Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA78-132 f i4 / i2 `-� DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CD WHEREAS , Cr.+2dC �LO�� C.`� tJ. •�L,� 5►-1�1�; are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as Exhibit ' A ' attached hereto . WHEREAS , the owner ( s ) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to ' use , present and future , of the above described real property . • NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owner( s ) hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs , and' assigns .as follows : INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner( s ) of the above described property , their suc- cessors , heirs and assigns , hereby agree and covenant to participate i n , sign a petition in support of , and accept any future Local Improvement District ( LID) or city initia- ted proposal , and 'pay their fair share therefore , for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the ,Renton Subdivision Ordinance . Said improve- ments shall include but, may not be limited to the installa- ti • on of curbs , gutters , sidewalks , street paving , sanitary • sewers , storm sewers , undergrounding of utilities , 'and street lighting . These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9- 1105 ( 6 ) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton . Swd LE SU RV E Y Y" 3L�.,..� P ° 9 9 • PP-fsy7 ' • Cy a. /V W DURATION W These covenants shall run with the land and expire on • r 3 46� December 31 , 2025 . If at any. time improvements are • ? installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of . o the covenants pertaining to the specific installed . impr: - g CCD ca ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rent.oq+ CO shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . _ �- Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be 0.a • enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King CO County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining cs4 subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . C Cam' " c • 6„0) ii27(6Ze-i4:2/1 (' �J. • , STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of c � � , 1977 , before me personally appeared he J , ,(-_.40 ) 0 ),,� ' 9 ! the person ( s ) who executed the within 'and foregoing instrument , and • acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and. deed of said person ( s ) .for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first . above written . 0{..e ,1.71 Notary bl i c in and for theme tate n of Washington , residing at (c,� �.o., • • PP /32 -?2 (r-! Jd- / O Memorandum: �,�+��13141SI�,�j Mr . Michael L. .Smith, o� /� Associate Planner, k, r 9,4) �� P annin Department N. C . <� c� Department, City of Renton Washington . �lF� y >� Dear Mr. smith; Ref : V.in,7 ,tar Preliminary I:1 tom- � 02 L� There is furnished to ou 2 co 4 !C , �tic"� j pies of the Recorded Exhibit ��-�' Covenants, Restriction and Reservations, iertaing to the referenced Preliminary Plat, for your information and file . I have mailed copies of the Recorded Exhibit (E) to Mr. George Oberhol'bzer for his information and to ;r'ive to Mr. i1`ayne E. Chastain who prepared the Preliminary Plat . Very Truly Yours f`�,�: T. , f � e-e--,.,e-FCCiy/^� t.i(i.X1 -1 C �(`,.. /76. ,lFillit�°I( ; of Recorded Exhibit (E ) Lowell C. ' `einber . ,� t C V r lJ y a .,/ �` . `' DEPP ,r r ,'+r • i 1r tgy Y } •t k. tr,'4 •,F r ;3 4 A ,K,t, ;,F`- YS 7? , r !r r ,i, h'� r •jam #' ,. '.i • :r '1 e yr iw't' '' Sir C T tAk t, d ' t t'�l , t�to '` ;et':v a 4 r t ") ..,X*1.,.:, „._ .3' # ;7` r tt'• r�sf •A�� t�r ` r ? 'r' • ,. 1' ^t I., 1:45} FrCk\ t '�4 f '' :trt rs ,1•y Z rt i t M 4' r ,-au'c a1,t • 'i , :c? [ Sihek A, 7 A/ t t1� 4 {if id { 5 ;. tl 4n•++k2r.0"x n e•rr�a[�.k• fi. •• rs a' � T 11 � i .. : ;itT +N� r .T1. 3 y f#f} R 7,y. v t a• 4' v'`1. k/q?, " tt ' 4'" # S' ,$.L-'* ya ` 'k h r r' „ r} , I r4 E k,e..r ?�'4 ,r,:'t •} - t` ,. 4:,!