Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA84-014 & LUA84-015PARTIES OF RECORD John L. Hendrickson Bob Tomberg Lucas, Glase, Sherman & Hendrickson 5611 119th SE, #2 Honeywell Center, Suite 505 Bellevue, WA 98006 600-108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Roger Green 9818 124th Avenue SE Eva Jean Hyley Renton, WA 98055 Huseland 'Educational Trust Fund 1224 South 211th Street Curtis J . Martin Seattle, WA 3728 Park Avenue N . Renton, WA 98055 Mitch Murray 2813 NE 23rd Place Greg Diener Renton, WA 98056 Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue South Robert S William Kobayash Renton, WA 98055 2707 NE 125th Seattle, WA 98125 Mel Easter, Architect Johnson Braund Design Group Thomas A. Johnson, AIA 304 Main Avenue South Johnson Braund Design Group Renton, WA 98055 304 Main Avenue S. , Suite 200 LorraineDammanRenton, WA 98055 2809 NE 23rd Place Bob Lemly Renton, WA 98056 6005 Hazlewood Drive SE Mr, Mrs. WayneOylerBellevue, WAa y 2123 Harrington Place NE T . B . Malmoe Renton, WA 98056 12105 SE 96th Place KathleenGormleyRenton, WA 98056 2820 NE 23rd Place Amos Huseland Renton, WA 98056 1916 Edmonds Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 uSarn er-Odert`ck Russell Bergeron 13o3 S• • i te-- 2807 NE 21st Street Renton, WA 98056 Ds-6 Mick Santa S(w' d e A, hv5e a p,2, 4444 Issaquah-Pine Lake Road 2O cv -s-f-nle.Issaquah, WA 98027 r'e Chuck Youngquist 12110 SE 96th Renton, WA 98055 Randy Corman 2216 Harr1igton Pl. NE Mr. Visick Renton, WA. 98056 0r)""2" 12405 SE 98th Street s t - 6 Renton, WA 98055 Pat Sado 9902 126th Avenue SE ffnr. JohnsonBraund dbdesign group p.s., inc. architecture,englneerirg&planning consultants Greg A Diener, P.E. Penton 271-7200 Seattle 623-5732 304 Main Avenue South,Suite 200 Renton,Washington 98055 1 1-17L fT r VICINITY MAP 1SNOAVE.111 II 2 . --;,__,-----' •:—: AI,..,, ,, I,,,,„„. Id7/.,,,,rr.r..,.e.,,.I 70- r' s s.. L exlating R-1 zone r3 r' 14< r' Fy,..ef'-1 21 A ,' ' 2- i,- Ki III: , :, ; : I, u• xrLoj1 0\I\ \( ( Irk, 00 , ,:,:,,_ ! g IMt' k''*' 14° -, .,, . 21,,;e:e4;\L\ 5,,,, ,- ): \, L__Lc"-7.`-' '''''''' 1,,, s,,.40110 ‘'.,,," 1,-,A.,, il, \ ii(..\\ Asek , „„ ,, , ,.., 4,,,,,, greenbelt o, vIS orom ' , 1 °, ; NkTho:, *411` •" s''''''' ' .‘ 1 1,, 14,,'•,._. 4. , _, 41 .. , ,,.,., 1 existing40, R 1 zone 444 \ \ A4. Jjt.''.''''';'4, mint .,-- : 1,411 e At 1., 04.' k; iottVs. 4071.44.7. A No „„ , ... , No 4V., 449 -IAN iii. _ , iv, .,,74.?„:" 4 , vgiiiii: 13 kit\'‘ V \ NiwINktviter!,* - ,.____ 40 4ki ' UJI I ' V)'1,- it._ i \VLI, \ \ 4;41144:- - . 0, 41, f? y 1* 0),„ 4, - .,. ssti a.9 t e e t 66 1,„,„` ,,,, ,4.,Cip, \ ,' \ 0 r1Jt _ ti..„..\,,. .\ °:\'\ \ \ 4,\\ t,, ik co , ., r al \0 '`1"'" \ i" , A r J q ice_ a7 h Iii s,, k :_,,,*41., s\, N.7417-,,,,441jirr..*4-1111& r. _,,,, liii; ,,iL,,,1-1 L, t \ Atitya ' 447! \\ ,0 ‘44' )) ',,L ' OA Olti ) 1 " I''''' 0***ILitha*: ' \ 470\1 * \ I A\ 4* ''''11' ': ''' )- 71_ ' 141111rgodt Irerd;' , 1, \\ \\ • ,,,14 „,14„,!-\, ) - 4 n 1 ro_ __/j., IN-- -_____, rnr„I ' ft,. 1 g,' 4' VI'kr \\Si..t, I., : ii ) /- ___.--------7________„/ Z/-\---) 1 ; ° A ''''" ir:Z1h1;11 0'.-7'4, 1 141* \ \ 04 ( 7 r g i , N LI,.._ 1.--\____ N ..„... irr, i2r.„----, ,-, k, ii,.. s, j_____•____,______________;11--______-__-----7C-1) 1 ' t 404triter ,-----,,_. II 3)-; ..44: 414tit ,,,„,.....14,. ... ,_____---,_______ 17- .. - ± , , i 1 1. ,..:.- It . 10. ...........:44‘, t_44.,„ vr` i a 1. k% ," -, !:" + I 1 , il, LA /id r7 al Iv V greenbelt Y]]'' Cl JEFFERSON Iffi AVE.N.E. 1-1— I— I I j)M =), I existing R-2 zone it, ziti=jc-Rz-z-c\Rrj i O n, j___, __1 i 1 i=)LI:=3j(i 1)1_1= j i ilr=jf I o 30 BO .1o a Qeo J—L_ --I —1 oJ 7 U r SCALE:l••SS'-O VICINITY MAP az.Ate. 04 1 1 II 0-\4t I/ i 2 „ _____T—___I l I=. 1(411L'-‘ 1AwL1 I E3 lasik,;) V]-___,„;\\ 4=al 7 c(/( k* li ( S \ -- 111\ I I4I 1 V \Re.n 1 URE_DEVELOPMENT OF i xN 11-7:aw\ taa1 \ flDOMIN1UMUNITSi, N 7— 4k:` H14E1°E77. ,. a. , \ V' \‘ 1 I________-_________) 1. A 0\ \ r\ AI N \ \ f A.:,, \ \\\ n r ,_____, --- ___— _—_ 0 P.1*- 4 s N)\ \, M II I AKKKV—— i/ W 1% \ N'• r _I 1 l AL*' v- 1 I r' \ 7--- -'--,7,KNI\ ( ( r r 41,11, \t, 1A---- k.' i g I(TACK! ri . , III i. 11,1\\1 : 44talt," 4N,\. \\-‘,`.''i ? kv _ii.., 20 Affi 4 . 11 , 4,--- A- 4 " Fildvit i , 10 PA aIlii0f° ( iii 440U ,,'\\ ) ril KED T q , _ -8e - , ii i ,itis ,1 44--- ----- ft/ 2 m• W f 7VidtkX44, -. -,--ir' I 0, n as f 9rslt Iigenbe11 / xFFEEMON12r'tE'• existing R-2 zone i f.71f_ IJ11 QRut Qf______• 7 2 , E E. L 2. 1. 1112".. 2 . 111 OF RA,A I' 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U 2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, D9oG am. CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 94TFD SEP1O August 29, 1985 To: ALL PARTIES OF RECORD Re: Renton City Council action of August 26, 1985 concerning Honey Creek Associates Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision to dismiss Rezone and Preliminary Planned Unit Development R-014-84 and PPUD 015-84 The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 26, 1985 concurred in the Planning and Development Committee report reversing the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 7, 1985 (which had dismissed proceedings) and remanded the matter to the Hearing Examiner for consideration by him on the merits. The Planning and Development Commitee report recommended that the City Council find the dismissal of the applications was improper as a matter of law because of lack of notice required by City Code Section 4-3013(E) which amounts to a denial of the applicant's right of due process. The report also stated that the Hearing Examiner's finding of lack of diligent prosecution by the applicant is moot because the applicant has now received approval of the lot line adjustment from King County. Finally, the report stated that duplication of proceedings which will exist by reason of the previous remand of the application by the City Council will create some confusion in the record, however, such confusion is not sufficient justification for dismissal of the application. At the time of scheduling of R-014-84 and R-015-84 before the Hearing Examiner, all parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the proceedings by the Building and Zoning Department. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk enton City Council 8/26/85 Page four Audience Comment continued The Luckey Company Councilwoman Keolker commended City Attorney Warren for Victoria Hills) his assistance during the appeal process, and thanked continued Councilman Reed for replacing Councilman Stredicke on the Planning and Development Committee during review of this matter. Councilman Stredicke had excused himself when challenged by the applicant' s attorney for possible violation of appearance of fairness doctrine.) AUDIENCE COMMENT Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE, #2, Bellevue, requested the continued Council to advance to Planning and Development Committee Advance to report regarding the Honey Creek Appeal . MOVED BY MATHEWS, Old Business SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF Honey Creek Appeal BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke Development presented a report regarding the appeal by Honey Creek Committee Associates of the decision of the Hearing Examiner on Honey Creek Appeal 6/7/85 to dismiss the applications. The Committee found R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 that dismissal of the applicants is improper since lack of notice required by City Code Section 4-3013(E) amounts to a denial of the applicant ' s right of due process. Further, the Hearing Examiner' s finding of lack of diligent prosecution by the applicant is now moot because the applicant has now received approval of the lot line adjustment from King County. Finally, the duplication of proceedings which will exist by reason of the previous remand of the application by the City Council will create some confusion in the record. Such confusion does not justify dismissing the application. Continued Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner of 6/7/85 which dismissed the proceedings, and remand the proceedings back to the Hearing Examiner for consideration of the merits of the application. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Lincoln Property Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue S. , representing Renton Hill Landscaping - Community Association, requested a status report on the matter Renton Hill of landscaping installation by Lincoln Property Company at its development on Grant Avenue S. , constructed three years ago. Mayor Shinpoch explained that the developer was required to install the landscaping, and the condition was assured by the requirement of a bond, which the city will call if the developer does not comply. She will research the timing of the matter and notify Mrs. Larson. Mayor Shinpoch also advised contacting the Pacific Institute in response to an earlier suggestion by Mrs. Larson to find a positive solution to the cruising problem. A response is forthcoming. Fire Department Sanford Webb, 430 Mill Avenue S. , expressed concern regarding Response and fire hazards as a result of dry summer to apartment buildings Training Center located close together. He noted emergency vehicles have difficulty in maneuvering at the top of Mill Avenue South on Renton Hill due to limited turnaround space. Mr. Webb questioned City expenditure of $15,000 to study possible construction of a local fire/police training center when a training facility is already in operation in North Bend. He also felt the City of Renton is too small to warrant FBI training for its police chief. Mayor Shinpoch advised that the Renton Fire Department is a fully-manned professional unit whose members are in constant training to handle all types of emergencies. She noted that response drills to intentionally set fires are common in the program, turnaround radius is required on City streets to provide space for emergency vehicles, and fire hydrants are visibly marked for access. The proposed training site, a consortium of the four valley cities (Kent, Auburn, Tukwila and Renton) , will expand upon training offered by the state-run North Bend facility, which deals mainly with hazardous waste and chemical fire emergencies. The distance to North Bend has been computed, and it has been determined that a local facility, structured to meet training needs for day-to-day emergencies, is more cost effective for the City. Renton City Council 7/22/85 Page eight Administrative Report ADMINISTRATIVE The Green River Management Agreement was signed on Thursday, REPORT July 18th, by representatives of the four Valley cities and Green River King County. Mayor Shinpoch was pleased to see Councilmembers Management Stredicke, Mathews and Hughes in attendance for the ceremony, Agreement held at Riverfront Park in Kent. The five jurisdictions will share the $196,000 cost of monitoring the flow of the river, and constructing, repairing and maintaining dikes. Railroad Track Public Works Director Houghton and Street Superintendent Jack Inspection Crumley joined the roadmaster of Burlington Northern for a field inspection of the railroad tracks in the Central Business District recently. A cooperative agreement was reached for some improvement of the tracks. 1-405 "S" Mayor Shinpoch proposed a scenario wherein once the draft Curve Project environmental impact statement for the 1-405 "S" curve project has been received from the State DOT, staff and Councilmembers would meet to critique the document and discuss alternatives. Council could then hold a public meeting to provide constituents the opportunity to learn the Council ' s rationale and to provide input for the public record on the preferred alternative. The next step would be the open house sponsored by the State DOT at the Sheraton Inn in September at which they plan to present the route selection. Mayor Shinpoch indicated her intent to provide copies of the draft EIS to each Councilmember when available to enable them to respond to constituents regarding the project. Boulevard Councilman Stredicke requested the Administration investigate Restaurant the legality of automobile storage in the parking lot of the Car Storage Boulevard Restaurant on Airport Way. He suggested that a landscape buffer may be necessary to protect single family residences which abut the commercial lot. Mayor Shinpoch will report back. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, questioned the cost Honey Creek of publishing the Renton Report. Administrative Assistant Associates Parness estimated cost at 30 cents per copy. He also asked Appeal for a time and date certain of the Planning and Development Committee meeting to discuss the Honey Creek appeal referred on 7/15/85. Committee Chairman Stredicke will announce a meeting at the next Council meeting, 8/5/85. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10:21 p.m. e MAXINE E. MOTOR, City C erk Renton City Council 7/15/85 Page two Consent Agenda continued Rossman Claim Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Anne M. for Damages Rossman, 533 Grant Avenue South, Renton, for replacement of CL 25-85 mattress cover allegedly damaged by discolored City water in washing machine (7/2/85) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Certification City Clerk submitted Certification of State Highway Routes of State by the Washington State Department of Transportation, describing Highway Routes routes within the limits of incorporated cities and towns as 1985 of July 1 , 1985. Refer to Public Works Department. Official City Clerk submitted official population report from the Population Washington State Office of Financial Management as of 4/1/85 1985 for the year 1985 for cities, towns and counties; population of Renton is 34,030; figures will be used for allocation of State revenues beginning January, 1986. Information only. Honey Creek Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision to dismiss Honey Creek Associates Associates applications for rezone, R-014-84, and preliminary Appeal planned unit development, PPUD-015-84, filed by John L. R-014-84 Hendrickson, attorney for applicant. Original report issued PPUD-015-84 by Examiner on 3/4/85; reconsidered by Examiner on 3/20/85; appealed to City Council on 4/3/85 by Mitch Murray and the applicant; remanded to Hearing Examiner by City Council on 5/6/85; and dismissed by Hearing Examiner on 6/7/85. Property located in the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE, also proposed for annexation. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Alano Lounge Mayor Shinpoch submitted request for funding from Al Wright, Request for President of Southend Alano Lounge, to support 1986 activities Funds aiding recovery of individuals addicted to drugs and alcohol . Refer to Community Services Committee. Emergency Public Works Department requested legislation to implement Water emergency water conservation measures to limit use of City Conservation water during periods of hot, dry weather. Refer to Utilities Ordinance Committee. Street Light Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department requested ordinance Study Funding to appropriate $15,000 grant from Washington State Energy Grant Office unto Street Fund/Traffic Engineering to implement Street Lighting Study, approved in 1985 City of Renton Budget. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Union Avenue Public Works Department submitted CAG 007-85, Union Avenue NE Waterline Waterline Replacement, W-773; and requested approval of the Replacement project, authorization for final pay estimate of $2,533.32, W-773 commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained CAG 007-85 amount of 55,589.O4 to contractor, Grant Construction, if all required releases have been received. Total project cost is 120,835.04. Council concur. Consent Agenda MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT Approved AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Building & Zoning Director Ronald G. Nelson, Development representing the Environmental Review Committee, was read. at N. 44th Mr. Nelson apprised Council of two proposed developments Street located on King County property immediately adjacent to the Interchange City of Renton limits. The first, 4.5 acre parcel east of Denny' s Restaurant at 44th Street interchange, is being considered for development of commercial or multifamily residential use in a four-lot subdivision. Upon completion, the development would depend upon the City of Renton to supply water, sewer, storm drainage facility and allow access from two of the lots across private easements in the City. Since annexation cannot be required until connection to the water system occurs, the developer would build to King County standards through its development process rather than meeting Code requirements of the City. The ERC recommends that the City pursue annexation of the site and not allow access to nor certification for City water until that process is complete. For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # 10 . d . AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk For Agenda Of July 15, 1985 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Maxine E. Motor Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Consent XX Decision to Dismiss Honey Creek Associates Public Hearing Correspondence Rezone and PPUD Applications; File No. Ordinance/Resolution R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A• Hearing Examiner's Dismissal_ 6/7/85 Other B. App icant's Request for Reconsideration, • 6/19/85 Approval : C. Hear inq Examiner's Response, 6/24/85 D. Applicant's Appeal, 7/3/85 Legal Dept. Yes No_ N/A_ COUNCIL ACTICN RECOMMENDED:Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Other Clearance Refer to Pla fining and Development Committee FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Bacl.ground information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) An appeal has been filed by John L. Hendrickson, legal counsel for Honey Creek Associates, regarding the decision to dismiss the subject applications by the Hearing Examiner due to considerable alteration of the original plans. Origiial report issued by Examiner on 3/4/85; reconsidered by Examiner on 3/20/85; appealed to the City Council on 4/3/85 by Mitch Murray and the applicant: remanded to the Hearing Examiner by the City Council on 5/6/85; and dismissed by the Hearing Examiner on 6/7/85. PARTIES OF RI:CORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. pF Rv o THE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o m BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 0900 co- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 917- F0 3EP1c_ v0 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING ss. MARILYN J . PETERSEN, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 9th day of July, 1985, at the hour of 5: 00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail, to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION TO DISMISS REZONE AND PPUD APPLICATIONS FILED BY HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. Marilyn J jrsen, Deputy Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 9th day of July, 1985. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in Renton PARTIES OF RECORD John L. Hendrickson Bob Tomberg Lucas, Glase, Sherman & Hendrickson 5611 119th SE, #2 Honeywell Center, Suite 505 Bellevue, WA 98006 600-108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Roger Green 9818 124th Avenue SE Eva Jean Hyley Renton, WA 98055 Huseland Educational Trust Fund 1224 South 211th Street Curtis J . Martin Seattle, WA 3728 Park Avenue N . Renton, WA 98055 Mitch Murray 2813 NE 23rd Place Greg Diener Renton, WA 98056 Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue South Robert & William Kobayash Renton, WA 98055 2707 NE 125th Mel Easter, ArchitectSeattle, WA 98125 Johnson Braund Design Group Thomas A. Johnson, AIA 304 Main Avenue South Johnson Braund Design Group Renton, WA 98055 304 Main Avenue S. , Suite 200 LorraineDammanRenton, WA 98055 2809 NE 23rd Place Bob Lemly Renton, WA 98056 6005 Hazlewood Drive SE Mr. & Mrs. WayneOylerBellevue, WA 2123 Harrington Place NE T. B . Malmoe Renton, WA 98056 12105 SE 96th Place KathleenGormleyRenton, WA 98056 2820 NE 23rd Place Amos Huseland Renton, WA 98056 1916 Edmonds Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 Russell Bergeron 2807 NE 21st Street Renton, WA 98056 Mick Santa 4444 Issaquah-Pine Lake Road Issaquah, WA 98027 Chuck Youngquist 12110 SE 96th Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Visick 12405 SE 98th Street Renton, WA 98055 Pat Sado 9902 126th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 OFivJ 1 THE CITY OF RENTON t$ © z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 CO. CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0, 9gT 0 ESEPS ? P July 8, 1985 APPEAL FILED BY ATTORNEY FOR HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Re: Appeal of Decision of Hearing Examiner to Dismiss Honey Creek Associates Application for Rezone and Preliminary Planned Unit Development, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision to dismiss these applications has been filed with the City Clerk, accompanied by proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON 6 - G Maxine E. Motor City Clerk OF R THE CITY OFRENTONo U ... 4 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o IA eS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 9 CO' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 091 Tg- Ss_P1kJ" July 8, 1985 APPEAL FILED BY ATTORNEY FOR HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Re: Appeal of Decision of Hearing Examiner to Dismiss Honey Creek Associates Application for Rezone and Preliminary Planned Unit Development, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision to dismiss these applications has been filed with the City Clerk, accompanied by proper fee of $75. 00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON 6(I,wic_,e 6 - O OC Maxine E. Motor City Clerk OF R4, THE CITY OF RENTON aw, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Z eta s BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9FD SEP1S- 1- June 7, 1985 PARTIES OF RECORD RE: Honey Creek Association I have reviewed materials submitted to this office regarding the original application, as well as the decision of the City Council remanding the matter back to this office, and have decided that the matter should be dismissed at this time. The matter was remanded to hear information relating to the status of legal lots and to assure that all parties who should have been notified of the various requests were so notified. Since the applicant is in the process of modifying existing lot lines, the Building and Zoning Department indicates that the various density provisions will be affected accordingly. The original application and the matters to be considered have been altered, or will be altered considerably, and are not within the bounds of the remand. A delay of up to 3 months might occur, and it will not serve the public interest to continue the matter any longer. Further, it is also apparent that the information in the application will no longer be accurate and a confusing record might well result. Since the matter is not being diligently pursued, and the premise of the original application is being altered, this office has determined that the matter should be dismissed (Section 4-3013(E)). A new application containing current information for review should be submitted and processed in the regular manner. The applications, R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84, are hereby dismissed. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, FRED J. K UFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk4k67- cc: Mayor Shinpoch CITY OF hick*,chi% City Attorney JUN 71985MembersCityCouncil VCity Clerk g C ,SOR10E Attorney Hendricksen Building & Zoning Department Policy Development Director Record-Chronicle LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN 8 HENDRICKSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW CURT D. BLAKE HONEYWELL CENTER PETER J. GLASE SUITE 505 JOHN L. HE:NORICKSON 600 - IOBTH AVENUE N.E. PETER J. LUCAS BELLEVUE, WA 98004 MERRILEE A. MACLEAN DENNIS J. McLERRAN JOHN A. SEETHOFF• June 19, 1985 206) 453-0300 JAMES D. SHERMAN WASHINGTON AND CALIFORNIA BARS Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re:Honey Creek Associates/R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Kaufman: In behalf of the applicant with regard to the above-referenced applications, Honey Creek Associates, it is respectfully requested that the Examiner reconsider the dismissal of the referenced applications pursuant to the letter dated June 7, 1985. The applicant requests that the Examiner reconsider this determination for the basic reasons that the applicant does not intend to make considerable alterations to the applications, the applications remain within the bounds of the remand and the applicant is diligently pursuing the subject applications. Additionally, the applicant has expended substantial sums of time and resources in the subject applications, and a dismissal of the same would impose a substantial hardship on the applicant without any resulting benefit to the public. The City Council remanded the dismander to the Examiner primarily as a result of 1.he discovery of the existence of two lots within the subject parcel. After discussion of this fact with the Building and Zoning Department staff, it was determined that the existing lot line should most appropriately be adjusted in location to correspond with the line separating the two phases, as originally proposed. The applicant initiated the lot line adjustment process after agreeing with the staff as to the location of the adjusted lot line. It was further agreed with the staff that the remanded hearing would be most appropriately convened subsequent to the conclusion of this process. This was not, however, a requirement of the applicant. If, in the discretion of the Examiner, time is of the essence, the applicant would have no objection to convening the hearing at an earlier date. Clearly, the applicant has no interest in delaying this matter or causing the City of Renton review process to extend any longer than necessary. Upon convening the remand hearing, the Examiner will be reviewing an application that is essentially the same as that previously reviewed. The proposed zoning, buildinglocationsandbuildingdesignremainthesame. The application originally proposed 99 dwelling units in Phase I, and it is estimated that at the remand hearing this density will be substantially reduced. Consequently, the impacts of the proposed development are anticipated to be less than originally proposed for Phase I. The focus of the Mr. Fred J. Kaufman June 19, 1985 Page two Examiner's initial review was on the first phase, as this was the only subject of the environmental review. This remains the case. It would appear that dismissing the current application and immediately reapplying would potentially be more confusing to the public in reviewing the records of this matter than if the current application was continued. The filing of second applications certainly will cause a substantial amount of duplication, both on the part of the applicant and the staff, as well as any interested members of the public. This would not appear to serve any party's interest. Additionally, the City will presumably require further application fees when, in fact, the applications would be essentially the same as the current ones, requiring little or no administrative review. In summary, the applicant is willing to proceed at an earlier date than previously requested, although it would seem to be more prudent for all parties to have the hearing convened subsequent to the conclusion of the lot line adjustment process. This matter is of particular importance to the applicant, and the applicant respectfully requests that the Examiner establish a hearing date to consider the current applications on remand as directed by the City Council members. Dismissal of current applications will only result in unnecessary duplication of effort and additional fees since the substance of the applications remains the same. Inasmuch as the Examiner made the dismissal determination on an ex parte basis and without advance notice to the parties, the Examiner may wish further information regarding the points raised herein. If such is the case, we will look forward to addressing any questions or concerns the Examiner may have. Very truly yours, LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN alHE DRICKSO Jo L. Hendrickson cc: Honey Creek Associates Johnson Braund Design Group JLH:jg 8-060 RECEIVED JUN 2 01985 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER pF RIt0 L :-z THE CITY OF RENTON i* MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 kCZi rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0 co. O P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-25939 TF0 SE P-Ws° June 24, 1985 John L. Hendrickson LUCAS, .LASE, SHERMAN & HENDRICKSON Attorneys At Law 600 108th Avenue N.E., Suite #505 Bellevue, Washington. 98004 Re: Hon,3y Creek Associates/R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Hendrickson: I have r viewed your letter of June 19, 1985 as well as other information in the file pertaining to this matter. I believe it would be a disservice not only to the applicant, but the general public who remain interested in this matter, to modify the order dismissing the subject application. As was pointed out in the letter, "it would seem more prudent for all parties to havethehearingconvenedsubsequenttotheconclusionofthelotlineadjustmentprocess." Atthattimetheentirerequestcouldbereviewedasacohesiveproject. If review were to occur at this time, and a lot line adjustment was achieved, modifications might be requested only requiring new staff analysis, new postings and publications, andnewhearings. Rather than draw the process out over subsequent review hearings it would seem les; confusing to have the entire project laid out for a thorough review in one clear proceeding. The public and the applicant will not be served by looking at a file which containstheoriginalapplication, which according to the original decision erroneously appliedaninappropriatestandardforreview. On top of that confusion would be grafted the confusion of shifting lot lines and the subsequent analysis by staff of a variety of configurations. A new application would present a clear picture of what propertyisinvolved, what are its configurations, what is requested, what densities are permitted, from where and to where are densities to be transferred, and what housing types maybepermittedonthepropertiesorproperty. In other words, a whole series of issues which are certainly unfocused as the request now stands. Therefore, this office still believes that it would be in the best interest of the public and the applicant to dismiss the matter and permit a new application which clearly indicates what ha been requested and clearly permits an analysis of the proposal without the baggage associated with the prior request. If furthe • assistance is necessary, please feel free to contact this office. Sincereel'') FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARIN 2. EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Mayor Shinpoch L. Warren, City Attorney Building & Zoning Department Policy Development Department LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN 8 HENDRICKSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW CURT D. BLAKE PETER J. GLASE HONEYWELL CENTER JOHN L. HENDRICKSON SUITE I 05 PETER J. LUCAS 600 - OBTN AVENUE N.E. MERRILEE A MACLEAN BELLEVUE, WA 98004 DENNIS J. MCLERRAN JOHN A. SEETHOFF• July 3, 1985 JAMES D. SHERMAN 206) 453-0300 WASNINGTON ANO CALIFORNIA BARS Renton City Council c/o City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re:Honey Creek Associates/Notice of Appeal (R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84) Dear Council Members: On behalf of the applicant with regard to the above-referenced applications, we hereby respectfully request that the City Council conduct an appeal hearingandreversetheJune7, 1985 decision of the Hearing Examiner to dismiss the referenced applications, as supplemented by the reconsideration decision dated June 24, 1985. The City Council recently considered appeals of the Examiner's decision on theHoneyCreekplannedunitdevelopmentandrezoneapplications. Based on theintroductionofnewandpertinentevidence, the City Council remanded these applications to the Hearing Examiner on May 6, 1985 for a further public hearing. Uponlearningoftheremand, the Hearing Examiner determined in a letter dated June 7, 1985, that the applications should be dismissed. The applicant, Honey Creek Associates, then requested the Examiner to reconsider his decision, but the Examiner has declined to do so. As a consequence of this sequence of events, the applicant has spent approximately one and a half years in processing these applications through the City of Renton and expended considerable sums and effort to obtain City approval, with the ultimate result being the dismissal of the applications without a decision on their merits. Subsequent to the remand by the Council to the Examiner, representatives of the applicant met with representatives of the Building and Zoning Department and it was mutually agreed that the existing lot line on the subject property should be relocated to conform to the two phases of development that are contemplated. The applicant, in reliance thereon, applied to King County to revise the location of the lot line and was informed that this process would take approximately 60to90days. The applicant then requested that the remand hearing be scheduledafterthelotlineadjustmenthadbeencompleted. This resulted in the dismissal of the applications by the Examiner. The applicant respectfully requests that the Council reverse the Examiner's dismissal of this matter for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has continuously pursued these applications in a diligent manner. CITY OF RENTON JUL 5 1985 1 CRY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton City Council July 3, 1985 Page two 2. The dismissal of the subject applications exceeds the authority of the Examiner and is inconsisent with the directions of the City Council members. 3. The dismissal of the applications was not in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 4-3013(E) in that there was no advance notice to the parties of record, and the decision was made in an ex parte manner. 4. The lot line revision will not result in any significant change to the current applications, and the record prepared thus far by the City remains pertinent to and a necessary part of the consideration by the City Council inultimatelydecidingtheseapplications. 5. Dismissal of these applications, followed by the immediate filing of new, nearly identical, applications, will result in a duplication of effort by the City staff, the City Council, the general public and the applicant. 6. Dismissal of the applications will require the applicant to prepare and refile essentially the same applications and submit new filing fees, thereby imposing a significant burden upon the applicant without any resulting benefit to the public. The appeal fee of $75.00 is enclosed herewith and we will look forward to receiving notice of the appeal hearing to be scheduled by the City Council. If the Council members desire more detailed information in advance of the hearing, we will be pleased to cooperate to the fullest extent possible. Very truly yours, LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN 46H NDRICKSON Jo n L. Hendrickson Ends. cc: Honey Creek Associates Johnson Braund Design Group JLH:jg 8-001 V CITY OF RENTON- No 11843 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTCN, WASHINGTON 98055 7/ O 19 !L) >_ RECEIVED OF AS 1 Ski.r W\ 4 t Nr1CKS0\ Prfin 1 P O1 A-Rr-tr f\c\rvI14C 9eCtSOn TOTAL 5OoReceivedby 7 LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN 8 HENDRICKSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW CURT D. BLAKE HONEYWELL CENTER PETER J. GLASE SUITE SOS JOHN L. HENDRICKSON 600 - IOBTH AVENUE N.E. PETER J. LUCAS BELLEVUE, WA 96004 MERRILEE A. MACLEAN DENNIS J. McLERRAN JOHN A. SEETHOFF" July 3, 1985 JAMES D. SHERMAN 206) 453-0300 WASHINGTON AND CALIFORNIA BARS Renton City Council c/o City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re:Honey Creek Associates/Notice of Appeal (R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84) Dear Council Members: On behalf of the applicant with regard to the above-referenced applications, we hereby respectfully request that the City Council conduct an appeal hearing and reverse the June 7, 1985 decision of the Hearing Examiner to dismiss the referenced applications, as supplemented by the reconsideration decision dated June 24, 1985. The City Council recently considered appeals of the Examiner's decision on the Honey Creek planned unit development and rezone applications. Based on the introduction of new and pertinent evidence, the City Council remanded these applications to the Hearing Examiner on May 6, 1985 for a further public hearing. Upon learning of the remand, the Hearing Examiner determined in a letter dated June 7, 1985, that the applications should be dismissed. The applicant, Honey Creek Associates, then requested the Examiner to reconsider his decision, but the Examiner has declined to do so. As a consequence of this sequence of events, the applicant has spent approximately one and a half years in processing these applications through the City of Renton and expended considerable sums and effort to obtain City approval, with the ultimate result being the dismissal of the applications without a decision on their merits. Subsequent to the remand by the Council to the Examiner, representatives of the applicant met with representatives of the Building and Zoning Department and it was mutually agreed that the existing lot line on the subject property should be relocated to conform to the two phases of development that are contemplated. The applicant, in reliance thereon, applied to King County to revise the location of the lot line and was informed that this process would take approximately 60 to 90 days. The applicant then requested that the remand hearing be scheduled after the lot line adjustment had been completed. This resulted in the dismissal of the applications by the Examiner. The applicant respectfully requests that the Council reverse the Examiner's dismissal of this matter for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has continuously pursued these applications in a diligent manner. CITY OF RENTON JUL 5 1955 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ) t = Renton City Council July 3, 1985 Page two 2. The dismissal of the subject applications exceeds the authority of the Examiner and is inconsisent with the directions of the City Council members. 3. The dismissal of the applications was not in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 4-3013(E) in that there was no advance notice to the parties of record, and the decision was made in an ex parte manner. 4. The lot line revision will not result in any significant change to the current applications, and the record prepared thus far by the City remains pertinent to and a necessary part of the consideration by the City Council in ultimately deciding these applications. 5. Dismissal of these applications, followed by the immediate filing of new, nearly identical, applications, will result in a duplication of effort by the City staff, the City Council, the general public and the applicant. 6. Dismissal of the applications will require the applicant to prepare and refile essentially the same applications and submit new filing fees, thereby imposing a significant burden upon the applicant without any resulting benefit to the public. The appeal fee of $75.00 is enclosed herewith and we will look forward to receiving notice of the appeal hearing to be scheduled by the City Council. If the Council members desire more detailed information in advance of the hearing, we will be pleased to cooperate to the fullest extent possible. Very truly yours, LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN H NDRICKSON Jo n L. Hendrickson Encls. cc: Honey Creek Associates Johnson Braund Design Group JLH:jg 8-001 OF RA THE CITY OFRENTONc)Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 in ea MEM T BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O Pco FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 17' FD SEPS O June 24, 1985 John L. Hendrickson LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN & HENDRICKSON Attorneys At Law 600 108th Avenue N.E., Suite #505 Bellevue, Washington, 98004 Re: Honey Creek Associates/R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Hendrickson: I have reviewed your letter of June 19, 1985 as well as other information in the file pertaining to this matter. I believe it would be a disservice not only to the applicant, but the general public who remain interested in this matter, to modify the order dismissing the subject application. As was pointed out in the letter, "it would seem more prudent for all parties to have the hearing convened subsequent to the conclusion of the lot line adjustment process." At that time the entire request could be reviewed as a cohesive project. If review were to occur at this time, and a lot line adjustment was achieved, modifications might be requested only requiring new staff analysis, new postings and publications, and new hearings. Rather than draw the process out over subsequent review hearings it would seem less confusing to have the entire project laid out for a thorough review in one clear proceeding. The public and the applicant will not be served by looking at a file which contains the original application, which according to the original decision erroneously applied an inappropriate standard for review. On top of that confusion would be grafted the confusion of shifting lot lines and the subsequent analysis by staff of a variety of configurations. A new application would present a clear picture of what property is involved, what are its configurations, what is requested, what densities are permitted, from where and to where are densities to be transferred, and what housing types may be permitted on the properties or property. In other words, a whole series of issues which are certainly unfocused as the request now stands. Therefor e, this office still believes that it would be in the best interest of the public and the applicant to dismiss the matter and permit a new application which clearly indicates what hE s been requested and clearly permits an analysis of the proposal without the baggage associated with the prior request. If furthEr assistance is necessary, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerel;,, FRED J KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Mayor Shinpoch L. Warren, City Attorney Euilding & Zoning Department Policy Development Department LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN 8 HENDRICKSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW CURT D. BLAKE HONEYWELL CENTER PETER J. GLASE SUITE 505 JOHN L. HENDRICKSON 600 - IOBTN AVENUE N E. PETER J. LUCAS BELLEVUE, WA 98004 MERRILEE A. MAC LEAN DENNIS J. MCLERRAN JOHN A. SEETHOFF• June 19, 1985 JAMES 0. SHERMAN 12061 453-0300 WASHINGTON AND CALIFORNIA BARS Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re:Honey Creek Associates/R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Kaufman: In behalf of the applicant with regard to the above-referenced applications, HoneyCreekAssociates, it is respectfully requested that the Examiner reconsider the dismissal of the referenced applications pursuant to the letter dated June 7, 1985. The applicant requests that the Examiner reconsider this determination for the basic reasons that the applicant does not intend to make considerable alterations to the applications, the applications remain within the bounds of the remand and the applicant is diligently pursuing the subject applications. Additionally, the applicant has expended substantial sums of time and resources in the subject applications, and a dismissal of the same would impose a substantial hardship on the applicant without any resulting benefit to the public. The City Council remanded the dismander to the Examiner primarily as a result of the discovery of the existence of two lots within the subject parcel. After discussion of this fact with the Building and Zoning Department staff, it was determined that the existing lot line should most appropriately be adjusted in location to correspond with the line separating the two phases, as originally proposed. The applicant initiated the lot line adjustment process after agreeing with the staff as to the location of the adjusted lot line. It was further agreed with the staff that the remanded hearing would be most appropriately convened subsequent to the conclusion of this process. This was not, however, a requirement of the applicant. If, in the discretion of the Examiner, time is of the essence, the applicant would have no objection to convening the hearing at an earlier date. Clearly, the applicant has no interest in delaying this matter or causing the City of Renton review process to extend any longer than necessary. Upon convening the remand hearing, the Examiner will be reviewing an application that is essentially the same as that previously reviewed. The proposed zoning, buildinglocationsandbuildingdesignremainthesame. The application originally proposed 99 dwelling units in Phase I, and it is estimated that at the remand hearing thisdensitywillbesubstantiallyreduced. Consequently, the impacts of the proposed development are anticipated to be less than originally proposed for Phase I. The focus of the Mr. Fred J. Kaufman June 19, 1985 Page two Examiner's initial review was on the first phase, as this was the only subject of the environmental review. This remains the case. It would appear that dismissing the current application and immediately reapplying would potentially be more confusing to the public in reviewing the records of this matter than if the current application was continued. The filing of second applications certainly will cause a substantial amount of duplication, both on the part of the applicant and the staff, as well as any interested members of the public. This would not appear to serve any party's interest. Additionally, the City will presumably require further application fees when, in fact, the applications would be essentially the same as the current ones, requiring little or no administrative review. In summary, the applicant is willing to proceed at an earlier date than previously requested, although it would seem to be more prudent for all parties to have the hearing convened subsequent to the conclusion of the lot line adjustment process. This matter is of particular importance to the applicant, and the applicant respectfully requests that the Examiner establish a hearing date to consider the current applications on remand as directed by the City Council members. Dismissal of current applications will only result in unnecessary duplication of effort and additional fees since the substance of the applications remains the same. Inasmuch as the Examiner made the dismissal determination on an ex parte basis and without advance notice to the parties, the Examiner may wish further information regarding the points raised herein. If such is the case, we will look forward to addressing any questions or concerns the Examiner may have. Very truly yours, LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN ikHE DRICKSO Jo L. Hendrickson cc: Honey Creek Associates Johnson Braund Design Group JLH:jg 8-060 RECEIVED JUN 2 01985 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER OF I y THE CITY OF RENTON a R. z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o ammo rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 9, 0 Co' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 June 14, 1985 SUBJECT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION, REZONE AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84) To Parties of Record: Following is an update on the status of the referenced applications. On May 6, 1985, the Renton City Council adopted a report remanding the rezone and PPUD applications back to the Hearing Examiner for public hearing to review new information relating to the status of legal lots and to assure that all parties who should have been notified of the various requests were so notified. Due to substantial modification necessary to the plans and lengthy delays predicted for review, the Hearing Examiner dismissed the rezone and PPUD applications on June 7, 1985, and required submission of a new application for processing by the City. The 10% petition for annexation is still pending and will await action by the proponents. If further clarification is required, please do not hesitate to contact the office of the City Clerk at 235-2501. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk cc : Mayor Council President Hearing Examiner Building & Zoning Department Policy Development Department p. c. &rt— OF RF 40 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR 235-2580 9,0 0, 9q- ED SEP1E. O P MEMORANDUM DATE: June 13, 1985 TO: Council President John Reed Members of the City Council FROM: Mayor Shinpoch Dear John and Councilmembers: A question was posed on the Council Floor (June 10) pertaining to theHearingExaminer's dismissal of a rezone application. Correspondence from Mr. Kaufman outlined his reasons for dismissingtheHoneycreekAssociationApplicationR-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. Councilwoman Mathews asked whether this also dismissed the annexation request. It does not. Mr. Kaufman does not have that authority. These applications were made concurrently, but the annexation application can stand alone despite the dismissal of the rezone application. Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor BYS:h cc: Maxine Motor Renton City Council 6/10/85 Page five Old Business continued Community Services be approved by the City before installation and can be Committee removed at the City' s request at any time. The Committee Maplewood Golf further recommended authorization for the Mayor, City Clerk Course Tee Signs and Park Board Chairman to sign the contract. MOVED BY continued KEOLKER, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Chairman Keolker clarified that the proposal approved by the Council would not be allowed under current City Code requirements ; however, the Maplewood property is still within King County boundaries. (Sign regulations in P-1 zone will be reviewed by Planning & Development Committee on 6/13/85 at 4:30 p.m.) Honey Creek Councilman Stredicke requested a periodic status report be Sewer Project supplied to Councilmembers on the Honey Creek sewer project to assess progress for purposes of lifting building moratorium. Honey Creek For the record, Councilman Stredicke submitted a letter from Associates Rezone Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman dismissing the Honey Creek R-014-84 aand Associates Rezone, R-014-85, and Preliminary Planned Unit PPUD-015-84 Development, PPUD-015-85, located in the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE, as a result of requirement of substantial plan revisions. The applicant has been directed to resubmit plans for review and public hearing. Councilwoman Mathews noted that an annexation was filed concurrently with the rezone and PPUD for the subject site; and questioned status of the annexation. Mayor Shinpoch will research matter. Status of LID 326 Councilman Stredicke requested a status report on LID 326, NE 4th Street widening of NE 4th Street between Monroe and Union Avenue NE. Mayor Shinpoch indicated plans to provide a report to Councilmembers at the Council workshop of all Public Works projects, but efforts will be made to provide the requested status report at the Council meeting of 6/17. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented Development a report indicating that the Committee has reconsidered an Committee amendment to the City' s Shoreline Master Program disallowed Shoreline Master by the State Department of Ecology, and recommended that Program Amendment the City Council hold a public hearing to amend the Shoreline Plan in a manner consistent with DOE mandates. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Shoreline Master Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented Program Variance a report indicating review is complete of the Hearing Examiner' s Policy letter of 7/2/84 concerning acceptable criteria for allowing variances to the City' s Shoreline Master Program. Although Council overturned one of the Examiner' s recent variance decisions, the Committee believes the Examiner is correctly applying the conditions for granting variances and the provisions of the Shoreline Master Plan. The Committee concluded that no further guidance is necessary for the Examiner at this time and recommended no action be taken by the Council . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second & final reading: Ordinance #3916 An ordinance was read amending Section 6-2401 of Title VI Criminal Attempt Police Regulations) of City Code related to conspiracy Ordinance to commit a crime. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. City Attorney Warren clarified the intent of the ordinance to thwart group shop lifting attempts. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: 1 O1 RE THE CITY OFRENTONvz MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 4, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 09 eco FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 AlTFO SEF TE O June 7, 1c,+85 RECEIVED PARTIES OF RECORD JUN 7 1985 CITY Of RENTON CITYCOUNCILRE: Honey Creek Association I have reviewed materials submitted to this office regarding the original application, as well as Lie decision of the City Council remanding the matter back to this office, and have deciied that the matter should be dismissed at this time. The matter was remanded to hear information relating to the status of legal lots and to assure that all parties who should have been notified of the various requests were so notified. Since the applicant is in the process of modifying existing lot lines, the Building and Zoni ig Department indicates that the various density provisions will be affected accordincly. The original application and the matters to be considered have been altered, or will be altered considerably, and are not within the bounds of the remand. A delay of up to 3 months might occur, and it will not serve the public interest to continue the matter any longer. Further, it is also apparent that the information in the application will no longer be accurate and a confusing record might well result. Since the matter is not being diligently pursued, and the premise of the original application is being altered, this office has determined that the matter should be dismissed (Section 4-3013(E)). A new application containing current information for review should be submitted and processed in the reuular manner. The applications, R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84, are hereby dismissed. If this of' ice can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, ll • FRED J. K UFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Mayor Shinpoch C ty Attorney Members City Council C.ty Clerk A.torney Hendricksen B gilding & Zoning Department R)licy Development Director R cord-Chronicle Renton City Council 6/10/85 Page seven Audience Comment AUDIENCE COMMENT Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, referenced Honey Creek Building & Zoning rezone and PPUD applications recently dismissed by the Department Report Hearing Examiner.`TTe asked that when the applications are scheduled for public hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon resubmission of plans, the Building and Zoning Department report be mailed to parties of record at least 10 days prior to the hearing to allow time for review. He advised receipt of the report only three days before the prior public hearings. Mayor Shinpoch agreed to discuss the matter with the Building & Zoning Department. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADJOURN. Time: 10:05 p.m. CARRIED. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk City of Renton Check Distribution Fund Total Checks MACHINE VOIDS: no.007229 - *07237 CURRENT 2C9,382.48 PARKS 42,779.57 ARTERIAL STREETS 29,888.03 STREETS 31,854.17 LIBRARY 4,608.55 GEN GOVT MISC DEBT SERV 1,306.23 STREET FORWARD THRUST 61,191.32 MUNICIPAL FACIL (SHOPS) 10,306.26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 18,647.44 WATERWORKS UTILITY 149,620.82 AIRPORT 24,397.33 SOLID WASTE UTILITY 181,278.68 GOLF COURSE FUND 10,552.26 WATER & SEWER CONSTRUCTION 253,643.10 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 31,143.74 INSURANCE FUND 1,462.16 Total of all Checks 1,062,062.14 We, the undersigned members of the Mays and Means Comp .tee of the Renton City Council, having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered, do hereby approve for payment Vouchers No. 7214 through No. 7494 in the amount of S1,062,062.14 has 10th dry of June 1985. Member =C-_Committee ChairmenL. Member lib 41110 OF RSA THE CITY OF RENTON it r MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 09gT60 SEPS„ 0- June 7, 1985 PARTIES OF RECORD RE: Ho ley Creek Association I have reviewed materials submitted to this office regarding the original application, as well as the decision of the City Council remanding the matter back to this office, and have decided that the matter should be dismissed at this time. The matter was remanded to hear information relating to the status of legal lots and to assure that all parties who should have been notified of the various requests were so notified. Since the applicant is in the process of modifying existing lot lines, the Building and Zoning Department indicates that the various density provisions will be affected accordingly. The original application and the matters to be considered have been altered, or will be altered considerably, and are not within the bounds of the remand. A delay of up to 3 months might occur, and it will not serve the public interest to continue the matter any longer. Further, it is also apparent that the information in the application will no longer be accurate and a confusing record might well result. Since the matter is not being diligently pursued, and the premise of the original application is being altered, this office t-as determined that the matter should be dismissed (Section 4-3013(E)). A new application containing current information for review should be submitted and processed in the regular manner. The app ications, R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84, are hereby dismissed. If this office can be of any further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, FRED J. K UFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk tuat7. i . cc: Mayor Shinpoch CITY OF Mco k umv City Attorney rjUN T 1985 Members City Council C:ity Clerk 12( CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Attorney HendricksenDBuilding & Zoning Department Policy Development Director Record-Chronicle Renton City Council 6/3/85 Page two Audience Comment Council reconvened at 8:50 p.m. ; roll was called; all members present with the exception of Trimm, excused. AUDIENCE COMMENT William Jens, 1136 S. 23rd Street, Renton, referenced The Luckey Company preliminary planned unit development applicant for the Luckey PPUD-008-85 Company, File No. PPUD-008-85, multifamily complex containing Victoria Hills) 196 units on 16 acres located south of S. Puget Drive, west of Benson Road S. and north of S. 26th Street. The matter was remanded by the City Council to the Hearing Examiner on 5/6/85 for consideration of additional information. Mr. Jens noted that the original plans for the PPUD, approved in 1977, expired on 5/24/85; however, the applicant had submitted revised plans to the City for review prior to that date. He requested direction regarding proper procedure to correspond with the City Council on this matter to which he objects. Mayor Shinpoch stated that correspondence should be directed to the attention of the City Clerk. Letters will be paraphrased for the record at a regular Council meeting as required by policy to allow both the proponents and opponents of the land use matter the opportunity to review the material . She further explained that since an appeal of the matter is pending, Council members are warned against ex-parte communication with parties of record since they are serving in a quasi-judicial capacity for the City as final decision makers in land use applications reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. Continued Councilwoman Mathews added that the matter of PUD plan submission has been referred to the City Attorney for clarification. Councilman Stredicke reminded Councilmembers that due to a potential violation of the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, he has removed himself as chairman or member of the Planning and Development Committee, and will be replaced by Council President Reed. The Committee will be chaired by Vice-Chairman Keolker for this subject matter. Gonzales Rezone Lawrence Campbell , 1609 South Central Avenue, Suite A-1 , R-003-85 Kent, requested Council address the ordinance for the Advance to Gonzales Rezone, File No. R-003-85 (1st reading on 5/13/85) . Ordinances & MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE Resolutions REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. CARRIED. Ordinance #3913 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of Gonzales Rezone property located at 135 Union Avenue NE from General R-003-85 Classification (G) to Residence District (R-2) ; Gonzales, R-003-85. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Councilman Stredicke objected to the rezone since he felt the intent of the Comprehensive Plan in designating the area for low density multifamily development was to allow mobile home park use, which would be compatible with predominant single family development south of NE 4th Street. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: REED, MATHEWS, CLYMER, HUGHES, KEOLKER. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Honey Creek Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, referenced Honey Associae% Rezone Creek Associates Rezone (R-014-84) and Preliminary Planned R-014-84 and Unit Development (PPUD-015-84) , consisting of 47.7 acres PPUD-015-84 located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE, rezone from G-1 to R-1 and R-2 to allow a two- phase multifamily development consisting of 185 units. Associated annexation request also submitted.) The matter was remanded to the Hearing Examiner by the City Council on 5/6/85 to allow input by King County residents to the east of the proposal and consideration of whether legal size of tax lots in the PUD would affect allowable density. He noted that the developers have requested a postponement in the hearing process to allow time to adjust tax lots within the area of the PPUD. Mr. Murray requested that the Hearing Examiner address only the specific issues assigned upon remand of the applications, or that the developer abandon the old application and submit a new request reflecting substantial changes. Renton City Council 6/3/85 Page three Audience Comment continued Honey Creek Mayor Shinpoch assured that the Hearing Examiner would Associates determine whether changes are of sufficient substance to R-014-84 and warrant submission of a new application. City Attorney PPUD-015-84 Warren confirmed that submission of a new application would be required to the Building & Zoning Department for review of plans which contain substantial revision. Mr. Murray referenced a memorandum from Zoning Administrator Roger Blaylock to Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman recommending delay of the remand hearing until developers are able to complete a lot line adjustment. He requested the opportunity to communicate his objections to that request to the Hearing Examiner. City Attorney Warren felt that Mr. Murray should be allowed to correspond with the Hearing Examiner on the matter. Following further discussion regarding lengthy time periods which occur between approval of preliminary PUDs and final approval and construction, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF LONG TERM PHASED DEVELOPMENT OT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Moore Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $5,000.00 filed by Margaret for Damages Moore, 615 South Williams, Apartment A, Renton, for personal CL 20-85 injuries allegedly incurred as result of tripping over sidewalk obstruction on Houser Way. Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Renton Airport City Clerk reported bid opening 5/29/85 for Renton Airport Water System Water System (W-804) ; 10 bids; Engineer' s estimate: Bid Opening 57,522.17 and $151 , 185.42 (Alternate) . Refer to Transportation Aviation) Committee. Tavern Ordinance City Attorney requested amendment of Tavern Ordinance to conform with State law relating to regulation of firearms in taverns. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Model Traffic City Attorney requested amendment of Model Traffic Ordinance Ordinance to delete sections duplicating provisions for driving while license suspended. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Six Year Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department requested Transportation public hearing be set for June 24, 1985, for consideration Improvement of update of Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Program 1986-1991 1986-1991 ) . Council concur. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, ADD REFER TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Boeing Company Public Works/Airport Department submitted Boeing Company Lease LAG 877-65 acceptance of lease rate adjustment proposal of $. 12 per square foot for the 1985 to 1990 period, effective 6/1/85. LAG 877-65) Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Marine Patrol Mayor Shinpoch submitted 1985 Marine Patrol Interlocal Interlocal Agreement with City of Mercer Island for continuation of Agreement 1985 service through 1985; Renton' s share of $22,015 to be paid on a quarterly basis. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Stromberg Rezone Hearing Examiner recommended Roger Stromberg Rezone, R-016-85 R-016-85, be approved with conditions; 0.78 acres located at 901 Sunset Boulevard NE from R-1 to R-3 for future construction of two nine-unit apartment buildings. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Schneider Homes, Hearing Examiner recommended Schneider Homes, Inc. Final Inc. Final Plat Plat, FP-021-85, be approved with conditions; 14.5 acres FP-021 -85 located on the south side of NE 6th Street at the 3400 block; 5.58 acre parcel zoned R-1 to be platted into 20 single family lots; remainder to be developed as multifamily complex. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. ffidD - «s — 6ezi 1 INTER—OFFICE MEMO TO: DATELISTEDBELOW DATE May 17, 1985 FROM: FRED KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER RE: HONEYCREEK REZONE AND PUD REQUEST FOR EXTENSION The attached letters are for your information. cc: Mayor Shinpoch City Clerk City Council Policy Development CITY OF RENTON MAY17it OF R4, 1 ec y,' o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT rY Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 oAl SEPS , t\ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrate 6 SUBJECT: Honeycreek Rezone and PUD/Files R-11E-04 & PPUD-1--1-5-84- I received the attached letter in todays mail requesting that the public hearing for the above items not be scheduled until the applicant can complete an adjustment to a lot line to specifically respond to the condition of the Environmental Review Committee to preclude development on the east side of the natural ravine. It appears that both the Building and Zoning Department in making a recommendation and the conclusions the Hearing Examiner reached, may be overshadowed by a technical error. Specifically that in the discussion of the PUD ordinance, we are dealing with a lot which is defined as a legal lot, and the legal lot did not conform to that area that the Environmental Review Committee had allowed the preliminary PUD to continue on. It would, therefore, appear reasonable to allow the applicant sufficient time to process the lot line adjustment through King County so that the lot corresponds to the area under discussion for the PUD. The staff has conducted preliminary evaluations of density for the revised lot and it would appear that there is an approximately a 20-25% reduction beyond what the Environmental Review Committee had limited the initial Phase I project to. The applicant would have to redesign the project to comply with the provisions of the slope formula. We should note that the applicant is now requesting the delay in the public hearing process and is not a result of either staff or Hearing Examiner scheduling. I will reschedule with formal postings, publications, and notifications to interested parties in the arnexation and rezone process after we have obtained a formal lot line adjustment from King County. RECEIVED MAY 17 1985 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants CiTY OF ;:ENTO:I 12 ie., May 15, 1985 MAY 16 1985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Mr. Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Honey Creek Rezone and P.U.D. Our Project #83-47 File: R-114-84, PPUD-115-84 Mr. Blaylock: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of last week, application has been made to King County for a lot line adjustment on the above referenced project. This action is in response to the Environmental Review Committee's request to limit development at the present time to the southwest portion of the site. Due to the lengthy (60 - 90 days) and rather unpredictable nature of the lot line adjustment procedure, we request that a new hearing date not be scheduled until the King County process is complete. Every effort will be made to keep the City informed of the progress. If you have any questions or you need additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. 762 Melvin R. Easter Landscape Architect MRE:smb cc: Bob Tomberg John Hendrickson Architecture, Enginccring &Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L. Allwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton,Washington 98055 206)271-7200 (206)623-5732 r Renton City Council 5/6/85 Page two Public Hearing continued Dochnahl 75% He reported a request of the Fire Prevention Bureau for Annexation Petition/ dedication of a 30-foot strip on the west side of 136th Bales-Denton Rezone Avenue SE to provide emergency vehicle access; and suggested continued inclusion of the requirement in the language of the ordinance approving the annexation. As an alternative, dedication could be required for any future development. Mr. Munson reiterated the departmental recommendation for approval of both the annexation and rezone; and establishment of a second public hearing on 6/3/85. Continued Upon inquiry, City Attorney Warren advised the Council right to deny the rezone at any point in the process up to adoption of the rezone ordinance. Policy Development Director Springer indicated that through the simultaneous review process, several options exist for approval of both the annexation and rezone, denial of both, or approval of the annexation and denial of the rezone. Regarding questions concerning access, he also reported that the Examiner had given thorough consideration to proposed access to the south of the McCann property and the proposal for additional right-of-way. Continued David Sitzman, 13024 SE 72nd Place, Renton, representing the petitioners, spoke in favor of both the annexation and rezone. He felt the proposed developments are consistent with development in the area and a natural extension of City boundaries. He indicated that through an oversight, owners of Lots 2 and 3 had not appealed Condition No. 2 imposed by the Examiner-- joint access agreement between the two lots required by restrictive covenant. City Attorney Warren confirmed that the appeal period for the Examiner' s report has expired. Mr. Sitzman noted that King County zoning for Parcels 3 and 4 allows business use; however, office park development as proposed would have less impact on traffic and surrounding areas. Continued Dennis Dochnahl , 10406 129th SE, owner of Lot 2, objected to the referenced joint access agreement since it would violate an existing lease held with adjacent Old National Bank, and would be unacceptable to both parties. Upon inquiry, Mr. Springer reported that if the annexation was approved and the rezone denied, G-1 (General ) zoning would be applied, and existing businesses would be classified as legal non-conforming uses since they conform to existing King County zoning categories. He also noted that rezone conditions for Lots 1 and 4 are acceptable to the proponents, and suggested that access questions on Lots 2 and 3 could be reconsidered by the Examiner. City Attorney Warren advised that the Council is empowered to accept, reject, or modify the Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation, or remand all or part of the recommendation back to the Examiner. Mr. Springer suggested that staff review the access question and offer solutions at the second public hearing. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL SET SECOND PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 3, 1985, FOR CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNEXATION AND REZONE, AND DIRECT STAFF TO ADDRESS ITEM 2 OF THE EXAMINER' S REPORT REGARDING ACCESS. CARRIED. Visitors Mayor Shinpoch welcomed former Councilwoman Margaret Proctor, Welcomed and exchange students from South Africa and Denmark. Advance to MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE Old Business REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORTS UNDER OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented Development Ia report regarding the appeals filed by the applicant and Committee citizen Mitch Murray on Honey Creek Associates Rezone (R-014-84) Hone .Creek and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD-015-84) . The ssociate i proposal , consisting of 47.7 acres located in the vicinity of R 014-84 the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE, is for rezone from G-1 PPUD-015-84 to R-1 and R-2 to allow a two-phase multifamily development Appeals consisting of 185 units. The Hearing Examiner had approved the RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting May 6, 1985 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF NANCY L. MATHEWS, THOMAS. W. TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, ROBERT J. COUNCIL MEMBERS HUGHES, KATHY A. KEOLKER, RICHARD M. STREDICKE. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHN W. REED BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY STAFF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE DAN KELLOGG, Assistant City Attorney; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LARRY M. SPRINGER, Policy Development Director; STEVE MUNSON, Policy Development Department; ALAN WALLIS, Police Chief; LEE WHEELER, Fire Chief; CAPTAIN JAMES BOURASA, Police Department. PRESS Jim McNett, Renton Record-Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 22, 1985, AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PROCLAMATIONS A proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared the period May 13 American Legion through 19, 1985 as American Legion Auxiliary Poppy Sales Auxiliary Poppy Week, to honor disabled veterans and urge donations for Sales Week poppies which benefit these veterans and their families. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Fire Recognition A proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared Saturday, May 11 , Day 1985, as Fire Service Recognition Day to focus attention on varied and technical services offered by fire departments in the United States and Canada and urge citizens to visit their nearest fire station on this date to become acquainted with staff, equipment and services. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Fire Chief Lee Wheeler expressed appreciation for the proclamation and noted similar proclamation presented by Governor Booth Gardner. He introduced Lieutenant Larry Eager, in charge of the event, and Firefighters Local President Bob Deines. Lt. Eager invited everyone to attend the three- day Fire Service Recognition Program, sponsored by the City of Tukwila Fire Department, at Southcenter this weekend. All fire departments will have displays and exhibits. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, Dochnahl 75% published and mailed in accordance with State and City laws, Annexation Petition/ Mayor Shinpoch opened the public hearing to consider the Bales-Denton Rezone Dochnahl 75% Annexation Petition and the Bales/Denton Rezone. R-105-84) Steve Munson, Policy Development Department , explained that Concurrent Review pursuant to Council policy, the annexation and rezone have Process been submitted for joint review by the City Council . This hearing constitutes the first of two public hearings required by State law, to be set at least 30 days apart. Council accepted the 10% annexation petition and authorized circulation of the 75% petition on 1/28/85 for annexation of approximately 13 acres located on the south side of NE 4th Street, east of Union Avenue NE and west of 138th Avenue SE. The rezone was considered by the Hearing Examiner on 3/19/85, and approval was recommended for rezone of Parcels 1 , 2 and 3 (3.37 acres) to Office Park (0-P) zone and Parcel 4 (.53 acres) to Business B-1 ) zone. The Examiner required several conditions: 1 ) site plan review for subsequent development; 2) prohibition of all but emergency access from Parcels 1 , 2 and 3 to NE 4th Street and requirement of a joint access agreement between Parcels 2 and 3; and 3) dedication of the easterly 30 feet of Parcel 4 for the widening of Duvall Avenue NE. Continued The scope of the annexation area and the four parcels proposed for rezone were pointed out by Mr. Munson on a vicinity map. Renton City Council 5/6/85 Page three Planning and Development Committee Report continued Planning and rezone and denied the PPUD on 3/4/85. The Committee has Development considered the appeals and along with other members of the Committee Council has received correspondence regarding this matter Honey Creek from citizens. This correspondence has been filed in the Associates Appeals record of the proceeding and all parties have been given an continued opportunity to rebut the substance. Continued Questions have been raised regarding the adequacy of the notice given of the hearing before the Hearing Examiner, particularly to residents living in King County who were parties of record to the 10% annexation proceeding under concurrent review by the City. In addition, the developer has presented new evidence of the existence of two separate tax parcels which would consist of legal "lots" as that term is defined in City Code Section 4-702(L) (4) . This new evidence may have bearing upon the matters at issue in the entire application, but particularly with regard to the allowable density pursuant to the steep slope formula set forth in Section 4-2709(4) (B) (2) . Continued Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council remand both applications encompassed within this appeal to the Hearing Examiner for reconsideration in light of the new evidence regarding the methodology for computation for the steep slope formula, as thus calculated. The Committee further recommended that the City Council request that the Hearing Examiner hold another public hearing, and in addition to City Code requirements for legal notice, notice of the hearing be mailed to all parties of record in this and the annexation proceeding. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Councilwoman Mathews requested that public notice be posted in several places on the east side of the property to alert King County residents of the hearing. CARRIED. John Hendrickson, Suite 505, Honeywell Center, Bellevue, attorney for the applicant , requested that the rezone not be remanded to the Examiner since there was no showing that an error in fact or law had been made and the rezone area complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site. Mayor Shinpoch explained rationale for remand of both applications, rezone and PPUD, to allow appropriate notice to all parties of record and King County residents adjacent to the site. Chairman Stredicke expressed opinion of the Committee that the rezone should not be separated from the PPUD in the review process. Continued Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE #2, Bellevue, Honey Creek Associates, explained diligent efforts to cooperate with City staff and meet City Code requirements in preparing plans, studies, and other data as requested by staff. He claimed that concerns expressed by the Committee have already been raised and addressed through the review process. The first, access, was thoroughly addressed, a traffic study was prepared outlininc multi-access alternatives, and the ERC had declared the access as non- significant. The second, R-2 zoning surrounded by R-1 , was determined to be the most environmentally sound. Third, proposed density of 182 units, or four units per acre, is less than allowed by any other zone. Fourth, the concerns over the steep slope can be addressed through PUD review and need not be addressed during rezone review. Mr. Tomberg requested approval of the rezone in lieu of remanding it to the Hearing Examiner , enabling density to be defined for the PUD. Continued Councilwoman Mathews noted that the applicant had chosen the concurrent review process for annexation, rezone, and PUD. Normally, each application is reviewed and approved separately during a much lengthier process. She felt the applicant was not losing time by settling specifics of the PUD at this point of the review and holding the rezone in abeyance. Following discussion, it was determined that the Committee report would stand as approved. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke requested Development to be excused from the Council Chambers during discussion of Committee the appeal of the Examiner' s report on Victoria Hills PPUD Victoria Hills PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council Members May 6, 1985 FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Honey Creek Appeal R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of Honey Creek Associates from the Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation dated March 4 , 1985, recommending denial of the preliminary PUD PPUD 015-84) , and the appeal by Mitch Murray from the Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation dated March 4 , 1985 recommending approval of the rezone (R-014-84) from G-1 to R-1 and R-2 . The members of the City Council have received correspondence regarding this matter from citizens which have been filed in the record of this proceeding and all parties have been given an opportunity to rebut the substance thereof . Questions have been raised regarding the adequacy of the notice given of hearing before the Hearing Examiner, particularly to residents living in King County. In addition, the developer has presented new evidence of the existence of two separate tax parcels which would consist of legal "lots" as that term is defined in City Code Section 4-702 (L) (4 ) . This new evidence may have bearing upon the matters at issue in the entire application, but particularly with regard to the allowable density pursuant to the steep slope formula set forth in Section 4-2709 (4 ) (B) (2) . Therefore, the Committee recommends that the City Council remand both applications encompassed within this appeal to the Hearing Examiner for reconsideration in the light of the new evidence regarding the methodology for computation for the steep slope formula, and the adequacy of the access to the area in light of the density as thus calculated. The Committee further recommends that the City Council request that the Hearing Examiner hold another public hearing upon notice, and that in addition to the legal notice as required by the City Code, that notice of the hearing be mailed to all of the parties of record to the proceeding, including this appeal, as well as to the parties to the proposed annexation of the subject i";-211a2 property to the City of Renton. AA zitj gey-Cle_i c--/ ktac- ,y IAl /.04 i1 OF R4,, THE CITY OFRENTONO MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, co CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 FD EEP-CE O P April 25, 1985 TC : Council President John Reed, and Members, Renton City Council FFOM : Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk i. RE : Concurrent Review Process for Annexation/Rezone - Notification of Public Hearings Mt . Thomas Malmoe, party of record during the Honey Creek 10% Annexation hearing held by the City Council in 1984 has indicated concern that he and others were not notified when the City held the rezone hearing on the same subject. He asks that the City Council address the notification procedures. (Letter referred to PI,3nninq and Development Committee on 4/22/85.) Currently, the City Clerk's office prepares legal notices for publication ard posting for annexation hearings. Likewise, the Building & Zoning Dopartment has responsibility for posting and publishing notices for rezones and other land use applications before the Hearing Examiner. Unfortunately, the Clerk's office is not aware that the rezone has been heard until after expiration of the appeal period and the file is transmitted to the Clerk or an appeal is filed. If the City Council decides to continue the concurrent review process fcr annexations and rezones, this office would be happy to develop a procedure for coordinated notification of public hearings held by both the City Council and Hearing Examiner. W ?. hope this clarifies the current practices followed by our dopa rtments. cr : Mayor City Attorney Hearing Examiner Building & Zoning Policy Development Planning and Development Committee 20 April 1985 City Council City of Renton Dear Committee Members, I am a party of record in the proposed annexation, PUD and rezone of the Honey Creek area, but because of a oversight in the city clerk' s office, I was not contacted until 18 April about the actions which have been occuring. Had I known that the hearing examiner was considering the rezone and PUD, I would have provided the following comments to him. If possible, I would like these comments read and entered in the record of the hearing, 25 April 1985. Because of the extremely short notification I had, I was unable to change my business travel schedule and may not be in town for the hearing. On review of the final declaration of insignificance and, as a result, the hearing examiner ' s report I found some incorrect information about the land use and actual location of the north- ern border of the area. Item 8 of the Environmental Checklist says that the land use category is UNDEVELOPED PARK. This is substantially incorrect on two counts. First, nearly two-thirds of the property adjacent to the area is single family housing while the remainder is undeveloped, privately held land. Secondly, the large map with the planned area outlined shows the planned area bordering 96th St. This is incorrect because the main thoroughfare is in fact 95th Wy and the planned area actually borders Paradise Estates subdivision. These same errors were unfortunately carried over into the examiner ' s report. Please note that as a result access to the northern R-1 area would have to be gained by transitting a residential area and not by turning onto property immediately adjacent to a thoroughfare. Also, a much smaller than perported area :. abuts undeveloped land. A comment was made in the 4 March examiner ' s report (top of page 2) about moving 15 units from the northeast portion into Phase 1 . Does this mean that the applicant proposes to build 15 units on the east side during Phase 1 or that 15 units which were scheduled to be built during Phase 2 will now be built on the west side during Phase 1? This is important because the applicant would not be able to secure the two accesses,primary and emergency, unless there was action in King County to condemn adjacent property or at least right of way through adjacent property. This point needs to be clarified in the minutes of your meeting. Lastly, I wholeheartedly endorse the examiner' s position in determining the density of development. The area to be developed is extremely hilly and unstable. Over populating can easily result in serious runoff and erosion problems. One only need look at the Devil' s Elbow to see the effects of erosion. This is of special concern because you intend to annex the area but not 120th Ave SE. Should the county be required to pay for road damage caused by changes in the runoff patterns in a city area? o; J red/ S >k-t..' 1 5- I am sorry that there was a problem with letting interested parties know what was liappenning. I hope that you have been able to resolve the problems of notification and public posting. Thank you,. 44.e.4 Thomas B. Malmoe 12105 SE 96th PL Renton WA 1 Attachment Extract of plat map 1 ~ 1t ' 14 J •i 1 Ii J — 1 11 PW A , ` i '-;-___.......-----"Cr- ''' .1. r-- n is--n. i'„ r is . ,.,i J v, J Q r.' 2 Q;,:•.,,,>___,...%., 'cv••• .t• '•121. 7 to t , Q , 10 • IIT 12A 13T E . ' 5i5. ` N Q 6O,4 1 0 • r IF 7n 7A In •In A, /JJ l" i.t i 1/7 \. U 0 • N ! 14•)3 70 4 Cr 0 Jo OwuoPt 0 , ir•t tit et 1 Y.[.7'0 Xt.ir •• • 1 J•v Js.p ssst J I. Red Samm PJ;inln9 Co. Inc. fi • 11.85 At. I\ 1 N fi psi ii_'t IG i j 1 51. I.Ir 0 co i C. 4' CO r Red 5omm Mining Go.\ Renton Ci':y Council April 15, 1985 Page two AUDIENCE COMMENT Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, read a letter Honey Creek requesting a two-week extension to the deadline of April AnDeals 14 for parties of record and interested parties to submit R-014-84 additional information regarding the Honey Creek appeals PPUD-1O5-A R-014-84/PPUD-105-84) . Mr. Murray stated he had discovered a mathematical error in the report from the Building Department to the Hearing Examiner which may reduce the proposed density from 179 units to less than 120 units. He also reported the possibility that all interested parties and parties of record had not received proper notification of the proposed rezone and PPUD. Councilman Stredicke reported that the Planning and Development Committee had scheduled the appeal hearing on this matter for 7:00 p.m. , Thursday, April 25 and Mr. Murray would be welcome to present his data at that time. Mayor Shinpoch indicated the City Clerk's Office would investigate the matter of proper notification to all parties. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Valley Office & City Clerk presented street vacation request by Valley Industrial Park Office and Industrial Park, Inc. , for Taylor Avenue SW Street Vacation and Maple Avenue SW between SW 19th and SW 21st Streets. Request Petition signatures represent 100% ownership of Taylor Avenue SW; 50% of Maple Avenue SW (remaining 50% owned by the City of Renton) . Refer to Board of Public Works and Utilities Committee. Human Rights and Mayor Shinpoch submitted reappointment of Mrs. Marilyn Affairs Commission Bingaman, 310 Williams Avenue North, to the Human Rights Reappointment - and Affairs Commission for a two-year term effective to Marilyn Bingaman April 25, 1987. Ars. Bingaman has served on the Commission since 1978. Other members are: Sally Carlson, Peggy Cummins, Toni Nelson, Glenda Williams, and Barbara Lansing. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. FAUS Funding Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department submitted Hardie Avenue SW/request for legislation to authorize allocation of FAUS SW Langston Road/funding for intersection improvements at Hardie Avenue SW Sunset Blvd. SW, SW Langston Road, SW Sunset Boulevard. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action) CONSENT AGENDA MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE APPROVED CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Gloria Longville Mehrens requested Council Housing consider adopting a comprehensive housing preservation Preservation ordinance to protect Renton citizens from being displaced Ordinance by increased commercial rezoning. Mrs. Mehrens' concern was prompted by the proposed rezone on South Tobin Street. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, THIS CORRESPONDENCE BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR APPROPRIATE ACTION. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Public Safety Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Public Safety recommending concurrence in the recommendation of the Committee Police Department to approve the new contract between the Humane Society City and the Humane Society, Inc. The Committee further Contract recommended the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract documents. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. April 15, 1985 Mitch Murray 283 NE 23RD Place Renton, Washington 98056 Phone: (206)237-8056 City Council The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Rei : A. Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner by the Building and Zoning Department, Honey Creek, (R-014-84,PPUD-105-84) , February 19, 1985. B. Report and Recommendation by the Hearing Examiner, R-014-84,PPUD-105-84) , March 4,1985. C. Notice of Appeal by Honey Creek Associates, (R-014-84,PPUD-105-84) , April 2,1985 D. Notice of Appeal by Mitch Murray, (R-014-84,PPUD-105-84) , April 3,1985 Dear Council Members: I hereby respectfully request a two week extension to the deadline for parties of record and interested parties to submit letters in support of their positions regarding the Honey Creek appeals (Ref . C. and D) . The deadline was April 14, 1985, which was 10 days after the date of filing of the appeals. I would like the deadline to be extended to April 28, 1985. There are two reasons for this request: 1 . I only recently discovered what appears to be a significant arithmetic error in the report to the Hearing Examiner from the Building and Zoning department dated February 19, 1985 (Ref. A) . I need two weeks to: a. obtain scale drawings from the Building and Zoning Department; b. to do detailed calculations involving the slopes of the subject site; c . to consult with the Building and Zoning Department and d. to draft a letter. The nature of the apparent error is such that it would reduce the proposed density, using the Building and Zoning department and the Developers slope method, from 179 units to less than 120 units. The resulting density of less than 120 would then be much nearer to the approximately 90 units recommended by the Hearing Examiner. This situation could effect the outcome of the Appeal process. 2. I have discovered only recently that the east side of the subject site was no-. posted to notify residences of the proposed Rezone and PPUD. Furthermore, parties of record involved in the Honey Creek Anexation hearings in early 1984 were not notified of the current rezone and PPUD hearings . I have talked, just today, with a number of residences in the eastern area and they have said they would like to have time to review the situation and to express their positions on the above appeals and on the Rezone and PPUD. Sincerely, Mitch Murray Renton City Council 4/8/85 Page two Audience Comment continued Audience Comment Julie Winters, 5051 Morris Avenue S. , referenced a letter received Constructive from City Attorney Warren. She claimed the letter stated that she Notice Filed and Oma Bergeron informed him they were agents for a plaintiff in a lawsuit against the City. She disputed that fact, and filed constructive notice with the City Clerk on Mayor Shinpoch, City Attorney Warren, and Police Chief Wallis declaring her rights. She said further action will be taken if that statement is not withdrawn. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Easement City Clerk submitted request from The Sunset Group, 11206 Exchange Des Moines Way S. , Suite 110, Seattle, to vacate an existing 233-251 Sunset utility easement located in the vicinity of 233-251 Sunset Boulevard N.Boulevard N. , which was recorded on 4/25/68. In exchange, a new utility easement will be granted to the City in the same vicinity. Refer to Utilities Committee. Honey Creek City Clerk submitted two appeals filed against Hearing Examiner ' s Associates recommendation on Honey Creek Associates Rezone and Preliminary Appeal Planned Unit Development, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84, by R-014-84 John Hendrickson, attorney for applicant, and Mitch Murray, PPUD-015-84 party of record; property located in the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE; 47.7 acres from G-1 to R-1 & R-2 to allow 185 units. Refer to Planning & Development Committee. The Luckey City Clerk submitted appeal filed against Hearing Examiner' s Company Appeal recommendation for The Luckey Company request for Preliminary PPUD-008-85 Planned Unit Development, File No. PPUD-008-85, by Michael M. Victoria Hills) Hanis, attorney for Victoria Hills Homeowners Association; property located on the south side of South Puget Drive, west of Benson Road South, and north of South 26th Street; 16.47 acres; 196 units within 19 buildings proposed. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Dragseth Claim Claim for damages filed in the amount of $50 (insurance for Damages deductible) by Rolf S. Dragseth, 1113 North 38th Street , CL 15-85 Renton, for windshield breakage allegedly caused by City snow plow (2/2/85) . Refer to City Attorney & insurance service. Pacific Northwest Claim for damages in the amount of 53,000 filed by Pacific Bell Clam for Northwest Bell , 1600 Seventh Avenue , Room 1813, Seattle, for Damages duct run and buried cables allegedly damaged during sewer line CL 16-85 installation at 2300 NE Fourth, Renton (2/13/85) . Refer to City Attorney & insurance service. Carlson Rezone Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive covenants R-002-85 of rezone application for Frances E. Carlson, File No. R-002-85; 5,720 square feet of property from R-1 (single family residential ) to L-1 (lightindustry) located at 211 SW 13th Street. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Planning Policy Development Department submitted draft ordinances for Commission Manufacturing Park (M-P) zone; Office Park (0-P) zone; Light Recommendations Industrial (L-1 ) zone; and Heavy Industrial (H-1) zone as on Draft reviewed and recommended by the Planning Commission following Ordinances public hearings held 11/9/83 and 2/13/85. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Agreement with Public Works Department submitted agreement between Renton Renton School School District No. 403 and City of Renton for cooperative District for improvement of Renton Vocational Technical Institute (RVTI ) Monroe Avenue NE frontage with City's budgeted Monroe Avenue NE overlay Street Project project; frontage to include Monroe from 850 feet north of NE 4th Street to NE 7th Street; NE 7th Street from Monroe to Kirkland Avenue NE; and Kirkland from NE 7th to 350 feet south of Jefferson Avenue NE. School District will reimburse the City for costs to develop the design and manage construction. Refer to Transportation Committee. Renton City Council l 4/22/85 Page five Ordinances and Resolutions continued Subdivision and Lengths; and Section 9-1108(24) (A) relating to Street Ordinance Widths and Lengths (Industrial Use) . MOVED BY CLYMER, Correction SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. continued ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. OrdinanLe #3902 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-2005(A) (7) , Mobile Home Park Chapter 20, of Title IV (Building Regulations) of the City Requirenents Code relating to mobile home park setbacks and repealing Sections 4-2006 and 4-2009 in their entirety. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3903 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-748(C) (5) , Chapter Conditional Use 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code relating Permit ;riteria to Conditional Use Permit criteria (parking) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL. ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3904 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-704 (C) (4) (1 ) , Side Ya -d 4-706(C) (4) (c) (1 ) , and 4-708(C) (4) (c) (1) , Chapter 7, Title IV Setback;Building Regulations) of the City Code reducing side yard setbacks in single family and two-family zones (G-1 , R-1 and R-2) from six feet to five feet. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3905 An ordinance was read amending portions of Chapter 7 of Recycling Title IV (Building Regulations) of the City Code relating Facilities to recycling facilities. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinan:e #3906 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification Carlson Rezone of property located at 211 SW 13th Street within the City R-002-85 of Renton from Residence District (R-1 ) to Light Industrial District (L-1 ) (Carlson Rezone, File No. R-002-85) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented the following resolution for reading and adoption: Resolution #2601 A resolution was read authorizing an Interlocal Agreement InterIccal with King County for street improvements on 87th Avenue Agreement for South (Taylor Avenue NW) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, 87th Avenue S. COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Reappointment Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report to Human Rights recommending concurrence in Mayor Shinpoch' s appointment of and Affairs Mrs. Marilyn Bingaman to the Human Rights and Affairs Commission Commission for a two-year period effective to April 25, 1987. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 6246 through 6550, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered. Vouchers 6254-6258 machine voided. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke advised receipt of a letter from Thomas Honey_(:reek Malmoe regarding the Honey Creek Annexation/Rezone hearings. Annexation/ City Attorney Kellogg suggested that the letter be presented Rezone/PPUD during the Planning and Development Committee of 4/25/85 when R-014-84 this matter is scheduled to be discussed. The Committee can PPUD-015-84 then determine whether the record can be expanded to include 1Mr. Malmoe ' s letter. He cautioned against including the letter in the record at this time because all parties to the annexation/rezone record are not aware of its contents. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, LETTER FROM THOMAS MALMOE REGARDING HONEY CREEK BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman has authorized the release of copies of the attached document to interested parties as long as the disclaimer below is shown on the copy. 4/16/85 BOEING COMPUTER SERVICES Remote Computer Services West P.O.Box 24346 Seattle,Washington 98124 206)763-5044 A Division of The Boeing Company Roger K.Greene Technical Specialist,RCSW Technology RECEI\IED This information was received 2/28/85, after hearing of 2/19/85, and willnotFEB $ 3 198S receive consideration in the Findings and CITY OF RENTpN Decision to be presented by the Hearing Examiner within 21 days of the hearing date. HEARING EXAMINER 94/11. For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # . 1 . AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING CityClerk 4/8/85 Dept./Div./Bd./Comm.For Agenda Of Meeting Date) Staff Contact Maxine Motor Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Twc Appeals of Hearing Examiner's Consent XX Recommendation; Honey Creek Associates Public Hearing Correspondence Request for Rezone and Preliminary Planned Ordinance/Resolution Unit Development; File No. R-014-84 and Old Business PPUD-015-84 Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. City 2Ierk's Letter Cette!• of Appeal from Honey Creek Atty. Other B. Lette • of Appeal from Mitch Murray Request for Reconsideration from Atty. C. Examiner's Response to Atty. Approval : Hearing Examiner's Report, 3/4/85 Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Planning and Development Committee Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Baciground information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Appeals filed on 4/3/85 by John Hendrickson, attorney for Honey Creek Associates; and by Mitch Murray, party of record, both accompanied by required $75.00 fee. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF Rfir 4110 , THE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o4110 rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, A CITY CLERK • (206) 235-25000, 9gTSO SEP"W‘° April 4, 1985 APPEALS FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON, ATTORNEY FOR HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES; AND MITCH MURRAY, PARTY OF RECORD, RIE : Appeals of Hearing Examiner Recommendation, dated 3/4/85, Honey Creek Associates Requests for Rezone and Preliminary Planned Unit Development; File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeals of Hearing E):aminer's recommendation have been filed with the City Clerk by both of the above-listed appellants, accompanied by proper fees of 875.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeals and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. Si icerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk OF RA, 4 THE CITY OF RENTON CJ O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 O' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 o94TF0 SEPcE• P April 4, 1985 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASH I NGTON) COUNTY OF KING ss. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 4th day of April, 1985, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail, to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON, ATTORNEY FOR HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. AND NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY MITCH MURRAY, same file number. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 4th day of April, 1985. Notary b.ltc in and for the State of Washincton, residing in Renton I HAVE RECEIVED THE CITY CLERK' S Nut IFICATION OF APPEAL ON HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY JOHN HENDRICKSON , ATTORNEY FOR HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES , DATED APRIL 4, 1985 CITY OF RENTG1.1 N2 10497 FINANCE DEPARTMENT fRENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 19 15 RECEIVED OF l/ ("='/[. /22 42( 14 j / lC'SLhj ylcll.GT?itJ (.c"e4:/1)1: Received by t/t` TOTAL J t April 3, 1985 Mitch Murray 2813 NE 23rd Place Renton, Washington 98056 Phone: (206) 228-2288 206) 237-8056 206) 237-4774 Renton City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 1 . I hereby file a Notice of Appeal , to the Renton City Council , with regard to thi? conclusions and recommendations contained within the Report and Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner dated March 4, 1985 regarding the Honey Creek area rezone and PPUD. Summa 'y of Appeal 2. In general I agree with the Hearing Examiner' s report except in the following regard. Specifically, I do not agree with the Examiner's recommendation number 1 . on page 10: "Approve the requested zoning for the subject site subject to the submission of a PUD for eventual development of the subject site, and subject to annexation of the site into the City." I recommend that the requested zoning be denied based on a gross violation of the Comprehensive Plan Document guidelines with regard to the size of the R-1 zones and the size of the G-1 zone. ice 1 - 3- Fs Errors of Conclusion 3. Conclusion No. 8. Error: "This R-1 zoning appears generally compatible with the designation in the Comprehensive Plan and again, it continues the existing single family zoning pattern west of the site to the site. " Correction: This R-1 zoning is incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan due to the fact that over half of the land area within the proposed R-1 zones is steep sloped. The Comprehensive Plan recommends development density of no more than 1 unit per acre in these steep sloped areas. R-1 zoning allows 6 units per acre and is therefore incompatible. 4. Conclusion No. 9. Error: "The G-1 zoning proposed for the Honey Creek stream course and ravine system appears appropriate. Under current zoning practice in the city, G-1 provides the least intense residential density criterium of any zoning district. It would be compatible with the other proposed districts for the subject site, namely R-1 and R-2. As proposed, it would serve to protect those areas designated greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan, and in that regard, it is quite compatible with the Comprehensive Plan." Correction: The G-1 zoning proposed for the Honey Creek stream course and ravine system appears appropriate. Under current zoning practice in the city, G-1 provides the least intense residential density criterium of any zoning district. It would be compatible with the other proposed districts for the subject site, namely R-1 and R-2. However as proposed, it would serve to protect less than half of those areas designated greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan, and in that regard, it is quite incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. - Discussion R-1 zone size: 5. Attachment A shows the requested zoning and elevation contour lines for the property. I have labeled the various zones A, B, C, D and E for discussion purposes. I believe that the R-1 zones A, D and E are much to large. 6. The Comprehensive plan document states on page 30: As a general rule, areas with slopes that average 25% or more should be designated as greenbelts. Development should be prohibited on slopes greater than 40%. In greenbelt areas with less than 40% slope, scattered single family development (at densities of one unit per acre or less) may be allowed - although clustering should be encouraged. In some cases higher residential densities may be allowed - if utilities and access are available - provided that at least 75% of the site remains in open space, that slopes are undisturbed and that development is clustered. " 7. Attachment B shows the areas within the proposed R-1 zones where the land slope is between 25% and 40% (light shading) and where the land slope is grea-,er than 40% (dark shading). Attachment B illustrates that the proposed R-1 zones (areas A, D and E on attachment B) have been made much larger than the Comprehensive Plan Document recommends - since they include within their boundaries large areas of land with more than 40% slope and also significant areas of land with slope between 25% and 40%. As indicated on attachment B, the total area of the proposed R-1 zones is 29 acres. 13 acres, (45%) of the 29 acres, is sloped more than 40%. 3 acres, (10%) of the 29 acres, is sloped between 25% and 40%. This leaves only 13 acres, (45%) of the 29 acres, with a slope less than 25% within the proposed R-1 zones. Thus only 13 acres, (45%) of the 29 acres within the proposed R-1 zones, is legitimate land for R-1 development. 3— 8. As quoted above i.. ,,aragraph 6. , the Comprehensive . .an Document specifically recommends that development be prohibited on areas with more than 40% slope. Therefore areas with more than 40% slope should not be included in R-1 zones. Also as quoted above in paragraph 6. , the Comprehensive Plan Document specifically recommends that unit densities should be limited to 1 unit per acre where slopes are between 25% and 40%. Therefore areas with slopes between 25% and 40% should not be included in R-1 zones. These areas should not be included in the R-1 zones since R-1 zoning allows 6 units per acre (Renton Code section 4-706 (C) 1 . ). 9. I realize that the Comprehensive Plan Document is merely a guide to development standards. Minor changes in land use compared to the Comprehensive Plan are acceptable and exact conformance to the Comprehensive Plan is not required. However, the above proposed zoning is a gross violation of the Comprehensive Plan guidelines. Specifically 45% of the land area being proposed for R-1 zoning is on very steep land (slope greater than 40%) where the Comprehensive Plan recommends a prohibition on development. Futhermore an additional 10% of the land within the proposed R-1 zones is sloped between 25% and 40% where unit densities should be limited to 1 unit per acre, and thus these areas do not qualify for R-1 zoning. 10. It appears that the requested R-1 zone sizes have been purposely made much larger than the Comprehensive Plan recommends solely to provide a unit density bonus for the planed PUD. Both the PUD ordinance Title 4 chapter 27 and the Zoning ordinance Title 4 chapter 7 do not say that it is alright to violate the Comprehensive Plan guidelines on land use zoning in order to provide a unit density bonus to a PUD. 4- -- 11 . I have been presvflued with the argument that: It alright to zone large areas of steep sloped land R-1 in violation of the Comprehensive Plan Document because the PUD ordinance contains a Steep Sloped Land Density Penalty (SSLDP) which will reduce the actual allowable density in these areas. This argument is fallacious for the following reason: The SSLDP is applied over the net area of the lot based on the average slope of the lot section 4-2709,4,B,2). The SSLDP may or may not result in the allowable density being no greater than that recommended in the Comprehensive Plan Document depending on the exact nature of the land. 12. The following example shows how the argument presented in paragraph 11 . is fallacious: Consider a parcel of land that lies partially within a single family land use area and partially within a greenbelt land use area on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element map. Assume that the land has a total area of 30 acres. Assume that 10 acres is level , 10 acres is sloped 26% and 10 acres is sloped 41%. The Comprehensive Plan recommends a maximum unit density of 6x10=60 for the level part (using 6 units per acre for single family residential ) , plus lx10=10 for the 26% sloped part plus Ox10=0 for the 41% sloped part. Thus the recommended maximum allowable density is 60+10+0=70 units according to the Comprehensive Plan Document. On the other hand, if we assume that the entire 30 acres is zoned R-1 in disregard for the Comprehensive Plan and we then apply the SSLDP we obtain the following: The gross area reduced 20% for internal circulation (section 4-2709,3) would be 30-( .20)x30=24 acres. The average slope of the lot is (10x0+10x26+10x41 )/30=22%. The SSLDP is (22-15)x2=14%. And thus the allowable density would be 24x6=144 minus 14% due to the SSLDP or 144-( .14)x144=124 units. Thus the allowable unit density gotten by improperly zoning large areas of steep sloped land R-1 and then applying the SSLDP is 124 units which is much larger than the 70 units that are recommended as maximum in the Comprehensive Plan Document. 13. The above example is not an extreme case - there are many other examples where the allowable unit density gotten by incorrectly zoning large areas of steep sloped land R-1 and then applying the SSLDP is much larger than the Comprehensive Plan Document recommends. 5 - 14. -he above paragrdpris 11 , 12 and 13 point out the raL;t that the only effec-Ave way of maintaining compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Document, with regard to maximum allowable unit densities, is to properly apply the zoning rules. The proper way to apply the zoning is to do what the Comprehensive Plan Document says - by not including large areas of steep sloped land within R-1 zones. G-1 zone size: 15. attachment C shows the recommended land use guidelines from the Land Use Element map from the Comprehensive Plan Document. The Comprehensive plan document states on page 29: Greenbelt An area intended for open space, recreation, very low density residential uses (generally at a density of less than one unit per gross acre), agriculture or other compatible low density use. Greenbelt areas are characterized by severe topographic, ground water, slope instability, soil or other physical limitations that make the areas unsuitable for intensive development. Provisions for public enjoyment of greenbelt areas are encouraged; however, greenbelt designations do not imply the right of public access. " 16. The Hearing Examiner' s Report under Conclusions paragraph 9. states: The G-1 zoning proposed for the Honey Creek stream course and ravine system appears appropriate. Under current zoning practice in the city, G-1 provides the least intense residential density criterium of any zoning district. It would be compatible with the other proposed districts for the subject site, namely R-1 and R-2. As proposed, it would serve to protect those areas designated greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan, and in that regard, it is quite compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. " 17. I agree that G-1 the proper zoning for the "st«am course and ravine system". However the proposed G-1 zone protects only 12.7 acres of the ravine system. The total area within the ravine system where the slope is greater than 25% is approximately 29 acres. Also the Land Use Element map shows a greenbelt area of 29 acres. 18. Again, I realize that the Comprehensive Plan Document is merely a guide to development standards. However the above proposed G-1 zoning of only 12.7 acres out of a greenbelt area of 29 acres is a gross violation of the Comprehensive Plan guidelines. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED 19. I request that the requested zoning be denied based on a gross violation of the Comprehensive Plan Document guidelines with regard to the size of the R-1 zones and the size of the G-1 zone. Sincerely, 7Z(. Mitch Murray Attachments: A, B, and C. 77 VICINITY MAP I I+I\ I 1 •.. l-'. 1 r'/i it• ilA0.4L'* ip dIUY n1I fit A *\1‘ I I( 1 11 \ I — 7 11: -, l'-- I), \\H‘ \\% 14 ii ---.—‘ -.. 1 i 1 „ \ \ N i I, r!r r•;w \ i1 k4s s ''' 1\ \1 i N V\ \‘ \\\ \ \\ 7(------ ), ‘ N V \ i/h/(/ N 1 N \ . \` ___-------- - - 7__yzr l ' s'\ N' '. \\ '— ' 1.1)''' 2 11 i —1 II I sz--- ---- --- - -. 7 '''' v,-.,_- avin----u \ \ ILl ' /N 11 q\\ki,t r_ , k„ a 41 . r\ 1 / 1". 01\ Y. sirI . i, 'Ik', t • A ‘ \ i 22r)' 1 '4 -- 1:, \ N'',\% \\\ 1, mi A\ , 5„, i ,— /. \.MA\t,\ r I 01! --c \s .-xij \, i' s•\ \* r,_?' Th,) 1,> A R! !! 0 i—i I t- 1 r f i I L\ Th-7o (ii !\ .. clIIICi...--7 -;-;) \\ \_'. - \\ \,\: . , _.---.-_7(-- m 1 i i 1 0 ° ftLIIJ OT 0 c4 ,.M PA.k 0 _ -11(0)_10 D=V to G CCt J t OC]D Mll°a R-rrA c H M NT A I) i' )) I II - 1 ,,, ., I__ Irk...... _ li 7,_ l.,, 7:\ , i,: I 1 •.. Aw. rMr r wrr id 1 k‘ 7;":". ,,, 1. 411111111 :: 1 1 i ! 1 1:\' 7/ '' 7 PaPiling P- 1 tame P% i\ pOr 4 7 1 11 C 1r Z I \ li Lyx, r• I I 11 i \\ ' t 1\ r) 14. 111 i \‘ ,1 \ b A 1! O jiks N •';?).'''. 1•\ It.; •• L''' 4 ' 7---\ 10071. 1 INTIMINVIr 4,( k,-..-.,,, ivp 1, 111411641S., - 71/4- 46, ." 1:44::. l':%.'" ' \\' . ‘ NN ''-- ----- \\\ ‘\' 444.\\\ :\ '':\\\ jilt:: -. " '"' Ir''.-- 1-7-' ' 1''''..?„;›, s` k.,\\\ 1' ell 51. 4TE k''':!" *--. ,',., A , itiri. 4:* , iIR. i: ''..: .., 7"-" ?.', 0e:/,, ieb# 01°‘ fr \. 4, We 2 5- 407.: i- qv) .' 0, 40. \ \\ A\ *.\ \ '‘ . ,. t . ‘:: ‘: s2::::: „.. 2„_..;;, e,,,,,,; , i ." •. s.,,, ,,,, ,, . t'; ith,, 71 . 1k- ' *.-" m: 1''''' ') telatoov,.:,„, y.,;• mr.. ..-__:„..",:;• 10, i ,, 1 L1) A nik \ Aripi\ I( I 1 v M M Mcr- r:. i: --- 1' 1! \ s' O. ri' At 1 I I/ 1 ± 4 01 LA Y ., 1 ' K .} to N 1:-. i= clii ' ANS. , 7---- V `. N \' t \ ‘ i, 4V1: 40, -, 3' 4C p I 1 a 1 si r . \\ \ 111, ) ' ww 1. VI N v 1:,%\ J J I 1 rIVIV: 4§./..?".? ' 0; cidi , it; Zj(ii 4a1 li . c-el I a_ ii_ 4: 1 I- fir/ llr ' F" O J 1, 1114 A ,,:_=‘!.,:.-..-- • - ,,,*- 1., A I- '_.:.,-- ziF-.' , 4; 1 i 1 I J LI l U cL o.... v. ni:', 7. 4!""' AA i , k 1 Th 7 il 1 0 ., L.--; 4 4. t7SN, V k - \ ; z-_---,, 1 ' ‘. '\ k Z r ra 11 abr •. • - i usee J J s 0 ° EJtu 1TDI11 =/ ii R 0 cra_ 13 LArojo, cA__:_ j_ Jv 1 L- L g•NsED ON LA E-LC_M'N ' MAP p_o M coM PREN ENS1 lE PLfr N bOCL ANT SINGLE I VAM L.Y s.s Ac RaS ) r-- T GRZEN BELT 29,41- A, cRas) SING L F N11LY tl, A c aBS) 1—co.Ka D E N S I T Y Al LTI— AMiLY 4,9 Ac QTrs) scALE : 22_4 FTAa A T'T Ac.4 M i_N'f C CITY OF RENTON No 10490 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 3 19 d" RECEIVED OF ClcC!.; :_: 11 , i'f/Z. ,,t4 r E''<¢L z//[" iirzrS El G,2les? l L Received by TOTAL j , I c LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN 8 HENDRICKSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW CURT D. BLAKE HONEYWELL CENTER PETER J. GLASE SUITE 505 JOHN L. HENDRICKSON 600 - I08TN AVENUE N.E. PETER J. LUCAS BELLEVUE, WA 98004 MERRILEE A. MAcLEAN DENNIS J. McLERRAN JOHN A. SEETHOFF' JAM ES D. SHERMAN April 2, 1985 206) 453-0300 WASHINGTON AND CALIFORNIA BARS City Council The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re:Honey Creek Associates PPUD-015-84)/Notice of Appeal Dear Council Members: In behalf of the applicant with regard to the above-referenced matter, we hereby respectfully request that the City Council conduct an appeal hearing and reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated March 4, 1985, as supplemented by the Reconsideration decision dated March 20, 1985. The Council is respectfully requested to consider the following substantial errors in fact and in law made with regard to the PPUD application: 1. The City has modified the manner in which it interprets and applies the slope formula in Section 4-2709(4)(B)(2) during the processing and review of the PPUD application. While certain City officials have imposed the constraints of the slope formula to exclusively the steep slope areas, others have applied the formula to the entire property, irrespective of the actual slope. This has the result of reducing the permitted density of this 47.7 acre site from 185 dwelling units to approximately 90 dwelling units. The applicant contends that the change in interpretation and the inconsistent application of the formula are procedurally and substantively incorrect and contrary to the due process and equal protection rights of the applicant. 2. The City Council in reviewing the record prepared with regard to this application, does so in a quasi-judicial manner. The Council, therefore, should give great weight to the construction of the slope formula applied by the Policy Development Department (PDD) during the approximately one and one-half year review of this project. The PDD interpretation, which applied the slope formula exclusively to the steep slope areas of the subject property, was consistently and uniformly followed by the City until the Hearing Examiner hearing. As a quasi-judicial body, the Council should follow the interpretations of the administrative officials of the City. 3. It is evident that the Code section in question is inherently ambiguous in that it has resulted in contrary interpretations by different City officials, as well as other professionals involved in this matter. In order to eliminate cl- 3 - City Council The City of Renton April 2, 1985 Page two the ambiguity, and to avoid future similar disputes, the Council may wish to amend the formula to clarify its intent and simplify its application. This, however, should be in a prospective manner and not on an "ad hoc" basis during the processing of an individual application. The applicant has justifiably relied on the interpretation conveyed to it by City officials from the outset of this application. As a result, the applicant has expended substantial time, energy and resources in bringing this application to this stage. Therefore, the Council is urged to stand by the original interpretation of the slope formula rendered by City officials, and to approve the PPUD as submitted. The applicant respectfully requests that the Council establish a hearing date with regard to this matter, at which time the foregoing points, and others, may be more fully addressed in order that the Council may render a final decision on this matter. This appeal pertains solely to the application referenced as PPUD-015-84. Very truly yours, LUCA , LASE, SHERMAN NDRI KS N Jo In L. Hendrickson cc: Honey Creek Associates JLH:jg 8-046 r -7 ... — fv S.N3W .I_, . 7„ a7„ ( 0 ]- A CoNc i A a o o J1JjJ77 i-r n. L I 11,,,Iji k; ;___\ \\\\ A ( ( tL-- --:----7.—I=- 7--- 52------- I . !I : 2 I; :tL;----- c- .) \VN \ 1 ' 1 -‘,":), . 7-7- 0 is' 4 ''\‘‘k,, ‘ . cr7-- s- .- e- N ‘,41. 1 4 1 f /r-1 w\‘i.10. Eiti 11111 \ ' I I : •\ \.., I1Ibi1l I\ 13 C 1 z '/' / 7)/* N • 1% 111(1 it_t- ' 471• V -= 7"--' Ir'--1'''P \\ 11 i ''‘ r I I et 0 Th \it 1 k k* L-s,\ - \ ' l("' (-- -- ---/---- 77----.-_ 1 .4' - r:--- ---- NN A \ N .'\ f)//// - -- 1,,, x- i-i' 0'\k\r\‘ Th ( 1 \q‘ \ yl. '\ '.\-''' '.: i I ( 744N) i\ ! R rI ---• I] n\t icl,,, r 1 i \ 11# j , Nt-- t1-'9 ..... i 11Lc-_-_71-7- -- ii j ‘, 1\ : i 7=,( \7 :-.i.,, 4. 771_,,- 11111',1 ( 11 I 9.. vw J L NDU ... F.'e11: 1 , z ,, ___ -- --m---- ----.-r— ii 1 14er Ka In ' 1M I I Rabbi R-1. M r_.r I iLd m......._ . 4_i ft.i__ 7 E 7-- • ,\ ' • ,`1/," - ', 7 r/ , ,, ......::: ---- ---:, ftG.:::1- - '- 1 --- ---- --: 7:: _ -__ 7() .4 ( z ',//.e r---n (CY f: 7 , i -- a , ,)." ' 'i awl urols of al 1 E Lut 1--- F ovt, 4,fq i. _:_..., --- --_____..,.. ..... _,/. ......././ 7 zi 4 ____..., ----\ q1/4...vt. r-\___)/ jr; ,„_ ____,1......111) I j ,...P q r 4' i (.,1Vti x ,6----_,.2---------__.--_-__________ __ ..,<- r/ P-4°N --- „: \ 11, \ : jii, '',,..1.3.1 I -NA\-\--‘%-\ 2.,- -,------,-- ._::::-,-0., q, i ,, i . 51.Aiel 8,, N._\\. ,.._).. 17.) 7---': 1-- . :,::>.;:."-->117.; cr-.:-----\ ''... \\.‘ 2-:-------- I- I ' 7 .,-,-;. 0----'-"°''' ..--"/‘1 ZONE -- s' '''‘. IE1CABOi, - i//, , 1. 0°I....„ 7 4 1k;r-.- V 7.-- 7- - ' _______________,„, 1 1., i i J11 1 11 O.. x oo k I n.i ffilSvw„, 1 s ‘ •\ 1\‘ i..- "---s,_ 1ii. p, /e ( vo 01‘4,,%.,N.,. ., . -,. e- 4 111 4.3710) a•-:-.M.' 01,iiil • r- - 44- R'1 fah - 5TAT15TIC5 R Ili%% a E4 --R EA WiTH N R-1 b w/ 19 a`\ LAND FRCP, S-opEL > +0% 13 AcR_S ' 3o T i ___r_7_ ,... H R d di LP b P.REA 5Lbpsfl ZS o-9'O /o 3 ACRES 2 3 LAND p cfi SI_bP f L ZS 0 1 3 A RCS ry ut V N If31— rr - 'j TO R-1 f A 2`1 ACRES O f I BAs51) oN LAWS LA- - = E-LSM'NT MAP goM coM PR-EH ENSUE PLAN bocUM 'NT 5'N G LE 6 Ac ReS ) s GR ZZN B ELT 2_9.4 A c&es) S+N•; L F Ani )LY 1-4, gceas) 1 I Low pENs TY i,4LTI— Or 49 AcQs) scALE = 22-G FTA f T'TAc.4 M E N'f C CITY OF RENTON No 10490 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 3 19 d15- RECEIVED OF eicC/`-;. .41(`-'2r. : .S/ a ""6 )L-' ice ,1 ; 'e i /ere (A( i'lr '_C 7ilr 4 114'7'1//LC hi- It/L ee,2(!<L%7J h6 Received by 'l TOTAL 75 tG; t s LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN £3 HENDRICKSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW CURT D. BLAKE HONEYWELL CENTER PETER J. GLASE SUITE 505 JOHN L. HENDRICKSON 600 - 108TN AVENUE N.E. PETER J. LUCAS BELLEVUE, WA 98004 MERRILEE A. MAC LEAN DENNIS J. McLERRAN JOHN A. SEETHOFF• April 2, 1985 206) 453-0300 JAMES D. SHERMAN WASHINGTON AND CALIFORNIA BARS City Council The City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re:Honey Creek Associates PPUD-015-84)/Notice of Appeal Dear Council Members: In behalf of the applicant with regard to the above-referenced matter, we hereby respectfully request that the City Council conduct an appeal hearing and reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated March 4, 1985, as supplemented by the Reconsideration decision dated March 20, 1985. The Council is respectfully requested to consider the following substantial errors in fact and in law made with regard to the PPUD application: 1. The City has modified the manner in which it interprets and applies the slope formula in Section 4-2709(4)(B)(2) during the processing and review of the PPUD application. While certain City officials have imposed the constraints of the slope formula to exclusively the steep slope areas, others have applied the formula to the entire property, irrespective of the actual slope. This has the result of reducing the permitted density of this 47.7 acre site from 185 dwelling units to approximately 90 dwelling units. The applicant contends that the change in interpretation and the inconsistent application of the formula are procedurally and substantively incorrect and contrary to the due process and equal protection rights of the applicant. 2. The City Council in reviewing the record prepared with regard to this application, does so in a quasi-judicial manner. The Council, therefore, should give great weight to the construction of the slope formula applied by the Policy Development Department (PDD) during the approximately one and one-half year review of this project. The PDD interpretation, which applied the slope formula exclusively to the steep slope areas of the subject property, was consistently and uniformly followed by the City until the Hearing Examiner hearing. As a quasi-judicial body, the Council should follow the interpretations of the administrative officials of the City. 3. It is evident that the Code section in question is inherently ambiguous in that it has resulted in contrary interpretations by different City officials, as well as other professionals involved in this matter. In order to eliminate 6c '6( cI - 3 -F izzi auk_ City Council The City of Renton April 2, 1985 Page two the ambiguity, and to avoid future similar disputes, the Council may wish to amend the formula to clarify its intent and simplify its application. This, however, should be in a prospective manner and not on an "ad hoc" basis during the processing of an individual application. The applicant has justifiably relied on the interpretation conveyed to it by City officials from the outset of this application. As a result, the applicant has expended substantial time, energy and resources in bringing this application to this stage. Therefore, the Council is urged to stand by the original interpretation of the slope formula rendered by City officials, and to approve the PPUD as submitted. The applicant respectfully requests that the Council establish a hearing date with regard to this matter, at which time the foregoing points, and others, may be more fully addressed in order that the Council may render a final decision on this matter. This appeal pertains solely to the application referenced as PPUD-015-84. Very truly yours, LUCA , LASE, SHERMAN NDRI KS N Jo in L. Hendrickson cc: Honey Creek Associates JLH:jg 8-046 W 1 0805E March 4, 1985 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPLICANT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES FILE NO. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 LOCATION: Vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of joint land use actions to allow rezoning of 47.7 acres of property from G-1 to R-1 and R-2; and a Preliminary P.U.D. for a two-phase multi-family development consisting of 185 dwelling units. The first phase of the P.U.D., located on the south side of Honey Creek, will consist of 99 dwelling units. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval of Rezone and PPUD, with conditions. Hearing Examiner Recommendation: Rezone is approved. PPUD is denied. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on February 12, 1985. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 19, 1985, at 9:05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing proof of posting, application, and other documents pertinent to this application. Exhibit #2 - Topographic Map Exhibit #3 - Preliminary P.U.D. map showing 99 units. Exhibit #4 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #5 - Preliminary drawing showing S.W. corner of site reference emergency access between Harrington and proposed Jefferson St. extension. The hearing was opened with the above exhibits being placed into the record by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. Mr. Blaylock continued with a presentation of the staff report for the applicant. It was noted that the applicant applied for 185 units, with the ERC approving only 99 units based on services and access available to the northeast portion of the site. It was estimated that development for the northeast portion will take place within 5 to 10 years. The rezone would consist of G-1 zoning on 12.7 acres; R-1 on 29 acres; and 6 acres of R-2 zoning. The first phase of the project will consist of 99 units in the southwest portion of the site. Mr. Blaylock stated the R-2 area in the proposal does not specifically comply with the Comprehensive Plan due to the topography of the site. The R-2 portion is approximately 75 ft. lower than the adjacent single-family area, thereby placing these units on a plateau. The ERC expressed concern about the properties to the east of the site because even though the areas are platted, they are undeveloped, have no sewer or water, and city services to access that area would be difficult due to the need to bypass a large ravine. Because of the ravine, travel time from one side of the development to the other is more than 20 minutes. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA-, R-014-84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 2 Timeliness was discussed, and Mr. Blaylock stated the south and west portions are timely, but the north and east portions are not. It is believed the rezone request does meet with the intent of the rezone criteria, and is therefore recommended for approval. The preliminary P.U.D. is requested to allow 185 units on 47.7 acres, utilizing 99 units as the first phase on the southwest corner of the site. Another Preliminary P.U.D. hearing will have to be held on the second phase, when and if development takes place on the northeast portion of the site. It was clarified that approximately 15 units are being moved into Phase I from the northeast portion of the site. This Preliminary P.U.U. is covering the whole site of 47.7 acres, not just the portion being considered as Phase I. There will be 5 townhouse units in Building J, 4 in Building H, and 4 units in Building I. Open space requirements are met as well as the minimum area requirement of four (4) acres. There is a portion of property that will be dedicated to the City for street right-of-way for the extension of Jefferson Street. This portion will begin at the present northern boundary of Jefferson Street and extend to its connection with 23rd Street. Mr. Blaylock reviewed the density calculations, slope reduction and use reduction information per a chart contained in the staff report. It was noted that the total development capacity for the entire 47 acres is 179 units. Mr. Blaylock continued with the review stating there was an issue with the development as to whether or not there is enough access to allow 99 units in the southwest corner of the site. The proposal, as now presented, would make the primary access Jefferson Street, with another access at N.E. 21st Street (going north to N.E. 23rd Pl. or 23rd Street, through single family residential areas). From the 99 units it is anticipated there will be approximately 600 vehicle trips per day. The ERC did not feel the impact was significant enough to prohibit the project. Mr. Blaylock stated, most arterials carry around 25,000 trips per day, usually going in two different directions. He discussed the steep slopes and slope instability resulting from initial construction. Hydroseeding will be necessary, with additional planting at certain times during construction. The City is to construct the main sewer line with access on Jefferson Avenue N.E. and the tie-in at N.E. 21st. A 20 ft. wide, gated emergency tie-in would be located at N.E. 23rd Street. Mr. Blaylock stated the City Council wants to hear the Preliminary PUD and the rezone together because this is a unique site, and they wish to determine if the design will affect the rezone, which in turn would affect the proposed annexation. Staff recommends approval of both requests. Calling for testimony in support of the application from the applicant or their representative, responding was: Greg Diener Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Diener advised the Examiner that they are aware of the concerns regarding traffic in the area. He feels they have worked diligently to find solutions to the concerns expressed regarding topography of the land. They feel they have an access that will minimize the negative impacts to the surrounding, existing single family neighborhood with regard to the suggested traffic impacts to the area. He also feels the concerns of steep slopes and drainage can be addressed at the time the building permits and FPUD are submitted. He acknowledged there have not been any slope stability studies, boring or soil studies made on the site as yet, but there will be in the future. Soils now are sand and gravel which is good because they do not retain moisture. He had no further comments at this time. Further responding for the applicant was: Bob Tomberg 5611 - 119th S.E., #2 Bellevue, Wa., 98006 Mr. Tomberg addressed what he felt was a conflict in density calculations. He stated their calculations and feasibility studies were based on the initial calculations of the previous Policy Development Director, and made a plea that the calculations be accepted as those presented. The Hearing Examiner stated he is bound by the City Ordinance and not by the preliminary or initial interpretation of the density calculations. Mr. Tomberg stated much time has been spent with the City to deliniate just what was going to be accepted in this proposal. He stated the original presentation to the City was for 330 units. The City came up with calculations for 185 units and the applicant has reduced that figure to 178. Mr. Tomberg had no further testimony. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony in support of this proposal. There was no one else wishing to speak. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA R-014--84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 3 Calling for testimony in opposition to, or questions regarding this proposal, responding was: Lorraine Damman 2809 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Ms. Damman expressed concern over the fact the N.E. 23rd St. extension is right behind her home. She questioned if the property behind her was sold because it was her understanding an extension could not be completed until the sale was accomplished. Mr. Blaylock replied stating this is not an extension - it is only an emergency access to the site, not to be used as a through street. The emergency access roadway is only 20 ft. wide. She questioned a R-2 zone plateau Mr. Blaylock had made reference to earlier and discovered it was about 75 ft. below her residence. She asked Mr. Blaylock to explain the proposed traffic pattern to her as she was concerned about the suggested 600 vehicle trips per day. Mr. Blaylock stated the pattern would probably have traffic going down Jefferson Street to Harrington Street and out on to 16th; or could be routed down 21st Street and come out on either 23rd Street or 23rd Place. She had no further comments. Calling for further testimony, a response was received from: Mrs. Wayne Oyler 2123 Harrington Place N.E. Renton, Wa. 98056 Mrs. Oyler stated she lives between 21st Street and 23rd Street and questioned the opening of 21st Street for access, and the traffic that will come out Harrington Place to 23rd Place N.E.. She feels this is a terrible impact on her surroundings. There are seven residences on Harrington Place that would be impacted by this traffic. She questioned the fact that 21st Street was only going to be improved up to Harrington Place. What would happen to Harrington Place N.E. - would they have to participate in the improvements for others to use when the residents there now don't want the traffic anyway. The Hearing Examiner questioned why 23rd Street has been restricted to only an emergency access, and Mr. Blaylock stated it was because the City can not obtain the additional width for 23rd to make it a full street, and does not have the powers of condemnation for a dead-end street. It was noted that property that is needed for this project is owned by Mr. and Mrs. Oyler, but Mrs. Oyler, to date, has not filed a lot line adjustment that would give the City an additional 25 ft. right-of-way. She stated they had not done so as they wanted to see what the City was going to do with the property. The City does not have a full right-of-way on either 21st Street or 23rd Street. Mrs. Oyler had no further comments at this time. Calling for testimony in opposition to this proposal, wishing to speak from the audience was: Mitch Murray 2813 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Mr. Murray, passed out prepared information to the Examiner, Mr. Blaylock, the applicants' representatives and others in the audience. Referring to this information, he addressed such subjects as the zoning for this area as compared with the Comprehensive Plan for the area. He feels the zoning is excess and not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He also discussed the concerns of access stating he feels access by 21st or 23rd Street is not acceptable as those streets would require extensive paving and widening. He feels a portion referred to as Devil's Elbow would be a better access as it had been previously used for a the gravel pit and there is a gravel road already in place. The second access he proposed was Jefferson Avenue N.E. Mr. Murray relayed that the PUD ordinance states a project should be beneficial to the community. He does not feel this proposal qualifies. Questioning the greenbelt shown on the drawings, he discussed with the Zoning Administrator the greenbelt area, slopes, and how they apply to this proposal. Calling for further testimony, wishing to speak in opposition was: Kathleen Gormley 2820 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Ms. Gormley stated when they attended the first public hearing on this project they were told by the Mayor that the second access to this area would be through Devil's Elbow. She said she understood since that time it had been determined it would be too costly to HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA-. R-014-84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 4 develop that area and they have heard no more on the matter. She felt the Devil's Elbow access should definitely be considered because traffic through the residential areas involved would create more of an impact on their communities. She also stated she felt more people were interested and had input on this matter but could not attend a daytime meeting. She questioned why the meeting could not have been held at night. She was concerned that this would be the only public hearing held on the matter. The Hearing Examiner explained to Ms. Gormley that under normal rezone procedure this would be the only public hearing before the City Council. But under the State law when property is annexed into the City and the applicant simultaneously applies for a specific zoning request that is out of the ordinary, the City Council must hold two separate public hearings on the matter, along with the hearing on the annexation. He also advised that the City Council will hear the annexation request, as it is not a foregone conclusion that the property will be annexed into the city. He welcomed Ms. Gormley and her neighbors to attend the City Council hearings where they can express their concerns before the Council makes a final decision. Calling for further testimony, responding again was Greg Diener. Mr. Diener wanted to again address the Devil's Elbow access. He entered Exhibit #5 into the record which depicts the emergency access along 23rd Street and the Jefferson Street extension. He continued with reference to grade changes that would occur behind Ms. Damman's home stating they would be no more than 2 to 3 ft. The 21st Street access is intended to be the secondary access, the primary access for this site is intended to be through the Jefferson corridor. He said there is an existing 30 ft. right-of-way on 21st Street. It is the applicant's intention to improve 21st Street to a 24 ft. wide overlay section and not acquire additional right-of-way to bring to city standards. He stated it was not felt by the developer that the grades and slopes connecting Devil's Elbow with Jefferson Avenue are not practical, they are borderline possibilities due to existing topography. The grade on Devil's Elbow is approximately 20%. At this point, Mr. Blaylock stated the Devil's Elbow does not even meet emergency street standards. Wishing to speak further was Mr. Wayne Oyler, 2132 Harrington Place N.E., Renton, Washington, 98055. Mr. Oyler suggested the traffic should be routed down Jefferson, close off Devil's Elbow, eliminate the emergency access and have a U-turn at the end of Jefferson. From the audience, Mr. Mitch Murray approached the topography map and clarified the slopes and grades on Devil's Elbow. He questioned the applicant's statement of a 20% grade, and feels it is only a 10% grade. Mrs. Gormley questioned the need for 2 accesses, and when Mr. Blaylock stated the Fire Code requires 1 primary access and 1 secondary access, she said at the previous meeting they had been told there had to be 2 major accesses and an emergency access. Responding further on behalf of the applicant was: Mel Easter, Architect Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Easter discussed the guidelines used to calculate densities, as had been discussed with the previous Policy Development Director. With those numbers in mind, they have proceeded accordingly. He reviewed the rationale used in the placement of the R-2 zone and what they felt the advantages were for the filing of the rezone, PUD and annexation requests together. Mr. Easter added that they had been asked to provide a pedestrian connection from the north to the south portion of the project, and they intend to have a pedestrian connection from one side to the other so there will be pedestrian facilities in connection with surrounding neighborhoods within the project itself. Mr. Easter wanted to reiterate that Jefferson Avenue is the major access proposed and they will definitely be making it a more attractive corridor. The Hearing Examiner called for further testimony in support of, in opposition to, or comments regarding this proposal. There being no one else in the audience wishing to testify, the Examiner requested an additonal week to make his recommendation and decision due to the size and scope of the proposal. The applicant's representatives had no objection to the request for additional time. The hearing was closed at 11:15 A.M. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA-. R-014-84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 5 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.The applicant, Honey Creek Associates, has requested approval of a classification of approximately 47.7 acres of property, upon annexation, to R-1 (Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 7,200 sq ft), R-2 (Duplex Residential), and G-1 General; Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size 35,000 sq ft). The applicant has also requested simultaneous approval of Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPUD) of 185 dwelling units. 2.The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. 3.Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. The determination was predicated upon only the development of Phase I of the proposal, which would include only that portion of the site south and west of Honey Creek, and is limited to 99 units. 4.Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5.The subject site is located in the vicinity of 2200 Jefferson Avenue N.E. immediately south and generally east of 120th Place S.E. which is more commonly known as Devils Elbow. 6.The subject site in unincorporated King County is just north of the north central portion of the City. The applicant has applied for a concurrent annexation into the City, together with a rezone of the property for residential purposes. Generally, property annexed into the City is automatically classified G-1, a category which permits large lot single family uses. Specifically one dwelling per every 35,000 square feet. State enabling law permits a jurisdiction to conditionally zone property prior to its annexation. The zoning would then automatically become effective upon annexation. 7.In a similar fashion, State law permits the underlying land use approval to occur prior to annexation, again conditioned upon ultimate annexation. The applicant has requested conditional approval of a PPUD for up to 185 dwelling units on the subject site which would then become effective upon sucessful annexation. The ERC determination limiting the number of dwelling units and the location of development scales back only the PPUD. The requested rezone, for the purposes of this hearing, continues to cover the entire parcel. 8.The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of greenbelt, single family and low density multifamily uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. While not specific, a large portion in the central area of the site is designated for greenbelt. This is the steep slope area containing Honey Creek and its ravine and tributary ravines. An area along the southern property line would appear to be designated for the low density multifamily residential uses, as that is the area closest to an existing R-2 zone. The remaining outlying portions of the site would then be designated for single family uses. 9.The subject site contains complex topographical features. Two relatively level plateaus occur in the northeast and southwest quadrants of the subject site. Running more or less diagonally through the site from the northwest to the southeast is Honey Creek. The creek is situated in a steep, walled ravine with slopes ranging in excess of 56%. The subject site was an old quarry, and some of the slopes had been altered in the past. An old road grade was cut into the site from Devils Elbow to approximately the area of the proposed R-2 district. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA-. R-014-84 -•PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 6 10. The areas east and north of the subject site would remain in King County. Generally the areas north of the subject site are undeveloped while single family uses are located east of the site in a number of single family subdivisions. South of the subject site is a senior citizens housing development and duplex housing developed during World War II. Single family housing is located west of the subject site. 11. The zoning districts within Renton adjacent to the subject site are R-1 west of the subject site and R-2 south of the subject site. For the most part, the R-1 district includes most of the City west of the subject site, although other districts are embedded within this very large R-1 district. The R-2 district south of the subject site is a multi-block district with a P-1 (Public/Quasi-Public) district containing the Hillcrest elementary school grounds. A smaller R-1 district is located adjacent to the southeast corner of the subject site. 12. There is no sewer service to the subject site currently. A new sewer line will be constructed along the creek bed of Honey Creek. Construction should begin in this calendar year and completion is expected prior to occupancy of the subject site. 13. Storm drainage from the subject site will be into Honey Creek. Water lines will have to be extended to serve the subject site. 14. Due to the complex topography of the subject site, and given the existing development pattern in the general area, access routes to developable portions of the subject site are limited. The ERC required that access to the site be generally from the southwest. Under that requirement primary access would be via Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 21st Street, with secondary emergency access via N.E. 23rd Street. Most of the public opposition revolved around the proposed access and it s attendant impacts on the existing single family neighborhood and the inadequate road network. 15. The record indicates that both N.E. 21st and N.E. 23rd are substandard streets. While the record is unclear, the widths appear to be between 20 and 45 feet, with a lesser paved width along most sections. Access via N.E. 21st necessitates usage of Harrington Pl. N.E. and N.E. 23rd, both substandard streets, to gain access to northern arterial streets. Harrington is also less than 45 feet and narrowing to 25 feet at its northerly end - paved width less than 25 feet. Southerly travel from 21st could involve a circuitous route to Harrington P1. then to Harrington Circle and then to Harrington Avenue and either Index Ave or Harrington again. Then across N.E. 16th to Edmonds. City analysis of the access on 21st included right-of-way which is not public. The Oylers, adjacent property owners, have not completed an approved lot line adjustment which would have provided a dedication of this additional width. They oppose primary access to the subject site along 21st and would be expected to withhold access rights. 16. These substandard streets and circuitous routes are currently heavily utilized by residents northwest of the subject site to gain access to the Sunset Boulevard shopping areas. Likewise residents south and east of the subject site utilize this circuitous route in the reverse manner, to gain access to I-405. These routes as currently constructed and maintained, and as defined in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan are solely intended for local access. Neighborhood collectors per the Subdivision Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan are to be 60 feet - paved for 36 feet. The proposed opening of Jefferson Ave and its connection with 21st concerns residents along Harrington, 21st and 23rd Streets. This would open an even more direct route through a residential neighborhood. 17. The traffic analysis prepared for the subject proposal predicts 60% of the subject site's traffic from the western side of the ravine, Phase I of the PPUD, will travel south from the project site toward Kirkland Ave N.E. The remainder of the traffic from this area of the site would travel over other roads north and west of the site. No projected destinations were assigned to substantiate this analysis. 18. The proposed access roads have grades between 10 and 15%. A proposed access via Devils Elbow appears to have similar grades. A former road for quarrying purposes was in this alignment. 19. Preliminary discussions by the applicant with the Policy Development Department concluded that a density of approximately 185 units over the entire parcel was appropriate. These calculations were described by the applicant as initial density calculations. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA., R-014-84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 7 Section 4-2709(4)(B)(2) requires that: "Natural land slope shall be defined as the average slope of the lot in percent, determined by observation on simple slopes, or more precisely by the formula: S = 100 I L / A Where S is the percentage slope; I is the contour interval in feet; L is the combined length of the contour lines in scale feet; and A is the net area of the lot in square feet. (Emphasis supplied). 20. The Building and Zoning Department initially calculated that the dwelling unit count "is approximately one-half of what the developer and the Policy Development Director calculated in early 1984." (Memorandum from Roger Blaylock; January 9, 1985). Based upon this conclusion, the Building and Zoning Department requested, and was granted, a continuance of the original Public Hearing. 21. The different results apparently were based upon the interpretation of the above Section. Policy Development used averages of steep slope areas whereas Building and Zoning made its determination on the average slopes across the entire lot. The Building and Zoning Department indicated that they still favored the 'entire lot' versus 'individual slope' calculations but felt bound by the earlier analysis. A final analysis using Policy's formula still reduced the proposed 185 units to 179 units. Building and Zoning's projection would be approximately 90 units for the entire site. 22. The applicant proposes reclassifying approximately 6.0 acres to R-2; approximately 29 acres to R-1 and approximately 12.7 acres to G-1. (See attached map entered as Exhibit #2). The R-2 property would be located on the southwestern plateau approximately 75 feet below the surrounding grade, and approximately 190 feet north of the south property line and approximately 190 feet east of the west property line. Three separate areas are proposed for R-1 treatment. One of the R-1 districts proposed by the applicant would be approximately 'L' shaped and located in the intervening area between the R-2 zoning and adjacent properties. That district would be approximately 8.06 acres. The other proposed R-1 districts would be located on the east side of Honey Creek along the northern boundary of the site (approximately 16.14 acres) and along the eastern perimeter of the subject site (approximately 4.81 acres). The G-1 zone proposed by the applicant would include the stream bed of Honey Creek together with most of the steep side hills and ravines above Honey Creek, and tributary ravines. 23. No population projections or school age student projections were made for the subject proposal by staff. The project, Phase I's 99 units, would generate an estimated 782 vehicle trips per day. While Phase II is not being reviewed in this proceeding, its ultimate zoning is being considered. Phase II would be expected to generate a comparable daily trip level for the proposed 86 remaining units. CONCLUSIONS REZONE 1.The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. While the map and some policy elements of the Comprehensive Plan do not entirely justify the requested zoning, the topographic isolation of the subject site would appear to support the request. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA', R-014-84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 8 Proposed R-2 District 2.The area that has been requested for R-2 zoning does not appear to be located in the area strictly designated for low density multifamily dwelling units per the Comprehensive Plan. While the Comprehensive Plan designates the southern area of the subject site for duplex type housing stock the area proposed is approximately 200 feet north of the southern property line. The major rationale in the Comprehensive Plan would appear to be that the area so designated is a continuation of existing zoning patterns, that is, an R-2 zoning district is located immediately south of the subject site. As proposed, the rezone is some 200 feet north of the existing R-2 zone, and in fact, separated from it by proposed R-1 zoning. The request would carve out a new and independent R-2 zone in the midst of single family and extremely low density single family zoning. 3.While some non-compliance with the Comprehensive Plan may be evident on the south boundary, the proposal provides reasonable separation on the west from adjacent, separately owned, single family zoned and developed uses. The proposed R-1 zoning is a continuation of the existing zoning patterns and reasonably complements it. So while the proposed location of the R-2 zoning does not follow strictly orthodox land use practices when compared to the Comprehensive Plan map, the location is sufficiently isolated from adjoining properties by it's unique topography to cause little concern about adverse or undue effects of such a district on neighboring property. The plateau lies approximately 75 to 100 feet lower than the southerly properties, thereby creating a discrete environment and neighborhood. 4. While the proposed location would provide certain density bonuses to the applicant, the zoning does not appear to adversely affect neighboring properties and is compatible with those policies of the Comprehensive Plan which look for topographical barriers to provide buffers between distinct zoning categories. The bonus it may provide the applicant is obviously a trade-off to protect the stream environment while allowing the applicant reasonable development of private property. Proposed R-1 District 5.The three areas proposed for R-1 zoning appear generally compatible with similar single family designations made in the Comprehensive Plan. The largest area is in the northeast quadrant of the parcel and abuts either single family uses in King County or other undeveloped parcels to the north. It encompasses the larger of the two plateaus on the subject site. This district would be a logical extension of the single family uses located east of the site, although not an extension at this time of a Renton single family district. There are substantial steep slopes along the eastern edge of Honey Creek within the perimeter of this proposed R-1 area 6.The other two discrete R-1 areas are located along the eastern property line and the western and southern property line. The eastern area is similar to the above area. It is located adjacent to single family uses in neighboring King County, and would logically extend that type of land use. There is a relatively small, relatively gentle area within its proposed boundaries, but a substantial portion is steep sloped. 7.The last area proposed for R-1 zoning is the portion which wraps around the proposed R-2 district on the west and south. This area is more or less "L" shaped. It: follows the western and southern property lines of the site. As discussed above in the R-2 analysis, it continues the adjacent western R-1 district onto the subject site and acts to buffer the less intense single family uses to the west from the proposed R-2 zone. This area also marks that portion of the site which makes the transition from the Highlands relatively level topography to the steep topography adjacent to Honey Creek. These are the slopes above the proposed R-2 zone. 8. This R-1 zoning appears generally compatible with the designation in the Comprehensive Plan and again, it continues the existing single family zoning pattern west of the site to the site. Proposed G-1 District 9.The G-1 zoning proposed for the Honey Creek stream course and ravine system appears appropriate. Under current zoning practice in the city, G-1 provides the least intense residential density criterium of any zoning district. It would be compatible with the other proposed districts for the subject site, namely R-1 and R-2. As proposed, it would serve to protect those areas designated greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan, and in that regard, it is quite compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA', R-014-84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 9 PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 10. The emphasis supplied in Finding 18 (see above) regarding the Special Areas Steep Slope Formula clearly indicates that this office has difficulty with the interpretation of Section 4-2709(4)(B)(2) utilized in calculating the density for the proposed PPUD. The apparent decision of the Building and Zoning Department, which required the continuation of the Public Hearing, would lend weight to a reading of the Section as applicable to the entire lot and not individual portions of steep slope areas. In fact, the interim and preliminary determination to apply the steep slope formula to individual slopes would introduce uncertainly into the Ordinance. Some of the uncertainty would produce questions not unlike the following: "At what point is the slope steep enough, if not on "observation", to apply the formula? Has the slope leveled off enough to resort back to the general provisions?" The language clearly indicates that it is "the average slope of the lot." The formula includes as a variable the "net area of the lot." The Building and Zoning Department originally read it that way and this office must also read it that way. 11. Going further, unless the entire lot were the basis of the determination it would be impossible to reproduce the results now urged by the applicant. Any one using the map or visiting the site could begin the analysis and the calculations with any contour line. If the contour map, Exhibit #2, were presented to 5 different people, and they utilized the formula in the manner urged by the applicant, that is, they applied the formula to individual segments of steep slope, 5 different density figures would be the result. As an example, Using the area proposed for R-2 zoning: Would one use the 275 foot contour line, the 280 foot line, the 325 foot line or at the other extreme the 250 foot line? Basing the determination on the entire lot, all contour lines are used and all five persons, barring erroneous computation, should arrive at the same result. Unless the various parts of the slope formula are applied to the entire lot, depending upon each individual reviewer's perspective, the results could range from that initially calculated by Policy Development approximately 185 units) to those calculated by the Building and Zoning Department (approximately 90 units). And with the right (or wrong) choice of contour line, some density figure in the middle could result from a third analysis. Such a reading of the applicable provision cannot be justified when only uncertainly would result, and when the provision can easily, without any problems, be applied to an entire lot. 12. As the above analysis indicates, this office would be ignoring the obvious complications and total uncertainty engendered in the 'separate slope' preliminary calculations urged by the applicant. Whereas, applying the formula to the 'entire lot' should always result in the same certain result. This office would have difficulty ignoring the clear language of the Special Areas provision and cannot rely on what appears to be an incorrect interpretation. 13. This Hearing and its associated independent analysis is part of the continuous process of review. As such, this office is charged with assuring that applications meet the intent and letter of the City's regulations. The public has a right to expect that even if an error is detected at this stage in the proceedings that it will be corrected through the public hearing process. While it may be unfortunate, when an application is fairly complex and involves many components such as annexation, rezone and PPUD, its review gets stretched out over time. Over that long haul the interpretation attached to a 'preliminary' analysis becomes more settled between the applicant and some members of staff, although such settled opinion cannot be binding if incorrect. While momentum once developed in a certain direction is hard to modify, if the direction does appear incorrect it must be altered. Until the public hearing, anything done by staff and the applicant is just tentative. Any agreement must be judged after public input and according to applicable regulations. Therefore, initial, preliminary or tentative density calculation obviously must be subject to review even at this stage of the process. If those calculations are incorrect, they of necessity must be corrected. Therefore, the proposed 185 units, 99 of which were included in Phase I, the part of the PPUD subject to this review, must be recalculated. 14. Under this analysis the project must be modified considerably. But, after density criteria is corrected, if Council concurs, the development of the subject site as a PUD appears to serve the public use and interest. The unique topography and environment of the subject site can only be enhanced by clustering and designing around the steep slopes and Honey Creek. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA . R-014-84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 10 ACCESS 15. Access to the subject site remains a major concern. Even if the proposal is scaled back by approximately half, the streets surrounding the subject site are not collector roads, and in their current state should not be utilized as such. The major problem will be the connection of Jefferson to Kirkland as a through street. It will provide less circuitous access from the Sunset area to the west and I-405. While the small residential neighborhood now serves as such a link, its narrow, partially paved streets should not be made more attractive by a clear cross town route. Without substantial upgrading of roads which require width improvements, property acquisition and surface upgrading, the proposed access is inappropriate. It might still be inappropriate even with upgrading due to its effects on the residents along 21st, Harrington P1, and 23rd, since these streets were never intended to carry through traffic. 16. With the information presented this office is not convinced that the through connection of Jefferson/21st would serve the public use and interest. While it is obvious that the inclusion of the roadway appropriately named Devils Elbow into the City was purposely avoided to avoid maintenance responsibilities, access, at least secondary access to the subject site via this route might be appropriate. It was the access method proposed at the annexation hearings before the City Council and remained the applicant's original choice until the ERC review, and the ERC review did not have the benefit of public input. Conflicting figures submitted regarding potential road grade do not weigh more heavily for one method over the other. The grades appear comparable. The only obvious reasoning for the connecting link is possibly for the convenience of emergency vehicles, but that should not be the sole criteria. Convenience in the absence of necessity in the instance case is not persuasive. The proposed link will generate additional use of substandard roads, exacerbate the wear on already inadequate pavement and adversely affect a neighborhood. If Devils Elbow could serve for emergency purposes it should be considered. It still need not be annexed into the city to serve such a purpose. 17. If the connection between Jefferson and 21st is approved, the applicant should bear the cost of upgrading the roads and acquiring additional right-of-way to provide the additional width necessary, especially in light of the additional usage anticipated. Local residents should not bear the costs. As an analogy, similar development of a more intense complex in the midst of existing single family homes on substandard roads can be found in the CHG Sunpointe Complex. Anticipating the possible consequences, all road agreements should clearly define the full obligations involved. 18. This decision is not intended to affect the proposed annexation. This review and analysis was handled as though the property were already included within the City. No judgment is intended on the merits of annexation which will be considered by the City Council after separate review and deliberation. 19. In conclusion, if the City Council should approve the annexation of the subject site, the Council should consider zoning the subject site as proposed and represented on Exhibit #2. 20. The PPUD proposed by the applicant should be denied if the Council finds the calculations used to determine density were incorrect. A denial is predicated upon the substantial modification which will be required to reduce density to the standards required by the steep slope Special Areas formula. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should: 1. Approve the requested zoning for the subject site subject to the submission of a PUD for eventual development of the subject site, and subject to annexation of the site into the City. 2. Deny the PPUD based on an incorrect density analysis of the steep and complex slopes of the subject site. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA R-014--84 - PPUD-015-84 March 4, 1985 Page 11 ORDERED THIS 4th day of March, 1985. FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of March, 1985 to the parties of record: Greg Diener Mr. and Mrs. Wayne Oyler Johnson Braund Design Group 2123 Harrington Place N.E. 304 Main Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98055 Bob Tomberg Mitch Murray 5611 - 119th S.E. #2 2813 N.E. 23rd Place Bellevue, Wa. 98006 Renton, Wa. 98056 Mel Easter, Architect Kathleen Gormley Johnson Braund Design Group 2820 N.E. 23rd Place 304 Main Avenue South Renton, Wa. 98056 Renton, Wa. 98055 Lorraine Damman 2809 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Wa. 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 4th day of March, 1985 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 18, 1985. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. VICINITY MAP 1!Q nc Avl. 1 1 I I II` t Ili 11 11, 1 --- . 7- IIN \\I r a.r, yg —J.lnbr 1177 r<Istiny R-1 zon•w j L III ‘ \' r:Tu .. ro.i, Ykl(( 7 In ( Ai \ - - II At\ 4 1 r \_____I--- -- --- .. 1 " 1 pfi,,\ I. 1 I I 1 I\ FUTUREDEVE Q.P ItENTQF. R-1 zon• 8@ CONDOMINIUM UNIT$. W ) 7-, Th N-‘,:N<--- 73k \\ R‘ ‘ I'''‘ v' 4 7----------ThA\ Tr \ \ p,„„ii: Al\ikI \O "". ----- -------- - - 7- ) ) d lifiet„( 1N1 , i_-____________-_, I 1 )iirr1/4\lik is--r\ Sic. z, 4 ‘ q1,1\ _ I, l iT.CK •T , 0 IV PI t , , 7 ,-‘ \ Z r. i: '\ ilt , . .- ftriPoriti -- i1 \\I' it,q .., N_41.x.wsk\‘\ _ Al, \\\\ \\ t \ ,1).71H- F41"S ot ii iiel \\T ran _,,_ WO\, 0 1: Eq aT cato a r1Iii0 //(G-\--- Thii3101* *:'',;-,.; r__- t" 0\, \ i, i I 44 y f l= ` _ i. lam' e0l 01( 2il 'l( C ' appumoN .€ ma's\ \b, .. C AVE.n.a —( li Il.t uM IF!Lowe Mn M 0 L. J ° it-OKA 0 :-i' CO N Ln1L 11.L—' U 2 q A!\ f--- .:'-.. Pv --*: P \\ 4'''''------ 1- '\ k... :, r---i ( k, \ i i, 7,7, 142=":=7 MUM/ I It‘‘ \\ (//I ----- Lro . \_:‘„; ,\,,,..,1_, NN((( li ( A! D7/ if: tt -, Nk\t\\*1 \t,„...,,,...4_.._,_ " iii ,, 1 \\%\ % i le I 1 4\\ W\3; 7-... " s‘ . , \ NV ) 7-) -a=Th T \-\ : Th\'tk\\\ 10iot ; y// 2- HH j' -') ?[. \\1\% I\11l i 7 d VICINITY MAP A 1: 7zIL g r- - r-- A-)N') I ' c -\ 7 1 il k\6 71-1 --f-\ s, •\ r h 8 ii,:----- fl\\\ l 4------`, 1\\\\ INi1\\\K., __ No. \ ,- -( ,— f-1 m.., \ _. ,,i 1 0,,! 1 \ t' l\ ' . 11,-- 1 / \\''''4 ISWKV----- , h B 1 1)k k -. Z,2-- 5/-/ s )'‘ f\ klk z.--------'%'— V 1,j\\il ,A- N 1__ _ ,-- lirc /J. '\\N \ c ,\C,;_ ) l_ml 0 S:._7r= 1--_- -- 1-_,__•- --MH 1'' \: \ '\ A \ _-- .- I ( 4( 'k'kV. .:----<-1 (((.1 .....„ g 1 vg1 existing Et \/tCi ))7iilE=3,0 ak, !. PAcIF lc cur..,' r) 52:.-- . — : 1- I ' II - -''....t .-'T- Cr .--...--1 1 i I 0 f40 I 1 G-1 01 II 1 f i I 404 4oe J tW 1, I I1r zto 20, REN TON c17 I_INI.T PI t y -- P-1 1 s I i1 I1- 111 1 I l r. ' ra WI -,„ ' 1 SIERRA HEIGHTS zoo l... ., -,,_;,, ,,, ,,,,,IWzt_1ti.' 1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 14..Mina in '`,6. ---- ÷._,--1.-.',____L__,som. s o H•••.„-F. 1.1;-.M' , ..I,..i,.,.,. 1.7.7.,i:1,,7 •• '• N ,4 ' I,1.1. , .J I , i 7 ,r..r I•l. l.'1'' " , • Q firms 1T: M • O ' Io,4 • • = p—r.il 1• .i.Inglilliboimaip1 - , y=. i i ,sue. •1 I r J A F 's lir . X--." Iss ri gr1H-Fei'' , A ..11 ,,,,,„_ ..: .5 ,,,......,al-. HI.I, c for a, Z Ia , -, ‘ t'r 1 I, ? EIFMENTARY R!! I (1 1 l••ir.r—. _ eA• .1 1 5n1001 J are I I 1\.1 1 T .E. .=—T-- i- ,'' t=1'''° . ." : • EI L I NOR,N ,'a, t,' ' y;. 1 j 1 • ';L.. A 1116111 ANDS • tr 42 I u-/. PAR''' Z. 4 209 •• ' . y' --- I . lk•5', • }1 t11I 44.L•'• +- l=ref I V it yy, L,1 1JE 4. t., t 1 7-'''B 1 R 3 ne . 4.,,,, .i' 1. 1!n. t•- ng... , 7' ...' i.. E'•, i-1t.•1_ L CC SC. WOo} 1 ' ' I • t ... ' I,f; • 1 II 1 p I g Ir 4 1 1 Li 41 \\— JV i4 1, j i .. . • 1. z e as ,T.i. 1 3 - R-1 et•J u + ^. k4I-1`5-1 ; ( . •] r-t • .1 t,-HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES R- 014-84 PPUD- 015-84 APPL I CANT HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA - 47.7 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS JEFFERSON AVE N.E.EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE REZONE TO G-1, R-1 and R-2 and P.U.D. FOR 185 UNITS (99 UNITS --COMPREHENS I VE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY, LOWDENSITY MULTI-FAMILYPHASE I)AND GREENBELT COMMENTS 83-47 PTS. JB34 SANTA-TOMBERG 2-11-85 BICKEL & ASSOC. SURVEY INVERSE AND AREA Pt#1 to Pt#37 NORTH 88 19 25 WEST 1 , 288. 900 Feet - FROM Pt# 37 TO ' Pt# 38 NORTH 00 51 31 EAST 1 , 169. 800 Feet - FROM Pt# 38 TO Pt# 39 SOUTH 88 17 00 EAST 185. 430 Feet - FROM Pt# 39 TO Pt# 40 NORTH 01 16 00 EAST 738. 800 Feet- FROM Pt# 40 TO Pt# 41 SOUTH 88 15 36 EAST 555. 640 Feet ^~ FROM Pt# 41 TO Pt# 42 SOUTH 01 16 00 WEST 392. 580 Feet ~ FROM Pt# 42 TO Pt# 43 SOUTH 88 17 00 EAST 555. 640 Feet - FROM Pt# 43 TO Pt# 44 SOUTH 01 16 00 WEST 346. 000 Feet - INVERSE TO POINT# 201 SOUTH 01 16 00 WEST 1 , 168. 750 Feet - INVERSE TO POINT# 1 SOUTH 83 42 02 EAST 532 Feet Total area of tract is; 2, 113, 935. 184 SO FT or 48. 529274 Acres PRECISION = 0. 532/6401 . 54 = 8. 31050028587E-5 83-47 PTS. JB34 SANTA-TOMBERG 2-25-85 PARCEL A INVERSE AND AREA FROM Pt# 372 TO Pt# 373 SOUTH 57 16 00 WEST 317. 773 Feet FROM Pt# 373 TO Pt# 374 SOUTH 80 16 00 WEST 321 . 704 Feet FROM Pt# 374 TO Pt# 375 NORTH 31 44 00 WEST 323. 149 Feet FROM Pt# 375 TO Pt# 376 NORTH 23 44 00 WEST 710. 730 Feet FROM Pt# 376 1 O Pt# 377 NORTH 01 16 00 EAST 200. 000 Feet FROM Pt# 377 TO Pt# 378 SOUTH 88 15 36 EAST 500. 000 Feet FROM Pt# 378 TO Pt# 379 SOUTH 01 16 00 WEST 392. 580 Feet FROM Pt# 379 TO Pt# 380 SOUTH 88 17 00 EAST 555. 640 Feet FROM Pt# 380 TO Pt# 381 SOUTH 01 16 00 WEST 475. 000 Feet Total area of tract is; 703, 234. 655 SO FT or 16. 144046 Acres 83-47 PTS. JB34 SANTA-TOMBERG 2-25-85 PARCEL B INVERSE AND AREA FROM Pt# 392 TO Pt# 393 NORTH 88 44 00 WEST 278. 412 Feet FROM Pt# 393 TO Pt# 394 NORTH 08 44 00 WEST 510. 445 Feet FROM Pt# 394 TO Pt# 395 NORTH 56 16 00 EAST 448. 085 Feet FROM Pt# 395 TO Pt# 396 SOUTH 01 16 00 WEST 759. 701 Feet Total area of Oact is; 209, 401 . 727 SO FT or 4. 807202 Acres i i i l 83-47 PTS. JB34 SANTA-TOMBERG 2-25-85 PARCEL C INVERSE AND AREA FROM Pt# 351 TO Pt# 352 NORTH 11 08 29 WEST 181 . 546 Feet FROM Pt# 352 TO Pt# 353 NORTH 81 08 29 WEST 498. 634 Feet FROM Pt# 353 TO Pt# 354 NORTH 45 08 29 WEST 160. 000 Feet FROM Pt# 354 TO Pt# 355 NORTH 03 23 29 WEST 486. 000 Feet FROM Pt# 355 TO Pt# 356 SOUTH 89 08 29 EAST 106. 000 Feet FROM Pt# 356 TO Pt# 357 NORTH 09 08 29 WEST 104. 289 Feet FROM Pt# 357 TO Pt# 358 NORTH 45 38 29 WEST 343. 363 Feet FROM Pt# 358 TO Pt# 359 SOUTH 00 51 31 WEST 1 , 169.800 Feet FROM Pt# 359 TO Pt# 360 SOUTH 88 19 25 EAST 843. 900 Feet Total area of tract is; 351 , 317. 326 SO FT or 8. 065136 Acres 83-47 F'TS. JB34 SANTA-TOMBERG 2-2 5-85 PARCEL D INVERSE AND AREA FROM F't# 302 TO F't# 303 NORTH 81 08 29 WEST 400. 4.38 Feet FROM Pt# 303 TO F't# 304 NORTH 45 08 29 WEST 160. 000 Feet FROM Pt# 304 TO Pt# 305 NORTH 03 23 29 WEST 486. 000 Feet FROM F't# 305 TO Pt# 306 SOUTH 89 08 29 EAST 275. 830 Feet FROM Pt# 306 1-0 F't# 307 SOUTH 32 08 29 EAST 499. 086 Feet FROM Pt# 307 TO Pt# 308 SOUTH 00 51 31 WEST 232. 970 Feet Total area of tract is; 261, 330.099 SO FT or 5. 999314 Acres 87-47 FTS. JFC4 SANTA-TOMBERG 2-^5-85 PARCELS E AND F COMBINED INVERSE AND AREA FROM F't# 40• TO Pt# 404 NORTH 01 16 00 EAST 124. 700 Feet FROM Pt# 404 TO F't# 405 NORTH 88 44 00 WEST 278.412 Feet FROM Pt# 405 TO Pt# 406 NORTH 08 44 00 WEST 510.445 Feet FROM Pt# 406 TO F't# 407 NORTH 56 16 00 EAST 448. 085 Feet FROM Pt# 407 'O F't# 408 NORTH 01 16 00 EAST 155.749 Feet FROM F't# 408 TO F't# 409 SOUTH 57 16 00 WEST 717.773 Feet FROM Pt# 409 TO Pt# 41n SOUTH 80 16 00 WEST 721 . 704 Feet FROM Pt# 410 TO F't# 411 NORTH ?i. 44 00 WEST 27. 149 Feet FROM Pt# 41. 1 TO Pt# 412 NORTH 2: 44 00 WEST 710. 730 Feet FROM F't# 412 TO F't# 41: NORTH 01 16 00 EAST 200.000 Feet FROM F't# 413 TO Pt# 414 NORTH 88 15 36 WEST 55. 640 Feet FROM Pt# 414 TO F't# 415 SOUTH 01 16 00 WEST 778.800 Feet FROM Pt# 415 TO F't# 416 NORTH 88 17 00 WEST 185.430 Feet FROM Pt# 416 TO Pt# 417 SOUTH 45 78 29 EAST 47. 767 Feet FROM Pt# 417 TO F't# 418 SOUTH 09 08 29 EAST 104. 289 Feet FROM F't# 418 TO F't# 419 SOUTH 89 08 29 EAST 169.870 Feet FROM F'ti* 419 TO Pt# 420 SOUTH =2 08 29 EAST 499.086 Feet FROM F't# 420 TO Pt# 421 SOUTH 00 51 71 WEST 2:2. 970 Feet FROM F't# 421 TO F't# 4'22 SOUTH 81 08 29 EAST 98. 196 Feet FROM F't# 422 TO F't# 423 SOUTH 11 08 29 EAST 181 . 546 Feet FROM F't# 427 TO F't# 424 SOUTH 88 1.9 25 EAST 445. 000 Feet Total area of tract is; 588, 651 . 762 SO FT or 1 51:576 Acres 1610 SUFFICIENCY OF THE PETITION On _ qi764l 198_S , the undersigned comme iced a determination of the sufficiency of the 75% petition for annexation in the 4n4 Crrek ASoc.ea4 ,.annexation, which petition requested the annexation of the real property described in Attachment A attached hereto, and wh ch had been filed with the City of Renton on 44' 198 •'j. Dated:3/eg 0921 G PP— d[1v1 JUHNSON r9NC. ft,r7 -- OF[ G1F . 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 200 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 DATE Ian, 1j / JOB NO. ^ _ -+ 47 RENTON 271-7200 SEATTLE 623-5732 ATTENTION ' t5/Afl 1CX: TO I I // I 4 -/ RE: _ , ail t// Tom . ,/ 4/2 El[/ devv - 1 77fll api: 1 WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples 0Specifications Copy of letter Change order s't e' /G /- f ,/,( ilI /D%`' - COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION 2- "x /# " 4 Ili A re- (itC1-7bw- THESE ARE TR/NSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval N' For your use Approved as noted Submit_ copies for distribution X As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment FCR BIDS DUE_ 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS CITY OF RENTON I 2Li nUrti JAN 91985 RimnlNG/ZO G DEPT. COPY TO E.- SIGNED: i Ty! PRODUCT NO-3 (na/Ice. ,Ilia 01471 It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. t JO OF R4, 4A a•z 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR CS- 9 "MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 091 D SI_PS P BARBARA Y, SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 9, 1985 TO: FRED J . KAUFMAN, LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FROM), vec ROGER J. BLAYLOCK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR RE. 3ONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT R-014-84 AND PPUD-015-84 The Building and Zoning Department can not comply with Section 4-3012 of Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance and provide a staff report to the Hearing Examiner the required seven (7) days before the scheduled public hearing. At the time of preparation of the final report, it was discovered that three major errors existed. First, the applications include property that was not included in the annexation. Both the rezone and P.U.D. applications were not reduced in area after the annexation was revised. Secondly, the plans do not reflect the ERC' s decision to require dedication of Jefferson Ave. N.E. along the western property line. Lastly and probably the most serious problem is that the dwelling unit count that the Building and Zoning Department has just calculated under the P.U.D. process is approximately one-half of what the developer and the Policy Development Director calculated in early 1984. We can not find the documentation that supported the final decision to have the applicant apply for a P.U.D. with 185 dwelling units. Since the application should be substantially revised, we request that the public hearing be continued until February 19th or 26th. This would allow review time and legal notice time by reposting the property and new advertisements in the Record Chronicle. w February 26, 1985 Mitch Murray 2813 NE 23rd Place Renton, Washington 98056 Phone: (206) 228-2288 206) 237-8056 206) 237-4774 City of Renton Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman 20C Mill Avenue South Rerton, Washington 98055 Mr. Kaufman, This letter is regarding the the Honey Creek area rezone and PUD which was the subject of the public hearing on February 19, 1985 at 9:00 am. I would like to make comments and recommendations on some issues: RE C E I V E D This information was received 2/28/85, after hearing of 2/19/85 , and will not r E B 2 3 198S receive consideration in the Findings and Decision to be presented by the Hearing CITY OF R E N TON Examiner within 21 days of the hearing date. HEARING EXAMINER 64, / Issue 1 . Regarding the best route for emergency access to the property: A) Attachment B is a photocopy of part of the NE 23rd Street emergency access plans (these plans were submitted to the Hearing Examiner by Honey Creek Associates , just before the end of the February 19, 1985 hearing) . Section A-A correctly shows that the right-of-way is 20ft, this agrees with the King County Assessor map, which is attached (attachment A) . Section A-A of .attachment B shows that the actual pavement width is only 15ft due to the 4ft wide, loft high, rockery on the south side and the lft wide planting strip on the north side. The corresponding planting strip on the currently finished north side of NE 23rd Street between Harrington Place NE and Edmonds Ave NE is 6ft wide. Also, City code section 9-1108 7. H. table 1 , and 9-1108 23. A. 11 ) D. , both indicate that the minimum width of planting strips is 4ft. Therefore I feel that the lft planting strip is too small and should actually be at least 4ft. Also, attached (attachment E) is a photocopy of another part of the NE 23rd Street emergency access plans, which shows section B-B indicating that the access road would require a 6ft high rockery on each side of the NE 23rd Street access over portions of the road. These two rockeries would each require at least 4ft of width. Using 4ft for the width of the planting strip and/or rockery on each side results in the proposed NE 23rd Street access road having a paved width of only 12 ft. B) I measured the pavement width of SE 97th Street and 120th Place SE Devil ' s Elbow road) on February 20, 1985 and found it to be in general 18ft wide. Some regions are 20ft wide and there are three locations where it is only 16-17ft wide over short distances. In my opinion the entire road could be brought up to 18ft easily. There is room on the shoulders in the narrow regions to allow widening to 18ft. I also believe that the entire roadway could be widened to 20ft by simply grading and paving an additional 2ft on the uphill edge of the road. This would require the installation of approximately a 4ft high bulkhead along some of the sections. There is no problem with right-of-way as shown on the attached (attachment A) King County assessor map for this road which shows that there is a 60ft right-of-way. page 2 C) Attachment C is a photo copy of page 40 of the Uniform Fire Code. It states that the "driving surface" shall be a minimum of 20ft wide for access roadways. D) In conclusion, the Devil ' s Elbow road and the proposed NE 23rd Street access are both below fire code standards. However the Devil 's Elbow road is nearer to the standard than the proposed NE 23rd Street access . Also, Devil 's Elbow road has sufficient right-of-way to be brought up to standards and the proposed NE 23rd Street access does not have sufficient right-of-way. Issue 2. Regarding slopes of, and suitability of, the proposed roads interior to the property: A) Attached (attachment D) is a photo copy of the property plans which I have marked with the calculated slopes of the interior roads based on the conLour lines and appropriate lengths. The road (road A on attachment D) along the west edge of the property has a slope of 13.1% from the point of the NE 23rd Street access intersection on down to the main plateau (I used section B-B of attachment E for obtaining the value of the elevation at the NE 23rd Street access point) . The road bed (road B on attachment D) from Devil 's Elbow to the main plateau has a slope of 13.7%. The roadway (road C on attachment D) from the upper area to the plateau via the south east route has a slope of 14.2%. In conclusion all these possible interior roads have slopes over 10% and less that 15%. Therefore they all meet minimum standards for street grades for non-major streets according to city code section 9-1108 7. F. The proposed roadway marked A and D on attachment D should not be allowed. Roadway A and D on attachment D would be damaging to the residential environment bordering the western property line. Roadway A and D on attachment D would not be required if access to the lower plateau were provided byroad C and emergency access wereprovided byroad B.9 Y pdge 3 IssJe 3. Regarding zoning and the question of how many units should be allowed under PUD rules: A) The Comprehensive plan document states on page 30 that, "As a general rule, areas with slopes that average 25% or more should be designated as greenbelts . Development should be prohibited on slopes greater than 40%. In greenbelt areas with less than 40% slope, scattered single family development at densities of one unit per acre or less) may be allowed - although clustering should be encouraged. In some cases higher residential densities may be allowed - if utilities and access are available - provided that at least 75% of the site remains in open space, that slopes are undisturbed and that development is clustered. " B) Attachment F shows what the greenbelt areas look like for the property using the above Comprehensive Plan slope guide. The areas shown in dark green are areas with more that 40% slope, the areas in light green have slopes between 25% and 40%. The areas left in white have slopes less that 25%. The total area of all the dark and light green areas where the slope is greater than 25% is 29.6 acres. C) Attachment G shows the recommended land use guidelines from the the Land Use Element map from the Comprehensive Plan document. Attachment G has a greenbelt area of 29.4 acres. D) Renton Building Regulations section 4-706 (A) states, "Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-1 ) is established for low density single family residential dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of inccmpatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. This zoning classification may be permitted in an area designated as single family residential in the comprehensive plan. " E) It does not say, nor imply, that R-1 zoning may be applied to an area designated as greenbelt in the Comprehensive Plan. page 4 F) Section 4-708 (A) states, "Purpose: The Residential Zone (R-2) is established to provide and protect suitable environments for low to medium density multi-family residential dwellings. It is further intended to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to the residential environment. This zoning classification may be permitted in an area designated as low density multi-family residential in the Comprehensive Plan. " G) It does not say, nor imply, that R-2 zoning may be applied to an area designated as greenbelt in the Comprehensive Plan. H) Section 4-704 (C) 1 . states that, "Dwelling Unit Density and Lot Area: The dwelling unit density in the G-1 Zone shall not exceed one dwelling unit per acre (including area dedicated for public purposes) . The lot area shall not be less than thirty five thousand (35,000) square feet. " The allowable unit densities of all the zones other than G-1 are greater than one unit per acre. Thus it appears that G-1 is the appropriate zoning for the light green areas of the green belt regions shown on attachment F. These are the areas where slopes are between 25% and 40%. The Comprehensive Plan recommends densities of not more than one unit per acre for areas with slopes between 25% and 40%, as quoted above in paragraph 3. (A) . I) !here is no zoning classification which exactly fits the dark green regions where the Comprehensive Plan recommends that development be prohibited but the closest is the G-1 zone. J) therefore, in order to be consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Use Element map, there is a total of approximately 29 acres that should be zoned G-1 , leaving approximately 19 acres that are potential candidates for zoning of R--1 or R-2. I II iI pays 5 K) The only area that should be considered for zoning R-2 lies in the soulhuest corner of the property according to the Land Use Element map in the Comprehensive plan (as shown on attachment G) . It is reasonable that this area is a potential area for zoning of R-2 since it borders an R-2 zone in the city to the south and there is a greenbelt buffer between it and the other areas. Therefore I have assigned this area, labeled "A" on attachment H, a zone of R-2. Overlaying attachment H and attachment G over attachment F shows that. I have made area "A" as large as possible without grossly violating the Comprehensive Plan guidelines. I have assigned a zoning of R-1 to all the other areas where there is sufficient non-greenbelt area for development as indicated on attachment H. Overlaying attachment H over attachment F shows that I have made areas B, C and D as large as possible without grossly violating the greenbelt areas. L) Attachment H shows the resulting land areas in acres for each of the zon(3s. Also shown on attachment H are the street right-of-way areas which are needed for PUD calculations. M) Shown on attachment I is the total allowed number of units assuming the area is to be developed as a PUD (I used the PUD ordinance rules from Renton code sections 4-2709 3. and 4-2709 4. B. ) . Note that the resulting number of units of 93 is significantly smaller than the 179 mentioned in the PPUD-015-84. N) Another way of looking at the problem of deciding how many units should be allowed in the PUD is to use common sense as follows: Since the intent of the PUD ordinance is not to increase unit densities above what would occur based on underlying zoning (Renton Building Regulations section 4-2702 L. ) - A II common sense way to find the maximum number of units that should be allowed is to dra.: up a dummy plat map of the area based on underlying zoning and count the resulting number of units. I have done just this on attachment J. I come up with a maximum allowable number of units of 74. Again this number is significantly lower than the 179 units from PPUD-015-84. p yp F) 0) In conclusion, the maximum number of units that should be allowed with the PUD is at most 93, not 179. The 179 unit figure is artificially inflated because substantial areas with slopes in excess of 40% have been included in the R-1 zones and an R-2 zone has been improperly placed in a single family residential region. These practices are in contradiction with the Comprehensive Plan document and are also not justified by any Renton Ordinance and also go against common sense. Issue I . Regarding the condition and suitability of residential roads NE 21st Street, NE 23rd Street, NE 23rd Place and Harrington Place NE. A) Attachment A shows only a 30ft right-of-way for parts of NE 21st Street. Renton code section 9-1108 7. H. table 1 shows a minimum right-of-way width of 60ft for "neighborhood collectors". A neighborhood collector is what NE 21st Street would become if it were connected to Jefferson. Thus using NE 21st Street would be contrary to Renton code unless additional right-of-way were obtained and the street were paved to city standards. B; Attachment A shows that Harrington Place NE between NE 21st Street and NE 23rd Street has a right-of-way of 45ft over most of it's length and a right-of-way of only 25ft at the end of Harrington Place NE where it meets NE 23rd Street. Therefore using Harrington Place NE would be contrary to Renton Ordinance unless additional right-of--way were obtained and the street were paged to city standards for a neighborhood collector. C: Attachment A shows a right-of-way of only 40ft for most of NE 23rd Street between Harrington Place NE and Edmonds Ave NE. Again, additional right-of-way would need to be obtained and paving would be required in order to bring the street up to city standards. page 7 . D) A potential route for traffic to go, from Harrington Place NE, other than NE 23rd Street would be for it to use NE 23rd Place. However, NE 23rd Place is too narrow. It was finished to city minimum standards for residential access streets less than 800ft long (50ft right-of-way, 32ft pavement width, see Renton ordinance section 9-1108 7. H. table 1 ) . It was not intended as a neighborhood collector which requires a minimum right-of-way of 60ft and a minimum pavement width of 36ft. Therefore using NE 23rd Place would be contrary to City ordinance unless additional right-of-way were obtained and additional paving were done. Issue 5. Regarding the idea of building the extension of Jefferson Ave NE from NE 21st Street to NE 23rd Street, to city standards for a public street, and eventually widening the proposed NE 23rd Street emergency access road to city standards for a residential street. A) This would have a significant effect on the traffic pattern in the area. The new traffic pattern is illustrated on attachment K. Many of the apartments and homes in the Renton Highlands No. 2 area (between NE 12th Street and NE 21st Street, and between Jefferson Ave NE and the Honey Creek valley just east of Kirkland Ave NE) would now use Jefferson Ave NE and NE 23rd Street to get to and from I-405 when heading toward or coming from the north. This would significantly detract from the residential environment alcng NE 23rd Street and NE 23rd Place. Also it would require that Jefferson AVE NE between NE 21st Street and NE 23rd Street be finished to "neighborhood collector" standards (60ft right-of-way and 36ft pavement width, Renton code Section 9-1108 7 . H. table 1 ) . Also additional right-of-way would need to be obtained along NE 23rd Street between Jefferson Ave NE and Edmonds Ave NE and a 5,;ignificant amount of repaving would be needed along this street. page 8 411 Summary of conclusions and recommendations: Issue 1 . The plan to use NE 23rd Street for emergency access should be rejected. Devil ' s Elbow road should be widened to 20ft pavement width and it should be used for emergency access instead. Issue 2. The plan to extend Jefferson Ave NE north to NE 23rd Street and continue it as a private road on down to the lower plateau area should be rejected. Using only the road in southeast area (road C on attachment D) for connecting the upper and lower levels is the more direct route. Using only the southeast route would be less damaging to the residential environment along the west property line. Issue 3. The maximum allowable number of units should be reduced from 179 to at most 93. The maximum number of units west of Honey Creek should be at mos-,: 45. The 179 number is inflated due to improperly attempting to zone large areas of land, with more than 40% slope, R--1 ; and improperly placing an R-2 zone where the Comprehensive Plan recommends a Single Family residential area. Issue 4. The plan to use NE 21st Street and or NE 23rd Street for access to the area should be rejected. The neighborhood roads in the area are not currently finished to city standards and there is currently not sufficient right-of-way to finish them. Also using these roads would be damaging to the residential environment in these areas. Issue 5. Plans to connect NE 21st Street to NE 23rd Street with Jefferson Ave NE, and to eventually widen the NE 23rd Street emergency access to full street width, should be rejected. Connecting these would result in a tremendous increase in traffic on NE 23rd Street. NE 23rd Street is not currently firished to city standards and there is currently insufficient right-of-way to do so. Also this traffic increase would be damaging to the residential environment in these areas. page 9 If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, i7, //iC/j2C Mitch Murray page 10 Al‘ alks AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 4th day of March 1985, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this y day of -)-no,\4 1985. 2P-6-t-/0 ( 4LQ‘a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington, residing at p Y, therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: R-014-84 & PPUD-015-85 - HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) Ac1-t t_._. PA ) V T z.o 10' RO.W. 380 15' W IDE PROP05ED Et1ERG. ACCESS KOND rs 370 ROCKERY XlTINCI GRADE 111 360 f Ncr'E : Pi-RNTIt I P 5 514 o w N -T-a 1S& Foal W14E SECTION A-A SCALE HORIZONTAL 1 "=24' VERTICAL rz 10' THIS 1 5 R PI+o-fo co PY of PPrs2--r o F PLRNS Fo,Z N E Z%R D S'r MER PtcC SS• T fZ o21G NRL uvAS S+sM Trt-D T AllAorite C// 1 /) I+EftIZ1NF cifrivi)N R Ar Titer o P T H-E 11 F E S $ b' It'R,NG le-.' 3 P.' • a •'"'?'' a.`> a( i r. ,• d' • a` i^ S c . V'' sP xfifr r: a yz+ C rj a aa, a 4, 44101111 4. k e'l pE/ fJr ti 41 y/// C Z W n 1. l_ 4 v 0 a 0 n Ir d Z 0 0 C.—, M CI 1-. 3 e' er.. 11. 0 IIIIMIN 0 ""'• % i 1 VI§ 1 Ci Lj_ i Z Co) f...,-. ( NI 111Z 4,--- 1, 0) 1,.: 1 II gle, 1 1 1 t 1. 1 371: 1 i I II 1. 1i 811171i. ljaiii: 11:1( 3,..; 0( II ivfl ,•'' C..: I 0. p.::`, 1,...,.... k L. t1 • 1% 1‘",. it:" ; . 1. : i ii 1 ( j t T. I i ' iij • 1 i 7- 71 7(- 7 9 - r .*•??// 1 t4t, %** Ia . I A Tr. C 1( 3 11 7 Prey It is the intent of the International Western Fire Chiefs Association to co Code and the Uniform Building Code Neither code is intended to stand al Uniform Fire Code,the Uniform Build the Uniform Plumbing Code and the Na j counties a complete and comprehensn patible with each other. The Uniform Fire Code was initiall) Association and was first published in Building Officials and the Western FL was published in 1973 and subsequent intervals. New editions incorporate cha Western Fire Chiefs Association. Anyone may propose amendmentstoFirstPrintingtheInternationalConferenceofBuilding page. Code changes to the code are supplement form,permitting ready ado] Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 81-86619 carefully reviewed in public hearings b; and life safety. COPYRIGHT 1982 MMMn,MMMMMM,wIMM,MMMMIMM„M,MMM„M,Mm by INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS indicates a change in the requirement f] due to reformatting are not identified. 5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD n xr>9.:;:M:„;:frr:>>: indicates the provision is an excerptofWHITTIER,CALIFORNIA 90601 Code. Changes to such provisions are p and ference of Building Officials. WESTERN FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION Deletion indicators(M)are provided it 5360 SOUTH WORKMAN MILL ROAD a listing has been deleted. WHITTIER,CALIFORNIA 90601 PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. e..ArT.r....__ 210.206-10.208 UNIFORM FIRE CODE 1982 EDITION Obstruction of Fire Protection Equipment Key Box Sec. 10.206.No person shall place or keep any post,fence,vehicle,growth, Sec.10.209.When access to or within a structi trash, storage or other material or thing near any fire hydrant, fire department because of secured openings or where immedia connection or fire protection system control valve that would prevent such saving or fire-fighting purposes,the chief may re< equipment or hydrant from being immediately discernible or in any other manner an accessible location.The key box shall be a type deter or hinder the fire department from gaining immediate access to said contain keys to gain necessary access as required equipment or hydrant.A minimum 3-foot clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of the fire hydrants except as otherwise required or approved by DivisionIIIthechief. IAccess Roadways for Fire Apparatus INSTALLATION AND MAINTE 1 Sec. 10.207. (a) Required Construction. Every building hereafter con- PROTECTION, LIFE-SAFETII structed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of access road- APPLIANCE: ways with all-weather driving surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed I width,with adequate roadway turning radius capable of supporting the imposed Installation loads of fire apparatus and having a minimum of 13 feet 6 inches of vertical Sec 10.301.(a)Type Required.The chief shal I clearance.Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 feet long shall of fire appliances to be installed and maintain( I be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire department premises in the jurisdiction other thanprivateapparatus. according to the relative severity of probable f EXCEPTION:When there are not more than two Group R,Division 3 or M which it may spread.Such appliances shall be of Occupancies as defined in the Building Code,the requirement of this section may be j class of fire associated with such building or prei modified when,in the opinion of the chief,fire-fighting or rescue operations would the chief. not be impaired. Portable fire extinguishers shall be in accord, b) Obstructing. The required width of access roadways shall not be 10-1. obstructed in any manner,including parking of vehicles.NO PARKING signs or b) Special Hazards. In occupancies of an other appropriate notice,or both,prohibiting obstructions may be required and where special hazards exist in addition to the nor shall be maintained. where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficu c) Extent. The access roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all required consisting of additional fire appliance portions of the exterior walls of the first story of any building. Where the access appliance,or special systems suitable for the pr roadway cannot be provided,approved fire protection system or systems shall be Such devices or appliances may consist of autom provided as required and approved by the chief. is sprinkler or water spray systems, standpipe d)Fire-protection Alternate.Where fire-protection systems approved by the extinguishers, suitable asbestos blankets, breast chief are provided,the above required clearance may be modified. matic covers, carbon dioxide, foam, halogens special fire-extinguishing systems. Wheresuche)Oversizing.The chief shall have the authority to require an increase in the be in accordance with the applicable UniformFirminimumaccesswidthswheresuchwidthisnotadequateforfireorrescue operations. the National Fire Protection Association when I not apply.f)Bridges.Where a bridge is required to be used as access under this section, c)Water Supply. An approved watersupplitshallbeconstructedandmaintainedinaccordancewiththeapplicablesectionsfireflowforfireprotectionshallbeprovidedtoaloftheBuildingCodeandusingdesignliveloadingsufficienttocarrytheimposed or portions of buildings are hereafterconstruloadsofthefireapparatus. Premises Identification building protected is in excess of 150 feet from there shall be provided, when required bytheSec. 10.208. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and mains capable of supplying the required fire fib' existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the Water supply may consist of reservoirs, pressstreetorroadfrontingtheproperty. Said numbers shall contrast with their mains or other fixed system capable of supplying background. the requirements for fire flow,the chief may be 40 r c' '.AI le=1JL_'J u r —tU v --Iu v v Nr/ 51 z 4.10 ws i-11 M11N• 1\ 1\\ \ " . : s \) V lk 1 amelp•A '..‘, \. t ) _ r___,:--___--: t\ ) ra-mEr-- Aw— 111rit. , I ------ s t kl I i-S441"- 7..' 4::t°'. .: jit.,,,_ A\ ';`1 ' I; L,--- -----------\ \ '`\, \ 1 11 old i 1 4.- ./ -( -(. \ kiiit' Vq441— .";;;:•:' Mr" PN y I N i--- .,-±__-_:;.-'':,, V 11 1 is 1; l 4,,-- 4 44. „ , 1 \ ,,ts4\44, Fii, Eot. 1,;itp,6 \,,, 1..4. 40, 11 1 . I t. 51. via— ii ^ .4 „ I , 4 t, A', N\‘, 7!,.,liati., 1 sly , i . . _ r,s Ni: N„— erIFo- 4.4'P: tel r1 1'.< z,fir e ,\ ` 3N 3) 1. z z_____.,-_ xA.iiii , :616 7 - \ ,'1',\,vo\\ ii. I41/7 k 0 d_to;,,- ; 11 i 1 1 A 4.---_-___--(----------.11 Vt\10114p., 4r1olif; ,i ... T. 44 '' 1 \\*V4.11( I 2 Pr 7"--,isk4 ,,:' , A N- 7 -, . N , . ,\, 4t 1.riI A -='-6rit 7‘ \''\ t li k -. --. V ''*1?- d s's s' .\\\ s. c j (1 tea«n MI(tiN 61\) % ilt IA^.«. 1 s\, i 1 1,,slain NMOaNC 9@ N\ w"I—Id w1"1" 1 1H O klil3fiaot2n3aadnl , I i,.. 1 i 1 I )Wit, i, - .. - ,. - -. w 1 IV i L _i___ 77--- VNI\ (.` k\ \ " iiAkN—":7-1—"—^- Zi i; #ii, ii l' i 1 1,•=0'----iiir I. ' Im 1 .. ,........ 1 1 ,i,\;,f, , q i _ ,s A,\,H, C.•-:-.-4 Li 11 i-' j )lilliUiseL1 l ..,i :„ 1, tll, t. dVW A11N131A GE ff.(OIIU 1 grrwmv m 01 a_ _ _Ao _y 370 F1151INta GRADE doeAI"fi*ackE y 360 ialiall1111.11111111"W' 5 = . lOp vc- 350 SGon-- i i I2 114-rs L PROPi05ED GRADE 3 4 0 10 1 I cZIal '- 7 N h'S e c-A''t t Ft7-________330 S-M'i oN oiv i SCALE HORIZONTAL 1'=20' SacTlON g- g VERTICAL 1'= 10' T4 IS 15 A PFord co1'Y ok0 LCU C--- cc PiAt.'` oP Tbk- PL.K JS p uIfZEid Fob Ns 2.3Rb ;T aM.-+eGE-Nc,r kA/ oftp KCC -SS . TLtS ol'LIcifNPtC. U' AS b S Lt g M 1-c-rE b To itT £ N * G lko'kv E to to s x AAA' M E A. AT Ttts E Q)p D P G k-t-A E mg- 19 f e g S " 1&Ai . F Ran-, TW t.r P°"ao T onJ v 0 o-"u 711-E f r 1 G 70 TH G% AT'=a/.( . 1 flhi ,c*$ BArrAb e 515 or VICINITY MAP w I ntt.va Q 7 ram+!- a' SAW al u, N Oa. i ' , j An • 11. i, i ill aLWy a-t..w. u _ _', S 1 t ,./ , \---k, ,. i 1 i,t,• i i ! i1 L - 446 ,, 1 9 5762 J 2g03A 1° f g 1 s.«rwt y 3,E5 7 abttn. -t• i N•. 0- 7 pi-, ll \ ki I k,1 I / \ as,00,.. f.. lit c 1 tt r o All.i.i. illig >1.iii 25-40% pp IA IL.' 10 L "„ ! I a 1112) s6'f x to C.. I ,V e•••••-_____. Ai i O 42 g It, NrI 1 , O • , t t 1 ili Iat N. r t17: AFfA of -r`1' E 101111111. Y‘4 ' 2) r aii to5 1 Z Q 7IZ7XI.' S82 1 1 a \ A to 1 i' If G i N Ian / F'r o f , '. ih e BA55b oN L.-fN (S L.cM'EN T MAP lip.ofrI coM PR-EN ENSUE PLAN Doct4MVNT 5}NG LE. VA M 8.8 Ac R s) 1 GREEN RELY 29.4 A ckas) SING LE EPA/1 )1Y 7 ?ekes) t_bw O t\IsITY Mu LT I- FANIIGY 49 Ac2 ) scAL : 2ZC FT/in) A T14c M ENT Sc FT STREET RIGIHI OF: wAt? I J a AREA t ar AcP.. GROSS ARtirt t AcRS ST ROES- _ R G HT eF Q ( AREA glIcKE j i 2.4 61 B 5.5 I•t- c 9.4. 1 .3 i ‘ I 29. I AcRE5 D l, ( 0.0 I 1 C...)... 7 I tI/Q I cRa'S 5,5 Ac1.E. I SCALE: Z 1- '/„i ATTACMMMENT H STREET E 1--Z7oi 1.] R_1cs uT or A ILEA c.R R Fr_-T60 P°R hitelit 1. Acgc, R 1 G HT o f w M( rect. S TR-£'E 1S R . N.Vro N t'''-2709 4-2,7oo1 co p SfcTIoN A. . g. 0 3 3.MRXI'Amen SLOPE AREA A XE-A No. D F ALt,owA$L& AASA Z.0ti1 GROSS AVE. , REDttcT1oW coRRKTs-6 cork REc -A Fok tANITS u'NlTS LE'VrER CLASS AASA SLopJ= PE2CtNTASS FID ft 5Lops 24)% REccr1oi1/41 PAR ALLoWASi-t ACRES DA, A. Ac12.E5 ProR R-I Ac UNITS ft-ouNtltb To NEARAST u+LN )T A R-2 2 .4 16.4 26/0 2 .4 0.7 I,-7 1 ,7 12 . I 20,4. g R- S.5 S % o 5. 5 1.+ 4, I 3.3 6 ,0 11. 8 c R- l 1.4 8 D/ 0 0 1.4 1.3 S.1 4,.5 6.0 31.0 b R,-l I , I 5 % 0 1. 1 0.0 1.1 0.1 6.0 5,1- S CA- 1 29. 1 5 0 ,6 70 D/ 0 S ./ 0,6 $ .1 g. I I . 0 8. 1 TOTAL I2,, '93 ik g + Ti w ST ofSTol 14-'0N.`t GRES K 5 CG + b + iZE 707Pry. ... tSr of 4' 1A-B110oNE`f cfzZ.SK PST T- tclk M Sc N T I ATTf‘< ' MINT S n S E 4-, X t o s VICINITY MAP 0 r PO MIS. ei . •_•.... ..",.....„---- „„:„.„,„ - 7...__- .„-- 4.-, .... - 1 i 1 I 4, i. Ylnd 4 • ah I a . ' r aroma 1:•,' y lily 1 V,, C.. t. Ili 1 4.4.442.. D." 4....„ 1 ',„......;•FC;g4.... r..... ..7. Z...."'. 1 r I I \,, I. ..LL....2,; ,1 __‘ \:. li 1 i A V 4 y ' i. X to 29 2S Y - I 4iii irt$121 Z4 .. 1 la 1 ,..1...•sq;,::11, \\ Ilk \ sa Nip411,-\ o 1,1 F ti 1,F1; i,a5"ta ;' tY t \1 ri n(} i el P ' ri C r it L , R o( prcc FSSN51: . k 5innatv- Tssfiliitby ;; 12 U f2 ram_ 110 t {IY1 elk r" 3FaspF M rit---1 I 1 wbNE uN cl 1 419 r g'2 14- R-I ( asr 37 4 1 RE- I ( WEsTI0 * IS ' Fr 1 r 1 Iz iIi 1 , 1 ' ToTP 7+• C r w. 2 sar tE 2,3 1 ..,..... o. : ALE .22.(+/)N t W ST j' t:•. y(_* NOTE: VALtk€ FRoM ATTPrc-WA4ZN) , rlAi.o I a NOTE 1 2 uNrr5 Pi R LOT FoR R-Z A I 11 f9 9d? I f7 POP A•:•b:,1 03 94 M5 aN 4A1a" 1 it I 71. i PACIFIC COAS? R- w Ii ' Krwi— EME nag. * 111. 9° P CA457 R 4. M a.A-v. f ELEMENTARY \ii f1e N SGNOoI a d a XL as: - q fn rt•i ' t • 27! IV RENT. 7' r y' t Lhs iil Z. . N CIT LIMIT, 1 IiL77 I 7 tf7 a I r Li L74 1 27• L40 2571 zfzz f I LQ4 1 1 L7S L7f 1 ^ A ; I t KENNY- ds r! DALErLSSL02274ri274LICN9ix2125IT. 205 1 1 r+ I PARK f • rl.. 1 LJI1itIIr 1 am E1=,.O sl i'r.- s i 1 ' iR a iwj . rrl no II n Tom B RG f, cs4 Z55 Z75 z42 z35 - ' • an r a..a`., i t '', . • , 1,• 1 NE 23RD Sr ; ice" I L 22S r1!r :,, cf! L99 204 Z L - Z43 :7Z_, Z4S 1I Zl i„ 1: I , I i 11 . . . :• . 1, 54. „., . ,,,, r Or isariooteivird.lir I, Z• .y i1= Mom` IC..: a ki w .' I t!t ass 2 1.-a+ z91 2115 Z[)A 1 IICOL $4#4 'met:11'1. Ilie-Li-': .-•.- k r.„ -. ILIF i .-. ,..-• ,;; atur, 1 I I K.4,..:H j61407 7' se m r r +L NORTH .+/' 1 4Qy r Wit. ES A HIGHI.A ! /ram CO11 f i oa 4. r--. 1-' gm+ 11 ,pit` i,,,.1,- , 1:' ._t . , L4e Z4V i La1 Z2a I 21 1' ,e'i i li n f, ~ • 1 1R NIGH 1tt+ r w. f 1 I SGH00L f! i r t' t 11 f) 4 .es ! LGS z47 c4-r i Zoo 2Z9 e II '' J. 12 s, • S T 14-4 l i ,, • I i t d I ' r ' +i ' • 1 S_1 1 a r alli 1 c •14 I ,t'! • i Iio;/ 1, 1 71 r. 0 rvD1cRT>`S THS L,oc, c} TIo V o F TFt & PRo Pos&t, a_xTE-N 5‘01v oP J at~ FERsoN AV& NE E,ETWEEN N - 2lsT sTRE4.T AND NZ- 7_31zC, 'STREET. PgopoSED E TNS(ON ® wotALtt cALASE MAr\1`f 10E0PI- - IN AREA Q TO IASc M 23Rp S.TRET f oR Acc ESS r- 1-0 S A-rracIAMaN i Ik 045SN FINAL DE ORATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANC_ , .EVISION) Application No(s): R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-014-84 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, R-2 and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium devel- opment having 185 housing units. This revised application is to be constructed in two phase. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek. Proponent: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal: Property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Lead Acency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on February 8, April 25, June 13 and July 11, 1984, fcllowing a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock, Robert Bergstrom, Gene Williams, Jerry Lind, and others. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-01 4-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Bob Tomberg and Mick C. Santa, dated January 11, 1984. 2.Applications: Rezone (R-014-84) and Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPUD-015-84). 3. F evised plans received April 16, 1984 and July 11, 1984. 4. F ecommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Parks and Recreation Department, Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1.The project has been reduced in scale from 185 units to 99 units all located on the south side of Honey Creek. 2.Access to the subject project shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E., N.E. 21st Street, and N.E. 23rd Street. N.E. 23rd Street shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City from the project's west property line to Harrington Place N.E. Jefferson Avenue shall be extended northward to connect with N.E. 23rd Street and shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City. Any additional property remaining west of the Jefferson Avenue extension shall also be di3dicated along with said street. SIGNAT,JRES: Ronald G. Nelson Michael Parne-ss Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: July 16, 1984 APPEAL DATE: July 30, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION No(s) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF Brief Description of Project : PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON: APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 99 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE VICTNTTY nF TT-RP 79no PLOCu .nF EFFEn ON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 48.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : 30% IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Lirect/Indirect Air Quality: x 3 ) Water & Water Courses :x 4) Plant Life: x 5) Animal Life: x 6) Noise: x 7) Light & Glare: x 8) Land Use; North: UNDEVELOPED PARK East : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL South: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL West : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: MINOR 9) Natural Resources : X 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : X 13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 782 ADT (7.9 TRIPS/UNIT X 99 UNITS) Traffic Impacts : MINOR 14 ) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : Ronald G. Nelson Michael arness Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor PUBLISHED: JULY 16, 1984 Ri hard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE: JULY 30, 1984 Pblic Works Director 6-83 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO REZONE 48.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-I , R-1 & R-21 AND FOR APPROVAL OF A PRFIIMINARY PUD CONSISTING OF A NLITI- FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION C]O®ES VA DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT W0(LL 1VVILL NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., JULY 30, 1984 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants 105July11, 1984 l JUL 1 ,_ 1984 City of Renton Attn: Roger Blaylock Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Declaration of Non Significance Our Project #83-47 Santa Tomberg Property Application No. R-014-84, PPUD 0015-84 Mr. Blaylock: In accordance with our previous discussion, we have requested a meeting with the planning staff and the fire marshalls office to discuss emergency access requirements as provided for in the above listed declaration of non significance. This meeting was held on Monday, June 9, 1984. In this meeting we requested that the condition of emergency access be voided. As it now reads the emergency access is to be provided south from the site connecting to either Kirkland place or N.E. 18th Street. Due to the extreme slopes in this area, this solution is not practical or possible. We reviewed the possible options for providing an acceptably emergency access. There are four. A discussion of each follows. An accompanying drawing is also provided. Option 1: This option provides for an expanded intersection with a center island. This option would help slow traffic at the intersection and minimize the possibility that a single accident would block the entire intersection. Access is still available through Jefferson and 21st Street. Option 2: This option deletes the westerly portion of the loop road replacing it with an emergency vehicle access road. A cul-de-sac is then placed near the end of the main drive in the vicinity of building A. Option 3: This option eliminates the intersection of the access roads to the site, replacing it with an emergency vehicle only connection. Option 4: This option provides for an emergency vehicle access connection to N.E. 23rd Street. There exists a 20 foot wide right of way there now. In order to construct a 20 foot clear roadway, an additional 5 or 10 feet or easement would be required. In that an easement is required from another party, it may not be possible to obtain such with absolute certainty. Architecture, Engineering &Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L.Allwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton,Washington 98055 206)271-7200 (206)623-5732 Roger Blaylock 2- July 11, 1984 Santa Tomberg Property The above described options for emergency vehicle access are listed in order of preference, with option 1 being our most desirable preference. I hope this letter provides some further assistance to you and the Environmental Review Committee in resolving the emergency vehicle access problem. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, HNSON , DESICIN-GROUP P.S., INC. Law e Braun , P.E. LSB:. r, 0. 14ra % VA T. JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering &planning consultants July 2, 1984 f,. r.,\ C tly Cit' M`iroi TO Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Lid JUL —2 1984" S L!LJ Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South r+,,: Renton, WA 98055 i!:. r fitly Re: Santa/Tomberg PUD/R-014-84 PPUD-105-84 Mr. Blaylock: Please accept this letter as our request for an extension of time in order to investigate alternate means of ingress and egress for emergency vehicle access for the above referenced project. We would appreciate a meeting at your earliest convenience to appraise you of the alternatives we are investigating. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, NSON ='__ . DESI ROUP P.S., INC. 4.4VW.gagilA ‘ awrenc- Brau d, '. . LSB:smb I Architecture, Engineering &Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L. Allwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 206)271-7200 (206)623-5732 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO.R-014-84, PPLD-015-84, ECF-014-84 PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION TO REZONE 48.5 ACRES FROM G-1 To G-1 R, R-2 AND !=0R APPROVAL OF A PRFI I MI NARY RID CONSISTING OF A Mil T I FAM I l Y cow ilF ! - OPI"ENT HAVING 99 HOUSING UNITS. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED [N THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE NE, POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE 'CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE a E.R.C. ) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION EIDOES 4 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:a0 P.M., JULY 2, 1984 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Applicat ion No(s): R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-014-84 Descript ion of Proposal:Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, and R-2 and for.approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium development having 185 housing units. This revised application is to be constructed in two phases. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek. Proponent: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal: Property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This prcposal was reviewed by the ERC on February 8, April 25, June 13, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, David Clemens, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, Roger Blaylock, Robert Bergstrom, James Hanson, James Bourasa, Gene Williams, and Jerry Lind Incorpoi ated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-014-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Bob Tomberg and Mick C. Santa, cated January 11, 1984. 2.Applications: R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84; revised plans/received April 16, 1984. 3. F;ecommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Parks and Recreation Department, Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.)30(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1. he project has been reduced in scale from 185 units to 99 units all located on the outh side of Honey Creek. 2. E:econdary emergency access will be provided south from the subject site to either b:irkkand Place N.E. or N.E. 18th Street. SIGNAL URES: onald G. Nelson David R. e ens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ric arcs C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLIEHED: June 18, 1984 APPEAL DATE: July 2, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION No(s ) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES Brief Description of Project : OF PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF REN'TON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPER['Y FROM G-1 TO—G-1, R-1 and R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI FAMILY CONDO- M1NI.JM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 99 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEEtERSON AVENUE N.E. SITE AREA: 48.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : 30% IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : X 2) Direct/ Indirect Air Quality: X 3 ) Water & Water Courses : X 4 ) Plant Life : X 5 ) Animal Life : X 6) Noise : X 7 ) Light & Glare : X 8 ) Land Use; North: UNDEVELOPED PARK East : SINGT,E FAMILY RESIDENTIAL South: SINGT F FAMILY RESIDENTIAL West : SINGT T; FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: MINOR 9 ) Natural Resources : X 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings :X 13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 782 ADT (7.9 TRIPS/UNIT X 99 UNITS) Traffic Impacts :MINOR 14) Public Services : X 15 ) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18 ) Aesthetics : X 19 ) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Siglatures : onald G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director PUBLISHED: JUNE 18, 1984 R. chard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE: DULY 3, 1984 Public Works Director 6-83 con_n< T'nonn +7 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON 8e 4?- COUNTY OF KING ss. E a. a) §. 1^oaiN4 Cindy Strupp Z o - Y being first duly sworn on o W ' C.) a ,o r Zvi she . chief clerk g $ E.4 4 oath,deposes and says that is the of A a THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a 0- 2 3 . week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, 6•i o v 6.v - printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper a E 3 ui ('o o published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is a c z h F E now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the U o mcOr. aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record O t?1 • 03nChroniclehasbeenapprovedasalegalnewspaperbyorderoftheSuperioracE to Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Z 0201. h m o s.o Washington.That the annexed is a ERC u c a. c.1:8 ems" gei g Ig64111111h4 as it was published in regular issues(and CD Ec' .'aS2 1 r E E onotinsupplementformofsaidnewspaper) once each issue for a period 0 f 8 $ .. 8 io 0 Z iVAII 15<29illtEW Sa, of one consecutive issues,commencingon the • V E 111111 52 w• -a 18 th day of June 19 8 4 and ending the c75gN2$z i fs 15 b i iog jj59; d1 c (4'-i 2cq o day of 19 both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- 8 • Jj. JUI11;811E1;1 1 W 4 ,N scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee V...- o QV 2Zg $ t t W s42 charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 34• 2 0which C) b N' O 4 W li:A.has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the JDfirstinsertionandperfolioofohundredwordsforeachsubsequent s _ insertion. a li :IR1411 Y § C S 7.A.A_,,,,, w W a i s g i. J W W Chief C rk v o 3 lAFOVagF . 3 .. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 18th day of U ~_ m n vS K J e 84 Ai 0 . uj0ujwrz Piihb 2/ a! L. Notary Public in for the State of Washington, residing at K King County. Federal t Way Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. i i JUL VN#87 Revised 5/82 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-sign ficance for the following projects: ROD T. CRAWFORD (ECF-058-84) Application for Shoreline Management Exemption to redeck an existing floating dock on Lake Washington, file SME-005-84; property located at 5117 Ripley Lane North. THOMA`> S. AITON (ECF-062-84) Application for Shoreline Management Exemption to remove one piling and add two new pilings at the end of an existing dock, file SME-006-84; property located at 3837 Lal.e Washington Blvd. North. The En\ironmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with coinditions for the following project: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES (ECF-014-84) Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, and R-2, file R-014-84, and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium development having 99 housing units, file PPUD-015-84. This revised application is to be constructed in two phases. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek; potentially the total development could have +185 dwelling units; property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. PACIFIC RIM CONSTRUCTION (ECF-017-84) Special permit application for fill and grade permit to allow excavation of material and refill of import material totaling 200,000 cubic yards, file SP-019-84; property located on the premises of the Greenwood Cemetery at 3401 N.E. 4th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by July 2, 1984. Published: June 18, 1984 f1at Fr Date circulated : JANUARY31, 1984 Comments due : FEBRUARY 7, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES Brief Description of Project : OF PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RRNTON;APPT.TCATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REOU .STING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRETJMINARY P II T) OF A MTTT.TT-FAMTTY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED TN THE VTCTNTTY OF THE. 2200 RT.ncm nF TE.FFFRcnN AVENUE N F. SITE AREA : 48.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 30% DEVELOPED. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : I/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : r/ 5 ) Animal life : L 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : L ` 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( I T E ) : Vo rc,.ti s71re traffic impacts : Mi i,h,v/ /L e fie IA: 14-i,2 f i h flrui ke,st 11-‘34.1,;);t6 /74,d 5 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : Cr 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : C 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : S e_e A-t t_'a e_1,_+— Recommendation : DNSI DOS C More Information Viv Reviewed by : i/ Date : FORM: ERC-06 tillX3VCERNCA. i . Date circulated : JANUARY31, 1984 Comments due : FEBRUARY 7, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-014-84), PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES Brief Description of Project : OF PROPERTY INTO THES',TTY OF RENTON`APPT.TCATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1 , R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO RFOTTESTING FORAPPROVAT. OF A PRELTMINARY P I1 I) OF A M)TLTT-FAMTLY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED TN THE VTCTNTTY OF THE. M900 BT.nr1 nF TFFFFRRCN AVENUE N E. SITE AREA : 48.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 30% DEVELOPED. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : Ae 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : N/ 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information, Reviewed by : title : Date : 011/r FORM: ERC-06 INTEROFFICE MEMO T0: KPIff1v DATE: APRIL 19, 1984 FROM: JERRY LIND, ZONING DIVISION SUBJECT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE & PRELIMINARY PUD FILES : R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 Our department received the attached revised Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. site plan as required by the Environmental Review Committee. All development within the first plase of the project is to be sited on the south side of the creek. This plan calls for 99 units to be located on the south side and 86 units to be located on the north side in a future development phase. Please review and comment on this plan at your earliest convenience. This project will be rescheduled for ERC review on Wednesday, April 25th. mac um.DIY. fl9' APR 2e lin 0 u ' ( c,1 „i'ton e_vd-S c. 4 e a fol C Jai/L. 3/, rc u/a n 77 or( RE''• Tyr-4 . APR. 2.7 198 GLJiJi lG CJ Y. JVEIMENT Date circulated : JANUARY31, 1984 Comments due : FEBRUARY 7, 1984 ERVIRO\HENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-01518Z4 A f PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES POLICY DFVFLdFA9"•'T r1FFT. PROJECT TITLE : SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES Brief Description of Project : QF PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON;APPT.TCATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAT, OF A PRELIMINARY P II T) OF A MTTT.TT-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED TN THE VTCTNTTY OF THE 2200 RT.00V nF TFFFFRcfN AVENUE N F,• SITE AREA : 48.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 30°7 DEVELOPED. JAN 3 i 1984 IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR P DFV L FE!!lT DFPT. INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : v 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : v 3 ) Water & water courses : v 4) Plant life : f 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : v ' 8 ) Land Use ; north : Uhdeva1ppailQi f3.r.6C east : 5.•rt'/e i . i' ,4e J JJe14" south : west : I 0 1/ 0 Land use conflicts : v View obstruction : fV9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : legal br(7974-1ps/6millieleSvn' traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : r 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics :1. -- 19 ) Recreation : V i` 20 ) Archeology/history :/ " slCOMMENTS :A or it,44-T t S i ze 4eccesc fit fps 4.44.1' je77t.i r 440 bop r.t°t 4C 41 D/T a"4 S p J ie+se• &vet t-A/4 %r. ed r li"..Q ; 44,4r ww.fereoGo .s 3 G i s Se.ve c rs// ir" jh V I(C o f e.r.. FAec1 e&t`ar+tt4t.Ci NW•s Recommendation : DNSI__,_ DOS, More Information Reviewed by : SieYp mu,t s dr n T itle : 14SSf S t 1-1 ahKtor Date :D' 8(84/ FORM: ERC-06 A Urf 1Lt1t_c0. 4u Date circulated : JANUARY31, 1984 Comments due : FEBRUARY 7, 1984 ENVIIRONMENITAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-014-84), PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES Brief Description of Project : OF PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON;APPT.TCATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REOIIESTINC FOR APPROVAL OF A PRET.TMTNORY P II n OF A MULTI-FAMIT.Y CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED TN THE VTCTNTTY OF THE 22Q0 RT.00K OF TFFFFRcON AVENUE N FS. I SITE AREA : 48.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 3070 DEVELOPED. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7) Light & glare : v7 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : T 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : 11 S DOS More Information Reviewed by : i_ .-w- l itle : WilluiY (14)"16 A__ Date : 217h4- FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : JANUARY31, 1984 Comments due : FEBRUARY 7, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES Brief Description of Project : OF PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON;APPT.TCATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM C;1 TO G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REOUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P U T) nF A MULTT-FAMTLY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED TN THE VTCTNTTY OF THE 9700 RT.nrx nF TFFFFRSnN AVENUE N E. SITE AREA : 48.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 30% DEVELOPED. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : ` JdI„ Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information` Reviewed by : litle : Date : / e.- 3.-/ 1 FORM: ERC-06 1.)1 L.0 I rvG, 1 I. Date circulated : JANUARY31, 1984 Comments due : FEBRUARY 7, 1984 ENIVIRONIMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION No (s ) . REZONE (R-014-84), PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLL : SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES Brief Description of Project : OF PROPERTY INTO THE CTTY OF RENTON;APPT.TCATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO C-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REOITESTTNG FOR APPROVAL OFA PRET.TMTNARY P ii n OF A MTTT.TT-FAMTLY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED TN THE VTCTNTTY OF THE 7700 RT.oCK OF TFFFFRcnN AVENUE N E. SITE AREA : 48.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 30% DEVELOPED. IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : X I 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise :k 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : X 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : K 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 2OJaz GA., evic,) L 3oc1 iz 14 ) Public services : A' E-S . ST`. e-7- 15 ) Energy : X 16 ) Utilities : 1 i 17 ) Human health : 18)- Aesthetics : K 19 ) Recreation : x 20 ) Archeology/history : J( I COMMENTS : SalG5 C;.uC. AtPoKT .v3( Pc:T: , A ,s ZA,z. .,.v4QCoG 1 SL6,o4's 86 -‘43' e1,0¢ 7 / NQicn7e' Linni rS 0 F C e-e.7 4g 1-v4. 4.141? AJtbea7 P Z Oi`s soLi ti‘ir, Recommendation : DNSI / DOS More Information Reviewed by • ,.6-x `(- 1 itle : Date : 2- fit FORM: ERC-06 Ail Ur K 1 o BUILDING 6. ZONING DEPARTMENT fNA z 200 Mill Avenue South j N11 ati s7 a 7? Y gon 98055 11f{ D- "3 Fn"" ERenton,Washington EO SEPT - 1{ JLN 1 5 '8ll ti' x G : fsr& nil `.b,sy;„ , '.31 / cm E p y rQ ti 1 8201E43ItFei n'ps1 SPe U'• lie,' s,, y e,), s„ ! O Oo sucy sh 0, k7'' el or e oy h°t orsC.c. ', "...,.. a, 1,61'-/14 Mr. Mel - _ter 1 : fy, r ee Johnson : aundDesignGrow0:-..,-- 0O` eio Suite 0 P, : d 4, x'y Rento , Wa. 98055 CI `` J OF R 4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z _• p9 'MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 9yrFo SE.P1E e` P June 15, 1984 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Mr. Mel Easter Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Mail Ave. S. Suite 200 Renton, WA 98055 Reference: Santa/Tomberq PUD/R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Dear Mel: The Environmental Review Committee considered the revised alternative that you submitted dated June 7, 1984, to provide a secondary means of emergency access to the Honey Creek PUD site. Their determination was that, as presented, it was unacceptable and that access must be provided to the south per your original proposed design. It does appear that there is City right-of-way approximately 15 to 20 feet south of your property line. Therefore, they have issued a declaration of non-significance conditioned upon providir g emergency access to the south. Under ;appeal procedures of the City of Renton, you have 14 days from the date of publication, which will be on June 18, 1984, to appeal this condition if you so desire. Appeals must be submitted to the Land Use Hearing Examiner prior to 5:00 p.m. on Monday, July 2nd. Specific criteria for evaluating appeals is established in Section 4-3014 of the L and Use Hearing Examiner code. If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 235-2550. Sincere y, For the Environmental Review Committee: Roger . Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:0915Z:wr JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants c.:;71 C' P.Zi4TON June 7, 1984 0 I" (Fr) I tI Vie, Ir j1.1 JUN l 1 1984 Roger G. Blaylock Zoning Administrator Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. Our Project #83-47 Roger: After evaluating the emergency access connection shown on the latest site design proposal issued April 16, 1984, we would submit the enclosed alternative for your consideration. The area shaded yellow indicates an asphalt paved section which forms a loop road system around the entire project. The area shaded red is a minimum width gravel road with knockdown posts at each end to be used only when the intersection (blue asterik) or N.E. 21st Street entry road is blocked. We hope you find this alternative access design resolves the concerns for emergency service. Please discuss this with the appropriate City Department(s) and contact me for re-submission of the revised plan. If you have questions or need additional information, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. 7//74,/0 gt,-<7 Melvin R. Easter Enclosure cc: Bob Tomberg Architecture, Engineering & Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson, AIA Greg L. Aliwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 206) 271-7200 (206)623-5732 0 OF R4,' L4 4 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 2 i =„h o 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09, SEP1E 0 P BARBARA 'f. SHINPOCH MFYOR June 1, 1984 Mel Easter Johnso i Braund Design Group 304 Main Street South Suite 400 Rentor, WA 98055 Reference: Environmental Review - Preliminary PUD/Honey Creek Associates Emergency Access Dear Mel: First, let me apologize for not providing you written confirmation of the requested information from the Environmental Review Committee concerning secondary access to the Honey Creek Associates' Planned Unit Development site. The Environmental Review Committee considered a second proposed development plan for the southwestern portion of the Honey Creek site. Prior to their making a final deterrrination on the project, it was necessary to determine how the secondary access point shown in the southeast corner of the site would actually function. As shown on your plans, it deadends and does not provide any emergency access as intended. It would appear that this extension would have to go through to either Kirkland Place or possibly N.E. l E Ith Place. Until a specific design is shown connecting your site with existing City streets to the south, the Environmental Review Committee will not make a formal decision. However, we wcluld hope that the problem is resolved in a timely fashion, which should be approximately 30 to 45 days from now. If you believe it will take longer than that to resolve the problem and create the necessary design work, we would appreciate a projected timeline from your office. For the Environmental Review Committee: Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:0030Z:wr 411, I NT!EROFF I CE MEMO TO: 22AIKK ) K DATE: R A"rlOtqF APRIL 19, 1984 FROM: JERRY LIND, ZONING DIVISION SUBJECT: R F R 2 3 ]SHONEYCREEKASSOCIATESREZONE & PRELIMINARY PUD 84, FILES : R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 Our department received the attached revised Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. site plan as required by the Environmental Review Committee. All development within the first plase of the project is to be sited on the south side of the creek. This plan calls for 99 units to be located on the south side and 86 units to be located on the north side in a future development phase. Please review and comment on this plan at your earliest convenience. This project will be rescheduled for ERC review on Wednesday, April 25th. S U ti 7 S i G D e V L a ,rm env r 71i/9.S Av ; m /Ai 04 tic. % o ems 1= ac /c. / / ef- s T// /J Scrdn S 3 /9 S Cl /9 0 ,1)77(74 v i/ /if v et (/SCE dl Ai-Ud L 7/f/5 /d' 1459, . GC) 0 41 c_ D P LA 7 N O iu J /0- O u7acidie fight—i r74 U du2T '74 41 ex.) /P 2-d -n p! . G!G 7/0 g/e, S Environmental Review CAI ittee April 21i, 1984 Page 2 40 The Police Department earlier noted that full development (as originally proposed) by the applicant would require an additional police car, approximately 4.5 more employees, and costs in excess of $100,000. By limiting development to the west side, these increased burdens apparently will not be necessary. An easement for a public trail along Honey Creek needs to be obtained as advised by the Parks and Recreation Department. A sanitary sewer easement is suggested as a possibility. Foot paths and basketball courts for on-site are also advised to mitigate impacts upon the North Highlands Recreational Center. 10 As for utilities, the Honey Creek interceptor is to be installed and operational prior to issuance of any building permits. An adequate storm drainage and retention system must also be provided. The Utilities Engineering Division will review such plans and monitor construction for compliance. 4' The subject site is located in an area designated "Greenbelt" on the City's Comprehensive Plan. Much of the site is well over the 25% slope standard. Although not in effect, the City's recommended policies suggest that in areas of 25-40% slope, development should be limited to 25% site coverage. It would appear that the schematic site plan is well within these limits. Toward this end, future detailed plans are to include boundary lines designating the limits of clearing and these should be surveyed on the site prior to initial clearing. INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: DATE: APRIL 19, 1984 FROM: JERRY LIND, ZONING DIVISION SUBJECT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE & PRELIMINARY PUD FILES: R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 Our department received the attached revised Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. site plan as required by the Environmental Review Committee. All development within the first plase of the project is to be sited on the south side of the creek. This plan calls for 99 units to be located on the south side and 86 units to be located on the-north side in a future development phase. Please review and comment on this plan at your earliest convenience. This project will be rescheduled for ERC review on Wednesday, April 25th. V V The revised proposal for the Santa/Tomberg PUD, though easier for us to serve, still presents some problems that need be addressed. 1. The narrow roadways in the existing residential area are inadequate to handle the estimated increase in vehicular traffic. 2. When the second phase of the development is constructed it will necessitate the additional personnel and district (including a vehicle) . 3. Building will be numbered - West A-B-C, etc. and East A-B-C 4. Proper security devices on all doors requiring same. 5. Adequate site lighting. 6. What is the grade % for emergency access? Capt. H. Bourasa Renton Police Department I t MEMORANDUM TO Jerry Lind, Zoning Division DATE 4-23-84 j FROM Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal SUBJECT Honey Creek Associates Rezone & Preliminary PUD Files: R-014-84/PPUD-015-84 ECF-014-84 Access depicted on the revised site plan does not provide sufficient details to indicate how it will connect to the present Kirkland Place N.E. Additional information is needed on proposed grade of the access road. (Eight percent allowed without application to the Board of Public Works for variance.) Access proposed should be an extension of the private drive and be open to the public without barricades. Cul-de-sac with planting islands will be required to be marked "Fire Lane No Parking" unless islands are removed. Detailed water utility and other fire protection required will be made at the time of the building permit application. JFM:mbt CITY th RENTON r DAPR241984 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 4 INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: U 1 L DATE li(U n'(-,APRIL 19, 1984 FROM: JERRY LIND, ZONING DIVISION SUBJECT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE & PRELIMINARY PUD FILES: R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 Our department received the attached revised Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. site plan as required by the Environmental Review Committee. All development within the first plase of the project is to be sited on the south side of the creek. This plan calls for 99 units to be located on the south side and 86 units to be located on the north side in a future development phase. Please review and comment on this plan at your earliest convenience. This project will be rescheduled for ERC review on Wednesday, April 25th. j/Aot,s rs o C Xe 4 u 4 7io// I `441 1-6.6 SOILS t J(o_ JOI iNSON-BRAC 00F pG 6G"170`l° Lq:Db DESIGN GROUPvitiNce 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 200 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 DATE JOB NO. April 16, 1984 83-47 RENTON 271-7200 SEATTLE 623-5732 ATTENTION Roger Blaylock RE TO City of Renton Santa/Tomberg Building and Zoning Dept. Site Plan Revision for Preliminary P.U.D. Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 WE ARE SENDING YOU Xi Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION 7 sets 1 ea. Revised site plan - blueline prints. Ed]O ONIN(3Z/DNIGlllcd 17861 9 T ddd iUNOINh THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS Roger, Please notethe following site revisions: 1 ) Provided an additional 26 units by adding a third story to bldgs. A, B, C, D, E, F. 2) Added parking stalls required for additional 26 units. 3) Added an emergency access lane to connect Kirkland Place N.E. with the cul de sac. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. COPY TO Jaye Clemens, Bob Tomberg, Mick Santa SIGNED: Melvin R. Easter PRODUCT2163 Lam)inc.-.ratan.Man 014)1 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. IP OF R4, 1 IR ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR NalL 110MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co- 0 9gT 0 ,EPjE P BARBARA f. SHINPOCH M<.YOR March 21, 1984 Mr. Boh Tomberg, D.D.S. 5611 - 119th Avenue S.E. Bellevi e, WA 98006 SUBJE HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES - Rezone & Preliminary PUD File R-014-84; PPUD-015-84; ECF-014-84 Dear Mr. Tomberg: The Renton Environmental Review Committee is in receipt of your letter dated March 8, 1984, stating your confirmation to modify the above referenced PUD application as recommended by our committee. As we stated in our letter of March 1, 1984, that because the project is functionally divided by the ravine, greater environmental impacts are of great concern for the northeast portion of the site in respect to distance and response time for police and fire services. By limiting development at this time to the southwest corner of the site, we feel that you are approaching this situation in the right direction. In orcer for the committee to make its final environmental determination, we are requesting that you notify your architect to prepare a revised site plan detailing your intent ons. The plan should also incorporate a concern we had addressed for secondary access to the southwest portion of the site. This was detailed in our letter of March 1. PleasE submit four prints of this revised site plan, along with any other pertinent information, to the Building & Zoning Department at your earliest convenience so that an envircnmental declaration can be made. Until this is accomplished, the application will remai i on our agenda under Pending Business. For the Environmental Review Committee: Rog el J. Bla lock Zoning Administrator RJB:: FL:se:0760Z cc: Thomas A. Johnson, AIA Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Street S., Suite 400 Renton, WA 98055 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting March 19, 1984 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF ROBERT J. HUGHES, Council President ; EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. COUNCIL MEMBERS TRIMM, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KATHY A. KEOLKER. CITY STAFF IN BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; DAN KELLOGG, Assistant City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; DAVID R. CLEMENS, Policy Development Director; RICHARD C. HOUGHTON, Public Works Director; BATTALION CHIEF JAMES MATTHEW, Fire Department. PRESS Pat Jenkins, Renton Record-Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 1984 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted Sinnett 75% and published according to law, Mayor Shinpoch opened the Annexation public hearing to consider simultanteously the Sinnett 75 Petition and annexation petition and rezone request (File No. R-007-84) ; Request for 3. 7 acres of property located on the west side of Powell Rezone Avenue SW between SW Langston Road (extended) and SW Third R-007-84) Place (extended) . Policy Development Director Clemens apprised the Council of Hearing Examiner approval of the rezone from G-1 to R-1 on 3/5/84 subject to approval of the annexation by the City Council and the King County Boundary Review Board. The subject hearing represents the first of two separate public hearings to be held at least a month apart required by the new procedure; if Council determines the annexation and rezone are appropriate, the public hearing should be closed and an additional public hearing be set for April 23, 1984 to again consider the annexation and rezone. Continued Utilizing a King County Assessor' s map and the Comprehensive Plan map displayed in the Chambers, Mr. Clemens designated the location of the subject site, noting city boundaries exist on three sides of the proposal . The area is predominantly developed with single family residential homes; and approval of the subject requests would allow development of a 16-lot plat. The proponent has agreed to accept the city' s Comprehensive Plan, zoning and bonded indebtedness as stipulated on the 75% petition. Continued Discussion indicated that recent revision of R-1 zone combined SR and R-1 classifications into a single zone requiring 7500 square foot lot size and 75-foot frontage width. Responding to concerns regarding access, Mr. Clemens indicated that specific access alternatives would be reviewed upon submission of site development plans. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, SECOND PUBLIC HEARING BE SET FOR APRIL 23, 1984, TO CONSIDER THE SINNETT ANNEXATION AND REZONE PROPOSALS. CARRIED. PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted Honey Creek 10% and published according to law, Mayor Shinpoch opened the Notice of Intent public meeting continued from March 5, 1984 to consider the Petition to Honey Creek 10% Notice of Intent Petition to annex 116 acres Annex located north and east of NE 27th Street in the area commonly known as "Devil ' s Elbow." Policy Development Director Clemens reviewed correspondence from his department which responded to several questions raised at previous public meeting. The first question, related to development potential as stipulated on the Comprehensive Plan, is answered as follows: Area A - approximately 185 dwelling units; Area B - approximately 100-150 dwelling units; Area C - 60 platted lots which could be developed with availability of sanitary sewers; and Area D - King County A Renton City Council 3/19/84 Page two Public Meeting (Honey Creek Annexation) continued Continued property located in proposed May Creek Park reveals potential for only a few single family lots. Continued Question No. 2, access routes: Area A - from Jefferson Ave. NE and NE 21st Street from the southwest , and from 122nd Ave. SE from the north; Area B - NE 16th and NE 18th Streets on the west and NE 17th Street on the east; Area C - via Union Ave. NE by SE 100th and 102nd Streets and SE 104th Streets (narrow, circuitous streets) . Continued Question No. 3, fiscal impacts to Fire and Police Departments: Fire - development of areas east of Honey Creek would require relocation of existing Highlands Fire Station easterly towards Union Avenue NE and construction of the Kennydale station at an annual cost estimate of $500,000 (15-man contingent) . Police - additional patrol area to serve east side of Honey Creek Valley would require approximately four and one-half additional officers (approximately $150,000) . Capital cost estimates for contruction and relocation of Fire Stations are premature with possibility of approximate half-million dollar expenditure necessary for Kennydale station construction. Continued Question No. 4, cost of Devil ' s Elbow improvements: separation of ownership between the annexation proponents and King County Parks Department may allow the City to exclude from the annexation, portions of Devil ' s Elbow Road. However, there may be objection from both King County and the King County Boundary Review Board if these portions are excluded. Public Works Director Houghton indicated that provision of appropriate street drainage and repair of slide area on Devil ' s Elbow Road would cost approximately $300,000. However, even with those improvements, the street would not meet minimum standards. Continued Discussion indicated the proposed sewer trunk line will be sized from 12 to 15 inches to handle the entire plateau area; since the total Planned Unit Development is separated by Devil ' s Elbow Road, the developer has agreed to phase the timing of the project, depending upon the economy; Devil ' s Elbow Road to the south is not crucial to access on either side of the annexing area, but residents to the north will most likely use it to reach employment destinations to the west; the City is in the process of obtaining appraisals for the necessary easements and right-of-way through the canyon to proceed with the Honey Creek Interceptor. Continued Policy Development Department recommendation was reviewed as follows: The City should proceed with the proposed annexation of Areas A and B and refer the subject of further development north and east of Honey Creek to the Committee of the Whole for policy direction on future development and annexation proposals. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REGARDING AREAS A AND B. Deletion of Devil ' s Elbow Road from the annexation was discussed. Mr. Clemens stated Boundary Review Board policy to approve or deny annexation proposals, with no latitude for modification. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION TO READ THAT THE BOUNDARY Devil ' s Elbow LINE ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL A SHOULD FOLLOW THE Eliminated from CURVATURE OF DEVIL' S ELBOW WHICH WOULD ELIMINATE THE PANHANDLE Annexation TO THE NORTH. CARRIED. ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. It was noted that proponents of the rezone had agreed to accept the City' s zoning, Comprehensive Plan, and bonded indebtedness by signing the 10% petition. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Bid Opening and City Clerk reports bid opening 3/9/84 for Remodeling Project on Award for City First Floor of City Hall ; two bids received; Engineer' s Hall First Floor Estimate: $15,000.00. Refer to Parks Director. Parks Director Remodeling recommends acceptance of low bid submitted by Pioneer Project Construction Company of Redmond in the amount of $13,948. 14 includes Base Bid and Alternatives 1 and 2) . ADDED TO ADDED TO ITEM 6.a CONSENT AGENDA: Finance Director requests inclusion of Honey Creek Associates TBOB OMBERG, D.D.S. 5611 119TH S. E. BELLEVUE,WASH. 98006 746-6554 CiTY OF RENTON March 8, 1984 i ' le T 1? I \ MAR 12 1984 ' Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear Roger: Please accept this letter as confirmation of our intention tc modify our PUD application subsequent to your initial threshold determination. The changes are as follows: 1 . Redistribute 100 units to the west side of the creek leaving 85 units on the east. 2. Development to begin immediatly following approval by the City of Renton on the west side of Honey Creek. 3. Development on the east side of Honey Creek shall begin within 5 years of approval of this PUD or when the City of Renton notifies us it can service that side (whichever is first) . Approval of the east side shall be in general terms which may require revision at the time of development. We will provide more detailed drawings of our intentions following revision of your threshold determination in light of our modifications. We do not believe an Environmental Impact Statement should be required because 1 . ) we are only asking for 100 residential units at this time 2. )there will be little or no alteration to plant life as we will be constructing on the site of the old gravel pit where only a few alders and fir trees have volunteered following cessation of excavation 3. )we will not be in or near Honey Creek except to provide nature trails for public recreation 4. )we have yeilded to your desire to not develop the east side therefore not adversly impacting any city services or community traffic patterns. i I Your ongoing co-operation is deeply appreciated. Sincerely, / 7 rtC4/„Al Bob T6mberg Honey Creek Associates cc: Dave Clements BT/jw pF RR BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT qb RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 0gTtD scot-- C BARBARA Y SHINPOCH MA)OR March 1 1984 Mr. Thomas A. Johnson, A.I.A. Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Street S., Suite 400 Renton, WA 98055 RE: E wironmental Review - Preliminary PUD/Honey Creek Associates Dear Mr Johnson: The Environmental Review Committee has considered the preliminary comments from various city departments relating to the annexation and development of + 48.5 acres by the Honey Creek Associates. Each of the responses contained requests for the applicant to provide more information. These areas of concern included the following: 1) water and water ccurses; 2) plant life; 3) traffic; 4) public services; 5) utilities; and 6) recreation. This specific site is located within the designated greenbelt on the City of Renton's Compreh ensive Plan. As such, the area is considered to be a sensitive area under the environrr ental ordinances of the City of Renton and extraordinary caution is taken in reviewin j any project within such guidelines. In addition, when a piece of property is located .vithin an environmentally sensitive area, the threshhold for the Environmental Review Committee to require a full impact statement is much less than in other non-sens.tively designated properties. The Environmental Review Committee will require an environmental impact statement unless design modifications are made to the subject proposal. The project is functionally divided into two areas because of the ravine, and the adverse environmental impacts are substantially greater when considering the northeast portion of the site versus the southwest. This difference was based upon the responses from the Police ar d Fire Departments. In fact, the Police Department suggested that the project warranted placing another police car on duty which would require approximately 4-1/2 employees to support that position. This would mean an annual cost to the City well in excess of $100,000. The problems are distance and response time. Thomas A. Johnson, A.I.A. March 1, 1984 Page 2 The Fir» Department also had a problem with response time because of the long distance through the County to the northeast portion of the site. The Fire Department also had concern; about singular access to the southwest portion of the site. It does appear that a roadway may be extended to the south from the end of the cul-de-sac into the adjacent property and easements acquired for emergency access. These properties to the south of you will also require access for development at some point which will probably tie into the existing public streets of either Kirkland Place N.E. or N.E. 18th Street. In fact, you may wish to evaluate this possible access and to acquire and construct a street on this alignment instead of using the long access road that you presently show. The Environmental Review Committee must make an environmental determination based upon a project presented by the applicant. It may be of benefit to the applicant to evaluate dividing the project into two projects. It appears that the development of the southwe it property is much more acceptable environmentally even though there may be some technical design limitations because of slopes and topography. If I can tie of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, erre.' Roger J. Blaylock Zoning A dministrator RJB:se 0721Z 41111011 0320N ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA FEBRUARY 8. 1984 THIRC FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM: COMMENCING AT 10:00 A.M. PENDING BUSINESS: ECF-006-84 F RF_DERICK J. STIENER R-008-84 Application to rezone 0.8 acre of property from R-1 to B-1 to allow the construction of a two story office building having 17,500 square feet; located on the south side of S.W. Grady Way between Seneca Avenue S.W. and Raymond Avenue S.W. at approximately the 700 block. OLD BUSINESS: EC'F-0-7-83 ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS B-305 Application for building permit to construct a double-faced advertising sign measuring 12 feet by 25 feet; located on the north side of S.W. 43rd Street approximately 1,095 feet east of West Valley Road. NEW BUSINESS: ECF-U13-84 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SA-013-84 Application for site plan to allow the reconstruction of a municipal water supply well in a P-1 zoned district; located in the extreme north corner of Liberty Park, south of Bronson Way North and west of Houser Way North. ECF-014-84 HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES R-014-84 Application has been made to annex 48.5 acres of property into the PPUD-015-84 City of Renton; application is requested to rezone said property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, and R-2. Application is also requesting for approval of a Preliminary PUD of a multi-family condominium development having 185 housing units; located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. ECF-015-84 EARL BROWN B-308 Application for building permit to allow construction of two horse barns totalling 12,240 square feet and having 68 stalls; located between S.W. 16th Street and I-405 and west of Oaksdale Avenue at the 1200 block. rti` s' Or TY OF RENTO r FILE NO(S): f yl.)-j)/s b"/ f( ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT yr,r - OA'84-/- MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attoch additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES 1• -ek Associ ates Q REZONE*(FROM TO ADDRESS 5611 - 119th S.E. , Suite #2 CD SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, WA 98006 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* SITE PLAN APPROVAL TELEPHONE 206) 746-6454 0 GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON r--1 VARIANCEFrom Section: Justification Required NAME Thomas A. Johnson, AIA ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 0 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Renton, ',A 9800 ED PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 206) 271-7200 3 WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Honey Creek Associates ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 1000.00 5611 - 119th S.E. , Suite #2 F31 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP a FINAL Bellevue, WA 98006 P.U.D. NAME: Santa/Tomberq P.U.D. TELEPHONE 206) 74E-6454 GE ResidentialI J Industrial ElCommercial Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: XR9W€R1YXWIRCk5 A portion of the NW 1/4, n TENTATIVE Sec. 4, T 23 N, R5E, W.M. n PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING Undeveloped G ri FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Multi-family condominium development NUMBER OF SPACES: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE $560.00 . SQ, FT. ACRES AREA: 2,112 ,660 48.5 TOTAL FEES $1560.00 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DRAT 1 Y LJF' !M1Oi4 rtii : I: 34 APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: i l` APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: JANN 2 1984 O Accepted O Incomplete Notification Sent On By: 1,:Li.3;y G EZP Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: i 72 I - Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: Building Design Eng. ug FireAltr71 Parks MI Police EA Policy Dev. CZ Traffic Eng. LiS Utilities Legal description of property (If more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See Attachment "B" AFFIDAVIT tAEA e9b TornberaJ 6 i1G being duly sworn, declare that y axrr authorized representative to act for the property owner,®owner,of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of Wtknowledge and belief , SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 111A DAY OF , lAnitaA ( 19 81 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,RESIDING AT EE:0 G? &L L4A.Y LAA„ A.as M P/4,/ 1AI s Name of Notary Public) Si"h- u of .awn: ) 7412liP 7/“_f_Sy 1 r t/C-A/c/-cc°Q p/ A Kr 2f 52C r4 5:4# ti . Address) Address) City) State) (Zip) Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." i-attachment 'B' SEE REVERSE S!DE 196:1 HEAL LS IA1 t IAX IAILIYILN I 1, 12‘ .•".. • • JTNUMBER KING COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTON 41 .. B es7i. i., 0-2 2._13 1. - % c.:::) Steie ficrxiol Suprion V.:::s.-. 1 Lc:AI Schcc!Supticiri iii•C . ICcurii;- 7.:. •:i•-•.. ,. • <'-cNN• •• .. .- . I ed.... IIRc.,-sd N\--. • :i Frirl i Fite ' - . 1 Library 7 sat.4..:.T.e.-sr.rtn! ANT A .11ICK C 1 N32-23 7c-fi Ai ir..1•;-,itt_ii-r i A;;,. . 4 411 iISS-.PINE -LK -•-RD .-SE- rust, win SSAQUAI-1-.1iA . . . .... . - - 98027 t.:,t:i_ 7::..?-- IT:.;CF:.' T-"..‘1.11--:;.7.ft•L::?..-4.,-:--.7r-t:ifg-t-IBLOCIC=CDDETir:age!'.47.1NCiti. .1? ' ANN i JAI Elm.-r.•*:::.!i- Si H. 9 0 22-.: ',4 15 5.-. )4 ..23 05 sc....--Dr,, f,311 la: RYE NW "1/4 LESS. PO IR •LI': N 0 F iv.,-:-.:-.!;:11:10C-TOR: N.BEG ON "E "LN .OF *Ntil':1"14 131.;.4- FT --S OF. ITS --NE: CO R TH -.111 TO a fi T-:Oril.-tV-LN.r.OF- E 132;..--.0F.7:..N le."•17.4 • 132 T.T S.ETC SEE'REVERSE,S!,..)E 198' T NUMBER :.. :.- 1- 3 ils_.-9 0 D 7_.:.-08 -.-.--: -<",-z ci.:".. . 'state&Ir.:Am...F•uriginri LN\ , . r.- -1.'' ' " i:''',1-‘ - Ii . Ny. - . . i....? N \--,..- -- _ I-cc:0,.:-..tiii.-11 F:i.sprziri b : 1.7.: ' ."' ....t-:-•.. - -_-: • - -. ' '\ t O./ • ' 1: t.--.-;:...' tq - - -•-- - - - ,:. Serivei Wcw Vvat.er. , LIMARTS WHEN PAYI N GI N PERM)N- -:-:"-- -..-• .. Library t::".-: •:-•:!-:.... :-:".:; %:--." --:-.-7'!.:--,:Y.;-..:.:.:'--,''...-f-F'`--:-. ..... :- . CIM.7 - - - 7.-.. .4 .-' !-':::•;1'.."'"--:"..1:' -:::L 7 .• ....7.... -Pi---rat•-n-:--:ut.ci s.: i,.........:-.....,.: 1-.....-..,,-.--;-,-...-_--,,,-.•.----,--_--..------ ----• ..--,.. Spix.-4:".szt.easmerit A NT A ;III(K:-•"•C -..'•-• - -- :"---_-:-:----• I.:- ..--:: 1 N29 8'9 jci-GIC CJFIfiEN:TAX Pi 4. ISS A QUAH-PINE;LAKE.. •RD -S-E .- - l nal!irs. ..r.,;,-i ix ex SSAQUAH.:VA :.-v.--:.e: ::..--..-_-;...e"--;.- -:: •'-•::-.- 9 8027 - - - 41;7-.:-.. •: - •-. •. ' --_ -.. rla:dami 1.:-.•APRIL...OP T . 4/t`F... .:91•OCCODE tZrotC-1- 7;*' 110;' 12 `4.ANNuAL 4:11pe;.34•:.•{Se.,Re, 4::23-05 :-' ':::-7 --9 0 07-:- 41 S 5 D.4 -.23 -0 5 -:;_-_-o.!•s iiki: twe beu 738-;39 -F-T-•::OF-. :74 :3;131-4 . FT OF -E 133-.28.- FT :-.-OF :.NW 1/11 LESS- .N • - .•_ ,- - i . F12-7 IT- OF fE-5 55-114 FT LESS - POR- - • - - - - r-1.1iLY.-0 F.:.12 OTH.:PL.- ...SE• g . NLY Fi•-•1;:•q-:.-- F...-97TH :ST 71.:ESS. C0'.-RD --_ . . - - e,•..7.,-; -•:----;.-.".-!ki:•-"4.:.-----_-:=."- :- ,•••••:-...--..---:-•-.- .. ........_•,..- . ••-.-.-_--. _... 1 1 SE. `3 ST 1 4,„,s .1 11 I 1 I 1 ti stilt 1 I W E.9:-. gT w L I I • i lea®Sill© Q 1 / • I s.E9. 9• 3s. 1 oRAILa wa . • S_E' 1OpT.. 1 / / 1 MC • - Nii t wisi immi MI Agri --Iji Wi > 1/ s- 6UE3-iFC..'T 0 o t r 15 ST 17 PROPe7 RI'Le 000 moot ism,. A .6 .6 ., I 00° -WI" -t° r VAN 4,,, A) 7 es ,.11.„& 14600110,,,, , ___.. .. Teri te1Wil _leirmr.1 • ‘ • fill - EMI n _ Ogg r- I 'IVAIII TIM NI z d® / .t • •; tad7z rom_,„Aite, lu a a. Q. i .- IF. I dliMkiilltiP 4 eO ` c 2 ELT T. r t 7 • Q3 35 L F 6 a1 , - - - I'- 7 k 31 1 1 44*. , .. . 2 1 • 4 - i Q •/ A[MARY w z 1 t i 1 . SCHOOL d Si. 1 EA1E. . I 11_1/.. NORTH I 1 Z .E. 17 r* 4 i l HIGNL ANDS . I 6,PARK 5 f 2 „ .. , ;:: PIV 1 1 I PO/ - -r 1 _ _ _, ; ' 4tillig ---_. , , 43. T I I = nifkik 9 J 411 LAI N.E. I 2TM 5T. I 7 cc 3 -^ I O 1 1 gj __, L 4 , L_______ s N.E.15 T", PI__ 3 mi. e3 W NI ` II L a I Z ,'c 1 1 I [TY OF RENTO .. _. FILE NO 4- o -,r U Es czi " BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT CF `0%`'-jrr MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME G-1 Honey Creek Associates Q R_1 FEES ADDRESS I ""! REZONE*(FROM G-1 TO R-2 ) $785.00 5611 - 119th S.E. , Suite #2 O SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP ED TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, WA 98006 CD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL 206; 746-6454 CD GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON r--1 VARIANCE From Section: NAME Justification Required a vo Thomas A. Johnson, AIA ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Renton, WA 98055 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 206 271-7200 El WAIVER Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Honev Creek Associates ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 5611 - 119th S. E. , Suite #2 Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP ED FINAL Bellevue, WA 98006 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 206 746-6454 0 Residential I ! Industrial El Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRE.3SA portion of the NW 1/4, Sec. 4, ED T 23 N, ROE, W.P . TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY ED FINAL Uncle/eloped G PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Multi-family condominium development NUMBER OF SPACES: 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES AREA: 2,112,660 1 48.5 TOTAL FEES 135.00 ri-w, G,-: pr.isr i' STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATES 1E3 I 1 ' i 141 APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ff APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: a1 JAN 27 1984 Q Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: PAJILI.`iN(.1.:.1NG DEP1 . Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: I _ 3 I Accepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: Initials) ROUTED TO: ElBuilding c25 Design Eng. CS Fire It Parks EiPolice Policy Dev. El Traffic Eng. El Utilities 1 RFVISION 5/1aR9 t Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). See attachment "B" AFFIDAVIT 1, Bob Tomberg and Mick Santa being duly sworn, declare that I am reauthorized representative to act for the property owner, owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASJINGTON,RESIDING AT Na e of Notary Public)Si re yner) 501 I — I iVth Address) Address) V y,.v 13e,1 I eV I,c 2 WA q6 CD(apr I City) State) (Zip) Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 attachment 'B' i A..• • SEE REVERSE S'DE 3 KCAL' t5 I A 1 L. 1 AX S I A i t•M I N I - NUMBER A••‘.%‘ KING OUNTY,--STATE OF WASHINGTON I15=1022.-.01.. •. ' . Stizie Scr:cOlSuppon v 1.ral Schee!Sup n V t I F"1 I Fa.r ' - ts:..--...m.Watt! t • tPAATSWINPAYING 1N PEtiSON. - i.t+ra y I ii.nertr-:is'A Svc coefat?_.;.+nsr..--, NTA HICK C yN32-23Le,__,-:..:E:frI; 1414 :ISS-PINE :L-K ---RD _--SE r..s 1.„.1 ...rst.r SAQIJAH-.IWA . 98027. - r>;..t..-.i.., !Mil=s x ocK—i:NNi)AI a.:,.e:::!: Sri : H. t=23- 15 . - • -9022 =415 5:-4O 4 .23 05 3_,,3: r•rC 3;• /i O.F. NW -1/4 LESS. POR -L"Y: N OF =:u=:.t::u:.oc;:^Rs I.BEG O-N :E -LN .OF -NW•=1Y.4 31 ..4- FT S OF- ITS :.NE: C.O I? TN .:W TO ON-'hi-L•N-`-OF- £ 132>.-OF: N 1!...I.-ill - 32 ?FT. S. -VF.:.1TS;-Nld-- COR-:-LESS ETC E`'R VCRS+ S!O 198' NUMBER V 05-.90077'08 - `C V. -. _. ... ;cc., • `Statcs%< V-<- • -:. > •• i.,-, '.,.. 1._vvp=n vv .. No,... .- .- %.,... ,, - - ..._,... .,_--,...-., upp:,..., C . V •- - - _ fry- r _ - -- cr--.-e,Lk. W .-ie.. - L •-ARTSWRENPAYING INPERSbN.. .:- _ - it•: ' . Spc- A cosmert NTA :! ICK--{ - 7.N1989Te-LCJHREN:Tlx 44. 3SS AQUAH-PJNE.'LAKE;..RD=S-E •• -- -:fn., nzll_rnrl a SAOWAH =k!A e. :. 98027 - - - r i--tip: _Pa sue-. 81ACICcDDEUSEC'TWP :RD. 12 =F''INI AL y I:,n pe:a -(See Re, 23-05- K,' • 9007•: .415 5 IJ -a -its ;::::a:J h : WI bru 738-L9 -F-T• OF••'N 1131-H ..FT. OF -E Rcen:n-:F,OCTOBe 11-28.•11 =:OFL=.Nii :1/4 -LES S- -N - - --• - - ._=:;` a•.0 :r.:: 2-7 FT- OF 'E-555-I i FT •• LESS . POR- - - .' I,ILY.=0F.:1,20TH.PL::SE- 8 . NLY F,--- 1':'=- 97TH :S7 "LESS. C0-:RD : REZONE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY JANUARY, 1984 The 48.5 acre Santa/Tomberg site is located adjacent to 120th Place Southeast Devils Elbow), approximately one mile east of the I-405 Kenneydale Interchange N.E. 30th Street). The hilly site is covered with dense stands of native vegetation and is bisected by Honey Creek. The property as it exists is presently undeveloped. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan dated June, 1983 has assigned three land use classifications to the Santa/Tomberg Property: G-1, R-1 and R-2. The G-1 designation (greenbelt) covers the largest land area on the site encompassing the vegetated ravines and the Honey Creek corridor. Two natural features which exist on the Santa/Tomberg site, (slopes that average more than 25% (56%) and the Honey Creek stream corridor) are both identified in the "Greenbelt Policies" section of the Comprehensive Plan as areas for greenbelt" designation. A small portion (5 acres) in the southwest corner of the site has been designated R- 2 or Low Density Multi-Family. The existing development adjacent to the southern property line is also an R-2 zone. The proposed zoning for the Santa/Tomberg site is consistent with this land use classification. The remainder of the Santa/Tomberg property has been designated R-1 or Single Family Residential on the Comprehensive Plan. This includes the southwestern and northeastern portions of the site. Adjacent offsite developments are also R-1 residential neighborhoods. The proposed zoning designations on this site are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use classifications for these locations. UTILITIES Sanitary Sewer Sanitary Sewer service for the site will be provided by a sanitary sewer main that is not currently installed but is expected to be in place by Fall 1984. This sewer main will be placed along the Honey Creek bed and is known as the "Honey Creek Interceptor." This location will provide convenient access for sewer to both sides of the creek. Water Mains The existing City of Renton water main system provides for potential connections on 3 sides of this site. Existing mains that adjoin the site and their locations are as follows: 1 t tr + 1-. 1 E. 9G sTi 1 1- pi 0. . It .d 1 tOsiiiii$ • .. I 1 ft kit 1 1 1 • • 1 1\: I 1 .. iffi, 40 1 1 5 uitir.. n: „..:. ,s-r. tx;di 1 4 4 IMARINEM gra - -i , :I._ - 15101111 5.E.• -3•••••5-i-.• . .. 5, .- 1 . . / 1 /1 1 -('' MINI NV Ili ...It' .ii // E: topT.5. gill,30,01 Iiies= T_ ' 1 ' / • mr . r VS NI WWII r. wi,i 1 / 4 . 3 I SuBJEGT 1s t IlisPROQQ` I 7 110110 rff: • mem - v i solo owe*-wmfori- 4 A .- wiz - jai itterireor WI - IMNI41Iri Val WS s- VA. -urn I rill°VIA F. 5T. n F VII 4 I111 k 1) s It 2 v. I T4soIJO/ e! r 1 QQ / K 21 IICREST v 1 yiENTARY q w s I i•1 CHOOL z b Sz I I ig 1 NORTHLA I l__ HIGHLANDS I I 1 , Q I Z , , 4$ I t ci' 6 PARK z 2 ... •-, t TAvit*# it d ,. 13_ f ,i F. RTM 57- ,pA , _ ii1K 5. ST. I1w.t. I5D od _til ills! .Ili 1 ' sa E.4 4 3 ElME N.E IS•", PL. 3' f I I I Ali! . ti SIZE LOCATION DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE 8" N.E. 27 Street 800 Feet. West of Devils elbow) 8" S.E. 100th Street Adjacent to Property 8" Intersection Jefferson Adjacent to Property and Harrington Water pressure for domestic service will not be a problem for this site. Adequate water for fire flow also appears to be available. Water main extensions into the site may be required. A looping system may be required if full development of the site occurs. Storm Sewer All existing storm runoff currently drains into Honey Creek. Development occuring on this site may require a storm drainage and detention system prior to discharge into Honey Creek. Control of pollutants will be an important consideration for development as will control of erosion. The nature of this site dictates that precautions be taken to prevent the possibility of erosion. LAND USE ANALYSIS AND AREA ZONING Although this site has been studied for purposes of the Comprehensive Plan, it has not been specifically considered for area zoning. This is due to the fact that this site is part of an annexation petition and currently is subject to King County Building and Land Development restrictions. This P.U.D./Rezone Application will be the first opportunity for the City of Renton to consider zoning on this site. OF A'z E 4, o THE CITY OF RENTON U 40 - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 k ,,..: o a BARBARA V. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593 94' 60 SEP -"?' March 20, 1985 Mr. John L. Hendrickson Lucas, Gl, se, Sherman & Hendrickson Attorneys At Law 600 - 108.h Avenue N.E. Bellevue, Washington, 98004 Re: Honey Creek Associates Request for Reconsideration Dear Mr. Hendrickson: I have re viewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter and the reasons for not modifying the recommendation follow. The paragraphs which follow are numbered to coincide with those of your request for reconsideration. 1. The statement in the finding was based upon the applicant's representative's statement at the hearing that the density figure requested was based upon the initial calculations of the Policy Development Department. It is exerpted from the recorded testimoni at the current public hearing. It was not intended to, nor does it reflect the applicant's initial desires nor representations made at the hearings on annexation. It was primarily aimed at the telling message which was extrapolated as follows: That any determination in the matter between the Policy Department and the applicant was initial and preliminary until the public hearing on the request to rezone the property and construct a particular PUD. 2. Acquiescence on the part of the Building Department in their report cannot be separated from the rest of the "Preliminary Report To The Hearing Examiner." The underlined phrase in the previous sentence is the title of the report this office receives and emphasizes the nature of the recommendations it contains - preliminary. It is obvious from the record that the hearing was continued to allow that Department time to try to reconstruct the methodology used to arrive at the density figure now urged by the applicant. The report indicates that the department believed the calculations were erroneous, but that the department felt obligated to follow them. Reasoning similar to that indicated in Paragraph 1, above, must prevail. The analysis was a preliminary recommendation: the department indicated that they thought the Policy analysis was erroneous and left the final determination to this office. 3. The decision of this office eliminates any possible uncertainty. Further, this office maintains that there is no reason to allude to an 'interpretation' as the language is quite clear that the entire lot is the basis for the determination. The applicant's reasoning again opens the issue previously stated: Where would one begin determining that the slope was in excess of 15%? On a site as steep as the subject site, measurements between almost an/ two non-adjacent contour lines could result in a 15% slope. ObvLously, the "entire lot" application results in both the steep slope areas and the non-steep slope areas being treated in a like manner. The intended effect of the PUD Ordinance is to treat the entire lot as one for purposes of determining density. If it were not for this like treatment, clustered 'apartment-like' development would not be permissatle on parcels with single family zoning. 4. Whi, e the City may have mandated development of less than 260 units before even considering the applicant's request, as has been previously stated, those agreements were preliminary and subject to review at a public hearing at which both the Hearing Examiner, and ultimately the City Council, would sit in judgment. c) While the consistency in interpretation urged by the applicant is all well and good, if that interpretation is not sound, it should not be followed after the mistake is identified. 5. Wh le the formula may not be the simplest. the language lends itself to easy usage by the sI illed professional. If the applicant can persuade this office that the language of the Uniform Building Code which contains structural and stress analysis formulas or those formulas related to flow through pipes and sewers utilized by Engineering are easier to apply, this office might be convinced. A simple tracing by an accurate hand with a planimeter of all the contour lines of the entire lot (while arduous or tedious appears easier than calculating roof truss angles), would provide consistent results each time the method 'vas applied to the same lot. The applicant's methodology. and that erroneously applied t y the Policy Development Department requires the same methodology but only to a lesser extent (fewer contour lines must be measured) and applied to only those slopes over 15%. But then those 15% slopes still have to be determined by someone arbitrarily fixing scme point on the lot to start measuring for a 15% slope. That method could not be reproduced exactly, while the formula applied to the entire lot can be. 6. Since there does not appear to be any ambiguity, only a mistaken reading, issues concerning the derogation of the common law would appear to be inapplicable. This office is the agency particularly charged with determining the final construction of the specific ordinance in question and would be ignoring the plain reading of the Ordinance if any other interpretation were permitted. It would be difficult to view the decrease in density as a deprivation of development rights o~ other property rights since the property lies outside of this jurisdication, and the applicant is free to develop the property under the provisions applicable in King County, whatever they may be. The code is clear, while it was incorrectly read or interpreted by staff at one time, that does not mean it cannot be given a clear reading now or in the future. The phrase "entire lot" means just that. Severe slopes are at issue and development compromises have to be made. In this case the Ordinance allows shifting density from steep slopes to more gentle slopes, therefore, the average across the entire lot. t I While this office has determined that the formula should be applied to the entire slope, this office sees no reason to recommend to the City Council that the Ordinance be modifies':. While the applicant may find fault with its result, that does not mean that the Ordinance is incorrect. The Ordinance appears to reasonably implement policy guiding development on steep slopes, and while the applicant may prefer other methods, that does not make the current formula invalid. The applicant is free to urge modification based upon some policy grounds but the allegation that the existing Policy is incorrect is itself incorrect. To conclude that the reading of the Ordinance by this office deprives the applicant of due process or constitutional rights flies in the face of the facts surrounding this matter. The applicant is in a more favorable position than most. If the application of the codes in Renton are unfavorable, the applicant has only to develop under the guidelines of King County. Further, the applicant should surely realize that since the City Council has to review the separate annexation petition, that any development plans they may have ha are entirely tentative, preliminary and conditional. Would ,he applicant claim that th " ' Council cannot deny annexation at this stage because the applicant relied on a year and one half of negotiation? As the City Council is charged with reviewing the annexation, this office is charged with reviewing applications for PUDs. The applicant has not shown that the provision averaging slope across the lot is unreasonable and there is, therefore, no reason to modify the recommendation. The appeal period is accordingly extended to April 3, 1985. If this office can be of any further assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely," Z_.-Qa...‘<a4---i,i,...___ FRED ]. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Greg Diener Bob Tomberg Lorraine Damman Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Oyler Kathleen Gormley Mitch Murray Mel Easter Parties of Record (City Staff) LUCAS, GLASE, SHERMAN 8 HENDRICKSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW CURT D. BLAKE HONEYWELL CENTER PETER J. GLASE SUITE 505 JOHN L. HENDRICKSON 600 - I08TH AVENUE N.E. PETER J. LUCAS BELLEVUE, WA 98004 MERRILEE A MACLEAN DENNIS J. MCLERRAN JOHN A. SEETHOFF" March 18, 1985 JAMES D. SHERMAN 206) 453-0300 WASHINGTON AND CALIFORNIA BARS Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Office of the Hearing Examiner 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Honey Creek Associates/R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Kaufman: This office represents the Honey Creek Associates, the applicant with regard to the above-referenced proposed rezoning and Preliminary Plan Unit Development (PPUD). The applicant respectfully requests that the Examiner reconsider the Report and Recommendation regarding this matter issued on March 4, 1985. It is the position of the applicant that the aforementioned report and recommendation includes errors of fact and law in the findings and conclusions contained therein. In this regard, the Examiner is requested to take into consideration the following points: 1. Initial Density Calculations. It is incorrectly stated at Finding 19 that preliminary discussions and initial density calculations concluded in the proposed 185 dwelling units. Actually the initial discussions and calculations with City officials regarding this proposal included 260 dwelling units. This fact is referenced in the comments of Mr. David R. Clemens, Policy Development Director, in the March 5, 1984 minutes of the Renton City Council meeting, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Subsequent to that Council meeting, and as a result of discussions with City officials, the applicant reduced the total number of dwelling units to 185. This is reflected in the applicant's March 8, 1984 letter to Mr. Roger J. Blaylock, (Exhibit "B"). 2. Building and Zoning Density Acquienscence. Mr. Blaylock, in behalf of the Building and Zoning Department, in his letter dated March 21, 1984 (Exhibit "C") acknowledged the revised density and commented that this change was a step in the "right direction". No reference is made therein to any allegation regarding improper density. The proposed density of 185 units was again acknowledged and acquiesed to by both the Policy Development Department and the Building and Zoning Department in the final Declaration of Non-significance issued on June 18, 1984 (Exhibit "D"). 3. Predictability of Interpretation. It is asserted in Conclusion 10 that the interpretation of City officials regarding the slope formula in Section 4-2709(4)(B)(2) would introduce uncertainty. However, a specific threshold of slope percentage has been used in this instance in applying the slope formula. The formula was applied to all slopes in excess of fifteen percent. Consequently the formula was applied in a consistent and predictable Mr. Fred J. Kaufman March 18, 1985 Page Two fashion to all steep slope areas. This is consistent with the intent of the Code. On the other hand, the application of the formula on an "entire lot" basis would not be consistent with the intent of the code. This would result in a reduction of the allowed density on non-steep slope areas. The non-steep slope areas are to be developed in a manner consistent only with the zoning density restictions. "Entire lot" application of the formula results in the treatment of the non-steep slope and steep slope areas in the same manner without recognizing the significant difference in slopes and the differing potentials for development. 4. Consistent City Interpretation. The application of the formula to the steep slope areas in this case was not urged by the applicant, as is referenced in Conclusion 10, but was rather mandated by City officials. As is referenced above, the applicant has previously reduced the density from 260 units, at the urging of the City. Throughout the nearly one and one-half years that this proposal has been considered by the City of Renton, City officials have consistently applied the slope formula to steep slopes. Only in the last sixty days have certain officials changed their interpretation and proposed the "entire lot" method of interpretation. 5. Ambiguity of Ordinance. It is apparent that all parties might agree that the slope formula is difficult to interpret and to apply. The formula appears to include inherent ambiguity which fosters different interpretations by extremely competent and professional persons, both within the City and by private professional parties. It is evident therefore that the Code section in question not only warrants revision but such revision may be require i by law. This Code section has a very significant and direct impact on the ability of land owners to use their land. In this instance it has been applied to reduce the density of development from the originally proposed 260 dwelling units to approximately 90 dwelling units on 47.7 acres. Obviously this results in an extremely low density of development and to the point of effectively removing the economic feasibility of developing this property. Where a Code section is applied with such a devestating effect on private property rights, the City must be certain that it is applying the Code section in a fair and non-arbitrary manner. It must also be able to conclude that it is applying the Code in a manner consistent with its intent. As stated by the court in Stastny v. Board of Trustees, 32 Wn. App. 239, 647 P.2d 496 (1982), Any statute, including a rule or regulation of an administrative agency, which forbids an act in terms so vague persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application, violates the first essential of due process of law. This principal requires the statute provide explicit standards to prevent arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement." (Citations omitted.) In this instance, it is evident that the significant difference in the minds of City officials as to the application of the Code section in question raises a question as to the consitutionality of the provision. Mr. Fred J. Kaufman March :.8, 1985 Page Three 6. Administrative Construction. It is a well-established principle in law in this state aid country "that zoning ordinances are in derogation of the common law right of an owner 10 use private property so as to realize its highest utility. Such ordinances must be strictly construed in favor of property owners and should not be extended by implication to cases not clearly within their scope and purpose." Morin v. Johnson, 49 Wn.2d 275 (1956). Consequently, the Code section in question should be interpreted in a manner that is consistent with the rights of the applicant to use the property to the fullest extent possible. The applicant has complied with requests to reduce the density to 185 dwelling units in recognition of the City's application of the slope formula. H here there is difficulty in interpreting or applying a specific ordinance, judicial officials give great weight to the construction of such ordinances by the officials charged with their enforcement. Morin, supra. In this instance the City officials have applied the slope formula to the steep slope areas from its outset. The Examiner should similarly give great weight to the interpretation made by the City officials who are involved in its enforcement. No recognition should be given to the fact that some officials have at the last minute changed their interpretation. To recognize such "flip-flopping" would lead to the type cf arbitrary and discriminatory application of the laws which the courts find objectionable. In summary, the applicant requests that the Examiner reconsider the March 4, 1985 report and recommendation, with a specific focus on the application of the slope formula to this praposal. The interpretation of the formula as applied throughout this case provides predictability and certainty and is consistent with the intent of steep slope restrictions. To conclude otherwise, is inconsistent with the construction applied by the City officials in the nearly one and one-half years that this matter has been under review. In the event the Examiner determines that the slope formula should be applied on an entire lot basis, remedial legislation should be proposed to the City Council in order that the provision can be changed through proper legislative channels. However, to alter its meaning in "mid- stream" with regard to this application runs contrary to the applicant's rights to due process and equal protection under the laws. I': is requested that a supplemental hearing be established in order that the foregoing and other points may be more thoroughly discussed. Thank you for your consideration of the foregoing points. Very truly yours, IU ; S,S SHERM N & HENDRICKSON Q Jo n L. Hendrickson At,orneys for Honey Creek Associates JLH:cb cc: Honey Creek Associates ohnson Braund Design Group RECEIVED MAR 18 1985 CITY ROF RENTON 4' RENTON CITY COUNCIL EXHIBIT_A---._ Regular Meeting March 5, 19E4 MunicipalBuildingMonday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance totheflagandcalledthemeetingoftheRentonCityCounciltoorder. ROLL CALL OF ROBERT J. HUGHES, Council President; EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W.COUNCIL MEMBERS TRIMM, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, RICHARD M. STREDICKE,KATHY A. KEOLKER. CITY STAFF lq BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney;ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant ; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; DAVID R. CLEMENS, Policy Development Director; ROBERT BERGSTROM, Engineering Supervisor; CHIEF LEE WHEELER, Fire Department; CAPTAIN JAMES BOURASA, Police Department. PRESS Pat Jenkins, Renton Record-Chronicle MINUTE APPRO\ AL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, PAGE SIX, PARAGRAPHONE, LAST LINE, WORDS "THE PREVIOUS" BE REPLACED BY "A PRIOR." CARRIED. . MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCILADOPTTHEMINUTESOFFEBRUARY27, 1984 AS AMENDED. CARRIED. PUBLIC MEETIPG This being the date set and proper notices having beenpostedHoneyCreekandpublishedaccordingtolaw, Mayor Shinpoch opened thepublicAnnexation meeting to consider the Honey Creek Associates 10% Letterof10% Letter of Intent to annex a*116-acreIntent parcel located north and eastofNE27thStreet (Devil ' s Elbow area) . Letter from City Clerk was read advising certification by the Policy DevelopmentDepartmentthatsignaturesonthe10% Letter of Intent represent 35% oftheassessedvaluationwithintheproposedannexingarea. Letter also states Council responsibility to determine whether to accept the Letter of Intent; require the applicant to affirm adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and pre- - existing bonded indebtedness; and authorize circulation ofthe75% Petition. *Corrected figure. Continued Policy Development Director David R. Clemens explained concurrent review of rezone, planned unit development & annexation has been requested for Council approval in accordance with new procedures. Utilizing a display map, Mr. Clemens outlined boundaries of the proposal : Area A, approximately 54 acres, former gravel excavation area located north of NE 20th and east of Jefferson Avenue NE; Area B, approximately 14 acres, located between NE 16th and NE 20th Street immediately east of Kirkland Avenue NE; Area C, approximately 22 acres, located between SE 100th and SE 104th Streets (Sierra Height No. 5 plat) ; and Area D, approximately26acresofprimarilyKingCountyproperty, located in the middle portion of proposed May Creek Park (between SE 93rd Street and SE 95th Way east of 116th Avenue SE) . Of the entire annexation area, rezone and PUD approval are being sought on only 48 acresofAreaA, and Council clarification is requested of whether a PUD can be included in the simultaneous review process. Continued Mr. Clemens reiterated staff comments as follows: Building & Zoning Department supported inclusion of property between the annexing area and Union Avenue NE for access purposes; Parks Department suggested additional park land and open space areas be required; Finance Department indicated that the annexation will Improve feasibility of Honey Creek Sewer Interceptor construction with additional contributions from new residents; Public Works Department Indicated that annexation represents a logical extension of utilities; Police and Fire Departments expressed -considerable concern regarding public safety service to the annexing area due to steep topography and poor access roads. Additional staffing would be required to serve the area for which 60 new single family homes and 200 multiple family units are proposed if all approvals are granted. Continued Based upon other staff comments, the recommendation ofthePolicyDevelopmentDepartmentwasreportedasfollows: 1 ) the 4 Renton City Council EXHIBITA3!5/84 Paste twoo Public Meeting continued Honey Creek City Council should approve consideration of a PUD application Annexation for the portion of Area A proposed for rezone; and 2) the City 10% Letter of Council should find that public safety issues related to Areas Intent continued C and D require further review by the Committee of the Whole. Therefore, the 75% petition application for the annexation should proceed only for Areas A and B. Continued Audience comment: Curtis J. Martin, 3728 Park Avenue N. ; Roger Green, 9818 124th Avenue SE; Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE #2, Bellevue; Pat Sado, 9902 126th Avenue SE; Mr. Visick, 12405 SE 98th St. ; Chuck Youngquist , 12110 SE 96th; Mick Santa, 4444 Issaquah-Pine Lake Road, Issaquah; Russel Bergeron, 2807 NE 21st Street. Concerns included use of the proposed area for dumping purposes (wrecked autos, appliances) and responsibility for clean-up; narrow access roads in the area, specifically, Devil ' s Elbow Road, SE 100th and SE 104th Streets, which are substandard; maintenance of greenbelt areas; protection of Honey Creek; need for trunk line extension in area because lots will not percolate for septic systems; and assurance of adequate fire and police protection. Dr. Tomberg, representing Honey Creek Associates, owners of Area A, indicated extension of the trunk line will occur with or without the development, and annexation will increase the tax base and defer costs of trunk line installation; the area is now used by motorcyclists and for dumping purposes; the proposed development will be clustered on approximately 12 acres of the 48-acre site, and located well away from environmentally-sensitive Honey Creek; greenbelts will be maintained and debris removed; access is proposed to the east and south of the west side of Honey Creek to avoid adverse impact to the existing road systems; U.S. Geology maps show no coal mines in the area but that will be investigated prior to development; police and fire protection and response time will be greatly improved when responsibility is transferred from King County to City of Renton. Dr. Tomberg requested approval of the request for simultaneous review of the annexation. rezone and PUD applications; however, he noted that no firm -development plans have been submitted at this stage. Continued Mr. Clemens explained the City' s rationale for including all four parcels in the original annexation proposal as a logical extension of City boundaries; however, evidence of potential development problems and hazards have changed the departmental recommendation to include only two parcels. Responding to inquiry regarding whether review by Committee of the Whole of certain public safety issues related to Areas C and D of the annexation area would obviate the Council ' s objectivity in considering the entire matter, City Attorney Warren advised that the Council would be making a policy determination, which is permissible. Mr. Clemens indicated that the applicant has agreed to accept the three stipulations in accordance with State law to proceed with annexation (City zoning, Comprehensive Plan, and bonded indebtedness) . Since all property owners in Areas A and B support the annexation, the 75% petition requirements can be satisfied if the Council reduces the scope of the proposal . Annexation of other areas may be pursued on a case-by-case basis. Continued Fire Chief Lee Wheeler clarified that with current staffing, the Fire Department can adequately serve Area B and the westerly portion of Area B; however, concern exists in serving Areas C. D and the easterly portion of Area A. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC MEETING TO MARCH 19, 1984. CARRIED. Mr. Clemens agreed to provide a synopsis of development options allowed by the Comprehensive Plan for the area; analysis of access routes to serve development; costs to extend fire and police service to specific areas; costs incurred by King County to maintain Devil ' s Elbow Road in the past. A field trip to the area was also proposed. AUDIENCE COMMENT Nick Petruska, 1174 Shelton NE, requested advancement to the Advance to Planning and Development Committee report regarding the Dalpay/ Old Business Crookston Rezone appeal . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, Dalpay/Crookston COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO Rezone Appeal OLD BUSINESS, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Honer Creek Associates BOB OMBERG. D.D.S. 5611 119rH S. E. BELLEVUE. WASH. 95006 746-6554 March 8, 1984 Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator Municipal Building fl' ' South l.'. 90055 Dear Please accept this letter as confirmation of our intention to modify our PUD ai olicati:.n subsequent to your initial thresnco].d determination. The changes are as follows: 1 . Redistribute 1CY) units to the west side of the creek leaving 85 units on the est. 2. • Development to begin imrr,ed_atl y following approval by the City of Renton an the west side of Honey Creek. 3. Development on the east side of Honey Creek shall begin within 5 years of approval of this PUD or when the City of Renton notifies us it can service that side (whichever is first) . Approval of the east side shall be in general terms which may require revision at the time of development. We will provide more detailed drawings of our intentions following revision of your threshold determination in light of our modifications. We do not believe an Environmental Impact ,Statement should be required because 1 . ) we are only asking for 100 residential units at this time 2. ) there will be little or no alteration to plant life as we will be constructing on the site of the old gravel pit where only a few alders and fir trees have volunteered following cessation of excavation 3. )we will not be in or near Honey Creek except to provide nature trails for public recreation 4. )we have yeilded to your desire to not devel y. the east side therefore not adversly impacting any city services or community traffic patterns, EXHIBIT 11, -11°: 5, , gs.. Your ongoing co-operation is deeply appreciated.r-r fl Sincerely„- i/ iw 2- e" / , s,.• . 4.-.1....- L'. Bob '11c5/mberg 41;1HoneyCreekAssociates cc: Dave Clements A . ' ' z0 5. . . ••• :_iyfis 44,- i. . . • . ' 'C1..3., i-4; 34,-r:- 1.. 1..---.....- a,, Its 4 1 EXHIBIT 6 A q a_ ‘• i— 1 1 OF RE+ 44 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT tb .) RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z oil/ ci p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 c. 094, SE:TE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR March 21, 1984 Mr. Bob - omberg, D.D.S. 5611 - 119th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 SUBJEC1 : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES - Rezone & Preliminary PUD File R-014-84; PPUD-015-84; ECF-014-84 Dear Mr. Tomberg: The Renton Environmental Review Committee is in receipt of your letter dated March 8, 1984, stating your confirmation to modify the above referenced PUD application as recommended by our committee. As we seated in our letter of March 1, 1984, that because the project is functionally divided by the ravine, greater environmental impacts are of great concern for the northeast portion of the site in respect to distance and response time for police and fire services. By limiting development at this time to the southwest corner of the site, we feel that you are approaching this situation in the right direction. In order for the committee to make its final environmental determination, we are requesting that you notify your architect to prepare a revised site plan detailing your intentions. The plan should also incorporate a concern we had addressed for secondary access to the southwest portion of the site. This was detailed in our letter of March 1. Please submit four prints of this revised site plan, along with any other pertinent information, to the Building & Zoning Department at your earliest convenience so that an environmental declaration can be made. Until this is accomplished, the application will remain on our agenda under Pending Business. For the Environmental Review Committee: Roger J. Bla lock Zoning Administrator RJB:JFL:se:0760Z cc: T iomas A. Johnson, AIA Johnson Braund Design Group 31)4 Main Street S., Suite 400 Renton, WA 96055 EXR!T C FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): R-014-64, PPUD-015-84 Environmental Checklist No.: ECF-014-84 Description of Proposal: Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, and R-2 and for.approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium development having 185 housing units. This revised application is to be constructed in two phases. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek. Proponent: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal: Property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on February 8, April 25, June 13, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, David Clemens, Ronald Nelson, James Matthew, Roger Blaylock, Robert Bergstrom, James Hanson, James Bourasa, Gene Williams, and Jerry Lind Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-014-84 are the following: 1.Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Bob Tomberg and Mick C. Santa, dated January 11, 1984. 2.Applications: R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84; revised plans/received April 16, 1984. 3. F.ecommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Parks and Recreation Department, Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a .significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2Xc). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1.1 he project has been reduced in scale from 185 units to 99 units all located on the south side of Honey Creek. 2.Secondary emergency access will be provided south from the subject site to either N:irkkand Place N.E. or N.E. 18th Street. a SIGNATURES: 044- onald C. Nelson David R. L. e ens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ric and C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: June 18. 1984 APPEAL DATE: July 2, 1984 EXHIBIT P RECEIVED MAR 181985 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 1307Z CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 19, 1985 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING jc The appwications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING OF JANUARY 15, 1985. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Applications for Joint Land Use actions to: Rezone 47.7 acres of property from G- 1, General, to R- 1, Residential - Single Family, and R- 2, Residential - Two Family, file R- 014- 84. 2) Approval of a Preliminary P.U.D. for a two-phase multi-family development consisting of 185 dwelling units, file PPUD- 015- 85. The first phase of the P.U.D., located on the south side of Honey Creek, will consist of 99 dwelling units. Property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. 011 IN\ \ J f' 1A ta Z, 41 5 NG t- E sit-\ Ives) N Ac fce- L.) GFkM 1 4, s, pc a r4S) I 4 LQc La, w Ly Cir. c1 A c 1 z. psrs rry vt" PA/ 1. 11 tk ct 01- tk L- 4r 17FeL- 45 ri. ptie\ um(Aj 4 z 1 fit 1 b'47 z d) b•o g)t S3-Jz>b a' 1NJh 4 tHif i 4 a a ) 1 042-1.., ilea I 9l 1 n.421'' i-A1-a•„L 1.s}ra-T. Lc 4. 3 N0 c 6)• 41 1 sa en cam S • o2 c. ,eo ••fp 041 11I5,.-, 0 •, q 1 -'-4 1 'L n ' I t 9 "L '3V/ zS 47• 6z 0 1 -I Z t i 1 Z '.. 5' ' a• /S1-1 s• c) S I-?! b . ooi- 0 ' •z , Z. .2. i. cli/zs_ b.47 v z-y 1- v r104 21,?, 3A0 S So-ov V 3 aAd 3 NoZ. SW Al t'1 7 a+"V o c Cc-2 10 3/-+S 4t sos 3A4 t."'"....."." i . 1 i 5 C .. t Ii I'.'.'".;. f' i •,,,,,. i rrt n ' i t f . 4 ' I i•.- i 1 t • x 1 Vil ' 1 14. ji • e 3 V4 t iii 1 1 411••.••••••. ft t 4. f i 1 t f 156ta 12" e.,........... ........ min..,„........................ m..................... 97‘. 1134 . iiI 1 I e„—;,, •••;'. 1. 3,--> -, y 4 11 I- 4 - it •. , r . 1 t 7 5 1 1 P CITY OF RENTON I 1) JAPJ 27 1984 SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Prepared for JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP Y. S. , INC. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 1126 108th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, Washington 98004 January 10, 1984 Project Description The Santa/Tomberg property is located in unincorporated King County adjacent to 120th P1. S. E. , approximately one mile east of the I-405 Kennydale Interchange (N. E. 30th Street ) . The hiLly property is bisected by Honey Creek, and is presently unimproved. The property is bounded on the west and south by the Renton City Limits. The proposed action includes annexation of the property to the City of Renton. A Planned Unit Development (P. U. D. ) consisting of 185 multifamily residential units is proposed for the Santa/Tomberg Property. Because the site is bisected by the steep Honey Creek ravine, the P. U. D. would be constructed as two geographically separate areas, on either side of the ravine. Pedestrian recreational paths may link the two areas, but no direct vehicular links are proposed. Each area would have its own parking, tennis court, tot lot, and swimming pool for use by residents and their guests only. The northeast area of the site would have 112 multifamily residential units (80 two story stacked flat units and 32 townhouse units ) and approximately 175 parking stalls. Vehicular access would be via an extension of 122nd Avenue S. E. , which presently intersects S. E. 95th Way. The southwest area of the site would have 73 multifami' y residential units (60 two story stacked flat units and 13 townhouse units ) and approximately 118 parking stalls. Vehicular access would be via extensions of Jefferson Avenue N. E. to the north, and N. E. 21st Street to the east, which would intersect within the site. 1 Existing Conditions The attached figures show the street network in northeast Renton and the vicinity of the Santa/Tomberg site. Freeway access is via the I-405 Kennydale Interchange (N. E. 30th Street ) and the I-405 North Renton Interchange (N. E. Park Dr. ) . The City of Renton Arterial Street Map shows the N. E. Park Drive - N. E. Sunset Blvd. route as a major arterial. The N. E. 30th Street - Kennewick P1. N.E. - N. E. 27th Street - Edmonds Avenue N.E. route is a secondary arterial, as is Union Avenue Northeast. N.E. 12th Street is a collector arterial . The King County Interim Transportation Plan: Focus 1990 shows Coal Creek Parkway S. E. 136th Avenue S. E. ) as a major arterial. The S. E. 95th Way -. 120th P1. S. E. route and 132nd Avenue S. E. are shown as collector arterials. There are no designated arterials within the area bounded by Edmonds Avenue N.E. , the S. E. 27th Street - 120th P1. S. E. - S. E. 95th Way route, Union Avenue N.E. (132nd Avenue S. E. ) , N. E. Sunset Blvd. , and N. E. 12th Street.The Santa/Tomberg property is close to the middle of this area, which measures one mile from Edmonds Avenue N. E. to Union Avenue N. E. , and nearly one mile from N. E. Sunset Blvd. to S. E. 95th Way. The streets in the area generally have two lanes, with the exception of the four-lane N.E. Park Drive - N. E. Sunset Blvd. Route. Traffic control signals are located on this route at the I-405 freeway ramps, Sunset Blvd. N. E. , Edmonds Avenue N. E. , Harrington Avenue N. E. , N. E. 10th Street, N. E. 12th Street, Union Avenue N. E. , and Duvall Avenue N.E. 2 Figure 1 shows 1983 average weekday traffic volumes adjusted from counts taken by the City of Renton, King County, and 'I'P&E. Traffic delays and some congestion occurs at the signalized intersections on the high-volume N. I . Park Dr. - N. E. Sunset Blvd. route particularly during °the peak hours. Traffic generally flows freely on the other arterials in the area, with occasional generally brief delays experienced by motorists turning onto or crossing these arterials from side streets. Future Conditions Figure 2 shows projected 1989 average daily traffic volumes in the vicinity without the Santa/Tomberg P. U. D. These volumes are based on the 1983 AWLYP ' s and projected to 1989 assuming a 3% annual traffic volume growth rate. This is a moderate background traffic volume growth rate which is based on the assumption that traffic volume growth will be roughly in proportion to population growth in the area. This 3% rate is the annualized growth rate calculated from the 1978 and 1990 populations for the northeast Renton planning area, contained in the City of Renton Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Santa/Tomberg P. U. D. is expected to generate approximately 1480 vehicular trips on an average weekday at full occupancy. A vehicular trip is defined as "a single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or. destination (exiting or entering ) inside the study site" (Trip Generation - An Informational Report,Institute of Transportation Engineers, Third Edition, 1983 ) . This estimate is based on 185 multifamily units and a trip generation rate of 8 trips per unit. The studies conducted for the ITE report show an average rate of 7. 9 trips per unit, with a maximum of 10. 0 trips per unit and a minimum of 6. 2 trips per unit for planned unit developments. The ITE average rates indicate that approximately 150 trips (10% ) would occur during the AM peak hour, with about half leaving and half entering the Santa/Tomberg site. About 150 trips ( 10% ) would also occur during the PM peak hour , with about 85 entering and about 65 leaving the site. Approximately 900 of the average weekday trips would be generated in the northeast area of the site, with the remaining 580 daily trips generated in the southwest area of the site. 4 Figure 3 shows the estimated distribution of the P. U. D. site-generated average weekday traffic onto the street network. About 60% of the traffic generated by the southwest area of the P. U. D. is expected to use Kirkland Avenue N. E. south to N. E. 12th Street and beyond. Some traffic will use N. E. 21st Street, Harrington P1. N. E. , and N. E. 23rd Pl . (or N. E. 23rd Street ) as a short route between the site and the Kennydale Interchange, to use I-405 to the north. A smaller percentage is expected to use Harrington Avenue N. E. and N. E. 16th Street as a route to Edmonds Avenue Northeast. The primary access to the northeast area of the site will be on 122nd Avenue S. E. to S. E. 95th Way. A secondary access has , been suggested on S. E. 100th Street, connecting through to 132nd Avenue N. E. (Union Avenue N.E. ) via several residential streets. Though this access is not shown on the current Santa/Tomberg P. U. D. -site plan, it would enhance the accessibility of the northeast area of the site, and therefore has been included in this traffic analysis. It is expected that about. 40% of the northeast site area traffic would use this S. E. 100th Street route to Union Avenue N. E. , continuing on to the Renton Highlands business areas, or to Renton proper. The 60% of the northeast site area traffic using 122nd Avenue S. E. is expected to split nearly evenly to the east and to the west on S. E. 95th Way. Northbound traffic would continue on to either I-405 or Coal Creek Parkway. If access to S. E. 100th Street is not provided for the northeast site area, then all 900 trips would use 122nd Avenue Southeast. Of these it is estimated that about 350 would use S.E. 95th Way to the west, and about 550 would use S. E. 95th Way to the east. 5 Figure 4 shows projected 1989 AWDT ' s with the Santa/Tomberg P. U. D. fully occupied. The traffic volumes shown generally are the sum of the traffic volumes shown on Figures 2 and 3 . It is assumed that the northeast P. U. D. site area would have access to S. E. 100th Street. The on-site roadways would connect 122nd Avenue S.E. to S. E. 100th Street. A small amount of the existing traffic generated by the existing residential areas east of the site may use this route as a shortcut to Kennydale. The AWDT on S. E. 100th Street would probably be in the range of 400 - 500. If access is not provided to S. E. 100th Street, then the 1989 AWDT on 122nd Avenue S. E. would be approximately 1300. These projected traffic volumes on 122nd Avenue S. E. are higher than traffic volumes on most typical residential local access streets. Rather than serving as simply a residential street, 122nd Avenue S. E. would function as a neighborhood collector by helping to provide mobility from the intersecting streets to the S. E. 95th Way arterial. The 122nd Avenue S. E. roadway appears to be in good physical condition and will provide this function safely and efficiently. Since S. E. 95th Way is such a low volume arterial, its intersection with 122nd Avenue S. E. would continue to function well, with only occasional brief delays to side street traffic. The installation of stop or yield signs on S. E. 96th P1. east and west of 122nd Avenue S. E. should be considered. Traffic generated by the P. U. D. would have several impacts on the N. E. 21st Street - Harrington P1. N. E. - N. E. 23rd P1. and N. E. 23rd Street ) route. N. E. 21st Street east of Harrington P1. N. E. is presently constructed as a half-street, with a 20 ' wide pavement and curb and gutter only on the south side. This relatively short street segment will need to be widened in order to safely accomodate the increased traffic volumes due to the P. U. D. The increased traffic volumes on N. E. 23rd P1. and N.E. 23rd Street will probably not be very 6 noticeable to residents because the total volumes will still be relatively low, and well within the typical volume range on residential streets. Both of these streets have recently been improved, including new pavement and curb and gutter, so they will easily accomodate the increased volumes. Tncreased traffic volumes on Harrington P1. N. E. between N. E. 21st Street and N. E. 23rd Street may be more noticeable to residents. This street segment appears to be in fair to poor physical condition, with patchy pavement and no curb or gutter. However, the expected traffic volumes and traffic operations on Harrington P1. N.E. will still be acceptable for a residential local access street. The very sl ort seymenl. cat Jefferson Av_nue N. E. north ol: Kirkland Avenue N. E. may need some repairs to the existing pavement. Kirkland Avenue N. E. and N. E. 16th Street appear to be in reasonably good condition, and will easily accomodate the increased traffic volumes. These streets function as neighborhood collectors and will continue to do so effectively. Virtually no P. U. D. - generated traffic is expected to use Hillcrest Lane Northeast. '['his relatively narrow route which neanders through the rest home and its parking area is not really a shortcut, and its use would require an extra stop. Kirkland Avenue N. E. would be a much faster and more easily negotiated route. The P. U. D. - generated traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on the intersection of Kirkland Avenue N. E. and N. E. 12th Street. Left turning and through traffic on Kirkland Avenue N. E. experienced level of service C during the 1983 PM peak hour. Calculations for the 1989 PM peak hour indicates that this left turning or through traffic would experience level of service D with or without the P. U. D. - generated traffic. 7 0 w J 2 r-/ p . o NE KENMYD air' NE rN4itrRsTNUa° at 950 co ` s 1, "1711. : g6• It $ ,-,KENNYDALE 0 9 s 1n ELEMENTARY 0 SO O L NE 28TH ST c SCHOOL ENE 28TH ST 32 33N. 4 i0 T 24 N-12 5 E WM 33 34 N m 2 7TH 54 NE 27T • 5 4 c W • sE 96T K T 23 N-R 5 E WM 4 3 IOW OQ ST I iy • d' 4, o 4600ZCTJx ' N ti Q d 4Z Op z SE 98TN' C W O . STSE v)1ERRA HEIGHTS ri 99THWKE ONS Cl".' W _ 0 •\ p •9TH ELEMENTARY 5T r'•I`E Te W W W y7' IJOIi\ 4•• y ST SCHOOL Z 1.- Z t PARK W NE 25TH ST z a -oR! ' W z Z L S 4 NTA x SE 10.T ST NE .-t 24TH ST W H ST X x ra SE NE < 24TH STSEa01ST g C 1NE 23RD 250 PL X X X T F SE 101ST 8 i NE r 23RD ST Q i0 Ito ST i` i Li PR 0 R R Y 7, SE 102N >a CT SE Pvt)NE ISO ZO Z O t i• ST W as If, rrtNM/ . On..mm 22N D ST ' a I() `••• 700 w 10ZZp W Z NE N ( :::.. M SE 103RD S7 tiE T; 8W'' Ig=1000 z Z O oWIC 21srW ii y450or 5E H z z CO FZ< ST S 1b° 4TH ST CT I 4E 20TH ST 0_ d ZW x aZ p'-O 700 > i t Z NES20T11 T < r Oia Z I Q ta , SE 105TH0 x P 0W O W NE 20TH S7 Z Pvt-)-- U xxs", V I 1 400 Wi p x Z of. 19TH ST p' NV P IH SE' TH- STIvxNE18THHILL ST ER Et, E j8 f ` M AL l iiiZ 03< > . 44 O r o SC '' oei NE 17TH 1 r O hE (I IJ 1µAN G Q N O ZO O K 16 7 y' t e.,o.W Z ..x. r. l$ t N n t S 8naw Z NE 17TH NE 17TH ' $T SE 1(2 6QO NIGh I.AV11F > NMI il'... J r ST NE rn t 16TH U S7 W PAPA,: 15TH Q to.,.,W Z...:T 2000 W sT o z •1 - O z oiJ{ vit 2 ? 4^\ri W Z W W W W Z ‘~ NE NW *` I+4}' •i 405 Z p Z W Z Z • Ili Playground. W Z Z .y Q Z O Z W e Z• ST H>< 44. WZ W Z W WJ OI:..`;`:WW < JNE W W OOZ O>- > O > Om O S ..r! L_ = Z >Y 14THJ < < m O'McKNIGHT x ST NE 14TH0 < 0 O N NE 14TH ST j It') O t JR.HIGH N1 h Sec 13TH 0 W Reservoirs ST f t ' A W ZO Z SCHOOL N. 51 W O ST Cr.) Oh'"~ R O, Z '•• K Z I Z SE \ QUO1.Z Z W Library W J 4 122ZaNE12THni54ST <N hJ \ 0, O • • Cl.• NE I TH ST i„il thyvOf' , \ tiFJ 8 9 O A Z • NE Qv `<H e% \` R o f O 3 n Office N Qy .NE_ SANTA/ TOMBERG PROPERTY so lir PARK dE 1n Z Si. NE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NORTH RENTON O W i9 0 = H co. E INTERCHANGE a NE 0Atlie r' I ADJUSTED 1983 AVERAGE LtiEEKDAY m 10TH PL W Z TRAFFIC VOLUMES (RWD7 4 NE 10TH ST i0 < FIGUREr,, IGUR 1 Hwy Ni- if 1 KENNYD j'isT T N INTERCHAN 1 SRo ' 1 Rccr NE 30TH ST U_ iE 00 I.;Wf l6TN s 4lCEMNY,7ALE ZV 0' : nf ELEMENTARYEMENARY L In 1111 n O Z nE 213TH ST • NE 2STH ST 32 33 _ - T 24 N-R 5 E WM 33<` 34 C p NE 6400" E 27TH sT 4 0 o W ' •• SE 96T K T 23 N-R 5 E WM 4 3 i CT 5500 h' 45 ` Pvt) (Do z • I .4 '<SE 98TH W KENNYUAI LC) > J N EIERRA HEIGHTSF QQrH57W ' JON a 99TH ELEMENTARY faTf- SCHOOL I- Z ..t PAPK W NE 25TH ST 4 ST C'i. W Z 1 ANTA xSE 1 T ST• H ST NE t 24TH ST 1 SEHST NE 24TH SE C` ISTsNE23RDoo4. •' XXX X X X X 7 J ST4ilN I SE 101ST O ' I' NE I >23RD ST it PR 0 PERTY 7 o SE 102N M i ST W a ZC R SE STV..J (Pvt)NE 180 z O s 22ND ST ° o d o F, 800 w 40 f ni Z Oz W Z N E a •• Ul x S E 103 R D S T SW 1"-1000 W Z z a 215T n y Or (2E 2 ZZFOZ< ST SE -104THST0 4, h CT H NE 20TH ST T Z W NE 207 tre~ Z ram t, O W 800 < W W U Or J` SE l O5 T H O Z z Z ST <I Vt 2 ,. 1 J 05 r r-,, O r NE 20TH 57 Z Xe cx 480 N Jit0 z z NE 19TH ST Pvt) rr' t. Z W NE 18TH Py HILLCREST NEIIBTH SE 67H- ST uZ I) >J 2 z W 3< W ~Sr-Zo`>SC EIt ST f ` t G r p? ,yf (1 NN g O t 0 nZ Z m ser . I r„, NE 17TH P" 1 W \tMAH V fer< CJp r'' 16TAl ..s 1 e. z `' c' r '_S 2 CU2 t N {' $` ?. Z NE 17TH • J NE 17TH ' ST z m a DO N Hlt.til.ANlr NEU. (_ J H ST SE I( 1 NE m < 16TH U ST W r 1 r",i3 I 9 . PA1<K W < 15THST cc >W OZ ORDj2$? 4W2400 _ z g < Z405Ztoil; zer W Tc P1_ayer.cvnd. W Z W Z ram~Q Z O Z I z 5TH * 4 L j4 (4 7 Z > > Z > W ID 0 • .._'`, 1•.• W W < J NE V Z I,.. `pSTJaf'_ t i_ Z Zi 113T O > i SOOzrrr H McKNIGHT Y TH pNp0:4 , . Z JR.HIGH 1t a NE 13TH KP56rvo r5iSTN Z Z SCHOOL 3 S W O ST QO4~ O O .----- W PE O W O W h0 E_-'- USEOzWy > library zo z 0vlaNE12THni54ST `N hJ f C dNE t TH ST . d 4 - 1../.2Z zz in t tiF J 6 < B 9 0 AVE ' Nf Q" 4. 4, SH Pos va v < 8 ; o Office E Q SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY NE t *`BARKt Wr Pr IQ NE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS NORTH RENTON O cs. I HA t 1INTERCHANGENEzAt) % tiF 10 3 r`I PROJECTED 1989 Al.;::-. 2010THP1 A. z W',/, , C y ''y A TOM BER G P. _. D. NE 10TH ST oT < FIGURE 2 V t KENNYD 22srNE30ThST T So" ts v i - k I! s.i,....5\\ s:.................. o..., ie. 5: . KYDALE I : pEENTARY Q 0O O Z YI 2eTH LENE 28TH sT 32 33 250 '' 0 7 24 N-P 5 E WM 33`_ 34 MNEME5q0SE96T1T23N-R 5 E WM 4 3 27_T.1 28027TH ST S4 oy -t E. O CT 280 it y t - n Z Pvl) Oo Z 250 t) '< SE 98TN w r ` x d W rn STSE v l TERRA HEIGHTS Q7r+ STKENNYI)ALE NW >ro ELEMENTARY F ZF yZjL 7IJONS 99TH STSCHOOLZPARKWNE25THSTz ZO ZSE 1 T ST ^— L 24TH ST I '241C • NTA x 350 E r O r us 1p NE < 24TH ST SE 90 ijk rfl a sr` N 8 23RD PE ST X X X p o W SE 101ST 0 Z NE ~ SESIalbsPRoPRTYWSE102ND 0 <, ST 1f) g <• idowing. (Pv1) NE 40 z z l. > W \:.: f2 W I t- • 0 22ND ST z NE to 0 • 0•• to u z SE 103RD 200ST wh, T4 `rl Z tf t W z o W a z l sr W •580' W r 5EE z 2 OI 0 1' IOQQ Z Z< ST SE e-- 104TH ST r C7HQN NE 20TH ST ZW z i f'1 W 150 J O c W ram W W NE 20T ¢ U " r „ f L SE 105TH Z' Z NE 20THSTZST -kw y. z ! P J PE z r , W 0 W z < zU Tay,'O 2 Q 1< NE I Z.- / N£ 19TH ST Pvt) bra C T s TH SE 6TH- ST ,zi, 19TH >1%Jl r 2 t W NE 18TH HILLCREST NE 18 ST4ELEM m S7 Z` Sc St t G r O hE (1 Z p< j O O off' 1 [NE 17TH p• 1 W tMAH O Qp NN O n 2 m Z 16ry," t eV'W I Z a C 5: 0 0 1 ` p Ol' S 8° ". Z NE 17TH _ NE 17TH ST SE ]f W / E l S T I( NE m 16TH U ST N NSTH J WW iW S > oZ oRD1Zgii4` i z W i z t= e` 3'< Z i STH< LCrZ+14J y 405 Z W V W Z W W J Z O W Z) it sT > j g < 0 < Om TH YJ_ 2I 2 IWO STi NE 14TH0 < 0 O0 14TH ST m 13TM KliE/VOvS 72 ._ jam) zZ ZO ; N All.•• 5TJ2t'Q E W l1OSEbOulaNE12TH - < 5LibrarY 150`' d1HE l TH ST — J IT 8 0 f o SN SANTA/TOMBERGPROPERTYIntio .. - N•E- NE PARK oR P: N P2 120 NE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS POHAWNORTHRENTONW • INTERCHANGE NE Z • I1 1011;" ,'E PROJECTEDAWDTGENERATED BY m LOTH Pl iSANTA/TOMBERG P UDNELOTHST204H4 -bp FIGURE 3 1 w r I Y T.. NE J gc KENNYO aJsr T N ENTETR SHAH Iv SC yao 1: t j400catrrI .....\ f r... ii 96TH bi NNYDALE EMENTARY• 8 10 w 301. NE 28IC 0CHOOL ENE 28TH ST 32 33 - 4 970 \\ ZO Y 24 N-I) 5 E WM 33` 34 Q NE Cc r 5 4 N • SE 96T 1i T 23 N-R 5 E WM 4 3 N 27 668Q 27TH ST o • oW CT 5780 970 I z '1z` ti 5 Z c W 0. I Z D "'SE98TH444Z1 W • f : STSE I IERRA HEIGHTS W lihNNYDALE W >N • 9TH ELEMENTARY SF 9q*rt S` FEI.*Tk W T SCHOOL t NAR}< W NE 25TH ST Z ST 1 SE 1..T ST= ^ NE t 24TH ST I 1"-- ill tilX Tr- E NE < 24TH ST SE 30 z NE 390 B ST z SE 101ST rz O 23RD PL YXXX )` 2' F 0NE`` 23RD ST pR P RTY WSE 102N0 <N ST CTSE m Pvt) r NE 22O o J ro a1 zFWw — Z22ND ST A L cr o N Z SE 103RD IOOOWhipstST t* Z Z Nf_ NT1- 1' 7 Wi•=1000• Wz o,,,a 21ST W y 500oE E z z ZO< vZZ ST SE -101TH ST rCrHWy, D W NE 20TH ST NE 207 J + z Y' hG ZW950 >< l- Z ST Cr 10,,, 2 ( VP`Hr J SE ( PITH z r O2W O W NE 20TH ST Z SU iaV I.- W> NE z Z E 19TH ST z N 1Pvl) Grp" r•T J 1 6 H SE 1 6TH•' ST ,n 19TH FI rn l H NE 18 IN HILLCREST NE 18 ST N r4 W h ST F*'SCEM m ST G .1 ? ti (I oirrZC< i 0'— NE 17TH1 I MAN' GO QlIto0nyOzy16ry' '- it' •W P( Z ` P •M SE1 f rot OOE n 15 8n_"Z NE 17TH NE 3 17TH r ST SE I(s T c0 ZO N I+Ic.rll."ir W NE= _ J ST NE i• < 16TH U ST 1, E'AkF.15Tn K WW r W Z Z W ST O >Z OZ ORD 23Nt U .. Z W W W 2400 L,': Z c' q , a. < I N E Z W 1•1.t.14"14}.N> 405 W z8 z W z z i FleyEtround ,t z Z " Q O Z ISTHj< Z >Z > Q 1 ' m0 :.._`.. W Z W J NE b W Z 9OO W W I o S T cy 14TH ST McKNIGHT Z Y NE 14TM < O NE JR.HIGH tij NE :3TH h Q,,, Ke r- oir5 T EHSO Z Z ti SCHOOL 5` O p a _ y I sE P 0 ' / W o W hp a9(1,)E: zZzWLibraryI() z — W J z 0 0 Z_LC.NE 12TH n 5 4 ST < hJ / f C (_ .a C. NE I TH ST 4 rl J --- Lr., i T . _ _ n pR 1 J d W 8 9 AVE . h Q 2W T/ X F 1 z E tH 0 < o° °Of(S« N‘` • fir- SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY o 1 * PARK oa NE W Z a• E TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1• p H NORTH RENTON 2/ "'— INTERCHANGE NE zrPROJECTED 1989 AWDT 10TH —. 0 , iWITH SANTA/TOMBERG P. U. D. c \\ NE 10TH Si 107- < FIGURE 4 I . dizo--011. 21 i Ni N M k. 38 PEAK HOUR 31 L.> —36 E- 224 4:00 - 5:00 PM NE 12TH ST. WEDNESDAY 3_ 2 > 41—f <\ 4 343> DECEMBER 7, 1983 282- 39—",, coati N Ti tD cD 0)1 'RIN J. I. to N v '_45 1989 PM PEAK HOUR 230 III 44 o W/OUT SANTA/TOMBERG NE 12T -I ST. QJ J i P.U.D. 430> 50—f 1 410 ..), 335--.> 45-Th,N o 2n 2 N K) I V r OT tr M '" 1- k_--50 1989 PM PEAK HOUR E- i L 275tj 180 F- 235 45 WITH SANTA/TOMBERG NE 12TH ST. P.U.D. 444% 60_T f> 415___> 335---> 45— ' O O2NM 21 CO SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY TRAFFIC ANALYSTSIII r PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME NE 12TH ST. AT KIRKLAND AVE. NE FIGURE 5 I 1318Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 19, 1985 APPLIC ANT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES FILE NUMBER: R- 014- 84, PPUD- 015- 84 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of joint land use actions to allow: 1) rezoning of 47.7 acres of property from G- 1, General, to R- 1, Residential - Single Family, and R- 2, Residential - Two Family; and. 2) a Preliminary P.U.D. for a two- phase multi-family development consisting of 185 dwelling units. The first phase of the P.U.D., located on the south side of Honey Creek, will consist of 99 dwelling units. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.Owner of Record: Honey Creek Associates 2.Applicant: Honey Creek Associates 3 Location: Vicinity Map Attached)Located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. 4.Existing Zoning: G- 1, General Use. 5 Existing Zoning in the Area: R- 1, Residential - Single Family; R- 2, Residential - Two Family; and P- 1, Public Use. 6 Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single Family, Low Density Multi-Family and Greenbelt. 7.Size of Property: 147.7 acres 8.Access:Jefferson Avenue N.E. 9.Land Use: Undeveloped. 10.Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped East: Single Family Residences South: Single Family Residences; Hillcrest Elementary School, and North Highlands Park. West: Single Family Residences C.HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject property is currently being processed as an annexation in addition to the requested land use action. D.PUBLIC SERVICES: 1.Utilities: a. Water: There are 6-inch water lines located along N.E. 24th Street, N.E. 23rd Street and N.E. 21st Street. Eight inch lines are located along N.E. 23rd Place, Harrington Avenue N.E. and Kirkland Place N.E. All lines are near the subject property. b. Sewer: There are 8-inch sanitary sewer lines located along N.E. 23rd Place, N.E. 21st Street, Jefferson Avenue N.E., and Kirkland Place N.E. c.Storm Water Drain ge: Storm water from the subject property flows into the May Creek Drainage System. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES: R- 014- 84, PPUD- 015. 84 FEBRU.ARY 19, 1985 PAGE 2 2.Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3.Transit: METRO Transit Route 1#11 operates along N.E. 16th Street approximately 1300 feet south of the subject property. 4.Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Hillcrest Elementary is approximately 200 feet south of the subject site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately 2400 feet south of the subject property. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is located approximately 1.3 miles southeast of the subject site. 5.Recreation: North Highlands Park is approximately 1000 feet south of the subject site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1.Section 4- 704, General Use (G- 1). 2.Section 4- 706, Residential - Single Family (R- 1). 3.Section 4- 708, Residential - Two Family (R- 2). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1.Section 4- 3014(C), Change of Zone Classification. 2.Title 4, Chapter 27, Planned Unit Development Ordinance. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant, Honey Creek Associates, is requesting a joint annexation, rezone, and preliminary planned unit development approval on a site of 47.7 acres. The Hearing Examiner conducts the public hearing for the rezone request and the preliminary planned unit development. The following analysis divides the two requests and applies the appropriate criteria. REZONE 2.The applicant is requesting a rezone of 47.7 acres into the following three zoning classifications: R- 2 Multiple Family Residential 6 acres R 1 Single Family Residential 29 acres G- 1 General Use 12.7 acres The requested rezone appears to be appropriate based upon the review criteria. 3.The Hearing Examiner must consider the specific review criteria under Section 4. 3014(C)(1): a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The property is in the joint procedure of concurrent annexation and rezone review and has not been specifically considered by the City in either of its last land use analysis or area zoning. b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES: R- 014. 84, PPUD-015- 84 FEBRUARY 19, 1985 PAGE 3 The Comprehensive Plan Map for the Northeast Quadrant shows an area in the southwest corner of the subject site as potentially Low Density Multiple Family. The central portion of the site, where Honey Creek is located, was designated as part of the Greenbelt while there were two areas in the northeast and eastern portion of the site that were generally designated as Single Family Residential. The Comprehensive Plan is a general guide and a general policy document. Specific review of the site shows that there are slopes exceeding reasonable limits where development should be prohibited. It appears that the specific site was not considered in detail during the Comprehensive Plan process. Basically, the topography of the site directs where certain development activities should be located and, in fact, was one of the primary reasons for only developing the southwest corner of the subject site since public services are not available east of Honey Creek. Therefore it does appear that the Comprehensive Plan Map and policies do support the requested rezone. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The subject site has never been zoned within the City of Renton, but it does appear that development surrounding the site has generally increased to the south and west of the subject site. Weatherwood II borders the site on the west and the housing developments from WW II borders the site on the south. Access can now be provided by extending public streets into the subject site. d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. The final criterial for evaluation of a rezone request is timeliness. The subject property appears to be the next incremental piece of property as the City expands eastward in this general area. In fact, the site has been surrounded by other development because of the limitations of slope and accessibility until this time. In addition, public improvements including sewer and water have not been available to the site in the past. This would suggest that it is timely to rezone the property for development. PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 4.The applicant is seeking a PPUD to allow the construction of 185 units on a total of 47.7 acres in two phases. The first phase consists of 99 units located in the southwest corner of the subject site. The remainder of the development will be located in the northeast portion of the site when services are eventually available. The development will include 78 apartment style units stacked in three-story buildings along with 8 apartment units in a two-story building with the remaining 13 units as townhouse units in the extreme southwest corner of the site. The development will also include a cabana, spa, pool, tot-lot, and tennis courts for the on- site recreational amenities of Phase I. 5. Minimum site area required in a PUD by Section 4- 2708(1) is four (4) acres. The subject complies with this criteria. PREL11 NARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINE}, HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES: R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 FEBRUARY 19, 1985 PAGE 4 6.The proposal must comply with a series of standards and development criteria. The applicant, at this time, is not proposing to subdivide the property for subsequent sale. 7.Approximately 70% of the site is retained in open space because of topography. Steep ravines surrounding Honey Creek makes that area almost unbuildable for residential development. This complies with the minimum 20% requirement for outdoor open space. 8.Specific residential open space per dwelling unit will be shown with the final design plans in the final PUD. Most of the outdoor open space has been concentrated around the recreational activities in the southwest corner of the proposal. Approximately 25% of the level plateau of 9.5 acres has been retained for outdoor recreational space. It appears that, in the conceptual stage, the proposal complies with this intent, but specific detailed calculations will have to accompany the final PUD for approval. 9.The applicant has set back all of the structures so that a minimum 25 foot landscaped buffer can be provided along the western property line which abuts the single family residential area. In fact, that area will be left in perpetual open space because of the roadway extension for Jefferson Avenue N.E. will bend slightly to the east and come down to service the planned unit development. The only thing crossing the greenbelt would be the extensions of already established streets at N.E. 21st and N.E. 23rd streets. 10.Building "J" is approximately 85 feet from the western property line of the proposed project. Single family residences are located to the west of the project and Building "J" would have be located at least 100 feet from that property line or comply with the specific height and size criteria. Building J" appears to be over that criteria, but it could be either moved or reduced in size by breaking the five proposed units into two buildings. This should be specifically addressed as a special requirement in the final PUD. 11.Where a PUD is located adjacent to special areas where flood water, steep slopes, or geological hazards, additional criteria are added. In this special case, the site is specifically limited by its steep slopes. Approximately 20.8 acres of the 47.7 acre site has slopes in excess of 15%. The PUD ordinance specifically calls out for a reduction in density for those areas. The average slope for those areas is approximately 55.9% by utilizing the slope formula 5=100 x I x L/A). This slope was determined based upon using the 25 foot contour interval over the 20.8 acres of sloped area. Based upon that calculation, the following density calculations are appropriate. Density Calculation, Slope Reduction, and Use Reduction Zoning Class Area No. Units/Acre Total Units R-2 6.0 12.0 72.00 R-1 29 20.9(less 15% but with 20% reduction) 4.84 101.6 8.1 (over 15% slope/56% slope/ 82% reduction) 87 7.05 G-1 12.7 (over 15% slope/56% slope/ 82% reduction) 22 2.79 SUB 1OTAL 183.00 Jefferson Ave N.E. Dedication 85 acres) 4.00 GRAND [DIAL 179.00 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES: R- 014- 84, PPUD- 015- 84 FEBRUARY 19, 1985 PAGE 5 The Building and Zoning Department initially calculated the density based upon the slope formula across the entire lot. The Policy Development Department, in its initial review of the annexation, calculated it only on the steep sloped areas. The City Code does not appear to be specific and therefore the Building and Zoning Department concurs with the earlier calculations of Dave Clemens, the Policy Development Director. ISSUE 12. The primary issue is whether access is adequate to allow the development of 99 units in the southwest corner of the subject site? The Environmental Review Committee specifically reviewed this problem and issued their declaration to allow only the 99 units (Phase I) "provided that access to the subject property shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E., N.E. 21st Street, and N.E. 23rd Street. N.E. 23rd Street shall be built to city standards and dedicated to the City from the project's west property line to Harrington Place N.E. Jefferson Avenue N.E. shall be extended northward to connect with N.E. 23rd Street and shall be build to city standards and dedicated to the City". The primary problem is that the estimated traffic of approximately 600 vehicle trips will pass through single family residential areas. Six hundred (600) vehicle trips were not considered significant by the Environmental Review Committee to require a full Environmental Impact Statement or to prohibit the project. Emergency access will be provided at N.E. 23rd Street will a possibility of future expansion to a full public street while full streets will be brought into the subject site at N.E. 21st Street and Jefferson Avenue N.E. Since there are two access points, it would appear that traffic could either go to the south through an existing low density multiple family area or to the west through a single family area. The site is approximately two blocks east of Edmonds Avenue N.E. which is a major arterial and provides the major collector arterial function for this neighborhood. 13.The subject site still has a problem with the steep slopes and the possibility of slope instability resulting from the initial construction. Special measures may have to be taken during construction to control the temporary erosion and revegetate some of the steeper slopes. Extensive hydroseeding may be necessary along with additional plantings and it would be appropriate for the applicant, during the final PUD approval, to submit specific revegetation plans for review by the Landscape Architect and the Hearing Examiner. 14.Comments from the various City departments focused upon the problems of storm drainage, sewage disposal, and access. Since the original application was submitted early in 1984, the City has acquired the necessary easements to locate the new Honey Creek sewer trunkline along the central ravine shown running through the subject site. The City will construct the main sewer line and maintenance roadway along the bottom of the ravine. The issue of available sewer has been resolved. Access can be resolved by construction of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and the tie- in at N.E. 21st Street and emergency tie- in at N.E. 23rd Street. The Environmental Review Committee has specifically considered plans and approved those for the emergency access at N.E. 23rd Street. 15.In conclusion, the PUD proposal appears appropriate in that it provides adequate buffers, access, public services, and follows the intent and function of the Comprehensive Plan. The Hearing Examiner should recognize that even though the application states 185 units totally, that only 179 units can be constructed under the present calculations. In addition, the northeast portion of the site is included in the land area but not approved for review by the Environmental Review Committee until adequate utilities and services are available to the east of Honey Creek. PREL M]NARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES: R-014-84, PPUD-015- 84 FEBRUARY 19, 1985 PAGE 6 H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Wised upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner r( commend to the City Council the following: 1.Approval of the rezone request, file R-014-84, subject to approval of the preliminary PUD. 2.Approval of the preliminary PUD, PPUD-015- 84, subject to the following conditions: a. Reduction of the PUD to 99 units (Phase I only). b. Submission of detailed plans in the final PUD to include: 1) all residential open spaces; 2) compliance with Building "J" with setback and volume requirements under Section 4-2709(2)(D); 3.Detailed treatment plan for the greenbelt areas including restoration and increasing on-site vegetation to stabilize the steep slopes. 4.Detailed improvements plans showing the location and construction standards for Jefferson Avenue N.E., the extensions of N.E. 21st Street, and the emergency access intertie on N.E. 23rd Street. r- I I it 1-.1 --T- I _• Pn it lc co,"'' see »II 1 - --t, --,I--— a G I1 G-1 1 ; 0,10.4 1 N/ 4O'5 •04 40e ZV") 20! RENTON CIT LIM.7 I la ,. - 1- --. _-- kl1I P-1 7 4. ..4': i 1 1" - r j-- i f 1 I 1 W j ji{— grkk,. tX X., a1l N ',SIERRA HEIGHTS 205 w1-+Ts.4i' e """°' ELEMENTARY SCHOOL E. V 6q.a l. KT 1 . le.' 1•. I 01,,,I.,..••'h S.1.tl: f 4. I 'I I 'Kiel44 1 ' 1{ s 1• • . JI 1' II K, LI.I i.I ' • Qr, •••1 y• 6 ' I°' a • ' _ ROO" j.I amigo J I voila. rim Slid• _ ffl 7 rills 1 — ' 7;": - I I 1 ! 11 IP r 4 -----. - i t. m. ri. A F . s ' ii, „*...... '-1.... liri web, . Gi ...cub a. 14 14 itir. ;4' 2+. 1 ill- H i L__L ' -C _I.. t • . .. . ' i t I b'p s i217 20e ,`'t!,•' i • + PUCKS' I:'/' "4t Q / r I.1.". I[ IFMfNT Rom(. 1 1 II ._ 1' ••J4 F,'.,j S 1r i Sn1001 1 1 ,.A bt_ 1 I ' , : 1jk1 00 I j 1 I z s a 1 p II': 21 20y ,, ••' a 1. PAPr, 9 +` / - 1• '' •' 11 I 1 1...._1 G 1`` u 1 I l 1 L. i q Fr1.t1• I sr) M • ' •I. }{ h, R3 % is--- .. EIRLI. ... t r• i - 1 f EItB1J'IZ, ;— ` Mc AN IGSI I 16 4L.ti R-3• J M i . ' ,Al i • .;• 4 ..1 ,1.1 ' H imigoLmr IT r--,:, ..,i,,,,, . _\,-, . , , i,. ,. ft. .-- • ' , 46 I • ieMN 3 Man ' s ,: t ,.i -, I I 41t' '. ." 1'''',. h .''I HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES R-014-84 PPUD-015-84 APPL.I CANT HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA - 47.7 ACRES PR I NC I PAL ACCESS JEFFERSON AVE N.E. EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE REZONE TO G-1, R-1 and R-2 and P.U.D. FOR 185 UNITS (99 UNITS -- COMP REHENS I VE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY, LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILYPHASE I) AND GREENBELT COMMENTS LAND U.! ELEMENT Nu.. ziwic. a> 76'-, ST Single FamilyCommerciali• 1JUNOjINNS 111111ir / iii I Low Density Office / OfficePal9wIllrlai: i:*] Multi-Family,„,....• i.,i.,:::.:. sil 313:.. :::::i::. 0.0.v:/- • g 31:::::: V Medium Density 0.....000...0.0000:Public/Ouasi-Publ411:•_ si us mill e :•:•:... Multi-Family . 0...0.0 0.0000. oellP 9 I ,,, 1 !,, w_ il,i ;..,: i ,;,:o:',',:::,:ii:',,, HighMultiattFYamily Light Industrial 6.°•°. Heavy Industrial:,..,-..: L. ffl,* Recreation c••'•c t•• .:... .,.....II V d ';••• ' d"te.'.•'d.') ` i - C; ' ' a. ,.0-Z.*:"7:4::`-'. '.... S'g r•,'-`'' Greenbelt ManufacturingPalMIL/ ''-',".- .'`. ....,••••:,`!.:.4:4;;;.•-A-Aj.1.:7';-., ,:..- a. gt„...-ec-,;-.4 - t., ..., ec..%.:„? • --.1alitill$ 3, i„. c, -,..,..„........,„; .. c'..". .,... z.•...'1'4.f.:..;C:.. F.5- r ..,,.; ciVi ':.". . 1.5..1"-G: •:.. ..p,. 7.:?;5.•‘:-..*,....:••••• ' 1•••IMP Ar2.,:,.. ., ilav,._ .....0.• ill N.,,,44 lair: 000.16.0.0.A..0. A N'' . 0 4 4 11.,-- 1117tortaik. 4 ,L i.•.,,,• 0, ..1.: ::. .:: •, .,.,. 1 c..•:;:_,. nil 411, tiiiii f! rliiill r)",:::::11841444•r6.)• 1 s., MM.In 41 1 i sist Iri; t ... • : mews i .- r•••• 1 0 siiMiell 4 1 I.• 0CiiTo°6 .40 ' 3°1 infilis MA° i . I" 0000.,, A4 •'. F;$ IIIqe,•• Hum r—P• ai a . iiiii i o.o.o.o.o, , 77.77• 11, s, Vo. ....;',. 71. '••••*0.4.11kIllikr:Millgr7 1. i:111,15ii•Filiiiiiliilliollin 11111 Mni:::W 000000•00000000 7-';'; •••---i1. ::::::::••• r r.• ,., i:::i::: "-=''--- •- ::•iiig ,'14$tilriiii. v., 00000000• 00000000000. r.•-•.:,. ' e4,::1,I gel II 0o0o.c.000x000.at,:lreili : a.,,,• \• • . , i : i.ii] rrr...NE- A.611.- 4 .::*:7447:0.Yil'411':it IIIIIIIa '‘ MEI Q,• • i:i::.:.::.::(NNSt`.........".‘ k& .:.:::..... Vijes 1..... ,, am. t e \::::•]: :/ Aim w„..„, .. ....,1 i 000.01ioc 1, e811 --iN smos.:-, L ••i 1111111TO v. 0000.o.o.00000000000. I, p,. .,4 00..... 8 wan itAt • 11/2111 1 eilli • • MIT.f.: 1 Ili i::h.:':':.:. •ie. III • 10 • • • • \WI • :,:: ....I All1 • • • •b • I ••••••4••• . ' ‘Ig 11. i::::::::,,,,,... ., i,„:,:,:,::::.: • Ti1 • • • ' fI • 114 161111-"611 ii N. i •.* • MIIMENNO 1, 81 • •••••.A li 0... amnia."' go l' i41 0•0 0 •:•:•:•:•::::::.:.:.:-:-:•••:.:.:•:•:•::: ri11t• •60 • 44 ci 00'oo• ::::::::::.:.:.::.:•••••:•••••:.:•:•:•.. natt :11-`,'f) 416( ''leffiliktA1111.it 0111r . 000 ...............-........................ 1.1 N.,........ ____ji,),.,r_..... . i„.. .....:::::.::::..:.::••••••:.;. 1.:::••!.••i 8•• -• .rr.r..... .. temstroIS. • • i'll 0.0°0°0 000000000• 1.1111.114•11111k-- 4 jar 7,11::::11111111! :::::::::•:::::.:.:.:: 7,....Es.._••_•_.. :.::::::-..:::::.::•.:.:.:•:.::::::::•:. i.,'• •'' ::::ii::::i::i*i::.:... ....:.::i:i: 0000000.o00.000. 00o..0o. o.000000000.00000. . ........ 71,,,,,,,e' :•.: •• ••? i::.::.:::i::.:::......:i.::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::1::;::•:..• 1 ,1,...:1 _ jai, ja,.. 4:i::i*;,..•:, •: ::::•:•••• ..:.: i:::::i:;iiii. 0 0 0 0000000000000.. 00000000000000000%. .ilil......:..,:. ii: i iii::'.1W.i: ii•ii'i!:1:1:1::::.: II rZli .:...•.. : ii:!*,,'''''''',..,- ..::::::::::*0:i::::*:::: .000.00000000.0000... i: ::::::::.:.:.:.:.:.:•:•:.:•::::: 000000000• 00000o0o0oc. o0o0o. , :::::, %o. 1 ...' ,.- iilefiribielelitsr,"7..: .... .::.:;.::::::;:::i:::i::::::i::::::::i::::: i:::::. 1:00%001:01oolooloolo:00010. 0:0010:00o: o° 0:00: 0:;60: 1 1 t::....::.•::.. i::::......::::.*::. 0,-‘..........:::. 1••••••in Fs!, 4p j ,i•••9101 7 . ( di,a! 00• • •:-:•::::.:.:•:.:.:•:.:':':':•:- • 0000000000000000000. ! ix ..,.........0000• •::.:.:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::, 00000000000000000000000. .....:.:.!.:.:.:.:.:: O'' 1 ..... ..alipl • ,( I,. ?lb. iiir!r 000.0000000000%, I •:. : :i:::;::::: i; 0.••••••„ 0.00•••0.0. 000000. 0. 00000% 00000, ,4 I --...MIMI fre Vo°0°0°- I; 000000000.. 00.... 4...: ::•••::::.:•:•:-:•: 4.?„ ..., Vi"•• ifee). , • • fr. \ - 000000. L1,.: .......„ y„:, x, 4bsi• 01., ,:,,C:11'::n c ]]]:ii:i*i:i•i:]:]: ..J1',7:" 4.. . "°°• '-‘4,`• :.•.•:-:•.-:•:::::::: - 5)0•?...4.• •4,•;-',.%,,!, ,,..; ..::::::::::::.:.:.•: j ,: ,je, ...,. •. e:,:i....• ,,,,••••:•:•:••••••••,'.. : i.:EE4....r.,,,•;,,q,, 1.:,,,..„:'. 12,s... 0, 4:. :::::i:•:.:.i.::::::: ::. I ' 7•C3-:••)70.•••••1. ,,A.' ,,,s 716•S.':',.;''4.. 5,1' ';.:''')..';-''''.;...P.'. 1.: 0!•?.ii"...VC:'j.:%?-=..O:',-;.',*•ne?,•:3 '::::::::::-:•:•::::: II1.111111010° .:f,,• 64:0,7,,I.‘ :,.,- -1,-,b3.-sxJ Vi.•;,;.!'.;),,.6 ''.ry. c' 4•12.1,..).„(?'),.?:„•:., /..!;;,:?)..-'?:'.:. 5e ya r!,':( 1-;i-4:.',/-. ":•::: ::::: 11-60A%- M.44.---":1).••;16;VIP".: 1 .1° T13')%"? *'."."21.... .. 71:0,;•:;•• 1','.• V 1.3''.. •' 1 : i\ -0';r? ; C C 1"" ••••. ,. 7i,••.5!' - A il'A 1' r.,, , AM+, , .,•-(. e Al cYke3 r-' v • '. 1,Cf.•,•iez• • ' ,• •„..--:," ., i2*. e'-• ' 4' 1.i, ''ei. ..,,e;.•'/J'ielfy.f;! -, iii 1, 1i. .....«.:.:- . •()".1` "44:1111411M '-•-•P --- i., — fil 7- 7,,';',-.1..YL',.'‘..' f",•,(i.,,- ' t,''''S.'(•.,• .0 • *O._ --•••• 'frto.T....k.':.• - eft, Illee• •` - ,i, t,. ; v. • ,T,..-..!-':1A,.. !:',...-, .•..Z).<, •: 410,0,,,T, f,,71.•..!ti.•rf• 0/ 4, .Ovt, .-41.64.,.... ..e..„.A.Y,,, t,": 77,..re.. --.,:;:,'aim1q,.,,,,,,o,..,,,,,,,, . . -,-t---- i-:;::,--,".. e * ''4 111‘,, WAII411111k?...,.C:\re•YWc.1..''2`ii- '•••,, 1111 i'l;•,),• v",,; C. 1•7;:'• e'?,. 6',V f' •*' •'',;,.••.;' 01:19• 1*-i:, •••ilk e*!.,*; Jil,'!;;',?"•''' c .0:.itp..,.. 0",`),130•-‘;..c,'•',,, i.t.), .," s _.'-• ••VP: ir''t:',,. •• :'":''.,- *.,, 1‘..i 1•??..:7),4%-V? '0.3:q; ,'3e. p...:;;'• `t:. ....b.;., p• NIN1 ...•.,3;;',;' e:;,••?:** V,C ',.' ',`5*, f..!•,-,;;:,,...I I I•-.,co:000001o. ree:.•'e'd•'''''' i't, A.'.,o,...0.0`,, ei:i,•.•`;(.?`: g; ,(-Z4 . . .., --N. '."*...;,,f,,,, . Mr:1k,"1•;e,tr!,,, 11"..., 1,..;. 51..2 I.%.:„:Vj*)M166• 1'fil 1)' ef .1.0' .1-7n '7oo 141 .0-47e6`...k;. • ' :?.54'; .-'•0•• •-.?.'',-1'. -•,-`,.,,,,,...--, . .. ;... .• 6,:.. ,.. .. 9 ti.v,';••f ':•: S *;,'•,`..,%`•'i-r'.'',•:, 1.& 41 • - '"V'. 13) IA ....„.../. ... , i n nI .".IS• nT'.n,'"''.., 1 ",..,':-,^,-,,'6•7• , ."...., 7IIne!',.'.e N..1Ver 7. 0 0•! C n%c'•.`,?•-.P.ct.,;A,'"•'11)W",'',.,,'ii.",-Z•:','1,,t,411. • , ..0 • 1•1'. 1!..''• ''.:,. ... 4 e-,2.' c!..:. '" _ '.,.••"•••'< f.,::••• .f...'2:•-• t, ,.,..•4•1':t',.,`. .,; it,,!,..,;(3;.0:v,„,i.).;v,,.,iy,•,- ..0.,-..a: 4%. ••,-,..,,,,,,ip\--,-,..:-....._--- 4#-'r......... •,, ,-1 s:91(p1„.r,,,,,,,,o, , ,.4f)..-1.•,,:,J.: '''," tiV!.:,z).0•4'v.. "- I.:1,°. .• , 4%.. 0 0; 0' r . • k... r• - ro• .N,el ': •i; z.V. •,., u..•:.v.,:•••••-..L.A.6 - ; .z.`' .. n•'0. • s•'!•11' a lit.•.`4',,fl'ili'.',.. •C.5-: • r 0 r•il-•• ec. • -4,1- ,4, . z• 1• It'•:, • -"s• ri„;••,s. A...,;,,,:•,,:.';',0,.4.-„;..,ci,•,;'."•• • 0 •• iit'cir,a,''' c•.. ',.... '.•( 5',..i!to t.-:."•,,, tlila,..,%t•ttr.3, s- t ; • A. cv,,f4ftii- Iv• -.,- k, ..009,000000-•,.,,.- \-,.....::: ig :i*::i:i:i::::.:,..„,..,,x,i, v':. c0•••\.1. 4 j.r' ' q -...e:e...- 0.gfXq. f:. T.,•,..y5:1• 00000• 00.• k .....:.:,,,:„„„„,:„„,,„,:::..,.,„-,,i V A,c'Op ot;.,. 000• ,••• •\ 1/4, 000 000 •o •oo 0..'V::•••,r ;.. 4.), 4\ 1,__,LP_______ /. Wi '''-' 000• ..: •• All....777 ' .,•• Xiii- •''• r4kir.H . .• •:-•,,•'!.;(;,•.:0' '''••- . rto• ? 4•,..,6;,(2.', v'41.. o...:ti,. •,,•'.• . , i:i0i .‘: ''"" • ' a . 0.040. ..... 0000• •ovoc_ic.• \ le -`. '''•••!VolIP'-'^ z+.•••'..••••••'•Z: s• . 1›. .1?...,' ,,,. Cg(10;LL.•4 A C‘:.:'.1. :01;14...t.V. I Po."P••, •Sir.:.;i'i..,-- 0_0_0 0• ''' e VICINITY MAP Mfll MR 1 1 i i I I I 2. ..". J-C--0-- 1 \\ 11 I? \j j 7• w• c. uL' TDk•6N - ^ 1 11 I btMp R-1 son• !i LiY r- I Ii'‘ \N a e II 111 1 1 I%i .,...,„ .,.., 7 I: ToRNEDD7opww_ oF. I •kh .... r OAAINIUM_.UNITS i ww. ,.., \‘ \ t -A z \ su. orr Z;f k\ 0 c )s' . ;7'' llii%\ nW01t014. M‘)A1/4\14 0 ft" ----W. 2 11 )14fit"I: NI" Th 2 o i _;1_'• itr')Aft01---f\'\ ‘‘. , Th V lli g Cas:, !O. 1. 4' -AI C-- NX, - , i-C--((( f(y PieT iurss01 j4\t( 1 r\ r9u iq r A• 11i'Ve-14 ' ' 1 '' aIllI, \\,_ ,op gwar,, pardpt ,, , k 4 ir u tarvett i* r. N Ei A a ..• _- fui ':'\ ,,, 1' 13,v 7„,; stot\ 1: , , a olmorr=1-- -..-:214.4 " 1 gC 7Th. n ) a Th 4010 1 W___Th 7, z 11 , 414.- 1!: ZgiftSi-44t. \ 1 t '.- 4 ,:-.--- 01)) 31 L ( \\ ( \ i N M•i7"J•'N 19M A' I \` \ \ Imo- t O l V G APPROVED 1 AFT—WED WITH CONDITIONS APPROVED C.)/ 4 e/G / 7c, h c L A DATE : -- 7i7SIGNATUREOFDIRORAUTHORZEDREPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I NOT APPROVED deor-oryi DATE :9/C723/8r SIGNATURE OF IIRECT R R AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 In the initial review of this proposed Rezone/Planned Unit Development, the Environmental Review Committee was advised by several City departments that addition..il information would be necessary in the following areas: 1. Water, Water Courses 2. Traffic Impacts 3. Public Services (especially Fire) 4. Utilities 5. Recreation A revise3 plan addressing some of these concerns was submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on April 16, 1984. Based upon review of this plan, the following observations can be made: o No development should be permitted on the east side of Honey Creek for five 5) years or until the City can provide water, sewer, and public safety services, whichever occurs first. Regarding traffic, approximately 782 Average Daily Trips can be expected to result from this first phase development. Traffic as such should not be a major problem. However, the specific access points and range of improvements must be stipulated. Related to traffic, the Fire Department has expressed concern about apparent singular access to the southwest portion of the site from N.E. 21st Street and Jefferson Avenue N.E. The revised site plan submitted indicates an emergency access extending south from the end of the proposed cul-de-sac to Kirkland Place N.E. An easement for this access must be secured and properly improved. EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION _ APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS J NOT APPROVED 27_e„,,es viD 642_ 4„..).. vd v A-4, /' G z/6/e DATE; IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : rZl1Fi-ic L G l C—R \1JC OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Sep-J 4/1 c_11 r)ur,4 DATE: '10 E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE D REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 162 1Jar>- 1.7T—tTC"—CI art-rc--atictr 1 WC—WOUTa i iice the iv! low,n y lInTo1 mat ion: 1 . NE 23rd Street between Harrington Place NE and the proposed development site shows a right-of-way width of 20 feet . Our question is, is this not a more direct route in and out of the development site? If so, can the 20-foot right-of-way be expanded to 50 feet to match the existing roadway on NE 23rd St.? 2. NE 21st Street between the development site and the west end of . tax lot 134 shows only a 30-foot right-of-way. Fifty feet is needed for a complete roadway entrance from Harrington Place. Please address this problem. 3. All access roads to the development site are to be fully improved curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting, etc. ) . Confirm provisions. for accesses at 122nd Ave. SE, SE 100th St. , Jefferson Ave. NE, 21st Ave. NE or NE 23rd St. and show the limits of the access improvements . 1 A A ) e-, Ac ii/ 1 /1(6.- zrk=?'s)r j Sitittckid a16-e-. 7'"1-=.14/"-iL"1-4- '.a.-4'.74-.6' L-4-44/'?-41--- driLe- /- - CiS7L-Kw-----6/ by al— a ( -8 '- WQ-CoVel ter-% C.i ,,d min e,r.., r r e4,,.c_e_. W i Vie pro IPose_.4 G- rv e cz,,. ccc.e.sS c 7-AA)t7 'T e cei y&e:( 4 Gi 61) 6 K'evtawe. L 1-Str 4-, 71„..,,,,,...4.......,al- As part of the traffic analysis we would like the following information: I . NE 23rd Street between Harrington Place NE and theproposeddevelopmentsiteshowsaright-of-way width of 20 feet. Ourquestionis, is this not a more direct route in and out ofthedevelopmentsite? If so, can the 20-foot right-of-waybeexpandedto50feettomatchtheexistingroadwayonNE23rdSt.? 2 NE 21st Street between the development site and the west endoftaxlot134showsonlya30-foot right-of-way. Fifty feetisneededforacompleteroadwayentrancefromHarringtonPlace. IPleaseaddressthisproblem. 3. All access roads to the development site are to be fullyimprovedcurbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting, etc.) . Confirm provisions for accesses at 122nd Ave. SE, SE 100th St. , Jefferson Ave.NE, 21s; Ave. NE or NE 23rd St. and show the limits of the access improvements. The revised proposal for the Santa/Tomberg PUD, though easier for us to serve, still presents some problems that need be addressed. 1. Tie narrow roadways in the existing residential area are inadequate t) handle the estimated increase in vehicular traffic. 2. Wien the second phase of the development is constructed it will ncessitate the additional personnel and district (including a vehicle). 3. Building will be numbered - West A-B-C, etc. and East A-B-C 4. Proper security devices on all doors requiring same. 5. Adequate site lighting. 6. What is the grade % for emergency access? ylqf8if Capt. , H. Bourasa Renton Police Department MEMORANDUM TO Environmental Review Commit e - Jerry Lind DATE 2-2-84 FROM Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal SUBJECT Response to Annexation posal ECF - 014-84/Rezone R-014-84/PPUD-015-8. Water Utilities Current fire flow to this area is minimal for single family residence. A water distribution main system would be required to provide larger flows for fire suppression. The average fire flow required for a typical wood-frame building just under 12,000 square feet is 3000 gpm at 20 psi. All buildings 12,000 square feet or more would be required to be sprinklered. Fire Response Renton Fire Department response to the proposed area is anticipated to be from either side of the ravine, depending on the location of the-incident. Fire and aid incidents in the southwesterly portion of the development would require response via Harrington or Kirkland Avenue N.E. to Jefferson Avenue N.E. The estimated time of response from the first-in fire company located at N.E. 9th and Harrington Avenue N.E. would be two-three minutes. The response to the northeasterly portion of the development would more than likely be via Edmonds Avenue N.E. to N.E. 27th, east on N.E. 27th to 122 Avenue S.E., south on 122 Avenue S.E. to the development. Response time statistics are not available to that area at present, however it is anticipated that they would be in excess of four minutes, given the present condition of N.E. 27th, S.E. 97th, 120th Place S.E. or Devils Elbow", as it is more commonly referred. Alternative response routes would greatly increase the travel distance, thereby increasing the response time. Response time to areas along Union Avenue N.E. inside-the city are in excess of five minutes at present. If this annexation is approved, an upgrading of the roadway to City of Renton street standards should be required along S.E. 97th and 120th Place S.E. to provide safe vehicle travel. Scope of Annexation Due to the irregular boundaries that would be created by this proposal, the scope of this annexation should be increased to include the area bounded by the present city limits on the west, S.E. 95th Way on the north, and the present quarter section line depicted on the east. Emergency Vehicle Access Roadways Two means of emergency vehicle access are required for both sites. One of which may be gated or secured in a manner approved by the Fire Chief. The Fire Code requires all access roads in excess of 150 feet in length, be equipped with an approved turnaround for fire vehicles. An outside turning radius of 45 feet is required for parking or access roads. Access roads are required to be a minimum of 20 feet in width. In summary, the attached annexation and PUD is not approved, subject to changes with suggested and revised nlnns to hp c,,hmitted. Access depicted on the revised site plan does not provide sufficient details to indicate how it will connect to the present Kirkland Place N.E. Additional information is needed on proposed grade of the access road. (Eight percent allowed without application to the Board of Public Works for variance.) Access proposed should be an extension of the private drive and be open to the public without barricades. Cul-de-sac with planting islands will be required to be marked "Fire Lane No Parking" unless islands are removed. Detailed water utility and other fire protection required will be made at the time of the building permit application. JFM:mbt iiv vvrcl i tivv rLcmJL" rrcuviut c UMMtiv t 5 IV The BUILDINQ ZC; ING D PARTM''0' BY 5:GO P.M, ON FEBRUARY 7 184 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1,rilury APPROVED ETAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT 10 LATE COMERS ABRLEMENT • WATER No PezmaPi SG,1u- , (4c, jE'c 'U',G„Q LATE COMERS AOREEMENF • SEWER wd cfze 446N.2„) SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CURIE • HATER S 17 ' w 4S ""r 1 J pow ()-' SYSTEM REVELIPMENT WAGE • SEWER S 17S°= Pt/umii Stcd.uc(J S L SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHURL • WATER N0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CNACRE • SEWER No of K1 A 41N 60 APPROVED WATER PLAN Y6S 6sc aU.,M . A r •S APPROVED F/R PLAN Ie7 APPROVED FIRE 'MART LOCATIONS 165 IT FIRE REPT. inn FLOW ANALYSIS yt5S 0/‘DATE:7 &I' SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPPRESjENTATIVE ryt21 #1124/0 REVISION 5/19_/ Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : JAPPROVED EAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Oi°PL/c41-,vr S//UULU /Pec s/off 7.-is`e67cooUpgCr .tJ v i / 0/ ye T D A) P /rf 74/41e-c 1'YST i's m 4/N MM.) 7-7 J hrs/ tier it m-viPn a T //0/ve - C?ezy • Ma) Meer 7//f' 6O/,v 6 TO DO t &s LS/YIz-t r ,cc74iittW /Jpiv/ e ,Peee,{ 7 7i S YS %-17Y7 -f,Pelit' Ta G E X 41 G. "4i 'L/L ('cot,a o,V SL L 7/e 9 S 6/5 g-"T3' t— C d v 2TS S//d ve,o c--;- P/?C) cI ji7 -47 c .- S T/G,fTf /n mcr oA) iraety ,y/6,zlr' c 5 44.J2-/t REc DATE: j!a.t'r / - rS'47/ IGNATURE OF DIR CT OR AUTHORIZED EPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIC- - n APPROVED APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED c)4 474404 4:4409 ,toweeei"›, tett- /-62441-1-€ deb L gtet- p- - / 441-44°"' utaado gtt:tia, 6,0 tf-cleri eke . Mee--t euia4ow2 - iaW;e 4: itae Aaa fact DATE: l c3/--5/ SIGNAT RE OF 'IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 The proposed development of this area gives great concern to the Police Departmeit for the following reasons. 1) Roadways now existing cannot handle the large influx of traffic that this project will generate. 2) Accessibility to the area will greatly hamper the law enforcement task due to the deep ravine and no motor vehicle crossings from one group of buildings to the other. SCENERIO° Officer A is charged with the responsibility of providing police services to the R-7 and is in the easterly-most group of condos when he receives a call to the westerly group. He must exit the area via SE 100th to Union and then to Sunset tc, NE 12th to Kirkland Avenue NE to Jefferson and the entrance to the westerly portion of the project. I feel that this is entirely unrealistic and places both the officers and citizens in an undue hazardous situation. If this project becomes a reality, I will recommend that an additional patrol vehicle be manned and placed in. service in the Highlands area. This will necessiti°.te 42 additional officers (to cover 24 hours) a vehicle and all equipment.. 0455N FINAL DEL.,,ARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE v- tE_...,.ION) Applice:ion No(s):R-014-84. PPUD-015-84 Environ nental Checklist No.: ECF-014-84 Descrip::ion of Proposal: Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, R-2 and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium devel- opment having 185 housing units. This revised application is to be constructed in two phase. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek. Proponent: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal: Property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on February 8. April 25, June 13 and July 11, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton. Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock. Robert Bergstrom. Gene Williams, Jerry Lind, and others. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-01.1-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Bob Tomberg and Mick C. Santa, dated January 11, 1984. 2. Applications: Rezone (R-014-84) and Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPUD-015-84). 3. F evised plans received April 16, 1984 and July 11, 1984. 4. F ecommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning C epartment, Utilities Engineering Division, Parks and Recreation Department, Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1.Tie project has been reduced in scale from 185 units to 99 units all located on the south side of Honey Creek. 2.Access to the subject project shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E., N.E. 2 .st Street, and N.E. 23rd Street. N.E. 23rd Street shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City from the project's west property line to Harrington Place N.E. Jefferson Avenue shall be extended northward to connect with N.E. 23rd S reet and shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City. Any additional property remaining west of the Jefferson Avenue extension shall also be dedicated along with said street. SIGNATIJRES: Ronald G. Nelson Michael Pam ss Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: July 16, 1984 APPEAL. DATE: July 30, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION No(s ) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY PUD IPPUD-035 84) PROPONENT: HONEY CREEK ASSOUATEB PROJECT TITLE: SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF Brie : Description of Project : PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON: APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DF,VELOPMF HAVING 99 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE VTC TNTTY OF TRF 22nn RLOC1 CIF JZI EPSON AVENUE N.B. SITE AREA: 48. 5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross ) : N/A DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : 30% IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : x 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: x 3 ) water & Water Courses :x 4 ) Plant Life: x 5) Lnimal Life: x 6 ) Noise : x 7) Light & Glare:x 8 ) Land Use; North: UNDEVELOPED PARK East : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL South: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL West : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: MINOR 9) Natural Resources : 10) Risk of Upset : 11) Population/Employment :X 12) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 782 ADT (7.9 TRIPS/UNIT X 99 UNITS) Traffic Impacts : MINOR 14 ) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) utilities : 17) Human Health: 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : Ronald G. Nelson Michael arness Building & Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor PUBLISHED: JULY 16, 1984 Ri h<rd C. Houghto APPEAL DATE: JULY 30, 1984 PIblic Works Director) OF RA, 4 gS o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT g RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z .JL MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O P 9 FO SEI'1ces0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYC R February 13, 1985 Honey C3 eek Associates 5611 119 .h S.E., Suite 2 Bellevue; WA 98006 Re: Honey Creek Rezone & Planned Unit Development, File R 114 84, PPUD- 115- 84; P]operty Located at 2000 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Dear Sir: : The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 27, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for February 19, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, 644z,., Roger J Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMN6:c1 1334Z OF R4,- 1/ c) z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT waL' RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR NLL p U MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 co- 09 T"D SEC - BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 13, 1985 Thomas A . Johnson 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, WA 98055 Re: Hcney Creek Rezone & Planned Unit Development, File R- 114- 84, PPUD- 115. 84; Property Located at 2000 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.B. Dear Mr. Johnson: The City. of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 27, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for FEbruary 19, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The appl.cant or representatives) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any ques' ions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235 2550. Sincerel}, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RIB:JMM:el 1334Z ATTACHMENT 1 TOTAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE SOUTH 346 FEET OF THE:NORTH 1131.4 FEET OF THE EAST 555.64 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; ALSO THE SOUTH 393.2 FEET OF THE WEST 555.64 FEET OF THE EAST 1111.28 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE NORTH 292.7 FEET OF THE WEST 554.64 FEET THEREOF; ALSO THE SOUTH 292.7 FEET OF THE NORTH 1078 FEET OF THE WEST 554.64 FEET OF THE EAST 1111.28 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; ALSO THE SOUTH 27 FEET OF THE NORTH 785.4 FEET OF THE WEST 554.64 FEET THE EAST 1111.28 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD; ALSO THE SOUTH 392.7 FEET OF THE NORTH 785.4 FEET OF THE WEST 555.64FEET OF THE EAST 1111.28 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; EXCEPT THE SOUTH 27 FEET OF THE WEST 554.64 FEET THEREOF ALL IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT FROM ALL OF THE FOREGOING: THAT PORTION OF THE EAST 1111.28 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING WESTERLY OF 120TH PLACE S.E. AND NORTHERLY OF S.E. 97TH STREET; AND ALSO THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; EXCEPT PORTION LYING NORTH OF LINE BEGINNING ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, 1131.4 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE WEST TO POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 1132 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; EXCEPT PORTION LYING WITHIN S.E. 97TH STREET, ALL IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT 120TH PLACE S.E. AND THE AREA ENCLOSED BETWEEN ITS WESTERLY MARGIN AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE PROPERTY HERETOFORE DESCRIBED; SAID EXCEPTED AREA COMPRISES APPROXIMATELY 0.83 ACRES. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CITY OF REN T ON FEB 121985 — J RU)LDINGiZONIni ; DEPT. PARCEL A COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY; THENCE N 1 16` 00" E A DISTANCE OF 1039. 75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 57 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 317. 77 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 80 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 321 . 70 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 31 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 323. 15 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 23 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 710. 73 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 200. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 88 degrees 15 minutes 36 seconds East a distance of 500. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 392. 58 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 88 degrees 17 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 555. 64 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 475.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 703235 square feet or 16. 1441 acres of land, more or less. C Tv0pRENTON 07 1FEB ' ^ BU|LU|NGRO0/MG MT. PARCEL B COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY THENCE N 1 16^ 00" E A DISTANCE OF 124' 70 FEET ; TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 88 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 278.41 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 08 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 510. 45 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 56 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 448. 09 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 759. 70 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 209402 square feet or 4. 8072 acres of land, more or less. CnvCF RcwTON U u u FEB A u c, "* BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. PARCEL D COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY; THENCE N 88 19 45 W A DISTANCE OF 444.47 FEET: THENCE N 11 08' 29" W A DISTANCE OF 181 . 55 FEET; THENCE N 81 08' 29"W A DISTANCE OF 98. 20 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 81 degrees 08 min' tes 29 seconds West a distance of 400. 44 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 45 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 160. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 03 degrees 23 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 486. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 275.83 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 32 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 499. 09 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 51 minutes 31 seconds West a distance of 232. 97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 261330 square feet or 5. 9993 acres of land, more or less. CiTvCFREN ON U O | U ' FEB1 iOA u ^ wv BU|LD|NG/ZON/NGDEPT. PARCEL C COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY; THENCE N 88 19' 45" W A DISTANCE OF 444. 47 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE North 11 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 181 . 55 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 81 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 498. 63 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 45 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 160. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 03 degrees 23 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 486. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 106. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 09 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 104. 29 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 45 degrees 38 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 343. 36 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 51 minutes 31 seconds West a distance of 1169. 80 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 88 degrees 19 minutes 25 seconds East a distance of 843. 90 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 351317 square feet or 8. 0651 acres of land, more or less. CITY OFRE0TON 0 - 9 VV FEB BU(LD/NG/ZON|NGUEPT, C PARCEL E UU 1 w ^ --- BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PROPERTY: BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. THENCE North 88 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 278. 41 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 08 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 510. 45 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 56 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 448. 09 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 155' 35 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 57 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 317. 77 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 80 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 321 . 70 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 31 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 323. 15 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 23 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 710. 73 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 200. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 88 degrees 15 minutes 36 seconds West a distance of 55' 64 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 01 degrees 16 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 738' 80 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 88 degrees 17 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 185. 43 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 45 degrees 38 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 343. 36 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 09 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 104. 29 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 89 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 169. 83 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 32 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 499. 09 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 00 degrees 51 minutes 31 seconds West a distance of 232. 97 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 81 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 98. 20 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 11 degrees 08 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 181 . 55 feet to a point for corner; THENCE South 88 degrees 19 min' tes 25 seconds East a distance of 445. 00 feet to a point for corner; THENCE North 01 degrees 01 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 124. 75 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT 120TH PLACE S. E. AND THE AREA ENCLOSED BETWEEN ITS WESTERLY MARGIN AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE TOTAL PROPERTY HERETOFORE DESCRIBED; SAID EXCEPTED AREA COMPRISES APPROXIMATELY 0. 83 ACRES. CONTAINING 552530 SQUARE FEET OR 12. 70 ACRES MORE OR LESS. CI TvCFR EN 7 U | R UV h F; FEB1w wv BU/LD|NG/ZON/NG DEPT. JOI-IN GR®l1APlDESIGN 1NC. I t lFC OF 'IMUSRI UT-G\L 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 200 RE NTON, WASHINGTON 98055 DATE JOB NO. fie(, i, 1q es eii --¢7 RENTON 271-7200 SEATTLE 623-5732 ATTENTION /{ y.)///- Iv`t/ (/ RE I ' t 1 0/4y f(c)(` TO A, e Iarf, c'L t// 1/ rCin41 Cif- rker? crl) Ircky WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shcp drawings Prints Plans Samples Li Specifications Cory of letter Change order COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION a. F V'o - o <k- "7- ?i 1 I v Oa_ ors tea. ? y Seri i-10 I P L- iG on THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution i As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 3 CiTY OF- huq,(7.1T ,_ ,.. 7.,,,.‘ L...t F EB 121985 BU1i_DING/70Nur\r, OF-PT. COPY TO Irk/e F 7L- 'l--, SIGNED: 3Ve t PRODUCT2143 /nreaJInc..Groton,Km 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. 1306L NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENT ON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINEE: AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON 1HE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON F EBRUARY 19, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. 1 0 CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:ii HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Applications for joint land use actions to: 1) Rezone 47.7 acres of property from G-1, General, to R-1, Residential - Single Family, and R-2, Residential - Two r Family, file R-014-84; and 2) approval of a Preliminary P.U.D. for a two-phase multi-family development consisting of 185 dwelling units, file PPUD-015-84. A. The first 3hase of the P.U.D., located on the south side of Honey Creek, will consist of 99 dwelling units; property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of s Jefferson Avenue N.E. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTEREST ED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 19, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR fir, OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: February 8, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson g Building and Zoning Director 1 CERTIFICATION it I, JEANETTE SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIVE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN FIVE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. i G ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a l' Notary Publ, in and for the State of Washington residing in on the 6th day of F bruary, 19 5. 4:,. ....44 t SIGNED:Q i- r; 1 1 i 4 i 9 j 6( 11 i 'S F OF RA-: y. 94r D SEQt Oe City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON --HRJA3Y 19, 1985 BEGINNING AT 9:0 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 X REZONE From G-1 TO R-1, R-2 SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM X PRELIMINARY PUD FOR 185 DWELLING UNITS IN A MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION E] SIGNIFICANT J NON-SIGNIFICANT F014 FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF RFC y © ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z a 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09gr6.0 3EPZ° 4'OP BARBARA (. SHINPOCH M/,YOR January 31, 1985 Mel Eas ter Johnson and Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue South Suite 9,C 0 Renton, WA 98055 RE: Santa Tomberg P.U.D./Revised Submission R-014-64, pPLAD -OiS'Y1q- Dear Mr. Easter: Pursuant to our conversation of last week, I have re-evaluated the situation and believe that it would be easier to consider an adjustment in the rezone request rather than in the Preliminary Planned Unit Development. The rezone request must be accompanied by specific legal descriptions showing those areas tc be rezoned. .In this case, I would advise you to modify the Assessor's map that you sub•nitted to relocate five acres of proposed R--2 zoning to the mid level plateau lying in the southwest corner of the subject site. The 2.1 acres that have slopes over 15% in the southwest corner should be rezoned into an R- 1 classification. The ravine itself, which lies to the north and east of the R. 2 area, should be designated G- 1 for General Use. Basically, this area is a greenbelt. The other R. 1 areas would lie to the northeast and east of the Phase I development area. I also believe that the figures can be modified slightly to assure that you come into the same final development density of 185 units as initially proposed. In calculating the final density )f the P.U.D., you must eliminate that property that will be dedicated for the extension of Jefferson Avenue N.E. along with connections from N.E. 21st Street and N.E. 23rd Street. Mel Easter January 31, 1985 Page 2 Also, it is my understanding that we will prepare the exhibits for presentation during the public hearing except for the revised Assessor's maps including the appropriate legal descr.ptions and one colored drawing of the preliminary P.U.D. map, which your office will provide. If I can be of any further assistance, please call me immediately. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:1?95Z:wr OF R4, Q ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O9 TFD .EPS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 24, 1985 TO: Planning and Development Committee FROMVI:/?"-5 Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Honey Creek Annexation/Concurrent Rezone and P.U.D. Applications The City Council in 1983, adopted a policy that allowed an applicant to submit a joint annexat..on and rezone application. Subsequently, the City received an application to annex, rezone, and review a preliminary planned unit development from Honey Creek Associates. There was confusion on whether the City Council had agreed to such a policy and to what extent development plans could be reviewed. The City Council minutes of March 5th and 19th of last year appear to state that concurrent applications could be considered by the Hearing Examiner at one public hearing. However, what the minutes actually state is that the Council approved the recommendation of the Policy Development Department. There is no clear policy statement by the City Council on this issue. The Hez ring Examiner has questioned what authority to consider a development project outside -)f the city limits. I have referred him to the minutes, but it would be better if a definite policy was made by the Council. ISSUE: In addition, the general policy concerning development review prior to annexation should be made. In effect, what land use issues can the Hearing Examiner or Board of Public Works, cr Board of Adjustment consider before annexation? R EC OM!AENDATION: The Building and Zoning Department believes that all land use reviews could be considered and conditioned upon annexation. These would specifically include decisions by: 1) the Hearing Examiner, 2) the City Council, and 3) the Board of Public Works. Actions such as rezones, site plan approvals, special permits for fill and grade, preliminary plats, short plats, variances, and preliminary planned unit developments could be considered before annexation. O F R E4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT U `/ RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z o 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co 0 SEPSE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM January 22, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Roger73N/9j J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Santa/Tomberq Rezone and PUD/Concurrent Hearings After Uncovering our potential problem with hearing both the Preliminary PUD and the Rezone proposal for the Honey Creek Annexation area at one hearing, our department investicated the original authority which allowed Building and Zoning Department to receive both applications. On March 5, 1984, after a request by the applicants, the City Council considered review of the Planned Unit Development and the Rezone together. Oral presentations were submitted to the Council by Dave Clemens, Policy Development Director; and the Council on March 19th established a policy for concurrent applications. Therefore, in this specific case, joint applications are appropriate. In the meantime, the applicant has submitted a second letter to the City Council requesting confirmation of their ability to submit both applications and be considered by the City Council in one process. The City Council has now scheduled that item before the Planning and Development Committee on Thursday, January 24th. The Building and Zoning Department will be able to present a total discussion concerning the merits of the Rezone and Planned Unit Development for the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing scheduled for February 19, 1985. Both legal notices and general vicinity postings will be redone for the public hearing plus notifying the three individuals that appeared at the first public hearing. RJB:1269Z:wr OF R 0 THE CITY OF RENTON y41010 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ovia rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 9' O co CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500o9 TEO :EPSE O P January 18, 1985 Bob Tomberg, DDS PS 5611-119th SE, Suite #2 i3e11evue, WA 98006-3799 Re: Honey Creek Associates Request for PUD Application. Gear Dr. Tomberg: it its regular meeting of January 14, 1985, the Renton City Council referred your request to its Planning and Development Committee for review and report back to the entire Council . A meeting has been tentatively scheduled on January 31 , 1985 at 4:30 p.m. to dicuss this matter. Please contact the Council Secretary at 235-2586 to confirm the time and date of the meeting. She can be reached Heekdays from 1 :00 to 5:00 p.m. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON M,rxine E. Motor City Clerk cc.: Building & Zoning Department Hearing Examiner Council President OF J A. THE CITY OF RENTON vgi MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ois ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AOr P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 YiTEO EEP1'. MEMORANDUM DATE: January 10, 1985 TO: ROGER BLAYLOCK, ZONING ADMINISTRATV I • FROM: FRED KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER i l/ SUBJECT: PPUD, HONEY CREEK As I reviewed your memorandum of January 9, 1985 I realized the range of matters which had been scheduled for the January 15, 1985 hearing. I believe, if reference is made to Section 4-2707, you will find that this office lacks extraterritorial jurisdiction to entertain a PPUD for property not now currently lying within tie boundaries of the City of Renton. That section provides that "Planned unit devoloprients shall be permitted in any zone within the City..." The subject site is not within the City. I realize the City, through state enabling law, can reclassify property which is subject to a proposed annexation, but unless documentation can be provided which indicates the City can also affect a Planned Unit Development extraterritorially, I will not entertain the PPUD ur til annexation is completed. cc: Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Ron Nelson, Building and Zoning Director City Clerk OF J THE CITY OF RENTON t$ 4- 'Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n rn o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER pA FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235 -2593 09q D .3EPj0, 0 i.r' "4:N7C.i'g MEMORANDUM i; t' V £\17 I JAN 10 1985 DATE: January 10, 1985 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. TO: ROGER BLAYLOCK, ZONING ADM1NISTRAT•4" FROM: FRED KAUFMAN, HEARING EXAMINER SUBJEC1: PPUD, HONEY CREEK As I reviewed your memorandum of January 9, 1985 1 realized the range of matters which had bees scheduled for the January 15, 1985 hearing. I believe, if reference is made to Section 4-2707, you will find that this office lacks extraterritorial jurisdiction to entertain a PPUD for property not now currently lying within the boundaries of the City of Renton. 1 hat section provides that "Planned unit developments shall be permitted in any zone within the City..." The subject site is not within tie City. I realize, the City, through state enabling law, can reclassify property which is subject to a proposed annexation, but unless documentation can be provided which indicates the City can also affect a Planned Unit Development extraterritorially, I will not entertain the PPUD until annexation is completed. cc: Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Ron Nelson, Building and Zoning Director City Clerk OF R4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR o 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 235-2540 co- 9 BARBARA v. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: JANUARY 9, 1985 TO: FRED J . KAUFMAN, LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ROGER J. BLAYLOCK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR RE. ONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT R-014-84 AND PPUD-015-84 The Building and Zoning Department can not comply with Section 4-3012 of Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance and provide a staff report to the Hearing Examiner the required seven (7) days before the scheduled public hearing. At the time of preparation of the final report, it was discovered that three major errors existed. First, the applications include property that was not included in the annexation. Both the rezone and P.U.D. applications were not reduced in area after the annexation was revised. Secondly, the plans do not reflect the ERC' s decision to require dedication of Jefferson Ave. N.E. along the western property line. Lastly and probably the most serious problem is that the dwelling unit count that the Building and Zoning Department has just calculated under the P.U.D. process is approximately one-half of what the developer and the Policy Development Director calculated in early 1984. We can not find the documentation that supported the final decision to have the applicant apply for a P.U.D. with 185 dwelling units. since the application should be substantially revised, we request that the public hearing be continued until February 19th or 26th. This could allow review time and legal notice time by reposting the property and new advertisements in the Record Chronicle. OF R4, 1 A. 4 ) ° zx BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 P MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09q* FQ SEPSc‘ A BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR January 2, 1985 Thomas A. Johnson 304 Main Avenue S., Suite 200 Renton, W A 98055 Re: Honey Creek Rezone and Planned Unit Development, File R-114-84, PPL,D-115-84; Property Located at the 2000 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Dear Mr. Johnson: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 27, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for January 15, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questicns, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, f,lp, (9 ,---X Ut4t ), TA_ Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1231Z of R4, 44, 0BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT A t , crne =;- RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9, 0 co- 0, 9q).. 1 SEPjE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR January 2, 1985 Honey Creek Associates 5611 119th S.E., Suite 2 Bellevue, WA 98006 Re: Honey Creek Rezone and Planned Unit Development, File R-114-84, PPUD-115-84; Property Located at the 2000 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Dear S rs: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 27, 1984. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land L'se Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for January 15, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any quE stions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, c----- eel...9.-----T Let,- Roger .1]. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:cl 1231Z-2. 1227Z-1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 15, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a building having 74.400 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse use, file SA-112-84, and application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the placement of 26,063 cubic yards of material for preload and the building pad, file SP-113-84; located between S.W. 27th Street and S.W. 29th Street and midway between Lind Avenue S.W. and East Valley Road. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1. R-1, and R-2, file R-014-84, and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium development having 185 housing units, file PPUD-015-84. This revised application is to be constructed in two phases. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek; property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 15, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : January 4, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-McKAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1HREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in an for the State of Washington residing in on the lie Yi day 4of J nuary, 19 5. 149-1,"<, r r SIGNED: u ri..e.it..5-- 4<L)-)-hcl- Ar_, OF 6 z 09Q 09 9 fO SEPSE0v, City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC EA1111110 in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS . CITY HALL ON JANUARY 15, 1985 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: FILES R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 x REZONE From G-1. TO G-L R-1, R-2 El SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lots X PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIIANCE FROM GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N,E, LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 0 SIGNIFICANT NON—SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY Orin RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION RENT IUILDING & ZONING DEPOi RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION Eli FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED Iv APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I] NOT APPROVED OL PL/C//t)T $,' u L ate' if.}-T T/r` E'_GtJUuL 6 tJy r f' D/u P6frf A7 G - J7J,9S m /N TA//t) ry S/ Tf LJE /Vd9TI/Jen L e G T //0/v4r-f-Rez7r fiocv /926- 6o/.tie To Do Tjf/s EIS L-F-Ing 1 7 ,C ,C tgggigrie /-, A-/ 7-i-.9/ 5' YS iCarr 6 Pe:-(A) Ta g/v/ l C SL- L G / e Gam/ 7rrG'"yT 77C4lL S ns/<Gr7"/, t L u29's s//JvGo ee-- fri?o c//IJL'Z? DN - S To n9 / T/G,17r /inmer oAI ,Vthi ,//6//1405 1 lac c/( 6ttA4- ewi i2, G.cr ! — DATE: ro1rl - S'4 SIGNATURE OF DIR CT OR AUTHORIZED rEPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENTVPUILDING & ZONING DEP ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO C-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 n ENGINEERING DIVISION in TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ei PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : our,/ El APPROVED FTAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT T01 LATE COMERS AGREEMENT WATER N Jt_nnis0,v,lu LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER go M SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE WATER Y&$ I-7S-7L4NIT 1 J k/ J ( JD SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE SEWER GS 175—/uw`7P Kl S SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER WO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHANGE SEWER 1.10 Cb.40-. A ur' 14 APPROVED WATER PLAN y65 JN6'` 6"1 Ua' `',k t_ ,r is R APPROVED c i.??R PLAN qei APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS y65 BY FIRE DEPT. FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS 62i7 DATE :1 P- SIGNATURE OF 'PIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE g'iVf REVISION 5/19 : Form 182 RENTC JILDING & ZONING DEPAFONT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO L;-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 MENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 5-71,: j El APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 29 NOT APPROVED wtri 72e-- „. 9''Z4 .t V, 4, /, ( -rr z//6/e DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 INTEROFFICE41° 40° MEMO TO: DATE: t/l)C IIV .1IUG, APRIL 19, 1984 FROM: JERRY LIND, ZONING DIVISION SUBJECT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE & PRELIMINARY PUD FILES: R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 Our department received the attached revised Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. site plan as required by the Environmental Review Committee. All development within the first plase of the project is to be sited on the south side of the creek. This plan calls for 99 units to be located on the south side and 86 units to be located on the north side in a future development phase. Please review and comment on this plan at your earliest convenience. This project will be rescheduled for ERC review on Wednesday, April 25th. c;5v( RENTO UILDING & ZONING DEPAF ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT ; HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE ;SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO C-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 n ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I roierc L G wC-M 11JG n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED fG' P.,, C DATE : '4/. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 1011 00) REZONE SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. R-014-84/PPUD-015-84 As part of the traffic analysis we would like the following information: 1 . NE 23rd Street between Harrington Place NE and the proposed development site shows a right-of-way width of 20 feet. Our question is, is this not a more direct route in and out of the development site? If so, can the 20-foot right-of-way be expanded to 50 feet to match the existing roadway on NE 23rd St .? 2. NE 21st Street between the development site and the west end of . tax lot 134 shows only a 30-foot right-of-way.` Fifty feet is needed for a complete roadway entrance from Harrington Place. Please address this problem. 3. All access roads to the development site are to be fully improved curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting, etc. ) . Confirm provisions for accesses at 122nd Ave. SE, SE 100th St. , Jefferson Ave. NE, 21st Ave. NE or NE 23rd St. and show the limits of the access improvements . RENTIOUILDING & ZONING DEPPOENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO -1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N,E, TO : I ( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 OENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT E1BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ErNOT APPROVED S o' -s/'e/G TOZ , r't-/C._ AR/a1 - DATE : , ' 7iy SIGNATURE OF DIR OR AUTHOR ZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENT UILDING & ZONING DEP/ ...ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 014 - 84 JAN 3 1984 REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-MFST POLICY 0FPT.APPLICATION NO(S) . PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO -1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I ( APPROVED N1APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ] NOT APPROVED S4,1eF.fiteia,*(0.441.0 2 10 DATE : CAS/87 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTiR SR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 OF R4, o THE CITY OF RENTON t POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 z ma n0 rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 9, 0 c. 0, 1tFU SEP1 ,,!\ BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR CITY OE RENTON ir! CO P, ii WI DATE: April 25, 1984 D APR 2 5 1984 TO: Environmental Review Committee BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, FROM: Policy Development Department SUBJECT: Revised Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. Site Plan In the initial review of this proposed Rezone/Planned Unit Development, the Environmental Review Committee was advised by several City departments that additional information would be necessary in the following areas: 1. Water, Water Courses 2. Traffic Impacts 3. Public Services (especially Fire) 4. Utilities 5. Recreation A revised plan addressing some of these concerns was submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on April 16, 1984. Based upon review of this plan, the following observations can be made: No development should be permitted on the east side of Honey Creek for five 5) years or until the City can provide water, sewer, and public safety services, whichever occurs first. 12.egarding traffic, approximately 782 Average Daily Trips can be expected to result from this first phase development. Traffic as such should not be a major problem. However, the specific access points and range of improvements must be stipulated. elated to traffic, the Fire Department has expressed concern about apparent ingular access to the southwest portion of the site from N.E. 21st Street and efferson Avenue N.E. The revised site plan submitted indicates an emergency access extending south from the end of the proposed cul-de-sac to Kirkland Place N.E. An easement for this access must be secured and properly improved. RENT. JILDING & ZONING DEPA NT ie . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 -- 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBER;; P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 l iENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UT:LITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 154 POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS I INOT APPROVED 74 446 44441 4,0adeei Azu-t 4vidie ec.a..44,te„e teA:t-rAt-e,r-t-e a"1-44 . HAeV; / 4111*" j44, azz'a %out rakt 04-44- Iry te,(2.m. DATE ' 1-3/---$l SIGNAT RE OF/OrIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 The proposed development of this area gives great concern to the Police Departmert for the following reasons. 1) Roadways now existing cannot handle the large influx of traffic that this project will generate. 2) Accessibility to the area will greatly hamper the law enforcement task due to the deep ravine and no motor vehicle crossings from one group of buildings to the other. SCENERIO: Officer A is charged with the responsibility of providing police services to the R-7 and is in the easterly-most group of condos when he receives a call to the westerly group. He must exit the area via SE 100th to Union and then to Sunset to NE 12th to Kirkland Avenue NE to Jefferson and the entrance to the westerly portion of the project. I feel that this is entirely unrealistic and places both the officers and citizens in an undue hazardous situation. If this project becomes a reality, I will recommend that an additional patrol vehicle be manned and placed in service in the Highlands area. This will necessitate 42 additional officers (to cover 24 hours) a vehicle and all equipment. Renton City Council December. 17, 1984 Page two Maplewood Golf MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THE MATTER Course Acquisition OF ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF MAPLEWOOD Continued GOLF COURSE BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER LEGISLATION . CARRIED. CONSEN t AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Item 5f removed MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, ITEM 5f BE see below) REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Scott Annexation City Clerk submitted notice from Boundary Review Board Approval officially approving the Scott Annexation, 11-acre parcel situated on both sides of Sunset Boulevard NE in the vicinity of Union Avenue NE. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Claim for Damages Claim for damages in the amount of $259.71 filed by Henry I . Henry K le Kyle, 1140 Edmonds Avenue NE #213, for automobile damages sustained when he hit a deep pothole near 1107 SW Grady Way, alleging neglect of roadway by the City (11/20/84) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim for Damages Claim for damages in the amount of $98.31 filed by Tim J. Tim Walker Walker, 1919 Talbot Road South, for expenses from plugged sewer drain allegedly caused by clogged City side sewer 12/09/84) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Lincoln Froperties Hearing Examiner recommended approval with restrictive Rezone covenants of Lincoln Properties Rezone, File #R-073-84, 1 .8 File #R-(i73-84 acres east of Lake Washington Boulevard North at the 2000 block, from R-1 to R-3. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Court Case Court case filed by Frank Bean, 777 - 106th Avenue NE, William aid Bellevue, attorney for William A. and Alice M. Clarke, in the Alice Clarke amount of $15, 000± for landscape damage allegedly caused by improper dirt removal from adjacent property by the City 11 /14/84) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Railroad Signals , Public Works/Traffic Engineering Department requested Pavemen.; Warning resolution authorizing application for 90% Federal funds for Marking Funding railroad signals and pavement warning markings at Wells see later action) Avenue South/Houser Way South; Bronson Way North/Houser Way North to Sunset Boulevard North; and Burlington Northern Industrial Park. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. LID #330 Public Works Department submitted proposed Local Improvement SW Grady Way District #330, street and utility improvements on SW Grady Way from Lind Avenue SW from Lind Avenue SW to Longacres Drive SW, and requested to Longa :res public hearing be set for January 14, 1985. Refer to Ways and Drive SW Means Committee. (see later action) Consent Agenda MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT Approved THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Police/Fire Civil Removed item: Mayor Shinpoch reappointed Donald Holm, 1015 Service Commission Tacoma Avenue NE, and Margaret Proctor, 4124 NE Tenth Place, Reappointments to the Police/Fire Civil Service Commission for six-year terms effective to December 31, 1990. Other members of the Commission include: Louis Barei, Norma Jean Cugini, and Barbara Little. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION TO REAPPOINT MRS. PROCTOR AND MR. HOLM TO THE FIRE/POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION . CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Utilities Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Utilities Committee recommending concurrence in the recommendation of the Public Honey Creek Works Department to submit grant application and to authorize JnterceptQr Project the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the grant application. MOVED Funding BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT DECEMBER 17, 1984 Honey :reek Interceptor Project Funding (Referred 12-10-84) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Public Works ) epartment to submit grant application and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk I:o sign the grant application. Request for Latecomer Agreement by Dean Bitney (Referred 11-5-84) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the Public Works Department 's recommmdation to deny the request due to its untimeliness. rh-i‘Otkz_ws Nancy Mathes , Chairman 7/?0,,,t Kathy Ce ker 1_2j/77 Thomas Trimm OF ay , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 96055 vq 206 235-2569 g' ED ..EP-W° BARBARA ` . SHINPOCH December 7, 1984 MAYOR E) oN Mr. Bob TombergI5611119thS.E. DEC 7 1984 "'J Bellevue, WA 98066 SUBJECT: Santa/Tomberg, Honey Creek Assoc. PUD Dear Mr. Tomberg: This letter is to try and clarify the situation that presently exists ref. N.E. 23rd Street access to your PUD project. If you will recall our original decision made it difficult for you to neogtiate with the owner of the south one-half of the proposed N.E. 23rd Street. We now have revised that decision and you will be able to proceed with your project because it does not hinge on that acquisition. However, if your negotiations now are unsatisfactory, we would be willing to pursue condemnation so that the south one-half can be constructed as originally agreed upon. Please keep us informed of the status of these negotiations. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton ` J Public Works Director F,C H:pmp cc: Ron Nelson Roger Blalock Pat Prewitt I OF RA, y BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT t RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z . o o 'MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o 235-2540 90 0' O9 rE0 SE PI BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH December 5, 1984 MAYOR Mel 1=aster Johnson and Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue S., Suite 200 Renton, WA 90055 Re: Santa/Tomberg PUD (Honey Creek Associates), Files R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 Dear Mr. Easter: The Environmental Review Committee has considered the access proposal specifically submitted on November 20, 1984, as to it compliance with the specific conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in their Declaration of Nonsignificance dated July 16, 1984. They did find that your proposed emergency access on the present aligr,ment on N.E. 23 Street did meet the intent of their original decision which specifically stated that N.E. 23rd Street shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the :Jity from the projects west property line to Harrington Place N.E. However, they do wan'.. to point out that Jefferson Avenue N.E. shall be extended northward to connect with N.E. 23rd Street and shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City for a standards street. Your specific plans dated November 20, 1984, show it as a driveway. That is specifically not acceptable to the Environmental Review Committee. This letter is to clarify the fact that that roadway shall meet minimum City standards including curbs, gutters, and a walkway on one side, with appropriate street lighting. In addition, the pavement should be a maximum of 32 feet. The intent of the ERC was to allow the Public Works Department final design approval prior to the submission of the final PUD. Please be aware that this is only a clarification of the original letter and the appeal date of December 8, 1984, is still valid. Appeals must be submitted to the Land Use Hearing Examiner under the old policies for any environmental decision issued before October 1, 198,4. The appeals must be in writing and submitted under the specific procedures of Section 4--3014. If I can provide any further assistance, I would be happy to meet with either yourself or the proponents during the next two days. Sincerely, UA- Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJE3:1209Z:c1 JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering &planning consultants November 16, 1984 Mr. Richard Houghton Director of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 Re: Santa Tomberg Our Project #83-47 Emergency Access Mr. Houghton: Enclosed please find a drawing depicting our proposed emergency access for N.E. 23rd street to the Santa Tomberg site. I believe that you have spoken with Mr. Tomberg and will now review this proposal in the next environmental review committee meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. incerely, 1.1r.NS AUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. die If eg 1A. liener, P.E.CITY 4F F .:7 3l•1 GAD:smb 1121 II WI NOV 201984 cc: Bob Tomberg w/enclosure i.cel.SJj1 ]id ay . r LILT i Architecture, Enginccring &Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L.Allwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 206)271-7200 (206)623-5732 BOB TOMBERG. D.D.S. CITY OV I<`E°'S 'ON 5611 119rH S. E. Qi i+ 3 rt3 [1 \yj 1 , BELLEVUE, WASH. 98006il 1 [ 746-6554 I J E C 21 1984 November 2, 1984 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Rich rd C. Houghton Director of Public ';forks Municipal Bldg. 200 •Aill Ave. South Ren on, Wa. 98055 Dea Dick: I am writing to request a re-evaluation of the Honey Creek Associates proposed P.U.D. based on a review of the progress we have made thus far and in light of our current impass. Your environmental review committee initially requested in its 'original declaration of non-significance dated 6-18-84 tha we modify our original proposal to provide additional eme gency access to our parcel as well as the major access poi t at Jefferson Street. Vie submitted a drawing indicating emergency access at Kirkland Place which your committee accepted as adequate. As we evaluated that access point we ' found it to be beyond the scope of our construction abilities due to a grading problem. Vie then presented four alternative emergency access points for the committee' s review. Your res onse to those alternatives has a new declaration of non- si ificance dated 7-16-84 requiring an additional major access point at Twenty-third street and to suggest we explore the' feasability of acquiring the additional right of way needed to complete the south one half of Twenty-third street which the city does not own. e complied by contacting Mr. James Chandler who is the owner of the parcel to the south of Twenty-third street. At this time he has no interest in dedicating his portion of Twenty- third street to the city or selling said portion to us. His only interest is to sell the entire parcel for an unreasonable cash only figure with no contingencies. We are financially unable to meet his demands. At this point I no longer feel we can consider Twenty-third street as a major access point to our parcel although emergency access there is still a possibility. It is possible other alternatives to acquire the! street may become available at some time but I feel none are likely in the near future. I believe we are wasting much precious time by exploring options not available to us at present. Your second declaration of non-significance dated 7-16-84 requiring a second major access point is not consistant with y:ur original declaration requiring one major and one emer- gency access route. It is in fact substantially different from both of our original planning efforts and now seriously impacts the project. We believe we all agree this P.U. D./Rezone process should proceed in a timely fashion, and that acquisition of additional right of way may take 6 months to 6 years or longer. Consequently I have instructed the Johnson/Braund Design Group to provide you again with additional emergency access alternatives as you requested in your original declaration of nbn significance. VJe stand ready to meet with your singlely or as a group to further delineate our position and hopefully arrive at a workable solution which is good for both the City of Renton as well as Honey Creek Associates. Please contact me at your earliest convenience. Your continued effort is deeply appreciated. Sincerely 11011117. Bob To erg, D.D.S. BT/jw OF R4,, 16 o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Zsal rn 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0941' S i Pj P BARBARA Y SHINPOCH MA-OR MEMORANDUM DATE : NOVEMBER 26, 1984 TO: OLICd1 Z)EL L>-'1 FROA: BUILDING 6< ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES) FILES : ECF-015-84, R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 The Environmental Review Committee has received a revised drawing showing emergency access for the above referenced project. Please review and comment on this latest proposal. This item will be scheduled on the ERC agenda for the November 28th meeting. CITY OF RENTON NOV 261984 POLICY DFVFl.OPM4,c1IT 1lcPT. JohnscnBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants November 16, 1984 Mr. Richard Houghton Director of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 Re: Santa Tomberg Our Project #83-47 Emergency Access Mr. 1-Ioughton: Enclosed please find a drawing depicting our proposed emergency access for N.E. 23rd street to the Santa Tomberg site. I believe that you have spoken with Mr. Tomberg and will now review this proposal in the next environmental review corn•nittee meeting. If ycu have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. ncerely, NS J LAUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. 4HJ eg A. iener, P.E. r`•' GAD:smb Fa is p }„.; \ A iii il u , L . NOV 2c) 198,1 cc: Bob Tomberg w/enclosure Egf l vt Architecture, Enginccring&Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L.Aliwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton,Washington 98055 206) 271-7200 (206)623-5732 BOB TOMBERG, D.D.S. 5811 MOTHS.OTH S. E. BELLEVUE, WASH. 08008 746-81554 Nov tuber 2, 1984 CITY OF RENiON 1UP VI DcLardC. .-;ought NOV1984 sir ctor of Public 'orko i iun' ci;o1 31dg. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 200 1.1111 Ave. South Ren on, :' a. 98055 ea Dick: I am writing to request a re-evaluation of the Honey Creek Ass :ciates proposed P.U. D. based on a review of the progress we have made thus far and in light of our current impass. Your environmental review committee initially requested in its original declaration of non-significance dated 6-18-84 that we modify our original proposal to provide additional emergency access to our parcel as well as the major access point at Jefferson Street. We submitted a drawing indicating emergency access at Kirkland Place which your committee accepted as adequate. As we evaluated that access point we ' found it to be beyond the scope of our construction abilities due to a grading problem. Vie then presented four alternative eme gency access points for the committee' s review. Your res onse to those alternatives has a new declaration of non- significance dated 7-16-84 requiring an additional major access point at Twenty-third street and to suggest we explore the feasability of acquiring the additional right of way needed to complete the south one half of Twenty-third street which the city does not own. We complied by contacting Mr. James Chandler who is the owner of the parcel to the south of Twenty-third street. At this time he has no interest in dedicating his portion of Twenty- third street to the city or selling said portion to us. His only interest is to sell the entire parcel for an unreasonable cash only figure with no contingencies. We are financially unable to meet his demands. At this point I no longer feel we can consider Twenty-third street as a major access point to our parcel although emergency access there is still a possibility. It is possible other alternatives to acquire thestreet may become available at some time but I feel none ar likely in the near future. I believe we are wasting much precious time by exploring options not available to us atipresent. wI Your econd declaration of non-significance dated 7-16-84 requi ing a second major access point is not consistant with your riginal declaration requiring one major and one emer- gency access route. It is in fact substantially different from both of our original planning efforts and now seriously impacts the project. le believe we all agree this P.U. D./Rezone process should proceed in a timely fashion, and that acquisition of additional right of way may take 6 months to 6 years or longer. Consequently I have instructed the Johnson/Braund Design Group to pr vide you again with additional emergency access alter atives. as you requested in your original declaration of no significance. Vie stand ready to meet with your singlely or as a group to further delineate our position and hopefully arrive at a workable solution which is good for both the City of Renton as well as Honey Creek Associates. Please contact me at your earliest convenience. Your continued effort is deeply appreciated. SincI- ely itT7'( /-; C:71(// ) ) Bobmberg, D.D.S. BT/j 0455N FINAL DEL.-ARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE k, . VISION) Application No(s): R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-014-84 Description of Proposal: Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1. R-1, R-2 and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium devel- opment having 185 housing units. This revised application is to be constructed in two phase. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek. Proponent: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal: Property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Lead Iogency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on February 8, April 25, June 13 and July 11, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock, Robert Bergstrom, Gene Williams, Jerry Lind, and others. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-014-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Bob Tomberg and Mick C. Santa, dated January 11, 1984. 2.Applications: Rezone (R-014-84) and Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPUD-015-84). 3. Revised plans received April 16, 1984 and July 11, 1984. 4. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Parks and Recreation Department, Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reascns for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1.The project has been reduced in scale from 185 units to 99 units all located on the south side of Honey Creek. 2.Access to the subject project shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E., N.E. 21st Street, and N.E. 23rd Street. N.E. 23rd Street shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City from the project's west property line to Harrington Place N.E. Jefferson Avenue shall be extended northward to connect with N.E. 23rd Street and shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City. Any additional property remaining west of the Jefferson Avenue extension shall also be dedicated along with said street. SIGNATURES: f/ 7 _ /t Rona:d G. Nelson Michael Parn ss Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor 1/ 2 244\Richard C. Houghton Public. Works Director PUBLISHED: July 16, 1984 APPE AL DATE: July 30, 1984 of R4,A a BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 00 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9, 0 co. 0 SEPSO O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM CITY 07 RENTON R iii !I kv.1 N DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1984 NOV 2 1984 TO: TRtFFIL E.1'v< INrERINCi - BUILDING/ZONING DE PT, FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES) FILES : ECF-015-84, R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 The Environmental Review Committee has received a revised drawing showing emergency access for the above referenced project. Please review and comment on this latest proposal. This item will be scheduled on the ERC agenda for the November 28th meeting. W C J c.,ti rr e,,.c.e.. LA) i 44 1n e p -'ro ip©se,L4 e e 4 -1-- cc.e.s S hJ e 3 r s 1- 18 s rybricise.,1 L/ -,2.0 ---4V c/-r 7.ec er I&-td 4 6 6) , 6 k'eY io we., ca I !/ G;di JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants Noy ember 16, 1984 Mr. Richard Houghton Director of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 Re: Santa Tomberg Our Project 1183-47 Emergency Access Mr. Houghton: Enclosed please find a drawing depicting our proposed emergency access for N.E. 23rd street to the Santa Tomberg site. I believe that you have spoken with Mr. Tom:)erg and will now review this proposal in the next environmental review committee meeting. If yo.i have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. ncerely, NS.i • AUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. gfr 1(1, ILA eg A. Diener, P.E.are- .> ' -`:+w1 i GAD:smb 1-0 •' 171 =' '"t cc: Bob Tomberg w/enclosure a-- t..i N O V 2 0 9844 L t; Architecture, Engineering &Planning Consultants L ence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L.Allwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 206) 271-7200 (206)623-5732 BOB TOMBERG. D.D.S. i — 78611119TH8. E. BELLEVUE,WASH. 98006 scri 746.6884 November 2, 1934 CITY 0: MBiviOPtp RicharJ C. _rou;;ht o,, NOV ( 1984 11 Director of Public 7 orko unici; o1 3ldg. RUILDING/ZONING DEPT, 200 Ni?l Ave. South Renton, a. Dear 'lick: I am writing to request a re-evaluation of the Honey Creek Associates proposed P.I . D. based on a review of the progress vie have made thus far and in light of our current impass. Your environmental review committee initially requested in its original declaration of non-significance dated 6-18-84 that vie modify our original proposal to provide additional emergency access to our parcel as well as the major access point at Jefferson Street. ; e submitted a drawing indicating emergency access at Kirkland Place which your committee accepted as adequate. As we evaluated that access point we ` found it to be beyond the scope of our construction abilities due to a grading problem. Vie then presented four alternative emergency access points for the committee' s review. Your response to those alternatives has a new declaration of non- significance dated 7-16-84 requiring an additional major access point at Twenty-third street and to suggest we explore the feasability of acquiring the additional right of way needed to complete the south one half of Twenty-third street which the city does not own. We complied by contacting Mr. James Chandler who is the owner of the parcel to the south of Twenty-third street. At this time he has no interest in dedicating his portion of Twenty- third street to the city or selling said portion to u.s. His only interest is to sell the entire parcel for an unreasonable cash only figure with no contingencies. V/e are financially unable to meet his demands. At this point I no longer feel we can consider Twenty-third street as a major access point to our parcel although emergency access there is still a possibility. It is possible other alternatives to acquire the street may become available at some time but I feel none are likely in the near future. I believe we are wasting much precious time by exploring options not available to us at present. Your second declaration of non-significance dated 7-16-84 requiring a second major access point is not consistant with your original declaration requiring one major and one emer- gency access route. It is in fact substantially different from both of our original planning efforts and now seriously impacts the project. Vie believe we all agree this P.U. D./Rezone process should proceed in a timely fashion, and that acquisition of additional right of way may take 6 months to 6 years or longer. Consequently I have instructed the Johnson/Braund Design Group to provide you again with additional emergency access alternatives, as you requested in your original declaration of non significance. Vie stand ready to meet with your singlely or as a group to further delineate our position and hopefully arrive at a workable solution which is good for both the City of Renton as well as Honey Creek Associates. Please contact me at your earliest convenience. Your continued effort is deeply appreciated. Sincerely / 7 Bob Tomberg, D.D.S. BT/j w 0455N FINAL DEL,,ARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE`.-.VISION) Application No(s): R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-014-84 Descrip:ion of Proposal:Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, R-2 and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium devel- opment having 185 housing units. This revised application is to be constructed in two phase. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek. Propon;nt: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal: Property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Lead A genes: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on February 8, April 25, June 13 and July 11, 1984, following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock. Robert Bergstrom, Gene Williams, Jerry Lind, and others. Incorp3rated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-014-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Bob Tomberg and Mick C. Santa, dated January 11. 1984. 2.Applications: Rezone (R-014-84) and Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPUD-015-84). 3.Revised plans received April 16, 1984 and July 11, 1984. 4. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Utilities Engineering Division, Parks and Recreation Department, Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reascns for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1. The project has been reduced in scale from 185 units to 99 units all located on the south side of Honey Creek. 2.Access to the subject project shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E., N.E. 2I st Street, and N.E. 23rd Street. N.E. 23rd Street shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City from the project's west property line to Harrington Place N.E. Jefferson Avenue shall be extended northward to connect with N.E. 23rd Street and shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City. Any additional property remaining west of the Jefferson Avenue extension shall also be dedicated along with said street. SIGNATURES: 1/ Ronald G. Nelson Michael Parn ss Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor 4 1,4\ Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: July 16, 1984 APPEAL DATE: July 30, 1984 pF R BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z rn 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9, 0 co o91TFD S PSE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR M E M O R A D wi i i 6 i CITr` L.. ;:fr'. i NOV 2 7 1984 DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1984 BUILDING/ZQNAC C': 'T. TO: I C; s•4 i i r--r i 11L(-i FRUA: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES) FILES: ECF-015-84, R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 The Environmental Review Committee has received a revised drawing showing emergency access for the above referenced project. Please review and comment on this latest proposal. This item will be scheduled on the ERC agenda for the November 28th meeting. rh-' ellj/ 4W-A41 .k-VtAA-A-eA---) e4.,, ,,,,„. r...IIVE 23''' t-i S 11-ett•dc/ .1,- /7,1-0--v`J- ,,,, (2-X- 0 7At--4,4/ icr-7pg-,---- /z 6/ 7 JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants November 16, 1984 Mr. Richard Houghton Director of Public Works City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Rer.ton, WA 98055 Re: Santa Tomberg Our Project #83-47 Emergency Access Mr. Houghton: Enclosed please find a drawing depicting our proposed emergency access for N.E. 23rd street to the Santa Tomberg site. I believe that you have spoken with Mr. Tomberg and will now review this proposal in the next environmental review committee meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. merely, NS. / I. • AUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. II _ rti eg A. Diener, P.E.CITY C>= " " 11 GAD:smb 6) ,c. i'n [.1 q 14.7 R . il ' i i NOV 2 0 1984 cc: Bob Tomberg w/enclosure Architecture, Engineering&Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L.Allwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 206)271-7200 (206)623-5732 BOB TOMBERG. D.D.S. 5611 119TH 8.E. BELLEVUE,WASH. 56006 746-6664 ldovember 2, 19B4 CITY OF RENIO l T,:i cbarJ C. Tous,htm NOV r 1984 Director of Public ';orks_ l_uni ci :_l cog. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT 200 1.1iJ Ave. South Renton, ";a. 98055 Dear Dick: I am writing to request a re-evaluation of the Honey Creek Associates proposed P.U. D. based on a review of the progress vie have made thus far and in light of our current impass. Your environmental review committee initially requested in its original declaration of non-significance dated 6- 18-84 that we modify our original proposal to provide additional emergency access to our parcel as well as the major access point at Jefferson Street. submitted a drawing indicating emergency access at Kirkland Place which your committee accepted as adequate. As we evaluated that access point we ` found it to be beyond the scope of our construction abilities due to a grading problem. We then presented four alternative emergency access points for the committee' s review. Your response to those alternatives has a new declaration of non- significance dated 7-16-84 requiring an additional major access point at Twenty-third street and to suggest we explore the feasability of acquiring the additional right of way needed to complete the south one half of Twenty-third street which the city does not own. Vie complied by contacting Mr. James Chandler who is the owner of the parcel to the south of Twenty-third street. At this time he has no interest in dedicating his portion of Twenty- third street to the city or selling said portion to us. His only interest is to sell the entire parcel for an unreasonable cash only figure with no contingencies. We are financially unable to meet his demands. At this point I no longer feel we can consider Twenty-third street as a major access point to our parcel although emergency access there is still a possibility. It is possible other alternatives to acquire the street may become available at some time but I feel none are likely in the near future. I believe we are wasting much precious time by exploring options not available to us at present. Your second declaration of non-significance dated 7-16-84 requiring a second major access point is not consistant with your original declaration requiring one major and one emer- gency access route. It is in fact substantially different from both of our original planning efforts and now seriously impacts the project. Vie believe we all agree this P.U. D./Rezone process should proceed in a timely fashion, and that acquisition of additional right of way may take 6 months to 6 years or longer. Consequently I have instructed the Johnson/Braund Design Group to provide you again with additional emergency access alternatives. as you requested in your original declaration of non significance. Vie stand ready to meet with your singlely or as a group to further delineate our position and hopefully arrive at a workable solution which is good for both the City of Renton as well as Honey Creek Associates. Please contact me at your earliest convenience. Your continued effort is deeply appreciated. Sincerely // Bob Tomberg, D.D.S. BT/jw REZONE SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. R-014-84/PPUD-015-84 As part of the traffic analysis we would like the following information: I . NE 23rd Street between Harrington Place NE and the proposed development site shows a right-of-way width of 20 feet. Our question is, is this not a more direct route in and out of the development site? If so, can the 20-foot right-of-way be expanded to 50 feet to match the existing roadway on NE 23rd St.? 2. NE 21st Street between the development site and the west end of tax lot 134 shows only a 30-foot right-of-way. Fifty feet is needed for a complete roadway entrance from Harrington Place. Please address this problem. 