Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-178 - Vol 4 .
• 0/1— rn
Form 81
S W '
Affidavit of Publication
f -- 1--beit
-?r?f
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. •
COUNTY OF KING, •
C. BELL being duly 'sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company,
---- ---- -- publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a -daily-newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King.......- --- -- -
County,State of Washington;that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State;that
it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court.of King County; that the
annexed, being a Retail ad , was published in said newspaper, and not in a
SoorA/ Zie '16
supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the reg nd ewe issue of
•
said paper on the following day or days April 23 , 1980 Ordinance N o . 3 415
Soure/ Zon/E
---- -and that_the said newspaper-was-regularly-distributed--to-its^subscribers during-all of--said-period..- —
CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON .
=- ORDINANCE NO.3415
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REN- '- , -
----- TON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE_.__.-______ ,r
ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN e;,", �//�
PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF' :.'\'•- • 0
RENTON FROM HEAVY INDUSTRIAL `.1 - ••'•.•
• .DISTRICT(H-1)TO RESIDENCE SINGLE ,(w` l•`I•6 E , ' ;V
- FAMILY DISTRICT(R•1) �' - ,
WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building 1 Gr••h Say 413 �,':k'
`''Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the p Subscribed and sworn to before me this Twenty,_S..a ria3, ,�,d.' • 'ktaV _ .
"Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" �•
os amended,and the mops and reports adopted In of May - 17 8 0 �' 3"1
canlunction therewith, the property hereinbelow ' 7 T
descrIbed has heretofore been zoned as Heavy /'� •
//� • �' •
Industrial District(H-1);and s (/�� „�. o 2. ti
WHEREAS a_Proper petition for change of zone �•M t ° ..
• Classification of said property has been filed with the. `� V 1.
• Planning Deportment on or about September 7,1978, No,[�� �•k!
=_wnlch petition was duly referred to the Hearing r�'1 Pab In and ?.lfie• ttlelr'of�VHashloglon
"-.-Examiner for investigation,study and aublic hear- z71)Idlnq al ''t30attS
ing,and a public hearing having been held thereon' .' . ` . ' . '" .
•
on or about September 26, 1978, and'said matter •
-.-having been appealed to the City Council and the -
•r_City Council having affirmed the Hearing Exomin- _ _ _ . _ _ _ __ _
:,.er's decision, and said zoning request being in '
**''`conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan,as ' -- - •.- -
:4-amended,and the City Council having duly consist-
-- ered all matters relevant thereto and all parties w - - ---- _ _ --- --- - - - .-• _
having been heard appearing in support hereof or in "i - - �T"�' �•� 'L
apposition thereto,NOW THEREFORE _ ^_ _ . - -- -- - . - ,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REN- - -' - . - - _, - -. _ - - ._ - .
TON,WASHINGTON,DOORDAIN'AS FOLLOWS: - - - -. • "'
SECTION I: The following described property in _- _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - - _- __. -
t•t.the City.of Renton Is hereby rezoned to Residence .. -- - --- . . .. - -
'Single Family District (R-1)as hereinbelow speck • •
.
.fled; 'sublect the the findings, conclusions and - - • -
3• decision dated October 23, 1978; the Planning E _ _ - - - _- _ __ - _ - _
{ Director is hereby authorized and directed to change 1 - _ - .- - - - .
the maps of the Zoning Ordinance,as amended,to ! _ - ' _
I'evidence said zoning,to-wit: - - .. ' --
See Exhibit"A"attached hereto and made a •
"1.
. part hereof as if fully set forth herein -
'- . (Said ProPertY being located at east of the __ - _ - - - .-
Existing Renton Hill single family residence _ - _ - - - -- - - -
••' neighborhood and north of South 7th Street t- _• .. ..
In o northeasterly direction to the center of • - - -mow - -
1 • the Cedar River) -. - �, - :9. ���~ �����-- -. - -�
i SECTION II This Ordinance shall,be effective - -f. - _ /
upon its Passage, approval and five days after Its I _ ' 4- -- t;'� II4
publication.' _ -.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 15th Day of - - - - J
1 Delores A.Mead,Cliv Clerk ' - - --_
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 15th day o1 -�--- _ _ .. _ _ __-- _ _, - -
..April,1980. .� .- - - - - .
1 : Barbara Y.Shinpoch,Mayor- - ' ' '
▪ Approved as to form: _ - ... . --- - - - .___-
Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney •
.,Dote of Publication:April 23,1980 -
•
Form 81
•
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON, _• .
COUNTY OF KING,
C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company,
publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King
County,State of Washington;that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State;that
it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the
annexed, being A Retail Ad , was published in said newspaper, and not in a
So OW Zed E
supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the u1arand-zatire issue of
said paper on the following day or days April 23 , 1980 Ordinance No 3 4] 5
Soeinf Zip ii/E
and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to itsA subscribers during all of said period.
EXHIBIT"A" -' .'!'' ,
' ' ORDINANCE NO.3415- � (', , , /r~, '
'RENTON HILL REZONE - ! 7 1 f'• .!' '
_ R-219-78
THAT PORTION OF THE N.H.TOBIN DONATION
CLAIM NO. 37 LYING WITHIN THE SW V. OF, __
SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 Subscribed and sworn to before me this Twenty-Second da
_EAST,W.M.,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Y
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST COR-
NER
OF TRACT 32, PLAT =1 OF THE of May 1980
I
RENTON CO-OPERATIVE COAL COM-
PANY'S ACRE TRACTS, AS RECORDED - ,�/
IN VOLUME 9 OF PLATS, PAGE 29„ - " 1��j� K
. RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WA.,THEN ���777 (/, -
- NORTH 60 FEET, THENCE WEST 10 ' . Notary Public In onG for a State ct Washington
FEET, THENCE NORTH 85 FEET, • nuldlaP Seattle
'HENCE EAST 310 FEET, THENCE -- -
n. SOUTH 145 FEET, THENCE WEST 300 - '
- FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. - -
—
TRI/ds, jive'fivI7v-it).- K- /7 7-- -
frnit
„ PA-tA 7 .----,\(-0
;._'7.- - (\ci‘' ."),\‘ \\ - - • -
, t.regyrn
j 1`‘2.'43 t..ib ri.Si
vr .,..,=.1 -- , , rc) • al
'
" J NOV li 6197g
\, , , . 1 ,.. ....
1 .., ,,n.1„. -JJ • IA t,;#11 CO4N11 WM%
.____- -- • COUR I taws glift.f f '
2 -------
! .----
3
4
5 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY
6
TRANSAMERICA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, )
7 a California corporation, )
8 Plaintiff, ) NO. 838739
)
v.
9 ) STIPULATION AND ORDER
THE CITY OF RENTON,
) OF DISMISSAL
10
Defendant. )
11
12
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the
13 parties, by and through their counsel of record, that the above
14 entitled action be dismissed without prejudice and without costs
to any party.
15
DATED this 3( 1-rday of October, 1979.
16 SHIDLER, McBROOM, GATF & BALDWIN
17 By g . 1
James R. Irwin
1- 18 Attorney for Plaintiff
19 PAIN & REN -
20 1
ttoreelfoV-Dce3gfg Defendant
21
GOUGE, TH F ULL - ,
22 C
23 Robert E. McBeth
Attorney for Intervenors
24 ORDER
25 BASED UPON THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, it is hereby ordered
26 that the above entitled action be dismissed without prejudice and
27 without costs to any party. NOV 1 6 la
DONE IN OPEN COURT this day of , 1979 .
28 •
29 Presented by: COM' COMMISSIONER JUDGE
30 A/-7,iz,e---,
; James R. Irwin Constance L. Proctor
31 Copy r eived; nAbliirof presentation waived:
32 B alvtglAzifier /2- 44'
ni 1 ell?gl .. torneiy--- or 19e-tendant
1.-!?By / /1" (?5 V _
,c5,/
LAW OFFICES OF
R bert E. McBet , Attorney for Interve R.McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
WOO NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
' ,
i, ,
. . 173 - 73/
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON - - -
COUNTY OF KING ss. ,
— -CITY OF
A being first duly sworn on ORDINANCE NO.3264 City's Hearing Exam: i,nD
' ' AN ORDINANCE OF Planning Director�`s•here0V i
THE CITY OF RENTON, authorized and directed to
oath,deposes and says that..:'rh is the i;j(3. . `...tr of W A S H I N G T 0 N change the maps.of_the
• THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) CHANGING THE ZON- Zoning Ordinance, air '
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and , ING CLASSIFICATION amended,•to evidence said
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred OF CERTAIN PROPER- rezoning,to-wit: •
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- I TIES WITHIN THE CITY EXHIBIT "A" ON FILE IN
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, O F' RENTON FROM THE PUBLIC RECORDS,
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained GENERAL CLASSIFI-, CITY CLERK'S OFFICE j
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton CATION.DISTRICT (G) '(Said property located
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the TO TRAILER PARK(T)• approximately 1000 feet
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to wit,King County, - , (R-179-78) - south of N.E. 4th Street
WHEREAS under Chap- and adjacent to' Union
Washington.That the annexed is a (J1 ri.i..narica....1.26 . • ter 7,Title IV(Building Regu- Avenue S.E.and the ex-
lations) of Ordinance No. isting Leisure Estates i
1628 known as'the"Code of Mobile Home Park) I
General Ordinances of the AND SUBJECT FURTHER i!!1
City of Renton",,as amend- to that certain Declaration of I
ed, and the maps and re- Restrictive Covenants ex-
as it was published in regular issues(and ports adopted in conjunction ecuted by Petitioner-owners
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period therewith, the property on or about September 29,
hereinbelow described has 1978 and recorded in the
heretofore been zoned as -office of the Director of Re-
of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the General Classification Dis- cords and Elections,Receiv- j
trict(G);and ing No. 7810061020 and S ,
WHEREAS a proper peti- which said Covena.r'-:,o
.....e?1k...day of NOire t!'t)er ,19 78 ,and ending the ' tion for change of ,zone hereby incorporated and
classification of said proper- made a part hereof as if fully
' ty has been filed with the set forth.
Planning Department on or SECTION-II: This Ordi- `
day of ,19 both dates I about May 30, 1978 which nance shall be effective up-
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- ; petition was duly referred to on its passage,approval and
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee , the Hearing Examiner for five(5)days after its publica- j
s investigation, study and tion.
r ; public hearing,and a public' PASSED BY THE CITY y
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..5. :146which ' hearing having been held COUNCIL this 20fh day of
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the+, i thereon on or about June 27,. November, 1978
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent 11978, and said matter hay- Delores A. Mead
insertion. /� I ing been duly considered by City Clerk
a . d l�_ the Hearing Examiner and APPROVED BY THE 1
1 said zoning request being in MAYOR this 20th day of '
conformity with the City's November, 1978
�� ' Comprehensive Plan, as Charles J. Delaurenti, ,.
. cI-L r Clerk amended, and the City Mayor
Council having duly consi- Approved as to form:
2 dered all matters relevant Lawrence J.Warren
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of thereto, and all parties hay- City Attorney
ing been heard appearing in Published in_The Renton I
!love 111b' r 78 support thereof or in opposi- .Record-Chronicle Novemb-
19 tion thereto, NOW THERE, `er 24, 1978. R5251 I '
FORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF •
•••• ••• •• THE CITY OF RENTON, '
Notary Publ in nd fo a tete of Wash , WASHINGTON, DO OR-,,
44": residing at Kent, King Cou y. DAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 •
...• ?is•>- • - SECTION I:The following
,,, •.- '•'r• �� , Y described property in the
L►/:.. y� Cityof Renton is hereby
slature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June
:a, .,'' 'l rezoned to Trailer Park (T)
a '4Pli.k►„.° f. as hereinbelow specified;
egraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, subject to the findings,con-
. ' y •�lwspapers of the State. elusions and decision dated
� October 12, 1978 of the
V.P.C.Form No.87
47;12/tiP
te6 -
qog. ,s�ulnes Ierapaa,,.apisas0A4
POYJad 2iii;ie[1g gSiuea;gle:,d,
Affidavit of Publication ;no;esa a�q� `"0u pues�laaMq A%,,'plus)loeuittwH
JoJ do s2tgq;uana Aeui;i`;oe3 uSTATE OF WASHINGTON ss meal slq uoIoa33e 3ogonuz
COUNTY OF KING pinoM 33oAeI pope aq; }lurq; ;,u11
uaa;saiyi lllgaa;ad uolduiego 'i
Puajap jo pettnutm AJJJ f a02eu I
• `Aelap xaa't-auo aq; a;idsa !
Ta i111.. ';.,...Va.1•b!1 being first duly sworn on ! •sPIaij alRPueiva 1
Agaem pue pull naa ;e peAeld ,
oath,deposes and says that She..is the ...Ch ..e.f...c.J.e.K•.k of IIIM sauae� lle `sauie;� s,Aepo; as
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) suinlPe�$ ;n�eaJe3 Pue pui'y ,�.
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and Ie uoouaa;Je slq;aniJ ao3 palnpa!"
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred aae sauie� ;sai3 aqy (ems;Iio1�l
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- °l PI `uo;�aap `u03i�unlse�) sa.I
and it ir s now and duringhed four4)times a week in all of said time was printed in an office maintainedl 4nOJ uioa3 Ruluioo — shies; 2u-r
at the aforesaid place f publication of said newspaper.That the Renton
-uioo aqI Jo3;azloeaq;uauieuano;
Record-Chronicle,has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the • auluua;ap Him meap aiui;uoou
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, •sleuo i •
aq; q; dlJ; eq; Jo3 sueld lad;
g a3.2.4.1 Kolnb autos aaleui o; aneq IITM
Washington.That the annexed is a C.x ti. -nahtoq`aauUIM lenauana a
-IJJ6P gonuu oo q� (A
4 �noq;I� Pa;aldl
aq III ► al leg; Jallaq aae saou„
' s;Jos Jo anaUda.1 a s;a2 luauieu.�
as it was published in regular issues(and aq; `AEPJIOq a si Aupuoj, aou'
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period pauluIJa;ap aq;snvx and;e;
aJdaj;saMq;Joj�l 'OW`PIa1J�ui'
•
ul Aepo;uioaJ�laaM a sutaag luai
' of One (1) consecutive issues,commencing on the Jno; leuol;eN uol;elooss�• Ileq;
...1st...day of September 19 7 and ending the
pap eifd6
1st dayof SepteMbiar ,1978 ,both dates I
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee • ill
�c�r /l
. I_ ;,
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ , which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent
insertion.
1
r is
l
IA 1
;:t
Subscribed and sworn to before me this I a.t day of
S e p t a rater , 19.73... •o; aouego a pue auiu song (Aug
aq; an0o; ;uuMa eel; Jopn
1 (2„.A- ' ,._._ spa -•'No-,--- -^- ;Ai a
Notary Pu is 'n and fort a State of Washi ton,3
aq Al,,M '-
residing at Kent,King C unty. ., 11 3®AJo;s
EI00;i 0J0
an2eal ai
—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June .,
9th, 1955. uoie paa
aouo pu
—Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, a a�u
adopted by the newspapers of the State. Page 2 - Record-. rorrr�a�u s I v
Public Notices �u a JI Pa
salauy
11 CITY OF RENTON, 1
WASHINGTON 'I ORDINANCE NO,3241' I�,_,,._
V.P.C.Form No.87 - - - -- - - ---
s
Renton City Council
8/14/78 Page 2
Public Hearing - Cont
Vacation- the guardianship of the public's right to use as a street and
Portion of an easement; that the recommendation is to reserve the full
So. 7th St.- 30 ft. for the use of locating utilities allowing Puget Power
Cont. surface use. Motion by Shane to vacate the street. Motion
failed. *MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH THAT STREET BE
VACATED FROM 60 FEET EASTERLY OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE OF
MILMANCO, THAT THE VACATION FEE BE ESTABLISHED AT z THE ASSESSED
VALUATION AND UTILITY EASEMENTS BE RETAINED AS RECOMMENDED. Moved
by Thorpe motion be tabled until a report is made from the City
Attorney as to the city rights to the property. Motion failed.
Roll Call : Aye-Clymer, Perry, Stredicke, Shinpoch, Shane; No-
Thorpe. 5 Aye, 1 No. *MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Trimm returned to Council Chambers .
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Renton Hill Councilman Clymer left Council Chambers due to conflict of interest.
Rezone 10 Jim Irwin, Attorney, Transamerica Development Co. 1000 Norton Bldg.
requested opportunity to make an oral argument re appeal of
Hearing Examiner's decision on the Renton Hill rezone. Robert
McBeth, 1906 Rolling Hills Ave. SE, Attorney for Renton Hill
Community Assn. asked to speak. Planning and Development
Committee Chairman Perry explained notices of committee meeting
were sent to all parties of record. Asst. City Attorney, Kellogg
suggested that the council hear from both parties limiting the
amount of debate by setting a time limit and the Planning and
Development Committee report be distributed. Reports were
circulated to those present.
Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO RECESS, 8:55 P.M. CARRIED.
Reconvened at 9:10 P.M. Roll Call : All council members present
as previously listed.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO SUSPEND RULES AND HEAR AT THIS .
TIME THE HEARING EXAMINER DECISION, APPEAL, AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT RE RENTON HILL REZONE. CARRIED.
Subject before the council Hearing Examiner' s decision of July 12,
1978 re application by City of Renton for rezone R-3 to R-1 for
+12.1 acres property in the area of the westside of Renton Hill ,
between power line right-of-way and South 7th and FAI 405. Appeal
filed by Transamerica Development Co. The Hearing Examiner' s decision,
findings and conclusions, and appeal were reviewed by the Planning
and Development Committee and a recommendation prepared.
Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented report
recommending the Council concur in the findings of the Hearing
Examiner as modified, and that the council approve reclassification
of the three subject properties from R-3 to R-1 and the matter be
referred to the Ways and Means Committee for the proper ordinances.
The Committee report recommended modification bf Hearing Examiner
conclusion #9 to read as follows:"The natural constraints of the
site indicate that a PUD would be a possible and economically
profitable approach to development of the site."*MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND PERRY TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION.
Jim Irwin, Attorney, Transamerica Development Co. , commented on
appeal filed on the Hearing Examiner's decision. Following discussion
Mr. Irwin claimed Transamerica feels that there is no credible
evidence to support the Hearing Examiner's findings and decision.
Robert McBeth, Attorney, Renton Hill Community Association, claimed
Hearing Examiner's decision is supported by substantial evidence to
. support the change of zoning on Renton Hill . Councilman Stredicke
inquired about comprehensive plan for that area widening of the street.
Mr. Erickson, Planning Director, noted the comprehensive plan shows
the area as single family residential with the exception of Mill Ave. So.
\ Councilman Perry inquired about school transportation in the area.
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
August 14, 1978 Council Chambers
Monday, 8: 00 P .M . Municipal Building
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor C.J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President, GEORGE Y. PERRY, PATRICIA M.
COUNCIL SEYMOUR-THORPE, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, CHARLES F.
SHANE, THOMAS W. TRIMM.
CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; DAN..KELLOGG, Asst. City Attorney; GWEN
IN ATTENDANCE MARSHALL, Finance Director; MARINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk;
WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Direcotr; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN,
Planning Director; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks Director; Jim Bourasa,
Police Dept. Rep.
PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle; ERIC PRYNE, Seattle Times.
MINUTE APPROVAL Councilman Stredicke requested amendment to Page 3 for the
information requested from the Mayor to the Ways and Means
Committee re the appointment of airport director; if the position
had been announced openly or advertised, salary involved in the
recommendation and whether full or part-time job. Also requested
verification of Heather Downs LID 297 location, cost and
design that were previously approved by the council at the public
hearing. (See later discussion) MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY
TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 7, 1978 AS AMENDED. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING
Councilman Trimm left the Council Chambers due to conflict of interest.
Vacation - Portion Mr. Tom Cook, owner of Milmanco, reported that he had met with
of So. 7th St. Puget. Power to try and resolve problems associated with possible
(Cont. from street vacation. In talking with Bill Arthur of Puget Power it
8/7/78) was suggested that the vacation of So. 7th St. start at 60 feet
east of the west Milmanco property line. Councilwoman Thorpe
inquired as to position of buildings to property line, requirements
for set back. Mr. Gonnason, Public Works Director, explained
location of building to the property line. Mr. Ericksen, Planning
Director, noted that there are no set back requirements. Councilman
Stredicke inquired as to ownership of property between present
Burnett St. and the owners property line. Gonnason explained
property is owned by the City and is proposed for a park development.
Councilman Stredicke then suggested tailoring down of the proposed
street vacation. Gonnason noted council can vacate all of So. 7th
with the exception of the area lying within 60 ft. of the West
property line. Councilman Shane inquired as to property owned by
Puget Power and the utilities now in that area. Mr. Gonnason
explained all utilities are within So. 30 ft. The existing ashpalt
road appears to be about 30 ft. in width and has been opened and
used by the public for a period in excess of seven years, which
is required to give the public the right to use it. Shane questioned
parking. Mr. Gonnason explained that the amount required by ordinance
was present. Councilman Clymer inquired about area to be developed by
the city. Mr. Gonnason explained it was a possible alternative to
provide access to Milmanco property. Councilwoman Thorpe inquired
about zoning. Ericksen noted L-1 zoning on both sides of So. 7th.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE TO CLOSE THE HEARING. Roll Call .
Aye-Perry, Stredicke, Shinpoch, •Shane; No-Clymer, Thorpe. 4 Aye's,
2 No's. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Thorpe inquired if the city
could vacate street, but retain as property. Asst. City Attorney,
Dan Kellogg, said he would research. Councilman Clymer inquired re
acquisition of property for SR 515. Mr. Gonnason noted the city has
'
Renton City Council
8/14/78 Page 4
Certification of Transportation Committee Chairwoman Shinpoch presented report
State Highway recommending that Certification of State Highway Routes within
Routes corporate limits of Renton be referred to the City Clerk and
the Public Works Director for administrative purposes.
Transportation Councilwoman Shinpoch noted recent committee meetings, in particular
Committee Meeting extension of SR 515 which concluded that the Transportation Committee
(Ext. SR 515) needs to coordinate with Community Services Committee and Park Board
for any plans the city may have for the South Renton Property and
noted people in that area are applying for low interest federal loans
to rehabilitate homes. Councilwoman Thorpe inquired if SR 515 exten-
sion was on the State 6 Year Street Plan at this time. Mr. Gonnason
noted not at this time.
Award of Contract Utilities Committee Chairman Shane presented report recommending
LID #297 award of contract, LID #297, Heather Downs Sanitary Sewer Project .
Heather Downs to C. Ed Bowen Construction Co. in the total amount of $503,577.76.
Sanitary Sewer Mayor and City Clerk authorized to sign contract documents. Councilman
Stredicke requested response to. previous questions whether costs,
location, and design are as originally approved at public hearing.
He also inquired if the J & K Development and. the possible extension
of Leisure Estates would be utilizing the project. Mr. Gonnason
noted that location, design, and construction were as approved '
by council and a report was being prepared to include allocation
of cost, which would be reduced as developers will be paying part ,
of the cost. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Appointment *Moved by Shane, Second Trimm to confirm part-time airport director
Part-time appointment. Councilman Perry noted• appointment was in Committee
Airport Director awaiting information re rate of pay and how many hours the director
would be working. Mayor added it would be part-time. Motion by
Thorpe to table motion pending report of committee. Motion
failed. Councilwoman Shinpoch noted that there was no objection
to nominee, but awaiting additional information only. Councilman
Stredicke added that council has not been able to meet with the
individual . Roll Call : Aye-Shane, Trimm; No-Clymer, Perry, Thorpe,
Stredicke, Shinpoch. 2 Ayes, 5 No. *Motion failed.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ordinance #3239 Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading of
Amending Time Ordinance amending time and place of council meetings. MOVED BY
and Place STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS.
(Removel of CARRIED. Second and final reading of an ordinace of the City
11:00 Curfew) amending Section 1-503 of Title 1 (administrative) of Ordinance
no. 1628 entitled "Code of General ,Ordinancesof the City of
Renton" relating to time and place of city council meetings. MOVED
BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Roll Call :
Aye-Thorpe, Stredicke, Shinpoch, Shane, Trimm; No-Clymer, Perry.
MOTION CARRIED.
Resolution #2205 Resolution was. read amending city of Renton Resolutions #1616,
Adopting Forward 1624, and 1754 to change Item 23 to read "SR-515 Phase II (Puget
Thrust Project Dr. S. to S. city limits) . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH
Listing Change TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTTON AS READ. CARRIED.
Voucher Approval The Ways and Means Committee report recommended council approval
of vouchers nos. 19172 thru no. 19420 (machine voids 19167-19171)
in the total amount of $510,108.42 as previously approved by
department certification as to receipt of goods or services.
Also includes payment of LID #297 Warrants: Revenue #R-6 $1,235.56,
Cash #C-7 $35,56, Cash #C-8 $1,200.00; LID 302 Warrants: Revenue #R-21
$1,903.21, Cash C-44 $1,534.10, Cash .C-45 $369.11; LID 307 Warrants:
Revenue #R-1 $85,359.31, Cash C-1 $75.90, Cash C-2 $85,283.41.' MOVED
BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY TO CONCUR IN VOUCHER APPROVAL RECOMMENDATIONS.
CARRIED.
Renton City Council
8/14/78 Page 3
Audience Comment - Cont.
Renton Hill Mr. McBeth noted the younger children go up the hill and older
Rezone-Cont. children down the hill to catch the school bus. Councilman Shane
noted the area is residential , that the streets are not-capable of
high density traffic and the city has the right to make certain
requirements. Councilwoman Thorpe asked Mr. Irwin to explain his
use of the words "credible evidence". Mr. Irwin noted the meaning
as substantial evidence. Councilwoman Thorpe noted for the record
the action that the committee has recommended does not make a
PUD mandatory, but even though we don't put that kind of stipulation
on the property, it is important to know that the committee is not
disagreeing with statements made by the examiner. Asst. City
Attorney Kellogg confirmed for the record that at the committee
meeting there was no. discussion by either party outside the presence
of the other. Roll Call : All Ayes. *MOTION CARRIED.
Recess MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE TO RECESS 9:55 P.M. CARRIED.
Reconvened at 10:05 P.M. Roll Call : All Council members present
as previously listed.
OLD BUSINESS
May Creek Community Services Chairwoman Thorpe presented report that the •
Drainage May Creek Drainage Plan is proceeding with funding from other
Plan sources. Councilman Shane inquired as to why this subject had
• not been referred to the utilities committee. Upon discussion
by council it was explained that this is a community project and
council had made the previous referral to the Community Services
Committee. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND CLYMER TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
208 Areawide Community Services Committee report recommended council approval
Water Quality of 208 Areawide- Water Quality Plan formal statement. MOVED BY
Plan THORPE, SECOND SHANE TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Earlington MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY TO REMOVE EARLINGTON' PARK BID OPENING.
Park FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. August 4, 1978 bid opening,
two bids received; Earlington Park Construction. Park Board
recommended award of contract to Graham Landscape Co. Low bid
hi'd in the amount of $26,139.20. Community Services Committee
report recommended the council authorize awarding of the bid and
transfer of funds as requested. Moved by Clymer, Second Thorpe
to concur in committee recommendation. Substitute Motion: MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE TO AMEND THE MOTION AND REFER TO THE
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. . Councilman Shane inquired as to financing.
Mayor Delaurenti explained the money received from County for this
project. Councilwoman Thorpe noted the moeny has been drawn from
other projects that would not be completed this year. Mr. John
Webley, Parks Director, explained projects that money would come
from. Councilwoman Shinpoch inquired if the area people had been
notififed of developments and changes made. Mr. Webley noted they
were aware. MOTION CARRIED.
Main Fire Station, Councilman Stredicke inquired as to reports requested last week,
from Administration re main fire station, and appointment of
Airport Director part-time airport director. Mayor noted the fire station report
Appointment was completed and distributed and report would be forthcoming
on the appointment. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE THAT FIRE
STATION REPORT AND MATTER RE REFERRED TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
FOR REVIEW AND REPORT UNTIL COMPLETION OF PROJECT. CARRIED.
. 1`J1
•
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
AUGUST 14, 1978
File No. R-178-78 - Transamerica Development Company Appeal of Hearing Examiner's
Decision dated July 12, 1978
The Planning and Development Committee has considered the record and the Hearing
Examiner's written decision, findings and conclusions in the above matter. The
Committee finds that, except as noted below, each material finding and conclusion
set forth in the Examiner's decision is supported by substantial evidence in the
record. Except as noted below, the Committee recommends that the City Council
adopt all of the Examiner's findings, conclusions and recommendations.
The Committee finds that there was admitted into evidence an application for a
tentative Planned Unit Development dated April 28, 1978, for single family and
town house development, on a portion Of the subject premises, and labeled as
"Cedar Crest PUD. " (Exhibit No'. 34) The Committee finds that this application
was properly admitted into evidence for the- sole purpose of rebuttal of the property
owners following contentions:
A. That the rezone of the property to R-1 precludes use of the
property for any purpose to which it is reasonably adapted.
B. There is no possibility for profitable use of the property
under the restrictions of the rezone.
C. That the greater part of the value of the property is '
destroyed by the rezone.
The Examiner's conclusion that ". . . . a PUD would be a necessary approach to
development on the site" was beyond the jurisdiction of the Examiner and not
supported by substantial evidence.
The first sentence of Conclusion No. 9 should be modified to read as follows :
•
"The natural constraints of the site indicate that a PUD would
be a possible and economically profitable approach to development
of the site. "
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Development Committee recommends that the City Council concur
in the Findings of the Hearing Examiner and the Conclusions as modified above,
and that the City Council approve reclassification of the three subject properties
from R-3 to R-1 and that the matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee
for the proper ordinances.
Vice -/4Y1G1,%[ vic. r }
e, ge Perry, Patricia Seymour-Thorpe
•
Rarhara Shi.nooch
,2
•
August 14, 1978
The subject before the Renton City Council at this time is the
Hearing Examiner' s decision of July 12, 1978 (File No. R-178-78) regard-
ing the application filed by the City of Renton for rezone of property
from R-3 District, Medium Density Multi-family to R-1 Single Family
District. The Hearing Examiner recommended approval with conditions
for. the 12. 1 acres located on the West side of Renton Hill , south of
South 7th Street, east of FAI-405 and north of the Puget Power transmission -
line easement and east of the subdivided property of Renton Hill .
•
Appeal has. been filed by Transamerica Development Company by their
attorneys Shidler, McBroom, Gates' and Baldwin. .
The Hearing Examiner's decision-and the appeal. were- reyi.ewed by the
Council ' s Planning and Development Committee on August 9, 1978 and
a recommendation prepared.
q\
C ‘rvi Cleo
A,\-) RA
,A
RA,
p w ) .i 0
z THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL
istp MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055. 235-2586
v nawn
094
TE0 SEP11M4'1/4
MEMORANDUM
TO: All Interested Parties DATE: July 28, 1978
FROM: George Perry, Chairman
Council Planning and Development Committee
SUBJECT: Renton .Hill Appeal
The Planning and Development Committee of the Renton City Council will
meet on Wednesday, August 9, in the Council Chambers at 7:30 p.m.. for
the purpose of reviewing the appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision
on the Renton Hill rezone matter.
You are invited to attend this meeting; however, it is not a public
hearing. The meeting is specifically to allow the Planning and
Development Committee the opportunity to review the Hearing Examiner's
decision and the appeal. The Committee will then prepare its recommendation
to be presented to the City Council at its regularly scheduled meeting of
August 14.
GP:hh
•
•
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King )
Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 21st day of July , 1978 ' , affiant
deposited in the :nails of the United States a sealed envelope
Notice of Appeal
containing xxcscianxxRRIRVi t4 with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
11/4.(A- t? '
•
Subscribed and sworn this 01 day of �vl
19 -6 . •
Notary Public in and for theIState
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case: R-178-78; City of ,Renton .. - . -
(The miruiteb contain a fizt o6 the pian,tiea o6 n.edond)
OF R4
�,
v �i 7_ THE. CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
' 21 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® DELORES A. MEAD
CITY CLERK
O 'EDSEPj -‘:e July 20 , 1978 '
APPEAL FILED BY : James R. Irwin
David. H . Binney
Shidler , McBroom, Gates & Baldwin
1000 Norton Building
Seattle , Washington 98104 -
223-4666
Attorneys for Transamerica
Development Company
Re : Appeal of 'Land Use- Examiner' s Decision dated
7-12-78 , Transamerica Development Company ,
R-178-78 , from R-3 to R-1
To. Parties of Record
Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner ' s decision has been filed
with the City Clerk ' s Office 'on July 20 , 1978 , along with the
proper fee of $25 . 00 , pursuant to Title 4 , Ch . 30 , City Code ,
as amended . The City Code requires the appeal must be set
forth in -writing .
The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be
reviewed by the Council ' s Plaonhrnig & Development Committee .
Please contact - th'e . Council Secretary , 235-2586 , for date and
time of the committee meeting if so desired .
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will
be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting
of Au.gustv14 , . 1978 at 8 : 00 p .m . in the Council Chambers , 2nd
Floor , Municipal Building , 200 Mill Ave . S . , Renton .
D Yoursa;very truly ,
CITY OF RENTON •' -
patgetill 7/4ta-at
Delores A. Mead , C . M. C .
City Clerk' -
DAM : fd
cc : Parties of Record
CITY OF RENTON No. 5768
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055
19 -
RECEIVED OF 77A t
1
(Alf
TOTAL
GWEN E. MARSHALL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
Y
5-9 ja 1978
co RECEV E®
1James R. Irwin
David H. Binney �� O� RK,g offtCE�c.'
2 1BGates & Baldwin ,ti62
1000 Norton Building �3 Seattle, Washington 98104
223-4666
4 Attorneys for Transamerica
Development Company
5
6
7
8 IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE L. RICK. BEELER, HEARING EXAMINER
9 In Re )
10 CITY OF RENTON REZONE ) File No. R-178-78
APPLICATION )
11 ) NOTICE OF APPEAL OF
EXAMINER' S DECISION TO
12 ) CITY COUNCIL
13 )
14 Transamerica Development Company, pursuant to Section 4-3016
15 of the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance, appeals
16 to and seeks review by the City Council of the decision of the
17 Hearing Examiner, and the Findings, Conclusion and Recommendations
18 made in support of the decision, entered herein on July 12, 1978 .
19 The specific errors relied on are:
20 1. The city, as the proponent of the rezone, did not
21 sustain its burden of proof to show that conditions have sub-
22 stantially changed since the original zoning of the subject
23 property, and that the rezone was required in the public interest
24 as a result of such change.
25 2. The city did not sustain its burden of proof to show
26 that the proposed rezone bore a substantial relationship to the
27 public health, safety, morals or welfare.
28 3. The decision of the Hearing Examiner to downzone the
29 subject property constitutes an unconstitutional taking of
30 Transamerica ' s property without just compensation. The expert
31 testimony given by Frank Raney, an MAI Appraiser, that the down-
32 zoning would result in a $236,250.00 reduction of the fair market
LAW OFFICES OF
NOTICE OF APPEAL - 1 SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
I value of Transamerica's property was unrebutted. The greater
2 portion of the value of Transamerica's property is destroyed by
3 the rezone.
4 4. The decision to rezone the property constitutes arbitrary
5 and inverse spot zoning.
6 5. The decision is arbitrary and capricious and contrary to
7 law.
8 6. The decision is unsupported by credible evidence.
9 7. The examiner erred in considering the tentative P.U.D.
10 (Ex. #34) and application for P.U.D. (Ex. #45) in the face of
11 testimony that the property subject to the P.U.D. had not been
12 sold to the party who submitted it, and he had no ownership
13 interest in the property.
14 8. The examiner's conclusions that everyone was in agreement
15 that (1 ) "inconvenience would occur to motorists using the streets
16 on Renton Hill due to traffic produced by R-3 development" and
17 that ( 2) "a P.U.D. was appropriate for the site" , were not based
18 on credible evidence and therefore arbitrary and capricious
19 (Conclusion #3 ) .
20 9. The examiner's conclusion that R-1 zoning would permit a
21 reasonable return on the original investment and reasonable use
22 of the property was unsupported by any credible evidence and was
23 clearly erroneous (Conclusion #5) . There was no evidence (1 )
24 that the cost of development would be only $12, 000/acre, or (2)
25 that single family lots in the subject property (which is closer
26 to the freeway and steeper in slope than the rest of the neighbor-
27 hood) would sell for $20,000 .00, and there was no evidence given
28 that justified this conclusion.
29 10. The examiner's finding that the benefits to the public
30 health, safety and welfare outweighed the burden on the property
31 owner was not supported by substantial or credible evidence
32 (Conclusion #10 ) . Evidence submitted by the City of Renton was to
LAW OFFICES OF
NOTICE OF APPEAL - 2 SHIDLER,Mc BROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
1 the effect that increased traffic from R-3 development at more
2 than 7 units per acre could be absorbed with some inconvenience
3 to motorists. A finding that such inconvenience outweighs the
4 burden on the property owner imposed by the downzone is clearly
5 erroneous.
6 11. The examiner' s finding that the application for rezone
7 was not arbitrarily and capriciously filed, for reasons of disbenefil
8 to the subject properties, is not supported by credible evidence
9 and is clearly erroneous. The evidence was that property on Mill
10 Avenue South, which was not distinguished from the subject
11 property, retained its R-3 zoning. Furthermore, no evidence was
12 submitted regarding the nature of the other properties about
13 which a rezone would be initiated.
14 12. The examiner erred in considering or giving weight to
15 the Renton City Council ' s December 5, 1977 amendment to the
16 Comprehensive Plan, said amendment and resulting plan being
17 invalid due to (1) inadequate notice of public hearings, ( 2)
18 failure to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act of
19 1971, ( 3 ) interfering with Transamerica's contractual rights
20 and/or expectancies, (4 ) encouraging the taking of Transamerica' s
21 land without fair compensation, ( 5) acting in an arbitrary,
22 capricious and discriminatory way toward Transamerica's property,
23 and ( 6) acting in violation of the appearance of fairness doctrine.
24 The time and date when the council will consider the appeal
25 is: `61' .) ar A u_ls, 4 I c_ch_
26 ` ' e C ,m c2-e-51 .v- �,
27 DATED this day of July, 1978.
28 SHIDLER, McBROOM, GATES & BALDWIN
29
By 41,
30 1 mes R. Irwin, Attorney
'for Transamerica Development
31 Company
32
LAW OFFICES OF
NOTICE OF APPEAL - 3 SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
•
•
'
1 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
2 This is to certify that copies of the Notice of Appeal were
3 mailed to Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney, and to Robert E.
4 McBeth, attorney for the Renton Hill Community Association, and
5 to the following parties on the mailing list:
6 Kathy Keolker, 532 Cedar Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
Ruth Bradley, 709 High Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
7 Peggy Jernigan, 412 Mill Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
8 Amelia Telban, 508 Cedar Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
Jim Breda, 1002 Grant Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
9 Robert McBeth, 1906 Rolling Hills Ave. S.E. , Renton, WA 98055
Dennis Stremick, 2532 Smithers Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
10 Jim Irwin, 1000 Norton Building, Seattle, WA 98104
Ahmed Jaddi, Consulting Engineers, Milligan, Anderson,
11 Jaddi, Building C-10, Fisherman's Terminal, Seattle,
WA 98119
12 Frank Raney, 16625 Redmond Way, Suite 206, Redmond, WA 98052
Bill Montagne, Transamerica Development Corp. , 600
13 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, CA 94111
John Albertson, 155 N. 35th, Seattle, WA 98103
14 Mrs . Ray Hansen, 336 Mill Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
Mary Lou Gustine, 910 High Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
15 John Giuliani, 1400 S. 7th, Renton, WA 98055
Dennis L. Linch, 320 Mill Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055
16 • Jerry Glenn Dunnihoo, 434 Mill Ave. S. , Renton, WA 98055
Mr. & Mrs. F. G. (Mike) McCutcheon, 918 Renton Ave. S. ,
17 Renton, WA 98055
Eric Pryne, Seattle Times South Bureau, 320 Andover Park E. ,
18 Tukwila, WA 98188
19 Nancy Sparrow, 316 Renton Ave. So. , Renton, WA 98055
Joe McCaslin, 17637 S.E. 123rd Place, Renton, WA 98055
20 Renton Record-Chronicle, P.O. Box 1076, Renton, WA 98055
Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Ave. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055
21 and to:
22 Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
23 Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
24 Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
25 Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
26
27 UBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this o!C day of
-�1
28 , 1978.
29
30 Notary bl ' in and for the 1 ,
Sta a of to , residing
31 at
32 D18/2
JRI :cz
7/20/78 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
NOTICE OF APPEAL - 4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
Renton City Council
7/10/78 Page 2
Correspondence and Current Business Cont.
Proclamation by Mayor's proclamation was read declaring July 12 through 23, 1978
Mayor as Renton Arts and Crafts Days. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE
TO CONCUR WITH PROCLAMATION. CARRIED.
Mayor's `Trip-to--- Noted by Mayor and Councilman Perry,for the record,that the Mayor's
Sister City in trip to Japan and all gifts presented were not paid for with city
Japan funds. The Mayor enjoyed his 'trip; all 'gifts ,were well received,
and especially impressive were pedestrian overpasses, to be suggested
to our highway department; pictures displayed. Councilwoman. Thorpe
suggested that sister city gifts be displayed in a conspicuous place
during the creative arts festival , so that the public may more readily
view them.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
SR515 - So. Dennis Stremick, President,Victoria Park Homeowners' Association,.
27th Street recalled SR 515 hearing wherein a poll'to be taken of residents for
closure of So 27th St. and reported 94%. favored closure of that
access. Transportation Committee Chairwoman Shinpoch, acknowledged.
receipt of copy of letter - the subject under discussion with State
Highway Department.
World Government Dick Kaynor, Harry Pavelka, 972' Industry'Drive, Tukwila, WA,on
for the Age of behalf of the World Government for the °Age;.of ,Enlightenment, noted
-Enlightenment engagement in a campaign nationw.ide to tey'to ,create a model of an
ideal society. In discussion by council members it was determined
that they would be allowed five minutes: presentation, but due to
nature of the subject matter they were requested to otherwise contact. ,
council members individually.
OLD BUSINESS
Comprehensive MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHINPOCH, THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Plan Review RELATING TO THE AREA NORTH OF THE CEDAR RIVER, TO BOEING PLANT
AND RAINIER AVE. TO THE FREEWAY BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION IN VIEW OF THE EXTENSIVE` CHANGES RESULTING FROM THE
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMS AND CORE AREA RENOVATIONS CARRIED: ;' ','
Councilman Shane suggested that no changes be made as property
owners can not determine the value of their property, make plans, '.' '.
etc. if the council keeps changing the comprehensive plan. .
Q ) _Benton Hill Councilman Perry submitted letter for reading" from`City Attorney
�� Rezon - Warren to Hearing, Examiner Beeler, that' 'i n in his opinion, if in
Extension of fact it is impossible forthe Hearing Examiner to render an opinion
Time on the Renton Hill Rezone within the required time and if there is
no unreasonable or prejudicial 'delay then the additional 'time is
permissable being consistant with state law. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND' -.:.,
THORPE, TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION"BY CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED.
Following discussion it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE THAT THE
HEARING EXAMINER. ORDINANCE BE..REFERRED_TO.:THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTEE FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEW AS CONCERNS TIME EXTENSION FOR
EXAMINER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDATION TO APPELLANT AND COUNCIL,UNDER
EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES; AND FOR SETTINGrTIME 'LIMITS FOR COMPLIANCE
TO ITEMS REQUIRING PERFORMANCE BONDS. 'CARRIED.
Automatic Response Public Safety Committee recommended that 'the '.Mayor and City Clerk
with Kent and be authorized to sign the Automatic Response Agreements with Kent
Tukwila Fire and Tukwila Fire Districts 20 &,,25. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHINPOCH
District 20 & 25 TO CONCUR WITH COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. '
Voucher The Ways and Means Committee Chairman reported Committee' recommenda-
Approval tion for council approval of vouchers,'nros. .18830 thru no. '18975
(machine voids no. 18825 no.= 18829) in the total amount of
$282,518.04 as previously approved by'°department certification
as to receipt of goods or services. Also includes LID 302 Warrants:
Revenue #R-19 $318.75,. Cash G-37 $300.0O,,,Cash C-38 $18.75. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER TO CONCUR IN VOUCHER APPROVAL RECOMMENDATIONS.
CARRIED.
er Z°
U ®D
z .a — Z OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ® RENTON,WASHINGTON
4au �:�' crSb+ O
°Ivry POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678
�A `a (0-
p LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
4r'OSEPtE�® JULY 5 , 1978
MEMORANDUM
TO : Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
FROM: Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney
Re:. Renton Hill Rezone
Dear Rick:
I have been asked to correspond with you concerning your
stated inability to render an opinion on the Renton Hill Rezone
within the time given to you by City Ordinance. It is my
opinion that if it is in fact impossible for you to render
that opinion within the required time, and, if there is no
showing that the delay was unreasonable or prejudicial to any
party, then you may have the additional time.
I might note that this opinion is consistent with State case
law. The Supreme Court of this State recently set down such
a- ruling in the case of In. Re Donohoe, 90 Wn (2d) , 173 (June
1978) . In that case the State said :
"The delay was not unreasonable in view of
•
the necessity of obtaining and reviewing
3 days of testimony, plus the exhibits . That
fact, coupled with no claim or showing of
prejudice, justifies denial of a dismissal . "
In that particular case a hearing board of the State Bar
Association was to be able to render an opinion within 20
days as required by Court rules . I find that situation
analogous to yours and find that the delay is appropriate.
Lawrence J. WArren
LJW.,.;nd
cc : Mayor
Council Members
Del Mead
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
June 26 , 1978 Council Chambers
Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Municipal Building
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Council President Earl Clymer, Mayor Pro tem, led the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag and called the meeting of the Renton City
Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President, GEORGE J . PERRY, RICHARD M.
COUNCIL STREDICKE, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, CHARLES F. SHANE, and THOMAS W.
TRIMM. MOVED BY SHANE, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO EXCUSE ABSENT .
COUNCILWOMAN SEYMOUR-THORPE. CARRIED.
CITY OFFICIALS D.W. CUSTER, Mayor' s Administrative Assistant; GWEN MARSHALL,
IN ATTENDANCE Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; JOHN BUFF, Police Dept.
Rep.
PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle.
MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF
JUNE 19, 1978 AS PREPARED AND MAILED. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Drainacje on lErnest J. Lobe, 2709 Talbot Road S. , questioned content of
Talbot Road South ' newspaper article. Inquired as to city action to alleviate
Talbot Road drainage problem, discussed last week. Dick
Houghton, utility supervisor, reported inspection of the
( drainage pipe and advised of twc possible modes of correction.
= 1 ) Bypass ditch parallel with existing pipe or 2) require
-developer to install curh, gutter, and storm drains, which
':had been waived on short plat by' a covenant to put in L. I .D.
when ,_,r_eques-ted-by the city, problem would have been alleviated
Thad the improvements been installed by the developer. MOVED BY
'STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE THE ADMINISTRATION MOVE IN LEGAL ACTION
'TO HAVE INSTALLATION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AS ORIGINALLY SET FORTH
IN HEARING EXAMINER FINDINGS . CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS
Rent®r ' 11 Councilman Perry recalled the Renton Hill rezone matter presently
Rezone Decision before the hearing examiner and inquired regarding hearing examiner' s
by Hi-aring request for additional time to complete his findings and render a
Exami final decision. After some discussion concerning proper and legal
action to be taken by the council , it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND
SHINPOCH, THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY REVIEW THE ORDINANCE AND IF HE IS
OF THE OPINION NO TIME EXTENSION MAY BE GRANTED BY COUNCIL , HE
ADVISES THE HEARING EXAMINER HE HAS 14 DAYS AFTER HE CLOSES THE
HEARING TO MAKE HIS DECISION. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman
Stredicke inquired for the record if all parties involved had
agreed to waive the 14 days requirement - Puget Western apparently
not represented. (See later discussion of that matter under
correspondence. )
Meeting of the Councilman Perry advised the Health Care Resolution had been
Association of presented at Association of Washington Cities meeting in Yakima.
Washington Cities- As no one was there to represent the City of Renton, Representative
Health Care Avery Garrett spoke for the city. Communication from Rep. Garrett
Resolution states he is ready to present Resolution at the next session of the
Legislature, Senator Shinpoch is ready to go before the house in
regards to the health care funding. Councilwoman Shinpoch suggested
a letter be written to thank Rep. Garrett for speaking on our
behalf and thanked Councilman Perry for his assistance, as it
could save a great deal of money. The Chair requested a letter
to be written by Don Custer. AWC policy statement was distributed.
Renton City Council
6/26/78 Page 2
Old Business - Cont.
Award of Contract Community Services report recommended award of EDA/LPW Project
Cedar River Trail contract Cedar River Trail System - Phase III to Sun-Up Construc-
System-Phase III tion Co. in the sum of $1 ,001 ,045 the bid of $1 ,125,854 minus
negotiated reductions as recommended by consultants, Jongejan/
Gerrard/Associates and the Planning Department, the Mayor and City
Clerk authorized to sign the contract documents . MOVED BY
STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION.
CARRIED.
Repair of Grady Councilman Stredicke inquired in regards to Grady Way Bridge
Way. Bridge repair. Administrative Assistant Custer advising of closure for
work tomorrow by the railroad co. on the bridge bents and sills,
further damage suffered due to increased use from closure of
Monster Road on through to Sunset Blvd. West. $10,000 cost
estimate was noted to include road construction over the bridge,
the bridge posing problem for the city in that it is in need of
additional repairs.
Penton Airport Councilwoman Shinpoch, chairman of the Aviation Committee, submitted
report recommending that the City join with the Chamber of Commerce.
in seeking to have the Renton Airport included in the Port of
Puget Sound for Customs Service. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE,
TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
SR 515 Proposed motion by Shane, Second Stredicke, to extend SR 51.5
Extension, from Grady Way to the North Renton Interchange. (FAI. 405) was
Grady Way to . discussed with amendment by' Shinpoch to refer subject to Trans
North Renton portation Committee. City Attorney Warren advised such action
Interchange may not be taken without informing the public. Further remarks
were made as to the extension haying been included in the 6 year
arterial plan at one time, and subsequently dropped, and the need
SR 515 Approval for submittal of a resolution to the .sta.te.. in the meantime for SR 515.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE TO-REFER THE MATTER TO LEGAL
OFFICE FOR REVIEW AND PROPER RESOLUTION. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND BY SHANE, TO SET JULY ?4, 1978 AS PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR
PROPOSED EXTENSION OF SR 515, COMMENCING AT GRADY WAY AND ENDING
FAI 405, NORTH RENTON INTERCHANGE AREA. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY,
6 Year Street SECOND SHANE, THAT THE ADMINISTRATION REQUEST THE STATE HIGHWAY
and Arterial 1FPARTMENT TO GRANT 45 DAY TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBMITTAL OF THE
Program • CITY 'S 6 YEAR STREET CONSTRUCTION AND ARTERIAL PROGRAM. CARRIED.
*MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND SHINPOCH THAT TALBOT ROAD PROJECT BE REFERRED
TO TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE . Shane in discussion objected to
closure of Talbot Road noting expansive development of -condominiums,
etc. in the area urjing that it be designated an arterial like
Edmonds and that it be included in ;he state highway department—
:
plans , also suggesting high priority item in the 6 year street plan .
*CARRIED. .
Council Meeting MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, TO CANCEL MONDAY , JULY 3rd, 1973
of July 3, 1978 COUNCIL MEETING. CARRIED.
cancelled
King County EMS Councilman Trimm, Chairman of the Public Safety Committee, submitted
Contract for CPR report recommending approval of King County EMS contract to provide
Training to School CPR training for Renton Middle and High School students , and that .the
Students Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract documents .
MOVED BY TRIMM; SECOND SHANE, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
e/Pre
CITY OF RENTON ' 123-', :
LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER a
CO 7411
PUBLIC HEARING
JUNE 13, 1978 csN .����
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING
R-178-78 CITY OF RENTON
Application for rezone from R-3 District ,
Medium Density Multi -family, to R-1 ,
Single Family District, property located
on the west side of Renton Hill and situ-
ated south of South 7th Street, east of
FAI-405 , north of, the Puget Sound and
Light Transmission Line Easement, and
east of the subdivided property .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
JUNE 13, 1978
APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON
FILE NUMBER:. 'R-178-78, 'REZONE
A. SUMMARY:
Applicant initiated a rezone from R-3 District, Medium Density Multi-Family to
R-1 , Single Family District.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
•
1 . Owner of Record: Transamerica Development Company
Puget Western, Inc.
Mary Tyrrel
2. Applicant: City of Renton
3. Location: Property is on the west side of Renton Hill
south of South 7th Street; east of FAI-405;
north of the Puget Sound Power and Light
Company transmission line easement and east
of the subdivided property. See Exhibits
B-1 , B-2 (not included in this report) , B-3
(not included in this report) , and B-4 (not
included in this report).
4. Legal Description: Detailed legal descriptions are available on
file in the Renton Planning Department.
5. Size of Properties: . The parcels total ± 12.1 acres.
6. ccess: Primarily via Cedar Avenue South with less,
access available on Renton Avenue South, Grant
Avenue South, High Avenue South, and Jones
Avenue South.
7. Existing Zoning: R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential
District.
8. Existing Zoning in Area: R-1 , Single Family Residential District and
R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential
District
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single Family.
10. Notification: The property owners were notified in writing
of the hearing date. Notice was properly
published in the Record Chronicle and posted
in three places on or near the site as required
by City Ordinance.
C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The rezone was initiated to review the existing zoning in relation with the
Comprehensive Plan.
E'XH/B/r 8—I
1 - - r I ` N CEME rEi
s. F t� \ ' \`✓ PARK i / \ V. f
� •J':,.:.:;:,1:.-.1:11;•..;..1.1.1:1.;,
. 14111 "11..6
1.
. l : '� =� � YY d.
r� q Er Y /
run—. INN m7 , lie, = .n, ! is �l1
rowan ._, :R' n.mai "�'
mr
4444141r N \
-711`11 'OP .:01,!rd -4'- `a / '
4
14., ,,,..„ . ., ., . . , .
[7- R
: - \, -,_..p.„
, ._ 4.14. B-I
ls+.�'t.is�.' to I;— — —.1 rk" s 7 �T ►
ir - 4 iit 'dm ME ' • ,
,, H-1 4 4.. .
s. ‘,,,,,,, ...,
•,,,,_y
. .. . _ IP • II aZ \
Hi
CME!' $$ `ik.a. * -
f
\ is - ' �
Gn C ,
_ N 1st- se , kt.
..._ 7 'Pi 1 _ I
- , .,..... .. .4' I il r i: a 2 0 tt 11.1 • MI 0 ",,,\,,,
07' / 1))11 ,
...6 O •: In y tl 4 .� SRI
S
q tt ., f1 ( . M.
r G \ �,
�N5
II .. tt.I..
, , w e u ti 1 w .; .; 6 -a-�.
: �1' �i,'' ' / 4 ��'� !n .. I a a P�P. nJ� P
1 /% �Ili1irii i//ir
et OM
GS-' I
I
t4V)(116f3-i
1' J tiropPlw" ,
.
REZONE :
CITY OF RENTON , File No. R- 178-78,, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-3 TO
R- 1 ; property located oh the west side of Renton Hill and situated
south of South 7th Street, east of FAI-405 , north of the Puget -Sound
and Light Transmission Line Easement, and east of the subdivided
property.
APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON TOTAL AREA 12 . 1t acres
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Cedar, Renton , and Grant Avenues South
EX? S-► ING ZONING R-3
EXISTING USE Vacant , .
PROPOSED USE Residential
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential
COMMENTS This is the first phase of an area-wide' rezone initiated
by the City of Renton . Three ownerships are involved in
this phase. I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE TWO
D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed by Ordinance Number 1547 in May, 1956.
E: PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Geology - See Exhibit E-1
Ground Moraine
Characterisitc Artificial Fill Renton Formation Deposits
Special Feature - - - Partly cemented, Intimately graded
but contains mixture of clay to
uncemented beds. gravel sizes.
Drainage Highly variable. Runoff excellent. Runoff variable.
Foundation
Stability Highly variable. Excellent, but Excellent.
subject to
limitations of,
slope.
Slope
Stability Higly variable. Stands for long Stands in steep
periods in steep natural and cutslopes
natural and for long periods.
articifial cuts.
Dip of beds may
affect slope
stability.
Seismic
Stability Very poor. Good. Good.
Information Source: Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County,
Washington by .D.R. Mullineaux (Map GQ-405).
Renton Hillis underlain with coal deposits, much of which have been mined out. The
remaining deposits are considered marginal quality and are usually in thin, twisted
beds at great depths. It is not economically feasible to mine this coal at the present
time due to a variety. of reasons. Although it is possible that the coal could be mined
someday as energy demands increase, technology, economic feasibility, and political
realities would have to be taken into consideration. There are approximately 50 million
tons of reserve coal in the Renton Coal Field, of which Renton Hill is a portion.
The mined-out coal beds are under most of the' area 'except in the south western
corner (contiguous to FAI-405). These mined-out coal beds are approximately
150 feet below the surface of Renton Hill . The south western corner is probably
underlain by, unmined coal . (Source: Map showing nonmetallic mineral resources
in part of West-Central King County Washington by William Rice; Map I-852-D. )
See Exhibit E-2 for illustration of coal beds.
A few years ago there was subsistance of a street in front of 611 Renton Avenue
South undoubtedly due to the collapse of an abandonded coal mine shaft. Several
truck loads of material over a period of time was required to fill the shaft.
The rate of subsistance has declined substantially and periodic r'esurfac'ing of
the street is necessary to fill the depression. See red dot on Exhibit B-2 for
location.. of subsistance.
2. Topography: Ths site has moderate to very steep slopes. The northerly portion
has slopes 30% and greater; the center portion has slopes ranging from 17 to
20%; and the extreme southerly portion has a 10% slope. See Exhibit E-3 for
slopes. .
•
4XHIS1T a -1
. GEOLOGY
-e vy.35/1 r.,r.,,rr'V.,%'` ,:' .... ° . • e• 1 :� . . LE6ENp
"Si (:,^ ),' , ;.(�}__ ,�.•[� :::: .: GE::• ••• •p�•• ; •• • (� • ,
•••••• AYt 1
91�1SF,�CtDGCr7ttr:: ?c i a
,r: Ili alb* ••p •••• j r ' ......... FI!I
•
•
' Y'11# 1 ,ie'Ve Vr'% ' 4:111,• . •• "•:.:.. •::::::Y.:, .. ,3 \
4,11" � yf. .. �0. • r �t � i• . j � i ;Q -��'�� Fov►+1a Leh! ` *1 � ni : ••
(0 sr tT ' .a x 4 ,, •••1 ••...i �,
I .a ,..:e :s
i.,2 I ' - it I.ff4,4A,s,:a ..•.• : , :; .•. .:. •••.••
rf ti • sipr ft• '] .04,..: a :'.7 : ' `: j a ,••••••lHC,raihl°
r. iiiii: ...:ii;iii:: -", ?j'....t4'' Pfe I, it
�r •s�•sb• y•• r
•I see'I •.N ...:D ::
. . •• .. I A 4 Dr:ft.
'/4_
•�';:r: ;fit► 4a ".•,••• • �i.11,® :::I :•d: C •.• „� �J1. 4/Or`SaI . ••••••• : iif. . .gr. '•.•r• ` •• •:: DD
r••F ••••• • I •••• •. •••:i: RENTbN HILL REaeneg
ti; 'j •.IL__ •••••••••• •• J• I •lYgo••Ir• •••• ••• `' Iltr e-=
ei • •s.'• ••• 71 'i
•S0 c�r4 e : err -.4.44•••
\ 7, cwi� ►'ii11ileWx T..�---
eliills
/� NORTH .
i�p GQ yob �'.-- =------- ------
•
•
EX f/181.T 2-
•
. /y/NED OUT COAL BEDS .
•
•
... ...:... •
........ .. tz
•• •.•' ••••.•••• •��•I•::::� • •F1: : •:••: LE 6.EN P
•s •••• •• •o:•••s • •i1•(1••••• •••• • .• •
A•
•• •.••• • •••••••• •• • ••••A•ei • ,•�•• �•;{,
,• ••••.•• • ••�•••,J' •'t1•• f� I� • ,,,i••wws'•
.•.•••.........•••• •7►2•450•••••••••••••••••••••••••• .
• •. •••••••. •• �!• •• •••.•, .•. �. '•• •.••,•• •• of ••••••
es ••••••• • .+tl•,I ••• ••tpe •••• ••• • r .r�e•••• • 1•••••4 p0 • 1 beds
• • •••••.• • •,• ••• :• y:'••:• ee•
.: •••••: ••• .4 •.••.•
/I • ••••s•• •••'� ••' �i •� h s,•
O3 • ••.•••• ••p••i •. ••••i��••la1••, ••• ..W ••�•• •,[f,
a , •..••••• rA'••..•W ••.••l• •.• •••I .�• ••• •
a • ••.••••• ••••r ••A y•II••�.•[•• •e• e�. «el• •• •
�� r •....•;• ' i•••• ff,,e•..p. •• ••1 •.• • •.. •
• se •'e.... • s•••i.IW••••(••••• T • •i}, .••,• •
Co ' •••••• t•••.• . et 14t ..I •U••d• ••c•
•• ••••••• •••••fits a •�••!••••• p•• •••,•,• •ee•• ••i••.
•
q••.••. •••• •••.•••••• • •� - . ••i]M
Li, ••.••• L •,••• •••••• ,�• u
•1 •••• a,••• ; 4:1—i•`s':e eA.Ia .C�!!.l.. .ti
r, (• •••• ••••.•• •••••e..e••••••. if 3 ..... .�
~ • li ••• •••.••.••• • • ••••••••.•.,
•
•e. •• •••••••• • ti.t>«'•T1 ••4• • +•r��•• •
\ %, •• e•••••••• • ;•••••• ' ••• I • a•• . '� .
z .••...••. ...Mor. •.. .•• 1,...�•.•
1.
F� •••••.•e •�..••....• ••• I •••• e.••.�• •
li
••••••••• .•I ftry"•cp 0e• •p 1�• ...•,lr�
•••••.••• •• ft •!• • s•• •••. •�••••••••el,
•••••• •• 1°13• J I ••. ••}r,••••4••\ I'
` psi,. ••••• • • •• ••• ••• ••.• . �EflTON ALL RE,•,•s
`i,, y . .• • •�1 I•. ••.•..•.••a
`"� �� •elk.r'e"eiY • ••:e...., ' ..e I.. •....•.•, o P""sueg
\ 'f;1` ..e e Q.w• a•...• • ••• • • ..•+Is• (Za.�-PL..;w
et
e.,(,S, G-. S �y- - .•••••••••e•••e•••••••• ,.••- NORTH
-,.•�•••••w••to ursine.---.. •_ -_ .
' I ,+ ,. 1 ` -. J 4- _ill ----� ` __ I
' 3/%® �1X ' X3.77�T H 33 - X _ SAVE p ,- .
+� .. - r • 1 EP17�N �,c r�.E1dr v
; Irr 1 1 ',. t ,. , I ' , 1 i ; ; ip 1 ((a
iil i ; , , 1 \\I
I 1 i '1 I`❑ I I . I yl ) ' I !Ci i I TH I:_j 11 I I ,
it i �. 1 I
, I I II 1 I
. , \ ;01\ III 4 ; so
•
/ / / i i J ' '' ( ' .. II 1 j '
J . • ' Nq'%c . I lei t 1 11 \ I ; I I tin • I l���
r
—� r .\ I I
��/=�'r'`,, ICI 1
' 1°1 MI ' / y Fij z� ,1 U 1i rj� I. l�,,f `I j i ❑ I x
, / 10,
/
, w l: . -
) '; ' /.J (?/ I`' , I WI alb 11.- =1 ❑ to '
0 � ,
'/, ` a, �.\ \ _ 3Qi'� 1 . ;LIti N \ o �� �I �i O O. �` ❑ ,' x f�1
` \ T -..__ ;'� _ D l ' lip
1 '� , , f-- .- 363 AVE 381 X-
�, , Icy I1 [� o � o d % I
44
' ' X \\ , / .' i \i I I I �0 I]
® ;' �— ▪ i ` ...�� N , I 1 I r'�. 11 I
ti) ,/ , / \ LI%° 4` .. '
-� :• .\ �� ��- I I ( �,. �\ r� i )11 i o 1 I . "\ i I I I
w ` \ . I) • 1i � I I \i Ill ii ❑
/ / / . t ,i....: .i , l\i‘ . \s.: - )\ ( / • ./ 4r7 1./,,. 1 l'•‘..'--lirx. -1-1 11_Ay__\ti 'I-.. i:)0r- - 1 x---
...N 1-1 7z),'-/ - ii4 I '
. \ )),‘ , : ' . li , . p ! ) . .
r / , 1)0 If . '
(%/ ' -,
, , I ` .... 17 t , i • I A'
I I:] / I'
/ -� x / I' - I ' '
/ ,, -7.------- ---.....- ). / 1 1 I , x X I • . -
1 + 1, \ 11 x__Ix_____,,x__,, 11
, .
r6.....,
/ . \,..„ \ i.
+/ / I �\� \ \ �� Ijis -.--% . I I
\
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE THREE
3. Soils: The site has four soil classifications which are illustrated on
Exhibit E-4. The northerly most portion is Beausite gravely sandy loam,
15 to 30% slopes (BeD); foundations for low buildings is considered severe.
In the south western corner is Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep (AkF);
foundations for low buildings is considered severe with moderate and severe
slippage potential . A small portion of the site by Grant Avenue South has
Arents, Everett soil (An) ; the hazard for foundations to low buildings is
slight to none. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15% slopes (AgC)
occupies the south easterly portion of the site; this soil has moderate
limitations for foundations of low buildings and a seasonal high water
table. Considerable erosion has occured on property (multi-family) to the
north of the site which apparently does not adequately control surface
drainage.
4. Vegetation: The site has alder, maple and willow trees with blackberry,
ferns, hazel and ivy for shrubs and ground cover. The vegetation is con-
sidered abundant except where the land has been clearcut for an apparent
road west of and parallel to Cedar Avenue.
5. Wildlife: Due to the surrounding development, the site would be suitable
for only small birds and mammals.
6. Water: There are two seasonal drainage ditches on the site. Both appear
to have their primary sources of water east of the site from developed
single family areas.
7. Land Use: FAI-405 lies to the west and lower in elevation than the site.
A Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line right-of-way is
contiguous to the south. Established single family dwellings lie to the
east of the site. To the north of the site are apartments and condominiums.
F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
Renton Hill was subdivided and, developed prior to the turn of the century.
When it was developed and for many years thereafter, it was considered one of
the nicer areas in which to live. This was due in part to being above. the
flood plain, having a. view, being at a higher elevation than industrial
activities, and a variety of other reasons.
Over a period of years the Hill began to decline. However, this trend has
reversed itself in recent years. Some homes were converted to apartments and
new apartments were constructed. During the early 1960's, FAI-405 was constructed
leaving only one access to Renton Hill .
In 1953 the City adopted a zoning ordinance which tended to segregate the single
and multi-family residences on the Hill . This helped contain multi-family to
Mill Avenue (along FAI-405) and minimize the spread of multi-family throughout the
Hill . During the early 1970' s a sense of community pride began to redevelope
which lead to cohesive community action. Eventually, a community club was
formed to represent Renton Hill .
The City of Renton and the residents of Renton Hill have invested considerable
amounts of money in the area since January 1976. Cedar Street between South 3rd
Street and South 9th Street was completely rebuilt with a new street, curbs,
gutters, sidewalks, illumination and overhead utilities were placed underground.
The project cost $200,162.04, of which the residents paid $43,310.11 through a
local improvement district (LID 293). Sixty nine parcels participated in the LID
which calculates to an average of $627.68 per parcel .
Since January 1976 considerable private investment has taken place on Renton Hill
including 5 new single family dwellings; one new addition to single family residence;
one new story on single family residence; two new private garages; one lowered base-
ment; and a new eight unit apartment. ehadnew
beenhomes
developed erected
were lots
shorthplatedat were
due either to demolition of a home, never
from a larger lot. '
4,.
i
—. ...-, -—
H 1 8 0 N .-
' 4..,evnti*P.,./;• .....„
' IPPPIPP .
4..., -...?,7/1,..iti,c.....-...
gi. JF .211.F ••••44,3/4,
•
i,. 44,,,, ....._ II ••••._
01I411 plow
5 ,Jkip,„..Avirat, \IL
Z.a SYR• . c21 isg - ..,.„--...., i.;,-,....., _ —
cr
•,...fito/g '99400
s-Jskor, 77itt N la LH 3)1 0 0 ..0 0 •••
,....0.0 il a ..
a 04 0 ::: .0 It ,zt b
1-1
,
2 0 ai
0 a
v
'I ,.
-......,. j
.-. ra, 0 0 cr'rmi 0 .',.. -5-,
I' "
t o 0 0 ci , ri "C) 0
-
(.1
'Il o A) IJI ° „V 1_j ;: A '6 "CI
1•1, 1
I 0 t":: CD k r-i
, 1-1 op
o 0 a ri GI
u (3 ;:i 0 k a
17 L 0 0 0 i: t r---1
—
•c
ti.„ ci) 0
tc, „ jo
tvam v-/-
M I, El N ) 19
il
sulpvPA 0 ri] 0 I) .0.0 0 1
.-z,J.v47 P
D a 0 0 .
! faEl
o .„ :
I
7 1.4119 9 VA a If eri
- o (17 ° 0 r,
0 0 ... o .1_2) :c3
li 1 Z,
S 4 Pi..7•1'7 C"7 Z .15. MI& .5
rn 0 a
0 0 CI 0
0 111
,..- 1.0 fri
0
NCri7§71...1 it 0, 0 0 0 ri
0, 00 • Mc, 0 0 U ao Li
a
o
s..zhegki9sznsvgw a N r2OS
1—ti IlilifiX3
HItION
,•,'`-i,'4,,,:-",'----'---..,,„ .t.: -.4•,',.,;'''i.(1/'-,----`,.,
,;.-r,•-•, -, `„r',-',, 'cr Leo/kf If;• A 10,4 ,th;;;......"
.c0.r.'or r•rz.... smerairsmia r-1: ,i .e1,,4 ;Vist . > " j? , i"....,,... ..1,,,/ A-r.t . !II. 0::::::::•:11.;•:..
ti 0,•• ci 7 mill * Pai4,,..,4,,t`t 1:fit.,, 14' 's, M.,„....__•:KEiiiiiiiiiiii:i:?
,-A... Aro 4.", -74-1, • i e::::::::::tire.:•::::::'
7 2;idNd CI ,....:t.::,,.::::::, nill b.,,, 4r.1 4..1 ''i
T.. .3y 7,11 N.04311 ..: :yi: •,:::...Plal- ‘ /s • • •:•:.:;•?%....p::,.. .
0 ...::i:::.:::::::,..:i::iiiiiim:::::iiiiii••1741 •1 O' e:e .e. '1 r' ..,."
r *:Y;•.:•.:::'''*:••. — --- —
2 0 q :::::::::::::.:.x.;:::::::::::`.:::::::::::::ti::::::>:::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:::i*:.•• .1'0
1 •:::::::::::0::::x:::::::::::**::•:•::1-i:i:i:::::::%:.:::,•:•:. ::•:::•:::::::•-• ce ' ;.9 e , i',1 1;:•..% ..'''' Z
"1-:,';:rt,z-z 0 D 0 i i.Miii i ii!iiiii.::::.tli:ilii ii.V::::i::'::•::i:•:f f in iiiii:iaia:." '% .1 e/: 1 0.%::::: 4 .01 a -art i.:.'ir.,,....1 ---- , •:,i::::.i:::::::i5.;::.:::i:ui:ii.:zix::i'5:•:::,ixi:;:::i:i.:::.:.iiiiii iii:Mg:gi:.. 1,39*(......:•:::% ::' P-..
al ..-a. N.,..s : ,,____ I •d,:*::.:.::::::iiii::.:iiMiiiiiiiiithMil:liWiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIiiIii:.::::. r. / %:•:.::.:,..:::::% :: ",
0 z A!'iii.:::?.:.;i:.iliiiin:•:iii::i:::3i...i.:::::.M:i.if::isi*::ii::;i:ii?::•:•••:%.:.••:•:.:%.:•:•:•:,:..0 i. .1 '•..*:0 0;fe ''' 4
k uu
, 7 1:-.4:::::miiii.....,:ii.. ...::iii,;iiiii:i::i::i:::-::::;.::::: :::::.ii.:::::i:::::i:::::.ggi*.1 . . •:•:.: ' 4
0 IA .*:igii::.::gii:.;.!::Mi.i:::.iiaiRei•.•:•:•.U:Mi::?::::•::g.i:.:::::-.4 P.I ?.f4 .I.4 :
::::::::::::::::::i.::•':•••:,.„...••••••• •••••• •••••..............• •::•••:.•••••••is iirc,,,).. 7 1"
4 V .'...4".. *:..A;:z• 0
CD I:iiiiiiii:i:i:i*.f:i::ii.::::i::::,::•:?:::ii:i::,ii:i:i:::r.*:-/:.*:•:••:'::•:::.::::::':':':.:*:.':
r. '
::::::::::..:::::::::::..:.:::::::::::.::::.::::.*:ff::::::::::.:.:...:::::::::::::::.:::::•:•:::::.::::::::::*- e r
.. ..ipc.: ..:::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::*::::•:*:::::::::::::.::::,::::::::::::::::::*:::::i*i::::% ' ki, , ''
.•.••••••••..........,...............x,....x.%,:....:.::.:::::.:-:f::::..:.:.:.:-• U •. ik ;r A) . 4
t ,
g ) § , ::::::::::::::::::: Lli cD ..i,M i"iliiiiinii::::R:: :;ii•:::i:nilii.':::::i::i':ii.i:iii i: :.:i:i::.*:::::m °'• r5c:„...,,,,..,.......:::..,...............::: ,:i:: :..:.::: fi-..:..i i:l.:....:.::•::::•:::•:....;i:. ,. rf -..._,V' a:r , *C
.1 7 ...giii:K:K:i z) 0 7'.j:INR:.:i ::::: ::i.i il::i.1::i.::.1:;i:':::2M:ii:: Miiiiiii.:iii*::i!:tic N. .-..ek • A
I] 0
2,;282,62,E 0
c u., \0 Eg •*.iii.i:::::::.::::::: ::ii::•:.i::::::::::•ii. ••::',•::::ii.ii::i1i..?:iii: i''.i'i:::::ii:i::i i;:i::.•:i::*if::,&tiri 2 "i-," ' .ogegosc.g
v , c, s,,g,,,, .?...::xiiniiiiii:iii:.?::gimiggi.fi:niii::::.::.:::.:.45, ...• - .1a..,.,-N-evt.e..e4,..3., .:<:,....i::::::::::...:.. ...,i:::::::::::::.;:i::.;:.:;:.....:..:.iiiii:i .y....:..,-..: ,,,„„1„ • - '`Wili...Pl
° '1'4 o j r 3 ";<::E:::::::::: ::::i.':, :::::ji,:::::::i;g:W:.::W::.:.. tZli.,V..=•#-- :i ' '-.es. 4
IV39a-1 —— ""•"'""'' '. ‘icri- -1,_ ' ijn., .; 1-4.'44.
.,..., 114 [7 ,:f.::,::::::::::::::::::::,::::::•:•:•:•:::•::•:•::•„45 .,,.NIS,it%. . . .4.4\0 ,
S 7/ OS
ligittXg -- „
)
• . .
--,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HE VG EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF Kt.NTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REcur4E
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE FOUR
Two short plats (two lots each) and one preliminary Planned Unit Development
applications were received by the City from Renton Hill since 1976. In addition,
a large tentative plat (2.45 acres, 93 lots) application was received on a parcel
south of and contiguous to Renton Hill ; this subdivision does not propose to
have access via Renton Hill .
Effective July 1 , 1978 low and moderate home owners will be eligible for
grants up to $2,500 for rehabilitation of their detached single family
dwellings through the City of Renton Housing Repair Program. Renton Hill
is designated as one of the City's target neighborhoods.
G. TRAFFIC:
Renton Hill is essentially a large cul-de-sac with one access, Mill Avenue
South. The Seattle Cedar River Pipeline right-of-way provides a secondary
access for emergency vehicles. This facilitiy was closed in 1973 at the
request of the residents of the Hill to eliminate the through traffic that
came to and from the Cascade area to the south. The residents of Renton Hill
considered the through traffic inappropriate and dangerous to the community.
The streets are rather steep and serious questions can be raised concerning
traffic safety if too many cars use the streets. Between South 3rd and 7th
Streets, Renton Avenue and Cedar Avenue average 9.2% and 7.7% slope respectively.
Renton Avenue has a short stretch that has a grade in excess of 15% between the
same streets. With the grid iron street pattern, a vehicle (and anything which
the vehicle might hit) can be in serious trouble should a serious mechanical
problem occur such as brake failure. '
On January 22, 1978 traffic counts were conducted and found movement of 2,650
vehicles during a 24-hour period. This represents 1 ,350 vehicles entering and
leaving the Hill each day.
Burlington Northern Railroad has a major east-west track accross Mill Avenue
South, the sole access to Renton Hill . During the 16. hours per day that the
Renton railroad station is manned, there is an average of 14 trains that pass
through the city. This does not include the numerous short blockages due to
switching activities. Blockage of Mill Avenue can be critical should an
emergency occur on Renton Hill while a train crosses Mill Avenue.
H. SOUND:
Sound readings were taken in mid May 1978 at six locations on or near the site
as illustrated in Exhibit H-1 . ' The detailed sound records are available on file
in the Renton Planning Department. The freeway is the major source of sound at
the western side of the site while airplanes, dogs, the city park, and other urban
sources were more important as the loud-sound generators at the eastern extremity.
Even at the eastern end, the freeway provided audible background sounds through-
out the site: Listed below is a synopsis of the findings:
dBA LEVELS
Site High Averages Low
1 79 76 - 65 63
2 66 62 - 59 56
3 73 61 - 58 55
4 68 ' 54 - 53 52
5 59 55 - 52 51
6 ' 61 56 - 44 44
Generally, the closer to FAI-405, 'the greater the sound. It is anticipated that
traffic will increase as growth occurs in South King County on FAI-405 and therefore
the sound levels on Renton Hill will increase also. Sleep interference occurs at
40 dBA; speech interference at 55 dBA; hearing loss with continuous exposure at
80 dBA, although some. experts believe hearing loss happens at a lower level . As
indicated by the above data, there is speech interference with outside activities
during the day and a potential Toss of hearing if exposed for a long period of time.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HLnniNG EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78,REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE FIVE
Sound inside a dwelling is generally 15 to 20 dBA less when the windows are
open and 20 to 25 dBA quieter when the windows are closed. Dwellings con-
structed on the site could experience sound levels that will cause interference
with normal conversation and perhaps sleep.
•
I. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer: There are existing 4 inch water mains located in Cedar and
Renton Avenue South and South 10th Street. An 8 inch water main is located
in South 9th and llth Streets. An 18 inch sanitary sewer line is located in
the Puget Sound transmission line right-of-way that could serve the site.
2. Fire Protection: Fire protection is provided by the Renton Fire Department
as per ordinance requirements. Any future development of the site will be
subject to the City of Renton standards.
3. Transit: Metro provides bus service along the periphery of Renton Hill .
Metro Transit route numbers 107 and 240 operate north of the hill on Mill
Avenue South. Bronson Way South is served by bus route number 142 and route
number 155 serves Main Avenue South. All of these busses are within walking
distance of Renton Hill .
4. Schools: . Renton Hill is served via school bus by the Bryn Mawr Elementary
School, and Dimmitt Junior High School . Renton High School serves Renton
Hill .
5. Parks: Phillip Arnold Park, a neighborhood park, is within walking distance
of all areas within the site.. Three additional city parks, Liberty, Cedar
River and Jones Park, are approximately half a mile north of the site.
J. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1 . Section 4-706, R-1 Single Family District.
2. Section 4-709A, R-3 Medium Density Residence District.
3. Section 4-725, Amendments.
4. Chapter 22, Parking and Loading.
K. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS:
1 . Land Use Report, 1965, Residential , Page 11 , and Objectives Pages 17 and 18.
L. IMPACT ON NATURAL SYSTEMS:
The rezoning of the property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems.
However, any development of the site will disturb present soil and vegetation
conditions, increase storm water runoff, thereby increasing the possibility of
erosion, and add to the noise and traffic levels. These conditions may be
minimized by the application of proper development controls.
M. SOCIAL IMPACTS:
The development of the site for residential use will increase opportunity for
social interaction.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE SIX
N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended (RCW 43.21C), a declaration of non-significance
has been issued for the subject proposal .
0. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building Division
2. City of Renton Engineering Division
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4. City of Renton Utilities Division
5. City of Renton Fire Department
6. United States Geological Survey
7. Renton School District Number 403
8. Puget Sound Power and Light Company
9. Pacific Northwest Bell
10. Department of Ecology
P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. The proposed rezone, to R-1 is consistent with the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan which designates the site and area as single family
residential .
2. The existing zoning around the site is R-1 to the east, R-3 to the north,
and GS-1 to the south. The freeway (FAI-405) to the west is not zoned and
acts as a physical barrier. The R-1 and R-3 zones are developed as zoned;
the GS-1 zone is developed as an electrical transmission line which pre-
cludes more intensive development. These circumstances together with
other elements appear to establish the subject site as a single family
area which requires protection from other uses to protect the existing
single family area. (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, 1965, Objectives
1, page 17; Policy Statement, Summary, pages 9 and 10)
3. The 'goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Report, page
17, objective number 1, states: "Prevent blight by protecting resi-
dential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltra-
tion of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay
and obsolesence, and prevent the development of orderly growth pat-
terns." The majority of the Renton Hill area is an existing single
family residential neighborhood. Rezone and development of the
subject area to single family residence density, either by standard
subdivision or by P.U.D. cluster-type development, would be compati-
ble with the existing neighborhood and consistent with such objective.
Development to higher densities would result in infiltration of incom-
patible zoning, land uses, and such Comprehensive Plan objectives.
4. The Comprehensive. Plan Land Use Report, page 17, also has as objective
number 4, "Protect property values within the community for the benefit
of its residents and property owners, through the effective control of
land use and the enforcement and application of building and construction
codes. " The proposed rezone will control. and regulate the land use of
the subject area to a degree that is compatible with other property in
the area, thereby encouraging and strengthening the livability, both.
physical and social , within the existing neighborhood. This would
further the present character of the "Hill" as highly desirable single
family residence area.
5. Such rezone to R-1 will continue the present trend for new single
family residential construction and remodeling of existing residences
in this community, which further indicates the desirability of the
area as a separate single family residence area. It would, therefore,
be consistent with the objective number 6 of the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Report, page 18, to "encourage the development and utilization
of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best
interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness
and desirability as a place in which to work, shop, live, and play. "
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE SEVEN
6. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, page 18, clearly states as a
method of implementation (number 6) the need to "conduct planning
studies on problems of current interest or need as conditions change
and revisions or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are deemed
desirable." Conditions have changed in the area through the continued •
'construction, revitalization, investment, and community involvement in
the area as a single family neighborhood, as, well as the lack of•adequate
access for multiple family residential being developed, and the Overall
attitude of the legislative body and the community toward the retention •
of a viable and significant single family area through the revision to
the Comprehensive Plan.
It is further noted in this implementation section that "the purposeful
and consistent attention to the overall purposes and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan will produce continuing and long term benefits for .
the community. " The proposed rezone is a reflection of the "overall
purposes and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan" through the proper
use of land use regulations and zoning to protect th,e citizens of the
community and provide for orderly and compatible growth trends. •
• The "continuing" benefits to the community will be reflected by the
•
proposed rezone consistent with' the Comprehensive Plan. The aspect of
planning as a ""continuing" process is important. As the City grows and
changes, in its physical .character so also do the attitudes of its citi-
zens. The' Comprehensive Plan and its implementation methods (i .e. ,
zoning, capital improvements, arterials and streets plans) must reflect
these changes to be an effective planning tool .
7. The Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan, defines the ideal neighborhood
as an area "consisting of a relatively solid pattern of homes, linked by
by quiet streets and centered around .an elementary school and park. "
Although this concept has changed somewhat in recent years, the Renton
Hill neighborhood basically reflects such a concept. • This portion of
the Plan also states that "in planning neighborhoods the creation Of '
residential districts free of overcrowding influences, arterial traffic
. . are important objectives. " Such objectives will be significantly
upheld by the proposed rezone.
8. The Policy Statement of the Comprehensive Plan, page 6, E. , TRaffic
• Ways, States that "It shall be the objective of the City, of develop or
require the development of its traffic ways in accordance with their
intended use. Generally, heavy and fast moving traffic will be routed
• around neighborhoods with only minor residential streets bisecting
them. Right-of-way width standards for different classifications Of
streets shall be those developed in detail and contained in the Arterials
and Streets Report of the R.U.A. Comprehensive Plan. The construction of
streets shall be related to need and funtion as determined by traffic
engineering studies. " Reference to the Arterials and Streets Plan as
well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance, indicates that this access to
the subject area is not adequate for any use higher density than single
family residential . Even as a new single family residential area the ,
access would be questionable. However, , it is one of the last remaining
large undeveloped areas of the "Hill" and, therefore, would not create
significant additional traffic problems if developed as single family
residential .
9. Access to Renton Hill is restricted to one entrance that is subject to
blockage by trains. Several of the streets which provide access to the
various areas on the "Hill" are steep, laid out in a grid arrangement,
and as such should not be overloaded. The grades Of the streets present
a potential hazard not normally found in a residential development.
Also, one street has had a small section subsidence. (Comprehensive
Plan, Arterials and Streets, 1965; Purposes and Objectives of Study,
pages 2 and 3) Both Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South have
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE EIGHT
a right-of-way width of forty feet with improvements less than that
which is normally required. Standard residential access streets are 50
to 60 feet in width. Due to existing structures and improvements, there
is little likelihood that these streets can be enlarged. Given this
situation, the proposed rezone would have fewer impacts to the existing
streets than the existing zoning. In fact, the Streets and Arterials
Plan, page 5, states that "in the planning, design, and location of the
major street system, consideration should be given to esthetics and
community amenities in order that the system may provide attractive
as well as safe, efficient circulation routes, and do the least damage
to adjacent land uses and improvements. Conversely, the design and
location of adjacent improvements should present the least possible
interference with the traffic carrying capabilities of these traffic
ways."
10. The Streets and Arterials Plan also states as objectives (page 3) :
a. Provision for the safe, efficient and convenient move-
ment of peoples and goods.
b. Arterial and street patterns compatible with and com-
plimentary to the general land use plan.
c. Adequate and safe access to allow convenient and effi-
cient utilization of abutting properties.
The proposed rezone would be consistent with these objectives by
reducing densities and resulting traffic volumes and providing for
land use more compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and roadway
system. Also, the introduction of any larger street system into
and through the area would be contrary to these and other Compre-
hensive Plan objectives. (i .e. , Policy Statement, Comprehensive
Plan, page 4, "These trafficways should be so designed that they
function efficiently. . .their operation should not conflict or
interfere with the functions of the residential neighborhoods.")
11. It is apparent from the attached exhibits that the site has physical
characteristics such as slope, mined-out coal beds, soils, and existing
heavy vegetation which create potential problems in development and
which should be considered when reviewing the size and intensity of
development. Certain types of higher intensity development may in
fact create potential hazards. Therefore, it would be in the public
interest to minimize such possible hazard by proper planning, zoning,
and development controls. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report
designates the site as 25% - 40% slope with certain portions over
40% slope. The Plan indicates "that extreme caution should be exer-
cised in the utilization of these potentially dangerous areas for
residential sites." The lesser density of. the R-1 zone would be
more compatible with such objectives and present fewer hazards,
especially if developed by P.U.D (Planned Unit Development) within
the single family residence density which would provide for clustering
of units within more appropriate areas of the site, preserving steeper
areas, significant trees, and natural open spaces. The Comprehensive
Plan, Policy Statement, page 6, infers such a relationship between
land use, topography, and other physical conditions of the terrain
when it states that "properly designed plats related to terrain conditions
will be pleasing to the eye, economically sound, and safe for the residents."
12. The site is subject to loud sound levels, especially from FAI-405. The
Department of Ecology recommended that performance standards be applied
to sleeping areas of the dwelling to permit sleep.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE NINE
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based upon the above background data, analysis, and the Comprehensive Plan
• recommend approval of R-1 zoning for the subject area. It is further
suggested that reasonable development of the area can and should be pursued
by means of a. P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development). Existing vegetation and
other natural characteristics of the site should be retained as much as
possible and incorporated into site planning, design, and development.
Access shall be limited to existing streets and approved as part of any site
development. On-site soils and geology investigations should be conducted
to determine whether the site is safe to develop; and if it is safe to
develop, to obtain recommendations on how to develop.
�/ /
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : CiL - - I
�
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : _j I�i /5—i5; k;ecjo
p ��
Comments : / /
p, A/1-e J4.,,�acf Lc� u / ��� CL/<- / ,f/i��✓
l ..._ r
44%)716 --./,/;%/7X)
Signature of Director or Authorized Opresentative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : �iir4-`--
Comments : a4
4
- A5GW-- a ige
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative , Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REA!to
04\A
. - - -..f .... MIND .. __ _'
rr. .1 ;i<� /✓?S •- G.l7r,• a� -- (. /.Jo /:� rJy ^r•: i
I.r �l/ / .'✓,�� �'cZt'7i))Cc�
< •I enr ,,.-. � rZiv h/I � 'LJ7! ' J�F7"� ' ' G.J/ </:Jiy,
cl;re:.:a4.siJe.,2 Ir c1 -�•' �i.. . t 'c. rr /Yt / G7 CC' e
•
�!J cy;.t re r/ •1 /yam:- r.'.,�•"l a; : .. ., .e .,y..I .. Zt lCi let. GY•c?r"-'O�:L I`�/.s72G� 1
a:' t'r t- ! • ,,1: Ct.1ru, • /I,/ /I; • 1 c...J. c. T7,4
I d ;
J.. '_i ',�,; I,, ir,; -/ ':';_ `.. '; r��.t�. �lr•f�
I'' 77 1
•
s&ae-
COPY OF THE ABOVE MEMO ;
(ok' d by - 6/5/78)WCG
Engineering Department
Gary Kruger , Planning Department
Subject : Renton Hill Rezone
The drainage basin encompassed by the proposed rezone area ,
and . a large portion of already developed portion of Renton
Hill , empties into an already overloaded system. Any
development in this area would require extensive storm water
detention and/or other means of controlling the run-off .
The rezone as proposed would in effect reduce the possible
impact of storm water run-off over the present zoning .
(Signed-- ) BOB. BRAY
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: ® Finance Department
IIIFire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
4 Public Works Department
4)1 Building Div.
1:) Engineering Div.
Traffic Engineering Div.
® Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his
designee)
z -rA• fe,-eir-/K _2L42,-,- -(f4L-rur
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 5/-3 ' 8 Application No . : R -/73 -73
Action Name : ,mod,,. 4,e., C ,,...-, e ,R__
Please review the attached. Review requested by (date ) :Jc4.0.0. .24/9>8
Note : Responses to be written in ink.
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : OL,D&
Comments : 7
7Ae -117 f.6 o�tt� Katz �� . 6 i ist/ .,@ [J_G•,C..-scd/
t •
A.' el tier--,r---- .- ----:1 6--?y
Signature of Director r Authorize Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : y4.7 „t ,:e,i--,i).17
Comments : .e_Sc_t, ;�`r. 0
C2,14 .
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : 7-a Jti c / ki,� /),,,.-ci
Comments :
d
.: ‘4/2ff
Signature of Director or Authorized Repr sentative Date.
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
% Department:
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
.
PROPOSED/FINAL ECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANC NON—SIGNIFICANCE
Application No . R-178-78 0 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-351-78 0 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal City initiated rezone of five
contiguous parcels consisting of 12 . 1± acres from R-3 to R-1 .
Proponent CITY OF RENTON
Location of Proposal Renton Hill
Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department
This proposal has been determined to ® have Ox not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is .
is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
non
Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance :
This negative declaration only applies to the rezone of the subject
site. Additional environmental review will be required as part of
specific site development review.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final )
declaration of non- significance :
Responsible Officia , Gordon Y . Ericksen
Title P nin . lir: or Date June 5 , 1978
Si gnat lrjZ �Y
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
\ 4
, ,-;---,-t - z • . V in \ i ) uL,. /. ,x--..-.....& s .:-.- .7:\..> _-_•...,.:_,:,---1.::.,__;,.-:..._-..cy.. ..; ki.t:,1
‘,7' --.. ._.0 • :, •‘,o 1 '
, .,LANT •1 I'.‹ _ _ 2, . ' Sworn / ii.\--,...;,--;:., ,.., ,- . e-,.,;,•.•, :,7 ip
.\•,.4-- . •••z..\'-'.; • I
\.
..1., 0: .:0 ado / .---- • , .. 7 1r1.1
' • .. 1••• .' ''' " FM X 41
'‘0\;' • ':
_________\ ..,\ .•0 • I _ ,
•V I • b• •
I " ' /....' .‘• r- - ,Al 1.'.> • s‘• A ,„,.•.tt A•,.\1/./..,. I
• • .. . '.\ . ..k's , ,A''.,.( ' '..."' ' ' ' _
PF/A0Eul F..41E,Dt.zseE A: • -.„,..„, ,,../,
•,`7 •_• \/.
\,,•1 't --- IA .:1. 1:1-. E ..T.W. • ,- 4. •,..‘ ,,-•„ - ,., . „.N „ , .. .. ,,, .. .
. 1,-e 09 ' s r;•• A'''• ' • •' i '.+. •. ' ' ' -, '
I „ , - , :1-- •:I A \ . • A
‘ ' \ m lon rim lime D • \•
i 14. . , ‘ , ' . \ , . ') , '' • I •
) I il . '--- 11 11 "roir3 I r 1...101 ./'"\JA :' ikj, \-.•/ . . • -
a'..j i•jj ., ..trz: trejmus INID ,
\ \.,..,, i A rt..I.- •• ,„,
•. ----...,,.....___ ./. ,..,;',.
._.Th V.,\ 5rAO/UP.4)) / •• ',;n.f. r/t-_ ._'•••.. _. . ' rialliTi_r_ _._---- r-. ;,;i:/;77,7--/-0,:',. 7 / i/I um \ 1
\,,,\
ow sweeno ,..1
.71-:‘ / 11 ,
\\\ • r, -'... iii). - ._
CI.Ap ti‘'.., . .-- r >. rIM 11139:1=1 __, • \ \ •-•- i
ri.IMINI111 • /,i Pit
lir \\
' , , H..i42-,v,_r.. :::: _,:1 7,ra 1,,,,,m .. . 1 . MA ON AVE ' ...i.......1.E! ..
\\\\ / - \
. '\ \ \ •
\\ i so.= ::..:: ,
.t , , • .• 3 "-•1" _
i ' i i'' -.-3M '....: ' ... •••..,
7 . I 7...,_ _-
, _ ..
., . //1/ ' / • 2
, , s
\
,
,
\\ . / "? - ••••••• _ L.
Pa i 4.4.- .i ,.-1 •,, 1E,, ,-,
.•,----, ..- .• -_ .7:! c=f- --'-- --1/-_.i.///,..(111 .,
.. .
i , ,. ,........,, .. .,. . ,
. _
... _ .
\ ....
:2....,,_... , . ,
, ss
I/17 ' / c-— _.__,d- - • ., ,
CM IIIM ------4 1'1 •1111 -11111 .,
1 •. / AVE._ '-" \ OVIIININIF4tt \ ,
' \
En Mr MMI __5_S
,.4.1,1.i!1,•.,--- -,.....:__.-1.--, ,- ! 1_74 ril !! .,- so • Am
, \
\'• •\ . ,•
r r I • 1 -•;-"if• 7 ' I 1- t I 1 I
CEME TERY‘
_______
—
, . /
...,,..._. . ._• •—_,•_, . , i rosw AYE /. Ws,!t.//!---- 1 / /7 \ Fi
I an h."ot/LIBERT Y (IV x / i
AirouvEr
- , .:1 . _- `--- l' L-1 .:7_1 r cm 6.,,7 C.. ^PIN • I . / /
' I
1
1. , 1 . • __ __„ _, - ' i-='- NES
PARK. PARK
iiiir:•14111h,b 1 '. 1r19‘ / / /\ In: Al,
% 1
._,. ...A.
3 enDOR ..W,POR ...±: -._ L._ emmu ., •‘4.`"°•fW mot ' ' - / _.,..,/N-..._ tr.... R././ RENTON
EMMY illfiNEI • ,
- -------- 7:6-----
, --° 7- 1I1i--,1 ----5•1
- 4
•z._-_-_-._!_-_-:,,_
', .• - •.‘,I I, %,IY,,/,/
/
/
r-f-,4••• ,i,-1.i I • . _ W MO., ' 't 1 It\
• 1
I 11 -1 r.-F- -1--, , 1,T••••/.7:'-....zi, . ariNn,....,.., ,• dr .
,. Alginli t.......- . - ,... • 1 ,1
___ __1_1_1 _ ,_11,,.,1 ',,,,, ,,,l,.1 .!,31.a.___,, _____ , AvE : !,• / . , , , %
.,,,,.-,TiT.1 , ..-•ism, >, . ,, i UP II i::: 7. .
, _1r
• 1 % t
. • . hc- -MI • - . t \
c..\•„"\\,., .
• I N-•
p,....[ • _, !„s1 , .4 c,inii, ,. ink cm .
. • , , , _
1.1_,!...1 .4--„_!-. •• AVE :1111( ....dr, 29 •
• . Ali•
•*kr. \ , . ' • , 1, 1, _______,
5\:;..i.-
---
'
.). _ ..,.„_ .. :),._ i , ..,__ .,, rc...1T-1 i•_. :; ......1 . ' . 'N '
; '- - - ••- 'V..t ,..., - W 3..- ... fidol., 1 r: . ... _
. .c.
1 — --i.1_, --') .4 ' rk - .- E , 1 ,,- 1 gum 7 i" \---,A- • ' „.. . , , 1 , ,
1 I ",
"--'6-.--11-.\fl 1 tl--'!,•=".•••••: l'"j•T'. ' 41 1-6- " -.• AV.133 . . A'. • \
. ZS till .
" , I
t.' 13-',-1-')____,,,,-. 7\-P",:r1, r. E. i I;-4_,!;.:•:::.IN t •• OM M1133
• . \ *te .›-N<• ' , • • •-•"---.
, . • : -----1------- ---__—\
1 1•''
s • 1."341MIER' .• '%. se!--1 ,4 0.-e-''rr7".'''k'
, MAIM, , ..- ••• • --C I 'I 'It %,
,.._. •Z -
14 " ,."•47---,0 . '...' • I WIZ '4; ' I ' "I - ,..... •• ,... ---. \ .p". .•,
MID I '
\ t'i!i. :g'iR' -.; _:t •*- ....t)::-.- 1-.1 .....C. -E:: e
A . :...mi ---1.0-••••-• ... ---' •. %. • L 1 , •
\\ 41 -"tX•flE1 :'• -•• . it- . ±- " MUM •
' AB I ri PM .-. no____, . ‘
11.73-11-1, -14::-N EH = 4 41 A 121-
1 1 n n
, F.14`1T1E-1'17----1 .. ff-7 A ..,, il IS 13 i OM•__-_,' .'•'--„. - _.:::_;,--1
M.'S: r•• .. NV lz' '-I ___—_—_----_---_________- le ----4—
_
r 4 „„____— ----.±L.../_____. 7,__Sr.:..a1-7 ,,•;.,:,. , ,
),
� il:t S w IiOTN ST
/
,t ;l.0^,
17 • RTAIL "HE ,1.11.K01� 1 FREO NELSEN i
`i4Z ` a EL alU t .� JR HIGH
-t1 : W so.'• ARK' • SCHOOL
le t,.'
5' 1 • ,
1 °fi^c 'j :'�, �� 4 • 'RING'GLE .
' 1 fi ,
,a,x . 4+. ~ t G,� , ELEM.SCHOO SE
�44 c g .4 t 1T117` �„ �� 1 EVrcH S. W s
'S' T #i*di E,3•
sT ' ma
p S 27TN ST W ea
3
. _'" ' a 'p 4 p ,O $E IS$TH $ ,TH ST= us
W "' r *;� O ,I,f ♦ •N n
O N "Or0.?r;; TM VP. 1rt
ti ,
O 1L "ra; 4 w ' iiiSt 5 i Z I . SE •
.� C�..� ,..A . { ��� W
• ;y`, • ow II M
sl5%9y
` W
a 7 j 1 * t 4 *E 170TH:ST
J' n;i2, p •` 8 b O
•
,,...-.," , • .
:41
l.
3, ,v
•r44' •
._ v•4 n 1 h • ::•..i.i ii; • •I 'I I i{ 17311E1 S1
W ;"y 9a: • iTN O t i•.:::::::L: :::". :.,::,::,:11 1111 �' I III Nth!,
J % ;!e,'4 .1 ST $g !NUN! .; .• •�::: I . l �1 I i '0s{ .
J s�y ^:»r . r g 37T 174T iiiiiii:i. ',III I� •I A'u,• ilsl
•
a y ,fin n...... iii r
.i •• 6
�' '- 9>.' N,Sn t Tr Y\;5:A1' - es■i °•••••Jfp::::::_:�. :::j III Ip j
;��� ; 1■■ati ' ,r 'r'■3'1 p o■+ +y� iii v::::::�▪ : !lit I�1�.f 1`I{ I, ?s2{�
:aii�' .iiiiiii;ii;t.,
.. rl �'•-,h:3�y ••1 �y f ••::L• i'f:::'ii •• I`ill,r I .�.. :fl.•
•
E � �/ 7T11� K ,t ° F3i:iii ;:li* .i• .: .: W
iM 1 ,`:1!"F •■ ` ;:.•::., ! :sii J:.:tiii• i! '•':, if'sl3ei
.,`\,• •.f e•1 i• •,;..:ii :::, iii•i•Sfi i•..• .i• '�iIM
IIIIIIIPPIP9III11-a IT.S A'.,:�"'•;:•:w ;Ii.:::=11:.:.;. OP'' ::ii �•:S1I:f1:41 1 tl...:„ :....
ii i`,,•0•1' e S� f.. f ••f . •f...ii: : f:ps::i•is.....{i;..�. ..{.... is _
••••I,t ,:' .h• a, 7 .•. f •y • .••.::iiii;: ,J.N.:..:.•N s{{i1 in \ �• 'r
1 •NUR:.^l w.•1 I.!!OBI • W .� ,' ,/ 1 j1 .`.s:::::::? iite,.{•:s::•sl \ 8 O
• 1■R3' h'. �' .t! : ii5i:f . ti:11{Ii11%ir• ' .. .
• •wI sip•■ 'is a;117.ii r \ .., sE,..
iii WW1:.
• •.•.� ■a■ ,_,. i�ijgi .T
1�111111111' ••.lt•+..=:Miii OM '" ',. �\ se 1sOTNh
..aLa►.-�r•r1••• ■ S; • .0
a� •iuumuo i ...•.••rim. i. s . ' SE 1111ST'C.
111111 ert i k( . : ` S
• 11111111111•"•Ioi•Llhi11111 '. '
n. ir.Rt:••Vws•a . u.
a. ; • . •
I.-di
• •..:.•3
' 7.30 E?is,
\'. 4,
•
. • ? "nA,
' y, F�zr S E 1 ST
•
,•.e.
S E 1d7c4
•
S .OU. TH RENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA .
•
• (AS RECOMMENDED BY- THE PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 10, 1977 ) . .
•
IIIIIIIIIII COMMERCIAL 11I PUBLIC USE/QUASI PUBLIC
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE . e.
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ' f-) GREENBELT
111:11 LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE <' ; PARK SITE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COLLECTOR
. MAP II •
.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO . 2196
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Renton,
Washington has recently recommended changes to the Comprehensive
Plan within certain areas of the City, and
WHEREAS such review and recommendations include an area
in the City generally known as "Renton Hill" as hereinafter more
particularly described, and
WHEREAS it has been determined by the City Council and
the Planning Commission that serious problems may result in said
area if unlimited construction were permitted for any multiple
dwelling, commercial or industrial purposes , due to insufficient
and inadequate .street access ,circuitous traffic pattern, means of
ingress and egress, and such existing Froblems may seriously affect
the public health, safety and well being of the community, and in
particular the residents within the hereinbelow 'described area, and
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Renton has passed
an Ordinance changing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for said
Renton Hill, and
WHEREAS the City Council has referred .the subject of zoning
on Renton Hill to the Planning and Development Committee and to the
Land Use Hearing Examiner, and
WHEREAS it is' deemed to be in the best interest of the City
to continue a moratorium on certain construction pending completion
of the present studies and reviews, including public hearings thereon.,
and
WHEREAS the subject. of rezoning of certain property on
Renton, Hill has been heard by the Hearing Examiner, and.
WHEREAS it will take additional time for the Hearing
Examiner' s decision to be rendered and for the appeals time to run,
:: NOW THEREFORE
y
=ti i {
,f ice . '.'•
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION I : The above statements and recitals are hereby
found to be true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II : In furtherance of public health, safety and
general welfare, there is. hereby declared a continuation of a
moratorium for the construction, improvement and alteration of any
multiple apartment buildings , commercial and industrial facilities
of every type and nature, for a period of sixty (60). days from
date hereof, relating to all properties affected by a change in the
Comprehensive Plan and subject thereby to a potential rezone
contained within the confines of that area generally known as Renton
Hill, in particular described as :
All that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 17,
Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E.W.M. , lying east of FAI
405 and south of Chicago-St. Paul Milwaukee and
Pacific Railroad. Together with all that portion
of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 20 , Twp. 23 N. , Range 5
E.W..M. lying east of FAI 405 and north of Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission line
easement excluding those properties along Mill
Avenue South extending in an easterly direction
1/2 block more or less to the alley located
between Mill Avenue South and Cedar Avenue South,
north of South 7th Street, as noted on the attached
Exhibit A.
The aforespecified moratorium shall not apply to existing
apartments , single family or duplex dwellings or the renovation,
repair or maintenance of same.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th day of June, 1978.
'elores A. Meqka, ty Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th day of June, 1978.
Earl Clymer, MayoItioro em' ' .
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. W ren, City Attorney
,.,',' ..- (I' ...- . t 0,`:, iS!*1 '' tilf;'' "1".' ?i,e•;al '.4,- ';4:1: 10 I tli \Ill " ll' /ili.
'''"i/ • `
% ,1, . .
.• • a/ nor • , '-'',-a.g 41/19P! I :.,.....) , ,
„,„„. ....1 14, • ......,5,
. • „Eg. .ti• . .. ,.. .2 AL4trrr,...... -N., -... . •
is , •.
.. , , •
..rup IN IM"
--a girl ,114,114.. ___ 7-1. ......... .44,
.I. 6Ellgr /7
# , MI NI 441.
t'4S4
..• •:, 41. it. 44 Sit, 1111 or al• .‘ 4.. lin.•614 6- i '.
or. -se Or -.0 • JO in-' .lis ••......... 1 /
N=I liill :v. •• A ' " P^MI °6446 _.. , IT'Ir. Ill Z. CZ .. -.,•1-2,2 „0,. • / •
‘s ....... ...
.''`....
. L 1111111.. -141•5•": %; -I°7. .--.2 Jag. , ,/ 'I.
''.' •:'• IN . . lit gnu" :4114 irr :::on, i---1,!! :RI EL- . 7 i A _ tit . (.......A..... ....5
-lb a• 'ye Not
1T, v'ill H 4
lo igi -m la "11=I
.. *
*., .1.1.-
-te
.144.11/41 11.64•. 4141444M1.4145
010 1,- ' ,
...
- -
.... 1)111 - IL .7.7, •-•' 41
Y :. ffkt, \
."•:,:•11 , ..".: ^
:•:';':•1';', ': : :::: * 14.11'....,-. _,.
iirl -op mmow y . . . - ir, %IP
r sr slib740,4,-..; . 1
kit
Alp IN ....tri . wig.4 ."
Wl• II W 1111 I•—•
I I .11 40 4414.. ; "" . ter Iii
:,,Li•• um. .1. . sm IriAtri eon gm
L.."•t-' •am-All - • ""k LmERry i ,
rim.'aro NS::;-Ini`,..; '
— .
1
, . 1,iri•i 700 I i
Pt 1 IIIIIIIIIN • ',... 1 1 It
•,'"L, ay -Er. rm,m1 iim am'EA • "
•
CEDAR RIVER laii 91:r rirr'ylillis..-2. , ilcmcrAftErNEERry .
*
\ :1"‘11
. OM • '
'
.;., . ii.s...r.,1 ims....A. mr,• ,.. . rob i. all „4610 tili 1/
. 7111141 Ma. MY • Slis%44,44.,. ,
42114•4111 MEW ."..) PARK \• d'Aiiiiilillik
.
.
-•;.- ..-•:-.....I .
11•11 s • 1 1 1
..-' ‘"'' ' el"1.1 - fts..11114e" 1=Irr" HALL ,"'" , .s.--------.-------------, •
i t
.; ..__Er, rap min rim or au..,_,irE_ ...via=, 464...._ _- , -------•'N't.„„.. .
,..,.,,t, ' yr ,•18 par, moor 2.>..41'.•' Ai;irri ,,,,,./ .. ..... „4.---".• •----, C.6.,, •
I
. I
rir.M11 11•10.,'Ian ..Ek•;tar
•..... '4-- me me. is or , • •=1 mil cue sr • .,A,,''. :...;-,-,., ---<'.. ef),41 zni : 1 %4
, i I
•
l''''''..J ( 4 a. tx. .L,Ti.,..i,---7=-7 i-ei,,,,,.." ...1210'--Ii..-i...-4.q.,i,,,,,,. .-.--..., - c,7_, R i . 4...,,,,- . i •
....._ , %
. . 1
• 111P/V7 71r .
. , I
r,I. Pill iiilli. " 0 (16111&33- ;w11.1 "ILI' ''' . " ..1 '';'.43'51.!Al.'i',"4 •° ''4 ,,-..,'-';',114,+%i •°"' ":8' .*.' '•- • . , 1
. 1.
:',' ow" t, --,m-i ..1.11111 ' 16.0 ri... ,1 - 11.111 " Mr: 1M....1:"1 '13'0.::.*1'4°''1'"4.. .a it,1$ •• ,,,t*90 4. \„
, • .4=7.• 'MD'4111, . .....5 . .___ . - g- ' ....;%.'1-;,4.t.,:i .• -I.. -. lc-,-i, • .• . • ,
.I., .met 'ME Sr 4 WI .P.4•• Ali :• i .imi .),r-,,, .., $ •$ $1 $0 ..$ $ .1= a 0 .,,
,, ; eo min rim owl,... r3im. CIIP • •Ir"tit'.)::t.l.'41 ' 4* • " t" -'.., .
'..;..••.rid:: MEI.W.4. ram.,-...'"s' .ipl.11 2. . 4 Jr. ,......,...,,..,..,....1.,/,6•„ 4 • „ „6, . .,4.0 6..!....„%6„ • ' .
, 1
. . . 1_ agr' W.." . .a-.-t---1- 15-- 4 . ;WI . l'-y1,'.5..V,......Z.,',• .6 4 .t5.•6••4 - ...4 It•%II 0 4 '' . .
• . . 2=17-, tdi w* '- ..* 1" :1,e4 k 7-"Ii1,•';•.'51"::1.-.•:;../)It•t•'• 7° -t;'tt*.*• '"-'7,;.. 0* ..r,•" .' • ;
1 .. 'A7f,";•1.1',..:7'.••,,i?.'"`i.'4 Ii•,!'4•• 4..4%5 •‘','\.1 'n • I 4:•• ( ',, . '
'ti•'..,'t,_.•.4 .-q'.-.4• • ••4 * .5 a 6• 1.---
: •;'''.x iiif (7 .4. . WI g;.. ' . A 4IE: Illi ....,.. -- ';....1,4?..C...{..1yVs.,,I.:, 4 4 a 4„.4.5 4 4 „d ..*•,..,-.*:...,*,,.*„. , ; ; . i
1,' :::.; :: •••• ' I Air" filiCIIIIL IA 44,1 ' ,j176 INC atm INV T.L.: - iR,.*,,,,,',",:.'e,",*.',,oh.vii etr,*...,ii .** ,VI„N ._.%. ..t, ,,. _ N ., .. .
I , :4 44000,01 1.,....r,-helpielr.. 113 t g :, ''c Itc,o.soph. ' -----; ',..i-,••••,:p:1';.,-)..:.!..)..),,4.11,,:9'''..'i,-1,1`..1'4',l'•11,10 1*.•.',.!..0,,,":p'‘'0 ii,2 or 14e.'. 4..t1.4. 't ''' ' (::::::". ' '
1 ""7 .• . :1.v. .....„,71:,:11'.4.**"" '" -,.17.,,,lt:':"1•i:.;)"."1 "..,,- " t -4, 1 . . ' , :''.:•!"-i ''. : ill la-. cm,wit-,,, • , . mil EFL .,„.,..„,..,.n..,,,.,, ' ::•.,. ..,.•,,t,.*.•-.,.-,•-• ,.,•i,v, sa , . , ,
I
z ta....„, v .....,
t..... int P.m"or. z•..,X
.4 IIL3'.4 4 ..... ' Ilr,1 •L.,.•••• ' ei •i•
it) ., • . . I"' . • . •••.' •V'..11..‘Y....'.2'3'.'5111..;‘`'i.'.4. l'i .'71.7i'l;..' .i'6°.i. 0 II '
..."-.•.. • f.f.1,:.. 1•)••• ft.!•y•-"V...0. .‘ IA' 4 \ 0' 01 6 14 , ,..
'''',..44...:,;1...:..;:‘, 71i' .' •'CV1'.../1"1•;.7.,...Li)',..i a..:i...„, 4.„ 4,>,70.,., - . . . .
% A.7111'..,,,•'‘ ...4slt:INI.' "•'''''c''''•5 A 5.,".7% „1,',.,. • a.1"
1 ''", , H . to.- ... _ . L ; , FL 4:S•i• •:";'.1,":1-,j,"7.<7'.4).•:1:i•• ••1 ,....N V.•A •• •-,1"1"1,1. .1'-'. , . . , ..
"`-"t`*".%...11'.•,••':'?:•;A-';''•'',12:)..'-'.-!'''33'1't•.1"*."..: 14,.;.'".).C1._, '',. -„
or:- ma .a= Elm•RD 111 ' ' 40-.1411' 451E, • 3`,:l.j.;.::Y:i'•• .r...',-1.3)1,-. •-t,-;>-•,••,').'',t4 .'..• •••r',7-,""xl;',;••:1•"?.'' •• . ' 1 -- '
k •.•: ... 1--- • nomilri mime , ,••••• •
4.••. • 11.- ,.. . ,, •"!.,..1,7:1s;1;'•i'.'•.N.7••••-•;,,,,.,••1.71..;.....1•A.17,'A.ei)-vc.?,:, :tt,ti..,;:it..,2,-,•,,I;•1-,-,,:',,,:11,4%.,c,j•s. •
I:1"Z , mc") "I" • , .1 ' a - '' . -,-.v-ka ,..,...9p.,...„,,,,,1,2 ,..,,,•,;;,•,•:;.:'•x..•,...,•;'•%,,..•%:.,,,,..,,,,-i,;.;,-,,i,tE,:"'''.1N,47.:-rh-0,*,./..j..,,,., "•
‘Bni'm 7Litu 1.-• , c:a • \ ' - ,,,-.0„ •..;/'0,',.„,•q:ifk•N';1..,76.J.1".4.:,....:;r.s,,t ., .,1.,i-st,,„•,..;,.,,.t.,..,,,
.IM Lg.. I iivF IF hi i iv..--;.__ • I. ..1'..„,....;13. .4„.•''1...;-,-'•-'N..%-). ,,,/, t.h../......,:?...111.0,,40.. MO.41,N..
V: • ,.., I„,,.•I*in_;,,A`,,t,,,,h-*L":„t1),01 t,"!-..,,,.....-..te*'?"7.11*-1.1. .: .P‘..`.1 V•1'1".-,.
I .2.... .,,... rim me •ji , , Fir, ....„L.. _. x A se ' • -"W•").,z34;.A... -...c.);.y....!i,'f.,)-1.•••.....•.,..„,L,._••••,?.•r.v,,,c.,yo,...,-,q.1%'.1":;',...„ 10...`,.-',
. ',•.. • • filr 711111Er rir ',"i.l'61• t,n, •7•7,...6• •Q".V..?;•:i.„-: /1..1.: ."...„.?!'•/I.,..6„'I,,,,.,`,,..(\':,i.t.,..'',.•..Ni,Y rfr;:..1:41.}
• • 11.15 MIME' 1 kll 1 I•9.;•,1111g - • . as
, ., .--- • 1 ell'''''LIS`.7.-4,,,'''''!•'''i .N.'41.?' ..!3:'','V k-'7P,,--1-'1'''(;i•A''?:'N1;,"07'‘,.-P,1.,..',:',
111-'- Lt.... L., . , . . "'•';'s''t..,,r,-;11.,t'',?'‘,1,',-11 t,.,•:,1,I1-71",•••,1''',1'.1 7"."'-0'"`,1",":""i'l''3'.'i./4,".'''
: '4A • 1 i 49 1 1-•:- - :1" 16' '11'.::,':1:'q.,%*'.'e"..1,'1":"-N12),\I'.4,l'C4!)41)A1'1.'-••71'..,1,4?..,ti,'::c,''.,5 •11."26,
%;V,' '''''At.'1'7'"I', ..t.c.:1" .1.''.17.6*.'1';'4'?Z•iii;t47.2 V.;1!;..:,.;..t1.Pli,%.. ''. %`);„
."1. 1/130't n I,/ 7 '•ON N.„,10tts *
.1= *.i.,':."-ktrt,i.,,.:1;',;?),17,:''''''''.•• -ft ..'.:::/?;*.,...*,'''.:: • ',.:• ire ••
,...,,. ..
,,,wia....-. •. . , rig II ,........ , .. - 4 . •-_,
. 1 1
I ,••••
'.•`.Ci.' 11010:• 5 .- ' •
1.•'".i ' .0** .• * 1 r a rci t• la 4, ..4.. ...
4..4-4,•4•1. - 4 -.--- 5 ••'0 I : . A. qg
' • -./ 0._ 1,1•• 1-• II
„ 4 I. mei; .. el .... •t I „I 4, 1 ......-
P... . ip. 4 • molt, :"I.,.'.• 1 , ..--' ‘.- ",..,e,
i.:',.- '• "iii• '0 . .1 . .
c 4 . ;0 •°
4 S ..._11.... ....1111111 1. 4 la 44 :gillelit:11'.4
. , ......°' ‘....): .......e......„.....„,....
.1.,-4 1 IA.' ''', ,--.. 4 ....r... l'oo'''' -,t 1:2•P'
r'fr 4.te/r‘ •-'`• .
JA.A.--., 51'. 1441:AGto*$I* #t. , at$04.'
".-.•,$:.i, . '
, -r-711 .•4,Pant,:'..*:.. •o,
• • i, . . . 7. *1•. ..... ••$ • .0.0°-- CO r, „Ie.' ...----" ..-'-.',b1110.1.
./-
/
':,-21 't , ... .• /. a a Lr 19 411 el 4„.„ 4 a # If • .......".9 *t' --..r* ..'"... NISIC.-p,..0%'.'
,2 . .__. _ * •0.•" -°,.1° . '5 .......f . --.- Pr/ 9-‘---- •---
I ',/./i 1 P.51%."•'' '-•••.,,....' .t-orrwr -•---2'
er as di. e.a #o q 4 .0 4 „4 • . •
_....... • --,-
'•/' ...• --„_f te. ......, ,,,„, IL •..,4. ••, #......• ' • .,,,,....---i ,,,,,S
.'" ‘D. ..... ' . .
'.n.',0 it' ' ... •
'' S'.... -.......*. C 0 ''''. MOM..•...... . .1.Z./.4.. •. , . .......... ,4% ......le .
%.1.t.1‘..1
,1,, . •
•.4,1; , -..... •.,,... . ......... . Oe', I . . I
.
.........
7:RAN'S. t•IN.-, gottff,--,_
.,
s . ',-- ....,, •....— .
•.,•., • . , • - i • ----.....,. ,__...... _--- , ____......... . ,•
.,...-,,,,:.... ., ••'• • •,......1
__...... —!-- — --",
,••.,,i...,,,.. 0,-;.---. . . ., ..,... -
,.....1 ,,, . 1116..,.01p. . - . ..„,•-
.',.1.-,: • - v • • - • - . .•••••
-;.•,..„.; -.0P, . „..---. ( INN' I ' ,....------ 1
. . •
' - IIIIIIIII
,—.------------'"-:.----'''' . .
' --.-- I .....r''
mos ._-- ---- - i .t •
.......,-.-• et
.._....„-... I
t,,,A.,•4,13-'' • . i• 1 ----- 1
:••'..4..,.,•■•••Il •—- .0 'i ' • . •
,'I
••J,:';‘,.'-"4;1: . 1 • •,, • 1 , , ••1'
I \
:,.,, 4•46,,.. ; . '.0 . . •• I
.0.. % .. •
• ''
. ... ... ; • ' •
NM . „
:•••:$ ...‘5.5. , .-- -
1 eft
4‘• • I 1 . " . . ,
1 ort.;..........----......
!'1:4 1 ' • •N%%. \, 4" 4 4 '
',..A.•/: 1111111Mil -• , '• %... • • . . . ...' . . s
•,„...i,,.. ,
-_______--.: titIVITIr dinVirAirtp •
1.:•..;e4+,---NM -i • . r...,,,,,,
ss
•
.z:.,,',. . !•sum Ices•.•t , , N . • . 5 " t;:i -ft, bag% 4 .4
\ % 4
•-. '• a•ill . neridi,,,;/>1."4
..t• !',,,::.
____, . ,.. . .. • -64, • -
'••.1;':1111011:111%. co ' . •
'• • • '.
, . iliiii 004— FMMOr e>41,44.
-',',:;41P114111121Fgrs • • : . • , . , •
, , •
7.0', 4 7 .• q, rifilikao . SO 0 . r.14
1.T"• arm - , , \ s
• s , ,
•• • .1.1- ' .14, , r f .44V lg..
.,• ii
. .
I . ,
":0:.,! ';, . , • • . •, . . .
. " • ' ' .
•
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — RENTON H I LL'AREA .
•;•.:,,f.,,. ; .,..'.;.:''• -: . ,', ' I
. •. • . . .
• . ,
.•41.1':':.;:.J('',',..:::.:.:2,- ":,1•Y'::JE:,: (PSRIP,t4ON ' THE RENTON HILL AREA, ISJHAT ' AREA , 1 . '. • ' • : ' •
GENERALLY ', BOUND BY -,FAI-405, ON THE WEST,. CEDAR RIVER i' , , • ,. •
04--,THE NORTH,! 'THE 'HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED' AREA ON
•-.1
.',....,,10,,. .?.‘,1,..,..",',.-;,,,.,:.•.,..- ?,.. .,1,. . .:;'. ,. .. , , - , , •
•1•,••'fv- r_'-','-',A,1:::_•:...-.,':71;...,,,'.,:',. THE,EAST"'. AND THE',THE POWERL INE,:•RIGHTOF-WAY.....DN:.THE ' SOUTH'i ). : , ..,, '. . !, .. • ..,.... .,..
,faliVy,'„,:iy,,,,,,'-:;',;.,Li.'„:-,..;'-','•,;;',:.''L'.„-; ';''..,..-:,,,,,-:: '-:, , • ', • ' ".r.-: ,.. ..• . . .
1
:•:,,,,,,'i,.;$,-,..-,I,.,,.:.p,-4':l.-.,;.,..,";,:..;,2-,•-•,-;45-4?,,;,,;V:,.i,:'),-., L".•,.;.•.E-.-'-:'-•'G N-'-‘...,D...''I,-' ,-: '-.-.'. ,• :" .. • ' ''. .• •, "'., •• '. •.,.
',.•, .."''"i:".,•..•
'.•.. .,,...
.' '••.•, ' ' ''1 —• 7 ' • -• ';' '' '' '- . '•...' - .: .'.
',"'•'','•••.'-',". 'L. ,... ..', ' ' •• -,. . ' : . 1 •-• • ,'. -- .. ' . MEDUM DENS I TYC...'•• ' .'-'1...•. . ','...:•• .' . .:
L'''.";:f','4.'''''..V''',';':''''''•'','..,','-;.',.:,',,-',.'.--k'..c•'',•':- '....,.'i.',.,G•REEN.BELT.,•' ,,,.. 7 ..: : ., . ,' RECREATIONAL.' ''•!, . MULTI -FAMILY
1: '": •' :`. : !" '' •:'.1.:,
"1";,',,pf:",,,l',4: :,1;•.,',:n.1i.',17.,..'''J't1,:',;'''''''''':1''''''':;"''',':'•":.:.1 1:..,.Z, ':" ' :::•"':-,••'""'":: ' i'. :' "'' ''
rr:::i1.1":1;,,,,,,;,••Sf';,ft:::",71.1"',1';"„'",,,,,",:4(1'5'1','-''',.1'•n1'',,:::'":• .1•;,ED 1, ;',•,"':••''' "j, ' ::',. ' • :• ' • 1:::i "'''• ..:•: ,.., , •::,''.: :•':-.r.:•,1"•1'.:'•,:,
. ."E::3 - , . ,•. ,. .., •, :.
. . ,
,,.,....,,..., .....„ ,.,,•,, ,
h,..,,.,..-,..,,,,--.,-.. --,,,..„,,-„,-„,„•;•. ..,.,.,.. i-,•••, ,.,,, :, • • .:, : • ••,, ,,; -- -.'•:1•• • •••''••• • •' ' • ••• '•' ••••' ' ' • :i •• •• :••'•'I• •4' ••4' '
.'klAte;V:•'`,'",24•L'?•4••i•ee4''..r,:•2••••.14i,:4!••,•'•••:V4::.•;••••'•'"'•'•• ':'•'••••'4.'••••:•4';'''•t'•,'4'• '•-••14•••e4 ••'•••/4•.4''•• ,••, •''• •••••• • • • • „• .4 4 4 e 4 4
M•:'••:'•:!:!•;'•407•44'4•4?:'i'*•''•••;•:,14:;':‘4';':•1;?••:4.::':'••:••:4 i•• '':'!'''•••••''''•::•:;1•:•.'4I•A:i•'•:•4• •:':•'•' '''''•••••'.:•• "••• :'.•r•'•••: 4• • • ' '• •: • ,: • 4•, • •• ; . •• • •• • • • ••' • : 4 • : 4.. , •
• • •
•.4••• •
• ' • YI-11Bj I..A' iii,i;
RENTON HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Concerns for our neighborhood
i 7
v=_
1 . Traffic Volume - The numbers of vehicles using Renton Hill
streets cause severe congestion at times. An increase in
traffic volume would be impossible to handle. The following
traffic counts are from city records.
1972 - The pipeline road was open during the Boeing slump.
Count taken on S. 3rd east of Mill for 24 hours.
Resultse Eastbound - 1279, Westbound - 1466.
1973 - The pipeline road was closed. Same location for
24 hours.
Resultss Eastbound - 716, Westbound - 831 .
When the pipeline road was open, traffic volume dramatically
increased and residents requested closure of the road due
to the many other problems caused by the increase in traffic.
2. Parking - On street parking is mandatory for most residents.
Those who have garages have realized that they were not
built for modern day cars.
3. Street Width - The streets are not adequate for safe passage
of two cars going opposite directions unless one pulls• over
to the side to allow the other to pass. According to city
ordinances, residential streets must be at least 50.. feet wide
and neighborhood collector streets at least 60 feet wide.
Cedar Avenue (where the proposed development would be) has
a 40 foot right of way but the actual street width is only
26* feet. Cedar Avenue was improved with an L.I .D. last
year and we are now paying for a new, substandard street
because there is simply not enough room to widen the street.
4. Access - Although we have only one access, past experience ;•_
has shown that another access creates more problems for us
than it solves. It makes our community a thoroughfare for
residents in other areas and causes extreme congestion.
We prefer to live with just one access.
Page 2
Renton Hill concerns •
5. Safety - Pedestrian safety is adequate if there is a single
access point. Fire safety is assured by a mutual aid agreement
with Fire District #40 who will come through the gate at the
top of the Hill if the city is unable to respond.
6. Alleys - Alleys are inadequate to develop for major use due
to width, grade and no right of way through many back yards.
7. Crime Rate - At the present time we enjoy the lowest crime
rate in the city of Renton. There is rarely a serious
disturbance on the Hill. From the records of the Renton
Police Department, the following are .the last statistics
kept on crime rate by neighborhood.
1976 Number of calls
January 9
February 10
March 14
April 12
May 6
June 11
July 18
TOTAL - 7 months 80 calls
Most of these complaints were nuisance calls i.e. kids throwing
rocks, cars parked over 24 hours,. etc. In comparison with
other areas for the month of July, the Highlands had 36 calls
and the downtown area had 94 calls. Renton Hill had 14 less
calls in 7 months than the adjacent downtown area had in one
month. Since the Hill is directly adjacent to the downtown
business district, it is unusual to have such a low crime rate.
8. Children's Safety - Since there is no other access, our children
enjoy the safety of knowing most of the people who come on
the Hill. Unfamiliar cars are easily spotted and there are
few strangers. 0 .
9. School Bussing. —There is no elementary school within walking
distance of Renton Hill so the children catch the bus from
the park at the top of the Hill. . The Renton School District
will not allow its buses to run on the Hill because it is
Page 3
Renton Hill concerns
too dangerous because of the steep grade. It is unsafe for
children to wait for the bus at the bottom of the Hill due
to the railroad track and the traffic. A surge in population
would compound the bussing problem.
10. Property Value - The Hill has become a desirable place to
live due to the character of the neighborhood, our single
family status and our view property. There are few vacant
houses which adds to the safety and appearance of the neighborhood.
11 . Quality of the Neighborhood - We feel nothing will be gained
by changing the quality of the neighborhood by the addition
of multi-family housing. We have a very unique neighborhood.
It is old, well established and has historical value. In
fact, a picture of one home is shown in the book Renton -
From Coal 'To Jete. There are many second and third generation
families on the Hill today which is unusual in our highly
mobile society. There is pride of ownership which shows up
in the vast remodeling activity on the Hill. People choose
to keep an older home and restore or remodel it because they
like living on Renton Hill and they are unable to duplicate
the atmosphere in another neighborhood. We are one of the
oldest residential communities in the city and we are proud'
that our homes have stood the test of time. There is value
in repairing old homes rather than tearing them down to build
new ones. Unlike many older neighborhoods, ours is being
revitalized and is not deteriorating.
12. Quiet - We have a quiet and peaceful neighborhood which is
no small accomplishment considering our proximity to the
downtown area, Interstate 405 and the railroad tracks.
13. Community Facilities - Philip Arnold Park is adequate to
provide for our needs and is used by many residents in the
city. But the addition of apartment complexes would seriously
over-crowd the park.
m Page 4 :'
Renton Hill concerns
14. Public Works - We have concern that our sewer and drainage
systems could not withstand the strain of providing for the
needs of a large increase in population.
The points we have listed are only guidelines to help you
understand how we feel about Renton Hill and the many concerns
we have weighed to formulate our position. We hope this will
be of help to you in making your decision about the future of
Renton Hill.
•.
a!`n 41
J
OPENING STATEMENT beforeARenton City Council, November 21 , 1977
My name is Kathy Keolkers my address is 532 Cedar Avenue South.
I am responsible for the petition asking for a rezone of Cedar
Avenue South that was submitted to you in June 1977. A .second
petition was circulated on the remainder of Renton Hill in support
of the original petition. It also opposes zoning., planning or
building of multiple family dwellings or industrial concerns on
Renton Hill or in any adjacent area that might require access
through our neighborhood. The two petitions have over 250 sig-
natures to date and they represent a majority of Renton Hill
property owners. Many of these people have lived on Renton Hill
for more than 50 years.
Since these petitions were circulated, we have formed a.
community group called the Renton Hill Community Association.
We support and encourage growth that is in the best interests
of the residents of the Hill. We are before you this evening
in support of the Planning Commission' s recommendations for
changes in the comprehensive land use plan for our area. You
are our elected representatives and we ask you for your help in
solving the problems of Renton Hill.
This evening we will affirm our position as opposing
apartment development on Renton Hill. We will share the specific
concerns which prompted us to take action in order to give you
as much information as possible to make a decision on the.
recommendations that are before you. Simply the fact that we
have united our families, friends and neighbors in the effort
to save Renton Hill is a credit to the City of Renton. . We value
40r-
Page 2 "
S Opening Statement, 11/21/77 .
all the good qualities of life in this city and we feel these
qualities are represented in our neighborhood. This effort has
not been made by one person but by the many members of the
community as a whole. Our position is to encourage orderly,
appropriate growth for Renton Hill that is practical, responsible
and healthy.
The people who will share our concerns tonight are members
of the Renton Hill Community Association and were chosen by their
neighbors to represent them and speak for their interests. Each
person will give a short presentation of specific concerns. In
this way, we will share a maximum amount of information in a
minimum of time .
We have spent several weeks in meetings with members of the
Planning Commission to study Renton Hill in depth. I am very
impressed with their dedication and professionalism and I am
amazed with the amount of time and study that has gone into their
final recommendation. We support their recommendations in total
and we are pleased to know that such a conscientious advisory
group is involved in the city planning process.
we will show you tonight that the addition of multi-family.
housing on Renton Hill would have a severe detrimental impact
on an existing long-established community. It would destroy
the unique character of our neighborhood. At the present time,
we have reached and, in some cases, exceeded the amount of
traffic volume these old streets can handle. With the addition
of apartment complexes the traffic volume, access, street width
Page 3
, - Opening Statement, 1 i i/77
and parking would be intolerable. This is our most pressing
concern. We are also concerned with maintaining our low crime
rate, insuring the safety of our children, appreciating the
historical value of the Hill and encouraging the pride of
ownership which is so important in older neighborhoods.
Renton Hill has the potential to become the showplace of the city.
By revitalizing and improving an older single family community
that exemplifies the best qualities of life in the City of
Renton, we all benefit from responsible growth and we add to the
value of Renton as a desirable and pleasant place to live.
We are concerned, we are proud of our neighborhood and we
care. If we didn' t care, no petitions would have been circulated,
no signatures willingly given, no community association formed
and no one would be here this evening. We value our homes and
the quality of life on Renton Hill and we feel these qualities
are priceless. Without love, family and a sense of belonging
for each individual, our society will not survive. When we '
stop to realize that each person' s life touches another, we
must try to insure that in. our relationships with other people
we are warm, compassionate and caring. This is the feeling of
being a member of the family of Renton Hill and this is what
we are trying to save.
November 21 , 1977
Tot The Honorable Charles Delaurenti, Mayor and
Members of the Renton City Council
Fromt The Renton Hill Community Association
Dear Mayor and City Council Members;
I have prepared this information for your use this
evening to serve as a guideline for our presentation to _
you. Included is a copy of my opening statement and,a ..
listing of the concerns of the residents of Renton Hill.
This information is not meant to provide conclusions but only
to share with you the many factors we have defined and taken
into consideration in deciding what our position should be.
We concur completely in the Planning Commission' s
recommendation and ask that you accept it in its entirety.
They have spent many hours of study and debate on the problems
of Renton Hill and have arrived at a solution we can live
with.
We are willing to provide any other information you
might require to help in your decision-making process. My
phone number is given below for your convenience.
Sincerely,
7 7 / '
Kathy Keolker, President.
Renton Hill Community Association
532 Cedar Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
255-0936
•
4 Of R ,'V
..- o THE CITY OF RENTON
`J %6 : ,- Z MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
A °; CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
pA <0 235-2550
0•94,, SEPj4��
November 18 , 1977
Ms . Gail L . Paris
Legal Assistant .
Shidler , McBroom , Gates & Baldwin
1000 Norton Building
Seattle , Washington 98104
RE : COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE
REPORT - OCTOBER 12 , 1977
Dear Ms . Paris :
In response to the questions in regard to the above
noted report , Planning Commission recommendations apply
to the area as described in the public hearing notice •
on the back of page one . Mill Avenue South would be
included in the. referenced area . It should be noted ,
however, that the Planning Commission ' s recommendation
is relative to the City of Renton ' s Comprehensive Plan .
The matter of zoning was not the subject before the
Planning Commission , and the Planning Commission made
no recommendations on the question of zoning .
•
If you have any further questions , please contact me .
Very ; rule Yours ,
4 ---- 51:---‘—
//'
rdon Y - ricksen
annin , irector
/ GYE :wr
' ER •9kty,
•
' OF R4 A.
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
V .$ © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
0
0 b CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593
AV
44rf0 SEPIV
•
November 15, 1977 •
TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney
FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
•
SUBJECT: Renton Hill Rezoning .
After reading the attached City Council minutes of the OctOber. 17,. 1977. meeting, it
remains unclear if the issue of any rezoning per City Council request should, by
ordinance,' be heard by the Examiner or Planning Commission. M . Shellan's comment
in the minutes indicated that the answer pivots on whether any rezone. is areawide •
or not.
He seemed to have advised the City Council that areawide rezones should be heard by .
the Planning Commission. By implication, rezones for specific. pieces of property
pursuant to specific applications should be heard by the Examiner. The former • .
rezoning is responsive to changing the Comprehensive Plan and a decision to bring
existing zoning into conformance thereto. In contrast, the latter rezoning is
responsive to' an application from an indiv,idual(s) 'property owners) for changing
the existing•. zoning to conform to. the Comprehensive Plan.
This issue surrounds the current public hearings being conducted by the Planning
Commission regarding the 'Comprehensive Plan for Renton Hill. The issue is also. not
critical at . this time; however, its consideration is of import when the City Council •
deliberates upon possible actions to take as a result of any Comprehensive Plan
changes .it .may adopt. • •
My request is .for confirmation. either way on the. issue. If. the City Council and
Planning Commission are laboring under a misunderstanding of Mr. Shellan's legal
advice, this should be raised to the Council when it. receives the Planning Commission's
recommendation. regardin_g the Comprehensive Plan. Otherwise, the understanding' should
be formalized for my records at least prior to the Examiner receiving any request
. for hearing any areawide rezoning.
.
,i11
r.
41
•
L. Rick Beeler V ' 'RECEIVED 0'
1.
L R>3:snp Nov .14 is77
cc: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti \� �.,_-�,.....�
Council President George J. Perry !9 �2
..,o' rdon I. F:rtcksen, Planning Director 2��NG DE'
PP • No
Oi •
SHIDLER. MCBROOM. GATES & BALDWIN
ROGER L.SHIDLER LAW OFFICES
GEORGE W. McBROOM 1000 NORTON BUILDING (206) 223-4666
• WILLIAM H. GATES SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104
WILLIAM F. BALDWIN
JAMES R. IRWIN
JAMES C. MIDDLEBROOKS November 9, 1977
RICHARD B. DODD
FREDERICK ROSS BOUNDY
JAMES L. FLETCHER
CRAIG V. WENTZ
DAVID T. MADONALD
PATRICIA J. PARKS
DALE K. ROUNDY
•
GARY D. HUFF ,
WILLIAM A.BUTLER
Renton Planning Commission
Planning Department
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055 . .
Re: Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
of October 12, 1977
Dear Members of the Planning Commission:
On page seven Of the above-referenced report under point
No. 1 relating to land use recommendations , the Commission
' recommends that:
"1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations
of the Hill area, the Committee recommends that the
Hill area north of the Puget Sound Power and Light
Company transmission right-of-way be designated as
single family residential. "
Is Mill Avenue South included in the area referred to above
as the area the Planning Commission is recommending be zoned
single 'family residential? I would appreciate a response to this
question before Tuesday, October 18 , , 1977 .
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Very truly v ,
G L. .Paris
GLP:pm L al Assistant
/1S -7.14& •
.)/ Carib
•
NOV 10 1971
\\G nFPAR
:J 1 • 11,
. � 0 V" RFC,
�i ° THE CITY OF RENTON
Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON WASH 98055
• nop ' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLAN N T
,o 4o' ING DEPARTMENT
�9 kQ` 235 2550
4'ED SE PI C7' •
MEMORANDUM
October 25 , 1977
• TO: Planning Commissioners
FROM: Gordon Y, Erickson , Planning Director
RE : CITY COUNCIL, REFERRAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN , RENTON HILL AREA
Attached for your information are a memo and . Council
minutes of June 6 ,. 1977; and October, 17 , 1977, to
clarify the intent of the Council referral .
In view of this , the Planning Commission public hear-
ing scheduled for November 9 will be on ' the Comprehen-
sive Plan only, as it relates to the expanded area of
the. Hil.l (powerline right-of-way to Puget Drive to
. Edmonds Avenue S. E. /116th Avenue S. E. extended) .
GYE :wr
Attachments
cc : Mayor
Council President
f /r- ,
OC Ft
• II .?' THE CITY OF RENTON
4
1, 1 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
0 ® CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ► MAYOR ® DELORES A. MEAD
1 tcf
�Q. CITY CLERK
0447. SEPSt-�0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Renton Planning Commission
FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk.
RE: Comprehensive Land Use Planning - Renton Hill
• The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting Of October 17,
1977, has directed that the Planning Commission be advised of
Council action as follows: MOVED' BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH,
PLANNING COMMISSION BE NOTIFIED THAT INTENT OF MOTION ON 6/6/77
WAS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THIS TIME TO CONSIDER ONLY
THE COMPREHENSIVE .PLAN. CARRIED. ,City Attorney Shellan noted
per ordinance,. that the jurisdiction for rezoning is with the
Land• Use Hearing Examiner and the primary function with the •
Planning Commission is change in Comprehensive Plan and also
recommendations on zoning changes areawide.
•
1 'OCT 25 1977
� ,1
l`
`G
-,
Renton City Council
10/17/77 Page 4
Correspondence and Current Business - Continued
Garbage Letter from Deputy Finance Director Bennett recommended referral to
Continued the Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION.' Councilman Stredicke
inquired re change in King County scale system, being advised by
Bennett that scales go into effect about 11/1/77 with probable .
change in rates at that time. Public Works Director Gonnason antici-
pated letter next Monday indicating rate increase. Councilman Perry
noted being advised in committee meeting of $50,000 surplus in the
garbage fund and asked Administration for clarification by next week.
Mayor Delaurenti asked Deputy Finance Director to handle request.
MOTION CARRIED.
Advance Refunding Letter from Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation requested meet-
Water & Sewer ing to discuss advance refunding of 9/1/54, 5/1/65 and 12/15/65
Revenue Bonds water and sewer revenue bonds, having previously met with Finance
Director and Deputy. The letter explained purpose that new refund-
ing bonds issued on a parity .of lien with the 1976 refunding bonds
and eliminate the 1.5 coverage requirement; new coverage require-
ment would be 1.3 on all the water and sewer debt or annual 'reduction
in debt service Of approximately _$65,000. The letter noted second
benefit of refunding program with reduction of in debt service of
approximately $43,700. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER
MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION.
•
Councilman Stredicke noted reduction in funds of $100,000 for
application to Senior Citizen Center, being advised by Deputy Finance
Director Bennett that savings on water and sewer bond issues are
Utility: Fund and not General Fund savings; Stredicke inquiring re
' transfer/appropriation. MOTION CARRIED. .
OLD BUSINESS Council President read 6/6/77 Council minutes regarding petition
from Renton Hill' citizens to review zoning in area .and action taken
Comprehensive, with substitute motion by Shinpoch that Council refer request for
• Plan - • single family zoning to the Planning Commission, and Hearing Examiner,
Renton Hill which, motion carried. Perry reported discussion re intent of divi-
sion of, responsibilities and tasks and PERRY MOVED, SECOND.SHINPOCH,
. PLANNING COMMISSION BE NOTIFIED THAT INTENT OF MOTION ON 6/6/77 .
• WAS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THIS TIME TO CONSIDER ONLY THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED. City Attorney Shellan noted per
ordinance, that the jurisdiction for rezoning is with the Land Use
Hearing Examiner and the primary function with Planning Commission
is change in Comprehensive Plan and also recommendations on zoning
changes areawide. (See earlier setting of public hearing)
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted com
Development mittee report recommending Council support the request of the King.
Committee Report County Council to introduce proposed King County Motion 77-237 to the
Joint Sphere of State Legislature, being,enabling legislation to allow cities and'
•
Influence counties
COUNCIL CONCUR SINeRECOMMENDATION. CARRIEDre of- influence. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
Off-Site The committee report recommended changes to the ordinance following
Improvements review of procedures for granting deferrals, exceptions, variances
and waivers by City Board.and Land Use Hearing Examiner, as follows:
(a) 'Ordinance creating the Bd. of Public Works Code-6-2-606 member-
. ship - restructure membership to include Director of Public Works,
Director of Parks and Recreation, Director of Planning, Fire Chief
and Traffic Engineer (deleting Airport Director and Finance Director.
(b) .Duties 6-2-602E, revise changing work "variances" to deferments"
adding after thereto "deferments shall, not exceed 24 months. (c).
Add new section allowing granting of deferred off site improvements
by Board of Public Works, adding statement that such deferments
may be granted for reasonable cost not to exceed a period of two
. years. The report noted committee will continue to review and' study
Council policy regarding this subject. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND
PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR .IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Councilman Perry noted policy change that deferments shall not exceed
24 months and deferment shall not be granted unnecessarily; previous
-- policy left open-ended deferments, such as at time of• LID in area.
MOVED BY STREDICKE; SECOND PERRY, REFER ORDINANCE CHANGES TO THE WAYS
AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
p.enton City Council c.? % yv : 5.
6/6/77 Page 3 •
Consent Agenda - Continued
Energy Directo . Other members: Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner,
Conservation and Clark Petersen, Library Director. Committee will coordinate
Committee the City's energy conservation measures. Information.
1ppointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs. Joan A. Walker, 1433
'limning Monterey Ave. NE, to three-year term on the Planning, Commission
:onmmission effective 7/1/77 through 6/30/80, having served on the Commission
since 1975 and presently Vice Chairman. Refer to the Wgys and Means
Committee.
•
\ppointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointted Peter Banks additional
Judge Pro tem ' Municipal Court Judge Pro tem., The letter explained Mr. Banks is
with law firm of Hardwick and Conrad, Evergreen Building; appointment
effective through 12/31/77. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
:onsent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AS
Ipproval. PRESENTED. CARRIED.
:ORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
,enior Citizen Letter from Leland Pumel, Chairman, Senior Citizens Planning Committee
:enter informed Council. of motion passed unanimously at their 5/16/77 meeting
recommending that the Mayor and City Council pass a $600,000 limited
• general obligation bond to complete the senior center. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMUNITY
SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
•
iistrict Court Letter from Mayor Delaurenti requested Committee of the Whole'agenda
ease of 6/9/77 include presentation by Del Bennett on lease negotiations
with the County for District Court space; lease agreement must be
executed by 6/30/77. Presentation to include proposed allocation
of space for Municipal Court. Moved by Perry, Second Clymer, Council
refer communication to the Public Services Committee for review and
recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN REQUEST OF MAYOR'S OFFICE AND REFER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE
WHOLE. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: THORPE, SHINPOCH, BRUCE; 3-NO: PERRY,
STREDICKE, CLYMER. MAYOR DELAURENTI VOTED AYE AND BROKE TIE VOTE,
MOTION CARRIED
atecomer's Letter from William L. McLaughlin, Jr., 10630 SE 176th, Renton,
greement requested a latecomer's agreement for a water line he is installing
ater line in the Kennydale area, noting the plan filed with Water Department, No.
W-463. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST
TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE. . CARRIED.
enton Hill A petition hearing 63 signatures of residents of Renton Hill, mainly
edar Ave S. Cedar Ave. S. requested rezone of Cedar Ave. S. in its entirety for
equests single family dwellings, except those multi-family units currently
ingle Family in existence, based on reasons: (1) Traffic pattern accessibility,
oning street width and parking not adequate; (2) Do hot wish to forfeit
views by allowing apartments to locate in neighborhood; all residents
taking pride in homes and having gone to considerable expense in both
time and money to improve older homes. The letter noted the neighbor •
-
hood is a quiet place to live and intent to keep it that way. Moved
by Perry, Second Stredicke, Council. refer communication to the Planning
Commission for review and recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY
SHINPOCH, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING
ON RENTON HILL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HEARING EXAMINER. :CARRIED.
dvance Refunding Letter from' Mayor Delaurenti attached letter from City's investment
ater & Sewer consultants, Seattle-Northwest Securities Corp. signed by Richard T.
onds Kennedy, Vice President, concerning recommendations for advance refund-
ing of $2,950,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, 1976. The
Mayor's 'letter concurred with Mr. Kennedy's recommendations and noted •
Kennedy would meet with the Ways and Means Committee 6/6/77 at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. 'Kennedy's letter attached schedule of existing debt service and
Proposed refundinn issue and savings. noting meeting with Public Works
Gonnason and Deputy Finance Director Bennett and the Finance Director,
Gwen Marshall. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH', COUNCIL CONCUR
IN RECOMMENDATION AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Mr. Kennedy; City's investment consultant, was introduced.
•
4111
5, II 036-0-fri
p y.` a NOTE ON YOUR CALENDAR. •
.f. '. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE •
1 '
t r
` CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY
j'` RENTON CITY COUNCIL ' .
k';w, . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that. the Renton City Council has fixed the gist
'' : day of,' 149y ,br , 1977 , at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers" of,
,„7, ' the",Renton Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, as the time and place
,I , • , :for a,,publ'ic hearing .to, consider the following:
f{ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, RENTON HILL PLANNING AREA '(THAT AREA GENERALLY 1 ,
.; BOUND, BY FAI-405 .ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE
:,, AND UNDEVELOPED. AREA ON THE EAST,. AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON
, a THE SOUTH)
., SEE ATTACHED MAP .
y,�ia
1
Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval , ,
disapproval or opinions on same.
CITY OF RENTON
, Q
De ores ad,
City Clerk
DATE OF PUBLICATION
October 21 , 1977 of Rk'4,�
. tiCENEb
V 'L
OCT 18 1977. '
1 4/15----4,.
92�f �� ,
-.�.-cJ = `' -�e.c-.-`t g y - ' •
•
''` _�i� _-�— - - ' ,/-' - ±1 f •
(T".') • ..1 T---_. D'-�....---- - - - . -- "."-`s• -r, "'�
T11 a; �
III dam. : /.
f'\
•
• s.
•
. ; .-4,. ..._11,„.e,-.. : r. - -i. . a- i. ..]
•
iT n -a I A . • 4; .-1,..- . 4,.. - . ‘,..4. ..,
/�
Ai
, .
/ s // /. ......
. .},.. ...a..--!.
1R- `_.......... . ` `� ( . a •av . ,' o
C� \ - `a j i . • :. . , :. . .▪ , , . .,
\ -r 7
'�':h
▪ T
. � .rfnt. . . !- --- -- • - , _ . e' itzi,. - •• :_ • - •• . -t/-
_..:fit .•. - IPt •-..- •r.
-2 -
.:.•."wrm•• .••••••a.u1,14-. r-barb!- .Y . >A ' L ._ r _ r 4
•
•
•
•
.....7•••••••••.r.- :'.+:.:c ••M.at-t:!'++sue o _-Tt____--_x.,t -_.T' .� _�.
•.N.' .••••••++ till+t•\• .rwu•• -�t::V,,L••.aa..•:- _ ••i • .'••v _.,-•_ r, - - . -----
sb „.a:„.. '.•ii la.T•nv v yi...e •r.Tr
ra - . -. _ l .1•- Q- , .-.: l-.-._ ._. :d- •, • 1 \ `
_: ::::c. :.•::7a::,..• A...4.6'sue---.44 S ` .. •• - -. ... - `1, r
I
•
u: MyUIR. Lan•.:a.a444l*L. .3l1a2I'tU4 ,,.. .• ...;a•:+.•. .•a=.•rti, :: - _ ..i••.
,i., ,.TJ•iJ -4474.1.4JdJa.• -:..,.il // ///r...16 ' _;.4 * - - - - -
■f..s1•l)VliaL: 391LgU•W11. .-ee_'" • f f t t °�•
Sine�•• _ Y,,,. _ ____
•
•
▪ * 71 5 * r / . b- . .. -. ' r= ••• .._ • ._ :: .���- .-•..• _ -A*� ` . f. 7 I g3 _
•
/ 3� •ii yi•J• . .q,�.1,!••�� - �h . ,•, —_�.Q a �_4-. n pv•:1_:--: ----.s ..._ •#; -- - '( /
•
--91.t..t� ..'• S.1S. ......a ._ •ry:••_!._ !is�11_'Ll9'•~••. - - c? -�/
•_a.' f• .${•1!`NW 7. .." .j_ -try Qp�?fft•• I •,.4 i °L'•Pr ..�• •...•.f_
- \7♦ 1 �:ti+Y••Ca • .---
•_' .
• O • �.- _
. �+
•
`® .�• �" .•- ?» 1Jqv� • . ��" �_ %itar;• S �nl 113.NblD � �
e • � ' .i'3 • A . _:s••-• . - . -r-f f� ....am - ..
I -.a,z- •_1 a1,>�y.' F4 - t1ss... : ..?- - 3 .r_.... _ :�,.:- •.��J.; _ •+ _ .
- _-x-- -- _- • 7J.•:silt-• •- ` -ry __1_1Mf••: _• - ‘, l+. 42164iAWALF
f / ,• •r . ,�• wry• '.e • ".4• 47.'7-'_; _ ,•-. , 1... J_ _ _ _ f
• F -vy ` - • �_A.1 —i
i - . i^� _ .t i n •
_'. 3 '•a:.--per• .J!ia•._•• rw_ ..••. row.'aim.. - f t'hr-.l:w-a
. .
. .
- , •-,4.... , ..
. ,
. . .
• i . .
„ .
• -
• ., . •
•. .;.',,:',•,.•."ic•-•,i,: „.1.7-7giMii,74,"7--.2,.;,--0,,7.1,,,,,',71..t5J''''..i. ki,i;c:•.".zwq-gi ,';,.:•:,:-,17,—.7.777.7.7..',..,-i.;',',/:,,,,,,i,,,,,,,iyo.,,VM-;;.7;7,,,Tii.H, p,c7.7"
6 i':`,-,'',...pinee'A4:"..1:','!•-i7,7„7 ,,,sNr.figNaep,(46*.:i-qvg,,, ,,,,...,,,,:
.146.. :to ,,,,,4._e
... c,,•.,,.p. ,-,.C.,,,v,,..,,,I,vt,,, .; --y --. . ••..,;,0,...1,441r,••i.,,,,,,zg•-,•v•.,,..k• .'-;-,::„...i-• --•-',,,,f,..,....:::.4.,!:,,,,'E:-,,--- ;,,:i't..„'!..e,,..;;;,:, '...:.:Ii,•:,..,,,,-,'-`,:t.-,•,..,• :,,,,,•.,....,••';' -..''-,--, ••',:::::•.•,;',,,,-;:.:.:••• '''.--:,:.-,..;.,•-: ..4.-..i,;;,,,'',',i;:r4iikk.',4'..•' •'''-•-'.
•'...;::-;.-• .3.'dmi':.
.„,,,,,,.,,
,,,,,,,,,,,, ...„,:,,,,,,,„„.,„‘„ .",..„L„, ,,,,,,„....,,,,,,,,,,„: . .i,„,,,,,,,,,. :,,,, „e...,,„ 4„, 4s,_ , ,.„4„,A,..c1.4..t.A.,,,,....,,,,o,..„,,,,,,,,,o,,..•:•,,,.:.„„,...,,,,,... ...,
p
v.•!,-,,..„1,,,,y‘cr-., 7,-, ,,,,,,,:5 7,-,g-,:',,,,.."t..ip.,•.:,,,,FOF,4..'vr,4',A-0;...,r v.,- ...,, ,c,...' -;.-• ;g41.41,1c4,7 ,..44.,,..,-,-,..v.,-,Atfirlfs.y' qi,o.,.:,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, .: ,,,,
"'''.?‘..01:;Igk:.77-$';';''',?.A.14N'!?.',.;::',aPl'Ai,..4.1:iki.eti..Fi•eR'-'-'0:0. :,,,.,,.:'ei.:.•.., :PP.40,..:4,,, ,,I.,.1?,.!iijiia.i''-'!:,'.7,.1.e.,..N•e'il,.1p;.:31:!!-%.',..-• ' .1.:' . • ..•: .., .
:•',3-:'4,,:,,,ii,.:f;!3!13„..gi.;-,...01001,.41it,U,A,P,1400S "TP--'4;:,,,V.N.g.a.1,,,P.I.L,,i,$::'4;44' j,„4;11P7,T.:',.. ' .•
AC. 74144ik';$,I4V,14 L...31.:.,:ft, .il-,t4IRIO'.'s4. 4:10..(Z.V41INAgt!,;0-i,.4:,..,2,„.,..,..,i,1,,t,:.6.::,.,
....:,,ter ,,,:lr, e , 1,,,,, „ use„..w; ,..,„„, .
. 3,.., ..„ •, ,.,,,;;) .,, .„ ., i,. . .,,,, ',WF.'•:, ' 'r4'.i ,,,...,1-.1.1'*,',,q',44
': .tii:. ".';'':; ''''.1' ,.; :Al_ ,,":n;;i!; ','''t.. '2' .:2.,r:::../...1,....;:,,61.,„,. .,...?t'...,i ,, ,..:M,li-i''..1444044,:r2;40).!#4,:„;1: il,'-':
t i ,
4,:v..'li w•-i,„,y,..4,:,,3;,:,:r;.:,;/,1,,;',.,A•4,;,,,I.,..,:,,I...-..,tir...q..ei ,Ai.,,,,„::;„:4t-pcs-,,,y;,,,,,;:4,4,p2_-.;1,,!/,,,,4,1,,::,,.: ,,•,,..,.',..:::0,::1,,.;:,„641,,:,::,..;A•31.,,,,e, ,I,-;,•:•A,,,'.:.;.1,pAt'Y,,,":',;4•W'.:".•rimlie-,1...i-,L',1,,;•,..!,-4,.,:•-•.;,.1•,,--,,,-.,-... ..-4,:lg..;?•,-.-,-,',.;;.:11,..,7.i.-:0-,-.:,i1-74!.›,,,,,'.,:w..,,,q-,?•-,1..' .-
.
0:.;e.,.N:,..;',4-',,4''•,.-1,`,'-z,,7',5,V,.,,.„,.„.,.,/,,,, N,fA,i,,',)I.,;.,,,,•,P.i:,,,.,A,,,,,:j;.'.:"„i74,,,,.1.15.,e "„. ,0An n,,'•'...:!,W "-'''>,' '•':':!.'',,.,•:\'.I"..:!'''•'.1:'i'•',,,.':.i':.!.. •'''_;!';•,.;:.„t./;.„'i..;;).h!,.,;,I‘,.1....;'1i,.fuP V7„,1,„1l.'„:4..:.:.xi5r,2,''7,.,1',:,,.,,.,4.::',,''.,1..4...'''.:,'.,::1,,?;,;..,;.."''.',:,'.,1n3',;.y,,:i3O,').;',a,,'„V;P,?,;k,:•.;..:„'4:'„'.(,'',.'i'.,,.'.':„,,V:,?4t,;1t1'{..1.:,.:,-e'VA':,'...1'f,*f„1,,.1f„4.+'71A,''4v,,.,.„„y'.J'ji3,,.'i;,;W‘,,'',,,n`..:i,,..k„.d.,.•..„'','.,..,,.';.:,',,.:.)..I..,.',,1•...'•?„'
, •.
,-.„.„2,,,.,,,:v:,,f,,,,,',f1/4.:.,..',..,,j,..,-.W",.1.;,1,..'',.',i.11;)....,.,Tei.,.,*V4r•Pr .''''.:''' . .,-,'''''TP.1,,c-'i,',/.C..,a)67,r.).45ii,,, ,,#41,4 f-',:tiV 1W/,..,,q:N.,44:-4,4.:i.,1.e"."4,,,,'''...:',,''''.:•','0,.'"`•.,7.-.:-,-:r.,.,..,;?,,:,•"';''''...;"'',"','''',,,,,,,-6,11,414",,:`',..,-,`;',', . '•.
.:4':',4',V-f1.4P.ViW;:t.1-t,ff •...:- '•: .' -,'•C.-','''...?•,,',..6ic 1141\9:,.';',,P.f4.Ati-i'A' AVO i-'''''.:I''',.'"' ,
$,:PERIPRY.',Ng5';„0?..:4.,;5-,,,V,,i'l0,40,04,S1.0?„§.";%,'A:,:,:'Ili.lig';,. rf
,K"q4A1041-1W'i.',ACA:.rarret viis- ppsiTiOROF:anvg:i•,,,,,,,i,:-.!• . . • .
''....'iititiei,--bothlBt-iielot!',14!p,:,*,07,e- tii: s'r1.4iv,,•,,,t4k,r1.,,ie.47,44.f..-„,.... ..•-•,,,---, • .
,•• .
..,;•,!...,k,,,,,,,,,,„e,;,,, •,:i;,,V.a..Tici ',':';,,..,,IV-•-,''.:,"'""1:.RE.%0.00K,f,•-•1,,•:,.i'iOilr'A40:pii4oWoSS.1g4.`:.i.,*';'', 3 ep..,o:- rTe...P.4.t,a1i.'rgqi);\:n',.,-,':.-",•-C.1,-:.1•0!.;,•',"t5-„f.'f:•.;'A-r•i,e::„', „,j.1,A*‘1P,AkC'4.*;vV44
i) iibittef04iitek*:04StoaCiN40 Al,900*1;5,s0tl *1E0C,1;,W,R;•tIri4t.5P:::;4t.:1'4,V,sb;:',,v,.,,,.',,,I,,•,,:4c','4;':'?,,,tA''i;.,..-
:::';,•1!1. ' -. ,. .:.'•- . • :
Ive,',i:iico';',:'iiiiit''.',iiei;t1iii4iiii.ail'iiiiifiaig td.Es0404.;w*.4':APAtt00.14: 0.);V:pt;',.;,';i9k4.t... .i • - . ..
..:''f"iffi'i'i' fiiii6rif w.iia,.--66fiiliiiiiiiil-,:y.,:, :4z.'etif-dif-Itillii-ZhelIO*11Tirpes l'•cl-,Ax4Z•c•--'0,i'ii -' • • • ,
'.:'•';',•''..::!:tii-ii:1,65i14trOdtit*t*I;;•!,j'Agt0flp-o,Rkeo.-F3i;f)ptr-,TVpOly-irqP,Prt64''tI14P001,e,,,,`,-.4Y. -i/..,-)!. .1•,,,,, . , ' ..
' Liaiiitt•F..004:•4•.',/T rl.','',!,
4‘jlii,Rijr1::::';';';'''''';'::. :':.'''''.'''*U:Vg01 1'4gW190 eri';'''•Gone:,,,Vavell1;
. ,,.., The..„4 ' P ' . ,,%4:,.' i .' aid'' :-'' . ',,. 'i.,4,4 ,1 ' .i'''',...''14' Wit f'I'.',1',-"`i.';'-'41;.4'4,-i:•,':: .
:!,.'gginOWORACC! ffk:1,1;t44:1 '",•hef1F413K!T ,t4r: ,TilkA 1-.•-IYANIA:fi ' • ' ". ,
.•,-.44tisig.gie10,-'iiii*-hioti(D;li011ytti'011,,:,POIR:t*Ittt A POP.1_„Tt,t01'...
t'ftirktiiiii-to.)t:',-4140:014e.;•,,:it-iik jliig.!*4;,,.,,p*o.o,,tct'. 4,g4v4A13Ti. Is;':r,qr,'..'
iiiigfe'Paiiiiikfeted'eii;tiii,E*Oaiwt,i4og.04464,R,:c1,1‘;;;;zw.;.:',N ,'A'.',Avv,,.'0.0.4.6.,a,J.VR ' .' , • •
„ . ..,,,,, 4 ,,,,,,,... tioiiii-0 Farrell iiita'rfotiaiiiiiieltiefi f,'.to,30,m-*,,,,'• .• .
. .
. . .
119s4.:',P#1F!It.mt4i.icP".„-sn ',..?.N , .. - ,„:,,, .,.. ..,,.,,,.,•„*,„,:! At,,,:%.,,i.,,„,,,,,,,,,,,
46iLict,u.„§epA0-41rh Astit li,,J: ileakA!Cityk.ot.,,Ii.efitot,,..t.,:liotiltzvir.orn.7.;,,i,,
....‹-•,.........„ •,,.,..s,...5 . ..v.,„,,,,.3 ,,,,,,-.,...,;,,.•;„_,k,-.1„1,..,,,I.,-..,•,_--,-..,:ic;L.: liitli.i7.4,,,... ;,:ktfik:p.,•?4,,z
161,Ys'fg',:apApp19..t!.„TIP.r,,c911,q,Prolnki",1.4),:.r',13.41-',LY,'.A1., ..1Y-qw-!?,. .,,.',,,,,,.:. 4.,,,,,:.,,:-.:,,,s,,,,,,,,,,,4..1.irgikw,,,,I,,,'6, :•.'., .' '' '• •
iiii'"&iietOpniefif on the '4...4iillf.6 .tbtittaixtieft.4.1..4gegm,Attec:Og...,,,,4-10,.,,,;(1,,,,,.„,,,„ ,.: . . ., • ., .
. .:-.. ,,,,,,„.„,..,..„.1.; ,,i,`‘..0iii'VO'{''''''''' .7:-:..."hr.MOiza':',',.:.:WgVi:-'lh'"4-0"':•"4%•Ye' ' ,• •. •'' 'of the '40r914:4'-ta:;4iiliiigksiveo...40AX,44:4•:;'•4,64„flg-,z,?•73-',j'•, ' ,.. •.
',,,',-,),-4,4••,1:1;i-i•-t-w-•'66iiiiiiiigioliyi•. ..e;164610(..,..:;.i.,,,..--,,:; -,,..••,;,„-...„; f..,;••-•;,[....;'',,,:',„.x.„--,..;',1:::.-.,..t.7,:frrY,,:•,.'‘N,,,,,,k5k,;.2,1,:!r.'r5.,':''')1„,,,,,,,-,..,.:.,,?-;•,,,„i..., ,. „.......,..,,,,...,,•;•J'A.-jA - -' :•'•t.:,•'-••n•,",c,''..i.:'•Vi0:0:1, '',....','•71",',;•,=''.i';' -n,-.,,C1.:,•::',•Wf.`*,,,i,-A•km„'5,'
Va;ii00..:0i'406,04.0ticttikg.fl 41.4.ti RzigO.V.,---tq,.';',V,40,$;t t Z.,',17.Q.44,0i0.:;;.:,:?',.,-;.:,',
64r:,.,t-'4i40,t,.?.-iiiiit',.41'4004.9.,ejatfigOikti-Nthek'ttovirzoned,lot,11-9,9s.P4,q0ictife,',,,,,,porci,,.,-;;,..- ,' •, . ,',- : •'....
.'"--i;:.2„-''.'..:,-.,?•'''g,"f:44•'-.'-.,.::.-..,:.t•-r!,„;[,i,-,.,'.,;'.:1'-,"',:..6,,„.-.'„.:.1.:64,,?„-,'•1....„,.'.4..,,„',,,.0,:.,T„.0,..,,..,..•..,,,l,.;,.is g•,„:,i,„4',-i.,i4.,, i.„,,„,„,,•,,t•,,,5,i•Vi,..,..,..,.ry,06tiiz-,NiO....,a,,,,,Q,,,o,,,A,*t,.,4F 0i,f4'.iLi,,o
i......i.,.,,,.0., 0.."6'--:.6.,-:,.4:.„•',10,4,f.... 4 0.,. #.1h,a,f':.,0-.'.irrt'•00.......,.g..,--..,0w :l..,CW.':f.'.-„.4i..':A.,,1--'1?wn•i,'4,:•0..,,,x±k,ii
IOm Renton rN100 -littoi,piaiiiii,Dit or
WOT1dii4at,40icaT,to5exxiiiPV;gookseg ,said;iiO4€1,4iit-iietitiid-iiiifI4;00W4wiotiiikolti441'fddlt0 : t.i,k-,,4P,.0qA.i,-;V,m.,44il•,7•i,;i:,0T..i,V,"'0.it1,1.ig,''s,04t, 67•,..;,.,,.;.izV.4,::t,. r:'v 4
1;;s;; ';. „4;r;;crFlaK;44, ‘ 104Pigs,m!,k A- vTP9iid4P 844iiii4-$ tioIiiyaites01teh4iqoA , r44 %
sotpigi46 tkisanwic -Or tt,1VK 640 441 0 :4*04 41, kioirtit4pt 4g$004040for
50414t6it'Takiniiookot,*1003ok:41011010i another,I*VltiRr ,§,,',,le A.,•z,,:',,:.,•:g,',,i.•v'%!s.,,,",:..,'',:',,,.-,.,-i".'c:.,,,,
'i;-,,•,,•
':.... •..,,,'
•. •.•.••,'•,
.•
...,•.
•..',.'
.,..
•
':„.•,.•,.•.
.,'..P.'•*f§tii($:ii4iiiiilsiiiii,tottwigio,-mp,offitigoioqw;ifi.titi;iotioyJiN9y.00,-,,,N-A-....,•K-',.q,,,,w.
fioid6,,5i.,:loifii*awiVigr.,10.I'ilie'..WpIlkt 9,:4-;:lliiiAltik" -.-Ottiel,0*0:07,14040,..flw.,-;•',•••;,,,•ii.,,,,.....,--,,•,;•,,,,,,-1-K-•4,,i-47,,,m,......7q•s.o..?:,or,-5-.1:::;f•-i,-.,-,,i,i' -,, --Association's:"*.itist,%-tritVrtligm---,44:,-.--• '• •• • • -•''•-••AdaecL,0•04ie.:P•t.,,'Xg•O •:', .p.,y,,, „, ..,, ,,,..,..,L,.,.., 1.30,00,0:,,,,;',,. , : •
•-i;k:',',::.i:1-tiiiiiiir.*0 ' ‘: Wlikli,A 4..„Witilfe_40_,:-:*ttfgr Op#,,,..' Ai: ir,ii*ePP.14,* ' ' • ,....'• •''''.•,' •
t
I4#---,,Okiiif ' loft-',iiiitien70: '0114•ectiriiiiili500g,Id44„*.otqvilotti4OZ4,,,,,w41( : • . ', ,
,try,".• homes- ,4 -,.,,es,,.•.,.4"4'4,1;''.:'''!^t'l•,,'tiilk,-1A044.''',.••'','4"
4.,',..oenYAwf,tiffil±fiagiMiekk,4i,tr;.4.1-ker:pAsg,tantly- ql.,0 it-1:4-•;:•14,,,,,:•-.4,i4,..m.g.',:i10`64,', ?',A),,,I,;,,,fji•,•,:
kf,,..i;•;11^0g."-TfiVit4Vinnaa'Arto ,,,,,....tifiti'-'i.166,;,iiiiiikeiiiiiii4iWio*.go.:g.:,!::g.;..:?q•'
. ..., . ,w,,,,A.5.,,,,,,,,sv.,...,...,,,...i.,-Ass,,,,,,,,,,„•,,,..,, .:,..„-,.-.. i, ..,-,.,, ,..,•_,,N.,_Apt4-.-Ap.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-;;_,,... , . • .
'.t-4,;k• sY•ERAP',"11011094'"it*!4,40.Kvorqyat,,p.04e,.P0y.gpimpihIAT40cp,..,v4...,,.-,..„.:•,,,-!'
-•,,,,,,,,;,,;,,„;.,„;.•,.,,,..,... .
gric;tiVatiktiii044',*0*§#615ii ,Afidetg6iv..i*iitt.Ahel:..t:t.ty-,:and" • • ..;• •,
re-','-
third ,ciiiiijra' iiiiiqiiitinitle '..' '''.-i•i .1'001200ed•'.piotie•eqi--,tei.„W.16i0.dik10.figitW
;
- .
•,:. .•-•,...4.;••.•,,,, . ,-,..••.,•.,,,,-.•,.••••-,y...,4•.,,,,t:-.4:,/,,,&•••,,,, ••••• ••--,5.•4,-i.- developers- •---,,:„,•••••.-.,,•••,?..t..1.40.,,,•.-0:4,-3?„,,,,,,,,,o,,
ow,t- vtiolgaboolo*k,q, titimtpii.14,,,tose,',;,•,,,ogairtst,14pc.._,::,, . , ,,„,-;%on .43,40, ,,.).- ,.
. • 'P'•O'at.i.ied4!•'ii*,,fii—sfy.401.4- '',64e8i***.;ostieibefor,..•;::i,i":=,',:i ',411',4i,F,.. et,),f...'.'g: , . • .
. ;,,,,,••-•...•,.•-•4,••••,,,....,•,•••_ , , , .,. ..,
itist.,,spririg , -,.''' *,,,•.'.l',1 .00441,Airtovel,,),-*Ii'si.itiotion:7-:',;toilloptiv*: ..Popi,-,;
...., ,..,-., to'. • . •,,,,,, , , .,..9,1",,,,k,, 't-Yc;;16.., ,,,",•okiiiti...,,,:..,.;...q:.-....;,,,,,,i ..64;',,,:'4,:gts6.x,,A;':,
' ,.'..,014.0.!aii0--Oniitt A0',„ ant multi',.a p.,,,14: , 6,04,0# .:0 • legal question •,••••„•,-;..-
,-,...,......,,, i.AVq11 ,-,`,t,' 1%,Ore'2.,r,..c:A4-1,........,..,,i0.,, _,!.i..,,..t..,...7. lf,:-.,14.,,,,..,..,,,,,,,..:,..,..!
ISI:.diVe.iliiiiimtime'41Vei ,,..k,-;i1.:,,flo:(... $).., 411,'..,); P.P..9rilfiRltl.. .--,fc,,,,,....,. ...,ze'T.
gbi-ii'ei';:,i.),Yfti'6 :Wi6i':-.'fO4,c„tioiP'ofcft,Niiiix.:,"They witiottl,116,40knie4c41-9,t.,V;AinRg •
•if,,:",r,,, , -, ,...•-, ,,„,_ ..,..,...,,,„;•-...---• ••••!,,,ilv_......,,,:',,,i, :-.Iii-',e'.' '• '•••' " '-'000Y,‘4..41, •4` ;'..,M'A-
!..:00.p„ .i:;.';'1),,,P4r,- .1.n.WAtW44.9.14,:klz.,ifIlmg:ir „P,P,•,:.P,P;P:0944g,cf?111. F,?, 4,‘,4.4',,";',1, •
-."-ready.
-i46Ateiii4i-dieaji41*egtgfdoil2,%tviondet*lioig,the'-icotts.titik,i0M1404.t.-0. ..„
l' •-••-,-•.,. -,--",4„:40 ti) l-tii.ohi . „,i,,, 4.41„.,".6i i t.ii.::.. ...ri,..,;,..,,,.,:,.:;,,,,,:,::: .
TIWIRePt.. '.., 4', •r0;. •,• :(••• .,•••=4: 9•••••••• :.-:,.1•9...',•,.-#..'4,'•iP,z-',:•'04',x0-'•okll•t:,,v,1•!:',,Vai,'4,0'-x.,•';''ci;-::- .
61g;titiii9-4iedakr.by`;,kit.iikif Iiiiiii;,-.04,4541.ai-0v0:1;,y,iWixlegakineirKiptigke,,,,kriVN-..:
(4
. .
:,....,,.,.:,..,..„.„.e...%,„..,..,„...„.„..4.. ,..,...,...,,,,,,.,.,...„..,,,„.,......:„.2.s..;.!... .„,, , ..,;,. ....,, „4s1,6: ,.„4.r.„,,,,,,o.„,.:,...i..:„.r.„.
*pgjowttcklOtPle;: .94Pgi .;!1'.'.2.. .0414,;;MA;9•411-wifiv-4vplpfk,v..941,fry ,,,
kl*tioV44%,iitoie*V100010-0: '.-.64014**014ilk:pli.o.f;,t:.1.9t.,001 .10,.'w.44t,v,::: ',';:,,-.';.:.!.
;,,
: .
Oproxitiai))42#efg:04-,ir' ..... 7'.'..4s(40,*0:,,,?,'/Asop00010,1,4V194''''4;i0.ck'•:-.....-L,,.:';-.4
0. '14.14200-lilkw'W--,tr.- tOod.',,N ',...,,.-itof.;.:,:...1‘p.,...i..0.4,-,..:kaizo„,,,,,,,,kr.",,,,•eli.,;:„;
,v4r,,,,,,Y., . .....,,,_...,,_ , , • , • idp.,.." - ,-,,- ,,,;-,•-,,,., ,...,,:,,,,,,,,,,„,i,,, pi,„•:„.•,,,...c„,y,.,..,..„,,,,,•,,,•,..;;, . .
. .01-4,-,•;w4,*0:,441 400,:fti :,,,,,&441-1,37 ,k-0?ic.101,P.KPOe_r!*;;;;,'-g• •tp.*s6,,i,,Wlif4,',,,:0,
1.1-'1'101'ii:':40v:' " -00 '''' sOh41464.00: .—oititilOs.;1::?Mvx..Mg.
. .
v'144'4'4,01214.06,116tid'' '''-j' '''' 'itifi! ' '' . :. •4'.4i.. iiii.','ies.vk.„'.fii,-.'-;0,4iii. r4'qiiiiiii..;s4i,„'-,,,,,i'1,&4;14.41,:„Si':41ele .1;
A4,,,,•.,:,.„6....„,•„„ ,l, .....4. ,:•.Y1 , • :t5.1.11.;.:4 .:'4..-',-.'- ' ' '',''-."4 .:;,i -' 1,i''r 10.0-,W
Fi'gf t.01)10 4t,r ehfik, ' t..S.*4114; ,$...14,•.1,144 ',4111.Ntit41t9,i?14._ iwkw14,...:2,4 7.14.','„:1:,,NW,4 ,..'.4y.,-, ,,a,,,,,--otioic,-.64: , - , .,1 -,,,4.xt,„, .. k,.:Ntipo.---. , „,„
ifo'l eaC614.,:4•g•Y-4Y .. ••,',19..,'i'3 •-••• ‘•. •..,1,;•t;..im P.. ;;; •••:s•,,,. his' •• .4'•'-_cit191),PF;Xk 4,401:0,,..•,.,1`,,•,i..:• •',1'-ik.!i'i', • • ,
',.'/•Irifi'it.40..V.,1-41atioit'•:!litiigOtkii0 '..?•Aii;/JtfitiOt,-,.',Pleri„ M'''i; .t0A.0',.!4:0•40.qWf.*•1414.';•0:"AY
otIti,
. .
• . ,,. . '`•,!'i06,,'F6l„..,.1:;,'.';1,1,••1‘, f-o,.-,,•.r,,,i,.,,,g;,,•4.,-;0:•,••,i•';.'sl-.;,,.•,•:L,,'e)i-.-,,„,,,4•.,'k..61W.,,,At.04--,b•4,1,lf.:,•t„,•,i,.-p,;,''"•:.-•—„".-'..'•.-.;:e--'.J,'„v,,.",•,*,,.*. *,..A•--..,'x,„,rV, •".,Vif,•,a,v,.i.,:pi,..',rc,':,,-p-..,.,t,,i,•,r.Y,••,.•, Af0
f,.`,ot-.„},'.i:,,,',.3,7:•05,;•,.',4 t•-",,e,',,1..-..,.ii..",0;.,•,.'„N•:-0.)..-,,0„.:-...6-.'.-,1iV.0. 0-m,,fW'•.•W4,.-•,-u..'..:,0a•'-•,p'i••Aet-.',,n•',rnf,ot-4-,•i3O
crease trirfRA ,r I ,'No Vested I$Afo4_',,;l'•'4,,11,.0 1S",.-,1.iS,..,;'V,-t,,,.v•R1,4v•••:.%,•",.,.,"•'1;I,";AA,-'':•,...1_;-gr's,,
Last:iaiAt* it144ipliaitji011#10g40r10icia
4101,*coi9ni3t,apt et A # g= ..oiiw10i, . 144} 4r1Iy if1PpdiSk010t4440glotin OriL004*4V
gihfrt *f$,o fio:co Nty,Aikovetfgitf4tsiailketli.;iw,-,t,1':4..:t t,.-1p,,.l,-.,%I*,,,),t•kk
ii6at w ' .%11-rezon0g„Ac 0 they were ptegsE.011k0
AyYittet0,40# 301emsfk, " le44*?ostipp ,Py ,:4Mtqr: •
te:$14n=AQ..rpxopOrtytprgkt e04f1$4101 qk',';.''fev,o•.i',r.ti:,:,-A,i3vic.,w l,'s;,,i•i.4,.,"'!.,;4,..,.:P,,71—0:r,e•.',,:40.-.;)4.-A1A,:,,...,..;:!':,..,..,',,1..,4Y..%Pp.'—.,,6--...:,-1,,F;,4.,,'..•,,,,I3c.-,':i<-,..,,,,'l...;;f'-,v...,,.,.,,.,.-4.,;,.,'t.-
.,,'..•„:T.,4,.k,:.
jY
. •.
, •
,• .
...
.•
,..
•.
•,,,.4,..1 i r
,90,,,,-;,,,:,,,:‘.y4:21irm$•;..1*g•t-x..W..-•%/•tvo..,,,,•.:,',g:;.,-•4. ...;n•,',•Kr • ,
-1.4?Af-ezfehpf..,to,:,0•4i;":;;•..W_I. • r',IN;_!-?'.......1^(",,,-.•&41,4k,lit4141.'",•,-,-,,r,.2V,,,,,•,'
,,40.3 , , #,O''',. ..".•,12. .qt.ilt,i,'.;:y". ., .
,?;,_.!,,i.,x,:j .:-,•;.t.„,..:;!,;',?,'.;•,,v.,,,,:,.-:,,,:;:::,7-,iho..:,.,.,;,:,,,::,t;,-i.tbd..,q;;3'',',SIV:i.'::::!;,.." ''...''';:''.-.V.-..--1-.:;'f,:': '",,,..c!P.- !:'?:-,';',1"1::':'' .1-:.: ,••:'.,"2',.,;:'4,'i,(,,!.''.',•':-S,'''';'. ,,.':','-..
:::';.---.::‘,.'v:',;',e.-:'',•'-'.s.',--: :';':;v' ' P' A ;? :;,,,,--,•, ,•-:-:•,.::..::• ;:,•-:',..;-..',' •:,-...-...,-;-.•:,:-::;-,'.,':- ',•,:t'i`":•,;:,I'.1,:*.;-:: .• ., ) ', •''
".',,,-• •,--,;',...'-'- ',-!:'-'-',4'f•F 'i.7..:',''f'..,.?.,1-•,i':','!::4"',1,:.''..:','...,-.y.-::.v.- .•.!.- ';..', •,4.N-!--, •'!•,,',,,:,•:-.. ;1., .-.- :-•.;,. ..,•r•,•,..,. •..,-•1,..:,',.,,,'-':,.,,. ., ' •. ‘: ...:
.. . , .., ..
. . .
i ,•'---
. . . •
. ...---
, ... .
.)
• .
,. ... . .
. '
. . . '
, .
. .
. . ,.._. .
. . ..
. ..
o RE ,
�c o THE CITY OF RENTON
411 :_T�.
J . ♦I .�} MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH.9805
5
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�.., CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • 235-2550
0 �
po0�4Tf Z�����
D SEP
• October 14 , 1977
The Honorable C . J . Delau-renti , Mayor
Members of the City Council
Renton ; . Washington
RE : PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEPJIAREA GENERALLYSIVE BOUNDLBY ,
RENTON HILL PLANNING AREA (THAT
FAI-405 ON THE WEST , CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH , THE
HILLSIDNARDIGHTDOFE4JAYEONATHE �OUTH)THE EAST , AND THE
POWERLE
Dear Mayor and Council Members :
The Planning Commission submits for your consideration recom-
mendations regarding the above described area . This action is
pursuant to the City Council referral and request of June 6 ,
1977 .
The. Planning Commission has conducted a series of public
hearings and work meetings regarding the Renton Hill area ,
including' a detailed analysis of land use , circulation , and
community. facilities . . The analysis and recommendation of, the
Comprehensive Planning Committee is submitted in the attached
report dated October 12 , 1977 .
At the .conclusion of the Planning Commission public hearing
of October 12th , the Planning Commission concurred in the
recommendations of .the Comprehensive Planning Committee and
forwarded the committee report to you for your consideration .
It. is recommended that the City Council set November .2lst as
a public hearing . date on the ,said ,recommendations . Your con-
currence is , respectfully requested .
Very tru. y you s ,
atdon Y . . i c en
P anning rector
GYE :wr
Attachments
•,
J LIC NOTIJE
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY- OF RENTON .
PLANNING COMMISSION
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON
SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
DESCRIBED BELOW:
® s
PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA
IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE
EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH.
r
, _
ltd),4, Ili DO tif tit4,1,-%:iiiit 1, .....,.---, - ii---=.5 --''': ., ,\
Cir
IN" �� t6E 1 W w
_ L. � w
_
. 4tiii, r - i, , is r—
iyit
I
+ ,,
._,
•,,, nee • ,, _ i . ; I
rm� i _.,,, .1- ,._, : _i
M _ - L1W .,
l k..
. �� _I. • :7
1 /7 k. ..1 1 ) 1 . !;"rorilon [.._ .-o.-
// ...1 on i' f 1 N berTw
�u r ; • ') PyV -
\--•\,::::::.:,....,-,--,_______________ __ ...? ______ ss:ss,_ ./.•
T� 11 _
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT
COMMENTS IN WRITING.
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT:
CITY OF RENTON — PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S.
RENTON, WA. 98055
.• s
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
OCTOBER 12, 1977
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Clark Teegarden , Chairman
Comprehensive Planning Committee
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL AREA
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING
INTRODUCTION:
By action of the Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting
on the above subject matter, the Comprehensive Planning Committee
was requested to study the area in question and report back to the
Commission on October 12 , 1977. The attached public hearing notice
(public hearing , September 14 , 1977 ) describes the area to be con-
sidered and is generally defined as the Renton Hill Comprehensive
Planning Area . (Refer to Public Hearing Notice. )
For the purposes of the Committee ' s deliberations , the Comprehensive
Plan is defined as the offical statement of the City of Renton
establishing major policies concerning desirable future development.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - DEFINITION AND PURPOSE :
The Comprehensive Plan consists of the Goals , Objectives , and Poli-
cies ; Land Use Element; Circulation Element; Community Facilities
Element; and Definitions . Proposed developments should be reviewed
against the Comprehensive Plan to insure that growth is consistent
with the Plan.
The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are : .
I To improve the physical and social environment of the
city as a setting for human activities - to make it more
functional , beautiful , decent , healthful , interesting ,
and efficient;
" r
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Three
In order for the Plan to maintain effectiveness , it should be reviewed
periodically. Conditions might change and unforeseen events may occur
which might necessitate a re-evaluation.
BACKGROUND:
As background to the study of the area in question , the Committee con-
ducted a field trip of the area involved and studied in detail the
existing land use , the characteristics of the existing development , and
the physical features of the land, including topography and drainage.
During the course of the work sessions by the committee , representatives
from property owners in the Hill area were present and provided input
in the matters discussed. The matter of access was considered in some
detail in terms of the existing street rights-of-way, traffic circulation ,
existing street conditions , the parking and access problems to individual
properties , as well as the matter of general traffic circulation.
The study area for comprehensive planning purposes overlapped into
adjacent areas ; and, therefore, the study of the committee encompasses .
areas beyond the immediate boundaries of the Renton Hill area , particu-
larly as it relates to traffic circulation , potential development,
need for community facilities , and general area-wide impact of future
development.
The consideration of the committee was basically restricted to con-
sideration of the Comprehensive Plan elements : land use , circulation ,
and community facilities . . in regard to said elements , the natural
characteristics of the area were also considered. :
•
Comprehensive Planning 'Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Two
• To promote the public interest, the interest of the city
at large as well as the interests of, individuals , or
special groups ;
To facilitate the democratic determination and implementa-
tion of city policies on development;
O To effect political and technical coordination in
development;
O To inject long-range considerations into the determination
of short-range actions ; and
® To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on
the making of political decisions on the development of the
city.
The. Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as a guide to help resolve
some of the development problems confronting municipal officials and
the people they represent. The Plan takes into account existing con-
ditions and future needs , and attempts to express the best reasonable
consensus that can be achieved at a given time as to the character
and direction of future growth.
The Plan is of necessity general in its proposals . It must be flexible ,
since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect
the community . The Plan is not a zoning ordinance, although it makes 1
significant recommendations for future land use. The Plan is not pre-
cise. It does not represent engineering accuracy, nor does it claim
to predict exactly the future use of every parcel of property, or
insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Comprehens•tve Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Five
north adjacent to the Cedar River.
5 . The area includes several large tracts of undeveloped areas ,
which represent both potential single family and multi -family
residential development. Development in accordance with the
present plan would result in increased land use densities .
6. The Committee also reviewed the geological conditions of the
Hill area , including consideration regarding mines previously
located in the area. It was initially recognized that the Hill
has large underlying coal beds , some of these beds having been
mined-out. Said coal beds represent not only a future energy
resource potential but also a hazard to any surface development
in terms of possible mine subsidance. The extent of such
development hazard is unknown and will vary with location . It
is recognized , however, such hazards must be considered in
terms of existing and future development.
