HomeMy WebLinkAboutREGULAR COUNCIL - 08 Jun 2015 - Agenda - PdfAGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
June 8, 2015
Monday, 7 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2.ROLL CALL
3.SPECIAL PRESENTATION
a. Community Services Department Awards
4.APPEAL
a. Planning and Development Committee Report re: Reserve at Tiffany Park
INABILITY OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO TAKE TESTIMONY ON APPEALS DURING COUNCIL MEETINGS
State law requires that the City establish a process to handle appeals from application
of environmental and developmental rules and regulations. The Renton City Council, feeling it was
best for the elected representatives to handle the appeals rather than require citizens to go to
court, has retained appellate jurisdiction to itself.
The courts have held that the City Council, while sitting as an appellate body, is acting as a quasi-
judicial body and must obey the rules of procedure of a court more than that of a political body.
By City Code, and by State law, the City Council may not consider new evidence in this appeal. The
parties to the appeal have had an opportunity to address their arguments to the Planning &
Development Committee of the City Council at a meeting previously held. Because of the court
requirements prohibiting the City Council from considering new evidence, and because all parties
have had an opportunity to address their concerns to the Planning & Development Committee,
the City Council may not consider oral or written testimony at the City Council meeting. The
Council understands that this is frustrating to citizens and is outside the normal process of open
discourse provided to citizenry during the audience comment portion of the City Council meeting.
However, this burden of not allowing Council to be addressed concerning pending appeals is
outweighed by the quick, inexpensive and local appeal process provided by the Renton City
Council.
5.ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
6.AUDIENCE COMMENT
(Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The first
comment period is limited to one-half hour. The second comment period later on in the agenda is
unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and
state your name and city of residence for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
NOTICE to all participants: pursuant to state law, RCW 42.17A.555, campaigning for any ballot
measure or candidate in City Hall and/or during any portion of the council meeting, including the
audience comment portion of the meeting, is PROHIBITED.
Page 1 of 24
7.CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 6/1/2015. Council concur.
b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015 for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb
Ramps project; and submits staff recommendation to accept the lowest responsive bid submitted by
Lakeridge Paving Company, LLC. in the amount of $870,561.31. Council concur.
c. Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. the City of
Renton, et al. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services.
8.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked
with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if
further review is necessary.
9.RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
10.NEW BUSINESS
(Includes Council Committee agenda topics; visit rentonwa.gov/cityclerk for more information.)
11.AUDIENCE COMMENTS
12.ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
June 8, 2015
Monday, 6:00 p.m.
Metro Transit Long Range Plan
Committee to End Homelessness Briefing
Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21
To view Council Meetings online please visit rentonwa.gov/councilmeetings
Page 2 of 24
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
Contract Award for Bid Opening on 5/27/2015;
CAG-15-081; 2015 Street Patch and Overlay with
Curb Ramps Project
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 08 Jun 2015
Exhibits:
A. Staff Recommendation
B. Bid Tab
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
City Clerk
Staff Contact:
Jason Seth, City Clerk, ext. 6502
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ 870,561.31 Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ 1,003,008.68 City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineers Estimate: $952,659.54
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three
criteria:
l There was more than one bid.
l The low bid was within the project budget.
l There were no irregularities with the lowest responsive bid.
Staff recommends acceptance of the lowest responsive bid by Lakeridge Paving Company, LLC., in the
amount of $870,561.31 for the 2015 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the lowest responsive bid submitted by Lakeridge Paving Company, LLC., in the amount of
$870,561.31 for the 2015 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps project.
7b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015
for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay Page 3 of 24
