westerly 40 feet of said subdivision for Union Avenue N.E, ;
PARCEL B
That portio of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows:
Beginning 4, feet North and 75 feet West of the Southeast corner of said West 1/2;
Thence West 175 feet; thence North 424 feet; thence East 175; thence South 424 feet
to the point of beginning;
PARCEL 6
0
The East 75 feet of the following:
Beginning 42 feet North of the Southeast corner of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4
of the Sout west 1/4 of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in Kina
County, Was ington; thence West 250 feet; thence North 424 feet; thence East 250 feet;
thence Sout 424 feet to the point of beginning;
PARCEL D
The Westt17 feet of the South 622 feet of the East half of the Southwest quarter of
the Southwe t quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , in King
County Wash'naton;
EXCEPT the outh 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by deed recorded
under Recor'ing No.
5790505j
Situated
1in
the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington
PARCEL E
i
The South 1 2 of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Southwest quarter of the
Southwest q arter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5, East, W.M. , in King Co. , WA. ,
EXCEPT the outh 622 feet of the West 175 feet, AND EXCEPT the South 470 feet thereof.
PARCEL F
The South 250 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southwest quarter of
the Southwest quarter, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King
County, Washington;
EXCEPT the lest 175 feet;
EXCEPT the outh 42 feet conveyed to King County for road under King County
Recording No. 5738286.
1
PARCEL GI
The North 110 feet of the South 360 feet of the West half of the East half of the South-
west quarter
of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M. , iniKiog County, Washington;
EXCEPT the (Jest 175 feet thereof.
Legal, Description for Subject Rezone Area s
Paget for
FEB - 1 1°o3 .
y
6U1LIJIiv;;
PARCEL H
The Sout 470 feet of the South 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Southwest
quarter if the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT tie West 175 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the South 360 feet, thereof,
7
1
ti .
iii Irdit!
30
rillEor12.6541i th
as
EI f
School Oistr,c 3
si
O.Islq. W 0
7.36 Ac. MARo
o 4
i s 2
IS.) I
p --- _3. _ R04D 547. AC- 3 1Q —
G T.
RFN T•N CO —
I' -—
tea°'—° fsMr_
61
RPORA L/MI
0 of
Lloyd V.z --= y 8 HQzel G. o
p 4 Weber
m;
i° I.s i N1.
41131RuthVentsetC.I C.
Williams a1 11
i'niJ09.:.>
Donold E.
lyo
r' 0.53gc
I •
0.94A
Mc'NI/looms
5`
9asl0.93Ac.
3t4.J1J09.44 !
606
Charles Rucker I•W. CaruerUe
en J. David Jensen I
8 m
T
19
9 I_
J;t)i 114 I I.:
i AC.
LI
m
om` Or:
I T I
2_ — ' 1'
O1'
q
37X
m NiA175CDI15Jo
avl
I 1.02af.36o:
y c Ansents. r.
IId24.90i r IjQI• so 1
I
Q.36.a.
N IC*
I175 75 I:sa1 i Q U
13
J f 1 r-
Q
IIIJr*, IIW P; J,++
c 1, 3 o I,
ill
n•
f
n I
JL--JrJ
T^ `
I
fil
414
CI
o
f 0:3at
13
I
3 []
V
K
4.
N: ti:)
I
Q
T ®
1,
O
LNet
11
as
o
LI z-
r .
a )
1
o
Q 0.3
stiu
c
v C 4 Is0
h
Y j I u i
14
I
I
W I
cif
1
a
i fi
Q.
21/.43 1
t' I 0.7i A o o_} o
r E-
T
s
M
t8
P
ey
OLL MAP j
COMPANY, INC. S ATTLE
Blow
OR
REPRODUCTION /N WHOLE
P
200 FT. ' C®PYRIGHT KROLL MAP
FOR PERSONAL USEO 4vl"
GCOMPqNYINCRESALE/S PROHIBITED BYLAWI
I COUNTY TAX LOT N
P
t h f._I . ti• ; y_
r "cif_.,.•
i s `: L'
r
i
a
4 ,i
4' f.
Y .. ";_... ;_. .:.,i.IK -A,'
fi!', l.41
dp.t,
t" '-,
r- ...
Y
C ° ,
i a :'
a '' _ <
OF R4,
4?
f
A
OFFICEUOFFICE
OF THE CITY ATTORNEY. RENTON,WASHINGTON
o 4), z
POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678
LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
9,
0
Oe DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
OigT g
Q
July 29, 1983 MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
FD SEP1 ZANETTA L.FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
0: WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
ROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Bennett - Multivest Rezone
Gentlemen:
have been presented with a Deed, policy of title
insurance and a re-recorded Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants from! Bennett - Multivest. It would appear to
Vie, from a brief review of the legal descriptions
ontained in those documents that Bennett - Multivest
as title to the second parcel of property that was
rot included in the restrictive covenants. As you
may recall, the Council decided that the first parcel,
he Water District parcel, was not necessary as an
inclusion in the restrictive covenants, but the second
arcel was necessary. Subject to conformation by the
ngineering Department, as to the legal description, it
ould appear to me that the problems with the second
arcel would be removed and this ordinance may be placed
n second and final reading.
awrence J. arren
JW:bjm
Ned for HOCOrn at nuyua l our
t• ` ' Fit -- AMERI AN TITLE
4:-ClF .Fa t I hi I.LRr1..i IA. r., VI 1
L
M.1 f a. WA. Y81 I
o-
t '•
1
DECIARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVJ NAt7 S I •'
11
y 11
r .
1 yI
I3 I 8 7'
1, .
r.
v 11 , 1' ,
u J'
WHEREAS, De be C. Bennett and his wife Bette Bennett, I•' ;, ;' '
Corporation, Odyssey Development Corporation, Multivest LTD, and King County','.',,- : :' r•/_,1`M'?r
Water District . 90 are the owners of the following real property in the • ' ``'• ; i ' 1 `i;,1 I CiiiC
ei y of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows; '
t) cipr
i LEGAL DESCRIPTION i'W, ``
r'
Reed
D PARCEL A:
li
3 D 7R
0 or R,corTheWesthoftraSouthwest4 •of the Southwest h of Section 10, Town 2ctiaasNorth, Range 5East, W:M. ;
Exusn the Nora.,' 629 feet the:eof;
AND EXCEPT the West 3C5 feet of the South 65 teet of the North 694 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the Southerly 629 feet of the Westerly 396.4 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT that Portion thereof 'described as tollows:
Beginning at a pLint 30 feet North of the Southeast bonier of said West 15
of the Southwest 14 of the Southwest 14 of said Section 10; thence West 250
feet; .
thence North 436 feet;
thence.East 250 eet;
thennce South 436 feet to the point of beginning;
AND EXCEPT the most Southerly 42 feet thereof for S.E. 128th St. as coveyed
to King County deeds recorded under Recording Nos. 5741040 and 5741044;
AND I' the , st• Westerly 40 teet thereof for, Union Avenue N.E. ;
u
PARCEL .B;,' 1,
That portion Of the West 1 of the Southwest 14 of the Southwest h of Section
4.0, Township 33 North, Range 5 East, W.M. described as follows:1
Beginning 42 feet North and 75 feet,West, of the' Southeast come. of 'paid West; ,
thenceWest 175 Peet;
thence North 4241feet;-
thence East 175 feet; i
theta South 424 feet to the point of beginnin
I . •
PARCEL C:
The Bast 75 feet of the following: ?
Beginning 42'feet North of the Southeast corner Of the West 15 of the Southwest .
Vof the Southwe t i of Se tion 10, Township 23 North, Range. 5•E?st, W.M.
in King County, ashington;•
thence West 250 eet;
thence North 424 feet;
thence East 250 eet;
thence South 424 feet to the point of beginning; •
PARCEL D:
The West 175 feet of the South 622 feet of the East half of the Southwest
quarter of the uthwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5
i • ''4,I,..1,?•, ' '
FastW.M, , in g County, Wash.nli I11,,•• `
EXCEPT the South. 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by deed
reoe_xded under R" rding No. 579i505.
Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington
PARCEL E:1
Ti,e South 'S of the West 1 of the East k of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest
quarter of Sect' 10, TMTownship23North, Range 5, East W. . , in King County,
Washington, except the South 622 feet of the West 175 teet, and except the
South 470 feet f. •
gefi3•ier with an'eascn;nt i,,,- ingress arxi egress "15 feet Li- . .ne width across,
aver,and '•• the West t of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter
of the Southwest quarter of said Section 10, the centerline.ot which is described
as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner or said Section 10; thence
oath 881 02' 3" East 821.38 feet; thence North 0' 17'32" West 42 fee to the point
of beginning; thence North 0 17 32 West 580 feet to the terminus of said line;
except that iron thereof included in the nereinabove described main tract.
PARCII, F: ;
TY@ South 250 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southwest quarter
of the
Sout
st quarter, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 1ast, W.M.
in-King Coon , Washington;
EXCEPT the i Weat 175 feet;
EXCEW theSaith 42 feet conveyed to King County. under King County Recording
No: 5738286.
1
PARCEL G:
The North 110 feet of the South 36u feet of the-West half of the East half
of- the Sou ! st quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township
n
23 North, Range 5 Eadt, W.M. , in King County, Washingtran; FAT the West
p 175 feet thereof; TOGETHER with an easement for ingress and egress of 15
teet in width over, across and upon the following described real estate in
43 King County, Washington: Over the South 220 teet of the West half of the
East half of he Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10,
n hTownship23N W.,
C,acm
Range 5 East M. , in King County, Washington, the centerline
0 of which is tined as follows: encing at the Southwest corner of said
4p Section 10; South 88' 02'43" East 821.38 feet; thence North 0'17'32"
West 30 feet the point of beginning; thence North 0'17'32" West 220 feet.
I
PARCEL EL::
i
The South 470 eet of the South t of the West t of the East h of the Southwest
quarter of Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5
East, W.M.," King County, Washington; EXCEPT' the West 175 feet thereof and
EXCEPT the•Sout 360.feet thereof err,d-!XCE T U c East 50 fect of the North
G
Together with easement 15 feet in width tor roadway and utlities across,.
over and upon West h of th Southeast quarter of the southwest quarter
of the Southwe quarter of said Section 10, the centerline of which is described
as follows:]
Beginning at Southwest corner of said Section 10; thence South 88'02'
43" East 821.3: feet; thence North 0'17'32" West 42 feet to the point of
beginning; ; - - North 0'17'32" West 580 feet to the terminus of said line;
EXCEPT that, .. ••, thereof included in hereinabove described main tract.
Max lot 333, . • . section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M.)
Building Setbacks for Primary Shopping Center Structure
Puture expansi on of a primary shopping center structure eastward from the
Safeway store Shall provide a Setback line that is ca patible with a unified
shopping cell development approach, whole providing architectural and design
flexibility
Landscape Buffer
A minimum ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer together with a site dbscuring
fence shall'.be provided along the North property line, and a minimum ten (10)
foot wide ' pe buffer shall be provided along the East property line.
Such buffers shall be installed as part of site development consistent with
the extent of site development' phasing. If adaitional property to the East
is inoorpora =• in the shopping center concept the Easterly bufter may be
moved Eastward consistent with such potential future expansion.
fi`!•':^
Nr_
ti"
DUIZATI 1
These ooverian s shall run
with
the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If
at any time irprovements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion
of the is pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required
1
by the Or' s of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity
of per tation. Any amendments or modifications of this agreement
1
z1a, be vali4 only.if mutually:agreed upon by the City of Renton and the
Owners (including heirs, successors, and assigns to the owners) in writing
and recorded with the King County Department of Records and Elections.
educes the Superior Court of King County may beinstigatedPxer1Pam, in
by either •the Chit or Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property •
Who are adversely atfected by any violation or breach of these restrictive ' '
ID-covenants.:sonable attorney's fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding
will be borne by the parties wham the court determines are in error andshall43
n be enteredlas a judgment in such action.
7y` -` e (
y r '•sc}, -rtc!e
frity - ---t--:: Am. 7
a- .-
liF
t.
i
s L. Magstadt
Land
t
on Devel t
dr, ,
41111#L
p
1 s OwenPresidentBetteCharles
Odyssey Develognent Corp.
r
0.0,411
ivest LTD.
1
State of
i
r
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
I. ss.
County of King
On this 30th day of March 19 83 , before me personally'appeared
Cheryl A. Henry to me known to be the individual who executed the ,
foregoing instrument as Attorney in Fact for Delbert C. Bennett and Bette A. Bennett
and acknowledged that She signd the same as her free and voluntary act and deed as Attorney in Fact
for said principal!for'the•usrs and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that the Power of Attorney authorizing
the execut4ori)f,th siitrujnetjt has, of been revoked and that said principal is now living and is not insane .
GIYEN 4i0d4. y hand and official seal the day and year l, tten.
C.
1''• Notary Publi n and for Me State of Was ington,
rsrding at
ACKNOWLFD fNENT---ATTORNEY IN FACT J
FIRST AMER AN.TITLE COMPANY
WA—47 'hh,.,
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing in' •
1'11
1? ;
i '^ j•_
I
f
Z
t/,•
day of J19 (3, before me per illy appeared
r"1'12S
n
j • the personwhoexecutedCorp.,
Ile Corporate representative of• Landon Development
t and acknowledged said instrnumnt to be
the within and foregoing
instrumen ,
the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned.
N vairmsS W u3+•+DSF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical seal
the da and yea for the above written.
M
Nl1IINiq,,,;
p,'
4'4.1.. .Allialiiiri` l is in'and for the State
zoi:IT, ,fit
vl
I• .
gton, residing in " tiJ—"it
j,,•. , ..•
i q.,1-' 6L4A,/ pp03 before me personally appearedtheOnthis . I Y of 19 Pam'
004porate representative of Odyssey Development Corp. , the person who executed
the within and.foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be
the free and Voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes
I
t
therein mentioned. j
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ny offical seal.
the pay and year for the above written.
f
7------
i• `.' i
I•
Y •';'';; °
eta L_Public in and forkor...
4.A
to
4
t ...
tit; of Washington esitling
1... -..Ze.0 i••• 0.* ,...(iii._•
r n
A
Q 1 19 , before mepersonallyappearedOnthis1dayot,
the Corporate representativeiof Multivest Development Corp., the person who
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and adknowleged said instrument
to be the fr€e and voluntary act and deed of said person tor the uses and
purposes - -mentioned.
IN WIZ S 'N•"• , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical s' ,
the Clay and fear for the above written.
1..} .f ,'
e'. .6":----!....:
fr
t:'
w
Notary aic in and for - State
7 of Wa ' •gton, residing in
ter
1 o THE RENTON CITYCOUNCILV \/ 1 .;
Z NAL k'',;\ o MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 . 235-2586
90 co-
09qtED SEP1c_
July 14, 1983
Mr. Mike Smith
Bennett-Multivest
1234 South 3rd
Rento , WA 98055 f;
RE: ennett-Multives,t Rezone, R-024-82
Dear r. Smith:
The City of Renton, in checking the legal description of the signatures
on;
thr
restrictive covenants of the subject rezone, has determined that
not only Water District #90 did not sign the restrictive covenants, but
anothller small parcel likewise did not sign. Since the City Council has
waived the signature of Water District #90 only and not this other parcel ,
no further action will be taken on the rezone until correctly signed and
filed restrictive covenants have been presented to the city.
The Ways and Means Committee of the Council has set a deadline of July 29,
1983 for presentation of this material to the city. If it is not presented,
the city will consider the rezone application as lapsed.
Very truly yours ,
QCGGI I-yteG
G-a')
Lawrence J. Warren
City Attorney
LJW:bd
cc:. City Cler
earing Examiner
Policy Development
Building and Zoning
WEEWays-
and Means CommitteeoWMayor
a
1 JUL I 4, 1983i
CITY CLERK
II
II
OF ,
16 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552
o rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055.
0-
9 GD.
11
0947.E0 SEP1 ‘
4%.e'.
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH j
r- MAYOR
j
June 23, 1 83
The Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Members of Renton City Council
Renton,, Washington
RE: Be ett-Multivest Rezone, R-024-82 - Discrepancies in Application Information
and Covenants j q
Dear Mayo- and Council Members:
City staff, in reviewing the restrictive covenants submitted by the applicant, have found a
number, of discrepancies of which you should be aware before passage of an ordinance
reclassifying the applicant's property. I1'
You are already aware of th'e fact that,' while the applicant submitted an affidavit (see
attachment 1) attesting to ownership of the entire acreage portions, the property proved,
in fact, to be owned by Water!District 90.11
Therefore, the applicant could not execute covenants conditioning uses of that property;
and the property's owner, the!Water District, chose not to join in execution.
it
The covenants which the applicant has submitted remain unclear as to whether they do or,
in fact, can restrict the Water District property. Further, after review of the legal
boundaries of the applicant's! proposed shopping center, it is apparent that the applicant
submitted both plot plans and boundary maps which included additional property which is
not owned by the applicant. 1
While the legal description submitted by the applicant did not include this property, the
maps relie on by staff in reviewing the request were inaccurate. As a result, the review
failed to t ke account of Parcel 373, 431'li6 N.E. 4th Street, (see map) which would remain
an island of unprotected and isolated single family residential zoning in the midst of a B-1
District: shopping center.
The applic nt, through inadvertence, failed to note this in any presentation and permitted
the staff to overlook this important aspect of the request.
j I
l
II
I;
I 1
I
The Honor ble Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Members of Renton City Council
June 23, 1983
Page 2 1
I
11
The applic nt, therefore, cannot speak ifor either the Water District property or this
additional roperty. Any covenants which run with the land cannot be used to protect
either the City's interest in well planned development, or without modification can the
applicant's covenants protect the island of single family zoning.
The ordinance and covenants as written did not consider the excluded property, and any
further'action by you should consider this fact.
I
Very y yours,
II
II
1
avid . Clemens
Policy Devi lopment Director 1
DRC:FT;K:vn
0183G
Attachments I'
ri
i
II
l
I
j I
I
II
I
1'
I
Ns7Y3R. W
fk':
P
t4 "0r
1
BU1L ivG/2UN1NG DEPT.
j, :I01 B(Mil rc t ,
am t e owner o t e
prioperty involve In thbeing duly sworn,
declare thatIforegoinigstatementsandanswershereincontainedlandttheandionthattheherewithsubmittedare' in all respects true and correct to theinformationmyknowledgeandbelief.
best of
Subscribe
and Sworn before me
this
day of_
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
C
Name--o ary Pu c ,
Signature o er
Address) 7
17422 - 108th Ave. SE Suite200Address
Renton, Washington98055Ca.ty)
State
255-9448 -.
Telep one
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing
application has been inspected bymeandhasb,eeg
found to beIthorough and complete in every particular andtoconformtotherulesandregulationsoftheRentonPlanningoverning. the filing of ' s;uch application. 9 Department
Date Received
19_ B y:
Renton Planning Dept.
2-73
30
i 31
4.Li, —1»av& ,
1
vi'-
7}1111 w m
f h.
ia cr
i .. ___.._._._---- —A is ,W'eLP: —-
t `-. —_—._—.__ •. - — l— --- — _-
5,n n- —, I .
i
t•
r
1 -',
I
1.
a v
@
R rim
r '
r4 1
1 -•
i:ti.
0 C\•. '
I! 0,1 L,....
rN L. 1 t
II
I ram
i i •lr tf\,S P i
Y.`.
I\\\\
i‘•<\ .klikii . : ers—
j . . i I
i a.
1 ; I (.."
s
4
i 10\
1•ii , ;
s..., ....,.,
I • .. . • • •
i•Ii— 1\k'
fo:
11...,,,
H . • • .
L--.4\ ---\-..
I.
i 19 •
G4,.\\*\f.
k •
11
i -
A '',,,,. ,, ,
9- e t 1
t l
f
1
t Z
I t...
s
e
bl..s
It
t•
S
t1
t'•' t
t
w•—r
tt I i
1
I
O
M. ' 1HBVIIIE. 13 •• •E ''
MAR 19 1982
BUIL®!!VG/ZONING DEPT.
c. i —13)-tVd \
7/
41:
I.-........._..... -T..... . .._.....„„„,,,,,... , _
ties
L
s. —' -
r.:.^
i•,_.•-
j,
s.:f• 7 1
t p.1si i f'
4:1 t I.
i J- Wit'7
a I I . 1
41
i
4-- IT tfr ..., ...,
7
3
I
og a .
07
t 11;
1.
4 N 4 „e
I
7417,..• it:=-//
i; ,-;,."--
r. --2-.---._ .
1-
i, .
Y,-:-,--7r kill*
7.."."'-'
r -
r ter—
iirtiil. 1
it .. •
t-rt
dI
g
J 4::
I Ri
sfi
1.1 4
1
11
IN
L1.1_:-__.1. ''.-
ow
i
ir
0 serid
izi41
t.i. ....i:,..;
7
1 ,
cif 4,
3. 1 .,21-,-;:_iA7p '
L a .14tA,,zi
i i=irr.f.r--,' _
It..--,_r'r.-,--74k''''-
7.:.-
7-*
11. . .:,...,..:
e_.-`.:4.
4,44.a.›,..4seet..,.:16.:"-set* .,_ -. It :
D 1-,' tiD,
1;:- [
I qi.
IAR 11) 1982
i QEPT.
Z
I NTEROFF I CE ME-w. 0
TO: Maxine Mo:or - City Clerk DATE: 6-20-83
FROM: Abdoul Gafour - Engineering Dept.
SUBJECT:
Rezone R-024-82 Bennett-Multivest, Et Al .
Per your request attached please find the legal description presented under Exhibit "A"
for the ordinance of the subject rezone along with a vicinity map for your usage.
Please also note that there is a tax lot 373 which is not included in the rezone area.
Please refer to my memo dated January 26, 1983 concerning this omission (copy attached)
and verify it with Roger Blaylock before recording the ordinance.
0
I 7 7FF
Very Truly Yours ,
CITY CLERK
I
IofR4
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
U `$ © Z
DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 235-2631
WL MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
Q0,
94reo sE1,1°°
BARBARA Y. SHINPICH
MAYOR January 26, 1983
TO: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
FROM: AbdoullGafour
SUBJECT: Rezone'R-024-82 Bennett/Multivest et al
We have reviewed the legal description of the subject rezone as sub-
mitted by, the applicant and have made the following revisions:
The description of the easements within the subject rezone areas
are deleted, since they are within the boundary of the total area. The
revised legal description is presented under the attached Exhibit "A".
We also noted "that Tax Lot 373 is not included in the submitted legal
description, but all the maps in the subject file include that. tag lot..
According to King County' tax roll , the owner's name and address is
Ed Porter, 4316 N.E. 4th Street, Renton.
Please verify with the applicant on this matter and notify us of any
changes.
AG:dar
Attachment
Copy to:
City Clerk
I
1
EXHIBIT "A"
j
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Rezone R-024-82 Bennett-Multivest, et al
PARCEL A.
The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 23
North, Rage 5 East, W.M. :
EXCEPT the North 629 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the West 305 feet of the South 65 feet of the North 694 feet of said sub-
division;
AND EXCEPT the Southerly 629 feet of the Westerly 396.4 feet of said subdivision;
AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows:
Beginning at a point 30 feet North of the Southeast corner of said West 1/2 of the
Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 10; thence West 250 feet; thence
North 436 feet; thence East 250 feet; thence South 436 feet to the point of beginning;
AND EXCEPT the Southerly 42 feet of said subdivision for S.E. 128th Street as conveyed
to King County by deeds recorded under Recording Nos. 5741040 and 5741044;
AND EXCEPT the Westerly Westerly 40 feet of said subdivision for Union Avenue N.E.;
PARCEL B
That portion of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows:
Beginning 42 feet North and 75 feet West of the Southeast corner of said West 1/2;
Thence West 175 feet; thence North 424 feet; thence East 175; thence South 424 feet
to the point of beginning;
PARCEL C
The East
r
5 feet of the followirfg:
Beginning42 feet North of the Southeast corner of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4
of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King
County, Washington; thence West 250 feet; thence North 424 feet; thence. East 250 feet;
thence South 424 feet to the point of beginning;
PARCEL D
The West 175 feet of the South 622 feet of the East half of the Southwest quarter of
the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M., in King
County Washinaton;
EXCEPT the South 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by deed recorded
under. Recording No. 5790505.
Situated in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington
PARCEL E
The South 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Southwest quarter of the
Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5, East, W.M., in King Co., WA
EXCEPT the South 622 feet of the West 175 feet, AND EXCEPT the South 470 feet thereof.
PARCEL F
The S®utti 250 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southwest quarter of
the Southwest quarter, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King
County, Washington;
EXCEPT the West 175 feet;
EXCEPT the South 42 feet conveyed to King County for. road under King County
Recording No. 5738286. 1
PARCEL G
The North 110 feet of the South 360 feet of the West half of the East half of the South-
west quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M. , i King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the West 175 feet thereof.
Jr
Legal Description for Subject Rezone Area
Page 2
I '
PARCEL EN
The South 470 feet of the South 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Southwest
quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M. , in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT :thy West 175 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the South 360 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the East 98 feet of the North 60 feet thereof.
I I
17 l '
Tim
a
s.
I • •
x•.
A
mi
CITY OF RENTON
v
r
DtPARTM[NT OR PUBLIC WORKS
REZONE R. 024-82
1.
0
At; g_Zoo'
0 i _ '' 13ENNE1T- -MULTIVE5T ,E1 AL.
to »..., ..
ry w0. •Mr44 aw...--•--„• "',
s'i't
IONta
DAn
6-83
PIL[NOi
DRAWNhk
CN[CKtD
1CM• IN = 2b0`
pI ••o PMc
w
APPROV[O
NttT ^-
iit li
M C
a ; ld
1 _
rl
S
1 ;
t
1 C
I• •i ,... _
L_..,_:___ _„„...„.,,
Mier
iLO, 1
r• 1'1 J
t
M
ill
a
1ttier«. tad 11
flllrs
Q y
p/
11
1
Y
u.
AP.I r
y',•,.: ._,.. -
M __
L.4ws
ar
a• won.. Ps.w ii•r
a
J.
kgS4.: cc ..
i
i.-
ti - x.70,4,„ ,
la
seLI1 - j ;. jai
la
11.!_DIif /"
4:1•F I
01. •
4:
I.r
P-
F
y
1 S ' 1OL 1 r 'r'. 001.®, aaa.--
n
1
1 hl.c,
P
I
I i
67,,,,.it : ' i ••
1.
am/
CIr'•
E /Pant ST
F: 1.a.
r rn...14,Aw 41.e.v 'P.P. -4•ab
5
i _
JP.
b - ,
IC.,....
Au. •f:.•04 a PARA..... GS.. Ps... IV•..... NW 13.... —S
T' •
JfIL1P i+w•i Mi .
I . -- I
I
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
JUNE 20, 1983
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second
and Ifinal reading:
Minietta Rezone (R-013-83)
I
The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first
reading:
Amending Portion of Section 4-2204 Relating to Fire Lanes
Bennett Multivest Rezone (R-024-83)
The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading
and adotion :
FuL Transfer for Police Arbitration Award
Earl ', Clymer, Chairman
oci2cc3) -- A,WI
Ri and Stredicke
ri;4P/22a.-
Rob Hug es
I
I I
I
ft
Renton City Council
June 20, 198
Page Three
ORDINANCES A D RESOLUTIONS continued
Minietta Rez•ne R-013-83. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT
continued THE ORDINANCE AS' PRESENTED. Councilman Stredicke objectedto
rezone to B-1 category due to inconsistency with other zoning
classifications in the general vicinity and in view of
imposition of restrictive covenants prohibiting commercial
developmlent. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, ROCKHILL,
HUGHES, CLYMER. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
recommending the following ordinances for first reading:
Fire Lane An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 4-2204 of
Revision Title IV _(Building Regulations) relating to fire lanes. MOVED
BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO
COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
Bennett-M An ordinancewas, read changing the zoning classification of
Vest Rezone property located on the north side of .N.E. 4th Street
R-'3;' approximately 950 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. from General
Classification District (G-1) and Residence District (R-3) to
Business District (B-1 ) for Bennett-Multivest, et al . , File
No. R-024-83) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER
THIS MATTER BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE' WEEK TO ALLOW REVIEW
OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT REZONE SITE. CARRIED.
Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report
recommending the following resolution for reading and adoption:
Resolution #2515 A resolution was read authorizing fund transfer from Contingency
Fund Transfer Fund to the Current Fund/Police Department budgets to provide
for Police for certain pay adjustments and benefit increases received from
Arbitration Police arbitration award -($171 ,9b5.00) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED
Award BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED: - CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Council President Trimm announced an Executive Session regarding
Executive! Session labor negotiations as last item on the agenda.
Park and Ride Councilman Stredicke advised the State Department of Transportation
Lot - Highlands is no longer pursuing plans to locate a Park and Ride lot at the
Highlands Community Church site; but will report back to Council
following review of other alternative locations in the Highlands.
Open Space Citing recent newspaper article regarding reclassification by King
Classification County Assessor Harley Hoppe of Longacres Race Track to open space
Longacres1Race category Councilman Stredicke requested investigation of the
Track matter. Mayor Shinpoch agreed to research whether or not the
designation has been changed, and, if so, whether or not the
King County Assessor has authority for approval of the revision.
ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch announced annual challenge from the Senior Citizen
REPORT Sluggers to Mayor, City Council , and Administrative staff at
Softball Game 4th of July softball game and celebration at Liberty Park.
Executive Session MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL GO INTO EXECUTIVE
SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Time: 9: 10 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all
Time: 10:05 '.m. Council members present. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY HUGHES,
COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED.
114"4-°('€),>221
MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk
1
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1984 - 1989'•
AS AMENDED AT PUBLIC HEARING 6/20/83
CITY
PRI6ITY # ANNUAL ELEMENT PROJECTS
1 Grady Way Bridge Replacement
2 Renton Area Transportation Study
3 , Wells Avenue Bridge Replacement
4 Garden Ave. N, N 4th St. to N 8th St.
15 SWGrady Way, Lind Ave. SW to Longacres Dr.
6 NE 3rd St./NE 4th St. , Sunset Blvd. N to Union Ave. NE
17 Talbot Road S, S 16th St. to S 41st St.
8 N 1st St. , Park Ave. N to Eurnett Ave. N
9 S 2nd St. & Burnett Ave. S Intersection
3011 Rainier Ave. S, S Grady Way to Airport Way
ILY/Z SW Sunset Blvd., Rainier Ave. S to Stevens Ave. SW
3z/3 Miscellaneous Street Improvements
la 14- Lind Ave. SW, SW 16th St. to SW Grady Way
SECOND YEAR PROJECTS
Y4 16 Rainier Ave. S & S Grady Way Intersection
tm J ) Monroe Ave. NE, NE 6th St. to NE 12th St.
16 SW 16th St., Lind Ave. SW to Monster Road SW
THIRD YEAR PROJECTS
17 S 7th St. , Rainier Ave. S to Smithers Ave. S
18 Oaksdale Ave. SW, SW Grady Way to I-405
19 Oaksdale Ave. SW, SW 16th St. to SW 34th St.
FOURTH - SIXTH YEAR PROJECTS
20 Oaksdale Ave. SW, SW 16th St. to SW Grady Way
21 Lake Washington Blvd. N, N Park Dr. to City Limits
22 SW 27th St., Oaksdale Ave. SW to West Valley Road
23 SE Puget Dr. , Jones P1. SE to Edmonds Ave. SE
24 Monster Road SW - Alternate Access
25 Sunset Blvd. NE, I-405 to NE Park Dr.
I26 Taylor Ave. NW, Renton Ave. Ext. to Stevens Ave. NW
27 NE 12th St., Lynnwood Ave. NE to Union Ave. NE
28 Union Ave. NE, NE Sunset Blvd. to NE 24th St.
29 Edmonds Ave. Extension
30 N/NE 3rd St. - I-405 Undercrossing
31 Union Ave. SE, NE 4th St. to SE 4th St.
32 Miscellaneous Railroad Xing Improvement
6/16/83
i
i 1 I 1 Th
I
f
i o
1
t E i ° t 1
I
i1_ C:-'i L; r
lui2`..
i. C,,11 1T C E01 : r, i._ t: 1: i G S 1: , t
t I g •_ k i
r, , '
1 ., 1 7J1r A`.El SE 1.
1
i s C" '; '.". 1.:4 rii,
960 j c, ifi:° F! 1:- FT % Q.,i C ki '
i
sxl'N,
sc.', ; -`.
2- "* 9` 633 ct
i i
i t'
165rniii
1 11! C Fi s i s
11iiL i42aD AVE SE F SW Y/L Of F: /4 LFLJ N
P #:.
i3
E 0 1 r N y' 9 I , ,
LL .
y rs M'
MOOR td
r fy^.
fb -tee... - L tl...t
1
F.,G ` _
A CIRN 6E,;.tY..o-
s t.
t3'e"
RENTON WA 055 110 FT LEA "5 1 F'o L::'. GC r.:', " i
Li
1G— 305 9 73 G C.1T4 2'Y 21C
p!
g'^. i
t -i5102305-9373-06 , 2
E0380 E 95 FT OF W ?.73 FF,QF 1 E' FT i ` i t i
HL
i 3 i r s
STEP, E`
OF S 470 FT CF W 1/2 OF E 1/2 OF i
RE,6 NE A7N Si
96055 5W 1/4 OF SW 1/4 i
10565
t
RENTOk WA j t
I21l10-23 05 937G 09.174 2 T 21 i 4R:,-. •10""''
INC "T P:.R SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4
ITXACGINCTAXDLPTE1'3350 WILSNIRE RLVU RN 1010 Cy 7q.' AT S'd" G::'. SLR ST': Tii N
LOS ANGELES CA 90010 0-25-13 4' N.!,,. W t.'•i t:`:.O4 FT
TN S 87 ",; E FLU S t.N SD
I.
i
SL?Da4' i'vF1 Ft) 9''iOF El1GNOF t i t
Ui 1^.'. AVE NE U'?TI T(E N MGN
t I r, r i
F Wi 4Tk Si S TF. TF N
i
i3
c
iI 1 1 •1,
L2`. 13 W G E Mg /58 FT TN S "
d8-0 -55 E 142 FT T;; S 0-25-13 Ig 3 •
E 15ii FT TO SD N MCI Of NE 4TN S
I it
TH N 83-02— 8 W ALG SD Ft MGM i ,
11142FTTOIP(' i r F I
102305-9375-041 10-23-
0 9 75 09 633 •2 T 434
FLFTCHER WENDELL Z1177 12
O.FT OF N SO 'T OF E 1/Z Of
r, E• , '-.;
6
16 SE 147TM S W 1/4 OF SE °'• Of SW 1/4 LESS 1 T
Y F
RENTON WA 1 96055E 50 iFT T 43 -
x7; I
TrFA. r " 4
a.
N
z
i4.
102305-9376-0 10723-05 9376 09.633 T '.g- 1 ` 1
TCHER WE EL.W N 50IFT OF E 1/2 Of SW 1/4 Of 1 7 '.3" ' . E' 1°r'. P. 1 `'
16 SE 1471M SE 1/,4 Of SW 1/4 LESS E 250 FT
RENTCf WA 96055 1 I/ i ,_
102305-9377-02 10-z 5 9377 09.633 T 434... " • I
FICOFE SCOTT 77,50 FT OF W 155 FT N
Sr'
5f,,
13208 RENTON,AVE S 124 FT Of S 154 FT OF
1
1/2 Of
r
1/2I
K
RENTON VA 9i035 S OF SW OF NW /4 Of
EKE !!
k3h 1, E
4 i
102305-'9!78-01` 10- 5 97,
RENT : CONG tU J-:11ONANS WITNESS 2
FT OF N 23P Y CF E 1/2 OF
C/0 P: ::CK .J CA_LANAN Of NE 1/: G kJ 1/4 LESS
3706 O. 1OTNi
12 FT Of W 14':.P. FT LESS CO
RENT? R 96055 :1) ESF4i Ti,>.':" LN R/W i
10250S-.9 79-0ID 10-23-05
7 07.4515 :' T 415:: ,"k i
L +if1.1 ROT' C 100760 '• §.1 FT OF FCC"r.-^:.5 31) FT F• fr 3a .
11636 1321e SE 1 .79 F T S '`' F. ".: " L" S+:C i
RENTCK W 96056 ' + TE,'c. 6Z5.j Fi Ta C 151.31 FT i
TH 1 625.C6 FT T:: F; 131.36 F
i ''G LESS E 167 FT IE_f3W35.'56FT
0-23.•)S c: 07,.633 2,7 .3J1 1,•.,-.
1MCD 1EI. T 1/2 Of SE 1.'`Rc t- 1/<4 I 1 t -:.
T
PO 60AE Z 375 Fr ; N L;;. S.., .•. ..S, 1
REN ON WA i 9A055 '•;' . 2
r, , .,.
t
LL ¢f 13-apt ".i: 0 t
1 76 f T T''
i 1....f
71'1 FT TH 1 D-i'-
f•: W,
th N i Fi t
7O.7S F T TO N LN E.' i; !
ak _ - r E t : C 1 ' ' V
f: •
a _ - , '
I
1
PMRY P ` ff - ,
A ,1=_ -'f 2 I w
M i,
1
J
IC 1
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY.. RENTON,WASHINGTON
U ,• 4 I POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678
Z o
ma
LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITYATTORNEYO9AODAVIDM. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITYATTORNEY0'
9qT 0P
1 MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
SEPt
May 26, 1983 ZANETTA L.FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
TO: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Rezone Ordinance - Bennett-Multivest R-024-82
Dear Maxine :
Enclosed please find the original of a proposed Ordinance
as above captioned. Upon receipt of a copy of the
Restrictive Covenants , please forward copies of this
Ordinance to 'the Ways and Mea Committee.
awrence J. ' ren
LJW:nd
Encl.
cc : Mayor
City Council
I
Q_
I I
I ,
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM
GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G-1) AND
RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1)
R-024-82 -Bennett-Multivest, et al)
WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of
Ordinance No. 1628 entitled "Code. of General Ordinances of the City of
Renton" , .s amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction
therewith the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned
as Generai Classification District (G-1) and Residence District (R-3) ; and
WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of
said prop rty has been filed with the Building & Zoning Department on
or about March 19, 1982, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing
Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing
having been held thereon on or about June 29, 1982, and said matter having
been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and the Hearing Examiner
having found that with certain conditions said zoning request is in
conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the
applicants having appealed certain of those conditions to the City Council
and the City Council having modified the conditions imposed by the
Hearing Examiner, and all parties having been heard appearing in support
or in opp sition thereto , NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS :
1-
t
SECTION I : The following described property in the City of
Renton is hereby rezon d to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow
ff
specified; .subject. to the findings , conclusions and decision of .:the
Hearing xaminer dated July 21 , 1982, as modified by the City Council ;
the Bul ing and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to
change ale maps. of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said
rezoning, to-wit :
See. Exhibit i'A" attached hereto and made a part hereof
as if fully set forth herein.
Said proper y being located on North side of N.E. 4th
Street approximately 950 feet east of Union Avenue N.E. )
AND SUBJECT to that certain Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about
and reco ded in the office of the Director of Records. and Elections
Receivin No.. 8305160165 and which said Covenants are hereby
incorporited and made a part hereof as if fully set forth.
SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its
passage, approval and five days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 1983 .
Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 1983.
Barbara Y.' Shinpoch, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of ublication:
OF RSA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON
O
U 43V POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678
0
LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
A
CO' DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
09gT
D SEP
E
O MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
June 16, 1983 ZANETTA L.FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
TO: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Re: Restrictive Covenants - Multivest LTD
Dear Maxine:
Enclosed please 'find a copy of the Restrictive Covenants
as above captioned. You will note this document has been
re orded with the King County Recorder, Receiving No . 8305160165 .
072gZ0--
Lawrence J. arren
LJW:nd
Encl.
r f + il ` TITLE
1 .
fi231LDGA{TLC, ViA
t ,{
DDCLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 17,46,q1/1, . .'
r'
i t
1 WHEREAS, C. Bennett and his wife Bette Bennett, I
ti;; ' J ,,', , ,v
Corpo tioni " l',-,: ,,,1,.,+;t,'r,,} '
I'',
sey velopment CoFrarationMul.tivest LTD. din Coun r 's Corporation, and g i,,.,,,
c,
Water Distr ' No. 90 are the fawners of the following real pro r r :rr .
city of Ren Pity
ll
the.n r
IryCountyofKing, State of Washington, described ,as,follaws:. '
I
fin/
LEGAL.DESCRIPTION
D
0PAICEL A•
CO •
The West 4 of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 10, Township23North, Range 5 East, W.M.;
EXCEPT the N 1629 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the West 3C5 feet ,of the South 65 feet of the North 694 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT the Southerly 629 feet of the Westerly 396.4 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT tha portion' thereof described ,as follows:..
Beginning at
a point 30 feet North of the Southeast borner of said West4OftheSautiiwe4oftheSouthwest4ofsaidSection10; thence West250feet;
thence North 4 6 feet; .
I '; thence.East ',25'. feet; _ ' I
thencethence South 4 '6 feet to the point Of beginning;
AND EXCEPT.the I •st Southerly 42 feet thereof for S.E. 128th St. ascoveyedtoKingCounty • deeds .recorded under Recording Nos, 5741040 and 5741044;
AND EXCEPT the •
st Westerly 40 feet thereof, for, union Avenue N:E. ; •• •.
PARCEL B:
That portionjof the West a'of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest' 4 of; Section10, Township 23 North, Range. 5 East, W.M. described as follows:
Q
Beginning 421
f--
t North and 75 feet West of the' Southeast corner.of 'said West ,' . '
thence West 175 Feet;
I•
v
thence North 42, feet;
9
thence East 175 feet; . ,
5 thence South 42' feet to the: point of beginning;,.
PARCEL C:
I .
E The East 75 fee. of the following:
Beginning 42 if--t North of the Southeast .corner, Of the West 4 of theSouthwest4oftheSou ,=st 4 of Section 10,. Township 23 North, Range: 5 East, W.M. .
Cl)in King County, Washington
fthence West 250 feet;
thence North 42' feet;
thence East 250 eet;
thence South 42, feet to the point of beginning;
I
r--1
PARCEL D: j
The 'West 175 fee of the South 622 feet of the East half of the Southwest
quarter of the • thwest quarter of Section 10, 23 North
East W.M. , In ' g County, Washington;
Township Range 5
EXCEPT the South
I
I I I ,'
d .I '
Smith 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road bydeedreccorded. under 'eaording No. 5790505.
Situate in the C ty of Renton, County of King, State of Washington
i
PARCEL E:
The South 'l of '•:
e West 4 of the East 1 of the Southwest quarter of theSouthwestquarterofSectin10, Township 23 North, Range 5, East W.M. , in King County,Washington, exce the South 622 feet of the West 175 feet, and excepttheSouth470feetereof.
p
V
R-
er with an easement f .
ingress and egress -15 feet ix. .ie width across,
er and upon . he West t of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter
of the. Southwest. quarter of said Section 10, the centerline of which is described
as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said. Section 10; thence
South 88' 02'43!' East 821.38 feet; thence North 0' 17'32" West 42 fee to.the point
of beginning;_trhence North 0'171'32" West 580 feet to the terminus of said line;
except that portion thereof included in the hereinabove described main tract.
PARCEL F:
The South 250 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southwest quarter
of the Soutftwe,t quarter, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.
in-King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the West 175 feet; .
EXCEPT the South 42 feet conveyed to King County. under King County Recording
No. 5738286.
PARCEL, G:
The North 110 f t of the South 360 feet of the"West half of the East half
of the South . quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township
ul
23 North, Range 5 EaS't, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West
a 175 feet thereof;. TOGETHER with an easement for ingress and egress of 15
feet in width over, across and upon the following described real estate in
CD King County, Washington: Over the South 220 feet of the West half of the
East half of - Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10,
CD Township 23 N• , Range .5 East W.M: , in King County, Washington, the centerline
01 of which is def i ed as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said
o0 Section 10; " - - South 88' 02'13" East 821.'38 feet; thence North 0'17'32"
West 30 feetI to the point of beginning; thence North 0' 17'32" West 220 feet.
PARCEL H:
The South 470 feet of.the South ; of the West t of the East 1 of the Southwest
curter of the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5
East, W.M., in king County, Washingt ; EXCEPT the West 175 feet thereof and
EXCEPT the Sou 360 feet thereof and EXCEPT the East 98 feet of the North
60 feet thereof
Together with.' easement 15 feet in width for roadway and utlities across,
over and upon the West. 1 of tim Southeast quarter of the southwest quarter
of the Southwest quarter of said Section 10, the centerline of which is described
as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 10; thence SouthH88'02'
43". East 821.38 feet; thence North O'17'32" West 42 feet to the point of
beginning; thence North 0'17'327 West 580 feet to.the terminus of said line;
EXCEPT that po on thereof included in hereinabove described main tract.
Tax lot 333; . section 10, Township 23 North, •Range 5 East W.M.)
Building Setbacks for Primary Shopping Center Structure
Future
expansion of a primary stropping center structure eastwa±d fran the
Safeway store 1 provide a setback line that is ccirpatible with a unified
shopping center development approach, while providing architectural and design
flexibility.
Landscape Buffer
A minimum ten '( 0) foot wide landscape buffer together with a siteobscuringfenceshallbeprovidedalongtheNorthpropertyline, .and a miniraun ten (10)
foot wide landscape buffer shall be provided along the East property line.
Such buffers shall be installedias part of site development consistent with
the extent of sate development phasing. If additional property to the East
is incorporated in the shopping center concept the Easterly buffer may be
roved Eastwarid ..nsistent with sudh potential future expansion.
r
DURATION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If
at any t Me inlprovements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion
oonofthe is pertaining to the specificinstalledl it rovements as required
by the Oridninces of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity
of further
d
tation. Ai}y amendments or modifications of thisagreementdicurmn
shall be val only if mut nall
l ly agreed upon by- the City of Renton and the
Owners (including heirs, successors, and assigns to the owners) in writing
and recorded with the King County Department of Records and Elections.1
Proper legal ,
t edures in
the Superior Court of King County may be instigated
by either ,th city ot Renton or any property owners adjoining subject 'property
who are actver
ly affected by any violation or breach ot these restrictive
D covenants. _
sonable attorney'sey's fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding
will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall
Obe enteredias a judgment in such action.
1
1
Lee
LL
r
1
I
J s L. Magstadt,
tlLandonDevel • corp.
Bette /
I_, !
1,?
frxg, - .
a eizr%,
orCharles Owen; President
Odyssey Development Corp.
01, ,,1
1 _ hest LTD.
State of Washington)
STATE OF W SHINGTON,
County of
Ki
ss.
ng
On this 30th
day of March
19 83 , before me ersonallaCherylA. Henry
y
ppearedYtomeknowntobetheindividualwhoexecutedtheforegoinginstrun}ent as Attorney in Fact for Delbert C. Bennett and Bette A. Bennettandacknowledgedthat .She signed the same as' her free-and voluntary act and deed as Attorney in
Factforsaidprincipalortheusesandupurposesthereinmentioned, and on oath stated that the Power of Attorneyauthorizingtheexecutionof, ys=n:strument has not been revoked and that said principal is now living and is not insane .
GIVEN under, m `hand.-and official seal the dayandyear 1.
F-
Y
abo e tten.
f= 4, ' L4-7,
Notary Publi "n and for the State of Was ington,
ACKNOWLEDGMENT--'ATTORNEY IN FACT r.siding at
FIRST AMERI,CAN.TITLE COMPANY .
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing in :
I
74' , 1 .-E
s . , •lt .:., " .__ "-
yv - day o ",
C-u."1.(
19 (
before me personally appeared
re Corporate presentative of .Landon Development Corp., . the person who executed
t
the within and oregoing instnment, and acknowledged said instrument to be
the free and vo untary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes
therein mention'. ,
IN WITNESS ,mr sF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical seal
the day and year for the above written.
japtir
olio in'and for the State
s .,.
gton, residing in
0 1
R7 pOnthis3O -" day of, 19 03,
before ne personallyY appeared the
corporate repres- tative of Odyssey Development Corp.,, the .person who .executed
the within and.fe egoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument tobel
the free and Voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned.
IN WIINESS
I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my off ical Pal
the day and year for the above written.
J
St!
a 3iL ia,: •'1 I
Public in and for
Washington; residing •
i 1
On this
day of, ` 19 before ne personally appeared
the Corporate rep sentative of MuIltivest Development Corp., the person who
executed the within and foregoing instr„rrent, and acknowleged said instrunent
to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and
purposes therein • tioned.
IN WITNESS WHER1OF I have
hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical seal
the day and year for the above written.
1
Notary Milo in and for .- State
of Wa • gton, residing in
Renton; City Council
May 2,, 1983
Page Two
Plannijng and intent of the Majority Report to allow completion of review by
Develo'pment the Hearing Examiner, the person best qualified to discharge
Committee; that responsibility.
Bennett-Multi-
Vest Rezone Mr. Anderson felt the 11 conditional use criteria had been
Restrictive properly addressed in the Building & Zoning Departmental staff
Covenants report, and advised the applicant had pursued compliance in all
continu d) requirements as directed by staff through the review process.
Mayor Shinpoch clarified that the Hearing Examiner had not erred,
but raher erroneous information had been provided to him. City
Attorney .Warren discussed duties of the Examiner, indicating
that because the Building & Zoning Department report had
addressed the criteria, no assumption should be made that the
Hearing Examiner had accomplished similar review. Council
discussion was then held regarding scope of the Examiner's
review, estimate of time for reconsideration should the matter
be remanded, and whether the matter had been properly addressed
in the Examiner's report.
Continue. Stanley
Piha, 300 Elliot Avenue W. , Seattle, representative of
the applicant at the prior land use hearing, recalled testimony
at the hearing had addressed the issue of the arterial access.
Councillman Stredicke requested the record reflect his opinion
that he' is simply asking for an administrative review of the
facts by the Hearing Examiner with a report back to Council
since 'the Hearing Examiner in his report had not given an
opinion on whether or not all conditions of the conditional
use permit had been met; this request would not interfere with
the filed appeal , and time of the appeal should be allowed to
run until that report is submitted to Council ; the shortage in
the setback is not the issue; and Stredicke is not opposed to
the development as proposed, but if an argument were to be made,
approvlal of the conditional use permit circumvents zoning and
building codes of the City of Renton, and is expanding a
conditional use which is not permissible by law. Motion to
concur in the Majority Report of the Planning and Development
Committee was restated. ROLL CALL: 2 AYES: REED, MATHEWS.
5 NAYS: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, STREDICKE. -MOTION
FAILED'. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL FIND
THE HEARING EXAMINER WAS IN ERROR AND THE CONDITIONAL USE BE
GRANTED AS REQUESTED. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Michael Smith, 1234 •S. 3rd, requested discussion of Planning
and Development Committee report regarding Bennett-Multi -Vest
Rezone. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, SUSPEND THE
RULES AND ADVANCE TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
UNDER OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED.
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented
Development a report reviewing prior action of the Council on appeal of the
Committee Bennetlt-Multi-Vest Rezone in which restrictive covenants were
Bennett-Multi-requiried imposing certain setbacks and screening as a condition
Test Rezone of applroval . Water District 90, owner of Parcel C in the interior
RmR2 +L824, of
the subject site and not affected by the conditions of the
1-8 ) covenants, refuses at this time to sign the document in spite of
the fact that a binding property exchange agreement exists between
the district and the applicant; however, the transaction is not
anticipated to be consummated for some time. The Committee still
feels the rezone is warranted, particularly since the new Safeway
store on the corner of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street is
developed on the subject site, which has been designated for
shopping center development.
Report continued Therefore, the Committee recommends that the Council permit the
developer to file restrictive covenants without the signature
of Water District 90, and approve the rezone ordinance. However,
Council should go on record requiring the developer to insure
inclusion of Parcel C in covenants concerning traffic circulation
once that parcel becomes part of the shopping center. Council
should further require the developer to limit access to Parcel C
from Ilarcels A, B and D, if Parcel C is not ultimately included
in the shopping center complex but acquired by a third party.
I
1
y , N
Y`- d
I
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
May ' 1983 Municipal Building
Mond-y, 8:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
flag and called the meeting of -the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL H. CLYMER, ROBERT J .
COUNCIL MEMB,ERS HUGHES, RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN W. REED,
NANCY L. MATHEWS.