CIRCULATION:
1 . The Committee initially recognizes that the present circulation
to Renton Hill 'is restricted to one access point (at Third and
Mill ) , which essentially creates a large cul -de-sac-type situation .
2 . The present 40 foot street rights-of-way restrict access and
limit parking , particularly in that area north of South 7th
Street. The existing topography precludes any substantial
improvement of existing rights-of-way to allow improved access
and parking.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Four
LAND USE ELEMENT:
FINDINGS:
1 . The Renton Hill area is primarily a single family residential
neighborhood with some limited apartment and duplex use inter-
mixed. The extent of multi -family residential development is
limited at this time and is primarily concentrated along Mill
Avenue South and located westerly of Cedar.
2. Physical characteristics of the area indicate that, while an older
area of the community, the area is basically sound in terms of
both building and general physical potential for upgrading . This
potential is presen.tl.y being recognized by many property owners
in the area , and the area is considered ' a desirable single family
residential neighborhood.
3. While th.e area has been in a state of transition , with increased
land values , the physical amenities of the Hill area , such as view,
makes the area highly desirable for residential development.
4 . The existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for Renton
Hill is primarily single family residential with low and medium
density multi -family residential designations between Mill Avenue
South and Cedar Avenue South and extending southerly to and includ-
ing a larger tract of medium density multi -family residential .
located at the southwesterly edge of the Hill area. The hillside
areas to the north are presently designated as greenbelt, with
the existing industrial development adjacent to the railroad
right-of-way and a low density multi -family designation to the
111 .
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Seven
in traffic circulation problems beyond those created by the
immediate residents of the Hill area.
2 . The existing park facility, however, is fully developed and is
used intensively by the community at large. The Renton School District
presently has a 10 acre elementary school site located easterly
of said park. A school development at this site is not contem-
plated at this time or in the near future, due to the limited
elementary population that might potentially attend said school .
NATURAL SYSTEMS :
1 . The Hill area , due to its nature , has large undeveloped hillside
areas with steep slopes , providing a natural greenbelt drainage
system.
2. Disturbance through new development represents a potential hazard
in terms of slides and increased runoff problems .
RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based on it-s analysis , the Committee recommends as follows :
LAND USE:
1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill area,
the Committee recommends that the Hill area north of the Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission right-of-way be
designated as single family residential .
2. The steep hillside areas , powerline rights-of-way , and natural
drainage courses be established as greenbelt areas , in addition
to those presently designated on the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan .
•
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Six
3 . The parking for the residential uses is primarily on-street
rather than off-street; and it is recognized that topography
limitations preclude, in many cases , development of acceptable
off-street parking spaces .
4. Increased traffic has occurred as the result of the extensive
use of Phillip Arnold Park located at the top of the Hill .
This impact is particularly noticeable on Renton Avenue . On-street
parking has also impacted the adjacent residential neighborhood.
5 . The existing Arterial Street Plan indicates the extension of
Mill Avenue extending in a southeast direction , connecting to a
secondary arterial serving the Tiffany Park area . The present
Plan also projects the extension of Grant Avenue South from South.
11th to Puget Drive.
6. The extension of Mill Avenue South with the connection as proposed
does not appear to be physically feasible due to the existing devel -
opment_ that has occurred and the steep topography.
7. New development of any type would, in the opinion of the committee,
further impact the existing circulation system unless alternative
means of access were provided to serve the area,: The Committee
further recognizes , however, that providing additional access
could further compound the existing problem and make the situation
more critical .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES: .
1 . The existing park has been utilized as a facility serving beyond
the immediate neighborhood. The basic result has been an increase
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Nine
2. The Committee further recommends that the 'City pursue the possibil -
ity of expansion of Phillip Arnold Park to the southeast , since it
appears that the potential area would allow reasonable expansion
of said facility.
3. The area designated low density multi -family residential adjacent
to the Cedar River north of the railroad be redesignated future
recreation .
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Eight
CIRCULATION :
1 . The land use designations as reflected in the existing Compre-
hensive Plan was based upon provision of additional access to the
Renton Hill area to the south and southeast. The extension of
Mill Avenue South is not physically feasible ; and, therefore ,
it is recommended by the Committee that such designation on the
Arterial Street Plan be deleted.
2. Extensive input on the part of the residents in the Hill area
indicates the desire to continue the limited access to the Hill
(Third and Mill ) as it is presently constituted. The purpose of
such limitation is to enhance the amenities of the Hill area as
a residential community and preclude through access . It is , -
therefore , further recommended that the proposed Grant Avenue
connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of
access to the Hill .
3. It is recognized that improved access will be necessary to serve
the properties to the south and southeast of the Renton Hill area
at such time as they are developed. The intent of the Committee ' s
recommendations is that such access be provided from the south .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . Retain the present community facilities designations for the Renton
, Hill area , including the park and school site , recognizing that the .
use of the school site for an elementary school may or may not be
feasible in the near future.
562 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 ;;
May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM I'-`
563 s:
,
- preclude its use for any purpose to which it is reason- F
ably adapted. He is required to show that there is no intersecting the property, and the need to control traffic i
possibility for profitable use under the restrictions of and noise in the area. In addition, we have already noted ''
the ordinance, or alternatively that the greater part of
the value of the property is destroyed by it, although that many neighbors voiced their fears that permitting „,,
there may be some slight use remaining. Adaptability, retail uses would bring more people into the area, -with s:_
it has been declared, envisages economic as well as attendant traffic congestion and noise; many, in fact,
functional use, and assumes not the most profitable favored a rezone of the site to a purely residential classifi-
use, but that some permitted use can be profitable. cation, without even the sedate business activities contem-
(]Footnotes omitted.) 8 E. McQuillin, Municipal Corpora- plated under "neighborhood commercial." The town council
tions 25.45, at 111 (3d ed. rev. 1976). proceedings of necessity followed an informal format, lack- r?
We agree with the trial court that Mayer failed in its mg the niceties of courtroom evidentiary procedures so that .,
burden of proving the ordinance was adopted arbitrarily `` `( the intere
sted citizens could express their views. The zoning ,and capriciously. Mayer relies heavily on the opinions as to f decision, therefore, was based on opinion and speculation as
reduction in value presented to the council, which allegedly to the future of the area and the need to establish the sub- �`"
demonstrate that the rezone would preclude use of the k ject property as a transitional area according to the corn-
property for "any useful purpose to which it is reasonably b, prehensive plan. With the trial court, we agree it would
adapted." There are, however, certain deficiencies associ- have been preferable for the town council to have based its
ated with reliance on the opinion letters. Neither letter ;
P decision on a more factual basis. We believe, nevertheless
compared the property's value if used for purposes allowed that the zoningordinance has supportI
in the record and is
under neighborhood commercial zoning with uses permitted not a "wilful and unreasoningaction, in disregard ofE:fg facts E
under the current retail classification. Instead, both worked k and circumstances." Northern Pac. Transp. Co. v. .
from the premise that the highest and best use would be for }, Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n,.69 Wn.2d 472, 478,
apartments, and compared that value of the property with i 418 P.2d 735 (1966). Where there is room for two opinions,
its value if zoned neighborhood commercial; this approach t a zoning action is not arbitrary and capricious when exer- ar
ignored the fact that apartments were no longer permitted , cised honestly and upon due consideration, even though a (;;, ,
under the retail classification, and that' the council wasdifferent conclusion might have been reached. Bishopv.
being asked to consider an alleged devaluation of the prop- (..-. .- :,,471)+. Houghton, 69 Wn2d 786, 420 P.2d 368 (1966). �'r
b� Ry.,
erty if changed from uses permitted under "retail" to those 3 - We turn next to the allegedly confiscatory application of ,
r
possible under "neighborhood commercial." In addition, the zoning ordinance to Mayer's `°`"y property. Mayer relies k'
neither letter explained the method of valuation employed _ upon Hauser v. Arness, 44 Wn2d 358, 267 P.2d 691 1954 ",`"
in arrivingat the stated figures, ( ) [44
gures, and one author expressly which congaing language supportive of property rights, such I i:?
disclaimed any status as a competent appraiser. , as the following at page 369: `,
The trial court characterized the case in support of a ;,Vi
�f_,:
Zoning laws that result in relatively little gain or benefit :
rezone as "skinny. It consisted primarily.of the town to the public while inflicting serious injury or loss on the '0,
planner's dissertations on aa ,
purpose of the comprehensive • property at owner have always been held y this court to be
plan'to impose buffer zones between commercial and resi- - confiscatory and void.
dential activities, the progression of the area to a residen- Mayer argues that the opinion letters show a severe reduc- i;�3'
tial neighborhood, the projected future for' the roads tion in value, that the public would gain little from the f '`
rezone, and that the action amounts to a confiscation. �''•,'
564 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM 565
[2] We have noted the failure of the opinion letters to Section 1 of ordinance No. 475 provides:
competently demonstrate that the rezone from" "retail" to The intent of this ordinance is to establish certain .;
"neighborhood commercial" would diminish the property's interim zoning modifications in the zoning code of the
value. While we agree there must be some benefit to the Town pending the adoption of a new comprehensive plan
public before a zoning decision will be allowed to diminish and new zoning ordinance, and to prohibit development
of a nature which appears contrary to the intent of the
the value of property, here the public in the form of many present comprehensive plan and the general welfare of
area residents, argued that they would be benefited by the the citizens of the Town. -
uses permitted under a rezone and, indeed, would prefer Despite the use of the word "interim" in the above section,
even greater restrictions. Moreover, the opinion letters of we do not believe that it is in fact an interim zoning ordi-
_ Mayer's appraisers spoke of a reduction in value of a rox-y pp p pPliDnance. There is no reference to any emergency situation,
imately one—half, but there was no evidence the property `' nor is there any indication in the ordinance or elsewhere in
could not be put to a profitable use, as required by Carlson 4�. the record that the Town deviated from the regular notice
v. Bellevue, supra. By way of comparison, in Carlson the and hearing procedures specified in RCW 35.63.100 et seq. c`;, -
court upheld a rezone that allegedly reduced the value of Ordinance No. 475 in fact makes several substantive
the property from $60,000 to $2,500. It is with poor grace changes in the zoning code. It reclassifies several tracts of
that Mayer complains- of a reduction in value when it land, eliminates two use districts,.amends the comprehen- 1
acquired the property at a time when it was zoned more sive plan, and, as pertinent here, redefines the retail use
restrictively than "neighborhood commercial," then district so as to prohibit the construction of duplexes and
obtained an apparently greater valuation due to a 1967 , multi—family units. These zoning changes, being permanent -
change but chose not to build as then permitted, and now to the extent any zoning ordinance is permanent until i
begrudges the town's attempt to fall back to an intermedi- modified or replaced by a later one, are sustainable as an "'
if
ate zoning position. In any event, Mayer has not borne its 5` attempt "to prohibit development . . . contrary to the
i.
burden of showing such a diminution in value as to amount intent of the present comprehensive plan." (Italics ours.)
to a confiscation. Secs 1 R. Anderson, American Law of We cannot agree with Mayer's contention that the ordi-
Zoning § 3.25 (2d.ed., 1976).. rik) nance is an example of interim zoning which must fall
- --' Finally we address-the challenges to ordinance No. 475, ('''"; because it fails to declare a termination date and was not
• i.e:, that it is an example of 'illegal "interim zoning" and passed as an emergency measure. That it does not contain
that it should be applied to parcels.zoned "retail" only after those elements is further evidence that the Town simply i
I A'
the effective date of the ordinance. enacted changes in its existing zoning laws to effectuate the i,.,
Interim zoning describes a process whereby - govern- purposes of its then existing comprehensive plan; such an ,.<.,
mental body in response '::
.to an emergency situation tempo- ordinance was®vithin the Town's authority. McNaughton v. Ii? ,
racily establishes an ordinance to classify or regulate uses of Boeing, 68 Wn.2d 659, 414 P.2d 778 t 1-;;.
(1966). ;,,; ,
land pending either revision of the existing zoning code or [3] The rule on retroactivity of zoning changes is that _
�:,:
adoption of a finals` comprehensive zoning plan. 1 A. C
application for a building permit vests in the applicant the i; :
Rathcopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning § 11.01 (4th right to use his property as then permitted, and that a sub-
ed. 1975); Smith v. Skagit County, 75 Wit 2d 715, 453 P.2d sequent change of zone cannot divest him of that right.
' 832 (1969); see RCW 36.70.790. State ex rel. Ogden v. Bellevue, 45 Wn.2d 492, 275 P.2d ;i`.
•
-
6 j MAYER BUILT HOMES 4 v. STEILACOOM i May 1477 May 1977 BOGY GRAHAM,C3HEN'& W�MPOLD 567
•
•
899 l954). Mayer had not, however for a permit tol The judgment is affirmed.
build a structure on its property W- ;es permitted PETRIE, C.J., and Pl coot a✓; cl, Pro Ten2., concu
r.
under the retail classification prior to aaoption of ordinance
•
No. 475. The ordinance, on its face, limits the uses for.
property in the then existing retail use district. Once the
ordinance disallowed certain uses within the retail district,
Mayer's property was subject to the reduced usages possi-
ble, no other use having vested. `
Although not explicitly argued, Mayer's challenge to the •
7 retroactivity of the Town's zoning changes is subject to •
another interpretation. Ordinance No. 475 forbade the con- _ -
struction of multi-family dwellings on Mayers property,
having eliminated that use from the retail district. The •
effect was to prevent such construction until l a5sage of
ordinance No. 496, so that it would have been futile for
Mayer to have applied for a permit to build a multi-family. - . •
structure after adoption of ordinance No. 475. Given that •
,
fact, Mayer's argument can be interpreted to be that, if
ordinance No. 475 is invalid, then the result must be that •
Mayer would have been entitled to obtain a multi-family '
permit up until passage of ordinance No. 496, which could
not lawfully relate back to the passage of an earlier, invalid ,
ordinance so as to prevent the construction of multi-family
dwellings prior to ordinance No. 496. In sum, if ordinance
No. 496 validly prohibits multi-family dwellings on Mayer's :: .
property, it does so only as of its own effective date, and ,
invalidation of ordinance.No. 475 would, until that date,
• leave Mayer where it was before adoption of ordinance No. _- . - - .-
.. 475, namely, able to build.a multi-Gamily dwelling as then .
permitted in "retail." This argument, however, is premised , ' -
. on the invalidity of ordinance No. 475. With that ordinance - '
• having been upheld, the argument falls. - .
•
4: .. .
A
4
560 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM
561
up nearby. Among the uses allowed in a neighborhood $8,500 to $10,500 as "retail" versus $4,500 to $7,500 under
proposed neighborhood commercial usage. He agreed that
commercial zone are single-family homes and duplexes,
multi-family residential development was the highest and
professional and business offices, public and semi-public
uses, barber and beauty shops, travel bureaus, and "spe- best use, but seemed to assume that such usage was still
cialty stores" dealing in antiques, hooks, food, flowers, gifts, permitted in the retail district. The council continued the
jewelry and photography. Designed to reduce the ordinary meeting to allow study of the reports, and upon reconven-
commercial impact of these uses 'were such features as ing on May 21, 1974, it affirmed assignment of Mayer's
restrictions on building height and sign size, a requirement property into the neighborhood commercial classification.
for side yards, a limitation on number of employees, and a [iJ We consider first Mayer's argument that the town
requirement for advance approval of proposed building council's rezoning of his property must be voided due to its
plans. Mayer's property was among those sites subject to t arbitrary and capricious nature. A zoning act is subject to rezone under this ordinance. . judicial review only for manifest abuse of discretion. The
The matter went first before the town planning commis- party asserting that a legislative authority has abused its
4
sion in a public hearing on February 11, 1974, attended by discretion by acting arbitrarily and capriciously, i.e., with if
Mayer's president and•.several people living near Mayer's out consideration and in disregard of the facts, has the
f burden of proof; if the zoning classification is fairly debat-
property. The town planner, Dennis Clarke, explained that
the proposed creation of a new zoning classification was to able, it will be sustained. State ex rel. Myhre v. Spokane,
satisfy the policy of the comprehensive plan, i.e., that corn- 70 Wn.2d 207, 210, 422 P.2d 790 (1967). A municipality's
patible land uses should be combined and separated from zoning action should be reviewed with the following
approach in mind, as adopted in Carlson v. Bellevue, 73
noncompatible uses by buffer strips, transitional uses, and
other, similar devices. As things then existed, there was n®
Wn.2d 41, 51, 435 P.2d 957 (1968):
way to buffer residential areas from the noise, traffic and In determining whether or not a zoning ordinance is
hearing comments reasonable in its application to a given parcel of land,
other characteristics of retail use. After
from members of the audience, many of whom were con- among the factors to be taken into consideration are
the character of the neighborhood, existing uses and i
cerned about the, adverse effect retail use would have on
zoning of nearby property, the amount by which prop-
their nearby homes, the planning commission unanimously
recommended adoption of the new classificati erty values are decreased, the extent to which the dim-
on and inution of values promotes the public health, safety, f
assignment to it of four parcels, including Mayer's. On May morals or welfare, the relative gain to the public as
7, 1974, the town council conducted a compared with the hardship imposed upon the indi-
omme hearing to vidual owner, the suitability of the subject property for
l'i:
consider adoption of the neighborhood commercial zoning
ordinance. The council heard Mayer's position and those of the purpose for which. it is zoned, and the length of
the town planner and objecting neighbors of the property._ time the property has remained unimproved, consid-
Mayer submitted two reports on the financial effect the
receive due consideration.ered in the context of the land development in the
rezone would have on its property. An appraiser opined
upon the validity of a zoning ordinance, an aggrieved area. No single factor is controlling but each must
that the highest. and best use of the property was for But to sustain an attack
apartments, in which case it Was worth $12,000; this he property owner must show that if the ordinance is ;z
contrasted with a value off $5,500 under neighborhood corn- enforced the consequent restrictions on his property
,,mercial usage. A reap estate broker valued the property at _
..y.,' 5 8 BUILT HOMES v S >1.ACooM May 3977 > .
,' May 19'17. Bi>�T ii®1► v STBlLACO�DRq : .,
[No:{1'82 2. Division Two. :May11,.1977.j. -
.
_ ;�_ _ - Edwin :heeler and-�`Iutchi Plumb &: UVheele for n.
_ - . MAYER BUILT Horeas Iavc•, Appellant,..v; T.. . . . _
res oiadents:' 1:.:.
o ..ST3a.Acoo 3 „ET-AL, Res ondents. = ;
[1] Zoning — 'Judicial:Review - Arbitrary.'anal Ca ricious _ REE3i .J•—_ Ma er B_ uilt Homes,- Inc:, (1Vlayer� appealsl'""t2.--:12;
u
Actson.' ItDetermmatiera:A party asserting that a zoning action 3`;=. :: frown a superior;court'dismissal:::of_ petitions (I).:seal 3g
is arbitrary'and capricious has the burden•of proving it was taken P _
- without co•nsideration and•in disregard of.facts and circumstances.A ' _ _ review of the Town of Steilacoom'S adoption'of, ,31ew zon-
!! ing,classification encompassing-property_owned by:Mayer, i s
• _ = zoning action'is not invalid merely°_because it'prevents the.roost
{ + r e • ' d' 2 seekin to 'compel-.the•town`to"issue a';permit for .;
profi able rase of prop;�st,'.or'because a-dafa"erent aciio?i s 2ms pref- ,. )' g- - :-:
'' ,,
le to the"court. ` - - construction of ari apartment ®n the pr®party;.;On appeal, 'x,
A:
' -- Mayer.contends that the tovvra'.acted arbitrarily and-capri- t:b,•'
• [2]-ion- Validity CanRscati®n-:;--What Co�titantea.•The Y f s.~
' burden of showing such;a<:di a:,ution-of property value.resulting g ciouslyin rezoning the. j ro ea° and, hat the act.:so
;�;�ro::.: • ``` subjectP P Y' • •(tit
`' - from zoning es to amount to a confiscation is on the person asserting reduced its Value as to amount to-an uncor3stitutlonal Con-'
it.<A reduction in,the value of a. cuing propertyis justified.b
an
i i y fiscation:=-in'addition, 11/Iayer:.challeaages.flee legality of ',
' `_benefit to the public so long-as some.profitable use of the property _ r:to_.the new zoning;enactment,;winch zs'
,., = ordinance passed prio g. °>=
remains.' .
. removed from the zoning district certain uses thea3 - ft=°
- 13] n +g• —�etrunc 3vat�, este Ri A -
: lssadowneg does We. a#firr 3 fog;the:;rasa®_- -set forth �_
,�r -ble to the,-Property:
b=
'tn n.�.ffiOt-•-a oars rights`undea mustang re a � l eon -e t unto a hcat is �.' �"`
g o p
iF.
_ '4
'lo
•
'F:
- .lie .
for ual �" e r anode a b Brant efts which a change'In the Perrin_ - nr
. p t,. pe -•
_ _ . . `tealaem®n�,ado�fed a.:comp .,.
_. Ian`1962 ythe Towrs'of S P -
- uses does not'effect'hiaaf.::
x: : _ rive•pleb for its future grove. It established various zoning :
� ss
Yr + ; Nature of.fiction:the plaintiff's property was affected classifications arid,assigned,most.of the•property'within the
by.an.ordinance.removing."apartment""houses":as a.Permit- corporate limits to a "locv.densi y residential" clan ification, + t>_
,, "' - `ta•d'use-in an . zonnna classification a d b , a later
existing g Y tine most restrictive there available•.Ini196a-Mayer ac aired sj1,
1-'' -" •chan �e.ira_clsgsification to-or a which did_not ermit a art- - s. !t-
g P. P tevo;pa' •• is'so classified. These':lay iaraiffipro�" --• ' . 9 5'l;
r ' s
;- • were.rezoned:."retail "`a class which allowed ce* s$==
• rnent lionises: ,In scp.A�°aVe aet�ons,:-the'Piagnti :'clialleriged` ,- when,both, 9 _
In tie,:�raid�ty o the later change egad sought the issuance of a ,,, , _'co•ffirnerciai :uses::a�3d arena at=:•boa ea.;II1!F
�' eels
:-��: bualdaaa er3n3t-for-aaa a artar3ent'house:. `("i' ore:tl3e�,lar ei`.-of p 9P P - - built °an= a .• .er uelit e"'•' �
1 -
.:>:'?. ;;_t„ ro"ert -not',at issue here3ra:_, `he smalfler:parcel the Subject subject -r:
� � S��ern®�<.�oaa�t: �"he,plaaraL3fr`'s actions.�vere'disi�iiss$d� _▪ - .,P...P. . Y.. _- _
im ..
t.ail g - -
:'-<'':'`':',.,`:<. ,.'agar roved'-w3tho building
-_.< -- b the ti ,raor.__ou_,t for..'P3_ s __ n``< d"' aPPea?,t�
��.a_... _,'_ .y., .� P - fount loos. 225i4f _ -
ffi ed �- >_ _. :• ... 'h "n`=oi�_: uie'`12, 1973 ,:
.,.:..�...,. r . ' _ .:-�:.. ' - .:'_ --=.�. .r,... - f�� `�havis� :bee ®u �av:fo�'•it.,�. e � - .) 9 ':.
229671 .I once. .' e -J. oh. _ -i' ;Pe
a: >Y'= - _� e ebru 2fi 1975•,...,. .q . .
4.
melts a
_,,.. .•,:- o...• e max...-><. - `.:i -- n
Ci. •- ®� �75 ��wlaie
s, -. a o led`: 9. h"�.
_3�,• L4
_V 31
- 4 -
o `�of�'A fin zon- y� `�,`_:-
-Appeals:
T1►e C Lrt eels• ds the
���- _ =fay it PPis
Tio
ult �'L
- -"construction: - -
nStr
he.: CO P
7
„-. an : act_ons..�,•- •uest3on-,n t•.-to_.h •v - - -
:.: :,��'. -, . g..._, ._ . . ._ ...0 o . . a e ._been;:arbitrery-,.arid-'-_ =:::�-,;:-,.;.:,- :n",:..
�r::��>-:-•.. :... . ... _ .,. . . _ . ;_._,., --' •i::us tract:::ii�'�cam�3:;h:-the.:oar_eel lay :.-��� ,
_ ii dzrdell r. --no :c. .. tea_ e die
ice ri:cious`or';eonfiscato :'arid•
;'not,.,to constitute<inn ro er- '.,.',. , .:. .
,: g3' P. P _ his,ordmartce;a„t.,„ .,,tune: ;.,
-liana' t ''„n
w.: • er. id--szot•cha e
g.
inter3na;.•zoning .oa=au'tnvaaad retroactive application:of a Y<.', ;;-. �'. .,,. 'fox`-adoption', a 1
f arl iri 1�7�,:tile"'tuv i pia 3aaer petitioned. P.
z ire
f =;,_, *. %r yF
033 sale t1 :t�i • .-.c e t:`� e � al c®ur a �i" �;az �°med'`' --
"k ' . t_s'u s sal is
...,,, '' .. a..:496 T wlai igiti as:-*a-e
,.,. _: . „ .,,• `r :.. ,.;..w =:. • r's:A4', ,o -:', -- mercial <�o: flo t
«r . or i�n ..:li�darta�z,.for.'' ''s 71 4.,- •,_.-1 1. _ ze�aai ag,clasatlication,of weir -ex lacy re..;
,
mereaai•�,u s:
areas,<-,of--.trarasa�amxa4:.betv�eeaa eg�stin coda •
:1'• taborl��ods-th ,iaacl.: ;,._...
._�.. - 2. - • s denti�.la:aaei �_„:
, . le..re �'
, _ ro art anti-t gb,
.P
.., , :. ...._-.;..._..--,. ,.:: :...,:: ,,-- ,.,:.:_::-. - ,._.:,.,: _.,-,:-;,--__'.":,-,,.,.,_-,, .,_, ,,-.=,..:._,:::: -.,1::::::.,:, :[..,::
•
41
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION •
PURL MEETING
OCTOBER 12, 1977
• MINUTES
•
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian Gain, Logan Garrison, Sandra Gist,
Anthone Mola, Barbara Schellert, Clark Teegarden, Joan Walker.
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Thomas Buckingham.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director; Willis Roberts,
Recording Secretary.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walker at 8:00 p.m.', who
led the Pledge of Allegiance.
• 2. ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Gist. All members responded present •
With the exception of Commissioner Gain, who arrived at 8:03 p.m. ,
and Commissioner Buckingham (on vacation) . It was noted that newly
appointed Commissioner Robert Kingen will not be available until
mid-November.
ACTION:
MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE ABSENT COMMISSIONER BE
EXCUSED. MOTION CARRIED.
3. APPROVAL .OF MINUTES:
The Chairman called for .corrections or additions to the minutes of
August 10, 1977. Commissioner Garrison noted that the roll call
vote at the top of page. eight should be corrected to include a "no"vote
by Commissioner Gain. Noting no further corrections or additions,
IT WAS, MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT .THE AUGUST 10,
• 1977, MINUTES BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. MOTION CARRIED.
The Chairman called for corrections or additions to the minutes of
September 14, 1977. As none were offered, IT WAS MOVED BY GARRISON,
SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE MINUTES BE APPROVED AS WRITTEN.
MOTION CARRIED.
4. OLD BUSINESS: •
COUNCIL REFERRAL:
PETITION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA, .PAR-
. TICULARLY .THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE
VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH.
THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405
ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND
UNDEVELOPED. AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ON THE SOUTH.
Noting continuation from the September 14th. pub'lic hearing, Chair-
man Walker requested a review by the Planning Director.
Mr. Ericksen noted receipt. of additional information since the
previous public hearing--a legal memorandum and ,copy of a court
case from the attorney representing the Renton Hill Community
Association; a letter from Kathy Keolker, Chairperson, Renton
Hill Community Association; a letter from Mrs. E. Edna Costner.,
439 Renton Avenue South, Renton, requesting consideration.of low'
density multi-family use on a particular parcel of property which
•
4r lo
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
October 12, 1977
Page Two
lies between Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South. He
referred the Commission to a memorandum from the Assistant
City Attorney reviewing the matter of area-wide zoning, as
requested by the Comprehensive Planning Committee. Mr. Ericksen
indicated that all input had been reviewed by the Comprehensive
Planning Committee; the area had been visited by Committee
members; and the Committee has considered the Land Use Plan, the
Community Facilities Plan, and the Arterial Street Plan for the
study area. Maps of the area relating to the existing and pro-
posed Comprehensive Plan, proposed Community Facilities Plan,
and existing Arterial Street Plan were displayed and discussed.
The Chairman requested comments from the Commission members.
Noting none, she called for the Comprehensive Planning Committee '
report.
Commissioner Teegarden, Chairman of the Comprehensive Planning
Committee, noted that the Committee had met with representatives
from the Renton Hill Community Association and Gene Farrell ,
developer, and on three occasions had visited the study area.
After study and deliberation, the Committee submits its recom-
mendation dated October 12, 1977. Mr. Teegarden then read the
committee report in its entirety (copy attached) . It was noted
that the report primarily concerns that area of Renton Hill north
of the Puget Sound Power and Light powerline right-of-way to its
south, west to FAI-405, and east to the greenbelt area. Mr.
Teegarden also noted that Mrs. Costner' s property had been field
checked and that it was their opinion that subdivision into
three single family residence lots would be more desirable for
Mrs. Costner and the community than low density multiple family
development. He then discussed the Committee's plans for further
study of the expanded area to the south and the possibility of
reviewing the zoning on Renton Hill .
Discussion among the Commissioners ensued relative to the question
of zoning in the area and the appropriateness of its review.
Noting current consideration of only the Comprehensive Plan in the
area, as described in the Comprehensive Planning Committee's
report, the Chairman invited audience comment.
Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, representing the
Renton Hill Community Association, thanked the members of the
Comprehensive Planning Committee for their in-depth study and
expressed appreciation regarding the task of the Commission and
their opportunity to participate in their review. Mrs. Koelker
stated that the Renton Hill Association concurs with the recom-
mendations.
Gene Farrell , 11112 Rainier Avenue and 280 Hardie S.W. , Renton,
stated that they also enjoyed their association with the Commit-
tee, although they are disturbed by the recommendation. Mr.
Farrell discussed the property presently designated multi-family
residential along the western edge of Renton Hill owned by the
Transamerica Company. He also discussed the multi-family desig-
nated area in the expanded area to the south and its relationship
to the single family residential area on Renton Hill . He ques-
tioned the Committee's recommendation with regard to access,
noting the need for fire protection and potential single family
development to the east. He suggested that Cedar Avenue South
be reserved for traffic purposes and that parking be restricted..
The matters of multi-family construction over old coal mines,
drainage, greenbelts, and topography were discussed. Mr. Farrell
noted economic benefits as the result of multi-family development
and inquired regarding possible compensation should the multi-
family designated property be reduced to a lesser density.
Robert McBeth, 505E South Third Street and 1632 Lincoln Court S.E. ,
Renton, noted that part of Mr. Farrell 's comments related to the
•
1
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
October 12, 1977
Page Three
zoning in the area rather than the Comprehensive Plan. He indi-
cated concurrence in the recommendation of the Committee, noting
the following factors as justification: the amount of traffic,
limited access, safety and character of the neighborhood. He
stated that they feel the Comprehensive Plan change is both
desirable and necessary, and they hope the Commission will
support it.
Patricia Parks, 118 No. 40th, Seattle, attorney for Transamerica
Development Corporation, described multi-family zoned property
owned by Transamerica which is affected by the Committee's recom-
mendation and discussed the history of its ownership. She indi-
cated that the City' s Comprehensive Plan had been reviewed during
the period of Transamerica' s ownership, and there had been no
recommendation for change until the present time. She asked that
the Comprehensive Plan reflect the interests of her client as well
as other property owners in the area and indicated that the pro-
posed change should be reasonable, unarbitrary, and fair. She
then cited potential loss to Transamerica should the Plan be
changed and noted possible legal action.
Commissioner, Teegarden noted that while the Comprehensive Plan
has been revised in some instances in various parts of the City
since 1965, he doesn't recall that the subject area was con-
sidered during that period.
The Chairman called for further comments.
• Mr. McBeth offered examples of court cases relating to what he
considers similar situations to that being reviewed in which it
was noted that the City has the right to change a designation
regarding certain property, if it feels it appropriate, as long
as the owner has not applied for a building permit. He dis-
cussed the factors that he felt should be considered by the Plan-
ning Commission in making its decision and again asked for appro-
val of the Committee' s recommendation.
Ms. Parks requested that the decision be delayed to allow her
further time to review the Comprehensive Planning Committee's
report and other issues.
Mr. Farrell noted that property adjacent to a freeway should 'be
considered in a unique manner, particularly if it' s sizable.
Mrs. Koelker noted that the matter had been under consideration
for some time and indicated that it was her opinion that an
extended public hearing is not warrented.
David L. DeVore, 6928 South 120th Place, Renton, stated that the
Committee study covered a large area, and yet attention was focused
in the vicinity of Cedar Avenue South. He indicated that this
could be considered, discriminatory in his view.
Oliver Gotte, 810 Grant Avenue South, Renton, noted that parking
on the street was necessary due to inadequacy of the alleys.
James Breda, 1002 Grant Avenue South, Renton, noted the signifi-
cant amount of renovation occurring in the community.
Louis Traverso, 519 Cedar Avenue South, stated that the residents
want to maintain their quiet, safe community.
Noting no further public input, the Chairman inquired regarding
the wish of the Commission. IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED.
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
October 12, 1977
Page Four
Discussion regarding the appropriateness of closing the public
hearing followed, and it was noted that the Commission will be
making its recommendation to the City Council for final decision.
On the question, MOTION CARRIED.
Discussion followed, and IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GARRISON, THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION CONCUR IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT,
AND FORWARD IT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION.
Discussion among the Commissioners followed with regard to the
area involved, the prospect of further review of the expanded
area south of Renton Hill , and the status of building permits
in the affected area.
On the question, MOTION CARRIED.
The Chairman recognized Commissioner Teegarden, who moved as
follows:
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE COMMISSION ADVERTISE
AND HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 9, 1977, TO CONSIDER THE COM-
PREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA SOUTH OF THE PUGET SOUND POWER AND
LIGHT COMPANY TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PUGET DRIVE AND ALSO
THE AREA EAST OF RENTON HILL TO THE GENERAL AREA OF THE GREENBELT
AND TO CONSIDER THE REZONE REQUEST AS FORWARDED TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THAT BROADER AREA, INCLUDING
THE RENTON HILL AREA.
Discussion followed relative to the scope and magnitude of the
proposed review and the appropriateness of considering both the
Comprehensive Plan and the zoning.
On the question, a roll call vote was requested with the following
results:
GAIN - NO
GARRISON - NO
�((!% GIST - YES
MOLA - YES
SCHELLERT - YES
TEEGARDEN - YES
MOTION CARRIED.
Further discussion ensued with regard to the vote cast concerning
the earlier action to accept the Comprehensive Planning Committee's
report for reference to the City Council . IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THAT THE COMMISSION TAKE A
ROLL CALL VOTE ON THE MATTER OF ACCEPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
COMMWTTEE'S REPORT ON THE RENTON HILL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSIDERA-
TION AND ADVISE THE COUNCIL OF THE RESULTS. MOTION CARRIED.
A roll call reaffirming the vote taken earlier regarding the accept-
ance of the Comprehensive Planning Committee for recommendation to
the City Council was taken with the following results:
GAIN - YES MOLA - YES
GARRISON - YES SCHELLERT - NO
GIST - NO TEEGARDEN - YES
FOUR YESES, TWO NOES.
Ir 1
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
October 12, 1977
Page Five
A recess was declared by the Chairman at 10:00 p.m. The meeting was
resumed at 10:20 p.m. with all members noted above in attendance.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE: '
A. COMMITTEE REPORTS
The Chairman called for committee reports.
1. ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Commissioner Garrison, Chairman, apprised the Commission
concerning committee progress in their review of the
Zoning Ordinance for possible revision. He also noted
submittal of the proposed revision-to the P-1 zone for
consideration later in the meeting. The next committee
meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m. on October 20th.
2. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE
Commissioner Teegarden, Chairman, noted that their com-
mittee report had been presented earlier in connection
with the review of the Comprehensive Plan in the Renton
Hill area. He also announced that the next committee
meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m. on October 19th.
3. GOALS AND POLICIES COMMITTEE
Commissioner Walker, Chairman, advised the Commission
regarding progress on the proposed goals and policies
and indicated that they hoped to have -a proposal to
present at the November committee-of-the-whole meeting.
4. LIAISON COMMITTEE
Commissioner Walker. advised the Commission that the
Planning and Development. Committee report concerning
the proposed B-2 ordinance was submitted to the City
Council on October 10th, approved, and referred to
the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of ,an
•
ordinance.
•
B. PROPOSED P-1 ZONE AMENDMENT
Commissioner Garrison, Chairman of the Ordinance Development
Committee, referred the Commission to the revised, edition o'f
the proposed amendment to the P-1 ordinance. He discussed.
the Committee' s approach to the problem, requested ,that the
Commissioners, study' the draft further, and •submit their
comments and recommendations to the Ordinance Development
Committeee in order that they may be incorporated into
another .draft to be considered at the November 9th meeting.
C. OTHER '
The forthcoming Planning Association of Washington Fall Con-
ference was discussed.. . Parliamentary procedure, as it applied.
to a particular circumstance, was reviewed.
•
As there 'was, no further business before the Commission, IT WAS MOVED BY
GIST, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE MEETING 'BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED.
The me- ng was adjourned at 10:45 p.m.
•
ar-4/
San r a Gist, 5296;;;L
Joan Walker, Chairman
4
October 5 , 1977
Mr. Clark Teegarden, Chairman
Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Committee
Renton Planning Comlttission
Renton Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055 •
•
RE: Comprehensive Land-Use Plan--Renton Hill
Dear Mr. Teegarden :
• We appreciate the opp,ortunity;..y..o.u., have ;given to us
to participate in your deliberations as you attempt to resolve
the conflicting demands now being made upon you regarding
proposed changes to the City of Renton Comprehensive Land-
Use Plan. We hope that our input has been helpful to you
in reaching a decision in this matter.
As you put together your recommendations to the •
Renton Planning Commission , we sincerely hope that you and
members of your. committee will keep our concerns and fears
in mind. The Renton Hill Community Association has again
reviewed the existing Comprehensive Land-Use Plan for the
City of Renton and would now suggest that the Comprehensive.
Land-Use Plan be changed as follows :
1. That the geopraphic area making up Renton Hill be
reclassified and designated, as single family residential.
We simply do not feel that the development of multi-
family housing is compatible with the existing
development of single family residences on Renton Hill .
•
2 . We would ask that all existing streets on Renton
Hill be permanently designated as "dead-end--no thrU"
streets . We see no justification for extending any of
the existing streets to accept additional traffic
though Renton IIill. The existing streets are
presently inadequate to handle existing traffic and
there is no way to widen or improve the existing
streets to handle the increased' traffic •volume that
would he generated by multi-family development.
• 3. 'We suggest that the area located directly south of
Renton Hill be reclassified as medium density multi-
family. In this regard, we suggest that an arterial
street plan be developed to circulate traffic onto
Benson Road or Grant Avenue/Puget Drive rather than
funneling that traffic onto Renton Hill.
• JO
4 . We request that the area presently zoned as H-1 on
the Northeasterly 'portion of Renton Hill be designated
as greenbelt or single family residence. We are concerned
that the development of property to the south of this area
might create a situation in which increased traffic would
be permitted. to flow through Renton HIll . We therefore
. suggest that the area involved be designeated as greenbelt
and that the greenbelt be extended to the school property
located on the extreme southeasterly edge of Renton Hill.
We would likewise ask that no through streets be permitted
onto Renton Hill from any of the property located near the
pipeline right-of-way.
We thank you for the opportunity to make our feelings and
recommendations known to you and sincerely 'hope- that 'these
concerns will be included in your committee' s recommendations.
•
Respectfully submitted, •
Kathy Keolker, Chairperson
Renton Hill Community Association
(.. 1 Ali 4"// .. 0 '''il ,
/ /?7/ ee //I;A 6;;-,,,,,,u,/,/ , A47s-- 1411.ti fr/#AD/e" i,Pczer-/-/5
•
G 1/'?'-Zrr // /- e/,-,
( /."\=7-ee, /,2), ,er,i," l`hl�l" eyeh/ mor/T�1'/.Uh:' os'?
/ .zic 7C2 6f/2 i eT 1'1/ ipid/h �P- .,62/7// dvei s
Cdh sd�' - � / � ��'�
/� j? fi 7 S-/; eaXie/4 -/ I CGh s�
cSG�.r�"!) 0 r ��sl`�
./.7,271// . /-fc' im-.3e as- f/rer- .i .ce5-5- ein k
pi--.. ,r/e,W am-? / e (,)- iiA ,
.(.
,?,C iReo„,v,17e1,1 #di e/r/r7E dedoi-e/W. i-A--ee7C5- rei9gair,
ds C // a rr>Q e'/A D prearg4/ apsoier-S
ir) . ;/k e.Q.ft-eyei,i/r. .2o)i.ecj / reyie-riz- /kr' l
e f?w e tie sw.h,
�� � ���r/� �6 ��e Leh, ��/� ,
03.�, Le «�� &' /A y y
e �ckck7 1 pC' / 9 4 cG%s/dF.c r�,z(42) .reig e 5-1-5 o�1
` Z.7 ,hi,/dim / aw9m4,04 %-gxt
6', Az----jedp<v77e4,c./ jez Ic;i4PY,97' e/2 /27e.5-- 04 I A e c.:;)7,
R412 .
( 4 (%al,2 42 d h f ka‘2/).57;4/ /221-/17`0- thl, AfrA
at 0F/ ,-/re /ecili j
d9 De/e°' / W a4112,577 de.S7 J44'1/69. a/`rj
PS7 �/de v 7 (We /' dYe:
el/23/ / 42/7,i,P 4.
• ( c) (- )a i ?e, p-,e(27-
LA - ohs
0,,i/xot a, 42?" S/7//0'� blip CI eft /-�- �'..: 57
�) � sir r/
�IPI /4 PX7/ 97 D. /0 /4 /
�, d s/e, . ,..f' lk '
j ca
, nter 4 e/
6, 6i--yer)
LG v /
*.., � w o7
- "gm,.
____._ ..�-•-ter
OfreA /31.0,70
S/ ve,/c/o / ..wdq cidez/a
S/ C/L y 7/ 1-f / / cac/
7/7/ 7/P �
SP?-10 �i//cif /4itfcz/
c,e 6z7/7‘.7 ,2 g ./6 ecV
d/( e ul2./ l6( r' X,v) r�� S5 22 A7/c4/
r I
.,
Gov Rem
A
8 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RE `- TGTON,
�� ti 'COST OFFICE BOX 620. :00 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • R$NTON,WASHI. /7Y7?, ' L1 I`�
/3 (o z7•Pet /j�
O,p °�Q` GERARD 11.SHELLAN.CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J. A REN. AsslsTAxrcrry Arr RN:x
gTfbSEP1E. October 4, 1977 Cis S _
,
-- �c"
•e ✓"��
TO: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director l,4 ��. -/
'SvtlE_E5r;;;;;. .
FROM: . Lawrence J . Warren, Assistant City Attorney
•
Re: City Council Referral - Renton Hill Petition
Review of Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
bear Gordon:
This Memorandum is in response' to your Memorandum of September
28., 1977 addressed to Mr. Sheilah. Since you posed your questions
in numerical order, my answers will be in the same order.
1 . "Area-wide zoning" is not defined in the Ordi nafices
as you mentioned . However, the intent of the legislation would
make it apparent that the Council meant that the Planning Commission
should not be giving recommendations on individual rezone applica-
tions, but should be dealing with a grater area of land which
might be defined as a definite, discrete area of land defined by
• natural) geographical or political boundaries , including more than
one ownership.
2 . Yes
3 . Yes '
•
• L . If the Commission believes it could deal with both
• comprehensive plan questions and the zoning questions at the
same public hearing,' then there is nothing in the Ordinance system
that would militate against that arrangement . However, that would
appear to be . a policy decision to be made by the. Commission itself .
5 . In answering question 1 above , and referring to section
2-207 (B) , it would appear that the Planning Commission could make
its rec.ommendatio to the Council on the matter of zoning : However ,
am not sure that the study on the Comprehensive. Plan would be
entirely relevant to the' question of a zoning change . Of course ,
some of the elements will be the same but the Commission should
remember that the Comprehensive Plan is a long range planning
device , while zoning is much more of an absolute action.
hope this Memo answers the
questions that you have posed , but
should you require further information , alease feel free to contact
me .
,--------7- Y/ -
.- (--,.., %.-_ ,,(.c.,, ,,, - (-..A-,-,c.,__
Laurence J . Warren
•
of RP
r• 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
Co 7.
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE SO. RENTON WASH 98055
2 al 8
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0
42
• 235 2550
4
•
0 ci14,
cosEpi September 28, 1977
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney
FROM: Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL PETITION ,
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING
The above noted matter was referred to the Planning. Commission
and Land Use Hearing Examiner forreview and recommendation .
The matter is presently under study by the Comprehensive Plan-
ning Committee (note attached referral and petition) .
The, committee has requested that I contact you in writing to
clarify the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission under the
new Planning Commission ordinance , as it relates to the zoning
question .
Section 2-207(6) states that the Planning Commission may make
recommendations to the Council on area-wide zonings . Due to
the lack of, a definition of area-wide zoning, the committee
chairman has requested :
( 1 ) Your review and definition of "area-wide zoning. "
( 2 ) Could the Renton Hill area be considered of sufficient
size for area-wide zoning recommendations?
( 3 ) Could the Planning Commission at this time review the
zoning of Renton Hill in view of the Council referral ?
(4 ) Could the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing
on the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning question
together or at the same public hearing, as separate
items on the agenda? •
( 5 ) Would it be appropriate for the Planning Commission
to make recommendations to the Council on the matter
Of: zoning as part of the present Comprehensive Plan
study?
Gerard M. Shellan , City Attorney
September 11 , 1977
Page Two
Your review and comments would be appreciated . Please contact
me , if you have any questions . Thank you.
GYE :wr
Attachment
• INTEROFFICE MEMO
Date June 8, 1977
. TO . Planning Dept.
FROM: Del Mead
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Petition to Rezone Cedar Avenue South
Referred by the City Council at its regular meeting
of June 6, to the Planning Commission and Land Use
Hearing Examiner for review and recommendation re-
garding Comprehensive Land Use Plan and zoning for
this area.
DM:bh•
Attach
•
•
I JUN. 9 1977
n ø, •
"?"P-77",:j-- /7649
1 f f�'I� (7T.„2.cx(i i y�?" /?zz
4, 2--2- r (w- -x-47 r -9/7
If 9/ rD' V Lang .
}77 "722� g .
71?-7C/fr. 6- -1?-1 9'‘f 71414W 4/7 7V4
"Lazp:V 4201117M-Vc, .?—r772-7- 7:;$ 1:7-17-rsrVirrir
1117Z r/72-7 .
s/Xp9 4iw 77071'77 17,i74
�r77/7 ',V,L1 7' 2
h9- chyp_A-7 Q "?-7-2?-rey- r 147.74-0
or-7/7. #76/7-9 CPI- r 9/ r77P, / .471V 710-9,
25/3017/ 2/23 777- am9 Vrirerd Sg/ $ , �/ r _ '`'`a�
r,z-<e )?-/-02/ 'Y.T. fr'2'.' 6v inl.r
OUINNfr c'
//-4
/)
6?› 0.4
\\ra \.\:6‘,°"6
\/fr1 N3��
c
;2,2- ?Ii•t-r-vr2 -22 ci/ 447713 wv
r jet-
WA7 ii743-4-)-97 ) ?y
re40 ' z ) 22(71 r )7????
Y-1149? 727,0 P- *
??1," 7z77/2 )77l,17z3 7117 ov
xff2.4_,-74,,x7v*r e -nynder(4,1-10-2- /7,7T pl--viv
/77
4--frept( 7Wa " "?7,-7,r qt 1
nAi)-7.-2,-ry)-710 1127/42 ,71,or 7/1A-1,)123 •
4144-00 1-74-)-771v ?,yrvt.11-
17111-0D 77-rri q9 Ix 9v/
,ekt-z7W417 tpff7 p7 '72--rp 12,p/
137/ 1,2:2.727,r ..rr -14,as ?-7.11-47/
) c7 "r271 /Er: 101414'r 14e a-rli-ay 1-1-(1 ray-
• lont-747/0 v-z-vt7i7 )7.(g
hz772- - 77L Jobgr 71-/ iog 47, , 727217 707/ t2/
11?' 4--41-1-17-19:2r77 1,72,,,%r2 7/V:1N
17 ;ic• 1-1°11 ' 7/Lg -17X1
VOrir ?-1/9 .?/-779727 2 - -r-vnilt ?-74-1
*7v ??..77,127----o- 7/v p,p• p-3--72:244,vo,'?
cr -
ci'At ice . i "eci'i(m77) /l r t
64.1 Ar2 Atazeiii, .e;pc, eo ieee/le( 660,tec-ic
Aie.a.f "i? f,265edediceA .--CletZifl
MiL4i / 5.7 b J I4& & a* A �
ei a2 &tad to
4a_zi _c1/4/L 746,)-,z_?
a) &J ye . S
h 5///'.a-ta
cic'd itc-t 4f)a,frii
w
did 42arne
cG
, c6=e-A
6e.,Lkt,
/e9_ MA-carial, kra
y6.“..z/ C�� Zat' dap
/ J
Ct.. PCB c
`yl :4 1, .;/u f �.2Lzc. / � (— .LL-'( l't'd SIG fit.
p).0,vil ?-2 14 y ic7 "!/
.,may yy
1, 2 ate" 7 ati.. __ .?-zt7..p�-�- - o-rf ,3u? (� rc ,
Y//: qr3
1A.0 "V ?-21,79y-0,E)
4190 -b 4'
a�
y72' 12 ' L 27p v X?rh1r -
---)-P-M-17 7 (kr 14' ) 2 4-/A-0/-7-7/-)
-- 11,417// V72111 /7"21 1110,9 477/1r_
P./-7% 'Yt-7,7,177 y074e27/ /W- r"P7-.7 L'/X-gy
r1
ct-y-44/
-77-f 1-v -avv3 Afte4 pte r7 74-12 )7724-2-iy
4-77-ahlr
g- )4, ?w-A-27 r
ig7 F..?2 "7 74.„7-jcz;.!
Arci-y27e,
/7 --__
22 6 'Y9(27 / 424u--ea
vt°270<
)- -11Y1` / f2
4777 /-7-ez( 17)7v
p9 6.72-Pt-Vriot—d—z.49 -74?" 73,k
1
0,7- 144/0 (19
7 '77 Fr'17-77-7 Yt 4X 712-r21
•
J •
P -u' BLIC NO IuE
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY- OF RENTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON
SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
DESCRIBED BELOW:
•
towPURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH, THE RENTON HILL AREA
• IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON .THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE
EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT—OF—WAY ON THE SOUTH.
..}.4,,!..%r.,,i_i_ti g.palr: •-.4 . ,F 4,,,.- 14-- --.4. - ---- ,
. 1 l'''''''': '•,. _1 r.;'.':,!If-I '4 V,,q f;".i4!'r' '' ' Tilt_1-i; 7 __
i f is u�'. r 14 ir_ ii n ` J L.. ;ls "a.-13 41 G�e'; is i y t. `','/to*II ''''-77 1. "__ \ ` \
2 ����4���1„ f dR ��' �I';31� 3I.' #-"I it F� l-..:,[_��a ,,-.�
'Pi : aa= lii 7i, lek 1"..c.;f l:_�--. ' !III } :. _ +T; .4',N 'J -_ '—
4,...,..: 1. !!ii I...:: :f' IT.„ 7 . ,
•
,.:,.,t,.....___,
,i.
•
; .; A IF 1. , —. � i l, _at- - 1- _-,: J . � ry -__-_ ___
i ,o, ,� I I Hi",... �l ��
' 0 ,Z L .,... i.: r
' r,J • �-1 / •/7/ a ,. >1•
' ‘ -
�/.• 12!Mr '. ."' . ., ..
•
I ... , oNN�
, „ ,____. _
„--.,.--___._._._ ,
....r...!. ."„.„1, " ..
-_..1 , 1- ________________
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO. ATTEND AND .TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT
COMMENTS IN WRITING.
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT:
CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550
• MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. .
RENTON, WA. 98055 - f,.',
1.1
Q ' II joy Qt . 7
•
.__. .. _ .1 ;,,Ljoitiorw, ores ' =- "7-4,......:".../
It)
-, ._ - .. ..
A ......,1„01„.....„,...90, (,,
. ... .. .
. _ _ .
_ .
mr........ ....fters• ...)
tr, ..-ierai 1,0 0 11'1 - 5 "4—; /-1, 6 27) .,
_ . _ . . ._ .. . , . _ . . .
. (wiz)
_ . . _.. . ___ ....
. ____.__ _ .
_ _.._. . . . . .
, .
. . , .. .. .. ..
,....60?„
0077---)-2- .)... , . ........
. .
. .
. , .
. .
, . ._ .
_ , _....._
\ (74 . . .
...
. •
1 •
s..
. c9 r/ —\ . _ .. . ..
. . • ,, ,........."„ord
...-...
r
..,., . .. . Aplev..276a, )94.,1r7,
j '' ...27/' !.. Vah.ill 1
WYI _
1 b 1 W ,
,
ii,,4771 / C-. c a. -,.-e.,:.4 ,:-- ,,,epAo
C fr , #0 -K i, . .
----
//2::- . .. ' •
. . .
. .
. .
. ,
. . .
.. ,
de . . .• .
.. ,
.. __
. eg-g•-•.4-4P-c7.
. .
. . ,---0.--c-e-ov--• ,,e-e.---e÷g"4---..a.--4.-e( . __._ •__ . •
.,-
_
. ,
. , .
. .
. .
. .
4 .C'e . ,
. ,,,---3-7-&-
• . - 0-4-e•-eArtive
, __ ........._.__
. .
. . .
, . . . .
. . .
. .
__
. ,
. .,
..-
56-4.-. 44--14."-' .. _ . __ ....________._________.
. . ...„._ .
. .
....,... .,. _. . r
. ,
. .
. .. .
._ ....__ _
.. .
. ,
. . .... .,... ..
... .._. _...._ . . . . ..
*.
,4.4./ .
. _ _ .
-......... . ....
. .
_ .,,..6...4..., — .
"fr.et.4,4
.. ..... .. ... .. kirr Ag...,.... . ....________ -
. .
. . , .
. . . . ...... ..„ . . ..
.. . .._ .. . .
. .
.. .
. .
. . .
. . .
._. ._.. _. ._.. . . .., . _
. .. ......... ... . . . .
-. ., r ,,,.:•:,
. . . . . ..... . ...... ....... _ .. ... _ _ .
. . .
. .
. . .. . ... ..•_•• • • . . . . . ..... _..... ... ..... ....... ,_____ .
. .
. . ... .. _. .. _ ..... ......... .._.,_ ..... .... .
.. .
. . ,
. .
, .
. . .. . . . . . . . . .. .......„_._. . .. . . .
. ..
_ . . . . _ - • • •-- - „____ .• . .
. .
. . . . .. , .. . . • .
.. .._._ .
. .
. .
. .
. . „ .. . . .... , . .. . .
.. . . . .
. . , . .
. .
. . . . .. . . .. ,... ..._..._ ..
. . .
. .
.. . . . .. .. .. . .,... .... .
. . .
. ......' . . .. .. , . ..... .. . . ..
.. .
. .
. .A .
. . .. . •• ... .. . . . . .
. • . .
. •
. .
•
..__....._ . ... . ... . . .
. , ..
... _. ..... _........ . .:._ .. __. ._.. . ...._ ,
. .
....... . ... .... . _ . . ... ....._... ... ....... .. ...„ _ ..
. .
• . •.
. .
_ •_.
. . .
. .
. .. .
. , .
...
. . .
. . , .
, .. . .
. • ,..
. ,
.... . .
. . .
. . . •,,
A) + 3° .
...L_______„RH
Coin , , 00#/i_47 ' C.c.) .gi_eil. ,/,/e4
1
____ /1 _.A._010(0, 0 .. /9 C(0.--e, s S, . /4„/
—II Xedlei,L" .
55ei t ado . ,255-0 93:k
e45ET o 5-453 f •Ord Yr- 255-SZab:
I c2 a I .1. afieleV.-- . .
Mk/44A/ l' /1 -''' ..
e:.7 d7.5-
I� ! / ,.. z1.44_444.4.4,4)tjp$4,- . fir"- • -
s-0_1_0_41.get..(444. -g .= 4--r- g 6 vp,1 'y . '
-- -- _ .. . _
. .
. I, .
.
if
L,
•
•
•
II
_4-- _ ______._ __ ______ ._ -___-- .. _- .. .
I, .
II
ter:
i
•
•
•
•
•
„- ,_./
..... yr , .i. �• �. / _ / l..y r 4 / ./ /. ? it) .. ',7
i (:�/ "77 f.) Y
sZ Q
coAl-r *
• / 0 ;
CeATOP,Olo e /2 /7 7
le*7'19 /Va.° 4ee;7-'—`7"'
IC1T1 OEeeeN-roo ki6-1-t-rs OF
igENION HILL STgEET-5
MILL Coo FEET-
CEPA12- go FEET
RENI on) go FEET TO 71- 6o FEET -7-7-11 loni
Geft or. 4/0 FEEt ,TO 711 (oo FEET • .
( 67 14 go FEEt- • .60 Fe ET-- Tb.' loTH
_TONES 30 FEET
3V:5 oOFEEY
• TH (,OFEET
(00'. tAndeuRlopect. due to rad-e_,
. T qd .
Goo FEET
60 FEE-1-
/0 TH 30 FEET
11 T. 30 FEET pir.171ED 2\o`k,,,
• • /0- \
!aP Z3 1917 •
goLicolu ulliv koFfET
•.( s
\.?.Z!YDti'e.1:2;
• CCI)filL MEH5u1LEMENT: 3 •
•
LID5EET LOT LiNE. TO. Lot irE
• • .S1pEwALie- z V64 141\.) 1) 1,9•1
AcTunt_. .5-reec -T- wth -r- H .261 Q.
.. V ; .11-uEr06-E cile_ 15 6 — 1 FEET w roe-
, DisTriocE 8e-TwEeoTwp soffeKEb Cr1123 WITH
01-IEEL5 11-6-11w5 -r cui.e6 13. 1
, •
. „
/ - ' ' • '. '
\ -
• r , -( --',/;•
•
/
g' . n4-?7"--.)-7/...- .' • ,:'
. .
.....,- ..4,- ..- ..... 0
NO,l ' \.• ' . . . .
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON . .,
2 • .-.jr. , 8
2: POST OFFICE BOX 828. 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING 9 RENTON,WASHINGTON 99065 2S5•8078
••0
0 q- GERARD M.SHELLAN.CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN. AsszsrANT CITY ATTORNEY
43 • 4.,
42-,_
‘Li SE P.1-0 ' September 21, 1977
..
. . .
. .
. .
. ., .
. . .
'• .
. .
. . .. .
• . .
:irs . Delores read • .
• '
City Clerk % •• .
City Hall
• . •
• . . .
Renton , WA 98055 . , .• . '• ' . ,
. . •
• . .
. . Re': Renton Hill. moratorium resolutionl ': ,_
. .
. .
Dear Del : ' • . . . ' . •
. . ,
. .. . , .
We have prepared and are enclosing herewith original and one
copy of a Resolution for a certain moratorium on construction
in the Renton Hill area. Although we do not have too. many
details on this matter , we believe that the grounds spedified - ' . •,•, ,',.—-
in the resolution are sufficient to support ,suCh a moratorium. -':
.
. , (
, . Would you please have the Public. Wbrks Director Verify the '. ,• , '.,' ,,,.: ;':, ,
, .
description to be sure ' it 'covers the proper area.•
, • . • . „ , , „ .
We remain , .
• . . .
. . .
• , ..Yours very truly ,' ' •
. ,
. .. .
. , • :-.'.., cli....., ,,'," .' ,, '?.•,i . f',-',:• '-;'•
. ' • . . , .
. .
' Gerard DJ. Shellan
' .
. •
' ', , .:,.,,'',„' • '„'; .±'''%':':.),-!!'•',-.
GNS :ds . • . • . ,
• •, . .. .
' Enc.. • • •
,••••" . • ,; - •'. '.,'!",,,,, y,;:;;;;i„',-,,',".•'•. .
cc : l'embers of Council. . ,
, ' • •.
Mayor . . . .
. . .
, • , '.
Public Works Director • . .
. . .
Planning Director • .
Secretary , Planning Commission - , • ,' , : • ' • •''' ';'''-,,...-•;:.',••,:f.•4;,,,,;)i.;',-i,', ,
.,...,-;,•-•_•.--- r'• •.'.:•,-,•••:," •••-ii ••• ;•,,Y'' ',. .',:- i •:•,,, •
. .
• /...‘ -t ....,. ,. .
rl... ' p...: .Ti:D .:.:'(-::, rp !I ii,. ''.. „..•:: ".-:.'.,'::-:,':2U:.,:'X',.!:: ::
. . . , .
. .
• . • . • ii(- -
. .
. . .
. . ,
. . .
• • . ki -JD 23 1.1 .'7): ,:::0:.. .;:..0. 0 ..,',,
. . , .
. ,
'-. ....,.• : ,:.y-.;.•.''.. :,,,,,:,i,:,,,•
- ,
'' ....,-,:',!4.,4,.,.,":'• •
<,.,-,:,-,, . ,.,:•::!.,.:,,,,•,,;iy,.. . .
. .
4.
mm. -.. D v'p' I\C's.„/ ' .', ..'!,•',',', .:,,),: ..,r‘!
' .
1 wip
Y . ., . ....„ ,,,..
.. . .„. . . .. .,. ,..,y„.„,
4 „ ,- :•'.. ,r,'4,,r,'''. l':,, '
. .
, .
. .
14..
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2137
i WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Renton , together
with its committees, has been and is now studying and reviewing proposed
amendments to the City' s Comprehensive Plan within certain areas of
the City , and
WHEREAS such study and review also includes an area in the City
generally known as"Renton Hill" , as hereinafter more particularly
described, and
WHEREAS it has been determined, on a preliminary basis , that
serious problems may result in said area if unlimited construction
were permitted for any multiple dwelling:. , commercial or industrial
purposes , due to insufficient and inadequate street access , circuity
traffic pattern , means of ingress and egress ,and such existing problems
may seriously affect the public health , safety and well being of the
community , and in particular the residents within the hereinbelow
described area, and
WHEREAS it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City to '
establish a moratorium on certain construction pending completion of
the present studies and reviews , including public hearings thereon,
NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION I : The above statements and recitals are hereby found
to be true and correct in every respect.
SECTION II : In furtherance of the public health , safety and
general welfare , there is hereby declared a moratorium for the
construction, improvement and alteration of any multiple apartment
buildings , commercial and industrial facilities of every type and
nature , for a period of ninety (SO ) days from date hereof , and relating
to the following described territory:
All that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 17 , Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E.
W.M. , lying east of FAI 405 and south of Chicago-St.Paul Milwaukee
and Pacific Railroad. Together with all that portion of the NW 1/4
of Sec. 20 Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E.W.M. , lying East of FAI 405 and
North of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission
line easement.
-1-
•
. g 4
In the event that the study and review of the City' s Comprehensive
Plan and related documents as same affect the abovedescribed area
have not been completed within said ninety day period , then this
moratorium shall be renewed , without further action of the City Council ,
for an additional period of sixty (60 ) days .
The aforespecified moratorium shall not apply to existing apartmn
single family or duplex dwellings or the renovation, repair or
maintenance of same.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26-tiday of Septembe,r2977 .
De ores . erk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th day of September , 1977 .
/,` • -
Charles Delaurenti , Mayor
Approved as to form:
/17
G and M. S elan, City Attorney
•
-2-
411
•
,'_. J — ..�A; v� . ♦ :,,-•- .-4471 =S qv;,i:=4' :A.:l:y.::T' r u Eti=-�L"-r-"'t S -, 6z0 '��
:•\'' �"-' .e_,� .:r... y l,_.! Wit"'- �.
:Z, EV a`. a. �•- . ; _-L' ''I;f }tllS�:t ;q..vL::-7�?"-"��'.:1'tll'. _.;y�,.Y �r -' • ,N . _ -.a i
,l - I,l"tie - }a', • - ci, . l' • ..� ..kYlft...$1.0 �... it7C.,,,A ti t\'.:V:'11i. _ dial'lffl �_~^i i :;-/ •.p' .. _ - -
r. „2.1a1 -Aiit,. _ CAQ,,*, - 4F tL':,
....:11,--, / ,(Z I
•�:di{,L_..-, j'-'-T:►(I-.=��'� rn mo,t�,-._•,._ 1,i._ .--r___�'':,—-�I ,';;�.''-"r_j'o2y ,.__--. _..il e'.e.;e:":r_44-.T.1T rr-amL�.\:`. e`,6�.:A1 - - -.-.. n ' - F .. ) .t
• l� __`\� rih• "'I.:. .4, sP+1..MR:':i M _u -.- "t - r - :P �4:'- ,"!�:_} r . d•1.eHtll ` AV It_/ 1
_
•
-i `cal
'4-
•
•
•
7 : sT .1 m. -` - � ` 1 . :L: : __.-&- r =- - rP? . --` i ii•' i I.Ii({d . ::: ate.:a 1- � .7• + i i .^---_ . ..- "y - -� - URNErr ` :,Eoi!tt_; - _ _,`T. ,_: .i -'' •T4[-�pTO- GXT ..- AEV4 ,-.,,z-:,-.^_` ,-:-a-_..,,r..,, . •- ��;�:_rr1 F:CTx�-.: Yn:,11V-wc.-T_j .- BI - / -���:_t_i k. 14.', O �- -- ' .-r hT_ - ---- .. _ -
/� `\ _ t.11;'.., •1;y.V.1. •radii F.•+tl,+ ' - d ::,. 2 E :.@3:B ti ,.s _ BU41JE•f
:. L..� \—;�.. +./L"y,A�.41_�.s ��.: �1.�J\/C1 PJ` �EP�_t., 2i -j• ;�tEk-4(.�C{
•
rcq
-t _ 9 1 j - l -_ • i. :.,. i.'cr1 ,..c^."4c�cs s , l;pI
'„ 1 �` i� ry� J 1.
�'�+ V i 'i9. .. ,_ �_:ek:t '.._.�,. _�"- tA .s- -m---`•_ Y t.. / i 1 Z/ �' T
g ..Ty. _ . / fj.„„"r. t �;-1. - �1- 2r jlk' _ Vd,.wi.ihl'
.=..E1iL..-:•L- ,1. // > .� - w/[t IAMS
_N/EL t 3 ;.. .1v,Gr..+.^ 1 e _ /`'.jC-ai �.._.i fimE
\ .._ 1 K • '^ •
' bR
'' �74-4 r Y `ir;-- -T,0-LEmEYT - � -'';fi41+»1+ ' r,=i.T. r—
M c a•
1
•
- ._ -- -_. - - --- - - t,' ITLi.QI • tom';
4) - .K... - _ Y _YY1'.�J-`_f�'L��'l.r lYl!!L"itlk'•r{�Is)'-, '
s
l". .� r7$;FJ?G rltl. _:C'�a'1i7' cGY
L �c� G' -Ti
ins - ., y�rr - r j f ft..
r F# '��� T �l
•--;'�-.=' - —:,,(. -- 'T.--'--- - -•- - '-'1--- •J.a:.a_:e♦t':��"ii'._?� _^iLF' _ { • ,_ai 1��9 .:ii- r.1•1-r''tit'
- - —-: ..._ ,�.' -- ---• y .. 4- ,c»F;=-Cr�.. +sFl[ j.•�Fi. wed
• - .�. L' c .�: :• . •.11..Si. 1 '`t i 1.}.l' i 1 1
+�. .1, _ . -; . --� �- `l:' - :�! ' • �'"C' �• .ly� I( • •1 ♦ SANTU
.at(Ll '1-er -t.
_-- _- -_ _ t:�3r`" �_`' :� ='Tti—=-' '� �� b � 1 � }-'rr � �_1 SCHOOL
'T-
Li
,•�'/�. _ N�3e�i.l r__..,•�.1,�, •, a:x.-T�L' "p't r,.l�- i_i1.�1i.L'L__'4' _— M M ^
t. ,rt - T III.it.. ' -i:.�'1'[4 i"!:a' `+r? .. r ,`- \. < !7}�Pr'�-
1: I r-�- s - -- t ‘ni 1 i I 1
s _ t Y {�dl� r®s r►ti
_ i L I " �� c�+r1 .i1
u.G�' - 1- .J C_•i a�_�� � .. _ il; ( ( (\ "�i�l F CT.y��V A`.•E: ••,.
. . •'kv ... i_;:ii..4.7-f--_,1 -:!,-
{
( 7.� J
•
�: N
1 \
A
I. ,�'4 _ - - .. / I: rI Y MONT�a E. __
1.
:./ -! CAPR. AvC
/
C i .�.y _/_i_y�, l
L jj:
\
•
.-\,1
T` t
_ L=1 1'
•
75g j - e 2 Z j<or" y °its/ & r/ ..4171/"2.7 �rU
454 -8'tZ _1S .v Sartt2C LIQ lvf'd
t•Ce_. -PC"'fib'VW/V/b1)1 rtig;17 CI) --r-V-7.--
__58G$-Y.L4 '7o/ 0ey -PSG9 71-2
i) '05't ikoorvay .-f s-r-J44,m1
;f1la pj'%z SPS 'al a v tt rg.
os do y✓opao ei5 Ja ll oaN X is iN
LL /2 / . .,� ' of 2 �/
111
MEMORANDUM
TO Gordon DATE 9/16/77
FROM Willis
SUBJECT Renton Hill Comp. Plan Review
Kathy Koelker called to advise that the following
people will probably attend the Comp. Plan. Committee
meeting on Wednesday, 9/21, 7:30 p.m. :
Kathy Koelker - 255-0936
Bob McBeth - 255-5600
Clarence Dullabant - 255-4917
Jim Breda - 226-5242
Martha Wiberg - 255-4220
Ruth Larson - 255-0290
cc: Clark Teegarden •
... -:'yam R'•.
•
•
•
•
OD •
•
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ss.
•
kia rz&X''Q'`t Ha'b a U;h being first duly sworn on
oath,deposes and saysthat.S.�7,fl.isthe Cbief Clerk ' f...`r ,
• of =6! P idon Ptah-
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4)
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and j•., , NI HE OF •
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred PUBLICHEARING •
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- tON LAND USE:
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, EXAMINER
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained • RENTON;:WA^a EARIN
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton A':P,UBL'1G:HEARING
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the WILL: BE.HELD BY THE
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, RENTON.!.LAND USE
• HEARING 'EXAMINER INER AT
Washington.That the annexed is a Notice of P ub l i C HIS REGULAR MEETING
IN;THE COUNCIL CHAM-'
BERS, CITY•.HALL, •RE-
e.B.rT NTON;WASHINGTON,ON
••
SEPTEMBER20, 1977,AT
• 9:00 A.M..TO CONSIDER'
as it was published in regular issues(and THE FOLLOWING PETI=
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period TIONS';.
1:.ROBIN SALANT, RE-
ZONE FROM GS-1 TO '
R.2 to.R-. File No: R-.
of a. consecutive issues,commencing on the 071-7.7;Property bested
on Grant Ave. So. bet-
9 day of September
•
wean South Puget Drive
19.7�....,and ending the and South 18th St•
2.,HILL-ROWS INVEST
•
MENT CO., SITE AP-
day of PROVAL IN .A M-P
inclusive, and'that such newspaper was regularly distributed botho i dates
ZONE,Filerty a on
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee east located on
. eide•of West Valley
Road and north of S.W.
charged•for the foregoing publication is the sum of $2 ..7 43rd St.directly South of
has beenpaid in full at the rate of s which NorthwestHobby and
first ion and per folio of one hundred words for the Toy CO.Co
per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent
insertion.
Legal descriptions of ap-
• plicatione noted above are
Ch
lef Clerk
•
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9 day of
. ....Se.pt.emhe.r.., 19....77
-1 i' ,...� jib
` 4 ' �t
Notary Public in a d for the State of Waship ton, i'`j 1
residing at Kent, King County. I1
r 5..$? `J J. I
—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June , -- �-
9th, 1955. - w
—Western.Union Telegraph Co.,rules for counting wOrds and figures, N / Q��•
adopted by the newspapers of the State. !LN NG DEPi i
o
V.P.C.Form No.87
4r 1,
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING
SEPTEMBER 14, 1977
MINUTES
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Thomas Buckingham, Brian Gain, Logan Garrison,
Sandra Gist, Anthone Mola, Barbara Schellert, Clark Teegarden, Joan Walker.
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
PRESS: Cathy Burke, Record Chronicle.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director; Willis Roberts,
Recording Secretary.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walker at 8:02 p.m. , who
led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
2. INTRODUCTION OF NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONER:
Newly appointed Commissioner, Barbara Schellert, was introduced and
welcomed to the Commission by the Chairman.
3. ROLL CALL was taken by Acting Secretary Mola. All responded
present with the exception of Commissioner Gist, who was expected to
arrive later (arrived at 8:25 p.m. ) .
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was decided to defer approval of the minutes until the next meet-
ing, October 12, 1977.
5. OLD BUSINESS:
4 COUNCIL REFERRAL:
PETITION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE 'RENTON HILL AREA, PAR-
TICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE
VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH.
THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405
ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND
UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ON THE SOUTH.
Noting the petition from residents to review the Comprehensive Plan
in the Renton Hill area, the Chairman requested a review by the
Planning Director.
Mr. Ericksen noted that the matter ha'd been referred to the Planning
Commission by, the City Council . He indicated that the Commission's
area of initial concern is the Comprehensive Plan, although the
referral relates to both the Comprehensive Plan and zoning in the
area. He then pointed out the area under review on the Comprehen-
sive Plan map and discussed the various land use designations that
currently apply.
The Chairman referred the Commission to the original petition from
the community dated June 8, 1977, and another petition dated
August 26, 1977., requesting Comprehensive Plan review, and noted
that the petitions, contained a total of 237 signatures. She then
called for questions from the Commission. As none were offered,
the Chairman invited comments from the audience.
Renton Planning Co ;sion
Public Hearing Mee,....g
September 14, 1977
Page Two
Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, noted she is Chair-
man of the Renton Hill Community Association and stated that the
petitions submitted represented 154 out of 280 households and that
more signatures were forthcoming this evening. She referred the
Commission to the Renton Hill Community Association letter of
September 10, 1977, in which specific concerns and recommendations
were listed, and indicated that they would be discussed more fully
this evening by individual residents chosen by their neighbors.
Mrs. Koelker stated that they oppose multi-family or industrial
development on or in the vicinity of Renton Hill for the following
reasons: it would have severe detrimental impacts; street widths
are not sufficient and have a maximum amount of traffic volume;
access is limited; parking is insufficient; it would affect the
low crime rate; the historical value of Renton Hill should be pre-
served; and the residents wish to maintain the pride of ownership
evident in the community. ' She then introduced the next neighbor-
hood representative, Claude Rogers.
Claude Rogers, 420 Renton Avenue, Renton, discussed traffic condi-
tions, noting the limited width of the streets, limited access, and
potential impact on traffic should multi-family development and/or
another access occur.
Margaret Jernigan, 412 Mill Avenue South, Renton, described the
safety and security of the neighborhood, noting it has the lowest
crime rate in the city. It is the neighborhood's opinion that
this is due to the limited access, and it is requested that the
deadend streets be retained permanently.
Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue South, Renton, indicating that she was
speaking for the children of the community, expressed opposition to
further multi-family development, which could involve the need for
additional school buses and access to the community, thus creating
hazardous conditions for school children waiting for school buses.
Amelia Telbin, 508 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, indicating that she
had lived in the community for 69 years, discussed the history and
development of the community and noted that it had always been a
predominantly single family residential area. She also noted that
many residents are second and third generation families and asked
that the integrity of the neighborhood be preserved.
Jim Breda, 1002 Grant Avenue South, Renton, discussed the unique
character of Renton Hill , noting that while it is an old community,
it is comprised of primarily new and old single family residences
and residents from a wide range of age groups, who are homeowners.
He suggested that other areas of the city would be appropriate for
multi-family development.
Mrs. Koelker, Chairman of the Renton Hill Community Association,
thanked the Commission. for listening to their concerns and intro-
duced their attorney, Robert McBeth, who would discuss possible
solutions.
RobertE. McBeth, 5056 South Third Street, Renton, indicated that it
is his opinion that the Commission can consider zoning because of
the referral from the Council . Mr. McBeth reviewed the problems
caused by further multi-family development--the need for access from
two points to meet ordinance requirements, impact on traffic, impact
on children's safety, and the need to preserve the quality of the
neighborhood. He stated that the community is asking that the
Comprehensive Plan be changed from multi-family designations adjacent
to Cedar Avenue to single family. In addition, they request that
there be no through streets on Renton Hill , that the R-3 zoned area
be changed to single family residential , that the area of R-4 zoning
be changed to a less dense designation, and that the heavy industry
designation and H-1 zoning on the north side of Renton Hill be
changed to single family or greenbelt. He also requested that the
Commission expedite its review so that the character of the community
will not be changed.
Renton Planning Comm ion
Public Hearing Meeting
September 14, 1977
Page Three
.The Chairman noted that the public hearing this evening was adver-
tised as relating to the Comprehensive Plan; and, therefore, con-
sideration is limited to that subject. The Planning Director indi-
cated that the legal aspects of Planning Commission jurisdiction
would be looked into.
Gene Farrell , 11112 Rainier Avenue and 280 Hardie S.W. , Renton,
developer of the condominiums at the south end of Cedar Avenue
South, stated that while he felt Renton Hill had the attributes
of a fine neighborhood, it could use some outside economic help.
He indicated that it was his opinion that forcing people to seek
this type of housing elsewhere would be a form of zoning discrimi-
nation and reminded the Commission that condominiums are a form of
single family ownership. He then described the housing being
offered and displayed a sketch of the type of development being
discussed. Mr. Farrell noted the history of his involvement on
Renton Hill , which includes land ownership since 1969. He dis-
cussed the impact of the development with regard to view obstruc-
tion, the type of purchasers anticipated, the division between
single family residential development and multi-family development
at Cedar Avenue South, preservation of natural areas , and a possible
PUD concept. He noted that the property is properly zoned for the
proposed construction and offered to work with the Planning Com-
mission, City of Renton, and the community regarding its develop-
ment.
Questions by the Commission followed relative to access, location,
size, ownership, characteristics, and current zoning of the property
involved and its relationship to the city core area.
The Chairman called for further questions and comments from the
audience.
Mario Gotti , 105 High Avenue South, Renton, stated that he is still
concerned about the impact of multi-family development on access ,
traffic circulation, and the condition of the streets.
Mary L. Gustine, 910 High Avenue South, Renton, noting that she
sells real estate and is familiar with the condominium development,
indicated her opposition and that of the neighborhood to further
multi-family development on the Hill .
Winfred K. Moore, 539 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, expressed his con-
cern regarding access and undersized street widths in the area and
the potential aggravation of the already congested traffic. He
stated that he had chosen to live on Renton Hill because it is quiet
and wished it to remain that way.
L. W. Wollam, 310 Renton Avenue South, Renton, inquired if an impact
statement had been required concerning the proposed development. The
Planning Director advised that an impact statement may be required
based on plans submitted. However, in this instance Mr. Ericksen
said he is not aware of any plans having been submitted.
Ted Weber, 1502 Beacon Way South, Renton, described hazardous traf-
fic conditions on Renton Avenue South.
Rosemary Grassi , 422 Cedar Avenue South, described her concerns regard-
ing traffic conditions on Cedar and indicated that she would not want
to buy a home across the street from a condominium.
Norm Nelson, 901 Jones Avenue South, Renton, stated that his concern
relates to the possibility of any future multi-family development.
Mr. Farrell responded that plans had not been presented to the City
because he wanted to see the outcome of this review and what to
expect in the way of opposition. He indicated that they desire to
respect the wishes of the community.
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
September 14, 1977
Page Four
Bill Collins, 420 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, suggested that when
any existing apartments on the west side of Cedar Avenue South
reach the condition where they have to be replaced, a provision
be made that the area is reverted to the single family zoning in
the vicinity.
Mr. McBeth discussed further the amenities with regard to the apart-
ments already constructed, the matter of the freeway and topography
forming a natural buffer from the downtown core, the substandard
streets and traffic problems, and the impact of multi-family
development on the neighborhood.
John Giuliani , 1400 South 7th, Renton, asked if the Planning Commis-
sion would actually visit the area and was advised by the Chairman
that they would.
Noting no further audience input, IT WAS MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY
GIST, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED.
Discussion among the Commissioners followed relative to the appro-
priateness of closing the hearing at this time.
On the question, MOTION FAILED.
Ruth Larson asked what protection the community has that the project
cannot be continued, if the public hearing is closed and the matter
referred to committee.
The Chairman requested advice from the Planning Director. Mr. Erick-
sen stated that he would have to consult with the City Attorney
regarding the zoning question, but that there is no question that the
Commission can review the Comprehensive Plan, the arterial plan, and
street patterns in the area. He suggested that the public hearing
be continued to October 12th and the matter be referred to committee
for specific report.
Following a brief discussion, IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE PUBLIC NEARING
REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW IN THE RENTON HILL AREA BE
CONTINUED UNTIL OCTOBER 12, 1977, AND THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED
TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK
AT THAT TIME.
Discussion followed concerning clarification of the Council ' s
referral . It was the consensus that the elements of the Comprehen-
sive Plan should be reviewed, and in the meantime, the legality of
the review of the zoning would be checked.
On the question, MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner Teegarden, Chairman of the Comprehensive, Planning Com- ,
mittee, announced that the committee will meet at 7:30 p.m. on.
September 21, 1977, and invited community representatives and Mr.
Farrell to attend. Mr. Teegarden also asked that. the Planning
Director look. into the question of Planning Commission review of
the zoning in the subject area -and advise the committee.
A recess was declared by the Chairman a.t 10:08 p.m. The meeting was
resumed at 10:30 p.m. with all members noted above in attendance.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
The Chairman referred the Commissioners to a final draft of the
Planning Commission annual report and invited any additions ,
corrections; or revisions.
r__
• -
PUBLIC NOTICE
PUBLIC HEARING
•
CITY. OF RENTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
•
•
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON.
• SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AT 8:00 P.M.. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
DESCRIBED BELOW: .
` PURPOSE: TO REVIEW. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE.RENTON HILL AREA,.,. ,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. .THE RENTON HILL AREA
IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 .ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE
• EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH.
14,kt,i;'','i'•:, !:ii.t..,,i, 1"1,4 I i)::';1',.!2 .4 ,,,,;:`,;:i ..:aillb . -.-' „ '
- t f.1 !I .1 i i I Ir irt:f+i ,i: :,.... -,,..: t. .c4- : 1.— j::. « ! ..-. ."-'N, ,\, , . .
. is.1:1! t'l :.i kJ ; !• I.: ' -:r. ii 'i'i: .. r s'.:.. •,7":•''. i '. .• \ / s'''. .. . '
h •Jnr q41 3 l.o. ! +
r..
�gyp,' i�'i6 a h.� •ri zr } •.., . 1 \
g
i.I. .1,:i 1 10 i 1:'• Itf-,I: :.1 ',_i I: : tli t - .,•''''..\• .- _
. 'i:. 1 ,44 . --"fir I ;''1 111 h' ' ., I w-.-• , • , •it, l• ,,, ; i.,:... •.,. .p i" , ., ,,. 1—.•,. 3,,, ' • I
. `' 1 . ,
•
• • . '- I/ ..', ll . --- LL'i' ' li-..., 1 , - •
. ,: ..';:. ./ .. 7.- -... : - - . • i-.2!.!‘..C -'0-'3'4'4C:'''.
•
• Jji
� I 1
I' - --
_.,—/—,0, ..W,.. ..t 71 F--
THE. PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT
COMMENTS IN WRITING.
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT; '
CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT; 235-2550
MUNICIPAL .BUILDI.NG, 200 MILL AVE. S.
RENTON, WA. 98055
•
- . . (..
• 1 •:••
‘• ;4•.i•' • ...,..... , . . .
. • , .
We the undersigned residents and property owners of .
.- . .
, . .
, .
. ,
Renton Hill wish to express our opposition ' to the building .
., . . .
of any additional multiple dwellings at the upiDer end of
Cedar Avenue South. We also oppose the zoning, planning
. .
.. . . ,
or bu•!.11ding of multiple dwellings or industrial concerns • .
. ,
in any other area of Renton Hill, or any adjacent area that
. • . , .,... .
ml.ght require access or right of way through our community.
. .
. . .
. •
Cur basic reasoning for the above opposition is that
, .
we are concerned about increased traffic, congestion , park- . .
inc pooblems , noise pollution , crime against personal property
and any other difficulties that arise from sudden lane pop- •
ulation Increases within a given community.•
We wish to make this opposition known to any and all
interested parties. •
/,,...`",. tr:.'.! t-1,ir:••\ ' .,,,,,• .,
0,3
i1 Ai jr-, ,r). , .•: ' • ,•,
. • .,,,•I Kt) :.1.9f7''' ' •
\H. ...... .. t;•
• - . • —
.ILLI Name . Address
—
..7. • • --\:;:.,'''//4 ' .0:,,:',..•
• / 7- 7 7 *--(1. -e_'_((.4,..,-(,,,,_5: 23 .,,,,_Zio—,_ - 1 ' . &/,,...2. C-7.73, -:—. 6_,Z.4_4„"'IQ _ ,i'&,:;; ;• : '
l'',7--- 7/7 1i/1-s,',,...,(,-, ,.. —;,.)-<" _./::,---._. . . .,..7-:::,-, _k• _
-z• -1-_i:. - - ' 6Z-Z-e, „ , .' •••,,, -,,,
,/ .r,A in,'
''. /7 .4-4/ 1 / 1
. 74i2..ea.44e..-4.14:2-222.-- .1-1Le.,Prit.41_..1.-44',L.-, / t
2,i 1
1 '.
P
l 1 1..1 4/147 74/1 . ./ at,', h-,?4,•44 6././ .,(?.. - - • . ..
___,.....„..._ ,
....,...„...._...,...... ,
-/7- /7 , : j , .._
,/•:..\ ••,„../- ___....c, ,,,--f•--- 6.,.....treawas 0 / ----.2- ,
.-e,:,—,;,/711 .,.. 6/.----i—e, -,-,:::-/: .. ,
mmeemacnoreateumatr.... ........., .
,ekoswro,aampowmorear....M......-..4.__?.._.6
42:7-\ • ---1 ,. . L ,, t. ( - N .(__s_.,,..,.,_ .7 .,-! ,..,, ,,, . , - ;, . . ,. ...
n (1„, , -, • , ___./
A:f
1 .i --
c ..._ ,
ti' i i ('
----;.:...:;:::.., '41.:..4.-:... .., ' ' ---3) ,,,,_ ,---1.- \LLZAL /
.-:. "1
7") -------
.... ...._....=•_.....4.,:‘,L._cs..____Li., -...-(-,,, 3 b ---c'l t. • le: - i -/ • , , .- . .. A , ., ,... , . .
,,„......„,4„4.%a„,-1.,•:".);.;„..‘,..Z...... .,..,.,-.L.,.. L....j...o . ,/,..G.:-.4„..4.:i...,-;-L...../ -3 3_._:. .-
.......0•140.•••••••...•ra...ty,•
( ..,•".. .,-•
//(6 /3 i L...e. '''' ,, ,• Xi (4...:1‹.271.....e..,fr / . . ,li--. ::?...2 ,!.`:),1_4_,,,,,--- . (:‘1, '''', • ././ • •
1
,/, -11'-.'"j'; " ,',"_ :,./ 5- ?," L.A • ,'; .-c ; -,
IIIPV.....10111011•101V361M.N...W.WIll.M4110111114,064•11Nne ,
• ' ( / 7-'7 -... ... P,f,.
' (
I '- ''' K - i I. ' — \ '-l'.. ' --.)- 1 / ' -''- LI , , ...-.7... 7.,:)--<:•1
''''!./ `7; ; ; .r,‘;.:' -'.-,-..i. :„.. ': 1-1 i ,"'' ;.'' • '''-' 1..-;',;-',
• I ' -.. . , 0 •
' • __ I. . .
_Date:.
. Name Address ..„
—,.....-------------
,
i ,e/
____Z • : i - , • 4
/ /
q(7 c•-- ,..)„, 7,7 - ',„A.,:;:'2
-
--- 1 9
R- )8 . ?7 ..
x,•(..Art..0---.:/// / i,./ ,,..-,..,- „.: 4:_i- 6 cf (' -f'./4A27 ,4ve• Sr. Is?ei//-02._- ,.- • - .
... ,
(c- - /(1) • 2 / 17)0y2//.1',4 4 6-709 i.)</v2i) ..,.:,1 ,4 5C,(_.:LL,L- 2.7 ,-2- --,7 •.____fra....__L,,,,,,.... .4,.. L.,6"4' . , . /.3 I:53 4te'l,a'.. )-.c.•,; &la / L'.,, I
z._ 07 q
)1 1 ;',._ /.-1./.....,, ),.- t;, -.
- --1 4 ...'-'"-- 1 I ....."-l...,;,-L.- -4.A -, - -- --- 7 ----1---
5, 5 C7 eNJ (1, .,) ,.-,,
3- / ,i---- - 7
..,"•-•;--' 1,r.c.-• 4...7 , , ..,_ e...L.--c.--i...-r__•-z..---- .../..Lizi,7.2 ,5- . ..-1,-.-e..e.-?. -c--›••-•‘,, z. ,...e
L.-y -,)ei • '
7 7 LY";:-cz.k. ,,,, ( / ) .5 (') g-1/(- 76 ,• S.' . •
.' ( --)
il)a-1,1_, ty ( , ,L,...-66-1 (-1/ , - ')• ci , C--
6- ),c)
/ 3 ... .
'
-Jo -- 77 ,•- ,--,-- 7, /
/( '--*-- (-A:2'z J.. v.,..,-- } /,. .- ) ‘ 9. _Lj •
2 -_(,- -,g-- -4., ) -.)ar....-7-1.-e.- /--- /cc-%2-- S ,, - '71.'• Z-_,"...71'))--7-_•)'!)-, •
er 9--- 3P-7 1 -,- - (-7' (il,' -z, I ....
A / -
-•-..-- ,.K-e •-c--'ile__,, 4-'.6?-.47.4---,.2--(z.,,' /6",e5/// 7.6,-,e,-/ 1/• /•.-e,,,,,,,)-e)!,, • •
. ,
4f-- 77 ill su -
„, ,,A.„-A.A__p -2,_::e (,..,.4_,...e., ‘/, 0
,.,.....
' .-7 , ..,,,,,-4,:-., ,) - -.) .•)
• , -e, ' 1, - • '.- (,
' d , '' . •
-1/2g7 ,- -,,,,- ---- A / ,/
. .,
/ c: .--.)---2 .1 K,,,' __,..1.---- ,,_,.f.. • ,
(-} -.1.c:.<3 - 4/7 :,'Z''/1 z/7 :A /4.67 -Z-vi /-//(p c-°' 2 ,;/) ..s.
,t- ,....)
-l()' - 77
,
/47/ -: ,5',._ 7 't-A 4-- . ...-:--,2=•.
• ..., . ., . . .
fg.'--)ki 7 ,,:--ii---
7 i 2...s"f"-c-,-...: "t. )a ' 9-2.1- : 6, -- / .___i -: _e), •
-1----,7-_ -
- 7 7 1 7‘...-/--iiL7-12 C:/-/.6-0-7* f-') z-c‘i C: ‘.. /-- 6J___.0 _
c„.„
- /c4: - '77 ,-.., ,-; i(....._„<
i j.!,;44 . ./ttle.:-• . . c ,.-e/Tp-ii„) ,373%e 6:-A77,-,•7- /iLli-E-, 320 t ,
•
- r_.E - • ..-c........,-4,--' ..-'13',2 e:=-R,i,,7-- .4//.,;&. So,
L--/..r-- 7 7 _
(--' '.--4.--g.. :..z..•••• ._(-- ....--- ,....-;0-74--ef...7X11, .././ 1./.,:`_5-- ;/-:-:".,_e „ . .1_,Z, Ir/e, 5"-e:".,
7 7 , ,,-
-4-
,1*.e,--7:_e cr 14, 1 4 is- ce ,-7/k- cic,4/ ;' ).7
.....
I ,,,f---K.,, ".•=. -7.3 ,..:L-Q.-(27-"---- ii,..0 0 z)- V:3_94e)---ct..-1-...- -1,) Cit.....-7..„. .,
' .
( ..• '
/ y,,,, .'7 1 I --) 2)"--- ib - gri___. :x.,--:1,-1: . • --,-(-u", (___ ••. /,_,C-7•-)6 (:3r'-: -/*)(
:-.,•-,---...•<--- ..,--,-,-, 4,-,-. . .
-... -1-.:1,24-...,,,,--7 , •;fe..#4.- e-,7-..), . ,
/ ,,, •
7 &, '. , ... --- •.. .,_.. • , . : ,- -;) , /4 i-:-e-i,/2 ./ / --/?:7,-/i _,), • .•_
,,, i , •
-.) /' ,..,/ —3' --7 7 ii---L../ •• .' A„.„,,,,7„ --,7_,. -. ' -- 1-‘,•r-4: :-.--, -i, ,...--,/,- , C .7. .6 -- J-
7-) rtAl LA:4- tfj.,,--)
A.,/ I ; i 71 S -7 T
-2.),\/6..-,..L..ct 0 11,---,1—c, A if-Itt.-,-1) i ,5' /Li - ... -
. IP
.,,,
•
•
"J.: -1, � + );•a 1. C..
Address ..., �:�_,"
.. . PRIII/, A 1::‘':0,i.: ,:''•:i.'..,;f5....... -.:' . -....:!,,,;:-:;:,:.:•:i.' „, . . . .. . . ,. . . .
•
•
•
I ? 1 ,
424:
::,..!..,:„„4,,:. ..:. .,,;,:....7. ._ . 1
•" .,--- . 1---7---i/4 ---<,L,.Y--:•:,,, .,
•: --,,. c7c_/.7
qg
' ' 4 ! TG .L. r•ti +t�. ,,ii! '� ! I/CSCv� CL'N -� JY .. ,� : � v :w%'�,' u
rkg,Cf •77' '_�, 77 l •G J' a _ ` _ -
`'', 0 :' :" „r,, ''', ;:3:; ( ' 7 IL '` :.:: 3.5 .: � " .
i '• r:'� * .. ' . '�::•rd�:!'J{,'.'3.;. o..ir: i••- ., 'hn,.!G,:ti..li i
ii2'�
Al
•
,',.1,. n ,+ - 1� • � ; � . 247� I• p : .lF. .I. r.,y,,,r,2,.„ ,!¢;,,a .-- ...�A / ' j - L. '.! ,i' 1• t.,' ri: ! ,i:�rE rnh{
. , ,. / � `�� ' , / D 1 :/ •C/ , �r^, ''' f,,.,
�AN� `✓( `ice—,I�.:.�}'„-`.'.,,,,t,�� ` . I .., '�'Yc : ` .
, 1��' Ir'
' '• 't=
'-4:".',A.4.,'•if.L.:- :, 0-..,_:.7
✓ •. .5,_ .3 .�r - ' .: 5i e • '• J•t.'t S_. l �1,4-Vi, ,
' • f ,� • � 'l' ' :�i• ' }•
-;I „•4'.' : ' ' i .:. `t',. . ,/� _� ,�� 4`,•l,?.;,!:'ji;xr , JNi O / 77 • - ' .✓ - ,
l:r ' .OL ,
-,,,,,••,•R'/• •.1/-
,.'.i'"..i;:"i':,'H j'-'./'.'' 9. 7 ' , , ,,,?../. /,.• ,,,.•.:-.',...,,,.•.;.;.„:.,,,„,,,, ,.,,L. ,a,";.,...,,,,,. :,::„:,,,,,...,i.- ".. -, .. .,, - . . , • . . .. ..-,,,,,r,.:. ..,........,!. _'',.ii,:,i,,. . .".-"t*-!..., .," .',
/ A.'' /7.1-A=4. •''''• :';egte•:,-.-- '''-' •-}.)--,-----.........);-—--. -=,// 1..t.L,P-;•<--- -.4_7),.. '4-&-2..42.0:4-'4;''.).'....:!..••'..?..Y.:1'0..,':`;');('q'''''••1„!..''.':'.'''..
, 'r ••
' ' "^ i '1:!' ,' i : `ma ;;J:) ;;•'i '• a , ,.J•.:;'
: ' , : : , ir,• ;xv *t '• �� :� 3�•v �11. `t , iq`r'e';'. `s -. l " .:,. , .. •IJ �•`'.�:� ,r ''4';':4 :,''" y.•.'. {7 o%
•
3
x . r4,1` y }•• 1 -,:i4 ,tY. -„ ��� Lr . '' .ir .''i c " Fr'lJ' r ,Yr, 'V'.- '. i ! !' + 1\ .(,(��.;•�? ,a .I ;S,rr, �It t� •11 ', , :'.•M"rl:.`. 11i!i'r•cr, .. 7f' .l'l:J,V,' 1 /,� ' ', , '' -Jlr., ` �V ' —: tii�� i, t, ,
•• 9• ,•t t
Y: ,I,
- _ :i', - :.n: _ +' "j ,,r.• •>'• ^R: ,•!::':�jS:'1' :;f, - 'j11•.',;;.I;' h.'l t'::,
;'1 :?• - • ,r ,.,.'t..;'r ,ip`c' if,,; •a': 1 i+r.,k''•,"i. �.', •,.1, {!
- • n�
7't
,r
• •}� f r
i � C
.I
'{:,':55 .l{, •`,r :•}., ;[;r ,:lfi' � ,;,,,,a •i;•,: lJ'4-. :1: .,..i. ,q•
,f l''V AA
,P
Yi
'v .
t
"i1R 'n r`r.
1� ,w
yr, ,li'• .r ,.Jo-• .}.
r� v. •_ ,y,•r
i
•
.tip, .�v!: • 1 _ l{~• . "•l,''.%.a r�yf ' Jf a.• ,;;,.ijn'4,�
p.>+ )'n�. •�:;:' h. vc' '•
�ti .• �nq, r"k°:ik:+:""�a, :h: !• ,.5,.
.1-
'ri r
•l I
▪ ;N"m a e:`•' ,
.Add e's�s, �'::�''`r
:rl! s
1
r{n.
['t
•
I
•'F„ r' r.
JFiN
r�1r'
.ff
;( .:11 J rr7rr
•
ga . . . .,. '•;'?.'+:` :,
vll l'
•
+1
it
.�`n' _:I:1 .I, ,.. r. ,.i ,i ,'t,t�i; �i
iar
, c • ,,rr�
ili.'.,:'.a.
'r'
.I • - 3
-I.Ir, I
t 'F
• C;
, /'� �•
fI�
I •
G �(iA=[.v -: ''',,....''•,'-.,'.I'.•:.''c;,...f',. ''•l '•. 'l Tf''.e y J� '/y UC .,- .CS.. ,-'krd;•:.. -`'i:.1.,. .. •' ,. 'r.';'';''.'.!.,••,,:
;-'
;:A•. , 1 -c ''' . rV'I.V.. 1 )� . /•(/o h' xL,/': •/f `� :f '\'uLJf,,.'. 4„,,':
..,',:,• •.',?';'"i;;,)..-.1::''2
,--.:''.',4:-'4'-'k'
' ?• ..
T',,.,,i'',,,',,,';,:'.r.j'e'i-..,,
t,:.,;..
L
,'.
, h r-i,
'•-'.,,;,i:".-,','p.'/'1.'"'.;.e'.''".
/,..,;,' — 2 �. . .4
...: 1 ,• 'Ana y r °.t:?<< ,. �,°,:
fi. - ::ws _ _ J' ir!a,l ,Y r'i:,Y•IN '',i'}�,:,V r
i
' .
"':r,iV �T.ci' •', ? %�./J L�G�r., /[7(�. ::,'' '/4'`'" .,:,.
'ti' ///(/..�fr` �•Y4C� ,,,,..,...,,,,,,,,,,,A;,,,„l� 'ir''
Y'.a����,r.,J r'f•'' y � „Y~ L� il' • - I/'- !'irP:'k�.+�';fa'-};:';>, ,q'''i.',71'+C^J`
• ;g 1'�'`—,77: (srn0j �1 ).' -:1 DG'E> �,C� ' ,.r.,, .
"•n f, - yb•, •'° jx•: •1 'd .. '�: "',4•.i,„3,1;?,rq hr', flti,":_r;
i''
._, s:d:r,.r,.,r
£�.a • ,tid •• • _ . ,{, .. ,•j:F,:.,rF'iaivf •r :M r
It:' 'i.•rr '"' - MJ' rt-a ',• e'
4
( / - i+: ~ t1rCi¢i". tea'
'fir•s", .. � /��/ /�/J'! � .' ,.. - . . ,. ��" •
�.S,tL'�.%., .!�-,.• !'1`r',.,54kY.},..;,
G/, y, ,�tn.
�a - :al,n�:''r
d— i%°
'r s
.i
Y 4)4 f)4 2.6<"
.2iu.. -�'i: i. . _��!„;'.. '*Il,,.i: rt<.,e. rS`i�i�,`J
,Fi.., I R • "J ,1> .ty"„l:,r. 1' f, r• r4',l:'F
:•,n ,.i� 'F' S.5 ";A,H.,[,j,�7 xl{%Y,.,. � 1 x.,,r
�f?"' ,'ri: n a 4", I f,,
J
''•',Ys�73 7
- i{`' i .. 1"
;I
�`f.V,; 0
.'i:�',',1 J„, l -
A 1.qC. , n1 r1
_
.V,
. : . mi �l'Uil1�0'; ;.:r' c',.•a
..,:1,.r>,:-'d'•
i""•.0
,t
•
.,i''',,i',.:?.. . ,.,, ,4 ,;,.' „,. - - '' • . .•-••::: ...,' ; ''• " • ‘:•'-'si '' -•'9
,
,. .
• :Y l'O w; - (17. V. /S Fy, e ^,l _ _ _ .r ,,. ,iA - : .'.1,�• v. f �tr• .
I•
r },I,YirrJ ( .,: ., . ,.t, �e r; : _ � ' !, r,�1;v.t�t :'v' .
Y .i
•
i1:••Rrj.{.S;�'S'arn1:r'`4;i . '
i ' ?r�p 9F•'.',,:a',.`::a, 1L Cat%1 r', '` ;S: -' z-f `; .t% " •Y r'ry n: ;y''
":i.e.� C(J..Rrirr ' 0, rya ::n,:. '
',
,,!
•
77
•
•
•
•
•
•
..i' � - 1 i',, (( ` 'ti+.ni i' ,y ii; .. i, � , :+�z' ; ` ' vt , .,J.� t - . . . . r' { J :t• "r:iS`.e;'ti_? !ii#iF .4� 0d5r� ' "`; ,y.:r,. pi:;r �a .v~"l�4Y I "% ' � '. 0 � k ! r, k?di 'Si,I // :. ;I "; 'I�l' ' ..� wrL4 '' :'�,'G,.. : n; ��� .s, , �;n"I:�SrR.,/ �,/ +�� 2 1•,"'N,, 'rw:'u;4';..;_ G :r�:, - ;40. .Zvt'r'i' - "'sr:a! Iti m '1 �' , _ • :, '„+y'., : /'ih `4 ! r 1 ..f � ��. / 'f�`'e.tl° ; u (yw,'i°R ,':tSit r' •f.'„,,, :fff " ' ; ',i�:•'; : [r � 7'A .. ' - a' ;' •[.L fa•u:i•i �/ ,?�,fi� ~' T .R
•
t.
,„,,,,.,
•
-, ,,,....,":..,,T„,...:;:,..„....,,
•
•
./. 7 rR% .t d ip, i
;.,3. .1 i�. J�• �t,,s
{. f'.r.l s
,1
, 4
r�l
a1'
`'ti 'ate .:: ... - _ ?;4r�,:."' • .4,Y,: ._ -{:,,, ,rt,';,, . ' :,,,,..�:'acr '7�
•;;'r;l - !;F.'•,^��'r�,:�yr'�aT.ii i� ;,k°l.. . - '/ cl. ,:2'1 -a
;rys';` '>'/"' -'/ .-- � • '7�'�:�F:/T�d.�'}:' •�, ;'� \ �• �� �� ,-��r,.J Ca91� ':��k; /1. )!((,'i'' •
"k."S, .' fir' 'yo., rx•,..'4.:'.di -'r� J`,- "1f. !'qj,l1
fir, '1ri� • _ • • - :Y. Y,:R '6:� ;L(
�f.7:i,h„„' `t .. �,� M1'Yw'r,A,,, 1'1 .,t.�li.
.I,J, 'fli.• c' - •:.i.,.,� ,i -i -T.1,1U.,5 : :,il;''i i1,?1 rl'''''0 f:iti ,� }.
r'�k..{ . ,ii,.,d l ,'.,. J ,. y4•d i..b.r... I, �Y'�i !{. E is
- 7,
1( 11
-t
1 �'f':ti'i„ n ,I
:f% r Y,•
J.M. t
E: •,f 1� ,,II
1�9 s �`J� S r•
f, }
,�.. ti,i 7 :f•1 I•• 1J 1,�i �7 �:,r .4 t•, J-
:.'�•t�'::n r4.
:Ir 1__YY
„d • ,�� .., a s. .\
4Y" �i*,i g' .. 1
.'Sr a.
_rya 1e �„Q,a:^,•'
•
,r i..'i'-i:J .
•
w''if arn•,:'�, -ram• :.-. •.;Y • /"/7G/ - _.�,. 'i. — Jr, iF i! �✓,�.
IJ �/� if. yy
{... /r7/J1, / 1,,/�//� Jam(} ;,'
7.
ri.,5.' '..iy✓!a::;71;d; .'J;i'. '', •�V:3',,(�' - V ... :.''=i • .:ter �. y ''y
Ilia ry4(,.:"Sd - � � ii:'., t
f'I .,�., �;v • v'!`' :N J -..:iY., J4(y:,' .,,,, y` - 41 11•w.°'' "' - per, ,.i;' '� „'`a;;'•
r, v7 r ,
•
•
'iJI R,I°„'.4 is:1.,% h`r .. ;'r{.• ,.�, P§Y- -, . .J ..f ,-, _ ;•�,
nag
.:1, • .,Y' ,, • ,�,.',A,` 11.•.:,,•tlt ice/ 1 .•� •:S -'' +",' �1 1,V $;,Ly �:.
•
,,1,,.,7„ +Li�!L.1� 1..'' ,�,' is • 'il,,, y Hi.'. _ 7': 'c.r
'IV,'
,. ,,,,.:;:. 9�/': ';: /�i z.y-•/. Imo► •.S `V____
•
•
•.':,,se"?t,,lq:. ,t, 1 , i� ;n',.
:,ti : ;;_ :7 dQ ,—�;' t -_s - :x, ;
"!';'.,.-:F.,,. Q '.-- v!r �� . , ,. :Yway •pr G� y '.
w
.':,i;a . 7r p f' 1 s �l1/ r 0‘ A-11. a` - tCCrb7 / •f•- 7
•
•
fir:. ',,, g;,� -t.
. , i 'rj•; ''
e �Na .• _ Address ` •,Fr.
me.
••','!••-; l';'''.,,,",';'.''•-:'-`.•':i ''... , ._ _ , , :, , , f.-'-f-..,....C.31.... 6— ...f.e... .. , •:"., -.. . _
•
` -`'S;.. ,-;� } �r i'I:: ; ,,. P .. . /zy) Ali// ,e. . /.elL •
';':,:,'.';',,t1:',at/• •,•7 T. . • .
,.-....,,„y. , , .. ..,..,, ,,,„ • . .e/ s
,r. k,,,D i( .,
• I '."' . i. a..; 7 '� ' ,I:({fi.1i. r t ,4.1.
,'iLYi:l„i'•{: . � � T77 " �/ 4�/�/ /!/, "`�4 A.iu .�.... /e1 C J•% / dal✓ ;,-,•, • �.,..LL
•
•
vu •y' l ' ' ' '. ` , / ' , L • r ,'1/.•J ?J�1I' , c__L."-4' lk,�-j4. _ � fi , 1 .,'• / .-'
•
c� -'P'1 ' � 7Li 5 • i V , l .0;, •.:(i • ''L 7{f ,'L // • l U t,-e !V -• I , . , . i
1 � '''' C6' • � .:,�%'�:Lr1 " fi ��1
f...
.'-;'''''Y'''S". •;PA2. /7--)': .''• '';:.'s'17-›*, /44 :2,•:•••••-4,/rt•Pj_(.7 _%(-6--,.. •,•- :,,, ..,..-,...1 .2e,, .),3 0,... ,gr. (,-(1 6-k-,.. ,-,1°4. /-7H-/. 0-,-t. '.• •
`gy:j ti / 7 1,• •',_t-'i-c,. _:,-,:
,..')'„;'I-°-.':1-,Fl. ' t /'.j.0 ? 4_,1, _.0t - r;Jl - `
:1.':.',''
...,1:;...:..,:';'..',...1....;..'..:-'i.;:'',',I;''.•',''.'.. ''....".....':
',''-,,::.,,,',
+ .:^'`7 / 7 /�,-/�I"G �,. Ij 'C I!,,C;,:. C/!/.! f7 JJ +"'/�'' '^;.' 7.r"
, ., ,-,..... ••. • 'a-7;''''' P 0'.... Itt_Q,:, , ,,,, •
.•';'.i"'?''4;',.. •l :`•, '..:-..• ),. : , ....• .
'1 • - • j. ','.•, ..
qi`, • _ ri ,'r:. • • 1 �!:',',1, ,4e!', l:'i�I'•'%�%nor,:rp-..L'
,;7. • .:,,, to-.:.:;, _:,.,..; •j,1•'•,,r4
P;,I•t,•-. ..
I •�,':'S,-f ice'%.^' • .4
, .•r'.'r'' ''i"'
4: ^
r / 1 1
nJ
��AA JJ'
�'L
JP/
1ti
'•. ip�'/ass;
. •,.:•;{;,: ~.t-.... �:j'll-
, ouP �V'H"1 't' � _.I �
- t)
RENTON HILL - *
COMM UN ITY 550CIATIoN
„‘ow to save our
ne19 bor oct . PIe,ase, br re).9
• \lour nei9hbors anct come. ±-o your '
community meeting on THUR51311V ,
EPTErneEK I ct7 7 a-1 :00 R
at the Renton Public Li brary . We will
be. 5hcir; r1 ictests cold prepare n3 for -the..
Renton Pio, nnin5 Commission ' s Public
Fle_arir‘5 on 5e_ptem bey% I1I±k at : oop , r
at Rev‘ or‘ Ci-LyAi.I . The cbuestion of
allowins apartrnervE aeuelopments
on Renton R; ( 1 will be. oliscussezt oinct WQ
wl \ hcue. opportvnity to' voice. our
opinions ,
Two petitions against apartment
cohNpte_tes have recervOeot. 02. 1g. 615 natures . -
more are neeAed and those. LoPio . I'kaue. not
sine.ct tAAII be able. to do 5 0 September Sth .
Plett5 e come (Ana con-En.% bite -6-0 tke.
to so, ue. Rertton Hilt O.
' 1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS
REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON,
ON SEPTEMBER 14 , 19 77 , AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING
PETITIONS:
A PETITION FROM THE RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS OF
RENTON HILL TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT
PERTAINS TO THEIR AREA, PARTICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR
AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY
BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH,
THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE
POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE, PRESENT AT
THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1977
AT 8:00 P.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
SANDRA GIST , SECRETARY
PUBLISHED September 4, 1977 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
CERTIFICATION
I , Vincent A. Tom , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE
DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and, sworn ��JJ // cA
to 'before, me, a NotaryPublic, SIGNED '(/ ti'�� " a` ' o - 1's---
on the \ day of `;00Nm*30\"
19-TT .
\\11.fkjS \ rig• \U ) '�
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
August 10, 1977
Page Nine
On the question, a roll call vote was requested with the following results:
➢UCKINGHAM - NO
GAIN - YES
GARRISON - YES
GIST - NO
MOLA - NO
NELSON - NO
TEEGARDEN - NO
MOTION FAILED.
Following discussion, IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY NELSON, THAT THE AREA SOUTH OF CARR ROAD AND
WEST OF THE GREENBELT AS DESIGNATED ON THE MAP BE RETURNED TO THE COMMIT-
TEE FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION AND THAT THE COMMITTEE RETURN ITS RECOMMENDA-
TIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE ALONG WITH THE ORDINANCE
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR A CHANGE •IN THE P,-1 DESIGNATION.
Discussion ensued relating to the amount of area involved, the need for
a new definition of the public use category before sending the recommenda-
tion to Council , the Ordinance Development Committee's progress on the
Zoning Ordinance revision, the obligation to Dr. Divelbiss and Messrs.
Erwin and Scott, the need for reconsideration by the Commission of the
entire plan instead of just the Comprehensive Planning Committee in
view of earlier votes, the lack of a revised public use category defi-
nition, and the extent of the current development in the area. Com-
missioner Teegarden noted that the P-1 zone at present is defined, but it
does not allow apartments, which is the message that is being received
from public hearings, and that the area originally under study included
the area south of Carr Road.
On the question, MOTION FAILED.
On the original motion, THAT THE COMMISSION CONCUR IN THE REPORT AND REFER
THE RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC HEARING, MOTION CARRIED.
6• ADMINJISTRATIVE:
A. COUNCIL REFERRAL:
PETITION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
The Chairman requested a briefing from the Planning Director.
Mr. Ericksen noted that the request is a referral from the City Council
in response to, a petition where the petitioners are concerned regard-
ing the Comprehensive Plan and zoning, as it related to Cedar Avenue
South (Renton Hill ).
The Chairman invited input from the Comprehensive Planning Committee.
Commissioner Teegarden, Chairman, advised that the committee recom-
mends that a public hearing on the subject be held and suggests that
it be scheduled for September 14, 1977.
Following brief discussion, IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN; SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SET SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AS THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR THE MATTER OF
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. MOTION CARRIED.
. . .„. .
•".,....,:--4.,;,--,,,•:,.. •• •,,. ...,-;',.'-'4.• -.!!t•Pit-',:•:,...f-.4i,,,-,:-••..1.,0.-,,,;,?.,1,-.....,,,,,,,,,• 11,, ,!,. "------,, . '• •
6‘,1,-..."--61,1-.:,--..:,,-•-•.,..•-.1'., ,,,,,•,,,•-• tp,t,-,,,,P..th:••,,,,!:t•.,.:',0,-•tre,i,,hriiit,:t ,,,i,-;,"43; .4•0..,' ,1•,,,,',,,,p!s•,,,...,•"-•• •-••• ., 14.••1
1.,.,.,,t .,,,,,---A‘[;d•ft.•,•!.•:'f,' ,•..;,;•;:.t,W,,,".4,,',p';,;:',,oh.1?..,‘,‘(,4-°°- '1:14'v.',.•''.,-1'.1 ''P'''-"'''POrAit°','''';'":,"'0,,q,=',-.1',4',V,;.,..;:, • If.:'.4.-,,,,A..: . - . ..,
tin.,,t4V,,i,‘"t4gOTTf 4i:..40101.V.ik,'; 'iPiri.4 'i'''' ' •-•*4-V'i4,r.,e,,P"".c,,,,",tf,q1,,..4 1.1..i3,(11?.,,,•,,,,,' . .
T , . ,,',A•,.
V•.?"‘0•,,,,,,,,,‘, J,dt-i. 4 '•-•.,, ,, l'Y•04: . r 4;‘,0..,,, ''' ii'llar,r t••r4k44-''' 41 NrirOr'' . IN:p
. p'
:Mi44'f,41)'..-- 4.04,:•%!;44tig..k,-"ftrr,,,,:i...VIVi..41,;?p,.,•,;/. .-••,..„.:''''•',„''''-'.-:••"- '-' '••,,,i igewq.k.WA.' , .
:,•!•,,R,k0,4,,r4P.41w.,•;t"i.ro,ii:Ve4444'`,1 • ' •.'"I;Oteirite-Ote•Nr41•O'''',1.*r• vb•i§2504Aiii. . . , '• p
t•,,“,:taiicitV,ti';'M'A5.-0.yr,4z,::;',',"1,...'•,.'2' '''''.s...'.'44r•":"gf471.,Z,,TAi .,.-V ::,,;'/,,,,-,:_4. '•V•ii4fittri!••,1`?
TS g,,,,,,,, st,....-6.V•4,A; .
. -1,0,4r0,40,,kfiV,Ii(PAII;ViligileV'P''' '',',..;44M-".2.,N,,,,,...0.41,.$;':,:l''.•':'.., ' -410- !.:4;p1Mrs%1 .
t.''''4.4-1';Illit!i'q.?''''r,',464f.;',.."''''...'''-•••3(-14e,'',att.',..a-it'`.,'',61 ktitYV.tfitraii'•,'4,V;#.!•Ni •--0'.1:6: f',,1-4,A.• •:.0?' .
11100.,,,.i.„..1:4*-_,•,/,:z•-,,, . „0,f,
ekik,...1,•:,',4 sis,•,',.1;.1,Y4;eit,•f....,'./...:'i''.,'• ,:-...,kfic::,s'r .• 'N'' ',.' '''•' ,'0';'',Vit •' ''''''Arype.;19:1-W'41..' ;•'4.;01,0,144tatti41 • .
. .
Pqt„,0k./P'•,,t,.V.f.1;0.• =14,, ...,,,,.,,,,,,,,,W.:1,Aya,,,' •-4100, ir, toA,...i ,,1• 41,,,:ib,lyp . ‘p,„,p•..igk.,-,4,1.,".174,-, • .
A.1.8,A?..,,,i4,.0.,.:,,/,,,,-,-.• -"' "----,. 'akkor 4 -'4',I"."- - -, ,;F, 4' '' API% •- .4., .
If.p....„4:ii*,,;41.,A,,m--klii1:-,,,tec'; Ai.,,,,,f,•::.•,,,,,..i, •„,,., , - - ..ki'nr6103gAva ,-, 'r r r''.-:v',,,,'16,1,'rAH'i • ,..'' • .
_i W,,...'iZ'VS,,,,%_ri-4,V,N,7f.',:•:,,•2-, •••,,.,/, ,, •fr••I', .,e,,,..,.'?.."4,'-' ,,,ie;,..,,,.. .1i...-,f,,,,,,-., „ '---- '.' ', ,-0i-, n,'3';.' : .' i'...,/ . .
4,44-4,.,..1,;S.s.,gipki-0.;!1.•,•-•,4,,e;-, -• ' . - ,-•' -"•,..• , !,. .! 5,1',;,^1.:4„,,p.g,.,,,i,-04 ,,,,,.,.,• ,r1.0 .,, i
PyfOliii5:li•l•„ip,,,ki,,,,4, ,,-; ,•• :'.•-•Pg+-•, ..,„,„,.,,,, •,,f::* A'••••IT. "•,•••4,,,,,,,•4 0,!,,•,,,T0.9,,,,,' ,1,(;„,U,!.4, •A ..,„,e,,,i.46 rt, I . .
f,,r?,`6-,..Att001;4,k,''AtOMttVePIVW5VO4;'-',Ng•-.,_.,',,t'71:;,.;a4.,..r-• “P'4"121"kfteelids. ''''T':;. 1;,1111114r 1.'7,,7§ , .r/
,.,,Y;.4,4t,1,,,qpilkpkijK.A'w•N,VrVitOW":-',iie,•'•547,415',..,i... ;',7;'" di•'''''''°''I V,"''",'''•:114r, '"P-1E•5•''''''''' ' • ,.",r't . "'•-•-c ,, •, . ,
it-Y410-4Xtt.:114,:f,'",'-'7tIL;-"V"?'' .''''A.%-:,-•'''' ,•..1.1.',.,J*kPvipr..--.„.:*.Skai:VOKAL':::,;,::,...,.4:,,,4,,,,A
poR,.!Al,- ,,-)-,,,,,,,-,,,..:,,. ,.,,f • -/ShAit'614.,.., - , ,,,,,,:7.,:,,,,,,:,,,,, YffrLi:,...,, ,:.*:!$HP•0!!..,7.44:1114,4'A',r';.; ,
t I,A •
- • i ,..!:----''''
1 r"--
.. i A., 1.1 .11,4'. •
Ihr'A4jiP'',..'-'1 r!'',IJ:!'0-11'0109Agth* O'C''1,:t' .'..,g!;:, ,,,,,,kir, f.--i,, ..'1!. 4,01,"`J,rti -SX.:fki,' 'L./
`f-A't A"TPL.r4::C PA'•l'''no4.1i-'P1,ea•"• i '
''.. t.ti.."-f,:..L ii;-'' ,'-'''',4,'.:,Fel:'..1`.4p14474,' u , i,/
. 'o,-.14.?..4 5,41,1440,-. tteitiocp t,Pi. tsY•fk,g,,,...,•A.;,,,„..'°Pl"-
Utiltr4kk$j:--`•';''%&PAG',. ?..,/,,,•::,-,,-,, ° 2° "''''' ''''''4";',''1,, ',,,x,fin cptiltik,,A0. ' .,,„°,k,'",e",•vq., . . :,
AAArgti),S:115taiiatl?tv,A,''',:, ',,1*.' .,4,,t,,,':.,-...,,-,'.•-' '''''''''''''''A°:'°`'4•14V. ':•.p.: 41a-Pitt ., •,
{,7,:,..1,'.1.;,21.4, -"I'''"'*• 7,7?..02'"Wilri,4,
,Irigi,r1;iriFfiVi-,•,,,,F,,,,,,i:,4,;,,,,,.... 'r''''''`Th' •'..' %;f4,1,,,,i,g,,f,,4tv,0,.4z '4,'.,,,,,_1'}',*•;f4, r.I.,0 .5,„,-At, ;i1,1?A`O .., .
1.?f,,'„,;r-,11-'''.,yitt,'!IVti-Wi,C,i1.?1,V;4•J'''ZAPII•44.t„r4413.,a-,-,;„.-1,,,,,,,. ,. ':-'''','r'''''INP''4,-',WIV.'•'j.5P''.!!t1,,'W(!.q;. ' ,V
eaq'ry4 f:'0.4'0':6:10,fia':',03.. 1",,gatiefi.ii.40'*?t,,,-"'Yllify`:'2'.•'[.?1 rt:tV,i''''q,,,,,,t,.....:.-*:c.,...0i0t. -4-4; . . . .
,,,,,,,,, A,.., .,..„,;,,,,,....,,,I,,,,, 4 4;••.1, '''. .,,,r.'w ','•i -4,-, e, -.,..At i.i‘,•,•Z'•..r.„.„,....„,avt.,,..4,, . . .
, ...,", ,,.•,„.,,,...,.,..,"2„,.:$, ,:,,,.....,,,,.,4,,,a„... ,,,,,,,, !,,..5-,-! !".",,-V.
ii$Vyyggv!,'!,...--.!,,,g2$= /,,,,,:,.,,,,',.3-1:'L'r''''Ar •'''.'Yy:- ...''',..r---t,--..,.., ,',,,"' '.'' F0 411071.0.7 . '.7' Afill6 • . . . ,
,,,,,,•.` '`5,,,--,,w.,,,,,wcfrilo.,,,,, ,.-0,,,,,,-..,‘",..,,-,?:4,,,-0;,.,,,s..„. ...,,i-- -.i.,::,9.,..:;!*,...i.,,,,lx.7-,,,,,," A,S.,77. :_,,t,,,,,,,•:-744. ,41104,:, • ,
;14014'''r1,11400K5r01444‘.34,t •..4,4':•r•--1:7410;'''1„,1.2',i•y•'01.,;''xi.,, •t,.. 7'ili 4) :#0 . . . ,
V,-*'?'i-' "'-' sagitvr•M'1"A`0•74*),&-,,,,fr,:,-Ak,,Ahne.;;41,21,1-, v.4, ,,,,,,,44..,,.,,i'A! ,„0,„, ,,k,12,,,. ..,4,,, . . . . .
, . .
,,,,-..-4,- ,,,,,q.i):i.,,•:,,,,,,,,,,,„ !.--;::;''-'--;-'''.'-';''.441''''P•I'!""i'•0•414,ke!*'!4•03;41ef lit-14i'VW,-,T.i.;'-''''',;!,1. ••••,'.; ,;)11-,'i .. .,. , • . ,
1,41P !'',4.'igt,-;'' -''''' •4?:viri.,:,:: :.az,)(,..,..,01,,,,,••,,ri,, ,,„ ..,...;17,-,- - • ••,•41',,,,,.4,s% 9,),,(..„,,,i,,, ,. 1:-,e, , . .. • . •. ,
. .
ki,,,,,,g„.;.,..,,,„4-,.,.40,,,,.40/7•.,-.•., ...„.....,,,.. .,,,,,,ove. --4,,,,?;.0.,,.... -4,,g,;:ux,..e. .....,..v7ot-,,, ,,, •-..,,,,,I,e4t.-- 7,p, . .
...vi:, .....datioir. ...„..;. pty,19:4A.:/'.he.4,.:•.,.,4,,-;• ,,,.4,4 , .
.. . .
ztii.4_,Z$4.0rt; :,...:,,i,.,V,,:.',-,-/..,:i5.1k.„;,0,,,.,,,,-7,•-,. ,- '' it ' "' 3''':' , .,I.'A'•,-1:':,!;ft,'-i"f . .,
' 4'.V+.,:lig, • ''-'I.I''''- ' ":" %,',0;%,,',154,1;:i0e,.tV-'•,,,-,-',.,t,„,6 ,,.. ' 'r''-'''°' ‘-','-,,,'',..., ,---'Aki,,.;,,s,i .
PO',11.''',:oede ''' ' '''''',7... ''':4',!:,•-:'',,,,,k4',...''''.4 11:";,'.::';1;':','..,,aV '''.1";4.S.,,T,W„ifoot•ttt--01$'r;Vt.l. ,
0,',19;v."-ftl,r0.;‘)?..'... ,,,•,.,:.,,,,,•,... 7.'7'.t''''-- ( V'2,-..:'''•';n0!,*.t,"''. ''.' 4!!:',.;‘,1!4`4.,0", ",.70,•• "!..,g, ',1415 . •
li'''''.e....1`I'l ..--`,'•':i!Ur''•••04g41:-V,112; ;A•IY.,/,',•:,-!•‘!,,,.‘,4,-,,4:-.-. ."-',• • -!'"jr,..'41.4••:•'''•VI";,: . ',. ,.. , .ifq ,
ii 11,A*t , ",,,,,,,q,,,, '.t.-}, ,,,,,,mot-,;,•,. ,t,(..,4.4N4,,,,,k.' ,Posoi.,,, .1,1;1•Pn.`,.•:r.,,91,,,,,. 'k 1"Prk1/4410, 4,11" . ,, , .
%1).,--0.i4;y.,:,,,,i,.11,01,,, ,. -, . - .,„.., 1,, ,,,.!,,,,,,,, ;, .... ,..-0 gov,t••,,,-sce,,,,,,,I.0,,q,..• r.,;,., ,
t .i•Vett'''.".'' .'tti'' ..-,,,Pttftrs;,..,•-;„,,,,,,,,„„ , . - -,,t'ar,,,,''...„. , ',,,,4=tititAirtit7144,, 3.11',., . •
„, ,,,,,,g,,v4.,, „,..g.. T-rt,1,4, L.,a-4 el.:14,4• , ' '' '' -,••• . , ,
. gl'AVt '''*9404PY. l'-'''''''''''''''• •-1'N''..'.•,.4-0'''''''';6?"•io-,r,'*,,,:•,:4,,,,::,. .,, ,.
ft..:,.L':*Ors,ftrAr',A414. I -' ,..r. :• •,,„:„...,1.4,1•••• •,„,,,,,„„..,,,,,„,x75..onlo„.„.,-31,14:.''-'04*z•ti3O!.,,tt ,,i,ii) . •
!!!4.4tittk.k,t!4V••••',.-te!!''',-!!!'..4.-.i.4,.....-.- ---oit,y.,..64 4,... .:.,'"•.4,--i.,` !f".4••-•,,,,!ito!" ,v•-",144,t'A A-944-31..-4 .
kr:t.,!'' ''':'N•"'-0,1,..'41'pt,p.',P! ,--s.',,'„z6-44,., ,,,,,,.:-. - ... '-' '. ,t, A'''',1,eii 1..•SA IP , ' •
rE010..,;Cl:;,ie*,41.4i ''' ;', ,..''' ..''' '''''7'4,4')Af4P4''', 044.Al •..,:??11,,,A,V4,4. ,,;.''i
' 1
Ziiiii'.P,',St,;,-,l'i-j.,
-N:440ii.41,kg 15.5:Keit:', IN'l'''!,.%::-k,trNigg, ;;'g'''PA-4112,:0414.rq.''..+:1,1::Lt.IL17.,.X.'' -'211.',,,:, 6';4
1
. .
. . ..
. . . .1041444:0';f4'0V"..41.‘,;9'"ni4:..C4Whik.}:tPle6.,f4,4fAT;3;44f4t4910,k,*flp,"- 4iyq4';?:,,jt,,C, .,
,2.iiif4147:14'1.1t M'ilZO•A'-'1i$,W,0-,''fil';:i-',V.4,4!;•••V,e;'1`,! ;1.1-'',:Wi'?,' '"•'''t514.-t- 11- ,;•---ki,.0,>" ,Li,4
- ''''" '','"'""^..'-'''L'n". ,i'•!. ''-.4-4;ji.Ni'l,Mit14,;•,,*- -.Vt':'0' .'-,,r fialkt3IRItIrtigIVR'At,1„. • .
.• ... ..4,',Uk',,C-f,41461-044*:'*14:4(
.p
p . ,
, .
. • .
. .
. . . • ,
. , .
. . .
. . . . .
. „
. , .
p •
, .. . .
, .
, . . , „ • .
. • . . ..
. ,. .
. .. . .
. , .
, .
. . .
. . •
. . , .
. .
. . . ..,
. . .
. . .
. p
. . .
• ••• ,
. . .
. . •, • .,
, • •. ,. •
„•
. .
. .
, .
. .
,..
. „ ,...• ,.
. ..
. .
. .. . . ..
•
. .
, .
. .
. . .. .
, . . .
. .
. .
. • •• ., . .
. .
, . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
•
. . p .
. • ,. . ,
• . . . . .
.. . ... .
. , .
. • ..
• .
• .
. .
• .
. • .
.. ,
. .
. ., .
• ,
, .
. • .
, .
. .
. .
. ,
• . ,..
. ,
. .
. , .
. .
. .
I �
r i • EP . „ .� Century 27 Homeco,rli.iInc. y
_
.> 280 Hardie rdie S. W. 772-5000
3�� JJ
71 �1 :4;
—— J u L iB ��® ke k'ree: � or , _ ,® M QEA`Toa•
Each office i5 independently owned and operated.
.
Meet therea1 ta te professionals
..,. iin . . _ . . . .. . .. . , . , ..
. ....
. ,. . _ .
- . . ,
We're Here For You. . . C.
.9
,, ,
....,
! \ , ,b. . , ,,„.,_„ ,
90 NEW Homes Cedar Crest
Condominiums - i .
yv t
r<2 ..» e Sa• x
yaw ' ;
Ar
s'j� < ;
•
Deluxe 2 bedroom 2 bath floor to ceiling wood
'" ,., burning fireplace: Thermo-pane windows. Complete
. -, h,;Y4b: ,. ., security system, cable TV, built-in vacuum, low
+ ,t , �f`s maintenance construction (life time), professionally
: p` landscaped, sweeping 180° view — Kent to Space
`J.,- °, Needle. Drive to 629 Cedar St., Renton. 3 blocks from
s � , 4r•'•=r; > . s Renton City Hall.
4EMORANDUM
TO . Gordon Ericksen DATE 6/27/77
FROM Willis Roberts
SUBJECT Petition - TO REZONE CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
Kathy Keolker, 255-0936 , called to inquire regarding the
status of their petition . (She originated it . ) She was
advised that the matter was currently under study by the
Planning Commission ' s Comprehensive Planning Committee
and that the earliest time they could make their recom-
mendation would be a,t their August 10th committee-of-the-
whole meeting , and the Council recommendation would follow.
She and several of her neighbors would like to participate
in the Planning Commission ' s study - said they have some
solutions and alternative ideas .. They have .a legal repre •
-
sentative , Gary Faull , who is also willing to become per-
sonally involved , as he lives in the neighborhood . She
would appreciate a call from either you or Clark Teegarden .
They are 'also concerned about new apartment construction .
Is there any way to stop it while 'they are waiting for
a Council decision? '
undersigned residents and property owners of .Renton''
We ,, the u .ders�.�, .
' Hill, h y petition the City of Renton'• to rezone Cedar
ere single family' dwellings . ,;. �,._,; • -�'�!.
Avenue
South. in its entirety' for sink , '' .,�� ,rr l�,`,,. fr,' ''',
excepting those `Multi-famil units ' currently in existence
o,� for this change: based on the following: ri ',.,i lr�a ,� ' •Ic{ ' ',' `i "
We petition 1 • (
1 . The �:raffic /Pattern, accessibility, street widtfi-0 ,.7/
adequate to 'provide :'for the extra l'"'' `' . ...
and parking; e not \ .`-'.4/ ':';a.rk,. ,s::
P the addition of multi-family.' dwelli.ngs, '%'i%r • p•, ��;^'^ ;; `'.
congest"T ��n causedby , . ,: C �,:,:.
We have enough difficulty flaw without .adding to the. problem.
2 . Our property is considered view oropertj" and
forfeit our views .'by 'allowing apartments' -"°``
we do not wish' to r.Ji3,
to locate in our neighborhood. All of'.us' take pride
in .1:.'
our homes and ,many have gone to considerable expense (both . : '
in time and . money) to improve and modernize our older homes. .
Our neighborhood is a quiet place to. live. and we intend to •�4� J�`
keep it that way. J!};�� ' e;
Resp l - a�ectfully= '.submitted, l�.njoJirii.4' .r<
The 'residents of Renton Hill
.,,, /_: on '.Cedar: Avenue South
•DATE NAi E • ADDRESS -
^ .^Cf '' ; 7L 1 . i ') a ( - NV 1 . ._ - ',
1- r 1 > i1 l �- i'1�,•t.� I\` (4-1/'14'4 c)1 C.V ' _l ', :;. `� ,:..' ," W i^�. U !\ 1 )r; -0 4f 1 a r 11
f
7 r zr,.. ,1,,
- . ' r r( ` ')�! ',1 ;�.,��\'c,)'1Jv I/'.�:1 /� . ., .,1 _ t ,. y. :f' :.iLS: :;i:::c:l'•;.
✓,,� ,. / ,1, 1
r
Y .1+
r :
4 �.PAGE..U. E TTI A�E I
RESa . • e ;;.1t':
'DATE NAME' , : ����:' ., .:;ADU
G I,!`.f51. :�•C��y f !. ,'i;,"•
^1i -,/ !'`.: ,,,, r — -Y /-- 'L. /. ,,•, . rn ,off^
r
•
a:.. / .. .,t_,fL `._- •, Pl , 'i , 'V"..- 2.. -'1-•Cam—•Ft.•• -- fi_•t.: _ .1 ='
•
_
1
J
,4
r'.' '
! y
., r :` I:.
4 r
Y,-
•
_ i - i
i'.
i,i ,
'''''''',,- ):'. -, ':..,-;,,,'',::-.-,=•. :.1.,• ,:. ' •: .• .. — • . ' • ' • - .' •''• •..•••;`,.;',,•.••?..:.':, ,..'''',' ''''',, .,;';'•'?iN:''-',-.•:',i. •
_ 1 '\\1 ..
/
/ S \ 6`n
T
Y• ,
:
f •
• i'Y
/
r I'
F
4:"`r
- • r�
a�
r
)lt'•
C
•r 1
r.'
s: f
, i•
/c• 1
•
_ f: •I
1
f• 2'
l
--s• • r
.. 4
�r•- 1
,
'
r+ ,j '). �' .'•��"lam/-�(•�.:! c-'` 1 ' i�-: ii`
1
/
;f
' • -
)
l.
F
r.h• !.. 1;rY1/ ( -c•i 1':'C ::G,`'•tL;-,.' '�= jJ 1. 'f'..
�a
r
,ice.`.
i
d7-
`GE PA
P ET 1TI 0.
ADD -
'`���'• ;:DATE
• • .:
G
,4
.
J
l • r'
Via'
i
r-.
.7 —
T' /
- fr
•
•
•
l /' • ✓ i f• r i • `n /. i `ter'r 3:'' • 1 ✓
l _ ,
,
,'
_'l
7
•.
1� ,
• ••,,' • • • • c','i ,,; ';
- i ••
•
' /
Gam':' •
•
.
r�
r.
•;a .,.
ram^' i• %J; I. ' ) �:?
L�
elf^i•
J'.
ram'„
C._ C�.11 •
r.. r l ;L
1
.. • tri tj,l:, Ci 'i':b'
l'•,Yi
t.
l
_ _ .cif•• - ..
., , - ,
-• , - 'I
•
• • • : ,•.. .:.• • . ',,J.,,,i-p.',',.'„iy.•ic ,••,•:-.:::,;,.,,,. :•.
•
' '.• - • -.. ..„.,, •.,,,, -„.;,,,,,,,i:11,...:,.0..,,,,%.4,":z•kci..i•;.:,'',,.,•:''
:',.'''.4" ' °,44'' , • ,' ' .• r.•, -''•-,'''''''''' .,......,....-.7.,:.,,..::.. . .',,' ;',.''.,.'„in,''':•,..,':,- ..... • .', :',,...,.......,- ,,,q.:','.,;,;.,:,,;.''':.-,4.,..'-':,..,,,.,...:';'•,„J'e„;...,..':il,',11'..':',. 'n.,?i,n.'.,-.:5,'',,''..,';',',',1„' - ,
;.. -!.' .ilt`7, • •-,,,.',',-.''''*4 ,'..', ., .,. • , - r• :.,.. ..',.,,,-. .,.-.‘,....).. ,,if...'',,;„s; . i .• )..*0#.qi...',,'' ' . ';!•,...-.',.:4;:".`',-;,, ,;,..:,r,:t,:',";•,:•,: ',.,..,,;.-...,..1•,,-",:.' - :.•'.....: . -...r.,.'...,-.';,.'',• '.':.',.'„;';'.,,..i.,...';',:.,f,l,',.':',,, ','.•,..,'',',:':'..;'''',"..'e:')i-i'...'''''':V''.' '
,#'' ''.ks:.7.•'.:4.,,',;.',:-,i,,;,,`, ..,. ',;.:,;.,,'.,,.;:::-..,':,.:',•; :.' ".' -';',..,.'"'2,;'....1'',:•::-:#';:..,:.‘•.?' '/ `;(': A.:f-P,';', P.IC'''''';'''''''';''''''I'''''''.'"''''''''-"-'''''''''. ' : ''..:,...'' ,',..::, .,,,_•.. ,.. . •,,,.:... • ,, .;•.. . • .-'. •: . .„',, ..„„ .....- ,.,,:,.,:. :y..,i,,,.?.1r..';.r.,i,.?„',,.:;;.)'',;,;:.'-:,
'-'''''':'.'._,.,1,•:',..'.'::•'.;.')'-P.:V7;.,';',.'..:.''-. ''',' "''..-: •.....„.. ,. ,' :.,..'•-,:::•.;....,-.,..,-.,'$'11:;',:1,.,:,,:,';','17.4!..".,,!;'=1,0',c;;;;. .,./!,..i.g:".‘•:,..-',.'„;,,,'.J,:!;'.';.,';',•3'..•';:;;!,y:i1;::::',;.'..„ -;::-,,. .,: '. • ; :' .• ' ',.' •:`''•• .:;•,', ''.....''',...• „•,.,''''1;;;!,,..,..,',.''',4;';::'..,:'..'''' ':.,r.,,..,.''''• ,
3.'i,..,'C'7':-.,•,i.. .,,!•;1.'..;-„.',•••.::::''',''...'.:,'....';',,--,:',.;c:'• ,...'.1'•1"/-F-kf`..;':.:Y.'.; "4:i'ilr.::';',',*-1:':',',',.A'',,;`,..`1....'''.':!:,i,qir:.,-,-,'.?''d . , . ,,:,,', . ..,: ,'•_,,, ,.,...'- ' - ' - ,•I': ,i'- ' '' ;' '.,-.! '':;; '.,. „,
.2,,,.';:,..:...,...,..,,, ,...,.?:..-„„,.,...,,,,,-.'..„'.:'...,,?;;,;•.„••,:f,l`f,',•,-:•"...:."':,..,5•!.",.'t1,,,,:.,.;:',;.'.vS,':--'-'ij,...,F*:-;1:•'.-. .- ii)'':::-.,-,,,-'' •: ' '''. "L' . . , -, -: -•, ' .•,' :',..•„',.,-:,, ',....,...',•. -.. ,..,,, .,r:',.'......:...,',,,•','..,‘,'.:''•:,,,.'", '
'''Jr-,';','''''',''',:•41:''''''':':''-'':'''''',','' -- '" ' '.'''. -...., --., .1. • --:-- .',..: • ...:' '.;'_''.',;...... ' . ,'• .-,.. • . - .' • ,::,'-.;-.'''!.:i.'.'-' ,',I. .--..,.'.,...,:':,77..,;..',.;','•.i';.'''
'.;'4(;1,1,.',f;i,':::;,,,,,„:„Pi-','',,'. ,.,..,,,.„•. . - 7'.,,' .,..-,,,...,,s'...',.:',.'../,• .,,•'.,;'-'..,:,,,,,•":1-':;••,;.'.':....-:•,.-•-",.'-!-•-•','.;-;;',:`,f.: i. ,'.".•,4:"•.... ,;''Z':•,';'';'''.,..1...1."•"'1-.'.',4-:"''' . . ' '' .,.'-'• ' • •' •' ''..• '--' ..''' ." ' ' -. '....,,'.'.,:,r.`;':',..2 ;'', '
II
',I•.`;'-••;i'c':`;',;''':.;`,:',..';'.......'L.,'.'.'.1,'..."".•,'..'-''' .,' ' •;;'.-• '-'..':::',. ;•:,:,e'.,.4.'.'..',.',.'1,',1,4•',"i..,.,,:-','.:,`.'::!•':".',;'.4.°..)1.:1'.,•,'if,..''''.''.''.----,.,•.. .',,.,,,-,::.,' ;''''.,,',. .:.:". , • - ' .
•
. ..
. '' ' • . 0 , ,
,...,,,I..,„;..',44,,Vf,-....',.•,- . '
.;.4,:',';',?:';,,:'..,:-..i..7.,:''.'-,' •.' • • ' ..*,' "..':,' .',,."',..,:,,,',•';',..‘:'''.'"i•-'''..:',.,-';'t.:"‘:::"•:'•.':;',.,-..:','',":„'..',:-,..,''.2:..',..',' •.,' .,'...".'.''''','4-1.,'''...:,-,*. ::'..:.; ' -..; I'.': , “ . :. ..-,'•,- '• ,- ,.. :. .;,::,';',,,,,•-•,.", •.':;.,!,•
•,.i.-,:.•. '. ';',:',1'.,1`1„;'...r.,. .:.. , . , ..'...,* • ,r.':.q:::''....,',.......'.-,,,,',0:'-,,,-,,,....':%1,r•:,---;.-.).. 21,-(-:.'",,,-:',1,.';,;.,,'.'.,,.:. ',. .-.-'... .:,•,..-:•,-.'ii,...''',,,'..-.''' , '
. . .
.,;.='S''..2...„.7'1.-',....'',. .-.• . ..':
. . .
, ' - r;, ' • , .•. ' '''..'..,,,i:.,'1,•;„.-. •,.:.;:...:,..ri',i.-",.,..,..,,,;:b'..•....'..;„.',;•,:',-.
,-:-...-t,,,-',-:',,.';.:,•,:,... . '.
.. . .•..
'',';,....,-„,....;„,;:,...,..........,;•-, ,. •,.. ,• , .. • - - . . _ ,,„ „.„...,....,„i..„..„..,,.,. ',::'1'•x,''.. . .,•.-,.....,,.;4,..•;..,•;.;i"..:•:'•:..,•:,42.:....• ''• ' : • ',.'..'•..' : ,' ,'.. • ' .''''•:—.Z.;•.,•':'••••.,'•.1•1':',•,,..'''....';!'.1g,.\•..:!,•;;,;P,:,'••,•,,,,.•:•
•;',.''/••:•••-.'.•..•!,••'....'"::',''''''.' ;',„''', .;,•.';. , . •; •-.,,.:.'; .‘J.,...:;;''1.:'•". ;.-•,:',..,i,••. °•.,Y,';','",,,'":" .i.'i..'','X':'11.''';','',.',2'i:•L'''S..'.-i.••.',•.,.;''''''','-';'•...'''...'5';'C',l'''''' '.•••'''' ....••.` , .' •
,);',::1,,`,.'ij,Y:•':.'::,,,•--;:::•'.:•.,•-• -..'......,!,'',:fi;:',, , ,'-._ • ; :,'-'''',.•'-''',',',';'•:-',.,---,'",;','-,::''.',: "-,-'',',:-•,•"•.',.,..;-••••, ... .•••,!. ...,7;,,,,i.:••,.,..-.,,,::•,::•:••,•:.,.H., ,,' .. • .. •-,..:;.-'''.. : •,: :.. ;:,;,-.,- :',•.:::-.,•::. • •.•,..f'''' •,-..'. ''••:. '-',',.::,H--,•,,...
;',.,,',•':;!,,,•.--;!,,,,,,...,-... . :,•, , ,,,, . , . ""., .• ...,....-......,,,,,,if,;.,:-,•:...„•,,,.,,--!„-,.-,;.:,..•••3,-,,,,-,,..,,•!..;: ::.;.'•.,',- ,,:"' .:;;•.•''' '..-.'d-/-•''.'•'•"'• '•';'' "' • ' .• •'..-.. ' ,•.•..'', ' • •••• • ''' ' •-•'•. :::.,t,-•'::.:::''• •
'.;•,'.•.i.',1:',••:.::..:.-,;-:.,j,•:•1;;;',',,,;::•••,..• ,‘ •,. ' ••.•,-"-• "")) ,:,- •':'.;..-:•••;.1.•,:•-•';•..::•:,,..,,;• :; ;',•••,•c•....-:,•:.•.:,,,•..•:"•, •••'•::'•:..•:•.•:"•:"•:'',•'j.'.,'1-'.''-' -
• •
• ' • .• •••-• • - • . .-..,„ .:,•—. .. ., ,. ., , , , .,. ‘ . ,. , ,. . . . ,,, ,.... ,
::.;'-!•:',.:•,',.-;::,•,:,:.•;': ' ' . .- - - ' •
".:',.;•,..•,;,!•••.'••0.....:: • - -
,.,•;:..:'.•:--.'.',..:.•,.'. „ . ••,..„,••,„-• ..•,'!.-'...:-1•,.;•1.•,,,.•:.•:,1-..-".•:,•;"•-".,-;::‘,'•,•,•,•:•,'•-,.'r'.„•,.....•••-.;•:.'••.'.''••••••'.'••••••'''.f:',2" - ' ' - ••.. , • - ; , • .•• .••.' „•••' ' • • '- • •„,,..,.•,•••••i;•..•: •:,
.,.,
'..;;.:•..1•,•;•;',-.:.-...,.")•••!',•..", -•. .•:'-''-•'—'f•-' ' ''..•••'.-1......•,...':•••-..,:••.,•:.'":•:• :•-.•.i.M•36,•::,,c•'••••,i":‘:::'';F„;:.;‘:•••..••,'J...r.:;:•*."••'''.-...,:::''.".:•••,-'..;•'-?-,',';''..• :.''',;'•'-' . ' '.'' . . . ''.''.. • . • - , • • •••• ..--.. •,..;••i....','.i1.••. . •
?•••,,••••••••..,.,-..,-,:•., '••• ,., „ • , ,'.. „. •,-. ...•—•••:;••:••-..'• •••f,.'1.,,•:.:,f,..-;" ,•;'.;-„,'••• '-....,,..t,-;:.•:••-';',•:••:','•.,'•••,•3.,i,.i'...',c:•'..•••:•-•••-"•'"'•••••••,--..,;• •'..'1,.....f.••"..', ','"'•••';1..1.- •, ,- - '...'.:,...'•,,,i•-•••••..•• '. ,'•••• ••••••'....'•-'-•..,- • •• '..,'- .,' ..,,,,,;•,....,.. -.,...,,I.;,:,-.• .
••••.-'.:••••- -:`:-',...;1';'''',•;--,'•,i;•:•.:•••• ',.:•-•••. •• . •'•'••..:•:,,:',•.:v:•.••••;;-1;....;•••'1'.',..'..:',‘".••••`; '•-:.'-,'''•:•;.-.i•••,,c,,,,,':"....,.'•••:•••,,•••:•••.:,•••',.,:'„ ::.,,,..•.v•Y•-.••',•::...,•.'••,..,•••••••••,•.••"••'.'::' .". .'.: •-.:.•4::C,'...t..'., .r.,..'.. .:, '.,.. -,;' :'2.:.:.,`'.' '•',:',..'.:','''''..:....'',.i'7,J,'.'g.......'..;.!q..,,,',. '. '
:::::'i;I' ?:IC'::!';'-'''''';'''''','''''': ' '.. '','''' ' . i. •' ''''''....J.::.:,f':':('.1.....'t:'''(:-.C.' ''''''' .::-:9:::f.:T:::::;,'::..:V.'',...::, ,'' : ;'..,'::;,,'''''''''.'ii:',.:'i'''':7';'-•-;:.',.•'.:,...; „.,I. • :-''....';',....,'::...,": .'2.::"'',''', 4:'''.:'''.,:,r'''';.1.:'',:':::.,,:.i''',J.:.:':".'"•,•'''i.;.';;;-''''`'.''''. ' '.'
'''''•::;;':'.::;''::'''''''''l'''': " ''''. " ''''..- ' . .: .' ''''..'.': 1...:':.:-::::.:::::.'C':::-;:;;;::''..::;;;:'::;::',:e'''......:::‘.'"'::::,1'''''''''''.'''''''''''''::!..,..'-i;:-'''':,:i').'4 '....-:::;•'1:,,'.,'..','':' ''''''''.i -''''':-.....:-.,': ':':: •:".:• ''':::;'''''''':!:'`',:li'.::::''..':'' '.1;''.-...':::1.,..!:!.,.,.....'';'t:1,(.,,,..,i;',,:: , '''''
',:;,..'::::,;',.:1''.''',,:,-::,'.2. .:, '•,1'. e: :- ..':.' •6.,,,•.';'.‘..•';:.;::.:',-:i..;:.::.:^:!:'''F'..".,...1.''''')..:•;..;:'1:.::.:2•V''t:::::;!;;:'::''''':.'''.';''':'.'‘..:::::',‘,..'„:.. ''',';`:/J,r.'',1,'.';,,i'.'''.'''''''':'.I....' ''':: '•.''''....,', :1":'". :.;l'-:( .:'''.''.:'"•:'•,:'.:::S.:1'1...,1-.':::`l'' '''''''';''...::''''''.i.':"''''';',;::'''''';,'''f,.;' '
' ..'''.:::: ''''''',:'.','„.-''.. ! . '' '''.''''''...•'.... '4 ' '',.','•:'l:...,..:';''.,....':i.....:'4,`:''''':•:','I'''. ';'-'.,'*7['.',`-.1'.:',..-.,i;.•-e c.';..c.:',..•':,.',.;.,',''`'.'.',.-,' .. ''',•".•.'•,,,.,,...;•....,,'''.-• '•.;',,'.,-'',,..;,‘''..'-,•-,.....:-,•.,..,',,,'.,,,,,:i',',.,,, ..•-•-':':;:'.,',•:,,,:'•••••:,,:: . .
...,.:,..,. ,.:,,..',.-'. .-- ' . • " .. . ,.„0.....'..,,...,.:.,.;.)'-.....'i, ''.-..-',.:.,,!..'!'J.',.:'.'::;`,,''..;.:''.,•'..,:::":.,.;,•,..i.;',,'''.,..•.n.''i',..:,':':::•.-"'.''it:,:;,...,.,., .;:-.iY',..,. ,.f.•'' • .. ''':',;•..'-....,...i:r.-" '.„' '':.'''.' , '• F r.,'''';''''.'I 2.':.,,.'' ' '...,,.::.'2,':',''' .:;,';'•.'.:,.,:.,C • •
- ,.....:• i'.''',...' -,.. '.':,;:,,..:.--'. ' ,,,,-,,,.... ,-!-'','',.,'...,';',' ,',..;`,.1'.-:'•:-,,.,•;,-,••:i, •'•`• .. ... -', -... • - •- " ,...... ,. , '':. ,,,•.',,,j,Fr,,`,.,•";•••'_';'.'-:,If,l'J.,`..,i;;,',..i,...;,,':'.!!' '
',:,',;-.',::::''.-:','•• -,' '''..."''''.',.'!', ,(,;:,..*.•:,''......:,.:,',;-•,.., ':." ,','-'•'','!'..:;,-,f....;!!„,,, !.•,,,, ' '.:'''':', -.':'•'' '. . . ',C.•..,'''.''''''.::'•,,,',.-'.,;',...z.;''''.,i.''''...' ''''.;',:;''''',-.'''
.. ' .,,,,'-...• . ''•," -''''..: -,.:P. i....,.. ''.'•',':...1.''-','''.,-,';',','.;i,
'.'',:...'::•.....'''••.':''' '• ' ' ' .- ' . ,.',..,• ,''' ','. ;27',-...5) :',),•''...'-'.''."'',''',1'-,'''.,' ::1,, .'.:,,'''':--.',:;.''-.".•:•:i''''. ; '[..:,'V', :. ,.„'' , .. . ' .` '..'" . '. •' :''.''-::.: '.'::::,''....,..':.'.: ..-'‘:?..i.,,:';:..*.,',.;•'::',.,.;.:.;,' ' .
, „.,... ,. ,„ .., ..,,.. . ...„, „,,,, .,,.•••—.. ,. ..,.,.. ,,,.,.,., ..
•
: . • '-\ ' . ' '. - .-; '''.'.....':',:,...''''•".,',",',':.'....'•-...,,',,',4:1';':',- -,:.-:•.:;',1..i....!;'',•.,'','•••••;:'.'',;,`,;',,,., -:,....-,,,..'....',',',.',,.,.:;,';•••,',,I.,',..`,,,'',.,.',.,,-,.'• •. .'-.":-. ..'•','..-..;.'',•';;-',.'f'.. :- ' ,,',..,c'.5.,:'',,'','',.',';,',,,.',.•:.,•:',,...; '''',,',i,,i.,;.,',.?.,,•';:,.',,=;•,',,,11„.. •„ .
'..''',', - . , . ' ' , .. " • , ,':',-...r.,:/...--....,`:',.,Y,',:.'`-.'•,-';'.,i: ''''','.'1!''':'4.,"•.:.,I'''''''';::'.:...'i:.';'!i':''....;;..''•.,,,s,',11.,1•:':,;',',,,.1'':''A.,''.''':'-':•.:2;;..''.'1;`•...,.`'_';.'-•''.,'....'' ".., ',:'..1..':.;, .,',,''',••;-,'..,: '' .''''',.';'':1...?...'..',';':',‘,''';.:':,.',;!:-;'!;!:',.::''','''1,1"•:fi'..,:'7',;:,',;;;''•-') '. .
, .
. , .,,. . .. ,, . , . , . ., .. ,,, .• -. .'. ..,•. .• .
. •
•
•- .
' . .
. .
. ,.
. ,
•
, .
. ... . .
•
, .
• •
. .
•
...
!// -- ' ..-
ExNisir —I
-. c EME re-RV
N b ' 4 '4*
a..-. c: =r , / /
. liva!!" . . .... .,.. .::::::::.........1'...:1-i.i:::::,:-....::.:.,
. ..,,,, . rmi, . , -......
_7 III �cr, I�t1
may;} ------,-__
-, � �. :'�ii.
t I ma.m.or ir an
?-k, MI sr rm sr...i1.—<—'7 , "-t(--.... . ' - -— — N 0. .:.. ' .:.:i: '.: : .:.1: '
•• s,,,7 .. .,. . :. .. : ,
.. min y m _ .---- „
. ...
,,,N. - . :-.: .:.,
- ......„ H.) "'Lad Iff' /A= FOE.. misit . k
W3. ;
0 > pr.= .♦ a r i' gym_
p..;.4.1...014.....,.-1,7:,;•!.,: 6r..,..,,..,,.m...n ,w.„ Hini ,
(. / ram I fit' ♦,• .<
.r,,i9 v., , . ® •,;
.m....a. •
Nit,
. 'ii.- 1 .4, 1 I VSI ''' 11111 ' ' H-1 ----„S
, , ,k ri.:,..:—. i i&t. §E .. .
i !I
hi
`et, rb
na n r �sr . n u�i
G
-�4.- - ,;y •
r a. __ .„.. , =-- - 4
s. # r r ^.♦,,
ICI
S I ,ti
refillii lis) .J13,, I ,:,,1 i.: :j
!V� ♦ NNE
p_i ,y e/ •
j0 ® _�_ • 5 P - Pn�
r
�.. fir.
i �Bo,,,..—I1P p0r,p.‘.... Jiir..a,d=i
P p.p,.1.,,1„1'
S.
- 1
-, ,iI,plrkki
1 [
, 111,-''
r ---
an
a0 , ,
,,,
. .
REZONE :
CITY OF RENTON , File No. R- 178-78, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R=3 TO
R- 1 ; property located on the west side of Renton Hill and situated
south of South 7th Street, east of FAI-405 , north of the Puget Sound
and Light Transmission Line Easement, and east of the subdivided
property. .
APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON TOTAL AREA 12 . 1± acres
PRINCIPAL ACCESS Cedar, Renton , and Grant Avenues South
EXISTING ZONING R-3
EXISTING USE Vacant
PROPOSED USE Residential
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential
COMMENTS This is the, first phase of an area-wide rezone initiated
by the City of Renton . Three ownerships are involved in
this phase.
:7,- .- -._7_714,_ . . ..-., __--.7--- ___-_---- iggi : :...::-:::::::::. -: "r.t
,,, A.)11 !11 111�4 ? Tr
- 7� -
ll
;,'':'- )-.11::11111.7..1h.C:tPir -1.4 . .-1'lt!i. air/i; Ag DWI NICSI -.:.i
-f--
' • ' rill qa ;*ti bil 1--_-. ,, \ , - .
. 11N1
_ i H... , • J
H
♦
4t. A .. - G --
/ d 1 ' TMTM
7-0 'MI e •-•"' IR '' r ..-1. ON - 13 A 1 I
-:\'‘
' / /' f.,r- t... iii,il i.11. ,. • 1
; J!
1
. tt 0 0 Cli ma ..1. GST.°1 ,..
L.. .'1 , , — I y ,. ..::: N, i ! R-1 • h 4/40/4;1 , . . 1, W : 40 all ‘,:• 4- - -- ... /1••
- , LSUBJECT•SITE `� =
•00:0••••••00000/01 s
/�� I o ,I
i GS- 1
i.
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT
COMMENTS IN WRITING.
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT:
•
CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550 •
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, -200 MILL AVE. S.
RFNTf1N _ WA_ Q f1Sc •
�i `�, //
._.- , >e 1 , //,. L'. •
Rv
Renton City Council
6/6/77 Page 3
Consent Agenda - Continued
Energy Director. Other members: Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner,
and Clark Petersen, Library Director. Con��ittee will coordinate
Conservation ,
Committee the City' s energy conservation measures, Information.,on.
Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs , Joan A. Walker, 1433
PlanningMonterey Ave. NE, three-year term on thePlanning Commission
a served the Commission effective 7/1/77 through 6/30/B0, having strv..d or. he Commission
since 1975 and presently Vice Chairman, Refer to the liai and._Means.
Committee. '
Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointted. Peter Banks additional
Judge Pro tem Municipal Court Judge Pro tem. . The letter explained Mr. Banks is
with law firm of Hardwick and .,Conrad, Evergreen TAliding; appointment.
effective through 12/31/77,' Refer to Ways and Means Committee,
Consent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNC.I APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AS
Approval PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
Cen.
Senior Citizen Letter from Leland Pumel , Chairman, Senior or Citizens P�i ann i nn Corr�ri,ttee
Center informed Council of motion passed unanimously at their 5/16/77 meeting ,
recommending' that the Mayor. and City' Council pass a $600,000 limited
general obligation bond to complete the senior center. MOVED BY PERRY, .
SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL_ REFER COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMUNITY'
SERVICES COMMITTEE.. CARRIED.
District Court Letter from Mayor Delaurenti requested Committee of the While agenda
Lease of 6/9/77 include presentation 'by Del Bennett on lease negotiations
with the County for District Court space; lease agreement must be
executed by 6/30/77. Presentation to include proposed allocation
of space for Municipal Court. Moved by .Perry, Second Clymer, Council.
refer communication to the Public Services Committee for review and
recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL. ,
CONCUR IN REQUEST OF MAYOR'S OFFICE AND REFER TO THE. COMMIPTEE OF THE .
WHOLE. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: THORPE, SHIN, OCH, BRUCE; 3 •
STREDICKE, CLYMER, MAYOR DELAURENTI VOTED AYE AND BROKE TIE VOTE ,
MOTION CARRIED •
Latecomer' s Letter from William L. McLaughlin, Jr. , 10630 SE 176th, .Renton,
Agreement requested a latecomer' s agreement for a water line he is installing
Water line in the Kennydale area , noting the plan filed with Water Department, No.
W-463. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST
TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED•
-, Renton Hill IA petition bearing 63 signatures of residents of Renton Hill , mainly
Cedar Ave S. Cedar Ave. S. requested rezone of Cedar Ave, S. in its entirety for
Requests single family dwellings, except those multi-family units currently
Single Family in existence, based on reasons: (1 ) Traffic pattern accessibility,
Zoning street width and parking not adequate; (2) Do not wish to forfeit
views by allowing apartments to locate in neighborhood; all residents
taking pride in homes and having gone to considerable expense in both
time and money to improve older homes . The letter noted the neighbor- .
ihood is a quiet place to live and intent to keep it that way. Moved
- by Perry, Second Stredicke, Council refer communication to the Planning
Commission for review and recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY
{ SHINPOCH, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST FOR SINGi_L FAMILY ZONING
ON RENTON HILL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION •
AND HEARING _EXAMINER, CARRIED.
Advance Refunding Letter from Mayor Delaurenti attached letter from City' s investment .
Water & Sewer consultants , Seattle-Northwest Securities Corp. signed by Richard T.
Bonds Kennedy, for advance refund-
Vice President, recommendations
ing of $2,950,000 Water and Sewer concerningevenue Refunding Bonds, 1976. The
Mayor' s letter concurred with Mr. Kennedy' s recommendations and noted
'Kennedy would meet with the Ways and Means Committee 6/6/77 at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Kennedy' s letter attached schedule of existing debt service and
Proposed refundinn issue and savings . noting meeting with Public Works
Gonnason and Deputy Finance Director Bennett and the Finance Director,
Gwen Marshall . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN RECOMMENDATION AND REFER TO THE 'W,AYS AND MEANS.__COMMITTEE_. CARRIED.
Mr. Kennedy, City' s investment consultant, was rntroduredi
1111
101
Gam, ®� �iSy'.,�is sL/ o I rs tl ---- - BALL GROUNDS Q �Q
40
kI i . I / •
444
i I
,:`��h
✓HOV E, 1.'N. �iC— �� .o`` °y,,,• e Q) •PARK vc ', ''t�, yry• ' ' i .1 •' Q
•
i 62 /o t I •
ss„
Bo 07 r .c; :.. p-1,- • S \ \ • ` laJ 1
Tro5 ! 0 ! l �� J ' • ' �c\ � o�a+
8a0 p • � e . ®L / PAS K 2 , •s2 . a �` it('
; KING/-_ - ' i� OfI rr�r �1 Aa 3 R 89
Inge a % O "' ��-�6J 1° ,� \ \ /` \, //'tip . ...4.......... .
BS 7.rB ® f�' .• Fo V�• � .� a v�9e�pQ •��\ // • ;;.'
n sB a ,�\ ' / (i� •
/• �4.
2 ° j7
.,. -- ©' �,,6 9 125 ,.� o / 2t/�s.e, �`,� • ''�� \v OP�J� �ti , Cedar i River
e� m s 's/ 3 (41:.:0.4°
3 'l I t'•�. I;.- !
IOO ® vs 6�i+v "i, \\iT 67 �j/' \\ t`// \ ��q4/
a 86A ?.'• -o s: \ \ OS, OFF %cN.r
�' ST
' /p�'`c1,V }^ , (,I I9 l7 a° /10 1 y¢y /,,t J `�(, c.\\\\ /
a2 • Si . y*.e orl ' 2 -18,re +n •w,. 2 .12 ; , e''` eJ \ .,,,, \
I$ 1I`__10-- 17 _®, 3 Il ; `'
' 60 t 60 /'�
4z - 17 - --- .wP"" 4 16 . ® 4" 10 /2° b°v tl • i l�e
—;I 1 -120 1- - - �/
. '' 218 5`, 13 r(..ki -a�` ,sue. •(o^i
219 —1 - ® 4 ,:a 'P'- ro .•:: • _.A ...,.-.,„. . AGO!/' �' e0t<
------ __
/z°225 •_226I z ^ :7 ' ..; ....... „^. tip �ya� { _ .
.. T
t z?: p , � . k -' •••' RS.E. R/El/ b/A WAY .9 ... '\ x .
8 �M 230! �., It' \ \IT` ,
9 \\
•
9°�� �.. . ntvr •• • • I 1 I 270 \ -
,F�� (^ N 4' 11 IC, 3 mI 1 -°°N : \
10 J • v .ti A GIF •? IL:r ; �I I f I \o I* 1-A \�/ I AAA' 14+ic I s•s `,fob M '[ x
ry0. io ° I A
7----•------_ �` 3RD
cT - --- T.z./97 fj•
m s (G - ,,. �o I a:.' 1 s2 I ?2 1 4° 66 ..'(',b -./SQ. I /$O - •'I o
Imc�14 °'• 1tl✓F' JQ, ��G _ ,20 ', .(11�II �j �j f_°g °: 300':,:� y �I ' I INTERPACE CORP. .o .p
Lg. y) t rypw;� w.:' •Q —19_ -- - 14, 1 1 I 'i 31 I.` �I 111 II 1
•.ti.:: I I i I 1 I I , 1
30 �• ; N•. ,/ n8\ 18 2`3'J ��,' c° I I /37•S 1,f SO C \ t
e I o 'a r 31 3 \\
1.1 309c. �6 ® dr I.
I _ 4 /:. •5 \\ \l�.l= .� -3i5 I__2..--- - 'S-µ 3I--- U� \ o , Lot/5
/ 3Igo Eflcl• of Gout.
J I 2
`, is ''C
\ �'S-�PY`.� --- JOG' N I 2
3 0 aw'"G° 1 I 32 3� 16 , , I 1326 � p�a I n
i^ h a �' l _.._ Ira r— ,may-—- - �- -3-O - �� O
5 S y `.1 {,,, 't �33_.a)\\( 330 QI ti--- _ I \1`.
r� 00, �1 ''. = m3 1\\ • 33 i .''/ �I \ ,e O
e /,��/ '/pII._ {`�'7_.N20 t '� O T .;.1_ 63 -\�`.\ 4 ,I �, A 2)tot \\\\ O.
T ! 1 OPEN b W �.• �' ``�`� 7 1 (liv \\\ O O
O „ r;s
3 n o\ .
T.i
! n_ .0, ,,,\ ______EL
to
a04 60 1 --.. C^ 411
3 18 - • • 6 . . 410 3 I8 r to e4 \ L'•, - -- .- y P.S.P. B L.CO. Sz_�
1Z -- cl, 41 3°° - T.L./C -
!:/H dONAT/D lM�l° 3�_"7 14� t-- �� \\ �.� Q /so i _iso -- -- ssa
..._.. N
6i; ! i 29 6 IS 419 -
! �' • Es 7 14 25° 4 ° 'B. —i _ -- ---- N 1
... . — 1 ,��j-- -- 7 \ -
Q f3 . ` • - , ® 8 -F3-1---N7� E 7 I1 •
v \\ • 26 ' 1 I
1 1...1 EI74 •10 II J �.`�ja Sao \ $
/20 ns o P 5 r.l
QPEN 8 t
l4.CM '_' x,� °�
I VI v. y es 'I au5 1 20_,so;^,i 500,.. `�5°i (. \ ' '' ' s
24P1Ell -! 3 �1`_ of__ • ,j ..03 � - �-..y \, g� � ,. �` .0\6 � `„
3 i (Lg1 .:j I _ ES 3 18 sn e
\� �' ai 1 r,L./4i�l °13Q. IL
Vj v 4 17 - hii '� �\ ,� y 6B. / �ti 03 \� a.Er
Ca
zj I s O �� 5.0 16 519 rG •SI$ ®Q I 7o0.6q \ rGt'� b •r V/' lit 121111111 Act 7 VI
© 6 153• \•• 1 I 524
el
6I ' 4s k. -- - •--- is 23 s I ® \\ \ \ .41 "\ti'�� 1---------4 o
7 , y ..Jr: sza 7 14 S25 - --/s° �_ r�O !.3 I �7 e \. \\ ;� 3~' 3 -
o0
8 �q4 11r.. g I3 :.. , ,3a " ¢ ,z 5t, , ;�� �y �I
, /N IA _ 1 I ____== 2 a° Ln ��\\ �o h1 39 (tI
li
Pl ZAhk s1© E 535 % 60 1 N.38 (0 II ®/i'' sB rro ';i \ .. 4v3C'II 5 3 cpII. ,0� �1 I 5 5 } \\ S �} �1
( ® • J. Wr 6Ttiare /. I.- ®� I - --. 1 i- i t ISA.\ /20 R: j /00 �1
/ zo; t (; 't I,2--------- t7t. v i Ez •, ° -4' ! a. I 15 k.n I
° n a
®, 6 I �, ° • o j , 603 ` :'moo 6_�r;?* ,. I �0 Jc
, ---m--. \ 16 N /50 I DSO y. I5°- /.: k: e►�N II\..I� �<
I( 11
6E ! II r� ,`' - --' 1 — IN ,J_ - a- e VVyy r t- i \ 9316\0 ��
PP I� T.z.4 1 -. .�.... - 11 4`' a ,o� ["p] s \ 2%\S /%� q 1
I J • 611 - 20 �, ,�,�.
i.,.? 7. s /5, cf-,,,%.... \ -. ` \% f IZ;'i
• a.v., s.3 -\-- 62 3 608 ,k. V. 62r `' `' I G ----,544;? 7 \ ��`� I
zDa (..) IC IL f 12 I'. .I / 1
---- -- go
6 �- m �12 m �; ,�r l qc t •1 4S `S \ 0/6.36
I QC. ,`40 'F''• I ° 32/° --7, I ,q.... 5' w
i Ar TL.24 .. •'•j : NOT OPEN• �s' 'I \, S. / TH -_ --. \ �,} a
EXHIBIT C
• [Nos.44603,44604. En Banc. January 5, 1978.]
PARKRIDGE, ET AL, Respondents, v. THE CITY OF
SEArmE, ET AL, Appellants.
[1] Zoning — Rezoning — Evidence — Necessity. A rezoning
action taken without the support of credible evidence is arbitrary
and capricious. •
[2] Zoning — Rezoning — Basis — Public Interest. The neces-
sary relationship to the public interest will not be presumed in a
rezoning,such an action being adjudicatory in nature.
[3] Zoning—Rezoning—Basis—Community Views.The views
of the community may be given substantial weight in considering a
rezoning request but such views are not controlling.
{4] Zoning — Rezoning — Judicial Review — Administrative
Record—Necessity.Judicial review of a rezoning action requires
that the agency conducting the proceeding provide a verbatim
record of the proceeding together with findings of fact and conclu-
• sions or reasons based thereon supporting their action.
[5] Appeal and Error—Findings of Fact—Review —In Gen-
eral. Findings of fact which are supported by substantial evidence
ID
fan 1978 PARKRIDGE v.SEATTLE 455
89 Wn.2d 454 •
will be accepted as verities on review although the reviewing court
might have reached a different result bad it been the trier of fact.
6] Zoning—Vesting of Rights — Building Permit.The filing of
an application for a building permit vests the applicant with the
right to use the land, if the permit is thereafter granted, in accord-
ance with zoning regulations in effect at the time of the application,
provided that the application submitted and the permit issued con-
form to zoning and building regulations in force at the time of
application.
.7] Environment—SEPA—Purpose —Delay. Neither the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971 nor other related statutes and
ordinances may be used to delay construction projects merely on the
grounds of unpopularity.
Nature of Action: A developer sought review of a.
rezoning of property with regard to which he had filed a
building permit application, and sought to require the city
to issue the building permit.
Superior Court: The Superior Court for King County,
Nos. 783462, 792863, William J. Wilkins, J. Pro Tem., on
June 10, 1975, entered judgments in favor of the developer
iirecting the prompt processing of the building permit
application.
Supreme Court: The judgments of the trial court are
zffirmed. The court holds that the record on review was
inadequate and did not support the rezone and that the
right of the developer to a permit vested a the time of
application. •
John P. Harris, Corporation Counsel, and Gordon F.
Crandall, Assistant, for appellants.
Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship & Austin, by John D.
Blankinship and Jerry W. Spoonemore, for respondents.
Roger M. Leed on behalf of Capitol' Hill Community
Council, amicus curiae.
•
456 PARKRIDGE v.8EAT1'LE iun.1978
M Wn2d 454
HICKS, J.—These two cases were consolidated for trial in
the Superior Court. On appeal, the Court of Appeals con-
tinued the consolidation and certified the cases to this
court.
The first case, called the 'rezone case", follows from a
writ of certiorari issued to review the action of the Seattle
City Council in rezoning from apartment construction to
single-family use eight lots and two half-lots adjacent to
Volunteer Park, but separated from it by 15th Ave., E. The
second case, called the "vested rights case", follows from a
writ of mandate sought to require the City to issue a build-
ing permit for the construction of an apartment house on
the same lots. In the "rezone case" the trial court voided
the rezoning, and in the "vested rights case" the court
directed the City to continue processing the building per-
mit application promptly, diligently and in good faith. We
affirm the trial court.
In 1957, the City of Seattle adopted a comprehensive
plan and a new zoning ordinance. Block 29, Capitol Hill
Addition (No. 4), was classified as RS 5000 (single-family,
high-density, residential zone), except Lot 28, a corner lot
on East Galer Street, which was zoned BN (neighborhood
business). Two years later in 1959, the City rezoned Lots
15-27 of Block 29, to RM 800, a classification permitting
apartment construction.
In 1963, the City engaged a planning firm to determine
the best locations for high-density apartment use. In 1964,
a report was submitted to the planning commission rating
12 areas in the city as suitable for high-rise apartments.
Lots 15-27 were in one of those areas.
After reading the planning report, Paikridge, in 1966 and
1967, purchased Lots 17-24 and the easterly portions of
Lots 15-16 with the intention of constructing an apartment
house thereon. Parkridge's petition to have these lots
rezoned for high-rise development was denied. Thereafter,
the market for apartments softened and plans for the
development of the site were postponed.
Jan.1978 PARKRIDGE v.111TTLE 457
89 Wn.2d 454
Some gears later, the City ordered Parkridge to repair to
code, close or demolish certain of.the structures on this
property. December 5,,1973, Parkridge applied to the City
for a permit to demolish one of the houses covered by the
City's order. Pursuant to a private arrangement, someone
in the City's building department notified a group known as
the Capitol Hill Community Council or Capitol Hill Land
Use Review Board of the demolition application.
December 10, 1973, the superintendent of buildings
received a letter written by one who had received notifica-
tion of the demolition application. The letter demanded
that the City require an environmental impact statement
prior to issuing the demolition permit and suggested that
specific information be sought from Parkridge. Four days
later the City notified Parkridge that it would require a
comprehensive environmental assessment of the developer's
total plans, including the information specified in the letter.
Parkridge did not agree to provide an environmental
assessment at that time and no demolition permit was
issued.
January 4, 1974, the above-mentioned letter writer and a
group of Capitol Hill residents filed a petition to rezone the
Parkridge lots from apartment use to single-family resi-
dential use. Parkridge dropped its efforts to obtain a
demolition permit and on February 7, 1974, applied to the
City for a building permit for the construction of a 60-unit
apartment building and paid the required $1,200 fee.
Following various hearings of the planning commission
and the city council's committee on planning and urban
development, the council acted on the rezone petition. Dis-
regarding a recommendation from its planning commission
to rezone to RM 1600 (multiple-residence, lowest density),
the city council voted on June 24, 1974, to rezone in
accordance with the Capitol Hill petition to RS 5000 (sin-
gle-family residential use), and passed ordinance Now-
103510 to that effect. The mayor signed the ordinance on
June 26, 1974, and 30 days later it became effective. Park-
ridge responded by filing a petition for certiorari to review
19ARKRIDGSSEATTLE Jan.1978
e9 Wald 454
the action of the city council, thus beginning the "rezone
case".
•
After examining Parkridge's application for a 60-unit
apartment building, the building department's environ-
mental section requested a "complete environmental
assessment". On April 9, 1974, Parkridge employed the
planning firm of Clark, Coleman and Rupeiks, Inc., to sat-
isfy this request. At the time of trial, $4,484.20 had been
paid to this firm by Parkridge and the final billing had not
yet been made.
On August 1, 1974, the building department sent Park-
ridge a form letter notifying it that where no action is taken
on a building permit application for 6 months, the drawings
submitted with the application will be destroyed 1 month
after written notice to the permit applicant. In response to
that letter, Parkridge's architect, Hawley Dudley, met with
Walter Green, a representative of the building department.
At that meeting Mr. Dudley learned of a possible change in
the method of computing the square footage of a site, which
in turn determines the number of units permitted under
the building code. On the advice of Mr. Green, Parkridge
modified its plans by reducing its building from 60 units to
50 in order to avoid a possible conflict on the appropriate
measure. On August 28, 1974, Parkridge's attorney advised
the building department that corrections in plans were
being made and the environmental assessment adjusted
accordingly. Mr. Dudley continued to meet with building
department and traffic engineer personnel.
In November 1974, Mr. De-En Lang, of the planning
firm employed by Parkridge, reported to the City regarding
the assemblage of environmental information. Despite this
fact, on December 4, 1974, the city building department
advised Parkridge that under the building code the time for
acting on its application had expired.. On December 31,
1974, Parkridge delivered a 52-page (plus appendices) draft
of an environmental impact statement to the building
department.
Jan.1978
PARTRIDGE v.SALE 459
89 Wn2d 454
Responding to the submission of the environmental data,
the superintendent of buildings sent Parkridge a letter on
January 3, 1975, listing eight reasons for refusing to pro-
ceed with the processing of the permit'application. The last
reason was that the site was not properly zoned to permit
apartment development.. After some correspondence
between Parkridge's attorney and the building department,
the building department notified Parkridge on January 27,
would take no further
1975, that it was standing firm and
action on the building permit application.
On March 4, 1975, Parkridge sought a writ of mandate to
compel the superintendent of buildings to proceed in good
faith with the processing of the application for a building
permit. Thus, the "vested rights case" was commenced.
[11 In the "rezone case", the trial court held thatordi-
nancevoid
No. 103510 rezoning the Parkridge property
because, (1) the decision to rezone the property was
unsupported by credible evidence and was, therefore, arbi-
trary and capricious; (2) the rezoning of the property
•
resulted in an inverse spot zone; (3) council members who
did not attend the hearings failed to listen to tape
record-
ings of the hearings, denying due process of law and an
appearance of fairness; and (4) the City failed to comply
with the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA):
We agree that the decision to rezone was arbitrary and
capricious and since that determination is diapositive of
this case, we do not consider the other issues decided by
the trial court. We do, however, comment below on the
requirement of a verbatim record.
Because review of the action of the city council in this
instance was invoked by writ of certiorari, we look to our
certiorari statutes, particularly RCW 7.16.120(4) and (5),
which state:
The questions involving the merits to be determined
by the court upon the hearing are:
460 PARKRIDGE v.SEATF E Jan.1978
M Wn2d 454
14) Whether there was any competent proof of all the
facts necessary to be,proved, in order to authorize the
making of the determination.
(5) If there was such proof, whether there was, upon all
the evidence, such a preponderance of proof, against the
existence thereof, rendered in an action in a court, triable
by a jury, as would be set aside by the court, as against
the weight of evidence.
In this case, the trial court determined there was no credi-
ble evidence before the city council that would support a
decision to rezone the Parkridge property.
[2] Without a verbatim record, it is most difficult to
review the council's action in this matter. The trial court, a
judge of wide and lengthy experience, was unable to find
from the evidence that the rezone bore, as it must, a sub-
stantial relation to the public health, or safety, or morals,
or welfare. Washington ex rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v.
Roberge, 278 U.S. 116, 73 L. Ed. 210, 49 S. Ct. 50, 86 A.L.R.
654 (1928); State ex rel. Modern Lumber & Millwork Co. v.
MacDuff, 161 Wash. 600, 297 P. 733 (1931). In other words,
the trial court could not find from.the evidence that the
character of the neighborhood had so changed since 1959
that the eight or nine lots in this case should be subjected
to the exercise of the City's police power. In a rezone
action, adjudicatory in nature, the required relationship to
the public interest is not to be presumed as it would be in
an original comprehensive zoning action by the city council,
which we have held to be legislative in nature. Fleming v.
Tacoma, 81 Wn.2d 292, 502 P.2d 327 (1972). (We discuss
this point further later in the opinion.) In State ex rel.
Wenatchee Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v.
Wenatchee, 50 Wn.2d 378, 383, 312 P.2d 195 (1957), we
quoted from State ex rel. Synod of Ohio of United
Lutheran Church in America v. Joseph, 139 Ohio 229, 39
N.E.2d 515 (1942) as follows:
"In determining whether respondents' administrative
acts and policies may be upheld, it should be observed
that the usual presumption of the validity of the acts of
•
Jan.1978 PARKRIDGE v.SEATI'LE 461
89 Wn2d 454
public boards and officials, does not apply to acts involv-
ing the forfeiture of an individual's rights or the depriv-
ing him of the free use of his property. . . . Applying
this exception to a case like the one at bar, where public
officials seek under a zoning ordinance to deny a land-
owner a particular use of his property, the highest courtof Maryland has held that the board of zoning appeals
has the burden of showing reasons sufficient to support
its authority in refusing a building permit.
(Citations omitted.) Proof must be adduced in sufficient
measure to support the rezone action. and the burden, of
proof is on the one seeking the change. See Fasano v.
Board of County Comm'rs, 264 Ore. 574, 507 P.2d 23
(1973).
The City contends that the evidence makes out a strong
case for the rezone. The trial court found to the contrary.
The evidence upon which the City relies is set forth in some
10 numbered paragraphs in its brief. We assume that this is
the evidence considered by the City to be most favorable to
its position.
Virtually all of this evidence came from two documents:
the letter of recommendation from the Seattle Planning
Commission to the city council's committee on planning
and urban development and a memorandum from Council-
man Miller, chairman of the urban development committee,
to the other members of the city council. Whether the city
council considered any of it, we have no way of knowing,
absent findings of fact and conclusions.
After carefully reviewing the evidence selected by the
city, we find only 3 of the 10 numbered paragraphs to be
pertinent and supportive of the rezone. We set them forth
below:
5. Since zoning to RM 800 occurred in 1959, a signifi-
cant change in attitude has occurred in the surrounding
neighborhood with a pride in home ownership, very much
improved maintenance, and a strong community spirit
being significant factors.
6. In view of the changes in the neighborhood since the
rezone to RM 800 took place (1959), it is highly unlikely
•
462
PARKRIDGE v.SRA4TLE Jan.1978
89 Wn.2d 454
that the Planning Commission would, if presented with
.such a petition today, considerr f proval
RSof 5000ucho Ro ing.
7. The property was rezoned
800
in 1959, but to date no apartment development has
occurred.
A changed attitude in the neighborhood indicated by
improved maintenance, pride in home ownership and a
strong community spirit is an attribute commendable for
the residents of any area. Perhaps as is suggested, a strong
community spirit opposed to the 1959 rezone might well
have persuaded the planning commission against recom-
mending the approval of the then proposed rezone. In any
event, the original rezone of these lots in 1959 must be pre-
sumed to have followed from regular and proper procedures
and we are directed to no evidence in the record which
would suggest that the rezone was invalid at the time it was
made.
A reference to changed attitude in the neighborhood was
made in the letter from the planning °commission to the
council's urban development committee, but it was not fur-
ther developed. We do not believe the mere assertion in the
letter rises to the level of substantial evidence necessary to
establish that conditions had so markedly changed in the
neighborhood that a rezone was required in the public
interest.
The remaining quoted paragraph indicates that there has
been no apartment development since 1959 when the prop-
erty was rezoned to RM 800. This statement ignores Park-
ridge's efforts since 1966 when it began assembling lots for
the purpose of constructing an apartment building.
[3] We agree that the current views of the community
urging rezone to single-family use may be given substantial
weight in matters of this nature. They cannot, however, be
controlling absent compelling reasons requiring a rezone for
the public health, safety, morals or general welfare. See
Otfner Elecs., Inc. v. Gerhardt, 398 Ill. 265, 76 N.E.2d 27
(1947).
•Jan. 1978 PARKRIDGE v.S LE
463
89 Wn.2d 454
In considering the evidence, we note that (1) there is no
presumption of validity favoring the action of rezoning;
(2) the proponents of the rezone have the burden of proof
in demonstrating that conditions have substantially
changed since the original zoning, or as in this case, the
1959 amendment thereto; and (3) the rezone must bear a
substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals
or welfare. We, as did the trial court, find the evidence in
this matter insufficient to support the rezone. Since the
City did not carry the burden of demonstrating such a
change in this neighborhood as would justify a rezone for
the public health, safety, morals or general welfare, we
affirm the holding below that the rezone was void.
We also emphasize another justification mentioned by
the trial court in its oral opinion. The court said, "[t]he city
is required to present a verbatim record of adjudicatory
zoning procedures in order to permit the parties to have a
full and complete review. This was not done and it should
have been done in line with the Kitsap County case."
Barrie v. Kitsap County, 84 Wn.2d 579, 527 P.2d 1377
(1974). We agree. The writ of certiorari requites the same.
The writ of review must command the party to whom
it is directed to certify fully to the court issuing the writ
at a specified time and place, a transcript of the record
and proceedings (describing or referring to them with
convenient certainty), that the same may be reviewed by
the court . . .
RCW 7.16.070. See Beach v. Board of Adjustment, 73
Wn.2d 343, 438 P.2d 617 (1968).
Fleming v. Tacoma, supra, distinguishes between the
legislative function of enacting the initial comprehensive
plan and zoning ordinance and the basically adjudicatory
function of subsequent rezonings. We said at page 299:
The process by which they are made, subsequent to the
adoption of a comprehensive plan and a zoning code, is
basically adjudicatory.
Generally, when a municipal legislative body enacts a
comprehensive plan and zoning code it acts in a policy
making capacity. But in amending a zoning code, or
•
• 464 PARKRIDGE v.•TPLE Jan.1978
89 Wn2d 454
•
reclassifying land thereunder, the same body, in effect,
makes an adjudication between the rights sought o by the
the
proponents and those claimed by the opponents
zoning change. The parties whose interests are affected
are readily identifiable. Although important questions of
public policy may permeate a zoning amendment, the
• decision has a far greater impact on one group of citizens
than on the public generally.
In Barrie we expanded upon Fleming. After observing
that a complete record is always important, we noted that
'the necessity of an adequate record is especially acute
when the court is called upon to review adjudicatory pro-
ceedings.' Barrie v. Kitsap County, supra at 586. We went
on to hold at page 587 that in order to assure parties to
rezone proceedings a full and complete judicial review, a
verbatim record of such proceedings is required.
[4] We reiterate the requirement of a verbatim record of
rezone proceedings as mandated in Barrie. Henceforth, we
also require, founded upon and supported by the record,
that findings of fact be made and conclusions or reasons
based thereon be given for the action taken by the deciding
entity (in this case, the city council).
Turning now to the "vested rights case', the City con-
tends that no vested right has been preserved because,
(1) the application was inadequate to establish such a
right; or (2) the application was not pursued with due dili-
gence and any vested right obtained by filing the applica-
tion had been lost. The trial court concluded otherwise.
[5] Contra to the 'rezone case' which was considered by
the trial court primarily on the return and amended return
to the writ of certiorari, the "vested rights case" was tried
with live witnesses before the court as a conventional trial.
Here, the trial court heard and saw the witnesses. The rule
is that if there is substantial evidence to support the trial
court's findings, we will not substitute our judgment for the
court's even though, had we been the trier of fact in the
first instance, our judgment might have been different.
Zillah Feed Yards, Inc. v. Carlisle, 72 Wn.2d 240, 246, 432
P.2d 650 (1967).
•
Jan.1978 PARKRIDGE v.II TILE 465
89 Wn2d 454
[6] This state's rule regarding the vesting of rights in
cases of this kind was stated in Hull v. Hunt, 53 Wn.2d 125,
130, 331 P.2d 856 (1958), where we said:
[W]e prefer to have a date certain upon which the right
vests to construct in accordance with the building permit.