PUBLICWORKSDEPARTMENTMEM0RANDUMDATE:May28,2015TO:JasonSeth,CityClerkFROM:94—JaysonGrant,PavementManagementTechnician,ext.7400SUBJECT:BidOpeningfor2015StreetPatchandOverlaywithCurbRamps,CAG-15-081ThebidopeningwasheldonWednesday,May27,2015,andtherewerefourbidsreceived.LakeridgePaving,CompanyLLC.hadtheapparentlowbidintheamountof$870,561.31brokedownamongthree(3)schedulesasfollows:ScheduleA(CityofRentonOverlayfunding)$736,352.63ScheduleB(CityofRentonSewerEngineering)$102,430.68ScheduleC(CityofRentonTransportationEngineering)$31,778.00$870,561.31TheEngineersEstimateforthiscontractwasasfollows:ScheduleA$715,230.23ScheduleB$144,889.31ScheduleC$92,540.00$952,659.54TheTransportationDivisionrecommendsthatthebidfromLakeridgePavingCompanyCCC.beacceptedandthecontractforthe2015StreetPatchandOverlaywithCurbRampsbeawardedintheamountof$870,561.31.Thetotalbudgetforthisprojectis$1,003,008.68,anditisfundedbytheStreetOverlayProgram,TransportationEngineeringandSewerEngineering.TheEngineer’sestimatefortheconstructionofthe2015StreetPatchandOverlaywithCurbRamps,underthiscontract,is$952,659.54.Wearerequestingthatanagendabillfor“CouncilConcur”bepreparedfortheJune8,2015CouncilMeetingaccordingly.Ifyouhaveanyadditionalquestionsorconcernspleasecontactmeatext.7400.Attachment:BidTabulationcc:BobHanson,DesignSupervisorJamesWilhoit,CivilEngineerJ:\5TREET\PMS\2015\clerkldoc2015.doc7b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015 for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay Page 4 of 24
CityofRentonContractor:LakeridgePavingCompany,LLCContractor:LakesideIndustries,Inc.Contractor:CemexIncContractorMilesResources,LLCBIDDATE:May27,2014EngineersEstimateItemDescriptionUnitEat.UnitBidUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidNo.QuantityPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountSchedule“A’001.MobilizationLumpSum1.00$45,000.00$45,000.00$50,000.00$50,000.00$116,500.00$116,500.00$80,000.00$80,000.00$108,000.00$108,000.00002.ProjectTemporaryTrafficControlLumpSum1.00$65,000.00$65,000.00$64,000.00$64,000.00$100,000.00$100,000.00$127,500.00$127,500.00$154,500.00$154,500.00003.HMACL.1/2”PG64-22Ton186.00$88.00$16,368.00$95.00$17,670.00$80.00$14,880.00$77.50$14,415.00$92.50$17,205.00For2”Qveday004.HMACL.1/2”PG64-22Ton350.00$88.00$30,800.00$85.00$29,750.00$80.00$28,000.00$93.50$32,725.00$92.50$32,375.00For3”Dverlay005.HMACL.1/2“PG64-22Ton3,832.00$82.00$314,224.00$83.00$318,056.00$80.00$306,560.00$84.50$323,804.00$87.00$333,384.00For4”FullStreetPatch006.RemovingAsphaltConcretePavementSquareYard1,005.00$8.50$8,542.50$8.00$8,040.00$4.00$4,020.00$5.70$5,728.50$8.60$8,643.00ByColdPlaning007.RemovingAsphaltConcretePavementSquareYard16,799.00$6.50$109,193.50$7.00$117,593.00$6.00$100,794.00$5.80$97,434.20$9.15$153,710.85(ByColdPlaning4”)ForFullStreetPatchandMiscPatches008.RoadwayExcavationIncludingHaulCubicYard80.00$38.00$3,040.00$50.00$4,000.00$50.00$4,000.00$75.00$6,000.00$85.00$6,800.00009.QnMap#6RemovingRoadBaae6”to8”CubicYard90.00$45.00$4,050.00$50.00$4,500.00$50.00$4,500.00$40.80$3,672.00$85.00$7,650.00IncludingHaul010.DnMap#8RemovingSubGradeSoftSpotsCubicYard40.00$45.00$1,800.00$50.00$2,000.00$50.00$2,000.00$85.00$3,400.00$85.00$3,400.00Upto2’DeepIncludingHaul011.QnMap#8Install2”to4”Rock(NotReclaim)Ton50.00$20.00$1,000.00$40.00$2,000.00$30.00$1,500.00$85.80$4,290.00$50.00$2,500.00ForSoftSpots012.QnMap#8InstallGeotextileWovenFabricSquareYard266.00$6.00$1,596.00$2.50$665.00$1.00$266.00$7.00$1,862.00$1.00$266.00ForSoftSpots013.CrushedSurfacingTopCourseTon200.00$28.00$5,600.00$30.00$6,000.00$20.00$4,000.00$50.00$10,000.00$20.00$4,000.00014.AdjustMonumentEach9.00$395.00$3,555.00$285.00$2,565.00$300.00$2,700.00$250.00$2,250.00$350.00$3,150.007b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015 for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay Page 5 of 24
CityofRentonContractor:LakeridgePavingCompany,LLCContractor:LakesideIndustries,Inc.Contractor:CemexIncContractor:MilesResources,LLCBIDDATE:May27,2014EngineersEstimateItemDescriptionUnitEat.UnitBidUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidNo.QuantityPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmount015.AdjustManholeEach13.00$400.00$5,200.00$495.00$6,435.00$500.00$6,500.00$450.00$5,850.00$400.00$5,200.00016.AdjustWaterValveBoxEach31.00$395.00$12,245.00$285.00$8,835.00$300.00$9,300.00$250.00$7,750.00$350.00$10,850.00017.4”RaisedPavementMarkerEach24.00$11.00$264.00$20.00$480.00$20.00$480.00$16.00$384.00$20.00$480.00Type1,Yellow018.4”RaisedPavementMarketEach2.00$32.00$64.00$20.00$40.00$20.00$40.00$16.00$32.00$20.00$40.00Type2d,Yellow019.4”RaisedPavementMarkerEach11.00$25.00$275.00$25.00$275.00$25.00$275.00$16.00$176.00$25.00$275.00Type2b,BIue020.ThermoPlasticStopBar(18”Wide)LinearFoot89.00$12.00$1,068.00$10.00$890.00$10.00$890.00$9.00$801.00$10.00$890.00021.4”WhiteEdgeofRoadline(FOG)LinearFoot1,300.00$2.00$2,600.00$0.77$1,001.00$0.77$1,001.00$2.00$2,600.00$1.00$1,300.00022.RetrofltTruncatedDomesOnSquareFoot50.00$65.00$3,250.00$57.50$2,875.00$60.00$3,000.00$67.00$3,350.00$65.00$3,250.00ExisingCurbRamps023.CurbRamp,CementConcreteEach5.00$3,550.00$17,750.00$3,200.00$16,000.00$3,250.00$16,250.00$3,578.30$17,891.50$2,000.00$10,000.00StandardPlanF-40.15-02SeeSpecialProvision8-14.4024.CurbRamp,CementConcreteEach9.00$3,550.00$31,950.00$5,000.00$45,000.00$4,800.00$43,200.00$5,322.90$47,906.10$3,800.00$34,200.00StandardPlanF-40.12-02SeeSpecialProvision8-14.4025.CurbRamp,CementConcreteEach2.00$3,550.00$7,100.00$4,800.00$9,600.00$4,700.00$9,400.00$5,138.10$10,276.20$3,600.00$7,200.00StandardPlanF-40.16-02SeeSpecialProvision8-14.4026.SawcutConcrete4”-6”LinearFoot68.00$5.00$340.00$3.50$238.00$10.00$680.00$29.50$2,006.00$5.00$340.00027.SawcutAsphalt4”-6”LinearFoot63.00$5.20$327.60$3.50$220.50$10.00$630.00$31.75$2,000.25$5.00$315.00028.RemoveConcreteCurbandGutterLinearFoot60.00$40.00$2,400.00$34.00$2,040.00$50.00$3,000.00$16.50$990.00$180.00$10,800.00029.RemoveConcreteSidewalkSquareYard42.53$70.00$2,977.10$62.00$2,636.86$50.00$2,126.50$23.50$999.46$250.00$10,632.507b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015 for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay Page 6 of 24