` 'l 5# „fit ,, ", 'r `a ro rStct� 4.v') e :x 6c P u r 4s rF q � it .c a s k.,�i tt duiY r .S �•; t % �� tiFa � � I,?,�t�fir•'£t,s fir r ? i• Exhibit (r+) Renton,2 «in '%ou t , Union Covenants, Restrictions and Reservations. The premises shall be subject to the easements, restrictions and reservations of record, and farther shall be subject to restrictions Lf) if) and reservations which are to be included in the deed of conveyance 0 CD herein as follor:s ; CD (1) There is to be a ten (10' ) foot screening easement at the CV CD rear of all lots, no structure is to be built, or placed in the ten (101 ) 00 N foot easement area. (2) The property is to be used exclusively for residential purposes, single family homes, having a minimum of three bedrooms, with attached two car garage, a minimum of F0URTEF N HUNDRED square foot of living area, exclusive 'of the garage area, and having a minimum of one full bathroom, and one half bath. No mobile homes will be permitted. (3). No accumulation of inoperative automobiles, recreation vehicles, or trucks, or the components thereof, or other junk .will be permitted. (4) Any dwelling or structure erected or Placed on any lot shall be completed as to external a_aperance, including the finished painting, within nine months from date of commencement of construction and shall be connected to public sewer. (5) No animals, livestock, or poultry or any kind shall be raised, bred, or kept on any lot, except that dogs, cats, or other household pets may } e keot in 2nmol_ianee with existing. laws and regulations and provided. that they are not kept, bred, or maintained for commercial purposes . The foregoing is intended to exclude the keeping of any pets, such as dogs, or cats, or birds, in numbers under conditions reasonably objectionable, in the closely-b '1 F sidential community. /�, February 1^ lo�'<? � RECEIVED '� � MAR 1978 _ G DEY ?P- i3a Renton City Council 4/17/78 Page 2 Old Business - Continued :Community Services Community Services Committee Chairwoman Thorpe announced public Committee Report hearing May 11 , 1978, 7:30 p.m. by the Community Services Committee Public Hearing and three King County Council Members (Ruby Chow, Gary Grant and w/King County Mike Lowry) regarding application for Open Space by Victoria Park Council Members Re Homeowner' a Association for five parcels of property within Victoria Victoria -Park Park Subdivisions No. 1 , 2, and 3. Councilwoman Thorpe announced Open Space ' her alternate, Earl Clymer. (File OSC-108-77) ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke submitted committee Committee Report report recommending second and final reading of an ordinance rezon- Ordinance #3220 ing property located at SW 16th St. abutting Longacres Trailer Alhadeff Rezone Park, from G to T. (First reading 4/10/78) Following reading , it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES . CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA. Letter from Mayor Delaurenti appointed James J. Bryant to the posi- Appointment tion of Police Officer in the Renton Police Dept. effective 4/17/78 Police Officer subject to the customary six-month probationary period. The letter noted Mr. Bryant has been certified and accepted by the Civil Service Commission and LEOFF Retirement System. Council concur. Police Department- Letter from Police Chief Darby requested Council authorization for Travel Lab Technician John Iwasaki to attend the 1978 International .Associa- tion for Identification Conference at Portland, Ore. 5/18-20/78. also requesting advance travel funds; item included in 1978 Budget. Council concur. Police Department Letter. from Police Chief Darby requested Council authorization for Travel four officers, Sgts. Evans , Magula, Ritchie and Saude, to attend the "Officer Survival : Psychological Stress Factors" Seminar at Moses Lake 5/18-20/78; also requesting approval for advance travel in amount of $150 which was included in 1978 Budget. Council concur. Proclamantion Proclamation of Mayor Delaurenti declared 4/23-29/78 as Renton Secretaries Week Secretaries Week and 4/26 as Secretaries Day. Council concur. Preliminary Plat Letter from Hearing Examiner Beeler :,resented Preliminary Plat Oberholtzer - 132-78 and Exception 137- 78 George Oberholtzer - Wind Star, recom- Wind Star mending approval with condi t i uns . Cuunc i i concur in L.. ann ncr' s recommendation. (No Legislative action needed at this time. ) Court Case Superior Court Casc No. 843623 filed by Washington State Council of Local 21R vs City County and City Employees, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, and its Local 21R vs . City of Renton and Charles J. Delaurenti , Mayor to proceed to arbitration pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement regard- ing the employment matter of Jolly Sue Baker, based on the various affidavits and the 21R Agreement. Refer to Administration and Litt' Attorney. Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA Approval ITEMS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. (Includes above six items ) CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Park and Recreation Director Webley requested extension Employment of employment for Albert Rosenstrom, Maintenance Custodian , scheduled Extension Beyond for retirement 9/1/78. The letter noted Mr . Rosenstrom as highly Age 65 qualified and to the best interest of the City to prolong nis employ - ment, and recommended the employee be retained in hopes that the retirement age would be extended to 70 years in the near future. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHiNPOCH, COUNCIL REFER MATTER TO WAYS_AND MEANS COMMITTEE. Substitute motion by Thorpe, Second Shane, concur in recommendation and extend employment. SUBSTITUTE MOTION FAILED. \1\1 \ ' Upon inquiry, City Attorney Warren noted resolution requires showing of hardship. Upon inquiry, Park and Recreation Director Weoley advised Mr. Rosenstrom has been with the City for five years and request would build up sufficient retirement. MCTI%i. CARRILD TO REFER TO COMMITTEE. OF4 v �� • z THE CITY OF RENTON Q ., MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 z o p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'O �Q L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 O,QolED SEPI°4O March 29, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. PP-132-78, E-137-78; George Oberholtzer - Windstar. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced preliminary plat and exception requests, dated March 22, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on April 5, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on April 6, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on April 17, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Si rely L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment \tb 910 11,a1/ 0IA. �QQ` c.BAN" ,`\k Sc`c C2 ,LLB March 22, 1978 OFFICE OF THE- AND USE HEARING, _BAUER C I_L` OLREE01. • ":', REPORT' AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: George Oberholtzer - Windster FILE NO. PP-132-78 E-137-78 e 'e..eLOCATION: Property located along the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 100 feet south of N.E. 24th Street, south of ' Glencoe Division No. 5-and west of Glencoe Division No. 2. eeee ,SUMMARY: OF REQUEST: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval for a proposed . fourteen. (14) lot single family residence subdivision and e an exception. to the Subdivision Ordinance limiting the , .e , • '',length of cul-de-sacs to a.maximum of 500 feet in length. • . SUMMARY 'OF Planning, Departmenti Approval with conditions. ::.RECOMMENDATION.: ' , Hearing Examiner: •. Approval with conditions. PLANNING 'DEPARTMENT - The Planning' Department staff. report was received by the :e..REPORT: Examiner on .March 1, .1978-: - PUBLIC HEARING, After is reviewing 'thePlanning.;.Department report, examining available information ,on'file`with the application, and ' field checking the property and surrounding area, the . : Examiner conducted a=public hearing on the subject as • follows:. ee . The. hearing was opened-on: March 7,. 1978. at 9c25 a.m. in, the• Council Chambers of the `Renton Municipal'Building: :' ' - ' ' ' ` ' .';,Partie's,wishin,g to testify ,were,sworn. ` .'',It was', reported that the, Hearing ,Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed , • , ' ''1the 'Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit' #1. ,Michael 'Smith; Planning `Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: ' . • Exhibit #2c' • King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Preliminary Plat Map ' . Exhibit #4:. Ex :'King County Water District 107 Service . '' Agreement for May Creek Storm Water Management . Exhibit' #5:'.2 Restrictive Covenants, received March 3, 1978 Exhibit #6:' S.torm and Street Profile Exhibit #7:.: Letter from Wayne E. Chastain, dated February 21, , 1978,' regarding, request for exception . - ,'Referencing Section 0:3 of Exhibit #1; Mr. 'Smith noted that. with the exception of the property to the south, the' proposal is,consistent with surrounding developments. He corrected Section 0.8; first line, ". : :660 feet longer. . ." to .read ". . .100 to 150 feet '• longer. . . ". Regarding Section.0.12, Mr.