We prefer not to adopt a rule which forces the court to
search through (to quote from State ex rel. Ogden v.
Bellevue, [45 Wn.2d 492, 275 P.2d 899 (1954)]) "the
moves and countermoves of . . . parties . . by way of
passing ordinances and bringing actions ,for injunc-
tions"—to which may be added the stalling or accelera-
tion of administrative action in the issuance of permits—
to find that date upon which the substantial change of
position is made which finally vests the right. The more
practical rule to administer, we feel, is that the right
vests when the party, property owner or not, applies for
his building permit, if that permit is thereafter issued.
This rule, of course, assumes that the permit applied for
and granted be consistent with the zoning ordinances and
building codes in force at the time of application for the
permit.
The application filed by Parkridge in February 1974, was
consistent with the ordinances effective on that date. The
City's argument is that Parkridge does not have a vested
right because of the delays in processing its application.
The trial court recognized that more than the filing of an
application for a building permit was required under the
building code to protect the applicant from a subsequent
zoning change. The court made specific findings as to Park- -
ridge's diligence in its efforts and the frustration of these
efforts by the City. The City contends the findings are not
supported by the record and should be rejected by this
court.
We are satisfied that in the context of this case, sufficient
evidence exists to support the trial court's findings. Sche-
matic drawings indicating a 60—unit apartment building
were submitted at the time of application for the permit,
Over a period of 2 or more days in August, the drawings
were checked and the discussion between Mr. Green of the
city building department and Mr. Dudley, Parkridge's
��pt�p�ly�
466PARXRIDGE tATTLE an.1978
89 Wnad'454
architect, took place. These events resulted in changes in
design, reduction from 60 units to 50, and modification of
access between the street and the parking area. These
changes were incorporated in revised drawings after discus-
sions were held between Mr. Dudley and the traffic engi-
neer, or members of his office. Parkridge, through its
attorney, notified the City of its acceptance of the revisions
and its cognizance that changes were required in drawings
and assemblage of environmental data. -
Mr. Dudley testified that more detailed plans of the
apartment building were ready to be presented to the City
in September or October. These more detailed plans were
given to Mr. Rupeiks for use in completing the environ-
mental assessment, but the letter canceling the permit
application was received before Parkridge was able to
deliver the plans to the City. Mr. Rupeiks testified that he
and his associates had devoted 129 hours of time to envi-
ronmental assessment in November and 76 hours in
December. A geological soil study was started in September
and completed sometime in the late fall. An acoustical
engineer, who had not been available earlier, consulted with
Parkridge in December and agreed to do a study on the
project.
We find the above to be substantial evidence supportive
of the trial court's findings that Parkridge was diligent in
its efforts and that the City had frustrated those efforts.
We agree with the trial court that the City should be
required to process Parkridge's building permit application
promptly,diligently and in good faith.
[7] The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 and the
other statutes and ordinances administered by the building
department serve legitimate functions, none of which is
intended for use by a governmental agency to block the
construction of projects, merely because they are unpopu-
lar. We make this statement in light of the history of this
matter and because the building permit application will be
before the building department for further processing.
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECEIVED
!r///
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER . JUN 1 31978
AM PM
PUBLIC HEARING 71819110111112111213141516
JUNE 13, 1978
EXHIBIT NO.
APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON ITEM NO. /r- /31: 71
FILE NUMBER: R-178-78, REZONE
A. SUMMARY:
Applicant initiated a rezone from R-3 District, Medium Density Multi-Family to
R-1 , Single Family District.
B. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1 . Owner of Record: Transamerica Development Company
Puget Western, Inc.
Mary Tyrrel
2. Applicant: City of Renton
3. Location: Property is on the west side of Renton Hill
south of South 7th Street; east of FAI-405;
north of the Puget Sound Power and Light
Company transmission line easement and east
of the subdivided property. See Exhibits
B-1 , 6-2 (not included in this report) , B-3
(not included in this report) , and B-4 (not
included in this report).
4. Legal Description: Detailed legal descriptions are available on
file in the Renton Planning Department.
5. Size of Properties: The parcels total ± 12.1 acres.
6. Access: Primarily via Cedar Avenue South with less
access available on Renton Avenue South, Grant
Avenue South, High Avenue South, and Jones
Avenue South.
7. Existing Zoning: R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential
District.
8. Existing Zoning in Area: R-1 , Single Family Residential District and
R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential.
District
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single Family.
10. Notification: The property owners were notified in writing
of the hearing date. Notice was properly
published in the Record Chronicle and posted
in three places on or near the site as required
by City Ordinance.
C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
The rezone was initiated to review the existing zoning in relation with the
Comprehensive Plan.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
I PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78
JUNE 13, 1978
i PAGE TWO
D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND:
The subject site was annexed by Ordinance Number 1547 in May, 1956.
E: PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Geology - See Exhibit E-1
Ground Moraine
Characterisitc Artificial Fill Renton Formation Deposits
Special Feature - - - Partly cemented, Intimately graded
but contains mixture of clay to
uncemented beds. gravel sizes.
Drainage Highly variable. Runoff excellent. Runoff variable.
Foundation
Stability Highly variable. Excellent, but Excellent.
subject to
limitations of
slope.
Slope
Stability Highly variable. Stands for long Stands in steep
periods in steep natural and cutslopes
natural and for long periods.
artificial cuts.
Dip of beds may
affect slope
stability.
Seismic
Stability Very poor. Good. Good.
Information Source: Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County,
Washington by D.R. Mullineaux (Map GQ-405).
Renton Hill is underlain with coal deposits, much of which have been mined out. The
remaining deposits are considered marginal quality and are usually in thin, twisted
beds at great depths. It is not economically feasible to mine this coal at the present
time due to a variety of reasons. Although it is possible that the coal could be mined
somedayas energydemands increase, technology, feasibility, and political
economic p
realities would have to be taken into consideration. There are approximately 50 million
tons of reserve coal in the Renton Coal Field, of which Renton Hill is a portion.
The mined-out coal beds are under most of the area except in the southwestern
corner (contiguous to FAI-405). These mined-out coal beds are approximately
150 feet below the surface of Renton Hill . The southwestern . corner is probably
underlain by unmined coal . (Source: Map showing nonmetallic mineral resources
in part of West-Central King County Washington by William Rice; Map I-852-D. )
See Exhibit E-2 for illustration of coal beds.
A few years ago there was subsidence of a street in front of 611 Renton Avenue
South undoubtedly due to the collapse of an abandonded coal mine shaft. Several
truck loads of material over a period of time was required to fill the shaft.
The rate of subsidence has declined substantially and periodic resurfacing of
the street is necessary to fill the depression. See red dot on Exhibit B-2 for
location of subsidence.
2. Topography: This site has moderate to very steep slopes. The northerly portion
has slopes 30% and greater; the center portion has slopes ranging from 17 to
20%; and the extreme southerly portion has a 10% slope. See Exhibit E-3 for
slopes. .
r. .
. ,
: • . ___ . .. _. .
. .
, . .
. EXHIBIT E -I ..
• • , •
GEOLOGY. . ,
• , .
. ,
• ••••• ix • •• •••01
. • I • , eIt • • • .
. .. ... . ,
. P 4-yei 1,... (Ali • :!: ::*
0 ?I,liffi .4 Vr:11.',••{1 e- 4
• • ••• • . 4 ••s • .
• • Pi ..fi. Stf ,r.:y r dr Is: !!.., : 43 LE6END
.`ir • 1:24, I ' '14:
:
. 0 it -v4E:I ! +3/ i : ........... ••• ••• 1.•• ' ' •
. . i" 0‘ t • :CI •„AA_ o 4, •
4. , •... J. .iV ' 1,,,,, : r., a r ' Ae...I At,itilyr 4
e•
' hirdtlaellall• •OtifOrip. !izoiiiii.. • ••••••••• i:i:K::::.::::::: A yei-4 tcia i
, • a LP at.•......•-• • - ••4 ,,...........A.:.
7,1 . .. •,,, . • ,
I ",141W-- •4. 11 • • :: ::::: Fal
a- .""..:I*: .•• • . .
. • Moe., i . 1110r, *di
,0 Ar bt ti. .f.,•lie•• •
, .
- .4. . s.% 1.i.i ,. •• •8 ..:: tr!i! ••
t• Q . . .
.. •
. ,
. . ' •4.k iC o.* ig.ii::i:i::i'i•-:/:i.'.i:/•.1 P':.ECgE1iie::i.il::A:i.:.i.n:.:s.jv..1J)';tj.,Vp.lj.e'414 1-3
/..1e,l'0"Arl ti,,i)'4 r,p I)•:•••4.•4.'••,1O•..1.?i••01l,,p..••••',kwIe••_,.., ::!:•••„,.:•i.::4
•:
D....i
? J 4 0
r 1l li
6 ••° ....................
..,:.i,H.1.i.4..ii,.:...ii i;1:.'1.•Igi,nI,0.7..,z..7L I1 7.T 1..
..........•....•...?......0cI1.I.IrP.•::,:iA.!-::::i..%:.!
f.......•.A•••i.•-!-k•.1,k
•-•,''S,,•
z'•k•_i
•t,;./Fra4,,‘
„t,.1 e.4;dhid
) : 01" .; *) 6.7 ......
J , )) 01 a
z ,! ••••••••••••go 2.—
i.
•
........r"...1i...... , ..::.:...:..:.:.:1:J:..-...0.„..l:. •e:/e/ zIsil ci,.4, '•••,•••••,•••••••••,•••.••••„• ••••. y•0'u1•4p••.,f•4••1••44•47••j.•ii-md•2o••••• •11.,•,'o•••_•6•_••.•.• •••o•••• f•LCN•••o•••.p• 'i:t:'I.ff.D.i.,.: .4';;ii.i
8DR.
e4rlo't.c,
••• • •• siva•;im • •two al• • • •.I. :
. .f 'cur,' REAtT6N IfILL Ralewers
.........". .........qi , lieillh _.- ...0••••••••• : 7• ;6.61 19.•••••••• 6911. T:'
— — fffsisr_t . ,
•••••••• •• •, '''"-. •lits'••••- 7470144 ••••••• ••• t. ••• awl1444 • . Ras'ass^PL.. • I ti-t.• '
....1
. . s•-.... it pp, . . p• •••• • T1. . aO.C1"4C ; ..'
lily.-1-••••...•••
•011'111L1'
NORTH
. • fri.Ap G 41 44CeS . . .' •,
. . .
. .
, . .
EXN181T
, • .
• . .
, •
. •
- Air IN,ED Ou7- COAL BEDS
• . .
. .
• . .
. •
• . ,
. , .
, . •
. . .
•. . •
. . .
. •
. . .
. . ., • . . ,
. .. . . ., .., .
, . . . .
, . .• • „ • .
, ..
.. . . . .. .
4 . • 6iii . •••••••• •:44.41.4 :•• .4...• a, • •..e...••••• .
.... • ••• •••••• ecipi•••§414
pi) • •••• ••• ••• ••••••II. • •liti: 0. 4144•11-4,igle3
• •• ••• •••••• ,o•11,•••••,41 •,•,•• • •••• LE6END
. . I .. . D• ••ei 0,•„• •••• • ••••••••• • ire' • • leo ••#.
....• ••• •• .••••• •ft3•••••• •••• •
. •. ,
. .
• ' •• ••••11 • ••••••• '" • ••••A• • 6•• a •
. .i..._•.....
• i. ••••••• • 4‘..,•••,,,, ••El . .
0 AlkAhm..mm . w 0• •MALMILALLIII.• •• ' . • . ,
•• ••••••••.•••.••••••ept.?•45444•••••••••••••••••••••••,•• , - ..
•,' .. • ,• 0.111i10•0-g.• Wilia.,••• • • dIKAM A 00 . , , I
• • •••••• ••464,•-•i•e oseipe . e• A ••• • IR, 140%44 •••••• i„,_ j..614t
Dip ••••••• 1 041-6114111• • O •• • A , •tb • leb•di • 1,11••••6 ( 11•••••1
. '
. 0 ••••••• e••...••4•• Si• ••,,,p•• 60• I*• t • ., .• ••0141 4_•_•••••••
. Ai, ••••••• •••••••••••• CP••1.1••• • ••• •• • . •••• • "" I e04 1 8idS
, • •••• •• ••••• ••44.•••• ;••••• ••• )46040 .• ••• •• •I •••••• --
' 4 • ••••••• •400)0004,0• •*• A • 1110•I • •• S 0,00
• 0 • ••••••• 444111••; •••-••••• oh,r • ••• •• • L•4) •co, 4
.
• .4.. I • ••••••• dii••••••••• ••••••-• • •••I •••• • •. ••• • ,
• ••••••• • i•••••••4134•4•121boe••Vg•• ••• ,Obsts a . " • •
6 •••••••
t sut04,••••• •••4144 _ • ..,••I • • • ••• •
, 4 • •••••• 0••••••••63 • •..IisJ • 7 4 .•4.0 • "Cie •
, •••• - e_••••••••44 ••••• • •••I •,e4o •• •• As
I?, 10e 0e0.0.0••• ser5•5541- 54
' !Z' ' •- .
11, / ' I . ,•
•••••• 66..•X. e . . I •",°• We•.e. '••NW
. 4 ••••••• re4• IW. •., . . .
•••••• 1 : ::::` ::••• T* ‘ 4 •• :1
L • •••••• 0 : :: ;I*, * ••46
•••• t0•• g11•4•/ LI • M• ••:
t •••• • A• •A• e• •
• ,•
•
, • 0. (I f44•44••••44444 . ST.4.
v. •••.•••••••••• • • ........4•'•• ' •
. ,
• 611 ••••••••••• • i ro VIN. .V4:. .47‘'es •l' • ( . •....,,,if . ••••••••••• • 1
tr.'"'• . C.
. A ...••••••• • jo•••••• ••• I •• . ••.• ••
• Z ••••••••• • ••••01:•• ••• ••• . ••• •ci I • -
• ,
. ' r V
11 • •••••••• • ••••••• ••• I •• s ••• oases .
%. 11. •••••••••• • frlofiolgoip, ••Epi •,, •••.ar
. •••••••• • •••••••-• ros•61 so • 3 o o ,
• ., •••••••• • . 4•e• • ••• •••• • ••.••••• o ••
,
..1,. :: , 7 7. 'L - ., :, lit, •••••• : •• ... ..i)•,11310, J I IP' • ] i- .1% . • .R. • " •••,. • . ..
•: . . ., 46. ••••• • • • •••• • •••• o Etcroat rtig.L, Kt/44,s
..eltb•L • ilikok •644 4(
', ).:. •,.,,:', .,:„ . ., - • , I, r's...,j, ' 44./ • .64•• 4.••••••• • • • I 6 ••• ••• v. ' &me/
t:.:!;.' .::.- : , , • '. • , ...,,..,: -:: 11........... .• .114441,41° . • •••••••• ••• I•••, • ••, IL•ir .1 L
(446.4....1)1.6..tim beiiii. ,• . .
,,;-::,._ :L.,:,,,. ...,, .. ,.; ., •,...,:. . , ,,.,,,,,s,,,.,.... ,,, . T ....„.... •...„.....1.4.... ••••
•••••ab• • •OE, : 0 0.0 ww•i•
' i '''' -HL5` ' '...:''''::, •••''' ." •L''• ..‘44;,••,Nek*o.....*:,'"•••••••00,•• ' •• . ' .
i- :t.''' ''' - 434,4:oc-ie." • •• , -,_-4etisma,-,44,-4.t...••.,.•••••• 'iiiir -.' •
, , • • • . ',' -,.• " , ,•-• • --,A4-4,7„04e..._ ,..•oeithao.....,•• • ••••••••••0111
,_' ',.:....,,,'"•,, ,,..-‘ .. •;:: . .',,, . . . ' -,..., 4.4q.---f,.:106,••••••••••eiiie•••••••••••••••46 • • '
,,414:-5-,;‘,.,,,'.5::- • ,,:,,,,, ,,, - •,, , . ,., . .""*....a.,:.,'; , '',.....i.,,,•••••••••••,••••••••••••••••,..!. L., L.. ' • NORTH . • . ' '' .
.,..:.i,•::,...:•..,:'.-;:..,.,. '...', . =........, -,-, --•------.0.0=rirenro•tkvire,4,•,4.4,----, ,.,,. ,-::- . •
,,, • : .. „ .,. , , , ,"
'.:•,,,,,,.:, .,,.....,. ,',.„:,,, :',-.,;.',.'-.1 '..!'::...'.'..'..° ':' •,.. ,.,.. .!..,,.:,7; • - ,-...., '. r,. '.' . ,'.. ' .''''''.:-:.'..' • ''....,.:..::r.. ' ":.. • ' ' ''.L '': . .'I:''' . I,
,..i:V.1:,':ii::::,,,,::',,.'•'''' !?L,,'!.!!''1.. ':.:'.. 1,''''L'i,'''''.':,1'':'!:.r!,',.: ', ::.•..',i 1, .:', :''':'.:'•' ., :'.' '' ' '' .:'..'.,.'. ''0 Y.:'''''''' ..:'.l'..':'''''..:i I.;'.." '''''' .' *:'' . ' ''''': .. ' . ' '
),'1;,,,';':1,',:::':/,'{::,.:,,,:':1 .!:ilf:''k',,.''''.1.!:,,:,•' ,'::..:,:':''.:.'i?''':r':.'''',.Z.':i ',,"I':: ''''''',::1:.,''''::::.‘::2',.(1.;:',';,:..‘i''L '‘,''„,•:.'q:'(,;',.'',.'.''S 1...: •.):': '',',.. i •:.:•:'/;:4'._. ''....',.l.".;::..'.:0'•,'.',:','':''''''',', .'.:,..:•',.. 'S.', , .,.', .,I. ,,i:',, ' ... .. ., ,,,r
:'.4?.'17•':'':r;„:4':!.:„:::.:'',':'.':1':'' ''..:"':'''''',,:''''''''.:!':::1'':i'.:i f''';'.,. .',.6,:.',:1::;',0'.:.',.i''1:,: :.::.';':': ' ''' . ' •'' ' ' •.•''' '''''''.'^''.'..';'.•:,r''2.:1::.:1: ;',..':: .: ''.:','' .•• .. •'• f' , •rl, .. . , r.,'::. ,
• •
,''.''. :',',4:''..:."2.,:',' r),!:''f C.: ','',.‘',.', ','''.; '.,t;.!',*'''''t 1'''.'•..4;.1::' ,,'.'11:',.',..../,:::"J:.'',..,%'II.c.1,1:4',,.i.j,':' :‘'.: ''4::',' ''''.. ' .. : ', ', '' ''• ,..'.';':. .:' ',I.•;':i •',,A!,,.... •..' .. , .. . . ,', ', ‘: .!,. I,
. ,.
. ..•
. . . i .
, I 1 I _) A I(
• I ; s.v1, . ) L±-__I_LA _ ) k --- i'•:
; f'
' il ' \- • • 1 'Ik4r1 1 , 2,1%
,.. X li i X 3$7 7 , T H -338 X AVE REtcc-hi YILL ;cc el: :--• ' "s----- .
/ 1, 1 r I frntse- ' 'N37t
111 1
. ., I
1 ' DO I a i 1 II tl 1E) I I 0 II R.-4.-Pf,..,,,,.t. fri, (rj.j\jc
. 101.1 1 ., L, : , ! . 1, 1 _ ,
11 . 1 II 11 .
11 II
, , ii i . . 1. 1_ r_L_Ln. . .7 1 , \ 1 1: II -
dift • ....ai :,
ia ' • I I' , ,
, , • ; ,; ,
i
, , i 1 1
f . 1
f .
' I
1 . ' I :
, I ,
. ' 1
•
. •
,
,
\ 1 I I
)
I :\ L-73, '
I I \
\ '. \ 3 0% I 1 I
l' iiir
1 1
, II -1-7j , I I 0 /T1
lu'l
il NORTH
I
- • . I -I . .
U(/ 111 / •I --? _. 0 I i . • L. _I 1 I• ,--. .
. ,..c.,.. / / i S 1 _J .: I, ( i j .. . : li ( i____\_, - ., !! ' • \ 1 - i'i d 1._-; QD . 1 Y D
(---irvi . i- ; ( (0 I J I ,., .ic—i
o ik 411 ii \ 1111 : 1 ) I i r . )1 .
II 1 j li [Lil x ritT1 ' r
. I I I 1,:
• (- . ij\-/ 1 ' . , , 1 I
1----• I _ II 1 1 1 . 1. i . ,f
,
l? 1 1
. ''' • II Iwii Li
- D 'i 1 n 11 1 1 0 • . 1 L .
\ ,,,,,,E. :::, . /„..,.x ..• . ,
. ,
1431 i?1-i i .. .// , "Th; . / ; . ,r) .•• ..
.... , i . • \ ii C3 I'll 0 ol ,1 /=,-.•. ..,-.:-, .
.
iu 1 .
, .4 ."--r.. A .
1 I•: / I 0 I •. : :,.
' / ' . 1, .. • I, I 1(A I I=3 0
, • i' \ li ° 0 1
> I.7(:..../‘ 02'2): / \ ',..,• N. i ,• F-I V/ 0 •, [11 - - it=i •Thil 1-1 . •• • .0 ti , i, .:,_ -•,...
1 i
. 1
e_:___ .... • 3011 . ! i ±ik o' \ LA ce
,0 I M. !I
0. 1\_ me, or; 3,AY . Ili ' ic I. -,4„\,. . 1/
- • , \-- 1 , .
,
_ _ 1 , • ,
en .
T : \\ _ h )4_ -_ . \_,,- 17-1--in-----/-
, • .;
363 K A --E--'-- -----"'.1 ' ' - • -'
/. • ., k i .. it Mg , ' =1 -
' 1 \i / ---+ \ - • /( ,, . ' / \ V
/
\ • I , / kt I I
I ' ,I I 1• DI.1 ) ) 1111:1E3 1 . I' L7:1 nil I-.
1 I -
IL Clo ., / ,,,7--s-''X , .. ..• . .'\\ '‘.‘ . IX
& ! 1
• ' N.- , k \ ,1—...1,. ...,.. __ 1 1 J ..
q / / • ' .' .' i .... TZ) ",..111.1.11/.. Allah._ 1 y% 1S3 ,\ ; j . \ I I .\. I I MD • •I I ' 1 \ •
()a ••%1 1 • 1...1 0 CP VO,1/4„...7 . , 1 ' \ '‘, i , Nii4. ' I IT:5 , ',i I . , 1 1,4). 0 1 ' \ I I ' .. ',.. 0,0 .)1 1 1 ; 1 1 i ( ' • \-
.. /.. . /7 ; • \- " --- -----7 il ' 1 I. ,
( ' 7--),'. I Aso _ ',:'• . . .:..I I , . • I \III ' 1 I ' •
li • --..- -- --
) .. )/- ' II
-- . - T• _
. -
.( -.' •, (.7 '\ '
I i '
•
/ i
. '
I • , \\ -)22 ,..„iri. 1 . :1 - --
•.
- - - - - _•)4„,. t....
,, ,. ) .,,. - ,...
/ 1 t ( --....,, 111 - k
• 1 i (' '
' I I \ ' X; \ 1 1
i X 1 I i . • -
z,-. I 1.1 . • . . . -
) \ ) ,. - • II L, -__Lt6 . ° ' " - ---::-:-- ''-
•
• . .
, , \ \ , II , , w ,____x x ), -11 - • _. .
•
i „ - „, -,. ,, , • .
r, • / \. 1-- !,\ • \:•'''\-
/40•74- ------=---------- -: - ' . ••• -,.. ..-' • '
-. '/.. - - 11.11111 .. . ; mi "‘• -- . - • . •,--f-- --• ••--
.
7 , ,
(
\ . •
EV '-•,\*\ . . N434s ' \ . •-• -.. t / 1 - - ' -
•-i_
1 • . t i , 4 • •
i• • . f•:--.: •-
,
\ • , 41.‘', s\ I I .
/ \\ -- .‘\\\ • - -...,
. ,
• -. ..1_,/ ... . \- * c -.".\, I . - • . , .-: -
c, I - 7 L z-_ -_-_-.....:_ • \ I ' i 5` 1 ) 4 -1.
• / . l'-• i 1: — --t ‘7" ——--k:—
'..- I , 1 \• t \_ 1 .,
.. -
• j‘ 1.\ \ . .1-'''....,,,,.......\,,' .11_4 --..-1.; ..—.•—..---.---- ) ,...., • ' '. :I 4 Ill:i.‘ .. . '.- .;,_.:ve,-- :="'-% -:.
S .‘ ' —.---• -•4"- 7:4 4 4 : " 1- .--'- ..-:
.e:t . I, X 179 1 ' ) 1 ' •
_ - -- --
. _
•
. - . •
PLANNING DEPARTMENT '
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE THREE
3. Soils: The site has four soil classifications which are illustrated on
Exhibit E-4. The northerly most portion is Beausite gravely sandy loam,
15 to 30% slopes (BeD); foundations for low buildings is considered severe.
In the south western corner is Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep (AkF) ;
foundations for low buildings is considered_severe with moderate and severe
slippage potential . A small portion of the site by Grant Avenue South has
Arents, Everett soil (An) ; the hazard for foundations to low buildings is
slight to none. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15% slopes (AgC)
occupies the south easterly portion of the site; this soil has moderate
limitations for foundations of low buildings and a seasonal high water
table. Considerable erosion has occured on property (multi-family) to the
north of the site which apparently does not adequately control surface
drainage.
4. Vegetation: The site has alder, maple and willow trees with blackberry,
ferns, hazel and ivy for shrubs and ground cover. The vegetation is con-
sidered abundant except where the land has been clearcut for an apparent
road west of and parallel to Cedar Avenue.
5. Wildlife: Due to the surrounding development, the site would be suitable
for only small birds and mammals,.
6. Water: There are two seasonal drainage ditches on the site. Both appear
to have their primary sources of water east of the site from developed
single family areas.
7. Land Use: FAI-405 lies to the west and lower in elevation than the site.
A Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line right-of-way is
contiguous to the south. Established single family dwellings lie to the
east of the site. To the north of the site are apartments and condominiums.
F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS:
Renton Hill was subdivided and developed prior to the turn of the century.
When it was developed and for many years. thereafter, it was considered one of
the nicer areas in which .to live. This was due in part to being above the
flood plain, having a view, . being at a higher elevation than industrial
activities, and a variety of other reasons.
Over a period of years the Hill began to decline. However, this trend has
reversed itself in recent years. Some homes were converted to apartments and
new apartments were constructed. During the early 1960's, FAI-405 was constructed
leaving only one access to Renton Hill .
.In 1953 the'City adopted a zoning ordinance which tended to segregate the single
and multi-family residences on the Hill . This helped contain multi-family to
Mill Avenue (along FAI-405) and minimize the spread of multi-family throughout the
Hill . During the early 1970' s a sense of community pride began to redevelope
which lead to cohesive community action. Eventually, a community club was
formed to represent Renton Hill .
The City of Renton and the residents of Renton Hill have invested considerable
amounts of money in the area since January 1976. Cedar Street between South 3rd
Street and South 9th Street was completely rebuilt with a new street, curbs,
gutters, sidewalks, illumination and overhead utilities were placed underground.
The project cost $200,162.04, .of which the residents paid $43,310.11 through a
local improvement district (LID 293). Sixty nine parcels participated in the LID
which calculates to an average of $627.68 per parcel .
Since January 1976 considerable private investment has taken place on Renton Hill
including 5 new single family dwellings; one new addition to single family residence;
one new story on single family residence; two new private garages; one lowered base-
ment; and a new eight unit apartment. The new homes were 'erected on lots that were. ,
due either to demolition of a home, never had been developed, or were short plated
from a larger. lot.
f •}{
' a F"•
HIHON
'd�q 1S NJ 1!'l - K�•e•Y,h `-1 4 •,`
r°;."id•' 'Gy 0,4,l Val v ,�A'b A,i
••f. Y \ iti' .\
Saw r,y 7710 NQJ.N3J n IJ •Iii„i F �Ig1/ i \ .+
❑ A 0 CZ, O 0 Cr p 0 \ ''i
•15' Mlb S. :1 a ••
CI1
O
O II ❑
% CJ
Q a 0 O' A o © .4a ��
p D 9 0 ® i o
-44.747 S CIA Iry a t Q 0 0 h..
w»os a.hayer,
D fl 0o 0 a o ,
swoi.r '7v7 Z
,:ts K[L S
\-, 0❑ 0 c1 ❑ d po O oN 3 9 91 �' 0 0 0 0 ,. s .
oODp ' �0 • oo a �,
s_tiy l,f3wnsd3•W aNriOS
/—H jlgfHX3
oOO n .r
��.OnOOOCnrno0000ns , f Anrrnrrr
C n r. f`r r r. n' C
cx' o r r n n o a n r• n n
oo°oeorn°e°aeoeoer;'•r,r,nr c r. ,'n..,, r
o n r o e r r r n c',.,-,rr nrnrcr' 1%.1
ic»eneernnr�,eoc'oc ,„r•rrcn,, ncr.r,cno 1 AVn' `!+!\
c000°rronrrp r•e• n- - nr,n•' J�.'.J, Y� ',yb/ - Y \
•}11�Ca!r..ld ..f.wt awe (ill �"l� ,' bi Z�tr.• yJJ�Ji '�';;:•:•:•::::::}%}
7-Asyut)
Siwor9� 771H No1N3� 0 , ••1rLyi .6 i1 ! '• —
u t % '`
, Q ,:;: {: :;;:::::.::...; . �1
1
r
•
43 \flo
• i❑ O1• irr •a4 4r 4 , h
1 a $ VcC�
r
d )41 y wig."..1?.1.*:/:-:ie.%...:i..:;e:i..?...*/.•/..%..i:..:.::i..:.:...:.*.•.Y:.' Ci 00 (5° . 2'1.":i:.%..:•I-:.i:.i:.it:.:.":.:A::.M:.i.:..n:.:...::a„.?U....:..::,i:.i..:ii:.iM:...:.%..i.i...:.Ii:.::..::.:::...:::::.::...i;..:..n.i.........,i..i.:.:.ffi...i...:.....::...g.::..:.::::...:..:i•.i„:.::.:.:.:::I:.::-:..g..:.:..i..v.::..:.F.:.:1..4•.'.:.....,*...X:..;............:..:i".:..:.D.:.::.;::..:vn::::..:v.:::'.,a:..
h
•
J'r 1
3'
d
0
•r
dr. 3*,. Z
Q
I
.J
h r
Y
1
'•3 rr.:•. l 5
-r
r
•
.Da �: •r: ir
1
❑ v� 1rr'j -
C.
^ N OOOeO Ce
OoOO OOrOCO
A
0
ti •
•c•
C
ti
Jo
S 7 I 0 S
,% .g II g w fl X,'
I?LANNING.DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEAF 1 EXAMINER
, PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF ktNuON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZ(,I.L •
JUNE 13, 1978 .
PAGE FOUR
Two short plats (tWo lots each) and one preliminary Planned Unit Development .
applications were received by the City from Renton Hill since 1976. In addition,
a large tentative plat (2.45 acres, 93 lots) application was received on a parcel
south of and contiguous to Renton Hill ; this subdivision does not propose to
have access via Renton Hill .
Effective July 1 , 1978 low and moderate home owners will be eligible for
grants up to $2,500 for rehabilitation of their detached single family
dwellings through the City of Renton Housing Repair Program: Renton Hill
is designated as one of the City's target neighborhoods.
G. TRAFFIC:
• Renton-Hill is essentially a large cul-de-sac with one access, Mill Avenue
South. The Seattle Cedar River Pipeline right-of-way provides a secondary
. access for emergency vehicles. This facilitiy was closed in 1973 at the
request of the residents of the Hill to eliminate the through traffic that
came. to and from the Cascade area to the south. The residents of Renton Hill
considered the through traffic inappropriate and dangerous to the community.
The streets are rather steep and serious questions can be raised concerning
traffic safety if too many cars use the streets. Between South 3rd and. 7th
Streets, Renton Avenue and Cedar Avenue average 9.2% and 7.7% slope respectively.
• Renton Avenue has a short stretch that has a grade in excess of 15% between the
same streets. With the grid iron street pattern, a vehicle (and anything which
• the vehicle might hit) can be in serious trouble should a serious mechanical
problem occur such as brake. failure.
On January 22, 1978 traffic counts were conducted and found movement of 2,650 •
•
vehicles during a 2.4-hour period. This represents 1 ,350 vehicles entering and
. leaving the Hill each day.
Burlington Northern Railroad has a major east-west track accross Mill Avenue
• South, the sole access to Renton Hill . During the 16 hours per day that the
Renton railroad station is manned, there is an average of 14 trains that pass
. through the city. .This does not include the numerous short blockages due to
switching activities. . Blockage of Mill Avenue can be critical should an
emergency occur on Renton Hill while a train crosses Mill Avenue.
H. SOUND:
Sound readings were taken in mid May 1978 at six locations on or near the site
as illustrated ih Exhibit H-1 . The detailed sound records are available on file
in the Renton Planning Department. The freeway is the .major source of sound at
the western side of the site while airplanes, dogs, the city park, and other urban
sources were more important as the loud-sound generators at the. eastern extremity.
Even at the eastern end, the freeway provided audible background sounds through-
out the site. Listed below is a synopsis of the findings:
dBA LEVELS
Site High Averages Low
1 79 76 - 65 63
2 66 ' 62 - 59 56
3 73 61 - 58 55
4 68 54 - 53 52
5 • 59 55 - 52 51
6 61 56 - 44 44
Generally, the closer to FAI-405, the greater the sound. It is anticipated that
traffic will increase as growth occurs .in South King County on FAI-405 and therefore
.the sound levels on Renton Hill will increase also. Sleep interference occurs at
40 dBA; speech interference at 55 dBA; hearing loss with continuous exposure at
80 dBA, although some experts believe hearing loss happens at. a lower level. As .
indicated by the above data, there is speech interference with outside activities
during the day and a potential loss of hearing if exposed for a long period of time.
•
{y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEAkiNG EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78,REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE FIVE
•
Sound inside a dwelling is generally 15 to 20 dBA less when the windows are
open and 20 to 25 dBA quieter when the windows are closed. Dwellings con-
structed on the site could experience 'sound levels that will cause interference
with normal conversation and perhaps sleep.
I. PUBLIC SERVICES:
1 . Water and Sewer: There are existing 4 inch water mains located in Cedar and
Renton Avenue South and South 10th Street. An 8 inch water main is located
in South 9th and llth Streets. An 18 inch sanitary sewer line is located in
the Puget Sound transmission line right-of-way that could serve the site.
2. Fire Protection: Fire protection is provided by the Renton Fire Department
as per ordinance requirements. Any future development Of the site will be
subject to the City of Renton standards.
•
3. Transit: ' Metro provides bus . service along the periphery of Renton Hill .
Metro Transit route numbers 107 and 240 operate north of the hill on Mill
Avenue South. Bronson Way South is served by, bus route number 142 and route
number 155 "serves Main Avenue South. All of these busses are within walking
distance of Renton Hill .'
4. Schools: Renton Hill is served via school bus by the Bryn Mawr Elementary
• School , and Dimmitt Junior High. School . Renton High School serves Renton
Hill .
5. Parks: Phillip Arnold Park, a neighborhood park, is within, walking distance
of all .areas. within the site. Three additional city parks, Liberty, Cedar
River and Jones Park, are approximately half a mile north of the site.
J. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE:
1 . Section 4-706, R-1 Single Family District.
2. Section 4-709A, R-3 Medium Density Residence District.
3. Section 4-725, Amendments. •
4. Chapter 22, Parking and Loading.
K. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS:
1 . Land Use Report, 1965, Residential , Page 11 , and Objectives Pages 17 and 18.
L. IMPACT ON NATURAL SYSTEMS:
The rezoning of the property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems.
However, any development of the site will disturb present soil and vegetation
conditions, increase storm water runoff, thereby increasing the possibility of
erosion, and' add to the noise and traffic levels. These conditions may be
minimized by the application of proper development controls.
'M. SOCIAL IMPACTS:
The development of the site for residential use will increase opportunity for
social interaction.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE SIX
N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION:
Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended (RCW 43.21C), a declaration of non-significance
has been issued for the subject proposal .
0. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
1. City of Renton Building Division
2. City of Renton Engineering Division
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division
4. City of Renton Utilities Division
5. City of Renton Fire Department
6. United States Geological Survey
7. Renton School District Number 403
8. Puget Sound Power and Light Company
9. Pacific Northwest Bell
10. Department of Ecology
P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS:
1. The proposed rezone to R-1 is consistent with the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan which designates the site and area as single family
residential.
2. The existing zoning around the site is R-1 to the east, R-3 to the north,
and GS-1 to the south. The freeway (FAI-405) to the west is not zoned and
acts as a physical barrier. The R-1 and R-3 zones are developed as zoned;
the..GS-1 zone is developed as an electrical transmission line which pre-
cludes more intensive development. These circumstances together with
other elements appear to establish the subject site as a single family
area which requires protection from other uses to protect the existing
single family area. (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, 1965, Objectives
1, page 17; Policy Statement, Summary, pages 9 and 10)
3. The goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Report, page
17, objective number 1, states: "Prevent blight by protecting resi-
dential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltra-
tion of incompatible uses which would. contribute to premature decay
and obsolesence, and prevent the development of orderly growth pat-
terns." The majority of the Renton Hill area is an existing single
family residential neighborhood. Rezone and development of the
subject area to single family residence density, either by standard
• subdivision or by P.U.D. cluster-type development, would be compati-
ble with the existing neighborhood and consistent with such objective.
Development to higher densities would result in infiltration of incom
• patible zoning, land uses, and such Comprehensive Plan objectives.
4. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, page 17, also has as objective
number 4, "Protect property values within the community for the benefit
of its residents and property owners, through the effective control of
land use and the enforcement and application of building and construction
codes." The proposed rezone will control and regulate the land use of
the subject area to a degree that is compatible with other property in
the area, thereby encouraging and strengthening the livability, both
physical and social , within the existing neighborhood. This would
further the present character of the "Hill" as highly desirable single
family residence area.
5: Such rezone to R-1 will continue the present trend for new single
family residential construction and remodeling of existing residences
in this community, which further indicates the desirability of the.
area .as ,a separate single family residence area. It would, therefore,
be consistent with the objective number 6 of. the Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Report,_ page 18, to "encourage the development and utilization
- of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best
interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness
.and desirabllit,y as 'a p p lace in :which. to work, shop', alive, .and play."
:_..
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE SEVEN .
6. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, page 18, clearly states as a
method of implementation (number 6) the need to "conduct planning •
studies on problems of current interest or need as conditions change
and revisions or 'amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are deemed
. desirable." Conditions -have changed in the area through the continued
construction,' revitalization, investment, and community involvement in
the area as a single family neighborhood, as well as the lack of adequate
access for multiple family residential being developed, and the overall
attitude of the legislative body and the community toward the retention
of a viable and significant single family area through the revision to
the Comprehensive Plan.
It 'is further noted in this implementation section that "the purposeful
and consistent attention to the overall purposes and objectives of-the
Comprehensive Plan will produce continuing and long term benefits for
the community." The proposed rezone is a reflection of the "overall
purposes and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan" through the proper
use of land use regulations and zoning to protect the citizens of the
community and provide for orderly. and compatible growth trends. •
The "continuing" benefits to the community will be reflected by the
'proposed rezone consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The aspect of
planning as a "continuing" process is jmpOrtaht. As the City grows and
changes in its physical character so also do the attitudes of its citi-
zens. The Comprehensive Plan and its implementation methods (i .e. ,
zoning, capital improvements, arterials and streets plans) must reflect
these changes to be an effective planning tool .
•
7. The Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan, defines the ideal neighborhood
as an area "consisting of a relatively solid pattern Of homes, linked by
by quiet streets and centered around an elementary school and park. "
Although this concept has changed somewhat in recent years,—the Renton
Hill 'neighborhood basically reflects such a concept. This portion of
the Plan also states that "in planning neighborhoods the creation of
residential districts free. of overcrowding influences, arterial traffic
are important objectives. " Such objectives will be significantly
upheld by the proposed rezone.
8. The Policy 'Statement of the Comprehensive Plan, page 6, E. , TRaffic
Ways,' states 'that "It shall be the objective of the City of develop or
. require the development of its traffic ways in accordance with their
intended use. Generally, heavy and 'fast moving traffic will be routed
around neighborhoods with only minor residential streets bisecting
them. ,Right-of-way width, standards for different classifications of
streets shall be those 'developed in detail and contained in the Arterials
and Streets Report of the R.U.A.. Comprehensive Plan. The construction of
• ' streets shall be related to need and funtion as determined by traffic
• engineering studies. " Reference to the Arterials and Streets Plan as
well ' as the City's Subdivision Ordinance; indicates that this access to
the subject area is not adequate for any use higher density than single
family residential . Even as a new single family residential area the •
access would be questionable. However, it is one of the last remaining
large undeveloped areas of the "Hill" and, therefore, would not create
'significant additional traffic problems if developed as single family
residential .
9. Access to Renton 'Hill is restricted to one entrance that is subject to
blockage..by trains. Several of the streets which provide access to .the
various areas on the' "Hill" are steep, laid out in a grid arrangement, ,
and as such should not be overloaded. The grades of the streets present
" a potential hazard not normally found in 'a residential. development.
Also, one street has had a small section subsidence: (Comprehensive
. . Plan.,. Arterials and Streets, 1965, Purposes and Objectives of Study,.
pages-2 and 3) Both Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South have
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE EIGHT
a right-of-way width of forty feet with improvements less than that
which is normally required. Standard residential access streets are 50
to 60 feet in width. Due to existing structures and improvements, there
is little likelihood that these streets can be enlarged. Given this
situation, the proposed rezone would have fewer impacts to the existing
streets than the existing zoning. In fact, the Streets and Arterials
Plan, page 5, states that "in the planning, design, and location of the
major street system, consideration should be given to esthetics and
community amenities in order that the system may provide attractive
as well as safe, efficient circulation routes, and do the least damage
to adjacent land uses and improvements. Conversely, the design and
location of adjacent improvements should present the least possible.
interference with the traffic carrying capabilities of these traffic
ways."
10. The Streets and Arterials Plan also states as objectives (page 3):
a. Provision for the safe, efficient and convenient move-
ment of peoples and goods.
b. Arterial and street patterns compatible with and com-
plimentary to the general land use plan.
c. Adequate and safe access to allow convenient and effi-
cient utilization of abutting properties.
The proposed rezone would be consistent with these objectives by
reducing densities and resulting traffic volumes and providing for
land use more compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and roadway
system. Also, the introduction of any larger street system into
and through the area would be contrary to these and other Compre-
hensive Plan objectives. (i .e. , Policy Statement, Comprehensive
Plan, page 4, "These trafficways should be so designed that they
function efficiently. . .their operation should not conflict or
interfere with the functions of the residential neighborhoods. ")
11. It is apparent from the attached exhibits that the site has physical
characteristics such as slope, mined-out coal beds, soils, and existing
heavy vegetation which create potential problems in development and
which should be considered when reviewing the size and intensity of
development. ' Certain types of higher intensity development may in
fact create potential hazards. Therefore, it would be in the public
interest to minimize such possible hazard by proper planning, zoning, .
and development controls. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report
designates the site as 25% - 40% slope with certain portions over
40%slope. The Plan indicates "that extreme caution should be exer-
cised in the utilization of these potentially dangerous areas for
residential sites." The lesser density, of the R-1 zone would be
more compatible with such objectives and present fewer hazards,
especially if developed by P.U.D (Planned Unit Development) within
the single family residence density which would provide for clustering
of units within more appropriate areas of the site, preserving steeper
areas, significant trees, and natural open spaces. The Comprehensive
Plan, Policy Statement, page 6, infers such a relationship between
land use, topography, and other physical conditions of the terrain
when it states that "properly designed plats related to terrain conditions
will be pleasing to the eye, economically sound, and safe for the residents."
12. The site is subject to loud sound levels, especially from FAI-405'. The.
Department of Ecology recommended that performance standards be applied
to sleeping areas of the dwelling to permit sleep.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE
JUNE 13, 1978
PAGE NINE
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based upon the above background data, analysis, and the Comprehensive Plan
recommend approval of R-1 zoning for the subject.area. It is further
suggested that reasonable development of the area can and should be pursued
by means of a P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) . Existing vegetation and
other natural characteristics of the site should be retained as much as
possible and incorporated into site planning, design, and development.
Access shall be limited to existing streets and approved as part of any site
development. On-site soils and geology investigations should be conducted
to determine whether the site is safe to develop; and if it is safe to
develop, to obtain recommendations on how to develop.
•
r .r
y ti t
r.' :k...is
u.:
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: ® Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
• Police Department
Public Works Department
0 Building Div.
® Engineering Div .
8 Traffic Engineering Div.
Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his,/designee)
i � g • ,r /� � DATE : 5 —���-78
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
I;- / 73-7g REZONE 4Z4Z- 4,✓.r-'' +--,T4,---2' MAJOR PLAT
SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT.
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT n
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 1, �,.0 ?e /'i7g
r
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : Lf-0l�
Comments :
C .s=_30 -7.11
1. �.r`� /.fa�d--
Signature irector or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW 'BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS:
Department : () it, e a,,: 5
Comments : t\ o Ip-•,i,,KT"
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ' Date
L.F.
7 '
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department: ezajt,; ,.,:ei-f,4( I
Comments : ,e, « I ,`Lc;e,
Signature Of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
n •
Department : a f tie Z 3-i ; v,Nc
Comments : ` /
Aire ..16�1JJG./ !mac /� 4lc! Chi`-� � �ii,f/j��✓
Signature of Director or Authorized presentative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : iL-
-
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative , Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
T
REIV to
-"-c)0V /I/ '
Ax:0 1 i,.,....,.9,,...-- 4
, . 1:71
•
•
tit,�,/( G/ : ,C e.,7 IC frt.) /7!r/ ��G'-' -: i-
•
•
7;46, . (DK? , •. .., `;,1 /Late,,.-t, f,, Lt'r,,. ;,+:1�-.%,�/ /.1. -/// ;.Jr-._;: . . (•:r
re.. -)-e- •%c rr.. ,/ ; ..d ::z r�rr 7` �,,Q, 'rc,,,., +� i ,) ,
`-�il1.. .,� ..� fir` rr�� •L,f.�'-.Li ////� P.,1 JTif irj. -.J l�r,V ?�/�! /
i !��G�,• ✓a1J :?' j y;:t't•'rc ,'2i: t- c:J•l'{.;-,:',.`77 L)k,':,f.,.,./ /.t . 411
ct)alil/O re /rx., ,,\'r .)-r :: ,,/i..4 /,/i'iJ - if/6L/ CL U�71--e;.4. /.s4,ry
/ ^'i . 1.t. / a.' C;aiv'.'• ' h' ': y .J. ,_?z7,t.j!-::; :.i ‘'' J Ya: ,. ..•�iMT /, i7�
, rz.-- 57,%,: c:C_ ,,, 01.' ':.i e-i:.4 ,=4 i rc, ,4:1) /)) R:y.'„--i r. , J.."{,'..J. .. L-C, T/-??,
f ) �' 1 / /
e.." �' /,:,,,`t: 1),c :'-I, C. . :9 a .+�i.4' "i, !0-'1.' <', ')i' - '?4-1 1 t-
i_lre�EFT z-,I11 ),✓L7 .
' 4.&il.L A-2_,e e,e
•
•
COPY OF THE ABOVE MEMO ;•
(ok'd by - WCG
( 6/5/78)
Engineering Department
Gary Kruger , Planning Department .
•
Subject :. Renton Hill Rezone •
• The drainage basin encompassed by the proposed rezone area ,
and a large portion of already developed ,portion of Renton
Hill , empties into an already overloaded system. Any '
development .in this area would require extensive storm water
detention and/or other means of controlling the run-off .
The .rezone as proposed would in effect reduce the possible .
impact of storm water run-off over the present zoning .
• (Signed-- ) BOB BRAY
•
•
• •
•
irY:, ,.
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO: ® Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
Police Department ,
0. Public Works Department
4 Building Div.
Engineering Div.
® Traffic Engineering Div.
® Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his
designee)
i& >• ��� e�rtp,r
SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 35/-78 ; Application No . : (2 -/,3 -7s
Action Name:
Please review the attached. Review requested by (dat\e) : .:24/178
Note : Responses to be written in ink .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : C..)&
Comments : ,
_?_h:e ��7��e dot-, lO,c[ . _ (�C.�2.+��v i.4r(-1icc l
cr; 7„,e,yz....ese
Signature of Director r Authorize Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER . CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : x • , .t ,i,,,
Comments :
fit--- �n/-•�c:dZ�'t-(
C(4 6.--30
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ., Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS:
Department: atf c
Comments :
cl
/L Gf/41`e 2h7/' �- Gvpcc Zz Z 2 ' CY/A-i!y/54e.
a '
‘4/
. -/r/TV
Signature of Director or Authorized Repr sentative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS:
Department:
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department:
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized. Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
•
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ,
.tt
i'.
:i 1
•r ,
%ll ,
�4i fl
5
�y.
l���� 1,ri:.
Mn.
Cry
,f ,
is —
ti
,,I,r .tY�r
_ 3
.
PROPOSED/FINAL :LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE IN--SIGNIFICANCE
Application No . R-178-78 ® PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No. ECF-351-78 El FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal City initiated rezone of five
contiguous parcels consisting of 12 . 1± acres from R-3 to R- 1 .
Proponent CITY OF RENTON
Location of Proposal Renton Hill
Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department
This proposal has been determined to 0 have ®x not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is
0 is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ,
ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
non
Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance :
This negative declaration only applies to the rezone of the subject
site. Additional environmental review will be required as part of
specific site development review.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental , impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )
declaration of non- significance :
Responsible Officia' Gordon Y . Ericksen
Title p ni n, l i r/, or 1 Date June 5 , 1978
/ � f
Signat MLA., - - - - .
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
/ ,
; /
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON EXHIBIT NOo �
/ HEARING EXAMINER �T l
7g'
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION �U� 1 197� PMI`rEIVI 1�1�. � / ap�
SEPTEMBER 25 , 1963 AM
Page 2 718,9110,11r12t1,21314t 56
3 . Continued°
It was moved. by Peretti , seconded by Holmes , to recommend to the
Cit Council the granting of L-1 with deed restrictions as stated in
t e hector s report.
On the- question, Mr. Felker pointed out that since Renton has not as
yet adopted the Industrial Park Classification District as a part of the
Zoning Code, these restrictions on the property are voluntary agreements
on the part-'of the applicants.
Question being called , the motion carried.
C7 PUGET PROPERTIES , INC . , 'GS-1 , G9600 , G7200 to R-1 , SR-1 , R-3 , R-4 , B-1.
The Committee's report was read concurring in the requested zonings.
However, the Committee has some reservations on the Restricted B-1 area,
and also on the R-1 Utility Reserve area.
The Director' s report was to recommend that the proposals as sub-
,
mitted containing requests for R-1, SR-1 , R-4 , R-3 , and B-1 be approved
as submitted. The proposal for, development of Puget Properties is con-
sistent in that community goals and general requirements for neighbor-
hood facilities are met. It, is further believed that this proposal will
be in agreement with the development of the comprehensive plan for the
City.
A letter was read from Puget Properties , Inc. pursuant to the dele-
tion of certain areas designated for public use as follows :
1. School Sites No. 1 and 20
2 . Reservoir Site No. 1.
3 . The S. 600 ' of the E. 400 ° of the S.W. 1/4 of the N. W. 1/4 of
Section 30 , Twp. 23 N. , R. 5 E. W.M. (Reservoir site and portion
of proposed Benson' Highway Relocation area) .
The Commission inspected the deleted areas on a map. These deleted
areas were initialed and dated by the Commission and the map is to be
attached as a part of the permanent file.
* Mr. Hoglund, of Washington Natural Gas Company , spoke regarding the
area designated as R-1 Utility Reserve. He displayed a drawing, show-
ing the site arrangement for the proposed installation of reserve gas
tanks , pumping operation, etc. He stated that this would be in opera-
tion about 10 days a year , under only extreme cold weather conditons.
The location at the confluence with the El Paso Natural Gas line is im-
portant from the standpoint of economy and convenience . He further
stated that the Company will employ landscaping to screen the area as
much as possible from the adjacent areas. He cited Section 1V, 3 , of
the Renton City Zoning code, which allows for this type of public utility.
Slides of the subject areas were shown. Relative to the R-1 Util-
ity Reserve area, Mr. Jensen stated that the Commission exercises the
same control over such matterras this in the R-1 as in the P-1 District,
that. plot plans are subject to approval of the Commissionbefore a build-
ing permit could be issued.
Chairman Denzer asked if there were any objections to the proposed
rezones. There being no oral or written objections it was moved by
Peretti, seconded by Racanello , that the rezones as per the revised map
be recommended to the City Council. Motion carried. Mr. McGarrigle ob-
stained from voting.
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RECEIVED
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING CITY
HEARIINNG F EXAMINER
OCTOBER 12, 1977 NOV101977
• AM PM
MINUTES 718i9vi4J1,12I1I2,3I415
•COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian Gain, Logan Garrison, Sandra Gist,
Anthone Mola, Barbara Schellert, Clark Teegarden, Joan Walker.
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Thomas Buckingham.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director; Willis Roberts,
Recording Secretary.
Z• CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walker at 8:00 p.m. , who
led the Pledge of Allegiance.
2. ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Gist. All members responded present
with the exception of Commissioner Gain, who arrived at 8:03 p.m. ,
and Commissioner Buckingham (on vacation) . . It was noted that newly
appointed Commissioner Robert Kingen will not be available until
mid-November.
ACTION:
MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE ABSENT COMMISSIONER BE
EXCUSED. MOTION CARRIED.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The Chairman called for corrections or additions to the minutes of
August 10, 1977. Commissioner Garrison noted that the roll call
vote at the top of page eight should be corrected to include a "nb"vote
by Commissioner Gain. Noting no further corrections or additions,
IT WAS MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE AUGUST 10,
1977, MINUTES BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. MOTION CARRIED.
The Chairman called for corrections or additions to the minutes of
September 14, 1977. As none were offered, IT WAS MOVED BY GARRISON,
SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE MINUTES BE APPROVED AS WRITTEN.
MOTION CARRIED.
4. OLD BUSINESS:
COUNCIL REFERRAL:
PETITION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA, PAR-
TICULARLY. THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE RECEIVED
VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. .
CITY OF RENTC
THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 HEARING EXAMINER
ON THE. WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND
UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY J UN'1 8 1978
ON THE SOUTH. AM
Noting continuation from the September 14th public hearing, Chair-7181911011111211121344
man Walker requested a review by the Planning Director.
11
Mr. Ericksen noted receipt of additional information since the
previous public hearing--a legal memorandum and copy of a court
case from the attorney representing the Renton Hill Community
Association; a letter from Kathy Keolker, Chairperson, Renton
Hill Community Association; a letter from Mrs. E. Edna Costner,
439 Renton Avenue South, Renton, requesting consideration of low
density multi-family use on a particular parcel of property which
F iI Bxrrl NO. 7
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
October 12, 1977
Page Two
lies between Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South. He
referred the Commission to a memorandum from the Assistant
City Attorney reviewing the matter of area-wide zoning, as
requested by the Comprehensive Planning Committee. Mr. Ericksen
indicated that all input had been reviewed by the Comprehensive
Planning Committee; the area had been visited by Committee
members; and the Committee has considered the Land Use Plan, the
Community Facilities Plan, and the Arterial Street Plan for the
study area. Maps of the area relating to the existing and pro-
posed Comprehensive Plan, proposed Community Facilities Plan,
and existing Arterial Street Plan were displayed and discussed.
The Chairman requested comments from the Commission members.
Noting none, she called for the Comprehensive Planning Committee
report.
Commissioner Teegarden, Chairman of the Comprehensive Planning
Committee, noted that the Committee had met with representatives
from the Renton Hill Community Association and Gene Farrell ,
developer, and on three occasions had visited the study area.
After study and deliberation, the Committee submits its recom-
mendation .dated October 12, 1977. Mr. Teegarden then read the
committee report in its entirety (copy attached). It was noted
that the report primarily concerns that area of Renton Hill north
of the Puget Sound Power and Light powerline right-of-way to its
south, west to FAI-405, and east to the greenbelt area. Mr.
Teegarden also noted that Mrs. Costner's property had been field
checked and that it was their opinion that subdivision into
three single family residence lots would be more desirable for
Mrs. Costner and the community than low density multiple family
development. He then discussed the Committee's plans for further
study of the expanded area to the south and the possibility of
reviewing the zoning on Renton Hill .
Discussion among the Commissioners ensued relative to the question
of zoning in the area and the appropriateness of its review.
Noting current consideration of only the Comprehensive Plan in the
area, as described in the Comprehensive Planning Committee's
report, the Chairman invited audience comment.
Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, representing the
Renton Hill Community Association, thanked the members of the
Comprehensive Planning Committee for their in-depth study and
expressed appreciation regarding the task of the Commission and
their opportunity to participate in their review. Mrs. Koelker
stated that the Renton Hill Association concurs with the recom-
mendations.
Gene Farrell , 11112 Rainier Avenue and 280 Hardie S.W. , Renton,
stated that they also enjoyed their association with the Commit-
tee, although they are disturbed by the recommendation. Mr.
Farrell discussed the property presently designated multi-family
residential along the western edge of Renton Hill owned by the
Transamerica Company. He also discussed the multi-family desig-
nated area in the expanded area to the south and its relationship
to the single family residential area on Renton Hill . He ques-
tioned the Committee' s recommendation with regard to access,
noting the need for fire protection and potential single family
development to the east. He suggested. that Cedar Avenue South
be reserved for traffic purposes and that parking be restricted.
The matters of multi-family construction over old coal mines,
drainage, greenbelts,. and topography were discussed. Mr. Farrell
• noted economic benefits as the result of multi-family development
and inquired regarding possible compensation should the multi- '
family designated property be reduced to a lesser density.
Robert McBeth, 505E South Third Street and 1632 Lincoln Court S.E. ,
Renton, noted that part of Mr. Farrell 's comments related to the
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
October 12, 1977
Page Three
•
• zoning in the area rather than the Comprehensive Plan. He indi-
cated concurrence in the recommendation of the Committee, noting
the following factors as justification: the amount of traffic,
limited access, safety and character of the neighborhood. H,e
stated that they feel the Comprehensive Plan change is both
desirable and necessary, and they hope the Commission will
support it.
Patricia Parks, 118 No. 40th, Seattle, attorney for Transamerica
Development Corporation, described multi-family zoned property
owned by Transamerica which is affected by the Committee's recom-
mendation and discussed the history of its ownership. She indi-
cated that the City' s Comprehensive Plan had been reviewed during
the period of Transamerica' s ownership, and there had been no
recommendation for change until the present time. She asked that
the Comprehensive Plan reflect the interests of her client as well
as other property owners in the area and indicated that the pro-
posed change should be reasonable, unarbitrary, and fair. She
then cited potential loss to Transamerica should the Plan be
changed and noted possible legal action.
Commissioner Teegarden noted that while the Comprehensive Plan
has been revised in some instances in various parts of the City
since 1965; he doesn't recall that the subject area was con-
sidered during that period.
The Chairman called for further comments.
Mr. McBeth offered examples of court cases relating to what he
considers similar situations to that being reviewed in which it
was noted that the City has the right to change a designation
regarding certain property, if it feels it appropriate, as long
as the owner has not applied for a building permit. He d.is-
cussed the factors that he felt should be considered by the Plan-
ning Commission in making its decision and again asked for appro-
val of the Committee' s recommendation.
Ms. Parks requested that the decision be delayed to allow her
further time to review the Comprehensive Planning Committee' s
report and other issues.
Mr. Farrell noted that property adjacent to a freeway should be
considered in a unique manner, particularly if it' s sizable.
Mrs. Koelker noted that the matter had been under consideration
for some time and indicated that it was her opinion that an
extended public hearing is not warrented.
David L. DeVore, 6928 South 120th Place, Renton, stated that the
Committee study covered a large area, and yet attention was focused
in the vicinity of Cedar Avenue South. He indicated that this
could be considered discriminatory in his view.
Oliver Gotte, 810 Grant Avenue South, Renton, noted that parking • a
on the street was necessary due to inadequacy of the alleys.
James Breda, 1002 Grant Avenue South, Renton, noted the signifi-
cant amount of renovation occurring in the community.
Louis Traverso, 519 Cedar Avenue South, stated that the residents
want to maintain their quiet, safe community.
Noting no further public input, the Chairman inquired regarding
the wish of the Commission. IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED.
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
October 12, 1977
Page Four
Discussion regarding the appropriateness of closing the public
hearing followed, and it was noted that the Commission will be
making its recommendation to the City Council for final decision.
On the question, MOTION CARRIED.
Discussion followed, and IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GARRISON, THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION CONCUR IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
AND FORWARD IT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION.
Discussion among the Commissioners followed with regard to the
area involved, the prospect of further review of the expanded
area south of Renton Hill , and the status of building permits
in the affected area.
On the question, MOTION CARRIED.
The Chairman recognized Commissioner Teegarden, who moved as
follows:
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE COMMISSION ADVERTISE
AND HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 9, 1977, TO CONSIDER THE COM-
PREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA SOUTH OF THE PUGET SOUND POWER AND
LIGHT COMPANY TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PUGET DRIVE AND ALSO
THE AREA EAST OF RENTON HILL TO THE GENERAL AREA OF THE GREENBELT
AND TO CONSIDER THE REZONE REQUEST AS FORWARDED TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THAT BROADER AREA, INCLUDING
THE RENTON HILL AREA.
Discussion followed relative to the scope and magnitude of the
proposed review and the appropriateness of considering both the
Comprehensive Plan and the zoning.
On the question, a roll call vote was requested with the following
results:
GAIN - NO
GARRISON - NO
GIST - YES
MOLA - YES
SCHELLERT - YES
TEEGARDEN - YES
MOTION CARRIED.
Further discussion ensued with regard to the vote cast concerning
the earlier action to accept the Comprehensive Planning Committee' s
report for reference to the City Council . IT WAS h
ACTION:
MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THAT THE COMMISSION TAKE A
ROLL CALL VOTE ON THE MATTER OF ACCEPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
COMMWTTEE'S REPORT ON THE RENTON HILL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSIDERA-
TION AND ADVISE THE COUNCIL OF THE RESULTS. MOTION CARRIED.
A roll call reaffirming the vote taken earlier regarding the accept-
ance of the Comprehensive Planning Committee for recommendation to
the City Council was taken with the following results:
GAIN - YES MOLA - YES
GARRISON' - YES SCHELLERT - NO
GIST - NO TEEGARDEN - YES
FOUR YESES, TWO NOES.
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING
SEPTEMBER 14, 1977
MINUTES
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Thomas Buckingham, Brian Gain, Logan Garrison,
Sandra Gist, Anthone Mola, Barbara Schellert, Clark Teegarden, Joan Walker.
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
PRESS: Cathy Burke, Record Chronicle.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director; Willis Roberts,
Recording Secretary.
1- CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walker at 8:02 p.m. , who
led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
2. INTRODUCTION OF NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONER:
Newly appointed Commissioner, Barbara Schellert, was introduced and
welcomed to the Commission by the. Chairman.
3. ROLL CALL was taken by Acting Secretary Mola. All responded
present with the exception of Commissioner Gist, who was expected to
arrive later (arrived at 8:25 p.m. ) .
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
It was decided to defer approval of the minutes until the next meet-
ing, October 12, 1977.
5- OLD BUSINESS:
COUNCIL REFERRAL:
PETITION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA, PAR-
TICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE
VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH.
THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405
ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND
UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ON THE SOUTH.
Noting the petition from residents to review the Comprehensive Plan
in the Renton Hill area, the Chairman requested a review by the
Planning Director.
Mr. Ericksen noted that the matter had been referred to the Planning
Commission by the City Council . He indicated that the Commission's
area of initial concern is the Comprehensive Plan, although the
referral relates to both the Comprehensive Plan and zoning in the
area. He then pointed out the area under review on the Comprehen-
si,ve Plan map and discussed the various land use designations that
currently apply.
The Chairman referred the Commission to the original petition from
the community dated June 8, 1977, and another petition dated
August 26, 1977, requesting Comprehensive Plan review, and noted
that the petitions contained a total of 237 signatures. She then
called for questions from the Commission. As• none were offered,
the Chairman invited comments from the audience.
Renton Planning Com ;ion
Public Hearing Meet; y
September 14, 1977
Page Two
Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, noted she is Chair-
man of the Renton Hill Community Association and stated that the
petitions submitted represented 154 out of 280 households and that
more signatures were forthcoming this evening. She referred the
Commission to the Renton Hill Community Association letter of
September 10, 1977, in which specific concerns and recommendations
were listed, and indicated that they would be discussed more fully
this evening by individual residents chosen by their neighbors.
Mrs. Koelker stated that they oppose multi-family or industrial
development on or in the vicinity of Renton Hill for the following
reasons: it would have severe detrimental impacts; street widths
are not sufficient and have a maximum amount of traffic volume;
access is limited; parking is insufficient; it would affect the
low crime rate; the historical value of Renton Hill should be pre-
served; and the residents wish to maintain the pride of ownership
evident in the community. She then introduced the next neighbor-
hood representative, Claude Rogers.
Claude Rogers , 420 Renton Avenue, Renton, discussed traffic condi-
tions, noting the limited width of the streets, limited access, and
potential impact on traffic should multi-family development and/or
another access occur.
Margaret Jernigan, 412 Mill Avenue South, Renton, described the
safety and security of the neighborhood, noting it has the lowest
crime rate in the city. It is the neighborhood' s opinion that
this is due to the limited access, and it is requested that the
deadend streets be retained permanently.
Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue South, Renton, indicating that she was
speaking for the children of the community, expressed opposition to
further multi-family development, which could involve the need for
additional school buses and access to the community, thus creating
hazardous conditions for school children waiting for school buses.
Amelia Telbin, 508 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, indicating that she
had lived in the community for 69 years , discussed the history and
development of the community and noted that it had always been a
predominantly single family residential area. She also noted that
many residents are second and third generation families and asked
that the integrity of the neighborhood be preserved.
Jim Breda, 1002 Grant Avenue South, Renton, discussed the unique
character of Renton Hill , noting that while it is an old community,
it is comprised of primarily new and old single family residences
and residents from a wide range of age groups, who are homeowners.
He suggested that other areas of the city would be appropriate for
multi-family development.
Mrs . Koelker, Chairman of the Renton Hill Community Association.,
thanked the Commission for listening to their concerns and intro-
duced their attorney, Robert McBeth, who would discuss possible
solutions.
Robert E. McBeth, 505B South Third Street, Renton, indicated that it
is his opinion that the Commission can consider zoning because of n
the referral from the Council. Mr. McBeth reviewed the problems
caused by further multi-family development--the need for access from
two points to meet ordinance requirements, impact on traffic, impact
on children' s safety, and the need to preserve the quality of the
neighborhood. He stated that the community is asking that the
Comprehensive Plan be changed from multi-family designations adjacent
to Cedar Avenue to single family. In addition, they request that
there be no through streets on Renton Hill , that the R-3 zoned area
be changed to single family residential , that the area of R-4 zoning
be changed to a less dense designation, and that the heavy industry
designation and H-1 zoning on the north side of Renton Hill be
changed to single family or greenbelt. He also requested that the
Commission expedite its review so that the character of the community
will not be changed.
ftWIIIF7
. •
, • '
. . -
- '4--
, i •
. '
• cor \ . CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
, -- - ---A
;I .4 „4,.......w
10,0105,-. -ftft.
4111
No. 1 0
ft ,
e
• _ , ,
.
. •fteg
• ''.-M %"
L. IP 1 PIPAt 1,
CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
......r...., .
No. 11
\:- •44,..- ,AL/. • criy •vg
• ' -- yA;
. Niklea ta 4 I 1 iir AIN'
.. ;••-•?'- :-.-,' --i-- .V illir
4 114.. . , •sid ,. 4 . ..,,,,,,,111,
'4 lif 4.44,
.4
,•1 •7:-
. i " f 1 r '9', , • i i• • It. I ''. .'',1 4'. 1 lwe". '14111k t.,' i 1 ii 'if '' •
, p A. . ,,d !.14 .' liq' flottt:,-...-Ifft;:4,..,,,,, , ir f. l• ' •
- - ' ,: i 14y; i 1,I•: 1.: ei,4:4 I. i'"nel; . it t -y. , , END
114,‘ • '1,11 ',.t .Z 4,A i .! ;41 ..S., 41,0 t 1 1 1 I OF CEDAR AVE. SO
ir". :; 1 1 , ;.;.` i
o • i AT
I, k , p 4 tliiiii
,,,, 4 ', ' ) '
N
:, ;,. c, ., .: ,.., ,.,, ,,, . ...f. ,ii.,;, 11 . Ili , .4,.,:•,, SOUTH 9TH STREET
No. 12
.,:•?-4 . -
."...
0
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
September 14, 1977
Page Four
Bill Collins, 420 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, suggested that when
any existing apartments on the west side of Cedar Avenue South
reach the condition where they have to be replaced, a provision
be made that the area is reverted to the single family zoning in
the vicinity.
Mr. McBeth discussed further the amenities with regard to the apart-
ments already constructed, the matter of the freeway and topography
forming a natural buffer from the downtown core, the substandard
streets and traffic problems; and the impact of multi-family
development on the neighborhood.
John Giuliani , 1400 South 7th, Renton, asked if the Planning Commis-
sion would actually visit the area and was advised by the Chairman
that they would.
Noting no further audience input, IT WAS MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY
GIST, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED.
Discussion among the Commissioners followed relative to the appro-
priateness of closing the hearing at this time.
On the question, MOTION FAILED.
Ruth Larson asked what protection the community has that the project
cannot be continued, if the public hearing is closed and the matter
referred to committee.
The Chairman requested advice from the Planning Director. Mr. Erick-
sen stated that he would have to consult with the City Attorney
regarding the zoning question, but that ,there is no question that the
Commission can review the Comprehensive Plan, the arterial plan, and
street patterns in the area. He suggested that the public hearing
be continued to October 12th and the matter be referred to committee
for specific report.
Following a brief discussion, IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING
REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW IN THE RENTON HILL AREA BE
CONTINUED UNTIL. OCTOBER 12, 1977, AND THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED
TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK
AT THAT TIME.
Discussion followed concerning clarification of the Council ' s
referral . It was the consensus that the elements of the Comprehen-
sive Plan should be reviewed, and in the meantime, the legality of
the review of the zoning would be checked.
On the question, MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner Teegarden, Chairman of the Comprehensive Planning Com-
• mittee, announced that the committee will meet at 7:30 p.m. on
September 21, 1977, and invited community representatives and Mr.
Farrell to attend. Mr. Teegarden also asked that the Planning
Director look into the question of Planning Commission review of
the zoning in the subject area and advise the committee.
A recess was declared by the Chairman at 10:08 p.m. The meeting was
resumed at 10:30 p.m. with all members noted above in attendance.
5• ADMINISTRATIVE:
A, PLANNING COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
The Chairman referred the Commissioners to a final draft of the
Planning Commission annual report and invited any additions,
corrections, or revisions.
J Y
•
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
November 21 , 1977 Municipal Building
Mo`hday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the
regular meeting to order.
ROLL CALL OF GEORGE J . PERRY, Council President; EARL CLYMER, KENNETH D. BRUCE,
COUNCIL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE.
STAFF IN CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, Acting City Attorney;
ATTENDANCE TED BENNETT, Deputy Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GORDON
ERICKSEN, Planning Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director;
RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; CAPT. BOURASA, Police Representative;
DONALD CUSTER, Administrative Assistant.
PRESS GREG ANDERSON and CATHY BURKE, Renton Record Chronicle.
MINUTE APPROVAL Councilwoman Thorpe requested addition Page 3, Paragraph 8, Final
Estimate Asphalt Resurfacing , Line 11 ; add "and that project meets
City standards . " Councilman Stredicke requested Page 4, last para-
graph, first line - Remove word "committee" and add "Staff. " MOVED
BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES WITH CORRECTIONS
STATED. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Council Candidate Elect C. Shane, 3003 Mountain View Ave. N. , objected
to Council action as reported in 11/20 newspaper article that alleged
Uniformed layoff of police and fire personnel in regards to contract negotiations .
Personnel E. Kunstle, 1015 Jones Ave . S. E, commented on same newspaper article
objecting to police contract item re bonus pay for passing of physical .
Heather Downs Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. S. E. , recalled Heather Downs sewer LID
Sewer LID #297 #297 matter under discussion 11/14/77, asked reconfirmation of original
plan approved by Council 3/7/77. Marlene Vickers, 13439 S.E. 141st,
Reconfirmed Co-Chairman of S.O.S. reported extensive study made and findings that
Council Approval canyon area in question unsuitable for sewer trunk placement. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, SUBJECT OF HEATHER DOWNS AREA SEWERS BE
BROUGHT TO THE COUNCIL FLOOR. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke reported
distribution of packet of information on subject. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL RECONFIRM EARLIER ACTION OF MARCH 7, 1977 ON
HEATHER DOWN SEWER LID #297. CARRIED.
Senior Center Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd. S. , inquired when Council would dis-
cuss the Senior Citizens Center, being advised of planned discussion at
7:30 p.m. budget hearing 11/23/77.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and pub-
Renton Hill lished according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to
Comprehensive consider the Planning Commission recommendation of the Comprehensive
Plan Plan of the Renton Hill Planning Area (that area generally bound by
FAI-405 on the West, Cedar River on the North, the hillside and undevel-
oped area on the East and the powerline right-of-way on the South.
Letter from Planning Director Ericksen submitted Planning Commission
recommendations per Council request of 6/6/77. The letter explained
the process of hearings and work meetings with detailed analysis of
land use, circulation and community facilities; explaining the Commis-
sion had adopted the Comprehensive Planning Committee recommendation
at conclusion of public hearing 10/12/77. Letter from Kathy Keolker,
532 Cedar Ave. S. , President, Renton Hill Community Association, sub-
mitted statement listing concerns of Renton Hill residents and favored
the Planning Commission recommendation re the Comprehensive Plan.
Petition bearing 227 signatures of Renton Hill residents and property
owners expressed opposition to the building of any additional multiple
dwellings at the upper end of Cedar Ave. S. or any adjacent area that
li would require access through our community. (Petition originally filed
with Planning Commission 8/26/77.) Petition bearing 28 signatures pro-
tested rezoning Mill Ave. S. from R-3 multi-family residential to R-1
single-family, having been so zoned since 1964. Document prepared by
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
EXHIBIT N O. 8-
HEARING EXAMINER
AM JUN 1 31978 PM ITEM NO ie-r/F-
7E'
7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,41516
Rentcn`City Council
1 1"/21/71 Page 2
Public ,Hearing - Continued
Comprehensive Transamerica Development with letter from Patricia Parks , Attorney,
Plan for objected to change in comprehensive plan designating the Renton Hills
Renton Hill area as single family residential area (R-1 ) , noting Transamerica
Continued owns 10. 05 acres at the south end of Cedar Ave. S. designated as R-3.
The letter explained proposed sale of 6.67 acres f or 90 unit four-
plex condominium and explained degree of steepness of property and
that property abuttsFAl-405, making the property suitable for multi-
family residential use. The letter alleged loss of value of property
in change from R-3 to R-1 ; an attached traffic study claimed 50% use
of optimum design for Cedar Ave. S. , suggesting means for increasing
efficiency of traffic circulation , such as one way street and removing
one 61 ft. sidewalk. Planning Director Ericksen used charts , maps and
slides to present review of area, the nature of Comprehensive Plan,
and Planning Commission recommendation, also distributing maps and
written recommendation for audience use. Mr. Ericksen explained the
land use element findings , circulation and community facilities, and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, for single family residen-
tial for area north of Puget Sound transmission right-of-way; add
greenbelt area-steep hillside areas , powerline and natural drainage
courses; delete Mill Ave. S. extention and Grant Ave. connection with
continued limited access; area north of railroad designated multi-
family be resignated as future recreation.
Continued -- Persons present speaking in favor of Planning Commission recommendation:
Historic Kathy Keolker; Claude Re7ers , 420 Renton Ave. S. ; Ruth Larson, 714
Unique High Ave. S. ; Ethel Telban, 508 Cedar Ave. S. ; Jim Breda, 1002 Grant
Neighborhood Ave. S. ; Mario Gotti , 1005 High Ave. S . Persons opposing recommendation:
Desires Bill Montangne,Vice-President Transamerica Development Co. ; Gene
Single-Family Farrell , 11112 Rainier Ave. S. , developer and purchaser of Trans-
Residential america property; Patricia Parks , 118 N. 40th, Seattle, Persons
Area present speaking against chance in zoning of Mill Ave. -S. from multi- .
family to single-family residential : Mrs. Ray Hansen, 336 Mill Ave.
S. ; Anita Thelander, 512 Mill Ave. S. ; Paul Von Beck, 18184 S .E. 41st
Place, Issaquah, Wash. Also speaking in favor of the recommendation :
Robert McBeth, Attorney for Renton Hill Community Association, 505B
South 3rd. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ELIMINATING EXTENSION OF MILL
AVE. S. AND GRANT AVE. S. , CHANGING DESIGNATION OF ALL OF RENTON HILL
FROM MULTI-FAMILY TO SINGLE-FAMILY WITH EXCEPTION OF MILL AVENUE SOUTH
TO SOUTH SEVENTH STREET AND THAT THE AREA VHICH IS OCCUPIED BY GLADDING
McBEAN (Interpace) BE DESIGNATED AS RECREATIONAL. CARRIED. See later.
Recess MOVED BY BRUCE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Council
recessed at 10:01 p.m. and reconvened at 10: 14 p.m. Roll Call : All
Council Members present.
Renton Hill MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF RENTON
Zoning HILL ZONING TO THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED. MOVED BY
PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER MATTER OF ORDINANCE AND MORITORIUM
l'-. Renton Hill (ON BUILDING OF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE RENTON HILL AREA)
Moratorium TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.
Councilman Stredicke noted Consent Agenda item - letter from Rolling
-,Rolling Hills Hills Homeowners Association requested moratorium on multi-family
Moratorium building for 90 days or until Planning Commission completes study of
area east of Renton Hill bounded by power line transmission on North,
Benson Road on West, Puget Drive on South and Edmonds S.E. on the East.
(See later Consent Agenda) MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, AMEND
MOTION TO INCLUDE LETTER FROM ROLLING HILLS HOMEOWNERS AND MORATORIUM
IN THE REFERRAL. THE AMENDING MOTION CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED,
CARRIED. (See Page 6 and Page 7. )
ORDINANCES MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE
AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS TO BE READ AT THIS TIME. MOVED BY PERRY ,
SECOND STREDICKE, Council go into Executive Session to consider property
value required prior to adoption of resolution. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND SHINPOCH, MATTER OF EXECUTIVE SESSION BE TABLED UNTIL NEW
BUSINESS ON THE AGENDA. CARRIED. MOTION TO SUSPEND RULES, CARRIED.
?Alton City Council
1/28/77 Page 5
rdinances and Resolutions - Continued
arbage Rate COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL : 3-AYES: CLYMER,
rdinance , `1�� STREDICKE, THORPE; 2-NO' S: PERRY AND SHINPOCH. According to
continued �r�t statute, majority vote of Council membership is required to
pass an ordanc2 into law. MOTION FAILED. Ordinance returned to
the Ways and Means Committee for one week.
Anton Hi T—Ii"�The Jays and Means Committee recommended first reading and referral
)mprehensive Plan back to committee of the following ordinances :
'dinance An ordinance was presented amending the City' s Comprehensive Land
Use Plan, Maps and data relating to Renton Hill vicinity. Follow-
ing reading, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER
ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
imited G.O. Bonds An ordinance was presented providing for the issuance and sale of
?nior Center $900,000 par value "Limited General Obligation Bonds , 1978"
providing a part of funds for cost of land acquisition and con-
struction of a Senior Citizens Center and appurtenances. Follow-
ing reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL
- REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. "Substitute
motion by Thorpe, to advance the ordinance to second and final
readings , failed for lack of a second. Councilwoman Seymour-
Thorpe then stated for the record, Council has been advised
that interest rates will not be declining , but increasing, that
early adoption would mean lower interest; also that public has ex-
pressed 'opinions at committee and council meetings , that the only t
. objections received were from people outside the City limits and
urged Council action. MOTION CARRIED returning ordinance to the °
Ways and Means Committee.
!solution #2149 The Ways and Means Committee recommended reading and adoption of
nal Plat a resolution which approved MacPherson' s Inc. , Ruddell ' s 2nd
iddell ' s 2nd Addn. Addition final plat FP-087-77; property located at the Northeast "
��4ri ✓ corner of Monroe Ave. N.E. and N.E. 10th St. Following reading,
it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION
AS READ. CARRIED.
IDIENCE COMMENT Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd.S. , inquired regarding bonds for
the Senior Citizen Center, being advised by Councilman Clymer
that general obligation bonds are voted by citizens for property
nior Center Bonds tax, however, that councilmanic or limited general obligation
' bonds which were before the Council tonight and will be presented
next week, are paid from the City's general revenue and are
presented to the Council for approval . -
lling Hills Jim McClelland, 1922 Jones Ct. S.E. ; representing Rolling Hills
ratorium Homeowners Assoc. inquired re committee discussion of moratorium,
being advised by Committee Chairman Perry of the schedule. (Atta-ched)
78 Budget Charles Shane, 3003 Mt. View N. , made inquiries of the 1978 budget
and asked that B & 0 tax be adopted.
ecutive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SES-
SION IN THE 6TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. CARRIED. The Council
Members left the Chambers at 10:10 p.m. and returned at 11 :00 p.m. '
ROLL CALL: All Members present as previously shown. Motion by
Stredicke, Second Shinpoch, to adjourn the meeting, failed.
MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND NOT
OBSERVE 11 :00 p.m. CLOSING RULE. CARRIED.
uncil Position Councilman Perry expressed disappointment that newly elected Coun-
lled cilman Thomas Trimm was unable to attend meeting for swearing in;
omas Trimm inquiring concerning any date requirement for certification. Moved
by Stredicke, Second Thorpe, continue meeting to next week. SUB-
STITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL APPOINT THOMAS
TRIMM TO FILL_ VACANT COUNCIL POSITION, FORMERLY HELD BY WILLIAM
GRAN. CARRIED.
JOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.
: 13 p.m. ezzatruz.,J a,.
Delores A. Mead, City Clerk
i
•
Renton City Council
12/5/77 Page 5
Old Business - Continued
/ Repainting 3/4 MG Highlands Elevated Tank and the 3 MG Mt. Olivet Reservoir.
A Bid Approved Public Works Director Gonnason advised approval interpreted and
bid awarded , Attorney indicating procedure legal .
Seminar Councilwoman Thorpe called attention to Surface Water, Green River
Basin, Seminar in Auburn 12/14/77, asking Planning Director be
notified. Mayor Delaurenti noted he will be participating on the
panel ,
Christmas Councilman Stredicke complimented Mayor and Staff on working with
Decorations Downtown Merchants on Christmas lighting change over. The Mayor
noted attempt will be made for television coverage.
Public Services Public Services Committee Chairman Bruce submitted committee report
Committee Report noted review of Brad McElroy request to connect to the City' s
sewer system and noted McElroy has executed a covenant to annex
and is included in the proposed Lozetti annexation for which peti-
tions are being prepared for circulation. The committee recom-
mended application be approved subject to limitation of single
lateral for single family unit and access to the property be
) ' limited to a single driveway. The report also recommended notifi-
cation of adjacent proposal . MOVED BY
property owners as to the
BRUCE, SECOND SHINPOCH, Council concur in the committee report.
ROLL CALL VOTE: 2-AYES: SHINPOCH AND BRUCE; 5-NO' s : PERRY ,<THORPE,
STREDICKE, TRIMM AND CLYMER. MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND PERRY, CITY_CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO NOTIFY McELROY ASKING
FOR ANNEXATION PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO SEWER SERVICE. CARRIED.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, NO FURTHER CONNECTIONS OUTSIDE THE
/ CITY FOR SEWER SERVICE BE ENTERTAINED UNLESS THERE IS EXTREME,
xy6� CERTIFIED HEALTH HAZARD.* Councilwoman Thorpe noted this applies
to existing structures , no new construction being allowed to con-
0`' Sewer Connections nect. Upon inquiry by Councilman Trimm, Public Works Director
to Property Out- Gonnason noted previously adopted resolution clarifying those
Side City Limits properties adjacent Lo sewer line in City would be allowed to con-
Disallowed Unless nect upon findings of health hazard; these last few items before
Extreme Health the Council requiring extension of lines in order to connect.
Hazard Gonnason asked that resolution be rescinded if policy changed.
Gonnason noted need for septic tanks for new construction in event
of change of policy, noting late corner' s agreement paid in event
of connections in the past. Councilman Clymer disapproved of
septic tanks . *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE,
COUNCIL REFER SUBJECT MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.
CARRIED.
/ Elk Ridge Drive The Public Services Committee report recommended denial of request
Name Change to change the name of Eagle Ridge Drive to Elk Ridge Drive, suggest-
Denied ing alternate proposal to deed the entry way of the Elks Club to •
the City to name " Elk Ridge Drive" or pursue other similar approach
for better identity. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL
CONCUR iN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
City Hall The committee report noted review of the Public Works Department
1✓ Heating System request for modification to the City Hall heating system and
Modifications installation of the Vertrex Energy Manager system; the Mayor' s
Approved Committee on Energy Conservation also reviewed the proposal and
recommended favorably. The committee report recommended Council
concurrence in the modifications and installation and that the
matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for appropria-
tion of funds within the limitations of the existing budget.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
•
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Perry noted review of Council procedure ordinance and
Council Procedures asked that each Council Members , the Mayor and City Clerk review
the ordinance also; requesting adherence to the rules .
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
;7Ordinance #3186 The Ways and Means Committee Chairman, Earl Clymer, presented com-
Renton Hill mittee report recommending second and final readings of an ordinance
�\ Comprehensive Plan amending the City' s Comprehensive Land Use Plan of Renton Hill area.
. I
,
Renton City Council
12/5/77 Page 6
Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued
Ordinance #3186 First reading of the ordinance was 11/28/77. City Clerk Mead
Continued the ordinance designating area as single-family and multi-family
Renton Hill residential , greenbelt and recreational ; also deleting Mill Ave. S
Comprehensive extension and Grant Ave. S. as being impractical and inappropriate.
Plan Followin readin s it was MOVED BY CLYMER SECOND THORPE COUNCIL
9 9 >
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES except Councilman
Bruce was not present during the Roll Call . MOTION CARRIED.
--- _ --
-
--Resolution #2150 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended reading and adop-
,, ✓Housing & tion of the following resolutions : Resolution was read adopting
4 > Community the 1978 Housing and Community Development Program; Public Hearings
Development held 11/28/77 and 12/5/77. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL
Block Grants ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
,Resolution #2151 Resolution was read allowing Teleprompter to merge its subsidiary
;it,V Teleprompter TV companies under the name of Northwest Cablevision. MOVED BY
,O Merger CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #2152 Resolution was read extending the Renton Hill building moratorium
;,Moratorium on multi-family residences for a period of 90 days . MOVED BY
1/(A Renton Hill Area CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.
Councilman Stredicke requested that the Administration look
at the access problems on Renton Hill ; Mayor Delaurenti assigned
Public Works Director. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance #3187 MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECONSIDER ACTION 'TAKEN
Garbage Collection 11 /28/77 CONCERNING THE GARGABE ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Following
Rate Increase readings of the ordinance, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL
First Reading of ADOPT ORDINANCE. * Councilwoman Thorpe requested Administration
Ordinance 11/21 include information to residential users with billing - how to
/ obtain one can rate. Councilman Perry requested for the record,
percentage of increase, explaining garbage franchise stipulation
`\i that the contract would be open for renegotiation if rates increase
above 20-30% infive-year period. Gonnason explained rate increase
due to increase in County dump fees - one can 4. 1% increase; 2 can
5.6% increase; additional cans 12% increase (within 25 ft. ) .
Gonnason ended list with 2-yard container, 22%. Councilman
Stredicke requested report listing increases for various industrial
concerns 1975-78. Gonnason explained cost-of-living clause in
contract for drivers , which may mean increase in costs within six
months . Councilwoman Shinpoch asked the alternatives to one-bidder
award situation. Councilwoman Thorpe noted recycling studies .
ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: THORPE, SHINPOCH BRUCE AND CLYMER; 2-NO: PERRY
AND STREDICKE; 1-ABSTAIN DUE TO INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION: TRIMM.
*MOTION CARRIED. Stredicke encouraged recycling, outlining processes .
Executive Session MOVED BY PERRY , SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL MEET IN EXECUTIVE SESSION
FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING WAGE NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Council
President Perry requested audience and Staff Members leave the
Chambers. Time: 10:30 p.m. Council convened at 10:48 p.m. All
Council Members present at Roll Call .
Greetings Councilwoman Thorpe extended Happy Hanukkah greetings , asking
to be noted in the record.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL ADJOURN THE MEETING.
CARRIED. Time: 10:50 p.m.
a4/-e- Lq 727//1/3C-
Delores A. Mead, City Clerk
4'Rpnton' Ci ty Council
12/19/77 Page 3
Correspondence and Current Business - Continued
Rezone Appeal $110 fee plus $25 appeal fee. p 1OTI0N CARRIED adopting committee recom
Ray Ball mendations. Thorpe asked her NO voice vote be recorded.
• Leslie Adams Letter from Acting City Attorney Warren advised he appeared in
Court Case #828227 Superior Court on 12/8/77 to argue the Writ of Certiorari on the
McLaughlin Rezone McLaughlin Rezone filed by Leslie Adams , et ux vs City of Renton.
Appeal R 001-77 The letter explained Judge' s decision that the City' s actions were
not arbitrary and capricious and therefore dismissed the Writ.
Copy of trial brief and pertinent documents included. Information
r� Traffic Signals - Letter from Carl Wyatt, President of the Renton Shopping Center, Inc. ,
Renton Shopping Merchant' s Association, called attention to several restrictive and
Center unsafe features in the traffic signal control system adjacent to
the Center. (1 ) Intersection of Rainier Ave. S. and S. 3rd. ; lengthen-
ing of left turn signal time and east-west walk signal time requested.
(2) Intersection of Sunset Blvd. , Langston Rd. , and Hardie St. ; re-
quested lengthing of time for both left turn signal and north-south
walk signal . (3) Intersection of Rainier Ave. S. and S. 4th Pl . ;
requested construction of a left turn storage lane for northbound
traffic on Rainier Ave. S. to allow left turn into Center. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINIS-
TRATION FOR RECOMMENDATION BACK TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE.
CARRIED.
Human Rights Letter from Albert Talley, Chairperson of the Renton Human Rights
r Ordinance and Affairs Commission, submitted an ordinance amending Title II ,
Chapter 10 of the City Code setting forth duties and procedures of
the Human Rights and Affairs Commission. The letter explained the
two public hearings held by the commission , ordinance having been
drafted with assistance of former City Attorney Sheilan and City
Attorney Warren.ren. The letter notnoted the Washington :rate Human Ri 9htS
Commission and attorney have determined it is satisfactory to provide
for inter-agency cooperation in the processing of complaints. Refer•-
ral to the Ways and Means Committee recommended. MOVED BY PERRY ,
SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM-
. MITTEE. CARRIED.
Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Richard Geissler to the
Fire Chief permanent position of Fire Chief for the City effective 1/1/78,
asking confirmation by the City Council . The letter noted successful
completion of the six-month probationary period by Chief Geissler as
of 1/1/78. MOVED BY BRUCE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPOINT-
MENT. CARRIED.
---— --_ oti_on by Stredicke, second by Shinpoch, for recess , Failed.
OLD BUSINESS
Planning and Planning anid Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted committee
Development report recommending that the Council refer the matter of the zoning
Committee Report on Renton Hill to the Planning Department to review the Comprehen- .
Renton Hill sive Plan changes recently passed by the Council and the zoning of
40 Zoning the Renton Hill area to determine those parcels of land bearing
different zoning classifications than those permissible in the
amended Comprehensive Plan. The report noted the Planning Dept.
would then initiate rezoning requests where parcels do not conform
with proposed uses of the amended plan and would prepare the necessary
reports; the Hearing Examiner to determine, after a public hearing,
whether or not the parcels identified by the Planning Department should
he rezoned., MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Uoor inquiry
by Councilwoman Thorpe on areas where application had been made
prior to the moratorium, Acting City Attorney Warren advised of prior
vested rights. MOTION CARRIED.
South Renton The committee report recommended Council concurrence in the Planning
Comprehensive Commission recommendations for South Renton Comprehensive Planning
Plan Area Area subject to the follow: (1 ) Designate a lineal greenbelt area
along west side of proposed SR 515 extending southerly frorn, S 27th
St. to SE 172nd St. ; (2) Include buffer of low density multi-family
•
w " '
ROGER L. SHIDLER SHIDLER, McBROOM, GATES & BALDWIN (206) 223-4666
GEORGE W. McBROOM
WILLIAM H. GATES LAW OFFICES
WILLIAM F. BALDWIN 1000 NORTON BUILDING
JAMES R. IRWIN
JAMES C. MIDDLEBROOKS SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
RICHARD B. DODD
FREDERICK ROSS BOUNDY
WILLIAM H. NEUKOM
JAMES L. FLETCHER June 9, 1978
CRAIG V. WENTZ
DAVID T. McDONALD
PATRICIA J. PARKS
DALE K. ROUNDY
GARY D. HUFF
WILLIAM A. BUTLER
DAVID H. BINNEY
Mr. L. Rick Beeler
Land Use Hearing Examiner
City of Renton
Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue S.
Renton, Wa. 98055
Re: City of Renton, File No. R-178-78
Application for Rezone from. R-3 to
R-1
Dear Examiner Beeler:
We represent Transamerica Development Corporation. En-
closed for filing is the original and one copy of a brief
in opposition to the proposed rezone.
Yours sincerely,
mes R. Irwin
JRI/ds •
Enc.
cc: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
William Montaigne
RECEIVED
C1TY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
JUN 91978
AM PM
7e849r 1,11,12,1121',415,A
EXHIBIT NO. ‘7
ITEM NO. W /7F- 7`K . ..
J
RECEWED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARir G EXAMINER
JUF; 91978
AM PM
1 7181911011111211121314154
2
3
4 IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE L. RICK. BEELER, HEARING EXAMINER
5 In Re )
6 CITY OF RENTON REZONE )
7 APPLICATION ) File No. R-178-78
8 ) MEMORANDUM BY TRANSAMERICA
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY IN
9 ) OPPOSITION TO THE CITY OF
RENTON' S APPLICATION FOR
10 ) REZONE FROM R-3 to R-1
11 Transamerica Development Company ("TADCO") respectfully
12 submits the following memorandum in opposition to the application
13 of the City of Renton to downzone its property.
14
15 INTRODUCTION
16 TADCO owns approximately 11-1/4 acres of property in
17 Renton presently zoned R-3. The location of the property is
18 shown on Exhibit A attached hereto. TADCO' s holdings represent
19 by far the greater portion of the property to be affected by the
20 downzone.
21 On December 5, 1977, the City Council adopted an ordinance
22 amending the City' s Comprehensive Plan for the area in which
23 TADCO' s property is situated, and, in addition, passed a resolu-
24 tion extending the Renton Hill building moratorium on multi-
25 family residences for a period of 90 days. The ordinance, as
26 adopted by the Council, deleted the property located on Mill
27 Avenue to the north of TADCO' s property from the proposed
28 downzoning. Thus, the only property in the vicinity affected by
29 the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan was TADCO's property.
30 On December 27, 1977, TADCO filed an application in the
31 Superior Court of King County for a Writ of Certiorari directed
32
MEMORANDUM - 1 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
to the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Renton and to the
2 City Council with respect to the action taken on December 5,
3 1977.
4 On December 27, 1977, the Honorable Stanley C. Soderland
5 issued a Writ of Certiorari to the City of Renton. On January 11,
6 1978, the Honorable William C. Goodloe entered an order on show
7 cause, which ordered that:
8 "1. The writ of certiorari issued on December 27, 1977, to
the City of Renton, is confirmed;
9
2 . All proceedings pertinent to the amendment of the
10 Comprehensive Plan for Renton Hills, including zoning
hearing, are stayed and prohibited until the final determina=
11 tion herein;
12 3. All moratoria on the construction of multi-family
structures in Renton are stayed and prohibited until the
13 final determination herein; and
14 4. Plaintiff posts an injunction bond in the amount of
$500. 00.
15
16 Subsequently, in February of 1978, a Stipulation and Order
17 modifying the stay of proceedings was entered in the King County
18 Superior Court action. The stipulation provided that the stay
19 of proceedings should be lifted to allow the City of Renton to
20 conduct the necessary rezoning hearings, subject to TADCO' s
21 right to request that all the initial records for the Comprehensive
22 Plan change, plus any records from the Land Use Hearing Examiner's
23 decision in the zoning action, together with follow-up City
24 Council action, be certified to the Superior Court for consolidated
25 review. A copy of the Stipulation and Order Modifying Stay of
26 Proceedings is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
27 On May 23, 1978, the City of Renton filed this application
28 for rezone of TADCO' s property from R-3 to R-1.
29 TADCO contends that the application to downzone its property •
30 is arbitrary and capricious and should be denied for the following
31 reasons:
32
MEMORANDUM - 2
LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
1 1. Conditions have not markedly changed in the area since
2 the property was originally zoned R-3, so that a rezone is not
3 required in the public interest.
4 2 . The proposed downzoning would substantially destroy
5 the value of TADCO' s property and constitute an unconstitutional
6 taking without just compensation.
7 3. The burden placed on TADCO outweighs any benefit to
8 the public.
9 4. The decision to eliminate all other property from the
10 application and to rezone only TADCO' s property, results in an
11 inverse spot zone.
12 5. The City failed to comply with the State Environmental
13 Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA) .
14 6 . The action taken by the City Council in adopting the
15 ordinance violated the appearance of fairness doctrine, since
16 City Council member Earl H. Clymar, Jr. , who lives at 526 Cedar
17 Avenue South, the street which was redesignated as R-1 in its
18 entirety on the Comprehensive Plan, thereby changing the use
19 designation of Transamerica' s property, participated in the City
20 Council' s deliberations regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment,
21 and voted in support of that amendment, which resulted in
22 Transamerica' s Cedar Avenue South property being redesignated
23 for R-1 uses only. Moreover, Brian Gain, a Planning Commission
24 member who lives in the Renton Hill area at 2017 Jones Circle,
25 S.E. , participated at all the Planning Commission deliberations
26 and voted to recommend to the City Council a redesignation of
27 Transamerica' s property from R-3 to R-1.
28
29 STATEMENT OF FACTS
30 The essential facts are as follows:
31 The subject property has been zoned for multi-family,
32 medium density use, (R-3) since 1964. TADCO purchased the
MEMORANDUM - 3 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER, McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
], property in 1965 from Puget Western. The purchase price, of
2 course, reflected the fact that the property was then zoned R-3.
3 TADCO has paid real estate taxes on the property since that time
4 at an assessed valuation which takes into account uses permitted
5 under R-3 zoning.
6 The property itself is located on a steep west slope, and
7 is cut up by a drainageway. The steepness of the slopes raises
8 the development cost for the property considerably. According
9 to a November appraisal, the property has a value of approximately
10 $18,000/acre zoned R-3 and only $2, 250/acre zoned R-l. The
11 proposed downzone thus reduces the property' s value to a little
12 over 12% of its previous worth. Property values have substantially
13 increased since the last appraisal, and the present market value
14 of the property zoned as R-3 is approximately $25, 000. 00 an
15 acre. Thus, the proposed downzoning will result in damages to
16 TADCO in excess of $200,000.
17 Access to the TADCO property is along Cedar Avenue South.
18 This street is approximately 27 feet wide. Parking is permitted
19 on both sides of the street. The street dead-ends at TADCO' s
20 property. In 1976, the residents of Cedar Avenue South were
21 surveyed as to their wishes regarding restricting parking on one
22 side of the street. Due to a tie, no restriction was imposed.
23 Since the property has considerable unusable portions, any
24 multi-family use thereon would likely be fairly low density.
25 The development envisioned by a potential purchaser from TADCO
26 called for approximately 90 units, probably in the form of four-
27 plexes. That number may be high, given the nature of the
28 property.
29 A traffic study commissioned by TADCO reveals that the
30 additional development would not unduly add to congestion on
31 Cedar Avenue South; however, it also makes suggestions on the
32
MEMORANDUM - 4 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
1 alleviation of the problem, such as widening the street, restrict-
2 ing parking during peak hours, and making the street one way,
3 with Renton Avenue South one way in the opposite direction.
4 Immediately adjacent and to the north of TADCO' s property
5 is a recently completed eight unit condominium. North of that
6 is the area along Mill Avenue South that was deleted from inclusion
7 in the downzone area. Mill Avenue is narrower than Cedar Avenue,
8 consisting of two one-way levels. This area is more conducive
9 to development, as compared to TADCO's property, as a single
10 family residential area (single family homes make up the bulk of
11 the property use there now. ) There is a multi-family complex at
12 the north end of Mill Street, abutting the TADCO property.
13 • Adjacent to TADCO's property to the west is I-405, and
14 beyond that, Renton' s commercial district.
15 On June 6, 1977, a petition signed by some residents of
16 Renton Hill, which asked that all property on Cedar Avenue South
17 be rezoned to single-family residential, was delivered to the
18 Mayor' s office of the City of Renton. On that same date, the
19 City Council voted to refer the petition to the Planning Commission
20 and Hearing Examiner for review and recommendations.
21 On September 14, 1977, the Planning Commission held a
22 public hearing for the specific purpose of reviewing ,the designated
23 multi-family residential uses in the Renton Hill area where
24 TADCO' s property is situated. TADCO received no notification of
25 that hearing. A prospective purchaser of TADCO' s property did
26 hear of it, and of the petition to redesignate the property on
27 the Comprehensive Plan, and notified a representative of TADCO
28 of this shortly before the hearing date. However, this lack of
29 notice seriously prejudiced TADCO's ability to prepare in a
30 meaningful manner to present its point of view at the Planning
31 Commission hearing.
32 •
LAW OFFICES OF
MEMORANDUM - 5 SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
1 The proponents of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the
2 City knew that TADCO intended to sell its property in the study
3 area for development under the R-3 use classification.
4 On October 12, 1977, after reviewing the staff and committee
5 reports, the Planning Commission, by a 4-2 vote,, recommended to
6 the City Council that the Comprehensive Plan of the City of
7 Renton be amended to reflect only R-1 use in the Renton Hills
8 area.
9 On November 21, 1977, the City Council unanimously voted to
10 change the Comprehensive Plan substantially as recommended by
11 the Planning Commission. The principal difference was the
12 elimination from the rezone property of the area north of South
13 7th Street. The Planning Commission had recommended that the
14 property between Renton Hill and the freeway along Mill Avenue
15 South be downzoned as well. The City Council, in response to a
16 petition submitted by Mill Avenue residents , deleted that area
17 from its Comprehensive Plan amendment. As a result, only about
18 twelve acres are subject to this proposed rezone, over eleven of
19 which are owned by TADCO. Moreover, the property to the north
20 has already been developed into condominiums , and would not be
21 as adversely affected by the proposed downzoning.
22 On December 5, 1977 , after the second and final reading of
23 the ordinance changing the Comprehensive Plan, the City Council
24 gave its final approval to the Comprehensive Plan amendment,
,25 which resulted in designating TADCO' s property for R-1 uses.
26 On December 5, 1977, the City Council also extended a
27 moratorium, prohibiting the construction or alteration of multi-
28 family uses in the Renton Hill area.
29 At no time in the decision-making process did the City
30 Planning Commission, Planning Staff, or the City Council, make
31 the environmental threshold determination required under the
32 State Environmental Policy Act of 1971.
MEMORANDUM - 6 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
1 LAW AND ARGUMENT
2 A. The City of Renton Must Demonstrate That Conditions in
3 Renton Hills Neighborhood Have Changed so Markedly That a Rezone
4 is Required in the Public Interest.
5 An application for a rezoning differs considerably from an
6 original comprehensive zoning action. An original comprehensive
7 zoning action is legislative in nature (Fleming v. Tacoma, 81
8 Wn. 2d 292, 502 P.2d 327 (1972) ) and its validity is to be
9 presumed absent a manifest abuse of discretion (Farrell v.
10 Seattle, 72 Wn. 2d 590, 452 P. 2d 965 (1971) ) . A rezone, however,
11 presents a different standard for consideration. In the recent
12 case of Parkridge v. Seattle, 89 Wn. 2d 454 (January, 1978) , the
13 Supreme Court made the following distinction:
14 "In a rezone action, adjudicatory in nature, the
required relationship to the public interest is not to be
15 presumed as it would be in an original comprehensive
zoning action by the city council, which we have held to be
16 legislative in nature. " (at p. 460) .
17 The Court went on to quote from State ex rel. Synod of Ohio of
18 United Lutheran Church in America v. Joseph, 139 Ohio 229 , 39
19 N.E. 2d 515 (1942) :
20 "In determining whether respondents ' administrative
acts and policies may be upheld, it should be observed that
21 the usual presumption of the validity of the acts of public
boards and officials, does not apply to acts involving the
22 forfeiture of an individual' s rights or the depriving him
of the free use of his property. . . . Applying this exception
23 to a case like the one at bar, where public officials seek
under a zoning ordinance to deny a landowner a particular
24 use of his property, the highest court of Maryland has held
that the board of zoning appeals has the burden of showing
25 reasons sufficient to support its authority in refusing a
building permit. " (Parkridge, pp. 460-61)
26
27 Since this rezoning unquestionably deprives Transamerica of
28 the free use of its property, the City of Renton has the burden
29 of showing sufficient reasons why this rezone should occur.
30 The Court in Parkridge went on to state at p. 463 :
31 "In considering the evidence, we note that (1) there
is no presumption of validity favoring the action of
32 rezoning; (2) the proponents of the rezone have the burden
MEMORANDUM - 7 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER, McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
1 of proof in demonstrating that conditions have substantially
changed since the original zoning, or as in this
2 case, . . . ; and (3) the rezone must bear a substantial
relationship to the public health, safety, morals or
3 welfare. " (Parkridge at p. 463)
4 The facts of the Parkridge case parallel the facts here
5 rather closely. Parkridge owned ten lots near Volunteer Park in
6 Seattle which had been zoned for apartment construction since
7 1959. In 1974, Parkridge proposed developing a 60-unit apartment
8 building on his property. Shortly thereafter, the Seattle City
9 Council passed an ordinance rezoning the area single-family
10 residential. The trial court in that case held that (1) the
11 decision was unsupported by credible evidence, (2) the rezoning
12 resulted in an inverse spot zone, (3) proper procedures had not
13 been followed, and (4) the City failed to comply with SEPA. The
14 Supreme Court affirmed on the first ground, not discussing the
15 other three. After reviewing the record before, in that case,
16 the Seattle City Council, the Court found that the evidence did
17 not
18 " . . . establish that conditions had so markedly changed
that a rezone was required in the public interest. " (p. 462)
19
20 A copy of the complete text of this opinion is attached
21 hereto as Exhibit C.
22 Thus the City of Renton, to sustain its rezoning ordinance
23 at this hearing, must show that conditions in Renton Hills have
24 changed so markedly that the public interest required a change
25 in zoning.
26 B. No Marked Change in Conditions Has Occurred in the
27 Renton Hills Neighborhood Justifying This Rezone Since
28 Original Comprehensive Plan Was Adopted.
29 A review of the Planning Commission Report (on which this
30 rezone application is ultimately based) seems to indicate that
31 Renton' s primary concern is increased traffic in the area of
32
MEMORANDUM - 8 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER, McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
Cedar and Mill Streets. Yet the evidence will show that the
2 Renton Hills neighborhood is not substantially more crowded than
3 it was in 1964 . Access is the same as it was in the mid-
4 sixties. Renton may point to the expanded use of a park on the
5 top of the hill, but Cedar Street is not used by people going
6 there. In short, the evidence will be that no significant
7 change has occurred in the neighborhood calling for the exercise
8 of the City's police power in the form of a down-zone. In 1964,
9 the City evaluated the Renton Hill area in a valid exercise of
10 its legislative " function, and decided that the Hill area should
11 be zoned R-3. TADCO acquired its property in reliance on that
12 determination. Now the City has "changed its mind, " and its
13 reasons for doing so are not related to significant changes in
14 neighborhood conditions. The rezone application should be
15 disapproved.
16 C. The Proposed Rezone is Unconstitutional as a Confisca-
17 tion of TADCO's Property.
18 The general rule is that an ordinance which deprives a
19 landowner of the entire use value of his property is
20 unconstitutional. Anderson 1 American Law of Zoning, § 3. 26,
21 p. 146 , Elmwood Properties, Inc. v. Congelman, 418 F. 2d 1025
22 (7th Cir. , 1969) .
23 "Thus regulations restricting land to residential use have
been held unconstitutional where the value of the land for
24 such purpose has been destroyed or drastically reduced by
. . . adjacent . . . major highways, and by the physical
25 condition of the land. " (Anderson, supra. , pp. 152-3,
emphasis supplied) .
26
27 The evidence will show that the adjacency of Interstate 405
28 and the topographical unsuitability of the land itself combine
29 here to reduce the value of TADCO' s property zoned R-1 to less
30 than 1/10 of its present R-3 zoned value.
31 This is not the typical case, as presented by Mayer Built
32 Homes v. Steilacoom, 17 Wn. App. 558 (1977) , where the landowner
MEMORANDUM - 9 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
•
1 bought the property when it was zoned more restrictively, and
2 fortuitously, the. City subsequently upzoned, then downzoned it
3 again. Nor is it the case presented by Carlson v. Bellevue, 73
4 Wn. 2d 41 (1968) where the landowner himself sought an upzone
5 because of the expansion of commercial uses around his property.
6 TADCO purchased this property while it was zoned R-3 and has
7 paid real estate taxes on it that were based on its R-3-zoned
8 value. TADCO' s valid expectation was that the property would
9 maintain its R-3 classifications and resultant value. Now the
10 City of Renton, by reducing permissible uses to single-family
11 residential, in effect seeks to utterly destroy the value of
12 TADCO' s land.
13 The evidence will show the reason for the reduction in
14 value quite clearly. The topography of the property is such
15 that it is economically unfeasible to put single family homes on
16 it and recover the cost of doing so in the resale price. The
17 steep terrain adds to the building costs, while the low elevation
18 and adjacency to the highway depress the marketability of the
19 finished product.
20 The net effect of the rezone will be that the property will
21 not be developed in the foreseeable future. .This may be what
22 the City of Renton would like; if it is, however, the City
23 should condemn and purchase the property to serve as a perpetual
24 "greenbelt, " and not accomplish its purpose at TADCO' s expense.
25 D. The Examiner Must Weigh the Relative Gain to the
26 Public Against the Limitations on TADCO's Potential Use of the
27 Property.
28 In Carlson v. Bellevue, 72 Wn. 2d 41, 435 P. 2d 957 (1968) ,
29 the Supreme Court set out a series of factors to be considered
30 in passing on a proposed zoning ordinance:
31 "In determining whether or not a zoning ordinance is
reasonable in its application to a given parcel of land,
32 among the factors to be taken into consideration are the
MEMORANDUM - 10 LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
1 character of the neighborhood, existing uses and zoning of
nearby property, the amount by which property values are
2 decreased, the extent to which the diminution of values
promotes the public health, safety, morals or welfare, the
3 relative gain to the public as compared with the hardship
imposed upon the individual owner, the suitability of the
4 subject property for the purpose for which it is zoned, and .
the length of time the property has remained unimproved,
5 considered in the context of the land development in the
area. No single factor is controlling but each must receive
6 due consideration." (Carlson, p. 51)
7 Given the special burden on the City imposed by the Parkridge
8 case, this means that not only does the City need to demonstrate
9 that changed circumstance call for a downzone of TADCO' s property
10 in the public interest, but that the public benefit from that
11 downzone outweighs the hardship imposed on TADCO from trying to
12 adapt its property to single-family use.
13 We are dealing here with a total of 12 . acres of property
14 located immediately adjacent to a large freeway. North of this
15 property a multi-unit condominium has recently been completed;
16 another is located just down the hill at the end of Mill Avenue
17 South. Just on the other side of the freeway is part of Renton' s
18 central business district. The property itself is very steep _
19 and the evidence will show that zoned as R-3, some sort of
20 fairly low density cluster apartment or condominium development
21 of perhaps as many as 90 units would be all it could support.
22 The property is lower in elevation than most of the surrounding
23 neighborhood, and the location is not desirable for single-
24 family residents. The evidence will show, in short, that the
25 property is itself unsuited for single-family use, since the
26 building costs would not be likely to be recovered from the
27 price the property would bring on resale as developed. The
28 drastic drop in value of the property if zoned R-1 (to less than
29 1/10 of the R-3 zoned value) reflects this unsuitability for
30 single-family development.
31 To be compared with this drastic hardship on TADCO is
32 whatever slight benefits will accrue to the Renton Hills area
LAW OFFICES OF
MEMORANDUM - 11 SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666,
from having perhaps 90 less cars use Cedar and Mill Streets.
2 TADCO submits that the hardship to it clearly outweighs any
3 "benefits" to the public.
• 4 E. Rezoning of TADCO' s Property is Arbitrary "Spot" Zoning
5 in That the R-1 Use Classification is Inconsistent With
6 Surrounding Uses.
7 The original comprehensive plan for the Renton Hill area
8 would appear to have been the most suited for the particular
9 concerns of the area. Recognizing that the bulk of the area
10 would be utilized for single-family dwellings, the City Council
11 provided for an R-3 "buffer zone" between the residential areas
12 and I-405 with the adjacent Renton business district. In part,
13 this would be based on the undesirability of land adjacent to a
14 freeway as single-family residential property, as well as the
15 characteristics of the property itself rendering such development
16 costlier than normal.
17 Strangely enough, as soon as TADCO started planning the
18 sale of the property to a developer, for the first time, Renton
19 Hill' s populace became concerned with possible traffic problems,
20 the net result being that TADCO' s property was singled out as
21 the subject of first, a change in the Comprehensive Plan and
22 second, a rezone. (While the validity of the Comprehensive Plan
23 amendment is not being examined here, it cannot be logically
24 separated from the rezone application itself. In short it is
25 apparent that the "amendment" was made specifically in order to
26 obtain this rezone. )
27 "Spot" zoning has not been extensively considered in
28 Washington other than in the context of rezoning of small
29 parcels benefitting the subject property, e.g. , Pierce v. King
30 County, 62 Wn.2d 324, 382 P.2d 628 (1963) . However, where, as
31 here, only a small number of adjacent or nearby property owners
32 are benefitted, spot zoning may also be found. See 1 Anderson
LAW OFFICES OF
MEMORANDUM - 12 SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
1 American Law of Zoning, (2nd Ed. ) §§ 5. 08-5. 18 (1968) . The.
2 "benefit" involved need not be simply profit (Sonneland v. City
3 of Spokane, 4 Wash. App. 865, 484 P.2d 421 (1971) ) . Here, only
4 the residents of Cedar Avenue South receive any "benefits" in
5 the form of their perceived protection from additional traffic
6 congestion. Significantly, the Mill Avenue South area, which is
7 still zoned R-3 would suffer from increased traffic congestion
8 as much if not more (given the nature of that street) were that
9 area developed for multi-family housing. The only distinction
10 between Mill Avenue and Cedar Avenue is that TADCO planned to
11 sell to a developer, and similar plans were not in the works for
12 the Mill Avenue property. Such a criterion is clearly discrimi-
13 natory and arbitrary, and is an insidious form of "spot" zoning.
14 F• Other Arguments.
15 TADCO recognizes that its other arguments concerning the
16 appearance of fairness and compliance with SEPA are directed
17 more toward the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan amendment
18 than to this application for a rezone. Obviously any rezoning
19 pursuant to an invalid Comprehensive Plan amendment is itself
20 invalid; however this hearing will not of itself affect the
21 amendment' s validity.
22
23 CONCLUSION
24 The evidence will reveal no significant change of circum-
25 stances in the Renton Hills neighborhood supporting a downzoning
26 of TADCO' s property. In fact, downzoning to single-family use
27 in effect renders development of the property at all economically
28 unfeasible in the foreseeable future, destroying its value for
29 all practical purposes. Downzoning thus constitutes an
30 unconstitutional taking of property without due process of law.
31 Furthermore, the burden imposed on TADCO outweighs any minimal
32 gain to the general public from the downzone. Finally, the R-1
LAW OFFICES OF
MEMORANDUM - 13 SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES S. BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
•
1 classification is inconsistent with surrounding uses, to the
2 benefit of only a small number of nearby property owners. For
3 these reasons the proposed downzone should be rejected.
4 DATED this / day of June, 1978.
5 SHIDLER, McBROOM, GATES & BALDWIN
6 By _Ca,�,�vt(
,
7 Ja es R. Irwin
8 gez.444:ei `
i2ey
By
9 David H. Binney
10 D7/1
DHB:cz
11 6/8/78
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFFICES OF
MEMORANDUM - 14 SHIDLER, McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
• EXHIBIT B
1
2
3
4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTONFOR KING COUNTY
5
6 TRANSAMERICA DEVELOPMENT )
COMPANY, a California )
7 corporation, )
8 Plaintiff, ) NO. 838 799
9 -vs- )
10 THE CITY OF RENTON, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER
) MODIFYING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
11 Defendant. )
12
13 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties
hereto, through their undersigned attorneys, that the Order on
14 Show Cause entered in this matter by the above-entitled court on
the 11th day of January, 1978, may be amended. That Order
15 provided that (1) The writ of certiorari issued on December 27 ,
1977, to the City of Renton be confirmed; (2) All proceedings
16 pertinent to the amendment of the comprehensive plan for Renton
Hills, including zoning hearings, be stayed and prohibited until
17 the final determination herein; (3) All moratoria on the construction
of multi family structures in Renton Hills be stayed and pro-
18 hibited until the final determination herein; and (4) Plaintiff
post an injunction bond in the amount of $500 . 00 .
19
The parties agree that the stay of proceedings should
20 be lifted so as to allow the City of Renton to conduct necessary
rezoning hearings, subject to the plaintiff 's right to request :
21 that all of the initial records for the comprehensive plan change ,
plus any records from the land use hearing examiner 's decision
22 in the zoning action', together with followup City Council action,
be certified to the superior court for consolidated review. It
23 is further understood by the parties that such an order would
impose an obligation' upon plaintiff not to make application for
24 a building permit or any other substantial development permit
until the zoning hearings and subsequent City Council actions
25 thereon have been finalized.
26 DATED this day of February, 1978 .
27 SHIDLER,•- ,,cBROOM, GATES • DWIN PAIN , & WARREN
28 BY: L 1 ,�,, ��
29 •, Craig V. ©-ntz Lawrence J. W rren
.. 7ittorrteys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant
30
•
31 Stipulation & Order
Modifying Stay of
32 Proceedings - 1
LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES E. BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223.4666
1 ORDER
2 BASED UPON THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the stay of proceedings
3 hereinbefore entered on January 11, 1978, is modified to allow
the defendant, The City of Renton,to immediately convene a zoning
4 hearing relative to the reclassification of plaintiff 's property
from R-3 to R-1. This modification is contingent upon fulfillmen•
5 of the following covenants or conditions by the parties:
6 1 . If plaintiff's land is rezoned pursuant to the
above-mentioned zoning hearing and subsequent approvals of de-
fendant 's City Council, that decision and the entire administra-
tive record associated therewith will automatically be deemed
8 part of the record,of the instant appeal, and will be consolidate.
therewith for purposes of trial;
9
2. If plaintiff 's land is not rezoned pursuant to the
10 above-mentioned hearings and subsequent actions of defendant 's
City Council, defendant's moratorium on the construction of
11 multi family structures on plaintiff 's property will be immedi-
ately revoked by defendant' s City Council;
12
3. Plaintiff will not apply to defendant for a
13 building permit or any other substantial development permit until
the zoning hearings and subsequent City Council actions thereon
14 have been finalized: Provided, however, that plaintiff may make
application or applications for building or substantial develop-
15 ment permits prior to the termination of the zoning hearings
upon receiving written consent therefor from defendant.
16
DONE IN OPEN COURT this day of . , 1978 .
17
18
JUDGE
19
Presented by
20 SHID , McBROOM, G• ° • .SWIN
21
s kV"
ig VFW
22 Attorneys for Plaintiff
23 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND NOTICE OF PRESENTATION WAIVED:
PAIN ,&. WARREN
24 �
a:_ z7,
wrence J. W rJ�en
26 Attorneys for 'befendant
27
28
29
30
Stipulation & Order
31 Modifying Stay of
Proceedings - 2
32
LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER.McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
Jm.1978 STATE v.B. 467
89 Wn.2d 467
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in both cases.
WRIGHT, C.J., and ROSELLINI, HAMILTON, STAFFORD,
UTTER, BRACHTENBACH, HOROWITZ, and DOLLIVER, JJ.,
concur.
June 13, 1978
L. Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner
Renton City Hall
Z00 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Dear Mr. Beeler:
I have prepared this information for your use as a
guideline for our presentation at the public hearing
this morning. This information is not meant to provide
conclusions, but only to share with you the many factors
we have defined and taken into consideration in deciding
what our position should be.
We request a change in zoning of the property in question
from R-3 to R-1 . We also request that no additional access
be provided through the Renton Hill area. We will discuss
this in detail during our verbal presentation. We also
request that all streets on Renton Hill that are currently
designated dead end be permanently designated as "dead end-
no thru street" with additional "watch for children" signs
on appropriate streets.
We concur with the recommendations of the Planning
Department and feel ;they have arrived at a solution we
can live with.
We are willing to provide any other information you
might require to help in your decision-making process. My
phone number is given below for your convenience.
REtEatrat
art OF RENTON
NEARING EXAMINER':
JUN 131978 Ph
Sincerely, AM
718 9,I9,1hl2al.213►4'51f
Kathy Keolker, President
Renton Hill Community Association
532 Cedar Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
255-0936 /a
EXHIBIT„bri"�
EX.��I ,�T NO.
ITEM NO. r.. ��
RENTON HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Concerns for our neighborhood ,
1. Traffic Volume - The numbers of vehicles using Renton Hill
streets cause severe congestion at times. An increase in
traffic volume would be impossible to handle. The following
traffic counts are from city records.
1972 - The pipeline road was open during the Boeing slump.
Count taken on S. 3rd east of Mill for 24 hours.
Results: Eastbound - 1279. Westbound - 1466.
1973 - The pipeline road was closed. Same location for
24 hours.
Results: Eastbound - 716, Westbound - 831 .
When the pipeline road was open, traffic volume dramatically
increased and residents requested closure of the road due
to the many, other problems caused by the increase in traffic.
2. Parking - On street parking is mandatory for most residents.
Those who have garages have realized that they were not
built for modern day cars.
3. Street Width - The streets are not adequate for safe passage
of two cars going opposite directions unless one pulls over
to the side to allow the other to pass. According to city
ordinances, residential streets must be at least 50 feet wide
and neighborhood collector streets at least 60 feet wide.
Cedar Avenue (where the proposed development would be) has
a 40 foot right of way but the actual street width is only
26 - feet. Cedar Avenue was improved with an L.I .D. last
year and we are now paying for a new, substandard street
because there is simply not enough room to widen the street.
4. ' Access - Although we have only one access, past experience
has shown that another access creates more problems for us .
than it solves. It makes our community a thoroughfare for.
residents: in other areas and causes extreme congestion.
We prefer to live• with just one access.
Page 2
Renton Hill concerns
5. , Safety - Pedestrian safety is adequate if there is a single
access point. Fire safety is assured by a mutual aid agreement
with Fire District #40 who will come through the 'gate at the
top of the Hill if the city is unable to respond.
6. Alleys - Alleys are inadequate to develop for major use due
to width, grade and no right of way through many back yards.
7. Crime Rate - At the present time we enjoy the lowest crime
rate in the city of Renton. There is rarely a serious
disturbance on the Hill. From the records of the Renton
Police Department, the following are .the last statistics
kept on crime rate by neighborhood.
1976 Number of calls
January 9
February 10
March ' 14
April 12
May 6
June 11
July 18
TOTAL - 7 months 80 calls
Most of these complaints were nuisance calls i.e. kids throwing
rocks, cars parked over 24 hours,. etc. In comparison with
other areas for the month of July, the Highlands had 36 calls
and the downtown area had 94 calls. Renton Hill had 14 less
calls in 7 months than the adjacent downtown area had in one
month. Since the Hill is directly adjacent to the downtown
business district, it is unusual to have such a low crime rate.
8. Children's Safety- Since there is no other access, our children
enjoy the safety of knowing most of the people who come on
the Hill. Unfamiliar cars are easily spotted and there are
few strangers.
9. School Bussing - There is no elementary school within walking
distance of Renton Hill so the children catch the bus from
the park at the top of the Hill. The Renton School District
;.. . 'will not allow its buses to run on the Hill because it is
Page 3
Renton Hill concerns
too dangerous because of the steep grade. It is unsafe for
children to wait for the bus at the bottom of the Hill due
to the railroad track and the traffic. A surge in population
would compound the bussing problem.
10. Property Value - The Hill has become a desirable place to
• live due to the character of the neighborhood, our single
family status and our view property. There are few vacant
houses which adds to the safety and appearance of the neighborhood.
11 . Quality of the Neighborhood - We feel nothing will be gained
by changing the quality of the neighborhood by the addition
of multi-family housing. We have a very unique neighborhood.
It is old, well established and has historical value. In
fact, a picture of one home is shown in the book Renton -
From Coal 'To Jets. There are many second and third generation
families on the Hill today which is unusual in our highly
mobile society. There is pride of ownership which shows up
in the vast remodeling activity on the Hill. People choose
to keep an older home and restore or remodel it because they
like, living on Renton Hill and they are unable to duplicate
the atmosphere in another neighborhood. We are one 'of the
oldest residential communities in the city and we are proud-
that our homes have, stood the test of time. There is value
in repairing old homes rather than tearing them down to build
new ones. Unlike many older neighborhoods, ours is being
revitalized and is not deteriorating.
12. Quiet - We have a quiet and peaceful neighborhood which is
no small accomplishment considering our proximity to, the
downtown area, Interstate 405 and the railroad tracks.
13. Community Facilities - Philip Arnold Park is adequate to
provide for our needs and is used by many residents in the
city. But the addition of apartment complexes would seriously
over-crowd the park..
Page 4
Renton Hill concerns
14. Public Works - We have concern that our sewer and drainage
systems could not withstand the strain of providing for the
needs of a large increase in population.
The points we have listed are only guidelines to help you
understand how we feel about Renton Hill and the many concerns
we have weighed to formulate our position. We hope this will
be of help to you in making your decision about the future of
Renton Hill.
, t.t.'-. ',,•34.‘,• ,*.-'4:' '.1.4 4 ' L
• PETITION
1 1 '
3 7
•
We, the undersigned residents and propertyowners of Renton
Hill, hereby petition the City of Renton to rezone Cedar
Avenue South in its entirety for single family dwellings,
excepting those multi-family units currently in existence.We petition for this change based on the followings
1 . The traffic pattern, accessibility, street width
and parking are not adequate to provide for the extra -
congestion caused by the addition of multi-family dwellings.
We have enough difficulty now without adding to the problem.
2. Our property is considered "view property" and
we do not wish to forfeit our views by allowing apartments
to locate in our neighborhood. All of us take pride in '
. our homes and many have gone to considerable expense (both
in time and money) to improve and modernize our older homes. •
Our neighborhood is a quiet place to live and we intend to - - - - ---
keep it that way.
Respectfully submitted,
The residents of Renton Hill
on Cedar Avenue South
DATE • NAME ADDRESS
4 I Yr )),P74-Z-IIC-.. , j--)D.CP CEI-)4R trtSta r0s4,1LN
•
f.„ ,2 re if/71/60o ,4/71/V,
•
//,2 / 7 7
, 0-2.fi ±-1-4,-2.4-d-• _4___,c_4„4_,L, 't.,(„V 2 d._.,,,,,..„, -
• gel Cza1 "VZ 5
6/ /7 ? h,kA, k- VkkAA III . 0-)r,v,Aols . 3scs coda( A-0, S . Cbrctioh)
bp/7 ) iltA 1- ‘,i4 ivi getivildcis I n. C 90 A c1( litl-t IlL. S; 02,Axu„.
il
I q/77 fil/i .:t lh/o , Th_, 1,c,, ,. ,<;!O:'2.IL), 53,--) C.cd Cbul do
. f)
(c) 6 /77 An •)
cll
/
c /2--177 //,/e 14 frzu, Ii 4: 01,a, 46 d
n
7 7 CY"a H 0,-- -- • I,K)7; • L-7, 7'1' cC,71
r (117 0.
I ; P; /(,L if C
/ 3 / / : / • ) 771/ :,,
05
. ,
t • • ,. •
l‘ ,
. . „ . .
. .
•
. . . • -"
PETITION . PAGE 2 ,. " . ':.•:.. . ,:',. .- . , ,........... • , . •• . . . . .: : ;.'...:.• • ,:.,,',:..,. i :. ..: ..,. .
. . . .
. . .
• ..... • ••
DATE • NAME • • : • ,.. • ' ADDRESS •• * .1. . ••• ' •, '.'-!:,7'.':- •
.."... .:.
•
, • /.9/2 7 . 0. ,je/A,•id,t4.4:7 4 ./71) C&DIA g- A-Vg-.. 5z5.., . .-... .• :.•:...- .
. 64-127 -rn 0,1,5 lf 1 d 1 CV 'i'DOL-il_ni I__Oki,.' . ._.1:3.I 0 C_FPCFP .4:U P=.-9:). .."::::. ::?:•• :..,:.•i-
•
, ' Z/r 7-r-L. ci ck.-... l•-• A L.,....... Sc, • . . . .. .
.4 -= . 4 ._ • .
. . ..„. .,.„
f eff.04.F•ip k up
- es.4,--P0_ J e„..,e...,k, er .... . S"a . . .. .." .. •
. (31-4414 Z-4- /0/-e -aAl) 1/Z•AIa 4) .Q - i .-
•. . .• •. .
a -
. .;-.)72- 7 "-rz;". o'-/-1..cji -) . • ,‘. . 1,0/_, ..... 5.-wy - .. a-c,te- .. •
, b 77 i 7_ ,,Y&e 2;1/ 'ti.,,-- -zee•-• • - . i/ • , dZ/e; for' 1 , .
. ,
t)---,J -7 7 /-r r. ,, • . 11 . , . .
. .., , ...
. .
. ,
b _ - ) 9 •,,- ,,(7 av ) . , .., ,e,er,-- ..5-:)..5- . .. S. ,b, -
-72 0-. 4.t.i.,)_(-W .5--(5i ceciA,die.cy. • • ••• .
rcy 001 o ) 1-2 • .c-ci) - ead,to giue. 6,
( . 1 .- J -r• ' ,aii . Ilt.
0/1 • . .
I ( 1 ? i.... •
• .
. . .
.. : .
!) - \--\. N.,. ,\MX‘ -r--)2,1:2)C-5-(\ n\ V)k. . - -. -..:•:-•;:l... .: .
. •
' • // . . 4-C;1
, , . •
.e
. .. .. , ,. .
,. ,. . • .
_fite_ __-772 ,„.,:,,,4_:,z -e-----Le- . - •n 3 a g4,... .a. r_ a___<./-e, :. _,...Z.-- . :, •
( , ,
7//1, hip!„„( ,.A JA:e.,1
zi; _ .. •
. . • ,.. .
/-. .c// ,,P,a-,,,.../ „,/,4,- . , . ... : , : ,..•
c;,...2 c „„ae.) y,d......4...._.(ik.,. u. • if it Y. - • -•--`2-- `2it-•
(.3,4(e.,15
4. .7 It/ 77.7-247 6 0, `A ) . 3 if. C"e‘el,7 '7;6,i,,.,_"...5". '
- . ,
4riAlvrs 7..„ 7,e.1 L - .'1," i. it. .,/-2/4,A., 64.2-e._. .1. -*. • 1.,1-4-1,-..-/ • •
.....s--.0 Lti&
• • AI / 4.'' . .
4 I 417 '... .. eL•ra idb -=I: 5/---A--'
....... A- ...1., I1P (.,
, 6 -2., lik eo-A.,,i . 4,--Ar , ., , . . - . ge9,..i e:,z.,_.• e)'-'H I_ ...• az-,.0 2
q-• Qi ' (, ,1/ tfr--4..,-,v4--- 2 - 4--S .3 62-4.7 &A,. 5-
6-02- TCI'.. ,...4. .--./f e_e_,1_,A__} d_c_. AP
. .
....../.....,,
... _.........
PETITION PAGE .4) : .
DATE NAME /' ADDRESS
/ 7:-,,
�. -"7 � ems_ 0 X ��5ee,* .
LV3/7 7 I// 7 i Og: -3. 7 &/1ll l/ am. _
6 1, 2jah a 3 a`4 & ; 6-u.e. Jo .
1 * cO, ai,.0 .62
J/ /77 �1'" - � � 3 q
o./; 7 7re —
411,7 dere- 1.6":41et7--"..../ * / g eina7/( ---
(a /7 .3 ;.-2
''4_qt-e-/-6-V) 3,,27 C2e3e c y_ ..__tZ7• -:,e j
4 /79 �� l 1 3-'�, /e. o�q0 -- S45/77 /,7)./ri,-K- Aer2e44-, &3/
>n.Cj._ ,i 67/7
(1 3)73 . 'I/ 56IIN AQ ; .S 5 Ce-e-444 4 = i‘
o r 7 S-75-.0,,i p4dapcio' .3�: '7 ? i% Atm. so'
y' I . 4 ,. � ,3,)8' /(3,r p)j ro r-e)
ce.14 say CA-PIO ive C
ee.eia- t) ' 4 - -;--`/- idr-
,..,,,7, , 2_ _
-ram G/x)".�.�,��',� . C'r.,. .S'�.
%/ /) 4Ifr/ .
ii'. //(-':l;(, , ,q,-- :9,i) ,bra„i/ -;.e ivt.7--.:_
. .• r1n�
We the ut: , �rsigned residents and prc, - .rty owners of fpp�P
• yRenton Hill wish to express, our opposition to the building '
of any additional multiple dwellings at .the upper end of
Cedar Avenue South. We also oppose the zoning, planning
Dr building of multiple dwellings or industrial concerns .
in any other area of Renton Hill, or any adjacent area that ,
might require access or right of way. through our community.
Our basic reasoning for the above opposition is that
we are concerned about increased traffic, congestion, park— . .
ing problems, noise pollution, crime against personal property
and any other difficulties that arise from sudden large pop—
ulation increases within a given community.
We wish to make this opposition known to any and all
interested parties. .
... = Na„ - Address .....�
•
7-- i 7- '.0 /> ,, C
,...,,, ,74te ,Ze, -.73,
1
../ ,' ./ 1 •1 i rf. . / ,/ `-..ram �/aim4 ,
: 77- 77 . Efaginirli.„Pf (o / �- -t �..� _so: . .
.. , . .
.4.2.,„/ - .. I
._...2c
l
7/<9 77 UMW' - -
lir --- ,ea..o.,(.,-._6 .
471 9177 - - P . , -3,5�
.7/1:14./. 1 . .)lici i 0 ,.,,,„„, , ,_.„ :
4ej i \1'''I illiMERTI. . A-66-,' • 3-? / •
4'24/....z.. . .• .„ .,_ . il , 6. /
j / l
'/ I/." , Z '% i/ "�'� '�. �, f,� ^`w it/ �j4 S?
r ,
A W�
`
\\\\\\\\\\\\
%//////
ROLL NO .
END OF Svc— 'tezons
ROLL 7
OF R �
A
ti sr �3 o THE CITY OF RENTON
..•, ..,-<' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
`',�: o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 0 DELORES A. MEAD
094. co' CITY CLERK
O,01TFO SEPleE#Q
CITY OF RENTON )
COUNTY OF KING )
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
I , being duly sworn on
oath depose and say:
That the papers and documents appearing on this roll of
film were done in normal course of a working day and
documents are true and correct copies of the originals. That
the microfilming of the papers and. documents as aforesaid
was done pursuance of, and in conformance with provisions of
the statures in these cases made provided for as they appear
in RCW 40.10. 010 of the Revised Code of Washington.
(signed)
l
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of_ ;
l9 . ` .
cp111 S v,.l
. el 77:„ Atrieik;';‘'ii .
• d a , Qnnr i ,�J3�i+i i'.
Notary Public• in ea,
% P 7.\ y- ` tate
of Washington, resid�,Ed1 , ..,;,,` 4 ng County,
Washington. ° ,�. "
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
.0111110
' /0.2rirrg 41111P
•es, ....ajp.y
• 4144/
goo L , ,-�
•° ()1 . AA G L,-r7
Date 1 Name Address ,_.;: : ;:.
I . �/ 17 'J� - _ -0 i - / �nS 7'‘. -- d2 ' • .S''•., -:<
I. .1..1 1Z1..• 77 . .egaits4 • 7e‘ &441 , . •:f.='' ':'ofiVf%17
. • 7 i _ ,, 91A.:-.4,p4-77a4aL.----
i.
.„ • ': el/4,,07 (ZY 4 • . . ,,-,'::,,'s.144'
eo 6 -Letfit....ez-“-- X2Ve.. .7'.,-Srx -,,,,,,
t' • ' O 'off'/ 7 ' ��� �� .,c t__. 4/a )1(.t'QGLc�__&' �'-76/` 44
•
P:14d_ 1 , ,
I. �U "-�v-7� • >• . , l�'�� ,•, k :
: �_ � �--•�7rpe � 1� -- G ' ':ass:
t' �_I .1,'. g_ q - 2 ' 7€..7". 1 ..A/, „gt..-oelt-ete,,„g_Lq'' - 7vC CJ _ ••s
•
"!! 7!1 J l 1 Y .lam •:2•.: 1,4,11 r.
-..,:- •._ ,;,,. . - .
7
i'.... . :. r--t4s, i.. 7. -..-ei,Z • /i-/.6zetie •• • t :: :::---, 1:::...: •:::;.14
•
�-aA1- ?? 451.,61,.
• .. • 7Q A C� 1•.;;;r�,
,:a� ,
;,..:::' . .-..:::: a,_99
' 7 • � JLJJL . li . , A ..H2• 7 . • O j., r3
t.
i.: Y..i.: 1-2I-: '1'1 I ,. 4k,,
entt,i.2 iiiiiXib• YOtgbfcm, -•
1.: 7
...., fr i 4,-1.., •• k_, 76 (7
. ,f----,.; ,:,......„1:,
1.:'!!-:‘..,:l. :: 01-c2.5.'7 7 \ • - ... • .
g-'4s= /
• f , /3 G 2 y .,1 c'. tea.. �`i .. ;4
'�f?h=77 ' C 7/ r: •,;
f+� = � :27 • : � � �I
.�
E:- 1 . / �s�� J}:�° e-a�-rn • & 1,h � :� 6 Soy - k� th: �� . � . ��
t' . J-2J- 7? �A �,.lA /-74.zv.si'- frV I :-A9ev rGY�/�l.
1: • Y 47- .4.,.1.. 77 . *-24,:p 49:a..tichaixt, Pc /". ...4 74r,..../eArziy.Y.„
(, .:. ,
.4. ..:. :,,s....,„?,..1....7.7 • .•
. :. . . .:t.Vt7t,..:It''L
•
�� • wy
� _
�� . , lvnme Address ;. :,;;TM!,74;
.: (h•4d/ /& 77 -�,,v
_eaeAli 1 la 4041..) .
r+. p�-•CAI^''J ^ ^ , `'•"���:
L C6,1
ll � 1 11 Llpfrazt42.t.41__ it • - -.‘.A-t'tt;.
1 ! `�z
61- )16 :c&P-fi-tk--i .
.l E AVcl�d _ , l0 d J- ,fie 1 /7 P4-- CY •:;F ``
,�� di . i' / Oa4rt., a o . l(Ohl /9ULC � ' - -„k
_ - Ar . ,,,...0_ Au' --' _ _:;,- ,••• - 4.ir . Air _ :_. Ni......s.-:• :.'''-r.a
. ....„‘ fr . if , e A-I li p I II III lip 0r,,_/*MOIR IIIMI • .• ,,iv ic,'.4,i411
%
V P
ails
-' S' . - 18' -7, C..1209- zw.412. adOthael_z4) .,/ c:A0 - ae," .,':.:',,.-, -,--q:,..,..11
J 90 7t :•T.c In
, ':a_16....-7.7 7ifsh_ gL4.„-- 70 `,6 ett-ot-.- 1 • , :;•.•,,4•7_,;1,4
•
-.. -&Q P 9/c9 6D S. '�
. .. -IA -77 , Q-iatd--6ti-dcAt,i-n, P-1-1-71} .
"?6 (a e4.i.,A, ai,Le . 4,) . . :' r .=.4'it,-,:.!-?.4
. F.. .......i v.... _7
ew , i/.d . _ . c--
g _ i,
•_ z 1 OR ///�� 7 r.
0 s 1r�7[ . l I J,334: i
rr// iltAte.._...../ 70 g 44; dy LLIB'. , :`- _;.,7 71 < 11L f�// 7 v 1 `�2C�d L eve`c•
'• -',
(a.(.1-6./K.tet.k. _e- C1')‹. -,N1
:` -4 •`77 o ., -&4.� • ;f.;4!
8 4-4- -9"
';C�„ ,h
'r; 1,..-79/ 4 4 .--,,,h/,.. / . ,.::.•,,;.::::.:,-,.,. -:.,,,sw.
--77re,:v. -r-i4-.2.4. ,...._, .e'// G-')... ..., /Ail ...g,• . /r- y . -
6-';:151.1.--- 77 , 4 --,, s- gie_46.,,t
S a , ,ej_,../!o�i
-Y=
•
• .a.te. - ' , - Name - - Address •
• 1, Q ' (i (g ;,�, ... .>16
. .
• 8 - 17- 77 , :°-' Z coy ' _ 1
R— — \ qvwic_,Latuaz ) 9iQ �1 Q t .
17 77 1. {mot
rJ 7 '1'y \ , 40 % -• ; ' ! ‘ _ 21/5 .A. ... .
" t. - go7 �_ )„. a4_ ,,4-.. • • ' .
/ 1 _77 • . . .. -i : ._ - :.
o 'ILfro -
,y - / 7- 1 1- _, • ili‘L ' .. -XO./. 4;i:/er-1-4_aai.. 4--, ./:'
cl.! ----/-) - /7 _ . -/ 22O. .ti,-e ., Qom,,
. - I .7- 17 4.:ce:,;,4.•_,„_. _.....4-y„.v.,(/ -,
......, -
r-
6 ,, .///,
- /7 7 T. L�liuf6.,I// ?3 2<2, 6 7 o.,.(
. . t.- / 7- 7 7 IA ,,7r_ • /44-x_.r �g rl- I ;
l•7- 77 C7/a--- 4_: .. _ .3s`- 2(,-e.
2 - 11- 71'1 • 5 \ Qa . .� . 5 c Q s�.
, e) 17— f 7 ;YY1..�-� - A3 ��w Gam- S o
- - Fr /7- 77 7/-il- _A -. ,i-C -..„ iigrApaz.te2.0./:
q - Z0 '16- • s6 /-i r.erw a-:-r.- - ,46-- -
- /r", 26) ' 7 . , -2, - - ./. -, ... e.,.:. . ._. , . /___;i7..,4,_ . ,, ,z_ .. . .. ..
' SV-3,if/ si 7 '. --,, __:Z. _. EL,,C.,,,_ - _,;, '' _T--,Li.-44-, A.,-,7-A, _,-) 74i,e, , <
/-. /17 7 ' a," .hdizia. 4.4.z... -1-kjote;-z_e_ 3 /:' .-X.e,),r,..._- _,?..: . th ,. -
/ ' `/ ��/G?7 , 4-30-4,----/-A,. .4 , ,. -cam. .at+
. • PP 77 .. .. . ' & ' to-aii4, , c .-,/,,-, : - .,..--2---.4 _ : ia4 4 )0, .-'-:
4_,, 3) v '2-� .� Arm c
F• [ - 7.7. ..e-a-,. oc, c,f) c-ezd-,:.t 3 i o / -►-i-Z C--oz ,1 S•
F, 2 I - 1., • ' • . _ . 6). ( . 3, ,6 1-1- _ . ?`z C' --
. . .1' ' 2 I -s ? ) • . • t9 -R) '. -. ' . 3(97 k_FA,tiy ) 1-1,(s.„ L . 6
'3 --Z/ -7 c z , ,�f 67,% a.- Gxi-e... S a
! ._ -,2i --- 7 7 4/4112/. "4: k. , /./g2 -2;2.9 . azre_
• .• -- -Irt --11 . )1--i( tiNit-flk Lii . . - ' . rid• -
• ,,,4;.&,,....,Tr. ici 1 -y)./, ..;,,,,, ,,,- -7,( ,%,_&___-__fr. • -‘ /-2 /
.„-x_ c• -7 :•,-., /- �: �, �� -;,.�'� . 3 4 0 `�d- iec A : . o
. • Q.
.i,
y L� 0 s ill ( fi t L.I_ _9, I - ()41
' f _.1. 5 .4-- 47 .7-/-7, i ) arifir.vx.7 ivzra-j-L L., 1_. - ,r.)1 - (1-1 \
A i r y r) 4,I",,5/ . Cve:; ' 11---7 •;y77-
Gl-fil
fey v� A" mcd).,cTo�c9 962_5/ dy)-ciU ---0 orivro Lib _ At _3 :
Ad4oli ki 07 --viv-Pv--e-p_5-1 17 ( . y,,,,p L :4 -8/ -8 ,.
,,,v,, 1-47--0--,-----dw ____,7/ 7 ,:--„,4cL-2-_,,,,--i2/ _ ' -,(Y/- ,-:
O iv '•��l(l 1�6,'y s,s •r� - .'�
:7-- --r-YrP47V a "--9 T /I:117-0 W--iL;(4 • L 2 --S /-4) :.
r am` 09, .'- 'k —"- L 4 - AT,'
L -.. , 9/ q • rne T
' 1 44 -N--6
S - ( ,s, ? jra L( -illS (tQ. I
d1M-/ . ; 7Z �/--2 .
3�`�' y /ZJ L. 4 8i S '
. b ,vvy ,.- -. • 417, w sr , - --, z 4. -- 7 —.(
�� Jig s/ ',Y.:, - . . _ /�.n • !
(' E - s/ zy. :7-z. CC - 9/- S'
,. - .
rr
..;:• '-S Avp _. c-c ,9 ' ii--17yr 'if in//vv BZ, -/ 49, ) -35 , ,i!
ii,1021
O''''- . (1 rr0 41151-. 3 • ...:':)
,Ps• 2 ri-c-0-7 17---dy 5- r'A 7- „---7---r--,---3----7,-,-y 't•or- ---- --47-1--r< i 4. -4 i- g ' ::.:..
.,t -L- v J Se «r- 7 MY1"'- GL -/3I - ..i.'l-
iilVdt'6r/521fii
r� [Y-QR7 '
( ,
gi_ 13 ...
"r'Jiro- Q b ç - 4 z - S 1- .:
7 ua ac -5 a�-ei 1-6,6lar. Lag (21 `4r''__ Lz. -&(-& .. .„
.„ • ,,,,A0/5
, ,_:,
sseappv 8are el.oa
' iate . r7 — Name Address •
• `� �P - / i' _la, / / /L�() 4, :P(244,141/1
F - - 77 C-,el-k; die -<id /L,11/ 6„__&,)
g — (44— 77 . . izi. s P /1- . 4d/4// e 6 jin.h -
--- aL -77 r poq ,S _ 3 ,.0 1
j- zq-7 7 '. ..e-6 5 i C__:,;---/-)--, /20 s? se . -3,G) fr. Aurn.0-
2- . 1- 77 ! I/ aJt e ic) 0. ,C,ac c.cficl /4e S' uo & .� err:
4:,....,_ _1. 7 7 ,?;i1C, „....7 . . .--,---,- _ ./..,. //- ...i .::. --t-...c „LI- iffifZ
k., 9-9 Ailyv - za7i c:
,,
,i,29I 77 0 a. . - ,2.3 Li 5 3 / s+ adriv_
sSr/c.-2. 1')7 'g_21,-)-7_ ‘L---72,__L___ae,e7,- --- i-2g5- ,-T-1-,-z-ewit--69-d_*.,
3_j, 5/1 ;�°� D DO /2v5 ... .0 . s-qrci 6t2-. ,fie7771(n-
f a 1-/ 77 Y32 ;,`2,e , t3, /^ -0 ? W ,1P, -
n S 77 .47 - 2I /, o 7l6 � u s - le .
J
v-a 5"-- 77 7/77a-'//f / i , 0 2 ,,aa/, -'47 ,. _),o 5 ,Pca.
x I --) (L 1 �� /p.9 _ s . •�- ' • QoJ .:
, s-, --)--) (LA.:A y, a
i o 62,10,J , s -,2_,_,K,. . ..
67 . ,f- '7-7 ,i,t._.-C,- ( ___-caf-..2../ to' _Al-,-;.?L (1-,4-e Z. dVx,..;-u-ti-3
. T- --> .-- 7 7 ii-aA4 0 HiSt 0/ sft:,./if A 0:- 5o 1--, ..;,i i e..,i
q cy 7 )(2 _.‘:,_,--,-I- ...-e-
.ac C., 'l�e't t3:i
';)- -.1. - .7 ? . . dha-e-L.-7:-/CiW, ' ye/ -7,7Z-fl d__;,-c --g gi-12,-?:)-7
•
7 _ ��..�,r- �` -,- �- , �:, 0 fikijI hvim. §'v Rot. -I-6 f
• .. 7
� � `� 5 rye`' `.k.a a.Cl`t �c�,
rf 7
1� ,
,tie.:4'.-.1.- -..(K,:-.7: z..: 7/ •Z`•."4.,: L:_-.,2<:2_, !:./(.'4 ,/,ii?:i;),./,„tr-g,t,,,..e
`1 - ' • 7 7 •'r,.-.;.4,,.0:�.i. z.:.I (7L,,-/;�,,,L. � c• :r
7
1✓b- — 7 7 --: 7r &,0— ILA ,- c.)L. V� S.
*' 2-22- 78 z4 HA.
W. QavaD _
��. E. eovND 75'Z
„1" -
i I ; / -/
___„--z-I____< ,- ___, 1.- 2,2.2--
•
. :Z5-73
_ ____ 3.__„1 . i_s-r. _. _,.< ' -<'`-; .e Ze<'-. .-- -7:ive4.
'.- -j.' ;7� j
1
I II
�� 124 dd�tp?b�_ •- .1 1 �
I LIT" 12\ 2-2L-78
1 .I\ ' . 2 4 Ht.MIA
1 . J I
I I • II II
I1 I_
• W 1 '[ CO'
',RECEIVED 4 � J� I lL( I .
} Ii
CITY OF RENTON Z1 — I I1l1
HEARING EXAMINER 1 r I 4
J UN 1 31978 a I Li I
AM PMd ti °
7i81911001f12111213e4t i6
, A . , i I .1,i S u wi
a
*
T/IAFP'C Covivrs - As vF 2- 22- 78
T/CAFEt C Cov,Ts Ana< PIPELINE ROAD CLosv g. !-z5 e77
EXHIBIT NO. . . ..
ITEM NO -ZE 7L
I►0.LING HILLS AVE
REcErvED EXHIBIT NG . . \\ ;111011r.._
e1 .OF RENTON
M A�Vf�1� EXAMINER ITEM N i /"'-' 7 .\ aj ' Nr1Zj
tro . C
AM d'u 131978 ' 1 'I
' ,911011111Z11.2131,
IIROILING Hlll3l
\ \ J
•
. •
(c...N.r. . . L
1
\/> \
• .
' ROLLING
N
.inxFC AVE 5 ,. 1 \ v
•
_.: ._ r__." • N
. \ ..."141): 1--------'
HIGH AVE S J ?k I •. '`\
S 1,
f ..--."*......d. [..
bz
=P.
GRANT AVE ! '" r ` . . ''� r �`tceY•
GA�Ni AVE
w I 1 ! (�
i , 44.1"141be
:ler
w1.I : .., . ;•.„,
�A\f
344
RENTON AVE s !„ • 1 • \• ` 2 5 Y ' , .�
4,1%
%
3 58 AC . ilk 1k.... 0 ,
, IF i • /V /
• • 0c)
/... _... ----........ 324 ACr. ....„ If • '`-•.: • ..: :! i'';',
9 , `
' 1\+ • �., ` �4 25 X 1 �O Pe I ` )t,-
ZEDAq AVE 5 ,�Q` eo ':za� 4��� ` , `
Zoo I •( ti
��� , ''
too AC �. lis ^ / ; 25w \
EpGILOP°i Vr
al _ :3.111 AC z»nc . -�4
A.
W • 1 ,di �' Ww +` 2TwC.......7............../3
�1 .�
INTERSTATE 103 1P ' ``--�-- `y i' \- 11 /'
14-
W THUPIOERHILL PL.�i. Z
\iRENTN ELKS/j: I SITE ,.o • 15c SQL !..
I in
32• 1
m I.t AGE riE
MEMORANDUM
•
DATE: April 21, .1976
TO: Del Bennett
FROM: Bob Hammond
•
•
SUBJECT: Cedar Avenue South -- Parking Survey
The results of the parking survey are as follows: - .
21 Residents desire parking on both sides
21 Residents desire parking restricted on the east side
4 Residents failed to mail back their questionnaire
1 Vacant resident
Exactly 50% (or 23) of the residents were contacted personally.
A list is attached showing address, how contacted, and name and
parking preference. •
My recommendation would be to allow parking on both sides in view
of the original intent of the improvement; however, this should be
a Council decision.
•
•
RAH:ad RECEIVED
Attachment CITY OF RENTON
• HEARING EXAMINER
•'UN 1 31978
AM • PM
718191101111121 1 121314t5i
•
EXHIBIT NO. /2-
ITEM. NO.- /7r- 7(.
-17- /f
, TRAFFIC STUDY
/: By
JOSEPH J. MILLEGAN & ASSOCIATES, li4C.
,4 .THE PROJECT SITE
The proposed Cedar Crest Condominium site is located east of I-405 in
Renton, Washington. As shown on the Vicinity Map on page 7, the pro-
ject site is bounded by I-405 on the west, Cedar Avenue South on the
east, South 7th Street on the north and a 300-foot Power Line easen.ent
buffer on the south. The property farther south is zoned R-4 , Multi-
family residential.
Photographs 1 through 3 illustrate the existing site condition, see
page 9 . It is a steep hillside with over 60-foot drop to proposed con-
dominiums from the adjacent road, Cedar Avenue South.
At the northern end of the project site, two 4-plex• condominiums are built .
See Photographs 4 and 5. The existing poorly maintained housing t: the
. north of, this property is shown in Photograph 6 . Mill Avenue Sout= ::rich
runs parallel to and West of Cedar Avenue South is shown in Photocrs.:h 7 .
The existing development on Mill Avenue is illustrated in Photogra;h 3 .
The Photograph 9 shows a panoramic view of the hillside. The Mill Avenue
apartments and the 4-plex condominium on Cedar Avenue can be identified
in this picture. .
THE ACCESS
Cedar, Avenue South which runs North-South is a 27-foot wide street with
a gentle 4% slope down the north. It has six and a half feet wide side-
. walks on both sides . See Photographs 10 and 11. The project site is
located to the West of Cedar Avenue and South of its intersection with
South 7th Street. Cedar Avenue South ends at South 9th Street, see
Photograph 12.
THE TRAFFIC .
Two-way traffic and parking on both sides of Cedar Avenue South are cer-
mitted. The roadway with its relatively new and good surface condition
will carry approximately 1000 to 1200 average weekday traffic volun.e . The
peak-hour traffic volume is approximately 10% of the+ average daily traffic
(ADT) volume. The morning peak hour will occur from about 7:00 a.n. to
8:00 a.m. and the evening peak hour will occur from about 4: 30 p .m. to
5: 30 p.m. .
On November - 1 , 1977, the staff of Joseph J. Millegan & Asso'ciates , Inc . ,
observed and recorded the traffic count north of Cedar Avenue intersection
at South 5th Street. The measured evening, peak-hour volume between 4 : 30
p.m. to 5 : 30 p.m. was 49 . On November -12;b 1977, the morning peak-hour
traffic volume was measured between 7: 30 a.m. to 8: 30 a.m. It was 27
vehicles.
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON 9
HEARING EXAMINER EXHIBIT NO. / , ...
AM •
JUN .
31978 PM ITEM NO - /7 - 7
70i19 11hl2IlI2•3,415,6 -1- .ram V
L'
These findings are confirmed by the Traffic Department for the City of
Renton which took a traffic count on June 23, 1977 at the same location,
see page 15 . The peak-hour volume was 25 between 7 : 30 a.m. to 8: 30
a.m. and 46 between 4 : 30 p.m. to 5: 30 p.m. The 24-hour volume was 572 .
The City has also taken a count on June 21, 1977 North of South 4th Street
intersection at Cedar Avenue South. The peak-hour volume was 28 between
7: 00 a.m. to 8 :00 a.m. and 66 between 4 : 30 p.m. to 5 : 30 p.m. The 24-
hour. traffic volume was 691 . See page 16 .
The Measured ADT is approximately 50% of the estimated average weekday
traffic capacity for Cedar Avenue South. The measured morning peak-hour
traffic volume is very low and afternoon volume is about 50% of estimated
capacity.
It is estimated that the proposed project when fully occupied will gen-
erate not more than 450 trips . This estimate is based upon recommendation
of Trip Generation Institute of Transportation Engineers .
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
•
•
The proposed development is a 90 unit 4-plex clustered condominium con-
struction.
The estimated vehicular trips per average weekday for a 90-unit complex on
the subject site is 450 . With present ADT of about 600 , the additional
trips generated when the condominiums are built and occupied will not
exceed the present design capacity of the roadway. The estimated peak-
hour traffic will reach about 100 .
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The present traffic condition of Cedar Avenue South appears to be about
50% of its optimum design capacity. The additional traffic volume generate
by the proposed condominium complex will utilize this excess capacity.
However, the following recommendations are made which, if opted, will im-
prove the existing traffic circulation on Cedar Avenue South . '
Plan 1: Restrict parking on east side of the roadway during peak hours of
traffic. See page 17 , for results of City - conducted poll which
shows that 50% of people responding to poll elected to restrict
parking on east side of Cedar Street.
Plan 2: No" parking on both sides of Cedar Avenue South between S . 3rd
Street and S. 4th Street and no parking on east side south of
S. 4th Street.
Plan 3: Traffic circulation to make Cedar Avenue South -one-wav southbound
and Renton Avenue South one-way northbound between S . 7th Street
and S. 3rd Street, see page 18 .
Plan 4 : No left turn at S . 7th Street intersection with Cedar Avenue South
for the eastbound traffic from Cedar Crest Condominium complex,
see page 19 .
Plan 5 : Remove sidewalk along east side. of Cedar Avenue South, thus widenin<
the road width to 33 '-6" between S. 7th Street and S . 3rd Street .
-2-
r -
REFERENCES
1 . Highway Capacity Manual 1965
Highway Research Board, Speci-al Report 87
National Academy of Sciences
National Research Council
2. Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation - An Informational Report,
Arlington, Virginia
3. Renton Civic Center Area Traffic Circulation Study,
Renton, Washington by Transportation Planning
and Engineering, Inc. , March, 1970.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The traffic count included in Appendix I and the Drawings 1 through 4 are
provided by the Traffic Engineering Department, City of Renton.
The Renton Civic Center Area Traffic Circulation Study is provided by
Victor H. Bishop, P.E. , President of Transportation Planning and Engineering,
Inc.
We express our gratitude to the Engineering Staff for the City of Renton and
Mr. Victor Bishop for their help and cooperation.
Joseph J. Millegan, P.E.
University of Montana - Major: Chemistry 1940-1942
University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1942-1945
University of Washington - Graduate School ,
Structures 1965-1966
Professional Organizations
American Society of Civil Engineers
Consulting Engineers Council
Registered Professional Engineer:
Civil 1952 Washington
Structural 1957 Washington
Civil 1963 Alaska
Civil 1963 Oregon
Professional 1971 Montana
Experience:
CAA Sea-Tac Airport, Surveying 1943
The Boeing Airplane Co. , Tooling Inspector 1944
Douglas Aircraft Co. , Structural Test Engineer 1945-1949
The Boeing Airplane Co. , Structural Test Engineer 1946
General Petroleum Co. , Civil Engineer
Bulk Tank Farms, Service Facilities, Warehouses 1945-1949
Harry R. Powell , Structural Engineer
Building and Bridge Structural Design 1949-1950
George W. Stoddard, Architect, Structural Engr. 1950
Seattle City Light, Civil Engineer 1950-1951
Bouillon, Griffith & Christofferson
Consulting Engrs. , Civil. and Utilities Engineer 1951-1960
Private Practice as Consulting Engineer, Civil
and Structural Engineering 1960-present
Recent Related Projects:
1977 Partner in Charge of Engineering Survey and Report on
Northern State Hospital
1977 Partner in Charge of Space Allocation and Capital Improve-
ment Plan - Northern State Multi-Service Facility
1977 Partner in Charge of Missile Magazine, OICC Trident,
Indian Island Annex
1974 Partner in charge of Engineering Studies in support of Master
Planning, USN Indian Island Annex
1972 - 1974 Partner in charge of investigation, evaluation, design
for modifications of all utility systems, Discovery Park
(Fort Lawton) Seattle, Washington
1973 Partner in charge of design for all site work and utility
systems, College of the Bible, Bothell , Washington
Joseph J. Millegan, P.E.
•
University of Montana - Major: Chemistry 1940-1942
University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1942-1945
University of Washington - Graduate School ,
Structures 1965-1966
Professional Organizations
American Society of Civil Engineers
Consulting Engineers Council
Registered Professional Engineer:
Civil 1952 Washington
Structural 1957 Washington
Civil 1963 Alaska
Civil 1963 Oregon
Professional 1971 Montana
Experience:
CAA Sea-Tac Airport, Surveying 1943
The Boeing Airplane Co. , Tooling Inspector 1944
Douglas Aircraft Co. , Structural Test Engineer 1945-1949
The Boeing Airplane Co. , Structural Test Engineer 1946
General Petroleum Co. , Civil Engineer
Bulk Tank Farms, Service Facilities, Warehouses 1945-1949
Harry R. Powell , Structural Engineer
Building and Bridge Structural Design 1949-1950
George W. Stoddard, Architect, Structural Engr. 1950
Seattle City Light, Civil Engineer 1950-1951
Bouillon, Griffith & Christofferson
Consulting Engrs. , Civil and Utilities Engineer 1951-1960
Private Practice as Consulting Engineer, Civil
and Structural Engineering 1960-present
Recent Related Projects:
1977 Partner in Charge of Engineering Survey and Report on
Northern State Hospital
1977 Partner in Charge of Space Allocation and Capital Improve-
ment Plan - Northern State Multi-Service Facility
1977 Partner in Charge of Missile Magazine, OICC Trident,
Indian Island Annex
1974 Partner in charge of Engineering Studies in support of Master
Planning, USN Indian Island Annex
1972 - 1974 Partner in charge of investigation, evaluation, design
for modifications of all utility systems, Discovery Park
(Fort Lawton) Seattle, Washington
1973 Partner in charge of design for all site work and utility
systems, College of the Bible, Bothell , Washington
Robert I . Anderson, P.E.
University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1969
Professional Organizations
American Society of Civil Engineers
• American Congress on Surveying & Mapping
Registration
Civil 1972 Washington
Land Surveying 1975 Washington
Experience:
The Boeing Company 1958-1964
Washington State Department of Highways 1964-1966
Leonard I . Schroeter, Land Surveyor 1966-1969
Horton Dennis t Associates, Civil Engineer 1969-1973
Principal , Joseph J. Millegan & Associates, Inc. 1974-present
Recent Related Projects:
1975 Project Engineer for Traffic and Parking recommendations,
Master Plan Update for Keyport Naval Complex,
Department of the Navy
1976 Project Engineer for Traffic and Parking investigations,
Discovery Park, Seattle Parks and Recreation
1977 Utility Analysis - Engineering Survey and Report on
Northern State Hospital
1976 Partner in charge of Survey, Utility Systems, including
Storm Water Retention and Sewage Equipment for
Philadelphia Church 90-acre Planned Unit Development
1974 Project Engineer for Investigation and Evaluation of all
facilities, Indian Island Annex - Department of the Navy
Ahmed M. Jaddi , P.E.
Osmania University, -India - B.S. in Physics 1951-1955
Osmania University, India - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1955-1958
Columbia University - M.S. in Civil Engineering 1959-1961
Urban Planning 1963-1964
Award:
Gold Medal for standing first in the Class of 1958
Professional Organizations
American Concrete Institute
Structural Engineers of Washington
Registered Professional Engineer
Civil 1970 Washington
Structural 1971 Washington
Experience:
Central Water & Power Commission
Government of India 1958-1959
Columbia University Research Assistant 1959-1961
Columbia University Lecturer 1961-1963
Ammann & Whitney, Inc. 1961-1963
Severud, Perone, Sturm, Bendel , Consulting Engrs. 1963-1964
Severud, Perone, Sturm, Bandel , Resident Engineer
St. Louis Gateway Arch 1964-1965
Parsons-Jurden Corporation, Structural Engineer 1965-1967
The Boeing Company 1967-1969
N. G. Jacobson & Associates, Inc. , Structural Engr. 1969-1971
Wick Construction Company, Regional Manager for
Projects in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia 1971-1974
Principal , Joseph J. Millegan & Associates, Inc. 1974-present
Related Experience:
1969 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility Design
City of Everett, WA
1970 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility Design
City of Bremerton, WA
1971 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility
General Administration
State of Washington, Olympia, WA
1974 Traffic Study and Parking Design
Pacific National Bank Branch
Madison Avenue, Seattle, WA
•
lir '4*9 ve.
LIBERTY
- \ PARK
i . h
G • • I
• j Zi
�FR
• S. 2ND ST. v4 CITY
[Ai
• uZ uj HALL
"
tai Q
Q W •,..
/
.._
.•/._.•,.'
/ .
•
• > _
J i r11
NC5
•
S. 3RD ST. •
•
ui
I I Vf
z
S. 4TH ST. j ce Q • O
a z
W W
U c
•
•
0 3
•
•
�v
•
• i
• .. / N / i
1 S•7 TF+ St
/ j
6----1
J EGT
NI Ver LIBERTY • —'
-r N
PARR
Or
. .
X..
/. .
, .
• S. 2ND ST. J4 . CITY
uj HALL
' • VS
# . .
W VS
.••
> u.I
3 / 4,
. • ,J) < "i" AP-
. z
-J • . c2CL • •
11.1 •-;i
1 • 1
S. 3RD ST. •
I ,
i • li • vs V;
>
' < <
• S. 4TH ST. 1 4C • OZ
1--
0 Z
U CC
71 I 1 .—.
f
• •
•
! ..
No LaFT TURN
- i 1 . S./V+ ST.
•
• II!
/ 11
. . ,
•
1 egoJecT PLAN 4 _
. .
_
rIT a ._
•
v f-+. \ I-. - / • • ✓ - . • / '
r7
oasEe_vEevee: 4i - 0 J m 4
1:::% ., ..,• 0 0
•
u' 1
a -
S. ST" ST.
of
-d . RECEIVED
Q CITY OF -RENTON
11' HEARING EXAMINER
J UN 2 01978
AM PM
71E0110111112a 121341516
-TiNAe- PE a loft
-ru iLtJ Wet / i O 5
f�,�vE Li.EIaT 3I�. �.0 ���
rn-i - 5 H- c t(1 It 7 t tt" -
z i I
-
3 , )
4
5 tittltl a Itt1 . 6 ittflit 8 •W 3 -1-f s-
G 1 . f _ jII 3 vl I , - I _
16 10 10 0 ,, ,
c.ik, ) 4-32 c
VAl1= • > ,' ' " )" )
oase_V EeVEe. : •
•
•
•
•
•
1pN, •
S.
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
JUN 2 01978
AM PM
7,8191101111121112r3141516
TIME- pE11Zlo0
-ru(Lk)t LICA 4 ¢s _ I F _.
fa.oV E F,.�EtaT ao AA, 15 �� 1 30 � 4s' �5�., ' �5 8�
z
3
4
s ► ►ti 1 11 r/
• 4 IF 1 1
% 6 7
RECEIVED
RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE CITY OF RENTON
SUITE 206 HEARING EXAMINER
16625 REDMOND WAY JUN,13 1978
REDMOND, WA 98052 AM PM
(2o6) 883-88 t 4 7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6
June 12, 1978 11
Mr. James Irwin
Shidler, McBrorm, Gates and Baldwin EXHIBIT NO. ,2-Q
1000 Norton Building PJ1� 11 l�f
Seattle, Washington 98104
ITEM NO. 1- !7F 2f
Dear Mr. Irwin:
This letter is written to update information presented in October and November
of 1977 on the 11.25 acres of land owned by Transamerica Development Corp. and
located in the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 20, Town-
ship 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian.
The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate value differences in this particu-
lar tract of land under alternative zoning designations - specifically multi-
family residential as compared with single family residential - imposed by the
City of Renton.
The subject .has the use of a transmission line easement in favor of Puget
Sound Power and Light Co. Some 2.347 acres are thus restricted. A use permit
provides for certain non-structural uses for this area.
A search of multi-family residential lands revealed many sales of such land.
Four sales were selected since they show similarities to the subject property.
Sale Buyer Date Acreage Zoning Total Price Unit Price
A CHG International 8-10-77 6.6 ac. RM-1800 $170,862 $25,888
King Co.
B Fairway Assoc. 9-26-77 20.0 ac. RM-2400 $248,000 $17,400
King Co.
C Lakeview Tower Assoc. 10-28-77 2.1 ac. R-4 $106,000 $50,476
Renton
D Southridge Assoc. 8-29-77 2.9 ac. RM-1800 $125,000 $43,103
King Co.
Sale A to CHG International is located in the 15000 block of SE 176th Street,
a very busy street. It is of gently rolling topography and lacking view. Zon-
ing by King County is for moderate density development.
?/v
•
OF R
41 " 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
i Der' � .• BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540
0
O �' kt% co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o��T�O SEPT� OP� May 24, 1978
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI
MAYOR
TO: Gary Kruger, Planning Department
FROM:' Building Division '
SUBJECT: Renton Hill Building Permit Data
Per your request of May 23rd, following is the information
we have on file:
1976 - 1 New Private Garage
1 New Single Family Residence '7
1 New 2nd Story on Single Family Residence'
1 New Addition to Single Family Residence✓
1977 ;1 New Private Garage and Lowered Basement"/
2 New Single Family Residences
•
1 New 8-Plex
1978 2 New Single Family Residences ✓
RECEIVED
• '!; CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
IN131978
AM PM
7. $$,9,10e11e12e1e2r3e4,e5e6
RGN/mp
• PpririFkn•
MAY 24 1978
EXHIBIT
ITEM NO. i- 71F- 7_ • •
Sale B to Fairway Associates is located at the 17600 block of 140th SE in
King County.. It is a larger parcel than subject and carries a less dense
zoning designation, both inferior features compared with subject. It is on
a major street, and adjoins a power substation and has a power line easement.
This tract is gently rolling, compared with steep topography of subject.
Sale C to Lakeview Tower Associates is in the 8800 block of So. 131st Street in
Renton and zoned for R-4 multi-family development. The neighborhood is highly
developed, with major shopping nearby.
Sale D to Southridge Associates is at the northwest corner of So. 188th and
Military Road in King County. Zoning is RM-1800. This property represents
multi-family development in an area of freeway activity, enjoying a good view
and not incurring excessive building or site preparation costs.
Subject property was purchased in November of 1965 under a R-3 zoning desig-
nation for $171,492, or a unit value of $15,246 per acre. It was a component
of a package of properties bought by the company.
Sales C and D demonstrate utilization of multi-family land as a buffer be-
tween single family properties and more heavily developed property or the
noise of the freeway. Considering the physical features of the subject, in-
cluding topography, size, location and position relative to the freeway,
these sales show the subject to be bracketed in value at between $18,000
and $30,000 per acre if zoned and utilized for multi-family uses. In the
opinion of the appraiser, a value estimate of $25,000 per acre is prudent.
An alternative zoning designation would limit the subject to single family
development. This tract is not physically suited to single family residential
development due to its topographic features and proximity to Interstate 405.
It may be mentioned that single family neighborhoods are more successful if
a transitional zone separates homes from commercial areas ,or freeways.
However, research disclosed certain properties sold recently with single family.
zoning designations. These are located in the neighborhood. Of the known
sales, the following are all considered superior to the subject for single
family utilization.
Sale Buyer Date Acreage Zoning Total Price Unit Value
1 Bates 1-05-78 5.0 ac. SR $ 30,000 $6,000
King Co.
2 Parkwood 5-31-77 15.8 ac. S-R-1 $108,446 $6,800
Renton
3 Hansell Co. 11-10-77 36.0 ac. R-S-15000 $147,500 $4,100
King Co.
4 Abrejara 7-13-77 5.0 ac. GS-1 $ 20,000 $4,000
Renton
Sale 1 - this recent sale is located in the 800 block of SE 31st Court, ad-
jacent to single family dwellings. It slopes down to the west and is a small
tract.
Sale 2 to Parkwood Homes is a single family residential property within the
incorporated limits of Renton. It is superior to subject in that it is of
more gentle topography and in a new single family residential area. It is
desirable for single family homes.
Sale 3 to Hansell Co. is located in an area of newly developing single family
homes. Topography is sloping and suited to economical development. In these
features it is superior to subject. Zoning requires approximately 1/3 acre per
building lot.
Sale 4 to Abrejara of five acres in Renton is zoned for GS-1 by that munici-
pality. It adjoins a community business district and enjoys a territorial
view.
Sales for single family residential development on steep lands adjacent to
the freeway were not found by the appraiser's search for sales of properties
with physical features similar to subject. The fact that they did not emerge
demonstrates a lack of use in such properties for development - or alternatively
that they do not exist in abundance by reason of the utilization of multi-family
zoning to protect the single family neighborhood from the intrusions of
noise and fumes.
The sales cited above demonstrate single family values of from $4,000 per
acre to $6,800 per acre. As mentioned, these are superior to subject for
single family utility. The subject then would be valued at the lower level
of $4,000 per acre as land zoned for single family uses.
•
To restate the purpose of this letter is to detail value differences of this
11.25 acre parcel under varying zoning designations. The following recapit-
ulates:
11.25 acres @ $25,000/ac. (multi-family) = $281,250
11.25 acres @ $ 4,000/ac. (single family) = $ 45,000
DIFFERENCE $236,250
Respectfully submitted,
RANEY APPRAISAL INC.
Frank R. Raney
FRR:klc •
SUBJECT PROPERTY
R. Ul 1 11
7TH ST.
•
I
. rl iiii
N
y (,,,,
-�.1�" 11 .
A / a_
~ 01J = n I
fd <
in
in LA
u
u
S 9TH ST
' N .i'l
'
i 4 ' N
PuC` i
•
Cipyr4, ... . i
C iA,
II TM ST'IL
i ...., . ...
I
001.C1 OF SE4fit[ ESM
l 5( : ilt 11 I I ilk."-111:..l -
...I1 I 1 " . �'f ` '
, .f.u.r .cs_.....
1 ,
RAN R!W • �" J /
piAB�O SEA LE T f i t /
N P
jj :
~g LA
``Iv
_, d .
..,,L N 5
p
7 h.) . _ op
Il
r )116,X
ik
— Ili1 1 at
` • PUG �W \ Y" \ ----- /....---:
Frank R. Raney,
MAT, ARA. RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE
_I •'~ awd i Dz 1- D u • 11 • 1 Ir _ . �� t�
1 '
IF 11111.1
H MI 3•, .�)n s !i• i _ Ti' 'if Na[1l 31 �" o '4 i ■
Q _ ,' y 'n ^.re 3E, T Z£ I� 9£ ! a ' t �,J, I / �a.n
. _ ' 1 i
•
E.
v
= � - is WI,.35 x I ' 'nu�.n 3e __ - - �-i---- t IS s -- �--f- -f/ - _
- • 4. `i
1S tint 35 • '� - -- - _ -
t'C lm I M16[I 35 a,� - �` S;E; - . $ s S I __ _(-(•� T.
.. - •,r
11^ lc »1GM' 7 15 109.13S Ilb.: Js, 1� 3! W`a4 '� IS r Y r ` 1sd‘ ✓L`S1tll13S te w�,_ Y177si arr■c ,. p��ayi' n� 9D Jt ,u; Lrastl 3s r 1S Nth 'tam .sw j `�. ,:r t u`'a i• 4,
/�yf •O: �f1 35 m T. NY1 35 _ I3 K= ��t S•. a31.� V I l lac� � .,� .,�► J 1f rt`1` ,'
V 'I' I tt 1 nuns S ` • N 1 _ - - .,.J 1._ YI t
z' µJL l3 m . 5 ,`." /. y2 '_is..; >I _ i waYtl\ LL
v 111J 1i1 J >•,`••• d IS, -_ H _ 5 Mle 5,Y5=1AOd.5 d 3S IS au! IS AM �^" e Sis
• � .r 1, i� __ _...r
nee ��!'•"• ` 1r,`•\ 1. 1. - - ? _ ' '3 ,f - - -- -- - ••
//' ,3C.. -�T 1' ,/© 15'
_J ONtt1 3t. f - -\ .1Q15L-� T �'1 = aS I ''at 1f supsi•�r s - • --- /. .5,.. ,F • � •r I V -
.r . d A{' wi�z re Goa 3S i :$ M1S1
J 35 +etl �_ (<". I. � -astir = . Vrit 35 f - 1_- fe _ "�'n� r __ ..
9s 1 . '''J V N1tr,1 '-' ss,ll TS la mi t\ 1f z I as iI as ` I n • S r •,!` .. IS
S J r'�s.-;t4-.+sslrs �' ,,,•• ',�J 1S Hot, At, 3'f S ` i IS.. af,b, f0Naa1 1S ouisi © :• - >\ ,'�i,r� B�BBBf ' _`. • '..:MNal
3S'ld.•p • N .4.s F 6%` dk. € 3.S go a 'W f I O `, f.I _ .i1 .- •V' l O 11 f
'4�6510"1. �S Y _ • ZARA < < til.k �, 15 eel 35 t'T1�11 ` .. .may. _": t 'Y""-;' ,1-'
G <
T■ "'r f 1S �... 1d 1.16 I ~ < " ` e }' - `147 ,�1 ., �
Idy r•a�9l•`• ,. 131K1 Y•rd C: J.`��1�NajalaV cr) < _ - i I �SYa. f t.t > ` �. • 1 N
irt,,,,:
1b sx d 1 •• = - = . sc 3s< nu s - '4" 'Vt �. _t1r1■3•a.n LS.'ll aB91
�5P` qt .10 _ < TS�? gyp{ .- ,s - : _ - Cn m .N 1-`'ua • ( - 15 N;
^e d�` rft .3 s Y ° S t � C1=f, - ' _ �� vS ads �I - -
'Y '< ° fit',.., '.,,Wo. a 1f Nate 'J as• + • t- 1.»arr-3s . .. I. %11 35 v.1■1 s-. ' ` .,r.-.S IR } No
' ° _ 1nf3S, •- 1S N1M1 _ In 'n -i?(s_ n I. as -y • t�. t■s t, j 4■� _ _
Kr1 .1 .s o1r ,.1 s1 :.,: � Naw135 3• • Nlir1 3 $...S 3Si,,. I.
1e 4' S1S'" i`� ts9 r,• \ t t 115 N1
l ~ ., 35 Y;� .1.t aj, - y _ w 1 _ •
Mlr" - is - N,M13f »Mlrl1 of 1YR S LL �UJa - _. - - -- -- - --- --- - 14_
• _- ...awl. +• 1 -
111,� JI
dorlrs< 3s es i�11r ,�: °�+r z = 3 I- _ 3S i]aa3rrll•� aNlRf 1 • jg3ir. .i.,. 1S 1
° •)! m .�: ,35.�d/slncc -,c..`.._,4 . as--} n l5 , Nt91 35 1 Ia „� �.r.■■N �1s�xOS- . - \ t __ i1svn,,��, 'SO1 '1:'ld elm 3S r' J"-•t OM t11 M�> •ISM 3S ` `M^TI7 �(• ■•
�/��--� �. ..:�: .:ice.. .. iSli... . . ..._i .,
_ M"SKI 351." 7. 5 iSlrl 35 I,F t. syslrt 3Tsnainh ••• . -- -- lil i"_ __ lrrl 35 °, <.S».O•I
i• �•:• )- f
ii
- 3% a ,,
uw. ®G -, = - eI - 9 N 01L N 3 . .tI �..
M a
•
1 4
it.).
T L as,Q11 ..... ,
J ../.6 \ \a. 4y. 4.l`. . .tI iS i _ I- ¢ Y7 4-. �l'''...".....---161-
Y' ` \-1)11:,i ,
7br '.� z y'a fia L+}d �. sr"^. '.N.. d ' 4 ='af . ._ _ _ _ a I,s i� t- �711:1,
�
Cam- , s°.a _ \'fi4 _ r " I DS _ R N / \� tror. • . _- -- S �lan,za.d
p'Y ,3� ZZ Z `z��`• I SS w11 ^ r`�' z�. N� QZ �A! I '�,� \,'I ».
'�w ,' I^ d a6� s ' \ !�E �� �C'� ~ �� I r 2 tSriOz1 s 15�i
•VV 4 �.,
.f�
�mpea 7rJ no'J . ` •
i ...... as Nu
C ..1,--a. • !��. null y 37r1M roues s NI•s is., \., � •• id
+ - -e �Y...•l;.N_ �' .. � :Ampof i , 1
e,la� Y. 3fxxnr *,i!
• w ....eta r;15�' .,rr:3- pOOAI) ire..\ ' SIMI \
4e..dhik raj
• , ..q.tr: z +�- y., fi _` ;` ,T sr _` ,s. _ +SR•S - t /)B■R ftn \s.STA% `S s: y.:JYI _1 ,w' ♦ tlM _ F '^/� I ( MY6✓ M4ii.i< +_d[7. 1Lars, •',, +�511.-- 1 . s"". -5 .7 4-. "', � f1. _ -_ 1 .• V T-^l,i IA1' L 1131111P111; �.Y •�1 __
�� \ 1S••Z3 SM
- '.^:51- ..T.7 OI 3s L.�'�f (��i 1 �,` ` 1I.- ,I< J
f xIJ-- _FVh f asp '= I'�,. s 0M IQ
C gAIIIII
b �C-: 1` a 19 liid3 n.�+► 2!3/IRi:� ' � ' Pl `� -
6 ,a ^-1 P dp ` Jcv -rr �/y.`.r� $"M • fi78 : • j<ti "` nN1al-.c1)t, _l: •i.�e".d i, �f O' /5Jr � ��JWs. • ,Q /1L � '��'' �• q�` \ �-. •b•e...6fi• tS` ,
pSS11''''' yS - Si '-(,� 4°.'"<d.4.4 ;< 91 ��� ` J�„ - mimic,.. ,�/� •oa /` _ -J m�°6 ld�\ J1 'J,d�,�t*ter- ` "�r•`-
4:i V1�.tS' .._- h.R .Y 1'. �_..��.. MYrm O��I i .•• . 4• is Nu, s�� VL.,(/ ^d-`. .y$
: 1r� -..,1s - I 7w '-?I''''' s •
• re.: ;mTDSi !z-- rl.3w,w �n?� I s` '� ® ?rx .. � S � Ia - } ,
�^ .:Zt� - '.y _'I .- 'I MI.•r-=�.`r j/ • \ �z a•r•ui.l.n'z. r}ri■ ' �'^'■5 Ia ''r 'u►tI SaS[I e ��3 ��\ �� s+�i'��•',�,t
tixtfl i -. 1_ ?s:� 7 � ,; ei� .411V,' ,, �_ � �4, 1 r w£f' S ' �,�FF?Si ���`
..++rrea7 f,Za� is a¢t1 s �5� • 1�+5
< T TI[.-3{r - r • A _ I;[;��5 lYOdMR rY' . ' rif a I m„ J� N' J : t •.r1
'_ , ' ^ h .'I t �� ©�� ^ \-11rP
- • •S a _Or..mD1S9Nrl. _ __ Js \ •✓'
1 Sz b •Nli'
r�..� .' ro0•wr3a� t+ro.,wsern. Is,f a� gal[ ;I[��L�111Cx//� '= orS ., I / 1 1 a1 r �15m I S ,
.E j - �• ©+ 91/ .ems•eQ. •
LL(( s• 1 l wN::.s �I '� i 15 y
IS NM 3S /". � u. ^rs i,/
S ! - li Nit 3M z - a't dJ• !3' - z I-uW ` l i u'•S aNl - '�.3P•" »a4:. a z a ' �_:ld d6i?. 5
Is 7.. >. ..-, .s -+-- i.mm1,, �� ti - �T F<
14.sN y z ``/'/ /if,n� N �' I 1y7..,lp&.s 1 dz4 c �..1I, S u T.aJs < _
, 1- - f -% Nc..3a �1 <�s - • J/f.• 4-4 _; ■ysl=1� �a �' ,; ,I I Ssr; ,D �i•'�"6ii'' d5 b d 1 Q6 N •iN197'! \'r .r`�
.•i 3! _ �� Js t - /J ; AS A
it S� Y, , •., I<It i,.- id'a S�Jt'//s y5, :SNaa \..
_ -r. -'y _ -.+Tz- c.f1^,�SZs[ 1 - Y 1`4 r 1/ . - '� •1$ Na ti''•4 I� "\ �_� ` at - c �▪ �Tit
x .- i ..-s , 1•if1 3 ie.. :.x.�1- .I •...'L aC6 3i'- • ' 1.. Nu" ,+,\ 111I�.y- s -Id-tI_-- --4--- jA Mz� s S.+,S'�t_. ia.i i[ 7 '•�S b\ •• N.to• I�i i
■ •d_ .0 3.,. 1. d i - { i I 111 •�•`. r-�-J -
•
•
.. i
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
•
TO: Finance Department •
Fire Department. )(
Library Department •
• ® Park Department. •
Police Department'
Public Works Department
Building Div. / Traffic Engineering Div.
Engineering Div.; g Utilities Engineering Div..
FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his
designee)
•
• /`:,,��.�;�. �.,, , / (by - Gary R. Kruger, Senior Planner,
Gorddn Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 295-77 ; Application No. :
Action Name: RENTON HILL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : 12-1-71
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS:
( Department: OzZ�
Comments : Z.0—
.
�a.•4./ /lGtl n _4J yrs ,l.,GQi,1� �cvti'f7ao.c ��
/
Q/C,ELt• C�cc�"��.*.s, lc-e, OLi ��J6o2i/•'yam �� '
•
Signat Director or Authorized Representative Date
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
!JN 131978 PM Department: � Jh erv:
AM - 1
7,819110111112111213,415,E Comments: ��- ;s rccorn�+�„.o(e�f ,.f �ra....T
G'oxnee o-+- t'GT+4.i kf Gt s
e �•�
0..� " -!c n e,fi.t.s D -p /l.c C.e s �p �C. ' . Al:7 �1
• (75?te!...„44,----
/ • Signature of Director oT u.thorized esentative Date
EXHIBIT NO.•
6-76 �� p �p (OVER)
ITEM NO. /7 0
`.ft ' RECEIVED
' - CITY
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ®F RENTON
HEAR!!VG EXAMINER
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM JUN 1 31978
AM
PM
7r8r9rlOr]]rlZr l r2r3r4rSr6
Ai
FUR U F C I C E USE U N L Y We/fr,�,' Ni/ 4 +d��r �rOv .7
Application No ern/�1� e'/z/.r-si. 'e j7 ofd
N
Envirorr �errtal Checklist No. G� � �'_ ' ®` / 7�
PROPOSED, date : FINAL , date : _�,Q.Z-q7
1. ----
0 Declaration of Significance D Declaration of Significance
EIDeclaration of Non-Significance [iToeclaration of Non-Significance
LI.I
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
`, alT st-ate and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environnri!nt .
I', The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely
as you can with
on
• presently available to you. Where explanations ofyouranswersare required ,nror�where
. you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
,fi include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
d' out unnecessary delay.
'1; The following questions apply to your total,i; proposal , riot just to the license for which
you are currently applying or 'the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed ,
l+' even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
.; of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork • in the future'.
�'i NOTE : this is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question doe': not apply , just answer it "no" and continue on to the
nest question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
' BciCKGROUND
! ,
Name of Proponent CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT -
_ __
z.
Address and phone number of I'roponent : --
I 200 Mill Avenue South •
Renton, Washington 98055 ---
3. Date Checklist submitted November 16, 1977
4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Department
5. Name of proposal , if applicable :
Renton Hill Comprehensive Plan Amendment •
�I 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size , general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
The proposal is to amend the Land Use, Circulation and Community
:4 Facilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is
,i!• attached (see Exhibit A) which includes text and a map. The
?I proposal consists of about 600± acres. The Comprehensive Plan
guides future development and is implemented by developmental
ordinances and capital improvements.
1I
-2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal) :
The amendment is bounded on the west by FAI-405, on the north by the
{ Cedar River, on the east by the extension of Edmonds Avenue, and on
the south by the powerline easements. The area is illustrated in
Exhibit A.