CITY STAFF IN BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney;
ATTE'iIDANCE
MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; RICHARD C. HOUGHTON, Public Works
Director; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; CAPTAIN
DON PERSSON, Police Department; MICHAEL MULCAHY, Finance Director.
PRESS Jan Hinman, Renton Record-Chronicle.
MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES
OF APRIL 25, 1983 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
PROCLAMATIONS A proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared the week of May 22-28,
National Public 1983, as National Public Works .Week, to recognize and honor the
Works Week qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works
departments responsible for efficient operation of public works
systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets and highways,
public buildings and snow removal .
Municipal A proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared the week of May- 8-14,
Clerks Week 1983, as Municipal Clerks Week, in recognition of the outstanding
and vital services performed by Municipal Clerks.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Robert Anderson, 111 Williams Avenue S. , requested discussion of
Planning and Development Committee report regarding Renton Family
Practice Center Appeal . MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY REED,
SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
REPORT UNDER OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED.
Planning & Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented a
DevOopment majority and minority report regarding this matter. The majority
Committee report, signed by Councilmen Reed and Stredicke, stated that the
Ren't;on Family because the Building and Zoning Department had provided erroneous
Practice Center information to the Hearing Examiner concerning the status of,
App al Williams Avenue S. as an arterial 'road, the Examiner had
CU- D11-83 incorrectly found and concluded that direct access to an arterial
Majority Report street was not available from the subject site. Therefore, the
Examiner had not proceeded with his review of the 11 criteria
listed in Section 4-748 necessary to approve a conditional use
permit. The majority report recommended reversal of the Hearing .
Examiner due to this error in fact, and remand of the application
back to the Hearing Examiner for consideration of the factors
listed in Section 4-748.
Min rity Report The minority report, signed by Chairman Rockhill , recommended
the Hearing Examiner be reversed and the permit be granted
outright, since information contained in the staff recommendation
and the Hearing Examiner reports indicate the 11 criteria in
Section 4-748 have been adequately discussed and show an
overwhelming preponderance of evidence to justify this permit.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
MAJORITY REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE.*
Con inued An addition to the Minority Report was provided by Councilman
Rockhill to reflect an error in fact in the Examiner's report
in the statement the subject site does not have appropriate .
access to an arterial street. In support of his report, he
cited Section 4-3016(G) of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance,
which gives authority to Council on appeal to enter its own
decision. He also noted a minor seven-inch shortage in the
required 20-foot front yard setback of the site, which he felt
should not be a violation. Councilman Stredicke discussed the
Renton City Council
May 2, 19 '3
Page Thre
Planning and Councilman Stredicke requested his name be stricken from the
Development committee report since he felt the Committee had not voted on
Committee a course of action, but rather to request discussion and
Bennett-Multi- recommendation on the matter on the Council floor. City Attorney
Vest Rezone Warren drew the site's configuration on the blackboard, and
continued explained the committee recommendation to include Parcel C in
traffic circulation patterns once acquired by the developer, but
limit
traffic
to Parcel C from Parcels A, B and D if not obtained
by the developer, but by a third party who may not include the
parcellin the shopping center complex. Discussion was held
regarding impacts resulting from withdrawal from the rezone by
one of the participants. City Attorney Warren discussed.
available alternatives including filing a new rezone application
or following the procedure proposed by the committee. Councilman
Stredicke discussed potential problems if the proposal is ,
approved caused by close proximity of Parcel C to the new Safeway
structure. Also discussed were proposed left turn lanes,
modified circulation patterns, and need for rezone to business/
commercial classification by the owner of Parcel C if shopping
center use desired at a later date unless covenants are signed
and the property exchanged to the developer.
Continued Mr. Smith indicated the requirements contained in covenants,
sight- bscuring fence along the northern and eastern property
lines and unified frontage required along the main building,
would not be impacted ibydeletion of Parcel C from the covenant
requirement. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL
ADOPT
THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Finance Director Michael Mulcahy requested advancement to
continued the correspondence portion of the agenda to accommodate certain
members of the audience in attendance to discuss bond issues.
MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, SUSPEND THE RULES AND
ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Mr. Mulcahy reporting bid results
Bid Openilg - this date for issuance of $1 .5 million in Water/Sewer Revenue
Water/Sewer Bonds authorized by Council in early April , 1983. Three bids
Revenue B.nds were received from Foster & Marshall/American Express, Inc. ;
Seattle Northwest Securities Corporation; . and Piper, Jaffray
Hopwood; with net interest rates of 8.6956%, 8.7139%, and
8.7157%, respectively. The letter recommended acceptance of
the low bid of 8.69% by Foster & Marshall/American Express to
purchase the:bonds. Mr. Mulcahy reported that following approval
by Council of issuance.of the bonds, an official statement of
bid was prepared and referred to Moody's Investors Services,
which gave the issue an A-1 rating due to low water rates in
Renton compared to other districts in, King County and because of
very good financial coverage shown in the past. Approximately
400,000 in savings will be generated during the life of the bonds
from lower interest rates or approximately $20,000 per year;
12% interest rates initially estimated. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED
BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE FINANCE
DIRECTbR TO ACCEPT THE: LOW BID OF 8.69% NET INTEREST RATE.
CARRIED. It was noted the last General Obligation Bonds were
sold at 12.20% interest rate approximately one year ago.
CONSENT GENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows
the listing:
Revision to Planning Commission proposed adoption of a proposed revision
B-1 Zo,ning to the B-1 , Business Use, Zoning District. Refer to Planning
District and Development Committee for recommendation.
Liberty ark Parks (Department requested approval of final pay estimate in
Swimmiing Pool the amount of $25,061 .72, acceptance of project (Liberty Park
Sanitary Sewer Swimming Pool sanitary sewer) , commencement of 30-day lien
CAG-06-83 periodl for release of retained' percentage to contractor,
Kohl Excavating, in the amount of $1 ,159.19 if no liens or
claims1 are filed. Council concur.
N1
i. . . ,
A.
4
Ren u;.n City Council
May "! , 1983
Pag= Four
CON" NT AGENDA Public Works Director presented supplement to Boeing Lease
Apr. "C" for sublease of tie-down area on Apron "C" to be turned over
Subl`-ase and to city by Boeing for temporary three year revocable period,
Tem•
l.
rary Lease and sublet to Cedar River Hangar Partnership. Refer leases to
Aviation Committee, Council concur in approval of interim
sublease use of portion of Apron "C" for the month of May, 1983.
Con I ruction Public Works Director presented Utility Division April
Sta ' s Report & Construction and Program Status Report and 1983 Comprehensive
Sew. Revisions Plan Sewer 'Revisions. Refer to Utilities Committee for review.
Ani ' 1 Control Police Chief requested-review of staffing level for animal
Sta ' ing control services. Refer to Public Safety Committee.
Tho `Ias Property City Clerk requested ordinance for annexation of Thomas
Ann; ation Property, 52.28 acres lying contiguous to southeast boundary
of city limits and across the river from Maplewood Addition;
Boundary Review Board Report received 4/19/83 citing no
request for review and no jurisdiction invoked. Refer to
Ways and Means Committee.
KalI Court, Summons and Complaint filed by Richard Kalk v Jane Vanderlinden
Cas and City of Renton in Superior Court for injuries alleged in
pedestrian .accident 12/20/82 on Park Avenue N. Refer to City
Attorney and Insurance Carrier.
Cot0e Court Court case and claim filed by Nancy Jean Cottle v Kimberly
Cash+ & Claim Hatch and City of Renton in Superior Court for injuries
alleged in accident 2/9/83 on 76th Ave. NE. Refer to City
I Attorney and, Insurance Carrier.
I MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, ITEM 6.d. BE REMOVED FROM
CONSENT AGENDA FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED.
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT CONSENT
AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED.
Ite1 6.d. Municipal, Arts Commission presented 1% for Art Procedural
Rem• ed. from Guidelines for Council review and approval . Councilman Reed
Con•'ent Agenda: requested the matter be referred to Community Services
1% I.r Art Committee for discussion instead of Ways and Means Committee
Procedural as listed. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, THIS MATTER
Gui •elines BE REFERRED TO COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE.
Upon inquiry, Administrative Assistant Parness indicated that
the procedure is acceptable to all parties and the matter could
have been referred to either committee. Councilman Reed assured
Council there is no intent to eliminate .1% for Arts funding.
ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: TRIMM, HUGHES, REED, MATHEWS. 3 NAYS:
CLYMER, ROCKHILL, STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke clarified intent of consent agenda item
Sub ease of regarding sublease of Apron "C" to approve only the interim
Apron "C" at agreement for the month of May, with permanent leases referred
Rentn Airport to Aviation Committee.
Community Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented areportSereicesrecommendingacceptanceofthelowbidof $359,688.79 plus tax
Comittee in the amount of $29, 134.79 for a total of $388,823.58 by
Citfl Shops Kohl Excavating, Inc. for the Municipal Shops Project scheduled
Pro ect to commence on May 25, 1983. The report also recommended
authorization for the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract.
MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO. SIGN THE CONTRACT. CARRIED. r
Hum.'n Rights CommunityServices Committee Chairman Reed presented a status
andiAffairs report regarding proposed changes to the ordinance governing
Co fission the Human Rights and Affairs Commission. The Commission feels
Ordinance that a cooperative agreement could be pursued between the city
and state Human Rights Commissions in matters of enforcement
1 action and subpoena powers; and the City Attorney was directed
to contact the state commission to determine necessary changes
I
j'
b, 4
Ce-1^-1C_
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
1 MAY 2 , 1983
BENNETT MULTI-VEST REZONE ;
Sometime
ego, Bennett Multi-Vest appealed the Hearing Examiner's decision concerning
its rezone. The Council amended the Hearing Examiner's decision modifying the setback
and screening requirements and requested the City Attorney' s office to revise the
Restrictive Covenants that existed on the property. The Council later required that
Covenants concerning the setbacks and screening be reduced to writing signed by the
applicant and filed before the rezone ordinance would be passed.
It has1su sequently been determined that the owner of Parcel C, which is in the
interior of the project and is not affected by the required Covenants, will not
sign the Covenants. This' parcel of property is owned by Water District No. 90.
The Council has been informed that there is a binding property exchange agreement
between the developer and Water District No. 90 but that the transaction =wi•ll not
be consurrmated for some tjime. The Committee still feels that this rezone is
warranted, particularly as the first portion of the shopping center, the Safeway
property, is in the midst of development. This is one of the two areas on the
East Hill of Renton that have been designated for shopping center development.
Therefor , the Committee ;recommends that the Council permit the developer to file
the Restrictive Covenants without the signature of Water District No. 90 and, once
those 'ReSitrictive Covenants have been filed, to pass the rezone ordinance. However,
the Council should go on record requiring the developer of the center to insure
that Parcel C is included in the Covenants dealing with traffic circulation , once
Parcel C becomes part of the shopping center. The Council should further require
the developer to limit access to Parcel C from Parcels A, B and D, should Parcel C
not be obtained by the shopping center developer but be acquired by a third party
who does not include Parcel C in the shopping center complex.
1
1
Randy; Ro' kh i 1 1 , Chairman
John Reed
Richard Stredicke
1
r \
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
MAY 2, 1983
BENNETT MULTI-VEST REZONE
1
Sometime ago, Bennett Multi-Vest appealed the Hearing Examiner's decision concerning
its rezone. The Council amended the Hearing Examiner's decision modifying the setback
and screening requirements and requested the City Attorney' s office to revise the
Restrictlive Covenants that existed on the property. The Council later required that
Covenants concerning the' setbacks and screening be reduced to writing signed by the
applicant and filed before the rezone ordinance would be passed.
It has subsequently been determined that the owner of Parcel C, which is in the
interior of the project and is not affected by the required Covenants, will not
sign ;the Covenants. This parcel of property is owned by Water District No. 90.
The Council has been informed that there is a binding property exchange agreement
between the developer and Water District No. 90 but that the transaction will not
be consummated for some time. The Committee still feels that this rezone is
warranted, particularly as the first portion of the shopping center, the Safeway
propert , is in the midst of development. This is one of the two areas on the
East Hill of Renton that have been designated for shopping center development.
Therefole, the Committee recommends that the Council permit the developer to file
the Restrictive Covenant's without the signature of Water District No. 90 and, once
those Restrictive Covenants have been filed, to pass the rezone ordinance. However,
the Council should go onl record requiring the developer of the center to insure
that Parcel C is included in the Covenants dealing with traffic circulation., once
Parcel C becomes part of the shopping center, The Council should further require
the developer to limit access to Parcel C from Parcels A, B and D, should Parcel C
not be Obtained by the shopping center developer but be acquired by a third party
who does not include Parcel C in the shopping center complex.
G-10 '
Randy khill , Chairman
1
1
j-/,--H w
John Reed
7)
Richard Stredicke
2.
je"
y„ c .z.,L-ie_ &. Q2--2'?-n--, "---e ur.s ` _/
f 1
o
OF ike
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON
a 0
V 4$ E G
POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678
np LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
9.
00 Qom. DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
9gTF0 SEP
O' MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
April 27 , 1983 ZANETTA L.FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
TO: Planning and Development Committee
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Restrictive Covenants for Bennett-Multivest Property
Gentlemen:
Some time ago you had an appeal before you from Bennett-
Multivest. You modified the Hearing Examiner' s conditions ,
partly at my suggestion, to include a site-obscuring fence
on the northern boundary of the properties and a ten foot
landscape barrier on the east side of the property. The
restrictive covenants requiring these items were then drawn
and submitted to the property owners . You will find attached
he eto a letter from Mike Smith on behalf of Bennett-Multivest
an a letter from George Fiori , attorney for Water District
No . 90 , one of the property owners . Water District No . 90
re uses to sign the restrictive covenants .
Th' s leaves us with an unusual problem. Apparently Bennett-
Mu tivest requested the City of Renton to rezone property, ,
and at least one parcel of the property is not in their
o ership . Apparently they have no claim against the property
ex ept they intend to bid on the property after the property
is declared surplus by the Water District . Bennett-Multivest
now
requests that we delete parcel C, the Water District
Parcel , from the required restrictive covenants , take the
restrictive covenants file them and then pass the necessary
rezone ordinance.
am not sure that the Council Committee wishes to do this ,
nor that the Committee feels like it was fully advised when
this appeal was before it. I thought it best to bring this
en ire topic back to the Committee for direction.
Lawrence . Warren
L :nd
cc Roger Blaylock
Dave Clemens
Fred Kaufman
Mayor
PACIFIC LAND RESEARCH
1140 140th Ave. N.E. • Bellevue,Washington 98005
206) 454-4421 (206) 226-2099
fie"i. e,...,
E.2E0wE 1.,4:;;It.
v.ow
4r. :irk0_,,,,,.,,,,
At.lr.
o.,,.:,. . ...,,,,,,... ,,
1 ,, :..„... :,,;.:.-,,,.,. ,-,.,....:-.., D 4
PR 221983
April 21 , 1983 W _N&K{ELLOG 1',;:R,
Mr. Larry Warren.
C i ty Attorney
CITY OF RENTON
City Hall a
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
for Union Square Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Warren: 0
Fur uant to the city council 's recommendation we have drafted a
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants that have been reviewed by
your office and by the Renton Planning Department and have been
approved as to form and content. We have proceeded withobtainingthesignaturesofallpropertyownersinvolvedintherezonethat
are identified on the attached map showing parcels A through G.
All the signatures have been obtained with the exception of Parcel
C, which is owned by Water District 90.
We have received a legal opinion from Water. District 90's attorney,
Geo'ge Fiori , Jr. , which is attached, indicating their inability from
a lagal standpoint to obligate the Water District's property to re-
str-ctive covenants. However, they have indicated to us that they
are in the process of surplusing a portion of the property behind
the existing pump station. Therefore, it is relevant. for their
property be included in the total rezone. As you can see from the
attached map the property is not constrained nor effected by the
10 toot landscape strip and the site obscuring fence. To expedite
this process, the owners are requesting that Parcel C be eliminated
from the restrictive covenants.
1
As ou can see by touring the property that Safeway is rapidly underway
and anticipates to be open by mid-July. Rax Restaurant has applied
for a building permit to construct a building on a parcel in front
jLand Use Planning& Feasability • Government Interface • Development
i. ,,•„ ,. „., . ,,-.•.....•,..,..: ... :•••„::••••:,!;i:,,,I.:::::..,,-.7::..i.,;•1).:,,,!'!.•••!..;..v..' .'!", ;••.;i:':•71,'!,:liii•.f.:••TA'iliklt.N':'',:rgil:4!•;:•,...4.:::,1•::::::...'•-••...y, - .• - ..,-i •• •••.'' :•:-.';',:P•••',;•:.'•.r,!:..'..f.:':;...•:,.'''•••••::,:i.••••',..- . ' '..•'!.."--,,';‘, ',.',"::-.•.,••'..',...'.‘•:,•.;-••••••••:•;.
E4.;;;-;-.,'!--'711::•.';'•':!:;,-.,',:..:•'•••-).-•:`,•:-',17.,;:-:,..,,...ie,;...i.:;Mal!!,..t.,,..'.7:..,:c.•:,,•:1.11',...,,.
s; ;..'• ..
1.',';':.-:;'-' .." •-••",:.-. : • . •-•.•,'.•:' -• ' •. -/:'." —.. '•'',•••••••:..'
s '•'...' - •'••••.. --- , ••••::'•',,
7.-••:,...:;'...'',.;',..,•!,:,-..„:"....'...';-":.,„::••.',.;— .:.::•.:',••••:
r".7'.:^,?.-•'•'',
7,.7'.'''.:::,.:••,,‘.•''.t.'-''' ''.:•,. ..ric,,•;:;':,•.-:•.. .....- • .,../....•• •';',
L,,,I.Kv.....:,....,, .f..,.1...1v.r''.".•: - ..,,•'
i.,;.',\•--• . -••
7 .. . '..... ., .:!;.,....;,...-''..!:•.i.,:
2:.....:;V:.!'‹..:•".:•. ....,..,, . .
i*..L.
r. '....;,.-,•••--,.:,.
t.i:.,:
v•.,::,,.,,•..•.'„:,„','•.':,•'''',
7'•';',:'„•;,.',....':.::.,.'..... ' • _.i:'-'-'...'2::..,.-.-::'•• ' : • .:. '''..........':.'• •••
i'.''''''.''..',''•.''''. .:'.:';:-.:.,‘...,'.•.',
r,:'.',:'..''',.,..
5,•,..‘
1';'!:'•.;:;:"',.:'r.-,..:::'4,''f.ti.:',:, .:...;i:.*.•!,'''.:.'....17..-'3'...''.':7," :i-. .•
l'. • ,':..,,...:., ".
1.'''.
e:,.• :.......;'-',:1'.•::.•'.•••........- i.:.•',''.,••''.',F.!''''''''.";:'1';'.' .!.'. • ..'".•- :'.'.'-`'''.1'...:;,..
r".'..--..•,'. . ',`•.'":‘;......i''..',...- ..•.i..:77:•::':'''1,..;'..;•,•;• ..)•'.1,.'1!......:.'i...( 1<d. V.:!:,-,!.,...".-K:',.
P.:•:.':-.•..--;'.''...
1
i,'...:',",..?•rt-'41••••..:, .:'.‘, • '',-'.',•-•
1,f.i'..,..". .,•l'.'•' ,'.'•'„"i ;•-•'-,-..•'.'..••••••'."'"• . . :... ..".
1...i•..:!...:::...*,'.:"'.•'.:'.1..-::',,.....,'.-..
s...:;
i'f',..",.;',;',.,,'.;-..',-,'.1%ei',...,,,,„.;':j.:Z:..1'.4idis.-j..4-
1,4);',;,'
t',?:,..
r.
44:±j'itt-i.;,::;::::::,, ,:•••,':.:-.!'-,:.:1;,.?.:.,:•.-..i.:.]:.,..,--.-..-•in.1,
r.,:,..:-..--....• ,..i 4--
1:11.,_'' ',,,',4itt,i4;q::•1)a g e two :;'.",:;:'..Sr-..,'.'.,..,',,':•:•'..,..:':
0' '..;:.:•.*:.:.'.' .: . •'..:t...':-,:!'',.'.','_'..'.2;-,i,,',-'.1',1,:',•14-','.7.7;'..',...'-;:.;•''r:1,. 11-.1'.:N:::.•:„.4:13:.:0.".,„•: •.‘ -..:4 ''..-1....:;::4:•,;,':•:,-;:
it•:-.1Ax.,:•:-.:>•.•,:.' .:••
L;i„;.;••::,:',.,'•,--,,,!„,,,..r., -,....-;..,.. , .,, ..........„,,.„• ..:
4..;.-::...,-...•••••;:•;:.:
0•,::-/
c.:.--::-:- ,....,'.
4'.--,•••i.,••-.,,..,•••••••;•:.•
1._,,•,,,,7•:•••:,:::-f,„••••,:,,,,,,,F,;.•,•••:•,...,,-.1.--;14:1, ,,,q. :,p,••,.. ,,:. '..-17.,T.,),..V'.',...„).(....,,r.lr..,.;._.0!,,,....
Xii‘..r..V April! -41' *.‘I Ni5 a 7: •.;:j••••, . ,..
1.•,..::'-:.:'.•• 2". •• --;--,•!-.:1:•1-•-•:::sr.; ....ti•,;•.,..'.:j:;::•;.
ii,:,;•.:,•,:•.-.741..N.1,-,.;...1,. ..,
i'4,.,•140.1.047,:t.,!:
tz.
o' tf.,.'7.,:•;,s..:(..J.,\*...•,.•...4*;::.‘..:5.7,719A..,„,',;:•,...
A.,,,.. , .. . ..2-- • •. '. *•_:.,.
1-1...*-,`.''.':.1';,;".••. ,,:'.....';',.;Y:,.,.',‘..
1-.''.':,...:.
i,.;....'."?•:),..":...
4.47.:."1:.`1;:',.1%.C.,.i*.i.',....-:‘,‘.'..7..',..'...‘A..T1?k3.1V-•1,:fi.“
V`i:..• '');,
1j141,:j''.4.11.V.<;:•.111,ti'.•;n:.:.'1)•,:,-1.:... ii.
F....;.i...:.',.,-,.. T•':',1't;'•,7:•,,a•t""n ..,"•
Mrs.-,e:q...l..,.....i/:;‘,........
7...--,Y..,...:...1.:.••,,,,.....„,p).tP,,,,,,,..;•. •Larry •Warren. ,••••,-..,..,......,.,,,..:.,...,....
i..,....-....:••,,.•.-:...-•,.,....,....:..-.
t....•,?..,,..„--„,....;:,...,,,,,......,,,„7,..,.:,.,i....-:...
r...,,;;;.:
2:.......,„,:l.,.....,t,y.•,,•:•,,,•,. ..,•:,.,.. .,,,:
l.i!ftir.,-,.. .,,,%,.. ,,,,...0.,..k,v.,.,..,...,,,,,, ,,,:„.,1.,.;,,,..;,,...:..........,:,
1:•••:.;,•,,,,.::7. ...: "
i.i.''''.',..:-.":F!`,".:7.',f.z.•?!:so...:...f..:,::.1,.:...:••.'., • • .• :--;...''.
2..:1:•.',.•'.,....S.':'. •,;:.':•;...-‘, „.;•••• ,7.:,''..,;,,-;•':!....
i:::-.-.. ',.,..•':-.;:,'.•:,•i .,L,•;.';',•-
i",.:, .;;,';'•.,'iyzli't-ft',
1'.!:,.:..:',?,,'‘
O•1..'•''''.:: i.'-'-';'
Z•-';'!:%'•-
1.",
411.4/-14:e1:".},N4AR7Irr;.'1:;,":;;;Iiii,.:,,..!;..;": ...,..-.....:•1•%:.:....„,-,,......-.•.......-%;::
11 -,Li.:',4; ••'...i.,•1`4i,••• '4".:1•`'''.:i' ''',.,;.
r.4.`••`•"";':'''''''..":','
4:
41vt:-.:.,i;.....':'.7.1,,..:'.. ,a.s .',',1,. t.':•P .'.•-•:'•. :, :-, • '- -...-•:::!.:.-.-1-' ::
1 '.',%:A-.:'::;-'1:'`'-:"..;.'.'i;.V,••::,.;;.f.:.,',';...:;.::,-,,!',1:-I':,si;',.7.1.,b.....,t,l.r.,•••,i.;
r--!••,,...•,'„,-...,-•J.,...f,',•7/:ifi..;•;;I:410,. • ,
cr-,.
ted-, ,-,e„.:.;,-.,....:
1,:.,-;-0,-:,,...,--•.
t",-..4.3.'et4;•,::','i,....;',,i,..•....,:....,p",;„74,•..11,•,:1,1-:',..y...:',.,:.. .:. #4,t3);M:*,(..A,...11.4r.,., , •,-,;- ,,, '4.#0,1sLii.:-,•••-.1. .-.
1.,.;:••'• '',•-,...• '.,.•
i-,'.?
s•:,..,:...,,;),,,4:I,'"••::LS.:••
J•••,,,,,;•••• --- •••;••:•..•.-•..'".•: '.••••••
t-,J.,..;•••1,,,•••'••••••:•-,,.,:::',:'
R :,'.::••4,1'`..0.-
t.T....;i=',
1....;,,...
c..,•;,s,;•,6,;V:::i.,,t1,-.4.:i.lir;',.:1,'•e 4.,-,4...".•,..i-:::,\.',.-,•'..•:',.:',
3)'..;41,1-, P.';
v21.- .%/.,!'prk. • .14Ns4i,tPv't,...*.!--
5.'-....••••••.'•..,'''':'::.1:,.f,- 1.-:q7.,..,•;'::'••- • . '.•: •:..,.:-..:'::-.:•,.:. ..•-•
i..,A.,:i..-.:?,./ 'i:'.'..:.'••••.;',:-;•':.,..!;'•':".,,fi.,';',.es:i.;.$1r,'; ',.`".•I'cii`.64.5),,;:',ef....,,...,....'•;',.:;,i•i:••••,,..;!:.-•,..;:',,Avt11.::1:;.t;,vta 14,74iP;0,..„'4V
A kl'.‘2..-•:-.-4,..•
i... .. • .....-:•.'.:',...-.... ,
l• '. ". .• . .:: , . - ....-.. •-:•.;,`.....':,-.„1::::• ,...........,:'.•.4:;',.:::'!:i)f.V...;!-2.1;i1::e..'4.;3.::49:1(:)rtc,kr4:"...,!. .'',.." :.:'Ls.,':'....!..-;.4.5:
1:54.:V.4•111c41):fil.25.....nt i;..1.0-il•...'..-.- ••
1
il...:2:..,...;..::•.,...,•::.....,,,..._,•,::... ,,,,.‘,.i.„...14i,..,....tkpiii,....,...,..1„:.. ..).:.. ...i.,,,,,.;,:•rz.r.......,...•.•,,, . .,,•1:.,..•„:•.,.,;:.....,„.(:).,.....:
Iv.„,;; .4.;,...,„•v., ..„•,..,.... ...
c.,,..,.. .• : , .. .,..
i,..,. ..,,,.... •:•• ,.... ...: . . ., . ..,.....:,...,:j... ....
1..,..........:.........,......„,..:.. . •........„..:.
7..........,,,...,(...,.‘.•Al...,,,c.,.,,...,„„!..:,: ,,,.,ir:.....,.,.;.,...... ,...,., ..:,.::...,...,........,,,„./....,„„...,...:......,..;..,,,:,y.„..,....,,,.......,:„.t.:,,,..4.,,„.,,,...„,..,:t.?„7...,,,,
4,,
I,..
1,1„,„„.),,,,,..,!...,,,,....,,,,..,....:..:.i,,,,,..;.1..;,...:•'.",,,...... ,:•_:„..... . .,-,,
r '..-..:-:..!•...r.”.:,..;::,..i,....gv.-::1::14'.P.ksr.',”-4',.: A-114‘;.':7,:j: '•--
1-1--: ....-- ''' ..:... : .1.'";:',.... ''' .' ' ;....,.....i.F:1:';4,
r-4;....:-:..',f;•-.'•" ';:,t--:''--......4.',.)'`.. ..,. ,/..:,
i,; / ,4 ,•i%•,,,*;•::,?...,: •.. •
of the Safeway site The.owners:.:lare'r.iegoti.ating. with a number of other
users
t,'••,..:,......
user's •that will* be occupying the. remaining••developable .area'..in..the -.---...•-:....-•••.•; :',.:.•.:r.r.-',;,••
shopping center development.' Your cooperation will be appreciated. • •, : .. ..,. .. „ • •, .
Sincerely
PACIFIC LAND RESEARC • ••••'...'. •,i......'....... 1..,:„.,•••••.,- ......,,..........:•, •?•••••::-.••i.••••..i. ..-...., .....:.,„.,..•
V
2,,,,3,,.-i.1••••i::.,..•-•'0.'....,'•••":,.!•''...-. -•••••••.••, •••-• .
1-•..•••••:.•-•••:••• „- .
i-;,:••.' :•'•,:r•-•.--.-,..•••••,-.,.•••••••:,. ....,:.•;......,....,,.
y.,...,.,...„:..,.,...:......:7........!,1...,::'..:•'. '• :/'.
5'7.'''•.,?:.',',..< •..
1 '''••••••':':
1;11!.•'-"•.
1:
1;'•',..., ', .•..:•„:.....' '
0,',,-.'•.!,-,;••,;',,,"":;;;,::',A.:,.',Z1q(c..•c::.k.',4,-...,',.,:,r,I.,',•,;....i:'• -...:•:....,!..-,' .,.....-.-.!;:'..-...-_,,-•.
4'..
1 f tt,'''r....,;.•!':',,.f.:
ri..:::::/-/,':',--'1', ., .,
i, i'::,;','.1.,-;:',:•,,,*'„",',;.-„!,,%-..
40.:1 ;',,.t....'*,,Z.,•'!!',..,i.';;'..,,,,,.:yr)"4.:.::,1,.....,,?.•.,:.i•-•'::1 •,...,•,...,,,.• i..
1,•
f i!,:,",.. ..':',"'L ;•:.:','-.1.r.,.;%,,,...,, ,:,...4•
3.%
i,.
0,),:
i.:.:15 ,..,,:•.:.;.,1,...-1;*".:..r.'E.C.IZ i,';',. .r,::',Fi0.7;:it'.,e,,*._..'..
4.,:,,::::',..‘fri.'...;,i!.;'!':..,••,,...'.',..'.,.... •'''.:':';'...'1.'.4..:‘4•5'..:.'.'' •. •:
1•...•••••':••..7.,•,''.'.7,%'.'' •''.: ....':.....•I.Yi:::•:VP::.-,`'...: ''' .•-....-''')•
1 .f4';-'''''..i'••M1 C h a el L;: Smith . ,..„. .., ,, ..
r•;*;..':'''... '•''',.'.:-,.;..•.-"•-•.,-'; .:" :-''';),'•""
ii.,.•,, '., .. }•,. •• '-
c:A•: :::',;',.'•*g%-/M rs',r4.•':.,,-.*:..-.:;:'',',....:..,'
r..,•,,'......,. .'•.,. ,',...
F :-. • •.: ' :.:`' '''' '.•'iV.t;'-r.if.'3 4.
4.6..:......",,,:•:v:i'••••,;'-‘'..'ri. ••••••• •••,•,."' •:,•
i.‘,,'.••:,'.',
7.:.:,- .:, . .•::•:-• !1:•:::,••••'•'.!i,f,:;•*••
I • ' : •.::.,•:-,•,,P,,'• .f..,.••••::1:•'::.::-11,:::—••:!.::::;,:',-.-,•;•:::•••;%.c,,:..1:r:,•?,:•:::•',.1,:',-..,.• :';':,:,--
F,:,:::,,::.',.:.:.::‘....:,..*/
r,?/,,',,,:....•••:.•:
j;':•::;1*;••:;..;?::?::-.1.:2.:••:e....,:;;,.. .?t"••••••:.. '
2. '..-•••,. •:..• : •, .:•:-.
1::- ' :. .••....';':. %?..:-"-...'•'. ..
Pres I dent ."-,--,--3,,:.:..!,,...:.h... ,:,••• .,.... .; •,... ..-...
j.:..,- -••••..•...H. .•!-.-.., ....:.• .:.:•••••......,...„...•:.-...:,....-•,••,...:;......,...,. .„,.,..,,,,::-....-:;•....Y. ...;.;..••••• ....... . .• -• - ,. •
1
1 • •
Ip I
oc.
rn so f SITE OBSCURING FENCE - (
E3
Z9•
32a, of
10 FOOTLANDSCAPE0.
IXk,X AX
E BUFFER
f. I•O.•
75' "- `
u
4 Y', •.
W i. NCI:f
i E \.<,..
r
i I
t
33
L.reki
4 .
H )i.:...., . ..• • .
I
6_5'
2.2"•I..
3-4.
111Qfil
l•
I
G \
t
C4Dz . .... . . :, :, ..- h
i 'IN F .4 LI:. .. ..
1' • 44
Aof-r _
A,.a: :a'r , S T 1 fa
r-
f /f EivT'oiY C •iMiTs.o io 2308
1`f29 6 fN7Li1/ '.,A:0 a.iy.,
r/. /`%'on,/i_s%/ '.!
No
t.•.;. No G S, /ir c o/ cfip
Tom--
L'_ -
d
LAW OFFICES OF
HARPOLD& FIORI
OEO GE FIORI.JR. Reply to: 3204 AUBURN WAY NORTH
DAVID L.HARPOLD AUBURN.WASHINGTON 98002
TELEPHONE 1206)833-5001 838-0510
JOHN R.RIZZARDI
KENNETH W.FORNABAI
924-0124
April 6, 1983 1
Mr o obert W. Butt l
Multivest Ltd.
206 Southwest 43rdStreet
Renton, Washington 98055
e : Shopping center Site
Northeast '4th Street and Union Avenue N.E.
Renton, Washington
Dear Mr. Butt:
I return herewith the City of Renton' s Declaration of
Restrictive Covenant which •= presented, together with your
l.ette to the Commissioners at the regular meeting held
April 5 , 1983. The Commissioners and I , and perhaps even
the State Auditor, ',express great concern and disagree with
the 4cessity of King County Water District No. 90 'executing
a restrictive covenant on their land that will expose them
to ;thle risk provided in the last paragraph of said restrictive r
covenant.
1 •
Also, the District has no control , nor does it desire"
control , over your '1"future expansion of a primary shopping
center structure eastward" and. the set; back lines that may
or maY not be compaltibl.e with a unified shopping center
development approac,h. You and the city of Renton may very
we:Lll. ?ecome involved in an argument over this very general
and ambiguous language and the District suddenly find itself
a party to the law s;ui t; or in the alternative some adjoining
property owner may attempt to enforce this language and
again we would be party to a lawsuit and could incur
substantial legal expenses. The landscape buffer of
ten feet as written! in the restrictive covenant could
very well be interpreted to apply to the Water District
since we are a party to it and our property is legally
described therein. We have no intention of having a ten
foot tuffer along our east property line ; nor do we desire
to construct "a site obscuring fence" along our northerly
I
I
i l
I
Mr. . Robert W. Butt
Apri 6, 1983
Page 2
I
prop rty line together with a ten foot set back.
I understand and appreciate that in allprobabilitytheCityofRentondoesnotexpectand/or intend torequiretheDistricttocomplywith .the covenants; but myresponseisthenwhymakeusapartytosame.
2 did not call and 'discuss this with you in thattheDistrict' s position is clear and absolute - it doesnotintendtobeplacedinapositionofcontingentliability.
Sincerely,
HARPOLD & FIORI
George F •ori , Jr
GFJ/mml
cc:. !
ing County Water District No. 90
I
I
a-
C•
OF I? ?
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON
0
C) 4$
L
1- Z POST OFFICE EO><626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON, wA5+INGTON 98057 255-e678
ea
I'
LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
DAVID M. DEAN. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
ARBER, ASSISTANT CITYATTORNEYAOA,
Tet SEPt April 1 , 1983
O
Q MARK E.
ZAN TTAB FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
li-
Michael L. Smith, President
Pacific Land Research.
1140 140th Avenue NLE.
Bellevue, WA 98005
Re : Bennett-Multivest Rezone, R-024-82
Dear Mike :
I have reviewed the draft of restrictive covenants and find
that they meet the requirements established by the City Council .
Therefore, they are approved as to legal form.
I am f rwarding a copy of the proposed legal covenants to
Roger Blaylock. with. the City so that he can also review them.
You sh.uld contact Roger and determine whether or not he has
any ob 'ections .
Very truly yours ,
Lawrence J . Warren
LJW:nd
cc : Roger Blaylock
M=yor
D D a '
ICN OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT'S
W1 EAS, ';Delbert C.
Bennett and his wife Bette Bennett,
Corporation~Odyssey Develoi - t Corporation, Multivest LTD, and ringCountyWaterDistrictNo. 90 are the owners of thefollowingrealcityofRenton, County of King, State of Washington, bedpro as f
in the
described as follows:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL A:
The West " of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section 10, Township23North, Range East, W.M. ;
EXCEPT the N 5629 feet thereof;
AND
EN2EPTt7ie West 305 feet of the South 65 feet of the North 694 feet thereof;
AND t. Southerly 629 feet of the Westerly 396.4 feet thereof;
portion thereof described as follows:
Beginning fat
a 'point 30 feet North of the Southeast borner of said West35oftheSouthwest4oftheSouthwest ; of said Section 10; thence West250feet;
thence North 436 feet;
thence East 250 feet;
thence South
436 feet to the point of beginning;AND EXCEPTIthe most
Southerlyi 42 feet thereof for S.E. 128th St. ascoveyedtoKingCoinbydeedsrecordedunderRecordingNos. 5741040andANDEXCEPthemostWesterly40feetthereofforUnionAvenueN.EE.
5741044;
PARCEL B: 1 .
That portion
f the West 15 of the Southwest 4 of the Southwest 4 ofSection10, TbunShip 3 North, Range 5 East, W.M. described as follows:
Beginning 42 eet North and 75 feet West of the Southeast corner 1of saidWest1;
thence West 1 5 Feet;
thence North 24 feet;
thence East; 1/5 feet;
thence South 424 feet to the point of beginning;
PARCEL C:
The East 75feet or the following:
Beginning 42 feet North of the Southeast corner Of the West 1 of theSouthwestoftheSouthest ; of Section 10, Township 23 North,in King Cotrity IIf Washington;
Range 5 East, W.M.
thence West 25(? feet;
thence North 424 feet;
thence East l2 feet;
thence South 4 4 feet to the point of beginning;
PARCEL D:
The West 175: feet of the South 622 feet of the East, half of theSouthwestquarteroftieSouthwestquarterofSection10,
East W.M. , in g County, Washington;
dip 23 North, Range 5
EXCEPT the Sou
42 feet thereoof conveyed to King County for road bydeedrecordedunderR6cordingNo. 5790505.
1
Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington
PARCEL E:
The South Of
West ;5of the East 1 of the Southwest quarter of theSouthwestquarterofeion10, Township 23 North, Range 5, East W.M. , in King County,Washin 9 except the South 622 feet of the West 175 feet, and excepttheSouth470feetthereof.
1
I
Together with an casanent T ingress and egress 15 feet the width across,ovut andupOn the West 1 the Southeast
quarter of the SouthwestquarteroftheSouthwestquarterofsaidSection10,
the centerline of which isdescribedasfollows: Beginning at the Southwest corner or said Section 10; thenceSouth88902'43" East 821.38 feet; thence North O' 17'32" West 4.2 fee to thepointofbeginnin ; thence North 0'17'32"
West 580 feet to the terminus of said line;
except that portion thereof included in the hereinabove described main tract.
PARCEL, F
The South 250 feet of the West half of the East half of the SouthwestquarteroftheSauteestquarter, S ction 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.in King C ty, Washington;
EXCEPT tie est 175 feet;
EST the South 42 feet conveyed to King County under King CountyRecordingNo. 5738286.
PARCEL G:
The North 110 feet of the South 360 feet of the West half of the EasthalfoftheSouthwestquarteroftheSouthwestquarterofSection10, Township23North,! Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT theWest175feetthereof, TOGETHER With an easement for ingress and egress of15feetinwidthover,
across and upon the following described real estateinKingCounty, Washington:
Over the South 220 feet of the West half oftheEasthalfoftheSouthwestquarteroftheSouthwestquarterofSection10,Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , in King County, Washington, thecenterlineatwhichisdefinedasfollows: Commencing at the Southwest corner ofsaidSection10; thence South 88' 02'43" East 821.38 feet; thence North O'17'32"West 30 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 0417'32" West 220 feet.
PARCEL H:
The South147
feet of the South 1 of the West J5 of the East 1 of theSouthwestquarteroftheSouthwestquarterofSection10, Township 23 North, Range5East, W.M.
1, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 175 feet thereofandEXCEPTtheSouth360feetthereofandEXCEPTtheEast98feetoftheNorth60feetthereof.
Together with an easement 15 feet in width for roadway and utlities across,
aver and upor# the West 35 of the Southeast quarter of the southwestquarteroftheSouthwestquarterofsaidSection10, the centerline of which isdescribedasfollowsl:
Beginning at Southwest corner of said Section 10; thence South 88'02'43" East 821. 8 feet; thence North 0'17'32" West 42 feet to the pointofbeginning;,' thence North 0'17'32" West 580 feet to the terminus of said line;C3EX PT that rtion thereof included in hereinabove described main tract.Tax lot 333, in section 10, ibwnship 23 North, Range 5 East W.M.)
Building Setbacks for Primary Shopping Center Structure
Future expans
n of a primary shopping center structure eastward from the
Safeway store shall provide a setback line that is compatible with a unified
fShoppingice.•
tn r development approach, while providingng architectural and design
Landscape Buffer
A minimum ten '(10) foot wide
scape buffer together with a site dbsctlringfenceshallbeprovidedalongtheNorthpropertyline, and a minimum ten (10)
foot wide 1anclscz pe buffer shall be provided along the East property line.Such buffers 1 be installed as
development consistentwithpartofsitetheextent ',
I
site development phasing. If additional property to theEastisincorporaintheShappn-g center concept the Easterly buffer maybemovedEasconsistentwithsuchpotentialfutureexpansion.
DURATION
These
1,
is shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If
at any tine improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion
of the colVehants pertainingto the s improvements asrequiredspecificinstalled
by the Or'
i es• of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity
of furtherd ntation. AnyamendmentsiI or modifications of this agreement
shall be vapid only if mutually agreed upon by the City of Renton and the
Owners (iicludin heirs, successors, and assignsg to the owners) in writing
and recorded with the King county'Department of Records and Elections.
Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated
by either
the City ot Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property
who are ad
sely affected by any violation or breach ot these restrictive
covenants,
sonable attorney's fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding
will be bo
by the parties wham the court determines are in error and shall
be entered as a ujfigment in such action.
Delbert C. Bennett
James L. Magstadt, President
Landon Development Corp.
Bette Bennett
Charles Owen, President
Odyssey Development Corp.
1
Robert Butt, tivest LTD.
King County Water District No. 90
State of Wa
County of
IICLIV
I
On this i day of, 19 , before me personallyappearedI
Delbert C. Bennett and Bette Bennett, the persons who executed the within and -
foregoing instrument, and ackinstrumentledged said instrument to be the free and
voluntary act and deed of said persons for the nos and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WIGS
IF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical seal
the day and year for the above written.
I
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing in
I
On this day
Yappeared19 , before me pc, mall
the
Corporate
representative of Landon Development Corp., the person who executed
the within and foregoingeg'o g instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be
the free and voluntary act and deed ot said person for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned.,
IN
WrINESS ITEOF,
I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical seal
the day and year for the above written. -
Notary Public in-and for the State
of Washington, residing in
On this day of, 19 , before me personally appeared the
cozporate representative of Odyssey Development Corp., the person who executed
the within foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be
the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned.
IN WIGS
I have hereunto set my hand and affixed•my offical seal
the day and;; y.. for the above written.
N
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing in
On this 1 day ot, 19 before me personally appeared
the Corporate4epresentative of Multivest Development Corp., the person who
executed th 'thin and foregoing instrument, and acknowleged said instrument
to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person tor the uses and
purposes there mentioned.
IN WITNESS
I have hereunto set 'my hand and affixed my offical seal
the day and y.. 'for the above written.
J
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing in
Qn• this of,19 before me personally
appeared the corporate representative of King County Water District No. 90,
the per'son,who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged
said instrument to be the tree and voluntary act and deed of said person for
the uses and purpoges therein mentioned.
IN WTIWESS WHE EOF,
I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical qral the
the day and -. for the above written.
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing in
I
I
1
I
1
OF Re
THE CITY OF RENTON
1 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR I LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9,
0
co•
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
94r
P
E0 SEP re.01/9-ert
February 9', 1 83
Members of Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
Dear Council Members:
May I suggest that the reclassification of both the Bennett-Multivest property and the
G.M. property( has possibly created the need to review the Comprehensive Plan for the
Northea t_Quadrant. The Comprehensive Plan still leaves open two additional intersection
quadrants for potential community shopping centers. If that is not your intended policy,
then re-
revie7
may be appropriate.
The multiple shopping center provision already has led to a complicated review of the
above pro'peries and an unfortunately combative attitude among those parties.
Clarification of the Comprehensive Plan in this area would avoid such complexities in the
future.
If this office can be of further assistance in this matter, do not hesitate to calL
Sincerely,
Fred J. Ka mean
Land Use Hearing Examiner
FJK:wr
0018E
cc: Mayor
City Clerk
Policy Development
0
I
V
R
e, o
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR,
cam
0
co- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500
O,
fl
p D,SEPle°
January 21 , 1983
Mr. Michael L. Smith
Pacific- Land. Research
11 0 1.40th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98005
RE File No. R-024-82; Bennett-Multivest Rezone Request.
Dear Mr. Smith:
A letter was transmitted to you on October 1 , 1982 notifying you
of the action of the City Council in modifying the recommendation
of the Hearing Examiner in the referenced matter. As a condition
of approval , the Council required execution of restrictive
covenants assuring :that a consistent building setback line exists
which would tend to make future development that of a shopping
center (see attached Planning and Development Committee report) .
Un=il receipt of required restrictive covenants, the rezone file
will be held and approval of appropriate legislation delayed.
Your early attention to this matter is appreciated.
Vel-
y truly yours,
CITY OF RENTON
Maxine E. Motor
CiFy Clerk
MEM:mp
Enc.
I
I 12
1
0
Renton City Council
October 1;8, 1982
Page 2
AUDIENCE CO MENT continued
Dr. Mack Richey, 17930 Talbot Road South, requested the matter
Proposed ;I
LID near of the proposed Local Improvement District on South 43rd Street
Valley be brought before Council . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY
General MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE ITEM OF
Hospital THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. Committee of the
Committee of Whole Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the staff
The Whole proceed with formation of preliminary LID boundaries and guide-
lines for the area near Valley General Hospital . The Committee
further recommended this matter be referred to the Ways and Means
Committeelfor proper resolution. Dr. Richey reported he is a
partner in a plastic surgery clinic at the northeast cornerofTalbotRoadandSouth43rdStreetwhichwouldbeseverelyimpacted
by the proposed widening of South 43rd Street, bringing road noise
and vibration within feet of an area of the clinic where surgery
is performed. Dr. Richey requested Council consideration of his
objections. Councilman Stredicke noted that Council action would
only authorize formation of the LID; that proposals within the LID
were not definite and there would be opportunity for discussion.
Mayor Shinpoch stated the matter would be forwarded to thePublicWorksDepartmentanddiscussedatthestaffmeetingof10/19/82.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED.
CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the
items included.
FederallSh red Administration requested Public Hearing be set for 10/25/82 to
Revenue, Pu lic consider the City's proposed use of Federal Revenue Sharing Money
Hearing
for 1983. Information.
1
Police Mutual Police Department submitted an Inter-Departmental Mutual Aid
Aid Agree ent Agreement for police services in potential civil disturbances or
riots between Auburn, Des Moines, Kent, Normandy Park, Tukwila,
the Port of Seattle and Renton. Refer to Public Safety Committee.
J. Amon R,.-zone Land Use Hearing Examiner submitted report and recommendation of
R-047-82
approval with restrictive covenants for Jerry Amon request for
rezone of the north side of NE Fourth Street approximately 200
1 feet west of Duvall Avenue NE from G-1 to B-1 to permit construction
of a one-story building to house a hair styling salon and rental
jspace. 1Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
Christoph-rson , City Clerk submitted application by R. L. Christopherson for vacation
StreetVa ation of a portion of Hardie Avenue NW south of NW Fifth Street. Refer to
V-06-82 Board of Public Works for appraisal and retention of easements and
to the Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting Public Hearing
for 11/22/82.
Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT
Approved AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
OLD BU;SI ESS Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill. presented a
report recommending the City Council require restrictive covenants
Planning and to be recorded in form satisfactory to the City Attorney prior to
Development final approval of the rezone for Bennett-Multivest (#R-24-82) .
Committee Rezonelwas requested for the north side of NE Fourth Street approxi-
Bennett-#ultivest mately 950 feet east of Union Avenue NE from G-1 and R-3 to B-1 _for
Rezone Appeal
development of a proposed community shopping center. Appeal filed
R-24-b2 8/05/82. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
it
w 411)0
I
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
I
COMMITTEE REPORT
OCTOBER 18, 1982
BENNETT-iMULTIVEST REZONE APPEAL R-24-82 (Referred 10/11/82)
The Plar1ning and Development Committee has considered the letter of the
City ;Attorney relating to the requirement for recording of Restrictive
Covenants by the Hearing Examiner in reference to the above appeal .
I
The Committee finds andlrecommends that the City Council require that
such Restrictive Covenants be recorded in form satisfactory to the City
Attorney prior to final approval of the rezone.
I i
it/
Rand;yI Ri k i l l , Chai an
j/%°— ‘-.1/-
1/1---4.1 --
John; Reed eztAiksziArAti/
44."-.. ee
it" 0144
7,4.:131-1.4.,...2
4,, , et' MIA('
04444)
Rober ughes
if el'4,
4„,(
4:
444-
4.
6' .
0 4.0_____
itif
II
Renton City Council
October 11 , 1982
Page 6
Finance MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, AMEND THE RECOMMENDATION
Department TO CHANGE THE IMPOSITION DATE FROM 1/01/83 TO 11/01/82. CARRIED.
Reorganization Original motion as amended: Council concur in the recommendation
continued of the Ways and Means Committee with a reorganization date of
11/01/8 . ROLL CALL: 3 AYES: CLYMER, STREDICKE, MATHEWS; 4 NOS:
HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED, TRIMM. Motion failed. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECONDED BY MATHEWS, SUBJECT OF THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATI(
BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
Voucher Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers 42005
Approval through 42268 in the amount of $1 ,994,316.49 having received
departmental certification that merchandise and/or services have
been received or rendered. Vouchers 42000-42004 machine voided.
MOVED 0 STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPROVAL
OF THE VOUCHERS. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Rockhill inquired if all Council Members had received
J nn ttacopyofaletterfromCityAttorneyWarrenregardingtheBennett-
Multivest Multivest Rezone (R-024-82) Appeal . MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED
RezonelAp eal BY HUGHES, CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING BENNETT-
Correspondence MULTIVEST BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE.
CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch announced that Talbot Road will be blocked between
REPORT 15th aniJ 19th Streets through 11/01/82 beginning 10/11/82 for the
Street state to install curbs, gutters and sidewalks. A detour will be
Closure posted io Shattuck.
Court Cas Mayor Shinpoch announced that a court suit brought against the
Dismissal city by a former city police officer had been dismissed.
LID Bond Mayor Shinpoch reported that Finance Director Mulcahy had pro-
Information vided a response to questions regarding LID bonds and that infor-
mation would be distributed to Council Members.
North End Mayor Shinpoch reported the North End Bus Base was defeated at
Bus Base Metro Coouncil on 10/07/82 by a vote of 13-20.
Executive MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL GO INTO EXECUTIVE
Session SESSION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION OF THE POLICE GUILD CONTRACT
CARRIED. 10:05 P.M.
ADJOURNMENT Council Members reconvened in regular session. Roll was called;
10:40 P.M. all Council Members were present. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY
STREDICKE, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.
MAXINE E. MOTOR, Acting City Clerk
40) 41)
Re ion City Council
Oc ober 11 , 1982
Pa i- 5
OL BUSINESS continued
Tr sportation MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
Co ittee RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. Councilman
co 'tinued Stredicke spoke against the recommendation urging further study
for east-west corridors, additional access onto SR 167 and pro-
viding sufficient access from Talbot Hill to freeways without
entering Renton. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL,
REED, MATHEWS, TRIMM; 1 NO: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED.
ORONANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Was and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances
Committee for first reading:
J. Clifford Gray An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain
Rezone property located on the north side of SW 12th Street between
R- 51-82 Maple Avenue SW and Lind Avenue SW from Residence District (R-1 )
to Light Industry District (L-1 ) , J. Clifford Gray Rezone, File
R-051-82. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THIS ORDINANCE
BE REFERRED BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
Repeal of An ordinance was read repealing Ordinance 3383 regarding non-
Orliinance #3383 payment to FICA for illness or disability wages. MOVED BY STREDICKE
SECONDED BY HUGHES, THIS MATTER BE REFERRED BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR
ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following resolutions
for reading and adoption:
R;solution #2477 A resolution was read authorizing the Finance Director to borrow
LID 320 22,825.01 from the Waterworks Utility Fund for interim financing
I terim for LID 320. Interest rate to be established at the prevailing
F nancing rate at time of borrowing; to be repaid in full , with interest,
upon receipt of funds from sale of LID 320 bonds. MOVED BY STREDICI
SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CART
R ,,solution #2478 A resolution was read authorizingthe Mayor and CityClerktoiY
Interlocal execute an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement with Water District
Cooperative 14 for extension of Renton' s water service into a portion of the
Agreement - district normally served by Water District 14. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
WLLter SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED.
D; strict 14 CARRIED.
P anning Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke submitted a report
Commission recommending concurrence in the Mayor's reappointment of Virginia
R lappointment Houser to the Planning Commission for a three-year term effective
to June 30, 1985. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE REAPPOINTMENT OF VIRGINIA HOUSER TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION. CARRIED.
finance Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke submitted a report
hhepartment recommending approval of the proposed Finance Department reorgani -
i'e organization zation which will result in a savings of $48,000 between the 1982
budget and proposed 1983 budget. Committee further recommended
the request for reclassification of three positions be approved
effective 1/01/83. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, Council
concur in the recommendation of the Ways and Means Committee.
Finance Director Mulcahyoutlined the proposed savings, notingPP
salary dollars as the main source. Following discussion regarding
possible savings by year-end, a SUBSTITUTE MOTION was MOVED BY
CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE WAYS AND MEANS
COMMITTEE REPORT AS IS BUT SUBSTITUTE THE DATE OF 11/01/82.
Councilman Rockhill questioned the need for immediate imposition
of the reorganization. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: CLYMER, STREDICKE,
REED, MATHEWS; 3 NOS: HUGHES, ROCKHILL, TRIMM. MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL RECONSIDER THE
PREVIOUS MOTION. CARRIED.
I
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
I COMMITTEE REPORT
OCTOBER 18, 1982
BENNETT-MULTIVEST REZONE APPEAL R-24-82 (Referred 10/11/82)
The Planning and Development Committee has considered the letter of the
City Attorney relating to the requirement for recording of Restrictive
Covenants by the Hearing Examiner in reference to the above appeal .
The Committee finds and recommends that the City Council require that
such: Rel.trictive Covenants be recorded in form satisfactory to the City
Attorne, prior to final approval of the rezone.
Randy Rockhill , Chairman
John Reed
Robert Hughes
I
I
111M
LqYgTF:Eli/i .I
Ana.
vc
N. : .
il OP fp itt.; fr tili ri
fl----,
3-7 f!. 1 vi El
0OPtz ,I f '
1
B U I L
OCT
Z8 ;:C).1\i,
1 ,,,•
INTER-OFFICE ' MEMORANDUM
1
DepT,
TO : Roger Blaylock-Zoning Administrator DATE : 10/8/82 . . .
1
FROM: . Maxine E. MotOr, Acting City Clerk
RE : Ordinances allialliallas
1 •
B nnett7Multiveat Rezone
1
We attach Ordinances which have
been prepared by the City ttorney . Please verify, • 1
content , lega!ls , description and general location of.
the improvements and return to this office for further
processing and prtpentation to the Legislation Committee,
w. ,
Dee
01 -, ,r . .
1, . .
4110
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTONCHANGINGTHEZONINGCLASSIFICATIONOFCERTAINPROPERTIESWITHINTHECITYOFRENTO.NFROMGENERALCLASSIFICATIONDISTRICTG)1 AND—RE SIDEtCE --,DISTRICT R-3)_ TO BUSINESS DISTRICT 1B-1)./(R-024-82J_ Bennett-Multivestetal
WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations)
of 0 dinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of'
the ( ity of Renton", as amended , and the maps andreportsPpis adopted
inc.njunction therewith,
the property hereinbelow described has
he're .ofore been zoned as General Cl assification District EPG)J and
Resi.ence District (R-3_5 • and
WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification
ofljsaid property has been filed with the Building and Zoning
Depar ment on or about BMarch_ 19,_1982A which petition wasdulyIII
refer ed to the Hearing Examiner for 'nvestigation,
study and, 'public
heari g, and a public hearing havi : been held thereon on or about
9 ,.__1982J and said matter h.
ing been duly considered by the
Hear q- Examiner and said zonin•
request havingbeen approved with
coni;diiion
and the matter hav'ng been appealed to the City Council
of
I'
Ith: City o
Renton and said City Council having amended the '
condiuions of the
Baring xaminer' s Decision and said zoning request
being in
conformity w' th the City ' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended,
and' t e City Council h.vi• •,
duly considered all matters relevant
thereto , and all par es hay
g been heard appearing in support
thereof or in opposition thereto , NOW THEREFORE,
THE CIT, COUNCIL OF THE C '.Y OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLO S :
SECT. ON I : The following describe•\
roperty in the City
of Ren on is ereby rezoned to Business Distri ct (.B-1) as hereinbelow
1-
Ir
4110
specified; subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the
Hearin• Examiner dated. July 21 , 1982 , as amended; the Building Director is
hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning
Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit :
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part
j hereof as if fully set forth herein.
Said property being located on the North side
of N. E. 4th Street approximately 950 feet east
of Union Avenue N.E. )
AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants executed by 'Petitioner-Owners on or about
and reco ded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections ,
Receivin No . and which said Covenants are hereby
incorporated and made ;a part hereof as if fully set forth.
SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its
passage , approval andlfive days after its publication .
PASSED BY 'THE CITY COUNCIL this day of October , 1982 .
Maxine Motor , Acting City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of October , 1982 .
1
I
Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor
Approyed as to form: ,
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
J
Date of Publication :
i
11
1
e- vzc/— £
l'
OF , R
4'A
O OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY •• RENTON,WASHINGTON
c) .i z
POST OFFICE BOR 626 100 S 2nd STREET • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678
E,
O I c'Z'
LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT; CITYATTORNEY0
9.
0 I PCO. DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
0I-re
0
i
MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT, CITY ATTORNEY
ltFD SE
October 5, 1982 ZANETTA L.FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
T : Earl Clymer, President
1.
Renton City Council
F OM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Bennett ;- Multivest Property
r)/
D ar Mr . Clymer :
A one of the cionditions to the Bennett-Multivest Rezone,
I;
t ere was a requirement that the present restrictive covenants
o the land provide for a building setback such that any
development°on the property would be such as to give the
appearance of a neighborhood shopping center. Del Bennett
provided me with copies of the private covenants that had
p eviously been adopted and I find those covenants to
b satisfactory to serve the purpose of the City. Not only
a e building setbacks defined, there are also requirements
f r common areas , parking lots , and the type of uses permitted.
I should be remembered that these are private covenants
ja d are not necessarily recorded. It is possible for Safeway
a d, the property owners to waive these covenants without
d ay notice to the citizens or to the City. However, since
t e Council appeared to wish only some additional assurances
t , at the property was going to be developed as a neighborhood
s pping center, I am not sure that we wish to go to the
a ditional time or expense to make sure that the parties
n tify the City' should there be any attempts to modify the
c venants . If the Council feels that that additional step .
1 i necessary, please so indicate so that I can do the
In cessary work.
II , _might be advisable for you to refer this letter to the ,
P anning_and _Development Committee for recommendation to the
City Council as a whole.
Lawrence J Warren
L :nd
c : Council Members
Dave Clemens
Mayor
I
1
i-
1
v
l
OF RA,
o :,:"•- 0 .THE CITY OF RENTON
CJ 0s Z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055
z ern,
4+
1'
t BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500
per
1
co-
09g7D SEP-C&
C3
October 1, 1982
Mr, Michael L. Smith, President
Pacific Land Research'
1140 - 140th Avenue NE
Bellevue, WA 98005
Re: ,Appeal of Bennett-Multivest Rezone R-24-82
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting of September 27, 1982,
concurred in the report of the Planning and Development Committee up-
holding the July 21, 1982 decision of the Hearing Examiner with the
following exceptions:
1. Conclusion 10 is modified by eliminating the two-year restriction
upon the applicant obtaining a valid building permit. There are
no findings of fact that support this requirement and it is there-
Tore unsupported as a conclusion. The Committee recommended that
t is Conclusion be modified to read that the building permit is
t be granted subject to there being a building permit issued for
t e Safeway Company for the adjoining parcel of property and pro-
v'ding that restrictive covenants have been filed showing that
t ere is a consistent building setback line that would tend to
m ke future development that of a shopping center. Such a require- .
m nt would further development of a community shopping center as
d tailed in Finding of Fact No. 9 and No. 12.
2. T e Committee recommended modification of the recommendation for
a 20-foot landscape buffer on the north and east property lines to
require a ten-foot landscape buffer and a sight-obscuring fence on
tie north property line and a ten-foot landscape barrier on the
east property line. The Committee further found no finding of fact
t¢ support a 20-foot requirement, but did find that Finding No. 10
afld No. 11 indicated residential uses to the north for which a
barrier should be provided. The Committee found that the sight-
obscuring fence and ten-foot landscape buffer would accomplish this
purpose while a 20-foot landscape buffer of unspecified landscaping
might not accomplish that purpose. ,
1
Mr.' Michael L. Smi
l October 1, 1982
Pag
If you have any questions or require additional information, please
do noE hesitate to contact this office.
YoArs very truly,
CITY F RENTON
Maine E. Motor
AWn14 City Clerk
MEM:j m
I
I
Renton ,!City Council
September 27, 1982
Page 3 '
OLD BUSINESS continued
Group W Cable MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES
Rate Increase AND ADVANCE TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT WHICH
continued PERTAINS TO CABLE TELEVISION. CARRIED. Community Services
Community Committee Chairman Reed submitted a report recommending the
Services establishment of a policy guide when dealing with television
Committee cable repairs replacement.
MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT.** Councilman Rockhill
questioned whether this would allow utilities to choose over-
head wiring rather than installing the preferred undergrounding.
Policy Development Director Clemens explained that theCommunityServicesCommitteewasprovidingarecommendationtobeconsidered
by the Board of Public Works at the time of a variance request.
Undergrounding MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, AMEND THE COMMITTEE REPORT
Policy . AND SUBSTITUTE THE WORD "MAY" FOR THE WORD "WILL" IN THE LAST
SENTENCE OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT. CARRIED. To read as
follow : "In areas where any other utility, telephone or power,
is underground, then the television cable must be installed under-
ground. If the existing system, telephone or power, is overhead,
then we may allow the television cable to be installed, replaced
or maintained overhead". **MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE AMENDED COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT. CARRIED.
Committee of Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer submitted a report recommen-
the Whole ding the various utility rate options be referred to the Utilities
Utility Rates Committee for review and recommendation with direction that the
Full funding Capital Program" not be given further consideration.
MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE REPOR-
OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
Finance Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer submitted a report lecommen-
Departmen` ding the subject of the reorganization of the Finance Department be
Reorganization referred to the Ways and Means Committee for further study and
recommendation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Valley, General Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer submitted a report
lecommen-
Hospital Traffic ding a Public Meeting be scheduled for the 10/14/82 Committee of
Situation the Whole meeting and that all property owners affected by the
traffic situation near Valley General Hospital be notified. MOVED
BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF
THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED.
Undergrounding Councilman Reed noted that during consideration of cable television•
Ordinances undergounding, it was found that there are a number of ordinance,,
pertaining to undergrounding and requested that the Administration
invest gate the possibility of consolidating these ordinances.
Coulon, Park Councilman Stredicke commended the Park Board and Park Department
Dedication for a job well done in the completion of Gene Coulon Memor'al Beal`
Park.
Government Councilman Stredicke announced that the first in a series of pro-
Speaks" grams entitled "Gove`rnment Speaks" will be aired 9/28/82at 7:30
p.m. on Channel E or\18 on cable featuring the Auburn Mayor, the
assistant to the County Executive, a representative from the Kirk-
land Planning Department and Mr. Stredicke.
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill submitted a
Development report recommending the Council uphold the decision of the Hearing
Committee Examiner regarding the Bennett-Multi Vest Rezone (File #R-024-82)
Bennett-Multi for approval with restrictive covenants of a rezone of the north
Vest Rezone side of NE Fourth Street approximately 950 feet east of Union
Appeal R-024-82
Renton City Council
September 27, 1982
Page 4;
OLD BUSINESS continued
Planning and Avenue NE from G-1 and R-3 to B-1 for development of a proposed
Development community shopping center with modifications. The Committee
Committee recommended Conclusion 10 be modified to eliminate the twolyear
continued restriction upon the applicant obtaining a valid building permit;
1' that the Conclusion be modified to read that the building permit
Bennet-Multi is to be granted subject to there being a building permit issued
Vest Rezoie for the Safeway Company for the adjoining parcel of property and
App; providing that restrictive covenants have been filed showing that
R-024-82 there is a consistent building setback line that would tend to
make future development that of a shopping center. The Committee
also recommended modification of the recommendation for a 20-foot
landscape buffer on the north and east property lines to require
a ten-foot landscape buffer and sight-obscuring fence on thenorthpropertylineandaten-foot landscape barrier on the east property
line. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED. (See motion, page 6)
Public' Safety Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes submitted a report recom-
Committee mending the Fire Department be designated as Hazardous Materials
Hazardous Incident Command Agency for the City of Renton and that the Mayor
Materials and Ciiy Clerk be authorized to file such designation with the
Incident Agency Director of the State Department of Emergency Services. MOVED BY
HUGHES, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Punchboards Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes submitted a report recom-
mending no change to the present ordinance which prohibits the
operation of punchboards in the City of Renton. The report noted
1 no formal requests have been received from local merchants to
operate punchboards.
Lottery Public Safety Committee report announced that the Washington State
Lottery will begin November, 1982.
Fireworks Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes submitted a report recom-
Control mending that the Renton City Council adopt a resolution and so
Legislation notify state legislators of their concern for stricter fireworks
control legislation: The Renton City Council recommends the
State of Washington return to the former safe and sane fireworks
code and/or more restrictive measures which regulate the sale of
fireworks and that the sale of fireworks on Indian reservations
and elsewhere be limited to these types permitted by our state
code. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
I. THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AND REFER THIS
MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Coulon Park Councilman Hughes added his praise to that of other councilmen
regarding Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park noting that speakers
at the dedication had thanked the citizens of the City of Renton
for making this park possible through the bond issue.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances
Committee and summary ordinances for second and final reading:
Ordinance #3659 An ordinance was read amending Section 3-241 of Title III (Depart-
Special Utility ments) and portions of Section 8-717 of Title VIII (Health and "
Connection Sanitation) and portion of Chapter 34 of Title V (Business Regu-
Charges lation s) of Ordinance 1628 relating to imposing fees for special
utility connection charges for water and sewer facilities and
directing payment of funds received into designated funds, and
related matters. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Rent'n City Council
Sept-tuber 27, 1982
Page 3
OLD ;;USINESS continued
Group W Cable MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE RULES
Rate Increase AND ADVANCE TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT WHICH
cont nued PERTAINS TO CABLE TELEVISION. CARRIED. Community Services
Comm nity Committee Chairman Reed submitted a report recommending the
ServoI ces establishment of a policy guide when dealing with television
Committee cable repairs replacement.
I MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT.** Councilman Rockhill
questioned whether this would allow utilities to choose over-
head wiring rather than installing the preferred undergrounding.
Policy Development Director Clemens explained that the Community
Services Committee was providing a recommendation to be considered
by the Board of Public Works at the time of a variance request.
Undergrounding MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, AMEND THE COMMITTEE REPORT
Policy AND SUBSTITUTE THE WORD "MAY" FOR THE WORD "WILL" IN THE LAST
SENTENCE OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT. CARRIED. To read as
follows: "In areas where any other utility, telephone or power,
is underground, then the television cable must be installed under-
I ground. If the existing system, telephone or power, is overhead,
then we may allow the television cable to be installed, replaced
or maintained overhead". **MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE AMENDED COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT. CARRIED.
Co ittee of Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer submitted a report recommen-
th: Whole ding the various utility rate options be referred to the Utilities
Utility Rates Committee for review and recommendation with direction that the
Full Funding Capital Program" not be given further consideration.
MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE REPOR
OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED.
Fiance Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer submitted a report recommen-
Deiiartment ding the subject of the reorganization of the Finance Department be
Reorganization referred to the Ways and Means Committee for further study and
recommendation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Valey General Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer submitted a report recommen-
Ho pital Traffic ding a Public Meeting be scheduled for the 10/14/82 Committee of
Si uation the Whole meeting and that all property owners affected by the
traffic situation near Valley General Hospital be notified. MOVED
BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF
THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED.
U dergrounding Councilman Reed noted that during consideration of cable television
O inances undergrounding, it was found that there are a number of ordinances
pertaining to undergrounding and requested that the Administration
investigate the possibility of consolidating these ordinances.
Coulon Park Councilman Stredicke commended the Park Board and Park Department
Dedication for a job well done in the completion of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach
Park.
overnment Councilman Stredicke announced that the first in a series of pro-
S eaks" grams entitled "Government Speaks" will be aired 9/28/82 at 7:30
p.m. on Channel E or 18 on cable featuring the Auburn Mayor, the
assistant to the County Executive, a representative from the Kirk-
land Planning Department and Mr. Stredicke.
gManning
and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill submitted a
bvelopment report recommending the Council uphold the decision of the Hearirc.
pmmittee Examiner regarding the Bennett-Multi Vest Rezone (File #R-024-82)
ennett-Multi for approval with restrictive covenants of a rezone of the north
lest
Rezone side of NE Fourth Street approximately 950 feet east of Union
ppeal R-024-82
I r.
Renton 'Ci 'y Council
September 27, 1982
Page 6
ORDINANCE' AND RESOLUTIONS continued
Resolutio #2475 A resolution was read designating Bob Bergstrom, Engineering
Metropolitan Supervisor, as representative or Don Monaghan, Office Engineer,
Water Pollution as alternate to serve on the Metropolitan Water Pollution Abate-
Abatement ment Advisory Committee. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL,
Advisory 'eps COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
Voucher Ways
andl
Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers 41810
Approval through 41999 in the amount of $836,770.73 having received
departmental certification that merchandise and/or services
have been received or rendered. Vouchers 41805 through 41809
machine) voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN APPROVAL OF THE VOUCHERS. CARRIED.
NEW BUSIN:SS
Cable Councilman Stredicke announced that the cable office has indicated
Programmi g Randy favelle is scheduled for the next program and should have
the County budget available. If any Council Members are interested
in partlicipating in this program, they should notify Mr. Hurd or
Mr. Stredicke.
Buffer ,St ips, Councilman Stredicke noted various ordinance deficiencies; there-
Sight-obs'uring fore, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THE SUBJECT
Fences ;an'MATTER OF BUFFER STRIPS, SIGHT-OBSCURING FENCES AND LANDSCAPING
Landscapi g BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
LID Bondi g Council President Clymer inquired regarding the responsibility of
the Council in the event of default on LID bonds. Mayor Shinpoch
responded that the Finance Director will be available to give a
comprehensive presentation on various bonding options.
ADMINISTR'TIVE Mayor Shinpoch stated her pride at being a part of the City at
REPORT' the Colon Park Dedication on Saturday; that it is going to be
Coulon ;Pa k the most special park in King County.
ADJOURIVME T MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED.
9:40 P.M.
MAXINE E. MOTOR, Acting City Clerk
Ren Cin City Council
Sep ember 27, 1982
Pag 15
ORD ,NANCES AND RESOLUTIONS continued
Ordnance #3660 An ordinance was read granting unto the Board of Public Works
Revocable the duty of managing and granting Revocable Permits for the
Per its use of public right-of-way. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY
HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE. ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL:
ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3661 An ordinance was read creating a special fund known as "Cumula-
Rea! Estate Tax tive Reserve Fund No. 3661" and providing for the appropriation
Cumjlative and transfer of funds. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL,
Resrve Fund COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
CARRIED.
Ordinance #3662 An ordinance was read amending the telephone utility tax rate,
Telephone reducing from 7.75% to 6% over a five-year period. MOVED BY
Ut'I1ity Tax STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
Fist Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances
for first reading:
Bo[Jd Sale An ordinance was read amending Ordinances Nos. 3394 and 3532
LID's 315, 317 pertaining to Local Improvement District 315; establishing con-
and 321 solidated Local Improvement District 315 et al and consolidated
Local Improvement Fund, District No. 315 et al ; fixing the amount,
form, date, interest rate, maturity and denominations of the
consolidated Local Improvement District No. 315 et al bonds; rati-
fying and confirming the sale and providing for the delivery thereof
to Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation, Seattle, and fixing
the interest rate on Local Improvement District assessment install-
ments in Local Improvement Districts 317 and 321 . MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECONDED BY HUGHES, SUSPEND THE RULES AND MOVE THIS ITEM TO SECOND
AND FINAL READING. CARRIED.
0 dinance #3663 An ordinance was read amending Ordinances Nos. 3394 and 3532
B nd Sale pertaining to Local Improvement District 315; establishing con-
L D's 315, 317 solidated Local Improvement District 315 et al and consolidated
Local Improvement Fund, District No. 315 et al ; fixing the amount,
form, date, interest rate, maturity and denominations of the
consolidated Local Improvement District No. 315 et al bonds;
ratifying and confirming the sale and providing for the delivery
thereof to Seattle-Northwest Securties Corporation, Seattle, and
fixing the interest rate on Local Improvement District assessment
installments in Local Improvement Districts 317 and 321 . MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE
AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: MATHEWS, REED, STREDICKE,
ROCKHILL, HUGHES. 1 NO: CLYMER. CARRIED. (See page 6, item 5)
rirst Reading An ordinance was read amending Section 5-112 and 5-209 of Title
usiness V (Business Regulations) of Ordinance 1628 relating to applica-
icenses -tions and returns. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, THIS
ublic Disclosure MATTER BE REFERRED BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED.
The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following resolutions
for reading and adoption:
esolution '#2474 A resolution was read amending Section I of Resolution 2457 to
street Forward read: The Director of Finance is hereby authorized and directed
hrust Fund to borrow the sum, not to exceed $700,000 from the Street Forward
sorrowing
Thrust Fund, bearing the prevailing rate of interest received by
other City investments at the time of such borrowing and such
sum to be allocated unto the Current Fund, Park Fund and Street
Fund as required. Said loan from the afore-mentioned fund shall
be repaid in any event not later than December 31 , 1982. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION
AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
PLANNING AND DEVELOPEMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT
TO: , R; nton City Council
FROM: Planning and Development Committee September 27 , 1982
RE : B;NNETT - MULTI VEST REZONE
F le R-024-82
The P1-nning and Development Committee met on Thursday, September
23 , 19: 2 to consider the appeal of Bennett-Multi Vest . The Committee
recomm:nds the Council uphold the decision of the Hearing Examiner
with t e following modifications :
1 . Conclusion No . 10 is modified by eliminating the two
year restriction upon the applicant obtaining a valid
building permit . There are no findings of fact that
support this requirement and it is therefore unsupported
as a conclusion. The Committee recommends that that
Conclusion be modified to read that the building permit
is to be granted subject to there being a building'
permit issued for the Safeway Company for the adjoining
parcel of property and providing that restrictive '
covenants have been filed showing that there is a
consistent building setback line that would tend '
to make future development that of a shopping center .
Such a requirement would further development of a '
community shopping center as detailed in Finding of
Fact No . 9 and No . 12 .
2. The Committee recommends that the recommendation of
a 20 foot landscape buffer on the north and east
property lines be modified to require a ten foot
landscape buffer and a sight-obscuring fence on
the north property line and a ten foot landscape '
barrier on the east property line . The Committee
further found no finding of fact to support a 20 i
foot requirement , but did find that Finding No . 10
and No . 11 indicated residential uses to the north'
for which a barrier should be provided. The
Committee finds that the sight-obscuring fence
and ten foot landscape buffer would accomplish this
purpose while a 20 foot landscape buffer of un-
specified landscaping might not accomplish that
purpose.
1
4,,
A •
THE CITY OF RENTON
POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 •
n S' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
cce
45
0eD SEP1c-
0
Q
BARBARA Y.'i SH NPOCH
MAYOR
EMOE,ANDUM
DATE:' September 23, 1982
TO: Planning & Development Committee
FROM:' David R. Clemens, Policy Development Department
SUBJECT: BENNETT-MU TIVEST APPEAL R-024-82
The appli.ant has appealed he conditions of approval of the above referenced rezone.
First, the applicant has appealed the requirement for a. two year duration for the
rezone, unless a shopping center is implemented.
1. The applicant argues that Safeway has received a building permit on aportionofheareaintendedtobeusedfortheproposedshoppingcenteruse. They
arg e that the issuance of this building permit should meet the requirements of
the Examiner's condition. However, if not, the applicant argues that it has met
the timing requirements of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The applicant further argues that the project will take five (5) to seven (7)
yea,s to implement and that in "planning terms" this. duration should be
con..idered short term.
3. The applicant further argues that the public will be better served by not
restricting the development process to the time limits recommended by the
Exa iner.
4. The applicant concludes by arguing that covenants requiring the reversionofzonngwillbedifficulttoadministerandthusshouldnotbeutilized.
The applicant has also appealed the requirement for a landscaping buffer alongthenorthand -ast property lines.
1. The applicant argues that the proposed twenty (20) foot landscape buffer
exc,--ds normal ordinance provisions, which would call for as little as a five (5)
foo' buffer.
2. Fur her, the appellant argues that there ist no precedent for such an
extensivelandscapebufferrequirement.
Planning & Development ^-mmittee
September. 3, 1982
Page Two
3. Fin ly, the applicant argues that a lesser buffer would be sufficient: without
req iring landscape buffer areas which would not be consistent across the north
pro rty line. It should be noted that the portion of the site to be utilized by
Saf way was rezoned in the 1960's and contained no buffer requirement. Thus,
a ore restrictive buffer requirement on the second portion of the shopping
cen ier would not matdh the currently proposed area.
DISCUSSI•N
The Exam' er, in his decision, makes clear the basis of his arguments .in Conclusions
No. 8 thro gh No. 11 as it relates to Condition No. 2. In the Council's adoption of the
Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive Plan, it concluded that one shopping center was
appropriat- along the N.E.j4th corridor during the life of the Comprehensive Plan.
Four ldcatr ons were determined to be potentially acceptable. As a result, the Council
adopted t e following language: "Only one of these corners should be developed as a.
retail shopping center."
In this c-se, the Examiner was faced with two very similar requests within the
parameter- of the locations established in the Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive-Plan.
After deliperations, the Examiner concluded that the "market place" should resolve
these
competing interests. However, to insure the City that it would not be faced
with scatt-red, uncoordinated, or unrelated development,- the Examiner recommends a
time limit for these property owners to "perform" upon their proposals for a retail
shopping 'enter. We believ that the requirement, to obtain a building permit within
two years and commence construction within one additional year should be considered
more than adequate.
With rega ds to Condition No. 1 requiring a twenty (20) foot landscape buffer, we
believe that the City Council's recent adoption of the McWilliams multi-family rezone
north of this site) clearly established a policy on the part of the City Council to
proceed ith additional residential rezones surrounding the shopping center site. As
this po'lic is implemented, the public will not be served unless- these conflicted land
uses are s:parated by appropriate buffering transitions.
The City I ouncil has agreed with setbacks of twenty (20) feet for separations between
commercia and residential areas in a number of cases, the most analogous to this
particular site is the shopping center located at the northeast corner of Union and
Sunset. his site required a twenty (20) foot landscaping setback between the
commercia areas and residential uses to the north and east.
RECOMM;NDATION
Based upo the discussion above, the Policy Development Department believes that the
Examiner's decision is fully within the scope of the policies established by the City
Council i the Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive Plan, and the most recent rezone
activity by the Council
surrounding the subject site. The Examiner's decision shouldbeaffirmed.
Renton City Council
4
August 16, 1982
Page 2
Consent Agenda c•ntinued
Appeal - Appeal has been (filed by Michael Smith, President of Pacific Land Research,
Bennett/ 1140 - 140th Avenue NE, Bellevue, of the Hearing Examiner's Decision of
Multivest 7/21/82 for approval with restrictive covenants of a rezone of the north
Rezone side of NE Fourth Street approximately 950 feet east of Union Avenue NE
R-024-82 from G-1 and R-3 to B-1 for development of a proposed community shopping
center, Bennett/Multivest, et al , Rezone #R-024-82. Refer to Planning
and Development Committee.
Bid Opening City Clerk reported bid opening 8/11/82 for 84th Avenue Co-op Water System;
Water System 11 bids received. Refer to Utilities Committee. (See attached tabulation.)
Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, CONSENT AGENDA BE ADOPTED AS PRE-
Approved SENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE A D CURRENT BUSINESS
Metro Transit/ Letter from Mayor Shinpoch reported the possible consolidation of the
Commuter Pool Metro Transit Program and Commuter Pool Program with Metro assuming the
Program administrative responsibility
for the Commuter Pool Program. The Admin-
Merger istration recommended Council go on record as endorsing this proposal
provided that: (a) Federal Aid Urban System funds be phased out within
three years to be made available to other projects, and (b) a transportation
committee be formed to oversee the commuter pool operation under Metro.
This merger is to be considered by the King Subregional Council at the
Puget Sound Council of Governments on 8/27/82. Mayor Shinpoch is on the
Metro Council acid Councilman Stredicke is on the King Subregional Council
Committee as well as being employed as a consultant for Metro. MOVED BY
HUGHES, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL GO ON RECORD AS SUPPORTING THE ADMIN-
ISTRATION' S RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Lions Park Letter from the Renton Lions Club, Lyle A. Dull , Park Manager, and Hal Kloes,
Shared President, P. 0. Box 554, Renton, requested discussion regarding a possible
Management shared management agreement for Lions Park between the Renton Parks Depart-
Proposal ment and Renton Lions Club. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, THIS
CORRESPONDENCE BE FORWARDED TO THE PARK BOARD. CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS
Utilities Utilities Committee Chairwoman Mathews presented a committee report recom-
Comm— iittee mending the following regarding professional and public liability insurance:
Professional/ 1 . As a requirement before any consultant contract will be let on any
Public public works ploject including architecture, engineering, construction
Liability management or other consulting work not directly covered by the public bid
Insurance laws for which there is already an insurance requirement and bonding require-
ments, the city will require the following levels of insurance: a. Public
Liability - $190,000 per person and $250,000 per occurrence. b. professional
Liability - $250,000 if the contract is less than $100,000 and $1 ,000,000 if
the contract is over $100,000. 2. It shall be city policy not to agree to
any limitation of liability as part of any city consulting contracts, either
public liability or professional liability. Committee report was signed by
Committee Members Mathews and Trimm. It was MOVED BY MATHEWS. SECONDED
BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN UTILITIES COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER MATTER TO
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Aviation Aviation Committee Chairman Trimm presented a committee report recommending
Committee the Mayor and Acting City Clerk be authorized to sign Supplement 4 to Lease
Supplement 4 Agreement LAG 08-79, a sublease of ground under the new Renton Aviation Hangar
to Airport to support the financing arrangements for the newly constructed hangar. The
Lease LAG 08-7• terms of the original Lease LAG 08-79 remain unchanged. MOVED BY TRIMM,
SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AVIATION
COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Renton Cimy Council
August 16 1982
Page 3
Old Busin:;ss continued
Committee of Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer presented a committee report
The Whole recommending the proposed ordinance clarifying the Hearing Examiner
Hearing appeal process be referred to the Ways and Means Committee and that
Examiner ` •peal the Hearing Examiner specifically identify the authority of the Council
Process when all reports are issued. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AND
REFER THIS MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED:
Boards an•,; Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer presented a committee report
Commissio recommending the following for each Board or Commission:
Board of Board of Adjustment: No change; Library Board: No change; Planning
Adjustmen •,; Commission: Membership shall remain at nine. Council will extend an
Library B•'=rd; invitation to Planning Commission to meet with Planning and Development
Planning Committee. Committee of the Whole will meet with the Planning Commission
Commissio annually or semi-annually. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED.
Park Board' Park Board: Concur with the Mayor' s recommendation: 1 . The Mayor will
have appointment authority when a Park Director is selected. 2. Council
confirmation is required when the Director is appointed. 3. The new
ordinance should be reviewed by the Park Board prior to Council consid-
eration. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT REGARDING THE PARK BOARD. CARRIED.
Board of Board of Ethics: Refer to the Administration with direction to draft a
Ethics formal proposal showing how the current ordinance and code should be
revised to reflect needs specified by the Mayor. MOVED BY ROCKHILL,
SECONDED BY HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE
WHOLE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Municipal ; Municipal Arts Commission: An ordinance should be drafted and presented
Arts to the Municipal Arts Commission which would: 1 . Leave 12 members on
Commission , the Commission; no less than six shall reside in the city. 2. Delete
consulting role regarding private property owners. 3. Delete Commission
authority for contract negotiations and arrangements. 4. Transfer respon-
sibility for maintenance and rotation of art to Facilities Supervisor.
Committee of the Whole Chairman Clymer noted that another point had been
discussed but not voted on and asked Council 's direction regarding one
percent for art. Councilman Reed explained the ordinance would be drafted
and presented to the Commission prior to Council consideration. MOVED BY
STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ROCKHILL, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT, AS IS LEAVING THE ONE PERCENT FOR ART
ORDINANCE, AS IS, AND REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. Councilwoman
Mathews spoke against the motion, objecting to use of utility construction
funds for art. MOTION CARRIED.
Fire Civil Fire/Police Civil Service Commission: Concur in recommendation to combine
Service/ the Commissions into a single unit. The Administration should submit a
Police Civi , plan for accomplishing the reduction from six members to five. MOVED BY
Service HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE
Commissions COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. Councilwoman Mathews encouraged the Administration
1 to coordinate the efforts to reduce membership with respective departments
and labor unions and to include the five members in the initial consolidation
of the commissions. Councilwoman Mathews suggested an orientation or pre-
sentation for commission members to better inform them of the problems within
each department. MOTION CARRIED.
1
Human Right Human Rights and Affairs Commission: Refer to the Administration for prepa-
and Affairs ration of an ordinance and further discussion with the Commission. 1 . All
Commission authority for investigative and/or quasi-judicial activities should be deleted
from enabling ordinance. 2. A Commission with seven members will be retained
in an advisory capacity to hold hearings and report on issues referred to the
Commission by the City Council . MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY STREDICKE,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED.
11
1
AGENDAITEMRENTONI
1
For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only
CITY COUNCIL MEETING I
1
SUBMITTING
omm. CityClerk For Agenda Of August 16, 1982'Dept./Div./Bd./g 9
Meeting Date)
Staff Contact Maxine Motor'
Name
iAgenda
Status:
SUBJECT: App al of Hearing Ex!aminer's Consent X
Decision of 7/21/82 - Bennett!Multivest,
Public Hearing
I Correspondence
et al , Rezone 024-82
I
Ordinance/Resolution
I
Old Business
Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps,/ Etc.)Attach
New Business
Study Session
A. Appe•1
Other
I
B. Hea ing Examiner's Decision
C. Cit Clerk's letter /of 8/05/82
Approval :
i Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A_
COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes_ No. / N/A
Other Clearance
Planning a d Development Committee
i
I
I
FISCAL IMP CT:
Expenditur Required $i
Amount
I
Budgeted Transfer Required
SUMMARY (B ckground information, prior action and effect of implementation)
A tach additional pages if necessary. )
A•peal filed 8/05/82 by Michael Smith, President, Pacific Land Research.
I
I
I
I
I
I it
PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED:
1
I
I
SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION.
1III
OF R
A.
4 0
0
OFFICE of the CITY CLERK
IliTzri.5;i-7N200MillAvenueSouth •
Renton,Washington 98055 MI f
1 Auci 6 's 2 i ',-:.::i.:::;; i...: a 7 a 1 ;
11%
94 1 1 3.I \i ,,,,;'•-••:.1 • - : ,tec. sErle°
s•--
i-jA ..-'r;::::::' '
c,i-,f'i:".. .'?-i2'i ,-:.--;'
E c LE f VAIE-IirgAUG12, 1982 10 Mr. Robert Terry
I Up.9
1-bw••*--SE.. 24th
aft max
Bellevue, WA 98008 1/4
7 (
3°
r7-77.7.7.- -... r---r_-:-..--. .) Vs:›,-M
A111, !?1
i
A
5
I
July 21 , 1982
y
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND 'ECOMMENDATIOi TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL.
APPLICANT: Bennett-Multivest, et al FILE NO. R-024-82
LOCATION: I
North side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 950 feet east of
Union Avenue N.E.
SUMMARY OF ,RESUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G-'1 and
R-3 to B-1 for development of a proposed community shopping
center.
SUMMARY OFF Building & Zoning Department: Approval with restrictive
RECOMMENDATIO : covenants.
I
Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive covenants.
BUILDING & ZO ING The Building & Zoning Department staff report was received by
DEPARTMENT 'RE'ORT: the Examiner on June 22, 1982.
PUBLIC HEARINe: After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report,
examining available information on file with the applicaion,
and field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows :
The hearing w.s opened on June 29, 1982 at 11 : 12 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Munici .al Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
Roger Blayloc , Zoning Administrator, presented the Building & Zoning Department report,
and entered t e following exhibits into the record:
Exhilbit #1 : Application File containing Building & Zoning
i
Department report, letter from Triad Associates ,
dated June 14, 1982 regarding half-street
improvements east of the site, and other
pertinent documents
Exhilit #2: King County Assessor's Map
Exhibit #3: Zoning Map in vicinity of subject site
Exhibit #4: Comprehensive Land Use Designations overlaid
on Aerial Map
Exhibit #5: Conceptual Site Plan Map (not binding on city `;:,
or applicant)
The Examiner r-quested testimony by the applicant. Responding was :
Michael Smith
17422 108th Avenue S.E.
1
Renton, WA 98055
I
Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding ownership of the property, Mr. Smith advised
control by 'pen ett-Multivest Partnership with the property to the west, not part of the
rezone, owned y the Safeway Corporation. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding
whether the, applicant would be' willing to stipulate by covenant that the subject site would
be developed as a unified whole, Mr. Smith was uncertain if he had the authority to respond;
however, it is the intent of the applicant to provide a planned shopping center on the
site along the lines of the conceptual site plan.
Mr. Smith revi wed his educational and professional background as an urban planner, and
indicated conc rrence with the staff report as presented. He noted the possibility of
future rezonin of seven additional acres owned by the applicant to the east of the subject
site following establishment of the Safeway facility to the west which could increase the
size of the sh pping center to1, 21 acres in size. Reviewing various documents submitted
with the appli ation, Mr. Smith noted that written reports for the environmental checklist
and the rezone request outlined in detail various requirements for the rezone, environmental
impacts of the proposal , and also include a traffic report. He described the purpose of the
rezone of the ight-acre site to provide for expansion of the six-acre business-zoned
Safeway site t the west allowing creation of a commercial hub. Uses surrounding the
i
I
R-024-82 Page Two
subject 'site were discussed, and it was noted that existing single family homes on the
subject 'site will be removed as phasing occurs. Mr. Smith advised that the only conflicting
land us surrounding the site is a single family residence quite a distance to the north,
and rez 1ne of that property in conformance with the comprehensive plan is intended by the
owner i the near future. He indicated that a small amount of business zoning exists on
other q ladrants of the intersection of Union and N.E. 4th, but none approach a sufficient
propert ' size to develop a viable commercial node, and, consequently, a hodgepodge of strip
develop ent has occurred. Additionally, many of the larger business zoned sites in the
area ha been' developed for multifamily use.
ReviewiI conformance of the proposal to the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Smith referenced
general land use objective No. 1 , which states that land use decisions should be consistent
with ay.ilable community facilities , utilities and transportation in the area, and the
third policy which states that land development should progress logically from west to
east in ,the Renton plateau. He advised that development of the site is shown as a major
commercial node on the comprehensive plan land use map element and is the next logical
step fo growth in the area.
Prior t• review of existing and proposed residential developments in the area to illustrate
the nee for a commercial shopping center, Mr. Smith submitted a petition into the record
which h:d been circulated among the residents of Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park in support
of the .'roposal , which was entered as follows:
ii
11
Exhibit #6: Petition from Leisure Estates (89 signatures)
The following developments were described: Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park on Union south
of the subject site, 250 existing and 200 proposed units; Ventura Partnership condominiums
on the Forth side of N.E. 4th on the west side of Union, 240 units ; U. S. Homes/Terrace
Projection N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue N.E. , 280 units ; ERADCO project on N.E. 3rd
Street, 400 units ; Cascadia (Northward) PUD to the north of the subject site, approximately
700 uni s; Fernwood Subdivision south of the site, 75 homes with a parcel north of that
site wh ch could be developed to a density of 60-80 units ; Vantage Point Condominiums to
the wesi , 96 units ; Clark-Rich Condominiums north of the site, 12 units. These eleven
project: create a total of 2,850 units in the general vicinity of-the subject site.
Reviewil'',g other policies of the Comprehensive Plan , Mr. Smith advised conformance of the
proposa to Policy No. 8 of the Land Use Objective; Policy No. 1 and No. 6 of the
Commercial Development Objective; and Policy No. 1 of the Utilities Objective which requires
availability of sanitary sewers as a prerequisite for new land development. The Examiner
noted t at testimony by a representative of the Public Works Department would be requested
later ii the hearing regarding the capacity of lines in the area. Mr. Smith noted that a
commercial development does not create a high demand upon sanitary sewer facilities
compareb to residential development, and in some instances , septic tank facilities have
successfully served certain Safeway store facilities. Regarding the land use element of the
plan, felt that although an office park designation alone in the area of the subject
site w.''' ld probably not support itself or be economically desirable, a substantial
commer•ial area could be compatible with proposed office use and stimulate that type of
develo•
I,
ient. The market area would extend out in a funnel-shaped pattern from 1-405,
wideni ". as it goes east along N. E. 4th Street, and the subject site is of sufficient size
and re. ired amenities to support that market area.
Responding to the Examiner 's inquiry regarding timing of removal of single family homes
on the rite and access to those homes by an easement from N. E. 4th through portions of
the sud''ect site, Mr. Smith stated that the homes are owned by the applicant and would
remainiin that ownership or rented during the phasing process which is proposed from west
to easIL He noted that phasing could occur within a year or within three to four years .
The acdess could remain or be shifted to the east since control of the seven acres adjoining
that p.grcel remains with the applicant.
The Ex. iner requested testimony by a representative of the Public Works Department to
responu' to the issue of availability of sewer service to serve the subject site. Responding
was :
Bob Bergstrom
Engineering Supervisor
Mr. Bergstrom stated that the project site lies east of Union Avenue N.E. in the Heather
Downs drainage basin which drains south to the Cedar River complex. The existing sanitary
sewer`' a1in Union flows approximately 200 feet south to N.E. 4th Street, then west into the
old Cloy of Renton collection sewer system. The 8-10 ,inch sewer system is presently at
capacity at 7th and Sunset, and property owners do occasionally experience flooding. The
subjec!, site could be served two ways, either by pump system which flows westerly into the
existing sanitary sewer system and provide small improvements downstream where sewage
shifts the King County-City of Renton shop interceptor which then flows out to the
Cedar
jiver
Metro trunk, or by gravity sewers flowing south into the Heather Downs community
south .f N.E. 4th Street. Both of those options will require capital improvements to
i
5 H.
R-024-82 Page Three
accommodate ervice to the site. _ F
Responding for the applicant was:
I
Robert Terry
15804 S.E. 24th
Bellevue, WA 98008
Mr. Terr4 District Manager for Safeway Stores in Bellevue and Renton, reviewed his
background a d experience in selecting proposed sites for the grocery chain. He indicated
that the mar et research development division in Oakland, California had done an extensive
survey ofth= area and had determined that the timing of establishing an additionl store
was econorii ic- lly feasible at this time. The other two Safeway stores in the city have
expansion co straints , and the subject site was determined to be a logical location to
serve the growing market in the northeast quadrant of the city. The property has been
purchased, a d funding for construction and the design concept have both been approved
for the new store scheduled to open in July, 1983. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry
regarding th= impact on the existing Safeway store in the Renton Highlands, Mr. Terry
stated that 'he majority of population growth from the east and southeast wouldjbstify11
an additional store, and the proposal will contain approximately 43,500 square feet and
a variety of departments to accommodate customers who prefer one-stop shopping co venience.
He encourages approval of the requested rezone to allow expansion of the proposed shopping
center in th, future. Mr. Terry confirmed Mr. Smith's testimony regarding operation of
other stories on a septic tank system since the use generates very little sewage, nd
advised the eason the Duvall and N.E. 4th Street site was not selected for the S feway
facility 4'as due to existence of a major intersection which creates traffic and a cess
problems into the site.
The Examiner requested further testimony in support of the application. There wa. no
response. H- then invited testimony in opposition. Responding was :
George A. Kresovich
Hillis , Phillips , Cairncross , Clark & Martin
403 Columbia Street
Seattle, WA 98104
1
Mr. Kresovich, representing G. M. Associates, indicated that testimony would be p ovided
by consultants for his client. The Examiner then affirmed all parties wishing to testify.
Responding was:
William E. Popp
William E. Popp Associates
10615 N.E. 4th Street
Seattle Trust Building, Suite 400
Bellevue, WA 98004
Responding to Mr. Terry 's comments regarding the desirability of a shopping cente at the
intersection of Duvall and N.E. 4th Street , Mr. Popp stated that the site had beep analyzed
for projected conditions in 1, 86 considering substantial growth in traffi.c from tie east
and northil and that intersection has been planned accordingly with left turn chan elization
and pavement widening. In hits opinion, the traffic in that location will operate
efficiently. He noted an error in the traffic report prepared for the subject re one,
which mistak-nly identifies Union Avenue as a four-lane arterial and Duvall Avenu as a twr.
lane roadway when the reverse is true. Also, the report suggests the need for a two-way
left turn la e on N.E. 4th Street, and considering the traffic volume, Mr. Popp f1- lt that
a two-way le t turn lane is a mandatory improvement.
Responding w-s:
Jerry Buck, Director of Planning
Triad Associates
11415 N.E. 128th Street
i
Kirkland, WA 98033
Mr. Buck dlis•ussed his opinion that Duvall Avenue now and in the future is the only street
capable o h-ndling full improvements to accommodate traffic for a shopping cente , noting
that near N. :. 4th Street/ Duvall is a 100-foot wide right-of-way which narrows to 86 feet
to the north. Union Avenue N.E. is a 60-foot wide right-of-way which, because of existing
development, will not be able to be widened in the future. Furthermore, the sever'
now owned by the applicant to the east of the proposed rezone site is in a configuration
where only a portion could serve as an extension of the shopping center, topograp is
constraints .f the property would require substantial filling to allow developmen , and
the site hbuis established single family residential uses. Mr. Buck felt that th existin,
B-1 zoned ;pr.perty lying west of the subject site would be more appropriately dev loped
for office' u es than retail/commercial use given the surrounding residential uses since
office use c-n more easily be made appropriate neighbors than a large scale retail .shoppin
center.
1
1
Ili
II
Il R-024 82 Page Four
Respondling was:
II David Halinen
11 Triad Associates
11415 N.E. 128th
11 Kirkland, WA 98033
Address '
l'
Ing the sanitary sewer capacity, Mr. Halinen objected to Mr. Blaylock's assertion
that if the applicant is served by the sewer main north from Heather Downs Subdivision,
the Ben ett-Multivest development would be served first. The Examiner clarified that Mr.
BlayloclI's testimony will be weighed. Mr. Halinen stated that given problems with
the exiting facility to the west down N.E. 4th Street and that the site under consideration
is in all. ifferent sewage drainage basin, he requested that should approval of the rezone
be gran;-d, the Hearing Examiner require that a sewer system be provided by gravity to the
south. °upport of that proposal is given in the draft EIS for the Northeast Quadrant
Compreh: sive Plan.
II
Mr. Smil' stated his belief that each proposed rezone should stand on its own merits in
accorda Icewith rezone procedures. He indicated that the Safeway facility provides an
anchor in the proposed shopping center which will draw a large number of other developments
in the gllanned center approach, further supporting approval of the rezone. Responding to
comment•° regarding traffic improvements , he noted that plans for channelization and left
turn lall'I along N.E. 4th Street would be reviewed with staff to provide a logical
develop ent of that facility. Additionally, the intersection has recently been upgraded
and is .apable of accommodating the proposal , and there is no need or intention of
widening Union Avenue N.E. in the future. Responding to comments regarding development
constraints of the additional seven-acre site to the east, Mr. Smith indicated that the
site is of under review at the hearing, and the subject site is of sufficient size to
accommo.ate the proposed shopping center and provide for parking, circulation, landscaping
and setacks. Options for provision of sanitary sewer to either the west or south will be
reviewed) with staff as the project proceeds.
Mr. Kreovich objected to testimony regarding provision of an anchor by development of a
Safeway torewhich he felt was neither relevant nor germaine to the land use issue. He
support:d inclusion of the condition regarding gravity sewer to the south if approval of
the reztne is granted because unless it is imposed, the policy of the Northeast Quadrant
Compreh:hsive Plan will not be fulfilled to ensure that sewers should be logically provided
to servzI planned development.
The Exa liner entered the record of the previous public hearing, File No. R-019-82, G. M.
Associa -s rezone, into the record as Exhibit #7. He then requested an additional 14-day
period III which to publish a recommendation regarding the matter. Since there was no
objectilln, the hearing regarding File No. R-024-82 was closed by the Examiner at 12:35 p.m.
II
FINDINGS ° CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS11,
Il
1 . The •-pplicant, Bennett-Multivest, et al , filed a request for a reclassification of
apprll>ximately 8.5 acres from G-1 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot
size)- 35,000 square feet) and R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) to B-1 (Business/
Comm. rcial) .
II
2. The
jpplication
file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building
and toning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the
record as Exhibit #1 .
3. Purs llent to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C, as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has
beeiissued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) ,
resp. nsible official .
Iv
4. Plan: for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impa€lt of this development.
5. The
C:I'
Ilubject site is located on the north side of N.E. 4th Street and east of Union
Avenue N.E. by approximately 950 feet.
6. Tlie '!ubject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 2290 in November of
19661 It was automatically classified G-1 at that time. The westernmost dogleg
was declassified to R-3 by Ordinance No. 2307 in February of 1967. A portion of the
subject site was considered for a reclassification- to R-3 in 1977. That request was
denil'd.
I
R-024-82 Page Five
7. The site i - generally level although it slopes downward toward the northeast.
I
8. The Compre ensive Plan 's map element indicates that the subject site is suitable
for the, de elopment of commercial uses. The commerical policies and objectives of
the Northe-st Comprehensive Plan indicate that only one community shopping center
should be -stablished in the general area. The areas generally designated are the
northwest, northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of N.E. 4th Street
and Union avenue N.E. and the northeast corner of the intersection of N.E. 4th Street
and Duvall Avenue N.E. The subject site is east of the northeast corner of 4th and
Union. !Th. policy indicates that after implementation of a shopping center at one
of these locations , the other location should be reanalyzed for appropriate uses .
