No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-116 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITIOith (1,41a MICRt FI1ME 116 -3O 1! ., , \ ., _, Slw-,0-- PO4t- • �Rcyy tt- PLA I,11, - 50 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: That portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Wa. ,described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision; thence north 89-24-22 east along the northerly line there of 372.37 feet; thence south 1-10-21 east 534.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 1-10-21 east 498.16-feet, more or less, to the northerly line of primary state hiohway #2; thence westerly along said northerly line to the easterly line of the westerly 30 feet in width of said subdivi- sion; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning; thence north 89-24-22 east parallel with the northerly line of said subdivi- sion 340.37 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT road. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter " the pro- perty," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: EASEMENTS A. Owner hereby grantsam easement to use all of those portions of the Shopping Center designated as common areas, parking areas and drive- ways, for the benefit of a new owner., the Lessee, invitees, licensees, assigns, subtenants, and patrons in common with all other tenants of the Shopping Center. B. Owner hereby grants a non-exclusive easement to use portions of the Shopping Center as may be reasonably be required now or in the future for the installation, maintenance and repair of sewer, water, gas, electric and drainage utilities and related facilities. If any of the aforementioned utilities are supplied, installed or otherwise controlled by the owner, owner- grants the right to use coupled with its easement said utilities and related facilities; and owner covenants and agrees to maintain the utility lines in good condition and repair. C. In the event that other parties acquire fee title to the demised premises, the easements and right to use the utility lines and related facil- ities herein conveyed shall be perpetual . D. In the event fee title passes from the owner, the purchaser agrees to grant the identical rights granted as outlined in this agreement. MAINTENANCE OF PARKING AND COMMON AREAS Owner shall maintain and repair the entire parking and common areas. The obligation on the part of owner to maintain said parking and common areas in good condition and repair shall , without limiting the generality thereof, include the following: a. Maintaining the surfaces in a level , smooth and evenly covered condition with the type of surfacing material originally installed or of similar quality, use and durability; Page one of two \-) 4 t, b) Removing all papers, debris, snow, ice, filth and refuse and thoroughly sweeping the areas• to the extent reasonably necessary to keep said areas in a neat, clean and orderly condition; c) Placing, keeping in repair, and replacing any necessary appro- priate direction signs, markers and lines; and operating, keeping in re- pair and replacing when necessary such artificial lighting facilities as shall be reasonably required; d) Maintaining any perimeter walls in good condition and state of repair; e) Maintaining all landscaped areas, making such replacements of shrubs and other landscaping as is necessary and keeping said areas at all time adequately weeded, fertilized and watered. Page 2 / n dp •January 19, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION, , APPLICANT: Barber, Kloppenburg, Olds FILE NO. SH. PL. 116-80, (Sunset Square) E-117-80; SA-104-80, V-105-80 LOCATION: Vicinity of 1320 Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST;: The applicant requests site approval for a +25,325 square -'w foot neighborhood shopping center consisting of three buildings and associated parking with a variance request from the rear yard setback. Also sought is approval of a four-lot short plat together with an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to provide access easement to proposed Lot 2. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Ueariny Examiner Decision: Approval of short plat, site plan and access variance; Denial of setback variance. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received REPORT: by. the Examiner on December 24 , 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on December 30, 1980 at 9:18 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. ' Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Site Approval Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Approval Map with staff comments Exhibit #3: Short Plat Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #4: Short Plat Survey (2 sheets) The Examiner inquired if the applications apply to both the B-1 and R-3 zones. Mr. Blaylock advised that the short plat includes both zones, but the site approval application is limited to the commercial phases on Lots 1 , 2 and 3. Mr. Blaylock corrected Section L.4 of the report , deleting the word "required" from the line, Parking required: 147 stalls, and adding the word "provided". The Examiner noted that plans for Lot 4, zoned R-3, are still conceptual and since the ultimate use of that parcel , either professional or residential , is unknown, access into Lot 4 from Lots 1 and 2 would not be preferable. He also inquired regarding the number of parking 'spaces at the northeast corner of Building 2 and which lot they are proposed to serve. Mr. Blaylock deferred the inquiries to the applicant for response during subsequent testimony. The Examiner noted that the Traffic Engineering Division had not specified a traffic fee based upon anticipated vehicle trips. Mr. Blaylock clarified that requirements in the SEPA document included the fee; however, determination of the actual trip generation from the site has yet to be established by the Public Works Department. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Richard L. Kloppenburg 15404 N.E. 6th Place Bellevue, WA 98007 Sh. Pl . 116-80; SA-104-80 Page Two Mr. Kloppenburg advised that the requirement for a trip generation fee had been appealed to the Environmental Review Committee. The Examiner noted that if the matter were still pending, the Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) is not yet final and the hearing should be continued. Mr. Blaylock stated that although Mr. Kloppenburg had appealed the amount of the fee as well as the question of sewer capacity raised during environmental review, the decision was finalized through resolution of the sewer capacity matter by the City Council and :establishment of traffic fee amounts by the Public Works Department at a future date. Mr. Kloppenburg indicated his preference to continue with the public hearing and postpone resolution of the assessment of traffic fees to a later date, although he noted that no precedent or ordinance exists in the City of Renton for such requirements. The Examiner clarified that the Traffic Engineering Division had determined the amount of the fee to be approximately $60,000 in calculating trip generation from proposals on Lots 1 , 2 and 3, noting that the authority of the Examiner extends to imposition of the fee during his review of the short plat. The Examiner reviewed his concerns regarding the proposed bank drive-in window access lane which intrudes into a 15-foot buffer previously required in restrictive covenants ; he also stated concerns regarding the dual use of the window lane for access which could cause traffic congestion onto Sunset Boulevard N.E. Mr. Kloppenburg indicated a desire to respond to the Examiner's concerns with the exception of the traffic generation fee. He advised that the proposed bank facility can be redesigned to accommodate access solutions including shifting the building nine feet further west. However, he felt that the entrance from Sunset is an appropriate location for the proposal . The Examiner reiterated his previous inquiry regarding the number of proposed parking spaces at the northeast corner of Building 2. Mr. Kloppenburg advised that four parking spaces proposed in that location could be eliminated and the parking requirement for the site would still be met. He discussed the applicant's intent to develop the entire property including both B-1 and R-3 zones concurrently and provide landscape buffers on the eastern and northern boundary. He indicated that the proposed easement between Buildings 1 and 2 would provide more efficient traffic flow to serve the occupants in the rear of Building 2. The Examiner requested further testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Scott Shanks, Architect 4215 198th Street S.W. Lynnwood, WA 98036 Mr. Shanks discussed access limitations on the subject site and the rationale in providing access to the bank building pad in its current location. He noted that although maximum development has been shown on Lot 3, the probability exists that in lieu of a commercial banking institution, a savings and loan bank would be placed on the site which would reduce the requirement for stacking lanes. He indicated that the city's requirements can be met and the required 15-foot landscape buffer provided on the eastern property line. The Examiner inquired if construction of all three buildings would occur concurrently. Mr.. Shanks responded that the developer desires simultaneous development or complete development within the same year; however, construction scheduling and availability of financing may impact development timing. The Examiner requested further testimony in support of the application. Responding was: George Barber 626 N.W. Lofall Road Poulsbo, WA 98370 Mr. Barber, developer of small shopping centers in the Northwest, advised :that..much time and effort had been expended over the past six months in completing various designs for the Sunset Square Shopping' Center' to provide a comingling of commercial and residential uses which are complementary to each other. He indicated that although he is familiar with all aspects of shopping center development, he is unfamiliar with the previously discussed traffic generation fee, particularly when all improvements are already installed. There was no response to the Examiner's request for further testimony in support or opposition to the application. Due to the need for clarification of the finality of the environmental determination, the Examiner continued the hearing for a period of one week to allow receipt of written reports from city officials regarding the DNS. He noted that the reports would be forwarded to the applicant upon receipt, and the Examiner's Report issued within the following 14 days. Since there was no objection, the hearing regarding File No. SA-104-80, V-105-80, Short Plat 116-80 and E-117-80 was closed by the Examiner at 10:05 a.m. Sh. Pl . 116-80, SA-104-80 Page Three FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a +3.4 'acre, four-lot plat, together with a variance to provide access via an easement, and a site approval for proposed shopping center on three of the proposed lots, together with a variance for the required rear yard setbacks. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance, and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the site approval by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official , and the short plat has been determined exempt from the threshold determination by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . The hearing was continued for one week to clarify the ERC determination. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The Public Works Department has determined that sewer capacity is available for the subject proposal . 6. The subject site is located on the northeast corner of Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. The site was annexed into the city in 1969 by Ordinance No. 2472 at which time the property was zoned G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) . The site was rezoned to B-1 (Business/Commercial ) and R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) by Ordinance No. 3420 in May of 1980. Restrictive Covenants were executed which required buffers along the north and east property lines and preservation of Honey Creek. 7. Pursuant to Section 9-1105, the applicant proposes subdividing the subject property into four lots. Proposed Lots 1 , 2 and 3 comprise that portion of the subject property zoned B-1 . Lot 4 is zoned R-3. Proposed Lot 1 , approximately 24,820 square feet, would have frontage along Union Avenue N.E. and is located in the westernmost portion of the subject property. Lot 2, .62,577.3 square feet, is located in the east central portion of the parcel and would have about 87 feet of frontage along Sunset Boulevard N.E. although the applicant proposes limited access via an easement (See below) . Lot 3 would front on Sunset Boulevard N.E. and would be 26,895.7 square feet. Lot 4, the parcel zoned R-3, would front on Union Avenue N.E. and is 34,021 .9 square feet. 8. The applicant has proposed to provide access to Lot 2 via an easement agreement over proposed Lots 1 and 3. _ A variance from the provisions of Section 9-1102(4) and 9-1108(23) (A) (9) which require frontage on and access to a public right-of-way has been applied for pursuant to Section 9-1109. 9. The applicant proposes developing a small , corner shopping center containing retail sales establishments, a restaurant and a bank with drive-in window. The complex would have a common traffic circulation pattern for the entire three lot complex and parking areas would be shared. 10. Sections 4-2203(14 4-2204(3) (A) (4) require that parking be located on the same lot as the principal use. The applicant has not applied for a special permit to permit deviation from this provision pursuant to Section 4-2204(C) which provides for auxilliary parking. 