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : '
The City Council may adopt the amendment by Spring, 1978.
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
(federal , state and local--including rezones) :
No permits are required.
1
t
1
7 .
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain :
Additional amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are anticipated
in the general area.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
�., your proposal ? If yes , explain:
A few developers/landowners wish to construct apartments.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
An area-wide rezone is expected to be initiated by the City Council .
•
•
II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
(1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
PEE- MAYBE NO
(b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil ? X
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features? X
Yrs- F{ASl F6—
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? X
YES MAYBE NO
•
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site? X
•
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
1
4I Explanation:
YE MAYBE F
•
•
F •
is •
it • ,. -3-
(2) Air. Will the proposal result in :
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
' YES MM Y8E NO
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any- change •ira' climate , eiGhe .aOCalYy or
regionally? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
•
•
(3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
YES MAYBE Fib
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?- X
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water '
body? X
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature , dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YES MAYBE N0--
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals „ or through
interception -of an aquifer- by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria ,
or other substances into the ground waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
(i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies? X
j,' YES MAYBE N
Explanation:
(4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any
species of flora ( including trees , shrubs , grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic plants)? X
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or '
endangered species of flora? X
YES MAYBE NO .
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species? X
YES M YBE N6
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
•
•
•
•
-4-
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)? X
YES FATTE NO
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
YES MAYBE NO
I'
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into; an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna? X
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
• (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? '(
YES MAYBE Ni)
Explanation:
(7) Light and Glare. Will ' the proposal produce new light or
glare? — — X
YES MAY
Ex lanation:
(6) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
preseni or planned land use of an area? X
YES- M•AYBE ip
Ex.Pla.na.tion: It is anticipated that the proposal will be adopted and
subsequently the multi-family zoning will be changed to single family
zoning. This will reduce the intensity of potential -development
_ _
—compared to the present zon"ing.(9) Natural Resources. will the proposal result in-:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
•
YES - MAYBE N O
(b) Depletion of any noi,renewahle natural resource? X
YES MAYBE NO
•
Explanation:
(10) Risk of Ukset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an - -explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
YES MTIYBE NO
Explanation:
•
L (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, — —
density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area? X
YES MRTYBE• 3
Explanation: As indicated in item 8 above, the density of potential
development (dwelling units) will be reduced, which will reduce the
potential number of people which can live in the area.
-Sy i y
.x . _5_
( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
... Explanation:
iv
II
1 , (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in.:
111
. s (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking? X
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
YES MAYBE i1-
11' .
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? X
YES MAYBE NO
•
I. (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
j, YES MAYBE NO
1.1 (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians? ;(
i, YE M YBE NO
'I Explanation: The proposed amendment to the Circulation Element would
'� not change the existing circulation system and would eliminate the
,1 proposed extension of streets into the planning area.
Id. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
1-
f' (a) Fire protection? X
YES MAYBE NC
(b) Police protection? X
�'1` YES MAYBE NO—
j _ •
(c) Schools? - X •
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
YES MAYBE NO
,+I (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X
1: YES MAYBE NO
! - (f) Other governmental services? X
YES MAYBE NO
;.. Ex lanation: The proposal recommends that a parcel be amended from low
ensi y multiamil to recreation, which will provide opportunities ,
for the expansion of the Cedar River Trail System. Also, the expansion
H of Phillip Arnold Park is recommended. Any expansion of the park system
will cause increased—maintenance costs. -
II ( 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
j0;; YES MAYBE NO
, (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy? X
;ii YES MAYBE NO
'r. Explanation:
L,I .
' Ii.
�' ( 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
1[111 systems, or alterations to the following utilities :
1-i-
(a) Power or natural gas? X
YES MAYBE NO
H
(b) Communications systems? X
;I, YES MAYBE NO
1; . (c) Water? X
' ! YES MAYBE NO
j ,
I
'1, _�.
. -6-
•
1.• (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Storm water drainage? X
'
i.
Y E S MA NO-
I
(f) Solid waste.and disposal? X
YES MAYBE NO
' Explanation: • •
•
I.
'.I
(17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
f+ mental health)? K
Yls- MAYBE NZ—
Ex lanation: A reduction in potential density infers that should all or
agorl ion of Renton Hill collapse due to the exists cal mines, er u be a reduction in human and property loss and/or damageIi compare
1.
h .
to the densities permitted by the existing Land Use Element.
- (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to .the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
., site open to public view? X
ij YES MAYBE NO
j : Explanation: The reduction of intensity of development provided by the
Land Use Element will preserve and enhance views by,the reduction in
i intensity of zoning. . Less intensive zoning will decrease height limits,
, :
increase setbacks, and reduce the_bulk of potential buildings.
(19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
!= quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X
.
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: The proposal includes a recommendation to expand a park and
f:i increase the amount of land designated recreation. If the proposal is
.,1. adopted, this will increase recreational opportunities.
(20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a sign cant archeological or historical
site. structure, object or building? X
YES MAYBE NO-
Explanation: The proposal would encourage the preservation of the
existing single family buildings, some of which may have historical
significance, since it is an older part of the city.
j' III. SIGNATURE
I +
'' I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
i.
IL is true and complete. It is 'understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
I ' there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lacklof f I disclosure o pert.
•
• /J
Proponent: „Al , L_ed
cordon Y. E ksen, Planning Director
(name prin .d} — —' — —
i ,
' City of Renton
1 Planning Department
•
5-76
•
r/:/.\\
'
h '
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO : Finance Department
Fire Department. Y
Library Department
0 Park Department. •
Police Department
Public Works Department
Building Div . ✓ Traffic Engineering Div .
Engineering Div ., Utilities Engineering Div .-
FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his
designee )
,<< . , /\ . . ;.„;.,,,1 1/4 (by - Gary R . Kruger , Senior Planner)
Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director
SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 295-77 ; Application No . :
Action Name : RENTON HILL COME EHENSIVE PLAN
Please review the attached . Review requested by. ( date ) :
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
•
Department :
Comments : /
n L bin God°
s r2 en--� emu;//
anti w, tny-� a���;, .
cfru t, � f ,�� is e� ozi :Jo:51-i .v e �y,, et. •
Signat 76 Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : En
q Jh Pry ,
•
J Comments : �//� ; s recom. 42., ed 7 T
Con nt �o-�- 7?� -PPt G v i vL (�
`c-c�u.e k e s ��•ti
S o - ac ce ss -�a 7��e , e' / 4017/
Signature of Director or uthorized e esentative Date
6- 76
(OVER)
.
•
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
--
C o m m e n t s : -11-re. -e--J--...1 r :z.l.-{ t
-rYt-c-c.-e A p.t•..;tt(e' .<.r.iL 11 ..c�rc-- .l .i t✓,,�.,..'L
.€-" )."
I, f/
ii4",[77
Signature f Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : \-7---L,2 `�)sz
• Comments : A.4.,
Strule0-9-x.%
9,4
e-V-Eti. .
"---1�
Signature of Director o uthorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : PARKS & RECREATION
Comments : The City should look into the possibility of acquiring
property to the south east of Phillip Arnold Park which should be left in a
natural state and act as a buffer zone between the existing park and the power
transmission lines and right-of-way.
\ I
12/1/77_
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
1
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON °I
HEARING EXAMINER Ex D!t
rON 1 31978 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
AM PM
7,8,9t1f,11912i.102t3.4,5c6 OCTOBER 12 , 1977
TO : Planning Commission Members HI IT NO. 02-
FROM: Clark Teegarden , Chairman ITEM NO. I— /7g1- 7d
Comprehensive Planning Committee
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL AREA
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING
INTRODUCTION :
By action of the Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting
on the above subject matter, the Comprehensive Planning Committee
was requested to study th.e area in question and report back to the
Commission on October 12 , 1977 . The attached public hearing notice
(public hearing , September 14 , 1977 ) describes the _area to be con-
sidered and is generally defined as the Renton Hill Comprehensive
Planning Area . ( Refer to Public Hearing Notice. )
For the purposes of the Committee ' s deliberations , the Comprehensive
Plan is defined as the offical statement of the City of Renton
establishing major policies concerning desirable future development .
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - DEFINITION AND PURPOSE :
The Comprehensive Plan consists of the Goals , Objectives , and Poli-
cies ; Land Use. Element ; Circulation Element; Community Facilities
Element ; and Definitions . Proposed developments should be reviewed
• against the Comprehensive Plan to insure that growth is consistent
with the Plan.
The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are :
I To improve the physical and social environment of the
city as a setting for human activities - to make it more
functional , beautiful , decent , healthful , interesting ,
and efficient;
•
PUBLIC N ••; TIC
PUBLIC HEARING
•
CITY. OF RENTON
.PLANNING COMMISSION
i •
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON
•
• SEPTEMBER 14 1977, AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
DESCRIBED BELOW:
PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE VPLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
,
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA
IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE
N EAST, AND THE POWERL I NE RIGHT—OF—WAY ON •THE SOUTH.
. i i Ik11,-,,". Nig t il it qi., , ,F7 4:11 ,-;',"4„,-.=--- "'',, .
�V., , . _ ,,16_ . `fit . � � . -i , �,.T? - . S\
•
� / '
- ti, ,,: ,.. .. 0 ,4 . . — :7• 1 Zs'',. „ \
FT-V5:'11C,,,''P. I ' ...T 1.1-1_.:__ :;,.; k ,., 44
�j ]r y j t 7�' l j its• jy. {•s . �.
ii
R i r4' I• t :\
\
. -� Q 4 I • J•� 1�-
.-: - ' .4-.:: i.j./ ,.,Y.; it. .--i -- 1. .- -f—j I..--?, - . .......k.,
, Y''-/ u."i ', L"'"../ — " ^1. ik,-. .
' / /,yi---.
I : /./ / ‘.,:1',, '•' . 1— --12'.-11 - 1 ..:.ei. ...117....1)::;9'eiji4:11!(:"1 .
aveli..4
. .4. _11
t.'I
.... ......._,. _____
.... .
__,..... ..
_____ - - •
... .•
. .... .
_ ..„
. _. • __ .. .„....,....:,
00! --- :.
.;
It-
0- 0 ?---
- .._i
r =- .� r 'L 1 j .
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT. .
COMMENTS IN WRITING.
•
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT:
CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S.
. PENTnN. _WA. cm;
ter.•a .... .
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Two
• To promote the public interest , the interest of the city
at large as well as the interests of individuals , or
special groups ;
• To facilitate the democratic determination and implementa-
tion of city policies on development ;
6 To effect political and technical coordination in
development ;
O To inject long-range considerations into the determination
of short- range actions ; and
® To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on
the making of political decisions on the development of the
city.
The Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as a guide to help resolve
some of the development problems confronting municipal officials and
the people they represent. The Plan takes into account existing con-
ditions and future needs , and attempts to express the best reasonable
consensus that can be achieved at a given time as to the character
and direction of future growth .
The Plan is of necessity general in its proposals . It must
be flexible ,
since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect
the community . The Plan is not a zoning ordinance , although it makes
significant recommendations for future land use. The Plan is not pre-
cise. It does not represent engineering accuracy,
nor does it claim
to predict exactly the future use of every parcel of property, or
insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Three
In order for the Plan to maintain effectiveness , it should be reviewed
periodically. Conditions might change and unforeseen events may occur
which might necessitate a re-evaluation.
BACKGROUND:
•
As background to the study of the area in question , the Committe
e con-
ducted a field trip of the area involved and studied in detail the
existing land use , the characteristics of the existing development , and
the physical features of the land , including topography and drainage .
During the course of: the work sessions by the committee , representatives
from property owners in the Hill area were present and.. provided input
in the matters discussed . The matter of access was considered in some
detail in terms of the existing street rights-of-way, traffic circulation
existing street conditions , the parking and access problems to individual '
properties , as well as the matter of general traffic circulation .
The study area for comprehensive planning purposes overlapped into
adjacent areas ; and , therefore , the study of the committee encompasses
areas beyond the immediate boundaries of the Renton Hill area , particu-
larly as it relates to traffic circulation , potential development,
need for community facilities , and general area-wide impact of future
development.
The consideration of the committee was basically restricted to
con-
sideration of the Comprehensive Plan elements : land use , circulation ,
and community facilities . In regard to said elements , the natural
characterictics of the area were also considered.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Four
LAND USE ELEMENT:
FINDINGS :
1 . The Renton Hill area is primarily a single family residential
neighborhood with some limited apartment and duplex use inter-
mixed. The extent of multi -family residential development is
limited at this time and is primarily concentrated along Mill
Avenue South. and located westerly of Cedar.
2. Physical characteristics of the area indicate that, while an older
area of the community, the area is basically sound in -terms of
both building and general physical potential- for upgrading . This
potential is presently being recognized by many property owners
in the area , and the area is considered a desirable single family
residential neighborhood .
3. While the area has been in a state of transition , with increas
ed
land values , the physical amenities of the Hill area , such as view,
makes the area highly desirable for residential development .
4 . The existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for Renton
Hill is primarily single family residential with low and medium
density multi -family residential designations between Mill Avenue
South and Cedar Avenue South and extending southerly to and includ-
ing a larger tract of medium density multi -family residential
located at the southwesterly edge of the Hill area . The hillside
areas to the north are presently designated as greenbelt , with
the existing industrial development adjacent to the railroad
right-of-way and a low density multi -family designation to the
Compreh-ens.lve Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Five
north adjacent to the Cedar River.
5. The area includes several large tracts of undeveloped areas ,
which represent both potential single family and multi -family
residential development. Development in accordance with the
present plan would result in increased land use densities .
6. The Committee also reviewed the geological conditions of the
Hill area, including consideration regarding mines previously
located in the area. It was initially recognized that the Hill
has large underlying coal beds , some of these beds having been
mined-out . Said coal beds represent not only a future energy
resource potential but also a hazard to any surface development
in terms of possible mine subsidance . The extent of such
development hazard is unknown and will vary with location . It
is recognized , however, such hazards must be considered in
terms of existing and future development.
CIRCULATION:
1 . The Committee initially recognizes that the present circulation
to Renton Hill is restricted to one access point (at Third and
Mill ) , which essentially creates a large cul -de-sac-type situation .
2. The present 40 foot street rights-of-way restrict access and
limit parking , particularly in that area north of South 7th
Street . The existing topography precludes any substantial
improvement of existing rights-of-way to allow improved access
and parking .
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Six
3 . The parking for the residential uses is primarily on-street
rather than off-street ; and it is recognized that topography
limitations preclude , in many cases , development of acceptable
off-street parking spaces .
4. Increased traffic has occurred as the result of the extensive
use of Phillip Arnold Park located at the top of the Hill .
This impact is particularly noticeable on Renton Avenue . On-street
parking has also impacted the adjacent residential neighborhood .
5 . The existing Arterial Street Plan indicates the extension of
Mill Avenue extending in a southeast direction.,- connecting to a
secondary arterial serving the Tiffany Park area . The present
Plan also projects the extension of Grant Avenue South from South
11th to Puget Drive.
6. The extension of Mill Avenue South with the connection as proposed
does not appear to be physically feasible due to the existing devel -
opment that has occurred and the steep topography.
7. New development of any type would , in the opinion of the committee ,
further impact the existing circulation system unless alternative
means of access were provided to serve the area. The Committee
further recognizes , however, that providing additional access
could further compound the existing problem and make the situation
more critical .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . The existing park has been utilized as a facility serving beyond
the immediate neighborhood. The basic result has been an increase
• a�a— s .z�.__.-�. a L
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Seven
in traffic circulation problems beyond those created by the
immediate residents of the Hill area.
2 . The existing park facility, however, is fully developed and is
used intensively by the community at large. The Renton School Distria
presently
has a 10 acre elementary school site located easterly
of said
park. A school development at this site is not contem-
plated at this time or in the near future, due to the limited
elementary population that might potentially attend said school .
NATURAL SYSTEMS :
1 . The Hill area , due to its nature , has large undevelop
ed hillside
areas with steep slopes , providing a natural greenbelt drainage
system.
2. Disturbance through new development represents a potential hazard
in terms of slides and increased runoff problems ,
RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based on its analysis , the Committee recommends as foll
ows :
LAND D_:
1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill area ,
the Committee recommends that the Hill area north of the Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission right-of-way
designated as single family residential be
residential .
2. The steep hillside areas , powerline rights-of-way , and natural
drainage courses be established as greenbelt areas , in addition
ddition
to those presently designated on the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan .
. _ —
•.z. � s_�i --. �.
, Comprehensive Planning Committee Report •
October 12 , 1977 •
Page Eight •
•
CIRCULATION :
1 . The land use designations as reflected in the existing Compre-
hensive Plan was based upon provision of additional access to the
Renton Hill area to the south and southeast. The extension of
Mill Avenue South is not physically feasible ; and , therefore ,
.it is recommended by the Committee that such designation on the
Arterial Street Plan be deleted.
2 . Extensive input on the part of the residents in the Hill area
indicates the desire to continue the limited access to the Hill
(Third and Mill ) as it is presently constituted. The purpose of
such limitation is to enhance the amenities of the Hill area as
a residential community and preclude through access . It is ,
therefore , further recommended that the proposed Grant Avenue
connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of
access to the Hill .
3. It is recognized that improved access will be necessary to serve
the properties to the south and southeast of the' Renton Hill area
at such time as they are developed. The intent of the Committee ' s
recommendations is that such access be provided from the south .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES : •
1 . Retain the present community facilities - designations for the Renton
Hill area , including the park and school site , recognizing that the
use of the school site for an elementary school may or may not be
feasible in the near future.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Nine
2. The Committee further recommends that the City
possibil -
ity of expansion of Phillip Arnold Park to pursue the the southeast , since it
appears that the potential area would allow reasonable expansion
of said' facility.
3. The area designated low density multi-family residential adjacent
to. the Cedar River north of the railroad be redesignated
9future
recreation .
PROPOSED/FINAL --LLARAT I ON OF S I GN I F I CAt CL, NuN-S I Gf� I F I CANCE
Renton Hill
Application No . Comprehensive Plan Amendment Q PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . EFC-295- 77
0 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for
the Renton Hill area .
Proponent CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Location of Proposal RENTON HILL AREA
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to ® have significant adverse impact upon the environment . not EISav0 he ais
is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 2 maY,e after review by the lead agency of a comp.letedienvvironmentals
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmental significa-nce :
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final )
declaration of non- significance :
•
RECEIVED
EXHIBIT NO.
HEARING EXAMINER
1978 ITEM NO. 22-- /7S 7 S.
'obi r o a e o s
Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen
Title Plannin Dir ctor
Date December 2 , 1977
Signature v'
-
City of Renton
•
t, Planning Department
n
1 -7
• y tXH i i�r4j
EHICLE VOLUME SUMMA1 .
CITY OF RENTON ITEM NO. 1_-__UL.-- 21.___---
S 3RD ST E OF MILL AVE 53 Wa ITEM
A . M. VOLUMES P. M. VOLUMES
15 MIN .. HOURLY TIME 15 MIN. HOURLY
02/22/78 * 12 : 15 * 18
WEDNESDAY * 12 : 30 * 8
1 * 12 : 45 * 13
2 3 * 01 : 00 * 10 49
* 01 : 15 * 18
*. 01 : 30 * . _. 9
1 * 01 : 45 * 18
1 2 * 02 : 00 * 11 56
_ * 02: 15 * 9
* 02 : 30 * 13
* 02 ; 45 * 10
1 1 * 03 : 00 * RECEIVED 16 48
* 03 : 15 * CITY OF RENTON 18
* 0 3 : 3 0 * HEARING EXAMINER 14
1 . . . . * 03 : 45. * . JUN 1 31978 21
1 * 04 : 00 * Am 1413 66
1
* 04 : 30 * 7,8,9,10,)L12E1,2,31446
3 * 04 : 45 * , 25
4 * 05 : 00 * . 10 62
*. .0 5:15 * _ .. 17
1 ' * 05 : 30 * 19
3 * 05 : 45 * 14
9 14 * 0.6 : 0.0 * ._. 24 , 74 .... .
12 * 06 : 15 * 16
13 * 06 : 30 * 15
23
* 06 : 45 * 12
20 6I * 07 : 00 * 16 59
22 * 07 : 15 * 11
R7 * 07 : 30 * 12 -
36 * 07 : 45 * 13
25 110 * 08 : 00 * 10 46
15 * 08 : 15 * 9
15 * 08 : 30 * 6
17 * 08 : 45 * 7
12 59 * 09 : 00 * 7 29. _... ...
13 * 09 : 15 * 13
6 * 09 : 30 * 6
10 * 09 : 45 * 11
10 39 * 10:00 * 7 37
13 02/21/78 * 10: 15 * 6
14 . TUESOAY * 10 : 30 * 3
13 * 10 : 45 * 3
8 48 * 11 :00 * 3 . 15
13 . * 11 : 15 *. . 4 .. ..
10 ' * 11 :30 * 3
6 * 11 : 45 * 3
18 47 .. * 12 :00 * 1 11. ...__..._....�_... _.
PEAK VOLUMES OF 110 FROM 07 : 00 TO 08 : 00 A. M. AND 74 FROM 05 : 00 TO 06 : 00 P. r
AM PEAKING ' FACTOR '0. 11 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0.07
AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0. 76 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0. 74
24 HOUR VOLUME 948 16 HOUR VOLUME. 897 ' EXPANSION FACTOR ' 1 .00
ADJUSTED 24 HOUR VOLUME ' 00001 .00
M/n AICLE VOLUME SUMMARY
CITY OF RENTON
S 3RD ST E OF MILL AVE a EB
AeM, VOLUMES P. M. VOLUMES
15 MINe HOURLY . TIME 15 MINe HOURLY
1 02/22/78 * 12 : 15 * 17
2 WEDNESDAY * 12 : 30 * 14
2 . . _ . * 12: 45 * 10
5 * 0i :00 * 19 60
3 * 01 : 15 * 12
*. 01 :30.. *..: 8
*. 01 : 45 * 12
3 6 * 02 : 00 * 14 46
— * 0 2: 15 *.. . 24
1 * 02: 30 * . 13
2 * 02 : 45 * 16
3 _. .* 03 :00 * 16 : 69
1 * 03: 15 * 25
* 03 : 30 * 24
1.. * .03 : 45 * . . 23
2 . * 04 : 00 * . 29 10.1
* 04 : 15 * 19
*._ 04.: 30 * 20
1 . * 04 : 45 * 32
1 * 05 : 00 * . 21 92
* 0 5 : 15 * __... 35
1 * 05: 45 * 29
1 2 • ' * 06: 00 * .... 27 120
1
1 *. 06 : 30 *. • ' . 21
2 .9 - * 07: 00 * . 15 81
1 * 07 : 15 . * 16
1 * 07: 30 * 10
2 * 07 : 45 * . . 9
4 ,. A . * 08 : 00 * 13 . 48
4 * 08 : 15 * 12 .
14 * 08 :45 * 8
7 29
5 . ' . * 09 : 15 * 11
U. * 09 : 30 * 17
5 28 * .10: 0.0 * 12 54
14 . 02/2.1/78 * 10: 15 * . . 11 .
7 TUESDAY * 10:30 *..._. .. 10.:_.. ... . _.._.. �__..
9 * 10 : 45 * 6 .
12 . 42 * 11 : 00 * 7 34
9 *. 11 : 15 *. ._. _ .. _..
7 . a * 11 :30 * 6 , •
15 * 11 : 45 * 4
14 45 * 12 .00 * 8 2
PEAK VOLUMES OF' • 45 FROM 11 : 00 TO 12 : 00 A .M. AND , 120 FROM 05 :00 TO_ _
06 00
P. M.
AM PEAKING FACTOR. 0 .04 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0. 12 '
AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0075 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0e85
24 HOUR VOLUME 952 ' 16 HOUR VOLUME , 879 EXPANSION FACTOR 1 00
ADJUSTED 24 HOUR .VOLUME. 00001e00 " '
• HICLE VOLUME SUMMARY
CITY OF RENTON
RENTON AVE S S OF S 3RD ST TOTAL
A. M. VOLUMES P . M. VOLUMES .
15 MIN. HOURLY TIME 15 MIN. HOURLY
1 02/22/78 * 12 : 15 * .. 21
1 WEDNESDAY * 12 : 30 * 12
1 . . * 12 : 45 * 17
2 5 * 01 : 00 * 19 69
* 01 : 15 * 20
1 - _. _.. * 01 : 3 0. *... . 11
1 * 01 : 45 * 26
4 6 * 02 : 00 * 16 73
* . 02 : 15 * . . 21
1 * 02: 30 * 19
1 * 02 : 45 * 18
1 3 ._ * 03: 00 * 19 77
1 * 03 : 15 * 29
* 03 ; 30 * 32
* 03: 45 * . 26 .
1 * 04 : 00 * 30 117
* 04 : 15 * 19
*. 04 : 30 * _ . . . 24
3 * 04 : 45 * 32
1 4 * 05 : 00 * 20 95
''f.._0 5 :15 * - 32 . .
1.. _. * 05 : 30 * 26
1 * 05: 45 * 27
'9 11 --.*.....06: 00 * 26 111
9 * 06 : 15 * 23
10 * 06: 30 * 20
*.. 06 : 45 * 21
16 ' 48 . * 07 :00 * 16 80 =,
19 * , 07 : 15 * 13
16 *. 07 :30 * 13
22
17 74 * 08 : 00 * 14 53
14 * 08 : 15 *_.. 9
15 :
19 * 08 : 45 * 13
10 . 58 _ .._ , . * 09 : 00 * 15 . . . 45 __.
12 * 09 : 15 * 19
9 * 09 : 30 * 17
13 . * 09 : 45 * 14
10 44 * 10 : 00 * 10 60
15 . . * 10 : 15 * 5
12 * 10 :30 . .............. ._._..._...... 5
11 02/21/78 * 10 : 45 * 3
14 52 • TUESDAY * 11 :00 * 6 19
8 4_.1.1 : 1.5. '� ....__ 3
11 d * 11 :30 * 5
16 * 11 : 45 * 3
17 - _' 62 - *.._.12 : 00 : .._. . ... 4 1
PEAK VOLUMES OF 74 FROM 07 : 00 TO 08: 00 A. M. AND 117 FROM 03: 00 TO 04 ►00 P. h
AM PEAKING FACTOR 0. 06 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0• 09
AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0• 84 PM PEAK HOJR FACTOR 0.91
24 HOUR VOLUME 1182 16 HOUR VOLUME 1118 EXPANSION FACTOR 1'®00^
ADJUSTED 24 HOUR. VOLUME 00001 .00
:01 ICLE VOLUME SUMMARY
CITY OF RENTON
MILL AVE S S OF S 3RD ST TOTAL
P .M.A.M. VOLUMES VOLUMES
15 MIN. HOURLY TIME. 15 MIN. HOURLY
• 1 02/22/78 * 12: 15 * 24
5 v4EDNESDAY * 12 : 30 * 17
• 1 _ * 12: 45 * 9
7 * 01 :00 * 7 57
* 01 : 15 * 7
5 __
1 * 01 : 45 * 8
* 02 : 00 * 16 37
8
_
2 * 0230 * 11
1 * 02: 45 * 7
3 _ 6 * 03: 00 * 9. 35 _
* 03 : 15 * • 15
3 * 03 : 30 * 1.0
4 * 03: 45 * 14
7 * 04 : 00 N. 10 469
* 04: 15 * 15 .
14
04 : 0 4
_ _
4 04 : 45 * 12
* 0500 * 15 56
• 05 : 15 * 12
* 05:30 * 18
2 * 05: 45 * 17
2 * 06: 00 * 25 72
4 * 06 : 15 * 9
2 * 06: 30 * 7
4 4 06 : 45 * 25
9 , 19 4 07 :00 * 19 60
3 - * 07: 15 * 18
8 07 :30 * 15
* 07 ;45 * 12
8: 24 * 08 :00 * • 16 61
11 * 08: 15 * 19
3 * 08 :30 *
4 • * 08: 45 * 6
10 28 • * 09 ; 00 * 10 40
7 * 09 : 15 * 22
* 09 : 30 •* 15
)0 09: 45 •* _ _ 17
12 36 02/21/78 * 10: 00 * 2 56
6 TUESDAY * 10: 15 *
3 * 10 :30 * 4
11 * 10 : 45 * 3
10 30. * 11 :00 * • 2 15
10 • * 11 : 15 * 3
7 , * 11 : 30 * 2 ,
8 * 11 : 45 *
7 32 , * 12: 00 * 4 15
PEAK VOLUMES OF 38 FROM 1,0 :30 TO 11 : 30 A.M. AND 77 FROM 0630 TO07 : 30 P. M
AM PEAKING. FACTOR 0. 05 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0• 10
AM PEAK. HOUR FACTOR 0.79 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0. 77
24 HOUR VOLUME 750 16 HOUR VOLUME 692 ExPANSION FACTOR 1000
ADJUSTED 24 HOUR VOLUME 00001 .00
- RECEIVED
RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE CITY OF RENTON
SUITE 206 HEARING EXAMINER
16625 REDMOND WAY Jt11t! 1 31978
REDMOND, WA 98052 AM PM
(206) 883-8814 7,8,9,IQIlli121112134415I6
APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS
FRANK R. RANEY, MAI, ARA
EXPERIENCE:
Owner, Raney Appraisal Service. Performed independent contract appraisals on all types
of properties, as industrial, commercial. residential, rural recreational and agricultural
properties and extensive condemnation work. Properties appraised include service stations,
retail properties, dwellings, parks and recreational sites. shopping centers, gravel pits ,
apartment complexes and similar properties in urban, suburban and rural areas.
Valuations of large tracts and of historical tracts for Indian Claims Commission.
Typical clients include State Department of Highways, State Parks and Recreation Comm-
ission, City of Bellevue, Wa., and other municipalities, U. S. Department of Justice..
GSA, Bonneville Power Administration, Army Corps.of Engineers and other federal and
state units, individuals and business firms.
Prepared and reviewed appraisals for National Park Service over a territory comprising the
western half of the United States. Reviewed appraisals by fee and staff persons. Prepared
gross estimates of land value of proposed park sites. Established standards and specifica-
tions for preparation of appraisals far National Park Service, including outtlining needs for
special purpose appraisals, as for life estates. scenic easements, retention of timber rights
or mineral rights. etc. Served on Park Planning and Study teams to study feasibility of
park, rate of developmentof individual parks, access areas to scenic or historic sites ap-
propriateness of commercial development and permitted uses.
As contract appraiser, worked extensively on urban and rural park lands, on beach lands.
lake frontages, river islands and other urban and rural recreational lands.
Prior experience includes staff and review appraiser, National Park Service, 1966-68:
staff appraiser, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1961-66: and Work Unit Conservationist, Soil
Conservation Service, 1946-61.
EDUCATION AND TRAINING:
Graduate, University of Idaho, 1944. B. S. Degree in Agricultural Economics.
Special training includes American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers' courses I, II, ill
(Rural), IV (Condemnation), VI (Capitalization by Ellwood), and American Society of
Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers' course on Rural Appraisal, and SRA course on Apart-
ment Appraisal. Completion of numerous seminars on right of way, land use, environment-
al matters, etc.
COURT EXPERIENCE:
Qualified as expert real estate valuation witness in Superior Courts of Washington State,
in Federal Court and with the Department of Justice in Indian Claims Cases.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
Member, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers (MAI)
Accredited Rural Appraiser (ARA), American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Ap-
praisers.
Member, Columbia Basin Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers.
EXHItIT NO. 02
ITEM NO. /7ff- 71
RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE
SUITE 206
16625 REDMOND WAY
REDMOND, WA 98052
(206) 883-8814
RURAL APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS •
FRANK R. RANEY, MAI, ARA
Owner, Raney Appraisal Service: Independent appraisals on fee or contract on all types
of properties, including rural, recreational, agricultural, industrial, commercial, resid-
ential, etc.
National Park Service: (1966-68) Reviewed appraisals prepared by fee or staff apprais-
ers from many segments of the area west of the Mississippi River, for the purpose of Nat-
ional Parks acquisition. Specific emphasis was on San Juan Islands of Washington, Nez
Perce Park in Idaho, rural lands in Colorado, North Dakota, Arizona and California. Per-
sonally prepared full appraisal reports on many of these lands, including properties with
natural wonders, historic sites, forested lands, farm land, residential and commercial
properties. Unique assignments included appraisal of life estates and scenic easements.
Bureau of Indian Affairs: (1961-66) Fair market value and fair annual rental of tribal and
Indian trust lands in Washington, Oregon and Idaho. Lands included timber, mineral sites,
potential and devel oped irrigated and dry farming areas, grazing lands, commercial, ind-
ustrial, residential, resort and recreational sites. Types of transactions for which appraisals
were required were acquisition, disposal, partition and exchange of lands, leases for
farming, grazing, industrial and business uses, rights of way for utilities, canals, roads,
etc. Frequently, lands presented an exceptional range of problems and types in partial
takings, severance, damages, easements, special use rights, water and grazing rights,
conversion to a higher or lower use or multiple uses, etc. Real 'estate appraised ranged
from unimproved desert lands to improved urban properties.
Soil Conservation Service: (1946-61) Administration of work unit and coordination of
work of personnel, including range specialists, hydrologists, foresters, soils scientists,
engineers, farm planners, etc. Included land use studies, estimation of alternative enter-
prises and feasibilities, income potentials of alternate enterprises, studies of soil, water
and vegetative cover in various locations in Washington and Idaho. Dry land areas of
high and low rainfall, grazing lands, timber lands and irrigation farming areas comprised
the types of lands. Experience in irrigation includes working with farmers in a newly ir-
rigated area of the Columbia Basin in Washington State between 1955 and 1961 at Pasco,
Washington and at Moses Lake, Washington. Worked closely with agricultural engineers,
irrigation specialists, farmers, to develop irrigation systems, level land, select crops .
etc. Also included advisement on leases, terms, etc. , for absentee landlords and crop
share farmers: also farmers with minimal capital and little experience in irrigation farm-
ing. The 800 operating irrigated units at Moses Lake required work in reservoir construc-
tion, sprinkler irrigation, pipe laying, ditching, land leveling, etc. Cost sharing, ease-
ments, etc. . to solve drainage problems arising from irrigation were also worked out.
RAINY APPRAISAL SERVICE
SUITE 206
16625 REDMOND WAY
REDMOND, WA 98052
(206) 883-8814
RECREATIONAL LANDS APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS
FRANK R. RANEY, MAI, ARA
Owner, Raney Appraisal Service. As fee or contract appraiser, .have worked extensively
on urban and rural park lands. Experience includes preparing fair market value apprais-
als of improved and unimproved lands in Green River Gorge and Marymoor Park in King
County, on beach lands of the Washington coast, and assistance in appraisal of extensive
lake frontage lands, islands in the Columbia River, and Fort Lawton. Also studies of ac-
quisition costs for proposed parks in urban and semi-urban areas of Washington. Compre-
hensive consultation service with staff members of State Parks and Recreation Commission.
Employed by contract with State and Federal agencies and several cities in park acquisi-
tion.
While with the National Park Service, prepared and reviewed appraisals over a territory
comprising the western half of the United States. The property appraised included all
types and classes of land, as resort and recreational sites, commercial, industrial and res-
idential real estate in areas ranging from wilderness areas to metropolitan properties .
These lands were acquired for inclusion in the National Park System.
Performed comprehensive review of real estate appraisals prepared by fee and staff ap-
praisers in urban, suburban and rural areas.
Prepared gross estimates of land value of proposed National Park sites. This required an
overall value of the land and acquisition costs and alternative plans with alternate costs
of acquisition. The data were presented to Congress prior to that body's introduction of
enabling legislation for new acquisition to the Park system of recreational lands.
Established standards and specifications by which fee appraisers would prepare appraisals
for the Park Service. This included outlining needs for special purpose appraisals, as for
life estates, scenic easements, retention of timber and mineral rights, etc.
Served on Park Planning and Study Teams to study feasibility of park, rate of development
of individual parks, access areas to scenic or historic sites, appropriateness of commercial
development and permitted concessions.
4,•
CP. z THE CITY OF RENTON
'' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
ba
0 ; CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
?,o 235-2550
4 D SEP1 °
MEMORANDUM
June 15 , 1978
TO: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
BY: Gary R. Kruger, Senior Planner GRK
RE: Renton Hill Rezone--Phase I
File No. R-178-78; City of Renton Request for Rezone
In response to your memo of June 14 , the subject property
was zoned GS-1 prior to October, 1963, -when it was
rezoned R-3.
RECEIVED
GRx: jb CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
JUN201978
AM PM
7,Si91101111121112i3i4o5,6
EXHIBIT NO. .3�
ITEM NO. /7 - 7,
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
!I!N 1 61978
AM PM
7,.R,9dd0,11,12,1,2,3,405,6
RECEIVED
. CITY OF RENTON
... HEARING EXAMINER
oF' R - JUN 2 01978
4 �',e; AM PIS
U41Q Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7,8,9,10,11,121L,2,314155,€
.. BUILDING DIVISION 235-2540 !
�,o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
O,Q�lFO SEP��.k<� June 16, 1978
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI EXHIBIT NO. -37
MAYOR
ITEM NO, ,-- / 7K- 7f
TO: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
FROM: Building Division
SUBJECT: Building Activity on Renton Hill
Following is the requested list of building permits for new
construction and remodeling on Renton Hill for the years 1963
through 1978 to date:
ADDITIONS, REMODELING
NEW CONSTRUCTION & GARAGES
1963 1 Residence 8
1 6-Unit Apartment
1964. 1 Residence 7
1965 1 Residence 4
1966 ' 2 Residences 2
1 7-Unit Apartment
1967 - 3
1968 4 Residences 7
1969 2 Residences 4
1970 1 Residence 6 •
1971 - 4
RECEIVED
1972 - 5 CITY OF RENTON,
' HEARING EXAMINER
1973 1 Residence 3 JUN 161978
1974 - '. 4 AM PM
7 8Ig11O1111121I12131415*
1975 1 Residence 3
1976 l .Residence 5
1 8-Unit Apartment
L. Rick Beeler
Page two
June 16, 1978
ADDITIONS, REMODELING
NEW CONSTRUCTION & GARAGES
1977 4 Residences 4
1978 3 Residences -
TOTAL 22 Residences
3 Apartments (21 Units) 69
RGN/mp
cc: Planning Department
E XI I I-TT NO.
4 it'•,,ITEM NO. /7r- 7r
'► T- = THE CITY OF RENTON
c, .® ;;� b 2
2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
2 co' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI y MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
June 8, 1978 RECEIVED . 235-2550
0 �
f D cFot CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
AM .JUN' 01978
PM
Mr. William Graham 7,8,9r10a1Ic12:a.1 a2se3'114515
2286 W. 12th Avenue
Vancouver, B.C. V6K 2N3
RE: CEDARCREST, P.U.D. APPLICATION PPUD-172-78 (Job #6420) •
Dear Mr. Graham:
The various municipal departments have reviewed the tentative P.U.L.
plan for Cedarcrest and have the following comments:
1. Utilizing the density calculations of the P.U.G. Ordinance
the maximum density for such development, assuming a single
family residential underlying zone, is 48 dwelling units.
We would be interested in further information about the
incorporation of the powerline rights-of-way as part of •
the gross site area which you mentioned in your May 26,
1978, letter. This would have an'effect on density and
would, more than likely, place the proposed 53 dwelling
unit maximum of Cedarcrest within an acceptable single
family residential P. U.D. density.
2. We have geologic information that indicates a possibility
of unstable slopes on this site, together with mined-out
coal beds. The slope on a majority of the site ranges
from 25% to 35% and in certain areas up to 60%. More
detailed information will be needed regarding existing
conditions and the proposed development. This will
include additional grading plans to indicate the extent
of grading and assess the various impacts of such grading
(proposed cut and fill ).
3. The landscape plan indicates undisturbed existing natural
areas. It appears from review of the site plan that larger
areas between buildings, around the site perimeter, and
within the existing drainage ravines can be retained.
Certain shifts in building and improvements may be necessary
to better achieve the preservation of the existing natural
character of the site. No clearing and grading shall be
permitted until after preliminary P.U.G. approval . More
detailed information will be necessary regarding preserva-
tion areas, as well as the requirement to supplement these
buffer areas and the areas cleared by development with
additional trees and landscaping. Landscape plans will be
required with the preliminary P. U. D. submittal .
,i
•
Mr. William Graham
June 8, 1978
Page Two
4. Noise will be a factor due to the proximity of FAI-405.
Additional information will be necessary to demonstrate methods
to be applied in mitigating the noise impacts on the develop-
ment. (i .e. , additional and existing tree buffers, construc-
tion techniques, setbacks, etc. )
5. You mention in your May 26, 1978, letter additional traffic
and parking information. This information will be necessary
to assess the relative impacts of the development on the
existing roadways in the area.
6. Fire Department may require an additional emergency vehicle
access only. This possibility should be reviewed. Also,
fire hydrant and fire flow requirements shall meet Fire
Department requirements.
7. The existing natural drainage ravines must be preserved and
enhanced. This will require rearrangement of the single
family lots along Renton Avenue South and the valley play
area. The pedestrian system can be designed to utilize these
natural areas provided any impacts are minimal .
8. Suitable drainage facilities will be necessary to mitigate
potential impacts of site alteration and increased runoff
and erosion. These should be coordinated with the Engineer-
ing Division, which has indicated the need for detailed plans.
9. A proposed declaration of environmental significance has
been issued for the subject development. An environmental
impact statement will be necessary unless the additional
information mentioned above is provided, together with
proposed mitigating measures that if provided would reduce
Potential impacts to such an extent that a final negative
declaration of environmental impact could be issued for
the proposal .
10. Buildings #29-30 and #20-21 should be shifted a minimum of
an additional 10 feet away from the highway right-of-way
to provide adequate screening and buffering.
11. Additional information regarding safe function of the steep
driveways into some of the downhill garages is needed. It
appears that an unsafe backing uphill onto the primary circu-
lation road will result if designed as proposed.
12. The visitor parking area off the end of Cedar Avenue South
should be. redesigned or relocated to provide a more aesthet-
ically pleasing entrance and reduce impacts to the natural
area in this portion of the project.
Mr. William Graham
June 8, 1978
Page Three
13. Suitable utilities shall be provided for the project. The
Utilities Division has noted the need for a short 8" water
main extension to the south. This and other utilities require-
ments must be coordinated with the Utilities Division.
14. The Engineering Division has indicated that off-site improve-
ments are required along the portion of the site adjacent to
Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South.
15. Access into the site must be more specifically reviewed in
terms of grade and site distance. How does the proposed access
relate to the existing Cedar Crest access and the adjacent
public right-of-way?
We hope that the above information will be helpful to you in your plan-
ning process for the proposed development. Once the additional informa-
tion on environmental impact is provided and a final declaration issued,
you may apply for preliminary P.U.D. approval based on the above noted
comments and the application requirements of the P.U.D. ordinance
(Section 4-2710).
If you have any further questions, please contact this department.
Very truly yours,
Gordon Y. Ericksen
Planning Director ,-
;' /'
Michael L. Smith
Associate Planner
MLS:wr
cc: Gene Farrell
Harstad Associates
% / e
pF
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • . PLANNING DEPARTMENT
o 235-2550
0 •
,9�T f0 SEP-F' '
June 19 , 1978
Mr . William Graham
2286 W . 12th Avenue
Vancouver , B . C . V6K 2N3
RE : CEDARCREST , TENTATIVE P . U .D .
Dear Mr . Graham :
As per our meeting of June 14 , 1978 , regarding the above-
mentioned subject , we discussed the comments expressed in
our June 8 , 1978 , letter to you , and the subsequent procedures
for Tentative P . U .D . approval and Preliminary P . U .D . appli-
cation .
•
As we discussed at the meeting , th'e Tentative P .U .D . basically
•
meets staff approval with the comments noted . However , we do
• need the additional information discussed in items 2 through 5
of the June 8 , 1978 , letter in order to complete our environs
mental threshold determination process pursuant to the State
Environmental Policy Act . Host of this information can be in
the form of written clarification of the project as it relates
to these items . Any environmental review during the Tentative
P . U . D . phase will apply to the Preliminary P . U . D . application .
We are confident that this review can be completed expedi-
. tiously once we have received the necessary information . If
you have any questions or need additional information , please
contact this Department .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Ericksen RECEIVE®
Pla nine drec r
A CITY ®F RENTON
j1 � HEARING EXAMINER
4.` " Ul 2 01978
/Tlichael L . Smit �{� PM
` Associate Planner ?4,S191101111121.fl121314,516
HLS : jb 4
cc : Gene Farrell
Harstad Association �/
EXHIBIT NO. �!_
ITEM— - —
- — NO. W - i 7F- �� . . J
. �,.
M. r
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 20, 1978
TO: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
FROM: Clint Morgan JUN 2 01978
AM PM
1819,1011111211 121314,5,6
SUBJECT: File No. R-178-78; City of Renton Request for Rezone
As per your memo of June 14, 1978, the following information and responses have
been prepared.
1 . Analysis of existing traffic capacities and volumes on Mill Street at the
access point to Renton Hill . (intersection of South 3rd Street at Mill
and Houser Way South)
The traffic signalized intersection of South 3rd Street at Mill and
Houser Way South is the critical point of access to Renton Hill .
Analysis of the total intersection capacity under existing conditions
shows a capable increase of 36%. The estimated increase in the intersection
traffic demand due to the R-3 zoning of 10.5 acres is 18.5%.
It is, therefore, possible for the intersection to absorb the increased
demand. A reapportionment of the controller splits would be the only
required adjustment.
•
However, because of short storage space between the intersection of South
3rd Street at Main and South 3rd Street at Mill and Houser Way South, it
would not be a desirable increase to absorb. We would have to take time
from the eastbound heavy flow of traffic to increase the northbound time.
2. Analysis of the existing traffic capacities and volumes on Cedar Ave. South,
Renton Ave. South, South 7th Street, South 9th Street, South 10th Street,
and South 11th Street. Can these streets and the aforementioned absorb
additional traffic? If so, how much?
The following list of locations are the 1978 recorded weekday traffic
volumes (total 24-hour vehicle count) .
a. Cedar Ave. South, south of South 3rd St. 511
b. Renton Ave. South, south of South 3rd St. 1 ,182
c. Grant Ave. South, south of South 7th St. 171
•sr,4y 1(a+- ;T ?Tpri `.'euTt/ 2 /
ITEM NO. - / 7 .�..
Rick Beeler
Page 2
June 20, 1978
Due to low traffic activity, the remaining locations mentioned above have
not been counted for traffic volumes.
The existing traffic volumes for Renton Hill for the streets listed above
are low in comparison to what the streets can absorb with the one exception
of Cedar Ave. South, which has on-street parking on both sides. Parking
on both sides does restrict the free flow of two-way traffic. The right-
a-way width and street width are substandard, measuring 40 feet and 27 feet
respectively when they should measure 50 feet and 32 feet respectively.
The traffic volume on Cedar Ave. South could increase to a total volume of
900 to 1000 vehicles per day and still function with parking on both
sides depending on driver's tolerance to restricted flow. Any increase
beyond this volume would probably necessitate restriction of the parking
to one side so as to allow free flow of two-way traffic which would provide
better emergency vehicle access and a more safe driving condition.
According to past studies of R-3 zoning in similar conditions, a full
development of 10.5 acres for low rise apartments would generate approx-
imately 1350 vehicle trips per day. This would be enough to necessitate
the restriction of parking on one side.
Renton Ave. has the same substandard conditions in regard to right-a-way
and street width (26') but parking has already been restricted to one side.
R-1 zoning with the proposed PUD development would generate approximately
425 vehicle trips per day. This would probably allow traffic volumes to
remain below the marginal conditions which would necessitate the restriction
of parking on Cedar.
3. Analysis of the traffic capacities, circulation and volumes on these
streets in 1963. Please provide what information you have regarding this.
There are no traffic capacity records dating back to 1963.
4. What date was FAI-405 begun and completed?
According to the information we have available, the 1-405 freeway was
begun in 1963-64 and opened in 1967.
5. Analysis of alternative access to the subject properties in view of the
existing R-3 zoning. What studies, if any, were done regarding the
extension of Grant Avenue South?
According to the records, four alternate routes were given preliminary
consideration for access in 1972. They are as follows:
Route A - This is a proposed straight connection between
the two existing Grant Avenues.
Rick Beeler
Page 3
June 20, 1978
Route B - This is a' proposed connection between Renton Ave.
and Eagle Ridge Drive.
Route C - This is a proposed connection between Cedar Ave.
and Benson Road South
Route D - This is a proposed connection from Mill Ave. South
passing underneath the freeway 1-405 to South 4th Street
Please refer to the attached sketch for exact location.
After all routes were considered, Route A, which would provide a straight
connection between the two existing- Grant Avenues seemed to be the most
favored by the citizens committee formed at the time and Del Bennett, who
represented the city. This route would provide mostly straight alignment,
moderate grades and good connections to existing streets.
Routes B and C, while being less desirable because of street grades,
extensive fill or cuts or having a poor_ connection are feasible considerations.
Route D, which passes underneath 1-405, was considered unfeasible because
of low clearance and freeway columns interference with alignment location
of right-a-way.
The estimated cost of providing an alternate access in1972 was $160,000.
The cost probably would be considerably more now.
Full development of the R-3 zoned area would add approximately 1350 vehicle .
trips per day to the Renton Hill area according, to similar. studies.
Regardless of the type of zoning, the additional access route is recommended
by this department.
CEM:ad
Attachment
-,,,,_,--, ,,, • - 2500 Ft. Max. Grade - 57,,
L-..---zi ±:,' L;---C__ T4, -•-•=44'77._• .e. -: 1 I l'''' - - ', ROUTE "A". Len' • '
• /- / /A ------------ ..
;traight alignment, moderate
mos,.
.s-,--1.1 ,., .,..11 ..1:- . , , ts _• > -2-1 .4-i •, Or. „,.......,,,,' ,,..., •---.. grades, good connection to existing
. p'. 4'• ';.11: .-
--1 1,6:if-) 4:.%A,,i-..-1_7- ..i. • ;__ :'..._ _1.24° .
il
Max. Grade - 9%
---, ,, , 77,.(_-111'..; --,-.,_ ... , " '
i'.!',..„II1 [T,11:141:11...rioi.!,:--1 AI i-z+-', 1'4, " . _2)' —
. •• -=— -- ROUTE "B"' Length - 1850 Ft.
, " iL
— - - Gently curving, fairly steep grades
5r _. Fiii 12. _-7i. , _I. . .!, i--- .. , ,. ._, .,_.: ... __
It . t'. i:- [r w. 4-J--..-- , ',,..' ',, ' ,7 . •,` .._ti1. ' - .--•
..,_
-_..,1,-_i.,„, i . ,.-:- -"I'>•1 - --... •••••" , 3 ;t1 .3 .: ' • .' e.,;,.
throughout, disruption of valley
area due to extensive filling.
LL,.:[ ,.i,r> t >:,. , - : - , •,-- ,i ; f fi *" , / ,.41.-,-. , ..,..... -.?-•..... .;:.. .,
:::.•f. ' -' __ '.41__J... ','" ...01 ,,- 4. '''. ! 't IL-)
''.. 4T4 • .'-'' •\s.• . I 33
• ___.-
I'li'irr 1 1•1 [ '0:0 -. : .r,'-:') T...... ' ,7 . I !,7 ! !.I laL .ii: ss‘ ‘T•'.-„':: t..:',7,4•- ROUTE "C" Length - 2500 Ft.
''.,. "-] •I'. 2y) . irik . ri -4, ' .'• .)(1;,._ ,",• .---'\ c, -.- -/-- - Max. Grade - 9%
iit-,'' __,F,-.,=; '.s,-.: '-•
-(...1 P.' ,. .4, ..--4-•.,•I •••••-: if , Fairly tight curves, major slope
{.,'1.,.. iv, ,,,,e - ---111 . ,,-`'..1..' II rc• 'r7 , 7• ' \--1,•-•7
1 1 3 - 2-.11 4 Z.....A,, • cutting required, somewhat poor
'.--;,...,-', _... ,:k.... _,. -,-.,,,-,
.._ 3 , - Mg3.•,.- 1_, --...... t " .,t. !I r:. . :I I- - !.., \•,.. -. connection at Benson Road.
•
t2'...--` r:t ] flii---:r-1: • : •1 r'-'—: ' I 1-11n:i
,• , . i 1. .i_ 1..-7 7 id IJJ: ,.., t _. ,,,, ,,ti. , .
• ,,,,
t- ' • .1- -i '' --. :
---'.-..---.....- ---------..., •-•.--,...--
• 4,__ ZO,,.7.- t.-4,,i--,.•:1:-,, I• • ' '; .1 ' " :, IE''. i: DLL- ,-,- 1
-....6)..7: . .. - ;! 1 : : n, i -,,z .•,,. .„- . i
---
, ,
' ' - '-r'. .. •• ' 'j- A '1
-11--_'. ,r; r-i-,. LED] •., LT i .
-----
.i.,., /i,,,_._ri__/:/./[7_.7/. _;: .,,,,:,v,..,,a_,:zi, ,. ,,44/A-4•'1_.,,_ 1
A
: : !
,. .1.: r_____,,,, • , i
/'•9 4Z
. ._,1 •- ----------
----.. •-------' •
, i
i•••117 "........1 1 I
4.1 ZS_ n .1 3; ;.... ,. ',S• /
L----H---11
2,1::•l'i 'ii,---'z'-_'..",L, : 47:7., :
-...,,,,,...- •, ,,-, -, /,,/ .., , ....
1 4 S t a 3' 4 33 0
PHILLIP •
. .....____ 4 -". -<C2P'_ •
ARNOLD
_--- ...- - - -
,
,
,. • ,- 3,0 ,,I''• i pARK -- _-
1 / • .// ---, -, .,..,,, .,.. 2.i. ,
i• - - C°
t.II 1S I el• MI .0.4) ... 'Qs ..-• 9 l' -- - . --- NN P,'
/ • - Y • ''--'- 9° q--
I , A ,i ,....- . • .•
,)••:1 , -..-_...-. -
X. ' : r - 'Ir. 7- - ' - • • -
kl, /j' •i
I • -• \
U - . '` -
-ty - -- - , .)" ‘- g.,' LIU --•
,. . .• .: - - '
_ - r - -• -•, __- ,..
..- . , <
UJ . - .
s t2ENTos.7—viLLA.--GC.Pt_ - --' '''r ;:ii"-'< .
/•••• ' " ,.,_.- • „
1...-- . '..."'•>.
„ • - •
- --. 1 I Z,, ., •- \ \\
s• •
0 •.---
0 .' , -- ' • .
. , ac',, . , • ', ,,,
- .. ___. . .A _ ,---•
.,‘ .
c , ‘..
' ,
- r‘
- - 'l
; 1 0 1, -... - . . • ..
• •
."',..! •_ .1i•: 4 . 1 "•
a - 61.il
:. • , ,q 4 1 -; ‘A'?,‘" ' \• \,
• .' " I ' t'A' \I\, ..1 \ '•
7 '-''' • __..a.... ' .
? .7.t .1_ ''' -,' '. <./4 ' ' . • . ..- '11' — :e
. i..._L--• . ., -,s-i. ,
---Ap Ce .. e„.F.....:,..-----------------•.
„ I r ' i r 1 41/4 I 1 • •.‘,.-2•. /4.-- •
.,..Ia..."1r.,E..o...A._',.34,,_e.v_ie.O.A._0_I,:bf,I r-''n''''n't.3_4.1'44..3.9.3 2..63.I11..;..1'._-__-._-,4,t_r-_._--j4-.L1.[1•...-1/_•_,_",•'_d1iAM.4tt_-_s1;li It2-;D•_,s/.)...-.-__,.•s .A.../.)•.a.,..‘
,;. * \••k)„.‘0',.N •.\-\--.-
/\,\..s,s,\..,\.•.,
,e.0.G-j1.,.".A.,i.,,,..•...,
G
: -..•.'NI
:z•1t'Ai1'-,
-t_-
-2!,27-
si 1 / 4 ° (/ - 4 -7 1.--. 15!7•1t6"43-73L
„':t-!t,.•8`•1•r..•,4.i-.3"'",,,9C•\''",':','9 1e0.ti.'447s-;1'''"1 I;8i74''a7•:l*.;,_.',14 11>0,
1'7.:4..'..4.3-'•:.''.
1.•0.._,9.2;•7 j'A'•_-'2.',i1163_t;rZ77e1•.1 79..,.t,.Et1ge,-9•t,-,1,r-9_-&e q3,,0.3e.2,31,,_"•.',‘4.-...,...!_
..74.a
, —jiihal
K
:'u,34I(..`Nt:0'-i,.r:..c 4•,•'i•,9
.,,e11 k•'•-.'..,'.<e'.t
-'/.eoi,p...,•7,4;,.,.A,,..._ir*'l3.,,'#/..'.‘
I(.:"C.'.1A— \ - \ / iM ...9E
'1
..------ ., - - - -
• ' '.-- . ----------- --
e • Iv .101, ,,\ I
e dr"
3.3.
4,
. .,
... , .
0.
-49 , e ' • , . ':, ,s• ,
!..Jn 4# . IS .•_. _Jo._ , \ $‘, •,,
-$. 0 ,ui
--tt----e- ----,,,F
.0' •,e• ,,, I . •- e
, !
RE.D ‘......1E...\__ Ol--.1 .., \ s‘s I"""• I , 12. 1 3
\\ 1
r..A,L T ES,O :AL BO I HILL
. .., . PARK 1 \\ c..1_4 00 L- , s N, N.:41 .,-
--
, • ..••••.:• • ..,•,-;,•,'...;,r...r.,-.. .L.Y•••.r7....,..,•••r•••k-..1.,:•••••••••••••••5-•••44,•,,,Art;•••',..••••;•' ; •••.,;•'"•.,:,....•.',..:1',;', •:'.'??.?,,•,-.,,. ,,;,/,),%,',.-:.:i'•ty;-,- ,,,,,,, t,,,,,•i, ,.,,,,4.,,o,,,,, ..,:;.,,,,),-.•.,,'...., •,,,L; --7------!7,-----77'! , ';',-'" -,';',.•':.'i'":.•••-i••:.'f,•':•;•:'••'.:',‘:,'‘..,1,'1".1,'qf'..4:'•••'''t,''t;':+"-4.',1;,',.01t,,'',.kY,.i'4.,..1",f.-.I'4.4 -;:...'ii:r'e•;;',•;',..';•;;!;:.."'d.'114.:••r-''..' '.i..".' V"',.''";X' ..:,.;,••,•',''..'d'';••i'..•`,•:.'•'•••';:0;"..f'...c ,...K
, • • • ...; . : :',:'•••'''.;:-.'• ''....:'••'''..:'''''..c.':`"tr:.:;1:'-1.,,:';•'....'‘...'••. 1•,4 •••••'...• .4'....';-.:•:o7:Ci•:,',i,-,...(.. .';'14,'',',:i;:',! • •'' ,,,• .,,. •:•r i•.+ .••4;1:iv.. ' ,, ;!‘,1.•,t...-,„..,.,:;,;.,.;:, • • ',',-;.
,,. ..,;;--.;‘,,:•,,,•,-;-.'1-.,,;;;•:,;;:,,;;;.•;;,;;•,,;,;,..• ;.-J4,,i,,,;•,,:: ; :,,,,.,.,..1.,..:-14:i',..s!,,;til•!.r.4''', 0.),, •'0'1.'...',.''''.'. ','i:`,:•1 '..••?-'•',..,;'s..`,"••;.' : (t'',:.-'' :::.••;''''''. .4:•14.71;i:•4•''.` -.•••••'-,•'4'.A`.;:4•0•ii' '•;''••.:'`•••A•,,., ..•. ;,:',.':,1,•;"-.,.,, q,,•;,:':::.',+.,:..4,1,,:.• ":.,' 1!,
..'.':.'::,:. .,..:.i.,',''''',.:',..,.',.':;.. . '•-:'',1:.".!'".'•;1:;:?.."Y'...,',.•',..",.: A ..... ......?.,:o..,,14.,..1,..,•.,/77,..:,,f,7 -‘,/..'d.P;i:il'F.,111..•"'';• .:••',.•:'Is-i: •.1,;,:i,.1._„ ,-'1'.;:f•;`,..t:a 7.;d i,',':;:,'• ''••••••::.:It.i.(1,:-...'!4.-1.4.',..A':••4''....".•-•',',!,'-L-• ' '....,v,•
•'•:'..........''••`;'. •,'.-.1....P: ••,'::.•,:11:':•••:,.-!-.'.':•.1,•.:.T.,.•,' •ri',,' 'i'.':*•.'•.,;.;., ,., ,•;-.1.;!ti;..,k,•,,,,•;,'„ 4'4,:i;;;*;),;',',;;!;,.';'‘;,;,..,;,,..;...•..•‘'.';'.. . ..; i.!;••,,,",'::;!;`;.:f;j.:5.'• ',;.' '•(,';',..;',',',.•,...!:.''','.....'7'.::,.,),'i.:;'i?;2•,::"•:.:'.1::•'' :•.'. "
•.•''.;n::::..;s .: • ,..:4".••• ;•.'•-;,..;';:•;;- •'' :•••• ::'.."•.,;'• i:t... :'-:•,,.t'':.•'!'•'•;••••••;-.? '[' .;.: ..1,.-... Xr :i•• ..,-'••i-•,-, e.'‘‘.•'• •:-.•,•,' :•.)- ••,"'l• .•:',•t''' •-;•- '•••-••'." .4.'v-•• • - • •-
•' '', t'..•;,•• ...:.+,...;-:•:li. *' ....,.' .-,-': ....'• ,-,•••••••`:::).•:.•,;2J :::::'•!.';')..r.,.•':-;',1:;,?..‘frA!....i.'17:',cr.'i'..;;751;41.; ,:i.,..'•,,,,,.,7,,.:1,w.',,,,, ,•c:,-.•4::-.,;;.,..,r.1 ' ',.;,.4..:, ...;f.,.:4,-.:„.•:•:;":-,..4:::.••,•:,;.4, •;4,.:',.'f:••••••‘,',.,)-- ...,.4',:fc..-'.':•:•-• - ••••••4%, .
•.-,...',..•ro:i".'.•••:4:-.:(`•-•,,".4.:;'',,:,••••,'..::'•::::-.1...:-.';•••:,:.---•:-?t::....:::••:-:-.,•;•),,,,•:-...,..,,•,.,...1.,,,,,:,?........,:,,,,,-,,i,,,,,.7,.t,i.,,,,...,•,,„:4.....,;,-•;f:•.„. .;,-4,•, ,t..••••'...':‘,,'..:.•.'t ;;::-.:',.",....0•••,":..;','..i..N.,4,•',,;•••.,:.',•;.,,,-,•ti.;•:':•.;',•;.t;':!.:,..:::,::':•;,.., ...'.-.,`„:,,,'' '.:;!;,•.,,z..,,,....;.;. ..,•;;; .:11,, '
- • .;t•.'.':....'....:.•:".....1'',;.‘.:"r:.5';'•i;•..••‘'''''':.-.::':-:.';',...:**,'"::,;;„'.1.4:4'..'...',',..'N';:;;;7.:!r‘I':',.c,....:•.%'Y'f,..'r,b,.•,'''0::';::•.,:!'..;•Atn j•,;:1;;,...,.i t;•;'141 :;-0,.....,);,,..':,;.'.' :%:;;:':.':,,,,‘•;,.1,•;',..i.', ,'.'' ,,.';,,,,'..„.';•,,-:,,.,.t i.i.,,,..:, ...,.....,t:4%t 9'p'r.%,,'!:1,....,7:. '''':' :'::'q !
.,..,-...,..-.,...::......„ ,:,..,..-..c.',.6.•;;:.,:,..:•:•:••.,,,,...*:••...:-..,,•,;,....::,•:•,: -,:,...;.:::-.•i,..t•;.!:,s.,-,,...4',,,,;r,, •,.rd';,i,;;.,f..t.:,:',.-i1,•:..d.t't,',..,:.:,••;',,•••••-',';,...):,;;;;,:;'!'.,:-.,:,''r:'..!';;;-'„'„.....; •..:;•n::•:,:'';:-..1,44.."zf,','.,-.;;•:,',,.'•'.r.',7'...'.•;,'`.:,-.''.•'...,i;..;;;•':.."!:.••:.,;.•..• '',f,s,''..,?;•••,::',,;•:;:;•!.',':,."?',1,:•;,..;•,,' .;.,I;
• • .. • ,. :,..• '.. ':,::: . f.,..,,, ••.• :k.'.,••••••. .-4,••,•'''.1••,.-i•••:',;-,el,',0 1•'•r;'4.0'•,,,:'1,••%-,."R'‘,-•i':'ii,',‘•,,,‘Z.,,i,,,,..;;••':‘,,, :'!:r''.:j :'•:.,:-••.:' ••'••'-::.'••:'14::'",•.'. .i•. •••.••• •' 4;::'-'',":::•;.- ' '1.'••:•'''!".,i''''''...',,''', -'• 41,, •
' ::',' ' ,''..::••l..., •:•.;!%':i.f...,.1',..:-.,:.;:•-•;,.,I,;',.-,,- ';.,,,:•.•:',.•:‘‘-','''''•-•1•,,.I;'I,"i''-',.',::.'','"..!:,:•••/!.-,:rt',.:,.'•';/1•,.,';.,''': .•:,;,,,I,','.i:'',:••,!'',.'''•,•••• '..::.;:f),-;.•..;',:,:.)•,.:(:::', '..; 4,, ••!".• ':';•,:f"•.‘,,,;.;...•;•;'.•-4.C',‘" It',-;-.;•"•• .." -'4:'•
• . •:.,,',...r.';';:,.;•;.....:.; '''::::••••••••;.:-. ',-,4...4,1-..','",.i....-;.:-.....;'..-.';','.. -;‘...:.,....!'f'.. '::,,•:‘. :'.....'s.',..T.':',..'''.;2,'.'-..,,;,••ik").•;',;',:i•s.,,"•:.•.•)),.•''.',•,':_ .•,"'i\`;'',/..',t:'..:•',!';''::',:z'7;`•,::." -:',..;','...t',:;,:',.....• .•:'••',;-•,•;...:',:'•;;.•,. -1,-.1.....',:,::t,.::•:'4'it'',..';,;',.1.Z,`,4!•,;-;,-:::•';';",,,,•'.'...,..,-7,,'
• . . :••.•. -.:',' :,••••", ,•-••'..,. ,•::;;'f''''"';••i'''••-•::';:`,•••.;:',•,::-.'••,;,:7-...;.:.,,':-.'",;:f,-$7'.•:-',. .;:ise,...f.;::.A,".i.......e..';'4,1:..;..re...,•‘',',.',.i'., :'-'•';',...,',•:,'•,.,,7';•:.:,..,i,,,•';',','.;.•:„",",'.••',','. • .-'',"'.•I••:.'.'.i•re•!;;',....,.•••i'':•;..i'Mr;',:-?',.';':,',..•';•‘:;•'.:'?1,'
''.. . •'';'..!,..'..,:;::::'.,;,'',.,..:,:•...'" ,,,,1,,,g.i'1.,:,....'•,... ,,,,i...':•:;:,,.-:?t.,;i'sf.,:,.::.:...,.,.,...;..;.::•rj:;..,:.,c,:•',1 ,':4;.•::t:. ,.:..,;f, ..:„.;',,..1,!::_,,,,:.;,.,,,.:,:;,.,:1,..%,::::;.:.:'.1.14.:.,•, , .,,,,,,..':::•••:•,:::'..;',.:!!!.,):;,::',•:;:::•;:•:;,,,,',',1,...:,,,,:::'":,;:li::::'.,..;....,;•'''•e:i:,..,::....1•:;;;i:;;;:.'::.,:.'1.....:•;••.,::::.....:::.:...'...:.,•.::::;;;,,,,.• . .;:.....:::::',,...L`•;;;'...,..,,c,....c.:(7,11..:;;'::::;'1,,,..,..t.c;: ',',..,(:',,,',1-'
' ',".••i•:. '.';":.'-'''' ::,:^I•',:.,,:' A '•',. • :'717,'.'et t....1• •,.,••••,••:-,,(•:i.i,..,•‘‘ ,. ,g•-r. ,:;,•'-1Z,..'Z.:::,•5: ,•`;:"?.:;V,'•''''-'+';'•:•':,;'•,; ,'-)',,,r,... :•:,47.-:for,,,''.,4•• ",•••••,•,•:•:',1,:""f,./.3','•;,r„.:'. :;,,,,4,-.•,,,::,-.:,,„'0 i.....i:•••_,,,;;A•
i...,f, ' -',-,:"':''''''..'..,:••,:•:!,..:‘,::-1,,•:.1,,!;.:,?..!:.•:il'i2,1;','';L,:':+4':‘,1.::F,'',.:!,:i".",417t. S!:::-1-•.•"•''‘.;:':',:.'.;'.k'•,4'::,..'•,.1',..,.:,..:'..4•:..1i,...' ..- ',,: c., ,I,.'4',' , •f;'....',Y.'...:.;:.,,-•::::.:::‘!;;;"..s,/,'ii.':,;;.,,:';`'.e,*'4,4'., ,'T.'•',,,z.,:;,:;',''..'.:.';',';•'..:•.V.;
''')1:''''''''CC*...&1'.' f.. .r..."''.,;`":7,'.:.:'''',','!-A'.:''':'''•,:. '''...t:;.•'-' '9.,''.:.'''.:!':.,,....•1.%,':.,•':>.,.'''.,,,•:::''':”•P.•.,i,:n;...1 1:.•.::,,,%... .:,:"P,',:.".•...:t'.'.•'?...It("•::':!.'..t:•;,t%•.1,'•:,•"•.:f'" ...":"•-';'`)..: ''.', .-';':;::',''',..•,'•
•" ''•; •'.:, • •'".•';•"--;/;.:: d, .s -••.• •:;;:,,.. .,:••:,..;:i',.';;;,'.,;.:',';;;:::',..,;'.:::1'.•il':`::.2...4:'..',...'.: '',.j'11;..'':•.1..'".6;•il.1•;',,,,•r:::."•:;;;::-.!.;'t4.::?.:,...':.••••::,;141 ...,',....t.t!,••••: .;.•,...,;,...,.•...,7....,....,,,r.....4., •••,...!•.......,4.‘.,.:/....,r...,P.,t.S;',''::: ;Llir••••;',.... .,y,
' ':' ''....7.'''''''''':'' •'. ...'`'' l.4•!, -Ci•':!-:'' •.)•:-•',. :e',..::':'":41.:•':'.1•••':',9,,•-''.•%••?!..J:':-',e.':i7;•:•-•••'•••:,•:.'.,•''....,..'.1.:•';••'•.::'.1.'".. ..!".A'.•••;••'..• .."i'.';':" il..7,.`:•.'•:::.%••''' '•• •I• ,''":".,';'..-r!r•-;:*",.,:4.•,'•''‘,•1:1),I:,•.e.f.'1•:,:',;'•(•:!:r)••.‘
' ''• '':,';''::-:'::.';'.:..‘.......:';':::11‘,•:'','i:•.j:-:'', ,,'•,:•:,, ,-•,-, :'::•',',,•':-;•:;•!.:°.''!1;.:i'.-[•:.•;"'',;''..;''';';.'•12:''11:"'•-•:::7. :.: ;i'•;.''.:'' .:.':'. ''...:;'; ‘ .' ...i.'....•.:••••••'., .:°:..',,..'..11:''P'•:,!t''...•'...;',!.1,j::•'';'.;.'''t'; ' •''-::::,1•:%:!-;'4.1'
'::. ,••-;:`,:;•;:1:•,.•:,...:',...:'i:.''',...•,.., ':-,;•••,:',.:'•:.:,.t;‘,..r. : c':::'T'••••••!;;;•';',',..?:-.,':•:7',,..•:;•••:;.;;;''''ii!.:::::',..,..::i'::-.!...:;"...•:,:;,;•,•••••:,:::''.1'i,,,;;'',.'i ..;-t ,.;•,•,...'•3,..;..,..-•;';',^1 \‘‘'... ..,;' ,;,,,;:•.,...';•'''.• S''''';',;',1•:.'•'.'ii-i:/'-,••',$•:;!ii..i.::-..-3','C•!..:•:•.!;:::'',..'•;;I:••ji‘'-',1?•'-',:•''''fi
' ' .'i,•',".,: ''','''',.......!i.:',.! •••';',•:!: .• :".•'.....-.:7:,.; • .•;',,•::::::: ::: .!'....;': : .''5:::"....i:- --•. '-'1:1,1c'''''''1 ''•1',;'•••••61';'...elit •••7.:':-::::"."1,r.111':44C1)--';::'4:;;:• ;<-. .;':' • •-•:''''<7. ''''::::,;.'c'.....'4...-',..;.''''..".1:;i;';,"::::'0::::,':".'•4:
; -. • •:••":". .••.•,•• ''t''::'•...t°,;:•(.4'..t-'•'..•.'.;•.2.'.. •.- ., ':::'.*.;'...•':'-'-',":',.•s':."•:. '.-,;•.,.cr;.•':':":,',.•:,:'-; ..... I t;:‘'il, ;• :ti• 'O, ,-, ,...-•• ,zit-:,-•,..-.,...-..-•‘•. : . : b:,Q••.. •..,••••..,•_•::.:::..1,..„,,,i4.'n4*,,•.'-',:-,• - "i,':',""•-•:'•:'••• - . '••r'...,•;,X".7..:•:,'2.'•,•,-7::;'...':-;•-:,,..;,-.••••';;;'•--•"•••:.;:.',:;7:,;;:,:i•:. ,.!;,-.•:•:,; .•.,..11••-fr, •?;f'- :4. f.-0 -. ;:\?, .-.:. . -...,,,,-i,,,,,..'..,,,:..... ,;:? • :-'•• - .,. .;, .,.., .,1",..:-!:':...f,,.,,::',...';.,.,.:,.,elt.,4,-.- ri',....
. ,-:-.-',.!....", -...........'..;.,.:;:s;:.-";-i.,„.':...,-,.,,. ,,.::,-...',..•...-.. - i;,,......: ,.. -..,,,::- ,•..:,.:..-..:.....- ,..: I. .;;..t, ::;',;.<-. -.,...•-•.•;.,.c):--".„›.-;:- •; ':••. .•'...•- ,...,i'...T'lk.•••••,..:,.,.-.1.,:,.. --;),:'-',,,.."••.•'.2c..s.,',•,:::-',;.t1,,,:,7s.
: •:.,., ..-:.:• .7....::•••,:',', •.'';,,•;.--....--T.,-.....-:-....., :7••.:::-, ,i,';,:‘,1-,P;) ''•::;24'-',,,''•;•,.: , •,-,-,•;.'.,••,`,;'-'....'•''r •:;.,. •.. . *.• ' •-,?;,:,-,,,,.1.,,.. . :::,,•• „.;tr; •, .„,.. .,.......•.::•,.f-•,• *.,,;•,f,•.:,. :•,'17,.',l'•1::'','"'"!4`:.,:q...-.:\..i''',.:':;?
. . ''''' .!::::.......41.';',':."‘...:',''''''''''':;:'•;::..::',1:.:.:::•.';'-'•;:''.;,:',';;;;;."';':':::.l.i....."-::; '..;:.1.';'.i,:'.1,' •''''':::.'::::''''.'1'::4":•;:..''''...;.;:::::'....;,;:,•::.•'''''..'.le, 1,'r‘...:''':,..;;;‘...;'*'ijs''' --./:;,....;:A4 '''''t'.1.;/54';'4'. ':. -A..:::::'-'';'•::::;11.:.•.:::....';'::: :i:::•1:;,,:r4i.:':..7.-i.:.':.•;.,.'is.'24:•'.‘,1'!..
. .:'.,'•„.,....•...,... ::•;....,''','''.',';;;•.':;...'•••.':.;‘-'.';',;... '':'. : . • .1 '4',;1:?: .:'- :•'.......''':''...:'-'''',..:.'...'•'.... ::;',"''..':: , i.t.44,;:rrt'.. •'.,.`.;,,,, .47-... :/,;,,AC,,,,P•' , ''''''' •, :::';'-:':-:.7•;':;;;„.••''.:',•••:.;.;•i.,..P.••';.;;;•,...,,'irii,',.;','11;:l?',•;:li.
•' • ' '''' ' '.'''' • •''.•..'.•:'''s'.'''',-''''''•1 ''',':':1 ';')..!:1 .,:::,'''''''..",'',::'ti.i,•••,. ''"r . ''!14 ''''....,' ,:. id4' "', '''' ..,':‘ ',. : .-, ' ' '''.-'. ;.:•'... ..,1 '•' ,:4':'':.,:l'i.''.?'.'“,.,,•' .''..:',,,,,y•:.,;,• .: ' ','.--. :'•-•/, ' ';,. .•'•. :,...—• ..-&,••_41 ...i.!,i s , ... ••• ' „,e,,,..;:1+!:,,,,,4i:,• ' ..'' ••(:,' .•(•'•,{'' '..• :.,...,......L....:-- ----,-;154-1-:' '.: '''',"I!....'• •0.• -,-- -c,',•.;,-•
• - '''..'.,•.,',...'•••' ".'•••' '•'''•:-..':.•,•••• ":' . -- )....;';i,'•,1, ,er, 1/4,-.. .....1`e.a;-_,,„ ,,;;;...,/,::;..)..:.',Cd'',:::::.7:I'0,$;%;',,,, ":-4... .".,:i:'.,f;_____,.`.•*--'''. ...::•:••::::;_.:4e..:''.:).•'•:.;',......l'O';•'','1.'.•'::',,'.4-,'‘j/,•`.1''''''1•,.
,7•4•:"•5.44,'''m;..••-•,,7-7F,i k,...? •,!.',..L.,; .;:(;•,:,••,•17-';',/,•' - - "••-:7,.,,'";, _,-7.__=:_;_.__......„.....•.T.,,,,:••,,• ,,•,;-,'..r,7,‘..':7;',.''.,':,!r.,i•!!.:.,„i'w
, '.-' . • ..;'.•••.:'':; ,'..., •:'''.•,:......';;;•.', ••• 2-7;'::f14-1',-T"-•• ••:•';',-,),•;;V; A?,,.•;.1".,2i..!;; ,,,k,J,i -,,,,••••--,0,4,---•,:,.,,fir-- •:. ,,,,,, --1 4,,,;, *777,,,.. :..• , •,,.,.,:-,...:.;, „..-.'4,.i:-...v.•'',•-•`••-•!'-':,..4••:,;:•:'.,,:,•:•,-':c,.-i'4.
: • ••• -•:' .. ‘•••••:. •' .;.•• .-.;,-4.--•-•-E.,4:2.2•2•• _'''.---f'-':4---,...'‘• •If--. ,,_„.,, ,i,.,,,,,.--..:,• ,;--- ,,,4;v.:. . . -•;;,'i ..4' ;•'',:-;.•..'.:;:!..•,";-.....z.;,:1'.....:.::',..,-;:::••‘,.. ...-;;.':-..Z•.,';'.•••';''...'`,:,•,_',c,'!„',*:'•••r.,.i' • •''.': ••• •;" '.'-:.' ' .. ' --'• 7 '•-• ''','1 ,,,F;•eir ', •...- ----,• ., • ., •• .1 r,,,' - -•,.., •••.. • •\ •-•-•".:-.... • -. •••••.:,','.!•,;,..it....,.. .,.:.2•.,...„-•,-,..,:•••,,-?...,:....,,,,..:,(i.,,:,
• - ••.• • •-• '•• ' - •• ,•', - - - . .i./,',1',, - •-• •'•• • ----:. -. • '•'' -•,,-. ''..' '• ...-....-........,,..- ',': •••:•),..:',..- •:-.. 1..,:,--:-.-.,';:,::.';',:t v..-..i'...";•••"':•';":-.14•••-i. .,..•-•:P.Y.••;
•, . •,.. . ...........„::•:........ ...•:•:: ,•:..... f. .......04..:„:„•••„4,•,t.,•,•• „,,..„.......i. •:; •._.. .__,. . • ,; .., ..., . .• ., •,.. ,. ...,..: 1,,, ,•. ..,,•• ,. .• • ..,:::::,,,...,„;•,,,.„....:::,,...,:.:,•:..;.:•,:.:..•:,...,,,„.,,•:.•...,2„.....•••,....:
i
..•,." .:•. : -..:::• .,• ••••••:H .• • -•42.-;, •:• ••• • ,,,..,.,4,-• :.,;.......,:••••••::::• ,• • :-/- 4. ,'.e'' . '.'•;•:: .'..: .."-, •• -,4' '. - ,:. .: - .....,,,:..,:-„.,-.iv.,.:.,•:-....:,.',..,!-:,:„.,.:-.:,....',,,,,..--!-iit.,
• -.•':•••,,,..,..••: ' • ....„‘",;',,•••• •;t: .,.•'.-••••: .....: .! ...... '1,.ei.,,Z., ''...'•.;,;•..;,.....-: , ,: . ,•:-,..•• 1, ,:.,;;,, . . . . • . . ;...'••••,.,........:.•,:',- . .,.,:'.. .. i ' •:•,‘,..„.:-, •,,,,..:;,,,.,;::....:.:.,.„;',:....:,:„.•,...... ,...,•••,',..,' •',i;.•,''.:`.1.'.:',.::!....'1
I
. -. '.'':;:....'.: '-' . ' • ,--i, r_,T) 12,d ••-#. e:.,.:.......-. • . ,-....:•' ,... .4 •• ,....: • s ' . ..:,: . .."..:..t.P .. .... . ,-.,........,, :_,.:;.:,,,..;_;:-.t,-......,,•:::-,...,.,.., ,-,..„,-...,-.i,,,,...,_,
7.-.,...-Fp.,Lirc.,..,. . , .
:-:::'..!... .....: .‘TA., -., ':•' • : ‘;•,14 . ••:•-••• '• 4''', ". .1:1, „, ''.•:- : '''-.•- •••:. 2 -„,, .. ..• ,. •: „.•.:,:.,i -.2 4,.•,...,,.. , 44,,:-,:„..4i,.!....y.,-,,p.„-.,,,.7f.•;,.:4=.,,,,-.
.,, • '4,, .4,4... .. ,.,•..„.1,•, . :--....• . . ,. . .-. . !‘,-d:•4 •'.. .,,,.•'.:: ,• Le ; ;;.'`P'.,;!;;'..• 1...• • ..,;;' •; • ' '; ; .'1, I..;....;; '- ,:i.•',• f,j'.•'...!:•..•i•;,•:-4,;b:e•-',,';':,•,Z,„'...i,:,:;:;;;;;:;;,:''."42`i:::::2.;)*:$
(
. • ,:...;,:•:.,:• -..,:,,• -,'.,,',...,-.'„':,.". , '•:. •"'•'. - • "• :' 1\;•t.;0• l• ';-• ..,:•;"'• ' • r . '' ' ''.. .1i c ." %' •''. .'' ' - i c' ' ' '....:,.'.'.'',,,,':',..;•.:,„`..;.'.'''., .:',...;1-;•;...':';',..''.:,i.'•:•.r,',P.:,•,',.4.;:c..:',i,':;
-..,. ...''.':. s. '''......., ,.. --, -,. • . . - i'::::li'S i:';''',:'. .,' '., ' ;.!:).. .. '" ...... ::„.. -. , '.. c, ' -.%,,,,,.,.. ..! ... .:,',....,...;.,*:?:'.:.•,‘'..';i. .t.',::-.".'"?....:::,,,,, ;::.;:47.•••.4,4;-,.. .,1?1.,',:::;:i:..,
, :.:.:',. .....". '.:::•.:.:.<!-.........'.;:.•:''''.;. ,'. --...: '11,1.1,:' . ;••• -...'....,' .• ,;, ..,: :.Pi• .' V4 . . .- .: .'• . • :. :t.;",. .;,... .• ' .• ' ",.....':..7,i,•':-:......... .:::,:.;.-...i•••,...:•'•::f..3.!,..;'d•t''.; 'i',
. :: ,,,:.,.,•r•,•,' ,:;.-;:•.:.',,..•••;',•••2:••1.. •... ' ,:... •:;....,,.,..:'., -,..,,;.,...... ....:,.....-.,.;,......'..:......._. +......4.,ry,._.____400 .—,..,,-r,„'-•••.„ --g- .2;),:,'..:-&t,t,-5,; .,..'••
,' TT447 .' c' '..:'.. .:.,•;•:'•,•..'''-.'.'"'.....t:.;;-:',;..,1,'::•:•..1'''7;'...,,:' ''•:';t',;.:•,.;.:...(•;?:41'.',;:•1'':',i'l ki!';;i,•,.'.e•,,t4•('•',t;'1.'.'-4..C,A.A: '''.C•,',.
I
;., • .•I,•• • .• ' .r.;;;A:.• ' .•:'' ,.. ;:,,:••7.:41C'b',.'.'oc.,,,r,1?'„1,;,,)!
' " .., '• : ':...Ai...'''''.''''' 1 ' VK"''Z'-:7"-...+Y,;5 'r,7;::?,,W,A77,,r:t''. ..."1.','..,.';'.4...17.4.i'::.!.:4',Vi' 1 " ..r14, -;;'"''''''''-'. '7 . ';',, ' ' '''.. '',-,'r"--''''('N'''',-,'•' ' ',' 1',43 r ''''''f'''4''
''. . ' ''"''''::'':''''''''..'''':';?'.'..:'' .7'''..**''''''.'''''''''e'•e"4", ''.','"-‘.''''-' ''''" ''' .' i • Iiir —.-- — -r--,L., .,‘• . ,, :, - ,•,,.,.......‘,,,,,••,.; ::,,'•';‘ ' /,,::•‘"•••:C:''Ili!' I.,'
1,19-11,•' ' ' •M:'•',
. •• : ' '"'''.:'•''''' '• ... '"' r''"' '‘.•:' ' '' '. :" '. t''`''' ''' '. .•• . . 7, ; Ki7 • • '.•'-'•;,;T. ;---• •'• - '•.' 10.• : •N „-•,.-.:, ,-,r,:i;...;:- ,•-,.i..,..,••.,•-•-;•-,•:.., $•••,!,.,i,..:.„,•••.k.•;,
, : :,,• .:.;•.,•4,.... .. ... ;.•-:-';4.,,',.:.'i-•.4....•.., -•:'-:-..42:„.:.4 .4 44 ,.••'.•,,,,,.,..r•-•,- •4,:- 4 . ' t,4 .. ......."•-4. ,•'••••1‘ -•:.::• '• ',' , i,.;•:..•!:•,•'''••:.;...-...:••••;:',,;.• ':'.. -.:::::•.'.':.'',..',:-.2,',:::'.,A.,-,;,,14;?1`,./..•,:i.'.,t,'",,,,'''':..i,„: •• , ' '',.',...,''•:,..:.'•.•'.:•.• •..'•.•::....'.:::.::,..•4'.:.- • ;"..-..1.,'....,4 ......:,..? .!''1, -.r.:':::-.,',,,,,....,,.. l',, • f,,,.. ,'., '•1'.4 .,;A: ......,',,,.:.,:..,..;,:,.,,,:....i:-,..,,,,'; -. •,•-.,4.,.....:•..:....,::::,:,......,'., :,,,•,..,,,,. ...!..,,,...•.,.,f,...,•,,,f,,:,....,.F.,..,,,-•?,•,-:-,1,,,iil, ,•,••;,...,,,!,,....., ,..1-,,,!--,...t.,,,,,,,,..,,,
' .,'.,- .„,•••••:,'..,. ',.-.'. -,:......,..'....••••':•.;•-.'••,.:-..::.' •.-,.., ...•••4 • ....-4 ,tii -e.. ,:,...:::',•- f f. ,..,...A. .:3',.,1). la/....,::.:.•:.,.l',;;.' ',.2'.'. .::. ',3:.."i,-?•t; Li! . !`:::•••••; .:::-.... '),•;.,.•:::•;.','..-?•'..,:••,1::•••':;.:;";•'!....';;::".;';:•••;:il.:d ‘:•'4'"!:•4;:i'
- •.;.'",;. ":f ',:•1.-„:.•,':,.:', '-...i '•..•' ,-.•:s., l''7, '......• . :••,‘ .'•'....••:..,:-.;,,, J:f. • '• ,••.1,!...-,•...... :; : •, •• . #i'i':: ..a. :;:•••,..-..••'':.., ',"''I.:::'• ::.7.!': 4/"A :: ,'f:':••,,.-•.:F' ...!.;::4',•:.'•;V::;':•,':::::,..,...);(•.' ';:d;';'',t.,;:i:.";',:;:•..,.'0,4•bdiS'
'.'::. .:• 1:-•:::'•';'.":•;;'..;''.'•••;".'.:-•:,•::::•.'••••••'::.'..;.:.::':;•.:'''...".•: ••:•,'"; .'.:• I. 114 '.::::::-:;'..'.'.•• ".t: i ,•:':-....`‘,4 t,L) ....: •••'..,--f •.4; - .. .1%)?. 9 ''...., -.:. ',.... ..,.,:-,-.•:'.-....'4,,:::.:':••••,...',..:•.....-,i;',.•,• :42.v..•,,•,••• ,•'1,..:•T.,,,d
'. ...-...• '4:•:'.4 .',:.••:,..•:•- :.' --,.-,.,••;!:,i•-••t:.'-'.:.::••':',..: : . .:.2,. q.„i f....,..:'..••: .....-:.. , .. ..et' ,d‘ ,',....•''''.':-','..:•''•;'...,''-',i''.;', ,. .L'• .. - -.....,..' •-•-...._ ;'•,:••;:;'• •:?,.:'-,•:!!''.:‘...,';':),..`,''''''i);.'?..,51f2,'/F
' '.. .. ' ,..,...IL:."1.,';'....:, ":'.., :,;,,,,'-..-..:'....;.•:;,.''...:.:..:•.-..:•:',.•-•• '• .--1 .it.'il; l''....-....._•:'.'..,- - •'.6* P- ..',,' -,I.....d - •- - ' ,• ••,.....1 .,••It' ••...,• ,, ,.•,., ,...-..,:.......,i;.....'.,..,.:.y.,3,:.,5,414,,.,,,-...,:- c.,,
., ., . , ...t,,, , ,...., ..• , . ,,• ,.. ,• ,..._,..,,...,„,• ..., s '. . • , ,.•-•.'. ,-..,,,.;:•!'....,. .•:%.,,...,,.A... ;,•••;,,:b.,.,,,,,..,, ,--
':. : . •-••-•••• :, -,:,,.•.,‘............'.• :..-•:2'...;,.:... •',....-.•••.• • . •:.... ,:q: :.:••,•,...,:., „.• •I, .''.,,::) .,.•:•:,:0.. •••s-. ..::.•,. ,„..wf;:,::?.!.....6 ,.. . ., .. ....• .....:.,...:::...;,.......,•:,..:.:.......i ..,,......:. :•;,t..4,,•,:•.i .::::.„,c2;.
. . ...:,, ,,, ..,..„.......,..„ . •,. . • •,,..,.......,•,....:„ ., .„,..,•,...„....-,,,;•;•..,;,,.,;:f.,,,, _6:,,,,.
. . ...;•;::::2:,::,,........ :,...,, ,.:,•-,;„....0...,1:.,. ..,...,,,.;,......:..,.,,, .....:,.., :,.;,•tile• •••,..,,,,..,...•; ,.y.,.. .„(,,„ 1•4,...•• - .., ,.. . . , ., ... r:.• ,. . •••.. • ,7't ' . •'-,' ':••?••:::'' —-• .,1, ?.'‘%, ,, •f Vt ,
' :,,,' • '''::•, :.:::,..•;••: :::•,!:"',.r.:,; :•'...:1:•:"': ": •''•:,''''•-:•.:',..":'., ...Y..i''•.;::::•.:,',; :••(r.e.. .•':'*1-••.. 4 ':/: ../,'''e.; :.•,:,:-1:'...,i•. ••••.-•,;1.;,.'::,..".:.•;....::•;::4?;.••L'''.',..•'d•1,..l.„..;,:'" -. .=..... .:.::t.:i•';',,Y.•••.,'..•;.';;',.'!",''..;'4:;.`",:',;•;;,r,"/••:•:U;;:,' ,1'.''',.:.";''
' '' ,..:*•;-.:',.... '•,', •.:'".; ::::-..'..:..:.::.•':,•:-.,-•:,•••••:;•.--.: ::.•'•-,•:.:'..-."‘;.;":".:•;.'";:-A:. ',..''';'....:• ;ii.* :,i4 ':;'....;1...:. 1...??:.:::.•'::•' ...:I.,...." .'. ....-•,•::.•.•...;.;.,t.•.'•"..:•::,:--1" : : ••.;•.•,•'-•':•:',1;1...;•,.'.'•:,:;•:•`:ft!,,:',..'.'• .!.'.'*::.:yi".tlin,'.1kC•'i
•_ :..,'........i,•;,•,•':'•-•,... ...:•,.;..::;;;"'.•:';'....'.....i.:"....':.:',.',..1,".2,:,...•...‘,...';:s.•:-..":::•,..''',•:. ,..,:•••":J•";:' ,.‘•.,°!•••••••:......: . .;! ..":.•'; ::).•;,...,:/..1.•.d,..'-',.•••;•,':•••••::.;::"... ...,::',...,..-,,''. '‘'......,‘,..,..!r-',.:.;1,,:•;..,:;:'••--,..,•:•,:::,:.c.-:;;;C:. :':',!::...:',..:;•',•i::.`•,. ..•:,: ."'•!•:;`,Ii:',••; ::: ..',.4...,,-;!,y.",..,,:.;
-. . •••• '-''''''..' ....-••••'''.....".••••' ''''..•'....r.I' ' ' .1"..'•-' ''''''''' ''..--'" .. •'-:.:-.••,:'••••:',1'..- ',...i.,:.,•,•:;',.;.-.*.,\.;...-`•:;,"•:iit./.-::"'•:1.,';',.,!,:',..': '..4:-...:1....-•:-..'.......':',.,...':.4t:•, ,:!.:q.';':•i_1,,,.... i,"•,..,p?,:!i:!2'.N,5i.e,,..,
• .• • ...--•-•-•''...••• • .- •: •,-.•:....,....., •.-,..,....,-;.,... .: ... -:•:.:,:;',...";.•;,-''..'1'.:;•••••••." •••;•%:.:1.•',.. .••.•.•:.,'''.'-'•.•'•••'.':. :;''•-• •••t•fq-::::,...-..',...!. '.'...' 1,',1.-•'•''','..t.:"..".. • , ' ••••••;.:,;:'•:::•1,;',.,'''....4',...,l't+'''•;;,..1,1':1;'•:,:•L');',1,'„;',1
. •' ,:',•:,::/. ..--.. , ..•:.•:,,f,,c...,.•,, • ',---.-:--.••••'...-....., ',,••.;.,•-:,,,-,i,',...:-.1.- :'..:, •.....i.:: 1 ,•;,•,...,,i..„...i.,...•4.::.,',..,,;'.r;:,;,•,:.•;.';•".:'• .:: -'•••,• •-••'.. ;... 't.• d:-,;.,•;:,,..:2.:',: ••,'-.':', ,..,',,';:•'4:''' %1'f;'''.',''.';''....:
. . ' ...•'..",,• ''':i .•''.-...,":','.:, -.'''-'......;•:1:,1.'.'''''''''. •,‘''.'..'....??.*7::.:''.: ''.'..'::.• .1.' ...,:' '',:tit.,:'.• •...1.•.'f .wt:61.•k .0...K‘,2_-,-..,.,.-•--.,..._ .:.:),.;.:.-.• ,.v.;•,,;„:°.,-i-.•-•,:ii..,,,...i;;,••,;4e14-,,,,,,-.•:4,;; i,
',. 4 .•::‘:4:,i,4.4,....:'•,,•4 4 " f.•. -4.4.'.1.‘';'',•,--4•;•:4 .-r.:-::..-.4--•-: -.--..•'-'..• ...f,......,.,2,•; ':.;4:•' V.f.‘;'.z.P,',4,,•. :.4..-.;
.• • • . ..:."';4 4:'''....;",•• '...'.. '','',....-4,'-.-....:4::-•-,'''(-...-:..','..s-:• . .::••'t4'•'`,,;",•-:-••`'...,, ."....• ,L.,'" .,,..;':.:-.•:•,,.,-r,.-6....:::.,-,..,.,:- A' 4-.. .•'.-..-'4,:'9•-•1•'':. ..'•:••''''''''".;:::•'.:• ..':!•9;','''','•4;;•.--:1L4:,,:ti',';',' .Y,$"'•.;
•- . '.4,...!'. --4::-:,::4:.": .'.,::'..'.• ,-'4•'...........••••':4:•,.:,'Y..: -..•-,-,-,- s, ILI4,,....f\/.E.- 7.1..'••?•,1„;,,:---;:,',,,•!:,•, ..,...i.;',.. ..-.; ,•:.•-..;,- ,.;;,.....,.,.•:.•;:, .:-''•,:, ,.-;.,.:•:'4,,•;4,......:,;:f.. .'•:::;,-.,'•'.:,..,..4,-„.,,,,::•,.1.4,, ,..,. .\!,,,,.,14.,•,t,,.1p,,,t,,..• .. : •, ,.• •.•.4;„'..••„ ,.•:.•:.744,7;.-........,:..,,,,,..,...,.4: .•.,.•...--:,-7- .,, ;• ,,.., .::•,..-,: ,•-•;•••---.,.::.•4 ,,•,4,..,,,,,,•'1,':1:j:'.:. "..:.'.',..'''!.•,,,),::..,,.':.',,'..... I.:',.. ',.4.'i.:',.....,:R.r...r.'' ,:,,I:,.,';::••:...:•:,. .;•(%:il...: 7'z'AfdPitt;•;:!:ill.iZ'd'•';!,"!,1.,V,"12
:. ::.• •• '.';• .': '-.::'':'•. .: :;• '..••••:';:. . •:........••:1. - ••••''•:,...!'..'.,'';.'" '...:r;'.;,•, •.•..6 :' :',,,•.1..-,H'•"... .141-;°Cs$N,,.4••:.:.s......../.;•„i'•:1•'..,:::i.•,...;: 4;:'•'" r•''-'.1'
. '''''':'':',":••.:'''';'.2.:'..;!t.:""i: .r';;;';'''S'7;:ti'llt:1'ti:'''''i''''kt;:::.
. ••:.' .,:...t...;:•••:'": . ;'..•: • •:•.:...,',:.:.;'.:''''':::•••,'•.•::•,.' "...::-.•:::,....'.:,,..',.."—.•irr73,-;1:- ;
.'7- ".,::::‘,'r7. . 7.. ..,! : .,...",.'• •-••••,•••••••'......... ,•,4.-....•,:••tr•' ..A!•••••,'.•.,;.:,,..,:•. 4.',',,...:,'.i.N..,,...„'.i,,t,;... ;'..:°,:4:•,.4,•.,,L;.";
. :- ..,;.....,......;.,.•,.....,,•.....,:.;.,...,:::;•.:.......:::.•.....:NA.;.....;...:••••......!.•..."(_'....,1..3.1.',.',•r''.....,: '''t'',!..`:4 ' '.'''';.•'•...,„ . i " .. • .. .i.".•••,••••••'..'":".i.t;f:,)e;)
,'•::,!‘•:';.',., .'',,,,...'•;':', •:;f",-•.'•.!...'';',..j,l,f4.14;',1.1.i:r,ci":"'P..F.,;,'•.."'''.vi
:•:.- • .'•': .."•.•"'::".•.::: ;. t.'•:'.•:: '..-•',';': "••• :;;•. .-... •..:1":•.•••••••;.'::::H.'-•v•"•'.'f'' :' '''''•.-::• '''.;1;?••' -, .;-.'f':•!':•''' -t''''It....',...',-.;.' P•:'',.... I . 1','!::•:1',;':1%.:1.'1•::: •';',',1.1:::i:;;;;:'.."''0;:-1; .p.•1.:;'„..',,,i.i.' * ,••• :•:''..';.::•1"::'•`...;:....:.,•[•• ',.!....:.:,•-•• ' •:•• :.'• ;."•,...',..:::::: '..... ••''''.•:/•::;: ''•-•:.:.•.:. ";c-:...-'' !.... :iz•', , . •••• '...::',':',1.:::;:......', 2:".-•:•.-••••;',‘-. .'.'i ..: • ,i‘.:•' '• • ..7-7'fj;•'•/'!..:l''''.,••;:';'.....,'.4‘.‘•°;ii ' %eliil,'Y`•;•!..,••`:
--': '.. .' •;''..;',1?:'.:.:...'.•_.','::'•-•T '''',-•--.: '• i:••••,•:.;:•";•.•••7;,'..•''.., .,:.;,''.•,,;.,.i;.1;;,..i.,• ,,,.; .' it,,t,.• • ! .,,,.s,••,.'1 r., •,:1.•.•.'....„•.•.,!!':i•i.',.':.•::,•.'''.'-f'''.6'...'1,i'.';'.. ,:t:'.',....';••••.•:;.ii,''', :1•,1,.''T,S.,:',.1:1::14.,741:loZ;etikV_;11
REC
Ci .00 ,RE oN
2'�{eF'.° IPIG' EXAMINER
Juts 2'.O 1978 pm
1 AM
'7,8o9eld9.11A1 i2t3s4►5rfi 1 .. ,
2 �
� 1
O. - •
3 ITEM, NO. — l 7-
5 IN' PROCEEDINGS BEFORE L. RICK. BEELER, HEARING EXAMINER
6 In Re.. )
• ) ' File No. R-178-78
7 CITY OF RENTON REZONE )
8 APPLICATION ) MEMORANDUM BY .. Nw.�ToEvit`GL-L'.o nMuostrU.AS Soc(AZ7 oNL._ l,4
9 ) UP..P_.ORTZAW THE CITY OF
RENTON' S APPLICATION FOR
10 ) REZONE FROM R-3 'to R-1
• 11 THE RENTON HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION respectfully submits
12 the following memorandum in support of the 'application of the
13 City of Renton to downzone certain properties located on Renton
14 Hill.
15 . MEMORANDUM OF AUTHORITIES
16 I . ' AMENDMENT OF ZONING' REGULATIONS' -"STANDARDS .
17 ARBI.TRARY' '&' .CAPRICIOUS CONDUCT/APPEARNESS OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.
18 The Transamerica Development Company ( ".TADCO") has challenged
19 the .actions taken' by the' City of' Renton Planning Commission and'
20 City Council •in changing the Comprehensive Plan as being violative
21 of the "Appearness of Fairness" Doctrine and constituting arbi-
22 trary and capricious conduct by the City. While those issues are
23 not now before the Hearing Examiner for review, .the issue has• •
24 been raised and some response is warranted.
25 The City of Renton has the discretionary power to enact such'
26 zoning regulations as it deems appropriate 'to govern or regulate
27 the .growth and development of this city. As a general •proposition
28 the enactment of a zoning ordinance by a city council is a dis-
29 'cretion'ary exercise 'of police power by the legislative authority
30 of a city and will not be reviewed by the Courts except for a
31 manifest abuse of such, discretion, usually characterized as
32 "arbitrary and capricious" conduct. Usually numerous decisions
Memo. by Renton Hil] Community
y. , GOUGE. MQBETH & FAULL
Association in:-Support' of _City:' P. O. BOX 213
RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055
of -Renton Applicationfor Rezone AL 5-5500
Page 1
•
•
1' have• been delivered 'byOur- Courts, in which the arbitrary .and , •
2 capricious standard' has, been dismissed'. P
3 A concise statement of the law: ,concerning• a challenge to a
•".4' zoning .action ;taken by a; municipality was_ given';in. State ex rel
' 5 Myhre v. City'. Of, Spokane, , 70 .Wn 2'd., 207 , 210, 422 'P. - 2d 270 (1967) •
6 as follows :
7 " (1) Zoning is ',a discretionary ,exercise of, police . .
•
power: by a legislative authority. Lillions..v. Gibbs ; 4:7 Wn. •
• 8 2d 26:9 , 289 P. .2d. 203' (1955) ,Courts will' not review, ex
cept:, for manifest.'.abuse;. the exercise of legislative. d'is P
9 cretion. State ex rel.: Smilanich v.'' McCollum, `62 Wri. 2d
: 602 ; •384 P. 2d 358 (1963) Manifest abuse of- discretion
10: involves' arbitrary' and capricious ' conduct, Such :conduct.
is defined to be without consideration. and in disregard
11, of the., facts:, . State ex rel. 'LopezPacheco v.' Jones, 66 Wn. •.2d
199 , 401 p. ,`2d 841 . (1965) State "ex rel.;•'Cosmopolis Consols
12 School Dist. No; 99 v: Bruno, 61` Wn. 2d 4611 .
378 >P: ,2d.- 691.. (1963) . ' , One 'who -asserts. 'that a public
13. ;authority: has• abused its discretion and is guilty of arbi
• trary,, capricious, and unreasoning conduct has the burden,
.14 of proof :State .ex .rel. Lopez-Pacheco v: Jones ,'. supra,
State' 'ex' rel. Longview• Fire: Fighters Union;: Local 828 , vs:.
Longview, .65 Wn,. 2d 568 ,,: 399 P. 2d 1 (1965). . If the- validity•
'of the legislative' authority' s classification for zoning ,
1:6 P P fairly ur �oses'"is,' : ,debatable'' it will be ,sustained'.
Euclid v: Amb'le'r',' Re;al•tyCo;: ; 272. U.S .: .365 , 71 L. Ed. 303 ,
17 47 'Sup. :pt. 114-;. '54-. A.L.R'.'-:1016 (1926) .
18 • In •.S.harn_inghouse „v, /C=ity of Bellingham, 4 Wn. App. 19.8 , 201
• •
19 480: P. 2d 233 (1971)';. the Court discussed the arbitrary ,and •
20 capricious• standard ;as follows
21 "Arbitrary and capricious : action of administrative bodies
22 means: r willful and uneasoning action, '.without consideration
and in disregard' of facts or circumstances Where there is.
23' room for two opinions , . action is not arbitrary or capricious ,
when exercised. honestly and upon ..due consideration, even ,
24, though• it:may be believed that ;an erroneous conclusion, •
has been reached, In re Buffelen Lbr. & Mfg. ' Co.. , 32 Wn.
25 • ;(2d) 205 ; 208 ,- 201 P . (2d) 194 (1948) , and case cited:
•
• •26, Accord, State' ex rel. Myhre v. .Spokane , supra;. Burnham v.
• - Board :of Appeals of Gloucester, 333' Mass : : 114 , , 128 N.E. 2d
27• '722 (19'55)
•
•
28 In addition to the. arbitrary,.and capricious standard discussed
. 29 •
above ,. the City must also satisfy an: ".appearness of •fairness
30. standard which also''has been discussed in numerous.'Court decisions.
31 In ';West Sloe community, Council v.. Cityof Tacoma' ' 18 Wn. A
. .. Slope Y' ,' pP� • '.
328; • 335 .(1977). The Court discuss:ed the appearness of doctrine
ti `
. Memo.. bys,Renton -FI111__Coinm. Ass GOUGE, McBETH &FAULL
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ,
;Page.'2 AL 5-5600 ,
is
•
1' as follows:
2 'The appearance of fairness doctrine, which has been
3 developed to assure the highest public confidence in
the governmental processes which result in zoning
4 changes and, land planning• measures , is invoked to
invalidate- a decision when a member of the deciding
5 body has an interest which might have substantially
influenced his individual vote even if that. interest
6 did not actually affect him. Narrowsview Preservation
Assn. •v.': Tacoma, 84 Wn. 2d 416 , 526, P. 2d 897 . (1974) .
7 The appropriate test is whether a
g disinterested person, having been apprised of
the' totality of a board member's personal in-
9 terest in a matter being acted upon, [would] be
reasonably justified in thinking that partiality
10 may 'exist?'
11 Swift v. Island County, 87 Wn. 2d 348 , 361, 552 P. 2d
175 (1976) . See also Buell v. 'Bremerton,' 80 Wn. 2d
' 12 518 , 495 P. 2d. 1358'' .(1972) ; see generally 1, R. .Anderson,
American Law of Zoning, §§ 4 . 18-4 .20 (2d ed. 197.6.) ;
13 Annot. , 10 A.L.R. 3d 694 (1966) . ' '
14 In that case, the appearness of fairness issue arose when
15 City Councilman Warnick voted to approve the rezone request.
16 Councilman Warnick owned Puget Sound. Manufacturing Company, a
17 cabinet, making business , which'' had 'on occasion done work for a
18 general contractor who had done work for the developer on competi-
19 tive bid. The Court held. that this potential conflict of interest
20 was too remote to violate the appearness of fairness doctrine.
21 In SAVE v. City of Bothell, 89 Wn 2d 862 (1978) , the Court
22 was asked to overturn a rezone approval in which two persons
23 closely connected, with the. Bothell Chamber of Commerce, an active
24 participant in the •'rezone hearings, participated in the Planning
25 Commission hearings and voted on the rezone. The Court held that
26 the participation of the two individuals , one the executive
27 director of the Chamber, and the other a member of the Chamber
28. Board of:Directors , 'violated the appearness of fairness. doctrine,
29 ,stating as, follows :,
30 , The test to be applied was stated in , Swift• v. Island County, ,
31 87'.Wn. .2d 348, 552 P. 2d .175 (1976) . '
Memo. by ',Renton Hill Comm:. Assn
etc. ,
GOUGE. MCBETH & FAULL
Page 3'. ' . ' • P. O. BOX 26
RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055
AL 5-5600
•
1 The question to be asked is this : Would a disinterested
2 person, having been apprised of the' totality. of .a
board member 's personal interest in a matter being
3 acted upon, be reasonably justified in thinking that
partiality may exist? If answered in the affirmative,
a such' deliberations , , and any course of conduct reached
thereon, should be voided. ,
5 ,Swift v. Island County, supra at 361. We find that adisin-
6 terested observer would be justified in thinking partiality might
exist.
8 Under the standards set forth. in ' these cases , we do not feel
9 that the City. of Renton would be acting, in an arbitrary or capri-
10 'cious manner if this rezone were approved or that the appearness
11 of fairness' doctrine has in any way been violated by any pro-
l2
ceedings that have occurred to date. ., .
.13
14 II. SPOT ZONING.
15 TADCO has also alleged that this rezone application, if
16 approved, would 'constitute illegal spot zoning. That issue has
17 been before the Court many: times . In an oft-cited case, 'Smith v.
18 Skagit County, 75 Wn. 2d 715 , 743-45 (1969) is illustrative of
19 these cases . In Smith, Skagit County' approved. the rezone of 470'
20 acres of land on Guemes` Island from residential zoning to heavy
21 industry. The Court discussed the problem of spot zoning at
22 length, stating ,as follows : .
23 Along with the failure to conduct the public hearings
24 fairly, both in substance and, appearance,' we are convinced
,that the rezoning constitutes a flagrant case of illegal
25 spot zoning. Spot zoning has come to mean arbitrary and
unreasonable zoning action by which a smaller area is
26 singled out of. a larger area or district and specially
zoned ,for. a use classification totally different from
27 and inconsistent with the classification of surrounding
land, and not in .accordance with the comprehensive plan.
28 Spot zoning is a- zoning for private gain designed to
favor or benefit a particular individual or group and
29 not the welfare of the community as a whole. See C. Rhyne,
Municipal Law '§32-3 , at 825 (1957) . The vice of a spot
30 zone 'is ' its 'inevitable effect of granting a discrimina-
tory benefit to one or a group of owners and to the detri-
31 ment of their neighbors or the community without adequate
public advantage or justification. Thomas v. Town of
32 Bedford, 11 N.Y. 2d 428 , 18.4 N.E. 2d 285 ' (1962,) . Zoning
merely for the benefit of one or a few; or for the
Memo. by Ren,.ton_,Hill Comm:=Ass 'n GOUGE. McBETH & FAULL
etc. , _ P. O. BOX 26
Page 4- RENTON• WASHINGTON 98055
AL 5-5600
r .
1_ disadvantage of 'some and' with no substantial relationship
2 to the public health, safety, general welfare or morals ,
in .con.,flict with either the comprehensive zoning plan .
•
. 3 or' ordinance 'is arbitrary and capricious and unlawful.
Eckes 'v: Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore Cy. , 209
•
4 Md. 432 , 121 'A. 2d 249 (1956) .
Therefore, it is univerally held that a spot zoning
5 ' ordinance which singles out. a parcel of land within the
. - limits of a use district, and marks it off into a'
6 separate district for the benefit of the owner; and per-
' .mits the use .of that parcel inconsistent with: the use
•
7 allowed in :the rest of the district; is invalid if it is
• not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and is
8 merely for 'private 'gain. Cassel' v.' Mayor '&' City Council
of Baltimore, 195 Md. 348 , 73 A. 2d 486 (1950) .
9 The foregoing principles , it appears , forbid this amendment
10 to the zoning resolution and reveal it as an illegal spot .
zoning. 'Since 'size of the rezoned area must be considered
11 in ,relation to the si.ze , of the whole district affected
• (Mathis v. Hannan, supra) , we must' relate the approximately .
•
12 470 acres zoned for heavy industry to the entire island •
•
of about 5 ,500 acres zoned residential-recreational'. When,
13 with no change whatever in circumstances and conditions ,
and after about 5 years 'of intensive study and numerous
14 hearings , Guemes had been zoned residential-recreational',
the aluminum company 's undertaking to buy the property
15 .for the site of .its reduction plant constituted no change
of conditions adequate in, law to support the rezoning.
•
j . 16 With an abundance of sites still available in areas zoned
' industrial, , the fact that the aluminum company preferred .
' 17 Guemes Island to all others and insisted upon having' it '
shows that the rezoning under attack here .was for the
18 . peculiar benefit of the aluminum company, and detrimental
to the neighboring owners and the general welfare., To meet
19 'the company's demands , , we think, was unreasonable, arbi-
trary and capricious , and, therefore, illegal .
20 • , , These standards were approved in Buell-v.' City. of Bremerton,
21 80 Wn. 2d' 518 (1972).'. Under these standards , this rezone can-
22
not be considered an illegal "spot zoning" . The size' of the
23
rezone area must be considered' in relation to the size 'of • the
• 24 .
whole district affected. The total area affected by this applica-
. 25
tion is Renton Hill,' and only Renton Hill. Within that area,
26
the subject property is not unduly singled out and restricted
27 ' .
in use as compared to other uses permitted on Renton Hill. TADCO
28 v .
has attempted to expand the area of concern beyond' Renton Hi11':s
. 29 t. .
boundaries . in- an attempt to buttress its argument that this
.30 f
action constitutes. spot zoning, but that position should be
31
rejected. Renton Hill- is ..now, ,and has for some time been, an,
32
identifiable' communi,ty ''and this rezone should be. evaluated with
Memo.. by '`.Renton Hll,l CQ,mm. Ass 'n GOUGE. Mc8ETH & FAULL
P. O. BOX 26 ,
etc. , RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055
Page- 5 . : ' • AL 5-5600
1 , its geographical boundaries in mind. If that is done, no spot
2 zoning exists in this case
3
4 III . REZONE - CONDITIONS/STANDARDS
5 When a. City Council acts to amend or change conditions
6 existing under established zoning laws , additional considerations
7 come into play. Before deciding to amend its zoning ordinance, a
8 city must weigh benefits which flow to the public generally
9 against the detriment, if any, to adjacent or otherwise affected
10 property owners or to the public which might result from such a
11 change. Several cases have discussed the factors which must be
12 taken into consideration •in evaluating rezone applications .
13 In Parkridge v. City of Seattle, 89 Wn. 2d 454 (1978) the
14 Court stated:
15 "In considering the evidence, we note that (1) there
16 is no presumption of validity favoring the action of
rezoning; (2) the proponents of the rezone have the
17 burden of proof in demonstrating that conditions have
substantially changed since the original zoning, or as
18 in this case, the 1959 amendment thereto; and (3) the
rezone must bear a substantial relationship to the
19 public health, safety, morals or welfare. "
20 We acknowledge these standards and feel we have met the re-
21 quirements they have placed upon us . In determining whether
22 these standards have been met, the following cases should be
23 considered:
24 In Carlson v. City of Bellevue, 72 Wn. 2d 41, 51 , .435 P. 2d
25 957 (1968) , the State Supreme Court set out the factors to be con-
26 sidered in evaluating a rezone application:
27 In determining whether or not a zoning ordinance is
.28 reasonable in its application to a given parcel of land,
among the factors to be taken into consideration are the
29 character of the neighborhood, existing uses and zoning
of nearby property, the amount by which property values
30 are decreased, the extent to which.: the diminution of
values promotes the public health, safety, morals or
31 welfare, the relative gain to the public as compared with
the hardship imposed upon the individual owner, the
32 suitability of the subject property for the purpose for
which it is zoned, and the length of time the property has
remained unimproved, considered in the context of the
Memo. by Renton -Hill Comm,. Ass ''n GOUGE. McBETH & FAULL
etc. , P. O. BOX 28
RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055
Page 6 AL 5-5600
.
1. land development in the area. No single factor is con-
trolling but each must receive due, consideration._ But-
2., to sustain an attack upon the validity of a zoning ordi-
. nance, an aggrieved property owner must show that if the •
3 ordinance is enforced the consequent restrictions on his
property preclude its use for any purpose to which it is-
4 reasonably adapted. He is required to show that there is
no possjibili.ty for profitable use .under the restrictions
. 5 of the ordinance, or alternatively that. the greater part
. . of the value of the property is destroyed by it, although
6 there may be some slight use remaining. Adaptability,
7 it has been declared, , envisages economic as' well as
functional use, and assumes not the most profitable use,
8 but that 'some permitted use can be profitable.
9 We feel that the evidence clearly establishes a change in
• 10 conditions that 'has occurred since the' original zoning in 1963
11 and that the rezone does bear a substantial relationship to the •
12 public health, safety, morals and welfare.
•
13 .. . .
14 IV. ' D'UTY TO CHANGE ZONING REGULATIONS ON CHANGE IN CONDITIONS
15 • Although zoning. implies 'a degree of permanency, the City is
16 under a duty, - when conditions relating to a zoned area have so . '
. 17 clearly changed as to emphatically call for revisions in zoning,
18 •
to initiate proceedings and consider the necessity of pertinent
19 modifications of their zoning ordinances . In Bishop v. Town of
20 Houghton, 69 Wn. 2d 786 , 792 , 420 , P . 2d (1966) , this concept was
21 expressed as follows :
.22
" [11 We have no quarrel with respondents ' basic theme
•
23 to the effect that while zoning implies. a degree of perma-
' nency, it not static and zoning ,auth.orities •cannot
24 blind themselves to changing conditions . . Thus , when .
conditions surrounding or in relation to a •zoned arealhave.
25 so clearly changed. as -to emphatically call for revisions.
. in • zoning, the appropriate zoning authorities are under
26 a . duty' to initiate proceedings and consider the necessity
. of 'pertinent modifications of their zoning ordinances .
27 Otherwise, outmoded zoning regulations ' can become un
reasonable, and the zoning •authorities ' failure to
2 • • .suitably amend or modify their ordinances can become arbi-
trary, in which • event Courts can and should grant appro •
-
29- t : priate relief.. :2..-Metzenbaum, Zoning 1125 (2d e.d:• J 955)' . "
30 This same idea was ''expressed in Farrell v. City of Seattle, supra-,
31 as follows,: ,
3? ,
-Memo. by Renton.-.W21.1._ Comm Assn '
• etc.:, - .. _ , ' GOUGE. Mc6ETH & FAULL
Page .7 P. O. BOX 26
-. RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055
AL 5-5600 , .
1 " [2] • We also recognize. th.at, .although zoning implies a
degree of permanency, municipal authorities must be re-
2 sponsive to changing. conditions and circumstances which
justify revision of existing zoning classifications.
'3 Otherwise, the outdated land use restrictions may become
unreasonable, and refusal to amend or modify zoning ordi-
4 . _ nances could result in arbitrary and unreasonable
conduct. 'Bishop v.' Town o'f •Hou'g'hon,' 69,'Wn. .2d 786 ,
5 A2,0 P. 2d' 368 (1966) . Although courts are not empowered.
6 to amend zoning ordinances , or rezone a particular property,
they may grant appropriate relief and declare the action .
,� of 'thezoning- authorities invalid, upon a' showing of un-
reasonable and arbitrary zoning action or inaction.
8 Bishop' v. Town of Houghton, supra; McNaugh:t'on v.' Boeing,
68 Wn'. 2d 659 , . 414 P. 2d 77'8 (1966) . "
9 This statement was quoted verbatim in" Mayer Built Homes, Inc:,,
10 v. The Town: of Steilacoom, . 17 Wn App 558 (1977)'. In that case,
11 the Plaintiff' s property was affected by' an-ordinance removing
12 "apartment houses" as a' permitted us'e in an existing zoning
13 , classification and by a later change in classification to one
14 which did., not permit-apartments . I.n separate .actions , the
15 Plaintiff'developer 'challenged the validity of the later' change '
16 and sought the issuance •of a building permit for an apartment
17 house. The developer .,argued. that the city acted arbitrarily and
18 capriciously in. rezoning his property and that the act so re-
19 duced its value as to amount to an unconstitutional confiscation .'
20 of his property': The Court's opinion in full is attached' to
21 this Memorandum for your review. The statement set forth above
22 in , Carlson was '
quoted verbatim in Mayer' a
y pproval. . Suffice
23 it .to say;. 'the Court held 'the City' s .action to be proper under.
24 the circumstances .existing in that case.
25 These. concepts were also discussed by the 'Court in Fleming'. v.
• 26 City ' of' Tac'oma, 81 Wn. 2d 292 , 295 , . 502 P. 2d 327. (1972) as follows :
27
" [] ] We 'have long passed the time when one may use his
28 land as he 'wishes provided it creates no nuisance. The conk
centration of population and, the infinite 'variety of' modern
29 'land uses necessitate effective land use planning. . The •
restrictions on use, inherent in zoning, insure that if one
30 uses his property in a way harmonious with the existing
zoning codes , he will be free from. the danger that the
• 31 future use of his neighbor 's land might be detrimental to
or foreclose' his 'own. established use. Decisions which
32 amend or change conditions under existing zoning laws
• Memo, by Reiton-'Hill-._Gomm._ Ass 'n
• . etc. , GOUGE, McBETH & FAULL
Page 8 P. O. BOX 26
' 'RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055
AL. 5-5600
•
1 therefore require an extremely sensitive balance between
individual rights and the public welfare. "
2
3 When all factors are considered, we feel that a change in
4 circumstances has occurred, that a change in zoning is now re-
5 quired and should be ordered.
6
7 V. SUMMARY
8 The Renton Planning Commission and Renton City Council have
9 before tham a request from residents on Renton Hill to make such
10 changes in our existing Comprehensive Land-Use Plan and Zoning
11 Ordinances so as to remove "apartment houses" as permitted uses
12 on Renton Hill. There is no question that the City has the
13 power to make such changes if they feel such changes are now
14 appropriate . We contend that circumstances have changed since
15 those ordinances were adopted and that the City now has an affirma-
16 tive duty to change both the Comprehensive Land-use Plan and Zoning
17 Ordinance to meet this new situation. The developers contention
18 that this change would result in economic ruin or would amount to
19 an unconstitutional taking of his property is without merit. No
20 vested rights exist until an application for a building permit is
21 filed, and that has not been done in this case. The Council and
22 the Planning Commission must consider the factors set forth in
23 the Mayer Built Homes case, and we feel confident that such review
24 will result in affirmative action by the City to make the changes
25 requested. '
26 Respectfully submitted
27
28 400
..
29 R6B E. Mc._
• Attorney at .Law
31
32 Memo. b
Y _Renton Hill Comm-: Assn.
etc. , .
.Page 9 GOUGE. McSETH & FAULL
P. O. BOX 26
RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055
AL. 5-5600
558 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977
May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM 559
[No. 1782-2. Division Two. May 11, 1977.]
Edwin Wheeler and Hutchins, Plumb & Wheeler, for
MAYER BUILT HOMES, INC., Appellant, v. THE TOWN respondents.
OF STEILACOOM, ET AL, Respondents. •
[1] Zoning — Judicial Review- — Arbitrary and Capricious REED, J.—Mayer Built Homes, Inc., (Mayer) appeals
Action — Determination. A party asserting that a zoning action from a superior court dismissal of petitions (1) seeking
is arbitrary and capricious has the burden of proving it was taken
review of the Town of Steilacoom's adoption of a new zon
without consideration and in disregard of facts and circumstances. A
zoning action is not invalid merely because it prevents the most ing classification encompassing property owned by Mayer,
profitable use of property or because a different action seems pref- and (2) seeking to compel the town to issue a permit for
erable to the court. construction of an apartment on the property. On appeal,
[2] Zoning— Validity —Confiscation—what Constitutes. TheC-;0 Mayer contends that the town acted arbitrarily and capri-
burden of showing such a diminution of property value resulting : ciously in rezoning the subject property and that the act so
•
from zoning as to amount to a confiscation is on the person asserting reduced its value as to amount to an unconstitutional con-
it. A reduction in the value of a particular property is justified by E fiscation. In addition, Mayer challenges the legality of an
benefit to the public so long as some profitable use of the property ti ordinance passed prior to the new zoning enactment, which
remains.
-. i removed from the zoning district certain uses then applica-,
[3] Zoning — Retroactivity — Vested Rights. A landowner_does 1 ble to the property. We affirm for the reasons set forth
not acquire rights under existing regulations until application is
11
made for a building permit, after which a change in the permitted below.
uses does not affect him. i In 1962 the Town of Steilacoom adopted a comprehen-
f sive plan for its future growth. It established various zoning
Nature of Action: The plaintiff's property was affected - p classifications and assigned most of the property within the
by an ordinance removing "apartment houses" as a permit- 4 corporate limits to a "low density residential" classification,
ted use in an existing zoning classification and by a later t the most restrictive then available. In 1963 Mayer acquired
change in classification to one which did not permit apart- two parcels so classified. These lay unimproved until 1967,
- ment houses. In separate actions, the plaintiff challenged v when both were rezoned "retail," a class which allowed cer-
he validity of the later change and sought the issuance of a F tain commercial uses and apartment houses. Mayer then
building permit for an apartment house. en, built an apartment house on the larger of its two parcels,
Superior Court: The plaintiff's actions were dismissed property not at issue herein. The smaller parcel, the subject
by the Superior Court for_Pierce County, Nos. 225146, of this appeal, remained unimproved without any building
229671, Horace G. Geer, J., on February 28, 1975. _ ` permits having been sought for it. Then on June 12, 1973,
Court of Appeals: The Court of Appeals finds the zon- the Town adopted ordinance No. 475, which in part pro-
ng actions in question not to have been arbitrary and - =.- hibited the construction of any "duplex or.multi—family
capricious or confiscatory and not,to constitute improper dwelling" in the retail use district in which the parcel lay.
- - Mayer did not challenge this ordinance at the time.
interim zoning or an invalid retroactive application of a - Early in 1974, the town planner petitioned for adoption
zoning enactment. The trial court's dismissal is affirmed. - of.ordinance Na. 496, which was designed to set up a new
Norman L. Martin, for appellant. - zoning classification of "neighborhood.commercial" to allow
areas of transition between existing commercial uses of
. - property and the residential neighborhoods that had grown
z j..
May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM 561
560 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 -
up nearby. Among the uses allowed in a neighborhood $8,500 to $10,500 as "retail" versus $4,500 to $7,500 under
proposed neighborhood commercial usage.
commercial zone are single—family homes and duplexes, He agreed that
and business offices multi—family residential development was the highest and
professional , public and semi—public best use, but seemed to assume that such usage was still
uses, barber and beauty shops, travel bureaus, and "spe- permitted in the retail district. The council continued the
cialty stores" dealing in antiques, books, food, flowers, gifts, meeting to allow study of the reports, and upon reconven-
jewelry and photography. Designed to reduce the ordinary ing on May 21, 1974, it affirmed assignment of Mayer's
commercial impact of these uses were such features as property into the neighborhood commercial classification.
restrictions on building height and sign size, a requirement [1] We consider first Mayer's argument that the town
for side yards, a limitation on number of employees, and a council's rezoning of his property must be voided due to its
quirement for advance approval of proposed building
(„,;�j arbitrary and capricious nature. A zoning act is subject to
clans. Mayer's property was among those sites subject to " ' judicial review only for manifest abuse of discretion. The '
rezone under this ordinance. party asserting that a legislative authority has abused its
The matter went first before the town planning commis- 0 discretion by acting arbitrarily and capriciously, i.e., with-
sion in a public hearing on February 11, 1974, attended by P out consideration and in disregard of the facts, has the
Mayer's president and several people living near Mayer's
burden of proof; if the zoning classification is fairly debat-
property. The town planner, Dennis Clarke, explained that i able, it will be sustained. State ex rel. Myhre v. Spokane,
the proposed creation of a new zoning classification was to 70 Wn.2d 207, 210, 422 P.2d 790 (1967). A municipality's
satisfy the policy of the comprehensive plan, i.e., that corn- ss zoning action should be reviewed with the following
patible land uses should be combined and separated from
approach in mind, as adopted in Carlson v. Bellevue, 73
noncompatible uses by buffer strips, transitional uses, and Wn.2d 41, 51 435 P.2d 957 (1968):
other, similar devices. As things then existed, there was no o '
In determining whether or not a zoning ordinance is
way to buffer residential areas from the noise, traffic and F.
reasonable in its application to a given parcel of land,
other characteristics of retail use. After hearing comments Y among the factors to be taken into consideration are
from members of the audience, many of whom were con- the character of the neighborhood, existing uses and
" rned about the adverse effect retail use would have on zoning of nearby property, the amount by which prop-
, l air nearby homes, the planning commission unanimously CIO
erty values are decreased, the extent to which the dim-
recommended adoption of the new classification and inution of values promotes the public health, safety,
morals or welfare, the relative gain to the public as
assignment to it of four parcels, including Mayer's. On May = . . compared with the hardship imposed upon the indi-
7, 1974, the town council conducted a public hearing to = vidual owner, the suitability of the subject property for
consider adoption of the neighborhood commercial zoning { the purpose for which it is zoned, and the length of
ordinance. The council heard Mayer's position and those of time the property has remained unimproved, consid-
the town planner and objecting neighbors of the property. =- ' - ered in the context of the land development in the
Mayer submitted two reports on the financial effect the = area. No single factor is controlling but each must
: its Property. An _, receive due consideration. But to sustain an attack
rezone would have on
p p y. appraiser -opined = upon the validity of a zoning ordinance, an aggrieved
that the highest and best use of the property was for - _ " property owner must show that if the ordinance is
apartments, in which case it was Worth $12,000; this he enforced the consequent restrictions on his property
contrasted with a value of$5,500 under neighborhood com- - -
mercial usage. A real estate broker valued the property at
562 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977
May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM 563
preclude its use for any purpose to which it is reason- _
ably adapted. He is required to show that there is no intersecting the property, and the need to control traffic
possibility for profitable use under the restrictions of and noise in the area. In addition, we have alreadynoted
the ordinance, or alternatively that the greater part of
the value of the property'is destroyed by it, although that many. neighbors voiced their fears that permitting
there may be some slight use remaining. Adaptability, retail uses .would bring more people into the area, with
it has been declared, envisages 2conomic as well as attendant traffic congestion and noise;- many, in fact,
functional use, and assumes not the most profitable favored a rezone of the site to a purely residential classifi-
use, but that some permitted use can be profitable. cation, without even the sedate business activities contem-
z.
(Footnotes omitted.) 8 E. McQuillin,-Municipal Corpora- plated under "neighborhood commercial." The town council
`
'ons 25.45, at 111 (3d ed. rev. 1976). proceedings of necessity followed an informal format, lack-
1• _ We agree with the trial court that Mayer" failed in itsing the niceties of courtroom evidentiary procedures so that
burden of proving the ordinance was adopted arbitrarily ; the interested citizens could express their views. The zoning
and capriciously. Mayer relies heavily on the opinions as to decision, therefore, was based on opinion and speculation as
reduction in value presented to the council, which allegedly : to the future of the area and the need to establish the sub-
demonstrate that the rezone would preclude use of the ject property as a transitional area according to the com-
property for "any useful purpose to which it is reasonably ii prehensive plan. With the trial court, we agree it would
adapted." There are, however, certain deficiencies associ- 1= have been preferable for the town council to have based its
ated with reliance on the opinion letters. Neither letter =; decision on a more factual basis. We believe, nevertheless,
It
compared the property's value if used for purposes allowed II that the zoning ordinance has support in the record and is
under neighborhood commercial zoning with uses permitted % not a "wilful and unreasoning action, in disregard of facts
under the current retail classification. Instead, both worked I and circumstances." Northern Pac. Transp. Co. v.
from the premise that the highest and best use would be for ki Washington Utils. & Transp. Comm'n, 69 Wn.2d 472, 478,
apartments, and compared that value of the property with 418 P.2d 735 (1966). Where there is room for two opinions,
its value if zoned neighborhood commercial; this approach ,.1 a zoning action is not arbitrary and capricious when exer-
,,nored the fact that apartments were no longer permitted - cised honestly and upon due consideration, even though a
ader .the retail classification, and that the council was different conclusion might have been reached. Bishop.v.
being asked to consider an alleged devaluation of the prop- CO Houghton, 69 Wn.2d 786, 420 P.2d 368 (1966). -
erty if changed from uses permitted under "retail" to those E We turn next to the allegedly confiscatory application of
possible .under "neighborhood commercial." In addition, the zoning :ordinance to Mayer's property. Mayer relies
neither letter explained the method of valuation employed upon Hauser.v. Arness, 44 Wn.2d 358, 267 P.2d 691 (1954),
in arriving,at the stated'figures, and one author expressly which contains language supportive of property rights, such
disclaimed any status as a competent appraiser. ' as the following at page 369: -
The trial court characterized the case in support of a Zoning laws that result in relatively little gain or benefit
rezone as "skinny." It consisted primarily of the town to the public while inflicting serious injury or loss on the
planner's dissertations on a purpose of the comprehensive - - property owner have always been held by this court to be
plan to impose buffer zones between commercial and resi- - - confiscatory and void.
dehtial activities, the progression of the area to a residen- Mayer argues that.the opinion letters show a severe reduc-
'tial neighborhood, the projected future for the roads tion in value, that the public would gain little from the
rezone, and that the action amounts to a confiscation.
564 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM 565
[2] We have noted the failure of the opinion letters to Section 1 of ordinance No. 475 provides:
competently demonstrate that the rezone from. "retail" to The intent of this ordinance is to establish certain
"neighborhood commercial" 'would diminish the property's interim zoning modifications in the zoning code of the
value. While we agree there.must be some benefit to the Town pending the adoption of a new comprehensive plan
public before a zoningdecision will be allowed to diminish and new zoning ordinance, and to prohibit development
of a nature which appears contrary to the intent of the
the value of property, here the public in the form of many present comprehensive plan and the general welfare of
area residents, argued that they would be benefited by the the citizens of the Town.
uses permitted under a rezone and, indeed, would prefer 1 Despite the use of the word "interim" in the above section,rn
yen greater restrictions. Moreover, the opinion letters of we do not believe that it is in fact an interim zoning ordi-
_.Zayer's appraisers spoke of a reduction in value of approx- jiL
• nance. There is no reference to any emergency situation,
imately one-half, but there was no evidence the property C'C4 nor is there any indication in the ordinance or elsewhere in
could not be put to a profitable use, as required by Carlson i1 the record that the Town deviated from the regular notice
v. Bellevue, supra. By way of comparison, in Carlson the tl and hearing procedures specified in RCW 35.63.100 et seq.
court upheld a rezone that allegedly reduced the value of (i Ordinance No. 475 in fact makes several substantive
the property from $60,000 to $2,500. It is with poor grace changes in the zoning code. It reclassifies several tracts of
that Mayer complains of a reduction in value when it land, eliminates two use districts, amends the comprehen-
fl
acquired the property at a time when it was zoned more ? sive plan, and, as pertinent here, redefines the retail use
restrictively than "neighborhood commercial," then 1 district so as to prohibit the construction of duplexes and
obtained an apparently greater valuation due to a 1967 multi-family units. These zoning changes, being permanent
change but chose not to build as then permitted, and now i- to the extent any zoning. ordinance is permanent until
begrudges the town's attempt to fall back to an intermedi- ii modified or,replaced by a later one, are sustainable as an
ate zoning position. In any event, Mayer has not borne its vattempt "to prohibit development . . . contrary to the
burden of showing such a diminution in value as to amount intent of the present comprehensive plan." (Italics ours.)
`-) a confiscation. See 1 R. Anderson, American Law of We cannot agree with Mayer's contention that the ordi-
' oning § 3.25 (2d.ed. 1976). `',s nance is an example of interim zoning which must fall
Finally we address the challenges'to ordinance No. 475, :."�' because it fails to declare a termination date and was not
i.e:, that it is an example of illegal "interim zoning" and _ passed as an emergency measure. That it does hot contain
that'it should be applied to parcels zoned "retail" only after those elements is further evidence that the Town simply
the effective date of the ordinance. - enacted changes in its existing zoning laws to effectuate the
Interim zoning describes a process whereby a govern- purposes. of its then existing comprehensive plan; such an
mental body in response to an emergency situation tempo- = ordinance was within the Town's authority. McNaughton v.
racily establishes an ordinance to classify or regulate usesof ="' Boeing, 68 Wn.2d 659, 414 P.2d 778 (1966).
land pending either revision of the existing zoning code or [3] The rule on retroactivity of zoning changes is that
adoption of a final, comprehensive zoning plan.--1 A. application for a building permit vests in the applicant the
Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning § 11.01 (4th - right to use his property as then permitted, and that a sub-
ed. 1975); Smith v. Skagit County, 75 Wn.2d 715, 453 P.2d sequent change of zone cannot divest him of that right.
.832 (1969); see RCW 36.70.790. ' State ex rel. Ogden v. Bellevue, 45 Wn.2d 492, 275 P.2d
-
-
3
566
MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 - May 1977 BOVY v. GRAHAM,COHEN&WAMPOLD 567
899 (1954). Mayer had not, however. - for a permit to The judgment is affirmed.
build a structure on its property w_ 3es permitted PETRIE, C.J., and RINGOLD, J. Pro Tem., concur.
under the retail classification prior to adoption of ordinance
No. 475. The ordinance,, on its face, limits the uses for
property in the then existing retail use district. Once the
ordinance disallowed certain uses within the retail district, ____ ____
Mayer's property was subject to the reduced usages possi-
ble, no other use having vested.
Although not explicitly argued, Mayers_challenge to the
( retroactivity of the Town's zoning changes is subject to
another interpretation. Ordinance No. 475 forbade the con- C: CeD
:,
struction of multi-family dwellings on Mayer's property,
having eliminated that use from the retail district. The
effect was to prevent such construction until passage of f;
ordinance No. 496, so that it would have been futile for Y!
Mayer to_have applied for a permit to build a multi-family
structure-after adoption of ordinance No. 475. Given that 11
fact, Mayer's argument can be interpreted to be that, if ti
iF
ordinance No. 475 is invalid, then the result must be that • ev
Mayer would have been entitled to obtain a multi-family ,
permit up until passage of ordinance No. 496, which could ;
not lawfully relate back to the passage of an earlier, invalid ;:i
ordinance so as to prevent the construction of multi-family ,i
dwellings prior to ordinance No. 496. In sum, if ordinance v7
t No. 496 validly prohibits multi-family dwellings on Mayer's <
- property, it does,so only as of its own effective date, and '41
invalidation of ordinance No. 475 would, until that date, r
_ leaveMayer,where it was before adoption of ordinance No. <:1
475, namely,-able to build a multi-family dwelling as then -
-_. permitted in "retail." This argument, however, is premised •--'
on the invalidity of:ordinance No. 475. With that ordinance ;
having been upheld, the argument falls. :
, t
•
POLK DIRECTORY
1963 - 1977
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
JUN 2 01978
AM PM
7i6,9t10111112o 1,213,4,5,E
r IT NO.
ip -
'IDLER, McBROOM, GATES & BALE I
• 1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
Memorandum
To: JRI • Date: 19 JUNE 78 •
From: MICHELE Re: Renton Hills Downzoning •
(Street Study)
MILL AVENUE SOUTH (south from S. 3rd Street intersection)
1963-:197.7: Street addresses decreased by 4 during this
period. However, where there were 25 available apartment
units in 1963 , there were 39 available by 1972. All 14
hew units (2 complexes) appear in the 400 block. A
breakdown of the five year' s data we' have follows. A
red star indicates there are street numbers in that
block followed by (1/2) . This , I would imagine, could
reflect a trailer' or guest house on the property or
perhaps a basement apartment or room for rent.
1963 300 block = 6
(24) * 400 " = 11 (Includes one 5-unit apartment . complex
• and addresses at 404 1/2 & 410 1/2)
500 " = 6
600 " = 1 (This is a 20-unit apartment complex)
•
•
24
•
1972 300 block = 4 (two State Dept. of Hwy. offices, located
(22) at 311 and 316 in 1963, are -no longer
listed)
k'400 " = 12 (412, which was vacant in 1963, is now
• an 8-unit apartment complex. 422 , which
•
was not listed in 1963, is a 6-unit
• apartment complex. Still includes
. addresses at 404 1/2 '& 410 1/2. )
500 = 5 (503, which was vacant in 1963, is no
longer listed. )
600 = 1
22
1973 300 block = 4
(22) ar 400 " = 12 No change from 1972
500 , " - 1
• 22
•
• 1975 300 block = 4
(21) *400 :. : " . = 11 (430, which was vacant in 1973, is no
• longer listed)
• 500 " 5
• 600 " ' = 1
21
1977 Addresses decreased by 1 since1975 (328 no longer, listed)
•
20
„, :. in jr"."
ru''+ 'u"i,v' s BLreOS - •• . - .. -
222 Mill 8t. BAldwln 6-1680 222 WBllsm ,col 1
�r( 2009 Gannon Jack K G AL -A-+
+ 10 m on
..
Meadowns Ellen Mill—Could 6-4960
•'( 215 Evans E Mrs O AL MILL —From Commercial gpg Chalet The apts 2016 Wallis Wm B O AL "'' c
Waterway No 2, 1 east of Main 1 Costagno Dennis bA988
6 4309 u. 'V
• A 218 Podriznik Frank J O'AL Bronson way Intersects 2 Page Harold BA 6-6288 2020 Lee Harold C O AL
i _ '� b 2924 120 Lbr Mkt Riverside(whse) 3 Bohart Eva Mra
125 Joe's Sery gas sta 4 Haeft Keith S 2021 Salter6Lloyd W O AL v� r. . -41
••
219 Montgomery
Paschild 6-1737 AL b 9844 5 Hanson Lea F Mrs BA5-9846 .� ��
•
+. `1� ! o"0 222 Leon G BA. r•.'. 12 6-0700 2027 Stewart O 6 9747 y o.t,k
„( 8 b759 2d av Intersects 6 Schriber Kirk E 2028 Stewart
Joe Oscar ALF GAL r • +j'
}:f
-� 0 °' 223 Lantz Peter K O AL 6 9440 202 Vacant 7 Escola Chas R 6 3876 to a
i, :+ � ” '^ 225 No return • 204 McClung Wm L BA 8-0868 g Colville Ann Mrs ''
.t , ' 2?8 Plute Rose Mrs ® 210 Williams Rocksie Mrs O 9 Smutny Peter 2033 Vacant T O AL i -n ", =
Cn fs, m AL 5 4795 10 Orrell Wm L 2038 Veness Eugt w 73 ",
i ��,]] 227 Phillips Albert W V' m 04
l •� r4] ° 230 Shopin Walter C O AL 6a213 211 Mason Dwight N 11 Aichele Dennis O 2037 Abne y Percy O AL o , :
. Q Q 235 Hamel Ovlla 215 Williams Wesley B O AL 12 Smith Bertha J Mrs BA 5-7690 p -
• °" V 236 Johnson Arth L O`AL 5oore 6-5438 2042 Mathre Anders L S Rev r+, VOL
5 4452 Mooro Eva L Mrs AL 13 Neidhart James R BA AL 5-8534 to �1 3
ma 5-5674
239 Ward Robt L G AL b 3295 6-3153 2045 Walls M C O
21614Swafford Marian
239 ta Sandy O AL 5r3948 14 Byrd Wm E 2048 McKean Howard A O AL t'�
AL 6-3715
� 242 Braaten Hjalmer 0 BA 21R Petermeyer5-43 Gertrude J Mrs 15 Carpine Victor J 5-1313 max`
�� 6 1785 GAL 6 4313 16 Vacant 2051 Carruthers Hector K G D r
222 Autobahn Inc autos BA 16 Minera Everett AL Carruthers
°i
CO 0
`� -I 243 rdulis Geo O 8-1680
243 Park Marguerite C Mrs ® 18 Barnes John 2054 Peretti Lewis O`AL � yy('
t g235 Fire Dept Sta No 1 AL 18 Barnescant 5 sett to ^ ~
w ; r 251 Mulligan Jeannett R Mrs O 20 Gorden HarryH
i '� ° AL 6 5490 Firemen's3 Union Local 14 2057 Wright Christopher O N •� 0 +
o No 864From AL 5 1857
91 av N intersects MONTEREY DRIVE— 2063 Corey Robt O AL 5 3746 U + , :,
300 Richter Wm G AL b-3916 CDIStPKPRR tracks crossBronson pl east and south 2100 Corey Hazelett bt J O AL `�
• �.o 305 Browne Joseph Mrs BA Pa lla Coast v I tersecacks cross in semi-clr, 1 west of 11it 5-9368 R; • '-' �;
8 4128 Walla Walla nv intersects Olivet way 2103 Clow Glen E G AL ►�
3d av intersectsA�'.
310 Jas B BA 8-2626 Angelo J O AL A
311 State Dept of Highways- 1814 Barei 6-5339
310 Jackson Harvey R O AL Engineering Field Ofc AL 5-7682 2109 Vacant � `
b 3945 91 1815 Grubesic Angeline Mrs U 2115 Brown Wm J O AL x � '
no.�i 311 Lelydahl Hazel Mrs BA 316 State 5-13Dept of Highways-Rest- AL 6-0306 5 4889 co Oa . W
0
C 6-1423 dent Engs Ofc AL 5-1606 1820 Schultz Milton J AL 2121 Vacant
c• 315 Shepherd Donald W BA 320 Blnsick John C O AL&7861 6-5214 2121 •
Vacanster Harry L 0 w 11r +
•+i u Z 6-0785 324 Milbrad Richd F 1821 Boehme Chas M O AL AL 5 4841 • rn _ ,,:
o 319 Nelson Edith G Mrs AL 328 Toman Jas C) AL 5-5398 6 5643 , 2131 Vacant �"fl f, !•_ ;,. v
'� _v Y- 5-408e 336 Hansen Raymond H O AL 1826 Howard Edw W G AL 2131 V cant Raymond E p- N
Y 6-3895 12 01 r
1 • 6-3024
, N 322 Fee Denver 4th av intersects 1827 Skreen Chester O AL biORRIS—From 2d av south, m a �.� r-I I , •+ '
a, a 322 Winslow Amanda G Mrs AL• 400 Trottman John C G AL 5-7157 b avest of Main Q •CICI. = i +n b 1849 5-5941 1832 Blencoe Harry A O AL 205 Thompson Jack S Q BA ~�`
,. e a c to 325 Farkas Jos O AL 6 1282 5 7376 Z '
404 Cullers Chester A 6-0316
m & 328 Clough Natalie M BA 8 2643 4041hCrossoz Mark 1833 Diamblri Vi'm O AL 209 Rowley Wm L AL 6-0853 -« -1: •
f'" ` Z 329 Holmes Mildred E Mra O Crosson Otto M 5 2081 ri ' �,
■>s■ AL 5 6T03 1838 5-2081 r Robt J O AL 213 B 5 77Mae F Mrs O AL o M'
1` ' L 7I e - 410 MYkrts Nick M AL 6-3121 �' �'
330 Vetterling Edna Mrs O AL •4101,4Scholz Esther E Mra BA 5-7755 Apartments e�
m 1845 Ames Geo W O AL b-3092 280 Roxy r, : ".t.
�� & 6-2189 8-4857 1850 Gilmore Robt T G BA 1 Matthews Esther AL 5-6293 "��� i •�•_�.
2 Stultz June J he 5 7646 do t
334 Rowe Douglas R G AL 412 Vacant 6-2866 3 Mohundro Wm E AL '^ .4
4, la I w Holma 418 ApartmentsMergnee Alt P G AL 6-0084 1851 Toschi Walter H O`AL 6-5633 0 �.■ N,
u 335 Sanfry C AL 6 7921 426
f-----7
N 1 Saker Frank AL 5 9888 5-7687 Lillie Mra G AL p, +• o. m
,' 3. 338 F 6 4928 Richd W O AL 2 Vacant Ronald E D O 5-3823AL 4 Fey
00 � Q
N . 1857 White Wm A Oa.
it ,0dJ 3 Vacant 1863 Garrison Logan5 Pella Alec AL 5 3164 0 ,(
et p . lc if k o 339 Vi'ittmeyer Ann E Mrs O AL 4 Dean Chas C 6 3608 6 Meyer Jane C Mrs AL h 4
6 3218 u,c! fTf
5-9532 5 Ells Jess 1889 'Joos Norman O AL 6 3103o▪ C' "t-,oi ,
1902 Peretti Rainier O AL 7 Lewis Lillie A AL 6 7546 E >' 341 Thorns Vernie E O AL 6trect continued 8 Adderson Jean Mra ... O ��
6 3261 430 Paseo Lucy Mrs O AL 6-2829
' tit 6 b384 1903 Capps Donald A G AL 9 AFashdde Lois W Mrs �. • u+t
344 Carroll Joe L O AL d 9867
r 434 Toman Jas A O AL 6-7418 6-225? gd av intersects o
3 t' 345 Pieper
93g Tomac Jos T OO AL 6-0301Apartments • • +Y btFa •
M•, rY;. U i, 345 Earl R O AL 6-60141:; 1909 Houser Paul W O'AL 306 llcaalbloseom P w
•
1 fith av Intersects ° 6-7445 1 Beanb1o�m Ella Mrs •..� N9 '.
t 0 3-17 Se erg Geo E G BA 84887 600 Butler Janet M Mrs O AL 1912 Castile Kenneth W O AL
350 Reynolds Richd AL 5-3631 6_397g 6-4184 2 g swell 440yd m• A ill:'
c a. 356 See Carroll V O AL 5-5387 S03 Vacant 1016 SIn*,er Doan A € AL 8 Hall Shirley i '
Z 358 Thcrnsberry C R 512 WrightrVirgil BA 8-1033 6-0510 4 Hall Every t
'•' O 358 Vacant 520 WrlPh Fannie E Mrs O AL (;nprl av Intersects 6 Ladwlg Lula J Mrs WN
' Vacant 5-7166 1921 I3ealt t Belmont O AL ,.2
PI" - 8 Templeton Janet Mrs V �' • i Jw ''. . 358 rl35 Gabriel Ae L O AL 6 8288 fi24 Haves gam6-2630AL leto 0 O�Nii
4th av N Intersects 538 DuBois Chas B O AL 5-7460 2003 Holmstrom Rodger E O Street continued '
Piggott av Intersects „ Bth av Intersects AL 6 0218
i
•
rj w MEADOW AV N—Contd 3203 Lambro Harry T OO CITY IIALL--Contd 102 Vacant1,1
f i ) 336 Farrow Richd W @ ALb-4928 BA6-9331 let FI City Purchasing Dept 201*Taggar Charles 228 1909 j k l t
•' 1 11 339 Wittmeyer Ann E Mrs O 3209 Klincfelter Richd O 228 3310 202*Tnggnrt Marshall L
'I ' AL5-9532 3215 Fortune Leonard 10° r "R " "
2d Fl Police Court 236 2u64 226-7622
341 Thomas Vernie E AL5.3261 2d FI City Council Chambers 203*Robinson B �;+ "�
ALb 2718 Y 301*Clark Susan N 228 1988 e.. ' '�i
p ° 2d FI City Hall (Utilit re 7 «A r {•,
� �� 344 Carroll Joseph L ® ALb9887 3221 Page James A O AL6-2598 � ','
+ 345 Pieper Earl R ° 2d Fl Humming Bird Inn restr 302*Ward L ft `` ;
I 3301 Ralph
Mrs O 1 ri:i�
347 Vacant 330713 Ralph Russell L O • 236-2529 303*Susa T V t i + ;
i 350*Hall Keith 3313 Sienda John Jr O Al 3583 3d Fl CityDept 2ep 2b40 g
Bldg 418*N2er net Alf P O BA6-1738 s 7
353 Vacant 3d Fl Park Dept 235-2560 • t 3319 Ponder Charles F O 422 Apartments
3d Fl City Pks & Recreation t i .,.,
(' 356 Norfleet Jerry L BA8-2487 AL6-3157 Dept 236-2560 101*Breitling Fay � ,� � ��
358 Barrett James BA8-0868 3407 Henry Joe F @ 102*Curran Dennis t, �t� ,
359 Smith 0 Russell O AL5-5908 3413 Prellwitz Leo A O 3d Fl City Parks e Recreation
. 3503*Krantz Richd O Dept (Conference Rm) 201*Eadea Dan t��,
3d Fl City Planning Dept 202 Kirkaldie Bob r K y4,.
>�s " 20 3509 Vacant s ;.
t 2219 Walt Leslie C O BAB 6571235-2550 301*Hart Jerry
3515 Montgomery *eldon E O 4th Fl City Eng 235 2631 302*Bendara Dick +� ;rt
N 24TH ST INTERSECTS AL6 9693 City Dept426 Apartments
2407 Ames Frank E O BA6-2535 3606 Robel Eug F @ AL5-7776 4th Fl Of Public f "
2411 Hoven Wm J O 255-0573 3607 Nelson Emil H O Alb 6760 Works 236 25fi9 1*Hewitt Juanita
r 4th Fl City Traffic Dept `�r+`s'
',f` •
2415 Vacant 3613 Mitchell Gordon C Jr O R 2*Glenn Kathyh
s' 2418*Fakharzadeh Javad 228-1231 AI6 7416 236 2620 3 Crutchfield Va Nita R 1 y Ur .•-
a, 2419 Collier's Masonry BA6-1912 3701 Zimmerman Roy L 226-4249 5th Fl County Diet Ct 271-1485 ! �
c 1• Collier Geo F O BA6-1912 3704 SavageIIA6Muni 4*Call Colette V 1 "'' t, :
r. Richd K O 271-0765 5th Fl City Municipal Court r t �.J(.
a.,�: 2421 Aliment Ray J O BA6-5033 3705 Clasen Harold R O w 23b 2564 5*Nyberg John ,I � ;f
r i, 2422 Van Ausdal Homer A 0° BA66686 6th Fl City Atty 235-2500 430 Vacant ��
ALL-3022 O • :. w1s
? 3708 Ritz Aud©teen S Mrs O 6th Fl Mayor 235 2580 434 Smith L A • ,
2502 Muller Gerhard K O BA6 4017 6th Fl City Council 236-2683 436*Severn Jerry O 226 2271 0 1 t.1*,;
i BA6 3762 3709 Moffatt Robt L BA8 2897t
y S 5TH ST INTERSECTS U % + * '!
6th Fl Cit Fire Dept 236 2642
• t 2504 Shelton Evelyn Mrs 3713 Baker James C O ALS-5145 500*Williams Preston E O
2b06*Anderso❑ KerryO 6th Fl Iki OC Pub Wks & ° a �4;, ,,t«-
ha 3716 Grinolde Willis 226-7167 Airports 23b 2b91 256-3973 F{ ''''':'''''';'....1
,y h v
r• . • 2506 Lowder Geo W O 3719 Rose Jay II 0 IIA8 1641 �t
i 44STREET CONTINUED 512 Thelander Charles A O v �rt^.i
Y 2507 Cullers Chester A O 3804 VirgilloJames a
211 Vacant BA6 4812 , ,'; .
vitt. t ALb 2685 3902 Johnson Vera S Mrs 0° 215 Vacant
2510 Alfarone Jerry O BA6 1924 BA6-8272 520 Vacant a +h S : •, i
N 26TH ST INTERSECTS Vacant p 1 .k
524 Vacant ;., 1 y
` +° 3903 Carrolli Thee A O AIb2938 215SS Vacant Qa 1
t 2603 Vacant Y 638 Du Bois Charles B O �
• • 3909*Corbett Bill 217 Petermeyer Gertrude J Mrs �`4 t >
2604 Benny Ronald D O 3932 Shreve Wayne C O O AL 5-4313 6TH ST I �`��7 _�` �w
•' 1, BA8-2533 ALb-9443 23b Firemen's Union Local 864 S ST INTERSEC'I5 �a� y,n {#
e, 2607 Boehme Joseph C O N 40TH ST INTERSECTS City Fire Dept Sta No 1 606 Chalet The apse ,� "gyp
AL b 2168 4008 Fawcett Robt A 0° ALb-0401 23b 2555 1*Trwitzke M W r '. .......rat
x, 2609*HofTman David D O �; C M ST P & P RR TRACKS 2*Collins L ..,_ �`,
L 2261600 ° 10 CROSS 3 Zehnder Susanflii' y y
2610 Barlet Mark S O 226-4449 MILL AV S —FROM CEDAR PACIFIC COAST RR TRACKS z. ie1' ��,R,t'7
2611*Erikaen Ronald O 4 Backman Dorothy ,q,, J� �;
�� 2613 Drew Melin O AL5-6205 RIVER WATERWAY SOUTH ti, CROSS 5*Barrows Lynn 255-6566 • a
C1 EAST OF MAIN AV 9 HOUSER AV S INTERSECTS � '`� u
2615 La Valley Wm T O 6*Shay B '4 r �•Ora`
{ S 3D ST INTERSECTS
ALb 6378 7*Stone D ` 4 I +��}," tt �`
2616 Clow Allen J O IIA66624 ZIP CODE 98055 320 Vacant ° c r , t.,
-.I. g 8*Matter Barb t� i' � I''
BRONSON WY S INTERSECTS 324 Angelo Nick O
k • 2704 Hammond Edw OO 9 R J i r e.
328 Wright Anna C 226-1849 Burkey
BA6-2910 12 336 Hansen Raymond H O 10 Best Tim
,` 2710 BA81b087 Lorenz N O S 2D ST INTERSECTS ALb-3024 11*Paschke G t �y »
�, 200 City Hall BA8-3310 S 4Tll ST INTERSECTS 12*Ford S 1 r y r
g.
2711 Frankcle Edw J 4 226-1930 Police Dept 235-2600 400 No Return 13*Jenkins Martin ;I 1,,.A.:,.,
'- 2712 Bowlin Chalmer H © Floors 404 Niceen David B AL5-1788 14*Knapp L ,',4
1 BA6-4946 1st Fl City Clerk 235-2500 4041/2 Mc Donough Kathy N 16*Richards W W F ) _;;
•2715 Arthalony Stephen E O 1st Fl Data Processing Dept 2264lau 16 Ferguson Simone Mrs t !i
BA8-b093Y..,
235 2b39 410 Grove Claudine E Mrs AL54018 ' ''. •: r
'�. 2716 O'Neal Terry G @ BA6.6206 1st Fl CityUtilities Dept ALb 7364
?�1• 2717 Geffre Jerome G O 17 Hamilton Wm D
° 235-2520 410'h Scholz Esther E Mrs . I+ ,, '',
la BA6-0742 let Fl City Finance Dept 18 Kristiansen Rolf
BA6-4857 � f; a'i.
19 Vacant • IA '••r,
2719 Vacant BA8-3310 412 Apartments
20 Frost Ernest y •
+ "{y
r t0.„ C) 101*Kamp Kern 2721 Machlis John BA6-1236 1st Fl City Print Shop •
•
a •t '.
s`. � et.`Y' . ,. K a ' a y, ,' "' t
3t +a . cr}• •3.a T. ,' a s - • i x. _ _•. . ` •3c ,,,fA, ,f,,tirS ,134,1 •41"L X ,y$ rs h s, w. 1,, c . -:-, ''r • F '
S r ,* w _ N. , + ,e.'_t.
P . .,
• M L. ; f T F W
f
•
S Jz'l. .' : , r •.',.....x •--e k -.- r d+ :,_"rya' J/ .. • , v +. •,1 _
y,.r • ,�:� ;3•' �.,.�3'.,,.yYp, t+,I'' } im r P r. •''� 6 3 S ' /" 4r • f ' �*
'-d• '"#� i ,h tr �,Ps; `• -: yr tSKONSON• 620 R r r- , , • _ x
rJz.7-i., e .,,• F:;..,n c*,"u,_�f'' r; . f.i.�.. WINDSOR-E Aism S 7 : + ` ' 'Sri �.... •x-- ` •
•
.s ue ,,..,,s i.� ,h' r -�-_ ►f T AND NORTH 712-1 ..> r� =-,-'' . _tx .� ? T ; .
r, � '= � c r, c oY ND
�1,p,R DIRECTION 715 F , ' s '" ` ' "•'
179 # .
A FULL Y Charlmer A O
a�cF 2712 Bowling - ,s
E YOU ^"K ' • =: 322 MEADOW°" n� G 2715 Arthalon4y Stephen E 0 `',...
�L BANK -- AL5 so51 B85093
MCMSCR r.o.I.C. h-': : h 0° AL5-1282 2716 O'Neal Terry G OO BA6.6`L� •! �".��..
- 325 Farkas Josep �:...
IN BRANCH: lU7 Rainier Ave.S. Y 326*Center Joseph C 2717 Geffre Jerome G BA6 6742 "K•, s ;,
329 Holma Mildred E Mrs O n Robt J BA81425 9'r: %w"
2719 Kaufman ;w-1 'T
'- AL.ri-6703 - .,��
'>?_==" 2721*Machlis John T BA6-114;1
'y`�- ' 330 Rowe Wm T Jr 271-036'1 g203 Lambro Harry T
Lou A Mrs 0 14>`,: Ernie F BA6 2091 1i`:; �%
y 334 Fortuey BA6 9331 - R-- •;?>;;
I Barbara .;t. ` ::. C O•AL5-7921 ° •-�
;-F 336 Farrow
S Richd
3209 Klinefelter Richd O n. �" -.
- - 0 928 ° w.„ ,..,.
Larry 336 Farrow Richd W O AL5-4 3215 Fortune Leonard I O .i6,y ,
`' ':: 339 Wittmeyer Ann E Mrs AL5-2716
ghan Jeanne M • =.
l Curtis BA8 2047 :.. AL5 9532 3221 Page James A O AL5-2596 _h4--'
Willard 341 Thomas Vernie E AL5-3261 3301 Titus Eliz Mrs O
as 344 Carroll Joseph L O AL5-9867 3307 Ralph Russell L O "�s":e
; Thos E �:: ' 345 •
Pieper Earl R O 3313 Sienda John Jr O ALS-3583
t x 'r' ` 347 Vacant 3319 Ponder Charles F O _ �+'
;ks Ralph . '--,=
Caul Lamont D 271-1491 ALS 3157 '
t Jay `* = 350 3407 Henry doe F • "
nen Anita = .','' 353 Vacant h-
356*Norfleet Jerry L BAS-2487 3413 Prellwitz Leo A 0 —
on Frances' E Mrs ='°'"' ' .i.t,.
358 Barrett James BAS-0868 3503 Vacant Roy W O •:�
t.Lillie M Mrs 359*Smith O Russell O AI.5-5908Q9 Worley Le .1t
It ;f�. tq ry Weldon E 0 -
►t k 3515 Mon ome t
20 AI,S 4693 -
ONTINUED '-'
_.:.• 221g Walt Leslie C O BA6 5571 Montgomery T C Mrs .i
sie L a L Mrs 0° -'%' N 24TH ST INTERSECTS p i,5 0562 '?..
ssie L Mrs ' E O BA6 2535F O AL5-7776 ''0t•
2407 Ames Frank 3606 RoL.5 Eug r
623 - 3607 Nelson Emil H O AL5 6750 }'_
' • - - 2411HovenWmJ O ;,� fi-
ch Frank V O ' " 2415 Vacant 3613 Mitchell Gordon C Jr O .
'''. 2418 Vacant AL5.7415 L •..
;155 2419 Collier's Masonry BA6-1912 3701 Zimmerman Ray L a=
Ellen E Mrs O `'•"•`
Collier Geo F O BA6-1912 3704 Savage Richd K 0 271-0765
1309 ;' 2421 Aliment Ray J O BA6 5033 3705 Clasen Hal R O BA6 6686 r
nik Frank J O u al Homer A O 3708*Ritz Audereea S Mrs om.
:�+ 2422 Van Ausd
:924 :n;; AI 5-3022 BA6 4017
Id Geo BA6-1737 `-' � Muller G K 0 BA6-3762 3709 Moffatt Robt L O BA6-2897 t .
-r t- C O Ain-5145 4
m Vera O Mrs O :f'•' 2504*Shelton Evelyn Mrs 3713 Baker James
?222 3r 3716 Grinold Willis
John G O AL5-9504 BA6 4339 g O BA61541
44, ; 2505 Kirkman Kathryn Mrs O 3 *Virgillo R F
t ° '"� p'I" O 3902 Johnson Vera S Mrs O m
d Jacob F 54034 Lowder Geo W i '
Lreroy 0 AL5.1034 w t. : 2507 Cullers Chester A •
O BA6S272 1,
ich Juliana Mrs O :As a., 3903 Carrolli Thor A 0° AL5-2938 �r�i� f
5770 ��`;:. 10 ne Jerry BA61924 gg09 Pitner John e C O
o Art L I,5.0294 25N1 2 H S aTERSECTS 3932 Shreve W ayn ' :
on Art L O BA8 9686 bault Dennis O 94 ERS S y,4%
Edna J Mrs 0° • ° N 40TH
3295 :;.. BA8-4894 0 4008 Fawcett Robt A O° A7 , {
' -w;': 2604 Benny Ronald D O
to Sandy O AL5 39483r BA8-2533 10 it--T.:nez Lewis P AL5-0629 + :; 2607 Boehme Joseph C AI,5-2168 ~
ilia Mable J O h=�•::'-' , MILL AV S FROM CEDAR .11
Marguerite C Mrs 0 i 2609 Vacant WATERWAY SOUTH
';;. ':'^ 2610*Barlet Mark S O'226.9449 1RIV OF MAIN AV S n.,
;r Mike BA8-6537 F.`, . ' �.
CI
T INTERSECTS &:a._ 2611*Ericksen Ronald1P.....1
i
tr,.: ZIP CODE 98055
er Wm 0 AL53915v 2613 Drew Melvin C O AL56 ,M+
,,.�-:
en H 0 BA6-1785rs --- . 2615 La Valley Wm T- ° BRONSON WY S INTERSECTS 'P,.'4
i [G,5 6378 ;.a.
e Dorothy M Mrs tY -:' 2616 Clow Allen J O BA6-6624 i2 .....t,
en Harvey R O .{-R` 2704 Hammond Edw 0 O "'+
4,1
45 S 2D ST INTERSECTS •..•1
ank n L. 200 City Hall BAS-3310 F-
°t 2710 Rankin Lorenz N O
nt Police Dept 235-2600 t,
ton Donald R BA6-3627 BA8 5087 Floors ,;
rson Eddie O BA63455 2711*Frankcle Edw J BA6 5171 s
t; .. 1973 POLK DIRECTORY H+.
x w iQ `'`y� �~
iY x {,f ,,, r {,i+.`{ ,'4,44"',y' yy�Q S.++i C b',,''1,� �' +"' v .� t.Tc 7"N4'{y-F'.,sk "`
L R i+,,r'.{_ s+ 411,-e... t i ,, ,-4 r h,i r.ra 4, R ra-3 ,t-,f—, ,-. 'y-a F '`'--'�v«.;a.
-ate;'..,-- „x .•,4_ .s' sry R..' it ` .,1: '; 3 t,,,,,was,'-,t'v., 'r Z .. �, ,., -tip•/ ar. 'K,,::- ,y'' 4
., N¢' •.•- 4'!n �• -�i !.k 'q 2 ty f Y }<t { 5 � .} ..� 4" it � t. ti_.� J
•4. �r•'�' ! ?� TR^s'3 �'' � R .y, e'" L rA ,�;h, ,r ". y,4'.. a���;�v ,.�•��. T�)�i'" yx'H�1 �+�'+ . e S !•
,
r ,N .yhF 1 4Y.. t• ,.1�5r 4'41',1v�.-F 'F".. ',�_ `�' `<!}. F fi5 .a4 <nN-ti!� 1 v • ` �
�i< 'Y,.a.,5.asi �y;rf, "? "b:4r'd' "' , '" , 4 y,.g f :‹a.t .-"rvv�V>�-''i2 'rt+ _.,1414 '•x',74.4
t. `n_ �y,,, k..� v +f,.`trt��'�-s"".- '"4'i i .,. 4 ,?J'S���,• . �.. »+1'F ti 9= ""' a'? ? T. ' 'Rr"
S •.< L .ni,,. rb .' F{-f,;ry;r ,,I _ ,,,,-..wh yyr.' '`$ ?'^ 'i``,,-' s. •.:L t„u�f ,E k{ ;:s.:y--r ..rk4.„."T 7. '. ,,..4 y
.,. # ��, ��.-�`� .raw ��,,}�r,,.r..� � � �'f ,+� ;s tr�ti„ � �k:. ,� � � r,�� "' �;��� 'fie ��-x i 7,�
- .. �4', trfi 4;7r`•:•y'9ai.,,,•;^,.o,�"t{.r� -�nd'.0 .iY Mu - .t Ytv,�i yy,'iz n� .*�:. f .+�•.tii+A• t :>..'^�, "x. ' w._ ,.}i�'.w�"-:1 .."vZ� a�`'
'-b,Y" r �Ntr• ,?7�..,1F. "F-��,r � 'w`.,•��,,�S� Y�C+`•'•.'' ••k,,,,•-c rd,.w�`�•s7� d� rj;� }.ev:iy k _nr�• ,T y '1, 't�' "L •r�s
{-,' *v
. ,oe : :. .. ,`. .,r'' �.. , .. -,,,„ :,..44'.Y w` ...„,,....,.,,, TT,,eS,-. `,.,=.. .• ,,„,-.,+ ,sn •�Tx ''"s Tar;,-,.... , y;t t
•
Ax.ite
te u+ . ' `.r �+>' n''.z ,i. 7- t, a� r VV.....S T1sr'i YF '''' '''' ,,,w? F' �Y '8 1fS r• .1�d; .-1-4�F�'"' }. .4.... •. a 1 -„,`;-k,
• 2. `�i•�- '' %t'�r�Yb-- ..g,. ., ^C'.��.� • "dam 4" ' +G� �Y1 '7 • fi '�, t,r�'t'"'�`,-Zi ,•.•� >-
3M^.•+"�`:' { e'�} x ..r �'t{4�a =ram .1.:,•. z 4 �4-1 t u'! c �c-�; �. -- i.
v.Fu ,}e�.�,":'Y. Y � Y'�'`t �!: 4 '�.•F��� �i'v +'yT.� fi w" '. �'t.� s t"+1'^.
1 • _ 4N�' .'gd•.., Y`;� r - z', �-4,7*, ei'` L1'` r `*{",^y'�, 2'4`G rr'' 1,Y+y .s f' '1'1w '; ,' 1.1.-4".• �`'..
t •
.'' • -,.t'w4 f,} 'a 5-,` a .rt_1"'�a." r-"f'U". A c R a LZC' ': ', .i"'�R+ R. -T..47, `:'� , �Ts n"
'- :. {^h ant r ti N -� ,}, 'v . 5 �'"��� ti 7� i.J'.ri f,#.'='++ ^,. ' nt c� � s'� � .0
.T t =• 5�,} s+$'J ,,., , f s A�i,,,70.zi_e +a y,.� } '1 0�i „w '^ l'i . `,
. 4 . • ' ktdr',t�,.J, '``i� . �,. 'n,•-''t 1`r0.-1+FQ,� .^' fr'.,G`'r 1.p.ffT:Z,.'14.4 �•.•1 _ . v1'+ a w> .Aft' �. ,t•A te a_ ". �'r..1 ,:- - �:
• �`,"'� �Y.G%:`M1�� ',r. v '�'I4` y� 'Z. V t. P1'.1y; M y1"�V•*"yin S,V al-ki,Y`:Mel\ i'i•:' /-T. J L '.014
AV'
'� }Y T ��'+ 1G f!i. ... r w • 4r- b �t4 .�'-+-.4-. .V'
: -' cam, ,r.� z a �',,-..•••,-- • a .n- . '�C{[:1. VA I. ,� •. , ' • -• "' tr 0 4 yb �'.v\
k � _ r. ,. �{ Y k�„- eel�y,• fi.��n+l,�s.��� ..�.,,}1` tr! 1 f�,1 •i �.��'�y •��a � 'Y
•✓ k .< ",� Iy�p'j4 .`''7`�'`" ,.�`..� Ail zi= • w5 t 4n,•�' ,ysc+'ii '� T"iSr`w •a ""t•. .:i7 . As-, t-c .
3' , 'b'., +' �' �'* ,k,,5t .�r{2,.1 .Ally y�� r k{• '+*: s R.+ �". , go:-�, a +(,. 'i v. ',,,' -iv'
, ig.3'- c . ,:w •-g,.L I o r ,,• r,�as; ;
'S�;•., ,'.'t;_.'.<, ," ;v`"r, t�•':,. ,, , '"+F,• '.°�4 - • 'cr'.'„tc;�r�.'• c" s •.l'�'.. � :3 '�°,•5...'�,'R. y'fil'1s "�4°i"i ,,.• .,�+'"'u.
k,�4C�,,,tia•..;�,""3''.5 '=4`.:-fa't:...'� v`h,.,• -, ,"',. •/',`;;S` �'-' r .�'�.g; .... :} �;---,;' v--t: ,+-,..i ,t_'e
'1c'di�"+�.. •: � ,k Y'n..,._, 3,', -5,e, -.',�.,r ,,,i,`v4w•y:•4,14_•' - S,.` .4 �", -5 ..,- • r?�c 't..<.i'F n- "'�;.. ,T;.
/9?J
t „ ONSON',.
� - • _,....... yr tfH
,e'il R'AY NE AND WINDSOR
WAY NE WEST AND NORTH
- - - IN A CIRCULAR DIRECTION
:t
180 4
CITY HALL—Contd 302*Alexander Maude r MONROE AV NE—Co
1st Fl City Clerk 235-2530 BA6-7968 414 Brown's Roy Auto
,s„ 1st Fl Data Processing Dept 303*Carlson Carl AL5-4966
235-2539 418*Merger Alf P @ BA6-1738
522 Muchlinski Margt I'
1st Fl City Utilities Dept 422 Apartments AI.5-2642
235-2520 101*Bishop Wm 550 No Return
e 1st Fl City Finance Dept 102*Stevens C NE 6TH PL INTEINTERS?
C BA8-3310 201*Clough R 650 Schultz Alf A O B
2d Fl Police Court 235-2564 202*Kirkaldie B
2d Fl City Purch Dept 301*Crossett Bruce 701 Reorganized uCh rcl
3d Fl Bldg Dept 235-2540 302*Galvin Jeffrey D Christ Of L D S I
3d Fl City Park Dept 235-2560 426 Apartments 711 Vacant
3d Fl City Pks & Recreation 1*Lovell llliam L 716 Vacant
I C Dept 235 2,560 • 2*Hardy Timothy W 717 Brees Louis D @ P
3d Fl City Planning Dept 3 Crutchfield V R ..ot 746 Vacant
235-2550 4 Hutchinson Danl J BA6-2088
3d Fl City Street Dept 5*Call Colette V 758 Vacant
4th Fl City Eng 235-2631 758 Mc Glothlin Eleanc
4th Fl City Traffic Dept 430 Vacant O A1,5-7360
434*Smith L A I. 762 Kingrey Myron BA
235-2620 436 Tomac Joseph T O AL5-0301 766*Cumming Christol
j 5th Fl City Dist Ct BA6-3511 S 5TH ST INTERSECTS BA6-3850
6th Fl Mayor 235-2580 500 Butler Janet M Mrs O ( 770 Fisher Shelton L C
6th Fl City Council 235 2583 AL53973 NE 8TH ST INTERS
6th Fl City Fire Dept
AL5 512 'lhelander Charles A O 808 Vacant
812
1 6th Fl Bd Of Pub Wks & Lile 520 VaBcant
809 Munson Eben L @
Airports 235 2591 524 Lemley Elvira Mrs BA6-1325 816*Jensenn Gene 22&
STREET CONTINUED 538 Du Bois Charles B O 817 Bowen Denzil O A
211 Phipps Steph P O AL5-4760 823 Fredell Howard
215 No Return S 6TH ST INTERSECTS
Vacant 851*Bates Gary W O
E 2151/ Davis Loren 606 Chalet The apts 855 Elliot Ernest L ©
217 Petermeyer Gertrude J Mrs 1*Martin Harold 859 Peabody Michl A
@ AL5 4313 2 Bonds Judith 863 Blake Richd L O
235 Firemen's Union Jzie al 864 3*Zehnder Susan 867 Mc Donough Haro
City Fire Dept Ste No 1 4*Backman Dorothy AL5 1110
ALS3333 5*Hensley Joseph E 226-1526 870 Daniels Wendell B
C M ST P & P RR TRACKS 6*Feigenbaum David 871 Watts Wilbur W
CROSS 7 Roller Richd L 880 Broeftle Floyd M :
PACIFIC COAST RR TRACKS 8*Dotson Michl p
CROSS 9*Burkey R J NE 9TH ST INTER
HOUSER AV S INTERSECTS 10*Best Tim 903 Torsak Stan O A;
S 3D ST LNTERSECTS 11*Giese Clarence i 909 Paulus Raymond I
320 Vacant 12 Vacant BA6-1905
324 Angelo Nick O 13*Richards Robt J 271-1890 910 Cutler James R C
I I% 328*Wright Anna C 226-1849 14 Burgos Lino 915*Harker Bruce O
336 Hansen Raymond H O 15 Moreland Walton W 916*Frint Ralph L @
AL53024 AL5-1548 Nugent Karen J
S 4TH ST INTERSECTS 16 Ferguson Simone Mrs 921 Blakstad Ethel O
400 Trottman John C O AL5-5941 A `L -4018 NE 10TH ST INTEI
404 Niesen David B AL5-1788 17*Hamilton Wm D -..,4 1, 1005 Noble Alvin E C
"" 404% *Mc Donough Kathy N 18 Kristiansen Rolf p` 1009 Lambert Ross W
410 Grove John N AL5-7364 19 Vacant AL5-4174
4101/2 Scholz Esther E Mrs 20*Frost Ernest 1013 Crutchfield Roby
BA6-4857 AL5-7781
N. 412 Apartments 6 1019 Broyles Wm O .
101 Kernkamp Sue A MONROE AV NE —FROM NE 1022 Luttmann Walte
Is. B AS-4061 4TH ST NORTH 3 EAST OF •
4 N-, 102*Corner Helene EDMONDS AV NEBthle
�• 201 Sanford Wayne C 1024 Bel5-9he 2 Luth,
'"^ 2C2*Walkden Arth ZIP CODE 98055 1025 Gist Geo W O
cy
203*Bell Joy 404 D & T Automotive repr ` 1066 Prall Edw E AI.
301*Yount Terry BA8-2310 :, •
; NE 11TH ST INTE
1973 POLK DIRECTORY 1
- cu .YR a + r r1, s. iCet ... r . •. 4.�. . e M a 9 1
i F 1i 4.ya1y ' ,.' i -- ''.• i . 1,-4, ..
.�. -✓_t l_y._ `_s - R Gx'i�at..-• tr 1a
•
:.;
747A IA
.` Y a 's T�2X v� �,�wc i ' J r 3 '�4 - ✓r•a ,"Y - a .ti , F' r5h is , i - •• , ,9.f '''^{ : � vq: - � n s
•
.
ILyi* '• �i �. � r .at . - a• c.,- -,• 5 -'' - p• ,. e , :. .✓Y'4S c " yax 'r1y 'rt..' S1 .. ' � ri •,•.., + V - � .- !-
f Sd a 'x iL t •
.1'6
s-. +w 'e _ _y% '"ft ` i ' .
•
�'''CCf'W • . •,t 'r • • '.+ `+ "- '�t•, `fT Y: a 1`, 4 _I s * '":1C- ,a• ...e dv. . ,, a ia 45', ..: a rc ,k a j ..--'{ . cr F � u�•` ,6t - � f -
rue�i 1p - zt ''"".7F �~� E� • k - t4 r - t."
k }a , ° ", �#vi S •s ,��T Jer:. ,e -^a y _
.� #a iH^ �.+ f Y "t --'1.,
0-
.At` ,Lx. . r yl s f
trs
's
�*' McLENDON HARDWARE Inc._ :�-_ :
SINCE 1934 I [2- • s•
$ i 'ii'_''• - Plumbing and Water Pipe •'• .4.
Hardware and Electrical Supplies - Pittsburgh Paints = +�?
E. 2.Si t� }� 2/ Sheet, Renton _-
, Telephone 226-2180 CO •
e 1 •
ECTs3C 183 y .a Cillill . �.
fg AV S-(.ontd co '
512 Thelander Charles A O �,
all '��farmeyer Gertrude J Mrs 226-4812 �"'
�. . • 255-4313 520 Vacant _^ -
tfi Ai rreman's Union Local 864 524 Vacant ;'z� -
.Ct�3< city Fire Dept Sta No 1 538 Du Bois Eliz Mrs O 255-4760
-
SC1tT]t ffi2555 S 6TH ST INTERSECTS y `
C M ST P& P RR TRACKS 606 Chalet The apts 228-2212 * � c===s `..,
f 1*Millner Elmer 235-0718 r '
PACIFIC COAST' RR TRACKS 2 Collins Linda n Z�r ;
� S =_i
3*Weaver Fay co f',-
tfYXISER AV S INTERSECTS 4*Thonanar David =� -c ;,R
5 SD ST INTERSECTS • '
5*Elder Robt - .
tl�rrxh Dennis L �� A - 'a-r= r,-=
a IO 6*Waters A1ich1 226 8617 ��
.% -,Slit Angelo Nick O 7*Hays Terry 226-9237 CD =
3/4 ?S3 Wright Anna C 226-1849 8*Coch Robt n -
r
S u2ymond H O 9*Cogger Tim 226-7795 I o t
10 Best Tim W 226 5965 ?a *.
�eyt 3 4TH ST INTERSECTS 11*Cogger Lynn 2
Y 28-0680 't7 to• d *p 3
CONo Return 12*Warren Mary J 271-2330 = e.
?t Of Niesen David B 255-1788 13*Brown Norman 228-2212 n - •u.��
4Df4i Mc Donough Kathy N 14 Knapp LaoelleE. -• -
't 226 4042 15 ,. .....-.... -7,.- • -*Casey Jerry 1'1l ,.„,7::::04.t.......,
.410 Grove Claudine E Mrs 16 Ferguson Simone Mrs00 • -
255-7364 255 4018 C37 • a.:•. ,,>
ept 4104 Scholz Esther E Mrs 17 Hamilton Wm D CO i
226-4857 18 Kristiansen Rolf GO s '
19*Shay Geo z ? : ='= q,T_ ;v
564 422 Apartments r = ti :i:" ..
ben 101 Dennison 20*Rogers Paul vs' ~
:mi 702*Gowin Michl Cr) w 19 g
t '
m) 201 Sessler Charles 228-1909
N 0 -� ,4.M
*Ward L R 255 8342 MINKLER AV —FROM 750 E 16 W o � y : i
• 203 Vacant ANDOVER PK EAST
"`>�
ion 301 Clark Susan N 228 1988 d
302*Suzick Jane 271-0196 ZIP CODE 98055 �� (J i' i.
Woo -303 Susa Thos ,,.-1
1 4``':ly +—,�r•
rat 418 Nergner Alf P OO 226-1738 6 w o p,a;!ji
..
422 Apartments MONROE AV NE —FROM NE r
101 Sparkland 4TH ST NORTH 3 EAST OF �' !
.102* 0....r.' ' .. ;
Thompson Adrienne IDMONDS AV NE A Cd * y;� ,k�
226,5438 = .r t"t`�'
201*Mason Ralph J ZIP CODE 98055 -. �.
` 202*Falk Roberta 404 Ja-Menca Motors repr �„� �
/1 co,C/� •pis j nie ; of
301 Part Jerry 226 844p 2310 -v' , ,.+.Nt
'11 302 Bendara Dick
414 Brown's Roy Auto Service 4,' "�'y a
,� Apartments 522 MZucS}�ilinslu Margto _966
� ' ' r L -~ �, ::;,� nsen Paul 2552642 Mrs O " `.e -
,"2*Webber Russell
3 Crutchfield Va Nita R 650 Jacobs Norman L O 2551818 a'• '
71-14 e NE 6TH ST INTERSECTSpit
.... "
•' 4,tStarkovich Steve NE 6TH PL INTERSECTS H • •t+1-
5*Dur,z Debbie NE 7TH ST INTERSECTS n t"•-
434 Smith L A NE 7TH PL INTERSECTS
Severn Jerryp 701 Reorganized Church Of Jesus 3436 , ;�•. ,226-2278 i�� ' .'
Christ Of L D S 22(r2360 ...s.
S 5TH ST INTERSECTS 711 Walker Wm E 0CD ,, ,� - ;'�.:- o __
500 Vacant 717 Brees Louis D O 228 1462 i. ;;
a.- 255-2550 Co, ` 4 * '
1975 POLE: DIRECTORY I i, ' cr. • ? .r t''.`K. -. -_
• •
• t , •
•
- -
•
nt•„t +jE4� t ,� ,�..v.if
'�•, Nam' - am^" ,'trs s ..-u-
•4046,
.i,. •3.. '. �s r,,,sa •�y+ -'s'�,' rr• '% �'. 't:•! .a.� .•4.w 71 ' [^',-"'' 'T '' e--Aa, - .0..�_ � '�y.,(� ` _'
,&� irk a �-
• w�� S' < � ' •,• t t r.. S.,' i {�� `�-� -'Y T ti.�' '{ _e) 1 .,t`-'?k Y: 0 4
/�!11
�9ys
•
q: . 4-1x Y c -.- , . -.S:. • y ..j .. �t, A 'h 'k ,♦ .tq..Pl' .fY-„
- '• -C Y ... -4 "'>d`s,a.� .:.- �k,'ry,; - . . 4 `t + • •'<°'14 - auF'��.i...�' .Si
•
• SAFECO Title Insurance Company
FAST, EFFICIENT TITLE INSURANCE
CZ d Fourth and Vine Bldg., 2615 4th Ave., Seattle Tel. 292-1550
N
292
MILITARY RD (K)•--Contd 4th Fl R City Traffic Division 235-2620 15 Casey Jerry
35TH PL S INTERSECTS 5th Fl County Dist Ct 2263511 16 Ferguson Simone Mrs 255-4018
24715*Hand Arnold W @ 839-8158 5th Fl R City Municipal Court 235-2564 17 Thompson Adrian
24718 Doug & Dick's Exxon Service 5th Fl R City Atty 255-8678 18*Kaliteha John
839-9852 6th Fl R City Mayor 235.2580 19 Shay Geo
24721 Thomas Peter D @ 839-1342 6th Fl R City Council 235-2586 20 Rogers Paul
24727 Benzel Larry V O 839.8628 6th Fl R City Fire Dept 235-2642
S 248TH ST INTERSECTS 6th Fl R City Personnel 232-2556 618
24812 Trike Set The preschool 941-2117 6th Fl R City Health Ofcr MILWAUKEE BLVD(ALGONA)
24820 Ireland David 839-7719 6th Fl R City Fire Dept (Prevention FROM 1ST AV N SOUTH 1 WEST OF
S 249TH ST INTERSECTS Ofc) WASHINGTON BLVD
24904 Kelsey Ronald G 839-5939 STREET CONTINUED
• 24910 Wraspir Morris W O 217 Petermeyer Gertrude J Mrs OO ZIP CODE 98002
24916 Harton Edw O 839-7835 255-4313 - WARDE ST INTERSECTS
S 250TH ST INTERSECTS 235 Fireman's Union Local 864 TACOMA BLVD INTERSECTS _
25030 Grace Christian Academy ech R City Fire Dept Ste No 1 235-2555 119 Anderson C 19332489
839-4678 C M ST P & P RR TRACKS CROSS - Bacon Quentin 8338519
Grace Baptist Church 83944670 PACIFIC COAST RR TRACKS CROSS 126 Rhea Claude F 8334472
Noah's Ark day care center 839-4670 HOUSER AV S INTERSECTS 132 Nelson Wm O 833-1458
25040 Morris Wm M S 3D ST INTERSEC 1b 2D AV S INTERSECTS
25921 Yount Delmar E OO 852-1952 320 Lynch Dennis L 216*Ogar Ronnie _
S 260TH ST INTERSECTS 324 Angelo Nick 0 ' 218 Vacant
26015*Waller Eug M Winget R Gene 235-1922 220 Holbrook Steph @
M 26039*Neave Ronald C 0 8544083 336 Hansen Raymond H @ 255 3024
S 4TH ST INTERSECTS lb CLAY ST M INTERSECTS
26061 Vacant 236 Palko John L® 833-4792
26201*Frey Lewis H 854-2682• 400 Vacant 239 Braniff John H 0 833-8471
a. 26219 Vacant 404 Pedroza Henry 226-9112 241 Caliboso S C € 833-0692
26229 Gilmer 4041 Vacant
meow 3D A V S INTERSECTS
26241#Jackson Cal N 852-6283 410 Grove Claudine E Mrs 255-7364 316 Mc Farland Albert G Oa 833-5337
26247 Larson Nancy L Mrs O 4101 Scholz Esther E Mrs 226-4857 322 Vacant
S 264TH ST INTERSECTS 412 Apartments 328 Vacant
26425 Findley Charles T 8527893 101*Jerni Margt 340 Vacant
WI O 2L5115 Levack Norman T OO 852-2158 102 Avery Jane 235-1721 4TH AV S INTERSECTS
26515 Pitchford Walter G @ 852-8739 201 Vacant 401 Cortel Ray C 0
CA 26525 Vacant 202 Vacant 402 Somers Silver B 939.0828
La-WI)
S 265TH ST INTERSECTS 203 Tucker Mary 425 Sobotta Albert 08334i475
S 268TH ST INTERSECTS 301 Case Geo 432 No Return -
Cm, wt 302*Alezander Maude 436 No Return
�� N 616 303 Susa Thos 5TH AV S INTERSECTS
MILL AV S (RENTON)—FROM CEDAR 418 Rivas Sigifredo 271-2840 •
lam J RIVER WATERWAY SOUTH I EAST 422 Apartments 619
J OF MAIN AV S 101+Hall Ann MILWAUKEE BLVD N (PACIFIC)
Imilim Q 102*Jain Padam P 235-4939 FROM 1ST AV E NORTH 1 WEST OF
O (3 ZIP CODE 98055 201 Lazetti Anthony 255-0220 PACIFIC AV
BRONSON WY S INTERSECTS • 202*Perry Thos L 228-4386 z -.