3. All access roads to the development site are to be fully improved curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting, etc. ) . Confirm provisions for accesses at 122nd Ave. SE, SE 100th St. , Jefferson Ave. NE, 21st Ave. NE or NE 23rd St. and show the limits of the access improvements . OF R4- 4 A. C 24i 4 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR Z mil N., rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 vq 206 235-2569 0, 911 1) SE PI°.!' O BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH P " December 7, 1984 MAY JR CITY 431 f]N...]N ij „ g [[rl ' Mr. Bob Tomberg DEC5611119thS.E. 7 1984 Bellevue, WA 98066 611I DidC,, SLBJECT: Santa/Tomberg, Honey Creek Assoc. PUD Dear Mr. Tomberg: flis letter is to try and clarify the situation that presently exists ref. N.E. 23rd Street access to your PUD project. If you will recall our original decision made it difficult for you to ncogtiate with the owner of the south one-half of the proposed N. E. 23rd Street. We now have revised that decision and you will be able to proceed with your project because it does not hinge on that acquisition. However, if your negotiations now are unsatisfactory, we would be willing to pursue condemnation so that the south one-half can be constructed as originally agreed upon. Please keep us informed of the status of these negotiations. Very truly yours, Richard C. Houghton Public Works Director RC:H:pmp c( : Ron Nelson Roger Blalock Pat Prewitt BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 235-2540 09 rF sEPSE® c. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH December 5, 1984 MAYOR Mel Easter Johnson and Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue S.. Suite 200 Renton, WA 98055 Re: Santa/Tomberg PUD (Honey Creek Associates), Files R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 Dear Mr. Easter: The Environmental Review Committee has considered the access proposal specifically submitted on November 20, 1984, as to it compliance with the specific conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee in their Declaration of Nonsignificance dated July 16, 1984. They did find that your proposed emergency access on the present alignment on N.E. 23 Street did meet the intent of their original decision which specifically stated that N.E. 23rd Street shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City from the projects west property line to Harrington Place N.E. However, they do want to point out that Jefferson Avenue N.E. shall be extended northward to connect with N.E. 23rd Street and shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City for a standards street. Your specific plans dated November 20, 1984, show it as a driveway. That is specifically not acceptable to the Environmental Review Committee. This letter is to clarify the fact that that roadway shall meet minimum City standards including curbs, gutters, and a walkway on one side, with appropriate street lighting. In addition, the pavement should be a maximum of 32 feet. The intent of the ERC was to allow the Pubic Works Department final design approval prior to the submission of the final PUD. Please be aware that this is only a clarification of the original letter and the appeal date of December 8, 1984, is still valid. Appeals must be submitted to the Land Use Hearing Examiner under the old policies for any environmental decision issued before October 1, 1984. The appeals must be in writing and submitted under the specific procedures of Section 4-3014. If I can provide any further assistance, I would be happy to meet with either yourself or the proponents during the next two days. Sincerely, iNetive-cleT11.Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:1209Z:c1 OF RA, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 094r D SEPTE OP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1984 TO: FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES) FILES: ECF-015-84, R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 The Environmental Review Committee has received a revised drawing showing emergency access for the above referenced project. Please review and comment on this latest proposal. This item will be scheduled on the ERC agenda for the November 28th meeting. MEMORANDUM TO Building & Zoning Department DATE 11-26-84 FROM Jim Matthew, Fire Prevention SUBJECT Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. Em ncy Access The type of access control proposed will not meet approval. In order for the revised proposed project to be approved, an emergency access of at least 20 feet in width shall be provided. It is my recommendation that the Public Works Department review this plan closely with special attention to future needs of a dedicated city street along Northeast 23rd. Perhaps, environmentally this is the best solution. JFM:mbt CITY Ot ;RENw i ON kg c1.1 t6, NOV 2 1984 utf'1. r' OF R4. 1 ;I$ • ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR naoLL 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09qt6D SEPE P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM Nuv 6 DACE: NOVEMBER 26, 1984 TO:T"I R-Z Lry-11 tiJ FROM: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES) FILES : ECF-015-84, R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 The Environmental Review Committee has received a revised drawing showing emergency access for the above referenced project. Please review and comment on this latest proposal. This item will be scheduled on the ERC agenda for the November 28th meeting. ZECF1VED r!1v 0 5 198 P / r + BOB TOMBERG. D.D.S. 5611 119TH S. E. BELLEVUE, WASH. 98006 746-6554 November 2, 1984 CITY OF REND im_qN@17231:i Richardchard C. Houghton NOV 7 1984 Director of Public ';corks Hunicipal Bldg. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, 1, 7a. 98055 Dear 1Dick: I am writing to request a re-evaluation of the Honey Creek Ass_ ciates proposed P.U.D. based on a review of the progress we have made thus far and in light of our current impass. Your environmental review committee initially requested in its original declaration of non-significance dated 6-18-84 that vie modify our original proposal to provide additional emergency access to our parcel as well as the major access point at Jefferson Street. Vie submitted a drawing indicating emergency access at Kirkland Place which your committee accepted as adequate. As we evaluated that access point we ' found it to be beyond the scope of our construction abilities due to a grading problem. Vie then presented four alternative emergency access points for the committee' s review. Your respTnse to those alternatives has a new declaration of non- significance dated 7-16-84 requiring an additional major access point at Twenty-third street and to suggest we explore the feasability of acquiring the additional right of way needed to 'complete the south one half of Twenty-third street which the city does not own. We complied by contacting Mr. James Chandler who is the owner of the parcel to the south of Twenty-third street. At this time he has no interest in dedicating his portion of Twenty- third street to the city or selling said portion to us. His only interest is to sell the entire parcel for an unreasonable cash only figure with no contingencies. We are financially unable to meet his demands. At this point I no longer feel we can consider Twenty-third street as a major access point to our parcel although emergency access there is still a possibility. It is possible other alternatives to acquire the street may become available at some time but I feel none are likely in the near future. I believe we are wasting much precious time by exploring options not available to us at present. 11Yourseconddeclarationofnon-significance dated 7-16-84 requiring a second major access point is not consistant with your original declaration requiring one major and one emer- gency access route. It is in fact substantially different from both of our original planning efforts and now seriously impacts the project. We believe we all agree this P.U. D./Rezone process should proceed in a timely fashion, and that acquisition of additional right of way may take 6 months to 6 years or longer. Consequently I have instructed the Johnson/Braund Design Group to provide you again with additional emergency access alternatives. as you requested in your original declaration of non significance. We stand `ready to meet with your singlely or as a group to further delineate our position and hopefully arrive at a workable solution which is good for both the City of Renton as well as Honey Creek Associates. Please contact me at your earliest convenience. Your continued effort is deeply appreciated. Sincerely 1 . jic.///(//( Bob Tomberg, D.D.S. BT/j w OF R4, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 A co. 09g1 0 SEPTE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR October 4, 1984 Mr. Bob Tomberg, D.D.S. 5611 119th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 SUBJECT: Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. (Honeycreek Associates) Files: R-014-84, PPUD-015-84, ECF-014-84 Dear Mr. Tomberg: The Renton Environmental Review Committee is in receipt of your letter dated September 25, 1984, for which you are asking us to extend the appeal date of the final declaration of non-significance published July 16, 1984 for the above referenced application. In your request you have asked that the extention be granted until December 8, 1984., in order to allow more time for your negotiations for the dedication of N.E. 23rd Street. Please be advised that the Committee considered your request at its September 27th meeting and concurred with the request to extend the appeal date as indicated. We will therefore hold off scheduling the public hearing until the aforementioned item is resolved. For the Environmental Review Committee: Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JFI._:cl 0533N cc: Mel Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue S., Suite 200 Renton, WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON Li BOB TOMBERG, D.D.S. SEP 2 I 1984 5611 119TH S. E. BELLEVUE.WASH. 98006 BUILDING/ZONING DC 746-6554 September 25, 1984 Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, PIa. 98055 Dear Roger: Thank you for your letter of September 21 , 1984. Since our meeting I have been diligently locating Mr. Chandler (the owner of the property adjacent to 23rd street) . I have traced him from Ohio to Fresno, California where I found him. We are now in the process of negotiating for dedication of his half of 23rd street. I believe we will have a final agreement in not more then 60 days. If you could extend our final date of appeal to December 8, 1984 it would be greatly appreciated. I am sure you will understand that without that street your propasal is not accomplishable. I appreciate your patience. Sincerl Bob Tbm erg, D.D.S. Honey Creek Associates BT/jw OIT R4, 1 116 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ate. • RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR ina p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 90 0. 09grFD SEPS P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Septem3er 21, 1984 Mr. Mel Easter Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue S. Suite 2C'0 Renton, WA 98055 RE: Santa/Tomberq PUD/R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 (ECF-014-84) Dear Mr. Easter: The abcve referenced PUD application was brought back on the Environmental Review Committee's agenda on September 19, 1984. In the course of our review, it was noted that on both July 20, 1984 and July 27, 1984, requests by letter were made to allow an e..:tension of the appeal period for the final environmental declaration in order to give the property owners, Mr. Santa and Mr. Tomberg, a chance to negotiate for better access to the subject property. It is our understanding that a verbal agreement was given to extend the appeal period for the negc;tiations. It has now been over two months since the environmental declaration was published and posted. In that time, we have not received any corrsepondence on how better a cess can be provided in lieu of what the Committee conditioned. By way of this letter then, please be advised that the final appeal date has now been set as Monday, October 9, 1984. Mr. Mel Easter September 21, 1984 Page As an additional note, the final declaration of non-significance was issued for the rezone and PUD applications only. An environmental declaration must also be made for the annexation proposal. This department is currently routing the environmental checklist submitted to the Policy Development Department for review and comments. Upon completion of this review, we will schedule this item on the Committee's agenda and proceed with ati environmental determination. For the Environmental Review Committee: Roger J. Blayloali Zoning Administrator RJB:J1=L:cl 0517N cc: Honey Creek Associates 5611 119th S.E., Suite #2 Bellevue, WA 98005 Policy Development Department JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants CITY G'=psis t ON • JUL 3 01984 July 27, 1984 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for ERC Reconsideration Our Project #83-47 Santa/Tomberg Property PPUD-015-84 Roger: Please accept this letter as our request for an extension of time on the declaration of non-significance published July 16, 1984. The property owners, Mr. Santa and Mr. Tomberg, are in negotiations to provide better access to the subject property. At such time that negotiations warrant, the owners will request an audience with the ERC committee to discuss possible alternatives. Your consideration regarding this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. 2Z2/%f/ Melvin R. Easter cc: Bob Tomberg Mick Santa Architecture, Engineering &Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L. Allwine, ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 206)27'-7200 (206)623-5732 JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants CITY OF RENTON LLDJuly20, 1984 JUL 2 4 1984 Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Request for ERC reconsideration Our Project #83-47 Santa/Tomberg Property PPUD-015-84 Roger: This letter is to request an extension of time in order to further evaluate the declaration of environmental non significance published July 16, 1984. Due to the significant nature of the access solutions proposed by the ERC, additional time is requested to study and discuss the possible alternatives with the City Staff. A meeting has been scheduled with Mr. Dick Houghton, Public Works Director, on Friday, July 27, 1984. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. NS7d(rik" Melvin R. Easter MRE:smb cc: Bob Tomberg Architecture, Engineering &Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L.Allwine,ARCH, 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 206)271-7200 (206)623-5732 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL Public Notice DETERMINATION constructed in two phases.REVIEW COM- p ses. The first MITTEE phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek;propertyRENTON, onmW l Review Co located in the vicinityof the 2200blockTheEnvironmentalReviewCommittee ERC) has issued a final declaration of of Jefferson Avenue N.E. non-significance for the following projects: FRANK FISHCHER(ECF-073-84) A pplRation Y M. goo N( ECF- O 2 5a8c4re of Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from G-1 to L-1,file R-077-84; poperty from R-3 to B 1 to allow a gated on the north and south sides of future beauty shop to be located on the S.W Grady Way at the 1300 block, besubjectproperty,file R-076-84;located h"n Oaksdale Avenue S W and at 426 Burnett Avenue South. Longacres Drive S.W. Further information regarding this action CITY OF RENTON,POLICY DEVELO- available in the Building and Zoning MENT DEPARTMENT(ECF-074-84) Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Honey Creek Comprehensive Plan Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of Amendment. A study has been pre- ERC action must be filed with the Hearing pared to review inconsistent corn- Examiner by July 30, 1984. prehensive plan designations in the Published in the Daily Record Chronicle area of Honey Creek Park plat and July 16, 1984 R9266 adjacent transmission line easement in the northeast quadrant area. The Environmental Review Committee ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES(ECF- 014-84) Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1,R-1,and R-2, file R-014-84, and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi- family condominium development hav- ing 185 housing units,file PPUD-015- 84. This revised application is to be 0454N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENT ON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: F RANK FISCHER (ECF-073-84) Application to rezone 0.14 acre of property from R-3 to B-1 to allow a future beauty shop to be located on the subject property, file R-076-84; located at 426 Burnett Avenue South. CITY OF RENTON, POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (ECF-074-84) Honey Creek Comprehensive Plan Amendment. A study has been prepared to review inconsistent comprehensive plan designations in the area of the Honey Creek Park plat and adjacent transmission line easement in the northeast quadrant area. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES (ECF-014-84) Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-1, R-1, and R-2, file R-014-84, and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium development having 185 housing units, file PPUD-015-84 . This revised application is to be constructed in two phases. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey 12reek; property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue V.E. ARRY M. BROWN (ECF-075-84) Application to rezone 0.72 acre of property from G-1 to L-1, file R-077-84; Located on the north and south sides of S.W. Grady Way at the 1300 block, between Oaksdale Avenue S.W. and Longacres Drive S.W. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by July 30, 1984. Published: July 16, 1984 V CITY Q r RENTON DCITYOFRENTON, WASHINGTON JAN 2 7 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY L/ /,/ Application No. Om_ g"7 1 0440'-)1.5-el/ Environmental Checklist No. £-F! ())`7'-A"-/ PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: _ Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Honey Creek Associates 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Agent: Johnson-Braund Design Group P.S. , Inc. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, WA 98055 (206) 271-7200 3. Date Checklist submitted January 11 . 1984 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Building & Zoning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : A multi-family condominium project with 45 townhouse units and 140 two story stacked flats in two separate developments on a 48.5 acre site. Each development has 2 access points, swimming pool , tennis court, and tot lot. The two developments are connected with a ped- estrian path. 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , assncell as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, luding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : See Attachment "A" 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 1989 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : Annexation from King County to City of Renton, Rezone, P.U.D. approval , Building Permit, 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: N/A 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Yes, City of Renton is proposing to install a sanitary sewer line in the Honey Creek bed. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See attached Annexation application. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X substructures? YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- X covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief ATEfeatures? ES MAY1E NO-- d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES— MAYBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils. X either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Mr YBI' Explanation: See Attachment "A" 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air X quality? YES ROTE' NU— b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES RATITE Far c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation: See Attachment "A" 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE W f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through X interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, X or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: See Attachment "A" 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , X microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE N d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES Wir NO Explanation: See Attachment "A" r i 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms . X insects or microfauna)? YES yam No-- b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAY BE NO Explanation: See Attachment "A" 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation:The development will introduce a small amount of people and vehicular activity bu .v'll be buffered try vegetation. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?YES MAYBE TO-- Explanation: There will be artificial lighting introduced around iuildings rand in parking areas. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the X present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: X a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: To the extent that the site itself is a natural resource, this proposal may represent a depletion. 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides . chemicals or radiation) X in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES TIME NX Explanation: 11) Population. Will the distri— bution, r e density, or gro proposal wthrate aofe h location, thehumanpopulation of an area? X Explanation: - See Attachment "A" 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The project may affect housing availability simply by the addition of 185 residential units to the area. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or X movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by "Transportation Planning and Engineering, Inc." 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO X b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO X d) Parks or other recreational facilities? IYES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See Attachment "A" 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy. or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE RD— Explanation: This proposal will add slightly to the demand_.upon•,existing sources of electrical energy. 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO • 6- X d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES M NT- X e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE HU- f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding X mental health)? a YES MAYBE X Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical X site, structure, object or building? vES MAYBE- Nii-- Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of ful) disclosure on my part. Proponent:Pt 3 a b 9i/f i ed c /W name print d City of Renton Building i Zoning Department May, 1983 Form I 176 CITY ur KLty 1 WV 1 , r t.POiim,Y DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEF - ANNEXATION APPLICATION NOTE TO THE APPLICANT: Please complete all appropriateapplication below.sections of the Information contained in this application will be used in preparing all of the necessary documentation for this annexation; therefore, d for ease type or response to anyearly print of these sections, l of he necessary feel free to information. If additional space 9u with regard to this attach additional sheets to this application. If you have any questions application, please feel free to contact the Policy Development Department at 235-2552, oryoumaydiscussthismatterinpersonintheMunicipalBuilding, third floor. 10% NOTICE OF INTENT APPLICATION - Please include a $200 filing fee. PROPONENT CONTACT PERSON if other than proponent Honey Creek Associates Therms A. Johnson, AIA Name Address 5611 - 119th S.E. , Suite 12 Johnson Braund Design Group, P.S. ,Inc. City Bellevue, WA 98006 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 206) 746-6454 Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 271-7200 Telephone_ LOCATION A portion of the NW 1/4, Sec. 4, T23N, R5E, W.M. S Ft.2,112,660Acres48-5 Property Address Not Applicable Lot Area 9- See attached 1983 Real Estate Tax Statement for Account Numbers Legal Description H-042305-9022-09 and H-042305-9007-08. Also, see attached map of the property. PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION - Briefly describe the reasons you desire to annex. WHEREAS: The City of Renton is funding a sewer trklithrough the above property regardless of the annexation procedures. WHEREAS: A new tax base will not be created for the sewer project unless the above property is annexed and developed. WHEREAS: Honey Creek is a beautiful natural resource. WHEREAS: There is a need for more affordable housing in the area. WHEREAS: The above property is currently a weekend haven for motorcycle riders against the owner's wishes) Be it resolved that the above area be annexed to the city of Renton to: 1 . Provide a new residential area within the city which is free from the noise and errosive effects of indiscriminate vehicular use. 2. Maintain the sensitive natural beauty of Honey Creek. 3. Create a new tax base for proposed underground utilities which shall traverse the property. 4. Fulfill the need for affordable housing in the community. 5. Allow all the citizens of the area the ability to appreciate the beauty of Honey Creek without the ill effects of its uncontrolled use. AFFIDAVIT I being truly sworn, declare that I am Owner of the PropertyInvolveda Authorized Representative to act for the Property Owner in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained andtheinformationherewithsubmittedareinallrespectstrueandcorrecttothebestofmy knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF v 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN : AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT J Address: Name of Notary Public: s 1 Pls.k. SEE REVERSE S i DE 13& HEAL; LSIAlt. IAX SIAILMENI• , .. KING COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTOr!! •JtNUMBER •7-••• • . • •• . 3 a.s .,.i., 6227.131.. 10 C . 1 Ccunt:- 15. i I Ftc.s06\'' AV.-i F•Pn S\:-- I f..s,...-,.l.'as Wale( 1IL1apiLT.21, 112illkir1lilif ii---1•11# 1 i u-'eerie:my N.1..:t Sec Sp.e,pat A NTA .11IC K C 1N32•23LTel",c.,,,,,L,0 .;,:. • 4 44 iISS-PINE LX ---R D ---SE.- 1v. pm, riust.r.s, sSSAQUAH• VA 9802 7 17...o......i aay kVA i I_ 7iiii t_..t.::.. -::-r-rf.'-':i E•E!-=• ANNi JAI 04.e Pet,;•It itiz•et H. i----2- 3- 175 . • -•-;• -9022-- 415-5--:-1)4.:-23 05 scs-ona ria-0 ", (WC E.aiii OF. NW -1/4 LESS. P 0 R .1:1?:. N OF oucn!:::ein OCTOBI N.BEG ON :I- 1LN .or "NW,:11.4 1-31•:.4- FT. S OF- ITS ----NE; COI? T1-1 :W TO T.•-•.:-.....:-..:-....;,!:ir: T-,-01,1'Li r•-1.-.N. r- OF: F- 1/2:::-.0E-7 N le.---174 - P Y:ii: 1'32 TT S. *Off:ITS-7--N Id-.---C 9 R'•-•LES-.S • - ETC 7-- ----1--- ------=:::--•------- -- ---- -. 7 • 2,---SEE'S' E.VERSC; SIOI1.. 198;1-..., . NUMBER : - -- 0 : - - .- • - :. . - c:\ • fEEff7-$1711-1-rarrri135-.9007-.708 • f • . - . -;-* - ) t- " • - •'—' N.,-:‘,)_.- : ii--,-,,,,-- • •-• 1....„......:- hos.-11 Supp:•••-• C -. ' ' . ' --::_..- 7,-... 1-___:. -. - • ..% \,...." . . t s. <\.•:, 4 ...... --. _.. • . gland . ' N - -. .•.. .!- . t or, -- * •- 6.-et /dr the •er. '• LPARTS WHENPAYING IN PERSON- •;--',- - -• -. •• t_thiary t:-•, .:..:.,- -.:-- s;------4 :z•-:;•••:-::;')--:-,•••.--•:- •-?e2- :::' --- -: .9!'"1-1- . - - -.-- 2.-:-.-• - -:--;-..-.:-,„-._;-_:- 4..: :..:::,;.,..:.-%:•-.!_-.-.----:- --; •*-.- - .tn:ergeric-.5E•P So: 2.".'*•-;. -- :••••--7.• : .-:-- • 7 4..-. .- - . - - -- . -- Spncia:•Artessmen I . . NTA 111C K•••:-C.-•,-:-... .-;::•::•.r:..-::::-•.:. F.-2-.-- .."--A N19 8 9..-rol-_-:i coRriEn:TAX 44. 1SSAQUAH-PINEAAKE -RD •-•--.SE - - - 1 us. Pen-rourt bttaiSAOIJAH-11!A •,-.7f.,= •;.---.•••:.....---.• -:: ---::-:- 98027 - - • - - • 3::•641.-•APrel 7.3P A.::ir.',:'....1.2:4::::.;il!. •••: 7 tfulfikt _131.0 Mt=ODE 4g..SEC 110;-..443-m_ 12 c..-..ANNUAL. 1:"per.alt3,-(Sio-rie, 23-D5 = '- : -10[17•- 41S.5 II 44 -2_9 •1:15 0”:0 hi:: tax bect 733-4.9 -F•T•i-OF•• :N :1131-4 -FT OFF 33-28.-F:1 *--.-OF: NW 1/4 LESS- -N - - - - . •. - .....: . - 2-7 FT- OF !E.-555-14 FT LESS P OR 1-4"c'f'z; 11LY -0 F. 32DTH s"PL:jSE- g . NLY Fs--•1,,..:1,..-• 9?T/1 :ST 71-ESS• CO :RD --_ . 1II _ SE_ 9' T 1 irk 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 zc. z-7 29 L .tiliEURNatbto 113 _ It . .. .i . EDWIN' eiN IPLe II lava - - T. Mk ' WWII I ..plc. . i Mil 1;3.1115011 -5 vi,/. /4 . 3 . 1• ' t 6U BJ .Ci imili s 1 2, 1t 1` ' PROQ5 12`(Le urea 1 t_iolio17 i;11.01 Aermilr . Aouni,_,,,,, •-, • ,. i Igo erotiaWf 4 ' 2 _4 1 Ai 7 N 3 1U. s Vila F. a P IF / T . j ER^i / s F b w ( J . L igs. egil1140. a. 1 . 4 1) 14 . 7 it' 3_ . ii. . i . _ a : . 76 , . v. 8 3 5 a 1<. 1. 4' s -. 1 - I 3 2- 4 - - 4- 41‘ 1 rs t- —III._ - 1111C REST s Q ./ M[NTARY 1 1 1 • z 13 1 SCHOOL .- --- -s d IISz. 1 i 1 E I 1- 1 1 , 2 ) 7 4 S s 1 NORTH 3 1 I I E. 17 , 7 !( it. - -- - j. 1- I I1161-ILAND5 L I I 1 , -; I Z , 4 . y 1 : _ 6 _ PARK I. . , 2 _ 4 , 3 , Iz f--- - 4. 4t 1. J J 4 1 Y T / ,- •= .1 "a 9 N_E. 1 rK ST. I I r- e 3 T-- I I Q 0 ligi 2 „ ill g I i 1 Ell I3 S N E.15'", PL. Attachment "A" Background 7. The proposed project is located in the "Highlands" area of Renton one mile east of Interstate 405. Access to the property is from four (4) existing residential streets: 122nd Avenue Southeast and Southeast 100th Street on the north side; Jefferson Street and Northeast 21st Street on the south side. Over 80% of the 48.5 acre site is covered with heavy stands of virgin native vegetation including Douglas Fir, Alder, Madrona, Maple, Salal, Ferns, etc. "Honey Creek" bisects the site and becomes the collector for two major ravines on the property with grades ranging from 15 to 80%. Because of the complex slopes, development on the site is limited to approximately 8 acres in the Northeast corner and 6.6 acres in the southwest corner. II. Environmental Impacts 1. Earth b,c,e) This proposal will require paved parking and private drive surfaces. Construction of these features will result in disruption and overcovering of the soils as well as slight variations in the existing topography. Erosion potential will increase temporarily as the vegetative covering is removed during construction. However, the resulting disturbance to the topography will be minimal. 2. Air a,c) The increase in local traffic volume will introduce additional automotive emissions, and construction will temporarily increase the volume of suspended particulates. In both cases the increase will be small. Because of the introduction of buildings, automobiles, and people, the micro climate within each developed area will be slightly altered. 3. Water b) The impervious parking areas and roadway surfaces will reduce absorption rate and in turn will increase surface water runoff. 4. Flora a,c) Construction of the proposed condominium development will eliminate a portion of the existing vegetation. Once built, however, new species of flora will be introduced on the site. Impacts on existing vegetation will be minimal with approximately 70% of the site left undisturbed. 5. Fauna a,c,d) This proposal will reduce a small amount of the existing wildlife habitat and may slightly alter migration patterns of certain fauna. However, a large majority of the native vegetation and "green space" will be preserved for wildlife habitat. 11. Population This condominium proposal will add 185 residential units and will alter the present density and population growth rate in the area. The project, however, does not represent an -inconsistency in the comprehensive zoning and development plan for this area. 14. Public Services a,b,c,d,f) The project will increase tax revenues for all public service agencies and in turn require attention by those departments. Police, fire protection, and governmental services will be required for the health, safety, and welfare of the residents. The proposed project could attract up to 100 school aged children. It is also likely that the residents of this development will make use of local recreational opportunities, although the impact on these facilities should be negligible since full recreational amenities will be provided on site including: two pools, two spas, two tennis courts, and two tot lots. a• CITY D4- s.3 c, 151 JAN271984 BUILDING;ZONING DEPT. SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Prepared for JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP P. S. , INC. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 1126 108th Avenue N. E. Bellevue, Washington 98004 January 10, 1984 A Project Description The Santa/Tomberg property is located in unincorporated King County adjacent to 120th P1. S. E. , approximately one mile east of the I-405 Kennydale Interchange (N. E. 30h Street ) . The hilly property is bisected by Honey Creek, and is presently unimproved. The property is bounded on the west and south by the Renton City Limits. The proposed action includes annexation of the property to the City of Renton. A Planned Unit Development (P. U. D. ) consisting of 185 multifamily residential units is proposed for the Santa/Tomberg Property. Because the site is bisected by the steep Honey Creek ravine, the P. U. D. would be constructed as two geographically separate areas, on either side of the ravine. Pedestrian recreational paths may link the two areas, but no direct vehicular links are proposed. Each area would have its own parking, tennis court, tot lot, and swimming pool for use by residents and their guests only. The northeast area of the site would have 112 multifamily residential units (80 two story stacked flat units and 32 townhouse units ) and approximately 175 parking stalls. Vehicular access would be via an extension of 122nd Avenue S. E. , which presently intersects S. E. 95th Way. The southwest area of the site would have 73 multifamily residential units (60 two story stacked flat units and 13 townhouse units ) and approximately 118 parking stalls. Vehicular access would be via extensions of Jefferson Avenue N. E. to the north, and N. E. 21st Street to the east, which would intersect within the site. 1 Existing Conditions The attached figures show the str network in northeast Renton and the vicinity of the Santa/Tomberg site. Freeway access is via the I-405 Kennydale Interchange (N. E. 30th Street ) and the I-405 North Renton Interchange (N. E. Park Dr. ) . The City of Renton Arterial Street Map shows the N. E. Park Drive - N.E. Sunset Blvd. route as a major arterial . The N. E. 30th Street - Kennewick P1 . N. E. - N. E. 27th Street - Edmonds Avenue N. E. route is a secondary arterial, as is Union Avenue Northeast. N. E. 12th Street is a collector arterial. The King County Interim Transportation Plan: Focus 1990 shows Coal Creek Parkway S. E. 136th Avenue S. E. ) as a major arterial. The S. E. 95th Way - 120th P1. S. E. route and 132nd Avenue S. E. are shown as collector arterials. There are no designated arterials within the area bounded by Edmonds Avenue N. E. , the S. E. 27th Street - 120th P1. S. E. - S. E. 95th Way route, Union Avenue N. E. ( 132nd Avenue S. E. ) , N. E. Sunset Blvd. , and N. E. 12th Street.The Santa/Tomberg property is close to the middle of this area, which measures one mile from Edmonds Avenue N. E. to Union Avenue N. E. , and nearly one mile from N.E. Sunset Blvd. to S. E. 95th Way. The streets in the area generally have two lanes, with the exception of the four-lane N.E. Park Drive - N. E. Sunset Blvd. Route. Traffic control signals are located on this route at the I-405 freeway ramps, Sunset Blvd. N. E. , Edmonds Avenue N.E. , Harrington Avenue N. E. , N.E. 10th Street, N. E. 12th Street, Union Avenue N. E. , and Duvall Avenue N. E. 2 Figure 1 shows 1983 average weekday traffic volumes adjusted from counts taken by the City of Renton, King County, and TP&E. Traffic delays and some congestion occurs at the signalized intersections on the high-volume N. E. Park Dr. - N. E. Sunset Blvd. route particularly during the peak hours. Traffic generally flows freely on the other arterials in the area, with occasional generally brief delays experienced by motorists turning onto or crossing these arterials from side streets. 3 Future Conditions Figure 2 shows projected 1989 average daily traffic volumes in the vicinity without the Santa/Tomberg P. U. D. These volumes are based on the 1983 AWDT ' s and projected to 1989 assuming a 3% annual traffic volume growth rate. This is a moderate background traffic volume growth rate which is based on the assumption that traffic volume growth will be roughly in proportion to population growth in the area. This 3% rate is the annualized growth rate calculated from the 1978. and 1990 populations for the northeast Renton planning area, contained in the City of Renton Northeast Renton Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Santa/Tomberg P. U. D. is expected to generate approximately 1480 vehicular trips on an average weekday at full occupancy. A vehicular trip is defined as "a single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering ) inside the study site" (Trip Generation - An Informational Report,Institute of Transportation Engineers, 'Third Edition, 1983 ) . This (estimate is based on 185 multifamily units and a trip generation rate of 8 trips per unit. The studies conducted for the ITE report show an average rate of 7. 9 trips per unit, with a maximum of 10. 0 trips per unit and a minimum of 6. 2 trips per unit for planned unit developments. The ITE average rates indicate that approximately 150 trips ( 10% ) would occur during the AM peak hour, with about half leaving and half entering the Santa/Tomberg site. About 150 trips ( 10% ) would also occur during the PM peak hour, with about 85 entering and about 65 leaving the site. Approximately 900 of the average weekday trips would be generated in the northeast area of the site, with the remaining 580 daily trips generated in the southwest area of the site. 4 Figure 3 shows the estimated distribution of the P. U. D. site-generated average weekday traffic onto the street network. About 60% of the traffic generated by the southwest area of the P. U. D. is expected to use Kirkland Avenue N. E. south to N. E. 12th Street and beyond. Some traffic will use N. E. 21st Street, Harrington P1. N. E. , and N. E. 23rd P1. (or N. E. 23rd Street ) as a short route between the site and the Kennydale Interchange, to use I-405 to the north. A smaller percentage is expected to use Harrington Avenue N. E. and N. E. 16th Street as a route to Edmonds Avenue Northeast. The primary access to the northeast area of the site will be on 122nd Avenue S. E. to S. E. 95th Way. A secondary access has been suggested on S. E. 100th Street, connecting through to 132nd Avenue N. E. (Union Avenue N. E. ) via several residential streets. Though this access is not shown on the current Santa/Tomberg P. U. D. -site plan, it would enhance the accessibility of the northeast area of the site, and therefore has been included in this traffic analysis. It is expected that about 40% of the northeast site area traffic would use this S. E. 100th Street route to Union Avenue N. E. , continuing on to the Renton Highlands business areas, or to Renton proper. The 60% of the northeast site area traffic using 122nd Avenue S. E. is expected to split nearly evenly to the east and to the west on S. E. 95th Way. Northbound traffic would continue on to either I-405 or Coal Creek Parkway. If access to S. E. 100th Street is not provided for the northeast site area, then all 900 trips would use 122nd Avenue Southeast. Of these it is estimated that about 350 would use S. E. 95th Way to the west, and about 550 would use S. E. 95th Way to the east. 5 Figure 4 shows projected 1989 AWDT ' s with the Santa/Tomberg P. U. D. fully occupied. The traffic volumes shown generally are the sum of the traffic volumes shown on Figures 2 and 3. It is assumed that the northeast P. U. D. site area would have access to S. E. 100th Street. The on-site roadways would connect 122nd Avenue S. E. to S. E. 100th Street. A small amount of the existing traffic generated by the existing residential areas east of the site may use this route as a shortcut to Kennydale. The AWDT on S. E. 100th Street would probably be in the range of 400 - 500 . If access is not provided to S. E. 100th Street, then the 1989 AWDT on 122nd Avenue S. E. would be approximately 1300. These projected traffic volumes on 122nd Avenue S. E. are higher than traffic volumes on most typical residential local access streets. Rather than serving as simply a residential street, 122nd Avenue S. E. would function as a neighborhood collector by helping to provide mobility from the intersecting streets to the S. E. 95th Way arterial . The 122nd Avenue S. E. roadway appears to be in good physical condition and will provide this function safely and efficiently. Since S. E. 95th Way is such a low volume arterial, its intersection with 122nd Avenue S.E. would continue to function well, with only occasional brief delays to side street traffic. The installation of stop or yield signs on S. E. 96th P1. east and west of 122nd Avenue S. E. should be considered. Traffic generated by the P. U. D. would have several impacts on the N. E. 21st Street - Harrington P1. N. E. - N. E. 23rd P1. and N. E. 23rd Street ) route. N.E. 21st Street east of Harrington Pl. N.E. is presently constructed as a half-street, with a 20 ' wide pavement and curb and gutter only on the south side. This relatively short street segment will need to be widened in order to safely accomodate the increased traffic volumes due to the P. U. D. The increased traffic volumes on N. E. 23rd P1. and N.E. 23rd Street will probably not be very 6 noticeable to residents because the total volumes will still be relatively low, and well within the typical volume range on residential streets. Both of these streets have recently been improved, including new pavement and curb and gutter, so they will easily accomodate the increased volumes. Increased traffic volumes on Harrington Pl. N. E. between N. E. 21st Street and N. E. 23rd Street may be more noticeable to residents. This street segment appears to be in fair to poor physical condition, with patchy pavement and no curb or gutter. However, the expected traffic volumes and traffic operations on Harrington Pl. N. E. will still be acceptable for a residential local access street. The very short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. north of Kirkland Avenue N.E. may need some repairs to the existing pavement. Kirkland Avenue N. E. and N. E. 16th Street appear to be in reasonably good condition, and will easily accomodate the increased traffic volumes. These streets function as neighborhood collectors and will continue to do so effectively. Virtually no P. U. D. - generated traffic is expected to use Hillcrest Lane Northeast. This relatively narrow rou e which meanders through the rest home and its parking area is not really a shortcut, and its use would require an extra stop. Kirkland Avenue N. E. would be a much faster and more easily negotiated route. The P. U. D. - generated traffic is not expected to have a significant impact on the intersection of Kirkland Avenue N.E. and N. E. 12th Street. Left turning and through traffic on Kirkland Avenue N. E. experienced level of service C during the 1983 PM peak hour. Calculatirns for the 1989 PM peak hour indicates that this - -ft turning or through traffic would experience level of service D with or without the P. U. D. - generated traffic. 7 NE J KENNYO ajsT r N NEr30THH ST HAN V BRo g5 cr 40 t rW 11 q6( M O l KENNYDALE 0 6' i =jA 4 ELEMENTARY SO O y NE 28TN ST ct SCHOOL ENE 28rH ST 32 33 4 1O 124 N- '• 5 E WM 33<- 34 0, ) 277TNE,H 5400 NE 27TH sT 4 • 1 y sE 96T T 23 N- ,. 5E WM q 3 c CT 4600 I = • Z Wzpr t, , Z Pvl) Op Z 1.. < SE 98TH rii awl if KENNYDALE W > • O t•• ST y IERRA.HEIGHTS O \ \ a •9TH ELEMENTARY 9TH ST F't1.E*TE W W 1dOtiS ySCHOOLW F" Z .,l PARK W NE 25TH ST ST OR0W . Z Ii i NTA SE IIIT ST J 2 < NE •-••-t 24TH ST x' W>.J' H ST ^ q x SE NE < 24TH ST SE m VP.; O 15 T 3 =W 8 NE 23R 1 250 PL. X X x ST y SE I01ST O US NE r •. l I 23RD ST pPR 0 . . R Y SE 102N0 _ >, sT co 2 SE m ium, (Pve) r E 150 p Z 0 r, ST W a,, .y 22ND ST '', d In z r•4 • 700 w, y so F Z O Z N E` N O • • w Z SE 103 R D ST Ty 8l I W z Z 21s7 4! c W 450 r EF z i 1000 Z 0 Z< 5T W SE 2 " 104TH ST r CT H NE 20TH ST Tr ZW= Z w ti W W NE 2or iJ' W 700 > W Z ST i<c G4Cp 4. Z ` Q NA, J SE 105TH x r OrW O O W NE 20THSTjIUi1NitQ = Z or_ 19THSTz400fPvt) j e ,,ha• 1' r" ",, I TH SE TN"' ST v=i fn j '- Eel W y NE 18TH HILLCREST ., hE 18 r'Lll 2 4i W W .. ST z• SC EM ST 1 K G ? h (I Z p O r O ocr 7 IN ' '. 7TH A I AMANr `O 7dF NfJ 3,, N _ Z O K 16T y i Z „\ r TiS`• ' 4. rAONQniSSZNE17THSrNE17THN16THUSTWID\60 HiGHl.AN1l > NEL•i•_. J ST SE 1( PARK 15TM K WW W ZW s Y W T 0 >Z .71 - r oz oRD 23)4 c) 2000 . . -.I;:;- z r a < h Tt ,`} 3 Z J Z K Z Z Pla Dround . W O Q., t ' NE ` ILt* Yrt405 W IOI IW W < Yt? W Z W Z Z O Z lf Z 15TH>< Z >Z > p > W m O I.'..'W O W < J N E W Z 0 p S T Y < 7.i < 2 < 0 --S'_-.l1_ = Z < NTH 4.1 OO Z O W 0 Z cc Y ST NE 14TH V < O NNE14THSTmMcKNIGHT ,0 JR.HIGH ti 6 NE 13TH 0 Reservoirs ST ' NOD W Z."'SCHOOL 1'' St W IO ST 4~ V W I S R OO oZ O WAlk > library O .(Ohrh a o a z i E \ Z aNEP.12TH < 54ST ` WNI 0 a_a NE 1 TH ST 441Z2 j III 1E., v oil tiF V < 8 9 ° AVEAo • hE• QvPOsf 2 >> tF+ I NE oa 0 2 v v Office NE- Q` SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY G PARK r e i In W Z le- NE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 11vJaHA em NE s NORTH RENTON •• W i0 = r i, INTERCHANGE a ENE Z 00®' F 2 I ADJUSTED 1983 AVERAGE WEEKDAY dd m 8 10IH PL O Z 'TRAFFIC VOLUMES (AWD'_'' 1IV` NE 10TH ST JOTN ` FIGURE I NE J KENçDJAST T N SINTETH HAN- • SV sao •cze id i g6fH 1/4 g2QELEMENTARY NE 28TH ST SCHOOL _ NE 28TH ST 32 33 •, 7 24 N-R 5 E WM 33< 34 /000 o NE NE 5 4 N : sE 96T pt. T 23 N-R 5 E WM 4 3 N it27640027TM ST I i io A. e' i z vV CT 5500 J N; b Q • 0p W SE 98T1' 1 r y rH evo Ins W I .. ST SE , IERRA HEIGHTS sr 99THS7CKENNYDAL$ Low > VI A N 99TH ELEMENTARY Flit7EW ' 1^ LIONS 0 \ t' o SCHOOLWW z .-r PARK W NE 25TH ST Z 4 AA = sr OR f O y/` IL 4 . NTA x SE la T ST ST ^ ter f <_24TH ST W r SE NE < 24TH STSE4401ST Q = NE 23RD 300 O. III X IXd01),, Sr W z SE 101ST O z` NE — a23R23RDSToWST> PRoP RY SE102ND > CT___ i NE 180 0 z 0 s' m*, < ST aaoyF Z W Z 22ND ST p d Z ..••0•••• SE 103 R O 800 r Wy T ST n Z W Z N E y ... T I t- W I"=1000` z Z oW a 21sr W A • N y 500 4y z 0 vZZSE -104TH ST hCr H > W NE 20TH ST Z f. 4` ti W M < W .'' NE 207H ' Z 4 P E ZW 80Q > c IZ ST"•trc ,0 Z ! \pL r J SE 105TH r O.-0r O W NE 20TH ST Z < W Zu Pvl) E 2 A 480 N J+ t 53 = Z NEC 19TH ST W NE 18TH r *IHILLCREST NE'18TF1 SE 6TH" ST vZ ( j ltl 2 i W i< W ~_ Sr.a•p SC EEM nr ST ?, t ma 11` C.rl Oe hE r ( I NN o DO 16Ty 74 o f N E 17TH I6 I Z tMAN P IalN.SE1 1 ' 2 Nf t'S Soa.., Z NE 17TH s 1 NE 17TH Z x Do Nr` n W ,-Q1 ST ST SE It r^ U ST W HIC:F1LANlri > NE ..— . rNEm16THOJPARh W < 15TH ST Z 1 OZ ORD 28 4 . r 2400 z E I405WzU Z. W Z z" PL_a ground. W Z W Z ''‘ It"'Q Z 2 W I 1 Z 5THj< * Il r*t4+1{)• Z >Z > Z W W J W W < J NE O W Z I a Q ST i Y < J < 0 < m I f__t.f 1_ Z a lc¢ NTH ! or.:)! jV Z Or/< W McKNIGHT Z - STNE14THd < NE 14TH ST JR.HIGH `' G EY 13TH KeErvo rs SONzzozSCHOOL1,5. W No0 s`T App` p Z sT' sEQQQWW0' 1 ZWWn. > Library ,. i\ J / O — ...J Z Z NE 12TH n < 5 4 ST < N I y i ` a a NE 1'TH ST 4 3 v a OR • yE J d1 W 8 9 AVE : tiE QvrE z tK 8 0o ° , Office ,aE,, IPINE SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY SO PARK OR d g W per Q rE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS s 900 HA 2/ NE NORTH RENTON W IIMMOillINTERCHANGE o NE z 0 of ,"' A I PROJECTED 1989 AWDT m 110TH PL W z W/O SANTA TOMBERG P. U. D. 1 NE 10TH ST I0 < l FIGURE 2 f y >GU NE J c KENNYD aiST N NT:RCHAN30711 b7..../.1V •Si sue t fir" KENNYDALE a in 4 ELEMENTARY OO H O Z NE 28TH $T C`SCHOOL ENE 28TH ST 32 33. :250 3p0 7 24 N- " 5 E WM 33< 34 r) NE NE 5 4 i) sE 96T K T 23 N- ,. 5E WM 432227TN ST I _iy. C' t' o-Z280Nti a H i pK) QO Z 250 I 1•• < SE 98TN' 2 e Toz W ST SE IERRA HEIGHTS KENNYUAIE NW > nR ni SE ELEMENTARY SF 9aT it. ST FIl_eTEWW ;?1JONS 0 a •TH F Z „t PARK W NE 25TH ST V 4 900 i ST SCHOOL ORn f '. W - Z 5 x SE 1••T ST ry H STX < NE ..% 24TH ST w( e A j^.1 W 90 1 350 STSE ST Q NE < 24TH ST SE g p NE Ej N Z SE 101ST W 23RD PL X X X W Z N E 23RD ST240Z Z @ P_ RAY W SE 102ND ^ tm ST a CT SE aj (Pvt)NE W d L Z APEWZ22NDSTOdroZ .`•••• O ` S E 103R D ZOO N' lyh/ T l/ Im Z z Z oW a 21 sr 580 a• ot re.q or ' ST EE z z I„:1000` C t- Z< ST W SE -104TH ST Z CT H NE 20TH ST ZW Z .(..‘-', ti W i W W N E 20T ,'-tad O Z W I50 m < ST Or Q J SE 105TH OZ Z NE 207H ST W < Z VI a- b YJ F r r W O W 1 Z Iu cx Y NE ZE19TH ST Pvt) t Z Q9I TH SE ST ' 19TH i > 1J,r 2 ZWNE18TH~_HILLCREST E 18 W 3 w W~- 5 y ZO SC EM 57 f i ST t%. 0 A p tiE (I O G m oer I NE 17TH p•THAN G lC r NN OZ 16T yIe• rW 1 Z y1\ 1? C l/ylS=] ID 2 0 f E N 1t'`' $ "Z NE 17TH NE 17TH ' ST 2 ^' U ST —W ,( r HI1;HI.ANL- w NELL Lai J - ST SE 11 NE m 16TH O° ; , • Z PART: W < 15TH WW 4 W 405 3 z z z i Z Play round. W a N 4 Q` I I NE i Lt*Z(-1 W U Yd._.; W Z W Z YNEounaammal W <J < < Z 4TH Y j W O Z .SST ONE14THSTmQMcKNIGHTtZ YNE 14TH V JR.HIGN 1j E 13TH rv0r5ISCHOOLSTWWTIr QE 1 Z Z Library QZ NE 1H < 4 ST < 5O`' 3 d`a NE I TH ST 4 J 1( z E t s_ a OR tiF 1 8 9 0 AVE ' hf Q Al N A\ u < O 0 O E NE Oa N 0 o Qy SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY so PARK r" 1' WI c aP 120 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS U OJ HA4 W NE P NORTH RENTON W INTERCHANGE NE z 00Vv.10 - I r`1 PROJECTED AWDT GENERATED BY 1 4 i1DTH PL`— Z SANTA/TOMBERG P. U. ^. Y NE LOTH ST IOl < RE< N FIGURE 3 v I F r i . . . --. •. wr 1 r KENNYD 3 Sr T NATeNNETRSHAN15say Si 0 c>Ilcsr 140 r 0, Z= g614 0 KENNYOALE I') in - 1 ELEMENTARY 0 QS 3Op O Nl28TH ST SCHOOL NE 28TH ST 32 33 970 \‘ 2 T 24 N- '. 5 E WM 33< 34 ro NE NE 5 4 N i SE 96T PL.23 N- " 5 E WM 4 3 N 27 .• 668p 27TN ST 970 i raw zy 1 c•"- 5CT 5780 Nou 4, Z J N> 1 ' • NI) O Z I 1 ^< SE 98TH w • t... ST SE 1•) TERRA HEIGHTS k w 1{ENHYI)A1JE w > ELEMENTARY F Q9TH S7 w i_ i '_ b0 0* o. 9TH SCHOOL 2ZtPARKW25THST4 . Z ST Z ANTA x SE 1••T STf+ NE -t 24TH ST ro -SE NE < 24THi01ST ST SSE30ONE390STD- I SE ]015T0z23RDPEXMtk\13 w F O Z NE S 23RD ST PR o P RAY SE Io2ND > ST CT SE in i . )) ` . 22ND22o ST ° A. dM d* 4* . F• 1000 WA,/ ST cr) a'' goyf Z N E urn Z SE 103RD ST T'y8TZ z z ow a 21 sr f500 or tEE Zz11- IOOO ST SE IN^ 04TH ST Z . H00ZZ PIE 20TH ST Zw Z r IO c ' 1NEE zorii ii-i`F\ E w 950 > en c> ILI • j., Or Q` t J SE 105TH OZ Z NE 20TH Sn w < Z GC Z E PL r I-w 7 O w o r z Pv1) * P"''( T 830 NE = NE 19TH ST rn NE 18TH HILL ER E T NE IBTN SE 6TH^ ST Fr) 1STH >`j• ,r 2 ST Z j\ G v 2 la 0< > + o~0 SC ST * et'I INE 17TH I i1 r 0 i E r ( I NN O N O Z 16 T j O' 1 w \Z'A" P I thisCr p 2 ro2 00, N `i 5 l C'""z NE I7TH hE 17TH 1- NE 2 { 16TH V ST (OW 20 N HIc:H1.ANtt- j NEa.i J - ST l ST + E11 1• PARK 15TH ST cc Ww w Zw C— 2400 L w 0 ><z '71 oz 014,12344— 405 W z o z W z z z f Idy round. K z Z t= Q•• C/ 5THj<> tlLr*I4 (45+ U z La., < w Z V Z w Z Z > Z > p > m om'...w O w > < i NE v W Z I T ST w <J < < O 0 1 -5 -c11_ Z >Y 14TH iW' > w O ZSSTOtO ] Oz >1 - w O McKNIGHT Z Y NE 14TH NtfnJR.HIGH 1t r NE 13TH h w KP ErVOIrS ST NCO w ZO w f SCHOOL 13 •t 7c;f1,;(1/ 4/.( 5)cro _ w y I SE 00zSwOZwE_Z w IrzwLibraryz -- W z g, Ste_._Zlii NE 12TH n < 5 4 ST < II N ' qi a s NE 1•TH ST 4 4 J u i k. i,1 < z yT/ \ f a z. „, 8 9 AVE f 04 Posf V " < 0 3 2 Office 0‘ Q , NE SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY G f +PARK r N Lo W r 0NE--TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 113JlNitNORTHRENTON O Z H 2 2 ` EINTERCHANGE o NE A tiE , 40IPROJECTED 1989 Aw'DT m LOTH :alC w Z WITH SANTA/TOMBERG P. U. D. NE LOTH ST p <T Tti tip FIGURE 4 4, ii... N _ ,,ono 'C 38 PEAK HOUR 193 IL f 36150 224 4:00 - 5:00 PM NE I2TH ST. WEDNESDAY 362 41-1' 343> DECEMBER 7, 1983 282—> 39—',, oo a ti N 01 cfl i O i N 0 M 2 I L 45 1989 PM PEAKHOURv T230 c-45 W/OUT SANTA/TOMBERG NE I2TH ST.P.U.D. 430 50__9 T 410 > 335--> 45-Th,N O 22 N IA L mi I / 47T-I 1989 PM PEAK HOUR E- 235 1 L 182750 _ r-45 WITH SANTA/TOMBERG NE 12TH ST. 440 415 P.U.D. 60_ ! IT335 45-1, O OMInN N- m SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY TRAFFIC ANALYSTS PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME NE 12TH ST. AT KIRKLAND AVE. NE FIGURE 5 CITY OF RENTON le 0 NARRATIVE JAN 2 7 1984 BUILDING/ZONING DL.F T. SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. RENTON, WASHINGTON Development Statistics: Total Site Area: 48.5 Acres Area to be Developed: 14.6 Acres Area Left Undisturbed: 33.9 Acres Two Story Stacked Flat Units: 140 Townhouse Units: 45 Parking Stalls Required: 278 (1-1/2:1) Parking Stalls Provided: 293 Recreational Amenities: Two swimming pools Two spas Two tennis courts Two tot lots 3100 L.F. pedestrian path 33.9 acres "green" space Outline format from 1983 City of Renton Building Regulations Title IV, 2710-5) A. Vicinity Map (located on site plan sheet). B. (1) Bounding Streets (see site plan and vicinity map). 2) Pedestrian circulation (see site plan, site section, planting concepts, and private street section). Five (5) foot wide walkways are located in front of all parking areas to provide safe and direct access from car to unit. A 3100 foot pedestrian path through the greenbelt provides a link between developments as well as a recreational element for all residents. 3) Building Types and Unit Count (see site plan and development statistics). 4) Off-street Parking (see site plan, private street section, and planting concepts). Vehicular circulation provides convenient and direct access to each unit. Parking stalls are 18 feet long to the curb or wheelstop with provisions for a 2 foot overhang (20 feet total). Each stall is 9 feet wide. All drives are 24 feet wide. Parking areas will be paved with asphalt and planter strips are located every 6 to 9 stalls to break up the paved surfaces. 5) Open Space (see site plan) Common open space required: 592,416 S.F. (13.6 Acres) Common open space provided: 1,572,516 S.F. (36.1 Acres) Private open space required: 64,500 S.F. (1.5 Acres) Private open space provided: 198,111 S.F. (4.6 Acres) Common Open Space" areas are accessible to all project residents and include: swimming pools, tennis courts, tot lots, and surrounding area; pedestrian paths, and all undisturbed "green space." Private Open Space" areas are in addition to parking and storage space and include private decks and patios along with the space immediately adjacent to, and contiguous with, the buildings. C. Landscaping (see site plan and planting concepts). 1) Existing, undisturbed vegetation will be the key landscape element. Additional planting will be used to soften the paved areas, highlight or buffer views, screen private areas, enhance building elevations, and to create a pleasant overall living environment. D. Building Standards: 1) Height - Both building types are two story elements and will be 25 to 30 feet tall as measured from ground level. However, over 80% of the units are situated on downhill slopes and will visually appear as one story elements. (12 to 15 feet high). 2) Bulk - The two story stacked flat units are located in 12 and 18-plex buildings ranging from 10,980 sq. ft. to 16,470 sq. ft. The two story townhouse units are located in 4, 5, and 6-plex buildings ranging from 4300 sq. ft. to 6450 sq. ft. 3) Setbacks - All buildings adjacent to R-1 zoned property are located a minimum of 100 feet from the property line. The only exception is building 'Y' which is 80 feet from an R-2 Zone. E. (1) Program for Development - The project will be developed in a minimum of two (2) separate phases (northeast phase and southwest phase). Construction will take place over a period of five (5) years after the planning and design process is complete. 2) Ownership Pattern - The entire Santa/Tomberg property is under the legal ownership of the Honey Creek Associates, 5611 - 119th S.E. Suite 2, Bellevue, WA 98006. 3) Dwelling Unit Densities - The unit density across the entire site is 3.8 units per acre. This number is less than the density in an R-1 single family residential zone. The specific density breakdowns are as follows: 5 acres of R-2 low density multi-family 12 units/acre) = 60 units 24.8 acres of R-1 single family residential 7200 sq. ft./lot) = 120 units 18.7 acres of G-1 low density general development 35,000 sq. ft./lot) = 5 units Total No. of units allowed = 185 Units 4) Relationship to Comprehensive Plan (see vicinity map) The Comprehensive Plan shows the site divided into three land use categories: R-1 single family, R-2 multi-family, and (G-1) green belt. The proposed development is consistent with these three land uses. 5) Relationship of Site Elements (see site section, site plan, and vicinity map). The steep grades and complex terrain limit development to the northeast corner and the southwest corner of the site. These high plateau areas provide opportunity for dramatic siting, spectacular views, and overall interest and variation within the living environments. The two developed areas are completely separate with individual access points and recreation facilities. They are tied together only by a pedestrian path. Essentially, all the proposed development will be screened from existing properties by dense stands of native trees and understory. An 80 to 100 foot buffer is planned between proposed buildings and the property line. h.gi PIONEER NAT1O c TITLE INSURANCE r" teaierit ; nc.s uu File( nor, roost COMPANY r vil FP Record at t:eet of 1 `b 'Y) Lr3 I. 1,1 I'. AFT c 1[ 7owO JAN 2 7 1984 b: i. RE'•`';I... &.'_EC OM 4 AFTER RECORDING MAIL TOs t(Mti:Cl1Uyr ' i Richard L. Evans: J. 93,0 ,uti065o2E11012N.E. Third St. Kap cOWyn RE. G F r,.0 M 6.. I Bellevue, WA 98004 EXC/Sf Lea 4ID CA • Li. 6.00 1 APR1 1983 # cr713G8r Deed ar:d Purchaser's Assignment of Real EstateContrasRo ti AND WARRANTY THTrGRAN7'O!t MICK C. SANTA and CAROL J. SANTA, husband and wife, fee valet real ed de hereby convey YJ] pc warrant to ROBERT B. TOMBERG and MARLENE K. TOMBERG, husband and wife, an undivided one—half interest as tenants—in—common in w R the following described real s.t aitaseed is the County et King one—half undivided State of Washington iaoinding any/interest therein which grantor may hereafter acquire: 5 . 1. Legal description of real property that is the subject matter of tl.ts De • a::1 Purchaser's Assignment of Real Estate Contract and Warranty is as set fo.ch on Exhibit B attached hereto, reference being made thereto as if incorporated in full IIherein.2. Grantor warrants that said real property is free of encumbrance except for ease- a III liments, restrictions, reservations and conditions of record and is subject to real estate contract in favor of Red Saam Mining Co., recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 8102270553, of which th• grantee aacstmes and aarwow. to f 1ti11 I cwr-half of all caddit3. -,s of saki real estate contract as to said undivided one- half interest, provided that grantee shall be obligated to make the entire real estate contract payment due February 27, 1983, in the ass of $35,000. 3. This deed and assignment is subject to the following terms and conditions that are set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto, reference being made to said Exhibit A as if iroarporated in full herein. an1/ and de hereby assign,transfer and sin ewer to the tw1 a ooatrad2at4t i 4" 1981February betweea Red Sams Mining Co., a Washington corporation, ae aell.r ad Mick C. Santa and Carol J. Santa, husband and wife, itusztheeer for the.sue and peril eee of the adore described real 'ITse to a tsaad agree w to qran g u v rrfr of tteer ppayment cgrantee of all of estate p yymenteueins brm 00. 912 dh of Bch 1983. f i?1 fl- 41 ow, ORAL) t sass.) CAROL . SANTA STAR OF WASHINGTON, Geary KING se. f• thion n day parsoesllf appears dermfee Mick C. Santa and Carol J. Santa bows ie be the isdhidual s described is sad who waded the within sad foregoing is.eramest, andjrYao"eriot they.{Sail the gam se their free d Yolistsri act and deed,for the diesels t •• GIVEN men my bead and Bide).sal this 9 t h day et March 1983. a i; Nary NU.a and*d. Saes el rain u nr. :`.` read get °e11evue Al- Y r x h.'i EXHIBIT A ATTACHMENT TO i DEED AND PURCHASER'S ASSIGNMENT OF REAL ESTATE CONTRACT AND WARRANTY BETWEEN' MICK C. SANTA AND CAROL J. SANTA, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS GRANTORS AND ROBERT B. TOMBERG AND MARLENE K. TOMBERG, HUSBAND AND WIFE,1 Ay ORANTI ES e Said additional terms and conditions are as follows: 1 1. Grantee shall pay to grantor the sum of $40,000, with interest thereon commencing as of March 9, 1983, at the rate of i 121 per annum, on a declining balance, grantee having righttoi prepay without penalty. Payments shall be $400 per month, or more, commencing April 9, 1983, and on the 9th day of each and every month thereafter consecutively, provided that the entire balance, principal and accrued interest, shall be paid in full on or before March 9, 1984. t Payments shall be made to grantor at 4444 Issaquah-Pine Lake Road, 77 Issaquah, WA 98027. Said $40,000 shall be secured by a mortgage which is hereby granted as a condition of acceptance of this deed and purchaser's assignment of real estate contract and warranty on the undivided one-half interest of grantee in and to the real roperty described in Exhibit B and against the real property that t is owned by grantee, located at 2061-144 S.E. , Bellevue, Washington, r the legal description of said property to be supplied by grantee, and in the event of failure of grantee to supply said legal description, then grantor may supply the same and insert in this agreement as if originally a party hereof. Said mortgage against said two parcels of real property securing said $40,000 shall be on Pioneer National Title insurance Polio L52, reference beingmade hereto as if in- corporated herein. In the event that said monthly installment as provided for herein is not paid when due, the whole sum, both principal and accrued interest shall become due and payable without 1 further notice at option of grantor. If said indebtedness is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or if suit is brought to collect the principal or interest, then grantee shall pay a reason- y able attorney's fee. Grantee shall execute said mortgage in favor 4 of grantor against said real property within ten days of date of recording hereof and failure to do so shall be a breach of the terms of the agreement and the entire indebtedness, including accrued interest, shall immediately become due and payable at option of grantor. Said mortgage as recorded shall reference this instrument as the indebtedness secured thereby unless grantee z elects to execute an installment promissory note containing the same terms and conditions. 4 2. Additional consideration to grantor for this conveyance is the agreement and right of grantor to receive and be paid $90,000 of proceeds of sale from first materials of any type extracted from the real property described in Exhibit B, which shall be additional consideration to grantor, free and clear cf any expenses and being a net figure to grantor. Provided, howe'P'r, that this right to receive the first $90,000 of proceeds of said material is on con- dition (1) that the grantor and grantee, as tenants-in-common, hereafter mutually agree to use said property as a "gravel pit" and rem. TorM'a K (2) all necessary permits and zoning for extraction are obtained. 444/*44.44 The terms and conditic..-s of this Paragraph 2 are subject to the AM <11 terms and conditions as set furth in Paragraph 3. sue-.A...a.-...,. '"`7».Y_— _ s A r 1 3. In the event that grantor and grantee are unable to agree that said real property should be mined as a "gravel pit" or if they are linable for any reason to obtain zoning and/or extraction permits as required under Paragraph 2, or for any reason grantor and grantee are unable to sell materials mined from said property, then :n lieu of said $90,000 of first pro- i ceeds from the sale of srid material, grantor shall be paid, from the first proceeds of any type, kind or natur6, to which grantee would otherwise be entitled, from grantee's one-half interest in said property described in Exhibit B, each party as tenant-in-common to otherwise share equally one-half of the proceeds of said property, each having an undivided one-half interest in said property. Said $25,000 obligation from the grantee's one-half interest in said property shall be against 1 the property only and shall be due and payable only when the property is sold, and no recourse shall exist against grantee personally and said payment is subject to the condition precedent that the sales price of grantee's undivided one-half interest must p exceed a gross sales price of $270,000 (total sale $540,000) . eon Grantor shall be secured to said additional consideration by a I. mortgage against grantee's undivided one-half interest in said real property and all profits appurtenant thereto, said mortgage to be in the form and style as set forth in Pioneer National t Title Insurance Company Form L52, which obligation shall be due and payable at time of sale of said property, however, if at time of sale the net proceeds that would otherwise be available to grantee are less than $25,000, then all proceeds of sale and the first proceeds received aftcr closing, from said sale, shall I fr! 11 be first applied toward said $25,000 obligation, before any distributions or payments are made to ytaniee, whereupon said I IL mortgage shall be satisfied and released by grantor. No interest shall accrue on said $25,000 obligation. 4. Notwithstanding the taking of title to the subject real property described in Exhibit B as tenants-in-common, the parties intend to hereafter enter into a joint venture agreement on terms and conditions as hereafter are agreed to between said parties. It is a further condition and agreement of this grant that the grantee will ___ume and pay ore-half of all title transfer coat! associated etwithrecordingofthisinstrument. j it 5. Grantee by recording this instrument through grantee's IlltauthorizedagentassentsandagreestoalltermsandconditionsE hereof. I 1 11. s2iE0. 1' it 4 Ain Ns. EXHIBIT "B" Order No. i09974 DESCRIPTION: Tha South 346 feet of the North 1131.4 feet of the East 555.64 feet 4 of the Northwest k; ALSO the South 393.2 feet of the West 555.64 feet of the East 1111.28feetoftheNortheastkoftheNorthwestk• EXCEPT the North 292.7 feet of the West 554.64 feet thereof; ALSO the South 292.7 feet of the North 1078 feet of the West 554.64feetoftheEast1111.28 feet of the Northeast k of the Northwest k; ALSO the South 27 feet of the North 785.4 feet of the West 554.64feettheLac. 1111.28 feet of the Northeast k of the Northwest k;EXCEPT County Road; ALSO the South 392.7 feet of the North 785.4 feet of the West 555.64feetoftheEast1111.28 feet of the Northeast k of the Northwest k; EXCEPT the South 27 feet of the West 554.64 feet thereof ALLinSection4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. ; EXCEPT from all of the foregoing:xe t il That portion of the East 1111.28 feet of the Northeast k oftheNorthwestkofSection4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , lying Westerly of 120th Place S .E. and Northerly of S.E. 97th Str...et; IT S AND ALSO the Southeast k of the Northwest k; YCEPT port " lying North of line beginning on the East line oftheNorthwestk. 1131.4 feet South of the Northeast corner ofsaidNorthwestk; thence West to point on the West line of the East k of the Northwestit1132feetSouthoftheNorthwestcornerofsaidNortheast.k oftheNorthwestk; EXCEPT portion lying within S.E. 97th Street, ALL in Section 4, Townshipt23North, Range 5 East, W.M. ; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. i s E i i 1 1 1 37C.7/ 370) 393.E 6128 r -(709.70) 185.07 1 NA, L 12 rN t96.3S l/ 28 2 71.81 1/ SO 946 et'.5/ I 2 3 4 5) 8 q ti?`" 50. t. ] i!iAzic° 961 - `'‘' 6' 1' 64 72.30 r.` k6 723 71.3 , S 34 ''•!'., 99 24TH ST. s R REl9.s1 7® 7 \ • & • q. 7Cze73 a`rJ 34 3 • 504 /b1 I. 5ql1618 17 16 ^ 15 p, 14 13 12 I W 10t` 1 72.23 12.3/% ' 72.3/ 72 29 95" 86.38 Z 66 73 79 80 74 66 62 6/ 64 /0396 34 O 29 28 27 26 w 25 • 24 23 22 21 19 18 hR . D W • 0 v P V B 6 93 73.81 79.14 802/ 74 3 °6-j54 • . 2/ F;3045$ I 936023RDP19# 7146 71 711 533/7 ,6 17 '^ 7.35 •H , E 5917 ..0 ,gt •50 • N M 7 14 " N 7 b 1 t! CO78 • 9 10 • ^ I1 12 13 50 14 15 `a 16 1 O 7 e 72 6827 , 55 ,i> ` 55 8894 8789 E. n c7: v III it ,1 Ili oJames F. Chandler Red Somm Mining Co. N N m r...-_- n N Z,22I5 NO r[.187 III N • ; n ,, /15.05 I 1 0.33Ac 0.33Ac.0.33k."' I j r(.139 i[. Y 66 7t.16, I I JII 0.38Ac. 0.384c z I j I 22C0 s 1.43Ac. 7o rt./9e u.199 $ 0.26Ac. ` 7[24C7. i rn•ZOo r/ 'e8300II r . 70 70 1/5.05 15 , 180 4101 0.59 130 75005 I 25 :25 31.09 r[ 1 I es 18 CI.8 63 >64 140 7( I z Imo:C ^F. a7ao 2125 f' Fatr4N0.65Ac. 0175 Ac-I . 7/ '? 1.).' 0.64 Ac. 4 rt./66 rt./67 It./68 7Y.2/6 r 6 I -, 1 l-- , n 63 64 130 149.40 (c -- i9570 60. - N.E.'"4-2-IV 309:J_ J -'" 43- aO3ri = 411 00 6251 61.51 6250 6251 801j7i.2n 13?56__ 3 264 2 p a V O 2.15 { Ih 71 21 19 7L. .22 r- r 752 (I) (2) ('S) (4) •..•// 1•u. ..._i LL__II/20 _ S.P•023,77 do 23990 23.8 ZO //9:/2 //3.2£ /07.94 ` V.35 84.2 60 11J.73F i0 7454 72,75 42.66\ 17/42 7/J.2o a /2 2 n I 3 4 Nv 2013 oi.. " 201 Z .no •3 4 5 am r' I-- " , o ,, I o) 1.") 0, sz8 snz b288 o r, • , 0 Chester J. 2.22Ac. 8 4 7 E;y o 3 XSHartsockT.L.Sr v . I 119' tr 02 5 9\ ,• vq0 f ` tl c' $ >4o os• a 8 y rJ E 6S b \ N R W Q - tam' 4, H "'- h v- \ N• O o dal G `_ 39s zz R \ I 3 o A 5 r 13 . 13 Jo...& ' • . ,v ".., ' gf) ,‘ • r'\ 1 . i\ec: P• te) i rl 33.6/ 9' 9 ye• ti at sJ e 9 3 ~ 0 2 3 n IZ If, `a; 1 A'\\^/ ,44 A,o P• C'l - h^•)', -. 2 loot ^ T.1.24 ff. 3 Z `1 10'.0 t\ I \ o t T.L.98T® `2T 12a.• J r Oti 50 n 069 8 a cy ,3q v '' 4 52.G 5 c• 4. - 1 z,` 1'j Z A B 9 9'Uac' 5' Q O c,, 5 P. Sandra J. Miller cb 4-9.90 R NG 11 o. • o pg. 2.214c. Q643 1 i 111 6D W 0 1 H 181 G m cr) zc.,'_3 ro 1 P ? ti 1 1 U Nill 50 7//2 Z\ m Via, w % 1 ` 1 2)I* 3 AL- '" Z I , -- 1 4, 151- . I o I) N _ iK UT! (smYso \ - 1 1 1 3 z T R AC 5 1 T. e IO 1 , 77tog I° 3 5 1 Z. r- m 18 VA S1ep 1 / so I S. Rio. 08501. 1 1 1 n c, O O a• N N.E ep IEL. •• 311. :V. W 1 , ' 3 A 1 t 3101 4 A7' 35.92 > 1 11 to 1` CS t` I m NE.18TN O 0.74 AC. r Q ii \ ‘ ., '' 1 011N o N T.1.143ty• 1 + 11 11 o O I no 4 ( 11 1 soo NINON g', s` 07 North Highlands tr^ 3o rtexq 1.05Ac. 1 ro m 11 , 1` C 1 " 5 Q n y l7\' ZZlB9 774.286 Ville U a 5 \ 1 a f e\ a, -- -TIED L T Q i d,frt 6 TH g O 60 Co o Op 3a14 -- 10 13 1.05 Ac. s I/z. i.,., r` d , 1 Park 195. 4 6 O N T4/08 105 I FT 1 t1<. c LJ001,.II 4 0 35„„.,_ is 2'2 N c37 •1 C '^ b I S 20 h o K 7c cs.76 ^•+ r ti` es ` Q J # E3 15I b 60 o` A b"' s \''' Q` sc 12 3 a9 • y r, 777s 77 105. 73 9 NSF,` Nr 15' lips .tj411_1 7-.742 70.9j N 1$ O N11I11.4 1,0• 4, r `,33c 3s 4, /03 o ` • l ` • yh .top \ Sr I\' g ..\N ^ 18 b 31515 75 5 ,, ` i ` 0 TO: Q G / DAT FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: 7 J. el— / ce—0/.Fs Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition _ . ,-.. . Map Deed u L_I,\ Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants Verify Content a-e-,'l Ci THANK YOU! Requested by: s HONEY CREEK PPUD ACCESS Chronology Planning and Development Committee June 30, 1988 March 4, 1985 Original PPUD submittal proposed primary access on Jefferson Avenue NE, secondary access on NE 21st Street, and a 20-foot wide, gated emergency access at NE 23rd Street. Hearing Examiner denied the PPUD based on inaccurate density calculations. January 1, 1986 PPUD resubmitted proposing primary access on Jefferson Avenue NE, secondary access on NE 21st Street, and a 20-foot wide, gated emergency access at NE 23rd Street. Hearing Examiner recommended the elimination of the entry at 21st Street, and required the applicant to bear the cost of upgrading the access roads. April 14, 1986 Planning and Development Committee indicated concerns regarding access to the proposed PPUD. The Committee stated that, "...full street improvements on a 40-foot public right-of- way alignment with NE 23rd Street are necessary to provide necessary access to the development." The Council required the "...dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue NE and the site, with an engineering report and specifications for full street improvement as required by City Code." May 12, 1986 At the public hearing on the 75% annexation petition, Council confirmed the elimination of the entry at NE 21st Street and the requirement of a 40-foot wide right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street. If the additional 20 feet of right-of-way on the south side of NE 23rd Street cannot be acquired, the Council reaffirmed that the development will not be allowed to proceed. September 8, 1986 Honey Creek Associates requested Council assistance in meeting the NE 23rd Street right-of-way condition. City Attorney Larry Warren reported that, although the matter had been discussed in Council Committee, the requirement for full-width right-of-way had been approved by Council without clarification of whether the City would aid in the condemnation procedures, if necessary. Council referred the matter to the City Attorney for preliminary assistance in the condemnation proceedings. October 19, 1987 Honey Creek Associates representative Bob Tomberg voluntarily agreed to follow the revised PUD timelines, predicated on the condemnation of NE 23rd Street. City Attorney Larry Warren advised Council that the condemnation proceedings would be at the developer's expense. March 7, 1988 Transportation Committee concurred in the Public Works Department's recommendation to require a 28-foot street section face-of-curb to face-of-curb with a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side on NE 23rd Street. A minimum 20-foot right-of-way will be required on the south plus additional footage for slope easements, if deemed necessary. Council concurred in the Committee's recommendation. April 4, 1988 City Attorney Larry Warren requested authorization to prepare an ordinance authorizing the condemnation of NE 23rd Street right-of-way. The matter was referred to the Ways and Means Committee. April 18, 1988 The condemnation ordinance was read before the City Council and referred back to Ways and Means until the City Attorney can negotiate a contract with Honey Creek Associates addressing the developer's responsibility for the condemnation costs. June 20, 1988 Honey Creek Associates representative Bob Tomberg requested a change in the Honey Creek PPUD to provide emergency access along NE 23rd Street instead of full access due to a pending lawsuit by a resident opposing the acquisition of the roadway property. Council referred the matter to the Planning and Development Committee. ct:dsk3c:hcpd N (VI PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Honey Creek PUD The committee met twice on the Honey Creek PUD, with the last meeting being held on December 7 , 1989 . The committee was to meet on the access problems concerning the project, particularly the inability to expand N.E . 23rd to a full city street. The committee was to assess alternative street plans . The committee was presented with the following street plan which the developer has agreed to: Emergency Access . The city owns twenty feet of right-of-way on the extension of N.E . 23rd. The fire department has indicated that that is sufficient right-of-way to build emergency access . There are two reasons why twenty feet of paved surface are not necessary. First, the twenty feet of paved surface normally anticipates two-way traffic . There will be one-way traffic only. Second, there will be no structures adjacent to the twenty foot emergency access so there will be no need for the fire department to stop its vehicle and set it up to fight fires , an additional reason why twenty foot access is normally desirable . For these reasons, there is more than adequate right-of- way available with twenty feet, even if the developer is required to build retaining walls . Street Improvements : 1 . The developer will improve the road on its project to city standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots . It is anticipated that the road will be dedicated to the city. 2 . The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E . from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E . , as follows : a. Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs , gutters , sidewalks and street lighting. b. Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E . and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E . which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors . 1 Planning and Develor_.._nt Committee Report Honey Creek PUD 3 . The developer will install the following school safety improvements : a . A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E . on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E . with appropriate signing should be required. b . Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E . , south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E . to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. The developer has indicated that it wishes to replace several of the buildings on the project and the staff has indicated that it believes that this is a major modification to the PUD. The Planning and Development Committee believes that the project has gone through so many changes and the council has received so much information that a full compilation of what has occurred needs to be undertaken. Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council recommends as follows : 1 . A staff report shall be prepared setting forth the factual background of this PPUD and establishing findings of fact, conclusions, and a proposed decision. The format used shall be essentially that used by the hearing examiner . 2 . The staff ' s proposal will be tendered to the city council and the council will establish a public hearing date on the modifications to the PUD and the proposed changes to the traffic plan . 3 . The staff report will be presented to the hearing examiner at the same time it is presented to the city council . The hearing examiner shall have two weeks to review the report for completeness and accuracy and make recommendations to the city council, if any, for additions, corrections , or deletions to the proposed staff report . DATED: December 11, 1989 . John Reed, Chairman Nancy Mathews Kathy Keolker-Wheeler LJW: as . CITY8 : 11 . 2 r 4 v • 5 S tip .. ti y I.. ' y.. \ F;3'.- M r .yi ay. r i i r, x' - 4, i\A 4 e t, t - set Y1 , k,tpfr kt,, 1. $0r:.. „_,.jj i, t. ,It ", r //. y r v- t%4,rJa Y r . f 0' er t ht "°. r am, _ ., J l'. s... if 1• HONEY CREEK PPUD ACCESS Chronology Planning and Development Committee June 30, 1988 1 f y March 4, 1985 Original PPUD submittal proposed primary access on Jefferson Avenue NE,secondary access on NE 21st Street,and a 20-foot wide,gated emergency access at NE 23rd Street. 4°''' Hearing Examiner denied the PPUD based nn inaccurate density calculations. 1 j January 1, 1986 PPUD resubmitted proposing primary access on Jefferson q venue NE,secondary access on NE 21st Street,and a 20-foot t wide,gated emergency access at NE 23rd Street. hh Hearing Examiner recommended the elimination of the entry S, li µ-. * ,at 21st Street,and required the applicant to bear the cost of upgrading the access roads. April 14, 1986 Planning and Development Committee indicated concerns regarding access to the proposed PPUD. The Committee stated that,'...full street improvements on a 40-foot public right- of- way alignment with NE 23rd Street are necessary to provide necessary access to the development.'The Council required the'...dedication of a full 40-foot wide 7 'right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue NE and the site,with an engineering report and 4 specifications for full street improvement as required by City Code.'May 12, 1986 At the public hearing on the 75%annexation petition, Council confirmed the elimination of the entry at NE 21st Street and the requirement of a 40-foot wide right-of-way aligned with i;NE 23rd Street. If the additional 20 feet of right-of-way on the south side of NE 23rd Street cannot be acquired, the Council reaffirmed that the development will not be allowed to proceed.September 8, 1986 Honey Creek Associates requested Council assistance in meeting the NE 23rd Street right-of-way condition. City Attorney Larry Warren reported that, although the matter had been discussed in Council Committee, the requirement forifull-width right-of-way had been approved by Council without clarification of whether the City would aid in the condemnation procedures, if necessary. Council referred the matter to the City Attorney for preliminary assistance in the ma w> condemnation proceedings. ti 4% r ,iiik 1 y sift:i I. 7.-:. l Apr y ; . t:.,..,,,,....,,.,,,,,„...... ..,.,..\ .1 4,44 4 ,,,,, v,,, xvv,•k 7- 1 , I • t l ws.. . October 19, 1987 Honey Creek Associates representative Bob Tomberg qr voluntarily agreed to follow the revised PUD timelines, predicated on the condemnation of NE 23rd Street. CityAttorneyLarryWarrenadvisedCouncilthatthecondemnation proceedings would be at the developer's expense. March 7, 1988 Transportation Committee concurred in the PublicWorksDepartment's recommendation to require a 28-footstreetsectionface-of-curb to face-of-curb with a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side on NE 23rd Street. A minimum 20-foot yright-of-way will be required on the south plusadditionalfootageforslopeeasements, if deemed neceKt2ry. Council concurred in the Committee's recommendation. 4 .. April 4, 1988 City Attorney Larry Warren requested authorization toprepareanordinanceauthorizingthecondemnationofNE23rdStreetThematterwasreferredtotheWaysandk, right-oC-way. n- Means Committee. April 18, 1988 The condemnation ordinance was read before the CityCouncilandreferredbacktoWaysandMeansuntiltheCityAttorney can negotiate a contact with Honey Creek Associates l addressing the developer's responsibility for the condemnation costs. June 20, 1988 Honey Creek Associates representative Bob Tomberg requestedachangeintheHoneyCreekPPUDtoprovideemergency access along NE 23rd Street instead oft full accessacG due to the pending lawsuit by a residentopposingroadwayproperty. Council referred the matter to the Planning and Development Committee. a ct:dsk3c:hcpd r.. s f . ji ti',iiI YJ r 4 CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean - Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell Assistant City Attorneys April 15, 1988 Mr. Michael M. Hanis Attorney at Law 3900 East Valley Highway, Suite 203 Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Mitch Murray Request for Reopening of Appeal Time Dear Mike: The city council has asked me to respond to your letter asking that the appeal time be reopened on the council's decision to allow forty feet of right-of-way to serve for N.E. 23rd Street. The city believes that the appeal time need not be reopened as there has been no final council action to this date. The appeal would be from a condition of approval of a preliminary planned unit development. Our i ity code requires that the preliminary planned unit development be approved by ordinance, similar to a rezone. There is an appeal time from that type of a decision. The appeal is to superior court. There is no appeal right to any city body from a city council condition on a preliminary planned unit development. The only recourse is to King County Superior Court. The city code details the applicable time limit for appeal. The time for appeal would begin to run upon final adoption of the ordinance by the Renton City Council. I hope this adequately answers your inquiry. Ver ruly yours, Lawrence . Warren LJW:as. cc: Mayor 1 074-T,?, 6.1.f Council Members 1t7 ,c lv Cct.`L ` Dick Houghton 1.} I Lk? ir`t. 4( Ron Nelson 1 l pia) V Larry Springer G (yN(.vYllCti`` j `Gt,' lcL;j'` l+ N8.22:66. I/ I J j ay.& CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.4143 3 An ordinance of the City of Renton, d Washington, approving a preliminary d planned unit development (PPUD-015-84 d —Honey Creek Associates) Whereas a petition for the approval of a preliminary planned unit development for a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located in the City of Renton, has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department;and Whereas a preliminary planned unit AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION development has been approved by the City Council following an appeal from the recommendation for approval from the hearing Examiner after publichearingAudreybannerbeingfirstdulyswornonoathstatesthereonasprovidedbylaw,and that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Whereas it was necessary to annex this property to the City of Renton before approving this planned unit development, and said annexation having been accom- VALLEY DAILY NEWS Wished,and Whereas the applicant for this prelimi- Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition nary planned unit development has volun- tarily agreed to the time limits for submittal Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers [ of the final plan for the planned unit devel- opmentarelegalnewspapersandarenowandhavebeenformorethansixpursuantCityCodeSectiong4-2711.6.A of the City code predicted on months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published [ the fact that the time taken by the City to in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ) condemn a portion of N.E. 23rd Street will County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal I tion b not y theCityofothistthat ime Iparcelimit. fthe tw year newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for I " clock" will resume and the two year time limit l King County. The City Council of the CiyrofoRenton, Washington,do ordain as follows: The notice in the exact form attached,waspublished in the Kent EditionSectiondevelopment The preliminary planned unit pertaining to the following Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition and not in described property is approved: supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers See Ex t " o attached hereto rth made a pa( See rt hereeof as if fully set forth during the below stated period.The annexed notice a herein) Said property located in the vicinity of Oroinance No. 4143 the 2200 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Dev- was published on Ail r i 1 8, 19 8 6 it 2 8 9 3 il's Elbow) Section II: The land uses of the prelimi- nary planned unit development are low density single family residential dwellings, RThefullamountofthefeechargedforsaidforegoingpublicationisthefamily and R-2 low to mediumin , density whichwimultllgggresidentialdwellings, uses will 0 result in a maximum of 72 units within this lsumof $ planned unit development. Section III:The effective date of the pre- liminary planned unit development approval is the effective date of this Ordinance, being thirty days after publication.The date of expiration of the appeal shall be pursu- ant to Section 4-2711.6.A which will be two years from the date of approval, subject to Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 t hday of Apr i 1 19 8 8 a one year extension if request from and approved by the Hearing Examiner. Section IV:The time taken by the City to condemn a portion of N.E. 23rd Street will fr,/ not only apply to the time limit. Upon acqui- sition of that parcel the two year "clock" e/ will resume and the two year time limit will Notar ublic for the State of Washington be cumulative. g Section V:This Ordinance shall be effec- residing at Federal Way, tive upon its passage, approval and thirty days after publication. King County, Washington. Passed by the City Council this 4th day of April, 1988. VON#87 Revised 11,86 Maxine E.Motor v I ,r, ... . a:, CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney mil Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean - Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Eontcs - Robert L. Sewell Assistant City Attorneys April 7, 1988 TO: Mayor, Council Members FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney t RE: PPUI? 015-84 Honey Creek Associates Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: I have before me a letter written by Michael Ilanis on behalf of Mitch Murray. In that letter there is a request that the appeal time be reopened. Apparently Mr. Murray or Mr. Ilanis believes that the council decision concerning the road width can be appealed to the council once again. The City Council's decision is not appealable to the council itself, but rather must be appealed to King County Superior Court. The same time limits for appeal to King County Superior Court exist for the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Ordinance, and I do not see that any additional appeal time would be necessary. I also have had an opportunity to review the rather extensive city files, while preparing the Ordinance on the Honey Creek Associates PPUD. The language in the file concerning prior City Council action establishing the 40 foot right-of-way was consistent with the decision made by the City Council just recently in handling Mr. Murray's request. It would not appear to me that anything has changed. I also wonder why it has taken so long to request the council to take this further step to reopen the appeal time. Mr. Murray originally made that request to the council members and no action was taken on that request. If the council feels that the decision deviates markedly from the prior council decision to Mr. Murray's surprise and detriment, then it would be fair to reopen the appeal time. If this decision is consistent with the council's previous actions, then it would not be appropriate to open the appeal time. However, as previously explained, the appeal is not to the council but to the superior court, and it can be made as part of a _challenge to the council's Ordinance on the Preliminary Planned Unit Development. i! Lawrence J. % arren LJW:as. A 8.22:01. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 J RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting April 11, 1988 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF ROBERT J. HUGHES, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, THOMAS COUNCIL MEMBERS W. TRIMM, RICHARD M. STREDICKE. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER AND TONI NELSON BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk PRESS Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 11, 1988, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At Council request, Consent Agenda Item 4.e. regarding Honey Creek PPUD was removed for separate consideration. Condemnation: Oakesdale City Attorney requested ordinance to commence condemnation proceedings to Avenue (Bitney Property) acquire right-of-way for Oakesdale Avenue, I-405 to SW 16th Street, Bitney property. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See later action.) Annexation: North Soos City Clerk submitted petitions containing 86 signatures from residents of Creek (Fair wood) Lake Desire area and 31 signatures from Fairwood-Soos Creek area opposing inclusion of the area in Soos Creek Annexation boundaries. Refer to Community Services Committee. Utility: Code Revision for Finance Department requested ordinance clarifying City Code Section Mandatory Connection to 8-702(d) and 8-703(5) to resolve conflict in requirements regarding Sewers mandatory connection to sewers. Refer to Utilities Committee. Streets: CBD Decorative Community Services Committee concurred with Public Works Department Lighting recommendation to remove Central Business District decorative lighting and revise Main Street lighting in two to three year phasing program, and requested staff to submit funding as part of 1989 budget. Council concur. Streets: Street Lighting Community Services Committee requested preparation of Street Lighting Ordinance Ordinance to define street lighting. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Streets: Street Lighting Community Services Committee recommended concurrence in Street Lighting Curtailment Program Curtailment Program to curtail street lighting in the event of energy shortage. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appeal: Service Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed regarding Service Corporation of Corporation of America America Special Permit, SP-076-87, for fill and grade at 350 Monroe Avenue Special Permit, SP-076-87 NE. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Removed Item: Letter was read from Michael M. Hanis, 3900 East Valley Highway, Renton, PUD: Preliminary, Honey attorney for Mitch Murray, requested that appeal period for the Honey Creek Creek, PPUD-015-8 4,_PPUD be reopened for the limited purpose of determining right-of-way and Condemnation road improvement conditions for NE 23rd Street, Honey Creek PPUD-015- 84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER LETTER TO ADMINISTRATION SO LEGAL DEPARTMENT CAN RESPOND TO LETTER. (It was noted that appeal challenging the PUD Ordinance should be filed with King County Superior Court rather than City Council.) CARRIED. (See later action.) CITY OF RENTON HANIS & OLSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW APR 5 1988 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 WIAY()R+COFFICERENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 MICHAELM.HANIS 206)251-9313 GARY O.OLSON JAMES D.CAYCE,ASSOCIATEDCOUNSEL ANNETTE DELGADO,LEGAL ASSISTANT April 5 , 1988 TO: The Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer City Council Members 2.00 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: PPUD - 015 - 84 Honey Creek Associates Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council : On behalf of Mitch Murray , this office previously requested clarification regarding access on N.E. 23rd Street to the Honey Creek Associates ' planned unit development. We have been advised that the Council ' s decision is that a 40 foot right-of-way is sufficient. We did not get an answer to our specific question whether a 40 foot right-of-way is consistent with the Council ' s decisional language requiring "full street improvement as required by City Code. " As you are aware, it is our position that it is not possible to meet the Council ' s requirement in 40 feet, the City' s ordinances only allowing 40 foot rights-of-way for one-way hillside roads . Mr . Murray had a legitimate expectation that the road to be constructed behind his home to serve this PPUD would be to City standards - one that would be of sufficient capacity and design to serve the needs of this new development without adverse impacts to his neighborhood. Had he known that something other than a city street meeting Renton' s ordinances was contemplated, he would have appealed that issue . The Council ' s belated decision that something less than the specific language of its decision would be allowed has deprived Mr . Murray of that appeal opportunity. This letter is to request that the appeal period be re-opened for the limited purpose of determining the right-of-way and road improvement conditions for N . E . 23rd Street . Mr . Murray has important information to present to the Council on the impacts to The Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer City Council Members April 5 , 1988 Page Two his neighborhood of a substandard street. We note that at its meeting of March 21 , 1988 , (we did not receive the Minutes until March 28) the Council refused to pass an ordinance approving the Honey Creek PPUD pending receipt of additional information regarding calculation of densities . This same type of review within the context of a public hearing would be particularly important to the issues Mr. Murray has raised with regard to N.E. 23rd. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours , HAN:IS & OLSON Michael M. Hanis mmh: imw cc : Larry Warren L /rc% p 0 CITY OF RENTON 1 ' FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 13 , 1988 Honey Creek Associates Attn: Mr . Tomberg & Mr . Santa 5611 119th S. E . , Suite #2 Bellevue, Washington 98006 RE : Honey Creek Associates/PPUD-015-84 Ordinance No. 4143 Dear Mr . Tomberg and Mr . Santa : The referenced preliminary planned unit development was finalized by the Renton City Council on April 4 , 1988, by adoption of Ordinance No . 4143 . A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your files . If we can be of further assistance in this matter , please feel free to call . Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E . Motor , CMC City Clerk Enclosure cc : Mr . John L . Hendrickson, Shidler McBroom Gates & Lucas Mr . Mel Easter , Johnson Braund Design Group Building & Zoning Department Hearing Examiner Policy Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 rfaP April 11, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 115 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4148 An ordinance was read authorizing the acquisition of certain property and Condemnation: Panther property rights by eminent domain providing for the payment thereof, Creek Wetlands authorizing the City Attorney to prepare a petition for condemnation in the Superior Court in and for the County of King and for the prosecution thereof for the acquisition of such property and property right for acquisition and preservation of Panther Creek Wetlands and amending Ordinance No. 4014 by adding additional properties. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4149 An ordinance was read authorizing the acquisition of certain property and Condemnation: Oakesdale property rights by eminent domain providing for the payment thereof; Avenue (Bitney Property) authorizing the City Attorney to prepare a petition for condemnation in the Superior Court in and for the County of King and for the prosecution thereof for the acquisition of such property and property rights for right-of- way purposes and utilities; Bitney, Oakesdale Avenue. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following ordinances for first reading: LID: 330, Grady Way An ordinance was read approving and confirming the assessments and Project assessment roll of Local Improvement District No. 330 for widening the Final Assessment Roll roadway to 56 feet curb to curb, construction and installation of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, water lines, street lights, traffic control and other necessary appurtenances in the vicinity of SW Grady Way from Lind Avenue SW west to the Grady Way bridge, Renton, King County, Washington, by doing all work necessary on connection therewith, levying and assessing the amounts therefor against the several lots, tracts, parcels of land and other property as shown on said assessment roll as confirmed by the City Council; and providing for the payment of such assessments into the Local Improvement Fund, District No. 330 of the City of Renton, Washington, as created by Ordinance No. 3890. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Summary ordinance on this matter will be presented on 4/18/88. Annexation: Honey An ordinance was read authorizing the acquisition of certain property and Creek, NE 23rd Street property rights by eminent domain providing for the payment thereof; Condemnation authorizing the City Attorney to prepare a petition for condemnation in the Superior Court in and for the County of King and for the prosecution thereof for the acquisition of such property and property rights for roadway purposes (Honey Creek Associates). MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Annexation: Covenant An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Church Rezone along the side of SE Carr Road between Talbot Road South and 104th Avenue SE (if extended) to R-1, single family residential, classification; Covenant Church Annexation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Resolution #2716 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor to enter into an interlocal Police: Jail Contract with cooperative agreement for jail services with the City of Yarrow Point, Yarrow Point Washington. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 11, 1988 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance Amending Ordinance #4014 Authorization to Proceed with Friendly Condemnation on the Bitney Property The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Ordinance Approving Assessments re Construction of LID #330 (Grady Way Project) Ordinance Authorizing Acquisition of Property through Condemnation for Roadway Purposes - NE 23rd Street Rezone of Covenant Church Annexation - located along the side of SE Carr Road between Talbot Rd S. & 104th Ave SE (if extended) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Jail Contract with the City of Yarrow Point, Washington APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 39719 through No. 40072 in the amount of $1, 366, 163 .72 , having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 39726 - 39735 machine voided. d0T- r-14,L Richard Stredicke, Chair Rob WHughe ef-4ic s4 1/ Jz--')-- Nanc Mat April 4. 1988 Renton City Council Minute Page 105 Citizen Comment: Post, George Post, 1122 S. 27th Place, Renton; Bruce Hanninen, 1114 S. 22nd Hanninen, Leibman, Court, Renton; Kathy Leibman, 1022 S. 22nd Court, Renton; and Jeff Lukins - Victoria Hills Lukins, 1113 S. 23rd Street, Renton, President of Victoria Hills Homeowners' Phase II FPUD-042-85 Association, addressed the Council regarding the Victoria Hills Phase II Final Planned Unit Development. Mr. Post referenced letter and videotape submitted as documentation of mudslides in December, January and March indicating that property damage had been caused from storm water erosion from the hillside behind residences. Residents questioned why the project has not been completed within two year time period established by code; questioned when final plans would be submitted for the project; and asked how the City plans to respond to apparent violations of City ordinances and the Environmental Impact Statement by the developer. Also reported were failure of the developer to contact residents to discuss damage from mudslides; failure of the developer to monitor the site on an on-going basis for erosion and potential mudslides; necessity for residents to sandbag slope during heavy storm; and necessity for residents to acquire additional insurance. Mayor and Council members were asked to force the developer to complete the project in a timely manner, and questioned when storm drainage system on Puget Drive and Benson would be repaired. Public Works Director Richard Houghton explained his understanding that one year remains before the FPUD expires; advised that the developer has submitted third set of plans for approval, noting need for resubmission of grading plans; and reported that staff is ready to approve sanitary sewer plans, which are required before additional buildings can be started. He assured that City inspectors have been monitoring the site and have recommended remedial repairs on the sloped areas to protect property owners from damage. Councilwoman Mathews requested a staff report which addresses construction timetables, permit expiration dates, and timing for clean-up of properties. RECESS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 9:50 p.m. Council reconvened at 10:02 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. AUDIENCE COMMENT Helen Shook, 1405 N. 24th Street, Renton, requested response to her request continued at Council meeting of 2/22/88, that North 24th Street be widened to its Citizen Comment: Shook dedicated width by requiring removal of fences and rockeries which encroach N. 24th Street into right-of-way. She felt that a telephone call from staff member on Encroachments 3/17/88 denying request was unacceptable response, and referenced City pamphlet mailed with water bill in 1987 which stated that fences and hedges cannot be constructed on City right-of-way. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE FOR REPORT. CARRIED. Recalling that Mrs. Shook was out of town when meeting was held with residents on North 24th Street, Public Works Director Houghton advised that concerns of the neighbors are still under review by staff. He noted that Mrs. Shook was required by the City to widen the right-of-way when she developed her parcel. Mrs. Shook clarified that she had widened the street on her own, not in response to City requirement. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Streets: Carr Road Building and Zoning Department requested retention of designation ofCarrDesignation (Covenant Road in recently approved Covenant Church Annexation as exception to1969ChurchAnnexation) Street Grid Ordinance requiring east-west streets to reflect numerical designation; exception requested to avoid confusion caused by numerous grid changes in the area. Refer to Transportation Committee. Annexation: Honey City Attorney requested ordinance authorizing condemnation of NE23rdCreek. NE 23rd Street Street from the Honey Creek PPUD one block to the west. Refer toWaysCondemnationandMeansCommittee. Police: Jail Contract with Police Department requested approval of jail contract with City ofYarrowYarrowPointPoint. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Annexation: North Soos Policy Development Department requested referral of North SoosCreekCreek (Fairwood) public opinion survey and annexation proposal to facilitate Council monitoring. Refer to Community Services Committee. For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # O • p AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING APR-IL. V,, / rySUBMITTING March 29 , 1988 Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. LEGAL For Agenda Of Meeting Date) Staff Contact Lawrence J. Warren Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Ordinance authorizing the Consent condemnation N.E. 23rd Street from the Public Hearing Honey Creek PUD one block to the west. Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Ways and Means Committee for Ordinance . Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary.) PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. PQun oc-b4. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4143 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PPUD- 015-84 - HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES) WHEREAS a petition for the approval of a preliminary planned unit development for a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located in the City of Renton, has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department; and WHEREAS a preliminary planned unit development has been approved by the City Council following an appeal from the rec)mmendation for approval from the Hearing Examiner after public hearing thereon as provided by law, and WHEREAS it was necessary to annex this property to the City of Renton before approving this planned unit development, and saii annexation having been accomplished, and WHEREAS the applicant for this preliminary planned unit development has voluntarily agreed to the time limits for subnittal of the final plan for the planned unit development pursuant to City Code Section 4-2711.6.A of the City Code predicated on the fact that the time taken by the City to condemn a portion of N.E. 23rd Street will not apply to this time limit. Upon acquisition by the City of that parcel the two year "clock" will resume and the two year time limit will be cumulative, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4143 SECTION I: The preliminary planned unit development pertaining to the following described property is approved: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein) Said property located in the vicinity of the 2200 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil' s Elbow) SECTION II: The land uses of the preliminary planned unit development are low density single family residential dwellings, R-1 and R-2 low to medium density multi-family residential dwellings, uses which will result in a maximum of 72 units witzin this planned unit development. SECTION III: The effective date of the preliminary planned unit development approval is the effective date of this Ordinance, being thirty days after publication. The date of expiration of the appeal shall be pursuant to Section 4-2711.6.A which will be two years from the date of approval , subject to a one year extension if requested from and approved by the Hearing Examiner . SECTION IV: The time taken by the City to condemn a portion of N.E. 23rd Street will not apply to the time limit. Upon acquisition of that parcel the two year "clock" will resume and the two year time limit will be cumulative. SECTION V: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its pas,;age, approval and thirty days after publication. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4143 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 4th day of April, 1988. e ei Maxine E. Motor , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYO _this 4th day of April, 1988. V.. "---- Earl Clymer, ayor Approved as to form: L may Lawrence J. Warr n, City Attorney CITY"15: 2/26/88 Dates of Publication: April 8, 1988 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4143 HONEY 1REEK PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0'47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83'0G'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Pence continuing North 83'06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Pence North 43'06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Pence North 0'53'33" East a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South'88'15 ' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 34'58' 05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence South 1 '06'22" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Pcint of Beginning. TOC( THEN WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.N. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet to the Truc Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 0'53 '30" East a distance of 538.25 feet; Thence South 46'06'22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 11'06 ' 22" East a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 08'15' 15" 'lest a distance of 110.00 feet; Thence South 0'53'38" .st a distance of 437. 58 feet; Thence South 48'06'22" East a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence South 03'06 '22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet ; Thence North 03'19'25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet ; Thence North 83'19' 25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point or beginning. a- i t. ;ITS le set OH CP4e41/.17` 171 , • I:). i--i IL l•-•MAI% i. t>. I- pp0ID ORDINANCE NO. 4143 1 P4p0. 1 Lti-- S i f atY 54111 R R. FACIFIC COAST' ss1 I aee I 1 ' 1 i sa •p 1 1 I 1iiiIT0X. I CITY LIMIT . I" I 1 v aiT. 1 l st 1 40, 4 is Iii%, iEglis I t • v• i • ffn:v.T .,di n t1esz OMEN v .T. 1 _ T 0 R. IMO le ItsItseIr k ti- 1 - • - 121 -CLOISL_INIMMCIMIN:Fi• iiiiii:::. 111 SA. oilirkl 'c/ AN 9 ia am igill I str.w8 4. Milli i Op altg tilirA4 • arm -12polo. . an_ D I iv la l'i* i::*i:i:i:i:i:.::::::::::::: 01111 Well 411111i/jA ts• uts h._ i .rroll IV °:. ursA, I rr tou7EMIf lit toe nig „• C' Sly SIMImatimam1to . . u ,.....,. . . vow akin till IN I oyes I I Alms I nib I• , , 4::•,,,14- 1:17 t 4 ~t' t Rom.1.4.,ni u .Q q e0O u sT Q., LE I r 11 00 . N401. s •• ,. i 4 t c 3IO or4F e • t. 4.• - - I v 1 IT- NORTHvvsNIGNlpOI 1SPcfii- c' ,. ,' O e tr t I 1 II IIII 0 1 I A e 216 j, M i: r N g ,• • 1 .1 1., II 1 • o © A'© ersifLn611, En M1. ri. LrlimM I1 ate• 111 elIGN . • aka 4 . .. t: F`N h 31 . April 4. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 107 Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Development Committee regarding the Ray Brown request for deferral of improvements for short plat, Policy: Bonds and File No. Sh. P1. 002-86. The Planning and Development Committee met Deferrals (Ray Brown, twice on this topic. City ordinance permits deferral of certain on and off- Sh. P1. 002-86) site improvements for single family short plats. The subject short plat is multifamily (R-2), located on Monroe Avenue NE. However, because of topography and distance to certain utilities, circumstances are unique and the Committee found that it would constitute a hardship for the owner to install the improvements 400 feet beyond the subject property to connect to the storm sewer or to bond for those improvements at this time. There are no current development plans for this property. The Committee recommended that because of the unique circumstances, the subject short plat be permitted a deferral of improvements as outlined in City Code Section 9-1108.21.H for R-1 property. In all other aspects, the property shall comply to the underlying R-2 zoning. Because of the unique circumstances, this decision should not be considered precedential for any other multifamily parcels. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 87-049, Sunset Referencing request on 3/21/88 for status report on NE Sunset Boulevard Boulevard NE Phase II project, Councilman Stredicke indicated receipt of progress report from Public Works Director Houghton stating that street lighting and fencing atop rockery will be completed by this date, with fine grading and pouring of curbs and gutters projected for next week. The project is now 48% complete. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4143 An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development in PUD: Preliminary, Honey the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and generally south and Creek, PPUD-015-84 southeast of Devil's Elbow for Honey Creek Associates, PPUD-015-84. It was clarified that the southwest corner of the annexed property is zoned R-1 and R-2. Density for the PPUD is based on that corner and those two areas of designation, and does not include greenbelt or R-1 designation to the east or north. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4144 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Annexation: Honey to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE) to G-1, General, Creek, Phase II, and classification; Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Rezone SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL. ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4145 An ordinance was read ordering the construction and installation of roadways LID: 334, NE 44th Street of three, four and five lane configurations, to consist of curbs, gutters, and Lake Washington sidewalks, storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water mains, paving, streetBoulevardlighting, signalization, channelization, undergrounding of power, telephone and cable TV, downstream drainage, cleaning of retention ponds, ditching, excavation, and construction of embankments and other necessary improvements and appurtenances in the vicinity in and near NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard with Resolution No. 2704 of the City Council of the City of Renton, establishing Local Improvement District No. 334, and the approximate cost thereof; providing assessments upon property in said district; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement warrants, bonds or notes or other financing means as provided by law and establishing a special fund (LID #334). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, HUGHES, NELSON, MATHEWS, TRIMM, STREDICKE. 1 NAY: REED. CARRIED. Ordinance #4146 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of propertylocatedRezone: Dalpay, at 715 Sunset Boulevard NE from single family residential district (R-1) to R-072-87 medium density multifamily district (R-3) for James Dalpay, R-072-87. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 4, 1988 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Honey Creek Associates PPUD D-015-84 - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance Honey Creek Phase II Rezone - 8.73 acres located to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE) Ordinance Ordering Construction of LID #334 Dalpay Rezone (R-072-87) R-1 to R-3 - located at 715 Sunset Blvd. The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading and further requests suspension of the rules advancing it to second and final reading: Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Summary Ordinance The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Ordinance Amending Ordinance #4014 Authorization to Proceed with Friendly Condemnation on the Bitney Property The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Adopting Well Field Monitoring Study as a Factual Document 4 Za- Richard Stredicke, Chair Robert Hugh Nancy Mathews s March 28, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 96 Latecomer Agreement: Public Works Department requested draft ordinance establishing latecomer Procedure agreement procedure. Refer to Utilities Committee. CAG: 86-016, Grady Way Public Works Department submitted CAG-016-86, SW Grady Way Street Project Improvements; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $21,515.12, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $44,885.83 to contractor, Gary Merlino Construction Co., if all required releases are received. Council concur. Streets: Funding for Public Works Department requested budget funding for removal of debris Removal of Debris from City streets and City-owned property to defray increased fees at transfer station. Refer to Utilities Committee. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee recommended acceptance of low bid from Omega CAG: 88-012, Mt. Olivet Contractors in the amount of $110,214.44 for Mt. Olivet and Highlands Pump Pump Station and Station Rehabilitation; and requested authorization for Mayor and City Clerk Highlands Pump Station to execute contract. Council concur. Rehabilitation Transportation Transportation Committee recommended acceptance of low bid from R. W. Committee Scott Construction Co. in the amount of $788,458.84 for SW Sunset Boulevard CAG: 87-074, SW Sunset Roadway Improvements (Rainier Avenue S. to west City limits); and Boulevard Roadway, requested authorization for Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract. Intersection and Council concur. Watermain Improvements MOVED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: PUD: Preliminary, Honey An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development in Creek, PPUD-015-84 the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow for Honey Creek Associates, PPUD-015-84. Seeking further information on the area of the PPUD, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Fire: Underground Tank An ordinance was read amending Title VII (Fire Regulations) of City Code Secondary Containment by adding Chapter 12 establishing the Underground Storage Tank Secondary Ordinance Containment Ordinance. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Annexation: Honey An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Creek, Phase II, and to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE) to G-1, General, Rezone classification; Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. LID: 334, NE 44th Street An ordinance was read ordering the construction and installation of roadways and Lake Washington of three, four and five lane configurations, to consist of curbs, gutters, Boulevard sidewalks, storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water mains, paving, street lighting, signalization, channelization, undergrounding of power, telephone and cable TV, downstream drainage, cleaning of retention ponds, ditching, excavation, and construction of embankments and other necessary improvements and appurtenances in the vicinity in and near NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard with Resolution No. 2704 of the City Council of the City of Renton, establishing Local Improvement District No. 334, and the approximate cost thereof; providing assessments upon property in said district; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement warrants, bonds or notes or other financing means as provided by law and establishing a special fund (LID #334). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. r WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 28, 1988 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Honey Creek Associates PPUD (PPUD-015-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance Honey Creek Phase II Rezone - 8. 73 acres located to the northwest of Devil ' s Elbow Road ( 120th Place SE) Ordinance Ordering Construction of LID #334 Dalpay Rezone (R-072-87) R-1 to R-3 - located at 715 Sunset Blvd. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS Having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered, the Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 39380 through No. 39718 in the amount of $935, 779.22; Vouchers 39383, 39386 - 39393 machine voided. tax Richard Stred Chairman dfir Rob:JP— Hughes 41 i l e2/2-4- Nancy Ma sews r Department of Assessments ATTENTION: Abstract Lion - Al Martin F 709F King County Admi__. Lration Building O R Seattle, Washington 98104 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 4j Q PUBLIC RECORDS DIVISION CO z n The attached material comes to you in 09, 0 o response to your recent request. O, 9grED SEP1.- Ordinance No. 4141 March 25, 1988 CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 PHONE (206) 235-2500 Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk 4* AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Audrey Benner being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Renton Edition K , Auburn Edition and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Ordinance No . 4141 was published on March 25 , 1 Y 1 8 R2 8 T 7 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ . 3 3 •o u Subscribed and sworn to before ethis 3 0 t hday of Marc a 1988 Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11 86 iS CITY OFRENTONE7 VASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.4141 Ordinance of the City of Renton, ington changing the zoning classifica- Public Notice Public Notice Public Notice ot certain properties within the City of Marilyn J. Petersen follows: tance of 345.00 feet; n from General Classification District Deputy City Clerk Commencing at the aforementioned Thence South 88°15'15" East a dis- 1)to Residence Districts(R-1) and(R-2) Approved by the Mayor this 21st day of Southwest Corner; tance of 185.29 feet to an intersection with end General Classification District (G-1) March, 1988. Thence South 88°19'23" East a dis- the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the Honey Creek Associates R-014-84) Earl Clymer tance of 1288.90 feet along the South line East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section Whereas under Chapter 7, Title IV Mayor of said Southeast 1/ 4;4; Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. Approved as to form: Thence North 1°15'59" East a distance Thence North along said East line of the 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordi- Lawrence J.Warren of 114.74 feet to the True Point of Begin- West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the nances of the City of Renton," as amend- City Attorney ping;Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the South 3d, and the maps and reports adopted in Exhibit"A" Thence North 88°19'25" West a dis- Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street conjunction therewith, the property herein- Honey Creek Rezone tance of 280.00 feet; 120th Place S.E. and also known as Dev- oelow described has heretofore been Phase I Parcel A R-2 Zoning Thence North 9°08'56" West a distance il's Elbow); zoned as General Classification District That portion of Section 4, Township 23 of 514.84 feet; Thence Southeasterly along said Right- G-1);and North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Thence North 57°15'59" East a dis- of-Way Line to a point of curve, saidcurveWhereasaproperpetitionforchangeofWashington, more particularly described as tance of 450.00 feet; being concave to the Northwest with a radi- zone classification of said property has follows:Thence South 1°15'59"West a distance us of 80.00 feet, and a center which bears peen filed with the Building and Zoning Commencing at the Southwest corner of of 760.00 feet to the True Point of Begin- North 38°15'25" East; Department on or about January 24, 1984, the Southeast 1/ 4 of the Northwest 1/ 4 of ning. Thence Easterly and NortherlyalongwhichpetitionwasdulyreferredtothesaidSection4; Together with said curve an arc distance of 213.84 feet; searing Examiner for investigation, study Thence South 88°19'25" East a dis- That portion of Section 4, Township 23 Thence Northwesterly along theEasterlyandpublichearing, and public hearings tance of 839.97 feet; North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Right-of-Way Line of said 120th Place laving been held thereon on or about Feb- Thence North 0°47'11" West a distance Washington, more particularly described as Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a uary 19, 1985, December 31, 1985 and of 203.69 feet; follows: point of curve, said curve being concavetoNay12, 1986,and said matter having been Thence North 83°06'22" West a dis- Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet July considered by the Hearing Examiner tance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of and a center which bears North 65°06'50" and said zoning request having been grant- Beginning; said Section 4; East; ad with conditions and the matter having Thence continuing North 83°06'22" Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance Thence Northerly along said curveandseenappealedtotheCityCouncilandtheWestadistanceof400.00 feet; of 630.00 feet to the True Point of Begin- said Easterly Right-of-Way Line an arc dis- ity Council having modified the Hearing Thence North 48°06'22" West a dis- ping;tance of 72.3 feet to the point ofreverseExaminer's decision and said zoning tance of 228.60 feet; Thence continuing North 0°53'38" East curve, said curve being concave totheequestbeinginconformitywiththeCity's Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance a distance of 538.25 feet; Southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; omprehensive Plan, as artlended,and the of 437.58 feet; Thence South 46°06'22" East a dis- Thence Northwesterly along saidcurvestyCouncilhavingdulyconsideredallThenceSouth88°15'15" East a dis- tance of 345.00 feet; and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to a natters relevant thereto, and all parties tance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 11°06'22" East a dis- point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 laving been heard appearing in support Thence South 34°58'05" East a dis- tance of 105.00 feet; feet; hereof or in opposition thereto, now there- tance of 481.65 feet; Thence North 88°15'15" West a dis- Thence North 49°23'20" WestalongoreThenceSouth1°06'22" East a distance tance of 110.00 feet; said Easterly Right-of-Way Line adistanceTheCityCounciloftheCityofRenton, of 235.00 feet to the True Point of Begin- Thence South 0°53'38"West a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, saidcurveVashington,do ordain as follows: ning.of 437.58 feet; being concave to the Northeast with a radi- Section I: The following described prop- Exhibit"B" Thence South 48°06'22" East a dis- us of 60.0 feet and a center which bears rty in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned Honey Creek Rezone tance of 228.60 feet; North 40°36'40" East; s hereinbelow specified; the Building and Phase I Parcel C R-1 Zoning Thence South 83°06'22" East a dis- Thence Northerly along said curve and oning Director is hereby authorized and That portion of Section 4, Township 23 tance of 500.00 feet; said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to an inter- irected to change the maps of the Zoning North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Thence South 0°47'11" East a distance section with the West Line of the East Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said Washington, more particularly described as of 203.69 feet; 1111.28 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the zoning,to-wit: follows:Thence North 88°19'25" West a dis- Northwest y of said Section 4; R-2: Commencing in the Southwest corner of tance of 779.99 feet; Thence Northerly along said West linetoSeeExhibit "A" attached hereto and the Southeast 1/ 4 of the Northwest 1/ 4 of Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance the Southwest corner of the Plat of Para- aade a part hereof as if fully set forth said Section 4; of 630.00 feet; dise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of erein.Thence South 88°19'25" East a dis- Thence North 88°19'25" West a dis- Plats, Page 93, records of King County,R-1: tance of 1288.90 feet along the South line tance of 59.98 feet to the True Point of Washington; See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and of said Southeast 1/ 4;Beginning. Thence South 88°15'36" East a dis- rade a part hereof as if fully set forth Thence North 1°15'59" East a distance Exhibit"C" tance of 55.60 feet; erein. of 1034.74 feet to the True Point of Begin- Honey Creek Rezone Thence South 1°16'00"West a distance G-1: ning; Phase I Parcel B G-1 Zoning of 205.00 feet; See Exhibit "C" attached hereto and Thence South 57°15'59" West a dis- That portion of Section 4, Township 23 Thence South 24°14'00" East a dis- lade a part hereof as if fully set forth tance of 320.00 feet; North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, tance of 700.00 feet; erein.Thence South 81°42'58" West a dis- Washington, more particularly described as Thence South 32°14'00" East a dis- Said property being located in the vicini- tance of 311.13 feet; follows: tance of 330.00 feet; of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue Thence North 32°14'00" West a dis- Commencing at the Southwest corner of Thence North 81°42'58" East a dis- E.) tance of 330.00 feet; the Southeast 1/ 4 of the Northwest 1/ 4 of tance of 311.13 feet; And subject further to that certain Decla- Thence North 24°14'00" West a dis- said Section 4; Thence North 57°15'59" East a dis- ition of Restrictive Covenants executed by tance of 700.00 feet; Thence South 88°19'25" East a dis- tance of 320.00 feet; etitioner-Owners on or about March 17, Thence North 1°16'00" East a distance tance of 839.97 feet to the True Point of Thence South 1°15'59"West a distance 88, and recorded in the office of the of 205.00 feet; Beginning; of 160.00 feet; erector of Records and Elections, Receiv- Thence South 88°15'36" East a dis- Thence North 0°47'11" West a distance Thence South 57°15'59" West a dis- g No. 8803170270 and which said Cove- tance of 500.00 feet; of 203.69 feet; tance of 450.00 feet; ants are hereby incorporated and made a Thence South 1°15'59"West a distance Thence North 83°06'22" West a dis- Thence South 9°08'56" East a distance art hereof as if fully set forth(on file in the of 392.70 feet; tance of 100.00 feet; of 514.84 feet; ity Clerk's Office) Thence South 88°15'36" East a dis- Thence North 1°06'22" West a distance Thence South 88°19'25" East a dis- And further subject to the ten conditions tance of 555.64 feet; of 235.00 feet; tance of 280.00 feet iposed by the City Council at its meeting Thence South 1°15'59"West a distance Thence North 34°58'05" West a dis- Thence South 1°15'59"West a distance i April 14, 1986. of 480.00 feet to the True Point of Begin- tance of 481.65 feet; of 114.74 feet; Section II:This Ordinance shall be effec- ning. Thence North 88°15'15" West a dis- Thence North 88°19'25" West a dis- re upon its passage, approval and five Together with: tance of 170.00 feet; tance of 448.93 feet to the True Point of ays after its publication. That portion of Section 4, Township 23 Thence North 11°06'22" West a dis- Beginning. Passed by the City Council this 21st day North, Range 5 East W.M. King County, tance of 105.00 feet; Published in the Valley DailyNewsMarch, 1988. Washington, more particularly described as Thence North 46°06'22" West a dis- March 25, 1988. R2877. CITY OF RENTON NIL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk March 24 , 1988 Honey Creek Associates Attn: Mr . Tomberg & Mr . Santa 5611 119th S. E . , Suite #2 Bellevue, Washington 98006 RE : Honey Creek Associates/R-014-84 Ordinance No . 4141 Dear Mr . Tomberg and Mr . Santa : The referenced rezone was finalized by the Renton City Council on March 21 , 1988 , by adoption of Ordinance No . 4141 . A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your files . If we can be of further assistance in this matter , please feel free to call . Sincerely , d-) ' Marilyn J . etersen Deputy City Clerk Enclosure cc : Mr . John L . Hendrickson, Shidler McBroom Gates & Lucas Mr . Mel Easter , Johnson Braund Design Group Building & Zoning Department Hearing Examiner Policy Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 4$ © CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: March 22, 1988 TO: Nancy Mathews, Councilwoman FROM: Carrie Trimnell, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone King County Park Holdings At the direction of Larry Springer, I have identified the area encompassed by King County's proposed May Creek Park, the properties which are currently owned by the King County Parks Department, and the existing Renton and King County zoning designations applicable to these properties (please refer to the attached map). King County has numerous land holdings in the vicinity of the Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone. In King County, these properties are zoned SE - Suburban Estate, which requires a minimum lot size of 35,000 square feet. The purpose of this zone is to provide areas for single-family dwellings and related uses at rural densities. The County owns properties in the City of Renton which are zoned primarily G-1 General Use. This zone is equivalent to the County's SE zone in both the minimum lot size and the permitted uses. The County also owns properties in Renton zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential. In addition, they intend to acquire a parcel currently zoned R-4 High Density Multi-Family. This property is involved in a City-initiated rezone from R-4 to staff's recommended G-1. King County does not have a Public Use zone similar to Renton's P-1 Public Use zone. In summary, the imposition of G-1 zoning on the Phase II parcel of the Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone is in keeping with both the City and the County's zoning of the properties held by the County for the proposed May Creek Park. I hope this information will be of assistance to you. If you have any questions, or if I can be of additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at x2552. crn e1wnN. I NAR t 2 IS I l l t.tr • .'HO ! 1 1 ct:dsk3a:hc6 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 Ill :" I , 141 , I ' .. i s - 1f---------7;cer:— „ 1 17.—..41 • 1 Htt4. — lo r _ IL ---- rrIII I• teI, t 7" • ,\ 3.•...‘.1.I.. I ...• , \ - 40, ./.er(..,. _ 1744°,6i.) IIW.` srr_____,..-- , i0.>/ iti._I'r1. :III, P.1l'l'!._ a1. 7, rlg.) 337if..7ie.:i' .......711L ,... L' SIN1. I .:i1 ..?f'7... PII- i IT:rT6I 1 3.9 .. ! . r ....:".,/;....,. f.:..% ...t.5::::::.•.'...-. i''. .. li.:::::::::::.;;:..:::.;:::::•••:...::::::::::::::1::::::::::::::::::::::::!:: Cw• 4 t f.:'J:: :1':':'::: ••.'.'::.'.' LL± t9z1 Ale:/•• .• / l••••••••••••••••••••••••;:.• . ...../**....... i.........•::.?::::::::.:::::::.:,:Z.:::.:*:,..-:::.**:::.:;.;................: 113fie, e:j://" Afsfi);i49.•;4kk ?444/.50'47464. •.:.• 4.ostelogo*TR-41°153e.e..stssi.i.- "'le/ fdroed1/07,:cir / 4,-:%:-....::::::.:. 7,6- -NU 10PA 79 i .94., S/. 1 I.i. I1 . o IL7T1L'LLizlr , 2 • l tlLTG LIII + i. I \ i LI!279 IW/t KEHHKt.;,itl. ... -1I \ / L.,. r=1 az!• DALEL9Gzii, `- ,z_11,_._Jm2 !!S7Fs:fffi•• 1- - • ...... L'1-"-t: 1=7 a LIONS laJ. _ ' r Iii I.I.i;..` .i•1 { .lA,!„.... 1y irraJr-. I 0 »•rrr•.. r—: i. I,..•,!!!_.•. ......__.1,..... :, _,-. 11`ykl• • 41,. e _/• Leai2'.3I26z —321. 1 ° - 1,,,uotrro.•-i .I ; I : 1.• . , 1 I I i1-.... 1;.... ii' F...h01nr';f.'•'fIe ' iH9 _ 2. a' ,! f" `, l a• 2I 21226 1 L`.2 I2aj1`II~<a22!} •_=r1i.. . 1' if, 1 cr1,;'S w la. 1' ,' serIz.• Ii. tit' ioui 1 e 1 t1'I•••;,• . )/. 1t1CRESTQp t. — L7ltz/fmiPasI • rMT r :u•' c ` JNOR' , Ko„.....,T. cize„F....14‘ F>Al2.\14Th y t . I`i. pCI= --•1' 1T Vim,:._; I`y; s. 1. f1i--LI1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4141 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT G-1) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (R-1) AND (R-2) AND GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G-1)HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES R-014-84) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of this City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about January 24, 1984, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and public hearings having been held thereon on or about February 19, 1985, December 31, 1985 and May 12 , 1986, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request having been granted with corditions and the matter having been appealed to the City Council and the City Council having modified the Hearing Examiner's decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN ORDINANCE NO. 4141 AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned as hereinbelow specified; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: R-2 : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. R-1: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein) G-1 See Exhibit "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein) Said property being located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about March 17, 1988, and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No. 8803170270 and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. AND FURTHER SUBJECT to the ten conditions imposed by the City Coincil at its meeting on April 14, 1986. SECTION II:This Ordinance shall be effective upon its pa;sage, approval and five days after its publication. 2- ORDINANCE NO. 4141 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of March, 1988. arily tersen, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 21st day of March, 1988 . Pa Earl Clymer, M or Approved as to form: Liwr4tAAfte44- aveal/tAon."-- a J. WarrCity Attorney Date of Publication: March 25, 1988 O:2D14/2/26/88 3- K l ecord of CcJ{ C1er-k_ R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 Ci-1yo-P ORDINANCE NO. 4141 co c, ledk m•4-e1N, WA 98OS w RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS COMES NOW MICR C. SANTA and BOB TOMERG of Honey Creek associates- and do hereby impose the following Restrictive Covenants: There shall be no development, site plan or planned unit development approval upon the property without the City being provided with geotechnical studies regarding the site and fire and police services are provided . on the property legally described as follows: B" & ,,C,, See Exhibit "A"/attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. This Covenant is a covenant running with the land and is binding upon all successors in interest to the subject property. Dated : March /6; 44; 1988. 7 ick . Santa Bob To rg STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF RING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mick C. Santa and Bob Tomberg signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated : March/6 , 1988 . Notary PuOl for the State of Washington My appointment expires: AO-Sr-ff. CITY5 : 06/2/26/88 EXHIBIT "A" ORDINANCE NO. 4141 H ( CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL R-2 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0'47'11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83'06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 83'06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence North 48'06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 88'15' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 34'58'05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence South 1'06'22" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 1F.H.3.12.AJH:mf 11/13/87 EXHIBIT "B" ORDINANCE NO. 4141 HONEY CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL C R-1 zoning That portion Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King ounty, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15'59" East a distance of 1034.74 feet to the True Point f Beginning; Thence South 57'15'59" West a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 81'42'58" West a distance of 311.13 feet; Thence North 32'14'00" West a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 24'14' 00" West a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence North 1'16 '00" East a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 88'15'36" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 392.70 feet; Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 555.64 feet; Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 480.00 feet to the True Point If Beginning. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. King I;ounty, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned Southwest Corner; Thence South 88'19' 23" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South ine of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance of 114.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence North 9'O8'56" West a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence North 57'15 '59" East a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 760.00 feet; to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4141 Exhibit "B" (Continued) TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 0'53'38" East a distance of 538.25 feet; Thence South 46'06'22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 11'06' 22" East a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 88'15' 15" West a distance of 110.00 feet; Thence South 0'53'38" West a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 48'06'22" East a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence South 83'06'22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet; Thence North 88'19' 25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Page 2 of 2 1F.H.3.11.AJH:mf 12/11/87 r EXHIBIT "C" ORDINANCE NO. 4141 HONEY CREEK RE E phase I PARCEL B G-1 zor That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence North 1°06'22" West a distance of 235.00 feet; Thence North 34°58'05" West a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence North 88°15 ' 15" West a distance of 170.00 feet; Thence North 11°06'22" West a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 46°06'22" West a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 185.29 feet to an intersection witi the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North along said East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the South Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. and also known as Devils Elbow) ; Thence Southeasterly along said Right-of-Way Line to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northwest with a radius of 80.00 feet, and a cen :er which bears North 38°15'25" East; Thence Easterly and Northerly along said curve an arc distance of 213.84 fee:; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of said 120th Plai:e Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet and a center which bears North 65°06'50" East; 4 Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line an arc distance of 72.3 feet to the point of reverse curve, said curve being concave to the Southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; Thence Northwesterly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to a point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 feet; Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4141 Exhibit "C" (Continued) Thence North 49°23'20" West along said Easterly Right—of—Way Line a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 60.0 feet and a center which bears North 40°36'40" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right—of—Way Line to an intersection with the West Line of the East 1111.28 feet of the Northeast 1/t of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence Northerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the Plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats, Page 93, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 88°15'36" East a distance of 55.60 feet; Thence South 1 °16'00" West a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 24°14'00" East a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence South 32°14'00" East a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 81 °42'58" East a distance of 311.13 feet; Thence North 57°15'59" East a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 1°15'59" West a distance of 160.00 feet; Thence South 57°15'59" West a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 9°08'56" East a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15'59" West a distance of 114.74 feet; Thence North 88°19'25" West a distance of 448.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1F.3.21 .AJH:mf 01/18/88 Page 2 of 2 1111111131. I a c0.!1•T I• a . > D la an.......Awe. - o cs 0 19)mi44k.. ., .. \,\ sii 1 oga s . . #. 16 Ei441L.4111 4*ar i ' i 1 11MVd F s 0 n, ky&1 11191H a ` aUMI 313 t Q• 4. :, 0 1S321D11 OO til .a ^ i .. 402 n lc a. aO a • ` RO f w S 1is 1 = a MI Illi\lil WM INik Isiajlit =Sipa iii- 0, • rh,Q..,,) L Ix; vslifi9dits Wu a,.:,..,,,,,..: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. . . - 0. 111 1 mil. lima Ems 4 IIINr, WiiiI"'•'L `1J'rtcfho0'. Moe i : isa Viet eau" 111111t,„, 4,-,?. i,§;:::,e- .....*:::::::::::•.::::::::: Mit IIIIMMIIIIII I worrekOSf:, ' rig pow v• •::•:::::::::::.:::::::::. ' 111112111111111111311g11111011 j.,.... a° 17.- if,I 101 ma/___...* ...1.21,111 OW .O.V..,,s4,...V1,.Q.$l...ll.,',..,U,," P•-- 7, tigglIMNIEMSCHECUM13 liINC‘ Ier•Jrx5 illLs.is l / j1 r l'S' • C? ca' ,. .:•;': 1 1 wee fi. k• , 1E- t aa . ,. I •.. 4.. c. r' • LS in ii 1 Gag c i.. ccz •• I • i tz iceill. ill. wa C miLIs w. s..., a • 11 ..rn } t2lit;wsjp . A • k . /,_ , Isil''v 111119111k : 11Wt"1 117 n••1N32! cat, 0712 17 L6t 1 1as 61.0 oaa 1 ore 1 1 LIPS ma ti i r I. I 1 Y-: ' CM 1 1 Mt SCa`d0o 7I4I i,• Co t Mt - I#747.1ntiel T'T' •ON QONKNIQHO ilAN 71 . _. N.rsiLAI11 _. I. LA, i/ .-'j1 44 72C Qti I - '' *if - i March 21. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes 1- Pane 90 PUD: Preliminary, Honey An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development in Creek, PPUD-015-84 the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow for Honey Creek Associates, PPUD-015-84. To allow for clarification of specific boundary of area used to determine development density for the proposed project, it was MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ordinance #4142 An ordinance was read annexing 24.09 acres located on SE Carr Road Annexation: Covenant between Talbot Road South and 104th Avenue SE to the City of Renton for Church Covenant Church (A-005-86). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THIS ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Resolution #2711 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Public Works: 1988 Cedar documents relating to request for Washington State Department of Ecology River Channel Dredging Flood Control Assistance Account Program for 1988 Cedar River Channel and Bank Repairs,Dredging and Bank Repairs, and Maplewood Creek Restoration. MOVED BY Maplewood Creek, DOE STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADOPT THE Funds RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2712 A resolution was read declaring an emergency regarding drilling production Utility: Maplewood Golf water wells at Maple Valley Golf Course. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Course Emergency Well SECONDED HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. Drilling CARRIED. Resolution #2713 A resolution was read setting public hearing on 4/18/88 to consider petition Vacation: VAC-88-001,submitted by Fernwood North Homeowners' Association for vacation of a Bremerton Place NE, portion of Bremerton Place NE, located east of Union Avenue SE (SE 132nd Fernwood North Street) and south of NE 4th Street. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED Homeowners' Association BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2714 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor to enter into an interlocal Police: Jail Contract cooperative agreement for jail services with the cities of Hunts Point and with Hunts Point and Normandy Park, Washington. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY Normandy Park HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilwoman Keolker Wheeler requested that Council consider the addition Council Agenda to the Consent Agenda items such as committee reports and bid openings that are non-critical, non-controversial, and will not have public opinion or comment. King County: Council President Keolker Wheeler presented letter addressed to Mayor Commuter Rail Clymer from Auburn Mayor Roegner, requesting allocation of funds from System Renton for participation by suburban cities in commuter rail study in the amount of $50,000. MOVED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, LETTER FROM MAYOR ROEGNER REGARDING ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR COMMUTER RAIL STUDY BE REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) COMMITTEE AND ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. Councilman Hughes requested information regarding amount of contribution from King County, City of Seattle, and Metro towards the study. CAG: 87-049, Sunset Councilman Stredicke requested report on the progress of the NE Sunset Boulevard NE Phase II Boulevard project. Mayor Clymer advised that a written report will be provided. AUDIENCE COMMENT Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue NE, Renton, requested that Citizen Comment; Walker consideration be given to pedestrians when planning the street lights for the CBD Street Lighting, central business district. Secondly, after attending two hearings on the Commuter Rail Commuter Rail Project, she felt Renton would be receiving all the traffic enroute to the train station, and preferred buses for commuter service for Renton. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 21 , 1988 ORDIN \NCES The Wiys and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Honey Creek Associates Rezone (R-014-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Honey Creek Associates PPUD (PPUD-015-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow) Covenant Church Annexation (A-005-86) - located at S.E. Carr Road between Talbot Road S. and 104th Avenue S.E. The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Resolution for 1988 Cedar River Channel and Maplewood Creek Repairs with DOE Resolution Declaring an Emergency re Drilling Production Water Wells at Maple Valley Golf Course Resolution setting public hearing of 4/18/88 for Bremerton Place NE, Fernwood North Homeowners' Association, Street Vacation (VAC-88-001) - east of Union Avenue SE (SE 132nd Street) and south of NE 4th Street Resolution Authorizing Jail Contracts with Cities of Hunts Point and Normandy Park Richard Stredicke, Chairman 2 7I4Ro1Hugh Nancy Mathews March 21. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 89 10. Applicant can construct an earthen berm on that portion of the site which is contiguous with the eastern edge of the Cedar River Park. This berm shall extend, as necessary, onto the west side of the Stoneway property. Said berm shall be six feet in height above the proposed grade along the property boundary as shown on the grading plan. The location of the berm and the fence shall be subject to agreement between applicant and the Park Department. 11. If covenants are necessary to ensure historical use only, those will be proposed before site plan approval. For purposes of these conditions, Shoreline District shall mean that 200-foot strip parallel to the right bank of the Cedar River along applicant's site. The Committee recommended that the Council reverse the Hearing Examiner and approve the fill and grade permit with the above conditions. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Responding to Council concern regarding proper use of riverfront property, Councilwoman Mathews advised intent of the report that Stoneway would be allowed to fill if they received State and Shoreline Management approval, but would not be able to use any of the filled property until the City issues site plan approval. She noted that there are historic uses to the property which Stoneway has the right to continue, and those uses will be determined during site plan review. Stoneway cannot expand the industrial use that has been there over past years, but they can improve the shoreline if all approvals are obtained. •MOTION CARRIED. In response to Council inquiry, David Halinen, attorney for Stoneway, 3015 112th Avenue NE, Suite 203, Bellevue, advised that he has received material regarding the Council's mission statement requesting Stoneway to join the City in partnership to try and make further improvements along the riverbank whenever possible, but has not yet reviewed them with the applicant. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Committee the staff recommendation to approve the assignment of Fancher Flyways, Inc. Lease: Fancher to Leven, Municipal Hangar X-33-A (Office) and X-33-C (Hangar) to Bruce J. Leven. RLAG-01-81 Lease: Leven, LAG-001- Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in 88 the staff recommendation to approve the request from Mr. Bruce J. Leven to standardize ground lease termination dates to a common date of December 31, 2019. Airport: Hangar Rental Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Rates the staff recommendation to defer a decision about increasing municipal hangar rental rates until receipt of an "Appraisal of Airport Properties" report is forthcoming. Airport: Hangar Lease Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Procedure the staff recommendation that the City retain its current procedure for leasing space in the City-owned hangar. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE TRANSPORTATION AVIATION) COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4141 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Rezone: Honey Creek,in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE from General R-014-84 Classification District (G-1) to single family residential district (R-1) and low density multifamily residential district (R-2) and General Classification District (G-1) for Honey Creek Associates, R-014-84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 21 , 1988 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and f 'nal reading: Honey Creek Associates Rezone (R-014-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Honey Creek Associates PPUD (PPUD-015-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow) Covenant Church Annexation (A-005-86) - located at S.E. Carr Road between Talbot Road S. and 104th Avenue S.E. The Whys and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption : ' Resolution for 1988 Cedar River Channel and Maplewood Creek Repairs with DOE Resolution Declaring an Emergency re Drilling Production Water Wells at Maple Valley Golf Course Resolution setting public hearing of 4/18/88 for Bremerton Place NE, Fernwood North Homeowners' Association, Street Vacation (VAC-88-001) - east of Union Avenue SE (SE 132nd Street) and south of NE 4th Street Resolution Authorizing Jail Contracts with Cities of Hunts Point and Normandy Park Richard Stredicke, Chairman zze Ro i Hugh KO 141 Nancy Mathews CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM MAAEA, I (v , r>e7e , CITY OF REN*'nN NW TI MIS CITY CLEWS OFFICE ----. I Jr Er 0 Ire res.; 4-zrIcul CAKe-ek-- 04.44-ac FPLAD fit—tittn.trz, lextrt.e, Z — k 2 . 2- — vet- itev k Pa vc t' . Le- PocXG-C P V - t- vim te),c G PvcXwt IN V vim, -t- -e- clezt_ LIC-,--Are, VototAl . IU 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 e HOI CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL A t-2 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 83°06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence North 48°06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 88°15 ' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 34°58'05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence South 1 °06'22" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 1F.H.3. 12.AJH:mf 11/13/87 LX14‘syr 'c) HONEY CREEK RE;phase I PARCEL B G-1 zon That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence North 1 °06' 22" West a distance of 235.00 feet; Thence North 34°58' 05" West a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence North 88°15 ' 15" West a distance of 170.00 feet; Thence North 11 °06'22" West a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 46°06'22" West a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 185.29 feet to an intersection with the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North along said East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the South Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. and also known as Devils Elbow) ; Thence Southeasterly along said Right-of-Way Line to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northwest with a radius of 80.00 feet, and a center which bears North 38°15' 25" East; Thence Easterly and Northerly along said curve an arc distance of 213.84 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of said 120th Place Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet and a center which bears North 65°06'50" East; 4 Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line an arc distance of 72.3 feet to the point of reverse curve, said curve being concave to the Southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; Thence Northwesterly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to a point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 feet; Page 1 of 2 Thence North 49°23'20" West along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 60.0 feet and a center which bears North 40°36'40" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the West Line of the East 1111 .28 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence Northerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the Plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats, Page 93, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 88°15'36" East a distance of 55.60 feet; Thence South 1 °16'00" West a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 24°14'00" East a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence South 32°14'00" East a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 81 °42'58" East a distance of 311 . 13 feet; Thence North 57°15'59" East a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15' 59" West a distance of 160.00 feet; Thence South 57°15 '59" West a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 9°08' 55" East a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15'59" West a distance of 114.74 feet; Thence North 88°19' 25" West a distance of 448.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1F.3.21 .AJH:mf 01/18/88 Page 2 of 2 HONEY CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL C R-1 zoning That portion Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance of 1034.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 57'15' 59" West a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 81'42' 58" West a distance of 311. 13 feet; Thence North 32'14 ' 00" West a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 24'14 ' 00" West a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence North 1'16' 00" East a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 1'15 ' 59" West a distance of 392.70 feet; Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 555.64 feet; Thence South 1'15 ' 59" West a distance of 480.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned Southwest Corner; Thence South 88'19' 25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance of 114.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 88'19 ' 25" West a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence North 9'08' 56" West a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence North 57'15 ' 59" East a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 1'15 ' 59" West a distance of 760.00 feet; to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 2 TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 0'53' 38" East a distance of 538.25 feet; Thence South 46'06'22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 11'06 ' 22" East a distance of 1-05.00 feet; Thence North 88'15' 15" West a distance of 110.00 feet; Thence South 0'53'38" West a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 48'06'22" East a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence South 83'06'22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; Thence North 0'53' 38" East a distance of 630.00 feet ; Thence North 88'19' 25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Page 2 of 2 1F.H.3.11.AJH:mf 12/11/87 HONEYCREEK REZONE — Parcel D G-1 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 said point also being the True Point of Beginning; Thence South Ol °16' 12" East along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to an intersection with the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1490; Thence West along said South line to an intersection with the East line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 3401 a distance of 320.12 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing City of Renton limits a distance of 430 feet; Thence West and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1246 a distance of 320.81 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing limits of the City to an intersection with the South line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1622 a distance of 500 feet more or less; Thence East along said City limits a distance of 321 .6 feet more or less; Thence North and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence East along said North line to the Northeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 a distance of 322.20 feet and the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 1F.3. 17.AJH:mf 12/11/87 x . 1)74 • S;9 I 570 50Z 4 57 l I--- • L. iv1. y Imo,N. • •` (.... Pit114111"6446 R PACIFIC COAST oot I \/ 1 155 I Mg 1I I i 570 goo I 1 1 r s77 1 ss7 Y J Sj 2''A • w RENT 1 CS't`y' LIMIT 4' 5 1 14' It: lilliAwskv > A nu 1 4°` 4 It tE1ti11 MIIIIIIIIIMISI fto zo5 la - n. c- MitiI i iWti. tcs", LW rat i...% 1 nee C,. A. r lD..l•e.12l, T'S lTe.„4'„,.,v- itm.,.',i ELME L ii 9 G C9vm 1 Mee J r,0 0 6 4. ! e s, t / / oq looms t.T1 1 / / II I e see e . F , ass In i. T' \ l- 1'1 P S$ 1, f mo l,6'' G 1 11 1• ! i T gmr©mimer Paso f r «a G. am••. , C. 011 .O r 11 10 1. A.0 s, 1 k.: ez, lit* gr3I 1 "CO 1.11 . a m ales 1" MI- OVER' LL Y_ INIIIIIII., OLD ,• 0 v 1,-,, a • r F• ' r t ,., a NItoeD.LU. CREST09 l 1 CL L•° C.00L 1. S 1 tin S4 Y• J' C• ' ] yr. 7 0 rise,,,,,,,,.,.• y n y' . , , R' '`+bye A 4 ::?;rpS. 11 NNW' I CIN s'9 • a • ,. j •.:/ NORTH t I tal tid 1 1:, , v is,, N IG gi aaoc ' ru' ; i7M i 1,.'.. ; ra,.. 04, 41--a,,_mitijk . g as 1 . es r 94 411*6 % Ai ' N' t:iga gi 9 alio1E:11 1121111 1Elp m fr1.l` rJ. t ! 3 tf o' t 1 i .. mr , sswirl , ...5 me 3l7 W igaiif 1 RP rlI Gii /,- f e j '' 2(11 1' 0 • a.:,t. it Fl°d 9 LXHlbll A HONEY CREEK RE E phase I PARCEL A R-2 zor That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Eeginning; Thence continuing North 83°06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence North 48°06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 88°15 ' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 34°58' 05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence South 1 °06122" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Pcint of Eeginning. tjlAjlv efV7 ll1 OA ' 4"' eiL/Vt,(-)L/ Page 1 of 1 1F.H.3. 12.AJH:mf 11/13/87 L EXHIBIT B HONEY CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL B G-1 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range45 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet to the True Point _ of Beginning; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence North 1°06'22" West a distance of 235.00 feet; Thence North 34°58'05" West a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thencc North 88°15' 15" West a distance of 170.00 feet; Thence North 11 °06'22" West a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 46°06'22" West a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 185.29 feet to an intersection with the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North along said East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the South Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. and also known as Devils Elbow) ; Thence Southeasterly along said Right-of-Way Line to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northwest with a radius of 80.00 feet, and a center which bears North 38°15' 25" East; fence Easterly and Northerly along said curve an arc distance of 213.84 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of said 120th Place Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet and a center which bears North 65°06 '50" East; 0 Thence Northerly `long said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line an arc distance of 72.3 feet to the point of reverse curve, said curve being concave to the Southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; Thence Northwesterly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to a point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 feet; Page 1 of 2 Thence North 49°23'20" West along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 60.0 feet and a center which bears North 40°36'40" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the West Line of the East 1111 .28 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence Northerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the Plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats, Page 93, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 88°15'36" East a distance of 55.60 feet; Thence South 1 °16'00" West a distance of 205.00 feet;= Thence South 24°14 '00" East a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence South 32°14 '00" East a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 81 °42'58" East a distance of 311 . 13 feet; Thence North 57°15'59" East a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15159" West a distance of 160.00 feet; Thence South 57°15'59" West a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 9°08' 56" East a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15159" West a distance of 114.74 feet; Thence North 83°19'25" West a distance of 448.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1F.3.21 .AJH:mf 01/18/88 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT C HONEY CREEK RED phase I PARCEL C R-1 zoning That portion Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1 '15' 59" East a distance of 1034.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 57'15'59" West a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 81'42' 58" West a distance of 311. 13 feet; Thence North 32.14 ' 00" West a distance of 330.00 feet ; Thence North 24'14 ' 00" West a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence North l'16 ' 00" East a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 88'15 ' 36" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 1'15 '59" West a distance of 392.70 feet; Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 555.64 feet; Thence South 1'15 '59" West a distance of 480.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. TOGETHER 'iWITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned Southwest Corner; Thence South 88. 19' 25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South ine of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance or 114. 74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 88.19 ' 25" West a distance of 280.00 feet ; Thence North 9. 08 '56" West a distance of 514. 84 feet ; Thence North 57'15 ' 59" East a distance of 450.0J feet; Thence South 1'15 ' 59" West a distance of 760. 00 feet ; to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 2 TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North 0'53' 38" East a distance of 630.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 0'53' 38" East a distance of 538.25 feet; Thence South 46'06'22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 11'06 '22" East a distance of 1-05..00 feet; Thence North 88'15' 15" West a distance of 110.00 feet; Thence South 0'53 '38" West a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 48'06' 22" East a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence South 83'06 ' 22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet ; Thence North 88' 19 ' 25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; Thence North 0'53' 38" East a distance of 630 .00 feet ; Thence North 88'19' 25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point of beginning. Page 2 of 2 1F.H. 3. 11 . AJH:nf 12/11/87 March 14, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 79 Ordinance *4138 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Zoning: Group I, Parcel at 275 Bronson Way NE within the City of Renton from L-1, light industry, E-1, Group Health to B-1, business, classification (Group I, Parcel E-1, Group Health Clinic). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4139 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Zoning: Group I, Parcel at 1901 NE 3rd Street from L-1, light industry, to R-3, medium density E-1, Monterey Manor multifamily, classification (Group I, Parcel E-1, Monterey Manor). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL. ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4140 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Zoning: Group I, Parcel at 1901 NE 3rd Street from L-1, light industry, to R-3, medium density E-1, Vuemont multifamily, classification (Group I, Parcel E-1, Vuemont Apartments/Cugini Apartments/Cugini Properties). MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- Property WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, TRIMM, REED, MATHEWS, NELSON, HUGHES. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke expressed concern regarding lack of buffering between subject property and existing single family homes. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Rezone: Honey Creek, R- An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located 014-84 in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE from General Classification District (G-1) to single family residential district (R-1) and low density multifamily residential district (R-2) and General Classification District (G-1) for Honey Creek Associates, R-014-84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. PUD: Preliminary, Honey An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development in Creek, PPUD-015-84 the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow for Honey Creek Associates, PPUD-015-84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Annexation: Covenant An ordinance was read annexing 24.09 acres located on SE Carr Road Church between Talbot Road South and 104th Avenue SE to the City of Renton for Covenant Church (A-005-86). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 38958 through 39378 in the amount of 2,083,763.21, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 38971-38973 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Upon inquiry, Council President Keolker-Wheeler announced that unless of Committee Reports emergency nature, committee reports or other old business would be presented only at first and third regular Council meetings. Rezone: Lomas (One MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER Valley Place), Seafirst, SUBJECT MATTERS OF ONE VALLEY PLACE RESTRICTIVE R-088-86 COVENANTS AND VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONGREGATE CARE FACILITIES TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented the following emergency committee reports for adoption: WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 14, 1988 ORDIN/NCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading : Ordinance Adopting Washington Association of Sheriffs' and Police Standards for Hold Facilities by Reference Rezone Ordinances, Group 1, Parcel E-1 Vuemont Apts./Cugini Property Monterey Manor Apartments Group Health Clinic The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first readirg: Honey Creek Associates Rezone (R-014-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Honey Creek Associates PPUD (PPUD-015-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow) Covenant Church Annexation (A-005-86) - located at S.E. Carr Road between Talbot Road S. and 104th Avenue S.E. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 38958 through No. 3S378 in the amount of $2,083,763.21, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 38971-38973 machine voided. G Richard Stredicke, Chairman Robe Hughes Nancy Mathews March 14. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 79 Ordinance #4138 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Zoning: Group I, Parcel at 275 Bronson Way NE within the City of Renton from L-1, light industry, E-1, Group Health to B-1, business, classification (Group I, Parcel E-1, Group Health Clinic). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4139 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Zoning: Group I, Parcel at 1901 NE 3rd Street from L-1, light industry, to R-3, medium density E-1, Monterey Manor multifamily, classification (Group I, Parcel E-1, Monterey Manor). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL. ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4140 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Zoning: Group I, Parcel at 1901 NE 3rd Street from L-1, light industry, to R-3, medium density E-1, Vuemont multifamily, classification (Group I, Parcel E-1, Vuemont Apartments/Cugini Apartments/Cugini Properties). MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- Property WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, TRIMM, REED, MATHEWS, NELSON, HUGHES. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke expressed concern regarding lack of buffering between subject property and existing single family homes. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Rezone: Honey Creek, R- An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located 014-84 in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE from General Classification District (G-1) to single family residential district (R-1) and low density multifamily residential district (R-2) and General Classification District (G-1) for Honey Creek Associates, R-014-84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. PUD: Preliminary, Honey An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development in Creek, PPUD-015-84 the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow for Honey Creek Associates, PPUD-015-84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Annexation: Covenant An ordinance was read annexing 24.09 acres located on SE Carr Road Church between Talbot Road South and 104th Avenue SE to the City of Renton for Covenant Church (A-005-86). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 38958 through 39378 in the amount of 2,083,763.21, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 38971-38973 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Upon inquiry, Council President Keolker-Wheeler announced that unless of Committee Reports emergency nature, committee reports or other old business would be presented only at first and third regular Council meetings. Rezone: Lomas (One MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER Valley Place), Seafirst, SUBJECT MATTERS OF ONE VALLEY PLACE RESTRICTIVE R-088-86 COVENANTS AND VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CONGREGATE CARE FACILITIES TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented the following emergency committee reports for adoption: WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 14, 1988 ORDI NAN(.ES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and finil reading : Ordinance Adopting Washington Association of Sheriffs' and Police Standards for Hold Facilities by Reference Fezone Ordinances, Group 1, Parcel E-1 Vuemont Apts./Cugini Property Monterey Manor Apartments Group Health Clinic The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first readirg : Honey Creek Associates Rezone (R-014-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Honey Creek Associates PPUD (PPUD-015-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow) Covenant Church Annexation (A-005-86) - located at S.E. Carr Road between Talbot Road S. and 104th Avenue S.E. APPR)VAL OF VOUCHERS The days and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 38958 through No. 39378 in the amount of $2,083,763.21, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 38971 -38973 machine voided. Richard Stredicke, Chairman Ro) Hughes NEncy Mathews i C CITY OF RENTON MI FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk March 10 , 1988 Honey Creek Associates 5611 119th S. E. , Suite #2 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Subject : PPUD-015-84 Honey Creek Associates Dear Mr . Tomberg and Mr . Santa : The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of March 7 , 1988 adopted the Transportation Committee report concurring with the Public Works Department recommendation to require a 28 foot street section face-of-curb to face-of-curb with a five foot sidewalk placed on the south side. The report further stated that the right-of-way required will be a minimum of 20 feet on the south, plus a possible need for additional slope easements . The Transportation Committee report was in response to the February 1 , 1988 City Council referral of letter from Lawrence Warren, City Attorney, discussing ambiguities raised by Michael M. Hanis , Hanis and Olson, on behalf of area residerits regarding access on N . E . 23rd Street to the Honey Creek Associates planned unit development . If you have further questions , please do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours truly , CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor , CMC City Clerk cc: Mr. John L . Hendrickson, Shidler McBroom Gates & Lucas Mr . Mel Easter , Johnson Braund Design Group 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 i 0 CITY OF RENTON 1 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk March 10 , 1988 Mr . Michael M. Hanis Hanis and Olson 3900 East Valley Highway, Suite 203 Renton, Washington 98055 Subject : PPUD-015-84 Honey Creek Associates Dear Mr . Hanis : The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of March 7 , 1988 adopted the Transportation Committee report concurring with the Public Works Department recommendation to require a 28 foot street section face-of-curb to face-of-curb with a five foot sidewalk placed on the south side. The report further stated that the right-of-way required will be a minimum of 20 feet on the south, plus a possible need for additional slope easements . The Transportation Committee report was in response to the February 1 , 1988 City Council referral of letter from Lawrence Warren, City Attorney, discussing ambiguities raised by your letter on behalf of area residents regarding access on N . E . 23rd Street to the Honey Creek Associates planned unit development . If you have further questions , please do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E . Motor , CMC City Clerk cc: Mr . Mitch Murray 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 T0:• Jeariette Samek-McI e DATE 3/9/88 Y '.- ` ,L NIC N FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: Ordinance PPUD 015-84 Honey Creek Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: 7r n[h11 r T r 7 J Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition Map Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants Verify Content Please advise attachments for this ordinance. Enclosed are A, B, C & D from the rezone ordinance, along with map. Thanks a bunch. THANK YOU! Requested by: Z41- 8 a nos or, f-Ar;_ frP:901 ( 7040 AYY 0112 rr' , t7 flPvi 4<:g r n C) rV W 2 -z1- ET I CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT G-1 ) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (R-1) AND (R-2 ) AND GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G-1 )HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES R-014-84 ) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G-1 ) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department on or about January 24 , 1984 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing , and public hearings having been held thereon on or about February 19, 1985 , December 31 , 1985 and May 12 , 1986 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request having been granted with conditions and the matter having been appealed to the City Council and the City Council having modified the Hearing Examiner ' s decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE 1 i THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned as hereinbelow specified; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: R-2 : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. R-l : See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein) G-1 See Exhibit" "C" and "D" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein) Said property being located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. ) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-Owners on or about March 1988 , and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No. and which said Covenants are hereby incorporated and made a part hereof as if fully set forth. AND FURTHER SUBJECT to th te-n conditions mposed by the 7 City Council at its meeting o •pril 14, 1986 . SECTION II : This 'rdinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and ive days after its publication. 2 I PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of March, 1988 . Maxine E. Motor , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of March, 1988 . Earl Clymer , Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD14/2/26/88 3 EXHIBIT "A" HONE REEK REZONE phase I PARCEL A • 2 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 83°06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence North 48°06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 34°58'05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence South 1°06'22" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 1F.H.3.12.AJH:mf 11/13/87 EXHIBIT "B" HONEY CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL C R-1 zoning That portion Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15'59" East a distance of 1034.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 57'15'59" West a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 81'42'58" West a distance of 311. 13 feet; Thence North 32'14'00" West a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 24.14'00" West a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence North 1'16'00" East a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 88'15'36" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 392.70 feet; Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 555.64 feet; Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 480.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned Southwest Corner; Thence South 88' 19'25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance of 114.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence North 9'08'56" West a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence North 57'15' 59" East a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 1'15' 59" West a distance of 760.00 feet; to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 2 TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 0'53'38" East a distance of 538.25 feet; Thence South 46'06'22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 11'06'22" East a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 88'15' 15" West a distance of 110.00 feet; Thence South 0'53'38" West a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 48'06' 22" East a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence South 83'06'22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Page 2 of 2 1F.H.3.11.AJH:mf 12/11/87 EXHIBIT "C" HONEY CREEK REZL..._ phase I PARCEL B G-1 zoni.., That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence North l°06'22" West a distance of 235.00 feet; Thence North 34°58'05" West a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence North 88°15' 15" West a distance of 170.00 feet; Thence North 11°06'22" West a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 46°06'22" West a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 185.29 feet to an intersection with the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North along said East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the South Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. and also known as Devils Elbow) ; Thence Southeasterly along said Right-of-Way Line to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northwest with a radius of 80.00 feet, and a center which bears North 38°15'25" East; Thence Easterly and Northerly along said curve an arc distance of 213.84 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of said 120th Place Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet and a center which bears North 65°06'50" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line an arc distance of 72.3 feet to the point of reverse curve, said curve being concave to the Southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; Thence Northwesterly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to a point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 feet; Page 1 of 2 Thence North 49°23' 20" West along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 60.0 feet and a center which bears North 40°36'40" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the West Line of the East 1111 .28 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence Northerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the Plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats, Page 93, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 88°15'36" East a distance of 55.60 feet; Thence South 1 °16'00" West a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 24°14'00" East a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence South 32°14'00" East a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 81°42'58" East a distance of 311 . 13 feet; Thence North 57°15' 59" East a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15'59" West a distance of 160.00 feet; Thence South 57°15'59" West a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 9°08'56" East a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15'59" West a distance of 114.74 feet; Thence North 88°19'25" West a distance of 448.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1F.3.21 .AJH:mf 01/18/88 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "D" HONEYCREEK REZONE - Parcel D G-1 zoning TIQat portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, ashington, more particularly described as follows: Commenc •ng at the Northeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 said point a \so being the True Point of Beginning; Thence South, 01 °16' 12" East along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to 'an intersection with the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of`said Section 4, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Rento n as\ annexed under Ordinance No. 1490; Thence West along said South line to an intersection with the East line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 3401 a distance of 320. 12 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing City of Renton limits a distance of 430 feet; Thence West and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1246 a distance of 320.81 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing limits of the City to an intersection with the South line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1622 a distance of 500 feet more or less; Thence East along said City limits a distance of 321 .6 feet more or less; Thence North and continuing along said City limits, to an intersection with the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence East along said North line to the Northeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 a distance of 322.20 feet and the True Point of Beginning. LeteLL-- Page 1 of 1 1F.3. 17.AJH:mf 12/11/87 an • 6l'' • • ' ` 40,D. IVl,v,l 'V•L •` I.... i • 10V#10811:4202-z.. T. 1 L f• at„- v-vOxtA(Yl1c M:r PAC lt=IC COA I / I sae. ' Il Iseti t gym a••- 1 i A E1`- t E7STO1yi' DSO 1 1 1Yr0 1 i...5T9 1. AI. ivr.,,.'. 1 197 4, -3,,,,,r 7''/ie L17(7 `•14,9F, t .ta•F• ;,* 1 11L?O ; iRENTrIV CITY LIMIT' 1, ti F n 1iI 9•••••49-? c tv,...9,:i•,,. WIIKA4111t0IizPzrAil4„ ion.. „......1.0., L... • ..sli 7 10I ` 6 U{•a1T i• 5,....i1IpeIIE s tL :4 t}.ix s Q'. 1''a1'' 3 le 11 i .:n ease i i s e2505see es11 • .A' a: Y 1 ' it t N oJa y tI> . 11"41:1131111g2 Olgill • a „. T,..;,2!' w,;,. i.,:;,!?!.'.,. . ,... ,,,,, ;.i,..C.`,`, :-P-, t,',',!''''',1111 gips% ,..sup..-. yr / 1, .- til InallalgittLI6 :::::•:•:::•:•:::::::::: . 1'., 5 :..4:;.• 141iillirli. .. • rl'ir,.' le I .ot rip A . a a,i;,,,- 1 • ONO !!! C. WNW Ex g m • 1i 1 O Par.a G V ` '•.' a• - 1. • r 1flillEn 101.-.., ..' rt srlf.ri'•:.)'!'i,'C`:;',',.;t(4,..1. aii toe, I ! AL 0:; E 1[1 s ..'4: b t 1 pionza O •G+OOL-,,j p s E,., 1,- .Its' . T i i w, .0t1012_ w y.. J. t, t' ' al; • i.d..,..`ihXtt 7R% •'ark istarit 1 MINI Cali H N • •e •• NORTH 3 i .. 11 ll • . HIGNL. 1 sao Wei e rAy. • • -' 1 i34 ••` I Via'-;L° ' _ 1 11161 1 i 'r A`'`. r ,a IT i 1 4. 0; g . oa d e r'. , I coits n`Is m IN I t Yr ri. a• t ne t„t Kas b1T lest© '• ,. " se i ( Tow7iLICJRcIIGHszi.ipol, 3C 4001. A .i r •,''InprA r I e yl , 7 I wi . ftltaar i March 7. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 70 RECESS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 9:10 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:20 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. AUDIENCE COMMENT Hal Brandt, 12727 SE 63rd Street, Bellevue, requested that the public hearing continued) on LID 334 be postponed to later date to provide additional time for him to LID: 334, NE 44th Street review the matter and prepare a response. Mayor Clymer advised that and Lake Washington because LID participants had already left the meeting, he recommended Boulevard against changing the continued hearing date of 3/21/88. Citizen Comment: Randy Korman, 2216 Harrington Place NE, Renton, owner of the 280-foot Korman - Honey Creek by 20-foot strip of land required to develop the NE 23rd Street access to PPUD 015-84 Honey creek PPUD, asked Council to re-evaluate the matter of Devil's Elbow Road and and refer the subject back to Transportation Committee. Referring to a vicinity map, Mr. Korman pointed out difficulties in developing access via NE 23rd Street due to hilly terrain and steep grade, noting that costly excavation, construction of bulkheads, and property acquisition may increase cost of road to $200,000, the same amount required to stabilize Devil's Elbow Road. He urged that instead of improving NE 23rd Street as access to the Honey Creek PPUD, the developer instead be required to contribute required funds to upgrade the western half of Devil's Elbow Road. Citizen Comment: Velte - a Chuck Velte, 12117 SE 96th Place, Renton, advised that 32 families in Honey Creek j Paradise Estates as well as 50 other families located northeast of Devil's PPUD-015-84 Elbow Road have suffered negative economic, environmental and safety impacts as a result of closure of Devil's Elbow Road by the City. He reported that the road has been in existence since 1894; follows the same centerline as originally established; and is designated as Federal Collector Arterial #1334 which makes the roadway eligible for Urban Arterial Funds. Mr. Velte blamed closure of the road for increasing response time for emergency vehicles as well as causing inconvenience and increased travel time for residents in reaching schools, shopping areas, bus stops and freeways. In addition, he stated that the road closure has had damaging effects on property values and has not curbed illegal dumping along the route. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At Council request, items 6.g. and 6.n. were removed for separate consideration. Claim: Ritchie, CL-11-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $396.06, filed by Jill Ritchey, 812 High Avenue South, Renton, for compensation for sewer repair which was allegedly the City's responsibility (11/25/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Schulz, CL-12-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $500.00 filed by J. Anthony Hoare, attorney for Beth Schulz, 900 Waterfront Place, 1011 Western Avenue, Seattle, for vehicle damage allegedly caused when struck by garbage dumpster at 3306 Lake Washington Boulevard (11/3/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Zoning: Group I, Parcel City Clerk requested public hearing be set on 4/18/88 to consider City- H-2, NE Park Drive initiated Group I rezone for Parcel H-2, NE Park Drive. Council concur. Zoning: Group I, Parcel City Clerk requested public hearing be reset on 4/4/88 for City-initiated A, May Creek Group I rezone for Parcel A, May Creek, located on Jones Road between NE 30th and NE 36th Street (first hearing held on 1/18/88). Council concur. Vacation: VAC-88-001,City Clerk submitted Fernwood North Homeowners' Association petitions for Bremerton Place NE, vacation of portion of Bremerton Place NE, east of Union Avenue SE (SE Fernwood North 132nd Street) and south of NE 4th Street (VAC-001-88). Refer to Ways and Homeowners' Association Means Committee for resolution setting public hearing on 4/18/88 and to Board of Public Works for review and recommendation. Vacation: VAC-87-005,City Clerk requested change in public hearing date from 3/14/88 to 5/2/88 to N. 52nd Street/Ripley consider vacation of portion of N. 52nd Street at Ripley Lane N. petitioned Lane, Ioppolo by Linda Ioppolo (VAC-005-87). Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting public hearing on 5/2/88 (referred to Board of public Works on 2/1/88). March 7. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 68 Council President Keolker-Wheeler reported that a special election would cost from $15,000 to $18,000. **Amendment to motion withdrawn. *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL GO ON RECORD AS SUPPORTING EITHER A PUBLIC VOTE BY CITIZENS OF RENTON RELATIVE TO THE FAIRWOOD ANNEXATION AND/OR APPROPRIATION OF MONIES FOR EQUAL SURVEY OF CITIZENS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD AND/OR A SERIES OF PUBLIC HEARINGS OR PUBLIC MEETINGS FOR INFORMATION OF CITY OF RENTON RESIDENTS. AMENDMENT CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. It was clarified that public meetings will not necessarily be confined to City Hall, and the City will do whatever is necessary to provide information to residents to enable them to make an informed decision about the annexation proposal. AUDIENCE COMMENT Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue NE, Renton, favored the annexation Citizen Comment: Walker process recently used by Kirkland when it doubled its land area and Fairwood Annexation population in approving Washington's largest annexation in 20 years. She North Soos Creek) suggested dividing up large potential annexation areas, selecting representatives from within adjacent City areas to serve on advisory committees, developing an annexation policy, executing interlocal agreement with King County, and considering U.S. Census Enumeration Districts as a guide for setting City boundaries. Councilwoman Mathews clarified that the survey is to assess attitudes of people in proposed annexing areas to establish a maximum boundary to study; and after study and receipt of input from department heads and the community, actual boundaries would be established. Citizen Comment: Violet Anderson (address above) questioned whether large residential areas Anderson - Fairwood and rural areas will be surveyed separately. Mr. Parness emphasized that the Annexation (North Soos survey will be designed to determine results from each separate geographical Creek)area, and results from a very general and brief survey will not be used by City staff to form annexation boundaries, but rather to determine level of interest. Upon inquiry, he advised that survey questions will be neutral and phrased in a manner to identify areas of resistance or support. Citizen Comment: Hellene Tom Hellene, 18233 141st Avenue SE, Renton, explained that the potential Fairwood Annexation annexation area is being expanded to determine appropriate service areas and North Soos Creek) impose an element of control. He agreed that public hearings or meetings should be held to educate residents, and noted that meetings will be held with Lake Desire residents this week. Citizen Comment: Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, indicated disappointment that only Fairwood Annexation public meetings would be held with residents, and questioned why citizens of North Soos Creek) Renton are paying for the survey. It was clarified that all options are available--public meetings, public hearings and surveys--and by state law, a public hearing must be held by the City Council prior to accepting an exation. Advancement Requested Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, requested advancement to Old Business, Transportation Committee Report, regarding Honey Creek PUD. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Committee the recommendation of the Public Works Department to require a 28-foot PUD: Preliminary_ Honey street section face-of-curb to face-of-curb with a five-foot sidewalk placed Creek. PPUD 015-84 on the south side of NE 23rd Street for the Honey Creek Preliminary PUD. A minimum 20 feet of right-of-way will be required on the south plus additional footage for slope easements, if determined necessary. Displaying a map of the Honey Creek PUD, Mr. Murray described proposed access to the site via Jefferson to Harrington, both 60 feet wide roadways, and via 23rd Street, which is proposed to be widened from 20 to 40 or 60 feet. He requested that the matter of site access via Devil's Elbow Road instead of 23rd Street be referred back to the Transportation Committee for further review, and cited the City's 1987 geotechnical study which estimated that the roadway could be stabilized for a cost of $92,000, and reopened for traffic access to the east and access to the sewer pump station serving the Highlands. Referencing recent Cedar River dredging project, Mr. Murray suggested that gravel removed from that site could be transferred to Devil's Elbow, thereby saving the City approximately $30,000 in cost of gravel to w March 7. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 69 stabilize the road. He also suggested that instead of improving NE 23rd Street, which he estimated to cost $200,000, the developer contribute funds towards restoring Devil's Elbow Road. Councilman Hughes recalled that approval of the Honey Creek PUD was conditioned upon improvement of NE 23rd Street. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. (See later comments.) PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published, and LID: 334, NE 44th Street mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Clymer opened the and Lake Washington public hearing to consider the preliminary assessment roll in the total amount Boulevard of $1,823,943.75 for Local Improvement District No. 334, NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard utility and roadway improvements. Total assessed valuation of property included in the LID is $9,191,000. Correspondence was read from Public Works Director Richard Houghton reporting that as of 5:00 p.m. on 3/7/88 no protests to the LID were received. Correspondence protesting the LID was received after 5:00 p.m.on 3/7/88 from Roger Urbaniak, Managing Partner of Garden of Eden Joint Venture, Bellmond Realty, Inc., 919 124th Avenue NE, Suite 104, Bellevue, representing owners of Parcels #11, #12, and #13; Norman McCue, May Creek Associates, owner of Parcel #4 (Renton Short Plat 052-86); and from members of Kao Ming-Tsong family, owners of Parcel #9. Mr. Houghton indicated that owners of Parcel #9 have signed restrictive covenants agreeing to participate in the LID, and a deferral of off-site improvements, required as a condition of approval of the short plat, has been granted by the Board of Public Works for Parcel #4. He reported that including Parcel #9, the total percentage of protest is 28.76%. Without Parcel #9, protests represent 16.15% of the total ownership. Restrictive covenants have also been executed by owners of Parcels #1, #6, and #10. Parcels #1, #7, and #8 are outside the City limits. Audience comment was invited. Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, questioned current zoning classification and location of the southern boundary of Parcel #10. Mr. Houghton advised that B-1, business, zoning exists on the site, and he provided Mr. Evans with a legal description of the parcel. Mike Wensman, 10900 NE 8th Street, Bellevue, owner and developer of Lot 3, questioned increase of proposed LID assessment from $250,000 in August, 1987, to current assessment of $355,000. Mr. Houghton attributed the increase to addition of $400,000 to the total LID estimate to cover engineering, administrative, interim financing and bonding costs. Norman McCue, P.O. Box 622, Kirkland, indicated concern with increased assessment for Parcel #4 from $81,266 to $181,996 since October, 1986. Noting that a sewer trunk line terminates at the property line, he questioned inclusion of $48,441 for sewer connector as well as assessment for traffic signal at N. 44th Street on-ramp. Roger Urbaniak, 4112 78th SE, Mercer Island, representing owners of Parcels 11, #12, and #13, indicated that properties were purchased by three families 15 years ago for retirement purposes, and rezone of the sites is currently being sought. He questioned whether the LID includes development of Lincoln Avenue for the purpose of diverting storm drainage, and reported that he was not contacted to sign the LID petition. It was clarified that notices were sent to all LID participants 30 days prior to the date of public hearing. Michael Dietch, 4126 187th SE, Issaquah, representing Parcel #2, questioned increased assessment from $8,750 to $39,516. Mr. Houghton reported that because the parcel was developed and all off-site improvements were installed, including street light, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, no front footage charges were assessed. However, the property owner is being required to participate in cost of storm drainage facilities and traffic signal at the on-ramp for the interchange. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING FOR TWO WEEKS TO MARCH 21, 1988. CARRIED. It was noted that the two week continuation would give participants the opportunity to meet with Public Works Department staff to discuss concerns. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 7, 1988 HONEY CREEK PUD (Referred 2/1/88) The Transportation Committee recommends Council concur with the recommendation of the Public Works Department to require a 28 foot street section face-of-curb to face-of-curb with a 5 foot sidewalk placed on the south side. The right-of-way required will be a minimum of 20 feet on the south plus there may be a need for additional slope easements. REQUEST FOR SPRINGBROOK TROUT FARM DIRECTIONAL SIGN ON SR-167 Referred 2/1/88) The Transportation Committee recommends Council concur with the recommendation of the Public Works Department to not allow directional signs to private businesses. DEBOER LETTER REGARDING CBD SIGNING AND PARKING (Referred 12/14/87) The Transportation Committee recommends Council concur with the recommendation of the Public Works Department to not change the stop signs at South 4th Street and Wells Avenue South, however, the Committee does recommend the parking on the south side of South 4th Street, between Wells Avenue South and Main Avenue South, be removed. REQUEST TO CHANGE LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD. DESIGNATION (Referred 11/23/87) ARTERIAL ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (Referred 1/18/88) The Transportation Committee recommends that these issues be addressed at the public hearing on the Six Year Street Program. Toni Nelson, Chair Thomas Trimm 4442r Richard Stredicke February 22, 1988 Renton City Council Minute Page 62 Zoning: Group I, Parcel An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of group I, city- F-2(b) & F-2(d), Old initiated rezone property located on S. 4th Street between Whitworth and Hospital Area, Rainier Morris Streets from P-1, public, to R-1, single family residential; and Avenue property located on Shattuck Avenue S. south of S. 4th Street from P-1, public, to B-1, business, use (old hospital area). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Public Works: 1988 An ordinance was read adopting 1988 Standard Specifications for Road and Standards for Road & Bridge and Municipal Construction by reference. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Bridge Construction SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Rezone: McLean, R-078- An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located 87 at 415 Wells Avenue South from R-1, single family residential, to B-1, business, zone for McLean, R-078-87. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Rezone: Craftsman An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Homes, Inc., R-039-87,on the west side of Duvall Avenue NE between NE 17th Street and NE 21st and Preliminary Plat, PP- Street from G-1, general classification district, to R-1, single family 040-87 residential, zone for Craftsman Homes, Inc., R-039-87. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Finance: Departmental Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Remodeling and Position recommending that the following Finance Department requests be referred Funding back on the Council floor for review by the full Council: funding in the amount of $11,500 to expand the computer room and associated first floor remodeling; appropriation of $7,500 in microfilm budget to cover cost of filming backlog of documents by service company to reduce records storage requirements; and addition of programmer analyst position to Data Processing staff to assist Police Department with data conversion and installation/operation of new system. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Finance Director Dan Clements explained space, remodeling and staffing requirements to support and accommodate new computer system on the first floor, noting that Police Department projects currently being contracted out will be assigned to the new programmer analyst and done in- house. *MOTION CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 38229 through 38957 in the amount of 893,254.71, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 38562-36577 and 38559 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler referenced Park Board minutes of 2/9/88 Board/Commission: Park and questioned legal authority for charging fee to the 11 th District Board Fees for City Democratic organization for using the Highlands Community Center to hold a Buildings multi-precinct caucus on March 8th. City Attorney Warren defined City buildings which would qualify for use as public forums, and noted his opinion that a fee should be charged for use of the Highlands Community Center since it does not meet the definition. He advised authority of Council and/or Park Board to modify the policy for certain uses. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL WAIVE THE FEES FOR CAUCUSES REGARDLESS OF PARTY AFFILIATION. CARRIED. Board/Commission: AWC Referencing survey for boards and commissions contained in recent Survey Association of Washington Cities newsletter, Councilman Reed requested that members of Renton boards and commissions complete the survey, and results be forwarded to Council members. Mayor Clymer agreed to pursue the matter. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, questioned when the matter of PUD: Preliminary, Homy Honey Creek PUD access will be discussed by the Transportation Committee. Creek, PPUD-015-84 Chairman Nelson reported that the topic will be discussed at Committee meeting on 2/23/88. BOB ; UMDERG 1 eV'4- HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA, RECEIVED 5611 119 SE SUITE BELLEVUE, WA 98006 FEB 9 19$746-1 '1 81 8 CITY OF RENTON T O: TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS CITY COUNCIL FROM: BOB TOMBERG (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES) RE: N. E. 23RD AND HONEY CREEK PUD FEB. 8, 1988 DEAR TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE MEMBERS: I AM WRITING IN RESPONSE TO MR. WARRENS LETTER TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATED JANUARY 27, 1988 WHICH HAS BEEN REFERED TO YOUR COMMITTEE FROM THE COUNCIL. I WILL USE THE SAME NUMERICAL ORDER USED IN MR. WARREN' S LETTER TO AVOID ANY CONFUSION. 1 . THERE HAS BEEN A 20 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY ESTABLISHED FOR THE NORTH ONE- HALF OF THE ROAD. THIS RIGHT OF WAY HAS BEEN IN EXISTANCE FOR MANY YEARS. IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ORIGINAL INTENT WAS TO TAKE TWENTY FEET FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY OWNERS AND THE SOUTH PROPERTY OWNERS TO PROVIDE FOR THE STREET. IF A LARGER ROAD IS DEEMED NECESSARY THEN DON' T YOU HAVE TO GO BACK AND ACQUIRE TEN MORE FEET FROM THE NORTH PROPERY OWNERS AS WELL AS THIRTY FEET FROM THE SOUTH? 2. THE CONTINUATION OF NE 23rd WEST OF 'THE PROPOSED SITE IS A FOURTY FOOT RIGHT OF WAY. IT CERTAINLY MAKES LITTLE SENSE TO HAVE A SIXTY FOOT ROAD FOR ONE BLOCK ONLY TO HAVE IT FUNNEL BACK DOWN TO FOURTY FEET AFTER SUCH A SHORT DISTANCE. MR HOUGHTON IS ON RECORD INDICATING A FOURTY FOOT RIGHT OF WAY WOULD BE ADEQUATE TO BUILD THE NECESSARY TRAVEL LANES AND ASSOCIATED STREET IMPROVEMENTS. 4. THEDEVILS ELBOWROAD IS NOT A NEW ISSUE IN THESE PRECEEDINGS. t t ..; SE. DEVILS E L BOW AND WERE TOLD THATTHEWEORIu=OC•,A: SOUGHT A•, FROM OAD WOULD NOT BE ADEQUATE AND THE GRADE FROM THE ROAD WOULD ALSO NOT BE OU FOR ANY KIND E^ OUR PROJECT. MR MURRY WAS t-__• uATE Oi•. H!- THAT L7 OF NC S TO i . . E;-BECAUSE1 Ei. I `'. ST.THA 1 W fiH 1 L 1 T 1 T T V WE ALLOWEDED HIM ASOURISIter,• 1 iGU L TRY THAT L Ess?:laA ' = q t AL W_L HIM, EF'RESNTA T IVE, TO SUBMIT HIS PLANS FOR DEVILS ELBOW ACESS. THIS ALSO wAS REJ E!T ED BY YOUR STAFF. ANY EXPERT THAT HAS LOOKED AT DEVILS ELBOW HAP STATED THAT IT SHOULD NnT RI= uS=n OR EVFN ALLOWED TO BE !FENED. OURR T STATEMENT D i= •;I i ELBOWPROPERTYWASANNEXEDWITHTHETHATDEVILS __ .sOifJ SHOULD kOT - - ---- c:i-at- S - i..^ 1 iR THIS I=ct E / 1;ATN AFTER YE ^i. .-:- T : . r ANSWERING L t L J: ice:ir.au : _ .- - :r- . ..—. .-..... 1:... ... y^ 1 THIS SAME QUESTION IS BORDERING ON HARRASSI'IENT.. I STAND READ''`: 0 ANSWER= AI'Y QUESTIONS THAT I CAN AND HOPE THAT THESE I DS IES LAN •"IMr.: TO A `Di-=_,'v H:;_^`L....i•I ON BOB ! OMBE: b CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk MEMORANDUM Date: February 12, 1988 To: Lawrence Warren, City Attorney cc: Jeannette Samek--F1cKague, Zoning From: Maxine Motor, City Cler Subject:Honey Creek Rezone R-Ol -84 and PPUD-015-84 File Attached Please prepare a Preliminary PUD Ordinance in accordance with the new PUD requirements shown in 4-2711 4. F. The conditions as shown in the Planning and Development Committee report and Council Minutes of April 14, 1986, should be stated in the PUD ordinance. This will aid Staff in review of further applications on site and that conditions are not missed . Please prepare restrictive covenants to the rezone ordinance which you have prepared and now revised under your cover letter dated February 4, 1988. The covenants to the rezone should contain information in Council Minutes of April 14, 1986, Page 5 , shown in the attached file. (1 ) The rezone is predicated upon PUD being accomplished through the PUD process . 2) Parcels east of Honey Creek, prior to development, must submit geo- technical report and site plan. Thank you for your consideration. I e. y- J ‘71AVF 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 February 8, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 43 Ordinance #4127 An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section I-4102 of Title I Police: Fee for Walk-In Administrative) of City Code relating to miscellaneous charges for police Prisoners services and increasing daily jail charge for walk-in commitments from $25 to $35 per day. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THIS ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4128 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Rezone: Henderson at 4922 and 5020 NE 20th Place from general classification (G-1) to single Homes, Inc.,family residential classification (R-1) for Henderson Homes, Inc., R-077-87. Summerwind III, IV, V,MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT VI, R-077-87 THIS ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Zoning: Group I, Parcel An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located D-4, Wells and Williams at 407 Wells Avenue S., and 410, 414 and 416 Williams Avenue S. from B-P, Avenue business parking, to B-1, business, zone as approved in City-initiated Group I rezones for Parcels D-4. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Rezone: Honey Creek, R- An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification for property located 014-84 in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE from General District (G-1) to residence districts (R-1, R-2) and general classification district (G-1) for Honey Creek Associates, R-014-84. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Fire: Fire Lane Color An ordinance was read amending a portion of Section 4-2204 of Title IV Change Building Regulations) of City Code specifying marking of fire lanes. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following resolutions for reading and adoption. Resolution #2706 A resolution was read declaring an emergency and authorizing expenditure of Fire: Well No. 3 75,000 to study and take steps to remedy contamination problem as a result Contamination of finding of petrochemical contaminants in Well No. 3. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Mayor Clymer reported that Well #3 has been shut down since December upon finding of contamination. Investigation is underway to determine source of the contaminant and repair the damage. Fire: Olympic Pipeline Upon inquiry regarding the status of Olympic Pipeline leak in the Maplewood Leak, Maplewood Heights Heights area reported in October, 1986, Fire Chief Wheeler advised that the Fire Department has continued to monitor houses in the area and no increased levels of contamination have been found. Resolution #2707 A resolution was read setting a public hearing on March 14, 1988, to consider Vacation: VAC-005-87, a petition to vacate a portion of N. 52nd Street in the vicinity of Ripley Lane N. 52nd Street, Ioppolo North (Ioppolo). MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: 1988 Seattle- Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report King County Economic recommending concurrence in the recommendation of the Finance Director to Development Council approve the 1988 contract for the Seattle-King County Economic Development Council to continue the same work plan provided by the Economic Development Council the past few years. The fee of $3,536 is based upon a per capita rate of $0.10. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the agreement. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT FEBRUARY 8, 1988 ORDIN\LACES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Annual Zoning Map Daily Fee Revision for Walk-In Prisoners Henderson Homes, Inc. Rezone (Summerwind II) R-077-87 - 73-lot single family subdivision consisting of 17. 1 acres at 2200-2300 block of Duvall Ave. NE The W,xys and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Rezone Ordinance of City-Initiated Rezone - Group 1 - Parcel D-4 407 Wells Avenue, 410, 414 and 416 Williams Avenue South) Honey Creek Associates Rezone (R-014-84) - Located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Ordinance Amending Fire Lanes The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption : Emergency Resolution with Reference to Well #3 Resolution Setting Public Hearing date of March 14, 1988, for vacation of portion of N. 52nd Street in the vicinity of Ripley Lane N. ( Ioppolo) Ways and Means Committee Committee Report Page Two 1988 CONTRACT - SEATTLE KING COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL Referred 2/1/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Finance Director to approve this contract to continue the same work plan proviled by the Economic Development Council the past few years. The fee of 3,536 is based upon a per capita rate of $0. 