11 . The southern three lots, Lots 1 , 2, and 3, are zoned B-1 with restrictive covenants requiring a 15-foot landscape buffer on the east side adjacent to the R-2 (Duplex Residential ) zone. The covenants also require the preservation and incorporation of Honey Creek in the development plan. The northern lot, Lot 4, is zoned R-3. A 20-foot buffer is required by covenants to protect the adjacent G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) zone. 12. The applicant proposes constructing buildings on Lots 1 and 2 which would have rear yards of three to four feet and 13 to 14 feet, respectively. The Zoning• Code, Sections 4-711 (D) and 4-709A(D) , requires that B-1 zoned properties provide a rear yard equal to that of the abutting residential district . The abutting district is R-3, and therefore a rear yard of 20 feet is required. The applicant has requested a variance from the rear yard provisions pursuant to Section 4-722(G) . Sh. P1 . 110-80, SA-104-80 Page Four 13• The R-3 zoning category in effect for Lot 4 permits multifamily dwellings and, with a special permit subject to separate review, professional offices and clinics. The applicant 's conceptual plans indicate office uses for Lot 4. These plans were not submitted for review at this time. 14. Building 3 is proposed as a bank which would include a drive-in window. The proposed access for the drive-in window intrudes into the easterly 15 foot buffer required by covenant for a distance of 160 feet. The Police and Traffic Engineering Departments have indicated that due to anticipated demand, stacking of vehicles may interfere with travel on Sunset Boulevard N.E. which is a major, heavily traveled arterial , and therefore, they recommended that provisions be made for two stacking lanes which are each capable of stacking approximately nine vehicles. Section 4-2207 provides that drive-in facilities must be located such that traffic ways are not congested by the operation, traffic circulation within the facility is not obstructed, and that sufficient stacking space is provided. 15. Building 1 requires 20 parking spaces, Building 2 requires 97 parking spaces, and Building 3 requires 22 parking spaces. These numbers are based on the standard of 5.5 stalls per 1 ,000 square feet of leasable space for these types of concerns located within shopping centers (Section 4-2208) . 16. There are a number of new residential developments in the general vicinity including Forest Brook Condominiums just to the west. CONCLUSIONS: (Short Plat) 1 . The proposed short plat, as modified below to provide sufficient on-site parking to accommodate the proposed uses and with restrictions providing guaranteed access, • appears to serve the public use and interest. The applicant will be able to make use of this well -located property at the corner of major arterials, Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. The area is one in which expanding residential development must be met with increased commercial .growth. The small shopping center proposed will help serve that residential growth and at the same time expand the tax base of the city and allow the. utilization of the property for its highest and best use. 2. Each of the four lots has required frontage on a public right-of-way and each lot provides suitable area to allow the construction of a commercial building and reasonable landscaping to help promote the best interest of the community and contribute to the attractiveness and desirability of the community as a place to work, live and shop. 3• The applicant has submitted a site plan for review in addition to the short plat. That plan indicates the particular use proposed for Lots 1 , 2 and 3. The plan also indicates the parking requirements of the various uses and the proposed traffic circulation plan. The proposal merges the parking and circulation patterns into a common shopping center and avoids "unnecessary" curb cuts. For this reason, the applicant has proposed a "reciprocal cross easement" to serve the needs of the three properties and tie them together as a functional shopping center. 4. Section 4-2204(3) (A) (4) requires that parking be provided on the same lot as the principal use, which in turn requires that Lot 1 provide 20 parking spaces, Lot 2 provide 97 parking spaces, and Lot 3 provide 22 parking stalls. While the parking, so required, may not have to be permanently allocated to a particular use or signed and segregated, nevertheless, sufficient parking to serve the intended use must be provided on site. 5. In order to provide the requisite number of stalls per lot the applicant may shift the property lines as indicated in the attached map. As indicated, the lot lines have been shifted to permit the appropriate number of stalls per lot and per the proposed use. The applicant may adopt a similar plan. (Variance for Access) 6. The common circulation pattern was proposed to mitigate the impacts on the traffic flow of entering and exiting vehicles on both Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. This would be accomplished by decreasing the number of curb cuts and driveways. The applicant has requested a variance to the Subdivision Ordinance to permit access to Lot 2 to be via driveways and common roadways located on Lots 1 and 3. • Sh. Pl . 116-oo, SA-104-80 Page Five 3. The proposal would permit the three lots included in the joint access agreement, Lots 1 , .2 and 3, to provide for a reciprocal cross easement to accomplish the purpose. Included within the easement would be joint use of the parking space required. 4. The variance should be granted to permit the joint access proposal . The public welfare will not be harmed by the approval of the exception; as a matter of fact, the public safety will be benefited by an approval . The joint access will decrease the amount of frontage and landscaping sacrificed to curb cuts. It will also decrease the actual number of curb cuts, therefore mitigating the impact of the development generated traffic turning into and out of the subject property onto both Union Avenue N.E. and Sunset Boulevard N.E. 5. The proposed arrangement is similar to joint access provided in other shopping centers which also minimize the number of curb cuts. The approval of a variance involving access via joint driveways should not interfere with or injure other properties in the vicinity. The doubling of the stacking capacity of the drive in lanes should minimize the possible impact on properties to the east along Sunset (see site plan below) . 6. The location of the subject property at the major intersection of Union Avenue N.E. and Sunset Boulevard N.E. provides justification to approve the requested variance as being in the public welfare and substantially increasing the public welfare. Similar relief was approved for property located at the intersection of Rainier Avenue S. and S.E. Grady Way, also a major intersection. 7. The applicant has only the most rudimentary proposal for proposed Lot 4 which is zoned R-3. The lot as proposed provides independent access onto Union Avenue N.E. Since this lot is zoned for residential uses and is in an area designated for multiple family development, it would be inappropriate at this time to permit joint access with retail and other commercial ventures. The lot may serve solely residential development, and joint access of residential and commercial should be avoided. In order to develop commercial uses, a special permit must be approved and the appropriateness of such application is not now before the Hearing Examiner. (Site Plan) . 8: As previously indicated, the applicant proposes a small shopping center located on approximately 2.85 acres. The shopping center would consist of three buildings, each on a separate parcel and each providing parking as required in Conclusions No. 3, 4 and 5. Access would be via two driveways, one providing access via Sunset Boulevard N.E. and the other access via Union Avenue N.E. A reciprocal easement entered upon the face of the plat would permit such an arrangement and a variance for such an arrangement has been approved above. 9. The shopping center would be erected on Lots 1 , 2 and 3. The tenants, as proposed, would be a restaurant, a bank and certain currently unidentified retail shops. The applicant proposes establishing a drive-in window adjacent to the bank with an associated stacking lane. As proposed, the Police and Traffic Engineering Departments indicate that the proposal would not provide sufficient stacking space and have recommended that the stacking lanes be expanded to two such lanes, each capable of stacking nine automobiles. Because the stacking lanes enter via Sunset Boulevard N.E. , a major arterial , the applicant will have to increase the stacking lanes to the two recommended by the Traffic Engineering and Police Departments. Further, Section 4-2207 requires that driveways and traffic circulation generated by drive-in windows not impair the circulation pattern of the shopping center as a whole. The current plan may cause such impairment since the egress from the .drive-in window crosses the entry lane from Sunset and also uses the parking lot maneuvering area for an exit lane. The drive-in window should be designed so that the efficiency for which it is intended, quick banking, is not diminished and so that interference with the remaining traffic and business in the shopping center is minimized. Therefore, the entire proposal as to the location, entry driveway, stacking lanes and circulation patterns in the area surrounding the proposed bank must be reviewed and approved in writing by the Traffic Engineer. 10. Further, that portion of the plan which includes a drive-in window should be conditioned upon further review after the facility has been functioning in this location in order to determine whether, in fact , that functioning impairs both internal circulation and, most importantly, traffic flow adjacent to the subject property. Sh. P - 1 . 080, SA-104 80 Page Six If, subject to determination by the Police and Traffic Engineering Departments, the drive-in facility impairs either traffic flow or interfers with internal circulation, then the facility shall be terminated as incompatible with the public health, safety, and welfare and in violation of Section 4-2207. Any changes required shall be subject to a site review hearing before the Hearing Examiner. 11 . In addition to the above required changes , the applicant must preserve the buffer along the eastern property line as required by the restrictive covenants. That buffer is to be a '15-foot deep landscaped area and the landscaping for the buffer and all further landscaping must be approved by the city. The restrictions also apply to Honey Creek which flows along the southwest corner of the site, and the applicant must both preserve and protect the creek from development and incorporate it into landscaping plans subject to final approval of the city. (Variance for Setback) 12. The applicant does not suffer undue hardship, and therefore, the imposition of the normal requirements of the Zoning Code should not be varied. The B-I zone in which the applicant intends to develop the shopping center is located adjacent to an R-3 zone and it is therefore required to provide a rear yard of 20 feet on the B-1 properties. This yard would be located between Lot 4, which is. zoned R-3, and the northern property lines of Lots 1 and 2, which, along with the remainder of the shopping center, Lot 3, are zoned B-l . 13. The execution of restrictive covenants required a northern buffer between the low density uses north of the subject site and the higher intensity uses permissible in the R-3 property. Similarly, the R-3 zoning was imposed as a buffer between those northerly, single family uses and the B-1 zoned property at the corner of " Union Avenue N.E. and Sunset Boulevard N.E. The Zoning Code, as well as the Comprehensive Plan, generally recognizes the use of buffers between differing intensities of zoning classifications. The Zoning Code specifically requires setbacks and yards for development on B-I parcels when adjacent to residential zoning, whatever the proposed intensity. 14. Similarly, the applicant's proposed, conceptual and unapproved plan to construct offices on the R-3 zone is just that, unconfirmed and subject to change and subject to a separate special permit process. Also, the applicant's intended use is not a unique condition associated with the subject property.. Similarly situated B-1 zones have had to provide the necessary rear yard, and the applicant is not denied reasonable development rights by the general imposition of the standard setback requirements. DECISIONS: The short plat and access variance are approved subject to: 1 . The provision of adequate space on each lot of the requisite number of parking stalls pursuant to Section 4-2208. The attached map may serve as an example. 2. The inclusion on the face of the plat of the joint access, circulation and parking easements between and among Lots 1 , 2 and 3. 3. A separate and distinct access for proposed Lot 4. 4. Site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner of proposed development on Lot 4. 5. The location of all driveways is subject to approval by the Traffic Engineering Division. The site plan is approved subject to: 1 . Approval by the city of all landscaping plans including but not limited to the buffer adjacent to the eastern property line, all internal landscaping and the landscaping and preservation of Honey Creek. 2. Approval of the driveway and drive-in window stacking arrangement by both the Police Department and the Traffic Engineering Division; such stacking arrangement shall include but not be limited to two entry lanes and such other improvements as may be required by the Police Department and Traffic Engineering Division. If those departments determine that such drive-in windows cannot comply with the provisions of Section 4-2207, the drive-in window shall not be established. 3. Termination of the drive-in window if the Police Department and Traffic Engineering Sh. Pl . 116• —, SA-104-80 Page Seven Division determine that the window interferes with the flow of traffic on the public right-of-way or impairs the internal circulation of the shopping center pursuant to Sections 4-2207. 