• 301 Hart Jerry 226-8440 ZIP CODE 98047
++ , 620 302*Mercer G A 255-7482 101 Yeager B C 833-6387
: , - S 2D ST INTERSECTS 426 Apartments - 103*Bennett Hugh E 939-3092 .
^1w4 200 City Hall 228-3310 1 Call Colette - 105 Whitson Robt A 0 -
♦♦ R City Police Dept 235-2600 2*Wittner Robt _ - 211 Roth Doug L 833-0817
Floor 3*Eades Ben '''• 301 Vacant
8tn 200 R City Firemen's Pension Bd 4 Jones Theresa 310 Al Pac Elementary Sch 497-6931
1st Fl R City Clerk 235-2500 • ELLINGSON RD
5 Vacant INTERSECTS
1st Fl R City Data Processing Dept 434*Dunnihoo Jerry 235-0147 400 Domenichetti Mario 0 833-2781
2539 436*Murphy James A 228-4397' 414 Ferguson Clyde E O 833-2985
1st Fl R City'Insurance Bd '•• ' S 5TH STn INTERSEC ' . Id- 415 Sprague Rufus 0 833-4581
1st Fl R City Utilities Dept 235-2520 b00 Jackson John W TS 'r 4...
1st Fl R City Finance Dept 235-2607 612 Thelander Charles A @-2264812,. 619
- lst Fl R City Print Shop'c•;'. L--4- 520 Lane Doris MILWAUKEE BLVD S(PACIFIC)
1st Fl R City Purchasing Dept 235-2618 524 Vacant •'- : ' ' - - r. FROM 1ST AV E SOUTH 1.WEST OF
- 2d Fl R City Police Court-- 538 Du Bois Eliz Mrs 0 255.4760 k -
t• - 2d Fl R City Council Chambers ^�- S 6TH ST INTERSECTS '•' `" 101*SmithJ B
2d Fl R City Hall (Utility Rm) 606 Chalet The a is • `
P " 102*7Lrner•Gerald 6 833.8754
-'•2d•F1 R City Hall(Lunch Rm) - (*Henderson Sherma -- _, 104*O'Hara Jim 0 939.1452
a- - 3d Fl R City Bldg Dept 235-2540 - 2 Collins Linda :: c- •' - • 106*O'Hara Lee.A 833-1766
-C`.; —, -3d Fl R City Park Dept 235-2560 - 3*Gowin Michl :'i` 109*Fewina Greg
.."; :.- 3d Fl R City Pks& Recreation Dept 4 Geffre Steve 111*May Michl
f:•? ` . co '' 235-2560 ' -•- - 5*Mason Jerry HOMER AV SE INTERSECTS
"+ '~2- 3d Fl R City Parks & Recreation Dept 6 Tisihta Jerry 115*Powell Wm H
tr '••- (Conference Ran) • 7 Wicks Bruce 117*Ray Bill B0 -
i \:' 3d FI R City Planning Dept 235-2550 8*Kal Heim Arth 2D AV SE INTERSECTS
�' -' ' ,.y 4th Fl R City Eng 235-2631 • -' 9 Casterilli Michl ' — 2D AV SW IT'TERSECIS
4th Fl R City Dept Of Public Works 10*Ryde Robt 206 Vacant
` ': " m 235-2569 11+Phillips Shannon - 210 Vacant
- 4th Fl R City Municipal Arts 12 Rae Linda 212*Richard D
«% - • - Commission • . 13 Moreland Walton W 2551548 WAYNE AV INTERSECTS
to 4th Fl R City Airport Commission • 14*Campbell Steve 215*Goodman Kenneth
.
Sr)
......
• 3 i ' + zetaed 4 foreeaceira . ;'
•N
4
N ` - - -';Bowl-For-Health"OPEN -DAILY-833-4146
-- -------- 1905 Howard Rd. - Auburn 98002 •
i' — __ 1977 POLL DIRECTORY • -
,..z,..,''.
f 3 AA_
•
tkitt1/4*.'' •
--Z.- .s`K.. ca-lAtr'LJta•l- ?-.... ..lSfn .l_._ `.;T: • ' - -- •. '
/41 el
leh,►
. Memo to JRI from Michele
June 19, 1978
Page 2
•
CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH (south from S. 3rd St. intersection)
1963-1977: Street addressed decreased by •6- during this
time period. There was no increase in available apartment
units. A breakdown follows :
1963 * 300 block = 16 (Includes one 5-unit apartment complex
and an address at 339 1/2)
400 = 13
500 : = 16 (Includes an address at 509 1/2)
Pr600 H = 9 (Includes an address at 629 1/2)
700 : " = 7
61
1972 300 block = 15 (While 339 1/2 is not listed this
year, a vacancy is indicated. Perhaps
a room for rent at 339?)
400 " = 13
Ar500 " = 16 (518 is no longer listed, but 540 is
new)
54' 600 " = 10 (612 is no longer listed, but 629 is
now listed as 629a and 629b. 629 1/2
is still listed also. 630 is new)
700 = 1 (It would appear they have renumbered
800 = 5 some of the same houses that were
listed in the 700 block in 1963)
60
1973 300 block = 15 ( 339 again shows 1 occupant, under
which 2 vacancies are indicated.'
Perhaps 2 rooms for rent this year! )
*400 . " = 14 (New listing at 414 1/2)
*500 = 17 (518, listed in 1963 but not listed in
1972, is back again. Possibly new
construction?)
*600 = 10
700 " = 1
800 5
62
1975 300 block = 15
400 " = 13 (414 1/2 not listed this year)
500 " = 14 (509 1/2, 518 and 540 are not listed)
600 " = 7 (629a, 629b and 629 1/2 are not listed)
700 " = 1
800 " = 5
55
1977 Identical to 1975
1. I x.c.. 1 VKR • ICHICAGO
1` * a R.
L. POLK01 Sunset Blvd.E.at South West Entrance to RentonHighlands R.
�` any & COC Oa Did or Night (1LRZ6 Sunset Blvd. �V.) Phone Alpine 6-32G4 o IT 0 1' •- •
al rg�vnr
MIC Burnett N—Contd 14 Z e m pN `
-
1I r546 Walt's Richfield Sery AL 14 Cedar—Contd ri •
CAPRI AV—From 180 Mon-. 419 Nelson Stanley S G AL CEDAR RIVTR PARK— !;
�a tare dr south 6 6385 1liaplc Valley tracks
ckst of p3 WC st ��,'
y CMSLI'&PIiR tracks a =6th av N Intersects 104 Kessler Wm T City Hall AL 5-3464 "M' o #
' ® 420 Fisler Walter E O
;� 10 110 Martin Merlin F O AL 422 Grassi Azelio R O AL Dora's Coffee Shop
BURNi:TT PLACE—From a 5-1093 ia ' �s
0 ® ,a, I 5-4348 Rooms: ■ 0 .i •, a
��/ �+ point south of Tobin to 2d av, 111 Koome A Frans BA 6-4828 101 Vacant -°i.. i • "
M i�r �`= 1 east of Burnett 117 Williams Clarence S @ 425 Vacant Z Ati.,
p� 103 Treasurer
t` Tobin av Intersects AL b-5156 426 Rice Nellie S Mrs O 104 Clerk = a. $;y,.'.
O 101 Bledsoe Joseph 122 Wagner Harold H O AL BA 6-0993 105 Police Judge I + 4
113 Fontanna Emil O BA 5-5410 432 Thompson Vere 0 AL
i o 6-0383 •
123 Donnelly Wm D AL 5 4947 106 Police Court
117 Pedersen Carl O AL 5-8863 , • 5-19161 ^
107 Police Dept ® � � i l
d 433 Romiti Prudence Mrs O 109 Park Dept ,
123 Pythian Temple 128 Aliment Frank O AL 5-6275 Recreation Council O� d � ask
a Alcholics Anonymous 129 Connell Robt L,O AL Water Dept �/ ,'
4 a Cedar River Barracks 5-3726 435 Plano Lawrence E G 110 Utilities Dept n' '" +°' '
4 44 C No 2093 Veterans of World 134 Barron Bernard L O Planning DeptIA �A�►��
s AL 5-3926 111 Co l Q
War 1 AL 5-3759 • 6th av intersects 114 Council �+--�
11 Welders Union (meeting 135 Schaeffer John G Rev 500 Favro Wm R O AL 5-4927 115 Bldg Supt a � >
place) AL 5-7232 501 Phurman Wm Engineer cp a .. •b�
Delphia Lodge No 12 140 Stone Wm R C) AL b 9521 504 Knight Carl AL 5-5042 116 Mayor
st (Koff) 141 Rockhlll Randall @ AL Royal Neighbors of 6-3168 505 Plano Phil jr O excavat- 4
.i Mg contr AL 5-2121 D, (Renton Highlands) —From
America 147 Garrison Dayle E O AL . 508 Telban Amelia Mrs O SE 121st north,1 west of _ ��
• Pythlan Sisters Lodge No 5-8569 -12 150 Holmes Jay E O'AL 7-7484 AL 5-3624 North E + + Jd•
' b Finnish Brotherhood r 153 Loomis Royal C G AL 509 Vacant 631 Bruce Gerald D BA 6-4245 -.- C4 ;f k� 11'"
Sons of Italy 5-5427 5091fzBrikland Jere Mrs -' 632 No return o Q y $
e.
VanValley Dance Studios BA 6-2612 637 Sims Ralph K G AL 5-7000 -a H•1 i
'g 129 Rockey Louise Mrs 0 ' CEDAR—From 1200 Sd av 12 618 Moyers Jas A G BA 6 17b9 i 838 Ersland Arth I AL 5 8518 oMIMI m U ,
AL 5 4218 south Roger Fredie 641 Moore Maurice I O ® vu_ ,
18 807 Mooney Phillip R O AL 519 No return AL 5-4380 tN o H 1- '' ..V
BUSCH PLACE S--Continuation 6-8830 643 Poff Geo A G AL b-7923 Ir o A -'
ilt of S Shattuck 308 Grinolds Manly N Q 525 Telken Lloyd A AL 5 2060 6644 Pierce Robt A O AL 5 7192 II" Z -.. t•',, .' �t%1-1
R 312 Busch Constn bldg contra _ AL 5-7070 626 Clymer Earl H O AL 656 Staben Leland F O AL CC ,i
5' • AL 5-1543 309 Anderson Margt Mrs O 5-6078 ` 5-8566 b _�
`� Busch Wesley J G AL AL 5 3764 628 VanMechelen Robt R O N
657 Fugere Orelle O G AL
a m 5-7777 310 Rothery John W AL V AL 5 1619 •
, Lip
$ b 4 5-2911 529 Arne Morris L O AL 5-0512sa 21:--;,..:
µ
662 Losacco Bobby J a •1
p E'. C, NORTH (Renton Highlands) 313 Beck Ralph P O AL 6 9656 5-7926 663 Naylor Lawrence F O o Mom.,.
—From SE 121st north,3 316 Anderson Roy W G AL
Y • c east of Sunset bled E 632 Favro Morris O AL 5-1643 •.a .r
5 7424za O & Ti,,, 703 Dewey Leslie L O O AL 535 Burgess Alton P 0 AL 684 Martin Clara Mrs W .- r-•1 •_
317 Moran Harold Fr
O i. 704 Holmes Ralph L Q AL �' ` 5-3725 5 3317 7pq Fields Lena Mrs AL r, -1
h N p1 5-7741 , 321 Gelse Joe A AL 5-4976 539 Toschi Ignazio O AL 5-2057 4t 1 �:
I o b 705 Whitmore Clive A BA 324 Monaghan Flora R Mrs` , i 5-3768 705 Massey Donald R AL --
�� 6-2895 `' 326 Apartments i 6th av intersects 5-0788 ' �:
g9f4'i ce 710 Church Dale E O AL ,'` ' 1 Haskell David L 600 Kohlives Gary F ALO ,s'
706 Lawrenson Alberta V 0
oo p Y 5-4763 2 Franzen Benj E 5-2208 710 Anderson Eliz H Mrs O
C� Z . 711 Schmalz Frances Mrs 3 Long Edith M Mrs AL AL 5 3240 (� ;
5-0352 601 Cole Theo C O AL 5-5834 t—
F v AL 5-0930 608 Caniparoli Dominic O 711 Zacharias Rodney GAL 1 f n
it dg 713 Colvin Bernice Mrs 4 No return 811 Bennett James E AL 5-2963 RI ^
J• Z r La, 716 PrAoctobr gv9erett H O 5 Kinner Rlchd F BA 6-0545 5 3047 • 714 Fischer Elden O'BA pA ice°""'
Street continued 6-5298 'mil t • 3
•
812 Usibelll Blackle O '
man 4 802 Blaker Randall 0 AL 327 Novak John O AL 5-8107 621 Bllimeyer Byron R 71b Bing Herman O G AL 1'ty ',
5-4906 330 Fulgosl Kath N O'AL fr7676 C1
> 806 McGinn Edw M0.AL 5-4570
823 Vacant 1 and
YI ' � 829 Overton Francis • 718 Carlson Donald E BA
„ii
it ? o 5 7703 331 Pavale Jacob
bamt Overton Mary Mre 6 4430
, p, 807 Church Vernal D,O AL • 337 Alloway Ernest E 6291',Vacant 719 Irvin Earl A O BA 6-0699Ch +
s .af 5-3042 ': 339 Gas ari Natalini Mrs G 724 Moritz Gary O
' 2 AL 5-3853 -, 7th aV Intersects 803 Breslan Donald J O AL W �'`
812 Winn Merlin 0 AL 6 2284 708 Vacant 5-8789 �f,
" 813 Vacant 3391,hEngeland Wayne J . 712 Pleroli Emilia Mrs
4th av Intersects804 Jerke Christine Mrs BA 1
810 Lally Wm R O AL 5-5268 724 Riffero Aug P G ;x1.
) • < i y.1 820 1?tupprecht Phillip R 0 400 Springbrook Mining Co 780 Rlttoro Aug P jr Q . Bingham Ira M O AL ��
w • AL 5-3329 a 4.: r a AL 5-5242 AL 5-3187 807 K N / . t}�j
y b 6685 # *'
d �` 826 Saping Marjorie Mre }�i Ml`' "''Plant A F O g Joseph810 Adams Glen R€ AL 5-4284 .�.• ."/
. } 790 Langer J O AL'
II , AL 5-4850 •,; 444:it) > 404 Davies Burton K tJ AL 5-7272 0 }``
.3 • ' ,830 Cheney Grant W G u, .= ;', .; 5-3882 •• . -. ,,};- 811 Poirier John O AL 5-5570
,�,i r; 1 _�
5-6828 '� 409 Cochrane Geo O 740 Caniparoll Rosie Mrs O 812 Edwards Wm T O AL •
1 NI
.836 Lewis Rose E Mrs AL 414 Chow Jimmie T BA 6-3982 AL 5-3902 5-6347 ,-
5-1015 415 Cook Dorothy R Mrs O 742 Schumacher Richd O' 815 Brti�nke5-8747 Aleda U O
, 838 Cotton Guy W Q AL 5-7418 ,. AL 5-5374 AL 5-9787 :*.
��� i i
/Y
ENTER MOTEL RENTON COLLECTION BUREAU
ENCLOSED HEATED POOL _•.- COLLECTIONS ANYWHERE
NO COLLECTION NO CHARGE ;
PHONE 255-1401 .- " I," CD
.r:„*, _. SINGE 1947
.3d Street Renton x Avenue, Saito 24, P.O. Box 272 (98055) 2554231 s`rtr 'I =
132 133 E e Fx r C i��h . O
.,..
2000 Neuner Rudy E © 271431 . • `AV S•-Contd S 6TH ST INTERSECTS ��
'1-0883 2001 Passrhe Stein © BA m .serum )-1 - 110 600 Hubert Wm H © BA8-1533 0
1-1822 2005 Peckinino Robt BABA David Oo 1�+ 601 Cole Theo C © AL5-5634
2009 Ellis John M © BA6UIq gban Flora R M C) 3.2) 608 Pedroza Henry © F.--
�_
338 Sr824 611 Mc Elwain D 3
5•7682 jp�tmeats `�(e 621 Billmeyer Byron R BA6-5323
a : ••• •
CAPRI AV NE —FROM to nab Frank) 623 Smith Annie Mrs BA65193 y act
MONTEREY DR SOUTH liDoaley Steve 629a Vacant N y+ M
ytown R C 629b Vacant n s, r"'
ZIP CODE 98055 .A Teeper Kenneth 6291/2 Vacant - H o
104 No Return 4131tis Ron 630*Whitehouse R M 'et' 77 n
110 Martin Merlin F © AIbif Anna G Mrs © --1 S 7TH ST INTERSECTS N tr eD
6244 111*Mist John © %Ajb8107 708 Erickson Merrill D n ea
•74 Nola40 117 Williams Clarence Nola Kath 1_
Kath N Mrs © 3 , 802 Fishery Danl S BA8-1056 al 3 — S
AL55156 AL54570 806 Rifrero Aug P Jr © AL5-3187 H g =
122 Wagner Harold H © k Eentley Donna ? ?/ 810*Halberg Michl 228-3318 E. (Mt
AL55410 Vacant 7 814 Vacant o`
L.5_2860 123 Donnelly Wm D © AL51i4 Gpari Natalini Mrs © ' -'- f 818*Arriola Dino
5 6356 128 Aliment Frank Lee O AU,3853 12 •
O AI S 2633 IDailey Edw F Jr
129 Connell Robt L © AU-, J tilt CEDAR RIVER PARK —FROM . .
134 Barron Bernard L O ICH ST INTERSECTS MAPLE VALLEY RD EAST m
135 Butler Bob G © 271.1011 .ate Melvin OF CMSTP & PRR TRACKS
140 Stone Wm R © Lteries Burton K © AL5-3882 .:y
55225 141 Rockhill Randall O Alb2311 Lilgsrs John F © BA6-0309 9 7 ZIP CODE 98055
147 Jay Gilbert C © A7.5-&50 `.kkehire Wm G AL5_1836 0, r 100 City Pub Library 235-2610 f,
24 150 Holmes Jay E 0 AL5-7 :-Qbok Dorothy R Mrs © u/5- m C
1 153 Loomis Royal C O AL64C ''►.-5374 4. y 16 1
ITH ST on Stanley S 0 AL5-6385 DAVIS AV S —FROM S 15TH
)F 1 4•-••:. ux M Mrs ST SOUTHEAST 1 WEST OF a) aQ
CARR RD (ALSO KNOWN N ,„„te• Azelio 2554348 SHATTUCK AV S rt S
S 179TH ST)—FROM 1PR7j 3 • taxiC.eo E C:) aa
AV SE NORTHEAST 2 114Donald S J © 228-2228 ZIP CODE 98055 CO int Ca)
6-2960 SOUTH OF SE 174TH ST • :•.pson Vere 0 AL54947 1503 Carlson Jerry J 321 r-
•••••ti'Prudence Mrs © 1506 Campbell Maude D Mrs CO Q
ZIP CODE 98055 ��A�Ib-6275 AL5-7652
= seam
10435 Kerstetter Glen © :"' lie Ernest J 0 BA6-9639 1509 Jane Ernest A © AL5-4237 t
•5- `67 AL5-6613 - 1,$ST INTERSECTS 1514 Slyter Roy L 0AL5-8509 0 co I'
10500 Real Estate One Hundrai. Patbahka Mark L 1517 Wicks Nick J O ALL-7604 ■m (B 1
24 1 10545 Vacant • ';Return 1521 Wicks Robt W 0 ALS-0647 " a
�� ;t>' 1530 Azzola John A © AL5-3835 eD CD
TH SI' 0 'r'ade4Joan 1603 Scott Gary R BA8-6988 man —pel,■
)F CEDAR AV S —FROM MI• Mlban Amelia P Mrs © 1608 Moses Geo E © AL5-3319 "'a
3D ST SOUTH _ lk.:T • ••24 1609 Wade Robt A O a
-•t 1615*Worley Agnes L Mrs 0
ZIP CODE 98055 +cant 255.7645 "'t
1-0906 307 Walt Edw J © AL5-770 - 'Uzi Robt 1616 Smith Philip C O AL55518 9 V)
308 Grinolds Manly M © • ' -• Lloyd A O ALS-2060 1621 Hughes Harland H © n
AL5-7070 `1'' Earl H © AI r-6078 BA6-4097 SD
309 Anderson Margt Mrs A Jim © BA6.9781 1622 Wilson Ernest B © .......
AL5-3764 y John C OO BA6-3337 BA6-3998 0 0
310*Sweeney Timothy t!dker Dennis © 1707 Constantine Wm A 0 = '=
i5-5088 313 Rogers Merle M Mrs O 114
_ • Margy Mrs © AL5-2826
AL5-8556 ` 'c 111„AS3628 1713 Paulman Peter J 0 e 4*
316 Anderson Leroy W @ : te:Winford K 228-4870 AL5-7361 '3 O .
1618 AL5-7424 •• Gilbert bldg contr 1716 White Carl J © BA6-8548
=. ±4K- 1972 POLK DIRECTORY
•
r, . . . .
.711.1.7.4.1V..F 1 i giiiti! ..•- •
I .
•
MK .,,. gE 44. .4?• T 1*yam ?', Y � ' S Y. • `p ,7 •
; D , •
*Vk
.• .'G;.t r_ 4- - '4.. r4 4 w ' r.:—. ,''.A.v 'hi;.&..f+..Y 3.4w �' '- - Y••y!�Fs.t3.i'� ^ . . .. - . -„..r.L
fgy1
-
"g;.
•
•
if r. 3
- .r..` f a �.
RENTON COLLECTION BUREAU y
COLLECTIONS ANYWHERE x `.1
NO COLLECTION NO CHARGE i ii I
SIN(E 1947 i .h . ,
III;
122 Williams Avenue, suite 24, P.O. Box 272 (98055) 255-8231 - Ora,
133 . I*. e. .•
IVA I • a.
DAR AV S—Contd S 6TH ST INTERSECTS ,
7 No Return 600 Hubert Wm H OO BA8-15.33
1*Abbey David O 601 Cole Theo C O AL5-5634 sE �r ',"` _
4 Monaghan Flora R Mrs O 608 Pedroza Henry O E. a - . t
AL5.4824 611 Mc Elwain D %
6 Apartments 621 Billmeyer Byron R BA6-5323 : Q• •
- _
1 Toth Frank 623 Smith Annie Mrs BA6-5193 r� •
2*Doaley Steve 629a Vacant I' (IQ
3 Brown R C 629b Vacant • n c
4*Teeper Kenneth 6291 Vacant tea d
Santis Ron 630*Whitehouse R M �' " x
o o
7 Novack Anna G Mrs O S 7TH ST INTERSECTS :",, m . --
AL5-8107 708 Erickson Merrill D v ro o
0 Fuigosi Kath N Mrs C:) 802 Flahery Danl S BA8-1056 3 -7:1 .
AL54570 806 Riffero Aug P Jr 0AI.5-3187 VI ;7; r=
1*Bentley Donna 810*Halberg Michl 228-3318 E. vQ •`_
7 Vacant 814 Vacant e
9 Gaspari Natalini Mrs O 818*Arriola Dino r C , • —7
AL53853 O
*Dailey Edw F Jr 12 • •
Vacant CEDAR RIVER PARK —FROM o ,. _'�')
S 4TH ST INTERSECTS MAPLE VALLEY RD EAST t .,.
0*White Melvin OF CMSTP & PRR TRACKS .
k Davies Burton K O AL53882
9 Rodgers John F O BA6-0309 ZIP CODE 98055 - ,e-- >
4 Berkshire Wm G AI.5-1836 100 City Pub Library 235-2610 t_{-•:�.. .
5 Cook Dorothy R Mrs O m NC f+- 3 :-
AL5-5374 16 i2. ,: ,•
9 Nelson Stanley S O AL5-6385 DAVIS AV S —FROM S 15TH
0 Lamoreux M Mrs ST SOUTHEAST 1 WEST OF a) r
2*Grassi Azelio 255-4348 SHATTUCK AV S IMP,
r '; - •
5 Matthai Geo E O
0*Mc Donald S J O 228-2228 ZIP CODE 98055 V .
2 Thompson Vere 0 AL54947 1503 Carlson Jerry J sue/'! / —c.` — '+
13 Romiti Prudence Mrs O 1506 Campbell Maude D Mrs O r w, .. . _ .
ALS-6275 AL5-7652 r•
15 Large Ernest J O BA6-9639 1509 Jane Ernest A O AL5-4237 1eO - • T
S 6TH ST INTERSECTS 1514 Slyter Roy L OO AL5-8509
10 Farbanks Mark L 1517 Wicks Nick J 0AL5-7604 NI CD
11 No Return 1521 Wicks Robt W O AL5-0647 irq" a • ",+'�.
4Vacant 1530 Azzola John A 0AL53835 y"'Ba CD CD • `'
al 15*Wade Joan 1603 Scott Gary R BA8-6988 me l'■ V ': . •
18 Telban Amelia P Mrs O 1608 Moses Geo E 0AL53319 3 = n :►`'
AL5,3624 1609 Wade Robt A O t `r}' • • -', .
19 Vincent 1615*Worley Agnes L Mrs Q '•.`. , •
191/2.Vacant 9-55-7645 mitj _ -
',9*Dark Robt 1616 Smith Philip C OO AL5-5518 2 CO/ ' •
35 Telken Lloyd A O AL -2060 1621 Hughes Harland H O CD t y .
h6 Clymer Earl H 0ALS6078 B 4 el SU t '
t8 Sewell Jim O BA6-9781 1622 Wilson Ernest B O NMI .
Murphy John C O BA6-3337 BA6-3998 0 0
12 Koelker Dennis O 1707 Constantine Wm A OO = = `3
15 Crossan Margy Mrs O AL5-2826
BA6-3628 1713 Paulman Peter J O e i {
Moore Winford K 228-4870 AL5-7361
10 Fraser Gilbert bldg contr 1716 White Carl J 0BA6-8548 O . i R
•
1972 POLK DIRECTORY '
iy «r t �. ;
;_ 4;
t • + - "^4 Set_'r - ..
♦
y j. '
3�{dA• ��.w"_ ..J..:3. ..L,.. .�.. :ai!`.1.rA �• _.T'+.. .. ., ._ .! .... -��y- �. •.A i y.� ~'• i•.
" - �,,f sM� - '" y{s W tr s. `� t ` r .- ' „"45�,3- -.ik ti. "+r .a
..*-. 7 4'_.,'. p. -3 i.2 . 'rA`A'lgts,. 'Sk it-. rt' y' '" .T�` '.LY-rt. F.0 r �� ,t
•
•
r�. '!• •�,,0'' AP. r '� ♦• � • � ti3. -" a•: 11'ifT'� c`� -fq"`q �'d� �r -.�'}1' AL . t .
'171•
�' Y'kgx.c y. 4 1:+'s.*t . ;„,,,*.„..J..-,_ ,q, T �` M1v
} •^�,f, t Ta..!,•qJ"" � .a. '% ,
-..- �� � . _- y.,.y�; zl ���.rf �;�.y, .a. h' -y' if •1 '
•
rr{{r yrt �,- j `1 —,-fr-i ...,F'' .: -'•sA. ? c ;; �t;3'` ;.
3
, .„,. „,;;,...,...,,,_, ..;....„...,..,..,„.,. .14,...,..i.,,s,.....;:.. ,i44,6,,v4I-kvf.i.4.,-...1yetAk.gr-,,,.:, ..!„--07'. -4.,,,,,,4,:,'.,,-4„...-74,c,-elii,....:!..1-,,--0-tri,,;-eo4iN.... , .
tt Z``r s y. . +s ti r l±a4r s�11 ��, i. z. tm r Sk b:
xh
•• am..- .S. f•., , ".
I
_ _ HUB INSURANCE AGENCY RENTOPJ
A.
Y
c,c,_c_.. ii C
7 E.c c$-..l ,,,,.,, �U.r.Y NO
e ,Y PHONE ALpine 5-2486
�� m~ Bronson Way and Park Av. N. Renton�(98055) 222 Williams Avenue,
e. a W ma 136 \
. !, ; — a;= 22 422 No Return �, DAVIS AV S —FROM
0
= c •• • CARR RD (ALSO KNOWN AS 425*Matthai Geo E O ST SOUTHEAST 1 W
012 �; S 179TH ST}—FROM 104TH 426 Rooney Roy H O SHATTUCK AV S
uj W sc .e AV SE NORTHEAST 2 432 Thompson Vere 0 ALS 4947 -
Ca cc g SOUTH OF SE 174TH ST 433 Romiti Prudence Mrs O ZIP CODE 98055
a 0 CC AL5-6275 Rom:
o r•GAD ZIP CODE 98055 435*Large Ernest J O BA6-9639,..` 1503 Carlson Jerry J
`0 10435 Kerstetter Glen Oo S 5TH ST INTERSECTS 'z=' 1506 Campbell Maude D
°C r• AL5-0613 500*Farbanks Mark L .= JaA1,5ne
Ern 0
lr•i 10500 Real Estate One Hundred 501*WilliAms Preston E O t • 1509 Slyyte Ernest
L O Al
10545 Vacant 504 Vacant1517 Wicks Nick J Oo A
' 1,k 505*Phraner Thesenvitz r1 '`.. 1521 Wicks Robt W O ,
111111$
12 508 Telban Amelia P Mrs O ' 1530 A.zzola John A O .
r• CEDAR AV S —FROM 1201 9 AL53624 1603 Scott Gary R
mib 3D ST SOUTH o 'r''
509 Birkland Jeraldine Mrs O 1608 Moses Wm H O A
cc 0 ZIP CODE 98055 6091fi*Wright Thelma -?.t%• 1609 Wade Robt Ae O
307 Walt Edw J O AL5 7707 1615 Jensen James J O
3. b18 Vacant t. 1616 Smith Philip C O
r 308 Grino}ds Manly M O
b19*SRint Pierre Kenneth ri 1621 Hughes Harland H
_ n:u.: ;,,i- AL5-7070 b25 Telken Lloyd A O AL5 2060 BA6 4097
E.-a -`E 309 Anderson Margt Mrs O 526 Clymer Earl H O AL5-6078
401
y "' °''� AL53764 1622 BA63998 Ernestilson B C
310 Cale Wm 271-0169 5
28 Sewell Jim O BA6-9781 r�'
313 Rogers James R O AI,S 8556 529 Murphy John C O BA63337 1707 Constantine Wm P
316 Anderson Leroy W O 532 Koelker Dennis O , AL5 2826
,, AL5-7424 535 B 28argy Mrs O k , 1713 Paulman Peter J
...--2.- . W 317*Draeger Candice Mrs 539 Moore Winford K 228 4870 N 1 AL5.7361
- . 44 321 Nygaard Faye O 1716 White Carl J O E
•`•' , 540 Ford Gilbert bldg contr 1717 Tegantvoort Victor
324 Monaghan Flora R Mrs O eg
_ S 6TH ST INTERSECTS 24 AL5-2889
• �',.' ? p 01 _ 600*Hubert Wm H O BA8.1533 • •_ 1722 Katzer Danl F O
w„ .� 326 Apartments
i C 1*Toth Frank 601 Cole Theo C O AL5-5634 :. 1725 Katzer Melvin E '.
9 y 608*Pedroza Henry O AL5-8130
,'Rt. d 2 t Ayer Julie C s_K
Z. '9 3*Brown R C fill*Mc Elroy Duward K - ;_ 1728 Hansel Kenneth \
BAG-6672
`,>` V � C �, 4*Anderson W 226-7880 226-4685 �-:
+° Y00' d A 6 Vacant 621 Billmeyer Byron R BA6-5323 w 1801 Mathisen Lance I
E r•. 327 Novack Anna G Mrs O 623 Smith Annie Mrs BA6-5193 pL5-2091
q Ah58107 629a Vacant 1805 Javelli Joseph V
a 629b Vacant f^"'
'' ' C C 330 F�lgosi Kath N Mrs O -pl; AL5-9783
f"•� .• I.
'fl AL5-4570 629'h Vacant -•�..f' 1813 Fairclough Ernest
+:< 0• A 331 Vacant 630 Vacant -Is:, 1814 Vacant
t; �` 337*Park Ual D 2285243 S TTH ST INTERSECTS t ,'.
t 1819 Howell Harry C
4 339 Gaspari Natalini Mrs O 708 Erickson Merrill D • ,
g r-, ` O.• ` 3 802*FlahRry Danl S BA8-1066
0 Vacant 806 Rifiero Aug P Jr O AL53187."41 t DAYTON AV NE —1
M .; Vacant 810 Vacant . ; ." 5TH PL NORTHWI
c ^a. •e► 6 v S 4TH ST INTERSECTS 814 Vacant ._....a.•VIP EAST OF EDMONI
;..> T. 9 9 400 Vacant 818 Dehaven Ken - '
-=�""1 C ` 404 Davies Burton K Oo ALS-3882 j ZIP CODE 98055
- •. ;„' .a 3 a 409*Rodgers John F O BA6-0309 12 -i 1
650 Nyhusmcen Arnol
ii i pi I. • L 414 Berkshire Wm G ALS.1836 CEDAR RIVER PARR —FROM '-ri, BA6-1857
= G 741414*Kem r Kevin MAPLE VALLEY RI) EAST b % 651 Jensen Max R O
s: �+ 415 Cook Dorothy R Mrs @ OF CMSTP dk PRR TRACKS -�` 654 South Nancy Mrs
et
AL55374 `'A 655 Walsh Patk J O
Cil 419 Nelson Stanley S O ALS-6385 ZIP CODE 98055 658 t Hesting Bob O
;.. I 420*Lamoreux M Mrs 100 City Pub Library 235-2610
1973 POLK DIRECTORY ,±x"ts
t 4 ,
• V • r • t t:
4..+n t" f t _ _ _ rya . ,...4,.
•
•
•
•
•
r `'- 137
hnCO �' •
..ar c.ri .f 1'
' HR RD (ALSO KNOWN AS21 432 Thompson Vere 0 255-4947 N 4.1.....c"
tricia433 Romiti Prudence Mrs O � '
A O 226-5225 'k S I79TH ST)—FROM 104TH 255-6275
t;. .V SE NORTHEAST 2 r
�„SOUTH OF SE 174TH ST 435 Large Alice G Mrs @ r e"; 7,
24 £ - 226 9639 r— t=^ r
—FROM 1 S 5TH ST INTERSECTS co' _�'
)F SE 19TH a' CODE 98055 500*Wingard H A C 2
EAST OF ' ` Kerstetter Glen O 255 6613 501 No Return m -- 'PL SE INTERSECTS =
�. 504 Vacant m
SE " :it Real Estate One Hundred -1 •L_
�,''..`., 226-1200 505*Stanluewicx Joseph 228 6709 •
Robo Rocket Station gas sta 508 Telban Amelia P Mrs O y - 1"i"-
ward 226-2960 2b5 3624 m
b.�� 2265413 n
CD:n J O , 509 Vacant -i.v Winchell's Donut House 519*Traverso Louis R O 25 —
R 228-5956 �<_>_' 255 9162 525 Telken O
Lloyd 255 2060 A 5 4492 m
526 T O 255 2567 12 Clymer Earl H O 255-6078 rut- •
{aIAR AV S —FROM 1201 S 528 Sewell Jim @ 226-9781
24 *- •4 ST SOUTH 529 Murphy John C O 226�337
1 532 Koelker Dennis @ ��d
535 `� /*F FROM 1 ST i�• CODE 98055 Crossan M�By Mrs O l Y
WEST OF Walt Edw J OO 255-7707 2�3628 o)
,111 nl. olds Manly M O 5 S THrST INTERSECTS228�870 --
Anderson Ma o 600 Hubert Wm H @ c) •
rgt Mrs O228 1533
i O 228 Og()6 f .2553764 601 Cole Theo C O 255 5634 O Ys-
ald J © 3 Sweeney Timothy 228�888 608 Pedro Henry O O
k7 Rogers Merle M Mrs p 611*Roche Marilyn ♦)
Ks E O '0-„"; 255 8556 621 Billmeyer Byron R 226-5323
Vrt+
Anderson Leroy �V O 623 Smith Annie Mrs 226-5193 -
630 Whitehouse R M �D
yne O 255 7424
K O 255-5088 F • Vacant S 7TH ST INTERSECTS OZ
r A OO ill Abbey David O 708*Giger Riley @ 2265312 'y
802 Vacant ^' > -
Mrs *Monaghan Flora R Mrs O -!
O 255-0618 �5 4824 Vsa Riffero Aug P Jr OO 255 3187 ~4
810 Vacant (D +
E @ 271-0730 -Apartments i 7,:;
814*Chriscense❑ Ron D 2280699 ;•��
O 226 0317 *dournee Kenneth 818#I{aw rt ; ` ',ri= :_
228 2587 S (even Barbara L 255-9355 Chris 228 31 MO'
2?6 0905 r'' Vacant €' -• -
,t.4 Vacant CD
t
0
ld t • Keiser Christine M CEDAR RIVER —FROM 12 err i
ROM 180 bKeise Anna G Mrs O MAPLE _••-�'
VALLEY RD EAST ,-_, Ord ' ""'`''
SOUTH
OF CMSTP & PRR TRACKS •
Pulgasi Kath N Mrs @ - i 0-) { t x*"--
.. ZS5-4S70 CODE 98055 W i '• �=:
2265529 Ps Rocky L 235 p¢65 100 City Pub Library 935 2610 i t -L4V:
tg
O 9_551093 Vet. City Lib Bd
r ;... . `
r} T
235-0222 � Pari Natalini Mrs O rr- - ', r..
x S ®
DAVIS AV S —FROM17 � ' Y �,�
t ': oYm Diane S 14TH
k)sd ST SOUTHEAST 1 WEST OF /� �' '„`
H O 255 5410 sa Frank l rr . -"
O 2551916 STTUCK AV S /1► '== `'
ST INTERS l V
White Melvin INTERSECTS
[GE t
gee O _ 3: ,.. ..„.-
H - '
vies Burton K @ ZIP CODE 98055 �.�<
Rodgers John226 03092 1503 Vacant „,•`
p L O 726 r York Dan 6-8 1506 Campbell Maude D Mrs = r •
271-1013 i Dorothy R Mrs O 1509 Jane Ernest A O m034
255-7652 cm
-_ •�_
n 1514 Slyter Roy0 2r 7 m �" '
255 85691� .Ned o�Stanley S O 255-6385 1517 Wicks Nick J O 2255 7604 55-8509 N C� '
tut K 0 O 226-3271 1521 Wicks Robt W O 2,55-0647 "°
255-7484 Azelio O 255 4348 1530
O 255-5427 katthal Ge0 E O Scott John A O 255 3835 0 yc 'Donald S J O 1603 Scott Gary R 228-6988 0 ,�17 R%'. _, 228 2228 1608 Moses Geo E O 255-3319
t
f 1975 POLK DIRECTORY i� •4 ,
c a +
-
•
•
•
•
ms-A-i,..,-,:.)::.,...:40.,:
lgys
•
• .r../rti.-..--.n�-...-.�.....�-... .� r+-.. �� .-..r..r_.Aw..►a.��.�owv..ti�• .,w..rwr.�.�•,+. -----.------;-- • -
ESTABLISHED 1841
�� t' fi • V/J co.:.
� L''• fir•,` , /�^� Credit and Soles Services
FOR THE PROMOTION AND Min �XQ thee.• Credit Reports
a PROTECTION OF TRADE •'• - - Commercial Ratings
III, Ir PUBLICATIONS AND SERVICES FOR MANAGEMENT
P.w$ !�- 1426 Fifth Avenue Building, Second Floor, P.O. Box 12600, Seattle 98111 -, •• - - - Phone 623-088(
234
- 593 622 317*Sharpe Thos _
cm
p CAMBRIDGE CT (KENT)-FROM 28529 CAPRI AV NE (RENTON)-FROM 180 321 Abbey David
CAMBRIDGE DR NORTH MONTEREY DR SOUTH 324 Monaghan Flora R Mrs 0 2554824
1• . 326 Apartments
ZIP CODE 98031 ZIP CODE 98055 1 Vacant
N 3901 Johnson Edwin A O 854-0468 104 Pierce Frank OO 226-5529 2 Timms Lois -
�3- 3903 Bartk.weki Joe O 852-6930 110 Martin Merlin F (I 255-1093 3 Vacant
— 3904 Mittlestadt Gerold W @ 852-9048 111 Decample Richd 235-0222 4 Kenn Geo
3911 Erdahl Lloyd 854-0471 116*Sizemore J P
3912 Neher Richd M @854-0753 _ 117 Williams Clarence S @2555156 5 Keiser Christine M
`+ -
327 Novack Anna G Mrs
40TH AV S_ INTERSECTb 122 Wagner Harold H OO 255-5410
+ cn 123 Donnelly Dorothy E Mrs OO 255-1916 g°� D' N Mr. �i 255-4570
Z C 693. 128 Aliment Lee Mrs OO-255-2633 ` 331 Phillips Rocky L 235-0466
- d CAMBRIDGE DR (KENT)-FROM 3822 129 Connell Robt L OO 255-3726 ^ 337 Patrick Fred
- .-O HAMPTON WAY EAST
134 Barron Bernard L0 ''-'r-S! 339*Sayre Ann
J 135 Butler Bob G @ 271-1013 rrec: • r Musca Frank
• t-1-1 ZIP CODE 98031 140 Stone Wm R O • .• -.- - S 4TH ST INTERSECTS - --
Z O 26402 Nelson Wm H OO 854-55760 141 Rockhill Randall 4) 255-3168Y 400 Vacant
147 Jay Gilbert C O 255-8569 r
�/� 26403 Hurwitz Don P O 8523657 Y 404 Davies Burton K ® 255-3.382
C ) = 26405 Corey Patk J OO 854-5279 150 Holmes Jay E OO 255-7484 -- 409 Rodgers John F C 226.0309 • `
C f * ` 26407 Gustafson Floyd C @ 854-2711 153 Loomis Royal C 0 2555427 -.- 414*Buckley F D -
26410 Waldow Roger R 852-4015 : 415 Cook Dorothy-R Mrs @2555374
26414 Parkins Dean OO 852-9338 • 638 419 Nelson Stanley S 0 255-6385
26420 Isaacson Donald J @852fi676 CARR RD (RENTON) (ALSO KNOWN 420 Lamoreux Kenneth O 226-3271
26421 RayGuy O 854-1975 AS S 179TH ST)-FROM 104TH AV
Y 422 Grassi Azelio ® ZSSd348
26426 Wilson Durward E OO 654-0434 SE NORTHEAST 2 SOUTH OF SE 425 Matthal Geo E O ' ''++
26429 Degeberg Kenneth L O 852-7089 174TFi ST
26430 Muccilli Marcus M O 852-6873 -432 Vacant
O 26513 Hancock Harold O 854-3959 ZIP CODE 98055 432 Thompson Vert 0 m 255-4947 •
•`
26516 arco Darlene M @ 854-3193 10435 Kerstetter Glen @255-6613 433 ROmiti Prudence Mrs O 255-6275
• 26519 Steinberg J M Photo Journalist 105TH PL SE INTERSECTb 435 Large Alice G Mrs ® 226-9639
8544839 10500 Real Estate One 226-1200 S 5TH ST INTERSECTS
Steinberg Jay M 854-4839 10545 Robo Rocket Station gas ste 226-5413 500 Wingert! H A 271-2889
CZ : 26520 Bergstrom Robt O 852-1743 10622 Winchell's Donut House 255.9162 501*Lester John
26525 Koller Roberta J Mrs OO 852-2751 504 Vacant
Z�!�' 26528 Schlaeppi Lauren K 0 - 600 505*Dawkins Fred. _.-.
CARTER PL (KENT)-FROM 1 NORTH 508 Tama, Amelia P"Mrs O 255-3624
CND O CAMBRIDGE CT INTERSECTb OF 811 VAN DE-VANTER AV 509 Vacant
SOUTH IN A CUL DE SAC
683 519 Traverso Louis R 0255�492
CANTERBURY LA (KENT)-FROM 2 525 Telken Lloyd A @ 2,55-2060
8� Z WEST OF 28400 MILITARY RD EAST ZIP CODE 98031 526 Clymer Earl H O 255-6078
807 Crown Glen B @8529159 528 Sewell James H OO 226-9781
808BuckSMO852-0345 •ZIP CODE 98031 529 Murphy John C 2263.337
PRINCETON AV INTERSECTS 814 Cunningham Ken
-
815 Womack Everett D 0 852-9409 532 Koelker Dennis
V) 3516 Erskine Nancy Mrs O 854-1927-- -_- , 535 CroeaanMrs O 226-3628
v• 3517 Scholtes Glen J OO 654 3696 81920 Kent rDePauls J O 852-5274 Margy
3525 Nelson Edwin OO 820*Demur Paul @ 539 Moore Winford K C 228 4870
3526 Seiler Marguerite Mrs.854-12808 852-7719 ' 822 Fenster Construction.geal contr S 6TH ST INTERSECTS
�- O 3531 Hjelmeland Richd OO 854-2924 i., 852-37 7 600 Vacant
3534 Teague Garland L 854-2413 Fenster Garry 8523737-+ - 601 ColePad Theo C 2555634
�' 608 Pedroza Henry OO
3540 Furda Ellis F OO 8544366CO 7 :-- 600 611 Roche Marilyn :
3541 Mc Broom James 852-1197 CARTER ST (KENT)--FROM 800-VAN 621 Billmeyer Byron R 2x5323
w . 3547 Ruppert Ralph E OO 852-3502 DE VANTER AV WEST s:'-
3548 Griffith Albert E @8529115 . m- , 623 Smith Annie Mrs 226 Cl 5193
a'{� t 630 Williams Clarence.- •-
ICA 3605 Kapp Roman J O 8525114• ZIP CODE 98031 :-'-r-r'•" z' S 7TH ST INTERSECTS- :"i�
W , , .- - 602 Mc Fadden Gary-T ® 854-1441 it �_y . --
: 680 708 No Return
CANYON-DR (KENTI-FROM 9000-- • -.,i-,-v"'_ , r`l.' Ii a); � 802 Vacant .E `fi. _ o':II.;:
7 1` RENT-BLACK DIAMOND RD 806 No Return ;- -
; _. .• F./.3i:.-"i CASCADE AV 6-fTUKWII O KNOWN ..
o :2 SOUT T ;-1 . - ; nOis OF 68TH AV S (K) (ALSO . 810 Vacant i. i_�-`,
o - •`- -- AS WEST VALLEY'HWY) 814 Vacant -... '_•yam .(:- yw
�' .1:2. — : ZIP CODE 98031 .-_ _. ..•r:..' -5iG _ f•,,. '1- s----- .,r- 818 Vacant •f0-- •/.Lk sie ..:b ic-.¢-- e.
�.. c 1267 Canyon Crest Apartments c-. .- ZIP CODE 98188 .. •-r:. ' :Al' i'-• .-- . -.
IPZWyse T • C. *Fowler S,• >' 2:...1 ' "" 18351 Champion Office Products'329-6666- • �T' --- - r�•"`a ri- -._ :,51
c 1*Webb G ,-- {i; l '"_��'1 4rr`` 18365 Tiles Inc jane morris sec-trees CEDAR DR SE(AUBURN)-FROM
8�1 -_V) cc
2*Wilkerson L' :J sst ;:.:: 2515290 =2160 F ST 88 EASP
_o ..► 3*Hall C N •• •-••_ -' ^ ''•b. 18393 Goldsmith Inc whol dry goods t .
Z_ 4/j 4*Zike D A • r••-:�' _ 575-0791 - :t' r ZIP CODE 98002 • --
5*Johnson S 1'- -
� 18401 Unistrut Northwest steel m'2b15130 601 Blakeney Ralph"V�® 833-4729
N
4 6*Sahli J " 18409 General Cable Corp 2515213 602 Gregory Paul 939-1252
H 7*Jones C -' -- - 18441 Senco ret-whol fasteners 575.0950 603 Vacant "'
8 Maxwell Ruth �',e•• 18449 Union 76 (Whse) 223.7621 - 604 Pickett Hyrum H-0 833-0693 -;" -s:
a)3 9*Campbe 11 B :. 605 Oswald Jim 833-8209 ' '
9003 Hillside Clinic 852-5650 - 620 - i1:
606 Bates Darrell C phys 852-5650 CEDAR AV S (RENTON)-FROM 1201 Sheppard Geo R ® 8339289
c 607 Baker James E !) 833-1587
en 9005 Capoto Jacqueline L- • • ' S 3D ST SOUTH - . .,.. , i,,..
•
• 9009*Peterson Robt 608 Lewin Alvin G O 833-9246
H - 9013 Chapp Esther Mrs O-854.2672 -► -------ZIP-CODE--98055 •••-�• __ 701 Steinberg Edw.,J, 833-5056 -_ •
9015 No Return 4 307 Walt Edw J 0 255-7707 b• a 702 Sutton Travis C O
N' 9017 Vacant '•� r--r' ' '-'308 Grinolds Manly M 0 255-7070 F. i 703 Coetenich Margt A 0 833.3124
• ,t 9031 Doherty John T O 852-7786�--k 9-•`.309 Vacant a li- c..e: L. Z k 704.Lsy Warren T 0 833-1149
' O ; 9404 Hudgins Paul G OO 8520137 . - 310 Taylor Charles - - 705 Larson Harold A ® 833-5248
r t.y r 9440 Assembly Of God Church 8525373�i''-313 Rogers.Merle M Mrs ®?ST7•.. cr.:';io:;706 Fackler Florence I Mrs € 133-1889
}���.." t-r-: *Barrens Delmar RRev��852-4120 - ".-'- -Anderson_Leroy W . 2557424;_r z£. 707 Johnson Harvey 0 0 833-1561 .
1977 POLK DIRECTORY
"
•
...AA.s A.
1
Memo to JRI from Michele
June 19, 1978
Page 3
RENTON AVENUE SOUTH (south of S. 3rd St. intersection)
1963-1977: Street addresses increased by 2 during this
period. There are no apartment units indicated. A
partial breakdown follows . The street numbers on our
xerox copies for 1972 and 1975 are illegible.
1963 0' 300 block = 14 (330 lists one occupant and then
goes on to say "rear is vacant" !
This block also includes one
address at 333 1/2)
* 400 block = 12 (Includes one address at 420 1/2)
500 " = 11
600 " = 7
700 " = 16
800 " = 2
62
1972 Most of this is illegible, but I count 64 .
1973 41'300 block = 14 (326 is new and 337, which was
vacant in 1963 , is no longer listed)
*400 " = 11 (413, which was vacant in 1963, is
no longer listed)
500 " = 12 (535 is new)
600 " = 7
700 = 9
(It would appear that the same
900 '� = 2 renumbering that occurred on
Cedar Avenue also took place here)
63
1975 Again, most of this is illegible, but I count 63 .
1977 W300 block = 14
p400 " = 11
500 " = 13 (508 is new since 1973. )
in 600 " = 7
700 " = 9
800 = 8 (812 is new since 1973; 814 no longer
listed)
900 " = 2
64
''` Information I FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP ' Seattle's Accepted Newspaper I can Rest In
' 123 3d Avo. Renton _ i
TELEPHONE MAin 2-0300 Alt The
At Your ALpine 5-345t Comforts of
1. l • Rainier Av—Contd 805 Bonnell Nurseries AL 5-4689 Rainier Av S—Contd S 118th Intersects Home
,� Williams S C optom BA 16 11439 Bryn Mawr Beaut Sho 11809 Bryn Mawr Tavern PA
t' Fingertips! 6-2323 P Grady way Intersects PA 8-0060 y P 2-9839
• • I i Zale's Jwlrs AL b 2b61 9th av S intersects Ca s Barber Shoe 12 CITY WITHIN A CITY
• •' " 1 Tens of Thou. 307 Almo Furn Renton Inc BA P
11441 Lakeview Apartments RENTON—From 1800 6d sty IC, :4,-
i sands of people 315 Fires one Stores (br) Auto RAINIER AV NORTH—From-0601 8 _- 1
2a Johnson Irene D PA S00 Reid Walter P G AL 5-3602
who were tor. 64 Rainier av north 3-0159
�!q Parts BA.6-0900 101 Jack's Airport Sery gas AL 2b Fuqua Dee L 310 Arnone Sammy J O AL
the meily t Dn'e 329 Miller Max Garage auto 5-9831 2c Swift Linda PA 3-6868 6-7673
�X to the City Dirac- reprs AL 5-1566 103 Arbuckle Glass Co AL 2d Layne Barbara 311 Trimm Wm C G AL 5-9880 €.,
• r
i tory are consults rear Miller Max L O 316 Dalaurenti Frank G AL - '+
330 Matt's Union Sery AL 5-9060 5-8629 2e Stark Marjorie Mrs PA
gques-
tions 105 Macready Lew TBA whol auto
tons itoi ondri►an• 401 Builders Mart bldg sups AL 3-0311 5-7006
arts BA 6-3100 3a Heslin Gerard 316 Faull J V G'AL 5-0045
l^';° ship, employ• 5-8297rlin111 Northwest Truck Sls BA 3b Vacant 319 Mattila Arne W O AL 5-7339 '
,� Nlm n Auto Arnold y
menr, sources of 411 Reiman Parts Co whol 6-3111 3c Vacant 320 Bardaraon Baird M�
115 Dan's Auto Sery • Street continued 329 Little Geo O AL 5-7587 a '
3n;t ailpply, commune• BA 6-2art Mathewson's Shell Serv,BA 11443 Econ-O-Wash The self 330 White Robt E G BA 6 5248 _' -: _ �W
coy on, ere. o also, 415 Motor Mart auto reprs AL &--- E
6-2965 serve rear Vacant
I'+'1 D recory usoge 5-7722 Mathewson's Rainier Tire 11448 Lake Shore Manor Motel 333 Bunstine Edw AL 5-7689 — Oi
is uo among Kenny's Auto Rebuild PA 2-3755 333%Tharp Margt Mrs G AL --
g AL 5-5435 Co BA 6-2965 May Clifford L i PA • 5-4344 °,i i
( ' regular suoacnb' 439 Yonker Sam Auto Sis used Rainier Trailer Rental 2-3755 337 Vacant
e`s cars AL 5-2551 AL 5-8118
Younker Sam Auto&Truck 300 Chamber of Commerce BA 11449 Dave's Gro PA 2-9770 338 Welch Wm P AL 5-4093
t•il More 6 rf560 S 115th 1 intersects 343 Mueller Werner W BA 6-3558 7-1
i i, Sls AL 5-2551 p o
People A►e 11458 Johnson Felton PA 5-6503 405 Favro Henry O a
447 Hse of Donuts AL 5-0717 18 11465 Gray Allan M PA 5-8531 410 Knott Ralph F G AL 5-5116
IRAINIER AV S (PO Seattle) — T
449 Moran's Drive-In restr rear Fagan Pete 411 Noble Robt B O AL 5-2463 H
1 Seeing City AL 5 4434 From Warren S 112th south S 115th intersects • 412 Lesmeister Raymond G AL U
• .�' Directory11202 Chas C PA 3-6849 5-2105 W
s • Directo Ads 520 Auto Bonnie's restr AL 5-9264 11466 Allen Emma M Mrs PA
i ', 521 Auto CityInc used cars BA 11204 Christensen Frank G PA 3-0514 413 Vacant
r! - CENTER
• . 17;.• 530 Busy Bee Rental Tools 11207 Mathisen Howard A" PA 11468 Hjellum Melvin C PA 419 B Schlosser Louis O AL 5-3378
2-1344eW5-3022 MOTEL Q
j AL Trailers 11214 DeWeese Jack R G PA 11468a Schmidt Ernestine Mrs 4201NVacantrn x
F Am rental AL 3 8836 S 116th intersects a
�„ 5-0151 424 Storey Robt D
McCulloch Power Chain 11220 Nickles Wilson W O PA 11600 Vacant
11606 Clever Martin F 435 Maynick Edw F O AL 5 7848 W
Saws AL 5-0151 3-8524 11609 Burwell & Morford (br) 439 Costner5 Clarence M O AL Your
f i p a 'b 640 Band Box restr AL 5-9040 11230 Anderson Robt W - PA loans PA 6 7252
• W 604 Joes 19c Burgers restr BA 5-4494 Beacon av Intersects M
e e a a 6847011611 Cummings Harold R Realty 500 gtutsman Geo V AL 5-1752 Spare
N II a 11232 5-389 Mulliken Jack C O PA Ba 5ette5 501 Kalis Anton G AL 5-7063 Bedroom rn i ►� 605 Strato Lanes bowling alley LaVo 11612 Barnette Benj T CJ PA'
11234 LaVoy Clem G PA 3-7061 3 2810 602 Vidmar Frank J O AL 5-3604
AL 5-1451 503 Petchnick Sam O
i 631 Rollerland skating rink AL 11236 Schaffer C E O'
S 113th intersects 509 Saturnini Geo C) AL 5-4109 •
• i 5 5417 11620 Schaitel Robt M O
?� ,.•.•. ",, Peltier Jerry 11301 Why Gro PA 2-9856 11621 Mattison Carl V'G PA 615 Matko Louis G AL 5-8035
Torgesen Thos A 3-3476 523 Breda Raymond G AL 5-9706 AU-Weather
I ' ;`a ' I '• o 11321 Bryn Mawr Chevron Sta 11626 Barnhart Verrol S G PA 524 Overman Jas A C°7 AL 5-7215
1` .1/� . 632 Renton Heating Oil Co AL PA 2-9384
yf .we b-1612 3-3348 528 Perala Hugo E @ AL 5-3086 Enclosed
+:, FS ,�' Skyway Mtrs used cars 87th av S intersects 11629 Shook John O 530 Stanley Edw D O AL 5-2281 Heated
• - ,,I ,�.•, BA 6-4800 11326 Bryn Mawr Beach Mobile 11633 Booth Harry L G PA 532 DeLuche Willard G AL 5-5169
' 635 Suburban Land Co real est Court Trailer plc PA 5-6397 3-7655 606 Boisseau David W .? AL Pool
' yS{ J� Harer John C) PA 5-6397
BA 6-2212 S 14th intersects S 117th intersects 5-3857
707 Seattle Trust & Say Bank 11401 Milo's Cafe restr PA 11T07 Cooke Albert E O PA 610 Faull Thos O'AL 5-3683
I . (Renton Br) AL 5-1591 2-9624 611 Cugini Alex jr G AL 5-1281 •
3-6781
710 0 K Tire Store of Renton 620 Vacant
j •
t •, Clouse G 11715 Apartments
Inc AL 5-0466621 Thompson Vere S AL 5-2635 Telephone
626 Postishek Mary G AL
`,:'"•' 715 Greenacres Court Apartments 11409?!•Gou e HarryO 1 Vacant Al in0
stt`.ar g PA 5-6679 2 Pyle Jerry E 5-5355 p
Graham Alan H AL 5 8251 11416 Lake Washington Beach637 Smith Wm B O AL 5-7052 1 4 1
" � if 1 Vacant Mobile Plc PA 2-9514 3 Deimery Theo 627 av intersects
` ' i 2 Dahl Elinor 4 Fitzke Delroy H
1 ,,, t 3 Volkirchacat John Randolph Ben J O PA
2-9514 5 Owen Hobart S jr PA • 700 Favro Aldo•G
4 Vacant 5-9629 706 Schmidt Adam J G' •
X.1 K s . W 11425 Trend Realty Inc PA 6 Shands T 707 Sylvia Clifford E O AL
k •` �` W 5 Vacant 3-0544 5-7334
` ,r \L •k 'c F 6 DuBosVacan Virginia 11427 Bryn Mawr Paint&Hdw Co I 7 Vacant 708 Kauzlarich Larry O AL 5-0285 112
4.,)�, 7 Vacant PA 3-5191 Street continued 709 Pasquini Sylvia Mrs AL $rd Ave.
f se 8 Daubert Henry 11429 Walen Joseph I 11717 Vacant
4StreettcontIcontinued Nonis David M PA 5-7368 11719 Vacant 5-4905
720 Carrico Joe C BA B 591911721 Car Caravan used cars"Pit: 711 Timmons Howard M BA
S ,�' Jenkins Dennis AL 5-2373 11433 PersonalityA 5 8380 Beauty Salon 5-2320 M
Helm Donald G 6 2585 Menton NI
I , ; , {j. F 11435 Bryn Mawr Barber Shop 11743 Gateway Mtrs used cars 712 Pr5o5583Charlotte Mrs G AL Washington
« 760 Hiway Fruit Mkt BA 8-2925 Charett Cabts cabt makers Ile corP RentonA Aviation Inc fly- ' 713 Tucker Edgar F AL 5-5788 \
Kersey Marvin N G PA 3-1497718 CurryWm€ BA 6-1728 s,—
Renton Key&Saw shop 11437 Vacant ing sch AL 5-1422
FOR LIST OF NAMES n U S 1 � � 111�. awe r .. � 1�1 trill
w k
• •
'= ANY TRADE—ANY BUSINESS—ANY PROFESSION AMOS E. UUS1 i.AND, Realtor Z �I a {
DETROIT NEW YORK CHICAGO 1 701 Sunset Blvd. E.et South West Entrance to Renton Highlands ,1 � a
..G.
. , o rnone ALpine 5�2rrt 0 i
.:,P , a R. L. POLK & CO. 1
,. a Day or NIFht (11925 8nnset Blvd VV•) Z 7
�� t , �; ;-
I rear 0 G Fix-It-Shop hsehold o.
Renton—Could Williams Kenneth T PA Renton Av S—Contd appig rear
;t sa 724 Fault Chas J O AL 5-4710 ' 3-4477 204 Vacant 12615 Skyway Realty Inc PA t
14'0• Una 725 Gigli Angelica Mrs O AL 11892 Wanders Mary K Mrs O PA 205 Klinefelter Richd L PA 3.1800 and PA 3 6200 CO =< a :
a " .i 5 5120 3-5812 3-0146 12616 Shaw Bros Skyway Pharm 'A o a
4 727 Gigli Andrew O AL 6 31d3 11900 Neblo Dorothy Mrs 206 Merritt Clyde Inc PA 3-2000 -a
01; O 732 Vacant 11903 County Sewer Dist No 4 1 207 Hudson Quinton
12617 Family Finance Corp (Br) co
.i. i 733 Wisniski Theo O AL 5-9742 • PA 3-9600 301 Bell Darwin �r °: a
• I •'� 740 O'Hara Harold G BA 11905 Figg John D O PA 5-0080 I 302 Vacant 12618 Vacant z
s., 6-5083 11906 Letcoski Frank T G PA : 303 Rayment Ronald PA 12619 Sky High Cafe restr PA .�.pp , Cl. �_*^
f +" i to 746 Jenkins Mildred M Mrs O 2-2661 j 5-9806 2-9911 +i 'It
J i; p Barber Shop U
AL 5-0629 11908 Nemetz Thos C G 304 Ellis Dale E PA 5 2111 12820 Skyway PA
'' �' erud Stanley P PA
Y� '� 0 8th av intersects 11910 Burn John N O PA 2-6753 305 Nep 2-9571
801 Ince James C 11911 Kano Yoshio O PA 2 4365 12621 Skyway Jwlrs&Sporting r
: � McDaniel Chas W G AL 5-1065 E 306 Duncalf Albert L PA 2 7107 Gds PA 2-0170 M
4te ; 5-7115 11914 Frederick Jos A O PA 1 307 Bulle ti M H 12621n Forrester Realty PA p,
- i o Street continued 2�1952
818 Under construction 3-4206 Salon r si,
4 Or 9th av intersects 11918 Ewalt Roscoe L G PA 12405 Vacant 12621b c Sophie's Beauty cr' j
tra
..
-, 4 t 2-1136 12407 Vacant PA 3 1286 - I I
` 18 11919 Taylor Edw W O PA 32409 Sperle C John real est PA 12621d Chet's Barber Shop n'
RENTON AV SOUTH (PO 2-3549 3-2033 I 12622 Superior Hdw&Furn Co ua i
b Seattle) — From 76th av south, 11924 Leaf Robt L O PA 3-9887 PA 5 6310 i
;, 2 south of S 124th 12510 Kenny's Chevron Sery PA '
•
rl 11436 Bowles Percy W O PA 11925 Young Ernest M O PA 2-9341 I 12623 Beachcomber Tavern
5-8924 3-0783 12536 Vacant PA 2-9737 =l 71
,• i 11444 Scott Rex 0 O PA 5-1727 11928 Roberts Raymond O PA t 12540 South End Brokers Inc I Skyway Ice Creamery PA = a I r
11458 Johnson Felton PA 6 6603 ;,• 2-9299 real est PA 5 3220 2.9.422
11929 Tasa Jas M G PA 3-1099 12542 Vacant + '
Y 11805 re wa Electronics telev 12625 Balcom's Barber Shop s 21' y y 11932 Davila Dora 0 O•PA 12544 State Liquor Control Bd PA m V i ^
y . n rears PA 3- D :. 12627 Kimball's Bakery I-�..
" 3-0844 Store No 590 PA 3-87187 5-1900 -o
Drake Larry D G PA 5-0295 va Coin Lndry PA way Br gro ® m i'
'M fit i 1 11610 No return 11933 Knutson Warren G O PA 12546 Skye Y 12629 T &R Mkt-Sky o
11630 Marx Ed ar W O PA 3-2095 3-8877 2-9641 E PA PA 5-2777 -p H
4' 11650 Long Marvin 11934 Berggren Harold L O PA 12012 Mellor Raymond12631 Skyway Tavern PA W m A
11655 Skyway Servicenter gas sta 5-7426 5-0935 2-9967
' PA 5 4665 11937 Murphy Clifton PA 3-6812 12015 LaFayette Sls Whol genl 12635 Vacant �I.wk �++ a , `^�1
s'a+ 11660 Ilillcrest Court A artments 11938 Granstrom C Gordon G PA mdse PA 2-1167 12640 Hoyt's Richfield Sery PA CC ( . ..0
P 5-2062 LaFayette Norman W O 5_29532 G
f 1 Johnson Alf F PA 5 2230 11942 Jensen Otto C G PA 5-4796 12016 Roberts Phil O PA 3-0609
2 Mountain Thos 12001 Bailey David G G'PA 3-6229 12022 Ross Albert B G PA 3 2152 12643 MFM Elec Co contrs = 04
I� 3 Mattson Gordon C PA PA 3 3501 0 rYl I # ,
12005 Bower Richd G C� PA 3-8310 12025 Pe[roli Pete M O'PA 5-4584
A 5-2234 12006 Schukar Duane R O PA 12026 Osthus Norman E O PA 12645 Commercial Sign Coril
$ •
0 4 Gawle Alonzo PA 3-5621 3-6188 12647 Skyway Laundromat P o ` + •
G"t: U 5 Seabright Chester F jr PA • 12011 Stephens H 0 O PA ( 12028 Olsen Donald G O PA 12G49 Aero Real Eat PA 3-8141 ,
s'' ' k. F 5-0803 P3-OG41 12661 Owen Hendry Drug PA is
3-6544 i� tri4 Y y o 6 Moore Sam 12049 Holmgren Geo A G PA 12029 Hcrschleb Roy B O PA 2-3278 s j";'
,4 rt: �) V 8 7 Hilgar Wm K PA 2-7470 5-9164 3-3A07 12663 MacDougall Howard L phy m 1
M O " 8 Davenport Harold 12062 Baughman Ralph M PA 12030 Klabo Theo G G PA PA 3-5050 �,
D 9 Shivel Joseph I 5 2896 12667 Kenny's Signal Sery PA (� 1 ..
2-4696 v t N o �+ 10 Kay J 3-8251 Smith Thos H O PA 5 4796 florists O
0 11 Butler David PA 6 3084 12055 Inks Lawrence L G PA 12033 12705 Idea House The
t 2-5390 ]2034 Chan Robt A O PA 5 8708 N V i,
ing re 12 Branchflower Rosabelle 12058 Fosnaugh Grinnell B O j 12038 Price Brian R O PA PA 3 1354
j Y Mrs 12061 No return 6-4812 12706 Vacant '
�' it W z u 14 Packard Allen M PA 2-8418jrPA aan Donald E dentist pc iI `2
12084 Helret Ronald E G PA 1 12039 5-4812 on Chas E j O 12712 Comp s� 1
•
�I m mb 15 DeWinter Chas 5-5137 3-5846 PA 3-3987 �1
1, 16 Broten Susan E Mrs PA 12042 Waller L A G PA 2-4903 Stone Lawrence A dentist m
12067ii Blair E J PA 2-2687 PA 3-3987 4
613491 72043 Carlson Stanley W O�PA �
12070 Laurk Marion L Mrs O PA wa Park Beauty Salon
Az II lila 'u� 17 Bader Ross 5-5529 3-010 Harper Clyde PA 6 5369 12714 Sky Y -
e_p ;, N � . g 18 Hogman H 12073 Rock Craig M n 12046 Y PA 3-7478
rr, 25 19 Klinger C 12076 Wintermyer Chas E O PA jjj 12648 Davenport's Martinizing 12721 V.7acant • - y
a �., N clns PA 3 6880 12724 oulon Jas O PA 3 5983
9
9[� > 20 Olson Donald 5-4858 I A Sery PA ` ', ` .
+ Z 21 Peterson Kurt Jr PA 3-8579 12082 Morgan Richd W e PA 12561 Dave's Flying 12727 &G Ceramics PA 3 3102 t,
I 22 Norton Frank V PA 6 5493 3-1881 i 2-inte rear Greene Geo E O ! 4; r
S 126th Intersects a-
Street continued 12401 Apartments12740 Johnson Donald L O I'A W a .—
0 0 ►� 11670 Seresun Mike PA 2-8973 1 Vacant 12600 Market. Basket Store No 2
;i* Z Z $ Z 5b 110.80 Marinich Wm C) PA 2-8104 ; 2 Williams Henry PA 2-5527 ( gro PA 2-7G00 12741 O'Brien John J PA 6 5986 a
'' O h e 11800 Skyway Methodist Church 8 Roginskl Jack Jr t 12002 F & W Ten Cent Store 127411/Evertt Frieda G PA Q 5
m .i.e
PA 2-8700 4 Manley Richd A PA 5-8708 variety PA 2-7600 5-2660 l ,
12003 Skyway Texaco PARoyal S O'PA
11819 Skyway Park Bowl bowling 101 Thompson Ralph 12742 Highland e
"�` r' * 414 1 v PA 3-4224 102 Vacant 2-9736 2-3698
11840 Skyway Lbr Co Inc PA 103 Schultz David IV PA 2-2008 12609 Nicholas Business&Tax 12743 Stamey Dorothy M G PA �'
+'% . MI 5-8350 104 Croyle Roberta P Mrs PA Sery blc g sery PA 5 4730 '
•, Strong Robt C lwyr PA 3-9221
11883 Zemanck Frank R PA 3-4121 i 12747 Norris Wm H PA 2-4465 ' �t
i ® �^ 3-1322 201 Johnson Karyn PA 5-0148 6 4730 I 12750 Bruce Norman O PA ' I'. vt?
11890 Topsy-Turvy-Day Nursery, i.,202 Walker Annetta R PA 5-7043 12610 Skyway Clns PA 3-196 3-2245
..___� , y ,oR,v rt vwnv Shoe rear i is
CITY CENTER MOTEL RENTON COLLECTION BUREAU
ENCLOSED HEATED POOL COLLECTIONS ANYWHERE u all ,
�' � a, NO COLLECTION NO CHARGE I• • ',,� ,,t `r t a• `
0 o t �.�'/iiiii/pi PHONE 255-1401 StN�Et�r �;; ``� • r ;
I '-, P/7Wt"1 112 S.3d Street Renton Nall . Q7 Williams Avenue, Suite 24, P.O. Box 272 (98055) 255.8231 I M ^,� {
Ma 186 y 187 �i 'i 4'+d •
"�' 12 620 Jones Fug 1l I I'''''
, III • '
stt eg • REDMONI) AV NE--Conttl 100b Quisentwrry Cindy Alta �, r.. '
N 664*Bundinich Andy BAB-6853 IL"r1UN AV 9 —FROM 1314 tI 621 IIroiletla I atk H ® ALb 1284 �� , ,r;s
0 667*Higgins Pam Mrs 1006 Gitchel Earl O BA84061 ! nH ST NOR'1liWt:9'1' 626 SmithPostlshek Mary (� ALb b3$b i't *•
• U. 627 Wm B @
J O 0 668 Vacant 1009 Whelan Dennis @ AIb11111- '
671 Robberstad Ralph J BA6-5215
$P CORE 98055 ° 700 Favro Aldo O ALb b604 �• II:s1012 Walther Harold HA434�!„ Callen Fred C O AL5 7686 706*Beres D E 3 .�• '■ 672 Goll Adam A AL5-0287
to 1013 Matanski Larry ® BA6 5 e 3 "i,,
N 675 Vacant Hurt James R O BA6 2918 707 Sylvia Eug F BA6�29b c o .`� {, '
NE 10TH CT INTEIISECTfl .',F Trimm Wm C O BA8 2470 708 Kauzlarich Violet Mrs O a
u 676 Weber Herbert BA6 4306M l
•f A 1020 Feighner Geo D G BA1►OitM' Delaurenti Frank O AL6-7006 AL5-0285 -`, CI ' TG" s �.`
W V I 679*Lon ie Eliz re r
l N 0 1026 Mead Verl C O BA8.34>f1 .< Sparrow Jack M BA6-5827 709 Wheaton Eleanor — •4/f es.
a 0 IA .0 680 Canna Robt O '' { It'' ;
W c/ a" d 683 Revert Howard R O 1028 Jones Jack J O BA13 4 43 •4'` , Beans Sheridan C e 711 Timmons Howard M 33 x t�
�i BA6-0744 1032 Gitchel Ralph L ® BA41Y1#7• A 263 0 712 Provin Charlotte M Mrs O ' r + A
684 Erickson David K BA6-9129 1033 Slower Patk D ® 2714111 > Baniarson Baird M O AL5-5583 re o >� , 4
■Z Bock Ralph P O AL5-9656 713 Thompson e••+�
687 Conley Harold BA6-2425 1036 Young Frank C ALbbbl7 p 37 3 r• •N
688 Crozier Hugh T O BA6 4647 ° Little Geo O AL5-7587 718 Vacant y
', Q g 1040 Grant Wm J O BAB-0Wl ' ."�
691*Lineberger Joel G O 1044 Froelich Robt H BABA"; wh'� Robt E © BA6-5246 801 GVac Rose M ALb 6120 VQ n. . s
.wYc Pherson Wayne G 804 Vacant o '11e
i', N O d 271-0725 O �1'i'
i /y �, 1048 Huff E Leon BA8-69(A ':.. Tharp Margt Mrs 0° 807 Gigli Andrew O AL5-3163 S [� r, '?U'
M 692 Brown Claude F BA6-3972 +
;�, 1049*Smith J B O 228-bbW AL5-4344 808 Bergh Helen Mrs BA6-2747 C� U �p �;, �=
ow rr 696 Carlton Lewis D O ALb 27bb 1050 Roland Carl H ALS-U$ Welch Wm P ALb 4093 811 Mountjoy James W @ w y �I, vl
a NE 7TH ST INTERSECTS , ▪ a P4 ! `l+ f
�) 10b2*Ramon Kathleen 26633M <oraker Ellie S ALb 7394 o H id r i 2r
7b1*Swartz Robt E r •' "; 765*Jensen Roy255-5383 1055*Williams Danl L Rev hero Eugenia Mrs O 812*O'Hara Harold 4i q 1 i•1ti'�+ . " ,'i
I. 1'k
228-5348 '' AL5-7222 814 No Return 'EI t •t.
759 Holmquist Douglas E O Knott Ralph F O AL6-5116 8154 Newell John 0 BA6 8078 x ,:1 :,i
S'ii 760 Van Vleet Gene E O1059 Dotson Gary D AL6- Anderson Michl W O816 Broadbent Gordon H Oa `'� + 'BA6 160b 1066 Richards James E 0 ' T1.•, '.` -' i :;' BA8 3106 BA6 9697763 Vacant ALb 3944 ., .,- (esmeister Raymond O S 9TH ST INTERSECTS y Ca i yh=
I 764 A:elson Opal S Mrs 0° 1067 Brunette Leonard J O o N, !n rSh4.e
1 ALb-2105 918 Mc Cutcheon Michl O 1 ¢
Where AL50844 BA6 1249 Schlosser Jack H O AL5-0852 922 Vacant t.!'` •
G T67 Petersen Robt BA6-2762 o r-( I 1 1II f'I' 770*Banask Thor O 226-7229 1072 Chatham Edw L O A1biF1�;• $�zarini Nice C Mrs Oo �QY 1073 Serpe Meivin J O Al b4t111 AL5 3378 . „18 , !TO771 vacant ; ▪ PF l y `I 777 Hansen G L O BA6 1109NE 10TH PL ST INTERSWIl , Rogers Claude P O ALb-2070 S 116TH PL INTERSECTS
NE 8TH PL INTERSECTS NE 11TH ST INTERSECTS CRY Edw A BAG-6463 11410 Vacant CD
(, Kane Charles L AL5 6b46 11433 Brooks John '' •"' + �'
803*Kenney Barb 271-0898 1105 Bonwell Francis E ® 1- Y ° Z. ^
'. BUY? est
Yap-lick Edw O AL5-7648 11436*Rodredosvich Frank 0
809 Howell Marion L O BA6-8767 AL5-2859 v; �1
Coetner E Edna Mrs O 11444 Byers Judy Mrs SP2-0764 / 'i, r '7 '
815 Campbell Douglas L O 1111*Hodde Edw BA8-6067 AL5-4255 11458 Johnson Feldon it ;1 fI • s
Consult BA8-0485 1112*Gardner James D ® "�'�' i, 1.
'le7 Yidmar John F O 271-0504 11464 Jourdan Roy H Jr 0 .,a ly� fir' y
834 Dahlstrom Edwin O AL6-0094 .,� { '
226 2728 -4• Melia Mary Mrs 0 AL5-7063 69TH PL S INTERSECTS CI a I {III ""
1?60 Darrow David A O BA6 b146 1114 Smith Ruth Mrs BA61�011 Varner Frank J O ALG3604 11605 Vacant 4' 1, ' < � • V
851 Ryan Marlene Mrs AI.61419 '. { 4
the1116 Wendorff Bruce F 60 p, Petchnick Sam 0 11610 Roberts Emmelie SP2-0442 "� ,
854 Fisher SallyMrs O BA6-5499 e■.s +TIN I =
Classified 8b6 Brown Roger L O Ahb 3871 BA6-5304 Serturnini Geo AL5-4109 Bagger Len SP2-2611 ■I ri r�+ '1�; :
'� 0 1118 Conyac Arth E 0° AL64ill�v Yatko Louis O AL5-8035 11630 Davidson Dennis Oo r. g 1 ' [u'
t' 858 Olson Charles D O BA6 2112 Freda Raymond O AL6 9706 SP2-4729 '■"� � 'I � 3�
Business 859*Baines Murra O BA8-1093 1119 Hurter H Donald 4 Y
Y ° .. Herman Marie T Mrs O 11641 Clifford Gladys L Mrs O 0 } s 1 "
1, 6 862 Nelson Paul W O BA6-7837 Al b 0646 1"' BAtr6934 ,:1 .' . i
863 Yankee Francis R © 1124*Van D 6rford Lucille )411 ,..p. SP2-0629 i[ �� . �R C
j Lists P.roia Hugo E 0 AI.5-3086 116b0 Irish Evelyn Mrs O v+lt gala
,,.:.
BA6 2867 228 6676Stanley I dw D O AL6 2281 SP2-1237 I!,igl 'arch .•I ', �Q�
866 Francis Doran R O BA6-2013 1151 Thiele Claude H O AL6lt�. * tee'
In 872 Boey Harold Hurakainen John O ALbb169 11655 Skyway Exxon Service �y h q }t;� � i" .;:
1156 Holmes Kenneth J 0 Gilroy Patricia Mrs O 772-0660 ■■ii 4� ( r\��1 3M+
NE 9TH ST INTERSEC IA O •
11656 Albertson's Grocery (Skyway d „i ' --- M �
ALb 710b BAB 2933 0 f , ,
This 906*Christensen Norman 1166 Salin Odell 0 228 4854 Soiaaeau Eliz Mrs O Pk Br) SP2-1660 = (i' t1 �+ °�s ' r r 10'+
228-3519 ` �,
1159 Olson Vergil H 0 BA6-600 AL5-38b7 68TH AV S INTERSECTS t�i ; ° . ►+ ^ ''
Iil t A Directory 912 Fife Dennis O BA6-1808 — I , yt+' 1 '4'Sr
ll 1160*Hawk C Mrs - mull Kathryn A Mrs 0° 11660 Hillcrest Court Apartments 0 ' Gi�� 4 �
916 Cantu Evaristo O BA6-09291= 'I, •;
'• 978 Vetter Mark 1163 Slater Alf K O BABblal ALS3680 SP2-1237 ''_ I }t`, r R�z ,
-- ., N Qiaini Ain', _ir eat AT r._l Ool 1 r..l....,.... AI con lG/o r
4.
, :K. .:gpe Fs ,,n1 •year G }:,.r F eW :.. 1 `k. .Apt.4 ., ,• ,tag •r.. :..C.: Y,
.'F' S•.�a�' J��1•�'?`-4 ._R ''yisY •Yp,..
q -4, ,�- . fps.
_ .. • N
•
•
1 <<i; L ,r� HUB INSURANCE AGENCY - RENTON
'" a" """"' PHONE ALpine 5-2486
Bronson Way and Park Av, N.
C, at
Renton(98055) 222 Williams Avenue, ;
200
E 1 W W
ell O -- oac
W 12 611 Cugini Alex RENTON AV
C ar H z �3 R NTO NORTHWEST 1314 S 620 Jones Eug BJOO AI51281 11660 Hillcreat CourtnAp
'� • W u, 0 621 Broilette Patk H O AL5 1284
SPZ 1237
U+ ,¢ =z: ZIP CODE 98055 626 Postishek Mary O AL�,5355 1 Johnson Al SP2 1
4 • F o s o¢ 300*Callen Fred C O ,A 7 627 Smith Wm B O 2*Ayde Rita
s 700 Favro Aldo O AL5.5504 3 Mattson Gordon
4,3 310 Hurt James R O BA6-2918 706 Vacant
311 Trimm Wm C O BA8 247p SP2-1622
' �! 315 Delaurenti Frank O AIS 7006 707 Sylvia Lug F @ BA6-4295 v 4 Olson Donald
i• 316 Sparrow Jack M BA65827 708 Kauzlanch Violet Mrs O 5 Packard Michl
III)
AL5-0285 -f 6 Wilson Richd T S
W ���0 319 Evans Sheridan G O 709 Wheaton Eleanor 7 Hunsberger Jim L
°� AI 5 6263 SP2�992
Y ' gill,. 320 Bar'darson Baird M O 711 Timmons Howard M326 Beck Ralph P O Ai S g656712 Provin Charlotte M Mrs O 8 Vacant
r W , ) 329 Little Geo O AL5-7587 AI-r'S 9 Vacant
a. 330 White Robt E O 713 Vacant a 10*Sloan Kan L
i 333*Mc Pherson Wayne 6 5246 718 Lotto Michl S O 4.
11 Bhaita Kanayo S
i • r ,� 333r4 Tharp Margt Mrs O G
801 Gigll Rose M ALS-5120
12 Vacant
i s oo ._ L;= AL5 4344 804 Vacant 14 Packard Allen M
`` •1 "'~ 338 Wm P AL,5-4093 807 Gigli Andrew O AL53163 No Return
6
c., u = 343*Welch r Ellie S Bergh Helen Mrs BA62747 15 Return
405 Favro Eugenia Mrs O 811 Mountjoy James W O 16*Gurule Frank
AL5-7222 AL5 7334 17 Vacant
410 Knott Ralph F O •AL5-5116 814 O'Hara Harold @ BA65083 18 Vacant
.i 411 Anderson Michl W O 815 Newell John 0 O BA6 9076 r' 19 Vacant
r Anderson
3106 816 Broadbent
Gordon H OBA8 _ 21 Vacant
412 Lesmeister Raymond O 21 Draper Adeline M
'AL5-2105 S 9Tf'I ST INTERSECTS "_' 22 Phillips Jack
v m 416 Schlr>w�r Jack H O AL5 0852 918 Mc Cutcheon Michl O STREET CONTINUED
11670 Seresun Mike O SP
.:,t w c 419 BaL5-3 BNice C Mrs OO 922 Vacant 11680 Marinich Wm O SP
Oi Al
S 118TH ST INTERSEC]
"C N 420 Rogers Claude P O AL5-2070
41 12 420 Cox Edw A BA6-6463 S 116TH PL INTERSECTS 18 11800 Skyway Methodist C
s• 424 Kuney Charles AL•5-6546 11410 Quick StopGrocerySP2-1700tonA
C 435 Maynick Edw F @ AL5 7648 Sick 100
Renton Avenue Day
Center Union SP2-1860
.�. 439 Costner E Edna Mrs O 11433 Brooks ()sterna L Mrs 11809 Skyway Union SP2-9
AL5 4255 SP2 1392 11811 Seattle First Nations
0. 4 i� C 00 500*Vidmar John F O 271-0.504 11436 Vacant
-.- ; C 501 Ka1is Mary Mrs OO AL5-7063 11444 Byers Judy Mrs SP2-0754 11819 Skyway(Skyway Pk Br) 583
�. O Z 502 Vidmar Frank J O AL5-0604 11458 Johnson Feldon yway Park Bowl b
ea 503 Petchnick Sam O 11464 Jourdan RoFe H Jr O SP2-1220
'� art 509 Sartumini Geo O AI 5 4109 69TH PL S INTERS Lucky Game-Inn restr SP2-I
A 515 Matko Louis O INTERSECTS a 11825 Lucky Stores gro BakerSP
523 Breda RaymondAI'S 8035 11605 Vacant Van De Kamp O AL5 9706 11610 Roberts Emmelie SP2-0442 11829 Fisher Drugs SP2-072
w > 524 Overman Marie T Mrs OO
M �+ Bagger Len SP2 2511 i 11831 Skyway> u BA6-0934 yway Park Cleanin
11630 Davidson Dennis O Center SP2�081
. M _ 528 Perola Hugo E O AL53086 SP2 4729
'w 0 530 Stanley Edw D O AI�2281 11641 Clifford Glad L Mrs O 11835 Mister Robert's Color
a 532*Hurskainen John O Coiffures beauty sale
AL55169 SP2-0529 S'2 1600
,. .i I. m 11650 Irish Evelyn Mrs O Lloyd's Barber Shop
' G C 535 Gilroy Patricia Mrs O SP2-1237 "
A�.. A BA8-2933 11655 Skyway SI'2 9993
�y 606 Boisseau Eliz Mrs OO Y�ay Eason Service 11837 Phillips Lloyd SP2-99�
laf. A 57 772-0660 +� 11839 Clay's Lemon Tree
11656 Albertson's Grocery :�
® 610 FaA Kathryn Mrs 0 (Skyway Restaurant SP2-6180
Pk Br) SP2-1660 11840 Herr Lumber Co SP2-
68TH AV S INTERSECTS •
t t 11844 Herr Lbr (Stge Only)
1973 POLK DIRECTORY
Y --
r
/9''3
•
/ _
Y _ _ _ _ _ -
•
•
ERVE YOU ti ._ 203 v _
y4:':' 12 708 Kauzlarich Violet Mrs O k
•• ipNI AV S —FROM 1314 S 255-0285
me San :ng 8T NORTHWES
T 709 Wheaton Ralph
EST RE�'tos lOw BUMP „?tam 711*Rose Glen 226-6978 `•J
p()DE 98055 712 Provin Charlotte M Mrs O
i Callen Fred C @ 255-7686 255-5583 -
ancis Doran R 8 James R O Mrs p18 713*Covert Steven M 228 1325 0+
a Harold 'J'a. 4 Srimm Gladys 718*V erzola Louis -0•„
Y f• 2ffi2470 801 Gigli Rose M 255-5120 "" r .
9TH ST INTERSECTS Ildaurenti Frank O 255-7006 804*Faull Donald L O 235-0130 ••m
iristensen Norman A 6 al Sparrow Jack M 226-5827 807 Gigli Andrew 0° 255-3163 A it Z •
le Dennis O 226-Ter 20 liana Sheridan G O 255-6263 808 Bergh Helen Mrs 226-2747 '�''•T
intu Evaristo € 221-Cw '1A%Bardarson Baird M O 811 Mountjoy James W O oN
10TH ST INTERSIX.'^+ SI b k Ralph P O 255-9656 255-7334 �• "' •
Hunt Bessie R I•It_; •le little Geo O 255-7587 812 O'Hara Harold 226-5083
ot
;itchel Earl @ 29Fa.I.^r• ,*White Robt E O 226-5246 815 Newell John 0 O 226-9076
Mc Hoes Alvina ME 43 Mc Pherson Wayne G 816 Vacant
271-2077 Xpla Tharp Margt Mrs O S 9TH ST LNTERSECTS ?e -
Walther Harold € Nr2 L+ . 256-4344
918 Mc Cutcheon Michl O r+
datanski Larry 0 IS Rakb Wm P 255-4093 228-0993 -o•„
10TH CT L'TERSfX , kwman Reggie L o 4.-4 o
eighner Geo D C. 4Vat = rro Eugenia Mrs O 922 Vacant +N=
dead Verl C e 2264,01 -- ,5Z-1 N �+
aV"n
Vacant ,ttsott Ralph F 255-5116@me
S 116TH PL INTERS 17 1,1C-4
✓scant s Anderson Michl W O 11410 Andre's WoodcraftF And Gift In:`=V.
o 4'
;loser Patk D ® Z71.11'.I '. 2283106 Store 772-4750 i
Jo Return l]ctmeister Raymond O 11420*Hoag Glenn E m D
;rant Wm J ® 22s-Carl: 46,`:155-n05 11433 Brooks John 772-1392
-
roelich Robt H G 2•as001Z Jack H O 255-0852 11436 Vacant
;mith J B C 228-4.S21 tO�ni Nice C Mrs O 11444 Vacant -i •
Roland Carl H € 2 -' 5�l.553378 �9
Kamon Kathleen 2yt�s: 11458 Vacant -0 gm E i��ie� _..r''
A'illiams Danl L Rrr �t4rrsClaude P O 2552()7p 11464 Jourdan Roy H Jr O 0 y= "
Cox Edw A 226-6463 69TH PL S INTERSECTS • - c °° („
228-5348
�{1Kaaey Charles L 255-6546 11605 Vacant N`-'_ > —
Larson Del O )t:rnick Edw O 255 7648 11610*Mittendorf C 772-5525 N r < MMIll
'`:
Richards James E 6 0Ostner E Edna Mrs O
255-3944 'z.2 54255 Vacant o
3runette Leonard J 11630 Davidson Dennis O ��m
Yldmar John F O 271 504 772-4729 m •
2261249 ,
Vacant Q tali' Mary Mrs O 255-7063 11641 Clifford Gladys L Mrs O K - '
serpa J ® 25S Q Vidmarft Fhtehnickrank J O 255-3604 772-0529 ` -.
erpaion MelvinL ST Lh'TERS1'.'Yf Sam 11650 Irish Evelyn Mrs O �1 - • - -
umini Geo O
11TH ST INTERSF,CIS ° 255-4109 772-1237 o to ��_ '
3onwe1l Francis E C° Louis
° O 255 8035 66'TH AV S INTERSECTS �s "' ,
Desch Raymond O 255-9706 11655 Skyway Exxon Service 12'', �� �,1 • ! t' "255-7R59 ii Overman Marie T Mrs O 772-0660 +�o Gt.?Houde Edw O 2286 57 4. 34
3ardner James D 0' heroin Hugo E p 11656 Albertson's Grocery (Skyway :,',';',T, �I j .
226-2728 �m1ey Edw D O 2 2781 Pk Br) 7721660 4,00 --• :i ,• ; ' . •.,
smith Ruth Mrs 226-1X3 Bankainen John O 255-5169 11660 Hill crest Court Apartments -"-
Wendorff Bruce F ® Mrs O 1 Johnson Al 772-1618 ,-f -.a l'f iw-,•+•r:»
2265304 at�'� 2*Fogelman Ena 3m „ '.'. �`
;onyac Arth E ZS > a Eliz Mss O 2555857 333
3 Mattson Gordon C *. k ,.:=, '.
Hurter H Donald 0 772 1622 .++ " t "; '':
;:..
255-0645 i.1. 1 Kathryn A Mrs O 4 Olson Donald 772-2154 �_ • {;, .
Van D Lucille Xis it ,, ) - Jr O5*Keough Diane !� '
Van
22E Derford
e 6 255-1281 6 Wilson Richd T 772-1243 i ;xT,
•• Win R O 226-4473 --
Thiele Claude H ® 25S> a7 Hunsberger Jim D eo 14-'I.: a
° errs Patk H 772-4992 ..a 3 ��` l.�.L;^
Barrett Ron O ,,,
salsas Odell O 2284851 1284 8*Kendall Steve _co r
plson Vergil H O 22A i ek Mary O 255 5355 9 Woodward Jerry 772-2809 N a T
Hawk C Mrs Alldo O 10 Mykleburst Larry N
Robt O 235• 1 ` 11*Meyers Bob o��+
[,avac Hoffman Maurice R • David E 255 7510 12 Camp Dennis c.: 1�
u.Eug F 0° 226-4295 14*Hudson Berle •1 ta`:�,
1975 POLK DIRECTORY , .,,�s` '
t�r4 4'•q:^• ,tf` { .4t1'y Yt� •
' 1W 1,o'F ,1 • a.,i
,4.,„ • •,„.*, air ,; '•x•itt .p; y1 } ,- r l ,s�C:V...? Ca'� ;yl- .'.1
: • . u • 1� �- , •
aia h ti •'' d•
bb - : ♦ .�.•; �'c� ;' ' wT ,' r 41 'r t *. '. .� -
• suev.. S , . ..s j, - 4• ei'Sti.i - R .y , «T � •7„, � -sitl :^1; Ty �a,0 „� -. ''-'. fa,q„ ¢ ,aY •t' r >n r'kh � *.s fl,iii .sv%•. �.pr::4, T'��t v .;x �' . .� t,tee S3, y�• •
•
�•S•1,.i . ya ,,r . .,n�'9-,* � �"j .,J^ ��,, w} } .4,;*a 3riK�`• �y4� jr,yait . . . - *
•
'1 , *1 {� - . y � :-• y* 1�I M 4 1f At4 � Yl'f 7tir „{g ,�. � - � I.tt- a ' i1". ' { ;>, gr aa '''''S:.` sr a i T
. at!__ , '•-. wa ' ' 15 "' . fY,I , 'a2 : • , r " 4*- : p1.sifn X'�Y `e� "r ' +t as
•
•
.w•_r
s1,' • yr
,107 Cherry ] • '
~� _ a .. �„ Street •`_ r • , 'z
_3.'.- Seattle
(98104)Tel 447 3700 {<'f 's. a , 1
OF �"
:; - KING COUNTY " (• M 1 \.
/
- I
317 ____
Y
OLYMPIC RISE INTERSECTS r
688 Crozier Hugh T ® 226-4647 i -
L 77 691 Lineberger Joel G O 271-0725 E MACLYN ST INTERSECTS .fir"
L '72 8 692 Brown Claude F 2263972 407*Sonnenfeld Walter W @ 8544327 •
, } {
M• 772 2421 433*Evanson Donald G 854-1291 :'' y�
696 Vacant 434 Yambra Clare K Mrs OO 8525257 t . ^ p 4.1
•
NE 7TH ST INTERSECTS . s
,751*Reynolds Claudia ® 255.4340 455 Vandenberg Charles OO 852-0954 41 i.,,� ;-
nes GUIBERSON ST INTERSECTS � 3`A•3ry ;.
V▪ 654 7�`�y Dn 469 Pollack John P © 852-1759 - 1
Vetoer 759 Holmquist Gene E 493 Iverson Margt Mrs OO 852-4096 �p ,;` "
760 Van Meet Gene E ® 2261605 SEATTLE ST INTERSECTS + �`
764 Schmidtd Ronnie 502 Lee Robt E @ 852-4610 li.1. rt,'fi'.i-+K i
tnd7 764 Ralph O°
Marylou @ 2713307 3� 508 Binkerd James A @ 862-5724 . • ;
„M- •77g2169 ;ai.770 Banalt WOODLAND WAY INTERSECTS ,t
•770 Banaaky-Thos � 226-7229 ., .;;�c• - _
530 Loring Ave E Mrs ® 862-2810
771 Secey David 271-1866 :_ . -
;t1da 772-1116 t3�- C.V..--.b37 Baerny'e Valley Maintenance jars awe '
777.No Return -' .- ,'�'
W T2.04660NE 8TH CT INTERSECTS ': . .852.8329 .. :_> :` _ - a n
�.7720466 r ,; ;-. Baerny La Roy L-® 852-8329 .•. 138/
�* s:803 Rice Clay 235-0765 538 Ellerman Lawrence D OO
Re�M-, • 8 Wallaceop James A OO 255-8319 617 Gower Grant E OO 854-1326 �t . :5 y I'','"';:::;-
r eH 815 m Edwind D OO 22 0996 CHICAGO ST INTERSECTS 1, w
834 Dahlstrom OO 255-0094 R
r Eleanor 700 Venables Harry K ® ' r
�+.;851 No Return 706*Stubbs Michl N OO '
ne - 851 Schaaf Heinz K OO 1 r
CLAUREL ST INTERSECTS iis 'y a' C
ID • 854*Fisher Clifford OO 226-5499 722 Crenshaw Fern E ® 854-0678 •
t�Kai.,+
sea Inc come inv 858 Vacant • 724 Chadwick Thos M OO 852-3372 " •-, i ,......
i 1 ±
-.- 858 Frazier Michl R � 255-7924 . • f, ��
I �
736*Johnson Ray O ^'f' a ,alty 772-1000 ,:. 859 Vacant - HEMLOCK ST INTERSECTS ,�.-> �.r i s
862 Nelson Paul W ® 2267837 803 Ellis David R 852-3065 6`�'ti ^' t •
-• 863 Yankeh Francis R @ 2262857 812 Buxton Roger L 854 9368 ` "`
✓ A @ 772-0857 866 Francis Doran R 226-2013 815 Ellis Paul T @ g52-0102 a'
:. 872 No Return !.
obt▪ E 772-0111 NE 9TH ST INTERSECTS 819 Vacant ;�
824 Wilson Madeline Mrs 8525015
i Mrs OO 772-1287 906 No Return-- 825 Loop Irene Mrs OO 852-2519 • ae
ERSE -,,.' t=-:,,. . t.' l...*.
-� :915 Can Dennis 2 22 929 825'*Rournan Lavonne 854-2620 `ili .'Y
915 Cantu EST IN O 22 838 Reitan Erlend A OO 8545914 ,i y` i rf'
NE lOTH ST INTERSECTb ..'��� B-,7,_id 840 Reitan Eric OO 854-1966 ;I __iaermy Studio 7721020 1005 Hunt Bessie R 271-1401 844 Reiten Edmond L O g522730 ; .4 ^.
op small epPl repr 1006 M Ho Earl O 2M © , 855 Wilcox Paul M OO 852-0626 --p.-
1009 Walther Hoes Jeanne M O 271-226- ,l4,i, fit• "
1012 June T Mrs © 2262423 858 Reiten Edmond L Jr O 85432M • + r r:1
WALNUT ST INTF_.RSEC13 • ',i
1013 Matanaki Larry 4) 905*Mc Kelvey Hamilton O 852-7466 `'
NE lOTH CT INTERSECTS � _
RD INTERSECTS
906 Eggert Wilfred A O 852-1703 :. - 'i
RD INTERSECI� 1020 Fe ad V l C D 2 228-0753 FY * 'sr
1025 Mead Verl C @ 226-3426 913 Lend Arnold :�5
919 Marlatt Bert R OO 852-2629 ..
828 1028*Phelps Wayne 2235-1428 926 Loop Brooks E O 852-0'347 i 1_ �
IW SOUTH
ON>—FROM 1033 Browne'
JohnPi A 2 26-797 927 Mariam Calvin B OO 852b381 i'
1033 Return Phil 22679761
AY SOUTHMAPLE ST INTERSECTS ""--
1030 No 1005 Hillcrest Cemetery 852-1322 • • R �qc
10404 Grant Marilyn Mrs 259 0931
5 693 •
1044 Froelich Cant H 2265991
Froelich Carol 2 900 FROM 25900 t
1048*Huff Leon O 228-2987 RETTH RD (KEN'I')— �.
MILITARY RD EAST e3=-9114�•t ,
630 1049 Smith Joseph B © 228-5503 ,{
• 12400(RENTON>--ONE 1050 Roland Carl H 255 222D w�
ZIP CODE 98031 I! S� - `•.,•
' 84TH AV 9 1055*Brown Robt J 28-56308 4436*Kraft Clifford E © 8520832
.• 1055 Larson el 228 5630 `'
re : =.1059 Larson Del 8 620 '"'
ld A 773 1066 Richards James E © 2553944 RENTON S (RENTON}—FROM ,
and A 772 6850 3' 1067 Brunette Leonard J O 2261249 1314 S 7T AV ST NORTHWEST `
1072 Vacant
o Melvin J o0 255.6643
725779 1073 Serpa -\ - 644 c•. f?:j .
NE iOTH PL ST INTERSECTS a
NE 11TH ST INTERSECTS • ZIP CODE 98055 'r"
300 Callen Fred C OO 255-7686 ' r'
610 111111 Burwell Francis E 6 255-2859 310 Hurt James R O° 226-2918 N.A." ' a,
7 1. ,3c
PL ORTH AI>—FROM GardnerGade James D @ 311*Nomi Robt 271-1634
• NORTH 1112 Smith hMrsD O 2262728 315 Delaurenti Severina Mrs O 255-7006 .-
1114 rff Bruce 226122603 316 Sparrow Jack M OO 2265827 t
I55 11158 Co ndarPf F 2 -8 319 Evans Sheridan G OO 255-6263 ,,fl
O 2553538 1118 Hurter
Arth E @ 255-8702 320 Bardarsan Baird M O ?� ''
y 2285644 1119 Vanter H Donald OO ?550645 P OO 255-9656 • ,
I1_4 Van Derford Lucille Mrs OO 228-5676 326 Beck Ralph .�,s��
329 Little Geo OO 255-7587 Y :
eu L E OO 271-1692 1151 Thiele Claude H O 255-1610 330 White Robt E O 2265246 1 -:-,
e L Mrs 255 2547 1155 Barrett Ron @ 228d549 333 Mc Pherson Wayne G -
OO 228-2397 1159 Sa Vacant
Odell OO 2284854 �1 Tharp Margt Mrs OO 255 4344 't r ,'
1159 Vacant gag Welch Wm P OO 2554093 'r
lyde 2354817 1160 Houk Darleen O 3438 Newman Reggie L O •h'.�`
Rick J O 2263842 1163*Jelinek Donald-A 235-0854
,
o1164 Lavachek Maurice R OO 405*Tends FdahOO p55 5116 'z-7- 'u
Ralph J O 255-9361 410 Knott Ralph A @ 255-0187 600 411 Anderson Ann M Mrs O 't:13S-a«
and OO 255-2105
bert
FROM 700 412 Lesmeister Raymw -o>z
ark J O 226 4306 REITEN RD (KENT� 416 Vacant •-'t
[ark TITUS ST SOUTHEAST 419 Balzarini Nice C Mrs OO 2563378 5111
Jerry E 2713277 420 Rogers Claude P OO 255-2070 ; -: tl;
/avid• n Mrs OO 226-0744 ZIP CODE IN 42054 Cox Edw A 226-6463 "- fy Y
)avid K OO 2269129 E TITUS ST INTERSEC 15 424 Kuney Charles L Zb5 6546 1 _''�., !•.4'ti. L.:•,'
b E 0 KENSINGTON AV S INTERSECTS i . -'>__.a• -
1977 POLK DIRECTORY s4--: Ftn
N:CI;,rF�. ..t "•V YM.. � �#l�7 tP1�' \
•
A A `
•'c,ram g,;' pi
J. .y.� (. ty�� a. y,.. _ t'. Rp+'
/9 '7
s Y _ _ -
e Y •
>-+ r
1
i. a %t '
r . ' Open filters say
y 1� � 11nivcrsi! j413ookStOiC. !Park free -
Use Your an
* + = .;z rr: '''' 1326 University Way ill..Seattle 198105) .134 400 -• , j •.. .
f4yr �` �
'- a -,.. R) 'TON AV S (R)--(.ontd 22 Hudson Beryl 12015 La Fayette Sales w
s1,,.�.. STREET CONTINUED 772-1160
Is.A.. .1;.'
.e' .*.i � 435 MaynickEdw OO 255 7648 I e Fayette Normal
i 439 Coetner E Edna MrsOO 255-4255 11670 Seresun Mike @ 772-0567 S 12La PL toIN Nor a/
• ""t "' . -ems 500*Mc Donough Jan O 11680 Marinich Wm 772-0519
1 �" ' �� - 501 Kalis Mary Mrs OO 255-7063 S 118TH ST INTERSECTS 12016 White Robt K 772-
502 Vidmar Frank J OO 255-3604 11800 Skyway Methodist Church 772-1700 12022 Martin Helen Mrs
-'r , Renton Avenue Day Care Center 12025 Peiroli Pete M @
} d " � 503*Talkers Ronald C 271-2916 7721860 12026 Osthue Norman E
;,-� • 508*Vidmar9 John F OO 271-0iO4 12029 Aske Arth H € 7'
�� '' 509 Saturnini Geo @ 255-4109 11605 Vacant
"r7a 0 11809 Skyway Union 772-9901 12030*Campos Edwardo
>"' 515 Breda Louis O 255 8035
"' 523 Breda Raymond @ 255-9706 11811 Seattle First National Bank (Skyway 12033 Smith Tme H O "
f,.r. Pk Br) 5835974 12034 Fore Michl D O 7
e T' 524*Mc Cloud Kenneth O 226b934 11819 Skyway Park Bowl bowling 772-1220 12038 Helterline Harold
528 Perola Vienna V 25 O 255-30861 Game-Inn restr 7721220 12039 Burnett Roy S OO
530 Stanley Edw D C� 2552281
� 011825 LuckyStores gro 772-1750 12042 Waller Gladys T T
y� 532*Carnes Ed B O 255-5169 12043 Farrell John J C�
1� ''i BONDED 535 Gilroy Patricia Mrs C 228-2933 Van De Kamp Bakery
k„k 11829 Fisher Drugs 772.0720 -12046 Harper Clyde R 6
x 606*Blattner Nicholas 2713618 Park CleaningCenter 12049 Vacant
.> COLLECTORS 610 Faull Kathryn A Mrs @ 255-3680 11831 Skyway 12052*Lee B E Mrs 772
611 Cugini Alex Jr @ 255-1281 7726(181
'"''+Y 620 Hodgson Wm R @ 226-4473 11835 Robert's Color & Coiffures beauty 12055 Gilchrist
i christ Jameanc'
' salon 7721600
6216 Po tisiette Patk H 2 2551284
626 Postishek Mary OO 255-5355 Cole's Barber Shop 772-9993 12058 Pomade Frank O
,'I - x,k•+F;c, 627 Smith Wm B @ 11839 Tenderloin Unlimited restr 772-5900 12061*Dorrough Earl
3 ,i 700 Favro Aldo @ 255-5504 11840 Herr Lumber Co 772-1550 12064 Berry Dean Mrs
e 11844 Herr Lbr (Stge Only) 12067*Meuli A L 772-ll
k +� 706*{,00ia Edwin 2267798
#;,.....
�` € 707 Sylvia Eug F @ 226-4295 11890 Ken's Gasoline& Stge (Stge Annex) 12070 Lauck Mary Ann
;{ + . 708 Ksuzlarich Violet Mrs @ 255-0285 11900 Ken's Gasoline & Storage gasoline 12073 Rock Viva M Mr
tr sta 772-0605 12076 Ginithan Fred @
rtfP0-'-!• i .., 711 No et Phil 11901 Bill's Skyway Drive-In restr 12082 Morgan Richd W
711 No Return 772 6320 75TH AV S INTERSI
` 712 Proven Charlotte M Mrs @ 255-5583
' P--4. ! 41903 Skyway Park Arco 772-9988 12401 Skyline Apartmer
> t5tf.r NO FEE 718 VacantD Bruce .
718 Verzola Louis 11904 Marianna Apartments 772-1458 Men Gerald TT
101 Hendry Cindy
>���% .�4 -r., UN7�L 801 Gigli Rose M 255-5120 _
804 Faull Donald L OO 235-0130 102 Mauromatis Constantine 772-2665 4 Sowers Theo TT.
` ;;r; WE COLLECT 807 Gigli Andrew @ 255-3163 _ . 103*Crozrer Lenore
i g 101*Lapnore P
P � 104*Wigsmoen Ray
' $ 808 Bergh Helen Mrs 226-2747
+y ,. - 811 Mountjoy James W @ 255-7334 105 Janders Mary K Mrs 772-1410 - , 102*Allen
a Hond wer(
' ''' .. '1 812 O'Hara Harold 226-5083 106 Fitzgerald Verla
•" 107 Anderson Soren A 772-1478 104 Mc New J
�� 815 Newell John 0 O 226-9076 201*Weston Fred
•s a a 108 Bender Kath Mrs 772-4819 202 Warns
r 816 , Birdsall H
Vacant 109 arold 772-1458 - 202 Woodbridge
_ {: • S 9TH ST INTERSECTS - �-
`'.'... 918 Mc Cutcheon Michl ® 228-0993 110*Henke Richd
<. ,., r 922 Vacant f. - 111 Koreis Wm T 7725760 c: • ' 204 Mac Donald
' 201*Nanecivich Cynthia ..-_-_--__------205 Smith Jerry
S 11tiIH PL INTERSECTS - 202*Weber Carl 206*Williams E
`-•"••- 207*Denny K
628 203*Carland M iI-3" 301*Ford D
-11410 Andre's Woodcraft And Gift Store 204*Morrow Betty 302 DJu
1513 - 172-4750 - 205*Mc Cann Alice 302 TownsendStevens Ju
!t•i: .l. - 206*Ostrom Margt •-
ale
h( _ 11433 BrooksDesmond John 0738 _• 207 Mills Mary Mrs 772-5399 304 Schuerman (
r '" H.W. - -11433 A 772-1392 - 208 Mercer Agnes Mn 7726559 305*Hemphill RI
57th Street 11436=11444 Ervin M Guy Taylor N V TT-' - 1;,,' 209 Clay Robt H 306*Schuerman
;,�-. 307 Vacant
11458 Vacant .-i' aY !t-t. '210 Field Grace-- _•r‘-b-1'REFT CONTINUE
l Seattle ,�:_. 211-Lappin Cath 772-5086 -
_ I 114646 PL S INTERSECTS H Jr @ v,,72D AV S INTERSECTS i- %X A 12405 Vacant
I. .9a 1�� 69TH PL S
' '-�11605 Vacant -• '%�="1" , - 11905 Farmer Mildred Mrs 772Fi.988 12407 Vacant
' --11610*Bowker Gregory-H-772-0175 11906 Lefcoski Frank T OO 772-0256 12409 Rainier Realty
�.. 11630 Weber Gene 4 TT21126 �: --'11908 Lewis Michl 772-1575 12419 Skyway Fabric
.s L Mrs @ TT • fabrics notions
2-0529 11909 County Sewage Dist 3 & 4 772-0600
` -_11641 Clifford Gladys 11650 Thew Marie 6 '72 TT
2941 11910*O'Livas Edw 2 12421 Pizza Hut restr
1335 AV S INTER
•
- • 68TH AV S INTERSECTS 11911 O'Halloran Charles ® TT26755
11655 Skyway Exxon Service 772-0660 ' 11914 Frederick Joseph A 6 772-0903 _ 12512 King Sire Phot
a Pk Br) 11918 Smith J 772-2244 7721530
'' 11656 Albertaon's Grocery (Skyway 12536 Clipping Co IT
€':' -11919 Taylor Edw W
:+t• `I 772-1660 •
• 74TH AV S INTERSECTS 7726502
f�I 11660 Johnson
Court Apartments 12540 Hunter Eleetxo
•5 1 Johnson Al 772-1618 11924*Weber H Earl � 772-0182 TT25993
2*Hexener Frank • 74TH AV S INTERSECTS
�. ' TEL 3*Sherwood Handel . r 11925 Young Ernest M bldg contr @ 12542 Vacant
772-0640 12544 Room Thirteer
t, { Olson Donald 772-2154 11928 Davis Lena Mrs • 7721319
t �89-2600 b WilsonLane Nicole ,•11929 Tasa J M @ 772-0656 12546 Skyway Coin
I 6 rger T D 312548 One Hour Ma
t I 7 Hunsberger Jim D 772-4992 r- 11932 Davila Art O
8*Belles Gail : 11933 Rabago Danl L @ 772-4637 .;.•.12561 Abbott2 AAutom
- ,R 9 Woodward Jerry 772-2809 11934 Berggren Harold L 6 772-1987 le
_ ---10*Donnellsy Denise 11937 Campbell Thos T ® 772-6418 Skyway Pop !
• i 11938 Courtney Charles 6 772-1373 +1. 772-1165
1 -11 Meyers Bob - r.'.S 126TH ST INTE
Y-4 I ? -12 Hyde Rita 772-6695 11S 1*2 TH�SnT�INfERSECTS 12600 Family Mark
'=- 1{*Gilchrist Wm- - _- — -.12603 Franke Milk
1%'•-'-= 15 Smith Joseph 772-4769 7ank's
- • - •tf 17 Vacant
- Wm A
�. 'r �.17 Vacant �-- 1++ �..12001 Bailey Juanita L Mrs ® 7725280 :;.t?`" Self-Service G
18 Strauss Jeff- - - • 12005 Bower Clytie Mrs OO 772-1322 12608 State Liquor
19 Haugen Lob = 12006 Berger Robt S Jr 7720769 " 12615 Vin�xnt Rash
-< 20*Harmon Alice •`• 12011 Stephens Mary T Mrs ® 772-1192. s. 126116 A & H Drug'
f.:.ai-21 Camp Dennis - ' ' e.12012•Vacant:- _. - _, ._i'_:+:._ i_ 7726000
• 1977 POLK DIRECTORY
I ._/
;�.. CITY OF RENTON
HE r pp�Q�y�,��//� NO
//q/� �/{� �7 ARAMD
J U N 2ING IX O 197 PM
LIMITED USE PERMIT NO. 20-23-05-1111 AM
7,8,9,10,11,12,1,2A4,5,6
- THIS LIMITED USE PERMIT made this day of ,
1977 , by and between PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington
corporation ( "Puget" herein) and TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY, a California corporation, as Trustee, ( "Transamerica"
herein) :
In consideration of the covenants and conditions herein con-
tained and in full compliance with paragraph 6 of that certain
Earnest Money Agreement dated October 29 , 1965 , between Puget
Western, Inc . , and Transamerica Development Company, Puget hereby
grants permission to Transamerica to use the real property (the
"Property" herein) situated in Renton, King County, Washington,
as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference
made a part hereof.
1. Term. The term of this Permit is ninety-nine (99) years
from the date of said Earnest Money Agreement of October 29 , 1965 .
2 . Use of Property. The occupation and use of the Property
by Transamerica shall be limited to access , uncovered automobile
parking and recreational purposes , provided that such use and
occupation shall not be exercised in a manner that would interfere
with, impede or be detrimental in any way to the unrestricted
primary use of the Property by Puget for electrical utility right
of way purposes or in any way create risks or hazards to persons
or property in light of such primary use, and provided further
that Transamerica ' s use shall at all times be expressly subject
to Puget ' s right to construct , operate, relocate, maintain or
repair existing or future transmission or distribution lines on
the Property without any cost to Puget arising from any disturb-
ance to improvements made by Transamerica.
3. Structures . No building shall be erected or permitted upon
the Property at any time and no other structures shall be erected
except those normally incident to uncovered parking and/or recrea-
tional purposes and in no event shall any such improvement be
permitted which would in any way create a risk or hazard with
relation to the primary electric utility use to which the Property
is devoted. In the construction of any permitted improvements,
Transamerica shall comply with all applicable safety and building
codes and regulations.
4 . Taxes. Transamerica shall be responsible for the full
amount of real property taxes assessed on the Property and any
improvements made thereon by Transamerica. Transamerica shall,
on an annual basis, reimburse Puget for the full amount of any
such, taxes paid by Puget following the notification by Puget as
to the amount thereof, but not upon any improvements made thereon
by Puget.
5. Insurance . Transamerica shall buy and maintain in full
force and effect throughout the term hereof public liability
insurance in the policy amounts of $1, 000 , 000;$3, 000, 000 and
property damage insurance in the policy amount of $50 , 000 . Such
policy or policies shall expresly name Puget as an additional
insured and shall be non-cancellable without prior written notice
first having been delivered to Puget.
6 . Assignment. Transamerica, or its successor, may at any
time assign or transfer all of its rights hereunder, provided
that no partial assignment or transfer shall be permitted without
the prior written approval of Puget, which approval Puget covenants
it shall not withhold unreasonably, taking into consideration the
needs of Transamerica, or its successor, in connection with an
orderly development and sale of the property. Upon any such
assignment or transfer, Transamerica , or its successor, as the
case may be, shall be relieved of its unaccrued obligations
hereunder with respect to the property so assigned or transferred.
7. Termination for Default. If Transamerica or any of its
assignees or successors shall, default in the performance of any
covenants or agreements or conditions herein with respect to any
portion of the Property, and if such default shall continue for
a period of thirty (30) days after receipt by Transamerica or its
then successor or assignee with respect to the Property so involved
of written notice from Puget of said default, Puget may, at the
end of said period, declare this permit forfeited and said term
ended with respect to the portion of said Property involved, by
giving Transamerica or its said successors or assigns then
holding. Transamerica ' s interest with respect to such portion of
the Property involved, written notice of forfeiture.
- 2 -
-'. •
LIMITED USE PERMIT
(P.S.P. & L. Co. No. 20-23-05-1111 )
EXHIBIT "A"
That portion of the H. H. Tobin Donation Land Claim No. 37
lying Southerly and Westerly of the Plat of Highland Addition
to the Town of Renton, and that portion of Government Lot No. 1,
Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , County of
King, State of Washington, lying east of Primary State Highway
No. 1, more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at the intersection of the North line of said Section
20 with the Westerly limit of the Plat of Highland Addition to
the Town of Renton, said point is North 89°59 ' 27" West, 1, 386 . 85
• _feet from the North Quarter corner of said Section; thence South
•.01°29 ' 35" West along the Westerly limit of said plat , 973 . 04 feet
to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 01°29 ' 35"
West, 214. 88 feet; thence North 67°03 ' 41" West 554 . 63 feet to
the Easterly limit of Primary State Highway No. 1 ; thence along
a curve to the left, from which the radial point bears North
62°49 ' 31" West, having a radius of 2 ,050 . 00 feet through a central
angle of 05°34 ' 38" an arc distance of 200 . 14 feet; thence South
67°03 '41" East, 470 . 99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
•Containing 102, 235.84 square feet more or less .
• SUBJECT TO: All prior rights of record.
•
•
•
EXECUTED as of the day and year first above written.
• TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRUSTEE
By:
Its
By
Its
PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
By
a a r, Rea Estat Division
•
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)) SS:
COUNTY OF KING
On this 7, day o i u , 1977 , before me personally
appeared LESLIE A. DONNER, o me known to be the Manager, Real
Estate Division of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, the corpor-
ation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged
said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed
r,` said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,
oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument.
. 'EN under my hand and 'off ' c ' 1 seal the day and year last
itten .
Ala
Notary Public n a d or the S to f
Washington, residing a
STATE OF
SS .
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 1977 , before me, the under-
signed, personally appeared and
, to me known to be the
and respectively, of TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act
and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that authorized to execute
the said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and
year first above written.
Notary Public in and for the State of
, residing at
•
- 3 -
RECE \1ED - ,,
CITY OF RENTON
. CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
JUN 2 0 1978
•
PLANN UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AM Pik
F REN>.,
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY `[ �D TOE
/� a��11� File No. f'f C).") -/72-I4
MASTER PLAN
(.) 1 16 Date Rec'd. 41-- ,f: -7,f
PUD 0 ` S I— Fee $ gD/. do
Receipt No. -/9'o
X Tentat.i A -,,f.--" _ Residential SM No.
Prei.imin V9 P�� Commercial ECF No. ____ -_�
Final NNE G D Industrial Plat No. ��-!_T
Phase No. Mixed ci e
t-h ,/✓ir,,,v n r, / Fc e.�
t eee ,/ -
-APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 13:
1. Name Gene 0. Farrell Phone 772-5003
Shenandoah Homes
Address 280. Hardie Avenue S.W. , Renton, Washington 98055
2. Property Location West of Cedar Avenue at 7th Street.
3. Legal Description (attach additional sheet if necessary) ff
.t
ADDITIONAL SHEET ATTACHED
_
I;
4. Acres 10. 18 Present Zoning R-3 ' G
5. Type of PUD requested:
X[X] Residential ❑ Industrial � IBI O. /5-
❑ Commercial ❑ Mixed irEM NO. f - /2f- 7 ' �,
6. Residential Characteristics Proposed: Total DUs • 53 /T
DUs/Acre 5.2 DUs by Type and No. See Attached Brief
7. Commercial/Industrial Characteristics Proposed: Number of Structures N.A.
Gross Leasable Area Type of Uses
8. Range of Structure Height: From 22 feet to 30 feet.
9. Special Review Areas (in acres):
[' Under Water [' Subject to Flooding ,.
XX Greater than 10% Slope 9. 1 Acres 0 Subject to Landslides
10. Other Permits Required: j.
❑ Rezone ❑ U.S. Army Corps
n Shoreline Management
a
❑ Flood Plain ❑
11. . If land or structures within a proposed PUD are, (1) to be sold to more than one
person or corporatibn or, (2) to be included in the dedication of land, then a
short or major plat application is to be submitted concurrently.
12. Vicinity and site plan maps, landscaping plan, building elevations, written infor-
mation, and fees must be submitted as required by the PUD Ordinance (See Section
4-27.10).
13. The applicant should be present at the established public hearing date to present
the proposed plans.
City of Renton
Planning Department
9/20/76
��of
AFFIDAVIT v
gEIVED� ' � .
APR 28 ly
I% ✓ �--`- �) /� 4 . ,,.v
� �-e�-„� , "'being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner the propert Inv lved in this application and that the
foregoing st tements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this day of (-WA , 19252
,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at p„,j---„,„ ),A, ,.
f)A ,
Name of NotaryPublic)) ( gnature of Owner
I -300 S l (oa` -PQ 1 " - SS(-ci
(Address) (Address)
PLA4-071 ("OtA
(State)
(City)
•
(Telephone)
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) •
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received , 19 By :
Renton Planning Dept .
I '
4OF R�,L
�► ` i O THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O
p = ti �' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
?,o 235-2550
4/41E0 SEP1'"
October 14 , 1977
The Honorable C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor
Members of the City Council
Renton , Washington
RE : PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ,
RENTON HILL PLANNING AREA (THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY
FAI-405 ON THE WEST , CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH , THE
HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE. EAST , AND THE
POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH )
Dear Mayor and Council Members :
The Planning Commission submits for your consideration recom-
mendations regarding the above described area . This action is
pursuant to the City Council referral and request of June 6 ,
1977 .
The Planning Commission has conducted a series of public
hearings and work meetings regarding the Renton Hill area ,
including a detailed analysis of land use , circulation , and
community facilities . The analysis and recommendation of the
Comprehensive Planning Committee is submitted in the attached
report dated October 12 , 1977 .
At the conclusion of the Planning Commission public hearing
of October 12th , the Planning Commission concurred in the
recommendations of the Comprehensive Planning Committee and
forwarded the committee report to you for your consideration .
' It is recommended that the City Council set November 21st as
a public hearing date on the said recommendations . Your con-
currence is respectfully requested .
Very tru y you s , 11
cv don Y . is en
P anning rector
GYE :wr
Attachments
i \
f�.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
OCTOBER 12 , 1977
TO : Planning Commission Members
FROM: Clark Teegarden , Chairman
Comprehensive Planning Committee
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL AREA
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING
INTRODUCTION :
By action of the Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting
on the above subject matter, the Comprehensive Planning Committee
was requested to study the area in question and report back to the
Commission on October 12 , 1977. The attached public hearing notice
(public hearing , September 14 , 1977 ) describes the area to be con-
sidered and is generally defined as the Renton Hill Comprehensive
Planning Area. (Refer to Public Hearing Notice. )
For the purposes of the Committee ' s deliberations , the Comprehensive
Plan is defined as the offical statement of the City of Renton
establishing major policies concerning desirable future development.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEFINITION AND PURPOSE :
The Comprehensive Plan consists of the Goals , Objectives , and Poli-
cies ; Land Use Element; Circulation Element; Community Facilities
Element; and Definitions . Proposed developments should be reviewed
against the Comprehensive Plan to insure that growth is consistent
with the Plan.
The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are :
To improve the physical and social environment of the
city as a setting for human activities - to make it more
functional , beautiful , decent , healthful , interesting ,
and efficient;
PUBLIC NOTIC
PUBLIC HEARING .
CITY. OF RENTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
•
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON
SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
DESCRIBED BELOW:
r
PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA
IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE
EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH.
1 il - 4
�\ •
•
LL i' 'iq, , Ia nTr , r -
}
ri F FruLi ra. q WF'a::, �r--., �._., 4 9 i '}. \`- �
li, l'r ,1[1,.; .t i >,,--t,‘ ;--, ., ti , 4 , ,, y: 1,,IL ...!:" 1,—. • \ ''
I;,:r 7Y,. •_r,,,, ,_.,„:„__,,.: ,,,,f._:, ,,, ,,.,,„:„____\,,,::_.„.
1
1 -N,,
115::_iltql if 174.--:." .31g. ; l';1 II' :If: '':44'1\11i'l
II
•4�o ih II I
Illi
l/ r ' Y
• . / V.-2:-..,__ --'-.._________ - ---— - j..--,_,;,...;:-_...00---;(1,4!-_'-:
Tr .,-.,-,1ml,. %i'. ------------
1 .
-,: , � .:!- \ MNe l, _-----------------
_-------
/• 1
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED 'TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT
COMMENTS IN WRITING.
•
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT:
CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S.
RENTON, WA. 98055
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Two
To promote the public interest , the interest of the city
at large as well as the interests of individuals , or
special groups ;
To facilitate the democratic determination and implementa-
tion of city policies on development ;
To effect political and technical coordination in
development;
9 To inject long-range considerations into the determination
of short-range actions ; and
® To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on
the making of political decisions on the development of the
city.
The Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as a guide to help resolve
some of the development problems confronting municipal officials and
the people they represent. The Plan takes into account existing con-
ditions and future needs , and attempts to express the best reasonable
consensus that can be achieved at a given time as to the character
and direction of future growth .
The Plan is of necessity general in its proposals . It must be flexible ,
since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect
the community . The Plan is not a zoning ordinance , although it makes
significant recommendations for future land use. ' The Plan is not pre-
cise. It does not represent engineering accuracy , nor does it claim
to predict exactly the future use of every parcel of property , or
insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan .
Comp
rehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Three
In order for the Plan to maintain effectiveness , it should be reviewed
periodically. Conditions might change and unforeseen events may occur
which might necessitate a re-evaluation.
BACKGROUND:
As background to the study of the area in question , the Committee con-
ducted a field trip of the area involved and studied in detail the
existing land use , the characteristics of the existing development , and
the physical features of the land, including topography and drainage .
During the course of the work sessions by the committee , representatives
from property owners in the Hill area were present and provided input
in the matters discussed. The matter of access was considered in some
detail in terms of the existing street rights-of-way, traffic circulation ,
existing street conditions , the parking and access problems to individual
properties , as well as the matter of general traffic circulation .
The study area for comprehensive planning purposes overlapped into
adjacent areas ; and, therefore, the study of the committee encompasses
areas beyond the immediate boundaries of the Renton Hill area , particu-
larly as it relates to traffic circulation , potential development,
need for community facilities , and general area-wide impact of future
development.
The consideration of the committee was basically restricted to con-
sideration of the Comprehensive Plan elements : land use , circulation ,
and community facilities . In regard to said elements , the natural
characteristics of the area were also considered.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Four
LAND USE ELEMENT:
FINDINGS:
1. The Renton Hill area is primarily a single family residential
neighborhood with some limited apartment and duplex use inter-
mixed. The extent of multi -family residential development is
limited at this time and is primarily concentrated along Mill
Avenue South and located westerly of Cedar.
2. Physical characteristics of the area indicate that, while an older
area of the community, the area is basically sound in terms of
both building. and general physical potential for upgrading . This
potential is presently being recognized by many property owners
in the area , and the area is considered a desirable single family
residential neighborhood.
3. While the area has been in a state of transition , with increased
land values , the physical amenities of the Hill area , such as view,
makes the area highly desirable for residential development.
4. The existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for Renton
Hill is primarily single family residential with low and medium
density multi-family residential designations between Mill Avenue
South and Cedar Avenue South and extending southerly to and includ-
ing a larger tract of medium density multi -family residential
located at the southwesterly edge of the Hill area . The hillside
areas to the north are presently designated as greenbelt, with
the existing industrial development adjacent to the railroad
right-of-way and a low density multi -family designation to the
Comprehe.nsiye Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Five
north adjacent to the Cedar River.
5 . The area includes several large tracts of undeveloped areas ,
which represent both potential single family and multi -family
residential development. Development in accordance with the
present plan would result in increased land use densities .
6. The Committee also reviewed the geological conditions of the
Hill area , including consideration regarding mines previously
located in the area. It was initially recognized that the Hill
has large underlying coal beds , some of these beds having been
mined-out. Said coal beds represent not only a future energy
resource potential but also a hazard to any surface development
in terms of possible mine subsidance. The extent of such
development hazard is unknown and will vary with location . It
is recognized, however, such hazards must be considered in
terms of existing and future development.
CIRCULATION:
1 . The Committee initially recognizes that the present circulation
to Renton Hill is restricted to one access point (at Third and
Mill ) , which essentially creates a large cul -de-sac-type situation .
2 . The present 40 foot street rights-of-way restrict access and
limit parking , particularly in that area north of South 7th
Street. The existing topography precludes any substantial
improvement of existing rights-of-way to allow improved access
and parking.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Six
3. The parking for the residential uses is primarily on-street
rather than off-street ; and it is recognized that topography
limitations preclude, in many cases , development of acceptable
off-street parking spaces .
4. Increased traffic has occurred as the result of the extensive
use of Phillip Arnold Park located at the top of the Hill .
This impact is particularly noticeable on Renton Avenue . On-street
parking has also impacted the adjacent residential neighborhood .
5 . The existing Arterial Street Plan indicates the extension of
Mill Avenue extending in a southeast direction , connecting to a
secondary arterial serving the Tiffany Park area. The present
Plan also projects the extension of Grant Avenue South from South
11th to Puget Drive.
6. The extension of Mill Avenue South with the connection as proposed
does not appear to be physically feasible due to the existing devel -
opment that has occurred and the steep topography.
7. New development of any type would, in the opinion of the committee ,
further impact the existing circulation system unless alternative
means of access were provided to serve the area. The Committee
further recognizes , however, that providing additional access
could further compound the existing problem and make the situation
more critical .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . The existing park has been utilized as a facility serving beyond
the immediate neighborhood. The basic result has been an increase
1
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Seven
in traffic circulation problems beyond those created by the
immediate residents of the Hill area.
2. The existing park facility, however, is fully developed and is
used intensively by the community at large. The Renton School District
presently has a 10 acre elementary school site located easterly
of said park. A school development at this site is not contem-
plated at this time or in the near future, due to the limited
elementary population that might potentially attend said school .
NATURAL SYSTEMS :
1 . The Hill area , due to its nature , has large undeveloped hillside
areas with steep slopes , providing a natural greenbelt drainage
system.
2. Disturbance through new development represents a potential hazard
in terms of slides and increased runoff problems .
RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based on its analysis , the Committee recommends as follows :
1 LAND USE:
1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill area ,
the Committee recommends that the Hill area north of the Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission right-of-way be
designated as single family residential .
2. The steep hillside areas , powerline rights-of-way, and natural
drainage courses be established as greenbelt areas , in addition
to those presently designated on the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan .
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Eight
CIRCULATION :
1 . The land use designations as reflected in the existing Compre-
hensive Plan was based upon provision of additional access to the
Renton Hill area to the south and southeast. The extension of
Mill Avenue South is not physically feasible ; and, therefore,
it is recommended by the Committee that such designation on the
Arterial Street Plan be deleted.
2. Extensive input on the part of the residents in the Hill area
indicates the desire to continue the limited access' to the Hill
(Third and Mill ) as it is presently constituted. The purpose of
such limitation is to enhance the amenities of the Hill area as
a residential community and preclude through access. It is ,
therefore , further recommended that the proposed Grant Avenue
connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of
access to the Hill .
3. It is recognized that improved access will be necessary to serve
the properties to the south and southeast of the Renton Hill area
at such time as they are developed. The intent of the Committee ' s
recommendations is that such access be provided from the south .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . Retain the present community facilities designations for the Renton
Hill area , including the park and school site , recognizing that the
use of the school site for an elementary school may or may not be
feasible in the near future.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Nine
2. The Committee further recommends that the City pursue the possibil -
ity of expansion of Phillip Arnold Park to the southeast , since it
appears that the potential area would allow reasonable expansion
of said facility.
3. The area designated low density multi-family residential adjacent
to the Cedar River north of the railroad be redesignated future
recreation .
4</..;-/
October 5 , 1977
Mr. Clark Teegarden, Chairman
Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Committee
Renton Planning Commission
Renton Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055
RE : Comprehensive Land-Use Plan--Renton Hill
Dear Mr. Teegarden:
We appreciate the opportunity you have given to us
to participate in your deliberations as you attempt to resolve
the conflicting demands now being made upon you regarding
proposed changes to the City of Renton Comprehensive Land-
Use Plan. We hope that our input has been helpful to you
in reaching a decision in this matter.
As you put together your recommendations to the
Renton Planning Commission, we sincerely hope that you and
members of your committee will keep our concerns and fears
in mind. The Renton Hill Community Association has again
reviewed the existing Comprehensive Land-Use Plan for the
City of, Renton and would now suggest that the Comprehensive
Land-Use Plan be changed as follows :
1. That the geopraphic area making up Renton Hill be
reclassified and designated as single family residential.
We simply do not fdel that the development of multi-
family housing is compatible with the existing
development of single family residences on Renton Hill .
2 . We would ask that all existing streets on Renton
Hill be permanently designated as "dead-end--no thru"
streets . We see no justification for extending any of
the existing streets to accept additional traffic
through Renton Hill. The existing streets are
presently inadequate to handle existing traffic and
there is no way to widen or improve the existing
streets to handle the increased traffic volume that
would be generated by multi-family development.
3. We suggest that the area located directly south of
Renton Hill be reclassified as medium density multi-
family. In this regard, we suggest that an arterial
street plan be developed to circulate traffic onto
Benson Road or Grant Avenue/Puget Drive rather than
funneling that traffic onto Renton Hill.
4. We request that the area presently zoned as H--1 on
the Northeasterly portion of Renton Hill be designated
as greenbelt or single family residence. We are concerned
that the development of property to the south of this area
might create a situation in which increased traffic would
be permitted to flow through Renton HIll. We therefore
suggest that the area involved be designeated as greenbelt
and that the greenbelt be extended to the school property
located on the extreme southeasterly edge of Renton Hill.
We would likewise ask that no through streets be permitted
onto ,Renton . Hill from any of the property located near the
pipeline right-of-way.
We thank you for the opportunity to make our feelings and
recommendations known to you and sincerely hope that _these
concerns will be included in your committee ' s recommendations.
Respectfully submitted,
AL)
Kathy Keolker, Chairperson
Renton Hill Community Association
,g/c;_t C0/7
pF R -v
U 1/f.
® OFFICE F THE ITY A ORNEY • RE ,C1�� AGTON
POST OFFICE BOX 826. 100 end AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHI •. 1 2sS. � �/i
.45
�' t r vv` NNl YY
p� GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J. RE , ASSISTANT CITY AT RNEY
AT11
tOSEP-0- October 4, 1977 CCj 6 1'
TO: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director 4'S�
/NG
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, Assistant City Attorney
Re: City Council Referral - Renton Hill Petition
.Review of Comprehensive Plan; and Zoning
Dear Gordon:
This Memorandum is in response to your Memorandum of September
28 , 1977 addressed to Mr . Shellan. Since you posed your questions .
in numerical. order, my answers will be in the same order .
1 . "Area-wide zoning" is not defined in the Ordinances
as you mentioned. However, the intent of the legislation would
make it apparent that the Council meant that the Planning Commission
should not be giving recommendations on individual rezone applica-
tions, but should be dealing with a grater area of land which
might be defined as a definite, discrete area of land defined by
natural) geographical or political boundaries , including more than
one ownership.
2 . Yes
3 . Yes
4. ' If the Commission believes it could deal with both
comprehensive plan questions and the zoning questions at the
same public hearing, then there is nothing in the Ordinance system
that would militate against that arrangement. However , that would
appear to be a policy decision to be made by the Commission itself .
5 . In answering question 1 above, and referring to section
2-207 (B) , it would appear that the Planning Commission could make
its recommendation to the Council on the matter of zoning . However ,
I am not sure that the study on the Comprehensive Plan would be
entirely relevant to the question of a zoning change. Of course,
some of the elements will be the same but the Commission should
remember that the Comprehensive Plan is a long range planning
device, while zoning is much more of an absolute action.
I hope this Memo answers the questions that you have posed, but
should you require further information, ease feel free to contact
me.
Lawrence J. W rren
LJW:nd
•
J �; WAY=. o THE CITY OF RENTON
2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055
Z o
o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
p� 235 2550
4TFosEIDIO September 28 , 1977
MEMORANDUM
TO : Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney
FROM : Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL PETITION
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING
The above noted matter was referred to the Planning Commission
and Land Use Hearing Examiner forreview and recommendation .
The matter is presently under study by the Comprehensive Plan-
ning Committee (note attached referral and petition ) .
The committee has requested that I contact you in writing to
clarify the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission under the
new Planning Commission ordinance , as it relates to the zoning
question .
Section 2-207 (B) states that the Planning Commission may make
recommendations to the Council on area-wide zonings . Due to
the lack of a definition of area-wide zoning , the committee
chairman has requested :
( 1 ) Your review and definition of "area-.wide zoning . "
(2 ) Could the Renton Hill area be considered of sufficient
size for area-wide zoning recommendations?
(3 ) Could the Planning Commission at this time review the
zoning of Renton Hill in view of the Council referral ?
(4 ) Could the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing
on the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning question
together or at the same public hearing as separate
items on the agenda?
(5 ) Would it be appropriate for the Planning Commission
to make recommendations to the Council on the matter
of zoning as part of the present Comprehensive Plan
study?
Gerard M. Shellan , City Attorney
September 11 , 1977
Page Two
Your review and comments would be appreciated . Please contact
me , if you have any questions . Thank you.
GYE :wr
Attachment
I N . E R O F F I C E MEMO
Date June 8, 1977
TO : Planning Dept,
FROM: Del Mead
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Petition to Rezone Cedar Avenue South
Referred by the City Council at its regular meeting
of June 6, to the Planning Commission and Land Use
Hearing Examiner for review and recommendation re-
garding Comprehensive Land Use Plan and zoning for .
this area. '
DM:bh
Attach -
•
•
04,
((IRE 18,
fr
IV 2�
JUN 9 1977
/ZG
LUt
P,IAYLi DUILT I IOM173 v.S x EILACCOM May 1977
Y?!ay 1977 M YER EUTLT 1-,:'':.:.3 v.8TI7.7_,.ACOC".4
[No. 17,2._2. Division Two. May /1, 1977.1 • •
'•/I n ''id.•win Wheeler'heeler and Tivt�;::ns' .P1,,-,'b C' Yv7: .ir:r'' i
i, ;,r..a_3, EUILA Hor.::'3 INC.,I
, Appellant V. THE TOWN
('�,.•.�•• Panne respondents.
©_ STEI ::�....OM, ET AL, Recipcndents. ! f
t 6 4:.n:-�.- — Judicial E�'oviow :a- Ar'.:.t_a -'d Ca ri f .. q Inc.,
r.,.t:`:n -- 1L.^,t:'.al:iw:.::t:'.^.'.:. A party.^..��3T�.iI]=' � ]eC�CS3®HSfl R. REED, J.—Mayer �L?1$� �" �::':^.3, A �l,j. �';`,:� � _,
p• Y U that a zoning action I. ti
i.i cliff: _ary and coplicioni boo the burden of proving it was taken
from a superior court Ci? "._� ?1 cf l:^� ?�' �. \
�� Town of S ..cc } „Pi pti,, J^ a}n
v'ii t conaidcr n n" gn a„t and circumstances.A reVlew of tl'iv L�U' �1 �`� u.:� ..
thou _ _cti .n 1 in t:...rc�..rd of facto o � �-,- =' �=�e .•- :1 cl
4 ticn is not invalid .:ie- L t
";�. merely y it prevents the most g = ,. •--�-=� property -•__ r [ ..;
�.,,__ g C1 because' In classification ek��J_ ;�� owned
profitcble uao of property or I�•cCause a different action seems pref- • and (2) seeking compel '` issue p::._�.,: i
E;al)le to to ou__:" thetown �O a
the Court t
[ — construction of an apart:no_It; on the property. On
-�4 c. ning .—Validity CzafIscation ghat Constitutes.The I r? Mayer contends that the acted arbitrarily E__vi
l':• of showing such a diminution of property value resulting C.
thesubjectproperty 1 �� t t: `
p p Y esultin ! . ciously in rezoning and the
from zoning as to amount to a cunfacation is on the person asserting reduced its value as to amount t^ an u_Ico n t tutioncl cc
it. A reduction in the value of a particular >
` property is justified by fiscation. In addition, Mayer challenges the legaa`:vy of
benefit to the public so long as some profitable use of the property
' remains. ordinance passed prior to the now zoning enactment, whi
• (FfI Zoning — Retroactivity — Vested Rights. A landowner does removed from the zoning district certain uses then appli,
not acquire rights under esist.ing regulations until application is
ble to the property. We affirm for the reasons set for
• • made for a building permit, after which a change in the permitted below.
uses does not affect him. In 1962 the Town of Steilaccom adopted a cornpr ehe
sive plan for its future grcv-th. It established various zom:
Nature of Action: The plaintiffs property was affected classifications and assigned most,of the property win t
• t ' an ordinance removing "apartment houses" as a permit-
• corporate limits to a "low c'ensity residential" classificatic
��1 use in an existing zoning classification and by a later the most restrictive then available. In 1963 Mayer acquir
change mge in classification to one which did not permit apart- two parcels so classified. These lay unimproved until 19£
alRetRt houses. In separate actions, the plaintiff challenged when both were rezoned "retail," a class which allowed cc
El1e validity of the later change and sought the issuance of a Lain commercial uses and apartment houses. Mayer th
liniltiing permit for an apartment house. n ti p,;>w,
Y :a�;:; t�;'�:�.:,� built an apartment house on the larger of its two parce
i t.aperior Court: The plaintiff's actions were dismissed property not at issue herein. The smaller parcel, the subje
1?S the Superior Court for Pierce County, Nos. 225146, of this appeal, remained unimproved without any build!]
P(;71, Horace C. Geer, J., on February 28, 1975. permits having been sought for it. Then on June 12, 19i
4'ourt of Appeals: The Court of Appeals finds the zoo- the Town adopted ordinance No. 475, which in part pr
11 actions in cu.stion rat. ,o have been arbitrary and hibited the construction of any "duplex or multi—fami
calaricious or confiscatory and not to constitute improper • dwelling" in the retail use district in which the parcel Is
li+t grim zoning or an invalid retroactive application of a Mayer did not challenge this ordinance at the time.
ztming enactment. The trial court's dismissal is affirmed. Early in 1974, the town planner petitioned for adoptit
�urnaan L. Martin, for appellant. • of ordinance No. 496, which was designed to set up a nt
-zoning classification of "neighborhood commercial" to allc
. • areas of transition between existing commercial Lacs
•{ property and the residential neighborhoods that had grov
560 •
•
MAYER BUILT I`^' S v.E' ^n^" P." Mty 1977 rill En r.UFL1T t-M!`'. E.;TETt_..n„
1 -r_
:�,..=i:: ii.. _ v,:1 gay 1977 i i}
C b �,_� the $ 500 to $10 500 as "r stair r rn3 r? ^.
up nearby. uses allowed inneighborhood ' rJ s :.. � ;� .^' �• i7 ,r. � ..:...
y. :AmongeJ a �'
�, proposedc.� :l;c_l.cc:l cc---=.�_"�..� usage. e - 3 `,
- commercial single-family is �-; '" � .._
zone are homes and duple.ieS d
�� � } multi-family residential ,_., _',.Y_.s-•.�. •- �, t'.o P. _-r^�rr.
• professional and business r s semi-public
' Ii.tllt3-t Iu: ,.: ::
Ctiice3 public and semi-pu c be use; but :co ne t f ` :
Uses, L :1 Gr c beauty chops, travel bureaus,= and " best use; O . .-w� :.cli i:`"'...
1travel bureaus, spe-
permitted in the retail f i_t,:let. 'lire' council c:;::ti cia1Ly stores" dealing in antiques, books, food, flowers, gifts, i_.:.^ 1 i
jewelry Clryr and photography.Zhy. CSYn Cd to reducethe meeting to allow study of the r:i;rts, end upon :-._.oo ..,,,.
gn ordinary ; ing on Mayc-R s _. r
commercial impact t of these uses were such f i 21, 197/1➢ i;, t._�_- assignment of i._...� _
p� features' as � �^ ^^ -L-
rC�tri.^..ti01i9 on building height and sign .°,Irequirement property Tl.iit0-t122 r:^.:�,_'i%.r,:'__ ^, l .,.,i..0 CiCi�l �.?;,^,;.i._,^. ti;,
size, a II.] We consider first ,y ''s argument that the tom....
for side yards, a limitation on number of employees, and a •
1 . S. d e ` it
requirement i'n�.i11. for advance approval of proposed building � councils rezoning of his property l.� must be voided clue to 1_
/.r••
plans. l�iay%r'S peOp.^s'ty was among those.sitessubject to :- arbitrary and capricious t :.�. A �O::ir� act 13 C ii C t
hOsGiles �_� �
judicial review only for r�anifost a'ouse cf^c;ac_ctio.�. 'j',
rezone under this ordinance.
.
party asserting that a legislative cothority has abused it
The matter went first before the town planning commis- discretion by actingarbitrarily capriciously, n with
sion in a public hearing on February 11, 1974, attended by aTc,YL ,ily and e.
out consideration and in disregar f t�Mayer's president and several people living nearMayer's d of �.ic facts, has tli
rc townClarke, of proof; if the zoning classification is fairly d.bat
property. The planner, Dennis Clarke, explained that able, it will be sustained. State ex rel. Myhre v. Spc rn
the proposed creation of a new zoning classification was to
70 Wn.2d 207, 210, 422 P.2d 790 (1967). A municipality'
satisfy the policy of the comprehensive plan, i.e., that corn-
patible land uses should be combined and separated from zoning action should be reviewedwiththe follo:�i^r
approach in as noncompatible uses by buffer strips, transitional uses, and mind, a adopted in Carlson v. Bellevue, 7�
other, similar devices. As things then existed, there was no Wn.2d 41, 51, 435 P.2d 9'57 (1958):
way to buffer residential areas from the noise, traffic and In determining or not a zoningel ordinanceflis
other characteristics of retail use. After hearing comments reasonable in its application t to a given parcel of land
from members of the audience, many of whom were con- I among the factorsT to be takeninto consideration arc
the character of the neighborhood, existing uses anc
cerned about the adverse effect retail use would have on zoning of nearby property, the amount by which prop•
their nearby homes, the planning commission unanimously Q.:., ;Avt: erty values are decreased, the extent to which the dim
inution of values promotes the public health, safety
recommended adoption of the new classification and
'. assignment to it of four parcels, including prayer's- On May morals or welfare, the relative gain to the public a:
7, 1974, the town council conducted a public hearing to compared with the hardship imposed upon the indi-
vidual owner, the suitability of the subject property fa/
consider adoption of the neighborhood commercial zoning . the purpose for which it is zoned, and the length of
position The council heard Mayer's and those of E time the property has remained unimproved, consid-
the town planner and objecting neighbors of the property. ered in the context of the land development in the
Mayer submitted two reports on the financial effect the area. No single factor is controllin but each must
rezone would have on its property. An appraiser opined receive due consideration. But to sustain an attach
upon the validity of a zoning ordinance, an aggrieved
that the highest and best use of the property was for ` property owner must show that if the ordinance is
apartments, in which case it was worth $12,000; this he enforced the consequent restrictions on his pr cperty
contrasted with a value of $5,500 under neighborhood com-
mercial usage. A real estate broker valued the property at
-i •
-
'7(32 Lama MELT 10L 3 v.STEILAC001.1 117.cy 1077
:y E077 1=,R�:��.i:.ko r+F.�l!.J .' an'..-gin C,^z'^- �.n,
its for Cowhich
is reason-
ably I'tv.,.._.J v.ST.E.I,... '3:.`1 f 33
n:oclndee use any purncoe V'ihich it l
al o cd. He is required to show that there
-1 �,.;e �ii: � is ' intersecting the -,-ter,.. .._, .�j
y ee i ty for ra. table use under therestrictions cr property,yiy, <._.:� the f.'_ss.� tocontrol C
p U res r c ,a. , _.
Z�ti .r._:Sii??2�.^., G., nlAn ,'-`i'y'��i;}ST that ^' r and noise in the area. addition,
�' t,
greater part of ; have
the cal;; of the rit, that ,. ,__, .J rc: l
( pre,:cit is -destroyed oyed by although
.f many vc'cc' - a that lam. racy be some u .r'J r f�j j;' useremaining. . ,,,. t:.,e r ,car. at '1. :_-
,Jl_,_ u. Adaptability,
retail L&SeJ v'oui6l 1)i,'. , Salt? [�^ �� �5 `+1.n :.1. .
!L has l:'�si1 declared, �i"3i713 yes E:.G'seorai as well Y - . d }."'Z: } Y?_.G -10 area, v..itl
v -n� c as attendan'q'', tr?{i1c cU'_1z` -:'^i.' `!p noise ' i
functional CFao, arci w zx c3 not the most profitable ! : v; i ,�, i 1 fast,C.. :J w.i114.
LT^G, but thatacme permitted 1ttGd usecan 1 .' pFGf t£i1311te�ble favored e3 E'e^ci9 !r the site 7 ^1 purely ie^;ra at:^` :!
n b (} /t Corpora-
! ' cation, without even the sed. cony�.. Gvt'1:.^,l.�is omitted.) l7 E. �Y�]�'LQ ' dI..:1119 V � � � u lL.ie business ���1'v*L'Li^ .i �.�.a-
(Foo ui Municipal plated under "neighborhoodn T _c.�
25.45,tions at 111 (3d ed. rev. 1976). ; p ^cl�i=crcial, Tile tonn c cis
proceedings of necessity fdi7 - _ d an fo m. fee, i,.l., l"! J AViit!.r tiLu lr_„r,_._:l i'.._.:....^..L, leak-
We ...
agree with the trial court that Mayer failed in its �' „rt, t
Foci the niceties of f,°;+,ai�yoGl evidentiary 43 ¢7-..}
burden of proving the ordinance was adopted arbitrarilyY�ry :�_
and capriciously. Mayer '+'` the interested citizens could ='tyrees their T�
relies heavily on the opinions as to e ti r vi p The zoning
decision, therefore, was based on c i a1Gn and spccu!ation cs
reduction in value presented to the council, which allegedly
1 to the future of the area and the need to establish the sub-
demonstrate that the rezone would preclude use of the
ject property as a transitional area according to the co n,-
property for "any useful purpose to which it is reasonably prehensive Withplan. r n
adapted." There are, however, certain deficiencies associ- the trial „ourt, we agree it would
ated with reliance on the opinion letters. Neither letter have been preferable for the town council to have based its
decision on a more factual basis. We believe, nevertheless,
compared the property's value if used for purposes allowed that the zoning ordinance has under neighborhood commercial zoning with uses permittedordinance support in the record and is
under the current retail classification: Instead, both worked not a "wilful and unreasoning action, in disregard of facts
and circumstances." Northern Luc. 7'ycnsp, Co, v.
from the premise that the highest and best use would be for q ,,
Washington Utils. c;a �razsp. Camm'n, 69-1vVn.2d 472, 478,
apartments, and compared that value of the property with 418 P.2d 735 (1966). Where there is room for two opinions,
its value if zoned neighborhood commercial; this approach I a zoning
exer-
ignored the fact that apartments were no longerpermitted action is not arbitrary and capricious when g cised honestly and upon due consideration, even though a
under the retail classification, and that the council was
a different conclusion might have been reached. Bisho v.
a w
being asked to consider an alleged devaluation of the prop- Houghton, 69 Wn.2d 786 420 P.2d 368 (1966). p
erty if changedusesti¢o � "retail" f
from permitted under to those We turn next to the allegedlyconfiscatory aGssible under "neighborhood commercial." In addition, application of
;` the zoning ordinance to Mayer'suyer s 8,property. 691r relies
neither letter explained the method of valuation employed
upon Hauser v. Arness, 44 Wn.2d 35 237 P.2d (1954),
in arriving at the stated figures, and one author expressly ! which contains lans
disclaimed any status as a competent appraiser. 1Juage supportive of property rights, such
The trial court characterized the case in supportas the following at page 369:
of a Zoning laws that result in relatively little gain or benefit
rezone as "skinny." It consisted primarily of the town to the public while inflicting serious injury or loss on the
planner's dissertations on a purpose of the comprehensive f . _ property owner have always been held by this court to be
plan to impose buffer zones between commercial and resi- { confiscatory and void.
dential activities, the progression of the area to a residen- Mayer argues that the opinion letters show a severe reduc-
tial neighborhood, the projected future for the roads j tion in value, that the public would gain little from the
rezone, and that the action amounts to a confiscation.
e- 561 MAYER BUILT ECM v.STEILA000M May 1977 May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACeei.i 5S5
[2] We have noted the failure of the opinion letters to Section 1 of ordinance No. 475 provides:
competently demonstrate that the rezone from "retail" to The intent of this ordinance is to establish certain
"neighborhood coniii lercial" would diminish the property's interim zoning modifications in the zoning code of the
value. While we agree there must be some benefit to the Town pending the adoption of a new comprehensive plan
public before a zoning decision will be allowed to diminish and new zoning ordinance, and to prohibitdevelopment
•
of a nature which appears contrary to the intent of the
the value of property, here the public in the form of many present comprehensivethe
area residents, argued that they would be benefited bythe p plan and general welfare of
"� residents, g '' :� the citizens of th,, Town.
uses permitted under a rezone and, indeed, would .prefer Despite the use of the word "interim" in the
above
•
section,
Fen greater restrictions. Moreover, the opinion letters of we do not believe that it is in fact an interim zoning ordi
J � oe„, ? r3�-
i�rvayer s appraisers spoke of a reduction in value of approx- nance. There is no reference to any emergency situation,
imately one-half, but there was no evidence the property W 11 nor is there any indication in the ordinance or elsewhere in
could not be put to a profitable use, as required by Carlson s the record that the Town deviated from the regular notice
v. Bellevue, supra. By way of comparison, in Carlson the E3
it and hearing procedures specified in ROW 35.63.100 et seq.
court upheld a rezone that allegedly reduced the value of 1 Ordinance No. 475 in fact makes several substantive
the property from $60,000 to $2,500. It is with poor grace
11 changes in the zoning code. It reclassifies several tracts of
that Mayer complains`rof a reduction in value when it land, eliminates two use districts, amends the comprehen-
acquired the property at a time when it was zoned more sive plan, and, as pertinent here, redefines the retail use
restrictively than "neighborhood commercial," then q district so as to prohibit the construction of duplexes and .
obtained an apparently greater valuation due to a 1967 is multi-family units. These zoning changes, being permanent
change but chose not to build as then permitted, and now ' to the extent any zoning ordinance is permanent until
begrudges the town's attempt to fall back to an intermedi- modified or replaced by a later one, are sustainable as an
ate zoning position. In any event, Mayer has not borne its i. attempt "to prohibit development . contrary to the
burden of showing such a diminution in value as to amount intent of the present comprehensive plan." (Italics ours.)
a confiscation. See t1 1<'r..-Anderson, American Law of li
We cannot agree with Mayer's contention that the ordi-
�_,-�� n 3.25 (2d ed. �.9e6)." : . . .. E,. n
U 1J • . nailed is an example of interim zoning Which must fall
i.e.,inally we address �l enge� ". 475, c....n:
because it fails to declare a termination date and was not
the c12a.1 to mrdinance 'lo: I,
e that it is an example of illegal <;intern zoning" and . passed as an emergency measure. That it does not contain
that'it should be applied to parcels zoned "retail"-only after i
these elements is further evidenev that the'To -ri simply"the effective date of the Ordinance: ,.;.::_:: enacted changes in its existing zoning laws to.effectuate the
Interim -zoning 'describes a process-Whereby a govern- purposes of its them existing comprehensive plan; such an
mental body in response to an emergency situation tempo- <<r' •'� .�! Ordinance vfias within the ToWil s authority. .11/1cldauohton v.
racily establishes an ordinance to classify or regulate uses of :;r . Boeing, 68 Wn.2d 650 414 P.2d 778 (196.6).
land pending either revision 'of the'e xisting zoning code-or :;-: :. ti _ [3] The rule on retroactivity of zoning changes is that
adoption of a final, omprehensive zoning. plan: '1 A. - : application for a building permit vests in the applicant the
Ra.tlikoof, The Law of Zoning-and .Plan;2ing §' 11.01'(4th } right to use his property permitted, and that a sub-
ed. 1S75); Smith v. �'datrUip �'oU:zt`y,,75.yirs.2el 715, 453 P.2d g- as then l,.
_:,�, - . .sequent change of zone cannot divest hum of that right.
832 (iJ39); see'RCW 38.7G.790.- ' f4'` f • State ex rel. Ogden v. Bellevue, 45 Wn.2d 492, 275 p.2d
'' 5G J MAYER BUILT HOMES v.as 1Lt?COOM May 1977 May 1977 BOVYv.G �::.1i.2,CCTa'y?1 t'JAr a CL17 56'7
899 (1954). Mayer had not, however" '' 1for a permit to The judgment is affirmed.
build a structure on its property w- aes permitted PETRIE, C.J., and RINCOLD, J. Pro Tern., concur.
under the retail classification prior to adoption of ordinance
No. 475. The ordinance, on its face, limits the uses for
property in the then existing retail use district. Once the 4
ordinance disallowed certain uses within the retail district, '
Mayor's property was subject to the reduced usages possi-
ble, no other use having vested. ..
Although not explicitly argued, Mayer's challenge to the
retroactivity of the Tom e.fs zoning changes is subject to g°: [No. 2518-2. Division Two. May 11, 1977.]
another interpretation. Ordinance Igo. 475 forbade the con- ,,
struction of multi-family dwellings on Mayer's property, Y DAVID L. �ov�t, espondent, V. GRAHAM, COHEN
having eliminated that use from the retail district. The f & WAMPOLD, ET AL, Appellants.
effect was to prevent such construction until passage of [1] Partnership — Duties of Partners— Disclosure — In Con-
ordinance No. 496, so that it would have been futile for {j oral. A partnership is a fiducia<-y relationship which imposes on
i e , r' each partner a high standard of utmost good faith and undivided
Mayer to have applie�3 for a p rmit to build a multi-family y,
is loyalty, including a duty to make a full disclosure of any inform
fact, Mayer's argument can be interpreted to be that, if
structure after adoption of ordinance No. 475. Given that ]� tion which is material to the affairs or property of the partnership.
ti I21 Partnership — Duties of Partners — Disclosure — !Niece-
ordinance No. 475 is invalid, then the result must be that lution Idregotiations. A.partner's duty to fully disclose material
Mayer would have been entitled to obtain a multi-family -0; facts affecting th© partnership business continues during, and is
permit up until passage of ordinance No. 496, which could t. undiminished by, negotiations to dissolve the partnership. A part-
not lawfully relate back to the passage of an earlier, invalid x" . ner's failure to disclose certain facts during negotiation of an agree-
ordinance so as to prevent the construction of multi-family ment among the partners precludes him from obtaining specific
dwellings prior to ordinance No. 4°i5. lIn sum, if ordinance 'j performance of that agreement.
No. 496 validly prohibits multi-family dwellings on Mayer's :.::.t;er-r Nature of Action Action by one member of a former
property, it does so only as of its•own'effective date, and : .y
-..' {:: law Partnership seeking specific performance of an agree-
invalidation of Ordinance No. 475 would, until that date, . i ment between the partners relating to the division of
leave Mayer,v,there it wc.s before adoption of ordinance No: income upon winding up the partnership. The other part-
475,'namely, able" to build a""multi-family dwelling as then _ filers refused to perform because of the plaintiff's failure to
permitted in "retail." TLs ark anent, however, is premised '``5 disclose information affecting, the c^ reean�Ct.
:. on the invalidity. of ordinance No. 475. With that ordinance it', . g�
having been upheld, the argument falls. Superior Curt: A decree of specific performance was
entered by the Superior Court for King County, No.
'` 788 Court of {�
788109, Albert N. Bradford, J., on June 26, 1976.
pp. en The court holds that specific perfor-
" anance is not available to the plaintiff because he failed to
s:
•
p F R�,
r r 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o °' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�A co-
0 Q. 235 - 255J
'FO SEP1c 0 September 28 , 1977
MEMORANDUM
TO : Gerard M. Shella.n, City Attorney
FROM : Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL PETITION
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING
•
The above noted matter was referred to the Planning Commission
and Land Use Hearing Examiner for review' and recommendation .
The matter is presently under study by the Comprehensive Plan-
ning Committee (note attached referral and petition ) .
The committee has requested that' I contact you in writing to
clarify the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission under the
new Planning Commission ordinance , as it relates to the zoning •
question .
•
Section 2-207 (B) states that the Planning Commission may make
recommendations to the Council on area-wide zonings . Due to
the lack of a definition of area-wide zoning, the committee
chairman. has requested :
( 1 ) Your review and definition of "area-wide zoning. "
(2 ) Could the Renton Hill area be considered of sufficient
size for area-wide zoning recommendations?
(3 ) Could the Planning Commission at, this time review the
zoning of Renton Hill in view of the Council . referral ?
(4 ) Could the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing
on the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning question
together or at the same public hearing as separate
items on the agenda?
' (5 ) Would it be appropriate for the Planning Commission
to make recommendations to the Council on the matter
of zoning as part of the present Comprehensive Plan
• study?
•
Gerard M. Shellan , City Attorney
September 11 , 1977
Page Two
Your review and comments would be appreciated. Please contact
me , if you have any questions . Thank you.
GYE :wr
Attachment
i o INTEROFFICE MEMO
Date June 8, 1977
TO : Planning Dept.
FROM: Del Mead
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Petition to Rezone Cedar Avenue South
Referred by the City Council at its regular meeting
of June 6, to the Planning Commission and Land Use
Hearing Examiner for review and recommendation re-
garding Comprehensive Land Use Plan and. zoning for
this area.
_ z^A
DM:bh = - .
Attach
‘Of 174
RILEF.IVE0
c,ii JUN 9 1977 '
,,S-
eDEpP ,/
/Ut
pF R�
4 v?, Lam?
ti 4, 0
U ArL'. 1.
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON
o .= ..,j y, . POST OFFICE BOX E2E. 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON OBOB5 255-8O78
(0'
) GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
47-
FDSEPiE0 September 21, 1977
•
Mrs . Delores Mead
City Clerk
City, Hall
Renton , WA 98055 •
Re : Renton Hill moratorium resolution
Dear Del:
We have prepared and are enclosing herewith original and one
copy of a Resolution for a certain moratorium on construction
in the Renton Hill area. Although we do not have too many
details on this matter, we believe that. the grounds specified
in the resolution are sufficient to support such a moratorium.
Would you please have the Public Works Director verify the
• description to be sure it covers the proper area.
We remain ,
Yours very truly ,
Gerard E. Shellan
GMS :ds
inc.
cc : Members of Council
Mayor
Public Works Director
Planning Director
Secretary, Planning Commission
• %� pECF�!I o
SEP 23 1977
DEP_,/
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of .the City of Renton , together
with its committees , has been and is now studying and reviewing proposed
amendments to the City' s Comprehensive Plan within certain areas of
the City , and
WHEREAS such study and review also includes an area in the City
generally known as"Renton Hill" , as hereinafter more particularly
described, and
WHEREAS it has been determined, on a preliminary basis , that
serious problems may result in said area if unlimited construction
were permitted for any multiple dwelling. , commercial or industrial
purposes , due to insufficient and inadequate street access , circuity
traffic pattern , means of ingress and egress ,and such existing problems
may seriously affect the public health , safety and well being of the
community , and in particular the residents within the hereinbelow
described area, and
WHEREAS it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City to
establish a moratorium on certain construction pending completion of
the present studies and reviews , including public hearings thereon,
NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION I : The above statements and recitals are hereby found
to be true and correct in every respect.
SECTION II : In furtherance of the public health , safety and
general welfare , there is hereby declared a moratorium for the
construction, improvement and alteration of any multiple apartment
buildings , commercial and industrial facilities of every type and
nature , for a period of ninety (90) days from date hereof , and relating
to the following described territory:
All that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 17 , Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E.
W.M. , lying east of FAI 405 and south of Chicago-St.Paul Milwaukee
and Pacific Railroad. Together with all that portion of the NW 1/4
of Sec. 20 Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E.W.M. , lying East of FAI 405 and
North of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission
line easement.
-1-
In the event that the study and review of the City' s Comprehensive
Plan and related documents as same affect the abovedescribed area
have not been completed within said ninety day period , then this
moratorium shall be renewed, without further action of the City Council ,
for an additional period of sixty (60) days.
The aforespecified moratorium shall not apply to existing apartne
single family or duplex dwellings or the renovation, repair or
maintenance of same.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 1977 .
Delores A. Mead, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 1977 .
Charles Delaurenti , Mayor
Approved as to form:
Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney
-2-
l'
I,
1
1 .
. • 1
. .
• .
• A'Z
--eA`-7-..-N/e7 5-: . 9(/,', K_-x• _-S
( 7 i ,'..)
• 7:;-_-:.---4--.---.7;,- -;--.--7-, .:• r---•--7:.:,--77-- .../._ .:,:•.•..;. .---'.;2--_,-- -'-•/ t/' Zi ;
i
2 - ? -r --?:" ,1 7-(',y2/2-???T'(..•=--z( / f•:::,--
•-.,-...,, ,,,, •..- :, - • ,,- F 1 I ' '
4-54S.'- 2 2 as .2io sarvoc C. )07 )\I I - 1 „ N .
/065-el ...9Z-Z.4 .
W4j. -----
--- -2(-/----)
IM75 ---S -0 9 _ --r-3441u 9--
2-z-e•b --_,F,::--c?; ,li r7„ . "/" -,,,,._„.. , ., / . _,
' (r -'26---/ Ly,y:74 . - _________
002_9 -_c_51f------Pei_ILS /21/yz OS- v 509, /11.9 0
05 ?,/iy Jopdo ef_c Jc.)?fiodN XLio ..11
_ 1
/ ..,
--- -11
_.. , ,
-t._. -,,„ , -_, - (,, 4/7/ 1 .; ,,c:7....:..) " 2 --,-`
:-_, Y .'( •
Renton Planning Commison
Public Hearing Meeting
September 14 , 1977
Page Two
Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Avenue South , Renton , noted she is Chair-
man of the Renton Hill Community Association and stated that the
petitions submitted represented 154 out of 280 households and that
more signatures were forthcoming this evening . She referred the
Commission to the Renton Hill Community Association letter of
September 10 , 1977 , in which specific concerns and recommendations
were listed, and indicated that they would be discussed more fully
this evening by individual residents chosen by their neighbors .
Mrs . Koelker stated that they oppose multi -family or industrial
development on or in the vicinity of Renton Hill for the following
reasons : it would have severe detrimental impacts ; street widths
are not sufficient and have a maximum amount of traffic volume ;
access is limited ; parking is insufficient ; it would affect the
low crime rate ; the historical value of Renton Hill should be pre-
served ; and the residents wish to maintain the pride of ownership
evident in the community. She then introduced the next neighbor-
hood representative , Claude Rogers .
Claude Rogers , 420 Renton Avenue , Renton , discussed traffic condi -
tions , noting the limited width of the streets , limited access , and
potential impact on traffic should multi -family development and/or
another access occur.
Margaret Jernigan , 412 Mill Avenue South , Renton , described the
safety and security of the neighborhood , noting it has the lowest
crime rate in the city. It is the neighborhood ' s opinion that
this is due to the limited access , and it is requested that the
deadend streets be retained permanently.
Ruth Larson , 714 High Avenue South , Renton , indicating that she was
speaking for the children of the community , expressed opposition to
further multi -family development , which could involve the need for
additional school buses and access to the community, thus creating
hazardous. conditions for school children waiting for school buses .
Amelia Telbin , 508 Cedar Avenue South , Renton , indicating that she
had lived in the community for 69 years , discussed the history and
development of the community and noted that it had always been a
predominantly single family residential area . She also noted that
many residents are second and third generation families and asked
that the integrity of the neighborhood be preserved .
Jim Breda , 1002 Grant Avenue South , Renton , discussed the unique
character of Renton Hill , noting that while it is an old community ,
it is comprised of primarily new and old single family residences
and residents from a wide range of age groups , who are homeowners .
He suggested that other areas of the city would be appropriate for
multi -family development .
Mrs . Koelker , Chairman of the Renton Hill Community Association ,
thanked the Commission for listening to their concerns and intro-
duced their attorney , Robert McBeth , who would discuss possible
solutions .
Robert E . McBeth , 505B South Third Street , Renton , indicated that it
is his opinion that the Commission can consider zoning because of
the referral from the Council . Mr . McBeth reviewed the problems
caused by further multi -family development--the need for access from
two points to meet ordinance requirements , impact on traffic , impact
on children ' s safety , and the need to preserve the quality of the
neighborhood. He stated that the community is asking that the
Comprehensive Plan be changed from multi -family designations adjacent
to Cedar Avenue to single family . In addition , they request that
there be no through streets on Renton Hill , that the R- 3 zoned area
be changed to single family residential , that the area of R-4 zoning
be changed to a less dense designation , and that the heavy industry
designation and H- 1 zoning on the north side of Renton Hill be
changed to single family or greenbelt . He also requested that the
Commission expedite its review so that the character of the community
will not be changed .
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING MEETING
SEPTEMBER 14, 1977
MINUTES
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT : Thomas Buckingham, Brian Gain , Logan Garrison ,
Sandra Gist , Anthone Mola , Barbara Schellert , Clark Teegarden , Joan Walker .
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None .
PRESS : Cathy Burke , Record Chronicle .
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director ; Willis Roberts ,
Recording Secretary .
1 • CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walker at 8 : 02 p . m . , who
led the audience in the Pledge 'of Allegiance .
2• INTRODUCTION OF NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONER:
Newly appointed Commissioner , Barbara Schellert , was introduced and
welcomed to the Commission by the Chairman .
3 . ROLL CALL was taken by Acting Secretary Mola . All responded
present with the exception of Commissioner Gist , who was expected to
arrive later (arrived at 8 : 25 p . m. ) .
4 • APPROVAL OF MINUTES :
It was decided to defer approval of the minutes until the next meet-
ing , October 12 , 1977 .
5 . OLD BUSINESS :
COUNCIL REFERRAL:
PETITION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA , PAR-
TICULARLY THE MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE
VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH .
THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405
ON THE WEST , CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH , THE HILLSIDE AND.
UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST , AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY
ON THE SOUTH .
Noting the petition from residents to review the Comprehensive Plan
in the Renton Hill area , the Chairman requested a review by the
Planning Director .
Mr. Ericksen noted that the matter had been referred to the Planning
Commission by the City Council . He indicated that the Commission ' s
area of initial concern is the Comprehensive Plan , although the
referral relates to both the Comprehensive Plan and zoning in the
area . He then pointed out the area under review on the Comprehen-
sive Plan map and discussed the various land use designations that
currently apply.
The Chairman referred the Commission to the original petition from
the community dated June 8 , 1977 , and another petition dated
August 26 , 1977 , requesting Comprehensive Plan review, and noted
that the petitions contained a total of 237 signatures . She then
called for questions from the Commission . As none were offered ,
the Chairman invited comments from the audience .
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
September 14 , 1977
Page Four
Bill Collins , 420 Cedar Avenue South , Renton , suggested that when
any existing apartments on the west side of Cedar Avenue South
reach the condition where they have to be replaced , a provision
be made that the area is reverted to the single family zoning in
the vicinity .
Mr. McBeth discussed further the amenities with regard to the apart-
ments already constructed , the matter of the freeway and topography
forming a natural buffer from the downtown core , the substandard
streets and traffic problems , and the impact of multi -family
development on the neighborhood .
John Giuliani , 1400 South 7th , Renton , asked if the Planning Commis-
sion would actually visit the area and was advised Wthe Chairman
that they would .
Noting no further audience input , IT WAS MOVED BY GAIN , SECONDED BY
GIST, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED.
Discussion among the Commissioners followed relative to the appro-
priateness of closing the hearing at this time .
On the question , MOTION FAILED.
Ruth Larson asked what protection the community has that the project
cannot be continued , if the public hearing is closed and the matter
referred to committee.
The Chairman requested advice from the Planning Director. Mr . Erick-
sen stated that he would have to consult with the City Attorney
regarding the zoning question , but that there is no question that the
Commission can review the Comprehensive Plan , the arterial plan , and
street patterns in the area . He suggested that the public hearing
be continued to October 12th and the matter be referred to committee
for specific report .
Following a brief discussion , IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING
REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW IN. THE RENTON HILL AREA BE
CONTINUED UNTIL OCTOBER 12, 1977, AND THAT THE MATTER BE REFERRED
TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK
AT THAT TIME.
Discussion followed concerning clarification of the Council ' s
referral . It was the consensus that the elements of the Comprehen-
sive Plan should be reviewed , and in the meantime , the legality of
the review of the zoning would be checked .
On the question , MOTION CARRIED .
Commissioner Teegarden , Chairman of the Comprehensive Planning Com-
mittee , announced that the committee will meet at 7 : 30 p . m. on
September 21 , 1977 , and invited community representatives and Mr .
Farrell to attend . Mr. Teegarden also asked that the Planning
Director look into the question of Planning Commission review of
the zoning in the subject area and advise the committee .
A recess was declared by the Chairman at 10 : 08 p . m. The meeting was
resumed at 10 : 30 p . m . with all members noted above in attendance .
5- ADMINISTRATIVE:
A. PLANNING COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT
The Chairman referred the Commissioners to a final draft of the
Planning Commission annual report and invited any additions ,
corrections , or revisions .
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
September 14 , 1977
Page Three
The Chairman noted that the public hearing this evening was adver-
tised as relating to the Comprehensive Plan ; and , therefore , con-
sideration is limited to that subject . The Planning Director indi -
cated that the legal aspects of Planning Commission jurisdiction
would be looked into .
Gene Farrell , 11112 Rainier Avenue and 280 Hardie S . W. , Renton ,
developer of the condominiums at the south end of Cedar Avenue
South , stated that while he felt Renton Hill had the attributes
of a fine neighborhood , it could use some outside economic help .
He indicated that it was his opinion that forcing people to seek
this type of housing elsewhere would be a form of zoning discrimi -
nation and reminded the Commission that condominiums are a form of
single family ownership . He then described the housing being
offered arid displayed a sketch of the type of development being
discussed . Mr. Farrell noted the history of his involvement on
Renton Hill , which includes land ownership since 1969 . He dis-
cussed the impact of the development with regard to view obstruc-
tion , the type of purchasers anticipated , the division between
single family residential development and multi -family development
at Cedar Avenue South , preservation of natural areas , and a possible
PUD concept . He noted that the property is properly zoned for the
proposed construction and offered to work with the Planning Com-
mission , City of Renton , and the community regarding its develop-
ment .
Questions by the Commission followed relative to access , location ,
size , ownership , characteristics , and current zoning of the property
involved and its relationship to the city core area .
The Chairman called for further questions and comments from the
audience .
Mario Gotti , 105 High Avenue South , Renton , stated that he is still
concerned about the impact of multi -family development on access ,
traffic circulation , and the condition of the streets .
Mary L . Gustine , 910 High Avenue South , Renton , noting that she
sells real estate and is familiar with the condominium development ,
indicated her opposition and that of the neighborhood to further
multi -family development on the Hill .
Winfred K. Moore , 539 Cedar Avenue South , Renton , expressed his con-
cern regarding access and undersized street widths in the area and
the potential aggravation of the already congested traffic . He
stated that he had chosen to live on Renton Hill because it is quiet
and wished it to remain that way .
L . W. Wollam, 310 Renton Avenue South , Renton , inquired if an impact
statement had been required concerning the proposed development . The
Planning Director advised that an impact statement may be required
based on plans submitted . However , in this instance Mr . Ericksen
said he is not aware of any plans having been submitted .
Ted Weber , 1502 Beacon Way South , Renton , described hazardous traf-
fic conditions on Renton Avenue South .
Rosemary Grassi , 422 Cedar Avenue South , described her concerns regard-
ing traffic conditions on Cedar and indicated that she would not want
to buy a home across the street from a condominium.
Norm Nelson , 901 Jones Avenue South , Renton , stated that his concern
relates to the possibility of any future multi -family development .
Mr . Farrell responded that plans had not been presented to the City
because he wanted to see the outcome of this review and what to
expect in the way of opposition . He indicated that they desire to
respect the wishes of the community .
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
September 14 , 1977
Page Six
De PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE
Commissioner Teegarden suggested that the Commission meet as a
body every month rather than on alternate months and as neces-
sary, as at present. He stated that this was based upon the
feelings of a number of Commissioners that they were function-
ing as three separate entities rather than as a committee-of-
the-whole . He stated it is his opinion every other meeting
could be devoted to general discussion and education so that
it would give more opportunity for communication as a body .
Discussion among the Commissioners ensued relative to sched-
uling of work sessions , appropriate meeting places , public
notice , possible subjects for discussion , and alternatives to
regular scheduling of work sessions . It was generally agreed
that the Planning Commission schedule would be left as at pre-
sent with each Commissioner having the prerogative of suggesting
a special meeting as necessary or desirable .
E. OTHER
1 . TIME LIMIT FOR INDIVIDUAL PUBLIC INPUT
The Chairman inquired regarding the Commission ' s opinion
regarding a five minute time limitation for each speaker
from the public . It was generally agreed that the Chair-
man would continue to attempt to limit each speaker to
five minutes as much as possible .
2 . PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON FALL CONFERENCE
It was noted that the Planning Association of Washington'
has scheduled its 1977 fall session for November 2-4 in
Spokane , and the theme will be " Local Planning . " Several
Commissioners indicated an interest in attending , and IT
WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE COMMISSION
AUTHORIZE AS MANY COMMISSION MEMBERS TO GO TO THE P.A . W.
FALL CONFERENCE IN SPOKANE AS POSSIBLE, IF AVAILABLE
FUNDS WILL PERMIT. MOTION CARRIED.
Discussion followed in which it was noted that the subject
could be of interest to Council members as well , and IT
WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GARRISON, THAT THE COMMIS-
SION COMMEND THE P.A . W. 1977 FALL CONFERENCE TO THE COUNCIL
FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION AND ATTENDANCE. MOTION CARRIED.
As there w no further business before the Commission , IT WAS MOVED BY
GIST , SEC D D BY GAIN , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED . MOTION CARRIED .
The meet . n was adjourned at 11 : 10 p . m.
andra Gist , Secretary Joan Walker , Chairman
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
September 14 , 1977
Page Five
Chairman Walker requested that the first sentence in the sec-
ond paragraph of the Goals and Policies Committee Annual
Report be revised to read : "An examination of the existing
Comprehensive Plan revealed that the policy statement is
inadequate and out of date for the new Land Use Hearing Exami -
ner System. " Commissioner Garrison noted that changes he had
requested during review of the preliminary draft had been made .
Mr. Ericksen advised that the table listing the applications
that had been reviewed by the Planning Commission during the
1976- 77 period had been revised to reflect activity through
August 31 , 1977 . IT WAS THEN
ACTION:
MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY GAIN, THAT THE PLANNING COMMIS-
SION APPROVE THE 1976-77 ANNUAL REPORT AS CORRECTED THIS EVENING
AND REQUEST THAT IT BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL. MOTION
CARRIED.
B. COMMITTEE REPORTS
1 . COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE
Chairman Teegarden indicated that he did not have a report
this evening , as the committee had not met the last few
weeks due to vacations .
2 . ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Chairman Garrison referred the Commission to a memorandum
from the committee to all Commissioners regarding the
proposed P- i zone amendment , noting that this was the
result of a request for study by the Comprehensive Plan-
ning Committee in connection with the review of the Com-
prehensive Plan for the South Renton Planning Area . He
asked the Commissioners to review the proposed amendment
and submit their revisions to the staff so that they may
be incorporated into another draft for consideration at
the October 12th meeting .
Mr . Garrison also reported the committee ' s progress to
date regarding their review of the Zoning Code .
Chairman Walker indicated that by general agreement the
proposed P- 1 zone amendment offered by the Ordinance
Development Committee would be considered by the Commission
at the October 12 , 1977 , meeting .
3 . GOALS AND POLICIES COMMITTEE
Chairman Walker noted that the committee is reviewing
the goals and policies statement for the second time and
hopes to have it ready for Commission consideration in
October .
4 . LIAISON COMMITTEE
Commissioners Walker and Garrison advised that they had
met with the Council Planning and Development Committee
on September 8th . The proposed goals and policies state-
ment was discussed , and it is intended to have it ready
for Liaison Committee review at the November 3rd meeting .
C. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
The Chairman announced that Commissioner Schellert is assigned
to the Goals and Policies Committee .
September 10, 1977
To : The Renton Planning commission �j p `;'_�fL�
Thomas Buckingham
Brian Gain SEP 19 i�t7 7
Logan Garrison
Sandra Gist f " ----------- ` %�'
Anthone Mola ,�
9
Clark Teegarden
Joan Walker - Chairman
From: The Renton Hill Community Association
Dear Commissioners:
On September 8, 1977, the Renton Hill Community
Association met and discussed the question of zoning and
comprehensive plan for the Renton Hill area. As
chairperson of the Association, I am making our_ specific
concerns and recommendations known to you prior to the
Public Hearing on September 14, 1977.
A clear majority of the property owners of Renton
Hill (to this date 237 signatures) recommend that the
City of Renton change the zoning and comprehensive plan
for the Renton Hill area in the following manner:
1 . All streets on Renton Hill that are currently
"dead end" streets should be permanently designated as
"dead end - no thru street" . Opening and/or extending
Renton Hill streets to meet other existing streets would
only funnel more traffic through aneighborhood that is
already severely congested. There is no reasonable way
to widen or improve streets to allo tra-f-f-io
volume .
2. The area currently zoned R-3 should be rezoned
to it' s original R-1 status allowing for existing buildings
under R-3 classification.
3. The first R-4 area directly south of Renton Hill
should be rezoned R-2. Access to this area should be
provided by making a loop road connecting Grant Avenue
(the portion south of Renton Hill, not on Renton Hill)
to Eagle Ridge Drive. This would give good access to
Page 2
that area to Benson Road and Puget Drive without using
Renton Hill' s congested srteets.
4. We request a rezone of the H-1 designation that
is actually on Renton Hill to R-1 . This would account
for about 1/3 the existing H-1 area. This property is
unsuitable for industrial development due to topography
and access and the land use designation is not compatible
with the existing neighborhood.
We make these recommendations based on the following
concerns:
1 . Traffic volume is already a problem. These old,
hilly, narrow streets were never designed for high volume
traffic. Even the recent street improvement on Cedar
Avenue South has not reduced traffic problems.
2. Access is a complex concern. The access problem
would be intolerable with the addition of heavy traffic
caused by a sudden increase in population that apartment
complexes would cause.
3. Children's safety and school bussing are growing
problems. There are 'no elementary or junior high schools
within walking distance of Renton Hill so children must
ride the bus. If there was a surge in population the
bussing problem would increase. The only safe place
for children to play is at the park on top of the hill
which is a fair hike for little ones who live farther
down the hill.
4. The crime rate is very low on Renton Hill.
ohs ider '^ _ that arc ^a ;aecnt to the—downt
district, that is quite remarkable. We think part of .
our low crime rate is due to the location of the police
station which must be passed to get out of the area.
Also, neighbors watch out for each other and pay attention
to anything unusual.
5. Most of Renton Hill is view property. We ' d like
to keep our views of mountains, valley, city lights and
Lake Washington instead of looking into someone ' s kitchen
window in a tall apartment building.
Page 3
6. The quality of our neighborhood is also at risk.
We have a unique community. It's quiet, people are friendly,
there is a low turn-over rate in renters and owners and
once people live on Renton Hill they usually stay. People
are not afraid to go out after dark because our community
is quite safe. The addition of apartment units would
change the quality of our neighborhood and would have a
detrimental impact on our existing, long established
community.
7. Renton Hill has historic value. It is one of
the oldest residential area of the city and, unlike many
old neighborhoods, ours is not deteriorating. Several
homes on Renton Hill have been homes of past leaders and
settlers of Renton.
8. We also have pride of ownership. The reason
our .area_is_not__..deteriorating is because the property
owners are spending thousands of dollars to remodel
and restore these beautiful old homes. We care about
our homes and we are willing to fight to keep our
neighborhood intact.
We have made specific suggestions and have shared the
concerns which prompted us to take action. We would be
happy to meet in committee with the Planning Commission
to discuss our recommendations and help provide any
information we can to assist you in making a recommendation.
We feel no good purpose can be served by changing the
quality of our neighborhood by the addition of apartment
complexes. We wauL to save Renton Hill and raise our
children here in the same atmosphere of safety and trust
as our parents raised many of us in the early years on
Renton Hill.
Sincerely, ;
Kathy eolker, Chairperson
Renton _Hill_Community Association
532 Cedar Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
255-0936
� f
ENJTONJI L L. •
COM r, u A550CrATI 0 N
Is iloW Or ani z ' Ng to save our
ne_ i h bor hood . j PIe.ase.
brin3
dour n` I9 h bo rs OMCL Come ±-0v_s_Lq12
cormrnum -Ey ree -Ein on THUR5Z11V ,
<SEPTm GE R fq77 00 P. rn>
a± the Renton Public LibrQry0 We. (AA II
be share n EceCt5 QQnd prepare n13 -For -Eke.
Renton P( ctnn , r Con rni ss ion s PubIiG
,Farr1\5 on . 5eptem ben l&l±k at 3... 00 P . ni ,
at Re.vtor. CI-CI-Ly Figie . The cbue5tion of
al\owirc' ((Inge apcu-' men-L o1euc2Ior oneht5
an Renton l3 @
will haQe qn oppontvn•t- to' Voice. our
ini
o � onsa
Two pe -Mors a ainst apartment
cornpleys_es have rec€ ec.. � s iJ natures ,
.
More. are veered (mot. tkose, who l have ;lot
51 pea csji ( I be clble -to do so Sep±&&' ber- < th .
P4e_a5 € Come. ci no` Coll-EAr'i bU ice "tv tk
) J 0 tjt t
.. . _
: U ' TLIC N . TICE
E ,
. .
PUBLIC HEARING .
•
CITY- OF RENTON
•
PLANNING COMMISSION
•
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON
. SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AT 8: 00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
•DESCRIBED BELOW: •
•
S ►
PURPOSE : TO REVIEW THE .COMPREHENSIVE .PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA
IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI -405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE
EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT—OF—WAY ON THE SOUTH.
• 1
n / te — •
s T i r It's, _
•
2 lir :"'. 4 .-- , ---- .-..-- .----,.._.-__ . ..,,;04.,—.
� E.u. t.
_
._. , ,,. " ...,_:,. . . , ., .
•
..: •- 4,---• " --t,..-- AVE ' :_/ I " is\0"1.. '9 l'ft.\
triri. ,7-.-1,_) f?'‘' ::::[-r '''lia .i-- ri . F--71---'5, \- --->,t2±-7-- . .