The Commercial Development Policy No. 6 reads as follows:
The La d Use Mtn neeogn,izeo that one eommun ty-.cafe netai,e 4hopping cen.en
20+
I
a e. ) .c.is ju/sti.b.ied by the anticipated ma'Fze t bon the akea along N.E. 4th
w,i t'in e cityty Viitls duting the £.i.be o b .the p.ea.n. Subb-Le Lent area 4.4
de6ign, ed at N.E. 4th Stkeet and Union Avenue N.E. to ptov.ide bon community
ohopp.n, baci.e.%tia cut the nofcthwe4-t, nontheaot, and 4outhea4. co/me/us and
ava'Jab'e at the noh theau,t conned. o b N.E. 4th and Duva.i. OnI y one o b .heo e
conneu 4houed be deveeoped ass a netai.e 4hopping cen-en. Upon -tmp.eementatian
ob one hopping comp.eex,
1 the Comptehenzive Plan 3hou ld be eva.eua ed bon
appno p ate uA e o b the nema-.n.ing eonneAo. "
i
9. The appliic.:nt proposes developing a community shopping center in conjunction with
adjacent p operty to the west already appropriately zoned B- 1 . The property to
the west i •, owned by Safeway stores which plans to develop a supermarket on the
site.
I
A gasoline station is located on the immediate northeast corner of N.E. 4th and
Union Aven e N. E.
10. Four singl : family homes are located on the subject site. These homes would be
removed; as the developmentiproceeds from west to east. An easement roadway crosses
the subjec site to provide access to homes on landlocked property to the north of
the site. Owners of these latter parcels have suggested a roadway be constructed
on the eas perimeter of the subject site to these properties.
11 . There are : variety of uses in the vicinity of the subject site. Aside from the
gasoline s- rvice station to the southwest of the site, another service station is
locatedwe.t of the intersection. A convenience store and bank are located south
of the sit- . A twelve-unit condominium is located immediately west of the subject
site' s wes erly dogleg.
Vacant proserty is located east of the subject site and was suggested for possible
easterly e pansion of the proposed shopping center. Single family homes are located
east of that parcel and also north of the site along Union Avenue N.E.
I
12. The applic:nt has not indicated the specific uses which would be incorporated into
the center, but with the Safeway store, the uses would include at least a supermarket ,
and probab y convenience hardware and drug stores. The traffic generation/attraction
of the ,sit- depends on the specific uses , but it is estimated at approximately 8,400
trips per say. The current vehicle trips per day on roadways in the area are
approxi'mat- ly 19,000. I
13. Sewer service is available at Union Avenue N.E. and could be extended to the subject
site but t e line has downstream capacity problems . Capacity is available in the
Heather Do ns trunk to the: south and an extension would also be required to tie into
that lime. The Union Avenue hookup would require a pump station while the Heather
Downs hook p would be gravity fed.
14. There i''s a ailable capacity in the water mains in the vicinity of the subject site.
15. The inters-ction of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. 4th Street is controlled by a traffic
signal . Both streets are city arterials and Union Avenue N.E. has a 60-foot right-of-
way.
16. The applicant proposes developing approximately 139, 117 square feet of leasable area
on the subject site and adliacent westerly site.
17. A proposal to develop a community shopping center for the northeast corner of
N.E. 4th and Duvall AvenueiN.E. (File No. R-019-82, G. M. Associates) has also been
submitted to the city and both public hearings were held the same day. While each
location ust be able to meet the criteria enumerated in Section 4-3014, because
Policy ,6 .f the Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan indicates only one shopping center
R-024-82 Page Six
J
lal'•ng the N.E. 4th corridor, the two proposals were presented as clearly in
c.
lpetition
for approval .
18. T
I
city utilized a market analysis prepared for the G. M. Associates rezone request
to conclude that a community shopping center was appropriate for the area, although
th- specific site was not reviewed (See Finding No. 15 of File No. R-019-82) .
19. Other zoning in the area consists of a relatively large B- 1 district straddling the
4t and Union intersection and running west as far as Monroe Avenue N.E. R-3 zoning
isi locatednorthwest of the site and T (Mobile Home Park) zoning is south on the
we t side of Union.
CONCLU IONS:
1 . Th11, proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest
III
will not impair the public health, safety and welfare. In addition, the rezone
mu it comply with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which
provides in part that:
all. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area rezone or land
use analysis; or
b. 'i The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the
Comprehensive Plan; or
c. i There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area
in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or
area.
As " indicated below, the applicant has demonstrated that the subject site has the
chracteristics necessary for the development of a community shopping center, but
th- re is "still the proviso of the Comprehensive Plan which indicates that only one
community shopping center should be located within the N.E. 4th Street corridor in
th:; vicinity of Union Avenue N.E. and Duvall Avenue N.E. Since two proposals for
ths type of development in that corridor were presented for review simultaneously,
itIwould be appropriate to impose certain conditions so that effective implementation
wi 1 occur and the general welfare enhanced.
2. Th:; subject site, while not located immediately at the intersection of two major
arterials , fronts on N.E. 4th Street and abuts a parcel to the west which fronts on
Unl'on Avenue N.E. The subject site will be developed in conjunction with that
parcel . Joint development of the two sites will permit access to the proposed
shopping center from either N.E. 4th or Union N.E. The subject site is therefore
in a highly desirable location for a community shopping center (Policy 5.D. 1 ) .
3. Whlle the area is currently surrounded by scattered single family uses , these uses ,
esmecially to the north are in transition. While multifamily development is located
im ediately west of the subject site and north of the allied parcel on which Safeway
plflns to develop a supermarket , it provides a buffer (Northeast Comprehensive Plan,
Co'munity Policy 5) and will be able to easily utilize the shopping center. The
proposed use is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan map designation for the site
an' with the designations for the surrounding area which is for office park development
an, multifamily housing.
InNorder to protect neighboring uses and comply with the landscape objectives of the
Co prehensive Plan, a twenty foot landscape buffer should be established along the
noth and east property line. Such a condition should be reviewed if the center
incorporates additional property east of the subject site in which case the buffer
co Id be moved eastward.
4. Th-1
intersection near which the site is located has recently been signalized and
thl intersection can accommodate the traffic which will be generated by the subject
s i e.
5. Whi'ile the ability of the sewer located at Union to handle additional waste is in
do bt without downstream improvements , gravity disposal to the Heather Downs system
is possible with a developer extension.
6. Si ce the subject site is well located at the intersection of two arterials , is
gelerally well buffered or may be buffered from surrounding lesser intensive uses ,
isliprobably large enough when developed in association with the Safeway proposal
im ediately west, and could provide development compatible with the Comprehensive
Plan, the City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site to
B-', subject to the condition indicated below.
j.R-024-82 Page Seven
7. There
was no analysis of
the impact of a north/south roadway on the property' s
easterp boundary and it would be premature at the rezone stage to require suchadedicaItio , especially si ce an easement for such a purpose already exists.
8. The folio ing conclusions have been incorporated into the Examiner's Report for
File N . '-019-82 and thi application, R-024-82 because the language of Policy No. 6
of the No theast Comprehersive Plan.
9. Consideri g the two proposals separately without reference to the Comprehensive
Plan's "o e shopping center" proviso indicates that there is nothing to militate for
one propo•al and against the other. Both sites are capable of sustaining the traffic,
both coulp reasonably sere the same growing service area, both would concentrate
community services in one location, both will need to either improve the existing
capacity of the Union Avenue sewer or extend a line to the Heather Downs trunk,
both irate d to or can be buffered from adjoining uses , and both are compatible
with many of the goals anc policies of the various elements of the Comprehensive
Plan. Bu , taken together, they could conceivably encroach on each other's service
area (('ol cy 5.1).3) , especially during their initial period of operation awaiting
the growt of the service area; they are fairly close together, approximately a
mile agar ; and the "second" center would usurp land which the Comprehensive Pllan
indicates would serve other useful purposes such as office park. Therefore, whileII
the condi ion below will not necessarily assure one viable shopping center, it
attempts ,o require adherence to a reasonable implementation schedule.
10. The Copr:hensive Plan in icates that upon implementation of one shopping center,
the other three designated potential sites be reevaluated for other possible uses ,
possibly :ven another shopping center if the need is apparent.
The key word is "implementation." The Comprehensive Plan does not provide a
methodFof determining which one of two or more locations would be more appropriate
given iha the locations and properties appear to be equally suited forcommunityii
shopping ienter development or at least business/commercial uses . The problem is
compoundep because two similar proposals were submitted for evaluation at the same
time. Ne ther development could be "implemented" without first approving a
reclassif cation to B-1 which is an underlying requirement for commercial development
on either site. Therefore, the Comprehensive Plan provides only limited guidance,
but at le. st establishmen of a shopping center within a reasonable period of time
should be required. That is, either a community shopping center is developed on
one or bo h of the respec ive sites within two years or the zoning on, one or both
sites sho Id revert to its former status. If implementation at either site did not
occur alit in the time limit., the city could reanalyze what use would be in the
l
best
interest of the public for the site or sites. This stipulation, in the nature of
a contrac reclassification of the properties has been recognized by the Washington
courts 'as a valid use of the zoning powers. (State ex rel . Myhre v Spokane, 70W 2d207 ( i
In order o also eliminate some of the potential ambiguities in determining w ether
implement.tion has occurred , the applicant will have to have been issued within the
two ye6r period a valid building permit. If the building permit granted in t e two
year period expires without being utilized as provided in the Renton Building Code,
then tie .oning shall revert to its earlier classification.
11 . RatheOh.:n encourage speculative and potentially premature reclassification if either
site whil : foreclosing the development potential of its competitor, the City Clouncil
should approve the requested reclassification subject to the filing of restrictive
covenants embodying the time frame of implementation. Policy 5.A. 1 requires that
II
commercia zoning only be allowed to the extent of short term needs to avoid
speculati e rezones which do not benefit the public. Reasonably timely implementation
under the condition would help effectuate this policy.
r
RECOMMENDATIO :
4un1i1TheCityshouldapprovetherequestedreclassificationtoB-1 subject to:
1 . Provision of a 20-foot landscape buffer on the north and east property lines.
i1
2. Execution of restrictive covenants implementing the condition enumerated in
Conclusio No. 10.
ORDERED T IS 21st day of July, 1982.
I
7K:2, .1614ft iw.—.....ww.;—
Fred J. Kauf
I
Land Use Hearing Examiner
1
I
R-024-82 Page Eight
I
TRNSMITTED THIS 21st day of July, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties
ofrecord:
Michael Smith, 17422 108th Avenue S .E. , Renton, WA 98055
Robert Terry, 15804 S.E. 24th, Bellevue, WA 98008
11
George A. Kresovich, Hillis , Phil lips , Cair11 ncross , Clark &
Martin, 403 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98104
ll William E. Popp, 10655 N.E. 4th Street, Seattle Trust Bldg. ,
Suite 400, Bellevue, WA 93004
Jerry Buck, Triad Associates , 11415 N.E. 128th Street,
Kirkland, WA 98033
David Halinen , Triad Associates , 11415 N.E. 128th Street,
Kirkland, WA 98033
Henry Balko, P.O. Box 68562, Seattle, WA 98168
Mary and Ed Porter, 29422 18th Avenue S. , Federal Way, WA
I 98003
TR4NSMITTED THIS 21st day of July, 1982 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton , Public Works Director
David Clemens , Policy Development Director
Members , Renton Planning Commission
Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director
II Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
ill
11
Pursualt to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be fi `{ed in writing on or before August 4, 1982. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in
judgmel'it , or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at
the pr1!lor hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) d:ys from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specifc errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the
record take further action as he deems proper.
An appal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such
as,peal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
other •specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or
purcha:'e in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall .
11
II
11
11
II
11
J
1
1
t•' •' ••1
I
1 - if i r.i'-ci-
Ash.• •.7.,
el. ..- 4,1, ;
t Mil rt ttiLyi _..k. (.1. ,))---,
N:n
r
t/i 6"r1 Er'IsmJ7.:'= ix
wE Gv Pl.
N
1C. i
II•Al.
1 .11.-1.L.. .• E , • ••, ,_ i--. • L.,
p
p_N LW T i I el -- — -. -
I -
r
p i1
t R- I
1
L 1
1
i i 1"-- Ib- j [--i_. _. ..,_ 1.1 _., . _ .
i
I 1-. ,ala poop T I
3 1
T iIH i r, , ,. .-- ___I it
il:
f
1 12 I 1, I EXHIBIT. NO. 3
VE
7R NNW OD
r
1 Cr?Eo aXEM NO. .o2 -S.
T
I I wu,rrtn
1
AM
JUN 2 )1982
C /1 E Y RY 4 I ! I
Pr N
w
WI
1el
R 3
II
1`
14.1
L
1 . 1
fT R-, ;
1
o v' 1 i 4,
0 > ..' o THE CITY OF RENTON
V 0 t, % a
r`' o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o i 'rap BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9 Go
0 Q
Au(tus t. 5, 1987_
FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593
1Tg.
EO SEPt
e
1
Members , Re ton City Council
Renton, Was ington
RE: Filo No. R-024-82, Bennett-Multivest , et al Rezone; and File No. R-019-82 ,
d, . Associates Rezone.
1
Dear Council Members :
As you will notice, the last four conclusions and the recommendation in each of the
above entiitled matters are identical . Although the applicant in the G. M. Associates
rezone has of yet executed the restrictive covenants , this office has forwardedto
you that 'file since the two items are closely associated and you may want to review
both items oncurrently. Generally, reports are not forwarded for your review until
covenants h ve been executed, but under the circumstances , confusion may occur as the
Bennett-Mul ivest application has been appealed and discussion of the G. M. Associates
decision ,oc.urs in the Bennett-Multivest report.
1
Regarding t I e appeal , the same conditions were imposed upon both applicants ; however,
G. M. Associates has not appealed the imposition of those conditions .
While Safeway has applied for a building permit, it is not for property involved with
the rezonle equest . Construction on that separate parcel would not effectuate the
condition's imposed, as covenants must run with a particular parcel of property. In
addition, a single supermarket does not constitute a shopping center, and the record
reflects itha fact that Safeway was going to construct the store with or without the
approval M' a rezone for the subject site.
I
If the applicant actually intended to construct a shopping center rather than p1reparing
a specula!ti e venture, the time frame would not be onerous , as one can observe how
quickly act al development plans are implemented once official approval is granted.
If the rezo e is not needed 'for five to seven years, ' approval of same at this point is
premature a d in violation of Policy 5.A. 1 : "Commercial zoning should only be allowed
to the extent of short term needs."
I hope thlis letter will provide assistance' to you in your deliberation of the above
referenced matters .
Sincerely,
V11"44P'La
Fred J . Kaufman
Hearing Examiner-
I
OF i °
4,
00 THECITY OF RENTON
yI z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
rn BARBARA Y..SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500
o,
9A
j
co,
0,
9/
L) 5EP1
Auguvt 6, 1982
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STAT. OF WASHINGTON)
ss. 1
COUN Y OF KING
MAXINE E. IMOTOR, Acting City Clerk of the City of Renton,
beinl first'duly sworn on oath„ deposes and says that she is a citizen
of t e United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over
the .ge of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this .matter.
That on the 6th day of August, 1982, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. ,
your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post.Office in
Renton, King County, 'Washington;, by first class mail , to all parties of
reco d, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S
DECI ION FILED BY MICHAEL L. SMITH, PRESIDENT, PACIFIC LAND RESEARCH, '
FOR HE BENNETT-MULTIVEST, ET AL, REZONE, FILE R 024-82.
i7;ld,,,,cd,of.;:, e.
7 ';
k),CF.40Z.?;E4:_}
Maxi a E. Motor, Acting .City Clerk
1
SUB CRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ,me this 5th day of August, 1982.
It1 J' _,gyp.&/ G ip, C
Not. y Pu61 i c in .and, or the State
Of ' ashington, residing in King County
jkm
1
1
1i
p"-tl — +bcnneel'-nllulfiveet,etal
NEEED COPIES TO: ENT
Y CITY ATTORNEY' S OFFICE 8/0(o
1 RECORD CHRONICLE (PRESS) OX7
V MAYOR' S OFFICE 0(0.
11 _ CITY COUNCIL I{4 'fife' S/O5
kINANCE . DEPARTMENT
HEARING EXAMINER
Y 4;44DEPARTMENT ghy®
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 1X4P
L
1
ENGINEERING 8/(x,
Pell PETITIONER/APPLICANT E3/0(
CCbo,
ti
DOI( DeVel Ken*. 87:DG
STREE DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
i
VIn. iit.c.0noninn;cIr-v) 8/(1 ,
OF •,•
17
y THE CITY OF RENTON
jU00ZMUNICIPALBUILDING200MILLAVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
IA
1 ,
rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500n
09.
0
co,
0,
9gT
D SEP
tA
P
August 5, 1982
APP:AL FILED BY MICHAEL L. SMITH, PRESIDENT, PACIFIC LAND RESEARCH
Re: Appeal and Reconsideration of Hearing Examiner's Decision
Dated July 21, 1982, Bennett-Multivest, et al , Rezone.
File No. R-024-82
To artier of Record:
Pur uant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use
Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk along
with the proper fee of $25.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent
docments will be reviewed by the Council 's Planning and Development
Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter
is reported out of Committee.
Ple se contact the Council Secretary at 235-2586 for date and time of
the committee and council meetings should you desire to attend.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF RENTON
77472-6r--'-'-'f-c er;2P-Lot...,
Maxine E. Motor
Acting City Clerk
MEM:j km
loPACIFIC
LAND RESEARCH•
1140 140th Ave. N.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98005
206) 454-4421 (206) 226-2099
August 4, 19 2
i
Mayor and Ci Council
Renton, Wash' gton
Municipal Bu. ding
Renton, WA 8055
Re: Appeal f Condition142 of Hearing Examiner Recarrndation, File No. R-024-82
Dear City Co cil Members,
Please acce t this letter as our formal request for appeal of the Hearing Examiner
Recommendat n regarding the Bennett-Multivest Rezone, File No. R-024-82. As planning
consultant or the applicant, we submit to you the following explanation and justification
for such appeal.
We do not d'sagree with the total recommendation and, in fact, concur in recommendation
for approva of the rezone. The applicants appeal concerns only Condition #1 & 42 of
the Hearing aminer's Recommendation.
Condition # ,
Condition # states that the applicant shall execute restrictive covenants implementing
the condition enumerated in Conclusion No. 10. Conclusion No. 10 states that
implementation of the shopping center has occurred when the applicant has been issued,
within a two-year period from rezone approval, a valid Building Permit. If the
Building Pe . it granted in the two year period expires without being utilized as
provided in'the Renton Building Code, then the zoning shall revert to its earlier
classificat on.
We feel errors in fact and law exist with respect to this condition which the Examiner
was not aware of at the time.
I'
1. Since e Hearing Examiner issued his decision, Safeway Store, Inc. has applied
for a B ilding Permit on land within the shopping center proposal. This is
on land that had already been zoned B-1 and was not in the rezoned portion.
However Safeway is an integral part of the total shopping center proposal,
and cre?tes the anchor or stimulus for its further development.
Although Safeway testified at the hearing that they had purchsed the property
and were going to build a new store, they hadn't actually applied for a Building
Permit. Because of this new or amended fact we feel that we have complied with .
the implementation requirement by initiating development of the shopping center
with this major tenant. We ask that the council concur in this fact and eliminate i
the nec ssity for Condition #2. 1
Land Use Planning & Feasability • Government Interface • Development
Page Two
2. If the c. cil still feels that we haven't met the"Building Permit requirement,
we ask .t you base elimination of this condition on additional errors of fact
and law:
Error in fact and law: . The timing issue was fully addressed in our written
just''lication and at the hearing. The subject proposal complies with all
of th- "timing" criteria established in Section 4-3014 of the Zoning Code
and e Comprehensive Plan. This includes adequate transportation facilities,
utili ies, substantial growth and development in the area, etc. (See Hearing
Ex. ' er Conclusion #1) . The subject site is the commercial shopping center
that actually designated as such on the Comprehensive Land use Element,
and slies with the policy ofddevelopment in a logical west-to-east pattern.
NowheFe in the comprehensive plan does it state that a two-year reversion
clau should be applied or is reasonable. It is doubtful that given the
ove elming compliance to all the Comprehensive Plan elements and Policies
that [it would be in the general welfare to hinder progress of developing
a c lete center by having to go back through the rezone process in the
midst of its development.
Error in fact: It takes longer than two years to build a shopping center
such s the one proposed even if it was started today. Therefore, the term
reas nable" used by the Examiner in Conclusion 10 is in error. The truth
is t once zoning is assured then plans must be further refined. These
two steps are absolutely necessary to attain even a "first glance" by a potential
user-t. Then there is a tremendous amount of work in attracting and
negotiating with a variety of retail users. This occurs on a progressive
phase basis; in this case generally in a west-to-east pattern. Safeway is
an
the f' st and major user for the subject center. Building activity will,
therefore, occur over time in a progressive manner; not as one large Building
Pe It for the entire shopping center. Therefore, it can be seen that an
actual fact of development by a logical progressive approach would take
approximately 5 - 7 years depending on general economic conditions.
The Examiner does not anywhere is his recommendation, explain how he arrived
at the two-year time period. We know for a fact that at least one center
is assumed over the approximate 10 year span of the Comprehensive Plan.
Erroiin fact: There is no explanation in the Examiner s recommendation
of term "short term need". It is a fact, however, that the need exists
for further planned commercial nodes. The market studies mentioned at the
hearing conducted by Safeway and the G.M. associates representatives, indicate
this fact. In a planning sense, short-term would be considered a 5 - 10
year span; where long-term would be a 10 - 20 year span. Proper planning
must 'ponsider both. Sufficient supply of suitable land must be made available
to at least fulfill those short-term nccds, and permit a comprehensive planning
and marketing strategy for the center.
The evelopment span (5 - 7 years) of a commercial shopping center of the
magn' ude proposed would, therefore, fall within such "short-term" need criteria.
Suitably zoned land cannot be restricted to the point where it strangles
the planning and marketing efforts of a total community shopping center development
effort. This type of approach should be encouraged and not hamstrung with
unre istic conditions.
L
Page Three
Rezoning a portion of the shopping center mid-stream it its development process
would be totaTly unreasonable, counter-productive and not in the public interest.
Error in fact: The public welfare would actually be better served to permit
the.unobstructed zoning and planning for a desireable commercial center which
is very important to the public welfare. These aspects compared to the Examiner's
two y: stipulation are much greater determinents of the public welfare.
Error in law: Although restrictive covenants and reversion clauses have
been tilized in the past and to some detree accepted by the courts, they
are s ill an awkward unnecessary, approach to zoning. They create many
a ' istrative and legal problems for the City and the property owner (i.e.
who interprets them?, who monitors and enforces them?, how and when are they
enfor ed?, who keeps track of the 2-year period?, what if the center has
made substantial development progress?, and many more) .
Condition #k1
We feel t the Examiner errored in fact and law in establishing a 20 foot landscape
buffer along the north and east property lines for the following reason.
1. The requirement for a 20 foot buffer substantially exceeds the present ordinance
requir ' nts of a 5 foot landscape buffer. Development requirements should
be key dd to adopted ordinance standards which are the implementing tools of
the c prehensive plan.
2. The 20 foot landscape buffer far exceeds other similar requirements within
the Ci y for the same type of development and therefore has little established
preced, t or law. However, precedent has been established with the Safeway
Store development being built under existing zoning code requirements for a
5 foot landscaped buffer along the north property line. The Safeway Store
is an integral part of the shopping center design. Future shopping center
buildings will most likely abut the Safeway Store on the east. Therefore,
a title building line should;be established. A 20 foot landscaped buffer
abutt' g a 5 foot buffer will create a mismatch at the line between the expanded
center buildings and the Safeway Store. This does not provide for a continuity
with e development.
3. An ex tion of existing and proposed land uses north and east of the subject
site indicates undeveloped area, commercial or potentially commercial/multiple
family deveopment. Therefore, the true fact is that the 20 foot buffer is
unnecessary. No substantial existing or proposed single family residential
area i adjacent on either side of the site, substantiating the need for such
a buff r. A 5 - 10 foot landscaped buffer is normally acceptable for such
instan es.
i
i
We hope ' t this information will be helpful to you in understanding our appeal
and our co cerns for a logical and reasonable rezone approval. This will assure
a more r-.;iistic and uninterrupted community shopping center development.
7GVVo `! 4 ' , -
czdf
chael L. Smith, President
CITY OF RENTON
N.?23849
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
RENT N, WASHINGTON 9 805 5 1 19
RECEIVED OF
p7
6-0 0
TOTAL C5v 0
GWEN E. MARSHA FAN DIRECTOR
B
1
July 21 , 1982
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF . RENTON
REPORT AND 'ECOMMENDATIONITO THE RENTON CITY. COUNCIL,
APPLICANT: Bennett-Multivest, et al ; FILE NO. R-024-82
LOCATION: North side of N.E. 4th Street, approximately 950 feet east of
Union Avenue N.E.
SUMMARY OF REQ EST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G-1 and
R-3 to B-1 for development of a' proposed community shopping
center.
SUMMARY OF Building & Zoning Department: Approval with restrictive'
RECOMMENDATION: covenants.
Hearing Examiner: Approval with restrictive covenants.
1
BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department staff report was received by
DEPARTMENT RE'ORT: the Examiner on June 22, 1982.
I
PUBLIC HEARING : ' After reviewing the Building & Zoning Department report,
examining available information on file with the application,
and field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing w-s opened on June 29, 1982 at 11 : 12 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municioal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
Roger Blayloc , Zoning Administrator, presented the Building & Zoning Department report,
and entered t e following exhilbits into the record:
Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Building & Zoning
D'epar,tment report, letter from Triad Associates ,
dated June 14, 1982 regarding half-street
improvements east of the site, and other
pertinent documents
Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map
Exhibit #3: Zoning Map in vicinity of subject site
Exhibit #4: Comprehensive Land Use Designations overlaid
on Aerial Map
Exhibit #5: Conceptual Site Plan Map (not binding on city
or applicant)
The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was :
Michael Smith
17422 108th Avenue S.E.
Renton, WA 98055
Responding'_ to the Examiner's inquiry regarding ownership of the property, Mr. Smith advised
control by B-nnett-Multivest Partnership with the property to the west, not part of the
rezone, owned by the Safeway Corporation. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding
whether th'e applicant would be willing to stipulate by covenant that the subject site would
be developed as a unified whol,le, Mr. Smith was uncertain if he had the authority to respond;
however, iit is the intent of the applicant to provide a planned shopping center on the
site along t e lines of the conceptual site plan.
Mr. Smith Ire iewed his educational and professional background as an urban planner, and
indicatedjco currence with the staff report as presented. He noted the possibility of
future rezoning of seven additional acres owned by the applicant to the east of the subject
site followi g establishment of the Safeway facility to the west which could increase the
size of the -hopping center t,o 21 acres in size. Reviewing various documents submitted
with the pplication, Mr. Smilth noted that written reports for the environmental checklist
and the rezo a request outlined in detail various requirements for the rezone, environmental
impacts of t e proposal , and Olso include a traffic report. He described the purpose of the
rezone ofIth eight-acre site to provide for expansion of the six-acre business-zoned
Safeway site to the west allowing creation of a commercial hub. Uses surrounding, the
R-024-82 Page Two
subjec site were discussed, and it was noted that existing single family homes on the
subjecr site will be removed as phasing occurs. Mr. Smith advised that the only conflicting '
land u:e surrounding the site is a single family residence quite a distance to the north,
and re?one of that property in conformance with the comprehensive plan is intended by the
owner n the near future. He indicated that a small amount of business zoning exists on
other quadrants of the intersection of Union and N.E. 4th, but none approach a sufficient
property size to develop a viable commercial node, and, consequently, a hodgepodge of strip
develolment has occurred. Additionally, many of the larger business zoned sites in the
area have been developed for multifamily use.
Review ng conformance of the proposal to the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Smith referenced
genera land use objective No. 1 , which states that land use decisions should be consistent
with alailable community facilities , utilities and transportation in the area, and the
third •olicy which states that land development should progress logically from west to
east i i the Renton plateau. He advised that development of. the site is shown as a major
commercial node on the comprehensive plan land use map element and is the next logical
step f.Ir growth in the area.
Prior ie review of existing and proposed residential developments in the area to illustrate
the need for a commercial shopping center, Mr. Smith submitted a petition into the record
which ilpd been circulated among the residents of Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park in support
of the iroposal , which was entered as follows:
Exhibit #6: Petition from Leisure Estates (89 signatures) _ ,
The following developments were described: Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park on Union south
of the .ubject site, 250 existing and 200 proposed units; Ventura Partnership condominiums
on the north side of N.E. 4th on the west side of Union, 240 units ; U. S. Homes/Terrace
Project on N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue N.E. , 280 units ; ERADCO project on N.E. 3rd
Street, 400 units; Cascadia (Northward) PUD to the north of the subject site, approximately
700 units; Fernwood Subdivision south of the site, 75 homes with a parcel north of that
site wh ch could be developed to a density of 60-80 units ; Vantage Point Condominiums to
the west , 96 units ; Clark-Rich Condominiums north of the site, 12 units. These eleven
project create a total of 2,850 units in the general vicinity of the subject site.
Reviewil, g other policies of the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Smith advised conformance of the
proposal
to Policy No. 8 of the Land Use Objective; Policy No. 1 and No. 6 of the
Commercial Development Objective; and Policy No. 1 of the Utilities Objective which requires
availab^ lity of sanitary sewers as a prerequisite for new land development. The Examiner
noted tat testimony by a representative of the Public Works Department would be requested
later ii the hearing regarding the capacity of lines in the area. Mr. Smith noted that a
commercial development does not create a high demand upon sanitary sewer facilities
compare to residential development, and in some instances , septic tank facilities have
successlolly served certain Safeway store facilities. Regarding the land use element of the
plan, h felt that although an office park designation alone in the area of the subject
site would probably not support itself or be economically desirable, a substantial
commercial area could be compatible with proposed office use and stimulate that type of
develop ent. The market area would extend out in a funnel-shaped pattern from 1-405,
widening as it goes east along N.E. 4th Street, and the subject site is of sufficient size
and regiired amenities to support that market area.
Respond ng to the Examiner's inquiry regarding timing of removal of single family homes
on the ite and access to those homes by an easement from N.E. 4th through portions of
the sub ect site, Mr. Smith stated that the homes are owned by the applicant and would
remain
1n
that 'ownership or rented during the phasing process which is proposed from west
to east ) He noted that phasing could occur within a year or within three to four years.
The accss could remain or be shifted to the east since control of the seven acres adjoining
that parcel remains with the applicant.
1.
The Exa finer requested testimony by a representative of the Public Works Department to
respond Ito the issue of availability of sewer service to serve the subject site. Responding
was :
I Bob Bergstrom
Engineering Supervisor
I
Mr. Ber.strom stated that the project site lies east of Union Avenue N.E. in the Heather
Downs drainage basin which drains south to the Cedar River complex. The existing sanitary
sewer o Union flows approximately 200 feet south to N.E. 4th Street, then west into the
old Citl of Renton collection sewer system. The 8-10 inch sewer system is presently at.
capacit at 7th and Sunset, and property owners do occasionally experience flooding. The
subject Isite could be served two ways, either by pump system which flows westerly into the
existin. sanitary sewer system and provide small improvements downstream where sewage
shifts nto the King County-City of Renton shop interceptor which then flows out to the
Cedar R ver Metro trunk, or by gravity sewers flowing south into the Heather Downs community
south o" N.E. 4th Street. Both of those options will require capital improvements to
I
Y
R-024-82 Page Three
accommodate! service to the site.
Responding for the applicant was:
Robert Terry
15804 S.E. 24th
Bellevue, WA 98008
Mr. Terry, District Manager for Safeway Stores in Bellevue and Renton, reviewed his
background an experience in selecting proposed sites for the grocery chain. He indicated
that the mark t research development division in Oakland, California had done an extensive
survey of the area and had determined that the timing of establishing an additional store
was economically feasible at this time. The other two Safeway stores in the city have
expansion con traints , and the subject site was determined to be a logical location to
serve the gro ing market in the northeast quadrant of the city. The property has been
purchased, an funding for construction and the design concept have both been approved
for the new s ore scheduled to open in July, 1983. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry
regarding the impact on the existing Safeway store in the Renton Highlands , Mr. Terry
stated that t e majority of population growth from the east and southeast would justify
an additional store,-and the proposal will contain approximately 43,500 square feet and
a variety of epartments to accommodate customers who prefer one-stop shopping convenience.
He encouraged approval of the requested rezone to allow expansion of the proposed shopping
center in the future. Mr. Terry confirmed Mr. Smith's testimony regarding operation of
other stores n a septic tank system since the use generates very little sewage, and
advised the r-ason the Duvall and N.E. 4th Street site was not, selected for the Safeway
facility was •ue to existence of a major intersection which creates traffic and access ,
problems into the site.
The Examiner equested further testimony in support of the application. There was no
response. He then invited testimony in opposition. Responding was :
George A. Kresovich
I
Hillis , Phillips , Cairncross , Clark & Martin
403'Columbia Street
Seattle, WA 98104
Mr. Kresovich, representing G. M. Associates, indicated that testimony would be provided
by consultant. for his client: The Examiner then affirmed all parties wishing to testify.
Responding wa
Wi l 'l iam E. -Popp 1
William E. Popp Associates
10655 N.E. 4th Street
i
Seattle Trust Building, Suite 400
Bellevue, WA 98004
Responding; to Mr. Terry's comments regarding the desirability of a shopping center at the
intersectilon of Duvall and N.E. 4th Street , Mr. Popp stated that the site had been analyzed
for projecte. conditions in 1986 considering substantial growth in traffic from the east
and north, a d that intersection has been planned accordingly with left turn channelization
and pavement widening. In his opinion, the traffic in that location will operate
efficiently. He noted an error in the traffic report prepared for the subject rezone,
which mistak:nly identifies Union Avenue as a four-lane arterial and Duvall Avenue as a two-
lane roadway when the reverse is true. Also, the report suggests the need for a two-way
left turn la e on N.E. 4th Street, and considering the traffic volume, Mr. Popp felt that
a two-way le't turn lane is a mandatory improvement.
Responding was:
Jerry Buck, Director of Planning
Triad Associates
11415 N.E. 128th Street
Kirkland, WA 98033
Mr. Buck discussed his opinion that Duvall Avenue now and in the future is the only street
capable of h ndling full improvements to accommodate traffic for a shopping center, noting
that near. N.E. 4th Street) Duvall is a 100-foot wide right-of-way which narrows to 86 feet
to the north Union Avenue N.E. is a 60-foot wide right-of-way which, because of existing
development, will not be able to be widened in the future. Furthermore, the .seven acres
now owned by the applicant to the east of the proposed rezone site is in a configuration
where only a portion could serve as an extension of the shopping center, topographic
constraints of the property would require substantial filling to allow development, and
the site abu s established single family residential uses. Mr. Buck felt that the existing
B-1 zoned property lying west of the subject site would be more appropriately developed
for office u-es than retail/commercial use given the surrounding residential uses since
office use c-n more easily be made appropriate neighbors than a large scale retail shopping
center.
1
R-024-82 Page Four
Responding was:
David Halinen
Triad Associates
11415 N.E. 128th
Kirkland, WA 98033
Addres•,ing the sanitary sewer capacity, Mr. Halinen ,objected to Mr. Blaylock's assertion
that i "
I the applicant is served by the sewer main north from Heather Downs Subdivision,
the Be . ett-Multivest development would be served first. The Examiner clarified that Mr.
Blaylo•I 's testimony will be weighed. Mr. Halinen stated that given_ problems with
the exit- ting facility to the west down N.E. 4th Street and that the site under consideration
is in -' different sewage drainage basin, he requested that should approval of the rezone
be grad ed, the Hearing Examiner require that a sewer system be provided by gravity to the
south. ( Support of that proposal is given in the draft EIS for the Northeast Quadrant
Compre -nsive Plan.
Mr. Smith stated his belief that each proposed rezone should stand on its own merits in
accord- ce with rezone procedures. He indicated that the Safeway facility provides an
anchor in the proposed shopping center which will draw a large number of other developments
in the alarmed center approach, further supporting approval of the rezone. Responding to
comment. regarding traffic improvements, he noted that plans for channelization and left
turn 1 -' e along N.E. 4th Street would be reviewed with staff to provide a logical
development of that facility. Additionally, the intersection has recently been upgraded
and is apable of accommodating the proposal , and there is no need or intention of
wideninu Union Avenue N.E. in the future. Responding to comments regarding development
constraints of the additional seven-acre site to the east, Mr. Smith indicated that the
site is not under review at the hearing, and the subject site is of sufficient size to
accomm.Qate the proposed shopping center and provide for parking, circulation, landscaping
and setacks. Options for provision of sanitary sewer to either the west or south will be
reviewe1 with staff as the project proceeds.
Mr. Kre1ovich objected to testimony regarding provision of an anchor by development of a
Safeway store which he felt was neither relevant nor germaine to the land use issue. He
support-d inclusion of the condition regarding gravity sewer to the south if approval of
the rezi ne is granted because unless it is imposed, the policy of the Northeast Quadrant
ComprehlInsive Plan will not be fulfilled to ensure that sewers should be logically provided
to serum planned development.
i
The ExaEinerentered the record of the previous public hearing, File No. R-019-82, G. M.
Associees rezone, into the record as Exhibit #7. He then requested an additional 14-day
period in which to publish a recommendation regarding the matter. Since there was no
objection, the hearing regarding File No. R-024-82 was closed by the Examiner at 12:35 p.m.
FINDING'', CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examine now makes and enters the following:
FINDING':
1 . The pplicant, Bennett-Multivest, et al , filed a request for a reclassification of
app .ximately 8.5 acres from G-1 (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot
siz 35,000 square feet) and R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) to B-1 (Business/
Com 1-rcial ) .
2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Building
and Ironing Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the
rec. d as Exhibit #1 .
I
3. Purs , ant to the. City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Poli 'ly Act of 1971 , RCW 43.21C , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has
been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) ,
resp )nsible official .
4. Plan for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. The .ubject site is located on the north side of N.E. 4th Street and east of Union
Aven e N.E. by approximately 950 feet.
6. The ubject site was annexed into the city by Ordinance No. 2290 in November of
19661 . It was automatically classified G-1 at that time. .The westernmost dogleg
was eclassified to R-3 by Ordinance No. 2307 in February of 1967. A portion of the
subject site was considered for a reclassification to R-3 in 1977. That request was
den i V,d.
1
t
ti
R-024-82 Page Five
7. The site is generally level although it slopes downward toward the northeast.
8. The Comprehensive Plan's map element indicates that the subject site is suitable
for the ,de)elopment of commercial uses. The commerical. policies and objectives of
the Northe st Comprehensive Plan indicate that only one community shopping center
should be stablished in the general area. The areas generally designated are the
northwest, northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of N.E. 4th Street
and Union venue. N.E. and the northeast corner of the intersection of N.E. 4th Street
and Duvall Avenue N.E. The subject site is east of the northeast corner of 4th and
Union. Th policy indicates that after implementation of a shopping center at one
of these 1 cations , the other location should be reanalyzed for appropriate uses.
The Commer ial Development Policy No. 6 reads as follows:
The,Land Uz e Mtn neeogwizez that one community-4 caYe retail 4hopp-,ng eenten
20+ ae .e4) L6 jurti4 ed by the anticipated manfzet lion the area c iong N.E. 4th
witan he cityty £ mLto dwvu,ng the lie ob the plan. Sui4icient area .us
dm,ignated at N.E. 4th Stneet and Union Avenue N.E. to pnov.ide lion community
shopping 4aciZitLez at the nonthwe,t, nonthea t, and .southeast eonneu and
avaLea.b e at the nonthea6t cornet. oU N.E. 4th and Duvall. Only one 04 these
eonnefc4 . hou1d be developed ass a netaie ihopp.ing eentete. Upon imp!ementati.on
o6 one hopping eomp.2ex, the Compnehen4-Lve P.ean should be evacuated ,6on
appna pAiate u6 e o 4 the nema in.Lng conneni. "
9. The applicant proposes developing a community shopping center in conjunction with
adjacent p operty to the west already appropriately zoned B-1 . The property to
the west i owned by Safeway stores which plans to develop a supermarket on the
site.
A gasoline station is located on the immediate northeast corner of N.E. 4th and
Union Aven e N.E.
10. Four singl - family homes are located on the subject site. These homes would be
removed as the development proceeds from west to east. An easement roadway crosses
the subject site to provide access to homes on landlocked property to the north of
the site. Owners of these latter parcels have suggested a roadway be constructed
on the east perimeter of the subject site to these properties. -
11 . There are a variety of uses in the vicinity of the subject site. Aside from the
gasoline service station to the southwest of the site, another service station is
located w=st of the intersection. A convenience store and bank are located south
of the si e. A twelve-unit condominium is located immediately west of the subject
site' s westerly dogleg.
Vacant pr perty is located east of the subject site and was suggested for possible
easterly xpansion of the proposed shopping center. Single family homes are located
east of t at parcel and also north of the site along Union Avenue N.E.
12. The applicant has not indicated the specific uses which would be incorporated into
the cente , but with the Safeway store, the uses -would include at least a supermarket,
and probably convenience hardware and drugstores. The .traffic generation/attraction
of the site depends on the specific uses , but it is estimated at approximately 8,400
trips per day. The current vehicle trips per day on roadways in the area are
approximately 19,000.
13. Sewer service is available at Union Avenue N.E. and could be extended to the subject
site but the line has downstream capacity problems . Capacity is available in the
Heather Downs trunk to the south and an extension would also be required to tie into
that line. The Union Avenue hookup would require a pump station while the Heather
Downs hookup would be gravity fed.
14. There is vailable capacity in the water mains inIthe vicinity of the subject site.
15. The inter ection of Union Avenue N.E-. and N.E. 4th Street is controlled by a traffic
signal '. oth streets are city arterials and Union Avenue N.E. has a 60-foot right-of-
way.
16. ,The applicant proposes developing approximately 139, 117 square feet of leasable area o-
on the su.ject site and adjacent westerly site.
17. A proposal to develop a community shopping center for the northeast corner of
N.E. 4th and Duvall Avenue N.E. (File No. R-019-82, G. M. Associates) has also been
submitted to the city and both public hearings were held the same day. While each
location must be able to meet the criteria enumerated in Section 4-3014, because
Policy 6 of the Northeast. Renton Comprehensive Plan indicates only one shopping center
I
r
J
R-024-82 Page Six
alng the N.E. 4th corridor, the two proposals were presented as clearly in
co petition for approval .
18. Th- city utilized a market analysis prepared for the G. M. Associates rezone request
t•Iconclude that a community shopping center was appropriate for the area, although
thi- specific site was not reviewed (See Finding No. 15 of File No. R-019-82) .
19. Ot' er zoning in the area consists of a relatively large B-1 district straddling the
4t , and Union intersection and running west as far as Monroe Avenue N.E. R-3 zoning
is located northwest of the site and-T (Mobile Home Park) zoning is south on the
wet side of Union.
CONCLUwIONS:
1 . Th- proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest
an!i will not impair the public health , safety and weTfare. In addition, the rezone
mu-t comply with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3014 which
provides in part that:
a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area rezone or land
use analysis; or
b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the
Comprehensive Plan; or
c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area
in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or
area.
As indicated below, the applicant has demonstrated that the subject site has the
ch .racteristics. necessary for the development of a community shopping center, but
thrre is 'still the proviso of the Comprehensive Plan which indicates that only one
coimunity shopping center should be located within the N.E. 4th Street corridor in
the vicinity of Union Avenue N.E. and Duvall Avenue N.E. Since two proposals for
th is type of development in that corridor were presented for review simultaneously,
it ould be appropriate to impose certain conditions so that effective implementation
wi Il occur and the general welfare enhanced.
2. Th: subject site, while not located immediately at the intersection of two major
ar .erials , •fronts on N.E. 4th Street and abuts a parcel to the west which fronts on
Unili.n Avenue N.E. The subject site will be developed in 'conjunction with that
pal el . Joint development of the two sites will permit access to theproposedshl•ping center from either N.E. 4th or Union N.E. The subject site is therefore
in a highly desirable location for a community shopping center (Policy 5.D. 1 ) .
3. While the area is currently surrounded by scattered single family uses , these uses ,
essecially to the north are in transition. While multifamily development is located
im diately west of the subject site and north of the allied parcel on which Safeway
pl - s to develop a supermarket, it provides a buffer (Northeast Comprehensive Plan,
Co unity Policy 5) and will be able to easily utilize the shopping center. The
pr•I osed use is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan map designation for the site
an. with the desi giations for the surrounding area which is for office park development
an. multifamily housing.
In rder to protect neighboring uses and comply with the landscape objectives of the
Co rehensive Plan, a twenty foot landscape buffer should be established along the
no th and east property line. Such a condition should be reviewed if the center
in•'•rporates additional property east of the subject site in which case the buffer
co 1d be moved eastward.
4. Th. intersection near which the site is located has recently been signalized and
th= intersection can accommodate the traffic which will be generated by the subject
sit- .
5. While the ability of the sewer located at Union to handle additional waste is in
douut without downstream improvements , gravity disposal to the Heather Downs system
is ossible with a developer extension.
6. Sin e the subject site is well located at the intersection of two arterials , is
gen rally well buffered or may be buffered from surrounding lesser intensive uses,
is robably large enough when developed in association with the Safeway proposal
imrr diately west, and could provide development compatible with the Comprehensive
Pla , the City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site to
B-1 subject to the condition indicated below.
R-024-82 Page Seven
7. There was no analysis of the impact of a north/south roadway on the property' s
eastern boundary and it would be premature at the rezone stage to require such a
dedication, especially since an easement for such a purpose already exists.
8. The followw1ing conclusions have been incorporated into the Examiner's Report for
File No. 1i-019-82 and this application, R-024-82 because the language of Policy No. 6
of the No-theast Comprehensive Plan.
9. Considering the two proposals separately without reference to the Comprehensive
Plan's "oche shopping center" proviso indicates that there is nothing to militate for
one propo al and against the other. Both sites are capable of sustaining the traffic,
both coul reasonably serve the same growing service area, both would concentrate
community services in one location, both will need to either improve the existing
capacity f the Union Avenue sewer or extend a line to the Heather Downs trunk,
both intend to or can be buffered from adjoining uses , and both are compatible
with many of the goals and policies of the various elements of the Comprehensive
Plan. But taken together, they could conceivably encroach on each other's service
area (Policy 5.D.3) , especially during their initial period of operation awaiting
the growth of the service area; they are fairly close together, approximately a
mile apart; and the "second" center would usurp land which the Comprehensive Plan
indicates would serve other useful purposes such as office park. Therefore, while
the condition below will not necessarily assure one viable shopping center, it
attempts to require adherence to a reasonable implementation schedule.
10. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that upon implementation of one shopping center,
the other three designated potential sites be reevaluated for other possible uses ,
possibly even another shopping center if the need is apparent.
The key word is "implementation." The Comprehensive Plan does not provide a
method of determining which one of two or more locations would be more appropriate
given :that the locations and properties appear to be equally suited for community
shopping center development or at least business/commercial uses. The problem is
compound.d because two similar proposals were submitted for evaluation at the same
time. ; Nzither development could be "implemented" without first approving a
reclassi 'ication to B-1 which is an underlying requirement for commercial development
on eithe site. • Therefore, 'the Comprehensive Plan provides only limited guidance,
but at 1 -ast establishment of a shopping center within a reasonable period of, time
should bz required. That, is , either a community shopping center is developed on
one or b.th of the respective sites within two yea'rs •or the zoning on one or both
sites ,sh.uld revert to its former status . If implementation at either site did not
occur .wilhin the time limit, the city could reanalyze what use would be in the best
interest of the public for the site or sites . This stipulation, in the nature of
a contra t reclassification of the properties has been recognized by the Washington
courts a a valid use of the zoning powers. (State ex rel . Myhre v Spokane, 70Wn2d207 (1967)
In order to also eliminate some of the potential ambiguities in determining whether
implemen ation has occurred , the applicant will have to have been issued within the
two year period a valid building permit. If the building permit granted in the two
year per od expires without being utilized as provided in the Renton Building Code,
then the zoning shall revert to its earlier classification.
11 . Rather t an encourage speculative and potentially premature reclassification of either
site whi e foreclosing the development potential of its competitor, the City Council
should approve the requested reclassification subject to the filing of restri'1ctive
covenant embodying the time frame of implementation. Policy 5.A. 1 requires that
commerci - 1 zoning only be allowed to the extent of short term needs to avoid '
speculat ve. rezones which do not benefit the public. Reasonably timely implementation
underith condition would help effectuate this policy.
RECOMMENDATI N:
The City Council should approve the requested reclassification to B-1 subject to:
1 . Provisio, of a 20-foot landscape buffer on the north and east property lines.
2. Execution of restrictive covenants implementing the condition enumerated in
Conclusibn -No. 10.
ORDERED THIS 21st day of July, 1982. i
Fred J. Kauf
Land Use Hearing Examiner
R-024-82 Page Eight
T''NSMITTED THIS 21st day of July, 1982 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties
of record:
Michael Smith, 17422 108th Avenue S.E. , Renton, WA 98055
Robert Terry, 15804 S.E. 24th, Bellevue, WA 98008
George A. Kresovich,' Hillis , Phillips , Cairncross, Clark &
Martin, 403 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 9810k
William E. Popp, 10655 N.E. 4th Street, Seattle Trust Bldg. ,
Suite 400, Bellevue, WA 93004
Jerry Buck, Triad Associates , 11415 N.E. 128th Street,
Kirkland, WA 98033
David Halinen, Triad Assocites , 11415 N.E. 128th Street,
Kirkland, WA 98033
Henry Balko, P.O. Box 68562, Seattle, WA 98168
Mary and Ed Porter, 29422 18th Avenue S. , Federal Way, WA
98003
TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of July, 1982 to the following:
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Richard Houghton , Public Works Director
David Clemens , Policy Development Director
Members , Renton Planning Commission
Ron Nelson , Building & Zoning Director
Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Renton Record-Chronicle
Pursua It to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be fi -d in writing on or before August 4, 1982. Any aggrieved Person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in
judgmet, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at
the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
14) d. s from the date of the Examiner's decision. This requestt shall set forth the
specifi errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the
record take further action as. he deems proper.
An app_': 1 to the City Council is governed' by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that
such a•
l'•
eal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting
other - •ecified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or
purcha-- in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall .
1'
4.1 9..I•,...
j.
t 8
I
1 i 01;1 s t 111114
AO •
ve• l'
Or giala •
too L ,...,,,,, .
1ii • %. -. : . • E! .
1,1!
c .,..,),-. N.
A al
l
li
fi
e R-1 f
4
t2 *-_1o... r
N If.
tr.
I10.!, c, 11,,,...t.
O
a Irv•
r' f
E=i= —
I
G+ f .
1 11
L
I .
t-R--7 J —. .
I
i , E}._
1.I '
T
Li.
r yiss3..1
41
i - 113....1 — I
7
00 4.1, -—--
ti
r 1
I
1 1 2ml-41:LH EXHIBIT. NO. 3
th F G Jj ' 1
1 RECA
Da EM NO. 1Q-oz 4-8z.
T
nerN,NG tI AM,NEN7Rt=Nw OD
CITY OF FENT
j
i
1 I
iL ]
JUN 2 1982 f
IC MET RY 1 —_,_ —O-1 c. t8t9,Md1,R,1,2,3r,5,6
P 11
I--
a W
I
rj111111
IP
i ROM 3 G 1
if 10
I .
W tom=
1
t •
I
4
d
OF RA,
A.
A
C)
4$
lb-
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
n I o BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
0'
9.
0
co.
FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-25930,
9greo SEPISI°
4
July 2, , 1982
Members, Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
RE: File No. R-019-82, G. M. Associates ; and File No. R-024-82,
Bennett-Multivest, et al .
Dear C uncil Members:
This 1 tter is offered to clarify the decisions in the above entitled
matters as there seems to be some confusion as to the implications of
those decisions.
Simply put, if both applicants comply with the time limitations , both
properties could be developed with shopping centers. The decisions did
not c eate a first come, first serve situation, although market conditions _
may dissuade the creation of a second center.
The r asoni.ng behind the dual provision was that it did not appear
appro riate to make the zoning of one of the parcels dependent upon
the a tions of the other applicant. Rather, the decision makes it
incum ent upon each applicant to diligently pursue implementation upon
his o n property.
The o her issue which was presented was that under the current zoning
code, neither site could be developed as an office park without first
also eing reclassified to B-1 . That is, the B-1 zoning would be
required to permit either a shopping center or an office park.
With those criteria in mind, the recommendation was made to grant both
reclassification requests.
Sincerely,
0.0~VO,.. .....,==Fred J . K fman
Heariiig Examiner
cc:: arties of Record
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
Codnty of King
M. rilyn J . Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath
disposes and states:
That on the 21st day of July 19 82 ,
affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing
a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the
parties of record in the below entitled application or petition.