4. Any change in plans shall be subject to review by the Hearing Examiner. 5. No occupancy permit shall issue for any portion of the complex until all parking areas, access roadways and landscaping are installed and improved according to City of Renton standards. The variance is denied. ORDERED THIS 191h day of January, 1981 . Fred J . fman Land Use Baring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of January, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Richard L. Kloppenburg, 15404 N. E. 6th Place, Bellevue, WA 98007 Scott Shanks, 4215 198th St. S.W. , Lynnwood, WA 98036 George Barber, 626 N.W. Lofall Road, Poulsbo, WA 98370 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of January, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before February 2, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. . . 4,-,..:......-;_____....>•,.... . .. •• •-.: - ••••,... . BARBLI;, KLOPPLNBURG, & OLDS - .. .• -' 1 ' i r Its.: . .. SA-104-80 silo- -4 I ..,*.v. • .• • . . • SITE PLAN •_ - • -i c - ,.. ,-- -.:- - : - -- • .. ........„,, , . , _ _.. . . : . 1.•,• PROJECT DATA • - e..........______ 4 • •. LOCATION NE CORNER SUNSET a-VD ...,-- ,.........=.... .. . . . — ',' 1 , 9 132 ND AVE SE,RSITON WA I, 1 ! 1.... ."''' • 1 • i .• ' BUM 2 • " • - - -..: -...:.-- '. - ---- . .,-- e ' ,ii , ZONED 8-1 114.277 SOFT • ? . i: • i:. R-3 34.040 SC FT iiti .1iLi •_ I - —1!tux 1 . .r "a .1• • . ! r.r......r."*.• I : P.m.. • • •• • ''‘ 0! r-- .. , , . )._, / rf PROPOSED USE NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CT R R ESTALRAt;I,BAt:K.RE TAIL I 1 ' 1! 1 11 : . . . . 4 ',. , 2::••••-- -::;_iyi i CONSTRUCTION TYPE iii-N) ccA./......'di< Gt_t•ss :-.:i:- i: •.____,-, .,.. .1. , / ' I-27_-_---:•."•-.1-4,"----- ' ' .- .___. __1----_, ___. .. ---4 : i I j_E 1 • i FR,N T ///z/ ..)//— ••-•••••••• *,,,„ • .1 BUILDING AREA I ...1 ? 1 •• • / . . . .' ... -I I •l• EILEG 2 .77Z! , , - • • „ I , , i i....:./ .-- / -- --1 '. ELOG 3 4CCC 25.325 SO FT i_ I. . ' ; / I / i 1 / I H r ---1 .. I , : • . . -...._ i PARKING REQUIRED 55 STALLS PER 10O . - . I ' '. :. ‘‘ ,:, 1 I RH ' ---ill 139 STALLS ..,''''''•,-, I Fl I I, I i ,T i . _ , ,,„,.. L -- PARKING PROVIDED 147 STALLS P-1 ZCNE :4...,,L._._...... . t...........—••••...e. . ••-•— I ,..1.'.: ::"i'•--,-.• t, r—ITITT—." 11 I i _. . _ ._ .i •I . - • i: 72.-3---, 72.• .:..-... - - __-_, I. ; , • - ,,. i• --, . . " '• -12 . ,: a GENERAL NOTES iii [ iin i __.__ „. _ __ L..L...L. ,----- , , ' t' - • • i /:. .ii•..t,..„,.=...i N, I illiiiiidh -cs . -.., : 1.L Zan i " 1101.1L.1-tt.:ri.laz.1.1sossas:14.7 pa, Plaal plea c•Ss•stmattoll . • .--- • •- II 1 .........., ..- . k .....•• • i !" k_s t: . In. ''''''''''''.tmn,7.7.tr.a.-;:zr.;:a:L.27.',-.-"-- .• • • L- ki MUM=3-11.•inaL rearlsocorton 0,weer Flail plan s•o••.....ttall I" l" •••--------•\... 0 / Z ult.batlains gesunt epplIsAtism. I , • . --.... :.•:'-•/•--. . i ,./ A. PL.Min•Lreatts•ass very. PL.,loutla•t••••olkm.stsog•tch 1•11• 191 111•111t tepoll..... ri -• - ,‘-''!:•—••••. . .... _-1.—Liii 1 . i„.L.LL,' .71—/ -•—..._ e ) i::: tlinIrra:••=141:••It'••L.Z7Z11.1VP:711"•17....7•••'''... "...' . I . r • • • . 41.' a • i , . : . moil / , . / .. /., .'.. .f, rtasIzt.1.11%;:.1..11..al Lavalatm.Trot Ise•flea.att.woe als•plasi bp 1 BLDG 1 !L. Fes La*.Pl.mt eat 0•SalI•ow RA.L.I • •‘. . —'. , .. I -./ =;•••=.......=.. / .t.. •• r .- .---I I ' .....s.,. I I I i i i • . i . ..; i-- 1 I 1 I - - i. , LEGAL DESCRIPTION I , ,, I r..77:1 ..._____ . . . 1 . . \ , ... -• / -_, .. MST P0171011 0/1.100•51111.OC•1113 Or TVS POOPinalS 0TALPTifi 2, SiCTISE 1..10•101.1P:SIM,...“1 WT.P.•.CLOG CLL., '''.".''MI•l"Wert-15M.e'ln1T'r"' f'S'''';'10...'ST•rrir!:•"- La,WALLS].10 Tll Lk=LIM OP SAID IliSIRSIOS Sla 00 Illi 1,3 0It MS POW!OP InGINNLIK,PM.OWSI./.15/1101/01 11.13.11"Ls, •111.,.•MI.NM : • • 11,/t•M'2.11'sfre.-111rL°11,11411111:.1,'%AI::t./7•Ar.,.,L ...,11 VIM MP Sal1 SL1101,13.11 MC.MOM Olsil•11.WS/PALL/.WM •••••••••••• ...... •. WS 110r1INLI L1111 OP YID SISSITLIMS TS•LIM Ittrat LS PaLY.L.1101 al ..4 ...=....Z.Z.--•• ••• -.....7.•:',.--/ ' 17rIr LIISZN•lia WITAT2"Ltri./211:L"Mr=i%3=1.7,77.311'2, .—••=-'—' mr•-r.••••-•!••••••;••-••••—•:;;;7•07..'4 • YIP SL•1111111L01 WA,/131T.RM.OE L11S.•7 Ili MS MIPS OF SIc0111111. ...... ---, 132 ND AVE. SE. / flan... 4 _ ..._.. i . - 0,0//1 L/GAL 11101/1/1,00&LYS STO•OM.,SIMS 1•1441•2=Mal MOPS MO. 1,111 0/[11.21.11 11.11:1 si•%A.R. ,• 0 SITE PLAN r-L,7-1.-----1 \\ANA\.\\\\\ \\.\.\\ (...) r.20-0. EP2rik / . ; • - ' 4ii itz ' . . . ... OF RA, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON Co MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0eel g BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0A 235- 2550 0,9gTFD SEP'r �O MEMORANDUM April 24, 1981 TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Planning Department RE: SUNSET SQUARE SHORT PLAT, 116-80 The mylar for the subject short plat is attached here- with for recording with the King County Assessor' s office. All appropriate fees have been paid. There are no restrictive covenants involved. Thank you. wr INTER—OFFICE MEMO TO: Don Monaghan DATE 4/2/81 FROM: Planning RE: SUNSET SQUARE SHORT PLAT Please check subject short plat for closure, . obtain appropriate Public Works Department signatures , and return . Thank you. SUNSET SQUARE SH •RT PLAT SHEET SW. I/4 OF SW I/4, SECTION 3,TOWNSHIP 23 ,ie� s'N ,1� c,,ruo��Ic NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M W.M. . d r- k-- 1 ,w,g5 , • CITY OF. RENTON, .ICING COUNTY, WASH. v� r 2.47, �L�� s'wlc,N crclo{JE FeiL'� ).`,e,• - •"sue"r tLC„:7 WIE:E :cF. • o@� 954b)`�i g 1® 110. 2t u G- 49g.1� + Cv�-mD) .. 12' 1/ �I�l�. IOO.oI' �� �•P o z14.2g' CR N) 1J 4` 04ss 1'J 4-9 1 I I, 1�' a- 1 ti•34' O 0 3 ai 60 • jir A.34,022 SCE.FT. A=70,184 E0.FT. i A=V,570 SQ.FT. -- i ISP • `v I ",/'' Q WI NOi•11'S®"E 77.74" cr.N. . . I51 / /t FrI ci � a �. V•` hl1� ; 'U w Nt' • • Nol•li' E�IN m N $ : , , • r . if • `3. r N 00t$' i t° 1 .• °58'58"E 115.a -.. T r° / 4' 13: 1 3 -1 N Z 0 N O! �. r 1: 4 NQO°58'a'D•E 19b.G7' rMs d'A=a�s39sq.Fr. Y7 V' -�. ur • - .. , 0 ' / '' r."..."'''''''"q viep4•Vi . I .� "Ns•Cep�SO►Cti HOP. O�..✓ • 'Ptiz\�i. 306.27'(N) 1s47,61' M , S52..6:310-0 _ �l I I oo• 'SS"a_-• 74V3.1511(CeAx2) • 2F..2 .b7' (rle-AS.) Fi I... 23' 12"\NI Dee®) .. . r=- v/.`n,e. `.../4,•SW4 Or''SW—3 . 0 4�kisi V �• i S. �e % ,,•.. 41jwc, WO NION.� • up"1v1"" I� 1. �° �v / 14=1-1• ../-rhe-e_ex:66gre . ' :,..' o ,�,: .. . : DRT PLAT CERTIFICATE Richard L. Kloppenburq Order Number 41832 15404 Northeast Sixth Place Certificate for Bellevue, Washington 98007 Filing Proposed Plat In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Com- pany has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of King County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said King. County, to-wit: As in Schedule A, page 2 , attached. VESTED IN: RICHARD L. KLOPPENBURG and LYNN D. KLOPPENBURG, husband and wife , as to an undivided 35% interest; TERRY P. MIX, presumptively subject to the community interest of his spouse, if married on June 23 , 1980 , date of acquiring title, as to a 20% interest; GEORGE E. BARBER and JULEE K. BARBER, husband and wife , as to an undivided 25% interest; and HOWARD A. OLDS and LORNA S. OLDS, husband and wife, as to an undivided 20% interest. EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached hereto. Charge $0 .00 Tax $0 .00 Total $0 .00 Records examined to March 24 , 1981 at 8: 00 a.m. . CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY '__ BYT" le)UW-A-kd Roger rriere --- Title f-icer- 628-5686 ' — —Page-2--- 4 1 biZ That portion of the wthwest quarter of the sl hwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.1i. , in King County, • Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision; thence north 89°24 ° 22" east along the northerly line thereof, 372.37 feet; thence south 1 ° 10 °21 " east, parallel to the east line of said subdivision, 534 . 00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing south 1 ° 10 ' 21 " east 498 . 16 feet, more or less, to ghe northerly line of Primary State Highway Number 2; thence westerly along said northerly line to the easterly line of the westerly 30.00 feet in width of said subdivision; thence north 1 °23 ° 12" west parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning; thence north 89°24 ° 22" east, parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision 340.37 feet , more or less, to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT road. A.L.T.A.-COMMITMENT -- - - - 41832 -- - - - - - - SCHEDULE B STANDARD COVERAGE Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other mat- ters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 2. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. - 3 . Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. 4 . Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. 5 . Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or materi- al heretofore furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 6 . Liens under the Workman° s Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 7 . Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or con- struction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8 . General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessment and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9 . (a) Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; ( b) water rights, claims or title to water. ( continued) - A.L.T.A®-COMMITMENT --- -- -41832-- ------ SCHEDULE B Page 2 10 . RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: Reserving and excepting from said lands so much or such por- tions thereof as are or may be mineral lands or contain coal or iron, and also the use and the right and title to the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for mining opera- tions and the right of access to such reserved and excepted mineral lands, including lands containing coal or iron, for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same. RECORDING NUMBER: 60425 11 . DELINQUENT SECOND HALF TAXES: YEAR: 1980 AMOUNT BILLED: $540.21 AMOUNT PAID: $270. 11 AMOUNT DUE: $270. 10 PLUS INTEREST TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 032305-9011-03 12. GENERAL TAXES: 1ST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1, 2ND HALF DELIN- QUENT NOVEMBER 1 . YEAR: 1981 AMOUNT BILLED: $699 .28 AMOUNT PAID: $ 0.00 ' AMOUNT DUE: $699. 28 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 032305-9011-03 13 . DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Richard L. Kloppenhurq and Lynn D. Kloppenburq, husband and wife, as to an undivided 35% interest; Terry P. Mix, as his separate estate, as to an 20% interest; George E. Barber and Julee K. Barber, husband and wife, as to an undivided 25% interest; and Howard A. Olds and Lorna S. Olds, husband and wife, as to an undivided 20% interest TRUSTEE: Pioneer National Title Insurance Company, a corporation BENEFICIARY: Donna Smith Nolan and Arthur R. Beale, each as their separate estate, and each to an undivided one-half interest -- AMOUNT: $314 , 133.00 DATED: June 23 , 1980 RECORDED: July 15 , 1980 RECORDING NUMBER: 8007150049 The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness secured. - -(continued) - �- .. A-0L.T.A. COMMITMENT 41832 SCHEDULE B Page 3 14 . DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Richard L. Kloppenburq and Lynn D. Kloppenburq, husband and wife, as to an undivided 35% interest; Terry P. Mix, as his separate estate, as to an 20% interest; George E. Barber and Julee K. Barber, husband and wife, as to an undivided 25% • interest; and Howard A. Olds and Lorna S. Olds, husband and wife, as to an undivided 20% interest TRUSTEE: - - Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a corporation BENEFICIARY: City Bank AMOUNT: $195 ,000.00 DATED: June 23 , 1980 RECORDED: July 15 , 1980 RECORDING NUMBER: 8007150050 The amount now secured by said Deed of Trust and the terms upon which the same can be discharged or assumed should be ascertained from the holder of the indebtedness secured. 15 . Matters which may be disclosed by a search of the records against the name of the spouse of Terry P. Mix, if married. END OF SCHEDULE B CS/mjw = - - D-1434 , I cag®Title Insurance Comma . IMPORTANT:This is not a Plat of Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. Rr-i-i irtr) Zi-t) 4 5t1)4 ORDER NO. (--1/4\�32 1j1n3 deli of S+a-ta. RCS •fsa%. Se, Tw �3 5 , • . ___ ._ t 4,.;.. 3 AID 4-- . • 1 • ii.. kA n • ? �S t > . goo' I!i my • .AI,...," r+ • ***'''...4....,,Eivr ,... • _..... ay... 71-:'. '•••'-•`•' r ,.- -.,4 .t K11- '.-0`0- "':?-"--- • 30 50 - — — - PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98171 ow-slur m•fm.aseea • O F 1? s 16 - emu , o THE CITY OF RENTON U t� ?:« MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Go FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 90 SEP1����Q` February 23, 1981 Mr. Richard L. Kloppenburg 15404 N.E. 6th Place Bellevue, WA 98007 RE: File No. Short Plat 116-80, E-117-80, SA-104-80, V-105-80; Barber, Kloppenburg, Olds (Sunset Square) . Dear Mr. Kloppenburg: This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, for which a decision was published on January 19, 1981 , are considered final , and the application files will be submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. If you have not already done so, please contact the Planning Department for information regarding preparation of the final short plat mylar which will be filed with King County. Sincerely, #114_91.. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING- State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen — being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 19th day of January , 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. •'fir +'.• !.. _ 1 ;/•;-1 • Subscribed and sworn this V-.1-day of r'(dnv ?.r y , 19 c? '‘ . • Notary Public in and for th State car Washington, residing at \-t'-oroA Application, Petition or Case: Sunset Square; Sh. 01 . 116-80, SA-104-80 (The rn nwte,5 contain a tist 06 the patties 06 neeond. 