• Smith noted that because of the narrow width between the paved area and the property l'ine'at the extreme end of the cul-de-sac, the • department had recommended that the sidewalk be located adjacent to the curb to allow e a, suitable buffer of'landscaping and evergreen trees to be provided between the ; .proposed development and the neighboring,.residences. He stated his request that the matter be reviewed by the Examiner ui;less it,.was determined that an exception request ,was necessary for the'dev.iation: He reported an addition by the Utility Division to ' ''Exhibit #3 of an 'additional Manhole on N.E.' 22nd Place, and advised that service charges eye .znd latecomer fees resulting from the development of Glencoe No.. 5 will he further • . investigated with the Public Works Department. He also indicated departMental concurrence in' Exhibits #4 and #5 as ;submitted. (I pF R� 4) 0;10z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 z o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 odP4TED SE PT��O April 6, 1978 Mr. George Oberholtzer 1439-143rd Place S .E. Renton, WA 98055 • RE: File No. PP-132-78 & E-137-78; Windstar. Dear Mr. Oberholtzer: This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner' s report of March 22 , 1978 , have not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is being forwarded to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for information and review. You will be notified of any action of the City Council regarding this matter, although adoption of an ordinance will not occur until after review of the final plat application. Sincerely, 1 (:.Th4.) L. Rick Beeler I", Hearing Examiner cc : City Clerk EtA .► THE CITY OF RENTON av MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 4 �� L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 04"T ED SE PIE�3 March 29, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No, PP-132-78, E-137-78; George Oberholtzer - Windstar. Dear Council Members: • Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced preliminary plat and exception requests, dated March 22, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on April 5, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on April 6, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on April 17, 1978. • If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the.undersigned. Sin rely,2 • I L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachment I AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 23rd day of March , 19 78 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this o?3 hdday of >774--s_a...4) 19 77 . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: George Oberholtzer - Windstar; PP-132-78, E-137-78 (The minute's contain a tizt o6 the pantLa necond) f • March 22, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON • REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, • APPLICANT: George Oberholtzer - Windstar FILE NO. PP-132-78 E-137-78 LOCATION: Property located along the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 100 feet south of N.E. 24th Street, south of Glencoe Division No. 5 and west of Glencoe Division No. 2. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval for a proposed fourteen (14) lot single family residence subdivision and an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance limiting the length of cul-de-sacs to a maximum of 500 feet in length. • SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 1, 1978. • PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining • available information on'file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 7, 1978 at 9:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Departments report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Preliminary Plat Map Exhibit #4: King County Water District .107 Service Agreement for May Creek Storm Water Management • Exhibit #5: Restrictive Covenants, received March 3, 1978 • Exhibit #6: Storm and Street Profile • • Exhibit #7: Letter from Wayne E. Chastain, dated February 21, 1978, regarding request for exception Referencing Section 0.3 of Exhibit #1, Mr. Smith noted that with the exception of the property to the south, the proposal is consistent with surrounding developments. He . corrected Section 0.8, first line, ". . .660 feet longer. . . " to read ". . .100 to 150 feet longer. . . ". Regarding Section 0.12, Mr. Smith noted that because of the narrow width between the paved area and the property line at the extreme end of the cul-de-sac, the department had recommended that the sidewalk be located adjacent to the curb to allow a suitable buffer of landscaping and evergreen trees to be provided between the proposed development and the neighboring residences. He stated his request that the matter be reviewed by the Examiner unless it was determined that an exception request was necessary for the deviation. He reported an addition by the Utility Division to Exhibit of an additional manhole on N.E. 22nd Place, and advised that service charges • and latecomer fees resulting from the development of Glencoe No. 5 will be further investigated with the Public Works Department. He also indicated departmental concurrence in Exhibits #4 and #5 as submitted. PP-132-78 Page Two E-137-78 