CityofRentonContractor:LakeridgePavingCompany,LLCContractor:LakesideIndustries,Inc.Contractor:CemexIncContractor:MilesResources,LLCBIDDATE:May27,2014EngineersEstimateItemDescriptionUnitEst.UnitBidUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidNo.QuantityPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmount030.RemoveAsphaltSquareYard7.31$68.00$497.08$55.00$402.05S50.00$365.50$68.40$500.00$90.00$657.90031.CementConc.TrafficCurbandGutterLinearFoot57.00$38.00$2,166.00$35.10$2,000.70$40.00$2,280.00$43.00$2,451.00$40.00$2,280.00032.CementConcreteSidewalkSquareYard37.99$55.00$2,089.45$56.16$2,133.52$60.00$2,279.40$111.00$4,216.89$65.00$2,469.35033.TopsoilTypeACubicYard4.97$300.00$1,491.00$250.00$1,242.50$150.00$745.50$201.21$1,000.01$350.00$1,739.50034.InstallSodSquareYard26.40$30.00$792.00$40.00$1,056.00$50.00$1,320.00$18.94$500.02$50.00$1,320.00035.InstallBeautyBarkCubicYard2.05$300.00$615.00$250.00$512.50$250.00$512.50$243.90$500.00$450.00$922.50036.ErosionandSedimentControlLumpSum1.00$5,000.00$5,000.00$2,800.00$2,800.00$15,000.00$15,000.00$500.00$500.00$11,500.00$11,500.00037.FinishandCleanUpLumpSum1.00$5,000.00$5,000.00$2,800.00$2,800.00$2,500.00$2,500.00$500.00$500.00$6,000.00$6,000.00TotalSchedule“A”$715,230.23$736,352.63$811,495.40$826,261.12$958,245.60Schedule“B”001.MobilizationLumpSum1.00$20,000.00$20,000.00$10,000.00$10,000.00$5,000.00$5,000.00$2,000.00$2,000.00$15,000.00$15,000.00002.ProjectTemporaryTrafficControlLumpSum1.00$25,000.00$25,000.00$18,000.00$18,000.00$5,000.00$5,000.00$3,000.00$3,000.00$18,500.00$18,500.00003.HMAClass1/2PG64-22Ton110.00$85.00$9,350.00$100.00$11,000.00$85.00$9,350.00$130.00$14,300.00$92.50$10,175.00For2”Overlay004.HMAClass1/2PG64-22Ton328.00$83.00$27,224.00$81.00$26,568.00$85.00$27,880.00$95.00$31,160.00$90.00$29,520.00For4FullStreetPatch005.RemovingAsphaltConcretePavementSquareYard150.00$7.00$1,050.00$34.00$5,100.00$7.00$1,050.00$20.00$3,000.00$20.00$3,000.00ByColdPlaning006.RemovingAsphaltConcretePavementSquareYard1,440.00$7.00$10,080.00$8.50$12,240.00$8.00$11,520.00$8.00$11,520.00$12.75$18,360.00(ByColdPlaning4”)ForFullStreetPatchandMiscPatches007.CrushedSurfacingTopCourseTon80.00$35.00$2,800.00$36.00$2,880.00$30.00$2,400.00$50.00$4,000.00$20.00$1,600.007b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015 for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay Page 7 of 24
CityofRentonContractor:LakeridgePavingCompany,LLCContractor:LakesideIndustries,Inc.Contractor:CemexIncContractor:MilesResources,LLCBIDDATE:May27,2014EngineersEstimateItemDescriptionUnitEst.UnitBidUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidNo.QuantityPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmount008.AdjustManholeEach4.00$400.00$1,600.00$495.00$1,980.00$500.00$2,000.00$450.00$1,800.00$400.00$1,600.00009.AdjustWaterValveEach3.00$395.00$1,185.00$285.00$855.00$300.00$900.00$250.00$750.00$350.00$1,050.00010.4”RaisedPavementMarketEach288.00$30.00$8,640.00$4.75$1,368.00$4.75$1,368.00$7.50$2,160.00$5.00$1,440.00Type1,Yellow011.4”RaisedPavementMarkerEach32.00$30.00$960.00$4.75$152.00$4.75$152.00$7.50$240.00$5.00$160.00Type2d,Yellow012.4”RaisedPavementMarkerEach1.00$30.00$30.00$25.00$25.00$25.00$25.00$7.50$7.50$25.00$25.00Type2,Blue013.4”WhiteEdgeofRoadline(FOG)LinearFoot960.00$15.00$14,400.00$0.60$576.00$0.57$547.20$1.50$1,440.00$0.65$624.00014.ErosionandSedimentControlLumpSum1.00$6,000.00$6,000.00$1,400.00$1,400.00$2,000.00$2,000.00$500.00$500.00$1,000.00$1,000.00015.FinishandCleanUpLumpSum1.00$4,000.00$4,000.00$1,400.00$1,400.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$500.00$500.00$2,000.00$2,000.00TotalSchedule“B”$132,319.00$93,544.00$70,192.20$76,377.50$104,054.007b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015 for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay Page 8 of 24
CityofRentonBIDDATE:May27,2014EngineersEstimateItemDescriptionUnitEat.UnitNo.QuantityPriceBidAmountContractor:UnitPriceLakeridgePavingCompany,LLCBidAmountLumpSumLumpSumTon1.001.0056.00Contractor:LakesideIndustries,Inc.Contractor:CemexIncContractor:MilesResources,CCCUnitBidUnitBidUnitBidPriceAmountPriceAmountPriceAmountSquareYard360.00Schedule“C”001.Mobilization002.ProjectTemporaryTrafficControl003.HMAClass1/2PG64-22For3’Overlay004.RemovingAsphaltConcretePavementbyColdPlaning3”ForHalfStreet005.RemoveConcreteSidewalk006.CementConcreteSidewalk007.4”RaisedPavementMarkerType1,Yellow008.4”RaisedPavementMarkerType2d,Yellow009.ErosionandSedimentControl010.FinishandCleanUp$30,000.00$35,000.00$85.00$10.50$70.00$70.00$15.00$20.0050.0050.0028.004.00$3,600.00$9,200.00$92.50$17.50$53.00$56.16$20.00$20.00$700.00$700.00SquareYardSquareYardEachEachLumpSumLumpSum$30,000.00$35,000.00$4,760.00$3,780.00$3,500.00$3,500.00$420.00$80.00$3,500.00$8,000.00$92,540.00$71,230.23$132,319.00$92,540.00$12,570.31$952,659.54$3,600.00$9,200.00$5,180.00$6,300.00$2,650.00$2,808.00$560.00$80.00$700.00$700.00$31,778.00$736,352.63$93,544.00$31,778.00$8,886.68$870,561.31$5,000.00$5,000.00$2,175.00$2,175.00$7,000.00$7,000.00$5,000.00$5,000.00$3,000.00$3,000.00$3,000.00$3,000.00$130.00$7,280.00$200.00$11,200.00$135.00$7,560.00$5.00$1,800.00$25.00$9,000.00$25.00$9,000.00$50.00$2,500.00$43.00$2,150.00$33.50$1,675.00$60.00$3,000.00$111.00$5,550.00$100.00$5,000.00$20.00$560.00$7.50$210.00$20.00$560.00$20.00$80.00$7.50$30.00$20.00$80.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$500.00$500.00$1,000.00$1,000.00$500.00$500.00$500.00$500.00$2,000.00$2,000.00$26,720.00$34,315.00$36,875.00$811,495.40$826,261.12$958,245.60$70,192.20$76,377.50$104,054.00$26,720.00$34,315.00$36,875.00$6,668.26$7,255.86$9,885.13$915,075.86$944,209.49$1,109,059.731.00$3,500.001.00$8,000.00TotalSchedule“C”SubtotalSchedule“A”TotalSchedule“B”TotalSchedule“C”9.5%SalesTaxonSch“B”onlyTotalSchedules“A”,“B”and“C”7b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015 for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay Page 9 of 24