1 V • PLANNING 1 EP m;aI T • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO °J 1LfE SING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 30, 1980 APPLICANT: BARBER, KLOPPENBURG, OLDS FILE NUMBER: SA-104-80 & Short Plat 116-80 & E-117-80 A. SliP2MIARY is PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests site approval for a. +25,325 square foot neighborhood shopping center consisting of 3 buildings and associated parking. Also sought is approval of a 4-lot short plat together with an exception to the Subdivision Ordinanceto provide access easement to proposed lot # 2. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: DONNA R. NOLAN 2. Applicant: BARBER, KLOPPENBURG, OLDS 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Vicinity of 1320 Union Avenue N.E. 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: +3.4 acres 6. Access: Via Union Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. 7. Existing Zoning: B-1 , Business Use; R-3, Residential Multiple Family; Minimum lot size 5000 square feet. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-7200, Residential Single Family; R-2, Residential Two Family; R-3, Residential Multiple Family; B-1 , Business Use 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial, Medium Density Multiple Family 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on • December 17 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on December 19, 1980. I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC. HEARING: SUNSET SQUARE, SA-104-80; Short Plat 116-80, E-117-80 DECEMBER 30, 1980 PAGE TWO C. TISTO:WBACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2472 of March 28, 1969 at which time the present zoning classification was applied. The property was rezoned from "G" to B-1 and R-3 by Ordinance #3420 of May 7 , 1980 with certain restrictive covenants. (See attached) D. u SIC BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The subject site rises slightly from south to north at approximately a 4 percent grade. 2. Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, row crops and for urban development. Ragnar-Indianola association, sloping (RdC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper part of th is soil and rapid in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate. These soils are used for timber. 3. Vegetation: Scrub brush is the dominant feature with a few junipers and some scattered evergreens. 4. Wildlife: Existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat fOr birds and small mammal . . 5. Water: Honey Creek flows across the southerly portion of the property in a southeasterly-northeasterly direction. 6. Land Use: An older vacant single family residence is located near the center of the subject site with the remainder undeveloped. E. NEgG BO r.,O® cw,:P;r;AG'IERISTICS: The surrounding properties consist of a mixture of single family, multiple family and light commercial uses. F. PfU'TLICG SER ICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: 12" water mains are located along Union Avenue N.E. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. An 8" sanitary sewer extends east-west on Sunset Blvd. near the east end of the subject site and second 8" sewer runs north-south on Union Avenue on the south side of Sunset Blvd. In addition, the Sunset lift station is located adjacent to the subject site on Sunset Blvd. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue N.E. at_N.E. 12th Street within 500° to the south of the subject site. 4 . Schools : The subject site is within 1/2 mile of the Honeydew and Sierra Heights Elementary Schools and within 1-1/2 miles of McKnight Junior High School and within 1/2 mile of Hazen Senior High School. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SUNSET SQUARE, SA-104-80; Short Plat 116-80; E-117-80 DECEMBER 30, 1980 • PAGE THREE 5. Recreation: The subject site is within 1/2 mile of Kiwanis Park to the south and within one mile of the proposed King County Park west of Sierra Heights Elementary School. G. n;r'PLICABT, d SECTIONS IO1NIS; OF ThIg ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-709A, R-3; Residential Multiple Family 2. Section 4-711 , B-1 ; Business District H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF TIEHE COMPoinuliSIVE PLAN OA OTHER OFFICIAL CITY : 1 . Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, 1965, Objective #6 , p. 18 2. Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1105, Short Sub- divisions. 3. .Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1109 , Exceptions. I. IMPACT OF 'I :,r- NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVI,';w T: • 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will disturb the soils, remove the vegetation, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, these impacts can be mitigated. • 2. Population/Employment: The proposal should not significantly affect population but increased employ- ment opportunities may be expected. ' 3. Schools : Not Applicable 4 . Social: Increased opportunities for social interaction may result from the additional employment generated by the proposed project. 5. Traffic : The Traffic Engineering Division estimates total trip generation to be 115. 8 trip end per 1, 000 square feet of retain space plus the impact from the drive-in bank. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/TH ES m OLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a. declaration of non-significance was issued for the Site Approval subject to available sewer capacity and payment of fees for traffic impacts ($20/trip generated) by the ERC on November 5, 1980. K. 'AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. • 5. City of Renton Fire Department. PLANNING DIRECTOR PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SUNSET SQUARE, SA-104-80; Short Plat 116-80, E-117-80 DECEMBER 30, 1980 PAGE FOUR L. PI wIG ilEPA;,'1rill21? wa:ALYSIS: (Site Approval and Variance) 1. The proposed neighborhood shopping center use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of commercial, B-1, zoning for the subject site. The conceptual condominium or professional office use slated for the R-3 portion is also consistent with the existing zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation of medium density multiple family. 2. These proposed uses may also be considered compatible with the existing land uses on adjacent and surrounding properties. 3. As submitted, the applicant 's site plan proposes a complex composed of 3 one-story buildings totalling 25,325 sq. ft. with a concrete block architectural treatment accented by a tile and cedar canopy. Likely occupancies include a bank, restaurant, and assorted retail enterprises. 4 . Parking required and parking provided for the various structures in the B-1 zone can be summarized as follows based upon the Parking & Loading Ordinance standard for shopping centers of 5. 5 stalls/1, 000 sq. ft. of gross floor area. Building #1 3600 sq. ft. ) Building #2 17725 sq. ft. ) Parking required: 139 stalls Building #3 4000 sq. ft. ) Parking required: 147 stalls Total 25325 sq. ft. 5. There has been concern among various city departments and area residents regarding drainage and storm water runoff in this vicinity. As a result, the City Council requested a study of the subject proposal and related area developments to determine sewer and water capacities. An attached memorandum from the Public Works Director addresses this concern. 6. Relative to the findings outlined in $5, the Utilities Engineering Division advises that an approved water plan may be required as per Fire Department requirements for on-site hydrants. In addition, the applicant will be subject to latecomer' s agreements for sewer on Union Avenue and for water on Sunset Blvd. Standard hookup fees for sewer and water and an area charge for the Honey Creek trunk line will also apply. 7. A pre-construction conference with the Fire Marshall will be required as per Fire Department comment. 8. Both the Police Department and the Traffic Engineering Division have advised that the drive-in lane to • the proposed bank at the southeast corner of the subject site be expanded to (2) 9-foot wide lanes. This is recommended because both departments anticipate that vehicles will stack up on Sunset Blvd. and become a traffic hazard. At the same time, this will reduce the required 15 ' landscape buffer on the east property line to at least 7 ' . This is true for the southerly 160' of the property. Therefore, the applicant will have to either reduce the size of the proposed structure or adjust the location of the building. The 15 ° landscaping strip is required by restrictive covenant. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SUNSET SQUARE, SA-104-80, Short Plat 116-80, E-117-80 DECEMBER 30, 1980 PAGE FIVE 9. The Police Department also requests that lighting in the parking lot and on the buildings should be placed such that it shines on buildings rather than out into the street and parking areas. (See additional comments) . 10. Assessments for City improvements will total $58, 652 as reported by Traffic Engineering. This is for the commercial portion only. The future professional office uses or condominiums will have to be addressed later. Consult this department for details. 11. A variance from the rear yard setback has been requested by the applicant. . The proposed Sunset Square development is adjacent to a parcel of property zoned R-3. Under the Subdivision Code, Section 4-711 (d) a special setback requirement is required on all yards when adjacent to residential zones. Therefore, the setback requirements of the adjacent R-3 zone would apply. This would require a minimum of a 20-foot rear yard per Section 4-709A(d) . The other front and side yard requirements have. been met. The proposed Sunset Square shopping center fronts upon Sunset Blvd. N.E. The applicant has recently obtained a rezone subject to certain setback requirements and specific landscape buffers. The Hearing Examiner must determine that to grant a variance that certain conditions must apply. Condition A: That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstance applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive the subject property owner rights and priviledges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classifications. The specific rezoning .of the property required that a northern buffer of R-3 zoning be included in the development. Therefore, the zoning itself has met the intent of the required rear yard by providing a buffer of lower use residential or possible office uses to buffer the northern edge of the commercial development. This buffer is 5 times that required by Section 4-709A. Therefore, the specific application of the Zoning Code deprives the applicant of his rights which were applied to him as a conditional approval in said document. The subject property has been more restricted by the rezone than would normally be considered on adjacent subject properties. Condition B: :_That the granting of the variance will not be materially deprimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zoning which subject property is situated. The applicant is proposing a shopping center contained in itself with immediate buffering to the north which shall result in a reduction of the impact of the shopping center upon the existing single family residential to the north. The R-3 property PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SUNSET SQUARE, SA-104-80; Short Plat 116-80, E-117-80 DECEMBER 30, 1980 PAGE SIX which provides this buffer is designed as a working part of the shopping center. It does not appear that granting the variance will be materially detrimental ) to the public welfare or injurious to any of the property or other improvements in the vicinity and the zone in which the subject property is situated. Condition C: That the approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and the zone in which the subject property is situated. The rezoning of the subject site put specific limitations on the development above that normally considered in the zone in an attempt to mitigate those impacts upon adjacent properties and would be considered in any future applications in the area for a similar rezone. , This has been fairly established practice throughout the Highlands to create use or landscape buffers between existing lower density uses and proposed higher density uses. Condition D: That the approval as determined by the Examiner or Board of Adjustment is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose. The Exminer has previously considered in the rezone request that the use buffer of 100 feet is adequate to provide the minimum intent of the ordinance. Therefore, the variance should be granted totally because it has been replaced by specific conditions approved by both the Examiner and the City Council. 12. The landscaping plans as submitted .generally conform to the restrictive 'covenants of the rezone and the standards of the Parking & Loading Ordinance with the exceptions noted in #8 and #11. Further details of size, spacing, numbers and types of species will require approval at the building permit stage. M. Dr "ARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION:: (Special Permit, Variance) Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval of the site plan subject to compliance with items L76 through L-10. L. PLANNING DEP \i'MMENT ANALYSIS: (Short Plat) 1. The proposed short plat is consisent with the Compre- hensive Plan and zoning designation for the subject site and surrounding area. 2. The subject proposal consists of 4 lots ranging in size from ±24 ,820 sq. ft. to 162, 577 sq. ft. 3. Each of the proposed lots meets or exceeds the minimum standards of the Subdivision Ordinance for size and frontage. However, the applicant is requesting an exception for access to lot #2 by easement over Lots 1 and 3. This proposal includes parking, utilities , ingress and egress to cover all of the paved parking areas. Termed "a reciprocal cross easement" . This approach has been used previously at the Redwood Plaza Center in Bremerton and the Alderwood Retail Center in Lynnwood. The Hearing Examiner approved a somewhat similar request in • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: SUNSET SQUARE, SA-104-80; Short Plat 116-80, E-117-80 DECEMBER 30, 1980 PAGE SEVEN the Doug Weston Short Plat (Short Plat 061-80) . on August 1, 1980. A related exception was also requested and recommended for approval by the Planning Department in the Puget Power Short Plat (Short Plat 100-80) . Therefore it would appear that there is some precedent for this request and that justification can be provided (Section 9-1109) . However, the primary argument supporting the granting of the exception is the specific language of the parking and loading ordinance which considers the difference between a normal retail facility and one designed as a shopping center. This distinction of function is the basis for granting the exception. 