10. The Committee further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the agreement. NEW FIRE APPARATUS (Referred 2/8/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the recommendation of the Fire Chief and the Finance Director to fund the amount of $34,866 for the new 1500 GPM Class A fire pumper from excess revenue. ($34,866 is the diffe 'ence between low bid of $198,886 and $164,000 in the accumulative reserte account set aside for new equipment. ) APPRO!AL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 37603 through No. 33225 in the amount of $1, 312,217.65. The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 38226 through No. 33558 in the amount of $1,042,971.57. irb i Richa-d Stredicke, Chairman Robert Hughes Nancy Mathews CITY OFRENTONtd$ ® Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney m1 Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys February 4, 1988 TO: Maxine E. Motor , City Clerk FROM : Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Rezone Ordinance - Honey Creek Associates Dear Maxine: Enclosed please find the original of the revised Ordinance for the Honey Creek Associates Rezone. t(74/ 5: 17/117-1 LawrJ. Warren LJW:nd Encl . N8: 18: 38 CITY OF RENTON 1511111 r[11` 7 CLEAKCS OFFICE a Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 r t' l)rt;ary 1, 1988 Renton City Council Minute. Page 27 Audience comment was invited. Phillip Sheridan, 416 Shattuck Avenue South, Renton, questioned the date of rezone of his property to P-1, public use. Mr. Springer estimated that the P-1 classification had existed on the site for at least 20 years. Mr. Sheridan noted that although homes have been converted to office use, structures have retained residential appearance, and he requested that his property be rezoned to R-1. Carl Nordstrom, 409 Morris Avenue South, Renton, questioned whether his property is included in the rezone area, noting receipt of notification from the City regarding the public hearing. Mr. Springer confirmed that Mr. Nordstrom's property is not included in the rezone area. Discussion was held by Council members and staff regarding creation of non- conforming uses by rezoning the area to either B-1 or R-i due to mix of business and residential uses and transitional nature of the neighborhood. Concerns were also expressed regarding potential increase in property tax assessment for single family homes if zoning were changed to B-1, business. It was noted that if more than half of an existing residence in a B-1 zone were to be accidentally destroyed, it could not be rebuilt as a non- conforming single family home. Council members suggested that properties be zoned in accordance with existing uses. Upon inquiry regarding future rezones in this transitional area, Mr. Springer felt that the Hearing Examiner would be influenced by Council's action on the subject rezones; and he was of the opinion that rezoning the properties in compliance with existing use, either residential (R-1) or business (B-1), would not set a detrimental precedent. Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Hughes, Council close the public hearing. Motion failed. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL INSTRUCT STAFF TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS TO SIGNAL COUNCIL'S INTENT TO REZONE PROPERTY CURRENTLY USED FOR BUSINESS USE TO B-I AND TO REZONE PROPERTY CURRENTLY USED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE TO R-1 UNLESS PARTIES EXPRESS OPPOSITION AT PUBLIC HEARING OR SEND CORRESPONDENCE. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE #2, Bellevue, requested advancement to added PUD: Preliminary, Honey correspondence from City Attorney Warren regarding Honey Creek PUD. Creek, PPUD-015-84 MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE.* The letter discussed ambiguities raised by Mitch Murray, Honey Creek area resident at 2813 NE 23rd Place, regarding access to the proposal. The Public Works Director has indicated that a 40-foot right-of-way would be adequate to build travel lanes and associated street improvements; but Mr. Murray argues that Section 9-1108 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires a wider right-of- way, and Council required full street improvements as part of the PUD approval. In response to Mr. Murray's comments, City Attorney Warren is requesting clarification of Council's intent regarding improved width of NE 23rd Street; and whether cost estimates to improve Devil's Elbow road should be prepared to determine whether that roadway should be reopened and improved to provide access to the PUD in lieu of NE 23rd Street. *MOTION CARRIED. Advancemr nt to Old Mike Miller, Pacific Properties, 14410 Bel-Red Road, Bellevue, requested Business advancement to Planning and Development Committee report regarding Craftsman Homes appeal. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL ADVANCE TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT UNDER OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. Planning a Id Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented the Develonmeiiit Committee following report: Appeal: Craftsman Homes, Inc. Rezone, R-1. Craftsman Homes Inc. has requested approval of rezone from G-1, 039-87, Preliminary Plat, general, to R-1, single family residential, for 9.6 acres located on the PP-040-87 west side of Duvall Avenue NE between NE 17th and NE 21st Streets, 44-lot preliminary plat, and variances for two pipestem lots. 2. Craftsman Homes, Inc. appealed the Hearing Examiner's recommendation, dated 11/12/87, on this matter. For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING x:= xxasa x.=====_ SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Legal For Agenda Of February / , 1988 Meeting Date) Staff Contact awr nre ,T. Warren Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: N.E . 23rd and Honey Creek PUD Consent Public Hearing Correspondence xx Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Letter from City Attorney Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED:Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Refer to Planning and Development Other Clearance Committee FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Expenditure Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: r J f . SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. 16 . ,,;x CITY OF RENTON 2101,Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney IOW Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys January 27, 1988 TO: City Council Members FROM : Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: N.E . 23rd and Honey Creek PUD Dear Members of the Council : Several weeks ago the Council received a letter from Mike Hanis , representing Mitch Murray, concerning the City' s plans to widen N. E . 23rd , at the expense of Honey Creek Associates to satisfy the access requirements imposed by the Council on the development of the Honey Creek PUD. The Council referred that letter to the Administration. Mr . Houghton wrote the Council and indicated that the plan to obtain a forty foot right-of-way would be adequate to build the necessary travel lanes and associated street improvements. On the other hand , Mr . Murray argues that Table I of Ordinance Section 9- 1108 requires a wider right-of-way. He also states that the Council probably was told that forty feet of right-of-way was what was required . But, he notes, the Council as part of its PUD approval required that the full City street improvement be installed. Mr . Murray also argues that the City' s study of the Devil ' s Elbow road shows that the expense of bringing that road up to adequate condition would be no more than, and perhaps less than, the cost of improving N.E. 23rd to the required full street standards . There are clearly some ambiguities concerning the Council ' s decision and the City requirements. These can be stated as the following : 1 . Did the City Council wish more than a forty foot right-of-way to be put in? 2. Since the improved street width of N. E. 23rd west of the proposed widening is on forty feet of right-of-way, did the City Council wish the developer to do more in its section of the roadway than what exists in the continuation of that roadway? 3 . Is the City Council interested in having the estimated cost of the right-of-way and construction costs spent on Devil ' s City Council Membe January 27 , 1988 Page 2 Elbow road rather than N.E. 23rd . If so , is the Council prepared to change its statement in the Honey Creek Annexation that the Devil ' s Elbow road would not be reopened? 4. If the Council is interested in expending monies on Devil ' s Elbow road , does it wish updated costs for stabilizing the roadway and expanding the roadway to City standards? If the proposed roadway on N.E. 23rd is not up to City standards , then Devil ' s Elbow road surely is not up to City standards and would have to be substantially expanded . If the Council determines that a forty foot roadway was acceptable; then Mr . Murray has asked that the Council reopen the appeal time. As a passing comment, I would like to note that there is a difference between the right-of-way necessary to install street improvements and the right-of-way necessary to meet right-of-way requirements under Table I of Code Section 9-1108 . If the Council cannot quickly decide this issue , or if further input is necessary, then perhaps the issue could be re-examined by the Planning and Development Committee. If so , it would be appropriate for the City Council to tell the staff exactly what information would assist it in arriving at its decision. I have tried to set forth above some of the information that might be of assistance. it o,C Lawrence Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor John Hendrickson N8 . 17: 86 Mike Hanis For.Use By City Clerk's Office OnlyJA. I . # tLC •-{ AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING a aac aasaa as SUBMITTING V Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Policy Development For Agenda Of February 15, 1988 Staff Contact Carrie Trimnell Meeting Date) Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Honey Creek REzone Phase II Consent XX Public Hearing XX Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Letter Other B. Map C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Schedule for Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A Public Hearing for Marc 1988 Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The Policy Development Department requests that the City Council hold a public hearing to consider the imposition of G-1 general use zoning on the 8.73 acres of property which was added to the Honey Creek Annexation as required by the King County Boundary Review Board. The Policy Development Department requests that this hearing be scheduled for March, 1988.. 7t/ PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. 0 CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor February 15, 1988 The Honorable Earl Clymer, Mayor Members of the Renton City Council Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Honey Creek Rezone Phase II Dear Mayor and Council Members: The Policy Development Department requests that the City Council schedule a public hearing to consider the imposition of G-1 General Use zoning on the 8.73 acres of property added to the Honey Creek Annexation as required by theKingCountyBoundaryReviewBoard (please refer to the attached map) . The Department requests that this hearing be scheduled for March 7, 1988 . Sincerely, Larry M. Springer Policy evelopment Director sk3 hcl Attachment 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 r a''..,q, 4.::' 1 - • +,•• A, - j, ••N q I MI 4 . K L.,- 6112. OCr o Yid r • tIIE , . 4, 0- 1 4/ 7\,. I ti i ...no gawp as a a ill I• %I. 4, I 1 .• 9 — -_-iX . • u , 16 :._ . ti Zit,AV iv. .., ab. Amilp.,,,,, 7 I t4 N e1er f Gz a s WI. . i e ce '• 6 x 0 . a tup i • N7£J rt - • a atQ ©© dr AT gra"r .- ii v 10.... 2 Yr7 k 6 la ga pa a usilli! - pr lir" 6.6 ill I w \ • • • tlrv"d aAlle1111'- Illi ! • Eal Sol v..t 0//'. 7 f: 1fiHPti% t01MIORq eedsa III- 1111 Elan!O j •. a l+: Io K© m tv Or.-. KM Ir. ig,i., 01 4.us sea faiwirk, .1 aa , s- Is 1W i I Y • iihQVo1 it'Dt e 1 Ib il 5bis .7: t a OOQ rir r/av ,di` is :1iyefir `la.:.n/MIONmm© ter: r VIEMBICOL_ ll 1 n nm T.rtxs us a-ltani- 1 5 AM1(1M3Yu313 // / t I•t1°©r'n C I: I..I, 11,11 c.c•as5H011i1H13NdNtJ31S • , fi"•; x Gz 31v.O VG A-f tt Ilk," al J2E.z gni LC2 I 1 ea.fid iiIIt `.. r.. _ k , , 4• ft llWll All, n0.1. 3x5 - - O'x2 IZ k:24L71A. vov GIOv1 L•i 1 I I 1 1 o•t 4i t1W11 LW Ott C Zr 1 i 1 KC ovi I 11 i,; 1( ro• at16` 007 7t 17t+H vt 4 N V.4 ,,., ,•3 29i VIA L.• I • 1, i-- u!4 4'IiTYO v I e 1 Nod Li ili 6. LA.A.Atr) /LI t%11°8W r 6 Y= CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM f,,i(t/u.a..vL1 22-1 9e>e, To : T Y YIn C a.V tr t . AiV ae -AIL AvumixotA-1211 / AebtAke.At.f2,14.44_A levuott.. forY" 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 1 SPEED LETTER TO: DATE: 8c9 PROJECT: .SQ.•,,7 -d btr_, SUBJECT: L-2e A-( ,G•e- p,••.c_- u6,-(.,e-, Gam- S' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEpkRm EiiT CITY OF RENTOU Q J A N 2 2 1988 r, gnati-rjir22-------- -- HONL ;REEK REZONE phase I PARCEL A ..-2 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 83°06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence North 48°06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 34°58'05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence South 1°06'22" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 1F.H.3.12.AJH:mf 11/13/87 HONEY CREEK REZO.. . phase I PARCEL B G-1 zonir.y That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence North 1°06' 22" West a distance of 235.00 feet; Thence North 34°58'05" West a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence North 88°.15' 15" West a distance of 170.00 feet; Thence North 11 °06'22" West a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 46°06'22" West a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 185.29 feet to an intersection with the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North along said East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the South Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. and also known as Devils Elbow) ; Thence Southeasterly along said Right-of-Way Line to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northwest with a radius of 80.00 feet, and a center which bears North 38°15'25" East; Thence Easterly and Northerly along said curve an arc distance of 213.84 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of said 120th Place Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet and a center which bears North 65°06'50" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line an arc distance of 72.3 feet to the point of reverse curve, said curve being concave to the Southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; Thence Northwesterly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to a point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 feet; Page 1 of 2 Thence North 49°23' 20" West along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with radius of 60.0 feet and a center which bears North 40°36'40" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the West Line of the East 1111 .28 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence Northerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the Plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats, Page 93, records of King County, Washington; Thence South 88°15 '36" East a distance of 55.60 feet; Thence South 1 °16'00" West a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 24°14 '00" East a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence South 32°14'00" East a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 81°42'58" East a distance of 311. 13 feet; Thence North 57°15' 59" East a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 1°15'59" West a distance of 160.00 feet; Thence South 57°15'59" West a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 9°08'56" East a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15'59" West a distance of 114.74 feet; Thence North 88°19'25" West a distance of 448.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1F.3.21 .AJH:mf 01/18/88 Page 2 of 2 HONEY CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL C R-1 zoning That portion Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance of 1034.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 57'15' 59" West a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 81'42' 58" West a distance of 311. 13 feet; Thence North 32'14' 00" West a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 24'14 ' 00" West a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence North 1'16'00" East a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 88'15 '36" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 392.70 feet; Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 555.64 feet; Thence South 1'15' 59" West a distance of 480.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned Southwest Corner; Thence South 88' 1?' 25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15'59" East a distance of 114.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence North 9'08'56" West a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence North 57'15 ' 59" East a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 760.00 feet; to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 2 TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distai'ce of 630.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 0'53'38" East a distance of 538.25 feet; Thence South 46'06'22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 11'06'22" East a distance of 1405.00 feet; Thence North 88'15' 15" West a distance of 110.00 feet; Thence South 0'53'38" West a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 48'06'22" East a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence South 83'06'22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; Thence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet ; Thence North 88'19' 25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point or Beginning. Page 2 of 2 1F.H.3.11.AJH:mf 12/11/87 HONEYCREEK REZONE - Parcel D G-1 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 said point also being the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 01 °16' 12" East along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to an intersection with the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1490; Thence West along said South line to an intersection with the East line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 3401 a distance of 320.12 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing City of Renton limits a distance of 430 feet; Thence West and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1246 a distance of 320.81 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing limits of the City to an intersection with the South line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1622 a distance of 500 feet more or less; Thence East along said City limits a distance of 321 .6 feet more or less; Thence North and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence East along said North line to the Northeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 a distance of 322.20 feet and the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 1F.3.17.AJH:mf 12/11/87 i'• '''-l' !. 4-. t''' iL), o ICY . 1Jr 11%t7 timk • ..., . I e' t I t p •, M- I L. z •.., Villa iams ix n 0© 0 1 is , • n , r IIIIII 1 1 ' ••c • °AV " ?. " "). :•';,,,Tf t,'' go , ,, Dv, 1., -. ., „r„,„,0 10 ' P. lit '! , [t; ' ,, ,ii e Ø L k(oft1i., , 10011 1 0 x `` p 11 313 c r1.S.38 Dill l ' Ill 9 ' ... *' a11i, A„, . . 0 i.ri ch,,, 11.„,,-:,,,:- ,,•;•, A,,;f„.„:,.„-;,•,,...,,, 1%. .,„. a--: 1 1-.III rigem1 I n IIIj_ 1 iii..„ . ,_ , O sums g I -IS 1101163 alli t 1 a • k J, i S, .......:::.::::.:........ s i 4"" 1 t 44, 1 i S r me„ 4 r rr yeowiri it PI a 11 lot l., ., :) . : h if .1 Ii, 1 I, i. A Y + ' e S • t 1 I .• t 1 0. er 2i24La k{t "' ti Iw 1. ) li i . *I a 4 wA 9 : C e J< <l tl 1 tl 11411036IatOa' IV #. 74'; '-'• .> ,' i,,,--'00 ,, . ;, 6 1..c 14 1 / S i 1 rel L 1 J .-IF _ 1 1 47001 ka0 d 7/---" 1 0 as ov '' ' C T ya699L L ® tt r"a i1m r ii 0 c.• 1 s i.n. 7.. \(: tall' 1 L - 41744' 1 1 4 A I 1 1% 2 C e A. GI 3,, I, 1 ) 1r Y II b l fat , • n1 Y: { 1IWI1 ill Nt, .1.rv'B ni •• OZz n a fhb+t`.., Ail, .1,1 :10'" /.. ' r, -Pt n V 9t I 1 1 Z6% 1 J4 61G 1 01. 411 ooc C. I 2--- I \ 1.: I otac I I . Sv00 713ITd IOa p;. k u4 1 11:4.* L I 0,2244 ....1 e' I v ,.{. 1AOn II:1W w1.1 7OG 0 L G tut • clQ aik , , . • aCITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney soil Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys December 3 , 1987 TO: Renton City Council Members FROM : Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Honey Creek Associates and N. E. 23rd Dear Council Members: By recent City Council action, the Honey Creek annexation was expanded, at the demand of the King County Boundary Review Board and then the necessary legislation adopted. That action led to the adoption of the necessary rezone ordinances for the Honey Creek Associates property , thereby giving life to the Honey Creek PUD. You may recall that the Council authorized me to begin preliminary negotiations to acquire the necessary half street to fully develop N. E. 23rd. Development of N.E. 23rd was one of the conditions of the approval of the Honey Creek PUD. Does the Council now wish me to again pursue the acquisition of that property? It appears likely that a condemnation action will have to be filed. It has been the City' s position to this point that Honey Creek Associates will pay my fees, cost of any staff time, and any award that results from the condemnation action. Before beginning to aggressively pursue this condemnation, I wish Council authorization for my actions. I believe it should be clear , from the record, that the City intends to use its power of eminent domain to condemn this property before I take any affirmative steps to start a condemnation lawsuit. Of course, it will be necessary for the City to adopt an ordinance authorizing the condemnation, before I have the legal authority to proceed. I would be happy to prepare that ordinance if the Council so desires . I await your further direction. dr" La ,rence J. arren LJW:nd cc: Mayor N8.15: 24 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 HANIS & OLSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 MICHAEL M.HANIS 206)251-9313 GARY O.OLSON JAMES D.CAYCE,ASSOCIATED COUNSEL ANNETTE DELGA['DO,LEGAL ASSISTANT December 2, 1987 Pit Honorable Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 And To: Renton City Council fltc 2 Re: Honey Creek PPUD Dear Madam Mayor and Members of the Council : This office represents Mitch Murray and others regarding impacts to their neighborhood of the proposed Honey Creek PPUD. One of the specific concerns he has, as you are aware, is with regard to the access road that is to be installed along NE 23rd Street. The records indicate that a portion of Randy Corman' s property is to be condemned to provide a total right-of-way of forty feet for the improvements to NE 23rd Street. This would result in a forty foot right-of-way for NE 23rd Street from Edmonds Avenue NE to the PPUD development site. Mr. Murray' s concern is that forty feet is a substandard right-of-way per Renton Code, and that this will result in a substandard road carrying traffic from the Honey Creek development through his neighborhood to Edmonds Avenue NE. Mr. Murray would prefer that NE 23rd Street not be used at all as access to this development. He feels that the public would be better served if the money to be spent on condemning Mr . Corman ' s property and on improving NE 23rd Street was used to improve the Devil ' s Elbow roadway. The Devil ' s Elbow roadway could then be used for access to the development instead of NE 23rd Street, and it could also be used to provide the much needed east/west access across Honey Creek Valley. However, if NE 23rd Street will be used, it certainly should be improved to meet or exceed minimum City Code requirements from the PPUD site to Edmonds Avenue NE. In reviewing the records on this matter, there is some ambiguity with regard to the City Council ' s conditions for approval of the Honey Creek PPUD. In the minutes of April 14, 1986 , the PPUD was approved subject to the following: December 2 , 1987 Mayor Shinpoch & Renton City Council Page Two Dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue N . E . and the site , with an engineering report and specifications for full-street improvement as required by City Code;" (hilighting added) To get a total of forty feet of right-of-way , it is only necessary to dedicate twenty feet (not forty feet) , since there already exists a twenty foot dedication. However, it is clear that the administration interprets this to require a total right- of-way of forty feet, which would require a dedication of only twenty feet, the amount the City apparently intends to condemn on behalf of the developer. A bigger problem is with regard to the condition that the improvement be for a "full-street improvement as required by City rCode" . It is not possible to fit the full-street required by the City Code within forty feet . Section 9-1108 7 . H . establishes minimum widths for road improvements in subdivisions. It requires a sixty foot minimum right-of-way for neighborhood collectors . Neighborhood collectors are residential access streets that are longer than 800 feet. If a street is shorter than 800 feet , a fifty foot minimum right-of-way width is allowed. A forty foot minimum width of right-of-way is allowed only for one-way traffic in hillside areas, which is not the case here. NE 23rd Street will be over 1260 feet long. Section 4- 2709 1 . C . states that design requirements for planned unit developments shall be the same as requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. The Minimum Standards for road improvements also require five foot sidewalks and four foot planting strips on each side of the street. The minimum improved street width allowed for any use is thirty-two feet (residential access street less than 800 feet long with a fifty foot right-of-way) .The improved street width, plus the sidewalks, plus the planting strips , plus any bulkheads and/or guard rails, all must fit within the right-of- way. It is obvious that forty feet (not twenty feet) of additional right-of-way will need to be condemned and dedicated between Harrington Avenue NE and the site, or the Council ' s direction that NE 23rd Street be improved to specifications for full-street improvements as required by the City Code will not be December 2, 1987 Mayor Shinpoch & Renton City Council Page Three accomplished. Also, twenty feet of additional right-of-way will need to be obtained along NE 23rd Street between Edmonds Avenue NE and Harrington Avenue N.E. in order to provide sixty feet of right-of-way. By this letter we are requesting clarification of the city street improvement requirements for NE 23rd Street. For the record, my clients wish to make it clear that they oppose having a substandard roadway through their neighborhood which would be handling the volume of traffic to which this one will be subject. It will be through an area of young families with many children. At a minimum, that street has to have sidewalks on both sides for the children to walk on, and planting strips to provide some clearance between the sidewalks and roadway surface. Renton is now contemplating condemnation of an additional twenty feet of right-of-way, as opposed to the direction that forty feet would be dedicated. As mentioned above , there is already a twenty foot right-of-way there which, of course, does not require dedication. Prior to commencing that condemnation, this specific question should be resolved, and its answer will have a great impact on the neighborhood' s response to this PPUD. Due to the increasing public concern about this project , it is requested that this letter be placed upon the agenda of the next City Council meeting. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, HANIS & OLSO Michael M. Hanis MMH : jmc o r so si/ sr of w ` a s 002 o:> !j4L'0 k ', 66/ a a o osi os/ oo I ooi 1 oot d, .Q 0 p (+P 1 0 0 C L OL OL OL 01 OL od 0 OG v `o c 4 o o G 4G s8 oiZ M i E ;w Z II°lq G. 0 G 0 0 G. o 51. 4 4 e y/' / WM,1 WV oz. ap,-I co •,i/1 h 0 d0 od 0 v4OG 1? 0 nd o 0 •7 o _,iii c ro C i 1• YO 04 CIA M (n I : u G G XL OZ ; U 0 --({/V 1 0 °v: l P .1 w to I a -- 1, o :y' m a i 9 c c 5 0 wgan o0-rou Ie IQ a/VNi 7d ti ;_ j,° 901C 1 o`Co If r+i — mod_ _ — __ — L. MTo-*0 o ^ s rrr," Irf D-' OL DI 01 OL OL Ot 'a.-rs osoaouI OL 01, cbirt O 1/-i9! JIvf1S/Xa e.er tits AC'Or ofr4 aidesoa R-.ososoa' or ivaosoiox or-s/o.osoac O f-.'xososoat oa..orosoa oa-saosoresa 0 0O ov-s,oeocoroat hh ;' p s2 Z/ZO Z o,o1'' i5 a CJ G G to ss s so-oi-s/ S l 6BL9 6B8 c ybw l 1. ss LZ f zL 2L ZL 2 3 +I SJM6v B/ 88i 7 o 4 Del`^ or. a IO L - c L OB OB ZL ZL Z L /S L 44• A Q 6191 a p 0- : o p,c y2 9z CZ a l 0 N o w ZS o A qb ` o ' OE 0 G 1 O p 0800 (2. o0)°° 0400 00 00 yti" - 0 51 P toz t k c ti &pit Z I ob 66 w LZb ^' ll8- [jy60 6 o 46 0 gal 010C t G ''` 1 Oli to a bI o i 0 DIa a 0i2 , : D Yl 0 u 0 ti y4 ZQ2 jai . ono, `_ z . rLir 2} FA .rg` 9-7 i #" 4 A ZI t 01 a 6 g L 9 S •4 - o 4 £ o ,6' 62 n 8 terry k( 6 4 I 1 as aE t`, b n, m m g-gy h Z vyIo</o yto LZ vs 16£! S ZLFo oB6FOB p FS60/ 9£oA FsLgd t LLz• / f/ p 7S0ZL ZL 3::: 1% 10 c.:, QZ " VtM%/ 89N i //s•S/ Z£ O/fr0080 Sl J S lr ,:::::::(1 LOOg_` 0, 0 ? s6vvF c3,af xar / 7a ld Q?£Z •3N 9i 4: or/ '\ SIO g l° 10 ry.p£ Fci2 ^ ' 0 sLs OF6'f98/Z9 /ot ?Z z ooc= 08 \ o l ZOb£6 FL L xL ` S?iS , t y1L/-9/ BBI1 ,- ego: AO'' VL, £Z! 0 B4 6L j O g00ESL., tiv ` 0 , * Q 0? 0 . 0' O L 08Z006 00 Oi£ OGO L979F9 2 y28 b " 61 o OZ , IZ w ZZ Z w 0"^ ,, 20 , ` °'2 e p`,Qt ` o waEo Z' ycic 4cB1L A oa£ z tG Z ° D9Z LZ 9Z 4 6Z O£ ` o£ Z£ s 5£ I F 96Bo/ 9 9 79 q L6;2/ c Mt/rl/ BBiy a16 Q pob o g1$ Oba1L :tZi- Go !,.,.oBL t; 9F'lp y)6L S4 9 9 9 Z9 L9 cL 08 t i v• 06 -%f-c 6z'4 F'JL P'IL f i'L IF L v ca a[ isw0//O oZ/0 1I9 '9L!-5/- 9 6 Gf' Z V G L09-/e7L/•!/ B9 Y .. oE'ZL 4 co '/LR0O 1 b 16 1`j p 0z.f. 0£/0 ob/o O.: /0 O • Of/o ti O,10 pl `('" ooirc i;sc a Zc ° llp o4/ 0 o0ro ip too 01j0 to ` o 0 ww / • ZI b+ r 95ia4 b 'gL11L- COb D b1ZL, 0 Anil 0 0 I, Qb° G, d , V L b flys 80 °gill'001 w. 0LsIL b VAS t % 40L' Y vl sF fr 4 G v 1 e1 9/ Si a y-/ Fi N z/ 4 6 1. q Qbop * a`S NON P'tL a oe'1eL 4 of., . /o'cr s 7SN1aq/ 'fig Ii4' 6 ,"' o '+I------,- I-i z - 5... ds, sal - 3 t- MD yf'os ft Pi o rr! c rz M 0V i610 Z 'oil psi •SY •Pe X- I 1: Jt f Z 0800 .Z ea' F y o9p0 DID 00 L !" ; s 4 4 F of'2L 4 1 o[oc c, $ osoo ob of' a _L1 ie t yxss ' / ' Q 8 tib ` Z tip. oiozl'iou ot, e I otio i. j00 00 L. P 1 o v o i S/ p sl' a s 1 po pyo 04 We ,. 0 ti L ti 9 0 Si b r it 1 0 • !O ago Oj0 09, oZl' O41. re' T' ti y V C% ' is•rt 4 rc Z F.j[ psi-ri-Q s De D v I tj Is z,"...rug s-i:r/•BB 1- a or arc AiP• ! G e N ob k.`" Nz,- io > fe2 :/ S£'96 el M co's6/> 4-, Gar,. Ji/o,FJ w..,,,, 59)CD .9 - J34 Iil fop/ ick J/96.Q o. c. r I V O 1•Z 9 °slut 01.57.ri • A. ; 2 0.y NA k v4 0 41° 4 ry d M a D°r Y ° 0. 0'1 OZ°1 - f/) f0 p vs r. r W d'•.7! o0•S, oo•z7 0o iL ' ki' oo'o= i, \ ri. y. s/ . Iint, a ow- A. ' e' e_ r I c_J OO I bG1 .1 S pa Z ;:3'N' December 21, 1987 Renton City Council Mint,. . Pane 434 Procedure for Filling Council President-Elect Keolker presented a report recommending the Council Vacancy following procedure for filling the Council seat being vacated by Mayor- Elect Earl Clymer. Written and verbal applications will be accepted at a special Committee of the Whole meeting on 01/07/88 at 7:30 p.m. Each candidate will be allowed ten minutes to present their credentials to the Council and respond to questions by Council members. Balloting will be held at the next regular Council meeting on 01/11/88, and will continue at each subsequent Council meeting in January until one candidate receives a majority vote. If no majority is reached within 30 days of the declared vacancy, names of all nominated candidates will be forwarded to the Mayor. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT-ELECT KEOLKER WITH REGARD TO THE APPOINTMENT TO THE ANTICIPATED CITY COUNCIL VACANCY. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch and Councilmen Hughes and Clymer attended the meeting REPORT held by King County at Foster High School last week regarding garbage King County: Incineration incinerator siting. Approximately 500 people attended to express concerns Program with the review process, the choice of incineration as a solution prior to studying recycling, and the selection of specific locations. Due to political and public response, the King County Executive has subsequently determined that a non-urban site should be selected for location of an incineration facility and complete environmental review undertaken. PUD: Preliminary, Response from Public Works Director Houghton has been received regarding Honey Creek, NE 23rd and Harrington Avenue NE, proposed access to the Honey Creek PPUD-015-84 PUD. Width of the roadway is 40 feet with 28 feet required from curb to curb in which full improvement of two 14-foot lanes, curb and gutter, street lights, utilities and sidewalks will be provided. The proposed development will generate approximately 1220 trips per day which is under capacity for the roadway. Bellevue The City of Bellevue just completed a very lengthy citizen-council review of the structure of their government. They have concluded that the city manager system works very well for the city; however, they are considering electing a mayor to serve a four-year term instead of appointing a member of council to serve as mayor for a two-year period. Appreciation to Council Mayor Shinpoch indicated that it has been a profound honor to serve with City Council members, including Randall Rockhill, over the past eight years. She thanked Council for their dedication and individuality, and discussed numerous accomplishments which have been achieved. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, questioned whether Council PUD: Preliminary, Honey concurred in Mr. Houghton's memorandum regarding access to the Honey Creek, PPUD-015-84 Creek PUD. Mayor Shinpoch indicated that copies of the letter will be distributed to Council members for their review and response. Traffic Safety Councilman Stredicke questioned letter from Mayor Shinpoch regarding a Commission Traffic Safety Commission. Mayor Shinpoch referenced State law which requires the City to appoint a Traffic Safety Commission consisting of a police department representative, the traffic engineer and the city attorney to review proposed traffic revisions based on volumes, accident rates, and other warrants. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:15 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Marilyn Petersen 12/21/87 A CITY OF RENTON ail PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Richard C. Houghton, Director MEMORANDUM December 15, 1987 r..:-.,___ L it: ' ----- 46 I/ i trT TO: Barbara Shinpoch, Mayor t 6 _ ji' FROM: Richard C. Houghton, Public Workd Director SUBJECT: N.E. 23rd St. from Harrington Ave N.E. to Honey Creek Perk i P.U.D. The proposed roadway to serve Honey Creek Peig4e-ir P.U.D. has a right-of-way need of 40 feet. The improved cross section will be 28 feet face of curb to face curb vith a sidewalk placed next to the curb on the south side. This will provice two 14 foot lanes, curb and gutter, street lights, utilities, as needed and sidewalks. The proposed development generates about 1220 trips per day which, even assuming everyone uses the N.E. 23rd street would never get near the capacity of the roadway. In adcition to the 20 feet of ri -of-way a slope easement may be necessary. We do not have survey in ormation available to us to make this determation at this time. 7 Richard C. Houghton RCH:jv cc: ;ity Council 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569 bi • PV December 7. 1987 Renton City Council Minutes Page 411 Budget: 1988, City of Mayor Shinpoch thanked Finance Director Dan Clements and Budget Renton Supervisor Joan Pringle for their labors on the budget, and for a sentimental Continued last time, she congratulated the City Council for sterling, responsible action on a tough budget. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THE SUBJECT MATTER OF POLICY FOR MITIGATION FEES AND LIDS BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTP.,fi.TION WITH A REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION TO PROVIDE A MECHANISM FOR MEETING WITH THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY PRIOR TO THE TWO- YEAR SUNSET PERIOD WITH RECOMMENDATIONS ABOUT ITEMS THAT ARE BOTH TRANSPORTATION AND NON-TRANSPORTATION RELATED. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, THAT A RESOLUTION BE PREPARED THAT WILL ADDRESS THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY'S EXPRESS WISH THAT THE NEW SURCHARGE BE SPECIFICALLY DEDICATED TO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, AND THAT THIS BE PUT INTO RESOLUTION FORM AND BROUGHT BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke relayed a suggestion from a member of the audience that public hearings be held open until after Council comments. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, expressed disappointment in Citizen Comment: Webb - written presentation of the 1988 budget due to deletion of salary levels, and 1988 Budget requested that the information be reinstated for public review. He questioned purchase and expansion of the golf course and construction of the community center in view of proposed $82 million capital improvement program, which does not include plans to restore the central business district. Responding to Mr. Webb's comments regarding the mayor's salary, Mayor Shinpoch stated that by State law and actual practice, the position is full-time in Renton and part-time in Kent since Kent also employs a full-time city administrator. She also advised that the mayor's salary is being restored to the level it would have been had she chosen to take yearly cost-of-living increases. Councilwoman Mathews clarified that in addition to its part-time mayor and full-time city administrator, the City of Kent has also included a 11-time administrative assistant position in its 1988 budget. Advancement Requested Mike Hanis, attorney at law, 3900 East Valley Highway, Suite 203, Renton, requested advancement to his letter of correspondence. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE ITEM 8.A. CARRIED. Annexation: Honey Creek Letter from Michael M. Hanis, representing Mitch Murray and other neighbors in the Honey Creek annexation area, requested clarification of proposed access to the planned unit development site, and expressed preference for improvement of Devil's Elbow Road rather than NE 23rd Street for that purpose. The letter pointed out that although Council had required improvement of NE 23rd Street to full Code requirements, only 20 feet had been designated for condemnation which would result in development of a substandard 40-foot right of way. Mr. Hanis requested that if the City decides not to improve Devil's Elbow Road, that it require improvement of NE 23rd Street to Edmonds Avenue NE to full City standards, including sidewalks and planter strips. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ITEM TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ADMINISTRATION FOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL WHICH WOULD INCLUDE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTED PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL TO RESPOND TO THIS PROBLEM. CARRIED. Council asked that the matter be reviewed in a timely manner. Citizen Comment: Porter Les Porter, Sr., 1021 Olympia Avenue NE, Renton, questioned deadline fc, Good Shepherd Group expenditure of funds earmarked for Good Shepherd group home Home development. Councilwoman Mathews advised that block grant funds must be spent by the end of 1988, and general fund monies would require reappropriation to be continued beyond 1988. At Mr. Porter's request, it was MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE ITEM 8.D., petitions regarding Good Shepherd Group Homes. CARRIED. rv/& QL fs g.a • HAN IS & OLSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 MICHAEL M.HANIS 206)251.9313 GARY O.OLSON JAMES D.CAYCE,ASSOCIATED COUNSEL ANNE7TE DELGADO,LEGAL ASSISTANT December 2 , 1987 Honorable Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 And To: Renton City Council Re: Honey Creek PPUD Dear Madam Mayor and Members of the Council: This office represents Mitch Murray and others regarding impacts to their neighborhood of the proposed Honey Creek PPUD. One of the specific concerns he has , as you are aware, is with regard to the access road that is to be installed along NE 23rd Street. The records indicate that a portion of Randy Corman' s property is to be condemned to provide a total right-of-way of forty feet for the improvements to NE 23rd Street. This would result in a forty foot right-of-way for NE 23rd Street from Edmonds Avenue NE to the PPUD development site. Mr. Murray' s concern is that forty feet is a substandard right-of-way per Renton Code, and that this will result in a substandard road carrying traffic from the Honey Creek development through his neighborhood to Edmonds Avenue NE. Mr. Murray would prefer that NE 23rd Street not be used at all as access to this development. He feels that the public would be better served if the money to be spent on condemning Mr . Corman ' s property and on improving NE 23rd Street was used to improve the Devil ' s Elbow roadway. The Devil ' s Elbow roadway could then be used for access to the development instead of NE 23rd Street, and it could also be used to provide the much needed east/west access across Honey Creek Valley. However, if NE 23rd Street will be used, it certainly should be improved to meet or exceed minimum City Code requirements from the PPUD site to Edmonds Avenue NE. In reviewing the records on this matter, there is some ambiguity with regard to the City Council ' s conditions for approval of the Honey Creek PPUD. In the minutes of April 14, 1986, the PPUD was approved subject to the following: f December 2 , 1987 Mayor Shinpoch & Renton City Council Page Two Dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue N . E . and the site , with an engineering report and specifications for full-street improvement as required by City Code;" (hilighting added) To get a total of forty feet of right-of-way , it is only necessary to dedicate twenty feet (not forty feet) , since there already exists a twenty foot dedication. However, it is clear that the administration interprets this to require a total right- of-way of forty feet, which would require a dedication of only twenty feet, the amount the City apparently intends to condemn on behalf of the developer. A bigger problem is with regard to the condition that the improvement be for a "full-street improvement as required by City Code" . It is not possible to fit the full-street required by the City Code within forty feet . Section 9-1108 7 . H . establishes minimum widths for road improvements in subdivisions. It requires a sixty foot minimum right-of-way for neighborhood collectors . Neighborhood collectors are residential access streets that are longer than 800 feet. If a street is shorter than 800 feet , a fifty foot minimum right-of-way width is allowed. A forty foot minimum width of right-of-way is allowed only for one-way traffic in hillside areas, which is not the case here. NE 23rd Street will be over 1260 feet long. Section 4- 2709 1 . C . states that design requirements for planned unit developments shall be the same as requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. The Minimum Standards for road improvements also require five foot sidewalks and four foot planting strips on each side of the street. The minimum improved street width allowed for any use is thirty-two feet (residential access street less than 800 feet long with a fifty foot right-of-way) .The improved street width, plus the sidewalks, plus the planting strips , plus any bulkheads and/or guard rails, all must fit within the right-of- way. It is obvious that forty feet (not twenty feet) of additional right-of-way will need to be condemned and dedicated between Harrington Avenue NE and the site, or the Council ' s direction that NE 23rd Street be improved to specifications for full-street improvements as required by the City Code will not be December 2, 1987 Mayor Shinpoch & Renton City Council Page Three accomplished. Also, twenty feet of additional right-of-way will need to be obtained along NE 23rd Street between Edmonds Avenue NE and Harrington Avenue N.E. in order to provide sixty feet of right-of-way. By this letter we are requesting clarification of the city street improvement requirements for NE 23rd Street. For the record, my clients wish to make it clear that they oppose having a substandard roadway through their neighborhood which would be handling the volume of traffic to which this one will be subject. It will be through an area of young families with many children. At a minimum, that street has to have sidewalks on both sides for the children to walk on, and planting strips to provide some clearance between the sidewalks and roadway surface. Renton is now contemplating condemnation of an additional twenty feet of right-of-way, as opposed to the direction that forty feet would be dedicated. As mentioned above , there is already a twenty foot right-of-way there which, of course, does not require dedication. Prior to commencing that condemnation, this specific question should be resolved, and its answer will have a great impact on the neighborhood' s response to this PPUD. Due to the increasing public concern about this project , it is requested that this letter be placed upon the agenda of the next City Council meeting. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, HANIS & OLSO Michael M. Hanis MMH : jmc ova, .sue s . .r• -- ,>.. : 0, 77,::: Oc ccIInr- yl1 s s` i/ I , os i os/ o0rt2O n' Z `— 4. OL Ot OL oL 00/00 0 11 t V't 0 7.:111...... ' • ., It 14 7 i) oo, es CD S Ili p it Z w i. 0 0 o p fi a L.,03),of 1 0 WarifileirnwhZ4 \00 I V.V" /:.L! y v 60 e, rr w - I OV 9 9 vt r- t MLii I 1 C4 e‘ k r ci asl q ii a• _ 4 i I °fi0/ 9OOc 4 401c f1 re 0, C IF r li.... 4... .-- ll— — 41 — — / 1_ _ tillig. OkYfvtJ1 O` S RG IN,/ / J fTIoTi- O,tOt CZ OL OL OL Ot O/ c r,i0so,os OL a/z7 (/9 n n,n/ [/h ,es 'sI OIIA Ao si ero• R 4 dies ofo,< ar a:eososohI • R 8/Or O J 4 0• ocofefi aos.,o.„.", o os,- 0saeiofo, ouO AI-f tOsoOolt O ,r(VVd s7 Z/1i'2 c 0 -+ r 0f ,,, _S Q t .O?-07L060101E J 6BlP SS 1\ LZ zt ZLZL 23N r/JM60 B8BY 6BLe 41 7 c a r'w o;.B o L7 . 01171.. o L'•,"- F L 08 06 z ZL a[ + is[f c m TG7;C ( S7 SZ eI. ry r6 0V62gc: 00 00 4 n ti k 0 0w fl 2qb Cho oB h G o o CC r i/ 91 N o 5I ;2Z8 a o. t 13443 ti pf2°4 0 lS p j6' w ; I1Zb ` 1qg! , O4yb C10 r oty446 I 2 t\ GZ ` \ It ON2111 bl U O` c £I r v` 9 S r` v u 62 t ° 1C Ui Y c V I i ft r 3j OS aE/' 49- 7 In41, Ol 6 7 vhVZv i 11411k110 a `w o ro s}, W Lzss 141: s>< zt Fo oB 0f• oBLL i ' 11 N44 Fs6o/ fr14IA Fs' zL 8f zy 4-cs lb zoa a a zs oic ovB s az s -L,b Af7 s ct b 11Mi 'J.v,J amiss/ oaB= a zF o. Oj` 6 4-4-- id Oa£Z .3.N 901 ?coal Aof Icor / Z? lac, 7 6t1. u- os/ l40 Of art PS is I fb f B'zf Jo;9 rl?9 ace_y292/s NL/ IBN c el '. 4• lo4 r 00?0 4£ 4114i- v Q411L\ OS?0 , of 0 . tom,4/ L' 0 p970 0670 O FG` O!£0 OZGC rL 1 0 l iv Ali ZIT', 0. `,a o,y2al 061 t < OZ m , IZ i ' ZZ ' £Z44 0 i . . - . 70 o ; (3 ,` ZL o ; 001 , ez " 6Z - 02 , . 1£ w i, ` Aso o , ar a k. occo 1.. 0VL£ L Z Q B k 6. a££ ZL 0 v t µZ 9Z r m rZy 0L Z V £ r ci£ to.,-;',9ceo; air z L6iz/ tirci BeJy 4 bn 4 9 t• pcb 04gIL Ob° 1L * D ztt pDL th +I 6t f l, 79 L f cL OB 064-ee!a SC sr tl F is -•&r re ' zt t s•r xi r r. r,of 1 i5c0l-./[/•!i•Bs 1r of JL is of v. c441. IiN\ n 0010 O OPc 02) C A'tos -'t/•J/- 9, a r3 C' t` 4: 4, aMri ptOz= rCep![ v O r sc ! t O t79 OjOOtt C r( I° 0110 101. ? ge°•w1 tl i r i 0 1 ' c Osc y gcrzc b tlblt 1 prssl V Ecc/1 10 octi1- V Octt" 1s p6ttt b 04 ,{ 001- 1\ I y, 4 d 1 i li B! 0 9/ `prOSi f/ V Z/ v // v a e 06 t io . L c Ir-I 1 e N 0 ^ v h ter. } I O g6Cp ' r i tt o1 of 'GL 0, of"?, r /o VIPVa \ q' OIZ6 S N I-V o I`lshlaol - 7r 40: 3‘ 4 4g )1 k re• e,' " i, a r:i M• a, OOZ610 z . o/! n N7 ins'/ Ss oP T1C10 / c I s• i G `, 09 0 rj. !? 1 o f 'rL r f r Zt e odd .+ oLoby 8 osocoboc { oE A( `ti' c Lbis11"°1 Z pi0i 011 apt- 1I01pa Q AL 1. C Gb:` 00 Q • ',- d`/ 8 A 9 G° 1 S 0 6 .I, 0 s e o o= v s tr o o=` ow ago , ` ` ` 6C th i' de f iO f c Z 'l[ j i s r. /fr. T 1 "oE ' zc ti• ; k i l sr•si•sv r oryrc .vv r 1 0 Z.,,,w s f i---- may. B 5,,• d yx ZL •at. 1 r 61 /!/iL 96 zl M 0° 6 r l <.c 0 se/ r J csf y [oc fJ t ,ot C T it os• r t IA 2,,\ c\QL b,a 6 / 3. iy66 Z I q i : O s;' v wo•Z?-. oseres' A;.sJ.s, a^'...0 t o or .1 ` sk kg) uit : 46 ea°gg ! 04:40,0, et: 0' 2.1 4:"' 0? 0,:,di 11 co lilt •o•l, oo•Zs 0 v r li z oo lL, oo' o zf s Q-- - 1— _ o J Kf' 1f- r i .fIn et Z Z V p te•IL, 1 • RENT IF ZONING DEP riENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO -1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : - n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 21 BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 77 n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 7) 1-Th O 44-* > Key` D 8 iJ S c / J e/C i7 TGe C'f-/L1 2 A 1) 3 c !L J DATE: 7,1ySIGNATUREOFDIRORAUTHORZEDREPRESENTATIVE CERTiFICAT_ 1 Lu-'',%Lr undersigned. Maxine E. Motor Clerk of the CX4cl of Renton; Washington, certi y that this is a ,,a-, L. c correct copy of Ordinance No. 4095 Subscribed and Sealed this 17th ' y of Novemb 87 City Clerk R` CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 131 -1E= ii ORDINANCE NO. 4095 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF, RENTON HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES A-1-84 ) rq WHEREAS under the provisions of RCW 35A. 14 . 120, as amended , a petition in writing requesting that certain r4 territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described r4 11.4 below , be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and r. JD filed with the City, and WHEREAS prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, and as more particularly specified in RCW 35 . 13 . 125 and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to assume the pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City' s Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable zoning code relating thereto, and WHEREAS the Policy Development Department has examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexations and determined the assessed valuation of all the properties, the same being in excess of seventy-five percent (75%) of the area to be annexed , in value, as provided by law and the petition also setting forth the legal description of the P ORDINANCE NO. 4095 property according to government legal subdivision or plat and the Policy Development Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Renton, and WHEREAS the City Council fixed May 12 , 1986 at 8 : 00 P.M. as the time and place for public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by 4 law, and OWHEREAS pursuant to said notice a public hearing has been held at the time and place specified in the notice and r4 the Council having considered all matters in connection with Q7 the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation as specified in RCW 35.13.130 et seq have been complied with, and WHEREAS, a "Notice of Intention" having been filed with the King County Boundary Review Board as required by law, and the Boundary Review Board having exercised its jurisdiction and having determined that the boundaries of the annexation need to be expanded and the City Council having concurred with the expansion of the boundaries of this annexation by Council motion on October 19, 1987, NOW THEREFORE , THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The findings , recitals and determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects; all 2- ORDINANCE NO. 4095 requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method , including the provisions of RCW 35 . 13 .125, 130 , 140 , 150 and Chapter 189, Session Laws of 1967, have been complied with. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the City Limits of the City of Renton, is hereby annexed .to the City of Renton and such annexation to r4 be effective on and after the approval , passage and publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date JOthe property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton r and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and JD JD thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Area in vicinity of Devil' s Elbow Road aka NE 27th) and the owners-petitioners of the property shall assume the pre-existing bonded indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35 . 13 . 126 as it pertains to the property, and the property to be subject to the City' s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council , State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. 3- ORDINANCE NO. 4095 SECTION III : The annexed property, contiguous to Precinct No. 11-15 of the City of Renton shall be and constitute a part of the Precinct No. 11-15 of said City. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 16th day of November, 1987. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 16th day of November, 1987 . 1.4 V, Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor r Ga Approved as to form: w4 1.0 r4 Lawrence J. Warr City Attorney JD Date of Publication: November 20 , 1987 CITY3 :44/10/26/87 t c T 4- ORDINANCE NO . 4095 HONEYCREEK ANNEXATION Exhibit "A" That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4: Thence Northerly along the Westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4whichisalsotheexistingCityLimitsoftheCityofRentonasannexedunder Ordinance No. 1796 to the North line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence East along said line 1/4 to its intersection with the West margin of Thence Southerly along said West margin to its intersection with the South line of the North 30 feet of said Northwest 1/4: 1.4 Thence Easterly along said South line to its intersection with the Northerly Pft extension of the West line of the Plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in p Volume 95 of Plats, page 93, records of King County, Washington; JO 4 Thence South along said extension and West line to the Southwest corner of the 4 Plat of Paradise Estates; GO IO Thence Easterly along the South line of Paradise Estates to the West lineoftheEast555.64 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; thence Southerly along said West line a distance of 392.70 feet; thence Easterly 555.64 feet to the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; thence Southerly along said East line and the East line of the Southwest 1/4totheSouthlineoftheNortheast1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4, said South line also being the City Limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1490; Thence Westerly along said South line a distance of 320.12 feet to tthethence Easterly line of that tract of land annexed under Ordinance No. Northerly along said City Limit line a distance of 430.00 feet; thence Westerly along said City Limits line a distance of 320.81 feet to the Easterly line of that tract of land annexed under Ordinance No. 1246; thence Northerly along said City Limits line a distance of 500.00 feet to the South line of that tract of land annexed under Ordinance No. 1622; Thence Easterly along said City Limits a distance of 321.6 feet; thence Northerly along the City Limits to the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of said ection 4; thence Westerly along said North line and the City limits linetotheSoutheastcorneroftheSouthwest1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 and the Point of Beginning. 2ECEllyErn FEB 5 1987 HHINGTOMSSr, EV STATE 1E? 80AR0 BOUNDARY FOR XING CO. ild 1 e „ n ,T ORDINANCE NO. 4095 e 77 1;c‘ ".- i 44 sr.7 G6 !72 3T JN , / 11 373 7i I 1 1‘ i i 1 11 uE 3•b S7.S.E. 71• I a/ 4 ' 0 I.o11 i I 374 N1 376 - 362 361 Ni- i.+ r5" 347 S7I C... D. 1-4 i L L..ivi A I'i......:...J. 1....:.:..;.,,1-.... ..., s'...--:\ 7.::: i i •-• :.'.1 t ,...)is..., /:..:,.-: Ii...:!. L.,r:. i 4+0 t 0. YlL 1 , ill, 0 V I PAR 361 1 PACIFIC CCA5' 366 3611 1 370 367 03} 360 I L2 3» 1 II 397 h4o 404 ,to6 09 M 2`11 Z 36 .221 Z 20 2.03 1 I 1 y(rV bT. 1 I 21y 11111101r 1 I 7 i4..7 I 1 241 237 zzz I 4e1 ua Ni/1a 1 w ® 4\ 94. nE1k11il!1r4 { 4.. l.l., r6 },© 1 j , SIERRA HEIGHTS KENNY- si I Win Old Aevoe.coevec,r V1 i ELEMEUTARY SCHOOL rs L DALE Z 2 23 203 0,' v mL©e ± t ; PARK c_. oo,a T. e,1 5 ate' , ,JIfil5T. Mgr 1,lir anelgtS . 4 , i!! •''''''4171V : I -' WirtrillW0,-- tritig0,2, 1.. .r:.. ., ‘,:.1,-.. OMER, o o 4 l I S I• ;• r ' 1 ..,, R Q A ``` e 11,. aoa Quo m .o Ir o I 1•tGt1I• A ,,. sst ,0 3 & Im©Q. i 7 _at-' I I I ems+. ' z gIttil''' I » > ' II : i l 11A , r N/711hitiaA O i• , 5-~ - • 1 I 4 IAA n. inns ..1.I 11 Q`! j' j3 ji > 11 0>0 um .I: 5' its SA :.1 fg tie-;. -.:, I, In d P . ' •v i JI O p" 1 ' VC 01.2. 1. ...moo 1111'.:2'sou' ‘.7741101305141, 4' 40 fics: ii agbr11i l o e0- C w o°°A S a r.I`._ Mifihe m111A[' 0 0 • a ••:• NORTH ' I.L h 1,' * t 1--' - •s7' r. 5 C! o, II s iWtleA YVal i 1, 1 7- I. fry 1 Oka 1 h< IM ie e riplu,. i19 0 244 231 228 21 s E Isom iii • ' I McKN1UHT r IIJRdIGHyy " 11..._. vi ::. r I` c-. D © Ienlk zlerdd hf 1 ® r • Izg 1 000 ©° 1 tM Z4T LDO•_L9 C - U1 ' '• z w s S 1 1 - m d V ; Mt ." 7.-1- ENV- 1 3= 1.-Q.. ' i aE-- liiiiiggal i !i7 loors r 0.. srCap'Y 4 1 xi= 1:3- f I d* 24 el, z.1 IP i ' i =.s' m and o 6' ¢ 39 7 Ii c.i 3! c 0d i- CtC aid5m l1lO !1H!! M v4 De= es' 1 neaioao sAa tat e Z A October 19. 1987 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 331 Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Development Committee recommending acceptance of the Honey Creek Annexation as modified by the Minority Report King County Boundary Review Board. The report stated that any annexation Annexation: Honey Creek that the City accepts should allow logical extension of services and be cost- effective. In this case, the annexation as revised would include Devil's Elbow Road which will require repairs estimated at hundreds of thousands of it- 6 -8 7 dollars. Chairman Stredicke stated his opinion that because of excessive burden on City tax dollars, this annexation is not reasonable, and should be corrected by County tax funds prior to being approved. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE MAJORITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, AND DIRECT STAFF TO NEGOTIATE WITH KING COUNTY FOR AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN AN EAST-WEST ROADWAY BASED ON TRAFFIC USE.* PUD: Preliminary, Honey Letter from Honey Creek PUD applicant Bob Tomberg was read confirming Creek, PPUD-OT5-84 voluntary agreement that the time limits currently in effect for submittal of a final plan for a PUD (Section 4-2711(6)(A) of City Code) shall be applicable to the Honey Creek PUD. The section requires that the applicant submit the final development plan within two years of the effective date of the Council action to approve the preliminary plan, subject to one-year extension by the Hearing Examiner. The letter stated that said agreement is predicated on the fact that the time taken by the city to condemn a portion of NE 23rd Street (Corman parcel) will not apply to the time limit. Upon acquisition by the City of that parcel, the two year "clock" will resume, and the two year time limit will be cumulative, not consecutive. Mr. Tomberg's letter concluded by requesting that the City confirm the agreement in writing. Council discussion clarified the intent of the majority report that the annexation would be accepted without opening Devil's Elbow Road within the City limits due to high cost of repair; that access for the PUD development is not required via Devil's Elbow Road; at sometime in the future an east-west corridor must be provided for that area; that the portion of Devil's Elbow Road located in King County is open for access; and the Boundary Review Board conditioned approval of the annexation upon inclusion of Devil's Elbow Road, and imposed a condition that if the annexation is modified to delete the road, reapplication for annexation must be delayed for one year. Councilman Reed concurred in Councilwoman Mathews' request that the motion include a directive for staff to initiate negotiations with King County for an interlocal agreement with the City of Renton for participation in an east-west roadway which would reflect equal funding contributions based on traffic use. Upon inquiry, City Attorney Warren advised that the condemnation proceedings would be at the developer's expense. *ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, KEOLKER, CLYMER. 2 NAYS: STREDICKE, HUGHES. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Larson Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue South, Renton, President, Renton Hill Grant Avenue and 7th Association, reported a series of accidents at 7th and Grant; and circulated Traffic Problem seven photographs to illustrate sight-distance problems at the intersection. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION TO REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Larson On a personal matter, Mrs. Larson objected to change in utility billing system Utility Bills to monthly basis. She noted difficulty in budgeting for monthly bills when meters are read bimonthly, and suggested that meters either be read each month for actual water consumption or water useage estimated on the alternate months to equalize monthly payments. Discussion was held by Council regarding other billing options, including implementing budget program similar to those offered by gas and power companies. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT OCTOBER 19, 1987 HONEY CREEK ANNEXATION ISSUE PAPER (Referred 8/17/87) The Planning and Development Committee recommends that the Renton City Council accEpt the Honey Creek Annexation as modified at public hearing by the King Courty Boundary Review Board. GivEn the Council ' s long-standing concerns in regards to the timing of planned unit development, it is the Committee' s understanding that the proponent of the Honey Creek Annexation and Planned Unit Development has voluntarily agreed to impose upon his development the time limitations set forth in the City' s new Planned Unit Development Ordinance (Chapter 27 of Title IV of the Renton City Code) . Jdhr Reed, Vice-Chairman c. „,tie 6,y,,,,,,,„_, Kathy Kejker 040n RECEIVED OCT 19 1987 October 13, 1987 CITY OF hENIUN CITY COUNCIL gaRentonCityCouncilEggCityofRenton187200MillAvenueSouthOCT191J Renton, Washington 98055 KELEUGGWARREN RE: Honey Creek PUD (PPUD-015-84) By This letter will confirm that the applicant with regard to the above referenced matter, Honey Creek Associates, agrees voluntarily that the time limitscurrentlyineffectforsubmittalofafinalplanforaPUD (Section 4-2711(6)(A), Renton City Code) shall be applicable to the Honey Creek PUD. The aforementioned section requires that the applicant submit the final development plan to the City within two (2) years of the effective date of theCityCouncilactiontoapprovethepreliminaryplan, subject to the potential for a one year extension at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. This understanding is predicated on the fact that the time taken by theCitytocondemnaportionofN.E. 23rd St., regarding the Corman parcel, will not apply to the two year time limit on the submission of the final PUD plan. In other words, the "clock" will not run on the final plan requirement while the City is condemning that portion of the Corman property necessary to complete the City desiredfortyfootright-of-way. Upon the City acquiring the use and possession of the needed N.E. 23rd St. right-of-way from the Cormans, the two year "clock" will again begin to run. Therefore, the two year time limit will be a cumulative time limit and will not necessarily run on a consecutive basis. If this understanding is consistent with that of the Council and the City administration, please confirm this fact in writing in order that there will not be a misunderstanding in the future. Thank you again for your patience and cooperation in considering this PUD. Very truly yours, Honey Creek Asso lutes by Bob Tomberg BT:st 9-053/JLH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINORITY COMMITTEE REPORT OCTOBER 19, 1987 HONI:Y CREEK ANNEXATION ISSUE PAPER (Referred 8/17/87) The Planning and Development Committee is recommending acceptance of the Honey Creek Annexation as modified by the King County Boundary Review Board. Any annexation that the City accepts should be a logical extension of City services and a cost-effective annexation. In this case, the annexation, as revised, would include the Devil ' s Elbow Road which City staff has estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix. I do not feel it is a reasonable annexation because of this excessive burden on City tax dollars which should be corrected by County tax dollars before annexation. 1 e.e Richard Stredicke, Chairman 040! L I . - Pu- - ors- October 19, 1987 Renton City Council Minutes Page 330 Audience comment was invited. Clyde Cherberg, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, reported that in response to concern over protection of ground water sources, Boeing has removed 48 separate tank systems from the Renton plant alone and replaced them with above-ground systems. In addition, a program has been established to upgrade the remaining 17 tanks. While he supported the goal of the proposed ordinance, he felt refinements are needed to clarify specific sections and consideration given to the administrative burden the ordinance will place on both the City and tank owners. Mr. Cherberg requested specific definition of uses excluded from regulations; clarification of requirement to upgrade existing facility if a loss of product occurs; establishment of criteria to determine whether a release has occurred when underground storage tanks are closed; and he questioned whether consideration has been given to the substantial administrative burden placed on many tank owners and the City to implement and enforce new regulations. Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Cherberg reported that of the 17 remaining tanks at the Renton plant, most will be removed eventually, and those remaining will contain petroleum products. He agreed to supply a map designating location of the tanks to the City upon request. Darrell Robinson, 160 Water View Way, Folsom, California, engineer for Shell Oil Company and member of Western Oil and Gas Association's Northwest Fuel Storage Committee, requested reorganization of ordinance sections to separate requirements for membrane liners and double wall tanks; clarification of sections pertaining to frequency of inspections by a registered corrosion engineer; consideration of other methods of testing annular space on double wall tanks besides via pressure or vacuum; consideration of other options for overflow protection system; clarification of definition of "special accessories"; questioned upgrading entire existing system to new installation requirements in the event of a loss of product; suggested use of automatic tank gaugers and electronic line monitor/alarms to detect leaks and eliminate need for soil sampling/analysis and ground water sampling; questioned whether fee schedule has been established; and pointed out potential conflict between time periods for permit renewal process and inspections by Fire Marshal. Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Robinson stated that Shell has only one station in Renton in the Kennydale area, and the storage facility in the Valley is not state of the art. Dennis Lensegrav, Manager of Puget Power, 620 South Grady Way, Renton, indicated that Puget Power serves portions of nine counties in Washington and the company is concerned with meeting Federal, State and local requirements. He requested that Puget Power be involved in the review process for ordinance formation. Upon Council inquiry, Fire Marshal Gordon explained options for containment including membrane liner; relayed information from the Department of Ecology (DOE) regarding recent leak at Mobil tank farm; and advised that DOE does not anticipate State legislation to monitor underground storage tanks for approximately three to five years. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. RECESS MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:55 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:02 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. AUDIENCE COMMENT Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE, Suite 2, Bellevue, requested advancement to Advancement Requested Planning and Development Committee report regarding Honey Creek Annexation Issue Paper. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Vice-Chairman Reed presented a Development Committee report recommending acceptance of the Honey Creek Annexation as modified Majority Report at public hearing held by the King County Boundary Review Board. Given Annexation: Honey Creek the Council's long-standing concerns regarding timing of the PUD, the applicant has voluntarily agreed to impose time limitations upon the development as set forth in Chapter 27 of Title IV of City Code, Planned Unit Development Ordinance. 9 Qctober 13. 1986 Renton CitY Council Minutes Pane 4 NEW BUSINESS Council President Mathews announced requests from Seventh District Legislative Representative Don Davidson, the Association of Washington Cities, Suburban Recommendations Cities Association, and South Suburban Cities Legislative Committee for City recommendations on legislation proposed to the 1987 Legislature, and mentioned pending legislation regarding street ends abutting body of water, sent for Senator Garrett's sponsorship. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, LEGISLATIVE ITEMS BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR RECOMMENDATION BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Mayor Shinpoch reported conversation with Senator Garrett indicating Street Ends Bill had been endorsed by the Association of Washington Cities and would be presented to the Association of Washington Counties this week. Spill Correspondence Public Safety Committee Chairman Reed requested he receive copies of all correspondence received or sent regarding the petroleum spill matter discussed earlier by Fire Chief Wheeler. Honey Creek Councilman Stredicke questioned participation by the City Attorney in Honey Associates Creek Associates condemnation procedures. City Attorney Warren responded Annexation, A-01-84 that, at Council direction, efforts to further negotiations on this matter were Rezone R-014-84 and not to be at city expense. Agreement was reached between property owners PPUD-Q15-84 and the City Attorney's office for assistance in initial negotiations; report back to Council would occur after pending response from property owners. Parkland Addition Councilman Stredicke inquired regarding status of Parkland property addition to the Maplewood Golf Course. Administrative Assistant Parness responded the County Council has taken action on this matter, and it will be presented to Council after completion of County process. It was indicated this property had been purchased with Forward Thrust funds, restricting charging of lower fees to city residents. Councilman Stredicke requested copies of materials supporting this restriction. ADMINISTRATIVE In response to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry, Mayor Shinpoch reported that, REPORT in October, 1985, Council directed all airport leases be charged at 14e per Airport Leases square foot, a common renewal date of 5/31/90 be established, and these directives apply to all tenants (Boeing Company excepted due to fire protection provided). Renton Village Place Mayor Shinpoch reported the Renton Village Place pipe upsizing to 24" was budgeted as part of the 1986 Budget. Stilwill Sewer Mayor Shinpoch explained variation between estimate of $3,400 and $13,000 Connection actual cost of connecting to City sewer system for the Stilwill family was due to original estimate being predicated on two factors: 1) More shallow depth of connecting pipe, and 2) Ability to connect during construction of the Union Avenue project. Victoria Hills FPUD Council President Mathews indicated the Victoria Hills Final Planned Unit 042-85, Phase II Development would be discussed at next Monday's Council meeting, a reminder to Council and interested parties. AUDIENCE COMMENT Robert Miller, 8218 South 124th Street, Seattle, indicated area involving Bryn Bryn Mawr Water Mawr area water customers recently transferred to City water has been served Service by only two water districts - Bryn Mawr Water District, formed in 1907, and Water District #14, which replaced it in 1924, although water may have been wholesaled to them from other districts. Unaware of a designated franchise area, Mr. Miller questioned whether all homes transferred were within that area and if franchising would involve water or only street usage. Mr. Miller stated pressure charts indicating 25 pounds of pressure had been taken at the fireplug on the City main, and did not guarantee consistent pressure at that level. Utilities Committee Chairman Clymer stated this matter was still in committee and would be on the agenda again at next week's meeting. EXECUTIVE MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SESSION CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION ISSUES AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION. CARRIED. Time: 9:50 p.m. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 11:11 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk September 8. 1986 Renton City Council Mint._ Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE Letter from John L. Hendrickson, attorney for Honey Creek Associates, Honey Creek requested assistance by the City Council in meeting right-of-way Associates Rezone condition imposed on Honey Creek Associates Rezone, R-014-84, and PPUD Preliminary Planned Unit Development, PPUD-015-84, approved Conditions 4/14/86. (Rezone ordinance held awaiting approval of concurrent annexation by King County Boundary Review Board.) The letter noted difficulties incurred by applicant in acquiring right-of-way from owner at 2216 Harrington Place NE to enable construction of full 40-foot road aligned with NE 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue NE and the applicant's property. The administrative staff, including the City Attorney, was requested to initiate condemnation proceedings, if necessary, with the understanding that the City would be reimbursed for all costs. City Attorney Warren reported that although the matter had been discussed in Committee, the requirement for full-width right-of-way had been approved by the Council without clarification of whether the City would aid in condemnation procedures, if determined necessary. He noted that if the Council wishes to concur in the applicant's request, the City would have to determine whether or not the amount requested is unreasonable before it would assist in the matter, and an agreement reached for reimbursement of attorney's fees to ensure that the City is not expending public funds to aid a developer. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PROVIDE PRELIMINARY ASSISTANCE AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL IF FURTHER COUNCIL ACTION IS REQUIRED. City Attorney Warren clarified that he would obtain square footage calculations to determine appropriate value, discuss attorney's fees with Mr. Hendrickson, and then report back to Council before any further action is taken. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested his "no" vote be recorded, noting that if applicant cannot meet required conditions, he should resubmit plans. Finance City Clerk/Finance Department requested the City Council to declare Department:certain City equipment surplus (obsolete, damaged or no longer used) to Surplus allow disposal at public auction to be held October 4, 1986, by the City Equipment of Bellevue for the annual Joint Government Disposal Auction. Upon Auction inquiry, Administrative Assistant Parness reported that obsolete IBM personal computer keyboards are being surplused because they are incompatible with the City's data processing system. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL DECLARE LISTED ITEMS SURPLUS. CARRIED. Rivoli Estate Quit Letter from Robert L. Anderson, attorney for the Estate of William O. Claim Deed Rivoli, requested City officials to execute Quit Claim Deed to remove City of Renton's cloud on the title to Lot 19 in Block 5 of the Renton Real Estate Company's First Addition to Renton, allegedly purchased from the City by Moreno and Adina Rivoli in 1935 although the deed cannot be located. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND ADMINISTRATION TO REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. Following further explanation by City Attorney Warren that the property had come into the City's hands through an LID foreclosure in 1934 and was purchased in 1935 by the owners who have occupied and paid taxes on Lot 19 for 51 years, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN QUIT CLAIM DEED ON THE PROPERTY. CARRIED. Padgett Waiver Letter from King County residents Alan and Angela Padgett, 13304 SE Request for Sewer 99th Street, Renton, requested waiver of requirements of Resolution No. Connection 2162, adopted in February of 1978, which prohibits sewer connection by residents outside the City limits unless specific conditions are met. The letter noted participation by the Padgetts in LID 295, 1975 sewer project in Union Avenue NE north of the City limits of Renton, to assure future approval of connection by the City. Mr. Padgett advised that King County recently denied his short plat request due to unavailability of letter from the City authorizing future sewer hookups. He noted that prior to his participation in LID 295, he had an approved septic system, but he joined the project to assure future connection to City sewers when he subdivided his property. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Council President Mathews requested notification of all committee meetings regarding this matter. OF R4 ,1 o THE CITY OFRENTONt$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oMUD rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 O CITY CLERK • (206) 235-25010, 9gr 0 SEP1°) September 9, 1986 Mr. John L. Hendrickson Shidler McBroom Gates & Lucas 505 Honeywell Center 600 108th Ave. NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Subject: Honey Creek Associates Rezone R 014-84 and PPUD 015-84 Dear Mr. Hendrickson: Your letter of August 27, 1986, requesting assistance in obtaining required right-of-way, was considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of September 8, 1986. The matter was referred to the City Attorney, Mr. Lawrence Warren, for preliminary investi- gative assistance and report back to the City Council. Mr. Warren will contact you. If you have .further questions please feel free to contact this office or Mr. Warren at 255-8678. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Mr. Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Ms. Nancy Mathews, Council President SHII ER McBROOM GATES& I ,AS Seattle ATTORNEYS AT LAW•A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION Bellevue 3500 First Interstate Center 505 Honeywell Center Seattle,Washington 98104 600108th Ave.N.E. Telephone(206)223-4600 Bellevue,Washington 98004 Telecopier(206)622-5110 Telephone(206)453-0300 Telex:29-2988 Telecopier(206)455-9166 JOHN L.HENDRICKSON CITY OF RENTON Bellevue Office 9, August 27, 1986 AUG 2 8 Int IJ ITY CIFRN'S OFFICE Jiqi City Council City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Honey Creek Associates Files Nos. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Dear Council Members: On April 14, 1986, the Council approved the above-referenced rezone and preliminary planned unit development applications of the Honey Creek Associates. Condition No. 3 of the approval requires the applicant to dedicate a full 40 foot-wide right-of-way aligned with N.E. 23rd Street, between Harrington Avenue N.E. and the subject property. The aforementioned condition requires the applicant to acquire property which is not now under its ownership in order to implement this condition. The Council members were aware of this fact at the time of the approval and imposition of the condition. We believe it was understood at the time of the approval by the Council members that, in the event the acquisition of the necessary property for the right-of-way became impractical or reasonably impossible, the City would assist in this endeavor by the utilization of its eminent domain powers. The applicant has negotiated for several months with the owner of the property which is needed for additional right-of-way. The owner of the property and its location are: Randy Corman, 2216 Harrington Place, N.E., Renton, Washington 98125. It is my understanding that Mr. Corman purchased his 1.2 acre parcel within the past year for a total of $78,000. The applicant has offered to purchase a 20' x 250' (5,000 sq. ft.) portion of Mr. Corman's property in order to provide the necessary additional right-of-way. The applicant has offered the amount of $3,335 which is the value Mr. Corman paid on a per-square-foot basis. This offer includes the value of the existing structure on this property, even though the structure is not located on the portion that is required to implement the subject condition. Mr. City Council-Renton Re: Honey Creek Associates August 27, 1986 p - 2 Corman has countered that he would sell the required portion of his parcel for 60,000 or would sell his whole parcel for $150,000. It has become apparent that Mr. Corman, either on his own or at the urging of others in his area, is attempting to make an unreasonable profit as a result of the City's requirement of the applicant, or is endeavoring to frustrate the implementation of the City Council's approval of the subject applications. In behalf of the applicant, we hereby respectfully request that the City Council members direct the administrative staff of the City, including the City Attorney, to review this matter with Mr. Corman and initiate condemnation proceedings if necessary. The applicant is willing to enter into an agreement with the City by which it would reimburse the City for its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, which it might incur in this matter. The applicant is willing to comply with each of the conditions which have been imposed by the City Council with regard to the subject application. The assistance of the City with regard to the implementation of the right-of-way condition will be very much appreciated and the Council Members are urged to request an expeditious resolution of this matter between the City and Mr. Corman. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, SHIDLER McBROOM GATES & LUCAS ilk Aksi 111.11 L. Hendrickson JLH:lcm cc: Mr. Bob Tomberg Mr. Lawrence J. Warren Mr. Mel Easter 003 INTEROFFICE MEMO ta . TO: Mike Parness DATE: 9/2/86 Larry Springer Ron Nelson/Roger Blaylock Lawrence Warren FROM: Maxine Motor SUBJECT: Attached letter from Shidler McBroom Gates & Lucas re Honey Creek Assoc. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 For your information. Attached letter to be placed on 9/8 agenda. Council on 4/14/86 denied the appeals and approved the rezone and preliminary PUD. This being concurrent rezone/annexation, the rezone ordinance was not adopted, pending approval from Boundary Review Board; 75% annexation hearing on 5/12/86. Annexation still pending with Boundary Review Board. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting May 12, 1986 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers M I NUT E S CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF NANCY L. MATHEWS, Council President; JOHN W. REED; RICHARD M. COUNCIL MEMBERS STREDICKE; KATHY A. KEOLKER ; ROBERT J. HUGHES ; EARL CLYMER ; THOMAS W. TRIMM. CITY STAFF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; ZANETTA FONTAS, Assistant City IN ATTENDANCE Attorney; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LARRY SPRINGER, Policy Development Director; LT. GARRY ANDERSON, Police Department. PRESS Tony Davis, Daily Record Chronicle APPROVAL OF MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES COUNCIL MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1986, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PROCLAMATIONS A proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared the month of May Better Hearing as Better Hearing and Speech Month to inform the public about and Speech Month - communicative disorders and how and where to get help, and May to encourage early detection, proper treatment and prevention of these disorders. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. Municipal A proclamation by Mayor Shinpoch declared the week of May 12- Clerks Week - 16, 1986, as Municipal Clerks Week in recognition of the May 12-16 vital services performed by Municipal Clerks in preserving records for posterity and implementing decisions of the legislative body. City Clerk Maxine Motor addressed the Mayor and Council , introduced her staff, and described their duties: microfilm services (Marian Spurling) ; printing services (Debbie Willard) ; record services (Gayle Nelson) ; and legislative services (Marilyn Petersen) . Mrs. Motor' indicated that the information desk in the City Hall lobby has been a successful venture, and volunteer staff have logged a total of 4,691 hours from the program' s commencement in January, 1984 through the end of April , 1986. Certificates of appreciation for volunteer service to the City of Renton were presented to Ann Grinolds, Helen Kent, Enid Perkins, Irma White, Mary Breda, Agnes Blake, Bert Nord, and Eileen Bruins. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, Honey Cred, published and mailed in accordance with State and local laws, 75% Annexation, Mayor Shinpoch opened the public hearing to consider the Honey Rezone and Creek 75% annexation petition for six parcels of property r eTT naE4 containing 59.30 acres, located southeast of NE 27th Street PUD and east of Kirkland Avenue NE in the area known as "Devil ' s R-014-84 Elbow." A concurrent rezone request (R-014-84) and Preliminary PPUD-015-84 Planned Unit Development application (PPUD-015-84) were approved by the City Council on 4/14/86 following review of two appeals of the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation. As part of that approval , R-1 and R-2 zoning were designated on the area west of the Honey Creek ravine, G-1 zoning for the ravine area, and R-1 zoning was designated east of the ravine. The 75%% petition contains signatures representing 82.9% of the assessed valuation within the annexation area, and participants have agreed to accept the City's zoning, Comprehensive Plan, and bonded indebtedness as a condition of annexation. Policy Development Director Larry Springer presented a general information report which explained the concurrent review process for the three applications; recommended support of the City Council ' s position on the rezone and preliminary PUD; and recommended approval of the annexation request. Renton City Council 5/12/86 Page two Public Hearing continued Honey Creek Referring to a vicinity map of the subject site, Mr. Springer 75% Annexation, designated location of zoning boundaries and proposed right- Rezone and of-way. He noted that Devil 's Elbow Road has not been included Preliminary due to concern with maintenance obligation and difficulty in PUD maneuvering emergency vehicles. R-014-84 PPUD-015-84 Prior City Council action on this matter was summarized, and it continued was noted that the rezone and preliminary PUD were approved with an amendment to rezone the two parcels located east of Honey Creek to an R-1 zone rather than a G-1 zone to eliminate necessity for the proponent to submit a rezone application at a later date. Submission of a detailed geotechnical report and site plan for the G-1 and R-1 zoned properties was required due to concern with stability of steep slopes. Mr. Springer also advised that a major change from the original PUD proposal is requirement of dedication of a 40-foot easement at the extension of NE 23rd Street as a condition of final PUD approval to ensure improvement of that roadway to City standards. Original approval for access at NE 21st Street has been eliminated; therefore, two primary access roads will be provided into the development, one at Jefferson Avenue NE and the other at NE 23rd Street. If the additional 20 feet of right-of-way on the south side of NE 23rd Street cannot be acquired, the development will not be allowed to proceed. Audience comment was invited. Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE, Suite 2, Bellevue, owner of Honey Creek Associates, indicated that original concerns identified by residents relating to dumping, noise, motorcycles, and fire and police protection have been addressed in the proposal through the review process. Therefore, he requested approval of the project by the Council . Roger Greene, 9818 124th Avenue SE, residing north and east of the subject site, questioned proposed density and indicated concern with access into the site from the north and east if Devil 's Elbow Road is barricaded in the future. He felt that King County residents should not be required to subsidize costs of improving access roads to the development site. Tom Malmoe, 12105 SE 196th Place, residing east of the proposal , questioned whether the required percentage of participants has signed the 75% annexation petition; inquired whether a nature trail will be provided along Honey Creek; and asked if the possible closure of McKnight Middle School has been considered in the review process. Mr. Springer confirmed that the petition represents 75% of the assessed valuation of the annexing area; an existing sewer easement is a possible area for a nature trail , but that phase of the project has not yet been considered. Norm Peterson, 3402 Park Avenue North, Renton, urged retention of natural vegetation areas; questioned whether the developer is being favored over residents; and wondered if there is a market for new residential units. Mayor Shinpoch noted that market studies are usually accomplished prior to undertaking the expensive development process. Mrs. Wayne Oyler, 2132 Harrington Place NE, requested clarification of proposed access into the site. Mr. Springer explained location of recommended access points from Jefferson Avenue NE and NE 23rd Street, if right-of-way can be acquired. Kathleen Gormley, 2820 NE 23rd Place, indicated her understanding that NE 23rd Street would be used for emergency access only. Mr. Springer reiterated previous comments, noting that full improvement of NE 23rd Street as a primary access point into the site has been required to comply with building and fire codes. Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, requested that the matter of roadway widths be investigated since a total 60-foot width meets requirement for collector road. Mr. Springer referenced Planning and Development Committee report which states that an r Renton City Cour,,,, , 5/12/86 Page three Public Hearing continued Honey Creek additional 20 feet of right-of-way must be acquired inorder75% Annexation, provide a 40-foot roadway.Rezone and Preliminary Donald Joss, 9805 126th Avenue SE, indicated that accessfromPUD the east side of the site will be an issue duringfutureR-014-84 consideration of development on theeasternPPUD-015-84 since existing streets are substandard. portion of the si continued Bob Tomberg described clustering concept for the site which results in less density than that allowed in a singlefamilyplat. He indicated that a maximum of 67 units would be allowed on the east side of the creek if and when theCityrelocatespoliceandfireservicestoservethesiteandotherareastothenorth. He was not opposed to provisionofanaturetrailassupportedbyresidents, and indicated that access via Devil 's Elbow Road was not preferred by staff. Responding to Councilman Reed's question regardingstandardroadwayrequirementsonNE23rdStreet, Mr. Springerindicatedcertaintythatafullroadwaysectionwithcurbs, gutters, and sidewalks can be provided within the required 40-footwidth. Responding to further concern by Mrs. Wayne Oyler, Councilwomar Mathews asked that the Public Works Department clarifytheroadwaywidthsofNE23rdStreetfromEdmondsAvenueNEtoHarringtonAvenueNEanddesignateownership. She noted thattheintentoftheCouncilwastocontinuethesameroadwayconfigurationintothesiteviaNE23rdStreetascurrentlyexistsfromEdmondsAvenueNEtoHarringtonAvenueNE. Councilwoman Keolker referenced the Hearing Examiner's report on the rezone and PPUD which stated that theroadwaywidthvariesfrom45feetinthatareawiththewidthofthepavedareabeingless. Responding to Councilwoman Keolker' s questionregardingallowabledensityofthepropertyunderKingCountydevelopmentstandards, Mr. Springer reported densities of from two tofourlotsperacre. However, he doubted that developmentwouldproceedwithoutannexationsinceconnectiontoCitysewer system is not allowed for property in King County. Referencing Mr. Peterson's comments regarding retentionofgreenbeltareas, Councilman Stredicke indicated thelikelihoodofinstallationofatrailatalaterdate, an extensiveamountofopenspacehasbeenretainedinthedevelopment, and theCityconsistentlyrequiresretentionofnaturallandscapedareasbydevelopers. Mitch Murray requested further review of allowable densityinKingCountyzoningcategoriessinceheclaimedKingCounty zoning on the subject site prohibits PUDS and allows only one unit per acre due to steep topography on the site. Mr. Greene urged retention of G-1 zone for the area east of the ravine since he felt development will be delayed formanyyearsandthegeotechnicalinformationremainstobeanalyzed. Council members Keolker, Reed and Mathews noted they supported the Planning and Development Committee report whichrecommendedretentionofG-1 zoning in that area. However, as a resultof4-3 vote, R-1 zoning had been assigned. An explanation of the procedure to transfer density within a planned unit development was requested byCouncilwomanMathews. Mr. Springer explained the process forclusteringunitswithintopographicalareasofthesite, whichresultsiinlessimpacttothelandscape, less generation of traffic, and preservation of open space. He noted need for substantial grading to install network of roadways and createbuildablelotsinsinglefamilyresidentialplat. Renton City Council 5/12/86 Page four Public Hearing contin ed Honey Creek Michael Gormley, 816 North 4th, former resident of the area 75% Annexation, west of the subject site, claimed that NE 23rd Street was Rezone and originally intended to serve only the residents of the existing Preliminary housing project. He cited impact to the neighborhood from wild PUD dogs, motorcycles, noise and young children in the ravine area; R-014-84 indicated concern with potential drainage from the proposal PPUD-015-84 into existing developed lots; and noted poor visibility and substandard condition of NE 23rd Street. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke clarified that as a result of the conditions imposed on the R-1 zone approval for the area east of the ravine, development of any kind is prohibited. While he understood concerns of neighbors for creation of a four- lane access road, he supported two access points into the development. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL PROCEED WITH THE HONEY CREEK ANNEXATION, REZONE AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AS RECOMMENDED BY THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND REFER THE ANNEXATION TO KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL TAKE A TEN- MINUTE RECESS. CARRIED. Time: 9:35 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:47 p.m. ; roll was called; all members were present. AUDIENCE COMMENT Laura Cochran, 14412 141st Avenue SE, addressed the Council on Sierra Heights behalf of residents of Sierra Heights area interested in annexing Annexation to the City of Renton. She reported contacting other cities Request in the area to compare annexation fees, and has found that Renton' s fees are the highest. Mrs. Cochran submitted a map designating residential lots whose owners support the annexation proposal , and cited serious sewage and storm drainage problems in the area. Upon inquiry, Policy Development Director Springer confirmed the City' s annexation fee of $500 plus additional fees for SEPA review. Following discussion regarding the scheduling of this matter on the Committee of the Whole agenda, it was moved by Stredicke, seconded by Mathews, Council find the request before it involves single property owners in an area that is a logical extension of the City boundaries and can be properly served by City utilities; therefore, the annexation fees be waived. Due to legal concerns raised by Assistant City Attorney Fontas relating to reference of a specific class of people, motion not accepted by Mayor Shinpoch. Ms. Fontas indicated she will research the matter and report back to Council . An updated vicinity map reflecting latest land use actions was also requested by Council . CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Bid Opening - City Clerk reported bid opening 5/7/86 for 1986 Houser Way 1986 Houser Rubberized Track Material ; one bid; Engineer' s estimate: Way Rubberized S50,000.00. Refer to Transportation Committee. (See later Track Material action.) Bid Opening - City Clerk reported bid opening 5/7/86 for 1986 Steel Water 1986 Steel Water Main Replacements in Presidents Park; 11 bids; Engineer' s Main Replacements estimate: $179,569.77. Refer to Utilities Committee. in President Park See later action.) Interim Financing Finance Department requested review of interim financing for LID 330 and offer from Rainier Bank for LID 330 (Grady Way) and LID 332 LID 332 Oakesdale Avenue) . Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Hydrant Ordinance Fire Prevention Department requested amendment to Ordinance No. 3541 , Hydrant Ordinance. Refer to Public Safety Committee. 166A. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES ANNEXATION Annexation Review Summary - Public Hearing - May 12, 1986) A. `)UMMARY AND LOCATION he applicant proposes the annextion of six (6) parcels of property containing ± 9.30 acres and with signatures constituting 82.9% of the assessed valuation within the proposed annexing area. The subject properties are located southeast of N.E. 7th Street and east of Kirkland Avenue N.E. in the area known locally as "Devil's Elbow." A concurrent rezone request (R-014-84) and planned unit development application (PPUD-015-84) have also been filed for the subject site. On April 14, 986, the City Council approved R-1 and R-2 zoning west of the Honey Creek ravine and R-1 zoning east of the ravine. The ravine itself was designated G-1. B. GENERAL INFORMATION he City limits in the vicinity of the subject annexation were created by Ordinance No. 1622 (June 24, 1957), Ordinance No. 1796 (October 7, 1959), and Ordinance No. 401 (February 11, 1980). King County zoning of the subject properties includes the following: 1) RS-7200 Residential Single Family SE Suburban Estate SR Suburban Residential 1 he City of Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as Single Family i- the northwest and northeast portions while the west central and southwest l ortions are classified Low Density Multiple Family and the north and south central sections are considered Greenbelt. C. PUBLIC SERVICES City of Renton water service is currently provided to the developed properties both to the south and west and north and east of the proposed annexing area. Water service to the proposed annexation would require looping of the water system through the annexation to provide appropriate connections. Sanitary sewers in the immediate vicinity are provided by the City of Renton, and the recently constructed 12" Honey Creek Interceptor has significantly increased the capacity. Fire service is currently provided by Fire District No. 25 and would be provided by the Renton Highlands Station at N.E. 9th Street and Harrington Avenue N.E. Equipment and personnel include one fire pumper, four firefighters, and one aid car. Back-up s ipport for large scale fires would come from the Headquarters Station located at 200 Mill Avenue South with a pumper, ladder truck, and aid car staffed by eight firefighters. City of Renton police patrols occur in the neighborhoods immediately south and west of the proposed annexation. D. I NALYSIS 1. Departments evaluating the subject annexation have not identified any severe problems related to their areas of responsibility as a result of this proposal. However, the Public Works and Police Departments and Fire Prevention Bureau have all expressed concerns about access and provision of emergency services to the site. (See later discussion.) 2. Reviewing departments have indicated that the proposed annexation represents a logical extension of services provided by their departments. 3. All departments have indicated that service to this area could be accommodated within existing facilities, staff, and budget resources, except that the Police Department advises that an additional patrol vehicle and 4-1/2 officers could be required to maintain 24-hour service. 2 - 4. The Fire Prevention Bureau has noted that allowable response times to the subject site will be reached when the North Kennydale Fire Station is operational and the present Highlands Station is moved to the east (based upon full development of the site). 5. It is essential that existing area school land is available for park use advises the Parks and Recreation Department. If not, an additional park may be required. Also, when the site is developed the proponent should submit a plan for retaining greenbelts (open space). On-site recreation is essential to the area. Also a recreational easement is recommended on the site for future City trails. 6. City Council Resolution No. 2429 establishes policies for the evaluation of annexation applications. The proposed annexation is generally consistent with those policies favoring extension of public services, falls within the City's identified sphere of influence, and is within its general service areas. E. MAJOR ISSUES 1. Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place S.E.) - The Public Works Department recommended that this section of roadway (near the northwesterly extreme of the site) be excluded from the proposed annexation because the City of Renton would be faced with exclusive responsibility for maintenance of the street and this would be prohibitively expansive at this time given the traffic volumes on it. Citing service delays on site and elsewhere due to inadequate road design and access, the Police Department also expressed serious concern about Devil's Elbow. The Fire Prevention Bureau also advised that development of the site north and east of the long ravine (extending northwest-southwest) would result in unacceptable time limitations on fire response unless the capital improvements noted in D-4 (above) are constructed. For these reasons, the Devil's Elbow section of roadway has been removed from the annexation proposal. 2. Zoning East of the Ravine - On January 17, 1986 the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the rezone and the preliminary P.U.D. subject to several conditions. The zoning recommended included R-1 and R-2 categories west of the Honey Creek ravine with the remainder of the site designated G-1. The Hearing Examiner's decision was appealed and after reviewing the appeal, the Council's Planning and Development Committee recommended the Hearing Examiner's decision be upheld subject to the following: 1) Submission of a final PUD for eventual development of the subject site. 2) Annexation of the site into the City of Renton. 3) Dedication of a full 40 foot wide right-of-way aligned with N.E. 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue N.E. and the site with an engineering report and specifications for a full street improvement as required by City Code. 4) Submission with the final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Building and Zoning and Public Works Departments. The report shall include but not be limited to information regarding: site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to the current state: long term implications of the development on erosion potential; geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; site preparation and restoration: and building techniques. 5) Plans for the final PUD shall be more detailed and provide a description of the usable open space, recreation and building details. 3 - 6) The applicant shall provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. In addition, the applicant shall record covenants running with the land requiring that the slope on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as closely as is possible in its natural state. 7) The submission of detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc. 8) The elimination of the connection and entry of N.E. 21st Street. 9) The property zoned G-1 shall have no development upon the property without the City being provided with detailed geotechnical information regarding the site and site plan or PUD approval. The applicant shall sign and file a restrictive covenant, running with the land, so stating. 10) This is a conceptual approval of a preliminary planned unit development and does not vest in the applicant or its successor or assigns any development rights on this parcel of property without recommendation by City staff and approval by the Council of the geotechnical studies required above. On April 14, 1986 the full City Council reviewed Planning and Development's recommendation and approved it with the following revision: Condition #9 was amended to reflect that two large parcels east of the Honey Creek ravine would be zoned R-1 rather than G-1. This was approved 4-3 after the proponent argued that it would make greater sense to rezone the area at this stage rather than later and reduce an already lengthy process. Some Council members concurred in these remarks and reminded those present that there would still be ample opportunity for more intensive review when the final P.U.D. application was submitted. City Attorney Larry Warren clarified that the intent of this amended language was to reflect that both of these parcels zoned R-1 shall have no development without submission of required studies and that the G-1 zoned area would retain identical restrictions as well as zoning constraints which permit just one dwelling per 35,000 square feet. F. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the foregoing analysis, the Policy Development Department supports the City Council's position on the rezone and preliminary P.U.D. and the various City departments' recommendations for approval of the requested annexation. It is, therefore, advised that the petition application be approved by Council and that the Policy Development Department be instructed to submit a notice of intent package to the King County Boundary Review Board pursuant to existing policy. WA11.4' ire ST.5.E w 1 AT. ii_y 1 I 1 I 1 374 114S• We K D11> 11 0115 II I 7•,. I. MO 1fi7 571 ri I. I.t.::, `. : E V Y . of i i.. ..11_ 1 1 L.:. r Ii_I. ttii/C41 ., I. .... l>i:. I.:.1.., D tD SL 1 i I T1 1 MI aft, °o, 407 ao> M P is. 1 1 fae R R sal i.. i`,. i 11 II RAC iM. CW j1 t r I RENTON CITY LIMIT' W 1 /I Nip t!• LLI LLO 20! a Ku T 1i al 1,T L22 2e! t , UMW'4fltt /1// 14 ''',/•/ T/ON 1:: 1 wOi I SIERRA HEIGHTS xrZ I. 51 I I;!-D© a1 11 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL e&see NE RR . r+ ins T - ' lip 1a t+r+kl A e,; u. o '`0>OR3RIlIS' • 7^ .. 1 . . • 1- VIIwill rell14 ' ikrill IF, has ` SS8lI I,i mi f H ,•,. r,., , a.,,.I,M I,Y 1, .1 11"`' 111 V 5L 1°i T1 t Iis . TI7 . I-- « l f `-;' C as e 0 lmoonoe i .. .v ,. Ln o0 0©0,00 mOmmlmm m llill stair v, I N . o 7 10 . a IIP•.OHM i III 1111 S to >®R2111 1INIwMeP: , raii kris 15.1111111111111 11:klitiiii. e" ' Are e ,o•b1 m - ell zz> la ow es m©©* ' q, ill mi. nirs ors ES 9 tP41/1: Air.A1110° AS))/ WM. RI , MI gi fir la( e 11 0 x 1 1R1a111i1 1E#1:`_,9 i;' t: 1r4iilisPf 1eP,. s 1, mt,o.,m.s,. ..;..:. L.. L'* . oliilkPk- hsi1 oA1n1eA • . 1i!: L I.,M'.,.'.•,.,„; i•,i lia 4l 411A6w.7K22o.1r1rhni•. aRMn. Ia R1if -`V7 y s, QQ LLCRES n /' 13- Sg1. . .' " CLEMETI M. s I r 1 i YL Atr oc .. 13 Ph iL1 ally dr l. ' e 10'. gpm rlNDS st ® 0p vl11111rtAVYe ' ' .,— Is n gi ..BE : _1_..:, :,on. I a I 291 220 2f s 1 C" 11 MCKMIGHT as f 1 JR HIGH N a .. » 'i 2,.= - i —' I SCHOOL rn n I • 1 1 t t e r./ 111"MF-. t• L ; I f,ft..l • I 1 I- L LDO 29 ' 211 a. O f Q•• 1_,‘ $,P'VitS^- I 1 t NI L i.1 a, -- f i '__y.- ` I,., V' o . a..LJT`C s yam. 11 I, i><° 1 a Lb y° r - ' #- If I 1 ^d`r 4g CAS- ' . 5 , 1 , 11-- r \ Yt it _;, Il I I FT TW II I I'•1 ( '%1 1,1 • . (. .o•. __ CITY OF RENTON DR i t hi " 4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLICWORKSi T e Pis" ' AIlb O,t/EK GREEX1 PO, 5ED A5j.Q e,'7!' a-' z DESIGNED__ L. ,Y DATE / QS. GL FILE NO. c 0,,,, Ilk J a `Ystt ^ DRAWN _ ti 8d0aA `._s SCALE '* LiL/' FI[LO a00Y PA iL_ WI qi p ly . a L. CHECKED—_ 544 - 555 1 11 \ WS N: N__//1 57 i 577. 46 IP % 'L.\ IC" /it P".400,A0P ...A no /IiI A...... .., I 1... ,- 411 1 '. I 410", 71 lip ...., .30 .....04,,r 4 , 0 3 F4 Sty 574 ' set S1SS 1 1... i..: i---i i 11. I....tsil4,i.'"1.f....:...), i...../1. .E.: \s/ ir. : . - : . 1 . ,.,. ':.' '.. i 1 •l' 0 asi 4110, , 1 1 I I 1 1 i I I I 506 3113 .sor 1 1 403 407 404 P. 544 4 I 466 i:)i V:. VIP 1111116'R..9- I 3r, ,,\ PAC.IFIC. COAVT sTo sea 366 NM 1 1 • 1 I . 1 S177 [ 1 4sIIIIIIIII'' I 1 I l A.. — jer, I 540 1 1 L.,... 77s 4014 404 406 0 1 , 1 • MI tr I 111•• I S. III no t06. 41 '''ENT4P4 (IT LINAT-i-T— E t: 1---' 1 gm"\'rli ' I I 1 ill 4.4. I 41 0.irliSti4 \71k. I I I I 1 tiza 161 EC`41 - . --: '4P4111*ili 0Ilb I 1 ) •L 4 lig t I tly!„, 4 a atv, 1 ..4 T.T. Allk \ 4 al V-i Inillet IpPi 5IERRA HE iCarIT$ vs' tV• Z 23 • .„ 205 %ill .,I-- 1...11—, 1 i.b- 7:, 11f. 1 1 11 4I: I-,."V f41M-..:19 i „! i. s...,, . 1 :, i • f D. 1 I r. 7..... ,.. .. 7 ; Iv........4 s . 0ST -,_-- /. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL P V% 4 11 . L 1 4 , 14 • I1lt• lall \% CI* %I 1103 t$.111'..••:,.2.II tt se NA 111 112* sr rr., ‘. . ,, ...7., .. sr,.. 10;41 I ego, -..• •-•-••- t.', des 1 ae eat 1,T II i rzziss,„•g.is It!", '`. -1-: 1.'-, . 20 ari , 1 oe vii • • DIM IrilglantletirLA .m• Is. 44747111471,_ -07/ I..., 774.40•77 4' ' rillpV ris it Arm .7 110 Mem c, 3 I Eleaking i , I I r2•-‘2.) \RA ...' Si, • 40141 r14' '' • '.. •• ' .- 711.r.S...1fr 'L- i . IMO 05 i . ba U El I 4 • 2311 ••••••••• .r. •Cb Ile,in it, . --.1 CO , . •10.. ,111.• •• 1.•r•1•111.•444111111 "5 ' 4—1 maw L ' ... rigi.• dii. 2. ' III Vii,...Da int it .• se s.IssIss ss s,... 1'.., r...... ME12: 11111. 014 t rswo,• % .2 I iv mo.i, N :7=1r_ lit mit l' 4 •._ 7.7.= ...._ eat••••••.••6.••1 1111 in) rt o • .. % UM':ono t __. po 2.%.••,,..1 Ail: . " , 401\ 11 11 s.::::L: io, ..•t) ilign........16 /AV S 4 t n.01131 ___ I LJ:41^• 1•: 4' 4" A f.•,... t.:•*.- ",;) WIP 40'• A - .. r7-Ai rrifrai isalla. Oa a e'••' ' LICKS,. - i..:.•s Lill .: kf/111111r4 iu. I.., .,.• - r:i vorriervi 1iitI • -Jai. - . • ' • l----o 4%—sy _ . Ittg-,940.....17:,.., -.. ,1-..- , .•;.' .,..,14, „..,.: -- ..';' IA . 1.6.61. M421rall / '.:: ' • ' t' 6..L U..... NORTH - 4- ' I-4.- j y a. ',47:-. :7-. " _21in HIGHt'1.n ' t.._ .6 1- 1 136-40 gm A , • •. wel. • 1 .... 4 PA.t.,,• ',..--"/ --- 1 p-,q19.•a t141 r los ....-:-..: •. . ., ,. . -5-.. 0 Mg 6. i 1 • . ...,, i I. , 1 ..i....rYiL;war. ii. t 4L• ..11 ......- 1 1 r,000,1 II2.'''.,.. N\ cl.'.. ..- 7.. N ''' . •I %V 74/ . . • ; , 7 1 1 1 Il ' la.A , .1. .. is. . I.1 ii , ‘, a :' . .. ese:Pa 1 Mg 5i Z28 , trt 7 r 1 -.. i ;•1 ,.- 1 E t4cAN-of T 'I ' • " a mcg,„„ irli 41W . 4 11 ' 4 -(.. .7 - ism. soAFGi4 , ' • . iHoot. 1,1 13.10r/.1 R5025 ' ell 1 1 1, 1 d gl. 7,... 6 \ \ ___ 4 &. --- I. 1 i 4 4 6 , . t. F.••-1 "I I ' 2.. MU • . Will NZ 1 1 I ^ 4"..• ..•' , . r g . a ill I % 11'T:Z,4:'... ack2. 4•41r . _. .. I'...-:..".. 7 w.•*i i TIF-4 1. ; 0 • grill IF iMisfft,airip: 4•:' 4, lia-_ MHz . , at; flititill'`"; 1,, . 1 MI" os, . :ie or., 1 •_;]-, 7-:-.-4--.-•,. ce 11;a glijkla.= ; r. 1.d / ita .1. •. 9 1. ,.. 1. :i r....,,,- 7-1— Imo BIM 11111111071417 . 4, 6,21W/7 Air I 1 .•4 • , 1311111111.0„ n Ellat,san, 11:-..-, ,,..,. -• i 1! i 4. ' ,,' Pu , I L.i•-•1"..'.. -12013 NOM r ripeillor „ . NIVIIIN., .. .1. 1__ .• 1 : ivitr6tb.: •: ... IR 13. ril • 1 11_ i —.meta•5 tral s zip dgil 5 t 01111.'"i I6V• .1i.T. 1: IM Pin 6 1, 1- iw, ..ppro)-I.I ..., 1•4# II 7 CE I. 575 1 5/4 577 NC 6,6did Ti. j. "' CI '4 ja \, j ' 1 I I IF.r.4 0 I"WA' ' to III I 71511011 Fr=Fr I 3 74 1 6 676 515L 565 r3Taii....„ *0* •10 I 6/67 I s 1-4 i 1. i: v .,,i1,.. otoroo 1N a. 1:-1so-W. ;,.........,..,/./ SS* MI6 402 *OS T 409 I 1 i.eI S '. ' I,' f7- I \ \1 i. W Ir, *. \ PAC r iC5,0 COA5I c_it. 7 Se I • N II .I I V '^ - ; 57II I J 557 140: 4011 as. at. a,a) , st GIENIT.44 CIT'f LIMIT'. 11 .. 1 l ' 1 ili mi IIti11 SS? fil. it 11 EG4 - 4-4 I 11 1 - W4 \ I ii 1.,,, 1 ) ma SU Zos SHOOL lilL" :1- Tal. .i644%1Firiliil I s .3 3 . 7,.• 73/••• i 111111514 1 i 0 ‘. ., 4 ,/ , 1 ia Li EERmREAN C5Ss'lc 115V1.• t, 1 1 , / I t't I . 4 i gh. • • MOW jr, P 77-7,7-,,..-.. 1 1:.‘ ill•It7 5tija ig!agnil! . milimillit': '" ."4' i..- ;"..1 1 7';-- 1, • y , 4.......„ 5I5_ Elatil54; i 111$$ Ms.'"tall MN"1 " a•,.' S /4.C/1... b.Zi..t•IS n. T al 1 ,. , a 112 ' iir ii. .,.,U- .. ''• 1 NM.Eptim.'"••• - - : AZi ,' _ iiit: ea VI '11 i 'ILI . . . -r,— d. is 1 Ellirillal i 115011t:ter ea Ell . PP ••••••••••• .... - ...,,..Mlle 1111111CM:10 i MITI- i1 ::: % 1 . i , 0 rill kith I r - 1-'- H 1 • if Ill° , ,-, 1.1...j cS ,r, , ., 1000ii gra; it- -, ,.. 'a .i., ,., • I ,. *111.11111 nom j rrillifr-_, I: mom. WI. 0 j 0 66 i • no. t 1,__._tAt 1 IS n 5..4455 as traa,5:\a.as 5v'IIIIhpsens . Dingell.Ora de!-. n OM 9/ i 1. " : •ti - - : k... 1 I Mtn unorm4I sasson . rosI ,_..,..,.._,_ 7,_..-,_ til!idler0 'Eil•c, No JO. I:la. I f.”.2.• '• ..,.,•,, i Atii",:Icr alai r-.744413.‘' 101 14.1 v t s s' railiicircL06tt•t... 1`.• ,..LI.CR4 5 7• • • s al./ i.--.4._•..- i Milibbb l•-• i• • • •- ci i ktoturr '• -1 t__ . t t gill 4i .rit,.54. : or. r • ...Dal • ." ' 2 . l'A I i I._eiltrgt6.1741 .7)71-....' •171-.- , -•-. ..,...1,4.. ,,. 1 - ..,. ri:717' ;77.*..1 \ 11 I —. RIP 7S, IIIIMP4esiaaen4 :__ . ' . •,• v u••:. . NORTH ,- '. ri!"!-: 1- 471'' nnilin , Ar3ir-Inn A . 4 • .. •i '','1• -''' -.. % 41: 14rDs •• •) - 1 INCII,1,1.,. :1 i \ i.-.;„.•. s . . . . . 0% 'I % to iu In a•. i 6 1.t•T. 4.4. 46 IJiLtII 5-a• 'VI.1 1 ''.. St._ , 1, II. 1 1 .II11111 \ .1113 ------.-- 4/ 10' t 231 226 , 2 I i I '.4'" IAINiMCII,N,Carli tIr., ., ( Ai .„, • 66 ; 4-. ,,( 1 : 4 1, 1, Ii1I ra • I,.r 4 I 1• z . . -111 2'30 29 CAI ili • 21 ,.. J . .-:_16 •d 4. 1m4„1, a . . sPIP.11 , ‘1: — F 7, , \- , .42_ f I ,,.•< ... Mirk;WI t I, 1 4 fi al e .,, t, . . • . i10 A• Ming i 1„ er. alis•no Pei " _______ pi : ...p. .. „ .,, ,- al; IrRii ..-:%ssi, sa. areg<je.--Nan . .7 43 n . elsoz clivi Ls-.initi1 - , 1117:1°-‘ t' 41. ni.' ill IL;"r::::-' I' l.!'_ IS CISOPLU 2 - done atoll gl.Iii mira,-...;) a la - one is 1,, , ,•01, 0.i 55 /// Tr Mi : rit ea o 'all n 10".00013 is • ft: El:, , , ,Itie , it ,t, • ..acne tsirsw a 1!.asa,le,fi,itiSTorolI1 •.., INdl lir irm 1 FIRMS g. nilig115 tont,ati, i, t, n n i IVO lip 2 , /,.le vir , . ... . .. .... ROM In noriCIO___ ACI 117ot I :, - . 11tN ._ , na. 1 1P 1._ no NAIRN sirilr,,, c , • CV i - , ilvp'+. 1 MI !I r Mr, I 0 In s .• , s 10 ityLA S s Ill! Agg S ' Pi I go r, . !si- t •4 . oxen raP. -,:pipi: m eli7 ICI IP / 7 37 0••• . 4. A1r.Ll 21, 1986 Renton City Council Minutes Page 11 Department for a new Mechanical Inspector/Combination (Grade 9, level a) in the Building and Zoning Department to perform inspections to assure compliance with the Uniform Mechanical and Plumbing Code and related construction inspections. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 14319 through 14645 in the amount of $793 , 255. 70, having received departmental approval that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered. Vouchers 14324-14333 machine voided. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch reported the complaint lodged by REPCRT Lois Ord regarding access to Valley General Valley General Hospital 's emergency entrance during peak hours Hosfital Emergency for eastbound traffic making left turn on SW 43rd AccEss had been investigated. Fire, Police, and Public Works Departments all agreed that peak traffic in this area was heavy, but no other complaints had been received, and the hospital would have notified the City should access be a problem. Driveway Chaining Mayor Shinpoch reported Mike Lazor' s request to obtain a permit to place a chain link fence across his driveway will be discussed directly with Ron Nelson, Building and Zoning Director. Elected Women Mayor Shinpoch announced that she, Councilwoman of hashington Keolker, and Council President Mathews have been Convention invited to greet the Elected Women of Washington Convention to be held at the Renton Sheraton on Friday, April 25. The Mayor noted there are 1, 769 women elected to office within the State, and is pleased Renton will be well-represented. Renton Handicap Mayor Shinpoch reported the 50th running of the Renton Handicap will be held Sunday, April 27 , at Longacres . Bond Presentation Mayor Shinpoch announced plans for Finance Director Clements, Administrative Assistant Parness, Council President Mathews, and Deputy Finance Director Bennett to travel to New York on May 7-8 to make a presentation to Moody' s Investors Service, a national bond rating organization. Administrative Assistant Parness indicated a presentation would be made to maintain the A-1 bond rating the City currently enjoys . Expenses will be paid by Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation from administrative fees paid to them by the City. Mr. Parness reported giving this presentation at this time has been strongly recommended by our bond counsel . AUDIENCE COMMENT Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, requested that Creek Item 9 of the Planning and Development Committee Assoc_.a es Report of 4/14/86 (Honey Creek Associates PPUD 014-84 015-84 , R-014-84) be reconsidered and accepted as BUD-015-84 originally written and the zoning of property east of Honey Creek ravine be limited to G-1 as recommended by the Hearing Examiner and the Planning and Development Committee. Mr. Murray indicated the R-1 zoning as voted by Council is premature at this time and would require future downzoning due to soil stability and access problems. City Attorney Warren stated a public hearing has been scheduled for this matter on 5/12/86, and Mr. Murray' s request may be heard at April 21. 1986 Renton City Council Minutes Page 12 that time. Mr. Warren also clarified that the requirement for a public hearing governing dedication of land within this PPUD would be satisfied by the 5/12 public hearing. Bryant Motors Dixon Long, 131 Garden Avenue North, requested the Rezone Support record reflect his support of the rezone being sought by Bryant Motors. Lightning Strike Mayor Shinpoch reported a lightning bolt struck a transformer and then flashed to an underground vault causing a blackout and subsequent evacuation of City Hall on 4/15/86. Only minor damage to computer wiring was reported. Executive Session MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL Time: 12 : 02 a.m. CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS REAL ESTATE DEALINGS. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session; roll was Time: 12 :24 a.m. called; all members were present. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. DA1 CLEMEN2S, , Finance Director Recorder: Jane Gray Caty of Renter Check Distr1butiCn F^no Total Checks CURRENT 132,196.02 PARKS 53,236.25 ARTERIAL STREETS 249.24 STREETS 46.3E3.69 LIERARY 1C,226.33 GREEN RIVER kILDLI'E 312.30 GEN GOUT MISC DIET SERV 16,902.89 STREET FORWARD TrRuST 38,703.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 127,712.63 WATERWORKS UTILITY 225,391.32 AIRPORT 4,740.76 GOLF COURSE FUND 7,408.72 WATER t SEWER CONSTRUCTION 52,334.08 ECUIPMENT RENTAL 29,658.68 INSURANCE FUND 6,825.03 FIREMEN'S PENSION 18,225.44 LID CONTROL 66.54 Tote' of all [necks 772,572.89 Wire Transfer Disbursements 20,682.81 Total of All Disbursements 793,255.70 MACHINE VOIDS: No.4 14324 -14323 War the und•rslGn•C members of the Wry; me Mar,; Commltta• of the Renton City Council. raving r•ceiv•o departmental certification trot merchencise end/or services have De n 9 received or rendered, dohereby3 eoorove 'for o•ye•nt Vouchers Nc. ttret throupn No. 14 .1.E--r end Ware transfers in the total amount of 5793,255.70 tnis 21st Pry of April 1986. As autn0r12ed by Resolution No. 2614, 'only disbursements In the amount of 20,682.81 I as Per the ettacneo, rre included in the tottl of all disbursements. Committee Chili-men 44.4 t'-- Member / 1 r M•mCI r J 1r\he Ka-E-i en - rle y, E- 0Iq—B Lire , CITY-OF RENTQN. NOTICE Of PUBLIC HEARING AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 12th day Audrey De J o i e of May, 1986,at 8:00 p.m. in theCouncilbeingfirstdulyswornonoathstatesthatChambersoftheRentonMunicipalBuild- he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ing, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for i public hearing to consider the following: The 75% Annexation Petition filed by VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Honey Creek Associates proposing anne- xation of 47.7 acres located southeast of Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News N.E.27th Street and east of Kirkland Ave. N.E.in area known as"Devil's Elbow."A Dail newspapers six(6) times a week.That said newspapers concurrent rezone nt(PPUD-04) 15-84) Plann- Ypublisheded Unit Development(PPUD-015-84)will are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six be considered with the annexation. Re- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published zone R-014-84 proposes zoning 12.7 acres to 0-1,29 acres to R-1 and 6 acres to in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King R-2. County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal Any and all interested persons are newspapers order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for invitedi to be present to voice approval, by P g disapproval or opiniQns.on same. King County. city of Renton Maxine E. Motor City of Clerk The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Published in the D a ily R,cord chronicle l prll 1$ dS:4.ca y.,1w aru ur.t,.,yJournal , Daily Record Chronicle , Daily Globe News , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Public Haring was published on April 18, 1986 R1513 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 20•79 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 23rd day of Apri9 b6 C. N a blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN*87 Revised 10/84 M Renton City Council 4/14/86 Page four Audience Comment continued Renton Loop Mike Lazor, 32 SW Victoria Street, Renton, inquired whether a permit is required for him to place a chain link fence across his driveway on Friday and Saturday nights. Mayor Shipoch indicated that she would research the request. Recess MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 9:22 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:32 p.m. ; roll was called; all Council members were present. AUDIENCE COMMENT Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE #2, Bellevue, requested advancement Advancement to to the Planning and Development Committee report concerning Old Business Honey Creek Associates appeals. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Plannin and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Keolker presented eve opment a report regarding two appeals filed on the Honey Creek Associates Committee rezone and preliminary planned unit development, located in the oney Creek vicinity of 2200 Jefferson Avenue (Devil ' s Elbow) . Associates R-014-84 The Committee report stated that detailed geotechnical and PPUD-015-84 engineering information must be provided before the final PUD is approved. Also, full street improvements on a 40- foot public right-of-way alignment with NE 23rd Street must be installed to provide access to the development. The Committee recommended that both appeals, from Honey Creek Associates, developer, and Mitch Murray, area resident , be denied. The Committee further recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and approve the requested zoning for the site subject to the following conditions: 1) Submission of a final PUD for eventual development of the subject site; 2) Annexation of the site into the (Tity of Renton; 3) Dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue NE and the site, with an engineering report and specifications for full-street improvement as required by City Code; 4) Submission with the final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with approval of both Building & Zoning and Public Works Departments. The report shall include but not be limited to information regarding site stability/slope integrity; preservation of ravine and stream close to their current state; long term erosion potential by the development; geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; site preparation and restoration; and building techniques; 5) Plans for the final PUD shall be more detailed, and provide a description of the usable open space, recreation and building details; 6) The applicant shall provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. In addition, the applicant shall record covenants running with the land requiring that the slope on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as closely as is possible in its natural state; 7) The submission of detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc. ; 8) The elimination of the connection and entry of NE 21st Street; Later modified c9) The property zoned G-1 shall have no development upon the property without the City being provided with detailed geotechnical information regarding the site and site plan or PUD approval . The applicant shall sign and file a restrictive covenant, running with the land, so stating; Renton City Council 4/14/86 Page five Planning & Development Committee Report continued Honey Creek 10) This is a conceptual approval of a preliminary planned Associates unit development and does not vest in the applicant or its R-014-84 successor or assigns any development rights on this parcel PPUD-015-84 or property without recommendation by city staff and approval by the Council of the geotechnical studies required above. Chairman Keolker indicated that the Committee had met several times to resolve concerns related to emergency access. She also advised that the 75% Annexation Petition and concurrent rezone hearing for Honey Creek Associates will be held by the Council on May 12, 1986. Referencing Condition No. 9 of the Committee report, Mr. Tomberg agreed that development of the property on the easterly side of the ravine cannot proceed until detailed geotechnical studies and fire and police services are provided. However, to eliminate the need to reapply for a rezone in the future, he requested that those parcels be rezoned to R-1 at this time. He also noted that development cannot proceed until a PUD is reviewed and approved by the Council . MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Councilman Stredicke supported the applicant' s request for R-1 zoning of the property east of the ravine since there will be further opportunity for the City to review plans prior to development. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION TO CHANGE CONDITION NO. 9 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT TO INDICATE THAT THE AREA EAST OF HONEY CREEK RAVINE BE REZONED TO R-1 , WITH THE REST OF THE SENTENCE REMAINING OPERATIVE.* Speaking against the amendment, Chairman Keolker reminded Council members that the subject proposal was submitted prior to adoption of new PUD ordinance; therefore, is being reviewed under old provisions. If the two parcels east of the ravine are rezoned to R-1 instead of G-1 , a potential higher density on the entire site could be calculated due to density shifts allowed under the PUD process. The stability of the site is in question, access is unresolved, and provision of fire and police protection is yet to be determined. Councilman Stredicke felt these concerns can be resolved during future review. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, STREDICKE. 3 NAYS: MATHEWS, KEOLKER, REED. CARRIED. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED. CARRIED. City Attorney Warren clarified that the intent of the motion is to change the wording of Condition No. 9 to reflect that both of the flat parcels east of the ravine zoned R-1 shall have no development without provision of required studies, but G-1 zoned property would retain the same restrictions as well as zoning constraints which allow only one dwelling unit per 35,000 square feet. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Gentry Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $100,000 filed by Beverley for Damages Jean Gentry, 2819 First Avenue, Seattle, alleging false arrest CL 22-86 while picketing at Mark 'N Pak grocery as part of labor union activities (8/3/85) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Stevens Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $3,157 filed by Shirley for Damages Jean Stevens, 4419 South 188th, Seattle, for automobile CL 21-86 damage and physical injury sustained in collision with Renton Police patrol , alleging inadequate use of warning siren/lights 12/4/85) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Building & Personnel Department requested new position, Mechanical Zoning Position Inspector/Combination, for Building & Zoning Department to accommodate increased work load. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Tri-Delt 75% Policy Development Department requested Council set a public Annexation hearing on 5/19/86, to consider the 75% Annexation Petition Petition for the Tri-Delt Annexation, located on the south side of APRIL 14, 1986 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT RE: Appeal of Honey Creek Associates and Appeal of Mitch Murray The Planning and Development Committee met on the appeals of Honey Creek Associates and Mitch Murray, the first meeting being held March 28 , 1986 and the second meeting on April 2 , 1986 . The Planning and Development Committee was primarily concerned about access to the proposed development and the lack of detailed geotechnical information. It was understood that the preliminary planned unit development (PPUD) is conceptual and that the developer must provide detailed geotechnical and engineering information before the final PUD will be approved. In addition, full street improve- ments on a 40 foot public right-of-way alignment with N.E. 23rd are necessary to provide necessary traffic access to the development. It is therefore the Planning and Development Committee ' s recommendation that both appeals be denied and that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and approve the requested zoning for the site subject to the following: 1 . Submission of a final PUD for eventual development of the subject site . 2 . Annexation of the site into the City of Renton; 3 . Dedication of a full 40 foot wide right-of-way aligned with N.E. 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue N.E. and the site with an engineering report and specifications for a full street improvement as required by City Code . 4 . Submission with the final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Building & Zoning and Public Works Departments. The report shall include but not be limited to information regarding: site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their current state; long term implications of the development on erosion potential; geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; site preparation and restoration; and building techniques . 5 . Plans for the final PUD shall be more detailed and provide a description of the usable open space, recreation and building details . 6 . The applicant shall provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. In addition, the applicant shall record covenants running with the land requiring that the slope on the West side of Honey Creek be maintained as closely as is possible in its natural state. 7 . The submission of detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc . 8 . The elimination of the connection and entry of N.E. 21st Street. t/ 9 . The property zoned G-1 shall have no development upon d the property without the City being provided with w detailed geotechnical information regarding the site and site plan or PUD approval . The applicant shall sign and file a restrictive covenant, running with the land, so stating. 10 . This is a conceptual approval of a preliminary planned 3oes not vest in the applicant n/ -c/ ee),rti /1r,t-- ssigns any development rights on LIT -upon recommendation by city staff pe-tictly- t/2/44) ouncil of the geotechnical studies PL"-Y)d 0,0„ G2:=; 1-- attic-f: ebti 6,4A-94%. 400 711tit/ trei'-'7"41"4 (QA"4.1 4 Renton City Council 4/14/86 Page six Consent Agenda continued Tri-Delt 75% SE Renton-Issaquah Road, 600 feet east of Sunset Boulevard Annexation NE and Duvall Avenue NE; also recommended in accordance with continued RCW 35A.14.340 is consideration of departmental recommendation for G-1 zoning on the site. Council concur. Honey creek Policy Development Department requested Council set a public A«ociares_r hearing on 5/12/86, to consider the Honey Creek Associates Annexation,, Rezone, 75% Annexation Petition and associated Rezone, File No. PPUD Hearing R-014-84, and Planned Unit Development, File No. PPUD-015-84, R-014-85 located southeast of NE 27th Street and east of Kirkland PPUD-015-84 Avenue NE in the area known as "Devil ' s Elbow." Council concur. Honey Creek Public Works/Utilities Department requested City-held latecomers Interceptor agreement fee be established for sewer connections to Honey Connection Fee Creek Interceptor. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from J. L. Rankin, Rankin Construction, Rankin Request requesting temporary sewer connection and annexation for for Sewer property located at 10404 SE 166th, Renton, due to septic Connection/ system failure (owner, John Young) ; neighbor Monty Farrell Annexation has agreed to provide easement. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Anti-Abortion Letter was read from Baird M. Bardarson, M.D. , Cedar River Pickets Clinic, 4300 Talbot Road South, requesting police response to anti-abortion picketers trespassing and harrassing patients at the clinic. Response from Mayor Shinpoch indicated that a distinction must be made between outright trespassing and First Amendment guarantees; parking lots, even on private property, have a quasi-public status; and police are instructed to observe, ascertain that demonstrators are not impeding traffic, creating a safety problem, physically denying ingress/access or otherwise breaking the law. Demonstrators will be cited if they engage in unlawful behavior. Playtime Court Card from Velma Evans expressed appreciation to the City for Case pursuing the Playtime court case and providing citizens with useable, lovely Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park as well as Gene Coulon Park other park programs. OLD BUSINESS Council President Mathews presented a Committee of the Whole Committee of report recommending that the Policy Development Department the Whole proceed with negotiations with the City of Tukwila to Renton/Tukwila adjust the Renton/Tukwila boundary line and adopt the eastern Boundary edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way as the Adjustment new boundary line between the two cities. Reasons for the Referred change are: 1 ) Irregular line creates identity confusion for 3/10/86)businesses; 2) Lack of control of development approval process may impact adjacent land use compatibility; 3) Difficulty in providing utilities and public services to area bisected by the railroad. Under the proposal , Tukwila would gain 45 parcels (101 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $14 million. Renton would gain 11 parcels (114 acres) with an assessed value of approximately $3 million. While Renton would initially lose $36,000 per year in 1986 tax dollars, projected development of the Burlington Northern site south of 27th Street West should accrue a tax benefit to Renton in the near future. The cost of two railroad crossing projects, one with the extension of 27th Street West (Strander Boulevard) , and the other on SW 43rd, would be shared equally by the two jurisdictions. OF R• BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR oak O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 9gT O SEP MP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: March 31, 1986 TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: i toger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT:```//HEARING EXAMINER CONDITIONS/HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES/ R-014-84 AND PPUD-015-84 In response to the Planning and Development Committee's request, the specific conditions referred to by the Hearing Examiner in his decision portion of the statement have been taken directly out of the conclusion portion for the Committee's review. Each of those conditions have been referenced to the appropriate conclusion statement below: 1. Per Conclusion #9, Page 10 Final plans would have to be more detailed and provide the realistic open space, recreation, and building details. 2. Per Conclusion #10, Page 10 With the submission of the final PUD, the applicant will have to present a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Building/Zoning and Public Works Departments. The report shall include but not be limited to information regarding: site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their current state; long-term implications of the development on erosion potential; geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; site preparation and restoration; and building techniques. 3. Per Conclusion #11, Page 10 The applicant should be required to provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is ever sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. lanning and Development Committee March 31, 1986 Page 2 4. Per Conclusion 018, Page 11 The PUD proposed by the applicant should be approved subject to the submission of the detailed engineering report, the elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st Street, with covenants requiring the slope on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as close as possible in their natural state and providing a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the property for maintenance purposes. (This . statement is reiterated in recommendation #2.) The Examiner also raises another issue which he does not make a recommendation on. The issue is whether secondary emergency access should be off of N.E. 23rd Street or off of Devil's Elbow. 5. Per Conclusions 013 and 014 Conflicting figures submitted regarding potential road grades do not weigh more heavily for one method over the other. The grades appear comparable. If Devil's Elbow could serve for emergency purposes it should be considered. The Fire Marshal's office has taken a position that the appropriate access is off of N.E. 23rd Street. RJB:ss 2312Z Rentor City Council 3/3/8( Page eight Consert Agenda continued CAG 0E2-85 cont. all required releases have been received. Council concur. Honey Creek Appeals of Hearing Examiner' s recommendation on Honey Creek Associates Rezone Associates Rezone and Preliminary Planned Unit Development and PPUD Appeals filed by Honey Creek Associates and Mitch Murray; File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. Refer to Planning & Development PPUD-015-84 Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE Approved CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Councilwoman Mathews requested an explanation of incomplete engineer' s estimate on item 6.a. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence from Ellen Hansen, King County Division of King C:)unty Records and Elections, requested completion of a questionnaire Voters Pamphlet by March 7th concerning the feasibility of a King County local voters pamphlet to provide voters with information on local ballot measures, candidates or both. The letter advised that if the results of the questionnaire are favorable, the County will appoint a steering committee to evaluate costs, draft an enabling ordinance, and develop implementation procedures. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes reported that due to early deadline, the matter had been discussed this date in Committee. It was MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE THAT THE CITY RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE THAT WE DO NOT COMMIT ANY FUNDS UNTIL WE DETERMINE WHAT THE COSTS ARE. CARRIED. Parking & MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, CORRESPONDENCE FROM Loading Orfdinance WILLIAM T. ROACH, MARKET DEVELOPMENT SUPERVISOR OF METRO, REGARDING PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Metro Transit MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, CORRESPONDENCE FROM Center SCOTT & CATHY HAWKINS, 311 SW LANGSTON ROAD, OPPOSING LOCATION OF METRO TRANSIT CENTER AT 3RD AND SHATTUCK BE REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Community Moved by Mathews, seconded by Reed, correspondence from U. S. Development Senator Slade Gorton regarding Senate Bill 2074, legislation Block Crant to disapprove deferral of Community Development Block Grant Funds funding, be referred to Transportation Committee. Motion withdrawn after Mayor Shinpoch reported that she has already written to Senator Gordon supporting the bill . It was then MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN SENATOR GORTON 'S EFFORTS TO RE-ESTABLISH AND DEFEND THE H & CD FUNDING IN THE PRESIDENT' S BUDGET. CARRIED. Mayor Shinpoch indicated a letter of support will be drafted for Council ' s signature. OLD BUSINES Referencing Council action of 2/24/86 to direct the City Attorney Arlene Rob its not to pursue restrictive covenants for the Emilio Pierotti Rezone property (Arlene Roberts Rezone, File No. R-032-85) until R-032-85 after the Valley Rezone is approved, it was MOVED BY MATHEWS, Emilio Pierotti - SECONDED BY KEOLKER, BUILDING PERMIT NOT BE ISSUED FOR THE Peppermint Pony PIEROTTI PROPERTY UNDER L-1 ZONING UNTIL RESTRICTIVE Daycare Center COVENANTS HAVE BEEN EXECUTED BY ALL PARTIES CONCERNED. CARRIED. Site Plan Planning and Development Committee Chairman Keolker announced Review Ordinance that the report regarding Site Plan Review Ordinance will be held until next Council meeting. She thanked all Council members for courteous demeanor during controversial discussion on the Valley Rezone. ORDINANiES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second & final reading: Ordinance #3976 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 14 of Title IV (Building Comprehensive Regulations) relating to the Comprehensive Plan Compendium Plan Compendium including adoption, purpose, plan elements, and implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, I For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk For Agenda Of 3/3/86 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Maxine E. Motor Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Two Appeals of Hearing Examiner's Consent XX Recommendation on Honey Creek Associates Public Hearing Correspondence Rezone and Pr Iiminary Planned Unit Ordinance/Resolution Development, I -014-84 and PPUD-015-84 Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. City Clerk's Letter Hendrickson Appeal, 1 /30/86 Other B. Murray Appeal, 2/19/86 Murray Request for Reconsideration/ResponseApproval : C. Hearing Examiner's Report. 1 /17/86 Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A_ COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A_ Planning & Development Committee Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Appal filed by John L. Hendrickson, representing Honey Creek Associates, accompanied by required fee received on 1 /30/86. Appeal filed by Mitch Murray accompanied by required fee received on 2/19/86. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF RAAA 0 © o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING Z00 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 o- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 O P 9 rFD SEPIE O February 20, 1986 Re: Appeals of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation on HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. To Parties of Record : Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton City Code, two written appeals have been filed in a timely manner with the City Clerk, accompanied by the required $75.00 fees. Each of the appeals, filed on January 30, 1986 by John Hendrickson, attorney for Honey Creek Associates, and on February 19, 1986 by Mitch Murray, private citizen, will be referred to the Council's Planning and Development Committee for review. The entire City Council will consider these matters when they are reported out of Committee. Within the next few weeks, the Council Secretary will call all parties of record with information regarding the scheduling of the Planning and Development Committee. If you are not listed in local telephone directories, please take a moment to call the secretary at 235-2586 to obtain the time and date of the meeting. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON e Maxine E. Motor City Clerk CITY OF RENTON No 15016 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON/ 98055 l 19 RECEIVED OF C e_ zte' l- -lrC.C't e c-'c)(.) L' Received by t(jVV.)t-, L - TOTAL CITY OF RENTON FEB 1:9 1906.,t Lan,CLERK'S OFFICE r e• OF ', y 7 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o ea rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 94 o CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501091' Eo SEPT: 05 February 20, 1986 Re: Appeals of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation on HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES REZONE AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. To Parties of Record : Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton City Code, two written appeals have been filed in a timely manner with the City Clerk, accompanied by the required $75. 00 fees. Each of the appeals, filed on January 30, 1986 by John Hendrickson, attor ey for Honey Creek Associates, and on February 19, 1986 by Mitch Murray, private citizen, will be referred to the Council's Planning and evelopment Committee for review. The entire City Council will consider these matters when they are reported out of Committee. Withi the next few weeks, the Council Secretary will call all parties of r ord with information regarding the scheduling of the Planning and Devel pment Committee. If you are not listed in local telephone directories, pleas take a moment to call the secretary at 235-2586 to obtain the time and ate of the meeting. Sincerely, CI TY OF RENTON e-t.--t- Maxine E. Motor City Clerk February 18, 1986, Murray to Renton City Clerk, D-015-84, R-014-84 From. Mitch Murray 1 2813 NE 23rd Place Renton, Washington 98056 UV OF RE1TON FEB i'9 1986 ' To: Renton City Clerk j CI[ TYCLER)cSOFHCJE 200 Mill Avenue South n __: C—1.iE..i. 1UL: Renton, Washington 98055 Regarding: Hearing Examiner's Report dated 17 January 1986, Honey Creek Associates File No. R-014-84 & PPUD-015-84 I hereby file Notice of Appeal , to the Renton City Council , with regard to the facts , conclusions and recommendations contained within the Report and Recorrmendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner dated January 17, 1986 regarding the Honey Creek area rezone and PPUD. Summary of Appeal 1 . I request that the Hearing Examiner's recommendation No. 1 be modified to recommend that the zoning for the proposed R-1 , L-shaped, 8.1 acre region in the southwest corner of the site be changed to G-1 zoning. This is appropriate in view of the fact that of this 8.1 acres, more than half is sloped more than 40% as shown in the 'Honey Creek Appeal ' letter to the Renton City Clerk from M. Murray dated April 3,1985. In addition it is premature to zone this class III , 8.1 acre area for R-1 development without first having a detailed, geotechnical report showing that it is practical to build on. The allowable PPUD unit count should be lowered due to this zone change. 2. I re uest that the Hearing Examiner's recommendation No. 2. be changed to a rec )mm ndation of a denial of the PPUD. A denial is appropriate in view of: the lack of documentation regarding plans for dealing with the poor soil stabilit of the area; the class III nature of the soils in the area which may make it impractical to provide access to the area and also may make it impracti al to locate the proposed apartment units in there proposed location; and the lack of an emergency access for fire vehicles that satisfie minimum width standards. page 1 February 18, 1986, ri. Murray to Renton City Clerk, r'vuD-015-84, R-014-84 Errors of Fact, Conclusion, Code Conformance or Recommendation 1 . Err r of Fact: Page 2, paragraph three, sentence four states: ". . .4 acre o the 14.06 has slopes in excess of 15%. " Actually 8.8 acres of the 14.06 acres has slopes in excess of 15% as shown in the 'Honey Creek Arithmetic Error' letter to the City Council from M. Murray dated April 22,185. 2. Error of Conclusion: Regarding conclusion number 9, sentence number 3, which sates: The 72 units would not produce substantially more traffic than a single family neighborhood. " The above sentence is incorrect. The public record contains a letter from M. Murray to the City of Renton Hearing Examiner, dated February 26, 1985. Attachment J of this letter shows a typical plat map for this area as would be used if it were developed as a single family neighborhood. Also shown on the attachment is the location of land areas where the slope is more than 40%. As shown or} the attachment only about 22 single family R-1 lots can be fitted into the south western area. The number of lots that can be fitted is severely restricted by: minimum lot area and lot width requirements, the loss of land area needed for local streets, and the fact that a substantial portion of the land area is sloped over 40% and is therefore unbuildable. Thus conclusion number 9, sentence number 3 should be modified to read something like : lhe ,proposed 72 units would produce more traffic than a single family rei0hborhood. (Approximately 22 homes is the maximum that could be dev loped based on underlying R-1 zoning due to the severe topography). page 2 February 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, ipuD-015-84, R-014-84 3. Error of Conclusion: Conclusion number 10 should be changed. The conclusion recommends that a detailed geotechnical analysis be obtained for the site as part of the final PUD. I believe that it is in public interest and 1:he 'developers interest to require that this report be provided before the PPUD concept is approved. The area is classified as class III (which is the most severe class) in all three land stability categories (land slide, erosion, and earthquake) in the King County Sensitive Areas Map Folio. The proposed western access roadway, which is an extension of Jefferson Ave NE, and the southern access roadway both traverse Class III hillsides that are sloped more than 40%. The pro osal indicates that the western access roadway is to be build to city standar s which requires a pavement width of a minimum of 32ft. and a total width with sidewalks of 50ft. It seems likely that, from an engineering standpoint, it may be impractical to build such a road. This roadway, in comb- nation with NE 23rd street, is the proposed emergency access to the development. If it is impractical to build the roadway, then the proposed PPUD would lack emergency access and would have to be altered to use Devil 's Elboe fir access or be denied. The southern access roadway is shown as being build to driveway standards at 24ft. i width. It will probably be easier to build than the western roadway due i;o it's lesser width, however it also traverses a class III hillside sloped more than 40% which may be impractical to build. If it is impractical to buil this roadway, then the proposed PPUD would have to be altered to use Devil 's Elboe or be denied. In view of the importance of these two roadways to the viability of the propose PPUD, and in view of the class III conditions of the area, it is only prudent and in the interest of all concerned, to establish if is safe and practical to build them as early in the approval process as practical . Thus a page 3 February 18, 1986, H. Murray to Renton City Clerk, rruU-015-84, R-014-84 detailed geotechnical engineering report, including stability of the proposed western and southern roadbeds, along with design details of the road construction, should be required before this PPUD is granted. This current proposed PPUD concept does not make sense without documented safe and practical access. Furt[ermore, as proposed the location of the apartment units A, B, C, E, F, H and ] are all within approximately loft of the edge of class III hillsides sloped more than 40%. It may be impractical to locate these units in their proposed locations. In sLmmary, it is clear that the practicality and viability of the PPUD is critically tied to the condition of the underlying soils. Thus it is prudent to rEquire detailed geotechnical studies before a PPUD concept, or any development concept for this area, is considered or approved. 4. Error of Conclusion: Conclusion number 14, sentence number 7 and 8, state: Jefferson could provide the primary access point and N.E. 23rd could remain a gated emergency approach to the site. (Although this Office would like to be informed of the authority to waive the minimum width Standards for an emergency access and what criteria were utilized)." I believe that one of the most important functions of city government is to provide and enforce safety rules. The Uniform Fire Code is clear with regard to minimum standards for access roadways for fire apparatus. A driving surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width is the minimum stancard. Allowing a development concept to proceed, without it meeting minimum fire protEction standards, is a very bad precedent and is certainly not in the public interest. page 4 February 18, 198t,, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, rrUD-015-84, R-014-84 20 feet of pavement width cannot be provided on NE 23rd street due to the limited overall right of way of only 20ft and the bulkhead/rockery requirements that must fit within this 20ft. In addition an emergency access at NE 23rd street, whether gated or not, would be a safety hazard and an eye sore to the adjacent single family neighborhood, due to the high bulkheads required on this proposed roadway and the corresponding disruption of the local topography. Therefore NE 23rd street should not be considered for emergency access. 5. Lack of Conformance to Renton Code. Renton Code section 4-2709,4,C states: C. Geologic Hazard or Flooding. Development of areas on or near sites where landslides or flooding have been known to occur or may reasonably be expected to occur shall be subject to Section 9-1108 18 of the City Code entitled 'Plat Improvements and Development Standards ' . " Section 9-1108,18 states: 18. Flooding and Geological Hazard. If any portion of the land within the boundary of a preliminary plat or approved record or survey is subject to flooding or inundation, that portion of the subdivision shall have the approval of the State of Washington according to RWC 86.16 before the Building Department and the Hearing Examiner shall consider such subdivision. If any portion of a preliminary plat is subject to flooding, inundation or geological hazard and the probable use of the property will require structures, the Hearing Examiner shall disapprove the preliminary plat or that portion of the subdivision so affected. Protective improvements may be constructed as a conditional precedent to approval of the preliminary/final plat. The Building Department may require the subdivider to submit a geologist's report if there is concern about geological hazards. " page 5 Fobruary 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, PPUD-015-84, R-014-84 The i;urtent proposed PPUD should be disapproved because there is no documen ation showing approval by the State of Washington under RCW 86.16, and protect ve improvements have not been presented, and a geologist's report has not begin submitted. This area is class III (the severest class) in land;,lile, erosion and earthquake damage potential , therefore it is prudent to require this documentation before PPUD approval . 6. Lack of Conformance to Renton Code. Section 4-2709,1 ,A states: A. Subdivision Requirements. If land or structures within a proposed planned unit development are to be sold to more than one person, partnership, firm or corporation or are to include the dedication of land, then the proposed planned unit development shall be subject to the short cr major subdivision proceedings in addition to the requirements of this Section. " The r::ur'ent proposed PPUD includes a dedication of 0.85 acres. Therefore it must be subject to the subdivision proceedings in addition to the PPUD proceedings. There is no documentation to indicate that this was accomplished. The subdivision proceedings would involve a public hearing. The current proposed PPUD should be denied since the subdivision proceedings have not been completed. 7. Lrror in Recommendation. Recommendation number 2. states: 1pp.ove the PPUD subject to the submission of the detailed engineering epgrt, the elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st, provide ovenants requiring the slopes on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as close as possible in their natural state, and providing a slo a easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property for maintenance pur oses. " page 6 February 18, 1986, Murray to Renton City Clerk, , . JD-015-84, R-014-84 The above recommendation should be changed to recommend a denial of the PPUD as proposed. A denial is appropriate in view of the lack of documentation regarding soil stability, the class III nature of the soils in the area which may make it impractical to provide access to the area, and the lack of an emergency access for fire vehicles that satisfies minimum safety standards. Sincerely, Mitch Murray page 7 WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. R— (41F S9- PP4/D —O)5(51- IIEA- >NG max' /'1/NE/e Is /4Ere N°'vEy c RE&k efl-TE uf}R '( /7) 1,8( The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated J ikiNJ(-1 /1 R Y I7 19 S6. 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE ( IF ANY) : Name: n/7.c/71 41elA /e/{ Y Name: --- Address: 28/3 NE 23Rb PL Address: R E sv rcw uy 4 t3 c)5-6 Telephone No. 2 3 7 —8 OS 7 Telephone No. 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: 5EL ATT/.Cl-tab FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner' s Report) No. Error: Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. Error: Correction: OTHER: CITY OF FET ONarROM2037iiNo. Error: FEB18 Ner IS DFr(1)11-H, o,NN3a JO A113 Correction:ij 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: SEE ffT rAc/f EIS LETTER X Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: SE. f4TTAC1i Eb IX-- FEW Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: 71,l 9 F&$/9gt) Appellant/Representati.i Signature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. 4-3016:APP : Unless an ordinance providing for re of decision of the Exar r requires review thereof by the Superic curt, any interested '"Y party aggrieved by the Examiner's written decision or recommendation may submit a notice of appeal to the City Clerk upon a form furnished by the City Clerk, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the Examiner's written report. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a fee in accordance with the Fee Schedule oftheCity. A) The written notice of appeal shall fully, clearly and thoroughly specify the substantial error(s) in fact or law which exist in the record of the proceedings from which the appellant seeks relief. B) Within five (5) days of receipt of the notice of appeal, the City Clerk shall notify all parties of record of the receipt of the appeal. Other parties of record may submit letters in support of their positions within ten (10) days of the dates of mailing of the notification of the filing of the notice of appeal. C) Thereupon the Clerk shall forward to the members of the City Council all of the pertinent documents, including the written decision or recommendation, findings and conclusions contained in the Examiner's report, the notice of appeal, and additional letters submitted by the parties. D) No public hearing shall be held by the City Council. No new or additional evidence or testimony shall be accepted by the City Council unless a showing is made by the party offering the evidence that the evidence could not reasonably have been available at the time of the hearing before the Examiner. If the Council determines that additional evidence is required, the CouncilmayremandthemattertotheExaminerforreconsideration. The cost of transcription of the hearing record shall be borne by the appellant. In the absence of an entry upon the record of an order by the City Council authorizing new or additional evidence or testimony, it shall be presumed that no new or additional evidence or testimony has been accepted by the City Council, and that the record before the City Council is identical to the hearing record before the Hearing Examiner. E) The consideration by the City Council shall be based solely upon the record, the Hearing Examiner's report, the notice of appeal and additional submissions by parties. F) If, upon appeal of a decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-3010(A) and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, it may remand the proceeding to Examiner for reconsideration, or modify, or reverse the decision of the Examiner accordingly. G) If, upon appeal from a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner upon an application submitted pursuant to Section 4-3010(B) or (C), and after examination of the record, the Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law exists in the record, or that a recommendation of the Hearing Examiner should be disregarded or modified, the City Council may remand the proceeding to the Examiner for reconsideration, or enter its own decisionupontheapplicationpursuanttoSection4-3010(B) or (C). H) In any event, the decision of the City Council shall be in writing and shall specify any modified or amended findings and conclusions other than those set forth in the report of the Hearing Examiner. Each material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The burden of proof shallrestwiththeappellant. (Ord. 3658, 9-13-82) 4-3017:COUNCIL ACTION: Any application requiring action by theCityCouncilshallbeevidencedbyminuteentryunlessotherwiserequired by law. When taking any such final action, the Council shall make and enter findingsoffactfromtherecordandconclusionstherefromwhichsupportitsaction. Unlessotherwisespecified, the City Council shall be presumed to have adoptedtheExaminer's findings and conclusions. A) In the case of a change of the zone classification of property (rezone), theCityClerkshallplacetheordinanceontheCouncil's agenda for first reading. Final reading of the ordinance shall not occur until all conditions, restrictions or modifications which may have been required by the Council have been accomplished or provisions for compliance made to the satisfaction oftheLegalDepartment. B) All other applications requiring Council action shall be placed on the Council's agenda for consideration. (Ord. 3454, 7-28-80) C) The action of the Council approving, modifying'or rejecting a decision of the Examiner, shall be final and conclusive, unless within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the action an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of review from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, forpurposesofreviewoftheactiontaken. (Ord. 3725, 5-9-83) February 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, PPUD-015-84, R-014-84 From: Mitch Murray 2813 NE 23rd Place Renton, Washington 98056 CITY OF RENTON FEB 1:819881 To: Renton City Clerk i CITY CLERKS O 200 Mill Avenue South FFICE Renton, Washington 98055 l L w U Regarding: Hearing Examiner 's Report dated 17 January 1986, Honey Creek Associates File No. R-014-84 & PPUD-015-84 I hereby file Notice of Appeal , to the Renton City Council , with regard to the facts, conclusions and recommendations contained within the Report and Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner dated January 17, 1986 regarding the Honey Creek area rezone and PPUD. Sunrrary of Appeal 1 . I request that the Hearing Examiner's recommendation No. 1 be modified to reccmmend that the zoning for the proposed R-1 , L-shaped, 8.1 acre region in the southwest corner of the site be changed to G-1 zoning. This is appropriate in view of the fact that of this 8.1 acres, more than half is sloped more than 40% as shown in the 'Honey Creek Appeal ' letter to the Renton City Clerk from M. Murray dated April 3,1985. In addition it is premature to zone this class III , 8.1 acre area for R-1 development without first having a detailed geotechnical report showing that it is practical to build on. The allowable PPUD unit count should be lowered due to this zone change. 2. I request that the Hearing Examiner's recommendation No. 2. be changed to a recommendation of a denial of the PPUD. A denial is appropriate in view of: the lack of documentation regarding plans for dealing with the poor soil stability of the area; the class III nature of the soils in the area which may make it impractical to provide access to the area and also may make it impractical to locate the proposed apartment units in there proposed locations; and the lack of an emergency access for fire vehicles that satisfies minimum width standards. page 1 February 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, PPUD-015-84, R-014-84 Errors of Fact, Conclusion, Code Conformance or Recommendation 1 . Error of Fact: Page 2, paragraph three, sentence four states: ". . .4 acres of the 14.06 has slopes in excess of 15%. " Actually 8.8 acres of the 14.C6 acres has slopes in excess of 15% as shown in the 'Honey Creek Arithmetic Error' letter to the City Council from M. Murray dated April 22,1985. 2. Error of Conclusion: Regarding conclusion number 9, sentence number 3, which states: The 72 units would not produce substantially more traffic than a single family neighborhood. " The above sentence is incorrect. The public record contains a letter from M. Murray to the City of Renton Hearing Examiner, dated February 26, 1985. Attachment J of this letter shows a typical plat map for this area as would be usecl if it were developed as a single family neighborhood. Also shown on the attachment is the location of land areas where the slope is more than 40%. As shovrn on the attachment only about 22 single family R-1 lots can be fitted into the south western area. The number of lots that can be fitted is sevErely restricted by: minimum lot area and lot width requirements, the loss of land area needed for local streets, and the fact that a substantial portion of the land area is sloped over 40% and is therefore unbuildable. Thus conclusion number 9, sentence number 3 should be modified to read something like: The proposed 72 units would produce more traffic than a single family neighborhood. (Approximately 22 homes is the maximum that could be developed based on underlying R-1 zoning due to the severe topography). page 2 Fobruary 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, PPUD-015-84, R-014-84 3. Error of Conclusion: Conclusion number 10 should be changed. The conclusion recommends that a detailed geotechnical analysis be obtained for the site as part of the final PUD. I believe that it is in public interest and the developers interest to require that this report be provided before the PPUD concept is approved. The area is classified as class III (which is the most severe class) in all three land stability categories (land slide, erosion, and earthquake) in the King County Sensitive Areas Map Folio. The proposed western access roadway, whicn is an extension of Jefferson Ave NE, and the southern access roadway both traverse Class III hillsides that are sloped more than 40%. The proposal indicates that the western access roadway is to be build to city stardards which requires a pavement width of a minimum of 32ft. and a total width with sidewalks of 50ft. It seems likely that, from an engineering stardpoint, it may be impractical to build such a road. This roadway, in combination with NE 23rd street, is the proposed emergency access to the development. If it is impractical to build the roadway, then the proposed PPUD would lack emergency access and would have to be altered to use Devil 's Elboe for access or be denied. The southern access roadway is shown as being build to driveway standards at 24ft . in width. It will probably be easier to build than the western roadway due to it's lesser width, however it also traverses a class III hillside sloped more than 40% which may be impractical to build. If it is impractical to build this roadway, then the proposed PPUD would have to be altered to use Devil 's Elboe or be denied. In View of the importance of these two roadways to the viability of the proposed PPUD, and in view of the class III conditions of the area, it is only prudent and in the interest of all concerned, to establish if is safe and practical to build them as early in the approval process as practical . Thus a page 3 February 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, PPUD-015-84, R-014-84 detailed geotechnical engineering report, including stability of the proposed western and southern roadbeds, along with design details of the road construction, should be required before this PPUD is granted. This current proposed PPUD concept does not make sense without documented safe and practical access. Furthermore, as proposed the location of the apartment units A, B, C, E, F, H and I are all within approximately loft of the edge of class III hillsides sloped more than 40%. It may be impractical to locate these units in their proposed locations. In summary, it is clear that the practicality and viability of the PPUD is critically tied to the condition of the underlying soils. Thus it is prudent to require detailed geotechnical studies before a PPUD concept, or any development concept for this area, is considered or approved. 4. Error of Conclusion: Conclusion number 14, sentence number 7 and 8, state: Jefferson could provide the primary access point and N.E. 23rd could remain a gated emergency approach to the site. (Although this Office would like to be informed of the authority to waive the minimum width standards for an emergency access and what criteria were utilized). " I believe that one of the most important functions of city government is to provide and enforce safety rules. The Uniform Fire Code is clear with regard to minimum standards for access roadways for fire apparatus. A driving surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width is the minimum standard. Allowing a development concept to proceed, without it meeting minimum fire protection standards, is a very bad precedent and is certainly not in the pub" ic interest. page 4 February 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, PPUD-015-84, R-014-84 20 feet of pavement width cannot be provided on NE 23rd street due to the limited overall right of way of only 20ft and the bulkhead/rockery requirements that must fit within this 20ft. In addition an emergency access at NE 23rd street, whether gated or not, would be a safety hazard and an eye sore to the adjacent single family neighborhood, due to the high bulkheads required on this proposed roadway and the corresponding disruption of the local topography. Therefore NE 23rd street should not be considered for emergency access. 5. Lack of Conformance to Renton Code. Renton Code section 4-2709,4,C states: C. Geologic Hazard or Flooding. Development of areas on or near sites where landslides or flooding have been known to occur or may reasonably be expected to occur shall be subject to Section 9-1108 18 of the City Code entitled 'Plat Improvements and Development Standards ' . " Section 9-1108,18 states: 18. Flooding and Geological Hazard. If any portion of the land within the boundary of a preliminary plat or approved record or survey is subject to flooding or inundation, that portion of the subdivision shall have the approval of the State of Washington according to RWC 86.16 before the Building Department and the Hearing Examiner shall consider such subdivision. If any portion of a preliminary plat is subject to flooding, inundation or geological hazard and the probable use of the property will require structures, the Hearing Examiner shall disapprove the preliminary plat or that portion of the subdivision so affected. Protective improvements may be constructed as a conditional precedent to approval of the preliminary/final plat. The Building Department may require the subdivider to submit a geologist' s report if there is concern about geological hazards. " page 5 February 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, PPUD-015-84, R-014-84 The current proposed PPUD should be disapproved because there is no documentation showing approval by the State of Washington under RCW 86.16, and protective improvements have not been presented, and a geologist's report has not been submitted. This area is class III (the severest class) in landslide, erosion and earthquake damage potential , therefore it is prudent to require this documentation before PPUD approval . 6. Lack of Conformance to Renton Code. Section 4-2709,1 ,A states: A. Subdivision Requirements. If land or structures within a proposed planned unit development are to be sold to more than one person, partnership, firm or corporation or are to include the dedication of land, then the proposed planned unit development shall be subject to the short cr major subdivision proceedings in addition to the requirements of this Section. " The current proposed PPUD includes a dedication of 0.85 acres. Therefore it must be subject to the subdivision proceedings in addition to the PPUD proceedings. There is no documentation to indicate that this was accomplished. The subdivision proceedings would involve a public hearing. The current proposed PPUD should be denied since the subdivision proceedings have not been completed. 7. Error in Recommendation. Recommendation number 2. states: Approve the PPUD subject to the submission of the detailed engineering report, the elimination of the connection and entry at H.E. 21st, provide covenants requiring the slopes on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as close as possible in their natural state, and providing a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property for maintenance purposes. " page 6 February 18, 1986, M. Murray to Renton City Clerk, PPUD-015-84, R-014-84 The above recommendation should be changed to recommend a denial of the PPUD as proposed. A denial is appropriate in view of the lack of documentation regarding soil stability, the class III nature of the soils in the area which may make it impractical to provide access to the area, and the lack of an emergency access for fire vehicles that satisfies minimum safety standards. Sincerely, Mitch Murray page 7 pF 1 o THE CITY OF RENTON U `Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0, 9gT6-0 SEP-CE‘ O January 31, 1986 STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING MARILYN J. PETERSEN, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. On this 31st day of January, 1986, at 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail, to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON FOR HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. Marilyn J . et sen, Deputy Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 31st day of January, 1986. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in King County OF R o THE CITY OF RENTON U 4 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, n 0 9 co- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0, 9gTF0 SEPIE- O January 31, 1986 APPEAL FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON FOR HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation, dated January 17, 1986, Honey Creek Associates Rezone and Preliminary Planned Unit Development, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. To Parties of Record : Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation has been filed with the City Clerk, accompanied by the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories, please take it upon your self to call the secretary at 235-2586. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk OF R 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 0 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 o9, TEQ SEP1E e P January 31, 1986 APPEAL FILED BY JOHN L. HENDRICKSON FOR HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Recommendation, dated January 17, 1986, Honey Creek Associates Rezone and Preliminary Planned Unit Development, File No. R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84. To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Hearing Examiner's recommendation has been filed with the City Clerk, accompanied by the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. The Council Secretary will notify all parties of record of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories, please take it upon your self to call the secretary at 235-2586. Sincerely, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk SH I TILER McBROOM GATES& LAJCAS Seattle ATTORNEYS AT LAW•A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION Bellevue 3500 First Interstate Center 505 Honeywell Center Seattle,Washington 98104 6001081h Ave.N.E. lelephune(206)223-464k) Bellevue,Washington 98004 1elecopter(206)622-5110 Telephone(206)453-0300 telex 29-2988 Telecopier(206)455-9166 January 29, 1986 JOHN L.HENDRICKSON Bellevue Office Renton City Council c/o City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Honey Creek Associates (R-014-84)/Notice of Appeal Dear Council Members: On behalf of the applicant with regard to the above referenced matter, we hereby respectfully request that the City Council set a date for an appeal hearing with regard to the decision of the hearing examiner dated January 17, 1986. This appeal pertains only to that portion of the examiner's decision which pertains to the rezone application. The appeal fee of $75.00 is enclosed. The applicant's rezone request proposed that the Phase II portion of the property, approximately the eastern half of the site, be rezoned to a combination of R-1 and G-1 zoning. The examiner has recommended that this portion of the subject property be rezoned exclusively to the G-1 zone and his recommendation does not include any R-1 zoning in this area. The Council members are respectfully requested to consider the following errors with regard to the recommendation on the rezone application: 1. The change in the recommendation is inconsistent with the original recommendation of the examiner, without there being any significant change in the evidence that is in the record. In the March 4, 1985 recommendation, the hearing examiner concluded that the areas of proposed R-1 zoning "appear generally compatible with similar single family designations made in the Comprehensive Plan. The largest area is in the northeast quadrant of the parcel and abuts either single family uses in King County or other undeveloped parcels to the north. It encompasses the larger of the two plateaus on the subject site. This district would be a logical extension of the single family uses located east of the site, although not an extension at this time of a Renton single family area." 2. The recommended change in the zoning by the examiner is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the remand as established by the City Council. The original remand by the Council was for the purpose of having the examiner review the new information and evidence relating to the PPUD. The rezone was remanded solely due to the fact that there was a question regarding the notice for the prior hearing and also the desire of the Council to keep cc fir vlaiTON rIAN 3 0 1986 IiY CLFRK_S OFFICE_) Renton City Council January 29, 1986 Page Two the PPUD and rezone together in the process (please see attached City Council minutes). 3. There is no substantial evidence in the record which establishes that the eastern portion of the subject property contains any hazardous soils conditions which warrant that the site be zoned G-1. The R-1 zones are proposed for the areas generally around the plateaus in the eastern portion of the property, as was recognized by the examiner in the above quoted portion of the March 4, 1985 recommendation. It is anticipated that the residential development in Phase II will be clustered in the plateau area, thus avoiding the steeper slopes where soils conditions may be more sensitive. 4. Soils analysis is a development related issue and should not be a zoning related issue. At such time as a development proposal is considered by the City, it would be prudent for both the City and the applicant to analyze further the soils conditions in the eastern portion of the property. However, this issue is unrelated to zoning and it is evident that the proposed R-1 zoning for the eastern portion meets the zoning criteria as set forth in the initial recommendation of the hearing examiner. 5. Denial of R-1 zoning for the eastern portion of the site is inconsistent with the policy directives of the comprehensive plan for this area. The Plan map clearly designates R-1 zoning for the general areas in the eastern portion of the property that the applicant has proposed to rezone to R-1. For the foregoing reasons, the applicant respectfully requests that the Council reverse the hearing examiner's determination with regard to the zoning application and that the rezone application be approved as submitted. Very Truly Yours, SHIDLER McBROOM GATES Ilk . LU S Jo n L. Hendrickson JLH:st 016 Enclosures cc: Mr. Bob Tomberg, Honey Creek Associates Mr. Mel Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group Reriton City Council 5/6/85 Page two Public Hearing continued Dochnahl 75% He reported a request of the Fire Prevention BureauforAnnexationPetition/ dedication of a 30-foot strip on the west side of136thBales-Denton Rezone Avenue SE to provide emergency vehicle access; andsuggestedcontinuedinclusionoftherequirementinthelanguageoftheordinance approving the annexation. As an alternative, dedicationcouldberequiredforanyfuturedevelopment. Mr. Munson reiterated the departmental recommendation for approvalofboththeannexationandrezone; and establishment of a second public hearing on 6/3/85. Continuedi Upon inquiry, City Attorney Warren advised the Council right to deny the rezone at any point in the process up toadoptionoftherezoneordinance. Policy Development DirectorSpringerindicatedthatthroughthesimultaneousreviewprocess, several options exist for approval of both the annexation and rezone, denial of both, or approval of the annexation and denialoftherezone. Regarding questions concerning access, he also reported that the Examiner had given thorough consideration to proposed access to the south of the McCann property andtheproposalforadditionalright-of-way. Continuec! David Sitzman, 13024 SE 72nd Place, Renton, representingthepetitioners, spoke in favor of both the annexation and rezone. He felt the proposed developments are consistent withdevelopmentintheareaandanaturalextensionofCityboundaries. Heindicatedthatthroughanoversight, owners of Lots 2 and3hadnotappealedConditionNo. 2 imposed by the Examiner-- joint access agreement between the two lots requiredbyrestrictivecovenant. City Attorney Warren confirmed thattheappealperiodfortheExaminer 's report has expired. Mr. Sitzman noted that King County zoning for Parcels 3 and4allowsbusinessuse; however, office park development as proposed would have less impact on traffic andsurroundingareas. Continued Dennis Dochnahl , 10406 129th SE, owner of Lot 2, objected to the referenced joint access agreement since it wouldviolateanexistingleaseheldwithadjacentOldNationalBank, andwouldbeunacceptabletobothparties. Upon inquiry, Mr. Springer reported that if the annexation was approved andtherezonedenied, G-1 (General) zoning would be applied, and existing businesses would be classified as legal non-conforming uses since they conform to existing King County zoning categories. He also noted that rezone conditions for Lots 1 and 4 are acceptable to the proponents, and suggested that access questions on Lots 2 and 3 could be reconsidered bytheExaminer. City Attorney Warren advised that the Councilisempoweredtoaccept, reject, or modify the Hearing Examiner 's recommendation, or remand all or part of therecommendationbacktotheExaminer. Mr. Springer suggested that staff review the access question and offer solutions at the secondpublichearing. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCILCLOSETHEPUBLICHEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDEDBYCLYMER, COUNCIL SET SECOND PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 3, 1985,FOR CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNEXATION AND REZONE, AND DIRECT STAFF TO ADDRESS ITEM 2 OF THE EXAMINER'SREPORTREGARDINGACCESS. CARRIED. Visitors Mayor Shinpoch welcomed former Councilwoman Margaret Proctor,Welcomed and exchange students from South Africa and Denmark. Advance to MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPENDTHEOldBusinessREGULARORDEROFBUSINESSANDADVANCETOPLANNING & DEVELOPMENTCOMMITTEEREPORTSUNDEROLDBUSINESS. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman StredickepresentedDevelopmentareportregardingtheappealsfiledbytheapplicantandCommitteecitizenMitchMurrayonHoneyCreekAssociatesRezone (R-014-84)oney r and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD-015-84) . TheAssociate;,proposal , consisting of 47.7 acres located in the vicinityofB4the2200blockofJeffersonAvenueNE, is for rezone from G-1PPUD-o1544 to R-1 and R-2 to allow a two-phase multifamilydevelopmentAppealsconsistingof185units. The Hearing Examiner had approved the Renton City Council 5/6/85 Page three Planning and Development Committee Report continued Planning and rezone and denied the PPUD on 3/4/85. The Committee hasDevelopnentconsideredtheappealsandalongwithothermembersoftheCommitteeCouncilhasreceivedcorrespondenceregardingthismatterHoneyCreekfromcitizens. This correspondence has been filed intheAssociatesAppealsrecordoftheproceedingandallpartieshavebeengivenancontinuedopportunitytorebutthesubstance. Continued Questions have been raised regarding the adequacy of the notice given of the hearing before the Hearing Examiner, particularly to residents living in King County who were parties of record to the 10% annexation proceeding under concurrent review by the City. In addition, the developer has presented new evidence of the existence of two separate tax parcels which would consist of legal "lots" as that term is defined in CityCodeSection4-702 (L) (4) . This new evidence may have bearing upon the matters at issue in the entire application, butparticularlywithregardtotheallowabledensitypursuanttothesteepslopeformulasetforthinSection4-2709(4) (B) (2) . Continued Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council remand both applications encompassed within this appeal to the Hearing Examiner for reconsideration in light of the new evidence regarding the methodology for computation for the steep slope formula , as thus calculated. The Committee further recommended that the City Council request that theHearingExaminerholdanotherpublichearing, and in addition to City Code requirements for legal notice, notice of the hearing be mailed to all parties of record in this and the annexation proceeding. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Councilwoman Mathews requested that public notice be posted in several places on the east side of the property to alert King County residents of the hearing. CARRIED. John Hendrickson, Suite 505, Honeywell Center, Bellevue, attorney for the applicant, requested that the rezone not be remanded to the Examiner since there was no showing that an error in fact or law had been made and the rezone area complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site. Mayor Shinpoch explained rationale for remand of both applications , rezone and PPUD, to allow appropriate notice to all parties of record and King County residents adjacent to the site. Chairman Stredicke expressed opinion of the Committee that the rezone should not be separated from the PPUD in the review process. Continued Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE #2, Bellevue, Honey Creek Associates, explained diligent efforts to cooperate with City staff and meet City Code requirements in preparing plans, studies, and other data as requested by staff. He claimed that concerns expressed by the Committee have already been raised and addressed through the review process. The first, access, wasthoroughlyaddressed, a traffic study was prepared outlining multi-access alternatives, and the ERC had declared the access as non- significant. The second, R-2 zoning surrounded by R-1 , was determined to be the most environmentally sound. Third, proposed density of 182 units, or four units per acre, is less than allowed by any other zone. Fourth, the concerns over the steep slope can be addressed through PUD review and need not be addressed during rezone review. Mr. Tomberg requested approval of the rezone in lieu of remanding it to the Hearing Examiner , enabling density to be defined for the PUD. Continued Councilwoman Mathews noted that the applicant had chosen the concurrent review process for annexation, rezone, and PUD. Normally, each application is reviewed and approved separately during a much lengthier process. She felt the applicant was not losing time by settling specifics of the PUD at this point of the review and holding the rezone in abeyance. Following discussion, it was determined that the Committee report would stand as approved. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke requestedDevelopmenttobeexcusedfromtheCouncilChambersduringdiscussionofCommitteetheappealoftheExaminer' s report on Victoria HillsPPUDVictoriaHills SH1DLER McBROOM GATES& LUCAS Seattle ATTORNEYS AT LAW•A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION Bellevue 3500 First Interstate Center 505 Honeywell Center Seattle,Washington 98104 600 108th Ave.N.E. Telephone(206)223-4600 Bellevue,Washington 98004 Telecopier(206)622-5110 Telephone(206)453-0300 Telex:29-2988 Telecopier(206)455-9166 January 29, 1986 JOHN L.HENDRICKSON Bellevue Office Renton City Council c/o City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Honey Creek Associates (R-014-84)/Notice of Appeal Dear Council Members: On behalf of the applicant with regard to the above referenced matter, we hereby respectfully request that the City Council set a date for an appeal hearing with regard to the decision of the hearing examiner dated January 17, 1986. This appeal pertains only to that portion of the examiner's decision which pertains to the rezone application. The appeal fee of $75.00 is enclosed. The applicant's rezone request proposed that the Phase II portion of the property, approximately the eastern half of the site, be rezoned to a combination of R-1 and G-1 zoning. The examiner has recommended that this portion of the subject property be rezoned exclusively to the G-1 zone and his recommendation does not include any R-1 zoning in this area. The Council members are respectfully requested to consider the following errors with regard to the recommendation on the rezone application: 1. The change in the recommendation is inconsistent with the original recommendation of the examiner, without there being any significant change in the evidence that is in the record. In the March 4, 1985 recommendation, the hearing examiner concluded that the areas of proposed R-1 zoning "appear generally compatible with similar single family designations made in the Comprehensive Plan. The largest area is in the northeast quadrant of the parcel and abuts either single family uses in King County or other undeveloped parcels to the north. It encompasses the larger of the two plateaus on the subject site. This district would be a logical extension of the single family uses located east of the site, although not an extension at this time of a Renton single family area." 2. The recommended change in the zoning by the examiner is inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the remand as established by the City Council. The original remand by the Council was for the purpose of having the examiner review the new information and evidence relating to the PPUD. The rezone was remanded solely due to the fact that there was a question regarding the notice for the prior hearing and also the desire of the Council to keep cl1' OF FaNTON rjpN30 D CIiY CLERKS OFF,CE Renton City Council January 29, 1986 Page Two the PPUD and rezone together in the process (please see attached City Council minutes). 3. There is no substantial evidence in the record which establishes that the eastern portion of the subject property contains any hazardous soils conditions which warrant that the site be zoned G-1. The R-1 zones are proposed for the areas generally around the plateaus in the eastern portion of the property, as was recognized by the examiner in the above quoted portion of the March 4, 1985 recommendation. It is anticipated that the residential development in Phase II will be clustered in the plateau area, thus avoiding the steeper slopes where soils conditions may be more sensitive. 4. Soils analysis is a development related issue and should not be a zoning related issue. At such time as a development proposal is considered by the City, it would be prudent for both the City and the applicant to analyze further the soils conditions in the eastern portion of the property. However, this issue is unrelated to zoning and it is evident that the proposed R-1 zoning for the eastern portion meets the zoning criteria as set forth in the initial recommendation of the hearing examiner. 5. Denial of R-1 zoning for the eastern portion of the site is inconsistent with the policy directives of the comprehensive plan for this area. The Plan map clearly designates R-1 zoning for the general areas in the eastern portion of the property that the applicant has proposed to rezone to R-1. For the foregoing reasons, the applicant respectfully requests that the Council reverse the hearing examiner's determination with regard to the zoning application and that the rezone application be approved as submitted. Very Truly Yours, SHIDLER McBROOM GATES LUtS Jo n L. Hendrickson JLH:st 016 Enclosures cc: Mr. Bob Tomberg, Honey Creek Associates Mr. Mel Easter, Johnson Braund Design Group CITY OF RENTON No 14683 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 06 19 7 6 RECEIVED OF `/Cad ;11'-e-f/ ` TOTAL Received by Renton City Council 5/6/85 Page three Planning and Development Committee Report continued Planning and rezone and denied the PPUD on 3/4/85. The Committee has Development considered the appeals and along with other members of the Committee Council has received correspondence regarding this matter Honey (;reek from citizens. This correspondence has been filed in the Associates Appeals record of the proceeding and all parties have been given an continued opportunity to rebut the substance. Continued Questions have been raised regarding the adequacy of the notice given of the hearing before the Hearing Examiner, particularly to residents living in King County who were parties of record to the 10% annexation proceeding under concurrent review by the City. In addition, the developer has presented new evidence of the existence of two separate tax parcels which would consist of legal "lots" as that term is defined in City Code Section 4-702 (L) (4) . This new evidence may have bearing upon the matters at issue in the entire application, but particularly with regard to the allowable density pursuant to the steep slope formula set forth in Section 4-2709(4) (B) (2) . Continued Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council remand both applications encompassed within this appeal to the Hearing Examiner for reconsideration in light of the new evidence regarding the methodology for computation for the steep slope formula, as thus calculated: The Committee further recommended that the City Council request that the Hearing Examiner hold another public hearing, and in addition to City Code requirements for legal notice, notice of the hearing be mailed to all parties of record in this and the annexation proceeding. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Councilwoman Mathews requested that public notice be posted in several places on the east side of the property to alert King County residents of the hearing. CARRIED. John Hendrickson, Suite 505, Honeywell Center, Bellevue, attorney for the applicant, requested that the rezone not be remanded to the Examiner since there was no showing that an error in fact or law had been made and the rezone area complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site. Mayor Shinpoch explained rationale for remand of both applications; rezone and PPUD, to allow appropriate notice to all parties of record and King County residents adjacent to the site. Chairman Stredicke expressed opinion of the Committee that the rezone should not be separated from the PPUD in the review process. Continued Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE #2, Bellevue, Honey Creek Associates, explained diligent efforts to cooperate with City staff and meet City Code requirements in preparing plans, studies, and other data as requested by staff. He claimed that concerns expressed by the Committee have already been raised and addressed through the review process. The first, access, was thoroughly addressed, a traffic study was prepared outlininc multi-access alternatives, and the ERC had declared the access as non- significant. The second, R-2 zoning surrounded by R-1 , was determined to be the most environmentally sound. Third, proposed density of 182 units, or four units per acre, is less than allowed by any other zone. Fourth, the concerns over the steep slope can be addressed through PUD review and need not be addressed during rezone review. Mr. Tomberg requested approval of the rezone in lieu of remanding it to the Hearing Examiner . enabling density to be defined for the PUD. Continued Councilwoman Mathews noted that the applicant had chosen the concurrent review process for annexation, rezone, and PUD. Normally, each application is reviewed and approved separately during a much lengthier process. She felt the applicant was not losing time by settling specifics of the PUD at this point of the review and holding the rezone in abeyance. Following discussion, it was determined that the Committee report would stand as approved. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke requested Development to be excused from the Council Chambers during discussion of Committee the appeal of the Examiner' s report on Victoria Hills PPUD Victoria Hills Renton City Council 5/6/85 Page two Public Hearing continued Dochnahl 75% He reported a request of the Fire Prevention Bureau for Annexation Petition/ dedication of a 30-foot strip on the west side of 136th Bales-Denton Rezone Avenue SE to provide emergency vehicle access; and suggested continued inclusion of the requirement in the language of the ordinance approving the annexation. As an alternative, dedication could be required for any future development. Mr. Munson reiterated the departmental recommendation for approval of both the annexation and rezone; and establishment of a second public hearing on 6/3/85. Continued Upon inquiry, City Attorney Warren advised the Council right to deny the rezone at any point in the process up to adoption of the rezone ordinance. Policy Development Director Springer indicated that through the simultaneous review process, several options exist for approval of both the annexation and rezone, der± °al of both, or approval of the annexation and denial of the rezone. Regarding questions concerning access, he also reported that the Examiner had given thorough consideration to proposed access to the south of the McCann property and the proposal for additional right-of-way. Continued David Sitzman, 13024 SE 72nd Place, Renton, representing the petitioners, spoke in favor of both the annexation and rezone. He felt the proposed developments are consistent with development in the area and a natural extension of City boundaries. He indicated that through an oversight, owners of Lots 2 and 3 had not appealed Condition No. 2 imposed by the Examiner-- joint access agreement between the two lots required by restrictive covenant. City Attorney Warren confirmed that the appeal period for the Examiner' s report has expired. Mr. Sitzman noted that King County zoning for Parcels 3 and 4 allows business use; however, office park development as proposed would have less impact on traffic and surrounding areas. Continued Dennis Dochnahl , 10406 129th SE, owner of Lot 2, objected to the referenced joint access agreement since it would violate an existing lease held with adjacent Old National Bank, and would be unacceptable to both parties. Upon inquiry, Mr. Springer reported that if the annexation was approved and the rezone denied, G-1 (General) zoning would be applied, and existing businesses would be classified as legal non-conforming uses since they conform to existing King County zoning categories. He also noted that rezone conditions for Lots 1 and 4 are acceptable to the proponents, and suggested that access questions on Lots 2 and 3 could be reconsidered by the Examiner. City Attorney Warren advised that the Council is empowered to accept, reject, or modify the Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation, or remand all or part of the recommendation back to the Examiner. Mr. Springer suggested that staff review the access question and offer solutions at the second public hearing. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL SET SECOND PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 3, 1985, FOR CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNEXATION AND REZONE, AND DIRECT STAFF TO ADDRESS ITEM 2 OF THE EXAMINER' S REPORT REGARDING ACCESS. CARRIED. Visitors Mayor Shinpoch welcomed former Councilwoman Margaret Proctor, Welcomed and exchange ctudents from South Africa and Denmark. Advance ~o MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPENDTHEOldBusinessREGULARORDEROFBUSINESSANDADVANCETOPLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORTS UNDER OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman StredickepresentedDevelopmentareportregardingtheappealsfiledbytheapplicantandCommitteecitizenMitchMurrayonHoneyCreekAssociatesRezone (R-014-84) oney r7.57) and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD-015-84) . TheAssociatproposal , consisting of 47.7 acres located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE, is for rezone from G-1PPUD-015-84 to R-1 and R-2 to allow a two-phase multifamilydevelopmentAppealsconsistingof185units. The Hearing Examiner had approved the L7 Zs' fv! h L7 U U V L=W L"/ J' V V U UVU L`7 U V U AIP-mPLEI Cv-1-Yir o BUILDING AND x+' LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION PZ-01+-9Y-1,1PPu 4468c Ait? IN COUNTY AMI STRAT ON RUILOING SEATT LE. WASH. •CIO• tEL 344 7lS0 71E4 IL 30 Win ! c S•, SG-•d-00 & 1( 314 6a3-s7.3 Lot A Owner's Maas Address City Sip Phone Fob Tombera 5611 119th S.E. #2 Bellevue 98006 746-6980 Lot I Owner's Moe Address City. Sip Phone Fob Tomberg 5611 119th S.E. #2 Bellevue, 98006 746-6980 Lot C Owner's Name Address City Sip Phone A/4 Tax Lot I .c%tce of Water Swage Disposal I cart!fy that Lot A 7 1y si Lsnbeo 44 #f &f/r i furnished byionme Le urs is true and cor-y- GG Lot I it C,by s! of &dm rect to the best Lot signature of .y knowledge Lot C N(J N A N Lot C Signature 1/4 See 1./4 Sec Sec Rg Do Not Kroll Pq Soning Re a ea P e Sipe ft VW 4 ITwn13N 1 E 1coaplete !68 W j a-/ b.b- /1 ggwfyp As•7 0p . Legal Descriptions RECEIVED Lot A BLDG. & LAND DEVELOP. f ATTk#t s I/ETc JUN 0 31985. 00 o Lot . 51 is 4 1 e-fle) L07- rtr. . _ 1 5:3 6 C i-H T ii 1 . F: 03 Lot C D ) jilk JAN 2 01986 BUI .DlNG/7(NlnjG DEFT T-271-1 9/83 f/y., •i • • • 1 .. . NORTH CALM trs 2.. it i v I II A' 08• /S ' N JL'fCr7N ON! C 33 7hii NHYry mop ro a td on ` 1\ \ 1`` Ilt; Iiea?" Ind A$ddaileo. /, . ,Pitord of vry 1Iawri9 •rs ieco cd n /hook 17 0!Jun es Ik I a' pig 19, "'care', of k.9 C.unrfj, I1IVayhi? glen.il i i I 1 aee•/e•w I 1a b I o0 N ip. 00 LET• s\ t o i a err/rae H I tj \ R d cie me latfsr Z ill 39. 3,\ •‘I o A a(Ncr+,oe,,,,, J -- Nee I•oo- . \ IA• vet*.- I R • . .• . 85.43' s 4#` Ahem. d/abit1 r di v f'AWL. n 1 : I' lire,Ruord f Survey Itt L01 A N_4117b'ty'ly i. M•N' AY t!`J iikt i 1g aL0TdO Z 11koe — •r jr eiv h•w itili rood tore d43.90'It a, •• w6.Io• A VRidbn 67.,slc Gnu;fs A 1 Do Not Write Below This Line p Approval is hereby granted 0 Disapprove. because: Nt i di Tv.:)k i g lann 9.,/cll.. to NOTE' Approval of this adjustment does not ssure ththeetpropateertyCowntr r thaI- the subject property itself has satisfiedCountyTitle 19) . Pleasc su division requirements (B J will SS.17 and ingnotbe isued to lots which be advised that building permitst gte and code. have not complied with the requirements of s . !. !, i , F-271-9 K 0/83 JAN 2 n --- BUILDING/7' PARCEL A - PROPOSED NEW LEGAL That portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., more particularly described as follows: Ctxrrrp_ncing at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said section; thence South 01°16'00" West along the North-South center of said section 785.4 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEIGINNING; thence North 88°17'00" West 555.64 feet; thence North 01°16'00" Fast 392.58 feet; thence North 88°15'36" West 555 .64 feet; thence South 01°16'00" West 738.80 feet; thence North 88°17'00" West 185 .43 feet; thence South 45°38'29" Fast 343.36 feet; thence South 09°08'29" East 104 .29 feet; thence South 89°08'29" Fast 169.83 feet; thence South 32°08'29" East 495 .09 feet; thence South 00°51'31" West 232.97 feet; thence South 81°08'29" East 9E .20 feet; thence South 11°08'29" East 181.55 feet to the South line of the Southeast Qmarter of the Northwest Quarter of said section; thence South 88°19'25" East along said South line 445.00 feet to the Southeast Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 01°16'00" Fast along the East line of said Quarter 1514.75 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: EXCEPT that portion lying westerly of 120th Place S. E. and northerly of S. E. 97th Street, all in Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. SIEse kt 14- ••14, .• 11 I'u. ' S') 494AL LPG® V AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. County of King PQ b JF M" 1 being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 17th day of January 198i, affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. 410-111 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 7 day of 198/.6 IC e--4:SeeLee_ Notary Publi in and fo. the State of Washington, residing at J E rrin `J therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES: R-014-84 & PPUD-015-84 The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) 1 C 1 1 56E_ January 17, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINE, CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. APPL ICANT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES FILE NO. R-014-84 & PPUD-015-84 LOCATION: Vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a revised joint land use application for approval of rezone of 47.7 acres of property to G-1, R-1 and R-2, and approval of preliminary PUD multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Recommendation: Recommend approval of Rezone and PPUD, with conditions and covenants. BUILDING & Z_ONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on December 2.3, 1985. PUBL.0 HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on December 31, 1985, at 9:30 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The fc[lowing exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Original yellow file containing original application, remand to the Hearing Examiner, and various other documents pertaining to this proposal. Exhibit #2 - Yellow file containing only information on re-submittal showing reduced area. Exhibit #3 - Proposed rezone map showing 47.7 acres, excluding the area known as Devils Elbow. Exhibit #4 - PPUD site plan for Lot A, consisting of 14.06 acres. Exhibit #5 Illustrative drawing showing conceptual design. Exhibit #6 - Letter from Mitch Murray to ERC dated September 25, 1985. Opening the hearing, the Zoning Administrator presented background information on the project, and reviewed the latest revised information submitted by the applicant. Mr. Blaylock presented such information as the rezoning of 47.7 acres into R-1 (29 acres), R-2 6 acres) and G-I (12.07 acres) classifications, and to allow a 72 unit Planned Unit Development on the S.W. portion of the site on 14.06 acres. Due to emergency access concerns the ERC reduced the size of the site, and when remanded from the City Council it was felt both portions of the request should remain together. It was clarified the G-1 zone covering most of the steep slope in the ravine is not part of the PUD request and therefore is not part of the open space considerations. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 2 Reviewing the rezone request, Mr. Blaylock referred to the various Exhibits stating the property is not yet annexed into the City, the property complies with the guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan, the elevation differential is approximately 60 ft., and access to the site will be off Jefferson Avenue N.E., N.E. 21st and emergency access off N.E. 23rd Street. The ERC reviewed the reduced proposal and Mr. Blaylock read their letter of October 18, 1985 directed to the Hearing Examiner wherein they set out their recommendations for approval. Continuing with the review, it was noted when the original proposal was presented in 1984, the City did not have a Greenbelt Ordinance, only a policy. Staff does not have any objection to allowing credit to the developer for the steep sloped areas because in the PUD process for the eastern portion of the site the steep sloped criteria would probably penalize the applicant greater than if the area remained in the greenbelt classification. It is felt this rezone is appropriate for the site and water and sewers are available to the area. Further discussing access, it was stated that using Sunset to Edmonds to N.E. 16th Street or N.E. 23rd South to N.E. 21st Street, a large ravine cuts off the eastern portion of the site thereby causing the City emergency response time to increase by almost 20 minutes, which the ERC stated is not acceptable. In reviewing the PUD, it was pointed out originally there were 99 units proposed for the western portion of the site, this having now been reduced to 72 units. The plan is to have 60 apartment-style units and 12 townhouse units to be located adjacent to the single family area. There is approximately 1-1/2 acres of open space for recreation. A review was given of the PUD criteria noting the site complies with the 4 acre minimum, 40% of the site is to be maintained as open space, all structures are set back 25 ft. from the single family residences, 25 ft. landscape buffer will have to be provided along the western property line, and 4 acres of the 14.06 has slopes in excess of 15%. A brief review was given of the Density Calculation, Slope Reduction and Use Reduction chart on page 5 of the Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner. It is believed by staff the 72 units proposed are acceptable within the above-mentioned calculations. The only real issue in the PUD is whether access is adequate to allow development in the southwest corner of the site. The ERC feels it is adequate, provided access is from Jefferson Avenue, N.E., N.E. 21st and emergency access from N.E. 23rd Street. Because the site was reduced in units, this also reduced the proposed traffic by approximately 30%, to about 430 vehicle trips per day. The ERC felt this figure would not be significant. Mr. Blaylock advised that additional steps may have to be taken during construction to control temporary erosion of the natural vegetation on steeper slopes, and hydroseeding may be necessary. Mr Blaylock stated all of the G-1 area should be covered with a greenbelt preservation covenant that limits cutting of vegetation and requires replacement of vegetation from the erosion process. It was noted the Honey Creek trunk line has been constructed and will soon be in an active state. Due to sandy soil and its possible effect on the site, a geotechnical study had been recommended. A review of comments from the various City departments was given. A recommendation for approval of the rezone was requested, as well as approval of the PUD with conditions requesting the final PUD include a detailed treatment plan be presented for greenbelt areas and detailed improvement plans be submitted showing the location and construction standards for Jefferson Ave. N.E., the extensions of N.E. 21st Street and emergency access on N.E. 23rd Street. Mr. Blaylock had no further comments at this time. The Hearing Examiner called for testimony in support of this application from the applicant or their respresentative. Responding was: Mel Easter Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue So., Suite 200 Renton, Wa. 98055 Mr. Easter stated the applicant agrees with the staff report as presented and feels they can comply with all of the conditions set out therein. He advised the ERC determined development should be limited to the S.W. corner of the site and in response the applicant has relocated the lot line in direct conjunction with the zoning lines for clarification. The total unit count was reduced and the building configuration is exactly as originally presented with the exception of the elimination of the top story of the stack units at the lower end of the site, thereby making them two-story buildings. Lot A now has a density of less than 5 units per acre. Parking has been reduced which increased the total amount of useable open space and recreational areas. Mr. Easter stated they will be providing some type of recreation on the site but the type has not as yet been determined. He feels the zoning is appropriate, complies with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, and timing is right for this type of development. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 3 Calling for further testimony in support of the application, there was no one wishing to speak. Calling for testimony in opposition, wishing to speak was: John Sargent 2016 Edmonds Avenue N.E. Renton, Wa. 98056 Due to the impact of traffic on their present streets, combined with the condition of the streets and erodible soil, Mr. Sargent is opposing this project. He questioned the route for emergency access and stated the streets have 29 degree slopes. He feels run-off of water will make the area even more of a hazard and slide area. He feels the other residents in the area are also in opposition to this project. Further wishing to speak in opposition to this proposal was: Russell Bergeron 2807 N.E. 21st Renton, Wa. 98056 Mr. Bergeron lives at the end of Harrington Street. At that point the corner is a 90 degree turn onto 21st Street. He does not feel 21st Street can handle the full access planned as it can not handle the current traffic. The street is very narrow. He suggested placing a gate at the end of the street as it ends in front of a newly constructed residence. Ben Berry, 2725 N. E. 23rd Street, Renton, Wa. 98056 also wished to testify in opposition to this application. Mr. Berry said the roads in the area are already in poor condition and with the projected 430 vehicle trips per day from this project would worsen the situation. On 23rd, a one-way street, there are already people who park on the side of the street thereby narrowing the roadway even more. He feels City staff should take a closer good look at all of the streets that will be effected in that area before they allow a development of this magnitude to continue. Further testimony in opposition was given by: Alton Benson 2125 Harrington N.E. Renton, Wa. 98056 Mr. Benson was concerned with the improvement of Harrington N.E.. He feels Jefferson Street could easily handle the ingress and egress from the south. On N.E. 23rd there is heavy vehicle as well as pedestrian traffic. Mr. Benson said the angles on the streets in that area are hazardeous. People going north out of the new area would take the Harrington Street route and head up to 21st or 23rd, thereby putting more pressure on those streets. He suggested using the Devils Elbow area and eliminate traffic through the residential area. Mr. Benson stated he would like to see a cost comparison on improvements to 21st, Harrington, and 23rd as compared to the work that would have to be done on widening the streets up to the Devils Elbow connection. He feels the Devils Elbow suggestion would provide better access to northbound traffic and keep traffic off the other residential streets. Further testimony was received from: Mitch Murray 2813 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Mr. Murray made reference to previous letters he had presented on this matter, and referring to Exhibit #6 stated the alternative access plan suggested would use the Devils Elbow area. Referring to the assessors map and the possible widening of roads in the area, Mr. Murray stated if the widening does take place to accommodate the PUD, there will have to be some property acquisition along the proposed routes. He stated on 21st Street there is 30 ft. right-of-way, Harrington Place is mostly 45 ft. and N.E. 23rd Street the right-of-way is only 40 ft. and not 50 ft. as required by the code. Regarding emergency access on N.E. 23rd, it was pointed out there is only a 20 ft. right-of-way and a 15 ft. pavement. The fire code requires a 20 ft. pavement and the report to the Examiner states the Fire Department, in this instance, has authorized a 15 ft. pavement. Mr. Murray does not feel the Fire Marshall has the authorization to allow below minimum standards. Referring to a cross-section of the west property line it was noted there should be a 5 ft. bulkhead requried on both sides of the road as the roadway cuts into a hill. Referring to the property in the R-1 zone, Mr. Murray stated more than half of the land shown is land the ERC classified as unbuildable. Honey Creek Associates R-01L-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page ,a He stated in the R-1 zone slopes range from 25% - 40%, making the statement in the report that the G-i property contained the most sloped land, erroneous; feels the G-1 portion should be enlarged and the R-1 portion reduced to more accurately reflecL the slopes of the site. He pointed out the northern and eastern boundaries are developed, not undeveloped as stated by staff. A map folio put out by the State and referred to in the City Code shows the ravine area as a class #3 which is the most severe class with regard to erosion, potential earthquake damage and landslides, and recommended a professional geotechnical study be made of the entire site to determine if there should be any development at all. In conclusion, Mr. Murray stated he feels it would be a benefit to develop the area to alleviate some of the nuisances currently in the area, but the current proposal with its proposed access would degrade the neighboring areas. He is opposed to the project, as it is currently presented. Wishing to speak in opposition also was: Tom Malmoe 12.105 S.E. 96th Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Mr. Malmoe clarified some of the information presented by staff such as the property representated is in fact bordered by single family residences and not undeveloped as reported by staff. Also, the impression is that the northern portion of the site may be accessible at 95th Way but this is incorrect as there is no access currently available to any of the northern borders of the subject property. Hillcrest School was mentioned as being available, but this is incorrect as it has been closed for several years. Kennydale School is available but such a distance away from the site that it will require bussing. Mr. Malmoe supported Mr. Murray's statement that the site is classified as Class #3, and possesses unstable soils that are prone to erosion. He pointed out the hazards that will be created by the traffic added to their now burdened streets. He feels development in that area would help with the undesirable conditions they now have such as motorcycles and firing Jf firearms, etc., but does not feel this is the proper development, as proposed. Pete Caple, 9628 - 123rd S.F_., Renton, Wa. 98056 testified in opposition to the proposal for reasons stated by previous persons testifying, and in particular, due to the impact it will have on the creek and the fish and game in the area. He feels by having further access up the creek without any fencing or some other controls, the problem will worsen. If access was provided via Devils Elbow, in the winter the conditions are so hazardous it is going L:o cause monumental problems due to continuous icey conditions that remain due to the shaded roadway. He also feels any access through Devils Elbow to 95th is going to add to their problem of mud run-off, potholes, and already overburdened road. George Pratt, 12116 S.E. 96th Place, Renton, Wa. 98056 spoke in opposition. He said the Devils Elbow road is a sub-standard road, and should access to this proposal be provided on that road it should be brought up to City standards. The topography in the area does not permit the road to be brought up to standard. It has been asphalted on both sides by the County and the City of Renton, and has no shoulders or marking lines. A geologist has viewed the area and it has been classified as the Vashon Outwash, which is a sand with norms,ly a layer of clay below. The sand in this instant area is about 60 ft. This is a class 3 area and he requested a geotechnical study to be made on both the Renton and King County sides of the site. Calling for further testimony, speaking in opposition to this proposal was: Roger Fletcher 2509 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Mr. Fletcher lives in Weatherwood II which is a main traffic thoroughfare for traffic going downhill to Edmonds. He feels the additional traffic is going to increase the speed with which the traffic would come down the hill making it extremely hazardous. He recommended traffic bumps on the road and a maximum speed limit of 20 mph. Mrs. Wayne Oyler, 2132 Harrington N.E., Renton, Wa. 98056 referred to the staff report and mention of access on Jefferson and questioned who was going to be responsible for paying for the improvements. She referred to the opening of Jefferson, the curves in the area roads, and expressed concern over the motorcycles that will be speeding causing more of a hazard to pedestrians as well as vehicles. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 5 The Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock said the ERC did not feel additional traffic improvements would be necessary beyond the actual development on-site. He said last year the Public Works Department placed a 2 inch overlay on Harrington Avenue N.E. coming from the south so there is a section of Jefferson south of the subject site, approximately 150-200 ft. that should be resurfaced to induce people to go out that direction rather than going north. He stated the ERC did not feel the additional traffic would warrant off-site improvements, but the Hearing Examiner could make this a condition of approval if he chose to do so. Calling for additional comments, speaking again was Mel Easter. Mr. Easter said his staff spent many months working with City staff to determine the appropriate access to this development. The access from Devils Elbow was explored but staff felt this was not an appropriate access. The access from Jefferson Street will be the major access, and it is not their intent to introduce any more automobiles onto N.E. 21st beyond those that would normally use that area. The improvements on Jefferson should welcome cars from that access as opposed to the 21st Street access. He stated the applicant is aware of some potential instabilities on the site but more geotechnical studies will be completed before construction is begun. The attorney for the applicant, John Hendrickson, Suite 505, Honeywell Center, Bellevue, Wa. commented the zoning proposal is exactly the same as was considered by the Examiner earlier this year. He reiterated the City Council did not object to the zoning and an earlier appeal was not upheld. The matter was remanded back to the Examiner due to a question of proper notification and it was felt both matters should proceed together as opposed to becoming separate issues. Mr. Hendrickson reviewed the greenbelt area as reflected on the Comprehensive Plan for this application stating it will be protected by the PUD process. There will be no developement in the steep sloped areas - they will be preserved as greenbelts. He stated the greenbelt will be preserved, and it is felt the zoning is appropriate and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mitch Murray commented the current proposal does not involve a PUD on the east side. He feels it is important that the Hearing Examiner consider just what land can be developed and its appropriate zoning. He noted the presentation today is different from that of the first hearing. Mike Gould, 12129 S.E. 96th Place, Renton, Wa. 98056 asked Mr. Blaylock to review for him the method used to compute the vehicle trips per day for the proposal. He had no further comments. There was no one else wishing to testify and no further comments offered by staff. The hearing closed at 11:30 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: The following report utilizes many of the Findings and Conclusions of the original report of the Hearing Examiner issued on March 4, 1985. Changes in some of the Findings reflect the modified proposal now subject to review. Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Honey Creek Associates, has requested approval of a classification of approximately 47.7 acres of property, upon annexation, to R-1 (Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 7,200 sq ft), R-2 (Duplex Residential), and G-1 General; Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size 35,000 sq ft). The applicant has also requested simultaneous approval of a Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD) of 72 dwelling units on approximately 14.06 acres of the site. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, the previous Decision and remand in this matter and other pertinent documents was entered in the record. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C, 1971, as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. The determination was predicated upon the development of only the acreage located south and west of Honey Creek. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 6 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject site is located in the vicinity of 2200 Jefferson Avenue N.E., immediately south and generally east of 120th Place S.E. which is more commonly known as Devils Elbow. 6. The subject site in unincorporated King County is just north of the north central portion of the City. The applicant has applied for a concurrent annexation into the City, together with a rezone of the property for residential purposes. Generally, property annexed into the City is automatically classified G-1, a category which permits large lot single family uses. Specifically one dwelling per every 35,000 square feet. State enabling law permits a jurisdiction to conditionally zone property prior to its annexation. The zoning would then automatically become effective upon annexation. 7. In a similar fashion, State law permits the underlying land use approval to occur prior to annexation, again conditioned upon ultimate annexation. The applicant has requested conditional approval of a PPUD for up to 72 dwelling units on the subject site. The PPUD would be effective and binding if the site were eventually annexed into the City. The applicant has reduced the number of units significantly since the proposal was originally reviewed. The requested rezone, for the purposes of this hearing, continues to cover the entire parcel. The subject site was originally two separate lots and the applicant processed a lot line adjustment through King County to redivide the property along a line corresponding generally with the alignment of Honey Creek. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of greenbelt, single family and low density multi-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. While not specific, a large portion in the central area of the site is designated for greenbelt. This would appear to generally coincide with the steep slope areas containing Honey Creek and its ravine and tributary ravines. An area along the southern property line would appear to be designated for the low density multi-family residential uses, reflecting that area's close proximity to an existing R-2 zone. The remaining outlying portions of the site would then be designated for single family uses in the Comprehensive Plan. 9.The subject site contains complex topographical features. Two relatively level plateaus occur in the northeast and southwest quadrants of the subject site. Running more or less diagonally through the site from the northwest to the southeast is Honey Creek. The creek is situated in a steep walled ravine with slopes ranging in excess of 56%. The subject site was an old quarry, and some of the slopes had been altered in the past. An old road grade was cut into the site from Devils Elbow to approximately the area of the proposed R-2 district. 10. The areas east and north of the subject site would remain in King County. Development surrounding the site is mixed. Single family uses are located east of the site, generally clustered in a number of single family subdivisions. South of the subject site is a senior citizens housing development and duplex housing developed during World War II. Single family housing is located west of the subject site. 11. The zoning districts within Renton, adjacent to the subject site, are R-1 west of the subject site and R-2 south of the subject site. The break in zoning occurs at the site's southern property line. For the most part, the R-1 district includes most of the City west of the subject site, although other districts are embedded within this very large R-1 district. The R-2 district south of the subject site is a multi-block district within which is a P-i (Public/Quasi-Public) district containing the Hillcrest elementary school grounds. A smaller R-1 district is located adjacent to the southeast corner of the subject site. 12. There is no sewer service to the subject site currently. The new Honey Creek line runs through the ravine in the center of the site and service would be off this line. The line will probably be operational by the time the subject site is ready for development. 13. Storm drainage from the subject site will be into Honey Creek. Water lines will have to be extended to serve the subject site. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 7 14. Due to the complex topography of the subject site, and given the existing development pattern in the general area, access routes to developable portions of the subject site are limited. The ERC required that access to the site be generally from the southwest. Under that requirement primary access would be via Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 21st Street, with secondary emergency access via N.E. 23rd Street. Most of the public opposition revolved around the proposed access and it's attendant impacts on the existing single family neighborhood and the inadequate road network. A new concern raised in the course of the new proceedings was the slide potential of the site. (See below). 15. The record indicates that both N.E. 21st and N.E. 23rd are substandard streets. While this issue was raised previously, definitive information concerning street width was still not forthcoming. The record remains unclear, the widths appear to be between 20 and 45 feet, with a lesser paved width along most sections. Access via N.E. 21st necessitates usage of Harrington P1. N.E. and N.E. 23rd, both substandard streets, to gain access to northern arterial streets. Harrington is also less than 45 feet and narrows to 25 feet at its northerly end - paved width less than 25 feet. Southerly travel from 21st could involve a circuitous route along Harrington P1. - Harrington Circle - Harrington Avenue and then either Index Ave or Harrington again. Then, across N.E. 16th to Edmonds. The Oylers, adjacent property owners, have not completed an approved lot line adjustment which would have provided a dedication of additional width along 21st. They oppose primary access to the subject site along 21st and would be expected to withhold access rights. 16. These substandard streets and circuitous routes are heavily utilized by residents northwest of the subject site to gain access to the Sunset Boulevard shopping areas. Likewise, residents south and east of the subject site utilize this circuitous route in the opposite direction to gain access to I-405. As defined in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, these streets are solely intended for local access. Their size, construction and maintenance also indicates local access status. Neighborhood collectors per the Subdivision Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan are to be 60 feet - paved for 36 feet. The proposed opening of Jefferson Ave does not raise as many concerns as does its linkup with 21st in the southwest corner of the subject site. Residents along Harrington, 21st and 23rd Streets are concerned that this would open an even more direct route through a residential neighborhood, with narrow streets requiring left and right turns since no through street is available. 17. The traffic analysis prepared for the subject proposal predicts 60% of the PPUD development's traffic will travel south from the project site toward Kirkland Ave N.E. The remainder of the traffic from this area of the site would travel over other roads north and west of the site. 18. The proposed access roads have grades between 10 and 15%. A proposed access via Devils Elbow along the former quarry road in this alignment appears to have similar grades. 19. Density calculations based upon the PUD formula were originally a subject of dispute. The only potential area for dispute in the instant case might be over the choice of contour interval. The agency with primary jurisdication, the Building Department, appears to have made a reasonable determination in this selection. In addition, it was not disputed. 20. The total number of units, barring slope, street and dedication deductions which could be accommodated on those portions of the site for which the applicant has requested R-1 zoning would be 48.36, while 72 units could be accommodated under the applicant's R-2 request, for a total of 120.36 units. Dedications would reduce the acreage by approximately .85 acres or 5.1 units, and street set asides would reduce the acreage by 1.6 acres or 9.6 units. The slope formula used by the Building Department, deducting the most acreage due to severe slope, would reduce the development potential by 31.9% or 33.71 units. The total would permit 71.95 units which was just .05 units below the applicant's request of 72 units. 21. The potential 72 units are only those for the south or west side of the the main creek area. No proposal has been submitted for the area east or north of Honey Creek. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 8 22. The proposal for the rezoning has not changed and includes property on both sides of Honey Creek. The applicant proposes reclassifying approximately 6.0 acres to R-2; approximately 29 acres to R-1 and approximately 12.7 acres to G-1. (See attached map). The R-2 property would be located on the southwestern plateau approximately 75 feet below the surrounding grade, approximately 190 feet north of the south property line, and approximately 190 feet east of the west property line. Three separate areas are proposed for R-1 zoning. One of the R-1 districts proposed by the applicant would be approximately 'L' shaped. It is the property at the extreme southwest corner of the subject site and would be bounded by R-1 zoning on the west and R-2 zoning on the south. That district would be approximately 8.06 acres. The other proposed R-1 districts would be located on the east side of Honey Creek. One area would be along the north end of the subject site and would be approximately 16.14 acres. The other R-1 zone would be along the eastern perimeter of the subject site and would be approximately 4.81 acres. The G-1 zone proposed by the applicant would include the stream bed of Honey Creek together with a large percentage of the steep side hills and ravines above Honey Creek, and tributary ravines. 23. No population projections or school age student projections were made for the subject proposal by staff. The project with its 72 units would generate an estimated 430 vehicle trips per day. Comparisons were drawn indicating that the development of approximately 43 single family homes, the potential under single family zoning on this site, would generate a similar amount of traffic. 24. The site is apparently subject to slides. Slides have occurred while the sewer line was being installed in the creek bed, and other slides and sloughs have occurred in the past along the steep walls above Honey Creek, both on and off the subject site. The soils are sandy soils of Class III, making the site quite susceptible to erosion, earthquake and landslide damage. 25. The proposed emergency access at N.E. 23rd Street has a proposed width of 12 feet, whereas the required minimum standard is 20 feet. Authority to waive the requirement was not shown. CONCLUSIONS REZONE 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. While the map and some policy elements of the Comprehensive Plan do not entirely justify the requested zoning, the topographic isolation of the subject site would appear to support portions of the request. The potential soils' problems would appear to require additional information for those portions of the site not part of the proposed PPUD. Proposed R-2 District 2. The area that has been proposed for R-2 zoning does not appear to be located in the area strictly designated for low density multi-family dwelling units per the Comprehensive Plan. While the Comprehensive Plan designates the southern area of the subject site for duplex-type housing stock, the area proposed is approximately 200 feet north of the southern property line. The major rationale in the Comprehensive Plan would appear to be that the area so designated is a continuation of existing zoning patterns, that is, an R-2 zoning district is located immediately south of the subject site. As proposed, the rezone is some 200 feet north of the existing R-2 zone, and in fact, separated from it by proposed R-1 zoning. The request would carve out a new and independent R-2 zone in the midst of single family and extremely low density single family zoning. But on the whole, this does not seem unreasonable given the topographical separation of the various areas. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 9 3. While there may be some non-compliance with the Comprehensive Plan evident on the south boundary, the proposal provides reasonable separation on the west where separately owned, single family zoned and developed uses are located. The proposed R-1 zoning is a continuation of the existing zoning patterns and reasonably complements it. So while the proposed location of the R-2 zoning does not follow strict orthodox land use practices, the consequences of divergence are not really a problem. The location is sufficiently isolated from adjoining properties by it's unique topography to cause little concern about adverse or undue effects of such a district on neighboring property. The plateau lies approximately 75 to 100 feet lower than the southerly properties, thereby creating a discrete environment and neighborhood. 4. While the proposed location for the R-2 district would provide certain density bonuses to the applicant, the zoning does not appear to adversely affect neighboring properties and is compatible with those policies of the Comprehensive Plan which look for topographical barriers to provide buffers between distinct zoning categories. The bonus it may provide the applicant is obviously a trade-off to protect the stream environment, while allowing the applicant reasonable development of private property. Proposed R-1 District 5. The three areas proposed for R-1 zoning appear generally compatible with similar single family designations made in the Comprehensive Plan. But, given the distinct geologic hazard idenitified on the State maps, Class III soils type, which identify the site as very unstable, it may be premature to discuss the easterly side of the stream where the applicant has not proposed any particular development. The proposed PPUD for the westerly acreage permits hazards to be avoided by shifting development. At present, that cannot be said for the easterly R-1 zones proposed. Until the applicant can provide geotechnical studies demonstrating the suitablity for development on the steeper areas and even the more gentle plateaus, the zoning should be limited to G-1, the category automatically applied if the site were annexed. There are substantial steep slopes along the eastern edge of Honey Creek within the perimeter of the two proposed R-1 areas, and R-1 zoning under the circumstances is premature. If the site were G-1 instead of classified R-1 as requested, then the zoning would be the same as those areas confined within the steeper Honey Creek ravine, which appears appropriate. When the site's isolation from emergency services is considered it does not seem at all unreasonable to leave the site with G-1 zoning. The possibility for rezoning in the future is not foreclosed and can be considered in light of changed conditions and additional information pertaining to the geology of the site. 6. The last area proposed for R-1 zoning is the portion which wraps around the proposed R-2 district on the west and south. This area is more-or-less "L" shaped. It follows the western and southern property lines of the site. As discussed above in the R-2 analysis, it continues the adjacent western R-1 district onto the subject site and acts to buffer the less intense single family uses to the west from the proposed R-2 zone. This area also marks that portion of the site which makes the transition from the Highlands relatively level topography to the steep topography adjacent to Honey Creek. These are the slopes above the proposed R-2 zone. 7. This R-1 zoning appears generally compatible with the designation in the Comprehensive Plan and again, it continues the existing single family zoning pattern west of the site to the site. Proposed G-1 District 8. The G-1 zoning proposed for the Honey Creek stream course and ravine system appears appropriate. Under current zoning practice in the City, G-1 provides the least intense residential density criterium of any zoning district. It would be compatible with the other proposed districts for the subject site, namely R-1 and R-2. As proposed, it would serve to protect those areas designated greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan, and in that regard, it is quite compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. The request actually would coincide with the zoning the site would attain, if the Council took no prior action, since the property would automatically enter the City with G-1 zoning. As indicated above, this G-1 zoning would be contiguous with the G-1 zoning which the recommendation to deny the easterly R-1 districts would create. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 10 PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 9. The development of the subject site as a PUD appears to serve the public use and interest. The unique topography and environment of the subject site can only be enhanced by clustering and designing around the steep slopes and Honey Creek. The 72 units would not produce substantially more traffic than a single family neighborhood. The topographical isolation would appear sufficient to avoid any adverse impacts from incompatible housing types or densities on adjoining properties. At this stage the applicant has not provided a definitive plan for housing types, only a schematic proposal as is required for Preliminary PUDs. The housing would be clustered and encircle the level westerly plateau, which would be left for open space purposes. Two story stacked flats would be located along the eastern portion of the site while townhouse units would be located near the southwest corner of the site closer to the developed areas of the City. The plans appear a reasonable approach and should be approved. Final plans would have to be more detailed and provide the requisite open space, recreation and building details. 10. The issue of slope stability cannot be ignored. While the site seems suitable from a land use perspective for a PUD of 72 units, the geological underpinnings of the site could conceivably modify this belief. With the submission of the Final PUD the applicant will have to present a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Building and Zoning and the Public Works Departments. The report shall include but not be limited to information regarding: site stability/slope integrity: preservation of the ravine and stream close Lo their current state: long term implications of development on erosion potential: geologic hazard including earthquake analysis: site preparation and restoration: and building techniques. 11. The PUD appears to present a reasonable method of developing an environmentally sensitive site, permits the applicant reasonable use of the site, which is private property, and appears to protect the fragile environment. The applicant should be required to provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is ever sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowners/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. ACCESS 12. The access concerns of residents remain even with the scaling down of the proposal. It is not just the increased population of the subject proposal, but the creation of a new defacto through street - the connection of Jefferson and 21st which raises many concerns. The streets surrounding the subject site are not collector roads, and in their current state should not be utilized as such. The connection of Jefferson to Kirkland as •a through street will provide a less circuitous access from the Sunset area to the west and I-405. While the small residential neighborhood now serves as such a link, its narrow, partially paved streets should not be made more attractive by a clear cross town route. Without substantial upgrading of roads which require width improvements, property acquisition and surface upgrading, the proposed access is inappropriate. It might still be inappropriate even with upgrading due to its effects on the residents along 21st, Harrington PI, and 23rd, since these streets were never intended to carry through traffic, and homes are located closer to the street than would normally be the case along collector streets. 13. With the information presented, this Office is not convinced that the through connection of Jefferson/21st would serve the public use and interest. As a matter of fact the opposite appears true, it is not in the public interest. While it is obvious that the inclusion of the roadway appropriately named Devils Elbow into the City was purposely avoided to avoid maintenance responsibilities, access, at least secondary access to the subject site if it is really needed at all, could be via this route. It was the access method proposed at the annexation hearings before the City Council and remained the applicant's original choice until the ERC review, and the ERC review did not have the benefit of public input. Conflicting figures submitted regarding potential road grade do not weigh more heavily for one method over the other. The grades appear comparable. Honey Creek Associates R-01L-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page t 1 14. The only potential reason for the connecting link is for the convenience of emergency vehicles, but that should not be the sole criteria. Convenience in the absence of necessity in the instance case is not persuasive. The proposed link will generate additional use of substandard roads, exacerbate the wear on already inadequate pavement and adversely affect a neighborhood. If Devils Elbow could serve for emergency purposes, it should be considered. It still need not be annexed into the City to serve such a purpose. A question remains - Why does the site need two main approaches? Jefferson could provide the primary access point and N.E. 23rd could remain a gated emergency approach to the site. (Although this Office would like to be informed of the authority to waive the minimum width standards for an emergency access and what criteria were utilized). Many other complexes such as Cedar Ridge and Woodcliffe have one primary entry with an emergency access which is gated, and some such as Forest Brook only have one entry point. There does not seem to be any need to create the proposed link between Jefferson and N.E. 21st, and certainly the impacts appear to outweigh the benefits. 15. If the connection between Jefferson and 21st is approved, the applicant should bear the cost of upgrading the roads and acquiring additional right-of-way to provide the additional width necessary, especially in light of the additional usage anticipated. Local residents should not be required to bear the costs. As an analogy, similar development of a more intense complex in the midst of existing single family homes on substandard roads can be found in the CHG Sunpointe Complex. Anticipating the possible consequences, all road agreements should clearly define the full obligations involved. 16. This decision is not intended to affect the proposed annexation. This review and analysis was handled as though the property were already included within the City. No judgment is intended on the merits of annexation which will be considered by the City Council after separate review and deliberation. 17. In conclusion, if the City Council should approve the annexation of the subject site, the Council should consider zoning the subject site as outlined above and represented on Exhibit #2, with the exception that the two easterly R-1 zones should be permitted the G-1 zoning which would automatically attach upon annexation. 18. The PPUD proposed by the applicant should be approved subject to the submission of the detailed engineering report, the elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st, with covenants requiring the slopes on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as close as possible in their natural state, and providing a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property for maintenance purposes. RECOMMENDATION The City Council should: 1. Approve the requested zoning for the subject site subject to the submission of a PUD for eventual development of the subject site, subject to annexation of the site into the City, and as limited by the above language. 2. Approve the PPUD subject to the submission of the detailed engineering report, the elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st, provide covenants requiring the slopes on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as close as possible in their natural state, and providing a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property for maintenance purposes. ORDERED THIS 17th day of January, 1986. FRED J. KA AN HEARING EX INER Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 12 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of January, 1986 to the parties of record: Mel Easter Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue So., Suite 200 Renton, Wa. 98055 John Sargent 2016 Edmonds Avenue N.E. Renton, Wa. 98056 Russell Bergeron 2807 N.E. 21st Street Renton, Wa. 98056 Alton Benson 2125 Harrington N.E. Renton, Wa. 98056 Mitch Murray 2813 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Tom Malmoe 12105 S.E. 96th Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Roger Fletcher 2509 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Ben Berry 2725 N.E. 23rd Street Renton, Wa. 98056 Pete Caple 9628 - 12.3rd S.E. Street Renton, Wa. 98056 George Pratt 12116 5.E. 96th Place Renton, Wa. 98056 Mrs. Wayne Oyler 2132 Harrington N.E. Renton, Wa. 98056 Mike Gould 12129 S.E. 96th Place Renton, Wa. 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of January, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director l.arry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed ii writing on or before January 31, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decisicn of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forLh the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 13 An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) commuinications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the propof.al. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and membars of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This permits all intere3ted parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. For purposes of these decisions and recommendations the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered discretionary. When the report is a recommendation to the City Council the terms "should" and "shall" are intended to inform the City Council that if they approve the recommendation the items should be mandatory to preserve the intent of the decision. r Date: September 25, 1985 Y NO. From: Mitch Murray O/iL _ 2813 NE 23rd Place F Renton, Washington 98056 Phone: (206) 237-8057 206) 237-8056 206) 228-2288 To:City of Renton Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Attention: Rodger Blaylock 200 Mill Avenue South Renton , Washington 98055 References: 1 . Building and Zoning Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner, for public hearing on February 19, 1985 (R-014-84, PPUD-015-84). 2. Hearing Examiner's Report, dated March 4,1985 (R-014-84, PPUD-015-84) . This letter is regarding the the Honey Creek area rezone and PPUD (R-014-84, PPUD- 015-84). I li' e near the subject area and I have been following the progress of the appl ' cations over the last few years. I am very familiar with the area and the Froposals submitted so far. I strongly disagree with the proposed location of access to the area presented in reference 1 . , which is still being considered as shown on Figure A, which I obta ned from the Building and Zoning department on September 25, 1985. I m et 'wi'th the Develop (Mick Santa, Mel Easter, etc. n September 24, 1985 to discuss my objections with the plans for access. I piesented the access ideas shown on Figure B, which I believe are vastly improved over the plans showr on Figure A. The Developers stated tome that they may be willing to consider the new arrangement proposed by me (Figure B). However they are concerned that the City of Renton Building and Zoning Department and/or the ERC nay not approve my plan (Figure B). Thus I would like to present my access plans to the ERC for consideration. My plans (Figure B) differ from the old plans (Figure A) in the following ways: 1 . I have eliminated access by NE 21 Street. This was done to reduce the amount of traffic from the PPUD that would go thru the single family neighborhoods on NE 21st Street, Harrington Place NE, NE 23rd Street and NE 23rd Place. Furthermore eliminating the NE 21st Street connection to Jefferson Avenue NE reduces potential cross town traffic from the highlands from using Jefferson Ave NE and NE 21st Street to get to I-405 via Harrington Place NE, NE 23rd Street and NE 23rd Place. In addition, the Hearing Examiner's report (Reference 2 ) mentions concern with access via NE 21st Street (page 10, paragraphs 15 and 17) . 2. I have eliminated emergency access by NE 23rd Street. This was done to reduce the PPUD impact on the neighboring single family neighborhood. In addition the proposed NE 23rd access was not up to fire code standards because the paving width is only 15ft. There is not currently sufficient right of way to widen it to more than 15ft pavement width. This is because of bulkhead and planting strip requirements that must fit within the existing overall right of way of only 20ft. ) 3. I have eliminated the access roadway along the western property line. This roadway would be very damaging to the residential environment of the residential properties along the western property line due to the noise generated by the traffic generated by the PPUD. In addition, there is no requirement for this roadway since primary access to the lower level can be adequately handled by the roadway along the southern property line. page 2 4.' 'I 'have provided 1 •gency access via SE 97th Stre (Devil 's Elbow). The Devil ' s Elbow roadway is currently 18ft wide uvcr most of its length. Sufficient right of way (60ft) exists such that it could be widened 'to 20ft if it is deemed necessary. The Hearing Examiner's Report (Reference 2) suggests that the Devil 's Elbow road should be considered for emergency access (Page 10, paragraph 16) . 5. I have repositioned the northern most apartment unit (four apartments) labeled A on Figure A. This was done to provide room for a culdesac. Two of the four units have been attached to the southern side of unit B on figure A. , the other two units from unit A were repositioned to the western edge of unit D on figure A. These repositionings are all shown on figure B. 6. I have repositioned apartment unit C on Figure A to a location next to apartment unit G in order to make room for the emergency access roadway to SE 97th Street. If ycu have any questions please feel free to contact me. Si ncE rely, j/dt,,( fv( 7 Mitch Murray page 3 VICINITY NIA a 7. wo Ava. 1 kiti ill" II i 1 V‘ \ i 7 /7 : inn-- F1---- ---- 1 II Lii !7-5l ''''\\i f,/% 4. '''' , • xletln9 R-1 zone i J A \ ////// /V- / / 1 ( ir Ili ile co V ` fri/ ////> 1i1q1(I I 1 IIAt\%\ i.\\\\‘\ \\ pn Rt.It 1 \a1Vst,', k 0 S` N \ LOT 'B': 33.84 ACRES VI 7--\ 1/4., vikklit„ W1;1 \ 00 / ( W - V 1/1//' 7: ::1 . oipo... Av. \, \ s, \ \ i , 1 ___\.__4/iil` \\ ,Ns`,:' • ‘‘ N 1 \ \ t \ \ 0\,.________ L:i 5,,y. , , 1;=\‘' \\ N\\ k 1 \---:------:::7-_.-- 1jiill. 2. \ \ \ \ \ ' -‘ 4 VI) \\ L-7--".7:7--=------=---.--T ) )/ , C 1 1) TriNek 1.4k* L i 1 wid4tANNIO• 1 . I 2 . 1 li 1 vwt 0---N• Ai, \\ P , c --!.-0,—1 , ,, .. , , \ .‘,. ,LL., _ .1,.. u I ,.. - v\: i?,(' __ 1tl i 2 W08 OqY. s ,‘ \.‘ - t\\\T a^ BTACKEp F AT8 c '\ ill s\- \ E., III 14411114-1NZN‘ II ..tra.. o 11 i ' 'A111. ' OPEN SPACE FOR 1 I I I tIlk, \\I ACTIVEiPA881VE RECRLA ION• 4,01*Mil I 1 IL fir fro:+ t 4; 11TAP. BTOR • I J l 8TKED FL TS -I ,, i j / j 6 (ji c_... 1,4:01-o*-vvzi- T------ii Q fir , ,., 0 .,.\, (, vim-. / i::-: 4-7%;- ____,#*,= ---z= 4.en. a-_--4 , , li . ;.:V ,.- Irop7r4r ,. .-_.,-_ ---,el:* ' ---' I w\' ‘. s _ ...,__„,,-..- . 14. ( . r ____L— ---D 1 ,.... m ,)•44 -c2e0'..1 l*- N' ‘•1•Ata \ \ - 7: JEFFERW •O AV6 rK existlnp R-2 zone 1' r T,in[N_U t, 1 , L_ I I—.- 1 ,v-„--,1...:L 1L N\ i Zs"S&PB`_ A Sc.AL : 16s F- -A N r' \ Ginza A w e VICINITY MAP 122 NO Ave. w V .v'S /W 4. O / 41 ' ° 4EI1V"."'"1. I r 7 / >1 I fl tl d existing R-1zoos JiitILif_H_ 7( i /,, x::7/ 7..:_ Ti 1 lill:- fitI1' \ pp1) I greenbelt 1 \\ ,t \ t \ \ \ 1t., l' i\41 '„ (,\ . N LOT 'B': 53.64 ACRES 1"... le42: 4 \41" \'%. 1 k.1;&.. \ '\ki ( )' ( 7- s\ w.'- W•$ ,. . 1 /1,,-/„....--,z,_--.. _____, . g' A' 'At 1/$ ( --- \ s\\ \ 311/$(r \ w\ , \ t \\ tIl 7:----<-iN, 110,,,\ \\‘Adin\ )1 i k ISA III \ \ 2..;:.-..;-•'''''' ,)j . 1 ) 1 1 V\ i Kto ir \ Q AMMO , // it 2 11 \' n \.1 A 1 ) 7-4/142/2,-, 0/ ilm ' ' ' 11 @Ilk ki\,.-\ . kl(((/'(/ '7rv .?.. , 11;o hi2=;_-:_-:. It ,,___,,,.. 40\11 , .., ;..: am 4100,... XL -.\\\'&\ \\\$\ \\) \ \1vi .,>, , \ 1, 1,k A egieri#1, ANN N:L. 4"‘!\,,.\\\ \ \ 1i,g Vs1/ qpir ,e. P t4,6,, ., \ jahi,kr.;1 ,\\\I0 %A) ' . OPENSPACE f!) ' .\\10, .. OR ACTIVE/PASSIVE R I v. LOT 'A': 7. 06 - s74-t)**Ntt 4 0, .\,. 1._\\\\\.. .,..\.\ 1. 1\ 111111; fig,.. . 8' . i i _ Th-- - KED l Te _-Fro A,A „ ., kit, ik, .) \A 1\‘ 'st'l t (r II 1 oltr* ' - ik'`\ ,\‘' \\\ k..-s- 3- -F-_,-/ -1 •Ls 74,.‘, v4114; 000# 40,400... iiii, -...1/41;: th. ---- —______ --- —=—.--_ ___________ -----).- 7-1.Th t C Car c i?, — d ) I ( ‘A''' a (' (-- i -7- 1 N M•.1'9e'N 11M JEFFERSON c AVE'MIL - existing R-2 zone RZL\RF_It--jii — n 1 Y-'--- - 2S5EPSS- • M,D, M u fk R AY 3( IIfl11C.JOFINSON—BRALADESIGNGROUPPS.,INC. 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE 200 DATE Joe NO. RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 I — 17- No JOB ATTENTION RENTON 271-7200 SEATTL 623-5732 RE: I A 1-1 TO G, ' ( e1/L on 714 ill Ave,C i-Foy mac,) U iQ1 oin/ q8o 5 4*1. 9. ZalI l• WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings Prints Plans Samples Specifications Copy of letter Change order fq COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION l I g provela-- 41,1- al'l5V-rx iok' yow-- tiligs. CITY OP YFNTf r; [ 1 \T piI JAN 2 01986 DUILDING/ZONING D[P1 THESE ARE 1RANSMITTED as checked below: For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted LI Submit copies for distribution As requested Returned for corrections Return corrected prints For review and comment FOR BIDS DUE 19_ _ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS— COPY TO_ 2/ 1/7Sc'e/SIGNED: PRODUCT 243 Lames Inc..Gmfnn,Mass.0:471 If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. I 'I Y7 i I.! • r,-- l'it a q114IN NORTH t1 A 88' /'f' PN" N 190704, !/, Vf2 Vigil/' SUN Rio./s hesGd en ` 1\i dike/ .0,141 Asseemr/r..s brc. Accord of urvt yy \\ \ 1 il Sr.4w9,19 4s recorded /n 9oo,C l7 if Jvivt/-ys i. 1 or/ P4'yf l9, ,Pearls of k,/79 C.ufftiq, 1 IW4sh,q fore.i r r 1I 4'non,'As-w h sss.s' U11 N N Qee Or A O 4 1 ‘ t%r, , 395.64' 1 T\ i \n a it • o I ‘' bp' R a"pro/h1/ac I \ 5ee I1t tre *o/ mi 1$1 AK 0 ,Nro A ah!{npfii4J1 85.43' r 1 AA'/1'eo'/V ilhorot road kabir ter diac11'AiSeC. ^n I 4 Inc., Ruord if Purvey I letI LOT 4 1 1 oftif Jr 1 w 45. ii h i i e g`L o :O LQT h ow orL/4' 441cw 1§ Are 1/.r Jr. - llto= 77'04coreII 843.90'W., 40.10' 1 I t ismDoNotWriteBelowThisLine f Approval is hereby granted ewkfeet'taw: CI Disapprove because: ID.P S‘ik'rcf - ii-`1Pe'. ,.... lann ate NOTE: Approval of this adjustment does not assure thee propertyropatertynd Coun owner y out - division subject property itself has satisfiedCountyTitle 19) . Plea• division requirements (ACV S8.17 and ring 1ds wPlea be advised that building permits will not be issued, e(iaa code. have not complied with the requirements of s _$ ti F-7 L-1 L. Allo/s3 JAN 20 Alga BUILDING/ZONING r . J PARCEL A - PRCPOSED NEW LEGAL That portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.V..., more particularly described as follows: Oar,Waning at the Northeast corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said section; thence South 01°16'00" West along the North-South center of :raid section 785.4 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88°17'00" West: 555.64 feet; thence North 01°16'00" Fast 392.58 feet; thence North 88°15'36" West 555.64 feet; thence South 01°16'00" West 738.80 feet; thence North 88°17'00" West 185.43 feet; thence South 45°38'29" Fast 343.36 feet; thence South 09°08'29" East 104.29 feet; thence South 89°08'29" Fast 169.83 feet; thence South 32°08'29" Fast 499.09 feet; thence South 00°51'31" West 232.97 feet; thence South 81°08'29" East 98.20 feet; thence South 11°08'29" East 181.55 feet to the South line of the Sout east Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said section; thence South 88°19'25" East alongsaid South line 445.00 feet to the Southeast Corner of the Southeast eQuarr f the Northwest Quarter; thence North 01°16'00" Fast along the East line of said Quarter 1514.75 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: EXCEPT that portion lying westerly of 120th Place S. E. and northerly of S. E. 97th StreEt, all in Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. s' t whsy, L tpd, IONAL 10 2097Z CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 31, 1985 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. RAMAC, INCORPORATED Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a one and two story self-storage building having 30,850 square feet of area to be located in a B-1 zoned district (file CUJ-062-85); located at the 100 block of Bronson Way N.E. (east of I-405 and north of Maple Valley Highway). HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). 2106Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 31, 1985 A'PLICANT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES FILE NUMBER: R-014-84 PPUD-015-84 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval of revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.06 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-84). B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Honey Creek Associates 2.Applicant: Honey Creek Associates 3. Location: Vicinity Map Attached) Located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. 4. Existing Zoning: G-1, General Use 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1, Residential-Single Family; R-2, Residential-Two Family; and P-1, Public Use 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single Family, Low Density Multi-Family and Greenbelt 7. Size of Property: 47.7 acres Rezone/Annexation 14.06 acres Preliminary Planned Unit Development 8.Access:Jefferson Avenue N.E. 9. Land Use: Undeveloped 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped East: Single Family Residences South: Single Family Residences; Hillcrest Elementary School, and North Highlands Park West: Single Family Residences C.HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject property is currently being processed as an annexation in addition to the requested land use action. D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water: There are 6-inch water lines located along N.E. 24th Street, N.E. 23rd Street and N.E. 21st Street. Eight inch lines are located along N.E. 23rd Place, Harrington Avenue N.E. and Kirkland Place N.E. All lines are near the subject property. b. Sewer: There are 8-inch sanitary sewer lines located along N.E. 23rd Place, N.E. 21st Street, Jefferson Avenue N.E., and Kirkland Place N.E. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water from the subject property flows into the May Creek Drainage System. PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER HONEY CREEK ASSOCIA FILE NO. R-014-84 AND PPUD-..,..,-84 DECEMBER 31, 1985 PAGE 2 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: METRO Transit Route #11 operates along N.E. 16th Street approximately 1300 feet south of the subject property. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: Hillcrest Elementary School is approximately 200 feet south of the subject site. b. Middle Schools: McKnight Middle School is approximately 2400 feet south of the subject property. c. High Schools: Hazen High School is located approximately 1.3 miles southeast of the subject site. 5. Recreation: North Highlands Park is approximately 1000 feet south of the subject site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704, General Use (G-1). 2. Section 4-706, Residential-Single Family (R-1). 3. Section 4-708, Residential-Two Family (R-2). F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Section 4-3014(C), Change of Zone Classification. 2. Title 4, Chapter 27, Planned Unit Development Ordinance. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1.The applicant, Honey Creek Associates, has requested a joint annexation and rezone approval of 47.07 acres along with a preliminary planned unit development approval of 72 units on 14.06 acres. The Hearing Examiner conducted the initial public hearing for the two land use requests and upon appeal the City Council has remanded the items back to the Hearing Examiner to consider the reduced scope of the planned unit development and the appropriateness of the rezone request. The City Council will conduct the 75 percent petition hearing for the annexation request. The following analysis divides the two land use requests and applies the appropriate criteria. REZONE 2. The applicant is requesting the rezoning of 47.07 acres into the following three classifications: R-2 Multiple Family Residential - 6.0 acres R-1 Single Family Residential - 29.0 acres G-1 General Use - 12.07 acres The requested rezone appears to be appropriate with certain modifications based upon the review criteria. 3.The Hearing Examiner must consider the specific review criteria under Section 4-3014(C)(1): a. That substantial evidence was presented demonstrating the subject reclassification appears not to have been specifically considered at the time of the last area land use analysis and area zoning. The property is being reviewed by the City of Renton under its concurrent annexation and rezoning procedure. The property has not been specifically considered by the City in either of its land use analyses or area zoning. Thus, it appears to comply with this criteria. PRELIMINARY REPORT T_ . HE HEARING EXAMINER HJNEY CREEK ASSOCIATES, FILE NO. R-014-84 AND PPUD-015-84 DECEMBER 31, 1985 PAGE 3 b. That the property is potentially classified for the proposed zone being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. The Comprehensive Plan Map for the northeast quadrant identifies an area in the southwest corner of the subject site as potentially low density multiple-family. The central portion of the site, where Honey Creek crosses from the southeast to the northwest, the Greenbelt designation is applied. The eastern portion of the site is again divided by a ravine that is part of the Honey Creek erosion pattern, and the two plateau areas in the northeast and southeast portions of the subject site are generally designated as single family residential. The Comprehensive Plan provides the general guideline for the development of any property. In this specific case, the primary issue is the natural slopes that exceed reasonable limits where development should be prohibited. It appears that these specific topographic features were not considered in detail during the comprehensive planning process. Instead the Comprehensive Plan generalized as its basic intent that Honey Creek bisected the property. The applicant's request generally follows the direction that the topographic details would suggest. The southwestern plateau which is approximately 70 feet lower than the adjacent established residential areas to the south and west is a reasonable area for development. The Honey Creek ravine has not only created areas of localized development on the subject site but created a problem with the availability of public services. The Environmental Review Committee in their analysis specifically limited development of this site to the southwestern portion of the subject site. Emergency services were the critical problem in that access to the eastern portion of the property was over substandard roads and the response time was outside of acceptable limits for both the Fire and Police Departments. ISSL E: IS THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE EASTERN PLATEAUS AND THE GREENBELT AREA APPROPRIATELY DESIGNATED IN THE REZONE REQUEST? The proposed R-1 area extends down the eastern slope of the Honey Creek ravine approximately 200 feet from the crest. In that 200 foot distance, the topography drops off approximately 100 feet. This would suggest a slope in excess of 50 percent which should not be built upon. The question is should development densities be granted to the steep sloped areas at an R-1 density level of six units per acre? The greenbelt policies as delineated under Section 4-745(D)(1)(b) prohibits development on slopes greater than 40 percent. Looking at the topographic map, we can see that the plateaus basically break at an elevation of 375. Land areas that are above that elevation generally have slopes less than 15 percent. Below that elevation, the slopes exceed 40 percent except in the most northern portion of the subject site where a wider bench occurs. In total it would appear that approximately 16-1/2 to 17 acres should be designated in the G-1, General Use, classification as a result of the natural slope limitations. c. That since the last previous land use analysis of the area zoning of the subject property, authorized public improvements, permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone significant and material change. The subject site has never been zoned within the City of Renton. Development has generally increased within the City adjacent to the south and west of the subject site. Weatherwood II borders the site on the west and housing developments from WWII border the site on the south. Access can be provided by extending public streets into the southwest portion of the site. PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER HONEY CREEK ASSOCl/ 3, FILE NO. R-014-84 AND PPUD i-84 DECEMBER 31, 1985 PAGE 4 d. The final test to determine whether a rezone is appropriate is to address the question of timeliness. The subject site appears to be the next incremental piece of property as the City expands eastward in this general direction. In fact, the site has been surrounded by other developments because of limitations of slope and accessibility until this time. This also extends into the realm of public improvements specifically sanitary sewer and water. An appropriately constructed sanitary sewer system has not been available until this last year. Construction of the Honey Creek trunkline now makes the rezone and development request timely on the subject site. PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 4. The applicant is seeking preliminary planned unit development approval PPUD) to allow the construction of 72 units on a 14.06 acre site. The development would include 60 apartment style units stacked in two story buildings with the remaining 12 units constructed as townhouses in the extreme southwestern corner of the subject site. The development will also include approximately 1-1/2 acres of level open space for active and passive recreation. Ultimate decision of recreational facilities has not been included because the prospective market has not reached a final determination. 5. Minimum site area required in a PUD by Section 4-2701(1) is four (4) acres. The subject site complies with this criteria. 6.The proposal must comply with a series of standards and development criteria. The applicant, at this time, is not proposing to subdivide the property for subsequent sale. 7.Approximately 40 percent of the site is retained in open space because of topography. Steep ravines surrounding Honey Creek make that area almost unbuildable for residential development. This complies with the minimum 20 percent requirement for outdoor open space. 8. Specific residential open space per dwelling unit will be shown with the final design plans in the final PUD. Most of the outdoor open space has been concentrated around the recreational activities in the southwest corner of the proposal. Approximately 25 percent of the level plateau of 9.5 acres has been retained for outdoor recreational space. It appears that, in the conceptual stage, the proposal complies with this intent, but specific detailed calculations will have to accompany the final PUD for approval. 9.The applicant has set back all of the structures so that a minimum 25 foot landscaped buffer can be provided along the western property line which abuts the single family residential area. In fact, that area will be left in perpetual open space because the roadway extension for Jefferson Avenue N.E. will bend slightly to the east and come down to service the planned unit development. The only streets crossing the greenbelt would be the extensions of N.E. 21st and N.E. 23rd Streets. 10. Building "J" is approximtely 95 feet from the western property line of the proposed project. Single family residences are located to the west of the project and Building "J" would have be located at least 100 feet from that property line or comply with the specific height and size criteria. Building J" appears to comply with that criteria. 11. Where a PUD is located adjacent to special areas such as flood plains, steep slopes, or geological hazards, additional criteria are added. In this special case, the site is specifically limited by its steep slopes. Approximately 4.0 acres of the 14.06 acre site has slopes in excess of 15 percent. The PUD ordinance specifically calls out for a reduction in density if the average slope is over 15 percent. The average slope is approximatly 29.99 percent by utilizing the slope formula (S=100 x I x L/A). PRELIMINARY REPORT T HE HEARING EXAMINER HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES, FILE NO. R-014-84 AND PPUD-015-84 DECEMBER 31, 1985 P AGE 5 This slope was determined based upon using the 25 foot contour interval over the 20.8 acres of sloped area. Based upon that calculation, the following density calculations are appropriate. Density Calculation, Slope Reduction, and Use Reduction Zoning Class Area No. Units/Acre Total Units R-1 8.06 6.0 48.36 R-2 6 12.0 72.00 SUBTOTAL 120.36 REDUCT IONS 1. Dedication 85 6 5.10 SUBTOTAL 115.26 2. R-1 for Streets/20% 1.6 6 9.60 SUBTOTAL 105.66 3. Reduction for Natural Slope 31.9%33.71 SUBTOTAL 71.95 The formula used to calculate natural slope across the site in the PUD ordinance is problematic in that dependent upon which contour is utilized the percentage of slope can vary. Staff calculations show that if we include the dedicated area for the extension of Jefferson Avenue a reduction of 29.96 percent would be appropriate if evaluated under 5 foot contours. If evaluated under 25 foot contours, only 27.3 percent would be appropriate. If the dedication area was excluded from calculations, utilization of a 5 foot contour would generate a natural slope of 31.9 percent. On the other hand if we used a 25 foot contour, a slope of 29.87 percent could be calculated. Thus, the project density on a subject site ranges from 71.95 units to 77.03 units. The applicant has proposed 72 units. This seems totally acceptable based upon the accuracy of the calculations involved. ISSUE: 12. THE PRIMARY ISSUE IS WHETHER ACCESS IS ADEQUATE TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF 72 UNITS IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBJECT SITE? The Environmental Review Committee specifically reviewed this problem and issued their declaration to allow only the 72 units (Phase I) "provided that access to the subject property shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E., N.E. 21st Street, and emergency access from N.E. 23rd Street." Primary access to the subject property shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E. The secondary access will be provided from N.E. 21st Street and emergency access will be provided from N.E. 23rd Street. Both Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 21st Street shall be built to City standards. Jefferson Avenue N.E. shall be dedicated from the southern property line northward to connect with the right-of-way for N.E. 23rd Street. The property owner shall provide a slope easement over all of the property line in between the right-of-way for Jefferson Avenue N.E. and the western property line of the subject site. The emergency access constructed with a right-of-way for N.E. 23rd Street shall be a minimum of 15 feet in width and constructed to Fire Department specifications (ERC condition). PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER HONEY CREEK ASSOCl/- _3, FILE NO. R-014-84 AND PPUD ,-84 DECEMBER 31, 1985 PAGE 6 Traffic has been reduced by approximately 30 percent as a result of the reduction in project size. The primary neighborhood concern is traffic generation and circulation. The estimated 430 average vehicle trips will access the site by going through established single family residential areas. The ERC did not consider the traffic impact as significant and require an environmental impact statement. The most interesting comparison of traffic impacts occurs if we were to propose that instead of a multiple family project of 72 units a 43 lot single family PUD was constructed. Both projects would generate approximately 425 to 450 vehicle trips per day. This is based upon standards from the Institute of Traffic Engineers. 13.The subject site still has a problem with the steep slopes and the possibility of slope instability from the initial construction. Special measures may have to be taken during construction to control the temporary erosion and revegetate some of the steeper slopes. Extensive hydroseeding may be necessary along with additional plantings and it would be appropriate for the application, during the final PUD approval, to submit specific revegetation and geotechnical plans for review by the staff and the Hearing Examiner. 14. Comments from the various City departments focused upon the problems of storm drainage, sewage disposal, and access. Since the original application was submitted early in 1984, the City has acquired the necessary easements to locate the new Honey Creek sewer trunkline along the central ravine shown running through the subject site. The City has constructed the main sewer line and maintenance roadway along the bottom of the ravine. The issue of available sewer has been resolved. Access can be resolved by construction of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and the tie-in at N.E. 21st Street and emergency tie-in at N.E. 23rd Street. The Environmental Review Committee has specifically considered plans and approved those for the emergency access at N.E. 23rd Street. 15.The ERC also required under their substitive authority, the additional following conditions: The specific type of dwelling unit whether it is a flat or townhouse style shall be specifically delineated at the time of final PUD. The applicant will provide on-site recreation in a proportion amount as originally presented for the initial 185 unit complex at the time of final PUD submission. The final PUD shall include a specific recreation plan showing the type and location of recreational amenity based upon the market focus of the ultimate development. ISSUE: WHAT RECREATIONAL AMENITIES ARE APPROPRIATE? The revised project does not detail any recreational features except for the availability of open space. The ERC held that both active and passive recreational amenities should be provided in the final development but because a specific user had not been delineated by the market that a specific recreation plan did not need to be submitted until the final PUD submission. 16. In conclusion the project appears to meet all of the PUD criteria and be in the public interest. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner recommend to the City Council the following: 1.Approval of the rezone request, file R-014-84. 2.Approval of the preliminary PUD, PPUD-015-84, subject to the following conditions: a. Submission of detailed plans in the final PUD to include: PRELIMINARY REPORT T HE HEARING EXAMINER E ONEY CREEK ASSOCIA- FILE NO. R-014-84 AND PPUD-I 84 CECEMBER 31, 1985 PAGE 7 1) all residential open spaces; 2) compliance with Building "J" with setback and volume requirements under Section 4-2709(2)(D); 3) a geotechnical study to specifically evaluate placement of buildings along bluff line. b. Detailed treatment plan for the greenbelt areas included restoration and increasing on-site vegetation to stabilize the steep slopes. c. Detailed improvement plans showing the location and construction standards for Jefferson Avenue N.E., the extensions of N.E. 21st Street, and the emergency access intertie on N.E. 23rd Street. 1111L- —"-------- PAr_tr lc, Wm.) --- , " i 4.04,1,iiii 34,,.. ,,,,.,, ‘ 1 ----.--t • 1::- ----- iHIc, QENTrN CCTV LIM.T P-1 1_,. Or C ' 1-• -- yr WI '' b• • 1 , ff•-J•" ,, i;• •. S. ' •• 3 -1 I SIERRA N(IGNTS toe r' L.1 11s':_ 1 i+ •+y "_ ° ,•• 11 ,4 ,/ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I 1. o, •r f . • I t e 1 ,•! I i ... - . .r— 11 : 11_1 rya f_. ''.'c/. al ' Inn . . . IS Ink/:::,....;' • 1 l `11IJJor I r - -- : iiss.. ;'i• H t ,o_ t I' 1 m• Iv 1 t.. 215 toe !i1 . '• .../CKS' i 1 ' II I\ \ a ( iL—• •..-.' [fi '•'- k.: 7. ?'. !. ' ' 0 I 4, I " t] i •.4., . • _. , • s;; • k• i Pim 1 J•••• • I IIIGNI ANDS --— 1f" T' I 1` : ?-1..;::—' 2 2o6- .. RA, PAP'._ ^ r i i ._ 1 I 1 li`•'. 1 I • r 11 I , .r a 1: 7• 1 •, I I„r, 1,,, ....0 , 1-1. ...pi 1 1 I?;; K 3 M is NI;,I. •• lf dCt j.1H • , o JZsc.c.,:l. 0 « r/. 1 I}}"+ I + `' p rr G—1 t-4." ", I i I 1 , I 1• ii •p. ..1 r. i 1• I 1 i Y fi wj .,1 - lit ll V-791;97 t 1 ,c y- 3 i „ 4T d It V• 1' f j ; I I. a f •• •1 d•T. r 3 0-1 42• 1 r ^• /!/ 1 1 i I(,-.i1:1' f ri-t!f 41 , . • " .•(,r lir HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES R-014-84 PPUD-015-84 47.7 ACRES REZONE APPL I CANT HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 14.06 ACRES PPUD PRINCIPAL ACCESS JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE REZONE TO G-1, R-1, and R-2 and PPUD FOR 72 UNITS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HONEY CREEK COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY, LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY, AND GREENBELT COMMENTS L.V ALn•ivv .IL.[ M111L LI / LI V Ialviv , 2C APPROVED l lAF 1VED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED S i 11/( / 7 h t-r/., 12 q y ) J Wiz- A%v C) I mac.'cE c/ f' DATE : IGNATURE OF DIR OR AUTHOR ZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 1 NOT APPROVED Sit,? 4,„/".41ma.441...0 4v, R DATE : $42-0',5/ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTIR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 In the initial review of this proposed Rezone/Planned Unit Development, the Environmental Review Committee was advised by several City departments that additional information would be necessary in the following areas: 1. Water, Water Courses 2. Traffic Impacts 3. Public Services (especially Fire) 4. Utilities 5. Recreation A revised plan addressing some of these concerns was submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on April 16, 1984. Based upon review of this plan, the following observations can be made: No development should be permitted on the east side of Honey Creek for five 5) years or until the City can provide water, sewer, and public safety services, whichever occurs first. Regarding traffic, approximately 782 Average Daily Trips can be expected to result from this first phase development. Traffic as such should not be a major problem. However, the specific access points and range of improvements must be stipulated. Related to traffic, the Fire Department has expressed concern about apparent singular access to the southwest portion of the site from N.E. 21st Street and Jefferson Avenue N.E. The revised site plan submitted indicates an emergency access extending south from the end of the proposed cul-de-sac to Kirkland Place N.E. An easement for this access must be secured and vroverly improved. VICINITY MAP y N..e ay.. ji / 7) I I-( 1 .,2r... v, ii\ yir., j 1\,:: ,,Licit--tt,r.:.,==::::: ill r H--!--10 ,;-:..-. ._s 14 \\\\\\\ 11/( 7 m".."' i 17ii '-'4': .= 1 1 \\*1 I..( 4-',7";.::;, :._,'::17 4:::— A \‘\\t / ( K1 \ H'—'71 -. L - 7/ Zi:::=\--1:l - 1 \ ‘ \ 1__,... ,1 i; I `I 1 1 1 AX \‘ \ \\ 1! 1\ 0 Misting R-1 to.. 1 .\ c ) 1 ='.. N k"I 1 11 IV\ap \ \ \ ( I ic , .1 Al2((F \ 1 4?1 i$\ 11'1f\..\ I:::- -Ti- '2:/ N* I )(Ri * t \\ ‘'',., 5-), 54 I1 \\\L24 --- --' --,0----c'N\\N .t-. 1-;-_----- --",---------------)1'--- 7-;1." d 1 r ' ) 1' 41(P) \ \\\ 7-17# 1-:! 1-Z A\ () c,I_Iti A x,\\((( 4; ' /7' E‘. \ \ 7-"' i4 IIII I\\ 1 )‘"‘','). 1i(0\t\.\,-, t`:- S ' \ \ . I1- \II) i'l ‘ 7:: . A g 1 A . s Nko .\ „ ___,._..,---- -„, 1 s,„ ,_, I\ , .\ ) . -- - - ...- _- __. ,---"\-„ — i R\lir ')S Li I \A\\,# k(( ire., 7---__ 1,;‘ 7:- . ' \ 71(,\\\". .\ (' _-)) 1 ‘.'l 11 LI e- -'-----7-7- .-::-.74r." -- 1-.7--1 (41(' '' ‘\/\ '‘•V' '' 7- -- 1( 1 l'. .1 ay„ s , .,, LL_ 4x.11:467. 4- lL C inlet*.Aseas-:i .l 0 0 in' Rr-11—} j L it— .- 1: E3M1 fC===li ; :1±210 g. ''. p [01:12:2) L.ji- J 1 / 0 r:-.rnCl`-u'UG J M ILa o.---9j VICINITY MAP I 1 li .!r ( / 7''-'- /-' ''''' --------- swrw r) ' i H 1 -7:7 . -:- ' ____ it V 1 t I \ \-. 1!,. V ( /7//' I I! \N\ / //// Z 1.. I 1 ! .t.-- J ..„._ e ""'"""" 1S' \V i , p ,,,,,,,,, 1 1 !. 1' v. ' ki ,,,, s\\\$( , ,,,,,, l'`) \ \ II greenbelt1 i \*\\\, i existing R-1:one 1 \V LOT'{'.3344 ACRES l& *' A\ \ I / i 7- vas IooT.I\ ` s \ A\ v v i,/ Ay\yy y\y \ y/////( \\, ks.- -- )\ N-\ Iiili)g3 1 r N\ l ,„\ L d v ) 2/ /4 Io , 11 c S.* 1l\,4- \\': / \' fj''i„a,K, L r l 1 G- 031111jit c,:-- s, ` \ 1 i ( (\\1 i ' 'l\ \ ` ITI ' 1"ELCi 1 A^,,. n.lwn.ln.l,_ oricm.vin„sviovei,D.11y All 1 404 .. .v\ v IAUINiSO1iti' t II\ li r . 111111 III OM WAGE FOE IQ'(°I I rVACTH.AWNEE IRCII[ AIMF1 r r,,. ki..___\ LOT .t4.00 li . N \\— 4„, ,,, , A IIii*-,,r-ii.::----k,: „__. _ I.- 7 ", ,iP'40, AV,\\\\‘, ' .‘,,i' l',\ ('' / ( 4------- 0#01,"..;..' 4,4;- ---:- --`'--- -------------,.._ ilibc' . 61\ 2' ''.. ' 71„,1, c--, ________ 40. 1' y f z,,, pro, A‘___:._......,..i.;;::__,,---7,7::- ----'—'-'41 -- '‘ ' \ \ \'\\li ----)'----"/ ---Th' 1 M t' y Tom— ,..%• 7-_,N h 0 ItsFeaea,I j AVE.NA- /;, oxIstIng R-2 zoo. N. qg Rz-L\-NRFI_,L\OL- _ i O Ll V LJ i_J 1... z Z r 111 f C t Li=)[Jf li JJU ,)L I 1JAL_.LJ I En'rkonmental Review .t ee Ap-il 25, 1984 Passe 2 The Police Department earlier noted that full development (as originally proposed) by the applicant would require an additional police car, approximately 4.5 more employees, and costs in excess of $100,000. By limiting development to the west side, these increased burdens apparently will not be necessary. An easement for a public trail along Honey Creek needs to be obtained as advised by the Parks and Recreation Department. A sanitary sewer easement is suggested as a possibility. Foot paths and basketball courts for on-site are also advised to mitigate impacts upon the North Highlands Recreational Center. As for utilities, the Honey Creek interceptor is to be installed and operational prior to issuance of any building permits. An adequate storm drainage and retention system must also be provided. The Utilities Engineering Division will review such plans and monitor construction for compliance. The subject site is located in an area designated "Greenbelt" on the City's Comprehensive Plan. Much of the site is well over the 25% slope standard. Although not in effect, the City's recommended policies suggest that in areas of 25-40% slope, development should be limited to 25% site coverage. It would appear that the schematic site plan is well within these limits. Toward this end, future detailed plans are to include boundary lines designating the limits of clearing and these should be surveyed on the site prior to initial clearing. Y 5 : 00 P .M, ON FEBRUARY 7_ 1984 EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : U`Y El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED ITILITY APPROVAL SURIEC1 10 1 nn II ATE CRIERS AIREEMENT • NATER No PlUJId PF SGN 1c e 1 Gje6 ATE CIRRUS AUREEI1ENT • SEINER J" Yl e t LISTEN IEIELIPMEIT CRAVE • RATER S (71—Xtom J-- lJ SISTEM IEVEIIPMEIT CROW • SEVER 17$°=u"n7 Rote wC7 S4c SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CRAM • RATER No SPECIAL ASSESSMEIT AREA CIAR;CE • SEVIER No so, cenrsl. A•(.. APPROVED NATER PIAM y65 4164 6441644.k.^P&I.— r i S APPROVED !AR PIAR qc.fi APPROVED FIRE MAC LOCATIONS y<fi IT FIRE KEPT. FIRE F1O11 ANALYSIS DATE . IGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REP RESENTATIVE R.' s`L7/ REVISION 5/1 9 "—"— Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 11 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED P GL i s.ft.v r S MO v Z.a /Pec_o/t s ff Vl-/Atr Tom`&GO U v , ,6 C .v v i m P,pe r D iv ii¢rrfr- ,-,Q&c f'YS7 5 N TA/A) T/726-1 J 7vS/ T/tier /1/2977//P' L Be- e 7 6 r //0 f' C?E jr //D a) fI k'C" 7h1 es, GO/,t/6- Tp ,p O 77// , 7 t/ S zr/rizrior 4 /Jo 47e Y e ,re - 7-iP.7/ S' YS %Cs7 .i i°Clu TO G E xi9L vdC_/c- (CoL,4,a ti/ sezei VW It S G'//SIeCr/.3/>rtz- rOu2Ts S//Cv -Sc v/ e o N - s 7/cATr /m,",er a.- 4/d,e17), Hi6,Ah 5 r REc cC—' Cnna4Zfujl.4 - DATE : rol- l - IGNATURE OF DIR CT OR AUTHORIZED +''EPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO Ori / 4?-16.- • I APPROVED i APPROVEDWITH CONDITIONS I NOT APPROVED Sd E; ECTToM LATI MU IMINEMENT-WATER NO LATI CONS AUMENEMT-SEWER YES (ilorKy CRE4C SEER) (Nor cAteracce v AT nu TIE) M ill IIQIBMNENT CHARGE-WATER YES I7S° 4 Pen wwrt SYS VI IMIEUIPIENT CHARGE-SEWER YES 17 se' Ka. t4 JI I l;p;IAL SINT AREA CHARGE-WATER No SPE'IAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER YES C 14c•461 CR0111+c Sit- (Nor ch ew(A1 ) AT nig s r.-+t APP tOYEY Mg PLAN YES . it VP We IMI P(MI YES , a 4 APP tOYEA FINE EMIT LOCAflONS YES Y ME KEPT. FIRE FL"V ANALYSIS YE _ ft- 4mc/eO AMP SOWS REQui w,twGrO • off$ i( WtaJ ow* 6 6O5wc16CtToqEPrflaa6(44K6 0 FieFc..)SJ I 0 I 01),IL___C DATE /4 - 7 -83 Signature of 'erector or Au horized Representative a_ 1- 9- i-„ \A \''v; N I` q\\ LOT'8':331111rEci i t.ik*, . A ) )SA.TOOTH 7,"\'' ' \ As,„ ' vi..!\s\ ko,c' v? e, N,' '\\\: A Pir \ h. ifr--( \ \ amA . f)) ri4 \ S\ 16 \ \) I 7_-_-____?.......-- ; i. ' 1 kl 11, i 3/4. *Ie.. k,\\ ir A, d i r. ems... s , , 1i . N• , , \ \ \\....____ 77-_-_______,--- 7,,,,, Y./ 1 7 -. d iilt, 4, stii,. \\ y, _ A? , z i E i ii \\, p 1 t It. ..,,It I,1 1 I I g rv\ c"/ r//(„ ten ' ,I r to,Iwo II 1, 1it V ,. 1 j, CRto FI.Tt 1\ \ 1 c% I'' - it 1 N \ , \ 1 1\, G 1 II., m - iii \* a Vaal* 40: tlks, s\ ‘'‘\ \\ 01\\4\\' 1'1111 r ® 1,`iIa.aroe Jj AfpVE IIECef.T10N. L t• it, ita 1\ i,l I r II 1 It! ! < mar"-. L'a,, i k ' • .` ''',-, '-- __- _ k1/4 ii..,\ , ., i\ \`;: 1 ter T j, c-, C c_.\.,_ t._,_ i. \ . E.1 111 t 1 it \ \, \\\,,\`-_—/,I Amp -.......- ,...--. 111 : A''''--,,_,, -,, (, 4,.. , \ ,,, s \ 1,,,,, k r.„ i —.--,-,-,,---,_ ,,, , - N-....,\ , .,,.------- r---,--,,\ \, E e.i I... L _ Z j Sam. of w 7b 6C ec o oil• tbUnp R-2 tot.. Ki ReQwirl40 Fine Foad5 E R A R11—.1' p l— ,---1ChiM o) o C Oo oJ. : ; I— -- IV Hp , i f 14# 6:: 41/1144°C4111.-1 1-.) 0..A..A.A..e.A......) t i'vez a a 3 sit'' S d-cac- L-- 6:1 41 ‘ 114--- 0-c' "1:16' 1'' 6.g•c_Je..z.,- . citr-7K.„ ///Z 6/ 9y a 6 --B M a- -f'-e. C.ovel vri end Can c, r tee- c.e-' W i- VI € p --Y.o 1C,ose...4 e 1vI e. 3 Q-,•,. .0 a cG e.SS ez6- . N5 e #q 3 rd St , 8s Y nseJ I/ — .o --Sy (dam cl-r-Aw a ece, i.e.-al oey Gi fy) A'eviewe. 4. ISti 7'a-. LCrY. t. 5-3 As part f the traffic analysis we would like the following Information: 1 . - NE 23rd Street between Harrington Place NE and theproposeddevelopmentsiteshowsaright-of-way width of 20 feet. Our question is, is this not a more direct route in and out ofthedevelopmentsite? If so, can the 20-foot right-of-way be expanded to 50 feet to match the existing roadway on NE23rdSt.? 2. NE 21st Street between the development site and the west endoftaxlot134showsonlya30-foot right-of-way. Fifty feetisneededforacompleteroadwayentrancefromHarringtonPlace. Please address this problem. 3. All access roads to the development site are to be fullyimprovedcurbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting, etc.). Confirm provisions for accesses at 122nd Ave. SE, SE 100th St. , Jefferson Ave.NE, 2lst Ave. NE or NE 23rd St. and show the limits of the access improvements. The revised proposal for the Santa/Tomberg PUD, though easier for us to serve, still presents some problems that need be addressed. 1. The narrow roadways in the existing residential area are inadequate to handle the estimated increase in vehicular traffic. 2. When the second phase of the development is constructed it will necessitate the additional personnel and district (including a vehicle). i 3. Building will be numbered - West A-B-C, etc. and East A-B-C 4. Proper security devices on all doors requiring same. 5. Adequate site lighting. 6. What is the grade % for emergency access? 107/8g i i. Capt.AlgH. Bourasa Renton Police Department REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; gr APPROVED PROVE WITH COND ITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED C4 Alf-/20"‘e-i'e 474146 4(41 /Leate2G/ 3- azae >ea,' /a41-4.€ t4t ei4-tilei-ovee_e i 4 it.e..A.a4-6-r.e_s,0,-,-1... tea" c-i- P 64.d4„ du,L li 7 44,.G6Q/ titt "--(4,-,:ezt . 64,„t GEC rvi,,, laAe ig,e,7 ,a.teot- Iry ef,41,A•d- r°1- 1-, '- SIGNAT ATIVE R)E OF IRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Iiir _._—.ram.r,,, 7 a l MEMORANDUM To Roger Blaylock - Zoning Administrator Date 9-30-85 From Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal F04^—SubjE Ct Honeycreek Rezone and Plannt Development/PPUD-015-84 our comments on the above named project are essentially the same astheywereasofFebruary2, 1984 memorandum to the EnvironmentalReviewCommittee, with the following exceptions: 1. The Fire Department has agreed with the developer to accept a 15 footwideroadaccessalongNortheast23rdStreetasproposed. This road is to begatedandtobeusedforemergencyvehiclesonly. 2 The proposed interior roadways that require more than eight percentgradearesubjecttoapprovalbyBoardofPublicWorks. 3. Gate shall be used for an emergency access road rather than bollards. JI'M:mbt 3: .. 2:- MEMORANDUM TO Environmental Review Commit e - Jerry Lind DATE 2-2-84 FROM Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal SUBJECT Response to Annexation, posal ECF - 014 -84/Rezone R-014-84/PPUD-015-84 Water Utilities Current fire flow to this area is minimal for single family residence. A water distribution main system would be required to provide larger flows for fire suppression. The average fire flow required for a typical wood-frame building just under 12,000 square feet is 3000 gpm at 20 psi. All buildings 12,000 square feet or more would be required to be sprinklered. Fire Response Renton Fire Department response to the proposed area is anticipated to be from either side of the ravine, depending on the location of the incident. Fire and aid incidents in the southwesterly portion of the development would require response via Harrington or Kirkland Avenue N.E. to Jefferson Avenue N.E. The estimated time of response from the first-in fire company located at N.E. 9th and Harrington Avenue N.E. would be two-three minutes. The response to the northeasterly portion of the development would more than likely be via Edmonds Avenue N.E. to N.E. 27th, east on N.E. 27th to 122 Avenue S.E., south on 122 Avenue S.E. to the development. Response time statistics are not available to that area at present, however it is anticipated that they would be in excess of four minutes, given the present condition of N.E. 27th, S.E. 97th, 120th Place S.E. or Devils Elbow", as it is more commonly referred. Alternative response routes would greatly increase the travel distance, thereby increasing the response time. Response time to areas along Union Avenue N.E. inside the city are in excess of five minutes at present. If this annexation Is approved, an upgrading of the roadway to City of Renton street standards should be required along S.E. 97th and 120th Place S.E. to provide safe vehicle travel. Scope of Annexation Due to the irregular boundaries that would be created by this proposal, the scope of this annexation should be increased to include the area bounded by the present city limits on the west, S.E. 95th Way on the north, and the present quarter section line depicted on the east. Emergency Vehicle Access Roadways Two means of emergency vehicle access are required for both sites. One of which may be gated or secured in a manner approved by the Fire Chief. The Fire Code requires all access roads in excess of 150 feet in length, be equipped with an approved turnaround for fire vehicles. An outside turning radius of 45 feet is required for parking or access roads. Access roads are required to be a minimum of 20 feet in width. In summary, the attached annexation and PUD is not approved, subject to changes with sulrge,,ted and revised nlnns to he ctihmitted. Access depicted on the revised site plan does not provide sufficient details to indicate how it will connect to the present Kirkland Place N.E. Additional information is needed on proposed grade of the access road. (Eight percent allowed without application to the Board of Public Works for variance.) Access proposed should be an extension of the private drive and be open to the public without barricades. Cul-de-sac with planting islands will be required to be marked "Fire Lane No Parking" unless islands are removed. Detailed water utility and other fire protection required will be made at the time of the building permit application. JFM:mbt OF R• 44 z. BUILDING & ZONING EPARTMENT Z u{L o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9fo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gr 0 SEPZE'' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: December 19. 1985 TO: File R-014-84/Honey Creek Associate Rezone FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/REMAND OF REZONE REQUEST The Environmental Review Committee did not take specific action upon the remand of the rezone request for Honey Creek Associates because the previous decision issued on July 11. 1984 was found to be valid. The rezone request had not been modified. The P.J.D. request had been modified and a separate declaration of non-significance was is:tied for that proposal with conditions on October 16. 1985. R:IB:ss 2117Z 0962N 1 1 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF- - APPLICATION NO(s).: PPUD-015-84 V DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Revised application as remanded by action of the City Council for approval of a preliminary planned unit development to allow the construction of 72 multiple family residential units on 14.06 acres. The projects has been reduced in scale from 99 to 72 dwelling units and the project area has been limited to the west side of the ravine. PROPONENT: Honey Creek Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. LEAD AG 'NCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead gency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not req ired under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This infor ation is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than November 4, 1985. You shoulci be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF dECISION: October 16, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: October 21, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Sp i g r Building and Zoning Director Policy Develo ent Direct R' hard C. Houghton Public Works Director 04` 5N FINAL DEk.„i..1TION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Aplication No(s):R-014-84. PPUD-015-84 Environmental Checklist No.:ECF-014-84 Description of Proposal:Application to rezone 48.5 acres of property from G-1 to G-l. R-1, R-2 and for approval of a preliminary PUD consisting of a multi-family condominium devel- opment having 185 housing units. This revised application is to be constructed in two phase. The first phase will be 99 units to be located on the south side of Honey Creek. Pr)ponent: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Location of Proposal: Property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on February 8, April 25, June 13 and July 11, 1934. following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton. Ronald Nelson, Roger Blaylock, Rc bert Bergstrom, Gene Williams, Jerry Lind, and others. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application EC:F-014-84 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Form, prepared by: Bob Tomberg and Mick C. Santa, dated January 11, 1984. 2. Applications: Rezone (R-014-84) and Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPUD-01 5-84). 3. Revised plans received April 16. 1984 and July 11, 1984. 4. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Building and Zoning Department, Utilities Engineering Division. Parks and Recreation Department, Ac ting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1.The project has been reduced in scale from 185 units to 99 units all located on the south side of Honey Creek. 2. Access to the subject project shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E., N.E. 21st Street, and N.E. 23rd Street. N.E. 23rd Street shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City from the project's west property line to Harrington Place N.E. Jefferson Avenue shall be extended northward to connect with N.E. 23rd Street and shall be built to City standards and dedicated to the City. Any additional property remaining west of the Jefferson Avenue extension shall also be dedicated along with said street. SI 3NATURES: Ronald G. Nelson Michael Parn ss Building and Zoning Director Administrative Assistant to the Mayor 11c X_& R chard C. Houghton Public Works Director PUBLISHED: July 16, 1984 A 3PEAL DATE: July 30, 1984 I VICINITY MAP 122 ND AVE. 1 II I I S.M. 1 1 IIII i i tic u r ; ru••r•a/xe rowER E - - i- K-TOY ERO v1( / E.-- rROrERTT { 11 %A‘y/ ne1 oMall -\ 1-/ a lll „ I•. ETA ,_/ ° / x1‘''\ t& o1' \ pil ii I __-- II 1 1\ 4 . \*4 \ \ I \---L''''' '' ''' " 1 Ai V\ \ r g 1 1. 11I g eenbelt 1 `. I1 1 ezbtin R 7zon9e1 , \IbT! o LOT B.33.64 ACRESV8.\" .'x •,s.,.•a m ,\ :- Ok aattlsTAT N \ :*.444 j) N,%, 0 N ‘R% \ ‘ \ 11/7\ P' \ \ V \\ i 7, 111 P *'""e7 -- - p00 1 lit 1ii tV 0 n.„/ 1 -;1 ' ' 0riIIt4.- 4.„,1/4 N \\,' z f , 11 rettir m--- 1 \ I Pf4e =;:•• ) , - rN\\, TL,m,,it.z:g 1 o ,,,____\)i .!. 4 t 0-AltAEWO 0( 0 xT cxeo M?s. s``!^ l N, I r TOTAL UMn` BATS W\ o-In x H,)\\W 1 , I/ rARxn:c srnxu rxovme0 k \ \ I)/ alVA2L4 %s . \ INS"vas l 7 Ill ki'ACTIVEZPASSIVERECAr'' OPENSPACE FOR 4 M WN J1/ J I; LOT'A.14.08 R 4 0• ON a\ U l teSTO' 1li, t \\ \ 7 \ \ 1 ST KED FL TS tetciiiff."7-- -"-Iv ''''‘ Th [A.,-47_, z.,,,, -;----.--- -.410' ` ' \' '''‘- 1( riFzit.,,-,..,.._-_,-",-- .,-4 , 1 \ -1:plc 1-!" 8 '\' 4 k ( A greenbelt r.. V 4l J J,-. 7-7ON 1 nve.N.e. - existing R-2 zone 1 LI.Z°\ liZ' V't.- 1 n 3 ; = Ab, i 0 u 0 P '\ zi O .D 'IOD 'IOD YeD t 0HrttA26acrs 357 Sao 1 . 579 359 MN MP NMI to RENT 1 TN gT IS 11°JZi S.E.E 96'e.a 4 I. 1 Z I IPP 7 A* ' 4 II11144 ti4fLU0gig.:Z O , IFCC I ZID!ei2 Q IMIEUM IMO S.E.‘.II:ell E.2 i If S 111eeee Nmi© meNst, t i 1E. 4 ItST. a, 10 a 1. t. .. 4 ' 114. 45 if 1p G47, 11 I. . s1 iL , 1 . o I 35 t 3 t1lrZf1IMJziJot !t t 13 u t1 10 'p EA A 54 : cres ill os w IIAu z 2 H ney eek • nnex ion 46 ` it I Z 3 f S 6 i d f " 'I m, G 7Q uj N.E. 2, 1 t fles 1,1 A X'"' a a ; 1 Villi ' I la lifta ' 1 PA1owrw I I A Ck oitC RAI ill C)° 4‘'. I // .// N.E. 20L! \\• 74 s 41.401/pit F- 1'/v/ 1ri ‘ - 1 IIVIIP© VIIIIP I v/ I`s1g 5 • ILICREST r • res : .15h N.E. 1•L ST. ELEMENTARY w I giaria", ;• ";ii it ©z SCHOOL "' z Z • I K = I KING COUNT' le N.E. 18” S3Cliiit. . © • e 2ell z t+ v ,NORTH ' a . ' l I E. 1 `1 raijoal14141N11.1 HIGHLANDS =I w AA m PARK s. I0 R 'I'OIN::. \ATAVik • LL ' III IP 11 F. I 1 T. 1~aE. N.E. iL ST. OW ISM& • • is 1 ------ I 4 , =r 1 . 1W h Oa O Ir-8S 01„ L 6 Iq-84 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION i, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE •.. r' HEARINGEXAMINERAudreyDeJoie , being first duly sworn on oath states that RENTON, WASHINGTON '',' A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELDBYhe/she is the Chief Clerk of the THE RENTON LAND USEHEARINGEXAMINERATHISREGULARMEETINGINTHECOUNCILCHAMBERSONTHE' VALLEY NEWSPAPERS SECOND FLOOR'OF' INTON, WASHINGTON ON ECEMBERJ Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News 31, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M• TA CONSIDER. Daily newspapers published six(6)times a week.That said newspapers THE FOLLOG TIN: ESHONEYCREEKASSOPETICIAT are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Revised Joint WIN land use applications for months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent, KingResidential-Singledn• to G 1, General Use, R- . g Family, and R-2. County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal I.- Residential-Two Family(file R-014-84), newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for property located In the vicinity of th6 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. King County. and 2) allow preliminary P,U.D.'multi• family development consisting of n units on 14.6 acres located on the soutt The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News I,' sin of Honey Creek (file PPUC-o15 Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and Legal'descriptions of the files not. not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its above are on file in the Renton Building 4• Department. subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a zALonin9INTERESTED PERSONS TO SA Notice of Public de a rink; was published PETITIONS ARE INVITED'TO BE PR SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING C On December 13, 1985 R1266 DECEMBER 31, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. , EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Ronald G. Nels Building and Zoning Dirac' J1 'Published in the Daily Reco(d,ChrorjThefullamountofthefeechargedforsaidforegoingpublicationisthe ,ember 13, 1985. P12.60 ..•' , sum of $ 31.19 W; y',: 7'I a/ i3,r47:eit Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of Dec is,85 C-61- 7,-:-. 621 (7Y . Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. vN re7 rt.vued 1044 OF I tiP 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 co. 2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 94,T, SEPSE O P BARBARA, Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Pat >ado 9902 126th Avenue S.E. Rent on, Washington 98055 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.F.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Mr. Sado: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Rerton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Intl rested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be avE ilable one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Rcger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R;IB:JMM:ss 2104Z.23 CIF 1? BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z WL mom9MUNICIPALBUILDING200MILLAVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09 Tt_p SEPTEMO P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Dec amber 13, 1985 Mr. Visick 124)5 S.E. 98th Street Rer ton, Washington 98055 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Mr. Visick: Th3 City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. In! erested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Bt ilding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Siicerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 21047_22 OF I? ty ,,_ ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z rnmem 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09ltFj SEPSE P BARBARE, Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Dece tuber 13, 1985 Mr. huck Youngquist 12110 S.E. 96th Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). DeE r Mr. Youngquist: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The pudic hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Utz= v C q Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R:1B:JMM:ss 21047...21 OF R4, 44 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 041 TE, SEP1Sk° BARBARA, Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. Robert & William Kobayash 2707 N.E 125th Seattle, Washington 98125 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Deer Mr. Kobayash: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zcning Administrator R.1B:JMM:ss 2104Z.20 OF R4, y 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z „IL o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09q r D SE PT EP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. Mitch Murray 2813 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dez r Mr. Murray: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above me itioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The put lic hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 2. 047_.19 OF RED y'. o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 L' co^ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 9grED SEP100 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DecE mber 13, 1985 Ms. Eva Jean Hyley Huseland Educational Trust Fund 1224 South 211th Street Seattle, Washington 98148 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Ms. Hyley: ThE: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above meitioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Re iton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, 1 '9Ce-qei Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 2 047_.18 OF R ft? Q ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORZo 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09, 4Fl) SEPT P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. .John L. Hendrickson Lucc s, Glase, Sherman & Hendrickson Honeywell Center, Suite 505 600 108th Avenue N.E. Bellovue, Washington 98004 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Deer Mr. Hendrickson: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The put lic hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, 9 , 14-,_ Rcger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R.1B:JMM:ss 2104Z.17 OF I BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z .JL RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 ..co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O91 SSEP - OA BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. Russell Bergeron 2807 N.E. 21st Street Rent on, Washington 98056 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.F.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Mr. Bergeron: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Rer:ton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Intl:rested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be avw ilable one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2.550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zcning Administrator R.1B:JMM:ss 2104Z.16 0. F R4, 4 I • 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z rn 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09 TF) SEPZE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. Amos Huseland 1916 Edmonds Avenue N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.F.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPIJD-015-85). Dear Mr. Huseland: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Bu lding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sir cerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zc fling Administrator R.IB:JMM:ss 2104Z.15 OF R4, 1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORZmill 9 WMUNICIPALBUILDING200MILLAVE. SO. RENTON, ASH. 98055 • 235-2540 06)4 SE PT ,( 4, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 T. E. Malmoe 121115 S.E. 96th Place Rerton, Washington 98056 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Sir or Madam: TN: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The pul)lic hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the B ilding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, 69-0-1e-- c) 0 Roger J. Blaylock Z ming Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 2104Z.14 OF I BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORZNAL 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 235-2540 O, S> S P TE,) SEPE BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. I3ob Lemly 6005 Hazlewood Drive S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.F_.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Mr. Lemly: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Int':rested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be awilable one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Bu lding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R.1B:JMM:ss 2104Z.13 aF RSA Q ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Zeaammo9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 9grcD SEPScke' BARBAR,A Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. ureg Diener Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.F.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Deer Mr. Diener: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Reston Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of Ci.y Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Lttiect R Jger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 2104Z.12 OF /? BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ryas '` " RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR Z "aL r4", C7. 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 0iti D SEP-Ce° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. Curtis J. Martin 3723 Park Avenue North Rer ton, Washington 98055 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Mr. Martin: Th; City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The pui)lic hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of Ci:y Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the BL ilding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, pc C) Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 2104Z.11 OF 1 oqpBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9 co tEo SEPZE‘ OOP BARBARAA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. oger Green 981f; 124th Avenue S.E. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Mr. Green: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of Ci'.y Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the BL ilding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Z pning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 2104Z.10 OF R4, 4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTORZio 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 C 91l o SE PT Eoc§- BARBARAA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. Stanley A. Huseland 120 West Market Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Deer Mr. Huseland: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above me itioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Int 3rested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Bu lding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sir cerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zcning Administrator R.IB:JMM:ss 2104Z.9 CF RpA 0 BUILDING & ZONINGDEPARTMENTc, z z RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR i arn0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 09q" 40 SEPjE ' BARBAR A Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Ms. Susan Broderick 130:>2 S.E. 104th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Ms. Broderick: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department fo mally accepted the above meitioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Reliton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The put,lic hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Bu.lding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, gi n, Rciger J. Blaylock Zcning Administrator R,1B:JMM:ss 2104Z.8 OF i do 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z iilL o 09 x MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 091t is SEP1, 140' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH 1 JIAYOR Dece nber 13, 1985 Ms. Kathleen Gormley 2820 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear• Ms. Gormley: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Bui ding and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJ3:JMM:ss 2104Z.7 OF I iv BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z NIL 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 094TED SEP1P BARBAR A Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Decomber 13, 1985 Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Oyler 212:3 Harrington Place N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Mr. & Mrs. Oyler: Thu City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of Cil:y Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Ltu Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 2 04Z.6 OF R4,. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR rn09w MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co o9 TEn SEPSc A BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Ms. Lorraine Damman 2809 N.E. 23rd Place Rent on, Washington 98056 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Ms. Damman: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Rerton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of Cit,r Hall. Interested parties may attend the public hearing. Copies of the staff report will be available one week prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R;:B:JMM:ss 21 J4Z.5 OF R4,- 1/ A, y BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT imIL o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR oo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 011 3 SEPSc03 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 13, 1985 Mr. Thomas A. Johnson, AIA Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Rent on, Washington 98055 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Deg r Mr. Johnson: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Th,3 applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have an' questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, t4,,, q, tt-r--Q's Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 2' 04Z.1 cc: Mr. Mel Easter Mr. Bob Tomberg Mr. Mick Santa OF R44 46 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o 09 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 o9 rf SEPTE P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Dec€tuber 13, 1985 Mr. Mel Easter, Architect Johr son Braund Design Group 304 \lain Avenue South Rem.on, Washington 98055 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). DeE r Mr. Easter: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hal', Thn applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sir cerely, Rcger J. Blaylock Zcning Administrator R.IB:JMM:ss 2104Z.2 cc: Mr. Thomas A. Johnson Mr. Bob Tomberg Mr. Mick Santa OF I BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR ZNAL 09 TM Qy MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O947- S E PS c_t0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Dec amber 13, 1985 Mr. Bob Tomberg 561 1 119th S.E. #2 Bel'evue, Washington 98006 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.F_.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Dear Mr. Tomberg: Th 3 City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above ME ntioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The pu olic hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. TF e applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have ary questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Si icerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator P JB:JMM:ss 2104Z.3 cc: Mr. Thomas A. Johnson Mr. Mel Easter Mr. Mick Santa OF I 4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z to 0 ammo co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0gt, SEP1ctO BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR Dec(mber 13, 1985 Mr. dick Santa 444i Issaquah-Pine Lake Road Issaquah, Washington 98027 Re: Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Deer Mr. Santa: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned revised application on September 13, 1985. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for December 31, 1985. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. Th3 applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have an questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, VC) Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator R JB:JMM:ss 2 04Z.4 Mr. Thomas A. Johnson Mr. Mel Easter Mr. Bob Tomberg 2099; NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENT ON, WASHINGTON A F UBLIC HEARING WILL_ BE HELD BY TI iE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SEC JND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON DECEMBER 31, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITION: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES Revised joint land use applications for approval to: 1) rezone 47.7 acres of property to G-1, General Use, R-1, Residential-Single Family, and R-2, Residential-Two Family (file R-014-84), property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.; and 2) allow preliminary P.U.D. multi-family development consisting of 72 units on 14.6 acres located on the south side of Honey Creek (file PPUD-015-85). Lecal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. AL _ INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 31, 1985, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : December 13, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIVE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN FIVE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. A"-TEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in hi-7-1) rJ on thece7ki day of December, 1985. C SIGNED:Yw. v 1 I -1 t I • 1 J RACirIC COAST ss1 xe » i. 3 ! i nso IVY. I I j fN I I 397 Me 404 Aoe z zo1 2•CD REN T„lJ CIT LIhLT i V E 9w.•+ 6r i P-1 ef t. z l, 12h ; r., 1ligeseeis' e1 Gi' 1 i` t", ', SIERRA HEIGHTS 203IWwt: = 9 °©©. 1 1 ,' ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 111 \ i— 1 i r•i,i s•l. 0 . . , 7Q west 1 1 .. , [ mil .,_._.t4. . , ,11 1, i,I T I I C ;.- I. i ft- . nem(Elsw '., -:.SQL r e:y3 I I a.e New Q; . 11l. Go-nlu . 3j..,,..,.. I ( otis e 1- 1 k{ ' I , t 9 s % POI.:,, 11,6__. -- . . 1.1 , , • . , .. ,I: .. • I.I:.: Oil. La/ 10, 4 I / 9 O.- ‘ 1 rtis zoe re ri• • . w• wtiCRES ,. . 1 7 ! 11 11 EI\/ 1!i"' ',,,w F' S1, • ELEMENTARY R 1 I Q( t I 'l.1J;C--- i f. • I • . I ,SfNOof JtI I 1 sS•T . ill I. d ' III I 1• NORTH [... r, I t 1 I " At I: 1Ie1. fir.` ' •, . 5IIIGhi ANDS r 1 1 • I H zl PARr. jy- i-. I,., •-„I‘•,,.,,, i 4. 1I 4 •., ,.4. I, .,.•4;' 1 E. 0Id r9:" 7:1- o:4r. $i. fit I ' lam' ",' I 5• 1 E` G` 1 I7.t, 1 MA!' • r1r„: B-1 , ' R2 R-3 1 - t IR Ill:,“ nB ,q71i•t IIr 0 I' ''' I ISCHOOL I / IIL•t ( I i r. z, 2 • CI• f! Tz• ny/ t, lt i I Z 1! > i,• r Mi r -, rum, if- t , I!I' -_, ri; " 7 • - -7,?;, . 7-- r. r-, ,, . 41' , i -!: 7 , '- =lig•--.,..,: , , , 1 Arr. , I ,, ,1: 14,„..„3 R-1 02.. 1 '`, w I I .'ITT r 0,..' Si ,' Cr.- As.. CITY OF RENTON III ZONING MAP LEGEND t.. > 1 T 4 MIN. LOT SIZE fore...ri z_ ?'_ ' i, . \tVLo P SYMBOL DISTRICT USE IN SO. FEET SCALE 1'tApprot SO( ON.) 311G-1 RESIDENTIAL-SINGLE-FAMILY 35.000 Ill R-1 RESIDENTIAL-SINGLE-FAMILY 7.200 1\O I6i e Cie_g re,/ R-2 RESIDENTIAL-TWO FAMILY 7.200 R 3 RESIDENTIAL-MULTIPLE-FAMILY 7.200 R-4 RESIDENTIAL-MULTIPLE-FAMILY 7.200 UP- i PUBLIC USE B-1 BUSINESS USE B-P BUSINESS PARKING L-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL IMPORTANT PM- P MANUFACTURING PARK CHECK EACH REZONE PAGE H-1 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ORDINANCE FOR POSSIBLE T TRAILER PARK RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 4 O-P OFFICE PARK OF Re ti Cy © c3TicE 0911 fO SEPZE. 00 City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON DECEMER 31, 1985 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING: R-014-84, PPUD-015-85 X 1 REZONE Fr o m To G-1, R-1, R-2• SPECIAL / CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT To SITE APPROVAL I I SHORT PLAT/SUBDIVISION of Lot JL. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE FROM X PLELIMINARY PLANNED WIT DEVELOP{ENT FOR MULTI FAMILY D-VELOPMENT ON THE SOU—H SIDE OF HONEY CREEK, GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATE) Ind THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVE, N.E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 0 SIGNIFICANT NON-SIGNIFICANT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING &ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOL PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT iptIR%• Z. RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 9gr D SEP“ E P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: December 19, 1985 TO: File R-014-84/Honey Creek Associate Rezone FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION/REMAND OF REZONE REQUEST The E wironmental Review Committee did not take specific action upon the remand of the rezone request for Honey Creek Associates because the previous decision issued on July 11, 1984 was found to be valid. The rezone request had not been modified. The P.U.D request had been modified and a separate declaration of non-significance was issued for that proposal with conditions on October 16, 1985. RJB:ss 2117 OF J .f 411 ell BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09gTEC SEPtE0e P BARBARA Y. ;HINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: October 18, 1985 TO: Fred J. Kaufman/Hearing Examiner FROM: Environmental Review Committee SUBJECT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES/REZONE, R-014-84, AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PPUD-015-84 The Environmental Review Committee, under the substitutive authority [Section 4-2822(D)] recommends to the decision maker, the Hearing Examiner, that the planned unit development approval request to allow construction of a 72-unit multiplefamilydevelopment14.06 acres, located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. the issue subject to the following conditions. 1. P:•imary access to the subject property shall be provided from Jefferson Avenue N.E. The secondary access will be provided from N.E. 21st Street and emergency access will be provided from N.E. 23rd Street. Both Jefferson Avenue N.E. and N.E. 2 st Street shall be built to City standards. Jefferson Avenue N.E. shall be dedicated from the southern property line northward to connect with the right-of-way for N.E. 23rd Street. The property owner shall provide a slope easement over all of the property line in between the right-of-way for Jefferson Avenue N.E. and the western property line of the subject site. The emergency access constructed with a right-of-way for N.E. 23rd Street shall be a minimum of 13 feet in width and constructed to Fire Department specifications. 2. Tie specific type of dwelling unit whether it is a flat or townhouse style shall be specifically delineated at the time of final PUD. 3. Tie applicant will provide on-site recreation in a proportion amount as originally p-esented for the initial 185 unit complex at the time of final PUD submission. The f'nal PUD shall include a specific recreation plan showing the type and location of recreational amenity based upon the market focus of the ultimate development. Under Section 4-2822(D), the decision maker must accept these conditions as binding upon his ultimate decision unless he identifies in writing a substantial error in fact or conclu!.ion by the Environmental Review Committee. The decision maker then has the option of asking the Environmental Review Committee for reconsideration or revising the recommended conditions. 2 - The applicant also has the ability to appeal these conditions directly to the Hearing Examiner under authority granted in Section 4-2823(A)(1)(a) within 14 days of the date that the DNS is published. Therefore, the appeal date would be Monday, November 4, 1985, at 5 p.m. Appeals should be submitted in the form prescribed by both the Environmental Ordinance of the City of Renton and the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, Section 4-301 1(B). RJB:ss 0966N 0962N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF- -- APPLICATION NO(s).: PPUD-015-84 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Revised application as remanded by action of the City Council for approval of a preliminary planned unit development to allow the construction of 72 multiple family residential units on 14.06 acres. The projects has been reduced in scale from 99 to 72 dwelling units and the project area has been limited to the west side of the ravine. PROFONENT: Honey Creek Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. LEA[) AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is ncit required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Res)onsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than November 4, 1985. YoJ should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Bu Iding and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: October 16, 1985 PUBLICATION DATE: October 21, 1985 Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Sprig r Building and Zoning Director Policy Develo ent Direct R. hard C. Houghton Public Works Director FORM 115 NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO.P'UD-015-84 PROPOSED ACTION REVISED APPLICATION AS REMANDED BY ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPI`1ENT TO ALLOT THE CONSTRUCTION OF 72 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 14,06 ACRES, GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N,E, POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE C E.R.C. ' HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES GJDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL CWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PRO'CIOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., NOVEMBER 4, 1985 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION MEMORANDUM DATE: October 16, 1985 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM:Traffic Engineering SUBJECT: PPUD-015-84 Honey Creek Associates Planned Unit Development 2200 Block of Jefferson Ave. NE Please be advised that this office has not had any response to the questions posed in the first review submittal by the above-referenced association. The questions as listed on the attachment are still valid. 147...- CEM:ad Attachment e yr, r., -ar .t r1 C t ...a.vt J I I s ' i»,. eitmr.ea"e. d r- DATE ; NATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 JIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : f I'0Ac c LtIG 11\:C-C2 \\1(, APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 41/dc--/1Ih.e DATE: E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 rrr-parr-or-L,Tc-L i dl i r c-dUdT-ZT3-we-wocnra time Lne r yr r uwi ng I rlrot niarr un: 1 . NE 23rd Street between Harrington Place NE and the proposed development site shows a right-of-way width of 20 feet . Our question is, is this not a more direct route in and out of the development site? If so, can the 20-foot right-of-way be expanded to 50 feet to match the existing roadway on NE 23rd St.? 2. NE 21st Street between the development site and the west end of tax lot 134 shows only a 30-foot right-of-way. Fifty feet is needed for a complete roadway entrance from Harrington Place. Please address this problem. 3. All access roads to the development site are to be fully improved curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting, etc. ) . Confirm provisions. for accesses at 122nd Ave, SE, SE 100th St. , Jefferson Ave . NE, 21st Ave. NE or NE 23rd St. and show the limits of the access improvements . I OF I BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z E. RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0, 91ED SEPSE P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1985 TO: RON OLSEN FROM: ROGER BLAYLOCK(0 SUBJECT: SANTA/TOMBERG (HONEY CREEK P.U.D. ) FIREFLOWS The Fire Department at the request of the ERC has provided a preliminary fire flow analysis for a worst case senario of the project as presently presented. The ERC would like your response concerning adequacy of fire mains and capacities in the area to provided the necessary fire flow. Is it possible? Or is it going to take a lot of off site improvements? 0„2„,---- ivpiaJ- CN gi9 - 01,r QUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME TOU.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD - i FIRE MGMTAREAADDRESSQCuL'PP I 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): r:,,,.,,, I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY MIXED NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA:GROUND FLOOR AREA: Lo t0 FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: a TOTAL BUILDING AREA: le2 DO0 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A) : 3V0 GPM (B) FACTORADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 5 0 GPM (C)5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY5 IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C):( IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) c649 GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: i/vZ 6- GPM (E) IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 6 / ADD 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST ADD 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH ADD . Q% 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST ADD J,) % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUS MENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 6?) % TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: a GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 0 5" GPM (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) r Sin e 1 1/! ipt!li i 4/' IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) r IAA:4'7 5 Q n6 O D+E+F+G) REQU I R FIRE FLOW: GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: 4 DATE L 4) -id - v ge./....,,..1 a 01' UIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTI IC TIONIO INFORMATION NAME Sdn ( 7D01QI 6A 457 U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD te'-- ADDRESS t L 2 - FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONS RUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY SOD FRAME MIXED NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND RE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA:GROUND FLOOR AREA: ‘a9d FT2 (A. NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILLDDING AREA: /a4 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE #1, USING AREA (A):JO®0 GPM (B; 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: 750 GPM (C. IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) r 4 60 GPM (D, 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E, IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH j I ADD o2 d % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST rD 74' ' ADD 0 % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH ADD zO % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST ADD /O % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUS MENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : 50 % TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: o2fi- GPM (F; 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: or 500 rPM (Q, 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: ad W/Itla ) IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 3 3 7 IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,000 GPM) 0 5 P ih er D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FL''W:C 3goa or NJoo41 i 11GPM (H, 11. SIGNED: 21;.441 4 .DATE 04 0 5' CITY OF RENTON D1JOCT1 ? 1985 DEPT. October 11, 1985 Mr. Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Honey Creek Associates P.P.U.D. and Rezone Application Mr. Blaylock: Pursuant to your telephone conversation with Mel Easter of Johnson Braund Design Group regarding the issues discussed by the Environmental Review Committee on October 9, 1985, please note the following: 1. Housing Type(s): In order to determine the type or types of living units appropriate for this site, a thorough market analysis will have to be performed. This study will consider, among other things: geographic location, area demographics, neighborhood real estate values, income levels, etc. The results of this analysis are vital to the economic feasibility of the development and to the overall success of the project. 2. On-Site Recreational Amenities: Due to the significant reduction in the total units allowed, careful reconsideration has been given to the financial feasibility of providing major recreational facilities to serve the 72 units now proposed in the southwest portion of the site. Until a thorough market analysis is done to determine the appropriate unit types, a final decision on the amount and type of recreation amenities is pre-mature. At such time that a market-type has been targeted, suitable recreation facilities will be determined accordingly. Please note, however, that at the present time a significant amount (approximately 34 acres) of forested land area will be preserved providing the opportunity for a wide variety of outdoor recreational uses. CITY O RENTUN OCT1i1985 Roger Blaylock 2- October 11, f9g5 Santa Tomberg We respectfully request that the City of Renton allow flexibility regarding both issues in these early stages of the design and review process for the reasons described above. It continues to be our goal to develop a quality project for the Renton Community. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Mel Easter at Johnson Braund Design Group, (206) 271-7200. Sincerely, Mick Santa Honey Creek Associates cc: John Hendrickson PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: / - 7- 8S- APPLICA4T: N.EV C,e.E,Et , sSc JOB ADDRESS: 2e00 i hOCi< 7 ,c•A ,E'SOR/ A-Vs. N-,E • NATURE OF WORK:q A(IM J rOOMetE,e 7 O . D. TO:Comments Due Comments Due ENGINEERING DIVISION I I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I I TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I I BUILDING CODE REVIEW i I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I I ZONING & PARKING I OTHERS I I ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please p:•ovide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION I _I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I NOT APPROVED DATE_ Signature )f Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION OT/LiT') 7k:Y I APPROVED APPROVED WIT C NDIs IONS I INOTAPPROVEDS6ee Vi41Ya, SUMECT TO LATE SENT-WATER v - LATE AMEEMENT-SEWER YN Z-l( Coati cite SE'4) (NOT CA Rtato 0 AT This TwE SYSTEM R ,$PMENT CHARGE WATER YIS 175° a PER wNrr SYSTEM IEVELSPMENT CHARGE-SEWER YE5 17 S°' Pen- u JS r cPECIAL AUNT AREA CHARGE-WATER No SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER Ye C Nem& c S ' GI*r l'''16°3 Al iw s T-le) APPROVED MAN APPROVED i MAN YES 1111 APPROVED MIIII MMRANT LOCATWIS SY FIRE DEPT. YES FIRE F'-'"a ARIALYSMS YES 4 A7AcdeO 14A' SHOWS REQUIto ,M,E.N 4.00AT 0AI S 6wNiW vy` 8E aF/wa ill( APPWAl.. ecT .7 pEVcw wear teen (tEQwlt6d F1OC- r o S I . 1 DATE 1 Signature of, Director or Au horized Representative i Nfl/v VICINITY MAP 122N0 AVE, 1 I 1 1 \ /...__ _.,,.',..AY...•,,, ,.._.._ ____. . y__L__,-- NA, --H- ,'" --Iir- M r 1`\ . I //. LIMT Y,KI,r Ilwr. Yr 1 1N.IAY.3 MOMS PPICIPSITI 1 1 7'1 ,--.. ./ , „ -- N, ,(r / existing R-1 tone ES-1 7 _L ly 1 1 Im.m. i' i ( Adiii -Ami, 1 g ii ii —7/ 11 o, I reenbelt P , 1\ 1 exl Ing 11\ I zoneit111 1 I h LOT B:03. E Z\\\\\\ N 'i° Th. \ A, 7. ' ' \k A ernmerr goon. 1 ff:. v' k -, • 41k 7( h* V\ r-------' gl N \ i\L\ P Y) l;( ) ''., 00, viv 2, EP) fir --.,r4k ;,.., , v. N- ' . 1 -il II f (r.‘ "di\ a.-=___-______---__:_-7,— y;(' STATISTICS j 131 -' 1 114 tiA*4 Th: iii ;1 tf, ;41\1 t Ciin f 7( i(z As iaj'O{ • 7r I :i ±::J 1„, p, , AA t, 1- in,,, a'-' ivar*,4,,,,42'7,‘ Yi%\'‘\:\.: N11;!Ili I PENSPACE FOR II 1R 1,^ 1J I(: 1 1 i IVE/PASSIVEREtip1)I vCIKA z__.... __,____,_____ i/ Igiilk4.0', Ncl \\1 i 1 ik Ts 7 A to. lit\rt ( arci, i I 1 ; liaks4..4# ,, ,_,__-_- ___----- 44. ,,, A\\,, \ \\ \ iy `--. / 1 / Et-ait._ A , —.77...._-..-'''' .•iiV ' ‘ ' 0 (k D 6.t itck„,.. ' N-IcWt;:- --.. - 04:1- pry.( I/k''Y' _ 7 t. . 'fir. c. v'v.- 7 AVE.N.6 : existing A-2 son. St{nr•V 0o v W 64Seo g)ti REovldio Fine FPS I z C U AIL A /LrJlflIRU r I LE112 rili i njJ U LLJv RENT JILDING & ZONING DEPJO__ NT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 014 - 84 JAN 3 1 1984 POLICY APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-MiqMV4 IT WEPT PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBERG P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT : PROPERTY, INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO -1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N. E. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT O POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P,M, ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED m APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED DATE : W72,5-/e7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZEDAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 lir 0F R4 THE CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 z pMINIM MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 90 co Ogt4-'1)SEPSE O P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR Cr( Q,:FiPNTON DATE: April 25, 1984 APR 2 5 1984 TO: Environmental Review Committee BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, FROM: Policy Development Department SUBJECT: Revised Santa/Tomberg P.U.D. Site Plan In the initial review of this proposed Rezone/Planned Unit Development, the Enviror.mental Review Committee was advised by several City departments that additio:ial information would be necessary in the following areas: 1. Water, Water Courses 2. Traffic Impacts 3. Public Services (especially Fire) 4. Utilities 5. Recreation A revised plan addressing some of these concerns was submitted to the Building and Zoning Department on April 16, 1984. Based upon review of this plan, the following observE tions can be made: No development should be permitted on the east side of Honey Creek for five 5) years or until the City can provide water, sewer, and public safety services, whichever occurs first. Regarding traffic, approximately 782 Average Daily Trips can be expected to result from this first phase development. Traffic as such should not be a major problem. However, the specific access points and range of improvements must be stipulated. 0 Related to traffic, the Fire Department has expressed concern about apparent singular access to the southwest portion of the site from N.E. 21st Street and Jefferson Avenue N.E. The revised site plan submitted indicates an emergency access extending south from the end of the proposed cul-de-sac to Kirkland Place N.E. An easement for this access must be secured and properly improved. Environmental Reviei nittee April 25, 1984 Page: 2 The Police Department earlier noted that full development (as originally proposed) by the applicant would require an additional police car, approximately 4.5 more employees, and costs in excess of $100,000. By limiting development to the west side, these increased burdens apparently will not be necessary. o An easement for a public trail along Honey Creek needs to be obtained as advised by the Parks and Recreation Department. A sanitary sewer easement is suggested as a possibility. Foot paths and basketball courts for on-site are also advised to mitigate impacts upon the North Highlands Recreational Center. As for utilities, the Honey Creek interceptor is to be installed and operational prior to issuance of any building permits. An adequate storm drainage and retention system must also be provided. The Utilities Engineering Division will review such plans and monitor construction for compliance. The subject site is located in an area designated "Greenbelt" on the City's Comprehensive Plan. Much of the site is well over the 25% slope standard. Although not in effect, the City's recommended policies suggest that in areas of 25-40% slope, development should be limited to 25% site coverage. It would appear that the schematic site plan is well within these limits. Toward this end, future detailed plans are to include boundary lines designating the limits of clearing and these should be surveyed on the site prior to initial clearing. RENT UILDING & ZONING DEP ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) PROPONENT : HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE :SANTA/TOMBERI, P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 fl'O G-1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION :LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 n ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ci UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 1 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT n OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED 7 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 1 PPL/c,iit)T S /710ciL0 ,P c"p r)S/,o 4t-fX 4:1 U U C f, 6 C:^ ti y i--N/' C T" D A) " 7/ '/ t1 1=A76C _Y.57- 7,S m /N r/4/,) 7-/71& $ 7u S/ 77 rig- /ii/ 7-7iJQ/f L .8 v7 G F . //O,UC--Y CRez , h/ico i9.e6 7//er 6-0/Rio- To v o i;//) E71.S L/r>4=7v r /=d 4- 7gEngre /moo ivy- e 'f ,ram Tin/ f YS /Erl'r7 b rc--.i/ TO G f '/f t ve C/L (Cock zgL% ew f iv' r"/9.- ( J6-rzei z-/tie G1 eniG tiT% T7 4 7L S `-4 6?//-5/ c.r/' z z.- C'd u/ 7's S//O vc-o ,s 6:- v v//0 L-Tdo 0 A) -- S /7 z To p7 /7/6/1 T /rw c r o,1 iVc iv f/74-.lac 5 bijinnti7 ' l c., DATE : ` a fr l - 1/ IGNATURE OF DIRECT OR AUTHORIZED EPRESENTATIVE Um muin 4\ 1 SullZ G Ni ( 5 dL4PSci /s )10 S y 9ION 5/188 RENTC UILDING & ZONING DEPAr ENT t DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 014 - 84 APPLICATION NO(S) ; REZONE (R-014-84) , PRELIMINARY P.U.D. (PPUD-015-84) r PROPONENT ; HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLI: :SANTA/TOMBERC P.U.D. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO ANNEX 48.5 ACRES OF BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ; PROPERTY INTO THE CITY OF RENTON; APPLICATION IS REQUESTING TO REZONE SAID PROPERTY FROM G-1 rT0 -1, R-1 AND R-2. APPLICATION IS ALSO REQUESTING FOR APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY P.U.D. OF A MULTI-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT HAVING 185 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION ;LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE N.E. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 2-8-84 n ENGINEERING DIVISION pi ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ri ul ILITIES ENG , DIVISION l l FIRE PF`EVENTION BUREAU PARKS RECREATION DEPARTMENT I ( BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Fi POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 ( OTHERS ; COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M . ON FEBRUARY 7, 1984 REVIEWING EEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; GG.• 1APPRO\iED APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS 1-1 NOT APPROVED 04 /14470.0-1V-4°( .474-146 444.4e 4,00.0.0 al.1.Z. AL,- / 444411e deb A"te--e i i- ii,( 46"%-‘-es °a-"Al- 1147-; /friedi 441/Ated /74G gel:4119 ...-t at 4494tee4E, 0,Aaw.aer eitl fe-7‘. di‘eA04,,.4, dif.".f. aaic ,4 epjA, 41,4e Ate/ 0.4.44_ lin. e4sai4.4. zia°11-, gl-e,"-t1-4f-vr-----DATE ;3/--el SIGNAT RE OF/OIRE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Q6L.0 REVISION 5/1982 i y410 Adilh The proposed development of this area gives great concern to the Police Department for the following reasons. 1) Roadways now existing cannot handle the large influx of traffic that this project will generate. 2) Accessibility to the area will greatly hamper the law enforcement task due to the deep ravine and no motor vehicle crossings from one group of buildings to the other. SCENERIO: Officer A is charged with the responsibility of providing police services to the R-7 and is in the easterly-most group of condos when he receives a call to the westerly group. He must exit the area via SE 100th to Union and then to Sunset to NE 12th to Kirkland Avenue NE to Jefferson and the entrance to the westerly portion of the project. I feel that this is entirely unrealistic and places both the officers and citizens in an undue hazardous situation. If this project becomes a reality, I will recommend that an additional patrol vehicle be manned and placed in service in the Highlands area. This will necessitate 42 additional officers (to cover 24 hours) a vehicle and all equipment. MEMORANDUM To Roger Blaylock - Zoning Administrator Date 9-30-85 From Jim Matthew, Fire Marshal Subject Honevcreek Rezone and Plann d Unit Development/PPUD-015-84 Our comments on the above named project are essentially the same as they were as of February 2, 1984 memorandum to the Environmental Review Committee, with the following exceptions: 1. The Fire Department has agreed with the developer to accept a 15 foot wide road access along Northeast 23rd Street as proposed. This road is to be gated and to be used for emergency vehicles only. 2. The proposed interior roadways that require more than eight percent grade are subject to approval by Board of Public Works. 3. Gate shall be used for an emergency access road rather than bollards. JFM:mbt OF R4, 1,1 ty 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z o 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co 09gr D SE PI°' 1 P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAY)R IL DATE: SEPTEMBER 24, 1985 TO: REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS OEIS 2 .5 4G&" FROM: ROGER J. BLAYLOCK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR( ,> SUBJECT: HONEY CREEK REZONE/R-014-84 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/PPUD-015-84/REVISED PLANS Honey Creek Associates have submitted revised plans per City Council instructions to the Hearing Examiner. The project has been revised in the following manner: 1. Reduced proposal to Phase 1 only. Reduced the total unit count from 99 to 72 units by eliminating the 3rd floor of buildings A through F and one townhouse unit on Building J. 5. Reduced the parking stall count from 146 to 114 parking spaces. 4. Eliminated the swimming pool, tennis court, and tot lot. Open space was increased for active and passive recreation. 5. Modified plans to show N.E. 23rd Street as emergency access only. Previous departmental comments have been attached for your review. New comments on the proposal must be submitted on the bottom of the same review sheets. Comments should be back no later than Thursday, October 3, 1985. I;/N E VICINITY MAP I I) lik), .. .(..(/ 1. E.-,. / NO nv. 11 I 1 am//• r / r Ii . .. il Po-....r ldmw ro.a. C r. oran 1 a t : \\ xfainy R-1 son. i L, ir^— I /// i \ p ......... Ue i 11 I L.........i. n, v\ 1 xb\ \ 7 111 1 I 11-1 sen. for s:aa.f>la AcRRsV 7-: k P ( ) 7 \ T37" 1 . t' N' t......• k N v.\ \\\, 1 v N.... _., N 6. .' . 4It 0\ \ \pr \I; ti ,. \\ ). \, P 104, 4%, \% \I , , 7,________ Th , I 1 )ilirif'll to.,t, ,- N ‘ ., * z, E 1; 1. lip: fie4. )))1,, . ,._ _4\\ ,_,___-_-_,_____, 1, Eil \ti i 44° . ' )\\\' ,,,‘,': ' 7-. ---'(" Z.i' lilika, E S ,; I: Cl ' @- 111i- w-° ir STAtx •FIAT! I2, TTAL M1l1 cw.ln-eau-uai, E. i' E -1 . \\\I: 1 mow„ N - . 4: v 1‘ fr') Eil I` ACTIYx/A..IY.IIECINII_Akiii_p v'';`]/ upivLOTA.14.0a 410\tillS itli Ai1TKEDFi ff-( v.:).:! 8STL 41171ii(V C 141-1 il fri( CCEv4:1#44 77'-----------_=_:__---- - 1 1 k i,\ J%-- ittet41. 1_- .• ,-tom ; 4itd) (1 r... 6..,® 4010.10.,„`,_:•- tillisk, iiTiVE z=e-.4-01X 1 ' I 71------'-- [ ' t q11, w, ,gr-- 1`74. -_—_ - w 7_, 4( . ‘ t., gr..ninst i Z*mobil,R-2 sons RZ-z\RT- rrl Q L - . ICnM1 o - i = Pt,% L=J-_--VL=)L=JCilLED) o 'o. 2 ,0 . o I cwuu`7.'w'-o' D , ,_OL VICINITY MAP 122 NO AVM. Ufa. 1 1 IIii a;I•,• ice '"' I ,.. r tic rr'Shegr+ed / Tow::.R1HL j I (/// / f xlainp p-7 zone Il l; i " __ -Lk IS P.. I III _•\` \i . k. s , c( ,lie: 0. , : 10, • _ :)( c,t 1,, id,'„11 3401.0.- ha ' li _ i s av twe iNv\\\ • 1, f I 1 SIINMORt V i k \1\ : • 'IP . : it : 0 b O 1 ,_._, 77..1 .xat a-1 Rene A ,,-..- N 404, 41‘., 4 w 'E- L•I'l -•1.1 • .- ',, •; rs.,rhr, vx. aMrtv1 1„t,,\ I i %... li, vt ..;''. ' 4, ,A1144,5* _, t,, N poi: 0.10%,..,-,..., ) N 0 \ 1,,,,,,, , y It, 21,),,, \ t,..... .. low_ ____ s4.-...-, • __-. , /, , \\,\ t-- P•k, Av-, y 04,149- . 5- .) Ot\q,, i i) r,„„; Its: t# C 1 r0111111r:. ,st 10, , ie. ___"----="------ 7--__) t\ I a RI k1 4 1 i ii i : 11/4, , 11attVit44N1k.•\ V\ 1. i7 1 1 N"\ IIIfiiv , I 1 mrren•hci, t t L i L "/ l • , 4 1 jail LN \ i It 4 A, , V\ 7t 1%. ' ti i P*1:I li'. 1 r alri irivi _._1', r, ,,\ , ,\\,\‘ i ' ,, ‘A,,, ,,,„, :,, 1, _ C.; r , t \ 1 / $ i%d110- 'N .' i -i IIIP * \ \ \ 041),..4 - ,*() % \‘,,,, 0 ( 7rc440v-N. --__,,„: _—... ____ • * .* i ' // I/ ) 1( c 1 , m,1..._. - ___ ------ A ill ( 1 \ (‘‘..,I11 "7c 14. ildip JEFFERSONai i AVE.N.U. - existexistingM C p-2 xo c fir` 1A1 1 E: 31.. ONelZ2- ML---'-- 1 '(' 1 r- ED 1 LC)) F)-\ o), 1L=J— J,J 1 I O 30 SO 100 0 EEO 1 e ` aLl .J sOJLJ `J 9 LJ V SCALE:r•eo'-O. JohnsonBraund design group p.s., inc. architecture, engineering &planning consultants CITY OF RENTON 10 , ll ‘ 51.1 SEP 13 1985 _---/ September 12, 1985 3UIL.D Nt!;2C,NiNG DEPT. Mr. Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Honey Creek Associates Our Project //83-47 P.U.D./Rezone Re-submission Roger: Attached please find (4) sets of the revised P.U.D. (development) plan, updated density calculations, zoning plan and site cross section with landscape concepts. Additionally, please find a super K reduction of the revised P.U.D. plan. Following is a list of the revisions to the above referenced plans: 1. Reduced the total unit count from 99 to 72 by eliminating the 3rd floor of buildings A through F and one townhouse unit on Building J. 2. Reduced the parking stall count from 146 to 114. 3. Replaced the swimming pool, tennis court, and tot lot with an open space area for active and passive recreation. 4. Added the new lot line with corresponding areas for each new lot. 5. Added the N.E. 23rd Street emergency only access. Following are changes to the environmental checklist. The numbering system corresponds to the checklist form: I. Background 6. Reduced the total unit count from 185 to 72 units and eliminated the formal recreation amenities. II. Environmental Im pacts 2.(a) The now reduced traffic volumes will decrease automobile emissions from the previous proposed development. Architecture, Enginccring &Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L.Allwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton, Washington 98055 206)271-7200 (206)623-5732 DF RRENTON ER U SEP 13 1985 Mr. Roger Blaylock 2- September 12, 1985 Santa/Tomberg 3.(b) The reduced number of parking stalls will in turn reduce the amount of surface water runoff by providing more pervious surface area. 4.(a, c) The elimination of 32 parking stalls along with the pool, tennis court, and tot lot will increase the potential to preserve existing vegetation and/or provide opportunity to introduce a greater amount of new flora onto the site. 5.(a, c, d)The overall impact on fauna species and quantities should be decreased due to the increase in vegetative cover, both existing and introduced. 11. The impact on the population growth rate will be significantly reduced as the development will add only 72 units, down from 185. 12. The project will affect housing availability by the addition of 72 residential units. 13. The traffic impact on both the surrounding community and the site itself will be greatly reduced. The numbers in the Traffic Impact Analysis" indicate the vehicle trips generated by this development will be reduced from 1,480 to 576. 14.(a, b, c, d) Due to the elimination of the active recreational amenities pool, tennis court, tot lot), a more significant impact may be felt on local parks and recreational facilities. The impact on schools as well as police and fire protection will be reduced. It is our understanding that we can expect a public hearing date approximately 3 weeks after the 7 to 10 day City Staff review period. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP P.S., INC. Md4)c.7 Melvin R. Easter, ASLA Landscape Architect Enclosures cc: Bob Tomberg John Hendrickson OF RA,A o THE CITY OF RENTON U ,Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 15 co• CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 O, 9gT O SEP1 - 1?) P CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNCTY OF KING ) ss. MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 29th day of August, 1985, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed an placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail, to all parties of record, a true and correct LETTER TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD CONCERNING RENTON CITY COUNCIL ACTION OF AUGUST 26, 1985 CONCERNING HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION TO DISMISS REZONE AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT R-014-84 AND PPUD 015-84. Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 29th day of August, 1985. l/ / Notary Public , and for the State of Washington, residing in Renton Chuck You; List 12110 SE Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Visick 12405 SE 98th Street Renton, WA 98055 John L. Hendrickson Lucas, Glase, Sherman & Hendrickson Pat Sado Honeywell Center, Suite 505 9902 126th Avenue SE 600-108th Avenue NE Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98004 Eva Jean Hyley Huseland Educational Trust Fund BobTomberg1224South211thStreet 5611 119th SE, #2 Seattle, WA Bellevue, WA 98006 Mitch Murray RogerGreen2813NE23rdPlace 9818 124th AvenueSERenton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 Robert & William Kobayash Curtis J. Martin2707NE125th 3728 Park Avenue N. Seattle, WA 98125 Renton, WA 98055 Thomas A. Johnson, AIA GregDienerJohnsonBraundDesignGroupJohnsonBraund DesignGroup304MainAvenueS. , Suite 200 304 Main AvenueSouthRenton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Mel Easter, Architect Bob Lemly Johnson Braund DesignGroup6005HazlewoodDriveSE 304 Main Avenue South Bellevue, WA Renton, WA 98055 T. B. Malmoe Lorraine Damman 12105 SE 96th Place 2809 NE 23rd Place Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Amos Huseland Mr. & Mrs. WayneOyler1916EdmondsAvenueNE 2123 Harrington Place NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Russell Bergeron KathleenGormley2807NE21stStreet 2820 NE 23rd Place Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Mick Santa 4444 Issaquah-Pine Lake Road Issaquah, WA 98027 OF RA,A o THE CITY OF RENTON fr z S MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR MAXINE E.MOTOR, 90 o- CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 09gTFO SEP1E OP August 29, 1985 To: ALL PARTIES OF RECORD Re: Renton City Council action of August 26, 1985 concerning Honey Creek Associates Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision to dismiss Rezone and Preliminary Planned Unit Development R-014-84 and PPUD 015-84 The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 26, 1985 concurred in the Planning and Development Committee report reversing the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 7, 1985 (which had dismissed proceedings) and remanded the matter to the Hearing Examiner for consideration by him on the merits. The Planning and Development Commitee report recommended that the City Council find the dismissal of the applications was improper as a matter of law because of lack of notice required by City Code Section 4-3013(E) which amounts to a denial of the applicant's right of due process. The report also stated that the Hearing Examiner's finding of lack of diligent prosecution by the applicant is moot because the applicant has now received approval of the lot line adjustment from King County. Finally, the report stated that duplication of proceedings which will exist by reason of the previous remand of the application by the City Council will create some confusion in the record, however, such confusion is not sufficient justification for dismissal of the application. At the time of scheduling of R-014-84 and R-015-84 before the Hearing Examiner, all parties of record will be notified of the time and date of the proceedings by the Building and Zoning Department. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk Renton City Council 8/26/85 Page four Audience Comment continued The Luckey Company Councilwoman Keolker commended City Attorney Warren for Victoria Hills) his assistance during the appeal process, and thanked continued Councilman Reed for replacing Councilman Stredicke on the Planning and Development Committee during review of this matter. Councilman Stredicke had excused himself when challenged by the applicant 's attorney for possible violation of appearance of fairness doctrine.) AUDIENCE COMMENT Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE, #2, Bellevue, requested the continued Council to advance to Planning and Development Committee Advance to report regarding the Honey Creek Appeal . MOVED BY MATHEWS, Old Business SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF Honey Creek Appeal BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT R-014-84, PPUD-015-84 COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Stredicke Development presented a report regarding the appeal by Honey Creek Committee Associates of the decision of the Hearing Examiner on Honey Creek A eal 6/7/85 to dismiss the applications. The Committee found R-014-84, PPUD-015- 4 that dismissal of the applicants is improper since lack of notice required by City Code Section 4-3013(E) amounts to a denial of the applicant 's right of due process. Further, the Hearing Examiner' s finding of lack of diligent prosecution by the applicant is now moot because the applicant has now received approval of the lot line adjustment from King County. Finally, the duplication of proceedings which will exist by reason of the previous remand of the application by the City Council will create some confusion in the record. Such confusion does not justify dismissing the application. Continued Therefore, the Committee recommended that the City Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner of 6/7/85 which dismissed the proceedings, and remand the proceedings back to the Hearing Examiner for consideration of the merits of the application. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Lincoln Property Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue S. , representing Renton Hill Landscaping - Community Association, requested a status report on the matter Renton Hill of landscaping installation by Lincoln Property Company at its development on Grant Avenue S. , constructed three years ago. Mayor Shinpoch explained that the developer was required to install the landscaping, and the condition was assured by the requirement of a bond, which the city will call if the developer does not comply. She will research the timing of the matter and notify Mrs. Larson. Mayor Shinpoch also advised contacting the Pacific Institute in response to an earlier suggestion by Mrs. Larson to find a positive solution to the cruising problem. A response is forthcoming. Fire Department Sanford Webb, 430 Mill Avenue S. , expressed concern regarding Response and fire hazards as a result of dry summer to apartment buildings Training Center located close together. He noted emergency vehicles have difficulty in maneuvering at the top of Mill Avenue South on Renton Hill due to limited turnaround space. Mr. Webb questioned City expenditure of $15,000 to study possible construction of a local fire/police training center when a training facility is already in operation in North Bend. He also felt the City of Renton is too small to warrant FBI training for its police chief. Mayor Shinpoch advised that the Renton Fire Department is a fully-manned professional unit whose members are in constant training to handle all types of emergencies. She noted that response drills to intentionally set fires are common in the program, turnaround radius is required on City streets to provide space for emergency vehicles, and fire hydrants are visibly marked for access. The proposed training site, a consortium of the four valley cities (Kent , Auburn, Tukwila and Renton) , will expand upon training offered by the state-run North Bend facility, which deals mainly with hazardous waste and chemical fire emergencies. The distance to North Bend has been computed, and it has been determined that a local facility, structured to meet training needs for day-to-day emergencies, is more cost effective for the City. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council Members FROM: Planning and Development Committee DATE: August 22, 1985 RE: Honey Creek Appeal R-014-84 and PPUD-015-84 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of Honey Creek Associates from the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 7, 1985 dismissing the above referenced applications. The Committee finds, and recommends that the City Council find that the dismissal of the applications is improper as a matter of law because of lack of notice required by City Code Section 4-3013 (E) which amounts to a denial of the applicant ' s right of due process. Further- more, the Hearing Examiner' s finding of lack of diligent prosecution by the applicant is now moot because the applicant has now received approval of the lot line adjustment from King County. Finally, the duplication of proceedings which will exist by reason of the previous remand of the application by the City Council will create some con- fusion in the record. However, such confusion is not sufficient justification for dismissal of the application. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the City Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner dated June 7, 1985 by which these pro- ceedings were dismissed, and remand the proceedings to the Hearing Ex- aminer for _consideration by him on the m- s. Ric . d Strg. cke, Chairman Kathy Ke• ker, Vice Chairman 4• . 14. 71t l Nancy Mat#gws TV OF RENTON JohnsonBraund r SEP131985designgroupp.s., inc. architecture, engineering & planning consultants BU;LDiNG/ZONMNG DEPT. September 12, 1985 HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES DENSITY CALCULATIONS - LOT A Gross Site Area: 14.06 Acres (R-1:8.06 Ac. + R-2:6.0 Ac.) Net Site Area: 11.81 Acres (Minus public street dedication and 20% of R-1 for streets) Formula: S (slope) = 100 I L A 100 (25) (6420) 16050000 31.2% AverageSlope11.81 x 43560 - 514444 - 31.2% - 15% = 16.2% x 2% = .324 R-1: 8.06 Acres - .8 Acres (dedication) = 7.26 Acres 7.26 Acres - 1.45 (20% for streets) = 5.81 Acres 5.81 x 6 Units/Acre = 34.86 Units 34.86 x .324 = 11.29 Units (reduction) 34.86 - 11.29 = 23.57 Units (net total) R-2: 6.0 Acres x 12 Units/Acre = 72 Units 72 x .324 = 23.33 (reduction) 72 - 23.33 = 48.67 Units (net total) 48.67 (R-2) + 23.57 (R-1) = 72.24 Total Units Architecture, Enginccring &Planning Consultants Lawrence S. Braund, P.E. Thomas A.Johnson,AIA Greg L.Allwine,ARCH. 304 Main Avenue South, Suite 200 Renton,Washington 98055 206)271-7200 (206)623-5732 Pr J tetiAv• Qr Mr. Tim Hill 15 May 1991 King County Executive King County Courthouse M . Hill , T ank you for your letter of May 13 affirming receipt of my 1 tter and assignment of inquiry to Mr. Tanaka. I think that you should know that the portion of the road shown i photo 2 of my letter has caved in more and a new break in the s wer line has occured. The city of Renton and the state D partment of Ecology have been informed. I am sure that the flow of raw sewage into May Creek will be stopped, however, the problem of poor engineering and construction remains . It is o ly a matter of time before another break will occur and fulirther jeopardize the ability of May and Honey Creeks to support native salmon populations. I look forward to receiving Mr. Tanaka' s report. Si cerely, THOMAS B. MALMOE 121.05 SE 96th PI Renton WA 98056 cct P. Tanaka, Dept of Public Works Renton City Council Bruce Laing, King County Council member CITY OF RENTON MAY 0 1991 c...(11 V .N. SL RECEIVED OITY CLERK'S OFFICE a ..ellatmo, 96fii 0 E. c, P N • s) 9sciA t,• r ,q 7 .4_3 k)sOt PIQLk 1)4 Cl 3O1.33O S,>1 33:.O IJ.,`' C13A13:173t 0661. 1, I. 090 NOi. Ski U Ain is - 2 .0.;.. . r^.., v,r4 ' $ a,. ,4.- w,L e; J.v 1 .,, , c ,., f 1'v. .q W. •Y}.' A 43,j ;: ..1 f r. vim • aAdM210" ® Nrr77wylet no aNb ,gv.32 _ 5.1..: eau NOI1dS2 311NO3 _, NO'I da 3` W003:21 1100 C _.`.-_ - - r r r, T, R 7 0-1 CJ. 1 '0' 1,' 1 .. ?.' w0 11 4 • 1,7 r't; . NOl ld. V 'i QO r CJ n Q >; r .4 tides I A -`>fie "".t dG t,rj' 7 2,,,,,,...,, i,„:„...,.,,..,...: ... . .. ofyy gz .fy,;(4 .f?) op 4 4 s., k r. cd.a .•t 11 it ,,s„" V,I i .__ LL f Y? r 4 CONCURRENCE DATE ? j-CD 11 y , c c' NAME l INITIAVDATE 1,v o C s December 3, 1990 Michael Hanis Hanis and Olson, Attorneys at Law 3900 Fast Valley Hwy, Suite 203 Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: HONEY CREEK PUD PROJECT EMERGENCY ACCESS ISSUES NORTHEAST 23RD STREET Dear Mr. Hanis: This letter responds to your letter (attached) regarding Honey Creek PUD project emergency access issues (N.E. 23rd Street). Please be advised that although a conceptual sketch was submitted by the project proponent, and use of the 23 foot wide city right-of-way was approved on a conceptual level at both the City staff and City Council level, there exists no "City approved plans" for this project. There has also been no construction permit issued which would allow construction in the City right-of-way. In order to obtain a construction permit to build the emergency access road, the proponent must formally submit to the City a complete set of design drawings, usually as a part of his building permit application. The City Planning/Building/Public Works staff will then review the design drawings in detail to make sure the proposal is consistent with City Code and good engineering practices At this stage, buildability of the proposal will be examined. The Planning/Building/Public Works Department commonly requires an applicant to obtain temporary construction easements in cases where it is apparent that construction will not be possible without encroaching upon neighboring properties. Only upon Planning/Building/Public Works approval of the design drawings (and mylars must be signed and stamped by the appropriate City Division Managers before they may be considered "approved"), can the applicant obtain a construction permit. No work is allowed in City right-of-way without a construction permit. As we have stated, the proponent of the Honey Creek PUD project has not yet formally submitted design drawings for City review and approval. Although the proposed use of the N.E. 23rd Street right-of-way as an emergency access had been approved in principle, the applicant must go through the plan review and approval process before constructing in the right-of-way. The City intends to uphold the property rights of all adjacent residents during plan review for this project. The project proponent will be required to obtain any needed temporary construction easements. If the proponent is unable to procure such easements, it will be his responsibility to change his proposal or alter his design in such a way that the property rights of the adjacent property owners will not be violated. Honey Creek PUD December 3, 1990 Page 2 Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Very truly yours, Gregg Zimmerman Plan Review Supervisor cc: Larry Warren, City Attorney Jim Hanson, Development Services Manager Mel Wilson, Transportation Systems Manager Joe Armstrong, Transportation Systems Clint Morgan, Plan Review CZ/tp011honcrk k...00-i—oaiii.N. i-iiiii—a••••••• - r--- 4ANIS WLSOIN RECENED // .3-1ge - ATTORNEYS 'AT: C A W CiTl OF'RENTON ' ' • MICHAEL M.HAMS 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY.SUITE.20: GARY O.Ol.$ON RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 MAR1ON G.M.LEACH CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED 206) 251.-9313 ANNETTE DELGADO, LEGAL ASSISTANT • "' FA)((206)'251.0546 Via Facsimile ran'smi.ssion NOV - 6' 1990' • and Certified 'Mai•1 DE'VELOPMENT SERVICES • • FSNISION Nov mbe.r .1 , •19. 0 • May• r..Earl Clymer - ' cit., of ,Renton 200 Mi11 Ave So ' ti • • .. Renton , W.A, 98056 ' .. ' ' . ' : ' • • Attention Sandy }lal•es - Secretary to Mayor Re.:. Honey Creek-PUD Project' "4 ,. De r Mr , •'Mayor.. Th s 'off ice represents .the Hiramat;eus ,• the Cormans , . the •hurrays , ' an. the Coopmans with regard *to the' Honey: Creek. PUP Project . My , cl ents 'have ' requested that. z contact' -. the ' City regarding • • • potential encroachment on their, •• properties ,,by` • the developer of the project ,,' :•; • The City-approved .plans• for emergency' a; cess•• on N ,E . 23rd Street call for •retainin'g :walls, and bulkheads ,' ;on ,,.both•.. `•.the north and ' south ' sides of•..••• the street • • in the ' ,:area. , between, my clients ',,• prppert i es , .the `emergency access.. as.. : des i gna'ted . i s already of, :. • , ' substandard wi"dth•'t.:with ' in.suff.ictent right-of-'way , so the plans show the support .*: ..structures : being located • tight against 'my cllients ' :propery .t 'li.nes . Atl the , council meetings • at which, this issue ' 'wa's discussed , my . • clients pointed ' out the near impossib•ility.•• bf. constructing the substantial euppo.rt ' structures • necessary . •,to .... the access road N4thout encroaching on their properties..• . The ' City' made no response . T e developer, .is , now making plans .to commence 'c.opstruction based u on the City-approved *plane .• •• This • . letter•••• is• • to place .all ' p rties on 'notice that ' any 'encroachment on, -my clients ' properties i, not ,approved • -and will,. 'be ubnsiclered and ; ,challenged as a • . trespass . . They expect .the Renton Police, Department authorities • • . to support them in.. preventing and . abating any • trespass that' occurs i re, • — ? 0 FR I 1 4 1--11.1N I S : L Lc LIri, Mayor Earl Clymer • Nove ber 1 , 1990 Page •Two • . The 4 i.ty ' s role ' in this. :niatter is ex.treMely delicate . The City has approved. plank that require ; . 'as , '' a practice l matter , encr •achment• o'n'• :my clients ' properties'„dur;ing construction . The City. was Informed ;emphatically 'that no :permission has been given for = ny ...such encroachment ' Even .so ,• .the •City' approved the plans for he project .' . The City should : now. "eicercise great care in assi -tins Its citizens in ,•protecti.ng` •• their ' private property . rights 'under .c,ircums•tances that might, otherwise • suggest that the Cityl :itself may be inse'nsiti.ve to , those property. rights . I 'm aware •.that • other ; municipalities . ...in the.. . area require dev lop'ers, and .contractors. -to, pr'ocute' written permission , which is held in . municipal files , if c•onst•ruct.ion activities will enc oach on private:'property , as a' condition •. of the municipal permits under • which .the work is i perf ormed . Those municipalities by uch procedure' ev.1d•ence . -.a policy .. .of • careful protection of p r i .ate property ,;,:.r i ght.s . • • Does Renton have;such "a policy? Will . it e enforced in this ' instance? .. Hy l i e nts do' not oppose. the. Honey Creek Project ,,• but do object to this inadequate, access to; it t•hrough.,thei r neighborhood . They determineda that their. ' private i."properties • wi 11 not be atilized to . anyy eictent to ' assist the 'project' :certainly their right . . By this' •.letter., they merely ;. request : their city: go' ernment ' s •• support . and ••protect i.on ,:•, .•• Thank, you for your consideration..• •+ " Very truly yo ,:: HA IS .& aL N Michael .H . Hen i:s : •. mmh , i mw cd . Hiramatsus . •. , • ; Cormans ' Hurrays . Coopmans Skip Johnson', . Developer Bob Tomberg , Developer _ City Council • ( certified .Mail. ). • Al161.70 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 5 0 6 4 0 Kathleen Hoover being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition XX , ROnton Edition X X Auburn Edition X X , ( and not in supplement Orm) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Public Notice Ordinance No . 4277) 4288 was published on July 6 , 1990 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$119 . 70 Subscribed Etnd sworn before me this 18 t h. day of July 19 90 No Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 11,1 unuuvnrvuc u %Ai),v Washington, approving a preliminary planned unit development(Honey Creek slates PP0OO15-84) t-IEREJS,a petition for the approval of eliminary planned unit development for irtain tract of land.as-hereinaffer.more- particularly described,located within the City of Renton,has heretofore been filed with the Planning Division;and • WHEREAS,a preliminary planned unit development has previously been approved for this development but has undergone a major modification in the areas of access and building locations;and WHEREAS,public hearing were held by the City Council on June 4,190,and June 18,1990,as provided by law on the amend- ed application;and WHEREAS,the applicant for this prelim- inary planned unit development has volun- tarily agreed to the time limits for submittal of the final plan for the planned unit devel- opment pursuant to section 4-15-11.F.1 of the City Code. NOW,THEREFORE,THE CITY COUN- CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,WASH- INOTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I.The preliminary planned unit development,as amended,pertaining to the following described properly is approved: See Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E.and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow.) SECTION II.The land.uses of the the preliminary planned unit development are low density single-family residential dwell- ings(R-1)and low to medium density mul- ti-family residential dwellings(R-2)which will result in a maximum o1 72 units within this planned unit development. r SECTION III.The effective date of the• preliminary planned''unit'development„ approval Is the effective.date'ol this ordfp nance,being thirty:days alter,publicationlllr The date of expiration of the appeal shall be pursuant to Section 4-15-11.F.1 which will be two years from the date of approval, subject to a one year extension if requested from and approved by the hearing examin- er.SECTION IV.'This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage,approval,and thirty.days after Its publication. . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of July,;1990. Marilyn M.'Petersen,City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of July,1990. Earl Clymer,Mayor ' Approved as to form: Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney EXHIBIT"A" Parcel A: That portion of the east half of the north- west'quarter of Section 4,Township 23 North,Range 5 East,Willamette Meridian, In King County,Washington,described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said subdivision;thence north 88 degrees 19 minutes 25 seconds west along the south line of said subdivision 445 feet;thence : north 11 degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 181.55 feet;thence north 81 degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 98.20 feet;thence north 0 degrees 51 minutes 31 seconds east 232.97 feet;thence north 32 degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 499.09 feel; thence north 89 degrees 8 minutes 29 sec' onds west 169.83 feet; thence north 9' degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 104.29 feet;thence north'45 degrees 38 minutes• 29 seconds west 343.30 feet to a point on the west line•of said subdivision,being south 0 degrees 51 minutes 31 seconds west 47.27 feet from the northwest corner of• the southeast quarter of the northwest quar- ter of said section 4;thence east 185.43 feet;thence north to the southwesterly mar- gin of southeast 97th street;thence south-. easterly along sald.margin.through a curve concave td the,rgalhwesi to'e"point of Inter-- l'section,edincidenl'wIth thee-northeasterly margin of 120th place southeast;thence northwesterly along said margin to a point of intersection with the southerly extension of the west line of the plat of Paradise Estates, according to the plat thereof recorded in volume 95.01 plats,page in King County,Washington; thence north. along said southerly extension to the soutlr.;i twest. armer of said plat.thence south 88,1 8bgrees 15 minutes 36 seconds'east along, the south line of said plat 555.64 feot;,I thence south 1 degree 16 minutes 0 sec- onds.west 392.7 eel;thence south 88 degrees 17 minutes 0 seconds east 555.64.( feet to the east line of said subdivision;"", thence south 1 degree 16 minutes 0 sec-'„ onds west along said east line 1,513.75 feet-- to the true point of beginning;.. Also known as Lot A of King County Lot Line Adjustment Number 585109). PARCEL B; - _. That portion of the southeast quarter of the,, j,northwest quarter of Section 4 Township 23 North,Range 5 East,Willamette Meridian,r. in King County,Washington,described as : follows:. Commecing at then southeastnorth 88 degrees' saidminutes' subdivision; 19 minutes'25 seconds west along the south line of said subd'iision 445 feet to the true point of beginning;thence north 11- degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 181.55, e''teet;thence north 81 degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 98.20 feet;thence north.0.+ degrees 51 minutes 31 seconds east 232.97 feet;thence north 32 degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 499.09 feet;thence north 89 degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 169.83 feet;thence.north 9 degrees 8 minutes 29 seconds west 104.29 feel;thence north 45 degree^ '+8 minutes 29 seconds west• 343.30 teat to a point on the west line of said subdivision,being south 0 degrees51minutes31secondswest47.27 feet from the northwest corner of said subdivision;, e,,,m.5r minutes 31 sec,.. CITN JF RENTON LL Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor July 5, 1990 S. T. Schreiner Accounting Division Manager King County Assessor 709A King County Administration Building Seattle, WA 98104-2384 RE: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4277 Honey Creek PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Schreiner: Enclosed please find a copy of the above-referenced ordinance approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development for Honey Creek Associates. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, d--) • 041.-& -es‘- Marilyn J!':401 en, CMC City Clerk MJP:r j s cc: Don Erickson, Current Planning Larry Springer, Long-Range Planning City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor July 5, 1990 Henry Jacobson 13701 SE Allen Road Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4277 Honey Creek PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Jacobson: Enclosed please find a copy of the above-referenced ordinance approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development for Honey Creek Associates. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Marilyn J. P rsen, CMC City Clerk MJP:rjs cc: Don Erickson, Current Planning Larry Springer, Long-Range Planning City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 y ` CITY OF RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor July 5, 1990 Bob Tomberg 5611 119th SE, #2 Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4277 Honey Creek PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Tomberg: Enclosed please find a copy of the above-referenced ordinance approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development for Honey Creek Associates. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Marilyn . rsen, CMC City Clerk MJP:rjs cc: Don Erickson, Current Planning Larry Springer, Long-Range Planning City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 c! :- tj CITY OF RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor July 5, 1990 Randall Corman 2216 Harrington P1 NE Renton, WA 98056 RE: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4277 Honey Creek PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Corman: Enclosed please find a copy of the above-referenced ordinance approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development for Honey Creek Associates. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Marilyn en, CMC City Clerk MJP:rjs cc: Don Erickson, Current Planning Larry Springer, Long-Range Planning City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 5:CITY JF RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor July 5, 1990 Mitch Murray 2318 NE 23rd Place Renton, WA 98056 RE: City of Renton Ordinance No. 4277 Honey Creek PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Murray: Enclosed please find a copy of the above-referenced ordinance approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development for Honey Creek Associates. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Marilyn 1 r rsen, CMC City Clerk MJP:rjs cc: Don Erickson, Current Planning Larry Springer, Long-Range Planning City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 y uc1 — otS'8ti July Zen/on City Council Minutes Pane 203 MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER THIS MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Annexation: North Soos Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler said she has received some draft fact cards Creek (Fairwood) for the North Soos Creek annexation study and asked what method has been established for receiving comment. Public Works Director Lynn Guttmann requested that comments be sent to her for response. Parks: Trees on Sunset Councilman Stredicke expressed his appreciation for the detailed report Boulevard forwarded to him by Acting Parks Director Sam Chastain in answer to his query at the June 25, 1990, Council meeting regarding the condition of the trees planted by the City on NE Sunset Boulevard . Planning: Noise Level Councilman Stredicke stated that he received a letter requesting direction Ordinance from Council from Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes regarding the noise ordinance he proposed at the July 11, 1990, Council meeting. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 6, 1990, TO CONSIDER POSSIBLE LEGISLATION REGARDING NOISE FROM MOVING VEHICLES IN THE CITY OF RENTON. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN. COUNCIL INSTRUCT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE INCLUDE A DEFINITION OF AUDIBLE NOISE AT A DISTANCE OF TO 75 FEET FROM THE SOURCE. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL SET THE LEVEL OF THE FINE FOR VIOLATION AT $200.00. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION AND SET THE AMOUNT OF THE FINE TO $250.00, THE SAME FINE AS SET FOR UNMUFFLED COMPRESSION BRAKES. CARRIED. ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Council requested that the ordinance be reasonably consistent with other legislation of this nature in surrounding communities; noted that the draft ordinance will be a basis for discussion at the public hearing; expressed concern regarding enforcement of a noise ordinance; and suggested that staff investigate ways to enforce such an ordinance. It was also noted that the City of San Antonio has a noise measuring device that it uses to enforce such legislation and suggested that staff contact that city for enforcement information. CAG: 90-045, Mosquito Councilman Edwards suggested that Council send a letter to the State to show Abatement Program support of Mayor Clymer in his efforts in regard to the Mosquito Abatement Program. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY TANNER, A LETTER SIGNED BY THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT BE SENT TO THE DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY TO EXPEDITE THE MOSQUITO SPRAY PERMIT IN THE RENTON VALLEY AREA. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4276 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of S.W. 31st Street (Glacier Park Vacation: VAC-89-004,Company, VAC-004-89). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED SW 31st Street, Glacier BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL Park Company CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED Ordinance #4277 I An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development PUD: Preliminary,located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and Honey Creek. PPUD- generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow (Honey Creek Associates, 015-84 PPUD-015-84). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: FIVE AYES: MATHEWS, NELSON, TANNER KEOLKER- WHEELER, EDWARDS. TWO NAYS: ZIMMERMAN, STREDICKE. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTE] COMMITTEE REPORT July 2, 1990 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Vacation of Portion of SW 31st Street, Glacier Park Company, VAC-004-89 Honey Creek Associates PPUD ECF-033-90 - 2200 block of Jefferson Ave. NE and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow James E. Bakke Rezone (R-017-88) of 3 lots from G-1 to B-1 and 1 lot from G-1 to R-3 for future 111 unit multi-family residential complex south of NE 4th & 300 ft. east of Union NE The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Authorizing the Administration to Apply for Funding Assistance from the IAC for Outdoor Recreation Projects fi u r 6d Kathy Keol r-Wheeler, Chair Z4 Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair Richard tredicke, Member a CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4277 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PPUD-015-84) WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a preliminary planned unit development for a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has heretofore been filed with the Planning Division; and WHEREAS, a preliminary planned unit development has previously been approved for this development but has undergone a major modification in the areas of access and building locations; and WHEREAS, public hearing were held by the City Council on June 4, 1990 , and June 18, 1990, as provided by law on the amended application; and WHEREAS, the applicant for this preliminary planned unit development has voluntarily agreed to the time limits for submittal of the final plan for the planned unit development pursuant to section 4-15-11 .F. 1 of the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I . The preliminary planned unit development, as amended, pertaining to the following described property is approved: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E . and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow. ) 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4277 SECTION II .The land uses of the preliminary planned unit development are low density single-family residential dwellings (R- 1 ) and low to medium density multi-family residential dwellings (R- 2 ) which will result in a maximum of 72 units within this planned unit development . SECTION III . The effective date of the preliminary planned unit development approval is the effective date of this ordinance, being thirty days after publication. The date of expiration of the appeal shall be pursuant to Section 4-15-11 .F. 1 which will be two years from the date of approval , subject to a one year extension if requested from and approved by the hearing examiner . SECTION IV.This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of July 1990 . 71- i) Marilyn 44t9tersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of July 1990 . Earl Clymer, Maybr Approv as to form: Lawrence J. War en, City Attorney Date of Publication: July 6, 1990 Ord. 145 : 6-6-90 :as . 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4277 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 445 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 181.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 98.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 232.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 32 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 499.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 169.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 9 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 104.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 343.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, BEING SOUTH 0 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST 47.27 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE EAST 185.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SOUTHEAST 97TH STREET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN THROUGH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION COINCIDENT WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 120TH PLACE SOUTHEAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE PLAT OF PARADISE ESTATES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 95 OF PLATS, PAGE 93, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 36 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PLAT 555.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 16 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 392.7 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 555.64 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 1 DEGREE 16 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 1,513.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO KNOWN AS LOT A OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 585109). PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 445 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 181.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 98.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 232.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 32 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 499.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 169.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 9 DEGREES 8 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 104.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST 343.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, BEING SOUTH 0 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST 47.27 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 1169.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 25 SECONDS 843.90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO KNOW AS LOT B OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 585109.) ORDINANCE NO. 4277 0 CHIC.',G T ITT E INSUR?: NC7 COMPANY 1800 COLUMB C=N i ER, 701 Firri H AVE.. 5EA,i LE, Y. 98 1G•s 1=C31 625-56,- t'w ., r..TT:..art , t..t.. “ if.. i' I. 4111(11.111.1111.31:ii w \ J ' I„:, ,:: •\ 4: Tc.i.,i5- I\ : , r t1K + T... I I t 1,1 i f fe '' a' J r+ i 1 , = ti 1 w C I it I t i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON CITY COUNCIL RECORD OF DECISION APPLICANT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES/ SKIP JACOBSON FILE NO.: PPUD-15-84 Vicinity of the 2200 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST:Approval of a revised preliminary PUD application for a multiple-family development with 72 dwelling units on 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek. The following report incorporates the Findings and Conclusions of the original report of the Hearing Examiner issued on March 4, 1985,which was later revised in the Hearing Examiner's report of January 17, 1986. Changes in some of the findings reflect the modified site plan for the P.U.D. FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Skip Jacobson, requests approval of a revision to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development (P.P.U.D) application for the Honey Creek P.U.D. The Honey Creek P.U.D. proposal consists of 72 dwelling units on approximately 14.06 acres of property. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, the previous decisions by the Hearing Examiner, and a revised site plan together with a remand and other pertinent documentation are a part of the record for the application. In addition, documentation includes decisions regarding on-site access. 3. The City Council, on April 14, 1986, adopted the recommendations of the Planning and Development Committee, approving the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner, as amended, to rezone the PUD site subject to: 1) submission of a final PUD; 2) annexation of the site into the City; 3) dedication of a full 40-foot right-of-way on N.E. 23rd; 4) submission with a final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis; 5) submission of detailed plans for the final PUD showing usable open space, recreation and building details; 6) provision of a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the subject site or portions of it were sold; 7) submission of a detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc.; 8) elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st Street; 9) the property zoned R-1 shall have no development pending the City being provided detailed geotechnical information regarding site and site plan or PUD approval; and, 10) acknowledgement that current plans are for conceptual approval of a PPUD and do not vest in the applicant or assign any development rights on the subject parcel or property without recommendations of City staff and approval by Council of the geotechnical studies called for above. 4. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's Responsible Official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance on October 21, 1985. The Committee reviewed the revised request on October 16, 1985 and determined that the original determination is valid for the proposed revisions to the P.U.D. site plan. 5. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter on or between April 24, 1984 and October 10, 1985 and in succeeding years as needed to resolve issues. 6. The subject site is located in the vicinity of 2200 Jefferson Avenue N.E., immediately south and generally east of 120th Place S.E., more commonly known as Devil's Elbow. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4095, enacted on November 25, 1987. 8. The subject site is a portion of a 47.7 acre site rezoned by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4141, enacted on March 24, 1988. The subject parcel received an R-2, Residential zoning classification which is a low density multiple-family zone allowing 12.1 dwelling units per acre. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as being suitable for the development of greenbelt and low density multiple-family uses, but does not allow such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The configuration of the existing site was created through a lot line adjustment in King County approved in 1986. 11. A steep ravine is located adjacent to the property line running diagonally from the northernmost point of the property to the southeast corner of the site. Honey Creek is located at the bottom of this steep ravine. 12. Access to the subject site is limited due to the complex topography of the subject parcel and adjacent parcel to the northeast and east, and given the existing development pattern in the general area. Development surrounding the subject site is mixed. To the north and immediately north/northeast and east are undeveloped parcels of property which includes the majority of the ravine area and Honey Creek. To the east are single-family uses, generally clustered in single- family subdivisions. The property south of the site is developed with senior housing and duplex housing complexes developed during World War II. Finally, to the west, development consists of single-family residences. 13. The site, at one time, was part of an old quarry. The relatively level plateau, on which the development is proposed, is the result of the quarry activity. An old road grade was cut into the site from Devil's Elbow to approximately the area of the subject site. 14. Sewer service will be available to the site via hookup to the Honey Creek interceptor sewer which runs through the bottom of the adjacent ravine. 15. Storm drainage from the site will flow into Honey Creek, a fish spawning stream. Because of this, biofiltration of surface water runoff should occur before storm drainage discharges into this stream. 16. Water lines will need to be extended from Harrington Avenue N.E. to serve the site. 17. Considerable discussion has taken place over the years on the issue of access to the site. The public opposition to the development has focussed mostly upon site access, the inadequacy of the adjacent roads, and the impacts of traffic at these access points upon the adjacent single-family neighborhood. Both N.E. 21st Street and N.E. 23rd Street were found to be substandard streets, for example. The now proposed access road off of Jefferson Avenue N.E. will have grades of 10% to 15%. Devil's Elbow was dropped from consideration because of its grades as well as the fact that it had experienced continued instability. The Public Works Department has determined that Devil's Elbow is"not safe for either primary access or emergency access." 1E. In March 1985, the original PPUD application for this site was denied by the Hearing Examiner based upon inaccurate density calculations. At that time, primary access was from Jefferson Avenue N.E., with a second access on N.E. 21st Street. A 20-foot wide, gated emergency access road was provided along N.E. 23rd Street. Following resubmittal in January 1986, the Hearing Examiner recommended the elimination of the second access on N.E. 21st Street and also required that the applicant bear the cost of upgrading these access roads. 1 1 With the elimination of the N.E. 21st Street access and the shifting of access to the south, the Council required, at its meeting on April 14, 1986, the "...dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of- way alignment with N.E. 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue N.E. and the site, with an engineering report and specifications for full street improvement as required by City Code." Because of subsequent difficulties in acquiring the necessary right-of-way, the applicants, Honey Creek Associates, asked the City in September, 1986 to assist them by starting condemnation proceedings (at the owners expense) against the owners of the adjacent properties. 0. On April 4, 1988, Council approved Honey Creek PPUD (PPUD-015-84) which became effective May 9, 1988 (Ordinance No. 4143). 21. In June of 1988, neighbors near the site supported the proposed Honey Creek PUD development as an improvement that would "discourage crime, dumping, and motorcycle access in the area." 22. After the City began condemnation proceedings, this matter was later appealed to the courts by one of the property owners whose property was being condemned. A Superior Court decision issued on April 25, 1988 barred the City from using eminent domain to acquire a full right-of-way on N.E. 23rd Street (it was felt that the City was using its powers to primarily benefit a private applicant). 23. At another public hearing on the PPUD on June 19, 1989, the Council was asked to decide whether to retain the approved PPUD requirement of two full access roads to the site or to reduce the requirement to one access road along N.E. Jefferson with a twenty foot, gated emergency access road on N.E. 23rd Street. The Council decided not to take action on this date. 24. At a subsequent meeting on July 24, 1989, the Council, in response to a request from the applicant, passed a motion to amend the PPUD to eliminate its earlier requirement that the applicant provide full street improvements including a 40-foot wide public right-of-way alignment along N.E. 23rd Street. Instead, Council called for the road to be improved only for emergency vehicle access using the twenty (20) feet of right-of-way that the City owns on N.E. 23rd Street. That motion also asked the Public Works Department to review the adequacy of streets serving the 2- southern exit from the site as well as look at safety issues on these streets and report back to Council. Staff determined that these streets were designed for local access as defined in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The size, construction and maintenance plans for these streets also indicates local access status. Neighborhood collectors per the Subdivision Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan are to be 60 feet- paved for 36 feet. 25. The traffic analysis prepared for the subject proposal predicted 60% of the PPUD development's traffic will travel south from the project site toward Kirkland Avenue N.E. The remainder of the traffic from this area of the site would travel north and west of the site. 26. Under the previous (1985) site plan, which had its primary access from N.E. 21st Street as well as Jefferson, residents along these streets were concerned that ingress and egress and subsequent improvements along these streets would open up an even more direct route through a residential neighborhood. This concern has been reduced under the latest site plan (drawing dated 1-24-90, see Exhibit "A") which limits primary access to Jefferson Avenue N.E. Traffic leaving the development heading north under the revised proposal would now have to exit via Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. Traffic traveling southward would likely travel the same route, but continue south on Edmonds Avenue N.E. 27. In June of 1989, Public Works evaluated whether N.E. 21st should be evaluated as an alternative to N.E. 23rd Street. They concluded there was: 1) insufficient right-of-way; and 2) traffic will pass through a single-family residential area. 28. On September 13, 1989, the Public Works Department reported back to the Council on improvements it felt were necessary to ensure pedestrian safety due to increased traffic generated by the subject proposal on September 25, 1989. This report was subsequently referred back to the Planning and Development Committee for their consideration. 29 The Planning and Development Committee held several meetings to study this matter. On December 11, 1989, the Planning and Development Committee recommended, and the Council approved, the following street improvement conditions: a.The developer will improve the road on its project to city standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. It is anticipated that the road will be dedicated to the city. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of the street. b.The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E., as follows: 1.Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. 2.Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E. which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. c.The developer will install the following school safety improvements: 1.A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E. with appropriate signing should be required. 2.Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E., south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. 30. Pursuant to this action, the applicant has proposed to use N.E. 23rd street as a gated emergency access. Although the City owns 20 feet of right-of-way on the extension of N.E. 23rd Street, not all of this can be used for improved roadway since a retaining wall has to be built along a portion of it. The Fire Department, on March 21, 1990, indicated that there is sufficient right-of-way to build the emergency access provided that the width of the paved portion of the right-of-way is not less than 18 feet wide. The applicants submitted revised plans on March 7, 1990 showing that this requirement could be met. Further, the applicant retained Terra Associates, Inc. to evaluate the adequacy of the proposed concrete retaining walls on either side of the roadway. The engineers determined that the design shown for the roadway improvements could be accomplished. 31. Density calculations which were based upon the PUD formula were originally a subject of dispute. With the revised PPUD plans, this issue is essentially resolved. The only potential area for dispute in the current case might be over the choice of contour intervals used in calculating steep slopes and the subsequent densities allowed. The Building and Zoning Department (now part of the 3- Community Development Department) had primary jurisdiction for determining the density. It appears the Department made a reasonable determination of the density in 1985. In addition, its decision was not disputed at the time. 32. The total number of units, barring slope, street and dedication deductions which could be accommodated on those portions of the site for which the applicant has requested R1 zoning would be 48.36, while 72 units could be accommodated on that portion of the site zoned R2, for a total of 120.36 units on the original 14.06 acre portion of the site currently under consideration. Dedications would reduce the acreage by approximately 0.85 acres or 5.1 units, and street set asides would reduce the acreage by 1.6 acres or 9.6 units. The slope formula used by the City staff, deducting the most acreage due to severe slope, would reduce the development potential by 31.9% or 33.71 units. The total would permit 71.95 units which was just .05 units below the applicant's request of 72 units. 33. The potential 72 units are planned only for that portion of the site lying to the south and west of Honey Creek. 34. No population projections or school age student projections were made for the subject proposal by staff in 1985. Using current standards, we would estimate that the 72 units of multi-family townhouses and flats would generate approximately 29 school age children. This compares to an estimated 26 school age children if the site were developed with an estimated 43 single-family homes. 35 The project, with its 72 units, would generate an estimated 430 vehicle trips per day. Comparisons were drawn indicating that the development of approximately 43 single-family homes (under single-family zoning on this site) would generate, at 10.0 AWDTE per dwelling unit a similar amount of traffic as 72 units at 6.5 AWDTE per dwelling unit (468 vehicle trips per day). 3E. The majority of soils found on the site are sandy soils of Class III. Such soils typically imply that such a site would be susceptible to erosion, earthquake and landslide damage. Slides occurred while the sewer line was being installed in the creek bed, and other slides and sloughs have occurred in the past along the steep walls above Honey Creek, both on and off the subject site. The applicant has addressed this by restricting their development to those portions of the site having a mean average slope of less than 10 percent. In addition, the use of native vegetation buffers on steep slopes should be provided to further reduce the likelihood of slides. CONCLUSIONS 1. The development of the subject site using the PUD provisions of the Building Regulations would appear to be in the public interest. The unique topography and environment of the subject site can best be protected by clustering new development on those portions of the site that are less prone to erosion or landslide damage and staying away from areas having steeper slopes such as along Honey Creek. The 1982 PUD provisions allow such density clustering when it is in the public interest. The proposed 72 multi-family units would not produce substantially more traffic than a 43 unit single-family residential development (permitted under the current zoning). The PUD appears to present a reasonable method of developing an environmentally sensitive site, permits the applicant reasonable use of the site (which is private property) and appears to protect the site's fragile environment better than most other uses except possibly a park or open space use. The latter, however, would do little to police the site and reduce unauthorized use of the site by those dumping litter, shooting off firecrackers, and driving motorcycles across it. 2. The topographical isolation of the site would also appear sufficient to avoid any adverse impacts from incompatible housing types or densities on adjoining properties. Whereas under the 1985 site plan, buildings in the southwest corner of the site were within 90 feet of the western and southern property lines. Under the latest 1990 site plan, there is at least a 190 foot separation from the nearest residential building to the southern or western property lines. The housing under this latest site plan would be clustered and encircle the level westerly plateau, which would be left for open space purposes. 3. Multi-family dwelling units at this location would allow for more variety and diversity in the existing neighborhood and allow more housing choices for those who wish to reside in this part of the City, be they existing or new residents. At this stage, the applicant has not provided a definitive plan for the different multi-family housing types being proposed. Only a schematic proposal, as is required for Preliminary PUDs, has been submitted at this time. A breakdown as to unit size, type and number of bedrooms should be provided for all units and buildings in the PUD. 4. The issue of slope stability has not yet been adequately addressed. While the site seems suitable from a land use perspective for a PUD of 72 units, the geological underpinnings of the site need to be more fully explored. With the submission of the Final PUD, the applicant will have to present a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Department of Community Development and the Public Works Departments. The report 4- shall include, but not be limited to, information regarding: site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their current state; long term implications of development on slope stability; geologic hazard including earthquake analysis; plans for site preparation and restoration, as well as building construction techniques that will minimize ground instability and/or subsidence due to settling or erosion. The applicant should be required to provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is ever sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowners/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. 5. The access concerns of residents remain even with the scaling down of the proposal from 120 units to 72 units. It is not just the increased population of the subject proposal, but the creation of a new defacto "through" street - connection along Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. to N.E. 16th Street which raises concerns about safety to nearby residents and school age children. The streets surrounding the subject site to the south were not designed as collector streets, and in their current state should not be utilized as such. Even with the upgrading of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. with street improvements, and surface upgrading, the proposed access to the site may pose some problems to nearby residents since homes along these streets are located closer to the street than would normally be the case along collector streets. 6 The applicant's latest proposal, using Jefferson Avenue N.E. for primary access and N.E. 23rd Street as a gated emergency approach to the site, makes sense now that the City's Fire Marshal has agreed to accept a roadway width of less than 20 feet on N.E. 23rd Street. Many other complexes, such as Cedar Ridge and Woodcliffe, have one primary entry with an emergency access which is gated, and some, such as Forest Brook, only have one entry point. With the elimination of secondary access and the changing of N.E. 23rd Street into emergency access only, there no longer is a need to keep the previously proposed secondary access along N.E. 21st Street. 7. The site plan for the Preliminary PUD now appears reasonable and should be approved. (NOTE: Plans for the Final PUD would have to follow the layout shown in the Preliminary PUD but also be more detailed and show the requisite open space, recreation areas, and building design details.) DECISION: B;_ised upon the above analysis, the Council hereby approves the preliminary P.U.D., File PPUD-015-84, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a detailed geotechnical report with the submission of the final PUD application. The report shall address site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their existing state; analyze the long term erosion potential by the development; identify geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; provide specifics on site preparation and restoration; and identify appropriate building techniques for the site. 2. The applicant shall construct and maintain gated secondary emergency access along the right-of- way of N.E. 23rd Street which shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall and Public Works Director, with a minimum width of 18 feet of paving. 3. The applicant shall provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. In addition, the applicant shall record covenants running with the land requiring that the slope on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as closely as is possible in its natural state. 4. The applicant shall improve the road on its project to City standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. The roadway shall be dedicated to the City. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of the street. 5. The applicant shall improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E., as follows: 1.Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. 2.Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E. which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. 5- 6. The applicant shall install the following school safety improvements: a.A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E., with appropriate signing, should be required. b.Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E., south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. 7. The submittal of detailed plans for the final PUD, providing a description of the usable open space, recreation and building details. 8. The final PUD shall comply with relevant City PUD review criteria (contained in Section 4-15-5 and 4-15-10 of the City Code) as they pertain to: separation of pedestrian and vehicular circulation; privacy within and between units; preservation of views and natural features; siting of carports and/or garages; treatment of exterior building surfaces for aesthetic and durability reasons; lighting; signage; and landscaping. 9. The applicant shall comply with all existing and any subsequent mitigation conditions imposed by the City's responsible SEPA official, the Environmental Review Committee. 10 The applicant shall submit a detailed tree inventory and landscaping and on-site improvements plan acceptable to the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 11. The applicant shall submit plans and bonds for all on and off site improvements stipulated by the Public Works Department, including those improvements identified in their memo of September 13, 1990 to the Council. 12. The applicant shall submit a detailed construction impact mitigation plan acceptable to the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 13. The applicant shall work with Community Development and Parks and Recreation Department staff to develop appropriate on-site recreation facilities for future residents prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 14. The final PUD shall comply with the time limits for PUDs as set forth in Section 4-15-11.F. of the City Code. 6- rK.., '" -1 June 25. 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 195 For the record, Councilman Zimmerman stated she opposed the Council taking action on this subject at its June 18, 1990, meeting since the two Council members that had concerns on this issue were absent. Motion failed. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, THAT COUNCIL CONCLUDE THAT VISION 2020 NEEDS FURTHER DISCUSSION AND RECOMMEND THAT COUNCIL MEMBERS ATTEND THE WORKSHOP ON JULY 11, 1990, IN BELLEVUE. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented a report Committee stating that the Committee met on Tuesday, June 19, 1990, to review the Board/Commission: Park scope of authority given to the Park Board by Ordinance No. 1476 (1954). Board Authority The Committee voted to leave the existing ordinance in place as written, since all rules and regulations must be approved by the City Council either by resolution or by ordinance. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilman Mathews requested clarification of the current policy of the Park Board. Acting Parks Director Chastain explained that the Park Board submits all such changes to the City Council for approval. *MOTION CARRIED. Board/Commission: Councilman Zimmerman reported that she had a letter from the Planning Planning Commission, Commission, dated April 19, 1990, discussing annexation goals and policies Annexation Hearings and the scheduling of public hearings for draft annexation policies. She asked if dates had been set for those public hearings. Planning Manager Springer reported that the Commission is working on a revised schedule and the Council will be notified when these hearings have been set. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Edwards presented the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4275 An ordinance was read annexing certain territory of the City (Duncan Annexation: Duncan Annexation; A-001-89 - approximately 42.54 acres, bounded by Jones and Lincoln Avenues NE, NE 43rd Street, 112th Avenue SE, and NE 36th Street). In response to Councilman Stredicke's request for clarification regarding the concurrent rezone and annexation, Planning Manager Springer explained that it is the City's policy to annex property concurrently to low intensity single family zoning (R-1). If a zoning change to a higher density is desired, the parties must then go through the hearing examiner process. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: FIVE AYES: MATHEWS, EDWARDS, TANNER, ZIMMERMAN, NELSON; ONE NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke explained that his "no" vote was due to his opinion that fire protection is inadequate in the area of the Duncan annexation. Councilman Edwards requested the administration to investigate annexation of apartment complex north of the Duncan annexation area since it fronts on city streets and uses city water. Councilman Mathews encouraged the administration to discuss improved fire service with Fire District #25. Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Edwards presented the following ordinances for first reading: Vacation: VAC-89-004,An ordinance was read vacating a portion of S.W. 31st Street (Glacier Park SW 31st Street, Glacier Company, VAC-004-89). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY Park Company MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. PUD: Preliminary,An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development Honey Creek, PPUD-, located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and 015-84 generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow (Honey Creek Associates PPUD-015-84). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED June 25. 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 195 For the record, Councilman Zimmerman stated she opposed the Council taking action on this subject at its June 18, 1990, meeting since the two Council members that had concerns on this issue were absent. Motion failed. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, THAT COUNCIL CONCLUDE THAT VISION 2020 NEEDS FURTHER DISCUSSION AND RECOMMEND THAT COUNCIL MEMBERS ATTEND THE WORKSHOP ON JULY 11, 1990, IN BELLEVUE. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented a report Committee stating that the Committee met on Tuesday, June 19, 1990, to review the Board/Commission: Park scope of authority given to the Park Board by Ordinance No. 1476 (1954). Board Authority The Committee voted to leave the existing ordinance in place as written, since all rules and regulations must be approved by the City Council either by resolution or by ordinance. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilman Mathews requested clarification of the current policy of the Park Board. Acting Parks Director Chastain explained that the Park Board submits all such changes to the City Council for approval. *MOTION CARRIED. Board/Commission: Councilman Zimmerman reported that she had a letter from the Planning Planning Commission, Commission, dated April 19, 1990, discussing annexation goals and policies Annexation Hearings and the scheduling of public hearings for draft annexation policies. She asked if dates had been set for those public hearings. Planning Manager Springer reported that the Commission is working on a revised schedule and the Council will be notified when these hearings have been set. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Edwards presented the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4275 An ordinance was read annexing certain territory of the City (Duncan Annexation: Duncan Annexation; A-001-89 - approximately 42.54 acres, bounded by Jones and Lincoln Avenues NE, NE 43rd Street, 112th Avenue SE, and NE 36th Street). In response to Councilman Stredicke's request for clarification regarding the concurrent rezone and annexation, Planning Manager Springer explained that it is the City's policy to annex property concurrently to low intensity single family zoning (R-1). If a zoning change to a higher density is desired, the parties must then go through the hearing examiner process. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: FIVE AYES: MATHEWS, EDWARDS, TANNER, ZIMMERMAN, NELSON; ONE NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke explained that his "no" vote was due to his opinion that fire protection is inadequate in the area of the Duncan annexation. Councilman Edwards requested the administration to investigate annexation of apartment complex north of the Duncan annexation area since it fronts on city streets and uses city water. Councilman Mathews encouraged the administration to discuss improved fire service with Fire District #25. Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Edwards presented the following ordinances for first reading: Vacation: VAC-89-004,An ordinance was read vacating a portion of S.W. 31st Street (Glacier Park SW 31st Street, Glacier Company, VAC-004-89). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY Park Company MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. PUD: Preliminary,An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development Honey Creek, PPUD- located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and 015-84 generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow (Honey Creek Associates PPUD-015-84). MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT June 25, 1990 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Duncan Annexation, A-001-89 - approximately 42.54 acres, bounded by Jones and Lincoln Avenues N.E., N.E. 43rd Street, 112th Avenue S.E. and N.E. 36th Street The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Vacation of Portion of SW 31st Street, Glacier Park Company, VAC-004-89 Honey Creek Associates PPUD-033-90 - 2200 block of Jefferson Ave. NE and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow James E. Bakke Rezone (R-017-88) of 3 lots from G-1 to B-1 and 1 lot from G-l to R-3 for future 111 unit multi-family residential complex south of NE 4th & 300 ft. east of Union NE The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Authorization of interlocal agreement with City of Seattle for law enforcement assistance during 1990 Goodwill Games OAKESDALE AVENUE SW STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM SW GRADY WAY TO SW 16th STREET (Referred 6/18.90) The Ways and Means Committee recommends acceptance of the project and final pay estimate in the amount of $994.52 and retainage in the amount of $116,850.65 to be released after thirty days subject to the required authorization. The Committee further recommends that $30,000 be reserved for potential settlement of claims. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval for payment claims checks #70811 through 71211 and six wire transfers, totaling $890,502.37; and payroll vouchers #88405 through 88881, and 218 direct deposits, in the amount of $781,137.78. 02Ih Bob Edwards, Vice-Chair Ali 577zegd2- Richard Stredicke, Member 110-41 Nancy Mat ws, Acting Member SUN 4 1990 1' E)G irm,Ci OCCIC1.TED R.OW U ' L !) Y OtM. Rom. JCrr'CMd,I EXTEr.rro,.rr 010114 e.,.....,,N4 2 r 71 SECTION C-C A I CLGu zr. ‘, M YII(...1=.. ..: Alli., t r. , lr'i. EN OW e.. -. ,tAv 1. Y , `, w..,.Nw aww,.,O,/ iO.c. i rxe,IE rn e prove asl-E PROPERTY CRAMP. it; r4 e re 1ra.AT.SECTION D-D I U.. II' i v. Ira '1 i I z f =ELEV, 3Ws 1 I II _ •R\\., ^' Ti_ s_,v z r. PPOPEJC^I C•-"ERLier,CY vie ACCEV. I d: I 5' 3.o. tAL•',I I'' I,•IIII I, wa.atia a 4-atiG 4 ern ra n i u-III. • II1.III nT`r SECTIONE-E d LANE 1 • I 4 IS v t = T SITE CROSS SECTIONS I Z',b. ES 1,_46-d o-uz.•x.•.,.a r-.d_d JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants CT( xx.... 1r I` i fIVI fr ton.italx wn.W.f r... ....••.•r..Nex.0.w.. w r e E `= 7_ $ r ott' eW fo O r w. w Me cost.. rr •-/wrnwlxf•'1.` n i..rn..f us.fon f h a .... faslow W'.f.' M.e.Or MI.,p` ..etono r--E-- ney..v. a..n.r un.e f.N:.w.a.M...a L`1' I l• • ofM.i.. a: n acorn•w.. ..f w.a:a ill t "1. _ n•xf•m.i .0 . U .•x.•rN nf.n f...:0.<.x ' 6.-6. --_, pew...potter of owt•wee".wod no now room or smarm. I ' o!•f:•=.•n..xx. ax f...:wr.. fi..n..•n•n•m.n.xe f.n:. wVICINITYMAPLEGALDESCRIPTIONA _40, I o no....o, 0.$/i.41 lie;14110-0 414*15' u.- ,.`::,.., 6 ',ice 1 ,*41 ,-,ts4, IV i.-. I•- V tiJ //,l l _ STATISTICS . ,,.... 0 ab) 11 tA f' atijoi ,1 •„I I J I 1 7,41: 0,4 41;: i_ r* i: 4 0291$51" i•• 5.f_.• "',/' . , ,, V .1 kaA"'.•-NAd: IPAffi° ' ' 44k(g•Ni 4--. - .. K.- ',it0I , ---- , ,,.4... pii ,,,;),t E..._ i, J14 -.1 i 55. iii Orki Cr 11"Millelii illic,.**A Ss.*:"- C -.- i.3 4*.. "" 4 ' f/ j/ '''' ' 2 I :- I '''' 7 104,,,,,,,, ,a 011,7=1„.... . 1,s... 1.4.,- ,•••„: 1.‘,.!: ,.... 01, ko...4414;, o%,• ( 7 oteffeo 7•1._,.51.1. li A10.4 - ,... • z .,, ia,•li''''114v44;te. L.- 4,,alliip- ...di,tr_ilaikAbk.-: ' it'/....-77----. ------- sr--------- r-si----___/ ) ‘', 4\--cli(C.-/ 1s. Z. — e - 9 -ala4,-' _ _ .! .T me 4 e / r-:- F-' ".` AYE.N.E. j is psi w==== Oil! 00 i,, r J -J KC e el SITE PLAN 1. :1.,= 7'-‘," ( y11 II 06GT-I f ' JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants J U N 4 1990 _ 2.J.00 fVENL P.M-15LYyfNN4 L. I\ 1 ExrtriNy Gp..noe w.e.Isao pi.. 1jAi . CRETE 1 1. L. 1.-Tir GLM Z1 wITH'QM is /aofA.1,M. A 7,.... M.a ILIT a i I(irGT-I-Lis X-~...ctke4-)1•i GJGnGY1Ut IG nu % al l oa.04itiohal -helot is r Lured t0 VBn-exi s{- 1cz1I A II A-A:section at n.e. 23rd street••emergency access road rccLl:Iv1'.1,-0' 1t 114" I o r.rr 1•-bO.0---urt•att0T; 0u[v•575.0 ntarefrvLIM yyrawv.,eo tL\ VIiIIIYLTnTMO1015ntlh12f13ppaNfjyq11LaI414041f44Lmacroano J LDL y_ fNCs I ti 1(1 C o aao C / c-•-- ra a11Q O 100.VG I aao aad Y j:; ICE.IIaT STRUT WC1• s oD aao aIA Jco SECTION B-B SCALE HORIZONTAL 1•-20• VERTICAL r-10' I. 10 D O 4 It, .....____ SCALI 1.ao• PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 18, 1990 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF NANCY MATHEWS, President; RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KATHY COUNCIL MEMBERS KEOLKER-WHEELER, THERESA ZIMMERMAN, TONI NELSON. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS ROBERT EDWARDS AND JESSE TANNER BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; JOHN E. WEBLEY, Acting Executive Assistant; ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk; LARRY SPRINGER, Planning Manager; CHIEF ALAN WALLIS, Police Department; RUBEN NIETO, Personnel Director; DON ERICKSON, Chief, Current Planning; CAPTAIN DON PERSSON; LIEUTENANT PETE ADAMS; SERGEANT JOHN WALTERS; LIEUTENANT BRIAN WILSON; BROOKE OWEN, Crime Prevention Coordinator, Police Department; PRISCILLA PIERCE, Data Processing Coordinator, Public Works Department. PRESS Tina Hilding, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL MINUTES COUNCIL APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 11, 1990. CARRIED. SPECIAL Mayor Clymer presented Volunteer Service Awards to Gloria Tozer and Jerry PRESENTATION Hess for completion of 500 hours of service to the Renton Police Department, Police: Volunteer Service noting great pride in the service that the volunteers provide to the City. Awards Chief Alan Wallis commended both recipients for their service to the department, and called attention to the importance volunteers play in each department. Chief Wallis reported that Gloria Tozer began her service with the department in May of 1987; and Jerry Hess in August of 1988. Police: Introduction to K- Chief Wallis introduced Griz, the newest K-9 member of the Renton Police 9 Member Department. Griz is a 14-week-old German Shepherd who will be trained to assume the duties of Toby, the current police dog, upon his retirement. Councilwoman Nelson expressed deep-felt gratitude to both Toby and police officers responsible for the apprehension of the suspects involved in burglaries of the Renton Flower Shop and Cugini's Florist. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published PUD: Preliminary, Honey in accordance with local and State law, Mayor Clymer opened the public Creek, PPUD-015-84 hearing to consider the Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan approval. The subject site consists of 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue Northeast. Don Erickson, Chief of Current Planning for the Community Development Department, reported that this hearing is a continuation of discussion held at the June 4, 1990, public hearing regarding site access, and to discuss consideration of the amendments to the preliminary PUD site plan, which were initially approved by Council on April 4, 1988. The subject site is 14.06 acres which, under R-2 zoning, would allow an average density of 12.1 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing 72 units on the site or an average density of 5.89 dwelling units per acre, which is less than the current 6 units per acre allowed under the R-1 zone. Mr. Erickson described the proposal to shift some of the townhouses to the south; and advised that of the 13 total buildings, eight contain two-story townhouses and five contain apartments. He indicated that traffic circulation pattern has changed, and the road on the south is now restricted in the revised PUD and will only be used for emergency access. This pattern creates a cul-de-sac with islands for recreational space up to the upper area. Utilities are available to the site; and because of isolation of the site, it would not impact the adjacent single family neighborhoods to the west. Mr. Erickson reported that during initial review, residents in the area had expressed the desire for development to curb trash dumping and motorcycle riding in the vicinity of the subject site. June 18, 1990 enton City Council Minutes Page 184 f In response to Council inquiry pertaining to time constraints for completion of the development, Mr. Erickson noted that the newly adopted PUD ordinance requires a two-year period to submit the final PUD and a showing of progressive development; and further noted that Council may wish to consider a development agreement similar to that of Victoria Hills to assure timely completion of the project. Responding to further inquiry, Larry Springer, Planning Manager, reported that traffic exiting the site would utilize Harrington Avenue NE, and the developer is required to bring the streets to City standards by installing street lights and sidewalks to improve safety for area residents. Audience comment was invited. Reatha Andersen, 1908 Harrington Circle N.E., Renton; Don Brewer, 10218 - 65th Avenue South, Seattle, owner of rentals located at 2011 Jefferson Avenue NE at the entrance to the site; Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton; Virginia Hiramatsu, 2805 NE 23rd Place, Renton; Howard Coupman, 2809 NE 23rd Place, Renton; Diane Coupman, 2809 NE 23rd Place, Renton; Brett Scott, P. O. Box 2752, Renton, property owner near subject site; addressed various concerns which are: 1.) Volume of traffic onto Harrington Avenue and Jefferson Avenue; 2.) Construction of emergency access road, NE 23rd Street, in close proximity to existing homes; 3.) Grade and width of emergency access roadway; 4.) Possible increased traffic flow onto Kirkland Avenue in order to access the Highlands Business District. It was also requested that the emergency access roadway be widened to City standards to allow for additional traffic flow into proposed development, and if the roadway is to remain an emergency access road and gated, that a chain link gate be installed to restrict pedestrian traffic. Henry Jacobson, 13701 S.E. Allen Road, Bellevue, representing Honey Creek Associates, discussed the 18-foot emergency access which has been revised to a full 20-foot width. NE 23rd Street will be an extension of Harrington Avenue NE, which will have street lights and sidewalks, thereby meeting safety requirements. Mr. Jacobson further noted that the grade and vegetation located along the proposed roadway will minimize any noise impact, but still allow for full visibility. Larry Springer, Planning Manager, recommended approval of the revised Honey Creek PPUD-015-84 as proposed by staff. (Staff report available in City Clerk's office.) In response to Council inquiry regarding relocation of NE 23rd Street at least 20 feet away from existing residential property lines, Mr. Jacobson reported that due to instability of the ground, relocation of the road would create an unsafe condition. He advised that the roadway was designed on an existing, stable road bed. Responding to concerns from abutting property owners as to potential damage to their property during construction of the roadway, Mr. Jacobson expressed willingness to discuss the matter of construction easements with the abutting property owners. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler expressed concern about relocating the roadway toward the slope area, thereby endangering the stability of the slopes, and further requested that as much vegetation be preserved as possible. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED IN THE CITY COUNCIL RECORD OF DECISION, WITH THE ADDITIONAL CONDITION THAT THE AREA BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE NEW ROADWAY BE DENSELY LANDSCAPED WITH AS MUCH NATURAL VEGETATION AS POSSIBLE KEPT IN THAT AREA SO YOU CANNOT SEE THROUGH THE LANDSCAPING TO THE ROAD, THAT TIME LINES BE IDENTIFIED IN THE ORDINANCE, AND THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.* For the record, Councilwoman Zimmerman reported that she and her husband own property in the 1700 block of Harrington Avenue NE. She indicated concern regarding the traffic impact generated from the development to the duplex neighborhood along Harrington Avenue NE in the adjacent area, and asked that the matter be reviewed by the Planning Commission. June 18. 1990 enton City Council Minutes Page 185 Responding to Councilman Stredicke's inquiry as to usage of one-way metal teeth embedded in private roadways, Public Works staff agreed to review the matter. In response to further Council inquiry regarding the benefits of private versus public access to the site, Mr. Springer recommended that the roadway be City owned, signed, enforced, and maintained. •ROLL CALL: 3 AYES; 2 NAYS. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL RECESS FOR 5 MINUTES. CARRIED. Time 8:50 p.m. Council reconvened at 8:58 p.m.; roll was called; all Council members present, except Edwards and Tanner, previously excused. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sergeant John Walters, Renton Police Department, announced his resignation Police: Sgt. John Walters to accept the appointment as Police Chief to the City of Mukilteo, effective Resignation July 1, 1990. Sgt. Walters extended appreciation and gratitude to the Mayor, City Council, Police Chief Wallis, and the entire Police Department for training/experience received with the City of Renton, and commended Renton for its outstanding police service. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Vacation: VAC-90-002,City Clerk/Finance submitted petition from Hawk, Newburn, et al. for South 140th Street, Hawk, vacation of portion of South 140th Street, south of Empire Way S.; Public Newburn, et al. Works Department has verified that the petition is valid and signatures represent 100% of abutting property owners. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting public hearing for 8/6/90; and to Board of Public Works for review and classification of vacation. CAG: 90-035, SW Grady City Clerk reported bid opening 5/24/90 for SW Grady Way project, Lind Way - Lind Avenue SW Avenue SW to Rainier Avenue S; 3 bids; engineer's estimate: $290,941.90. to Rainier Avenue S. Refer to Transportation Committee. Police: Law Assistance Police Department requested resolution authorizing execution of interlocal Interlocal Agreement/ agreement with City of Seattle for law enforcement assistance during 1990 Goodwill Games Goodwill Games. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. CAG: 022-88, Oakesdale Public Works Department/Customer Services Division submitted CAG-022- Avenue SW Street 88, Oakesdale Avenue SW Street Improvements from SW Grady Way to SW Improvements from SW 17th Street; and requests approval of the project, authorization for final pay Grady Way to SW 16th estimate in the amount of $994.52, commencement of 30-day lien period, and Street release of retained amount of $116,850.65 to contractor, R. W. Scott Construction Co., if all required releases have been received; and requested reserve of $30,000 from total remaining funds in the amount of $101,124.00 for settlement of potential claim by contractor. Council approve project and refer matter of funding reserve to Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Council President Mathews submitted correspondence received from Martha Citizen Comment: Parker, L. Parker, et al., 18028 187th Avenue SE, Renton, (8 signatures) urging that et al. - Black River the $100,000 King County open space grant be used to protect the heron Corporate Park/ King rookery near SW 7th and Oakesdale, and referred the letter to the County Open Space Administration for response. Funds OLD BUSINESS Committee of the Whole Chairman Mathews presented a report on VISION Committee of the Whole 2020, Regional Council Framework Plan, Intracounty Council, and reported PSCOG: VISION 2020, that the City and PSCOG staff presented a briefing on the five alternatives Regional Council included in VISION 2020. The matter was referred to the Planning and Framework Plan Development Committee for further discussion of the alternatives, and to begin deliberations on the selection of a preferred alternative for presentation to PSCOG. Staff also described the framework plan that has been developed for creation of a new four county regional agency called the Puget Sound Regional Council. The Committee discussed the framework plan and preparation of a letter to King County Councilman Bruce Laing in support of the framework plan. Individual Councilmembers may also want to reply. The discussion of a framework for creating a new intracounty committee within King County) was postponed due to lack of time. MOVED BY Larry Springer, Plat ig Manager TO: Ken Nyberg, Communi _, development Director DATE: - 6/11/90 FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: Honey Creek Preliminary PUD Ordinance C N yN vN roN ti Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: C4 1 x9, 9o Ill Certification of Posting XX Legal Descr Certification of Valid Petition XX Map 0 Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants XX Verify Content Larry - Will need your help on legal and map. These must be attached to ordinance. The attorney indicated that the ordinance should be placed on first reading on June 18, 1990, right after public hearing. Please get back to me AS THANK YOU! Requested by: S JC 6 0 CITY OF RENTON Office of the City Attorney Earl Clymer, Mayor 301±0 S.>11 31O iW 03A13a3`. 066L 8 Os Nri June 8, 1990 W(::iN38 AO Aivl TO: Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE : Ordinance Approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development (Honey Creek Associates PPUD ECF-033-90) Dear Marilyn: I am enclosing the original of the above-entitled ordinance. ic__.Ttivv wrence . Warren LJW:as . Encl . cc : Ways and Means Committee Mayor Council President Ken Nyberg JS, Sr" ' 40; 1,/r A8 . 56 : 62 . 1 (if. c ,C‘ 14‘ v. ,. \` r. ) 71 ? c?3.„,),,,,,. A e u_ Aie,rsc 1- 44' c'TP JNe Q1/4 \ moo 4o/36- u Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PPUD ECF-033-90) WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a preliminary planned unit development for a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has heretofore been filed with the Planning Division; and WHEREAS, a preliminary planned unit development has previously been approved for this development but has undergone a major modification in the areas of access and building locations; and WHEREAS, public hearing were held by the City Council on June 4, 1990, and June 18, 1990, as provided by law on the amended application; and WHEREAS, the applicant for this preliminary planned unit development has voluntarily agreed to the time limits for submittal of the final plan for the planned unit development pursuant to section 4-15-11 .F. 1 of the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I . The preliminary planned unit development, as amended, pertaining to the following described property is approved: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow. ) 1 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION II . The land uses of the preliminary planned unit development are low density single-family residential dwellings (R- 1 ) and low to medium density multi-family residential dwellings (R- 2 ) which will result in a maximum of 72 units within this planned unit development. SECTION III . The effective date of the preliminary planned unit development approval is the effective date of this ordinance, being thirty days after publication. The date of expiration of the appeal shall be pursuant to Section 4-15-11 .F. 1 which will be two years from the date of approval, subject to a one year extension if requested from and approved by the hearing examiner. SECTION IV. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 1990 . Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 1990 . Earl Clymer, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: Ord. 145 : 6-6-90 :as . 2 dir June 4, 1990 nton City Council Minutes Page 163 PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published PUD: Preliminary, Honey in accordance with local and State law, Mayor Clymer opened the public Creek, PPUD-015-84 hearing to consider the Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development. The subject site is 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue Northeast. Larry Springer, Planning Manager for the Community Development Department, presented a chronology of the project which began in late 1984. Mr. Springer reported that the Planning and Development Committee had directed staff to prepare a report and recommendation for final action on the project. Staff presented three options: (1) reject the redesigned emergency access only proposal for NE 23rd and thereby deny the proposed Honey Creek PPUD; (2) approve the redesigned emergency access only proposal for NE 23rd and thereby approve the proposed Honey Creek PPUD, and refer the matter to Ways and Means for action; (3) accept the staff recommendation for revised access to the project, and thereby approve the proposed Honey Creek PPUD including: emergency access only for NE 23rd Street;, emergency access only for the road along the south side of the project; relocate three buildings northward onto the lower part of the site adjacent to the other units. The matter would then be referred to Ways and Means for preparation of an ordinance and set June 18th as a public hearing date where Council can hear testimony on topics other than the access. Upon Council inquiry regarding the revisions and removal of landscape materials, Don Erickson, responded that a considerable amount will be preserved in its natural state. Mr. Erickson noted that there was a cooperative effort with staff, the developer, and other departments in making the revisions to the original plan. Council President Mathews asked if current code and PPUD requirements were being applied to this project since it was originally started in 1983-84 and has not received approval. Mr. Springer referred to City Code Title 4, Chapter 15, Sections 11, 12, 13 regarding timelines on planned unit developments and noted that the new code should be added as an amendment to the recommendations offered by staff in the report submitted to Council prior to final of the project. He noted that the letters from the Fire Marshall and Public Works Department had been received concurring that the redesigned emergency access meets the requirements presented to the Planning and Development Committee in December 1989. Council asked for clarification regarding the subject for discussion pertaining to the PPUD. Staff verified that the public notice specifically stated that the public hearing was on the access of the Honey Creek project. Council President Mathews reiterated that the access issue is the only type of testimony to be heard before Council at this time. Comment from the audience was invited. Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, stated his opposition to the redesigned access. Mr. Murray noted concerns regarding the allowance of less than 20 foot width for the proposed emergency access; no allowance for gravel or drainage material; no guardrails along the road; the right of way below minimum standards. He recommended Devil's Elbow as the alternative for access which could be stabilized and also serve as a bike corridor and access to the sewer pump station at the base of the area. He requested that the revised access be denied because it is inappropriate to take action without a review by the hearing examiner as an independent analysis to clarify whether it meets code and allow public to have input. Virginia Hiramatsu, 2805 NE 23rd Place, Renton, stated that she is not opposed to the development itself but believes that the public would be better served with the plans as presented by Mr. Murray. Howard Coupman, 2809 NE 23rd Place, Renton, reiterated points made by Mr. Murray regarding Devil's Elbow as an possible alternative and stated his opposition to the current redesign. John Sargent, 2016 Edmonds Avenue NE, Renton, property owner next to the subject site stated that he felt there should be more negotiations. He expressed concerns regarding the need for retaining walls due to the unstable ground along the creek bed and the necessity for a wider emergency access road. Henry Jacobson, 13701 SE Allen Road, Bellevue, representing Honey Creek Associates, addressed the 18 foot access. He noted that the emergency access through the main entrance is a full 20 feet wide, and is an extension of a June 4, 1990 nton City Council Minutes Page 164 City street that would be on Harrington. It is a full City-wide street that has lights and sidewalks. It is designed to be safety conscious and has good visibility. He also noted that there are three different accesses to the development, and he has spent many hours working with the City to achieve beneficial results. He stated that he disagrees with the Devil's Elbow alternative presented by Mr. Murray. Bob Tomberg, 5611 - 119th SE, Bellevue, owner of the subject property, stated that he has worked on this project for six years; it has not been a rapid decision. There has been a lot of negotiation on both sides and he believes this is a good compromise for all concerned. He reiterated that Devil's Elbow is not a viable alternative for this project which is the opinion of experts from the City and County and other professionals. In his opinion, the emergency access on 23rd is not necessary but provided as an extra benefit to the development. He stated that the project as recommended by staff meets all the requirements. I John Best, 3337 - 259th Place, Issaquah, representative of Burnside Construction Company, who is purchasing the property to develop, noted that his company has a long history in development of quality neighborhoods. He stressed that the access as shown, especially the primary access, is adequate in and of itself in providing alternative emergency access. He stated that he is a developer who has had a long track record with successful projects on the east side. Randy Corman, 2216 Harrington Place NE, Renton, stated that after reviewing the staff recommendations to City Council, he disagreed with the report regarding the traffic route. He referred to Item 25 and 26 regarding the traffic flow through the neighborhood stating that this route through a single family neighborhood would be heavily impacted and recommended that further study be done on street improvements in the neighborhood or scaling down on the proposed number of units. Further Council discussion followed regarding the number of chained fences for emergency access within the City and the number of times these accesses have been used in emergency situations. Glen Gordon, Fire Battalion Chief, responded that the City has approximately 15 chained emergency accesses and in 20 years, these have been seldom used. Councilman Edwards asked why the NE 23rd emergency access is necessary when there is a southerly access. Mr. Gordon explained that the road splits inside the development and if the south road is blocked, emergency vehicles cannot access the development. Therefore, there should be two separate accesses to the development. Councilwoman Zimmerman asked whether approval of the access as presented would give approval of the site plan. Mr. Springer explained that if the emergency access on 23rd is approved, that means the PPUD is approved as shown and then the final PUD could be started. Another public hearing could be held to discuss other items including relocation of buildings and modification of the site plan. Upon Council inquiry as to the redesign of the site plan, Mr. Springer answered that it was the result of combined efforts of the Planning and Development Committee and Mr. Jacobson, the potential purchaser of the PUD. Mr. Jacobsen redesigned the project and resubmitted it with the changes of the relocation of the three buildings. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON ALL ACCESSES INCLUDING THE EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE PPUD. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE PPUD TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE AND SET PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 18, 1990 TO DISCUSS THE RELOCATION OF THREE UNITS INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS AS STATED IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PAGE 5, ITEM C, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL PAGE 6 WITH AMENDMENT TO #8 TO INCLUDE THE NEW PUD REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE TITLE 4, CHAPTER 15, SECTIONS 11, 12, AND 13.* June 4. 1990 nton City Council Minutes Page 165 Councilwoman Zimmerman requested that the traffic impact to the duplex neighborhood in the adjacent area on Harrington Avenue NE be addressed and studied. Further Council inquiry regarding improvements to roads and sidewalks and school safety in the area of Harrington NE and Jefferson was answered by Mr. Springer who reported that the Public Works Department has studied the areas of concern and recommended certain safety improvements be completed 1 by the developer. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, requested Council advance to Old Advancement Requested Business to discuss the North Soos Creek Annexation. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, NORTH SOOS CREEK ANNEXATION. CARRIED. Annexation: North Soos Ken Nyberg, Director of Community Development Department, introduced Creek (Fairwood) Nancy Laswell Morris, Chief, Long-Range Planning, and Fred Fortine, Senior Planner, who presented a report on the relation of the Growth Management program to the North Soos Creek project and the pros and cons of the North Soos Creek Annexation for taxpayers in Renton. Referring to a map which showed sphere of influence, potential annexation boundaries and areas where city services are provided, Ms. Laswell Morris explained the current way planning is done in the city through an inter- jurisdictional planning puzzle between the city and county which includes transportation, land use, housing, utilities, and capital facilities. She reported that the Growth Management Bill mandates five major elements in growth management planning which are land use, housing, capital facilities plan municipal land uses such as parks, etc), utilities and transportation. She stated that growth management mandates a balanced approach as compared to an isolated plan for the City. Ms. Laswell Morris explained a balanced system under the growth management which incorporates the five elements in relation to needs and the infrastructure capacity. Under this plan, the City becomes the focus with a series of four sectors radiating from the City, thus the North Soos Creek area becomes much more related to the City of Renton relative to planning. She further explained that under growth management, primary goals are an urban/rural boundary; concurrency, which is finance as you go with a focus on transportation; consistency between jurisdictions; a mandatory allocation of population growth in which the State will assign populations to the jurisdictions; and allocation of municipal land uses. Ms. Laswell Morris noted that according to the growth management act, the City would be required to analyze the North Soos Creek area because it would be within the City's eastern urban growth boundary, with the possibility of a southern boundary between Renton and Kent. Also, there would be an infrastructure analysis of expansion of City services such as transportation, water, sewer, storm water; and an analysis of municipal land uses such as library, fire, police, parks, and public works. Because of the annexation study by the City, certain elements of growth management have already been studied which include land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities and transportation. Ms. Laswell Morris presented the pros and cons in the areas of political influence, financial impact, land use, and municipal services. She then explained the general overview of the work program from June 1990 to November 1991 which included an immediate work program from June to October 1990 of public information, fact cards, public workshops and statistically valid surveys of both Renton residents and NSC residents. She presented the administration's recommendation to go forward with the work program and bring back to Council in October 1990 a go/no go decision based on facts, surveys of both groups, workshops and other community input. She explained that if the Council decides to go forward, then boundaries would have to be set for all, a portion, or larger than the initial study. In this particular time frame, an election in November 1991 would determine the annexation issue with an effective date of annexation on January 1, 1992. The reason for the November election is due to the timing of the work program, fiscal considerations and the cost of the election. CHRONOLOGY Honey Creek PPUD March, 1985 Hearing Examiner denied the original PPUD based on an inaccurate density calculation. January, 1986 Hearing Examiner recommends approval of a 72 unit PPUD having primary access off of Jefferson Avenue NE, and emergency access only off of 20 foot wide ROW at NE 23rd Street. April and May, 1986 Council generally concurs with Hearing Examiner's recommendation, but requires that the secondary access at NE 23rd Street be on a full 40 wide public ROW with full City standard improvements. September, 1986 Honey Creek Associates requests City assistance in acquiring additional ROW to comply with the condition to widen NE 23rd Street. October, 1987 City agrees to proceed with condemnation for 20 feet of NE 23rd Street ROW, but notifies the developers that it will be at their expense. April, 1988 A King County Superior Court decision prohibits the City from using eminent domain to acquire ROW to primarily benefit a private applicant. July, 1989 Applicant requests that Council reconsider its requirement that NE 23rd Street be upgraded to a full 40 foot wide street. Council concurs, but requests information from Public Works regarding impacts on Jefferson Ave NE, and from Fire Department regarding the adequacy of a 20 foot wide ROW for emergency access only along NE 23rd Street. December, 1989 Planning and Development Committee accepted staff reports regarding access, and some potential modifications to the site plan. The Committee directed staff to prepare a report and recommendation for final action at Council public hearing. COUNCIL OPTIONS Honey Creek PPUD o Reject the redesigned emergency access only proposal for NE 23rd and thereby DENY the proposed Honey Creek PPUD. o Approve the redesigned emergency access only proposal for NE 23rd and thereby APPROVE the proposed Honey Creek PPUD. Refer the matter to Ways and Means for preparation of an ordinance. o Accept the staff recommendation for revised access to the project, and thereby APPROVE the proposed Honey Creek PPUD including: emergency access only for NE 23rd Street emergency access only for the road along the south side of the project relocate buildings H, I, and J northward onto the lower part of the site adjacent to the other units Refer the matter to Ways and Means for preparation of an ordinance, and set June 18th as a public hearing date, where Council can accept testimony on topics other than access. 21 A /ENI.IE NE,-EXI TINC 2QI-6I PIgHT--OF W/Y Ni ExIS-TINC CIF of D. 111 CONC.KETE FZETA\ ININefrTfEPOCHSIOF t OF OFF.I\./E, I 10 b : Tt111 -; X - -r i I 'JC1 I G I f Y G I E'xls A - A: section at n.e. 23rd street emergency access road 11- 11 I I 1 N.E. 23RD PL. 1 1 1 I 1N 1 14 EXISTING ASPHALT 16 N. WITH GUI. r 15 1 A EXISTING Lap , N.E. 23RD MICE STREET 1 1 B IEs i. 366.1 3100.1. 358.2 357.0 355.1 t 3tob.8 3to3.2 3 3 9fi `t. \3 5, I 3. I 375.8 375.2 \3b5.4 D l3o.o 3722 \3107.9 `3102.1 \359.3\351°.3`35Z[ 1 37.0 1 II1 IIA 1 1 yW `' I I J - t L-- EXISTIfll HOUSEIz Il 0. z o I \ \z I1 cc F l t I 4a II I I I c PROrUSED 1 I I I 24 DRIVEWAY I 1 li I11 I I \ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON CITY COUNCIL RECORD OF DECISION APPLICANT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES/ SKIP JACOBSON FILE NO.: PPUD-15-84 Vicinity of the 2200 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST:Approval of a revised preliminary PUD application for a multiple-family development with 72 dwelling units on 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek. The following report incorporates the Findings and Conclusions of the original report of the Hearing Examiner issued on March 4, 1985, which was later revised in the Hearing Examiner's report of January 17, 1986. Changes in some of the findings reflect the modified site plan for the P.U.D. FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Skip Jacobson, requests approval of a revision to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development (P.P.U.D) application for the Honey Creek P.U.D. The Honey Creek P.U.D. proposal consists of 72 dwelling units on approximately 14.06 acres of property. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, the previous decisions by the Hearing Examiner, and a revised site plan together with a remand and other pertinent documentation are a part of the record for the application. In addition, documentation includes decisions regarding on-site access. 3. The City Council, on April 14, 1986, adopted the recommendations of the Planning and Development Committee, approving the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner, as amended, to rezone the PUD site subject to: 1) submission of a final PUD; 2) annexation of the site into the City; 3) dedication of a full 40-foot right-of-way on N.E. 23rd; 4) submission with a final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis; 5) submission of detailed plans for the final PUD showing usable open space, recreation and building details; 6) provision of a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the subject site or portions of it were sold; 7) submission of a detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc.; 8) elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st Street; 9) the property zoned R-1 shall have no development pending the City being provided detailed geotechnical information regarding site and site plan or PUD approval; and, 10) acknowledgement that current plans are for conceptual approval of a PPUD and do not vest in the applicant or assign any development rights on the subject parcel or property without recommendations of City staff and approval by Council of the geotechnical studies called for above. 4. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's Responsible Official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance on October 21, 1985. The Committee reviewed the revised request on October 16, 1985 and determined that the original determination is valid for the proposed revisions to the P.U.D. site plan. 5. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter on or between April 24, 1984 and October 10, 1985 and in succeeding years as needed to resolve issues. 6. The subject site is located in the vicinity of 2200 Jefferson Avenue N.E., immediately south and generally east of 120th Place S.E., more commonly known as Devil's Elbow. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4095, enacted on November 25, 1987. 8. The subject site is a portion of a 47.7 acre site rezoned by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4141, enacted on March 24, 1988. The subject parcel received an R-2, Residential zoning classification which is a low density multiple-family zone allowing 12.1 dwelling units per acre. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as being suitable for the development of greenbelt and low density multiple-family uses, but does not allow such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The configuration of the existing site was created through a lot line adjustment in King County approved in 1986. 11. A steep ravine is located adjacent to the property line running diagonally from the northernmost point of the property to the southeast corner of the site. Honey Creek is located at the bottom of this steep ravine. 12. Access to the subject site is limited due to the complex topography of the subject parcel and adjacent parcel to the northeast and east, and given the existing development pattern in the general area. Development surrounding the subject site is mixed. To the north and immediately north/northeast and east are undeveloped parcels of property which includes the majority of the ravine area and Honey Creek. To the east are single-family uses, generally clustered in single- family subdivisions. The property south of the site is developed with senior housing and duplex housing complexes developed during World War II. Finally, to the west, development consists of single-family residences. 13. The site, at one time, was part of an old quarry. The relatively level plateau, on which the development is proposed, is the result of the quarry activity. An old road grade was cut into the site from Devil's Elbow to approximately the area of the subject site. 14. Sewer service will be available to the site via hookup to the Honey Creek interceptor sewer which runs through the bottom of the adjacent ravine. 15. Storm drainage from the site will flow into Honey Creek, a fish spawning stream. Because of this, biofiltration of surface water runoff should occur before storm drainage discharges into this stream. 16. Water lines will need to be extended from Harrington Avenue N.E. to serve the site. 17. Considerable discussion has taken place over the years on the issue of access to the site. The public opposition to the development has focussed mostly upon site access, the inadequacy of the adjacent roads, and the impacts of traffic at these access points upon the adjacent single-family neighborhood. Both N.E. 21st Street and N.E. 23rd Street were found to be substandard streets, for example. The now proposed access road off of Jefferson Avenue N.E. will have grades of 10% to 15°A°. Devil's Elbow was dropped from consideration because of its grades as well as the fact that it had experienced continued instability. The Public Works Department has determined that Devil's Elbow is"not safe for either primary access or emergency access." 18. In March 1985, the original PPUD application for this site was denied by the Hearing Examiner based upon inaccurate density calculations. At that time, primary access was from Jefferson Avenue N.E., with a second access on N.E. 21st Street. A 20-foot wide, gated emergency access road was provided along N.E. 23rd Street. Following resubmittal in January 1986, the Hearing Examiner recommended the elimination of the second access on N.E. 21st Street and also required that the applicant bear the cost of upgrading these access roads. 19. With the elimination of the N.E. 21st Street access and the shifting of access to the south, the Council required, at its meeting on April 14, 1986, the "...dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of- way alignment with N.E. 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue N.E. and the site, with an engineering report and specifications for full street improvement as required by City Code." Because of subsequent difficulties in acquiring the necessary right-of-way, the applicants, Honey Creek Associates, asked the City in September, 1986 to assist them by starting condemnation proceedings (at the owners expense) against the owners of the adjacent properties. 20. On April 4, 1988, Council approved Honey Creek PPUD (PPUD-015-84) which became effective May 9, 1988 (Ordinance No. 4143). 21. In June of 1988, neighbors near the site supported the proposed Honey Creek PUD development as an improvement that would "discourage crime, dumping, and motorcycle access in the area." 22. After the City began condemnation proceedings, this matter was later appealed to the courts by one of the property owners whose property was being condemned. A Superior Court decision issued on April 25, 1988 barred the City from using eminent domain to acquire a full right-of-way on N.E. 23rd Street (it was felt that the City was using its powers to primarily benefit a private applicant). 23. At another public hearing on the PPUD on June 19, 1989, the Council was asked to decide whether to retain the approved PPUD requirement of two full access roads to the site or to reduce the requirement to one access road along N.E. Jefferson with a twenty foot, gated emergency access road on N.E. 23rd Street. The Council decided not to take action on this date. 24. At a subsequent meeting on July 24, 1989, the Council, in response to a request from the applicant, passed a motion to amend the PPUD to eliminate its earlier requirement that the applicant provide full street improvements including a 40-foot wide public right-of-way alignment along N.E. 23rd Street. Instead, Council called for the road to be improved only for emergency vehicle access using the twenty (20) feet of right-of-way that the City owns on N.E. 23rd Street. That motion also asked the Public Works Department to review the adequacy of streets serving the 2- southern exit from the site as well as look at safety issues on these streets and report back to Council. Staff determined that these streets were designed for local access as defined in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The size, construction and maintenance plans for these streets also indicates local access status. Neighborhood collectors per the Subdivision Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan are to be 60 feet-paved for 36 feet. 25. The traffic analysis prepared for the subject proposal predicted 60% of the PPUD development's traffic will travel south from the project site toward Kirkland Avenue N.E. The remainder of the traffic from this area of the site would travel north and west of the site. 26. Under the previous (1985) site plan, which had its primary access from N.E. 21st Street as well as Jefferson, residents along these streets were concerned that ingress and egress and subsequent improvements along these streets would open up an even more direct route through a residential neighborhood. This concern has been reduced under the latest site plan (drawing dated 1-24-90, see Exhibit "A") which limits primary access to Jefferson Avenue N.E. Traffic leaving the development heading north under the revised proposal would now have to exit via Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. Traffic traveling southward would likely travel the same route, but continue south on Edmonds Avenue N.E. 27. In June of 1989, Public Works evaluated whether N.E. 21st should be evaluated as an alternative to N.E. 23rd Street. They concluded there was: 1) insufficient right-of-way; and 2) traffic will pass through a single-family residential area. 28. On September 13, 1989, the Public Works Department reported back to the Council on improvements it felt were necessary to ensure pedestrian safety due to increased traffic generated by the subject proposal on September 25, 1989. This report was subsequently referred back to the Planning and Development Committee for their consideration. 29. The Planning and Development Committee held several meetings to study this matter. On December 11, 1989, the Planning and Development Committee recommended, and the Council approved, the following street improvement conditions: a.The developer will improve the road on its project to city standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. It is anticipated that the road will be dedicated to the city. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of the street. b.The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E., as follows: 1.Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. 2.Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E. which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. c.The developer will install the following school safety improvements: 1.A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E. with appropriate signing should be required. 2.Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E., south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. 30. Pursuant to this action, the applicant has proposed to use N.E. 23rd street as a gated emergency access. Although the City owns 20 feet of right-of-way on the extension of N.E. 23rd Street, not all of this can be used for improved roadway since a retaining wall has to be built along a portion of it. The Fire Department, on March 21, 1990, indicated that there is sufficient right-of-way to build the emergency access provided that the width of the paved portion of the right-of-way is not less than 18 feet wide. The applicants submitted revised plans on March 7, 1990 showing that this requirement could be met. Further, the applicant retained Terra Associates, Inc. to evaluate the adequacy of the proposed concrete retaining walls on either side of the roadway. The engineers determined that the design shown for the roadway improvements could be accomplished. 31. Density calculations which were based upon the PUD formula were originally a subject of dispute. With the revised PPUD plans, this issue is essentially resolved. The only potential area for dispute in the current case might be over the choice of contour intervals used in calculating steep slopes and the subsequent densities allowed. The Building and Zoning Department (now part of the 3- Community Development Department) had primary jurisdiction for determining the density. It appears the Department made a reasonable determination of the density in 1985. In addition, its decision was not disputed at the time. 32. The total number of units, barring slope, street and dedication deductions which could be accommodated on those portions of the site for which the applicant has requested R1 zoning would be 48.36, while 72 units could be accommodated on that portion of the site zoned R2, for a total of 120.36 units on the original 14.06 acre portion of the site currently under consideration. Dedications would reduce the acreage by approximately 0.85 acres or 5.1 units, and street set asides would reduce the acreage by 1.6 acres or 9.6 units. The slope formula used by the City staff, deducting the most acreage due to severe slope, would reduce the development potential by 31.9% or 33.71 units. The total would permit 71.95 units which was just .05 units below the applicant's request of 72 units. 33. The potential 72 units are planned only for that portion of the site lying to the south and west of Honey Creek. 34. No population projections or school age student projections were made for the subject proposal by staff in 1985. Using current standards, we would estimate that the 72 units of multi-family townhouses and flats would generate approximately 29 school age children. This compares to an estimated 26 school age children if the site were developed with an estimated 43 single-family homes. 35. The project, with its 72 units, would generate an estimated 430 vehicle trips per day. Comparisons were drawn indicating that the development of approximately 43 single-family homes (under single-family zoning on this site) would generate, at 10.0 AWDTE per dwelling unit a similar amount of traffic as 72 units at 6.5 AWDTE per dwelling unit (468 vehicle trips per day). 36. The majority of soils found on the site are sandy soils of Class III. Such soils typically imply that such a site would be susceptible to erosion, earthquake and landslide damage. Slides occurred while the sewer line was being installed in the creek bed, and other slides and sloughs have occurred in the past along the steep walls above Honey Creek, both on and off the subject site. The applicant has addressed this by restricting their development to those portions of the site having a mean average slope of less than 10 percent. In addition, the use of native vegetation buffers on steep slopes should be provided to further reduce the likelihood of slides. CONCLUSIONS 1. The development of the subject site using the PUD provisions of the Building Regulations would appear to be in the public interest. The unique topography and environment of the subject site can best be protected by clustering new development on those portions of the site that are less prone to erosion or landslide damage and staying away from areas having steeper slopes such as along Honey Creek. The 1982 PUD provisions allow such density clustering when it is in the public interest. The proposed 72 multi-family units would not produce substantially more traffic than a 43 unit single-family residential development (permitted under the current zoning). The PUD appears to present a reasonable method of developing an environmentally sensitive site, permits the applicant reasonable use of the site (which is private property) and appears to protect the site's fragile environment better than most other uses except possibly a park or open space use. The latter, however, would do little to police the site and reduce unauthorized use of the site by those dumping litter, shooting off firecrackers, and driving motorcycles across it. 2. The topographical isolation of the site would also appear sufficient to avoid any adverse impacts from incompatible housing types or densities on adjoining properties. Whereas under the 1985 site plan, buildings in the southwest corner of the site were within 90 feet of the western and southern property lines. Under the latest 1990 site plan, there is at least a 190 foot separation from the nearest residential building to the southern or western property lines. The housing under this latest site plan would be clustered and encircle the level westerly plateau, which would be left for open space purposes. 3. Multi-family dwelling units at this location would allow for more variety and diversity in the existing neighborhood and allow more housing choices for those who wish to reside in this part of the City, be they existing or new residents. At this stage, the applicant has not provided a definitive plan for the different multi-family housing types being proposed. Only a schematic proposal, as is required for Preliminary PUDs, has been submitted at this time. A breakdown as to unit size, type and number of bedrooms should be provided for all units and buildings in the PUD. 4. The issue of slope stability has not yet been adequately addressed. While the site seems suitable from a land use perspective for a PUD of 72 units, the geological underpinnings of the site need to be more fully explored. With the submission of the Final PUD, the applicant will have to present a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Department of Community Development and the Public Works Departments. The report 4- shall include, but not be limited to, information regarding: site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their current state; long term implications of development on slope stability; geologic hazard including earthquake analysis; plans for site preparation and restoration, as well as building construction techniques that will minimize ground instability and/or subsidence due to settling or erosion. The applicant should be required to provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is ever sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowners/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. 5. The access concerns of residents remain even with the scaling down of the proposal from 120 units to 72 units. It is not just the increased population of the subject proposal, but the creation of a new defacto "through" street - connection along Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. to N.E. 16th Street which raises concerns about safety to nearby residents and school age children. The streets surrounding the subject site to the south were not designed as collector streets, and in their current state should not be utilized as such. Even with the upgrading of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. with street improvements, and surface upgrading, the proposed access to the site may pose some problems to nearby residents since homes along these streets are located closer to the street than would normally be the case along collector streets. 6. The applicant's latest proposal, using Jefferson Avenue N.E. for primary access and N.E. 23rd Street as a gated emergency approach to the site, makes sense now that the City's Fire Marshal has agreed to accept a roadway width of less than 20 feet on N.E. 23rd Street. Many other complexes, such as Cedar Ridge and Woodcliffe, have one primary entry with an emergency access which is gated, and some, such as Forest Brook, only have one entry point. With the elimination of secondary access and the changing of N.E. 23rd Street into emergency access only, there no longer is a need to keep the previously proposed secondary access along N.E. 21st Street. 7. The site plan for the Preliminary PUD now appears reasonable and should be approved. (NOTE: Plans for the Final PUD would have to follow the layout shown in the Preliminary PUD but also be more detailed and show the requisite open space, recreation areas, and building design details.) DECISION: Based upon the above analysis, the Council hereby approves the preliminary P.U.D., File PPUD-015-84, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a detailed geotechnical report with the submission of the final PUD application. The report shall address site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their existing state; analyze the long term erosion potential by the development; identify geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; provide specifics on site preparation and restoration; and identify appropriate building techniques for the site. 2. The applicant shall construct and maintain gated secondary emergency access along the right-of- way of N.E. 23rd Street which shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall and Public Works Director, with a minimum width of 18 feet of paving. 3. The applicant shall provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. In addition, the applicant shall record covenants running with the land requiring that the slope on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as closely as is possible in its natural state. 4. The applicant shall improve the road on its project to City standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. The roadway shall be dedicated to the City. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of the street. 5. The applicant shall improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E., as follows: 1.Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. 2.Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E. which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. 5- 6. The applicant shall install the following school safety improvements: a.A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E., with appropriate signing, should be required. b.Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E., south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. 7. The submittal of detailed plans for the final PUD, providing a description of the usable open space, recreation and building details. 8. The final PUD shall comply with relevant City PUD review criteria (contained in Section 4-15-5 and 4-15-10 of the City Code) as they pertain to: separation of pedestrian and vehicular circulation; privacy within and between units; preservation of views and natural features; siting of carports and/or garages; treatment of exterior building surfaces for aesthetic and durability reasons; lighting; signage; and landscaping. 9. The applicant shall comply with all existing and any subsequent mitigation conditions imposed by the City's responsible SEPA official, the Environmental Review Committee. 10. The applicant shall submit a detailed tree inventory and landscaping and on-site improvements plan acceptable to the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 11. The applicant shall submit plans and bonds for all on and off site improvements stipulated by the Public Works Department, including those improvements identified in their memo of September 13, 1990 to the Council. 12. The applicant shall submit a detailed construction impact mitigation plan acceptable to the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 13. The applicant shall work with Community Development and Parks and Recreation Department staff to develop appropriate on-site recreation facilities for future residents prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 14. The final PUD shall comply with the time limits for PUDs as set forth in Section 4-15-11.F. of the City Code. 6- JITY MAP LCUHL IJCO6.ir111- I IV IN I , Q 60 rrnlloysaA--_zz. I i', fir >,o le-..- eS---.- 4,74 um!. 72 win; i •r 1 •- y1C •?- • I'fl: ANI:A: 412,450 S.Y. (14.06 ACNE':) f' .//. r /] Y r or UEOICATIUII: 79,750 5.1. 1 4, 0 1TE AREA: 512,700 S.Y. (12.21 ACRES) 11 L, ' , 1 ITI: OF.IIS ITY: 5.19 lllllTS/ACNI: 511y / I 1:-12 72 UIIITS x 1.5 1011 STAI.IS i ,: O/ •• / l;' Gyn,1-„ 2 i_ \ cocsT rnuxnw TornI. 1'fS.-x—•ti--_ 26 STALIS Ti // PP.q 1'U'1'A I. 126 ST'A I.Il: L q r I IIC I'IIOVI DEW I)O STAI.IS I '•' 1 C-'t lil. ... 1(( r /'20 CIII CO.GII 4ANAC1_: gyp ' C % Ct - -•. i;.:_ r.-• R. rums 52 CARIOPT9 Y I j\ TY"."'""" sr y.OI.1:11 NTAlIS 1 S 1 cit, I ,'I` 1. \ (AtillI li11.-I. . , \... -. '. i.nt c...____) C---, I__. , - . t_ . . ...-.___\ •„:).A‘). ••i 1 3.f lb t 7 :. ) s'. - '.., 1 rs**-1f___)'. .: r ((((// ) (\-' ' F ) , , 14. r.------c , i fl P • — I. 7._. 'w-:t17'4 I JJ ) i 11_ f :r. - .:10 ..„. •' us ltkil*V. 4:'-'12.4 li r -( - . c .. - PL:. -,-, 1 ... . 4 , ' .'.'•• v. 1 y, ...fli. 1.- 1(- 7 10(f/ i'-)/(. 11/:"-, ' •• 3 N: /i- - - ' pp ....~ NIP' n.i- lit• it y• r I ikip i . ) i ) .., .11, 1 i n1l-n ' mot 71+',•jIIII ',• •F;^4iwn wif' / 72' • / 1.?.:_... 4-. 2.5' • .1iVIS kill 111 4 7 1).r ''. .‘° \ '. ; . L.L._ . .,___.',,__ ..__ ._,. ..... s • , •'•" • ,' ' ,ita f••••'.. i 7.77......:::1/ 5, 0 ..•.;-•:. Y •-• ..•• IliA10), 1 ( ii / / i --__ - dr:.:-/ I iiii'0111 1 51 4. ---- 7 t c.._..._/ / , I o 7').-- i .1. / i. i. 1 - :,...-..... ' L., i . • x..._ ,• ‘. -k,i 7,- (/ , b-.‘ ‘ Wd% J a-H 1^ •- 4.,.. ",- 4/ Z ..../- i.._........ Ii - \ AVE. N.E. cY • y 00 by y0) F- 01 n M I 4 QV 1 M N• Ili SITE n y Gz„k aIs-$y AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 50640 t l 1 .1C Kathleen Hoover being first duly sworn on.oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition CITY OF RENTON Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six BY monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Renton City Council has fixed the 18th day County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal of June, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council byorder of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ChambersMillo the Renton South, Renton, Build- newspaper g ing, 200 Avenue Renton, Wash- King County. ington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Accept testimony on Honey creek Pre- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition liminary Planned Unit Development Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition and not in PPUD), modification to site plan. The supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers proposal consists of 72 multifamily units g period. Publicic Notice on 12.23 acres located north of Jeffer- during the below stated The annexed notice a son Avenue NE and east of NE 21st Street (PPUD-015-84). Notice of Public Hearing)R4 2 0 8 Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapprov- al or opinions on this matter. was published on June 8, 1990 CITY OF RENTON Marilyn J. Petersen, CMC City Clerk Published in the Valley Daily News June The full amount9% f the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 8, 1990. R4208 sum of$ fr( Subscribed and sworn before me this 15 t h day of June 19 9 0 2 92' blicfor the State ofWashingtonrYg residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VIM Ne7 Revised 4/89 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 18th day of June, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Accept testimony on Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPUD), modification to site plan. The proposal consists of 72 multifamily units on 12.23 acres located north of Jefferson Avenue NE and east of NE 21st Street (PPUD-015-84). Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on this matter. CITY OF RENTON Marilyn J. ersen, CMC City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION: June 8, 1990 Valley Daily News Account #50640 A NOTICE RENTON CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ON J UN E 18, 1990 AT 7:30 P. M. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBER: 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 24rH sr.. J i®,; n° R"F" D" • i, i 23R0:_ L HONEY CREEK PRELIMINARY 1';'_ irjrZ PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 2 J F MODIFICATION TO SITE 0-i ,.v..-., Q PLAN , PROPOSAL CONSISTS JJ N.E.= OF 12. 23 ACRESLOCATEDrr 2/' t'_ ° .`\ NORTH OF JEFFERSON AVENUE 1.1 0 n , ' x 3 4c 111 r - /;gib' 4 .5 ,,,a' ° a Ch°,I.r J. NE AND EAST OF NE 21ST iii? c. • x.n c,i x,.11. . E ,*'.—, t: " c qi,.S^ a . r ''Q ;3 Hur1.°ch ICI N i'r 6 , C, fail 7` lVP V X. STREET. 7- „ la I(I.I tom,• • z FILE NO, PPUD-015-84 N q 7 \°:`d ,...•, 0 / / A 0 a 5 Sondra J.unit, t610 k `° 1.7I r. ev Z s . - TRAC 5 97 {' .. c,..,s.rgi„650i1 T 7 c i.1. 3 • U3 1 0.74 Ac. j i i Z Norl Highlonds w, —,. . I 7 5,,: EpC Q Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235- 50 The removal, mutila±ecw, des!r;,•s±:on Warn I flgor• concealment of this notice is a mis- demeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. CLI 1 II ILA ION STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. li li fl i;i'v/2)1_ r.- v -r) • 105-6- -3-c. 1-e-:er / "t -hI I 4yr-i-7- ., 714,5T.-- 3-4sVEI71.- ri 6_, -sK0 -_--97661- •IUM4T . // li its1/ 63gO' CiTer. -11-- .6 7- 7,0176/ )2,)E-e -y. w- egmr- 7r -- ram)- t-.--.- 1J_-•t. nvITI -7-41-4177± )1 .1t q---yi -crig-r10-4?-7=r-Ft) 5eLb-T.T 7Y /duovt- 44- 7}-1GEaz1 o) 7/7/ I* r1-1147-21- 167b)C ij 7- - /24 ,4•••w17;77.---L' E4) I" ' t l; 06SPJlig)(,t- it J 10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT:DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT May 29, 1990 SUMMARY:. >, ; .: ...;::::>:>: :::.:::- :: ... HONEY CREEKASSOCIATESAPPLICANT. .;` ;:::>: ;::; ::::;... ...._ SKIP JACOBSON, PROJECT: HONEY CREEK PUD ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: PPUD-15-84 DESCRIPTION.OF PROPOSAL: Approval of a revised preliminary PUD application for a multi-family development with 72 dwelling units on 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Vicinity of the 2200 Block of Jefferson Avenue Northeast. 1RECoMMENDATIoN Staff are recommending that City Council accept these latest revisions to the applicant's proposed Preliminary PUD since most of them appear to be the result of changes suggested by the City over the last few months, and approve the Preliminary PUD with conditions. Staff now believe that most major issues of concern relating to the general configuration and layout of the PUD including density, open space, and circulation, have now been worked out to the satisfaction of City reviewing departments and neighboring property owners. 3 S i . r 7 fhF • .r V bAlti 2'#' 24TH ST.• a a 1.1:1- 9," i VI:7 U yy 15-g4-23 -7;• rJ ,. ,r ` ,r.Irk a 2° a 2°'' The v 2 a n i ' nieR1Dyi 23RD PL 'n.r. ,1 iltglirliNtir 11111*.,,,,,,, 4 T_ 3T-- l o 2Sati—y ----- - 1 r nt 4 pi WI o N.Ene2fS =_ST` i--.w.. W a .'C . ., vI. i of m e 1, 4 CI - p . wr urc mot- rr r :,- b r, rr.r /i\ ir,it , may. .i,J.l --. Ids: TJ 4_ xT_ x a cti,s,er J. i i.iPc. x ' 1 13 t L " fi e , P re *Y", . r I\ O A` Har/>ock 4 Fr-- 9 C s NLr o•.t O W• P P' 1V. a 7~ s E 'i J `=•/' 0 ,4 s` Sandra J.MIII er Zj' Cl e 1 1t S e c Z y rs y (1/ ni o RI ' n. .3 > n WE"- psi _ y o- u,i. a 0.74Ac. i w ° 1 `I aeo B i 11 X 1 1Aw1r1 IDoo \` I iio r,w jh 105Ac. iy. '; = Z Nortti Highlands 4;A;,* r.°?. r. a P anned Unit Development Sta Report Honey Creek Preliminary PUD May 29, 1990 Rage 2 3ACKGROUND The 14.06 acre triangular site currently is heavily treed and vegetated and has two plateau areas between steeper sloped areas that traverse it. Honey Creek runs in a northwesterly direction along what would be the hypotenuse of the triangle). The west and southern edges of the site are bordered by single-family dwellings. Hillcrest Elementary School and North Highlands Park lie to the south across Harrington and Kirkland Avenues. Although theoretically, the site could accommodate as many as 120.36 dwelling units, required roadway dedications, and steep slope considerations reduced this to 71.95 dwelling units. The applicant has proposed 72 dwelling units in their latest revision to this Preliminary PUD application. The City Council, on April 14, 1986, adopted the recommendations of the Planning and Development Committee, approving the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner, as amended, to rezone the PUD site subject to: 1) submission of a final PUD; 2) annexation of the site into the City; 3) dedication of a full 40-foot right-of-way on N.E. 23rd; 4) submission with a final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis; 5) submission of detailed plans for the final PUD showing usable open space, recreation and building details; 6) provision of a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the subject site or portions of it were sold; 7) submission of a detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc.; 8) elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st Street; 9) the property zoned R-1 shall have no development pending the City being provided detailed geotechnical information regarding site and site plan or PUD approval; and 10) acknowledgement that current plans are for conceptual approval of a PPUD and do not vest in the applicant or assign any development rights on the subject parcel or property without recommendations of City staff and approval by Council of the geotechnical studies called for above. In addition, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's Responsible Official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance on October 21, 1985. The Committee determined, at that time, that their original determination was valid for the proposed revisions to the PUD site plan. The site was annexed into the City by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4095, enacted on November 25, 1987. On April 4, 1988, Council approved Honey Creek PPUD (PPUD-015-84) which became effective on May 9, 1988 (Ordinance No. 4143). That approval rezoned the site to R-1 and R-2 and allowed a maximum of 72 units on this site. It also required that there be two full access roads to the site, including a 40-foot wide right-of-way alignment between Harrington Avenue N.E. and the site. Because of a subsequent Superior Court decision issued on April 25, 1986 that barred the City from using eminent domain to acquire a full right-of-way on N.E. 23rd Street, the Council, on July 24, 1989, in response from a request from the applicant, passed a motion to amend its earlier requirement that the PUD provide full street improvements including a 40-foot wide public right-of- way alignment along N.E. 23rd Street. This amendment also asked the Public Works Department to review the adequacy of streets serving the southern exit from the site as well as safety issues on these streets. Public Works did carry out this review and came up with a list of street improvements for Jefferson Avenue N.E. and portions of Harrington Avenue N.E., including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, and undergrounding of utilities. The applicant, with this latest revision to their Preliminary PUD application, is now proposing to use N.E. 23rd Street only as a gated emergency access only. Although the City owns a 20 foot right- of-way along N.E. 23rd, it has agreed to require that only 18 feet of paved improvements be provided by the applicant since a neighboring property owner has apparently refused to give the applicant a temporary easement for constructing a retaining wall along a portion of the right-of- way. CIE SUES ThE' following issues have been raised about the revised Preliminary PUD application during the interim sin:e it was last heard by City Council. These issues are addressed below: 1.Whether the revised PPUD is sufficiently consistent with the previously considered PPUD so as not to require additional review by the Hearing Examiner? This is really not an issue since the Council is not being asked to consider the Final PUD at this time, but rather, revisions to a Preliminary PUD application pursuant to changes it requested of the applicant. Were Council approving a Final PUD, it would have to be in substantial compliance with the approved Preliminary PUD. 411. Planned Unit Development Sta Report Honey Creek Preliminary PUD May 29, 1990 Pa ge 3 2.Whether the revised PPUD adequately addresses City concerns for adequate emergency vehicle access? Both the Fire Department and Public Works Department have reviewed the applicant's proposed emergency vehicle access on N.E. 23rd Street and agreed to a minimum of 18 feet of paving in the City owned 20 foot wide right-of-way. 3.Whether the revised PPUD now meets road access requirements in terms of slope and roadway configuration to satisfy the concerns of the Public Works Department? The Public Works Department has reviewed the latest Preliminary PUD site plan with its revised roadway configuration including loop turnaround and revised exit road (formerly paralleling the southern boundary) now designated for emergency access only, because of its turns on steeper grades, and approved it in concept. 4.Whether the revised PPUD has been sited and engineered to ensure slope stability and erosion control? By siting more buildings away from the sloped areas and restricting their placement to those portions of the site with slopes of 10 percent or less, there is less likelihood (than under the former site plan) for slope instability to occur. The applicant will still be required to submit a detailed geotechnical report and analysis before construction will be allowed. 5.Whether the revised PPUD has been sited to preserve natural features such as trees on the site? Nearly 50 percent of the site is preserved in greenbelt. In addition, staff are recommending that additional landscaping be provided along steep slopes to further buffer them from erosion. Because of this, site is expected to maintain a park-like feeling. B. ISSUES: The following issues relate to possible environmental and/or site plan design related considerations arising as a consequence of this development. Since there has not been`'. subsequent environmental or site plan review on the project, the following discussion is an attempt to address some of these where appropriate. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 1.Whether the subject proposal adequately protects the natural environment and in particular, mature landscaping found on the site? A considerable amount of the site will be preserved in its natural state. However, a tree inventory needs to be prepared that will delineate which trees will be reserved and which will be removed. Whenever possible, efforts should be taken in the siting of residential buildings and parking areas to preserve larger specimen trees found on the site. NA-"URAL ENVIRONMENT 2.Whether adequate provisions have been made to stabilize slopes and minimize future erosion on the site? The applicant needs to develop a slope stability and conservation plan that is acceptable to the Public Works Department before they submit for Final PUD approval. This plan needs to be based upon a detailed geotechnical report prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer. LIGI-IT AND GLARE 3.Whether light and glare impacts have been mitigated for both on-site and off-site residents? A detailed landscaping plan, including fencing, paving and lighting, needs to be developed prior to the applicant submitting for Final PUD approval. This plan should ensure that there are low fence or shrubbery barriers that will block auto headlight glare for both residents and neighboring property owners. On site lighting should be shielded so as not to create visible glare from abutting properties. IP 4010 PI finned Unit Development Starr Report Homey Creek Preliminary PUD Maly 29, 1990 PE ge 4 TRAFFIC 4.Whether ingress and egress have been adequately worked out to ensure reasonable protection of nearby residents as well as users of the site? After considerable review, it now appears that vehicular ingress and egress have been worked out to the satisfaction of the City and the applicant. Whereas in 1986, the applicant was required to provide two separate means of access with full street improvements, this condition has now been changed to a requirement for only one "full" street access and an 18-foot wide emergency access road on N.E. 23rd Street. On July 24, 1989, Council asked the Public Works Department to review the adequacy of streets serving the southern exit from the site. Public Works reported back to Council with a list of improvements on Jefferson Avenue N.E. from the site to Harrington Avenue N.E. including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and lighting to City standards, underground utilities to an abutting duplex and fourplex, as well as a marked school crosswalk across Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E., and approximately 500 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E. to the parking lot entrance at Hillcrest School. The applicant will have to make these improvements to mitigate traffic impacts on the project. ST1)RM WATER 5.Whether surface water drainage has been adequately addressed so as to minimize impacts on soils stability and erosion? The applicant must develop a detailed storm water drainage and soils stabilization plan before submitting for Final PUD approval. Native vegetation buffers, for example, should be provided on steep slopes to help reduce the likelihood of slides. STORM WATER 6.Whether storm and surface waters are being treated so as to minimize impacts on water quality in Honey Creek, a waterway of statewide significance and designated fisheries enhancement stream? This plan must address how storm water is to be handled and treated before its release into Honey Creek. Presumably, on site retention and biofiltration as well as oil/water separation will occur before these waters are released into the creek. SLC)PE STABILITY 7.Whether the site has been laid out in such a way as to minimize impacts on steeper slopes and potential slides and erosion? The applicants have addressed this by restricting their development to those portions of the site having a mean average slope of 10 percent or less. RECREATION 8.Whether sufficient recreational facilities have been provided on-site or exist in the immediate area to adequately address the recreational needs of the future occupants of the proposed 72 dwelling units that would be developed on this site? North Highlands Park lies approximately 800 feet to the south of the site, immediately south of Highland Crest School. But more importantly, a relatively large portion of the site is being retained as open space. Approximately one acre of the 14.06 acre site could be considered usable open space. This, and the large amounts of steeper sloped greenbelt provide a relatively high ratio of passive open space for future residents. In addition, the City's Master Trails Plan calls for a pedestrian trail along Honey Creek at some future, undetermined date. An easement at the south end of the site connecting to this trail might also be highly desirable, benefiting the development as well as surrounding Planned Unit Development Stdul rieport Honey Creek Preliminary PUD May 29, 1990 F age 5 neighborhoods. Staff also note that the latest revisions delete a tot lot, cabana, swimming pool, and tennis court that were shown in the previous scheme. CONSTRUCTION 9.Whether plans have been developed to adequately address construction related impacts such as noise, traffic, erosion, and potential vandalism that could occur prior to the project being occupied? The applicant has not yet developed such a plan, but based upon our experience with Victoria Hills FPUD, staff highly recommend that the applicant develop such a plan or preferably negotiate a development agreement with the City covering construction related activities such as hours of the day and week that construction activities will be allowed, penalties for violations, a phasing schedule for completing different buildings, definitions of completion, etc. C RECOMMENDATIONS: After carefully reviewing the record and the revisions to the latest proposal Staff are recommending that the Cc uncil accept the latest revisions to the Preliminary PUD and approve this Preliminary PUD for 72 dwelling un is as delineated in the applicant's revised Preliminary PUD site plan dated 1-24-90 and received by the Cit j on March 7, 1990 subject to the following conditions: 1.The applicant shall submit a detailed tree inventory and landscaping and on-site improvements plan acceptable to the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD; 2.The applicant shall submit a detailed geotechnical study and slope stabilization plan acceptable to the Public Works Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD; 3.The applicant shall submit plans and bonds for all on and off site improvements stipulated by the Public Works Department, including those improvements identified in their memo of September 13, 1990 to the Council; 4.The applicant shall submit a detailed construction impact mitigation plan acceptable to the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD; and, 5.The applicant shall work with Community Development and Parks and Recreation Department staff to develop appropriate on-site recreation facilities for future residents prior to submittal of the Final PUD. I• 1:------ ------ .- u L.D k...IA I V I I 0 N 1 4. -:-,_ 0, Ct is'/, ' 1,„."/' ----;>0..•-pr-AvC., fliti--,/,..-"-........••••;2,- 41) UNITS:FLATS 40 UNITS TONIIIIQUSES ___)2.MI I n TOTAL 72 UNITS A . .., • 1 TOTAI.SITE AREA: 612,450 n.r. (14.06 ACRES) O./\-r Oa lig i AREA or DEDICATION: 70.7S0 S.F. 1'' t, ''' 8C 11111 ‘.K‘T..1 i i il A- NET SITE AREA: 532,700 S.F. (12.23 ACRES) NET SITE DENSITY: 5.09 UNITS/ACRE a •t,))//, PARK 1 NG REQUIRED: VA c ,. ..,. tiL. 72 UNITS x 1.5 ' 108 STALIS 1 ,/ , / /7--"-e-70\ . ' ‘ Alp. .ir ,.....„..,.....................„,r,/ GUEST PARKING 22,UN ITS__s__.j,5________)8_,TIA1,1-9 TOTAL 126 STALLS r,i N) PARKING PROVIDE)). 130 STALLS 44 jl.' .- , 1.14111 . , A/./-.441$11° 46 A . l(/'‘',. 7.1 ....... ....... 111 4 ...,. 4N.,...,........ ij.,\,' a • .. 11- .,,,.. ,11 I( 6%-20 EIJI COsEN GARAGES 7'/-„-- ,/40 A C.."FL.-4• Cr(ri 17 1tTATIST74f. r Irs' ... ,' ' : 4 14 i., ie _If , volte411 .. '`) II IP• do, Ih• 01. 111..‘_b....-„,• IIIM . . I 5 4.IF p 1§/ .'5 1411111. . - Au i r. i • • l'"..7..... i'''''''....--'..'- /''' 4 i A...., jjj, . .... j. i - i-,-,,. litil...q ‘44 , 41;)II L I P- t6 I 4 I o k illP -, •• ' ort WI ell i -/. :T1:'<.,- " ,,- * IOW - T.: 3-- * A T4' .-,. -Ilia • iii" ,...... .....114", 74'2...%.,/::_7,•:.,1...,it 4 . s. •f.:z-c,•vik1-'' 4. - 1' 4 10 . ' f -.) 1 , It tr , MB Th • • . ›, , 104010;7 _i. „4:60..„-:,,,,,., , . e2,‘ ,...; 11.._ i__ . . .,..,... • . 714%.. 4.' ,‘,.‘:;\,,,,,‘ . -,,: V,,., . _..„,2 . ' I:// 1. /....-..--- 7.'///,, . • /, r` ' 1 1 ff; IS' '1.,‘'.1• - N.. 1.•••• 111111.4'. 1.•-g 1. i'• N1'....sill.:.: • (( 1 ZIShalb • 9.1 4r , i. ... .1., . 77, s . r • ya . -. - 74. Ili A 1 lb , 714 '1. . i _ I-: y. I, 1 f, 4 1 ,i j---------/ r-}/ 4, 5----- ----' .f(-7 k. . 4 . '' .''' r : •-/----- 7 ., :-., , ___,,:_____...._.....__:,„__ r '''' .7•-• -. ......1111r__27:177. ' J '''. 9t-i-11.''..._:: • r i . 1.: _. ___ 40.!:::_.. . ... s,,.... : ..._ • • ,.. . a..7.6aifit: w .. • -1 .7.•..- . 4EF-_ S N c..) „- i_.-• '7 ......... lip ,...11 -,:-._.---- - 0:v./..„....__ -- -----:-_ AVE. NE.ei 1------ 1 - 1...-:'• ' 1 r..:---•-..• ---- • .' ..-0)-4------•1"--- Air - 4 7.1D ir, 111FIr - 1 ( 4.. . ' ' 'r-------- 711113141 y Et-leta. E-1,-ICY ' i J 1 Iwo, I1C.C,M ikqo 0o t ' 7O t4 oo• 5/' a 46,1.60' 4 In 1)4'4 M CI . tNI U.I SITE 1 i Z 6 18CT v." '' 4 tq.. ga WW1 n' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL APPLICANT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES/ SKIP JACOBSON FILE NO.: PPUD-15-84 Vicinity of the 2200 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a revised preliminary PUD application for a multiple-family development with 72 dwelling units on 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek. The following report incorporates the Findings and Conclusions of the original report of the Hearing Examiner issued on March 4, 1985, which was later revised in the Hearing Examiner's report of January 17, 1986. Changes in some of the findings reflect the modified site plan for the P.U.D. FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Skip Jacobson, requests approval of a revision to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development (P.P.U.D) application for the Honey Creek P.U.D. The Honey Creek P.U.D. proposal consists of 72 dwelling units on approximately 14.06 acres of property. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, the previous decisions by the Hearing Examiner, and a revised site plan together with a remand and other pertinent documentation are a part of the record for the application. In addition, documentation includes decisions regarding on-site access. 3. The City Council, on April 14, 1986, adopted the recommendations of the Planning and Development Committee, approving the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner, as amended, to rezone the PUD site subject to: 1) submission of a final PUD; 2) annexation of the site into the City; 3) dedication of a full 40-foot right-of-way on N.E. 23rd; 4) submission with a final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis; 5) submission of detailed plans for the final PUD showing usable open space, recreation and building details; 6) provision of a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the subject site or portions of it were sold; 7) submission of a detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc.; 8) elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st Street; 9) the property zoned R-1 shall have no development pending the City being provided detailed geotechnical information regarding site and site plan or PUD approval; and, 10) acknowledgement that current plans are for conceptual approval of a PPUD and do not vest in the applicant or assign any development rights on the subject parcel or property without recommendations of City staff and approval by Council of the geotechnical studies called for above. 4. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's Responsible Official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance on October 21, 1985. The Committee reviewed the revised request on October 16, 1985 and determined that the original determination is valid for the proposed revisions to the P.U.D. site plan. 5. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter on or between April 24, 1984 and October 10, 1985 and in succeeding years as needed to resolve issues. 6. The subject site is located in the vicinity of 2200 Jefferson Avenue N.E., immediately south and generally east of 120th Place S.E., more commonly known as Devil's Elbow. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4095, enacted on November 25, 1987. 8. The subject site is a portion of a 47.7 acre site rezoned by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4141, enacted on March 24, 1988. The subject parcel received an R-2, Residential zoning classification which is a low density multiple-family zone allowing 12.1 dwelling units per acre. S 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as being suitable for the development of greenbelt and low density multiple-family uses, but does not allow such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The configuration of the existing site was created through a lot line adjustment in King County approved in 1986. 11. A steep ravine is located adjacent to the property line running diagonally from the northernmost point of the property to the southeast corner of the site. Honey Creek is located at the bottom of this steep ravine. 12. Access to the subject site is limited due to the complex topography of the subject parcel and adjacent parcel to the northeast and east, and given the existing development pattern in the general area. Development surrounding the subject site is mixed. To the north and immediately north/northeast and east are undeveloped parcels of property which includes the majority of the ravine area and Honey Creek. To the east are single-family uses, generally clustered in single-family subdivisions. The property south of the site is developed with senior housing and duplex housing complexes developed during World War II. Finally, to the west, development consists of single-family residences. 13. The site, at one time, was part of an old quarry. The relatively level plateau, on which the development is proposed, is the result of the quarry activity. An old road grade was cut into the site from Devil's Elbow to approximately the area of the subject site. 14. Sewer service will be available to the site via hookup to the Honey Creek interceptor sewer which runs through the bottom of the adjacent ravine. 15 Storm drainage from the site will flow into Honey Creek, a fish spawning stream. Because of this, biofiltration of surface water runoff should occur before storm drainage discharges into this stream. 16. Water lines will need to be extended from Harrington Avenue N.E. to serve the site. 17. Considerable discussion has taken place over the years on the issue of access to the site. The public opposition to the development has focussed mostly upon site access, the inadequacy of the adjacent roads, and the impacts of traffic at these access points upon the adjacent single-family neighborhood. Both N.E. 21st Street and N.E. 23rd Street were found to be substandard streets, for example. The now proposed access road off of Jefferson Avenue N.E. will have grades of 10% to 15%. Devil's Elbow was dropped from consideration because of its grades as well as the fact that it had experienced continued instability. The Public Works Department has determined that Devil's Elbow is "not safe for either primary access or emergency access." 18. In March 1985, the original PPUD application for this site was denied by the Hearing Examiner based upon inaccurate density calculations. At that time, primary access was from Jefferson Avenue N.E., with a second access on N.E. 21st Street. A 20-foot wide, gated emergency access road was provided along N.E. 23rd Street. Following resubmittal in January 1986, the Hearing Examiner recommended the elimination of the second access on N.E. 21st Street and also required that the applicant bear the cost of upgrading these access roads. 19. With the elimination of the N.E. 21st Street access and the shifting of access to the south, the Council required, at its meeting on April 14, 1986, the "...dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of-way alignment with N.E. 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue N.E. and the site, with an engineering report and specifications for full street improvement as required by City Code." Because of subsequent difficulties in acquiring the necessary right-of-way, the applicants, Honey Creek Associates, asked the City in September, 1986 to assist them by starting condemnation proceedings (at the owners expense) against the owners of the adjacent properties. 20. On April 4, 1988, Council approved Honey Creek PPUD (PPUD-015-84) which became effective May 9, 1988 (Ordinance No. 4143). 21. In June of 1988, neighbors near the site supported the proposed Honey Creek PUD development as an improvement that would "discourage crime, dumping, and motorcycle access in the area." 22. After the City began condemnation proceedings, this matter was later appealed to the courts by one of the property owners whose property was being condemned. A Superior Court decision issued on April 25, 1986 barred the City from using eminent domain to acquire a full right-of-way on N.E. 23rd Street (it was felt that the City was using its powers to primarily benefit a private applicant). 2- 23. At another public hearing on the PPUD on June 19, 1989, the Council was asked to decide whether to retain the approved PPUD requirement of two full access roads to the site or to reduce the requirement to one access road along N.E. Jefferson with a twenty foot, gated emergency access road on N.E. 23rd Street. The Council decided not to take action on this date. 24. At a subsequent meeting on July 24, 1989, the Council, in response to a request from the applicant, passed a motion to amend the PPUD to eliminate its earlier requirement that the applicant provide full street improvements including a 40-foot wide public right-of-way alignment along N.E. 23rd Street. Instead, Council called for the road to be improved only for emergency vehicle access using the twenty (20) feet of right-of- way that the City owns on N.E. 23rd Street. That motion also asked the Public Works Department to review the adequacy of streets serving the southern exit from the site as well as look at safety issues on these streets and report back to Council. Staff determined that these streets were designed for local access as defined in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The size, construction and maintenance plans for these streets also indicates local access status. Neighborhood collectors per the Subdivision Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan are to be 60 feet - paved for 36 feet. 25. The traffic analysis prepared for the subject proposal predicted 60% of the PPUD development's traffic will travel south from the project site toward Kirkland Avenue N.E. The remainder of the traffic from this area of the site would travel north and west of the site. 26. Under the previous (1985) site plan, which had its primary access from N.E. 21st Street as well as Jefferson, residents along these streets were concerned that ingress and egress and subsequent improvements along these streets would open up an even more direct route through a residential neighborhood. This concern has been reduced under the latest site plan (drawing dated 1-24-90, see Exhibit "A") which limits primary access to Jefferson Avenue N.E. Traffic leaving the development heading north under the revised proposal would now have to exit via Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. south to N.E. 16th Street, and then go north on Edmonds Avenue N.E. to destinations to the north. Traffic traveling southward would likely travel the same route, but continue south on Edmonds Avenue N.E. 27. In June of 1989, Public Works evaluated whether N.E. 21st should be evaluated as an alternative to N.E. 23rd Street. They concluded there was: 1) insufficient right-of-way; and 2) traffic will pass through a single-family residential area. 28. On September 13, 1989, the Public Works Department reported back to the Council on improvements it felt were necessary to ensure pedestrian safety due to increased traffic generated by the subject proposal on September 25, 1989. This report was subsequently referred back to the Planning and Development Committee for their consideration. 29. The Planning and Development Committee held several meetings to study this matter. On December 11, 1989, the Planning and Development Committee recommended, and the Council approved, the following street improvement conditions: a.The developer will improve the road on its project to city standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. It is anticipated that the road will be dedicated to the city. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of the street. b.The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E., as follows: 1.Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. 2.Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E. which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. c.The developer will install the following school safety improvements: 1.A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E. with appropriate signing should be required. 3- 2.Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E., south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. 30. Pursuant to this action, the applicant has proposed to use N.E. 23rd street as a gated emergency access. Although the City owns 20 feet of right-of-way on the extension of N.E. 23rd Street, not all of this can be used for improved roadway since a retaining wall has to be built along a portion of it. The Fire Department, on March 21, 1990, indicated that there is sufficient right-of-way to build the emergency access provided that the width of the paved portion of the right-of-way is not less than 18 feet wide. The applicants submitted revised plans on March 7, 1990 showing that this requirement could be met. Further, the applicant retained Terra Associates, Inc. to evaluate the adequacy of the proposed concrete retaining walls on either side of the roadway. The engineers determined that the design shown for the roadway improvements could be accomplished. 31. Density calculations which were based upon the PUD formula were originally a subject of dispute. With the revised PPUD plans, this issue is essentially resolved. The only potential area for dispute in the current case might be over the choice of contour intervals used in calculating steep slopes and the subsequent densities allowed. The Building and Zoning Department (now part of the Community Development Department) had primary jurisdiction for determining the density. It appears the Department made a reasonable determination of the density in 1985. In addition, its decision was not disputed at the time. 32. The total number of units, barring slope, street and dedication deductions which could be accommodated on those portions of the site for which the applicant has requested R1 zoning would be 48.36, while 72 units could be accommodated on that portion of the site zoned R2, for a total of 120.36 units on the original 14.06 acre portion of the site currently under consideration. Dedications would reduce the acreage by approximately 0.85 acres or 5.1 units, and street set asides would reduce the acreage by 1.6 acres or 9.6 units. The slope formula used by the City staff, deducting the most acreage due to severe slope, would reduce the development potential by 31.9% or 33.71 units. The total would permit 71.95 units which was just .05 units below the applicant's request of 72 units. 33. The potential 72 units are planned only for that portion of the site lying to the south and west of Honey Creek. No proposal has been submitted for the area to the east or north of Honey Creek. 34. No population projections or school age student projections were made for the subject proposal by staff in 1985. Using current standards, we would estimate that the 72 units of multi-family townhouses and flats would generate approximately 29 school age children. This compares to an estimated 26 school age children if the site were developed with an estimated 43 single-family homes. 35. The project, with its 72 units, would generate an estimated 430 vehicle trips per day. Comparisons were drawn indicating that the development of approximately 43 single- family homes (under single-family zoning on this site) would generate, at 10.0 AWDTE per dwelling unit a similar amount of traffic as 72 units at 6.5 AWDTE per dwelling unit (468 vehicle trips per day). 36. The majority of soils found on the site are sandy soils of Class III. Such soils typically imply that such a site would be susceptible to erosion, earthquake and landslide damage. Slides occurred while the sewer line was being installed in the creek bed, and other slides and sloughs have occurred in the past along the steep walls above Honey Creek, both on and off the subject site. The applicant has addressed this by restricting their development to those portions of the site having a mean average slope of less than 10 percent. In addition, the use of native vegetation buffers on steep slopes should be provided to further reduce the likelihood of slides. CONCLUSIONS 1. The development of the subject site using the PUD provisions of the Building Regulations would appear to be in the public interest. The unique topography and environment of the subject site can best be protected by clustering new development on those portions of the site that are less prone to erosion or landslide damage and staying away from areas having steeper slopes such as along Honey Creek. The 1982 PUD provisions allow such density clustering when it is in the public interest. The proposed 4- 72 multi-family units would not produce substantially more traffic than a 43 unit single- family residential development (permitted under the current zoning). The PUD appears to present a reasonable method of developing an environmentally sensitive site, permits the applicant reasonable use of the site (which is private property) and appears to protect the site's fragile environment better than most other uses except possibly a park or open space use. The latter, however, would do little to police the site and reduce unauthorized use of the site by those dumping litter, shooting off firecrackers, and driving motorcycles across it. 2. The topographical isolation of the site would also appear sufficient to avoid any adverse impacts from incompatible housing types or densities on adjoining properties. Whereas under the 1985 site plan, buildings in the southwest corner of the site were within 90 feet of the western and southern property lines. Under the latest 1990 site plan, there is at least a 190 foot separation from the nearest residential building to the southern or western property lines. The housing under this latest site plan would be clustered and encircle the level westerly plateau, which would be left for open space purposes. 3. Multi-family dwelling units at this location would allow for more variety and diversity in the existing neighborhood and allow more housing choices for those who wish to reside in this part of the City, be they existing or new residents. At this stage, the applicant has not provided a definitive plan for the different multi-family housing types being proposed. Only a schematic proposal, as is required for Preliminary PUDs, has been submitted at this time. A breakdown as to unit size, type and number of bedrooms should be provided for all units and buildings in the PUD. 4. The issue of slope stability has not yet been adequately addressed. While the site seems suitable from a land use perspective for a PUD of 72 units, the geological underpinnings of the site need to be more fully explored. With the submission of the Final PUD, the applicant will have to present a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Department of Community Development and the Public Works Departments. The report shall include, but not be limited to, information regarding: site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their current state; long term implications of development on slope stability; geologic hazard including earthquake analysis; plans for site preparation and restoration, as well as building construction techniques that will minimize ground instability and/or subsidence due to settling or erosion. The applicant should be required to provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is ever sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowners/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. 5. The access concerns of residents remain even with the scaling down of the proposal from 120 units to 72 units. It is not just the increased population of the subject proposal, but the creation of a new defacto "through" street - connection along Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. to N.E. 16th Street which raises concerns about safety to nearby residents and school age children. The streets surrounding the subject site to the south were not designed as collector streets, and in their current state should not be utilized as such. Even with the upgrading of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. with width improvements, property acquisition and surface upgrading, the proposed access to the site may still pose problems to nearby residents. For example, these streets were not originally designed to carry through traffic, and homes along these streets are located closer to the street than would normally be the case along collector streets. 6. The applicant's latest proposal, using Jefferson Avenue N.E. for primary access and N.E. 23rd Street as a gated emergency approach to the site, makes sense now that the City's Fire Marshal has agreed to accept a roadway width of less than 20 feet. Many other complexes, such as Cedar Ridge and Woodcliffe, have one primary entry with an emergency access which is gated, and some, such as Forest Brook, only have one entry point. With the elimination of secondary access and the changing of N.E. 23rd Street into emergency access only, there no longer is a need to keep the previously proposed secondary access along N.E. 21st Street. 7. The site plan for the Preliminary PUD now appears reasonable and should be approved. NOTE: Plans for the Final PUD would have to follow the layout shown in the Preliminary PUD but also be more detailed and show the requisite open space, recreation areas, and building design details.) 5- 10 RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the proposed preliminary P.U.D., File PPUD-015-84, be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a detailed geotechnical report with the submission of the final PUD application. The report shall address site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their existing state; analyze the long term erosion potential by the development; identify geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; provide specifics on site preparation and restoration; and identify appropriate building techniques for the site. 2. Construct and maintain gated secondary emergency access along the right-of-way of N.E. 23rd Street which shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall and Public Works Director, with a minimum width of 18 feet of paving. 3. The applicant shall provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. In addition, the applicant shall record covenants running with the land requiring that the slope on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as closely as is possible in its natural state. 4. The applicant shall improve the road on its project to City standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. The roadway shall be dedicated to the City. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of the street. 5. The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E., as follows: 1.Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. 2.Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E. which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. 6. The developer will install the following school safety improvements: a.A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E., with appropriate signing, should be required. b.Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E., south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. 7. The submittal of detailed plans for the final PUD, providing a description of the usable open space, recreation and building details. 8. The final PUD shall comply with relevant City site plan review criteria (contained in Section 4-31-33 of the City Code) as they pertain to: separation of pedestrian and vehicular circulation; privacy within and between units; preservation of views and natural features; siting of carports and/or garages; treatment of exterior building surfaces for aesthetic and durability reasons; lighting; signage; and landscaping. 9. And, compliance with all existing and any subsequent mitigation conditions imposed by the City's responsible SEPA official, the Environmental Review Committee. 6- cnl-f IN T 'C i CITY OF RENTON mil • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Earl Clymer, Mayor Fire Marshal: Glen G. Gordon Chief: A. Lee Wheeler MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1990 TO: Donald Erickson - Zoning Administrator FROM: Glen G. Gordon - Fire Marshal ?;:• SUBJECT:Honeycreek Fire Department Access Road Off Of Northeast 23rd Street Don: I reviewed the revised proposal for Fire Department access off of Northeast 23rd Street. The revised proposal showing the 18 foot access road into the site off of Northeast 23rd is approved. Any further questions, please let me know. GGG:mbt 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2642 S CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM r(' l JUN 19 1989 IIj t, DATE : June 16, 1989 TO: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney FROM : Lynn A. G trr ar4, Public Works Director SUBJECT: NE 23rd Street and Honey Creek PUD This memo is in response to your correspondence dated May 1 , 1989, in regard to street access to the proposed Honey Creek PUD. Question 1 : Should the City acquire the NE 23rd Street right-of-way, even if the Honey Creek Associates PUD is not developed? RespDnse: The answer is yes. This roadway section will be needed for whoever and whenever the subject property is developed. NE 23rd Street provides the most direct route and least disruptive route through the single family residence. This street access would also disperse the traffic impact at Jefferson Ave. NE access which routes passed Hillcrest Elementary School . A lesser traffic impact around a school location should be encouraged. Question 2: If NE 23rd Street cannot be used, what other alternative means of access to the property should be used? Resp )nse: If NE 23rd Street is not an option, then the less desirable alter- natives would be as follows: Alternate #1 : NE 21st Street between Jefferson Ave. NE & Harrington Place This roadway segment has an insufficient right-a-way problem. The easterly 130 feet has a 30-foot right-a-way and the westerly 125 feet of this roadway segment has a 60-foot right-of-way. The easterly half needs another 30 feet of right-a-way to match the westerly half. It is also needed to build to a roadway width that meets current standards. Another problem with NE 21st Street is that it passes through a single family residence creating increased traffic in a residential area neighborhood. Alternate #2: NE 27th Street & 120th Place SE also known as the Devil 's Elbow) This roadway, as you are aware, has been closed due to its instability. In its present condition, it is unacceptable for Lawrence J. Warren Page 2 June 16, 1989 primary and/or secondary emergency access. Based upon prelimi - nary investigation, it was estimated in 1988 by staff that it would cost $1,432,000 to construct a 28-foot wide roadway meeting current standards. The cost makes this option non- viable. The minimum right-of-way width required per ordinance is 50 feet for any of the alternatives above. An exception is 40 feet for one-way traffic on a hillside area. See City Code 9-1108 Section 7H. Question 3: What long-term planning and traffic problems does this PUD create for the City? Respcnse: Phase I of the proposed PUD is 77 units which impact the accesses proposed above. This will generate an average weekday traffic of 508 vehicle trips per day with 40 trips in the AM peak and 49 trips in the PM peak hour. Phase II will not use this proposed access, but access to the east. The PUD will not cause a major impact on the existing roadways if we can disperse the access at two locations. If we can provide further information, please let us know. CEM:ad Attachments CEM113 9rr r u ell CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Earl Clymer, Mayor Fire Marshal: Glen G. Gordon Chief: A. Lee Wheeler June 7, 1989 Honorable Earl Clymer City Council Members Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: Honeycreek P.U.D. Dear Mayor Clymer and Renton City Council Members: I have been contacted by City Attorney Larry Warren regarding the pending hearing and possible approval of the Honeycreek P.U.D. The following information will answer the questions posed in Larry Warren's memorandum pertaining to fire department emergency access from Northeast 23rd Street: 1.Question: Is the existing city right-of-way sufficient to build an emergency access? Answer: I made an inspection of the proposed site on June 7, 1989. It appears the existing right-of-way is sufficient to construct a fire department emergency access into the site. 2.Question: If not, because of retaining walls or other reasons, how much right-of-way will be necessary? Answer: During my inspection I did not see any retaining walls, however, one may be required to be constructed in the future, to properly develop the access. 3.Question: What type of surface will be required to handle the emergency vehicles? Answer: The Uniform Fire Code requires a 20 foot minimum width of road surface. City of Renton Fire Lane Ordinance #4130, specifies a paved concrete or asphalt surface to support a 41,000 lb. fire apparatus. The Renton Fire Department will enforce these codes and ordinances. 4.Question: What other problems can you anticipate with this particular emergency access? Answer: At this time I don't anticipate any problems, with the possible exception of grade; maximum approved fire department grade is 12%. I hope I have answered your concerns. Sinc eteely, iJZ GLEN G. GORDON Fire Marshal GGG:mbt pc: Larry Warren Lynn Guttmann 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2642 6 CHil'llT "F C2 ( OINAL P°P U1:7 aRtrorCiA t NG.•...= ilICINITY MAP I as 1 1 k.) i t___.: 10.' . Ig ii WI. ii I r(-2'woril_f___=_:- tu•or 7IIif lt,A\ lam - o t L. 1" \i( ( ' li ( 1__ i...._ 40* ii....v.h. I N I fs pr..nb.lt IAN\ 11 \I Fury DEVELOMEKr AF s-t N tl.YM i•M Q\\\ \ 8d,0,.. IMI I...uNITS i K 7) P:: 17TH 1$*^ N‘1 L Nn 4 S 0\A\ 4\ \ Th-\ \ 1 \ \\ ikr \ r\)\ r 4 NW41We1.)\ tAirit, n 0 j 71 ;1 )0 P1/4\431 \ \ ' ' 1§VN,, i'‘ 7--'-. Th r/ 3 ZI \ 1 .i ill inittI: . Val /1 \ _ '.. i -- \\\ ‘ 4\0( ( /r111ija.*" 7—.--- t\ f 1 11 : t1I1 ' wArkisex -- , - i A\O\1 1. \II rk;‘,4-1.41.-141\‘\ .,'k\ 11 \\\\ V . I/ c , L .1 ' s.- ti,%--_ *_(!"144-14-kk,41tht ___ .4 riIli05] iggif,40141/4 „\ :i ik, \a .:,0*.t. X‘ .,LI ' 143 - s- ' - 17.:40410\ s ,, i ,- ;!- Aftiv Aiiit "0 00( „__ 404m------ -______-,-___I-, \\\ \o\ ,Iii li k*- r" AN& ttzili—.---- ate- 1 gi(— ' 4it ' V' k'l)- - ) Ill ( U\ k :\*T- --- JEFFERON ii Ni... S zl.tlnp R-2 zon• 77 o , o i R A M— ' ° /t ®E R i LED)_EA(FiliEj : Li -11—.__-1V o z June 4, 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 163 PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published PUD: Preliminary, Honey in accordance with local and State law, Mayor Clymer opened the public Creek. PPUD-015-84 hearing to consider the Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development. The subject site is 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue Northeast. Larry Springer, Planning Manager for the Community Development Department, presented a chronology of the project which began in late 1984. Mr. Springer reported that the Planning and Development Committee had directed staff to prepare a report and recommendation for final action on the project. Staff presented three options: (1) reject the redesigned emergency access only proposal for NE 23rd and thereby deny the proposed Honey Creek PPUD; (2) approve the redesigned emergency access only proposal for NE 23rd and thereby approve the proposed Honey Creek PPUD, and refer the matter to Ways and Means for action; (3) accept the staff recommendation for revised access to the project, and thereby approve the proposed Honey Creek PPUD including: emergency access only for NE 23rd Street;, emergency access only for the road along the south side of the project; relocate three buildings northward onto the lower part of the site adjacent to the other units. The matter would then be referred to Ways and Means for preparation of an ordinance and set June 18th as a public hearing date where Council can hear testimony on topics other than the access. Upon Council inquiry regarding the revisions and removal of landscape materials, Don Erickson, responded that a considerable amount will be preserved in its natural state. Mr. Erickson noted that there was a cooperative effort with staff, the developer, and other departments in making the revisions to the original plan. Council President Mathews asked if current code and PPUD requirements were being applied to this project since it was originally started in 1983-84 and has not received approval. Mr. Springer referred to City Code Title 4, Chapter 15, Sections 11, 12, 13 regarding timelines on planned unit developments and noted that the new code should be added as an amendment to the recommendations offered by staff in the report submitted to Council prior to final of the project. He noted that the letters from the Fire Marshall and Public Works Department had been received concurring that the redesigned emergency access meets the requirements presented to the Planning and Development Committee in December 1989. Council asked for clarification regarding the subject for discussion pertaining to the PPUD. Staff verified that the public notice specifically stated that the public hearing was on the access of the Honey Creek project. Council President Mathews reiterated that the access issue is the only type of testimony to be heard before Council at this time. Comment from the audience was invited. Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, stated his opposition to the redesigned access. Mr. Murray noted concerns regarding the allowance of less than 20 foot width for the proposed emergency access; no allowance for gravel or drainage material; no guardrails along the road; the right of way below minimum standards. He recommended Devil's Elbow as the alternative for access which could be stabilized and also serve as a bike corridor and access to the sewer pump station at the base of the area. He requested that the revised access be denied because it is inappropriate to take action without a review by the hearing examiner as an independent analysis to clarify whether it meets code and allow public to have input. Virginia Hiramatsu, 2805 NE 23rd Place, Renton, stated that she is not opposed to the development itself but believes that the public would be better served with the plans as presented by Mr. Murray. Howard Coupman, 2809 NE 23rd Place, Renton, reiterated points made by Mr. Murray regarding Devil's Elbow as an possible alternative and stated his opposition to the current redesign. John Sargent, 2016 Edmonds Avenue NE, Renton, property owner next to the subject site stated that he felt there should be more negotiations. He expressed concerns regarding the need for retaining walls due to the unstable ground along the creek bed and the necessity for a wider emergency access road. Henry Jacobson, 13701 SE Allen Road, Bellevue, representing Honey Creek Associates, addressed the 18 foot access. He noted that the emergency access through the main entrance is a full 20 feet wide, and is an extension of a June 4, 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 164 City street that would be on Harrington. It is a full City-wide street that has lights and sidewalks. It is designed to be safety conscious and has good visibility. He also noted that there are three different accesses to the development, and he has spent many hours working with the City to achieve beneficial results. He stated that he disagrees with the Devil's Elbow alternative presented by Mr. Murray. Bob Tomberg, 5611 - 119th SE, Bellevue, owner of the subject property, stated that he has worked on this project for six years; it has not been a rapid decision. There has been a lot of negotiation on both sides and he believes this is a good compromise for all concerned. He reiterated that Devil's Elbow is not a viable alternative for this project which is the opinion of experts from the City and County and other professionals. In his opinion, the emergency access on 23rd is not necessary but provided as an extra benefit to the development. He stated that the project as recommended by staff meets all the requirements. John Best, 3337 - 259th Place, Issaquah, representative of Burnside Construction Company, who is purchasing the property to develop, noted that his company has a long history in development of quality neighborhoods. He stressed that the access as shown, especially the primary access, is adequate in and of itself in providing alternative emergency access. He stated that he is a 6 developer who has had a long track record with successful projects on the east side. Randy Corman, 2216 Harrington Place NE, Renton, stated that after reviewing the staff recommendations to City Council, he disagreed with the report regarding the traffic route. He referred to Item 25 and 26 regarding the traffic flow through the neighborhood stating that this route through a single family neighborhood would be heavily impacted and recommended that further study be done on street improvements in the neighborhood or scaling down on the proposed number of units. Further Council discussion followed regarding the number of chained fences for emergency access within the City and the number of times these accesses have been used in emergency situations. Glen Gordon, Fire Battalion Chief, responded that the City has approximately 15 chained emergency accesses and in 20 years, these have been seldom used. Councilman Edwards asked why the NE 23rd emergency access is necessary when there is a southerly access. Mr. Gordon explained that the road splits inside the development and if the south road is blocked, emergency vehicles cannot access the development. Therefore, there should be two separate accesses to the development. Councilwoman Zimmerman asked whether approval of the access as presented would give approval of the site plan. Mr. Springer explained that if the emergency access on 23rd is approved, that means the PPUD is approved as shown and then the final PUD could be started. Another public hearing could be held to discuss other items including relocation of buildings and modification of the site plan. Upon Council inquiry as to the redesign of the site plan, Mr. Springer answered that it was the result of combined efforts of the Planning and Development Committee and Mr. Jacobson, the potential purchaser of the PUD. Mr. Jacobsen redesigned the project and resubmitted it with the changes of the relocation of the three buildings. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON ALL ACCESSES INCLUDING THE EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE PPUD. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THE PPUD TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE AND SET PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 18, 1990 TO DISCUSS THE RELOCATION OF THREE UNITS INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS AS STATED IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PAGE 5, ITEM C, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL PAGE 6 WITH AMENDMENT TO #8 TO INCLUDE THE NEW PUD REQUIREMENTS PER CITY CODE TITLE 4, CHAPTER 15, SECTIONS 11, 12, AND 13.* June 4. 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 165 Councilwoman Zimmerman requested that the traffic impact to the duplex neighborhood in the adjacent area on Harrington Avenue NE be addressed and studied. Further Council inquiry regarding improvements to roads and sidewalks and school safety in the area of Harrington NE and Jefferson was answered by Mr. Springer who reported that the Public Works Department has studied the areas of concern and recommended certain safety improvements be completed by the developer. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, requested Council advance to Old Advancement Requested Business to discuss the North Soos Creek Annexation. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, NORTH SOOS CREEK ANNEXATION. CARRIED. Annexation: North Soos Ken Nyberg, Director of Community Development Department, introduced Creek (Fairwood) Nancy Laswell Morris, Chief, Long-Range Planning, and Fred Fortine, Senior Planner, who presented a report on the relation of the Growth Management program to the North Soos Creek project and the pros and cons of the North Soos Creek Annexation for taxpayers in Renton. Referring to a map which showed sphere of influence, potential annexation boundaries and areas where city services are provided, Ms. Laswell Morris explained the current way planning is done in the city through an inter- jurisdictional planning puzzle between the city and county which includes transportation, land use, housing, utilities, and capital facilities. She reported that the Growth Management Bill mandates five major elements in growth management planning which are land use, housing, capital facilities plan municipal land uses such as parks, etc), utilities and transportation. She stated that growth management mandates a balanced approach as compared to an isolated plan for the City. Ms. Laswell Morris explained a balanced system under the growth management which incorporates the five elements in relation to needs and the infrastructure capacity. Under this plan, the City becomes the focus with a series of four sectors radiating from the City, thus the North Soos Creek area becomes much more related to the City of Renton relative to planning. She further explained that under growth management, primary goals are an urban/rural boundary; concurrency, which is finance as you go with a focus on transportation; consistency between jurisdictions; a mandatory allocation of population growth in which the State will assign populations to the jurisdictions; and allocation of municipal land uses. Ms. Laswell Morris noted that according to the growth management act, the City would be required to analyze the North Soos Creek area because it would be within the City's eastern urban growth boundary, with the possibility of a southern boundary between Renton and Kent. Also, there would be an infrastructure analysis of expansion of City services such as transportation, water, sewer, storm water; and an analysis of municipal land uses such as library, fire, police, parks, and public works. Because of the annexation study by the City, certain elements of growth management have already been studied which include land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities and transportation. Ms. Laswell Morris presented the pros and cons in the areas of political influence, financial impact, land use, and municipal services. She then explained the general overview of the work program from June 1990 to November 1991 which included an immediate work program from June to October 1990 of public information, fact cards, public workshops and statistically valid surveys of both Renton residents and NSC residents. She presented the administration's recommendation to go forward with the work program and bring back to Council in October 1990 a go/no go decision based on facts, surveys of both groups, workshops and other community input. She explained that if the Council decides to go forward, then boundaries would have to be set for all, a portion, or larger than the initial study. In this particular time frame, an election in November 1991 would determine the annexation issue with an effective date of annexation on January 1, 1992. The reason for the November election is due to the timing of the work program, fiscal considerations and the cost of the election. CHRONOLOGY Honey Creek PPUD March, 1985 Hearing Examiner denied the original PPUD based on an inaccurate density calculation. January, 1986 Hearing Examiner recommends approval of a 72 unit PPUD having primary access off of Jefferson Avenue NE, and emergency access only off of 20 foot wide ROW at NE 23rd Street. April and May, 1986 Council generally concurs with Hearing Examiner's recommendation, but requires that the secondary access at NE 23rd Street be on a full 40 wide public ROW with full City standard improvements. September, 1986 Honey Creek Associates requests City assistance in acquiring additional ROW to comply with the condition to widen NE 23rd Street. October, 1987 City agrees to proceed with condemnation for 20 feet of NE 23rd Street ROW, but notifies the developers that it will be at their expense. April, 1988 A King County Superior Court decision prohibits the City from using eminent domain to acquire ROW to primarily benefit a private applicant. July, 1989 Applicant requests that Council reconsider its requirement that NE 23rd Street be upgraded to a full 40 foot wide street. Council concurs, but requests information from Public Works regarding impacts on Jefferson Ave NE, and from Fire Department regarding the adequacy of a 20 foot wide ROW for emergency access only along NE 23rd Street. December, 1989 Planning and Development Committee accepted staff reports regarding access, and some potential modifications to the site plan. The Committee directed staff to prepare a report and recommendation for final action at Council public hearing. COUNCIL OPTIONS Honey Creek PPUD o Reject the redesigned emergency access only proposal for NE 23rd and thereby DENY the proposed Honey Creek PPUD. o Approve the redesigned emergency access only proposal for NE 23rd and thereby APPROVE the proposed Honey Creek PPUD. Refer the matter to Ways and Means for preparation of an ordinance. o Accept the staff recommendation for revised access to the project, and thereby APPROVE the proposed Honey Creek PPUD including: emergency access only for NE 23rd Street emergency access only for the road along the south side of the project relocate buildings H, I, and J northward onto the lower part of the site adjacent to the other units Refer the matter to Ways and Means for preparation of an ordinance, and set June 18th as a public hearing date, where Council can accept testimony on topics other than access. 23P40 P\\/ENUE NE,-XI'TINC I-0II -K HT-of-W 18-cY rJFZI/t= nli II 1i 111 u1In nInInInI1 nH WOCwn Y I F ASIDE OF OFI\JE. 31 IIF`-111IuffnF1 11= A ilfj_ul j 111-:- 1 1^ 1)O 1 I1'1 or oI t1&1d i a'v !- Ifi<i Is Y col L.,11 10 v=r A - A: section at n.e. 23rd street A emergency access road I II ' 7— N.E. 23RD PL. 17 ..I r----- I 1 1 EXISTING ASPHALT— V 1 6 N• v WITH CURD. I:>; .>: >'I 15 r.: :.0:1 r- N.E. 23RDA F Ince G way s< STREET B y,: :,,.:(:.::31.1..1 3601. 358.2 357.0 355.1 o I 431.b.8 3108.<0 i3to3. 2 3 3 o sff .' \3 5r 3. i 375.8 `375.2 3b5.9 3b0.0 377.2 \3b7.9 `31.2.1 359.3\351..3 357.111 \ 2 57 1 I - 1 1 , I1 A I1I5t w L-- EXIST HOUSE1z II aI I Z I z : tIIIIa PPROPOSED 1 I \ I 2 ' DRIVEWAYI I\,L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON CITY COUNCIL RECORD OF DECISION APPLICANT: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES/ SKIP JACOBSON FILE NO.: PPUD-15-84 Vicinity of the 2200 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST:Approval of a revised preliminary PUD application for a multiple-family development with 72 dwelling units on 14.06 acres of land located on the south side of Honey Creek. The following report incorporates the Findings and Conclusions of the original report of the Hearing Examiner issued on March 4, 1985, which was later revised in the Hearing Examiner's report of January 17, 1986. Changes in some of the findings reflect the modified site plan for the P.U.D. FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Skip Jacobson, requests approval of a revision to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development (P.P.U.D) application for the Honey Creek P.U.D. The Honey Creek P.U.D. proposal consists of 72 dwelling units on approximately 14.06 acres of property. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, the previous decisions by the Hearing Examiner, and a revised site plan together with a remand and other pertinent documentation are a part of the record for the application. In addition, documentation includes decisions regarding on-site access. 3. The City Council, on April 14, 1986, adopted the recommendations of the Planning and Development Committee, approving the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner, as amended, to rezone the PUD site subject to: 1) submission of a final PUD; 2) annexation of the site into the City; 3) dedication of a full 40-foot right-of-way on N.E. 23rd; 4) submission with a final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis; 5) submission of detailed plans for the final PUD showing usable open space, recreation and building details; 6) provision of a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the subject site or portions of it were sold; 7) submission of a detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc.; 8) elimination of the connection and entry at N.E. 21st Street; 9) the property zoned R-1 shall have no development pending the City being provided detailed geotechnical information regarding site and site plan or PUD approval; and, 10) acknowledgement that current plans are for conceptual approval of a PPUD and do not vest in the applicant or assign any development rights on the subject parcel or property without recommendations of City staff and approval by Council of the geotechnical studies called for above. 4. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's Responsible Official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance on October 21, 1985. The Committee reviewed the revised request on October 16, 1985 and determined that the original determination is valid for the proposed revisions to the P.U.D. site plan. 5. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter on or between April 24, 1984 and October 10, 1985 and in succeeding years as needed to resolve issues. 6. The subject site is located in the vicinity of 2200 Jefferson Avenue N.E., immediately south and generally east of 120th Place S.E., more commonly known as Devil's Elbow. 7. The subject site was annexed to the City by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4095, enacted on November 25, 1987. 8. The subject site is a portion of a 47.7 acre site rezoned by the adoption of Ordinance No. 4141, enacted on March 24, 1988. The subject parcel received an R-2, Residential zoning classification which is a low density multiple-family zone allowing 12.1 dwelling units per acre. 9. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site as being suitable for the development of greenbelt and low density multiple-family uses, but does not allow such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 10. The configuration of the existing site was created through a lot line adjustment in King County approved in 1986. 11. A steep ravine is located adjacent to the property line running diagonally from the northernmost point of the property to the southeast corner of the site. Honey Creek is located at the bottom of this steep ravine. 12. Access to the subject site is limited due to the complex topography of the subject parcel and adjacent parcel to the northeast and east, and given the existing development pattern in the general area. Development surrounding the subject site is mixed. To the north and immediately north/northeast and east are undeveloped parcels of property which includes the majority of the ravine area and Honey Creek. To the east are single-family uses, generally clustered in single- family subdivisions. The property south of the site is developed with senior housing and duplex housing complexes developed during World War II. Finally, to the west, development consists of single-family residences. 13. The site, at one time, was part of an old quarry. The relatively level plateau, on which the development is proposed, is the result of the quarry activity. An old road grade was cut into the site from Devil's Elbow to approximately the area of the subject site. 14. Sewer service will be available to the site via hookup to the Honey Creek interceptor sewer which runs through the bottom of the adjacent ravine. 15. Storm drainage from the site will flow into Honey Creek, a fish spawning stream. Because of this, biofiltration of surface water runoff should occur before storm drainage discharges into this stream. 16. Water lines will need to be extended from Harrington Avenue N.E. to serve the site. 17. Considerable discussion has taken place over the years on the issue of access to the site. The public opposition to the development has focussed mostly upon site access, the inadequacy of the adjacent roads, and the impacts of traffic at these access points upon the adjacent single-family neighborhood. Both N.E. 21st Street and N.E. 23rd Street were found to be substandard streets, for example. The now proposed access road off of Jefferson Avenue N.E. will have grades of 10% to 15%. Devil's Elbow was dropped from consideration because of its grades as well as the fact that it had experienced continued instability. The Public Works Department has determined that Devil's Elbow is"not safe for either primary access or emergency access." 18. In March 1985, the original PPUD application for this site was denied by the Hearing Examiner based upon inaccurate density calculations. At that time, primary access was from Jefferson Avenue N.E., with a second access on N.E. 21st Street. A 20-foot wide, gated emergency access road was provided along N.E. 23rd Street. Following resubmittal in January 1986, the Hearing Examiner recommended the elimination of the second access on N.E. 21st Street and also required that the applicant bear the cost of upgrading these access roads. 19. With the elimination of the N.E. 21st Street access and the shifting of access to the south, the Council required, at its meeting on April 14, 1986, the "...dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of- way alignment with N.E. 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue N.E. and the site, with an engineering report and specifications for full street improvement as required by City Code." Because of subsequent difficulties in acquiring the necessary right-of-way, the applicants, Honey Creek Associates, asked the City in September, 1986 to assist them by starting condemnation proceedings (at the owners expense) against the owners of the adjacent properties. 20. On April 4, 1988, Council approved Honey Creek PPUD (PPUD-015-84) which became effective May 9, 1988 (Ordinance No. 4143). 21. In June of 1988, neighbors near the site supported the proposed Honey Creek PUD development as an improvement that would "discourage crime, dumping, and motorcycle access in the area." 22. After the City began condemnation proceedings, this matter was later appealed to the courts by one of the property owners whose property was being condemned. A Superior Court decision issued on April 25, 1988 barred the City from using eminent domain to acquire a full right-of-way on N.E. 23rd Street (it was felt that the City was using its powers to primarily benefit a private applicant). 23. At another public hearing on the PPUD on June 19, 1989, the Council was asked to decide whether to retain the approved PPUD requirement of two full access roads to the site or to reduce the requirement to one access road along N.E. Jefferson with a twenty foot, gated emergency access road on N.E. 23rd Street. The Council decided not to take action on this date. 24. At a subsequent meeting on July 24, 1989, the Council, in response to a request from the applicant, passed a motion to amend the PPUD to eliminate its earlier requirement that the applicant provide full street improvements including a 40-foot wide public right-of-way alignment along N.E. 23rd Street. Instead, Council called for the road to be improved only for emergency vehicle access using the twenty (20) feet of right-of-way that the City owns on N.E. 23rd Street. That motion also asked the Public Works Department to review the adequacy of streets serving the 2- southern exit from the site as well as look at safety issues on these streets and report back to Council. Staff determined that these streets were designed for local access as defined in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The size, construction and maintenance plans for these streets also indicates local access status. Neighborhood collectors per the Subdivision Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan are to be 60 feet- paved for 36 feet. 25. The traffic analysis prepared for the subject proposal predicted 60% of the PPUD development's traffic will travel south from the project site toward Kirkland Avenue N.E. The remainder of the traffic from this area of the site would travel north and west of the site. 26. Under the previous (1985) site plan, which had its primary access from N.E. 21st Street as well as Jefferson, residents along these streets were concerned that ingress and egress and subsequent improvements along these streets would open up an even more direct route through a residential neighborhood. This concern has been reduced under the latest site plan (drawing dated 1-24-90, see Exhibit "A") which limits primary access to Jefferson Avenue N.E. Traffic leaving the development heading north under the revised proposal would now have to exit via Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. Traffic traveling southward would likely travel the same route, but continue south on Edmonds Avenue N.E. 27. In June of 1989, Public Works evaluated whether N.E. 21st should be evaluated as an alternative to N.E. 23rd Street. They concluded there was: 1) insufficient right-of-way; and 2) traffic will pass through a single-family residential area. 28. On September 13, 1989, the Public Works Department reported back to the Council on improvements it felt were necessary to ensure pedestrian safety due to increased traffic generated by the subject proposal on September 25, 1989. This report was subsequently referred back to the Planning and Development Committee for their consideration. 29. The Planning and Development Committee held several meetings to study this matter. On December 11, 1989, the Planning and Development Committee recommended, and the Council approved, the following street improvement conditions: a.The developer will improve the road on its project to city standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. It is anticipated that the road will be dedicated to the city. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of the street. b.The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E., as follows: 1.Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. 2.Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E. which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. c.The developer will install the following school safety improvements: 1.A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E. with appropriate signing should be required. 2.Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E., south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. 30. Pursuant to this action, the applicant has proposed to use N.E. 23rd street as a gated emergency access. Although the City owns 20 feet of right-of-way on the extension of N.E. 23rd Street, not all of this can be used for improved roadway since a retaining wall has to be built along a portion of it. The Fire Department, on March 21, 1990, indicated that there is sufficient right-of-way to build the emergency access provided that the width of the paved portion of the right-of-way is not less than 18 feet wide. The applicants submitted revised plans on March 7, 1990 showing that this requirement could be met. Further, the applicant retained Terra Associates, Inc. to evaluate the adequacy of the proposed concrete retaining walls on either side of the roadway. The engineers determined that the design shown for the roadway improvements could be accomplished. 31. Density calculations which were based upon the PUD formula were originally a subject of dispute. With the revised PPUD plans, this issue is essentially resolved. The only potential area for dispute in the current case might be over the choice of contour intervals used in calculating steep slopes and the subsequent densities allowed. The Building and Zoning Department (now part of the 3- Community Development Department) had primary jurisdiction for determining the density. It appears the Department made a reasonable determination of the density in 1985. In addition, its decision was not disputed at the time. 32. The total number of units, barring slope, street and dedication deductions which could be accommodated on those portions of the site for which the applicant has requested R1 zoning would be 48.36, while 72 units could be accommodated on that portion of the site zoned R2, for a total of 120.36 units on the original 14.06 acre portion of the site currently under consideration. Dedications would reduce the acreage by approximately 0.85 acres or 5.1 units, and street set asides would reduce the acreage by 1.6 acres or 9.6 units. The slope formula used by the City staff, deducting the most acreage due to severe slope, would reduce the development potential by 31.9% or 33.71 units. The total would permit 71.95 units which was just .05 units below the applicant's request of 72 units. 33. The potential 72 units are planned only for that portion of the site lying to the south and west of Honey Creek. 34. No population projections or school age student projections were made for the subject proposal by staff in 1985. Using current standards, we would estimate that the 72 units of multi-family townhouses and flats would generate approximately 29 school age children. This compares to an estimated 26 school age children if the site were developed with an estimated 43 single-family homes. 35. The project, with its 72 units, would generate an estimated 430 vehicle trips per day. Comparisons were drawn indicating that the development of approximately 43 single-family homes (under single-family zoning on this site) would generate, at 10.0 AWDTE per dwelling unit a similar amount of traffic as 72 units at 6.5 AWDTE per dwelling unit (468 vehicle trips per day). 36. The majority of soils found on the site are sandy soils of Class III. Such soils typically imply that such a site would be susceptible to erosion, earthquake and landslide damage. Slides occurred while the sewer line was being installed in the creek bed, and other slides and sloughs have occurred in the past along the steep walls above Honey Creek, both on and off the subject site. The applicant has addressed this by restricting their development to those portions of the site having a mean average slope of less than 10 percent. In addition, the use of native vegetation buffers on steep slopes should be provided to further reduce the likelihood of slides. CONCLUSIONS 1. The development of the subject site using the PUD provisions of the Building Regulations would appear to be in the public interest. The unique topography and environment of the subject site can best be protected by clustering new development on those portions of the site that are less prone to erosion or landslide damage and staying away from areas having steeper slopes such as along Honey Creek. The 1982 PUD provisions allow such density clustering when it is in the public interest. The proposed 72 multi-family units would not produce substantially more traffic than a 43 unit single-family residential development (permitted under the current zoning). The PUD appears to present a reasonable method of developing an environmentally sensitive site, permits the applicant reasonable use of the site (which is private property) and appears to protect the site's fragile environment better than most other uses except possibly a park or open space use. The latter, however, would do little to police the site and reduce unauthorized use of the site by those dumping litter, shooting off firecrackers, and driving motorcycles across it. 2. The topographical isolation of the site would also appear sufficient to avoid any adverse impacts from incompatible housing types or densities on adjoining properties. Whereas under the 1985 site plan, buildings in the southwest corner of the site were within 90 feet of the western and southern property lines. Under the latest 1990 site plan, there is at least a 190 foot separation from the nearest residential building to the southern or western property lines. The housing under this latest site plan would be clustered and encircle the level westerly plateau, which would be left for open space purposes. 3. Multi-family dwelling units at this location would allow for more variety and diversity in the existing neighborhood and allow more housing choices for those who wish to reside in this part of the City, be they existing or new residents. At this stage, the applicant has not provided a definitive plan for the different multi-family housing types being proposed. Only a schematic proposal, as is required for Preliminary PUDs, has been submitted at this time. A breakdown as to unit size, type and number of bedrooms should be provided for all units and buildings in the PUD. 4. The issue of slope stability has not yet been adequately addressed. While the site seems suitable from a land use perspective for a PUD of 72 units, the geological underpinnings of the site need to be more fully explored. With the submission of the Final PUD, the applicant will have to present a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Department of Community Development and the Public Works Departments. The report 4- shall include, but not be limited to, information regarding: site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their current state; long term implications of development on slope stability; geologic hazard including earthquake analysis; plans for site preparation and restoration, as well as building construction techniques that will minimize ground instability and/or subsidence due to settling or erosion. The applicant should be required to provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is ever sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowners/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. 5. The access concerns of residents remain even with the scaling down of the proposal from 120 units to 72 units. It is not just the increased population of the subject proposal, but the creation of a new defacto "through" street - connection along Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. to N.E. 16th Street which raises concerns about safety to nearby residents and school age children. The streets surrounding the subject site to the south were not designed as collector streets, and in their current state should not be utilized as such. Even with the upgrading of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and Harrington Avenue N.E. with street improvements, and surface upgrading, the proposed access to the site may pose some problems to nearby residents since homes along these streets are located closer to the street than would normally be the case along collector streets. 6. The applicant's latest proposal, using Jefferson Avenue N.E. for primary access and N.E. 23rd Street as a gated emergency approach to the site, makes sense now that the City's Fire Marshal has agreed to accept a roadway width of less than 20 feet on N.E. 23rd Street. Many other complexes, such as Cedar Ridge and Woodcliffe, have one primary entry with an emergency access which is gated, and some, such as Forest Brook, only have one entry point. With the elimination of secondary access and the changing of N.E. 23rd Street into emergency access only, there no longer is a need to keep the previously proposed secondary access along N.E. 21st Street. 7. The site plan for the Preliminary PUD now appears reasonable and should be approved. (NOTE: Plans for the Final PUD would have to follow the layout shown in the Preliminary PUD but also be more detailed and show the requisite open space, recreation areas, and building design details.) DECISION: Based upon the above analysis, the Council hereby approves the preliminary P.U.D., File PPUD-015-84, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide a detailed geotechnical report with the submission of the final PUD application. The report shall address site stability/slope integrity; preservation of the ravine and stream close to their existing state; analyze the long term erosion potential by the development; identify geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; provide specifics on site preparation and restoration; and identify appropriate building techniques for the site. 2. The applicant shall construct and maintain gated secondary emergency access along the right-of- way of N.E. 23rd Street which shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall and Public Works Director, with a minimum width of 18 feet of paving. 3. The applicant shall provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. In addition, the applicant shall record covenants running with the land requiring that the slope on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as closely as is possible in its natural state. 4. The applicant shall improve the road on its project to City standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. The roadway shall be dedicated to the City. Sidewalks will be provided on one side of the street. 5. The applicant shall improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E., as follows: 1.Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. 2.Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E. which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. 5- 6. The applicant shall install the following school safety improvements: a.A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E.,with appropriate signing, should be required. b.Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E., south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E. to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. 7. The submittal of detailed plans for the final PUD, providing a description of the usable open space, recreation and building details. 8. The final PUD shall comply with relevant City PUD review criteria (contained in Section 4-15-5 and 4-15-10 of the City Code) as they pertain to: separation of pedestrian and vehicular circulation; privacy within and between units; preservation of views and natural features; siting of carports and/or garages; treatment of exterior building surfaces for aesthetic and durability reasons; lighting; signage; and landscaping. 9. The applicant shall comply with all existing and any subsequent mitigation conditions imposed by the City's responsible SEPA official, the Environmental Review Committee. 10. The applicant shall submit a detailed tree inventory and landscaping and on-site improvements plan acceptable to the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 11. The applicant shall submit plans and bonds for all on and off site improvements stipulated by the Public Works Department, including those improvements identified in their memo of September 13, 1990 to the Council. 12. The applicant shall submit a detailed construction impact mitigation plan acceptable to the Community Development Department prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 13. The applicant shall work with Community Development and Parks and Recreation Department staff to develop appropriate on-site recreation facilities for future residents prior to submittal of the Final PUD. 14. The final PUD shall comply with the time limits for PUDs as set forth in Section 4-15-11.F. of the City Code. 6- LtUHL uCJf-.ntr I IvIM i c YIAT'S 40 IIIIITS S i 7•uwu11045Ei—__]i.PI!,1.5 1 Tvi'AI. Ix vun' sY c w1 i 1'r 1: AREA: 512,450 S.r. (14.05 ACKER)P OF Uf.O1CAT IUII; ]•r,750 S.r. r 1 l I J 0 ITC AREA: 532,700 S.F. (12.27 ACRES) i/ ,', / n 1TL' DENSITY: 5.09 11111TS/ACRL fl j//,/ 8, /t/(i 1 7] URITS K 1.5 ' 100 STA I.IS 4 , J j•r,(\f_ r•1 cursT PARKING -1 iVIt'IS_iv._— AI1 s GL. I r f i;. I 4 c. i t h•rar•1 FIATS 10 r.111C0111:11 GARAGE:: 1 fyt t5ICANIOVT:: I•/ C•/ .\ j iiirij1 _ .. 1 • A R r j 1( ‘ S0 OIT'.11 KTAITS J 1 i ) 1 -- K,,,,... \I-. ,.........'\ --.-‘ t:.„,, .s.r --) i I i N.71 r.. ‘.1m., . .t (/ i / i k. r ) . , ypit 5.------: . ..., . ii 1 (((// ° 7--------. c---____------< 7-. 7.--.........--- jj 4,i k \ o 400 ... ;:m444.... t t ‘• c: ift,„104A-.. . - 4 * ) , i 16 a - _„, ------:- :.:-.7-,,N,... 16011 c .. 1,4,- . .,.. ' A., .4 7j--1: 1 p As , , . .t i l' t,, ''.. j V14, ,..--7" me 1 i • 1\ C, V' .. ...,....7: t2::;:: - 00'il-- I- 4 / v. w ` Fl.-•.‘.--• 1 ram ` J 1.// //. i r- 1 ?) Af -.N mil/ //,,. f -I '/ / / / r. 7. •..., . i-"; Y0r' i 4/ 1-.: i,-" 11.-r. 7-...._..:-:-_-.:: T--P-.,-.."K1,t-,-z.'..,..:-,.-,-..c.:,tI„lmDl. 7- 317 7 I i 'r t gyp 1 r' I i-- I V','..jtr" M1tih ` 11b'7iv ' " 4 / 1__ - l T J—E•F...F— 7: SN ml AVE. N.E. C1 - ram - rr tea.. 1, Erb O,VJ-- •—'-- Tet A6 y /.y0 1J 00' S! 3/ C /(49.oo r / F- 1 \ J I m0 h4 17 N ro r CI N w SITE i r - 1I1 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DIVISION FEE RECEIPT N? 58321 PERMIT NO. RENTON, WA. !J13\ 19 RC RECEIVED OF iNA‘ DOLLARS Paid by: 000/322.10.00.11 Building Fee 000/322/10.00.12 Electrical Fee 0 CHECK 000/322.10.00.13 Mechanical Fee 000/322.10.00.16 Sign Fee CASH 000/322.10.00.18 Fire Permit Fee 000/345.83.00.00 Plan Check Fee 000/343.21.00.00 Housing Insp. Fee 000/237.09.00.00 Building Code Fee 604/237.00.00.00 Special Deposits Las s 1 , Cki Ronald G elson, Building Official BY TOTAL rnv hi rinru 1 n iao P CITY OF RENTON OF ifr Wy A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FNT NN MEMORANDUM C 19, 90 O DATE: May 31, 1990 TO: Rento City Council FROM: nneth E. Nyberg, Director SUB,Honey Creek PPUD STAFF CONTACT: Larry Springer/Don Erickson The attached material is provided for your background and information relevant to the public hearing on the subject PPUD which is scheduled for public hearing on Monday, June 4th. Included in the attached data is a staff report dated May 29th which provides some background, and addresses several topics which have been at issue in this PPUD and makes a recommendation that council approve the PPUD with five conditions. The site plan for the proposed PPUD is also included in exhibit A. If Council chooses to accept the staff recommendation and approve this PPUD , there is a record of decision which Council can refer to the Ways and Means Committee that would complete this action. The Record of Decision is labeled Exhibit B. Finally, there are exhibits from the Fire Department (Exhibit C & E) and the Public Works Department (Exhibit D). The PPUD has a history of over five years of processing, caused primarily by efforts to mitigate and re-design the project to accommodate both location and topographical problems. Given the long history of this project, it's complexity and some recent modifications, Council felt it appropriate to hold another public hearing. This has been scheduled for June 4th. To assist Council, a chronology of the project is shown as pages 1 thru 4 of Exhibit B of this report. When Council last considered the PPUD, the remaining issues were reduced to access to the site and the hearing of June 4th has been so advertised. Both Staff and the City Attorney will be available on Monday night , June 4th, to answer any specific questions about the current status of the project application. JUN 4 1990 n1.15-NQ pCrD.CA Eo...OW U i.. C1./, Lori 16. t l YJ,CMdJ ewe c<reN,PION f- d-d1lJiNC.2 ONQY 1 .15-C`t YA= D E.VSL6 SECTION C-C 1.yPROPCRTY E F.1 I I! eLe", 255.I I I t ,te.3QV 0..21•CK51,4 ION+ 11u' 1l I1l 11 p1.1R1JNC1 5 CIJIL IhK 7 UIl1J,NC,11 y v 5.'ibt m C, n AWMJN4/ R`•AWNG r JvCI b` nil f iivG/w LC OWVC N9l.0CRCLItIiovr7VE'll4!;, ; tie SECTION D-D A lI` ICI ., c l t:ill1 i i a.-`V1 I , z 3 ete 0= t 1 1 ? I z = z 7. R e tcehe. Eln Y U -- s' I? il II ' I IIL v101% G.Lo N4 D w oNy<e4-111-01Nc 11 2r. i I'II ern I ilil G N SECTION E-E 41(r. i, 1 1 ' i a 11r1 v Z a > SITE CROSS SECTIONS Z. C E, -O o42.6G..L5 r-.d-a 1 JohnsonBraund design group, Inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants fu.. wr..w....r r.>..•.. •..ter. r.r.•.a«. u.. • 4 v i n..n.r..r.r. VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION CrA'1 i Ar',/, 0./. 1 eimpo4i1 , _ v11omit } it i .... ..:C"'' 7- 0+ 0 .,. , , e. / 1 _ tif ,. mr, 1177) ( ,, 1 / t: STATISTICSPIj G/• e tirt, Iv V. 1 L: I' ,..11?, to'fl.I. i 1-:.; : :- tn 3 ice--.-.--._--.-..-_._-,-.. __,__._,_.,,,„__„_.-, m o, ti I.1.i w•V —;•,. Qit f f;,j ! f i? 4 ail‘A-18-8123"- ge.,-„,: II:. At% 44 ,;. 110. 4 0,' -- i 41 04/a0.'4 -- letrifiwir, •--. , -- 4-‘,..?",„., 7 v,,,,,,., •,114.14, 7/' / ../...2 idillirf ' IlL0 . i ,//' ' _ i - ttXr• ___...•'-' 114 .....,.-...A,'''' t ebb, . -''. 1-5 "".--ebtr,?:.___-_ 1 7•• ...' V- / ce r = e s J' aJ` t - _ WE XI- Amor A 10/ i At e 1 J J / i V w SITE PLAN IP V. JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants JUN 4 1990 i - - 1>!.O "EI.n..G IvG-ou•1r1144 V -c .-K,HT-or-v4o 1, N a III N. 7-- E...05 ref ge.nne M.E.23E0 EL. r I1 I III I aC ( E IsLdIororlve., r, F.F-Is 1c'"'7=.,,,@IIC A u0m M.E.fa11D I E hl triE",•, CA: .W.DI-, 111 orb,This x-sec to'I s ichomgtia QpOliti ono! Meld ya' . data IsrePqarEzliOWrlcis} W II i TiGYF>. l A 73 A- A: section at n.e. 23rd street-emergency access road Ct,aE..NC,eE \ II q i l I l II te . 13 I IIII iI yn..:r r- sn„u--V-•OTioa. II nt+•Z7 O rocresry ore y o liY1.Tn T ELW -------- (COSINE IOC IS IIIIl1+YaV T tE+E6 OVROiWOO Ce O) 11 Z r I II S YG'' l'! y_ I CODE I II =--` r 2 , ail ! • ti- — 0e, aE9 I I ', IA1K\ .^, l M.E.alar STREET Y 440 NOC105tD« __ a1E S L_ L ,O _ c SECTION B-B SCALE HORIZONTAL I 0 VERTICAL ,.10. wi i MD I ED x RALE 1•NO. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION JohnsonBraund design group, inc. architecture,landscape&planning consultants 23Rr> /'AVENUE NE,-EXI TINCq _ I-0II - IC1HT-OF-W/°.Y tiil 11.= L EXI TINc C FZf 111'0 N f1 an COCRETE FZET^ININ r L j N TYP E. N"Li.- CH SIOicn-- —tll I! I OF OLIVE. 3111 ill • • . 11 1 ii F—rit --_— vl;._i ti_— Tf1i,JC is G I I?.(Y1q I G vy 15 Y E•' t-1 r,J tG \/,%r I ry Is I , A - A: section at n.e. 23rd street . emergency access road i I I I 1 N.E. 23RD PL. 17 I 1-------I 14 16 l EXISTING ASPHALT WITH GURn I I 15N 1 I A EXI5TIHG [ACM . r-- N.E. 23RDIFENCSTREET 1 B I® \ 366.1 Lo. 8.z 357.0 355.1 3tob.8 3(o8.(0 I e363.2 357.3 /35ta. MQM '• 1 \ 354.1 3. I f 375.8 `375.2 \3b5.9 5:8 3 3100.0 377.2 \30.9 `312.1 1359.3\351.o.3\357.0 3.2.2 7 I w 1 -- IHOUSEZEXISTn1. d \ „ \ O II \ \\\ FC t I Q 11 1 I I I III \ I 1 CL.PKOFOSE D IafRIVFLAY I I II 1 , '. l I I I I I. . Jo, / 1),,,,.. 1/( _, CftY of RENrON Pi Ali RE r E ! V EDCITYOFRENTOIo0WV's,ONRFNToni MAY 2 9 1990 ATArCOMMUNITYDEVELOPMENTMEMORANDUi /990 COMMUDEP.ATXENT VED DATE: May 24, 1990 TO: Earl Clymer, Mayo j J FROM: Lynn Gut az6--sitrublic Works Director L SUBJECT: THE REMOVAL OF A PORTION OF N.E. 27TH STREET(DEVIL'S ELBOW) FROM THE ROLLS OF CITY STREETS N.E. 27th Street (Devil's Elbow), from a point 350 feet East of Edmonds Avenue N.E. to 122nd Avenue S.E. (on the east side of Honey Creek), has been closed for the past three years. The problem causing the closure is earth slides at a number of points along that roadway within the area of closure. Geotechnical investigations have been done to determine the repairs necessary to bring the street into compliance with Renton's current street construction standards, and to make it safe for the general public. It has been determined that the nature of those repairs would be heroic in nature and extremely costly, and that an alternative to repairing that section of street, perhaps a bridge, would provide for greater public safety. Since traffic and emergency response patterns have been established and confirmed over the past three years, the described portion of N.E. 27th Street can remain closed until an acceptable, safe, alternative can be found. Therefore, N.E. 27th Street from a point 350 east of Edmonds Avenue N.E. to 122nd Avenue S.E. will remain closed and will be removed from the rolls of active City streets. The inactive right-of-way will remain, and the east access will be kept open for emergency and utility use, as it is now. cc: Department Heads Division Heads a 0 CITY OF RENTON i PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maintenance Division DATE: 18 May 1990 TO: Lynn Guttmann FROM: Jack Cr ey SUBJECT: Devil ' s Elbow Road Closing With Alice gone I could not find the original closure memo I wrote a couple of months ago, so I have drafted another one. As I remember, what we wanted to do is take Devil ' s Elbow off the rolls of our streets and had decided that could be done with a memorandum form you to the other department heads . DRAFT a TO: 1 Department Head C"\ C FROM: Lynn Guttmann) Phl t Y SUBJECT: The Removal a Portion of NE 27th Street (Devil ' s Elbow) From The Rolls of City Streets NE 27th Street (Devil ' s Elbow) , from a point 350 feet east of Edmonds Av NE to 122nd Av SE (on the east side of Honey Creek,) -has been closed for the past three years . The problizi causing the closure is earth slides at a number of points along that roadway within the area of closure. Geotechnical investigations have been done to determine the repairs necessary to bring the street into compliance with Renton ' s current street construction standards , and to make it safe for the general public. It has been determined that the nature of those repairs would be heroic in nature and extremely costly, and that an alternative to repairing that section of street,perha( ps a bridge, would provide forgreaterpublicsafety Since traffic emergenn y response pa erns have been S,Qlstablishedoverthewthreeyears , portion of fie- /4E2 T t can remain closed until an acceptable, safe, alternative can be found. Therefore, NE 27th Street from a point 350 east of Edmonds Av NE to 122nd Av SE will remain closed and will be removed from the rolls of active City Streets . The inactive right-of-way will remain, and the C61:- ) 3555 N.E. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98056 east access will be kept open for emergency and utility use, as it is now. L'1 i `05-r-cif .. " ` ‘2 May 21, 1990 nton City Council Minutes Page 151 O /S ry Citizen Comment: Gross - Susan Gross, 15807 SE 171st Place, Renton, requested assistance from the WSDOT, I-405 S-Curve City regarding the demolition of the houses on Renton Hill which are to be Project destroyed for the I-405 S-curve project. She stated that some of the houses have been vacant since last August and noted that these houses have suffered from vandalism and/or transients living in the vacant houses. She added that she had contacted the State office and received unsatisfactory answers as to when the demolition would be completed. Ms. Gross expressed concern for the remaining residents in the area who are subjected to the vandalism and transients as a result of the unfinished project. Councilwoman Keolker- Wheeler requested Administration look into this matter and contact the state to get some satisfactory answers. Mayor Clymer advised that he is scheduled to meet with Ron Johnson of the Washington State Department of Transportation on Wednesday, May 23rd to discuss these concerns. Councilman Stredicke questioned if the City has regulations pertaining to vacated houses. City Attorney Warren answered that some regulations exist which could be reviewed by the Building Department. Further discussion from the audience concluded that the only solution to the problem is to demolish the abandoned houses as soon as possible. Councilman Edwards questioned what authority the Renton Police Department had to cite people who are illegally present on the property. Mayor Clymer agreed to review the matter. Citizen Comment: Webb - Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, added that there is no order to 1-405 S-Curve Project the way the houses are being taken down and suggested that the houses be demolished in sequence. He reiterated that the state either gives no answers or unsatisfactory answers regarding the current issues. He reported examples of possible violations of City Code regarding improper land use and zoning. Councilwoman Zimmerman recalled a meeting recently attended by the Mayor and Council members regarding the homes to be demolished and jurisdiction being removed from the City. She requested that the Mayor discuss the concerns over the jurisdiction of these homes when he attends the meeting on Wednesday with WSDOT. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler requested Council receive periodic update information regarding the S-curve project. Citizen Comment: Murray Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, referred to a public hearing Honey Creek PPUD scheduled for 6/4/90, regarding the Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit 015-84 Development (PPUD-015-84). He requested that the public hearing before the City Council be postponed until a public hearing has been scheduled and held before the hearing examiner to review major changes to the PPUD. He cited the following changes: location and number of foundations; location of interior roadways; size and location of interior recreation areas; emergency access plans as currently proposed are unbuildable due to encroachment on neighboring property for construction purposes; alteration of traffic flow on rl the local neighborhood access has been changed from 23rd and Jefferson to Jefferson. Mr. Murray called attention to City Code which requires that the hearing examiner hold a public hearing for major changes in a revision to a PPUD, and stated that he felt the project should be reviewed by the hearing examiner to determine conformance to City Code and document the concerns of the public in an open forum. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler asked City Attorney Warren about the jurisdiction of this project. She noted that because the Honey Creek Project was begun several years ago, it was for the benefit of the new Council members to hear testimony in its entirety at Council rather than reading from a written document from the hearing examiner. Attorney Warren explained that the Council retained jurisdiction over the topic after an appeal had been filed regarding the emergency access on NE 23rd. He noted that several meetings had taken place regarding this issue and the Committee wished to make sure that the neighborhood had an opportunity to be heard on what type of improvements were necessary due to all the traffic being carried on a I single access street. He reported that he was unaware of any new plans being submitted that may or may not be a major modification to the PPUD. He further stated that those changes must go before the hearing examiner as per City Code, but this matter is presently retained in the Council's jurisdiction and has been so for the past 18 months. 1 May 21, 1990 nton City Council Minutes Pane 152 Councilwoman Zimmerman questioned the public's right of appeal when heard by the Council as compared to being heard by the hearing examiner. Attorney Warren answered that if the hearing were held by the hearing examiner, the public has the right of appeal to the City Council. He added that if the Council heard the hearing, the appeal would then be to the courts. He stated that through the hearing examiners system, the appeal process is internalized as long as possible to give citizens, as well as developers, at least two opportunities locally to appeal. Citizen Comment: Hellene Tom Hellene, 18233 - 141st Avenue SE, Renton, referred to recent articles in North Soos Creek the newspaper regarding the annexation of the Cascade Vista, Petrovisky and Fairwood) Annexation Fairwood areas. He expressed concern about the statements of substantial increase in opposition and no real support for the annexation. He stated that until there are firm answers, there is very little for a proponent to determine the appropriateness of the annexation. On the other hand, the opposition has a few facts, which are inaccurate. He referred to the Fairwood Flyer of April 15, 1990, which contained inaccurate information regarding the annexation issue. Mr. Hellene has developed a response to misinformation contained in the flyer which he felt contributes to the increased opposition. He stressed that the silence from the proponents and opposition from opponents need to be put in perspective. Citizen Comment: Marla McNeese, 12243 SE 184th, Petrovisky area, stated that she had gone McNeese - North Soos door-to-door in her neighborhood with a petition against annexation and Creek (Fairwood) obtained 90 signatures. She stated that she likes living in the county and has Annexation nothing against the City of Renton, but she is against the annexation. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Claim: Smalls, CL 32-90 Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by Emma Lee Smalls, 7325 Rainier Avenue South, Seattle, for damage to automobile allegedly caused by patrol vehicle which failed to yield the right-of-way (11/25/89) CL 32-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Court Case: Cameron Court Case filed by Daniel R. Cameron vs. City of Renton and Burlington Northern Railroad for injuries allegedly caused by raised obstruction projecting from the bridge in Cedar River Park located at 1717 Maple Valley Highway. Refer to City Attorney. Parks: Surplus City Parks Department submitted list of surplus city property and requested Property for Public authorization for sale at public auction tentatively planned for June. Refer to Auction Community Services Committee. Finance: Utility Tax Finance Department requested adoption of resolution for collection of utility Collection taxes on "brokered" natural gas sales in the same manner as "regular" natural gas sales. Approval of the resolution would allow the State Department of Revenue to collect this tax on the City's behalf starting July 1, 1990. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. CAG: 89-047, 1989 Street Public Works/Transportation Systems Divisions submitted CAG 047-89, 1989 Overlay Street Overlay project; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of 18,831.04 retained amount to contractor, M.A. Segale, Inc., if all required releases have been received. Council concur. CAG: 88-030, Wells No.Public Works/Water Utility Engineering Division submitted CAG 030-88, 10, 11, & 17 Production Wells No. 10, 11, and 17 Production Well Drilling project; and requested Well Drilling Project approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of $7,935.84 retained amount to contractor, Armstrong Drilling, Inc., if all required releases have been received. Council concur. CAG: 88-043, W-722 Public Works/Water Utility Engineering Division submitted CAG-043-88, W- South Talbot Hill 722, South Talbot Hill Reservoir Schedule A - Site Work project; and Reservoir Schedule A - requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate, Site Work Project commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of $40,528.03 retained amount to contractor, Del-Mar Construction Company, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. i 7z ; c ; 7 ' C,F IIIII 4r47 cJ/ ,11 / 4 Y ri-r, app cv 4 /772,, 1 A H. 427zi..; /7421 y- v I y 7 v` ,f-V4 t4/ 411191 W.; vo vf-t cv 0 J <? PA/ N—A,/ L-vc-7 t—L-177v1 q v c..17cj 2--)d a-L S; 3„......2.:,,,.... c/ //A7-1-1/ ,i-- c.-41 cy----,_./ --- b L. ;.--.)d ry i i -2._: ), 2/p/2.•_-.2:20 rz_.___L V LW L.:ii 7,Z . 3- i_. i rv,V '."7> 4 ( vil i' '''( i./ --,--'›- i t i 7 ---) 2 / 'r"/ j1Lii..,1 .,, .. ! 2,1 d .. _v,__ J._i-7- -L---1..L---- I f ii1- 1 1.--3.1Vi -:----'-;?:::.;.W cy ‘,.: •,_; r9 ----- 3 :"" '? 76 c7p' e P)1f_,e47 W/7—Cy/ AK. Sz, /3 /1). .- z 3 /12 A Pc-4-e.E. 1e7/1.1`7`- */1., J. o/L)c (( fr> T c I t'( ")<":- A t74;-r C A A rc.c H Fie Nr- A)<.• ) 0A.15 / 4 c-„.-„,< pViSe tz -.4 i- -cSrcv9 eE3 r t..e A r k: t c, c._ A 5 F)-crim .5cz. A 11-E-PLITT-7; 71-70 N y <Jo t) A-f"c-ez967_2 1_- kr,a)-714:6t,-( 1 gay 0719s71:› rPc4 i.rfwEGe..0 L,cf rLAe51}, TifF: f tl 11/4 -/JAcio--,A; clE7c\iuts-- 7A-/U110i< c-cAiAi7 ,AP Aetarti514-A-3 1,61?-tic • z ofIiv c-40 I5 5-- ;zejt-eiv _2t56e) y1,41EZ7 5- 111--tfe,X1 4 a& 4)-C---, cZ S>7-7C--eeC- 7-2 772A-5-F ( c- WE Fu-rag OF u / tL. t-?CF PC-i)F icVU V / 144-,e-Lifce-- c) ik--;--"t Occe/417ez-e- I? t C 1V1-M s 44Lzk/fe 51- CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT f2 a 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 4= Y • CITY OF RENTON MAT 7 1 1990 Address Coii.es. RECEIVED MR. THOMAS A. JOHNSON, AIA CITY CLERKS OFFICE JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP 304 MAIN AVENUE S. , SUITE 200 RENTON, WA o"" r o 8R€U304 9805530/1 1989 05/19/90 cs— RETURN{ }TOSENDERptIia*ZNSON- BRAUND 134 ANDOVER PK E. *301 16 SEA 'T .E WA SS1xRRETURNTOSENDER CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON Add erjs Cu rec. me 2 1 1990 RECEIVED MR. GREG DIENER CITY CLERK'S OFFICE JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98055 SRAU30+ 980553011 1989 Ow/19/90 RETURN TO SENDER 3CHNSON 1 RAUND 130 ANDOVER P1<. E *301 SEATTLE WA 93108 RETURN TO SENDER CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON A d eta MAY 2 1 1990 Requested RECEIVED MR. MEL EASTER, ARCHITECT CITY CLERK'S OFFICE JOHNSON BRAUND DESIGN GROUP 304 MAIN AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WA 98 _ BRAU304 980553011 15 9 05r 19 9O RETURN TO SENDER lHHSON BRAUND 3 O r NDOVER PX E #S01 SEATTLE WA 9S18$ RETURN TO SENDER CITY OF RENTON FINAN l CE DEPARTMENT w 1 1A 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 4 CITY OF RENTCN Cu. MQI 21 990 Req e ;(P RECEIVEDMR. MICHAEL GORMLEY 816 NORTH 4TH CITYCLERKS OFFICE RENTON, WA 98055 ir- et GORMS16 980553011 1385 05/19/90 G1 ;Rt9L. FORWARDING TIME EXPIRED EY 3000 !ROYAL HILLS DR SE #3F RENTON WA s8O58M3 aSS RETURN TO SENDER CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT ti-_ co 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 E.fuh_ v jtonUespd MR. MRS. WAYNE OYLER 3 HARRINGTON PLACE NE CITY OF RENTON ij RENTON, WA 98056 MAY 2 1 1990 3 2-o RECEIVED o-' CITY CLERK'S OFFICE II,I„I„I,IIn„I,I„II„I„I,,,II,II,,,,I„II,,,I1 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 Address Correction Requested MR. MICK SANTA 4444 CITY OF RENTON ISSAQUAH,,QWA 98027LAKE ROAD MAY 2 1 1990 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE NOT CEL VERAELE `----_.e. Svc SAS ADDRESSED y 0661 UNABLE TO FCRWARJ '''--) r 0e A1 RETURN TO SENDER o W cl i„Ll'a , I{„{ CITY OF RENTON r____; ,_,,..\FINANCE DEPARTMENT a 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 loAskA 1ig.eJS vorIe It CITY OF RENTON MS. SUSAN BRODERICK NIA( 2 ; 1990 13032 SE 104TH STREET RENTON, WA 98056 RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE x RETURN ---. a b'h TO e-.,----) S WENDERv> 1d$ iitildisiiiissifiti iiiiii ititi„fills iffiliiiii CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT k 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 aY'•.s ` lE i Erb" • * CITY OF RENTON MS. LORRAINE DAMMAN M A 1 2 t 1990 2809 NE 23RD PLACE RECEIVED RENTON, WA 98056 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DAMt•1SO RETURN TM SENDER DAMI ,N FORT SELVUIR VA 2206e —O: OE RETURN TO SENDER s$ p CITN OF RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Dan Clements,Director May 17, 1990 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING MARILYN J.PETERSEN, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 17th day of May, 1990, at the hour of 5:00 p.m., your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail, to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, HONEY CREEK PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ACCESS, AND FINAL ACTION ON PPUD. PROPOSAL CONSISTS OF 72 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ON 12.23 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF JEFFERSON AVENUE NE AND EAST OF NE 21ST STREET (PPUD-015-84). 27 Marilynen, CMC City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 17th day of May, 1990. jiCi jj,,ati7\_____ Notary blic in and for the State o ashington, residing in King County 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2558 t%CITN 3F RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor May 17, 1990 To:Parties of Record Re:Honey Creek PPUD, File No. PPUD 015-84 The Renton City Council will hold a public hearing on June 4, 1990, to accept testimony on the subject of access to the Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD), and consider final action on the PPUD. The proposal consists of 72 multifamily units on 12.23 acres located north of Jefferson Avenue NE and east of NE 21st Street. Net density of the project is 5.89 units per acre. Any and all interested parties are invited to attend the hearing. If additional information is required, please contact the City Clerk at 235-2502 or Planning Manager Larry Springer at 235-2552. Yours truly, Y-2ra-a Marilyn J. P 2sen, CMC City Clerk cc: Community Development Director Planning Manager 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 0 ice U u fir'`- PARTIES CF RECORD RQr " CvW HONEY CREEK PUD (R-014-84) PAGE 1 May 16, 1990 Alton Benson Mike Gould 2125 Harrington NE 12129 SE 96th Place Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Russell Bergeron Roger Green 2807 :NE 21st Street 9818 - 124th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 Ben Barry Michael M. Hannis 2725 4E 23rd Street 3900 E. Valley Hwy. , Suite 203 Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98055 Susan Brod rick ` d F'A" d John L. Hendrickson 13032 104th Street rulLw"5 Lucas, Glase, Sherman & Ren , WA 98056 Hendrickson Honeywell Center, Suite 505 Pete Caple 600 - 108 Avenue NE 9628 - 123rd SE Street Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton, WA 98056 Amos Huseland Randy Corman 1916 Edmonds Avenue NE 2216 Harrington Place NE Renton, WA 98056 Renton, WA 98056 Stanley Huseland Lorraine Damman 120 West Market Street 2809- NE P.0 ot Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Renton, WA 98056 FoR\ Rel uo+r)OA 2.1 "4 o —cSl°S Eva Jean Hyley Greg Diener Huseland Educational Trust Fund Johnson Braund Design Group 1224 South 211th Street 4.04 Main Aiue South Seattle, WA 98148 Rentcn, War---98055 Thomas A. Johnson, AIA Mel Easter, Architect Johnson Braund Design Group Johnson Braund Design Group 304 Maili Avenue- ,-Suite 200 O4 19ain---Avenue South' Renton, WA- 989-59-- 4 Renton, WA 98055 ; Donald Joss Roger Fletcher 9805 - 126th Avenue SE 2509 NE 23rd Place Renton, WA 98056 Rentcn, WA 98056 Kathleen Gormley Robert & William Kobayash 2820 NE 23rd Place 2707 NE 125th Rentcn, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98125 Michael Gormley Marian Lee 8-1-C NForth 4th 3o00 ells R S 9634 122nd Ave. SE Balntonr WA --9-815.J43' #t" qF Renton, WA 98056 Q804-8 -38SS au...v.. p c # PTYOFREC.DOC 13 0 v K• G ' ISsa e_ L A 9'8t88 PARTIES CF RECORD HONEY CREEK PUD (R-014-84) PAGE 2 May 16, 1990 Bob L,3mley Bob Tomberg 6005 :-azelwood Drive SE 5611 119th SE, #2 Bellevue, WA 98006 Bellevue, WA 98006 Alex 4acLachlan Chuck Velte Bruch & Veldrich Inc. 12117 SE 96th Place 7905 159th Place NE Renton, WA 98056 Redmond, WA 98052 Mr. Visick T. B. Malmoe 12405 SE 98th Street 12105 SE 96th Place Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 Margaret Webb Curtis J. Martin 14126 - 150th Place SE 3728 Park Avenue N. Renton, WA 98056 Rentcn, WA 98055 Chuck Youngquist Mitch: Murray 12110 SE 96th 2813 NE 23rd Place Renton, WA 98055 Rentcn, WA 98056 Mr. S Mrs. Wayne Oyler e1S,. 23 Harrington Place NE Rentcn, WA 98056 Norm Peterson 3402 Park Avenue N. Renton, WA 98056 George Pratt 1211E SE 96th Place Renton, WA 98056 Pat :;ado 9902 126th Avenue SE Renton, WA 98055 Mick Sant 4444 Is quah-Pine Lake Rd. Issaqeah, WA 98027 John Sargent 2016 Edmonds Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 John Sullivan 2633 NE 23rd Street Renton, WA 98056 PTYOFREC.DOC ON JUNE L,1 9 9 0 AT 7: ,r4 P. M. ENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 1 u\ Jr-r— I at. 24TH S ST. .)4 a;©+; t- U t 7 HONEY CREEK PRELIMI ARY PLANNED 0 UNIT DEVELOPMENT A' ESS, AND i'i1Jii1 l I • ';r a' 1posi fq44: FINAL ACTION ON PR It, PROPOSAL CONSISTS OF 72 MU I T FAMILY . PP rz- r----'. r C,.andl.r cd SOmm (A w. -.tr7 ny z F UNITS ON 12,23 AC E. LOCATED rjCrj NORTH OF JEFFERS VENUE NE 150 F AND EAST OF NE218s,.._ o;.. off STREET, ao3I n n, 19 ..i. WIT.17.1 leiri,Y --,W i G i,.a,[ w,,. -}!,, r , „ FILE NO. PPLD-01 -84 i o I x I-. J 4 t` a yP,wr ., 's' • F 1 t e.J: lit Y 6 ( J•; a' o^ l . ^ 3a '. a G N , rO O Narl,sch A . YS P ? a °, ,•'2"4.' .-,*''t' 2 ,, r'i I 8 ^ • u ct: , t. ./ Ott .•' Ytf I tR a, ' V w 7.\ , A..::....:.. a c, O mo 5andro J.Mlllcr I ' I 1 7 1.21Ac. l 0 TRAC 5 5 t-„?a(2b.,ro t E2 I !,„,'„ nil, O .O fi. `' IE.IeNtln s.cAwe5ar 1.Z Nor1 Highlands 05A... r,— GT S8I a a E D LSAT mplete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 Wang ! the reovale, u4iiaTion, tidesyruciioiiisisrn ' or conc ealmnt of this noce demeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING fi I 41 r' q,q HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THE ABOVE NOTICE WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE OR MORE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AND TWO COPIES WERE POSTED '.T THE RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVENUE S. , RENTON, WA ON DATE OF S ii.SCRIP FAD AND swat : To BEFORE N E y ° 18 qc SIGNED Midi Notaryi-. 5licia anti ( the tate of Washington, residin7 r: Nl Viotti) 06" 4" AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 50640 Kathleen Hoover being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published NOTICEITYOFOPUBLIC THOEARING in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King BY County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal RENTON CITY COUNCIL HERthe newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Rentonl CitylSCouCouncil has fixeBYd Nhethat4th day King County. of June, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Build- ing,Wash- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition t n, asMilltheA time South, Renton, forington,time and place for a public Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition and not in hearing to consider the following: supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Accept testimony on access to the Hon- ey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Devel- during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Pith 1 i r P opment (PPUD), and consider final action on the PPUD. The proposal consists of 72 Notice. of Public Hearing) R4162 multifamily units on 12.23 acres located north of Jefferson Avenue NE and east of NE 21st Street (PPUD-105-84). was published on May 18, 199 0 Any and all interested persons are invit- ed to be present to voice approval, disap- proval or opinions on same. City of Renton The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Marilyn J. Petersen, CMC sum Of$19 , 95 Cirk Published in the Valley Daily News le on May 18, 1990. Acct. #50640. R4162 14ttatilAlaC1-15 )-(A-/' Subscribed and sworn before me this 9 s t day oYM a y 19 9 0 ry Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised Q89 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 4th day of June, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Accept testimony on access to the Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD), and consider final action on the PPUD. The proposal consists of 72 multifamily units on 12.23 acres located north of Jefferson Avenue NE and east of NE 21st Street (PPUD-015-84). Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Marilyn . ersen, CMC City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION: May 18, 1990 Valley Daily News Account #50640 INTERESTED PARTIES - HONEY CREEK Skip Jacobson 5/1 13701 SE Allen Road Bellevue 98006 Marilyn: Bob Tomberg Larry Springer said that these 5611 - 119th SE, #2 are the names you will need. Bellevue 98006 He will be contacting you to discuss and schedule the Mitch Murray public meeting. 2813 NE 23rd Place Renton 98056 Billie Randy Corman 2216 Harrington Place NE Renton 98056 Mick Santa 5808 - 111th Place SE Bellevue 98006 Mike Hanis 3900 E. Valley Highway, Suite 203 Renton 98055 NOTICE RENTON CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 4 , 1990 AT 7:30 P. M. ENTOINN MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 1ccDi ^ 24TH ST.. a _ 81; U t7 - HONEY CREEK PRELIMI ARY PLANNED Pia (t ='a:2 1 e' 1 .aAli per+ UNIT DEVELOPMENT A( I ESS, AND 23Ro P`. FINAL ACTION ON P' IN. PROPOSAL r i•V la is . A ag . x_ 5T:_ f CONSISTS OF 72 MUIT FAMILY . IF r. r.u.""a i.r 0 II I' '- 1 __ ®- I UNITS ON 12,23 ACE'. LOCATED l , . .^ non ,e, ,-„, t I l ,, ,l .,. l NORTH OF JEFFERSON AVENUE NE p. AND EAST OF NE 215T1 STREET[ ll` • 5 '.- "_ NE."-'2!'S ---s-r,-_- .. Y ,r. r ,6' aR' v Lw F1 1 , / • a{M r ' Ll w: v'•etl IY,1 Ixl tl 1 t A . x Zlti:/1 "4fz."1M,ri u - , „4 n5 471 i., l,,t . C',,.:-- FILE NO. PPUD-01 84 x[[ c. F [ ii x : a- I)— g< _, r. J • W Chaster J. rt•.} y z y o'C.E +O4^/ 1 Y r`:." I2 1. 3's. A H.,,,.ck 4 1 Y I) ., 1 G\ L` Iu `Ny,<' r"+ . iJ ^ d Y p yo .j` h la,._ C t...• ia. n[.[ a. PO , x 4 4' e • W .• •, 4t 7 J :, .' O-` ,, ' N O °9 5 0, Sondra J.Miller 5 CL7k IiI \ ' c. i \ TRAC tiIIOtt1111 t."'" .. a;..:'. j, 0.74Ac. 1.1.01 L. ` Z Nort i, Highlands ry4*'" Mk. n S, CT 5 B' j sjNaC T r ee IATH complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 inc removai, mu*iiaiion, ciesttruc.eQiii a r n u n or concealment of this notice is a mis- demeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. CERTIFICATION PosItiv-65 go go 3 LrIe, Av. Ki (fig,d kit NE, 3 ,JbIt vvK ( cteld 'l1 Alf Oar r,,l 1 i,? et , 0 5 la (r ,,,f 4or r,•r, NG 6.III l air-m(14r\ AJC 7. `_ 13 a ( rI„ 0.1 FL Z 6 b2,NC ;-31 d 0 11- 9 • ;-bf3 N6 2— 41 h ,f 1D 26O C 2-3rd rt- fDS7 O l foe P /e 95 IA) AY /50 o 6041 CQ wy I?:d` may f3 • / 5 " AU S 5 9 &o . f2V 95- 6 we , Richard James te f i rv,) COMMERCIAL PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON FAX TRANSMITTAL SHEET JUN 1 5 1990 RECEIVED RICHARD JAMES COMMERCIAL 11400 S. E. 6th Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 206) 454-7900 FAX NUMBER: (206) 451-8772 DATE:4 1. '9(9 0 NUMBER OF AGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) : 41/ SENT FROM: .S , C o Ls ei SENDING TO: S D_,°J, dame e9 v01v C,• mpany eparr men RECEIVER'S FAX NUMBER: 3 RECEIVER'S PHONE NUMBER: COMMENTS: 11400 S.E.6TH ST,,SUITE 101 BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 208)454.790 A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Continued) Our No. 179349 Your No. 7430-LH PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 4 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 19' 25" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 445 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 8'29" WEST 181. 55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 8' 29" WEST 98. 20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 51 '31" EAST 232. 97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 32 DEGREES 08'29" WEST 499. 09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08'29" WEST 169 .83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 9 DEGREES 08'29" WEST 104 .29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 38'29" WEST 343 . 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, BEING SOUTH 0 DEGREES 51'31" WEST 47. 27 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OP THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4 ; THENCE EAST 185. 43 FEET; THENCE NORTH TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF SOUTHEAST 97TH STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 120TH PLACE SOUTHEAST; THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG SAID MARGIN TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE FLAT OF PARADISE ESTATES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 95 OF PLATS, PAGE 93 , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PLAT; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 15' 36" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PLAT 555. 64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 16'00" WEST 392 .7 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 17 '00" EAST 555. 64 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SA D SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 16' 00" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE 1, 513 .75 FEET '0 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO KNOWN AS LOT A OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 585109) . PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SEC ION PAGE 2 A. L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Continued) Our No. 179349 Your No. 7430-LH 4 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 19'25" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 445 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 8'29" WEST 181. 55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 8'29" WEST 98 . 20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 51'31" EAST 232 . 97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 32 DEGREES 08'29" WEST 499.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 08'29" WEST 169.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 9 DEGREES 08'29" WEST 104 . 29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 38'29" WEST 343 . 30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, BEING SOUTH 0 DEGREES 51' 31" WEST 47. 27 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 51'31" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 1169.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 19' 25" 843 .90 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO KNOWN AS LOT B OF KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 585109 . ) PAGE 3 r" 0 CHIC.=;G TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1800 COLUMN C=NTEER, 701 FIFTH AVE.. 5c.A L" ,':A 98104 12C-5) 623-566 1 l 1 .`rS• • rl. TIn i. 11 L Lull it 1 x 'j 1 I 411.11.14at / r 1 I f. Ampryr...--44aL LI..4.—.- s: LC;° V\ qo i' tM31 I' tL N. 1...rl i e°' 1' N\ r ly na 1• •‘t+ "•' -••' 1CQ. i 1 y i . . L 11. ...,••• , t. ! M • .. ta.'47.---e***..; t a., I t . . -( 6r., 1 1. 7, : iV J• ,` ri.i r 1 1, ...... 1 TO: UTILITIES DATE: FFOM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT:Tr WARING !InTTCE POSTTN!; P1,1ase furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition Map Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants Verify Content PLEASE SEE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO POSTING FOR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS THANK YOU! Requested by: '''1RII YN PFTFRSFN av 14: 1990 enton City Council Minutes Page 143 Councilman Edwards suggested that staff study the problem and possibly arrive at a solution for view protection. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Following discussion, Council asked that Administration review the project and report back to Council next week and include a review by the City Attorney's office. Also, the report should include zoning requirements and regulations for setbacks. Councilman Tanner stated that the project would not be subject to future action or ordinance. He did not want to establish any false hopes for the concerned parties. Upon Council inquiry as to whether there is a 14-day appeal period after a permit is issued for single family residence or any recourse for a neighbor, Assistant City Attorney Fontes responded that an appeal may be filed only if the building is being built contrary to the original plans or violates fire or building codes. There was further Council inquiry regarding height of trees/vegetation on City right-of-way or City property. Administration will report back to Council. Citizen Comment: Webb - Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, cited the hearing examiner's Boeing FEIS Appeal report regarding the Boeing FEIS and disagreed with the report. He stated that the FEIS is flawed, the mitigation measures inadequate, and the citizens did not receive the rights they were intended or the protection they deserve. For the record, Assistant City Attorney Fontes stated that the report from the office of the hearing examiner dated 5/11/90, did not match the report read by Mr. Webb. Citizen Comment: Earl Westlund, 1420 NW Gilman Boulevard, Suite 2351, Issaquah, President Westlund - Property of Custom Showcase Builders, Incorporated, builder of home next door to Ms. View Obstruction Bergeron's home, explained that the front part of the house is a single story home, and the second story is set back 16 feet. The major interference will be the roof that is on the front of the house, and he has attempted to preserve as much of the view as possible in developing the custom plans. He requested that any correspondence on this matter be forwarded to him. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. At Council request, items 6.c., Mayor's reappointment to Park Board and item 6.d., Mayor's reappointment to Library Board, were removed for separate consideration. Claim: U.S.. West Claim for damages in the amount of $144.25 filed by U.S. West Communications, CL 31- Communications, Room 1811, 1600-7th Avenue, Seattle, for damage to 90 buried cable in the vicinity of 6th and Harrington NE, allegedly caused by a City equipment operator on June 1, 1989 (CL 31-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. PUD: Preliminary, Honey Community Development Department/Planning Division requested Council set Creek, PPUD--015-84, public hearing on June 4, 1990, to consider final action on the access portion Site Access of the Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development, 2200 Jefferson Avenue NE, PPUD 015-84. Council set public hearing for June 4, 1990. Court Case: B&E Court case filed by B & E Financial, Inc., vs. City of Renton, et al, for Financial temporary restraining order to restrain the City of Renton from refusing to issue building permit upon payment of outstanding permit fees for Parker Planned Unit Development, located at SE Royal Hills Drive, FPUD 024-85. Refer to City Attorney. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Appointment: Park Board Mayor Clymer reappointed Joan Moffatt, 3709 Meadow Avenue North, Renton, to the Park Board for a four-year term effective to June 1, 1994. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: 6, b. SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: May 14 , 1990 Dept/Div/Board. .Community Development Staff Contact. . .Larry Springer AGENDA STATUS: Consent XXX SUBJECT: Honey Creek Prelim PUD Public Hearing. . Access Only Correspondence. . Ordinance Resolution Old Business. . . . EXHIBITS: New Business. . . . A staff report and recommendation will Study Session. . . be provided in the Council's packet on Other May 31, prior to the public hearing. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Department of APPROVALS: Community Development recommends that the Legal Dept Council conduct a public hearing on June 4th Finance Dept. . . . to consider final action on the access Other portion of the PPUD. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required. . . None Transfer/Amendment. . Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated. . . SUMMARY OF ACTION: In light of the complexity of this project, the length of time since it was initiated, and the revisions that have been proposed recently, staffrecommends that Council re-hear this proposal prior to taking final action on the access portion of the project. All of the outstanding issues have been discussed and presumably resolved by Planning and Development Committee at one time or another. The hearing will allow those Council members who are not familiar with the project to understand what is being proposed, and give the public one final opportunity to provide testimony. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: 6, b. r SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: May 14 , 1990 Dept/Div/Board. .Community Development Staff Contact. . .Larry Springer AGENDA STATUS: Consent XXX SUBJECT: Honey Creek Prelim PUD Public Hearing. . Access Only Correspondence. . Ordinance Resolution Old Business. . . . EXHIBITS: New Business. . . . A staff report and recommendation will Study Session. . . be provided in the Council's packet on Other May 31, prior to the public hearing. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Department of APPROVALS: Community Development recommends that the Legal Dept Council conduct a public hearing on June 4th Finance Dept. . . . to consider final action on the access Other portion of the PPUD. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required. . . None Transfer/Amendment. . Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated. . . SUMMARY OF ACTION: In light of the complexity of this project, the length of time since it was initiated, and the revisions that have been proposed recently, staffrecommends that Council re-hear this proposal prior to taking final action on the access portion of the project. All of the outstanding issues have been discussed and presumably resolved by Planning and Development Committee at one time or another. The hearing will allow those Council members who are not familiar with the project to understand what is being proposed, and give the public one final opportunity to provide testimony. 4i ® CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Earl Clymer, Mayor Fire Marshal: Glen G. Gordon Chief: A. Lee Wheeler MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1990 TO: Donald Erickson - Zoning Administrator FROM: Glen G. Gordon - Fire Marshal SUBJECT:Honeycreek Fire Department Access Road Off Of Northeast 23rd Street Don: I reviewed the revised proposal for Fire Department access off of Northeast 23rd Street. The revised proposal showing the 18 foot access road into the site off of Northeast 23rd is approved. Any further questions, please let me know. GGG:mbt 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2642 r 0 February 19, 1990 Renton City Council Minutes Page 56 Ordinance #4258 An ordinance was read adopting the 1990 Zoning Map. MOVED BY Zoning: Annual Adoption KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE of Map ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL; ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4259 An ordinance was read adopting the vacating of a portion of N.W. 3rd Street Vacation: VAC-89-003,Storybook Homes; VAC-003-89). MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, NW 3rd Street, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS Sundholm's Addition, READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Storybook Homes Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the following ordinances for first reading: Zoning: Definitions An ordinance was read amending Chapter 31, Zoning Code, of Title IV Numbered in Code Building Regulations) by numbering the definitions. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Legal: Zoning for Adult An ordinance was read amending Sections 4-31-2A and P and Section 4-31- Entertainment 30 of Chapter 31, Zoning Code, of Title IV (Building Regulations) adding definitions and adding a section regulating the location of peep shows, panorams, and places featuring adult entertainment. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke reported that he and Councilman Edwards had attended Streets: Valley a meeting in Olympia regarding the proposed gas tax. He requested that staff Transportation Plan provide Council with a the list of the current projects that are related to the gas tax. Council President Mathews recalled that the six-year plan had been submitted and approved last fall prior to the budget session. Also, the city has applied to the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) for the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in the valley. Valley representatives were discussing this at that meeting in Olympia. The City and Valley submitted this list of projects in tandem. Councilman Zimmerman announced that an agenda bill reporting potential TIB gas tax projects would be forthcoming which proposes that the City of Renton join with two other valley cities to form the South King County Transportation Benefit District. Councilman Stredicke questioned when the report on the Valley Transportation Program would be presented. City Attorney Larry Warren explained that he had sent the ordinance to property owners in the valley. Staff is reviewing the responses at this time and a report will be forthcoming. Vacation: Ordinance MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL Revision REFER THE STREET VACATION POLICY TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND POSSIBLE REVISION. CARRIED. Utility: Honey Cree1c Councilwoman Nelson read a memo from Public Works Director J.,ynn Sewer Line Damage Guttmann regarding the damage to the Honey Creek sewer line as a result of 9oi p the recent storm. The request was to declare the area an emergency and allow the City to identify and secure funding for permanent repairs. The letter advised that Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds are being sought. MOTION BY NELSON, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL DECLARE HONEY CREEK AN EMERGENCY. CARRIED. Police: Officer Councilwoman Nelson thanked Police Officer Eddie Goodman for assisting Commended her staff at her business in downtown Renton late in the evening when the outside door failed to lock. ADMINISTRATIVE Council inquiry of 01/22/90 regarding the legality of using single family REPORT residences as rental units: Memo from Community Development Department Zoning: Single Family reported no restriction in the city using a single-family residence for rental Zone Violation purposes. Citizen Comment: Post - Referred 02/05/90 from George Post regarding deferral bond posted by Victoria Hills FPUD developer of Victoria Hills Phase II for improvements of Benson Road: Community Development Department responded that information regarding the required bond which extends to January 1991 has been provided to Mr. Post. r 4i 0 CITY OF RENTON Nu THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Earl Clymer, Mayor CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: February 19, 1990 TO: Toni Nelson Chair Utility Committee FROM: Ly = ; . ann, Director, Public Works VIA:Mayor E., mer SUBJECT: Storm Da .ge to the Honey Creek Sewer Line In a recent inspection we found considerable erosion in the Honey Creek basin resulting from the January 9th storm. The erosion has undermined and exposed the Honey Creek sewer interceptor line in several locations, creating a need for immediate repairs. Some temporary repairs have been made to keep the sewer line in service, but additional restoration work is necessary to assure the integrity of the line. The situation is serious, another storm could cause the loss of this important sewer line. We have contacted the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to include this restoration work on its list for Federal/State aide. However, until that office is prepared to provide assistance the burden falls on the City to undertake the necessary repairs. I believe the extent of repair and restoration work necessary and the severity of damage warrants immediate action and request that you introduce to Council a motion to declare this situation an emergency. This will allow the Public Works Department to immediately identify and secure funding and to proceed with a negotiated construction contract to provide permanent repairs and relieve the threat to the sewer line. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2586 I I 44itii CITY OF RENTO a> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division January 31, 1990 Mitch Murray 2813 N.E. 23rd Place Renton, WA 98056 RE: Review/Comment on Revised Honey Creek PUD Site Plans File No. PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Murray: We have recently received the revised site plans for the Honey Creek PUD discussed at the December 7th Planning and Development meeting. I would like to meet with you and other interested persons on Thursday, February 8th at 2:00 p.m. in the sixth floor conference room at City Hall to review and discuss the revised plans. If you are unable to attend a meeting on this date and would like to reschedule or if you have any questions, please call myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague at 235-2550. 1 , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning Division DKE:mck:mr cc: Larry Springer Larry Warren 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)2 3 5-2 5 5 0 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 CITY OF RENT NALL ` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM T Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Divi on January 31, 1990 Randy Corman 2216 Harrington Pl, NE Renton, WA 98056 RE: Review/Comment on Revised Honey Creek PUD Site Plans File No. PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Corman: We have recently received the revised site plans for the Honey Creek PUD discussed at the December 7th Planning and Development meeting. I would like to meet with you and other interested persons on Thursday, February 8th at 2:00 p.m. in the sixth floor conference room at City Hall to review and discuss the revised plans. If you are unable to attend a meeting on this date and would like to reschedule or if you have any questions, please call myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague at 235-2550. tncere J Donald K. Erickson, AICP Chief, Current Planning Division DKE:mck:mr cc: Larry Springer Larry Warren 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 CITY of RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division January 18, 1989 Mr. Skip Jacobson 13701 S .E. Allen Road Bellevue, Washington 98006 RE: Honey Creek PUD - PUD Hearing File FPUD-015-86 Dear Mr. Jacobson: This letter places in writing items we have discussed with respect to the upcoming public hearing for the Honey Creek PUD. Our conversations during the past two weeks have focused on the amount of time City staff will require in preparing a complete report to the City Council as well as the timing of the public hearing . With respect to the public hearing, you had originally been trying to obtain a hearing before the City Council on February 5, 1990. However, since you have only recently been able to reach the project architect and will not be ready to submit the plans to the City until next Thursday, January 25th, we agreed the February 5th hearing date is no longer feasible. As we discussed, the specific hearing date depends upon several factors. First, City staff needs sufficient time to review the revised project package to ensure that the information submitted is complete and all concerns raised by the City have been addressed. Following staff's review, there may be revisions you wish to make to the submittal package or staff may have questions requiring additional information. As we discussed, it may be helpful for key staff reviewers to meet with you at the time you propose submitting the revised plan. I will be in touch with you regarding a meeting time next Thursday or Friday (January 25 or 26th) . Second, the interested parties of record need to review the revised plans as arranged or agreed to on December 7 , 1989 , when the Planning and Development Committee last met on the project and the owners made it known that they would like to make revisions to the site plan. This would need to occur as soon as possible once the plans are submitted. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 Finally, the City Council on December 11, 1989, adopted an outline of steps to be followed prior to the Council setting a public hearing on the P.U.D. application. I have attached a copy of the minutes from the meeting for your review. Once we are able to meet and review the revised submittal package, we will be able to establish a timeline for the review of the project by the City Council . I look forward meeting with you next week. If to you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Jeanette Samek-McKague Senior Planner Attachment Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 9 3. While there may be somb non-compliance with the Comprehensive Plan evident on the south boundary, the proposal provides reasonable separation on the west where separately owned, single family zoned and developed uses are located. The proposed R-1 zoning is a continuation of the existing zoning patterns and reasonably complements it. So while the proposed location of the R-2 zoning does not follow strict orthodox land use practices, the consequences of divergence are not really a problem. The location is sufficiently isolated from adjoining properties by it's unique topography to cause little concern about adverse or undue effects of such a district on neighboring property. The plateau lies approximately 75 to 100 feet lower than the southerly properties, thereby creating a discrete environment and neighborhood. 4. While the proposed location for the R-2 district would provide certain density bonuses to the applicant, the zoning does not appear to adversely affect neighboring properties and is compatible with those policies of the Comprehensive Plan which look for topographical barriers to provide buffers between distinct zoning categories. The bonus it may provide the applicant is obviously a trade-off to protect the stream environment, while allowing the applicant reasonable development of private property. Proposed R-1 District 5.The three areas proposed for R-1 zoning appear generally compatible with similar single family designations made in the Comprehensive Plan. But, given the distinct geologic hazard idenitified on the State maps, Class III soils type, which identify the site as very unstable, it may be premature to discuss the easterly side of the stream where the applicant has not proposed any particular development. The proposed PPUD for the westerly acreage permits hazards to be avoided by shifting development. At present, that cannot be said for the easterly R-I zones proposed. Until the applicant can provide geotechnical studies demonstrating the suitablity for development on the steeper areas and even the more gentle plateaus, the zoning should be limited to G-1, the category automatically applied if the site were annexed. There are substantial steep slopes along the eastern edge of Honey Creek within the perimeter of the two proposed R-1 areas, and R-1 zoning under the circumstances is premature. If the site were G-1 instead of classified R-1 as requested, then the zoning would be the same as those areas confined within the steeper Honey Creek ravine, which appears appropriate. When the site's isolation from emergency services is considered it does not seem at all unreasonable to leave the site with G-1 zoning. The possibility for rezoning in the future is not foreclosed and can be considered in light of changed conditions and additional information pertaining to the geology of the site. 6. The last area proposed for R-1 zoning is the portion which wraps around the proposed R-2 district on the west and south. This area is more-or-less "L" shaped. It follows the western and southern property lines of the site. As discussed above in the R-2 analysis, it continues the adjacent western R-1 district onto the subject site and acts to buffer the less intense single family uses to the west from the proposed R-2 zone. This area also marks that portion of the site which makes the transition from the Highlands relatively level topography to the steep topography adjacent to Honey Creek. These are the slopes above the proposed R-2 zone. 7.This R-1 zoning appears generally compatible with the designation in the Comprehensive Plan and again, it continues the existing single family zoning pattern west of the site to the site. Proposed G-1 District 8. The G-1 zoning proposed for the Honey Creek stream course and ravine system appears appropriate. Under current zoning practice in the City, G-1 provides the least intense residential density criterium of any zoning district. It would be compatible with the other proposed districts for the subject site, namely R-1 and R-2. As proposed, it would serve to protect those areas designated greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan, and in that regard, it is quite compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. The request actually would coincide with the zoning the site would attain, if the Council took no prior action, since the property would automatically enter the City with G-1 zoning. As indicated above, this G-1 zoning would be contiguous with the G-1 zoning which the recommendation to deny the easterly R-1 districts would create. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 10 PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 9. The development of the subject site as a PUD appears to servo the public use and interest. The unique topography and environment of the subject site can only be enhanced by clustering and designing around the steep slopes and Honey Creek. The 72 units would not produce substantially more traffic than a single family neighborhood. The topographical isolation would appear sufficient to avoid any adverse impacts from incompatible housing types or densities on adjoining properties. At this stage the applicant has not provided a definitive plan for housing typos, only a schematic proposal as is required for Preliminary PUDs. The housing would be clustered and encircle the level westerly plateau, which would be left for open space purposes. Two story stacked flats would be located along the eastern portion of the site while townhouse units would be located near the southwest corner of the site closer to the developed o its Tho.4ala appear a reasonable approach and should be ap rovid. Final plans would have to be Zi5rirddrailiFd and provide the requisite open space, recreation and building details. 10. The issue of slope stability cannot be ignored. While the site seems suitable from a land use perspective for a PUD of 72 units, the geol0 ll...nderDinnino&nf h e sitg... could conceivably modify_ thlief. ,LWiTh the submission of the Final PUDtheapplicantwillhavetopresentadetailedgeotechnicalanalysispreparedby independent engineers selected with the approval of both the Building and Zoning and the Public Works Departments. The report shall Include but not be limited to`" information regarding: site stability/slope integrity: preservation on the ravine and stream close to their current state: long term implications of development on rosion potential: geologic hazard including earthquake analysis: site preparation nd restoration: and building techniques. 11. The PUD appears to present a reasonable method of developing an environmentally sensitive site, permits the applicant reasonable use of the site, which is private property, and appears_to protect the fragile environment rThe applicant shout — required to provide a sTope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is over sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowners/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. ACCESS 12. The access concerns of residents remain oven with the scaling down of the proposal. It is not just the increased population of the subject proposal, but the creation of a new defecto through street - the connection of Jefferson and 21st which raises many concerns. The streets surrounding the subject site are not collector roads, and in their current state should not be utilized as such. The connection of Jefferson to Kirkland as .a through street will provide a loss circuitous access from the Sunset area to the west and I-405. While the small residential neighborhood now serves as such a link, its narrow, partially paved streets should not be made more attractive by a clear cross town route. Without substantial upgrading of roads which require width improvements, property acquisition and surface upgrading, the proposed access is inappropriate. It might still be inappropriate even with upgrading due to its effects on the residents along 21st, Harrington P1, and 23rd, since these streets were never intended to carry through traffic, and homes are located closer to the street than would normally be the case along collector streets. 13. with the information presented, this Office is not convinced that the through connection of Jefferson/21st would serve the public use and interest. As a matter of fact the opposite appears true, it is not in the public interest. While it is obvious that the inclusion of the roadway appropriately named Devils Elbow into the City was purposely avoided to avoid maintenance responsibilities, access, at least secondary access to the subject site if it is really needed at all, could be via this route. It was the access method proposed at the annexation hearings before the City Council and remained the applicant's original choice until the ERC review, and the ERC review did not have the benefit of public input. Conflicting figures submitted regarding potential road grade do not weigh more heavily for one method over the other. The grades appear comparable. Honey Creek Associates R-014-84 & PPUD 015-84 January 17, 1986 Page 8 22. The proposal for the rezoning has not changed and includes property on both sides of Honey Creek. The applicant proposes reclassifying approximately 6.0 acres to R-2; approximately 29 acres to R-1 and approximately 12.7 acres to G-1. (See attached map). The R-2 property would be located on the southwestern plateau approximately 75 feet below the surrounding grade, approximately 190 feet north of the south property line, and approximately 190 foot oast of the west property line. Three separate areas are proposed for R-1 zoning. One of the R-1 districts proposed by the applicant would be approximately 'L' shaped. It is the property at the extreme southwest corner of the subject site and would be bounded by R-1 zoning on the west and R-2 zoning on the south. That district would be approximately 8.06 acres. The other proposed R-1 districts would be located on the east side of Honey Creek. One area would be along the north end of the subject site and would be approximately 16.14 acres. The other R-1 zone would be along the eastern perimeter of the subject site and would be approximately 4.81 acres. The G-1 zone proposed by the applicant would include the stream bed of Honey Creek together with a largo percentage of the steep side hills and ravines above Honey Creek, and tributary ravines. 23. No population projections or school age student projections were made for the subject proposal by staff. The project with its 72 units would generate an estimated 430 vehicle trips per day. Comparisons were drawn indicating that the development of approximately 43 single family homes, the potential under single family zoning on this site, would generate a similar amount of traffic. 24. The site is apparently subject to slides. Slides have occurred while the sewer line was being installed in the creek bed, and other slides and sloughs have occurred in the past along the steep walls above Honey Creek, both on and off the subject site. The soils are sandy soils of Class III, making the site quite susceptible to erosion, earthquake and landslide damage. 25. The proposed emergency access at N.E. 23rd Street has a proposed width of 12 feet, whereas the required minimum standard is 20 feet. Authority to waive the requirement was not shown. CONCLUSIONS REZONE 1.The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest, it will not impair the public health, safety and welfare and in addition, complies with at least one of the three criteria found in Section 4-3010, which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been a material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. While the map and some policy elements of the Comprehensive Plan do not entirely justify the requested zoning, the topographic isolation of the subject site would appear to support portions of the request. The potential soils' problems would appear to require additional information for those portions of the site not part of the proposed PPUD. Proposed R-2 District 2. The area that has been proposed for R-2 zoning does not appear to be located in the area strictly designated for low density multi-family dwelling units per the Comprehensive Plan. While the Comprehensive Plan designates the southern area of the subject site for duplex-type housing stock, the area proposed is approximately 200 feet north of the southern property lino. The major rationale in the Comprehensive Plan would appear to be that the area so designated is a continuation of existing zoning patterns, that is, an R-2 zoning district is located immediately south of the subject site. As proposed,' the rezone is some 200 feet north of the existing R-2 zone, and in fact, separated from it by proposed R-1 zoning. The request would carve out a new and independent R-2 zone in the midst of single family and extremely low density single family zoning. But on the whole, this does not seem unreasonable given the topographical separation of the various areas. 