Project: 2015 Street Patch and Overlay with Curb Ramps
CAG‐15‐081
Date: 05/27/15
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
1 of 1
Bid Total from
Bid Prop. Bid Non‐Ack of Rec. Schedule of Prices
Form & Sig Bond Collusion of Addenda *Includes Sales Tax
CEMEX
PO Box 2037
1 Everett x x x x $944,209.49
WA
98213
Lakeridge Paving Company, LLC
PO Box 8500
2 Covington x x x x $870,561.31
WA
98042
Lakeside Industries ‐ Kent Division
18808 SE 257th St.
3 Covington x x x x $915,075.86
WA
98042
Miles Resources, LLC
400 Valley Ave. NE
4 Puyallup x x x x $1,109,059.73
WA
98372
Bidder
FORMS
Engineer's Estimate $952,659.547b. - City Clerk reports bid opening on 5/27/2015
for CAG-15-081 – 2015 Street Patch and Overlay Page 10 of 24
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Subject/Title:
COURT CASE: Marinoff vs. City of Renton, et al.;
CRT-15-004
Meeting:
REGULAR COUNCIL - 08 Jun 2015
Exhibits:
A. Summons & Complaint
Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board:
City Clerk
Staff Contact:
Jason Seth, City Clerk, ext. 6502
Recommended Action:
Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required: $ N/A Transfer Amendment: $N/A
Amount Budgeted: $ N/A Revenue Generated: $N/A
Total Project Budget: $ N/A City Share Total Project: $ N/A
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
5/29/2015 - Summons filed by Stephanie Marinoff, represented by Froehling Law Office vs. the City of
Renton, et al.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
7c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-
15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 11 of 24
CITYOFRENTON117MAY292015‘2RECEIVED3CITYCLERKSOFFICE4(q1567INTHESUPERIORCOURTOFTHESTATEOFWASHINGTON8INANDFORTHECOUNTYOFKING9STEPHANIEMARTNOFF10P1aintiflNO.11vs.SUMMONS12CITYOFKENT,CITYOFAUBURN,CITYOFFEDERALWAY,CITYOFRENTON,13CITYOFTUKWILAandPORTOFSEATTLE,14Defendants.15TOTHEDEFENDANTS1617Alawsuithasbeenstartedagainstyouintheabove-entitledcourtbythePlaintiff.18Plaintiffsclaimisstatedinthewrittencomplaint,acopyofwhichisservedonyouwiththis19Summons.20Inordertodefendagainstthislawsuit,youmustrespondtothecomplaintbystating21yourdefenseinwriting,andserveacopyuponthepersonsigningthissummonswithin20days22afiertheserviceofthissummons,excludingthedayofservice,oradefaultjudgmentmaybe23renderedagainstyouwithoutnotice.AdefaultjudgmentisonewherePlaintiffisentitledto2425SUMMONS-1FroehlingLawOffice122EastStewartAve.Puyallup,Washington98372(253)770-0116SCANNEE7c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 12 of 24
1whatsheasksforbecauseyouhavenotresponded.IfthissummonsisservedoutsidetheState2ofWashingtonyouhave60dayswithinwhichtorespond.IfyouserveaNoticeofAppearanceontheundersignedpersonyouareentitledtonoticebeforeadefaultjudgmentmay4berendered.56YoumaydemandthatthePlaintifffilethislawsuitwiththecourt.Ifyoudoso,thedemandmustbeinwritingandmustbeserveduponthepersonsigningthissummons.Within$14daysafteryouservethedemand,thePlaintiffmustfilethislawsuitwiththecourt,orthe9serviceonyouofthissummonsandcomplaintwillbevoid.10Ifyouwishtoseektheadviceofanattorneyinthismatter,youshoulddosopromptlysothatyourwrittenresponse,ifany,maybeservedontime.12ThisSummonsisissuedpursuanttoRule4oftheSuperiorCourtCivilRulesofthe1314StateofWashington.15DATEDthis26thdayofMay,2015.1$19AttorneyforPlaintiff202122232425SUMMONS.-2FroefflingLawOffice122EastStewartAve.Puyallup,Washington98372(253)770-01167c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 13 of 24
23456TNTHESUPERIORCOURTOFTHESTATEOFWASHINGTONINANDFORTHECOUNTYOFKING7STEPHANIEMARINOFF)8)NO.P1aintiff)9)vs.)COMPLAINTFORDAMAGES10)CITYOFKENT,CITYOFAUBURN,)iiCITYOFFEDERALWAY,CITYOF)RENTON,CITYOFTUKWILAandPORT)12OFSEATTLE,)Defendants.)13___________________________________________14PARTIES151.PlaintiffStephanieMarinoffresidesinKingCounty,Washington.162.DefendantCityofKentisamunicipalcorporationprovidingservicesinpart17throughtheKentPoliceDepartment.183.DefendantCityofAuburnisamunicipalcorporationprovidingservicesinpart19throughtheAuburnPoliceDepartment.204.DefendantCityofFederalWayisamunicipalcorporationprovidingservicesin21partthroughtheFederalWayPoliceDepartment.225.DefendantCityofRentonisamunicipalcorporationprovidingserviceseinpart23throughtheRentonPoliceDepartment.246.DefendantCityofTukwilaisamunicipalcorporationprovidingservicesinpart25throughtheTukwilaPoliceDepartment.26FR0EIIUNGLAWOFFICE122EAsTSTEwTAVETm1PUYALLUP,WASHINGTON98372J1v1rLru11I-PHONE(253)770-0116SCANNEE7c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 14 of 24