4 . The Engineering Division advises that all off-site improvements are to be installed in conjunction with the initial development on the property. See other comments. 5. A utility plan to service the proposed properties will be necessary as per Utliities Engineering Division comment. This is to be provided in conjunction with the pressure water plan required by the Fire Deprtment for the site approval. M. D' ,"ARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: (Short Plat) Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of the short p lat subject to meeting the requirements noted in L-4 and L-5. It is recommended that the exception be granted due to the previous actions referenced in both the City of Renton and other municipalities. • • „fo- a ____-- uns[[i nuuu AS ufng ii ^ AlRE p Im:l'imn b®[vrff v nv16N.n,u»us mean - •0h',,. [ft:.a lavlu'Et SIAM,.„tan o c-,u n.,n,nic s,m�a+:rrnui as.a. '�" »fn ma.ta mr.,.xrf0.,c MI"n•Soft,v nns. • ^04'�� Or - .6,Q]l • 'Luny,ran. 4•SYSTEM �6 ,^�? __ ac,M OS SWAM m..n KEEP. i`ira-r.0.,n..»r S Smo°M° n»., e.MAID M.a,ns t[u WA m[n. - our v,[no.m,cmc m.sw.v FEET. u LESS.,0 • ,_v�•�?:S'. 01E111,.f,>.,•es,..n. M� V LEaf.... _to " f ,.'� �t,5 nuuaun.0 u..cu,c m r x..ry[���'OL S,n on...c[,[.5...,ISO Wit LIEF OF 114 ..n ___ +, sr..ES Flay?,Eit,tie MST.ait.2 SYS,AS Oa.. o....a It.T41ni-ur,..1 ws,n,rcm.a o „-,ur. [......[.an a, n v vv f s R(s},�F t . unSfa.u;ra.»s.»n. ou,.o.,.,9 ecfn[.e � n,[sr v0 n. ,n ,...5. »a„�. . _� ',•,r::' sm,rt.ur v 3L=i„tan,n'ii.lA rig.fa..'f COMIC,u,ssr b.v[MI,n l.bs an,i. _ •h.' x f ' C nnllfs..,al „t5.5 1 nffi3='^ ,' f BARBER, KLOPPENBURG & OLDS a 1 '- r: LXISTING CONDITIONS SA-104-80 \ o r,, �. .A,,� —,�4 - r° �, 1,a ' �,, 1/;,i .na.n,.c r...a,n..0,.0;w.r wo.r.rr.*� o+m,vn a.c. \ \�' ��`.f,r �_-A�'%rr_ f 1 .' 3:. • •I• L -_ - - --�=- '.r _ t / 1 \ °---".*1 ;_ % i r^z__� • _ /,�?�` /. :.�. ,� VICINITY MAP w t"--,.',1 cc' co is /- 1 , _,/ `, // / o, i a° L. .1 N w / J J ww.f. g /I —. '/-- --�� °•°i; /, / ; Ii I / I I NOTE r<...-�,c. .wa,w r.,�,ti...> _ �„�-'a�, • � .J �r I I i \ i a0,0 5 • g si \N �•I ° f I Y. I I I `1 " >w 659'' �e v �� �_r*— sue\ s \ 111 r`.' Cr yv j i' s + ° i �� d IV 1 pa J Qd ZONED i ZONED rvD % ��c � I I/ .t• /i/ J� ~ 'I,' ,' I --��'• � -._ Y_ ,,',t ':a 1 `- ii __-0'/ /. i / / o',---. ... m i ..� S. % H .s=z_a �' - '� / �� •/I" I a / LEGEND. r,, / .1 # Fi /-----_____ 5 'V - _ - -1, , __ / /� �// / / Z. �f7 f .� . may® te // • 41 t____•!!' . ..-------- . 7 / i • i .? / / E01 ...yap',Ls 'EFt. .'4, ' „.... ----\-•-589-- al TI..........e Po-A 1 I. ',k, . :-.------ __---41--_______ k_____ . -- • i - n. o' _ ;/ ea, ^ // : nmbe sr -�J + �/. - J / . m MOREL bf . a >n I- n 6 •- -' T - -i � ^ •'}/ j / i£ 'S.F l 1 •I. e, • ""'::t.' I3ZND AVE.S.E. ,»..° j -- - --- - rec..=n cut uou°C ---- •• • p �s� UNION AVE.N.E)K -_ �_-L i f J.—. !.— —.,,.ter. —_—.w...,v So»c Z. y .. —mow • v • i 0-y.00s 1,04/ I f • BARB�IR KLOPPLNBURG & OLDS - '' ' ' 1 t.'M1° \.- 'fig r-s a • 1r�? ' il�T ♦ ° SA-104-80 - _ i' '`' SITE PLAN i �—� ...: . .. ._,. — �I` PROJECT DATA 21resoareme Ka^ �.-^� � t- I LOCATION N.E.CORNER SUNSET BLVD. '` -L.. ti ........a i l r R a 132 Na AVE. SE.,RENTON.WA. • 1 i ► 111 [ > 1 1 1 i t LD3 2 «d t �0(i 3 /1 1s1 I ZONED B I 114.277�.Fie o '; R-3 34.040 SO.F. • �•+�V I I r rr�\\\. �: PROPOSED USE NEI(}IBORHOOD SHOPPING CTR. IREABANRETL STRUCTION TYPE_�; .. �. BUILDING AREA BLDG I 3600 �l — .. �} jl BLDG 2 17725 1 ;= 1� 1 11 I I I l l i i i i I 1 I• BLDG 3 24325 SO.FT. • • lull ! l ll l l l l l ll ry PARKING REQUIFD 53j - � •�^+•%^•� ,...} PARKING PROVIDED 147LSNE IIIIL it• __ ------ I I l l l l l f I i I f I f l I %�' ....v , GENERAL NoTEs --- - 1 i _ I 1 I f l f l l l l i l l l l [ ig,"‘/ \-1I� ,� ,.. . y \vnasI-4ud•. i gt* / '"aw"m'.- • \ I , TOLOIC s-Si..m!coefl..[bo o eery. Final 71.ca c•uGvtct.I �, —_—I • _ ' / 2 .r�eaal,uel re..tc.avlllac.W:m co �� ` TOO Uln- be sub... nelu �T_.,...;I., r-- I ( 1 111 f rlrlUIU gym:` • • • 1 I I 1 I l f • • .:.•.••-••i f 1 / ::/ M c lush.\ c.•••es text\.otl...t\eax bt.[Im.Os louttea.¢ u ptm y 7. 1�,py 1 _• t -l ro7r xaesuP nee ee.I.e.ea Cm.41 I t - , -' ; a i t 1 % LEGAL DESCRlPTBOf� J I I v ,1 - '' "." TImnales os T.®s1 POKERS or,u mvlamST PILOTS ODOM,or II C L J. -a•Q "••,I m u rolws: s fur..:.. OT.SOOTS .•...,.; �.... , Ic:anat"T3ma�r�xm,`im'a os1'loxiIDsuii.9\.1601010.21T �r¢2 IbQ - - •... +.-'�=1 �^ ..... ..... .. .. �6�erowo>mtnt¢:or ravusr ales e n a.ate¢• _ x\s®ua.or DO m x m.m (r.L'1� _ osuelvISIO: t s•1x^m'r MAILS nn1 t`_.^} J ITILT•LIM OF SAID m\I.ssla: Lmon ADD WILD1161111®IIITILICTSs ODAL IS DOD TOE tITO MS MST 07 vGIIOI G,TOMOS 1OF sum WWI,PA mains rotor ai12.•L Hc1 - 132 ND AVE. SE, / ABOVE 1.1.1.ITSCDIFTIOD SAS. MOM TIED 1o\\rs.mfenl FIRM IV. 4 Ii3fs a.ODOM.31.1179 AT SOO AT. 6 SITE PLAN r .I' . VJ I / =20'-0 • 1 • /, . . /U.IflOr ri 111 11 i 1 1 . . •• BARBER, 1:17_,OPPENBURG, & OLDS . • ),•;1.,,I:',,,i111 I. i ;II ,1 i SA-104-80 ; •.:0'...... !,,,-cP. ' -To::: , ,-.. • - -.,;: '••-- - - 1 LANDSCAPING PLAN it 1 ,,.;..1:.,,, 7, : er....,...iivvtoe... * ,,,,,ri. „,_ ,....1,,,TA-4,-=...,..-.,72 I FENCE DETAIL . - . . • 1 . .• . 1 -,.... .....• ...-,..,„,...., \ I ( ?;•,.. .AN= ....tZs '' 4 q... '.' = .1,:i6,.`4 4 ....a.=a...-..2 4'‘.•,,,........-....' 'I,- -r - -,,--4.-. - -...-....., - .: I .... .........-.,mar. ...,,.....,t-,44.1,e*Ale."....V.r.g.',...5'47 ' '''T.-..„ , ,,4:-.,,,..,...„,..,....,,,,... .:.- ,,,„ ..„.., .....-„...,..,._....,„ --4:„_ .,, ". .., vkd,f-,ts.f 'tt-„_,-t-,, -- ., ---: ,s,'•:ii.t.416.1. 4.14..4:...!--4 vzia. -a - ?" I\-- - . -, _,.... ate 4 I. ' lit BLDG 2 • ..... • . •.I 51, -=•- ----.._1111-11 I 1 . I ,- \ BLDG 3 ,,,44 i• ,t I 1 .2 • • ) ..' ' I , • 1 I I i „•-g- a I 1--.-- I r .f....." . ' 1 -...... 1 . — .,„ ; /•,,,-...c..:„,' , \ . , . • ..e,'",. i , . i 1 i •.4 :7 „,. . 1 ,„:.. -- ,„Th `,".,,.'\ ft' '.-,'‘_,--...; ,.‘) . '„:".•'.,, ,,,.. \ ___ _,.....„.... ! i„,,, i,,,-.) .:._. .._„, _ • _, , „.... . ___ _ ,, . , ,. , , ._____ , ) _ , , . , ,.. . r..s:.1 i VI • .; •I —, •,' -,),--.., 1 . ,• —7- ' I \ fl rak '.... ' .: . .,. , . . i i 1 i i ' I" :).. ......_ - , ;•-•'-'t7.7.7---:'. 10N IL IglitHill 11 t 3 --11"-I I ,-- , - , , ....." „ i•://` . : ' '11 . 1 o• i . -01-....-..4.1r I 1 . , • „ ',.• •.,./. '',../.,/ ;I., . , i -C.),•-; .!.. 1 , ir...)7 I' I.-.'I ,•,,,,,,,' .....- '. • 4 ', 1 1 i 1 '.1/4i 1.4 , '4,';':•M' 1 i 1 tau I 0- . ' 1 • ' 1. NI I 1 TO > d .-.-.7.4 • #•• W 1 ____ - 11 Ill i I i i ' I iillill I iti;i:I ,. .4... i..,... ,..........,...'.. _,I...,„1„..„ ___,.......,_v_...,,v .......4 1 ./...,..p, it,,,, 11-- . - •....t ,;.T.,,1 1 -,... f „/ 4E-.....,.....-7.,.... , 1. 1---—4..„...rizi—; 1 . '- -vt::::-.^.....--7,----. r•W , ,- PLANTING SCHEDULE ,A.J.,4•,,,,,, , ,. s _ . ... -,,•,,,, ----is„-i..,____ ! 1 i i i. ii i r _=,_OUANITY BOTANICAL NAME CC5MMON NAME SIZE •.‘, , 1 111111- '.---: ;`,11-1 ''''.77 / I • -....., ..__.• . ' . • ,,,4••„g it,t_,•A N.: ,, -1,---,, ,„,..,, .... ......, , • . .1 _L_, ..., r_ in , iii .... . .. „ .,_ (47'1 .--,-.4. #5.,:: 41.,74. -1... Ahodu ..!. / EM - in .,,,,,,..--4. .' • . * ' '`:', '`'Or'-$'‘,-I':5,,i• e itl':)1'514`: ' '01,A 1 BLDG I / • • ....,-...-:-...,.. I.C.,...- . — ' ' r-i I 1 t I /--z?.7....-z..-- 44 . ., ' 4. . 1 ., ..,.:"'" ' ."'V A p , .•.•/ / • cl• ..tee pe...,, ,=== i1111 ,.. ...40z .... , :- ...,-, 1 1 A / NEVE 1111 g. , ,-.•,.0 kw. .111=111. 1. .'",,::,,.1' — ' /1;.7...' I • I ...F. r- . , ,,•417.• /„4.1 t."'r 1 .. ' • --• - ..-.•• -•.....J.2.•.-,•=1.'.4 4`;',1 ^ ....'t . 1 3.t.f. ,— :3;').74:!4•PA-k.V1 1i* - ',-1, -,E.,4•41" '''1 „41. -''/ i ,I-gtx--:, 0 ,,.. !_ _, ,..,,,t•• •-..17 ,,, • ,,,?,...? ..k• •••4#. ,_,....4. . L.-A,- . .c.,...4*".41.`'.4'' RI...:7.1.•46,.,_,,,.*:f Are.,W- N ,_,3AA,."...Z.yrietile,"'44'., ' ' ....."/ .'.''' ' '7:...-I :',..%DI 2.V.,..45ti..'",..44‘..,,,:*'t'''' ;"/ . . . .. •- I 4 I ...., t......zz. . - C.,--L. . . . .77.1.,...:::..T.%''synwelf-_.-et' ' . --, 132 ND AVE. SE / .. • e SITE PLAN 71-7-1 I h_ / ... "'L E.- . (.,). ..... . .. . . . I BARBER, KLOPPENBURG, & OLDS SHORT PLAT 116-80 Exception - E-117-80 . <J, 2 � � : T�y. CITY OF RENTON , KING COUNTY, WASri. -L'�. I�23 1 , fir, 5 ��. HIlyH cYclou- FE.ry- �F`�,.� t ULrJ g�eg �JIP_E FcfY� G -jcJl,f?rl oe2 I'5 .Sir°vei-6 — ft - J``*, , Gi34.ao'CPec-D),- �-r— 1/ -S I o .I O' ZI e 498.1:4 ±. Coeao) - ' I 4 of- n<7'� 01V1- t __-- -.. .: y • - mar ! I.'. 38" /. G69-z�' � 4 y 1 �I,1 { �y( �,,1y !oo.o!' ` " 109.75' C . (H 'Ii) 4"104' a1, �/ gc, 49' - alp SU13.9i\76 111, '¢.cc I '\Q loo. I p. , ..3tr' Sin" iit- ;; V-.1Ce c,i-fri ul,k1 , - - - le. ,...z9.o,, `fY `( UfJ '(c T f.i�Tl'r I-25' 1221 '�5I �� LOT 4- LOT Z • LOT _3 �L J --' I9 �7Ug(�I- P=. 4,OZI.9 5Q.�T A=CoZ, 77.3 5 FT. °- - `I),i- "JITI-} '(I-E'r kt.)1+-t- N,0 Q• y, A 26.995 7 �iY.Fr v 4., ;J �} -. .., /$J \�/f-'r_i- 1 L} �' , - 0(- , •,� -i- �l ?tip;j�>;UG� Aitr 1 art' VI ;! T+t - rF t� 1�J p r Ir • _NJ • i - 1,1�1.111�;�-i o y 1ll G y- N,{ '• C ! ll O;°!!'":�' �`.,/,.• r. IS -' tJ-C `(- . 4 N(W\• -� 177.7i' i,- s J �+ 11- r)N ,1% w _ / d p _ I ��_ c.r) r1 , e, ") :' L-- — L:: n 8' N (V ID • cur 5 J !_OT I p " . w - i o o 'IG= J E� r C� G A=24,820 Sg-FT. I '_J� �' v 1 '� . _... ,..„, ,,z, .......,_ 2 D I Air Nl fn ... f.;p ,-lYse-ti.CG1-1. ,I--L 0 - - - - 3CS.76' (i-il -- ; 0C5,rilE 1Ir-- U p C�c m - I312.y3'( Lc) ) g34.O3'CCJIc.) 'r,_ — 36v.Z7'Cr-0 _ . '382.63'i*'1) - - — 1 '� �L p cY_,-Sa'Sf3" E - 2(cZri.3I'(Cc-AS) �:,25.07' (r'1F_/.,5.) ♦,t I. vs. °\,/(7 =2 �� - — _ ��`rL_ s. • CN',1.lie Sv✓ ."5 ./ of -5-.3, -- J "rz3N.IF'.y .,AVI-). - - - --- -- - Up1OL! , \/ ii'cr ki. :v �r No G,yS�o e • • • C�aul�o QC, t-toN.� I r rb!�. /T�L��a ® ! 1 / Ear of -Se . I_I{JE. — �.., .l 1 - = 1 l' - I' '' '�' , I -- ..:3- ;1- . . Mrs. Arthur Beale • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS !' WHEREAS,''. Arthur Ra Beale and ,his wife Dorothy M. Beale, and,Donna R. Nolan, as . tom: ,' her separate estate, '-are the owners of the.following•reai:property in the City of Rentoon,' ;County of King, State of Washington; .described. as follows: . •�•1 : . That portion:of: the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 3, 'a Township 23 North,:,Range..5 East, W.M. ,' in 'King County, Wa, described as ' ' ` follows: • Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision; thence north 89-24-22 . CD east along the northerly line there of 372.37 feet; thence south 1-10-21. . •., east11[n� 534.00 feet to the true,point of beginning; thence. south 1-10-21 east '498 :.:'2 .1 rt q• +�.'. }. bn- ^47a thence, 94J,• 3S`+Z'f� . ' �; •zZ61.. ee :•:14.0A`.;;ci r ? �` '3,0.1,0 beginning:.,. y•;; ii� �j y • . ..i.. . 4t '^ +}�.. ._ ••+..�.:�.. s!A,...Ir�•-.:" •6'�c.., i E����`M;'.`:, t- .ra uN .�i�+.� '�`e ^ „" .� "l"' ��I:�l, • �- ;;:,;�.� , ei2-,--,,ieriCQ=sfeste y,-aYoili ,daicl 'northerly line to the easterly line of the. •.7 westerly 30 feet in width of said subdivision; thence north 1-23-12 west ' ::% parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which is eN2 parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning; thence north 89-24-22 east parallel with the • ;� ' northerly, line of said,.subdivision 340.-37. feet j.'more.•or less', .to the true • point of beginning, EXCEPT:"road. . i . • I4HEREAS, the owners-Of said' described property, hereinafter "the property," ' desire to impose the following,restrictive -covenants running with the land as .to use, present and future, of the property; :, ; ' . . ., NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose. . restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land . . hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as :follows: . • :.‘,.,:,;. _ ti..,.:• ,,o,:,::a.•,,,i, t':?'.i?.,,,, .4,vm•z^ :fit: Nps:GF.1A.K''.rkanE gAlgS"+:r'Yatt:?!3• .,,: .:mw,aa..,sftr o.vv, ,42i,v;gp:*sc1.1.14.?4 ,ias?s.•.. a.r?iaM • It shall be the responsibility of the owners of• the property -to install and maintain a 20-foot landscape buffer and:fence along the north•property line, and. to, install'-`.; , and maintain a '15-foot.landscape buffer and fence along the east property line. . •' Honeydew Creek shall be preserved and incorporated into any development plans for ::.. the property. • DURATION-" • These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the . • Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminatewithout necessity of further . documentation. . . .. Proper legal procedures in the Superior, Court Of King County may be instigated by ' • • .ei'th'er,the City .'of';R nton, Or: e y=":p5 mp ty gcan'd s::--adjoining ds. jest. ro ert who. a; n,;:m are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred: during;:an:,enforgement',proceeding will be borne .> .by the parties whom the court:determines are in.error and shall be entered as a judgment in,such action. .• • IL.LL.� I'oi• :°F�.cv{ # ;ul_ J3,.''4• ile. .. � , frt,-r3l . • , . . Arthur R. Beale 'a ctv�itt.,..i i'a'' v.t " .,.ew. Rti E `l•t;N, Av Sii. 05, ,,s- 5 G 'G :• -G� G AG- • . /" f ) ..- 4 .�L. , ' -._.. �.._ 4._. ..... .___.. • •-'Dorothy. M../Beale STATE OF WASHINGTON) • COUNTY OF KING • ) . : : .. Page One of Two • • 'On this . �ILA day of !