5k-
Subscribed and sworn this day of J,.j 19 c2...,
IM)4 LiY\ • \aai, . • -•. ...
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at 2.R4p
Applic Lion, Petition or Case: Bennett-Multivest, et al ; R-024-82
The. nitinute.6 contain CC e 4,t oQ the. pan tLL5 oi) J(.P.coJt,d.
I
1
I
7
RECENED:---A
HEARiNa 'XAMt k
o d ' ' JUL 6 19a2
pF . 1 r
1 . .— _J ,4 lf..5--- 18,9l r1u a:2k A4 o64
I
I c - ea_ k?
44-
LI
I
1'
1 /
I
I
Or
I
D l"
I / _ , /
I. D Cl.
I
1
f11
I
I
L1.1(_g, (•) (-/ 3.zi.,..- ._
j__Wa-z-ti. Ix . '
y•
a_. '',4
c1-
4:1 ri/n..eLle., ,
1 i
1
N. `• .
e
e
1
1 .
Nk,
I
1 \• ,,,;
II
N
i .
I\:
1
I .
i .
N) '
t,i
NI ' '
I ‘
Li • ,
1I ,,'
1 . ,
s
1.
I
I
NN\ '
i ,
iflr ::
3
Illi /
I
II.
L.
1
e.
1N.
I
1
1
If1/41 . \
1 .
bn
II,-
r •
i*
i ,...
J
i •
11
1 .
A II--. 74-7....•- 12-e.).A.1
I, p v 7 ,. i
A 0 , ,, - ! '-: !•,) ......••••••...
m...
I-;L_ul i'-• ,..2. t„.;-._ 1 :.. —
I
16z° • aY'/ ‘ g:
7 0',;`>,..„„
ijA-, _ SA
111,,,•....,,,,,---
A - ---
C)1"
7
7
77(
fe ,5- 6
RECEIVED
EXHIBIT PT®. 6
CITY
H AROF E ENTON TE O. .l- 0 `i- 0-
TNGJUN291982 PETITION
AM
7,8,9,10i11-,12ii,2 3141516
To: Renton Planning Commission and City Council
We, the undersigned, support the amendment of the NE Renton
Comprehensive Plan to include commerical land use along the north
side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and Duvall Avenue NE.
Such a conveniently located commercial area of substantial size
to accommodate a variety of stores and services is greatly '
needed for existing and future residents of this area.
NAME ADDRESS
t‘
4., 6z..
1,„,„.' -
ag,..... ze,,..„.. du .5-7E- p. a
L.', , V
2(9 .1 46,---,i4,-€...f,-1-C-) atiLP , J. e.1 -24 .2.:, ,,
i.
le 4..."-e-e, r ('''
L.
ti2b, s1ti C. i L4 1 .x I , e --
f
f;
r
r c1 `,
t. /
i. f'/ '
a,-
f., e-. 7.U ( (i`s•{ r c; •'. 1 t, P C, { : Sr-s, ;
i
r
y\ an _ -(7-- )2)261
7224 Qom, l e
a.G S sp/6s'
a. goy Otu.e. SR 46 f
t14u
e..._,a_..)
Jo'
e 4 e.o/ 4/-><-e.., 64, sue- xe /3 a .
ZAN' ar44.47 20 / LJ4 , - SA 3.
974 -_- a o
I' 4i Q/A5 3
6
0'70/ eihte S /573...
r
a / 76k- 7l
r
z. ,
t ,
t .`
ion
u
Z./. ' _i_ ..„2",-7_4_, 04 , -a-6 / 2,....."2.--....0.,-- _s- .... . -d
q 0 , ,: ,21,,,, A q Se 4Q-- 73
1%71-7 • ---au--5. 7
i14eC4 Ai- ,.... Gee j 57
f
G
b
I
NAME A D D R E S S
I
CL(3--P-4 ,4,4„ ,,,,,
ac a j --7-4,,,:„,, C24-e_...7 6r 3042.. i .7 4
r° 2 0/ • U ,/ Aire.-S 1 // / r
4., 0 . 4,
10/
7 t,'..-o-e.-r._.o-a1/4.- e--b-e. ty r.-. a 7
i t
40/ r r.0 s d Se 77
9. ,,,i. ,,. ..: „ z„., a.„. eke y7
11
All
fit 01:0 le,..., 2di PA', 4%2
7
raiva dZ.-;)-(4
r
Baia ff./-C R /y'
c•/ ems
024z- I. 07, /47O
VV.2o if 2 L.- S•e'.
7/2 0/ U. Sz. _- 2_3
r moo/ s 3.
a 4
ai
7
4- I) I ,
2
27FCL 1 41- Yo/ Qe5' . - /d 3—
Cli.L4zt,,e,c,J ril---ez-e7a-c- --, c,2 0 ( 'A c , -/
b
5-7
20 ,1 I .
1
m /
7
2(2 6 I
i,
r /I
2 3"0
it te-
v/A:.,?1 DA/ IFO 4 de_lc
c( i( /(
d
s9
1
O
J
5,VV /
I
aP44.Arf-aevi .- ,-. . 5 --./
We'')
fl off`'Pfg 1114 c -s ,6' #' 9g
L / u. 01 kim,t,14... co74. .3. a . # 9 g
r. r5./3
1
297 sf
i'
g '
T 20
v (/
42. •44. 1/
az 0/
1 , D2,26.
cao(
i L3<g,
V l
t(C&A'‘'' '
r` w
N E
l
ADDRESS
C>2 ./ P-i'Le-e1X. E
2 0 / 5.C: #.Z.,
1
0........ . , 1 4I.YJ•
i0 /-Z- f/e49(riki•--- .
st -,144
7' I l - • 2 c (K 0-. t. . _
4--
Y,
X',f,. .'
1, 1 1
14
7 s"-
4 1IM .L __._
t 4/
t/
i/
C '',. '''- ':'
1,-) (--"`- /
k 1 l i it
zfp')
r A____414)4)2',4.0 I
61/
le 11
I- :
1 1 .
ia_fe_
46......„zZai
2-)7,7-i!:Certo-yr ...or
7.ilig."" 1 1 • 11 :';;
7-64/7/ c
1 (
t l L \ #
i ,1
q,.
s
i
4/'
i c
r
l c ( el l3.2
4..),,e0, .,,,T. 0 / /
14) E-- 0,40-h
6 ! ' C .
a y
AMMI
T i
y. ,CIATES
ENGINEER NG SURVEYING PLANNING RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
JUN1 '8198
June i14 1982 AM PM
718/9110,1111211021314v5v6
1
Hearing Examiner
City 1of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055 1
1
Subjec : Proposed Bennett-Multivest Rezone
R-024-82)
Dear S ' r:
As rep esentatives of our client, Mr. Don Maletta, 1509 N.
24th Street, Renton, ' WA 98056, we wish to request that if
the Be nett-Multivest rezone (R-024-82) is approved, such
approv-1 be subject to the following pre-effective condition:
1
l. That the proponents of the Bennett-Multivest rezone be
I required to provide half-street improvements along the
eastern boundary of the rezone property.
Our Cl ent, Mr. Don Maletta, owns property (Tax Lot 148) lo-
cated northeast of the rezone property, in the interior of
the bl ck generally bounded by Union Avenue N.E. , N.E . 4th
Street Duvall Avenue N.E. and N.E. 6th Street (if ext. ) .
At pIlre ent, there is no access to this interior lot.
Access to this lot and other interior lots along the eastern
bourda y of the Bennett property would be consistent with
logical planning practice. It would provide access at mid-
block etween Union Avenue N.E. and Duvall Avenue N.E. and
would efine an effective edge to the proposed shopping center
to be ocated on the rezone property and to potential office
or mul i-family residential development to the east as well .
City o Renton Building and Zoning Department staff has re-
cently discussed the importance of providing mid-block access
and' thru-connections to interior lots of this large block
refer to Staff Report to the Hearing Examiner, Application
No. ,IPP-031-82) . Access at this requested location could
conne.t to a similar mid-block connection from the west off
of Union Avenue N.E. at some point north of the rezone pro-
perty. Half-streetlimprovements provided as a condition of
1
11415 N.E.148th Street•Kirkland, Washington 98033•(206) 821-8448
i
i I
Page Tw+
June 14, 1982
Hearing Examiner
City lof Renton I
rezone approval would insure adequate access to our clients '
interior lot and other such parcels and would allow efficient
circula ion in the immediate vicinity.
i I
In the interest of our client, we request that you carefully
consider our arguments prior to the scheduled June 29th hear-
ing on the proposed rezone, and condition approval of the
Bennet -Multivest Rezone to the provision of half-street im-
provem nts along theleastern boundary. We believe that the
interests of the City and all property owners in the immediate
area w' ll be best served by the imposition of this condition
should this rezone by approved.
Sincer ly,
TRIAD ASSOCIATES
Michae J. Blumen
MJB/na
cc: Rlger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator
R chard Houghton, Director of Public Works
J_m Matthew, Fire Marshal
i I
I
i I
I
I I
l I
I
I
i:,UILIIDIlG AND ZONINGG DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE mEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JUNE 29 , 1982
APPLICANT: BENNETT-MULTIVEST, ET AL.
FILE NUMBER: R-024-82
A. SUMMARY PURPOSE OF ,•*UEST:
The applicant seeks to rezone the subject site from
G-1 & R-3 to B-1 for a proposed community. shopping center.
B. GENERAL INFO r,,.\TIOO:
1 . Owner of Record: Richard Grant, Del
Bennett, James da Silva,
Henry Balko, James I
R. Beattie, Layne
P. Bryant.
2. Applicant: Bennett-Multivest,
et al.
3. Location:
Vicinity Map Attached) North side of N.E.
4th Street approximately
950 feet east of
Union Avenue N. E.
Legal Description: A detailed legal
description is available
on file in the Renton
Building & Zoning
Department.
Size of Property: 8. 5 acres .
6. Access :Via N.E. 4th Street.
7. Existing Zoning: G-1 , General Classification
District; R-3 , Residence
Multiple Family
Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1 ; R-3 ; B-1 , Business
Use.
Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial
0. Notification: The applicant was notified
in writing of the hearing
date. Notice was properly
published in the Daily '
Record Chronicle on
June 18 , 1982, and
posted in three places
on or near the site
as required by City
Ordinance on June
18 , 1982 .
PRDtIMINARY REPORT T( IE HEARING EXAMINER
BE I ETT-MULTIVEST, ET AL.
JU 29, 1982
PAe. TWO
C. HIS O1IE/ rmi ;,GrOUND:
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance
No. 2290 of November 23, 1966 at which time the G-1
zoning was established. The R-3 portion was rezoned
from G-1 by Ordinance No. 2302 of February 22 , 1967 .
D. Pro!SICAL zAC G A;. :
1 . Topography: The subject site is relatively level
with a slight downward slope to the northeast.
2. Soils: Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Permeability
is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil
and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow
and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is
used for timber, pasture, berries, row crops and
for urban development.
3. Vegetation: The site has been cleared and regenerated
with deciduous trees of alder, maple and cottonwood
with some scattered evergreens remaining. Some
shrubs are apparent near the existing residence
and additional ground cover consisting of scrub
brush and grasses.
4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation provides some
habitat for birds and small mammals.
5. Water: Nb surface water was observed on the subject
site (June 18, 1982) although seasonal drainage
ditches are to the west of the property and near
N.E. 4th Steet on the south side of the site.
6. Land Use: The subject site has four existing single
family dwellings on the property. To the northeast,
the land is generally undeveloped with a floor
coveringand carpet business and real estateofficep
situated east. A convenience store and bank are
on the south with service stations to the southwest
and west. A small unit condominium complex is
adjacent on the northwest.
E. NEI,eim,s m:,OO® CHARACTERISTICS:
The surrounding properties are a combination of low
density single and multiple family structures and light
office and service commercial.
F. SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer: An eight-inch water main extends
east-west on N. E. 4th Street adjacent to the subject
site while the nearest sewer is an eight-inch sanitary
pipe running north-south on Union Avenue N.E. approximately
400 feet to the west.
2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton
as per ordinance requirements.
3. Transit: METRO Transit Route #107 operates along
Union Avenue N.E. within 400 feet to the west.
4. Schools : Not applicable.
PRELIMINARY REPO], PO THE HEARING EXAMINER ,
BENNETT-MULTIVES'1' ET AL.
JUNE '29 1982
PAGE 1TH EE
15. Recreation: Not applicable.
G. 'AP LIC I:1f„R SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1 . Section 4-71 ,B-1 ; Business District.
2. Section 4-729, G-1 ; General Classificatin District.
H. INETLIDP4LE SECTIONS OF I m co :COMPIxTANSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
ppgicIAL CITY DOCUMENT:
1 . Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan (1981 ) , Commercial,
5.A-4, 5.B-4 , 5.B-5 and 5.D
I. v ArC'T ON THE NATURALTURAL, OR :; Ii'i; IN ENVIRONMENT:
1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site
will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils,
increase storm water runoff and have an affect
on traffic and noise levels in the vicinity. Through
propert; development controls and procedures , however,
1 many of these impacts can be mitigated.
2. Population/Employment: The proposal will not directly
affect population levels in the area, although
it may stimulate a certain amount of growth and
will provide come increased opportunities for employment.
3. Schools : Not applicable.
4. Social: Construction of a shopping center could
provide increased opportunities for social interaction
among the area residents.
5. Traffic : The proposed shopping center would increase
traffic in the vicinity by approximately 8 ,400
average daily trips. This would represent approximately
a 44% increase in traffic over the present level •
of 18, 988' average daily trips .
I
J. E1 Vi, I.u.NmV N' 'AL ASSESSMENT/ IISI.OLD DETERMINATION:
1 .
Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance
and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended,
RCW 43-21C, a final declaration of non-significance
Was issued for the subject proposal by the ERC on April
122 , 1982.
K. A LIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
11. City of Renton Building & Zoning Department.
2Z. City of Renton Design Engineering Division.
3,. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division.
4j. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division.
51. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau.
61. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department.
7. City of Renton Policy Development Department.
L. DE' RTiET ANALYSIS: '
1 '. The applicant seeks a rezone from G-1 , General
Use, and R-3 Multiple Family Residential, to B-1 ,
Business Use, of 8. 5 acres for the development
of a community shopping center. The 8. 5 acre rezone
would be developed in conjunction with a +5. 7 acre
parcel which is currently zoned B-1 . The shopping
center is proposed in two phases which will ultimately
total 1 39 , 11 7 square feet of leasable commercial
area.
iRELIMINARY REPORT Tn THE HEARING EXAMINER
ENNETT-MULTIVEST,AL
UNE 29, 1982
AGE FOUR
2. The property was annexed into the City in 1966 ,
at which time the G-1 zoning was established.
An R-3 Multiple Family Residential Classification
was applied in 1967 to approximately 1 . 4 acres
of the subject site. That property has remained
undeveloped since that time.
An adjacent parcel rezoned to R-3 at the same time
was just constructed upon during the last year.
Most of the nearby B-1 Business Use zoning was
implemented in the late 1960 ' s .and early 1970 ' s.
Development of those areas occured primarily during
the last ten years with the City processing several
major building permits to remodel and update those
original commercial facilities built in the 1970 ' s
within the last two years. The property immediately
adjacent to the site was originally zoned in 1967,
with a subsequent addition in 1968 . Only a single
service station has been constructed on that original
6+ acre rezone. This would suggest that the rezoning
in the 60 ' s was premature.
During the last several years, major utility improve-
ments including sanitary sewer and storm water
sewers have been brought to adjacent parcels with
enough capacity to handle a community shopping
center at this location. Major intersection improve-
ments have been completed at N.E. 4th Street and
Union Avenue N.E. These private and public improve-
ments would suggest that the site complies with
rezone criteria under Section 4-3014 (C) (1 ) (c) of
the Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance.
3. Since the rezone approval from G, General Use Classifi-
cation, to R-3, Residential Multiple Family, in
1967 , the property has not been specifically considered
by a rezone request. The Comprehensive Plan amendment
in 1981 , specifically enlarged the commercial designation
on the northeast corner of Union Avenue N.E. and
N.E. 4th Street. Therefore, this appears to be
comply with the first rezone justification criteria
Section 3014 (C) (1 ) (a) ] .
4. The third criteria requires compliance with the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Goals and Policies
of the Northeast Quadrant. The proposal specifically
complies with the Commercial designation on the
Land Use Map and generally complies with the Goals
and Policies.
The implementing policies of the Northeast Compre-
hensive Plan are specifically broken down into
1 ) land use, (2) commercial development, (3) community
facilities, (4) transportation, (5) arterial street
improvements, and (6) utilities.
A. LAND USE:
Out of the five applicable policies of the
Land Use Objective, the proposed rezone specifi-
cally complies with policies No. 1 and No.
3. The subject site has available transportation,
community facilities and utilities. All of
these services are at present level to provide
immediate service to the subject site. Develop-
ment of the site would correspond with the
policy of logically developing land in a west
to east progression on the East Renton Plateau.
Policies No. 2 , No. 7 and No. 8 are design
review policies with specific consideration
at the time of building permit review. In
general, in the schematic development plans
provided at this time, the proposal does not
PRELIMINARY REPO-- TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
BENNETT-f'1ULTIVES ET AL
JUNE 29, 1982
PAGE FIVE
call for mixing residential with business
uses . The proposal appears to be strictly
commercial development. Evaluation of adjoining
land uses upon approval of any community shopping
center would have to be done to consider appropri-.
ateness, however, the Land Use Hearing Examiner
has in several cases considered specialized
setbacks to buffer existing or potential use
in a rezone request for a business classi-
fication (Beal Resone) .
B. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT:
Only six of the eight policies are applicable
to this specific case. The proposal as presented
would appear to meet the intent of five of
those criteria. Emphasis should be placed
upon the ultimate design of any community
center rto minimize access points and traffic
congestion both onsite and offsite.
The sixth criteria still remain the primary issue
in the review of any B-1 , Business Use, rezone
request in this area. The market analysis provided
by G. M. Associates clearly shows the viability
of markets in this trade area. In fact, it suggests
that one center may not be enough. Policy No.
6 clearly states that there is the potential for
development on five locations in the general area
along the N.E. 4th Street corridor. Evaluation
for rezone request must be based solely upon the
merits of that specific location and its ability
to meet the rezone justification upon its own merits.
5. The issue of timeliness remains the overriding
factor when evaluating a rezone request.. timely
is defined by the Oxford American Dictionary, 1980
Edition, as an adjective meaning "occuring at just
the right time. " Therefore, to make something
timely all of the evaluation criteria should neatly
fall into place. In this specific case, the records
supports the rezone to B-1 , Business Use.
The most logical argument for the rezone is the
natural extension of the established B-1 Business
Use zone lying west of the subject site. The fact
that the +5. 5 acres has not been developed in the
last 14 years suggests one of two things. First,
that the rezone was untimely to begin with, or,
secondly, that the area involved was insufficient
to allow the development of a viable commercial
center. Based upon the characteristics of shopping
centers, page 427 of the Urban Planning and Design
Criteria by Joseph D. Chirara and Lee Koppelman,
it would appear that the original 5 . 5 acre site
was insufficient to be considered as a community
center. Most community centers are at least ten
acres and will vary upto thirty acres in size.
In fact, the proposed development of approximately
14 acres may; be insufficient to meet the real goal
of a community center. It is probable that the
adjacent seven acres controlled by the applicant
should be developed into the community shopping
center at some time in the future. Evaluation
of whether another center should be allowed or
whether one 'subregional center would be appropriate
is a determination which must be made by the Planning
Commission and City Council in the re-evaluation
of the general area for commercial centers under
policy No. 6 .
P'i 'LIMINARY REPORT TO ---E HEARING EXAMINER
B NETT-MULTIVEST, ET
J j 29, 1982
PA E SIX
6. The development of a community shopping center
is predicated upon certain market design standards
and specific site plan approval is not generally
necessary. However, the intent of the Goals and
Policies suggests two major areas of concern in
the development of any community shopping center.
The first is access and the second is integrity
and buffering of adjacent land uses . Both are
easily designed into a shopping center, but to
assure compliance they should be specifically be
limited in restrictive covenants on the rezone.
The center itself to limit traffic impacts should
be designed with as few access points as possible.
In the proposed design two major access would be
provided onto N.E. 4th.. Street and one major access
onto Union Avenue N.E. The design of these accesses
should specifically allow the queuing of vehicles
entering and exiting the site without disrupting
the function of either the streets or the parking
lot. This would result in specific left turn pockets
created on the arterials and separate access lanes
onsite.
The second concern of integrity and buffering of
adjacent land uses can be accompplished by providing
definite landscape buffers along all property boundaries.
It is suggested that a twenty foot landscaped area
should be provided along all ,property boundaries
to establish a landscape theme and focal point
for the center. Specific landscaping around another
neighborhood center has been accomplished in the
past in the development of Sunset Square by restrictive
covenants upon the rezone. (See Beal rezone, File
R-002-80. )
M. DEPARTMEMT RECO iPIAi\i;)ATIO I:
Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that
the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council approval
of the rezone request from G-1 , General Use and R-3 ,
Residential Multiple Family to B-1 , Business Use, file
R-024-82, with the following conditions :
1 . Filing of restrictive covenants to provide for
a twenty foot landscape buffer along the north,
east and south property lines.
2. Site plan approval by staff to include separation
of major access lanes from parking areas in the
site plan.
L.
ti--
1
1
I
4.)
i 0.56 Ac. I IV -
LIS A cil-,
c)
a1 ',
LI§ .,@ I 4 48 @
0
I 4
17:Innommenummir.- -- -
0
3S i
265.3 ••- 15.22
1324i. 0
0
0.674c.
0
3o
CITY OF REN
1 fE iq R, 11RliISchoolDistric3
I 7.: Earl 5 ith ii ZI 10
m
736 Ac. MAR 1 9 1 2 ,
us i
ii, 14.1 rn
1
@cluzl 1 1 • " '.
eUILDINICIZvNINOEPT1 :
1 • Ac:
02 :I
1,
7
1 a
s.„....._._.-_ ,.. ,.
3.
z... .
994 0 grsmfr __A c• v••:::/ -
I '
al-
Z--
7 -- _
c, (.54 f r_13
I
fil RENTONcoRPO'Re7e-ATE 7----
LI Ail
4
i i o' -14.5- •= 4:c. Williams11i
i
0
Lloyd v. &
Hazel c 0
00
cb
0 A.
co ---•-•.
7.7.----..:.z.-,..z..?:-..r-.1-.:-_-:::
zzzzzzzzzz
Z g;,• 621
E23
180c. 1:
0 8i
3
ei
Ruth Ve
fr30
A .
11-
0
1.'
15 354P- '...
S111
21 /.
7._., IFfilC. winiams ,
v
1.
09.44
I
Donald E.
0.93Ac. ,%.s4
94 41 23'li
4 At:.
McWilliams
314.41
IIe
L ''
309.44(
3.
e
1
Charles Ruch r I. W. Caru
fI.Ern s7-7
ID_ _.__ El ,
J. David Jensen
1111
I
i
I Z
1 4,4061, i.59Aclo ,
it -r
1, 2.39 4c.
CI
0.40 A c. 41) •
i
i..,...yri1r--55----1 ' •••••
I
i-
1
1
I I
k
I '''' •• 175 •••nS' ' 1-gSt-Tf
S8
161.o.;
col
0101 ....1
7 Sr .
1 i'•
c.) 1
L) •
Joyl D• vic Ansen i
ci
It*
0.96AI .
11
li Li 0
LT
14 Z
175 I 7s
zr
1.-.:9
1"" I m.o' r-i.I
0
4 .0--,• C13
I
Lull
C
I C tL
if ii i 2 L:14
4)
a 1
C71 rr0.3
A
44k1
0
60
till 6Q9 I: CD/
L. ".
11) d Cs•
15
I C,1,
3
1:41) I I
fa a
e
so 4'41 .. Air 1 • •••or." 2
0
r.,
Cr *a
C
7--).: •
41
el
0
ad ,
2
1 . .7
0.33 4c.
T
az So
iso
C3-z
6 i cbo ,; ii
CZ:
11L. 1..
1
0
0
C
I
I i!,
I
rs •
X . u
x "1
o• Li
a -
x'1
I.. g.
11 IP < CC;
se•v.
04. 1 I
i in .4,
i.: ....xi
C;1.1 f4....
r- 4,..i.:
0, -: '
i f
1 '
4
R ,.,-.•
if
i
i o .peo
0.7i 4
U.° 4
214.4 3 if
OD ci
8.5 tsi is 6,211-z._.--.--.-rt.N.E---------,-4-r "-,,,-----,- '
ATLA
I r --
s-E..-Alr,
13-41 : . ..
7 : . . • .
A; . " ..+4.-:''.--.1' i-'4'..."•
1 *..
I..6...-4.4;.
REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE ---------
ROLL MAP CoMPANY, INC 1S OR FART FOR PERSONAL USE OR
gATTLE GI OW
PAVING
I
I. = 200 FT. ' COPYRIGHT KROU-" INCPANYCOMIMAP RESALE IS PROHIBITED BY LAW
COUNTY TAX LOT
BENNETT-MULTIVEST R-024-82
i..,.'2.,.:.i.-.,..:.:-.,-;.:::::,,,,t•i,,,•:. ,.,,,....-,..14:-......-....
s.,--:,•,,-•.•:"
r.ts..., 4..--#.---4.,• .-;.:r„.-...-...;.,4r.,...,.......„..;.:x.:..!..,5!,..4....,..„.„. -
t• ..-. -. .;.••-,.--";.,
ir---- ,',.:',,..--;-i .0-',,--••:-, •
I.-it\ ...,.:•••'!,
4....
s. .,•., ,.....
1,,-.,-.:''.,..-.--,;•_„.-rL-24..w,-.11;..t•-... .:.:-..--,---••i-P.1 ";:.••••.1,:.....:,=•:.,...„.....ii--77.-12.;_:•..*:-,:-.:-'....•-•' ..•,:-:'•. „.-
44:-.T-,-,:',.• -.
t.,,,:....',.z...,.. :...T.,
4, .•:,,,,,'...,...,-;. -.,.....7,-. c...-
z....,
0. ,..:.
T.''.:. :;
I;'..•,-.....•.,:-..7,:;t: •'',.,.., 1....",-,-,;:e.".:!,:....,:.;:.,:,;!:*-
r-.77.?„...,•'::::.0...,:'1:.:;.,.3ri-,r71.!'-''''*47,:::i...-p.
sis.: .
7.:,:::.....i:.. ..
4"'"
V ...k_.:3'-:;71'...-.--:-.''''•.L.;,:;:,E7‘- .1. ,•:-.:I_Ii."-..
4,z7,". .7".f,Y.Ii, ,W: f.t':d .iLIZ-.E.c.-.;.(,..,,r,;-...
4-;
175;'....:• i,-,..t.ti4i::•,::::..i,..1,:•
11.•,,,c04-..:::•*., -,...1...•......,•.;,•!
iz;:i,4
v•-i'.;,e ,T'et 7:-' <:::',4 , ..:,:;:•:-;,-,s:,:,,
z,. .;-,--;'•,:.-„ .
t ': %i'. .'747':'::'''
D; "' V t: ", '.1-'.'-. 11'•..-J''''''" '',;.,7,',.. - ':; ,, ...-..'.' '•• '-' '
1 00,6 f' ,
4,„$,---
1‘,.:7,•
I
1
i
I.- 1"'u'A .;Co 4aE`::77V. i i
F
1 I
Ifs.}JL _ T.r'I
I
r
ff-....
0, i
I -''.
Ili 1,
r;•••••"s", ••••••••...-.;......; •
e '.---:7.:...1.•
r7 .......
00ri
i
A
fr...'^.:•*
Ii
Cf
Tr,
91t01
ram. 'a ~/
Col y •-
r--
i
tJ
r
1 1 1 _
z• I
I
J f 7'
i
P
1
f1IIII
I f
3
f
12
4 I
I wt
c
1 11
1j
I 1
iI
I
1
I1I
Cr.) 11, I
II
1,
I
I y xs
Ij.3,-a1.^G.
1 1
t-.
y1'q 1- I
i 114• I
CITY OP REN ON i
liE: @ N 11 W-111. 01]-11 MAR 19 1982
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
WON M.,6•
to 667..'
I N'7
IiI
i
q
Ai• f 1t ` . I a -, .
Of
t
AyAi I.
Pi
r:..___.•ft l‘n-
i
r
y
fN\
tyl- \\\\.
j; - -
1 t7k-H
i1'
II- • •*. • ki----___-
1
t*' •
1 .....: 74
i , ,per _ - '- --- a.
a ,. -
t
i
a 1
Nf
KIt::....,,.. ir ..... .....10..._
1
7
ma44.
v. ..,,
il_ . •, , . . .
f.._._r_r: t_
iit0_,....:.::::::_,....73. ..__
177.4
A... . ' ' ' *
l';' L . .
7
c°
7---:
r
BENNETT-MULTIVEST R-024-82
u
9pL +4 SCHEMATIC- SITE PLAN o
a
iJ inc..t.I
rarer!'
y. .
Mv 11l
tst' t+bq•risktryo
Orr 4re .ItM en 4I04,
fit yip.
rt..,w.t/I,44 r1e1t *
UP Ale 14 see II
I arm ttM{
us
p
44004.DOUGL*s ML LVAAN Y/ sir . ' • • 1
Revision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: REZONE (R-024-82)
Location!:
Located on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE,
Applicant: Bennett - Multivest, et al
I1:Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
IjTraffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Darks Department
Building.Department
Police Department
Others: Policy, Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDEDINWRITING. ! P EASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00' P.M. ON
REVIEWING; DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:77 fJ L
1z-) Cf ar',12_, i I:
32
i
Appr ved Approved with Conditions Not Approved
x, ii. 1-9 (, ,
r• // /2e'ci;'.S,S c /`c> i-f i/.'el/ -,,,,
L)l F`^'f',f.
i , /!'' `
o. / /
o
Ve/4,/, ) ue‘ /G!//c/ iCf.•rr1
z^ .rR f r^ ac Qa/c r?crY 14:-c'e: ,s:c. -
rA - .,L,
I.-
1 '. 1 \o/ J/ cf (-
I /`,
14i.',3 7-1 e A i c__c,s/. -4,-2,-
CL-12-71-- ' ' ' 60N4 DATE: y`,
Signature Of Director or Authorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
v
l
Approved ErApproved with Condition Not Approved
DATE: V/z 7/FSignatureof; DiN ctor or Authorized Representat' e
I
1
Revision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: REZONE (R-024-82)
Location: Located on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant: Bennett - Multivest, et al
JQ ;Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
m1 Building Department
Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN.
WRIT_NG. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
REVI.LWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t C
0 Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
tl
e_ DATE:J-)Z
Signe of Director or uthorized Representative
I
REVI4NG DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved ®Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
DATE:
Signa'iure of Director or Authorized Representative
I Revision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNINGDEPARTMENTI
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: REZONE (R-024-82)
1
Location: Located on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a, point
945 feet ea t of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant: lennett - Multivest, et al
1
ID: Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
n Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
qJPoiice Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR
SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. P EASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 ', P.M. ON
REVIEWING PARTMENT/DIVISION: if
i
Appr ved ('pproved with Conditions Not Approved
A.-7/ r1 i`4-(-: (?-6-A i G/` .5- : D/G ' : . tomVV /-c-S4
A-/ -ff..-C' . . 7.--.). ... , .
i.. .. ..
f. . . . , ' ''..: . ':.....
s.:.....••. ... ": ..':
f..i
f I
DATE: LTl-•2,51
Signature of Di rector....or_.Au.thhOri zed epre ntative • . ..__
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT./DIVISION: , C)T/,Liry . 11/ "
Q
JAAE,A'.//V(-
Approved - [' pproved with Conditions ,' NotAPP roved;
5,.,. FZ . /.
1
DATE: -3A3v S Z
Signature of Dr for or Authorized Representative
I UTILITY APPROVAL 9UBIEGI lU (
3/00/82 A
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER Y&S uJ-;ado .' F.F
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER 0
I
SYSTEM DEKI6PAIENT CHARGE • WATER
I GOMM• , 4C-•
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER Go,AA&CT PN GWG
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER NO
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Af EA CHANGE • SEWER Ivp
APPROVED WATER PLAN Y$5 peo8AE3.Zf• kl evAi CT. ati
APPROVED SEV R PLAN YES
APPROVED•FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS.
BY FIRE DEPT. y 'S
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS 465
I i
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: REZONE (R-024-82)
I
Location: Ilocated on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet ,ea t of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant: ennett - Multivest, et al
Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
Traffic Eng. Division .
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
I
Building Department
Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. ; PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING D PARTMENT/DIVISION:
POLICE
Fl
Appr ved Approved with Conditions A Not Approved
Two way le turn' lane b nstalled by developer on N. th & o'n Union Ave. N.E.
lutside lighting be placed in such a way that it shines inward on the parking lots & bldgs.
o the light does not spill out on 'the surrounding roadways and does not blind people as they
irive into the lot at night.
onstructon hours be limited to between 7:00AM & 7:00 PM Monday thru Friday with no work allowed
n Saturdays orISundays due to the noise complaints a large development such as this will generat
if allowed to work on weekends.
All buildings be equiped with security doors, locks and burglar alarms.
Lt. D.
I,
R./,,% re'' DATE:3/31/82
Signature of Jirector or Authorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Appr ved ['Approved with Conditions Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
w •a I vI I J/ 1 7U I 1
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application ; REZONE (R-024-82)
Location:,
ocated on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet ieast of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant: Bennett - Multivest, et al
TO.: Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
Traffic Eng. Division I
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities Eng. Division
Uj Fire Department
1
Parks Department
I
Building Department
1
QPolice Department
v1;!,',Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. , P EASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING' DPARTMENT/DIVISION: / FOWLf !
Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved "WA /j 06eAl/
iti#57/hoe ittleij , 44-,04,1e ea,/,4,0tive_e_2%/
42 /1/. • . /1 e— :&oiwfreter/24"," 4 , 7.
DATE: e*e o ire r or Autnorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved Q Approved with Conditions Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
11t•I
Date circulated : 14: :::1 25, 1982 Comments uue : March 30, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEICKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 023 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPONENT : Bennett - Multivest, et al
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
1
1 G-1 & R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA: 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
I1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise : 1/
17 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north:
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
19) Natural resources : r/
10 ) Risk of upset : t/
11 ) Population/Employment : t/
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13) Trip ends CITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services :i/
15 ) Energy : L.,"/
16) Utilities :
1
17 ) Human health : t/
8) Aesthetics : c/
19 ) Recreation :
20) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS : . ,'
s O --lie -e- --.(,
c p J
3) s r/..
1`
t-tom-), .e_t: J-
S'" 4 '0 Sy -1 d'..1`.,--6-e--
Recommendation : DNSI,)( DOS
1J
re In ormation
Reviewed by : < Title :
Date : rz ?/ z--Y
FORM: ERC-06
Poet..__.
De.v. i
Date Ici culated : March 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 0 3 - 82 i
APPLI;CA ION No (s) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPONE T : Bennett - Multivest, et al
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief D scription of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1,&1R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE ,AREA : 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELIOP ENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
7
INFO '
1 ) To ographic changes :
2 ) Di ect/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Wa er & water courses :
4 ) P1 nt life : V ,
5 ) An- mal life :
6) No se : V
7 ) Liyht & glare :
8 ) La d Use ; north :) 01 /ff:*
east : 4 etVe4 G74W' ,fr
south :
14#0efellt
f,
west . 1 / W4411,
La d use conflicts :
OltVIwobstruction : ite / 0, /f;
Y9 ) Na ural resources :
10 ) 'Ri k of upset :
f
11 ) Poiulation/Employment :
12 ) Nu bor. of Dwellings : v
13 ) Tr p ends ( ITC ) : Aft
tr . ffic impacts : 4w is o/10.444 ,i—e ede....G2
14 ) Puolic services :
r
15 ) En rgy : V.'
16) Ut lities :
17) Hu an health :
18) Ae thetics :1,
19.) Re reation :
20 ) Ariheology/histolry :
COMMENT . : 9,4'i 0 G lG 1ptpee
S
id' 4 '4 p 6/ Q'd s
0(
1/
1- `(#
6,
9° 6:/4 Ily 404*
RecoMme dation : DNSt DOS Mor Information
Reviews• by Title : y"zoo,
I
Date : e j .
FORM:
ER9-
06
I
Date circulated : 25, 1982 Comments uue : March 30, 1982
ENIVIR0NMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 023 - 82
APPLICATION No (s) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPONENT : Bennett - Multivest, et al
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA : 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
12 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6 ) Noise :
7 ) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
t south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
3 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts : xx r
14) Public services : xxx
5 ) Energy :
6 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
8) Aesthetics :
1i9 ) Recreation :
0) Archeology/history :
II OMMENTS : Large shopping centers such as this have become a gathering place for youn,
people duling the late night & early morning hours. The gatherings result in litter, loud &
obscene iangauge, fights and the harassment of inncocent bypassers. I believe that the develol
ment should be made aware of the problem & required to development programs into there building
program to; discourage the gatherings before they start(i .e. lighting, signing of the area, possil
security guards, chain entrances(some) at night) . Traffic they should have to install a 2-way
left turn lane on both N.E. 4th & Union N.E. & have a sidewalk on the No. side of N.E. 4th from
ecommendation : DNSI DOS More Information xxxx
Union N.E ; to the East edge
2. he,'r"pr prty.
Reviewed by : G
i'
t ^"` Title :
2
Date :
IORM: ERC-06
TRAFFIC.
Date . ci culated : -`March 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
ENVIRW,411HENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF -i 0 3 - 82
APPLICA' ION No (s) . REZONE (R-024-82)
I
PROPO1NE T : Bennett - Multivest, et al
I
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief D scription of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
j i
G-1 & R- to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north; side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA : 8.5 acres ! BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :,
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO!
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Di ect/Indirect 'air quality :
3 ) Wa er & water courses : G "
4) P1 nt life :
5 ) An ' mal life :
6) Nose :
7 ) Li•ht & glare : 1 r
8 ) La d Use ; north :
east :
south :)
west :
La d use conflicts :
Vi -w obstruction :
9 ) Na ural resourceis :
10 ) Ri . k of upset :
11 ) Population/Emplolyment :
12 ) Nu ber of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE )
tr ffic impacts :, d r I c-
14 ) Pu lic services :, 1 `--
15) En r g y :
16 ) Ut lities :
17) Hu an health : i
118 ) Ae thetics :
19 ) Re reation: G'"
20 ) Ar heology/history :
COMMENT . :
0 72r ./ ' i y = ..•
r`.•
Recomme dation : DNSIi_ (/ DOS More Information
Revi we by : / ' Z'
Title : Ly`c zlz J%s
Date i/22..._./
FORM: ER -06
ritidth
Date circulated ; M=_-:,1 25, 1982 Comments 'uue March 30, 1982
ENVIRONMENOTAL CHECKCLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 023 - 82
APPLICATION No(s) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPONENT : Bennett - Multivest, et al
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA : 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7 ) ( Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
t south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
4 ) Public services :
5 ) Energy :
6) Utilities :
17 ) Human health :
18 ) Aesthetics :
19) Recreation :2/
1' 0 ) Archeology/history :
1OMMENTS :
T/ti.vl (IL/1.J1-1_c_. .n.<..-62.( /2 ct ,,, ".-/ N.( . :i --:.o Irlilt' cc i !.e, .Zt `"
ecommendation : DNSI DOS More Information_
J eviewed by : / 2:2 , -, / ->•..
2,.f .4'-a..-.T it1e : .A .)r i?." i y r'`-
I'
G
ate : .
r , ;`
ORM: ERC-06
1 utiu-N
ENcA.
Date ci culateth -==.ircl 25, 1982 Comment-5- due : March 30, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF _ 0 3 - 82 1
APPLICA
I
ION No (s ) . REZONE (R-024-82)
1
PROPONE T : Bennett - Multivest, et al
i
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief D scription of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the northiside of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AR A: 8.5 acres 'BUILDING AREA (gross)
I
DEVELOP ENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE ;
INFOI
1 ) Toiographic chanlges :, 1
2 ) Diect/Indirect air quality :V
3 ) ya er & water courses : f
4 ) P1 nt life : V
5 ) 'An mal life :
6) Noise : I x.,/
7) Liht &. glare : 1
l/
8) La d Use ; north:
east :
south:5
west :
Land use conflicts :
Vi w obstruction :
9) Na ural resources :
r
10 ) Ri k of upset :
11 ) Po ulation/Employment : V'
12 ) Nu ber of Dwellings :
13 ) . Tr p ends ( ITE ) : i.
traffic impacts :!
T.
14 ) Pau lic services :
15 ) tn rgy :
16 ) Ut lities :
i/
17 ) Hu an health : l
18 ) Ae thetics : V
19 ) Re reation :
1
20 ) Ariheology/history :
COMMENT :
Recomme dation : DN' ii DOS More Information
Reviewe• by : i/Title : UT71-r-y n(G/ 'Rt, ;
Date of 3/)/
FORM: ERC-06
Date circulated : N-._ "h 25, 1982 Comments .6a : March 30, 1982
ENUVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 023 - 82
APPLICATION No (s) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPONENT : Bennett - Multivest, et al
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA : 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :l
3 ) Water & water courses :
4) Plant life :
15 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare :
B) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts :
View obstruction :
9) Natural resources :
1/
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) Number of Dwellings :
3 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : v//
5 ) Energy :
V/:
6) Utilities :
II7 ) Human health :
o B) Aesthetics :
17/0 ) Recreation :
l' 0 ) Archeology/history :
I
OMMENTS :
ecommendation : Sr ,7 DOS More Information
eviewed by : . Iitle : -2 RS/ lc
bate : 3/2 7,)3
ORM: ERC-06
1 P..utL:4
ZoN ikc1.:
Date ci culated arcli 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 0' 3 - 82
APPLICA ION No (s) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPONE T : Bennett - Multivest, et al
1
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief D-scription of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & R-' to B-1 for .ro•osed communit sho. .in: center.
LOCATIIO : On the north j side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a ,point
1i 945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE ARIA: 8.5 acres 1 BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOP ENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO ,
1 ) To ographic changes :
2 ) ,Direct/Indirect air quality : V.
3) Water & water coiurses : K
4 ) Plnt life : r X1'
5 ) An mal life :
i'Y'
6) 'No se : t.„, 1
7) Li ht & glare :
8 ) La d Use ; north:;
east :
south :1 I
west :
La d use confli its :
Vi w obstruction;:
9) Na ural resource's : c '
10 ) Ri k of upset :X
11 ) Po ulation/Employment : 1( '
12 ) Nu ber of Dwelli1ngs :X
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE )
traffic impacts :Q_,e:=Id'ei CB'-
14) Pudic services :
15 ) En rgy : 1 x
16) Ut ' lities :
1
x
17) Hu' an health :
18) Ae. thetics : 1
19) Re' reation : 1
20 ) 'Ar heology/histlry :
COMMENT :
1
1
1I
Recomme lotion : DNSI_ DOS More forma, -on
Reviewed by : ,0fi/ s/ .Title : ..
tPL
i J1
Date a
7r .
FORM: ER -06
II,....... \7-`X.:17.-9-.H ..•T f..1.'g..-A 8 ir":67V 1 fr-'",.^."4 446.
1-) e."•••.
7.4.,1 '
1....:3
0.
f. 7.0.e...
141..4
WI.''If. C.,•.'`Z P.
I,
Y ,
1
11:. —- 7 - ------ . . -F
i 1.4.:•
1 ' ' i
e
i l 4 t
c.,-......... ... t...,...-..:;...) , --
rwr
1
I • : .
7'' ,
r_
r•46,-,--7.'"
r,.: ' •-..
a:.:s , ,
i I <1 tf I : (
ZIA'?--„.
1";.-0:
1. y,
1 44.
1 •. .•
16. 1..1re-n.4•J •
i s 0 0. . •
i • 1
I
I
F-„I I ..,,,,r
i.
5.....`""...te_ I •
1..d t t"' rye
7-----
II_ - 1 1 f ig 4rerret....i I .
1
I I 1I rt_., 1 c..r...._;.--
I . 1 .I 12It .
4------"1-'
i
1 II ' •• tri4
tv 4 -7. -
7r.
v., --
f,
i
1 • 1 •, .. ,,( ,
zi 1 li • ', •I 1
i
4•7.-..-•_...--.,-,,,.. . .
r.-J.-... •-.
4'
oNt I p i.e..P;... i •
1•-:-'•,•-•,.._a-- .-2_.:
1 en,
2 21.
I (••••+." , ...
mn
i •. _.It • 1cx -7-411.r. ! P
rlt
i
1 .....i....:..., , 1
fi.
1---E-r--
t
1
H
Z. 54-111- II.
t I I I
9." air.X
I I t
1
1 I
I I
I
I i-k
IL!.
1iI111II
1
11. 7214,•151V4,
101 . 1.t.-
4...--'•.:-_-.
T.
rr°,•;'; T'"'41 I"
T•;
I
I I 1; •-1---
II f
f 1
E.] __. . _ •7.,,-- i 1 PI.-.••1...)..... 1"."1.t-...5......-ZW1. 1 .-
I I
I 14,..,..1 :.i
P .•.,.
J V tt. .
I
nIPPEIVEA • I 1 , _B
el —---
MAR 1 9 1982 '
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.•
r„,:ltii.,7 314,
7.
h ____--- --11-----7-1-
1 1
i
top,.1
i .
1 .
1,• ,_ ;` Z4 .--.-. 1 --___----- I IV, -
a =js 1
a a
r
O `_11. 3o1. IieivT ]
J t
i 134 44;4 •
a TT—
I...+- -_— 1_ kr k r'
1 t• .1 1.:'`.‘ ' .
111\
lb I
VI
1 ' R-
4
1
a"V .
Aiel "1
1
k ',%. 11,2. 1
1 I
1
k!,
I
J .
1 1
I
N
I
GI-1 j '
i •
h4
1
I
1
BENNETT-MULTIVEST , ET AL . 1
I R-024-82
I
I I
1
APPLICANT Bennett-Multivest , et al . TOTAL AREA 8 . 5 acres
1 1
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via; N . E . 4th Street
EXISTING ZONING G- 1 , R-3
EXISTING USE Vacant and Single Family
PROPOSED USE Community Shopping Center
1
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE ; PLAN Commercial
I
COMMENTS
1
1 1
1
I
r 7^a
I
Dateicirculated :March 25, 1982 Comments due :March 30, 1982
ENVIROINMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF -1I 023- 82
APPLI ATION No (s ) . Rezone (R-024-82)
PROPOIENT : BENNETT-MULTIVEST, et al
PROJE' T TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property
currenlllly G-1 & R-.3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATIION : On the north side of N. E. 4th Street between Union Avenue
N. E.
and a point 945 feet east of Union Avenue N. E.SITE REA : R_ S avrPs BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVEL oPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :X
2 ) D'' rect/Indirect air quality : X
3 ) Water & water courses : X
4 ) Piant life : X
5 ) Alimal life :X
6 ) Nloise : X
7) Lllght & glare : X '
8 ) Llind Use ; north : Multi-family
east :
Undeveloped and single family ,
south :
Undeveloped and single family
west :
Commercial and undeveloped
L nd use conflicts : Multi-Family to north
V ' ew obstruction : Probable but minor.
9 ) N . tural resources :
X
10 ) Ri _ k of upset :.
X
11 ) Po'oulation/Employment :
X
12 ) Nulber of Dwellings : X
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 8, 000+
tr1ffic impacts :
More analysis of demand needs to be made.
14) P4lic services : 1 X
4
r15) Engy :
X
16) Ut lities:
X
17 ) Hu 'an health :
X
18) Ae:lthetica :
X
19) Re • reation:
X '
20) Ar•heolo gy/history . X
COMMENT ' :
Signatur-
1 r7, 6„,,,,,L .4,,,,.,,_____
Donald G. INelson
David R. ClemensBuilding4)fficial
Policy Development Director
iC
R' ' and Ci' Hcmc fn„
FINAL DECLARATION OF SIG IFIE1
Application No (s) : , R-024-82
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-023-82
Description of Proposal:
Application for rezoning
property currently
G-1 and R-3 to B-1
for proposed community
shopping center.
Proponent:
BENNETT-MULTIVEST, ET AL
Locatipn of Proposal:On the north side
of N. E. 4th Street
between Union Avenue
N.E. and a point
945 feet east of
Union Avenue N.E.
Lead Agency: City of Renton Building
Zoning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 31 , 1982,
and April 7, 1982, following a presentation by JerryLindoftheBuilding & Zoning Department. Oral comments were
accept id from: Gary Norris, Robert Bergstrom, Roger Blaylock,
Richard Houghton, James Gray, Donald Persson, David Clemens,
Ronc.ld Nelson and Jerry Lind.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-023-82 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared, by:
Michael L. Smith DATED: March 19, 1982
2) Applications : R-024-82
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Building & Zoning D epartment, Fire Department, Parks
Recreation Department, Utility Engineering Division,
T affic Engineering Division.
More information: Policy Development Department and
P lice Department.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this, d velopment has a non-significant adverse impact on
the en ironment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) .
This d cision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on fil with the lead agency.
Reason for declaration of environmental non-significance:
Will' n t adversely affect the environment and adjacent properties .
Signatures :
7
7, ./:-'/b-/-*/,--)-7, (---------- Ofle
onald G. Nelson avid R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
n
Ri and C. Houghton
Public orks Director
DATE OF PUBLICATION: April 12, 1982
Revision 3/1981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application_: REZONE (R-024-82)
Location: Located on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet, east of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant: Bennett - Multivest, et al
TQ: Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
2 Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
WBuilding Department
Et] Police Department
1
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTSIOR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. ; PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P.M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI,SION: 78C,
Approved ® Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
r., e— DATE: 97—A- i)e_
Signa e of lirector or uthorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved ®Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
I 1
I
DATE:
Signature of D rector or Authorized Representative
Revision :i/ I981
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: REZONE (R-024-82)
Location:
Located on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant: Bennett - Multivest, et al
TQ :i Public Works Department
jEngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
l_jTraffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
D Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS •
R SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDEDINWRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved / 'Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
l.ID / rrn // F/L C-es'isw /-(f 1
r'
j.f/(F P r'` e, t,
l , C/%
t /' ls s'F_ G7 Aci jlstJl D
q//
l
7 L}
r/ l ti',/ L'`1w r ".'C G c' ' '(
c l .'
9 ' '
r
a':ICJ:.,t=
A =5.`3
J!/
J(
e /
4 !7 / c c?`l, e, I C.p S
c r Y V Q lL 1C n. L f _ 1,.\'E. l /
DATE: dwSignature; of Director or Authorized Representative '
REVIEWING: DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
App oved E> rApproved with Conditions El Not Approved
rt.-
r
e
IF- DATE: VA 7/
Signature of Director or Authorized Representae
r'Cv ra rurr 3/ i' o
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: REZONE (R-024-82)
Location:
Located on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant 1
Bennett - Multivest, et al
IQ:Public Works' Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities Eng. Division
Fire Department
Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
0 Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS 0' SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. LEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: POLICE
fl1Approved ( Approved with Conditions Not Approved
1) Two way le turn lane be—Installed by developer on N.E Vth & o Union Ave. N.E.
Outside lighting be placed in such a way that it shines inward on the parking lots & bldgs.
so the light does not spill out on the surrounding roadways and does not blind people as they
drive into the 1 t at night.
3) Constructon hour be limited to 'between 7:00AM & 7:00 PM Monday thru Friday with no work allowed
on Saturdays or undays due to the noise complaints a large development such as this will generat
if allowed to wok on weekends.