y7.DefendantPortofSeattleisamunicipalcorporationlocatedintheStateof2ashington.8.AllDefendantsprovideofficersformembershipontheValleySWATteam.4JURISDICTIONANDVENUE9.ThepartiesresideinKingCounty,Washington.610.TheincidentthatisthesubjectofthislitigationoccurredinKingCounty,Washington.8JurisdictionandvenueareproperinKingCountySuperiorCourt.9FACTS1012.OnMay16,2012,OfficerD.YagioftheKentPoliceDepartmentreceivedinformationfromananonymoussourcethatawantedfelon,BlakeBellecourt,wasstayingat12PlaintiffMarinoffshomelocatedat4812South288thStreet,Auburn,Washington.1313.OnMay17,2012,twodetectiveswiththeKentPoliceDepartmentbegantowatch14Ms.Marinoffshome.1514.Atapproximately8:16p.m.,oneofthedetectivesobservedamanmatchingMr.16Bellecourt’sdescriptionexitavehicleandwalktowardsthenorthsideofMs.Marinoffs17home.1815.Overthenexttwohours,thetwodetectivesobservedmultiplepeoplecomeandgo19fromtheresidence.2016.Duringthattime,Mr.Bellecourtlefttheresidence,tellingtheresidentsinsidethe21homethathewasgoingforawalk.2217.WhileMr.Bellecourtwasawayfromtheresidence,atapproximately10p.m.,a23contingentofmarkedpoliceofficers,K-9units,andaKCSOGuardian1helicopter24surroundedMs.Marinoffshome.2518.Usingapatrolvehiclepublicaddresssystem,anofficerwiththeKentPolice26Departmentorderedeverybodyinsidethehometocomeoutwiththeirhandsup.FROEHuNGLAWOFFICE122EASTSTEWARTAvECOMPLAINT2PUYALLUP,WASHINGTON98372-PHoNE(253)770-01167c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 15 of 24
119.Usingapatrolvehiclepublicaddresssystem,anofficerwiththeKentPolice2DepartmentorderedMr.Bellecourttoexitthehome.SinceMr.Bellecourtwasnotinthe3home,hedidnotcomplywiththeofficers’order.420.Ms.Marinoff,aswellastherestofthepeopleinsidethehome,compliedwiththe5officers’orders.621.Uponlearningthereasonthattheofficersweresurroundingherresidence,Ms.7MarinoffinformedtheofficersthatMr.Bellecourtwasnolongerinherresidence.822.Becausetheofficersdidnotbelieveher,Ms.Marinoffinvitedtheofficerstosearch9theinsideofherhome.1023.TheofficersrefusedMs.Marinoffsinvitation.Instead,theofficersorderedMs.iiMarinoffandtheotherpersonspresenttogotoagasstationapproximatelyoneblockaway.1224.Ms.Marinoff,aswellastheotherpersonsinsidethehome,complied.1325.Atapproximately11:00p.m.,OfficerJDJohnsonoftheKentPoliceDepartment,14authoredasearchwarrantforMs.Marinoffshome,whichwasapprovedbyaprosecuting15attorneyandsignedbyajudge.1626.Oncetheofficershadobtainedasearchwarrant,theydeployednumerousnoise17flashdistractiondevicesinboththerearandfrontyardtoensureMr.Bellecourt’sattention.1827.Next,theofficersdeployeda37milimeterbatonroundthroughabasementwindow19toattractMr.Bellecourt’sattentionandencouragecompliance.2028.SinceMr.Bellecourtwasnotinthehome,hedidnotexitthehome.2129.TheofficersestablishedacommandpostinthenorthparkinglotoftheLDSchurch22immediatelytothenorthofMs.Marinoffshome.Theycutapadlockonametalgatetogain23accesstothenorthlot.2430.InthecourseofcontainingandclearingMs.Marinoffisyard,theofficerscutdown25Ms.Marinoffschainlengthfencesothattheycouldaccessthehomewithanarmoredtruck.26FROEHUNGLAWOFFICE122EASTSTEWARTAvECOMP’A2PUYALLUP,WASH[NGTON98372PH0NE(253)770-01167c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 16 of 24
131.TheofficersshotoutastreetlightintheLDSlottoprovideconcealmentto2membersoftheValleySWATteam.332.TheofficersknockeddownthefenceinfrontofMs.Marinoffshomesothatthey4couldaccessitwithasecondarmoredtruckandprovidevisibilityforpoliceunits.533.NegotiatorscontinuouslytriedtohailMr.Bellecourtusingapublicaddresssystem,6utbecausehewasnotinthehome,hedidnotcomplywiththeofficers’demands.734.TheofficersusedexplosivedevicestobreachthebasementdoorandshotOCand8CSgasintothehomeinseveralvolleys.ThesevolleysbrokemostofthewindowsinMs.9Marinoffshome.1035.Theofficersthendeployedrobotsintothehome,whichdidnotlocateMr.11BellecourtbecauseMr.Bellecourtwasnotinthehome.1236.Next,policeK-9unitsenteredthehome.Theybreachedtheceilingtogainaccess13totheatticofthehome.1437.BecauseMr.Bellecourtwasnotinthehome,theofficersdidnotarresthim.15DEFENDANTS’TRESPASSANDI1%TENTIONALTRESPASS1638.TheDefendantsareliablefortrespassandintentionaltrespassinthatthey17committedwillfulandwantondestructiontoMs.Marinoffshomeduringthecourseof18searchingit.MsMarinoffhadtherighttoexclusivepossessionofherhome,theactionsofthe19Defendantswereintentional,itwasforseeablethatbydamagingthehome,MsMarinoffs’20possessoryinterestwouldbedisturbedandtherewasactualandsubstantialdamage.2139.TheDefendantsareliablefortrespassandintentionaltrespassinthattheyusedan22amountofforcewhollyunnecessarytoaccomplishthetaskathand.Theofficerscouldhave23simplyacceptedMs.Marinoffsinvitationtoenterthehomethroughtheopendoortosearch24forMr.Bellecourt.TheDefendants’actionswereunreasonableandnotnecessaryandwere25thesolecauseforthedamagetoMs.Marinoffsproperty.Inexecutingthewarrantinthe26mannertheydid,theDefendantswerenegligentandcausedfarmoredamagethanwasFR0EHUNGLAWOFFICE122EASTSTEWARTAVEPUYALLUP,WASHINGTON98372jiviPLAINTtPHONE(253)770-01167c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 17 of 24