�• `j-� 19 10�, before me personally appeared Ar-Shur R Beale and his wife Dorothy M. Beale, the persons who executed the within `z and foregoing 'instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and •voluntary: 'act''and'd6ed' of.'said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN. WITNESS: WHEREOF_ ,:-I•„have'''-hereunto:;set`'My.:hand and affixed my official seal `' the day and'•year' first •abo've Written:.''. .d0 - Notary Public. in and for thetate' of.Wash ngtcin :-l:?'•-"'�?' 'tic;r:L-�.: :+,'.,:.R.�'� ,=r;w�`'` s';;�1s_.`"li: ,ya .ti'�',?.•t%ki''':'�a YU'�'+ _?.4��;r gam,( +rM� .t. .a •�i1S.1�R4!`-�,pf��.`";;CA ,n���) ., :M. '�;, :'L.i..::vi,.. .:y',"�y,. .,r�irj. 'izyY•tgo,, s, � *. a°Y!).;�,,��,�,.�Y•� `d •vgtS't �1,. j "'7¢�5'�. ,'1^•e��';`I;o _,`'F ".tip=-;T`a'tD' w'•4 . �T,•, e.1 "'�.C.N 1.. :F'k'f'.'Tr`' �•>,l.S,,,,,'t',J'1t(:'e,�'(•.rzM.pp r ? r}{Ydgy' .�yk' 'y T k'41,T :.3,,x9i .' tSi'94/'� .. ypyj('j ij.?� ,•�•. ;j�� �1:Vic:s'wi.yr x�(,) p " 'd•Yi•'C,rvhV• ,"+'1.,".'C�`.?f:it }t -Y. 'S �• *I • ) 1 ' :: ,;:;;:,Donna:R '-No n' C'as her 'se- arate::.estate'. : _ :fir'- - • _ 1;: STATE.9F WASHIN rT COUNTY OF KING On this .."9 day of , .19 , before me personally appeared Donna R. Nolan, the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to. be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned: . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my and and ,affixed my official ,seal),.. } the day and year first above written. •Fs�.`.b: �.�r,ire.'tiaf+$�>.+T:�iwC"�?^'a4es•' 6dCa"' ?PoSi+' ".64,=i5�'ahi'�+a*ce, • - .(� • 4 n e' of Washington,_ residing in • RECORDED f'AY .irR 7 II .to '" '" REC Rf,(- ,4 ELE�i'f� S KING Ui;;1N T. Y • ` "' " • :Page Two of Two I, •• • OF I?4' M © PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT of , z WARREN C. GONNASON. P.C. ® DIRECTOR p ale= y4.3 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 f41.-ILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.96055 Aso ,o' 0 9�TFo SE PI 206 235-2569 BARBARA V. SHINPOCH MAYOR November 24, 1980 Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor and Members of the Renton City Council Municipal Building Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Sunset Lift Station Dear Mayor Shinpoch and Council Members: Attached to this memorandum is reports, previous memorandums and data relative to the Sunset Lift Station and the proposed Kennydale and Honey Creek sewer interceptors. Based upon the attached analysis and the present circumstances, it is recommended as follows: 1 . That connections to the systems served by the Sunset Lift Station be prohibited by moratorium following the connection of the following properties which are in permit application process: a. 75-unit apartment complex on the east side of N.E. 12th Street and Union Ave. N.E. b. 16-unit duplex complex southerly of the shopping center at Sunset and Duvall Ave. N.E. c. Neighborhood shopping center at N.E. corner of Union and Sunset. d. Small L. I .D. proposed by Shannon O'Neil to serve the northeast corner of Sunset and Duvall Ave. N.E. The total connections of the above properties will be less than the calculated 361 units which would still be allowed under the attached analysis. This moratorium could be immediately effective subject to the exemption of those properties. 2. That the City proceed and authorise a revenue bond issue in the amount of $2,000,000 for the purpose of providing the financing necessary to con- struct the Honey Creek and Kennydale interceptors.. A complete analysis of the debt service requirements for this bond issue will' be coordinated with the completion of our Water & Sewer Rate Study estimated to be com- pleted on December 15th. We feel that there is good probability that this bond issue can be serviced without an increase in the sewer rates and If such an increase is required, it would be only a small increase u : �La.��fii3'a.wi-� '�i,:y�i+Y.n'sfi(:ur:m:'.tYc1%rrc5•r.4 .;h •, _� n- f-.'.ii+•'W..v�'A.' vt4..'dtn..•..._s ::h• u�.t�''. - •_• • • ;.riitWe.. r:w•::s-.ti,:•. u�u.i'-=L�t,a,;:it:.ir�'> �.....:.:. .a<:xG:m:gWaa:'� .iS.;.•vi,.adw«wb,....rL`:•.''.,S•.`... .1:._; 1 " I . ' / Mayor & City Council -2- November 24, 1980 for a short period of time. 3. Based upon the bond issue Inc 2. above, request Metro to proceed with the construction of the May reek interceptor. • In our 1981 budges, we have requested funds for a complete analysis and comprehensive plan of our sewer system. This will include an inflow infiltration analysis along with a recommended cost-effective solution to the inflow and infiltration problem. Very truly yours, °"-----) r // f �. Warren C. Gonnason, P.E. Public Works Director WCG:jt cc: City Attorney Engineering Supervisor Hearing Examiner Planning Director • tip i, '8.' Y Y; i, i tk .•'""�Sa* '', ?�y, �,y'",�"kL'{yi�y vy w 1}�'`P `r =5 ++ v".aF +.r, ��, *"w'' ' ,( " .- fT`', 1 i Y.d,t r;sal . h1�5"r#�"'"li• e w �.21:e. 0 "• 4.y*+,,ft. qR �f`1 �'x{ '14fi ,ro 3:, >b«' .a p� , ' I .. + ,. e"" , rr{{�� .:Sr•".J' C i fj}'1, ,,,, ?.;'s it I , F5 a .,-- ',' '^ •"Ci, i � :. e'�,L ! ! `' 5 y�.7 •1 k X#1„i 3V,1 o.r k "t- Ft {y, '' e F 4 4 ' 's Y t` a ] , • • r' x w ��.,:.. .u' 4" f 1 f k t 41vt-r t, :f1 "fi ,./ !'�c 1a ?t' S, }:r . 4. ' :, y, ,14 i : ,I`''' -,"cl ze T!" r ,nr +tt r. f+,,;}'Y• .� ¢'` 1waft +.,14j4.1""v 5"t c- 1 +• '"r rx r. •% - ',a.;. ..7° t ,1„.;', �r t¢t f' '+E# `f r ";'A"i �4'"a&e7�?;,:,- -:'} r fir'., F, ,,4,:,t ! �t. .l , ti iqk, ' , ., Rl ,t. ;h•'t6,7,r.'`4c'* /*'.,,,' 'F '' { i t4 y. , :17j `"' r1 t"'r J„th{:I ti," r tN;4,44,, ,; ti� r".!:N `":rt�•, . f ''r} ,k'f i4 . ,,, ';",i•+�4 '$ fp•,r. . 4 +<IOy, ,.it•t""G., 4 zy y z5 t t [t F`' y 75 5 '1•'s t, g .' � � *r�'S• i" t "�Y �� 4..+,t4 s 5 a'715�� ,I' t� f'�,r'7 �j 1. � r�• It}�".[':a'q to ��. L " r+ '�• by � t a P + t ,•�.! X` y, R'� �w�+'•r{ .� +y:�,il' !� *�' t'?�• � 3•r', �, s +K w 3( 1 �7.7 ,�' J�' i;1 d ,�,, :F�a t Y. "' y;.° a + .. " ,:'' t r r t" d'`• Y t "I' .' 'L ar �r tft 7 '^ 7 • 4"vf3.'a:i 1 E',� '4 k {�� L� r • w i " a f,�]r.1" `x�, �.�` 3{,�,' rr r • a` •ri'•ny�i ,r ti.t... ," .,",tp 7 v.. F* rrry`L'�,i}' i " �,..5 t „'' 1 i• i :4,r•," 1: ` s '�"r,13t:1• •:1'• ',' , `A;."•'t =` do 41: tth" 1�,. .. K F 1 + .i �y *?1",1 *�s '.. "t'� � �. 3• A�°+;k t-. +• ;1'� 1� '�- 1 a t,. "4 ,�"i "��i d'•rM.r 't 't .'t' t� s�,"t �r, arnF�,, �4 n..�y.�"'. '=u.+ " xrieri s r*:to+"r•,}�#!`#� ,r{•`� v •1Y+ni t 1� a ar l^ _."� 1 �} �,�., ! ya•.�r jj r a t x u. m +tz b r`+' +i :A'L s rjri ,t a r. af:t r.", r1tyN % .-A'.7 i n``�}•y+;,�"Y 4. "-s,' r61,1 w'•'4r,1..� ''�+ .1t,r ,, a k., yC s1 ;f'', ,a_! �'' X kit },, ",", t`.,. ! "l ' a F}, `; If" . 1t4, !'+F[,''i 44Ir a 1wr -k,".., '.�,, ,�,Xe{irc` +;. ,Y " Cr ,r,ti;S4{ FT' y.: '1,4ita,dt r'.,O' + "R+` � 7�" .r�,N'.. .�,y- ,, m 7, ",,, ,�� i a, .5 4,. f !. S ,?a '"!' .' (' ,`, ,.wry C5 T t�:t ,l .ay�>•� ��fp. # n."t1rtY}'�,,b ���h a F��.k t:a•,��r.J•� •.^.f`f", ltt .�ryry�,�xt -Pj.�°�1�.Y' � r {.�,•Q� ,Y `t"' { r,"�`� *' ''4+'fig .�t^.�a1y ,f,„�,STp, I �r .� `,r � ' :i I 'i•'- ,' ,v:-' .Pr Nil M x 3. fSry 2,;r Y+' .. I '� ,.t, 3 Vc} •" '; 1 r �t � a' 1 'i"L'+k,s" r i t rr �t �',iC"' I•; i ? }' + : ,~ ,lklf 'is ."'•,{may.�,:'#' 6 S.rjry da `�•1t4 -'yf k, 4+,ta+' S` F 1 �},'�i �;vr'r,,. " .)) � �'�:,t t +:t .f. »` '+'. 1, :.:` 1 f'�X,�t` �' ,}+ x"r!r.�, i�1'$ 1 o, ,"s {C.,,r yw�, J'"fit. 3",, a .'.a�{ 0 , �13, '"`,i• 11ks „,,Ik,ri y'7 F'.5; •'S• " ,r:t1 A''�i 4,.4. vt 4 t"}ir rhw 1,"t',,44 'X'.''�, , krk.1 1 sa� tt � .t•` ��-�,,]��yyA4. IV'�1 `7-� Y��6�. L:1 "{ '�.i 4 t a „" Y r �3".. ill Ik.,. t "'M, ?6 L.. r '. 1, i ':. W - ara ."`^'1' Y • .f� �i .'4 �:rr } 1 ,µ, �a '+�i%. a s n f - ''"`t� r S §1 ,.�� 3 'r s�xr.y o • �:y,a ti t 4'�1"''5�.'r;•F �,i 3'�h` ia:;.>}.'�� t«jx � �.lt � ^iYa .n "� "t�r �'. Tf t f` +..': 1"f *.i•" ,,i• s 7",p . k r. `, ..„I,, n,!:, ", �`A., b�$ ,,. tt �,/-: ;0; ,;,44', ski. . o- ' , ,rii� c', .. - ,r, '.�t :i.#,{" y'�t�,tq,,,t i. },a -t .T a, Jk.` ,}j1 , ,NA 6 1A r,:; Pt i. '+ 3' tr, 4 I.�t"pt" r k �..n' , 3 t a tilt° ., ',1:i'1' _• I #c �� '+;1+. { .k r, �kF f'' .if.A '*'.1 _{ �: hr X " 1-7 i r t h� , r �„ s �¢'n". r�'' , 'f r ;,W 1 C r• ;1, ,4t` aY•t r�17 ���� 17 `''�•n,'�cd �� r' a"� 'S fb �`C r i -d•Y �' ""'{.}Y rr '� �•� r� �t p!I -r r '� :� �° � <'��'p1t•,f� a ,1ra.' „£ 4. i•, t9 h. '' I 'xta y� 74,- 7j 'rr, ,t�'•.�_ a ' 't�.r, -•il:'`IL.i'sr f 't 4. i ck y L r,a .z r`rj 4 q- r h v",t `t . ft": dj, A ':. 'r 4•..'T .{I f; !r� F S�str' 3�t,t��, $, '1�`�- `,.�ri=:,,,,y:at' t•4'd of (,+1' ,fi },10. ip Sli?.,,;,re f 11 ' gym+. _ .r -, ,' q�1,„ ie , •Yi7rf°• i , ii v; st Y re .,r `,r v yt t, t0 ^"F �Sn"'1,'�yt "�*2, �• :�� $,:. �'"`'S` �'r�'�'.�t`"".K r,,. ' r ��g9f'('.�4 .� a. {.v�.t3��y� 1��1 r,�,�}rryy �• �t�t);� s,"y "�'S'r' ..•� �,, 3`r,N ��p;{&�a'•z„ry1j,. '.,{'�.kr, +'.:ri �lr: 1 f .+<` :; �. l a•.Pt�r .,.a9,r'4� :'ti.:r '�,�,� r; :z3. k ,♦,,..,,'S6'Tir' ,t sfi,;W Tky'q`e; ti ,,r ;5r '.e f+3F,:�s'F �'.*?r4 �,"µ',",'�' 1y�+.'.i�' t �r, e 'it?, 4 k,,,I r "r ,r..f ri,•'•,z•,'z,;n"`i.'�t ?,IWA,:l>,..,. ;, o f i ro.r,,y ti a Y.,4 r,-,, . . '. "}F`. '?f3 S.. 1 1._'W'•(i`i J. Y't�i:::' .[n `U� r';"t.r+,.. " - ,. is � �. �i. ��r1�.t'S.yik;'�`xa�S ,1 Jz� 'a r 4a�.. ,,�I.;.:, �i'�'pL`�?„^"�k,�' •°a� t��"`'```'����"r,+�k rr�.sx1Ut, ,;,r":`� �'"�v$t>a•` s•-r "I., '' ?''c. �.� 1jd.L. :;t+r .`>- ''t, r' r"1,,Y�;""� .,,, ar, AyF .i ", t�er { g� S ? nV R:1 '4.*, r , ie'1C J '.. " t, ,i F •, z° 1Y""z ? � t�k�4 1e �l:.d + 4. r. .r * fik''4 d i } (4 a aP":. I, .z� F r .,,t. ..• 'n';4 zt ° 'a" #r f fir¢{- Y iy., , r J5 rr . . . r',}`t"G !' s . t;� •h. ,a r ..,. fin, re: . c,4 , at•.r, i . .s•.F§ • Jc r?Tx i' ;�ti i`;d71." ,F>..vS s, ,; �".t- ""'i., i�,arris'sY r '*at'"��.i�}15,�Tfr,:.(Xt{',a,.,�,.'t"^•..,_,<a-,:,4,�,,,ay.t,ti,,.ti.,.'F:<.t���.a�.•,.ro,.�a!t,�..a.;{usr,�:'{•^`�°'.:$I�•�:r,•r� .,xr„�<T.r:xt..at7 > r,�.�J�Ysne�:,.sn•vrsJ)� T,rn.-,Iar��.: ..., " P1 anni nc f V ,!`i® 12-1 979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT / DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 4 °' r a ice' $a ab. $� e App1 i cati on : S P./eei- 7 1 .� if . v 0 era.— fa'r'z' ___ —:".<51;Yeo efea , 9 0 eil a / Location : �� ►� � e ®a Q ®-damc��i Applicant : f r'-g. 0 -# f TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : if/,2644 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : ' +, Public Works Department , ®C fl 81 1k / + Engineering Division ./Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FO T E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON fir . AT 9: 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YO DE ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE OVI E THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : jwi`�7C L N6iWEEk7/A/G Approved K Approvedel with Conditions Not Approved r I �� �' - ; ��'l•,< L\c -`n /� o , C. 1 1 0 I.. 1,,, !)l'. ,c'e Pei c h,LS i<<-,.`l ull I/ C_.(I "}6 _� M v\0 " 1/i c,i ` , I . /, f 1 , it L, , (/ ?., A "�' p`.7L./,=1r• c ;ZI , -, - . sf«-r t;ri, .(, 7•' , ,rr • ,v,:'/✓j ,, ,1 ao.x(.as. 3a) K 115.8 _ Sd,(757�e /r ; /• `.k. K�, l ,1- l , .1 , - I ,/,,, f,..3 , (7.) :,•.__'(-).,-,r.5. /i Pro/ ' <7� f GtJO / -74 ollq� /d ES ,� lv _ �C ��'/J�/� , .WA51 p ,✓r..., pr G/i c.ic -t— r.J.//[, =yr� ,�r � � yG O , a)7 ` L1 -r * ,_-,a..:J-r'r�{'.F;c 7'�-�� ''el sa...c.,..,n,,,., a.rP n.}.y t9,,�{.�1 F?E�j/-.7�••.J "" Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ' lc--'' , Dat ( I (. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �^-� • • Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved P/ Zia ..0 . .its ,zU d-2-0' Gv--4_t,,_ ceiri-ti ,p4„Z-&;—.."C cam.. 4 Signature of Director or ithorized ep •esentative / Date e,_, 110/47/86) 2 979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT at DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET � p4©�p;�'eA. �5 p®� `' • o44'�c.e use- Application : S, "' 'd ` ei- , ` 1 ir � c s-0. . y0 of "�te- . 'P e VA e Location : , 6' y �,,. 6+. e� X ' `r °A psi a ' �,�gte� Applicant: ° ® ° TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : /// s'/, Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : j , r�.,, �/ .: ) ,� Public Works Department Et:C " ®B ,19e ®�� if�' Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Rr� ?' ,,, c.,- i.A)`/ oBl ing Division /�. c,. � �/ui 4,0<iilities Engineering !• �Jj3 r— Fire Department -- ,-,7 -() (Other ) : , I1//1j� -r ,� COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FO T E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON . 0 AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YO DE ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASWOVI THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �-'° r- Approved v/ Approved with Conditions Not Approved O 4ujccx: LZ Gar// /f/i-'Z /ti/re-57 /FL Pc%-�/ =.0 ____ _______6 l ` ���✓ c-� //�/ ., Signature of Director or A thor ze Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -irur,/ Approved j Approved with Conditions Not Approved SLAW" t'a LbTe— (6dtia1-5 D cillWL-` +-1 °A( 5vrnt56 t & N6 —we73et— I t I( I' &WM., N✓� "IC' - 561'451t ' S--(5-r z wL v015✓. C r-1 Z5 — SL"/6-1 4- "`-WI— k PPS JG15- wo�ct� (Ai)" h)-S wi,e-(6c" ✓-a-(t i,/1:o o( nR- 615Pi cop_ sire ttypau,,rc-S C1:9,03 dree 0. All at____ 7-ac .7; k-- l 3 v Signatur: of C : rector or Authorized Representative Date �, � � A"M Planning a �� j` 12-1979 cio RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT C®�0®��61e A rl DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET e {s 0,41 044 Application : " ® a (s P Location . c. %" Iv y ' 4',m,e` . ��a �%01 ® "Pat ° 0 vaa -{ Applicant : tat,e. t • ' : a' ar c ,� ‹A. _ TO: LAarks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; #174p15 77Police Department A R :, C, MEETING DATE , aI Public Works Department e .