The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Wayne Chastain Townsend & Chastain, Associates 409 S. 3rd Avenue Kent, WA 98031 Mr. Chastain indicated his concurrence in the report. He advised that the storm drainage system design as well as calculations for storm drainage and retention had been submitted to the Public Works Department and utility connection would be made to the plat of Glencoe No. 2 on the east,side of the property. He concurred in requirements established in restrictive covenants for provision of a 10-foot screening easement along all rear lot lines on the north, east and south boundaries for the purpose of providing privacy to adjacent residences, and reported the applicant's intent to provide a well-planned development which would be an asset to the area. The Examiner asked for testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. Mr. Chastain asked for clarification of Exhibit #4, and Mr. Smith reported that the Storm Water Management Agreement for the May Creek Drainage Basin required signatures from all property owners in the area to agree to participate in future storm drainage local improvement districts if they are deemed necessary. He provided a copy of the agreement to Mr. Chastain. Regarding proposed improvements along Union Avenue N.E. south from Glencoe No. 5, Mr. Chastain asked Mr. Smith to interpret ownership responsibility for the proposed improvements. Mr. Smith noted the location of the proposed improvements in relationship with the proposed plat and Glencoe No. 5, and the Examiner advised that 1 because Tract A owned by Mr. Lowell Weinberg had been included in the plat of Glencoe No. 5, the matter of responsibility for improvements was a private matter and not germane to the subject of the public hearing. Regarding recommendations specified in Section 0.12 and P.5 of Exhibit #1 relating to location of the proposed sidewalk adjacent to the curb, the Examiner asked Mr. Smith to explain how the recommendation interfaced with the 10-foot screening requirement. Mr. Smith felt that a 10-foot screening requirement would preclude the necessity for the proposed revision in location of sidewalks because it would provide sufficient buffer for vehicle headlights between the traveled area between the cul-de-sac and adjacent properties to the north. ' The Examiner asked Mr. Chastain if the 10-foot landscape easement on the rear of all lots extended across the northern tip of .the cul-de-sac. Mr. Chastain was uncertain that the width of the easement would accommodate a 10-foot landscape buffer in addition to other proposed improvements because of the narrow width at the terminus of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Smith advised that the proposed sidewalk would utilize five feet, and noted that a requirement for a cyclone fence imposed during approval of Glencoe No. 5 should be reviewed in relationship to compatibility with the proposed landscaped area at the northern end of the cul-de-sac. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if provisions in the Subdivision Ordinance would normally require installation of sidewalks on both sides of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Smith responded affirmatively and noted the possibility existed to eliminate the requirement for sidewalks at the extreme end because lots did not radiate from the terminus and access was not required abutting the cul-de-sac. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if the Subdivision Ordinance allowed the Examiner flexibility to deviate from the ordinance without an application for exception. Mr. Smith indicated that although the ordinance did not contain specific recommendations regarding such flexibility, he noted certain circumstances, such as instigation by the staff and not the applicant, to allow for deviation for certain design specifics. He referred to Section 4-3010. (B) , Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance, which states that the Examiner may recommend or require such conditions and modifications to applications as are necessary to ensure compatibility with the environment and carry out the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance and other ordinances of the city. Mr. Smith felt that an interpretation of the ordinance may be necessary by the City Attorney, and noted that testimony had been received at the public hearing regarding the matter to enable the Examiner to review the alternative if the procedure was determined possible. The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he had further questions. Mr. Chastain indicated his concurrence in the revision to eliminate sidewalks at the terminus of the cul-de-sac and stated his preference for a 10-foot landscape buffer at that location. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for additions, corrections or revisions to Exhibit #1. Mr. Smith noted the previously discussed •revision to Section P.5 relating to the proposed sidewalks at the extreme end of the cul-de-sac which would include a provision to expand the planter area. He suggested that the Engineering Division as well as the City Attorney , 1 F_ / 4 • PP-132-78 Page Three E-137-78 be contacted regarding review of the matter. The Examiner advised that although the public hearing on this matter would be closed, memoranda clarifying the Examiner's scope of authority in the matter of revising sidewalk and buffer configurations would be transmitted to the Public Works Department and the City Attorney, and responses to these inquiries would be incorporated into the final decision on the application. He asked Mr. Chastain if he concurred in the proposal. Mr. Chastain indicated his concurrence. The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there werecnone, the hearing on Item #PP-132-78 and E-137-78 was closed by the Examiner •t 10:10 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of the preliminary plat of 14 single family lots and an exception for a 660-foot cul-de-sac. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, (is uncontested) , and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required lot area and lot dimension of Sections 4-729(G) , 4-706(R-1) , and 9-1108.23.F of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. Off-site improvements have not been deferred by the Board of Public Works per Sections 9-1106. 3.H and 9-1108.21. 9. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates single family land use for this area. 10. The proposed right-of-way and street improvements meet the requirements of Section 9-1108.7. 11. Off-site improvements in Union Avenue N.E. are required for that portion adjacent to the proposal. In the development of the plat of Glencoe Division No. 5 to the north off-site improvements include Tract A, Mr. Weinberg's property. 12. A storm water drainage plan has been submitted to the Public Works Department. 13. Restrictive Covenants were submitted (Exhibit #5) . 14. According to testimony and Exhibit #1 an alternative to the long cul-de-sac exists. The cul-de-sac could be made conforming to the 500-foot limit of Section 9-1108.7.K. , but this would create at least two pipestem lots accessing to the end of the cul-de- sac. 15. Property frontage along Union Avenue N.E. is 286.5 feet which would permit two lots (80-foot width each - Section 9-1108.23.F. (b) ) and two streets (50-foot width each - Section 9-1108.7.H) with 26.5 feet remaining. This configuration would provide a loop road to serve most of the property. Access is prohibited to the east and north by existing development of Glencoe Divisions No. 2 and 5. Three separate properties are located south of the site, through which the applicant testified of access in that area being "unfeasible" (Exhibit #7) . PP-132-78 Page Four • E-137-78 16. No other points of access to the property exist except from Union Avenue N.E. 17. On some portions of the site exist substantial trees. 18. The street names should be changed to N.E. 22nd Place (formerly N.E. 22nd Street) and Vashon Court (formerly Union Court) . 19. Exhibit #3 includes a 10-foot screening easement around the perimeter of the site, except for the easterly boundary of Tract A, westerly boundary along Union Avenue N.E. , and northerly boundary adjacent to the end of the proposed cul-de-sac. 20. A distance of approximately ten feet separates the end of the cul-de-sac from the northerly property line abutting Glencoe Division No. 5. Section 9-1108.7 requires that within this distance be constructed a five-foot sidewalk and four-foot planter strip. Exhibit #3 shows compliance with this requirement. Staff recommended that the sidewalk be deleted along this portion of the cul-de-sac and replaced by additional landscape screening.. According to the attached memorandum of March Zl , 1978 from the City Attorney, the Examiner is prohibited from reviewing the recommendation unless an exception application has been filed and heard. No such application has been submitted. 21. The agreement with King County to participate in the May Creek Drainage Program has ' not been signed, similar to Glencoe No. 5. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives and Land Use Map. 2. The proposal appears to serve the public interest, health, safety and welfare (Section 9-1106.2.E. (2) ) . 