NsN_ u 17 — I io -i- - n \.
.: _
T-
I
!I
l:__'1 L_ '-„ _-- $ - _ ...^__7ru—. ____I__.AVr. \ S[N.q-Er - __ -
7I —\
.I,14 it
__ nvC.�
`\ \
r-------- �� O -y x � to a .. x l n \
P- : - ,
•
�/ I .3 6 AV E \
.-,-=°' ' '----1 1.-.--'oi S.:‘' i '''.........i.C .....
` to 4I 1•,
‘ -7114-44 --INA \ \'' ' ''' .- \1\\'‘'
OoNN
i" - —, _—....... ....-...:-..________________________________ ......
-,____________ . _._—.1.---:
I 11. ` �. .\
a
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND .TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT
COMMENTS IN WRITING .
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT: .. '
CITY OF• RENTON — PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE, S.
RENTON, WA. 98055
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ss.
Nar 'a-r.et Harbaugh being first duly sworn on
oath,deposes sthat.,S. e.isthe Chief Clerk on file in the_F#enton Plan-
,P y of ---;�---
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) : NOTICE OF
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and PUBLIC HEARING
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred . RENTON LAND USE
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- HEARING EXAMINER
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, ,RENTON,WASHINGTON
"
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained A;PUBLIC HEARING '
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton WILL BE 7 HELD BY THE
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the ,RE NT O N .LAND, U S E
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, • • '•HEARING EXAMINER AT
_I HIS T.REGULAR:MEETING
Washington.That the annexed is a Notice of Public ( • -_,IN THE•.COUNCIL CRAM-
` ,
" BERS,;:"CITY=.HALL;..RE-
NTON;.WASHINGTON,ON
... ie.a.r•ing i ,::SEPTEMBER;20;:1977,AT
` 9:00`A.M.;-TO`CONSIDER,
7 : THE'''FOLLOWING•:•.PETI:
as it was published in regular issues(and „':• :,`O,TIONS:':...•: , : "'.;,
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period I _..r_.:___;..,.;;,;:;<.1..RUBIN SALANT,'RE,
I- �`;,-_ -„ ;; ```ZONE FROM•.GS-1'TO
R2=to:R-3.'File°Na R-; ;.
of a, consecutive issues,commencing on the j, :, „ ar' 071=77;property.located
•'-'': ;%?,..•;;on Grant Ave. S6.1 bet
. ::' ::,::liv,een South Puget Drive
9 day of September ,19.77.....,and ending the and;South"18thSt.
2..HILL-ROWE INVEST- .
,,.MENTI,CO:;':SITE:"AP-
' PROVAL'•'IN".A M-P -+
day of ,19 both dates i `:ZONE; File No.SA-075=
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- I _ •77; property located on• '
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee • east side of West Valley_
Road and:north-of.,S.W.
- , .. - ,43rd'St.''directly south of '
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $23�.7.9which ;: _ Northwest Hobby, and:
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the • ToyCo --:'
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent : Legal descriptions of'a
insertion. P-
1^ ^ �_ , - :plications noted above are:,
r., .--
Chief Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9 day of
....Se.pt.emhe.r•.., 19.....7.7 i /" r nril;'�`�!/C�\\
� kJ CSC f
:,i {1�i .��,`;I�� O2
Notary Public m,and for the State of Washin, , 3 _ 1
' residing at Kent, King"County. Qr. v
,d1--, Is-)
—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate-Bill 281,effective June ''' - --- VZ
9th, 1955. \`v .s /
—Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, \NG D�0. ."r
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
RENTON , WASHINGTON j;
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS
REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , ;'RENTON , WASHINGTON ,
ON SEPTEMBER 14 , 19 77 , AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO .CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING
PETITIONS :
A PETITION FROM THE RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY; OWNERS OF
RENTON HILL TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT .
PERTAINS TO THEIR AREA, PARTICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR
AVENUE SOUTH . THE RENTON HILL 'AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY
BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH ,
THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE
POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 14 , 1977
AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
SANDRA GIST , SECRETARY
PUBLISHED September 4 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
CERTIFICATION
I , Vincent A. Tom , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE. ABOVE
DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY
DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn
to before„ me , a NotaryPublic , SIGNED ,.;
� ' �—
on the \� day of 5e.0vNAe " ,
1911 .
•
\C\UCja- -\(\1\ \rt\.
iN U I,\ I:) \ 14 \6N , N,, ,..iv.-o _., (7,,,Q\AA7--), ),J,1+1 i
- s- _,---,,46/
--- c%)--1.1,,/--) ... i / ,.
ci-v/xPr:7,71 ,f q-Y-05 -- a `n-frf___.e. k.7 -Th. - -7. 3 ' • - ' P/
._. I '-'j (1- 74, 7 ./ ) ...--.. -. . . :,-.
/2- -----,->_:,,,- ,,,. .
' -;:et; L..'-'. ',-. /' ,4
c7-*
ii
//.<:- (7.7- 17, 7Y/ -7P-6:2 ..." / 4.1,77,7
. — 5_7wff .s-c7- 2/--__ /62/ -?---,- ,/-/2--)/, 4'4 wi,
c r .N ?•P111P /e'
-,cs ...07/ /,.. 9',..cE
-2-e--- ,7 ii _./7/___h
.,
- QS i" rnY,01-7-v7- / -: .= -'g/ ''''W. ' Z, - / 4
0 ?rop a d u) r_g ,-ir Ri- 1--( -i) ›JP-6ra- - . z_.L-1,f— b
., /77
e4 --_z
2x.2.47k 2,i ,_,A.. ..
.._..... L 2 S/
a 4W, ---1 -dp / t"V Ac 0 (774.7 r
/ z/- //,,
pr / . 72 t a711)71t/ C.. C../ //6
ert ead
17 i v 7(21/ /7/I
a, -
— /00
*1-f- ?2,-.-- "&" - P'eE - 11 -77/1/7j (_..L / ,3
e
'
C(----73nKe:i 11 0 z 2 . vvvw 1) in r ri? ), LO)jsb
.A9 _ -- '
.s s. d3s g 53210Q V 3 La hf N
)
k
Vt la r.6,
-- ------------------ - - ?
\Y in 1. tVoi ri / QA -7 7 I it N OilYg>i
�
�
�
�
--- __--_-__- -
'
. ` ^
,
� � !
/
/
'
�
----'
jor
--__-_'--_--_-'_--_-
--------------
---_-_�-__--
'
I
...:,.>\
.. Ru
_ f , d • ,
Century 21 Homeco, Inc.
,,,,,..e....-
•,--,,y,
v ..
:
i — -T —----- '' 280 Hardie S. W. 772-5000 4,
c
1 1 r—r--
,
E, &4, Here
7"—.01
a OU 0 TM
PEALloo
Each office is independently owned and operated.
‘• ,_,,, ,..,...... :.-.. ..,,,,,,,..“7 ice,7,:ws,,,„-,.,:,..1.1,-4.-twAve;•,-72.i..)--,,,#,,,,,,,,,,j+7.1,-,w440-.cb.a.,---t774- to.mt,
-- •Meet
,s; ,„,f:y-Tiir,vcrztl,2:..1.1z1,v,-,z,.,,....7-,,,,..z.v...,',•.;5,.-4...xtit :,40.:,-44 4?'•• ok....01
7..'-' ,... t'....2•!....:...„.....lita s,
,,. ,, , ...i.gtt.r1 A•;.'1.::..,•••-•.. tf.,;•:•.'-47.- .<, .,"'"•...*.;.,1•41!•'•.•".•'':•,;,,,W• '- t,,
t „..a., ,,,.. . ,..,. .
, erea .-est tr, te .. ; ,,,ssku,! , k.,,.r." i 1
t„,„„.,,, t•• •.....-....•-•• •- .•.-c."-41,' -4 4--"A Th.killk..„,-L.4 ...4.•.,-. ,
;,•.-.;;,..,of.,,.--•t,•.,f••,;„•••t;.,-. ••••-„... :;:t..* ,..t.eir%,,,:,CittAtqh_l•tvt,-.....f-kract' 11tir•V'..,,,e. ,,..,,,ti .,„,,,,„......„,„, ,
.•• '..-."':T` .X4,....'.'-.1tc,I74:-.4.e. •••;;"?."5.141.A.:.4,:,,;,,,,,•;i ,e4.4 -,..N..4.. ..1.,, s.tki,,...,4,0...via,.:,:
t
, ., 4.
I • ,...- t--44.-.4. 1.14,t- , f . 4,: f •%--. • ••k• 4 < „, • tq $‘ .. t• .,., -471.••'4.- --"•'. 44-
, e 0 ' . ' 4 -
-A-- --'- ivtn' ' ourner - ' -or - oo
,
_ , %.,*jr,. .V,E52e ..t, -ro,'' .11.Vra',47*
i -410';'.4-:...'v-r... Y;=;"?'.4
r••': '..44'1'..-r--4'zt-PI,•-• ''1-..1 ", IV' -.04'11•RW••-• 4.1. 412.,.; 1.1,A=9.A.,‘•Itw<?I-VA''', -.4t_,_INI.....x.+-Ake. I'41- <:•‘-*-ft..c.;;A:'''.1V,0-,1.4,...,,. 1•-•.t..,,...„..<<i?..T..t.n.,;,„-•..,:e:Eiv,/,.-..-.:..-..<tc,,,,,•:-4. .c,4ti..„; At2t1.07,4,.r.i.t".wi,-•,•?..+*.frtti.4•'-,.1,7,t;41-1,4,411,W147.• ••t-'41 . '1"i„C"...% 4.444.141434,C4'..-4,4$
k4It''''' -l'''''‘ItVi..1:1 '4q4- t'-
'g-tWe'liti:IlltheefatlifOiekl'
:A
!:',..' , . 1 ., .1 ... , . .;„..1..,,.. , ',,ik-, .- --,vim , •. tl, ,
t-,, ..1-‘ •r'.- i i,r,,,f“ ,...w.,,,,,A.,*,9,.....;40?„,-.4.0,1,149,..: .!OA_ '' l ••,- (
1 N.*, t. ...• . t
1 A .. 1.-ii lit..,.....
,
- ,
•.:i ..•- , tt. .
\. -t, , .-
90 NEW Homes Cedar Crest 4z-i.r..-.i.y.,.. .3.:•,-,!,.,..i. : t P 1
Condominiums . . ,
. , . .
,, ..,„. ....„., . i
vz...V. '.•'r'',.- ..,'- r
7 • . '''..,',P,::.'''''';1'4",,17. • , . ----'''' , . -'',.., '\I 1.;.7:...;',„,' "-,,,,4',0"4.1,P i
,oty,4'1.44'°43X-'14{,V4i4 ,
t.
f • i.'' 91,7,4..4y4.4„,,',,k-L-Red,,,:,,,,,,,,,s; .-----'
, , ;;,-14:•,,,NT,Ii*:4444:44,..*40,voz...,„--- , ... .,.., .„, . ,„. I
.-^ViiIVO,,.."), ''. 4.:''':.''.t'fv, .•4%.:'V.,.'i•.,.
• ck,,,...c.r.v..94,4,,,,,,AtviviatZiSafilmr vg.:3WPA-'2' • a- r:'.:,* '1. ,` riir.':•:::,:',‘': ::s-.7',V4f..14„,.'.,"
4g. ...,,,..+4.,•,^...,•.1 W. ....,,r,,?:tr.,.. • . . .» t.'i t,,. ‘ ,.", . ft ,,trszbA,V,
.,.‘''
i ri: tlfe!..".:Pt:410:", P.iltgfit*A0 .•' ''', ri' ".40, ..^ ' I 2;....4,. ., I„...V4i".)'•
tt t;',. .cY''''''';:410 '007414.14r '',• ..:4, 1,tit'. IS, . -, -.,t- 4.., ..._
A , ,,....A 4..'v'fwbc ... g....,1. ' ''''.-r-;•C Vs.:-=:•A''''..4
; Ei 1, •ttl 1."-..* ??? ' .- ;, • '''' ,-,V.,' ee4:4.1.V0•„
, 7.......a.,,-.,,,,,,•RI.,,, ,
4- --,...4e?-,4447,r - • 4 N „
Deluxe 2 bedroom, 2 bath floor to ceiling wood
4,",,,..i<,••'-‘tt'-'WV,c,'01'1:W.:!,..L' 1.''I''
t V't. '.4•,tit.14:-,-*1-VOit* . ''.,<, . burning fireplace. Thermo-pane windows. Complete
1- ' 1 r t.,,,,,
• ff:-; ; security system, cable TV, built-in vacuum, low
-,.(1:,.,10:74.,N,V14,t.V,-46,- •-,- • • ,-4?,."'••
'V,Str".t..',,,..XO:a.•13 41:t0',1V 41-4•• '-;.‘t •i;,a7 .'"'I-; ''i maintenance construction (life time), professionally
, '70•-o7- 12.-.4.tAAI:1174gili,tk ,, ,,,. •. h',.e 4.,
•:,.. ,•h1,-;,,,,N.4.6,,,e.fitv-Vt;,.. ,',4,z4;.,,„,.,,, ,, ,,:4.„:."j_ landscaped, sweeping 180° view — Kent to Space
Needle. Drive to 629 Cedar St., Renton. 3 blocks from
.. Renton City Hall.
it
Renton Planning Commission
Public Hearing Meeting
August 10 , 1977
Page Nine
On the question , a roll call vote was requested with the following results :
BUCKINGHAM - NO
GAIN - YES
GARRISON - YES
GIST - NO
MOLA - NO
NELSON - NO
TEEGARDEN - NO
MOTION FAILED.
Following discussion , IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY NELSON, THAT THE AREA SOUTH OF CARR ROAD AND
WEST OF THE GREENBELT AS DESIGNATED ON THE MAP BE RETURNED TO THE COMMIT-
TEE FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION AND THAT THE COMMITTEE RETURN ITS RECOMMENDA-
TIONS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE ALONG WITH THE ORDINANCE
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR A CHANGE IN THE P-1 DESIGNATION.
Discussion ensued relating to the amount of area involved , the need for
a new definition of the public use category before sending the recommenda-
tion to Council , the Ordinance Development Committee ' s progress on the
Zoning Ordinance revision , the obligation to Dr. ' Divelbiss and Messrs .
Erwin and Scott , the need for reconsideration by the Commission of the
entire plan instead of just the Comprehensive Planning Committee in
view of earlier votes , the lack of a revised public use category defi -
nition , and the extent of the current development in the area . Com-
missioner Teegarden noted that the P- 1 zone at present is defined, but it
does not allow apartments , which is the message that is being received
from public hearings , and that the area originally under study included
the area south of Carr Road.
On the question , MOTION FAILED.
On the original motion, THAT THE COMMISSION CONCUR IN THE REPORT AND REFER
THE RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO THE COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC HEARING, MOTION CARRIED.
6 . ADMINISTRATIVE:
A. COUNCIL REFERRAL:
PETITION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN , CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
The Chairman requested a briefing from the Planning Director.
Mr. Ericksen noted that the request is a referral from the City Council
in response to a petition where the petitioners are concerned regard-
ing the Comprehensive Plan and zoning , as it related to Cedar Avenue
South ( Renton Hill ) .
The Chairman invited input from the Comprehensive Planning Committee .
Commissioner Teegarden , Chairman , advised that the committee recom-
mends that a public hearing on the subject be held and suggests that
it be scheduled for September 14, 1977.
Following brief discussion , IT WAS
ACTION:
MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
SET SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AS THE PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR THE MATTER OF
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. MOTION CARRIED.
• MEMORANDUM
TO m Gordon Ericksen DATE 6/27/77
FROM Willis Roberts
SUBJECT Petition - TO REZONE CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
Kathy Keolker , 255-0936 , called to inquire regarding the
status of their petition . (She originated it . ) She was
advised that the matter was currently under study by the
Planning Commission ' s Comprehensive Planning Committee
and that the earliest time they could make their recom-
mendation would be at their August 10th committee-of-the-
whole meeting , and the Council recommendation would follow.
She and several of her neighbors would like to participate
in the Planning Commission ' s study. - said they have some
solutions and alternative ideas .. They have a legal repre-
sentative , Gary Faull , who is also willing to become per-
sonally involved , as he lives in the neighborhood . She
would appreciate a call from either you or Clark Teegarden .
They are also concerned about new apartment construction .
Is there any way to stop it while they are waiting for
a Council decision?
•
•
p1' R�
-� 1j,
"� THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING I)EPA RTMM ENT
235-2550
��TfO SEPSE�O��
•
MEMORANDUM
June 20 , 1977
TO : Clark Teegarden , Chairman
Comprehensive Planning Committee
•
FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director
RE : PETIT-ION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE {
LAND USE PLAN , CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH •
Pursuant ' to previous discussions , we are forwarding
the petition for consideration of the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan on the Renton Hill area .
GYE:wr •
Attachments
cc : Joan Walker; Chairman
Planning Commission
•
•
pk:
f;
A. INTEROFFICE ME-MO
Date June 8, 1977 -
TO: Planning Dept.
FROM: Del Mead
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Petition to Rezone Cedar Avenue South
Referred by the City Council at its regular meeting
of June 6, to the Planning Commission and Land Use
Hearing Examiner for review and recommendation re-
garding Comprehensive. Land Use Plan and. zoning for
this area.
DM:bh
Attach
•
74-''1‘ iffiVED ?%& - .
JUN 9 1977
<z
\<9y �+
�L jNG�E
u.- .
' PETITION • . A+ -
We , the undersigned residents and property- owners of Renton
Hill, hereby petition the City of Renton to rezone Cedar ,.%
O 1 '1�'
Avenue South in its entirety for single family dwellings, ;'� 1c ,19; \ •
excepting those multi-family units currently in existenc .�) ',LULAVQUI.1 LD O\
7Z
We petition for this change based on the following: JUN 9 1977
1 . The traffic pattern, accessibility, street widt .o
and parking are not adequate to provide for the extra `..7 ��
• congestion caused by the addition of multi-family dwelling ��IVG DEpR��
We have enough difficulty now without adding to the problem. '
2 . Our property is considered "view property" and
we do not wish to forfeit our views by allowing apartments
to locate in our neighborhood. All of us take pride in
our homes and many have gone to considerable expense (both
in time and money) to improve and modernize our older homes. .
Our neighborhood is a quiet place to live and we intend to R CE/v 0
keep it that way.
JUN• 6 3,977
Respectfully submitted, �taq', pc “�. ,�a:�,
- O' O>'F4'r
• The residents of Renton Hill
''-) ,C k 1 on Cedar Avenue South
DATE NAME ADDRESS
. •,i,:j.)-) ;
- -1.7 - <-
. \
) 7-Z'J''''')--'' /4".5'")"‘ 7..------:a -- , i-,,fip Iv:-',.--, -.',,
,/7
.-t(."
., .;_.<,
.1 4,/.. ,'1 ,.."k 7
i/f•j' f/ i 1ir) 71 L
' "."-, ) '' / 1`�:',N,/'`/j�ln--L!----) '-.':1 L- "`-?•/? / 5 /--:?;:.-)..,-.' - tom/
k. / r. - . • . ;lL 'r ,�,,,, I)f\ . 1—,—, ;1c-,N ,_� L, ,5 1c� c+' !' U .a , ( L,1/
.I
4 / .), _7 0 . i 17- '/i,i,t,3 i v1 (rC E 0 �; 1 f `> -3 I L. C c` (i`r 1C. i,` ri , L:_(: - \[Z:
J ,t
. t' o i r1 . �, —
. . .
. .
. • - . •
. . •, " . . . .
. . . . .
. .
. .
. .
: •
PETITION PAGE 2
DATE NAME ADDRESS
, ..•
. .
. • , .
-",' ,:-/•-,. - / "--....__ ,r_.•11L:: ZILLILL___:-...Z.__ ,
, .
. . .. .
- I t .!
'' . ' f -7.7..1 i: .i.1 i.‘").-1,---x -.)(..--k t (--'1 1 (.--/.---•,' :, r! .. - t . •;t: 1•14- 1...,1•:-... _-'• s.—
.. _
...-, , •
'••-::-1"--/----,—,—...4,-- --,1,4.-c-,;(4/--' ' / z_-_,•••---1 , ,./-:., fi... 4/„•,, (•;, .., \
,_....„
,• ,•., --...!:.„ / , _.- c-,
, . ..._, ..
6-- 3 7•,.• ,.., ./-' ,•:.• .... , _-•.; ,_-_-_-). •
.._. ./.... r•, ..._.••••-- ,; ix 77 ,
•• ••. .,- •. ,....7--et1/4,1 1,_..?"--, 44,..•..-
3-.... ' ( c.,_/;•• -...'..c ,,-
ez_e•-4-4_, /-i.I.-c.-- .(--
,,
;,.,---- .-• ,--) . / ,; , ....'•"-'s i ,---,--
. ...• .-..•...e,./_(„'„,(, / „„e„,-.4 ( ,- , . ,-' .•i , (c.'le/ ,.--,."--)...e"Ce ez.4„.1 "...i.-.‘,:.--e-•• --1-':'--; •
,'.. ..
-„... /
. . ,.-,..;), ;;• .--;,, ;,--- ......,..._:// . , •2
-;;•-9:...._ .,. ,,.._,,_,,. .../ ...._...
--- --1 . .. ,• .
. ; /• • • • .,,, .- ,. ,, . .
,,‘. : .,.•,-/. ; ,. ,•.,; ,. „ ...' .•44,-.?---. --,- - ." ..;,:-;- , ,.. ;-I"- .,./7/
. ... - ..• r // / / (
i--.........,.. •
1- -. '7 •7 /',•,, .)/ -
.__.
- (...-
• •' -• • , • ••''q 1.' . . . .
.. -- 9., --- _;-e .4. . ,
• 7- ) ,,i ,,,/ , / • ....
• .. -, , f. ., ,../ / „. , /
'-..•_:)"(--e--- --•-4&-(---- /..- •'''..-J :7- .,.' // -..,, ;• J i ,'' )-k-(-
9
,i1 •
, , , .' (..• -•..(_.(_1:-.(1,...2 !" C ./ _i-1_C. f')"._Li -' '-.- .) L _C!"-:•.•,:',t. ) • , _ ..,:•-f• . . ),
-.- '. '-' .-s. • ss '-' . ,->".. -/ i ,f2 Ii , A t i 1 :-.. -..:,'- /,
''i... ,_•-(-1 ,, „.. /( /i./.• (
. ,..___ --•-_-• r() .
. , ,••.% \ 's.'".1_,.. *-.7------..:7.-..•,,, ••- • c.,-_,
,/,
./..'.11 / ' '''...•% '1''' "3-{"X",2 / , '2 " •2 ,--• ,......:i
..'../ (---,2..2.-I', "..• , , -?'. ,.. ,.....-= - i )
''' ,•• . i' 1'7 r .---' 1"\, i
.., I
i _ •-, ' ,.. 1- I, : ' 1 , II . --- 0 rs,\
. ts• ,r) ,...,, . , ..I r 1
•-•• \ \ .-;.•',, ..:' • --,, .' S,J,•1_,,,Pj•-•-(,,, /1,-- ,-.., •-• ,._, ‘• ...A,..i., i"-•'%- -4_,' ,r''. a,
.. . :... - • -`,---, ..1 • ,e; ..,'- ,- e2-,.."--t?
• ./.....Z.:.....i e.,..,•-• 1.e ..,•; ..":".).L. L•....2.-..•,.......4. c_. - - . . ,.0--0e" •
ii
*if ' ; • /'/ 4 '4-4, /
11. (t_2".. Ai) 4_, (c) -..//f.', ,i. .
1 r- . ',7-:/4-CA-e") a
. A- ..., -', •.1 ..'"<. -, _A,, - /
.___. .
• , • /•.‘ , , --- --z„. - c•-•
• . •• 1 ' A 0‘exL--.4,•.L...- Li
'--- "-" ; •.:''•. ••.' ': 'Th c' a\--
I i It ,2- c7' - -.!------ •• • '
7 4 , .„:•.,
../ , ( •,...J N. ,
. --P • i ti,
•' . A . e... ) .• 7.-zz.-74.--7 „ ..,,, .. -7, -1 „.. „,:c,.., e?,•7 ,..,.,!„.(
/ .•
.._...., . . .., / • .-
. ( 1/
..--/ ,.! • /17 •) "..'•,I ( ,7,,•---'1 •• - •} 1../.... 7(._ c).---• .-
. -)c---'• / e./...‘
. . ,.-,.,r----1 .-fr•-•
/ ' / / I I, I , ::,-( :/;:„.' 2 C.:-. Lj••••-•-- k ( i
, .. ..." • ./ ••-. . ..4.-./ ( i:'ki.,1 iz.-./. '.:- •::•-J./ L-..- ...---'( ; /
_..,
'......r........ ....,-....
- 1 • - ,.:...•..,-.A.. .,..-../....
) .... • e
----',.(.:.,' ‘' , , :c-i c_k_ .., ( i••- -' ,% , 7 . /-) /
-,- -"--
• 1
• ...., ,•,
/ . --... ‘: ,i, , '-'•, , .., /,•:•-•._I,- , ) . , .• ,
. /z (...r.;-: _ . • /,,_,_. ,„i ./,..,..,_,. ,
;'../ ..,
• ...„,__ i
/ .I ....,4-, :•. .,/„.
" , , 1_,
)--
• , • • . •
.. . .. _
., . . . .
.,. •, . • .
. . .
. ,
, .
- /
PETITION PAGE
, ...
DATE NAME ADDRESS
—7-------7J-•r--, —
•-,-:-.., 7. / ,, - ., F ,,, ; ..
5/....-:-....5—(.. et..re..--5,
._;,....‘,..,z,-i?.,..-. . :-.....:-/ /- ,.. ..../._.- .,
,.......,„•!..,,..,/ ..„ 1.3
...._,.. ‘_•:, .,
- i .' C..-•-t.---<f,t‹.e-e.-../C__ '4>:''...,:" ,' ',../-(- -( .7/-='; .--1' ,.:- ,-4.-e_. ..-C.:.-e•-(-7 ..,--),
• .5.,/./.2 /2 '?:;; izt/zz--(-2-e-' ,:2,% A',
7 ,/,,,;,./,.,. ..-1.--
/ -
X.- -^
L‘7'/ "/7/-7
-e;:•-•-/ Alt (-"/-• •-;"9-2- 1/‘-C t ///a,/ ) ..----- 2-,'Ilfr) ---------
•-- :---77,
' 1 • •,-) (..(------
...• .... ,, •,-,‘ '% „.. .
•" f 17-7 -.I.,L a -,-,L. z..-:- -'7/..-v_.. c:---.5 s)..... "./.. (:..i- el.... le i • (...."2, t":••,!_... ..f.r' .
,
T _ ,
7,...,, y .•• , , .
,...: , ... • ..., , ________
,.,
.../---. , ,.: 7-. .-,,,,_./
:,./ -.-• . ,.,.,-, .....„-,,,,. /.... •......,-1-,..--7 <.--'';•••:-:
.,...,)- t...;
/
. 5
' 7
k.7.../. _ / ..a ...e/.2
..f: • ..-..`,/. .. ..--) /, /,
-e7'..
, 1 ..- . ..: .1 ,---..;_ 1,-7- ,1-- . 7 r • '..-/ ,-..•,....‹.......-(24:1-,..,...k....›
., • ,.% --- ,/
y
_
L-c' 2%-' 1 --. ..7/ .r---' ./:.,•
'--- .• ' ' 6" / ". L-4 ' 4-'..,--) 1/1') 1•,-..,%',/ -
••-,,), „. .
• , ..-i (..,
,,--,-.,' - . ... , ,,••-)
. ..,/-4 1 : • .• ' /L,f•-, . i71.0- ",71,..51:: c. /, I ,/-: f ?-t-•/- .'r ..2.__ - •/. ,• 7- : _ -•6 7 '0‘7''', •
.2 ) ---) •'/
•.„,/,,:;/--..'.: i \•-i,•_2 I X,e • -;,','"? 2, (.2"-CZ'Y •••••-;,..".•_,:.-R-1-(:),f,„-y - _.• .,_.
/ , ."- ..-i.75.• ,7 ,,..
•-., ,,' •••:: --)"--,
s,.-.. .., (--)/.. (--.-- c.., •
/I:, "VV.) ,/ .,!...i ....C.,. ,.,
. r
'/ f/ ' • /' /• ./
I);:1•L' .'.,2..'.. / //,..'''(..'i /.•:,_ •• ,L.'6,4 24.1.6e iti‘. ,`r?/;14._ ,:•,5 ,:.J/ c_.-e,/a . e-%14-e' ‘,.,__-.•;ei?,-,,7•:e'
/ ' -- • _
7-4:.• ,-.7 7/ , _, .
, /...-, .--.,
'_.- 7 i ..;c :i.ael..- --
- .-,. - _— . / •• '/-• _• (, ._ --/ r<_-- //,.....
„ .„..„.
- ....
,... - .).- .,., ..•
/ c
f -/ --; i -) '. . - . .21,/ i .',, .- /7 • --, , ,
• . 1-, , ? ,..•_.,- ,, /0"
.-..-- • i .)-4 ' - -----. .'', - ., ) .\ C.• ."- -- "'-' ' ' '1 t.:-...:'-----, '‘• .-,.-'''''' -
-1,::..)-"?i/I
,''.;,/..)7:::-/21/117/k.77,"/%4 f...--E.,.7itrz te: •--./.,......7,4/da„,,e,.4... .,-7, i'.'''/..±,--:/..,/,'t.: /v.,...) „co
- , ..
:i••
..---
1,••• . I.. •••• .-- . (--- ..---- ,17//17/ /4'7"./,/fif //P( 5--(
A
- ,
r..
"--•\....,.t.e,',---.' "...- i j/.,f,:‘w ie.dd :.,z"A / : -:"-7',. .4 '', "''' '
-.
'
a 7 . .. /) 1 .) I i r_/1,4.:-)#"/•,.:•r:-.-.);,7 _L_4/J':)'IL' ,:)i('•"•/,.::.. 7 . /../,../...-/..,.' I,"•\ •-• 7',: _1/I
/ ,„. '
_ 7- ) 7- ' - ` .
..,2
-
I 0 C - ( -,
,---.-:-. ---; \
•/ 1- I ) .._,--V i :a:
• • i , -----
. ' ' \Lil 14. r
,
,
•
•
. •
_ . _ ....._
— ___.
.' .
a .
. . .
n .
a .
. ..1. .
. . .
- . . .
r. . • .
•
:s
. s •
. t . •
. . • -
. _
. .
. • .
. . - . • .
. .
. •
• .
. . . .
. .
• _ .
. . .
. • • . . . .
. . .
••• . 1
..-_. - .
...,,,,,..fl.....-' I,....-- ..." 1 c....,.,..1-- ,..... ... ...-,
— i .
.7,
s .
• •
. .
. .. ,
. ,
. .
. .
. •
. . ..
. „ .
. . .
. .
. i.
. .
. . .
.., .
. . .
. .
. .
. . , .
. •. I
•• .
. t
• ,
. ,
. • i
. • .
•
•
• •
. II
. •
. '
I
1' r
. I
• .
, •
1
. 1
-- -
I 1
. 1.
. I
- r
fi
. 1
. .
W M7/
Renton City Council (2Cctc:r //''`'• S'
6/6/77 Page 3 •
Consent Agenda - Continued
Energy Director. Other members: Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner,
Conservation and Clark Petersen, Library Director. Committee will coordinate
Committee the City' s energy conservation measures. Information.
appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs. Joan A. Walker, 1433
'fanning Monterey Ave. NE, to three-year term on the Planning Commission
:omission effective 7/1/77 through 6/30/80, having served on the Commission
since 1975 and presently Vice Chairman. Refer to the W__a_ys and Means
Committee.
appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointted Peter Banks additional
Judge Pro tem Municipal Court Judge Pro tem. The letter explained Mr. Banks is
with law firm of Hardwick and Conrad, Evergreen Building; appointment
effective through 12/31/77. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
:onsent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AS
\pproval PRESENTED. CARRIED.
:ORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
.enior Citizen Letter from Leland Pumel , Chairman, Senior Citizens Planning Committee
:enter informed Council of motion passed unanimously at their 5/16/77 meeting
recommending that the Mayor and City Council pass a $600,000 limited
general obligation bond to complete the senior center. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMUNITY
SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
listrict Court Letter from Mayor Delaurenti requested Committee of the Whole agenda
ease of 6/9/77 include presentation by Del Bennett on lease negotiations
with the County for District Court space; lease agreement must be
executed by 6/30/77. Presentation to include proposed allocation
of space for Municipal Court. Moved by Perry, Second Clymer, Council
refer communication to the Public Services Committee for review and
recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN REQUEST OF MAYOR'S OFFICE AND REFER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE
WHOLE. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: THORPE, SHINPOCH, BRUCE; 3-NO: PERRY,
STREDICKE, CLYMER. MAYOR DELAURENTI VOTED AYE AND BROKE TIE VOTE,
MOTION CARRIED
atecomer' s Letter from William L. McLaughlin, Jr. , 10630 SE 176th, Renton,
greement requested a latecomer' s agreement for a water line he is installing
ater line in the Kennydale area, noting the plan filed with Water Department, No.
W-463. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST
TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
enton Hill A petition bearing 63 signatures of residents of Renton Hill , mainly
edar Ave S. Cedar Ave. S. requested rezone of Cedar Ave. S. in its entirety for
equests single family dwellings, except those multi-family units currently
ingle Family in existence, based on reasons : (1 ) Traffic pattern accessibility,
oning street width and parking not adequate; (2) Do not wish to forfeit
views by allowing apartments to locate in neighborhood; all residents
taking pride in homes and having gone to considerable expense in both
time and money to improve older homes. The letter noted the neighbor-
hood is a quiet place to live and intent to keep it that way. Moved
by Perry, Second Stredicke, Council refer communication to the Planning
Commission for review and recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY
SHINPOCH, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING
ON RENTON HILL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HEARING EXAMINER, 'CARRIED.
dvance Refunding Letter from Mayor Delaurenti attached letter from City's investment
ater & Sewer consultants, Seattle-Northwest Securities Corp. signed by Richard T.
onds Kennedy, Vice President, concerning recommendations for advance refund-
ing of $2,950,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds , 1976. The
Mayor's letter concurred with Mr. Kennedy's recommendations and noted
Kennedy would meet with the Ways and Means Committee 6/6/77 at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Kennedy' s letter attached schedule of existing debt service and
Proposed refundinn iSSilp and savings. noting meeting with Public Works
Gonnason and Deputy Finance Director Bennett and the Finance Director,
Gwen Marshall . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN RECOMMENDATION AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Mr. Kennedy, City's investment consultant, was introduced.
•
TRANSAMERICA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
RESPONSE TO PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN CHANGE
1
•
•
•
•
•
• SHIDLER, MCBROOM, GATES & BALDWIN
• LAW OFFICES
ROGER L.SHIDLER - (206) 223-4666
GEORGE W. McBROOM 1000 NORTON BUILDING
WILLIAM H.GATES SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104
WILLIAM F. BALDWIN
JAMES R. IRWIN
JAMES C. MIDDLEBROOKS November 21, 1977
RICHARD B. DODD
FREDERICK ROSS BOUNDY
JAMES L. FLETCHER
CRAIG V. WENTZ
DAVID T. McDONALD
PATRICIA J. PARKS
DALE K. ROUND?
GARY D. HUFF -
WILLIAM A.BUTLER
Members
Renton City Council
Municipal Building •
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Members of the City Council of the City of Renton:
By a vote of four to two, the Planning Commission
passed a resolution recommending to the City Council to
change the comprehensive plan by designating the area of
Renton Hills located north of the Puget Sound Power and
Light Company transmission right-of-way as, a single-family
residential area (R-1 zoning) . This change in the com-
prehensive plan would affect Mill Street and a portion of
Cedar Street which are presently designated as areas for
medium density multi-family use (R-3 zoning) .
Transamerica Development Company ("Transamerica")
owns 10 . 05 acres at the south end of Cedar Street which is
now designated R-3 and which would be adversely affected by
the change in designation from R-3 to R-1 use. This acreage,
which is undeveloped land, was purchased as R-3 land from
Puget Western, Inc. twelve years ago. A premium price was
paid for the R-3 designation and Transamerica has paid taxes
on the land for the past twelve years on the basis of an
R-3 designation. Earlier this year Transamerica entered
into negotiations to sell 6 . 67 of its ten acres located at
the south end of Cedar Street. At approximately the same
time a petition was circulated in the Renton Hills area
requesting a change in zoning on Cedar Avenue south to
single family zoning exclusively.
The proposed sale of the 6 . 67 acre site is to a
local real estate developer who plans to construct a 90 unit,
four-plex clustered condominium on the property. The slope .
of the property is so steep that the roofs of the condo-
minium residences will be below street level and therefore
will not impair views and will be relatively inconspicuous .
i\L \
Members
Renton City Council
Page 2
November 21, 1977
Several acres of the parcel are so steep and rugged that
they will not be able to be built on at all. Because of
this terrain, and because the property abuts Interstate
405, the property is ideally suited for multi-family residential
use.
Since this property is not suited for single-
family use, its value as single-family property would be
minimal. Attached are MAI appraisals which show that the
value of the 6. 67 acre parcel, the sale of which is being
negotiated, is $120, 000 as R-3 multi-family residence
property and is only $15,000 as R-1 single-family residence
property. As shown in the attached appraisal , the value of
the remaining 3. 28 acres owned by Transamerica, which is
affected by the proposed change , is $60 ,000 as R-3 multi-
family residence property and is only $7 ,500 as R-.1 single-
family residence property.
The major opposition to the use of Transamerica' s
property as R-3 designated property appears to be that the
development of that property will cause congestion on Cedar
Street South. Attached is a traffic study by Joseph J. Millegan
& Associates, Inc. , traffic engineers, which shows that Cedar
Avenue South is used to approximately 50% of its optimum design
capacity, which unused capacity would be utilized by the
condominium residents. However, as detailed in the traffic
study, traffic circulation could be improved on the street
by a variety of ways, such as restricted parking on the
street, by making Cedar Avenue South a one-way southbound
street and making Renton Avenue South one-way northbound
between South 7th Street and South 3rd Street, and/or by
removing one of the six and one-half feet wide sidewalks
abutting each side of Cedar Street.
A legal memorandum was submitted to you by Robert
E. McBeth, attorney for the Renton Hill Community Association,
in which he sets out the manner in which a municipality should
approach zoning, as detailed in the court opinion of Carlson
v. Bellevue, 73 Wn. 2d 41, 51, 435 P. 2d 957 (1968) . We
agree that the quotation from Carlson v. Bellevue , set out
below, accurately states the law as to whether a zoning
ordinance is reasonable or not:
Members
Renton City Council
Page 3
November 21, 1977
"In determining whether or not a zoning
ordinance is reasonable in its application to
a given parcel of land, among the factors to
be taken into consideration are the character
of the neighborhood, existing uses and zoning
of nearby property, the amount by which property values
are decreased, the extent to which the diminution
of values promotes the public health, safety,
morals or welfare, the relative gain to the public
as compared with the hardship imposed upon the
individual owner, the suitability of the subject
property for the purpose for which it is zoned,
and the length of time the property has remained
unimproved, considered in the context of the
land development in the area. No single factor
is controlling but each must receive due con-
sideration. But to sustain an attack upon the
validity of a zoning ordinance, an aggrieved
property owner must show that if the ordinance
is enforced the consequent restrictions on his
property preclude its use for any purpose to
which it is reasonably adapted. He is required
to show that there is no possibility for pro-
fitable use under the restrictions of the
ordinance, or alternatively that the greater
part of the value of the property is destroyed
by it, although there may be some slight use
remaining. Adaptability, it has been declared,
envisages economic as well as functional use ,
and assumes not the most profitable use, but
that some permitted use can be profitable. "
(emphasis added)
The enclosed appraisals show that a change in the use of
Transamerica ' s property from R-3 to R-1 will destroy the
greater part of the value of the property, although there
may be some slight use remaining.
Ver truly yours ,
PJP:df Patricia J. Parks
RANEY APRHISAL SERVICE
SUITE 206
16625 REDMOND WAY
REDMOND, WA 98052
(206) 883-8814
Ms Patricia Parks October 28, 1977
Transamerica Development
Corporation
1000 Norton Building
Seattle, Washington 98104
Dear Ms Parks:
This letter of opinion of value is submitted in response to your request
for a study of the differences in value of the subject under alternative
zoning conditions: multi family (R-3 or R-4) as compared with single
family residential.
The 6.77 acre tract is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection
of South Seventh Street and Cedar Street South in Renton. Legal description
is: a portion of the Nr74 NA of Sec. 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
Willamette Meridian. It consists of tax lots 85 and 194.
This property overlooks the Renton Valley and lies on a very steep west
slope. Interstate 405, a major north-south freeway bypassing central Seattle,
adjoins the Western boundary. Cedar Street, which abuts a portion of the east
boundary, is blacktopped. That street bisects Third, a major downtown route
undercrossing 1-405, making convenient access to the downtown. Normal 'utili-
ties are available. The steep slope would require heavy development costs.
The property was recently sold to Gene 0. Farrell for $120,000, or a unit
value of $17,725 per acre or 41Q per square foot. This sale between Trans-
america Development Corporation and Mr. Farrell is typical of multi family
residential sales in the area, and was a negotiated transaction. Although
typical, this is in the lower ranges of value for multi family properties,
due to the steep slopes and resultant high development costs. Mr. Farrell
anticipated a multi family development when he purchased. A multi family
development is on the property adjacent to the north. "In my opinion, this
transaction represents fair market value for this tract, as of the date of
sale.
Single family residential land values in the Renton area were analyzed and
studied, in order to estimate value of the properti if it were zoned for
single family residential uses. (See attachment)
Patricia Parks
October 28, 1977
Page 2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SALES
Size Unit
Date Price Acre Value Zone Slope Sec. Twn. Range
* 7-26-77 $22,500 6.3 $3,571 G D 1 23 5
7-13-77 20,000 5.0 4,000 GS-1 C 9 23 5
8-08-77 55,000 11.7 4,701 S-R C 14 23 5
7-20-77 7,000 3.0 2,333 S-R C 28 23 5
6-08-77 6,000 1.1 5,455 S-R 4 23 5
6-13-77 11,000 1.7 6,529 S-R 22 23 5
6-14-77 14,000 2.6 5,385 S-R 23 23 5
4-22-77 8,000 2.8 2,857 S-R C 13 23 5
* 5-18-77 32,000 9.6 3,333 R-S 15,000 C 13 23 5
5-17-77 25,000 3.8 6,579 R-S 7,200 28 23 5
3-14-77 17,500 2.7 6,481 S-R 32 23 5
2-16-77 12,000 2.8 4,286 S-R 12 23 5
3-11-77 17,200 3.0 5,733 S-R 16 23 5
*12-03-76 75,128 31.6 2,377 S-R C SK 29 23 5
11-30-76 12,400 2.9 4,276 S-R 9,600 24 23 5
1-12-77 5,000 1.9 2,632 S-R 15 23 5
11-30-76 41,613 11.5 3,619 S-R 2 23 5
11-24-76 12,500 3.3 3,788 G 1 23 5
11-16-76 15,100 3.9 3,872 G 1 23 5
*11-22-76 24,000 8.1 2,963 S-R F 23 ' 23 5
12-15-76 32,000 9.1 3,516 R-S 15,000 C 13 23 5
12-15-76 30,000 9.1 3,297 R-S 15,000 C 13 23 5
1-21-77 36,800 7.9 4,658 S-R 15 23 5
2-07-77 30,000 5.5 5,455 S-R 27 23 5
12-01-76 34,000 7.2 4,722 S-R 34 23 5
12-06-76 490,000 50.3 9,742 S-R 34 23 5
7-27-76 60,000 9.1 6,593 20 23 5
9-18-76 1,200,000 154.0 7,792 S-R 35 23 5
4-16-76 165,000 23.6 7,013 w/ft 5
4-29-76 180,000 38.8 4,639 4 24 5
4-23-76 60,000 8.1 7,407 R-S 7,200 28 24 5
12-17-75 19,000 7.8 2,435 G 1 23 5
*These are used as comparable sales.
Patricia Parks
October 28, 1977
Page 3
Under a single family residential plan, the land has strong limitations due
to topography and heavy developments costs. Among the trouble areas are:
Utilities and access costs would be excessive. Rock bulk work would provide
level areas; hence increase the costs of foundation work. Since much of the
land is not suitable for single family dwellings, the number of units feas-
ible is restricted; noise and fumes from I-405 are counter to a single
family dwelling concept while acceptable for multi family uses. Plantings
along the freeway right of way restricts any potential view from the pro-
posed single family homes.
Single family residential land sales adjoining the 405 freeway were researched.
None were found in Bellevue or from the Bellevue south to Renton area. The
following four sales were studied to aid in the value estimate:
Sale Date of Price Total
No. Buyer/Seller Sale Size Per Acre Sale Price
1 Berger/Murphy 7-26-77 6.3 $3,571 $ 22,500
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E433' NW4 NE14 SE-1/4 (TXL 36) Sec 1 T 23 R 5
9 Armstrong/Stimson 5-18-77 9.6 3,333 32,000
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SA NW4 SE1 (POR TXL 14) Sec 13 T 23 R 5.
14 Divelbiss/Bardarson 12-31-76 31.0 2,377 75,128
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: POR Sw4 SW4 (TXL 43,45,62)TGW POR SE4 SE4 30=23-5(TXL 14)
Sec 29 T 23 R 5
20 Flora/Hill 11-22-76 8.1 2,963 24,000
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: POR GL7 (TXL 16) 95' RIVER WFT 'Sec 23 T 23 R 5.
Sales 1 and 9 are in an area less densely populated than the subject area;
concequently, they are priced lower. However, the sales do represent the
values of residential lands in the area. Overall, they are much more
desirable than the subject and tend to set upper limits of value.
Sale 20 is located three miles east of Highway 405, just north of the Maple
Valley Highway. This is a superior tract since it has 95 feet of frontage
on the Cedar River and the topography is gentler. Highway noise from Maple
Valley Highway to Sale would be less than the noise from I-405 to subject.
' Sale 14 is most similar to subject, representing the lower value range for
subject. Located within one half mile of the valley freeway, it is zoned for
single family use and is of steep topography. This sale also has a greater
amount of useful land, and is more remote from the highway. Overall, this
sale is superior to subject.
•
Patricia Parks
October 28, 1977
Page 4
In my opinion, subject is in the lower range of values for single family
residentail land. It would be valued in the range of $2,000 to $2,250
per acre - most likely $2,250 - with the total price rounded to $15,000
for the 6.77 acres.
The two values are:
Multi family zoning
6.77 acres @ $17,725± per acre $120,000
Single family zoning
6.77 acres @ $ 2,250± per acre $ . 15,000
Difference due to use (zoning) $105,000
Respectfully submitted,
RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE
Frank R. Raney, MAI, ARA FRR:ec
RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE
SUITE 206
16625 REDMOND WAY
REDMOND, WA 98052
(206) 883-8814
November 1, 1977
•
Ms Patricia Parks
Transamerica Development
Corporation
1000 Norton Building
Seattle, Washington 98104
Dear Ms Parks:
This letter of opinion of value is submitted in response to your
request for a study of the differences in value of the subject under
alternative zoning conditions: multi family (R-3 or R-4) as compared
with single family residential.
The 3.28 acre tract is located between Cedar Avenue South and Renton
Avenue South, and between South Ninth and South Tenth Streets. Legal
description is: a portion of the NWT NW'4 of Sec. 20, Township 23 North,
Range 5 East, Willamette. Meridian. It consists of Tax lot 196.
This property overlooks the Renton Valley and lies on a steep west
slope, which is cut up by a drainageway. Cedar Avenue, which abuts the
Northeast corner, is blacktopped. That street bisects Third, a major
downtown route undercrossing I-405, making convenient access to the down-
town. Normal utilities are available. The steep slopes would require
heavy development costs.
A part of this total ownership, 6.77 acres adjoining on the West,
was recently sold to Gene 0. Farrell for $120,000; a unit value of $17,725
per acre or $.41 per square foot. This sale between Transamerica Develop-
ment Corporation and Mr. Farrell is typical of multi family residential
sales in the area, and was a negotiated transaction. Although typical,
this is in the lower ranges of value for multi family properties, due to
the steep slopes and resultant high development costs. Mr. Farrell anti-
cipated a multi family development when he purchased. A multi family
development is on the property adjacent to the North. In my opinion, this
transaction represents fair market value for the subject, as of the date
of sale.
.
Patricia Parks
November 1, 1977
Page 2
Both the sale and the subject have a large amount of unusable areas,
are located on a steep slope, and are adjoining. The estimated value with
R-3 zoning is: 3.28 acres @ $17,725 per acre is $58,138, which is rounded
to $60,000.
Single family residential land values in the Renton area were analyzed
and studied, in order to estimate value of the property if it were zoned
for single family residential uses.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SALES
Size Unit
Date Price Acre Value Zone Slope Sec. Twn. Range
* 7-26-77 $22,500 6.3 $3,571 G D 1 23 5
7-13-77 20,000 5.0 4,000 GS-1 C 9 23 5
8-08-77 55,000 11.7 4,701 S-R C 14 23 5
7-20-77 7,000 3.0 2,333 S-R C 28 23 5
6-08-77 6,000 1. 1 5,455 S-R 4 23 5
6-13-77 11,000 1.7 6,529 S-R 22 23 5
6-14-77 14,000 2.6 5,385 S-R 23 23 5
4-22-77 8,000 2.8 2,857 S-R C 13 23 5
* 5-18-77 32,000 9.6 3,333 R-S 15,000 C 13 23 5
5-17-77 25,000 3.8 6,579 R-S 7,200 28 23 5
3-14-77 17,500 2.7 6,481 S-R 32 23 5
2-16-77 12,000 2.8 4,286 S-R 12 23 5
3-11-77 17,200 3.0 5,733 S-R 16 23 5
*1.2-03-76 75,128 31.6 2,377 S-R C SK 29 23 5
11-30-76 12,400 2.9 4,276 S-R 9,600 24 23 5
1-12-77 5,000 1.9 - 2,632 S-R 15 23 5
11-30-76 41,613 11.5 3,619 S-R 2 23 5
11-24-76 12,500 3.3 3,788 G 1 23 5
11-16-76 15,100 3.9 3,872 G 1 23 5
*11-22-76 24,000 8.1 2,963 S-R F 23 23 5
12-15-76 32,000 9.1 3,516 R-S 15,000 C 13 23 5
12-15-76 30,000 9.1 3,297 R-S 15,000 C 13 23 5
1-21-77 36,800 7.9 4,658 S-R 15 23 5
2-07-77 30,000 5.5 5,455 S-R 27 23 5
12-01-76 34,000 7.2 4,722 S-R 34 23 5
12-06-76 490,000 50.3 9,742 S-R 34 23 5
7-27-76 60,000 9.1 6,593 20 23 5
9-18-76 1,200,000 154.0 7,792 S-R 35 23 5
4-16-76 165,000 23.6 7,013 w/ft 5
4-29-76 180,000 38.8 4,639 4 24 5
4-23-76 60,000 8.1 7,407 R-S 7,200 28 24 5
12-17-75 19,000 7.8 2,435 G 1 23 5
*These are used as comparable sales.
Patricia Parks
November 1, 1977
Page 3
Under a single family residential plan, the land has strong limita-
tions due to topography and heavy development costs. Utilities and
access costs would be excessive. Since much of the land is not suitable
for single family dwellings, the number of units feasible is restricted.
Noise and fumes from 1-405 are counter to a single family dwelling concept
while acceptable for multi family uses.
Single family residential land sales. adjoining the 405 freeway were
researched. None were found in Bellevue, or in the area from Bellevue
south to Renton. The following sales were studied to aid in the value
estimate:
Sale Date of Price Total
No. Buyer/Seller Sale Size Per Acre Sale Price
1 Berger/Murphy 7-26-77 6.3 $3,571 $ 22,500
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: E433' NWT NE4 SE4 (TXL 36) Sec 1 T 23 R .5
9 Armstrong/Stimson 5-18-77 9.6 3,333 32,000
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SWk NWT SEA (POR TXL 14) Sec 13 T 23 R 5.
14 Divelbiss/Bardarson 12-31-76 31.0 2,377 75,128
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: POR SW1 SW4 (TXL 43,45,62)TGW POR SEr SE4 30-23-5(TXL 14)
Sec 29 T 23 R 5
20 Flora/Hill 11-22-76 8.1 2,9.63 24,000
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: POR GL7 (TXL 16) 95' RIVER WFT Sec 23 T 23 R 5.
Sales 1 and 9 are in an area less densely populated than the subject
area; consequently, they are priced lower. However, the sales do represent
the values of residential lands in the area. Overall, they are much more
desirable than the subject and tend to set upper limits of value.
Sale 20 is located three miles east of Highway 405, just north of the
Maple Valley Highway. This is a superior tract since it has 95 feet of
frontage on the Cedar River and the topography is gentler. Highway noise
from Maple Valley Highway to Sale would be less than the noise from I-405
to subject.
r
Patricia Parks
November 1, 1977
Page. 4
Sale 14 is most similar to subject, representing the lower value
range for subject. Located within one half mile of the valley freeway, •
it is zoned for single family use and is of steep topography. This sale
• also has a greater amount of useful land, and is more remote from the
highway. Overall, this sale is superior to subject.
In my opinion, subject is in the lower range of values fox single
family residential land. It would be valued in the range of $2,000 to
I. $2,250 per acre - most likely $2,250 - with the total price rounded to
$7,500 for the 3.28 acres.
', The two values are:
1
Multi family zoning
3.28 acres @ $17,725± per acre' $58,138 Rounded to $60,000
Single family zoning .
3.28 acres @ $2,250± per acre $ 7,380 Rounded to $ 7,500
Difference due to use (zoning) Rounded to $52,500
Respectfully submitted,
RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE
i ,-- --a,,1 0 S ai-Ti-d
I Frank R. Raney, MAI, ARA
FRR:ec
c
11i
•
• TRAFFIC STUDY
• : . By •
JOSEPH J. MILLEGAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
THE PROJECT SITE
•
The proposed Cedar Crest Condominium site is located east of I-405 in
Renton, Washington. As shown on the Vicinity Map on page 7, the pro •
-
ject site is bounded by I-405 on the west, Cedar Avenue South on the
east, _South 7th Street on the north and a 300-foot Power Line ease-ent
buffer on the south. The property farther south is zoned R-4 , Multi-
family residential. •
.Photographs 1 through 3. illustrate the existing site condition, see
"-page 9 . It is a steep hillside with over 60-foot drop to proposed con-
dominiums from the adjacent road, Cedar Avenue South.
At the northern end of the project• site, two 4-plex condominiums are built.
See Photographs 4 and 5. The existing poorly maintained 'housing to the
north of this property is shown in Photograph 6 . Mill Avenue South which
runs parallel to and West of Cedar Avenue South is shown in Photograph 7 .
The existing development on Mill.Avenue is illustrated in Photogra_h 8 .
The Photograph 9 shows a panoramic view of the hillside. The Mill Avenue
apartments and the 4-plex condominium on Cedar Avenue can be identified
in this picture.
THE ACCESS
Cedar Avenue South which runs North-South is a 27-foot wide street with
a gentle 4% slope down the north.. It has six and a half feet wide side-
walks on both sides. See Photographs 10 and 11.. ' The project site is
located to the West of Cedar Avenue and South of its intersection with
South 7th Street. Cedar Avenue South ends at South 9th Street, see
Photograph 12.
THE TRAFFIC.
Two-way traffic and parking on both sides of Cedar Avenue South are per-
mitted. The roadway with its relatively new and good surface condition
will carry approximately 1000 to 1200 average weekday traffic volu-e. The
peak-hour traffic volume is approximately. 10o of the average daily traffic
.(ADT) volume. The morning peak hour will occur from about 7:00 a.m. to
8:00 a.m. and the evening peak hour will occur from about 4: 30 p.m. to
5:30 p.m.
On November 11, 1977, the staff of Joseph J. Millegan & Associates , Inc . ,
observed and recorded the traffic count north of Cedar 'Avenue intersection
at South 5th Street. The measured evening peak-hour volume between 4 ; 30
p.m. to 5: 30 p.m. was 49 . On November 12, 1977 , the morning peak-:our
traffic volume was measured between 7:30 a.m. to 8: 30 a.m. It was 27
vehicles.
•
•
_1-
These findings are confirmed by the Traffic Department for the City of
Renton which took a traffic count on June 23, 1977 at the same location,
see page 15 . The peak-hour volume was 25 between 7:30 a.m. to 8 : 30
a.m. and 46 between 4 :30 p.m. to 5: 30 p.m. The 24-hour volume was 572 .
The City has also taken a count on June 21 , 1977 North of South 4th Street
intersection at Cedar Avenue South. The peak-hour volume was 28 between
7 : 00 a.m. to 8 :00 a.m. and 66 between 4 : 30 p.m. to 5 : 30 p.m. The 24-
hour traffic volume was 691 . See page 16.
The Measured ADT is approximately 500 of the estimated average weekday
traffic capacity for Cedar Avenue South. The measured morning peak-hour
traffic volume ,is very low and afternoon volume is about 500 of estimated
capacity.
It is estimated that the proposed project when fully occupied will gen-
erate not more than 450 trips . This estimate is based upon recommendation
of Trip Generation Institute of Transportation Engineers.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development is a 90 unit' 4-plex clustered condominium con-
struction.
The estimated vehicular trips per average weekday for a 90-unit complex on
the subject site is 450 . With present ADT of about 600 , the additional
trips generated when the condominiums are built and occupied will not
exceed the present design capacity of the roadway. The estimated peak-
hour traffic will reach about 100 .
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The present traffic condition of Cedar Avenue South appears to be about
500 of its optimum design capacity. The additional traffic volume generated
by the proposed condominium complex will utilize this excess capacity.
However, the following recommendations are made which, if opted, will im-
prove the existing traffic circulation on Cedar Avenue South.
Plan 1: Restrict parking on east side of the roadway during peak hours of
traffic. See page 17 , for results of City - conducted poll which
shows that 500 of people responding to poll elected to restrict
parking on east side of Cedar Street.
Plan 2: No parking on both sides of Cedar Avenue South between S . 3rd
Street and S. 4th Street and no parking on east side south of
S. 4th Street.
Plan 3: Traffic circulation to make Cedar Avenue South one-way southbound
and Renton Avenue South one-way northbound between S . 7th Street
and S. 3rd Street, see page 18.
Plan 4 : No left turn at S . 7th Street intersection with Cedar Avenue South
for the eastbound traffic from Cedar Crest Condominium complex,
see page 19 .
Plan 5 : Remove sidewalk along east side of Cedar Avenue South, thus widening
the road width to 33 ' -6" between S. 7th Street and S . 3rd Street.
-2-
J
REFERENCES
1 . Highway Capacity Manual 1965
Highway Research Board, Special Report 87
National Academy of Sciences
National Research Council
2. Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation - An Informational Report,
Arlington, Virginia
3. Renton Civic Center Area Traffic Circulation Study,
Renton, Washington by Transportation Planning
and Engineering, Inc. , March, 1970.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The traffic count included in Appendix I and the Drawings 1 through 4 are
provided by the Traffic Engineering Department, City of Renton.
The Renton Civic Center Area Traffic Circulation Study is provided by
Victor H. Bishop, P.E. , President of Transportation Planning and Engineering,
Inc.
We express our gratitude to the Engineering Staff for the City of Renton and
Mr. Victor Bishop for their help and cooperation.
•
Ili
II
l
Joseph J. Millegan, P.E.
University of Montana - Major: Chemistry 1940-1942
University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1942-1945
University of Washington - Graduate School,.
Structures 1965-1966
Professional Organizations
American Society of Civil Engineers
Consulting Engineers Council
Registered Professional Engineer:
Civil 1952 Washington
Structural 1957 Washington
Civil 1963 Alaska
Civil 1963 Oregon
Professional 1971 Montana
Experience:
CAA Sea-Tac Airport, Surveying 1943
The Boeing Airplane Co. , Tooling Inspector 1944
Douglas Aircraft Co. , Structural Test Engineer 1945-1949
The Boeing Airplane Co. , Structural Test Engineer . 1946
General Petroleum Co. , Civil Engineer
Bulk Tank Farms, Service Facilities, Warehouses 1945-1949
Harry R. Powell , Structural Engineer
Building and Bridge Structural Design 1949-1950
George W. Stoddard, Architect, Structural Engr. 1950
Seattle City Light, Civil Engineer 1950-1951
Bouillon, Griffith & Christofferson
Consulting Engrs. , Civil and Utilities Engineer 1951-1960
Private Practice as Consulting Engineer, Civil
and Structural Engineering 1960-present
Recent Related Projects:
1977 Partner in Charge of Engineering Survey and Report on
Northern State Hospital
1977 Partner in Charge of Space Allocation and Capital Improve-
ment Plan - Northern State Multi-Service Facility
1977 Partner in Charge of Missile Magazine, OICC Trident,
Indian Island Annex
1974 Partner in charge of Engineering Studies in support of Master_
Planning, USN Indian Island Annex
1972 - 1974 Partner in charge of investigation, evaluation, design
for modifications of all utility systems, Discovery Park
(Fort Lawton) Seattle, Washington
1973 Partner in charge of design for all site work and utility
systems, College of the Bible, Bothell , Washington
A
Robert I . Anderson, P.E.
University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1969
Professional Organizations
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Congress on Surveying & Mapping
Registration
Civil 1972 Washington
Land Surveying 1975 Washington
Experience:
The Boeing Company 1958-1964
Washington State Department of Highways 1964-1966
Leonard I . Schroeter, Land Surveyor 1966-1969
Horton Dennis & Associates, Civil Engineer 1969-1973
Principal , Joseph J. Millegan & Associates, Inc. 1974-present
Recent Related Projects:
1975 Project Engineer for Traffic and Parking recommendations,
Master Plan Update for Keyport Naval Complex,
Department of the Navy
1976 . Project Engineer for Traffic and Parking investigations,
Discovery Park, Seattle Parks and Recreation
1977 Utility Analysis - Engineering Survey and Report on
Northern State Hospital
1976 Partner in charge of Survey, Utility Systems, including
Storm Water Retention and. Sewage Equipment for
Philadelphia Church 90-acre Planned Unit Development
1974 Project Engineer for Investigation and Evaluation of all
facilities, Indian Island Annex - Department of the Navy
Ahmed M. Jaddi , P.E.
Osmania University, India - B.S. in Physics 1951-1955
Osmania University, India - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1955-1958
Columbia University - M.S. in Civil Engineering 1959-1961
Urban Planning 1963-1964
Award:
Gold Medal for standing first in the Class of 1958
Professional Organizations
American Concrete Institute
Structural Engineers of Washington
Registered Professional Engineer
Civil 1970 Washington
Structural 1971 Washington
Experience:
Central Water & Power Commission
Government of India 1958-1959
Columbia University Research Assistant 1959-1961
Columbia University Lecturer 1961-1963
Ammann & Whitney, Inc. 1961-1963
Severud, Perone, Sturm, Bandel , Consulting Engrs. 1963-1964
Severud, Perone, Sturm, Bandel , Resident Engineer
St. Louis Gateway Arch 1964-1965
Parsons-Jurden Corporation, Structural Engineer 1965-1967
The Boeing Company 1967-1969
N. G. Jacobson & Associates, Inc. , Structural Engr. 1969-1971
Wick Construction Company, Regional Manager for
Projects in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia 1971-1974
Principal , Joseph J. Millegan & Associates, Inc. 1974-present
Related Experience:
1969 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility Design
City of Everett, WA
1970 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility Design
City of Bremerton, WA
1971 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility
General Administration
State of Washington, Olympia, WA
1974 Traffic Study and Parking Design
Pacific National Bank Branch
Madison Avenue, Seattle, WA
III;. 1,111^••!, „':h. "��'.i1. '. —1! •1t r l K i�,�a+f.+_elJc_
III;, 4.II1 I , I • ee CO I ��
111JJ.;J�,� 1 t i
1 } i
I II,„„ili�;r�. I1 il,.. • , , 1t, ` _a '
Illltlllli;r. ' t: 14' �; - _ 2"a6ti1�� �- 7 ______;I
11JIIJ4I1IJ''= ! ic:a'. = 0 G
. . t',` -toit.......; .„.1%;• .,. ' 1
• )//: '.. , ..•
1 i ,,,,,...,--7,•••111ti,i,.,,,,y. • ,,,,_,,, ,/,. . .... , c.
. • . . „ . iiiiiii ..,, ,
- • ,i ,, i :
,•.. ._,.. .,., . : t $
sol
Tr L I,gl r: OVA .:-.76-:- ., -, \\ . '''; .
. rt. 1111 1.1 t LI.t \ —.‘ \ -..-..--1—.. .. . ''')Illrir ',1 . 1.1. . n• .:.- . t---.--
•
/.-� JI a I tl ,_ �} """] ` •\ ,1 / . 'LI 1�I l•L i' ,III•i 1 ' '_,,. , x
\1 \ • .�. • . 1 �.�.�:. I'it I ' �' \ —Tra</• A 1 1` I I I 1• I — —f\.
•
Aafaf4A:�cv• B Sa\n-a.t,-..7i -`/ -- f Li „�I- ,, •J•L i..,, t.Ardr .c, •E __A.r-
'I-n— iii \: TI% •1
•
, • ..• --11 •
. . • „...,,,,,.,
•71' .i�� .s ` 1 '"� 171 SM/TiCR7 AvEs !_r�r-r�4•I 1a - RI - , . /• m -'•I cc 1-•11- Q .•:v u� 2���, t r I� III I (�silii1I rr�
�~ a` • v (� k r I11.V�' .. .. .. 1 ` tL1.ieL1cl� Y cG I�1P"i�:. _ a x'IeJ�EEu r' 1 ' R I I
u
` Y"� i B URNEY� • AV E - — • -
1 `� a. RD. • 1_ `5��y/6da., �"�� P1J� '.y:a, I.s.r 1 G��=%.: r-
�. 4�\ C 6 '• . —1 I y
.,„T
. .
.J._v..- V J' �� _ 1 l..F •1',.1., I• I • .�o 2.:E;r:r<ri.L •i uAvcJll'
,...t1..Fte.....,...,,,,tx
riiF \ , /11 _�I
�''/`T. / —JL '' -...,.'` I.. �\ asp ,?,; t.✓`/'V'd. tI--iv"1�1,„,..t-f . !•.• •`,','•I�. =Aw v.1-.
�ii�' ��, r `z +e . 9C14 T.(. :�I I I I I.,L C4117 +
/ sue+ i : / :� ---- .,\i , `�•ly�. 1 ,�
_EL
' \c- }I Y I•
'✓>t!' ./ r 1` FI I L L 6 1 ITNAT'- E__, •., y•y,�, I ,
i.
• • // '� .•�•' / • ... as .4 1r •
cAlailiTl�j.1 1ei:1 I'F, ' i I '`, \ •i•P1
1 .! t^e f 5 • , 1 ;: . . . .: - _k�- ) 1 i'fi'j;rt-, �__�... •?i;his!
\1
1 ;R-14...I , , ": ........ t . I is.
•
--i - •! I I C R48
Y.I . 11 i I I.
l.
i s
� 1I • : I H /.v a.. 6
3"" iiAiJ 11 6 y Y _ K Y �i,' Y �'°I 1 %1 I a i � � ' . � il\IIII:t
.11 1
PHOTOGRAPHS
EXISTING SITE CONDITION
•
, ..71; -.-,:,-/4',,,;;,,,..-14-',:',4,t :tf;3,-,,,tt.,.0-..,-_.A%s,p1.`+tc,--,:...,,v-:',-:;•`., 1,. . :;,..1-k..s.;,,-..„,,,i;.,,;::.,',..;:.t.,.. , .. .. - ,,:.1 •,,,,,, . .
S-0,''.f.:4 .,..,-Tik:,;.,,,,I,..i,&1.0,...-,a,:e,25,14111,-.`sz-4.;:.?-!--,-;:y..i„.1:.e„ .,;-.''...?.,:ic'..• V,--i', N:1;?..--,,.:;1::/ .i': ,,,7,.. , ,., ,,4:'. •s,.. . , . .•
.i,l.45,:.i-4.., ,I—Z.:'-;.-1')A-.. .„';';'.;1'i':‘1.,,S1,1!:',=,,J,-;',1.--7-'4*,;.0-;•,.P.';',%.*-`•;?,',7-','..1.'.:1 ',..,.f,f-, .. :; '':';'.,,,','A',.,'.!',..,---- ;:'...: ' '' " '-';: ..''i'.-' - •i '
. ...1$*...Z...'7i'T.{.....,,gfa;:.Y.: -‘-'.'2.Y15.,‘-'7;,S6-44'..-,f,,,',.,-.4f)i?.,.•i''',,,..'''.'(,".%: •,.• '',4:„..:.-..;,. -...',..-0'...-,:.'-‘,:,f:. -,- •" ,;'. •-• - • ',` ..
'.,,.;.:•,..';". 7,,i,.;::::,,'i.., . ;,„'•;,''.,;;":1'.', .,-`1,,-;'-f.''.'...1.1,,';,''','f',;'-',i';;;.:4';,,,..*.:J::' '„::',. :2. • -,, : ' ' ' ' ,
'', ,':: :':.,'::.-:','-,,.'::':•,':•." ,* :..,.^',.:',..,-. ).,<'.,4,.•,,1.'• ,..,,c,,,..c.,,•-' ,...;,, ;''.,' ' : .,
,. !:--1•• ,':';7,;.;'2,.:,.!:::',.:.'.., ,'.''., .,. ;. : ,..., ,,,,,.--,,,i':!..:,,,,vz,,‘z,.,.,, ‘, , •,• •
'::. •.,',' ,.-.•s '..,V;;.',,.:;:, ' :;'•,'-,'','.1 ,',' ..-;'•;',:•1,-4,...'„;,',;`,".i.,, . ' ,
'''' . .''.. -'2.•'., ,,: ''' .:,.,,'',:;., ...-,,l,":.',:,:-.-.';E.'. , ,, ; „ , '
5,'',. ' (
'..4-• 'iV:%*.?0 " .• 'i 'i".1'. ' - * ''' -.4,.,. -i:-."--,". 4 '4!.44."''r°4--1..r.1.' - :-:rt
r . r.
" •;,....:." ' :.-'f"r-. .7"',.....,,4'...".14. . l'I.Yr-',5"t.4:4
. ....k-g •- . .
. ..„kg,
:„..—
#31
. -
. ,
... .,. ...
R4
tr#
.....,,
....ww: .
4. •
• ::.-r•
ci .. - .
, .
t li 1:4,
W i
No.1
ti ,A `I N.', '4'ipqrfAV/ NI il
f 7N‘ ''. T\ts.\ ','Oit ill-110i/' • , ,
I''''.,- 2*,, .v1;1-, ki•A , fiLcs,,r''r /
1•`4 •• ' I k . . iii • .'-'./ .
v • ..'. i:,
11/ i', :./. , ,
i 4/44 / '
;ii-p4f,-1, /
It
, ,t,' 1‘ 1111,til'ilikgq.i;1 f.S41,.',FA'11,,11,:1-,-, '
t .1 ,c.1111,1,:.114 f.!, 14;54..brii, i • ii( , ‘. ‘,
iirikt, , 41,, J\;ii 1 , . I I
,
t
?, s,..* ' .
;4 ; i.%,i kk P14,4V. Ili, : ),ii i i ,i 4 1 /- •. rl i
‘, y: i •%:01.1,•<,•- • •• ! , ri 14 ii 1 • 4 . , , . ,' ii
.1•
_al
4-,
„P,t
. .003
. .
i,41
1
. . .
.-
. .66
••••• •
• .
" ' • . .
•
.'
„.,k
. .. .
g
,
•
No. 2
. _n
. . . .
. .
.. . . .
••. .
. .
. . EXISTING SITE CONDITION
. ..4,1o:ilAvflifiltfolf, •••'/,:„.,,..,;,,,!:,.,•7:,„1:::..,,:-.?.,,,:,..f.,-,•:,.,-,.,-,:7::...,....,,,,,,,.::,. ..m,':..
. ..c!ipint'll''' i>,.1.,1.0.4?A t.1/" V e;:k.,...f-,,,,;....,;-.......",,, ?..•,...i.,..,.-,-,:,-!:-,,' ..,',.?;:f:,....„,..,,,.-4,;,,s,. •fiv 14,0-Aff/Agili,fir 4 r io$ I. l,.. ,tos.
7,,,,iliql'z-AA PA 4,,, i ;p.- /-;11Y. -.,..::'..,;,.....,-:,'.,:..--';-•..... ..::•.",,-.-:!...6.-.,..i41 ,1
. .v 4t.tv,',)qfro•it;.444/1til 6.1, ,,,' ,,ty'..,,-/ r,.,..,•;1,.'.';'.:.---...
. . . 146triSt4N-4i',01-lifi•Prii'i.it.AiC..1:',\ ,' .i.-.,P, :.:
. t 'y liti;mi,v,eirip;if'`,';' //5/t7 f,i f: /. L,/,-::•',.;.'...;-.:'.., .:,--•.::::.:?;::?..::.?;
', - 11 't ":,(iiiP,tA • :t ',. •.-.j f;,',...„.:• •, •;...„':,Vi .
r 435 tV51'04 1 st , ',. .'i'j:1 '1..••;':'/:•,-,11/,.-.'il:....-
/ ,,.i ' '1,',I .':,(///;':' r;:r,•',••
' 11, !I4131..!1111tiiil litiliti:-Iii 1 1;I:, '41;i f. ,i'Y.I.•:'ill'i 1.1.,' ...•• :.: .'', ----
:till liatit:i•:if It '?' lit. I'1 11' 111/1'.::. . 1.' .' ':‘
. 1
. i. i f 0 p,‘,, iii .1 .: i ffle • ,,. . ..
,:, IA i i '.: i •iq .'• , .'-'• . .. . - ',
, 1,.t. -,' ..i'll 1‘.1 .' .II i
.m , ' • ' i ,'IL, ifi/
,
A.
. . .
...::
•,..-,-,.- . .
-•.of `A):'. '
..,....
. -- ... ,
. .
. .
- ..
. .
. .
. „
. .
' .
. . ,
No. 3
• •
•
. . .. . .
. .
. ,
. . .
•
. . . .
. .
. .
•
. .
. . . .
-1 0-
4—PLEX — NORTHERN END PROJECT SITE
Y..v. ,:Ga , , -z.a,, S1 s- .4,!e.riz•, - -a;r u+' E. -x
s R.. tti,v,•'
',...- am,crr'r, s
..qr
`.,
'rir
II ' S Y y , - i 3T ,-yt , : ' ! Y , ie ' {Z. y a , O ,. � d ,. : S1 P iz''.t? -f ,,, , ,py ,w' s ar V .
; • ,_ ..• `*6• " %. �s 5 s h r S ry ,, , �Y 1r 0 t Y
i Fr. ,, tr 1'y rz ,:; s a 1xaT f'.r.: zv: Y: 4 +Ju„,e
r`a ?: `. :' r s ,,- 113.s " z-'2 g4,•.,,,{- -,.» =Y- -` Jf ;�3;�-, ! : ';.:,.i a,
s^fi-: se. ,t rT .viC ,{a ';f, u:.ft K'h �::"X..'fik�.,+,. a":fci ?',;„,,,,,: nr • .t,cT;.t.,.>".C .,
Aa
fY i�fr
i• :x
fr
.!
t'eJ
r:.i::a:t`.�:,g'r
'f S•' .• . y:= 'y;' io;;l1 ::':;v... 'k~si:i .< 5: � t, " h�j �r • : l *:e ..,T. ,
. ....Ni.>,,:'.�': .,:.:,:...„7,r,, ,,,n:.. .xU,,,. + '�.:,. , ... .,.. ,„t,,,,,; ,1 .4., -,6`;1 ;e:
r ; :.F- G q; d�U t ;
,' � '' =, "Y `- % r•A ' 7" 'u S,:.. .m§[iJ H't:ktl"a7 _r�f:frtr '? *n').a 'JlnJ:_sX w' e• „�{ - , ,`, _ .•1
'L aM tin*'-
Y:p •
: 3 A f.
ro� *A ,g i 9 'rv'y"�. r"i � it ' :• fr .n:%
c . > [t,
•
I , •t f •
r., i No. 4
•
•
,c Z •2 k x 8 a • ?,P ? - t _ -
'r'1 ka } C �i r:r'�? •`''`�� °q '; ' �k'.*{..gy: 4 i ,. .. -4 i"S -x -Jl t'r n- ,
_ �,, r E " �' � b k'S S"C'' {;iY 4 5 'v.7 `y'✓- ,Fa ty- "d{ -
` �i, • I s'SyR�'�"r4t �3(.#-,t "^�f"�r rrzyrt • ? ;ate .^:;,.a:i• ,'.'{='i':tiifi a t �,` /
- • w.r-,r�,r y ,,>v • v,; , ['f l,,•l �'1-,j J". tk =• f ▪ a r s ' .,t„-. t
Oft h 1 r` £ 4 ,
.;;
tl
n;+
G='
, 0'A• -i:.l4 l'41is.,,..P,'.,„.-'.'.4,74,2•-3-',,,.-.,..,--:,'
=r.. Yc;' .i
g.3 `ti' 'v,' = V
VY
q;l-,„
4n pZ-�
� �"jrcs ti,ji
4t 3"
X?,
/ vY..
{ 7 f ::,Y,.r Ya:--a�:
0cl
>rl,� ..)i.3
st ,
t.
a. 'f i
�^ I�-. t, j5. # i4 - «�. S.t:l{A"— < f aye...
F -
C 5
f It No 5
--11— ,
•
I..,d r' i -... 1•-�••'_ it (.r/,.•, • 1,/
,y, • ,� • tom' 1., //r � ', T I, ..
r '' ' ? 'T.':
'' n • •,,c,•-.',"r.,,
.: .--__�
.�
. '1-
• Q r"" lH '
. .-
a
'y ' r �1
wd Ili ,
`' :. t .�� •
HOUSE TO NORTH OF 4-PLEX
•
See Pictures No. 4 & 5 No. 6 .
•
•
•
•
t r
icy ..., r �����ji1 ',
t r
roi $ j
•
. �; y�b. _ �.=.
,¢
sue a .y ,, r ''
ii
a y
MILL AVENUE SOUTH No. 7
•
•
.t..! A, Nk
ililik\ k4 . tr4i • .
pl em It ' I � `` i .' . �,.1 :o I�'����• ,tip ffltga
ti
111.•
a `� II I MIN=w ' .
I
DEVELOPMENT ON MILL AVENUE SOUTH No. 8
v 4..
'i'[
•v
U 4 '- �Ti,- fa ., `;'i0,,tom' l v Y',9• ` Es7 's.
4 —;- 't t o —• :,:' :, •. i y •". ' ..!
t' y 2' �:'i. ,4r ! i-4 1G r v 1 ,, f
� `� sb fir, y r ':as . , , s
, .. h s°: �„ s } / -. •.. ��i. �»
��F-�(/,�
S ii'y tx'(!ti i�r �� { , 4 •�'»•'4 x ,r s � '.42--,,I. • 'ce°,2
! '' ,:;$1 1 � 1 4 r,- ; ri+t.� �, =+•-ram 7 r1
le
i t +'ti,Y
��1e-f L...� '!r i: i :! g ,� -' M'. 1
M'£4� a 'T •S-.a•---' .��p3 ,t, +r� a •s y i'3':`SL t�+�...`,i�yrl�, N
r:A a..4 », , ,tij �� . . , ram, , +, 'III �t `
1V x:1 1 +.,,11,► s'-1 S1`* ?A ; T 5: . Irs" .J!(,1}?'3tn:sr"''r�". 4 ^�. l
•
PROJECT SITE No. 9
,
7sf J :` ,t—"� sN
if x 1 y yj
' �;, r ." � t CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
t1 A6 . [. ' yai..$.' ,
,sty y ^ �
r , No. 10
:fir• .<�., i i�S !� I:
y, , , .4 , �4� y
r
•
it
a r '
� •'a"t.�
4 4 • '` —`�"LL,._' » i 417%7 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH
-, _ - No. 11
_ , , . F ,, -...,s -....,,, ,•:,.1As.'0:04,1',,.....,.VIA_ .13.:11 I kilo"-,-iri-ii- .1,14'
, 'i k 1.',.'y'r \.1)' .., F.:. ,
!• C •.v7Hf, 1. r! ,- 't� ' P- -rIA
t. ,41'1%4 ii rr.1,L,,vir,;.: 4rj t' r 1 r `�,,,.. ; � .' �1ult`-„i1 r,,
,A rY ,Ji1��l'r• 1, �l'ig 1 � L ff.lci i/" li ttr' i.,. .� \IA.-'r Y
11' 6• I fi l r°� .( f{. ,}'r I i 's"vtd` C '� s.GJ' }i l I .J•, :�'t
14I `, '� ` •k� ��a !ir' � J i ' �`.�' l��F�'Svo '�3'iyf e..s.� '�1 6s �!�!��Irf ) r�•,J
1 y %sr ;,, j,�t ,'J `. ,,• 4 s41r=i ,7 .pie I•aia s / r. /I :.%.
�,�j.' � t .�rr� ,'� ' I.�f f•..� !� 'Lr� �' .`�O�k,l�' !!?.� :� N'� r J�} c
? ' ' 'I' t t a, „ , j x°.�$;''r„ _,; ? • ,, ,w" ,, ;.: END OF CEDAR AVE. S
p { t AT
1
. : L l ,r'' �, ; +,t,,1, , t 'A 1;r ' "rr� rSa SOUTH 9TH STREET
.. , 1 ", IPRO is • '. . •
� ,>,. No. 12
...1 d..
_ V E.U C L E-- -VOLUME._.S U111 A-R Y- -
--.--_—._— ,
✓r-. . _._ CITY OF RENTON — — ---
CEDAR AVE S S OF S 5TH ST TOTAL •
A.M. VOLUMES P.M. VOLUMES
--.-___^_ "1b__M.IN. ..HOUR L.Y_----. ...... ... .... _TIME . 15 .MIN. ._HOURLY
.2 • 06/23/77 * 12 :15 * 15
-3 THURSDAY * 12 :30 * 6
2 8 * 01 :00 ' * • . 7 37
•
i * 01 : 15 * 5 -
i - * 01145 *. 9
2 * -02:00 * 6 . 8S
* 02:30 * 7
2 - * 02;45 4. 10 .
;,- - - . ..
. . .. * 03i15 * 8
. . . 4 . • *` 03:30 * `8 .
1 5 * 04:00 * 6 . 37
i * 04115 *• . . • -. • 14 .
— -- - — -- --_*_ 04 i_2 0 - - —.___.— __T__.—.1.0.. __--- __ --
. .. * 04145 '* .... 9,.
..1 - . * 05':00 * 10 143
. * 05:30 * 13. •
i • , _ . * 05145 * . 9 •
:4__ " . ' . . . * 0610_0_* _._.___—..._r_; _.. _IL_:._-------.--6.4_--.-.- ---__-.--_
•
2 . --=* 06:30 -* - ' '7'
•
•
•
___-----_.:.-__3___.:.---_ - _�._�_J__�_ -�*.__.061.45_*._...------_-..._..------------:_- 5..;.._:_..._..-
4 . . 12 . . .* 07 :00 * 14 35
• *' 07115 * 10
5 - . -., * 07130 *
, ::.. \;. :..:.: *. 07:45 * :.: 11
15 = • 26 * 08:00 * 13 . 69
4 * 08:30 * - 17
' 2 , . , • * 08:45 * - 2
: * 15 18
:,,..13 .. .::. = - : ' ..:.. _::_ •---' 0.9i 4.5—' - - :• ... .. _. •--=:-:1_0 •—• - _
4 , 21 . • . . * 10:00 * , ' . . 6 . 41
9 - . * 10 : 15 4' .4
. 06/.22/77 • * .10146 * . ... :...;:.7.: .•
- :.. .....- ?. 1.3 31 WEDNESDAY +� 11 :00 0 .- ' 1. .- 16 . -
3 ,., * 11 :30 *• . :. . 1:
. 11 - • - * 11 :45 * ' 5 ,
28__ ___. — - ---._*_..12:_00_.*_.._-- --- -- ._ ---:.-------_------- -------7__.._.... ...__.__ .
PEAK . VOLUMES OF 33 FROM 10: 45 TO 11 : 45 A.M.. AND. 52 FROM 07:30 TO 08: 30 ?Q
V)::-.1 AM ' PEAKING FACTOR 0.05 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0.09
Ati.._P.EAK_SOUR. ..A.C?OR. Q t.55 PM. PEAK..HQUR _PA.CTO.R...... 0• 72 ...
24 HOUR .VOLUME 572 161
6 HOUR VOLUME 516 EXPANSION FACTOR 1 .00
ADJUSTED 24'" HOUR VOLUME 000011 ,00 .
_____ _--_-_----------_-__---_-_- V EMI CLE-.VOLUME__SU.MMA ty_----- ______----------=-------____,_---______ --
1 eIYY OF RENTON
r' CEDAR AVE S N OF S 4TH S, TOTAL
A.M. VOLUMES. P.M. VOLUMES
-----,.___._15-_MIN. ._HOURLaY.-- -- - - _._-. .....___-TIME..- -15 MIN. :HOURLY
5 06./21/77: * 12: 15 * 9
1 TUESDAY At 12130 * 7 .
- * 12:4 5 - - —- ;_-- E ---- -
10 * '01100 * f9 SO
1 * ..011.15 * 1k -
�- -.4 _01.1.30. _ __ _ -- -=—_ 4) — ... _ .
--- : 4 - : . .. , ' . * 01145 * 2
i 6 ' * 02100 * .--5 S0
------- * 1021:15_... _.__..__..___.__ _____.._122 r.
1 * 02130 * ;1-2)_}
* 02:45 *
-
A 0310 * . ._
* 03130 * '_1.
. 1 .. * 04100 '� ;19 62
* 04 ; i5 * 4
2
. .: ' 1 * 04145 * - :, 7.
....: 1 I . 05100
,
1 '. . ' . . * 05:30 .* .27
1 * 05145 * •
1�.
3 *. 06130 * . 1
3- = .
8 15 * 07190 * . - 3 98
5 * "07: 15 * ` . S, .
. 8 :_ :-' .. -- .:_4.._.0 7.13 0 ..__- ---_-__- ----- -__'I 4)°_�_ .. _---- .---- ------
:10 . * 07 :45 * 9,. .._, -
5 28 ,* oa ;0o * :�'�.r0 65
— — 5 . * 08 :30 * t19)(D
4 * O8;45 * 7.
4_. ,_.1_7� � :�_ 4_..._09I0© .*____. _______.:._—_—_:L _____1.2__.____47-- ---- --_-------
' :7 ::. :::;' ' . * 09115 * 17
3 :,: , : .: , * 09130 * - 14
13 * 10:00 * 11 AS - : -
10 4 10: 15 *- 6
7 - _-._.Qbt .Q.477___*_10 13Q_ _____....-----, —6
7 :: .. MONDAY , * 10:45 * . . 5
.. E9 * 11100 * 4 ', "80
------- -L • • .:< ' .4 1 i 1.1.5—
17 . . 4 111.45 * - 2
____....�5__ ' ._:? _1.2 Z.A .._ - - ..
PEAK VOLUMES '..OF 40 FROM 11100 . TO 12100 A.M. AND 66 FROM 04 :30` TO '05130 P!
:,. AM PEAKING FACTOR 0.05 PM• PEAKING FACTOR 009 .
-.._.:.... .PE..K...H-OUR. FACT01-1....0958 . -_ PM PEAK HOUR. FACTOR .. . 0.56 _..
24 HOUR VOLUME 691 16 HOUR VOLUME 630 EYPANSIOf4 FACTOR '1400
ADJUSTED' 24 HOUR VOLUME 00001 .00
•
L\\\N
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 21, 1976
TO: Del Bennett
FROM: Bob Hammond
SUBJECT: Cedar Avenue South -- Parking Survey
The results of the parking survey are as follows:
21 Residents desire parking on both sides
21 Residents desire parking restricted on the east side
4 Residents failed to mail back their questionnaire
1 Vacant resident
Exactly 50% (or 23) of the residents were contacted personally.
A list is attached showing address, how contacted, and name and
parking preference. •
My recommendation would be to allow parking on both sides in view
of the original intent of the improvement; however, this should be
a Council decision. ,
RAH:ad
Attachment
•
•
c044, N ' 4or :ZT
41/ '
K h
. -I] .
/1 . ,-sk
ii
x.
S. 2ND ST. v CITY
1.4 i1j HALL =e
w `� Q r./. /
• > w . N
• Q •
z / R doh
S. 3RD ST. -
1 VI
w >
• z
S. 4TH ST. Q • 0
. 0 z
w w
U cc
I -
o 5 '
i F . t .
i
\ . .
l .
•
. /)1 i , I II
_ SIT -- f'LAN 3 .
1 } .
\I VON ' • V )
<2-
LIBERTY . •
0
- ' PARK\ . .
. •
•
,
. 5. 2ND ST. 0 /
CITY •
•
1.4 I ui HALL
1.4 >
ui
<
> . ui .,,,,
. • > //' N
.
S. 3RD ST. -
' .
, •
. .
- _,11% -.-.- --1 1 •
1 -
I • vi . . .
•
bi >
. > <
' .
< •
- z
• S. 4TH ST. 1 ' ce •
- < 0
I-
0 z
w w
71 1 I I_
U cc
• -
. . ; .
• .
. .
•
" -
,. . .
- . -- -
• - •,/ .
, ..
. . • No LePrTURNI
IT r— rt.
S./Tt4 s- f.---
A..
. .
. i
, fgolieci A-
•
, .
, Skit
\ .
_ . _
---71--"N"'"10 ' At
l dry...
IIII
„,l i i I
1
y 4e. •
1 (l
I
, p
1
-0T•
•• •
0 _ • • : • .
1:40r' • .``vise
11% .
-_
•
EXISTING SITE CONDITION
,,
No.1
` .,,■,,,� ems.•
\ /
• ,,, . ,. .
, .
,. ,, , ,. ,-,
,--.2,,,,,I,,%„1, -
• , , ,
. „..,...., . .„,„...,„ . pi, 0:f.r! ,,,$i.I/. / 1.. li 1 ,..
A
. 1 t' / 1 I 7 1i " , f,
,1 !• r 4
No. 2
EXISTING SITE CONDITION
•.
,4, / ,!'jY ' f;l.
I
, r vt ,
• S
s
r♦
1
No. 3
4-PLEX - NORTHERN END PROJECT SITE
' I
No. 4
OP
.0110
_ INSet
No. 5
-1 1 -
r.
ti
f .
Si• r- r
1I , ,y
1 gym'
ca � 4. � .:_,' ,.-,......... ',..,,
1 .
.'s 7.1
...41
all
Iiii . 4 1:110V10-44 •
HOUSE TO NORTH OF 4-PLEX
See Pictures No. 4 & 5 No. 6
•
V' Y t
MILL AVENUE SOUTH No. 7
111�4
till
1114:- 111*-- --1-
111.M MilY
N it [ pi
DEVELOPMENT ON MILL AVENUE SOUTH No. 8
i1 rI,i I if,'—
A.. ,,•..
.,9 0.
;..,: ,.,s ,.., _s
r .
.... _. .
mot:,, ' "�. -,, ,,i
...
...._
.!
. . .... .
J .Ali R
PROJECT SITE No. 9
OF I
4,
00 THE CITY OF RENTON
4$ z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
01L
%.• ammo CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD
0
.0 G3- CITY CLERK
0SEP
P
94, Go#
1'.
7 , r
•
The Renton City Council, during its regular
meeting on Monday, Jun:i! 26, 17D,
has adopted QoilKution
A copy is enclosed for your information.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF RENTON
•
Delores A. Mead, C.M. C.
City Clerk
DAM:jeb
Enclosure
•
•
•
•
OF R��
4 �� ® z THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD
09,o co- CITY CLERK
0,9gr�0 sEp-co$. •
June ,2, 1973
. o',,)e `t L :cB `.i t '7,ttorney
onL.on, Washington .J2355.
boom ir. 71c eti).
The Renton City Council, during its regular
meeting on Monday, Juno 26, 19e3,
has adopted Resolution ;i 219 6
A copy is enclosed for your information.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF RENTON
• Delores A. Mead, C.M. C.
City Clerk
DAM:jeb
Enclosure
, r
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO . 2196
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Renton,
Washington has recently recommended changes to the Comprehensive
Plan within certain areas of the City, and
WHEREAS such review and recommendations include an area
J
in the City generally known as "Renton Hill" as hereinafter more
particularly described, and
WHEREAS it has been determined by the City Council and
the Planning Commission that serious problems may result in said
area if unlimited construction were permitted for any multiple
dwelling, commercial or industrial purposes , due to insufficient
and inadequate street access ,circuitous traffic pattern, means of
ingress and egress, and such existingrroblems may seriously affect
the public health, safety and well being of the community, and in
particular the residents within the hereinbelow described area, and
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Renton has passed
an Ordinance changing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for said
Renton Hill , and
WHEREAS the City Council has referred the subject of zoning
on Renton Hill to the Planning and Development Committee and to the
Land Use Hearing Examiner, and
WHEREAS it is .deemed to be iz the best interest of the City
to continue a moratorium on certain construction pending completion
of the present studies and reviews, including public hearings thereon,
and
WHEREAS the subject of rezoning of certain property on
Renton Hill has been heard by the Hearing Examiner, and
WHEREAS it will take additional time for the Hearing
Examiner' s decision to be rendered and for the appeals time to run,
NOW THEREFORE
t .
it;. .,
/
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS :
SECTION I : The above statements and recitals are hereby
found to be true and correct in all respects.
SECTION II : In furtherance of public health, safety and
general welfare, there is hereby declared a continuation. of a
moratorium for the construction, improvement and alteration of any
multiple apartment buildings , commercial and industrial facilities
of every type and nature, for a period of sixty (60). days from
date hereof, relating to all properties affected by a change in the
Comprehensive Plan and subject thereby to a potential rezone
contained within the confines of that area generally known as Renton
Hill, in particular described as :
All that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 17,
Twp, 23 N. , Range 5 E.W.M, , lying east of FAI
405 and south of Chicago-St. Paul Milwaukee and
Pacific Railroad. Together with all that portion
of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 20 , Twp. 23 N. , Range 5
E.W.M. lying east of FAI 405 and north of Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission line
easement excluding those properties along Mill
Avenue. South. extending in an easterly direction
1/2 block more or less to the alley located
between Mill Avenue South and Cedar Avenue South,
north of ,South 7th Street, as noted on the attached
Exhibit A.
The aforespecified moratorium shall not apply to existing
apartments , single family or duplex dwellings or the renovation,
repair or maintenance of same.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 26th day of June, 1978.
; y�.ee
Delores A. Meb'id, ty Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th day of June, 1978..
1 `
Earl Clymer, Mayo Pro em
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. W ren, City Attorney
5- i.
,, ,. , . , ,, LI) it.,., i i //
j . gEr! Ile•i WM':Ile lirj-'il`gle' i IC,A,-a ,
VS' 44 N
/OA 4" /:if ii 4: 14 Ng• •-0- "'t% •II IIIM / sIe-. ‘,
, ,
,
.41/ . -A . _,... r_ , , ,
Is dr si g
...- • k!' 1 11C]li
4. '1(
2. i.','■.•El •"` 7 -a ,,,.. ,ILITrrrr :
.
-'( -- 7-.‘ .------------------A---a'---------qt, r---r-<r----,. ‘,..._
' '.s•- - ii■ ..; , ,.....,-• ...
s Li
:./firicsi •-„,....,..a.. ti.-.4.r -.....,..r..., .,.. lz,,c ra, .2 vizi i
i L • 41 • ' Ima. -111 mot -to ow' -No
'IP ow- -war' 'IN -1",I„.r,..;,„2, 1-6.......... 1. ,
C.4 WC: IP I-11-.- 11:Z ;Ti 17 'Z'V.: 4' '''
"LW•
t :
I Irl '41r,r0 744 SIS
'• 1 . i an no uo
-s no
111MI 0
V• M VD S%
* . eillief 1 71111 Of. 4110.1111.Erl
' EN ,7i.z 4 Am'\,.., ,lalmmiliel' , ,
t illyett , ,
,
-'' . ."-•• in - _ # 7.17.4voimirmi 11A Ili %
VVW '71141ING/113
Ir. 111 . 4, .1.•-: .., .1.....--, ,,, ir,iimml, OfrAidir
ii
NIB IM .., • lIl :14.Eln 3.11; '.1. . ci ill;t\ ' Irm,41111,01 Nriir,
'•', Est as NI II
,it , Or -mar mil - 4,.
t ,s••• 5;1 . bk. t/ / ..---... Irr Tr Illimi•'NI 1
t
mvili 1
IN swill * - ‘ 1.11; yee L/BERTY fl / . 'rip':jamas?4....ivreverrt,-Irellii j
-.. • ow" - i Immo. - • im VIII 1 al jp..4-,FIK: • mrctiver
so a 1 cemeregr
ir, .... mem • • . aira . ,Y i 1
IP. .9b. 1 sim. In.am . - . , 7 CEDA ;
an nazi i liAl,
'in" 1. '''' '‘," PARK f r A R ivtil pi NV LI. y
.., ,... \ IF ...... ...... gibs, 6.,11.40 / PARK
' • MEI 112111 1 - MOM. MO NM a 4 .... .
i
1
wilvink ru-,mr• imarras imii___ !El 1. .0{
1..1.1
ILI' MEM • 111111Mr1 In Ill v .
; .- or,.'101/111 Wrirl inn MN rp. ,c
11•0411n MilPinau '3/".firl ..•
1 ;A:04041111br .
• wiri--=zok ,
.4 • sr IMPPRI ••..
, '" ... si'Fr. .',... •
. i I
't , so nosoc, . . . I lik,orn =Num .,,LL ...„. ---..... .
r I. 1,1,1per ilmur, . . moan -wation MS Mr Ha ----•-• ----•••••-- \
' •----•or is kin . 1 . mg at,f4._ mow • -____,:-N,
. •
t i • NW Maar p ,,,viime,art,141MI .,..B.M.,'
,, - .." .... ''' .--.-- CA4.. I kt
IZ: .11,:1071 : alt5 tk.>m-r. Z•11111.41•1114:dr. .., -
',',. i 47.4••• . MEN' , sir '''"•-•„:- '''‘.4 ZIT; 419 1,4114.9 Fe .--, ,A),.,-47,'"),•'. - • '----- 4-t IR R I ,
... i valor in -, ii- 'Aiit‘...t...-0 Il•%;.;,,• -;,,, .._
S. GIL 3 -1 Nail i, • - .._:._ • • .. or ...v.. ... ir . -A. ',.„,..;,.77,. . N ...---. ,
t 1 1
7. : '• , '4, e •
l' . ' iii 'iiii '. 'i' " ' ° iniu"‘", A;r IA iiiII 11/31F.,/1-';''".:,,• -•%,..,....-., -**4'• ------s ---!) '.- ,
''" 'I I 3' '! • cm4„27.'9 rjp-' am No , ,;,',,, '.''),•, ,, •• •,* to, #••• ',;,,• ''.• '''••=:, '
' •' oi, ISO.'Lai I, ri--. * on ,del i
-, ......, •MD 41M1-• 3--allr.eil pip. ,adarl ‘ .
.• ', is,lorn ,„..ru•im7,W 3-- ,! amour! .;.1 End.. rls-:'./ESsf.$••0,..4.$ .$•s 0 ' s I.4 $ $a.. ..•• '* -
.. ' ' . - M.in.> j-,----.7 ' 0, ......- ••,, 144- 11.'.. .,):_..*:31 '..1•,,' . •. '. ° .„ #, #**°., ,
I
; tiSt- rum m.,,‘z .4,,,, Al 9 ',IS\ --el•••••:', .1,:„.•;•,•,,.i.rig..4/,,•is•,a;•_.aG.6,:. • '•".,4 6,,0 a v+, ,,. . 1
r '' 'F.' ilr ' ..,-. ne6'a' 4--rt--o .6,,',,,:IA . 'cv..:•,.,,;...N.,. .1v-,...:•-.0." •„.... --•-, '".„ Q" .`""u
9-, ---- firt • .,. _ ,
? . , . . IS j'i 4.....Y‘11.7,"tilrZ;V;%,•4...*'4••" *.,01 S it•<Nz a 4''''',/:u ii' ‘ a'
I4''•'''i'.'''''.';'.:A,P-:e*i•!°'°1n7-
I1iri•*>.-4.I gr;cma..gl'11i..4W=sr--,V4pa,fTrn,i.lgliicS.i•ki„G&,I,Lr4.'A6',4.4 g"&"•1__•-
' ; ,
•. ' F1r2O ictl'i11,•A.1i.iLr,r-1•.4111s11 1111‘1.k...• .,7._-7- L.----.• ',.;.'.,'i,;':Z,,'.,'-.,)...,:,`'.i.,-.'r..g..,„v.,.:3"Y`4;.,1....1.;."1,,,,...,..,,%-:,;,,,s•-5.y.4;,`.,',xs,'-0),11...7..-?,'.,'si,:.'s a•7f u)4,:,:,:,,,s.'c1-X°°.I,..,:.7•4.•:'.„".,:-Ist.°.i„,•i 1 I„I.*,l:s 7,.-:"1.„1‘..g,,.,,•4''.*7,.,,,*•4 4
1 6,4*I,'\•,.' ',,,.
• :-----
4. ..I. ,‘..,. ...,..„...„ ,,,..,,,,,......,,.).,..).,:„... . ....,,,,..t . .,
......_. .i,--, ,..--„,1,,,,..,-,,..7,......i.,.....,..,-,,,:, ., .,..,,7,. ,,,,, A'Or!'n-'.. , -• "- '
,....
. - : ----12" to 'K•4r'4",;.4..•*j':•••':..)1'4:.'"47. ;411';'‘','••••,;'.'„,-,' ^'•!,3;A‘:',".-,'`,,Z.")),',...,t5,;),•L'4',-•,, , '' ••••• , ,r, "
; usr7 nok Wri.N11 M.- i ' 14 ''; Ps.' :_-__ ' ,:z1- 4 .'•'...,' ,1.-i'..),`,i•e;'),,,'..-:).1'i.,5-,-rso'.--;,•.,-1 ';:;•!-,P.:'1, ,,'N.14: 1••,--Y,!,i,.. ." - '
,i.• El.”4.- ri- z-, ,If ., \ ',• 4ilt . _ ...e.L__fr... • -,,.',. .?2,;:le •••,•,),‘,,,,.,:?,.....),.,;?•,- - os.4.;.:':.:•,%;:; - ,,V6,,,--;:-.,..,,;; ;-:;,11:,„. •••
, ,..., •„... , am: lar7 11 •m, - <", -4.-1,, ,, 3... .. ir.‘;,;,.:',..",,.::,e-,Th',.1;tc,k-,:;•-'1,4.,:-,•clizv., ..7),,,,,,.,?1,pi?.,,,?.,,,4,,i-4,.,,, - .
.. 1. w.: T....,, . -... 1r rwlwe i
1 1E' ". - ''' '.1•2 L:'-nr'''A-4.14":ti'Y.',",)-N'ii: i.?2,'!.: I,2-%-i."--yi-•.-$1.R.:6,4,.. .el-,.
'3''1. . '''''''''.'').",C,' .''A rh--).'•1; ,--,:;,.:; '4,'•4 4 ;.,.... . ..4••;',.:3:4,,,.t.71.,2;
,- • TB • MI= s 1 ,., -.,.11111T - - 4 t__ ;-.7.N ..-1'. "-Al•-3"" "1-•''1 -,' •"14.1.,") 3..%*.'v.'i..7.11- E. ,•Il N,t1+-6,..ic.1.,,,I, C ..„
"",..1•••;;VNni.'*, .:,,„.4.:',.-4 ,..,..,-N..1,r4..,„Iiri,;;I.,,:i+el 0....e...,71e,-,'0.1.7•••-•*1 ••.
, ftl) pit) , I al- '•'•di- t7"". "
.-.--4- -i4it"-o.,IF:,".;;;;;;••,",3•!;:.;ye'',"re,,,f&f.,,.0,,..i...,4;;;•,,i,'')„,%it.J.?'*,,...i;',:,,,,?i,:••••,
i., .
I -ToT t.- '10 =',_a, 1519.. '\''''''‘t'll'''I•1'.';''::r:';''''''.:$';''':•;2:':':::',''•'.3:',,t':'j,:::5:?:,}'1t'lt''.:::r'';Y:'T:''s":''':');A"vi•'+"''''''.:!!'''''?i41.:1';41.":;41'..N.;:..iff;V::•441-1.::::11.'''''':<!''''.**C:!:1:;1':•:?1:i;;%3:;;',,,:lit%;i7...'141.1:)':1
' ii, '0 •
Aa .4P,/. ---
f
-•,-„Fr-', - _.. - .„,T •
,"-• -
C
..___1' '" 'r----,-$7. 7 +1,1.•
„. ,_ , ,
A •
. !ILI' il .• 0 a a „
I • ,
si • .
VI ING GP I. • i •
' .,,•••
11 1; ' 151110111 . . ;
i., 1j 1-......--t-t el -
4 •s.4
\, /' I-. 4-..... I' 11 • ei. •i 0,• I
, ......- C.
. 4 ' ,, es . II, •
.4 8 . . ,
_. *
f . I .0-.t .• t . V 1.•,.. as 0 ,.. • •
L . Emit! --'''.
‘* * 1111E D. s DS 411 . •#%."9 0.,..
. G . ' a.' asPi4p,e6P:V, ,a ••''''''pa,1.-/.5 ..09.....,.....-
:•.,;., f - I .a•Fs.
..' • /. ,--.3L-..,St_.--'.' 51. 1,4101:0 •• •i.,,* 11,,,,.00- .,.•ca. ..--- ,
...MO ,,
I,i l . .. .. .,.bt •a s$ 4,, .01'' ' - - ....-
• .t• ,.. re 1 ' tt•P'‘I..4:-.1'.. 41.,,4'..,.. , • ...,0°..- CO • .-40°... ..--'-' --' p .
,
GS b•,, # ti 5 ...,,-. ty.e,.......-
•••"'''' 1.%::.....„:„..1........„,./......"'" 4„,1 p....
0
or-TE1/4-cr - ---2- • :L° .
.; , ,„i• r- g ".**,‘,„ t r to .
'II'-T ;1.,: . •, ... -**.*.. 7 4. -..... . -. . ,...- ..•-• i 0.. ..--- -
'.--- -- - -...-4.,---z3-4"' , • -- f„T•ef% _ .
•• ,,.• . N i i -- "--- C - , .. , •
0 -••• -.„
/' ---. -...., . *00eva.
' e$Mr....500.. ••••••••••
' /1 . ....... ...
I :0 • ........_. rg4A45. Id 1114 , .1
/ ..e........._.....es - I ,,,.......---.-.......•.0.-. •
• •
- , I •••••••. _....1.-.- ---.-"•••• r--....
......„7/ -........-,... I ....."'...-.--.'''''... ..- ....-....**.
• 10.,..„....„7:-/V '
.."•••''''''' ,
1 • • • ..„_,,,,,,,
MN
-... ••-........--.....'" ...-•".•'-'40,....
. , .
___-- I
1 1\
- :•::,--;-..-7 MI. d 1 1111111 --------- -- ..-.--
.1
I. , .......--- t
';.--,• sg-e- . , I- __.----,_ V.,_ ---; i ,'1.,:i-,1•1-3, :;1-' 5 :' • I v
, , • ,
, .
. ,it• 4......1-7: . . ii. ' , I /
_ _ __ .. 1 ....
., ...,...-...-,.go=
.......• . .•, , . • -- -
, .
...,.;,.s. . . , 4. •, , . I .,,, - -------,, ,•
, , , ,,,
.y . , , #
..', .,'.'1•111/1111:2 . ' „
.. i 1410 Illb... %I IIVICWVII. f71.t .3621
Gi ...-'--'- - 96,f 14.77 •A fa. , el Mil
" 1
, . •. ........, . , ....
, ,,,s. , lawr4 1 ' 1 s • ''''''''',..;:f...sip4._ ..
‘, \ e. . . • lin 4/. 13
C •• „
• \
• N ").4.j.1 / 1 11112 difiliFtligi .P.414P. 4
•-,,,, . r .•f rA s . •
• • 2 ;".:' ......to,, P01312er' 0 47 4GL
;: .. A001:111ig ,\ N • - ".11144 VP*IP*13?e* ne121011 . 04r,orto
10 IiiiWiyato 4/ Go * 1 '
; .1`,, ,. ars \ •
• • •
• , IF / r- c't 1, !,'
.. .
,,,,f,' ' - ' • ' ''r.;:., , . •
1 .
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - RENTON HILL AREA 1
, • .
, • i
,,,,,..:0, , •. _ , .
•(DESCRIPTION : , THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA
GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405, ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER
ON THE NORTH THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON
,
1 . 1 •
,..,...-•,, - . - ' . ' THE EAST AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH ' )
1
. . :
,,..
, .
..1:,• .:,,..,.! . ..,4 •'; - -,'', ! -•'' •,
q•C' ''' ' ''''' '-' ''' " ' LEG END.° ' . ,
-,1,,,.a?.. .. h•,,...,;,,, r''''., ,''''1,, .• 1 4,
, ' '
' , '
4'1-'' ' * '',' ' *- . ' . - f r, ' ' " ' , , '
' . . MEDIUM-D.ENsITYI . . ,
- •fr,,•;•, .."12.` ,„; ,,,,,,,„. •1 , ,',',..,. , '
trr.'z''1';',1*,' .::::::•' i'.i :';''''';‘,',".1',L.,- ':','... ,: : GREENBEIT• . RECREATIONAL - MULTI -FAMILY
,,...'.-. ... .,..- . ..-. -1. -; ,,,,..,. •,.,. .,•, ,
. .
...-•-,..A.,:,h4. ,--,,,,,,.. ..,,-,•-•...•,..,,.. , .', ‘• . [..21..i„./' . •
.,..:+4.-, .....i..,-,.„...,. ....:••,,,,,,,,•-..; •.,,,„,,, , •, i ,,,,,,, . , , , , E::.1 : ' I , ,
1,,,,,,,,,„:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..-,„,•:,. ..,,,,y.,..,-,•„ ,•,, ,, , -.., •,,,. ' , • . . :.. OD
,?,3,,,I,,,r.. ,. -...,. ,,,,,., , , ,• •,.;.; .. .,. . , „... , . • XfilBIT A .. .
,
;,‘ • •, -•••, i •_.- , • , _. . . • , •
. ,.. , • • i L.
r
2
Renton City Council
6/26/78 Page 4
Consent Agenda - Cont.
Withdrawal of Prior request withdrawn by Ray Brown for Brown/Strand Homes
Request of Late- for latecomers agreement, due to abutting property owners
comers Agreement reaching an agreement to connect to the sewer main.
SW 43rd St. Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason reported completion
Improvements of SW 43rd St. , 3 Lane Improvement by Scarsella Bros . , Inc. on
Final Payment March 22, 1978, and accepted by the Public Works Department on
March 31, 1978. Recommended Council accept completion of
the project as of June 26, 1978, (The three month difference in
Public Works Department acceptance and recommendation of
Council acceptance is due to arbitration over one pay item) and
final payment of $1 ,728.49. The letter recommended commence lien
period, the retained amount of $57,464. 73 be .paid contractor if
after 30 days , no liens or claims are filed against the project
and proof of payment of tax liabilities is received. Concur.
Cancellation of Fire District #40 cancelled existing AG 842-65 Mutual Fire
Contract-Fire Fighting Assistance Agreement, no mutual benefit determined,
District #40 support services to the City of Renton offered on a contractual
basis . Refer to Public Safety Committee.
Bid Opening June 16, 1978 bid opening, one bid received; Cedar River Trail
System - Phase III . Refer to Community Services Committee.
Approval of MOVED BY STREDICKE , SECOND TRIMM, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA
Consent Agenda AS PREPARED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
Renton Hill Councilman Clymer, resident of Renton Hill , handed the gavel
Moratorium - to Councilman Perry and left council chambers returning following
Renton Hill discussion . Councilman Perry presi.'inq during that
item.
Letter from Attorney Robert E . McBeth was read requesting addi-
tional sixty days from July 4, 1978 to allow time for hearing
examiner to render his final report and.Tecommendations and
to further allow time for the process of appeal , Council
consideration, and final determination of this matter. MOVED
RY STREDICKE , SECOND TRIMM TO rONCUR IN MORATORIUM EXTENSION
OF 60 DAYS FROM JULY 4 , 1973, WITH REFERRAL TO THE WAYS AND
MEANS COMMITTEE' FOR PROPER RESOLUTION. CARRIED.
Resolution #2196 Resolution was presented by the Ways and Means Committee and read
Extending Renton by the City Clerk wherein it was determined by the City Council
Hill Moratorium and the Planning Commission that serious problems may result in
Sixty Days From said area if unlimited construction were permitted for any
July 4, 1978 multiple dwelling, commercial or industrial purposes , due to
insufficient and inadequate street access , circuitous traffic
pattern, means of ingress and egress , and such existing problems
may seriously affect the public health, safety and well being of
the community, and in particular the residents within the Renton
Hill area and in furtherance of public safety and general welfare
a continuation of the moratorium was declared for the construction,
improvement and alteration of any multiple apartment buildings ,
commercial and industrial facilities of every type and nature,
for a period of sixty (60) days . . Relating to all properties
affected by a change in the Comprehensive Plan and subject thereby
to a potential rezone contained within the confines of that area
generally known as Renton Hill . The aforespecified moratorium
shall not apply to existing apartments , single family or duplex
dwellings or the renovation, repair or maintenance of same.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, TO ADOPT AS READ. CARRIED.
,
r m
Of )
di 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
U 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
osaiL
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9,0 2 35-2550
O4?4,.6.0 SEPtC 15
MEMORANDUM
June 26 , 1978
TO:. Del Mead, City Clerk
FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director
RE : RESOLUTION REGARDING EXTENSION OF RENTON
HILL MORATORIUM
Upon review of the proposed resolution , it is noted that
the moratorium applies to that area lying east of FAI-405
which includes the Mill Avenue properties . It was my
understanding that by Council action to the Callen request
that the Mill Avenue properties were excluded.
It is , therefore , recommended that the legal description
be revised as follows :
All that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 17 , }'
Twp. 23 N . , Range 5 E. W. M. , lying east of FAI .
405 and south of Chicago-St. Paul Milwaukee and' ' '
Pacific Railroad. Together with all that portion
of the NW 1/4 of Sec . 20 , Twp. 23 N. , Range 5
E . W.M. lying east of FAI 405 and north of Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission line
easement texcluding those properties along Mill
Avenue South extending in an easterly direction
1/2 block more or less to the alley located
between Mill Avenue South and Cedar Avenue South ,
north of South 7th Street, as noted on the attached
Exhibit A.
This revision to the legal description has been verified
with the Engineering Division .
GYE :wr
Attachment
. ..-. ..t �.. ..t, ..3 Fn d ,. ..:+i�lf=.:_: ^s,^.-, ;:;,z, r. .: .it cs^. .,:r;�, _ .,p.: T.!.y
, ,.c � ..,���n - i,,{.�.,�,�:-.�...,.:,..;g,2r�+�.,gc..xj*,n..;di"i.�....,,, ,,..,.q.,:4 .....+":-r:,,:u73!,n.,.,.f"s, ....:S:a1"..,`:i.?'ir._.._ - ,a:',• .n3�ri' .. .a,.f..,�a!"-£ c., , ....
c I -itlit-1 • - . 11.1117 ,t1.4 i E3411:14 II , \LLy ., ru-'," . ‘,/
f :" i ' ;- •1"I riri�i — 'arE ut
4I •
Ii,' Apr. ii '. "' 1 .. .,.. , ; 1 g; "ikni lie an .
''' ":. .11111 m r4.). :...LF „21=r) DI EH ,„ A _....
111 ilfrAl 7i .7s.'
"Rim' TI 11.4 �' 7�Q7 f�
::ir :i ir° II �J' �o a1l C a 'ry' ti+r«r vi r t,a
h.. . `` o• y WI � (� 7 ce/vtrEar 11(11*11
' PARK /' CEDAR RIVET117
i > lib.�,�
ten.'+ tsfss nr �`
i:'' 1 mow i G-
:,i,9 k� 1 n.x�l �1 CITY ./ s,
..0,41Amor
'illidiL
1.' ILLS' b7.,
t jr�w�i " e�, �Lsihf i!� HALL \ .
a m /o { \�
•t omA ��� �A:;2\ -4:4T {0-x♦%I Y -•r11/1•.-{+••lU♦Y• \,
i' W nE1 • tar: r».:'•/Ise.. -{ •s•.. ♦ x{. .+
i1 Cf1. as 4:771 • �y -fD t a �'r �,• Q{♦+ . x- x •;{.f d,4 e
... • . 7 ? = ^70";,1::5 Js: PJ. .• III{ .{{ . •♦ -le, -,r .it•U Y 11 0 IIY
�� b IDOL f:"' its-IP�•�''t'l j:'yf'p�19po•s.1'x♦'►Yx{♦11;\1;x{♦� 1J,•/•III,//;11/�a , '
V.
F - i �I n pt .I N tIll f. 1A J�,;',.5 ,7/j..ii'' . x f.•Y• { �1 \
'Ti�' NTi �y1'7
�� • .LtIrl r.Y:°u�'' ,A '„+ii3'1-',> .�^''��f�''a•t ,�,',.• o• f\�• Y•x
{ Nr if .., �: i 1e. 7. s,„� �t:,T t' :�a ;;, . o u f Y
�C.. -_ Q s�, .r ,-1. ,7-;',!;,;Yo y'h A11n �7.if n .a::.�:: x aJltatil!r�.+'..-..
' � f,' �_ �__ +•�ih.7 f 7': ,j:.'�C�, d'�A• �,�Ij: •1!)a.^d'^r' -�%'4I:'.TA�4
__ i :`.• _ f,76 1,-,i'�,•'•):. )7 L.,• 114 A a-^.7'1'!.,.: •I,T\37,, ? _
.5 4riit
.ur.•.y►+; IG/•: "T+' Ei'r l ti.,l+l:...,, 1'.ti:'..:, ;�•rqi 4> `.
' Z. �� ` y 2 . r1: r; .A. `l.td4'S`:%!•�I}s• .',;;. ,,I Y dr'..7,;
. I ( l;.� = 1L - -- 1.� ._"�' fi',i c ;SA'.; 2 y.•.•t,t<,i..,i.l:d•,'.. f;•3y' ;}Y,+'){,::.,3 'a
f ( I its .- '-- ••; C+•I` M1I' I, s ,-,,P 1..v :,;,, •-:;-'r
I I>: �..)r + I a,.�;l;r�^ti�x. }+3`•,�is aly,,:'.1:n': �' '' \'•I t\ f'.,,,.
N *, .,f.L;, <^ M ,A)yi`: ?,*. +••71'9'jOg•• .:1'i'•^ '1ti,N.7...,.i,1`'!,S•i': S�/I �'7-.'S' • i?i`,^�.`;rl;.
I,: • lei- il_ pd `ni•*, •.a'}. .i>�ti,' Y;, Si•',•,L..� ; x'.+7;! n'r`'-;;)1.,
I, _ i.
1 �.P, '± .- _ • M J %,•'SI%:,;0s*�*,11.tv,.•.`q ...�'.,}:S-.1� ;,it.i"'1. J 1,, ,,:.7,1',,( .; ,,,
•
7- , , f .6 n ` • . •
'I • I
- 1 ' • r i , 72. ..-_
; '''' / ;°1-'it 1---7 „il , „ ,, ..
•
•••A K .J • f It IT am Y . tf •{ /'x//�•.I I f' / •\{"'
I' O i�Q• 1`• i 4 L�—.t.,., oPNSlC1P♦II•� I i4 �'
/a JF.
) / ,
,s t♦ n 'Y.NaIfc •I11 { / `�► .....4/ _ ELF1-9'
II as j ,•#*i - „• ; •'I,. 5 ....,,..0
•
•
'..: '..''' , .tlign -",1
, s • \-___7_4.
,_122
ell
"17211:"
N al• f d I' ,Y •`\ MI
\ /6t . 12 O ,yam ♦.i 1
N • • \ UMNILL 4;1'.'e• g runiECD'', ($itp901/4
.fl COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — RENTON HILL AREA 1
S .
1 ' ' ( DESCRIPTION : ' THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA
? '`' GENERALLY BOUND 'BY FAI-405 . ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER
.(,
•+;< ON THE NORTH , THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON I '
•1:1
THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH )
{ ; LEGEND:
', MEDIUM-DENSITY, -
o-.l GREENBELT RECREATIONAL MULTI -FAMILY
I
4XHIB, T A
. i I �}
i 1
111 Of
.► ,.ziw'•-!! o THE CITY OF RENTON
V 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
2 .41, o
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
,o �� L. RICK BEELER , 235 -2593
ORTfO SEP1°°
June 2G;, 1978
TO: Councilman George J. Perry, Chairman
Planning and Development Committee
FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
SUBJECT: Renton Hill Moratorium
Per our conversation of this date, the purpose of this memorandum is
to apprise you of the expected publication date of my recommendation
relative to rezone application, R-178-78, City of Renton initiated
rezone on Renton Hill. Due to our continuing public hearing schedule
and the necessity for receipt of legal opinions regarding the matter,
a final recommendation may not be available prior to July 20, 1978.
However, every effort will be made to expedite a recommendation as
soon as possible. •
Please keep in mind that a 14-day appeal period is required following
publication as well as a seven-day waiting period by the City Clerk
prior to placement on the City Council agenda.
Sincerely,
1 i 7
•
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
OF R�'t
~' 410V :sf iagn, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY® RENTON,WASHINGTON
_ Tw 'Sn'-+ POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 255-B678
o ® ..1 LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
09gT�b � ���P� • June 23, 1978
SEP
MEMORANDUM
TO: Del Mead, City Clerk
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Re: Resolution - Extension of Renton Hill Moratorium
Dear Del:
•
Enclosed herewith is a proposed Resolution extending the Renton
. . Hill Moratorium for an additional 60 days .
Lawrence J. Warren
LJW: nd
Encl. .
cc: Ways & Means Committee
Mayor
Council President
Planning Dept.
,FaeevewAc..------
GOUGE, MCBETH & FAULL ''`'RECEIVED
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
H. DONALD GOUGE P. O. BOX 26
ROBERT E.McBETH 505-B SOUTH THIRD STREET �I Jl1N `�2 I9�1"i
GARY F. FAULL _ r
RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 " ,CITY OF REN�ON c
ALPINE 5-5600 MAYOR'S OFFICE '
June. 21, 1978
The Honorable Charles -J.' Delaurenti, Mayor
and Members of the Renton City Council
Renton Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: Renton Hill Moratorium
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
Mr. L. Rick Beeler, the City of Renton Hearing Examiner, has
just concluded a lengthy two-day hearing on the 'City`s appli-
cation for rezone of certain multi-family zoned property on
Renton Hill. A wealth of material, evidence and testimony
was presented to the Hearing Examiner by both sides 'in this
hearing. In view of the complexity 'of this case, and the
wealth of material presented, Mr. Beeler, at the conclusion of
that hearing, asked all parties for additional time in which
to review everything presented and render his final report and
recommendation. All parties 'concerned then agreed, on the
record, that Mr. Beeler might have 'thIrty. days in which .to
file his 'report, rather than the 'fourteen-day period provided
by City ordinance.'
On May 1, 1978, the City Council extended the moratorium which
had previously been imposed upon' the 'issuance 'of building per-
mits on Renton Hill, extending that moratorium until July' 4,'
1978. Since this matter will not be 'res`olved by the expira-
tion of the moratorium, we are now asking that the moratorium
be continued an additional sixty days to allow time for the
Hearing Examiner to render his final report and recommendations
and to further allow time for the process 'of appeal, Council
consideration, and final determination of this matter. All
parties concerned are working diligently to get this matter
resolved as 'soon as possible, and we would ask that the mora-
torium be continued for an additional sixty days to allow this
process to be completed in an orderly fashion. Since that
cannot be accomplished by July 4., 1978, we sincerely hope that
the City Council will pass a new Resolution extending that
moratorium an additional sixty days for the reasons set forth
above.
Ver t ly y•ifrs j
ROBERT E. McBETH
CC-James Irwin, Attorney for Attorney for Renton Hill
TransAmerica Develop. Co. Community Association -
Renton City Council
5/1/78 Page 3
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
•
Final Payment Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason reported completion of
New Fire Station Phase I of the new main fire station, fire signal installation at
Phase I S 2nd St. and Mill Ave. S. by Signal Electric, Inc. 3/31/78, accepted
by the Public Works Dept. 4/9/78 and recommended Council accept
completion of the project as of 5/1/78 and final payment of.
$18,313.78. The letter recommended the retained amount of $5,074.01
be paid to the contractor if after 30 days, no liens or claims are
filed against the project and proof of payment of tax liabilities
is received. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
REQUEST OF PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR.* Upon inquiry from Councilwoman
Thorpe, Public Works Director explained the State requires two signal
heads even though only single lane of traffic. Councilwoman Thorpe
asked the Administration for written report on that matter explain-
ing alternates used by other cities. Councilman Stredicke inquired
for the record re City of North Bend signals, being advised by
Gonnason that any new signals would have to comply with State Code.
MOTION CARRIED.*
Demolition of Letter from Park and Recreation Director Webley recommended
Old Earlington payment and project acceptance for demolition of the old Earlington
School School by Center Dozing, Inc. , $6,165.90. The letter also recom-
mended payment of the retained amount of $685.10 if, after 30 days,
no liens or claims are filed against this project. ,Moved by .
Thorpe, Second Shane, refer -the item to the Ways and means Commit-
tee. Councilman Stredicke explained Council concurrence auto-
matically placed the item with the Ways and Means Committee,
SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
RECOMMENDATION'FOR PAYMENT. CARRIED.
Medic Services Letter from Fire Chief Geissler presented copy of proposal for
merger of the three south King County Provider Groups for Medic
service, along with copy of by-laws and budget for review and
comments. The letter reported that motion was made at recent meet-
ing that Valley Provider Group would recommend by-laws and budget
for adoption providing King County funds the total cost of the
Medic service for the three groups (Federal Way-Auburn, Highline
and Valley Medic Provider Groups) . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND
CLYMER, REFER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. Councilman Stredicke
requested the Committee review the report and ascertain that Renton
has balanced one man, one vote consideration for number of people/
dollars re Provider Group. MOTION CARRIED.
Sister City Letter from'Shinji Takase, Mayor of Nishiwaki , Japan, Renton' s
Sister City, thanked the Mayor and peoples of the City for kindness
shown and welcome given during recent visit, looking forward to
visit of Renton delegation in June. (Information)
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Shane noted recent robberies in the area and requester:
more Police time in patrol of neighborhoods rather than traffic;
Councilman Shane also requesting adequate street lighting; also requesting blinker
(caution) intersection signals at other than peak traffic time;
also requesting spring clean-up; also requesting sanitary sewer
LID in Kennydale area West of Edmonds Ave. NE.
Building Councilman Perry noted the request of Fred Callen for building
Moratorium permit in the Renton Hill area has now been satisfied with the pass-
Renton Hill age of Resolution ;#2179 (See Page 1 ) and lifting of building mora-
torium on Mill Ave., S.
r _
AUDIENCE COMMENT C. Judkins, 13320 S.E. 99th, representing Northwest Steelheaders,
expressed concern for planning of the Cedar River Trail , Phase II ,
Cedar River Trail that access is available for car top boats to river edge, with
Plans special concern for Senior Citizens and adequate parking. Mr.
Judkins asked to meet with officials to review. Mayor Delaurenti
noted willingness to meet and include the Planning Department.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.
9:03 p.m.
Delores A. Mead, City Clerk
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK May 1 , 1978
CEDAR RIVER TRAIL SYSTEM, PHASE II
Bid Opening - April 20, 1978
AA
Contractor BB EEO Base Bid Including Tax Alternates
Sun Up Construction, Inc. X X $739,260.00 No. 1 - + $45,000.00
12650 Northrup Way X No. 2 - + $55,000.00
Bellevue, WA 98004 No. 3 - + $ 4,900.00
No. 4 - - $23,625.00
No. 5 - - $10,259.00
Alternate No. 1 - Observation Tower - Add
Alternate No. 2 - Picnic Shelter - Add
Alternate No. 3 - Play Equipment - Add
Alternate No. 4 - Alternate Tree List - Deduct
Alternate No. 5 - Alternate Shrub List - Deduct
Consultant's Estimate - $668,800.00
PLANNING AND„ DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE,"REPORT •
. May 1, 1978. . ,
The Planning and Development Committee recommends
• that 'the';r attached:"reso].,ution oin .regards ,to con-
tinuing,.. the '.moratorium on "Renton Hill for an
u', .- additional.isixty': (60) 'days be', read' and adopted.
t _ , '_". ,tip n.t`r
.,...„4‘;'' —4::- 9- ,-, -
, ge Perry, Chairman: .'-. �: .
Patricia Seymotr-Thorpe
-dicionot-iLw.......) (4 .4t4.......foiCO .
• Barbara Shinpoch ..
,ae .....' cr.....e.......„, v- 462-e---1.,..ap„f2,74 (...„ey--A---7,-----, ,
RENTON CITY COUNCIL ' ;:.
Regular.,,Meeting' , . •4 .::
May 1 , 1978 ,,:. Municipal Building
Monday, 8: 00 P .M.
Council Chambers
MIN U. T; E S
CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
and called the regular meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President; BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M.
COUNCIL STREDICKE, PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE, GEORGE J. PERRY. MOVED BY
STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPSOCH,. COUNCILEXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN
THOMAS W.. TRIMM.:':` :CARRIED.' " MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH,
EXCUSE COUNCILMAN'`CHARLES F. SHANE.:` CARRIED. Councilman Shane
arrived at, 8:08 p.m.'.
CIIY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, Acting City Attorney;
PRESENT GWEN MARSHALL, Finance' •Director; ' DEL MEAD, City Clerk; WARREN
GONNASON, Public Works Director; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning
Director; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director; RICHARD , •
GEISSLER, Fire Chief; CAPT. BUFF, Police Rep. , DONALD CUSTER,
Administrative Assistant;
PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle.
MINUTE APPROVAL Moved by Stredicke, Second Perry, Council approve Minutes of
April 24, 1978 as prepared and mailed.. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY • ,
THORPE SECOND CLYMER, APPROVAL OF MINUTES BE CONTINUED TO NEXT
WEEK. . ROLL CALL: 3-AYES: CLYMER, SHINPOCH, THORPE; 2-NO: PERRY
AND STREDICKE: MOTION CARRIED;
AUDIENCE COMMENT Pamela Jarnigan, 917 S 28th Ct, commended Council for joining the eco
nomic boycott of,states:which have not yet ratified the Equal Rights
Amendment: `sY'
OLD BUSINESS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented committee
Ways and Means , report noting review of °.the'Land Clearing Ordinance as proposed
Committee Report by the Planning 'and'Development Committee and returned the ordinance ;; ..
Land Clearing with a recommendation of "do not pass." . The report further recom-
Ordinance mended that the subject matter of _land 'clearing be referred again
to the Planning and Development 'Committee. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND
CLYMER,; COUNCIL CONCUR IN '.COMMITTEE REPORT:•AND REFER MATTER BACK
TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT. COMMITTEE..' .ROLL CALL: 5-AYE:
CLYMER, _SHINPOCH," STREDICKE, THORPE=AND'`PERRY; :1-NO..: SHANE.
MOTION CARRIED. '
Travel The Ways and Means Committee report recommended approval of 4ilY:.
Authorized travel request by;:Police .Officer"McKenney. and Fire Inspector
Wooten to attend annual- seminar, Northwest Fire and. Arson Investi
gators, Eugene Ore. 5/8, - 12/78. The report also recommended
advance travel funds in amount, of $177.75 per officer. MOVED BY
CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL:CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED
•
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman; Perry presented committee:°
Development report recommending reading and adoption of a resolution continuing
Committee Report the Renton Hill moratorium for an additional 60 days. Councilman :' ' '
Perry noted present moratorium..•(Resolution #2137 9/26/77) expires
- Resolution #2179 5/5/78. . Councilman, Clymer;'leftthe :Council Chambers and took no
Renton Hill part in any action or discussion on this matter. City Clerk Mead t,
Moratorium on read the resolution, extending the moratorium to all properties in `,..
Building the Renton Hill area affected 'by, a change in the Comprehensive Plan..
Extended and subject to a potential rezone.' MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH;',''
COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ Upon inquiry, Councilman Perry
noted wording eliminates Mill Ave. S from the moratorium, and noted
for for- ,the'record .that;.extensions'of, the moratorim'was requested as the
Staff has not completed requirements.";' Planning Director Ericksen
noted work was.at;,,preliminary,,'stage and anticipated arranging a,
' June hearing date ;-Acting;: Ci:ty;'=Attorney Warren noted necessity :of',: ' •
resolution due to writ.`of 'certioari,.filed ,against the City and a '
Staff member with conf:l,ict;<<of� i`nterest '- MOTION.:CARRIED.
Councilman Clymer.returned`,to:zthe::°:::Chambers'. a
(
pF R-e
4 �A
z -: ', < o OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY . RENTON,WASHINGTON
d "f '�1r.; 2: POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678
p Q' LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
4,4TF�SE PI
April 25, 1978
Hon. Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor
Members of City Council
Renton Municipal Building
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: Renton Hill Moratorium
Dear Mayor and Council Members :
With respect to my letter dated April 24, 1978, concering
Renton Hill Moratorium, a review of our file shows
that the moratorium will run out on May 5, 1978 instead
of June 5, 1978.
Very truly yours,
Lawrence J. Warren
City Attorney
LJW:nd
•
r, \
;11.4\
A ti 4P Prn^ ¢ 0 •
)\1\ U fc ii i t
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEYS RENTON,WASHINGTON
O ��, ti ,y POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 255/8678
CO
A j
LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
O �
,QAT� SEIA- April 24 , 1978
•
•
•
•
•
Hon. Charles J.. Delaurenti, Mayor
Members of City Council
•
.Renton Municipal Building
Renton, Washington
. Re': Renton Hill Moratorium
• Dear Mayor and Council Members : •
A check of my file indicates that the Resolution
regarding building on Renton Hill (Moratorium) would
have been passed on, December 5 , ' 1977 . The way the
Resolution is drafted there would be a 180 day moratorium
which would run out approximately June 5, 1978 . The .
Council should be aware of this and be prepared to extend
the moratorium until the zoning action has been completed.
Very truly yours,
•
•
•
Lawrence J. Warren
LJW: nd •
r f
Renton City Council
4/10/78 - Page 4
CORRESPONDENCE & CURRENT BUSINESS (Continued)
West Hill Joint stated that Water District No. '14 had also dropped out of the project.
Water Supply He presented the alternatives the City had in continuing the project
Storage and and what each alternative would cost the city in order to take advan-
Transmission tage of the Referendum 27 grant, decision on the matter required by
Project 4/13/78 in order to take advantage of the grant. Considerable dis-
cussion ensued. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, TO REFER
THE ENTIRE MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED
BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY THORPE TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION. CARRIED.
MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY SHANE, TO DENY THIS. SPECIFIC PROJECT.
MOTION CARRIED. MOVED'BY THORPE, SECONDED BY SHANE, REFER THE SUBJECT
OF WATER SUPPLY NEEDS FOR THE WEST HILL AREA TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE
FOR STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED.
Renton Hill ' Council President Clymer excused himself from the Chambers and took
Moratorium no part in this subject. Letter from Fred C. Callen, Callen Realty,
958 Sunset Blvd. N.E. was read which requested clearance for a building
permit on property located at 430 Mill Ave. S. ; the letter also stated
that the description in the moratorium on Renton Hill was in error
and there had been no change planned for Mill Ave. S. in the Compre-
hensive Plan. City Attorney Warren said that he had talked to Mr.
Callen and the moratorium resolution did not allow a building permit
to be issued and that he must apply to the Council . Councilman Perry
noted the moratorium included the entire Renton Hill Area, everything
easterly of SR-405. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHANE, TO REFER
THE LETTER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDA-
TION. MOTION CARRIED. Council President Clymer returned to the
Council Chambers.
Claim for Claim for Damages filed by Venita Mitchell , 667 Edmonds Ave. N.E. ,
Damages alleged personal injury for defective sidewalk on N.E. 7th St. in
Venita Mitchell an undetermined amount. MOVED BY SHANE, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, TO
REFER THE CLAIM TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND THE INSURANCE CARRIER.
CARRIED.
Fire Pumpers Letter from Fire Chief Geissler reported that he had met with repre-
Not Up to sentatives of Seagrave Apparatus Co. and Western States Fire Apparatus
Specifications in Portland to discuss rejection of the two pumpers and suggested
they come back with a plan to build two pumpers to meet the city
specifications and time of delivery to be presented to the Council .
Chief Geissler noted he had not heard from either of the companies
and recommended the matter be referred to the City Attorney. MOVED
BY SHANE, SECONDED BY PERRY , TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY
COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Perry inquired as to who was authorized to sign for registered
Mail Delivery and certified mail for him and was informed by Finance Director Marshall
that all mail was received in the Print Shop and any instructions from
him would be carried out.
Information MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY SHANE, THE CITY ATTORNEY RECEIVE A PACKET
Packets for OF ALL THE MATERIAL RECEIVED BY THE COUNCIL. MOTION CARRIED.
City Attorney
Capital Improve- Councilwoman Thorpe noted there was often controversy about capital
ments List improvement projects and who was present at discussions and thought
it appropriate for the administration to meet with staff and draw up
a list of capital improvements; new South End, Fire Station, new City
Shops, etc and establish priorities. MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY
TRIMM, SOMETIME BETWEEN NOW AND PROPOSED BUDGET, THE ADMINISTRATION
PRESENT TO COUNCIL A LIST OF PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
WITHIN THE CITY FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS. CARRIED.
Adjournment MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.
The meeting adjourned at 11 :00 p.m.
Maxine E. Motor, Deputy City Clerk
jt
•
Renton City Council
4/10/78 - Page 3
ORDINANCES & RESOLUTIONS (Continued)
Ordinance #3215 Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final readings
Uniform Plumbing of an ordinance establishing by reference the Uniform Plumbing Code,
1975Editiong1975 Edition, and all amendments thereto and amending the schedule of
Code,
fees for permits (First Reading 4/3/78) . After reading, it was MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ.
ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance #3216 Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final readings of
Uniform Housing an ordinance establishing by reference the Uniform Housing Code; 1976
Code, 19Ho Edition Edition, and all amendments thereto (First Reading 4/3/78) . After
reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT
THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES . MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance #3217 Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final readings
National Electrical of an ordinance adopting the National Electrical Code, 1978 Edition
Code, 1978 Edition by reference hereafter to be designated as City of Renton Electrical
Code (First Reading 4/3/78) . ' After reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL:
5 AYES, CLYMER, THORPE, STREDICKE, SHINPOCH AND TRIM. 2 NOS, PERRY .
AND SHANE. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance #3218 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended first, second and
Uniform Mechanical final readings of an ordinance adopting the Uniform Mechanical Code,
1976 Edition. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO ADVANCE THE
Code, 1976
ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. MOTION CARRIED. After read-
ings, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, TO ADOPT THE
ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance #3219 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended first, second and
final readings of an ordinance approving and confirming the final
L. I .D. 306
Sewers in Vicinity assessment roll of L.I .D. 306, Sanitary Sewers in Vicinity of N.E. 7th
of N.E. 7th St. between Sunset Blvd. N.E. and SR-405. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED
Between Sunset & BY SHANE, TO ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS.
SR-405 Final Roll MOTION CARRIED. After reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED
BY SHANE TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of an ordinance
Alhadeff Rezone changing the zoning classification of property located at 1332 S.W. 16th
G to Trailer St. , abutting the western boundary of the Longacres Trailer Park, from
Parks G to Trailer Parks. After reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED
BY SHANE, TO REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.
MOTION CARRIED.
Resolution 2178 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended adoption of a Resolution
Bad Check Fee calling for a bad check fee, not to exceed $5.00, for bank checks
Charge drawn in favor of the City which are dishonored by non-payment.
After reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SHANE, TO ADOPT
THE RESOLUTION AS READ. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
Parkwood Access Petition from residents on Edmonds Drive S.E. circulated by Alison
to Edmonds Dr. SE Satterlee, 2010 Edmonds Dr. S.E. and Donna Delude, 2016 Edmonds Dr. S.E. ,
represented 100% of the homeowners on the street, with the exception of
one owner living out of state, was presented. The petition stated the
residents of the street did not want the traffic opened to the Parkwood
area due to safety and existing traffic conditions . Letter from Rick
Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner advised the subject of traffic circu-
lation and access relative to Edmonds Drive S.E. would be reviewed during
final plat application for Parkwood Division No. 3 which had not been filed
with Examiner to date. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, TO
REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR NOTIFICATION AND THE TRANS-
PORTATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED.
West Hill Joint Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason explained the status of the
Water Supply West Hill Reservoir and Distribution System project, for which the
Storage & Trans- City had accepted a grant of $398,357 under State of Washington Referen-
mission Project dum 27; project to have been a joint project with Water Districts 14,
Ref. 27 Grant 63, 69, 77 and 88, however, Districts 77 and 88 had not approved the
agreement and would not join the project. Mr. Gonnason introduced
Mr. Ron Heinke of Harstad Associates, Inc. , 1319 Dexter Ave. N. , Seattle,
Chief Engineer, who pointed out on the map the proposed project and
•
if„
� CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES __------
INSURANCE
,. , #1234:5-,-,
.H. ' 958 Sunset Blvd . N. E. 4 "9 151 d''
Renton, Y�:'ash. 98055 0 <C61 . /,9 co
T:.Iarch 5, 1978 ��/o <
.� 8
`�.'} F44-- .per ei) 7-1'
The Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor sA, )0 u[�, �"
Members of the City Council
Renton_ Municipal Building .
•
Renton, Wash. 98055 .
Dear Mayor Delaurenti;',:
& Council Members :
In my letter -of Feb. 23 , 1978 , I requested clearance for a
building permit on the property described as follows : Lot 8
Block 5 Town of Renton, according to Plat recolyded in nlyVolume
1 of Plats , 'Page 135 , in King County
known
as 430 Mill St. Renton,: Wash.
I Talked with the city Attorney and the Planning Dept. and
was told that the description in the moratorium was in error
in that there had been no change planned for Mill St . in the
Comprehensive Plan.
As the City Council. is the body :to act upon this matter, . I
' hereby request the proper action 'be taken to clear the way
for a building permit.
Sincerely, .
- 2 6d&J,
}Fre' d C . Callen ,
CALLEN REALTY
958 Sunset Blvd. N.E.
Renton, Wa. 95055
BA. 6-3011
i
L.f
1'�J — !'- L.(' _
r RCri fro l 4o1A 717 1,uU1,
. Renton Hill rezone ,, .
preparatiQflSIOW
' Work is going slowly on the prep- ' According to Planning Depart-
aration for rezone hearings involy- ment head Gordon Ericksen, the
ing property on Renton Hill,the City department has two staff persons
V
Planning Department reported last working on the preparations,but its
week. current work load is heavy. The
That department is responsible for process has been complicated too, '
making recommendations on at least Ericksen said,by having to consider
seven or eight parcels of land to be rezones separately rather than the
considered for rezones by the Hear- hill as a whole. Ericksen said the
ing Examiner. department still is unsure of how
The City Council sparked the re- many parcels are involved.
zone process last year when it ap- Ericksen said, however, he ex-
proved changes to the city's com- petted the first of the hearings
prehensive plan recommended by would go before the Hearing Exa-
the Planning Commission. miner at least by summer.
The rezone process was first
_-__-- - — - -- sparked by hill residents protesting
development rumored along Ced=Ir
Avenue South.The land is owned Uri
Transamerica Title Co.,the firm that
promises to sue the city if it disag-
rees with results:f the rezone hear-
' ings. . -
. Ar..' '�'� 1 J':J
OF
'4., .,+. -- ,. ':,yq::a �+r� � - �
.t:'x'
f ,
.f'"
.X
O
7J' ,
•
,i' ... ,,- ;''',ter ', Z
';5 ,:;:..-f•'c':.', .-' ;' OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY RENTON,WA$HINGTON .
1 ' `` '.., :....,......POST OFFICE BOX 626'', 100. '2nd AVENUE BUILDING, •• RENTON;WASHINGTON 98055 255.-8678
•
•
•
•
•
� '.LAWRENCE.J.WARREN, CITY.ATTORNEY •'DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
'f'a` o44Tfp SEP��IO
March ;6`=, '1,9 7 8•.
•
•
r :1'
Mr. • Fred
`.0 Callen
'•"a lt
'.
Call
en R
Y..
958 'S -
uns'e:� v
t .B�I d' N.,•E
ti :
8� 5i5 '--'' �4 :�ar,F.:: ;,;=:
t1#c.,:' en on` Washiri to. ' � 0 `_
=
i
a�
De ar
•Mr 1�l e`n'. 'a;:
_ ;
Y r
l ,,
•
u e.'t"
�; e eb :.liar` ::2,'3� `:�^: 7 a, ',';'.
� y°! s1.9 ,8 �,, ddressed•.�•to:,Ma or
D
el a ur.e
rid: o�:' 'C u-ii ' � 'M m�. l'�, e b'ers';�aias. :.b;e" n:�.referred :;.L'�` a to nc
f 0 ff r'o is r'
Y-
t., _ "jli ,fri '.ry-k..
.t':
>'J 1' tr,:<r,
f'„
le s i�'
e''� d xs ed''
�t
s d c,u s sr d' "a� rie C -
it,
,iaXiti� {,,,.I ,,_ {..., [•i:'i' =}^ }gq.:. :t�,N...t,}i>i ,E^.^`:::ar,;:yJ qr: ; _ • ',ix
-k,,; 't:b;'li',{;gib`% ;;�"'''?
s✓nw (
<r,
<„2 •51�'
t:
,
nci �t"'`r
,= u l:: m ,
e'liri
u r �-7°'
`��:'. � S` .Tr
_ ..:r... dry.`,
• Yi.
.�, .fir,-,
Y�
^F' :'i. :fl'9`'p:',
.,` iJ 1�
f
r''
'd'e•ci derd`�`
u'�r+; ;'orr
`erg
Y+
e •ri�
r�. P;^ Y=i" h
+F, -
.r",
''<`1
nt,,f+r :y{
e a' `r'-1•'d�•`sc
▪ ' Ienton'>: .,�1 •
,-.` , fc', �- t}i.e '..morr `forium :'`:-`p ;'i:. �,
, r:Y" 'i F` 'i}'f der;,;�::�1-,s+,
on multi 1 `�'�''� t-.,=°�
,.,.,.r.,ry,r:• ,, e..,..un'it�:.stru`�ti�r.'es. :;;
>. ::i``nclzzi'ed�`:,<�. bi�r : �+o Vert- 'a �d ';'. ` ;
:'i
:4r -C J:
the e�nt r
e i-- =r.
t =' a Q ;tea"
''� � ,,-. �.... , h �.. oul'd 'b' r,f.,;,r.r.,::. f`
r• :.
, a' r•o " ::4>.<
• f PP• P "thief%r�t�i`ine�,to I' f�k,<`;;tie�::,;nortorum �_�.;�,�:;,`(;_�': r'" . ,,,
4,x
f h Y'If�.' r:.J,t
,
Y'n;7 �i r
•
3
;k'
The:•'m orito� • ine„ `'r':i: ';��'t
�e.:f. �'k`
,�, f �ct rt%nt
,,.tic; -:i!r..=' _ - '\ ,.t.
- r f.,,°:
.:r
an `dtc..
ie °.w 'e m h et he a�' 'ri;�rio�` w: s e,.
t'' h s�.'r 'or
PP
1 c ,
._,:,.:.. -'' tion., for:. ow ;
..� ,. : _. , d n zoni''i � of - :t
r, =cr;ta� �':�=,':;Jro' 'er'a' -�'idt:<,fiave:'.` f'::,a,
r.. .g`' ,p P Y';; the'�'inatte ..,:,,F•,.,
:Af,
>�y�° h eard:� b�'
'lt•
,Jti
d; H'e r ,,,_
ri :E Y's' mrie'r�.'''
obab'g. 1;
P.
:a t i A"::c. i.
- t
O ri T b
tt er''''o` era'
,1
Yr •,m' 'ii o h
l:
j'r y:
V.
,.r
c'"
i'.s •.f r'.
.:r L r:' b'
n er.
"Is
:"T
q�,i
°y,ii ,
..f'
.µ� 1,.
li�"-
ii s:�:
q'
l,r
his
6'
,,
F.i
,y 1
t -
•
«R'
J.:r,
.t 3
.7r
•,n's2'ii: -
] f
N',}:� •• :i`.'`` i�',M1:r"f: ',j,%",: ,tip"t tt �,r i.-f
Zf,;
.t V.F•,y,';;,. _ .'tl ; C .pie%'/, ''Y:: .:�,.
rt
yk,
•.r
• i
,.7.,
1#. � rr:;rlY
t. i•
5>': ,fit.,
i
ifs,?'"'; ,`,i •'•
C `I' {,Ff..
:!1,::`A;ii'. fir£.,,
£ t t
C _
'S:
i,2�A„,F,.
:j' n q
!" it'
f•-
.fw;^
r^s ' `�.: dr n
.�• 'd4.3t"r
:,:.'1!'f.r:wd'::,,?. . : .. ",r;.: ::h,i ': i rt' 'g.;.' r V ';t'<;.•.: yc'i`:'; _,.,: %r„ ',1;,';; ;;;,,;:%(.., ,,,,1',.\r„"t.r., Vr i.;
•,l, I p� `r,', j::,',4�:F;r `f� :!''.�.:"'t.``f'e y ,,A„�.i •'Y'1 n'ti%"�:,}. 'j 'S .pJ.
'tr`
L� W
ti
iiq
1
`:f
^f'
4
'i.
'sao:. . : ., . ,: ..�!;.by.•qyt:!�ni r. ^, `
•..S' r, '1�� ,r �r`,;,�;i 4.Y.r .r<'c.,, ..A, :,i,(, t„t,- iKr:,oi, ,.,
- 4Y'., gJ
t,.,;,: tiF,a
�f
't:
�yt° J;f,:
�ti.
S Y
'i t
a. ..:1„,
:'n+
^'t' ;'f':� �I r,�' t
r,fr.
r
any
'rim-:i, af+.:�' ;tt{;7 . -
IC�sy
rj4; '>r:: Y) P,
"'e.. r''T''r. trii�'d'ci'" a.
•,hr. L ' t ,�:
rN%'
F.s- "•''..''-{%t.,. :'fill, �'(' j�� + 'L:p?,
:dq
,},,n
,s,S,J!..r'.:.':!ter':„„ e.��^e
§ 7. a�; - is{, -
- f' z<:
.,:i ,V, yr:"'
_ t
t
:,E rs'''.. A
a a'tf,i•'��'t` :;5p;i.;,•.x t., .r' j:�; .t
��t
S, .,a r' c..
4ir1 :''i'', 7.
f?' .1'}!( .m ::.�. ',>' "r:;'� - :v),r� fi,
,'i�i ,r. ,zxry,
;is:;
{., of
fi,
t+'y;.. :It-i i
'!'l�`. 1.r t:Y ' F,.
: :
5 ��•'
r}.:iii:t.:
- :i r,.N-
1 / Y7 .4
a•„'•', ;4,; Y .:}:,: t n . ':, :.f:', 1i ,Y':•':',r.:' rS.
,rho' :i,' ::;:'- ,�..•
,us
1 a+5 tf!Jr
.�i
, �'f • ui�., frig _t
- • �:' .2 "',{si:;.}'l°'f S:e"• - ii`i 4:i,',` 'i:,;t^:�;i�,.,,,, :'f'.,..,
,.1
3n� ,1•" r
w�:� f:'
v+fi—
2<.
iJ:
.f
i s.. •it� ,7;
1'' .t Y.e..Wilk':,
fin,,;ti,.,
Y.'i 1d
t,.
ti.,
•:r
fir'•,i
• lr✓F
rut
Jt•
i:
,,yr.,r s 3� "eyr 1 x. • v
r.uy; ,
c.•t 'i" C
•t r
7,j:• .
Jul;'.,...
eerreLti
.17
J
•
Renton City Council
2/27/78 Page 7
Consent ,Agenda - Continued •
Surplus Vehicles City Clerk reports 2/23/78 bid,openin.g .for two surplus .vehicles
(copy attached). Letter.from 'P,urchasing Controller recommended
acceptance of high bid of-' $747 for the:'1969 Dodge Vehicle. A-88,
submitted' by L.' Gebenini .-, _' The letter recommended. rejection of the
one bid received .for Vehicle A-1.03 :and 'the Controller be given '
.permission to negotiate' the' sale:•:. Councilwoman Thorpe' requested
Vehicle.-A-103 not be soldor 1 e'ss ' than' $507 or returned to the
City pool . MOVED BY STREDICKE;, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL REFER THE
MATTER TO THE PURCHASING' CONTROLLER FOR DISPOSITION. CARRIED.-
MOVED BY :,PERRY,, -SECOND STREDI,CKE;. PERSONNEL'DIRECTOR FURNISH COUN-'
CIL WITH. REPORT ADVISING AS TO:WHEN PURCHASING CONTROLLER WAS AUTH-
ORIZED AND JOB: DESCRIPTION.' CARRIED.
King County Letter' from Valley General - Hospital presented revised agreement
Medical Services 'between King County and the. :Valley 'General Provider Group and the
'Paramedic • City of, Renton, Kent, Tukwila, ,Public Hospital District #1 (Valley
.General ' Hospital ), Fire Districts4.20, 25 and 40. The letter asked '
approval 'by the City. Council . of each of 'the districts, however, sig-
natures' have been omitted far.other than the Lead Agency or Valley
General Provider Group; noting', -if:the Fire Districts/Departments
want to be named in the contract- with the Lead Agency, it will be •
considered. . MOVED BY THORPE,. SECOND 'TRIMM, COUNCIL REFER AGREEMENT. -
TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE 'TO. REVIEW CONTRACT AND 'AMOUNT OF
DOLLARS STATED; AND MAKE .,RECOMMENDATION BACK TO COUNCIL. .CARRIED.
• CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS '
Latecomer Request Letter from Dean W. Bitney, Leisure. Estates, 201 Union Ave. SE,
Leisure Estates requested 10 year latecomers' 'agreenient for future sewer connections
into sewer system installed by B.itney Within Leisure Estates. The
letter outlined the area agree4 .upon in letter of 4/1/77 to the
Public Works Director. Moved by. Stredicke, Second Shane, Council
concur in request. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY, REFER
LETTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: CLYMER, PERRY,
THORPE, SHANE; 3-NO; 'STREDICKE,- SHINPOCH AND TRIMM. MOTION CARRIED.
Motion by Shane, Second by ,Stredi'cke, to, reconsider .the previous
motion, Failed.
LID #311 Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested Council initi-
Street Improvement ate by Resolution, forming a local improvement district on Jones
Jones Ave. NE at Ave. NE from NE 24th St. to a point 611 ft. north of NE 24th St.
NE 24th St. for the purpose of street improvements. on the east side of Jones
Ave. NE to include sidewalks , curb and gutters, stOrm drainage
and ,paving.. The letter explained recent development in the area
of two short plats with restrictive covenants providing that the
property owners would not protest creation of an LID. The letter
further recalled Mrs. Seegmiller and others having requested walking
paths on' this portion of Jones Ave. and the proposed improvements
would provide permanent facilities in response' to those requests.
MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN DEPARTMENT
REQUEST AND REFER TO THE WAYS. AND MEANS COMMITTEE. ' CARRIED.
Building Permit Letter from. Fred C. Callen, 958 •Sunset Blvd. NE, requested. clearance
/ for a building permit for a multiple unit structure on property
J located Lot 8 Block 5, Town of Renton. (Renton Hill ) . Upon inquiry
Os\ by Councilwoman Shinpoch, 'City Attorney Warren explained building
Imoratorium includes entire 'area of Renton Hill , whereas Comprehensive
Plan for Mill Ave. S. was not changed from multiple zoning. MOVED
k BY SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL REFER LETTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION
\AND CITY ATTORNEY FOR-.PROPER RESPONSE.
NEW BUSINESS Council President Clymer reported receipt of letter from the Renton
Management Association inviting the Council Members to attend an
Association sponsored seminar/workshop on Saturday, 3/18/78 to
review and exchange management ideas. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND
THORPE, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE INVITATION AS INFORMATION DISCUSSION.
CARRIED.
.--.. _--------
CALLEN REALTY
958 Sunset tilvd. N.E. /e 74 2-7 ( 17
`~ - - TwIT6 -,r'41'1 LE41 rsill. Renton, Wa. 98055 --
1.A,..i:' ' WsztO ft= M. 6-3011
CIVIL SEPVICE EMPLOYEES
IRISIMAN5CE
958 Sunset Blvd. N.E.
Renton, Washington 98055
February 23, 1978
• .
• .
The Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti , Mayor
Members of the City Council
Renton Municipal Building •
Renton, Washington 98055
Dear Mayor Delaurenti & Council Members:
I am hereby requesting clearance for a building permit for a
multiple unit structure on the property legally described as follows:
.
Lot 8 Block 5, Town of Renton, according to plat recorded in Volume
1 of Plats , Page 135, in King County Washington. (Renton Hill )
Respectfully,
• _,--Y-- e e.
Ae...."..___ . aze....6....,..<____ -
Filed C. Callen
. . .
•gcr."5 ,
• . /(4.:;.,:.!,,,,J(.,2_,
c.-
c, ,.... ..,
1•Nc. 1,--' ,. -,•,)kk. C r\,,
v ,- \ . t c,,
P °,0 ec° A-
. .
•. ,
r it Li Aft itt 4 q fr-
(IFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK )-
DATE:
The following items have been referred by the Renton City Council from
Council Meeting of
COUNCIL CQMMITTEE
COMMUNITY SERVICES MAYOR
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT CITY DEP ' T/DIVISION
PUBLIC SERVICES/AVIATION BOARD/COMMISSION
WAYS AND MEANS SPECIAL COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE OTHER
SUBJECT: )rttn rat-,,r17r•
'")*,T110 'or 1 t:iI “
COMMENTS : rrir‘v 1-r
•
ATTACHMENTS :
532 Cedar Avenue South Sr.
Renton, Washington 98055 �.
- January 16. 1978 ,s ;c'
•
RECEIVED
Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor JAN 17 19T8
Members of the Renton City Council • , ;,
Members of the Renton Planning Commission •
• • i
CITY OF RCP�iGN
• Renton City Hall MAYOR'S OFFICE
• 200 Mill Avenue South
. Renton, .Washington 98055 •
Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Commissioners:
This letter is •=to=tnotify •you-•o�f--the'-recent action • •
taken by the Renton Hill Community' Association. By
unanimous vote, the Renton Hill ,Cominunity Association
Board of Directors has authorized and encouraged our
• attorney, Bob McBeth, to petition the court for permission : ,
to intervene in the pending lawsuit the Transamerica
Corporation has filed against the- City. of• Renton. The
association and Mr. McBeth will take whatever steps are
• appropriate and necessary to assist:the :City' of ,Rento . \ 01 1 >1
PP
and defend the actions :the •city has taken -to encoura \L �/ .� 9�,,
responsible growth for Renton .Hill .as a. single• fami A�✓ �� ��
neighborhood. changing the city'§ Cj,11, C � iti
It. is our ..position that, •by g g
comprehensive-land •use plan to. single .family use . -D gei 's „„!V�� ,�',
•
designation on Cedar Avenue, the, citYlhasn a sonde '�- oFF� �� c_
to the demonstrated needs of the peop �. �F.
and unique family neighborhood .- the needs 'and concer
that have been presented in numerous public. he aringssion
and committee sessions with both the Planning •
and the City Council.
We thank you for youactions
�lesistsyou" in our
whateverneighborhood
and offer continuing support -, _ _ , • •
manner we can. � _
Sincerely,
. - . 44,t44:1 AL6b----/ . .
• Kathy Keolker, President
. Renton Hill Community
. .Association
c,....c..-_,L, a:a:1-",:-.-----1._..?„7. ,
CC ' j.7.e4-7,---(.-c--;;i •
•
/z __
-..-.. i ved' no second:;=im,n CnanP which rece . . .
-.0• `.fi.
•
R 3,::':
an City Council ;
_3/78 � Page :4 ' .
Jnsent Agenda .- Continued .
Consent Agenda,. • MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND• PER.RY, COUNCIL, CONCUR IN CONSENT AGENDA.
Approval CARRIED. - .
CORRESPONDENCE. AND CURRENT BUSINESS ' •
Fire, Station Bids Letter from Mayor Delaurenti •recommended .Counci1 acceptance of ,
the low bid for the Main. fi're'-Station, of John Maples (see attached - -
Architect Present tabulation). . The letter explained total cost of the project as '
Cichanski & Assoc: $906,70T'which is $94,555 'o'ver •budget. The letter recommended
• the additional money .be:'borrowed 'from .the .Street Forward Thrust Fund . - .
and a percentage of the•'Uti l i ty• Tax, be set aside in 1979 to repay- loan. '-•.,:-.,:
The letter • noted. meeting with the architect and Fire Station ,•- '')•
:• 1 Advisory Committee. 'MOVED, BY CLYMER, 'SECOND 'THORPE, COUNCIL REFER .
THE MATTER TO THE WAYS :AND MEANS COMMITTEE. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND .:•,_•
CLYMER; AMEND MOTION• TO.`,INdLUDE- PUBLIC 'SAFETY COMMITTEE REI=ERRAL . • '
• 1 • MOTION CARRIED, MOTION`:'`;"AS ;AMENDED'CARRIED,;• • ,7f, ,
Renton Hill and Letter from Kathy Keoiker;, _p•residen;t•of the Renton Hill Community
Transamerica , Association, notified Council +of the unanimous decision of the
Court Case - , Renton Hill Community. Association and :Board of Directors to author-
i zed and ,encouraged ,thei;r,.attorney,•Bob McBeth; to petition the court'
. - for. permission to i nte:rvene' in the••pe.pdi ng lawsuit which the Trans-
. , america . Corpor.ation has''fi'Ied 'against-'the City. ' -The letter ex-
plained the association and Mr McBeth would assist the City and
• defend the:'City's : actions• in changing the City's Comprehensive
•Plan to single-family--u's'e'desrgnati.on-:"on Cedar Ave.- S. MOVED BY -
. , PERRY, SECOND THORPE; COUNCIL REFER,,�h�HE' MATTER.TO THE CITY ATTORNEY',
FOR AD.VICE'TO COUNCIL,',`CARRIED •• '.• .
' Council Agenda ' Coun.ci loom-Clymer presented-A letter from Washington Natura l Gas
Scheduling Co. received,-after the'--clos-i'ng .of agenda scheduling. Clymer Moved,
Thursday Noon :;"'; '. seconded by Shinpoch; •that _the matter.;be:referred to the Ways and . '• ;;
•
Deadline • • Means Committee a's ac-tibn 'was, needed'.by-'the time of the next Council • .'• •,.'`l�
Upheld - - meeting:. ' SUBSTITUTE-MOTION BY, THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE, THE LETTER•.• •,,, ,.`T
Y',• , '' 'BE PLACED ON'THE= REGULAR'AGENDA FOR THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING ON „'''''•;,
.• '-, FEBRUARY 6; 1978. .ROLL, CALL 4''.AYE ,TRIMM, STREDICKE, THORPE, _-•`;t;
- . ' . {- . ,-PERRY; .. 3-NO:: .CLYMER,,-SHANE, 'SHINPOCH...-:'.`MOTION• CARRIED. `-
:
NEW BUSINESS- i. ';• • MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND!PERRY, COUNCIL'-•REFER •THE MATTER OF POLICE - ' .
Police, Escort,;' ; :_ ESCORT SERVICE FOR ALL':-FUNERALS.TO'•THE4 COUNCILL-'S. PUBLIC SAFETY �';,:�.,.
. - COMMITTEE: -CARRIED. , . , '.. ' ,'."_*_.' .:• ;. ', . . 1,i ;', ,
Traffic Signals- MOVED BY •:SHANE, SECOND-STREDICKE, 'COUNCIL REFER TO THE TRANSPORTATION ''..: '.,•"..
COMMITTEE 'THE SUBJECT- .MATTER; THAT FOLLOWING TRAFFIC SIGNALS BE ` ;;:;',
' OPERATED ON CAUTION EXCEPt•DURING THE-PEAK WORKDAY HOURS OF 7:00 to •- ,`'y ,
• 8:30 a.m. AND .4:00 to 5:30 p',m. : THIRD AND FOURTH AVES.N. AT FACTORY,''. ; :'•::
WILLIAMS N. ; GARDEN N: "'AND'BRONSON,WAY. ROLL' CALL: 5 AYE: TRIMM,: _•'•.••'''
' " SHANE, STREDICKE; THORPE;: 'PERRY;''',2•,NO':'.;CLYMER. AND SHINPOCH:
MOTION CARRIED. '
Speed Limit . Councilman Shane asked,that the speed :limit be raised from 35 mph , - ..••
to •40/45 mph on •the Maple -V,a1 ley'High ay,- Cemetery Road (NE 4th St. ),, .j ; :I.';',.';-
'• Lake Washington ,Boulevard. and• Sunset •Boulevard..' Moved by Stredickee;•.• , •"''
- Second Shane; council •:refer',the matter' to. the Administration to ' :- ;: .:
check speed limit on these streets •and report' back. ROLL CALL: ,•, ,:•',:..
3-AYE: SHANE, STREDICKE, THORPE; -4-N0:-:•CLYMER, TRIMM, SHINPOCH AND . .,,;';';-.',
PERRY. MOTION FAILED.„,.'• , - • - •
Councilman Shane _. Proposed motions by Counci'I man Shane;which received no second: AI I .' ` <'.•:;
. City employees be given-eight months '.to 1 i ve within the City. All •
;^4 ��,,: •
. . ', •• •City employees will' be�given. 'same-Wage, 'increase and. benefits given', ,>' .a L,
,. . ' : to Police and •Fire,-personnel - M`"•-•4y'
Executive Session MOVED BY CLYMER,: SECOiit 'PERRY,'''COUNCIL MEE�T.'•IN EXECUTIVE SESSION -RE'-`'' .-`••',:-,-;,-,A,..
Executive
• • LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. 'CARRIED::.;Members of-the audience and staff not -.''-, •,4�;
involved were requested' to"-leave the,--Chambers, at 10:50 p.m. COUNCIL- . ;.r''�•
ADJOURNMENT MEETING ADJOURNED AT, 11;:25. .m. • • %r_ r rr=
.y Y y
. _ eTores A..'Mead;:�Cit Clerk, '.�� Y�Y t,'":•�
.I (//j•� - r _'ems .._ .-.� i - � , G y -... _v, i_..pl,._..•'--,•
/L.l
•
Rentdn City Council
12/19/77 Page 3
Correspondence and Current Business - Continued
Rezone Appeal $110 fee plus S25 appeal fee. MOTION CARRIED adopting committee recom-
Ray Ball mendations. Thorpe asked her NO voice vote be recorded.
Leslie Adams Letter from Acting City Attorney Warren advised he appeared in
Court Case #828227 Superior Court on 12/8/77 to argue the Writ of Certiorari on the
McLaughlin Rezone McLaughlin Rezone filed by Leslie Adams , et ux vs' City of Renton.
Appeal R 001-77 The letter explained Judge' s decision that the City' s actions were
not arbitrary and capricious and therefore dismissed the Writ.
Copy of trial brief and pertinent documents included_ Information
Traffic Signals - Letter f.-om Carl Wyatt 'resident of the Renton Shopping Center, Inc. ,
Renton Shopping Merchant' s Association, called attention to several restrictive and
Center unsafe features in the traffic signal control system adjacent to
the Center. (1 ) intersection of Rainier Ave. S. and S. 3rd. ; lengthen-
ing of left turn signal time and east-west walk signal time requested.
(2) Intersection of Sunset Blvd. , Langston Rd. , and Hardie St. ; re-
quested lengthing of time for both left turn signal and north-south
walk sigeai , (3) Intersection of Rainier Ave. S . and S . 4th Pl . ;
requested construction of a left turn storage lane for northbound
traffic on Rainier Ave- S. to allow left turn into Center. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINIS-
TRATION FOR RECOMMENDATION BACK TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE.
Human Rights Letter f: o:;: Albert Thiliey , Chairperson of the Renton Human Rights
Ordinance and Affairs Commission; submitted an ordinance amending Title II ,
Chapter 10 of the City Code setting forth duties and procedures of
the Human Rights and Affairs Commission. The letter explained the
two public hearings held by the commission , ordinance having been
drafted with assistance of former City Attorney Sheiian and City
Attorney War_r..en . The letter noted the Wahirr:Iton :;; ate Human Rights
Commission ,and attorney have determined it is satisfactory to provide
for inter-agency cooperation in the processing of complaints. Refer-
ral to the Ways and Means . Committee recommended. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM-
. MITTEE . CARRIED. .�
Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Richard Geissler to the
Fire Chief permanent position of Fire Chief for the City effective 1/1/78,
asking confirmation by the City Council . The letter noted successful
completion of the six-month probationary period by Chief Geissler as
of 1/1/78. MOVED BY BRUCE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPOINT-
MENT. CARRIED.
Motion by Stredicke, second by Shinpoch, for recess , Failed.
OLD BUSINESS
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted committee
Development report recommending that the Council refer the matter of the zoning
Committee Report on Renton Hill to the Planning• Department to review the Comprehen-
Renton Hill sive Plan changes recently Massed by the Council and the zoning of
Zoning the Renton Hill area to determine those parcels of land bearing
different zoning classifications than those permissible in the •
amended Comprehensive Plan. The report noted the Planning Dept.
would then initiate rezoning requests where parcels do not conform
with proposed uses of the amended plan and would prepare the necessary
reports ; the. Hearing Examiner to determine, after a public hearing,
whether or not the parcels identified by the Planning Department should
be rezoned.. MOVED BY PERRY , SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT C )MMI T I Er. . Upon inquiry
by Councilwoman Thorpe on areas where application had been made
• prior to the moratorium, Acting City Attorney Warren advised of prior
,vested rights. MOTION CARRIED.
South Renton The committee report recommended Council concurrence in the Planning
Comprehensive Commission recommendations for South Renton Comprehensive Planning
Plan Area Area subject to the follow: (1 ) Designate a lineal greenbelt area
along west side of proposed SR 515 extending southerly from S 27th
St. to SE 172nd St. ; (2) Include buffer of low density multi-family
' . RENTON CITY COUNCIL
•. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE •
. COMMITTEE REPORT
. December 19, 1977
RE: SOUTH RENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA
The Planning and Development Committee has completed its study regarding the
above referral and recommends Council .concurrence in the Planning Commission
recommendations subject to the following and referral to the Ways & Means Committee:
(1) Designate a lineal greenbelt area along the west side of the proposed . •
S.R. 515 extending southerly from South 27th Street to S.E. 172nd Street.
.' (2) Include a buffer of Low Density Multi-family Residential south of
S.E. 172nd Street between the Single Family Residential and Medium
;� Density Multi-family Residential.
,4
(3) Shift the proposed north-south residential collector street to the
•
west to abutt the proposed park site.
(4) Designate the area south of Carr Road east of the existing city limits
as Public Quasi-public and Medium Density Multi-family Residential.
Designate steep slope areas as a greenbelt buffer area. '
RE: REFERRAL OF ZONING FOR RENTON HILL
The Planning and Development Committee has completed its study regarding the .
above referral and recommends that the City Council refer the matter of the
zoning on Renton Hill to the Planning Department.
The Planning Department will review the Comprehensive Plan changes recently
passed by the Council and the zoning of the Renton Hill area in order to deter-
' mine those parcels of land on Renton Hill bearing different zoning classifica-
dons than those permissible in the amended Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning Department .will then initiate rezoning requests where parcels ' •
do not conform with proposed uses of the amended Comprehensive Plan and prepare
the necessary Planning Department reports.
The Hearing Examiner will determine, after a public hearing, whether or not
the parcels identified by the Planning Department should be rezoned. •
/� 9 `�'� 2 ,,,,✓fir Cal J ,
ctxot.c4)cki.t
or Perr-r-j Chairman ( I Barbaar`W`BarbaraShin och Member
i 1 6
sII
-
-I� h Stredicke, Member .
r`l / ,
/( � , /U�:mot=-(1 ��/ 1 � •
�iA�^� i .�'.-ra-.,(�9 'C �•b /L._l� ^. 1.✓/� ��l/ im^
Cam' ~'' - !/ T F/v� u'ed_e �21��-11 f'_ LG C t i�-�'C� c�-L r 2--e-149
Renton City Council t/
12/5/77 Page 5
Old Business - Continued
Repainting 3/4 MG Highlands Elevated Tank and the 3 MG Mt. Olivet Reservoir.
Bid Approved Public Works Director Gonnason advised approval interpreted and
bid awarded , .Attorney°` ndicati'ng procedure legal .
Seminar Councilwoman Thorpe called attention to Surface Water, Green River
Basin, Seminar in Auburn 12/14/77, asking Planning Director be
notified. Mayor Delaurenti noted he will be participating on the
panel .
Christmas Councilman Stredicke complimented Mayor and Staff on working with
Decorations Downtown Merchants on Christmas lighting change over. The Mayor
noted attempt will be made for television coverage.
Public Services Public Services Committee Chairman Bruce submitted committee report
Committee Report noted review ,pof Brad McElroy request to connect to the City's
sewer system and noted McElroy nas executed a covenant to annex
and is included in the proposed Lozetti annexation for which peti-
tions are being prepared for circulation. The committee recom-
mended application be approved subject to limitation of single
lateral for single family unit and access to the property be
limited to a single driveway. The report also recommended notifi-
cation of adjacent property owners as to the proposal . MOVED BY
BRUCE, SECOND SHINPOCH, Council concur in the 'committee report.
ROLL CALL VOTE: 2-AYES: SHINPOCH AND BRUCE; 5-NO's : PERRY, THORPE,
STREDICKE, TRIMM AND CLYMER. MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND PERRY, CITY CLERK BE- AUTHORIZED TO NOTIFY McELROY ASKING
FOR ANNEXATION PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO SEWER SERVICE. CARRIED.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, NO FURTHER CONNECTIONS OUTSIDE .THE
CITY FOR SEWER SERVICE BE ENTERTAINED UNLESS THERE IS EXTREME,
CERTIFIED HEALTH HAZARD.* Councilwoman Thorpe noted this applies
to existing structures , no new construction being allowed to con-
Sewer Connections nect. Upon inquiry by Councilman Trimm, Public Works Director
to Property Out- Gonnason noted previously adopted resolution clarifying those
Side City Limits properties adjacent to sewer line in City would be allowed to con-
Disallowed Unless nect upon findings of health hazard; these last few items before
Extreme Health the Council requiring extension of lines in order to connect.
Hazard Gonnason asked that resolution be rescinded if policy changed.
Gonnason noted need for septic tanks for new construction in event
of change of policy, noting late comer' s-agreement paid in event
of connections in the past. Councilman Clymer disapproved of
septic tanks . *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE,
COUNCIL REFER SUBJECT MATTER TO THE _WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.
CARRIED.
Elk Ridge Drive The Public Services Committee report recommended denial of request
Name 'Change to change the name of Eagle Ridge Drive to Elk Ridge Drive, suggest-
Denied ing alternate proposal to deed the entry way of the Elks Club to
the City to name " Elk Ridge Drive"or pursue other similar approach
for better identity. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
City Hall The committee report noted review of the Public Works Department
Heating System request for modification to the City Hall heating system and
Modifications installation of the Vertrex Energy Manager system; the Mayor' s
Approved Committee on Energy Conservation also reviewed the proposal and '
recommended favorably. The committee report recommended Council
concurrence in the modifications and installation and that the
matter. be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for appropria-
tion of funds within the limitations of the existing budget.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Perry noted review of Council procedure ordinance and
Council Procedures asked that each Council Members , the Mayor and City Clerk review
the ordinance also; requesting adherence to the rules .
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ordinance #3186 The Ways and Means Committee Chairman, Earl Clymer, presented com-
Renton Hill mittee report recommending second and final readings of an ordinance
Comprehensive Plan amending the City' s Comprehensive Land Use Plan of Renton Hill area.
t_-
Renton City Council
12/5/77 Page 6
Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued
Ordinance #3186 First reading of the ordinance was 11/28/77. City Clerk Mead
Continued the ordinance designating area as single-family and multi-family
Renton Hill residential , greenbelt and recreational ; also deleting Mill Ave. S
Comprehensive extension and Grant Ave. S. as being impractical and inappropriate.
Plan Following readings , it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES except Councilman
Bruce was not present during the Roll Call . MOTION CARRIED.
Resolution #2150 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended reading and adop-
Housing & tion of the following resolutions : Resolution was read adopting
Community the 1978 Housing and Community Development Program; Public Hearings
Development held 11/28/77 and 12/5/77. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL
Block Grants ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #2151 Resolution was read allowing Teleprompter to merge its subsidiary
Teleprompter TV companies under the name of Northwest Cablevision. MOVED BY
Merger CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #2152 Resolution was read extending the Renton Hill building moratorium
Moratorium on multi-family residences for a period of 90 days. MOVED BY
Renton Hill Area CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.
Councilman Stredicke requested that the Administration look
at the access problems on Renton Hill ; Mayor Delaurenti assigned
Public Works Director. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance #3187 MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECONSIDER ACTION TAKEN
Garbage Collection 11 /28/77 CONCERNING THE GARGABE ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Following
Rate Increase readings of the ordinance, MOVED. BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL
First Reading of ADOPT ORDINANCE. * Councilwoman Thorpe requested Administration
Ordinance 11/21 include information to residential users with billing - how to
obtain one can rate. Councilman Perry requested for the record,
percentage of increase, explaining garbage franchise stipulation
that the contract would be open for renegotiation if rates increase
above 20-30% in five-year period. Gonnason explained rate increase
due to increase in County dump fees - one can 4. 1% increase; 2 can
5.6% increase; additional cans 12% increase (within 25 ft. ) .
Gonnason ended list with 2-yard container, 22%. Councilman
Stredicke requested report listing increases for various industrial
concerns 1975-78. Gonnason explained cost-of-living clause in
contract for drivers , which may mean increase in costs within six
months . Councilwoman Shinpoch asked the alternatives to one-bidder
award situation. Councilwoman Thorpe noted recycling studies.
ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: THORPE, SHINPOCH BRUCE AND CLYMER; 2-NO: PERRY
AND STREDICKE; 1-ABSTAIN DUE TO INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION: TRIMM.
*MOTION CARRIED. Stredicke encouraged recycling, outlining processes.
Executive Session MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL MEET IN EXECUTIVE SESSION
FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING WAGE NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Council
President Perry requested audience and Staff Members leave the
Chambers. Time: 10:30 p.m. Council convened at 10:48 p.m. All
Council Members present at Roll Call .
Greetings Councilwoman Thorpe extended Happy Hanukkah greetings, asking
to be noted in the record.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL ADJOURN THE MEETING.
CARRIED. Time: 10:50 p.m.
aliete,& Q
Delores A. Mead, City Clerk
Svc- Z or3 M _
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON .
RESOLUTION NO. 2152
WHEREAS. the Planning Commission of. the City of Renton has
recently recommended changes to the Comprehensive Plan within certain
areas of the City, and
WHEREAS such review and recommendations include an area
in the City generally known as"Renton Hill" as hereinafter more
particularly described, and`.
WHEREAS it has been determined by the City Council and
the Planning Commission that serious problems may result in said area
if unlimited construction were permitted for any multiple dwelling,
commercial or industrial purposes, due to insufficient and inadequate
street access , circuity traffic pattern, means of ingress and egress ,
and such existing problems may seriously affect the public health,
safety and well being of the community, and in particular the
residents within the hereinbelow described area, and
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Renton has passed
an Ordinance changing'.the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for said Renton
Hill, and
WHEREAS the City Council has referred the subject of .
zoning on Renton Hill to the Planning and Development Committee and
to the Land Use Hearing Examiner, and=
WHEREAS it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City
to establish a moratorium on certain construction pending completion
of the present studies and reviews , including public hearings thereon,
NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON, DO
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS ;
SECTION I ; The above statements and recitals are hereby
found to be true and correct in all respects .
•
SECTION II : In furtherance of public health , safety and,
general welfare , there is hereby declared a moratorium for the
construction, improvement and alteration of any multiple apartment
buildings , commercial and industrial facilities of every type and. "I
nature , for a period of ninety ( 90) days from date hereof, and
relating to the following described territory:
All that portion of the SW l/4 of Section 17 , Twp
23 N. , Range 5 E,W,M„ lying east of FAI 405 and
south of Chicago—St. Paul Milwaukee and Pacific
Railroad. Together with all that portion of the
NW l/4 of Sec . 20 Twp. 23 N„ Range 5 E ,W,M, ,
lying East of FAI 405 and North of the PUget Sound
Power and LIght Company transmission line easement,
In the event that the study and review of the City ' s zoning on
said Renton Hill has not been completed within said ninety ( 90)
day period, then this Ordinance shall be renewed, without further
action of the City Council, for an additional period of sixty ( 60)
days . •
The aforespecified moratorium shall not apply to
existing apartments , single family or duplex dwellings or the renovation,
repair or maintenance of same ,
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 5th day of December, 1977 .
• --
Delores A. Mead, Ci Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 5th day of December, 1977 ,
/
Charles`' F, Delaurenti, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J, Wa42'en, Acting City Attorney
Renton City Council
11/28/77 Page 5
Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued
Garbage Rate COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 3-AYES: CLYMER,
Ordinance STREDICKE, THORPE; 2-NO'S: PERRY AND SHINPOCH. According to
Continued statute, majority vote of Council membership is required to
pass an ordance into' law. MOTION FAILED. Ordinance returned to
the Ways and Means Committee for one week.
Renton Hill The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading and referral
Comprehensive Plan back to committee of the following ordinances:
Ordinance An ordinance was presented amending the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Plan, Maps and data relating to Renton Hill vicinity. Follow-
ing reading, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER
ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Limited G.O. Bonds An ordinance was presented providing for the issuance and sale of
Senior Center $900,000 par value "Limited General Obligation Bonds, 1978"
providing a part of funds for cost of land acquisition and con-
struction of a Senior Citizens Center and appurtenances. Follow-
ing reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL
REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Substitute
motion by Thorpe, to advance the ordinance to second and final
readings, failed for lack of a second. Councilwoman Seymour-
Thorpe then stated for the record, Council has been advised
that interest rates will not be declining , but increasing, that
early adoption would mean lower interest; also that public has ex-
pressed opinions at committee and council meetings , that the only
objections received were from people outside the City limits and
urged Council action. MOTION CARRIED returning ordinance to the
Ways and Means Committee.
Resolution #2149 The Ways and Means Committee recommended reading and adoption of
Final Plat a resolution, which approved MacPherson' s Inc. , Ruddell 's 2nd
Ruddell ' s 2nd Addn. Addition final plat FP-087-77; property located at the Northeast
corner of Monroe Ave. N.E. and N.E. 10th St. Following reading,
it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION
AS READ. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd.S. , inquired regarding bonds for
the Senior Citizen Center, being advised by Councilman Clymer
that general obligation bonds are voted by citizens for property
Senior Center Bonds tax, however, that councilmanic or limited general obligation
bonds which were before the Council tonight and will be presented
next week, are paid from the City's general revenue and are
presented to the Council for approval .
Rolling Hills Jim McClelland, 1922 Jones Ct. S.E. , representing Rolling Hills
Moratorium Homeowners Assoc. inquired re committee discussion of moratorium,
being advised by Committee Chairman Perry of the schedule. (Attached)
1978 Budget Charles Shane, 3003 Mt. View N. , made .inquiries of the 1978 budget
and asked that B & 0 tax be adopted.
Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SES-
SION IN THE 6TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. CARRIED. The Council
Members left the Chambers at 10:10 p.m. and returned at 11 :00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: All Members present as previously shown. Motion by
Stredicke, Second Shinpoch, to adjourn the meeting, failed.
MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND NOT
OBSERVE 11 :00 p.m. CLOSING RULE. CARRIED.
Council Position Councilman Perry expressed disappointment that newly elected Coun-
Filled cilman Thomas Trimm was unable to attend meeting for swearing in;
Thomas Trimm inquiring concerning any date requirement for certification. Moved
by Stredicke, Second Thorpe, continue meeting to next week. SUB-
STITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL APPOINT THOMAS
TRIMM TO FILL VACANT COUNCIL POSITION, FORMERLY HELD BY WILLIAM
GRAN. CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.
11 :13 p.m. odaget4d) a.
Delores A. Mead, City Clerk
EXP11I 26 CITY OF RENTON
WARRANT DISTRIBUTION 11/28/77
FUND TOTAL WARRANTS
MACHINE VOIDS: NO.# 15999 — #16002
CURRENT FUND 627,651068
PARKS AND RECREATION FUND 116,751069
ARTERIAL STREET FUND $117072
DTREET FUND 6'190952091
LIBRARY FUND S3300
STRUT FORWARD THRUST 01748679072
MAIN F IRE STATION CONSTR. :/ EDA 0229622
CEDAR RIVER TRAIL SYSTEM / EDA F11.419881
WATERWORKS UTILITIY FUND. s660176027
AIRPORT FUND $685096
1976 WATER & SEWER CONSTR 81,860 29
EQUIPMENT RENTAL $20196188
FIREMEN PENSION 815,44
TOTAL OF ALL WARRANTS $311,5311001
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OF THE
RENTON CITY COUNCIL, HAVING RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION THAT
MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES WAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY
APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO, 16003 THROUGH NOS 16098 IN THE AMOUNT
OF F311,531 .01, TM S 28TW DAY OF NOVEMBER 1977.
COMMITTE
E E CHAIRMAy MEMBER re or is
IDISER ,a,c2
L. I .D.# 302 M
REVENUE WARRANT NO.#R-8 $8,100.00
CASH WARRANT NO.#C-10 $8, 100.00
CI1Y OF RUOON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE /S HEREBY GIVEN that. the W3iton City Council has fixed the 24s1,_
day of November977 dt 8:00 p.m, in the Council Chicbbers uf
the Renton Municipal Buiidinv, Reton, Washington, as the time and plce
for a public hearing to consider the following:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UNTON HILL PLANNING AREA (THAT AEA GENERALLY
BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSiDE
AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON
THE SOUTH)
SEE ATTACHED MAP
Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to %mice aporuval ,
disapproval or opinions on sam .
CATY OF RUNTON
141#teqL117., 142421"
Delores A. Mead ,
City Clerk
DATE OF PUBLICATION
October 21 , 1977
..- ',..._,.."
" .• • , .
. , . 1 / Il I '' . • ' 4‘,,
. ,
- ,
• I---- -- ----I,
- 1
' ...-1 • '• \
d , ,
• , .
.. Z ' : • /
• - . 1.0 •
... ,.., .
•/ •
.... .',
INNN
, '.•‘:
• .
0 •.,„
• ....) -
, '''. " ' • ... ).
. t 1.(/., .
• --
0 - , . ;'. • it ,....>• 7 2.•. ..,:y1 „_...- -
/• ...
a a •- : .:_- ,,,, 4-
121, ,... ..,.. . , _
-/ ..--.--•---- -,... .. ------ .'
-... • , ,.
-,.... ....,
.," • .r:. . _.;,_, ' l>"...-./".. 7,/,'
1 • ..
:,..... •.
• , 1.3,-.v 73.50, • -. f.'I .
•. ' 1,.•::4• ..(.-:
.
--J.,. , , r_,-,..}....:- a. ,,..• . . 1
1. %-.
'''.-••a•u•-,7, •"..04,..., .i' ,• 7 t.rs.fl_e).„.1 .0,1,7.• . ;/ • • .&--- •3711.A. Ov• .., ..... .... :
ts
C .-.;--. 3-11 1 -I . • ... • il r•- -
.'
. ._ .
,. ..,•'",., ..,
• e.... ,.
. • - I- '
,•,.4/ -. __ ,
-,• ,
r---..,,i- • • '44,,.„,„_ „40, • ./...1 , i...,
' / N
\ . . •
O L._
l‘ tt.s>.../ •,'•
' ,1.7••••../ : .
-..--.',.. ------11-7----- 7-•..,,,_ --'-'*... , •., '„,./ a. -1 a „ • ---T-
....,, -..z..;-„,„ -------.••••'•••47,,,,, 1, / a.y , / 0 0 0
••.. . .,
, - cc or : 1 : // : :.".4-2 •J. :•!....„;-_, .. I ...: ! • , - ,
4. -4. :••••- • l , • t ' •-,-. •
.1. • ;., • ... -........,. 'V• ::' .. ..' . .„ < i
_ . i
;: C. !!"-.....; • ••••••.„ N.'••••• . ',.4*.., • . 2 ,.••.'- . . ... ... .---.••• , . ... -
0 1.-I I; le'• -•1•.-- ••••., ,, •,, •....• /
.. ,. • ' ••.'N 1
,
• i• s 2 4 . ' .,
. ; 1
, .
.,ier. J. . ..... ,
• - t J : r .:' s 4 . -P
/ . . - •
;-5-• .---- --Z ,-,---. ---..- --r- • r •L
.N...' • .I
• :1 3 . 3 ' 7.- , :. - 3 t. -a '
! , .
...---
I.