1necessaryorappropriateunderthecircumstances.Therewasnorequirementthatthe2warrantbeexecutedinthemannerinwhichitwas.furtheritwasnegligentforthe3DefendantstorelyontheobservationofofficerstodeterminethatBellecourtwaspresent4andjustifyasearchwarrant,yetnotconductsuchobservationwithsufficientprecautionso5astoobserveBellecourtexittheresidenceinthesamemannerinwhichheenteredit.6DAMAGES740.AsadirectandproximateresultoftheDefendants’intentionaltrespass,Plaintiff$Marinoffsuffereddamagesinanamounttobeprovenattrialincluding,butnotlimitedto,9propertydamagetoPlaintiffMarinoffshome,emotionaldistress,andlossofenjoymentof10life.11WHEREFORE,Plaintiffpraysforreliefasfollows:121.ForjudgmenttobeenteredagainsttheDefendantsinanamounttobeprovenatthe13timeoftrialincluding,butnotlimitedto,anamountsufficienttocompensatePlaintifffor14damagesdescribedherein,152.Forcostsanddisbursementsincurredasauthorizedbystatuteorcourtrule,163.Forreasonableattorney’sfeesasallowedbylaw,and174.Forsuchotherandfurtherreliefasthecourtdeemsjustandequitableunderthe18circumstances.19DATEDthis26thdayofMay,2015.21ANTONIH.FROEHLING,WSBA827122AttorneyforPlaintiff23242526fRoEHLnGLAWOFFICE122EASTSTEWARTAvECMPLAfl%TPUYALLUP,WASHINGTON98372I-PHONE(253)770-01167c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 18 of 24
STATEOFWASHINGTON)Countyof__________)2v14‘t,beingfirstdulyswornonoath,deposesand3says:Iambneoftheplaintiffsintheabovematter,thatIhavereadtheforegoingdocument,knowthecontentsthereofandbelievethesametobetrue.7SUBSCRIBEDANDSWORNtobeforemethisL’_dayofMay,2015.89ARPUBLICinajdfortheStateofWashingtonresidingat-tvL/tP/10MyCommissionExpires:3—ic—-111213141516171$1920212223242526FR0EHUNGLAWOFFICE122EASTSTEWARTAvELPuyALLUP,WAsHII1oTox98372..,MPiA1NT-PHoNE(253)770-01167c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 19 of 24
INTHESUPERIORCOURTOFTHESTATEOFWASHINGTONINANI)FORTHECOUNTYOFKINGSTEPHANIEMAR11’.OFfNO.15-2-12702-1KNTPlaintifls),ORDERSETTINGCIVILCASESCHEDULEvs.ASSIGNEDJUDGE:Dawas,Andrea,Dept.23CITYOFKENT,CITYOFAUBURN,CITYOFFEDERALFILEDDATE:5/26/2015WAY,CITYOFRENTON,CITYTRIALDATE:5/23/2016OFTUKWILA,PORTOFSCOMISCODE:*ORSCS$EATFLERespondent(s)AcivilcasehasbeenfiledintheKingCountySuperiorCourtandwillbemanagedbytheCaseScheduleonPage3asorderedbytheKingCountySuperiorCourtPresidingJudge.LNOTICFSNOTICETOPLAINTiFF:ThePlaintiffmayserveacopyofthisOrderSettingCaseSchedule(Schedule)ontheDefendant(s)alongwiththeSummonsandComplaint/Petition.Otherwise,thePlaintiffshallservetheScheduleontheDefendant(s)within10daysafterthelaterof:(1)thefilingoftheSummonsandComplaint/Petitionor(2)serviceoftheDefendant’sfirstresponsetotheComplaint/Petition,whetherthatresponseisaNoticeofAppearance,aresponse,oraCivilRule12(CR12)motion.TheSchedulemaybeservedbyregularmail,withproofofmailingtobefiledpromptlyintheformrequiredbyCivilRule5(CR5).“1understandthatIamrequiredtogiveacopyofthesedocumentstoallpartiesinthiscase.”PRINTNAMESIGNNAME7c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 20 of 24
LNOTICES(continued)NOTICETOALLPARTIES:AllattorneysandpartiesshouldmakethemselvesfamiliarwiththeKingCountyLocalRules[KCLCRJ—especiallythosereferredtointhisSchedule.InordertocomplywiththeSchedule,itwillbenecessatyforattorneysandpartiestopursuetheircasesvigorouslyfromthedaythecaseisfiled.Forexample,discoverymustbeundertakenpromptlyinordertocomplywiththedeadlinesforjoiningadditionalparties,claims,anddefenses,fordisclosingpossiblewitnesses[SeeKCLCR26],andformeetingthediscoverycutoffdate[SeeKCLCR37(g)].CROSSCLAIMS,COUNTERCLAIMSANDTHIRDPARTYCOMPLAINTS:Afilingfeeof$240mustbepaidwhenanyanswerthatincludesadditionalclaimsisfiledinanexistingcase.KCLCR4.2(a)(2)AConfirmationofJoinder,ClaimsandDefensesoraStatementofArbitrabilitymustbefiledbythedeadlineintheschedule.Thecourtwillreviewtheconfirmationofjoinderdocumenttodetermineifahearingisrequired.IfaShowCauseorderisissued,allpartiescitedintheordermustappearbeforetheirChiefCivilJudge.Pfl’1DINGDUEDATESCANCELEDBYFILINGPAPERSTHATRESOLVETHECASE:Whenafinaldecree,judgment,ororderofdismissalofallpartiesandclaimsisfiledwiththeSuperiorCourtClerk’sOffice,andacourtesycopydeliveredtotheassignedjudge,allpendingduedatesinthisScheduleareautomaticallycanceled,includingthescheduledTrialDate.Itistheresponsibilityofthepartiesto1)filesuchdispositivedocumentswithin45daysoftheresolutionofthecase,and2)strikeanypendingmotionsbynoti1jingthebailifftotheassignedjudge.PartiesmayalsoauthorizetheSuperiorCourttostrikeallpendingduedatesandtheTrialDatebyfilingaNoticeofSettlementpursuanttoKCLCR41,andforwardingacourtesycopytotheassignedjudge.Ifafinaldecree,judgmentororderofdismissalofallpartiesandclaimsisnotfiledby45daysafteraNoticeofSettle,nent,thecasemaybedismissedwithnotice.IfyoumissyourscheduledTrialDate,theSuperiorCourtClerkisauthorizedbyKCLCR41(b)(2)(A)topresentanOrderofDismissal,withoutnotice,forfailuretoappearatthescheduledTrialDate.NOTICESOFAPPEARANCEORWITHDRAWALANDADDRESSCHANGES:Allpartiestothisactionnmstkeepthecourtinformedoftheiraddresses.WhenaNoticeofAppearance/WithdrawalorNoticeofChangeofAddressisfiledwiththeSuperiorCourtClerk’sOffice,partiesmustprovidetheassignedjudgewithacourtesycopy.ARBITRATIONFILINGANDTRIALDENOVOPOSTARBITRATIONFEE:AStatementofArbitrabilitymustbefiledbythedeadlineonthescheduleifthecaseissubjecttomandatoryarbitrationandserviceoftheoriginalcomplaintandallanswerstoclaims,counterclaimsandcross-claimshavebeenfiled.Ifmandatoryarbitrationisrequiredafterthedeadline,partiesmustobtainanorderfromtheassignedjudgetransferringthecasetoarbitration.AnypartyfilingaStatementmustpaya$220arbitrationfee.Ifapartyseeksatrialdenovowhenanarbitrationawardisappealed,afeeof$250andtherequestfortrialdenovomustbefiledwiththeClerk’sOfficeCashiers.NOTICEOFNON-COMPLIANCEFEES:AllpartieswillbeassessedafeeauthorizedbyKingCountyCode4A.630.020whenevertheSuperiorCourtClerkmustsendnoticeofnon-complianceofschedulerequirementsand/orLocalCivilRule41.KingCountyLocalRulesareavailableforvieiingatwv.kincounty.gov/courts/clerk.7c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 21 of 24
ILCASESCHEDULETCASEEVENTSDATECaseFliedandScheduleIssued.5/26/20151LastDayforFilingStatementofArbitrabilitywithoutaShowingofGoodCauseforLateFiling[See11/3/2015KCLMAR2.I(a)andNoticesonpage2].$22OArbitrafionfeemustbepaidVDEADLINEtofileConfirmationofJoinderifnotsubjecttoArbitration[SeeKCLCR4.2(a)and11/3/2015Noticesonpage2]DEADLINEforHearingMotionstoChangeCaseAssignmentArea[KCLCR82(e)]11/17/2015DEADLINEforDisclosureofPossiblePrimaryWitnesses[SeeKCLCR26(b)]12/21/2015DEADLINEforDisclosureofPossibleAdditionalWitnesses[KCLCR26(b)]2/1/2016DEADLINEforJuryDemand[SeeKCLCR38(b)(2)]2/16/2016DEADLINEforChangeinTrialDate[SeeKCLCR40(e)(2)]2/16/2016DFADLINEforDiscoveryCutoff[SeeKCKCR37(g)]4/4/2016DFADLINEforEngaginginAlternativeDisputeResolution[SeeKCLCR16(b)]4/25/2016DEADLINEforExchangeWitness&ThthibitLists&DocumentaryExhibits[SeeKCLCR4(j)]5/3/2016TDE4DLINEtofileJointConfirmationofTrialReadiness[SeeKCLCR16(a)(1)]5/3/2016DEADLINEforHearingDispositivePretrialMotions[SeeKCLCR56;CRS6J5/9/2016TJointStatementofEvidence[SeeKCLCR4(k)]5/16/2016DEADLINEforfilingTrialBriefs,ProposedfindingsofFactandConclusionsofLawandJury5/16/2016Instnictions(DonotfileproposedFindingsoffactandConclusionofLawwiththeClerk)TrialDate[SeeKCLCR40]5/23/2016The‘indicatesadocumentthatmustbefiledwiththeSuperiorCourtClerksOfficebythedateshownfitORDERPursuanttoKingCountyLocalRule4[KCLCR4],ITISORDEREDthatthepartiesshallcomplywiththeschedulelistedabove.Penalties,includingbutnotlimitedtosanctionssetforthinLocalRule4(g)andRule37oftheSuperiorCourtCivilRules,maybeimposedfornon-compliance.ItisFURTHERORDEREDthatthepartyfilingthisactionservethisOrderSettingCivilCaseScheduleandattachmentonallotherparties.DATED:5/26/2015_________________________________PRESIDINGJUDGE7c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 22 of 24
W.ORDFRONCWILPROCEEDINGSFORASSIGNMENTTOJUDGERFADTHISORDERBEFORECONTACTINGYOURASSIGNEDJUDGLThiscaseisassignedtotheSuperiorCourtJudgewhosenameappearsinthecaptionofthiscaseschedule.TheassignedSuperiorCourtJudgewillpresideoverandmanagethiscaseforallpretrialmatters.COMPLEXLITIGATION:Ifyouanticipateanunusuallycomplexorlengthytrial,pleasenotii’theassignedcourtassoonaspossible.APPLICABLERULES:Exceptasspecificallymodifiedbelow,alltheprovisionsofKingCountyLocalCivilRules4through26shallapplytotheprocessingofcivilcasesbeforeSuperiorCourtJudges.Thelocalcivilrulescanbefoundathttp.Ilwww.kingcounty.gov/courts/supenorcourt/civil.aspx.CASESCHEDULEANDREQumEMENTS:Deadlinesaresetbythecaseschedule,issuedpursuanttoLocalCivilRule4.THEPAJU1ESARERESPONSIBLEFORKNOWINGANDCOMPLYINGWiTHALLDFADLINESIMPOSEDBYTHECOURT’SLOCALCiVILRILES.A.JointConfirmationregardingTrialReadinessReport:Nolaterthantwentyone(21)daysbeforethetrialdate,partiesshallcompleteandfile(withacopytotheassignedjudge)ajointconfirmationreportsettingforthwhetherajulydemandhasbeenfiled,theexpecteddurationofthetrial,whetherasettlementconferencehasbeenheld,andspecialproblemsandneeds(e.g.interpreters,equipment,etc.).Theformisavailableathttp://www.kingcounty.gov/courts/superiorcourt.aspx.IfpartieswishtorequestaCR16conference,theymustcontacttheassignedcourt.Plaintiffs/petitioner’scounselisresponsibleforcontactingtheotherpartiesregardingsaidreport.B.SetflementlMediafion/ADRa.fortyfive(45)daysbeforethetrialdate,counselforplaintiffipetitionershallsubmitawrittensettlementdemand.Ten(10)daysafterreceivingplaintiffs/petitioner’swrittendemand,counselfordefendant/respondentshallrespond(withacounteroffer,ifappropriate).b.Twentyeight(28)daysbeforethetrialdate,aSettlement/Mediation/ADRconferenceshallhavebeenheld.FAILURETOCOMPLYWITHTHISSETTLEMENTCONFERENCEREQUIREMENTMAYRESULTINSANCTIONS.C.Trial:Trialisscheduledfor9:00am.onthedateonthecasescheduleorassoonthereafterasconvenedbythecourt.TheFridaybeforetrial,thepartiesshouldaccesstheKingCountySuperiorCourtwebsitehttp.