0 All building be eguiped with security doors, locks and burglar alarms.
Lt. Dt 1j e,
DATE:3/31/82
Signature. of Director or Authorized Representative
REVIEWING' DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
DAppoved ['Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
nev ,blUn J/ IyoI
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Applica,ti n: REZONE (R-024-82)
Location:
Located on the 'north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant Bennett - Multivest, et al
JQ ;Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
1 Utilities Eng. Division
gj Fire Department
El Parks Department
Building Department
Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS OP' SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. 'LEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON
REVIEWING EPARTMENT/DIVISION: q-7
7
DAp roved approved with Conditions 0 Not Approved
i2Sl f i O r f"
v z
DATE:
Signature' of Director...or_.Au.thor..i zed. Repre .:ntati ve
REVIEWING D PARTENT/DIVISION:M tr',L ry
App oved approved=with Conditions E`Not Approved
5„tS,a
DATE: 3/30181
Signature of Qir for or Authorized Representative
II
UTILITY APPROVAL SUMO ID 0
3/3Of$;Z A
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER NeyEs u-'-Ado 3 .F
LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER NO
SYSTEM DtVcL PMENT CHARGE • WATER
I Gomm. 14c
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEVIER Gon/A/ GrlON GA/Fr.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER No
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA GUaRGE • SE ''ER A fp
APPROVED WATER PLAN y,E5 ,p,ealAs,Lo mA/xJ% -rams/6v4/
APPROVED SEWER PLAN Y .s
APPROVED-FIRE -HYDRANT LOCATIONS •
BY FIRE DEPT. yE5
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS y,ES
Revision .s/ Iyt3I
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
Application: REZONE (R-024-82)
Location:
Located on the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
Applicant Bennett - Multivest, et al
IG:Public Works Department
Engineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 3-31-82
Traffic Eng. Division
SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
Utilities, Eng. Division
Fire Department
Darks Department
Building Department
Police Department
Others: Policy Development
COMMENTS O' SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING.; PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON
J / AmelREVIEWINGDEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /l /
E!
Pp roved ® Approved with Conditions Lp= 'yot Approved ,9W 4/44wc `./
15/hie 56 /6 4,67,4ft C140./Aeldc,
ue• l 4P- 411/11'4/le • 7
DATE: e / ®G,
Si a e o iea„,,, , 4„
Authorized Representative
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
Approved El Approved with Conditions ® Not Approved
DATE:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
1 Zul t D4
V.
1 ZoMI6461,
Date irculatea : elajrch 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
ENVIROINIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVVIEW SHEET
ECFI - 023 - 82
APPILI ATION No (s) . I REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPO ENT : Bennett Multivest, et al
PROJE T TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA : 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : I
1
1 ii
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
j a
INFIO
1 ) Topographic changes :1
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3 ) Water & water courses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) A-iimal life : 1 X
6) Noise :
1',
c:
7) Light & glare :
8 ) Land Use ; north:
east :I
south':
west :I
L nd use conflicts :
V ew obstruction :
9) N tural resourcies : c
10 ) R sk of upset : 1
11 ) P pulation/Emplpyment :
12 ) N mber of Dwellings :X
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) :'
traffic impacts':
14 ) Public services:
15 ) Energy :
16) Utilities : I X
17) Human health: I
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation :
20 ) Archeology/history :
COMMENTS :
I I
I
Recomme dation : DNSI_ DOS More nforma on
Reviewed by : `// ,•/ Title :
Date 1Z
I
FORM: ERG-06
eNci,
Date circulateu . Kal,rch 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 023 - 82
APPILI ATION No (s ) . ' REZONE (R-024-82)
I
PROPONENT : Bennett -jMultivest, et al
PROJECT TITLE :
Brief Description or Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1I & R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and la point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA: 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
I
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) D ' rect/Indirect air quality :V
3) W. ter & water courses :
4) Plant life :
5 ) A imal life :
6) Noise :
7) L ' ght & glare : l/
8 ) L .nd Use ; northl:
east :
south':
west :,
L - nd use conflilcts :
V ew
obstFuctiol :
9) N- tural resources :
10 ) R ' sk of upset :
11 ) ' Population/Employment : V
12 ) N mber of 'Dwellings :
13 ) T ip ends ( ITE )
traffic impacts :
14 ) Public services : 1 1/
15 ) Energy : j ,
16) Utilities : l/
17 ) Hu an health : F
L/
18) Aesthetics : 1/
19 ) Re reation :
20 ) Ar heology/history :
COMMENT. :
I
I
J
i
Recomlme dation : DN • DOS More Information
Reviewe by : I Title : UT7Ln-y 1JG84,
Date 34)
FORM: ERC-06
I
f 11k/
1
r
1
r
Date irculated:- Aarch 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF! - 023 - 82
APPLI ATION No (s) . i REZONE (R-024-82)
I I
PROPO ENT : Bennett Multivest, et al
PROJE T TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & •-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and ,a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE ' REA : 8.5 acre BUILDING AREA (gross )
I
DEVELIPMENTAL COVERAGE (90) :
1
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO_
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3) ater & water courses :
4:) Plant life :
5 ) Animal life :
6) Noise :
7); , Light & glare :
1
8 ) Land Use ; north :
I
east ;
south :
west :
Land use 'conflicts :
View obstruction :
1/
9) N- tural resources :
h/
10 ) R ' sk of upset : ,
9/
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) N mber of Dwellings :
13) T ip ends ( ITE )' :
At affic impacts :
14) P blic services : 1
15 ) E ergy :
7
16
16 ) U ilities :
17 ) H man health : I .i/- 1
18) A- sthetics :
19 ) R creation :
20 ) A cheology/history :
COMMEN S :
r
1
1
I
Recomm ndation : SII DOS More Information
Revilew d by : Title ::j Zr2sTh-f4
Dat®I: 3/25- e
I
FORM:; E C-06 1
1
1
TRAFFIC.
EMGI, ,
Date irculatea : March 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
i
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SWEET
ECF'! - 023 - 82
1 1
APPLIIATION No (s ) . !REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPO ENT : Bennett - IMultivest, et al
I
PROJEST TITLE : I
1
1
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & °-3 to B-1 for .ro.osed communit sho. .in: center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE. 1
SITE AREA : 8.5 acres' BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELO•MENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
a
INFO
1 ) T .pographic changes :
2 ) D: rect/Indirect air quality :
v
3)_ ! W. ter & water courses :
4) P ant life :
5 ) A imal life : I
6) 1 Noise : I
7 ) L ' ght & glare : I
8) L . nd Use ; north[:
east :;
south :
west :,
L . nd use conflilcts :
V ew obstruction :
9) N- tural resources : 4.----
10 ) 1 R ' sk of upset : 1
11 ) P.pulation/Employment : i..----
12 ) N mber of Dwellings :
13) T ip ends ( ITE ) : o) q "
traffic impacts [: 1'110 d ev-a-tF_ 1 -PG'' 'r
14 ) Public services 1
15 ) Energy :
r
16 ) Utilities : I G -
17 ) Human[ health :
18) Aesthetics :
19 ) Recreation : 1
20 )
IArI
heology/history :
COMMENTS :
1j 0 ??..`v!y'/.,/'P c,/,.?S/i i-? c'.s--,_ ter. /;„,_, / 1e.1a G_Je
1/
j4-44 /
Z-,- e
a ei N`E"e4 -6 s
0! .....„
1,-,
it/ A-, i "-- (
i_'_-`1 '' %'7 , .;Pe-,N.f.+` 6%' C. ti.., _- 7 ,r >
I/
Recomme,/IIidation : DNSI1_ / DOS More Information
Reviewed by :
r
Z' Title : /y` Xr c . L57,''
Date i
1/
i/eZ_,1
I .
FORM: ERC-06
1
l
i i
pp u
Date irculated i 'March 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 023 - 82
APPLI ATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPO ENT : Bennett - iMultivest, et al
PROJEIT TITLE :
1
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & °-3 to B-1 for •ro.osed communit sho. .in. center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE. •
SITE
AREA : 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELO•MENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) D; rect/Indirect air quality :
3) W. ter & water e,ourses :
4 ) Plant life :
5 ) i A imal life :
6) Noise :
7) Light & glare : I
8) 1I L . nd Use ; north:
east :
south':
west :
L - nd use conflicts :
V ew obstruction :
9) N. tural resources :
10 ) Risk of upset :
11 ) P pulation/Empliyment :
12 ) N mber of Dwellings :
13 ) T ip ends ( ITE ) ':
t affic impacts;:
14 ) P blic serviced:
15 ) E ergy :
16) Utilities : j
17 ) Human health : •
18 ) Aesthetics :
19 ) 1 Recreation :
20 ) lArcheology/history :
COMMENTS :
I
JYr ..c.c-C' /Lcs,c,4 c_ z apt c r r4 c G v - ` ,
cr.s.<<=-
A - -Q. '
Recomme dation : DNSI DOS More Information
Revi wed by : / D>,,br Ur
c .,T it1e : ,, X 19-c -1-e) ec
Date z.r -l 6, • t2
f
FORM: ER '-06
P
Date irculated : March 25, 1982
Comments due : March 30, 1982
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 023 - 82
APP'LIIATION No (s) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROPO ENT : Bennett - Multivest, et al
PROJEIT TITLE :
I
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
h
G-11& •-3 to B-1 for Proposed communit sho. .in_ center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA : 8.5 acre BUILDING AREA (gross)
t
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) :
1 1
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :17 ,
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :V
3 ) W: ter & water courses :
4 ) P ant life :1 V -
5 ) A imal life : 1et
6) Noise : I lls
7
7) L ght & glare : ;
4174e/8 ) L :nd Use ; northl,:
east : 4 dele alli '5
south : 1 e
tp /,,
west :I 14#0e/e/A1 G.,ifl lL a/
L - nd use confliicts : , 2 d
View obstructioh :4i40!f
4
9) Natural resources :
10 ) R • sk of upset : I 1,- ,
11 ) P pulation/Employment : V
12 ) N mber of Dwellings :
13 ) T ip ends ( ITE ) : MO
414 .
t affic impacts: I7" C tQ % s 9 11jz(ce406
14 ) P blic
servicesI
Iiv 1
15 ) Energy :
16 ) Utilities :
17 ) Human health : r
y
18) Aesthetics :
I
19 ) , Recreation : V
v
20) Archeology/histdry :
COMMENTS : A0( 4‘ba 4g0 01 ,1401,X2PW45 ,0f"
S
4,e, y6 Avai 4 yke-,cle g,Pai,o?.(
e) ems 6
i
triRecolilmedation ://DNSI Ai, DOS Mor Information
I
Reviewed by f/1f i '
Apr ,, _.../
Title : iy,
1
Date : e
1
FORM: IER -06
I
I i
Date irculated : March 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
1 EINVIROING1EP TAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
I
ECF - 023 - 82 1
APPLISATION No (s) . ,REZONE (R-024-82)
1
PROPO ENT : Bennett - Multivest, et al
PROJEST TITLE :
I 1 I
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1 & -3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCAI TION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE AREA: 8.5 acre BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
1
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) T • pographic changes :
2 ) DYrect/Indirect air quality :
3 ) I W. ter & water courses :
4) P ant life :
1
5 ) A imal life :
1
6 ) N ise :
7) L ght & glare : Il
1
8 ) IL nd Use ; north :
east :'
1
southi:
west :1
L nd use conflicts :
itural
iew obstructio' :
9) resources :
10 ) R ' sk of upset :
11 ) Population/Employment :
12 ) N mber of Dwellings :
13 ) ii T ip ends ( ITE )
I
t affic impacts xx
14 ) Public services : I. xxx
15 ) Energy :
16) iUtilities: 1
17 ) Human health :
18) 1Aesthetics :
19 ) 1Recreation :
20 ) "Archeology/history :
COMMENTS : Large shopping centers such as this have become a gathering place`for young
people during the late night & early morning hours. The gatherings result in litter, loud &
obscene langaulge, fights and the harassment of inncocent bypassers. I believe that the develop-
ment should be 'mad aware of the problem & required to development programs into there building
program to discbur ge the gatherings before they start(i .e. lighting, signing of the area, possibl
security guards, hain entrances(some) .at night) . Traffic they should have to install a 2-way
left turn lane on both N.E. 4th & Union N.E. & have a sidewalk on the No. side of N.E. 4th from
Recomme1dation : DNSIL : DOS More Information xxxx
Union N.E. to the ast edge o he' ` p rty.
Reviewed b y :
t.-j----- tst l e :
Dated 3- 3/- 8
I
I
FORM: ER -06
1
y
lzDe.sicim
Date circulates March 25, 1982 Comments due : March 30, 1982
ENVIR0NMENITAL' CHECKLIST REVIECI SHEET
ECF' - 023 - 82
APPILIt ATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-024-82)
PROr0 ENT : Bennett - Muitivest, et al
I
PROJE T TITLE :
Brief Description of Project : Application for rezoning property currently
G-1', & R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center.
LOCATION : On the north side of NE 4th Street between Union Avenue NE and ,a point
945 feet east of Union Avenue NE.
SITE REA : 8.5 acres BUILDING AREA (gross)
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality :
3 ) Water & water courses :
4) P ant life : L
5 ) A imal life :
6) N ise :
7) L ' ght & glare : c/
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
L. nd use conflicts :
V ew obstructio1n :
9 ) N tural resources :
T
r/
10 ) R sk of upset : e/
11 ) P pulation/Employment :
12 ) iN mber of Dwellings :
13 ) T ip ends ( ITE ) :
t affic impacts :
14 ) Plblic services:
15 ) ,, E e r g y : c/
7
16 )
I
U ilities : V
17 ) H man health :
18) A=sthetics :
19) 1R.creation : j
20 ) ; A cheology/history :
COMMEN S : '2 7-17,3 6re - -- ( r'-
3) s ,-,-->7 s ,-22,.,-2-
y, sf}TARY
u.1 EOn'
G
ice"
Recommendation : DNSI DOS re In ormation
Review=d by : 0-,-..- Title :
1
Date : q'/2 /<F-j
i
I
FORM: ER -06
I
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC, HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING
EXAMINE AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
CITY HAIJL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON June 29, 1982, AT 9: 00
A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
G. M. ASSOCIATES
Application to rezone 17 . 3 acres of property' from G-1
to B-1 for a community shopping center, file R-019-82;
property located on the east side of Duvall Avenue N.E.
between N.E. 4th Street and S.E. 121st Street.
bNNerTIA MIRLAMMEZA, ET AL
1457- =ic TUI5 neo 'ng property currently G-1 and
R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping center, file
R-024-82; located on the north side of N.E. 4th Street
be ween Union Avenue N.E. and a point 945 feet east
of Union Avenue N.E.
Legal; d-scriptions ofthe files noted above are on file in
the Ren on Building and Zoning Department.
ALL INTDRESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE
PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 29, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M.
TO• EXPRDSS THEIR OPINIONS.
PUBLISHDD: June 18, 1982 RONALD G. NELSON
BUILDING AND ZONING
DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I, STEV MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE
ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE 1:ROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to
before e, a Notary Public, in
and for the State of Washington
residin in King County, on the
I
da171
of June, 1982.
7 Cs.1t, SIGNED: . _j
3
i jf
Y
Gii1'.W1S^klibxS:a+km+.+3;RS'xiPJ'acM• aa....>.Rn.,.:,..,L:wi..'.w.::..-...» > U1.4`.
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
1
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final
declaration of non-significance for the following projects :
McDONALD' S 'CORPORATION (ECF-029-82)
Application to rebuild an existing McDonald' s Restaurant
with a new building similar in style to other McDonald' s
Restaurants in the community, file B-274 ; located
at 73 Rainier Avenue South.
BENNETT-MULITIVEST, ET AL (ECF-022-82)
Application for rezoning property currently G-1
and R-3 to B-1 for proposed community shopping
center, file R-024-82; located on the north side
of N.E. 4th Street between Union Avenue N.E. and
a point 945 feet east of Union Avenue N.E.
I
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final
declaration of non-significance subject to conditions for
the following projects :
VENTURA PARTNERSHIPS (ECF-034-82)
Application for construction of apartment complex
of 240 multi-family units; located north of N.E.
4th Street between Union Avenue N. E. and Monroe
Avenue N.E.'
DENNIS K. SMART (ECF-019-82)
Application for one steel frame building to house
multiple automotive maintenance businesses, file
B-273 ; located at 3100 block of N.E. 4th Street.
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final
declaration of significance for the following project :
LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES (STEVE HARER) (ECF-095-81 )
Application for rezone from T to R-3, maximum of
15 units per acre, to allow future development
of condominiums or adult apartments, file R-090-81 ;
property located in the vicinity of 21 Lake Washington
Blvd. N.
Further information regarding this action is available in
the Bui ding and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton,
Washing on, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed
with the Hearing Examiner by April 26, 1982.
Publish d: April 12 , 1982
1
I
A b
FINAL D ?'CLA RATIOM OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (s) :; R-024-82
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-023-82
Desci-iption of Proposal : Application for rezoning
property currently
G-1 and R-3 to B-1
for proposed community
shopping center.
Prop ,nent: BENNETT-MULTIVEST, ET AL
Location of Proposal : On the north side
of N.E. 4th Street
between Union Avenue
N.E. and a point
945 feet east of
Union Avenue N.E.
Lead Agency: City of Renton Building
Zoning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on March 31 , 1982,
and April 7, 1982, !following a presentation by Jerry Lind
of ;th Building & Zoning Department. Oral comments were
accepted from: Gary Norris , Robert Bergstrom, Roger Blaylock,
Richard Houghton, James Gray, Donald Persson, David Clemens,
Ronald Nelson and Jerry Lind,
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of th ERC on application ECF-023-82 are the following:
1 nvironmentalionmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
Michael L. Smith DATED: March 19, 1982
2) Applications : R-024-82
3) Recommendation's for a declaration of non-significance:
Building & Zoning D epartment, Fire Department, Parks
Recreation Department, Utility Engineering Division,
raffic Engineering Division.
ore information: Policy Development Department and
Police Department.
Actin as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this evelopment has a non-significant adverse impact on
these vironment. An! EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on fi e with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
Will not adversely affect the environment and adjacent properties.
Signatures :
7
47-1) 07(0-&-- a/
Ronald G. Nelson ! avid R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
v
Riefiara C. Houghton .
Public Works Director
DATE; OF PUBLICATION:
1
April 12 , 1982
EXPIRRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: April 26 , 1982
I j
Date circulated : - - c;h 25, 1982 Comments due :March 30, 1982
ENVIRONi1ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEV SHEET
ECF 023- 82
I
APPLICATION No (s ) . Rezone (R-024-82)
I
PROPONENT : BENNETT-MULTIVEST, et al
PROJECT TITLE : 1
Brief" Description ofProject : Application for rezoning property
currently G-1 & R-3 to B-1
for ,•proposed community shopping center.1 I
LOCATION : On the north side of N. E.
4th Street between Union Avenue
N. E. and a point 945feetSITEARA . east of Union Avenue N. E.R_ s avrPs i BUILDING AREA (gross )
DEVELOP ENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
f
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes :X
402 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : X
3 ) feat r 6 water courses :X
4 )
Pla t life :
X
a
4`
5 ) Ani al life :X
6) Noi e : X
7 ) Light & glare : X
of8 ) Lan Use ; north: Multi-family
east :
Undeveloped and single family
south: Undeveloped and single family 1
west : Commercial and undeveloped
15Lanuseconflicts : Multi-Family to north
View obstruction : Probable but minor.
9 ) Natural resources
X
10 ) Risk of upset :
X
X
11 ) Popu ation/Employment :
12 ) Numb - r of Dwellings :I X I
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : I- 8,000+
traf ic impacts : More
analysis of demand needs to be made.
14 ) Publ . c services : 1 X
i15)
Enl rgy :
X
16) Utilities:
X '
17) Human health :
X
18 ) Ae3thetica : X4
19) Rere .tion:
X
20) Arlhe• logy/history : X
COMMENTS :
Signatures :
P///I./.
I - . '-<4!2?7L-- 1 4,;/// ie.e(donaldG. N lson 1
David R. ClemensBuilding
11
Of icial
Policy Development Director
4,f-eL,C ./7-1.4.,,,t2A.5-
R' ,'hard C 1 Hloug ton,
nhP1 i.. r,.-...t- . ---- •
r..
Ill
I,
1i;
1;1
I
AF EWAY STORES, INCORPORATED
I i
P.O.Box 947,Bellevue,Washington 98009(1121 124th Avenue N.E.98005)
pi OF RENTON
M Y 2 61982
1
POLICY
1I May 11, 1982
DEV LOPMENT DEPT.
1 .._ g 1E d iii[-EIMr. Michael Smith ,
Bel erra Development Corporation MAY 1 3 1982
174J2 108th Avenue S.E. , Suite 200
Renton, Washington 98055
BELTERRASubect: Proposed tore 553
I N.E. Fourth Street and Union Avenue Northeast
I Renton, Washington
1
De Mr. Smith: 1
1
You equested a resplonse from Safeway regarding our market research
for he shopping cneter site at N.E. Fourth Street and Union Avenue
Nort east in Renton.' We have studied a number of statistical elements
whic , combined withithe physical characteristics of the property,
s`gg st it is an appropriate shopping center site for one of our stores.
I
We h ve studied population, households, and future growth potential
of the area through data prepared by Puget Sound Council of Governments,
King County, and theiCity of Renton. The market area of the proposed
site extends in a funnel shaped manner, increasing in width (north-south)
as it progresses eastward from FAI-405 along N.E. Fourth Street. The
maximum northward extension of the market area is Sunset Boulevard N.E.
and the maximum southward extension is the north bluff above the Cedar
Rive and Maple Valleliy Highway. The market area extends eastward to
appr ximately the Lake McDonald vicinity due to the lack of any significant
exis ing or planned shopping facilities in this area of the county. The
cens s tracts involved in this area are the southerly portions of 254 and
251,5, 256, 251 and 3191. The corresponding population statistics are readily
avai able at the Cityllof Renton Planning Department and the Puget Sound
Coun it of Governments.
ItlIIis clear when reviewing the existing population and future growth
proje tions, combinedjwith the general lack of suitable or planned
coinme cial areas further east in the county, that the subject site and
area Molds tremendous 'iopportunity for a successful Safeway store in
combination with other retail and service oriented commercial uses. It
is,particularly important to be located at a site that has potential
for commercial expansion to provide a healthy, viable, full service
community commercial center that will adequately attract the consumers
and, lore importantly,'I satisfy their needs.
I
lig you want from a store (S) and a little bit more
Mr. Michael Smith Page Two May 11, 1982
I
We have reviewed various sites in and around the City of Renton and
fee quite strongly that the subject site is most strategically located
in dynamic and growing,market area. We have reviewed approximately
Ole en, recently coestructed, or planned residential developments in the
wic nity of the site, which will. consist of a possible maximum of 2844
uni s. These do not include any planned county projects, and is, further
evi ence of the desirability of the area for close in convenient living.,
Se way and other commercial uses, being service oriented, must anticipate
suc growth trends to provide locational convenience and a broad range ,of hoice and service. We like to consider ourselves one of the leaders:
in stablishing such community commercial areas.
I
We lso have a store in the ,Renton Highlands area. We feel that this new
sotre will not have1a detrimental affect on the existing store and the
Sunset Boulevard commercial. corridor. This is because that market areal
is oriented primarily west, north and east along the Sunset Boulevard
corridor, which in itself Comprises a separate and independent market area.
We ;lope we have answered your questions regarding our research and
interpretation of the market area. We would not be investing such time
and money in the site if we didn't believe it to be an excellent location
and market.
Sincerely,
Greg Bever
Realty Representative
I
GB:11
Cc: File
C I.TY OF RENTON
s
RF7O'IE APPLICATION CITY OF RENTON-:
40R OFFICE USE ONLY DEC 11 U
LAND USE REARINGD
PPLI CATION 'lINO
fI
EXAMINER 'S ACTIO, MAR 191982
PPLICATION IFEE $ 42,,7 APPEAL FILED
ECEIPT. NO. ry-
1
c
1?—
CITY COUNCIL ACTIDNbILDING/ZONING DEPT.
ILING DATE ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE
SEARING DATE
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 :
I
Name Bennett -. Mul.tivest, et al Phone 255-9448
Address 17422 108th Ave. , TE, Suite 200, Renton, WA. 98055
3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on
the north side of NE 4th 'St.
between_ Union Avenue NE
and
A point approx. 945 feet east of Union Ave.NE
1 . Square footage or acreage of property
8.5± acres
3 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a
separate sheet)
See attached
1
i
3 .: FxistingZo inq G, general; R-3
residentiMninq Requested B-1, business
4OTE TO APPLICA T: The following factors are considered in reclassifying • .
property.; Evidence or additional information to substantiate
your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application
Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form
in duplicate.
7 . Proposed us of Site Community shopping center (see attached for additional information)
The subject rezone site (8.5t- acres) is a portion of a larger site (12.8 acres) which
together will be developed in a planned shopping center use. 4.29 acres of the total
development isite is already zoned B-1.
3. List the me sures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area.
The proposed 4onin is compatible with existingzoning, land uses, and thecomprehensivegP
plan for to area. Resultingplanned commerical development has positive benefits and '
1
will
comply with city standards designed to help mitigate impacts (see attachments for
1
3 . How soon after the rezone isgranted do
further
the site?
n) .
you intend to develop site
see attached,
1
0 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required.
Planning Dept:
1-77
N
r// - ,
t..- ,-)
CITYof1 !
S
NTTiv
t h 11 "7 IF
gATTACHMENTMA ,
i9 /982
REZONE G & R-3 TO B-1 viVING urPT.
BENNETT - MULTIVEST, ET AL
ADDITIONAL JUSTIFICATION
A. Additional Responses to Rezone Application Form
7, 71he subject site will be transformed from its present relatively under--
developed state (only a few scattered older homes now exist on the
site) to a planned commercial center.
The initial phase will consist of a supermarket - hardware - drug
Store as the major anchor uses combined with a variety of retail
shops and services. Subsequent phase or phases will contain additional
retail shops and service oriented uses as additions to the planned
center.
A conceptual site plan has been submitted with this application to
help visualize in, a general sense the proposed uses and progression of-
dlevelopment. As indicated the planned center will also consist of
integrated and compatible architectural building treatment, planned
4cess points to pity standards, suitable parking, signing, and
landscaping.
8. The proposed rezone and development is consistent with the compre-
hnsive land use plan and policies element which designates the site
fQr commercial use. The proposal is also consistent with adjacent
and surrounding land uses and zoning. Such uses include commercial,
mlltiple family and undeveloped area. The subject rezone represents
ai expansion of an existing B-1 zone (approx 4.8 acres) to provide
sifficient area to accommodate a planned shopping center use. Suitable
roadways and utilities exist at the site to provide for the proposed
use. Suitable additional on-site and adjacent improvements, utilities,
and storm drainage facilities will be constructed to city standards
to further mitigate potential impacts. The concept of a planned
commercial center with compatible building architecture planned build-
ing locations, comprehensive landscaping, storm drainage control, and
planned access points will greatly mitigate potential impacts. (see
below for further justification. )
9. F.rst phase of construction will begin as soon as possible given suit-
a]?le time for the site planning and architectural design process,
financing arrangements, and further government review and approvals.
l' TYe major tenant first phase will have a significant attractive effect
on demand for development of the second phase.
B. Compatibility with,Comprehensive Plan
1. Land Use Map Element
They subject site is designated for commercial use on the recently adopted
Northeast Renton Comprehensive plan (adopted in December, 1981) . The
site was specifically considered for a commercial shopping center land
use at that
Time. The map element was amended and expanded from the
existing 4.8- acres of B-1 zoning adjacent to the subject site and the
intersection to a larger area that would be capable of supporting a
planned commercial center. No zoning beyond that which already exists
at Ithe intersection. was specifically considered at that time, given the
city's policy not to reclassify on an areawide basis in conjunction with
its comprehensive planning efforts. The initiation of reclassifications
are left to the property owners and reviewed on an individual basis subse-
quent to the comprehensive plan adoption. However, the inclusion of the
subject site is the commercial designation of the comprehensive plan
indicated that the potential zone and use is commercial.
G.
Additional Justification
Page 2
The zoning which now exists on the site was established prior to the
latiest comprehensive plan amendment. The 'G, general classification is
a "
holding zone" established at the time the area was annexed to the
city on The G zone is a large lot residential zone and
is not generally utilized for development purposes. The exising R-3
classification occurred in and is not compatible with the
recent NE Renton Comprehensive Plan document which now designates
tha: portion of the site commercial as well.
The proposed rezone to B-1 and subsequent planned commercial center- is
compatible with the ,size and location of the commercial land use map j
element designation. A commercial center needs a site with sufficient
relatively level area free of encumbrances. It is also necessary that
it front on at least one and possibly two arterial streets. The map
element represents such locational strategy emphasizing the primary
east-west transportation corridor of NE 4th St. (see sec. II NE Renton C.P. )
The proposed zoning and use is also compatible with the proposed ,
office park land use designation for the surrounding area north and east
Of the site. (see' section II, second paragraph) A sizeable planned
commercial center will provide consistent architecture,land use,
landiscaping, and access, as well as providing a critical commercial hub
which could stimulate the potential for such office park use. Without
a sufficient commercial node it is quite doubtful that office uses is
this! area could be successfully developed. I
2. Policies Elements (NE Renton Comp. plan)
a. Commercial Development Policies.
The 1roposed rezone and development of a commercial shopping center is
consistent with policy 1, 2, 4, and 6. The proposed center will be
located at a strategic intersection along a primary east-west trans-
port tion corridor. (NE 4th St. ) Concentration of commercial uses
into planned centers easily accessable from the surrounding residential
areas is an important planning tool. It provides a node of intensive
actil I__ity which can be better developed and controlled, than a scattered
strip" commercial pattern. Providing adequate size to accommodate a
wide variety of retail services to attract more local users, thus re-
ducing trip travel time and conjestion elsewhere in the city is also
important. A strong positive justification for a community sized
shopping facility is' the effect it will have on reducing many of the
longer trips that residents of the area must now take to the Highlands,
to Sunset Blvd. , or even downtown Renton. This helps to reduce energy
conslmption and reduces the load on other streets in the city. (see
section II (13),ECF) The proposed rezone and development accomplishes
this and establishes;a suitable basis for a planned shopping center.
Such planning would include building design and location, parking,
landscaping, and adjacent roadway improvements. Such development is
more acceptable and creates much less impact than scattered unrelated
commercial development.
b: General Land Use ,Policies
The iroposed rezone and development is consistent with the general
land use policies of the NE Renton Comprehensive plan. Besides the
advantage of providing employment and needed additional retail services
to the growing population of the area, it will also be consistent with
existing and planned transportation, community facilities and utili-
ties for the area. The present traffic counts (see section II (13) of
the ECF for more detailed information) indicate sufficient volume along
the NE 4th St. corridor to justify the proposed development. A signi-
ficant market area now exists along the NE 4th St. corridor extending
further north and south in a "funnel shape" the farther east it gets from
FAI 405. Recent multiple family and single family development in the
area together with planned population increases to the area in the
near future could benefit greatly from such retail service use. The
proposal will not have a significant effect on community facilities
because it has a relatively low demand for such services. Less demand
is' also placed on utilities for commercial development, as opposed to
Additional Justification
Page 3
the residential load for such services. However, the proposal is con-
sistent with comprehensive plan policies with respect to planned growth
where utilities are readily available. Water, sewer, and storm drainage
1fa cilities to city standards can all be provided to the entire site,
and development of these will extend them in a progressive fashion in
conjunction with the city's utility plans to other properties in the
area. This helps to realize the NE Renton Comprehensive plan policy
to encourage the progression of land development logically from west to
ea t, thereby reducing the costs of extension and maintenance of utility
expansions too far ahead of the growth pattern (Land Use Policy #3, NE
Renton Comp. Plan) :
3. Po icies Element of General Comprehensive Plan.
The subject proposal is also consistent with the general city-wide
ipoiicies element of the Comprehensive plan.
a. The proposal is consistent with sections 1 and 2 of this document
gi IIen the planned approach utilized in such development. The site is
conducive to such development. It is relatively level, has good soils,
no significant natural elements, is compatible with other adjacent and
surrounding commercial uses, and zoning, and will upgrade the site
an area.
b. Section 2, Economic Goals and Policies, are assisted by the proposal
through the increase 'in jobs and tax base with a minor load on the public
services and utilities.
c. Section 3 the Urban Design Goals are enhanced by the proposal
through the creation of a coordinated development scheme for the site.
The site is adjacent to and near other commercial uses, and represents a
logical and progressive step in the pattern of development for the area.
All city services are now available to the site. The district within
which the site is located will be well served by the additional commercial
services of the proposal. Because of the transitional nature of the area
being in the logical path of development) the few existing single family
uses on the site and in the surrounding area have shown some signs of
decline. This is aitypical situation which will be improved greatly by
the proposed development. The District Image, landscaping and sign
objectives and policies will also be realized through comprehensive plan-
ning, design, and landscape plans associated with such shopping center
devkpment.
d. Section 5 of the policies element relates to commercial development.
The proposal is compatible with the goals, objectives and policies of
this section. Its planned character and excellent location at a
strategic intersection promotes an attractive, functional and convenient
cluster of commercial uses. Such a center will serve the existing resi-
dents and future planned population for the NE 4th St. corridor eastward
into the county where very few services exist now or are planned in the
future. Such a location will also serve the recent apartment, condominium,
mobille home park and single family residents who have moved into the
area within the past several years, and will reduce existing and future
trips to retail areas further away or more difficult to reach (ie. in-
sufficient street network or indirect travel through a residential area) .
Existing commercial zoning within the corridor has been utilized for
some of the multiple family growth or in an inharmonius, scattered strip
effect, thus eliminating the possibilities except at the subject loca-
tion for a sufficiently scaled planned shopping center. Even without
such usurping of commercial zoned land the subject site is more
cent ally located to the market area it will serve.
1
The hole concept of, the planned shopping center will be compatible with
the concepts and policies for variety of uses, compatibility of design,
and minimizing of impacts to the area.
li
Additional Justification
Page L .
C. Timeliness of Rezone
1. No commercial zoning of sufficient size, character, and suitable
ideation to the market area presently exists in this area. Much of
ttie existing B-1 zoning in the area has been converted to other uses
oil fragmentized by scattered development so that a planned shopping
center cannot be constructed on existing zoned land in this important
corridor. Sufficient area of business zoning is requested in the
proposal to accommodate the short term needs for phased development
o a community shopping center. It is important to provide suffi-
c'ent area to accommodate major uses such as supermarket, drug,
ha,rdward stores as' well as a variety of other retail services, banks,
eating, recreation; establishments, or other campatible commercial
and service uses. ! The initial phase of development will utilize a
majority of the subject site (approx+9.5 acres) . Once this occurs
it is likely the additional phase (4- acres) will follow shortly, given
tle``magnet effect of the principal uses (ie. Safeway and Payless) .
The total area is considered a short term utilization and should be
planned to functionally and aesthetically relate as a total shopping
center.
2. Suitable utilities with sufficient capacity and other city services
are presently available to the site. Development of the site will
he!lp to provide such utilities for the surrounding area in a. logical
prlogressive manner in conjunction with the city's utility plans for
the area.
3. The intersection of NE 4th St. , and Union Avenue NE has recently
been improved and is capable of additional traffic from the proposal.
The roadway itself together with the improvements along the frontage of
the property associated with the development can handle the resulting
traffic patterns. Much of the increases will be positive in terms of
relieving traffic pressures elsewhere from existing longer and more
indirect travel patterns. (see traffic study section II (13) of
Environmental Checklist for additional information)
14. Private residential and commercial development has progressed
in the area to the point where the proposed shopping center is a viable
us?. Representatives of Safeway have reviewed the market and indicate a
strong potential for the proposed shopping center. The recent growth
in4the immediate area has been substantial. Nearby apartments, condo-
minium, mobile home parks, and single family subdivisions have provided
a potential user in close proximity to the site. Several large resi-
dential developments are planned in the near future for the area in-
cluding, additions to the mobile home . park (Leisure Estates) , the
Northward Homes P.U.D (Cascadia Annexation) , U.S. Homes P.U.D. near
NE 3rd Street extension, Belterra Development single family project
Union Avenue NE near Fernwood) . These large projects combined with
scattered smaller projects, and the existing extensive residential area
to the east in King County provide a substantial near term market for
the proposed center. The center will also be compatible with and
supplement the existing smaller node of retail services at or near the
intersection of NE '4th and Union Avenue NE. The subject proposal re-
presents a logical step in the development pattern of the area, and
fulfills the need to accommodate a variety of land uses to create
Ian identifiable and functional sub area of the city.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
CITY OF RENTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
MA D
BUILpINGR/CONING191982
DEPT.FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
p
Application No.
Environmental Checklist No. EC/
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS: 1
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions 'and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major action's significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklistlis to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major actipn.
Please answer the following qestions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation lin the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should Intl de the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be, involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in Ithe future.
NOTE: This a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a questionidoes not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I . BACKGOUND
1. Name of Proponent
I Bennett r ult•ives L, et:.al L
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
17422 - 108th Avenue SE Renton, Wash. A2f155
255 - 9448
3. Date Checklist submitted
4.
Agency
requiring Checklist City of Renton Building Department
5. game of p,roposal , if applicable:
Rezone from C and R-3 to B-1, Business
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
see attached
2_
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent 'of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any' other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental, setting of the proposal ) :
see attached
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
Summer - Fall 1983
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
federal , state and local--including rezones) :
see attached
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:
see attached',
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain:
see attached
112. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
II
1) Earth. Will the proposal result in :
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?X
YES M YBE NO
b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil? X
YEr- MAYBE NO
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
YEs- MAYBE AU-
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? x
Yam- MAYBE NO
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site?X
YES MAYBE NO
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
Explanation:
see attached
YES M Nb
o-
3_
2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
a) Air emissions or deterioration,.of ambient air
quality?
Yt MAYBE NO
b) The creation olf objectionable odors?
X
YES MAYBE 3
r) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally? I
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: see attached
3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
X
YES MAYBE NO
1
b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
Xtherateandamountofsurfacewaterrunoff?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Alterations toe the course or flow of flood waters?
X
YES MAYBE NO
d) Change in the ',amount of surface water in any water
body? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface wateriquality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?X
YES MITE au—
f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters
X
YES MAYBE NO
g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals.,. or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
I YES MAYBE NO
h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,
X
or other substances into the ground waters?
YES M YBE NO
0 Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
X
for public water supplies?
YB RUBE
Explanation:
I see attached
I I
4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
la) Change in theldiversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass., crops ,xx
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YES MAYBE— NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? X
YET— RAYNE NO
lc) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
1 in. a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?
yrs— MAYBE NB
d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
YES MAYBE NO
I I
Explanation: see attached -
4-
5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
X
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
Xoffauna?
YES MAYBE NO
d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: _ see attached
6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: see attached
7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
X
Y E S MBE fa--
Explanation:see attached
8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? X—Present X—Planned
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: see attached
9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
see attached
0) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
X
TES-- TOTE NO
Explanation:
1) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
X
of an area?
Y
Explanation:
see attached
Illillirr4
r
A
5-
12) Housing. Will the propolsal affect existing housing, or
X
create a demand for additional housing?
I
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
see attached
1
I
1
1
13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
I
YES-
I-
MAYBE NO
b) Elffects on existing parking facilities , or demand
X
for new parking? l YES MAYBE NO
1 1
c) Ilmpact upon existiing transportation systems? X
I YES MAYBE WU-
1
d) llterations to present patterns of circulation or
X
novement of people, and/or goods?
YES FUR' NO
e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
IYam- MAYBE 0
I
f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
gee attached
I
1
I 1
I
I 1
14) Public Services. Will' the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in ar}y of the following areas :
a) Fire protection? !
X
YES MAYBE NO
I
b) Police protection?
1
YES— MAYBE NO
1 X
c) Schools?
YES MAYBE NO
I
d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
I YES MAYBE NO
e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
I
f) Other governmental services?
X
I YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
see attached
I
I
15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
X
the development' of new sources of energy?
YES MAYBE R—
I
Explanation: see attached
1
1
16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
a) Power or natural gas?
X
YES MAYBE NO
b1e Communications systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
X
c) Water?
YES MAYBE NO
e I
1J,.
6-
d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
YES MAYBE NO
e) Storm water drainage? X
YES TOTE T l
f) Solid waste and disposal? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
see attached
17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? X
YES RPM" TU—
Explanation:
18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
X
site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: see attached
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
Xqualityorquantityofexistingrecreationalopportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
20 ) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical X
site, structure, object or building?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
1 -1 true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
r!tion of non-significance that it might issue in re - .ance upon this . klist should
tlere be any willful misrepresentation or willful 1 . of ful •1s• osur- on my part.
Proponent:
igned
Michael L. Smith
name printed) V. P. Planning
Belterra Dev. Corp.
Environmental Checklist
Supplemental Attachment
Bennett .- Multivest; et al
Rezone From G a R-3 to B-1
I
This attachment contains further explanations of the various questions of
ll
the Environmental Checklist. Additional information is also contained in
the recent Environmental Impact.
1. BAC<GROUND
6. Explanation
The proposal is a reclassification of approximately 8.5 acres of
property from G, General ClassificaTion (7.1- acres) and R-3,
Medium Density Multiple Family (1.4- acres) to B-1, Business.
The subject reclassification will permit the combining of the sub-
ject property with adjacent existing B-1 property (approx 5.7 acres)
to develop a planned shopping center complex. The total area of exist-
ing and proposed B-1 zoning will be approximately 14 acres, which
is an ideal size for a shopping center composed of major uses to-
gether with a variety of other retail and business uses.
f,
The initial phase of the planned development will utilize approximately
I,
9. 5- acres of property and will consist of the major uses (ie. Super-
market, Drug and Hardward stores) together with a variety of smaller
shops, banks, or restaurants. The existing 5.7- acres of B-1 zoning
is of insufficient size for a properly planned shopping center complex
and the variety of retail services which it should provide. All
development will conform to City of Renton standards.
7. The subject 8.5 acre site is located at the NE quadrant of the
intersection of NE 4th St. and Union Avenue NE. It is a portion
of property owned by the applicant that is presently zoned B-1
but too small for a normal sized community shopping center. An exist-
ing Texaco service station presently exists directly at the inter-
section. The surrounding area near the intersection of NE 4th St.
and Union Avenue NE has experienced scattered commercial growth
unrelated in design compatibility and function. The trend for com-
mercial support uses has been established in the community, but
hasn't been properly planned and developed. The area has been and'
will continue to be one of the most significant residential growth
areas of the city. The subject site is relatively level and has no
significant natural vegetation or other unique natural features.
The frontage along NE 4th St. when combined with the westerly 214:4
feet is approximately 803 feet, and extends eastward to a point
approximately 945 feet east of Union Ave. NE Although the subject
rezone has no frontage along Union Ave. NE it is part of the exist-
ing B-1 zoned property which extends from the north line of the
Texaco station approximately 418 feet to a point approximately 575
feet north of NE 4th Street. See site and zoning maps included in
the application.
8. Summer - Fall 1983
9. Rezone - City of Renton
Site Plan and Utility Plan Review - City of Renton
Building Permits - City of Renton
10. Not beyond the subject rezone area at this time. The easterly 4.5±
acres will be part of the second stage of development occurring
j subsequent to the establishment of the major uses and the 1st
phase small uses.
Supplemental Attachmei
Page -2-
11. Yes. Safeway has purchased the first phase area of the subject
site, which is the majority of the property and plans to build a
supermarket and Vavie+x/Drug Store together with a variety of other
uses.
12. See #1.9 above
11 ENVIROMENTAL IMPACTS
1) Earth -- The rezone itself is an administrative and legislative
action and will not by itself create any environmental impacts.
However,
ultimate development of the site as a planned community
shopping center will cause some impacts to the site and surrounding
properties.
Specifically with regard to the soil and ground structure certain
disruptions, compaction, and overcovering of soils, as well as some
changes in topography are anticipated as part of the above mentioned
development. Given the stable soils on the site and its relatively
level slope these impacts are not considered significant and will be
the minimum necessary to adequately construct the planned struc-
tures and improvements.
The soils consist of Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loan (AgC) , according
to the King County Soil survey information of the U. S. Soil
Conservation Service. This soil is excellent for urban-type devel-
opment. The relatively level slope of the site will also minimize
the amount of on and off-site erosion that may occur during site
development. City requirements for temporary erosion control measures
will be achieved during construction to further mitigate associated
impacts. The surrounding and adjacent land is relatively undeveloped,
but nonetheless will be protected by suitable site planning and con-
struction techniques consistent with city requirements.
2) Air -- Ultimate development of the site will cause a certain amount -
emissions on a temporary basis during construction, and more perman-
tly from additional vehicular traffic. However, certain positive
air impacts may occur as a result of the reduction of trips and trip
lengths, thereby reducing the amount of air emissions on a areawide
basis. The NE Renton Comprehensive Plan also addresses air emissions
in its study of the future growth on the plateau in which the subject
site is included. The area presently does not exceed ambient air
quality standards as noted in Table 1 of the NE Renton EIS.
It1phouldalsobenotedthatfuturetechnologiesandcontinuingimprove-
ients in vehicle emission control systems and enforcement will also
have a mitigating effect on air quality in the area.
3) Water -- No significant streams, lakes or water bodies exist on
the subject site. A seasonal drainage ditch that has been chan-
nelized is located west of the subject rezone area. This ditch
has been culverted extensively by projects both north and south
of the site, and is not considered a natural stream bed. Another
small seasonal drainage ditch is located on the site near NE 4th
Street. During times of heavy precipitation some minor impound-
ment of water occurs just east of the Water District pump station,
because of inadequate maintenance resulting in reduced capacity,
This situation will be resolved when improved drainage facili-
ties are constructed as part of future site development. Ulti-
ate development of the site will change certain drainage patterns
and absorption rates on the site. Storm drainage facilities
designed to City Standards will provide storm water retention/
detention facilities which will control rate of runoff from the
kite to that which presently exists for a specified design level.
This requirement will serve to mitigate impact's of drainage
off the subject site. No direct uncontrolled storm drainage
discharge will occur from development of the site. Oil/water sep-
dration
facilities are also required by the City's drainage or-
inance. ' Ultimate development of the site will change
certain drainage patterns and absorption rates on the site. Storm
drainage facilities designed to City Standards will providestormWaterretention/detention facilities which will control rate of
runoff from the site to that which presently exists for a specified
design level. This requirement will serve to mitigate impacts of
drainage off the subject site. No direct uncontrolled storm drainage
discharge will occur from development of the site. Oil/water separ-
4tion facilities are also required by the City's drainage ordinance.
tlo critical ground water aquifer is apparent on the site, and excava-
tion/grading activities are not considered substantial enough to
ilntercept such waters. The site is well-grained with no standing
Environmental Checklist
Supplemental Attachment
Page -3-
water. Minor indirect effects to absorption rates may occur through
the addition of impervious surfaces to the site.
4) Flora -- The site has been previously cleared and revegetated with a
mixture of natural deciduous trees primarily Alder, Maple and
Cottonwood with some small clusters of evergreen remaining particularly
near the existing single family structures. Man-induced shrubs,
flowers, grasses and trees are predominent around the existing
structures. The remaining groundcover is a mixture of brush and
scrub grasses typical of the region and a second growth ,previously
cleared site.
Ultimate development of the site will remove all of the existing
vegetation of the site, with the exception of certain specimens of
the few existing evergreens that can be reasonably incorporated into
the landscape plan.
No unique, rare or endangered species of flora exist on the site.
Additional species and numbers of flora will be introduced to the
site as part of the comprehensive landscaping plan associated with
its development.
5) Fauna -- The proposal will disrupt the existing vegetation of the
site which provides habitat for certain fauna. However, such fauna
is limited to small mammals such as rodent varieties, birds, reptiles,
and insects indigenous to the typical western Washington suburban
semi-wooded environment. The subject development will displace
certain fauna through forced migration to adjacent and surrounding
properties of similar character. The size and character of the
habitat is such that it does not represent sufficient quality to
provide meaningful wildlife habitat. No unique, rare, or endangered
species are apparent on the site. New species of trees and shrubs
within the overall landscaping plan will attract some species of
fauna.
6) Noise -- Existing noise levels on the site will be altered on a
temporary basis by construction activity, and on a permanent basis
by the continued operation of a shopping center use. The location of
the subject site adjacent to two, arterial streets, one of which is a
major arterial, inherently assume a certain ambient noise level due
to a fairly constant traffic volume. The operation of a shopping
center will not significantly add to such ambient levels given such
existing background levels. Increases in noise levels at certain
times (deliveries and peak shopping times) can be expected particu-
larly near the north and east boundaries of the site. However, these
will be mitigated by the proposed location of the buildings near the
north and east perimeters of the site with the parking between the
buildings and the arterial streets.
The City of Renton has a noise ordinance which establishes certain
allowable maximum environmental sound levels, thus mitigating
impacts due to noise. The proposed use will conform to these es-
tablished standards.
7) Light and Glare -- It is anticipated that new forms of light and
glare will be introduced to the site and surrounding area upon
development. Such additions are typical of a suburban commercial
area and do not represent a. substantial hazardous, or nuisance
situation. Such impacts are primarily due to automobile parking
areas, lighting', and reflective surfaces of the structures. Such
impacts can be partially mitigated by suitable landscaping throughout
the site, and by appropriate building design and facade treatments.
Such impacts will be primarily associated with the front or street
sides of the development and therefore are more compatible with
that environment. Landscape buffers will be established between
Env.iro' mental Checklist
Supple ental Attachment
Page - -
the site uses and the streets,as well an on the site perimeters.
Parking area lighting can be designed to minimize off-site impacts.
81 Land Use -- Please refer to the Rezone Application and its attachment
information for supplementary explanation of this question. The
rezone proposal will permit the design and development of a planned
community shopping facility. The present use of the site will,
therefore, be changed from its relatively undeveloped state ( 4 older
single family residences exist on the subject rezone site) to a
planned commercial use. The shopping center is projected to fill a
need for a variety of additional retail and business services in the
neighborhood and market area extending eastward along NE 4th St.
into King County.
The proposal will not alter the planned use for the site and area.
It represents an expansion of existing B-1 zoning to provide suffi-
cient area for the intended -use, which is compatible with the NE
Renton Comprehensive Plan. The proposal therefore facilitates the
present and planned need for such a facility to balance the growth
and liveability of the area.
Previous commercial development in the area has been scattered and
more of a strip-nature. Commercial uses presently exist at the
remaining 3 quadrants of the intersection and also extend in a
strip" character westward along NE 4th St. The only existing suit-
ably sized parcel of B-1 zoned property has been developed as a large
apartment complex rather than planned shopping center (ie. NE 4th
and Monroe Avenue NE)) thus reducing appropriate property presently
available and serviceable except for the subject site.
The north and west portions of the site are relatively undeveloped.
A few older single family structures exist but are some distance
from the boundaries of the subject site. A recently constructed
apartment-condo unit is located northwest of the subject rezone site.
Such use does not comply with the existing Comprehensive Plan, but
is generally used as ,a buffer use between commercial uses and lower
density residential.
Proposed Comprehensive Plans indicate a large amount of office and
multiple family uses north and east of the site. Such planned
uses will compliment the proposed shopping center and vice-versa.
9) Natural Resources -- The proposal will utilize some natural re-
sources including fossil fuels, wood products, and gravel as a result
of construction and future habitation. However, such utilization is
not considered substantial given the relatively small size of the
site and scope of the development with respect to the total comsump-
tion or rate of depletion of non-renewable natural resources.
11) Population -- The subject proposal will not directly add to the
population of the area. - It may, however, stimulate a certain amount
of additional population growth.
It will have a direct effect of serving the existing and planned
population for the area, thereby providing a degree of balance and
self-sustaining influence. The area will be more liveable as a re-
sult of providing a close convenient and well-planned variety of
retail services.
Some employment opportunities for existing and future area residents
will be created by the development and its stimulation of planned
office uses. This proposal is consistent with the projections and
planned growth rate of the NE Renton Comprehensive Plan.
Environmental Checklist
Supple+ntal Attachment
Page -5-
12) Housing -- The explanation of (11) closely correlates the explan-
ation with regard to housing, given the non-residential nature of
the proposal. Such impacts can only be considered as possible
secondary and tertiary effects of the proposed use.
13) Transportation/Circulation
cc arflbe.Ls4 1r.a is analysis
14) Public Services -- The area is presently within the City of Renton
and therefore, receives the various services provided by the City.
Other existing developments in the viciniy already utilize such
services. There will be certain demands upon such services created
by the proposed development. However, the magnitude of this demand
as a sole need for new services is not significant. Services may be
altered to a minor degree as compared to the total city-wide demand
for governmental 'services. Such services are generally provided on
an increasing demand basis as the overall population increases,
and according to ratios and levels of service acceptable by the
citizens and the elected. officials. The additional tax base, consumer
spending, construction employment and the City's system development
fee will help mitigate such impacts.
Generally)•commercial development has less impact on the city's fire
police, library, parks, and other similar services than residential
uses.
Buildings, utilities, and other site improvements will be developed
to city fire, building, and zoning code requirements thus reducing
potential demand of services. Utility construction will facili-
tate the city's plans for provision of such services further east
of the site. Roadway improvements along street frontages will
improve street and intersection appearance and function.