ArdniPillOW•4111.11 M4 d'-'.ir..legialVdffi. FiEreell, 7.'""Ls..-_,................. ., . _
,‘.- 4::'' ,....---...-..--....--L-----aj ,_.".7.7..:--7.__•-•=t__---7!.;. _: .-_:,. -_i....
.:' :I,I'---.?rtr---- "..--;'-.-.-.--7."--. ---.--'..... I • "..l..•..•....-,.m,.....:ei;...0--*p.1o,0ap1.1;n-I.-;4.w:1,p..tw....-a.-I'si:.i-.N.-..q.;.,11:M....I.-4,Ln43_,...4;."..;-'-.,;I O o'-PLrRoivi.e-lrwa1.f..--tr-.--ir..,z; ut-,-kr. -• '.4s.''''Le , ___-.-_,".___S__-_-2-1- -- - -- --;,...!-'-
•, _.s r_":'.'....t»i Ct.,,.i'..., :.s•. •.IZ.. :.•F.7•.b rt,,e.- ... ' L
.
-1-. '3 • .. - 3--C,.-•.5• 3-- T !• - 4- •
, .. .
''.A-
> \ -. • . ; ' :. 1 t .'' -?, : , r I • I I, 0 c •• • •: t. !•-.,--../......i.fia,•.2,1•! .-erillfflati-,1121.4.41r. ...ty.,m_itar_l. _r -..- 4. •_ ' L.: •.. • , ! . d ,
-•.;ca.,-• ---.; :."---7-7-_ -S.__. 7 7,7ri-,,. -,„ .::jr----:_-':_.TV. __:-:-. --: - . - ' - ' .
•T
',...•7-.2s , .4 Q. i,:r,'? ‘ " 1 ,---' •-i• : : ' el ' I : • -.II - ,
, I' •- '''''•-I- ..• --.--• "
,.8 I,-,!1••:.', i., , -3 •..i • S`0 .e. .i
... --:....._..,_ ,_,.1•',...„,.- -----'...•'-----
ARC 1 t pa 1•,. . '4 .. f I . IT •.4 %.c. 9-
,
-g.".31.1s-.4rtn-,-...- dail...1 in."'AL...,.... ...,:?...r..12-„,-.,...man_s'.-, .d." /• • s . _. ,,.,,,,,, „,-.--...- ,,,,,„..„.„...,;.. , -. ,,.
-.;a 4 a-T,.1 k.1,'-:-14•'17--,10-...471-.-4-.1,_-4-_..P C.1-.1.:.',141.4j:'
k.I 7g-,kit. 0--..4
1.- .tf--.o-t-Te.. ....--3-4-1----5-j-•-7,.,.-7. -1A • <s . .5.
--.,.-.t e
-44 / ,, ' ‘: -7. . t.:.r.: I,‘,:It-... ---7,,, i • -\Q`....
-,....
••
.-- -•-c A,: •.iv.,4:r -44 14.:.-4i.•:::.4-: -.-..z.,...N..- -.• . , / ,-...161...&-"•• ?:"„..:_:-.:__;44-- -... v--,a.-.:-- - •- - •- . ,
"\\C.
.....b.-..........i,r. .. .. . -
54 s lnv ______. ... ..
---•
n. •,r • • •' -' -•. ,0-.:'S .7.•"3-..... ';'-.. " . -_ .
• f '
•v.r4-1 o-..1-2 4._ l' ::=1-4•344-i .-.7.... -"- • - 40 4 i' .4 . ___...,,.T.,3 „....:4,AEL._._ ./_, ..- . : ... .1 . -, --'
/
i_. '''..-''' ''.-.4V.--- /.. 4V, .--. i.I_... .•• -- .. • '. - ")- • ,
• .. " - - .,
,
Ir..- /6, • • ' ....„. 1 , . _......--
•114;148 4 .,..1Z--: t ' .1-.. . i i', • t -- .
...„
.. . --.
-4.7.,-..a..,a...-• -,-,..,..,,,:r-..: ' - / ;,,,",A7- •--:--- ••- ` •t• ,, ,---.;Z---. •-•- ttir... ---- .,-.;. ..7- : Sr- -- --c 6. --.
„ - .., , 1.. - ''''',..-_,C:.---- -
- .
./. ../- „ , • . . ._. . . , I .
7'.,
9 .,
. -,••- ... 7tns.,:gte.X.....• , ..,. • Z
._7 N 0 s i? , . \.• .,:__
• -
.\,......\,. . 0 ,. '' - • -
,_1, • -
__,...t.x..-.1-_,..1.1.• _.-. _,
• .-z.___......_
, . ..
• ;-........,:
INIIIII ' IMI. - 10r .0•00 . _•' .-a-!_,..i...:,.. ,..:- -
•.:air .r...,. - s ,,,,,, .....- ,.. -4
_-.•••
van. '• .-' .,2 re-.1 ..'' •I-.1. -. . , _,__ , ,..- „Lr----:--.3.7:,:. ‘‘:-.'..43--"-.142:-3??..1.5. 7:71',..-_-304•-,,,-1--.. - . -
..r :.... 1 '.. :"...7-•-.. N2:---,--'•-. ...^.' V • - 1--':1741-7--------: - .i----'-', ------::-.2;.,..•::----;----;::
-
• ?:. - ''" ''-s. 1. N'77 -"••'' 7
. - . , •- • • -
4-.... ,-- -
L-rkiiPgigr•F- • ‘; ' , ..
3:21.... . .. _ _. --''"-""---' ,'-•••7- • ,,,-.-- 't.....!..:i.v.: : _ --_ ,,,,„ z-,...,,-,,,,i........._ .1......,.....„....,_
/
•-•
,...- ./.•
..1.--: -
--7. ..'':2...,.:'• IfT-•1 -;-...-11-.1 .1 4.
-I-. ,••-f...!.. -in', .0 ,.. r.••••
-
1 -.i.•0.-•.......,;•-• ..-- .5 :.an.%1-..7...9.1'31; -.\-4.. ........... -.1 -,,„ ,j. "'
\ . ••- ' - "i•-,7‘,"It'Ll:A.- - -- 1 •.-, ..4C•..- •
..„.%,.., .1. . --4".“0 . "5.b,&ors. - • i,:er*-ir--.7-•
::,....-:.Z.
.-5_,N--0 . • 2 2. .. . •• - - -2 - - - • - _r
••-• - . ,
-2. - • •-•
:''Nek-, •4.A : -: -••••••:.-..•...1..-...-4 .•,..:--std.-,•.... \• ;---•A-_.•,- a. .•''':-•-
-' .it.l. I- . . .
. , • ..-Tur. f,,..‘ ' . - .: -
1 •, • 7,- -.... ; "- --'-....i.;,4,•: -I- -...,.•• .. . - 4' 4. ,'- -. - ' " nr'S e. 4...l-tfi... -
• .
' : _ -
-%
'CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2137
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Renton, together
with its committees , has been and is now studying and reviewing proposed
. J amendments to the City' s Comprehensive Plan within certain areas of
. the City , and
WHEREAS such study and review also includes an area in the City
generally known .as"Renton Hill" , as hereinafter more particularly
described, and
WHEREAS it has been determined, On a preliminary basis , :that
serious problems may result in said area if unlimited; construction
were permitted for any. multiple dwelling, , commercial or industrial
purposes , due to insufficient and inadequate street access , circuity •
traffic pattern, means of ingress and egress ,and such existing problems
may seriously affect the .public health , safety and well being of the
community , and in particular the residents within the hereinbelow
described area, and
WHEREAS it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City to
establish a moratorium on certain construction pending completion of
the present studies and reviews , including public hearings thereon,
NOW THEREFORE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO RESOLVE .
AS FOLLOWS : , . • .
SECTION I : The above statements and recitals are hereby found
,/ to be true and correct in every. respect.
SECTION II : In furtherance of the public health , safety and
general welfare , there is hereby declared a moratorium for the
construction, improvement - and alteration of any multiple apartment s
buildings , commercial and industrial facilities of every type and
nature , for a period of ninety (90 ) days from date hereof , and relating
to the following described territory:
All that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 17 , Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E.
W.M. , lying east of FAI 405 and south of Chicago-St.Paul Milwaukee
and Pacific Railroad. Together with all that portion of the NW 1/4. ,
of Sec. 20 Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E.W.M. , lying East of FAI 405 and
North of the Puget, Sound Power and Light Company transmission
line easement.
-1=
c
In the event that the study and review of the City' s Comprehensive
Plan and related documents as same affect the abovedescribed area
have not been completed within said ninety day period, then this
moratorium shall be renewed, without -further action of the City Council ,
for an additional period of sixty (60) days .
The aforespecified moratorium shall not apply to existing apartmr4
single family or duplex dwellings or the renovation, repair or
maintenance of same.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 26t1day of Septembe,r0_977 .
41f211 elle2161#e ores . ea , er
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 26th day of September , 1977 .
Charles Delaurenti , Mayor
Approved as to form: '
G ard M. S ellan, City Attorney
-2-
V
0F R•
0
��
AO. ,4-
• OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON,WASHINGTON
O w 4+ $
5 ,yI POST OFFICE BOX 828. 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 96055 255-8878
AO Q" GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
o9bTfo SEPSE�� October 4 , 1977
TO: Gordon Y . Ericksen, Planning Director
FROM: Lawrence J . Warren, Assistant City Attorney
Re : City Council Referral - Renton Hill Petition
Review of Comprehensive ' Plan and Zoning •
•
Dear Gordon:
This Memorandum is in response to your Memorandum of September
28 , 1077 addressed to Mr . Shellan. Since you posed your questions
in numerical order, my answers will be in the same order .
• 1 . "Area-wide zoning" is not defined in the Ordinances
as you mentioned . However, the •intent of the legislation would
make it apparent that the Council meant that the Planning Commission
should not be giving recommendations on individual rezone applica-
tions , but should .be dealing with a gicater area of land . which
might be defined as a- definite, discrete area of land defined by
• natural geographical or political boundaries , including .more than
• one ownership .
2 . Yes
3 . Yes
4 . If the Commission believes it could deal with both
comprehensive plan questions and the zoning questions at the
same public hearing, then there is nothing 'in the Ordinance system
that would militate against that arrangement. However , that would
appear to be a policy decision to be made by the Commission itself .
5 . In answering question 1 above , and referring to section
2-207 ( B) , it would appear that the Planning, Commission could make
its recommendation to the Council on the matter of zoning . However ,
I am not sure that the study on the Comprehensive Plan would be
entirely relevant to the question of a zoning change . Of course,
some of the elements will be the same but the Commission should
remember that the Comprehensive Plan is a long range planning
devirce ;'. while zoning is much more of an absolute action. '
I hope this Memo answers the questions that you have posed , but
should you require further information , please feel free to contact
me .
J A
' rat •r -Y .r..[5.,.i'
Lawrence J . Wrren
LJW :nd
1
.v, -.C.__ c A l Ir.-_—��N _L-. •c_+ 7... .. I,.•. •.-.,, r . , ] t
eT
' I *{=�blr;•;;•.. 1 ',• Y N-_-.ci 4 ` `.u<L,'r' ...Moctiv.5 .c •'�_— +�-...,_ ".1=i; =7 - _,.{541•r�:� • '----I r - = 1 "
_ a _• ','V.,. �•yr,1 � _; iir,A11.1 .L_ii.024It. =,. �C7 .-i �f••,AI'+=;-. T J1 •• L-
+ 1" Nv �N` I \.� 9 \• y• '�?""LL1 r ,nr.7T-~.-.ETL_, �_-.— ` n r,�E•,,-.. [-Li/-}.I•I.r 1-e.4{• -AV;E-, S.1J�ls.�A •hi'I.. \;\`, - r. • ®r \L �U�'_�.�:.i1LL.;1 _�� _li„ �.i1' _a I-/ 1'i`•F4`'!•h! Nwatimil I 1 I _
u i-- •r 1 I `:\\ \\�- _. --' ' -�"' ���� =1 � !?�1Y1!=L_��$ J ' 7 i ii - T-- --- �G'q� `�.
• ` AVE S. 4�_�
f�. •. 1_ J-OT i20. \s' - a �J `� - BURNETT - Lr �rYvr•:1^ -_ri
ri _
'TALC EX T. „ aNEi.,evE .• y ��_- '. __ -�- I•`•I.t i :(:- .s •
j \\\,s\ - -_ -� 1 •. i6'...,.,s`r l.. , �-T 1 Y P
• i� i Iry .1'�,.IN' :I I-:t .i.,...,.�=� _����_,.1_. I �
.L._f.__L_ ___._ i\� ..s 1'-117:is••rir�.lr st e, ,, 1! • , .�+_,1. 14,E_11.:JN .2- � -7--I-� ;i_ t ak-_J _.
auRNET
'• � ^ '- -_- 1_.�aialrCf�'�,'�j -�N1 ca'cA.M:a6 '\L_l:�z.,s�i� '=F etAV EI!Ek, =�st FkFF. � —7• a-
--�� �\ -------.e l...r Y�.IrI-:-' -1, 11.1.iA.A.0 •.l. ,C.TT:- rTc:T4v.r.?•-� r��py¢C��.'
�r�r-rTI-1'1
\ \ `� z 1•_-f J.tP ,, II { L:1 ! i� 11 i ``✓� Zwrcr�n�s
I \I -I:u1.41;i_t1L=' -l-:;j:+lerlc'a' a'
/- , I I 5 .:47-'`- \1•rl ,••. �A:•: er Nr r�NI+.Lt�l L �;
i \\ r• wEL s MAv
.- / , 1 =---_____-- ---I-.- - -� -• F•'-r- NENfiY FORD .o.,..a.\`=+•'•.-.r- `ts.. �L=
/• /, i� I i - ,\ _ _ L;' i ' '�_LENENt - IP _ '•- i-. i i �/ .
Ex. �' \ I _..__� r a 5' SCHOOL s.o. _.'1•i�i.-L _.' �•.r`i.•1 1. 1 NrTnniffm ELL 5
L-:et� rPP.'.J Fi u
iF ` - -•
- arni_- --• • wi.i, �a vEE.. L TI ,..„, ,. \` /a'r 1 I W 1(1 ■i�1����e���t�I
,' /" > I - ,+r 49. _ . ,r , ,.--Tr,4r- Joi /\� ,•^I-t- , 41.1.4-1X1• 1511LI 1-FMi-; - .,;:4+k
i� - f�iilal` t'll`Y` ©ii' 'ill
c�
••
I
--L --- ----� r --------- -----� = a e"e" ' �.s' i f r. ..el -1-i I , i I • T o • - 1- 1 '' ! I ELEMEIRY
• - • i_- . [ SCHOOL
N.
i / //• p�•
r- - --'d'r' T- �• - -�'Ir- ,�L. g•�}• _• s-���f�,. (...ii-:'E'.. ..�• :.•_.1 \ �fi',' ln ��filJ.. ,lo
•
` I
I. -r'- t _ F• _� `V I I I I. I , ' . M • µ/ VE. N.
er� r�, ,: [�' ] iiiiiii`i��i7i r+;ar�rrrrfl
- f— - -- • — f C l-_1-J l 1 1 l �' ' ..*1'�� v' -— - -- -------- - �r r \ ao� YLkk
1 ..'.�+ a�� '� I NI
.� F_•CT ` Ari.VE.
mil
t .
N I A.V E b • / '.I, • i P� Z
. /
....._.4(t4ikirc._._.'N"-..„....N...N...s.N,,.,........„....s_,__ /.................._______
• . 0.2;4405 , , .
.7.;''.n. _,• i . , „ , / 1 (
\ � // �( 1
f' `� tipa
if/
.. ,,,:r • ' . T_rYE �F
• • A.o .Ai + I • MONT 0.EY O, r
c PRIN(-7
Vuno.,m 1 \ // /
.7 M�,
F i ��',,' o , // J /j J
/ y
s \n \\ // 1 r o
I
- -A '--
?7-5., �.f.., !�j_.__..e r AVE ]E T"^`-e\ \ t - i`J f 1 \, / _ - _ --_- _ _ _ �1
- �Ve /o/°L
•
WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE
September 26 , 1977
1. An Ordinance for second and final reading
adopting by reference Title 9A of the Wash-
ington Criminal Code.
2 . A Resolution setting a hearing date on a
portion of S .W. Harris Place. The hearing
date has been set for October 17 , 1977.
3. A Resolution at the request of the Municipal
Court declaring certain equipment surplus ,
namely typewriters , to obtain the best
possible terms for the City on a cash basis .
4 . A Resolution declaring a moratorium for a
period of 90 days on a certain portion of
the City generally known as Renton Hill
prohibiting the construction or alteration
40r
of any multiple apartment building, commercial,
or industrial facility but excluding existing
apartments , single family or duplex dwellings
or the renovation, repair or maintenance of
same. The Resolution also provides that in
case the studies have not been completed and
a review of the City ' s Comprehensive Plan in
the 90 day period, this moratorium should be
renewed for an additional 60 day period.
(S
Earl Clymer, Chairman
Barbara Shinpoch
/`S/
George Perry
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
September 26 , 1977 Municipal Building
Monday , 8: 00 P . M . Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag and opened the regular meeting of the Renton City Council .
ROLL CALL OF GEORGE J. PERRY, Council President; EARL CLYMER, RICHARD M.
COUNCIL STREDICKE. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED.
The meeting recessed at 8:05 p.m. and reconvened at 8:12 p.m. Roll
Call : PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE, PERRY, CLYMER AND STREDICKE.
MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ABSENT COUNCILMAN KENNETH D. BRUCE
AND COUNCILWOMAN BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH BE EXCUSED. CARRIED.
STAFF IN C. J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; GWEN MARSHALL,
ATTENDANCE Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning
Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; RICHARD GEISSLER,
Fire Chief; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief; DONALD D. CUSTER, Administra-
tive Assistant.
•
PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle.
MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER
12, AND SEPTEMBER 19, 1977 AS PREPARED AND MAILED. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Charles Shane, 3003 Mt. View Ave. N. , objected to proposed 90-unit
condominium on Renton Hill because of inadequate water, street
Renton Hill access , fire protection and asked that environmental impact be
prepared. Mr. Shane also objected that Renton Hill residents must
attend lengthy hearings and questioned vacation of Grant Ave. S.
Public Works Director Gonnason noted Grant Ave. S. has not been
vacated, additional right-of-way has not been acquired. Gonnason
explained environmental impact statement would be required at the
proper time. Councilman Stredicke reported building moratorium
placed on Renton Hill (Res. #2137 9/26/77). City Attorney Shellan
advised against Council participation in this subject matter until
such time as it officially comes before the body.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notice having been posted,
Street Vacation published and mailed, exceeding legal requirements, Mayor Delaurenti
Portion of opened the public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion of
SW 12th St. SW 12th Street together with nearby alley, lying southerly of SW
(S. 150th Pl . ) Grady Way and easterly of Oaksdale Ave. SW9 northerly of FAI-405.
Letter from Board of Public Works , Warren Gonnason, Chairman, noted
review of proposed vacation as petitioned by Coldwell Banker on
behalf of E.R. and A.M. Turner and Yvonne A. Lucker. The letter
reported no need for retention of utility easements and no objections
to the proposed street vacation as the right-of-way is not necessary
for present or future use as part of the City' s traffic circulation
system and would be consistent with previous vacation of adjacent
rights-of-way. Public Works Director Gonnason used wall map to
point out area and the Springbrook Creek, as requested by Councilman
Stredicke. Gonnason reported no conflict. Councilman Stredicke
explained to C.W. Minaker, Attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Turner (also
present) the City' s policy of receiving payment of 1/2 appraised
valuation of property to be vacated. Mr. Minaker expressed belief
that this vacation was completion of prior incomplete street vacation
and charges should be in accord. Councilman Clymer reported the
entire street had not been vacated previously to prevent landlockinq
of property. Councilman Stredicke notes► if street was not vacated,
off-site improvements could be required. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND
THORPE, COUNCIL CLOSE THE HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND THORPE, THE CITY VACATE THE PORTION OF SW 12th STREET AS
REQUESTED WITH THE PAYMENT OF ONE-HALF APPRAISED VALUE AND MATTER
BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR IN-HOUSE APPRAISAL AND
TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ORDINANCE. CARRIED.
CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all
Council Members are considered routine and are enacted by one motion
unless removed by Council action for separate consideration.
f ,
Renton City Council
9/26/77 Page 2
Consent Agenda - Continued
Mayor' s Proclamation of Mayor Delaurenti named the week October 9 to 15,
Proclamation 1977 as Fire Prevent Week, urging effective fire safety. Council
Fire Safety Week concurrence recommended.
Cedar Center Letter from Planning Department Housing and Community Development,
Park Fund Acting Coordinator Gary Kruger, requested fund transfer in amount
Transfer of $5,000 between Cedar Center Park funds in order to continue
construction detail work on the Cedar Center Park by City staff.
Refer to the Ways and Means Committee.
Voucher Ways and Means Committee report recommended Council approval for
Approval payment of Vouchers No. 15275 through 15420 in the amount of
$127,713.29 having received departmental certification; also
approval requested for LID #302 Revenue Warrant R-4 in amount of
$10,202.05 and Cash Warrant C-4 $52.05 and C-5 'in amount of $10,150.
Warrants 15271 through 15274 were machine voided. Council concur-
rence recommended.
Claim for Claim for Damages was filed by Pioneer Distributors, 326 S. 3rd St. ,
Damages John Swanson, in amount of $298.06 for cost of plumbing repairs,
alleging insufficient inspection by the City inspector at time
of installation of undergrounding and sidewalks. Refer to City
Attorney and Insurance Carrier.
LID 308 Letter from City Clerk Mead reported receipt of petition for street
Street improvements on SW 34th St. and SW 41st St. between Lind Ave. SW
Improvements and the East Valley Freeway, which had been verified by the Public
Works Dept. that petition represents 100% of the total front foot-
age. The letter recommended that the Council set date of 11/7/77
for public hearing on the preliminary local improvement district
roll and that the matter be submitted to the Ways and Means Com-
mittee for resolution. Council concur and refer to Ways and
Means Committee. (See additional referral on Page 3)
Appointment Mayor Delaurenti announced appointment of Robert J. Kingen, 3014
Lake Washington Blvd. N. , to the Planning Commission to complete
the term of George C. Nelson, now resigned. Appointment effective
through 1/31/80. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
Consent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA
Approval AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
Surplus Letter from Municipal Judge Stone requested permission to place
Typewriters three surplus typewriters in the Police Auction October 4, 1977
and listed manufacturer and serial numbers, requesting referral
to the Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Moved by Perry,
Second Thorpe, Council refer request to the Ways and Means Com-
mittee. Councilman Stredicke asked for information such as age
and use, etc. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE,
COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER TO THE MAYOR'S OFFICE. CARRIED.
Request for Letter from Gerald D. Cavenee, 2424 Dayton Ave. NE requested
Sewer Connection City sewer connection of property located at approximately 13406
G. Cavenee SE 99th St. (Sierra Heights area) . The letter noted service would
be for single family residence and perc test has been disapproved
due to unfavorable soil conditions. The letter noted support of any
annexation of the area. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL
REFER MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
1978 Property Letter from King County Council Chairman, Mike Lowry, reported the
Tax Levies County Council is required by RCW 84. 52.070 to certify the amount
of property taxes levied in King County annually to the County
Assessor and requires the amount of taxes to be levied for each
taxing district, that the deadline for submitting 1978 property
tax levies is 10/28/77. The letter stated that for Renton to receive
any property taxes in 1978, Resolution must be received by the
County by the 10/28 date, that the Assessor will notify each district
Renton City Council
9/26/77 Page 3
Correspondence - Continued
Property Tax of its assessed valuation within few weeks and forms will be supplied
Levies - to use in submitted levy. Councilman Perry noted dilema of need
Continued for tax levy information prior to receipt; Mayor Delaurenti noted
letter would be directed to Assessor and Mr. Lowry. MOVED BY THORPE,
SECOND PERRY, REFER COMMUNICATION TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.
CARRIED.
Recess MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY , COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Council
recessed at 9:57 p.m. and reconvened at 9:02 p.m. Roll Call : All
present as previously shown.
OLD BUSINESS Councilwoman Thorpe submitted petition signed by 238 citizens for
Community the new Senior Center which had been presented at the 9/22/77 com-
Services mittee meeting concerning Senior Center and a petition against the
Report center. Mrs. Thorpe noted session well attended, that major concern
was adequacy of Sartori School , amount and method of financing and
Senior Citizen architectural agreement. Councilman Clymer had explained Sartori
Center not available on long-term basis, explained costs, that estimated
8/0 of overall cost would be for architectural and engineering fees.
Councilwoman Thorpe explained that majority of persons present
favored center and urged progression of project.
Public Services Public Services Committee report was submitted by Councilman
Committee Report Stredicke recommending Council concurrence in request of the Valley
General Hospital agreement authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
Valley Medic I to execute agreement. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
LID #308 Councilman Stredicke requested added referral for Consent Agenda item
SW 34th & street improvements for SW 34th and SW 41st St. at Lind Ave SW,
SW 41st Street Glacier Park applicant) L. I . D. #308. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND
Improvements THORPE, ADDITIONAL REFERRAL FOR LID #308 TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES
COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report
Committee Report recommending second and final readingsof an ordinance adopting by
Ordinance #3156 reference Title 9A of the Washington Criminal Code; first reading
Criminal Code 9/19/77. Following readings , it was MOVED BY MOVED BY CLYMER,
SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL
AYES. CARRIED.
• Resolution #2136 The committee report recommended reading and adoption of a resolution
Street Vacation setting a hearing date of 10/17/77 for vacation of a portion of
SW Harris P1 . SW Harris P1 . located between Hardie Ave. SW and Rainier Ave. S.
Following reading, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN RESOLUTION. CARRIED.
Resolution # 137 The committee report recommended reading and adoption of a resolution
Building declaring a moratorium for a period of 90 days on certain portion
Moratorium of the City generally known as Renton Hill prohibiting the construc-
Renton Hill for tion or alteration of any multiple apartment building, commercial ,
Study of City' s or industrial facility but excluding renovation, repair or mainte-
Comprehensive nance of existing apartments , single family or duplex dwellings.
Plan of area The Resolution also provides that in case the studies have not been
completed, renewal period of additional 60 days allowed. Following
reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLU-
TION. CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.
The Council meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Delores A. Me d , Ci Clerk
EXP111 26 CITY OF RENTON
WARRANT DISTRIBUTION 9/26/77
FUND TOTAL WARRANTS
MACHINE VOIDS: NO.#I527I - #15274
CURRENT FUND *1406092S
PARKS AND RECREATION FUND $7i60790E.
STREET FUND 012,a943990
LIBRARY FUND $5411913
STREET FORWARD THRUST eQ92eS3
WATERWORKS UTILITIY FUND 0700E53664.
AIRPORT FUND $2, 06905
$975 WATER 6 SEWER CONSTR 04,905953
EQUIPMENT RENTAL M4DS0504
FIREMEN PENSION 09, 600900
TOTAL OF ALL WARRANTS 01270 ,13929
WE, THE •UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OF THE
RENTON CITY COUNCILS HAVING RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION TWAT
MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES HAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY
APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO. 15275 THROUGH NO. 15420 IN THE AMOUNT
OF $127, 713$29 THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1977,
COMMITTEE A '�` �. MEMBER ® . e 0 . ® 61 w e e . 0
CHAIRMAN
L. I .D.# 302
MEMBER . gs
REVENUE WARRANT NO.# R-4 $10,202.05
CASH WARRANT NO.# C-4 $ 52.05
CASH WARRANT N0.# C-5 $10, 150.00
e nto n H.
resod
e nts ripc4.4.,....dt_
C ILY , Loning discrirninati.ôn
Renton Hill residents banded to- Cedar Avenue South, focus of the concerns and presented at the
gether to present a united front controversy,is now zoned to permit hearing.
against a developer and charge the apartments.
"We're Opposing apartment de-
city with "zoning discrimination" "Testing.the waters" velopment on the hill and feel it's a
when the issue of growth in their Developer Farrell, involved in an violation of the community planning
- neighborhood was aired Wednesday eight-unit condominium now under process," neighborhood spokesper-
during a Renton Planning Commis- construction on Cedar,said his firm son Cathy Keolker said. "Develop-
sion meeting. "was just testing the waters" with ment will have a detrimental effect."
More than 120 hill .residents, recent advertisements for a 90-unit In response to the concerns,neigh-
armed with a plank of recommended facility.
land use changes, crowded 'city But,he said,it would be improper bors also forwarded a four-point
council chambers to urge the plan- to flaunt "zoning discrimination" awye Bobprogram ofrelief McBethbmitted by their.
ning commission to prohibit apart- against people "who can't afford In the meantime,the commission's
ment development on Renton Hill. single-family homes." He said the comprehensive plan committee will
And developer' Gene Farrell, development over 10 acres is not like consider land-use map changes in a
Homeco Realtors, arrived with apartment development "and is not meeting Wednesday at 7:30 p.m. in
drawings of a proposed 90-unit con- all that much denser than tlAe neigh- city hall. i
dominium that"could give this older borhood now."
neighborhood needed outside en- Farrell said an environmental im-
couragment." pact statement would be needed if
The commission, after taking the$4 million development goes any
about two hours of testimony on the further.But at this time no plans or
question of growth versus status permits have been submitted or
quo, decided to refer the matter to granted, planning department
committee and continue the hearing head Gordon Erickson confirmed.
• Oct. 12. Neighbors cited their major con-
What residents are asking is a cerns as traffic volume,access to the
change in the city's comprehensive hill, children's safety and school
land-use plan, a zoning guide, and busing,crime rate,views,the quality
actual zoning to prohibit multi- of hill life, the hill's historic value
family dwellings on the hill. and a collective pride of ownership.
The request would require a land- • Petitions gathered
use map change first, and a down- Petitions of more than 230 names
zone later since the west side of were gathered in support of those
1
Page 2 - Record-Chronicle - Section A - Friday, September 16, 1977
•
b r
s
Y
«i
: _b S
y .
k
st,(
,
n RR
t
sot
• M
Ar.,.: - - ' r.,:::;:ic.:-.,....„.,, ':: :,,,.., . .,....,::,.:22,-..... .
_.. ,
r<
• LEADERS OF RENTON HILL RESISTANCE LISTEN TO DEVELOPER PLANS Staff photos by CATHY BUl
...Amelia Telban, Ruth Larson, Peggy Jernigan, Claude Rogers, Kathy Koelker and attorney Bob McBeth
evident Rënton eo a ow irom
, • -
•,, ( • .
444(4 1,
s •
. •
„ .
t
•
. _
• „„. • -
•
DAVE FARRELL
...Homeco Realtors
is sr a
•
* ; ' , .;—`—' , -• 1\\V\ 'T‘ ,f -,' • \\\', - pr--,r.:---5.-., g r o
' - --.',-,4-11i0,-irct',-,,.'...V,'-'-' 6.,_'''--.----L!,..:rtr:r.7.„,H—",1 A.-----L,1 ,'.,,, . i,
_-
i__ _I __ i_ .: ,.,.---. -, , 1 . ..„3, . \\ ',- - ! ,,,,,,,i „ ---, 1, --1.',-.;_----1-,—. -1,-_, ,, ---v-'---‘sb,.,'""rr il. 1 ••, . --. • ; ..•
r-1 ---1-- .----, f ii t, , .------1, s\\ '...,:i..62.A.Kg ,i..i,,6',,i.6cgs: . '..',.J.'1.g_7_-_ #!,'.0'E-.CEP_Si LT ir] ET,',i.14,'fr--.,,iii ArfOR 41.5,
-1:2' ' t L___--- 1- ‘-2-. .- ,”'1.-' •'',,' \----7:r '17', \\\ tri--.T-;:-.7•::-.---••'41 r,‘:.al.k...let...r.;;--."-1, f":" ,VV.-A.-7_711 4t,\--rr.,-f la.....F.:f._-:_t ;?" -,',..?-..1;7_74
-.:..•-'-.;L-.--2-L1:Lk1tr.;"--.,--..-...p.i!,.i.„l4„.1','-.---t----,_-1-,--.,..•..-_.,'ItI-•"---_--3,..71-,HL--1----,.
1;:•-•7•
—'\...,.-,---•"L r4e'i-c',-0'''-T',-.''.:"_-.,:!.‘..'.
t';--`.\-.1;,..,.-,,•.‘, - --a--..1=-(-7--- M,1 1,-,-\..r,..'_.0-.4,_)[.11.:1..a0_,r\_1_6\..T_-,1.-__.,yA.....,Va,,_','a E',._-_.:•-•7.S'.A L,0",i1'I'i17?a.i9,i-i,---.j-
...,,d.,,..7L'-.:.;_-i_-7._r_1..0-i.i11-,.-,.._-1±_._,1__.',i-'',,_i,I`-,I,,-,,„a--i''l-_i•4.aLt-nr"i'lf1 r1i",-,.,-:'.,,IX_--I,.;_s--_,','-p..i''--.'_L''r,,--'..7',1_'.-i'ir•.;.4d'i'I 1k'•t-'.-.-r71`7 7.1--7.,7.',':-,-a7 1-t-.\.-c,,'--,.''a''-7-.7A-\-.'--L----7i-.7r\.h-.a_H.3"aX-.ri 4,ti'r.u4,._\.I.-''3i.,1..1';_-2-tI 1r thr1.''r'"1 v-:1•-.i•e,1lt4s'r..i 1i j14r.-jr.1t.-.1It 7,,..,;--1-r'_--L,:_i--..;.:".1I._-.,:11 Oi.;1..1'4i-:e 1-/x,7_.,,r7-1-v:'i''-'e,,',\'-•,,1.s„1r',fr'1 e.'!.-"y1_,I'_'r.i,,_•.T•.:"•,„,:..T1.-i.-11.-iI1,'1
N.1%„..I.;•‘.W,
,,_c,'-_'•-.-F'.,ii.--i-1,h--.-r1'"i7,f"'!1—fl--i-L17j---i--1-i:--LT,-1-J]-76.-.0-wE1''----
•
-r
----
-CI• S.U-VLR.N6--E r,•--•,F,-i-._,i iA-
"
-
. \\\ : \ iAl s -
-
17r ri
_ •, A BURNETT ,fZ 1 _ --
_ 7 , 1 , + 01 -
0 7411- liana.'
._,--_.:•_z_.. -,-,-rel- ------__ ••., ,------TP,4i.r...1•-1-,-1 1...-.'11-ti."1•1'14.-71..-- ,sr".'7''''''' '''''''''''I-1- -- -s," T '-`-
-----2 7 TTIL. —vs.-.‘,. '-c-T-- , . . — . , - •., . . : ;,..1 • • . -----/Aiiiiitgigre/1.1.1.1.t.1.1.I.
_--- 1 i 1 ' - ' - 1 -1
;NI , . '4 ": • . ! • ,:,-., .. atfi.ti IA M.5
)C-‘6
"-)- \LI.;:.alsiaiiala(4161 ',..1.17_,. 111.1.1.,4..,,A.-';--.-
-- , L 1 ' 1 ; s:. .-,
,.. ,i .... ..-7.777FIZ,Y1.;..,-
.----
1-14-14.L1411 MI11111441
, ,____,---,,,,, .,.. , ,
••• ,"-
I
'''';---L-‘------------: \ I , 1
! 1 , • - ''----. "-----
-',..,_
-- SCHOOL al; A•1•Ibi:IFIEZ_ N..1 1„...,:_. .i•-•_0.= ---
mA,,v_ AvA ' '." II , r,-/// .
,
. , , , , , , 1._ , ,ELL.5 '
Ifi Je:. a /
1 , • - -
:ir 5PT.9. .-1' r' r;16. •U'ilOIW/ */‘,*".. . I111:1Y-bn_14t1.1.1.14.44 1W_Liii.ii4iiiittillSiirdli.1
LGY
1 -- ---------7---- '• ' \\ L_•_.(4'I.i- 14.1
•i-,-• 7L3ie--
,i1
. ,
7.•—,,---T---:L.`1._-
;, I •4'7,1..., „.._N,,\
,
2 4/- .• ••‘51.%
/-411r111a11;010N11411d! W1iliddl,ii_i1 4 1111
— — 1 / - , 1 — - 1 11-rrrrrr _ iW_7Ii1IiI1PI1AIi1Ii4RthIK6I'i
1d6,g111d!
7 0 IQ
T. I '.• ‘1..... - ,Cl/ I ' I , j ' I ."^.."' /1 'I I 1 r-- a , \' 7 • 'V
Vt.i! : AfKr.0,lik .
/'''' 1 I ' '- 7.----.4--- - ' -t--i- .;.-., ,-- ..--,f--...-As-,-.-- 1:--di I ''••1. ',--t-i i4-1 - 1 \ \ ' ' .- ' DI. a : 4 i ' 11' ,t Lunn Ry.
/ ' a I a ii -• a i' '4'.!.'.. .ri" . 0.7i 11.;:: t.1....j?r...ti,...t-,r.i.-...,,c.,1.11,.:_,,,,--... ,,, , 1, . i
ry
i ______ , _ _L_ •1_ -, i ,q'1-'1 _L_ • • • - 'I 1 I'i',. _., '''IL. 1." ,, i 1- 1. ,, .' - ,,-
,.,''C,' I• - r /
.)0 t- -zt. GARDEN
7 1 . ..,
..- — ---117-464-- ''t i 4 t ---f- ' \\\ \
Tz--7----- r7, a -,71-417.I.i'k...•I',I • ' ' ,7,' '' r f,-. : ' — - , • ,\ ' ' IC 6z" iiiiiiii—iiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
z-----4---40-- 12;. 4`1 '1•'W T-g--.-V71'1.' .15
I I , ,,.: .; :i'..t .,.. . i. •--; 8 : • r'lk) . 7-ligall 41 lill1901.941-1 el 10119111.
_optAIN17,--.- .----IL ' I , ,f rill j j , \,N, -i
,,, , ii „, i ,,,,,EA•• __ ,y!..i Nil
_
, (
rn- 1.-z ,-'7-101-;-1--,7.T.,-::-Fi 1 .-, ,4-',,, • -- ?- / 71179 ' iiiiiiiiiii
-- --<-.r------- , ,
J7jJ
h.. --',,,..-2"----.. •
\ ,
__ . ._ \—_ .,_,..,_ •i - I 1. - - '' .) 'N :.,/ MI Al,!!!!!!fflig LithINIJAIL.W.I.'11
—--1—' —— n 1, 11 ' 2 ,,
g 1 1 tj . ? .'.1 i •.; 1 r IL-ii;'t;,'-' c,,;-:;•'!_. (' ' y , i 1 ..,,..
V AVE
zT R
La.lqati s
, '\, - '. ,
. ,
-,,
' .
it
• ' 1 ; i ;
,''' )) 4
1 5 ler
.N.
, t i, , ;,,:
,// rc'r-- ' •-
•
'I I I I .
,i
, •I / Z .
. , .
'
, . .
X<
,. .ecarn ---' ' , , . r-- / 1 73 / • -..,
'
, / '........ --......... •
4--
, . ----....._:_.
-, .---------......._
• ) ..- -'...),
c a
.'
7 ,• LL•-.i-s_. a , , ( , ,
z I
•
•
, . , ( „ •
,-'-------- --",'-: „
F .
i - wiewia.
I VULMOorr Pl.II
I:-C)-----4 • -..7'-' . ‘,ki,' "0 ',
A/ ---" EN22
Th)7_
/ , \
- 'A-' z A‘.,• ‘, _Q, .
. [ 1 /
FL-1"A:hlE‘IMIIPV .
/
....,,.,. ..-.7-
/
,
..--,-
=..,
Mecovadia.
.,,,--_,------'-'
/ • 0 ' c \ /
AV 0'
/ i -
„
/
,, 1 '
V
. - •
„'"...'.-
i I
• /
1 •
r,1 0
ra,,..
/
--i-,-, • . . ,- .
•,•,•
. .„-•
,
"I -
• ,
... /
k 1-'
'-/' , ., • ', 0 ‘,
LIMEIrl,,,, (ey,73 C , / /// • . ....:,----
":--c,
c© .
--A
i
s \,(-,,, ( ' , ,
-,05-._ ,P..--, -__ , •,..,AVE SE - -- - -
/
I —17 .--- ......--1
All that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 17, Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E. ,
W.M. , lying east of FAY 405 and south of Chicago-St. Paul Milwaukee and
Pacific Railroad. Together with all that portion of the NW 1/4 of Sec.
20 Twp. 23 N. , Range '5 E. , W.M. , lying east of FAI 405 and North of the
Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line easement
Renton City Council , ' _
6/6/77 Page 3
Consent Agenda - Continued
Energy Director. Other members: Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner,
:onservation and Clark Petersen, Library Director. Committee will coordinate
2ommittee the City' s energy conservation measures. Information.
kppointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs. Joan A. Walker, 1433
'lanning Monterey Ave. NE, to three-year term on the Planning Commission
:omission effective 7/1/77 through 6/30/80, having served on the Commission
since 1975 and presently Vice Chairman. Refer to the Ways and Means
Committee.
appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointted Peter Banks additional -
udge Pro tem Municipal Court Judge Pro tem. The letter explained Mr. Banks is
with law firm of Hardwick and Conrad, Evergreen Building; appointment
effective through 12/31/77. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
onsent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AS
pproval PRESENTED. CARRIED.
ORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
mior Citizen Letter from Leland Pumel , Chairman, Senior Citizens Planning Committee
?titer informed Council of motion passed unanimously at their 5/16/77 meeting
recommending that the Mayor and City Council pass a $600,000 limited
general obligation bond to complete the senior center. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMUNITY
SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
'strict Court Letter from Mayor Delaurenti requested Committee of the Whole agenda
'ase of 6/9/77 include presentation by Del Bennett on lease negotiations
with the County for District Court space; lease agreement must be
executed by 6/30/77. Presentation to include proposed allocation
of space for Municipal Court. Moved by Perry, Second Clymer, Council
refer communication to the Public Services Committee for review and
recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN REQUEST OF MAYOR'S OFFICE AND REFER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE
WHOLE. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: THORPE, SHINPOCH, BRUCE; 3-NO: PERRY,
1 STREDICKE, CLYMER. MAYOR DELAURENTI VOTED AYE AND BROKE TIE VOTE.
MOTION CARRIED
tecomer' s Letter from William L. McLaughlin, Jr. , 10630 SE 176th, Renton,
Ieement requested a latecomer' s agreement for a water line he is installing
er line in the Kennydale area , noting the plan filed with Water Department, No.
W-463. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST
TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
ton Hill A petition bearing 63 signatures of residents of Renton Hill , mainly
r Ave S. Cedar Ave. S. requested rezone of Cedar Ave. S. in its entirety for
ests single family dwellings, except those multi-family units currently
le Family j in existence, based on reasons : (1 ) Traffic pattern accessibility,
ng street width and parking not adequate; (2) Do not wish to forfeit
views by allowing apartments to locate in neighborhood; all residents
taking pride in homes andhaving- gone •to considerable expense in both
htime and money to improve older homes. The letter noted the neighbor-
hood is a quiet place to live and intent to keep it that way. Moved
I by Perry, Second Stredicke, Council refer communication to the Planning
Commission for review and recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY
SHINPOCH, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING
ON RENTON HILL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED.
ce Refunding Letter from Mayor Delaurenti attached letter from City' s investment
\ 81 Sewer consultants, Seattle-Northwest Securities Corp. signed by Richard T. 1`
Kennedy, Vice President, concerning recommendations for advance refund-
ing of $2,950,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, 1976. The
Mayor' s letter concurred with Mr. Kennedy's recommendations and noted
Kennedy would meet with the Ways and Means Committee 6/6/77 at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Kennedy' s letter attached schedule of existing debt service and
proposed refundinn ics-ijP and savings. noting meeting with Public Works
Gonnason and Deputy Finance Director Bennett and the Finance Director,
Gwen Marshall . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN RECOMMENDATION AND REFER TO THE W YS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Mr. Kennedy, City's investment consu tant, was introduced.
•
h ,
We the undersigned residents and property owners of Y ,,,.��'1
vll. �
- ' Renton Hill wish to express our opposition to the building. '
V
of any additional .multiple dwellings at the upper end of f,
(/',/
Cedar Avenue South. We also oppose the zoning, planning
or building of multiple dwellings or industrial concerns ? I
in any other area of Renton Hill, or any adjacent area that
.might require access or right of way through our community. '
. Our basic reasoning for .the above opposition is that -
we are concerned about increased traffic, congestion , park-
ing problems, noise pollution , crime against personal property
and any other difficulties that arise from sudden large pop-
ulation •increases .within a given community. . '
•
We wish to make this opposition known to any and' .all
interested parties. ,,� k 0► - „>'.
4D (--) .
e. AUG `
-6
26 .1977
date • Name Address v --. '.:
./(. 7t. ,- . "; :0- ..,,I-0 ..- 6:a 4-Lk • d4.e=', e_. 'i , :
A R2;7,-,6--$.2, (2,2),_.. id_ . .
L 't� �� �
77 641i • - ace .--/. e —.�,
-/J' 72 ' 2" . .1;./.. R .,• Y ', - :1;,-,. .-„.,___. • I ' - ' • '- ' -1.. .
• -
r(L mac_Z�v�
_„L}ii
__ 3i,, . . v,o,. 6 : . / , '
7"/if,/7 7 -,f‘tii.‹.,g 771 :a_,a'-74 ' ' . , 3 e5- . j'l.ft,i;i%i Alik. i ,,246• , .
/i7 r `r--..1%."'7______,..-1 ---"'s A---s, atrk. .. AcHkAia.0.,.-t_,...6. . - •---) 7)-- . if. (AAA' . 2,7_ ,-.) .
,_ . - .
( ' ', 2 • • 71.:1 -14-'‘ .," '7,,,,,14/...e4.:Z : : , 5
Date ame
Address .
-1-1-L-2-9 ' '.7 7 74111.4--' C-7(14' _.- -i,--% e-7,--e.L . /1/4 ei ' S e (A. '7-1,4- .7-t1,4-7,-
R-/8- 77 '2 / i ( j 6:3O RAVI 4v , ki27Qr .
-/S - 7 7 In(71W16 4 0091r)1: 66 q udo n-/ith aej-e.Q1. -101)1=k4/
-� Ii 97 /a-,�f1 % 1333 , a. , Gv
Yg cyl /S64 -, gas G,1i cj. ,P S,,. Z
7 -, i. - 7 7 )2.--j../tp,g,r .::: ./ 4-/-4_,(---1.4...-&--"-- /V,a1 .5- ode__ e-e--2,1_,, Zaa CI 5
g -/r--- 77 0}11444 ',2_ „.0 , 00 : 4z. ,g.. y Q
4-CA
c..- r. i 17 lja4/i, . - y•J .
e� ..(- 77 64 : �� h,-� s�' �> 1 raj : .8 -/e - 77•. ,t� A ��
. :e7::-/. $7-27
ce, .„, f,', §, .._,74- _., .. /ye.'yl,i,.:6„e,.._..) Lv .,ii:
•:, -,:_,&/- .. 7 . : .c) ; ' 114-4-e, ‘),1* ' ' ;4 .4•4 ? : -
, 0-=/ -- 7 7 .- 2/ , ',A 4,j� zi, .
-/1�-77 : � f11 12 ' /l -3/4 S
3."1.,- 77 .*i j, ,ii - 49,1,,,, ,) : : /4-4/6 ,S '7.11- -S- '-
gt/e- ” -7,2_ ,_-:•<24 f A )t) PO - .5. - 7 --iiv--- - i
•s'- v -:7 -7 ' : -zc', (J *, ',„,_) 5.4. `).a & P-,. ..,,,:„. , .,1. .,3 .•.a40:.,/.5_, s_-,), . .., .. .
k-/ i- 7 7 ; I ' . )..-, .,L-70 ,P,. /.6.; t2-4, - ' 5--.cco 6-4.,44i..}, --d .,r. ._:,) _;
s /A: '7.7 A,t .e .,J 3r3:2. GR.9: r, yam., So.
. -ir- 2 7 lieL,:-..-4': .1•0 -.77:-ZW- Ziiiiiiiit. _:,_it, Z. 4.1Y e,.
6H- a - 7 7 . . : ,:0-0 ---fi e ..6 r..di4.4*, : I 4 ).5,7-(4.-'4-e'ii.A..;.- .4),dr.TeiV : .
,/, ../
? -/- . . ' /..17-.0 o -.. ..,,. c..;.- y;?5- _ -re--.-..7'.7)
-/ .:e- -7 7 ; & k i.Jr: 4I4L,_-:A .fi:.i3____Ik/ .C,/ie 4'4. i 7i / 1,?dA.)
5— 0 i - 7 7 .2 - '')-i-?- -1:1 .e:L-J- .6. e : :.b '-1°9/; ! ;.1
\Liz} - ; (.‘ - -7 -7 U . I i14 .S `7. cY
_ i (- 7 7 7 QX e-r4A- --e; A p, ..d,„. 13/y = S o .-? 4- , .
Date . Name Address
...Lb_ ,i7 w.,, .. . si \,,, . / 7)1 , (I ( �'e k jtic--e-7- ---.
-,9 17- 777 .,,.ti,l;c.,.-- < rt . CO1 v� _Sr)
. , • 2:-/7- 77 .. M art- 914 atit Jo
1? 17 . . ' % 'e % ,\_�,!! . $15 c a. Ste. "
-i -77 - , e gal ..�.� . a4L._ .4 . .
- , - 1„ijwIr
.L.ri, . go 7 G : .
- : 1:- -; 4
V-- )!" ' " ' • ' . X61 S4e7 .. .:a‘s: ', . ''''... .,
1.) , . /K
/� ' r .
_ 1 ` � �_ I � C . mil_ �G4"'�v2.-' 41-,.-71-2(4/ �r2�� 6.yL-�YL Q�yz-.E'er •,.
. , . . '6.'• . : '/ 7 .7. '7 .•., ...', -• (la46,i/i . '''.3 ..._. 4/ e, : 7 6 :Z- L4,:-/ .,;.•,6.6. • -,-- .t. .:
f U 7 7 77 �a d.�: ' ,•$3s: • . , .
. ,g•- .,I 1.- 11 '. ...L.,�Q . . 5 66, et. - .'
• -:•.)- 1 .7. . •)/// .' :: . -.- ipAid . , ,-;(1. • 5A .��r . . Sd,
'1",-.:.)?- 7. .11 ;..7/1/:-.' ' y.,..e/zze:._:.: • op--A,47.-, ;cei :20-;_. • , : • ; ;:;; ; •
• 1
• -g = Zo -7h : .k ,,a, ' -6--.o /- a -. ,
:/f- f----.' ' . "' 7,1":, _e„.am , . // -1 , %? t •�,2' r-�d
• ' */;31/- ? :, ;.'.,-/;7 --4'. : -4.' '''/ .' ''''I.L- ''''7:-7 ' X''7 '7,-.:AP' *):: 47i./, '..;. ..
/-.;L//t;) 7 - l,,i ,:,,:;. . . .,,4; :J / 47/ ._ ter, �..a- .. , ..
./ 7 7•' ? •.8' = 3 ,.,- : le., .
�-1., ? 7 AL/, f,�/�!� ' cam°-.) t r,.]"1 r - ,�' / ,: 4 �,.,, 4.c.;,.. : ,: _o ..
. -.it/ . 71 ' . 1' • +2-.&. ....4:;.eLai-it> -ti. • • • .- - g,. ; `gt'tt-e-e • .4 :... _.),L-.:', - :-. • '.
-.Z%•-7-) . . i-1 .40,4_, . 3i v 7?„2.n',.n . Ar4L'w. ':: .
gH-'af/- '7 j. -` ; (A): 5L o;J ' 7 ¢.„`e ,` l .
;. '.• 1-\_• . . .. • (A: '. 3)-4 z .•
. : , L,:,...;.:2 ) _.,7 .) ., . .. .... ::-.,•• .,,, ...,.... • -::Y '. - .r.''. -. . •_z -... H. 3s.7 . k._ __.,,,:).1•L__,a L - ei4itt
lyt-0,/
--z i . -7 7 • • •Z fj ,PN I -" . S c
•_ -c,2,/ - 7 7 s .ice . / 2 .3.�z - a. . ►,�:!'
Da Le Name Address _
1 0-6t4 i (f , ..z ., 77 .a, t, v��v /o o z g.'4A•
r _.ECG " ,r ,.
li I rt
r . t
Lti.OAA:Lek- O�.QJ r k
I' " " rfotA.4.1 )XjanoLlk , goo .aft.o...i- ge, .
" ' " PYY142.0 A YY?evi 2-m. '/0 0 9 i9/4,y ,/9O , g 1
. 46,-e-
.)-y, , _ /00 l 6 .. 4 .
40 %,._/, geo• .., .._(--,
A
/-4u�c ! /OOP 1` C ., a ,
1R - 77: i , /ere "/ .a440-1A)
B= 1 -77 i9-n o g041-31ea) :/ndo 94 at - }
;ik- :7 7 191,,,;,,, ,26,,,,tie,t/ fOct ,1
r_rr_,,,t_pt
- (&-7 j 7 r'h; ZA.,_/ ,D.,c At . 5
- / s- 7 7 Z2,6-6(0 PoNt..( 9 1 610/14--S.
11 -77 a 1„ Y &-Cl is.�',i, ..Af i�1e.J '70 ,0 t,�„c,0,t-,' ai,Lt• 44/ . , '
y / 7 , ,r 4-. Z 71 ;�: cr.r� ' trite P: 7 0 A' �1, 72^:t (.[:t�A
' 8 -aq - 77 ' `1 btAke--4-i 1° /141-6)4-) 6/E 6S0 . --
2.4 - - 1 14 727.6)A,r`)41. 7/ ei- e-4-,--24, 6t z-e. Sr
%-ri-Otiy. Li C>,( ___4_21_21_&al. ...c_f_________
Y.L... St-^ -77 41. 1x,,,yez-44.-er zoii ie.._t.&.., L„,__ _A,, .
8- 2A/ - 77 I S(jigN° 90 .6,7% i1 . /9v e :$G
y - v '//% f .,,P.
b. a V 7) ,,,..,-Z ,
e// ran/ 4e .g. 7?e-, 4
_6=_2J1- 77 /.4.4":,,Ced- ,‘ _go c g•erA.-vf 5., ,ee.. 76„.
f ki 7 7 Li r0s
3.-_-g-14- i� E ti- cols 6 : ;
Date Name _ Address •
.31 4fl ? 7 4/04 ,.Cr y��- ' : .5'
9- 77 'eelfA /. 1/ I 7
'°( 9/77. 0Q--ite-e„, 7/ a •NA-1.1- 1.-7-a44:a- 4/14 ,
�f y - 27 W(, � �`
1VL2q- dz.64,20
5-P-771 „ p. am(
7/5— // ..L e'1324
- - 77 44 70 7 ,i '
- 71 .� Z41 7171? i /-u Sd_
f-1,44 -7 ), 7, / ii,V(t4e,o
g' .14.17 .7 70 1 .4!-*/ *)4
74s , : (gfilr1404r r/3 _S
8- 45-99 Qua. 8 ES m b
cZ5 l 1,/ C?/X �J'L L �i/ P✓7 14 0-0
- 0�
y671:44fRA : : ." '
_ 7 '7//07-as-7. 77 - .
: /3 41-y J . /gPG :4
e ,:ef,"-/Zotaet :7/4- ra-714,e
-�j 77 p . 5 Roy: / bA er : sn
-J1r1 - OtOtly:k_ L )-Y 1, ;; 41"qup_. 9r)
25 7 7I /..�6.z�i,s�� i��
77. 5 � 715' 1,�Lr. . _44 .
90
(40
: 5,2,( s):
, ccAo-o �
• 1
Date Name Address .
'aL .: • .; cS '•V#'
S- 'c 77 �, �.�� • . a Nil - ,
• -g -• -- 71 i/10*// /r)e, 31 /c ‘v.74L.)
- . . la0e/ kb 6:."-•q).A •
.-•29"?7• • • „.4)e . • . /Zap • S6' 3,e* .fr. A o t>
• zee't v G c1 • /4 .s) r-ee
•
($J 2N/'-77. Oct • • 1L3y S ,'3 s-� 1Cjd7�o�-
c��� s • i rl
• 5V,?.1--/
��a• � � : I o ( c/#' . ®`yam.
�EDisQ
•• - f6" 26 .19(1
. �Nc .DES
; Bate r . Name • Ad• ess
. ,1/7-(;).__ 17 ril / . ailt . . i jer) b ,"*(/4-4 <,P0), /0: '''.
. ...S - i/- 0 " 4 /-li a/1/, /�crc-�S £4L/'.
, .. .-
I/1�k t:.u' . i ,iv' Zd ,i�,i. i '
A/11pr .�!� i,;Alin ' _ / 3 , ,& 7`
f)re.2../.14-1,d6'- '
' / A ' ' Sd �iQD, T: / l:.'t-;:.'1
'::',42-411s-'7/77 '
:.rgi_44-
_ ill
i if. .j
;',' 9.-: Z-J'. frfrti fi.iiftr)95gPv - ' '' ?) rt. :_ef ' /4;r1S(.2,
- . 1 7" . "..' *or
1 _8/ Y/ 77 . . .. ,. . 6 3 ^nl s-t- 4440.,
• ,$11
, . '•., _' f' _ .tom . ' ;5• 4 • !.
-1 '
�
a h / 7 7. I
, d+J� .,', _ ./. ',
�j j7;, l./:
r .fir. �� t 7:.'1::
' 4-../ '
. : I' 4 . P77-_, oi ,:.:46H ,-. L•:-;., .5i /.. : . ' ' ! '.--.':
: ,, , ,, ! -,• ,, , i .,, .
.:,..,„ . , : , . , .-47 /. 7 , .: ,, ....,, :. „,..:,. , .„:,
-.,p.. -,1 5—, :77 . .. :,- . ,e, . -,:: •, / 1
, : I ?, . 7. : t.",09',,7 , A.)./4 , :il irc, -.2
:g :• ,- S-1-7 . diA.LL,r' : . . i,--L . . : .. /),9 . . -S.:: , - 4' 12 d: ti'i,...: ':.
',:#..'..;4;:- i ..-7 ; ' : : ,4. .,1,-:0.4-,;(1:-. (1';.-;0Xta/' 1 - :'"..°/ 'A.4.44't -11 -'e ' ' 1-%'. Q'''. ..;:i
i eiiL
' . T 1 7 4 i,�t 1 0 6 ' ..:()" / mot.. AI L= S6' . .1,:iti-`4<i;
,:-:
et i---- " )--- -,.0-----f-- -4-4 -0. •
.-.:: ..' : :- : :.. ' :: --'. 4, ',4L, '''''' '\..: : ''':: ::-:, 5 '‘'-'), C';:( :1,:: 'IV.LiL c i:. :. : Z,
;..?-'4'.--- ' :7 :: : . 'A. 'i.g,',"./ .--; /.:'; ;4/4,tle_1 , '': ' -,ii/ '7:Z7;_ia'' . :e-c 4 ;,,c,12-?'--
q-,e -'11- : . .,e,-, :_,....,„:12.,,2,4P ra-t- - .,. ': v1-o AJ
��a0 /'1� i N �4vt �o l �K�-�
1 ` ,7 7 ' v. 11,7kzi-c,Q : 1 , Flo 5 , . G?:i).. r.v_: ' .
, 1 u SS C.V. ,...) .CI 6 .�: AN.., 0-.
:C.;-:- - 1 1 '1' ' a'. .11'/.1 :. 7 "iiA ' At )lio ::• L-7-. /6*/ ' ;'_L?/4/ &.-/ ) : .'!".'
- I- th _ /o
. • ,i 9.,_ 7 (lei ,. / ,2 j_611 AJ C.ic.iy,,S 6 fikv . ,:a
_Gf.-- S 7 7 6.6'e1Z ?.l. iL�L L4,j'. .i �3 ' 1_;..6 lY cr ' e�c .
ei•- * - :?7, :. . 'i c;difi-s ...t.;.;id-/)/ - ':',, ::- s' :: : ‘,6q. :..7L *.. Ain '-1'::; ..41;:::
)4/i: /.?.:., ,?' :q. :01 : i:: : :-. , : ,..
., (1...11, .. 7--7 i
, , , , . I,
P a r -- L
f-g _ � 7 G�;G��� / ,0 'mom% i 3 3� ,t �ret�i�� . -
,'J
j 1 . ,
' PETITION PAGE L . . . ' • . .
. . .
. . . . ,
.,� . . . _ . , .,
, . . . . . _
„ _
. ,
'.
.. DATE • . NAME, ADDRESS
' • / J_ . ' . sii- ad , S.
'i •-ill •.- '017 -.. ':' . (../_-,e: ' '''' ''-4,' ' . 'd, ' . -;:. .5- ,4‘.e._.' . . J. . -- , ..•- • .
. .• ....„
' - • .• .,'. ' .1.L : 4 ./ ...,.- . -fie -,.6.- O' .%-• ' ..' : • s.,7.. &,, / .a,4e -..cf - . . .:
7 • -: ,
• /J • • / ', /' / / ' • ‘5. :;- •
' , .
. 7 g / � I / , , , .st - .}( - i' , • / Jo . .%
! . • •',,-, ., :.- ' ; .. : _-d- ' , -:---4.-. -'-'- /4 '•_ alo, L_.. - P . . - -,c 0 ' 1:4 : 1 --.6(.6c.'":: •:-... ' ' .
:::: .. :::::::.'. . ':;4-. :6. 77..:::.'. ''':" • :1.*. ' LW .j. . ' ' .. • .'; 3
- '..1..: . .. ,•-.:s . -. ,..::: : ::. .' .
' .... ."-::: .,-,'...:.,..1.,:.: . ....-
'.'' -4' '''.• ."6!: , '-f- •,, ..,.: • :. '
. ... • .. •
,.. i ..r- j �.
•
AL
, .
..
,•1 .g. • :
„ -• • • ••• • .
- • ' r . . '•-, . ,--;-:. •-: -.,- , 1., .- r . , =.- 2 j o : „.2,-, .. . i.-...,'.. :::..,, ..i ., I
• ••' ::. ':•..: • •••-:::.: 4'..-;., L- 7:-•••,.,. "-,Lei;,e'r,..... , ./ . . :' .‘,
. ..� Ai :1:.: / 1; .. iterx :' ,. : .3 1 . 6i. :&t ,44�., .: .
1
/0..-:,'::: 3,5/
, d
., ..'''a:'/ .4r. / ' /,- ' '
': ' : . -''' ... V:3/1; : .`......ki .. , f, f. i ."(/' :,, - . S . , 5 . ' ,_ .•--e.-'7 / '(4i,_ '7NMP-e.-./r• -
qr/7, A1/.-7z %yre. : 4 : %t17 'oil,/,% , 'At v2' S,
.. . . : • 8' ./i p� A o • f '. : . .
. .
. . • - 1 . ,, ,c/1 _ . .90,E -=z.44.217:-.44 . S /�. . >"_,..., '
' '.'. ' '''''f'. ''. H. •.' '• : .,';'41—•-• '';- ''
/6 3'..' 6s . ./e-
.. _ �]0/0 - ' (.-,. • ei .Ni--4 ...;.•:. -
��-�-
-
,. ----_-.- ___.__„- - -v
t.,
j
•
•
•
_....T___.-r----,-_ _—.._..______-
•
- ..1.
'
✓yam ` l ' j ('/
•
. .7 '---,--e'V V____ i''' /- I ''' - 1 Z 2' ---53-----L-TS.
-,./-7--w-1-7, -.)/(,-- .1-,-,, -0. ,t6t
... ,i74„
ssaZi cf.cLH 3ul tiN 9 19Q
J; •
ry 7 ! I I l 7ri -7 _] Tri N 01t1 >I
KEAJTON HILL t i. i I I Im/)
'DATE
N 19rn E / [OD EE55
—5( t3 /71 ,
2 gutiAA-4?), .
v3p ibocL /4: forho 19 tie. 5
71/•3/77 3�d -
Al 7
7 4/-7‘a-v-e
/ ✓/ `,7 2 • ;; /w. 16c�
f
c761-i ', 07.air
/ e/e.
/ 7 3 F r
4:=7"--,ty&„
7 . •
12 �� j4,„1„&; G
=2/. owl' 3 \ .
e
7Y/
•
`7 •.� .!r ��7�{ ��� s!._ '.�`'1 •C /CI(j Ln (4— /'? i/
RENTON HILL PETITION
. .ail-`7 ..... t-w - -Q-� t_. •
. L '3 0
. e
(-4?
rt . . ......�.....I�..% .W.�1._. .... .,, _.__,._......_ ......_... ....... . ..3/ ...,._._ �_. . _..._....
if 1 v
Thor
•
•
.�.
VCR \\1 .0,
2,y,N ��
1 1
.
� '\ •q. We the undersigned residents and property owners of
it •
Cyr Renton Hill wish to express our opposition to the building (/3/
of any additional multiple dwellings at the upper end of am
.. J�
'd
Cedar Avenue South. We also oppose the zoning, planning
or building, of multiple dwellings or industrial concerns
in any other area of Renton Hill, or any adjacent area that
might require access or right of way through our community.
Our basic reasoning for the above opposition is that,
' . we 'are concerned about increased traffic, congestion , park-
ing problems, noise pollution , crime against personal property
and any other difficulties that arise from sudden large pop-
ulation • increases within a given community.
. We wish ' to make this opposition known to any' and all ' . - ---_.„
�
F. • �RF' �
interested parties. • ' r,F i'
• r
AUG 26 ,977
I A.
hate .. Name Address �74 ��/
,2 t Jam. ,�--
7'n--v-i' aip al
7—/7- t./..., 60 / .. -•P i 4 --
/ 7 7 7 La / �..•.„ . .. ��..- - S c� -
La:1 \47-\ . -----, .a.,,T,LA>,.
Al , // V R .',...„., ,,e.i - .
__0_,-,4..,:.. . Noo O ' 7/./ 1.-1• .P-'14. ?t7t, . •
7- Is--.1•-1 ---,:-•---A_CL---- , , Lt-i1/4- . , Ak\et.tc_2,6 . S),
Likt .
7://e i
7744, _.__��_ ,s3 J ,
V7/7 7 1t%, °-/ c A .,-i >,•. J .� iejt .-.,,r_ �►a-.--Ac1. .
77 �
.iv/ ,/., I :.J ,j /-3.7 )h - ;, ," c 9 i 6 ic"�-'12 !-tYJ�-.. a -ate- 7.< - .
Date
Name Address
'7 - /'�1 - 7 fl/
R-/8- 7 7 r�,l,�y41 4,i f 6o ! .Ri41ii 4Ve-. R,1/46,- .
-Mcw,.3
eogir) 120 9 L-09 n Aid- ab_e,u). -km„---/dp-
„4-2y - ?7 .r e er /333 C
i - F - ✓i . _ ✓_' Gz z/..4e.
8 -/r- 7 ' / .......„ • Ir. . di s; 0 - : axe., .g.•
r _
- �; � (� 4W _ :
s • ./..-, ' d i' ' /5.4 - 0,, ' 1. ,dd
eg•-/S- i;o - '_Ag,+ ► . 4 1 - - .I / -;
,....- Arrir :
7% SI - ( ' MANNY' ---.1:- 5 c 7 lid: ,d,
7 M 7� s
/7 _
_/ i - T 7 __ //i-A. 7 , C c y�L_ 5 C4 .a,e.,,,j" 1-.. d6<-
. _ I A , '7 7 _,� ) 532 6R.q.,--,,— i---4--, So
0- / 7 7 • S 3 GR.v,i..)r 4vim. Se),
8---- 16 - ? 7 Gr A f. ' ) 4 )5-di-e2, -0-r•- W 44_,ei.,„..__e ---j.--. -7e 4:_e,(_, / //5"-- a.-e_ i_-c,„.74.1._ ,Z2/,---1,/e ,Ye3
CS- I Y -- ri i ,� / -) fn q�/-�}'n
r G Co� f`�`Pf u r
f--/I--,72 /) ",
. /. 4oAe.,,,;/`c-,rJ G//Z .z.-d/4t
i ( 'I r " _?-1-Z.--%./..,2 tc:// .,, .'6_,IZ ' ./-_ _)
‘ lf-em (A-Ite) I .; i 14 S 7 r-4*-C `r €/),/
v _ i (; - 7 71/0,a_er --e A p ry 13 /y — se ? (Jy
, •
. .
• '
. , .
. NI
. ! . . . , . . . . .,. .
9c.r0 :- irr - .: . 1, L___. )-L.-. ; •
?,t7v. 67.-s- zill/27 • >-Y` .-., -1',-,2- : . • ,- • 4 Z 7 /-r.- -7.
. • . . , s- -) e• . 7.- ii.tv '- 4. 2_5. .. . 7.--ee2T-, -• .:-.
/•"-ii ' 7' --# , ,-Yr , ' ., .b 6.c. • . em-.... - . rr- -.7... •,-- ..• . - ....I Z. L.;
' ., •:, -. L.) . 1,.. -(4, . • - 2- c,., ' . - ... :: yrai sr .e, i,.-- It
\ . . • ,.,... 3 ?r79 N,A-2IA-4/ °I€ ' • Ill- '-?-q (I'? . c,Q. . t?-7-7--!-P' -'- ' 6 6 - 1-ei
- • : ..z. . p . '. .4!" Or,.. -04.0 c7.( :" . . ' i • -7 cr .. ---. 7.-- -IF:4-1, i • . .-c. --. /2..-.. 7
.. '• • : - :- "'.r . :;,. P 12.---7,!-F .• 1 ': -• : • <71ffiel-7:•: R- ' A. //... /./iii
. . . .. , .. -.--- • - • , ' a.
, • • . , J •, ': f•-t?2 .slt_'.147-€'7— .! ,(/ F ,.,.7 .. ' _,(-7 ..,--, ,•;,,--‘2, _.: / . 4 -6 :-/7, .0,.
• : , '•74, . -?--v:)-?, y. /. E : ... , ' P. ., ...o •.-,,C
• • ' '7 : ?,-.1-.),p ee.y ,Es- ;;PYr.(77 l'-v..'reA2', --",7T :' :'L e-./. / ?;/.7. .
77 ,..?.7 . 1- . Yll-1- i.'Y .45r7r. --7 • --. -.'- `L'-'3. •• .7'- '.'"7X-' 4 4 , ( 1,70er.
'.. :.. ' . - . - - • 67 E • • • i : ' . ,• '• ' . ' • - '.' • -• •
.• - a-i. ,-7,-2....2 i"--.,,..1-7,:: , ,i_./ 4:•,,,. ,- . , -7-0--
,-r, IT•2- 7.1.
. :. .---/•° .77 "j;:/j, . 77,:) . , iii ,. •Ap •'./i/Z ...., iz 7-zi:
"Cs,' - (1i7 'tAert-6-#7 • • '--F : '" " is.f 1
1.. ' °°' ' . . !f'.. - 4 ... -AI- .7.
.• .. . .'.c?. .,:-. :. .,. . ,.. ... .. ,s - i . . . ir-,. -:. -,-.7v ,_,
-.T . . .. ( .1„ -L.t . -
,, ,, ,,,,,yr
s -?,-,7 .. . , . _5s_54 . - a-v-Yr- ' -7:7" - ', ...u44' . 4 L. -zt --j'.•-
• . : . .;. .. / -..r . .( .- . . , ,•.,- . ..,_ 71". . t 4 -4 / -
( zc27
7 .(,---;,,-.. v //.2?)/7/;- 2, :2.
--- ,.._.-7-1 .Tc ,----p.t.„- - . L b •-- ( :--,-,(1,A.
• ----Z--5•>. /Wi• • , ,.. 7' ' .-- -: ,- .. - ..' ..4-L - L-'- i4
1(4 . 43 . • ' i ,
• -.-.- •° - (4. -1,- I. .( =
•
. , =-7-0 . .."r' ZG's.' • - , -. .
P
---;-- PS. Siq.' , - ' . ' % 03. ‘ • . CC 1,./IT- .
.: '. 7 (7mv • --- ,/ e16 e 7° 1,13)14,
- ______ • 95 Twil)--lkal- ), Sno . 0- tA \ l'rryln
)) 16, u Li. -CT.:7
. . . sseappy • . . atuBN 'ger - •
. eq.Bcr
„
L- • . I •
DE:ce Name .r Address _
at /6 • 7.7 .a_ 'i j . fo o 2- ,P4i+17- JO .
r, J. , . . g - -- .--1_ r.
a " "1 i L L. i, C. -7 C3a,(2) `7 �if t
" " " %-Pi'cvlAiAL- .CF*2e _, . k ,, _
h ' ' ' " nradiA,' )t CaiiieLJ q 0 0 ',4____J21. .
4 G /11.� ��//d� /0 0'.-- 1q I Apt •s(3`
" armeeR A / 1 1 t9Yl atkez44,. /C0 0 9 l el /TUB , ge, ,
i g ; ; , , • , 4 i -- oz )7, , ,0,3 411 - ,..-Z .:
00
e ,k'-/772 `V__A, I .,7 4 PA..✓ /no 9 .7K ' •
e4u -ems ' - ' , i� t L2-t.te
. ', ,
2 - jR 7 .7 5 / .a h
$ ` 1 -77 o_ AWEann� )
" , 61,o - &4:
I / k- '7 7 ., ►�. . ;fey; ' I
- (s-7 7 ,_ 2 770 '.4 %` 5 ,
" l $ - -? 7 d1G- o lQ k, J ; Cf i 6r n*C.
_ 14 -71 4,0- -c./,i,`4 2 -ri qQ. ,1,,,�,�,►, ()- :.
' t/-. ./t/-: 17 . e . A_ : 6. c -
L-------
ei,
$_ Z '' 7 ? Iit i�.r" ui1,r '7 0 ' " �e� -,, l:�t,+e ,.
w =aq - 77 bi.Attk-) 70� �Nw -'��. ,
q'- a-4 - 7i .c. 72/ �� z: 7 / e t aS3. "
y'-?s� •-77 ' ' F' �. �P ggoy I.�-. - a,.,,, 4,
8- 2A, - '77 , a4A $off (n/1 p 191e z, Sr.,
f Y - 77 171 j> . Y/./_h a44 2c -
Ge ,..r/g-ve. --g. Pe-,,.4.
.8-,..-Iit,1-7 , /„Lyae,a-,&,.„ , go C . ;*?,-)4-vf 5.6 , ,e,e7lort .
r- V 77 . LA‘,e4 aZ4i-z-- J -- �— .- ,
3,-ALQ.,..ja_._:,./Ai,egi. ,. // _ of
. . . , 4:4
/t \ /
. (41"" ' - ' ' Cd---:-L—'__,
Date • Name Address
0- `t/ 17 da' ' i . / L4i 7/S- .04a
T Ili- 77 ,'eA:I�% c /3,4 �-..J 7
14 9/77 7/ogit97, z ,N� As_L-_?...y -7 7 4 '°G -..�t�.a.e /QL-' so
5) J y - 7 7 , 'W 7.a i-e-77- gyL— 4" .7"G ,. -/6/
-24- 7 7 9 y Alt-fr .�-
-;q- 71 . y. A d 1). , +I_,tv...
4,i,L( - xo .
`t 7? 4 % - 74, , i
(JELLY_ -_-_,22___. - ' ,.-eitoo.y.r-.f,-,wor ef'14/ - Aee,f_V OM IA ,
5 .t( — 77. 7���e A • ,!J.2 _,C..(/�.r,� 7 a 7 .Y cgar�• -X),
_-- 2 - 71 x / 7.42_ 'i4 A-oe_ so_
r-144 , 1 ) te,0Z /1-/I 70/ ii.ytakr ,go
g411- 22 ,de/)_ irpc74-- 4-0-g-d---- 791 /f I i 14- a,t_p_Jt
8- a5-gri bail eak& .. 8 t anon 3rrr.c eh
e--..zs- 2--) -ka„ ./.4.2.,,ck Alp,AL=A . /Y „,.„ ‘.(iie 0.0 • '
OQ
�b?S -y 7 ' d 9 .
11-4.5- 77 ../ 7/% 0 ,
Q77 \,: / 5,a - c .
aS- ? 4 . • //-0-/-4-4.4/4 /3 6 2v J '. /eo �
-77 e ,ram, . 6 l 74 �. . _)
I -� '
� 77 0,( SQay i� /a 0ee . 5n .
a al- 1 acibkici, Y5LidA.-L-4.1
N 5e014 lib th. 0 U c C
1-ZS 77 ,d 4 C' .v /..16x 5/..I'e. 1 in) eX i 04m,--ciy 1;►
g= .7.5- 77 *lila,444.irkaila. pc . .:do_ to-►;�, ,
S-0.75 -7'7 Ath ci . e euri 21Z/qdx-w.,,,a) ).
g..,2,--o9 47„..;_ / _ cx ri.)?-2-4, &E, '
g - — , , a_5,...A-Lek_ (0,0
Lx,,,,a 5, xf.As) ----
(p te-lai) I '
•
Date Name Address
�JP '7 as %/(: V �/ 1� •1(e=:) titL24)
E- $/- .Ya N l/ --c c. 6‘e. zio-7‘%
g - a - 77 � t •/Z)v.A./Moei //,L
4.\-„D-L/ -7 I ' /Joe/
V` 77 /I -Qie..e4v C-�' . .U!E' df.GGy2V 5, KC.?Yc_J L�Zc��c� 2?l6T-7,
•
v. A
1y/ 77 fri.clrt •143 ,1 s-�- dl�vf1 •
c7-/- 1'): /.-2n-6
F(/\2s/1 7 ;)e..11� ) DCc...r?-E'(7 ,1LC /0-0 0.0 • .�rd ,�.P i'1 I)'7,
.5(/ / 77 1, , `t3 ? , :
17 • 12-cridAll 7,l6 3 2_,)
P., y- • 7.7. /,a . • d 2 (P.p�r�4 ,(2/�
•
g2 S- 7-1 (4, 4-_ .�. nr-.la /), _ S . r ��' jzjii .
R�
r, kb
AUG 26 1911
44/
•
NG DES/
d.
-,-
.= Date
Name 4411 Ad ess
1/—P- '7 ,ram/, , , j,' 1•.V :Pol-
. ..1 c 77 , i. it dd.///l lAti-cs Zge__
' l
g - a - 7� , � � Pi� `�Zw ;// .5 /d
—77 , -•:1 4 a - 3 ��
_- V/-7 x j1, 3' 56• / 3,eD r. i
i. (44- '7 & .0 0. c&� 4-6 ,y i iti-ec.41
7 7 masioe,If, ,J_ - /�'/l ,d e
--i/ ,_z1 • ,„ . #114, . zau ,, ,,, c3tfil-Y4f#S(4:t
/ 'II " .
/ " 143 5 3 cad. s-l- , ,��i
Sr/a$/'77 ' .1 , l . 1 .5. � r, /.
l , 6 QCc� %DEC) ' '5 4o . ,4rCJ . ,eQ1 J? 7
!
/ J/. "J ( 7 - X/ice ' `'2 ' t / e j V 7 \. a-l dli/. ',o i'
/1s - 7? 1)11 /io 7 46 3 u1 S. -
V.-' / 5"-- 77 r , . f. , "" a _7 ,,a,cb- Ae. a ' , jet. ..-,5',
K -7 � 1 4F 1 & 122 . S . 4 00. .. :
# 4, ,s--, .7 qc-1 aio c . ' ,
cf. c - 1"7 1ie— i Q to] :A144, , Z. rrt
T. - 7 `? iia.ak 0 fref--5 - 0/ /iii ,V,74 AVc 5o fk.: ;V:0
- ,a,t_.:1-,: 9/ o , _,,4 -i-t- e‘Ya\z„ ,c7,0_,......zti_Al..4
` L " B l G \
7- - J .d.&,-L--47-47-d>tM
7 jai 7 ;
9- B -- 7 7 h/Q2 o. firiv toN h v� §'o REK G : �
Qi - - 7 7 Q `D ; 1° s a.0-c c,�,
C\- .:‘ \\\) .,..ty.....\\)\,-v,-t_k --. __\., _.7.--!,,,,-Nc.v. ,.,.) (.1 (.1 '5 c' .:), k-14_2\-\_k__,_, c\)„_\..2&c.) , -Th ' Til
/ r
(i— / , aeKVYN LjY\ --.A,( 0. d-76----/ .-'4,16,/a14, /7 . .7
j__.2 /2 9 ,i,44,,,e-ierpti 4, ba.,,,-1,2.a. i . - g,a--( . -.,
C - 9 • q 3 U ten-t( Lc. " 5 a- , , .
G% ,c 1/
_, 3 6 .211 .6)(i _ , ,ere,14,__ 2
`r- k - 77 �:ei_b 4 1`3: �'c 1 d2s e, d, . ,1 -�-
,_� -7 ? , ., 1910 GV f'
I , . , . .. . .
e •
. lis,
. r_. .
PETITION PAGE ,9
��D/ATE NAME ADDRESS
/�/ / .,. _ . • . Ste 6'a64 ' S.
- 0:./5-7 Gt �• % . 5- '4/ ..
w i.' -,7 ki, Gi
3 7 ' . -17. / 'i ''! //// ' , .5.
,� r . 'a- 4 _ 1 • _ -st 3 - /, . / .Jo .
/j/ ' �i l�_ / ._, �! 5 /0 1 A A c
A 77 . gi
� - c 3 . 0 _ , , � -
C
L (L..r Alt �/ I S effitQ.';
64 ._)Z. ' . / ..1 .0-r- f f) ;.• 7 1 , '... , __-ch6‹ ji .
4/-
? "ilitio 0 /4 _ -u7 cF0.41 ci- s
4A/mm 1 /,, ilex ' • &3i 7 atak
i,/1 I ' '/ � i , .3_5/ 4 /- ' ,, f
w 3 l 7 . , " . / fl / .c • ' S, -,,l '/ 67, -,,,....- ,,
6 0 /4-//.0 •/LW' , i. ,37 •/T/1iie Awe c.
. ,g /0. -/1/, Aro -5- ,
er z.za ; ; . 7 C - .,-
---- ,,, z74--e J d
,?Je).7-z,„.‘,.._.z.,.. ,_..fc_______
44,-(t-- 9264; ,e,,,,t„,-/ 903 6,-_______,,,,t74- 4..?,, ,. ii, f;;-_,„
/- -
d3 6 rr a S. - te-,04k
j /. .,,„ •S• ,
/_l ji ,,d6
yaii--)_
fi) ga,,,,, )4 c --k ,,„. ,
,53 /(}6-
��r .� �c . /3_5: y5r►--Aiti ilL,,,, SD
Re-Arco f-a-L L i-)E.- /-- 1 i 1 ( ILI
. ,.
.. .. e
.. .
-I) Fl T E N p ni E . •
AT)D R. E• 5,5
_ .
.._.._ ____.......____ .
ZI
----------- --
/ • I .------- .4 c."4.%.-... 5'0,
. .
- ---_---- .
' . .
-.___-- ' •.
. .
. .
.. .
. . • '
. . .
. .
. .
. .
.......______________ . ' •
. 1 . . .
. .
...._..______. I . • . .
1 _____ . . - •
. .
. .
, .
. . .
. -
•
! . . .
. . .
. .
; .
i , • . .
. .
. .
. .. .. .
• .
.• . •-, -
1 i . . • _
. .1 . . .
. . . • ,
. . . .
, .
1 . .
,... _
- • .
. .
. .
, •, , __________.______—__. ,
. i
• .
. .
. . '
. . .. .... .. .
, .
, •. ,
. ..... ..
. .
.. . .
. .
. , ,___•_________.____:._----.__
...
....._
..._.._____________________----7------- ..-
. . ......_......__________
.....- . .
•
-,--- .
................____. .
.. . ,
. . . __. . .
. .
. ____—_-L------------:----- .--
___._.___.______.__.
, ... . _•_.. _.._-.
, . . .
. . -
. .
. . .
. .
. . . .
. .
. .
. .
. •
- . • ,
. . ..
. . ,
. . .
. .
. .. .
. . .. •
. . .
. . .
. .
. . . . .
, . . . .
•• . . .
. . .
.. • . .
. ,
. . .
. .
. •
. .
. . . , .
. . .
, .
. . . . . .
. .
. .
. . • .
, . .
. . .
. . .
. .
. .
. .
. . .
. , •
. . .
. .
. . .
. .
. •
• . . , • •
. .
. .
. , .
. .
. . . .
. . . .
, . . . .
. .
. . .
. .
. . • . .
, . .
. .
. .
. . . .
. .
. .
gENT ON HILL It- 1 10A1
-1)Frre Nfirn E
DD/ZE5-5
/,e _2.992 ' .... •
iu cl . by) (ieviAA 2 0 au t•A
v3/77 it200a v21
/ -
77 itt.(447, ?did
py
`g/a/' /7 2 • /303 te-v.
9//9/7 • rkia44.4 ,r)-tca( joef
'17
ji'41"-)i 419e,(c/ dte. ,
4r-71-94/o---iz •
.°
y- /±77
—77 _eAsLig
iv" ,57:=.7 (c1 Po ti<
z;edfraK. de•47,4!
g 3e cti/s
9; /0/57-ofr/-4,s
• ± :C4:;/7/4 ;"t/ /It!'//-Z L6-. 5_4- •
pfit ,/ 77
. .
. ,
•
• .
(Jr 2 • , ..)
•-/
61- tr),.)
c•1 "
I ( '.\(:ivv\C\y_) :2!) i \'(
•
•
I,
RENTON HILL PETITION
I •
51)r.Pi' •.7.• 7 •.. l•Cit',1A'A 1•, •Th.4 7 1.R• 1 A)• 4•cy- -• 3 ..'7 0 fl. . --... 4j6-4- 4--7•V' ....,...
0. ...4a...... 77 g/f
...1__...!„..T............., ,......._ ... ......
ri -3/.7 /r---„...„&„... ...&,=.. -_,..____5......______........_..... ...... ..
•
.0/ / . .---4. ........7.__...... ........._..:::_,
ire
aii. 7 r el #r Xit...• g''%°• ..._. ......... ......
,... • •
. . „•
... ............ .. .....
• 104" ....-- eoz;:ipx , 0 ir.....1 c r:7. ... 4 „.. ..4_,
..._ ..._
. _ .
. ... .
, .
. . ..
., _
, . .. .. . .
, ....... . , .. _
_ , ... .
,. . . .._ ....... . .
. (---6-v.
. . .. ... . „ ..
, is....,
if_ t lEti 0' .. _., ....,. ... . .. .
- /......
. . .. .. •sEp .i5, 1971 . ..._
•
. .. . . .. ... .
, . , . .. , .... ..
*
- "
_ . .. ....
. . .
. .
. ,
, .
. .
, .
. ,
. .
, .
. ,
. ,
. . .
, .
. ,
. .
- ,
-,.
,
We the undersigned residents and property owners of
Renton Hill wish to ,express our, opposition to the bulding
of any additional multiple dwellings at the upper end of
/4,
Cedar Avenue South. We also oppose the zoning, planning
or building of multiple dwellings or industrial concerns
in any other area of Renton Fill, or any adjacent area that
might reouire access or right of way through our community.
Our basic reasoning for the above opposition is that
we are concerned about increased traffic, congestion , park-
lnp. problems, noise pollution , crime against personal property
and any other difficulties that arise from sudden large pop-
ulation increases within a given community.
We wish to make this opposition known to any and all
interested parties.
1:--'.,
if AI q's., ,'26 1•37-1 ,!:
Nam . Address
\ 4„,
-
-/j- 7 7 ''-'6'e;'Le'1../2r:L.. .„-L C---7 7 - ,..Z...,,_ .), 1., ,-,
------
i /
/e /I 77 '''ifiZY eff ' .2.•;?': •'' •''. 1 7fiZi• ‘174 al'te---'1.,ft,
7 /
/7.- i?)2
4.4,
..., ,,,, ,- _., ...7,,,LL-114-14 , ' ''3/
/ ) I
-.70., / ed-, / ze S
...s......1
7 7 44 of,-,. e,e,../ 4.../.,C.,./ ...--.1. :
------,-,-,--:.,
.
wavenes.,mamtnannowasumnErwrommewstm""`. '
L ci/
/
( —7 ----
immia6)(1)
FIMMI147
We .--<ld-/7 ,,,
i
,
j•..r.7
---, . —,------,4-1
/
I __, .L .J.-- &-!..34-11-.1-'''' S63 ,3-2 , 6/41,, .
/' c-7,
4:21: 7,- a , , •'''' '
/J' / ' • / ,
• l'? '7.•••• :/ • i — - ,.. ( , 'Y''il '
!
• ' _.1 V
',---,/ .!„,,„_•_-rt. 7.7-,1 ''',k'•''-/'1---78,;rL,_
d/,./ i i ' /- ' A i .•
•
' fir
tj,y,, _ -, ,.', .
. Date.
---,-7„.... Arame Address
_
-72
• •
-7
- '/`f - 7 1 • l •‘" .� 1 C e J�, . .lip 'l l..l /7- .
" �
R- )5-- ?7 l4/ 609 C P/4/u7 4-v c
7)4 Zpo 9 util) (),,,yd---C2/z.w.klk: -.30, 7'A-34y,
I
/y a i 13,33 a a7t-` t'/ ] ,
` IC q(/ 1,i,/ . r �e a (
. g^ -rs - 77 )----"--7,1, -_7 le " ..! --C- iy�zS � � a
1 CV/Le/act-a [ A- iqci c/.]ate'' V!W V •f4 4'G.e c., C >.
-'• ( '6. f '7'7 1/A4/L E-‘
r r y
.e .'/ - 77 l �1 �Y i s ":� S�- S. ��
-/��jj -:)7 - -2--,.-r- A—6/ /is-i7- S 6 .z.-%' ‘,7 ' .
4"- IP- 77 Aed..-.1,1,5 6)../i ' ' ‘id' 'J. (2_,,u4. U, : ' ,,,H. • ,
ics_ts,_ 2? (.,..0,12 ..., r y i•. T.......: ,
'7
/
'/ r
/- &p d.-7 s -. -•.---. .', . . . ...':
. ,--m 77 i\„,_1,11 aeJ. )
'''S' /- . iy:/6, 5 ,(71-Lj-. .
,(_11.) , . • r7/o - ,5-- 7 Fedi---- , ..,:. -..i. ,..:,:.
-/i 7 7 '�-n�� 4-yam t-e)Lr .._0 •'' ' '',: ,',' '
S- /A - 7 " . d ✓ 372 6A--,.? ,- /ir-- -'. So
--./ . 7 7 .�-e: f�- J /33.2 -:za,�'r /,I�:e'• ;S'o.
-/,‘?"- 7 L 4.e„,-,---F' inC e�!Ci -- f// -C-4'-2 4' ' ''
8 L .2 -1 Gr 14 / , -e- 1A- ?A 1 ..
�• - I r _ '7ri 0 ut, C 7-7ccc 7_S._ A 4`1r'/Yr"!'FYI [.UC7e/ 'ca l'�e�47i, , -
I - 7 7 ti- .c i.-►:�:;i- ./ i D t .6 "r_r /� ..
•
•>_ _ •:' • • , - • '.:i:.1-.J�;} dS'R, •I'll.
Date
Name' Address "9�°'' '
.. i.1.''-„J.'. ,.'1:'
•
-,�' Mgr 7-'7 7 • . �' - `Y :% ./ . ,.. .,_.. :' . 0P ��- S
;; ,-'. ....!. - 7 • w 'l a� , ' ;4;
..-2t,. ?'...:.t'' :.1 7 .•1!)e), . ....,:, . . L-.•••''k Nkbi 0 • ,' . ./...- -.:,. . •r.,. _, ., , . .
„,.....„/ (24.___a , ,, ,,,r..... . ,,,,,,,....„,. . ,..,.
. ...:,,,‘,...., .,, ,/ _ 77 , ... ., ,...,,, A-s.•?-t •
_4-pt.-CZ:La' . ,
- ,•_';:':•'i.-,..:':1 ?..,-... ).7„,.1 /7 ., • . .- ...., ._.
__ , - , ..-• - .7e) - P .-_-,(2LT/5------1/a,‘/, -':'
3 :.`� ; f 7 • T G �,•/'.:':?n3,,'._( " Ch Z..,� • -&%'-cep'- � .
'. �:' tea.-.
•
: . ���
';i `y .. '11irr ..
.„.,f / 7 7 7' - t
:; :. � : .•3s Cie_ '`'
5
p,
•p p ,.
•
. .,
,1.. . �j '� ' ��' ':..•''''....
^J' p . •_ .. ,.. SAS -� r G Sd .::6 -,j isi
„`,'‘..,
, : ... ,L,,,;.., ,
ti' /7� 7 , .. '" :r .„. ,, �'i �-C'� ' �/. , • `'' '! ' '1r
•
{,,,.•'.Y', � .i.� 1 //` (/ ./� �%. ,. Jr. '<'.:,' 'V /-ge-la—�.�/ (.`- V—'_'rfr{i.. '4 hi;,.' .rl,j';;j)1. :'
il•fi•I i1/{ I _ � <J: ... _,J p� r � ;! .f„Jt: '1.,:•Fin•
,:r:'Y! •Y7- V:.'/ �// • i7,''F: - - L{ >' /�t f2 C -C.-G�� t�D r' r i.:'r•I i •�„r
I,°'`' ,
• ''''V/c/_-//-7 7. ... ' -1,, ,i4.11, - rk,,--.., • .
it • ,:.!::vt
`•yR,." �, / / � •li�f V�/ T. '� . , .iF �J / � •, .(, ,+j�.�: �� � '� ., .i:: '1...,=..d,,'iri.
.'.:7,'-r- '' , et.. ,
E'Ji' • elt IE.. 1„•:
•
•
•
ry et• 1 ay.'" ''' ;'7 : ;;�•,,�,+G"'- ii, r � �- ..`-•'•��.1w:fi:- 4� �- ;, ; , .i,: ' •+:r'M � - r
2.7
01,
l �?�! - ';,. ;, J i'��. °"1 `,I•'hili'r (..: ' r:i h'4,� 'lt!,+.gk >.,. /' '� ' '°(ly � M,�!. : 1{
. . ,i
•„r t', ,i,,,,,.::ram .., :,'r;: ':Q
.:''.:..:::.:4>':.:. ..21' i.....' . i....'' '',..3,...'''''''::1 .. ... ,.....1'!'..','::,,.'k',,,''..'.ili;.'PZ7(71,i):'. :'; t,"2:72,9::::.,;.;.• ••• - - • • -.• •-'- eip-,•:.ft.,/ :. ',...,.,y.;!.. i1,•,.1.,.%.,•-1-;'.:,.•
:rl
1' , i1' r
" • . ,1 '%'1
ram! • •
I,.
5'''ail• �1V ''1 I ai
�17..
•
h,
,I r. +tr�,
'{7i r
- ,• tip: • i�••,:'' • I .'1:;,i'�', ...1f P.
11
t
'.Nr.•�. • 5
'd3'' ';l'.in; ,r
Name` ;.,A.ddress _ . . Al..-,.-:.
r' f
'I`I
P •
IYY :. . )12ipte.:00ye :j.":..-. :: 'qP 0 .•" ,af___ .."•;' •
„{+I, ,-F ` • 4 • a ; . . " `/0 d'-'. WIZ AUK ,c.- C3,4 '',
n„,Q.0_,:k fa ,*. ,.. • , , :iii.44:.:-. j,,9 ,_ ... /,,,,,e ..,xio . ,...g.,„,..,. .-:.:,.,,,,:,,,,,.,..i.;,.:: -,..-
...:
a,_e-..
,. ...
,.. •_ � ` '
.... , .
..,..,..,..,....,e . .
, r
$° $ ,..,14_ '. ...,/ �I .. ', -ice &"eha •••
•
ii0_f.?
-
. .,",
;'
1,,,-1.i.1:....J.k....-.-7 7 p .. : •;- '•.•• •, • .,_•:•• .,ce,tir„..--•,..•..,..!,•y,-;• .••90 .• . . .. .... .. . .
7 •_• , ,�;�% 8 7 �1� .=>" . .. is �' �;�' �5::�:.'. -�'' . _
-� 77 ter.�• Q ....r tiu j
:'''''':' .-:' 2.k: : 'I 7 .• -• '''•':f: .'-',.'•'.'-'•-•'''.. H: '•':":"'"'7' .••'-'•••:'.•;"--'...'...'-' - .:.••,••• .•-•':.. cis., -/
( . -r.._•_ - . .•••-_-. . ,.':., .- . , • -. • • .. .: .. ., • - ... . :-' ..• ..• ' :.=....:•••• ...,..,...••:..',...L.,:...',..;
: -;,:,...! -.2-11-- . .7 -7 )/,,,2" ' r.,-('''•' . •' Ct-%;t:i' -.6.A...,—*.-- ‘•••••';'•••• .::.': -, 1'013 • :. .,44 L.-rt.-ir • (;(1--e-/e.1:=-2 ' . '•-•;.'"•••'!;.''''.'''":-r,i,',:,'1. ,
:....., .0''7'62-,q - .7 7 -' ;° .. . ?0'8 slit` dw (,(,(,( -'',�o =;f?:;;:': ',
-;,•; ''-7-4. '-' .-/ 1 - ti.,•4:44,47L., z,.;..,'7-i7. • ,•,- , ...46-_,•• ,. :,,,,,-../;,,,.. _,,:,,::.7 i .,,- ,i_jr,4_,,, ;arta-, _s r v.,.. ,:,...,-...,,..,,,,-,,;:....,:,,,,,,,:.4,,,,.,,,:, .
!Y '•
7 � ,
T / / /J I.. , (iC f, iice
/ / ve j:,
�'�:''� ''il'•'• 1[ ..
r,• � ••,5`''�, 'O U�+• '•• ��%f L.d� /f'i/�`.�.i i-,t,,-T.
,- - 7(1 gyp
''',..i': d,'y 1i? ---'1 -).1-ti -v-
._ 1��•h::,:'� ill. r�l:
7`tt:�` '' _ 1_'' ' -. 1r f, A j 1 'S' t�,le,lr ,II'+••
1.
Date' Names_ Address
..,-.;.....„ -. / /Nip, ..,' ..'..-..... . . 40, • ,, •i„; ,..., .,- - .
:,'''.' .. 74 9177 y . . --, ..:. .,
i .
. 7/ . sA.,147-a-/AeL. ..,/i4-.-,, .
;, c;.7v ^�/J�2 -a/Lei' 'if'/L1-G(:-'Ct1.__- 4/� J�/, � w �iG,
-� - 77 �� 1C1�.� , . Y G T3 11
..r ;/1/ /' /.•l'--9- ...,a , •e�y,._ r I- ,y/( .
..-
7
_ 7 _
': -' ?�� , /� vim- �a. . _:. ,.
." : -�.9 - ? �:'; 7,., 7,% �,/ I Cuc, o, . • , ,. , . ,
S, ? 'L/ G :',:', ..r '„i fi, Mgt[ 'e,f'• ao c 1 S ... .1:-i.{ ..
•
8, Q5-171 '`Ea -ban ' -. a t ::: :- A;, ''e �5 m' rye. > rrr.c i. :a;l::LL, .
I{"` '•�r'� )' lild 4(k t A1JI R/L: d // / Q✓) .• (� I ;}' Y, -g.i;;::,7i
tl.f .( ,4 . 'r' I - J' `i/ �,' .. ' ' .r i' . `.•<u;-' 1_r l •-'�_a- -1A 21..�._(/ , i o'1• 1 /' '' '! u �4''
r.. 0
-..-'4?:::, ''. .IP ._1/4_. -,'. '; ' ' . .. rffillift...-.A,. ,L,.,:_:. -k . - ......,,i-.,...,, ,,, .' (..) .".:.,•1. , -,., -A'(":-.", ' .'..' ','..,,';'::-.'..;0,:".,,-A'VN,`:-.71C.1',.,,,;.,:i
`67r-•.,,"7 7 , j _ - ,•��:'-x I 7ir::
;:+t`Cyy� .,,..;. p.:,.' :f...0757`' ?'47 .
• Ind : '- -
`
•
' � I•ti
'�' '.: ie.t.,: - � , 4 ' .f�r fi` :.4� ''il,:: � ii�„?i+tiit,i%}:.t.
;•i�. i n .el'
=„� ,.lu+'•
`t � ;Y .
^� '�A. � j -- '},-i�•�I;; . .:�i,`.-.'I'h.:�I: y;}-1 1, .lry,J, •y 'r1J�'r k `
` . i
4.4
•
"f'
•
F •`F.
'• • • ,' :x; nPl : '
�
I
+ •
• • 'i� s• kiii,,�1
.;m'i at: , .. ...t� _•`r :/' �'::r' ,a. ' '?:,,}::$:iCfj.6:"':c•
1. f,'. 1,4
;
, 1 I
f
•
•
. • • •,
'.N
wi`,
Day' - :+,;.
t .,
r Name' s
„
y� 'fft 1-• -
rj.
•}r
ail
r^ • i
7 G /
4
",,,./ 4/ - ` 'ICI'- . :b. — ! '�' r ...
•V.
£;T'3!`; ra2y, 7 : ,." :; .. Via.: ', .`S6 - ;.C'r,.• .
;�' ..
. :
;1; .1 '' /7 • �' .� ' jnit t, j,Z3 tj '' 5� ,j ,:s t 1.d ? O11 ,
• , � ~` 1 4 'S _ j � , if : ; ', ,',._, !J' � �
I:DIc:Qe fL ;,! _ .o ; Ord ., 'H;-. Ar77O: : � s :
•
./,.~ - •�`� ::e•.. fry`=i , . :; % a 5 ' � . '` ' 'f+� ; -,;:' Il
-.., ,, w'.7 '9 •J,' O ,•• �� •��. ;fit/ • J�: � x� l;
J +/�
71.
c•
.4{Il'
•'rr 5 J
•
n,
,.' !, . ,i(n. Ptr :-'Ye'_•.c ;,i;'VL+'Gv::,S.
:I^;..,':'.f. _ ',,'I_ .,•f• •ll,.,- , ':5'::, ,:1�.:;w:,Y1r'e:�i}+r:.l•
f!a • ,f - • ,s a
1'
1 1 1!.
Y'
1
"�. .,,r
•"ty$
,
-s
,r.
�a
• /� p�*
'4,
l•ls'
r_ d•i•
i1, • p5y.
I+
} !
I
1.:.
;:fq
:�it
„-rrrr<'r'-
.r."'i
i
. 't? :
t -.'y6J
- `
.
�
r
.•t
• `Mi' t � 7; - ".46' � as •rr • I,ir r.''t''�t h i r' I
2.
L.t y
W.,
1
,
rw.
Y �
Ar ;ti"'.
`V '
"'T
E r7lr;
� ' �.i:.
t" •1 il,
vR 3":
11
+t
�1'
,;p;5 ¢ _
.--r.
i'
,
1,(n
. - - - _ '1' ., � - ���'' •r'' i,a' .Lq;1,1,
Date / _ ,r• _ _ N am e lr �»., r e s s
' — -/7'7. a, ;%' i/(R. 6 - 24- .
. ... F - ��7/77 r ,�•q; . le. - -96 4i ll1 -
'. c.) ,/ g / 77• i Ir P GI /4v /,�i/t:i ;3j6.
1 DS/ —7 T/ fUZ -/ x ? .s . ,r 3 � �:
rf Z q r 7 /1_) / '• L _ ,/i l /1 /2 3' S6 3Rb S.7. T.• /'�� 1T '
��- ,!� i 1a• e.h ) 0. .l& sf.(�y ac) /fie .4) 14►-cc.a) J � . nr. s';,
J / y r -1/ - • ! �/` -J'`,.4 czT4L 4 ._ 1/. L-
/ / �, 2, 3 ?''Jg('
'
/ If f
,'
9"1/_ /")7/ -r-,?z,/,j„,,,d4;:___?
/ , ' — , -. 6/"V_67kli. ./,2 e5 de_,--V-e-,ed'it;
S�:zS//r7) ,q6_Y OCCL1(% n f/ /04,5 , o • ;(rci ', Pe�1 �l?2�
/ /
/ 1 1, :// 7 7 ; J t?.? d. -c.r' '-y/�l.�1 f t 2--1-6.-2 / d V 7 "}1,• 3_,,_ • 7, P rJ 1-:
ilS
"; 5 72 // ',L .4'77, �l ;,�a 7 6 _ u St- / .
/ ._:: [
P- 1-- 7 -7./ //71‘Z i 2,Z/9 7-,7,- 1 i /I _," 0 r.?( ('''s,‘)e6'//:7-' /e i 47 j j,- /1;7,4 77,-,.'-.
,�J f l�1_a�_ r ! ! �LI r • o��� O L U+a! .
(7) , 7 ; a -( , Cif/ / ai � :t , . -�,�,:
', t- .7 �. (,�) t r/ j�t , < ;:L/ A ;,r t •,�C! 1 V :,'
ti. Lr ` L t \r1 G
1r �/ .. -, �1 -fit •�
1 /•Ci ` ` C� f f' �C ` '
Ve_
9'... cJ'-- % /".;' Af ' - f r..t...., /. //6c-' / ! ' ' G!'/ / r;-, l.e-C_. -At ; ' yl .-1+.
, u/--)1....1.4-,1-(Q (7) N'Tct---yuc,-ZsR_A_ , I - --3 1)414")-L:'..-) :?..4.-114.- .(fL.)
, . - • 1 ., '\\x-\\,;t3,, --'. \szci.--, c K1 ;\....) - '.. . k•.) •••, ' '.,,,,.::,:.,,..-c., ,,__,, \ •,...N. --,;- .,.\.- ,,- .y\....„N . ,'.
/I
/7. `-' ,1('. )
r . ---/'' '--/g) ;;-/1 - Z12-1-47,4q. A 'f".
_ r_ ' � • ? 7 �'� ,
. L�,,r..k ; l
U4- i3 �.�r�reA- li)(w5 - t"te2;.:"''
._
.
Js ; / � i • r {L' ll` , ,,i � ,f' - iY_ ;).�j[ .- � 1--
_ /J r �/ -- k. - I / .',✓ ; . • .� iCLAi .1 ' "'-i 4 G- -• t,:' , I41i ;g----:
-iii,27,„tp...,..,4,:e,L - /4'23 : 1', &? il'il'f3.23 • e e -
-1 -7v .
7
m'..
{
,ii �. :1 7^> / 7 L• /°"�Y, • _.„)-z, •,-"7::, f:' ., � /�,, /!' �' f t t`
5,-7�47 s,d70 4'ic 4R6' ---- a '6/ 2
.c, -, Jr
,,.., ,L-..,2:,. . , ,,,. . ,,,,,,, ,„ _ , .
/ b
. , .. to(1 -?-/-y 4C- / -,
0 ?ram j,) -4) °) �� L+Z -
�� L—hl
�' f::3 L //
4.-2 2r_.4-.)/ 2.4-,,,:.._4-....i 2(22. ,_,,...,,/,.....5,,
, ....,,,. .
t 2. 24,/ ?-
1 G
o. 17‹ '113 /7>---7. —e-/-2 C -17-A i:7 .177:-.1727 Z/-/./7/
. c. / (.)
ff ,Y7d fog / ...? ft' 71/vz5
L �./�j���✓
• c L 7 ..zoom nTit%7 gJ v !'/
..171-%
... . -/ /i'll " -lf72 i -.°'7/ /7/1 ---v...v...?e/.7'1',17: Mi)p,%74:71.., .
Z 04
1.-Z-- L Z.I LI'//:‘
C - :'l j1 ,:- 1r',a ' �r.0/ ,/—vp?'vr;�' /.//,,�—w ( zf co
v,.....
/ z/co
. c
. .
. . .
. ..
- - -
S j.b
/~..,,, '----k./. 47 7-- 1/'-=:-'-_—! •_ r..-7,-'� / rid, •,-4,• f "ter,,;, , GJ
- . c;S�� C H 3 tali .t�CL.
,� RENTON HILL PETITION
�. �/.'! { -,—'le 1.,,,-r k., „'1--:. .. ;�L; i/t.l J"' .. .1 ? . . ',�1...r�t y.L L.L �{
1.—/LX- 7 7 >'. rki-e • '6';( e , y-.. . „ to Q ,_
/'/- 77 3/y ..,C4-N�v .4-v` S
s;
pit'l:r. I IA:rlr. I.nL i.+..i..-.r f.
,,, - _•:-.' .ei ja)77 i 0 4ifk's ifIpAz_;e-. . / qacp t&_`', i
,.
I•�, i •.�.d.., h.,.(,sy5""Y,ry.,�.r :°Y"�..aJ i„ /f r '�d
ii , c/
f pc 0,,,, , . ibc,tc-i 0 h) ,', .
q�-.4. 4 I h°.: i , („L„,,„ a- :.' if,,L - ... err rk1)u S j 2,,...C�:s,
MY _ +° "*� ^•'r^ +. ry y d wry. ' "1�'• °'i "' . �p7/(/�� h. p/�] ,� - . .
aJ :4. __ F'\,N:.h.,./s..s"3:.... 0"w4✓' .l✓"`.134J4/4 •
/'7- 4L .i`.�l " ,/ ( 01
` y9' w • o " 1C .j 1
La. r�rf is � F Y � . } + „M
� � c
fLtl +� ( �7,
t hs: ,
4
.. ` Date / : ;:' Name/ p-- .,,,,: dress
... $ � c 77 /. 0,,u4iLl• / •j - -Y6v N,I/1A- -c___s• '�_ -
g - 4 - 77 % % p te //�z�v / ;///ker��5 /a,,__ '
�. -7 f a° / S 3 c . .
,/- Zy-7/7 / / f�' f I' /Z9'3 •Ca • 3,eD . -.. A .
. - a-a- "/7 / i - c.) . .(.� sdf � c1 • < e2 2 Yam)-,c() � �� r
• ' ,„,e 4-7,
• I.
7.fr 7 7,,, ,_.i , , .....771,... _ . ..,./ /..... /i--i_,,i. c ,---. / „I___//, '
.. 67 .:;__Z-/ /7:J.,4 i t/L//72, - ; / Z: 7 2 (4/x/t r", c..1 ". 4.--
77
•
V ri l 'r,, 0 o4,e-1 / / 1 43 'I.: 5 5,Lc, s+ t.g_ii"-}-0/1 -1:.:I
i ` �`� �r • rt
,s--/-7
S .7�/ %� ��6_ Dcbg a n ,/f i 0-O o • ,rce • 4: rr efl
, 1 I
5' ? /' 1. .4 v /, o I.�`6 _ ) $'
J l �,ei_;;:/, if � o
g s--7 2 ,' ,_.19cli / 1 2 '_ S . 'E�4 o, � , , ,
t-..) S-7) 7 / (111,t:e A / (.--)41/ - / . a i ' )
• F ' ,��;; : t, L - �`�. f �. r
ti ( ter ic.�� ` �/ < . C4 Z'(_ ✓C, 1 Vic-- . '.ice
`1 \Rr L r \
_ 1 F` r ± `t
•
9'__i C1 / . Lf i lk ['��;i!•L•- /- /',/i�'•L -S f'!� y f Gr ! -�� /�.;•-` .- i�1 i•F- -I Y :'I
•
e ; .._ I �ti=t t.���F z13 - lic2 0 1� P( i L'i,/ ,4 v r Y'G r'Ewf o,`•,-_-'
1
\-'
.,Si... .:)._';\i,c\,,,,,l-t_kz_ --As,,,S.CL'k,f1--)C-- r._. i\,......) • ..' -! ' .,,..,1:::.-!'l'. ',-.-:'. \ ''".-X..7-"C.-sNj:S.. .).1':S.1-;4\j' '`':...,.....
±.:r_- . 4.:L5 '.) LV
! �}/1/Z'-\_.&_ 7/\ > cr17 /6,71-'1,11A1 %mil //V...2A ''',,:: .,
— �_I - 9 . 7
, ilj,n f�k Z i.a.P�r'. �ti�ti lS f G�t^-1''`�-li l k'-�( •i.2c
/ _ J t
g.
/- - ^ 7 % :' ,l G/f --c, n f /� j./�
r •�,f/'r' �' —C.4.. y��/ Y t. tk.,IL/.c�/' F_.%-:
_� 7 �
v PETITION PAGE ;
DATE ' NAME ADDRESS
r
./.1,77-7/ , . . _L Y.' '' ' ' 4:.. . ;(.:. . 51.5.4'6144 tf,
. � 1
,. ,';',1V7 7 / At-14-7-ze-i - /a-Pe-07 • ‘ ., - 7. ile'' ''‘.4..? /04e,,/-- .-•
. d0
0/77 �' � `r f.r////. . S• _`—'' J7. 9„�a-'mot, _ �1n..a,; / _fffJJ) 5 i'4 g .�iI Sue o`
/., '. „:,-..•, '... • ...
Ct2;4.
i 5:4, 1' . A_ai,06„/, . .
, ,
.. .
. . , . „ . .,
A`�• ;� q . ' f • rl Cis 4 `q
lt ,, i. - 9 t-4,z. / 61 iz.
J'Iii . . .
, t ' .h L. . I -
1 I3dY i' 1 .-.. .. ,, ,,. .
. i
. 6,z,v)
.,i.
z, iii
4-1----2-- 0 j‘,2 7 eee"-cy '—0.1i41, - I. . " . .-: '1Y'''''
, ••(,- • /p/f or.„er2/
6.I"P7' 9 5.7.A.4,,' Ei I f- 4. . , . ,
l'.i' /.:4::D 4./.0'
1, /5/7 7' / ,L/lAia a"`"?`�` &,3//� ,Sti �r 1/j
.. -:•.:.•,„'..
n
.. M i°� A � 13 ��� �� .
gr ,44-� 1 ,,,it'G r t,hidrlck tq7 i,.7 �1.ftv'/ ,ive . SQ 1r
,14:--- 7,..,.. .te..--) -6 .1 . 4 • - 'f'-7Z / , - ' .- L%'..,
} / AV , r, j rat-t� �i.-,'�C.,', ...i �:. i•I. ;I
\, �, / �'` "r -L ‹. w/_3 '�� Cl+� "`;��:'� 1 r: k".> 1),,;,!/) :.: . -. •'.;.
�r�
',4A)//1,2 /.4*a..A.- • . 6 Nfki i '._ c5, 4/71)-i,,,,...':' ' , ,f...,'.'
c•-..i: i , .
J...--.4,-----,v . I 7„.., . , ,..,,,,,c,„,/ . . ;
-y'l :-,/,4..,--,,,,,,i-.... ...5---H,_. . .. . ..:L,,,;-::,.';,,::- .
Ax��r/ 0 t/r ,_5 ' i
i • D '_ram
it
j.;A . _l,1 c. — i ` '7Ir1 :
,.try:.
•
:
1
•
'
-..._.�.._._.....
' _
t -- --
.• • - • •
•
s
-: —
r.
•
•
i _1--
r; •
•
' i -
r:'
•
•
• ,
• _-
w._
—
•
•
'•
•
Public Hearing Renton H - Comprehensive Plan
January 4, 1978
TRANSCRIPT OF COUNCIL MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 1977 COUNCIL MEETING
Mayor Delaurenti: We will proceed to the Public Hearing which
involves the Comprehensive Plan for the Renton Hill area.
Mr. Ericksen, do you have a presentation you would like to make?
(Response not audible)
Mayor Delaurenti: Do you have any correspondence first that you
want to read, Mrs. Mead.
Delores Mead., City Clerk: Yes I do, Mr. Mayor. Clerk read
Planning Commission recommendation dated October 14, 1977
(Exhibit "A") and letter from Kathy Keolker, President, Renton
Hill Community Association dtd. November 21, 1977 (Exhibit "B") .
The clerk then read into the record a petition bearing 164 signatures
of residents on Renton Hill (Exhibit "C") and petition dated November
18, 1977 bearing 28 signatures (Exhibit "D") . Clerk read
letter from shidler, McBroom, Gates & Baldwin, Law 'Offices,
dated November 21, 1977 (Exhibit "E") . That concludes the
correspondence, Mr. Mayor.
--� Mayor Delaurenti: Mr. Ericksen, you may proceed now.
G. Ericksen: Mr. Mayor, initially I would like to point out
the fact that this is a hearing on the Comprehensive Plan. It
is not a consideration on zoning. I think this is particularly
important because already the error of zoning has been brought
into the correspondence that has been presented this evening.
I think that the recommendation of the Planning Commission is
related to the Comprelazsive Plan, the land use element of the plan,
the circulation element and community facilities element and
these are the subjects which I will address this evening. I
would like to point out for members of the audience the report
available on the front table here, the small 81/2 x 11
(1)
P. H. 11- 77
report, which is the report of the Planning Commission to the
City Council, also to the Commission itself , and these are
available for anyone who would like to receive a copy. This
is the Comprehensive Plan now, it's very small in scale and it
is difficult to see, however, it does explain what the Compre-
hensive Land Use Plan is , on the front, and further, what the
designations are, on the back, and I refer to these simply
because of the fact we'll be talking about these this evening
and I think it would help clarify the types of uses that are
Ii allowed in each of these use designations. The Planning Commission,
' { in its report to you and the Comprehensive Plan Committee's report
to the commission members dated, October 12th, initially goes into
the definition of •the Comprehensive Plan, its purpose, the
elements of the plan and basically what the Comprehensive Plan
consists of as we define it. Incidentally, in the City of Renton,
the Comprehensive Plan is comprised of four documents, as well
as the Comprehensive Plan map which is the large map designated
"Land Use Plan" , up on front. But, initially, the policy state-
ment of the plan is up in the front of the document. You might
note these documents were adopted in 1965. There is a Land Use
element; a Community Facilities element and an lirterial `street
element and Ilan. These basic documents relate to the various
items that I will discuss this evening and I particularly want to
point out that land use is only one aspect of the Comprehensive
Plan that will be discussed. The hearing on the first page of the
Planning Committee report states the purposes of the plan, I
think it is important to note, in particular the purpose to promote
public interest to facilitate a democratic determination, to
effect political and technical coordination and to inject long
range considerations into appropriate actions.
(2)
P. H. 11-21-
The commission, I mean, the plan, is to serve as a guide by its
nature it is a general document, it represents the best reasonable
concensus of opinion in terms of the process by which the
commission conducts hearings and then makes recommendations to
the City Council. I again emphasize the fact the Comprehensive
Plan is not zoning. The report from the Planning Commission gives
background information as to the process that may be conducted in
terms of study and analysis then the findings that were made as a
result of the study by the Planning Commission, and this is broken
down into land use again, circulation and community facilities.
I might note also the Planning Commission considered the natural
systems and natural characteristics of the area in giving that area
consideration. The commission also made recommendations on areas
that were in the same category however, before I run through those
what I would like to do is present some slides to bring you up
to date on basically the various considerations that were made and
how the commission arrived at the recommendations. Anyone else who
would like a copy of these report now? The area we are talking
about this evening is the Renton Hill area and I want to define It.
It's the misty aerial photo - east of the freeway down to the power
line right-of-way, down here and over approximately into this
vicinity, and E. to the Cedar river and back. This is the study
area as defined by the Planning Commission, and the Planning
Commission has had a hearing on this area. I mention this as it
is simply a slide of the large map up on the board which is the
land use plan which we will go into a little more detail later.
I mentioned the alternates of the plan which are the policy state-
ment, the arterial street plan, the community facility plan and
the land use plan. This is based on the original report that was
prepared in 1965. At that time the 1985 plan was adopted
(3)
P,H.
and the 1985 plan included various elements I just mentioned,
and later on this 1985 plan was the Community Facilities Plan.
It defines the Renton Hill area, next to this area we have a
park area and we have a park site, a school site, a community
level park facility, and a neighborhood park facility. This is
the Arterial Streets plan. I want to particularly point out in
this plan, the area we are considering, this is what is known
as the Mill Avenue Extension running into Tiffany Park area and
down into Cascade. This black line here is 'Grant Avenue. The
Mill Avenue extension here is a community collector. Grant Avenue
is an arterial street, it is also a neighborhood collector. This
is a blowup of that plan; I'm pointing out in particular its
somewhat fuzzy but this is the hill area and I might note this
area of the hill was designated in the brown color which is multi-
family residential, the rest of the area was yellow, and the green
is the park site, the blue is the school site and the red over
here is the freeway. Again, this was the plan adopted in 1965,
we found certain problems existed with the plan in terms of interpret-
ing it and we found other ways to handle the matter regarding the
problems and so the plan was revised. Basically this was the revision
as it occurred to us to define the area, particularly the multi-
family residential area and in fact it made for more specific
boundaries we have somewhat today. Although this plan does attempt
to separate the usage as noted here, the dark brown area stands
for high density residential, light brown for medium density and the
very light brown color stands for low density multiple. The area in
white is single family residential, green is the park site, and
blue is public facilities, and quasi public facilities.
Councilman Stredicke: Excuse me Mr. Mayor, please did you say the
(4)
P.H. •
plan was revised before or after the public hearing?
Mr. Erickson: It was revised after a series of public hearings
by the Planning Commission during 1967 and 1968. This is the Land
Use map of the area, somewhat difficult to read, this is Interpace
here, the freeway over here, basically the area is predominately
single family residential, there is some scattering of some multiple
use along Mill Ave. also one or two duplexes also located on Cedar.
This is the southerly portion of that particular map, this is the
powerline right-of-way I referred to, the park site and again the
development of the,area. Adjacent to the park site is the school
site, the tank site put up by the Renton School District. I
wanted to show this particular slide, it's a map showing mineral
resources, particularly the coal deposits. The coal deposits are
in and out of Renton. The Renton Hill area coal deposits, right
over here are defined by two different colors, the pink is for
depleted deposits and the blue is potential reserve or resources
that are available. Again, in the middle here, the pink area
represents mined out areas, the blue represents potential coal
deposits or in fact a reserve of coal which presently exists and
incidentally according to the geologists and mine people, in the
up and coming energy era that might eventually represent a potential
source of additional energy. I point this out particularly in
relation to our land use development and to show the possible
hazards that exist.
Councilwoman Shinpoch: Mr. Erickson, that pink area - did you
say abandoned mines?
Mr. Erickson: It's a mined out area, yes.
Councilwoman Shinpoch: All right then, are there shafts under there?
Mr. Erickson: Yes, they are all through there.
(5)
P.H. ;1-77
Councilwoman Thorpe: They're still there?
Ericksen: That's right. Basically also the underlying geological
condition consists of a shale-type of coal deposit, some sandstone
some gravel and sand. Generally speaking this material is a loose
type of material and the matter of fact is, they pose a potential
hazard in regard to landslides, and it's one of these areas the
Planning Commission took a good look at. I'd like to run through
is
a series of slides. Generally as you all know this/one of the
oldest areas in Renton. These are typically older homes, these
are single family. Here we have some older apartments and further
up a new apartment structure that has been constructed just off
Mill. Mill, incidentally is also a one way off Lake Avenue. This
level is one way North, and this area is one South. Here we have
a,new apartment building that has been constructed on Mill Avenue
off Cedar. and it shows some of the transitional uses and changes
that have occurred. At the same time we have a change from older
residential to newer types, actually remodeling. We have some
new structures on the hill and typically the majority of the hill
--� is older single family residential use. This is a series of three
shots from the top of the hill, another shot off Third, actually
it's up from Cedar. This is the corner of Third and Renton. Up
by the Phillip Arnold park looking to the South, then to the
South of the developed. area we have some new residential construc-
tion occurring and the powerline right-of-way to the South and
Thunder Hill in the background where new and existing residential
multi-family development is occurring. Then to the Northwest we
have additional area that is potentially available for development
along Renton Avenue. The access to the hill Third and Mill. this
is a shot along Third looking the Southeast, directly to the
(6)
P.H. 11• .77
east, and to the South of Mill itself, then looking back again
under a a different acess, this is on Third and Mill to the North. .
Then a series of shots essentially of existing street conditions, '
and this is Cedar looking toward the South again, Some grade &
coating construction has been occurring creating problems for
the street and also apartments.
Stredicke: Is that a one way street or is it a two way?
Ericksen: Yes. This is a shot of Renton Avenue, looking to the
South from Third, further up you will notice the same cars park-
ing on the street. Looking North, looking at the triangle inter-
section at Third and Renton. Then further up again we have a
typical street situation. Some of the graphic characteristics
are at the area of 7th, the pipeline right-of-way, owndd by the
Seattle Water Department. In view of this the Commission incident-
, ally was in the field on two or three different occasions looking
at the hill areas as shown in the characteristic colors. The
question here primarily is a question not of validity of the
Land Use here, but of the circulation system as proposed. The
circulation system incidentally is, still the adopted plan of the
city. This is at Mill, this is the closed Mill extension. This
is Lake Young and this is Grant Avenue South. The original plan,
obviously the stress is on the division of additional access to
the hill area. Looking at the access question, it simply denotes
location, We did do some detail study on it as to the hill area.
Additionally here is the extension of what would be Mill, reversed
and down to the area, come around a curve on a powerline right-of-
way in this vicinity. This is a shot looking South on Mill, both
showing characteristics of the area. This is up, this is the one
way we have here at the present time. We have as I have mentioned
(7)
F 11-21-77
earlier some multi-family residential use, basically single-
family residential on the east side of the street. Further to
the'.south, we have the Chalet apartments. This is the area
that the proposed road is reversed. The Planning Commission is
looking at a series of questions for the feasibility of it,
particularly looking at the topographic characteristics and
simple physical obstructions presently in the area, and therefore
made its recommendation based on these. Further to the south,
turn to the plan and the recommendation of the commission based
on the existing arterial street plan, Land-Use. With this I
would like to go into specific recommendations of the commission.
In regard to the Land-Use the Planning Commission recommended,
and again the basis of this recommendation is the result of the
analysis study of the public hearings that went on as for the
actual recommendations to the City Council. But, in regards to the
Land Use on page 7, the Committee recommends as follows:
1. Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill
area, the committee recommends that the hill area north of the
Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission right-of-way be
designated as single family residential. 2. The steep hillside
areas, powerline right-of-ways and natural drainage coursed be
established as Greenbelt areas, in addition to those presently
designated on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. I might point out
the power line right-of-way pointed out are outlined in grey on
the large map and steep hillside area is between top of hill and
Interpace designated as greenbelt. In regard to the circulation:
Oh, I' ll just read this: 1. The land Use designations as reflected
in the existing Comprehensive Plan was based upon provision of
additional access to the Renton hill area to the South and Southeast.
(8)
11-21,
The extension of Mill Avenue South is not physically feasible
and therefore, it is recommended by the committee that such
designation of the Arterial Street Plan be deleted. 2.
Extensive input on the part of the residents in the hill area
indicates the desire to continue the limited access to the hill
(Third and Mill) as it is presently constituted. The purpose
of such limitation is to enhance the amenities of the hill area
as a residential community and preclude through access. It is,
therefore further recommended that the proposed Grant Avenue
connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of
access of the hill. 3. It is recognized that improved access
will be necessary to serve the properties to the south and the
southeast of the Renton Hill area at such time as they are
developed. The intent of the committee's recommendations is
that such access be provided from the South.
Stredicke: On slides you indicate study area includes that area
below location of Gladding McBean and Riviera.
Ericksen: Industrial area, will remain as shown manufacturing
park or light industry.
Stredicke: What bout 10 years from now? What about access?
Ericksen: In terms of existing facility? If it were phased
out, and frankly, it was the conclusion of the committee that
other potential uses exist for that location. Basically it
enters at Mill and Houser Way and access into same area.
Kathy Keolker, 532 Cedar Avenue South, (President Renton Hill
Community Association) What about rezone, there was second
petition supporting the opposition to multi-family on Renton
Hill with over 250 signatures to date, the community group.
We ask your help in solving, we are opposing apartment develop-
ment on Renton Hill, we have united. We.value the good qualities
(9)
P. 11-21-77
of life in Renton and want growth for Renton Hill to be single
family residential. The members of the Renton Hill Community
Association have chosen me to represent them. Have spent weeks
with the Planning Commission and support their recommendations.
A
There would be severe detrimental impact with multi-family.
Street width does not allow it. We have low crime rate. (Rereads
Exhibit B)
Claude Rogers, 420 Renton Avenue South, I have been homeowner
on Renton Hill for 17 years and have one, of the older homes built
in 1911. I want to talk about traffic on the hill and the steep-
ness of hill. With new condominiums built at south end of hill,
how are they going to get in and out of parking lot when snow comes.
The City of Renton Street Department has helped us every year
being there early and sanding morning and night; can't with cars
on hill. In days gone by, pipe line was open to South. Traffic
on hill was very heavy. When pipe line was open 1,279 cars
traveled west, think its a conspiracy against us. When there is
one train, we go three blocks to get one block, but we put up
___------
with it. How would we handle this additional traffic? Streets
were wide enough. In 24 hour period, streets only used 50%,
better no parking on one side.
Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue South, lowest crime rate in Renton is
on Renton Hill due to geography and lack of access; we care for
and about each other. Any law breaker must pass Police Department
on his escape route. This exit would permit easy escape, increased
crime rate would require more police. School children and picked
up and bussed to Bryn Mawr; children wait for bus at bottom of hill,
middle and high school students walk. In 1972 pipeline road opened.
I brought a nine-year old child up the hill after encounter. I
do not mean to imply all people that would come into our area
(10)
P. H. 1] -77
are bad, but we do want to protect our children and homes and
preserve our neighborhood.
Ethel Telban, 508 Cedar Avenue South, coal discovered on Renton
Hill in 1803 and they began Renton Cooperative company, later
became Renton Cooperative. The first school was built at 4th
and Main, where Labontes' is and it later moved to Houser Way and
Wells and became Duncalf Meat Market. The first church was built
on Renton Hill in 1886 it was the Presbyterian, at Mill and Beacon.
Plat #1, one acre drawn up in 1892, plat #2 drawn up 17-18-98,
the first three blocks on the hill, with one acre tracts. Mrs
Jones who drew up plat was engineer of first locomotive to be
brought into Renton, first railfoad in Washington. The first
residents came to settle and built homes on the tracts purchased
from the Cooperative Coal Company. Renton Hill was all single
family home with exception of the first apartment on Mill Avenue.
On Cedar Street the Walker house was remodeled into apartments.
There were some illegal basement apartments in homes on Cedar South
in single family areas, this was an economic thing. Second the
—`- Third generation people have come back to live and some never left.
Unique is the percent of very few absentee landlords on the hill.
It is stable community and this is how we would like to keep it.
Jim Breda, 1002 Grant Avenue South, I am member of the Renton Fire
Department. Last Tuesday night about a dozen of us collected
funds on Renton Hill for our efforts. Feel gratified that people
support this. Spoke to Planning Commission. Feel strongly. most
important to preserve the neighborhood - construction of multi-
unit dwellings detrimental effect upon the community. It is an
established, stable neighborhood which though close to the freeway,
but secluded and family oriented, being of all ages and income.
(11)
P. H. -21-77
When I addressed the Planning Commission, I spoke to rumors which
came from a variety of people, such as our community is regressive,
deteriorating. It is interesting why the Council chambers are full
of people in community care. Renton Hill is important part of
historical heritage of our community. Preservation of Renton
Hill is in fact preservation of historical heritage of Renton.
Cedar Avenue - when car going north and one south, you have conjestion.
Lots of automobiles parked that shouldn't be there. Garages on
the east side are too narrow. Large number of multi-family would
ruin character of our hill. When large money corporation is gone,
we will still be there.
Bill Montangne, Vice-President of Transamerica Development Co. ,
We are large powerful corporation; think Renton Hill is a beautiful
area and compliment the way they keep their homes and everyone
should be proud. Want to explain our position. We have owned
ten (10) acres for over ten (10) years. When bought, bought
from Puget Western and zoned R-3 and charged multiple-family area
prices. That was a long time ago and don't think the situation
has changed. We do have pending offer for-price is less than
what we paid. We are just trying to come out whole. We bought
the property over ten (10) years ago and never heard anything
about changing Comprehensive Plan until we had offer for property.
We have freeway on one-side, it is steep and north side existing
multiple along with powerline planned multiple or cluster use.
We would have difficult time putting single family on that. We
would have to take a real look, might recommend'.Council members
go into review debth on traffic. We did have traffic engineer
look at the area there as you can see, he claims Cedar is operating
at 50% of capacity and with ninety (90) unit condominium it would
be within defined limits. Look at traffic engineer study. I am
(12)
P. H. 11-2]
here representing Transamerica Development Corp. We feel we
have been citizen and part of community and really believe we
are trying to be reasonable. Hope Council will look at our
side before you make decision about rezoning.
Stredicke; Second Bruce, Move we recess for five minutes.
Perry: Want to speak against motion. We have a lot of people
here and have study by Planning Commission, Planning Commission
had traffic study. Five minutes will not give us time. We are
going to have to accept Planning Commission report or review matter.
Stredicke: I am not a product of fast reading. Want to see if
it differs from staff.
Perry: Wait until we have heard all the speakers and review
matter.
Stredicke: I withdraw the motion.
Gene Farrell: Developer and purchaser of the Transamerica
property, 11112 Rainier Ave. S. , Traffic study that was done
was based upon City of Renton traffic report and Engineers went
into field to reverify. Some sort of control possibly park on
--� one side only allowing two lanes. I have approximately two
questions: 13 acres of land and if I was to concur in single
family with four units per acre it would mean approximately 52
single family dwellings. The maximum condominiums would be 90.
In opinion of Public-Works Director Gonnason and Planning
Director Ericksen, how much greater effect from 52 single family
vs. 8.5 cluster units. Would thirty (30) additional dwellings
have that much effect? Baring will have that much access. We
have estimated cost of developing. Our average cost of
development is $4,750.00 per lot or $9,000.00 per lot 15-20'/
for a developed lot.
Perry: Point of order. This is Comprehensive Plan we are considering,
(13)
P. H. 21-77
not zoning or building. We can not excuse developer for getting
off the subject, the intent of the Comprehensive Plan is to show
reasons for high density and the best development for the area.
Farrell: I think change is what we are discussing. The
measure that change is either/or remains R-3 or 2 goes to R-1 single
family. I am trying to point out the feasibility development -
wise is similar that problems being address have closeness.
If single family and platted, there is only 30 dwelling units
difference between existing and proposed where the cost estimates
are down, this is question of feasibility. Approval of approximate
development cost is $9,000 per lot - this proposed plat $20,000;
52 families to invest.
Perry: We are getting off the Comprehensive Plan when speaking
about prices or homes.
Farrell: My feeling is there are some problems that need direction
to be practical solutions. Think possible review of parking and
control overall plan for approval; based on these we feel zoning
does not allow 400 to 500 units on this property. We are not
interested in that - not that large. Statistics show 20 people,
less traffic. 100% of problem caused by 20% of the people.
They speak in terms of third generation and this is great. People
want to move to area and for the same reasons people want to
live there also. Certain amount of discrimination - you are talking
about economic discrimination.
Patricia Parks, 118 N. 40th, Seeat, Attorney for Transamerica
Development Company. Want to talk about perspective in
Comprehensive Plan. It was recommended 4-2 by the Planning Commission.
People on Mill Avenue were in area of change. Lots of discussion
of Renton Hill and community. What the Comprehensive Plan points
out is Mill and Cedar are zoned R-3 because of the freeway.
(14)
P.H. 11-2;
Some of area abuts freeway with very steep terrain and is ideally
suited for condominium development. This is prime R-3 area,
this area is different; the ideal use is multiple family. Illegal
apartments were mentioned in R-1. There is multi-family on
Mill and Cedar West, so it sould be made legal. Lots of people
wouldn't live on my client's property; these areas are different
from other parts of Renton Hill and probably lower than freeway
in some cases. Would say Renton Hill should be preserved as it
is. Multi-family on my clients wouldn't change. Cedar Avenue
West should be rezoned to make what is going on there illegal.
Stredicke: You said single family homes are being used for
apartments and city sould make it illegal.
Pat: Some part west of Cedar Avenue, some of Cedar Avenue is
zoned R-1. There are some illegal multi-family. Rather than
trying to change property, accept what is happening; make west
side of Cedar Avenue South multi-family.
Stredicke: Accept change that has occurred?
Pat Parks: See page 12 of our response (Exhibit E) believe that
is the worst house. Banks aren't eager to lend money.
Stredicke: Is your appraisal public record?
Pat: Can't say we have willing buyer.
Bill Montagne: Thought we should have outside source.
Questionable if we would be so high, wouldn't be marketable
along freeway.
Mrs. Alice Hansen: 336 Mill Ave. S. property owner, down
zoning our property on Mill from R-3 to R-1 would decrease property
value and not result in benefit to our property. Would not just
leave the hill, but we have paid taxes on the basis of R-3 and
believe that proposed down zoning on Mill Avenue is unjust and
(15)
P.H. 1 L-77
unfair to property owner.
Mario Gotti: 1005 High S. , was listening to Mr. Farrell
talking about 90 unit apartment and other building. We are
talking about traffic; when we are talking about 200 to 400
' more people going up that hill. Where are the people going
to put their cars if it is one way. What is this coming to.
Bill Montagne: Property we own we are selling to Mr. Farrell
those are the same 90 units on the south side of power line,
along Cedar at end of street, that was Farrell's 90 units.
Paul Von Beck, 18184 SE 141st Place, Issaquah, recently
purchases property on Mill Ave. S. , a small 3 unit apartment
and do not represent a large corporation. I represent a small
land owner. I purchased this property on basis of R-3 and for
an investment. Does Renton Hill Community Club consider Mill
Ave. S. as part of their community? , If so, why is Mill Ave.
being asked to bear the brunt. It is our property being
changed, not the rest of the property. Who will compensate
the large land owner or small property owner if this change
goes through?
Stredicke: Asks Transamerica, page 1 of report, engineer
says his traffic count agrees with that of city engineer
because it is not based on city information but on professional
information.
Pat: This traffic study was prepared by Joseph J. Millegan
& assoc. who counted cars. City reports in back of folder
and figures tally.
Stredicke: Why is comparison in study of Cedar and S. 5th
rather than Cedar and S. 3rd why you went up the hill rather
than counting at intersection?
Stredicke:. Mr. Farrell is not responsible\report.
(16)
P.H. -21-77
Farrell: It is my engineer.
. Pat: Can get you more information. Can get letter from them.
Farrell: This is where the city did their report and we did ours
at the same location.
Robert McBeth, 1632 Lincoln Crt. SE, Rolling Hills, Attorney
located at 505 B. S 3rd representing Renton Hill Community
Association. Not trying to drag on hearing, with recommendations
of the Planning Commission and their study in debth. Their
recommendations are appropriate - spent five months to be acceptable.
I compliment the Planning Commission, analysis made and recommen-•-
lotions with both sides given an opportunity. We are not anti-
growth; multiples are appropriate in certain places, but not, on
Renton Hill. I am Usually representing the developer. Wouldn't
have taken this case unless I felt strongly that the residents
case is unique and have tried to present reasons why it is different.
Most input is about traffic and circulation question. If this
property developed to maximum, it could be 300. That should not
be allowed. Should be single family and multiple, these things
--r would be drastically affected. We didn't include Mill Avenue.
We have no feelings as if affects Mill Avenue. Traffic on Mill
Avenue will not be affected. Streets are not wide enough. Our
concerns are traffic, crime, the neighborhood and equality of that
neighborhood. Our feeling is that this is not one of the areas
that would be suitable for multiple family.
Anita Theilander, 512 Mill Avenue S. , Where are our kids going
to live in the future? We just bought additional lot R-3, at a
higher price and want something for our future.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE THE HEARING.
Shinpoch: I will speak against.. Who owns this property, Farrell
or Transamerica? Was it Recently sold?
(17)
P.H. 21-77
Now I understand that is not the case.
Stredicke: It is an area with multiple ownership. We have
a list of 20 names protesting on Mill, all individual home
owners.
Bill Montagne: Transamerica owns the property in fee and has
a contract to sell to Mr. Farrell.
Mayor: Question on the motion, to close the hearing: MOTION
CARRIED. (Time: 9:58 p.m.)
Stredicke: Don't need five minutes now. Cannot find any
substantial change to what Planning Commission has recommended.
Do feel that area near interstate should be excluded from change as
that is not going to affect traffic assuming city is going
to do more. Renton is only place you go north to go south.
Do find one fault with Gladding McBean property. Do not feel
that property should remain light industrial in 20 year plan.
STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT, ELIMINATING EXTENSION OF MILL AVE. S. AND GRANT AVE. S.
CHANGING DESIGNATION OF ALL OF RENTON HILL FROM MULTI-FAMILY
TO SINGLE FAMILY WITH EXCEPTION OF MILL AVE. S. TO S. SEVENTH
ST. , AND THE AREA WHICH IS OCCUPIED BY GLADDING McBEAN BE
DESIGNATED AS RECREATIONAL. MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED.
(Time: 10:00 p.m.)
(Time: 10:15 p.m.) Mayor: Meeting come to order and clerk
call the roll.
Clerk: Perry, Clymer, Bruce, Shinpoch, Stredicke, Thorpe: All
present. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THE MATTER OF
RENTON HILL ZONING BE REFERRED TO THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER.
CARRIED.
Clymer: We have a lot or ordinances from last week.
(18)
P. 11-21-77
Perry: We have an ordinance on a moratorium set on building
which is to be completed soon and would like to introduce.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, THAT THE MATTER OF ORDINANCE
AND MORATORIUM BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO
EVALUATE AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.
Stredicke: First item on consent agenda deals with Rolling
Hills and they are asking about proPerty south of that and
I am wondering whether the Planning Commission have reviewed
and maybe we should put off 90 days or until Planning Commission
completes study.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, WITH PERMISSION OF SECOND
WANT TO AMEND MOTION TO INCLUDE LETTER FROM ROLLING HILLS HOME
OWNERS AND THAT MORATORIUM BE INCLUDED IN MOTION. AMENDMENT
CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED.
ill
(19)
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2209
WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City of Renton,
Washington, has recently recommended changes to the Comprehensive
Plan within certain areas of the City, and
WHEREAS such- review and recommendations include an area
in the City generally known as "Renton Hill" as hereinafter more
particularly described, and
WHEREAS it has been determined by the City Council and
the Planning Commission, that serious problems may result in said
• area if unlimited construction were permitted for any multiple
dwelling, commercial or industrial purposes, due to insufficient
and inadequate street access, circuitous traffic pattern, means of
ingress and egress, and such existing problems may seriously affect
the public health, safety and well being of the community, and in
particular the residents within the hereinbelow described area, and •
WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Renton has passed
an Ordinance changing the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for said
--`- Renton Hill, and
WHEREAS the City Council has referred the subject of zoning
on Reniton Hill to the Planning and Development Committee and to the
Land Use Hearing Examiner, and
WHEREAS it is deemed to be in the best interest of the City
to continue a moratorium on certain construction pending completion
of the present studies and reviews, including public hearings thereon,
and
WHEREAS the subject of rezoning of certain property on
Renton Hill has been heard by the Hearing Examiner, and a portion of
the property has been rezoned by action of the City Council, being
Rezone No. 178-78, dated August 28, 1978; and
WHEREAS it will take additional time for the Hearing
Examiner's decision to be rendered and for the appeals time to run, .
NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: The above statements and recitals are hereby
found to be true and correct in all respects
SECTION II: In furtherance of public health, safety and
general welfare, there is hereby declared a continuation of a
moratorium for the construction, improvement and alteration of any
multiple apartment buildings, commercial and industrial facilities
of every type and nature, for a period of sixty (60) days from
date hereof, relating to all properties affected by a change in the
Comprehensive Plan and subject thereby to a potential rezone
contained within the confines of that area generally known as Renton
Hill, in particular described as:
All that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 17, Twp.
23 N. , Range 5 E.W.M. , lying east of FAI 405 and
south of Chicago-St. Paul Milwaukee and Pacific
Railroad. Together with all that portion of the
NW 1/4 of Sec. 20, Twp. 23 N. , Range 5 E.W.M. lying
east of FAI 405 and north of Puget Sound Power and
Light Company transmission line easement excluding
those properties along Mill Avenue South extending in
an easterly direction 1/2 block more or less to the
• alley located between Mill Avenue South and Cedar Avenue
South, north of South 7th Street, as noted on the attached
Exhibit A, and also excluding that portion referred to
in Rezone Application No. 178-78 referred to above.
The aforespecified moratorium shall not apply to existing
apartments, single family or duplex dwellings or the renovation,
repair or maintenance of same.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 28th day of August, 1978.
Delores A. Mead, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYORh ?. /�l,_ ay ,gust 78
Approved as to form: Lev
Charles Delaurenti, Mayor
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
p _ ,
16A
1.1 t
i/J\
mil'
4 lit
ti 4/ a 17�WYhl 0
� �� Z
D7,lia,„ 1a ., OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY e RENTON,WASHINGTON
n t , POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678
o
acs �' ti
ch
O'A (0.
q- LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
o �
��TFD SEPIt° JULY 5 , 1978
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
TO : Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner
Z6COZIN17
FROM: Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney
Re!, Renton H.i.11 Rezone
Dear Rick:
I have been asked to correspond with you concerning your
stated inability to render an opinion on the Renton Hill Rezone
within the time given to you by City Ordinance. It is my
opinion that if it is in fact impossible for you to render
that opinion within the required time, and, if there is no
showing that the delay was unreasonable or prejudicial to any
party, then you may have the additional time.
I might note that this opinion is consistent with State case
law. The Supreme Court of this State recently set down such
a ruling in the case of In Re Donohoe, 90 Wn (2d) , 173 (June
1978) . In that case the State said :
"The delay was not unreasonable in view of
the necessity of obtaining and reviewing
3 days of testimony, plus the exhibits . That
fact, coupled with no claim or showing of
prejudice, justifies denial of a dismissal ."
In that particular case a hearing board of the State Bar
Association was to be able to render an opinion within 20
days as required by Court rules . I find that situation
analogous to yours and find that the delay is appropriate.
•
Lawrence J. WArren
LJW';nd
cc : Mayor .
Council Members
Del Mead
532 Cedar Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
January 16, 1978 / .
RE. 'EIVED
Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor
Members of the Renton City Council JAN 17 1978
Members of the Renton Planning Commission
Renton City Hall MY OF RENiON
200 Mill Avenue South r MAYOR'S OFFICE
Renton, Washington 98055
Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Commissioners:
This letter is to notify you of the recent action
taken by the Renton Hill Community Association. By
unanimous vote, the Renton Hill Community Association
Board of Directors has authorized and encouraged our
attorney, Bob McBeth, to petition the court for permission
to intervene in the pending lawsuit the Transamerica
Corporation has filed against the City of Renton. The
association and Mr. McBeth will take whatever steps are appropriate and necessary to assist, the City of Renton 00 13 )l
and defend the actions the city has taken to encoura $l,9
responsible growth for Renton Hill as a single fami `'d
neighborhood.
It is our position that, by changing the city'
comprehensive land use plan to single family use gyro�,,, 'Y,
designation on Cedar Avenue, the city has responded T1
to the demonstrated needs of the people in a small 4e VP r�U
and unique family neighborhood - the needs and concer /;ic �`;% -
that have been presented in numerous public hearings
and committee sessions with both the Planning Commission
and the City Council.
We thank you for your actions to• save our neighborhood
and offer continuing support to assist you in whatever
manner we can.
Sincerely,
—ett4)
Kathy Keolker, President
Renton Hill Community
Association
ge-41-1'7%
GLfiC-obi
o
Renton City Council
1/23/78 Page 4
Consent Agenda - Continued
Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND •PERRY°,. COUNCIL CONCUR IN CONSENT AGENDA.
Approval CARRIED. ,
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
Fire Station Bids Letter from Mayor Delaurentf/ recommended :Council acceptance of '
the low bid for the Main Fire Station of. John. Maples. (see attached ,
Architect Present tabulation) . The letter' explained :total Cost 'of the project as .
Cichanski & Assoc., $906,701 which is $94,555 over.;budge:t The. le'tterrecommended
the additional money be borrowed,from 'the.Street "Forward Thrust Fund
' and a percentage of the "Utility Tax .be 'set aside in ;1979 to repay loan.
The letter noted meeting .with the arch-itect and Fire Station .
Advisory 'Committee. MOVED .BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER
: THE MATTER.TO THE WAYS; AND. •MEANS. CO.Mh1IT_TEE. MOVED BY THORPE , SECOND . .•
CLY:MEP, AMEND MOTION TO I:NCLUDE 'PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REFERRAL ."
MOTION CARRIED, MOTION '. ;AS`;'AMENDED;CARRIED.. `'a`�
Renton Hi 11 .and Letter from" Kathy Keolke'r.., 'President `of the Renton Hi 11 Community - -
Transamerica Association; . notified'�Counci.l of the ;unanimous decision of the
•
Court Case Renton Hi l Community'�,Associ`ation` and',Board• 'of Directors" to author- .
ized and encouraged their.. a;ttorney, Bob McBeth, to petition the court
• for permission to .intervene' i n the pending lawsuit which the Trans
america.-Corporation :has."filed against; the City. The letter ex- ,
plained the association: and Mr. McBeth" 'would. assist the City and
defend the. City' s actions ,:i:n ,changin.g .the ,Ci,ty' s Comprehensive
•
Plan to single-family-use designation on Cedar Ave. S. MOVED BY
PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFE'R, THE MATTER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY
FOR ADVICE'TO COUNCIL.: ;CARRIED: ' . :, •
;.
Council Agenda , Counci 1Man Clymer presented :a:. letter letter from `Washington Natural Gas
Scheduling. Co. received. after the ''clos'ing;'of agenda: scheduling. Clymer Moved, ,
Thursday Noon seconded by Shinpoch',; that :the'matter be: referred to the Ways and
Deadline Means Committee as action was 'neededby;'the time of the next Council
Upheld ' meeting: SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY .THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE, 1-HE LETTER
BE PLACED ON THE-REGULAR AGENDA FOR THE NEXT: COUNCIL MEETING ON
'FEBRUARY 6, 1978 ROLL CALL:, 4 AYE'.;` TRIMM, STREDICKE, THORPE,
' PERRY;, 3-NO:' CLYMER,' SHANE SHINPOCN:'.':'MOTION CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS; MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND ,PERRY; COUNC:IL:REFER THE MATTER OF POLICE ,
Police Escort ESCORT, SERVICE FOR ALL: FUNERALS:TO'THE COUNCILS , PUBLIC SAFETY
• . COMMITTEE: CARRIED. " : .
Traffic Signals MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STRED.ICKE, COUNCIL REFER TO THE TRANSPORTATION.
- COMMITTEE THE SUBJECT MATTER:;,•; THAT FOLLOWING TRAFFIC SIGNALS BE
OPERATED: ON CAUTION EXCEPT: DURING'THE'.PEAK'WORKDAY HOURS OF 7:00 to
8: 30 a.m. AND 4:00 to 5::30 p':m. : THIRD:AND FOURTH AVES.N. AT FACTORY,:' ' -
WILLIAMS N:, GARDEN N:` „AND'BRONSON: WAY. ROLL CALL: 5 AYE: TRIMM,
SHANE, STREDICKE, •THORPE PERRY; °2;,NO::•-: CLYMER 'AND SHINPOCH.
MOTION CARRIED.
Speed Limit. Councilman Shane asked that the: spee;dl'-'.limi,t be raised from 35 mph '--
to •40/45 mph on the 'Maple Valley -Higliway,' Cemetery Road (NE 4th St. ) , ,
Lake Washington Boulevard: and;. Sunset'' Boulevard: , Moved by Stredicke,
' Second Shane, council'�refer" the matter, to the .Administration to
check speed. limit on these` streets and report back. ROLL CALL:
.3-AYE: SHANE, STRED.ICKE, THORPE; 4-NO: CLYMER, TRIMM, SHINPOCH AND
" PERRY. MOTION FAILED., -; '';.-
Councilman Shane Proposed motions by' Councilman. Shane;,••which :received no second: All
City enrol oyees" be given eight` Months live within the City. All ` '
• ' City employees will' :be: given sane wage, increase, and. benefits given
to Police and -Fire personnel : -
Executive Session MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND-PERRY,, COUNCIL MEET::IN ..EXECUTIVE SESSION RE
LABOR NEGOTIATIONS CARRIED Members of the",audience and staff not
' involved were requested'.to`°leave the`',Chambers:'at 10:50 p.m. COUNCIL" • ;• ::
ADJOURNMENT MEETING ADJOURNED. AT 11.;:25 p.m. : . •. , `.
Delores A. Mead,:.Cit Clerk
ree1667,P
1i
SHIDLER, MCBROOM, GATES & BALDWIN
LAW OFFICES (206) 223-4566
ROGER L.SHIDLER 1000 NORTON BUILDING
GEORGE W. McBROOM
WILLIAM H. GATES SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104
WILLIAM F. BALDWIN
JAMES R. IRWIN December 28 , 1977
JAMES C. MID,DLEBROOKS
RICHARD B. DODD
FREDERICK ROSS BOUNDY
JAMES L. FLETCHER
CRAIG V. WENTZ
DAVID T. McDONALD
PATRICIA J. PARKS
DALE K. ROUNDY '; i
GARY D. HUFF •
WILLIAM A.BUTLER C �2fl 1977
ICM( OFRENfrpJ
G�,,;u S OFFICE
Honorable Charles Delaurenti
• Mayor - The City of Renton
City Hall
Renton, Washington
Re: Transamerica Development Company v. City of Renton
Dear Mayor Delaurenti:
Enclosed is the original of Writ of Certiorari, a copy of
which has been served upon you. However, :the original must be
served and your response filed with the court as indicated in
the writ, i.e . , .Febr-uary 15, 1978 .
Sinc. -rely,
•
Cr lam-V. Wen z -'.
CVW:pm
ENC:
•
• 411
Fr2 •
•
i,�'�car°�ra�s�„�
• � .', i
CITY 'OF
a2 MAYD RE�ViUN
R S OFFICE
3 •
4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY
5
6 TRANSAMER.ICA DEVELOPMENT )
COMPANY, -a California )
7 corporation, )
8 Plaintiff, ) NO. 3 .799
9 —vs— )
10 THE CITY OF RENTON, WRIT OF CERTIORARI
11 Defendant. )
12
13 TO: CHARLES DELAURENTI, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF RENTON
14 AND TO : DELORES MEAD, CLERK OF THE CITY OF RENTON
15 AND TO: MEMBERS OF THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, To-wit:
16 KENNETH: BRUCE BARBARA SHINPOCH
EARL CLYMER RICHARD STREDICKE
17 GEORGE PERRY THOMAS TRIMM
PATRICIA SEYMOUR-THORPE
18 : •
AND TO: THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS
19
20 WHEREAS, it has been represented to this court by the
21 application and affidavits in support thereof of William A.
22 Montagne and Craig V. Wentz on file herein, that you have (1)
23 made erroneous legal determinations and followed illegal pro-
24 cedure,s; - (2) acted illegally; (3) exceeded your jurisdiction and
• 25 (4) proceeded in conflict with the course of the common law, all
26 of which have materially prejudiced the plaintiff, by providing
27 inadequate notice of your several actions, by ignoring 'the re-
28 quirements of the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, by
29 interferring with plaintiff ' s contractual rights and/or expectan-
30 cies, by encouraging the taking of plaintiff ' s land without fair
31 compensation, by acting arbitrarily, capriciously and in a dis-
32
Writ of Certiorari - 1
LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER, McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666
•
/ r
a �
1 criminatory manner with respect to plaintiff 's land and by
2 violating the appearance of fairness doctrine; and
•
3 WHEREAS, by order of this court duly given and made in
4 the above-captioned proceedings on the ii day of 11121t.. e
5 1977 , it was ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue to you,
6 Now, Therefore,
7 YOU ARE COMMANDED to fully certify and return to this
8 court on or before the ICE day of , 1978 , a full,
9 true and complete transcript of the entire record and proceedings
10 in this 'matter, aforesaid, as fully as the same are now before you,
11 including the testimony given at hearings held before you and
12 before your Planning Commission, to the end that the same may
13 be reviewed by this court and such action taken thereof as . of
14 right and as according to law shall be taken and done, and that
15 you are commanded and required to desist from further proceedings
16 in the matter to be reviewed.
17 DONE IN OPEN COURT this 1:7 day of , 1977 .
18 cr:-..!S AND
19 JUDGE/COURT COMMISSIONER
20 King County Superior Court
21
22 -_ King County Superior Court Clerk
23 Presented by frktho pup.®nor Court
_ SHIDLER, McBROOM, GATES, & BALDWIN ._ .
RNa�hd
24 • % \ MI
' �25 By: ..
C V. Wen._' .. c,►
26 of Attorneys for Plaintiff
27
28
29
30
31
32
Writ of Certiorari -2
LAW OFFICES OF
SHIDLER, McBROOM,GATES & BALDWIN
1000 NORTON BUILDING
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
223-4666 .
sly ., OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY o RENTON,WASHINGTON
ta. tic
Cr/ POST OFFICE.BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678.
O .ab. ti
�Q- LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
o�gT£b SEP� January. 9., 1978.
Hon. Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor
Members of City Council
City of Renton
Renton, Washington 98055
Re; Transamerica Development Company
vs City of Renton .
King County Cause No, 838799
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
This letter is to advise you tha on January 6 , 1978 , Judge
Goodloe of the King County Superi' r .Court, decided to issue'
the Writ of Certiorari against the City of Renton to permit
Superior Court review of th.e changes in the Comprehensive
Plan for Renton Hill, This Writ will require the City to
certify to the Superior Court its records, exhibits , etc
and a full transcript of the proceedings so that the Superior
Court can conduct a full review. A trial_ date will be
obtained after the City has certified the records to the
Court. •
Early trial dates are given, usually, for such writs .
In the meantime, I will be going back into Court to obtain
clarification of the original Writ. The way the Writ was
worded it would prevent the City from taking any actions
on Renton Hill and I am sure the intent was to limit the
City' s right to act strictly to the Transamerica property.
If you have any questions about this. matter, please feel
free to contact me.
Very truly yours ,
Lawrence J. Warren
City Attorney
LJW :nd
•
Renton City Council
12/19/77 Page 3
Correspondence and Current Business - Continued
Rezone Appeal $110 fee plus S25 appeal fee. 1•10TION CARRIED adopting committee recom-
Ray Ball mendations. Thorpe asked her NO voice vote be recorded.
Leslie Adams Letter from Acting City Attorney Warren advised ire appeared in
. Court Case #828227 Superior Court on 12/8/77 to argue the Writ of Certiorari on the
McLaughlin Rezone McLaughlin Rezone filed by Leslie Adams , et ux vs City of Renton.
Appeal R 001-77 The letter explained Judge' s decision that the City' s actions were
not arbitrary and capricious and therefore dismissed the Writ.
Copy of trial brief and pertinent documents included. information
Traffic Signals - Letter from Carl ''+yatt Presider•.!: of the Renton Shoi.'tHg Center, inc. ,
Renton Shopping Merchant's Association, called attention to several restrictive and .
Center unsafe features in the traffic signal control system adjacent to
the Center. (1 ) intersection of Rainier Ave. S. and S. 3rd. ; lengthen-
ing of left turn signal time and east-west walk signal time requested.
(2) Intersection of Sunset Blvd. , Langston Rd. , and Hardie St. ; re-
quested iengthing of time for both left turn signal and north-south
walk siignal . (3) Ir te 's;ection of Rainier Ave. S . and S . 4th Pl . ;
requested construction ofra left turn storage lane for northbound
traffic on Rainier Ave: S. to allow left turn into Center. MOVED
BY STREDICKE , SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINIS-
TRATION FOR RECOMMENDATION BACK TO THE RUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE.
CARRIED.
Human Rights Letter f: a..! Albert. laley, Chairperson of the Renton Hunan Rights
Ordinance and Affa rs Commission, submitted an ordinance amending Title II ,
Chapter 10 of the City Code setting forth duties and procedures of
the Human Rights And Affairs Commission. The letter explained the
two public hearings held by the commission, ordinance haVing been
drafted with assistance of former City Attorney She i „'n and City
Attorney warren . The letter no Led the Hos h i c nton r . tiuc`in Rights
Commission and attorney have deteninined it is sati "oii.ory to provide
for inter-agency cooperation in the processing of complaints . Refer-
ral to the Ways and Means Committee recommended. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND SHINPOCH; COUNCIL CONCUR AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM-
MITTEE . CARRIED. —_
Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Richard Geissler to the
Fire Chief Permanent position of Fire Chief for the City effective 1/1/78,
asking confirmation by the City Council . The letter, noted successful
completion of the six-month probationary period by Chief Geissler as
of 1/1/78. MOVED BY BRUCE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPOINT-
MENT. CARRIED.
Motion by Stredicke, second by Shinpoch, for recess , Failed.
OLD BUSINESS
Planning_and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted committee
Development report recommending that the Council refer the matter of the zoning
Committee Retort on Renton Hill to the Planning Department to review the Comprehen-
y r e\ �,ss L h he o i i • ni g
Ren�_on H111 save r'1an rhanae_, r,: .2ntly :.r_�,F.d �.v t �., ('.�ur,c; , a,l� ,_hP .Lr. r".�, r,f
Zoning the Renton Hill areadetermine those parcel i uP] bear i rig
,,1E. cr,� � � to �..
different zoning classifications than those permissible in the
amended Comprehensive Plan. The report noted the Planning Dept.
would then initiate rezoning requests where parcels do not conform
with proposed uses of the amended plan and would prepare the necessary
reports ; the Hearing Examiner to determine, after a public hearing,
whether or not the parcels identified by the Planning Department should
be rezoned. MOVED BY PERRY , SECOND STRE.DICKE COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE •
RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT C0M t ;_ T ri loon inquiry
by Councilwoman Thorpe on areas where app! : ca ;ors had been made
prior to the moratorium, Acting City Attorney Warren advised of prior
{vested rights . MOTION CARRIED.
South Renton The committee report recommended Council concurrence in the Planning
Comprehensive Commission recommendations for South Renton Comprehensive Planning
Plan Area Area subject to the follow: (1 ) Designate a lineal greenbelt area
along west side of proposed SR 515 extending southerly from S 27th
St. to SE 172nd St. ; (2) Include buffer of low density multi-family
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
•
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COPMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT,
December 19, 1977 •
•
RE: SOUTH RENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AREA
The Planning and Development Committee has completed its study regarding the
above referral and recommends Council concurrence in the Planning Commission
recommendations subject to the following and referral to the Ways & Means Committee:
(1) Designate a lineal greenbelt area along the west side of the proposed
S.R. 515 extending. southerly from South 27th Street to S.E. 172nd Street.
(2) Include a buffer of Low Density Multi-family Residential south of
S.E. 172nd Street between the Single Family Residential and Medium
•• Density Multi-family Residential.
•
(3) Shift the proposed north-south residential collector street to the
west to abutt the proposed park site.
(4) Designate the area south of Carr Road east of the existing city limits
as Public Quasi-public and Medium Density Multi-family Residential.
Designate steep slope areas as a greenbelt buffer area.
RE: REFERRAL OF ZONING FOR RENTON HILL
The Planning and Development Committee has completed its study regarding the
above referral and recommends that the City Council refer the matter of the
zoning on Renton Hill to the Planning Department.
The Planning Department will review the Comprehensive Plan changes recently
passed by the Council and the zoning of the Renton Hill. area in order to deter-
mine those parcels of land on Renton Hill bearing different zoning classifica-
cions than those permissible in the amended Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning Department will then initiate rezoning requests where parcels
do not conform with proposed uses of the amended Comprehensive Plan and prepare
• the necessary Planning Department reports. •
The Hearing Examiner will determine, after a public hearing, whether or not
the parcels identified by the Planning Department should be rezoned.
/..- ICOI•Ot.(.4)\‘‘..Y,ti-641OCk . .
Gorge Pef-r , Chairman / Barbara Shinpoch, Member
•.
, . .
Stredicke, Member
11
Renton City Council J
12/5/77 Page 5
Old Business - Continued
Repainting 3/4 MG Highlands Elevated Tank .-nd the 3 MG Mt. Olivet Reservoir.
Bid Approved Public Works Director Gonnason advised approval interpreted and
bid awarded , Attorney indicating procedure legal .
Seminar Councilwoman Thorpe called attention to Surface Water, Green River
Basin, Seminar in Auburn 12/14/77, asking Planning Director be
notified. Mayor Delaurenti noted he will be participating on the
panel .
•
Christmas Councilman Stredicke complimented Mayor and Staff on working with
Decorations Downtown Merchants on Christmas lighting change over. The Mayor
noted attempt will be made for television coverage.
Public Services Public Services Committee Chairman Bruce submitted committee report
Committee Report noted review of Brad McElroy request to connect to the City' s
sewer system and noted McElroy (:as executed a covenant to annex
and is included in the proposed Lozetti annexation for which peti-
tions are being prepared for ci rcu•i at i on. The commi ttee recom-
mended application be approved subject to limitation of single
lateral for single family unit and access to the property be
limited to a single driveway. The report also recommended notifi-
cation of adjacent property owners as to the proposal . MOVED BY
BRUCE, SECOND SHINPOCH, Council concur in the committee report.
ROLL CALL VOTE: 2-AYES: SHINPOCH AND BRUCE; 5-NO' s : PERRY , THORPE,
STREDICKE, TRIMM AND CLYMER. MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY STREDICKE ,
SECOND PERRY, CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO NOTIFY McELROY ASKING
FOR ANNEXATION PRIOR TO CONNECTION TO'SEWER SERVICE. CARRIED.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, NO FURTHER CONNECTIONS OUTSIDE THE
CiTY FOR SEWER SERVICE BE ENTERTAINED UNLESS THERE IS EXTREME,
CERTIFIED HEALTH HAZARD.* Councilwoman Thorpe noted this applies
to existing structures , no new construction being allowed to con-
Sewer Connections nect. Upon inquiry by Councilman Trim, Public Works Director
to Property Out- Gonnason noted previously adopted ,-esoiution clarifying those
Side City Limits properties adjacent to sewer line in City would be allowed to con-
Disallowed Unless nect upon findings of health hazard; these last few items before
Extreme Health the Council requiring extension of lines in order to connect.
Hazard Gonnason asked that resolution be rescinded if policy changed.
Gonnason noted need for septic tanks for new construction in event
of change of policy, noting late comer' s agreement paid in event
of connections in the past. Councilman Clymer disapproved of
septic tanks . *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE,
COUNCIL REFER SUBJECT MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.
CARRIED.
Elk Ridge Drive The Public Services Committee report recommended denial of request
Name Change to change the name of Eagle Ridge Drive to Elk Ridge Drive, suggest-
Denied ing alternate proposal to deed the entry way of the Elks Club to
the City to name " Elk Ridge Drive" or pursue other similar approach
for better identity. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
City Hall The committee report noted review of the Public Works Department
Heating System request for modification to the City Hall heating system and
Modifications installation of the Vertrex Energy Manager system; the Mayor' s
Approved Committee on Energy Conservation also reviewed the proposal and
recommended favorably. The committee report .recommended Council
concurrence in the modifications and installation and that the
matter be referred to the 'Ways and Means Committee for appropria-
tion of funds within the limitations of the existing budget.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS Councilman Perry noted review of Council procedure ordinance and
Council Procedures asked that each Council Members , the Mayor and City Clerk review
the ordinance also; requesting adherence to the rules .
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
-Ordinance #3186 The Ways and Means Committee Chairman, Earl Clymer, presented com-
Renton Hill imittee report recommending second and final readings of an ordinance
Comprehensive Planiamending the City' s Comprehensive Land Use Plan of Renton Hill area.
\f L411
Renton City Council .
. 12/5/77 Page 6
Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued
Ordinance #3186 First reading.of the. ordinance was 11/28/77. City Clerk Mea
Continued' the ordinance .des.ignating ,a'rea as single-family and ly
Renton Hill • residential , 'greenbelt 'and- recreational; also deleting Mill Ave. S
Comprehensive extension and: Grant Ave. S. as being impractical and inappropriate.
Plan Following readings , it was MOVED BY 'CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ: ROLL CALL: ALL AYES except Councilman
Bruce was not present during the Roll Call . MOTION CARRIED.
Resolution #2150 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended reading and
Housing & tion of the. following resolutions: Resolution was read ado ting
Community the 1978 Housing and Community Development Pro ram; p g
ings
Development held 11/28/77 and, l2/5/77. ' MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE,H COUNCIL
Block Grants ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. . CARRIED.
Resolution #2151 Resolution, was '•read allowing Teleprompter to merge
its Teleprompter TV companies under the name of Northwest Cablevision. - 'MOVEDsBYiary
. Merger CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
Resolution #2152 Resolution was read extending the Renton. Hill building moratorium
Moratorium
on multi-family residences for a period of 90 days. MOVED BY
Renton Hill Area CLYMER,. SECOND THORPE,
COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.
Councilman Stredicke requested that the. Administration look
• at the access problems 'on Renton' Hill ; Mayor Delaurenti assigned .
Public Works Director. MOTION ,CARRIED. ' .
Ordinance #3187 MOVED BY CLYMER, :SECOND SHINPOCH; COUNCIL RECONSIDER ACTION TAKEN
Garbage Collection 11/28/77 CONCERNING THE GARGABE ORDINANCE. . CARRIED. Following
Rate Increase readings of the ordinance,, •
MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL
First Reading -of ADOPT ORDINANCE:* Councilwoman Thorpe 'requested Administration
Ordinance 11/21 include information to residential users with billing - how to
obtain one can rate. Councilman Perry requested for the record,
percentage of increase, explaining garbage franchise stipulation
that the contract would be open for renegotiation if rates increase
above 2,0-30% in five-year period. Gonnason' explained rate increase
due to increase in County dump fees - one can 4. 1% increase; 2 can
5.6% incr.ease;. additional cans. 12% increase (within 25 ft. ) .
Gonnason ended list with 2-yard container, 22%. Councilman
Stredic.ke requested report .listing increases for various industrial
concerns 1975:-78. . Gonnason explained cost-of-living clause in
contract for drivers, which may mean increase in costs within six
months , Councilwoman Shinpoch asked the alternatives to one-bidder
award situation. Councilwoman Thorpe noted recycling studies.
ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: THORPE, SHINPOCH BRUCE AND CLYMER; 2-NO: PERRY
AND STREDICKE; 1-:ABSTAIN DUE TO INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION: TRIMM.
*MOTION CARRIED. Stredicke encouraged recycling, outlining processes. .
Executive Session MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL MEET IN EXECUTIVE FOR .THE PURPOSE OF. DISCUSSING WAGE NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Council
President Perry requested audience and Staff Members leave .the
Chambers. Time:` 1.0:30 p.m. Council convened at 10:48 p.m. All
Council Members present at Roll Call .
Greetings Council .
9 woman Thorpe extended Happy Hanukkah greetings, asking
to be noted in the .record.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL ADJOURN THE MEETING.
CARRIED. Time: 10:50 p.m.
4.4-fr_Aly (. -77?-/--/Ar.
Delores A.' Mead, City Clerk
1 / lr' e--sr,,
G.
Renton City Council
' 1 1/28/77 Page 4
OLD BUShNESS '
Planning and ` Upon presentation of Planning and Development Committee Report
Development by Chairman Perry concurring in the recommendation of the Hearing
Committee Report ! Examiner on the final plat of Farrell ' s 1st Addition, MacLand, Inc. ,
which had appeared on the Consent Agenda (Page 2) , Council Members
agreed on the procedure: When an item from the-Hearing Examiner
appears on the Consent Agenda, the Planning and Development Commit-
( tee will not make a report.
RR XX Councilman Stredicke requested information relative to railroad
; crossings , Mayor Delaurenti asked Public Works Director Gonnason
Ito check with the State Utilities Commission.
Park Budget jCouncilwoman Thorpe made inquiries of budgeted funds for Earlington
and Glencoe Parks and work accomplished and called attention to
need to complete requirements of Phase I prior to commencing pay-
ment for the Glencoe Park property, per ordinance conditions.
! Acting City Attorney Warren noted need to meet any conditions of
; the ordinance prior to transfer. Councilwoman Thorpe felt that
Marge expenditures for consultant fees was unnecessary.
Hearing Examiner r; MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, IN ORDER TO CLARIFY COUNCIL'S MOTION
Referral : OF 11/21/77 REFERRING RENTON HILL ZONING TO THE HEARING EXAMINER,
COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER ,TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
TO REPORT TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. --
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
Ways and Means Ways and. Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee
Committee Report report recommending second and final reading of an ordinance
Ordinance #3179 rezoning property located between S . 5th St. and S. 4th St. on
Malesis Rezone west side of Wells S. accross from the Renton School Administra-
R-1 to R-3 tion Bldg. , from R-1 single family to R-3. Following readings ,
South Renton area it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDI- .
(First Reading NANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: CLYMER, SHINPOCH, STREDICKE,
11/21/77) AND THORPE. Councilman Perry left the Chambers during the presen-
tation of this material and took no part. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance #3180 Ways and Means Committee report recommended the following ordinances
Membership of be placed on second and final readings , first reading 11/21/77:
Board of Ethics An ordinance relating to the membership of the Board of Ethics.
Following readings, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT
THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3181 An ordinance authorizing acquisition of property, including condem-
Property nation proceedings, for Senior Citizens Center and a Park for the
Handicapped Park & handicapped. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
Senior Citizens ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Ordinance #3182 • An ordinance was read ordering construction and installation of
L. I .D. #307 street and appurtenances thereto - Raymond Ave. S.W. running south-
Raymond Ave. SW erly from S.W. 16th St: MOVED BY CLYMER, .SECOND PERRY , COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: PERRY , CLYMER,
SHINPOCH, STREDICKE; 1-NO: THORPE. MOTION CARRIED.
Ordinance #3183 An ordinance was presented specifying and adopting a system or plan
Waterworks Utility for making additions and betterments to the, waterworks utility of
the City including the sewerage system. Following readings , it was
MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH , COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Recess Moved by Stredicke, Second Shinpoch, Council recess for 10 minutes.
Roll Call : 2-Ayes : Shinpoch, Stredicke; 3-No' s Perry, Clymer and
Thorpe. Motion Failed.
Garbage Rate An ordinance was presented revising the garbage collection rates
Ordinance for residential , business and commercial accounts . Rates increased
due to increase dump fees by King County as reported by the Public
Works Director and that change from volume to weight effective
1/1/78. Following readings , it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH,
Renton City Council
11/28/77 Page 5
Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued
Garbage Rate COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 3-AYES: CLYMER,
Ordinance STREDICKE, THORPE; 2-NO'S: PERRY AND SHINPOCH. According to
Continued statute, majority vote of Council membership is required to
pass an ordancl into' law. MOTION FAILED. Ordinance returned to
the Ways and Means Committee for one week.
Renton Hill The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading and referral
Comprehensive Plan back to committee of the following ordinances:
Ordinance An ordinance was presented amending the City' s Comprehensive Land
Use Plan, Maps and data relating to Renton Hill vicinity. Follow-
ing reading, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER
ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Limited G.O. Bonds An ordinance was presented providing for the issuance and sale of
Senior Center $900,000 par value "Limited General Obligation Bonds , 1978"
providing a part of funds for cost of land acquisition and con-
struction of a Senior Citizens Center and appurtenances. Follow-
ing reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL
REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Substitute
motion by Thorpe, to advance the ordinance to second and final
readings, failed for lack of a second. Councilwoman Seymour-
Thorpe then stated for the record, Council has been advised
that interest rates will not be declining, but increasing, that
early adoption would mean lower interest; also that public has ex-
pressed opinions at committee and council meetings , that the only
objections received were from people outside the City limits and
urged Council action. MOTION CARRIED returning ordinance to the
Ways and Means Committee.
Resolution #2149 The Ways and Means Committee recommended reading and adoption of
Final Plat a resolution which approved MacPherson' s Inc. , Ruddell 's 2nd
Ruddell ' s 2nd Addn. Addition final plat FP-087-77; property located at the Northeast
corner of Monroe Ave. N.E. and N.E. 10th St. Following reading,
it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION
AS READ. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd.S. , inquired regarding bonds for
the Senior Citizen Center, being advised by Councilman Clymer
that general obligation bonds are voted by citizens for property
Senior Center Bonds tax, however, that councilmanic or limited general obligation
bonds which were before the Council tonight and will be presented
next week, are paid from the City's general revenue and are
presented to the Council for approval .
Rolling Hills Jim McClelland, 1922 Jones Ct. S.E. , representing Rolling Hills
Moratorium Homeowners Assoc. inquired re committee discussion of moratorium,
being advised by Committee Chairman Perry of the schedule. (Attached)
1978 Budget Charles Shane, 3003 Mt. View N. , made inquiries of the 1978 budget
and asked that B & 0 tax be adopted.
Executive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SES-
SION IN THE 6TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. CARRIED. The Council
Members left the Chambers at 10:10 p.m. and returned at 11 :00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: All Members present as previously shown. Motion by
Stredicke, Second Shinpoch, to adjourn the meeting, failed.
MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND NOT
OBSERVE 11 :00 p.m. CLOSING RULE. CARRIED.
Council Position Councilman Perry expressed disappointment that newly elected Coun-
Filled cilman Thomas Trimm was unable to attend meeting for swearing in;
Thomas Trimm inquiring concerning any date requirement for certification. Moved
by Stredicke, Second Thorpe, continue meeting to next week. SUB-
STITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL APPOINT THOMAS
TRIMM TO FILL VACANT COUNCIL POSITION, FORMERLY HELD BY WILLIAM
GRAN. CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.
11 :13 p.m.
Delores A. Mead, City Clerk
`EXP111, 26 CITY OF RENTON
WARRANT DISTRIBUTION 11/21/77
FUND TOTAL WARRANTS
MACHINE VOIDS: NO.# 15999 — #1.6002 •
CURRENT FUND $27,551,68
PARKS AND RECREATION FUND •6j751s69
ARTERIAL STREET FUND $11702
STREET FUND e19,9521,91
LIBRARY FUND $33,40
STREET FORWARD THRUST 6176.579.72
MAIN FIRE STATION CONSTR. :/ EDA 0229622
CEDAR RIVER TRAIL SYSTEM / EDA $11, 419 0 81
WATERWORKS UTILITIY FUND S66, 176127
AIRPORT FUND $685198
1976 WATER 6 SEWER CONSTR 01.860,29
EGUtPMENT RENTAL 1112, 156.88
FIREMEN PENSION $15.4'
TOTAL OF ALL WARRANTS $311.53101
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE OF THE
RENTON CITY COUNCIL, HAVING RECEIVED DEPARTMENTAL CERTIFICATION THAT
MERCHANDISE AND/OR SERVICES WAVE BEEN RECEIVED OR RENDERED, DO HEREBY
APPROVE FOR PAYMENT VOUCHERS NO, 16003 THROUGH NO. 16098 IN THE AMOUNT
OF P311,531 .01 TM S 28TM DAY OF NOVEMBER 1977•
MEMBER • w ' •
CHAIRMAN
COMMITTEE
-6--
L. I .D.# 302
MEMBER 0 a .42 o w .
REVENUE WARRANT NO.#R-8 $8, 100.00
- CASH WARRANT NO.#C—I0 $8, 100.00
•
- o THE CITY OF RENTON
z�r MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055
o
� .ALL ,• '•'��
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(t� 235-2550
P• (0 SEPIV'
October 14 , 1977
The Honorable C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor
Members of the City Council
Renton , Washington
RE : PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ,
RENTON HILL PLANNING AREA (THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY
FAI-405 ON THE WEST , CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH , THE
HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST , AND THE
POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH)
Dear Mayor and Council Members :
The Planning Commission submits for your consideration recom-
mendations regarding the above described area . This action is
pursuant to the City Council referral and request of June 6 ,
1977 .
The Planning Commission has conducted a series of public
hearings and work meetings regarding the Renton Hill area ,
including a detailed analysis of land use , circulation , and
community facilities . The analysis and recommendation of the
Comprehensive Planning Committee is submitted in the attached
report dated October 12 , 1977 .
At the conclusion of the Planning Commission public hearing
of October 12th , the Planning Commission concurred in the
recommendations of the Comprehensive Planning Committee and
forwarded the committee report to you for your consideration .
It is recommended that the City Council set November 21st as
a public hearing date on the said recommendations . Your con-
currence is respectfully requested .
Very tru y you s ,
i
ardon Y . is en
P anning rector
GYE : wr
Attachments
•
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
OCTOBER 12 , 1977
TO : Planning Commission Members
FROM: Clark Teegarden , Chairman
Comprehensive Planning Committee
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL AREA
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING
INTRODUCTION :
By action of the Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting
on the above subject matter, the Comprehensive Planning Committee
was requested to study the area in question and report back to the
Commission on October 12 , 1977 . The attached public hearing notice
(public hearing , September 14 , 1977 ) describes the area to be con-
sidered and is generally defined as the Renton Hill Comprehensive
Planning Area . (Refer to Public Hearing Notice. )
For the purposes of the Committee ' s deliberations , the Comprehensive
Plan is defined as the offical statement of the City of Renton
establishing major policies concerning desirable future development.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - DEFINITION AND PURPOSE :
The Comprehensive Plan consists of the Goals , Objectives , and Poli-
cies ; Land Use Element; Circulation Element; Community Facilities
Element ; and Definitions . Proposed developments should be reviewed
against the Comprehensive Plan to insure that growth is consistent
with the Plan.
The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are :
To improve the physical and social environment of the
city as a setting for human activities - to make it more
functional , beautiful , decent , healthful , interesting ,
and efficient;
. k UBLIC NOTiuE
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY. OF RENTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON
SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AT 8:00 P,M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
DESCRIBED BELOW:
•
PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA
IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE '
EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH.
} F ilyv
1 .roo•d' i L _ :' 1 L: E;`1 : : P' /. '' ›,,;,;.,/", \!`N, `
[.,r7c:'.:1.q.;_,,•• je, ;•• If i.,.;_,:l 1,,,,_,,_- .., • ;; ,,,•iv.,„ :
4(
, !i .i i 2: iil ii i!-Vt:I': .: i,e•-':?7'.: it s,-,1,; .i,:-::1,.:--::. 1 --,,,
e�. I°`�as .''s ;
��•• ' _ ? ' r' \
tj`' If * `tali 4 p v g-; 1 11` j, , ' f;-' �il --1". a•'• 1; 1.
!I
r.
•
•
V.
2:1-1
t L� '- _ , ,a ------— ---
/,`' ate _ :: '�'•..' �...} - \-\
j".J /- w iv '• .,.'I•, iF—I .^ I 1 .. M I •..1) . , �Q.
i� al 4 1 r „1 .r .
.- i ,
fi j / ' '1, :l' / •-1-� • L_1.c_' _ -, ��
1 //2.V/
ss
fj L J "i it
Pr
/--7 ,,.:::';/,', t,-,7,--„, - ,, --"--• . _.__- -------i `` LJ
^' 00r1N
;-; ;),-• r
1 t • !L. %/ i I amp-ter- ��".
e, ' F--I',
rr-f 'G I -2=-'1 s, I ------- I
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT ,
COMMENTS IN WRITING,
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT:
CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S.
RENTON, WA, 98055
•Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Two
1 To promote the public interest , the interest of the city
at large as well as the interests of individuals , or
special groups ;
• To facilitate the democratic determination and implementa-
tion of city policies on development ;
1 To effect political and technical coordination in
development;
To inject long-range considerations into the determination
of short-range actions ; and
1 To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on
the making of political decisions on the development of the
city.
The Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as a guide to help resolve
some of the development problems confronting municipal officials and
the people they represent. The Plan takes into account existing con-
ditions and future needs , and attempts to express the best reasonable
consensus that can be achieved at a given time as to the character
and direction of future growth .
The Plan is of necessity general in its proposals . It must be flexible ,
since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect
the community . The Plan is not a zoning ordinance , although it makes
significant recommendations for future land use . The Plan is not pre-
cise. It does not represent engineering accuracy , nor does it claim
to predict exactly the future use of every parcel of property , or
insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan .
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
'October 12 , 1977
Page Three
In order for the Plan to maintain effectiveness , it should be reviewed
periodically. Conditions might change and unforeseen events may occur
which might necessitate a re-evaluation.
BACKGROUND:
As background to the study of the area in question , the Committee con-
ducted a field trip of the area involved and studied in detail the
existing land use , the characteristics of the existing development , and
the physical features of the land, including topography and drainage .
During the course of the work sessions by the committee , representatives
from property owners in the Hill area were present and provided input
in the matters discussed . The matter of access was considered in some
detail in terms of the existing street rights-of-way, traffic circulation ,
existing street conditions , the parking and access problems to individual
properties , as well as the matter of general traffic circulation .
The study area for comprehensive planning purposes overlapped into
adjacent areas ; and, therefore , the study of the committee encompasses
areas beyond the immediate boundaries of the Renton Hill area , particu-
larly as it relates to traffic circulation , potential development ,
need for community facilities , and general area-wide impact of future
development.
The consideration of the committee was basically restricted to con-
sideration of the Comprehensive Plan elements : land use , circulation ,
and community facilities . In regard to said elements , the natural
characteristics of the area were also considered .
•
JComprehensive Planning Committee Report
• October 12 , 1977
Page Four
LAND USE ELEMENT:
FINDINGS :
1 . The Renton Hill area is primarily a single family residential
neighborhood with some limited apartment and duplex use inter-
mixed. The extent of multi -family residential development is
limited at this time and is primarily concentrated along Mill
Avenue South and located westerly of Cedar.
2. Physical characteristics of the area indicate that, while an older
area of the community, the area is basically sound in terms of
both building and general physical potential for upgrading . This
potential is presently being recognized by many property owners
•
in the area , and the area is considered a desirable single family
residential neighborhood.
3. While the area has been in a state of transition , with increased
land values , the physical amenities of the Hill area , such as view ,
makes the area highly desirable for residential development.
4 . The existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for Renton
Hill is primarily single family residential with low and medium
density multi-family residential designations between Mill Avenue
South and Cedar Avenue South and extending southerly to and includ-
ing a larger tract of medium density multi -family residential
located at the southwesterly edge of the Hill area . The hillside
areas to the north are presently designated as greenbelt , with
the existing industrial development adjacent to the railroad
right-of-way and a low density multi -family designation to the
'Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
' • October 12 , 1977
-Page Five
north adjacent to the Cedar River.
5 . The area includes several large tracts of undeveloped areas ,
which represent both potential single family and multi -family
residential development. Development in accordance with the
present plan would result in increased land use densities .
6 . The Committee also reviewed the geological conditions of the
Hill area , including consideration regarding mines previously
located in the area. It was initially recognized that the Hill
has large underlying coal beds , some of these beds having been
mined-out. Said coal beds represent not only a future energy
resource potential but also a hazard to any surface development
in terms of possible mine subsidance. The extent of such
development hazard is unknown and will vary with location . It
is recognized, however, such hazards must be considered in
terms of existing and future development.
CIRCULATION:
1 . The Committee initially recognizes that the present circulation
to Renton Hill is restricted to one access point (at Third and
Mill ) , which essentially creates a large cul -de-sac-type situation .
2 . The present 40 foot street rights-of-way restrict access and
limit parking , particularly in that area north of South 7th
Street . The existing topography precludes any substantial
improvement of existing rights-of-way to allow improved access
and parking.
• Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
. October 12 , 1977
Page Six
3 . The parking for the residential uses is primarily on-street
rather than off-street; and it is recognized that topography
limitations preclude, in many cases , development of acceptable
off-street parking spaces .
4. Increased traffic has occurred as the result of the extensive
use of Phillip Arnold Park located at the top of the Hill .
This impact is particularly noticeable on Renton Avenue . On-street
parking has also impacted the adjacent residential neighborhood .
5 . The existing Arterial Street Plan indicates the extension of
Mill Avenue extending in a southeast direction , connecting to a
secondary arterial serving the Tiffany Park area . The present
Plan also projects the extension of Grant Avenue South from South
11th to Puget Drive.
6 . The extension of Mill Avenue South with the connection as proposed
does not appear to be physically feasible due to the existing devel -
opment that has occurred and the steep topography.
7 . New development of any type would, in the opinion of the committee ,
further impact the existing circulation system unless alternative
means of access were provided to serve the area . The Committee
further recognizes , however, that providing additional access
could further compound the existing problem and make the situation
more critical .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . The existing park has been utilized as a facility serving beyond
the immediate neighborhood. The basic result has been an increase
•:
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Seven
in traffic circulation problems beyond those created by the
immediate residents of the Hill area .
2 . The existing park facility , however, is fully developed and is
used intensively by the community at large . The Renton School Districi
presently has a 10 acre elementary school site located easterly
of said park. A school development at this site is not contem-
plated at this time or in the near future, due to the limited
elementary population that might potentially attend said school .
NATURAL SYSTEMS :
1 . The Hill area , due to its nature , has large undeveloped hillside
areas with steep slopes , providing a natural greenbelt drainage
system.
2 . Disturbance through new development represents a potential hazard
in terms of slides and increased runoff problems .
RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based on its analysis , the Committee recommends as follows :
LAND USE:
1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill area ,
the Committee recommends that the Hill area north of the Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission right-of-way be
designated as single family residential .
2. The steep hillside areas , powerline rights-of-way , and natural
drainage courses be established as greenbelt areas , in addition
to those presently designated on the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan .
•
` ' Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Eight
CIRCULATION :
1 . The land use designations as reflected in the existing Compre-
hensive Plan was based upon provision of additional access to the
Renton Hill area to the south and southeast . The extension of
Mill Avenue South is not physically feasible ; and , therefore ,
it is recommended by the Committee that such designation on the
Arterial Street Plan be deleted.
2 . Extensive input on the part of the residents in the Hill area
indicates the desire to continue the limited access to the Hill
(Third and Mill ) as it is presently constituted. The purpose of
such limitation is to enhance the amenities of the Hill area as
a residential community and preclude through access . It is ,
therefore , further recommended that the proposed Grant Avenue
connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of
access to the Hill .