//wwwkingcounty.gov/courts/superiorcourt.aspxtoconfirmtrialjudgeassignment.Informationcanalsobeobtainedbycalling(206)205-5984.MOTIONSPROCEDURESA.NotingofMotionsDispositiveMotions:Allsummaryjudgmentorotherdispositivemotionswillbeheardwithoralargumentbeforetheassignedjudge.Themovingpartymustarrangewiththehearingjudgeadateandtimeforthehearing,consistentwiththecourtrules.LocalCivilRule7andLocalCivilRule56governproceduresforsummaryjudgmentorothermotionsthatdisposeofthecaseinwholeorinpart.Thelocalcivilrulescanbefoundathttp://wwrv.kingcountv.gov/courts/superiorcourt/civil.aspx.Non-dispositiveMotions:Thesemotions,whichincludediscoverymotions,willberuledonbytheassignedjudgewithoutoralargument,unlessotherwiseordered.Allsuchmotionsmustbenotedforadatebywhichtherulingisrequested;thisdatemustlikewiseconformtotheapplicablenoticerequirements.Ratherthannotingatimeofday,theNoteforMotionshouldstatecWithoutOralArgument.”LocalCivilRule7governsthesemotions,whichincludediscoverymotions.Thelocalcivilrulescanbefoundathtt.//www.kinucountv.ov/courts/superiorcourt/civil.aspx.7c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 23 of 24
MotionsinFamilyLawCasesnotinvolvingchildren:Discoverymotionstocompel,motionsinlimine,motionsrelatingtotrialdatesandmotionstovacatejudgments/dismissalsshallbebroughtbeforetheassignedjudge.AllothermotionsshouldbenotedandheardonthefamilyLawMotionscalendar.LocalCivilRule7andKingCountyfamilyLawLocalRulesgoverntheseprocedures.Thelocalrulescanbefoundathttp://wwwkincounty.gov/courts/suieriorcourt/civil.aspx.EmergencyMotions:Underthecourt’slocalcivilrules,emergencymotionswillbeallowedonlyuponentryofanOrderShorteningTime.However,emergencydiscoverydisputesmaybeaddressedbytelephonecallandwithouttwittenmotion,ifthejudgeapproves.B.OriginalDocuments/WorkingCopies!FilingofDocuments:AlloriginaldocumentsmustbefiledwiththeClerk’sOffice.PleaseseeinformationontheClerk’sOfficewebsiteatwwwkingcounty.gov/courts/clerkregardingthenewrequirementoutlinedinLGR30thatattorneysmuste-filedocumentsinKingCountySuperiorCourt.Theexceptionstothec-filingrequirementarealsoavailableontheClerk’sOfficewebsite.Theworkingcopiesofalldocumentsinsupportoroppositionmustbemarkedontheupperrightcornerofthefirstpagewiththedateofconsiderationorhearingandthenameoftheassignedjudge.Theassignedjudge’sworkingcopiesmustbedeliveredtohis/hercourtroomortheJudges’mailroom.WorkingcopiesofmotionstobeheardontheFamilyLawMotionsCalendarshouldbefiledwiththefamilyLawMotionsCoordinator.OnJune1,2009youwillbeabletosubmitworkingcopiesthroughtheClerk’sofficeE-filingapplicationatwww.kingcounty.gov/courts/clerk.Serviceofdocuments:E-fileddocumentsmaybeelectronicallyservedonpartieswhooptintoE-ServicewithintheF-Filingapplication.Thefilermuststillserveanyotherswhoareentitledtoservicebutwhohavenotoptedin.E-Servicegeneratesarecordofservicedocumentthatcanbec-filed.PleaseseeinformationontheClerk’sofficewebsiteatwww.kincounty.gov!courts/clerkregardingF-Service.OriginalProposedOrder:Eachofthepartiesmustincludeanoriginalproposedordergrantingrequestedreliefwiththeworkingcopymaterialssubmittedonanymotion.DonotfiletheoriginaloftheproposedorderwiththeClerkoftheCourt.Shouldanypartydesireacopyoftheorderassignedandfiledbythejudge,apre-addressed,stampedenvelopeshallaccompanytheproposedorder.PresentationofOrders:Allorders,agreedorotherwise,mustbepresentedtotheassignedjudge.Ifthatjudgeisabsent,contacttheassignedcourtforfurtherinstructions.Ifanotherjudgeentersanorderonthecase,counselisresponsibleforprovidingtheassignedjudgewithacopy.Proposedordersfinalizingsettlementand/ordismissalbyagreementofallpartiesshallbepresentedtotheassignedjudgeorintheExParteDepartment.FormalproofinFamilyLawcasesmustbescheduledbeforetheassignedjudgebycontactingthebaiifiorformalproofmaybeenteredintheFxParteDepartment.iffinalorderand/orformalproofareenteredintheIIParteDepartment,counselisresponsibleforprovidingtheassignedjudgewithacopy.C.FormMemoranda/briefsformattersheardbytheassignedjudgemaynotexceedtwentyfour(24)pagesfordispositivemotionsandtwelve(12)pagesfornon-dispositivemotions,unlesstheassignedjudgepermitsover-lengthmemoranda/briefsinadvanceoffiling.Over-lengthmemoranda/briefsandmotionssupportedbysuchmemoranda/briefsmaybestricken.ITISSOORDEREDFAILUREToCOMPLYWITHTHEPROVISIONSOfTHISORDERMAYRESULTINDISMISSALOROTHERSANCTIONS.PLAINTIFF/PEITITONERSHALLFORWARDACOPYOFTHISORDERASSOONASPRACTICABLETOANYPARTYWHOHASNOTRECEIVEDTHISORDER.PRFSUMNGJUDGE7c. - Court case filed by Stephanie Marinoff, CRT-15-004, represented by Froehling Law Office, vs. Page 24 of 24