15) Energy -- The development of the subject site will place minor
demands on energy consumption relative to the whole. No new sources
of energy will be required as a result of the proposal. Some
energy conservation will occur as a result of locating a variety
of retail services in one location proximate to a substantial
residential growth area.
16) Utilities -- All of the above noted utilities are available to the
site and are of adequate capacity to serve the site. Such utilities
will be extended into the site and to the site boundaries as re-
quired by the plans of the various agencies. No substantial exten-
sions of utilities are anticipated. All design and construction
will conform to the requirements of the City of Renton and other
public and private utility agencies.
18) Aesthetics -- It is a highly subjective opinion as to whether or
not the site as it now exists is a scenic vista. The site does not
have any unique features that categorize it as a scenic vista, nor
I
Environmental Checklist
Supplemental Attachment
Page -6-
is there any such vista on the surrounding property.
Some people may not think the planned development is aesthetically
pleasing. However, the nature of the shopping center use and the
planned elements (ie. buildings, landscaping, parking, lighting,
signing, etc. ) create an orderly and more aesthetically pleasing
atmosphere than scattered unrelated retail development. Such
measures help mitigate potential impacts due to aesthetic consider-
ations.
1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR SUBJECT REZONE AREA CITY OF RE 'P N
IV 1T110PARCELA:
MAR 1 198?
The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township
23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. ;
EXCEPT the North 629 feet' thereof; 17;71 .AND EXCEPT the West 305 feet of the South 65 feet of the North 694 feet
AND EXCEPT the Southerly 629 feet of the Westerly 396.4 feet thereof;
AND EXCEPT that portion thereof described as follows:
Beginning at a point 30 feet North of the Southeast corner of said West 1/2 of
the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 10; thence West 250 feet;
thence North 436 feet;
thence. East 250 feet;
thence South 436 feet to the point of beginning;
AND EXCEPT' the most Southerly 42 feet thereof for S. E. 128th Street as conveyed
to King County by deeds recorded under Recording Nos. 5741040 and 5741044;
AND EXCEPT the most Westerly 40 feet thereof for Union Avenue N.E. ;
PARCEL' B
That portion of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section lb, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , descibed as follows:
Beginning 42 feet North and 75 feet West of the Southeast corner of said West 1/2;
thence;We t 175 feet;
thence North 424 feet;
thenceiEast 175 feet;
thence ,South 424 feet to the point of beginning;
PARCEL C
The East 75 feet of the following:
Beginning 42 feet North of the Southeast corner of the West 1/2 of the Southwest
1/4 of tte Southwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M.
in King C unty, Washington;
thence We t 250 feet;
thence No th 424 feet;
thence Ea t 250 feet;
thence [South 424 feet to the point of beginning;
PARCEL ;D
The West 175 feet of the south 622 feet of the East half of the Southwest
quarter o the Southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5
East W.M. , in King County,1 Washington;
1
EXCEPT the South 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by deed
recorded under Recording No. 5790505.
Situate. in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington
PARCEL t
The South 1 /2 of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the Southwest quarter of the
Southwest suarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5, East, W.M. , in
King County, Washington, except the South 622 feet of the West 175 feet,
and except the South 470 feet thereof.
Together) w th an easement for ingress and egress 15 feet in width across,
over and u on the West 1/2 of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter
of the Sou hwest quarter of said section 10, the centerline of which is described
as follows Beginning at the Southwest corner of said section 10; thence South
88' 02'43" East 821.38 feet; thence North O'17'02" West '142 feet to the point of
beginning; thence North O'17'32" West 580 feet to the terminus of said line;. ex-
cept that portion thereof included in the hereinable descibed main tract.
1
j
Legal De-cription for Subject Rezone Area
Page 2-
PARCEL F
The Sout 250 feet of thel West half of the East half of the Southwest quarter,
of the Southwest quarter, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 east, W.M.
in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT, the West 175 feet;
EXCEPT the South 42 feet conveyed to King County under King County
Recordin No. 5738286.
PARCEL G
The Nort 110 feet of the South 360 feet of the West half of the East half of
the sout west quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23
North,' R ge 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 175
feet thereof. TOGETHER with an easement for ingrass and egress of 15 feet
in width over, across and, upon the following described real estate in King
County, ashington: Over the South 220 feet of the West half of the East half
of the so thwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township
23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , in King County, Washington, the centerline of
which is efined as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Sec-
tion 10; thence South South 88. 02' 43" East 821.38 feet; thence North
0. 17' 32" West 30 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 0. 17' 32"
West 220 eet.
PARCEL H
The South 470 feet of the' Sotith 1/2 of the West 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the
southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 10, Township 23
North,, Ra ge 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 175
feet ther of and EXCEPT the South 360 feet thereof and EXCEPT the East 98
feet of the North 60 feet thereof.
Together with an easement 15 feet in width for roadway and utilities across,
over and upon the West 1/2 of the southeast quarter of the southwest
quarter or the southwest quarter of said section 10, the centerline of
which is escribed as follows:
i
Beginning at the Southwest corner of said section 10; thence South
88' 02' 43" East 821.38 feet; thence North 0. 17' 32" West 42 feet to the
point of beginning; thence North 0. 17' 32" West 580 feet to the terminus
of said lne; EXCEPT that portion thereof included in hereinabove described
main tract. (Tax lot 333. in section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. )
1
i
1 1
I
CITY OF RENTON
AFFIDAVIT gER [Ell \WR
MAR 19 1982
BUILuiNG/ZUNING DEPT.
I
r
Del Sennett
being duly sworn, declare that I
am the osner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
lc f}
Subscribed and sworn before me
this day of /Y1 ,0.„L 19622, ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing
atAc
rNne zif o ary Pu 1 c) Signature o er
7471/O r. (4/fry ;,Q4T-p.„ IfilA 15 17422 - 108th Ave. SE Suite 200
Address)
Address)
Renton, Washington 98055
City) State)
255-9448
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application.
Date Received 19 By:
Renton Planning Dept.t.
2-73
AFFIDAVIT
CITY OF RENTON
MAR 19 1982
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
I ,James da Silva
being duly swbrn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are ! in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this ,tb
day of rnQ,-j 19 "2 ,
Notary Pu lic in and for the State of
Washington residing .at
A
Name t r Pu lic)Sign
iv st, Ltd Owner
l 7y/D YYL, / 1,„?/, e.r. 9f 17422 - 108th Ave. SE, Suite 201
Address) !
TTiw
j /
4
Address)
Renton, Washington 98055
City) State)
255-6064
Telephone)
FOR OFFI E USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is t
certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has ben found to be thorough and complete in every particular, and to
conform to the rules a14d regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of, such application.
Date Received 19 By:
Renton Planning Dept.
2-73
AFFIDAVIT
caps®}
Rnp
This affidavit is toIDaccompanyrezoneapplicationMAR191982
on tax lot 89 in 10-23-5
41=
11N,
GdeclareuN11VGDEPT.I , Henry Ba1ko
being duly that I
am the own*r of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith s.ibmitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. i.
r•-‘u' '---'"'''0\ C-.' Fr... iter"( 1>
Subscribed and sworn before me
this 2 7 day of
FEBRUARY 19 82 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Renton
Of
nelP 41(,_ 0 1,4( 4L
ame of Notary Public) ignature 0 e
645 Shattuc Ave South Rentnn, Wash 98055,
P.O. Box 68562, Seattle 98168
Address) Address)
City) State)
763 1564
Telephone)
FOR OFFI E USE ONLY)
1 CERTIFICATION
This is tI certify that , the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform tdl the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received 19 By :
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
I
1
CITY OF RENTON
AFFIDAVIT
1 ildfiREMYRDMAR191982
1
BUILDING/ZONING DEPT.
I, 777 r' . 6_ 4'T!E being duly sworn, declare that I
am the ow er of the property involved In this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief
1
g E: F&---204,,Ei Aeom c,„..„--,...,_ -,---i geermY-7-:s7.2r.
Subscribed and sworn before me 326 ///e 4 707k/ /4` '9 SS
this awQ day of Mav c 19 % ` 0 lP_ (•:
o,„. G Ili )
Notary Public in and for the State of
W1,
s . ng ton, residing at Ste e._
A,* .
A I
Name of Notary. Public) ctket.srtose.toRzert, nr
ig .ature of Owner
541.b va+,lnoe '01..E letSe.•. , t ubA dittos' At 0,
Address) Address) 1
i
niza 7'/33
City) State)
li III
Q h
1
Telephone)
1
1
I
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) I
CERTIFICATION
This isl'1to certify that the foregoing application has been inspecteid by me
and haslbeen found to be thorough and complete in every particular land to
conform,' to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Departmient
governing the filing of such application .
I
Date Received 19 By:
I
i
Renton Planning Dept .'
2-73
1
AFFIDAVIT
CITY OIa RENTTON
fa 1.1MAR191982
BUILDING/ZONING D PT
I , L.a- 1 3/,- : a„,being duly sworn , declare that I
am the ow eir of the prop rty involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith Isu. mitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief . . Af/eAc.'c;.4,nbv- p'cZ`n-ie -Ira,,.. v„'''a.`c"" 'Cd .f'o`e'/J'
u_S'e. o+ -
f'-e
r rvp—
a} Y3:_0 - A/. - jF (
4
S , /e e-, vim. <4/f4--
Subscribed and sworn before me GC2f(
p
sct:o.„S , I1i
this eday of 19g
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, resiOing at )r.S-,. /-----
Name of ,peat, Y°r "P_: ic) . ig ature of Ow er) i
ic1,„ y y- fie./4
Address) , •
Address) .
City) State)
sY 7
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received 19 By :
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
s' CITY OF RENTON
AFFIDAVIT IT P 1E IJ W . EMAR191982
13UIC.DiNC'4 AJI NG DEPT.
I, RICHARD GRANT
being duly sworn, declare that I
am the ow 'er of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith ubmitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief:
Subscribed and sworn before me
this
16
day of MARCH 19 82 ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at RENTON, WA.
1
1,.,4:1, _, 7
Name of N' tary ublic) , Signature/of Owner)
19514 S.E. 134 ST. RENTON, WASHINGTON 12901 172 AVENUE S.E.
Address) Address)
i
RENTON,WASHINGTON
City) State)
226-0418
Telephone)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has be n found to be, thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform toithe rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing he filing of ;such application .
Date Received 19 By :
Renton Planning Dept'.
2-73
I
0 11 F.
MAR 1 9 ton Li
2 AFFIDAVIT OF KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO . 90
EPT.
3 STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss
4 County of King '
5
6 RICHARD GRANT being first duly sworn on oath, deposes
7 and says :
8 That I am the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners
9 of King County Water District No. 90 . That King County
10 W ter District 'No. 90 'by and through ,its Commissioners does
11 not object to and does hereby join in a Petition for rezone
12 o certain property owned by King County Water District No.
13 9 and being adjacent to, surrounded by, and within the
14
pi'
operty contained in the Bennett-Multivest, et al Petition
15 to which I attached this Affidavit .
16
17 j.
Ri hard Grant
18
SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this 1L day of March,
19 1682 .
20
alvtja
21 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for
the State of Washington
22
residing at / q,s ,q 1 '/
23 v7
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Harpold &Fiori
Attorneys at Law
3204 Auburn Way North
Auburn,Washington 98002
206)833-5001 838-0510
1 TX \ A-''' • Cg
figtr•.. :
7":). 2%S.' . F161444," •
11' , -
651 - .. .
1 'q::"'M •
t
3q j r.•,?
SO• $1 •T 6®5, L.'';;3410 '33232 ' ; ' :, 33282',
s_..::; 1-'.+`::
i uT N y1'/;j
a'
1y'
1' I1, Q_
1,
I - k I .'< _'' t•-'r;:;
h7', S:-. 2i IN:
I',A tit tit. I.
i, 1 i1b1.) i,$ • 1 i1`7
O. #;O's• 24 0'9 'S33 81 T 434 L •259D
1d3 ^
r.l, , '
r,'^-iir::7, . - ,
I r,
g {]
F 14
j
F I 10110 i 2;106919t:•1"1—.,.,d,..`.
i:1. i 'V ' . 13+ 71" M9. (l `
1 I3'7'
SR. t 1 ;* tt,,E.,S N E i FT LESS
1x4 vai 1 ;, ; N t LI 1S CORD
r i 'W
Z861 dW .
1c-2'-05. 9025 .09.533 51 T 434 1, 1690P
s'j
L,-
N-i;8
B.T. FLAT 0 I'.' 'Ip9C 26504..' t ^'F.;.:D a-' R!''. ,11'• RE R:`'" C Rli°: l
1 SE .I:51.i S1 A T : 11,".• 1101';I`i1 SD' ^\i 1 V.1gr:F t.l W> r-0. r+ ...;;. 1:: 1/(' OF s,
l0 Qi i NOild
OA117t
t,
I3SSc,
1 FT
O -,ESS CO.RD
3 10-1 -05
I
9026 ' 9 760 Si •T.'685 L •1470 - • ' ' ' '
02 05-9t726-07
DOVE BUD D , E 2, O FT OF, S 1/2 OF. . 1/ OF 11 '45,00 : . 5826 5e.e.- ;
7
12239 148TH SE ,. NE 1/4 'OF SE 1/4 LESS 1 0 FT, . 80 T '6855L 62
4375 t 3756:
RENTON WA 9S055 LES' 'CO RD I 2080 I.
79'T 685 L 500 ' .
I ''1680 38
I ,
I f ,38909
10- 3-05 9027 09,`33 81 T 434 L 5'70
i,
1
BALKO.HENRY
06I .89133
BALKo.HENRY 1.180.14 .1/2 OF. SE 1/4 OF SW- 1/4 OF. I, 3980 8913,
PO BOX 68562 SE 1/4. LESS N 252 FT LESS CO IDS " 1
SEATTLE WA 98188' 1 : 1
102305-9028-05 `' 102}05 9028 09.609 ' 1,81VTi 210e'L :1L130
BEAT T IE JAMES''.& MUNRO 'JOHN. R084 N' 1'0 FT OF' S 360 FT. OF' S 1/2 II I' j ' I ' 3970 '480451 I ,, li,N1,45i, .
12803. NE 141ST Cl OF 1/ 'OF E 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF i pi T _210CL 550, ' d
f. .,
I
I PIA R C E-.L. C 0 Nit I.'N li.E 0 'f.i N. N
1.._ .IL _ _
d LEVY
EX
RL S
ODVALUALIMPLEGALDESCRIPTIONTIONS ,GEN'L.TA7C, SPEC;.S'd? d ' i?t/= t"'AN
f;,.%r L N)MBER %,:An?E&ADDRESS - . - RATE EX .in T CODE
VALUA(
IMPS I_;-.T_
KIRKLAND WA 98033 SW 1/4'•LESS W 175 FT I 17700 . 33494 ' - ' -fi ' 33494
102305-9029-04 10743-05 9029 09.609 81 T 2100 870+ 836 '` 1 . ' 8
LORENSON• H C Z0876 S' 6' FT OF 694 •FT OF W 305 FT. 80 T •2100E a•00.72`1 F , 7Z18, ,..
10901 SE 168TH OF "•W 1/4:OF SW 1/4 LESS; CO RD, 79 T 2100E '•'SO11'8891'` ' . F 8 1',
RENION .WA 98055
1.02305-9030-01" , 10- 3-05 030 09.760 . 81 'T 685sL' .5440i'
2427.'. :.
KEHL JOE H S 1 2 OF N .1/2 OF. NE 1/4 OF I .403## . .'. 21.2 . _
30 MIRAMONTE CT' ,. ' SE /4 LESS N 132 F • LESS S 90 FT -
SAN CARLOS CA 94070 OF " 174 FT LESS CO 'D
102305-9031-00 '
111671
0- 3-05 9031 09.760 81 T 6855E 353 344a r,' 'f 344s3'
PRESSLEY DAVID S N 1 2 OF NE ..1/4 OF SE 1 ''. OF
12407 148TH SE' SE /4 LESS`N 168.05•FT: ' 1 f: ,'
RENTOtJ,WA 98055 E 3 2.15 FT THOF, LESS CO R
102305-9032-09 ' 10 3-05 9032 •.. 09.:.33 81 T 4342•
a
1
4 t# t i14': ''." 141470`
RENTON EAST E 2 OF SE. 1/4 OF SSMT1P4SOP '. 80 1 43401. 'c'r I
7265 E MARGINAL WAY S SW /4 LESS CO RD E
I •h; 131419 13',:i5
SEATTLE WA 98108 CO RAMS LN
102305-9033-08 10-23.-05 ''9033
1.
09.533 8 . T 4342. 19
eM 375r5,i
143' '
FIFER LAURENCE: R .C0479 LOT 3 REVISED KC SHORT PLAT N
14325 SE '125TH, 77 004 AF #7904120866 SD PLAT 8O 1 4342E Q(.,
50E70• 5 ' '
RENION WA 9'8055 OAF S 1/2',OF'.NE 1/4 OF SW-1./4 OF 1 .23,2. :
SE 1/4 LESS'W 160 FT OF N 110r F,T
TH F;.' LESS W 210 FT OF.S 75 FT
TH F'LESS CO Ra I '. .
102305.-9034-07,' ..
I
10 23-05 '. 9034 • 09.53.3 81 T 434i1„ 4 9gL
2 • ' . i 43r,
412163$ '
G M ASSOCIATESC0979, S /2 OF NE.'1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF 0 T 434KL- 2 ,
115 108THAVE NE SW '1/4-LESS W 42 FT :FOR CO RD
2 5-5'035-06f 10 23-OS 9035 09.533 81 T 454 j'S 54815 .
I. 5+815
V..t11C :•MIICRAEL F C0480iE /2 OF SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF 1
4202 SF 12$7H 57 SE 1/4 LESS' E 90 FT OF W 120 FT
i,a i - 980551 OF S 160 FT LESS CO RD 1
73'25-4\ 515-D5 10 23-05 9036'
1
09.533 81 1 1.1341. 19800 ' z,••
vc,:P1177 [,I 1/4:OF
c, 1/2 f1F NI.1 1 ,7, (7r
1 I r,o.tl
r,
Pioneer National
Ti le Insurance Company REAL ESTATE CONTRACT
WASHINOTON TITLC DIVISION
THIS CONTRACT,testis and eataad Into ebb 20th day of August, 1973
trim ROBERT H. LONSDALE, a single man
CD
cep
relnafter celled the- "and John D. Nnnro and James A. Beattie, assTenants in Cocoa
rdnalter called the"purehasr," rAtivatx_'
WITNESSETH:That the seller erne.*sill to the purchaser sad the peke!,pea to por er feet rho ROM Os Wenn
I• , real estat,with the appuetoeoo t,to King CMsitr.bless d weer
the North 110 feet of t1}e South 360 feet of the Nut half of the last half of the
outhweat quarter of thl southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, die
East, W.M. in King County, Washington; EXCIPE the Nest 173 fist thereof. TOOIIlii
ith an easement for ingress and egress 15 feet in width over, across and epee the
following described real estate in King County, Washington: Over thelonth 220 foot
f the West half of the East half of the southwest quarter of the southwest epartar
f Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 last W.M., in King Cotmty, Washingtom,
he centerline of which is defined as follows: Commencing at the southwest commie of
said Section 10; thence South 88' 02' 43U East 821.38 feet; thence North 0' 17' 3266
est 30 feat to the poi t of beginning; thence North 0. 176 32"Nest 220 feet. ,
The terms and conditions of this contract an as follows:1fe pardon pelos Y Sin =VIM 1101 r —
TWENTY AND NO/100 ii 16,820.00 )latlmm l.161
ONE THOUSAND,AND N(/L00 1,000.00 )tlslalna
been paid,the r•.alpt whereof le heel y acknowrdaed,and the herds at add purchase one dig be old as ham
Min HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100 -- RI 150.00 lal
or more at purchaser's option,on or before the •lido O
labs
thda of September 73
and ONE HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100 IS 150.00 bbrsm
or mere at purchaser's option,on orl before the 1'81141 20th day of east aeceaaaa coked*meal ma tY Adana al call
purchase price shall have been fully paid.The purchaser further apes to Wine ee the duke dies babas at sail Saran
7p
at the rate or B per event per aauum from the }SeIQ dal of ALgnat
which Interest dal be deducted train each installment payment and the hOh n e of each wane applied Is redatdes of pladol•
All payments to be made hereunder sl au be made at Pacific Coast Investment Co. 315 Norton Building,
or at such other place as the seller mjjy direct in writing. Seattle, Washington 98104
BUUR ACENONLiDOU/ Till PACT THAT ai i&iNO ON SAID LOT INCROAC81S
NORTHERLY for LIIM.
ES T4 r
Ate pi, ``` 0
5i:l' ,--..?
As referred to in this contract,"date of dosiat"than be—
E
j
I)The purchaser mem and agrees to pay before delrrquency d rase y, bet sbegrantorandgra
hereafter become a lien on mid reel estate;and if by the terms of this at of any mortgage,
contract or other encumbrance,or has mo ==mend of or agreed to purchase le lot'
wp•
M!) ,to now a lien on add
col estate,the pneelnett agree attopaythese before dellaVoary.
21 The Parches?apes,raf0 the Mahan pee it fully paid,to keep , I .,.•ter placed on said real estate
actualtotheaaal ask aka Motet Spiel lea ear&mama by both Are and windstorm In a company acceptable to the seller and for .
the mikes bent,as kin Went any appar,aid to pay ed punkin therefor and to deliver all polities and renewals thereof to
the seller.
l)The perclear nen that AO=pee =of said red Mate km been wade and that neither the seller nor his assigns shall be held
to any cs evaectie the easdden el any improsemenb berme nor Mal the purchaser or seller or the assigns of either be heldtoanycemeaaMSieareaeratfeeahav5ena,`psremob or repay madam the covenant or agreement relied on Is contained herein or is
b.whim awl attacked r madede a pat el this antmri
4)the pare a ammo as at image to et detraction el any improvements now on said real estate or hereafter placed
theme.and et the Col of acid atah amr pm art timed for panic oil.;and agree that no such damage,destruction or taking shall
conic s a teeae el¢wdiaatia sit ease any tagemels•li l elate is tkes dac public see,the portion of the condemnation award
MINN after Sepias of eeaem'el.----a de see aid be pre Is the seller and applied as payment on the purchase
grin keen mars Ow sir deem te'aaer the weber se apply el en a petiw el inch condemnation award to the rebuilding or restore.
inn el
ds of such
i ee seeweft lelaaa alenmelalilleachWaslaamalamemeweaaaeakta+el pa ea to de.sedb s or rebui
Wined wrest,the
iding of such
ingromemmen=bin a saamk!sr sagas presdaae Ada that add psoede Me he grid to the weer for applcatb theofe
winsgemlotthe sae tea Yoder e!apes en edee ibis ts daps ed eta den as Min a,e room paky of Uri inurenre Is
wswderd e....en a eaaima' ____le Iwo w.r. me."sir.. Iaarkas tar per,tt the fan sent
SiTdprnbmeeatenawi•ae`w b moledensaa! e n sinmse so siY:e1s r n el tee wee of deity ad conakaina no
asmeleea era ern the Aitlram
a Ileeraeeown iettaaselsl b en)P4fate..
keen•artlike_ Mi r aim tots et Mb mime the Seem!in en Stoma.or a ee Will the...—,sae kar"ade
ta tit lsemlenkbett moil
ppa eealW eaaairea eeeaM SOPlien nisi te owideere same rib ohms.me am tromp er ein elamen woe!
ha*tasreaaeaee>/ed*lap.Sweep wren les ell crease all Mr pi.r a(At MI to fawn Men is n e/e tell!
01 II -. 'a lkll I.said real dens is subject I.ea ailing contract sr centrals under which ether I.purdadag amid red estate,
or any sow r other eb11 a11aa,width iglu b to PI,ruin area I.calla ouch payments N accordance.,.r,the term,fanol,sad
upon delay ,the parrban:ghat haw the right(silks soy.pymMb Moms'tUt usaw w&kilt,and our poyrrsta we made char
he applied I Ills payments neat(aaat der lhb..Wu mar this ewtrM.,
Mat Islamise Is the punts above a/nlled,to owed,sod
wino,s em inch•M fall the percher prise
deliver to• relator a Wlntary_wama$y_
dud Is rid nal estate.na$loi say gat thereof hereafter
lateen for• .tic use,free of aaabrasas asp say that try attach after de a if doting through ally Ross other thin the udar,sad
subject to following:
of NW mel stele es km al&Mg
and to mu ••
a
differenta
data Is
long as purchaservided forate in delay M M and r.The pry seuruU
to
tap So MIMS/act.Ices lmprria-
mints on • real slate In pad repair and to peak waste and sat M ere,or mash the us she(As emf a his Is,try Mild
purposes purchaser covenants to pay all service,lastalYlba or coarlrrsdla dar/s for water,way el.Wldly.wimp of*es riMiy
services f •• •a aid real state after the datelpurharr Is entitled to peMelaa,
9) ,are:the pnubaaer full to mho any Meals or to.11.1s a tesueac,as Web Mgb ad.IM MNtrotidlert
such pa „ or alert ach laintaw,and any as paid by W oh,,together vllb Mesa at Ito rats f0JIr gar mess Saves
from dale.1 payment all repaid,shall ho by plechasr on aaim's amod,.1 without pigmies to ma NW staid the oils
might ha .by rasoa of such defers%
cols are prism or
110)'ling is of tb moo of thb as •teed it le Mad test I.am the massyIhdl W esI. apU
condition .r agtsaent banal or to oaks any t required hams&pnep*y at the thee tad to Me seem huh en=e
seller may elect to declare all the to hasuoder assisted,and upon IdsIabp ea.v sods fig sea
hereunder nd all Iopawmenta played upon real estate shall hs IorfdW to Se Mkt es dames aid rr Ms Y
have right to re-enter tad tab passion of the state;and no wait:by the Mier of lay dldt tea IN pest of IN Mesa tie
be co. ••as a waiver of any subsequent dataalt.
Servi• upon purchase of all demands,notlai or other papas with napsd to fedelture Mid IMn laOa eel ptdssMy Mils ern/YmadebyoiledStaleMall,palsy pre-pall,Moro teats restated.directed to rho paduNr at W addles Me Mo..s.So Moe.
II) lien seller's election to bring wit to Inform say commit of We aattad.Sddl.g Mt to affect say ppainlraN1hereunder,the purchaser agrees to pay a amenable sum as Mossy's fees ad all cats sad spas to cometlm sales esc Mr..YS
sums shall be included In any Judgment or dccrealentead la such suit.
II the seller shall bring cult to procure an adjudication of the tennlisWa al lhs prdua's ddils hanu.d i.mid'Nd/r.i banentered.tie purchaser agrees to pay a reasonable sum as attoaaaayy's fees and all costs sad spew r teasOfas with sods suit.MildesthereasonablecostofssichingrecordstodeterminethecolonofpuleatthedaissuchMtIsaasaaad.ah(A sew doll be
included in any Wariest or decree entered In such salt.
IN W1TNMSS W HSRItOl';the palls hare o have en cuted this\ -, of the dais flit weYba drew.
1'n D. tit
final .
gs.
Ro.ert
caw
H. nadala
STATE Cf WASHINGTON,
se
A .„
et
r .,. . -..dlsok
County o King f' w a=U.
On this day personally appeare
Or
d belees me Robert H. Lonadale
a
sr
1
to ins b swa to be(hi Individual daalbsd la and who ascuted the within and(ongoing Instrument,and -that
he aped the as hiss free and voluntary act and deed,ter
therein mentioned.
CIY IN under ay bud sod eedal sal this -oan day.( August, 1973
w_......
Notary Public In. ler rill..$WuAlntbn,
V' Ras MUM gigtiau Alf - v
I
W71_Tuts r s. •.
h1-SRI)g'ID AVM
ltegl wmerpa
r,
ie
1o!
f
a ipN
l
l :
1 J
i
s
c. ,, .
e;tg
w
Jla 1p We RerarwM ere!P P4
wassateasear,waawnwww
11101111 mina ims Pion MIN
I ,v •''•
1'
aaa est•IaWtab/Yw,Ow.
Al I.:,
A ; .
T.TY V6t 3-3 3 - Zfroie,
riete \-1,
si .• AsS`'`. , L.1 , N• 1.if , 0 \ 1 ) 1 OA 102 11 1'. In gE . . J 51sop 58711
I,• ,
I. 1_ _ ._ _ , . •
I
58711
77------,\
I--,-----Yr'' ::-A ' N*1\04 0 kVi ...
i. - '
i I
OAN tio ilt.
r,-•
f•it:\A,
I-
WIlIfiffEWI-
T • i SPEC AS Mir' rt)Tni, . ' 1/..vIr
0,4 o
I,----.-
99 699 1111T 210 4 :
1 . : • ' . .
i: ,', ,.\::',:::NIA'ftS ION: M 7A , 1; Of ,,' 140 VT.01 WI:10 FT I . 1 4080.: .6400 . . '7'1 : :
54002 . •
I.::+:.\ ;Vt-,':•:" - .• OV. kb1 ; 41.> Of--Al 1.?A Of NW 1 i OF I ;
tf.,,SS• t.,) HO I
0• r=". 1. ' : . '• ••
INV' ' 912a.
r
533 81 .T •43,4 L 1600 ---I __ ,ka-th<
AON ,-:„. R077/.N1119 VI Of Nt. 14i4 OF SW t4 OF I .50700 --748 1 lo 57411."41
11S1N ST S'44 1 ' Of Nt 1,41 41SS E 1 ‘) FT
a) 3:1 1 '
RENTON WA 9,4tOSS 1ESS. .0 R05
ti • 1,--..
C'• : • ns '
ca' : 1 IgE • :
TC‘2305-94-01 wi.)30, 9s2-5-7 09.604 81 T 210 L• 17600 491- •' ....,' -c 1691
DCNNER LES A E 265 Fir OF S 11V ;FT. 9F N'629 FT 80 T. 210. - 1700 . 7-5,A4..C.-.6 "'..-- 0 5342'
12S-;.9 S E 7;140 "
I .I OF NW 1/4 Of. SW 1/4 SW 1/4. 79 T 210 3000 .'-'533" co 1' 1•1 - 53351 ;
tiENT0N WA ,, 980S5 • 78 T 210 5000
g •77 T. 210 3000 .r4 : tu
76 T 21001 . 1000 . 428" c::t 42851 ; ..
102305-9330-08 . 102;3' S 9330 9.533 81 T 4342L 1-11000
WILSON ANDREW R10711 N 80 FT OF S 160 FT OF W,30 FT . , 1 60900 .685 ,a, - 1 68542 ;
11418 142ND A,N,JE SE OF N 1/2 Or SE 1/4 OF NW 1/ OF
RENTON WA 9110551 NE 1 4 LESS CO RD : .
102305-9332-06 ; : . . • ' 11023 5 ' 9332 09.5' 81 T 434A_. 10300 . • ' ".
1 '
1;2 ONGROLT LLOYD 'C10771S 68 FT OF, N 178 FT OF W 150 U I 64700 ,. 7149 .•. . 71497 .
11414 137TH AVE SE 1)F E 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF
RENTON WA 95955 NW 1 4 LESS W 30 FT,,I.
102305-9333-05 1023g5 9333 . 09.609 8 - T 21004 5900 • 5669
I..
q,,,
t1BEHSEDEANPC05801.1 11 FT OF S 470FT OF 'W.1/2 •
1321 177TH,NE OF
Ei /
2 OF SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4
BELLEVUE WA 98008 LESS W'175 FT 8•LESS E 98 FT OF
1 . . .
273 T OF N 60 FT THOF 1 -
102305-9334-04 102345 9334 09.609 81 T 21401_ 12500 1 12011
LEVY ROBERT E C03781 S 1/ "OF W 1.2 OF E 1/2 OF
307 LYON BLDG '
I, : : -
SW 1 4 OF SW '/4 LESS S 470, FT• 5
607 3RD AVE . . • LESS N 152 FT :IF .S 622 FT' OF W
SEATTLE. WA . 98104 175. 1 THOF ,-
102305-9335-03 • '. .
I •
10-2 -05 , 3.5 ' 09.533 81 T. 43424 • 399 2861',
BRENDEN MARSHALL M C1274 S 30 FT OF W 170..0 'OF N 1/2 80 1' 434iL ' 30q 454f•F " ., , '454, •
18205 SE 128TH OF NE 11/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4. 79 T 4342L .300 I 54 546 • .
RENTON WA 980551 LESS CO RD
1
102305-9336-02 10- 3-05 9336 09.533 81 T. 4154 _0000, • i 111-
DUNCAN CECILIA C1074 N 255 TT OF E 1/2 OF N /2 OF .__ • . I 56800 ' 45377, : 45P7
707 16TH AVE E
I:
NW 11/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SW 1 .4 LESS I
SEAT T LE WA ' 98102 N 115, FT LESS E 176 FT •
102305-9337-01 I 10-23-05
4. . • : ,
9337 0 127S 51 I. 4344 11410
SPIRY W H ' • ' - IN 132 FT OF-W 180. FT OF' SE •:".4 OF . 11 59 ,II .:5024 :. 50245 • .
11808 142ND. AVE SE. ISW 1/4 OF NE. 1/4 LESS CO RD
RENTON WA 98055 . • •• I. I• ' 1 '
1 0 2305-9338-00 I 10-23-05 9338 „09.513 81 T; 4344.: -'-
0.#° I. ; '. . •
WOOD.MERLE J - 7.• 11751E 7I:5 FT OF' W 107.5 FT OF 1 . ,1... 5 st,i s 56054 '.•• •
5605'4 .
12255 142ND AVE SE ' N 124 FT OF S 154 TT OF E 1/2 I 1 '
I
RENTON WA 98055' OF - 1/2.0F SW'1/4.0F NW 1/4 .
1.
I
OF E 1/4.
11-
102305-9339-09 10- 3-05 9339 09..533 811 T• 3424 • "•*
MARLER H E
I '
361276 N 65 FT OF S 115 FT OF E 1/2 OF 1 : . I 5144 7770 -,,..
12251 142ND SE S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF
R. C E L -0 0 1:1 Z.; 1 N I..1 E D ON • N,.
1 - GAL DEISCHIP11-0-N
14 AI I ' I X VG 1 IA101 i 1 00E11 lAt •- --
LL Vir !;11.. 111 -S. li VA
I vnt um 4 \ ' \„.„ s,. „ • ,.--.., ....
LE-
i
WA 98055 SE ' /4 LESS W 185 FT k, LFSS 1 i 1 .
7rTr i
1
Tit!yq
TiaetawseCa,ag y
nsasaeElriDso®eoeremooemers 4 1i
FRFD NM MONO TIECU MT OF
i
rlt.tiL K a <.:ro er r. :Jr3r oG Td.
g 1.'-i\:S.;?• :ICA TITLE a jQ
rrFEN RECORDED• ,• TO SU• •!. ,.(.V\.PHNY
we...._..-`(
r Dls IALJ r ..!::
t._ :e
DIRE.Cr:;c o=,:3R4':
r y+-(r ELECT!f?!i:.
r,rp0 co.mi.
co ,
ioor.es._a.W. . 906 Ll I S.
nePUTY
o
t 5R (er ems.ztt... ='.1 l_r_I R `'e if 1 u 1 _
I, m Statutory Warranty Died
THE t;• ,A LAKELAND INVESTMENT TRUST
for and inr+e,eitte .ticmof Ten Dollars & other valuable consideration
in hand pail,come and warrants to DEAN P. BEHSE and CAROLYN C. BEHSE, his wife,
i;
the following.. .. bed real estate,situated in the County of King State of Waahin gton:
r
The south 65 feet of the North 694 feet of the West 305 feet of
the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 in Section 10, Township23North, Range 5 East, W.M.
I
EXCEPT THE Westerly 40 feet thereof for Union Avenue N.E.
Situate in the Countylof King, State of Washington.
NO/S ALES TAJC
0 E'491327
AUG 181978 o
OF THE COMPTROLLER
tea:•causty.amino.
Dated .iHee A F /4.. ._J,19...78.. A4/,,,gyp /K .4,.,1- 7Z)—
4
STATE WASHINGTON._._._.
STATE OF WASIIINOTON
TA Kin •- • • •.... `
COUNTY OF ___._._.._......_.._._....1 `
On this day personally appeared before me On this of..._._..._. K/,,,... ..
rbeforeme,the undo a No in
a•.__._.
sla .J2.ahalf lo. ,T...
tart Public and fan the ffw..r W..!
Y-ye..
e.._ hytaa,duty commissioned and sworn.Parwraauy apandtomeknowntobetheigaividualdescribdimsad
who executed the wt t dS.g instrument, ,
and
and aclpowiedged that.: `
eregoin
the President and. .Secretary, •
a
Fi Iget,aid t j ntary act and deed
for thn uric,and tiide t
e
corpora,
of
purpoeer., rain mentioned.the rpontian that executed the foregoing intruseanR and eeknov:ledgd
y,the old instrument to be the free end voluntary eel and ded of at
tation,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and WI oath sta ed
ZI,"
r
I
authorised to execute the said instrument and that thesealaids]at,eel this
I
affixed fa the corporate seal of said corporation
a ! . ia7,t. Witnessmy hand and official seal hereto axed the day and year Am! lilceabovewritten.
N
Notary Public in and for the Stab of Waetdngkvt,
leo..
otary
residing
Public i
rn
and for the State of Wig&
t
residing at
oa
I
r.na wwu a...Me
a_
d .
t --
a,
mealZ `"" r
c,
ci
M0
savewus ars,va
PIONEER NATIONAL
Y;,
TITLE INSURANCE ENTHISSPACERESED REC ORDER'SCORDER'S USE. - -
A11Cn5 COMPARV
Filed for Record at Request of
t.o
Ci
7 I AFTER RECORDING MAIL
Tr
t-,
c., ,
U2. o
z
as JAMS R. BEATTIE l
1 12803 N.E. 141st Ct..
K rkl nd, W 98033
rig
1
ti
5ii
d FORM L58F
O Statutory Warr ty Deed
as
r THE GRANTOR ROBERT E. LEVY And GERIRUD S. LEVY, his wife
i
o !mend inconsideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and sufficient consideration
in hand conveys and warrants to I J B. BEATTIE and L y ^wife, the following 1
described real estate situate the County of Rf—,State o as on: I
THE SOUTH 470 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1 2 0 EAST 1/2 OF'THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP23Ili! NORTH, RANGES EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE.WEST 175
O FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 360 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE EAST 98
FEET OF THE NORTH 60 FEET THEREOF.
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT 15 FEET IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITIES -
ACROSS, OVER AND UPON THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, TIlE
i
CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH
88°02°43" EAST 821.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0°17'32" WEST 42 FEET TO THE
7 q
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE MORTH 0°17°32" WEST 580 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF I,
SAID LINE; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED IN THE HEREINABOVE
OESCRIBEO•MAIh T_RACT._ (T IOr 333E IN SECTION 10, S VNSHIP 23 NORM, RANGE 5 EAST W.M.)i
This deed is given In fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between the parties hereto. jII
dated June 7, 197g , and conditioned for the conveyance of the above
described property,and the covenants of warranty herein contained shall not apply to any title,
interest or encumbr4nee arising by.through or under the purchaser In said contract, and shall not
apply to any taxes, assessments or other charges levied. d or becoming due subsequent
to the date of aald contract.
Real Estate Excise Tax was paid on this sale or stamped exempt on June 9, 1978 , Rec. No. E-477848
Dated this 51.1 day of November, 1978
STATE OF WI""`"• Seal
KING
County of Seal)
t.
On thi, 5th
day of Novelther, A.'D. 19._., under- i
signed,a Notary Public i and for the State of Washington ed
and sworn,personally api eared Robert E. Levy
t
c', ./
lv
to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the foregoing inatrmsot for nd
as attorney Ia tact of Gertnld S. Levy. his wife also therein desertted,and ac • • •• I ". that
eta aitnad awed witledlthe sane MI.
his
voluntary act and deed and as the free and 1 ' • US •deed '
of the MildQet- --- Ievy for the uses and ptrposes therein 51 ,dotMJ;'aeon oath
stated that
j
t of trtorneyastbririnstrumenttheexecutionofthistrumeetlamsotbeesrevokedwalks(the said
sex uwS. bevy O.ow l.,eg.
VITN isealaatLewdmeiatialsbereft nixed the day . . ! ton • ,.. a e - -'
a.maws i1'.Fii;S llridttstalf
go IL nr ft s at Ifel:erne
1
Ii
L 3E 'Staimaelegamaux byffi cc:s J__...c-r.-. -•Fa—. Yw+r.-Fr_.orm:TI3e temarrr_e
QLOAAK a 1Ni W .lAM NACHTMAN WAYNE C 7 19
ill
7 —
1114
7
6
1 i
ZPT DIV MO B J D123577 w--t173cPT'EZt_T DEDWAR BAKER DONNA MARIE PIELE ROBERT M 713;
PT•F'LT2 DEDWAR BAKER DONNA MARIE PIELE'LESSTER LEON7PTLT3 - MTG FI LAURENCE R+ FARMERS &,MERCHAN 1 • .:1 '
M LUCRs BANK .
y RC LUCAS BK/W
1 1 $ ` .; -1`,
s' 5 ? DT LUCAS BK/W 1'1
1Az .
C LUCAS ' DOVE119cQDEDQCLBANKWESTLUCAS,CHARLES F
4 ,,, 0DDREL DICKAWEST •DICKA'CHARLES F rk
2, ,
ilh5e= 9' DEDWAR DICKASON NOLAN E+ KING—COUNTY GOVT
4
1977:
ti; 2 3 5 , `
7
2t' CON DICKASON NOLAN E ALDER GROVE 7
75879.. .EZ AC PCICOLONSDti59UEZC'• LONSD t
t
i, z 5 EZ 1.)-. PCICO
MUNRO
L696D-. I 1
g
1
sz ti
1
1
t3 5 9' DV' MUNRG D5
DIV MUNRO J D
6b77J
M
1 7 `
t r - 1 5 9' 21 EZ •EXC SHERIFF
i3 z I, EZPT DEDQCL DISHNOW JAY V JR LEVY ROBERT E
o2354EZPTDEDWARCEARLEYMAUDELAPLANTELLOYDP 4 •
y}.• EZPT TDD LAPLANTE LLOYD P. UNITED SAVINGS LN r'i% 3 5 9!]4' EZPT DEDWAR LEVY ROBERT E+GER BEATTIE JAMES R r1;,, 54•, DEDWAR LORENSON H C LAKELAND INVESTME .
DEDWAR•LAKELAND_INVESTME-BEHSE°DENI P-',
1'I i3
5
y? St1 MI6 . KEHL Jut M+Lt1MA WM ir,,iuv Ltrlfrw ...1'`I 3 5 '3' D TINSL TINS
TO,
II
rES L
J PT MTr, EC LUVD DARVIN D+.DjRAL,FINANCE CO G;
1L1 C5 . r
PT DEDWAR GULF OIL CORP , B/W
1rt. 4
5 90 ' DEDWAR ZIVONOV LUBO.(HEI RENTON EAST 11
I
TDD ALKIRE DORYS G M.ASSOCIATES jilt. . 7
PT&EZ DEDWAR WARNES SUELLEN SCHNEIDER JOHN E
i 1
7!. • ' ' ',1
AC. DELVA GRPNA ' 1 ' 5073i^ ,l I. / •5
r
AC DELVA OVER_ 1 Q [ 5 I
a
D • GRAHA VALLrEE1.I 23 5 3 DV OVERL SCD41 1
i:;.
C4-`
H 5 DDVVOOpVER SCCDq4 1
1 7 i4-5
I ..$
DEDWAR.PMB LASEN G.
I P4
CON OVERLY CHRISTOPHE G M ASSOCIATES•
D LA141 DICKA
i 4 f
PT&EZ TDD SCHNEIDER,JOHN E+ PACIFIC WEST MTG .
EZ C. LESH .HERTE
tII9': EZ C LESH HERTE
1 EZ MTG HERTEL h1 J SOUND VENDING RET
i,
I EZ DEDWAR LESH LILLIAN RUTH HERTEL MICHAEL J 1Z ) ktl
I
9'93. PT EZ,'" TDD : SARGENT DON.ALD L+ COMMUNITY BAN: RE , l `.•
1•l
s D ROWAN HHEIRST
J LL 1 71VDIVREEDHJU795di :J4 5 ii.J21I,9—'Sl,.
r
C 2- ACREAGE FIRST A+"•tERICAN TITLE COMPANY ,KING COUNTY 0JLf29/8 '. .i 4sE :
C(' PZ1 RNG G+}V/PA'CEL OTR PLO TYPE 1ST PARTY 2ND PARTY DATE ' DON)L OANTeP.E
9u 9 . .PF 0 1 . .ST11q( ICJ Via'r 9 9 PF 12 .1 1F+49 1.1 35 L
i
9.%0 UDI DEDQCL.COi ASURDG.D J • BRIERE F J • 6 197,,55
pS4'CON 'BRIERE.FRANCIS;J+ BRIERE JAMES F 1 '1977`
v , AGRWTR BRIERE F
U+P EZ G P BYERSDjRFER G P SARGEANT D & r Lf
ti PT C WILSO BE L 1N rf>l
d 4' DT BELL FS
19zr4, - .. D- WILSO BELL 1 1 77 ' .
EZPT • D'. t1UTSC ROTH .' 1 197‘ ' . •
EZPT,
DT
ROTH PIONS .. r. r74,, J 1 .
Z '.-ef p+ SC GULLI IN3148 4
7 (ii
u8--, e
4„' DT BELL G F AMYL IN Al INf S ,
r
Y R gg
7TDDRELBELLG7501L4:J)J7 1 i 7i .,),`,. 1„,.;.i
rit r ,i, 7At •rr, '`,, ',
P, ')77 ;''q
v
i.
101 ,
1 _
97.127F, 61 T 685 li, 1 '19_1 .
2 . .. , •F.__30 - - 2273, -:,----- , . .
N 17 11T V. IA, ' t. A t!ISi'
31
IN ,-..::\ 4t0 WO. 1 X41,91 PIIT1AhkY /I ' •. „
9022 09.760 81 T 685L 3410 3328
1/:•Of N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF
2.\:: ,,..:',1'.4 :-11. •N 1/ Or E 1/2 OF SE 1/4 .LESS CO • • il • (:1 \,, '.•
VON tA i8i)S":5' .R0 t oaLt POR PAR1IALLY EX k•,..
UNDE.' I‘CW 84.36.381 THRU' .389 • '
NOT INCLUDED I •
1
1 .• I ,• - - 1 .
3-23-05
N '
9023 07.127S 81 .1 685-L 10.051
N 1/2 OF 1/2 OF N.1/2 OF •1 2 2708 , 1 Z7Vi3.
S,E NE.1 4 OF SE-•1/4 LESS CORD , '
Ri.:NWN WA. 9,6055 l'AX POR PAR EX UND CH 288 LAWS(•
1 0F1, 71
05-4023-83 10-2 -05 9023 09.760 81 T 6854L •34100 .332,3 ' ' - '(• 332.84
VI HILL RALPH N 1/2 OF'N 1/2 OF N .1/2 OF • .,.
1.1_1:7:013 148TH AVE SE I NE 1 4 OF SE 1/4 LESS CO RD I • • 1'( . ' '':
RENTaN WA 98055i TAX POR PAR EX UND CH 288 LAWS .1" '
10F 1/71 NOT INCL
1 I ''
102305-9024--09 10-2 -.05 9024 09.533 81 T434241. 25••• ., • , . •-.-
1 . , . , : (
BA'...KO HENRY •1180E 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 Of 1 1 101111 .. 12106 . -'.• • • 121069 ."
f -P0.60X 68562 . _ SE 144 LESS N 210 FT LESS i
1 ; •
SEATTLE WA 98188 S 220 FT LESS.CO RD
F ..L. •
162:505-9025-08 10-2 -05 ( ... 9025 • 09.533 61 Ti 4344... 1000
PIELE LEONARD L R0379.101 REVISED KC SHORT PLAT a I. t 1 - 169oo • -26502 ":. . 265021 :
14309'SE 125TH ST 7760 4 AF /7904120866 SD PLAT .1 •{' - - ' .'
RENTON WA 98055 OAF . 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF SW 1/4..OF 1 1 1 '.• ' '
SE 1 4 LESS W 160 rr OF N 110 FT '. :. 1
THOF g LESS W 210 fILOF S 75 FT i
THOF LESS CO RD
1 ! 1 1
i 1 ! ( ' • i -
102305-9026-07 • 10-23-05 ' 9026 09.760 1111'166551 14700 . I
DOVE BUD D 1 E 230 FT OF S 1/2 Of S 1/2OF : i ,_ '1 4. 4** 1 562471 . 5.82671
12239 148TH SE 1 NE 1'.4.OF SE 114 LESS S 130 FT .( 180,.t 66551 • ..4,4! .
7 . -" . -
RENTON WA 98055( LESS CO RD • . 43756i . F : . -4.35il,:
Ili 1' 6855l . 1+4+1 • • : ' • • ' ' •I
1. tei . *4°4. - . ; IF :. • 38909,,
34 WM
f
102305-9027-06 10-2 -05 9027 69.533 411 I 421 , j . . : : ' . , .,,,',7.7'
a ALKO HENRY , 11801W 1/4
OF SE 1/4 OFF SW 1/4 OF i • , 1, ' 59DIPU ' 89131 ' ' ' .. 07Y). .
PO BOX 68562 SE. 1 4 LESS,F1-252 FT,LESS CO MS:,
SEATTLE,WA ' ' ' ' 9818.a :.
102305-9028-05 ' - 102315 I 9028 09.40, .en iziOni . 14 4*
BEATTIE JAMES & MURRO JOHN R084, N 11* FT OF S 360 FT OF S 1/214"' , ( 1 , - 1 i • : 4804 , 48045 ' (.
12803 NE 141ST CT OF 1/2 OF E 1/2 OF .SW 1/4 OF ,80 It 21001: 5 4 i'
P'A ft (ft - CO N11..1 N 6 E 0 0 % ,':Pi
LEVY 5R at S LEVY VALUATOIS 'GEN"''TAX [.SPEC AS'AT . -'TC“'A:. • .,..;43.
NI•V,,.0 \AV &aDn-.;....SS i Ltc,,t,_laEscRri.--not% '
RATE EX ,VS! T , CCOE LON°I IMPS • :., •
I in.i. '," . 3349KIRKLANDWA9803VSW1ILESSW175FT
to . ,
0 , ,
102305-9029-04 36010-2 -05 9029 09.609 ••811 T 21s* 67'11 • '§360- .'
LORENSON H C ' Z0876!.S 65 FT OF N 694 FT OF 111 305 FT - "f,T 2100jL . Ili . . .721a • ' IF • • 218 .• . :
10901 SE 1681.14 , - I:OF S 1/4 OF SU' 1/4 LESS CO R11 .•, .79,T.2100L ill .' '88911 - •• "F ': 8891!
RENTON WA 98055.
1 10-23-05 - • 9030 69.70v 81 T 685 544'' • j- .r,
102305-9030-01
KEHIi. JOE H 1 S 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF Pt 1/4 OF ._ 1 I 40 .1 -9242 1 . . 1
30 M1RhJONTE CT SE 114 LESS N 132 FT LESS S 90 F . 1 1 - • , .
1 , SAN CARLOS CA • . 94070 OF E 174•FT LESS CO RD
1
1
I : ; 1 ' •
I 02305-9031--00 10-27-05 9031 09.760 181 T 685L 3531i 34451
PRESSLEY DAVID S - ' Pi 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF
12407 1.48TH SF SE 1 4, LESS N 168.05 FT OF I •REN1ON %Jik 98055 E 30 .15 FT THOF LESS CO RD
102305-9032-09. . 10-2 5 . .' 9032 09.533 , 811 T 434 ( 12,20
l •
141470eivF.N1ON EA,ST ' ' E -./ OF SE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF I '1 254.1 t .14147
77(..,5 E MARGINAL WAY S . . ' SW 1 4 (LESS CO RD. ESMY- P S ,P g,0801 i .434 L 850** , .' . H1.1;1419 •,.-1
r,
i mF. .,0„ 98108 CO I ARS IN: . - •1 1800: 13141
1f,, 1
a
I M
NCO
j U.
ALTA OWNER'S POLICY
NA1).. -, , ,
FORM B - 1970
AMENDED 10-17-70)
0z861
s I
dW4tlL.