°w! g,,, 11)? I � l� B Engineering Division �' } Traffic Engineering 1 Building Division iI Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FO T E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YO DE ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T AITEND THE ARC, PLEAS �?OVI THgovE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0U P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE DEPT. i I Approved XXXX Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1) Should consider making drive-up lane to bank two lanes in width instead of one lane to prevent any traffic back up onto Sunset Blvd. \N.E. 2) LICHTINC in parking lot & on buildings should be d placed F o that it shi in on buildings rather than out on to the street & parking lot . This is a safety measure for both the traffic on the adjoining streets as well as a safety measure for police officers who have to resp 'd to business aft cl ing--Lights directed outward will blind office on approach. Lt.. - 10/28/80 Signat re f Director or Authorized Representative ; Date 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : B • Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved _ . /-10t t Li) l c 7 (:v c!: 772(1: -?{7(7 00 J__) J 1= C/ 4-(fC:-,:e -5.5-1_C / )i ,> 3- cC�'e '&79_' Z041)z'.- 7 -1 Via 4"�/i3 iu c_.(.= ?i.s .Ai c) T % -( '' / / Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Z Plannii 12-197' RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 0 Application : ')=P- 0- 10- 1/40.0” hv to-5 elvit • 7f0 'roe's)*So, ' e Location : © N e . 9 Applicant : ° TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4Zr`t > Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : '``F/ Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FO' ; HE APPLICATION RVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT :UUU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM IF YOUR DE'ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C DC- >( Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ,// Sigr foe Director or Authorized Representative Date / / I — ----- - I REVIEWING• DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE XXXXXXX Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved LT . D .R. PERSSON 12/9/80 C4nnn+iirc of nirector or Authorized Representative Date P1 anni r 12-197S RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : .$ ; fir:" d! ` ' r • /,p ® O i ' :r '%6 �y{® 2e rr.. rno,,A60 s ® Aril Afty30.5021/442 64. 104'0.,:cgH Q Location : Ars-LortnrY"r deS Solag 4,4„c o ";'. oup,d 4 VP. , .� •#'.._. • Applicant.: Ik1Dpt,i, ��� 42-3. TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE 4 ®., Police Department AIR.C, MEETING DATE : MI7/4 Public Works Department r. ngineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division • Utilities Engineering Fire Department • (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FO HE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M, IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DE ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved )X Approved with Conditions Not Approved • /2/VAD Signature of Director or Auttorizedl epe entative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions X Not Approved ,c; 111 ; i �� �.7 I{, \ �T\ / '`` I 0 La, / • tifir d e resentat a Date Signature of Director or Authorize p ':' ! Planni 1 12-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 0 S 6 Jfer,fiCA4 • ® '®��, � �'" .,;� yy�� ,ram y� J Z age*2 ., , .._, . .. ,, ...,....‘ ,, ., ,e'e' t?.,''w, Location : `r( ,EAL��''"-E G, @ • Q.J 0 N ErOD LJA Q 6 irp sr/ cipe• ive Zv-�C Applicant : • TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1,:::) /.`:`C. Police Department A, R. C, MEETING DATE : �pr`` n /// 4 Public Works Department r � , Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Buildng Division f 'ITtilities Engineering h Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FO HE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON _ AT 9:UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DE ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY b A:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /� '''Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved c---__ r -. ...-- Z ....1--- /- „(j"-(_---N \ (-2,__(--- //,%/d/ LP/../ .L Si gnat re of Di rector 'or A f hori zed Representative /ate I 1 REVIEWING, DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ' Approved / Approved with Conditions Not Approved tfil L i t P6,tia 7f3 st5t ate.© Ow,°o.0ro - -- oP 1 iz/84° c AN(:); ' I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . Date FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : SA-104-80 Environmental Checklist No.': ECF-614-80 Description of. Proposal : Small neighborhood shopping center (to include bank and/or restaurant) Proponent : BARBER, KLOPPENBURG, OLDS • Location of Proposal : NE corner of Sunset Blvd. NE and Union Avenue NE Lead Agency : PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on October 29, 1980, following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department . Oral comments were accepted from: Warren Gonnason, Director of Public Works, commented there may be some overflows of storm water runoff. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-614-80 are the following : 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet , prepared by : Steve Munson , Assistant Planner , dated October 27 , 1980 2) Applications : SA-104-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Police, Planning and Building Departments . Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have ,significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 . 21C .030( 2) (c) This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. • Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Subject to available sewer capacity ; additional trip generation and payment of $20/vehicle trip for traffic impact fees . Signatures : u),Aqsi. ,d"opn E . Webley , Pa ks and Gcirdoi Biel en 'creation Di„regtp Planning !rector 4� y vre, Warren C. Gonnason Public Works Director • DATE OF PUBLICATION : Nov . 5 , 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD : November 19 , 1980 OF I Fw ,% �e ) THE CITY OF _',ENTON .K4 ° MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 sea n A BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9A �' 235- 2550 o94TeD SEP� .-��P December 12, 1980 Barber, Kloppenburg, Olds P.O. Box 5171 Lynnwood, Washington 98036 Re: Application for site approval of small neighborhood shopping center (to include bank and/or restaurant) and condominiums or professional offices; file SA-104-80; variance for 10-12 foot rear-yard setback instead of the required 20 feet is also requested, File V-105-80; property located on the northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Union Ave. N.B. Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 17, 1980.. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for December 30, 1980 at 9: 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director t. By: a.c„Le �G;y. 'y-�a�t „ra Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner RJB:wr - cc: .. George Barber, Arthur Beale, Donna Nolan Sy ' • ' S. , '11 4 I Ty GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUNSET BOULEVARD N ,E, AND UNION AVENUE N ,E, • V LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT • S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON _,CEMBER 30, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9:OO A.M. P.M. ' O CE MING ITEM . RElINE • S '1•E " Ja PE ° IT' - ., - SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING IT - CENTER OF SUNSET SQUARE S MNAGEzENT PERM' 'f . VARIANCE FOR 10-12 FOOT REAR-YARD SETBACK; FOUR-LOT SHORT vf, PLAT APPROVAL; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RE, ACCESS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON DECEMBER 30, 1980, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1 . BARBER, KLOPPENBURG, OLDS (SUNSET SQUARE) Application for site approval of small neighborhood shopping center (to include bank and/or restaurant) and condominiums or professional offices; File No. SA-104-80 ; Variance for 10-12 foot rear-yard setback instead of the required 20 feet is also requested; File No. V-105-80; property located on the Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. 2. RICHARD L. KLOPPENBURG (SUNSET SQUARE SHORT PLAT) Application for 4-lot short plat for the future development of the neighborhood shopping center of Sunset Square; File No. Short Plat 116-80; and Exception to the Subdivision Ordinance for access by easement to proposed Lot #2; File No. E-117-80; property located on the Northeast corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. 3. BRAD CUNNINGHAM (MERCURY MARING EXPANSION) Application for site approval and variance to construct a *5.9,800 sq. ft. addition to an existing warehouse; File No. SA-113-80; and Variance to eliminate 5% interior landscaping requirement; File No. V-114-80; property located vicinity of 4060 Lind Avenue S.W. 4 . GERALD E. SCHNEIDER Application for rezone from R-2 to R-3 to allow tenant parking and circulation for the proposed Hilltop Apartments; File No. R-124-80; property located east side of Monroe Avenue N.E. approximately 600 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. 5. GERALD E. SCHNEIDER Application for special permit to allow construction of apartment buildings in the R-2 zone (proposed Hilltop Apartments) , total project to be 158 units; File No. SP-123-80; property located east side of Monroe Avenue N.E. approximately 600 feet north of N.E. 4th Street. Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 30, 1980, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: December 17 , 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the llth day of December, 1980. • SIGNED: "r,..-e /����CT•c.`^''r� OF Rem 44, •® ® THE CITY OF RENTON 41 - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 swim o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 40 Pm• 235- 2550 9�Te0 SEP1°; December 4•, 1980 Mr. Richard L. Kloppenburg Real Estate Development 15404 Northeast . 6th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007 RE: SUNSET SQUARE SHORT PLAT EXCEPTION Dear Mr. Kloppenburg: We have received your letter and are now reviewing the proposal through the various city departments. Our records show that we have not received the exception fee of $100. We are processing the application and anticipate that the public hearing will be held either December 30th or January 6, 1981. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Roger J. B aylock,l Associate Planner RJB;sh OF ) 4-1 ,y 0 THE CITY OF RENTON - `� ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ha BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT °94 235- 2550 o9g7*eD SEP-CE°e$' MEMORANDUM December 2, 1980 TO: OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SUNSET SQUARE SHORT PLAT -- EXCEPTION E-117-80 ACCESS BY EASEMENT The applicants, Barber, Kloppenburg & Olds, have requested an exception to the subdivision ordinance to allow access to proposed Lot 2 by easements over proposed Lots 1 and 3 . All of the lots are part of a neighborhood shopping center presently being reviewed under site approval, SA-104-80. The applicant proposes using a reciprocal cross easement for parking, utilities, ingress and egress to cover all of the paved parking lot areas. This method has been used at both the Redwood Plaza Center in Bremerton and the Alderwood Retail Center in Lynnwood. A copy of the easement format_lis attached. The easement should probably be placed on the face of the short plat. /94/ i/6 a 3 RICHARD L. KLOPPENBURG • , REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT \Q ^' 15404 N.E.6th PL ', tet • ' --a BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98007 4�, �• (206)747-2144 \.� e t E�t{ t November 2LI., 1980 Mr. Roger J. Blaylock City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Sunset Square short plat Dear Roger, • Concerning the short °platting of Sunset Square into four pieces, I would hereby express the reasons for platting the property into four pieces . Financing is the primary reason for asking for the short plat. As we all know, the financial climate has been extremely difficult this past year. With the prime borrowing rate again approaching the "20%" level, - I assume the trend to continue. As a result, if the property is broken into four pieces, financing may be easier to achieve, ie; :. a piece may be sold, such as the bank pad to a local savings and loan or if the entire center should be constructed at different times it may be easier to obtain financing on one portion rather than the entire center at one time. 4/ consequently, it is my understanding that the reciprocal AV easement in question has not been done in the City of t� Renton in the past. Please be advised that reciprocal easements have been done in the past in other municipalities. Please refer to the letter from First Western Properties and also the letter from my engineer Seifert and Forbes. As you can readily see cross easements can be documented in 9 other areas. I hope this information is of use to you, and as always, please feel free to call as questions arise. cer y, ;Pp 1 Richard L. Kloppe. • , g Al -k; 7 • - FIRST �� C� MI WESTERN „K."- .��` :', , i PROPERTIES INC. November 18 , 1980 • ;5 � City of Renton and Mr. Dick Kloppenburg Real Estate Development 15404 N.E. 6th Place Bellevue, Washington 98007 RE: Redwood Plaza Center - Bremerton, Washington Alderwood Retail Center - Lynnwood, Washington Dear Dick, As the owner of several shopping centers, we have used the cross easement approach for parking, utilities, ingress and egress. In as much as some of the uses and form of ownership are unknown at preliminary stages, this method affords the coverage of all possible combinations. The two subject centers operate in this fashion. Regards, FIRST WESTERN PROPERTIES , INC . George Barber GB: 11 P 0 BOX 5171 LYNNWOOD WASH. 9803E (20B) 775-4611 ARCHITECTSSEIFErT AND f°011BES • P L A N N E R S • EN G I , N E E R S 925 TACOMA AVENUE SOUTH, TA COMA, WAS DIN GTON 96402 • 206 • 303 - 1 60I J79047 C(' tl November 19, 1980 � k ` off NOV Z 2p 19 8p City of Renton -.