0 CITY OF RENTON LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division PLANNING DIVISION January 4, 1990 CITY OF RENTON Mr. Skip Jacobson JAN 81990 13701 S.E. Allen Road GVEBellevue, WA 98006 RECEIVED Subject: Honey Creek PUD - Emergency Access Dear Mr. Jacobson: Please be advised we have reviewed the proposed emergency access plan on N.E. 23rd Street submitted to the City in the last week of December, 1989. As you are aware, there are only twenty feet of right-of-way available for the access and the roadway width is required by ordinance to be twenty feet. The slope of the rockery as proposed, only leaves fifteen feet of roadway width, which is unacceptable. We would suggest that you investigate a vertical concrete retaining wall with the following general configuration. Fence may be needed for safety 1 -- r__ Use curbing to direct drainage It was our understanding in the last Council Sub-Committee meeting (12-7-89) , that you could build a retaining facility that would not use up more than eighteen inches of roadway. Please reevaluate the emergency access and resubmit a proposal that we can recommend and support to the City Council. Very truly yours, 4F. GaryA. Norris, P.E. Transportation Systems Manager CEM:ps cc: Larry Springer, Planning Department Glen G. Gordon, Fire Department Don Erickson, Comm. Development CEM268 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 4. OF RE1, 0 © oA. OFFICE of the CITY CLERK 200 Mill Avenue South z ..IL A o Renton, Washington 98055 0, 9gTED SEPT , eEP hk:a4 illaKGU- at... G.10• igti sE . •L b rctl— i 14 A el 80cl, Mick Santa 4444 Issaquah-Pine Lake Road Issaquah, WA 98027 NOT DELIVERABLE r'W AS ADORE SED 6861 UNABLE TO4ORWARU fN 11:111L111liiii11i1111:111:111:11:1:1il:iilililliilRETURNTOWRITER: , l jd Q N i 4. 0 CITY OF RENTON LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 20, 1989 Bob Tomberg 5611 119th SE, #2 Bellevue, Washington 98006 RE: Honey Creek Associates R-014-84; PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Tomberg: At its abbreviated meeting of December 11, 1989, the Renton City Council adopted the attached Planning and Development Committee report concerning the Honey Creek PUD. If you have further questions, please contact the current Planning office at 235-2550, or feel free to contact this office. Yours truly, ar—Jee—r cc}eyiii0:0-t) Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk MEM:rjs Enclosure cc: Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Facelmllat 1 nal 91K-9X11 PhRf irs OF REC01.0 John L. Hendrickson BobTombergLucas, Glase,, Sherman & Hendrickson S 119th SE, Honeywell Center, Suite 505 Bellell 119th WA2600- 108th Avenue NE 98006 Bellevue, WA 98004 Roger Green 9818 124th AvenueSEEvaJeanHyleyRenton, WA G t Iluseland 'Educational Trust Fund 98055 1224 South 211th Street Curtis J. Seattle; WA p 1 Martin 3728 Park Avenue N . Renton, WA98055MitchMurray 2813 NE 23rd Place GregDienerRenton, WA 98056 Johnson Braund Design Group Robert & William Kobayash 304 Main Avenue South Renton, WA980552707NE125th j Seattle, WA 98125 Mel Easter, Architect Johnson. Braund DesianCroupiiThomasA. Johnson, AIA 304 Main AvenueSouthJohnsonBraundDesignGroupRenton, WA 98055304MainAvenueS. , Suite200Renton, WA 98055 Lorraine Damman 2809 NE 23rdPlaceBobLemlyRenton, WA 98056 6005 Hazlewood Drive SE Bellevue, WA OI Mr. & Mrs. Wayne :Oder 2123 Harrington Plie NE i T • D . Malmoe Renton, WA 98056 12105 SE 96th Place Renton, WA 98056 Kathleen Gormley 2820 NE 23rd Plae• Amos Huseland Renton, Wq 1916 Edmonds Avenue NE 9800. s Renton, WA 98056 1Susani,q' od'ct. C 2807 NE 21st Street S 5 ee Russell Bergeron 130 Renton, WA 98056 Mick Santa ttei A. /5eI ct S 414444Issaquah-pine Lake Road Issaquah, WA 98027 d O (( s-f-r F{- (}^ee Chuck Youngquist laKaPOlS1 Yld,'QnC `((ptQy 1 12110 SE 96th Renton, WA 98055 Randy Cornun Mr. Visick 2216 llarrilgton P1. NE Renton, WA 98056, iJ `— 5 12405 SE 98th Street i, Renton, WA 98055 Alex D. MacLachlan e . Pat Sado Bruch & Vedrich, Incr 9902 126th Avenue SE 7905 159th Place NE n"''('„' WA: nRnr;I; Redmond, WA 98052 4i ® CITY OF RENTON LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk December 20, 1989 Mick Santa 4444 Issaquah-Pine Lake Road Issaquah, Washington 98027 RE: Honey Creek Associates R-014-84; PPUD-15-84 Dear Mr. Santa: At its abbreviated meeting of December 11, 1989, the Renton City Council adopted the attached Planning and Development Committee report concerning the Honey Creek PUD. If you have further questions, please contact the current Planning office at 235-2550, or feel free to contact this office. Yours truly, Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk MEM:rjs Enclosure cc: Parties of Record 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 FAnelmlln /9AR) 99R-9R/4 1 PARTIES OF RECUicv John L. Hendrickson Bob Tomberg 2 Lucas, Glase,, Sherman & Hendrickson 5611 119th SE,Honeywell Center, Suite 505 Bellevue, WA98006600- 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 RogerGreena 9818 124th AvenueSEEvaJeanHyleyRentonWA t Iluseland 'Educational Trust Fund 98055 1224 South 211th Street Curtis J. MartinSeattle', WA 04*1 3728 Park Avenue N . Renton, WA98055MitchMurray 2813 NE 23rd Place GregDienerRenton, WA 98056 Johnson Braund Design Group Robert & William Kobayash 304 Main Avenue South 2707 NE 125th Renton, WA 98055 Seattle, WA 98125 Mel Easter, Architect Johnson BraundDesignOroupThomasA. Johnson, AIA 304 Main AvenueSouthJohnsonBraundDesignGroupRenton, WA 98055304MainAvenueS . , Suite200Renton, WA 98055 Lorraine Damman 2809 NE 23rdPlaceBobLemlyRenton, WA 980566005HazlewoodDriveSE r Bellevue, WA I Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Oder 2123 Harrington Plee NE Renton, WA 98056 T• B . Malmoe 12105 SE 96th Place i • Renton, WA 98056 Kathleen. Gormley 2820 NE 23rd Plae• Amos Huseland Renton, WA 9800 1916 Edmonds Avenue NE Renton, WA 98056 QQISuSQIJnrOdekti1RussellBergeronL130 2807 NE 21st Street 3 5 o'tfSr e_I Renton, WA 98056 c°`` 1 i.. Mick Santa S` tey A. 145eta•,d4444Issaquah-Pine Lake Road nnIssaquah, WA 98027 OD G() 5-r'l S Y` tree Chuck Youngquist ra`0. P lt-1nq'a,cL o y 12110SE 96th r Renton, WA 98055 Randy Corm r Mr. Visick 2216 Harrington P1. NE // Renton, WA 98056. l-//`-` 1 12405 SE 98th Street Renton, WA 98055 Alex D. MacLachlan Bruch & Vedrich, IncPatSado 7905 159th PlaceNE9902126thAvenueSE n,.+n,nr, IVA; ngnt;': Redmond, WA 98052 td$' CITY OF RENTON Co Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney oil Daniel Kellogg - Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Terence Lynch - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys 4 /0/ December 13, 1989 X) On /8/1 TO: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator f 4vhe 41FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney 40 RE: Honey Creek PUD Dear Don: I,(,hl' ,liv f. I was recently out with some employees of the Parks Department 4iviewingpropertylocatedalongHoneyCreek. They indicated to me that the developer on the Honey Creek PUD had spoken with them. Apparently the developer has agreed to dedicate the stream and property on either side of the stream to the Parks Department for use as a trail corridor. As I understand it, at least one bank is `y'"2% already burdened with a sewer line easement. Since your . department is responsible for drafting the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation on the PPUD, I would suggest that you erme whwthh r the noPt arsuksc h Da rdtmantt on andh outd e be a rq emd of the preliminary planned unit develop ept. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor I / t/47 John Webley 4617\ 5 OJ O7' C zf-l41 JA8 .50 :50 . C. 5 re i,e, 1,1, ate G s Ate 9 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON TO: Renton City Council DEC 1 21989 FROM: Planning and Development Committee RECEIVED RE: Honey Creek PUD The committee met twice on the Honey .Creek PUD, with the last meeting being held on December 7 , 1989 . The committee was to meet on the access problems concerning the project, particularly the inability to expand N.E . 23rd to a full city street. The committee was to assess alternative street plans . The committee was presented with the following street plan which the developer has agreed to: Emergency Access . The city owns twenty feet of right-of-way on the extension of N.E. 23rd. The fire department has indicated that that is sufficient right-of-way to build emergency access . There are two reasons why twenty feet of paved surface are not necessary. First, the twenty feet of paved surface normally anticipates two-way traffic . There will be one-way traffic only. Second, there will be no structures adjacent to the twenty foot emergency access so there will be no need for the fire department to stop its vehicle and set it up to fight fires , an additional reason why twenty foot access is normally desirable. For these reasons, there is more than adequate right-of- way available with twenty feet, even if the developer is required to build retaining walls . Street Improvements : 1 . The developer will improve the road on its project to city standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots . It is anticipated that the road will be dedicated to the city. g c- 9-eet 40,5 /t EGG 2 . The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E . , as follows : a. Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. b. Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E . which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors . 1 Planning and Development Committee Report Honey Creek PUD 3 . The developer will install the following school safety improvements : a. A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E . with appropriate signing should be required. b . Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue N.E. , south side, from Jefferson Avenue N.E . to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. The developer has indicated that it wishes to replace several of the buildings on the project and the staff has indicated that it believes that this is a major modification to the PUD. The Planning and Development Committee believes that the project has gone through so many changes and the council has received so much information that a full compilation of what has occurred needs to be undertaken . Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council recommends as follows : 11 . A staff report shall be prepared setting forth the factual background of this PPUD and establishing findings of fact, conclusions, and a proposed decision. The format used shall be essentially that used by the hearing examiner. 2 . The staff ' s proposal will be tendered to the city council and the council will establish a public hearing date on the modifications to the PUD and the proposed changes to the traffic plan. 3 . The staff report will be presented to the hearing examiner at the same time it is presented to the city council . The hearing examiner shall have two weeks to review the report for completeness and accuracy and make recommendations to the city council, if any, for additions, corrections, or deletions to the proposed staff report. DATED: December 11 , 1989 . Reed, Chairman lU/l(-Ctll ` C 1l O.itt. Nancy Mathews c0541 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler LJW:as . CITY8 : 11 . 2 December 11. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 339 Planning: Zoning Code Planning Division/Community Development submitted request for amendment Amendment, Parking and to Zoning Code Chapter 4-22, Parking and Loading, to modify off-site Loading parking standards and allow non-commercial parking lots to be located up to 800 feet from the building they serve with applicable conditions. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report Utilities Committee recommending Council concurrence in the recommendation of the Public CAG: 89-074, Works Department to accept the bid of Coastal Tank Cleaning, Inc. in the Underground Fuel amount of $81,125.80 for the Underground Fuel Storage Tank Removal Storage Tank Removal project. The Engineer's estimate for the project is $75,237.60. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the contract documents. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. LID: 335, Sierra Heights Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report regarding Sewer Improvements Local Improvement District No. 335, Sierra Heights sewer improvements referred 3/13/89). The Utilities Committee met with staff to discuss options for sanitary sewer service in the Sierra Heights community which annexed in June, 1987. Working with one sewer design configuration to serve the annexed area, staff explored five LID funding options that featured different service areas allowable connections), including service to properties located outside the annexation area. The preliminary LID cost estimates for a typical 8,400 square foot lot ranged from $13,500 for the basic annexed area to $6,200 if all properties in the service area (e.g. those adjacent to the sewer line) were assessed. The service area includes properties in the county that could connect to the sewer line and share in the assessment if approved by the King County Boundary Review Board and the City Council. The alternative for those residents outside the City would be a latecomer charge when connecting to the sewer at a future date. The Public Works Department recommended the following steps to further determine the interest and support for an LID to provide sewer service: 1. To discuss with key community representatives the need and level of support for a sewer LID; 2. To perform a postcard poll of the residents in the service area in January, 1990; and 3. Report to Committee the results of the community response. The Committee concurred in the recommendation and requested that staff review the questionnaire with the Committee prior to mailing. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Edwards presented a report Committee recommending Council concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Greg Appointment: Municipal Murray, 253-129th Avenue NE, Bellevue, to the Municipal Arts Commission Arts Commission for a three-year term beginning 12/31/89 and expiring 12/31/92. Mr. Murray is active in the Renton community through the Imperials Music and Youth Organization, 2003 Maple Valley Highway, Suite 213, Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL CUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Development Committee regarding the Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development. The PUD: Preliminary. Honey Committee met twice on the matter with the last meeting being held on Creek. PPUD-015-84 12/7/89. The purpose of the meeting was to review the access problems concerning the project, particularly the inability to expand NE 23rd Street to a full City street, and assess alternate street plans. The Committee was presented with the following street plan, to which the developer has agreed: EMERGENCY ACCESS: The City owns twenty feet of right-of-way on the extension of NE 23rd. The Fire Department has indicated that is sufficient right-of-way to build emergency access. There are two reasons why twenty feet of paved surface are not necessary. First, the twenty feet of paved surface normally anticipates two-way traffic. There will be one-way traffic only. Second, there will be no structures adjacent to the twenty foot emergency access so j • Y December 11, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 340 there will be no need for the Fire Department to stop its vehicle and set it up to fight fires, an additional reason why twenty foot access is normally desirable. For these reasons, there is more than adequate right-of-way available with twenty feet, even if the developer is required to build retaining walls. STREET IMPROVEMENTS: 1. The developer will improve the road on its project to the city standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots. It is anticipated that the road will be dedicated to the city. Sidewalks will be installed only on one side of the street. 2. The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue NE from subject site to Harrington Avenue NE, as follows: a. Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. b. Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue NE and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue NE which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. 3. The developer will install the following school safety improvements: a. A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue NE on the west side of Jefferson Avenue NE with appropriate signing should be required. b. Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Harrington Avenue NE, south side, from Jefferson Avenue NE to the Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. The developer has indicated that he wishes to replace several of the buildings on the project and the staff has indicated that it believes that this is a major modification to the PUD. The Planning and Development Committee believes that the project has gone through so many changes and the Council has received so much information that a full compilation of what has occurred needs to be undertaken. Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council recommends as follows: 1. A staff report shall be prepared setting forth the factual background of this PPUD and establishing findings of fact, conclusions and a proposed decision. The format used shall be essentially that used by the hearing examiner. 2. The staffs proposal will be tendered to the City Council and the Council will establish a public hearing date on the modifications to the PUD and the proposed changes to the traffic plan. 3. The staff report will be presented to the hearing examiner at the same time it is presented to the City Council. The hearing examiner shall have two weeks to review the report for completeness and accuracy and make recommendations to the City Council, if any, for additions, corrections, or deletions to the proposed staff report. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Upon inquiry, Chairman Reed reported that notice of the public hearing will be posted in the vicinity of the site and published in the local newspaper as required by law. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Edwards presented the following Committee ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4253 An ordinance was read amending Sections 8-309, 8-715, 8-1333, and 8-1431 Utility Rates of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of City Code relating to water and sewer charges, and amending the qualifying income level for certain senior citizen and/or disability rates for water, sewer, garbage, and storm drainage, based on the current percentage increase in social security benefits. MOVED BY EDWARDS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. For the record, Councilman Stredicke noted a cost of living increase of 4.4%, and questioned the percentage of the rate increase. Administrative Assistant McFall reported that although rates vary, the overall impact of the increase will be about 14.5%. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, ZIMMERMAN, EDWARDS, NELSON, MATHEWS, AND REED. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Honey Creek PUD The committee met twice on the Honey Creek PUD, with the last meeting being held on December 7 , 1989 . The committee was to meet on the access problems concerning the project, particularly the inability to expand N.E . 23rd to a full city street. The committee was to assess alternative street plans . The committee was presented with the following street plan which the developer has agreed to: Emergency Access . The city owns twenty feet of right-of-way on the extension of N.E . 23rd. The fire department has indicated that that is sufficient right-of-way to build emergency access . There are two reasons why twenty feet of paved surface are not necessary. First, the twenty feet of paved surface normally anticipates two-way traffic . There will be one-way traffic only. Second, there will be no structures adjacent to the twenty foot emergency access so there will be no need for the fire department to stop its vehicle and set it up to fight fires , an additional reason why twenty foot access is normally desirable . For these reasons, there is more than adequate right-of- way available with twenty feet, even if the developer is required to build retaining walls . Street Improvements : 1 . The developer will improve the road on its project to city standards from the main entrance northward and just beyond the hairpin turn to the point at which the road turns into parking lots . It is anticipated that the road will be dedicated to the city. t -eet(6G°'AC.-li )- 914- 2 . The developer will improve the off-site roadway, Jefferson Avenue N.E. from subject site to Harrington Avenue N.E. , as follows : a. Provide new street construction to city standards which will include but not be limited to curbs , gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. b. Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Avenue N.E . which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors . 1 iijr UZ,1,, + ''ram "4» ! . r `y:'ti "44' V, 1r0i0i`'i earyr.,,.. '_ .. Planning and Development Committee Report Honey Creek PUD f 3 . The developer will install the following school safety j improvements : a. A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Avenue N.E. on the west side of Jefferson Avenue N.E. with appropriate signing should be required. b. Approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting on Ha N.E . ingtoontheAvenue H llcrest sElementary side, from Jefferson Avenue School parking lot entrance . storm drainage. Therised curbing would also require appropriate of The developer has indicated that it the hesstaffo hasplaceindicated several that tit buildings on the project ande lanning believes that this is a major mofthat1ontheto the projectUhas gone. The Pthrough and Development Committee believes so many changes and the council has received so much as occurred needs to be undertakenn that a full compilation of what h Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council recommends as follows : 1 . A staff report shall be prepared setting forth the factual background of this PPUD and blisThegformatlused oshallf cbe conclusions , and a proposed decision. examiner . essentially that used by the hearing 2 . The staff ' s proposal will be tendered to htheingtydate council and a the council will establish p proposed changes to the modifications to the PUD and the pro P traffic plan. 3 . The staff report will be presented to the hearing examiner at the same time it is presented to the city council . The hearing examiner shall have two weeks to review the report or completeness and accuracy and make recommendationsrdtoetions the ity council, if any, for additions, corrections, the proposed staff report. DATED: December 11, 1989 . 1- 4 1-4"6/ ohn Reed, Chairman Nancy athews Ai-LiZe i - ( A)/, , , (_, , Kathy yeolker-Wheeler LJW: as . CITY8 : 11 . 2 7------ r 4i 0 CITY OF RENTON IA FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Earl Clymer, Mayor Fire Marshal: Glen G. Gordon Chief: A. Lee Wheeler MEMORANDUM DATE: November 28, 1989 TO: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineering FROM: Glen G. Gordon - Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Honeycreek PUD - Fire Department Emergency Access Gary: This is in follow-up to our meeting this date with Skip Jacobson, Project Coordinator for Honeycreek PUD. The Fire Department will accept the proposed 20 foot access off of Northeast 23rd Street, less that required for the bulkhead. For clarification, there will be no cross traffic over this access road, nor no construction next to this access road. Also, as we discussed, the Fire Department approves the proposal of a 20 foot in width access around the complex, paved to support a 20-ton fire engine, and a security gate with chain and padlock. If you have any questions, please give me a call. GGG:mbt 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2642 D FT f)°" 10 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT ``PLANNING`,:DIVIf;ION' MEMORANDUM DATE: November 22, 1989 TO: Larry Springer Planning Manager FROM: Don Erickson Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Honey Creek P.U.D. File Review A thorough review of the P.U.D. file could take one person working full time three or four days to complete with another day to summarize their results. Since staff have other responsibilities I would assume I could only direct someone to spend half their time on this project. Therefore I estimate conservatively 10 working days or two weeks. Assume work began on December 4th we could expect to have this work completed by December 18, 1989 . Time Schedule for E.I .S. , Conditional Use Permit, and Supplemental Environmental Reviews. This item should only take a day tc draft and another day or so to lay out in draft form. Since Jerry Lind is out the remainder of this week I would feel better telling you we could have something by the end of the day on Monday, December 4th. I would expect to have something drawn out enough by the end of this week. If you have any questions on this or want me to reprioritize our work to expedite this further please let me know. Thanks. November 20, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 315 Good Shepherd Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11 th Place, Renton, reported that as of 11/17/89, continued) HUD had not approved the lease agreement between Good Shepherd and the Lutheran Church for use of the property on Olympia Avenue NE, HUD had not approved the management plan submitted by Good Shepherd, and concerns related to the separation of church and state had not been resolved to the satisfaction of the ACLU. Citizen Comment: Webb - Sanford Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, indicated concern that Gifts from Sister City generosity extended by residents of Nishiwaki is not being reciprocated by the City. He felt that if the City does not intend to respond in kind, gifts from Nishiwaki should be declined. Mayor Clymer pointed out that because State law prohibits the use of City funds for this purpose, reciprocal gifts have been provided by Renton officials at their own expense; the gifts from Japan are given to the City, not to individuals, and are on display in public facilities; and Nishiwaki officials have been apprised of the laws regarding use of City funds to purchase gifts, and would be offended if the City refused them. Citizen Comment: Webb - On a second matter, Mr. Webb urged Council to reinstate the audience Reinstatement of comment portion of the agenda at each Council meeting. MOVED BY Audience Comment at STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THE Council Meetings MATTER OF REINSTATEMENT OF AUDIENCE COMMENT AT ALL COUNCIL MEETINGS TO THE COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Appointment: Municipal Mayor Clymer appointed Greg Murray, 253 129th Avenue NE, Bellevue, Arts Commission 98005, to the Municipal Arts Commission for a three-year term beginning 12/1/89 and expiring 12/31/92. Mr. Murray is active in the Renton community through the Imperials Music and Youth Organization, 2003 Maple Valley Highway, Suite 213, Renton, 98055. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Claim: Mark, CL-51-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $479.20 filed by Ione Mark, 21009 4th South, Seattle, for back injuries allegedly sustained in a fall at Maplewood Golf Course, claiming negligence in failure to cover floor with non-skid material. Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. CAG: 89-077, North City Clerk's Office reported bid opening 11/9/89 for North Highlands Highlands Recreation Recreation Center Interior Improvements; five bids received; engineer's Center Interior estimate: $110,000. Refer to Community Services Committee. Improvements CAG: 89-074, City Clerk's Office reported bid opening 11/9/89 for underground fuel Underground Fuel storage tank removal; one bid received; engineer's estimate: $75,000. Refer Storage Tank Removal to Utilities Committee. Finance: Pooled Finance Director requested ordinance delegating authority to apportion Investments and earnings on pooled investments and to oversee interfund loans. Refer to Interfund Loans Ways and Means Committee. Budget: 1990 City of Finance Director requested inclusion of the following items in the 1990 Renton budget ordinance proposed for first reading on 11/27/89: 1) adopt the 1990 City Budget; 2) close and dissolve the Federal Revenue Sharing and Coulon Park Construction Funds; and 3) amend certain fee schedules. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Board/Commission: Planning Commission recommended amendment of Shoreline Master Program Planning Commission, Section 7.12, Docks and Piers. Refer to Planning and Development Shoreline Master Committee. Program, Docks & Piers MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS The Planning and Development Committee discussed traffic access to the Planning and Honey Creek Preliminary Planned Unit Development site from Development Committee Jefferson/Harrington Avenue NE The Committee recommended that the PUD: Preliminary, Honey Administration be directed to: Creek, PPUD-015-84, Site Access 1) Review the proposed Honey Creek PPUD to ensure that it complies with code, particularly in the area of street ownership and development standards and timing of the development; a November 20. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 316 2) Review the access requirements, design standards, and staff recommendations with regard to fire access along NE 23rd Street; 3) Review the entire case file and prepare a staff recommendation regarding Council action on the PPUD; and 4) Refer the case to the Hearing Examiner for his review and recommendations on imposition of conditions on the PPUD in the event Council chooses to approve the project. The Council further requested that on 12/7/89, the Administration provide to the Planning and Development Committee a status report and schedule of issuance of the staff recommendation and hearing examiner report. Then LCouncil will schedule a public meeting to consider final action. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation (Aviation) The Transportation (Aviation) Committee concurred in the recommendation Committee of the Public Works Department to approve the assignment of the Lien Lease: Lien, LAG-003-86 airport lease to the Liens' lending institution as security, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Airport: Rules, The Transportation (Aviation) Committee concurred in the recommendation Regulations and of the Public Works Department that the City Council adopt and approve the Minimum Standards Renton Municipal Airport Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards. The rules shall be published in a 5" by 8" booklet for convenience and distribution. The Committee recommended that this matter be referred to Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the following report regarding the status of Committee referrals: Utility: Seattle Water Many issues remain to be discussed regarding the purchase of water from the Purchase City of Seattle. Staff will present an issue paper to the Utilities Committee Referred 12/7/87) with recommendations for action during the first quarter of 1990. Garbage: Waste Reduction The program Waste Reduction and Recycling Program is going very well. and Recycling Program Staff will present a 1989 annual report with recommendations for changes Referred 12/5/88) and/or improvements during the first quarter of 1990. LID: 335, Sierra Heights Staff will present recommendations regarding LID 335 to the Utilities Sewer Improvements Committee in December, 1989. Referred 3/13/89) Utilities Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the following referrals for action: Utility: Underground Staff has negotiated the issue of enforcement of underground utilities Utilities Ordinance ordinance with TCI and Puget Power. The following agreement has been Enforcement Procedures reached: 1) New plats/short plats will use a joint trench with all utility Referred 4/24/89) companies (PP, U.S. West, WNG, TCI, etc.); 2) New buildings in existing overhead service areas will use joint trench with Puget Power placing either direct burial lines on private property or conduit on street crossings for TCI's use at time of installation or for future use. The City recommended limiting the road crossings to as few as possible, say not over two (2) every 300 feet. The Committee recommended removal of this item from the agenda since it has been resolved. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Utility: Sewer Capacity in Council passed a moratorium on sewer connections in this area. Plans are East Renton (NE 4th proceeding to design the East Renton Interceptor project. Staff has agreed to Corridor) provide periodic updates on this project and its many issues. Referred 6/5/89) The Utilities Committee recommended that this general item be removed from the agenda at this time. Specific issues and/or reports will be presented to Council from time to time and agenda bills will be used to refer items to the Utilities Committee as needed. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT NOVEMBER 20, 1989 The Committee discussed an Administration recommendation concerning traffic access to the HONEY CREEK PPUD from Jefferson/Harrington Ave. N.E. The Committee recommends that the a Administration to 1) review the proposed Honey Creek PPUD to ensure that it complies with code, particularly in the area of street a° , ownership and development standards and timing of the development, 2) review the access requirements, design standards, and staff recommendations with regard to fire access along N.E. 23rd Street, 3) review the entire case file and prepare a staff recommendation regarding Council action on the PPUD, and 4) have the Hearing Examiner review the case and recommend conditions that should be imposed on the PPUD in the event the Council chooses to approve the project. The Council further asks that the Administration return to Planning and Development at the December 7th meeting with a status report and a schedule as to when the staff recommendation and Hearing Examiner's report would be available. With this information, Council could then schedule a public meeting to consider final action. ohn Reed, Chair 4a Nancy Mathjws, Vice-Chair Kathy K olker-Wheeler, Member 7n 7f — goilte, eat_;tte 1,4..t.i.,:.6, 4,,,J,2, 1, 94< z___ _.( 21(„ 0_06/LA__". 1XL /...0, 7". 0,-,--2_6_4_,. e_e____. 1 Ptin. e;e,-tei cJ,eAl6_, 4 6 cii - i‘2— 1 I I PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT NOVEMBER 16, 1989, MEETING The Committee discussed an Administration recommendation concerning traffic access to the HONEY CREEK PPUD from Jefferson/Harrington Ave. N.E. The Committee recommends that the Council direct the Administration to 1) review the proposed Honey Creek PPUD to ensure that it complies with code, particularly in the area of street ownership and development standards and timing of the development, 2) review the access requirements, design standards, and staff recommendations with regard to fire access along N.E. 23rd Street, 3) review the entire case file and prepare a staff recommendation regarding Council action on the PPUD, and 4) have the Hearing Examiner review the case and recommend conditions that should be imposed on the PPUD in the event the Council chooses to approve the project. The Council further asks that the Administration return to Planning and Development at the December 7th meeting with a status report and a schedule as to when the staff recommendation and Hearing Examiner's report would be available. With this information, Council could then schedule a public meeting to consider final action. John Reed, Chair Nancy Mathews, Vice-Chair Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Member 6 LCE "C( ON VJBoblomberq 5611 119 SE Suite #2 1989Bellevue, Wa. 98006 206) 746-1181 UEPAAIMi; ENT Ken Nyberg Community Development Department 200 Mill Ave Renton, Wa 98055 x ~ Dear Ken: Would ,you please respond in writing as to the time limit status for Ordinance 4143 which gives Honey Creek Associates two years from approval of ppud to apply for a building permit. As you know there was a provision to not count the time required to resolve the status of 23rd. street. As this issue has just recently been resolved we feel the Lwo years is just beginning. Please verify our findings. i Th ank You Bob Tomberg Paqe - 1 September 25, 1989 111 Renton City Council Minut Page 265 PROCLAMATION A proclamation was read by Mayor Clymer declaring the week of September Mike Parness Week 25, 1989, as Mike Parness Week in Renton to honor Mike Parness for his service to three mayors of the City over the past ten years as administrative assistant; for providing direction, leadership, innovative ideas and dedication; and for carrying out his duties with candor and humor. Mr. Parness has resigned his position with the City of Renton to accept a position as city manager for the city of San Clemente, California. Mayor Clymer presented the proclamation to Mr. Parness with praise and gratitude for a job well done. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION WITH A STANDING OVATION. Mr. Parness expressed pleasure in serving Mayor Clymer and Council members as well as all of the previous mayors and council members he has worked with since coming to the City in 1979. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance 4*4240 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Maple Avenue SW, located west Vacation: VAC-88-002,of Renton Shopping Center and south of SW Sunset Boulevard; Swaim, Ditty, Maple Avenue SW, Mathewson and Hollandsworth (formerly Priebe Street Vacation); VAC-002- Swaim, Ditty, 88. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL Mathewson, and ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. Hollandsworth (formerly CARRIED. Priebe) Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented the following ordinances for first reading: Rezone: Omni Group An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Thomas Hampton), at 3016 Benson Road South from R-3, medium density multifamily zone, to R-037-89 B-1, business district zone, for the Omni Group, Inc. (Thomas Hampton). MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Before adoption of the ordinance on 10/2/89, Council requested a map reflecting zoning surrounding the subject site. Mayor Clymer agreed to provide the information. Rezone: Polygon An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Corporation (Sunset at 901 Sunset Boulevard NE from R-1, single family residential zone, to R-3, Downs), R-019-89 medium density multifamily zone, for the Polygon Corporation (Sunset Downs), R-019-89. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Council indicated concern with high volume of traffic being generated from three new developments near the intersection of Aberdeen and Sunset NE, and questioned need for traffic signalization. Mayor Clymer agreed to discuss the matter with staff. CAG: 89-068, King Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report County Interlocal recommending approval of an interlocal agreement with King County for Agreement for Municipal probation services for Municipal Court, and authorizing the Mayor and City Court Probation Services Clerk to sign the contract. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 63685 through 64053 in the amount of 1,062,905.89, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 63691 and 63697 through 63699 machine voided. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THE PUD: Preliminary. Honey LETTER FROM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO COUNCIL Creek, PPUD-015-84 REGARDING ADEQUACY OF ACCESS ROADS SERVING THE PROPOSED HONEY CREEK PUD TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Interim Administrative Mayor Clymer introduced Brent McFall, who will replace Mike Parness as Assistant administrative assistant on an interim basis. Mr. McFall has served the Public Works Department of the City of Renton as I-405 S-curve project coordinator and is currently customer services manager. He was formerly city administrator for the City of Kent. LILA/V S V a'iCyP CITY OF RENTON LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division September 13, 1989 CITY TO: Members, Renton City Council SEP 2 6 1989 r' VIA: Mayor Earl Clymer P ti ' 1 ! SUBJECT: Honey Creek PUD PPUD-015-84 72 units, 476 trip ends) Honorable Council Members: The City Council requested the Public Works Department to review the adequacy of the streets serving as the southern exit from the proposed Honey Creek PUD particularly with regard to safety issues (pedestrian, etc. ) and to recommend improvements to mitigate the estimated increase in traffic. Recommendations were to be referred back to City Council (minutes of 7/24/89) . The following items, to be provided by the developer, are the recommended improvements which address transportation concerns: 1 . On-site roadways to be improved to the City of Renton standards curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting) . 2. Off-site roadway Jefferson Ave. NE from subject site to Harrington Ave. NE: a) Provide new street construction to City standards which will include but not be limited to curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting. b) Negotiate the removal of the single combination power and telephone pole on this short segment of Jefferson Ave. NE and provide underground service to the duplex and four-plex located at 2011 and 2012 Jefferson Ave. NE which would be impacted by the removal of the overhead power and telephone conductors. 3. School safety improvements: a) A thermoplastic marked school crosswalk crossing Harrington Ave. NE on the west side of Jefferson Ave. NE with appropriate signing should be required. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washineton 98055 - (2061 235-2620 Members, Renton City Council Page 2 September 13, 1989 b) Harrington Ave. NE, south side, from Jefferson Ave. NE to Hillcrest Elementary School parking lot entrance: Developer should provide approximately 550 feet of raised curb, gutter, sidewalk and street lighting for safety of school children. The raised curbing would also require appropriate storm drainage. If we can provide additional information, please let us know. Sincerely, Zrt_ Lynn A. Guttmann Public Works Director CEM:ad Attachments cc: John Ralston Larry Springer CEM162 l I I 1 •t i 1 ; •••. ,1 . ,`. ' cj. v.'s? ', t{,S jQ .,( e11 !. `..ro 1•n4.r%' 1 1•fl G' J11 1 N Q. 1 {t \ - W; 4c i I I u u rn f tJr 1 F No 1 G v't. Lot 3 P' [O 1' z 35.66 Acres j/ 1' fill' h... Y Ike 11C E If betnr fi, 4 1 t' _ L 1 p r g ' 17;1 I1-' yl, i ', 11 • Y. Wtelrn W I 17 1• ItW „ 4„ '''''' r 1 ,,. A. 'e11,t en At. ' I e17•I 11J t. 7 . i.Cs 1 r1 If r I!I I. 1 N¢ 1. f ' , , V.: Ilik Red $Lmm IA nin Co Int J SI 1 11011 . I 9 I NE Q151M SN. t t I\ \• cly . . 1 t .., n 1e1At III At. •I f• I n • 041 Al 1• t , a t1 i' I A 154.4 An_1 1 ri y 0',Eli; t a N.E. 24TH ST. •, F: t: it nror ! y 1 9•-• y::11-1 .,•t1_..1 le ISt IS• 11 It ;A• S IS : 11 II, II A•A1 1 .4i 1 •. •t I r i Y j • :1 • ltt M 11 T.i:. scix11• 14 10 tt 1 111 1. III If 11{li 7f 11 II 11 f 11 SI)WI;E fA::;T ,N iE sR •E OD V 1' d'•, , Pa ' rN ti A N.E. . 23RD , ,. " .:.,,• •:. ''' / 111' .; ' a t1 r I. I, Mil ; I i , te1 1 f, fl' N 11 11 1 , 1 I 1 S • L1 t 1 S 10 II It 11. a. N 1 11 'S1 re.f:__ . .: 1^ •I . 51 Y 1 . 1 I, ..,.,•. Ir r ,tl'-; ap bb..,e.r tl.nne ne.l t R a' 116 it _,,.- 1t'Ij-•/M 0•, I' I LJ i iIIVI,11h tar tll;".:". r.• ly4 e11•t' 1 : i I IP - 11.`.e'e Aft 4tnAti Jt•. . J - 1, . r.•r t '•_ :t.. i.:N.E1 !.gi2t1F- ..w. i SJ_•-- $ t.i------ IP . 1" I1 - 1 a leAt." rE; 1 1` iT;l( i;:;11:.t.( c 71 t' I IliI,..•. „•• I.N.E-- 2r - - - t---.'• '''' r Re ove 1 c,[,a 1/ZP(`7LtA, pole.iti 11 t03, , y•-... - ,f;F'1rVtrF'r'+>f:' 1 at-,A poek-Mead IJc eY n.a...• wrl rta cji n• t' C t1 S i•1 an Ai ' '.i t , 1 ._ i 1 ! : t. r•'II. et,t& • 1•IsP4 '9- t yb i.VCj 14a r r•,.J t M Vin Ii' 1 In N, •w I•. IJ J,•:i Al ...eft ..•f ••I+:• 1 .. .: r!_,:.,.a,v.•:Var•.t.•'.•.u. : N.s.,.Y.1::{ Oebettn Sor pot II..J I, V . 1 I ' S t y ,,3 wr 4.. ilk , • 1 S^I' ..0 .;4L. 6 is yy A, ` '- ;kx ',_ t__ it < caf 6tarJn'1 II./4 1 r[i f 4, r t ' A' r cJI A arlaeth 1( j 1 .... ` i 4 Y° fry ! t: ltoVi_ 6 '•'• L‘ 1u . ",,A-' r ' . ell 1,11h.r ; 1,11' L=1. Y]- iect ``•. ee J • :> t V . ! y•e 1 1, N E. 10141. 0° sr. 'tom a •© sz: ' at, 2 a Y !, 9 a • i lC•_\»,r ern I •'If - 4 It ,,`•/\ '2 FD ••L' .y•. 1' , y O S,, t ttM i 4toI1L el ' O 0y yt' ` 1 d'' CI ax t.— Z ti 1 ^1 1aUU, rttsKtitke ( r 7' \:l J S = Snne..J Moiler I I .i 1 4r• to ,s ,1 e JH.E. 19N1 sr. • r,• 1 a 5t `.(. a 1 rr r• V I rte - 11 1 1'1ZNU" ;4 . a ' " . 1 y 1 t I / el S a:.c, 2 I a rr • , y I t; Ni; Z ;, L i •..-, TF.t.0 L_Si ' { tifiv't' Q:..+ I J= \, r' b• W , ; f . t 1 .^„... fa- 4 .' t Eli f T'•>1F O.1/A[. i11 ' ,, 11- rJUI v, f t'. 11• 1 1 ] 1 11 J:.,•. CM N C,"11 IB1,: y'• r 5'' , r 1 { lx• "11 11.1 qI n. I! . n Ye • i4- -1+•0-_Cy o \ , 1 IINorth Hightond§ MI7 1 it .I '• .^ • .I.`:I S " Z t. tl ; 1. S.r 5 E- •j '.J",._ I _ n,., ; „,•• T T,.'E D L T Q , a: 1 tt1 • :r r- ;.,•r•t.•r^ Ie1: G: . f 16 TH J l2 , OS N4ii7zA5IPork;%3 te• - • - I R:% c fo, ` to rc 1 tt :': ? m, I `' i I I,'r i[F_e.,9 `tv, • •.. 1. 1 • 11. 1 - - K4 .1 k 14. 4/. r../.1i 7 5_--- .;A •I•I In 7\ J ju-ly 24, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 216 i CAG: 88-076, Lind Public Works/Transportation Department submitted CAG-076-88, LindlAvenueSWImprovementsil' Avenue SW Improvements from SW 10th Street to SW 12th Street; andfiontW• 10th Street t6'' requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate intheSW12thSfreefamountof $17,008.50, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $21,616.97 to contractor, Gary Merlino Construction Company, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke asked whether the abandoned vehicle, reportedCitizenComment: Vaupel by Versie Vaupel at the Council meeting of 7/17/89, has been removedfromAbandonedVehiclesthestreetinherneighborhood. Mayor Clymer reported that the vehicle owner has been notified of the violation by the Police Department and the car will be towed if not removed immediately. Ile conveyed information from the police department that although City law states that the car can be towed within 24 hours, the notification procedure usually takes about10days. Then the owner has the right to a hearing before the hearing examiner. If the examiner finds that proper procedures were not followed by the City,the City can be liable for payment of all towing and storage fees. Upon further inquiry, Mayor Clymer was uncertain as to whether a citation had been placed on the vehicle. Streets: Valley Councilwoman Mathews indicated that the Valley TransportationCommitteeTransportationBenefithascontinuedtomeetregardingtheformationofatransportationbenefitDistrict (South King district (TBD) in the Valley with other jurisdictions. She indicated thataCounty) favorable response was received recently from the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) in Olympia when the Valley Transportation Committee presented the concept of a Valley TBD includingproposedboundariesandalistofprojects. Ms. Mathews reported the intent of the TBD Committee to submit applications to the TIB in September forprojectswithinitsboundaries. Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler discussed the Honey Creek PUD, which was not allowed to proceed on 6/19/89 when Council decided to take no further action to acquire right-of-way on NE 23rd Street to provide full access to the l A t.1• ' site. She recalled concerns of neighbors who were originally in favor ofthev r development as an improvement to discourage crime, dumping, and1 'L i 1 motorcycle access in the area; and cited the original recommendation bythehearingexaminerforimprovementofNE23rdtoemergencyaccessz€; l standards. Ms. Keolker-Wheeler indicated that it was Council that required v,,,4 to-{ 0- full improvement of NE 23rd Street, resulting in pursuit of condemnationof9/3 e-/8v 73 v''^ propertyowned bythe CormanstoE:^ provide the necessary right of way width. Council President Stredicke opposed taking action on the matter this date• without sending proper notification to all parties of record, and preferred that the matter be discussed at a public hearing or meeting. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WIIEELER, SECONDED BY REED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE HONEY CREEK PUD TO REQUIRE THAT NE 23RD STREET BE IMPROVED F MERGENCY ACCESS ONLY; THATv is : . a ., .•Ri •,L :;•e.: , W THE ADEQUACY NG AS THE SOU ERN EXIT FROMTHISfROJE ]fib RECt.7MMENIS,TFIOSE-IMPROVEME T F ANY, NECESSITATED.hY-THE 7NCR €5 TRAFFIC-TO BfGENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL. SPECIFICALLY, THE STAFF SHOULD FOCUS ON THE NEED FOR SAFETY ISSUES SUCH AS SIDEWALKS AND CROSSWALKS. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE REFERRD BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS SOON AS THEY ARE COMPLETE. AT THAT TIME, THE COUNCIL WILL DECIDE WHAT IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO FINALIZE APPROVAL OFTHISPROJECT. ANY IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THE COUNCIL WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE EXPENSE OF TIIE DEVELOPER AS ASPECIFICCONDITIONOFFINALPUDAPPROVAL. WHEN THAT INFORMATION COMES BACK TO THE COUNCIL, THERE SHOULD BE A PUBLIC MEETING OR PUBLIC HEARING AT THAT TIME TO CONSIDER THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented areportCommitteerecommendingthefollowingordinanceforfirstreading: I • • I!!11111111 1 i 9,I i. li; I It,......k.,,,:2....., 2 .,,,44. 1,, , ricl, )!...,.. . 0,,.,,..., r, It-1_:__ . 1 .\••\ Id' V 2., kt(1 I'' A •;1•' E 7 S.t ! N •1.q 11„. ,,, .." .. e.,, . Z., j - 1. 44141Y IOli .--_.' P!--/- ft f/•:•''•'.•, 1 .'• • • . .. ....; ':Z.1.4.-,........- covil. Lot 3 I ei, ., :• 1;1)1 la 0IS1. , I I • •1„ -i mg I ZIP• i ra,;-'Ll ,;i:e_ ., ,..„,., . - 2-- 1 I ()- ••• 1.1.• (42 4i . Eli z 0 ..rtt-41 ‘tKi•ei R. i. 0): , r, ti42:4.,, I. : t•-•••••• 1.111Iir ' itt::21' ro.st Iwo ar i 1011 l 1 , 1:1;iii 40. ' ""'•' ftr) 1 Y. We '.. t HO 4, ' 1. X\ et, - 1 rli 1. 1 \ 35 66 acres t PI V g, 1l0 :1 11111C i Red Sarnin Illnen3 Co Inc 1IIIlt. ht I Noon,' r- 1.-.:: iblifir • ' 1 f0C,,y , \1111 Al 11. 111 A, •• r r • tic cil4 PilAl 1 1 I - -- -- .---- • .- ,t'‘. 1% - • L. ' . 0 - •••• 1. .1.1-. 73-• . NN ). M r.or •0111 I 1 ; 3 I j dl A n 2130Ifi'VCaa.0v___1 1 4 7.' lel: ; S tl 1: 6 9'44 ' \... 4.• ' M 4.! N.E. 24 T 11 S T. '..., "-+);i3" I I 4 •.,..::,........,_... •..,..., 14 I 11 I 11 11 1.1.. 1,10 11 • 14 it, it,. e ,.10.1--/ „ r i 11; lir . ';' -i. .",,o i 71 ../11 I. '/I ;11 11 I./4 ././ d.. 1.2,1 li ' I 4,/ 111ii‘NI.;EL A:).T ;H ;E ;R 5, E ;0.. ,, , .1 i , ril. ,. f , 23s0 pt.. 4' 0. 4 :, 311°-- t) .k?.' 3. tvE. a' 1 11. .• I it i. 1.!' '••114‘"drir•-•-• r-...- 7r:. 1 ITITirf---''t 44". .' i " " tFe.•; ...._„:,_. ... i. .. ...: g I i I..• • 111'4_, I 1 '‘• 1.•' 2"V:--Pi;q:::7.--1- -'-'• I '' 17-1, 4?,Ct 71-1T0-..,-.-7- -.... 51..1.... 1 I I 1 _ I . I Tr- !•"::1' "1 " :ir‘,1 .. rn. r-3.. :').---Wk..'- I :. I c••••,„ l , irs.....,.. to r-i i .• 1 - 1 ' I; ti--,,-• -• 1L.1...... .114•o/1••III%4114...114.111,4 1 t.1• Ir '. 1 I..•I,I I.••..,., ..•.• ..... ....• ".. ii.91,14'SI ft,. a.:fl. ?, F+fl 141ilf ' i ‘i ... .1 I. :.:!.;-1,...,, I,-... 4.A,,.'f ei''. 1...It.;"". 1 " 1:‘ :. ti I ! ' m". ! ".;"• ''l• i '.''8-1,Ci*•',11'4-i1-.4 1.014 I •.- I•a-- 1.••• : I'. •.;.- 1 . •-•--".i i•,••• --.,‘•. I I '13-'' ,.1 " " I • '' i 1 •:.n.• 1 .:1.... 1 iiti------!-1 g 3..... i•ritai,Ft;i7q12-41p.riii-3 i , 11: .." 1 r-, • 1'''41 ',1.11,Iiir: . - • N-. 4' IR11. ..1.... ,. ...,....:1.. .1.....i.. .,,.. ... .,t”, 1 . .., i IL!: OV.I. ..,t I 1 I -• i • :: 11 . 1.4., Rep-nov st: ... Mu. . ..,,....•. ,,,, tientill01.1/1114, 7777 0 ti t• j 1.--;,--- ri 1 . 1 . - II: f,, • ./.. • •••• il.:.. ,,,14. 0,: 11 111 111 ...;,... R.et.)/(A" 111"44e-4-11 041-^-5 --?7. .i.!<0 I". oc4, 1 . 1... t,01, il, . :.i3..!: 7.: ci..3... 1,.. t);, t. „., kS7: 1 .....:ro ...• 40. ‹. C.11111, 11 t 111 s.C3 Ile bait. ca.'evil r-r- a- - ii•; 1 ,""• . 1 • ..,0.,1 7,•II 10: ' 11!!: - Li, ff 4a41 ' ' 'V• ft.. i V,,. : 1;1-. •-•,•-- 131, tt_tti.,.I • V 11 lye)* i : 3 II•••. vt,1 E...1 if it 4 fi r .. 1.* * 1 4. I, 4.2,CLE 4/. 4.,,,:b . 1-• ?., bNt . 4 ,..„ 11.••lbonli 44.. ,,, --,-ra12AE., .?o Ts 4r0,.Si '.e•i. i " I f-.3" ': v C2. - ffl' •••• 14tf: 7, 11..;;:.f_.' ,...,.:• . `- ... , N.?r- I\,.,'.._,M !Pi , I. ..-;;;;1-• (-9 i (9 1,0 •' '..;„...;=. 1;3 • _ rs:___E2- z U. ,i yg k.,•.( 11„), Bil- - k.:) . 0%.....: J II 1.4 I J Ifleatr s 1..' a :,.n........I.V...!.......Eq....• 1 j . '.-4•-• i ..! 2 :,1. ''''' '. 1.•' % 11 lie): -tc- ti:A:,64P' 4' .44. (-001...3 :i• Ci ' C 1 • 5r,-. - 7 ; 2 ! 4C,,• 1 .4'•(I• 0-1 4 .' .. I , ' 1 ' $‘ 16,1Li'l ° ; III . V. ';•%; • • s) • e ,a, lx z . f 1 /i . •-r-r-. 1 ••- t-,:4-:- , - '''' "•:-.-'•-•;... .. ,. • 0 .,,i• 0.,,,,,/s, i 1 ..t .. T•. 1„, c' Ve.) 7 3-i c.-,..• I.,. (:)) it- i• s t r.nr.d.•J 11.11er 11isii,...--J it..,I,,J•I , ''11--1. 1.(7,:* .:;,';. ..•- •• 1) T. a 0 S e 4 . Ip6Ik(f ,...10" '' t' s, if 1 if sr. I . P atN ; ittu ,.. ; i1C.1....TI - 174:-1 .. •.,W iskikl . s' A % E-1-.1,43iNPAbEi OA-J*41 3\ .. , c6 • 1 ‘ ..a- .... 4,. 1 . ,• 7 i,„ I. .1..,...... ' 1 1 1. 1 i'' V •1. P.1 . A. . p ..-,, (0'. i,;,t I st'IL' • • ,0, ' " t%' i ?‘ ; \ I .."' ' RA' • 4.. 1 .d...t1:di u= ' 4 ot It: -: ft,`I.',:, . ..4 , 7, ;•••• iNAt r:...:1 i lc* 1: I i I I : I 1 IILL_ ..._:le....,e1 1 ;. til„3 , tii,, I %. 1 r. '. 0 0 r •• tr..... •::,:.. , 1t• N E. 11114 :AVG. t t ., E t21 tt'',, 1.71J- .11 .,t aiV... 0 if AC. iI1 '`"1. f=/4/M1110 .1"Fl. lin,1 ..:, 41,.,t I 4 I ii •Sljt. re. tV4 till' Eli!/.3 r:D. .' K , x; it, , s, I 411.•; lea il AO.i 7NorlbIligblopdttal .a....„...... 1 ' !I1,•.p..•:„1" s 6 .>, , .. . _______ le 4 ' i '''' ::../- 14 .. S t • - 51 ', • TE D 11. I ,1 _•_:.--1.,_,2, . .. ,. /,- 24. • . 0- A%. i • . - 4? 4<_ .- sass. IPork -...1i t-• V/ Al APO207. -7:")..." 46•• . ' •'i r,•1 I14 ,-*---;,.c...,.. -,•:.•.•,. „ t 4‘• : Jo r 5i-?, ,••:... cis W4 7\I t? sT. °sal i te---,- , .r(" 'II, i - --....:. ).- rtc• ° -; • :' v 4 C30 11.: _#_,....,.,..._._ 4kip e .,,.. .... I0 11s:... ki... _ . i.:.) E. LI' ,„_••••.. 1 . ,.: •• .*.. .„. , 5 4 :.t• • ,. 4(Vi•„y 16, ,, i, • . 11.• 1 I ; • • R l‘qC1. ki '; Q1111' rkt I-N 1 July 24, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 216 CAG: 88-076, Lind Public Works/Transportation Department submitted CAG-076-88, Lind Avenue SW Improvements Avenue SW Improvements from SW 10th Street to SW 12th Street; and from SW 10th Street to requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the SW 12th Street amount of $17,008.50, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $21,616.97 to contractor, Gary Merlino Construction Company, if all required releases have been received. Council concur. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Stredicke asked whether the abandoned vehicle, reported Citizen Comment: Vaupel by Versie Vaupel at the Council meeting of 7/17/89, has been removed from Abandoned Vehicles the street in her neighborhood. Mayor Clymer reported that the vehicle owner has been notified of the violation by the Police Department and the car will be towed if not removed immediately. He conveyed information from the police department that although City law states that the car can be towed within 24 hours, the notification procedure usually takes about 10 days. Then the owner has the right to a hearing before the hearing examiner. If the examiner finds that proper procedures were not followed by the City, the City can be liable for payment of all towing and storage fees. Upon further inquiry, Mayor Clymer was uncertain as to whether a citation had been placed on the vehicle. Streets: Valley Councilwoman Mathews indicated that the Valley Transportation Committee Transportation Benefit has continued to meet regarding the formation of a transportation benefit District (South King district (TBD) in the Valley with other jurisdictions. She indicated that a County) favorable response was received recently from the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) in Olympia when the Valley Transportation Committee presented the concept of a Valley TBD including proposed boundaries and a list of projects. Ms. Mathews reported the intent of the TBD Committee to submit applications to the TIB in September for projects within its boundaries. PUD: Preliminary, Honey Councilwoman Keolker-Wheeler discussed the Honey Creek PUD, which was Creek, PPUD-015-84 not allowed to proceed on 6/19/89 when Council decided to take no further action to acquire right-of-way on NE 23rd Street to provide full access to the site. She recalled concerns of neighbors who were originally in favor of the development as an improvement to discourage crime, dumping, and motorcycle access in the area; and cited the original recommendation by the hearing examiner for improvement of NE 23rd to emergency access i standards. Ms. Keolker-Wheeler indicated that it was Council that required full improvement of NE 23rd Street, resulting in pursuit of condemnation of property owned by the Cormans to provide the necessary right of way width. Council President Stredicke opposed taking action on the matter this date without sending proper notification to all parties of record, and preferred that the matter be discussed at a public hearing or meeting. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE HONEY CREEK PUD TO REQUIRE THAT NE 23RD STREET BE IMPROVED FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY; THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REVIEW THE ADEQUACY OF THE STREETS SERVING AS THE SOUTHERN EXIT FROM THIS PROJECT AND RECOMMEND THOSE IMPROVEMENTS, IF ANY, NECESSITATED BY THE INCREASED TRAFFIC TO BE GENERATED BY THIS PROPOSAL. SPECIFICALLY, THE STAFF SHOULD FOCUS ON THE NEED FOR SAFETY ISSUES SUCH AS SIDEWALKS AND CROSSWALKS. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD BE REFERRD BACK TO THE CITY COUNCIL AS SOON AS THEY ARE COMPLETE. AT THAT TIME, THE COUNCIL WILL DECIDE WHAT IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED IN ORDER TO FINALIZE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT. ANY IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THE COUNCIL WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEVELOPER AS A SPECIFIC CONDITION OF FINAL PUD APPROVAL. WHEN THAT INFORMATION COMES BACK TO THE COUNCIL, THERE SHOULD BE A PUBLIC MEETING OR PUBLIC HEARING AT THAT TIME TO CONSIDER THE g STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for first reading: ot) a MOTION RE: HONEY CREEK PUD I move that the City Council amend the Honey Creek PUD to require that N.E. 23rd Street be •improved for emergency access only. I further move that the public works Department review the adequacy of the streets serving as the southern exit from this project and recommend those improvements, if any, necessitated by the increased traffic to be generated by this proposal. Specifically, the staff should focus on the need for safety issues such as sidewalks and crosswalks. Staff recommendations should be referred back to the City Council as soon as they are complete. At that time, the Council will decide what improvements will be required in order to finalize approval of this project. Any improvements required by the Council will be provided at the expense of the developer a sa specific condition of final PUD approval. /- ` .-`h rr- I S` of Y'QGU rme,-kdL + cr-..<-, r c 1)reSir1`[ CL 'me CO wile; ( A p u J l iC rnee-Hh9 ©r hearir\g vi-vel he he CO (as afrr vNriato) a IiO'J DATED: July 24 , 1989 WbIiC i 1pU`F- heL ard< n YecD"' "'D461-flUnS . 50640 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION E 11 a ne L a c i 11 e being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the CITY OF RENTON VALLEY DAILY NEWS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 19th day Dailyofnewspapers six (6) times a week. That said newspapers C amJu e, s1 of thet Renton7: 30 p.m. in cithp Council publishedChambers of Municipal Build- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ing, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Wash- months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published ington, as the time and place for a public hearingto considerthe following: the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent, King The question of limiting accesss on NE County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal 23rd Street to emergency access only and newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue NE for the Honey Creek King County.Associates preliminary Planned Unit Devel- opment (PPUD-015-84) and Rezone R- 01Thenoticeintheexactformattached, was published in the Kent Edition Block of Jefferson locatedin the vicinity of 2200 Block of Ave. NE. Renton Edition X Auburn Edition and not in Any and all interested persons are invit- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers ed to be present to voice approval, disap- provalduringthebelowstatedperiod. The annexed notice a or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON, Maxine E. Motor, CMC Notice of Public Hearing City Clerk Published in the Valley Daily News June 9, 1989. R3548. was published on June 9 , 1989 R 3 5 4 8 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ ]9 . 20 _ Subscribed and sworn before me this ]6 day of June 19 89 . r Notary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 11. 4i CITY OF RENTON sAL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: June 19, 1989 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer Members of the City Council RECEIVED FROM: Kenneth E. Nyberg Community Development Director ANN 19 1989 RE: Honey Creek PUD CITY OF RENiuN N.E. 23rd Street CITY COUNCIL File R-014-85, PPUD-015-85 PROBLEM The City, as a result of a recent court decision on the condemnation of N.E. 23rd Street, must determine whether the decision made by the City Council to require N.E. 23rd Street as a second means of access for the Honey Creek PUD development should stand or be replaced with a condition requiring that N.E. 23rd Street be used only as a gated secondary emergency access for the development. ISSUES Code Requirements: The Renton Municipal Code requires all developments to have direct access to a City street from a development. The Fire Code requires the provision of a fire apparatus access road and when a complex has three or more buildings located more than two hundred (200) feet from a public road, the Fire Code requires two (2) means of access for a development. Generally, an attempt is made to separate the access roadway from the primary access point to the development to ensure emergency access to a development in case the primary access point is closed during an emergency. The City has allowed developments to have one primary access point and allowing the second access to be identified as gated secondary emergency access provided that the access meets the minimum Fire Code standards (20 feet in width and paved). In the City two examples of developments having one primary access with a gated emergency access are Cedar Ridge and Woodcliffe. Access Alternatives: Access has been a major issue for the development. Over time, as a community develops, it may find that development patterns allowed in the past create problems as infill parcels are developed. Such is the case with the subject development (Phase I). In this case, the property is surrounded by low density multiple family developments to the south and single family 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 t Memo To Mayor Clymer Council Members Honey Creek PUD June 19, 1989 Page 2 residential developments to the west and a ravine to the north and east. The roadway network developed in the area over time has segments with sufficient right-of-way while other segments have insufficient right-of-way. Further, several of the roadways are, by current standards are substandard. Alternative access points for the development, in addition to the Jefferson Avenue N.E. access, have been analyzed. The following briefly discusses these earlier alternatives: a.N.E. 21st Street The development of N.E. 21st Street was considered. As with other alternatives, development of the roadway would require additional right-of-way and upgrading of roadways not only along the N.E. 21st corridor but also Harrington Place N.E. The result will be carrying the development traffic through a larger portion of the single family area west of the site than other suggested alternatives. b.N.E. 27th Street (Devils Elbow) This alternative has been reviewed several times. The development of access from this roadway is not a viable alternative due to the instability of the roadway. At this time, it is not safe for either primary access or emergency access. c.N.E. 23rd Street This alternative provides a route which impacts the single family neighborhood less than the N.E. 21st alternative and provides a more direct route for emergency vehicles attempting to service the development. Ideally, this roadway should be developed, in addition to Jefferson, to allow two points of access for the daily traffic generated by the development. Should a decision be made not to develop the access to allow daily traffic, consideration should be given to developing the existing right-of-way as a gated emergency access point. The latter decision, as with the development of a full access point along this right-of-way, may require additional property and/or slope easements in order to provide sufficient bank stabilization on either side of the roadway. The need for bank stabilization will depend upon the design of the roadway based upon engineering studies. The additional right-of-way and/or slope easements are necessary since the use of any structure to retain the banks must be outside the twenty (20) foot paved roadway section required under the Fire Code. The amount of right-of-way required for this option will depend upon the selected method of bank stabilization (rockery, concrete retaining wall or other acceptable means) along the roadway. This has been verified in a conversation with the Acting City Engineer. Necessity of Second Access(Direct or Emergency) Questions have been raised periodically during the review of the development as to whether or not other types of development, such as a single family residential project, would require another access. The answer is yes. Any development of the site would warrant development of Memo To Mayor Clymer Council Members Honey Creek PUD June 19, 1989 Page 3 a second means of access. At a minimum the second access should be identified as a gated emergency access roadway. A second alternative is necessary to ensure that emergency vehicles have an alternative access to the site, in times of emergency, should the access through N.E. 16th street to Jefferson Avenue N.E. be blocked. Access along N.E. 23rd Street allows opportunities to access the site from the north or south along Edmonds Avenue N.E. and that the developed access will be of sufficient width to handle the necessary emergency vehicles. CONCLUSION Of the access alternatives discussed above, it appears that N.E. 23rd Street provides the most reasonable means of a second access to the development. Ideally, this roadway should be developed as originally required as part of the Honey Creek PUD approval by the City as an access alternative to Jefferson Avenue N.E. for daily traffic from the development. This would provide two means of access to the site, spreading the traffic impact among the adjacent developments to the west and south as well as providing an additional unimpeded access point for emergency vehicles. To do this, however, would require the City to use its eminent domain powers of "the public use necessity". The City has wished to be reimbursed for its costs in buying the necessary right-of-way and so negotiated with the developer. The Court, however, in a recent decision, has told the City that if it is to use its condemnation powers to acquire N.E. 23rd Street it must do so on its own initiative independent of the Honey Creek PUD development. Staff believe that because of the apparent difficulties with acquisition and reimbursement to the City, as well as the relatively low numbers of trips generated per day by Phase I of the PUD that an alternative to developing the roadway to accommodate daily traffic would be a decision to restrict the access along N.E. 23rd Street to gated emergency access only. The use of N.E. 23rd Street as a means of emergency vehicle only access, better serves the public interest than the other alternatives available at this time. It reduces the amount of intrusion into the single family neighborhood to the west and reduces impacts to single family residences which may have been built too near the adjacent roadways. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council revise the decision of April 14, 1986 issued for the Honey Creek PUD, deleting the requirement that N.E. 23rd Street be developed as a second access point to the development and replacing the condition with a requirement that N.E. 23rd Street be developed as a gated emergency access point only for the development. The development of the N.E. 23rd Street may require the dedication of additional property, unless necessary slope easements are granted to the City, in order to provide adequate slope protection on either side of the roadway or the paved portion is reduced a sufficient amount to allow the construction of a vertical concrete retaining wall along portions of the southern edge of the right-of-way. The amount of dedication or easement will depend upon the method of stabilization used for the banks along the roadway. OF I 0. z. OFFICE of the CITY CLERK ea 200 Mill Avenue South T,i..iirf.37-•-\14. 1 JuN Ers9 kr71-:::-7:-.1 E- -,,--v-,-,,,-.-7_..-_-_-,-_-_ 0 CITY OF RENTON E-_,----,-. .=:-.,-- L•isi,i..,:!., • Renton, Washington 98055 0 q. 11. 0 sEpie- 7 :3:- ,vzil 'If.; :/. ; : JUN 2 1 198,9 Z..' tJ ;'Z RECEIV eu I, - CITY CLERKS OFFICE rth'Srfr.r , MR CHUCK YOUNGQUIST 12110 SE 96TH frP13° RENTON WA 98055 YOU 10 70 1 497N 1 06/14/89 E'C I '.' r,..:.] ... NO FORWARDIW ORDE:R ON FfiE: UNABLE TO FORWARD - - i hL-.Ic . : ,s' -' - - IILIHL11.!4,14,4,1,,dhi•-:------ RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 19, 1989 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; KATHY A. KEOLKER- COUNCIL MEMBERS WHEELER, TONI NELSON, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED, THOMAS W. TRIMM. Councilman Robert J. Hughes was absent. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; ATTENDANCE LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; KEN NYBERG, Community Development Director; LARRY SPRINGER, Planning Manager; DON MONAGHAN, Acting Engineering Supervisor; JOHN MORRIS, Housing and Community Development Coordinator; CHIEF ALAN Wallis and LT. JOE PEACH, Police Department. PRESS Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL MINUTES COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JUNE 12, 1989. RRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published PUD: Preliminary, Honey in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Clymer opened the public Creek, PPUD-015-84 hearing to consider the matter of access to the proposed Honey Creek Associates Preliminary Planned Unit Development, consisting of 72 multifamily units located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE. As a result of a recent court decision denying condemnation of property owned by the Cormans along NE 23rd Street, which was needed to provide full access to the development, the City Council must now determine whether to retain the requirement for two full access roads to the site or whether to reduce that requirement to one major access along Jefferson Avenue NE and one gated, secondary, 20-foot emergency access along NE 23rd Street. Correspondence was read from Stanley A. Huseland, Trustee of Amos Huseland Educational Trust, 11107 Wood Court, Carmel, IN 46032. The letter advised that sole access to the 20 acres owned by the Huseland Trust in the Honey Creek-May Creek valley is via Devil's Elbow Road (NE 27th Street) which the City has closed. Mr. Huseland expressed strong objection to the closure, pointed out that the road failed after being widened during City sewer and road improvement projects in the canyon several years ago, and urged restoration of the original configuration of the road for use by local residents. Audience comment was invited. Representing Stanley Huseland, Amos Huseland, 1916 Edmonds Avenue NE, Renton, withdrew his opposition to emergency access along NE 23rd Street. He stated that he and his son were under the impression that the roadway referred to in the public hearing notice was Devil's Elbow Road, which, although now known as NE 27th Street, was formerly designated as NE 23rd Street on old maps. However, he urged that Devil's Elbow Road be restored by the City to its former configuration to provide access not only to areas to the north and east but to his undeveloped property as well. Referring to a vicinity map, Planning Manager Larry Springer provided background information regarding the proposal. He indicated that City Code requires direct access to a City street from all developments, and the Fire Code requires two means of access, one primary and one secondary, for any development consisting of three or more buildings located more than 200 feet from a public road. Fire Code requires that the secondary access be a minimum of 20 feet wide and paved. Secondary access alternatives were discussed by Mr. Springer. 1) NE 21st Street--additional right-of-way would be required and would generate additional traffic through a larger single family area; 2) NE 27th Street Devil's Elbow Road)--not viable due to instability; and 3) NE 23rd Street-- direct route to site and the preferred alternative for either full development or gated emergency access. Slope easements (2-5 feet) and a small retaining June 19, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 170 wall may be needed to stabilize the bank along the roadway. Mr. Springer advised that in its recent decision on the NE 23rd Street condemnation, the Court had indicated that the City must pursue condemnation on its own initiative and independent of the Honey Creek development. Due to low anticipated volume on NE 23rd Street, staff has recommended that further condemnation of property not occur and the 20-foot road be restricted to gated emergency access only. Noting that the proposed Honey Creek development has 72 units generating approximately 476 round trips per day, Mr. Springer compared it with other City projects approved with one primary access and one gated emergency access: 1) Victoria Hills--174 units with 856 round trips per day; 2) Cedar Ridge--138 units with 1380 round trips per day; and 3) Woodcliffe--300 units with 1475 round trips per day. Council President Stredicke expressed concern with approval of a sole access to the development due to potential impact from traffic on homes located near the entrance. Upon inquiry by Councilwoman Mathews, Mr. Springer confirmed that the City may have to condemn the 2-5-foot slope easement needed to develop NE 23rd; however, since impact on adjacent homes would be reduced by the narrower roadway, there is a possibility of reaching an agreement with the property owner without legal action. Audience comment was invited. John Sullivan, 2633 NE 23rd Street, represented property owners on the south side of NE 23rd Street. He objected to additional traffic on NE 23rd Street due to narrow, 14-foot width; and he cited prior drainage and safety problems associated with the roadway. Chuck Velte, 12117 SE 96th Place, Renton, discussed the merits of improving Devil's Elbow Road for use as access to the subject site as well as to residents to the east who were cut off from direct access to the freeway and deprived of secondary access when the road was closed. Mr. Velte suggested that Urban Arterial Board funds be sought to improve Devil's Elbow Road before costs escalate further. Noting constant use of the roadway by ATVs and motorcycles, as a gathering place for teenagers consuming alcohol, and as a dumping area, Mr. Velte requested that if there are no plans to open the road for vehicle access, the least the City can do is install an effective barricade to keep people out. Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, indicated he has a Washington professional engineering license. Indicating his opinion that problems associated with Devil's Elbow Road have been exaggerated, Mr. Murray reported that his engineering survey of the roadway shows a slope of less than 10% for its entire length contrary to information provided by the applicant, and is well within the City's allowable slope criteria. He advised that the cost would be the same--$100,000--to improve either Devil's Elbow Road or NE 23rd Street to emergency access standards; however, improvement of Devil's Elbow Road would better serve the public interest since it could be widened for future public access while NE 23rd Street would remain a gated road. Bob Tomberg, 6005 Hazelwood Lane, Bellevue, property owner, asked Council to consider emergency access via NE 23rd rather than Devil's Elbow Road. He reaffirmed advice by expert engineers that access via Devil's Elbow Road is inadequate for the project, and maintenance costs would be high. Noting that the project has been unduly delayed, he urged Council to arrive at a timely decision on the matter. Tom Malmo, 12105 SE 96th Place, Renton, spoke in favor of improvement of Devil's Elbow Road as the best choice for access into the Honey Creek property, and indicated that before the City laid water and sewer lines in the area, Devil's Elbow Road was stable and served as access through the canyon. Upon Council inquiry, it was noted that notice of the public hearing was posted in the area of the site, published in the newspaper, and mailed to all parties of record. It was also clarified that Council had reaffirmed at the 75% annexation hearing on May 12, 1986, that if the 40-foot right of way for NE 23rd Street cannot be acquired, the development would not be allowed to proceed. Council asked about the City's obligation to provide access to developing properties. City Attorney Warren stated that the City has no legal obligation to keep any road open. Regarding the condemnation proceeding, he explained findings of the Court that the City had signed an agreement with the developer and had contracted away some of the City's power of eminent domain. If the City had wanted to acquire property for reasons of safety, traffic circulation, or other reasons within municipal June 19, 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 171 powers, the condemnation suit could go ahead. Mr. Warren referenced memorandum from Public Works Director Guttmann this date recommending that the City proceed with the condemnation of NE 23rd Street even if the Honey Creek Associates PUD is not developed to provide the most direct and least disruptive route to the single family residential area. Mr. Tomberg recalled that at the first public hearing on this matter, the public was supportive of the development to put an end to illegal dumping and other activities on the property. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Council indicated that since additional right-of-way on NE 23rd Street cannot be acquired, it appears that development will not be able to proceed. City Attorney confirmed that if conditions of the PUD cannot be met, conditions of Ordinance No. 4143, adopted on 4/4/88, will be self-executing and the PUD cannot proceed. He indicated that no further action is required by Council. (The ordinance approved the PPUD and established a two year time limit for submission of a final plan excluding the time required for condemnation of property along NE 23rd Street.) No further action was taken by Council. RECESS OVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 9:36 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:40 p.m.; roll was called; all members present except Hughes. SPECIAL Police Chief Alan Wallis and Mayor Clymer presented a service award plaque PRESENTATION to John Seaman who has completed 500 hours as a volunteer with the Police Police: Special Department. Congratulations were extended to Mr. Seaman who has served Presentation the department since 1987, assisting with vacation house checks, speed watches, fingerprinting, and alarm maintenance. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, indicated that all progress Citizen Comment: Webb - comes from people who are not willing to accept the City as it is and are Council Microphones and striving for improvement, promoting efficiency in government, and hunting Procedures for honest answers. Noting recent replacement of Council microphones with lapel mikes, Mr. Webb reported that the audience still cannot hear Council discussion, and he urged that Council change its policy and procedure for Council meetings to allow audience comment during abbreviated Council meetings as well as at work sessions. He also requested that executive sessions be held following regular Council meetings so that the audience can leave instead of after abbreviated meetings when audience members are waiting for work sessions to begin. Citizen Comment: Carson Frank Carson, 1737 Lake Avenue South, Renton, asked for a completion date Mosquito Abatement for the wildlife census required by the hearing examiner prior to start of and Compression Brakes mosquito abatement program in the Valley area. He expressed concern with delays in the spraying program due to health hazards associated with mosquitoes. Advising that the City's ordinance prohibiting the use of compression brakes by trucks is not being enforced, Mr. Carson supported use of revenue from recent license fee and utility increases for additional police services. Upon Council inquiry regarding status of mosquito spraying program, Mayor Clymer agreed to ask Parks Director John Webley to provide a report. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. CAG: 89-041, May City Clerk reported bid opening 6/15/89 for May Creek/Canyon Oaks Storm Creek/Canyon Oaks Drain; 3 bids; engineer's estimate: $41,000.00. Refer to Utilities Committee. Storm Drain See later action.) Annexation: Duncan Planning Division requested public meeting be scheduled on 7/3/89 to consider the 10% notice of intent petition for the Duncan Annexation located in the vicinity of NE 44th Street and 110th Avenue SE. Council concur. Utility: Water Pressure in Public Works/Utilities Engineering recommended water pressure zone change North Renton in the North Renton industrial area to improve fire protection. Refer to Utilities Committee. ii0TicE RENTON CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 19, 1989 AT 7: 30 P. m. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH TU CJNSIDER: THE QUESTION OF LIMITING ACCESS ON NE 23RD STREET TO EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY AND HAVING NORMAL INGRESS AND EGRESS LIMITED TO JEFFERSON AVENUE NE FOR THE HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PPUD-015-84) AND REZONE (R-014-84) LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE NE (AKA SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY). VICINITY MAP 122 ND AVE. 1 ' I S.E. I111 1 1 w 1 II mod I 1 6.f..06iNWATQ I wu':EW' SIN . F M.1) g \ p 1 1 lr—PUGET SOUND E wE 8 LIGHT UTILITY E MN N.L 11'H IT, 1j 9ANI\' 1 9-4 S ING. FAM. 1, I' TOMBERG 7 i j PROPERTY ma. 7Grn—, W I 1 Y. N BON I j WI.--- C z a o O VACASJT 1 0 w c I is FORE M SPACEI' _ \ ittexistingR-1 zone Z t:, ,': 7-. o i 1 1 If( Ij KI 11I --.N. 1 SEATTLE CITY LI IT L—f 1 1 UTILITY ESMNT. p f 1I SING. M f I L/ I / RENTON-IBIAOUAH 110.N c 1 '\, I L IN2. 1 jTN•T. N 1t 1 Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-25 I1 The removal, mutilation, destruction a r n i n or concealment of this notice is a mis- demeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. CERTIFICATION 14earir June Icl, tci89 To consiGler : The Question m+ting ACGeSS on J-E. 236-9S-{ to Emer9enay access ©r\ly And 1-4-a ir Normal Ir reas e.gre s L.irrlited to Je- rson Avenue_ t.1.E . -for The Honey Gree tc, assoc.iet s Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPuD- ot5 - S4) A.nd Qescone CR-ol4 -84) 1--ocafed in the ViGirli{). of 2200 Bloch ©1.. Jefferson a renve N. e , 6 A rnbert 'Proper-1-r t_..oc.ai-ions of Post'nos Lbr,e June. 8, In1Oq t) kcgrrinciton PI . N•e . 4 nl•E . 23' St. Cs.E. corner) 2) 1 ©o t. FT- Frrnrr‘ 4.arrin9tvn PI. N.E . 4 N.e . 23'' St• 3) 2.Qo t. FT. Pram 4grrin3ibn Pl. N •E . r N.E . 23e-Ei S-t- 4) 1-4arrin9-Eon Pl. N.E . * N.E. 23"' St. ( N .W. ernes-) 5) N• E • 2.3'-'.21 Pl . Front of House 28oS G) t.l•E . 23r1. St. Front p{ 11ouse. #1, 2117 7) I-1 a r r i n -k r, PI. N.S . t wiEsa n N-cause ?;#s 2132 4, 2 2c:to H alrrivwJ-kon Pt . N.G. sF N.E. 2l s-t St. CEast) N.E . 21 F3etwee n N-ouse #'s 2.1532 S 4 zgo 5 10) 1-1arrn9inn PI. N.E .N.E. 21 st St. CWest) it) Narrin9i'on Circle N.E . Front o} house *r 2017 2) Harrinc9tor Ave . N.E . g. Je fj.rson Ave. N.E 3) J e f ie r-s o n Ave. N.E • , too + F f. Frt3 rn 14-a rr- i i-o n Ave.. l4) L-}arr-initon Ave. N.E. Front Rouse. tt et l a t5) Kirkland Ave. N.E .Kirkland PI . iV.E . la) kirk Iand PI • N.E t~rbn+ of House # 2023 l7) N.E. 24.12 St. Be+wen F6nuse. # 5 z 7zq 4 2733 le) 41•E . 27111 St. , 300± Ft. Frrnm Edmonds Ave. N.E ic) t25ii Aven e. S.E . S. E . 104 '' Si- . 20) t 2 4 ' Avenue S.E . S . E . no ti) I22 '^d Av .ru 8.E . S. E . ciGti Pt c • i4d),41 c 6"L tot', 1-0-•%-ir 770 tvo el/IA-um/4' ru bl i c. 14ea ri nac. June iq, q89 To Consider: The, c uesfion o4 Limiting Access on N.E. 23r2i 3-4 . to Erner.3ency access Only Ano1 1-Ia ir Normal IncareccesEagrt2sLimitedt-o Jeff rson Avenue. N.E . -for The 1-}cDne.yC,r+ee.k. AS .nGi.atk=?..s Preliminary Planned Unit Development PPU D - c515 - p4) And Qesone C R-ot4 -ea) 1-•-c•c•al- c=1ivt +LieYiGini• cnk 2200 I< a n-I-a To rnber Pro pr.-y L-oc.a4ions c hf. Post rtjs Dc,ne June 8, nag 1-karrincittin PI . I.I.E . . 23rot Si. Cs.a. Gorner') R,,c G(lint 2) 100 t. rT. Frkorn 144.arrin9it:$4.4 Pl. Dt.% . 4 N.e . 25rti 13CA 4q'8q 3) 2(3© t r T. F n.r*.i µa hri rirx,r) PI. PJ 6 _ e N.E . 23rd S.} • E4rnondb Ave " 4) 14arrin9-1- n Pl. N.E . 4 N.E. 23ro1 St• ( N .W. Corner) 5) N• E • 2 3Y Pl . F r©n t c 1+0 use fit 2 80 5 N.E . 23rd St'. Front pf. F{ouSe # 2.-117 7) 1-1 a r r-i lleinn PI. N.E. I3 t wege n itc,use *I7 2132 4, 2200S) 1-1 srri n PI . N. . I N.E. 21 S1 St. C E ast) 61) N.E . 21`'-t 3etween 1-1,ouse #'s zez S 4 2.go5 to) 4arri- 9tnn PI. N.E.N.E. 21 st St. (west) 11) karrin9fon Gir.le N.E . Fcnnt o} house # 20%7 12) Harrington Ave . N.E . 4 Jeff .ran Ave. 13) Je Person Ave. N.E . , loot Ft. From 4}arr iv 9#, n Ave. N.E . 14) H.arrin9ton Ave. N.F. Front o} Rouse- 1t QtiS 15) kirti rd Ave. N.EN.E .Kirtcland P . N.E to.) kirk land PI. N.E Prbr1+ I-kouse * Zoz3 17) N.E. 24 St. 3e+wen 23z9 42733le) J.E . 27 St. , 300 ± Ft. Frtnm Edn-Notds Ave. N.E lq) 12 51i ,Lve.nue. S.E . . S.E . l 041b 2o) 12. 4110 Avenue. S.E . S. to© t j Si--. 21) I22 ._d 8.E . 4 S. E . ciGtif. Pl , A`• 9 S t/9s.07 rbib- ''*'‘ 30 r Q r.20B•727 65fl• 3707 1 393.Gs > _ _ 1 9S t Ba.s1 85.4-3 72..E ; n E 3 2- 72 3 S 88-/5-152. 1 yob V o V 1 0 6 i Ati T ro 9ro q, cp 8 Iv+ 2 3 p,o Lo o ^ tip 2 3y Q0'0 33 Do80 .23 b E i 914 12' Z 005° D0p6° ' 53 ' i 669g• 8 O R. S R. 9 i 5 1 ch., 003° 0 • 72.3 15 w f/ 1 3doI 72 2 0 m 0 sz9..64 0900o 4 T 1-1 • A S 1 . 019210 s? Ag- N 2 72.9 !J b . o• ao>4- s. 9 4 to P I Z i Io N to ° a 14 13 q I.2 1 o10 D/DOv015a v v/ro 17 P, 16 c;101060 o l 40 ch 0/3°p!2 0 y 95 86.38 0/70tp kb 0/60 1y 4 S. 88 -//506•/TE. 67 ..31 72.29 08.9G ' 3 ` 72..9 4 q 7z.3 Z G/ 1 ! 7z.29 ° j 72.3/ o% q0 0 3 tx ,0 79 J7W80ZQ10 /Z94.97 23$ p " 1 op lb o ' P 19 q SZS a. 21 :, a 20• N 00° M Ail, I2625240 : 0 23 22 ; 0000 $ y40 - o. 0Z 1Z L3 1230 VI. p1 B E 07-&' OZa° 35 0224 ov° k /yjg 30. 1 p 35. 03 9./4 _, Bc./! 74.73 q• 5754 6 2 21 30,56 30.45 30.09 0kl Q fleg 0*._ c31 ,e=80o a N8B'b /(oW h 8° ZZO 3/0.32 e`800 /5S.//v N 17 h h 0\ 09A.. 4 t y 0/-r0 g M O 72.04 72.?f1 SS9/ 3BZ7 P 50.8(0 31? 11 s Z M j39 ao`Ly9 `fl 3y 2. b IQ• 44: z 4Z19 , Z '' i 5c94y P. Pis`•Z5 o s m k, o oN. ' o ° 14 q° i 15 0 , 16 90 9 10 11 Z 12 13 ao g$ZZ0a ''` gZ 0 19°p230 N /094 v y 01ao a ' 14 0 w , g• , ,0 t- p ! to Zg1 10 q So -F 25 ZS 1,87 B9 0 00 0110 QlZ°01 9 4, 115S 994 7Z it rj1. ° ' ' o 47i i 28/.B+ D O 4/ as-,l-o9 01 I 0 7coso o7 f•ZisosoOo7/i-tSN N 4 jr,' p. o ssososesn- ro• 70 I 1 70 70 W RI N 6 1 0 . tl) kiM o0 , 0 l 04 En: 3 N p 0( v h1 h1 h: N 4 A7 .' Zy' I,tr. ee-,e os c n1U \ - 070OS1^' o 20 oo o H 1 o N b - Z^I p a O v , u' D c' 0• 35 2 o O1 a a013V e Cam, iso 244 or a as-.6-/ c 3/.07 so S.vs' 2'S,20 ZS 70 0-5 30 o• ZgAc co t0ZyFIWv3tk` 1 te,I r b it CV 1 I 1kW N 64 N p II W+ it e`' p\ c 3 P 6 0 1 0 ti c N ON 30 Aleo0 C. /' OOI b` 41 V 1 5 nc. 0'® % ,I L 03 Yl I n of I2, N c• O 01I lei• N 19 I 6 It2/81248 M ,., /30'4z 68 O 7i0609071'-1,'o'4i - 'I 67606.09 e., JQ w rs•.9 ns w isa Ns, s,o N 76 06 09 0 7/S 9O'M ST 63 s ,o NE. 21ST_,, ,, 4.50. 2.sa zs/ SO 3S•7o s°ytl 2 I" 20 G 2.5/ „,ae/ sJ w 2Jo.o3lsiJ I\__ O • B M c l N 1 1^ Nr1tofoZ0`/ -[l v N a at Lo73-4 tor l i L,, 3 Z Y b' % 17 L Nl Lor t1;0 1 o.n ` !Q.Z 132. J6 0' 7 7 20 L 1$ a„. : 0 1 a 1. a M .OP N 4 •:ro7J 7I' / M er d h ao.e3[s.) eo gW:- h oIm y n y > G. p•rr 7, V nve 9 2 ciso Gz.s/ N,88.1' 0.4 cw 3.3. y^ / 29.41 41 G .0., t w LA,. E•t5e REN770622093 SW. i Z cP 73-77 NOTICE RENTON CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC ON JUNE 19, 1989 AT 7: 30 P. M. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBER ; 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH TO CONSIDER: THE QUESTION OF LIMITING ACCESS ON NE 23RD STREET TO EMERGENCY ACCESS ONLY AND HAVING NORMAL INGRESS AND EGRESS LIMITED TO JEFFERSON AVENUE NE FOR THE HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PPUD-015-84) AND REZONE (R-014-84) LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 2200 BLOCK OF JEFFERSON AVENUE NE (AKA SANTA/TOMBERG PROPERTY). VICINITY MAP 122ND AVE. A 11 I I S.E. 1 1 I i 1 II m I1, tea, 1 I I7 \ s p61N WAY Ciiir.. _ T 'fl 1 SIN ' FM!JI\ h 1 b—PUGET SOUND ''OwE I" d 8 LIGNT UTILITY '$MN N.E.!' i BT. p O W SING. FAM. i 4' 1 lTOME3ERG1I ' PROPERTY ING. 7CM- N ,g-T-1.., --___I. y I)j s o O T VACAEIT f 1 1 o o ORE N SPACEI' r 1 z;l existing R-1 zone Z T :. 4 SCH 6 1 1 iLJ1 _ 1 r . iThKi I I \ 1 f SEATTLE CITY I ,NT L_J ` \ 1 I.....UTILITY ESMNT n I I \\ I I rRENTOI.1-IS f1A0UAN Ip \,\ II 111, \usinii.AII1NIONl.1 TN T. 1 1 I,' 41 H 7_111_.1 1L Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-2 01 lb The removal, mutilation, destruction a r n i n or concealment of this notice is a mis- demeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 19th day of June, 1989, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: The question of limiting access on NE 23rd Street to emergency access only and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue NE for the Honey Creek Associates Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PPUD-015-84) and Rezone (R-014-84) located in the vicinity of 2200 Block of Jefferson Ave NE. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION: June 9, 1989 4ccf * SO10 I 19 June 1989 12117 S.E. 96th P1. Renton, WA.98056 RE: Access Road..,N.E. 27th/120th Pl. S.E. (Devils Elbow Road) Federal Collector Arterial #1334 . To the Renton City Council: Since the subject of tonights hearing is primarily access, I thought it appropriate to discuss the merits of the (N.E. 27th/120th P1. S.E.) here after referred to as, "The Road",not only from it's use as an access road to this proposed development, but as a means for all of us to the East of this area who are cut off from direct access to the Interstate Freeway as a result of the road closing. We are forced to drive through the increasingly congested Highlands area, adding unnecessarily to the traffic congestion and risking increased risk of accidents. As a result of this closing, emergency vehicles have only one access to our area, none can get directly to us via the Freeway I formally request that the Director of Public works investigate the eligibility of the road for Urban Arterial board funding. My information indicates the City of Renton did request UAB assistance for the Sunset road improvements but not for the road. At or about that same time period, your former public works director claimed you (The City of Renton) could not afford to repair the road (N.E. 27th) and moved to have it closed. According to contacts I made at King County and the Washington Department of Transportation in Olympia the road is eligible for Urban Arterial board Funding. I brought this to the attention of this body at an earlier hearing, but it appears it was never pursued. I hear of escalating figures on the repair the road, but no attempts to obtain Federal or State funding. There was even an innovative suggestion by our current Public Works director that a bridge might be in order on the road. The flip side of this issuse is the current status of the closed road. It is my understanding that according to the City of Renton, the Road is closed. While that might be true on your books nothing could be further from the truth. A continuing stream of offroad ATV's and Motorcycles cruise up and down the road. There have been numerous teenage parties where alcohol and possibly drugs have been consumed. The dumping of garbage is an on going problem. I personally found a dead rat on the roadway. My neighbors tell of suspected cultist holding Satanic rituals in the Devils Elbow area of the road. Barriers have been vandalized and compromised. After my repeated requests, the Renton Engineering Dept. placed a small sign warning of no motorized vehicles.. Fortunately, they placed it to one side or it would have been run over by now. I recently took my own hammer and nails and repaired the barriers after they were trashed by funseekers, with no respect for laws or others property. The bottom line, if you are going to close the road, then close it. Put barricades up the stop people. The existing barriers are ineffective and poorly designed. Thank you, 0,aibL • Chuck Velte Page - 2 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: June 19, 1989 TO: Mayor Earl Clymer Members of the City Council RECEIVED FROM: Kenneth E. Nyberg Community Development Director ANN 1 9 1989 RE: Honey Creek PUD CITY OF FiEN1ui N.E. 23rd Street CITY COl1NCIL File R-014-85, PPUD-015-85 PROBLEM 16 The City, as a result of a recent court decision on the condemnation of N.E. 23rd Street, must determine whether the decision made by the City Council to require N.E. 23rd Street as a second means of access for the Honey Creek PUD development should stand or be replaced with a condition requiring that N.E. 23rd Street be used only as a gated secondary emergency access for the development. ISSUES Code Requirements: The Renton Municipal Code requires all developments to have direct access to a City street from a development. The Fire Code requires the provision of a fire apparatus access road and when a complex has three or more buildings located more than two hundred (200) feet from a public road, the Fire Code requires two (2) means of access for a development. Generally, an attempt is made to separate the access roadway from the primary access point to the development to ensure emergency access to a development in case the primary access point is closed during an emergency. The City has allowed developments to have one primary access point and allowing the second access to be identified as gated secondary emergency access provided that the access meets the minimum Fire Code standards (20 feet in width and paved). In the City two examples of developments having one primary access with a gated emergency access are Cedar Ridge and Woodcliffe. Access Alternatives: Access has been a major issue for the development. Over time, as a community develops, it may find that development patterns allowed in the past create problems as infill parcels are developed. Such is the case with the subject development (Phase I). In this case, the property is surrounded by low density multiple family developments to the south and single family 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Memo To Mayor Clymer a Council Members Honey Creek PUD June 19, 1989 Page 2 residential developments to the west and a ravine to the north and east. The roadway network developed in the area over time has segments with sufficient right-of-way while other segments have insufficient right-of-way. Further, several of the roadways are, by current standards are substandard. Alternative access points for the development, in addition to the Jefferson Avenue N.E. access, have been analyzed. The following briefly discusses these earlier alternatives: a.N.E. 2lst Street The development of N.E. 21st Street was considered. As with other alternatives, development of the roadway would require additional right-of-way and upgrading of roadways not only along the N.E. 2lst corridor but also IIarrington Place N.E. The result will be carrying the development traffic through a larger portion of the single family area west of the site than other suggested alternatives. b.N.E. 27th Street (Devils Elbow) This alternative has been reviewed several times. The development of access from this roadway is not a viable alternative due to the instability of the roadway. At this time, it is not safe for either primary access or emergency access. c.N.E. 23rd Street This alternative provides a route which impacts the single family neighborhood less than the N.E. 21st alternative and provides a more direct route for emergency vehicles attempting to service the development. Ideally, this roadway should be developed, in addition to Jefferson, to allow two points of access for the daily traffic generated by the development. Should a decision be made not to develop the access to allow daily traffic, consideration should be given to developing the existing right-of-way as a gated emergency access point. The latter decision, as with the development of a full access point along this right-of-way, may require additional property and/or slope easements in order to provide sufficient bank stabilization on either side of the roadway. The need for bank stabilization will depend upon the design of the roadway based upon engineering studies. The additional right-of-way and/or slope easements are necessary since the use of any structure to retain the banks must be outside the twenty (20) foot paved roadway section required under the Fire Code. The amount of right-of-way required for this option will depend upon the selected method of bank stabilization (rockery, concrete retaining wall or other acceptable means) along the roadway. This has been verified in a conversation with the Acting City Engineer. Necessity of Second Access(Direcl or Emergency) Questions have been raised periodically during the review of the development as to whether or not other types of development, such as a single family residential project, would require another access. The answer is yes. Any development of the site would warrant development of Memo To Mayor Clymer al Council Members Honey Creek PUD June 19, 1989 Page 3 a second means of access. At a minimum the second access should be identified as a gated emergency access roadway. A second alternative is necessary to ensure that emergency vehicles have an alternative access to the site, in times of emergency, should the access through N.E. 16th street to Jefferson Avenue N.E. be blocked. Access along N.E. 23rd Street allows opportunities to access the site from the north or south along Edmonds Avenue N.E. and that the developed access will be of sufficient width to handle the necessary emergency vehicles. CONCLUSION Of the access alternatives discussed above, it appears that N.E. 23rd Street provides the most reasonable means of a second access to the development. Ideally, this roadway should be developed as originally required as part of the Honey Creek PUD approval by the City as an access alternative to Jefferson Avenue N.E. for daily traffic from the development. This would provide two means of access to the site, spreading the traffic impact among the adjacent developments to the west and south as well as providing an additional unimpeded access point for emergency vehicles. To do this, however, would require the City to use its eminent domain powers of "the public use necessity". The City has wished to be reimbursed for its costs in buying the necessary right-of-way and so negotiated with the developer. The Court, however, in a recent decision, has told the City that if it is to use its condemnation powers to acquire N.E. 23rd Street it must do so on its own initiative independent of the Honey Creek PUD development. Staff believe that because of the apparent difficulties with acquisition and reimburse nent to the City, as well as the relatively low numbers of trips generated per day by Phase I of the PUD that an alternative to developing the roadway to accommodate daily traffic would be a decision to restrict time access along N.E. 23rd Street to gated emergency access only. The use of N.E. 23rd Street as a means of emergency vehicle only access, better serves the public interest than the other alternatives available at this time. It reduces the amount of intrusion into the single family neighborhood to the west and reduces impacts to single family residences which may have been built too near the adjacent roadways. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council revise the decision of April 14, 1986 issued for the Honey Creek PUD, deleting the requirement that N.E. 23rd Street be developed as a second access point to the development and replacing the condition with a requirement that N.E. 23rd Street be developed as a gated emergency access point only for the development. The development of the N.E. 23rd Street may require the dedication of additional property, unless necessary slope easements are granted to the City, in order to provide adequate slope protection on either side of the roadway or the paved portion is reduced a sufficient amount to allow the construction of a vertical concrete retaining wall along portions of the southern edge of the right-of-way. The amount of dedication or easement will depend upon the method of stabilization used for the banks along the roadway. CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: June 16, 1989 TO: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney FRON : Lynn A. G .1aLr , Public Works Director SUBJECT: NE 23rd Street and Honey Creek PUD Thi ; memo is in response to your correspondence dated May 1, 1989, in regard to street access to the proposed Honey Creek PUD. Question 1: Should the City acquire the NE 23rd Street right-of-way, even if the Honey Creek Associates PUD is not developed? Response: The answer is yes. This roadway section will be needed for whoever and whenever the subject property is developed. NE 23rd Street provides the most direct route and least disruptive route through the single family residence. This street access would also disperse the traffic impact at Jefferson Ave. NE access which routes passed Hillcrest Elementary School . A lesser traffic impact around a school location should be encouraged. Question 2: If NE 23rd Street cannot be used, what other alternative means of access to the property should be used? Response: If NE 23rd Street is not an option, then the less desirable alter- natives would be as follows: Alternate #1 : NE 21st Street between Jefferson Ave. NE & Harrington Place This roadway segment has an insufficient right-a-way problem. The easterly 130 feet has a 30-foot right-a-way and the westerly 125 feet of this roadway segment has a 60-foot right-of-way. The easterly half needs another 30 feet of right-a-way to match the westerly half. It is also needed to build to a roadway width that meets current standards. Another problem with NE 21st Street is that it passes through a single family residence creating increased traffic in a residential area neighborhood. Alternate #2: NE 27th Street & 120th Place SE also known as the Devil 's Elbow) This roadway, as you are aware, has been closed due to its instability. In its present condition, it is unacceptable for Lawr?nce J. Warren Page 2 June 16, 1989 primary and/or secondary emergency access. Based upon prelimi - nary investigation, it was estimated in 1988 by staff that it would cost $1,432,000 to construct a 28-foot wide roadway meeting current standards. The cost makes this option non- viable. The minimum right-of-way width required per ordinance is 50 feet for any of the alternatives above. An exception is 40 feet for one-way traffic on a hillside area. See City Code 9-1108 Section 7H. Question 3: What long-term planning and traffic problems does this PUD create for the City? Response: Phase I of the proposed PUD is 77 units which impact the accesses proposed above. This will generate an average weekday traffic of 508 vehicle trips per day with 40 trips in the AM peak and 49 trips in the PM peak hour. Phase II will not use this proposed access, but access to the east. The PUD will not cause a major impact on the existing roadways if we can disperse the access at two locations. If ve can provide further information, please let us know. CEM ad Attchments CEM 13 COMPARISON CHART SELECTED PROJECTS HONEY CREEK VICTORIA HILLS CEDAR RIDGE WOODCLIFFE No. of Units 72 174 138 300 Approximate No. of Trips 476 856 1380 1475 round trips) Primary Jefferson No. S. 26 St./ Royal Hills Dr. Grant Ave. Access Res. Access Street Type Res. Access Benson/Minor Res. Access Res.Access Arterial Access Revised 6/19/89 41111NAIrrilt__0: W 10 St o uT', E.'S1s N :.2 I: 't I s Qom.. I J, u r of w.I p, rc, o; Gov t. Lot 3 I. n 35.66 Acres Of a Ile,Lc E NUome' Li I I,I:. If1,.y1. I 17•,t^ I j,Lu w,.ly„) I E '/ wool.n T'' W• 1 Aa• I O11N /1/A/. f Q 1 TG I 1114i III. t/f III Y( 1 1• 11 rI. 1 e7,' I i„y ! '~ Red Samm IAInln9 Co'IncJ110A< 1 1 •N.E. 7251NA_St.. V K. I i i,oitt),314,dite,IIIU]At 1111,1705 A. CM. 041 At I I. L I I a.. b. 'A. L- - I liti 111 11U1 r}` N.E. 24TH Si r' ifiki rii il 6;5. t r00 g.-GDI Ulle• 'i; ., I •11 A•-J' I. 141 IS IS• 11 17 It', IS i, 14 13, It {' wi• J 7i v. -1 n a' 1 1 •, .t I 1 w I : l : H •1 , }-w 1 .r 9 I 10 2 I 2I. III 2I 21 21 t( 21 22 21 1 1 . 1"*„. II LtW]E 'A"tT -H r E .R ;E :D W tii t t 1r:II r i-L ,•w 1 - al tJ .f.• I ea.. 1 v,, • S! t r• i St) S ecilis g ....• N.E. 23R0 :. ay Y.. } •, ° I' I t a ? I I iie 1• te l0 3 a ' Ii P I 2 i 1 I e. s " I 1 1 I S 43 11 It O G 14 IS I' 1 ,11 „t- 1 n, —t-'•tlYmc•.7 Ghand cr Red . o 1. 011!: 1•,114403114071Aa!/71:V 1T:0.11/4 1 !I—••• a•_ i l • I f i I. I II I0t14!0.1/KI 0 t4 1S 2 r! Ie10( i I 1 t -_'_ 1._- _I--, war n( w I' 7----_ ln11a.^I' O:/Al J.IJAal JN'a -=••al I ...••. 11• ":• 1' i'^—,,. ' t. NE..-:_ _ :22NC=«,?Ic{_ST_:- 1-s. - _ `I. 2,t 11t I; •! Ii — , I'' . ca 41., I`'_ '1'iI I t 1 f Y r ( p1'7Ji-- e t-1..:. f7:,''I,..,1.....',.yin. 4 04sN c. I 0''c t 4 4 `' i •J' Ot}}t.III JJJ + I I ., '^-''' -.." I I ; 1 ." IN.E.= n« 2.1'ST jn.ST'1_?=s.a,. 1.,jot d 2°37, w' 7 I.rd 47i 1.aI.i YY YOGI IS, •. 4 , 2M _nl i 4 ; I1 TAa a•Ia.en lia 111 a, 1 IAl.:) I G a._ A}: . Jar ...It ' 1/4 : 10 , -.... 0 w:'J 4i1a•Y'Y4 JY_4r.!1 Tl•L., o, Rebetcn Sot qm,t STe,'..• u 1 itu1_'.s ,^J +••a a..D I S 6, •'+ ` 123ettAe ne ' . _77_. ° : La, 1"..‘" -..a---- ._ h._:13 ! r o Chester J 7.t.}: - ." f-E '• /( s Y,., E.:..... ' i y it L.O Hnrteu4h II 16 y 1 1 e C a g JCL NA, •`,•• '' :; t Z,., ,, , ) „ < Gt 1 3 I E,-. sv'7io G i : I ', Gs ui„F 1•".: ti 1 .i ' I :NE. 20TH '0' ST ''i"1 .a®._ ` •• O • I, ' 3 tart v , i'\ ,\SI!'t pi ii, 110 ,4,--'l'' Nt..•'V .' Z tt ` ,.e , t\ , `,t .•' t[;N 1 i r f i9II •'C li, \ ` CS d' t sf C li=H.—.+_' , i •, ) 6': J OAl' ' 1 . d 4 fi* ti G(-yON, I ' 'E Ip ! - 1 I• . 1'• q I c;'.. a: ., Al' 'V'1,- y t1a' t/ Z ' tr 4,—J 09 IN T'HEI. Tr-° a ., , a.\ t. a, .'e.,,s1 `/ ,``.+ ! o 9. C)- 2)) J a I14't T." I n,.; • 7 n 1 \ Y• f S t nntlro J Miller N.E. 19TH S1. n i.,,L 4^ 5l. a 4'+;,GtG , o L i it ly p Ni 01 M. l 7:.;J 0 ` 7 t . 1. y",` ., e.• 44.• ':' 1hti Z,.i•} Z 7 =,s '`--v TR.'CC • sty. g 0.`t .I;' II u'' 1L_J" "fJe ii s 1 ••' ' , O 0 r: i N,E.IR .,,_ i-- ce I. N.E. 18TN :: p'. c ID 1 l r M' 1 u 1 1 1 u 1 o-e c li - 1 I itWr' .,. 7'4CIk 7iW' 1 ' 1 ,op ' t I . aw ^ II' I. i ,a ry/ -. L", `14,-; Z"~ "!` • 0 Z 1% 1 Nort Highl W : a csAcI1ands 3 . Park 10117 t ti I I• 16 r1 /,//11'\y\v 11 1.4a : 1 I:..L11 / .a 7 ' may- a .'A'- 1 S .I ••r m--T ` i(/!,},,-- 9{ it I II 1 III I' SA. .+ S. VICINITYMAPNE Etil, I11 ! .».; a` y4 "=_ - .1, ( IkIiiq : ii i 11 ln------.--., dEuti...;', , wr.rwnr u..r L,_ ... ‘ ., „....,. :., 10 ( u' l NA I.,.,, , a1.11n0 R-1 ron• Y 11 w.. .' " 4..r....d V. \\1/c '•,/ ' I l H. 'h. J L:' e .run mom 1X\ it/ie i,' / I t="L i -' /-Zi--• _- • 4I M••rrb•11 11%11 I'' A'. i), N\\,,aid1\ I 1 '\ 1 \\\\ \ 1 v aJ t(• \ LOT'Y':]1„ACRES ( 1 n.• \ s' 1' * k AV li\ss' s\ \ \*'. \\V' .\ All \ . ' I 7-\ SA_100 TN AA. ' ..::c\N '41„::•., s•,,\ \ \\ % I.,. 1 It 11\ \ t \1, , .;:•\.‘ STASET s ', s' NN. '- ‘\ N\'' Ott‘\ \\\\N% ...'..\. \ 1 , f--------_-_-_:.---.\ so.o. \\\ \ \,.......j)•it :i( Nk:\'. 4 ,,\ 0 \‘ I 1( 7------N-___ \ s. s.• 1.1s.' s•.::."2.:',:‘*..‹':::::‘,:..: Ss's, s,' 'N, '`. s.\---- - .... S.: --..:-............±pi;//•-•\\:' , 7. 1 nti' * T1( \_ 4. s. 111.1% ,;\ . V , .\\\''' s . \‘' 0 \' V.k\....2.-_ - :-. •-_-... ._:__-_-,i... .-- , )) ).!,..,/ 11 4..\ ‘.'.,...‘\,. .: .---.:--•_.-:-::_______- -I ^.I it iu+..••. 1 , \ii I.q 1 ,1 r. I I' dra71J LLL•( q-7\i''''if(lit 1 . wIlit - -.. 0..1, ) N. ; \\\\,\\. 7,-,...-- t 1" 4I , I.I, - • `1.f11r°flO.`[ r\ . •''...., ,,,.:‘,..\. .‘\:',\%%‘, \ l, ‘ i i ' t / i ( 1 i'- . A ' ' 1 I lir . 1` .( v...",, I' AV. ....m.-... .,—,:..-_ N., 'Ns l'‘V‘ i' b.\\ . ' : 2\.,•‘.,.\ i trx -'\‘ i 1 t,..• . •,...... , 411Mr(1:11 _ , NH:\ t\`01\%\\\ ' '.„ , ‘ s••• 1 .1 , . 1I ORM Y•C[10. 1\ li11 \\ ///31 ,•I I atn[.Ja.•,vr atcoy. 14t i.i Vitt.;I i k„::_z. 4., Lo,A':/4.04 fillA ft./ 1 , 1\) .:• ( / .-_` iig i 0..•,., . , • 1 I, I ,. .,.: c ,..--,, ,..„...,4).:,„. r *yr Air • • some 7:.--., . 41 - Al ‘ i • •t C.-\:'::......-.....,----,,,......--N I ' 7" _-.,...,... r" Z ._t t rQ ems;. I 1 ,' , ` \ =! _—! ;,, 4--itt I\ ., ,., or it JEFFERSON lirl"- 77— ...-- — "---:—••••t-- • • • .0, 1 ' t ( ';, : , s • . \ N-----:;:--;'-- .., - ):(,' ' r'. , } I v, AVE.Ka w al•Ilnp R-2 zone C-DI U 1LLi,q_i u r' O`— —'' I 1L 1 , I:,uiJ - "10 t. ems, AMOS HUSELAND EDUCATIONAL TRUST 11107 Wood Court Carmel, IN 46032 June 15, 1989 OITY OR 111NTON Ms. Maxine E. Motor, CMC JUN 1 5 1989 City Clerk, City of Renton r Mill Avenue South CITY R ;Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Honey Creek Associates PPUD-015-84 Hearing date: June 19, 1989 Dear Ms. Motor: I am the trustee of th ee Amos Huseland Educational Trust, establis hed byits namesake--mysake -my father--for the educational benefit—of his children and grandchildren. The trust is owner of about 26 acres in L1iu Nuatay Creek-May creel valley. Its only road access is by N. E. 23rd Street, which thecityhasclosed. By this closure the city has rendered the market value of the trust essentially wort.hlAgapropertyy Ag a trust asset, its only purpooc is to be sold to mee t the educational needs of Mr. Huseland's family.Y As a property owner whose property is absolutely dependent upon this road access, I strongly object to any closure of the road. It is the city's obligation to maintain this access to the properties in the canyon. The road failed following sewer and road improvements made in the canyon a few years ago. An attempt was made to widen the canyon road to modern standards without providing the necessary anti-erosion engineering and Construction. The forces of nature did to the new wide road what was predictable--reduced it to the narrow road on the narrow base that existed before. Reversing these engineering errors will cost money. But the cost would be manageable if the city would restore a minimum access road rather than the wider road recently created. We would be happy with the old canyon road that existed for years, protected with warning signs, slow speed limits and guard rails for the sake of safety. We object to limiting access to N.E. 23rd Street to emergency access, because the city's obligation goes beyond the interest of the Honey Creek Associates property. My father, Amos E. Huseland, who is 88 years of age, may appear at the hearing personally to make these points. But by this Page 2 letter, I want the record to reflect our objections even ifhei3nnnhlstohmIhijy, ' MU to COVOnt aotidri by the city LU - restnra full access to this road. Sincerely, 14<telit4t,f( Stanl A. Huseland, Trustee cc: Amos E. Huseland 1916 Edmonds Avenue Renton, Washington 98056 III 1 ifigOne North Capitol, Lower Level Indianapolis, IN 46204 PRINTING (317) 236-8383 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL From Fax # (317) 638-2541 TO: Job No. MXiiv E. MoTO,r Phone #: ( 04) 2 3 5'— 2 S/ 3 Ci7r Cedeic CI Ty of &Vivi FROM: STNLCy 4. f7U5EL44/1) phone #:(/7)c 3- 1/733 There are a total of 3 pages (including cover page). Our machine Is a Ricoh. If you do not receive all pages in good condition, call (317) 236-8383. Ask for the operator below. Operator: Time: Date: Immediate Reply: Yes No END - RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting June 12, 1989 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; KATHY A. KEOLKER- COUNCIL MEMBERS WHEELER, TONI NELSON, NANCY L. MATHEWS, JOHN W. REED. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEN HUGHES AND TRIMM. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; ATTENDANCE ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; RUBEN NIETO, Personnel Director; DAN CLEMENTS, Finance Director; LT. DENNIS GERBER, Police Department. PRESS Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News APPROVAL OF MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL MINUTES COUNCIL APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JUNE 5, 1989. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Building: 1988 Uniform Building Division requested adoption of 1988 Uniform Building Code, Code Updates (Building, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, Plumbing, Swimming and Uniform Housing Code. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Pool, and Housing) Claim: Minott, CL-25-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $165 filed by Saundra Minott, 4128 Tamarac Drive South, #341, Seattle, on behalf of Roosevelt Montgomery for replacement of personal property allegedly not returned after jail term 05/05/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Fortin, CL-26-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $250 filed by Louis Fortin, 2817 30th Avenue South, Seattle, for damage to motorcycle allegedly caused when struck by City truck (05/31/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Finance: City Code Finance/City Clerk requested revision of Fee Schedule, Chapter 41, Title V, Revision, Fee Schedule Business Regulations, of City Code to correct existing errors. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. PUD: Preliminary. Honey Finance/City Clerk recommended public hearing be set on 6/19/89 to Creek. PPUD-015-84 consider limitation of access to the Honey Creek Planned Unit Development, located in the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE. Council concur. Fire: 1988 Uniform Fire Fire/Fire Prevention requested adoption of 1988 Uniform Fire Code. Refer Code to Public Safety Committee. Plat: Final, Henderson Hearing Examiner recommended approval of Henderson Homes, Inc. Homes, Inc., FP-023-89 Summerwind Division #3 final plat for 32 single family lots on 8.35 acres located at NE Sunset Boulevard between 139th SE and 144th SE, if extended, FP-023-89. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Rezone: Sunset Square Hearing Examiner recommended approval of Sunset Square (ONB) (Dochnahl) ONB) (Dochnahl), R- rezone and site approval of 1.41 acres located at the southwest corner of NE 121-88 4th Street and Bremerton Avenue NE from Office Park zone (O-P) to Business zone (B-1) for an addition to existing bank, R-121-88. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Appointment Board of Mayor Clymer reappointed John Dubois, 2907 Mountain View N., Renton, to Ethics a four year term on the Board of Ethics to expire on 12/31/92. Also reappointed are Donald Jacobson, 2919 NE 5th Place, Renton and Rev. Donald Hammond, 1707 Edmonds Avenue NE, Renton, to four year terms on the Board of Ethics to expire on 12/31/91. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # ' • AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING i SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Finance/City Clerk For Agenda Of June 12, 1989 Meeting Date) Staff Contact Maxine Motor Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Access to Honey Creek Associates Consent X Public Hearing PPTTD-015-84. Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Set public hearing Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A for 6/19/89 to consider access to Honey Creek Other Clearance Associates PPUD-015-84. Council concur. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) On June 5, 1989, the Renton City Council adopted the Planning and Development Committee report which recommended a public hearing be held to consider the question of limiting N.E. 23rd to emergency access only, and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue. Please concur in public hearing June 19, 1989. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: N.E. 23rd and Honey Creek PUD The Planning and Development Committee met on June 1, 1989 , to consider the city' s continued involvement in the condemnation of N.E. 23rd and the effects that abandoning the condemnation would have on the Honey Creek PUD.As one of the conditions of development, the Honey Creek PUD was required to acquire and develop one block of N.E. 23rd to the west of the Honey Creek PUD. The court has refused to allow the condemnation to proceed unless the city asserts more control over the condemnation project. The committee considered the questions of ingress and egress to the site. Beginning at the north of the project, the Devil ' s Elbow Road is presently unsafe, and the cost to make that road safe is not known, but it is known that it would be substantial . Additionally, there may be grade problems in getting from the elevation of Devil ' s Elbow Road to the building areas in the Honey Creek PUD. Proceeding towards the south, any possible ingress and egress along existing rights-of-way before N.E . 23rd is impossible because of the steep slopes . N.E . 21st would have the traffic coming out on the same street as would a direct exit to the south, thereby eliminating N.E. 21st as either a secondary means of access or a means of emergency access . The only potential means of access are N.E. 23rd and Jefferson Avenue. Jefferson Avenue will serve as a means of access to this property. The remaining question is to what extent N.E . 23rd should be used as more than emergency access. The original proposal was to have N.E . 23rd serve as only emergency access .In order to minimize the effects of traffic on the neighborhood around the southern exit, Jefferson Avenue, the Planning and Development Committee previously recommended that N.E. 23rd be expanded to full two-lane width, and the necessary right-of- way obtained. The Planning and Development Committee believes that a return to using N.E. 23rd as emergency access only, may be warranted. Before that step is taken, however, a full public hearing should be held on the question. Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee recommends to the full council that a public hearing be held to , consider the question of limiting N.E. 23rd to emergency access CC: )1L A...r 4(L)§ S c,. ,', •' et-. 4,P! F, i Planning and Deve _anent Committee Report Page -2- only, and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue. The Planning and Development Committee further recommends that the matter of payment of attorney's fees to the respondents in the N.E . 23rd condemnation be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review. DATED: June 5 , 1989 . hn Reed, Chairman Nancy Ma ews etfre&,,k e Kathy eolker-Wheeler LJW:as . CITY7 : 26 . Lune 12. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 163 MOVED BY STREDICKE AND SECONDED, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Vice-Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committed report recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4220 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 41, Fee Schedule, of Title V Planning: Land Clearing Administrative) of City Code by adding a new subsection relating to routine and Tree Cutting vegetation management permits. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Ordinance, Routine SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS Vegetation Management READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Permit Ways and Means Committee Vice Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report recommending approval of the following ordinance for first reading: LID: 329, S. 43rd Street, An ordinance was read relating to Local Improvement District No. 329, Bond Anticipation Notes authorizing the issuance and sale of local improvement district bond anticipation notes in the amount of $600,000 for Local Improvement District No. 329 pending the receipt of the proceeds of the local improvement district bonds authorized to be issued by Ordinance No. 3856, as amended; and providing for the sale and delivery of those notes to the U.S. Bank of Washington, National Association, Seattle, Washington. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Finance: Bidding and Ways and Means Committee Vice-Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a Contracting Policy and report recommending concurrence in the request of the Finance Director to Procedure establish a policy and procedure related to bidding requirements and contract execution for the purchase of goods, services and capital projects throughout the City. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. PUD: Preliminary, Honey Ways and Means Committee Vice-Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a Creek, PPUD-015-84, report recommending authorization for payment of the attorneys' fees for Condemnation --- Honey Creek NE 23rd Street condemnation proceedings in the amount of 6,500 to be reimbursed by Honey Creek Associates per the agreement. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Ms. Keolker-Wheeler clarified that payment must be made by the City within 30 days in response to Superior Court order; however, the City will be reimbursed by the developer. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Vice-Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 61027 through 61484 in the amount of $1,413,982.55, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 61042-61044 machine voided. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS SUBMITTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Community Services Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report Community Services regarding Program Management. The Committee met on 6/6/89 to hear a Committee presentation by the administration on the program management concept. The Program Management: administration plans to use the Community Services Committee as the general Concept Monitored informational clearing house for information on program management. Where specific subtopics would be better placed before another Council committee, then such a referral will be made by means of the consent agenda. When the Committee believes that a topic would be better heard by the full Council, or by another committee, then the Community Services Committee will make that recommendation to the full City Council. The city attorney discussed the ongoing negotiations with Boeing to arrive at a contract to pay the added expenses of handling the massive Boeing plan review and permit applications in a timely manner. It was noted that Boeing will be asked to pay the incremental cost necessary to add additional staff or to hire outside consultants. The Committee recommended that the full Council approve the contract with Boeing in concept, and refer the matter to the Ways and Means Committee for final review and recommendation to the Council. I WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JUNE 12, 1989 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second reading: Amending Fee Schedule re Routine Vegetation Management Permits The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: LID 329 Interim Financing (SW 43rd Street) POLICY AND PROCEDURE ON BIDDING AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS Referred 6/5/89) The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Finance Director's request to establish policy and procedures related to bidding requirements and contract execution for the purchase of goods, services, and capital projects throughout the City. ATTORNEYS' FEES FOR HONEY CREEK NE 23RD STREET CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS (Referred 6/5/89) The Ways and Means Committee recommends authorization for payment of the attorney's fees for Honey Creek NE 23rd Street condemnation proceedings in the amount of $6,500 to be reimbursed by Honey Creek Associates per the agreement. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 61027 through No. 61484 in the amount of $1,413,982.55; having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers No. 61042 through No. 61044 machine voided. L_ Kathy Ke lker-Wheeler, Acting Chairman Richard Stredicke, Acting Member Nan y Math s, Acting Member For. Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING, Dept./Div./Bd./Comm.For Agenda Of Meeting Date) Staff Contact `•"Ixire ?'`^tor Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Qk ' Consent 40 lirPublicHearing . rp )-015-a4, Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session Ammilift A. Other B._ C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Set public hearin!Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A 1oi : , 89 Lo consider access to Honey Creek Other Clearance Associates PPUb-015-84. Council concur. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) On June 5, 1989, the Renton City Council adopted the Planning and Development Committee ! report which recommended a public hearing be held to consider the question of limiting N.E. 23rd to emergency access only, and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue. Please concur in public hearing June 19, 1989. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: THIS COPY FOR YOUR FILES. 1I 1 mflSy 7 iiscr,' C1 T i i I Joseph L-10011S al l 0 verbabar McGuirkgrsp The protest was the latest in a And the beautiful young horses who Diane McMahon of Algona decided to Armstrong said a motel operator in one series by Operation Rescue as the By BRENDA DAY charged playfully in their fenced meadow hitch on to the train last winter, working town offered free rooms to the partici- U.S. Supreme Court considers a Staff Reporter against the backdrop of rolling green hill- for months to convert her hay wagon to the pants, but no one accepted the offer. challenge to the Roe vs. Wade There may be a more pleasant way to sides.covered variety, with the help of several "No one wanted to leave the train over- decision legalizing abortion. travel, but no one could think of it Friday "This has been one of the most satisfy- sponsors in South King County. night," Armstrong said. Among the abortion rights advo- as the '89 Centennial Wagon Train headed ing experiences of my life," said a teary- When it came time to roll last week, That's because at night, campfire enter- cates at the rally were Norma to Hobart from Issaquah with a warm sen- eyed Bob Armstrong of Olympia, one of McMahon enlisted the help of Lou Pittman tainment sessions feature singing, square McCorvey,41,of Dallas, who was doff and welcoming reception. the original organizers, who has traveled of Auburn and her two work horses, Ruth dancing and old-time fiddling, open to the " Jane Roe" in the high court's At a pace of 4 miles per hour, there was with the train since it left Tekoa, near the and Rita. public, landmark 1973 ruling,and Eleanor plenty of time to take in the sights, and Idaho border, May 17. I went on the train to be able to slow "It's a feeling you get," Armstrong Smeal, president of the Feminist some of the images,won't soon be forgot-. The train celebrates the Washington down for awhile," McMahon said. said. "I can't describe it." Majority and past president of the ten. Centennial this year by paying tribute to its For Jack Price, who operates Happy The wagon train hitches up in Enumclaw National Organization for Women. School children, families and senior citi- earliest settlers. Trails Horseback Riding Ranch in Enum- today for the trek to Buckley, which fea- Rescue the homeless; rescue zens lined the streets of Issaquah when the "Until the wagon trains came out; there claw,the wagon train is the best way to see tures a crossing of the Stuck River. the many thousands of hungry peo- 200-member train pulled out, smiling, were a few scattered trappers, loggers fell- "what this country is all about."From Buckley, the train will travel to ple and children that are already waving and cheering. ing trees," Armstrong said. "But it takes One small town welcomed the wagon Orting and Fort Lewis before arriving in here today," McCorvey said out- side the clinic in a message totheAllalongtheway,busy commuters pull- the women and families to settle an area." •train with a homemade potluck dinner,feat Lacey Friday. A celebration that evening ed over in their cars and got out to watch, The train that left Issaquah is actually a curing 18 different desserts, said Price, will feature equestrian activities, dancing protesters. "Think not about the women who choose to have the waving at the friendly "pioneers who lei- combination of two: the Tekoa group and another of the event's organizers, and music. surely passed them by.• ` ' • another that left Blaine May 26. I realize the people are what makes The final destination in Olympia is the right to control their own bodies Then there was the family that gathered ' Three other -trains' left: Vancouver, America great, he said. : ,,. Trails'equine center, with food and•enter- and destinies. You cannot choose on the hill in front of their home and held a Ocean Shores and Forks;and will eventu- All along the way,veterinarians, medics tainment there 2 to 10.p.m. Saturday. their destinies for them." U.S. flag that waved-slowly in the cool ally,meet in Lacey June 16 for a June 17 and horseshoers have volunteered their A cowboy breakfast will be 7 to 10 a.m. Those arrested were booked on wind. • -parade to Olympia.., > • ..••.: time to help keep the train moving.- Sunday at the.Trails._ ' trespassing charges; and many refused to post$500 bail or to iden- tify themselves, Plourde said. win510Couple, .s' et ac s condo road plan Inside •mph.Details,page A6. was improper because the develop- "you should not put the desires of a 20-foot strip of the Cormans' ContentsByKATHYHALLerwascallingtheshots.out-of-town developers over the property. StateaffReporter Ann Landers A6 Given the adverse court ruling, needs of your own citizens." The. proposed 13-acre, 72-unit : Thousands of Seattle commut Births A6 Randy and Cathy Corman took the City Council decided last week The battle has been going on condominium project is nestled in - err are avoiding'traffic snarls, ,. Business A9 cdn City Hall and won—at least for to consider alternative access since last year, when the City the floor of the Honey Creek valley staying in shape and saving park- Classified Ads 66 the time being. routes that wouldn't involve con- Council established an extension of near Hillcrest Elementary School ing fees' by commuting to and Editorials - Al The young northeast Renton cou- demning the Cormans' land. Northeast 23rd Street as the sec- and North Highlands Park. The ' ' from work by bicycle. And local Lottery A6 ple challenged the city's right to The new' plan would increase' ondary access into the Honey primary access is off the relatively governments are starting to look National All condemn part of their back yard to traffic on Jefferson Avenue North- Creek Planned Unit Development, level Jefferson Avenue Northeast, at bicycles as part of the region's Northwest A7-A8 build an access road into a pro- east, and the council set a public a condominium project approved but the hilly terrain made it diffi- transportation system.Details, Obituaries A6 ' posed condominium development. hearing for June 19 on the alterna- by the city's hearing examiner in cult to design the secondary access Page A7. Sunday Special A3 Sports B1 They accused the city of putting tive proposal. 1986. route. Weather State A7-A8 the needs of an out-of-town Bevel- Though the Cormans vowed to But while the hearing examiner The Cormans and their neigh- ,,. Stocks A9 oper ahead of the well-being of its remain vigilant, they expressed called for a narrow emergency bor., Mitch Miller, want the city to .4 Fair through Monday except for Valley Living Al2 citizens. relief at the council action. - _, access road, the City Council reopen Devil's Elbow Road at the : patchy morning low clouds and Weather A6 A judge ruled in April that the They returned to the City Coun- approved a full-width road' that north end of the project.The road, fog, highs in the 70s, lows in the ! World, .., t ,, • T.., ... A11'-, city s condemnation.• proceeding cil last Monday, pleading that required the developers to acquire See ROAD,page A4 i'trzaart t T t 1, 44 f .-..,-rrr..a.raA. k...i.,ufr.6r,az _ _i`-Z,-- - _ C..w-,',- -w..- .... - .. ..._.__.. .-._ ..-. . - Jaye /+4 Sunday, June 11, 1989 Valley Daily EN ii w w 7,,: ti N•+ , .„ ., j• 4•/ a i3• y tICj, t' t a q4— M9 w 4 i+ Mi' S r:,,, A , f, t4. 1:7,,,,,,,,,,..,--. 7. ..:...,,,t1c,,•••• el.-, omtz. , i :„. fr:.3, h. re. ,;_ty-..t.j,,,,,:,..,' y Ikr"*_ A-4T. ,s4;..; ', ` 4444,A104- ,. gt . — rk. : : 14,, .. . t......,-..,: , ir,,i 4 • • it;;-. ••• . .441T, 3. 4Pnilift 41 4. yer` MK ' . "" r, OC"q Vir` g t t { } t 6w' k. j aj Alt'%' ta her b kw: ii . s ` 1' 7• .: f` , nife. i , yy. sK i • y it„. h t1.:- J w a 4 i ; i L x i+W F _ a y f omThetY.•. e1 ra#t... 4 . IE tl• vs, n. l 4 . 1- ' y., r Ty * j 3 site!_ ir ; !^ ,. ,} s. Yf g A tu." 4 t!t - I ,• n I, a4.• yv''t • 7 Vt' 3 1' Lac i' - rA r j omit4.0 Pol i rail al . . c^ AI Ir nj ' L 7 • . ly sc 1, I' P., l _ . . 40...C. 1 v r te' V .'1 Cent. VCrrX r y ft. fl " " ., ..•, r lr~ fi! e ,": i ` s'_ Ai• .. ' fir ' . Of 144. tt''` t it''''''‘ s- '-'": 4-d" •' i .." rGpi f. 2 , p; e lti i lescr q.rc '`,,,,,. Z s,,.. : "` 0.- ,,,..414 '. "fi g f 4 r.}7. 011e v l • , rob Y s S ,a ',r rf ' pnoOgnl tE+ , r yr •, : I+ 4 « 4( z tweaa 1Xascl ` a; a.q t• I t 9 1 r w 3 Y S•C0iH ' ,e ra, e7 t q, a tw, a. v,F cont. Staff photo by DUNCAN LIVINGSTON R a Cathy Corman,with her son Andy,fought condemnation of her Honey Creek property and won—temporarily,at least was app at t Road other solutions, including a new No NoneY Qreek Renton stbeks' east-west arterial in the vicinity of 9:4; Northeast 28th Street, which annc Continued from page Al 46k condemnation would span Honey Creek with a I'm which started out as a mining-era of Corman high bridge. T wagon trail, was closed after a Devil's Elbow \property to extend The plateau east of the creek, in tho 1987 landslide. f o saf closed` 23rd St.to proposed both Rnton and King County, is rob After obtaining an engineering for safety development developing rapidly,and new roads kni' estimate of between$1.2 and$1.5 t• I eventually will be needed, Conn-million to reopen Devil's Elbow Honey Creek Project cilwoman Kathy Keolker Wheeler ord Road, the city began condemna- iu tion procedures against the Cor- NE 20th St. : said.the too mans, aimed at extending North- Her proposal may have been the tap east 23rd Street down the ravine RENTON a Jefferson Ave N city's first discussion of an east- and into the project. v is only access to west arterial across Northeast the NE 16th St.5 mi The developers, Robert Tom- E proposed Renton. Community Develop- phibergandMickSantaofBellevue, development" ment Director Ken Nyberg said agreed to pay the property acqui- the idea would be passed on to the p sition costs. NE 12th St. consultants who are now develop- But King County Superior ing an arterial street plan for the I' Court Judge Lloyd W. Bever 1 city. found the developers' relationship But the multimillion dollar arte 10 with the city too cozy, and denied rial is an unlikely solution to the pl the city's argument that the road He also ordered the city to pay ondary access. :• t t -.4 . ` Honey Creek access problem. w extension was for"public use and.: the Cormans' legal costs, which The council committee, chaired,,, .Tre.June 19 hearing will focus can t,t,i t" ran to more than$4 000.by John Reed, expressed hopes O. ;,,. . • t o rit t accessanecessity.' y . I ry.an B City Attorney. Larry..Warren „'reaching a compromise that wou 0 r, 1 ' , -rgenc i'':acccss 4 Judge Bever said the city was said Bever's ruling still allowed allow"Tomberg :and J.Santa, to•Iron 23rd "'t `e4'`'` serving as the alter'ego of the ab the city to condemn the Cormans' develop their land, while preserv- developer" and "more or less ro rt He advised the Citying the Cormans' property rights. Residents of the Jefferson Ave_ . ,y= dancing to the tune of a different property. planning and develo One possibility would be to nue area will be specifically noti_ al master than the city." ment committee to "clean up the build a one-lane,gated emergency fled of the hearing, Council Pre;i_ pl Because the road wouldn't be language" in its condemnation access route along the 23rd Street dent Dick Stredicke said. d needed without the development, petition to clarify that the city,and extension, instead of a full-width The area south of the project is • Judge Bever said the city's action not the developer, was behind the road.,:The city has enough right- former World War II housing that against-the Cormans was "sub- road. of--way:to ;build a 20.-foot-wide has been converted into duplexes t vetting the purpose of the eminent The committee rebuffed War- read without condemning the Cor Corman's neighborhood west of , d domain statute or condemnation ren's suggestion, and instead ,mans' property. : ?the project consists of new subgl_ : ., statute. reopened the entire issue of sec- Council members brainstormed visions of single-family homes. 4 . an re o•inssee• Sasqi.. Editor's note:"Looking Back"is a only city hall in the state which did inet maker, elected to the posi collection of stories taken from old not close a half day Saturday. at the first council meeting ut issues of newspapers published in LOOKING Renton Chronicle the new administration Tucs o...,....,era s..M.•rn le nine Curt- L.na R_ 19t0- evrnino 40.CITY OF RENTON LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk June 8, 1989 Mr. Mick Santa 4444 Issaquah-Pine Lake Road Issaquah, Washington 98027 RE: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Santa: The Renton City Council has established the date of June 19, 1989 as the public hearing date to consider the question of limiting access on N.E. 23rd Street to emergency access only and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue N.E. for the Honey Creek Associates PPUD-015-84, located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Council President Mayor Public Works Director Don Erickson, Planning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 i 0 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk June 8, 1989 Mr. Bob Tomberg 5611 119th S.E. #2 Bellevue, Washington 98006 RE: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PPUD-015-84 Dear Mr. Tomberg: The Renton City Council has established the date of June 19, 1989 as the public hearing date to consider the question of limiting access on N.E. 23rd Street to emergency access only and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue N.E. for the Honey Creek Associates PPUD-015-84, located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Council President Mayor Public Works Director Don Erickson, Planning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 CITY OF RENTON 11 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk June 8, 1989 TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES RE: HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES PPUD-015-84 Dear Property Owner: The Renton City Council has established the date of June 19, 1989 as the public hearing date to consider the question of limiting access on N.E. 23rd Street to emergency access only and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue N.E. for the Honey Creek Associates PPUD-015-84, located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Council President Mayor Public Works Director 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 Facsimile (206) 2.15-251. Ait i 1ES OF REC D John L. Hendrickson BobTombergLucas, Glase,, Sherman & Hendrickson 5611 119th SE, #2HoneywellCenter, Suite 505 Bellevue, WA98006600- 108th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Roger Green 9818 124th AvenueSEEvaJeanHyleyRenton, WA 98055Fluseland 'Educational Trust Fund 1224 South 211th Street Curtis J. MartinSeattle, WA p A 3728 Park Avenue N . Renton, WA98055MitchMurray 2813 NE 23rd Place GregDienerRenton, WA 98056 Johnson Braund DesignGroup304MainAvenueSouthRobert & William Kobayash Renton, WA 980552707NE125th j Seattle, WA 98125 Mel Easter, Architect Johnson Braund DesignCroupThomasA . Johnson, AIA 304 Main AvenueSouthJohnsonBraundDesignGroupRenton, WA 98055304MainAvenueS . , Suite 200 Renton, WA 98055 Lorraine Damman 2809 NE 23rdPlaceBobLemlyRenton, WA 98056 6005 Hazlewood Drive SE r Bellevue, WA Mr. & Mrs. Wayne Vier 2123 Harrington Pl eNET• B . Malmoe Renton, WA 98056 12105 SE 96th Place Renton, WA 98056 Kathleen Gormley 2820 NE 23rd Plaa Amos Huseland Renton, WA 9805 1916 Edmonds AvenueNE1Renton, WA 98056 su$ ctn erod ek 130RussellBergeron 3, 5 '' QC12807NE21stStreetl .Sf ee Renton, WA 98056 G( 5pS•- r Mick Santa o le7 A. BSet4444Issaquah-Pine Lake Road LaoGc) . 11Issaquah, WA 98027 S r Ke{ S(reer- 1 Chuck Youngquist draK` y() 1 lncl,•ana_ o y 12110 SE 96th Renton, WA 98055 Randy Cormai 2216 llarritgton Pl . NE - 2AMr. Visick Renton, WA 98056 4_,)`c-- 12405 SE 98th Street 017 / - 69 1 '3Renton, WA 98055 Pat Sado 9902 126th Avenue SE n' t,tnr, I.VA (Will; L /CITY OF RENTON i INANCE DEPARTMENT 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 DEC20 "69 CYO11\fr A I 0 Susan Broderick 13032 SE 104th St Renton, WA 98056 iiii„I,iI,ii„uhil,Il.i,ii,izl„I.Iitsimiuthi 0 CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Earl Clymer, Mayor Fire Marshal: Glen G. Gordon Chief: A. Lee Wheeler June 7, 1989 Honorable Earl Clymer City Council Members Renton, Washington 98055 Reference: Iloneycreek P.U.D. Dear Mayor Clymer and Renton City Council Members: I have been contacted by City Attorney Larry Warren regarding the pending hearing andpossibleapprovaloftheI-loneycreek P.U.D. The following information will answer the questions posedinLarryWarren's memorandum pertaining to fire department emergency access from Northeast23rdStreet: 1.Question: Is the existing city right-of-way sufficient to build an emergency access? Answer: I made an inspection of the proposed site on June 7, 1989. It appears the existing right-of-way is sufficient to construct a fire department emergency access into the site. 2.Question: If not, because of retaining walls or other reasons, how much right-of-waywillbenecessary? Answer: During my inspection I did not see any retaining walls, however, one may be required to be constructed in the future, to properly develop the access. 3.Question: What type of surface will be required to handle the emergency vehicles? Answer: The Uniform Fire Code requires a 20 foot minimum width of road surface. CityofRentonFireLaneOrdinance #4130, specifies a paved concrete or asphalt surface to support a 41,000 lb. fire apparatus. The Renton Fire Department will enforce these codes and ordinances. 4.Question: What other problems can you anticipate with this particular emergency access? Answer: At this time I don't anticipate any problems, with the possible exception of grade; maximum approved fire department grade is 12%. I hope I have answered your concerns. Sincerely, GLEN G. GORDON Fire Marshal GGG:mbt pc: Larry Warren Lynn Guttmann 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 9RfSS - (206) ?1S-164'' June 5. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 153 Council President Stredicke indicated that the City has given developers every opportunity to provide development guidelines. He cited examples of large parcels which have been clear-cut and not developed for many years, i.e. Victoria Hills and Sunpointe, and supported the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance as valid and necessary in the city to protect existing vegetation. However, he agreed that the ordinance should be monitored to assure that it is workable. Ordinance #42I9 An ordinance was read amending Title IV (Building Regulations) of City Planning: Land Clearing Code by adding new chapter entitled Land Clearing and Tree Cutting and Tree Cutting Ordinance and establishing penalties. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY Ordinance STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sanford Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, discussed the City's continued) administrative appeal process, citing examples of appeals he has filed with Citizen Comment: Webb - the hearing examiner since 1981 on land use issues. He suggested that the Administrative Appeal City provide procedural charts to any citizen making initial contact with the Process City for any application requiring an administrative determination or interpretation to apprise them of procedures and avenues of appeal. Advancement Requested Kameron Cayce, attorney for Priebes, requested advancement to Correspondence Item 7.a., setting appraisal fees for the vacated property. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE ITEM 7.A. AND REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. (Matter tabled on 5/15/89 to research whether the City has expended funds on the property.) CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Public Works Director Lynn Guttmann Vacation: VAC-88-002,indicating that the City had acquired the right-of-way by subdivision. The Maple Avenue SW, Priebe street now known as Maple Avenue SW lies within the plat of Earlington and was recorded in 1906. Maple Avenue SW (also known as Rainier Boulevard and 90th Avenue S.) was dedicated to the City via the plat. The property was annexed to the City in July, 1948, from King County. The 30 feet proposed for vacation is a grassy bank which the City maintains at a minimal annual cost of $452. City ordinance does not provide for installment payment options, but the petitioner has agreed to the 90 day period allowed by ordinance for payment of the appraised amount after acceptance by Council. Mr. Cayce reiterated previous testimony of 5/15/89, and urged Council to reduce the assessment required of his client or require none at all for the vacated property. Following discussion, it was moved by Keolker-Wheeler, seconded by Nelson, Council set value for all of these properties at $2.50 per square'foot and that the charge be one-half of that or $1.25 per square foot. Motion failed. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL SET THE ASSESSMENT AT 25% OF THE APPRAISED VALUE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, questioned status of the lapel Lapel Microphones microphones authorized for purchase by Council for use in the Council Chambers. Administrative Assistant Parness will check with the Facilities Coor inator. Advancement Requested Randy Corman, 2216 Harrington Place NE, Renton, requested advancement to Correspondence Item 7.b. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE ITEM 7.B. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from Randal and Catherine Corman, 2216 Harrington Place Condemnation: Honey NE, Renton, requesting that Council deny further assistance to Messrs. Santa Creek, NE 23rd Street f,and Tomberg (Honey Creek Associates) in condemning the Corman property y along NE 23rd Street as access to the Honey Creek Planned Unit is Development. The letter reported recent denial of the City's condemnation petition by King County Superior Court, noted that legal costs expended by the City and the Cormans must be reimbursed by the developer, and urged that further public funds not be spent on a project with no significant public value. Planning and Development Committee report regarding this matter was presented: r . June 5. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 154 Plannine and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Development Committee indicating the Committee met on June 1, 1989, to consider the City's Condemnation: Honey continued involvement in the condemnation of NE 23rd and the effects that Creek, NE 23rd Street abandoning the condemnation would have on the Honey Creek PUD. As one of the conditions of development, the Honey Creek PUD was required to acquire and develop one block of NE 23rd to the west of the Honey Creek PUD. The court has refused to allow the condemnation to proceed unless the City asserts more control over the condemnation project. The Committee considered the questions of ingress and egress to the site. 1 Beginning at the north of the project, the Devil's Elbow Road is presently unsafe, and the cost to make that road safe is not known, but it is known that it would be substantial. Additionally, there may be grade problems in getting from the elevation of Devil's Elbow Road to the building areas in the Honey Creek PUD. Proceeding towards the south, any possible ingress and egress along existing rights-of-way before NE 23rd is impossible because of the steep slopes. NE 21st would have the traffic coming out on the same street as would a direct exit to the south, thereby eliminating NE 21st as either a secondary means of access or a means of emergency access. The only potential means of access are NE 23rd and Jefferson Avenue. Jefferson Avenue will serve as a means of access to this property. The remaining question is to what extent NE 23rd should be used as more than emergency access. The original proposal was to have NE 23rd serve as only emergency access. In order to minimize the effects of traffic on the neighborhood around the southern exit, Jefferson Avenue, the Planning and Development Committee previously recommended that NE 23rd be expanded to full two-lane width, and the necessary right-of-way obtained. The Planning and Development Committee believed that a return to using NE 23rd as emergency access only may be warranted. Before that step is taken, however, a full public hearing should be held on the question. Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee recommended to the full Council that a public hearing be held to consider the question of limiting NE 23rd to emergency access only, and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue. The Planning and Development Committee further recommended that the matter of payment of attorney's fees to the respondents in the NE 23rd condemnation be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Upon Council inquiry, City Attorney Warren clarified that the court has ordered the City to pay all legal fees for the condemnation proceedings, which will be reimbursed by the developer in accordance with prior agreement. Mr. Corman felt that Council's efforts may be futile towards the success of a potentially unworkable planned unit development, and he asked that the City not pursue further condemnation of the access property using public funds. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Mills, CL-22-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $71.89 filed by Lela Mills, 108 Pelly Avenue N., Renton, for sewage backup allegedly caused as a result of plugged City sewer line (05/16/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Smith, CL-23-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $40.00 filed by Jerry Smith, 7602 S. Mission Drive, Seattle, for alleged disappearance of personal funds during stay in Renton jail (05/22/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Arcari, CL-24-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $543.35 filed by James Arcari, 29243 161st Place SE, Kent, for replacement of windshield which was allegedly broken by City mower operating on Puget Drive (05/01/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. LID: 329, SW 43rd Street, Finance Department requested ordinance to authorize rollover of $600,000 of Interim Financing LID 329 interim financing (S. 43rd Street). Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Finance: Bidding and Finance Department submitted policy and procedure for bidding and Contracting Policy and contracting requirements. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Procedure 7. 6. 2216 Harrington Place N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 May 31, 1989 The Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Members of the City Council Robert J. Hughes CITY OFRENTONKathyKeolker-Wheeler Nancy Mathews Toni Nelson JUN 1 1989 John Reed RECEIVEDRichardStredicke CITY CLERK'SOFFICEThomasTrimm Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council , We are requesting that you deny further assistance to Messrs. Santa and Tomberg (Honey Creek Associates ) in condemning our property. As you are aware, Honey Creek Associates has for three years repeatedly requested your assistance in procurring a portion of our yard for access to its planned unit development. You have responded to them generously by granting them the use of the city attorney as advisor and as author and executor of a condemnation ordinance against our property; the only stipulation being that Honey Creek Associates reimburse the city for its costs. Because of these actions we were compelled to retain our own attorney, and he subsequently convinced King County Court to deny the condemnation petition because, as the court decision reads, " the City of Renton is serving as the alter ego of Honey Creek Associates. " Denial of this petition was expensive for Messrs. Santa and Tomberg, as they are now obligated to pay their legal fees, the city attorney ' s fees, and our legal fees. We believe that after taking this beating , the developers will now ask you to attempt the same condemnation using taxpayers funds and/or with the city responsible for the proceedings. We feel you should flatly deny any such request for the following two reasons : 1 ) As custodians of taxpayers ' money, you should not spend public funds on a project with no significant public value. Any new condemnation ordinance can be defeated as easily as the last one, based on the three-year record of agreements between the developers and Honorable Mayor and Ci' "ouncil Page 2 May 31, 1989 the city and the lack of a previous city plan to use the subject properties. A new ordinance would only reinforce the conclusion that "Renton is serving as the alter ego of Honey Creek Associates. " Losing would cost the taxpayers plenty. This time the city would foot the bill for our legal fees, city attorney' s fees, and related costs. Since we are prepared to fight any appeals , the costs would likely be tens of thousands of dollars. And winning could be equally expensive. The city would still pay city attorney' s fees and witness fees through many phases of trial . In addition, taxpayers would be required to purchase the 8400 square feet of wooded view property plus improvements at fair market value (not at the approximatly 2/3 assesed value the city attorney has mentioned in past correspondence) . The cost would be higher still since the taking of this land would reduce our home 's setback to less than the legal minimum. And taxpayers would underwrite all of the above costs so that an out-of-town developer can maximize his profits. We doubt taxpayers would like to do this , and we feel taxpayers ' input should be solicited before choosing this course. You may additionally be asked to take the reins for the condemnation, accepting responsibility to choose between proceeding or abandoning during the process. For example, it may be proposed that you complete condemnation, perhaps even build the road, and then charge the developer a usage fee. We urge that you be wary of this type of arrangement, since you will not be able to predict the developers ' plans or intentions. If you coordinate with the developers, we will soundly defeat the ordinance in court, asserting that the developer still has control of the proceedings. But if you do not coordinate with the developer the taxpayers could wind up purchasing aroadwaythatthedeveloperrefusestobuyorimprove. (The developers could decide you paid too much, or they could sell their land to someone who wants to use it a different way) . Taxpayers would not be impressed by either outcome. 2) As advocates of Renton citizens, you should not put the desires of out-of-town developers over the needs of your own citizens. As we have explained in previous correspondence, the proposed road is inconsistent with our intended use of our property. As your constituents, we feel you should assist us rather than Honey Creek Associates who live elsewhere and whose property was not even part of Renton until they pushed their annexation through last year. Honorable Mayor and City C Page 3 May 31, 1989 In conclusion, we request that you deny further legal assistance to the developers and allow their three-year-old PPUD to die for lack of their meeting requirements. You have far exceeded any obligation you may have toward them. Any additional assistance you provide will further derail our good faith negotiation attempts and dissipate funds that could be applied towards a realistic purchase offer for our property or improving other access roads into the Honey Creek parcel. Sincerely, Randal A. Corman Catherine L. Corman A PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE : N.E. 23rd and Honey Creek PUD The Planning and Development Committee met on June 1 , 1989 , to consider the city' s continued involvement in the condemnation of N.E . 23rd and the effects that abandoning the condemnation would have on the Honey Creek PUD.As one of the conditions of development, the Honey Creek PUD was required to acquire and develop one block of N.E . 23rd to the west of the Honey Creek PUD. The court has refused to allow the condemnation to proceed unless the city asserts more control over the condemnation project . The committee considered the questions of ingress and egress to the site. Beginning at the north of the project, the Devil ' s Elbow Road is presently unsafe, and the cost to make that road safe is not known, but it is known that it would be substantial . Additionally, there may be grade problems in getting from the elevation of Devil ' s Elbow Road to the building areas in the Honey Creek PUD. Proceeding towards the south, any possible ingress and egress along existing rights-of-way before N.E . 23rd is impossible because of the steep slopes . N.E . 21st would have the traffic coming out on the same street as would a direct exit to the south, thereby eliminating N.E . 21st as either a secondary means of access or a means of emergency access . The only potential means of access are N.E . 23rd and Jefferson Avenue. Jefferson Avenue will serve as a means of access to this property. The remaining question is to what extent N.E . 23rd should be used as more than emergency access . The original proposal was to have N.E . 23rd serve as only emergency access .In order to minimize the effects of traffic on the neighborhood around the southern exit, Jefferson Avenue, the Planning and Development Committee previously recommended that N.E . 23rd be expanded to full two-lane width, and the necessary right-of- way obtained. The Planning and Development Committee believes that a return to using N.E . 23rd as emergency access only, may be warranted. Before that step is taken, however, a full public hearing should be held on the question. Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee recommends to the full council that a public hearing be held to consider the question of limiting N.E . 23rd to emergency access i Planning and Dew ment Committee Report Page -2- only, and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue. The Planning and Development Committee further recommends that the matter of payment of attorney' s fees to the respondents in the N.E . 23rd condemnation be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review. DATED: June 5 , 1989 . Gv •• hn Reed, Chairman Nancy• Ma news 7a-t-4;1 Kathy eolker-Wheeler LJW: as . CITY7 : 26 . frt.1/4 NV June 5. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 153 Council President Stredicke indicated that the City has given developers every opportunity to provide development guidelines. He cited examples of large parcels which have been clear-cut and not developed for many years, i.e. Victoria Hills and Sunpointe, and supported the Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance as valid and necessary in the city to protect existing vegetation. However, he agreed that the ordinance should be monitored to assure that it is workable. Ordinance #4219 An ordinance was read amending Title IV (Building Regulations) ofCityPlanning: Land Clearing Code by adding new chapter entitled Land Clearing and TreeCuttingandTreeCuttingOrdinanceandestablishingpenalties. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY Ordinance STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sanford Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, Renton, discussed the City'scontinued) administrative appeal process, citing examples of appeals he has filedwithCitizenComment: Webb - the hearing examiner since 1981 on land use issues. He suggested that the Administrative Appeal City provide procedural charts to any citizen making initial contact withtheProcessCityforanyapplicationrequiringanadministrativedeterminationor interpretation to apprise them of procedures and avenues of appeal. Advancement Requested Kameron Cayce, attorney for Priebes, requested advancement to Correspondence Item 7.a., setting appraisal fees for the vacated property. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE ITEM 7.A. AND REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. (Matter tabled on 5/15/89 to research whether the City has expended funds on the property.) CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Public Works Director Lynn Guttmann Vacation: VAC-88-002,indicating that the City had acquired the right-of-way by subdivision. The Maple Avenue SW, Priebe street now known as Maple Avenue SW lies within the plat of Earlington and was recorded in 1906. Maple Avenue SW (also known as Rainier Boulevard and 90th Avenue S.) was dedicated to the City via the plat. The property was annexed to the City in July, 1948, from King County. The 30 feet proposed for vacation is a grassy bank which the City maintains at a minimal annual cost of $452. City ordinance does not provide for installment payment options, but the petitioner has agreed to the 90 day period allowed by ordinance for payment of the appraised amount after acceptance by Council. Mr. Cayce reiterated previous testimony of 5/15/89, and urged Council to reduce the assessment required of his client or require none at all for the vacated property. Following discussion, it was moved by Keolker-Wheeler, seconded by Nelson, Council set value for all of these properties at $2.50 per square'foot and that the charge be one-half of that or $1.25 per square foot. Motion failed. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL SET THE ASSESSMENT AT 25% OF THE APPRAISED VALUE. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, questioned status of the lapel Lapel Microphones microphones authorized for purchase by Council for use in the Council Chambers. Administrative Assistant Parness will check with the Facilities Coordinator. Advancement Requested Randy Corman, 2216 Harrington Place NE, Renton, requested advancement to Correspondence Item 7.b. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE ITEM 7.B. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from Randal and Catherine Corman, 2216 Harrington Place Condemnation: Honey NE, Renton, requesting that Council deny further assistance to Messrs. Santa Creek, NE 23rd Street and Tomberg (Honey Creek Associates) in condemning the Corman property along NE 23rd Street as access to the Honey Creek Planned Unit Development. The letter reported recent denial of the City's condemnation petition by King County Superior Court, noted that legal costs expended by the City and the Cormans must be reimbursed by the developer, and urged that further public funds not be spent on a project with no significant public value. Planning and Development Committee report regarding this matter was presented: 1 June 5. 1989 Renton City Council Minutes Page 154 Plannlnz and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Pevelopment Committee indicating the Committee met on June 1, 1989, to consider the City'sCondemnation: Honey continued involvement in the condemnation of NE 23rd and the effects that Creek, NE 23rd Street abandoning the condemnation would have on the Honey Creek PUD. As one of the conditions of development, the Honey Creek PUD was required to acquire and develop one block of NE 23rd to the west of the Honey Creek PUD. The court has refused to allow the condemnation to proceed unless the City asserts more control over the condemnation project. The Committee considered the questions of ingress and egress to the site. Beginning at the north of the project, the Devil's Elbow Road is presently unsafe, and the cost to make that road safe is not known, but it is known that it would be substantial. Additionally, there may be grade problems in getting from the elevation of Devil's Elbow Road to the building areas in the Honey Creek PUD. Proceeding towards the south, any possible ingress and egress along existing rights-of-way before NE 23rd is impossible because of the steep slopes. NE 21st would have the traffic coming out on the same street as would a direct exit to the south, thereby eliminating NE 21st as either a secondary means of access or a means of emergency access. The only potential means of access are NE 23rd and Jefferson Avenue. Jefferson Avenue will serve as a means of access to this property. The remaining question is to what extent NE 23rd should be used as more than emergency access. The original proposal was to have NE 23rd serve as only emergency access. In order to minimize the effects of traffic on the neighborhood around the southern exit, Jefferson Avenue, the Planning and Development Committee previously recommended that NE 23rd be expanded to full two-lane width, and the necessary right-of-way obtained. The Planning and Development Committee believed that a return to usingNE23rdasemergencyaccessonlymaybewarranted. Before that step is taken, however, a full public hearing should be held on the question. Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee recommended to the full Council that a public hearing be held to consider the question of limiting NE 23rd to emergency access only, and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue. The Planning and Development Committee further recommended that the matter of payment of attorney's fees to the respondents in the NE 23rd condemnation be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Upon Council inquiry, City Attorney Warren clarified that the court has ordered the City to pay all legal fees for the condemnation proceedings, which will be reimbursed by the developer in accordance with prior agreement. Mr. Corman felt that Council's efforts may be futile towards the success of a potentially unworkable planned unit development, and he asked that the City not pursue further condemnation of the access property using public funds. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Mills, CL-22-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $71.89 filed by Lela Mills, 108PellyAvenueN., Renton, for sewage backup allegedly caused as a result of plugged City sewer line (05/16/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Smith, CL-23-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $40.00 filed by Jerry Smith, 7602 S. Mission Drive, Seattle, for alleged disappearance of personal funds during stay in Renton jail (05/22/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Arcari, CL-24-89 Claim for damages in the amount of $543.35 filed by James Arcari, 29243 161st Place SE, Kent, for replacement of windshield which wasallegedlybrokenbyCitymoweroperatingonPugetDrive (05/01/89). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. LID: 329, SW 43rd Street, Finance Department requested ordinance to authorize rollover of $600,000ofInterimFinancingLID329interimfinancing (S. 43rd Street). Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Finance: Bidding and Finance Department submitted policy and procedure for biddingandContractingPolicyandcontractingrequirements. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.Procedure 411110 4 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: N.E. 23rd and Honey Creek PUD The Planning and Development Committee met on June 1 , 1989 , to consider the city' s continued involvement in the condemnation of N.E . 23rd and the effects that abandoning the condemnation would have on the Honey Creek PUD.As one of the conditions of development, the Honey Creek PUD was required to acquire and develop one block of N.E . 23rd to the west of the Honey Creek PUD. The court has refused to allow the condemnation to proceed unless the city asserts more control over the condemnation project . The committee considered the questions of ingress and egress to the site. Beginning at the north of the project, the Devil ' s Elbow Road is presently unsafe, and the cost to make that road safe is not known, but it is known that it would be substantial . Additionally, there may be grade problems in getting from the elevation of Devil ' s Elbow Road to the building areas in the Honey Creek PUD. Proceeding towards the south, any possible ingress and egress along existing rights-of-way before N.E . 23rd is impossible because of the steep slopes . N.E . 21st would have the traffic coming out on the same street as would a direct exit to the south, thereby eliminating N.E . 21st as either a secondary means of access or a means of emergency access . The only potential means of access are N.E. 23rd and Jefferson Avenue. Jefferson Avenue will serve as a means of access to this property. The remaining question is to what extent N.E . 23rd should be used as more than emergency access . The original proposal was to have N.E . 23rd serve as only emergency access .In order to minimize the effects of traffic on the neighborhood around the southern exit, Jefferson Avenue, the Planning and Development Committee previously recommended that N.E . 23rd be expanded to full two-lane width, and the necessary right-of- way obtained. The Planning and Development Committee believes that a return to using N.E . 23rd as emergency access only, may be warranted. Before that step is taken, however, a full public hearing should be held on the question. Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee recommends to the full council that a public hearing be held to consider the question of limiting N.E . 23rd to emergency access 2: ; tf 1 Planning and Develo ment Committee Report Page -2- only, and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue. The Planning and Development Committee further recommends that the matter of payment of attorney' s fees to the respondents in the N.E. 23rd condemnation be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review. DATED: June 5 , 1989 . hn Reed, Chairman Nancy Ma yews Kathy eolker-Wheeler LJW:as . CITY7 : 26 . PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: N.E. 23rd and Honey Creek PUD The Planning and Development Committee met on June 1 , 1989 , to consider the city' s continued involvement in the condemnation of N.E. 23rd and the effects that abandoning the condemnation would have on the Honey Creek PUD.As one of the conditions of development, the Honey Creek PUD was required to acquire and develop one block of N.E. 23rd to the west of the Honey Creek PUD. The court has refused to allow the condemnation to proceed unless the city asserts more control over the condemnation project. The committee considered the questions of ingress and egress to the site. Beginning at the north of the project, the Devil ' s Elbow Road is presently unsafe, and the cost to make that road safe is not known, but it is known that it would be substantial . Additionally, there may be grade problems in getting from the elevation of Devil ' s Elbow Road to the building areas in the Honey Creek PUD. Proceeding towards the south, any possible ingress and egress along existing rights-of-way before N.E . 23rd is impossible because of the steep slopes . N.E. 21st would have the traffic coming out on the same street as would a direct exit to the south, thereby eliminating N.E . 21st as either a secondary means of access or a means of emergency access . The only potential means of access are N.E. 23rd and Jefferson Avenue. Jefferson Avenue will serve as a means of access to this property. The remaining question is to what extent N.E. 23rd should be used as more than emergency access . The original proposal was to have N.E . 23rd serve as only emergency access .In order to minimize the effects of traffic on the neighborhood around the southern exit, Jefferson Avenue, the Planning and Development Committee previously recommended that N.E. 23rd be expanded to full two-lane width, and the necessary right-of- way obtained. The Planning and Development Committee believes that a return to using N.E. 23rd as emergency access only, may be warranted. Before that step is taken, however, a full public hearing should be held on the question. Therefore, the Planning and Development Committee recommends to the full council that a public hearing be held to consider the question of limiting N.E. 23rd to emergency access CC: VW:AA alp- J !y 1r t 1, 1 7y tf. t Planning and Development Committee Report Page -2- only, and having normal ingress and egress limited to Jefferson Avenue. The Planning and Development Committee further recommends that the matter of payment of attorney's fees to the respondents in the N.E . 23rd condemnation be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review. DATED: June 5 , 1989 . 2//CY, hn Reed, Chairman Nancy Ma news e A , WokLibek Kathy eolker-Wheeler LJW:as . CITY7 : 26 . i r. 1 p4 . '; --Fx• ,C_ .- a• 1 :rs ca • r 3 e '+,.>3sh`(t f{, 'f a frra .fit,. I.' i. •°' ; .m+.r • A' . 4.* 4, ' t : ;,, re-q '. Tit r?3j•,.. ° s mf. y.'w, r 1 o'. y. a.:,, e ar t.• i j :f • , y+ ' r , ;' i1 --r— -a, y, - kt•a . a b y 1:M,.. 1, yrryt R y ? eiry x; qR;-v{-'3 s- ,'s . t'a3Y,: r srttt. ',V.' S `e, • "• -' 't s / Vxa0.ti`fexe. :t 1 0. r ri• ti t x r wL T ti- •' f .; rfi.,PY•' t rS _ p , x-*-C 'ryC s} ir' r .- y . c t-. 463 • tom c4t :. 'ram, iHONEY CREEK PPUD ACCESS r Chronology Planning and Development Committee June 30, 1988 4v.,.A Z March 4, 1985 Original PPUD submittal proposed primary access on Jefferson Avenue NE,secondary access on NE 21st Street, and a 20-foot ,, °'u wide, gated emergency access at NE 23rd Street. tt,i r Hearing Examiner denied the PPUD based on inaccurate density calculations. January 1, 1986 PPUD resubmitted proposing primary access on Jefferson 4 venue NE,secondary access on NE 21st Street, and a 20-foot r wide,gated emergency access at NE 23rd Street. ikAt Hearing Examiner recommended the elimination of the entry et_ Y'f at 21st Street,and required the applicant to bear the cost oC y', 1 upgrading the access roads. r tx April 14, 1986 Planning and Development Committee indicated concerns e s e regarding access to the proposed PPUD. The Committee stated 1' ' that,'...full street improvements on a 40-foot public right-of- t x,mar,. way alignment with NE 23rd Street are necessary to provide Y r• necessary access to the development.' 1-,„, The Council required the'...dedication of a full 40-foot wide X • • right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street between Harrington , -r_Rhs_•r. Avenue NE and the site,with an engineering report and specifications for full street improvement as required by City Y: Code.' May 12, 1986 At the public hearing on the 75% annexation petition, Council Y confirmed the elimination of the entry at NE 21st Street and i: the requirement of a 40-foot wide right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street. If the additional 20 feet of right-of-way on :`+,'•; 7 the south side of NE 23rd Street cannot be acquired, the r Council reaffirmed that the development will not be allowed s, to proceed. r,+ Hone Creek Associates requested Council assistanceinSeptemxr8, 1986 YItmeetingtheNE23rdStreetright-of-way condition. CityAttorneyLarryWarrenreportedthat, although the matter had i?,. been discussed in Council Committee, the requirement for full-width right-of-way had been approved by Council without clarification of whether the City would aid in the j: i; condemnation procedures, if necessary. Council referred the matter to the City Attorney for preliminary assistance in the condemnation proceedings. Y 1 S i 4 r - - , _ ., v.:-.itv 4i.•i•',,1.4,4•,,,:r%-,.,. :'' • - -- ., -,' ' \ . - „.---...,.. Iii#2.1ti .';'4'*I'rg::,.- t.--,,rw'sz,,,ili.,...,..rs,:',,•-. 1••- •';70:-.1.",,,,f,A',,,e.mk. 9-.'„,- .4c:ttl.v,*„,,,. r..1„-:,::,-,......,,,,,*.t,,k,....- ,r„,rt,-g ,-.6,":^1.-::,*,""ftt..'(',7'`.:•` z-vr-- 1...• - t - ,4 ,kt4 c -, -4,4,-,.-.. , ,.: .,-... .i . . 4;..4, 4. olk: .! T... 44,44.- ,,‘,si;44.: t'n,.-111, t r•-'7&,,fickslYto,tifri, -zw., -:,,,'„ - —.. , • ,-: i, 47,- •to ...1.,,•,. .....--,,, ,-- t, 1,1 ''t'Vr.'13,' ' ' ' .?.. .: t4 t , ''.=-11$4-4.- ll'At.,-.+..r.: ','..- - '-. - "--.•., . 1 1.,.'..:4,Y ' '4' A‘..1- ... 1/4-. N. -•' ItY.Y'R-1.,16.^. ' t'''''.".."la.l'tv. %V. k - ., '""*• 161:5,..6.-,. ."?I'4. 44.:).'4*.'$ ,t.. • ' -1 I.A."..0 .•%`‘ '--:-' 1:.'.---‘ r-.'""',- iv: w- fi-' 1 • m'-' - ' .i • e.4:, ,• ,.);;''..-,.t- ,w4:3..-,,-,: :•• ..,‘, . . -. , e E: Al ,, ..,-,,-,; ,.,, 7„ -..-s, ... A..r.- ,,- t,,,, -4 3 ,, ,- ,. ., .-. -1,;.. ,- -• •-••• ',- .....‘ - ',.- -• 1 711;"'cv,',...4,X4.•.-kf-A` r.- 1T-7,'ei13.:,•_-:;, ','.;;V:-,--;1.-,-5--ki.w-, A'it'.;-;c:-;7.-eic-41-t.'•#--:0-4540, .:5::') s- r.; .4'-'44:1-*4*-V.,:-K•,,'", .„ 7- 1-....,.,'="•,':' 1 '''' -..• . 7. thS, t. . .c.'-kt..t•-=',N li • c.- ;c2, C-7' .;'0.,"..` • .. ;:.•-.Nit r--4% '''" '-"." A.-,r-..il •,.z. Z4t.,e,,4-. -,1; NT...4,-,!,-4-7f-i-...,- 0. October 19, 1987 Y` Honey Creek Associates representative Bob Tomberg :. , •, voluntarily agreed to follow the revised PUD timelines, 14 • predicated on the condemnation of NE 23rd Street. ty... Attorney Larry Warren advised Council that the condemnation proceedings would be at the developer's expense. March 7, 1988 Transportation Committee concurred in the Public Works L Department's recommendation to require a 28-footstreetsectionface-of-curb to face-of-curb with a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side on NE 23rd Street. A minimum 20-foot 3--..1 • right-of-way will be required on the south plusadditionalfootageforslopeeasements, if deemed necessary. Council concurred in the Committee's recommendation. 1 I•i. April 4. 1983 t'o) City Attorney Larry Warren requested anthorization to prepare NO 0 an ordinance authorizing the condemnation of NE 23rd Street z.1. right-of-way. The matter was referred to the Ways and 4... Means Committee. A. 4-':":April 18, 1988 The condemnation ordinance was read before the CityCouncilandreferredbacktoWaysandMeansuntiltheCityAttorneycannegotiateacontractwithHoneyCreekAssociates pe 2 1 addressing the developer's responsibility for the condemnation • .., t'Z. costs. June 20, 1988 Honey Creek Associates representative Bob TombergrequestedachangeintheHoneyCreekPPUDtoprovideemergencyaccessalongNE23rdStreetinsteadoffullaccessduetoa pending lawsuit by a resident opposing the acquisition of the . ',-....?-..,.t..!,.. , roadway property. Council referred the matter to the planning and Development Committee. 4 r t A . t I;; ctdsk3ahcpd S . A . f . f.es. 1%.'..s. 0 3W: ullii dl••P••A•AT-a...0.•INV.,.J., 1.a., 4 j1tt/ t . . 74; 1,11: 511 ALA/ pkotw CI PI! 1 FEY-q.,Avg[i 2 MAY 12 1989 3 WARRED) &KclLv" By 4 5 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 8 In the matter of the Petition of 9 the City of Renton a municipal NO. 88-2-21051 -9 corporation of the State of 10 Washington to acquire by condemnation ) certain property and property rights ORDER DENYING 11 for the purpose of acquisition of the ) DETERMINATION OF right-of-way for street and associated ) PUBLIC USE AND 12 improvements for N . E. 23rd Street in NECESSITY Renton , Washington is contemplated by ) 13 City of Renton Ordinance No . 4182 . 14 15 I . HEARING 16 1 . 1 Date. April 12, 1989 17 1 . 2 Appearances. Petitioner City of Renton appeared by it - 18 attorney , Lawrence J. Warren of Warren , Kellogg , Barber , Dean 19 Fontes , P. S . Respondents Randal A. and Catherine L. Corma 20 appeared in person and by their attorney , Michael M . Hanis of 21 Hanis & Olson . 22 1 . 3 Motion. The hearing was on the City ' s Motion to 23 Determine Public Use and Necessity. 24 1 . 4 Evidence. The matter was presented on an evidentiar 25 record of twenty-four documents stipulated by the parties to b, 26 HAN IS & OLSON ORDER DENYING DETERMINATION OF 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 PUBLIC USE AND NECESSITY - 1 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 206) 251-9313 4 the record upon which the matter should be decided . 1 1 . 5 Argument and Briefs. Each party submitted Briefs in 2 support of their respective positions before the Court . The 3 court also heard oral argument from the attorneys of record . 4 II . DECISION 5 This Court , having considered the record submitted and 6 stipulated to by the parties , having read the Briefs , and having 7 heard argument of Counsel , now finds as follows : 8 2. 1 The Court finds that while the City ' s action in 9 bringing this condemnation is not a truly constructive fraud , the 10 City of Renton is serving as the alter ego of Honey Creek 11 Associates , a private developer , in the context of the present 12 contract and ordinance authorization . 13 2. 2 In the context of the record here , the developer i - 14 making the determination of whether to go through with th. 15 condemnation , acquisition or development of the street i 16 question ; even from the standpoint of the public use , or from th= 17 standpoint of necessity or whether it ' s required in the publi . 18 interest . 19 2. 3 The governmental agency must be in absolute control o 20 the activity of condemnation from the standpoint of decision 21 making . It is not a delegable authority , and on the record her: 22 it has the appearance of being delegated . 23 2. 4 The relationship of the City and the developer i - 24 subverting the purpose of the eminent domain statute . 25 26 HANIS & OLSON ORDER DENYING DETERMINATION OF. 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 PUBLIC USE AND NECESSITY - 2 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 206)251-9313 2. 5 Respondents are entitled to an award of costs including 1 reasonable attorney fees pursuant to RCW 8. 25. 075. 2 III . ORDER 3 On the basis of the foregoing , the Court hereby Orders as 4 follows : 5 3. 1 The Motion for a finding of Public Use and Necessity is 6 denied . 7 3. 2 There being no establishment of public use and 8 necessity , this matter shall be , and hereby is dismissed without 9 prejudice to any future petition of the City. 10 3. 3 Respondents are awarded attorney fees in the amount of 11 $ . 12 DONE in open Court this day of May , 1989. 13 14 Judge Lloyd W. Bever 15 Presented by: 16 HANIS & OLSON 17 18 Michael M . Hanis , 19 Attorney for Respondents 20 Approved for entry: 21 WARREN, KELLOGG, BARBER, DEAN & FONTES, P.S. 22 23 Lawrence J . Warren Attorney for Petitioner 24 25 26 HANIS & OLSON ORDER DENYING DETERMINATION OF 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 PUBLIC USE AND NECESSITY - 3 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 206)251-9313 ri cc, rfr ‘ly 2 L1 MAY 12 1989 3 W/kikkOq& 4 Ely 5 6 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 7 8 In the matter of the Petition of the City of Renton a municipal NO. 88-2-21051-99corporationoftheStateof Washington to acquire by condemnation ) 10 certain property and property rights BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF for the purpose of acquisition of the ) REQUEST FORATTORNEY11right-of-way for street and associated ) FEES improvements for N.E. 23rd Street in 12 Renton, Washington is contemplated by ) City of Renton Ordinance No. 4182 . 13 14 RCW 8 . 25.075 provides in part as follows: 15 16 1) A superior court having jurisdiction of a proceeding instituted by a condemnor to acquire real property shall award the condemnee costsincluding17 reasonable attorney fees and expert witness fees if : 18 a) There is a final adjudication that the condemnor cannot acquire the real property by condemnation. 19 4) Reasonable attorney fees and expert witness fees 20 as authorized in this section shall be subject to the provisions of subsection (4) of RCW 8. 25. 070 as now or 21 hereafter amended . 22 RCW 8 . 25. 070 (4) provides Reasonable attorney fees as authorized in thissection23 shall not exceed the general trial rate per day 24 customarily charged for general trial work by the condemnee ' s attorney for actual trial time and his or 25 her hourly rate for preparation. 26 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY FEES - 1 HANIS & OLSON 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 206) 251-9313 1 2 The statute mandates an award of fees under the circumstances 3 of of the instant case, and provides the Court with the formula 4 for calculating the amount. 5 The statute was most recently amended in 1984 . In 6 sustaining an award of approximately $75,000 fees and costs , 7 Division III of the Court of Appeals noted that the trial court 8 there acknowledged 9 the intent of the Legislature [in amending the statute] was to disallow contingent fees in condemnation cases 10 and concluded an award based on hourly rates was appropriate. 11 Wilson v. Key Tronic Corp. , 40 Wn. App. 802, 817; 701 P. 2d 518 12 1985) . The affidavit of attorney fees submitted herewith is 13 based on an hourly rate as described by the statute. 14 In In Re Seattle, 79 Wn. 2d 490 ; 487 P. 2d 777 (1971) , the 15 Court discussed its rationale for affirming an award of almost 16 444 ,000 fees and costs in a taking ultimately abandoned by 17 Seattle . After first noting that the fees were large, the 18 Court stated in response to an argument by the City that the 19 burden of such fee award would fall on the taxpayers. 20 It is true that the taxpayer must pay the fee. It is, 21 however, this same taxpayer who placed the respondent ' s property in jeopardy and made it necessary for them to 22 defend its value. 23 In Re Seattle, 493 . In the instant case, of course, the burden 24 will not necessarily be on the taxpayers , but upon the 25 developer by virtue of its contract with the City. Relative to 26 HANIS & OLSON 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY.SUITE 203 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 206)251- 9313BRIEFINSUPPORTOFREQUEST 1 the entire cost of the project - and the profits to be realized 2 - the amount sought here is minor . The contract itself 3 evidences an acknowledgement and acceptance of the obligation 4 of paying fees to the Cormans even if the condemnation is not 5 completed. Therefore, there is no surprise or hardship. There 6 is no reason to award the Cormans other than a full and fair 7 recovery of the fees they were required to incur to defend 8 their property. 9 The amount involved here, while not particularly large to 10 developers and cities, is very significant to a young family 11 trying to make ends meet in their first home. Contrary to the 12 ordinary instance of litigation, the Cormans did nothing here 13 to become involved in this law suit. They just happened to be 14 in the developer ' s way. 15 The issues here were complex . Case law shows how 16 difficult the burden is on a condemnee to overcome the 17 presumption in favor of cities seeking private property. Even 18 so, this is the stage of the proceedings the Cormans chose to 19 make their stand, and having done so successfully, they should 20 be made whole . In the long run , all of the parties were 21 without doubt saved the amount sought herein several times 22 over . The fees are reasonable for the services provided, the 23 complexity of the issues, and in light of the constitutional 24 interests that were protected. 25 26 HAN IS & OLSON 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST 206) 251-9313 FOR ATTORNEY FEES - 3 1 The Court is requested to award the fees and costs sought 2 herein. 3 Respectfully submitted, 4 N 5 HANIS & OLSON 6 Michael M. H nis 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 HAN IS & OLSON 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 206) 25I.9313 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST 4• 0- 1 cj‘EP:ROUE- - 3 4 MAY 12 1989 Vi'Hhictiv 5 By 6 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KINGCOUNTY7 8 In the matter of the Petition of 9 the City of Renton a municipal NO. 88-2-21051-9 corporation of the State of 10 Washington to acquire by condemnation ) certain property and property rights AFFIDAVITOF11forthepurposeofacquisitionofthe ) ATTORNEY FEES right-of-way for street and associated ) 12 improvements for N.E. 23rd Street in Renton, Washington is contemplated by )13 City of Renton Ordinance No. 4182 . 14 15 Michael M . Hanis , being first duly sworn, uponoath16 deposes and says : 17 18 I am attorney for Randal and Catherine Corman. I make 19 this affidavit in support of the Cormans ' request for an award 20 of fees and costs. 21 Attached hereto is a listing of all services provided 22 herein, and the time expended. Each item is supported by a time record made contemporaneously with the services provided.23 24 All time is billed at $120 . 00 per hour which is my normal 25 billing rate. Each service provided herein was necessary to 26 AFFIDAVIT OF ATTORNEY FEES - 1 HAN IS & OLSON 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 206) 251-9313 1 the protection and advocacy of my clients ' legal and 2 constitutional rights . 3 While I have not charged an amount above my normal billing 4 rate for this matter , my experience and background in 5 condemnation law would justify a higher rate commensurate with 6 the complex nature of this particular area of practice . As an 7 attorney for municipalities, I have been involved in well over 8 200 eminent domain acquisitions over the past ten years . I 9 have represented condemnors and condemnees at the negotiation, 10 trial , and appellate levels. 11 I will present testimony, as necessary, by attorneys who 12 do substantial condemnation work which will verify the 13 reasonableness of the amount sought herein. 14 Further affiant sayeth naught. 15 16 17 Michael anis 18 SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this 9th day of May, 19 1989 . 20 21L NOTARY PUBLIC in nd for the State 22 of Washington, residing at Renton. 23 24 25 26 HANIS & OLSON 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 AFPIDAVIT OF ATTO 206) 251-9313 RNEY FEES - 2 Statement- HANIS & OLSON Attorneys at Law 3900 East Valley Hwy. , Suite 203 Renton , WA 98055 206) 251 -9313 RANDY CORMAN 2216 HARRINGTON PL. N . E. RENTON , WA 98056 INVOICE PERIOD ENDED: 5/08/89 INVOICE DATE: May 9 , 1989 Amount due this invoice: 6 ,441 . 69 ACCOUNT NO. : M111 MATTER : CITY OF RENTON Rate $120. 00 /hr . DATE DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE AMOUNT COSTS - 22 COPIES @ . 15 = $3 . 30 MH 3 . 30 COSTS ADVANCED - CHECK #5090 TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL DECISION 42 42. 00 COSTS ADVANCED - CHECK #5031 COPY COSTS 4. 80 4 . 80 10/ 18/88 RE: ORDINANCE AND AGREEMENT WITH DEVELOPER; CONDEMNATION 0. 4 Hrs . MH 36 . 00 10/ 19/88 PHONE CONF ' S W/ CLIENT RE: ORDINANCE; NOTES TO FILE , ETC . 0. 4 Hrs . MH 36. 00 11 / 17/88 CONF W/CLIENTS FOR ATTY HANIS 0. 5 Hrs . GO 45 . 00 May 9 , 1989 RANDY CORMAN 11 / 1.i/8E REVIEW SUMMON PETITION ; PRELIM PREP OF RESPONSE 0. 8 Hrs . MH 72 . 00 11 / 18/88 WORK ON CONDEMNATION PETITION ; REVIEW ALL COUNCIL MINUTES RE: DISCUSSIONS & EXEC SESSIONS ; RESEARCH; CORRESPONDENCE 2 . 3 Hrs . MH 207 . 00 11 /20/88 SET UP FILE; DRAFT NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ANSWER 1 . 8 Hrs . MH 162 . 00 11 /21 /88 RE: EXTRA 10 FEET; CITY PURPOSE; CONTRACT W/DEVELOPER 0 . 7 Hrs . MH 63 . 00 11 /30/88 REVIEW & FINAL DRAFT OF ANSWER ; ARRANGE SERVICE & FILING 0 . 6 Hrs . MH 54 . 00 12/ 19/88 RE: COUNCIL MINUTES ; USE & NECESSITY HEARING ; RESEARCH INTERIM APPEAL 0. 7 Hrs . MH 84 . 00 12/21 /88 OFFICE CALL W/ CLIENT & M. MURRAY RE: SCHEDULING ; PREPARATION, ETC . ; REVIEW WESTLAKE MALL CASE 0. 9 Hrs . MH 108. 00 1 / 19/89 RESEARCH AT LAW LIBRARY RE: PUBLIC USE; ETC . 1 . 2 Hrs. MH 144 . 00 2/ 13/89 PH CONF W/ CLIENT; LETTER OF SETTLEMENT TO CITY ; PREP FOR TRIAL; DOCUMENT SUBPOENA LIST 2. 3 Hrs . MH 276 . 00 2/ 14/89 TRIAL PREPARATION 1 . 8 Hrs . MH 216 . 00 2/ 15/89 SETTLEMENT PROPOSAL; PH CALLS ; PREP FOR HEARING 0. 6 Hrs . MH 72. 00 2/ 16/89 PREP FOR TRIAL; EXHIBITS , SUBPOENA ; PREPARE RECORD AND TRIAL NOTEBOOK 4. 5 Hrs . MH 540 . 00 2/ 17/89 PREP FOR TRIAL; PH CONF W/ LARRY WARREN ; PH CALLS TO CLIENT; RESEARCH AND DRAFTING BRIEF 3. 1 Hrs . MH 372. 00 May 9 , 1989 RANDY CORMAN 2/21 /89 COURT HEARINC TO SET PUBLIC USE TRIAL DATE NO CHARGE FOR 1 HOUR PER MIKE 2 Hrs . MH 120 . 00 2/21 /89 RESEARCH AT KING COUNTY LAW LIBRARY ; WASH . LAW REVIEW; STATES W/ SIMILAR CONSTITUTIONS 1 . 6 Hrs . MH 192. 00 3/01 /89 TO LAW LIBRARY - BRIEFS IN THEILMAN CASE 1 . 1 Hrs . MH 132 . 00 4/ 10/89 DRAFTING BRIEF FOR PUBLIC USE HEARING; RESEARCH 4. 9 Hrs . MH 588 . 00 4/ 11 /89 COMPLETE FINAL DRAFT OF BRIEF; OFFICE CALL W/ CLIENT 7 . 5 Hrs . MH 900. 00 4/ 12/89 AMENDMENTS TO BRIEF; PREP ARGUMENT; TRIAL; RESEARCH CITY ' S BRIEF; CONFERENCES W/ CLIENT , ETC . 9. 3 Hrs . MH $ 1 , 116 . 00 4/ 17/89 re : transcript ; ph call from client 0. 2 Hrs . MH 24 . 00 4/ 18/89 review oral decision ; preliminary drafting of Findings 0. 6 Hrs . MH 72. 00 4/20/89 Drafting Findings and Decision 1 . 7 Hrs . MH 204. 00 4/25/89 Findings/Order 0. 4 Hrs . MH 48. 00 5/02/89 research and draft - Motion for fees; revisions to Findings and Order 0. 6 Hrs. MH 72. 00 5/04/89 research and draft - Brief in support of Motion for fees 0. 7 Hrs . MH 84. 00 5/08/89 complete Brief ; draft affidavit of fees; review billings 1 . 6 Hrs . MH 192. 00 May 9, 1989 RANDY CORMAN 5%09/b9 No-te for Prese Ition ; ph calls to Court 1 Larry ' s office dates for presentation ; conf with client 1 . 1 Hrs . MH 132 . 00 INTEREST ON PRIOR UNPAID BALANCE 28. 59 BALANCE 6 , 441 . 69 PLEASE NOTE : PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED BY JUN 1 TO AVOID INTEREST CHARGE ; INTEREST CALCULATED AT 18% PER ANNUM ON AMOUNTS OVER 30 DAYS May 9 , 1989 RANDY CORMAN 9 CITY OF RENTON,WASHING1 and all other parties in interest in the above ORDINANCE NO.4182 described lands and improvements, if any,AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF as provided by law, to prepare the neces- iENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZ- sary petition for condemnation; and cor- IING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN mence and prosecute such action in thePROPERTYANDPROPERTYRIGHTSSuperiorCourtinandfortheCountyofOYEMINENTDOMAINPROVIDINGKingagainstalltheownersandinterested POR THE PAYMENT THEREOF; parties in the hereinabove described prop- AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY erty; and to acquire the aforedescribed TO PREPARE A PETITION FOR CON- property and property rights for the CityofDEMNATIONINTHESUPERIORRenton. Such proceedings shall be to Oe justmnheAFFIDAVITOFPUBLIOF; COUKINGRT INANDANDFOR RTHETHEPROSECU-COUNTY appropriate determin the of such property sation andpropertyTIONTHEREOFFORTHEACQUISI- rights by the City of Renton. 1TION OF SUCH PROPERTY AND SECTION III: Compensation for the ucl r u v 13 n n e r_ beingfirst PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR ROADWAY acquisition of said property and property PURPOSES (HONEY CREEK ASSOCI- rights shall be from the City of Renton'sthathe/she is the Chief Clerk of the TES—R-014-84/PPUD 015-84). General Fund. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SECTION IV: Nothing in this Ordinance R NTON,WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS shall be construed as a waiver by the City FOLLOWS: of Renton of its right to decline to takeandVALLEYDAILYT ; SECTION I: The City Council finds pay for said property and property rights Kent Edition • Renton Edition • acquisition of the following described prop- after the amount of Just Compensation has efty and property rights is necessary and been ascertained, and within the time for a public purpose and use, I.E. roadway allowed by law. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a wef p irposes, the properties to be acquired SECTION V: This Ordinance shall be are legal newspapers and are now and have being described on Exhibit "A" which is effective upon its passage, approval, and months prior to the date of publication referred incorporated herein as if fully set forth. The five days after its publication. Oity of Renton is authorized by laws and PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this in the English language continually as daily nt statutes of the State of Washington to 17th day of October, 1988. County,Washington.The Valley Daily News haf appropriate lands and property rights, Maxine E. Motor thkoof eminent newspaper by order of the Superior Court of ail domain within h theextsecisecorporateof itsrights limits necessary APPROVED BY THE MAYORCitythis Clerk17th King County. fit the above-stated purpose.day of October, 1988. SECTION II: The City Attorney is hereby Earl Clymer authorized and directed to commence con Mayor The notice in the exact form attached,was publ damnation proceedings against the owners Approved as for form: Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition i. 111U 111.1 11. Lawrence J.Warren supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers City Attorney during the below stated period.The annexed notice a EXHIBIT"A" The North 20 feet of the following Ordinance No . 4132 described parcel of land. Commencing at the West 1/4 corner was published on O r t c 1 -'r .)1 1 J' L a 1 of Section 4,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washing- ton; Thence North a distance of 608.36 feet; The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Thence South 88°18'09" East a dis- tance of 1010.7 feet to the True Point of Sum of $ 9 9 . 2 0 • Beginning; Thence South 0°39'36" East a dis- tance of 281.09 feet; Thence North 0°53'38" East a dis- tance of 237.90 feet; Thence North 88°19'09" West a dis- tance of 281.84 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 D tliay of is o v ig( LESS: The South 109 feet of the West 140 feet. LESS: Street EXHIBIT"A" The South 10 feet of the North 30 feet of the following described parcel of land. Not Public for the State of Washington,Commencing at the West 1/4 corner residing at Federal Way, of Section 4,Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washing- King County, Washington. ton; Thence North a distance of 609.36 VDN#87 Revised 11/86 feet; Thence South 88°18'09" East a dis- tance of 1010.7 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 0°39'36" West a dis- tance of 238.09 feet; Thence South 88°18'36" East a dis- tance of 281.09 feet; Thence North 0°53'38" East a dis- tance of 237.90 feet; Thence North 88°19'09" West a dis- tance of 281.84 feet to the True Point of Beginning. LESS: The South 109 feet of the West 140 6 0 CITY OF RENTON sE.N TO* FINANCE/CITY CLERK'S OFFICE I;c.•-',.'S-:,-'!'. 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 OCT 21 '88 11 ,'... J ;(\ * I 0 Li 1.0 7 0 2a11:1.:::11. FWD 'FT 11E: E X P 1) ..ciFTrp: : * : 9)-014.c,, - - * 9 1 29T 1-1 1',1 cITY OF ilENT°14 1.pic cim pi w pi 5.:.:3,i-"i 1. 1:;:E T L.11,;:1,4 10 :1 Fi:N DE R 0 CHUCK YOUNGQUIST r4C°1" FICE 12110 SE 96th OF RENTON WA98055crryCLERK'S IM!!!!!1!iliffilhillitill!I CITY OF RENTON LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk October 21, 1988 Honey Creek Associates Attention: Mr. Tomberg & Mr. Santa 5611 - 119th SE, Suite #2 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Re; Honey Creek Associates - PPUD-015-84 & R-014-84 Dear Mr. Tomberg and Mr. Santa: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of October 17, 1988, adopted Ordinance No. 4182 authorizing the acquisition of certain property and property rights along NE 23rd Street by eminent domain. A copy of the ordinance is attached for your records. Please contact this office if you have further questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON CGS % l-t0 / Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk cc: Zoning Division Hearing Examiner Parties of Record: If attachment desired, please request. Enclosures 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 v- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4182 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AND PROPERTY RIGHTS BY EMINENT DOMAIN PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A PETITION FOR CONDEMNATION IN THE SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING AND FOR THE PROSECUTION THEREOF FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SUCH PROPERTY AND PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES (HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES - R-014-84/PPUD 015-84) . THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The City Council finds acquisition of the following described property and property rights is necessary and for a public purpose and use, i . e . roadway purposes , the properties to be acquired being described on Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth . The City of Renton is authorized by laws and statutes of the State of Washington to appropriate: lands ar.d property rights, through the exercise of its rights of eminent domain within its corporate limits necessary for the above-stated purpose . SECTION II :The City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to commence condemnation proceedings against the owners and Ell other parties in interest in the above described lands and mprovements , if any, as provided by law; to prepare the necessary petition for condemnation; and commence and prosecute such action in he Superior Court in and for the County of King against all the owners and interested parties in the hereinabove described property; and to acquire the aforedescribed property and property rights for 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4182 the City of Renton. Such proceedings shall be to determine the just compensation for the appropriate of such property and property rights by the City of Renton. SECTION III: Compensation for the acquisition of said property and property rights shall be from the City of Renton's General Fund. SECTION IV: Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed as a waiver by the City of Renton of its right to decline to take and pay for said property and property rights after the amount of Just Compensation has been ascertained, and within the time allowed by law. SECTION V: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 17th day of October 1988 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 17th da of October 1988 . r. Earl Clymer,! ayo Approved as to form: Laver n,ate€57 Attorney Date of Publication: October 21 , 1988 ORD:24-3/29/88-as . 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4182 EXHIBIT "An The North 20 feet of the following described parcel of land. Commencing at the West 1/4 corner of Section 4 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington; Thence North a distance of 609 . 36 feet; Thence South 88 ' 18'09" East a distance of 1010 . 7 feet to the Trte Point of Beginning; Thence South 0' 39'36" West a distance of 238 . 09 feet; Thence South 88 ' 18 '36" East a distance of 281. 09 feet; Thence North 0' 53"38" East a distance of 237 . 90 feet; Thence North 88 ' 19 '09" West a distance of 281. 84 feet to the True Point of Beginning. LESS: The South 109 feet of the West 140 feet. LESS : Street a, O a i Y• q ,• 1 •1 ` ii; 2 r J 11, 00 ^ 1 c,• tolQ'.;°; 4 3 4 5 Z q ti ' o k. i \ 9 °.. • q ^ 0° 1 0 .ji'i. 5I it°` L' iyolo Iio10 . tiD 4 M1q o 8 p08 la : .lol. 0' oo yo I h b I b' . , 7?. j o030 40 Dose 61100 60 (' 0-,.>, ;., 00'90 V ., 0672.30 3 • 1 i 6d 6 O i I h 2 98' t23 BA -/.S_/JE ----0,. ... 529.64 0 00 No" ;I 2 4 T I N 1 e•.es o s -,e 7?.30 72.7 S0 S 019210 Ih s• , 0090 `Ob k IR Q I 72..7 /a o • '' Q• NPh344so->N in,a A 72110 l . 72,50 P'''16 ' o 15 ' m ,>140 ' of 13 : a 12 % 11 0',;,. 10 o° v p p 01 72ioO ^ D7LJ 1 n rn Di') "016 0/QO 0/70 O 0/60 • 0/5o 0/40 o/Jo 4 Z. 30 * h e1. W O •S. BB •/6-/7E. 687.44 0/20 0//0 `" O/00 v. 7l•.9 7P.29 ' 72.3/ 72.,! 72....3 ( f 72.3/72.2.9 y 9SVs 86.3E7 < 3 79 80 74 Ilyl0 v / 1/8,9- /G-7W it410 i294.9.7 O G2 G/ G4 089G 3¢ S ` l 26 25.•. . • % 123g M ?`SgD o 3 40 28 , . 27 a 40 : % o .24 ti. r 19 Oh5cpio ,Ipl, 1O ` % -oh °` ot* 23J,0 ' M 23 c - 22 , ' I 21 . a 20 0 - Z oZg p 1 Z90 OZb 1 4 p • v OL 3 b a , w 0190 +r° 1 , 4,$ oh. row 7J•8/ 79./4 eo.,/ h, 02 11230 -1bGbp ZOO 18 74.73 9.35 0Z p \tit. 43.95 O I 575¢ GZZO r0 / y, B 30 it , 4 or 8 gE PL 3/p 740 eo G2.2/ 30.E 30.45 3009 sty 1' ale-33 9 10 z 800 /ss/G. 88 iG /6w 930114 4. 71.46 . 7Z.0¢ 77.Z4 r h1\1 61°ZLD `•, SS3/ 140 36 09 S3 17ai V e7 T 13.91 3817 W ' CIJO M 84 T 011 -r VB v W 61tiQ- j y z 41 3315' Ls, 45 ' a - sZ 47 79 d k M h 11 411210 lol b0 \ D : 13 o o h % oti9Lii0 \ 19210 - 29 14 0 •i3 b 000 . 0090 ' Of,' Iwo ` o N 94 D v 2 v 882204 , 15 m s 16 90o' . . z 015,c '.• Z5 Z5_ qh MO 0 . 14rti w o 8$? p 72 .72 7z 72 bB27 55 J•• e) 55 B594 k 87/ 1,1 h O 760609o7L0-Lo'2 J R D C-• U T'.Irs-II a r« essJ 1. t,.-ioio• ZAZ./Z LPG Q .:: i OOOOII VAC, OOOOOOo7,as•20• 0 11 ,40.7/ 0 8/.8-A•to•D,,J.2o• 70o00a0717.20• 7sosol07,c•2QN h-/ VO4 /-rff` ao' N O 70 70 70 70. 1I ./. J' 43, go W y b l 41\II M1 ° S I T"EooI" 00ow e , o ., L a e qln p. er ao 0 b n " I o o V o o• o- o M•Zvi 4 p o ,o0a0 7O 7v 7o y 0• 3y 0 3 P ? o• rk o dr oq a o• 30 t• 14 y I 0 ® xt.o 6BSoYiy° top Ile f o Tl 70 70 S.0S• 2$'•20 s aa•.0-s4 a ire 24/.0y 30.05 01 2• 29M• I 0. 29HG O 3o 1 LS 3/.e79 3 °°Ir o 3/ ¢`5T. . I4* a 4.4 " , ' 12 ISVI IV63 . G 9 6 p • I s a aN: • N01W CITY OF RENTON A° j II 4 L. 30 °wor^I ,D[1'A11TM[NT or rusLlc WORKS Y1 18/ k ` I Igo 01 qi`' : III• 6- • 0• d Ito 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4182 68 2- t 01 VICINITY MAP C J o 7Go6o'J072J.9,o'% '1 u ir3 3 64 JO h-- v sa-,9 os w rwn+ -- 1f O[IIONED DATE Il[NO. 3S.70 /I' 40. •u, o DRAWN sos .1 lq NE. 21ST CHECKED CAL[ PIRO.007.. ZA R' • : I- W 20 • 1 6 2.S/ APPROVED NETT 0/-- - Iv rt. r 1, 4. - • Nf G.• ^'4. utt[u2 v tvull wool. ORDINANCE NO. 4182 EXHIBIT "A" The South 10 feet of the North 30 feet of the following described parcel of land. Commencing at the West 1/4 corner of Section 4 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington; Thence North a distance of 609 . 36 feet; Thence South 88 ' 18'09" East a distance of 1010 . 7 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 0' 39 '36" West a distance of 238 . 09 feet; Thence South 88' 18 '36" East a distance of 281. 09 feet; Thence North 0' 53"38" East a distance of 237 . 90 feet; Thence North 88 ' 19 '09" West a distance of 281. 84 feet to the Trte Point of Beginning. LESS: The South 109 feet of the West 140 feet. LESS: Street ti i N, 4%,. ,••4 , vN o0 h, 1. q n o15 n. o,p tl+ p 5 I D+ 1% 7 ry' o0 8 v i \ Dp D w •O `' pip 'I + lollZD L it° z010 11 n 3. b 9 qti 1+ 00 0030 o4+'loSD 82 y 617" F. 72.30 1' 6+4 BR.G u 0060 w•a 4 O080 r0 s b ` i. 78.3 v04'' 7a. I/sf 6,;- Bb A ! I % 1 2 v N/98 lJ S.BA •/3 /. U 2 4 TI-I . S i o .. 05 o 1 9 .b 72.30 y 72..9 ; " R CN 019210 p, s, 009D o 72..! 'J y N e q o i p` n h IA 4 1:9a nri q w 7:50 ' 7 50 a 15 a ,i •4p • °i !3 t , 12 • V f i o'°. !0 o° 0v yQ p 7 A j D/40 72/00 41 ' t D 7lJ ; 1 •. m q'+ "IDl0/QO 0/70 {1 0/60 OrSO 0/30 Q/20 t)i/ " O/G 0 r:30 n 7'r.3 h 78.29 , rg 1,O S. A8 •/6-/7E. 6e7.4e f 72.1J/ 7Z.3 72..5 1' 7 7P.3/72.2.9 h S 14 AF..3RG(e 3 79 80 74. i90 N8B• /G- '. /7W 12A"IO iZ94.97 GL G2 G/ G4 08.9G 3 S ` 1 28 v 27 a' 2640 0 2 0 . . 24 0 i3s0 M -,r,e k j37av ... 4C ; , Q ° 12`p . pZ6.O ° OL`` o• Zo 0 23 : : 22 ; a 2I ° N 20 e N 190 qA gZS00 Q0 OZ OZ4 Ot3p a p/9 'h 1ti row B/79./4 Bo.,, 030 1dG(,13 :00 :e ,• 1871. 74.7j 9.35 ti 3.93 O l a 02Zo pZrO / 9 D- ' OI B° dao S7S4 42.2/ 3aSG 3o4S 3009 g 3 i r. - W 33. 93E V.OJ Q Z Bap /SS/G nl NBB G /GW 4... OZZ ki ' 72.44 . 7Z•04 7z.24 h 8 44 49 353/ 40.36 09..53 F NJ 17 h V t K. 4l G h h T 13.91 s8z7 W CV-TO M ,. 8 N 9 t° 10 04 11 I2 h o‘ 14 ,°.1%,f1.5t • to 04 • 1 . ltj 3v a r', zs - a t J2117,9 ) 9L i0 ; ^ 9gZ10 a Zgto` a 13G0; Z 13 a, .. ° °° 14 h 0 0 • oBo OgO 10, IDI fro 90130 a N 94990 v 4, , BBi20 IR 15 ' . s16p00100cry .k Ors39 2S 25 7 0140 e : a16, w e. S8? 94 4 2 7Z u' 7Z 72 72 Gil SS % y, 39ti15S k 8e94 vhB7.85 O 76060D07ro-LO'?. ' I' D r{•'+• o A/ ,,- s-re-o• r tLSG tz J 1. , y;_ tplo• 7_AZ./Z CP) - 0 _ t 7soieso7//•to' 7toiosoTos•2O' o• etosens•io• 0 y /. 7/ o N' 7eotose7ro•SI' s/oiose7/i.I(iN HAiD /.rS-1" Ds' N B/B'f 70 70 70 70 70 I e .r. . • h 4-.'_ .. _ __-.-.e/ O-.r. PO . ... 1 tea.___ .. (• o S/ TEy' . 6 br7 OG 1 • b N CN 14 41 m P• L' o, , N ..V U 21 v I 4 0 1 m oa z..1v e^ 3b 3'. oS o ' 4, ie•re os se SA 0. 0. 5 0•' 3 M. ti Zv1.. o° hN \ 1,•• • 35 A4. o o l, c' c -. 1. o Ac• 1 Ac ? p 7o 70 70 • y 0., 0• Ili Qrioo 0 0•50 r.r` I l So 4I' ( C' l/Jk" 1 = i o c Op ,+ 8B y ee s-a c eJ I e c 70 70 IS.OS- 25 1yip Jrea-re-.•t if /ro 24t/.op 0, 2` I p. 291)C :, • /30 • 430.os zo o 1 Z5 LS 3/.09 4g,. I 48 1 Jo 0. 0. r 0 Ly I' a /- 0 T. ' 6* a 14 3?a,r !, . . 3tic' 4:Ib c3 G3 • 6-f N r1 2 4 - 43 M Ac 1o1W CITY OF RENTON V VI y•I O i r e ,DEPARTMENT or rU[LIC WORK[ ORDINANCE NO. 4182II01 ggV ,, 1 VICINITY MAP J :' 68 3 3 64 Jo 0 7C060907=.l..ve% ,,i U V ee•r9-02 . :IO.. -. O[•10N[D DATA VILA NO 35.70 0•• t• •4c.. 2. . 1 J N ev DRAWN e. i o NE. 2lST CALK 11 0 1 See CN[CK[D 1 V VI. _ • h W I r 20 4 2.5/ N[[T Or A, ovD n r----::* 1.. n'1,t.rsLt¢iiI(,JrP,•n.r- CAG-078-88 AGREEMENT RE EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING I . PARTIES: This agreement is entered into between the CITY OF RENTON, a municipal corporation, and ROBERT TOMBERG and JANE DOE TOMBERG, his wife, and /A k SANTA and JANE DOE SANTA, his wife, dba Honey Creek Associates (hereinafter referred to as Associates ) . II . BACKGROUND: Associates seeks to develop a parcel of property within the City of Renton that has been referred to as the Honey Creek Associates PUD. That PUD has been conditioned upon Associates providing a primary means of access to the PUD along N.E. 23rd Street. In order to obtain the necessary right-of-way for that access, it may be necessary for the City of Renton to exercise its powers of eminent domain. This agreement is to establish the terms and conditions under which the City of Renton will use its powers of eminent domain. III . COMPENSATION: III . 1 .Attorney' s Fees: Any eminent domain proceeding will be prosecuted by the Renton City Attorney. His fees, which will be billed at the rate of $125 . 00 per hour, will be paid by Associates on a monthly basis within ten days of receipt of the billings . The duty to pay will be inclusive of any fees incurred in a hearing to establish public use and necessity, whether or not the court enters an order of public use and necessity. It is estimated that the attorney' s fees , up to the point of pretrial preparation, will be approximately $1,500 . 00 from the date of signing of this • agreement henceforth. It is estimated that the attorney' s fees necessary for trial preparation will be an additional $5, 000 . 00, and the attorney' s fees for trial will be an additional $5, 000 . 00 . If these sums are to be exceeded, then the city attorney will contact Associates and negotiate further sums for legal representation. 1II . 2 .Appraiser: It will be necessary, if this matter cannot be negotiated, for the city to hire an appraiser to prepare for trial. Costs of the appraiser will be borne by Associates, but the sum shall not exceed $1, 000 . 00 for the appraisal, $1, 500 . 00 for trial preparation, and $1 , 500 . 00 for attendance at trial unless the sum has been renegotiated between the parties . Associates ' obligation to pay this sum will be to the appraiser, and any contractual relationship will be between Associates and the appraiser. III . 3 . Costs and Attorney's Fees For Condemnee: If this matter goes to trial and the condemnee obtains a verdict for the value of the property at more than ten percent above the last qualifying offer, then the city will be obligated to pay the costs and attorney' s fees of the condemnee, such sum to be established by a King County Superior Court judge . The sum to be offered as a last qualifying offer will be approved by Associates . Should the judge 1 award attorney' s fees and experts ' fees, then Associates shall pay those fees . III . 4 . Cost of Land: Associates shall pay the cost of the land as established through negotiation or trial .Should Associates determine that the cost is excessive, then it may instruct the city to abandon the condemnation, but Associates shall still have an obligation to pay the attorney' s fees, appraiser' s fees, the condemnee' s attorney's fees, and expert's fees as detailed herein.Should Associates choose to abandon the condemnation action, then the PUD will have to be reopened and be subject to further scrutiny and review by the Renton City Council, up to and including a rehearing for preliminary approval of the PUD. III .5 Lien Rights: Any sums owing hereunder not paid within sixty days of submission of a bill therefor, shall be a lien against the real property known as the Honey Creek PUD. DATE:Qc41C 3 1988 . e-; 7-drlRobet/romberc/ Mrs . Jane Doe Tomber• A?ti7a- //( 1- V0/1/4:--7- Mrs . Jane Doe Santa 7Y OF RENTON BY: C‘j\ ° Ea 1 Clymer,(Iay t ATTESTED BY: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk CITY5 .20 :5/5/88 :as . 2 Dob Tomberg 561 l 119 BE Suite I Bellevue, Wa. 98006 0 7 r m w /ww Lawrence J . Warren By City of Renton P.D. Box 624 kenton, Wash, 99O57 Dear Mr. W en: I feel we ar left no choice but to proceed with the acquisition of NE 23rd into the city of Renton. We reluctantly agree to shouldar 7he costs of that acquisition though the city reaps the benifit. We do not fe l we can wait the time it would take to go back through the pud proc ss to draft a more equitable document . Bob Tomberg 4retCITY OF RENTON LL FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk October 4, 1988 Honey Creek Associates Attn: Mr. Tomberg & Mr. Santa 5611 119th SE, Suite #2 Bellevue, WA 98006 Re: Honey Creek Associates/PPUD-015-84 Rezone R-014-84 Dear Mr. Tomberg and Mr. Santa: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of October 3 , 1988, adopted the attached Planning and Development Committee report in response to your request of July 15, 1988 for clarification of access to your property viaNE23rdStreet. As you will note, the report states that your request is an application for a modification to a PPUD and should be handled by the administrative staff. Please contact the Zoning Administrator, 235-2550, or feel free to contact this office if you have any futher questions. Yours truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor, CMC City Clerk Enclosure cc: Don Ericksen, Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 1 October 3. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 287 Public Works: Public Works/Utilities Department requested review of ordinance provisions Termination of Water concerning termination of water service to comply with State law. Refer to Service Ordinance Utilities Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Petitions were submitted by Ray Gervais, 506 Windsor Place NE, Renton, Citizen Comment: Gervais containing 556 signatures of residents supporting retention of Fire Station No. Petitions for Retention 12 in its present location at Harrington Avenue NE and NE 9th Street. of Fire Station No. 12 Comprehensive Plan: Added letter was read from Robert W. Thorpe, R. W. Thorpe & Associates, Southeast - R. W. Thorpe Inc., 1300 Alaska Building, 2nd and Cherry, Seattle, requesting Request for Review Comprehensive Plan update for an 80-acre parcel located north of 292nd, east of Talbot Hill Road and west of SR-167 in conjunction with Dr. Heye's property. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS LETTER TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL AS TO WHEN DISCUSSION REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES WILL TAKE PLACE. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Planning and regarding the appeal of rezone for Good Shepherd of Washington Group Development Committee Home on NE 19th Street, east of Shelton Avenue NE and west of Union Appeal: Good Shepherd Avenue NE. The applicant had requested a rezone from R-1 to G-1, and a Group Home Rezone (NE conditional use permit to develop the site with a group home for six 19th Street), R-010-88 developmentally disabled adults. The applicant appealed the Hearing Examiner's decision #4 requiring an automated irrigation system. As to the Hearing Examiner's recommendation on the rezone, the Committee found there was no error, and recommended concurrence in the Hearing Examiner's recommendation. As to the Hearing Examiner's decision on the conditional use permit, the committee found an error of law in applying the landscaping and irrigation requirements on the group home without some provision being made for the hybrid nature of the use. Therefore, the committee recommended that the Hearing Examiner's decision, which requires a fully automatic irrigation system, be reversed on the condition that: The applicant post a $1,000 bond for the purpose of replacement of landscaping in the event of loss of trees, shrubbery, and/or ground cover. Any diminution of the bond amount to replace the landscaping shall be replaced by the applicant. This bond requirement shall be in effect for three (3) years. If there is a pattern of non-maintenance over a three (3) year period, the applicant herein shall be required to install an automated irrigation system as approved by city staff. If there is a pattern of proper maintenance over three (3) years, the bond may be released. However, due to the conditional use nature of the group home, the city will always be entitled to require automated irrigation if it appears that the landscaping is being ignored. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. PUD: Preliminary,_Honey Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Creek. PPUD-015-84 regarding the Honey Creek PPUD access, referred on 6/20/88. The Committee recommended that this matter should be an application for a modification to a PPUD and should be handled by the administrative staff. Therefore, this matter is being deleted from the Committee referral list. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for first reading: Rezone: Renton Public An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of approximately Works Department, R- two acres of property located on Carr Road, east of Valley Medical Center 021-88 (Carr Road and south of the present Covenant Church building from R-1, single family Reservoir) residential use, to P-1, public use; City of Renton Public Works Department; South Talbot Hill reservoir; File No. R-021-88. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT October 3 , 1988 HONEY CREEK PPUD ACCESS (Referred 6/20/88) The Planning and Development Committee has reviewed Honey Creek Associate's request dated July 15, 1988 and believes that it is an application for a modification to a PPUD and should be handled by the administrative staff. The Planning and Development Committee therefore recommends this item be deleted from the Planning and Development Committee referrals. Nancy Mews, C it ze Richard St edicke n Reed PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT October 3 , 1988 HONEY CREEK PPUD ACCESS (Referred 6/20/88) The Planning and Development Committee has reviewed Honey Creek Associate's request dated July 15, 1988 and believes that it is an application for a modification to a PPUD and should be handled by the administrative staff. The Planning and Development Committee therefore recommends this item be deleted from the Planning and Development Committee referrals. ytitC1 Nancy Ma ews, C it Richard St edicke Q in Reed Vl/bUCL/ ///j/I/f(4.L) CITY OF RENTON 0 Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney iLL Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell - Mary deVuono, Assistant City Attorneys September 28, 1988 Mr. Bob Tomberg 5611 119th S .E . , Suite 2 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Dear Mr. Tomberg: Thank you for your letter of September 22 , 1988, received by my office on September 23 , 1988 . If you will recall, I forwarded to you a copy of an agreement to secure the city' s approval of an ordinance authorizing condemnation of N.E . 23rd. The city council has specifically directed that this agreement be signed and returned before they will pass the ordinance authorizing the construction. If you have misplaced that document please let me know, and I will forward another copy to you . I have forwarded a copy of your letter to the Planning and Development Committee, anticipating that they will remove this topic from their agenda. If you have any questions please let me know. 77 C7IN Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor Planning & Development Committee A8 . 31 : 63 . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 4$ CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney LL Daniel Kellogg - Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell - Mary deVuono, Assistant City Attorneys September 20 , 1988 Mr. Bob Tomberg Honey Creek Associates 5611 119th S .E . , Suite 2 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Dear Mr. Tomberg: Your recent correspondence with the Planning & Development Committee of the Renton City Council has been referred to me for response . The committee has tabled your request to modify the requirement of obtaining the necessary right-of-way and improving N.E . 23rd. That requirement was established by the city council following a series of public hearings and council and committee meetings . If you believed the condition to be improper, then you had an appeal right which you could ha""e exercised. By failing to i appeal, the council ' s decision stands . Pursuant to city ordinance, you have the right to petition the city for a modification to an approved PUD. If the modification is deemed minor, the city staff can make that modification. However, something such as major access to the development site would hardly be considered minor. To obtain a major modification to a planned unit development requires a full public hearing before the Hearing Examiner.If you are unhappy with that decision, then it could be appealed to the city council . The city council has not maintained its jurisdiction over your PUD. It has tried to clarify aspects of its decision that any party felt was ambiguous . However, the requirement to obtain the right-of-way and construct the road is not ambiguous . The council committee did not feel that you had presented it with any proposal to modify the condition .The fact that your technical expert believed that the road was not necessary is not an adequate basis for the city council to review its prior decision . Now that the city council has had an opportunity to review your request, it believes that it is an application for a modification to a PUD and should be handled by the administrative staff . Undoubtedly, this will result in a declaration that it is a major modification and referral to the Hearing Examiner for a future hearing. Pnct Office Rnx 676 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton Wachinatnn 9R0S7 - 0061 ?SS-R67R Mr. Bob Tomberg September 20, :1988 Page 2 I hope this adequately answers your inquiry. Very, truly yours, 1--) Lawrence . " Warren LJW:as . cc : Mayor Nancy Mathews Richard Stredicke John Reed Don Erickson / Fred Kaufman t/ A8 . 31 : 36 . Bob Tomberg RECEIVEDHoneyCreekAssociates 5611 119 SE Suite 2 Bellevue, Wa. 913006 JUL 2 5 1988 CITY OFRENTONLawrenceJ. Warren CITYCOUNCILCityofRenton PO box 62e Renton, Wa. 98057 July 15, 19B8 Dear Mr . Warren: I am writing in response to your letter on July 12, 1988. 1 sinccerly regret my lack o* attendance at the planning and development committee meeting on June 7;0, 198S as it was I who originally requested that meeting. I do appreciate tieing able to respond to the committee' s questions and will tr.., to do s a _ thi., time. First, we have never proposed to have N. E. 2=rd as anything other than omer e l p! C:,J.s,E review the 1.eter from Mel Easter of Li;'a.uni"! Design Croup inc. whi ch should arrive in your office shortly. ) I ca.!) certainly understand the city' s desire to have full city streets developed at the expense of a third party, but to suggest that it was our intention to have a secondary access along N. E. 23rd is wrong. Second, we have not and are not planning a secondary access to our project unless required to do so by the city. Third, access by way of Devil ' s Elbow Road to our project has been examined as completely as I believe is pos_sib1e by experts on all sides. There has been no one from any source who has the credentials to make an educated opinion tha be? i e"e the De 1 s El bow Road should be opened at all . Finally. it was cur belief that the condemnation proceeding as well as the purchase the . ch= o- way for N. E. _=rd would be approximatly s 5s 0r_ r_ The mprc':-ement cost for' the road would be $ 60. 000. 00. The density l of this _ e_t Pa_ been: cut in halt since the begining of our annexation at-tempi- wjth the 0 ty. There is nn cash set aside for extraneous purposes. In _.._ ._ .e doubt ...h: s projectject will be profitable at all . In c( n, i u_i _Ir,., we only want N. E. 23rd street for emergency access purposes. re F-=tate. in pre\•.: c,.,.s _ . !- espondance, i t was Mr . Murry who insisted that the emero nc_ ,: access L . expanded to be a full city street. We tried to accommodat him <:.ncd agreed to or along with his concept. The reality of the situation now ne a: e,,. It:_. to issue "blank acquiretherightq..... " _ _ -- _ check" to q of wary. We certainl La+.rlr-_ _ ' f,4.,_ to oa. that . Sincerly ttob mbe q ' cc: r_r. F' •nni no Development Committee CITY O ? RENT ON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg - Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell - Mary deVuono, Assistant City Attorneys July 12, 1988 Mr. Bob Tomberg Honey Creek Associates 5611 119th S.E., Suite 2 Bellevue, Washington, 98006 Dear Mr. Tomberg: I am writing to you at the request of the Planning, and Development Committee of the Renton City Council. Your request to that committee to relieve you of the duty of obtaining the right-of-way and developing a portion of N.E. 23rd came up for hearing on Thursday, June 30, 1988. You were not in attendance at that meeting and the committee did not wish to proceed without you present to represent your interests. I was informed, subsequently, that there was a lapse in communication and you believed that the meeting was to be held the following evening, July 1, 1988. The Planning and Development Committee would like to have you make a firm proposal to them as to what you wish done. For example, Mitch Murray continues to suggest to the council that the money you are going to invest on N.E. 23rd would be better spent on the Devil's Elbow Road. The Planning and Development Committee recalls that N.E. 23rd was supposed to serve as a secondary access to your property and not merely as an emergency access. The committee would like to know if you are planning secondary access to your property and, if so, where it should be located besides N.E. 23rd. The committee would also like to know what you believed you were going to have to invest in the improvement of N.E. 23rd, and how much you plan to invest in an alternative. Do you plan to use N.E. 23rd as an emergency access only and not provide a means of secondary access? Once the committee has received a firm written proposal from you they will schedule another committee meeting and you will be notified of that meeting. Very truly yours, Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as. cc: Mayor Planning & Development Committee A8.25:34. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 Ppuc- 01s- i' Jane 20, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 185 improvement district to finance the roadway, and asked if development in the area justifies construction of that improvement. Marjorie Richter, 300 Meadow Avenue North, Renton, noted that the program does not reflect improvements to relieve N. 3rd and N. 4th Street traffic other than widening the undercrossing under I-405 at Sunset and 3rd. She questioned how traffic from the additional lanes would be accommodated by existing streets; noted her understanding that funds contributed by E & H Properties would be used for improvements in North Renton; and suggested that of N. 4th Street be connected to Sunset Boulevard as a traffic mitigation measure. Mr. Norris indicated that the North Renton benefit district includes the I-405 undercrossing, and there was no attempt to address any of the specific improvements in the North Renton neighborhood in the TIP since that area is being reviewed separately. Darrell Igelmund, 3602 Lake Washington Boulevard, Renton, referenced priority #6 and #24, widening the NE 44th Street interchange and widening Lake Washington Boulevard, and reiterated provisions of Resolution No. 2708, adopted by Council to protect the single family character of the Kennydale neighborhood. He felt that the TIP violates that agreement by the City, and he expressed hope that Council would delete #6 since it would add more traffic on Lake Washington Boulevard, and modify #24 to delete widening and instead reconstruct the existing roadway to include curb, gutter, sidewalk and bike path. He requested that Council consider changing the designation of Lake Washington Boulevard from a secondary arterial to a designation more in line with residential development. Theresa Zimmerman, 813 North 1st Street, Renton, referenced the traffic study prepared by William Popp on the North Renton area which states that no matter what is done, Renton has traffic problems. She proposed that funds contributed by E & H Properties be used to encourage other means of travel than the automobile for entering Renton, and felt that Renton citizens have a changing attitude about accommodating more traffic through the city. Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, indicated concern that the TIP was not available to residents in advance; expressed disappointment that the plan does not reflect solutions besides accommodating higher volumes of pass-through traffic; and concurred that extension of both N. 4th Street and Houser Way would relieve pressure on North Renton streets. She also felt that use of developer funds on the I-405 undercrossing at NE 3rd Street would violate the original intent for use of funds in North Renton, and referred to Resolution No. 2708 which stated that traffic volume on N. 3rd Street shall remain at present level or below. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Upon inquiry, Mayor Clymer explained that issuance of the TIP was delayed due to need to finalize North Renton transportation plan, which was not accepted by Council last week. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, HUGHES, NELSON, MATHEWS. 3 NAYS: REED, TRIMM, STREDICKE. CARRIED. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ARTERIAL STREET PLAN TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. CARRIED. RECESS MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 9:25 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:35 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present. AUDIENCE COMMENT In response to correspondence from Bob Tomberg, developer of Honey Creek Citizen Comment: Murray PPUD, (Consent Agenda item 7.g.), Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Honey Creek PPUD _ 's Renton, presented a letter opposing development of NE 23rd Street and Access supporting improvement of Devil's Elbow Road as alternate access into Honey Creek PPUD. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. June 20, 1988, from Mitch Murray to Renton City council, page 1 of 2, regarding PPUD-015-84. To: Renton City Council: Robert J. Hughes Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Nancy L. Mathews Toni Nelson John W. Reed Richard M. Stredicke Thomas W. Trimm CITv "" -'"r" TrIN cc: Mayor of Renton: 1.111 t• ag Earl Clymer D FCR-CLEPICSMIC-E1-Renton City Attorney: Lawrence J. Warren OWN From: Mitch Murray 2813 NE 23rd Place Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: NE 23rd Street access to the Honey Creek PPUD (PPUD-015-84) References: 1 . Letter to Don Erickson of the Renton Building and Zoning Department, from Bob Tomberg of Honey Creek Associates, dated May 18, 1988, I am writing this letter in order to provide comments about Mr. Tomberg' s letter (reference 1) and in order to provide additional information about the subject of street access to the Honey Creek PPUD. First I would like to complement Mr. Tomberg for writting his letter and attempting to pursue alternate street access into his development. I support his attempt to avoid a costly and time consuming court battle over condemnation and minimum street code requirements. As you know, the currently approved street access to this development is via a 60 foot right-of-way on Jefferson Ave. NE and via a 40 foot right-of-way on NE 23rd Street. These street accesses are shown on Figure 1. The access on NE 23rd Street will require additional right-of-way acquisition since there currently is only a 20 foot right-of-way. This right-of-way acquisition is strongly opposed by the established single family neighborhood in this area. Much time and money will be spent, which could better be spent on the development and other things, even if condemnation is successful in the courts. The Honey Creek PPUD will die if condemnation is attempted and fails in the courts. In either case much time and money will be waNsted. In addition there are legal questions about whether the currently approved 40 foot access on NE 23rd Street meets code requirements or whether it needs to be enlarged to 60 feet. June 20, 1988, from Mitch Murray to Renton City Council, page 2 of 2, regarding PPUD-0] 34. The above currently approved street access was approved over two years ago by the city council on April 14, 1986. Things have changed in the last two years. In addition to the development of the above mentioned legal problems associated with the currently approved street access, there are now increased reasons why Devils Elbow roadway should be used for access to the Honey Creek development. One of the original objections to the use of Devils Elbow as either a primary access or gated emergency access was the fact that much of it was outside of the City of Renton and spending Renton funds on upgrading it thus seemed unpalatable. Devils Elbow is now part of Renton as a result of a King County Boundary Review Board requirement on the Honey Creek annexation. This roadway which was officially established in 1894 is now Renton' s responsibility. After the heavy rains of November 1986 parts of the roadway west of the elbow part of Devils Elbow roadway settled a few inches. As a result the roadway was closed in early 1987 and a geotechnical analysis of this west part of the roadway was completed by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. It was estimated to cost $94,000 to stabilize the roadbed. It was decided to shut down the Honey Creek sewer system since it's high pressure force main is under this part of Devils Elbow roadway. The roadway was also closed to traffic. The Devils Elbow roadway and Honey Creek sewer system have remained out of service to this day. So far the old sewer system, under Sunset Highway, has been able to handle the sewer flow without overflowing. Eventually as more people hook up to the sewer system, and/or as the rainy season gets underway, we will have a raw sewage overflow problem. Clearly we need to spend the $94,000 to stabilize the roadbed so that we can safely and reliably put the 1.2 million dollar Honey Creek sewer system back into service. I propose that, at the same time that the roadbed is stabilized, it be widened from its current pavement width of 18 feet to 20 feet so that it can be used as an emergency access to the Honey Creek development from Edmonds Avenue NE. The developer should supply funds for this widening, from the funds that would have been spent on NE 23rd Street. This seems only appropriate since the development will be using the honey creek sewer system. The use of Devils Elbow roadway as an emergency access to the Honey Creek Development would mean that NE 23rd Street would no longer be needed for access to the development. This would avoid the legal problems associated with NE 23rd Street and would reduce the adverse impacts that this development will have on the established single family neighborhood to the west. Figure 2 shows what the revised access plan utilizing Devils Elbow as an emergency access would look like. Sincerely, Z4 Mitch Murray r` VICINITY MA t eafuo AVE. 4-14, 1 1 I •. eY w'S wc.ca Y I' III I• /" /-.+-. d.,.______ - 1i- _ wa' _.. .- iii : 111( I c ( r r 7 4- 7 irl in.. . 4 rs 613. xl.tlnp R-1 zone r L 7 , 7,,,, some 1,,, 1 1 IL.. .. I SI II I 16` I .'\ ‘L‘‘ t\\\ t1.\% \ \\\ . \ \\i [) \\. i :"' t• = '"":.:f- L_ v!\, \ \% Or..nb.It 11? \\,l- \, t,\\\ \ r A '' ',V 0 P LOT'B': 33.64 ACRES 7—\ W s\ AV- , N \ 1/4 7\_ — i N'•...,\, ' `, N\ , " N, -_- ,,:' . 4.‘ \\\\\\\\\.\ 7/% 7---- ----__:_. 7, ' .R ---:.. 4'\\\'' i\\\\\\ \., \ '. , , N \\.. \ 1.// p11117::// —'\--- \I. ‘ - .. N \ • \' \ \ ) i Op \\,--- :----:------ - -,:---:---/-//i)\)/( ') \'\, ‘.\''',, s- 7\ .'''‘'' i , r,- ......--- , , ; 1'O 1 i YI 4 •ff 4TAIMIe• .,1 • , / .-;/ r W. r--\\ \ -i -i 1 . 1,), g k -., . . , „ .--) \A..\. A. , , ,,,v :.,, ,,.. —. ---:-----=--->Y; -</-...: ,.-- , - i 1_,JI .. \\ 51/ \.1,,i, ,__ 1 _ -cr;,... .. ! . _''r.-\__. j7\_\\A, :<.4,. c...t \__.\,\ , s,\ ,,,,,,,.,;,__ T-L----=/,, 1,e.;,_,,,;/,../>/:/;'.-- ,vi l ,, y. s5l?wooer—.. ; 1 'j (S STACKED Fl...11/cf IN¢ ~ 114 II \ Y.,; • N:, \ ,\,\ U I I I I# 316._ N° • 7 \\\ 11 11 S\ \\\\ I 1 r 1 A . Il\ il , ,_ 4..*!r., / , . 6:,• s.4% e, \,\ 1 I iItT1 .OVEN SPACEFOR 1.( ` I I vt, i ACTIVEiVASSIVE RECREA ION• V I II ,1 LOT A':176 R 41;1r i i F`\\ \\ TOq A \\\\\! 2 / i k e ST KED FL TS .- i I j: 7_,: 7 + 11 I O W LE_j,N1Tb= IA \ ` i, :.....,1 7:"(_....1-00 1-. tIzn 1. ,` t 0,, z„_ t .* , 4_-= + I dA(U\ s.' ,/- 1 A' I\'. - :\ \ • atLUI-1t- •— --"-- Wf: JEFFERSON °0 AVE-Ka' - xl.ting R-2 zon.1 RZ2ROL--- 1 l^ J r-i o L >> = r--- 2OJgMa$ cA LE . 165 F 1 M F\ Gug.a j. \.. r i Attachment to letter from Mitch Murray to Renton City Council, dated June 20, 1988 . F T U fl — 015—$t. j• VICINITY MAP lilallo AVE. 1 1' .I?, / • rem . •..'6 wr:.6I ILIL V i• 1 pi / 7,„----- „...---- V. , 7 _ 11 (1 1'I III r 1h1. ?„ 7\N I1 i riLi L. a_r .. T. N \N\p existing R-1 zone i a•eb. 7/, , 1 1, i'' ( J. '— i ii !I 1/./(/( 7 7 1 1.; it I it VA \ i s; q( \\\\\ \ T Q greenbelt p \\, \,1\,. \\ 1 \ \ 1 \ VI h i '' ''‘ \ 0 Vs R LOT'8•: 33.64 ACRES I"' N k-17-\ 1/4\‘_ A It\V\ /r,,,,.., „ v.- N,A.N.,..--:--,.-\„ ‘\k\\ cks\ s ‘ 4 W ss.,' '. A \ ii,, yr .r-\ \N \.\ k \\A'V '' \ ',& \\\ If) ) Ns .' A 1 7.------_ ----_—_ —:—. 2 . ) , . f - ' It\ \.\\: 1 1\.:\\ M J /- r \ N \°:.. 1x... k. k .4 ` E [TAIMID __— \ / (j/ 10,1 1 0 _,,, j' ).\ 1.) e))\ 0: y Jam• / i lim‘ : 'Ilit z.- 1 ) h 440 f A8 1C 1‘. :\ ( ( . Pl W; rm. 1 A 9 0404-1 tk\ kt.\\ v\ \ \‘\, , \ \ i /32 . 1 Ilik:: --A, A'\' 1,\ \ 1 WVst \ti ,! . pi. .,,s, vlx il141-....4_,,,1 , ‘y \\ IR, . .=:,, r,.:::sico...,101-0 1 II\ (c10' LOT' '• t \ f-. —.f-: 0-2*.lt ..; 3\ \ k\\A) i Q 8T xED Fl T8' i — )- — I f,, Va (cr Or ( Okiiii'il'. 447-s------=--.- -___- ' )- '' ' - \*., V( 57- --- / ) . 1... ,, ,...„_;‘,,,____,,,..n., H__:,.i.„.„..7s \,,, s,... ,....„......„.... 4,._ 7-- 2,., 0,Th J$ ‘ r. il.,1P7.1 •••-ial. .etz2t____.,. c- 1 1 i\) A \ , 5_______,-.!------) // / 10/ 1 11' r Th----- A _ . ___ __,;„:,. , \ 7—,— , ......„ J„.., r t.\‘', \ \ JEFFERSON a AWE.NA. „ existing R-2 tone oR01- - J ° it ' --)Cc2) 1 = I L1Cc r-rnr c-\77 i Z°JLN88 F,GuKa. 2j Sc.,c 16 5 F'rAN Attachment to letter from Mitch Murray to Renton City Council, dated June 20, 1988 . f'PIJI0_ O1S 8,i_ June 20. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 187 PUD, Preliminary, Honey Building & Zoning Department transmitted letter from Robert Tomberg, Creek, PPUD-015-84 Honey Creek Associates, 5611-199th SE, Suite 2, Bellevue, requesting change in Honey Creek PPUD to provide only emergency access along NE 23rd Street instead of full access due to pending lawsuit by resident opposing acquisition of roadway property. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Gene Ledbury, Planning Commission Board/Commission: 1988- Chairman, recommending adoption of the Planning Commission Work 1989 Planning Program Priorities for 1988 and 1989. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Commission Work SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL REFER THIS DOCUMENT TO Program Priorities COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FOR DISCUSSION AT COUNCIL BUDGET RETREAT. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee of the Whole Committee of the Whole report regarding 1988 work program update and budget modifications. The Budget: 1988 Work Committee met with staff in a special work session to discuss a series of Program Update and programs that require staff support and budget allocations in the form of Budget Modifications mid-year program and budget adjustments. After consideration, the Committee recommended the following: Policy: Establishment of A. Proposed reorganization/establishment of Community Development Community Development Department ($59,000): The Committee recommends that the Department administration's proposal be approved as presented and referred to Ways and Means Committee. Approval will include fund appropriations for a new department head, a principal planner position, equipment and furnishings for the new employees and minor renovations to accommodate changes in 1988. This approval is subject to Ways and Means Committee review and approval of the justification for new salary proposals and reclassification adjustment. (*See below.) Personnel: New Position, B. Request for new position (current planner)($30,000): After reviewing Planner workload demands and comparable staffing levels in other cities, the Committee recommended that the administration be authorized to hire a new employee to serve in the current planning section of the Planning Department. Annexation: North Soos C. Funding and authorization for fact-finding study for proposed North Creek Soos Creek Annexation ($45,000): The Committee reviewed the results of the survey conducted in the proposed annexation area and accepted input from staff and a representative from the Fire District 40 Board of Commissioners. The following recommendations should be referred to Council for action: 1. A fact-finding study should be funded by the City to determine the impacts of the proposed annexation on the City and residents in the annexation area. 2. Council should concur with the recommendation of the annexation committee and include only the areas identified as Fairwood, Cascade and Petrovitsky as shown in the survey document within the fact-finding study. 3. The study should analyze the impacts of an annexation on Fire District #40 and specifically address alternatives that would protect residents outside of the proposed annexation area but within the district boundaries from loss of service protection. Streets: Lind Avenue D. Lind Avenue Street improvements ($180,000): The Committee Street Improvements recommended that funds be transferred to allow the street improvements described by staff for Lind Avenue bridge. Approval will result in efficiencies and avoid future disruptions to traffic and business patterns. Budget: 1988 Adjustments E. Other budget adjustments: The Committee recommended approval of the following adjustments as submitted by the administration: 1. $210,000 to fund a consultant study related to valley storm drainage issues (P-1/P-9 Channels). 2. $9,000 for replacement of a postage machine in the Finance Department. 3. $22,000 for police arbitration costs. 4. $9,400 to fund distribution of the Renton Report to all postal customers in zip code areas 98055, 98056, and 98058. t a Q\' Z For Use By City Clerk's Office Only AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING sxxa c=c s xsassss assassaxxa asss:sxsss=c SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Rvilding & Zoning For Agenda Of June 20, 1988 Meeting Date) Staff Contact R uP cnn, nnn Rric-kcon Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Honey Creek PPUD/23rd Street Access Consent Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Letter from Bob Tomberg Other B. Correspondence from City Attorney 4/7/88 , C. Council Minutes 3/7/88 Approval : D. Council Minutes 12/21/87 Legal Dept. Yes No N/A x E Council Minutes 4/14/86 COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Finance Dept. Yes_ No. N/A x Refer to Planning & Development Committee Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Mr. Tomberg has requested that staff review the issue of NE 23rd Street access to the Honeycreek PUD. Originally, the street was to be used for emergency access and later the applicant agreed to acquire additional right of way to allow for a full width city street. Mr. Tomberg's letter indicates there are differences of opinion between themselves and representation of the nearby neighborhood. Since the matter of the roadway was a condition of approval by council for the PUD we feel the matter is most appropriately handled at council level. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS rne' S ERv RY NOON OR THURSDAY wITH DOCUMENTATION. HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES 5611 119 S. E. SUITE 2 BELLEVUE, WA. 98006 206) 746 - 1181 DON ERICKSON BUILDING AND ZONING 200 MILL AVE SO RENTON, WA 98055 RE: 23rd STREET ACCESS DEAR DON: THIS LETTER IS TO REQUEST YOUR ASSISTANCE IN CLARIFYING AN ACCESS PROBLEM TO OUR PROPERTY VIA 23rd STREET. AS YOU ARE AWARE, WE ORIGINALLY PLANNED FOR TWENTY-THIRD STREET TO BE AN EMERGENCY ACCESS TO OUR PROJECT. THIS CONCEPT WAS SUPPORTED BY THE CITY' S STAFF. IN A PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING A MR. MITCH MURRY WAS ADAMANT THAT EMERGENCY ACCESS WAS INADEQUATE ALONG THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY. THE COMMITTEE ASKED IF WE WOULD BE WILLING TO ACQUIRE THE OTHER TWENTY FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY TO APPEASE THE NEIGHBORHOOD' S REPRESENTATIVE (MR. MURRY) . THE COST WAS ESTIMATED TO BE AROUND THREE TO FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS. WE FELT THIS WAS WITHIN THE BUDGET OF OUR PROJECT AND AGREED. AT THIS TIME, MR MURRY IS NOW TRYING TO FIGHT OUR ACQUISITION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY AND HAS SAID HE INTENDS TO OPPOSE OUR ACTIONS THROUGH THE COURTS. BECAUSE OUR AGRREEMENT TO ACQUIRE THE ROAD WAS ONLY INTENDED AS A CONCILIATORY GESTURE AIMED AT NEIGHBOORHOD HARMONY, WE DO NOT FEEL OUR CURRENT COURSE IS APPROPRIATE. WE DO NOT WANT TO HAVE TO DEFEND A LAWSUIT WHICH IS CLEARLY NOT IN OUR BEST INTREST . THEREFORE PT YOUR SUGGESTION, WE CONTACTED MR. GLEN GORDON OF THE FIRE DEPPPTMENT AND RECEIVED RECONFIRMATION OF THE ADEQUACY OF 23rd AS ENE01EAC\ ACCESS. WE WOULD NOW REQUEST 7HAT YOU SET HIS POSITIN 7!Y WRIT!NG AND 2RGAN]ZE A MEE-ING OF THE P_ANNING AND DEVE"O"HENT C]M 17TER T&MESOLVE "HIS CONFLIC-. LiOL- AMBERS ~/ NYC" OT f I'll? V ‘ 41/41eD\\-- 2> 41 . ....... CITY OF RENTON k 'Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney u '^.t-. • Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean - Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell Assistant City Attorneys April 7, 1988 TO: Mayor, ouncil Members FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney t RE:PP up 015-84 Iloney Creek Associates Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: I have before me a letter written by Michael Ilanis on behalf of Mitch Murray. In that letter there is a request that the appeal time be reopened. Apparently Mr. Murray or Mr. Hanis believes that the council decision concerning the road width can be appealed to the council once again. The City Council's decision is not appealable to the council itself, but rather must be appealed to King County Superior Court. The same time limits for appeal to King County Superior Court exist for the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Ordinance, and I do not see that any additional appeal time would be necessary. I also have had an opportunity to review the rather extensive city files, while preparing the Ordinance on the Iloney Creek Associates PPUD. The language in the file concerning prior City Council action establishing the 40 foot right-of-way was consistent with the decision made by the City Council just recently in handling Mr. Murray's request. It would not appear to me that anything has changed. I also wonder why it has taken so long to request the council to take this further step to reopen the appeal time. Mr. Murray originally made that request to the council members and no action was taken on that request. If the council feels that the decision deviates markedly from the prior council decision to Mr. Murray's surprise and detriment, then it would be fair to reopen the appeal time. If this decision is consistent with the council's previous actions, then it would not be appropriate to open the appeal time. However, as previously explained, the appeal is not to the council but to the superior court, and it can be made as part of a challenge to the council's Ordinance on the Preliminary Planned Unit Development. j. awrenee J. % arren Li W:as. AS.22:01. Post Office Box ',__ - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washinctor 980 ; - i,20(), -367!: March 7, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 68 Council President Keolker-Wheeler reported that a special election would cost from $15,000 to $18,000. **Amendment to motion withdrawn. *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL GO ON RECORD AS SUPPORTING EITHER A PUBLIC VOTE BY CITIZENS OF RENTON RELATIVE TO THE FAIRWOOD ANNEXATION AND/OR APPROPRIATION OF MONIES FOR EQUAL SURVEY OF CITIZENS WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD AND/OR A SERIES OF PUBLIC HEARINGS OR PUBLIC MEETINGS FOR INFORMATION OF CITY OF RENTON RESIDENTS. AMENDMENT CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. It was clarified that public meetings will not necessarily be confined to City Hall, and the City will do whatever is necessary to provide information to residents to enable them to make an informed decision about the annexation proposal. AUDIENCE COMMENT Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue NE, Renton, favored the annexation Citizen Comment: Walker process recently used by Kirkland when it doubled its land area and Fairwood Annexation population in approving Washington's largest annexation in 20 years. She North Soos Creek) suggested dividing up large potential annexation areas, selecting representatives from within adjacent City areas to serve on advisory committees, developing an annexation policy, executing interlocal agreement with King County, and considering U.S. Census Enumeration Districts as a guide for setting City boundaries. Councilwoman Mathews clarified that the survey is to assess attitudes of people in proposed annexing areas to establish a maximum boundary to study; and after study and receipt of input from department heads and the community, actual boundaries would be established. Citizen Comment: Violet Anderson (address above) questioned whether large residential areas Anderson - Fairwood and rural areas will be surveyed separately. Mr. Parness emphasized that the Annexation (North Soos survey will be designed to determine results from each separate geographical Creek) area, and results from a very general and brief survey will not be used by City staff to form annexation boundaries, but rather to determine level of interest. Upon inquiry, he advised that survey questions will be neutral and phrased in a manner to identify areas of resistance or support. Citizen Comment: IleIlene Tom Ilellene, 18233 14Ist Avenue SE, Renton, explained that the potential Fairwood Annexation annexation area is being expanded to determine appropriate service areas and North Soos Creek) impose an element of control. He agreed that public hearings or meetings should be held to educate residents, and noted that meetings will be held with Lake Desire residents this week. Citizen Comment: Vaupel Versie Vaupel, P.O. Box 755, Renton, indicated disappointment that only Fairwood Annexation public meetings would be held with residents, and questioned why citizens of North Soos Creek) Renton are paying for the survey. It was clarified that all options are available--public meetings, public hearings and surveys--and by state law, a public hearing must be held by the City Council prior to accepting an exation. Advancement Requested Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, requested advancement to Old Business, Transportation Committee Report, regarding Honey Creek PUD. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS. CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Committee the recommendation of the Public Works Department to require a 28-foot PUD: Preiiq jparv. honey street section face-of-curb to face-of-curb with a five-foot sidewalk placed creek. PPUD-015-84, on the south side of NE 23rd Street for the Honey Creek Preliminary PUD. A minimum 20 feet of right-of-way will be required on the south plus additional footage for slope easements, if determined necessary. Displaying a map of the Honey Creek PUD, Mr. Murray described proposed access to the site via Jefferson to Harrington, both 60 feet wide roadways, and via 23rd Street, which is proposed to be widened from 20 to 40 or 60 feet. Ile requested that the matter of site access via Devil's Elbow Road instead of 23rd Street be referred back to the Transportation Committee for further review, and cited the City's 1987 geotechnical study which estimated that the roadway could be stabilized for a cost of $92,000, and reopened for traffic access to the east and access to the sewer pump station serving the Highlands. Referencing recent Cedar River dredging project, Mr. Murray suggested that gravel removed from that site could be transferred to Devil's Elbow, thereby saving the City approximately $30,000 in cost of gravel to A March 7, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 69 stabilize the road. He also suggested that instead of improving NE 23rd Street, which he estimated to cost $200,000, the developer contribute funds towards restoring Devil's Elbow Road. Councilman Hughes recalled that approval of the Honey Creek PUD was conditioned upon improvement of NE 23rd Street. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. (See later comments.) PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published, and LID: 334, NE 44th Street mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Clymer opened the and Lake Washington public hearing to consider the preliminary assessment roll in the total amount Boulevard of $1,823,943.75 for Local Improvement District No. 334, NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard utility and roadway improvements. Total assessed valuation of property included in the LID is $9,191,000. Correspondence was read from Public Works Director Richard Houghton reporting that as of 5:00 p.m. on 3/7/88 no protests to the LID were received. Correspondence protesting the LID was received after 5:00 p.m.on 3/7/88 from Roger Urbaniak, Managing Partner of Garden of Eden Joint Venture, Bellmond Realty, Inc., 919 124th Avenue NE, Suite 104, Bellevue, representing owners of Parcels #11, #12, and #13; Norman McCue, May Creek Associates, owner of Parcel #4 (Renton Short Plat 052-86); and from members of Kao Ming-Tsong family, owners of Parcel #9. Mr. Houghton indicated that owners of Parcel #9 have signed restrictive covenants agreeing to participate in the LID, and a deferral of off-site improvements, required as a condition of approval of the short plat, has been granted by the Board of Public Works for Parcel #4. He reported that including Parcel #9, the total percentage of protest is 28.76%. Without Parcel #9, protests represent 16.15% of the total ownership. Restrictive covenants have also been executed by owners of Parcels #1, #6, and #10. Parcels #1, #7, and #8 are outside the City limits. Audience comment was invited. Ralph Evans, 3306 NE llth Place, Renton, questioned current zoning classification and location of the southern boundary of Parcel #10. Mr. Houghton advised that B-1, business, zoning exists on the site, and he provided Mr. Evans with a legal description of the parcel. Mike Wensman, 10900 NE 8th Street, Bellevue, owner and developer of Lot 3, questioned increase of proposed LID assessment from $250,000 in August, 1987, to current assessment of $355,000. Mr. Houghton attributed the increase to addition of $400,000 to the total LID estimate to cover engineering, administrative, interim financing and bonding costs. Norman McCue, P.O. Box 622, Kirkland, indicated concern with increased assessment for Parcel #4 from $81,266 to $181,996 since October, 1986. Noting that a sewer trunk line terminates at the property line, he questioned inclusion of $48,441 for sewer connector as well as assessment for traffic signal at N. 44th Street on-ramp. Roger Urbaniak, 4112 78th SE, Mercer Island, representing owners of Parcels 11, #12, and #13, indicated that properties were purchased by three families 15 years ago for retirement purposes, and rezone of the sites is currently being sought. He questioned whether the LID includes development of Lincoln Avenue for the purpose of diverting storm drainage, and reported that he was not contacted to sign the LID petition. It was clarified that notices were sent to all LID participants 30 days prior to the date of public hearing. Michael Dietch, 4126 187th SE, Issaquah, representing Parcel #2, questioned increased assessment from $8,750 to $39,516. Mr. Houghton reported that because the parcel was developed and all off-site improvements were installed, including street light, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, no front footage charges were assessed. However, the property owner is being required to participate in cost of storm drainage facilities and traffic signal at the on-ramp for the interchange. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING FOR TWO WEEKS TO MARCH 21, 1988. CARRIED. It was noted that the two week continuation would give participants the opportunity to meet with Public Works Department staff to discuss concerns. December 21. 1987 Renton City Council Minut*., Page 434 Procedure for Filling Council President-Elect Keolker presented a report recommending the Council Vacancy following procedure for filling the Council seat being vacated by Mayor- Elect Earl Clymer. Written and verbal applications will be accepted at a special Committee of the Whole meeting on 01/07/88 at 7:30 p.m. Each candidate will be allowed ten minutes to present their credentials to the Council and respond to questions by Council members. Balloting will be held at the next regular Council meeting on 01/11/88, and will continue at each subsequent Council meeting in January until one candidate receives a majority vote. If no majority is reached within 30 days of the declared vacancy, names of all nominated candidates will be forwarded to the Mayor. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL PRESIDENT-ELECT KEOLKER WITH REGARD TO THE APPOINTMENT TO THE ANTICIPATED CITY COUNCIL VACANCY. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch and Councilmen Ilughes and Clymer attended the meeting REPORT held by King County at Foster High School last week regarding garbage King County: Incineration incinerator siting. Approximately 500 people attended to express concerns Program with the review process, the choice of incineration as a solution prior to studying recycling, and the selection of specific locations. Due to political and public response, the King County Executive has subsequently determined that a non-urban site should be selected for location of an incineration facility and complete environmental review undertaken. PUD: Preliminary, Response from Public Works Director Houghton has been received regarding Honey Creek, NE 23rd and Harrington Avenue NE, proposed access to the Honey Creek PPUD-015-84 PUD. Width of the roadway is 40 feet with 28 feet required from curb to curb in which full improvement of two 14-foot lanes, curb and gutter, street lights, utilities and sidewalks will be provided. The proposed development will generate approximately 1220 trips per day which is under capacity for the roadway. Bellevue The City of Bellevue just completed a very lengthy citizen-council review of the structure of their government. They have concluded that the city manager system works very well for the city; however, they are considering electing a mayor to serve a four-year term instead of appointing a member of council to serve as mayor for a two-year period. Appreciation to Council Mayor Shinpoch indicated that it has been a profound honor to serve with City Council members, including Randall Rockhill, over the past eight years. She thanked Council for their dedication and individuality, and discussed numerous accomplishments which have been achieved. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, questioned whether Council PUD: Preliminary, Honey concurred in Mr. Houghton's memorandum regarding access to the Honey Creek, PPUD-015-84 Creek PUD. Mayor Shinpoch indicated that copies of the letter will be distributed to Council members for their review and response. Traffic Safety Councilman Stredicke questioned letter from Mayor Shinpoch regarding a Commission Traffic Safety Commission. Mayor Shinpoch referenced State law which requires the City to appoint a Traffic Safety Commission consisting of a police department representative, the traffic engineer and the city attorney to review proposed traffic revisions based on volumes, accident rates, and other warrants. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:15 p.m. MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder. Marilyn Petersen 12/21/87 Rental City Council 4/14/86 Page four Audience Comment continued Renton Loop Mike Lazor, 32 SW Victoria Street, Renton, inquired whether a permit is required for him to place a chain link fence across his driveway on Friday and Saturday nights. Mayor Shipoch indicated that she would research the request. Recess MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 9:22 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:32 p.m. ; roll was.called; all Council members were present. AUDIENCE COMMENT Bob Tomberg, 5611 119th SE #2, Bellevue, requested advancement Advancement to to the Planning and Development Committee reportconcerningOldBusinessHoneyCreekAssociatesappeals. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO OLD BUSINESS, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Keolker presented eve opment a report regarding two appeals filed on the Honey Creek Associates ommi ee "" rezone and preliminary planned unit development, located in the oneeyy Creek vicinity of 2200 Jefferson Avenue (Devil ' s Elbow) . Associates R-014-84 The Committee report stated that detailed geotechnical and PPUD-015-84 engineering information must be provided before the final PUD is approved. Also, full street improvements on a 40- foot public right-of-way alignment with NE 23rd Street must be installed to provide access to the development. iThe Committee recommended that both appeals, from Honey Creek Associates, developer, and Mitch Murray, area resident , be denied. The Committee further recommended that the City Council approve the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and approve the requested zoning for the site subject to the following conditions: 1 ) Submission of a final PUD for eventual development of the subject site; 2) Annexation of the site into the City of Renton; 3) Dedication of a full 40-foot wide right-of-way aligned with NE 23rd Street between Harrington Avenue NE and the site, with an engineering report and specifications for full-street improvement as required by City Code; 4) Submission with the final PUD application of a detailed geotechnical analysis prepared by independent engineers selected with approval of both Building & Zoning and Public Works Departments. The report shall include but not be limited to information regarding site stability/slope integrity; preservation of ravine and stream close to their current state; long term erosion potential by the development; geologic hazards including earthquake analysis; site preparation and restoration; and building techniques; 5) Plans for the final PUD shall be more detailed, and provide a description of the usable open space, recreation and building details; 6) The applicant shall provide a slope easement to the ultimate owners of the PUD property to avoid problems of ownership and responsibility if the property is sold. Such an easement would permit the PUD ownership, whether a single entity or a homeowner/condominium association, to do maintenance work on the steep slopes below the proposed PUD. In addition, the applicant shall record covenants running with the land requiring that the slope on the west side of Honey Creek be maintained as closely as is possible in its natural state; 7) The submission of detailed engineering report regarding sewer, water, drainage, roadway engineering, etc. ; 8) The elimination of the connection and entry of NE 21st Street; Later modified c9) The property zoned G-1 shall have no development upon the property without the City being provided with detailed geotechnical information regarding the site and site plan or PUD approval . The applicant shall sign and file a restrictive covenant, running with the land, so stating; 1 • Renton City Council 4/14/86 Page five Planning & Development Committee Report continued Honey Creek 10) This is a conceptual approval of a preliminary planned Associates unit development and does not vest in the applicant or its R-014-84 successor or assigns any development rights on this parcel PPUD-015-84 or property without recommendation by city staff and approval by the Council of the geotechnical studies required above. Chairman Keolker indicated that the Committee had met several times to resolve concerns related to emergency access. She also advised that the 75% Annexation Petition and concurrent rezone hearing for Honey Creek Associates will be held by the Council on May 12, 1986. Referencing Condition No. 9 of the Committee report, Mr. Tomberg agreed that development of the property on the easterly side of the ravine cannot proceed until detailed geotechnical studies and fire and police services are provided. However, to eliminate the need to reapply for a rezone in the future, he requested that those parcels be rezoned to R-1 at this time. He also noted that development cannot proceed until a PUD is reviewed and approved by the Council . MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. Councilman Stredicke supported the applicant's request for R-1 zoning of the property east of the ravine since there will be further opportunity for the City to review plans prior to development. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL AMEND THE MOTION TO CHANGE CONDITION NO. 9 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT TO INDICATE THAT THE AREA EAST OF HONEY CREEK RAVINE BE REZONED TO R-1 , WITH THE REST OF THE SENTENCE REMAINING OPERATIVE.* Speaking against the amendment, Chairman Keolker reminded Council members that the subject proposal was submitted prior to adoption of new PUD ordinance; therefore, is being reviewed under old provisions. If the two parcels east of the ravine are rezoned to R-1 instead of G-1 , a potential higher density on the entire site could be calculated due to density shifts allowed under the PUD process. The stability of the site is in question, access is unresolved, and provision of fire and police protection is yet to be determined. Councilman Stredicke felt these concerns can be resolved during future review. ROLL CALL: 4 AYES: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, STREDICKE. 3 NAYS: MATHEWS, KEOLKER, REED. CARRIED. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED. CARRIED. City Attorney Warren clarified that the intent of the motion is to change the wording of Condition No. 9 to reflect that both of the flat parcels east of the ravine zoned R-1 shall have no development without provision of required studies, but G-1 zoned property would retain the same restrictions as well as zoning constraints which allow only one dwelling unit per 35,000 square feet. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Gentry Claim Claim for damages in the amount of $100,000 filed by Beverley for Damages Jean Gentry, 2819 First Avenue, Seattle, alleging false arrest CL 22-86 while picketing at Mark 'N Pak grocery as part of labor union activities (8/3/85) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Stevens Claim Claim for damages in the amount of S3,157 filed by Shirley for Damages Jean Stevens, 4419 South 188th, Seattle, for automobile CL 21-86 damage and physical injury sustained in collision with Renton Police patrol , alleging inadequate use of warning siren/lights 12/4/85) . Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Building & Personnel Department requested new position, Mechanical Zoning Position Inspector/Combination, for Building & Zoning Department to accommodate increased work load. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Tri-Delt 75% Policy Development Department requested Council set a public Annexation hearing on 5/19/86, to consider the 75% Annexation Petition Petition for the Tri-Delt Annexation, located on the south side of c Yup June 6, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 171 AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 11th Place, Renton, advised that the Environmental Citizen Comment: Evans Review Committee recently issued a Declaration of Environmental Non- Good Shepherd Group Significance for rezone proposals on Shelton Avenue NE and Olympia Home Rezone, R-015-88 Avenue NE, and established a 14-day period for submission of appeals. He noted that the environmental declaration was published in the newspaper and posted on or near the sites as required; however, errors in property description and scope of proposals have caused confusion to residents. In view of 6/10/88 deadline for submission of appeals, Mr. Evans asked that the appeal period be extended or the review process repeated after errors are corrected. Mayor Clymer agreed to review the matter with City Attorney Warren and report back to Mr. Evans prior to expiration of the appeal period. Citizen Comment: Simone Sam Simone, 1121 S. 23rd Street, Renton, requested response to Jeff Lukins' Victoria Hills Phase II question on 5/16/88 regarding date of expiration of Victoria Hills FPUD, FPUI)-042-85 referred to the Administration for review and report back. He indicated concern with inadequacy of information in subsequent response from the Building Director, and was also concerned that the department had approved black asphalt composition tiles for building roofs despite condition in ordinance specifying cedar shingles. Mayor Clymer agreed to research the matter. Citizen Comment: Murray Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, cited noise problems caused by Noise Problems in young people entering and congregating in the Honey Creek annexation area Honey Creek Area to socialize, ignite fireworks, and ride motorcycles. He indicated that access is being gained through a vandalized gate at Jefferson Street and through damaged fencing adjacent to a locked gate across Devil's Elbow Road. Mr. Murray advised that police have been responsive to residents' calls, but since they do not have keys to the gate, access to Devil's Elbow Road is hampered. He asked that the Public Works Department provide keys to the Police Department and repair the two fences. Mayor Clymer agreed to review the matter with staff. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Reeser, CL-31-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $157.83 filed by Sandra Reeser, 14716 180th SE, Renton, for vehicle damage caused by falling rocks from an embankment on the Maple Valley Highway allegedly due to City failure to maintain and protect roadway from hillside erosion (05/01/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Pacific Northwest Claim for damages in the amount of $400.00 filed by Pacific Northwest Bell Bell, CL-29-88 for damage to buried cable allegedly caused by City backhoe (04/21/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Galvin, CL-30-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $286.90 filed by Richard Galvin, 2407 Garden Court N., Renton, for damage to waterline allegedly caused by City failure to maintain copper waterline (02/19/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. PUD: Final, Polygon Hearing Examiner recommended approval of final Planned Unit Development Corporation Phase III for Polygon Corporation Phase III (Sunpointe, CHG International) for 60 Sunpointe, CHG multifamily units on approximately 11 acres located on SW 5th Street, west of International), FPUD- Stevens Avenue SW, File No. FPUD-111-87. Refer to Ways and Means 111-87 Committee. Annexation: Fetterly Policy Development Department requested public meeting be set on 6/20/88 to consider 10% notice of intent petition for the Fetterly Annexation, 3.61 acres located south of Hazen High School in the vicinity of SE 116th Street and 142nd Avenue SE. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Letter was read from Garret M. Upper, Conner Development Company, 846 Utility: Water System 108th NE, Suite 202, Bellevue, requesting the City of Renton to participate in Oversize Agreement for cost of oversizing the water system being installed for the Liberty View plat Liberty View Plat, at Talbot Road South and S. 171st Street. The letter outlined terms of Conner Development agreement to reimburse the developer in phases for those portions of the Company water system needed to meet the City's comprehensive water plan; and agreement for the City to obtain an easement across tax lot 10 prior to 5/1/89 at no cost to Conner Development Company to allow connection of new system to existing water main. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. TO: Richard Houahtor lublic Works Director DATE 5/13/88 • FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SUBJECT: Michael 'Tanis letter attached re Devil's Elbow Road Please furnish the following to the City Clerk's Office: Certification of Posting Legal Description Certification of Valid Petition Map Deed Pro Rata Share of Costs Easement Restrictive Covenants Verify Content XX Records Your office would have these technical documents reauested. Please furnish a copy and wp will forward to Hanis. Interoffice memoes ar- Apan public- records. THANK YOU! Requested by: HANIS & OLSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY. SUITE 203 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 MICHAEL M.HANIS 206)251-9313 GARY O.OLSON JAMES D.CAYCE,ASSOCIATED COUNSEL ANNETTE DELGADO,LEGAL ASSISTANT 1- 60 , /".._-17 May 11, 1988 Y1,4 xjv-/ Maxine E. Motor1,22„04_,(1 Alo Renton City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Devil 's Elbow Road Dear Ms . Motor: Mr. Mitch Murray has asked that I make a public records request of the City of Renton regarding all records of any technical studies , planning, interoffice memos , etc. , regarding the Devil ' s Elbow Road area. This request is intended to include, but not be limited to , soils studies , cost analyses , traffic studies , drawings , and any engineering planning and design work. Mr. Murray wishes to become as informed as possible with regard to the City' s actions with regard to this area. If the cost of copies of such documents would exceed $250. 00 , please advise this office, and we will have Mr . Murray let you know whether to proceed. Thank you for this service. Very truly yours , 6 HANIS & 0 ON v w.- iV C-wfv et- o? --) Michael M. Hanis 14 -&e '- ateqee---, Hfe....„..e_ r mmh: imw cc: Mitch Murray Lawrence J. Warren, City e E u I : I TY CLEPK'S OFFICE O iI L b Q 1V (1,.3 CITY OF RENTON, Rx WASHINGTON I ORDINANCE NO.4153 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REN- TON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF REN- 1 TON (HONEY CREEK REZONE, PHASE III). f WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION c 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordi- nances of the City of Renton," as amend- ed, and the maps and reports adopted in 1 conjunction therewith, the property herein Audrey r3enne r bein first dul sworn on oath states below described has heretofore been g Y i unzoned following its recent annexation that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the into the City of Renton;and WHEREAS the City of Renton initiated a Iproceeding for change of zone classifica- tions of said property.A public hearing was VALLEY DAILY NEWS held thereon on or about April 18, 1988 before the Renton City Council and the City Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Council having determined that the proper- ty should be rezoned to the classification of Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers R-1, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUN- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six CIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH- INGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:SEC months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published TION I:The following described property in in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Sin R-1); the County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal nggleand Zoning DirectoFamilrlis hereby uthld- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for rized and directed to change the maps of King County. the Zoning ordinance, as amended, to evi- dence said rezoning,to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition and not in Said property being located in the vicini- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers ty of N.E. 18th Street (if extended) and duringthe below statedperiod.The annexed notice a Monroe Avenue N.E.(if extended). SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be O r a i n a n c e No . 41 J 3 effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. was published on M,y-6• 19 10937 2nd day ofMay, 1988 E CITY COUNCIL this Maxine E.Motor,City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of May, 1988. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Earl Clymer,Mayor g g g Annrn+ruri nc to fnrnt sum of $ 76 • au . Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of May 19 3 Notary lic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 May 2, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 146 Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending Report Council concur in the recommendation of the Public Works Department to Maple Valley Highway accept the low bid of Bert Robison in the amount of $294,954.52, and Plat of Maplewood 16" recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to Water Main; Water execute said agreement. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY Project W-916 MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4152 An ordinance amending American Public Works Association Standards, 1988 WSDOT/APWA specifications for municipal public works construction, by adopting 1988 Amendment to Standards WSDOT/APWA Amendments to Division One. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4153 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington changing the zoning Rezone: Honey Creek classification of certain properties within the City of Renton (Honey Creek Phase III Rezone, Phase III), property located in the vicinity of N.E. 18th Street if extended, and Monroe Avenue N.E. if extended. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Amendment to Street An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington amending Chapter 11 of Light Standards Title 9 (Public Ways and Properties) of Ordinance No. 1628 entitled code of general ordinances of the City of Renton by amending Section 9-1108 relating to street lighting standards. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Finance: Furniture The Ways and Means Committee recommended transfer of $3,000 to purchase Mayor/Council Reception furniture for Mayor/Council reception area. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Area SECONDED BY HUGHES, COMMITTEE APPROVE TRANSFER OF 3,000 FROM GENERAL FUND UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE TO THE BUDGET FOR PURCHASE OF NEW FURNITURE FOR MAYOR/COUNCIL RECEPTION AREA. CARRIED. Executive Session MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION. CARRIED. Time: 10:35 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all members were present. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 10:45 p.m. lsrvJ MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Pat Briggs 05/02/88 WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MAY 2 , 1988 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Amending American Public Works Association Standards Honey Creek Phase III Rezone to R-1 - 13 . 35 acres located in the vicinity of NE 18th Street (if extended) and Monroe Avenue NE (if extended) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Amendment to Street Lighting Ordinance n Matter o 'rate t- Ri-ngie e-s TRANSFER OF MONIES TO PURCHASE FURNITURE FOR MAYOR'S RECEPTION AREA (Referred 4/25/88) The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of the transfer of $3 , 000 from the General Fund unappropriated balance to purchase new secretarial furniture for the Mayor' s reception area. qt/15;11444 - 4ilrf41)Richard Stredicke, Chair Robe Hughes Nancy Ma-qh ws CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4153 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (HONEY CREEK REZONE, PHASE III) . WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been unzoned following its recent annexation into the City of Renton; and WHEREAS the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classifications of said property. A public hearing was held thereon on or about April 18 , 1988 before the Renton City Council and the City Council having determined that the property should be rezoned to the classification of R-1 , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Single Family Residential (R-1) ; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein Said property being located in the vicinity of N.E. 18th _ Street (if extended) and Monroe Avenue N.E. (if extended) . SECTION II:This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. ORDINANCE NO. 4153 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of May, 1988 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of May, 1988. Earl Clymer, Mayo Approved as to form: 2 C1 Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: May 6, 1988 ORD.. 31: 4/22/88. ORDINANCE NO. 4153 EXHIBIT "A" HONEYCREEK REZONE - Parcel D R-1 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 said point also being the True Point of Beginning; Thence South O1 '16' 12" East along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of s<<id Section 4 to an intersection with the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1490; Thence West along said South line to an intersection with the East line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 3401 a distance of 321. 12 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing City of Renton limits a distance of 430 feet; Thence West and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1246 a distance of 32C .81 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing limits of the City to an intersection with the South line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1622 a distance of 500 feet more or less; Thence East along said City limits a distance of 321 .6 feet more or les'y; Thence North and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence East along said North line to the Northeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 a distance of 322.20 feet and the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 1F.3. 17.AJH:mf 12/11/87 I pig. . . g-in 44 : . •.• t 11 14Z4Nnzezis114.1 1 7. ... 4 4: ill 1:2Z 75.°C 1 e.... I SG/ p44.4104,140. = W ' . / w u7 67I C.I:::. i-;IL L.t 4Aiv ';,, I ORDINANCE N0. 41 3 P% I GREE 1 RR I I 1 1 r .cwiC COAT su mu' 1 1 1 I 4 re M7 I 1 I I s _t En t14 ff1 RflNT•N (ITN LIMIT i1ifin i1 1 f tD fDD 11 it-17)1' 14:1i % 67 Fig LL]] 4P4,1 i KCWNY 10 " DALE • A iv tl"! i i /. SIERRA HOC LIONS *% z x+ ., zoo aq I, ,} I5-"MA° I ,'' ELEMEMTAflY PARK s. r'1 ,, ANIM sIII 1 Ill f v I t * aswQ s . : . , I, R. 1. • rigkiel% etj/ 1 i 11It ri WWIrcII6:1i:! :t a N s Alora111011hoidolEN2e, i.3 =gm illes001112111111oimoa, s. tereitO‘ess ', : 11111111glirMVO11111i1 ' pttia.rt rrmA A s , _ Malt , UM RV Sae4iuiA bi' tIw11111111r' vs ' 2.3z z 3 sA d lm i 61 II Mal CAM' rum morn 1 617. s4 ' Am z i Nn es as ©QO a ..w IMPS MUM I I IJI ! J ariCIWIiQ, MINK Nall ma c4:•: I a m= mil 4...., imin yr a % e01 .. .. co, J, p if... T l BO' II CM Illben MN 1 COM Ala El . .,... , 753.7".."44 , gl i:i: fiii: : afflumemaro, e gain Da.IK.r • ti€ " IILDV S 1 1 i,,o rl r. OUM MI :< a 5 . 1 1 III I IN LI ate'' 11 n yl 1 ;. g'"2-\ 1-'. •, I I. ii 1 I r s j .. ,.. r ._, , JR riIGH al tat.l T ` 1 lGHOOL _t L" I. 1 1wim ai t.- a _'_ram{{I 1 1 i + „ mowt'.. O ifs • s 1 •I w •v •• `o. t ,1YNQ I r 1 L t i • 11 I AI, L\ n ` e 1 •. I 7 _ L w 1 II ERNI ' -41.- . • " " 7401.,L i 32-,,,' 1 ‘. a a. ti o fie+ o,, 4111 1r : " S-_:ii sum, wit womb 7. iI • OS i-----\ 9 g , . ' IRMb2--II • Spim u ; n , , u ; ems s j• oO a R. t I 0 v l__ . PTO v, „\\ S e.; 7 •I 1.r.j.T r At ril 25. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 135 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Finance: Water and Sewer An ordinance was read relating to the waterworks utility of the City, Revenue Bonds including the sewerage system as a part thereof; specifying and adopting a system or plan of additions to and betterments and extensions of the waterworks utility; providing for the isusance of $3,460,000 par value of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, 1988, of the City of the purpose of obtaining a part of the funds iwth which to pay the cost of carrying out that system or plan; fixing the date, form, denominations, maturities, interest rates, terms and covenants of those bonds; creating a special bond redemption account to provide for the payment of the bonds; and providing for the sale and delivery of those bonds to Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation, Seattle, Washington. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Public Works: 1988 An ordinance was read amending American Public Works Association WSDOT/APWA Standards, specifications for municipal public works construction, by Amendment to Standards adopting 1988 WSDOT/APWA Amendments to Division One. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Zoning: Group I, Parcel An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located H-2, NE Park Drive in the 1100 block of NE Park Drive at the intersection of Sunset Boulevard NE from R-3, medium density multifamily, to R-1, single family residential, zone. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Rezone: H_o n _Creek An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Phase III in the vicinity of NE 18th Street (if extended) and Monroe Avenue NE (if extended) to R-1, single family residential, zone; Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone, Phase III. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Vouchers Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 40073-40444 in the amount of 1,700,110.47, having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 40084-40086 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Comprehensive Plan: Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke announced that the proposed North Renton resolution for the study of zoning and Comprehensive Plan in North Renton will be considered by the Committee next Monday. NEW BUSINESS Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring Transportation with the Public Works Department recommendation to award the contract for Committee the Oakesdale Avenue SW street improvements to R. W. Scott Construction CAG: 88-022, Oakesdale Company in the amount of $1,964,197.35 with alternates for cement concrete Avenue SW, SW Grady pavement and tile tunnel walls. It was further recommended that the Mayor Way to SW 16th Street and City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Executive Session MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LITIGATION. CARRIED. Time: 7:45 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Council reconvened into regular session; roll was called; all members were present. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 7:59 p.m. t MAXINE E. MOTOR, CMC, City Clerk 04/25/88 WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 25, 1988 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds Amending Ameridan Public Works Association Standards Honey Creek Phase III Rezone to R-1 - 13 . 35 acres located in the vicinity of NE 18th Street (if extended) and Monroe Avenue NE ( if extended) Group 1, Parcel H-2 , NE Park Drive - City-initiated rezone from R-3 to R-1 APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 40073 through No. 40444 in the amount of $1, 700, 110. 47 ; having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 40084 - 40086 machine voided. r% pW4 Ri and Stredicke, Chair Rob t Hugh Nancy Ma%ews 1406Y GQeK e April 18. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 125 Advancement Requested Randy Corman, 2216 Harrington Place NE, Renton, requested advancement to the matter of condemnation of property for the Honey Creek PUD. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Randal and Catherine L. Corman, address PUD: Preliminary, Honey above, opposing condemnation of 20-foot by 280-foot parcel of their Creek, PPUD-015-84 property for purposes of extending NE 23rd Street as access to the Honey Creek PUD. The letter questioned whether the City's right of eminent domain could be applied in this condemnation since proposed access is designed to provide convenient access into the Honey Creek development and does not benefit the Renton populace as a whole; 2) questioned reimbursement of condemnation costs for both sides by the City or developer if the condemnation fails, and suggested that the developer's funds would be better spent on improving other access including Devil's Elbow Road. Mr. Corman stated that he does not oppose the development, but is against being forced to sell property to a neighbor solely for the neighbor's benefit; and the subject portion of property is vital to maintain property value and preserve 30 50-foot high trees which contribute to privacy and tranquil quality of his back yard. He urged the City Council to abandon the condemnation and require the developer to provide alternative access into the site. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following Committee ordinance for second and final reading: Annexation: Honey An ordinance was read authorizing the acquisition of certain property and Creek, NE 23rd Street property rights by eminent domain providing for the payment thereof; Condemnation authorizing the City Attorney to prepare a petition for condemnation in King County Superior Court and for the prosecution thereof for the acquisition of such property and property rights for roadway purposes; NE 23rd Street; Honey Creek PPUD-015-84. City Attorney Kellogg was asked by Council to clarify Section III of the ordinance which states that compensation for the acquisition shall be from the City's General Fund. Mr. Kellogg explained full responsibility of the developer to compensate the City's General Fund for cost of condemnation proceedings. He also indicated that if Council decides that this is a public use, that the public interest requires the public use, and the property appropriated is necessary for the purpose, the Court will consider that finding and give it great weight. He reviewed recent findings in similar court case in which the Court disagreed; however, he pointed out that the distinction between that case and the City's case is lack of alternative access by the developer of Honey Creek PUD. Upon further Council inquiry regarding whether the developer will pay all City costs of condemnation regardless of outcome, Mr. Kellogg indicated that a contract has not yet been developed for that purpose with the owner of Honey Creek PUD; however, the City is very concerned with this aspect due to significant risk involved. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE CITY ATTORNEY CAN NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT WITH THE APPLICANT FOR RESPONSIBILITY OF COSTS OF CONDEMNATION. CARRIED. Citizen Comment: Murray Mitch Murray, 2813 NE 23rd Place, Renton, felt that condemnation funds NE 23rd Street could be better spent in upgrading surrounding roads such as Devil's Elbow. Condemnation He requested that consideration be given by Council to having the developer also assume costs incurred by Mr. Corman during the proceedings. Citizen Comment: Lawrence Damman, 2809 NE 23rd Place, Renton, pointed out that although Damman - NE 23rd Devil's Elbow Road has proven to be expensive to repair and maintain, the Street Condemnation same problems may exist on NE 23rd Street since terrain is similar. He questioned condemnation of private property to help a developer construct a project, and expressed concern that consideration to the developer is threatening rights of existing City residents. Mr. Damman disputed the contention that improvement of NE 23rd Street would improve traffic circulation in the area, and claimed that the road would be a single feed from a private development to public access, used only by residents of the proposed development. 2216 Harrington Place N.E. Renton, Washington 98056 April 17, 1988 The Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Members of the City Council Robert J. Hughes Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Nancy Mathews CITY !F c ruTQN Toni Nelson8,sesJohnReed Richard Stredicke r Cm'CLEWS OFFICF n Thomas Trimm 1 Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council , As the owners of the 20 ' X 280 ' parcel of property proposed for condemnation to extend Northeast 23rd Street , we wish to redirect the city' s actions such that Renton taxpayers ' funds are not wasted and our rights are not jeopardized. Condemnation of our property is not justified. We request that you review the attached correspondence we have shared with the city attorney on this matter, and we wish to summarize some main points below. Public Use We and the rest of the Renton populace would gain nothing from this condemnation. The related development would of course increase the tax base, but not enough to significantly offset the increased costs of fire and police protection. The condemnation would not be providing improved traffic management, a park, a civic center, senior housing, or anything else to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood or Renton as a whole. Even the connection of Jefferson to Northeast 23rd Street is not designed to meet public need, but instead only to provide convenient access to Messrs. Santa and Tomberg ' s investment property. We doubt that eminent domain can be successfully applied under these circumstances. Legal Costs The public records clearly show that Messrs. Santa and Tomberg have agreed to reimburse the city for the costs of condemning our property. But what about the potentially much higher costs of attempting and failing to condemn it? If condemnation fails , the city will get both parties ' legal bills, and the developer will get nothing . If you elect to proceed with condemnation, you should protect Renton taxpayers by getting an explicit agreement from the developer to pay legal costs even if condemnation fails our costs will be included) . Personally, we hope such an agreement would cause the developers to recalculate the risks of condemnation and pursue a new plan. The developers ' funds could be more fruitfully expended on improvements to the Honey Creek development and surrounding properties including Devil 's Elbow Road. Conclusion As we have repeatedly stated, we are not against development of the Honey Creek Associates property. We are against being forced to sell property to a neighbor solely for the neighbor 's benefit, and fighting for years to get properly compensated for it. The subject portion of our property is vital to preserving the forested, tranquil quality of our backyard, and fair market value will be difficult to ascertain in court. Unfortunately, good faith attempts to negotiate a price have been clouded by the developers ' presumption that they could condemn the property. We feel the council should abandon the pursuit of condemnation, and encourage Honey Creek Associates to pursue negotiations or alternatives. Sincerely, Randal A. Corman 7444.-C.;L 7rle7..J Catherine L. Corman 2216 Harrington P1.N. E . Renton, WA 98056 February 10, 1987 4r. Lawrence Warren O. Box 626 100 S. 2nd Street 2enton, WA 98057 Dear Mr. Warren: Thank you for your promptness in responding to our inquiries and for your diligence in forwarding relevant correspondence to us . Our attorney briefly responded to some items in your January 16 letter, but we thought that you would appreciate a more specific and personal list of concerns. Also, we are accepting your invitation to ask additional questions. This is necessary because we cannot negotiate a price for a portion of our land until we know how our remaining property will be affected. Specific concern areas are as follows: Traffic -- What is the latest estimate of number of car trips per day expected on the proposed extension of N.E. 23 Street? What recourse do we have if the actual traffic exceeds the estimate? We are greatly concerned about vehicles passing so closly to the side of our house and yard. We are especially concerned about our daughter ' s safety and the potential loss of value to our home. Noise -- What is the predicted noise intensity that our home would be subjected to if the proposed road were in place? While we value Mr. Houghton ' s opinion regarding noise, we would feel most comfortable with a quantitative prediction of noise levels (decibles ) at our home. This prediction should consider the steep grade proposed for the road and all modes of traffic expected ( including delivery and garbage trucks ) . We would find it most informative if these calculations were accompanied by measured values of the current noise intensity at our home ( twenty-seven feet -from proposed road) . Again, what recourse will we have if actual impact is more severe L. Warren Page 2 February 10, 1987 than predicted impact? Air Pollution -- We are concerned with the impact on our health as well as the smell of vehicle exhaust. Separation of Neighborhood -- The proposed road would divide our established neighborhood, physically separating our home from a modern and attractive community on N.E. 23rd Place. In addition, our personal relationships with our neighbors may be compromised if our settlement with Honey Creek Associates results in a reduction of their property values . Garbage -- Who would be responsible for keeping the new roadside and sidewalks clean? Change in Character -- Currently, our backyard is tranquil and forest-like. We are concerned that the proposed road will destroy our back yard ' s character. Road Engineering -- We cannot assess the impact of the road on our home ' s value without seeing construction plans. We are concerned with the location of streetlights, sidewalks , and rockeries. Also will there be a fence and landscaping? How will run-off water be controlled? How will the intersection of Harrington P1 . N. E. and N.E. 23rd St. be handled (stop signs, light , uncontrolled)? These are some of our main concerns at this time. We are a bit puzzled , though, by the city' s wanting to buy our land. We do not see how the general public will get any advantage from this road. Only the private developers benefit from the proposed road. In addition, the developers concerned, Messrs. Santa and Tomberg, have not seriously tried to negotiate with us. We have received no written offers from them, and the verbal offer from Mr. Santa was for only zero dollars. We did not consider that a serious offer. We have reviewed the letter that Mr. Hendrickson sent to the city council requesting condemnation of our land (Aug 27, 1986) . The offer refered to in that letter was never extended to us . Furthermore, the dollar amount stated in that letter was grossly undercalculated, even when determined on the per-square-foot basis" that Mr. Hendrickson claimed he was L. Warren Page 3 February 10, 1987 using . We feel that if you truly wish to promote a settlement between Honey Creek Associates and ourselves, you should encourage the developers to asses the true impact of their road on our home ' s value, and make an appropriate offer if they feel they can afford to adequatly compensate us. Sincerely, Randal A. Corman Catherine L.. Corman HANIS & OLSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY.SUITE 203 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 MICHAEL M.HANIS GARY 0 OLSON 206)251-9313 JAMES D.CAYCE,ASSOCIATED COUNSEL ANNETTE DELGADO,LEGAL ASSISTANT January 26, 1987 NEragnEDJAN2B ;;'S7 Mr. Lawrence Warren WARREN tic I`L`LUUts P.O. Box 626 Gy 100 S. 2nd Street Renton, WA 98057 Re: Honey Creek Annexation/Randal Corman and Mitch Murray Dear Mr. Warren: Randal Corman and Mitch Murray have asked me to assist them with their opposition to the Honey Creek Associates Annexation to the City of Renton. I have reviewed the documents that exist to date, have researched the legal issues , and am requesting on their behalf that the City' s contemplated actions be reconsidered. The first issue which I will address is that of condemning Mr. Corman ' s property. I have read your letter of October 6, 1986, indicating that because of the failure of Honey Creek Associates to acquire property of Mr. Corman's, the City will use its condemnation powers to accomplish that for the developer. I have read the Minutes, and they indicate that an agreement was reached between the City and developer for the developer to pay the City' s costs of condemnation. It seems to be the City' s approach that since Mr. Corman was "unreasonable" regarding a price or negotiation with Honey Creek Associates, that provides sufficient basis for the City to use its condemnation powers. We strongly disagree with that. Mr. Corman has no obligation to give Honey Creek Associates the time of day. His property is private, and he has a right to keep it that way. He is under no obligation whatsoever to negotiate with Honey Creek Associates , or to give up his private property to assist them with a portion of a development which he strongly opposes. Having examined the Minutes of the City Council meetings, and the correspondence, it also appears that the City would be unsuccessful in a condemnation case under these circumstances. The case of King County v. Theilman, 59 Wn. 2nd 586 (1982) , is precisely on point to the fact pattern that has arisen between the Mr. Lawrence Warren January 26, 1987 Page Two City and Mr. Corman. There, King County attempted to enter into the same kind of an agreement with a developer for acquisition of a right-of-way. The basis there was that the property owner had been unreasonable in negotiating with the private developer. The property sought was to be dedicated to public use, as it would be here. In all important respects, that case is identical . The court there stated: Though we do not think the County' s participation in taking relator's property by eminent domain is a cloak to cover private objectives , the effect of this action is to allow a private party to do indirectly that which the law prevents him from doing directly. The ultimate effect is to allow a neighboring land developer to take private property for a private use. This action is the County' s in name only. It had no funds budgeted either to acquire relator ' s land or to build the road across it. The record can not support a conclusion that public use and necessity require condemnation of relator' s property; hence, the action of the Board of County Commissioners was sufficiently arbitrary and capricious to "amount to constructive fraud" . Theilman, page 595-6. In the Honey Creek Associates matter, Honey Creek Associates has other access to its property that could be used in lieu of the Corman parcel , and which already has sufficient width of right-of- way. I am referring to the Devil ' s Elbow Road. Honey Creek' s and the City of Renton' s objections to that route is apparently its cost. The cost to a private developer would, however, not constitute an appropriate basis for the City to condemn Mr. Carman ' s land. There is an alternative access that can meet the private developer' s needs . It should be utilized, as recommended by the Hearing Examiner, at least as additional access to the project (Examiner Finding #13) . I would also take issue with the contention of the City that there may be "special benefits" to Mr. Carman 's property. I preliminarily investigated this with appraisers, and they indicate that under the circumstances of this particular piece of property, the road would in fact damage the fair market value of the property, and would provide no special benefits. Without Mr. Lawrence Warren January 26 , 1987 Page Three detailed plans , though, it is not completely possible to determine the severance damage to the remainder of the property. Of course, because the proposed taking is only partial , Mr. Corman is entitled to specific plans and specifications of the use to which his property is to be put. You letter of January 16, 1987, indicates that the City does not have sufficient plans yet to allow proper evaluation of the severance issue. My investigation has also included a discussion of this matter with the King County Boundary Review Board staff. Apparently, Renton has been' required to re-submit its proposal , giving the application a new effective date of filing with the BRB. I understand that the staff of the BRB and the King County Building Department people feel that this annexation is inappropriate because of its failure to include the Devil ' s Elbow area. Without including that area, the boundaries of the annexation are irregular. Again, the City is apparently attempting to avoid the cost of having to upgrade and maintain Devil 's Elbow road. We would submit that the developer in this case should be required to do that, not the City. In any event, my clients will oppose the City ' s annexation as it is presently structured before the CBoundary Review Board, and the courts if necessary. It may well be that the developer would wish to reconsider its plans, and recognize that in the long run it may be a less expensive, and better project if the traffic pattern is completed through the Devil ' s Elbow area, rather than through existing, established residential uses. My clients do not oppose the developer's plan itself. They will cooperate in all respects. Their specific objection is to a major access to that development being through their neighborhood. They have carefully protected the character of their property, and the nature of the neighborhood. I am advised that several other of the residents in the area will participate in opposing the annexation if it includes the use of their dead end street as an access. There are a number of other concerns that Mr. Corman and Mr. Murray raised with me while they were here. They were concerned about the City allowing this developer to -serve its developement with a substandard width road. Apparently, the City has somehow in advance indicated that it would accept a 40-foot right-of-way for this road.' A 40-foot right-of-way is allowed by City ordinance only for one way hillside roadways. My clients are also concerned with the City' s compliance with SEPA. I am aware that the same kinds of questions are being raised at the County and BRB level regarding the City' s Declaration of Non- significance. It would be hoped that however this project Mr. Lawrence Warren January 26, 1987 Page Four proceeds, the City would consider an Environmental Impact Statement. This project is in a unique area of steep slopes and waterways. Much of it apparently will be maintained in its natural state, a recognition that there are environmental concerns which need protection. I have not investigated whether a challenge to the City' s SEPA decisions would be timely. However, we would certainly argue both before the County and the BRB that the SEPA compliance is insufficient to authorize their approval of this annexation. Again, I would urge the City and the developer to reconsider its proposed method of providing road access to this development. My clients feel strongly, and are prepared to undertake whatever effort is necessary to oppose the development and the annexation so long as it has the potential for running an access road across their property and through their neighborhood. Very truly yours, HANIS 6 OLSO Michael M. Hanis MMH:ksf CITY OF RENTON 0 Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber -Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys January 28, 1987 Mr: Michael Hanis Hanis & Olson 3900 East Valley Highway Suite 203 Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Honey Creek Annexation/Randal Corman and Mitch Murray Dear Mr. Hanis: Thank you for your letter of January 26, 1987. I am somewhat puzzled why you chose to direct it to me rather than the City Council. In your letter you ask the City to reconsider certain steps that have been taken in the past. Those steps were taken primarily by the City Council. As you know, I have no power to reconsider an action taken by the City Council. In your letter you make a suggestion that the Devil' s Elbow road would be an adequate access to the Honey Creek property. The Devil' s Elbow road is not adequate access to any place. The road is on a shifting, sliding hillside and is not stable for use. The City has blocked off the road at the point at which it enters the City. The Public Works Department feels that a major capital improvement would be necessary before that road is usable. You question the declaration of non-significance issued in this case. As you know, the declaration now stands as it was not appealed within the statutory period of time. You indicate that your clients will contest this annexation before the Boundary Review Board. That is their right and the City certainly has no objection to them exercising that right. I have found both Mr. Murray and Mr. Corman to be responsible and courteous people. I am sure they will make an effective presentation to the Boundary Review Board. D,.ct llff:ra Rnv (.1/, - 1M C )nri Ctreet - Rentnn Wachinatnn 021167 - r7n61 755-R67R Mr. Michael Hanis Page 2 January 28, 1987 Your letter mentions the fact that plans are not final for the roadway in front of the Corman residence nor is the Boundary Review Board action complete or the annexation final. I believe I have acknowledged all of those points with Mr. Corman and that I am not suggesting that any final acquisition of this property take place before the annexation is finalized. Finally, I have reviewed the case of King County v. Theilman, 59 Wn. 2d. 586 (1962) . Your letter incorrectly states the date as 1982 . The change in dates is significant because of SEPA. I have also reviewed that case and found that the public road was, in fact, nothing but an access road to serve private development. In the case we are discussing, there is already an existing public road that is being widened. I think that distinction is important and therefore believe that the Theilman case is distinguishable. However, if your position is correct and the City may not use its condemnation powers, then I believe that the property owner has a case for a private way of necessity. I will forward copies of your letter and this response to the City Council and Environmental Review Committee (the responsible public official under SEPA) , the Public Works Department and the attorney for Honey Creek Associates . I do not assume the responsibility of insuring that this correspondence is placed on any party's or body' s agenda. Very truly yours, Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor City Council Members Environmental Review Committee Public Works Dept. HANIS & OLSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY.SUITE 203 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 MICHAELM.HANIS 206)251-9313 GARY O.OLSON JAMES D.CAYCE,ASSOCIATED COUNSEL ANNETTE DELGADO,LEGAL ASSISTANT March 5, 1987 Randal and Catherine L. Corman 2216 Harrington P1 . N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Re: Honey Creek Annexation/Randal Corman and Mitch Murray Dear Mr. and Mrs . Corman: I assumed you had received a copy of this letter, but on second thought became concerned that you had not. It is Larry Warren' s response to my letter on your behalf. Larry indicates in the letter that he thinks the Theilman case is not applicable because it is before the adoption of the State Envirnomental Policy Act. SEPA is irrelevant to the issue of condemnation powers , so I 'm not sure what his point is. Additionally, he refers to a "private way of necessity" . A private way of necessity allows only for minimum access. There is no basis in that doctrine for widening an existing access . As a matter of fact, attempts to use that doctrine to gain an access big enough upon which to put a legal road have failed. The courts have uniformly ruled that only a minimum access, usually a driveway, is allowable. Also, that doctrine only applies when land is totally land-locked from any other way out. None of that applies here. In any event, I don ' t see anything in his letter that would indicate a change in the strength of your position. I will not make response to this letter. I have seen your letter to him, and believe you are approaching the matter correctly. However, if you have any questions or wish me to take any further action, please let me know. Very truly yours, HANIS & OLSON Michael M. Hanis MMH:ksf cc: Mitch Murray April 18, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 122 would be incurred by vehicles entering or exiting from high-volume NE 4th Street at the proposed access point; and suggested that instead of vacating the street, a barricade be erected which could be removed for use by emergency vehicles. Discussion held by Council and staff indicated that if the proposal is approved, the vacated property would revert to the abutting owners at a cost to be determined by the City Council; access for the undeveloped commercial/multifamily property to the north would be determined at the time of development; and options other than vacation could be reviewed by the Board of Public Works that would meet the intent of the residents but would not foreclose the option of secondary emergency access. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Upon Council inquiry regarding possible use of the vacated property as a community tot lot to be maintained by the homeowners, City Attorney Kellogg reported that, if vacated, the land would legally revert to the abutting property owners. Noting concern that the proposed vacation would cause one of the abutting lots to be landlocked, Mr. Kellogg expressed doubt that title insurance could be obtained for property not abutting on a public street. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION TO WORK WITH THE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION TO ARRIVE AT AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. Council members expressed concern with vacating the street at this time, and felt a barricade may be a solution which would meet the needs of the neighborhood and still retain the option for future secondary access. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:40 p.m. Council reconvened into regular session at 8:45 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present except Hughes and Nelson, previously excused. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published Annexation: Honey Creek in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Clymer opened the public Phase III Rezone hearing to consider rezone of the Phase III portion of the Honey Creek Annexation to impose R-1, single family residential zoning, on approximately 13.35 acres located in the vicinity of NE 18th Street (if extended) and Monroe Avenue NE (if extended). Phase III was added to the annexation scope in response to a requirement by the King County Boundary Review Board that the City include Devil's Elbow Road right-of-way and the two additional parcels located to the northwest of the road. Annexation of this property was approved by the City Council on 11/25/87. Referring to a vicinity map, Policy Development Director Larry Springer described the subject site which consists of three parcels each containing a mobile home and one parcel which remains undeveloped. Although steep slopes exist to the north, the subject site is relatively flat, and prior to annexation, was zoned SR-7200, a single family designation in King County. Mr. Springer recommended that the City Council reclassify the Phase III property to R-1, single family residential, and refer the matter to Ways and Means Committee for appropriate legislation. Audience comment was invited. Margaret Webb, 14126 150th Place SE, owner of rental properties in the area, asked whether Kirkland Place NE would be used as access to the subject site. Carrie Trimnell, Policy Development Department Assistant Planner, pointed out existing access points on the vicinity map. Mr. Springer indicated the possibility that Kirkland Place NE would be used as access, but he advised that a permanent roadway system will be determined at the time properties are developed. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO IMPOSE R-1 ZONING ON THE PROPERTY AND REFER THIS MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR LEGISLATION. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published Zoning: Group I, Parcel in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Clymer opened the public H-2, NE Park Drive hearing to consider the City-initiated Group I rezone of Parcel H-2 on NE Park Drive from R-3, multifamily residential, to R-1, single family residential, classification. 2216 Harrington Place N.E. 324 Renton, Washington 98056 April 17, 1988 The Honorable Mayor Earl Clymer Members of the City Council Robert J. Hughes Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Nancy Mathews CITY nr P' 'TON Toni Nelson John Reed 1/ R rules Richard Stredicke n nI ;r CL,P1('S OFFICF ', 1 Thomas Trimm u1 Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council , As the owners of the 20' X 280' parcel of property proposed for condemnation to extend Northeast 23rd Street , we wish to redirect the city's actions such that Renton taxpayers ' funds are not wasted and our rights are not jeopardized. Condemnation of our property is not justified. We request that you review the attached correspondence we have shared with the city attorney on this matter, and we wish to summarize some main points below. Public Use We and the rest of the Renton populace would gain nothing from this condemnation. The related development would of course increase the tax base, but not enough to significantly offset the increased costs of fire and police protection. The condemnation would not be providing improved traffic management, a park, a civic center, senior housing, or anything else to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood or Renton as a whole. Even the connection of Jefferson to Northeast 23rd Street is not designed to meet public need, but instead only to provide convenient access to Messrs. Santa and Tomberg 's investment property. We doubt that eminent domain can be successfully applied under these circumstances. Legal Costs The public records clearly show that Messrs. Santa and Tomberg have agreed to reimburse the city for the costs of condemning our property. But what about the potentially much higher costs of attempting and failing to condemn it? If condemnation fails, the city will get both parties ' legal bills, and the developer will get nothing. If you elect to proceed with condemnation, you should protect Renton taxpayers by getting an explicit agreement from the developer to pay legal costs even if condemnation fails our costs will be included) . Personally, we hope such an agreement would cause the developers to recalculate the risks of condemnation and pursue a new plan. The developers ' funds could be more fruitfully expended on improvements to the Honey Creek development and surrounding properties including Devil 's Elbow Road. Conclusion As we have repeatedly stated, we are not against development of the Honey Creek Associates property. We are against being forced to sell property to a neighbor solely for the neighbor 's benefit, and fighting for years to get properly compensated for it. The subject portion of our property is vital to preserving the forested, tranquil quality of our backyard, and fair market value will be difficult to ascertain in court. Unfortunately, good faith attempts to negotiate a price have been clouded by the developers ' presumption that they could condemn the property. We feel the council should abandon the pursuit of condemnation, and encourage Honey Creek Associates to pursue negotiations or alternatives. Sincerely, Randal A. Corman Catherine L. Corman 2216 Harrington P1 .N.E . Renton, WA 98056 February 10, 1987 Mr. Lawrence Warren P.O. Box 626 100 S. 2nd Street Renton, WA 98057 Dear Mr. Warren: Thank you for your promptness in responding to our inquiries and for your diligence in forwarding relevant correspondence to us. Our attorney briefly responded to some items in your January 16 letter, but we thought that you would appreciate a more specific and personal list of concerns. Also, we are accepting your invitation to ask additional questions. This is necessary because we cannot negotiate a price for a portion of our land until we know how our remaining property will be affected. Specific concern areas are as follows: Traffic -- What is the latest estimate of number of car trips per day expected on the proposed extension of N.E. 23 Street? What recourse do we have if the actual traffic exceeds the estimate? We are greatly concerned about vehicles passing so closly to the side of our house and yard. We are especially concerned about our daughter's safety and the potential loss of value to our home. Noise -- What is the predicted noise intensity that our home would be subjected to if the proposed road were in place? Wzile we value Mr. Houghton ' s opinion regarding noise, we would feel most comfortable with a quantitative prediction of noise levels (decibles ) at our home. This prediction should consider the steep grade proposed for the road and all modes of traffic expected ( including delivery and garbage trucks ) . We would find it most informative if these calculations were accompanied by measured values of the current noise intensity at our home ( twenty-seven feet- from proposed road) . Again, what recourse will we have if actual impact is more severe L. Warren Page 2 February 10, 1987 than predicted impact? Air Pollution -- We are concerned with the impact on our realth as well as the smell of vehicle exhaust. Separation of Neighborhood -- The proposed road would divide our established neighborhood, physically separating our come from a modern and attractive community on N.E. 23rd Place. In addition, our personal relationships with our neighbors may be compromised if our settlement with Honey Creek Associates results in a reduction of their property values . Garbage -- Who would be responsible for keeping the new roadside and sidewalks clean? Change in Character -- Currently, our backyard is tranquil and forest-like. We are concerned that the proposed road will destroy our back yard 's character. Road Engineering -- We cannot assess the impact of the road on our home 's value without seeing construction plans. We are concerned with the location of streetlights, sidewalks , and rockeries. Also will there be a fence and landscaping? How will run-off water be controlled? How will the intersection of Harrington P1 . N.E. and N.E. 23rd St. be handled (stop signs , light, uncontrolled)? These are some of our main concerns at this time. We are a bit puzzled , though, by the city's wanting to buy our land. We do not see how the general public will get any advantage from this road. Only the private developers benefit from the proposed road. In addition, the developers concerned, Messrs. Santa and Tomberg, have not seriously tried to negotiate with us. We have received no written offers from them, and the verbal offer from Mr. Santa was for only zero dollars. We did not consider that a serious offer. We have reviewed the letter that Mr. Hendrickson sent to the city council requesting condemnation of our land (Aug 27, 1986) . The offer refered to in that letter was never extended to us . Furthermore, the dollar amount stated in that letter was grossly undercalculated, even when determined on the per-square-foot basis" that Mr. Hendrickson claimed he was L. Warren PE ge 3 FEbruary 10, 1987 using. We feel that if you truly wish to promote a settlement between Honey Creek Associates and ourselves, you should encourage the developers to asses the true impact of their rcad on our home ' s value, and make an appropriate offer if they feel they can afford to adequatly compensate us. Sincerely, C6"— Randal A. Cor an 4,..„:144.1e4.4 Catherine L.. Corman HANIS & OLSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY.SUITE 203 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 MICHAEL M.HANI GARYO OLSON 206)251.93I3 JAMES D.CAYCE.ASSOCIATED COUNSEL ANNETTE DELGADO.LEGAL ASSISTANT January 26, 1987 RE217.A.frignJAN252E7 Mr.. Lawrence Warren WARRENI fr ilJt Cs P.O. Box 626 Cy 100 S. 2nd Street Renton, WA 98057 Re: Honey Creek Annexation/Randal Corman and Mitch Murray Dear: Mr. Warren: Ran.ial Corman and Mitch Murray have asked me to assist them with their opposition to the Honey Creek Associates Annexation to the City of Renton. I have reviewed the documents that exist to date, have researched the legal issues , and am requesting on their behalf that the City' s contemplated actions be reconsidered. The first issue which I will address is that of condemning Mr. Corman ' s property. I have read your letter of October 6 , 1986, ind _cating that because of the failure of Honey Creek Associates to acquire property of Mr. Corman ' s , the City will use its condemnation powers to accomplish that for the developer. I have read the Minutes , and they indicate that an agreement was reached between the City and developer for the developer to pay the City ' s cos.:s of condemnation. It seems to be the City' s approach that since Mr. Corman was "unreasonable" regarding a price or negotiation with Honey Creek Associates, that provides sufficient basis for the City to use its condemnation powers. We strongly disagree with that. Mr . Corman has no obligation to give Honey Creek Associates the time of day. His property is private, and he has a right to keep it tha:;: way. He is under no obligation whatsoever to negotiate with Honey Creek Associates , or to give up his private property to assist them with a portion of a development which he strongly opposes. Hav:i_ng examined the Minutes of the City Council meetings, and the correspondence, it also appears that the City would be unsuccessful in a condemnation case under these circumstances. _ The case of King County v. Theilman, 59 Wn. 2nd 586 (1982) , is precisely on point to the fact pattern that has arisen between the Mr. Lawrence Warren January 26, 1987 Pagf: Two City and Mr. Corman. There, King County attempted to enter into the same kind of an agreement with a developer for acquisition of a rigl:t-of-way. The basis there was that the property owner had beer unreasonable in negotiating with the private developer. The property sought was to be dedicated to public use, as it would be here . In all important respects, that case is identical . The court there stated: Though we do not think the County' s participation in taking relator's property by eminent domain is a cloak to cover private objectives, the effect of this action is to allow a private party to do indirectly that which the law prevents him from doing directly. The ultimate effect is to allow a neighboring land developer to take private property for a private use. This action is the County' s in name only. It had no funds budgeted either to acquire relator ' s land or to build the road across it. The record can not support a conclusion that public use and necessity require condemnation of relator ' s property; hence, the action of the Board of County Commissioners was sufficiently arbitrary and capricious to "amount to constructive fraud" . Theilman, page 595-6. In the Honey Creek Associates matter, Honey Creek Associates has other access to its property that could be used in lieu of the Corman parcel , and which already has sufficient width of right-of- way. I am referring to the Devil ' s Elbow Road. Honey Creek ' s and • the of Renton' s objections to that route is apparently its cost. The cost to a private developer would, however, not constitute an appropriate basis for the City to condemn Mr. Corman ' s land. There is an alternative access that can meet the private developer' s needs . It should be utilized, as recommended by the Hearing Examiner, at least as additional access to the project (Examiner Finding #13) . I would also take issue with the contention of the City that there may be "special benefits" to Mr. Corman 's property. I preliminarily investigated this with appraisers, and they indicate that under the circumstances of this particular piece of property, the road would in fact damage the fair market value of the property, and would provide no special benefits. Without Mr . Lawrence Warren January 26, 1987 Page Three detailed plans , though, it is not completely possible to determine the severance damage to the remainder of the property. Of course, because the proposed taking is only partial , Mr. Corman is entitled to specific plans and specifications of the use to which his pr Dperty is to be put. You letter of January 16, 1987, indicates that the City does not have sufficient plans yet to allow proper evaluation of the severance issue. My investigation has also included a discussion of this matter with the. King County Boundary Review Board staff. Apparently, Renton has been' required to re-submit its proposal , giving the application a new effective date of filing with the BRB. I understand that the staff of the BRB and the King County Building Department people feel that this annexation is inappropriate because of its failure to include the Devil ' s Elbow area. Without including that area , the boundaries of the annexation are irregular. Again, the City is apparently attempting to avoid the ccst of having to upgrade and maintain Devil ' s Elbow road. We wculd submit that the developer in this case should be required to do that, not the City. In any event, my clients will oppose the City ' s annexation as it is presently structured before the Boundary Review Board, and the courts if necessary. It may well be that the developer would wish to reconsider its plans, and rEcognize that in the long run it may be a less expensive, and bEtter project if the traffic pattern is completed through the Devil ' s Elbow area, rather than through existing, established rEsidential uses. My clients do not oppose the developer's plan itself. They will cooperate in all respects. Their specific objection is to a major access to that development being through their neighborhood. They have carefully protected the character of their property, and the nature of the neighborhood. I am advised that several other of the residents in the area will participate in opposing the •- annexation if it includes the use of their dead end street as an access. There are a number of other concerns that Mr. Corman and Mr. Murray raised with me while they were here. They were concerned about the C.:.ty allowing this developer to-serve its developement with a substandard width road. Apparently, the City has somehow in advance indicated that it would accept a 40-foot right-of-way for t:nis road. ' A 40-foot right-of-way is allowed by City ordinance only for one way hillside roadways. Mi clients are also concerned with the City ' s compliance with SEPA. I am aware that the same kinds of questions are being raised at the County and BRB level regarding the City' s Declaration of Non- significance. It would be hoped that however this project Mr. Lawrence Warren January 26, 1987 Page Four proceeds , the City would consider an Environmental Impact Statement. This project is in a unique area of steep slopes and waterways . Much of it apparently will be maintained in its nataral state, a recognition that there are environmental concerns whi:;h need protection. I have not investigated whether a challenge to the City' s SEPA decisions would be timely. However, we would certainly argue both before the County and the BRB that the SEPA compliance is insufficient to authorize their approval of this annexation. Again, I would urge the City and the developer to reconsider its proposed method of providing road access to this development. My clients feel strongly, and are prepared to undertake whatever effDrt is necessary to oppose the development and the annexation so long as it has the potential for running an access road across their property and through their neighborhood. Very truly yours, HANIS & OLSO Michael M. Hanis MMF: :ksf o CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney melt Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry Assistant City Attorneys January 28, 1987 Mr: Michael Hanis lianis & Olson 3900 East Valley Highway Suite 203 ltenton, Washington 98055 Re : Honey Creek Annexation/Randal Corman and Mitch Murray Dear Mr. Hanis: Thank you for your letter of January 26, 1987. I am somewhat puzzled why you chose to direct it to me rather than the City Council. In your letter you ask the City to reconsider certain steps that have been taken in the past. Those steps were taken primarily by the City Council. As you know, I have no power to reconsider an action taken by the City Council. I:i your letter you make a suggestion that the Devil' s Elbow read would be an adequate access to the Honey Creek property. Tile Devil' s Elbow road is not adequate access to any place. The road is on a shifting, sliding hillside and is not stable for use . The City has blocked off the road at the point at which it enters the City. The Public Works Department feels that a major capital improvement would be necessary before that road is usable. Ycu question the declaration of non-significance issued in this case. As you know, the declaration now stands as it was not aEpealed within the statutory period of time . Ycu indicate that your clients will contest this annexation before the Boundary Review Board. That is their right and the City certainly has no objection to them exercising that right. I have found both Mr. Murray and Mr. Corman to be responsible and courteous people. I am sure they will make an effective presentation to the Boundary Review Board. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton. Washineton 98057 - (206) 255-8678 Mr. Michael Hanis Page 2 January 28, 1987 Your letter mentions the fact that plans are not final for the roadway in front of the Corman residence nor is the Boundary Review Board action complete or the annexation final. I believe I have acknowledged all of those points with Mr. Corman and that I am not suggesting that any final acquisition of this property take place before the annexation is finalized. inally, I have reviewed the case of King County v. Theilman, 59 Wn. 2d. 586 (1962) . Your letter incorrectly states the date gas 1982 . The change in dates is significant because of SEPA. have also reviewed that case and found that the public road was, in fact, nothing but an access road to serve private development. In the case we are discussing, there is already an existing public road that is being widened. I think that distinction is important and therefore believe that the Theilman case is distinguishable. However, if your position is correct and the City may not use its condemnation powers, then I believe t.zat the property owner has a case for a private way of necessity. I will forward copies of your letter and this response to the City C uncil and Environmental Review Committee (the responsible public ot-ficial under SEPA) , the Public Works Department and the attorney for Honey Creek Associates . I do not assume the responsibility of insuring that this correspondence is placed on any party's or body' s agenda. Very truly yours, Lawrence J. Warren L74:n d cc : Mayor City Council Members Environmental Review Committee Public Works Dept. HANIS &OLSON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3900 EAST VALLEY HWY.SUITE 203 RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 MICHAEL M.HANIS 206)251-9313 GARY O.OLSON JAMES D.CAYCE.ASSOCIATED COUNSEL ANNETTE DELGADO.LEGAL ASSISTANT March 5, 1987 Randal and Catherine L. Corman 2216 Harrington P1 . N.E. Renton, WA 98056 Re: Honey Creek Annexation/Randal Corman and Mitch Murray Dear Mr. and Mrs. Corman: I assumed you had received a copy of this letter, but on second thought became concerned that you had not. It is Larry Warren' s response to my letter on your behalf. Larry indicates in the letter that he thinks the Theilman case is not applicable because it is before the adoption of the State Envirnomental Policy Act. SEPA is irrelevant to the issue of condemnation powers, so I 'm not sure what his point is. Additionally, he refers to a "private way of necessity" . A private way of necessity allows only for minimum access. There is no basis in that doctrine for widening an existing access . As a matter of fact, attempts-to use that doctrine to gain an access big enough upon which to put a legal road have failed. The courts have uniformly ruled that only a minimum access, usually a driveway, is allowable. Also, that doctrine only applies when land is totally land-locked from any other way out. None of that applies here. In any event, I don' t see anything in his letter that would indicate a change in the strength of your position. I will not make response to this letter. I have seen your letter to him, and believe you are approaching the matter correctly. However, if you have any questions or wish me to take any further action, please let me know. Very truly yours, HANIS & OLSON Michael M. Hanis MMH:ksf cc: Mitch Murray CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4153 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (HONEY CREEK REZONE, PHASE III) . WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Orcinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, " as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been unzoned following its recent annexation into the City of Renton; and WHEREAS the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classifications of said property. A public hearing was held thereon on or about April 18 , 1988 before the Renton City Council and the City Council having determined that the property should be rezoned to the classification of R-1, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Single Family Residential (R-1) ; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein Said property being located in the vicinity of N.E. 18th Street (if extended) and Monroe Avenue N.E. (if extended) . SECTION II :This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval , and five days after publication. ORDINANCE NO. 4153 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of May, 1988 . Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of May, 1988. Earl Clymer, May1° Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: May 6, 1988 ORD. 31:4/22/88 . ORDINANCE NO. 4153 EXHIBIT "A" HONEYCREEK REZONE — Parcel D R-1 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 said point also being the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 01 '16' 12" East along the East line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to an intersection with the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1490; Thence West along said South line to an intersection with the East line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 3401 a distance of 320.12 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing City of Renton limits a distance of 430 feet; Thence West and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1246 a distance of 320.81 feet more or less; Thence North along said existing limits of the City to an intersection with the South line of that parcel of land as annexed under Ordinance No. 1622 a distance of 500 feet more or less; Thence East along said City limits a distance of 321 .6 feet more or less; Thence North and continuing along said City limits to an intersection with the North line of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence East along said North line to the Northeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 4 a distance of 322.20 feet and the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 1 1F.3.17.AJH:mf 12/11/87 t, w 104;581,04 n to y: Ga6d Tim' 111 I na ga r He14215/' -ET VW z 3 .• I • r• I II 31 sub Set pletallit04111400 =V •..' 16. _ I« • K7 , •71 • C. D. 1--iIL L.MAN.1 '_:, I ORDINANCE NO. 41 3 j , Zr7! -FIV& 1 X •GREE ;J4RKs. r saa 1 C.tr IC. COAST R- I II T rro 1 M7 I 1 1 i GZ 360 I Np I 11471- ar 17f 117 4405 404 1 1 0`. :2 t a• [t1 2tp ima•IL,RENT. .i CITY LIMIT i , it11111 41 11 I I1rI1 L)7 Ldl 1 l011110\ 4 1 p WM I aK- 44iviM r// SIERRA HE11ALEtxzz5zos 4 I 14-, I• lD'F 1 ,' / ELEMEIIrALIOM5 PARK S';" Minn EVu.' I / / I rortam' lINFIIIIR . : . , ,. » ' ..;,V tM erg, 40 .. gm ,•, . .• -rnssietilra.. --,......,-„,—............ i, ]No ll am eia 'IC DLL sri r+e+,•. i F. z anal'a 1"‘ till O, I' HIRE CAM' EMI .211111141'12 ESQ I 0 tl _ de t, rue Ott . . v w r r i 1' tirinmy% • Pi OJT' . . 4 4 iii Mill En UM ! ME all CP I a- 00 26a 4,0 S 4 Ls 4* g ed. NI I 1 ' III VIlii 1 E user 201 22H 2 ink :. j ' -4 ; nig.— 11 SCHOOL _T in e dr —`\ • r ; 1 r i. zao z 'tf•1 _sit I I4t O 1Ia; 0,4 am. MIIle! ;II L I 1 l .r (i . 1 IIIIPii , .1.- 7". . I i,mew A.. /.... ',dOoPPiffpiill li 1 1. mu d. IOO ,. 1 . ZONING SUMMARY HONEY CREEK ANNEXATION and REZONE - pha III Public Hearing - April 18, 1988 LOCATION The area encompassed by the Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone - phase III consists of approximately 13.35 acres located in the vicinity of NE 18th Street (if extended) and Monroe Avenue NE (if extended) (see Figure 1). SUMMARY The subject site consists of four parcels, all of which are privately owned. One of the parcels is undeveloped, and a total of three mobiles homes are located on the remaining three parcels. The site is relatively flat; Honey Creek and the steep slopes surrounding the ravine are located to the north of the subject site. Prior to annexation, the subject site was zoned SR-7200 in King County. This is a single-family residential zone which requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The Renton City Council accepted the original Honey Creek Annexation on May 12, 1986. Public hearings were held on the imposition of zoning on the properties encompassed by the original annexation and rezone application on December 31, 1985 and May 12, 1986, and the City Council recently approved the required zoning ordinance. The King County Boundary Review Board invoked jurisdiction on the annexation and subsequently required the City to modify the annexation boundaries in order to include the Devil's Elbow Road right-of-way and the two additional parcels of land located to the northwest of the road. The Renton City Council approved the addition of these properties on October 19, 1987 and imposition of G-1 zoning was approved by the Council on March 21, 1988. The annexation became effective on November 25, 1987. Since the property encompassed by the phase III rezone is currently within the City limits, only one public hearing is required to consider the imposition of zoning. RECOMMENDATION The Policy Development Department recommends that Council impose R-1 Single- Family Residential zoning on the property encompassed by the Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone - phase III. This zone will correspond to the previous King County SR- 7200 zone. If Council concurs in this recommendation, the Policy Development Department further recommends that Council authorize the preparation of an ordinance rezoning this property. ct:dsk3a:hc5 11. - t . i E --. , M r sl 1 : ice - I • 1 >< T r M VAIN. L• Y, . ,! amecamemmosms onimmraircmaii 1 - 1 E operwrigeit fif• L.• E• f s f tif. M V 4h N p r!.!= ill Nil! « M°°° ® oovd` p' ilirdi N g i ' ' s im 0` eili .` I ofriria° - - Tr; IN laihdli SSoliAilvessiedu 1- 1' fl-/, 0 . dGtri o CIO* ` ' i,` orZliB2rWI/ L r ii,„.. 13.. Re 0. 41130,,....... ais ; ap- imiel",___% Its...:( 0011, 7.40.,.. 440. ugliiiilii.dumni!.. ,-; _.,,,,,: i: ic---'rs• Ill 5 S 0, . • n-- 4Cloria seep . , ,.,, 6 iihi 4: 16 i . It) ND Z • ilb" 44 I -- 0 c, A F i- t. i. i. lisgincir# 11113111111: t. 5i 1, 3 ' 4s_ r i, , o gaNiti% g oite: of,.- a12. a l ii ratlivilfirmai6ef44.% I . 1 a- Vic[ r a, -- -, 1 • Q ei 1. Trf.: 40•_‘, . ji_.. wasall i _ . a lois All. 003, - al IRO- law. 1 . 3 gig are. i til In gt\ Ili do o l. . iii © do 9 ,is t. la3 Ycl Y... .....,. I • 1. • •.. . . an 1 w o' i rEgp 0 p se C CITY OF RENTON mil ` FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 13 , 1988 Mr . Stanley Huseland 11107 Wood Ct . 4 Carmel , Indiana 46032 RE: Honey Creek Rezone - Phase II Ordinance No . 4144 Dear Mr . Huseland : The referenced rezone was finalized by the Renton City Council on April 4 , 1988 , by adoption of Ordinance No . 4144 . A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your files . If we can be of further assistance in this matter , please feel free to call . Yours truly , CITY OF RENTON / 7 Maxine E . Motor , CMC City Clerk Enclosure cc : Building & Zoning Department Hearing Examiner Policy Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 13 , 1988 Mr . Amos Huseland 1916 Edmonds Avenue N. E . Renton, Washington 98056 RE : Honey Creek Rezone - Phase II Ordinance No . 4144 Dear Mr . Huseland : The referenced rezone was finalized by the Renton City Council on April 4 , 1988 . by adoption of Ordinance No . 4144 . A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your files . If we can be of further assistance in this matter , please feel free to call . Yours truly , CITY OF RENTON Maxine E . Motor , CMC City Clerk Enclosure cc : Building & Zoning Department Hearing Examiner Policy Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 i CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk April 13 , 1988 King County Parks Planning and Resources Dept . 811 Alaska Building Seattle, Washington 98104 RE : Honey Creek Rezone - Phase II Ordinance No . 4144 Dear Sir or Madam: The referenced rezone was finalized by the Renton City Council on April 4 , 1988 , by adoption of Ordinance No . 4144 . A copy of the ordinance is enclosed for your files . If we can be of further assistance in this matter , please feel free to call . Yours truly , CITY OF RENTON Maxine E . Motor , CMC City Clerk Enclosure cc : Building & Zoning Department Hearing Examiner Policy Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 H° - e-kk. Public Notice P ace CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.4144 An ordinance of the City of Renton, Washington`changing the zoning classifica- tion of certain properties within the City of Renton(Honey Creek Rezone—Phase II). Whereas under Chapter 7, Title IV Building ktQgulations) of Ordinance no. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordi- nances of the City of Renton," as amend- ed, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION and the maps and reports adoptedin conjunction therewith, the property herein- below described has heretofore been unzoned fallowing its recent annexation AudreyBenner into the City of Renton;and being first duly sworn on oath states Whereas the City of Renton initiated a that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the proceeding for change of zone classifica- tions of saitf`•property.A public hearing was held thereon on or about March 21, 1988 before the Renton City Council and the City VALLEY DAILY NEWS Council having determined that the proper- ty should b6;rezoned to the classification of Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition G-1,now therefore The City j;ouncil of the City of Renton, Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Washingtort.do ordain as follows: Stion I: Thero are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six erty n the City of Rentonowins herebyedrezo ed months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published to General.,classification District (G-1); the in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized 'and directed to change the County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amend- , newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ed,to evidence said rezoning,to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and King County.made a part hereof as if fully set forth ' herein Said to The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition northwestpertofpDevil'seingEbowcatRod (120th Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition and not in Place S.E.)) supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Section its: This age, Ordinance shall andbe ffec- tive upon passage, approval thirty during the below stated period.The annexed notice a days after publication. Passed by the City Council this 4th day urdivance 13o. 4144 ofApril,1988. April 8 1988 R2 894 Maxine E.Motor was published on City Clerk Approved by the Mayor this 4th day of April, 1988. Earl Clymer The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Mayor g g g Approved as to form: 102 . 4U Lawrence J.Warren sum of $ City Attorney Acct.#50640 HONEY CREEK REZONE PHASE II G-1 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington,described as follows: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13 t n day of Ap ri 1 1988 Commencang at the Southwest corner of the East Vi of the Northwest 1/4 said Sec- tion 4; Thence Northerly along the Westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 which is also the existing City Limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1796 to the—South line of the North 1132 Not Public for the State of Washington, feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 and the Tree Pnint of Reninninn• residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11186 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4144 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (HONEY CREEK REZONE - PHASE II ) . WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton," as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been unzoned following its recent annexation into the City of Renton; and WHEREAS the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classifications of said property. A public hearing was held thereon on or about March 21, 1988 before the Renton City Council and the City Council having determined that the property should be rezoned to the classification of G-1 , NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to General Classification District (G- 1 ) ; the Building and Zoning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended , to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein Said property being located to the northwest of Devil ' s Elbow Road ( 120th Place S.E. ) 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4144 SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and thirty days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 4th day of April, 1988. Maxine E. Motor , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 4th day of April, 1988. Earl Clymer , ayor Approved as to form: 44#1"C444-0. Lawrence J. Wa n, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 8 , 1988 ORD. 20:3/23/88 . 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4144 HONEY CREEK REZONE PHASE II G-1 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 said Section 4; Thence Northerly along the Westerly line of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 which is also the existing City Limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1796 to the South line of the North 1132 feet of the East 2 of the Northwest 1/4 and the True Point of Beginning; Thence Easterly along said South line of the North 1132 feet a distance of 185.29 feet to the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of said Northwest 1/4; Thence North along said East line of West 185.29 feet of said East 1/2 of said Northwest 1/4 to the South Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. and also known as Devils Elbow) ; Thence Southeasterly along said right-of-way line to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northwest with a radius of 80.00 feet; and a center which bears North 38'15'25" East; Thence Easterly and Northerly along said curve an arc distance of 213.84 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly right-of-way line of said 120th Place Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet and a center which bears North 65'06'50" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly right-of-way margin an arc distance of 72.3 feet to the point of reverse curve, said curve being concave to the southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; Thence Northwesterly along said curve and said Easterly right-of-way margin to a point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 feet; Thence North 49'23'20" West along said Easterly right-of-way margin a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 60.0 feet and a center which bears North 40'36'40" East; Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE•ORDINANCE NO. 4144 Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly right-of-way margin to al intersection with the West line of the East 1111.28 feet of the Northeast 1 '4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence Northerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats, Page 93, records of King County, Washington; Thence continuing North along said West line of said plat to an intersection with the South line of the North 30.0 feet of said Northwest 1/4; Thence West along said South line to an intersection with the Westerly Right-of-Way Line of said S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. ); Thence Northerly along said Westerly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the North line of said Northwest 1/4; Thence West along said North line to an intersection with the West line of the East 1/2 of said Northwest 1/4 which is also the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1796; Thence Southerly along said West line and said existing City Limits to the South line of the North 1132 feet of the East 1/2 of said Northwest 1/4 and the true Point of Beginning. Page 2 of 2 E.3.08:mf 11/6/87 i .,•.• •:1 ;. - ":, L---6; ) 1n.••. d FlicHpuf ar241..goi 1 : , ,r 31 J- 12. -eot%1V- fk.413.)e It. V it ,.as a.et GORDINANCE NO. 4144 A : a« • a.7 e7I D. i-IL.L N1,A '.;''_ • I. ti I i G13ii. ; ARC Os'. P. L:i V. I 1 I Ijta F ...•,i _ Balk IG COA51 7ee a!I 11 '1 1 a7D Y7 1 1• 1 - - -. II. S62 fae N uo\ 7 1 t we tt1 to .- 4L QEtJT.lJ T' LIMIT I• • 1 r lI w 1: arm% ill 1 C'441 t At" 03 ', I I t HEIGHDALEzV. z 25 • zos .. ¢ i // ELEME1fTARY 5 PARK Iv I i / ry 1 A L , . 1514714,610: .Iv it III I, 0ila. I I. N / lt=e t i IFItit j, wart . 1 1111u'6_I_ , '+ ail ll . J • , 11 .•i II I , i roi, 11Iw Iwl I II I. . I I. . Ij. 11 m I Oil y I I . 2. o , Z45 4 Z Z 5 EMI i 7_ , y } 0 • a.1 • 1g I 7• n n r tri 4 1.1.1. . Itinm- Iiii,,, fa- ' ' 40... I am= . 177.177: 1 s f,, Ern.. 7; ME I •. •.‘4, 1111E.7. •<4 1111 MI MIN L', EV IL CCLLEMENT= x Q(/ N I 1 Ill Mil mid r. . KK' ' an oA• ea y 4 VI fr' MI a I gliaY et 0•• •.• .;• NORTH •19 1,4. i.. y. 11 t u i ry r „r 4 Ili D` HIGH!.OD _ 1 s a la: z.e n• `ri L4 I%-1JI • . e " a Da+K • I it^,4 •q.t4c.. 1 • ' t1 1 r : t... ! WO s CIA11QaoamsQaII. e 11 r.. i el NM el a © e• a i 1 , r' r 9 2A4 2 Kir r •• ' NcKNIr l4a Q ,e OQ I x^Q` t 1 3C.14 ' 011111 Es na_la di, 1— es .. .4.. . ' %, 'I I 25-0 2Z0 - it ,C' ,• I C © © eY Q I I 1 2 4. . 1 ,. . I 1 1 t r \ n itAr/ n I 4-- iii.- is. . i --' i 7 rlrr " = j 1 III 1 mow w Nc-- Z^ iT j I IK0 45 WI1 .J 0', 1 IZFAI. 1111177x Se z• gpj ay I2,2_ j---- MI a seas eJ s ; t 741 z ,ems a w a Q; cip I OU I Mao 1` ' m- 3 • e boas ,' . I CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4143 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PPUD- 015-84 - HONEY CREEK ASSOCIATES) WHEREAS a petition for the approval of a preliminary planned unit development for a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located in the City of Renton, has been filed with the Building and Zoning Department; and WHEREAS a preliminary planned unit development has been approved by the City Council following an appeal from the recommendation for approval from the Hearing Examiner after public hearing thereon as provided by law, and WHEREAS it was necessary to annex this property to the City of Renton before approving this planned unit development, and said annexation having been accomplished , and WHEREAS the applicant for this preliminary planned unit development has voluntarily agreed to the time limits for submittal of the final plan for the planned unit development pursuant to City Code Section 4-2711. 6.A of the City Code predicated on the fact that the time taken by the City to condemn a portion of N.E. 23rd Street will not apply to this time limit. Upon acquisition by the City of that parcel the two year "clock" will resume and the two year time limit will be cumulative, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4143 SECTION I : The preliminary planned unit development pertaining to the following described property is approved : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein) Said property located in the vicinity of the 2200 Block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow) SECTION II: The land uses of the preliminary planned unit 3evelopment are low density single family residential dwellings , R-1 and R-2 low to medium density multi-family residential dwellings , uses which will result in a maximum of 72 units within this planned unit development. SECTION III: The effective date of the preliminary planned unit development approval is the effective date of this Ordinance, being thirty days after publication. The date of expiration of the appeal shall be pursuant to Section 4-2711. 6.A which will be two years from the date of approval , subject to a one year extension if requested from and approved by the Hearing Examiner . SECTION IV: The time taken by the City to condemn a portion of N.E. 23rd Street will not apply to the time limit. Upon acquisition of that parcel the two year "clock" will resume and the two year time limit will be cumulative. SECTION V: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and thirty days after publication. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4143 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 4th day of April, 1988. Maxine E. Motor , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYO .this 4th day of April, 1988. Earl Clymer , ayor Approved as to form: 4,1"Ave‘4.4.4, 4 . 14.44---.-eri,-- Lawrence J. Warr 5, City Attorney CITY15: 2/26/88 Date of Publication: April 8, 1988 3 EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. 4143 HONEY CREEK PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0'47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83'06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 83'06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence North 48'06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence North 0'53'33" East a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence Sou'th '88'15' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 34'58'05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence South 1 '06'22" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Pcint of Beginning. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.H. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 , of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; lhence North 0'53'38" East a dlst.ifire of 630.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; lhence continuing North 0'53 '38" East a distance of 538.25 feet; lhence South 46'06'22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; lhence South 11'06 ' 22" East a distance of 105.,00 feet; lhence North 88'15'15" 'lest a distance of 110.00 feet; lhence South 0'53'38" :st a distance of 437. 58 feet; lhence South 48'06'22" East a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence South 83'06 '22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; lhence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet ; Thence North 83'19'25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; lhence North 0'53'38" East a distance of 630.00 feet ; lhence North 80'19 '25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point Of Desinning. Li-v.004m. [ ., „ .., , . h...,,j. 1 . 1 p` 1 v a itM Qi u 1 1 T r rCOvrelif" A 4, 1 / I MI 1 LI 42101E 1 i lined • •, rk Q ! . , 11 v 1 oo' I4Ad I QI M1NOM ;'• . t Q oCea " i pu; 10 0H title u ist 313 • IiN ' cozisma4 i 2. tic„, d© i _ OA a OIRM, Mi. UMQd.m „, no I. of lilt 111 a ggi samia imp! iii- iiimmiimiiiiiiiiiiii::::.1 ......, of la poi Ov MUf, rim1 a ;ems a a aid t /!1 v p•d. I, 'A %pita TA, iiiii `. 1, 41putjffilingtisicvkinkur • 1 /' irk 3.1u11. 311117• 1.i7 eeeemEee ' • pp.:o. 0%'/ /'r's 44s4° 1 % i!g ©i11t • s • 1lirentil Q it ., ' w v ` 1; till, k i i , wowala..-., 11W11 AinN©irra tat I, qt fJC 1 °M ors C LW• rt I I i I t i I AV03 ' 31117W 1 MI sS Ms C strime J 0 2i d 4771AllIrrISP"ea 114 4 VT ON 30NvNIIQ2i0 CIOGIGI 7-1 . f..1.3..! ..1 VLAI.1 pi 1-1, %.. ... la • A HO44 19i it fct tt 1, April 4. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 107 Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Mathews presented a report Development Committee regarding the Ray Brown request for deferral of improvements for short plat, Policy: Bonds and File No. Sh. Pl. 002-86. The Planning and Development Committee met Deferrals (Ray Brown, twice on this topic. City ordinance permits deferral of certain on and off- Sh. Pl. 002-86) site improvements for single family short plats. The subject short plat is multifamily (R-2), located on Monroe Avenue NE. However, because of topography and distance to certain utilities, circumstances are unique and the Committee found that it would constitute a hardship for the owner to install the improvements 400 feet beyond the subject property to connect to the storm sewer or to bond for those improvements at this time. There are no current development plans for this property. The Committee recommended that because of the unique circumstances, the subject short plat be permitted a deferral of improvements as outlined in City Code Section 9-1108.21.H for R-1 property. In all other aspects, the property shall comply to the underlying R-2 zoning. Because of the unique circumstances, this decision should not be considered precedential for any other multifamily parcels. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. CAG: 87-049, Sunset Referencing request on 3/21/88 for status report on NE Sunset Boulevard Boulevard NE Phase II project, Councilman Stredicke indicated receipt of progress report from Public Works Director Houghton stating that street lighting and fencing atop rockery will be completed by this date, with fine grading and pouring of curbs and gutters projected for next week. The project is now 48% complete. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: Ordinance #4143 An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development in PUD: Preliminary, Honey the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and generally south and Creek, PP UD . 15-84 southeast of Devil's Elbow for Honey Creek Associates, PPUD-015-84. It was clarified that the southwest corner of the annexed property is zoned R-1 and R-2. Density for the PPUD is based on that corner and those two areas of designation, and does not include greenbelt or R-1 designation to the east or north. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4144 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Annexation: Holm_ to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE) to G-1, General, Creek, Phase II, and classification; Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II. MOVED BY STREDICKE, Rezone SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL. ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4145 An ordinance was read ordering the construction and installation of roadways LID: 334, NE 44th Street of three, four and five lane configurations, to consist of curbs, gutters, and Lake Washington sidewalks, storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water mains, paving, street Boulevard lighting, signalization, channelization, undergrounding of power, telephone and cable TV, downstream drainage, cleaning of retention ponds, ditching, excavation, and construction of embankments and other necessary improvements and appurtenances in the vicinity in and near NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard with Resolution No. 2704 of the City Council of the City of Renton, establishing Local Improvement District No. 334, and the approximate cost thereof; providing assessments upon property in said district; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement warrants, bonds or notes or other financing means as provided by law and establishing a special fund (LID #334). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: KEOLKER-WHEELER, HUGHES, NELSON, MATHEWS, TRIMM, STREDICKE. 1 NAY: REED. CARRIED. Ordinance #4146 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of propertylocatedRezone: Dalpay, at 715 Sunset Boulevard NE from single family residential district (R-1) to R-072-87 medium density multifamily district (R-3) for James Dalpay, R-072-87. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT APRIL 4, 1988 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading: Honey Creek Associates PPUD D-015-84 - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance Honey Creek Phase II Rezone - 8 . 73 acres located to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE) Ordinance Ordering Construction of LID #334 Dalpay Rezone (R-072-87) R-1 to R-3 - located at 715 Sunset Blvd. The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading and further requests suspension of the rules advancing it to second and final reading: Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Summary Ordinance The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading: Ordinance Amending Ordinance #4014 Authorization to Proceed with Friendly Condemnation on the Bitney Property The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolution for reading and adoption: Adopting Well Field Monitoring Study as a Factual Document Richard Stredicke, Chair Robert Hughd Nancy Mathews RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting March 28, 1988 Municipal Building Monday, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Earl Clymer led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF KATHY KEOLKER WHEELER, Council President; RICHARD M. COUNCIL MEMBERS STREDICKE, THOMAS W. TRIMM, JOHN W. REED, NANCY L. MATHEWS, TONI NELSON, ROBERT J. HUGHES CITY STAFF IN EARL CLYMER, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; ATTENDANCE MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk; LT. DENNIS GERBER, Police Department PRESS Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News Imbert Matthee, Seattle South Times Bureau APPROVAL OF MOVED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL COUNCIL MINUTES APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF MARCH 21, 1988, AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Claim: Miles, CL-18-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $2,165.52 filed by Darlene Miles, 12737 SE 279th Court, Kent, for vehicle damage allegedly caused by debris from broken watermain near Valley Medical Center (1/21/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Bonomi, CL-15-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $60.00 filed by John Bonomi, 17517 Issaquah-Hobart Road, Issaquah, for replacement of shoes allegedly stolen from locker at Mother's Park (8/87-9/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Green, CL-16-88 Claim for damages in the amount of $37.29 filed by Etheline Green, 8067 S. 118th, Seattle, for tire damage when vehicle struck median on N. 3rd near Arco mini-mart and RVTI, allegedly due to improper location of cement curb (3/14/88). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Judson, CL-17-88 Claim for damages in an undetermined amount filed by James Judson, 24826 145th Lane SE, Kent, for injury from golf ball at Maplewood Golf Course allegedly caused by failure of City to provide adequate space and barriers between fairways (9/7/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. CAG: 88-021, Mt. Olivet City Clerk reported bid opening 3/17/88 for Mt. Olivet Pump Station and Pump Station and Highlands Pump Station Rehabilitation; 8 bids received; Engineer's estimate: Highlands Pump Station 183,000. Refer to Utilities Committee. (See Utilities Committee report on Rehabilitation page 96 for bid award.) Annexation: Honey Policy Development Department requested public hearing be set for 4/18/88 Creek, Phase III Rezone to consider Honey Creek Phase III rezone of 13.35 acres located in the Honey Creek annexation. Council concur. Annexation: Martin Policy Development Department requested public meeting be set for 4/18/88 Luther King Jr. Memorial to consider the 10% Notice of Intent Petition for Martin Luther King Jr. Baptist Church Memorial Baptist Church Annexation of 4.72 acres located in the vicinity of SE 116th Street and 138th Avenue SE. Council concur. Streets: Weight Limit Public Works Department requested adoption of legislation to restrict weight limit on City streets during rush hours prior to commencement of major construction on I-405. Refer to Transportation Committee. Utility: Water Districts 63 Public Works Department requested review of service boundary agreement and 14 Boundary proposed by Skyway Water Utility Coordinating Committee with Water Agreement, SWUCC Districts No. 63 and 14 to establish long-range utility boundaries prior to merger. Refer to Utilities Committee. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI St: SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 3/28/88 Dept/Div/Board.. Policy Development Staff Contact.. Carrie Trimnell AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Honey Creek Rezone Phase III Public Hearing..XX Correspondence.. Ordinance Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: New Business.... Study Session... A: Letter Other B: Map RECOMMENDED ACTION: I APPROVALS: I Legal Dept Schedule a public hearing for April 18, 1988. I Finance Dept.... 1 Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Policy Development Department requests that the City Council hold a public hearing to consider the imposition of R-1 single family residential zoning on 13.35 acres of property included in the Honey Creek Annexation. The Policy Development Department requests that this hearing be scheduled for April 18, 1988. 5 0 CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor March 28, 1988 The Honorable Earl Clymer, Mayor Members of the Renton City Council Renton, Washington 98055 Subject: Honey Creek Rezone Phase III Dear Mayor and Council Members: As as result of an inquiry by the Council ' s Ways and Means Committee, it has become apparent that the necessary rezone hearing has yet to be held on approximately 13 . 35 acres of property included in the Honey Creek Annexation (please refer to the attached map) . Therefore, the Policy Development Department requests that the City Council schedule a public hearing for April 18, 1988 to consider the imposition of R-1 Single-Family Residential zoning on this property. Sinc ely, Larry Springer Policy Development Director ct:dsk3a:hc4 Attachment 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 I 1. ., 1 ! li../ . 1 l: i ' ll cw. ni- tr4- e4fi1i I - I I IIR1\\ W . 4. 1' t- MI- 1` l '' t ai t i I' 1 7pyeft MU agar• rIS‘! F? 4 ! ep t owes ; : Eliorfel a 1 aCC E11111005; 11. 1b' 1 NAB! r 1 a= 41. oaa NAB! cc sc 4 G1 r 4tE IIIIIa MI EMI! La DO• a v6, 1 1! a i;' teE7 E(```," + b e a ca call: r O _ nr ,., 0 d Da n r. b6©© E1' r,.. s,. uexpel° 5-,, a .. p rd O44 Cog a 4„, 4 U iui41, v:. Nvr. r In ° tttr. timmik. M1'. lira& t . 4 g cs >...._ i ir li 11 hikefignI4411111, 4 4 . 7matick- zgew adtits' Fi° 1 !' 2" n' a11111 ''[ .''''' ctotta • 4 - 46111 • ik f i I I 111 r e 1..."°" 19-'4111r pa cos r p w 1 . ffincit _ t- 43 i' - pict : to a C., I a An hi& 4t - I 8 cc calm 2' Irti ' - ' ----- iir, 41V. 4 '' A s.), .. 0• 4ti 2 2 !...,", aws svAltiltP,. i* Or "- 4 4 t ' E 1_ ,__ a irtir y ot' 8w w w . l l3 i_ a0 0i. gams J • lop_ oo 000 - minL lel RN R 1iii4uihsigEra o° Q I"' 2` ie to fist,, ,' i a. gag w 4 13120S111- 111)- 711Wil I ! IC ), t 1,- If IL. L !! 1 Is a ' Or;. r. rn', aLN • I u ';.• ' 11J ` a rt ' pa11. N g Iniiiiiat 1 earn" 7. w B ir4i e;. nt JQ Y Ls h ol•- illiVint 1 _ II , ik„ 1 ii % v kh jtv' N S 1. o 1iB T ,- 1 0 r--- as m. SAW ttreA- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY REAudreyBennerNOTICEfSOERTONIEBYTYCOUNCILNLthatthebeingfirstdulyswornonoathstates that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Renton City Council has fixed the 18th day of April, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Build- VALLEY DAILY NEWS ing, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Wash- ington, as the time and place for a public Wash- Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition hearing to consider the following: Dailynewspapers six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Himpo CreeknRezone Phase III publishedThe imposition of R-1, Single Family are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Residential, zoning on 13.35 acres of prop- ert months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ationincluded in the Honey Creek Annex- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Any and all interested persons are invit- County..Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ed to be present to voice approval, disap- provalnewspaperorderoftheSuperiorCourtoftheStateofWashingtonfor or opinions on this matter. by p g CITY OF RENTON King County. Maxine E. Motor, CMC, City Clerk Published April 1, 1988 Valley Daily News R5020 Acct.#50640 The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on April 1 , 1988 R5 0 2 0 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 18 . 2 4 Subscribed and sworn to before mexhis 19 t h day of Ap r i 1 19 8 8 / 7 Notar ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 18th day of April , 1988 , at 7 :30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Honey Creek Rezone Phase III The imposition of R-1 , Single Family Residential , zoning on 13 . 35 acres of property included in the Honey Creek Annexation . Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on this matter . CITY OF RENTON Maxine E . Motor , CMC City Clerk Date of Publication : April 1 , 1988 i\TO T ICE RENTON CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 18, 1988 AT 7:30 P. M. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBER i 200 MIL AVENUE SOUTH a e :a era '`d o. wig•• _ _'emnae TO CONSIDER: HONEY CREEK REZONE -1 © etnnmmo mamowiRardicacw., i a *+, . PHASE III Rali`a!©dl"' m : s+,` . rei • iiill I 01.49, '. l ' THE •ITIPOSITION OF R-1, SINGLE 1744. 4.474° ry `n ' FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONING ON o:viol, liMkN. cas! 13. 35 ACRES OF PROPERTY INCLUDED '! a 0 F% IN THE HONEY CREEK ANNEXATION . ing :• ` wr Q o I k, ANY AND ALL PERSONS ARE INVITED po 0 • 0 • t r eo Elf TO BE PRESENT TO VOICE APPROVAL, . ea oal\, v DISAPPROVAL OR OPINIONS ON THIS . mut4 gdi 4. ''`' i'}'' E worm I a10wClb v . MATTER. p s: clon' v41, as .O 01 Ft1‘ 4 L r P . 111l0 • lI mg r.': la.----.1-ee- 7i1s7 e4•—_-•.:'; N 1 o c :ar ct;.. c , . 11.1,a: Ui N Os-. 1 1 =•..l% . . .. U KNY111T l 1 t. iI Tc8 ki' JR tIIG" g j d _., i'- I. ' P T Ai 1 SCM001. .r Minn . . ' 11 J ' 1 6I D•. 8 1i i p,... etim tiii0rf, A. ,, ; 'tips au•• apurn iltallb "FM kpf m to' II: 7 i raine3E1 [1:, complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-2 01 The removal, mutilation, destruction W a r n i n or concealment of this notice is a mis- demeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. I CERTIFICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON) j_ g N .7AVPd e)1 j! W 10 :7 ,.O5/ /.coy/:ry D OEOZ ore#/' "d 7W 1al €a' ( 1f)( 0 8/ - fo 1/ 'DJJ .a i,/'/1"/91O1 yr!r-V 3.N 14 6f paop{,t o/ a : , ;7,'S'/ C p9/ :7 iiv C z$ // r7%1/ it :a7'%1/ an, JAlaof/ 6l0Z/ .27 V 4r .7y .p% ' a0..,ggio6 p ilioa f'.6 G(7ebe /D ea /la 2P 7 ai yed. ,e6l„(.,?,, icie a ? i4n/7 f i;Q.o o 26'/,‘ .. o,%evy //. 0 6 C/7 j - D ao77.Padle,x ..le./ :I4/ , .003, aua zip ar2 XaWr 41,/0 .427 7 li8/ le/ ///d6/ e. ff 0. tqn d March 28. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes • Pane 96 Latecomer Agreement: Public Works Department requested draft ordinance establishing latecomer Procedure agreement procedure. Refer to Utilities Committee. CAG: 86-016, Grady Way Public Works Department submitted CAG-016-86, SW Grady Way Street Project Improvements; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $21,515.12, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $44,885.83 to contractor, Gary Merlino Construction Co., if all required releases are received. Council concur. Streets: Funding for Public Works Department requested budget funding for removal of debris Removal of Debris from City streets and City-owned property to defray increased fees at transfer station. Refer to Utilities Committee. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee recommended acceptance of low bid from Omega CAG: 88-012, Mt. Olivet Contractors in the amount of $110,214.44 for Mt. Olivet and Highlands Pump Pump Station and Station Rehabilitation; and requested authorization for Mayor and City Clerk Highlands Pump Station to execute contract. Council concur. Rehabilitation Transportation Transportation Committee recommended acceptance of low bid from R. W. Committee Scott Construction Co. in the amount of $788,458.84 for SW Sunset Boulevard CAG: 87-074, SW Sunset Roadway Improvements (Rainier Avenue S. to west City limits); and Boulevard Roadway, requested authorization for Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract. Intersection and Council concur. Watermain Improvements MOVED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: PUD: Preliminary, Honey An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development in Creek, PPUD-015-84 the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow for Honey Creek Associates, PPUD-015-84. Seeking further information on the area of the PPUD, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Fire: Underground Tank An ordinance was read amending Title VII (Fire Regulations) of City Code Secondary Containment by adding Chapter 12 establishing the Underground Storage Tank Secondary Ordinance Containment Ordinance. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Annexation: Honey An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Creek, Phase II, and to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE) to G-1, General, Rezone classification; Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. LID: 334, NE 44th Street An ordinance was read ordering the construction and installation of roadways and Lake Washington of three, four and five lane configurations, to consist of curbs, gutters, Boulevard sidewalks, storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water mains, paving, street lighting, signalization, channelization, undergrounding of power, telephone and cable TV, downstream drainage, cleaning of retention ponds, ditching, excavation, and construction of embankments and other necessary improvements and appurtenances in the vicinity in and near NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard with Resolution No. 2704 of the City Council of the City of Renton, establishing Local Improvement District No. 334, and the approximate cost thereof; providing assessments upon property in said district; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement warrants, bonds or notes or other financing means as provided by law and establishing a special fund (LID #334). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 28, 1988 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Honey Creek Associates PPUD (PPUD-015-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance Honey Creek Phase II Rezone - 8.73 acres located to the northwest of Devil ' s Elbow Road ( 120th Place SE) Ordinance Ordering Construction of LID #334 Dalpay Rezone (R-072-87) R-1 to R-3 - located at 715 Sunset Blvd. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS Having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered, the Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 39380 through No. 39718 in the amount of $935, 779.22; Vouchers 39383, 39386 - 39393 machine voided. 97 xi Richard Stredicke, Chairman 2 Rob Hughes Nancy Maiews up 40' 0 CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: March 22, 1988 TO: Nancy Mathews, Councilwoman FROM: Carrie Trimnell, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone King County Park Holdings At the direction of Larry Springer, I have identified the area encompassed by King County's proposed May Creek Park, the properties which are currently owned by the King County Parks Department, and the existing Renton and King County zoning designations applicable to these properties (please refer to the attached map). King County has numerous land holdings in the vicinity of the Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone. In King County, these properties are zoned SE - Suburban Estate, which requires a minimum lot size of 35,000 square feet. The purpose of this zone is to provide areas for single-family dwellings and related uses at rural densities. The County owns properties in the City of Renton which are zoned primarily G-1 General Use. This zone is equivalent to the County's SE zone in both the minimum lot size and the permitted uses. The County also owns properties in Renton zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential. In addition, they intend to acquire a parcel currently zoned R-4 High Density Multi-Family. This property is involved in a City-initiated rezone from R-4 to staff's recommended G-1. King County does not have a Public Use zone similar to Renton's P-1 Public Use zone. In summary, the imposition of G-1 zoning on the Phase II parcel of the Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone is in keeping with both the City and the County's zoning of the properties held by the County for the proposed May Creek Park. I hope this information will be of assistance to you. If you have any questions, or if I can be of additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at x2552. CIT" ,- a,, vt A,T,.,N MAR2219135 n ct:dsk3a:hc6 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 al., 1 1, )/lty _z,._:' 1"."': •Th:. 'it----:' : ,... t 7-724A '" .21.1%/1 .C1 i 1'..': 7-4. re:14.r. '-'•. 1 II Lid fl7t5e1V ) %174114 9. 9 E.... x. c 1J i„ Fkri _ r t•' I• Itt3N31) •4 I QO c.a asae. ..: lca i ' a' l ism)nl ^``. rla\.•!_ Iwo] d'a chn. I.. d f., r $.1. $. ........ It..0, •..a c off' l J ' lei — T' F j-j x w2 1 r .:'T" - -c22 ri:7\' Gt: 2. c7x 2 1 cG2 ` s.Li I Yt 1' . ,-1..-- Q 1'- 4f r,r,I.T.r.. ie ... l. ,.. I_,. 1 l' .-_ R.. _• c• 1 I .• 11L,••-._rtniurlitl c r • I { fGf" 2,2 I c.2 can er- 1- i -` 1 e+'ti l^ -1 ^-—il 114";nZiarvi• ' ` t O -r--^I. lc y J'... T_'_! rz; :o 1 • Itl.. . 1.....• I t,. rrrr r -Irt, I r:r r r l 1 Ir •rlrr A,••••. sir .ors i•' :1.:. .I.1., l,' -..)' :;.!.IZ• r 1 I i•' ' 1. .• 1•'11.•!' . i I. h- fir.te id I j t co] i-t- • tzlr *C2 SMOII • c2 • •J] za7 cct 71: 31V0 1 I1 667 U] ligh •„ T-/^' r: 1::: L`- 1 - l sb2 I- K,7 122:2 Lc2 or] 5t1 r t I 1 II 1]/72 ^ a1. 1 .'_•-.I• sue^`, .. 1 I t'.• I f .0. ...41.Coz oz 2 11 c1z H- L" foc] 071 ,],1. G 1 IS 11 a•t y Et't r .•.a/S•.•.: c•`. s'•". f• aX TM 7 100h o t•' 0 mot/` X/,7 :' :: •" If c 1rO.11/.t1• i A7V1MjH 1 J.0,lc 1r iI 1jlrj 31fGln 1•••••••••.*X*.•.'.•• • " / ••••••••••••••••'•:et '.., r4r i 40 I" d'iiri/14 - •••-•2i...:.:.:.:.:.,:::::::,.:::,:.:.::::„:. af:•::::: v. .- i 1 I . rr+elrr+r.er+lpy,. • li••••••••••••••:'::::::::°......1°.• ............/. L• ) •1 1JCHO 91 tt \•1..' .: .::})}} ri 111C lC • al IC 1.. _' .•., 1 .1;. '•• . 1 1st c/t I t 1/01/2/ 1/ 1"..........::.:::.* OW 01. Z.. , 1 ---=' - mil l I t ,l I ' -I OF p, I t I •. . t • 11 I 11 t'I' Inilr* r : e •. 4' J[.s i I i— .'• —' 1 • . r.d.i-2tt111 ai • 711 0, [ _i____ 4 .• t 1 1 t I I t 1 r I .t_ i71, ,I. •4ir11 L_riILJ I • i 1S -. 1 WM March 21, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Pane 85 Responding to complaints regarding increases in assessments, Mr. Houghton advised that the increases are due to costs of engineering, sales tax, interest on bonds, bond attorney, bond discount, and contingency factor which adds roughly 50% to the overall assessment. He indicated that the estimate takes into account escalation of costs over the next two years during construction of the LID. Referring to restrictive covenants running with the land on Parcels #1, #6, 9, and #10, City Attorney Warren advised that owners of those parcels may not protest the formation of the LID; however, they may protest the amount of their assessment at the finalization of the LID roll. He clarified that all protests heard at this point are in fact protests made to the amount of the assessment, not the formation of the LID. Finally, he cautioned that at the final LID assessment roll, the City may not assess the property more than it is benefited by the improvements, and the benefit is normally measured by the increase in the fair market value of the property due to the improvements. Responding to further Council inquiry, Public Works Director Houghton noted that property owners benefit when the City is responsible for the coordination of engineering, construction, and inspection of the LID, they would not receive a bill for approximately 2-1/2 years, and they would have the option of paying the assessment plus interest over a 10-year period. Mr. Houghton felt that in view of protest percentage, he would recommend against the LID. Upon inquiry, he confirmed that 86% of the property owners had initiated the LID. Upon inquiry regarding the proposed traffic signal at the I-405 ramp at NE 44th Street, Public Works Director Houghton explained that none of the parcels would be required by itself to construct the $100,000 signal. However, as parcels develop, owners would be required to share the cost of the signal, and since no participants exist on the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard north of NE 44th, costs would be shared by the entire area. It was also noted that if this LID is terminated, the City would have to enforce deferrals that are lapsing, improvements would be installed piecemeal, and the signal would not be installed. Upon inquiry, Mr. Houghton indicated that funds could be set aside through the NE 44th traffic mitigation for installation of the signal and widening of the bridge in the future. Responding to Council inquiry, Attorney Warren explained that a deferral is a grant of a privilege and is reviewed yearly by the City, but if necessary, the Board of Public Works could call a deferral at any time and order the improvements. He further noted that NE 44th is an area designated by the City as an traffic mitigation area by the Environmental Review Committee, and if the Hearing Examiner does not have jurisdiction to impose participatory conditions upon development, the Environmental Review Committee certainly does and has in the past. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON LID 334. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL PROCEED WITH LID NO. 334. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, THIS ITEM BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, publishedandAnnexation: Honey mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Clymer openedtheCreek, Phase II, and public hearing to consider the concurrent Honey Creek annexationandRezonerezone, Phase II, for 8.73 acres located to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE). Referring to a vicinity map, Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the subject site and provided background information. He explained that the Boundary Review Board had invoked jurisdiction on the annexation, originally accepted by the City Council on 5/12/86, and added the Devil's Elbow Road right-of-way and the two additional parcels of land located to the northwest of the road. The expanded annexation became effective on 11/25/87, and the subject hearing is being held to impose G-1, general, zoning on this environmentally sensitive area in keeping with surrounding G-1 zoning imposed on Phase Ioftheannexation. March 21. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 86 Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Springer confirmed that King County owns most of the subject property, it is proposed for future park use, and either G-1 or P-1, public, zoning would be appropriate on the site since development potential is limited. Councilwoman Mathews asked for clarification of the area on which calculation of density for the Honey Creek PUD was based, and zoning of King County property. Mr. Springer advised that the Building and Zoning Department would provide a report on the matter. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CLOSE THE HEARING ON THE HONEY CREEK ANNEXATION AND REZONE, PHASE II. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND IMPOSE G-1 ZONING ON THE PROPERTY. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER LEGISLATION. CARRIED. PROCLAMATION Proclamation by Mayor Clymer declared March 20-26, 1988, as National National DeMolay Week DeMolay Week in Renton to honor the 69th Anniversary of the Order of DeMolay, a character-building organization of young men from thirteen to twenty-one years of age; to tender recognition to their millions of Senior DeMolays, in expressing our grateful appreciation for the fine examples set by them in contributing to the welfare of our community by addressing themselves to the building of good character among our youth; therebyaidinginthedevelopmentofleadershipfortomorrow. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE l 1 th Place, Renton, representative of NeighborsforCitizenComment: Evans R-1 Preservation, questioned who would own proposed Good ShepherdgroupGoodShepherdGrouphomesfordevelopmentallydisabledyouthiftheusewasdiscontinuedinthe Homes, Public Hearing future; complained that public hearing/meeting notices are not beingremovedNoticesfromtelephonepolesinatimelymanner; and requested a list of Council members who have visited group homes as invited by representatives of Good Shepherd. Citizen Comment: Jett -Kathleen M. Jett, 583 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton, read letter addressedtoRVTICourtCaseMayorClymerandCouncilregardinglawsuittheCityhadjoinedwith Renton School District, et al. v. Allen Jett, et ux., matter denied by Washington Supreme Court, and requested a statement itemizing the total sum expended by the City of Renton as a result of the City's participation in the lawsuit. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. CAG: 88-009, 1988 City Clerk reported bid opening 3/16/88 for 1988 Rubberized TrackMaterialRubberizedTrackforGradeCrossing; 2 bids; Engineer's estimate: $75,000. RefertoMaterialforGradeTransportationCommittee. Crossing Rezone: Dalpay, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of Dalpay request for rezonefromR-072-87 R-1, single family residential, to R-3, medium density multifamily, for 0.23 acres located at 715 Sunset Boulevard, R-072-87; restrictive covenants as required by Examiner filed with King County on 3/16/88. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Annexation: Maplewood Policy Development Department requested a public hearing be set onAprilGolfCourse, and Rezone 18, 1988, to consider Maplewood Golf Course annexation and concurrent rezone to P-1, public, zone. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Milt Cantellay, 16624-104th SE, Renton, Utility: Cantellay Sewer requesting authorization to connect to City sewer due to septic tank failure, Connection and agreeing to sign restrictive covenants to annex to the City; accompanying letter from King County Public Health Department set deadline of March 29, 1988, to connect to sewer line, if available, or take other action to correct sewage problem. Public Works Director Houghton advised that as a result of excavation on adjacent property, Mr. Cantellay's drainfield was dug up, resultingindischargeofeffluentuponthegroundsurface. King County sanitarian V-. icy r Etcord Dice_off' C J Clem 014-84, PPUv-015-84 Ci o em1 do Mill flue/nu S. ktft 4-o1,, w A 960ss- RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS COMES NOW MICK C. SANTA and BOB TOMERG of Honey Creek Associates and do hereby impose the following Restrictive Covenants : There shall be no development, site plan or planned unit development approval upon the property without the City being provided with geotechnical studies regarding the site and fire and police services are provided . on the property legally described as follows : B & "C" See Exhibit "A"/attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. G This Covenant is a covenant running with the land and is binding upon all successors in interest to the subject CD property. ri fNuA Dated : March f b , 1988. CO ick Santa/ Bob Tomb0;r_q+ :17 40270 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) RSH 1+=t. r_+r i C:.SHSL 4:4:4:1 i+,00 ss 11 COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mick C. Santa and Bob Tomberg signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated : March /G , 1988. d)'---1 Notary Pun 4zZ1cfortheState of Washington My appointment expires: / > ,t' CITY5 : 06/2/26/88 EXHIBIT "A" HONE. REEK REZONE phase I PARCEL A - 2 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 83°06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence North 48°06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance of 437.58 feet; 0 Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 34°58'05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; p Thence South 1 °06'22" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. CD QO Page 1 of 1 1F.H.3.12.AJH:mf 11/13/87 EXHIBIT "B" HONEY CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL C R-1 zoning That portion Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance of 1034.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 57'15' 59" West a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence SOuth 81'42' 58" West a distance of 311. 13 feet; Thence North 32'14 '00" West a distance of 330.00 feet; OThence North 24'14 ' 00" West a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence North 1'16 ' 00" East a distance of 205.00 feet; C, Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 500.00 feet; C) Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 392.70 feet; 00 Or Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 555.64 feet; Thence South 1'15' 59" West a distance of 480.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned Southwest Corner; Thence South 88' 19' 25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance of 114.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence North 9'08' 56" West a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence North 57'15' 59" East a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 1'15' 59" West a distance of 760.00 feet; to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 2 TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North 0'53'38" East a dtstunce of 630.00 feet to the True Point O of Beginning; rThence continuing North 0.53'38" East a distance of 538.25 feet; Thence South 46'06'22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; I" Thence South 11'06' 22" East a distance of 1-05.00 feet; 7 Thence North 88'15' 15" West a distance of 110.00 feet; 00 Thence South 0'53'38" West a distance of 437.58 feet; 01) Thence South 48.06' 22" East a distance of 2.28.60 feet; Thence South 83'06' 22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet ; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; Thence North 0'53' 38" East a distance of 630.00 feet; Thence North 88'19' 25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Page 2 of 2 1F.H. 3.11.AJH:mf 12/11/87 EXHIBIT "C" HONEY CREEK REZC.._ phase I PARCEL B G-1 zonii That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 0 1/4 of said Section 4; 04 Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet to the True Point of Beginning; r"1 Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; C) C) Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet; Gn Thence North 1°06' 22" West a distance of 235.00 feet; Thence North 34°58' 05" West a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence North 88°15 ' 15" West a distance of 170.00 feet; Thence North 11 °06'22" West a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 46°06'22" West a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 185.29 feet to an intersection with the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North along said East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the South Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. and also known as Devils Elbow) ; Thence Southeasterly along said Right-of-Way Line to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northwest with a radius of 80.00 feet, and a center which bears North 38°15'25" East; Thence Easterly and Northerly along said curve an arc distance of 213.84 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of said 120th Place Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet and a center which bears North 65°06'50" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line an arc distance of 72.3 feet to the point of reverse curve, said curve being concave to the Southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; Thence Northwesterly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to a point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 feet; Page 1 of 2 Thence North 49°23'20" West along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 60.0 feet and a center which bears North 40°36'40" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the West Line of the East 1111 .28 feet of the Northeast 0 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence Northerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the 4 Plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats, Page 93, records r4 of King County, Washington; r7 Cj Thence South 88°15'36" East a distance of 55.60 feet; 1010 OF) South 1 °16'00" West a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 24°14'00" East a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence South 32°14'00" East a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 81 °42'58" East a distance of 311 . 13 feet; Thence North 57°15'59" East a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 1°15'59" West a distance of 160.00 feet; Thence South 57°15'59" West a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 9°08'56" East a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15'59" West a distance of 114.74 feet; Thence North 88°19'25" West a distance of 448.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1F.3.21 .AJH:mf 01/18/88 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st day AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION of March, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. (REVISED) in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place Audrey Benner being first duly sworn on oath states for a public hearing to consider the follow- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the IngHoney Creek Rezone, Phase II, for the imposition of G-1, General zoning on 8.73 acres of property added to the Honey VALLEY DAILY NEWS Creek Annexation as required by King County Boundary Review Board. This Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition includes the area known locally as "Devil's Elbow.' Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers Any and all interested persons are invit- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ed to be present to voice approval, disap- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published • prowl or opinions on same. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King CITY OF RENTON County,Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal Maxine Motor g PP g City Clerk newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 6, King County. 1988.Valley Daily News. R5001 The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on March h , 19.8_8 R5 0 01 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 24 . 32 Subscribed and sworn to before me thisl 6 th day ofM a r ch 19 88 Not ry Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Rev,sed 11,86 Fr CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st day of March, 1988 , at 7 :30 p.m. (REVISED) in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II , for the imposition of G-1 , General zoning on 8 . 73 acres of property added to the Honey Creek Annexation as required by King County Boundary Review Board . This includes the area known locally as "Devil 's Elbow. " Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same . CITY OF RENTON Maxine E . Motor City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 6, 1988 Acct . #50640 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st day of March 19 88 , at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II, for the imposition of G-1, General zoning on 8.73 acres of property added to the Honey Creek Annexation as required by King County Boundary Review Board. This includes the area known locally as "Devil's Elbow." Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON t ce/ Maxine E. Motor City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 2, 1988 NOTICE RENTON CITY COUNCIL t PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 21, 1988 AT 7: 30 P. M. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 4-24.&'1 ..nt.... f - r a.N TO CONSIDER HONEY CREEK i. _ .; ., REZONE, PHASE I I , FOR THE 1 . 1lLh;; :;. IMPOSITION OF G-1, GENERA' r1-Ica,-rt-8co I ZONING ON 8, 73 ACRES OF GE- i• ARK- „• Du L.,,t PROPERTY ADDED TO THE n co,,r R I ~" Is' I' - HONEY CREEK ANNEXATION AS n a I. I Hf 47 b.REQUIRED BY KING COUNTY E. ,i,. , ,r IIWT.N CITY L,•...T3 r. BOUNDARY REVIEWBOARD71v a`NJ . '"t Itt= I Ai t ; ?__ THIS INCLUDES THE AREA M. ,,; ,,, : : , I L~--=a KNOWN LOCALLY AS "DEVIL'S oaks i` Ai , AM t 91 ..t'g' j • ELBOW „• - en grAlfr•-irL- Bi . 17,:-'----.77:- pits..1,6 KA* ri •.• ill !!i!i -. II(IlI) 1. : .:,..., It do.raileni.,-- mire ' g ` moo,;- . . I iiir a0 1111 -' : • e. elgo• --- Qo. ie s. I PI,_J `ii ALI! ``'`. ':''e "F e0 ‘ 1 I - i•, e o... — , . r, efnmes. , I fir o agp 4 IN Y' _Ye_ no t, FAQ • I • , c_v 1114,.- • .. as `.1 0 ', 1 i-vdir lail 1 I inveoei mom.' 71 . " , I IJ?r { II I I Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-2501 The removal, mutilation, destruction iiii MI 110 1111 II 1511 PI I• or concealment of this notice is a mis- 1 . - (_ I I--- 1. 4 . _ . II_ _ i.7.I____ IL__i___ i_______E_Ht_ I _:_ i_ l __iL__ f____ji.._t. __ f _ i. _ _ ',. _. _ . ,_ . _ 1 7;__i!, _. _ ii__ . . 1 I 4 -I - i: - 1 -f--1---'I"-------i----. - I- T-4 I I I j I I , i I -- - -- -- - ,- - i.--- I-- {--- -i----j-----i------1-.,..-I- - - -r 1_. -' -- I- - --- - -- i- - - - --'- - --- '! 1 t i I ; I I ! i j 1 i • I t f,kJc/1 /./lco/Ct aiiD ,ii t Da/ i v/c.//y/. 1 . W CA1 P9/17 - ) r4/a 70/ .4P4 I (.0.02/ I r '2 DDDS67f' S': r Z ie02/ 1 r pis Z x'‘%'i of i y a o d .z yam- 72 oo iP/D t_P,a 9d7 o/ 5Y 7J fe.r.) W, ,yam 9 %.? oh/ ii"6/ orb d'/ r'L 8 ei-( 2 _ 2 / 9 jD ei,6. 4Vod y- ay .40,. 1- 2rfrfy z4 /J'J.. 2 A.r oti i 3,/rtie, y- iJ W-f ')i((7 Ud AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Public Notice CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Audrey Benner BY being first duly sworn on oath states RENTON CITY COUNCIL t NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Ren- hat he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ton City Council has fixed the 21st day of March, 1988, at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Build- VALLEY DAILY NEWS ing, 200 Mill Avenue South Renton,Wash- ington, as the time and place for a public Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition hearing to consider the following: Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II, for the Daily newspapers published six(6) times a week.That said newspapers imposition of G-1, General zoning on 8.73 y are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six acres Annexationof proatin added i the HoneygCreekasrequiredbyKing months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published County Boundary Review Board. This in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kingincludes the area known locally as"Devil's gKent, Elbow.' County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Any and all interested person are invited to newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for be present to voice approval, disapproval or opinions on same. King County. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E Motor City Clerk The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Published in the Valley Daily News Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition and not in March 2,1988.R2834 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on March 2 , 1988 R2834 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 19 .2° Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4 th day of March 19 88 Notary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revsed 11 86 I NOTICE RENTON CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 21, 1988 AT 8: 00 P. M. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 10- 41___.P. 1-1.0-ipt• pg.:a, J. `. >; 31 - 11 RvzONI iuhe, l . TO CONSIDER HONEY CREEK REZONE, PHASE I.I , FORTHi•' i,. :,w. •., • •,. D. I--IIL LMAI' `.,• I. R t ,„ aa l IMPOSITION OF G-1, GENER I ZONING ON 8. 73 ACRES OF 911E DARK' w t ` R '" `IV r,l't I C; I1. ';PROPERTY ADDED TO THE 1/1 HONEY CREEK ANNEXATIONAI I,• tie—h. ' GCAIT•.1 CIT, LIM17# ix. • REOU I RED BY KING COUN TY Tliiii"--"--Tr\ l itTP BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD . 1 l!I .. I 1I. I THIS INCLUDES THE AREA a w[ l r+i SHnn•Hrlc. .,• Uo'qtx tef : u f©w • ' ; lfNp M,. de ! SA ' KNOWN LOCALLY AS DEVIL I.eIezee A ire, lei • ' ' • ff mo• ii 39,9L'SI'.81:eg eR'.Af'.o-,%'. 1 ELBOW. FI_4MLU mmmmCp6w• N*N P. doe i Sit :• :1.yliilfiil 1 rg 1011 t...r O,Jai-._. NAM O 41 . , ins:.: . I OOODOO.p 7 Q• ,.,,_we i Ar WM I a ®Imp bil 0 Nra Ng • h , a in ar. um, a ' • ral® PGD q ryyccxxrrofajSPMiI ®E7 twot-' Yi 'ti9{ 1i A v'' Si jpoi- m Nos No a mli r9 g i U v roq.H !egg • 11 .mi.. . z g. a y. e ens: f.., Im 6`e Niii .a0 .. r mi in _ice Q•: :• .eta J ' P 11114 s/d e;Se 1 I - l 11t . gig J 1 i ' n 1 1 1 f Jai afo :• f • • ie.1 ! _iD b: / 1 j J L • ..•r 1 jam'+ ; 1 r ^orii.l__. 1rV0 AO*, gil . .I l_: 11 . '` ' III :ari 'd Dono V/3 i 1 1 ani I 1 mooilo. Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-250 The c ornecmvmamouft itlhaits ionot idce sts rau crtnion Wa r n i demeanor punishable by fine and t imprisonment. V , CrOft,-PA elaiVia/I1,47 DvI 6:9"f/,o T i72Dz Z r 4/ 2az/ 91i/7 y Xt/ r4,/ d f/-7 -Cfix-70 09aeiA/ 6/ hvio# P1/ 91`9 D 7 4/fie/Molt to a 2 Wai G 4".Y.PI/a)gt leererAtti,fr et.fp ow gN '7AV f- f3.(1ts! /D :7 ,- 0 / 0102 ice 049 it/ peOtoy t. t ® . 4/8/7x- ,f09 ideal/ int/,or ot$(IW,W( 2.4 M V paopR i(/0 : 475/ vc t ?/':7 its 4L/ J7%1/ lr 7?Z' Jn J vaioff WL/ 3 it/ if y.?1e9 a&,aio1/ 4,Poa a i ebe o eagta 2P 7 ai dSldll!/,pv(4:? 4 , ate 7.54 7 4,zesfyz3',e;/ ". 5 6 V4// j' - ofiidd/u 227 an", / a//a Z4y 2 ..t 98d/ le/ "("db/ March 28. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes • Pane 96 Latecomer Agreement: Public Works Department requested draft ordinance establishing latecomer Procedure agreement procedure. Refer to Utilities Committee. CAG: 86-016, Grady Way Public Works Department submitted CAG-016-86, SW Grady Way Street Project Improvements; and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of $21,515.12, commencement of 30-day lien period, and release of retained amount of $44,885.83 to contractor, Gary Merlino Construction Co., if all required releases are received. Council concur. Streets: Funding for Public Works Department requested budget funding for removal of debris Removal of Debris from City streets and City-owned property to defray increased fees at transfer station. Refer to Utilities Committee. Utilities Committee Utilities Committee recommended acceptance of low bid from Omega CAG: 88-012, Mt. Olivet Contractors in the amount of $110,214.44 for Mt. Olivet and Highlands Pump Pump Station and Station Rehabilitation; and requested authorization for Mayor and City Clerk Highlands Pump Station to execute contract. Council concur. Rehabilitation Transportation Transportation Committee recommended acceptance of low bid from R. W. Committee Scott Construction Co. in the amount of $788,458.84 for SW Sunset Boulevard CAG: 87-074, SW Sunset Roadway Improvements (Rainier Avenue S. to west City limits); and Boulevard Roadway, requested authorization for Mayor and City Clerk to execute contract. Intersection and Council concur. Watermain Improvements MOVED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinances for second and final reading: PUD: Preliminary, Honey An ordinance was read approving a Preliminary Planned Unit Development in Creek, PPUD-015-84 the vicinity of 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue NE and generally south and southeast of Devil's Elbow for Honey Creek Associates, PPUD-015-84. Seeking further information on the area of the PPUD, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Fire: Underground Tank An ordinance was read amending Title VII (Fire Regulations) of City Code Secondary Containment by adding Chapter 12 establishing the Underground Storage Tank Secondary Ordinance Containment Ordinance. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Annexation: Honey An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property located Creek, Phase II, and to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE) to G-1, General, Rezone classification; Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. LID: 334, NE 44th Street An ordinance was read ordering the construction and installation of roadways and Lake Washington of three, four and five lane configurations, to consist of curbs, gutters, Boulevard sidewalks, storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water mains, paving, street lighting, signalization, channelization, undergrounding of power, telephone and cable TV, downstream drainage, cleaning of retention ponds, ditching, excavation, and construction of embankments and other necessary improvements and appurtenances in the vicinity in and near NE 44th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard with Resolution No. 2704 of the City Council of the City of Renton, establishing Local Improvement District No. 334, and the approximate cost thereof; providing assessments upon property in said district; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement warrants, bonds or notes or other financing means as provided by law and establishing a special fund (LID #334). MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL REFER THIS ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT MARCH 28, 1988 ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for second and final reading: Honey Creek Associates PPUD (PPUD-015-84) - located in the vicinity of the 2200 block of Jefferson Avenue N.E. and generally south and southeast of Devil ' s Elbow) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for first reading: Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance Honey Creek Phase II Rezone - 8.73 acres located to the northwest of Devil ' s Elbow Road ( 120th Place SE) Ordinance Ordering Construction of LID #334 Dalpay Rezone (R-072-87) R-1 to R-3 - located at 715 Sunset Blvd. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS Having received departmental certification that merchandise/services have been received or rendered, the Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 39380 through No. 39718 in the amount of $935, 779.22; Vouchers 39383, 39386 - 39393 machine voided. Richard Stredicke, Chairman 4Rob Hughes 7:)X-/f/r/iL. 4a4/ Nancy Maews rfi u/p ti Co CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor MEMORANDUM DATE: March 22, 1988 TO: Nancy Mathews, Councilwoman FROM: Carrie Trimnell, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone King County Park Holdings At the direction of Larry Springer, I have identified the area encompassed by King County's proposed May Creek Park, the properties which are currently owned by the King County Parks Department, and the existing Renton and King County zoning designations applicable to these properties (please refer to the attached map). King County has numerous land holdings in the vicinity of the Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone. In King County, these properties are zoned SE - Suburban Estate, which requires a minimum lot size of 35,000 square feet. The purpose of this zone is to provide areas for single-family dwellings and related uses at rural densities. The County owns properties in the City of Renton which are zoned primarily G-1 General Use. This zone is equivalent to the County's SE zone in both the minimum lot size and the permitted uses. The County also owns properties in Renton zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential. In addition, they intend to acquire a parcel currently zoned R-4 High Density Multi-Family. This property is involved in a City-initiated rezone from R-4 to staff's recommended G-1. King County does not have a Public Use zone similar to Renton's P-1 Public Use zone. In summary, the imposition of G-1 zoning on the Phase II parcel of the Honey Creek Annexation and Rezone is in keeping with both the City and the County's zoning of the properties held by the County for the proposed May Creek Park. I hope this information will be of assistance to you. If you have any questions, or if I can be of additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at x2552. cry 0-.1- otrA.T/1N MAR 2 2Sed RI,! I n ct:dsk3a:hc6 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2552 It. r• " I rr-11..›/i 6 1 ; kr: !.1 tz 1.. T.:1•o: 7- 67._• ; 1 144-;. 1 1lllSf- • :al •1 V. .-_.tea _.' f r•;.,1, "---------;"..•:. . ',. k..... 7tkzpsycd ‘.....715#5.60 001,....Ivii\ e4t• id t-•eict, •.•r . . r:' . 1! c 2 , •IiT f•t 7 t a, • p. 1S3tl)17n (. 1 • OT di7 m1.1-71 *. I q ,,,.;; 1 I fa.r !--:--T'••_ G22 ri:;T. 1' Gv: r 2 7 '—C-9-2— I 2 2 •42 6G2 Y•• SV, 1 r• _ •T .r.I1--t_ • I r 1 I I I I r c, t 1 74. •u I 1• 1D. 1• • e+tT- 1;^-1 L• . .or. z" town ' r T i£G 272 C.2 CV2 Hr 1altt -r-• ,i-le• / r'••.. _. '---.. '.• _- r.' T• " u.•- arrr i. t--: •-`•r•., mot , • . •1•, t I,';..•.J't s •,.I•_; ®^1rt;rr1• F:17 ...r 1, I I j,i,t•I rai SHOtI K2 TI;Nt 7.7 441 Fi-__ itc• --.. ri is 1 i, 1 ; I co: , 92;2 ec2 Two T ,•^. `•'1 I 11' I AHH3H 7.t'L. r-1f—• It:'/ l allI IIT. z '!I•\ t—e Ticj\gym . 1 . 1 ` I I LL7I( !---' it FF 1 IF•-• 1.- r ,I1 rTi - I •62 K1z! I :Z;2 Lcz o 1W1I • ^/r'.• t I i i I I /C7 1 112 N. 5• A' •• cot 02 z Il c z cc z cu o7z 1 6 f 1 (•., ,. a. r:••.•.r... f 4' ter O'I arc a.ot a S.:.•/ f zx 10011Ir' • J1' r :: t.c r I c ar''ar/d,; za. 0060- 1 3TM:: ere,0' Jr,. - 4 7,65rzezirezi4 7. Tc i:i i •1 1 1 11c MC I r 1..*.. 1. 1 1,.. '•'A:T:: 1 7•C Il l Ir 1111 l Z . . 7F, 1 i i.1 AC I F I.AC.:_Li.... .. ..• . . . . ........... 1 -----...: 16.--... . b_. r. ...... .--, II ,, v.:• . , I j I,• c o•. I —a I o' " c • O. 11 1 r/ I•' r o'r tiliF 1 •' \ • l i- I.r..lsSa . I I. Fi•I•.Ja.. I .M. I ;, J . I .I a ; , . I , I• 14 L,i-- 1 1 l I 1 I• i- rI/ 111 01( a 9 C, 74F______ zi•.: F,,,,s.Arc a7.44 1 '' i • y• • I t 1 • I 1 ' It c • f 4 1' I T I • I • 1 1 /..,iD t C - • 1921 i 11I s 11 rit It - 1 iI March 21, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 85 Responding to complaints regarding increases in assessments, Mr. Houghton advised that the increases are due to costs of engineering, sales tax, interest on bonds, bond attorney, bond discount, and contingency factor which adds roughly 50% to the overall assessment. He indicated that the estimate takes into account escalation of costs over the next two years during construction of the LID. Referring to restrictive covenants running with the land on Parcels #1, #6, 9, and #10, City Attorney Warren advised that owners of those parcels may not protest the formation of the LID; however, they may protest the amount of their assessment at the finalization of the LID roll. He clarified that all protests heard at this point are in fact protests made to the amount of the assessment, not the formation of the LID. Finally, he cautioned that at the final LID assessment roll, the City may not assess the property more than it is benefited by the improvements, and the benefit is normally measured by the increase in the fair market value of the property due to the improvements. Responding to further Council inquiry, Public Works Director Houghton noted that property owners benefit when the City is responsible for the coordination of engineering, construction, and inspection of the LID, they would not receive a bill for approximately 2-1/2 years, and they would have the option of paying the assessment plus interest over a 10-year period. Mr. Houghton felt that in view of protest percentage, he would recommend against the LID. Upon inquiry, he confirmed that 86% of the property owners had initiated the LID. Upon inquiry regarding the proposed traffic signal at the I-405 ramp at NE 44th Street, Public Works Director Houghton explained that none of the parcels would be required by itself to construct the $100,000 signal. However, as parcels develop, owners would be required to share the cost of the signal, and since no participants exist on the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard north of NE 44th, costs would be shared by the entire area. It was also noted that if this LID is terminated, the City would have to enforce deferrals that are lapsing, improvements would be installed piecemeal, and the signal would not be installed. Upon inquiry, Mr. Houghton indicated that funds could be set aside through the NE 44th traffic mitigation for installation of the signal and widening of the bridge in the future. Responding to Council inquiry, Attorney Warren explained that a deferral is a grant of a privilege and is reviewed yearly by the City, but if necessary, the Board of Public Works could call a deferral at any time and order the improvements. He further noted that NE 44th is an area designated by the City as an traffic mitigation area by the Environmental Review Committee, and if the Hearing Examiner does not have jurisdiction to impose participatory conditions upon development, the Environmental Review Committee certainly does and has in the past. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON LID 334. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL PROCEED WITHLIDNO. 334. CARRIED. MOVED BY MATHEWS, SECONDED BY HUGHES, THIS ITEM BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, publishedandAnnexation: Honey mailed in accordance with State and local laws, Mayor Clymer openedtheCreek, Phase II, and public hearing to consider the concurrent Honey Creek annexationandRezonerezone, Phase II, for 8.73 acres located to the northwest of Devil's Elbow Road (120th Place SE). Referring to a vicinity map, Policy Development Director Larry Springer designated the location of the subject site and provided background information. He explained that the Boundary Review Board had invoked jurisdiction on the annexation, originally accepted by the City Council on 5/12/86, and added the Devil's Elbow Road right-of-wayandthetwoadditionalparcelsoflandlocatedtothenorthwestoftheroad. The expanded annexation became effective on 11/25/87, and the subject hearing is being held to impose G-1, general, zoning on thisenvironmentallysensitiveareainkeepingwithsurroundingG-1 zoning imposed on Phase Ioftheannexation. 1 1 March 21. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 86 Upon Council inquiry, Mr. Springer confirmed that KingCountyownsons most of the subject property, it is proposed for future park use, and either G-1 or P-1, public, zoning would be appropriate on the site since development potential is limited. Councilwoman Mathews asked for clarification of the area on which calculation of density for the Honey Creek PUD was based, and zoning of King County property. Mr. Springer advised that the Building and Zoning Department would provide a report on the matter. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CLOSE THE HEARING ON THE HONEY CREEK ANNEXATION AND REZONE, PHASE II. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND IMPOSE G-1 ZONING ON THE PROPERTY. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY HUGHES, REFER THIS MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER LEGISLATION. CARRIED. PROCLAMATION Proclamation by Mayor Clymer declared March 20-26, 1988, as National National DeMolay Week DeMolay Week in Renton to honor the 69th Anniversary of the Order of DeMolay, a character-building organization of young men from thirteen to twenty-one years of age; to tender recognition to their millions of Senior DeMolays, in expressing our grateful appreciation for the fine examples set by them in contributing to the welfare of our community by addressing themselves to the building of good character among our youth; thereby aiding in the development of leadership for tomorrow. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Ralph Evans, 3306 NE 1 I th Place, Renton, representative of Neighbors for Citizen Comment: Evans R-1 Preservation, questioned who would own proposed Good ShepherdgroupGoodShepherdGrouphomesfordevelopmentallydisabledyouthiftheusewasdiscontinuedinthe Homes, Public Hearing future; complained that public hearing/meeting notices are not beingremovedNoticesfromtelephonepolesinatimelymanner; and requested a list of Council members who have visited group homes as invited by representatives of Good Shepherd. Citizen Comment: Jett -Kathleen M. Jett, 583 Kirkland Avenue NE, Renton, read letter addressedtoRVTICourtCaseMayorClymerandCouncilregardinglawsuittheCityhadjoinedwith Renton School District, et al. v. Allen Jett, et ux., matter denied by Washington Supreme Court, and requested a statement itemizing the total sum expended by the City of Renton as a result of the City's participation in the lawsuit. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. CAG: 88-009, 1988 City Clerk reported bid opening 3/16/88 for 1988 Rubberized TrackMaterialRubberizedTrackforGradeCrossing; 2 bids; Engineer's estimate: $75,000. Refer to Material for Grade Transportation Committee. Crossing Rezone: Dalpay, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of Dalpay request for rezonefromR-072-87 R-1, single family residential, to R-3, medium density multifamily, for 0.23 acres located at 715 Sunset Boulevard, R-072-87; restrictive covenants as required by Examiner filed with King County on 3/16/88. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Annexation: Maplewood Policy Development Department requested a public hearing be set onAprilGolfCourse, and Rezone 18, 1988, to consider Maplewood Golf Course annexation and concurrent rezone to P-I, public, zone. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Milt Cantellay, 16624-104th SE, Renton, Utility: Cantellay Sewer requesting authorization to connect to City sewer due to septic tank failure,Connection and agreeing to sign restrictive covenants to annex to the City; accompanying letter from King County Public Health Department set deadline of March 29, 1988, to connect to sewer line, if available, or take other action to correct sewage problem. Public Works Director Houghton advised that as a result of excavation on adjacent property, Mr. Cantellay's drainfield was dug up, resultingindischargeofeffluentuponthegroundsurface. King County sanitarian F i cci r &cord O % , C Cler 014-84, PPUD-015-84 ct, C i o Iii6nier'° Z ktiy -m, w A 9t50ss- RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS COMES NOW MICK C. SANTA and BOB TOMERG of Honey Creek Associates and do hereby impose the following Restrictive Covenants : There shall be no development, site plan or planned unit development approval upon the property without the City being provided with geotechnical studies regarding the site and fire and police services are provided . on the property legally described as follows : B" & "C" See Exhibit "A"/attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. This Covenant is a covenant running with the land and is binding upon all successors in interest to thesubjectQ 0 property. V) Dated : March f Lo , 1988. 0 CO Mick . Santa/ Bob- Tomb QQ 4 0270 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) RE+=C' F t Ct. +_++i ss 11 COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mick C. Santa and Bob Tomberg signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated : March/6 , 1988. d)'-'2e,t(A Notary Pu 'c for the State of Washington My appointment expires: /( . ' CITY5 : 06/2/26/88 T '', EXHIBIT "A" HONE. _,SEEK REZONE phase I PARCEL A - 2 zoning That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet; Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 83°06'22" West a distance of 400.00 feet; Thence North 48°06'22" West a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence North 0°53'38" East a distance of 437.58 feet; 0 Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 280.00 feet; C? Thence South 34°58'05" East a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence South 1°06'22" East a distance of 235.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning.1.4 O 6D Page 1 of 1 1F.H.3.12.AJH:mf 11/13/87 EXHIBIT "B" HONEY CREEK REZONE phase I PARCEL C R-1 zoning That portion Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence South 88'19'25" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15'59" East a distance of 1034.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence South 57'15' 59" West a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 81'42' 58" West a distance of 311. 13 feet; Thence North 32'14' 00" West a distance of 330.00 feet; QThence North 24'14 ' 00" West a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence North 1'16' 00" East a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 88'15'36" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 1'15'59" West a distance of 392.70 feet; 00 017 Thence South 88'15' 36" East a distance of 555.64 feet; Thence South 1'15' 59" West a distance of 480.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned Southwest Corner; Thence South 88' 19' 23" East a distance of 1288.90 feet along the South line of said Southeast 1/4; Thence North 1'15' 59" East a distance of 114.74 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence North 9'08'56" West a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence North 57'15 '59" East a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 1'15' 59" West a distance of 760.00 feet; to the True Point of Beginning. Page 1 of 2 TOGETHER WITH That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4, of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North 0'53'38" East a dlstance of 630.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North 0'53 '38" East a distance of 538.25 feet; 04 Thence South 46'06,22" East a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 11'06'22" East a distance of 105.00 feet; 41 Thence North 88'15' 15" West a distance of 110.00 feet; 00 Thence South 0'53'38" West a distance of 437.58 feet; Thence South 48'06' 22" East a distance of 228.60 feet; Thence South 83'06'22" East a distance of 500.00 feet; Thence South 0'47' 11" East a distance of 203.69 feet; Thence North 88'19'25" West a distance of 779.99 feet; Thence North 0'53' 38" East a distance of 630.00 feet; Thence North 88'19' 25" West a distance of 59.98 feet to the True Point of Beginning. ' Page 2 of 2 1F.H.3.11.AJH:mf 12/11/87 EXHIBIT "C" HONEY CREEK REZC..._ phase I PARCEL B G-1 zonii That portion of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest C) 1/4 of said Section 4; 04 Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 839.97 feet to the True Point C of Beginning; 1.4 Thence North 0°47' 11" West a distance of 203.69 feet; M Thence North 83°06'22" West a distance of 100.00 feet; Gn Thence North 1°06' 22" West a distance of 235.00 feet; 010 Thence North 34°58'05" West a distance of 481 .65 feet; Thence North 88°15' 15" West a distance of 170.00 feet; Thence North 11 °06'22" West a distance of 105.00 feet; Thence North 46°06'22" West a distance of 345.00 feet; Thence South 88°15' 15" East a distance of 185.29 feet to an intersection with the East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; Thence North along said East line of the West 185.29 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4 to the South Right-of-Way Line of S.E. 97th Street (120th Place S.E. and also known as Devils Elbow) ; Thence Southeasterly along said Right-of-Way Line to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northwest with a radius of 80.00 feet, and a center which bears North 38°15' 25" East; Thence Easterly and Northerly along said curve an arc distance of 213.84 feet; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of said 120th Place Southeast a distance of 260.3 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 125.0 feet and a center which bears North 65°06'50" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line an arc distance of 72.3 feet to the point of reverse curve, said curve being concave to the Southwest and has a radius of 134.35 feet; Thence Northwesterly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to a point of tangency an arc distance of 135.2 feet; Page 1 of 2 Thence North 49°23'20" West along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line a distance of 15.8 feet to a point of curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast with a radius of 60.0 feet and a center which bears North 40°36'40" East; Thence Northerly along said curve and said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the West Line of the East 1111 .28 feet of the Northeast 0 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 4; 4 Thence Northerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the r. Plat of Paradise Estates, as recorded in Volume 95 of Plats, Page 93, records r"4 of King County, Washington; 0 O Thence South 88°15'36" East a distance of 55.60 feet; 00 Thence South 1 °16'00" West a distance of 205.00 feet; Thence South 24°14'00" East a distance of 700.00 feet; Thence South 32°14'00" East a distance of 330.00 feet; Thence North 81°42'58" East a distance of 311 . 13 feet; Thence North 57°15'59" East a distance of 320.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15' 59" West a distance of 160.00 feet; Thence South 57°15'59" West a distance of 450.00 feet; Thence South 9°08'56" East a distance of 514.84 feet; Thence South 88°19'25" East a distance of 280.00 feet; Thence South 1 °15'59" West a distance of 114.74 feet; Thence North 88°19'25" West a distance of 448.93 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 1F.3.21 .AJH:mf 01/18/88 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st day AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION of March, 1988, at 7:30 p.m. (REVISED) in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,Washington, as the time and place Audrey Benner being first duly sworn on oath states for a public hearing to consider the follow- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the ngHoney Creek Rezone, Phase II, for the imposition of G-1, General zoning on 8.73 acres of property added to the Honey VALLEY DAILY NEWS Creek Annexation as required by King County Boundary Review Board. This Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition includes the area known locally as "Devil's Elbow.' Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers Any and all interested persons are invit- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ed to be present to voice approval, disap- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published • proval or opinions on same. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King CITY OF RENTON County,Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal Maxine Motor g 1?P g City Clerk newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 6, King County. 1988.Valley Daily News. R5001 The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of Public Hearing was published on March 6 , ] 9RR R5001 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 2 4 . 32 Subscribed and sworn to before me this16 th day ofM a r ch 19 88 Not ry Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VON#87 Revised 11/86 Fr CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st day of March, 1988, at 7 : 30 p.m. (REVISED) in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II , for the imposition of G-1 , General zoning on 8. 73 acres of property added to the Honey Creek Annexation as required by King County Boundary Review Board . This includes the area known locally as "Devil 's Elbow. " Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E . Motor City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 6, 1988 Acct . #50640 CITY OF RENTON NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY RENTON CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st day of March 19 88 , at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington, as the time and place for a public hearing to consider the following: Honey Creek Rezone, Phase II, for the imposition of G-1, General zoning on 8.73 acres of property added to the Honey Creek Annexation as required by King County Boundary Review Board. This includes the area known locally as "Devil's Elbow." Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , disapproval or opinions on same. CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk DATE OF PUBLICATION: March 2, 1988 NOTICE RENTON CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 21, 1988 AT 7: 30 p. m. RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH 31.05 TO CONSIDER HONEY CREEK 1 RV- He-, fh. e, 7L REZONE, PHASE I I , FOR T1 E 1L L'` IMPOSITION OF G-1, GENE Al He-n-t' 1" '8co 1 ZONING ON 8. 73 ACRES OF GRFE •'::JARK PROPERTY ADDED TO THE LK COW. HONEY CREEK ANNEXATION . Sown / I I •ir 1".` I'; 1 1 ,,, b• REQUIRED BY KING COUNTY Y9, o, t. ttl •( ,,, IL nu,T•.r CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD , 1 QI ll 0 1 r' 1 i THIS INCLUDES THE AREA x na QO i R' n 61., / i SIF... KNOWN LOCALLY AS "DEVIL S uc„ nl Ae "_ ; ttu+uiur Wit es '; ; ELBOW, "epee riaaase a ifoh. sm R.,,„ 401.-mi!':,.• -j:!",-•-- --I 4- 44 gatAr. 77 =Et 1 irqnce..... t.ly T.- ..rlirillit,E. laskil-I lirltili I • ' ii 146-mei ra UP, 5.. "pi I. cs: . NI EiPolgol-Vit. P. Neljk Asy 2:14.% rs" . gaillatil milNMIwm'T so q « `:; Q., ism ; a VP o I w 'i91 a d0: Tdd =1a to mliL r'i,e N :tl .,1, a i .. 0 II161"'` id' *-' :' P-:: .. Ord a: --L i Q' '-,- eIA `S. R 1 Ike-e• ill , , 11iM11m1i1rZ1. i4E. 1 , 01" ) 111:11 Ida 1011108 ' — Ile M I ikpi'igri: . E. Amu _ -;ies'a 't 1 W I•^ rr OD 101 / ,,, 7/ . '^ ( 1 °r':n oi12• Complete legal description &further information available in the City Clerk's Office - 235-2r )1 I Warg iTh eremoval, mutilation, destrueiinn n ' n ar concealment of this notice is a is- demeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. CERTIFICATION