Ill AI) 3.1 al ill , ;
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ivolNaa do ktoa
issued by •
SA ECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
SUBJE T TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN
SCHED LE B AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF,
SAFEC TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, herein called the Company,
insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the
amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which
the,Co pany may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by
reason f:
1 Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated
therein;
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title;
3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land; or
4 Unmarketability of sucf title.
In Witness Whereof, SAFECO Title Insurance Company has caused this policy to be signed
and sealed by its duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A.
liveoiQaonsof .ltiW
Secretar President
f.
TP-58 R1 2/79
PRIINTED IN U.S.A.
I
z. tronttnuauon or Ins ranee after Con- '
iilsuieu, Is relectea as unmarketable. If such
ceeding, in effecting settlement, 'securing evi-
veyance of Title ompt notice shall not be given to the
obtaining
witnessesor ,proceeor pdrosecutinging, andthoreiimpany, then as to such insured all liability nding suchactionThecoverageofthispolicyshallcontinueinoftheCompany_ shall cease and terminate_ r?_
SCHEDULE A
Policy No.: 452375
Premium: $ 1 ,284.00
Amou t of Insurance: $550,000.00
Date of Policy: January 29, 1982 at 8:00 a.m.
1 . Name of Insured:
DEL:ERT C. BENNETT and BETTE A. .BENNETT, husband and wife
2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is
covered by this policy is:
FEE SIMPLE
3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy
ve ted in:
IDI .0 PATAS and TOULA PATAS, his wife
4. The land referred to in this policy is in the State of Washington,
Co my of King, and is described as follows:-
SEE EXHIBIT "I" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
Policy No. 452375
EXHIBIT "I"
PARC sL A
The orth`L2,00 feet of the East half of the East half of the Southwest
quar er of the Southwest quarter, Section 10, Township 23 Nortr Range 5I
East W. M. , it King County, Washington; e-.
EXCE'T the West 1'30, feet thereof.
t"
PARCEL B
ge
the Northeast quarter of the,,,Northeast qua- ter of the Southwest quarter
of uhe Southwest quarter, Sect'ioon 10,,T"ownship 23 North, Range 5 East,
W. . , in King County, Washington;
EXC:PT the North 200 feet;
r ,
EXC:PT the West 130 feet.µ ,,,
o''' PAR' EL C
Vim.
T•.The South three fourths of the East half of the East h'al:f, of the
Southwest qua ter of the Southwest quarter, Section 10,,_ Township 23 North, Range
51 East, W.,M. , in King County,
Washington; EXC PT,the South 42 feet conveyed to King County under King
County°',,.,Re •rding Nos. 5738287 and
5738289.
1I PAR EL 0 Cfti....9i3IL.': Aie-Vi L..
r')The South 250 feet of the West half of the East half of the
Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range
5 East, W. M. , in King County,
Washington; EXCEPT the West 175
feet;EXCEPT the South 42 feet conveyed to King County under King
County Recording No.
5738286.
s
SCHEDULE B
1
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
This policy:doe- not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following:
1) Encroachm-nts or questions of location, boundary and area, which an accurate survey may disclose; public or private
easements, streets, roads, alleys or highways, unless disclosed of record by recorded Plat, conveyance or dec iee of a
Court of record; rights or claims of persons in possession or claiming to be in possession, not disclosed by the public
records; m.terial or labor liens or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not disclosed by the public records;
water right or matters relating thereto;any service,installation or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity or
garbage co lection and disposal.
2) Reservatio s and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;right of use,control or
regulation ny the United States of
America in the exercise of power over navigation;any prohibition or limitationon the
use,occup:ncy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any,waters
which'may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water.
3) General to es not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same
becoming : lien.
FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS SEE ATTACHED
Washingto )
ALTA Own is Policy Form B-1970
Standard overage)
TP-62 1/79(Wa hington)
I
Poli y No.452375
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS:
1
11. Easement including the terms, covenants, and provisions thereof,
as granted by instrument
Recorded: November 23, 1910
Recirding No.: 717661
Records of:King County, Washington
For Telegraph lines
Aff:cts: Along the roads, streets and highways adjoining said
premises the exact location undescribed
2. Easement including the terms, covenants, and provisions thereof,
as oi sclosed and establi shed by instruments
Recorded: December 5, 1941 and October 7, 1943, respectively
Recsrding Nos. : 3208139 and 3340140, respectively
Rec.rds of:King County, Washington
For: Roadway
Aff-cts: Easterly 7.5 feet of Parcel D and other property
1
3. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
Pas reserved by instrument
Recorded: November 15, 1943
Re ording No.: 3348472
Re•ords of:King County, Washington
In favor of: A. B. GRAYSON AND IRENE GRAYSON, his wife
jFo : The right to install county water pipe line and use
of the reserved portion for private road
Af ects: East 15 feet of Parcel C lying within the South half
of the North half of the East half of the East half
of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.
M. , in King County, Washington
4. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
fo electric transmission and/or distribution line, together with
ne essary appurtenances, as granted by instrument
Re orded: December 22, 1944
Re ording No.: 3436380 .
Re ords of:King County, Washington
To: PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY 1
Affects: Parallel and adjacent to West line of Parcel D
5. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
a - granted by instrument I
R:corded: June 5, 1946
R:cording No.: 3575604
R:cords of:King County, Washington
Continued)
in.,,,,
Polly No. 452375
In f.vor of: THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY
For: Telephone line with necessary poles and
appurtenances
Af fe, ts: An undisclosed portion of Parcels A, B and C
6. Easement incl udi ng the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
as g anted by instrument
Recorded: June 5, 1946
Recording No.: 3575605
Records of:King County, Washington
In favor of: THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY
F,or: Telephone line with necessary poles and
a ppu rtenances
Affects: An undisclosed portion within the East 148.19 feet
of Parcel D
71. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
for electric transmission and/or distribution line, together with
necessary appurtenances, as granted by instrument
Recorded: July 8, 1953
Recording No.: 4360935
Records of:King County, Washington
To: PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
Affects:
Within 1 foot of the East line of Parcels A and B
8. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
for electric transmission and/or distribution line, together with
necessary appurtena ces, as granted by instrument i
Recorded: July 8, 1953
Recording No.: 4360936
Records of:King County, Washington
To: PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
Affects: Within 1 foot of the East line of Parcel C lying
within the South half of the North half of the East
half of the East half of Section 10, Township 23
i North, Range 5 East, W. M. , in King County,
Washington
19. Easement including the terms, covenants, and provisions thereof,
la s created by i ns trUme nt
Recorded: December 5, 1955
Recording No.: 4643925
Records of:King County, Washington
For: Roadway
Affects: Westerly 7-1/2 feet of Parcel D and other property
Continued)
1
i
i
Policy No. 452375
10. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
as reserved by instrianent
Recorded: March 5, 1956
Recording No.: 1669492
Records of:King County, Washington
In favor of: ALFRED GRAYSON AND IRENE GRAYSON, husband and wife
For: Roadway
Affects: he East 15 feet of the South 66 feet of Parcel B
11. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
a's reserved by i ns trtane nt
Recorded: July 8, 1958
Recording No.: 4919247
Records of:King County, Washington
Ian favor of: ALFRED GRAYSON AND IRENE GRAYSON, husband and wife
For: roadway
Affects: The East 15 feet of the South 135 feet of Parcel C,
12. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof, ,
for electric transmission and/or di stribution.line, together with
necessary appurtenances, as granted by instrument
Reccrded: October 6, 1965
Reccrding No.: 5937351
Records of:King County, Washington
To: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
AffEcts: rJndisclosed portion of Parcels A and B lying North
of the South 66 feet of Parcel B and West of the
Last 15 feet of Parcels A and B
13. Easement including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof,
a s reserved by i ns tnume nt
Recorded: October 29, 1965
Recording No.: 5947062
Records of:King County, Washington
In favor of: IRENE GRAYSON
For, Ingress, egress and utilities 1
Affects: East 15 feet of Parcel C
The following coven•nt is recited on the face of said instrument:
i
All rights under this easement shall terminate when grantors herein have
dedicated, canplet and improved a county or city roadway extending in
a Northerly and Sou herly direction connecting Southeast 128th with the
East half of the East half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest
quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W. M. , in King
County, Washington.
Continued)
ws-ate:-
I
Policy No. 452375
14. Easement including the terms, covenants, and provisions thereof,
as created by instruments
Recorded: September 1 , 1965 and October 29, 1965
Recording Nos. : 5922910 and 5947064, respectively
Records of:King County, Washington
For: Ingress, egress and utilities
Affects: North 15 feet of Parcel A
145. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said
premises, as granted in instrument
Recorded: May 20, 1964
Recording No.: 5738286
Records of:King County, Washington
To: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Affects: arcel D
1:6. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said
p,reni ses, as granted in instrument
Recorded: ay 20, 1964
Recording No.: 1738287
Records of:King County, Washington
To: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Affects: Parcel C
1,7. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said
prerri ses, as granted in instrument
Recorded: May 20, 1964
Recording No.: 5738289
Records of:King County, Washington
To: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Affects: Parcel C
18. Deed of Trust to secure performance by DELBERT C. BENNETT AND BETTE
ANN BENNETT of the Exercise of Option - Patas Property entered into
between FAIRFIELD DEVELOPMENTS, INC. and BENNETTS on or about August 10,
198" , as well as all loans made by FAIRFIELD DEVELOPMENTS, INC. to
Bennetts arising out of or relating to Patas property, and any interest,
advances, or other obligations secured thereby;
Dated:August 10, 1981
Recorded: August 24, 1981
Recording No.: 8108240458
Records of:King County, Washington
Grantor: DELBERT C. BENNETT AND BETTE ANN BENNETT
Trustee: TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation
Beneficiary: FAIRFIELD DEVELOPMENTS, INC.
Continued)
Pol i i y No. 452375
19. General taxes for the year 1982, not payable until February 15,
1982, in an amount not yet available fran the Comptroller's office.
Affe ts: Parcels A, B, C, and D
Tax `ccount Nos. : 102305-9207-07, 102305-9323-07, 102305-9100-06, and
102305-9322-08, respectively
20. Contract of Sale, including the terms, covenants and provisions
ther-of, and the effect of any failure to canply with such terms,
covenants and provisions.
Dat-i :January 21 , 1982
Recorded: January 28, 1982
Rec.rdi ng No.: 8201280284
Sell- r: DINO PATAS and TOULA PATAS, husband and wife
Purc aser: DELBERT C. BENNETT and BETTE A. BENNETT, husband andr
wife
Excise Tax Receipt No.: E-0665820
epb vmh
r -.. 3<7 . ad •" KL. '•-. «}t - , 1,
4;.,. t
i...+, u
a._
r,n i'''' ,"'V,4r `L,y'
1.
i it' W' a ':-.
4•, y
Y
w
AA
IIII
f„, J
OWNER'S INFLATION PROTECTIVE INDORSEMENT NO. 3
The Company, recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property valuation and intending to provide
additional monetary protection to the Insured Owner named in said Policy, hereby modifies said Policy,' as follows:
1. Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary, the amount of insurance provided by
said Policy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual upward adjustments in the man-
ner and to the extent hereinafter specified.
2. "Adjustment Date" is defined, for the purpose of this Indorsement, to be 12:01 a.m. on the first January 1
which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy, as shown in Schedule A of the Policy to which
this Indorsement is attached and on each succeeding January 1.
a. An upward adjustment (will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates, as defined above, by it creasing the
s maximum of insurance provided by said Policy (as said amount may have been increased theretofore
under the terms of this Indorsement) by the same percentage, if any, by which the United States De-
I artment of Commerce Composite Construction Cost Index (base period 1967) for the month of September
immediately preceding exceeds such Index for the month of September one year earlier; provided, however,
that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall never exceed 175% of the amount of insurance
stated in Schedule A of said Policy, less the amount of any claim paid under said Policy which under the
terms of the Conditions and Stipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual
adjustment in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Construction Cost Index.
4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under.said Policy, the amount of insurance in force shall
be deemed to be the amount which is in force as of the date on which the insured claimant first learned of
x the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as of the date of receipt by the Company of th'e first notice
of such claim, whichever shall first occur.
g Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said Policy.
This indorsement is made 1 part of said Policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and stipulations there-
in, except as modified by the provisions hereof.
s°
Dated: January 29, 1982 at 8:00 a.m.
I Policy No. 452375
i
1
i
e t ,°A.4A, 'II.
RL 1/
10
a, f SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
e/A.
c--
472)4voit.x.l.tk
1 t\\
Z x '
By
Authorized Signature
t-..-..., ---..-‘.,-..!.'-‘, ..:•---....... oi- • - '*
l•-• '''''''• '' " '1..r '7ei-A-...›„Aii..7....
0, .
10.,le," '."4,..t.,4. .e,i+ .•.-,""**-;'`-''".41''''• ' ':''-'''''' - '
3-.7E,,"4"."-"?'",'e,'',:.S.•••2".' ': ' '
WIIn regrence to streets and other parcels.While it is believed tobe4.'.0.8oiowii 1..3 ... ..
1....
1.... var-rarrer
correct, the Company assumes no liability for any loss occurring by reason of reliance thereon. ,_ ..
7 -- 7
SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
SW4 SW4 SECrION 10-Twp 23N. —F'5,E. V.M.
1---zoo•-±
IZ99 Za '4-
1 i a
I tc,
k___
I t
i
W
SWA.Sw* :
I3o' 5sc-10
3 %
1
NisW
N
t1
i
Qi
1'Z
71 t,i‘,
k o l'-•••
1
01_
4' .Z+-
1
265 '
44 1 Ca
tiof i•
i.. _.• _. _._Z75' go 0i.t.5-3,-4 oF 040 FIN-I 17.0•
ri
E..1/z 52/z.
RS
H •
I 4''
i I.1 /49't '
250' 1/
1 1,1.i_n1.9c j
f /4 I 5.470'Z'
0 .. -tp
4— /
75 __J..,••,•-•
5.435'
1 s.46o.7
52
i
7 A
N
1 I I
I49.4_
Ate
ceigsido -
47
1--
p-i ,CY
3rif•
30 40 111 1 I
o • k I/I zio/1t •°I-
N I
t__
5.E. /2.8-th 5-r:
5 -- —•
N NI
4-
1292.86'4_' f
4
cio
I
I
m
PIONEER NATIONAL.
I TITLE INSURANCE
ATICOR COMPANY
1 A L.
Policy of Title Insurance1
SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE PROVISIONS
OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY (a Stock Clo mpany);
a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss
or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys' fees and expenses which
the Company ;may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of:
1 1
1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein;
il i
R /ECE 01
ronl
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; nn
3. Lack of a right of accegs to and from; the land; or nMAR191982
4. Unmarketability of'such title;
I DUtL tNG/zUN,NG DEPT.
This policy shall lot-be valid or binding until countersigned below by a validating officer of the Company.
1
1i Pione-
r National Title Insurance ompany
by
esident
ii
Attest: It.. L&2
Countersigned:Secretary
11
By
Validating Signatory
1!
08
Nt
TO 1690 PNTI(10-79)American Land Title Association Owner's Policy—Form B—1970(amended 10-17-70)
CAT.NO.NN00463
Conditions and Stipul.tions Continued and Concluded on Last Page of This Policy)
DISKETTE NO: 76 JO , .
ALTA - B
NUMBER : A-270869
DATE : FEBRUARY 11 , ; 1981 AT 8:30 AM
AMOUNT : S35,000.00
PREMIUM: S182.75
SCHEDULE A
1. NAfNE OF INSURED
MULTIV', EST LTD. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION
2. TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST COVERED BY THIS POLICY AT THE DATE
HEREOF IS VESTED IN:
ROBERT E. LEVY AND GERTRUD S. LEVY, HUSBAND AND WIFE
3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS
SCHEDULE COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS:
FEE SIMPLE ESTATE
4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF
KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5, EAST,
W.M. ,j; IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 622 FEET OF T E WEST
175 FEET, AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH 470- FEET THEREOF.
TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS 15 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS,
OVER AND UPON THE WEST 1/2 OF ' THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, THE CENTERLINE OF
WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS ,FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH 88' 02'43" EAST 821.38 FEET; THENCE NORTH O' 17'32"
WEST42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH O' 17 ' 32" WEST 580
FEET . YO THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF INCLUDED IN
THE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED MAIN TRACT.
A-270869 PAGE 1
SCHEDULE B
DEFECTS LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER MATTERS AGAINST WHICH , THE
COMPANY DOES NOT INSURE:
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS
1
1. GEN: RAL TAXES FOR YEAR 1481
AMOUNT S120. 11
WHICH C NNOT BE PAID UNTIL: FEBRUARY 15, 1981
BEING' CIUNTY TREASURER' S PARCEL NO. 102305-9334-04
2. TER S, CONDITIONSIAND COVENANTS, AND THE EFFECT OF ANY FAILURE TO
COMPLY HEREWITH, CONTAINED IN CONTRACT OF SALE:
SELLE1R ROBERT E. LEVY AND GERTRUD 'S. LEVY, HUSBAND AND WIFE
PURCHAS: R MULTIVEST ' LTD. , A WASHINGTON CORPORATION
DATED! JANUARY 29, 1981
RECORDED FEBRUARY 11, 1981
AUDITOR S FILE NO. : S{102110258 '
RECEIPT NO. E-625824
3. AN : ASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE
PURPOSE ', STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES.
FOR i INGRESiS AND EGRESS
RECOR1OED DECEMB'ER 7, 1955 AND DECEMBER 16, 1955
AUDITOR S NO.: 4643925 AND 4646881
AFFECTS THE WEST 7.5 FEET OF SAID PREMISES AND OTHER .LAND
4. AN : ASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR T E
PURPOSE . STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES.
FOR POLE1L1INE RIGHT-OF-WAY
RECORIDE o NOVEMBER 23, 1910
AUDITOR S ' NO. : 717661
5. AN ASEMENT AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR THE
PURPOSE . STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES.
FOR j POLE LiINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
RECORDED JUNE Si, 1946 r -
AUDITOR S NO.: 357560'15 AND 3575606 .
AFFECITS OVER AND ACROSS SAID PREMISES AND OTHER LANDS '
6. AN : ASEMENT -AFFECTING THE PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AND FOR T E
PURPOSE:- STATED HEREIN, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES.
FOR i ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE .
RECOR1DEU DECEMBER 22, 1944
AUDITOR S NO.:' 3436380 AND 3436388
AFFECTS OVER SAID PREMISES AND OTHER LANDS
7. RIG T TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON SAID PREMISES
IN CONFIIRMITY WITH STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY
II
A-2708 9 PAGE 2
u _. _ .._
PURPOSES, AND TO THE SAME EXTENT AS IF THE RIGHTS GRANTED HAD BEEN
ACQUIRED BY CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER STATUTE OF THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON, AS GRANTED BY DEED.
AUDITOR ' S NO.: 5738286
GRANTED TO : KING COUNTY
AFFECTS EASEMENT PROPERTY
STANDARD EXCEPTIONS:
A. ENCROACHMENTS OR QUESTIONS OF LOCATION, BOUNDARY AND AREA, WHICH
AN ACCURATE SURVEY MAY DISCLOSE.
B. PUBLIC OR PRIVATE EASEMENTS, STREETS, ROADS, ALLEYS OR HIGHWAYS,
UNLESS
DISCLOSED
OF RECORD BY RECORDED PLAT OR CONVEYANCE, OR DECREE
OF A COURT OF RECORD.
C. RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF PERSONS IN POSSESSION, OR CLAIMING TO BE IN
POSSESSION, NOT DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
D. MATERIAL OR LABOR LIENS, OR LIENS UNDER THE WORKMEN' S COMPENS TION
ACT NOT DISCLOSED BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
E. WATE' RIGHTS OR MATTERS RELATING THERETO.
F. ANY ERVICE, INSTALLATION OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER,
WATER;, :LECTRICITY OR GARBAGE REMOVAL.
G. EXCEPTIONS AND RESERVATIONS IN UNITED STATES PATENTS.
H. GENE' AL TAXES NOT $IOW PAYABLE; MATTERS RELATING TO SPECIAL
ASSESSM:NTS AND SPECIAL LEVIES, IF ANY, PRECEDING THE SAME BECOMING
A LIEN.
I. RIGH OF USE, CONTROL OR REGULATION BY THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA IN THE EXERCISE OF POWERS OVER NAVIGATION.
J. ANY ' ROHIBITION OR LIMITATION ON THE USE, OCCUPANCY OR
IMPROVE ENT OF THE LAND RESULTING FROM THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC OR
RIPARIA OWNERS TO USE ANY WATERS WHICH MAY COVER THE LAND.
END OF SCHEDULE B...
THE TER OF THIS POLICY ARE MODIFIED BY THE ATTACHED INDORSEMENT.
WA: 10
A-2708. 9 PAGE 3
Mum:,• +
L:rePQ,g'!ai
owNesti INFLATION PROTECTION ENDORSEMENT
ATTACKED TO POLICY NO.
ISSUED BY
Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
The Company,recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property valuation and intending
top .vide additional monetary protection to the Insured Owner named in said Policy,hereby modifies
said'•olicy,as follows:
1. Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary, the amount of insurance
provided by said Policy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual
upward adjustments in the manner and to the extent hereinafter specified.
2. "Adjustment Date" is defined, for the purpose of this Endorsement, to be 12:01 a.m. on the
first January 1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy, as shown in
Schedule A"of the Policy to which this Endorsement is attached, and on each succeeding
January 1.
3. An upward adju3tment will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates, as defined above, by
increasing the maximum amount of insurance provided by said Policy (as said amount may
have been increased theretofore under the terms of this Endorsement) by the same percentage,
if any, by which the United States Department of Commerce Composite Construction Cost
Index (base period 1967) for the month of September immediately preceding exceeds the
highest Index number for the month of September in any previous year which is subsequent
to Date of Policy; provided, however, that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall
never exceed 150% of the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A of said Policy, less the
amount of any claim paid under said Policy which, under the terms of the Conditions and
Stipulations, reduces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual adjustment
in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Construction Cost
Index.
4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under said Policy, the amount of
insurance in force shall be deemed to be the amount which is in force as of the date on which
the insured claimant first learned of the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as
of the date of receipt by the Company of the first notice of such claim, whichever shall first
occur.
I othing herein contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said
Polic, .
is Endorsement is made a part of said Policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and
stip ations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof.
Pion- ,r National •itte‘i ranee ompany
E../
1 sir
byi'T.
r........._..._.
c'c •
i re t'
ti• , PN t gsident
0.
iZCi zap
Attest:
Secretary
NOT : In connection with a future application for title insurance covering said land, reissue credit,
on p mium charges (if applicable at all) will be allowed only upon the original face amount of
insu ce as stated in Schedule A of said Policy.
The Compal , os not surveyed the premises describe
The sketch belqw is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating said .premises and the
Company assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. It does not purport to show ALL highways, roads and ease -
ments adjoinin• or 'affecting said. premises.
rr
r
T
6'i"--t. lwsas ..N1
ll
J.Itill1:,I/1
i
it
l
iI
IiI
1
I
i lT
I '1 I;
1l
C,.
i
I. 14
1
i
Wi1 Co. 3 Map Dept. Reference. . . .%__`j•--, t
C::r,
6/7O i
Went Face Page P
EXHIB IT " B "
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCELd30 DNINOZ/DNIa1f11a,
col L '
t
ISSUED BY Z861 6 T dvW
iv..,,,..___. ....-- es-Z..010Z r*".. ff-' go_FT.-. i [fil ht 0 i" @
First American Title Insurance Company
FIRS AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration,
hereby commi s to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed
Insured name in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or
referred to in chedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules '
A and B and t the Conditions and Stipulations hereof.
This ommitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy
or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance
of this Commi ment or by subsequent indorsement.
This ommitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obli-
gations hereu der shall cease and terminate six IGI months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies
committed forl shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault
of the Comp.ny. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when
countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By-Laws. This Commitment
is effective as •f the date shown in Schedule A as"Effective Date.'
First American Title Insurance Company
BY
PRESIDENT
ATTEST G ' f , SECRETARY
w.-+ C. L
BY k' COUNTERSIGNED
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
I
Fourth and Blanchard Building
ii •
Seattle, Washington 98121
206-382-0400
To: First American Title
Insurance Company Commitment No. 67897 14
Fourth and1Blanchard Building Your No. 15223 MR
QSeattle, Washington 93121 Balko/Bennett • z
Attn: Molly Richards
S2HEDULE A
1. Effective Date: November 16, 1981 at 7:30 a.m.
Proposed Insured:, Delbert C. Bennett and Betty A. Bennett, husband
II
and wife
2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount Premium Tax
OWNER'S STANDARD COVERAGE 210,000.00 $604.00 $32.62
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this
commitment and covered herein is FEE SIMPLE and title thereto is at
the effective date hereof vested in:
ii TOM KURAMOrO and KIMIE KUR M YIO, his wife
4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows:I,
The West 175 feet of the South 622 feet of the East half of the
1SouthwestquarteroftheSouthwestquarterofSection10, Township
23 North, Range 5 East W.M. , in King County, Washington;
EXCEPT the South 42 feet thereof conveyed to King County for road by
deed recorded under Recording No. 5790505.
I Situate in the City of Renton,. County of King, State of Washington.
i
a (6/76)
ijm nt.Schecluie 6 ! 1
rr•
SCHEDULE B •Section 1
Requirements
0.
The f•!lowing are the requirements to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or
interest o be insured.
Item (b Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for
record.
11
SCHEDULE B — Section 2
Exceptions
The ••licy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed •f to the
satisfa Lion of the Company.
I
1.' axes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies .
axes or assessments on real property or by the public records.
2. •ny facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained
y an inspection of said
land
or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.
3, asements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. •
Ij
4. •iscrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines• shortage in area,encroachments,or any other facts which a correct
urvey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records.
5. npatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;
ater rights, claims or title to water.
6 • ny lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
nd not shown by the public records.
71! Defects, liens, encumbrnces. adverse claims or other matters,-if any, created, first appearing in the public rec-
ords or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires
I;
of record for value the estate or interest or•mortgage thereon covered by this commitment.
I
II
I
I
1
B ..,' '.Jf Exhibit
u
i ,
m. .
G'
No. 67;97
Continued •,
Schedule 3 - Section 2)Order
No. 167:
9
MR
F
estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said
property8.
any
if unpaid.
A$EMEN'T AND CONDITION; CONTAINED 'THEREIN AS GRANTED IN
4
9.
INSTRUMENT:
Recorded: December 22, 1944
Recording No. : 3436388 n a Massachusetts
Puget Sound Power & Light Company,
In favor of:
croration
For: Electric transmission and distributign line and
appurtenances
thereto
the ro rt herein described; the
center line of saidlineAffects: The East 7.5 feet of
thp
p
being along the W-sterl side
of said 7.5 feet
E i Said instrument contains the following:
Rights of access for purposes
of maintenance or repair.
10. EASEc4EN'T 'D CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN AS GRANTED OR RESERVED
IN INSTRUMENT:
I
Recorded: June 5, 1946
Recording No.: 3575606
and Telegraph Company, a
In favor of: The Pacific Telephone
California corporation
For: A pole line herein described
i; Affects: An unspecified portion of the property
EASEMENT AND CONDITPONS CONTAINED THEREIN AS CRF?TED OR ISCLOSED ;-
11. E•
IN INsTRUME.N'r:
li
Recorded: December 7, 1955
Recording No. : 4643925
Ingress•andegressFor: over the West half of the Southeast
Affects: A 15
e000
strip quarter of the Southwest quarter
quarter
of the 5ou'``=st3 North, Range 5 Easit W.M. , in
j of
King County,
o lOWaThngton, the center line of which is
described as follows: Commencingthe 3Southwest821c38ner
of said Section 10, thenc Point of
11
feet, thence North 0°17'32" 4est 30 feet to
beginning,
thence North 0°17'32" West 626.76 feet to the
I
North line of said subdivision
Continued Schedule 3 - Section 2) Order No. 67B97
Your No. 15223 MR
12. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon propertyL
herein described as granted by deed recorded under Recording No.
5790505.
13. E•• SEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONr•\I .ED ThEREIN AS GRADITED OR RESERVED
IN INSTRUMENT:
Recorded: September 20, 1964
Recording No. : 5790531
In favor of: King County, a municipal corporation
For: Utilities
Affects: The South 3 feet of the property herein described
14. MDRTGNGE AND NDDITION\L ADVANCES,' IF Z1NY, ;ND THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF
Mortgagor: Torn Kuramoto and Kimie Kuramoto, husband and wiffel
Mortgagee: Northwest Mortgage, Inc. , a Washington corporation
Original Amount: $13,500.00, plus interest
Dated: July 1, 1965
Recorded: . July 13, 1965
Recording No. : 5901557
The Mortgagee's/Beneficial interest has been assigned to Yonkers
Savings Bank, a New York corporation, on October 14, 1965 under
Recording No. 5939939.
15. CONTRACT OF SMLE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF
Seller: Tom Kuramoto and Kimie Kuramoto, husband and wife
Purchaser: Henry Balko and Nda 3alko, husband and wife
Dated: April 17, 1978
Recorded: April 19, 1978
Recording No. : 7304190315
I
Excise Tax Receipt No. : 468051
Examination of the records discloses no matters pending against the
name(s) of Delbert C. Bennett and 3etty A. Bennett, the proposed
insured(s) , according to the application for title insurance.
N3r6: General taxes for the year 1931 were paid in the amount of
565.01 for Tax Account No. 102305-9085-05.
cc: Mary Ryan Real Estate
Stewart Sulman, Attorney at Law
w
I
ORDER NO. (D7 l 7
ESCROW NO.
oti
6s MORTGAGOR
7-
yp
a
III
SECTION 1 - TO WISHf P R A.NGE
w I
S
1
CG
0
W 'i NI
I Y)
I.
il
v
1 r4
G_ .
3.
I
d
i Lis4) I
i
I I 1
4
c.
p•y
1 (`
j 1j I I
i
I h1I01ii
cI
N
i
l i
2ki r •;
1
aI
I
rt
ri l
f
i` 1
I ,
h I TI
I VI I. I
w- I
itLa
1
C Q I I i
J
I
GI
p l
99 I ).
Z
1 i/
BS I J.
e
S
7.7//y 7_ .
I7/
4 /13 V
I .
a.iV a
7S _
J ., I
y'/;
71i1 0Stl /.144S. .
U
u[.
V.. -tT T
r..®n t.. ,fr...,.,....
nr,n.rj.I. rn It t)I:I[i or. fi N!b"/ .
Ir•()
11v''
4
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS f7 egAip4,
O
0
474
PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER
e<®
ir
1`9 ,
98 49
NE 4th ST EAST OF UNION AVE NE G'0
RENTON, WASHINGTON
FAT
GE, ERAL
Th- proposed shopping center will be located on the north side of
NE 4th St immediately east of Union Ave. The shopping center will
be developed in two phases with the first phase projected for com-
pl-tion in 1983-84 and the second phase scheduled for completion
in 1985-86. The two phases for the project will have the follow-
in.: characteristics:
Phase I Phase II Total
Site area 7.85 Ac. 4.57 Ac. 12.42 Ac.
Building area' 87,242 SF 51,875 SF 139,117 SF
Parking required 480 285 765
Parking planned 480 287 767
Th: proposed shopping center will most likely include a major food
store, drug store, miscellaneous shops, financial institutions,
ano fast-food facilities. Access to the center is proposed to in-
clide 2 driveways onto Union Ave NE and 3 driveways onto NE 4th St.
EX STING CONDITIONS
Th: proposed shopping center site is surrounded by a network of
ar erial facilities. Major arterials in the vicinity of the pro-
je t include; NE 3rd St/NE 4th St/SE 128th St, an east-west four
la e facility with left-turn lanes at major intersections border-
in the site on the south and Sunset Blvd NE (SR 900), an east-
we t four lane facility with left-turn lanes at major intersect-
io s that is located approximately one mile to the north of the
si e. Secondary arterials in the vicinity of the site include;
Un on Ave NE, a north south-south four lane facility located on
th west boundary of the site, Monroe Ave NE, a north-south two
la e facility located approximately 3000 feet west of the site,
an 138th Ave SE, a, north-south two lane facility that is located
ap roximately 1500 feet east of the site.
Th intersection of NE 4th St and Union Ave NE is signalized with
le t-turn phasing and separate left-turn lanes on NE 4th St.
Un on Ave NE transitions to a two lane facility south of the inter-
se•tion.
1
a
Th- left-turn lanes and separate phasing for traffic on NE 4th
St at the inersection of NE 4th St and Union Ave NE were added
la_t year. Prior to that improvement, the intersection had the
wo st accident experience in the City of Renton. Following the
improvement, the accident experience has been very favorable with
th- intersection no longer among the top 30 intersections in the
Ci y in number of annual accidents.
Fiure 1 shows 1981 traffic volumes on the streets in the immediate
vi inity of the project.
TR P GENERATION
Th ITE TRIP GENERATION MANUAL provides data on trip generation
ra es for various-sized shopping centers. The average daily trip
ge eration rate for a shopping center in the size range of 100,000
to 199,999 gross square footage is 60.4 trips per 1000 gross square
fegt. Table I below summarizes trips for the proposed shopping
center:
TABLE I
Phase I Phase II Total
Daily trips 5269 3133 8402
PM pk hr trips in 227 135 362
PM pk hr trips out 253 150 403
PM pk hr trips total 480 285 765
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
It is estimated that the trips generated by the proposed project .
wi 1 be distributed onto the surrounding network of streets.
ro ghly in proportion to the relative traffic volumes on the two
st eets bordering the site. Figure 2 shows an estimate of the PM
pe k hour trips that will be developed by the site following
ph ses I and II.
TR FFIC IMPACTS
Th traffic that will be generated by the project will be a com-
bi ation of "new" traffic and '!existing" traffic. The site for
th project is along routes leading to similar existing existing
fa ilities and it cis reasonable to assume that many trips into
an out of the site will be motorists who are now passing the site
on their way to existing shopping centers or as part of other trip
pu poses. The fact that the area is presently underserved by sub-
re:ional shopping facilities strengthens the belief that many trips
wi 1 be intercepted rather than added. It is reasonable to assume,
2
L • '
in the absence of available statistics, that roughly half the trips
to the center will be "intercepted" trips and will therefore not
be adding to background traffic volumes.
Fi:ures 3 and 4 show the estimate of trips that will be added by
the project onto the streets immediately surrounding the site
fo lowing completion of phases I and II respectively. Note
th-t the volumes that have been added to the background traffic
ha 'e 'been computed at 50 percent of the total trips generated by
the project.
The primary impacts of the project will be on the streets in the
im ediate vicinity of the project (NE 4th St, Union Ave NE) and
up n the signalized intersection of NE 4th St and Union Ave NE.
Le t-turns into the site from both Union Ave NE and NE 4th St
ma cause some congestion and delay during afternoon peak hours.
Th s problem would be most noticeable on NE 4th St east of Union
Av6 NE where significant volumes now exist and east-bound left-
to ns into the site must be made from the inside through lane.
It may be necessary to install a two-way left-turn lane at that
po nt to prevent an unacceptable traffic condition.
Th: intersection of NE 4th St and Union Ave NE is now operating
at an acceptable level of service and should continue to do so
in the foreseeable future with normal traffic growth and the
impacts of the subject project.
3
II
FIGURE 1 r
1981 TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ADT)
r
r ,
0
PROI OCT SITE
0
D •
E 4- ST
916 1 10,149
Ill 7. 2.11 •18,132!)
J1,
At.
I
i
li II
FIGURE 2
PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS;GENERATED BY PROJECT
11
II
24(3a)
I, 4a (11)
II 53 (aG.
I t
24(38
40-3)
6'
III
Z
II eo 023 1 14)
1D1(I/I)_
111(190)
1) N 4-4 ST
4
2
1 z
11
I
11
001 PM Peak Hour Trips, Completion Phase I
040) PM Peak Hour Trips, Completion Phase II
IAs.umptions:
1. 60% of PM peak hour trips.to site from NE 4th St
ii will be from west and 60% of PM peak hour trips
li from site to NE 4th St will go east.
2. 50% of PM peak hour trips to/from site from Union
Ave NE willIbe from each direction (north/south)
I
I
111
it I
I 4
it
I I
I . I
v -
FIGURE
BACKGROUND + ADDED VOLUMES
7' PHASE I (1983)
PI
1 NI
2 (-4
7
ST
a-
45- • es
c4
eSSO (
44-0)
F45(
c /5)
1
ci11 I 038) i57 {Vogl-) 157 I 076)
r—
re%
trl r,
Annual Growth Factor 0.033 .
000 PM Peak Flour Background Volume
000) PM Peak Hour Background Volume + Project Volume
FIGURE 4
BACKGROUND + ADDED VOLUMES - PHASES I & II (1985)
en
en
o
r—
c0
M
U.)
2
0
r
4+" ST
TN N
911 (1 D44)
9
5511052) 955( I064)
993 (1164) 1021 (1192) 10Z1 (1211
r
N
N
r,,
An ual Growth Factor 0.033
00n PM Peak Hour Background Volume
O00) PM Peak Hour Background Volume + Project Volume
Transamerica
F. Trans • mer ca Title Insurance CompanyyFIlmTitleServies pO
Please oddressi'corr spondence to the office checked below:
Oil,
MAIN I AUBURN BALLARD BELLEVUE BOTHELL FEDERAL W
ICTSIKA4Joi
I• Palk P:a:a 230 Awbute Way So 6700 15th Me N W 10635 N E eth St 17524 Bothell Way N.E 33427 Pacific t/w
t,,
aaa S.E.361K.111
D6thAveatUre•r•i St Aubv'.WA 96002 Seattle.WA 96tt7 Boa 1a93 Bothell.WA 96011 Federal Way WA 9'ayl WA
7630e/tvSeattleWA96I7112061639.2566 (2061626-a610 Beuerue.WA 98009 (2061626.4606 636.3a11
J/
9Miji.
1206i 626.1E76 120616264661
U//•O•
e,,n
Coldwe 1 Banker
REM TON WEDfO00D wESTIOvTTL,Eso (
1600 P_rk Place Building Rentorn.WA98055 Seattle.WA99115 Seattle. 10
S e a tt l- , Washington ! 98101 • 206)62641625 (206(62E,620 (2061 628-4615
Atte'nt on: Ken Brown '
L
i j Your Order No. Our Order No. 647495
Multivest Ltd. /Bennett/Winston/King
County Water District No. 90 - Belanich
N PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT•FOR TITLE INSURANCE
j I Washington Land Title Association Form
1 Amount Premium Sales Tax Total
Xpc O
l
ner s standard coverage 1,066, 596. 30 $2, 284. 50 $150. 78 $2 ,435 . 28
Purch ser's standard coverage
II
Mortg gee's standard coverage
Mortg-gee's ALTA coverage) .
Tax R gistration
1 Total
Date: , J-nuary 14, 1982 at 8: 00 A.M. 2 ,435. 28
TR- NSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of
any appr•priate documents, its policy'or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this pre-
liminary commitment that tide;to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in
II as hereto attached -
subject o ly to the exceptions shown herein and the terms, conditions and exceptions contained'in the policy
forrni. T is report and commitment shall have no force or effect except.as a basis for the coverage spfcified
herein.
nh
By ("'''4:714t
628-5968) Title Officer
Deseript on: 1\
1a (: ,ca 1-- c.,,. •
1 s
as hereto attached -
ij
continued -
I
No TE:I.Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service,installation, maintenanc
or construction charges for sewer,water or electricity.
df:, 2.In the event this transaction fails to. close, a cancellation fee will be charged for servic s
rendered in accordance with our rate schedule.
r....—i. . .v,1.•”.A
January 14, 1982 Order No. 647495
ti
VESTED N:
MULTIVE •T LTD. , a Washington corporation and DELBERT C. BENNETT,
presump ively subject' to the community interest of his wife if married
on Janu:ry • 27, 1979, date of acquiring title as to Parcels A and B;
LEMMIE INSTON and ORA LEE WINSTON, husband and wife, as to Parcel C;
and KIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 90; a municipal corporation, as
to Parc-1 D; (See Notes 1, 2, and 3)
ii
li I
I I
I
I
I
I i
4.44
f
January 14, 1982
Order No. 647495
DESCRIP 'ION:
PARCEL
The Wes 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section
10, To , ship 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. ;
EXCEPT he North 629 feet thereof;
AND EXC PT the West 305 feet of the South 65 feet of the North 694
feet 'th-reof;
AND EXC PT the Southerly 435 feet of the Westerly 182 feet thereof;
AND EXC PT that portion thereof described as follows :
Beginni g at a point , 30 feet North of the Southeast corner ofsaidWest1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 10 ;
thence est 250 feet ;
thence North 436 feet;
thence East 250 feet;
thence South 436 feet to the point of beginning;
AND EXCEPT the most Southerly 42 feet thereof for S . E. 128th Street
as con eyed to King County by deeds recorded under Recording Nos .
5741040 and 5741044 ; '
ANDIOEPT the most Westerly 40 feet thereof for Union Avenue N. E. ; .
PARCEL B:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of the West 1/2 of the Southwest
1/4 'of the Southwest 1/4 of. Section 10, Township 23 North, Range
5 East, W.M. ;
thence North 435 feet ;
thence East 182 feet ;
thence South 435 feet;
thence West 182 feet to the point of beginning;
EXCEP the Westerly40 feet thereof for Union Avenue N. E. ;
AND' EICEPT that portion of the remainder thereof lying Southerly
of ,th : following described line:
Comme cing at the Southwest corner of said Section 10;
thenc: North. 0°25 ' 13" West along the West line thereof 42. 04 feet;
thane; South 88°02' 58" East parallel with the South line of said
subdi ision 40. 03 fleet to the intersection of the East margin of
Union Avenue N. E., with the North margin of N. E. 4th Street;
thenc - North 0°25' 13" West along said East margin, 158 feet to the
true .oint of beginning of the line herein described; ..
thenc- South 88°02' 58" East 142 feet to the East line of the main
tract herein described and the terminus of said described line
continued
i
j/
0.
Descrip .ion continued - Order No. 647495
PARCEL 1 :
I
That ,pottion of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4
of Sect on 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. , described s
follows
Begin'ni g 42 feet. North and 75 feet West of the Southeast corner of
said Wert 1/2;
thence est 175 feet ;'
thence i orth 424 feed;
thence ast 175 feet ;
thence .outh 424 feet to the point• of beginning;
PARCEL P :
i
The Eas 75 feet of the following:
Beginni g 42 feet North of the Southeast corner of the West 1/2
of the southwest 1/4 :of the Southwest 1/4 of Section. 10, Township
23 Nort' , Range 5 East , W. M. , in King County, Washington;
thence est 250 feet;
thence orth 424 feet ; .
thence • ast 250 feet ; -
thence South 424. feet to" the point of beginning;
ALL si uate in the County of King, State of Washington.
f
I!
II
r
Page 2
Order No. 647495
EXCEPTIONS :
A. 1% Exci e tax if unpaid.
Covers Parcels A, B,', and C only)
B. General taxes , as follows, together with interest after delinquency :
Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid
102305-913 -08 1979 871. 32 00
1980 707. 41 00
1981 1, 224. 19 00
1982 Not Available Payable February 15, 1982
Covers Parcel A)
aid
1
5e912
No. Year
1 Not Avaunt ilable Payable
illed Amount
February15 , 1982
102305 9128-04
Crnvers Parcel B)
1
Tax ,Ac ount No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid
102305 9089-01 1982 Not Available Payable February 15 , 1982
Covers Parcel C)
Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid
102305-9263-09 19E2. Not Available Payable February 15 , 19.82
lovers Parcel D)
1
11
1 . EASE INT , AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Postal Telegraph Cable Co.
Pu
Grant-e :
e :
The right to construct and maintain. its
p° lines of telegraph, including the necessary
poles and fixtures , and with the right to
trim all trees necessary to keep the wires
cleared at least 18 inches , to set necessary
guy and brace poles , and to attach to trees
the necessary guy wires
Alongthe roads , streets or highways adjoining
Area Affected:
the said property
Reco ding No. :
717661
1
1
continued -
I'
t Page 3
Order No. 647495
2. EASEMEN , 'AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantee The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph
Company, a California corporation
Purpose 1
Pole line
Area Af ected: The North 10 feet of the South 32 feet of the
East 250 feet of the South 424 feet of the
West 716.38 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of said Section 10, lying
North of, parallel to and abutting the North
margin of the 84 foot wide County Road,
S.E. 128th Street , known as CemeteryRoadRecordigNos . : 3575607 and 5828524
ii
Covers Parcels C andD)
3. EASEMEN AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantee The Pacific Telephone. and Telegraph Company
Purpoise Right-of-way
Area Af ected: West 466 . 38 feet of the West k of the South-
1 west 4 of the Southwest 4 of said Section 10
Recording No. : 3575608
Amendea by Instrumen',t recorded under Recording No. 5828524)
Covers the South 10 feet of Parcels A and C)
4. EASEMEN AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantee Puget Sound Power & LightCompanyPurposeIElectrictransmissionanddistribution line
Area 'Af ected: That portion of the property herein described
lying within the South 50 feet of the West
100 feet of the North 744 feet of the outh-
west 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section
10
Recordi g • No: 5152211
Covers Parcel A)
5. EASEMEN AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantee Puget Sound Power & LightCompanyPurposeVElectricline
Area Af ected: Approximately 100 feet South of the North
line of Parcel B or as may be relocated by
mutual consent
Recor1di g No: 5537887
11
continued -
1
ITr> '
I.
r
r
Page 4
1 Order No. 47495 -
6. EASEME `T AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Disclo•.ed By : , Instrument recorded under Recording No.
711021-0021
Purpos - : Ingress and egress
Area A fected: The South 42 feet of the West 60 feet of
Parcel B
7. EASEME4T AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Disclo-ed By:Instrument recorded under Recording No. '
711021-0022
Purpos - : Ingress and egress •
Area A' fected: The West 48 feet of the most Southerly 60
it feet of Parcel A
8. Restrictions imposed 'by instrument recorded on October 21, 1971,
under 'recording No. 1711021-0022, as follows :
Limiti g the use ofthe -West 45 feet of the most Southerly 158 feet and
of .the Southerly 45 ' feet of the most Westerly 187 feet of Parcel A for
parki g and driveway purposes , together with rights for the placement
of li:hting standards ,' drainage structures , paving, landscaping and other
relat .d site improvements .
9. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon the property
herei described as granted to King County by deeds recorded under
Recording Nos . 5741040 and 5830644.
Cove s a portion of Parcel A along S. E. 128th Street)
10. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property erein
des'cr bed as granted to King County by deed recorded under Recording
No.,
i
5 46658.
Cove ' s Parcel D) _
11. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein
des,'cr bed as .granted to King County, by deed recorded under Rec.rding
No. 5 '46659.
Coive s Parcel C) '
continued -
C • I 1
y
Page 5
Order No. 647495
12. MORTGAG AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Mortg,agi.r: Lemmie Winston and Ora Lee Winston,,
his wife
Mortgag-e : Ballard. Mortgage .Company, Inc. , a Washington
corporation
Amount :15, 600. 00
Dated: September 7, 1965
Recorde• : September 13 , 1965
Recordi g No: 5926880
Covers Parcel C)
ASSIGP INT OF SAID MORTGAGE:
i
Assigne- : Albany Savings Bank; New York
Dated: . September 23 , 1965
Recorded: September 28, 1965
Recordi g No: 5933231
Covers Parcel C) '
13. ASSIG INT OF CONTRACT AND DEED GIVEN AS SECURITY AND THE 'TERMS
AND CO DITIONS THEREOF:
Granto Jay .David Jensen and Amy H. Jensen,
his wife .
Grante: : James H. Clawson .
Amount: 10, 000. 00
Dated: August 21, 1972
Record:d: August 23, 1972
Recoird ng No:
i
720823-0441
Cover- Parcel B)
I
14. DEED 0 ' TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITI'NS
THEREO: :
Granto : Delbert C. Bennett and Multivest, Ltd. , a
1 Washington corporation
Truster : Safeco Title Insurance Company
Benefi iary: . John G. Clawson and Cherie M. Clawson, husband
and wife
148 West Lake Sammamish Boulevard S . E. :
i
Bellevue , Washington)
Amount : . 230, 000. 00
Dated: February 14, 1979
Recor.d-d: February' 27, 1979
Record,ng No: 790227-0147
Cover Parcels A and B)
continued -
1
1 1
i
s
ff
f
Page 6
Order No. 647495
15. DEED{!OF TRUST AND .THE TERNS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantor: Delbert C. Bennett and Bette Ann Bennett,
husband andwifeTrustee :
i Pioneer National Title Insurance. Company, a
corporationBeneficary: Fairfield Developments , Inc.
11058 Main Street ; Suite 110; Bellevue,
Washington)
Amount:
NotDisclosedDated: April 29, 1981
Recordea :
May 26, 1981
Recordi g No: 810526-0482
Covers Parcels A and B)
16. CONTRACT OF SALE, AND, THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Seller:
Lemmie Winston and Ora Lee Winston,
husband and wife
Purchas _r: Delbert C. Bennett and Bette Ann Bennett,
husband and wife and Multivest Ltd. , a
WashingtoncorporationDated: November 18, 1980Recorded: December 2, 1980
Recordin_ No: 801202-0247 E# 0617703)
Covers i'arcel C)
See Not-s 1 and 2)
17. DEED OF RUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantor : Delbert C. Bennett and Bette Ann Bennett,
husband and wife
Trustee : Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, a
corporation
Benefici.:ry: - Fairfield Developments , Inc.
11058 Main Street ; Suite 110; Bellevue,
Washington)
Amount: Not Disclosed
Dated: ,
April 29, 1981
Recorded: May 26, 1981
Recordin: No: 810526-0483
Covers 'arcel C)
continued -
f
lr
i
0.
v
I
Page 7
Order No. 47495
18. Ques'ti .n of the marital status of Delbert C. Bennett on January 17,
1979, .ate of acquiring title as to an undivided interest in Parcels
A and
NOTE 1 :
A showing should be made of the authority of the officers executing
the pr.posed deed, or contract , on behalf of Multivest Ltd.
NOTE;; 2 :
The pr.posed deed must be authorized by resolution of the directors
and st.ckholders of Multivest Ltd. and certified copy submitted.
NOTE , 3 :
The pro•osed deed from King County Water District No. 90 must be
authorized and executed in accordance with the relevant statutes of the
State of Washington relating to municipal corporations .
NOTE 4:
Accordi' g to the application, title is to vest in Roger Belanich , a
single an. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name
of said party.
1i
FSH/df
rrm\ g y g C
ue byeavtax hiu Checked Date I-15-62 Plat VoL PG. 'Order No. 647495
ScaLe : I " _ /00'
SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER
To assist in locating the premises. It i not based on a survey, and the company
I
assumes no liability for variations if any, in dimensions and location.
I
I
I iI5. Luse of AI. 629' SW4,5W4 •
40' xc a pt io n
W.3 5 v 5.65'of N.654)
I
WI
2
e; K1 l:: ?A1C.G I... A
If,
rn
N
1
1IAO
250' eJ
iet -- i 175' 75' vi
i435N
1
It
r
COAl U1 1
l3ato gi
O C I• .
11iJ ii
cs#)w:
e: '
Z
f2'
fir
3
141
N ao 1
a .. E
t,P
1
40 re
t 75'
75'
Iti
if
wve Eo
I LC
Y To K.C. tc
0 .574/vse ls74/0 4 S. E. 126Ty--- ST,
t5°'
5 W Cord r I
JSLCTlA/ WVz,5 w4 sw4
I
Note—This p.does not purport to show all higbwaya, roads or easements affecting the property.
1
4 411 ceipt #
i
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 , ir i'•e i 4',.--,,1;. !'"
i `,, •
NAME ./ •''''''•• ;4 ,'' C i' f 7
PROJECT & LOCATION j':'.' ". ..,.., , ., 4,,),"' ,It ., f.".
1,- ' ( , J11''4 f' -;-- 1 ••"V(
e-
1
Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total
4 , 1.-;, --
1•, f A ,,:v''',,
1A r) '''"-
1'' ..:'
C..'1'1 e I ("C.C."
l',
1
1
Environmental Checklist
i' Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee
1
TOTAL FEES•
Please take ;this receipt andlyour payment to the Finance Department on the first!floor.
Thank vou. ,
1
I
t
i,....
tiNDING
i
OF FILE
I
FILE TITLE
I
I
0li .......... 0074
I
1
1,
I
I0Ir .
I
I
i
I
I