3. It is recognized that improved access will be necessary to serve
the properties to the south and southeast of the Renton Hill area
at such time as they are developed. The intent of the Committee ' s
recommendations is that such access be provided from the south .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . Retain the present community facilities designations for the Renton
Hill area , including the park and school site , recognizing that the
use of the school site for an elementary school may or may not be
feasible in the near future.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Nine
2. The Committee further recommends that the City pursue the possibil -
ity of expansion of Phillip Arnold Park to the southeast , since it
appears that the potential area would allow reasonable expansion
of said facility.
3 . The area designated low density multi -family residential adjacent
to the Cedar River north of the railroad be redesignated future
recreation .
Renton City Council
11/21/77 Page 2 - • : ,
Public Hearing - Continued
Comprehensive Transamerica Development h letter from Patricia Parks , Attorney,
Plan for objected to change i , col. -- sive plan designating the- Renton Hills
Renton Hill area as single fa ► . , residential area (R-1 ) , noting Transamerica
Continued owns 10. 05 acres at the sou end of Cedar Ave. S. designated as R-3.
The letter explained proposed sale of 6.67 acres for 90 .unit four-
plex condominium and exp ained degree of steepness of property and
that property abuttsFA -405, making the property suitable for multi-
family residential u - . The letter alleged loss of value of property
in change from R-3 o R-1 ; an attached traffic study claimed 50% use
of optimum design for Cedar Ave. S. , suggesting means for increasing
efficiency of t .ffic circulation, such as one way street and removing
one 62 ft. sid-'walk. Planning Director Ericksen used charts , maps and
slides to present review of area, the nature of Comprehensive Plan,
and Planning Commission recommendation, also distributing maps and
written recommendation for audience use. Mr. Ericksen explained the
land use elem- ' findings , circulation and community facilities, and
recommendations of the Plannin Commission, for single family residen-
tial for area north of Puget So nd transmission right-of-way; add
greenbelt area-steep hillside . eas, powerline and natural drainage
courses; delete Mill Ave. S. tention and Grant Ave. connection with
continued limited access; ar'•a north of railroad designated multi-
family be resignated as fut e recreation.
Continued -- Persons present speakin; in favor of Planning Commission recommendation:
Historic Kathy Keolker; Claude Rogers , 420 Renton Ave. S. ; Ruth Larson, 714
Unique High Ave. S. ; Ethel 'elban, 508 Cedar Ave. S. ; Jim Breda, 1002 Grant
Neighborhood Ave. S. ; Mario Got 1005 High Ave. S. Persons opposing recommendation:
Desires Bill Montangne,Vi ,e-President Transamerica Development Co. ; Gene
Single-Family Farrell , 11112 'ainier Ave. S. , developer and purchaser of Trans-
Residential america property; Patricia Parks , 118 N. 40th, Seattle, Persons
Area present spea ng against change in zoning of Mill Ave. `S. from multi-
family to si gle-family residential : Mrs. Ray Hansen, 336 ill Ave.
S. ; Anita T elander, 512 Mill Ave. S. ; Paul Von Beck, 18184MS.E. 41st
Place, Iss•,quah, Wash. Also speaking in favor of the recommendation:
Robert Mc:eth, Attorney for Renton Hill Community Association, 505B
South 3rd. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING. oRRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN PLANNING +uu NDATION ELIMINATING EXTENSION OF MILL
AVE. S. AND GRANT AVE. S. , CHA .ING DESIGNATION OF ALL OF RENTON HILL
FROM MULTI-FAMILY TO SINGLE-FAMILY WITH EXCEPTION OF MILL AVENUE SOUTH
TO SOUTH SEVENTH STREET AND THA THE AREA VHICH IS OCCUPIED BY GLADDING
McBEAN (Interpace) BE DESIGNAT'D AS RECREATIONAL. CARRIED. See later.
Recess MOVED BY BRUCE, SECOND STREt CKE, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Council
recessed at 10:01 p.m. and reconvened at 10: 14 p.m. Roll Call : All
Council Members present.
Renton Hill MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF RENTON
Zoning HILL ZONING TO THE L' D USE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED. MOVED BY
PERRY, SECOND CLYME', COUNCIL REFER MATTER OF ORDINANCE AND MORITORIUM
Renton Hill (ON BUILDING OF MUL 'I-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE RENTON HILL AREA)
Moratorium TO THE WAYS AND MANS COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.
Councilman Stred'cke noted Consent Agenda item - letter from Rolling
Rolling Hills Hills Homeowners Association •sted moratorium on multi-family
Moratorium building for 90 •: _ •ntil Planning Commission completes study of
area east of Renton Hill bounded b, power line transmission on North,
Benson Road on West, Puget Drive en South and Edmonds S.E. on the East.
(See later Consent Agenda) M0V 0 BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, AMEND
MOTION TO INCLUDE LETTER FRO OLLING HILLS HOMEOWNERS AND MORATORIUM
IN THE REFERRAL. THE AME IiNG MOTION CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED,
CARRIED. (See Page 6 and age 7. )
ORDINANCES MOVED BY CLYMER, SECON SHINPOCH, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE
AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCES AND RE.SOLU ONS TO BE READ AT THIS TIME. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND STREDICKE, Co ncil go into Executive Session to consider property
value required prio to adoption of resolution. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND SHINPOCH, MA TER OF EXECUTIVE SESSION BE TABLED UNTIL NEW
BUSINESS ON THE AGEN ARR-I-ED: MOTION TO SUSPEND RULES, CARRIED.
(V-0V
.- ►Y
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
November 21 , 1977 Municipal Building
Monday , 8: 00' P . M . Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the
regular meeting to order.
ROLL CALL OF GEORGE J. PERRY, Council President; EARL CLYMER, KENNETH D. BRUCE,
COUNCIL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE.
STAFF IN CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, Acting City Attorney;
ATTENDANCE TED BENNETT, Deputy Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GORDON
ERICKSEN, Planning Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director;
RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; CAPT. BOURASA, Police Representative;
DONALD CUSTER, Administrative Assistant.
PRESS GREG ANDERSON and CATHY BURKE, Renton Record Chronicle.
MINUTE APPROVAL Councilwoman Thorpe requested addition Page 3, Paragraph -8, Final
Estimate Asphalt Resurfacing, Line 11 ; add "and that project meets
City standards." Councilman Stredicke requested Page 4, last para-
graph., first line - Remove word "committee" and add "Staff." MOVED
BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES WITH CORRECTIONS
STATED.. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Council Candidate Elect C. Shane, 3003 Mountain View Ave. N. , objected
to Council action as reported in 11/20 newspaper article that alleged
Uniformed layoff_of.police and fire personnel in regards to contract negotiations.
Personnel E. Kunstle, 1015 Jones Ave. S.E, commented on same newspaper article
objecting to police contract item re bonus pay for passing of physical .
Heather Downs Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave.. S.E. , recalled Heather Downs sewer LID
Sewer LID #297 #297 matter under discussion 11/14/77, asked reconfirmation of original
plan approved by Council 3/7/77. Marlene Vickers , 13439 S.E. 141st,
Reconfirmed Co-Chairman of S.O.S. reported extensive study made and findings that
Council Approval canyon area in question unsuitable for sewer trunk placement. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE,. SUBJECT OF HEATHER DOWNS AREA SEWERS BE
BROUGHT TO THE COUNCIL FLOOR. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke reported
distribution of packet of information on subject. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL RECONFIRM EARLIER ACTION OF MARCH 7, 1977 ON
' HEATHER DOWN SEWER LID #297. CARRIED.
Senior Center Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd. S. , inquired when Council would dis-
cuss the Senior Citizens Center, being advised of planned discussion at
7:30 p.m. budget hearing 11/23/77.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and pub-
Renton Hill lished according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to
Comprehensive consider the Planning Commission recommendation of the Comprehensive
Plan Plan of the Renton Hill 'Planning Area (that area generally bound by .
FAI-405 on the West, Cedar River on the North, the hillside and undevel-
oped area on the East and the powerline right-of-way on the South. ,
Letter from Planning Director Ericksen submitted Planning Commission
recommendations per Council request of 6/6/77. The letter explained
the, process of hearings and work meetings with detailed analysis of._
land use, circulation and community facilities; explaining the Commis-
sion had adopted the Comprehensive Planning Committee recommendation
at conclusion of public hearing 10/12/77. Letter from Kathy Keolker,
532 Cedar Ave. S. , President, Renton Hill Community Association, sub-
mitted statement listing concerns of Renton Hill residents and favored
the Planning Commission recommendation re 'the Comprehensive Plan.
Petition bearing 227 signatures of Renton Hill residents and property
owners expressed opposition to the building of any additional multiple
dwellings at the upper end of Cedar Ave.. S. or any adjacent area that
would require access through our community.. (Petition originally filed
with Planning Commission 8/26/77.) Petition bearing 28 signatures pro-
tested rezoning Mill Ave. S. from R-3 multi-family residential to R-1
single-family, having been so zoned since 1964. Document prepared by
Renton City Council
11/2107 Page 2
Public Hearing - Continued
Comprehensive Transamerica Development with letter from Patricia Parks , Attorney,
Plan for objected to change in comprehensive plan designating the- Renton Hills
Renton Hill area as single family residential area (R-1 ) ,_noting Transamerica
Continued owns 10. 05 acres at the south end of Cedar Ave. S. designated as R-3.
The letter explained proposed sale of 6.67 acres for 90 unit four-
plex condominium and explained degree of steepness of property and
that property abuttsFAl-405, making the property suitable for multi-
family residential use. The letter alleged loss of value of property
in change from R-3 to R-1 ; an attached traffic study claimed 50% use
of optimum design for Cedar Ave. S. , suggesting means for increasing
efficiency of traffic circulation, such as one way street and removing
one 62 ft. sidewalk. Planning Director Ericksen used charts , maps and
slides to present review of area, the nature of Comprehensive Plan,
and Planning Commission recommendation, also distributing maps and
written recommendation for audience use. Mr. Ericksen explained the
land use element findings , circulation and community facilities, and
recommendations of the Planning Commission, for single family residen-
tial for area north of Puget Sound transmission right-of-way; add
greenbelt area-steep hillside areas, powerline and natural drainage
courses; delete Mill Ave. S. extention and Grant Ave. connection with
continued limited access; area north of railroad designated multi-
family be res.ignated as future recreation.
Continued -- Persons present speaking in favor of Planning Commission recommendation:
Historic Kathy Keolker; Claude Rogers , 420 Renton Ave. S. ; Ruth Larson, 714
Unique. High Ave. S. ; Ethel Telban, 508 W . ; Jim Breda, 1002 Grant
Neighborhood Ave. S. ; Mario Gotti , 1005 Hi e. S. is ons opposing recommendation:
Desires Bill Montangne,Vice-Presiden r a ,.art 'i :a, lk elopment Co. ; Gene
Single-Family Farrell , 11112 Rainier Ave. . -1 r an* urchaser of Trans-
Residential america property; Patricia or ,. . ' lth'Z eattle, Persons
Area present speaking against ch IP/O of q 1 Ave. -S. from multi- .
family to single-family resi 'ntii'1 ✓/i�t R ansen, 336 Mill Ave.
S. ; Anita Thelander, 512 Mill ' e. �' '.•04Paul, y Beck, 18184 S.E. 41st
Place, Issaquah, Wash. Also sp d(�n of the recommendation:
Robert McBeth, Attorney for Rento ` mmunity Association, 505B
South 3rd. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ELIMINATING EXTENSION OF MILL
AVE. S. AND GRANT AVE. S. , CHANGING DESIGNATION OF ALL OF RENTON HILL
FROM MULTI-FAMILY TO SINGLE-FAMILY TH EXCEPTION OF MILL AVENUE SOUTH
TO SOUTH SEVENTH STREET AND THAT TH AREA j:JHICH IS OCCUPIED BY GLADDING
McBEAN (Interpace) BE DESIGNATED AS RECREATIONAL. CARRIED. See later.
Recess MOVED BY BRUCE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Council
recessed at 10:01 p.m. and reconvened at 10:14 p.m. Roll Call : All
Council Members present.
Renton Hill MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF RENTON
Zoning HILL ZONING TO THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED. MOVED BY
PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER MATTER OF ORDINANCE AND MORITORIUM
Renton Hill (ON BUILDING OF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE RENTON HILL AREA)
Moratorium JA THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.
Councilman Stredicke noted Consent Agenda item - letter from Rolling
Rolling Hills Hills Homeowners Association requested moratorium on multi-family
Moratorium building for 90 days or until Planning Commission completes study of
area east of Renton Hill bounded by power line transmission on North,
Benson Road on West, Puget Drive on South and Edmonds S.E. on the East.
(See later Consent Agenda) MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, AMEND
MOTION TO INCLUDE LETTER FROM ROLLING HILLS HOMEOWNERS AND MORATORIUM
IN THE REFERRAL. THE AMENDING MOTION CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED,
CARRIED. (See Page 6 and Page 7. )
ORDINANCES MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE
AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS TO BE READ AT THIS TIME. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND STREDICKE, Council go into Executive Session to consider property
value required prior to adoption of resolution. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND SHINPOCH, MATTER OF EXECUTIVE SESSION BE TABLED UNTIL NEW
BUSINESS ON THE AGENDA. CARRIED. MOTION TO SUSPEND RULES, CARRIED.
RENTON CITY COUNCIL •
Regular Meeting
November 21 , 1977 Municipal Building
Monday , 8: 00 P . M . ,Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the
regular meeting to order.
ROLL CALL OF GEORGE J. PERRY, Council President; EARL CLYMER, KENNETH D. BRUCE,
COUNCIL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE.
STAFF IN CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, Acting City Attorney;
ATTENDANCE TED BENNETT, Deputy Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City; Clerk; GORDON
ERICKSEN, Planning Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director;
RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; CAPT. BOURASA, Police Representative;
DONALD CUSTER, Administrative Assistant.
PRESS GREG ANDERSON and CATHY BURKE, Renton Record Chronicle.
MINUTE APPROVAL Councilwoman Thorpe requested addition Page 3, Paragraph 8, Final
Estimate Asphalt Resurfacing, Line 11 ; add "and that project meets
City standards." Councilman Stredicke requested Page 4, last para-
graph, first line - Remove word "committee" and add "Staff." MOVED
BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES WITH CORRECTIONS
STATED. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Council Candidate Elect C. Shane, 3003 Mountain View Ave. N. , objected
to Council action as reported in 11/20 newspaper article that alleged
Uniformed layoff_of police and fire personnel in regards to contract negotiations.
Personnel E. Kunstle, 1015 Jones Ave. S. E, commented on same newspaper article
objecting to police contract item re bonus pay for passing of physical .
Heather Downs Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. S. E. , recalled Heather Downs sewer LID
Sewer LID #297 #297 matter under discussion 11/14/77, asked reconfirmation of original
plan approved by Council 3/7/77. Marlene Vickers , 13439 S.E. 141st,
Reconfirmed Co-Chairman of S.O.S. reported extensive study made and findings that
Council Approval canyon area in question unsuitable for sewer trunk placement. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, SUBJECT OF HEATHER DOWNS AREA SEWERS BE
BROUGHT TO THE COUNCIL FLOOR. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke reported
distribution of packet of information on subject. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL RECONFIRM EARLIER ACTION OF MARCH 7, 1977 ON
HEATHER DOWN SEWER LID #297. CARRIED.
Senior Center Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd. S. , inquired when Council would dis-
cuss the Senior Citizens Center, being advised of planned discussion at
{ 7:30 p.m. budget hearing 11/23/77.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and pub-
Renton Hill lished according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to
Comprehensive ' consider the Planning Commission recommendation of the Comprehensive
Plan , Plan of the Renton Hill Planning Area (that area generally bound by
FAI-405 on the West, Cedar River on the North, the hillside and undevel-
o.ped area on the East and the powerline right-of-way on the South.
Letter from Planning Director Ericksen submitted Planning Commission
recommendations per Council request of 6/6/77. The letter explained
the process of hearings and work meetings with detailed analysis of
land use, circulation and community facilities; explaining the Commis=
sion had adopted the Comprehensive Planning Committee recommendation
i at conclusion of public hearing 10/12/77. Letter from Kathy Keolker,
532 Cedar Ave. S. , President, Renton Hill Community Association, sub-
mitted statement listing concerns of Renton Hill residents and favored
the Planning Commission recommendation re the Comprehensive Plan.
Petition bearing 227 signatures of Renton Hill residents and property
owners expressed opposition to the building of any additional multiple
dwellings at the upper end of Cedar Ave. S. or any adjacent area that
would require access through our community. (Petition originally filed
with Planning Commission 8/26/77.) Petition bearing 28 signatures pro-
tested rezoning Mill Ave. S. from R-3 multi-family residential to R-1
single-family, having been so zoned since 1964. Document prepared by
•
•
RENTON HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Concer s for our neighborhood
1. T affic Volume - The numbers of vehicles using Renton Hill
streets cause severe congestion at times. An increase in
traffic volume would be impossible to handle. The following
traffic counts are from city records.
1972 - The pipeline road was open during the Boeing slump.
Count taken on S. 3rd east of Mill for 24 hours.
Results: Eastbound - 1279, Westbound - 1466.
1973 - The pipeline road was closed. Same location for
24 hours.
Results: Eastbound - 716, Westbound - 831 .
When the pipeline road was open, traffic volume dramatically
increased and residents requested closure of the road due
to the many other problems caused by the increase in traffic.
2. Parking - On street parking is mandatory for most residents.
Those who have garages have realized that they were not
built for modern day cars.
3. Street Width - The streets are not adequate for safe passage
of two cars going opposite directions unless one pulls over
to the side to allow the other to pass. According to city
ordinances, residential streets must be at least 50 feet wide
and neighborhood collector streets at least 60 feet wide.
Cedar Avenue (where the proposed development would be) has
a 40 foOt right of way but the actual street width is only
26* feet. Cedar Avenue was improved with an L.I .D. last
year and we are now paying for a new, substandard street
because there is simply not enough room to widen the street.
4. Access - Although we have only one access, past experience
has shown that another access creates more problems for us
than it solves. It makes our community a thoroughfare for
residents in other areas and causes extreme congestion.
We prefer to live with just one access.
.Page 2
• Renton Hill concerns
5. Safety - Pedestrian safety is adequate if there is a single
access point. Fire safety is assured by a mutual aid agreement
with Fire. District #40 who will come through the gate at the
top of the Hill if the city is unable to respond.
6. Alleys - Alleys are inadequate to develop for major use due
to width, grade and no right of way through many back yards.
7. Crime Rate. - At the present time we enjoy the lowest crime
rate in the city of Renton. There is rarely a serious
disturbance on the Hill. From the records of the Renton
Police Department, the following are .the last statistics
kept on crime rate by neighborhood.
1976 Number of calls
January 9
February , 10
1,11 -en-' March , 14
April 12
May 6
June 11
July 18
TOTAL - 7 months 80 calls
Most of these complaints were nuisance' calls i.e. kids throwing
rocks, cars parked over 24 hours,. etc. In comparison with
other areas for the month of July, the Highlands had 36 calls
and the downtown area had 94 calls. Renton Hill had 14 less
calls in 7 months than the adjacent downtown area had in one
f. month. Since the Hill is directly adjacent to the downtown
business district, it is unusual to have such a low crime rate.
8. Children's Safety - Since there is no other access, our children
enjoy the safety of knowing most of the people who come on
the Hill. Unfamiliar cars are easily spotted and there are
few strangers.
9. School Bussing - There is no elementary school within walking .
distance of Renton Hill so the children catch the bus from
the park at the top of the Hill. The Renton School District
not allow its buses to run on the Hill because it is
Page 3
• 'Renton Hill concerns
too dangerous because of the steep grade. It is unsafe for
children to wait for the bus at the bottom of the Hill due
to the railroad track and the traffic. A surge in population
would compound the bussing problem.
10. Property Value - The Hill has become a desirable place to
live due to the character of the neighborhood, our single
family status and our view property. There are few vacant
houses which adds to the safety and appearance of the neighborhood. .
11 . Quality of the Neighborhood - We feel nothing will be gained
by changing the quality of the neighborhood by the addition
of multi-family housing. We have a very unique neighborhood.
It is old, well established and has historical value. In
fact, a picture of one home is shown in the book Renton-
Prom. Coal 'To Jetp. There are many second and third generation
families on the Hill today which is unusual in our highly
mobile society. There is pride of ownership which shows up
in the vast remodeling activity on the Hill. People choose
to keep an older home and restore or remodel it because they.
like living on Renton Hill and they are unable to duplicate
the atmosphere in another neighborhood. We are one of the
oldest residential communities in the city and we are proud'
that. our homes have stood the test of time. There is value
in repairing old homes rather than tearing them down, to build
new ones. Unlike many older neighborhoods, ours is being
revitalized and is not deteriorating.
12, Quiet - We have a quiet and peaceful neighborhood which is
no small accomplishment considering our proximity to the
downtown area, Interstate 405 and the railroad tracks.
13. Community Facilities - Philip Arnold Park is adequate to
provide for our needs and is used by many residents in the
city. But the addition of apartment complexes would seriously
over-crowd the park..
, , . Page 4
- •Renton Hill concerns
14. Public Works - We have concern that our sewer and drainage
systems could not withstand the strain of providing for the
needs of a large increase in population.
The points we have listed are only guidelines to help you
understand how we feel about Renton Hill and the many concerns
we have weighed to formulate our position. We hope this will
be of help to you in making your decision about the future of
Renton Hill.
r
7R ,
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
OCTOBER 12 , 1977
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Clark. Teegarden , Chairman
Comprehensive Planning Committee
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL AREA
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING
INTRODUCTION:
By action of the Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting
on the. above subject matter, the Comprehensive Planning Committee
was requested to study the area in question and report back to the
Commission on October 12 , 1977. The attached public hearing notice
(public hearing, September 14 ,-1977) describes the area to be con-
sidered and is generally defined as the Renton Hill Comprehensive
Planning Area . (Refer to Public Hearing Notice. )
For the purposes of the Committee ' s deliberations , the Comprehensive
Plan is defined as the offical statement of the City of Renton
establishing major policies concerning desirable future development.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - DEFINITION AND PURPOSE :
The Comprehensive Plan consists of the Goals , Objectives , and Poli-
cies ; Land Use Element; Circulation Element; Community Facilities
Element; and Definitions . Proposed developments should be reviewed
against the Comprehensive Plan to insure that growth is consistent
with the Plan.
The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are :
s To improve the physical and social environment of the
city as a setting for human. activities - to make it more
functional , beautiful , decent , healthful , interesting,'
and efficient;
Y y
JtLIC NTIvJE
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING COMMISSION
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON
SEPTEIIBER 14, 19770 AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
DESCRIBED BELOW:
i v
PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA
IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE
EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT—OF—WAY ON THE SOUTH.
ref. I
i 71...NIL. .11 tly.1 . - , 111)5: , . Flitil.. +.
.g i 1, , .. ,,,„ . 1 .4 1,s 1 l':: :...
Ii tri jj ....,-3.. ,, [I , in ' pdi... 4...,], - ‘
ii •".-lk - d r it, ; _ i, --..,,,_4
ire{it; II ,4g. . i jgcl: '1,, :t1 '. -fi,:i"i,:s ''',.,ji - s''
.iii .„ r. • !, 1 II _. , ::, i :17,4: : --I
t 1 1 L I 1 J <
jj
1 I L
y.. j -.HI
' .. , ...M"1iIs
w
v �`
---- L" " ' "_J __ ---' s .,..--1, '---";„i 1 t'I-:'`-, ---------- 1 - 1'1:';:::-;;;;4,11:4--- 1
. :,j:11fi . . it'' ® __
ii\ Vs
4 1
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT
COMMENTS IN WRITING.
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT:
CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. i
RENTON, WA. 98055
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Two
m - To promote the public interest, the interest of the city
at large as well as the interests of individuals , or
special groups ;
• To facilitate the democratic determination and implementa-
tion of city policies on development;
• To effect political and technical coordination in
development;
• To inject long-range considerations into the determination
of short-range actions ; and
• To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on
the making of political decisions on the development of the
city.
The Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as a guide to help resolve
some of the development problems confronting municipal officials and
the people they represent. The Plan takes into account existing con-
ditions and future needs , and attempts to express the best reasonable
consensus that can be achieved at a given time as to the character
and direction of future growth.
The. Plan is of necessity general in its proposals . It must be flexible ,
since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect
the community . The Plan is not a zoning ordinance, although it makes
significant recommendations for future land use. The Plan is not pre-
cise. It does not represent engineering accuracy, nor does it claim
to predict exactly the future use of every parcel of property, or
insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
it F.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
' October 12 , 1977
Page Three
In order for the Plan to maintain effectiveness , it should be reviewed
periodically. Conditions might change and unforeseen events may occur
which might necessitate a re-evaluation.
BACKGROUND:
As background to the study of the area in question , the Committee con-
ducted a field trip of the area involved and studied in detail the
existing land use , the characteristics of the existing development , and
the physical features of the land, including topography and drainage.
During the course of the work sessions by the committee , representatives
from property owners in the Hill area were present and provided input
in the matters discussed. The matter of access was considered in some
detail in terms of the existing street rights-of-way, traffic circulation ,
existing street conditions , the parking and access problems to individual
properties , as well as the matter of general traffic circulation .
The study area for comprehensive planning purposes overlapped into
adjacent areas ; and, therefore , the study of the committee encompasses
areas beyond the immediate boundaries of the Renton Hill area , particu-
larly as it relates to traffic circulation , potential development,
need for community facilities , and general area-wide impact of future
development.
The consideration of the committee was basically restricted to con-
sideration of the Comprehensive Plan elements : land use , circulation ,
and community facilities . in regard to said elements , the natural
characteristics of the area were also considered. •
Co-riprehensive Planning Committee Report
. October 12 , 1977
Page Four
LAND USE ELEMENT:
FINDINGS :
1 . The Renton Hill area is primarily a single family residential
neighborhood with some limited apartment and duplex use inter-
mixed. The extent of multi -family residential development is
limited at this time and is primarily concentrated along Mill
Avenue South and located westerly of Cedar.
2. Physical characteristics of the area indicate that, while an older
area of the community, the area is basically sound in terms of
both building and general physical potential for upgrading . This
potential is presently being recognized by many property owners
in the area , and the area is considered a desirable single family
residential neighborhood.
3. While the area has been in a state of transition , with increased
land values , the physical amenities o.f the Hill area , such as view,
makes the area highly desirable for residential development.
4 . The existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for Renton
Hill is primarily single family residential with low and medium
density multi -family residential designations between Mill Avenue
South and Cedar Avenue South and extending southerly to and includ-
ing a larger tract of medium density multi -family residential
located at the southwesterly edge of the Hill area . The hillside
areas to the north are presently designated as greenbelt, with
the existing industrial development adjacent to the railroad
right-of-way and a low density multi -family designation to the ' '
•
Comprehe.ns.tve Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Five
north adjacent to the Cedar River.
5 . The area includes several large tracts of undeveloped areas ,
which represent both potential single family and multi -family
residential development. Development in accordance with the
present plan would result in increased land use densities .
6. The Committee also reviewed the geological conditions of the
Hill area , including consideration regarding mines previously
located in the area. It was initially recognized that the Hill
has large underlying coal beds , some of these beds having been
mined-out. . Said coal beds represent not only a future energy
resource potential but also a hazard to any surface development
in terms of possible mine 'subs'idance. The extent of such
development hazard is unknown and will vary with location . It
is recognized ,, however, such hazards must be considered in
terms of existing and future development. '
CIRCULATION: .
f1 . The Committee initially recognizes that the present circulation
to Renton Hill is restricted to one access point (at Third and
Mill ) , which essentially creates a large cul -de-sac-type situation .
2 . The present 40 foot street rights-of-way restrict access and
limit parking , particularly in that area north of South 7th
Street. The existing topography precludes any substantial
improvement of existing rights-of-way to allow improved access
and parking.
.Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Six
3. The parking for the residential uses is primarily on-street
rather than off-street; and it is recognized that topography
limitations preclude, in many cases , development of acceptable
off-street parking spaces .
4. , Increased traffic has occurred as the result of the extensive
use of Phillip Arnold Park located at the top of the Hill .
This impact is particularly noticeable on Renton Avenue. On-street
parking has also impacted the adjacent residential neighborhood.
5 . The existing Arterial Street Plan indicates the extension of
Mill Avenue extending in a southeast direction , connecting to a
secondary arterial serving the Tiffany Park area . The present
Plan also projects the extension of Grant Avenue South from South
11th to Puget Drive.
6 . The extension of Mill Avenue South with the connection as proposed
does not appear to be physically feasible due to the existing devel -
opment that has occurred and the steep topography.
7. New development of any type would, in the opinion of the committee ,
further impact the existing circulation system unless alternative
means of access were provided to serve the area. The Committee
further recognizes , however, that providing additional access
could further compound the existing problem and make the situation
more critical .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
Q
1 . The existing park has been utilized as a facility serving beyond
the immediate neighborhood. The basic result has been an increase
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report .
October 12, 1977
Page Seven
in traffic circulation problems beyond those created by the
immediate residents of the Hill area.
2 . The existing park facility, however, is fully developed and is
used intensively by the community at large. The Renton School District
presently has a. 10 acre elementary school site located easterly
of said park. A school development at this site is not contem-
plated at this time or in the near future, due to the limited
elementary population that might potentially attend said school .
NATURAL SYSTEMS :
1 . The Hill area , due to its nature , has large undeveloped hillside
areas with steep slopes , providing a natural greenbelt drainage
system.
2. Disturbance through new development represents a potential hazard
in terms of slides and increased runoff problems ..
RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based on its analysis , the Committee recommends as follows :
LAND USE : .
1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill area,
the Committee recommends that the Hill area north of the Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission right-of-way be
designated as single family residential .
2. The steep hillside areas , powerline rights-of-way, and natural
drainage courses be established as greenbelt areas , in addition
to those presently designated on the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan .
r � _
`Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Eight
CIRCULATION :
1 . The land use designations as reflected in the existing Compre-
hensive Plan was based upon provision of additional access to the
Renton Hill area to the south and southeast. The extension of
Mill. Avenue South is not physically feasible ; and , therefore ,
it is recommended by the Committee that such designation on the
Arterial Street Plan be deleted.
2 . Extensive input on the part of the residents in the Hill area
indicates the desire to continue the limited access to the Hill
(Third and 'Mill ) as it is presently constituted. The purpose of
such limitation is to enhance the amenities of the Hill area as
a residential community and preclude through access . It is ,
therefore , further recommended that the proposed Grant Avenue
connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of
access to the Hill .
3. It is recognized that improved access will be necessary to serve
the properties to the south and southeast of the Renton Hill area
at such time as they are developed. The intent of the Committee ' s
recommendations is that such access be provided from the south .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . Retain the present community facilities designations for the Renton
Hill area , including the park and school site , recognizing that the
use of the school site for an elementary school may or may not be
feasible in the near future.
v L
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Nine
2. The Committee further recommends that the City pursue the possibil -
ity of expansion of Phillip Arnold Park to the southeast , since it
appears that the potential area would allow reasonable expansion
of said facility.
3. The area designated low density multi-family residential adjacent
to the Cedar River north of the railroad be redesignated future
recreation .
RENTON URBAN AREA 11, ' 6
1114 I I I
.w,=COMPREHENSIVE PLAN � I
I \ w � � L _ I
REVISED AUGUST 1978 li ��t -
\ I[[JJ�,
•
SCALE IN FEET :'"
LEGEND `� -�
I= SINGLE FAMILY I•::: .• LIGHT INDUSTRY OR M-P �
C1 LOW DENSITY MUTT. FAM. MI HEAVY '. :•=■ p 1
O MED. 1811 MANUFACTURING PARK R■_ 1 .
O HIGH " On RECREATION
I COMMERCIAL I GREENBELT ,.- rs II
- PUBLIC 8 OUASI-PUBLIC Alll� ,. .
�111f€ to ft I
�� LAKE ■ >� °' tim
�� \ A HINGTON � 4 Kra
'� ° " '`§ e'er
'}P iti ti ILAI� OE _mai
\ AV* Alpair 171- 1 i.
lann9)41111!_iiiiii \ I )V41%.‘111110 ""6211111 i
L teK-Aggli " 1,ill \ ing,§ tyi-.16) -- v,,,i1
mil it r. ..
1 I all'i6 li ilr I .1111310/.100. .... ... , 41--Fill
ti
Mt
u � � E'fl,� ti ICI 1■F ._.4
.11:\ ...... .... '�1-' rat.mmo � .II
n�� ►� - i1 1
mi
III V 1 :.:.:.:.: ,.....,,:c-cr- ,
1111L
: 41 ..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'1/'-'-' 1'
.
-55.4y: ......... ..01.,ffis ,ft, ' „#°' --- '''''''
....
AiJ astst,„, --ti&-::::::::.;.:,........,:7 m a - - , _.4„...
1 .....:.:.:1.:.:.......:.:.:.4 1.„ tiiii:k,N, 1 1: -}
4aii
iip..4\,..____,I'dtlii.it ti:•:•:•:•:•:•::::•:•::: li m ..a
'Irdit
r-- 1t� ii ' 111 ' :::'""":::::::. mi
isv. mg
-.
4iii�.1.. 1*Egg ' 401 aa ':.:.:.:.:.; .::„„:„.„„„„::,:........,...... .:......... . --Nampa—rS.........111.... . i il,
Q$ 6.*464. .7-
'x y:vhtiri:�r :,, thirsito Y .,
if
, 11*:::0:•:•:•:•:•:-:•:47::iffr A 4t r..' 0 1 __ _ _Ci y
r
(, • 1 I I I I � I LAKEGS YOUN
\ 1 P-,//
I
_i ,i
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan is an official public document
adopted by the City Council as a policy guide to decisions regarding the physical
development of the community. It indicates in a general way what the people of
the community consider as desirable future land use development. The areas
denoted on the map above are generalized. The definitions listed on the back
will aid in interpreting the map. This is not a Zoning map and therefore, does
not represent existing zoning within the city. Zoning of individual parcels of
land is outlined on the Zoning map and specific uses permitted are defined in the
Zoning Code. For further information call the Planning Department at 235-2550,
Municipal Building, Renton, WA 98055.
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
An area intended to be occupied LL, a single family dwelling unit or related compatible
uses.
LOW DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
An area intended for two-family dwellings and limited special uses.
MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
An area intended for Medium Density/Medium Rise residential uses such as apartments
and townhouses.
HIGH DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY
An area intended for residential uses allowing the maximum number of dwelling units,
the maximum number of stories, and the maximum proportion of land area coverage
permitted in the city.
COMMERCIAL
An area intended as a retail area with some non-industrial wholesale and service
activities, office buildings, and uses devoted to the traveling public, such as
hotels and motels.
MANUFACTURING PARK
An area designated as having light and certain compatible heavy industrial uses with
selected commercial uses in a manufacturing park type development which includes, but
is not limited to, adequate setbacks, landscaping, functional design, compatibility
with adjacent uses, open space, wildlife habitat, and perhaps joint use of facilities.
LIGHT INDUSTRY OR MANUFACTURING PARK
An area designated as having industrial activities and uses involving the processing,
handling and creating of products, also research and technological processes which
are devoid of nuisance factors, hazard, or excessive demands upon public facilities
and services.
HEAVY INDUSTRY
An area designated as having industrial activities and uses involving manufacturing,
assembling and processing, bulk handling of products, large amounts of storage, ware-
housing, heavy trucking and all other uses, excluding single family and duplex residen-
tial dwellings.
PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC
Those areas in which publicly and certain privately owned uses are located, which
include utilities, health care, churches, clubs, or philanthropic institutions
primarily designed to promote the public welfare or serve the public on a non-profit
basis.
RECREATION
Those areas designated primarily for leisure time pursuits by members of the public,
for active and passive recreation which includes such land uses as parks and play-
grounds.
GREEN BELT (LIMITED DEVELOPMENT AREA)
An area with severe topographic, ground water, slide potential or other physical
conditions which impair development, and is intended to be developed in extremely
low density single family, recreation, open space, or other compatible low density
use.
7
OPENING STATEMENT before Renton City Council, November 21 , . 1977
My name is Kathy Keolker; my address is 532 Cedar Avenue South.
I am responsible for the petition asking for a rezone of Cedar
Avenue South that was submitted to , you in June 1977. A second
petition was circulated on the remainder of Renton Hill in support
of the original petition. It also opposes zoning, planning or
building of multiple family dwellings or industrial concerns on
Renton Hill or in any adjacent area that might require access
through our neighborhood. The two petitions have over 250 sig-
natures to date and they represent a majority of Renton Hill
property owners. Many of these people have lived on Renton Hill
for more than 50 years.
Since these petitions were circulated, we have formed a.
community group called the Renton Hill Community Association.
We support and encourage growth that is in the best interests
of the residents of. the Hill. We are before you this evening
in support of the Planning Commission' s recommendations for
changes in the comprehensive land use plan for our area. You
are our elected representatives and we ask, you for your help in
solving the problems of Renton Hill.
This evening we will affirm our position as opposing
apartment development on Renton Hill. We will share the specific
concerns which prompted us to take action in order to give you
as much information as possible to make a decision on the
recommendations that are before you. Simply the fact that we
have united our families, friends and neighbors in the effort
to save Renton Hill is a credit to the City of Renton. We value
Page 2
Ope.njng Statement, 11/21/77
all the good qualities of life in this city and we feel these
qualities are represented in our neighborhood. This effort has
not been made by one person but by the many members of the
community as a whple. Our position is to encourage orderly,
appropriate growth for Renton Hill that is practical, responsible
and healthy.
The people who will share our concerns tonight are members
of the Renton Hill Community Association and were chosen by their
neighbors to represent them and speak for their interests. Each
person will give a short presentation of specific concerns. In
this way, we will share a maximum amount of information in a
minimum of time.
We have spent several weeks in meetings with members of the
Planning Commission to study Renton Hill in depth. I am very
impressed with their dedication and professionalism and I am
amazed with the amount of time and study that has gone into their
final recommendation. We support their recommendations in total
and we are pleased to' know that such a conscientious advisory
group is involved in the city planning process.
We will show you tonight that the addition of multi-family
housing on Renton Hill would have a severe detrimental impact
on an existing long-established community. It would destroy
the unique character of our neighborhood. At the present time,
we have reached and, in some cases, exceeded the amount of
traffic volume these old streets can handle. With the addition
of apartment complexes the traffic volume, access, street width
. Page 3
Opening Statement, 11/21/77
and parking would be intolerable. This is our most pressing
concern. We are also concerned with maintaining our low crime
rate, insuring the safety of our children, appreciating the
4
historical value of the Hill and encouraging the pride of
ownership which is so important in older neighborhoods.
Renton Hill has the potential to become the showplace of the city.
By revitalizing and improving an older single family community
that exemplifies the best qualities of life in the City of
Renton, we all benefit from responsible growth and we add to the
value of Renton as a desirable and pleasant place to live.
We are concerned, we are proud of our neighborhood and we
care. If we didn' t care, no petitions would have been circulated,
no signatures willingly given, no community association formed
and no one would be here this evening. We value our homes and
the quality of life on Renton Hill and we feel these qualities
are priceless. Without love, family and a sense of belonging
for each individual, our society will not survive. When we
stop to realize that each person' s life touches another, we
must try to insure that in our relationships with other people
we are warm, compassionate and caring. This is the feeling of
being a member of the family of Renton Hill and this is what
we are trying to save.
Ir
O RL
4 . 'V
„ ó 9, THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055
O °^' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
/04 235 - 2550
094lFO SEPScte'
MEMORANDUM
October 25 , 1977
TO: Planning Commissioners
FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN , RENTON HILL AREA
Attached for your information are a memo and Council _ .
minutes of June 6 , 1977, and October 17 , 1977 , to
clarify the intent of the Council referral . .
In view of this , the Planning Commission public hear-
ing scheduled for November 9 will be on the Comprehen-
sive Plan only, as it relates to the expanded area of
the Hill (powerline right-of-way to Puget Drive to
Edmonds Avenue S. E . /116th Avenue S . E. extended) .
GYE :wr
Attachments
cc: Mayor
Council President
pF R /1,
THE CITY OF RENTON
7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
41, CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD
OVA (o•
CITY CLERK
0,Q9TeO SEP-it
MEMORANDUM
TO: Renton Planning Commission
FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk
•
RE: Comprehensive Land Use Planning - Renton Hill
The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting of October 17,
1977, has directed that the Planning Commission be advised of
Council action as follows: MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH,
PLANNING COMMISSION BE NOTIFIED THAT INTENT OF MOTION ON 6/6/77
WAS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THIS TIME TO CONSIDER ONLY
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED. City Attorney Shellan noted
per ordinance, that the jurisdiction for rezoning is with the
Land Use Hearing Examiner and the primary function with the
Planning Commission is change in Comprehensive Plan and also
recommendations on zoning changes areawide.
•
•
•
• /; -\'7
RCP1ED o)
OCT \I(6.
25 1977
1
9 �
'\'G D?
•
s
Renton City Council
10/17/77 Page 4
Correspondence and Current Business - Continued
Garbage Letter from Deputy Finance Director Bennett recommended referral to
Continued the Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. Councilman Stredicke
inquired re change in King County scale system, being advised by
Bennett that scales go into effect about 11/1/77 with probable
change in rates at that time. Public Works Director Gonnason antici-
pated letter next Monday indicating rate increase. Councilman Perry
noted being advised in committee meeting of $50,000 surplus in the
garbage fund and asked Administration for clarification by next week.
Mayor Delaurenti asked Deputy Finance Director to handle request.
MOTION CARRIED.
Advance Refunding Letter from Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation requested meet-
Water & Sewer ing to discuss advance refunding of 9/1/54, 5/1/65 and 12/15/65
Revenue Bonds water and sewer revenue bonds, having previously met with Finance
Director and Deputy. The letter explained purpose that new refund-
ing bonds issued on a parity of lien with the 1976 refunding bonds
and eliminate the 1 .5 coverage requirement; new coverage require-
ment would be 1 .3 on all the water and sewer debt or annual reduction
in debt service of approximately $65,000. The letter noted second
benefit of refunding program with reduction of in debt service of
approximately $43,700. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER
MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION.
Councilman Stredicke noted reduction in funds of $100,000 for
application to Senior Citizen Center, being advised by Deputy Finance
Director Bennett that savings on water and sewer bond issues are
Utility Fund and not General Fund savings; Stredicke inquiring re
transfer/appropriation. MOTION CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS Council President read 6/6/77 Council minutes regarding petition
from Renton Hill citizens to review zoning in area and action taken
Comprehensive with substitute motion by Shinpoch that Council refer request for
Plan - single family zoning to the Planning Commission and Hearing Examiner,
Renton Hill which motion carried. Perry reported discussion re intent of divi-
sion of responsibilities and tasks and PERRY MOVED, SECOND SHINPOCH,
/'_ PLANNING COMMISSION BE NOTIFIED THAT INTENT OF MOTION ON 6/6/77
WAS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THIS TIME TO CONSIDER ONLY THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CARRIED. City Attorney Shellan noted per
ordinance, that the jurisdiction for rezoning is with the Land Use
Hearing Examiner and the primary function with Planning Commission
is change in Comprehensive Plan and also recommendations on zoning
changes areawide. (See earlier setting of public hearing)
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted com-
Development mittee report recommending Council support the request of the King
Committee Report County Council to introduce proposed King County Motion 77-237 to the
Joint Sphere of State Legislature, being enabling legislation to allow cities and
Influence counties to establish joint sphere of influence. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Off-Site The committee report recommended changes to the ordinance following
Improvements review of procedures for granting deferrals, exceptions , variances
and waivers by City Board and Land Use Hearing Examiner, as follows :
(a) Ordinance creating the Bd. of Public Works Code 6-2-606 member-
ship - restructure membership to include Director of Public Works,
Director of Parks and Recreation, Director of Planning, Fire Chief
and Traffic Engineer (deleting Airport Director and Finance Director.
(b) Duties 6-2-602E, revise changing work "variances" to "deferments"
adding after thereto "deferments shall not exceed 24 months. " (c)
Add new section allowing granting of deferred off site improvements
by Board of Public Works, adding statement that such deferments
may be granted for reasonable cost not to exceed a period of two
years. The report noted committee will continue to review and study
Council policy regarding this subject. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND
PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Councilman Perry noted policy change that deferments shall not exceed
24 months and deferment shall not be granted unnecessarily; previous
-- policy left open-ended deferments , such as at time of LID in area.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, REFER ORDINANCE CHANGES TO THE WAYS
AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
R -nton ,City Counci 1
/ '
10/24/77 Page 2
CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all
Council members are considered routine and are enacted by one motion
unless removed by Council action for separate consideration.
Voucher Approval Ways and Means Committee recommended Council approval for payment
of Vouchers #15567 through #15744 in amount of $406,913.88, and
LID #302 Revenue and Cash Warrants R-6 $87, 062. 36, C-7 $10,000 & C-8
$77,062.36. with departmental certification as to receipt of services
and/or merchandise. Council approval .
Proclamation Mayor Delaurenti 's Proclamation declared 11/7 - 14/77 as Hire a
"Hire Disabled Disabled Veteran Week urging employers to be instrumental in this
Veterans" undertaking by realizing contributions and sacrifices of veterans.
Bid Opening City Clerk Mead reported 10/21/77 bid opening for signalization and
S. 2nd St. road widening for South 2nd St. from Mill Ave. S. to Main Ave. S.
Improvements Two bids received as shown on attached tabulation. Refer to the
Public Services Committee.
SCS and Stirskey Hearing Examiner Beeler transmitted records and recommendation for
Holdings approval with conditions Rezone SR-1 to R-2, SCS and Stirskey
Rezone Holdings, property located approximately 100 ft. west of Rolling
R-077-77 Hills Ave. SE along the east side of Puget Dr. SE between Parkwood
single family residence subdivision and the BPA Carr line right-of-
way. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance.
Rubin Salant Hearing Examiner Beeler transmitted records and recommendation for
Rezone approval with conditions RezoneGS-1 to R-2 and R-3 mith conditions
R-071-77 for property located at the northeast corner of South Puget Drive
and Grant Ave. S. ; property extended approximately 550 ft. north
of South Puget Dr. along Grant Ave. S. Applicant: Rubin Salant.
Purpose: Construction 150-160 units on 7.8 acre site.
Refer to Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance.
Consent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN CONSENT AGENDA.
Approval CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS '
Appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Mr. Lawrence J. Warren as
Acting City the Acting City Attorney for the City effective November 1 , 1977,
Attorney noting state law and City Code applicable, as well as necessity
of appointment due to Gerard M. Shellan's resignation effective
as of 10/31/77 to assume new position as King County Superior Court
Judge. The letter explained an Asst. City Attorney will be
appointed by the Acting City Attorney, notice to be filed pursuant
to City Code. Consideration of permanent appointment of City
Attorney will be made in due time with consultation with Council
at that time. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Mayor Delaurenti introduced Acting City
Attorney Larry Warren.
Renton Hill Letter from Robert McBeth of Gouge, McBeth & Faull , submitted copy
Rezone Request of legal memorandum prepared in response to questions by members
of the Planning Commission; submitted to Council for review in
evaluating-requests being made to change the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan and applicable Zoning Ordinances on Renton Hill . MOVED BY
STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER CORRESPONDENCE TO THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE UNTIL TIME OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS MATTER
`ll/-2-1177.). CARRIED.- S --
Latecomer Request. Letter from King County Department of Public Works , D. R. Horey,
King County County Road Engineer requested Latecomer' s agreement on 12-inch
Shop Facility . sanitary sewer trunk serving the County consolidated office and shop
facility and also the 12-12 inch extension connecting into the
City system in SE 141st St. The letter noted intent by County to
recover portion of the sanitary sewer installations costs when
shared with adjacent property owners; 15 year agreement requested.
Total cost of both trunks quoted by general contractor to County
is $152,697-. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST
TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
1
• = ti
Y � .
•
p f
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
October 24, 1977 Municipal Building
Monday, 8: 00 P . M . Council Chambers
M IN U T E S
CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the
regular meeting of the Renton City Council. to order. •
ROLL CAL OF GEORGE J. PERRY, Council President; RICHARD M. STREDICKE, BARBARA
COUNCIL Y. SHINPOCH, KENNETH D. BRUCE, EARL CLYMER AND PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR- •
THORPE, who noted absence last week due to duties of supervising
6th Graders at Camp Waskowitz.
STAFF IN CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; G. M. SHELLAN, City Attorney; GWEN
ATTENDANCE MARSHALL, Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN,
Planning Director; WARREN GONNASON, 'Public Works Director; RICHARD
GEISSLER, Fire Chief; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief; DONALD CUSTER,
Administrative Assistant.
PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle.
SPECIAL AWARD Mayor De.laurenti presented Gerard M. Shellan with plaque for out-
City Attorney standing service to the City as City Attorney for 27 years, express-
G. M. Shellan ing appreciation, noting Mr. G. Shellan's recent victory for the
"Leaving Vicinity City in the Health Department case. Mr.Shellan recalled his years as
But Not in unforgettable and challenging, expressing appreciation for all
Spirit" the past considerations and help in resolving the mutual problems.
COUNCIL MINUTE Minutes of 10/17/77. Correction Page 5, second paragraph re Histori-
APPROVAL 10/17 cal Railroad Car, third line to read: Referred to Administration
for consideration in its preparation of a proposal for development
Historical RR Car of Burnett Ave. S. between S. 4th and S. 7th St. MOVED BY THORPE,
SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL APPROVE CORRECTION TO 10/17 MINUTES. CARRIED.
Addition: Page 5, Ways and Means Committee Report. The Ways and
Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report recommend-
Senior Center ing that City' s Bonding Council prepare an ordinance for the Senior
Bond Issue Citizens' Center in the amount of $900,000 and the length of bond
issue be twenty years and the principal payment be deferred until
1980 with only interest payments in .1978 and 1979. MOVED'BY CLYMER,
SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL AMEND MINUTES
TO INCLUDE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND
THORPE, COUNCIL ACCEPT MINUTES OF 10/17/77 AS CORRECTED. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notice having been published
Federal Shared and posted, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to consider
Revenue Funds the City' s Planned Use of the General Revenue Sharing Money as
1978 presented by the Mayor for inclusion in the 1978 budget. Report
(H.R. 13367) was presented explaining the Mayor' s recommended use of the Federal
Revenue Funds for the year 1978 totalling $641 ,72.4 with expenditures
for Puget Sound Conference of Governments; CATV Cable Television
services with City of Seattle; Public Safety, Police, Patrol and Fire
Suppression Salaries; Seattle-King County Public Health Services;
Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency; Parks and Recreational
salaries; Library salaries. Upon inquiry Finance Director Marshall
explained guidelines for use of the funds, noting the City has chosen
to use the revenue sharing money in similar manner' in most years,
that use of funds for salaries is easiest for auditing purposes.
Upon further inquiry, Finance Director Marshall explained formula
for determining the amount of funds , being determined by unemploy-
ment rate and City's tax effort; that City' s increase in utility tax
was taken into consideration in arriving at $641 ,724 figure.
Upon further inquiry, Mayor Delaurenti explained legal requirements
for hearing and opportunity for public participation; that Council
will make final determination on use of the funds at time of budget
hearing and adoption. MOVED BY PERRY , SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CLOSE
THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. The Mayor had invited audience comment,
none forthcoming.
1-t-3 e .4-
I
,_,
/ 0 -.1 q- 77
• GOUGE, MCBETH & FAULL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
H. DONALD GOUGE P.O. BOX 26 ,'/ir
ROBERT E.McBETH 505-B SOUTH THIRD STREET jY CC ,,
GARY F. FAULL RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 ,1` Jl V ® ,`
,
ALPINE 5-5600
October 13, 1977 C/TY ocT 1819,,
MAYORS QeNT
Fief
The Honorable Charles J. Delaurenti, Mayor �, ��'� 20?j?2��
Members of' the Renton City Council '�. P
Renton Municipal Building c� 19�� �`
200 Mill Avenue South 0 �&® Iv
Renton, Washington 98055 ® \� r .
r
RE: RENTON HILL - REZONE REQUEST e ��o 0g S®�-
Dear Mayor Delaurenti and e 9 �
Members of the Renton City Council:
Enclosed herein please find a copy of a Legal Memorandum
which I had prepared in response to questions directed
to me by members of the Planning Commission. I forward
this Memorandum to you for your review and consideration
in evaluating the requests now being made to change the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan and applicable Zoning Ordinances
on Renton Hill.
If you have any questions, please feel ee to call me.
Very tr you , vi4.____
/k
ROBERT E. McBETH
REMcB:mr '
cc-Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney
l"
4 ,
4
TO: City of Renton - City Council
City of Renton - Planning Commission
City of Renton - Planning Department
Gerard M Shellan, City Attorney
FROM: Renton Hill Community Association
Robert E. McBeth, Attorney at Law
LEGAL MEMORANDUM
ISSUE: May the City of Renton change the existing Comprehensive
Plan and/or Zoning Ordinances to remove "apartment houses" as
permitted uses allowed on Renton Hill?
ANSWER: Yes
I . ADOPTION OF ZONING REGULATIONS STANDARDS
The Renton City Council has the discretionary power to
enact such zoning regulations as it deems appropriate to govern
or regulate the 'growth and development of this city. As a
general proposition, .: the enactment of a zoning ordinance by a
city council is a discretionary exercise of police power by the
legislative authority of a city: and will not be reviewed by the
Courts - except for a manifest abuse of such discretion. The
burden .of .proving abuse of discretion, usually characterized as
arbitrary and .capr•icious conduct, is upon the persons challenging
it. Sharninghbusev. City of Bellingham, " 4 Wn. App 198, 480 P. 2d.
233 (1971) . A concise statement of the law concerning a challenge
to a zoning action taken by a municipality was given in State ex .
rel Myhre v. City of Spokane , 70 Wn. 2d: 207 , 210 , 422 P.2d 750
(1967) as follows :
" [1] Zoning is a discretionary exercise of police power
by a legislative authority. Lillions v. Gibbs , 47 Wn. 2d 269 ,
289 P. 2d 203 (1955) . Courts will not review, except for
manifest abuse , the exercise of legislative discretion.
State ex rel. Smilanich v. McCollum, 62 Wn. 2d 602 , 384 P. 2d
358 (1963) . Manifest abuse of discretion involves arbitrary:
and capricious conduct. Such conduct is defined to be
without consideration and in disregard of the facts . State
-1-
•
ti
ex rel. Lopez-Pacheco v. Jones, 66 Wn. 2d 199 , 401 P. 2d 841
(1965) ; State ex rel. Cosmopoli's Con'so1'. School Dist. No. 99.
v. Bruno, 61 Wn. 2d 461 , 378 P. 2d 691 (1963) . One who asserts
that a public authority has abused its discretion and is
guilty of arbitrary, capricious , and unreasoning conduct has
the burden of proof. State ex rel. Lopez-Pacheco v. Jones ,
supra; State .ex rel. Longview Fire 'Fighters' Union, Local
828 , v. Long-view, . 65 Wn. 2d 568, 399 P.2d 1 (1965) . If the
validity of the legislative authority' s classification for
zoning purposes is fairly debatable, it will be sustained.
Euclid v. Ambler Realty 'Co. , 272 U.S. 365 , 71 L.Ed. 303 , 47
Sup. Ct. 114 , 54 A.L.R. 1016 (1926) . "
See also Farrell v. City of Seattle, 75 Wn.2d 540 , 452 P. 2d 965
(1969) . These general rules have been followed consistently in
this state in numerous decisions rendered by our Courts. The
arbitrary and capricious standard was discussed in Sharninghouse
v. City of Bellingham,,, supra, at 201 , and in .L'illions v. Gibbs ,
47 Wn.2d 629 , 289 ' P. 2d 203 (1955) , and the standard was defined
as ' follows :
"Arbitrary and ',capricious action of administrative
bodies means willful and unreasoning- action, without
consideration and in disregard of facts or circumstances .
Where there is room for two opinions , action is not arbi-
trary or.- capricious when exercised honestly and upon due
consideration, even though it may be believed that an
erroneous conclusion has been reached, In re Buffelen 'Lbr.
&' Mfg. Co. , 32 Wn. (2d) 205 , 208 , 201 P. (2d) 194 (1948) ,
and case cited. .
Accord, State ex rel. Myhre v. Spokane, supra; Burnham v.
Board of Appeals .of' Gloucester, 333 Mass . 114 , 128 N.E.2d
722 (1955) . " '
See also : Washington Association 'for Retarded 'Citizens' v. City. 'of
Spokane, 16 Wn. App.• 103.; (1976) . '
II.. "AMENDMENT OF ZONING REGULATIONS STANDARDS
When, a City Council acts to amend or -change conditions
existing under established zoning laws , additional considerations
come into play. Before deciding. to amend its zoning ordinance, a
city must weigh benefits which flowto the public generally
against the detriment, if any, to adjacent or otherwise affected
property owners or to the public which might result from such a
_ )_
•
q.- •
•
change. This concept was discussed by the Court in Fleming v.
City of Tacoma, 81 Wn.2d 292 , 295 , 502 P.2d 327 (1972) as .
follows :
• " [1] We • have long passed the time when one may use
his land as he wishes provided it creates no nuisance. The
concentration of population and the infinite variety of mod-
ern land uses necessitate effective land use planning. The
restrictions on use, inherent in zoning, insure that if one
uses his property in a way harmonious with the existing
zoning codes , he will be free from the danger that the
• future use of his neighbor' s land-might be detrimental to or
• foreclose his own established use. Decisions which amend
or change. conditions under existing zoning laws therefore
require an extremely sensitive balance between individual
rights and the public welfare: The process 'by which such
decisions are made must not only be fair but must appear
- to be fair to insure public confidence therein. "
The Court held that no`only must the City be prepared to meet the •
arbitrary and capricious standard discussed above , it must also
satisfy an "appearness of fairness" standard .which has been dis-
cussed in numerous Court opinions . This is not the place to set
forth a lengthly-.discussion ,of the appearness of fairness standard,
and I would therefore refer the reader to the Court' s opinion in '
the. following 'cases :
l.. . :Fleming V. City of Tacoma,
81•'Wn.2d 292:,- 502 P.2d 327 (1972) .
2. ' West '-Slope Community Council' v. City of Tacoma,
18 Wn. App. 328 (1977) .
•
3. Smith v: Skagit County, •
75 Wn:2d. 715 , 739 , 453 .P. 2d 832 (1969)
4. Buell v. City of Bremerton,
80 Wn. 2d ' 518 , 496 P.2d 1358 (1972) .
Suffice it to say that• under the appearness of fairness doctrine,
• the City Council must act in an open hearing in which all views
. have an opportunity to : be expressed in which the Council acts as
a completely disinterested person to make the final decision on
the matter at issue. The standard is this : ' A zoning action
• meets the requirements of the appearness of fairness doctrine
•
•
• -3-
•
•
•
•
when a• disinterested person, having been appraised of the •
totality. o'f :a, zoning board ,member's, personal interest in a matter .
being: acted upon, would not be reasonably justified' in thinking
that partiality may exist.. ' West Slope Community Council v. City
of Tacoma,, supra. ., • , .
The basic import of all of these cases is that the City
Council St. Planning ,Commission must consider all of the competing •
forces involved in this dispute and reach: an impartial decision
based upon all the •facts and circumstances presented to them.
•
.Once that decision is made, it more than likely will be allowed
to stand. •
III. DUTY TO AMEND ZONING REGULATIONS •
' ON CHANGE IN CONDITIONS :.
•
Although zoning implies a degree of permanency, the City
•
is under a duty., - when conditions relating .to a zoned area have
so clearly changed as to emphatically call for revisions in
. -zoning, to initiate proceedings and consider the necessity of
pertinent modifications of their zoning ordinances. In Bishop
v. Town of Houghton, 69 Wn.2d 786 ,• 792 , 420FP. 2d (1966) , this
concept was• expressed as follows :
" [1] We have no .quarrel with respondents ' basic theme
to the effect, that while zoning implies a degree of perma-
nency, it is not static and zoning authorities cannot blind
themselves to changing conditions. Thus , when conditions
surrounding or ' in relation to , a zoned area have so clearly
changed as to. emphatically call for revisions in zoning, the
appropriate zoning authorities are under a duty to •initiate
proceedings and consider the necessity• of• pertinent modi-
fications of their zoning ordinances. Otherwise, outmoded
zoning regulations can become unreasonable, and the zon-
. ing authorities ' failure to suitably amend or modify their
ordinances can become arbitrary., in which event Courts can
and should grant appropriate relief. 2 Metzenbaum, Zoning
1125 (2d ed. 1955) . " .
This same idea was expressed in • Farrell' v.• City of Seattle , supra,
. as follows :
• " [2] We also recognize that, .although zoning implies a
degree ,of permanency, municipal authorities must be re-
•
-q-
•
sponsive to changing conditions and circumstances which
• - justify ' revision.rof existing zoning: classifications Other
wise.,. •the outdated land use restrictions may become un-
r.easonable, and refusal to amend or modify zoning ordi-
nances !could: result::in' arbitrary and unreasonable conduct.
• • Bishop `v..''Town. of :Ho:ughton, '69 Wn. 2d 786; 420 P. 2d 368
(1966) : Although courts, are not empowered to amend
zoning ordinances,., ,Or rezone a particular property; the may
grant 'appropriate relief :and declare the action of the
zoning authorities invalid; upon a showing of unreasonable
• and.-arbitrary. zoning action�or, .inaction:.. Bishop v. Town • •
of .Houghton;, ,;supra;', 'McNaughton.._:v.' Boeing-, ., 68 Wn:2d 659, .
' .41 4P:2d 778:.°(7 966) :is
4As:,•stated above,, .a zoning ordinance is - not permanent and
is not stafi:c(: °,Zoning authorities--:cannot blind themselves to
changing .conditions' and,:must take positive action to change
zoning regulations when circumstances change.
- IV: VESTING OF PROPERTY RIGHTS •
Two.recent Court of ;Appeals opinions have discussed the
issue of: vested:rights when changes'_are .made' in applicable zoning '
regulations.: :
In Mayer;'Bui'lt H'omes,' Inc= , •V:. . The Town:' of Steilacoom,
17, Wn. App. .558:. (1977) ;.: the Plaintiff's property was affected
by; an ordinance: removing "apartment-houses" as a: permitted use,
in •an existing zoning" classification and by a later change in .
classification- to one-:Which:did not permit apartments. In
separate actions., the .Plaintiff developer challenged the validity •
of the later change and .sought the issuance of .a ,building. permit.
• for -an apartment house.. The developer: argued that the city- acted
• arbitrarily and capriciously . in rezoning his property and that
• the act so reduced its value as to amount to an -unconstitutional
confiscation of his property. The Court's opinion, in full is
attached.to .this': Memorandum for your review. Two statements ,
how,ever, are important:
"We consider first Mayer' s argument that the town
council 's :rezoning of his property must be •voided due to its
arbitrary and capricious nature: s A zoning; act is subject to
•• judicial review only for, manifest- abuse of discretion. The
party assertingthat a legislative authority has abused its
• discretion, by acting- arbitrarily and- capriciously, i.e. ,
'without .consideration'and in -disregard of the facts , has
' . the burden of proof; if the zoning- classification is .
. fairly, debatable, it will 'be sustained. State ex rel. •
. Myhre. v.' Spokane,: 70 Wn. 2d 207, 210 , 422 P. 2d 790 (1967) .
A municipality 's zoning action should be reviewed with
the following approach in mind, as adopted in' Carlsori:v.
Bellevue, 73 Wn. 2d 41, 51, 435 P.2d 957 (1968) :
• . ' In, determining'whether or not a - zoning ordinance'
is reasonable in -its application to agiven parcel of
land, • among the factors to. be taken into. considera-
tion are th'e .character of the neighborhood, existing
• uses- and 'zoning of nearby property, the amount by
. , which property values are decreased, the extent .to .
. which the diminution of values promotes the public-
' . health, safety, morals or welfare, the relative
gain to the public as compared with the hardship
imposed upon the individual owner, the-Suitability
of the subject property for the purpose :for which
' . .it is zoned, and the. length of time the property .
' . has remained unimproved, considered in the context ,
of the land development in' the area. ' No single
. . 'factor is controlling but each must receive due con-
sideration. But. to sustain an attack upon the tali-
, city of , a zoning' ordinance,, an aggrieved property
owner must show that- if the ordinance is enforced
' the consequent restrictions on his property preclude
its use for any purpose to which it is reasonably . ,
adapted. He is required to show that- there is no •
possibility for profitable use under the restrictions
. . , of the 'ordinance, or .alternatively that- the greater .
part of the value of the property' is destroyed. by. '
it, although there may be some slight use remaining.
Adaptability, it has been declared, envisages economic
• as well as - functional use , and assumes not the most
profitable' use, but that some permitted use. can be
' profitable. ' . .
(Footnotes omitted. ) ' 8 E. McQuillin,' Muni'cipal' 'Corpora-
tions . 25 . 45 , . at 111 (3d. ed. rev. 1976) . " ID at 561-562. -
. " j3] The rule on'. retroactivity' of -zoning' changes is
. that application for a building permit vests in the •
applicant the right to use his property as then per-
mitted, and that a subsequent change of zone cannot'
divest him of-that right. State' 'ex 'rel. Ogden v. Bellevue,
45 Wn.2d, 49.'2, 275., P.2d 899 (1954) "ID at 555 - 554.
In Ul'lock v. City of Bremerton., 17 Wn. App. 573 , 583 (1977) ,
•the Court held: . ' . . '
'Furthermore, ,zoning 'laws: do not establish vested
rights-until. 'the -building permit- has been sought and
. �.'ssued-,. and .the: application must be' consistent with .
' :'the:.'zoning. orcinance: Eastlake. Com. Council' v. Roanoke
As's.:'n.,, .82 .Wn. 2d 475 , 513 'P. 2d 36 , 76 A.L.R. 3d 360
7973)'. " Emphasis added. ,
-6- .
•
Under' eac'hof these rulings , it is clear that the
developer ,has. noested right to an existing zoning. ordinance
until an application - for a building permit is filed. Once
•
a building permit. application- is filed, changes in •
zoning 'ordinances cannot affect the property owner. Until that .
time, however, the City can make such changes as it deems
• appropriate and apply. those changes to all property affected .
by the' zoning change. •
V. SUMMARY
The Renton Planning Commission and Renton City Council
have before them a request from residents on Renton Hill to
make such changes in our existing Comprehensive Land-Use Plan
and Zoning 'Ordinances so' ad to remove "apartment houses" as
permitted uses' ori- Renton Hill. ' There is no question that the
City has the power to make. such changes if they feel such
changes are. now appropriate. We contend . that circumstances have
changed since those' ordinances: were adopted and that the City '
now has' an affirmative duty to change both the Comprehensive
Land-use Plan and Zoning Ordinance to meet - this new situation.
The developers 'contention that this' change would result in
economic ruin- or would amount to an unconstitutional taking of
his property is without merit. No. vested rights exist until .an
application for building permit- is filed, and that has not
been done -in this case. The Council and the Planning Commission
must consider .the 'factors set forth in the Mayer-Built Homes •
case, . and we feel 'confident that such review will result in
affirmative action by--the City to make the changes' requested.
<.'.Respectf lly submitted,
•
,', 44: . . . . .
ROERTj. McBETH .
•
• ' Attorney at Law
•
•
CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st
day of November , 19 77 , at 8:00 p.mr in the Council Chambers of
the Renton Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, as the time and place
for a public hearing to consider the following:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, RENTON HILL PLANNING AREA (THAT AREA GENERALLY
BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE
AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON
THE SOUTH)
SEE ATTACHED MAP
Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval,
disapproval or opinions on same.
CITY OF RENTON
De ores A. Mead,Q / 142-46
`�,
City Clerk
DATE OF PUBLICATION
October 21, 1977
CERTIFICATION
I' STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING ) // �j f�
I, 4 e, //V Z -, // Jhereb� ern f�r t at7—/ cy
(Z ) copies of t e above notice were pose by me i ore conspicuous
places on the property described and two copies were posted at tie Fenton
Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South, Renton, WA on date of(jC. . 2)
1.9 7
Sig
ATTEST:
y Pub le in and for the State of
Washington, 'residing in Renton
6/76
.. ':z;', L:7;>ti.•: - - yap'"•, _.
•
•
�-1:'�-:`;�:?iti:r,IS�,'•,�..•- Rom.";,' , : `-e°, I
j:
t"
•
r, • l'• „.; �;ai ii ".
•
.::.:
E,` 7 e,+AF�,v;;•" fV,..,, f,q`' •^ �`>>..+'"Z �r=a'.. _.....1>,• .. f'(.;+t• ar`
r' ' t 4 Y �� f
Rt;
i h
\ � 9 "':y .. rlf,i° .: p_.i,.,
�
Jr.,
t �l 1'.
"C
;s
J 3�
•
. 7) c.'.i, °.., lam+ < (1` I * i9 .J(-F:',..
7'!--- '7},_ +'tr•ice -•
-y
Y , r
'.4v
`f•'T
r.
•
P^ c
r
ter:
Y
_ a 1r na {, >• ",,�_•' ° t}l SDI ' •-•
•
•
yt 5,:
Alt; t Ag{Jr> 'hl++1
•.i�""' :i., "�r; "' • :r,`.:_;''r;• ,`r F a;,+�,�'t.•„[` lrft'a,iI,S;",r`t':{,y,,,.,
t�� ;w;: 5� .s•'• Fi%, ,Y;2,�,•s,pr,A ;,ii:F.a;,• 1. i'
i''' ,cL'g, .i• ar' r e sty4:. •..�,
r, )/
1•, �.;',�:a•if .Sw P.'.
"" t
.,t,n
rs
�.1 •
rf
:•;:�[ ':r':-- • _.f,•....., � ...may,
y� 4 r♦r
-"r� -^.'z< �?}� .'S.w:':I` '4 _ • �bur
�i'' as<'f.;;;"-' 4
n:�l'?u, 5� 1t'b
xr. ta� 'Oita 4•
?. .,r t fa.
t f t,3•, •f�,; v. ��yR �C 't"..pn >'rt � r, •
'G v`�i. YI. ,i
��/ a �43 b "r.�, '"Bi" n k�Y':' � X l
ar.`. 9 �is'..
r. r„,
of Y 5
}� r l
t X •
J`. =r¢,-}:?',sN;N;. ,t1,:"-��''�,t>.•<'pxrl:'.'.K.,. ;".:��';;n, : ,.,
' - .. ..
, • • •
' . ..
P17.--"•1;.-!'''' ''''' •-•-7-7--:1-' ' '";-'.7'..•'''''•(• !-C ., : •7";''- ''''(,....l'i'l;.-T,.. ,,:',''''F";!.';'!''''',; :r.i'(,..f:::!.i.:'.",•-.1.Y..i.!..,:'iii,'-',‘..i'.4K-,-.:::-''..,!!:";' ,...1-••,,''''''!,..'• "''. f',..-1.;,. *,.. •• : . •...•-.,-..', ..:,-• •• .
, .•••.,„,. -:., . ,• :.;,.:,,,,,;...;',? ...-!;.:':•.'•,.5.,\.•;;., 1,.!. ;:,,..::: ;,‘f„-,..::.,,,..i,,,,;,,,,,-,,;,..zi:i.:-.•.•,,,c,.,.:,-;•°;•,...tilt-:,,.;;,..-i•;,.-,,;:':,:,,,,'•):•:,:• .••'....;:."-.... .
:-k.',!.":q''';'''z.-•''''--''. ''' -- --••'.1-r- • ''.... ' ,'' ..,•,•,.:112`•-,2:-.,:-,;-, .-.-;:,.. :N:'„•••.--...-,i- '-,e,.. ,i,, ,t,, .. .,P, ,.,.P.1,- ' '..' ''-',•''• '•-'''";•':'!•!"'I, ., ,..,.,.....,:,!„..:....--..•.,,,,n,,t'f‘g,•nf..,),W,M,,, :il"W-.4'!'/,'.',.',",',"!,',"a,,,.;:i4'!':,',,, ,P;';',;',V/3,•....,';,"?*1-`•"'' ..,..,',,!"'•:•'-.': , ''-. • .. , . •
. . .
FM:0'‘,.•:''.,..`•,.;;",.. , ,- .• ' 'i.,,,- '.'.,'', ..:.,' .''''.--',:.';''-'•.`.4.,:',2,,,r".':':-.";,'"i','If':"..':!,',''!,:?':'''.,:,,,t,',,i,...t.,.1'-,.,',.,,•-.J.:'.."'",•'•'.•.• •- .,'',•-:•.'' .."'.- - '• ''. ,
.. , • , . . .
,. ..
' . .
ri.,'=-:,[i'!..-'.;;-,. ._ .,,.., ,• .
' . .
. .
,',1'.'V...i.,,,, ., • ,,,. \ .,,,,
r:".-,..:,', ,•,...., ,(-,,,,,,,,',-(,. ' ,:-'''''' "/''-i,'; ,r .-'1'; ',.;!',". -.,'`•'' ''''.\'-''..'•/el".4''',;',:,1,,:';',''',:1'.•,:',1".,','.:'.;'''6'''i';-,-;',.<f> . . c,,•-',.;,‘...,. .Q.,.:::;,. ..---, ,_. .,,
:,!Po;,•;:.,,„...r, ,,,,...i. , • .., , • ,') .t.,...._ __,.....,.,:';,-L....:....:_•_..:..2'_,'",/....!.4:n.,•:4:i.,._...:„fi_i!::: ::,;.:.:,,.J.T:fitP„...,_„1"-•,.....Lii.... ...... ' - .c3c.:=_...._._:...,..._.::_________.......:,-;..._!..________.....__......__...._,._.____...
,.,,i,..:,.,-,....-,::,, ,,..,F.r.7-7,---"7---!"--------.•••'--••-:.-7,••- .,..," -",7-.....--',-.;••.- ...,-;'-',-,----..7-:1•,,.,.-',„-'':;.'-r-:41-•'.. .:••',:','--•,-':,gi--,•-i'f:.••.:.'''-',..•'.•,•;.-,',••:-.'''..'''''-,i'";'.--';',. •::,,...;•,•I'.!,-,.. -', •••.• •
.!4•-•.-:' ,;.1,i':':;‘,-",':,,,;--.',.;,f.....': ,;.-•; ...: . •• -.. : • ''-','•••••• -'••.•--, •••.'.:•;.-:-•."-s.',.'‘'''•,-;•;-• -•,,'.'>::..i.:1',•,-..',;•,.t.--.":',•-:',-•;-•..:'':-••••"-•,...;-:f;'.'--.;-•'•:".'• . '. ••-,- : ::.,...,:.,••••'',..,-•.......;,.. . :',. ,
:v•::•...,'..--;:-;•,"..•.• „.,....,.".•,., , - - . • , --. :',--...,-...':...'.., .,.."",-,,,,,:-.,.--.".":1-,'-',.4---1-:,-;1,;.-.,i;'.;,....?,::;-..-•';`,•••:".....,,i--.'', "i-'.,--:<11".",.'..','';:'''".;.... '... -.:. ''Y.','-''•?"";',*-.,- .
. .
,i,,IA.,?!,.!,.1,5•.:',.:,,ir:).44;''•, '. e"!..k.' '''-.; 7. • . '; ./1-..'''; :..--, . •'.. ,..--;..-4.:?..,-,.....,•4:;,,:%,,,,-...;•,-,, f..,....,.4,.....,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. -:-
',:i„,:...,....•.,,,,...,,,,,,,.,•,,,,,,,,,i. .. ..• :.ry.. . ... , , .1,,,,. ...I ,i,.„ ,„.•,,,,,,,c).1.t...,.,..,.4 0,,;„:„,,,,."4: ,:tidt,•:-:.:" '.;:,'•-..• ,.1,......•••..';'.,'.,5,,i,••.-.',.-,- :. ' ',.
' •
••,..--.....,r . ,:- -..- '. - , .
, .
.. .
4:4
'' ,--.'' ' '/..4';•i'? A ,..... ;••:'-•, - '• 4 •.4f:4% I' ...•..i , '
. , • • • .4.
-!.t'! •'4:::•1714 ;!tvr.7•,"•,"'--7.••••'•-" '''• •••-- '''''---"-;•''•7:•••:• -• -' —4 •4'4 4 4. . .7.7'4,7 - -" — " -77'77"- -:-77:!----''-77'7.:7.""-"-7-.""77-7.7.-''''•-,'77---."""' --—"----7.7.7"'"..---""
',',1,Z'y, :"•"••.,:••::::5::-•. • • ''•• ' ''•, .•,'':•%.i''':•'=.•-''''','':'•-,:•.',i;i!'• ,: : :••,,,..):.,,,"...,4•„•:,%.••,,„,•,'" - •
. •-•.-. : ' „- . . ' . . : •., •.-,,, t.:1',, ',;,,,',••••:'.. • , . . '- ';' ::.•:: '.::;:•",-.' :2;'','S• ''','•:,-.;•-'.':1;".•,''': ': :.':-:,.,',1-':•'':'2:'•.,,•`:2..,i:'i,..- ,: • • , .
: •
. ,
,:,-," :::::,..•:,,,,,j.-: :fr) . 4,:•
.''''-.'t.i''''',Vf:A'''i -• ' . „-. . .: .,,.,. ,':.r:' :,•,"•? , ,-,,,,..,,,,,c),..y., .,,,-,..e..,, ....,.....,..-• f •' :::-•• ' ' ' ,. .
' • '
.* -•.•'? . ,,
'.•''•,‘ • :,,rir.:1'.: k• ..r ' i''.. •
•I• -',f II }•^•• ..Z.".'_ .
. '
- .': '',-'',"(' `-''''' %'' . . ,..:...,:::1 • '-. . '' / :-...-,,'-41,''..;,,.;-4'.2",,,,,-,' , '',.' •.'••.. _. :,'"••'6',.,)_ ,,
. .
. . .
,,, . • ,. • ' ,
. , .. .
•
.•
. k.,. . . ..
.,... . ., . .•
. . ,
• . . . .
. , .
. . .
. . . •
. -• . .,- .'... .Y.:'., ....;'.;.:•-,,,,.,..-., :,4-.P.:.:',..,',. ..''.':,'',.24:,',.'-;'.),P,,'....,„,5,...,t,:,,,,..,:. • . •.- :, ,...: .
. ,.. .
,...,' .'•,....,.... . . . . . . ,,., „ , •
,
. .
.',;," .. • •
• . , • .
- . .•, . .
, . .. .,
, . • ,, .• .
- .
,-,..:...:-...-.,:,....'-‘...y. - . ' . .
• .
. . . .
. . .
,...,•.,....,,..-„••...- . •
. . .
. . .
....,....;4..;•''....-... . ,.. .
..., ,..., • . . , . .
•:.•. ....i ,.. - . .
. .
. •
. ,, . ... . ...,...
.., .. . .
. .,
, .
. . ... , .
.. ,
. . ..,
..-..
. . . .
•• .
. . . ., . ,• ,... .'- ;..,-: ....:.,. ...,-••!,..-,-.;!•,,,.,.., •,..f.'..',:-..-',--'3!:,.i..,., .:'.-„i'..'•'":."...''' ....- : -;-'- ' . ,•. .
• •,:',...''.'."1"-:''. • t ''-.•. ' -':' '..,•.. . .../.'1-'',":.'' ..:-..' .•'.:..::*.5; ,.'..,c.:..',''',..,-.'''''',....:''c.', .t ,''.f1,-.','‘.:....',..',...' • • ..: . :::: ' , ' . ..,'. •, . -'
• .
... .
, .
- . . .
. . . .. • •
. .
::,.,..:-.,'.:,.:-•.'...•
. • .i,• ... ......''''.; ,.',.,.•::''..',•••,ir.',....'.,.--,.'.....'. ,...'.T''-...-!..,'..',,! ;'e:,•!,',,:',"',..t.r . -,', '-• :: ';"''- .-;' .
. " .. .. •
`''s'..i'''.,..',,!-• '
' ... ,. ! •••!.! . ,-' .,‘..'f 7,,•'...,- '•--•, ..:, ..;:.'• !.-;:•, ••••,'Y',.,.::.,-.,,' i .•.•• "• . ,• .• ' , .-
. . .
. .
..", .. f •,'',-'-'.,!' ''..f-.:!.•.:.;•••r.'"-•-;,.'.' ••!•'I,:i,.".."!•..'-';:',;','• -•"'-:.','.• --• --. '.... . • • .
. . . . ,
. ,
. • ' . .•'• •,,..,.,'',, .N.'').-:::f, ', .,
. . . , .
- .. .
. ,
., • . '
I : . .
I
10
. . '' ' • .- . . •
. . , • •
. ,
. . .
•
, • t , .. , .
• ' - .
. . .
. • • - . .. .. .
, . • .... ..- ' '• - • ','.
. - • • ::,"• ' . !.: .,,•., .. • "•!.',-- •. '4,..'.,...-",,'.'r,'-,;...,..:',,.,": '. , •- • , . .
. .
. -.-.•
.._ _ ....-.. _' ......_ _• :, - .
. ., , . . .
• •
. _. . . .
.,
•
•
...
,. .
. , . .
, .
. . ,
. '" ';•. •• • .,...,• I .,..:.,..... ; ',,,,..r.,'„....• •,,..-..::,'.-..,• ...,,,,.....,\-:-.•:-.,...!...!•:, •• ., . .,,. ..•. •
. .
. , ..:•':. •-,...-.,".,.".,--•.•'..:::.-i-_;-,.-2.,:..„••'... ;-,„ . ,..'.:.,---:;;,:.-..t...:,...‘,:.;.•-•,,-„,...,-,1•..z.'.-. . .• .,•. -
• ,
. . - ' • '.',., '..'-'•,-.;;",-. ;''...,':.;',',-,,"":.,-....; ;-., •... .. •..=::;..,:' :.,....,P,:;,..--...,...,Fi,:!;,',:.!!..;.',..,•,••. .,
: - • • 1
. .
. . . .
• ,. ..: '- ..•' '":"• - .. . „, . .. :•'' ::'•.• ,,,,.1.--:',":,1,,',,-,•,•-,,:•;:.,:",:'-'.,•,,, ••••••„, • ' ,
: • ._I, ,',' ,. .•', ,••',' •• - '' •:•••••..":'..,' ..-''.',..:',;•',
,•. , •• . , •. , . . ... ,.
,1//
CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st
day of November , 19 77 , at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Renton Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, as the time and place
for a public hearing to consider the following:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, RENTON HILL PLANNING AREA (THAT AREA GENERALLY
BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE
AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON
THE SOUTH)
SEE ATTACHED MAP
Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval ,
disapproval or opinions on same.
CITY OF RENTON
Odder-ell) Q
Delores A. Mead,
City Clerk
DATE OF PUBLICATION
October 21 , 1977
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
' I , hereby certify that
( ) copies of the above notice were posted by me in three or more conspicuous
places on the property described and two copies were posted at the Renton
Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South, Renton, WA on date of
19
Signed
ATTEST:
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing in Renton
6/76
CITY OF RENTON
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY
RENTON CITY COW
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Renton City Council has fixed the 21st_
day of November__ 19_77 , at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Renton Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, as the time and place
for a public hearing to consider the following:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, RENTON HELL PLANNING AREA (THAT AREA GENERALLY
BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE
AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE FAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON
THE SOUTH)
SEE ATTACHED MAP
Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval ,
disapproval or opinions on same.
CITY OF RENTON
b-efores A. Meao,
City Clerk
DATE OF PUBLICATION
October 21 , 1977__ _____
1.. .. A- ,, • .?„7 .\S\,.‘'',\'•A1 1,A;'\'•,*%\
e,,°\,,\ -,,-,1 5:(;7/".„ ) 't i:9?!I1:..:p..t.,,,isi.,1•1.42,tr,,:,,.':N-I.k.t;.1,i'1 nz-'o.•p3I..:iit_,i,r•.d.,,•r•1.,J, .--.t,.',.. i;3..I1A4l,1.4,1c5i-s- l..4,,.-.-,i,,' t,ita,l, :,l*i-l"ea,a'i I ,1..,:::,1,,•
t...•g4.+i 4,„4-tL-.1.,,/r-.w,-u,, '11% . _
iiiPtn ir
/ Ii,.'•,":1.r
,
.. .
L
L t. • 0.,.., .., ... _ . ,i i.l.
ciar3 - . . ,
\ ,,,,,,, i d IC-
• .4 :-.1i- 'I II, ,..11ji.%. . ..ii ct-',:- 21 I- *1.AI_ • .1/„.; • .<4,! , 4'
49' ,...-.
I '11Z1 :1 4 IT i',4 ,::J.' .,,,/' .' , ,-" ' --'
. • .41 u ..1 i .1.--• 2.4).. g .4 i,,--:24:7 7 .,,,• )t.,.,.. , (
_ ..
. z, . • , . -4 Lty
4,ir I. .1 tl elt :- .1,•.-14,-1', 1 ., It . // / • / --)
EIt ,i, I , ..1 1 ,...-." .t.,4 v A, ..
4 1, 1, 1, 4. .. .. . • . - I
. •• `.... •.1,,1. .4, WI 4 4.. . II Li -1 • ',
4. "47 ' :•1 (1/ l'/"'' /7' , , , •,,,, „ - . .4 i_
. • , , ).,
• . -
, . • . , •,,, ,...•..I. L___ . ,.... . [i i(r. ,
WAY' ' ;el ..• ''L‘ •`, • ' ' ' 'r'' •• r '• "R if- 1 . •,5'
„1:117174.1,14r,j_ri7,i7;0,.1 l' . s\\y 1 ,,-,. , .. t,liji .1.4,, ci..ir:..,,t.ill',....: ! s .;,,,!J . 1.il 1 i yr/ / ,
I •
.., •(4-:..4' ..• • f ,
• • 1 I a r l• : ''. ' . ' ."•e• ' f• - ',1 '' 44 . ''' -- ".•,14'5.)y / : .1,'', i 4'r'-•-•• rl
•
..
. . .
N. ., ,„, J,.. 1 I., ,,......,
• I. 1 A :34.t.4 ...,,,,4 /..
. '...,..\ t• ..,.. r
...," •1 vi,--/-N\• / I.L..
• . t r,...).,11." • '• I
• • . ......, ,., , . . 'k ,!..,4.,,,,c.,, 1 1 A r R T y .•
' ,- • ‘.'t*,%. ).4 a ; 0. , 5 .--- , ,,:`/ I '',..,' 1:: 1...• ,t-', ' r,
. /if r I • t • . N: - N4 4..„)••I • ...nrt i . • ,-1 oil. Ilu Ti ,.. . •1
i.al ,4 1 11.\ i 1. . : , ...,,•;•1„...,, .\,,,c-",,„5,j• i'L , A,' f• '\ . . . • 1 ' li
i `11[1.: /
Z :.:4., '" (. 4 !VIP, ,. le: 1 -J. .,)N•'.. ' ,.-i DAR c4 IVE,I . X, i I
. I. 4 c9 " ! '
P.'•17...
." '' '' '.- • 4 - 4, 1-iit .00'
I • I I ... , 1•41 ••, N. ,
4 • . . re .1. . ... '.:.ap. •r,' , z
a a . 1. i Hi•.1,', :di.is e..; ''''.*. N-‘..".......... i ,'..,, .
4 ! -I • .'''03."r ..' ,' . _./ .
r
, ..., . _ . ,
.. z., ,..., .-.... ---
Ft ..; 1. 31...;,: •. ;, .... ,, , . ,
„...>. / „„ _ _. -._ /----/
'4*: :. 1. :.-.... •.:. r ,' ''. . .wul'r l'a .., ''. It !'' ''.t• -/,' - . '
F..<,!.. ,,,,' ::i i! •,t t;i. 1... r ,: .E., .,s; ,, .. ... .ii,...,,p
,.:1„. . i. . ..",,j ,: ,,p, „,,...-.: elp 7,4f..• 7 ,;.,,,,,,.
4,/$,••• 7:!','-' ' 1.; .I .,:q . ,, i, '11 ,,,:›• ,' .t ,„or''•
i
. '
. _
,• , 4,,.? !. ., • J I,, ..III. ., K :, 11.:... „.... e
....a..1 II in,' .1.1.••! I!• '' ' ','' ' .I.. 5' ' .." '. I or''' ,
, --.::"Ok -----•...
i '. '14 , el: !I - ', I . . 1 t ' 0't .,•4 r. iirl .. 4; iri..._, .. . .... ;.: r it .r,„,,,,,.., .; } .., ,. . • ,,... „i... . .
-,--.. . N,‘ •.
,..,. ., it qiiiis., .., .•
% to ,', . 4. 7 . •! 1.5 '' 3.• ''7%•••• .1
•• 14 .:. '' . • ••• I• - .. • 'a'
.0 0..1. i• t .
•. .0 I. . , • % • 1* i ". P •• , N%
''.•7. 41'In r .1•; . a' • . ,, • • . 1 1.. ' 4 ' • . - .t .
•••..1 19
•
‘/•'41".••••• U0(414,Me/. / • ••„0 :, if/ /,,/ ! /''' 04! I . “:1 ' .• it '`'l • • • ' "4. . ‘4.'4' S. •• .I.4., .4 i #711,, I'D 1,., ;qt 4, :iy.i' -- '1. ., .1 ..,i % ,. .
. : i! '''' ' • '`,' 1 . .11). ‘
1 ,
.1, '•:,i• '• i . ,;z „
II(
41' .:•.04 ,I .: i; •,0 1,. L,..,-- , i 41. ., i- , '
... ,...• ."*„.1..' :;"•ii, -1 , .• " -4". '' ' '''>?1 ' .... r, ;:t,.. ...s ,- ,
1 . .
Jr ••-.
, „., • :: •I• •I- % ', La : ,.
e. ,, ..,,•!0. f, ,. ii gil:. ,, .tt.• 1 ••1 iv ...id . . ,. , . . . A . .s. .. ... 4 I • •
' •J
i
: ,. • - ti , ,
1, I.; '4 i, i •,:l I' i "1 r.:, • .1, 'I .•, ' • • ,'i •' 1. 'rri• • )... •., Id
;.-- .0, 1 ,4,,;, - ,., I,• .:..., ,, • f+‘ ; ,. .. i
. il . •..r ' N. 'T• .
. „, - ..
•7-ii. Act': 4ty i ri- 111 t ,, r .7 ,... 4, .. . ,...,„
i,i,-!. 41c.4:. .,. .„4-.., ; •.4. .4 4 .. . N .• 6". .:. sii •IP•: 43 ,,li, . se
! ••••••••••..„.
-0..1 4/): • :,,fa.. ':, 4 1. * ; i. . ; ,. /,', ' •, ' 1 ''''a . . '41 ''',fr I ' .
' ------,___•• •• 1 . a*II I' a I • • '' :a • N '. ..'. , ,,1. .. -• jra : r!a. 1 1 14 - i
• , -. r :, ti,
A, .t.i . i[. ! .
,.. 7.' ,.. ... .• . :.,1 •
1 •
- ', ' ,! ',' ;•'. • i ,t
,-, . •
. .
• , ;- , 1' ..
, I -.. IP ,Z 41 . I •. •
----
' •.1 ; 1; 1 ' ' '..
. • 4 •I r ' 1 ' • ......I I. J.41,'' ,, • .1 . , . I.,g
,,. . • .. . ,i ",,„.. I • ••••_, ,...
c.,
I • ,.., , • 14 i 14 a.
' in 41 il-: et . 3. •• \ •
. •
: 0/ '. •.' 'r r ", . ' • •1 I s •
'' tt.' •..1: '. ;• .•4 - :•,-..4,••-7 i ..1
.--
't ; \ •
•
I la • ,4 IP , .g i wi ,. •,..,
..,
40' I .1441 .' .' \ •
.V.V.."'
, . 1.... . •j: .: \
00. . 0 ' • • '.\ 4.41.11 ' ] 1. . . . L •,f I
s• it ..,ilt N. ..
\ a k'''' 4•-
..1
1 '
4•
. .
I ,. ..---
' Ls, • 44 c''' '•
• ,.(..
. • I LI, •.....71+ .
ja 1
...: •'-'1,4 .
s\r . 1
'' •
.,. I ,,,
-
II(' .
.. ,,
, t H . . 1.., , •
•i '.. . a • .
. .. •, •
. . . . .. ..1 1
• '
.7:: Q ' i • . • .
. .
. .
, •-Li .
• :'--Z.. ;-1 .L• -- .
. ,
#1 ,0
1 ,
...,•1 . .., . ,
ue• , t „; 1 _
•? .,'' .'1[\'' •:/. '.\n \''\\s.' ••,..t,
i
.$71'' •' .
. .
• 4 . PP, J ,,,
• ' ' .---:J3 4o. .•.. .1.iI• . .i.. • :al •.05-41 if/1
I n+ rI x'.'•
.• \\. ' 4..1,4','•7..,..
' e
•
4/ 4 45 \ • .4,
'• .
. I . \ '\ , / - • •• .
4 3& fel
../
/:•,'•-•-•---- .----7-,,,t\l.
•,,,,,...
•
4p F Ft
THE CITY OF RENTON
tL' ' 7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
Z :pitw L+''q ..- O
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD
•pp CITY CLERK
�QrED SEF'1
00
October 19, 1977
MEMORANDUM
TO: Renton Planning Commission
FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk
RE: Comprehensive Land Use Planning
The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting of October 17,
1977, has directed that the Planning Commission be notified of
Council intent that the Commission' is to consider only the
Comprehensive Land Use Planning for the City of Renton, the
matter of zoning under jurisdiction of the Hearing Examiner.
•
•
•
•
/ — INTER—OFFICE MEMO
TO: Les Phillig;-Public Viu-As Dept. DA11dctober 19, 1977
FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk
RE: Publi > Hearing - Comprehensive Plan, Renton Hill Planning Area
Enclosed are 20 copies of the above-captioned Public Hearing notices. Please post
in the area and return certification to this office. Thanks.
çIiV
apCis,,71.44\ r cY1
0.117) 1F1 ° 5f-
41 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
U •i ;> '
va � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
Z 3. o
n Q d;'41 :.. O1 CHARLES J. DELAURENT I MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD
t.
4 CITY CLERK
0
4,4lfD SEP'ity.
DEVILED
MEMORANDUM
TO: Renton Planning Commission
FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk
RE: Comprehensive Land Use Planning - Renton Hill
The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting of October 17,
1977, has directed that the Planning Commission be advised of
Council action as follows: MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH,
PLANNING COMMISSION BE NOTIFIED THAT INTENT OF MOTION ON 6/6/77
WAS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THIS TIME TO CONSIDER ONLY
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED. City Attorney Shellan noted
per ordinance, that the jurisdiction for rezoning is with the
Land Use Hearing Examiner and the primary function with the
Planning Commission is change in Comprehensive Plan and also
recommendations on zoning changes areawide.
•
` 77 - 77
•
o THE CITY .OF RENTON
U �� © MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
r.,
, °; CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR , • PLAN R
NING DEPARTMENT
?,o co• 235-2550
��.
OEO SEP-
October 14 , 1977
The Honorable C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor
Members of the City Council
Renton , Washington
•
RE : PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ,
RENTON HILL PLANNING .AREA (THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY
FAI-405 ON THE WEST , CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH , THE
- HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST , AND THE
POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY _ ON THE SOUTH)
Dear Mayor and Council Members :
The Planning Commission submits for your consideration recom-
mendations regarding the above described area. This action is
pursuant to the City = Council . re'ferral - and - request of June 6 ,
- 1977 . .
•
The Planning Commissi_o.n has conducted a -series of public
hearings . a-nd work meetings regarding the .Renton Hill area ,
including a detailed analysis .of land. use , circulation , and
community facilities : The . analysis and recommendation of. the •
Comprehensive Planning Committee is. submitted .in the attached
report dated October 12 , 1977 :
. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission public hearing
of October 12th , the Planning Commission concurred in the
recommendations of the Comprehensive Planning Committee and
forwarded the committee report to .you for your consideration .
• It is recommended that the City Council set November 21st as
a public hearing date on the said recommendations . ' Your con-.
currence • is respectfully requested .
Very tru. y yours ;
o don Y . .' is sen
P anningl rector
GYE :Wr
Attachments ' •
k•8T-P.k t
h
-
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT
OCTOBER 12 , 1977
TO : Planning Commission Members
FROM: Clark Teegarden , Chairman
Comprehensive Planning Committee
RE : CITY COUNCIL REFERRAL - RENTON HILL AREA
REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING
INTRODUCTION :
By action of the Planning Commission at its public hearing meeting
on the above subject matter, the Comprehensive Planning Committee
was requested to study the area in question and report back to the
Commission on October 12, 1977. The attached public hearing notice
(public hearing, September 14 , 1977 ) describes the area to be con-
sidered and is generally defined as the Renton Hill Comprehensive
Planning Area . (Refer to Public Hearing Notice. )
For the purposes of the Committee ' s deliberations , the Comprehensive
Plan is defined as the offical statement of the City of Renton
establishing major policies concerning desirable future development.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - DEFINITION AND PURPOSE :
The Comprehensive Plan consists of the Goals , Objectives , and Poli-
cies ; Land Use Element; Circulation Element; Community Facilities
Element ; and Definitions . Proposed developments should be reviewed
against the Comprehensive Plan. to insure that growth is consistent.
with the Plan .
The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are :
To improve the physical and social environment of the
city as a setting for human activities - to make it more
functional , beautiful , decent , healthful , interesting ,
and efficient;
•
•
PUBLIC NOTICE •
PUBLIC HEARING
CITY• OF RENTON
• PLANNING COMMISSION
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION
IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON
SEPTEMBER 14, 1977, AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM
DESCRIBED BELOW:
♦
PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA,
PARTICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE
IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA
IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR
RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE
EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH.
•
H • It 1. p A - . . _ - _' _ \.. ..
________ \\
J adll ;1.y . L_ 1 �tEi.„ ;. 1 1 .,1.T --.
.: _g.'... _ Fill iii[...I., .1 "-',- '--'
, (`'1 F r g F
1 ii:34til- i;.-. .rr,i,:il .10 '411 i,.:ii,:::';41.,- :- ‘ \
Itcr. tiniV`7,jk:.:1.1V1-11: 4-. -- -q Ili..,,,:1[:-.. ..- ,
' -,1---4,--- -.
itt _:
,�,}pi�g g t , f- 11! f
k2„.11‘..-",,,
r.;(4.-- „-.4--, -,,,, ig
, 1:.11
•'-fi-It,.,s.1
f'-k':L.•f.:l--i1f
-'.• l:h.-.e. • p1i1Iii1.I1i: 1 L?'n'L,-..I r1-__---;-1.-_i-t..,-.-t'..-.-t-.
4 �I':= IFT�' ff j_ Il,:,-,-..„1..---,.{i l'-,-‘•,-7::...-d.7_--1-].;,
-''' '--
, . .
;. ;. y ' i 4,, III _1, , _ ' - _ ', -.. ,
`-1-'- -7A ;, F i., gip; \
1 7/. , ''. .. .11 # • 14:t .1., ; „'::. '''.',;., ,
a vc
1,, w r `�c
11 ., L i _. d ? P gP
., / t:::--- -------------- 1 - --- 1-_-s-,:•-----cp-,-,affi-ti .
THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT
COMMENTS IN WRITING.
IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT:
,. CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550
MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S.
RENTON, WA. 98055 ,
•
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Two
• To promote the public interest, the interest of the city
at large as well as the interests of individuals , or
special groups ;
• To facilitate the democratic determination and implementa-
tion of city policies on development ;
® To effect political and technical coordination in
development;
S To inject long-range considerations into the determination
of short-range actions ; and
® To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on
the making of political decisions on the development of the
city.
The Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as a guide to help resolve
some of the development problems confronting municipal officials and
the people they represent. The Plan takes into account existing con-
ditions and future needs , and attempts to express the best reasonable
consensus that can be achieved at a given time as to the character
and direction of future growth .
The Plan is of necessity general in its proposals . It must be flexible ,
since it is impossible to predict all future events which may affect
the community. The Plan is not a zoning ordinance , although it makes
significant recommendations for future land use. The Plan is not pre-
cise. It does not represent engineering accuracy , nor does it claim
to predict exactly the future use of every parcel of property , or
insure that growth is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan .
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Three
In order for the Plan to maintain effectiveness , it should be reviewed
periodically. Conditions might change and unforeseen events may occur
which might necessitate a re-evaluation.
BACKGROUND: •
As background to the study of the area in question , the Committee con-
ducted a field trip of the area involved and studied in detail the
existing land use , the characteristics of the existing development, and
the physical features of the land, including topography and drainage .
During the course of the work sessions by the committee , representatives
from property owners in the Hill area were present and provided input
in the matters discussed. The matter of access was considered in some
detail in terms of the existing street rights-of-way, traffic circulation ,
existing street conditions , the parking and access problems to individual
properties , as well as the matter of general traffic circulation .
The study area for comprehensive planning purposes overlapped into
adjacent areas ; and, therefore, the study of the committee encompasses
areas beyond the immediate boundaries of the Renton Hill area , particu-
larly as it relates to traffic circulation , potential development,
need for community facilities , and general area-wide impact of future
development.
The consideration of the committee was basically restricted to con-
sideration of the Comprehensive Plan elements : land use , circulation ,
and community facilities . In regard to said elements , the natural
characteristics of the area were also considered.
•
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Four
LAND USE ELEMENT:
FINDINGS :
1 . The Renton Hill area is primarily a single family residential
neighborhood with some limited apartment and duplex use inter-
mixed. The extent of multi -family residential development is
limited at this time and is primarily concentrated along Mill
Avenue South and located westerly of Cedar.
2. Physical characteristics of the area indicate that, while an older
area of the community, the area is basically sound in terms of
both building and general physical potential for upgrading . This
potential is presently being recognized by many property owners
in the area , and the area is considered a desirable single family
residential neighborhood.
3. While the area has been in a state of transition , with increased
land values , the physical amenities of the Hill area , such as view,
makes the area highly desirable for residential development.
4. The existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for Renton
Hill is primarily single family residential with low and medium
density multi -family residential designations between Mill Avenue
South and Cedar Avenue South and extending southerly to and includ-
ing a larger tract of medium density multi -family residential
located at the southwesterly edge of the Hill area . The hillside
areas to the north are presently designated as greenbelt, with
the existing industrial development adjacent to the railroad
right-of-way and a low density multi -family designation to the
Compreh_e.ns•ive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Five
north adjacent to the Cedar River.
5. The area includes several large tracts of undeveloped areas ,
which represent both potential single family and multi -family
residential development. Development in accordance with the
present plan would result in increased land use densities .
6. The Committee also reviewed the geological conditions of the
Hill area , including consideration regarding mines previously
located in the area. It was initially recognized that the Hill
has large underlying coal beds , some of these beds having been
mined-out. Said coal beds represent not only a future energy
resource potential but also a hazard to any surface development
in terms of possible mine subsidance. The extent of such
development hazard is unknown and will vary with location . It
is recognized, however, such hazards must be considered in
terms of existing and future development.
CIRCULATION:
1 . The Committee initially recognizes that the present circulation
to Renton Hill is restricted to one access point (at Third and
Mill ) , which essentially creates a large cul -de-sac-type situation .
2. The present 40 foot street rights-of-way restrict access and
limit parking, particularly in that area north of South 7th
Street. The existing topography precludes any substantial
improvement of existing rights-of-way to allow improved access
and parking.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Six
3. The parking for the residential uses is primarily on-street
rather than off-street; and it is recognized that topography
limitations preclude , in many cases, development of acceptable
off-street parking spaces .
4. Increased traffic has occurred as the result of the extensive
use of Phillip Arnold Park located at the top of the Hill .
This impact is particularly noticeable on Renton Avenue . On-street
parking has also impacted the adjacent residential neighborhood .
5 . The existing Arterial Street Plan indicates the extension of
Mill Avenue extending in a southeast direction , connecting to a
secondary arterial serving the Tiffany Park area. The present
Plan also projects the extension of Grant Avenue South from South
11th to Puget Drive.
6. The extension of Mill Avenue South with the connection as proposed
does not appear to be physically feasible due to the existing devel -
opment that has occurred and the steep topography.
7. New development of any type would, in the opinion of the committee ,
further impact the existing circulation system unless alternative
means of access were provided to serve the area. The Committee
further recognizes , however, that providing additional access
could further compound the existing problem and make the situation
more critical .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . The existing park has been utilized as a facility serving beyond
the immediate neighborhood. The basic result has been an increase
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Seven
in traffic circulation problems beyond those created by the
immediate residents of the Hill area.
2. The existing park facility , however, is fully developed and is
used intensively by the community at large. The Renton School District
presently has a 10 acre elementary school site located easterly
of said park. A school development at this site is not contem-
plated at this time or in the near future, due to the limited
elementary population that might potentially attend said school .
NATURAL SYSTEMS :
1 . The Hill area , due to its nature , has large undeveloped hillside
areas with steep slopes , providing a natural greenbelt drainage
system.
2. Disturbance through new development represents a potential hazard
in terms of slides and increased runoff problems .
RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based on its analysis , the Committee recommends as follows :
LAND USE:
1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill area,
the Committee recommends that the Hill area north of the Puget
Sound Power and Light Company transmission right-of-way be
•
designated as single family residential .
2. The steep hillside areas , powerline rights-of-way, and natural
drainage courses be established as greenbelt areas , in addition
to those presently designated on the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan .
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12, 1977
Page Eight
CIRCULATION :
1 . The land use designations as reflected in the existing Compre-
hensive Plan was based upon provision of additional access to the
Renton Hill area to the south and southeast. The extension of
Mill Avenue South is not physically feasible ; and , therefore,
it is recommended by the Committee that such designation on the
Arterial Street Plan be deleted.
2. Extensive input on the part of the residents in the Hill area
indicates the desire to continue the limited access to the Hill
(Third and Mill ) as it is presently constituted. , The purpose of
such limitation is to enhance the amenities of the Hill area as
a residential community and preclude through access . It is ,
therefore , further recommended that the proposed Grant Avenue
connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of
access to the Hill .
3. It is recognized that improved access will be necessary to serve
the properties to the south and southeast of the Renton Hill area
at such time as they are developed. The intent of the Committee ' s
recommendations is that such access be provided from the south .
COMMUNITY FACILITIES :
1 . Retain the present community facilities designations for the Renton
Hill area, including the park and school site , recognizing that the
use of the school site for an elementary school may or may not be
feasible in the near future.
Comprehensive Planning Committee Report
October 12 , 1977
Page Nine
2. The Committee further recommends that the City pursue the possibil -
ity of expansion of Phillip Arnold Park to the southeast , since it
appears that the potential area would allow reasonable expansion
of said facility.
3. The area designated low density multi -family residential adjacent
to the Cedar River north of the railroad be redesignated future
recreation .
y; E.
Renton City Council
10/17/77 Page 3
Consent Agenda - Continued
Rezone and Letter from Hearing Examiner Beeler presented recommendation of
Special Use 9/29/77 Malibu Grand Prix Corp. Rezone R-065-77 GS-1 to B-1 and
Permit Special Use Permit application SP-067-77 for proposed midget car
Malibu Grand Prix driving skill facility and amusement center on six acres located
Corporation between FAI 405 and SW Grady Way, west of Cummins Diesel site. The
R-065-77 Examiner recommended approval of rezone and denial of Special Permit.
SP-067-77 Letter of appeal included from Richard C. Denttof Norwich-Kaiser-
Appeal Dentt, San Diego Calif. , appeal re Special Use Permit, claiming error
in judgement on the part of the Hearing Examiner. Refer to the
Planning and Development Committee for recommendation.
Crestview Manor Letter of appeal from Frances L. Creager, 2216 NE 12th St. , of the
Preliminary Plat Hearing Examiner's decision on the proposed Crestview Manor #1
Appeals located on Blaine Ave. NE between NE 14th St. and NE 12th St.
opposed Examiner's decision for placement of walkway near Creager
residence. Letter of appeal from 14 area property owners (first
name - Wayne N. Wicks, 1323 Dayton Ave. NE) opposed connection of
Blaine Ave. NE and Dayton Ave. NE as recommended by the Hearing,
Examiner for Crestview Manor #1 Preliminary Plat application,
referred to the Planning and Development Committee on 10/10/77.
Refer to Planning and Development Committee the two appeal letters
for inclusion with Crestview Manor #1 appeal and for recommendation.
Harold W. Hill Letter from Hearing Examiner Beeler recommended approval of the
Rezone R-081-77 Harold W. Hill application for Rezone (R-081-77) G to MP for prop-
erty located along the east side of West Valley Road south of
Northwest Hobby and Toy Co. for the purpose of attaining compati-
bility of a small portion of total site presently zoned MP and
intended for development of an office/warehouse/manufacturing
facility. . Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
LID 307 Letter from City Clerk Mead reported petition filed for street
Street improvement (LID #307) Raymond Ave. SW from SW 17th St. southerly
Improvement approximately 1,200 feet, petition having been certified valid
Raymond Ave SW by the Public Works Department as representing 100% ownership of
the front footage proposed for improvement. The letter submitted
Public Hearing the preliminary assessment roll in total sum of $297,352. 18 and
11/14/77 recommended referral to the Ways and Means Committee for resolution
setting date of public hearing on 11/14/77. Refer to Ways and
Means Committee for resolution setting public hearing.
Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Delaurenti declared October 23 - 30, 1977 as
Toastmistress Wk. Toastmistress Week in Renton.
Comprehensive Letter from Planning Director Ericksen submitted Planning Commission
Plan for 'recommendation concerning the Comprehensive Plan of Renton Hill
Renton Hill Planning Area (Generally bound by FAI-405 on the west, Cedar River
Public Hearing i on the north, the hillside and undeveloped area on the east and the
11/21/77 powerline right-of-way on the south) . The letter recommended Council
set 11/21/77 as public hearing date to consider the recommendation.
Council set public hearing as recommended.
Hearing Examiner Letter from the Hearing Examiner presented comparison of Hearing
Procedures Examiner procedures in other jurisdictions, making recommendation
for City' s procedure. The Hearing Examiner' s letter was presented
to Council by Mayor Delaurenti 's recommendation for referral to
Planning and Development Committee. Council refer to Planning and
Development Committee.
Consent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS
Approval PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
Appropriation Letter from Deputy Finance Director Bennett reported recent increase
A Garbage Service in garbage rates coupled with previous increases in dump fees make it
necessary to increase the appropriation for garbage service by $172,000
and the appropriation for payments to the Tax Commission by $300.
I
Renton City Council
10/17/77 Page 4
Correspondence and Current Business - Continued
Garbage Letter from Deputy Finance Director Bennett recommended referral to
Continued the Ways and Means Committee for proper ordinance. MOVED BY PERRY,.
SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. Councilman Stredicke
inquired re change in King County scale system, being advised by
Bennett that scales go into effect about 11/1/77 with probable
change in rates at that time. Public Works Director Gonnason antici-
pated letter next Monday indicating rate increase. Councilman Perry
noted being advised in committee meeting of $50,000 surplus in the
garbage fund and asked Administration for clarification by next week.
Mayor Delaurenti asked Deputy Finance Director to handle request.
MOTION CARRIED.
Advance Refunding Letter from Seattle-Northwest Securities Corporation requested meet-
Water & Sewer ing to discuss advance refunding of 9/1/54, 5/1/65 and 12/15/65
Revenue Bonds water and sewer revenue bonds, having previously met with Finance
Director and Deputy. The letter explained purpose that new refund-
ing bonds issued on a parity of lien with the 1976 refunding bonds
and eliminate the 1 .5 coverage requirement; new coverage require-
ment would be 1 .3 on all the water and sewer debt or annual reduction
in debt service of approximately $65,000. The letter noted second
benefit of refunding program with reduction of in debt service of
approximately $43,700. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER
MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION.
Councilman Stredicke noted reduction in funds of $100,000 for
application to Senior Citizen Center, being advised by Deputy Finance
Director Bennett that savings on water and sewer bond issues are
Utility Fund and not General Fund savings; Stredicke inquiring re
transfer/appropriation. MOTION CARRIED.
OLD BUSINESS Council President read 6/6/77 Council minutes regarding petition
from Renton Hill citizens to review zoning in area and action taken
Comprehensive with substitute motion by Shinpoch that Council refer request for
Plan - single family zoning to the Planning Commission and Hearing Examiner,
Renton Hill which motion carried. Perry reported discussion re intent of divi-
sion of responsibilities and tasks and PERRY MOVED, SECOND SHINPOCH,
PLANNING COMMISSION BE NOTIFIED THAT INTENT OF MOTION ON 6/6/77
WAS FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THIS TIME TO CONSIDER ONLY THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CARRIED. City Attorney Shellan noted per
ordinance, that the jurisdiction for rezoning is with the Land Use
Hearing Examiner and the primary function with Planning Commission
is change in Comprehensive Plan and also recommendations on zoning
changes areawide. (See earlier setting of public hearing)
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry submitted com-
Development mittee report recommending Council support the request of the King
Committee Report County Council to introduce proposed King County Motion 77-237 to the
Joint Sphere of State Legislature, being enabling legislation to allow cities and
Influence counties to establish joint sphere of influence. MOVED BY STREDICKE,
SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Off-Site The committee report recommended changes to the ordinance following
Improvements review of procedures for granting deferrals, exceptions , variances
and waivers by City Board and Land Use Hearing Examiner, as follows:
(a) Ordinance creating the Bd. of Public Works Code 6-2-606 member-
ship - restructure membership to include Director of Public Works,
Director of Parks and Recreation, Director of Planning, Fire Chief
and Traffic Engineer (deleting Airport Director and Finance Director.
(b) Duties 6-2-602E, revise changing work "variances" to "deferments"
adding after thereto "deferments shall not exceed 24 months. " (c)
Add new section allowing granting of deferred off site improvements
by Board of Public Works, adding statement that such deferments
may be granted for reasonable cost not to exceed a period of two
years. The report noted committee will continue to review and study
Council policy regarding this subject. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND
PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Councilman Perry noted policy change that deferments shall not exceed
24 months and deferment shall not be granted unnecessarily; previous
policy left open-ended deferments , such as at time of LID in area.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, REFER ORDINANCE CHANGES TO THE WAYS
AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
5i
)
;_ We the undersigned residents and property owners of
Renton Hill wish to express our opposition to the building
of any additional multiple dwellings at the upper end of ✓p,i G �f
Cedar Avenue South. We also oppose the zoning, planning /
or building of multiple dwellings or industrial concerns
in any other area of Renton Hill, or any adjacent area that Lc)
might require access or right of way through our community.
Our basic reasoning for the above opposition is that
we are concerned about increased traffic, congestion , park-
ing problems, noise pollution , crime against personal property
and any other difficulties that arise from sudden large pop-
ulation increases within a given community.
We wish to make this opposition known to any and all -------R \
interested parties® OF ``
/CD 0',
AUG 26 1977
._. Date Name Address '9p ".<jf
/7- 7/ 4 1 L 3f' , 4 ,,e . I
1 1- / a/6 I S .
2-/7- 77 ,. rtd. s � 607 �- a --- ,1
:-/7- 7 _7 -7 7_,e..,-tc ee_I-ee___ ____
®
. LA, _,\,t,,L...a,„,
::-..11:77 \ ..,. ..s- __ _ . n_ _ _;=2.e.q _i.wr..,1?_-,7-j1L12.,-- .---).D
l t l /7 d R l it e1✓Vv S
-2 (s6/�4
r- I%1 I alzv , t
riLl..zi. i -6--- '
g6r L
t/1 b 7
_ ,`Date. ,ATame Address
,7 - m - -7 .7 (30.4._
,,,_,L.,,' /1/4 o - ,..S76 -7 <-6C Va.7,11
R-) '- 77 it (A) 609 GRi46v �ve ,
rzd-Vki
APn fay
-ig - 7 7 li) coefir &O 9 c4).0 -0/6-tos4) --,&06-,
gJig_ rig gas o.
gs -/ F- 77 ,.-L.-, ,_ /y,1s ,51
S _/r 7 7uitaleAL ,,o 6;y0 ? .i.J .(iz&, g..
cc- ( r , a/11-ty ,?, A/1,1-4411 6' )-0 cc. th_? a,,,, s--_
r y-/ — 77 ,/-4i c e/r. *__,„,..:, ,,,,..6,-- . ,- (,,,
r ' 8 -/0_ 77 '%'� � - /%I/7— Sate%
/ er--/F 77
.trty---..2.--a._) /6-6,/r&a,e-6-r_e__) 1.0,r3t.__,S
.-. tt- 77 U
1) a_ ttt
. --c--e/
3:
--a-7? 4/iiiw i- kp 41. 7 . /2 -C
S�0- 77 ) 5. t .
g-/e 7 �1-�,-c=e A /O S` 4-
- 7 _7 5. & c-- . i 327e. Le , ,
S` /A - 77 532 6R.9A.l7- 1? , So
8- 2 8 - 7 7 /32 •r'R.vr /a d,E, So.
/ X/6- s/3.-e__ __Avi
8 /e - 7 -7 or c' 141� �
y
' 1 2 7 -moo 23 5„Q i�o -I.)
�- « -- '6 % • ►g l �� `�
G j- 2 o
, _ , , fLivrrr ,rwirionimr-, a...,...i_j ,, ., ,iipromimmimpr- , / / / ,4Awl.-_,Atr--, i„,_„0,,,,
$�/5 -77 i --
0 .., .6146---5 --- ,Z----,:q6-,1
1 \\ - I - 77 4 P v f 3 /y- s 0 .-2 A7-
Date Name Address
2-- 1.7- "/ • )1A-61(1,:11\ 1 ,_)t---(12-nik (1,(g .ei2AimA.--au-e_ -
8 - / 7- 7 7 . zy.et,- -.0:,- 1// , 9053 i_„(_,Ylk_Acl - :
/7- 77 6a`,/` 91� a�..k , . e • .
Zili 7 77 k 40 , ‘ a/5 . ,
- 77 � � : ; - -gor a-e . • . z
1. , 7 dr o;(- s.,v
, / 7- 0 /
77 76 /47// ‹�
_ - / 7- /) 7 _,,:e.g. &-2� � C .
C7 - / ? 7 7 /��2jC(�J,/ �� 2i-�i � 6 Z 7 r oc% /cry.
1' / 7- 7 7 i, 77 �- - '. '� ' / ;-X- - :_
r- / 1- 7 7 .0 L �t� 3.s . � � ,-e. SSA
. - I 'i- "1"—i 51-kaqt, . 535 Ow-Q._ -
. ?) 117— 7 17 em.i4 ' • /pi a..
r- /7-- 77 j27� , 1/. '� . l% .,� 2, •
' q - Zo --j-) Y kcr : ,5 0 /_1 1zr , G -
i,--. 20 - 77 4_7_,,,x., v.o_________,-1-7,,?.. ,-. ?._,,,__ - , - -- -_,4,i -2, ,__S- ,
'/2� > 7 9 -,.,, - ,7� _ .Rf r X/-,-., <6". " .
J //7 7 rIA.la .,iA;0,,,41,,� 3/s R�e4 , a . .. , , .
./ // 72 7ia, friz6 = °Ylk 3 /6-R� � . .4 ,
• FA, 7 7 ,A/, vim. •�"�°--- -,-, - ,- '' ,,< -.,,.., 6,::,,.„ j , .
7/P 177 ' , t II-1(41/ . . . ' get) ` e--1-<--2—e. de, ,, ...),L, • . ':- : .
g`0-/ - 7 7 .�-a- .z.,, cj, o--�'.e...,.,t J1'o �-vk af- ,/ i '
F', 2/ •: 1, , a 6). 66,,,,k.
, _
. , .3).,6 s*,,__,;;;,_
. i-- 2 i.- .? L____)„,,A '. L.-a}. . -,94.....-•iz . .,. - 3 .c.- 7 k.p/vt',/Loy ) , _:L.,,I,Lez,4-,L-
-Zl -17 ' G ,; o .. _" ' ' .z , �P;ti• • Ge-c� 5c,: .
' r .e
)- 1-. Dal;e . Name Address
624(4 /6 77 1 722 lit -d---
r, 1 k, 1
' ' • 13e41.47_2-
A ,-
i4&;6d, C. 3„,J_,4cD
I, I , tI
._
)1/ .,
q° 0 M 11_(. -A--- gb
/fil cz ./ ,Z-,
' e I le . /0 6 6- 7/l7,' Ai ._-- c,0,
&rytaLo P, "Yrteildtkoz- /009 21,/ / ,/9 , ge ,
or )7) /oO .-,d
i
).-/-e -- .
- -/-- eV ‘- i k
((
---,
/ /t / r r- / 05- sX (--.
2 - J - -7 7 --:/-1.-e? ,./ .46--e.e:= /" /,9, , .&,)the.,.4
3 - ) -72 ( Kin)-2-20, gari-Jrvi-g) /660 — 4h9i a4
. if _ / k- '7 7 pbo,,,,,,t,:, at,ii-eA/ 90 c4 -i/t ,1
a - (s---7 ? )ka.,/,6„,- 5 .
- i S- 77 321ka6 Alla. CJ/ rifLo/1..1- . •
-77 ) -&-diA,L1" ..tv-ri ,e,} , c/aio et.i„-E-_„u a„Le . .
1_1,4/1127 V
X- - G------ e------ L.-------
77 )1--. ' et-r-e a-4.( JL,_. -763,
• 8 -A - 77 4-yL, L (- (ziAtv / 106 ),!1A41-6tYcJ Oi/E.
2-4 - 1 PilLiitiot-ge /
1(
(.3
e '-,<- 2/ 3 Re-4L4 4-) 664 C
( ' '7. ---77GZ-LZ..er P4( 1 iCa''4'&''t-- a.,„ 4,
g- -Ri/ - 77 • /7 " Mg Aft/2-- /r ,.9, ,
- ,..,, _75.,..#r i,„,,,,,i _, r/Lj-e2,4 ,e___.
,2 at-i7 // GlyN,7/}Ze. ,55. /Z,
6'--2i[ 77 g- il 1 Ca7/Z4.--<" g° C g de2i -ilL 56 , /62. -7190,,,_
v
. _-1 ,151-14- If/ ,,./vimadV/Let,K.e,i,;_, 3c).( • tpi,
A_4q... / / -- id--,-z,, v__ ( ,,,,./ /.14 ,,t, 7, ( , ) tk1 . .- t( ___5e) _ • ,
. . ,_.
. .
. ,
\ ,
L \). •
•_ Date Name _ Address 9
I/2- / 17 4,� �;� i . , 7/c--..t .. y .5'
1, 14,- 7.7 A-A,0--- ?ea-4' /3,-/ ,--1`71 >i- ,
-x7 4 9/77 ..1-.-j- 7) .g ,Z1.4417124A0-- dS.Q:i., '
F-- -2 V -. 7 4 &O G �a 2Y /vim rS-r) '': ',
52-`)(I- 2 7 Wta - /4',X(> - ' 4/,,2)/6Ze, ',•-.' -4 ?-/-6/
-ricer . 4.47a.,..-
'-a - 77 51'7 f -
-014l 71 . A. , - Xo R -4
1_:_--,av_--__L__-`7? `?-izety ,-,,,e 7i) // 6€1-Pit . .. --,
qf--- — '27 . ..'-' - _ .,_..._.(2 -, . e i -AY-7:1 08-e . ,
5- a(,( - 72 A! .�� 2 7.07 ,� C2,-, ,
e-- -i-f- - 7-I gra-c,-frp
.r- 9,9 ~ 12 // T . � 707 //4, a v
g—caAl- 22 ...ealittb ' - 4:-.9--ke2 701/ ifl: --i''*- it- o-e-2-d -V,L . '. :
?4 6 -7 0 `i116/ my y t.,, ac)e,
_s „
8- a5-'1 1 Le.ci...ban0) 0 a , et tm sn > 6myx,
e cZ 5- / .40 e nc_k Nailiti. ' �// le 0-0 ,
t � S- 77 ' At )` "kf laeurat, v silL.R.
Yes -7 7 At 76 9
e-45-77 4}1...,,m • 7/ _6;.A4, . , • .‘ .
Q - 7 7 .5, .�-c„—
f 7 77 ,, /3 6 2 v 1 c!. /f-6 f-4,44-7-77
cp....2.4;77_77 „..,....‘,_rt d ,,, ,,A.2. ..Zaet . 745- yel--"a„v at-6 S ,000;7,---4
t-'- .1'7 (4.,4a I 1 ,r,. .0.,
8-gat-971 1-U '5 O4 •- 1(6 41. aue_.
/-2, 7 7 l-v-r- -3.6,: h _Li.-1..4tie .i.)./.16::z./,I'f' i1.9 e?-6.; ::e ; ;2 J1'
U' i _ i-e': 'ie..14i
.S6 =77 ' a oo ze. :;
tfri
g .: '(,411 ,,,i' a. Chit, , Y 6/04•Ii..__4' i , . ':.:- i-::.- :
)
, Date
Name Address
-717 . / • !..V-A
F- c7V-- 77 aeuvu 'WM,11/40-t•s
-
9 -7 sr 4.TA
po(/ ,s 3 K.e_.:71\5Th
Rb S . Aurbiti.
77 _7 ,e_c_c_1•2,c) /46 y .14(.1-6e)e-i)
2:---(/ 7 62e-7. -KC,
4,. /.L_.; -z‘ 2
/
gi 2Y I 77 , °
/s2g_6
Dc1O /0-05 4o d4,77z(D-L
13e z ? AV.
/76 4,1d."411 /;-6 7,Y6 3 s_el
7 7
2 S---7") s 0:
(L.,A (0 62-cLij S PIA
. .
V .
_ :.•
, .
ffnEb 2?
AUG 26 19t t , .
" , 44, • . •
4/4 •
G • •
. •
. .
November 21 , 1977
To : The Honorable Charles Delaurenti,-Mayor and
Members of the Renton City Council
From: The Renton Hill Community Association
Dear Mayor and City Council Members;
I have prepared this information for your use this
evening to serve as a guideline for our presentation to _
you. Included is a copy of my opening statement and a
listing of the concerns of the residents of Renton Hill.
This information is not meant to provide conclusions but only
to share with you the many factors we have defined and taken
into consideration in deciding what our position should be.
We concur completely in the Planning Commission' s
recommendation and ask that you accept it in its entirety.
They have spent many hours of study and debate on the problems
of Renton Hill and have arrived at a solution we can live
with.
We are willing to provide any other information you
might require to help in your decision-making process. My
phone number is given below for your convenience.
Sincerely,
J
Kathy Keolker, President
Renton Hill Community Association
532 Cedar Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
255-0936
November 1$, 1977 �7 d ~-v'z4 w_ I ,,I-1- )
1\\')/\
PETITION: Protesting Rezoning Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington
TO: Mayor Charles Delaurenti
Renton City Council
Planning Commission Members
cc : �e
petition�
is in protest of rezoning Mill A'ue South, Renton,
Washington, from R-3 Multi-Family Residence to R-1 Single-Family
Residence.
We have been zoned R-3 Multi-Family Residence since mid 1964 and
wish to stay the same to protect the value of our property.
NAME ADDRESS
A.Ce_ e..1_4.2242/ Jr0 0 )q-e:ei ail 43 /ig il(fL, WI<
a2a- 4,cezt Q/0 5a d u 6(f j /e , @,4,
-,A 2-)/2) ) ,,,,,Q• 2-/ Airoyi-1,0--e/n2 3 3 6) ?-irie--q6)-e,Q. zL'iE
e_z ,,,,,, ..., (` ,,4,_ .,.., 3 /:u a a.,-�. ,,e-,v im
, ,,,
(.__,-,11..„,c),_. drc /. .-s !f .mac tiC-c 6 -kl_ S ,,L,✓LccE '
C'L"-/-e- * ---._.//cle.-e. -,----eee-i - 6-I a- -A/a/ av‘e Yo 6-7.4_4_,- .
0-y74;4; V,44, 4) ,5--7 o 7__,_.. .' i,,e..,-rf- .6,41-4
vck_.-yvc,__) -in UJulp-Alf bq Cp 101 (JJ, eliu e .. 1 ( 1,10-,
C\ - ry?J) K. li � 1�1 3 Ci y-n �.e es,u 1� �c�
)P//al- X/ I ,
‘16(4 7/-/---i //, z.( Re-ir 47(2 5 7t ,_ij;,_)
. ; ,
r'Z-A-:- 4,/e 4 L L 7�__ - ---- .3 -) /y7 /7 rec' - - { ,2 /��
.2 i ^ �- , :2,./17 Ct t;' /c(',//,
: _—_,Z,_." --: . /_,r__, 7,z z -
XeitiLe440E ; - VO 6 LM, a a-e-ke-4 61/0-(--)
/� //
, !,i
k(/()-(1 tee, ( - i��
/ ateJ i
, .
. . .
.,
- 41ovomber 13,.. 1977 . . ) - a
f,L,TITIoA: a.$)jislattuL,; tiE42p.ltp_r111_11 Avenue South Renton klashin7ton '
/ TO: Mayor Charles ,Delaurenti
Renton City Council , H
22211111.11ELLMaiss12-_-- 12. 20Pol's
. — e.....
This petition is in protest of rezoning nill Avenue South, Renton, ' •
aashington, from R.-3 Ilulti-Family Residence to R-1 Single-Family
i%esidenee.
• V.,e have been zoned ii-3 ilulti-ramily iesi6once since mid 1964 cad
wish. to stv_ the same to •,)rotect the value of our )ronerla:__________
. ADLESS
• .
Ha 4" /c__4-e
' .• .
.91',3 ? ---mz,.// 71i4,0,:_,A git/o-
. . '
. , .
.ed,zaly ...• - 50 '1-1(1,,(Le A vE.
. .
,AA.11 0 i
, .
c}c-'?•--;---r°C2 /OAr---eL-qh-z-C-• S-Cf2-0 ---?-kz-c-e-, S& /C-e4J-ex-7----- /L)
e. .)-2-z-e . • iete_eue.
• re 0 0 c-Y)-Z-J"--4 4-4 1°-C -'1-e”
• C)--Pi crt t... 0
fi-c-al-e}i)
in
1 , . ---), /--EL il
t..4. / . ' -e_e__,6-?..-• - •
17.te /l1,
. . .
. .
. .
. •. . •
•. .
. . .
. , . •
. •
. .
. .
. •. .
. .. .
. .
• •
• ' .
. . .
. ,
, .
. . .•
. .
. .
. ..
. .
, .. . .
• : . • .
. .. .
• .
. -
• ,
. .
. . .
•
THE CITY OF RENTON
V `� MUNI,CIPAL BUILDING. 200 MILL AVE SO: RENTON,WASH. 98055..
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR a DELORES A. MEAD •
CITY CLERK
glFp`" �.. ei`.:. October 27, 1977
SEP
Gouge McBeth' and Faull
505;-B .South Third S.treet :,
Renton, "Mat Washington '98055
Attention ��Ir.:., Robert, E. McB:eth
; 'Dear,Mr. .'McBetli:..
The Renton: City Counci 1 at :i.ts. regular meeting of October 24, 1977
referred your letter of October. 13.,. 1977 re Renton Hill - Rezone Request
'Swith Legal, Memorandum to: the; Planning:and .'Development Committee until
-. .the -t,ime of ..the publi:c`'hear-ing on this matter, November 21 ,. 1977.
{. Per.::George Perry i s: Chairman of. the P,l anning `and Development Cor hll ttee
and.,can,.be contacted' 'by phone 235-258'3. If.you have further questions
p,l ease" 'contact'this office."
i- .
- Yours very truly,
CITY OF RENTON •
Delores A: . Mead,
. . City Clerk
! _.
Affidavit of Publication .
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ss. ,
ti 'a k• 7,J Ti b CJ UI.iJ � '.,•4• r.
T'•, 4 being first duly sworn on i .v ,
t3�@ �4;x'k (ITYI 'RENTON,
oath,deposes and says that s he is the of NOTICE i ':.j''.
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) �, UBLIC H ARINO
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and I ` '
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred RElyd c:niJ i t!?i COI)IVCIL
to,printed and published in the English language continually as a news- NOTICE:.IS, HEREBYI GIVEN'thaf the'Renton City
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, I
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained . Council-tis-died'the 21st
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton �•day of Nomember 1977, at
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the i 8:00 pm' i`ri' the.'Council
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Chanters::of tthe:- Renton
Municiipal BuildingkRenton,W ','
Washington.That the annexed is a "O t i C O of Public
place inig pu iIc e'�irrie ntl',
place;fog a pubioh%ari,spo j •
considerthe following.:,t.,;
HC S,�' r ` '.-C;O`'M,F4R'E;H N�Sp,, ..r s
PLAN,•;:RENTON HILL )
PLANNlNG`4,;4REp ,i
(THAT AREA-GENER,r
as it was not in supplement form of said newspaper) one a each issue for a period ALLY'.BOUNDs`BY,FAI°".^�;
405 :ON THE'wESTr ,
CEDAR RIVER,(ONTHE:,,,
NORTH.'THE HILL&SIDE •',
of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the 'AND;-:t)f DEVELOP Di 1
AREA;ON7.THE.EAST: a
.ANDHE`POWERLINE ;
41 `�C�C3� '3�
day of ,19 77 ,and ending the : T
: RI'GH6T,,,OF WAC7' oc
T.HE SOUTH)` .- , '
any and pll Interested( ;
sons,are invited (r,, ;:'
day of ,19 ,both dates sent�to&voice approval M'
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- �'' '; i
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee s same.
ofr •;;;;*.,,
same � •;,� Ny�� '�'a
CITY'OF RENTON�
charged for the foregoing Z. a ! 1 ,, _ Delores A.Mead-;'
has beenpaid in full at the rte of publicationeis the sum of $ , which , )* "'., City Clerk
per folio of one hundred words for the
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent >'+ .mot''••insertion. ;
,,
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21 day of
... ;c.t.obe.r , 19.7.7..
gg.a.-c--ger.Notary Pu an or the State of Washi ,
residing at Kent, King C .
—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June •
9th, 1955.
—Western Union.Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State. ,
V.P.C.Form No.87
!/ r1 o
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING ss.
•
Me 'p,i• '•E; Hex'beuah being first duly sworn on j .N?_;,; ` ' a
I 3; lr
oath,deposes and says that.S.h?..isthe Ctli?f Clerk of i.. . ,1.
cmyt, lP RENTON
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) . $•?i: :'NOTICE @i ,. •'
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and 1"W PUBLIC i Il
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred •,. f ! ' �`"'
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- .'RENTON CITY COUNCIL ,
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, a NO'RI'CE;,IS'r`HEREBY
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained 'GIVEN°that the Renton eV*
'
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton CbUnciiNha i s fixed .g1�
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the ,day of November, 1977E[I3'I
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 1 g 00 p: m the Council,
Chambers the Renton
Washington.That the annexed is a NO t 1.C C of Public ,hlugtoi,04e(BuUdings tone
• �.t�n`aS thEJ i
place( L'•IIpublic '-to'
Hearing ,consider, he follow
GIO M P,RtE1,H,ES$DI ,E
PLAN`•,.RENTON ktl41.
f,,-
as it was published in regular issues(and P L A'NyN IpN G. A PIE A•
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period (THATdtARE G4' HER-
ALLY BOU�'ND,BY;FAI-
4054ION =.T E WEST,
CEDAR^RER ON Tilt-
of 3. consecutive issues,commencing on the NORTH.7HE-, • --iE+
AND'sUND VETt3PE !
2.1 day of October ,19.1 7 ,'and endin the ' AREA` ON;rat 'W`EE_A;5$f�t
g AND:THE;ROWE ,,iN ,
RIG'HT-OF-W. , NI,
THE`SOUTH). • '•
An and all in erested.-
day of ,19 ,both dates sons are Bn1 •I CD ID pa,
inclusive,inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- sen[to:Voice;a royal .
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee approval,Clk3�;
approval Irp opinions m•>
' s ame a ' .• 'g•'
'
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $16. which CITY CIR RENTON'
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the fDelore_s'1 1i s,
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent ,, ' L. '
insertion. •k'
Chief C • • _3 .i ,,
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2.1 day of
...October , 19.7.7..
fi
Notary Pub i n and for the State of Wash' gton,
residing at Kent, King ounty.
—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June
9th, 1955.
—Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,.
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
N
V.P.C.Form No.87
} /fir„ M//
Renton City Council r `2c i`, /4✓c)
6/6/77 Page 3
Consent Agenda - Continued
Energy Director. Other members : Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner,
Conservation and Clark Petersen, Library Director. Committee will coordinate
Committee the City's energy conservation measures. Information.
appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti reappointed Mrs. Joan A. Walker, 1433
)tanning Monterey Ave. NE, to three-year term on the Planning Commission
:omission effective 7/1/77 through 6/30/80, having served on the Commission
since 1975 and presently Vice Chairman. Refer to the Wgys and Means
Committee.
appointment Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointted Peter Banks additional
Judge Pro tem Municipal Court Judge Pro tem. The letter explained Mr. Banks is
with law firm of Hardwick and Conrad, Evergreen Building; appointment .
effective th►'ough 12/31/77. Refer to Ways and Means Committee.
;onsent Agenda MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA AS
\pproval PRESENTED. CARRIED.
:ORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
,enior Citizen Letter from Leland Pumel , Chairman, Senior Citizens Planning Committee
:enter informed Council of motion passed unanimously at their 5/16/77 meeting
recommending that the Mayor and City Council pass a $600,000 limited
• general obligation bond to complete the senior center. MOVED BY PERRY,
SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER COMMUNICATION TO THE COMMUNITY
SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
'istrict Court Letter from Mayor Delaurenti requested Committee of the Whole agenda
ease of 6/9/77 include presentation by Del Bennett on lease negotiations
with the County for District Court space; lease agreement must be
executed by 6/30/77. Presentation to include proposed allocation
of space for Municipal Court. Moved by Perry, Second Clymer, Council
refer communication to the Public Services Committee for review and
recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN REQUEST OF MAYOR'S OFFICE AND REFER TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE
WHOLE. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: THORPE, SHINPOCH, BRUCE; 3-NO: PERRY,
STREDICKE, CLYMER. MAYOR DELAURENTI VOTED AYE AND BROKE TIE VOTE,
MOTION CARRIED
atecomer's Letter from William L. McLaughlin, Jr. , 10630 SE 176th, Renton,
greement requested a latecomer' s agreement for a water line he is installing
ater line in the Kennydale area , noting the plan filed with Water Department, No.
W-463. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST
TO THE PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
enton Hill A petition bearing 63 .signatures of residents of Renton Hill , mainly
edar Ave S. Cedar Ave. S. requested rezone of Cedar Ave. S. in its entirety for
equests single family dwellings , except those multi-family units currently
ingle Family in existence, based on reasons : (1 ) Traffic pattern accessibility,
oning street width and parking not adequate; (2) Do not wish to forfeit
views by allowing apartments to locate in neighborhood; all residents
taking pride in homes and having gone to considerable expense in both
time and money to improve older homes. The letter noted the neighbor-
hood is a quiet place to live and intent to keep it that way. Moved
by Perry, Second Stredicke, Council refer communication to the Planning
Commission for review and recommendation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY
SHINPOCH, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER REQUEST FOR SINGLE FAMILY ZONING
ON RENTON HILL TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND HEARING EXAMINER, :CARRIED.
dvance Refunding Letter from Mayor Delaurenti . attached letter from City's investment
ater & Sewer consultants, Seattle-Northwest Securities Corp. signed by Richard T.
onds Kennedy, Vice President, concerning recommendations for advance refund-
ing of $2,950,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, 1976. The
Mayor's letter concurred with Mr. Kennedy' s recommendations and noted
Kennedy would meet with the Ways and Means Committee 6/6/77 at 7:00 p.m.
Mr. Kennedy' s letter attached schedule of existing debt service and
proposed refun-1inn issime and savinas . noting meeting with Public Works
Gonnason and Deputy Finance Director Bennett and the Finance Director,
• Gwen Marshall . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN RECOMMENDATION AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Mr. Kennedy, City' s investment consultant, was introduced.
411
. 1
.
January,4, 1978
Transcript of Council Minutes of November 21 , +•1977 C in/ ; '- ; ;.. i)--1;<' F' ` •- s`
which inv the-s"the Comprehensive
Mayor Delaurenti : We will proceed to the Public Hearing 0 ;the Renton>Hi'l'T "area. Pla
Mr. Ericksen, do you have a presentation you would like to ke?(Response not audible)
Mayor Delaurenti : Do you have any correspondenceto read, Mr's. Mead.
Delores Mead, City Clerk: Yes I do, Mr. Mayor. Clerk read Planning Commission
recommendation dated October 14, 1977 (Exhibit "A"L and letter from Kathy Keolker,
President, Renton Hill Community' Association dtd. November 21 , 1977 (Exhibit "B") .
The clerk then read into the record a :petition bearing 164 signatures of residents
on Renton Hill (Exhibit "C") and petition dated November 18, 1977 bearing 28
signatures (Exhibit "D") . Clerk read Letter from Shidler, McBroom, Gates & Baldwin,
Law Offices, dated November 21 , 1977 (Exhibit "E") . That concludes the correspondence`
Mayor Delaurenti : Mr. Ericksenr 1.�:,� Lk- y C �`t`0(2- 67 D NI0(-t) 0 -�.
G. Ericksen: Mr. Mayor, initially_ J I would like to point out _the fact that this is
711,4,,,,,,-
a hearing on the Comprehensive Plan, ' t is not a consideration. on zoning® I-
6 - important 4.,.
this particularly/beaause-4,l.aaea �'7the error 'of zoning has been brought into the
' )
' correspondence that has been presented this evening,a+rm6y. I think that the
recommendation of the Planning Commission is related to the Comprehensive Plan,
the land use element of the plan, the circulation element and the community
Wi L:L,-
facilities element and these are the subjects which I rao address this evening.
I would like to point out for members of the audience the report available on
the front table here, the small 82 x 11 epor which is the report of the Planning
Commissiontialso to the Commission ' self, and these are available for anyone who
would like to receive a copy., This is the Comprehensive Plan now, it's' very small4;,„
1f15
' scale and t difficult to see, however, it does explain what the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan is/ on the front,and further)what the designations .are on the backl_.7.4,(-
I refer to these simply because of the fact we'11•,..be,tal_k.i.n abou:E.._thes,.e..t.hi,s.,-..,:.-} .. - •
.;.G:'ry. :?« v . :r /eJ:tL+'C..' Cf."ram: Cl.+'-,.e.47.•" c.i ,
evening and I think it would help clarify`" --Y°''�° '''' - `-.-' -'delig'rai;ioily" The�'' 1anni`n"9--1,,
' ; L. err.. . :.
Commission, in its report,land' the Comprehensive_ Plan Committee's report to the
'commi ssi ory dated . Y` , _ October 12th1 i ni ti al ly goes into the definition of the
Comprehensive Plan, its npur.pose,,_the elements of the plan and basically4the '
C�or..�mpre iensi ve 1 an �'as. yue 'define, ix, ,ci dental ly,_ i n the City of Renton ' '
C:. 4_._ y'. l:l 6�`�}f.."Le i'•'<,,,z.: d. ':{. `•+''.' h..`o`. r lam,t::f,;, t,.,=,; -.,; ,:, .i f)
ftrar' docu ents, as well as the �,omprehensi�ue p l an,..yy�map which is the large :map
designated '',,,Land3:4Use .?lanrI• p on the'front. Initially, the policy statement
. of the plan is4he dourent, •fu might note these documents were adopted in 1965.,
,
• There is a Land Illse element, a community Gcilities element and an 4rterial
Street elementr�plan. These basic documents relate to the' various items that I
/
will discuss this evening and I 5y. want point out that land use is only
AL-1 H S .
- 10 -
Anita The►land r; 512 Mill Ave. S. , Where are our kids going to live in the
W e bought of R-3 gat a higher price and want something for our future. ,,,t✓`MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE THE HEARING. L
er EUrf'"1
411
Shinpoch: I will speak against. Who owes .this propty�IjWas it recently sold, i
Farrell?` Now I understand that is not the case.,
Stredicke: It is an area with multiple ownership. We have list of 20 names
protesting on. Mill , all individual home owners. -f 4(/'
Bill Montagne: Transamerica ew11 proprty in f ;' contract to sell to Farrell .
a,��L..f ,f. 4�
. Mayor: Question on the Motion. MOTION CARRIED. (Time: 9:58 p.m.)
Stredicke: Don' t need five minutes now. Cannot find any substantial change to what
Planning Commission has recommended. Do feel that area near interstate should be
excluded from change as that is not going to affect traffic assuming City is going
to do more. Renton is only place you go north to go south. Do find one fault with
Gladding McBean property. Do not feel that property should remain light industrial
in 20 year plan.
STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT, ELIMINATING
EXTENSION OF MILL AVE. S. AND GRANT AVE. S. ,CHANGING DESIGNATION OF ALL OF RENTON
HILL FROM MULTI-FAMILY TO SINGLE-FAMILY WITH EXCEPTION OF MILL AVE. S. TO S. SEVENTH 5 r ,
AND � AREA WHICH IS OCCUPIED BY GLADDING McBEAN BE DESIGNATED AS RECREATIONAL.
MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. (Time:10:00 p.m. )
(Time 10:15 p.m. ) Mayor: . Meeting come to order and the Clerk call the Roll .
Clerk: Perry, Clymer, Bruce, Shinpoch, Stredicke, Thorpe: All Present
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THE MATTER OF RENTON HILL ZONING BE REFERRED TO
THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED.
Clymer: We have a lot of ordinances,from last week.
Perry: We have an ordinance on a moratorium set on building which is to be completed
oon and would like to introduce.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, THAT THE MATTER OF ORDINANCE AND MORATORIUM BE
REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.
Stredicke: First item on consent agenda deals with Rolling Hills and they are asking
about property south of that and I am wondering wether the Planning Commission have
reviewed and maybe we should put on 90 days or until Planning Commission completes
study.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, WITH PERMISSION OF SECOND WANT TO AMEND MOTION TO
INCLUDE LETTER FROM ROLLING HILLS HOME OWNERS AND THAT MORATORIUM BE INCLUDED IN
MOTION. AMENDMENT CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED.
- 9 -
Paul Von Beck, 18184 SEf4lst Place, Issaquah, recently purchases property on Mill
Ave. S. , a small 3, unit apartment and do not represent a large corporation. I rep-
resent a small land owner. I purchased this property on basis of R-3 and for an
investment. Does Renton Hill Community Club consider Mill 'Ave. S. as part of their
community? If so, why is Mill Ave. being asked to bear the brunt. It is our property
being changed, not the rest of property. Who will compensate the large land owner
or samll property O' er if this change goes through?
Stredicke: Asks Transamerica, Page 1 of report, engineer says his traffic count
agrees with that of city engineer b ecause it is not based on city information but
on professional information.
Pat: This traffic study was prepared by Joseph J. Millegan & Assoc. who counted
cars. City reports in back of folder and figures tally.
Stredicke: Why is comparison in study of Cedar and S. 5th rather than Cedar and
3 n,rk
. Why you went two blocks up the ,hill-0rather than counting at i,p tersection?
i( „„ . ,
tredicke: Mr. Farrell is not responsible for report.
4CKFarrell : It is my engineer.
" Pat: Can get you more information. Can get letter from them.
Farrell : This is where the City did their report and we did ours at the same
location.
Rober.t..McBeth, 1632 Lincoln Crt. SE, Rolling Hills, Attorney located 505 B S.3rd.
representing Renton Hill Community Association. Not trying to drag on hearing,
however,itAS.concern of the residents. Exhaustive study done in June 77. We agree
with recommendations of the Planning Commission and their study in depth. Their
recommendations are appropriate - spent five months to be 'acceptable.. I compliment
the Planning Commission, analysis made and recommendations.with both sides given an
opportunity. . We are not anti-growth; multiples are appropriate in certain places,
but not on Renton Hill . I am usually representing the developer. Wouldn't have taken
this case unless I felt strongly that the residents case is unique and have tried to
present reasons why it is different. Most input is about traffic and circulation
question. If this property developed to maximum, it could be 300. That should not
be allowed. Should be single family and not multiple, these things would be drastic-
i
ally affected. We didn' t in elude Mill Ave.. We have no feelings as it affects
Mill Ave. Traffic on Mill Ave. will not be affected. Streets are not wide enough.
Our concerns are traffic, crime, the neighborhood and quality of that neighborhood.
Our feeling is that this is not one of the areas that would be suitable for multiple
family.
- s - �� �..
People want to.move. to area and for the same reasons people want to live the-i-r-also.
Certain amount of discrimination = you are talking about economic discrimination.t
PatKParks, 118 N. 40th, Seattle, Attorney for Transamerica Developmen`}. Co.
W nt tof
I-'J-- Ifi-'. V I zt•" �,pt A4• rvr
talk about perspective in Comprehensive Plan. It was recommended. Pel`NNpfe on Mill ,�\,,J
�ti`
�A�vge. were in area of change. Lots of, di scussi on of Renton Hill and community. What
g.;._ C/ rL�?-)tentGfs ' ;G
' �!,e"r ,
' _r,..'4:21t 41,.. ct---(::�' O.- -4 ,ate 67�'I,,,,.,e de„,,„,„,..., �,// d rt;Ct ^1'es
1 4s.-.bee+ng p-i-npoi nted i-s-ane_•...s..ttr -Mi-l-arid few parts- of Cedar Ave. ned R-3. ``� _ecee. ,
`UJ14
co +Q., ome of area abuts freeway with very steep terrain and ideally suitedrfbr condo-
e ,,1�,(i3vt._C f„ .. ayi-_,,,t e (, ��4 1 � r-Ay,' . .,r.._-eve....t , f),w'`�•ei
mi n i um development j, this area is adi fferenttJ-- tile, ideal use/ is ,mill ti pl e fami/l,y: F Lots
."4./ ..E- c)-3 vivwe-,Pr k,.;,=,i.r7 avt s,- ,S 0,,,,, (!„')ZAr .,,,,t' ,4 ,l �• _g-GI s KI:-. ti-e-fn .,4 e.,?,q.
of people wouldn' t live on my client's property"- these areas are different from
other parts of Renton Hill ands p rty- lower than freeway in some cases. Would
say Renton Hill should be preserved as it is. Multi-family on my clients wouldn't
change. Cedar Ave. west should be rezoned to make what is going on there illegal .
Stredicke: You said single family homes are being used for apartments and city
should make it illegal .
Pat: Some part west of Cedar Ave. , some of Cedar Ave. is zoned R-1 . There are some
illegal multi-family. Rather than trying to change property, accept what is happen-
ing; make west side of Cedar Ave. S. multi-family.
Stredicke: Accept change that has occurred?
Pat Parks: See Page 12 of our response (Exhibit E) believe that is the worst house.
Banks aren't eager to lend money.
Stredicke: Is your appraisal public record?
Pat: Can't say, we have willing buyer.
Bill Montagne: Thought we should have outside source. Questionable if we would
get anything for that property because of property adjacent. Development would be
yso high, wouldn' t be marketable along freeway.
�Q,Qi ��E )Hansen: 336 Mill Ave. S. property owner, down zoning our property 9n Mjll from
ale-C1,6 ra..,r r,..1„et 4 e,t /Lt6%_r,_e,% ,t. it-E'�%Yrt:i� a 0--;-,-u. )1if
r
R-3 to R-1 would decrease property. Would not just leave the hill , but we have " / t)
paid taxes on the basis of R-3 and believe that proposed down zoning on Mill Ave.
is unjust."V t.1-.; ,me_. ,: � ; ' : ,7.s� -t n e*,--' n ,;•.:_ ,
ii,
Mario Gotti : 1005 High S. , was listening to Mr. Farrell talking about 90 unit apart-
ment and the other building. We are talktng about traffic; when we are talking about
200 to 400 more people going up that hill . Where are the people going to put their
cars if it is one way. What is this coming to:
Bill Montagne: Property we own we are selling to Mr. Farrell - those are the same
90 units on the south side of power line, along Cedar at end .of street, that was
Farrell 's 90 units.
- 7 -
with 90 unit condo it ?ld be.within defined limits. Look at Traffic Engineer
study. I am here rep eessenting Transameri.e ever pme rp. 'We feel we have been
citizen and part of community and really believe we are trying to be reasonable. Hope
Council will look at our side before you make decision about rezoning.
Stredicke, Second �e., Move we recess for five minutes. I`
Perry: HWant to speak against motion. We have a lot of people here and have study
by Planning Commission, Planning Commission had traffic study. Five minutes will
not give us time. We are going to have to accept Planning Commission report or review
matter.
Stredicke: I am not a product of fast reading. Want to see if it differs from Staff.
Perry: Wait until we have heard all the speakers and review material .
Stredicke: I withdraw the motion.
Gene Farrell : Developer and purchaser of the Transamerica property, 11112 Rainier
Ave. S. , Traffic study that was done was based upon City of Renton traffic report
and Engineers went into field to reverify. Some ,sort of_control possibly park on
one side only allowing two lanes. I .hay.e tab gtfestions03 acres of land and if I
was to concur in single family with four units per acre it would mean approximately
52 single family dwellings. The maximum condominiums would be 90. In opinion of
Public Works Director Gonnason and Planning Director Eric4en, haw much greater
effect from 52 single family vs. 85 cluster units. ••I4f 307dwellings h-'`that much .1:/5- .
baring, will have that much access., We have estimated cost off developing. Ourdo (I
612,e4Le...n a. x:.,.4.r"f fi,.;f 4;"A M ! 2t:i. r' �:' iY.,.F Ff 000 7 c
average cost i!s (not 1eji.ble) .
Perry: Point of Order. This is Comprehensive Plan we are considering, not zoning
or buildin . We can not excuse developer for gettinglo f the subject,-e -Comprehensive
Plan/ Reasons>on� for high •density -a�t Is best development f area.
n .L•FLLw•fi _ . min%('
-- Farrell : We are di'scussing'clul e: 1 that change is either/or /s, remains
R-3 or9-oes'to R-1 single family. I am trying to point out the feasibility develop-
ment-wise is similar. that problems being address have closeness. If single family
and platted/there is only 30 dwelling units difference between existing and proposed
66�_,/y
...Cost estimateswdown, this is question .of feasibility. Approximatecdevelopment C�
$9,000 per lot - this proposed plat $20,000 ; 52 families to invest.
4
Perry: We are getting oSthe Comprehensive Plan.ierb'v ,� ff. ,�` `" � y`` ��`� `" "<``
Farrell : My feeling is there are some problems that need direction to be practical
solutions. Think possible review of parking'and overall plan for approval ; based
on these we feel zoning does allow 400 to 500 on this property. We are not interested
in that - not that large. Statistics show 20 people, less traffic. 100% of problem
caused by 20% Of the people. They speak in terms of third generation and this is great.
- 6 -
Ethel Telban, 508 -Cedar Ave. S. , coal discovered on /lsRenton Hill in 1803 and they�
��_AL� �,vC
began Renton !,-��-rw .t -6;G%i'-f-e •'�lr`-'�""°�/fih'G[/C.C.1
/I ooal Co..;Co. ; 'later. became Renton Coop,, Built t at*4th and Main,
�7i .[fin'. 0-4411 .� f. �— _: h i f.f`,>. ^:< ' ;µl,� �j;ti..p5/
,,.. Fi rst,churchAWRenton Hill in 188 res$Otgri an rMi l(l' and Beacon. .e?:-f,
�,urn1 'Fc
1 at,No. 2 drawn up 7/.18% ji-ttrat-re a s: ones who drew up plat was engin er ,�4-1 ;
yq Ff. ;C t � ,�rR'� �_a „).. ; •• o� c c �Lair /a.c tick to
of first locomotive to be brougght into Renton,, first r i,lroad in WasgJigto nton
✓�.2 Y" �-{ �:._ �„� 4�•Ci°^,d„,.,.k�, ���""""eee3��- �b- G,£:<...u'a'i"� �`L�C'
✓&a- -�-.,L° -f..f -b•y�'l✓ - /:-Cs�- �7"a•�..'`ji',_� ua-D"N- :•;ii ..�,•, �,7... nf..—'------
2 Hill wa Jal l single family home with exception f- a-partmen '-on Mill Ave. On Cedar
- Ave. Walker house was remodeled into apprtmenq6t., Some illegal basements.,v-
4trina-4.- 0.12,44"‘ 4/-A t've--
economic thing. econd and third generation people have come back to live and some
iteatifjqo
never left - Very few absentee a4aers on the hill . It is a stable community and
this is how we would like to keep it.
Jim Breda, 1002 Grant Ave. S. , I amnember of the Renton Fire Dept. Last Tuesday night
about a dozen of us collected funding for our efforts. Feel gratified that people
support this. Spoke to Planning Commission. Feel strongly,- most important to
preserve the neighborhood - would
� �.�•"�� �a� �d6f�,,� °G `>>
const—ruction of mmulti_ y_ would� haVeonCpl/`/-et•e-/.=.-gym act, �/
G�Y -'�%"'-�., 'NL- ..r,o,�r l..,c`..Ci.J,G...�o.,l'l.0..G=L.....� :- ,.`„C., -`•".�4'." /l X Gi-
laon the communi t hi ch i s-cl se btt``'j,secluded an. faini ly.,ori ente being of all ages
/
and inc•;+,� ;Jhen ddressed the Planning Commission,1sioke to rumorslNhich came
from a variety of people, such as our community is Igthrssiive-fra,`deteriorating. It
is interesting why the Council Chambers are full - people n community care. Renton
Hill is important part of historical heritage of our community. Preservation of
Renton Hill is in fact preservation of historical heritage of Renton. Cedar Ave. -
when car going north and one south, you have conjestion. Lotsaof automobiles parked
that shouldn' t be there. Garages on the east side are too narrow. Large number of
multi-family would ruin character of our hill . When large money corporation is gone,
we will still be there.
Bell Montangne, Vice-President of Transamerica Development Co, We are large powerful
corporation; think Renton Hill is a beautiful area and compliment the way they keep
their homes and everyone should be proud. Want to explain our position. We own io
acres for over 10 years. When bought, bought from Puget Western and zoned R-3 and
charged multiple-family area prices. That was a long time ago and don't think the
situation has changed. We do have pending offer for-price is less than what we paid.
We are just trying to come out whole. We bought the property over 10 years ago and
never heard anything about changing Comprehensive Plan until we had offer for proper-
ty. We have freeway on one side, it is steep and north side existing multiple
along with powerline.- planned multiple or cluster use. We would have difficult time
putting single family on that. We would have to take a real look, might recommend
Council members review go into depth on traffic. We did have traffic engineer look
at the area there as you can see, he claims Cedar is operating at 50% of capacity and
- 5 -
Stredicke: On slides you indicate study area includes that area below location of
Glading McBean and Riviera .
Ericksen: Industrial area, will remain as shown Manuafacturing Park or Light
Industry.
Stredicke: What about 10 years from now? What about access?
Ericksen: In terms of existing facility? If it were phased out, and_frankly,
it was the conclusion of the committee that other potential uses exist for that
location. Basically it enters at Mill and Houser Way and access into same area.
Kathy Keolker, 532 Cedar Ave. S. ,(President Renton Hill Community Assoc. ) What
about rezone, there was second petition supporting the opposition to Multi-family�
on Renton Hill with over 250 signatures to date,/ The community group, �r(e ask your
help in solving, we are apposing apartment:.development on Renton Hill . We have
united. We value the good qualities of life in Renton and want growth for Renton
Hill to be single family residential . The members of the Renton Hill Community
Association have chosen me to represent them. Have spent weeks with the Planning
Commission and support their recommendations. There would be severe detrimental
impact with multi-family. Street width s not allow it. We have low crime rate.
(Rereads Exhibit B)
Claude Rogers, 420 Renton Ave. S. , I have be I owner on Renton Hill for 17
years and have one of the older homes built in 1911 . I want to talk about traffic
on the hill and the S�teSness of hill . With new condominiums built at south end of
hill , how are they going to get in and out of parking lot when snow comes. The City
of Renton Street Dept. has helped us every year being the*e early and sanding morning
and night; can't with cars on hill . In days gone by, pipe line was open to South.
Traffic on hill was very heavy.:, When pipe line was open 1 ,279 cars traveled west
Think its.a conspiracy against us. When there: is:lone train,:we..go three blocks to
get one block, but we put up with it. How would we handle this additional traffic?
Streets were wide enough. In 24 hour period, streets only used 50%, better no parking
on one side.
Ruth Larson, 714 High Ave. S. , lowest:cr.ime .;rate in Renton is on Renton Hill due to
geography and lack of access; we care for and about each other. .Any law breaker must
pass Police Dept. on his escape route. This exist would permit easy escape, increased
crime would require more police. School children are picked up and bussed to Bryn
Mawr ; children wait for bus at bottom of hill , middle and high school students walk.
J
In 1972 pipeline road open. I brought a nine-year old child up the hill after encoun-
ter. . . I: .do not mean to imply all people that would come 'into our area are::bad, but
we do want to protect our children and homes and preserve our neighborhood.
1P' f
i ght of way; owned by the Seattle Water Department, not a---publ-i-c-thoroughfare; . �,g
iaAL
AjVt—one time it--was: {In view of this, the oim ssion, incidental��ly here is/ the
�'� °� '�
� � al i di ty�of .the . .. . r„��'� �G�r p��.. _
Mill Ave. area, the question here!`is not the/land u e but the circulate 1 .'� �r.
proposed the circulation system here is still the adopted . . plan of the City of
.171
Renton, the closed Mill--extensio n Lake Youn , ..this is Grant Ave. S. , the original
planiNs based on additional, access totheivre .Looking atth saccess question, ,/
t-he--P+aitn*nr emmi-ss 'rer ti-oned ffeas i bi 1 i ty. Mill Ave. exten i n ;a d made , ,-
• .0 C.: �1 C, �_ ;.; �� rr °l/j r� t,�/ .� i� it!✓'z°�
�trecommendation-on--th-tg—S—;udy: This is the—area looking f-wom tie—south,'show.i'ng
44:,1. .f�� "'� � Ct.✓'a�+';[:':! ...-m.... et. �':n'2- ',C 6m /' "-!i'F o .
the characteristics/Chalet apartments,1't"1ls:....l.s.-area_o,..,p opose.c ...r ad The Planning
Commission, after looking at, t f.r"a i bi ki ty,. therefore44ia a recommendation zi;.
l �'r/pr�.L��C• Ci6l�•:.1�'L,[.C.G-t-�.,.--�-r�'� .L ,:�>!r;t,.:: 2< - -rt�!
Xlrr !� based(onhe tse characte i s i cs of t the existing Ar a Street an, Lan l se—ay .. {
with this'fI would like to go into specific recommendations of -the Commission. /
Page 7 of the Planning Commission recommendation based on its analysis of Land Use:.
1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill area, the committee
recommends that the Hill area north of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company
transmission right of way be designated as single family residential . 2. The
steep hillside areas, powerline rights of way and matural drainage courses be estab-
lished as greenbelt areas, in addition to those presently designated on the Comprehen-
sive Land Use Plan. . I might point out the power line rights of way pointed out are
outlined in grey on the large map and steep hillside area is between top of hill
and Interpace designated as greenbelt. In regard to the ciruclation: Oh, I ' ll
just read this: 1 . The land use designations as reflected in the existing Compre-
hensive Plan was based upon provision of additional access to the Renton Hill area
to the south and southeast. The extension of Mill Ave. S. is not physically feasible
and, therefore, it is recommended by the Committee that such designation on the
Arterial Street Plan be deleted. 2. Extensive input on the part of.the residents .
in the Hill area indicates the desire to continue the limited access to the Hill
(Third and Mill ) as it is presently constituted. The purpose of such limitation is
to enhance the amenities. of the Hill area as a residential community and preclude
through access. It is, therefore, further recommended that the proposed Grant Ave.
connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of access of the Hill . "
3. It is recognized that improved access will be necessary to serve the properties,
to the south and southeast of the Renton Hill area at such time as they are developed.
The intent of the Committee's recommendations is that such access be -proved from the
South.
- 3 -
to define the residential areas for more specific boundaries or other boundaries
somewhat related, although this plan does attempt to separate the usage noted
here, the dark brown area stands for high densitypp residential , light brown stands—
for medium. density and the very , light brown s�"tands for low densiW)tiliqi areas
in white are single family residential , green is the park site, and bl ue,ii-s-a—/1-- --
public facilities; quasi public facilities. Councilman Stredi cke: Did you say
the plan was revised before or after the public hearing? Mr. Erickson: It was
revised after a series of public hearings by the Planning Commission during 1967
5L. -� ,1 , Id 1 V-r.,_
and 1968. This is the Land Use map of the area somewhat difficult to read, this
is Interpace here, the freeway over here, basically the area is predominately
family
single/residential , there is some scattering of some multiple use along Mill Ave.
also one or two,duplexes .also located on• Cedar. This is the southerly portion
of that particular map, this is the powerline right-off-- �
wayI referred to 'Avid/the'
" park site Egain�,1A Adjacent to the park site is the school site
the tank site put up,by the Renton School District. I wanted to show this
particular�� �sl i�c ;_i is a map showing mineral resources parti cul arly the coal
deposits"�'-The R't ton H'll coal deposits are right over here, the pink is depleted
oi
deposit, nd he 1'u,ei s))potienti al J reserves or resources that ar - am.aa- e a i",:,
reserve of e.�a 7 xi st , accordin to geolOgi st and m'1ngbtpe pl e . mi gh represent
a1 p o t{eN t i a l s u qd-o f e rgy, ` ) ' c 6� �pt,4f-c--- c�i., 'Ark? _ z`-1 cam- Gi2T71,.`1"�
1 S h i n p o lti h a-5 afire�``' e,7ma.n,e d?GG •��_ ,, . -'- /' -- . / r" upt-� '
/4A, j"""' .-et let(�r'' a�tr� r4,�` e. ,3.- ''14,,,,- �Z-✓t ems' t 1 ' ``'
Ericksen: `tes, mined ,out area, and mine shaft i tether lid os ,,,grav,,e,,l 07,1. ',
-.„-:,, ,,,,:.--.;,,,:0„,.,.
sand,a-d t,,,. c , . . . . . ,� r"
s n-ti'stoneA. geo•l,ogi,cal�. condition. ` , '
v" ..r/ ., _ ;%• ` ; l • r.:' /.+ r<, b:,.r ,r�.i ''°f,�z' .6L,f.P'.E'�' s f..h, j! .fA
0( We 1-d- l i ke to- it w- a se4Yli s of sl i des�rs rovarng of the of dest areas i n Rentol _
some df oldest��� ,�.. t
homes, single familyand some muli-fami�vl�y� . "Here we have jchange. f �,k
N
/vIglder=tp newer homes, some remodeling. ' As is Trt the corner of 3rd and 'Renton.
711.E, x , ,ud.e.,:,,ezet el.,ram u �.-r 0.. 'sU Pvey 1 of the ,golf are refs-We tial
Up by the Phillip Arnold ParLk lookiW to the Soute have "some�%new4 �n *a 1
,/ / / t�c-�;o�n
11Z ,G°-"(. b .y,Q eL ...*•`0`�':...' al;• + f I ✓i-' c :I c•{1- ✓/ 4 - -- /l,r``:'':F -G` rfL
l if ,;,:.)' occuring and power,)l i ner/war Thunder Hill in the backbround,( d Ee s---to ,the hi l
v{s ,s'„ ` .r� u 11 ys i s t the''eas oa L pl /tvi' '`, t et, --:,t.,� 0,,,` yam.'y4.,,0
�'! Third es _ �. Y�, ,.,„.:nr, -� •�4„e are snowing •parking
`/ ' I 1�t`, d�� _ ,/ ! /• 6 11 ..L Q. Cl..�I„..1..:L.. ,.,'.,L�. C .•i.,rr: \--2' ,(:J. }`
o. ,/ , Y V 4`..
a scri-cs of, shots of existing conditions. t' J .
_ /�
�/ �i .. .mot G�
/�{t(.^'� �" � L-f. c)-^'' "�� € / � U� rt •' +'`.�'.L',� .A. .r.' ���.,Mt:(�j:.<:�:{=2{°�� C' G.'�.f,r, J Vt .t°' �f�.
_Stredi cke: Is this a� two way strut e ct--G� -C �'
:_)„,2
rcksen: Yes. This is a hot of Renton Ave. from Third, urther up its the same
0, O^d( l3etrt cars parking on street. Looking to the north, looking at the triangle inter-
/ section at Third and Renton. Then further up. again typical street !Oration.
Some of the graphic characteristics are the area at 7th. Wart—t-o—show the pipeline
•
- 2 •
-
-one
/aspect of the Comprehensive Plan that we will be discussing. The Hearing on the
first page of the Planning Committee report states the purposes of the Plan, I think it is
important to note. in particular -9/the purposes-of-mast public interestwe-can so that'
-n ke a democrati c determi nati on, to effect political and eeeftemi•e-al coordi-nat:i.on._and
to inject long range considerations into appropriate actions. The Commission, I mean
the Plan,is to serve as a guide and by its nature it is a general document, it repre-
sents the best reasonable concensus of opinion in:.terms of the prFce which the
to th -`onci l ,
Commission conducts hearings and then makes recommendations/ I again emphasize the
fact the Comprehensive plan is not zoning. The report from the Planning Commission
gives background information as to the process that may be conducted as.-f'a-r-as study
-
and analysis and& the)findi:ngs that were made as a result of the study matte-by the
Planning Commission committee] as- i L is broken down into land use again, circ:ul'a A
erg t�d(.x.:r•! Lg:..c.%
tion and community facilities. I might note also the Planning Commission decrdr d
4.41 '1<'tf"i-:".-rY
the natural systems and natural characteristics of the area . . . . . . . The. . . The Commission
C/fit A l . (1(t'f!,.i •
also made recommendations "` 'mo an same category, however, before I run .
•through those what i would like to do is present. some slides to bri nU�ip,�,lth .g
4p -the date onA °.basically the various considerations that were made and how the
Commission arrived at the recommendations. Anyone else who would like a copy of
mtkite cl r rho; c:t.{,^ YS1 F't Gi
' these reports noWi The area we areareilee41111,-,atainew is the Renton Hill area and I
want to define i to lt's.,,'„ mi sty aerial photo - east of the freeway ,down to the
c �E.
cco-e �f power line right-of-way) down here, nd over,: ap,l1proxi mately, i nto this vi ci n i ty> Thi s
!.'+ .: . ,-::5.,, ?.'•'.. r.''%,
is the study area as defined bbriij fie Planning Commissi U ke.O 'irs at, I) -•
mention thiss it is simply a slide of, the large map up on the board which is the
Land Use Plan which we will go intofaa little more detail later. I mention'the
���/ 1 ' arterial
alternates of the plan which - he policy statement, the/,l street plan, the
community •
/facility plan, and the land use plan. This- is -based on al ' report
that was prepared in 1965. At that time the 198 lean cwas€,. dopt� �.:ax��i ;t •198b -_ •
plan i ncl ude� u.ari ous elements I just mend onede o'i'ng _back,_" _ -"the -Communi tv__
• ./i,-G�it- tom., �L �/1 <'C '�'"�
facilities defines--the Ren ton Hi 11 area park site thier A I a communi
level park facility, neighborhood •park facility. 'Tins is the arterial street plan,
I want to particularly point out in this plan this is:. what is known as the Ml.l
Avenue Extension running into the Tiffany Park area and down into Cascade.- This :. ,v.= f
black line here is Grant Ave. and the
Mill Ave extension is a community collector, Grant Ave. is an arterial streets- ;:- -. .:'
.Cf.£•J,)cA..?. r!;"i^,. -"p. .:,f! : .r�,+ f ', .: tom'
• This is ,a blowup ,o.f that plan, I 'm pointing out in particular u ' s thearea:
ti. }:S,r.. .rt!•`d•'"" i'�"{. ;,:-'r.,<?. /4;+ % P...,'; _.3✓'. `"'r''Slf%:'• ,L,o I^L.?:4,�.:.;:{:,:�,'ai. bA'��' ,{�t„'.;,'r• .:er",-,.i '' d, k.' ,'.;
0,ixikgreen is the park site, the blue is the school site a•nd the red over her`e
the freeway. ),10 19.65,yf e�;found,certai nf' em probl s exi ted with the plan in terms of
interpreting i t -as itrc Iat-e - o4 �herlriatter's 44 d Father ways to handle t ,e
matter regarding the plan and so it wabasically this a '
}._ revised , was the revision
P. H. 11-21-77
of life in Renton and want growth for Renton Hill to be single
family residential. The members of the Renton Hill Community
Association have chosen me to represent them. Have scent weeks
with the Planning Commission and support their recommendations.
There would be severe detrimental impact with multi-family.
Street width does not allow it: . We have low crime rate. (Rereads
Exhibit B)
Claude Rogers, 420 Renton Avenue South, . I have been homeowner
on Renton Hill for 17 years and have one of the older homes built
in 1911. I'c;want to to talk about traffic.., on the hill and the
steepness of hill. With new condominiums built at south end of
hill, how are they going to get in and out of parking lot when
snow comes. The City of Renton Street Department has helped us
every year being there early and sanding morning and night: can' t
with cars on hill. In days gone by, pipe line was open to South.
Traffic on hill was very heavy. When pipe line was open 1, 279
cars traveled west, think its a conspiracy against us. When there
is one train, we go three blocks to get one block. but we put up
with it. How would we handle this additional traffic? Streets
were wide enough. In 24 hour period, streets only used 50%, better
no parking on one side.
Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue South; lowest crime rate in Renton is
on Renton Hill due to geopgraphy and lack of access: we care for
and about each other. Any law breaker must pass Police Department
on his e:sdtz.pe route. This exit would permit easy escaper
increased crime would require more police. School children and
picked up and bussed to Bryn Mawr; children wait for bus at bottom
of hill, middle and high school students walk. In 1972 pipeline
road opened. I brought a nine-year old child up the hill after
encounter. I do. n©t mean to imply all people that would come into
our are are bad, but we do want to protect our children and homes
P.H. 11-21-77
When I addressed the Planning Commission, I spoke to rumors which
came from a variety of people. such as our community is regressive,
deteriorating. It is interesting why the Council Chambers are ful l
people in community care. Renton Hill is important part of historical
heritage of our community. Preservation of Renton Hill is in
fact preservation of historical heritage of Renton. Cedar Avenue
when car going north and one south, you have conjestion. Lots of
automobiles parked that shouldn' t be there. Garages on the east
side are too narrow. Large number of multi-family would ruin character
of our hill. When large money corporation is gone, we will still
be there.
Bill Montangne, Vice-President of Rtransamerica Development Co„
We are large powerful corporation; think Renton Hill is a beautiful
area and compliment the way they keep their homes and everyone
0)
should be proud. Want to explain our position. We have owned :l-0-
acres for over��l'0 years. When bought, bought from Puget Western
and zoned R-3 and charged multiple-family area prices. That was
a long time ago and don' t think the situation has changed. We
do have pending offer for price is less than what we paid. We
are just tying to come out whole. We bought the property over 10--
years ago and never heard anything about changing Comprehensive
Plan until we had offer for property. We have freeway on one side,
it is steep and north side existing multiple along with powerline -
planned multiple or cluster use. We would have difficult time
putting single family on that. We would have to tlike a real look,
might recommend Council members =04ew go into review debth on
traffic. We did have traffice engineer look at the area there as
you can see, he claims Cedar is operating at 50% of capacity and
with 90 unit dondo it would be within defined limits. Look at
traffic engineer study. I ar here representing Transamerica
/ q!P. H. 11-21-77 '
t
Some of area abuts freeway with ve y steep terrain and is ideally
suited for condominium development. This is prime R-3 area, this
area is different - the ideal use is multiple family. Illegal
apartments were mentioned in R-l. There is multi-family on Mill
and Cedar West, so it should be made i.11egai- legal. Lots of people
wouldn' t live on malt client ' s property; theme areas are different
from obr parts of Renton Hill and probably lower than freeway
in some cases . Would say Renton Hill should be Werved as it is.
Multi-family on m7 clients wouldn' t. change . Cedar Avenue West
should be rezoned to make what is going on there illegal.
Stredicke: You said single family homes are being used for apartments
and city should make it illegal.
Pat : Some part west of Cedar Avenue, some of Cedar Avenue is zoned
R-1. There are some illegal multi-family. Rather than trying
to change property, accept what is happening; make west side of
Cedar Avenue South multi-family.
Stredicke: Accept change that has occurred?
Pat Parks : See Page 12 of our response (Exhibit 0 believe that
is the worst house. Banks aren' t eager to lend money.
Stredicke: Is your appraisal public record?
Pat: Can't say, we have willing buyer .
Bill Montagne: Thought we should have outside source . Questionable
if we would be so high,wouldn' t be marketable along freeway.
\C\ Alice--Hansen: 336 Mill Ave. S . property owner, down zoning our
property on Mill from R-3 to R-1 would decrease property,. ° Value
and not result in benefit to our property. Would not just leave
the hill, but we have paid taxes on the basis of R-3 and believe
that proposed down zoning on Mill Avenue is unjust and unfair to
property owners.
Mario Gotti : 1005 High South, was listening to Mr . Farrell talking -
(lb
P.H. 11-21-77
Perry: We have an ordinance on a moratorium set on buildin hich 47
is to be completed soon and would like to introduce.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, THAT THE MATTTER OF ORDINANCE
AND MORATORIUM BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO
EVALUATE AND REPORT BACT TO COUNCIL.
StredlitA1€40. First item on consent agenda deals with Rolling
044
Hills and they are asking about property south of that I am
. tfl.S? i')/a/1/1(.11.4
wondering *the( ' „c t., ,,, ,:ls7T5778, „ ,, . „,,, .
,4fiti'4'ilf\VM,...(':0,1 (31N tWi;TI: ,Ip'' ,:: )':,;'?. ::'- /**/ C)
MOVED BY STRt6I6k4— NdNI5if'dtMkrWITH°PeRAMISiO' OF -'S ata0
i
WANT TO AMEND MOTION TO INCLUDE LETTER FORM ROLLING HILLS
HOME OWNERS AND THAT MORATORIUM BE NNCLUDED IN MOTION.
AMENDMENT CARRIED, MOTION AS AMMENDED CARRIED. .
P.H. 11-21-77
Now I understand that is not the case .
Stredicke: It is an area with multiple ownership. We have a
list of 20 names protesting on Mill, all individual home owners.
Bill Montagne: Transamerica owns the property in fee and has
a contract to sell to Mr . Farrell.
Mayor : Question on the motion, to close the hearing: MOTION
CARRIED. (Time: 9:58 p.m. )
Stredicke: Don' t need five minutes now. Cannot find any
substantial change to what Planning Commission has recommended.
Do feel that area near interstate should be excluded from change
as that is not going to affect traffic assuming city is going
to do more. Renton is only place you go north to go south.
Do find one fault with Gladding McBean property. Do not feel
that property should remain light industrial in 20 year plan.
STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT, ELIMINATING EXTENSION OF MILL AVE. S. AND GRANT AVE. S.
CHAY+<<GING DESIGNATION OF ALL OF RENTON HILL FROM MULTI-FAMILY
TO SINGLE FAMILY WITH EXCEPTION OF MILL AVE. S. TO S. SEVENTH ST. ,
AND THE AREA WHICH IS OCCUPIED BY GLADDING McBEAN BE DESIGNATED
AS RECREATIONAL. MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED.
(Time: 10:00 p.m. )
(Time: 10:00 p.m. ) Mayor: Meeting come to order and clerk
call the roll.
Clerk: Perry, Clymer , Bruce, Shinpoch, Stredicke, Thorpe: All
Present. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER; _ THE..:MATTER OF
RENTON HILL ZONING BE REFERRED TO THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER.
CARRIED.
Clymer: We have a lot of ordinances from last week.
Perry: We have an ordinance on a moratorium set on building
P.H. 11-21-77
Farrell: It is my engineer .
Pat: Can get you more information. Can get letter from them.
Farrell: This is where the city did their report and we did ours
at the same location.
Robert McBeth, 1632 Loncoln Crt. SE, Rolling Hills , Attorney
located at 505 B S . 3rd representing Renton Hill Community
Association. Not trying to drag on hearing, with recommendations
of the Planning Commission and their study in debth. Their
recommendations are appropriate - spent five months to be acceptable.
I compliment the Planning Commission, analysis made and recommendations
with both sides given an opportunity. We are not anti-growth;
multiples are appropriate in certain places , but not on Renton Hill.
I am usually representing the developer . Wouldn' t have taken
this case unless I felt strongly that the residents case is unique
and have tried to present reasons why it is different , Most input
is about traffic and circulation question. If this property
developed to maximum, it could be 300 . That should not be allowed.
Should be single family and multiple, these things would be
drastically affected. We didn' t include Mill Avenue. We have
no feelings as if affects Mill Avenue. Traffic on Mill Avenue wilL
not be affected. Streets are not wide enough. Our concerns
are traffic , crime, the neighborhood and equality of that neighbor-
hood. Our feeling is that this is not one of the areas that
would be suitable for multiple family.
Anita Theilander , 512 Mill Avenue S . , Where are our kids going
to live in the future? We just bought additional lot R-3 , at a
higher price ans want something for our future.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE THE HEARING.
Spinpoch: I will speak against. Who owns this property, Farrell ro- Transamerica? Was it Recently sold?
1
Farrell? Now I understand that is not the case.
P .H. 11-21-77
Farrell: It is my engineer .
Pat : Can g you more information. Can get letter from them.
Farrell: This is where the city ,ft their report and we did ours at the
location.
Robert McBeth, 1632 Lincoln Crt . Se, Rolling Hills , Attorney located
505 B S . 3rd representing Renton Hill Community Association. Not
ing to drag on hearing, with recommendations of the Planning
Commission and their study in debth. Their recommendations are
appropriate - spent five months to be acceptable. I compliment
the Planning Commission, analysis made and recommendations with
both sides given an opportunity. We are not anti-growth; multiples
are appropriate in certain places , but not on Renton Hill. I am
usually representring the developer . Wouldn' t have taken this case
unless I felt strongly that the residents case is unique and have
tried to present reasons why it is different. Most input is about
traffic and circulation question. If this property developed to
maximum, it could be 300. That should not be allowed. Should be
single family and not multiple , these things would be drastically
affected. We didn't include Mill Aveenue. We have no feelings as
it affects Mill Avenue. Traffic on Mill Avenue will not be affected.
Streets are not wide enough. Our concerns are traffic, crime, the
neighborhood and equality of that neighborhood. r feeling is that this
is not one of the areas that would be suitable for multiple family.
Anita Theilander , 512 Mill Avenue S . , Where are our kids going to
live in the future? We just bought additional lot R-3 , at a higher
price and want something our future.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE THE HEARING.
Shinpoch: I will speak against. Who owns this property, Farrell
or Transamerica? Was it recently sold?
Farrell? Now I understand that is the case.
Stredicke: It is an area with multiple ownership. We leave-a—
Now I understand that is not the case.
Stredicke: It is an area with multiple ownership. We have a list
of 20 names protesting on Mill, all individual home owners .
Bill Montagne: Transamerica owns the property in fee and has
a contract to sell to Mr. Farrell.
Mayor : Question on the Motion, to close the hearing: MOTION
CARRIED. (Time: 9:58 p .m. )
STredicke; Don' t need five minutes now. Cannot find any substantial
change to what Planning Commission has recommended. Do feel that
area near interstate should be excluded from change as that is
not going to affect traffic assuming city is going to do more.
Renton is only place you go north to go south. Do find one fault
with Gladding McBean property. Do not feel that property should
remain light industrial in 20 year plan.
STREDICKE,SECOND THDRPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLL1NNING COMMISSION
REPORT, ELIMINATING EXTENSION OF MILL AVE S. AND GRNNT AVE. S. CHANGING
DESIGNATION AL ALL OF RENTON HILL FrIRM MULTI-FIMILY TO SINGLB FIMILY
WITH EX_ PTION OF MILL AVE. S. TO S. SEVENTH ST. , AND THE AREA
WHICH IS OCCUPIED BY GLADDING MCBEAN BE DESIGNATED AS RECREATIONAL.
MOTION CARRIED.
• MOVED BY STREDICCOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED.
•
(Time: 10. 00 p.m. \,. X* Time 10" 15 p.m.) Mayor : Meeting, come
to order and clerk call the roll.`
Clerk: Perry, Clymer , Bruce, Sinpoch, Stredicke, Thorpe: All Present,'
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, THE MATTER OF RENTON HILL
ZONGING BE REFERRED TO THE H USE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED a
Clymer : We have a lot of ordinances from last week.
Perry: We have an ordinance on a moratorium set on building •
which is to be completed soon and would like to .,,j ntrodt
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, THAT THE MATTER OF ORDIANCE AND
MORATORIUM BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTTEE TO EVALUATE
., ,
/ „,. ,,,,,,,,,
I
1ee2.4-4.
1%4441.4 57-- 74 . rne-e-e. 4
dttt L
42.." Xa ; (2I
e,..74— /,..,4e...,/
- /
: .
.1 ,fi4t,
• 41,4,-4., (24-4A,...,v;4- yts, "2-----allalt. --------1--.--- _—
..,
,t0,-,, A 6'
A.:-:-`, 4. i
4 ,e-/e:// ii .(''.at_e____eff._._. iff- -.4'214 ? 04.,.e.........4
_,' 1 '-'-'
fr-e2A..,
1.-•`#7.44,1.: ( 67.e,
1,;46424L441,44A--,,,C4,..... ) Xii:Ltt- .7,141644,-.-44 e") „14
,e--- 41:
, .
. „
•
- (...?_•-e,----5-•—C.- aq-,,-.,:a.,,e;,74,..,_,--c,,,-/h el „iv..( „ „,,,t,A„
-
.' . -; .:" E fr ,T 4', .1.-ir e ( /jeLefe.,t e e 9-4(t.-, 9,/ •
. 1 j IL f, /7 .' .. ,..,,,,,. _. ( k ._.i,•
i ' :% ,/,,,,, ..,-:..", -, f.3„1--. ,,..'-. ..,,t-,o. i
4 /,-
.__ ...
,i --.4,1,-.ib • •
.4, - 1
fisi --; e
,
xx2. 0-1,,ii- ii.L.-e._ n gel.1
I/...._
, ...,A-.4-1,- (1"a. . 11,--;fp ...cr :(;?..-.'!:,2•:,I:1'64s , -,-r:2-'•C?-t -j)-4,-
/-
/i.;?1-e-
y/ .
.4'.•.;-t-4 ,,/
ef ' ',- ""'-- ' _,, 1._1 ;4`...
1 tilit/•(: , ;-r::., .1.j,ii.t.:..-ki.'.. .,-;, ; - f"4(:. ,();-,,,,,, ,
-& /..-1./-4:....2._. - ,-
,• Aff./..?-41-M4A.:‘
. i
a. A.--i.' - - -
% .i.e,i , , 1 '). .,,47 . ,'''; , . ,,,,,,...9.0
-"Fk,,,e,41,-1%. i f°,.x&---"'!.t.,..,:-.e''';.'•Y )-r. ./;.n ' 1i-m-
'-'' 41
,g. 44':-rl.
'..... ' '.n. A'
141,14444C ' ' '. . ' tAt(14:-1.'el„ .' (
t.,-----.9 - '',,--v..
( ,
d„., y ,,,,A.,,,i,,,t, ...,...„....,,,,,,,,,,:,,e4..,' ,/, ,.,...,:„. ,,,..„.„4 ..,' ,,...,,Q.,"..„()
I
, -- - t- , , i 4 I/
,.... ,, , :,..,.,1, 4...,........,'!,,,,,-..- ,,.1-1,14.,..4_,-.".4...,., i),.
yv .-4, 1.,,,-2 „,,,,,,,,„ - ,A,......
?
(,):17271,e4//' / /I id
/0. 0,..., ,,,,,,„., ....‘. .446: ., tkr , (2. _4---.(1',,•(:-.C---' .,1' 4Y-1.'14(1-11)/(-,41/
-1,,,,ta',6
i,
.4.•
__,
• : -1 ,.i:40-1_,,„.4,, e-,-- ; - :.-44 -e.• p, 71,...,1' ci;_,.,, ,,, .,,4
•
.44 ..0,/,.. e,: '"7,•"e, ,P. . - " '''''' -
I/1A
7 k,`,,:',../ AV 4 P`,...•.,'•si,•
A‘ '
00.41.-dA4 j,,,r,,,.K,..— $4.0,4-,<A;*-,f1.1.,1i,•,•-,d•,--•-,i
,.,'.. '"-C4.
2:,,'S'efr(..;,-,'Ll../ -" ' •i'. •
e- ••li-- ,-..-;) i , , it/
f ''./ (,,,','4 :' .,-."--,,,A'' V _ .-..- •
' ..4>'''''.6' - iletik P ,....4 • -.4 , , .1,.•At ,t,... ' ,.... ,... ,. _
...
. /.9 p„ .k,,,,,,,,,...,,,,,,•- ,
•,' ,,,I,T ,_ ,c.:•:.- ;,..• - __, ...__ __, /1 :7 i I 4,, i ,1 ) 2-
1,40ifiu/ .,//r)- 44/— . 4 t Ir''''''t-,,•^11 '
• 1,t'
A Ai /0 /Col
'
-'
Ijill , (cr.'),4,e,./..e,„,1,4,--1..g.,.4A —„,..,,,,g-','ii.,,..„4,_,,,..e..-. • .
_...,..t.:„..„,..v.,12,,,,,,,,givim.e•r,-....-...,,,,,...,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,-.:04,s,
k 4,
- i ;
(
R
, ..0 - .:' .-c, ,,..-•,.,--1 , g,..„,k;.,-'t
..14..,... . v •, '
• V .,?. J.,- lit l• • , i - .0 iff A-4.-,4,,
leit',.;..,=e,•;:..e,„A.:,--. ,5'E.:- ,,-- c,- C-
4,
41. . .....,,, ,
/ ; C -4
It P , ...e. .4-;
,,, : .„, -- - ,--
y
(7e0 A .1/4'`4 •*
,
. /
. .
.. •
••
. .