�,.,.. Municipal Building �r ��yy 200 Mill Avenue South \ •�� .c� ,� Renton, WA 98055 G DEPANk. Attn: Mr. Roger Terriere Re: Proposed Short Plat "Sunset Square" Dear Sir: Please find enclosed en example of a typical reciprocal easement agreement. This particular agreement is to facilitate access for a shopping center in Bellingham. Of course the format can be revised to include access, utilities, covenants, etc. This type of agreement is quite common and is used widely throughout the area. We hope this information is of use to you. Please feel free to call as questions arise. Since ly, Terry Larson, .L.S. CC: Mr. Richard Kloppenburg file TL:gj SEIFERT ANU fORBES, P. S. A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION . i1340 103 RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT 2•11".:GA { _THIS Reciprocal Easement Agreement, herein called "REA"is made this • i 5=day of October, 1979, by and between MT. BAKER MUTUAL SAVINGS � BANK, a Washington corporation ("Mt. Baker"), and FIRST CITY INVESTMENTS, 1 INC., a Washington corporation ("F,irst City"). t WITNESSETH: iWHEREAS, First City has or will purchase from Mt. Faker a portion of 1 certain contiguous real property located in the City of Bellingham, County of a Whatcom, State of Washington, and 1 WHEREAS, the land owned or to be owned by First City consists of six 1 separate parcels, more particularly described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto, o, 1 j and hereafter referred to as Parcel I, and 7 :IEREAS, the real property retained or to be retained by Mt. Baker C consists of fo::r separate parcels, more particularly described in Exhibit "B", .ti attached hereto, and hereafter referred to as Parcel LI, and , j WHEREAS, the parties desire that Parcels I and II hereafter shall be i subject to certain reciprocal easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions ` j hereafter set forth. NOW', THEREFORE, the parties hereto for themselves and their successors a.'d assigns do hereby declare, grant, covenant and agree as follows: 1. "The P rope rt}'"as used herein shall mean all of the real property i • described in Exhibits "A" and 'B". 1 Z. The parties hereto hereby grant, each to the other, reciprocal, • i nonexclusive casements appurtenant to Parcels 1 and II for ingress and egress 1 c.f motor vehicles and pedestrians, and the parking of motor vehicles on Parcels 1 : I and LI, for the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective tenants, ! employees and invitees. 1 In addition to the foregoing, the parties hereto hereby grant each tot:e • • other, as the need shall arise, appropriate and proper reciprocal nonexclusi•: j easements appurtenant to Parcels I and II for installation, hook-up, repair an._ 1 replacement of storm drains, utilities, sewers and other services necessary _cr the on:crly development and operation of the property and the buildi:rns to be 1 constractcd on the property. Said easements to be more particularly ?c,:"r,: and documented as the particular situation shall arise in the future. Pro.'.cec• C hrwever, upon the completion of construction or installation of such utilities, r_'^e party causing such construction or installation shall immediately restore the • surface of the property to the condition thereof existing prior to the cnmr^er:t ent or installation sha:i be of s.:c.r construction or installation, and such construction done with minimum interference to the burdened property.rty. �%J� `,�. 1' - 7 E { i s . 4, .. P • No signs, fences or other barriers shall be erected on Parcels I or II t j which would obstruct the ingress, egress or the free flow of pedestrian and t vehicular traffic between Parcels I and II and the buildings to be located thereon. i 3. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the parties hereto agree that First City shall have the right to pave, install sidewalks on, • and/or landscape the westerly sixty feet of Lot 7 (described in Exhibit "B") of the Property; provided, that if First City has not acquired Lot 7 from Mt. Baker, • and if Mt. Baker sells said property to a third party, Mt. Baker shall include in ! the sales price an amount sufficient to reimburse First City for the costs of such • improvements and shall remit such amount to First City at the time the sale to ggF the third party closes. i Mt. Baker agrees not to construct any improvements on Parcel 7 which )j will restrict, prevent, or otherwise adversely affect First City's right or ability to construct building improvements or.Parcel I up to and abutting the westerly i heur.dary of said Lot 7. Mt. Baker further agrees to join with and assist First City in obtaining any necessary governmental approvals, including but not limited i -t to a variance, which may be required in connection with such construction of !! _eild.ng improvements up to and abutting the westerly boundary of Lot 7. Not- t .sitit.taedinc :he provisions of this paragraph, the parties agree that reasonable t 't access between Parcels I and II shall be maintained at all times. ' 4. The parties hereto each agree to pay or cause to be paid, prior to }- delinquency, directly to the appropriate taxing authorities, all real property fjg taxes and assessments which are levied against their respective parcels. k All of the Property shall be maintained by and at the expense of the owners of c•ar.hr pa reel in good condition and repair, said maintenance to include, without r t limiting the generality of the foregoing, removing all papers, debris, filth and r refuse to the extent reasonably necessary to keep the area in a clean and orderly f • cendttion. i i. The parties hereto shall each indemnify and save the other harmless f from any and all liability, damage, expenses, causes of action, suits, clairu.s 4 cr just nients arising from injury to person or property and occurring on the parcel owned by it, except if caused by the act or neglect of the other party, or i said other party's agents or employees during the course of their employment. ! b. The easements, restrictions, benefits and obligations hereunder shall create mutual covenants, benefits and servitudes upon all portions of the O Property running with the land. This Agreement shall create privity of contract and estate with and among the parties hereto, their respective heirs, represent- ) arises, successors and assigns. Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to be i • a gift or dedication of any portion of the Property to the general public or for any ,,-a • uurpese whatsoever, it being the intention of the parties hereto that the public F shall have no rights in or to the Property or in this Agreement. t i 1 l' -2- a , i eta 9 , .nl ar:i: v on A 1, li . ' . lb • . . . . ... . . . , . • . . . . . .• .• . .. ._. _ ... ....._________________,...................,..,,,,..........,.........._ . 7. The provisions of this Agreement may bo abrogated. modified, rescinded or amended, in whole or in part, only with the consent of all of the fee owners of the Property by Agreement in writing, executed and acknowledged , by all of said parties, duly recorded in the county in which the Property is I located. This Agreement may not otherwise be abrogated, modified, rescinded 1. or amended, in whole or in part. 8. Nothing herein shall be construed to give any fee owner of the Property any interest in any award or payment made to any other fee owner in connection with any exercise of the right of eminent domain or transfer in _ie_ thereof, regardless of whether the right of eminent domain or transfer in lieu thereof affects said other fee owner's parcel or gives the public or any 1 gavernmcnt any rights in Parcels I or II, it being agreed that in the event of such exercise of eminent domain or transfer in lieu thereof of any part of the Property that the award attributable for the taking of any land and improvements of such portion of the Property shall be payable only to the fee owner thereof and no claim thereof shall be made by the owners or tenants of any other portion of _ • `t the Property; provided, however, that all such other fee owners of the Prcperty may file collateral claims with the condemning authority over and above the value / .rt of the land area and improvements so taken. It is further agreed that the fee owner of each portion of the Property so condemned shall promptly repair and `l restore the remaining portion of the Property so owned as near as practicable _ to the condition of the same immediately prior to such condemnation or transfer. Ih WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereby set their hands 1 the day and year first above written. MT. BASER MUTUAL SA VIINGS BANK 1 1 l Ih _ r FIRST CITY INVESTMENTS, LNC. , i. r -r9 ) 11• ' �r'. 0 _ C1:3 Pc' fit C 0? :`, s r' b !" ---' " y ' III iip CITY OF RENTON -_/ ,/ SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. //e' -' io MAJOR PLAT OF R A,N. DATE REC' D!�• '�'/1 /�� TENTATIVE R� �P!'�D ®\ APPLICATION FEE $ PRELIMINARY1 ENVIRONMENTAL NOV 21 :1 REVIEW FEE $ FINAL RECEIPT NO. \"7 .... / SM NO. N I'G DEV91�� PUD NO. '',*_,ems APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : 1. Plat Name & Location SUNSET SQUARE N.E. corner of Union and Sunset Highway, Renton, WA 2 . No. Lots 4 Total Acreage 148 , 000 Sq.Ft2oning R-1 & 1:2-3 3 . Owner Richard L. Kloppenburq Phone - 74-7-2144 Address 15404 - N.E. 6th Pl. Bellevue, WA 98007 5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed Telephone ( X ) ( ) ( ) Electric ( X ) ( ) ( ) Street Lights ( X ) ( ) ( ) Natural Gas ( X ) ( ) ( ) TV Cable ( X ) ( ) ( ) 6 . Sanitation & Water: ( X ) City Water ( X ) Sanitary Sewers ( X ) Water District No . ( ) Dry Sewers ( ) Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 8 . DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION: TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED APPEALED EXPIRED 10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : DATE DATE BOND NO. AND TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . Rep. 1/77 41011 AFFIDAVIT 411, ` 4)r//A 1,-, (r- ISD am the I, (George Barber) contract purchaser , being duly swo �nj declared t I am the owner .of .the property involved in this application a d? *—tTVth-e foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 3 day of November I 1980 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing atAlderwood Manor . • 2v2.4.!'e-,/1 CYO L' (Nai{ie of Notary Pu1blic) (Signvure of-Owner) • J George Barber 3209 171st P1. S.W. P.O. Box 5171 • (Address) (Address) Lynnwood, WA 98036 (City) (State) (206) 775-4611 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: • Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 Ill (1111 -,- fli: DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS A. PT/PP 'I' WHEREAS , the owners of the following real proper y in the Gi y oaf NOV Renton, County of King, State of Washington, describ iias . fol ues6' 9 'mow,. )/11That portion of the southwest quarter of the sou • est .quarte'r. Section 3, Township 23 North , Range 5 East, W.M. , KO/ ing Cpu% ,,y, Wa, described as follows : Dpj,\R ` Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision; 'tWence north 89-24-22 east along the northerly line there of 372. 37 feet ; thence south 1-10-21 east 534. 00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 1-10-21 east 498. 16 feet, more or less , to the northerly line of primary state highway #2 ; thence westerly along said northerly line to the easterly line of the westerly 30 feet in width of said subdivi- sion; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning; thence north 89-24-22 east parallel with the northerly line of said subdivi- sion 340 . 37 feet, more or less , to the true point of beginning ; EXCEPT road. WHEREAS , the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the pro- perty, " desire to impose the following restrictive covenents running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : EASEMENTS A. Owner hereby grants an easement to use all of those portions of the Shopping Center designated as common areas , parking areas and drive- ways , for the benefit of a new owner , the Lessee , invitees , licensees , assigns , subtenants , and patrons in common with all other tenants of the Shopping Center. B . Owner hereby grants a non-exclusive easement to use portions of the Shopping Center as may reasonably be required now or in the future for the installation, maintenance and repair of sewer, water, gas , electric and drainage utilities and related facilities . If any of the aforemen- tioned utilities are supplied, installed or otherwise controlled by the owner, owner grants the right to use coupled with its easement said utili- ties and related facilities ; and owner covenants and agrees to maintain the utility lines in good condition and repair. C . In the event that other parties acquire fee title to the demised premises , the easements and right to use the utility lines and related facilities herein conveyed shall be perpetual. D. In the event fee title passes from the owner, the purchaser agrees to grant the identical rights granted as outlined in this agreement . MAINTENANCE OF PARKING AND COMMON AREAS Owner shall maintain and repair the entire parking and common areas . The obligation on the part of owner to maintain said parking and common areas in good condition and repair shall , without limiting the generality thereof, include the following: \ a) Maintainingthe surfaces in a level, smooth and evenlycovered \condition with the type of surfacing material originally installed or of similar quality , use and durability; \j Page One of Two 1 `1 1111/ b) Removing all papers , debris , snow, ice, filth and refuse and thoroughly sweeping the areas to the extent reasonably necessary to keep said areas in a neat, clean and orderly condition; c) Placing , keeping in repair, and replacing any necessary appro- priate direction signs , markers and lines ; and operating, keeping in re- pair and replacing when necessary such artificial lighting facilities as shall be reasonably required; d) Maintaining any perimeter walls in good condition and state of repair; e) Maintaining all landscaped areas , making such replacements of shrubs and other landscaping as is necessary , and keeping said areas at all times adequately weeded, fertilized and watered . ENDINGI . OF FILE FILE TI T L E