3. Except for the length of the cul-de-sac; the plat conforms to Chapter 11 and zoning requirements. 4. Existing vegetation on the site should be retained as much as possible to implement the proposed 10-foot perimeter screening easement (Exhibit #3) and to be included in the lots. 5. This property configuration is unusual in its constraints imposed upon the configuration of the access road. However, it was not demonstrated that this "special physical" circumstance ". . .would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use or development of his land. . . " (Section 9-1109.1.A) . Use or development is possible with a different configuration of the lots and access road that may require less of an exception request from the length of the cul-de-sac. However, it is obvious that these other alternatives would only create the need for an exception to allow pipestem lots. Of the two exceptions, in this instance, the long cul-de-sac appears more appropriate in terms of producing a more typical subdivision which is more consistent with the pattern of adjacent development. No testimony was presented that the exception is necessary to preserve the applicant's rights and privileges (Section 9-1109.1.B) . That the exception would not be a detriment to the public or other properties was not shown (Section 9-1109.1.C) . However, it appears clear that in this instance detriment or injury would not occur. Therefore, it seems reasonable and appropriate to grant the exception as requested. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the recommendation of the Examiner that the City Council approve the preliminary plat of. Windstar subject to: 1. Installation of off-site improvements. 2. Approval of the storm drainage plan by the Public Works Department. 3. Changing the street names to N.E. 22nd Place and Vashon Court. 4. Signing of May Creek Drainage Basin Service Agreement (Exhibit #4) . / PP-132-78 Page Five E-137-78 5. Retention of as many of the significant trees as possible. Removal of trees is to be coordinated with and approved by the Planning Department. 6. Implementing these conditions in or before the final plat application. Furthermore, it is the decision of the Examiner to approve the requested exception to allow a 660-foot cul-de-sac. ORDERED THIS 22nd day of March, 1978. • C L. is eeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of March, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Wayne Chastain, 409 S. 3rd Avenue, Kent, WA 98031 George Oberholtzer, 1439 143rd Pl. S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 22nd day of March, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C.' Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director . Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney • Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be 'filed in writing on or before April 5, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors in law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior. hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action a& he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires, that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be • purchased at cost in said office. , • • , .i. 1,,. -- T -! --- - ---- ' . 0 ' , 597 401 404 4011 i I____ _i_____ No •(:•,.-v--.; , . litiVOk'A i . / 'elf', umirg --; Slueee,'- • :,1----,r. • •, • skro• , , ,,. , „ ..3„.,....•_!1 , • , ,,,,,,.,,,,I,T,.t., r ill . : McCrt . , 1-- '--- ---- - --- . ..,,, s„. -,.-1-, 1.24ja, : .... . . . . .. , ' -iiilifil: - -,,,-. -)/ •'• -.I,- '..,i•:•v-'. •'•'• ill 74-0.-r.T.]: wi .', •.fr .‘,-,' .' -I- i i-OIL iY2L.1, t4fLJ,I , ,T. , ;10At-.1 1 #iir j:,..': ,•& ,1A4• , ! 1 • .h . P'•'• • t .../..!.1..;i:1_ili. ' , •1_:122 .,71.'1 _J ‘.'1,..1 • ','10.. '1.,'.1r- 5 4- t -7-. ,- '- - 2-.--- . •-` • '- ' - li :. ;iii:1;-" G . ,,, ,„•am siva - - - n -,. • '!,,-, ', % 1 i-A'%f ' V• ril.. i b ,a_—_ a a to C t., • 4 • • ..4,a \ Ltit i ., Ae+ 1.1.1 44 ay.„ 1 I ,I.••4" 1 \ I .' . '• ' P.Ortr,4.75Ca p'ar•C r k.. : VI It- L,-1 n 1_: ,I 4 pisuieA1411 Ad5 kt" - - ' t I ' : - •T . ; -...., da---Al=- AV'/et,;tt 7: um'pp ium-sir it I 1 ks I ‘1)436itimt. :4,111:r • :;.11 Z- \ ‘ ' g? .. _I W), Lc?, ! ; ,„)1,, .1iPterewb -.''. ' 11p4k/N I 1 44 ,_,_!_,I4 7 _ .!la 14.1 as re,,,!•,t 4 3.6 1• i $ 4 '•N ' ‘' 13 I it: 1 7 ' 7: !:,aciitiefiamita.:11•.emp - ' - ' I _, air swap go , __,.....------- 11 . ir__----------. ' i ,.:1?.....'iii$iii.g: . ::::' - G li.'2.*: R-3 . A-00;n r--, ‘, .' -, . • v .. ....... ... ... , ......r. ....:::::::i:::. i*i; ;i1...:.:.:,•:.::::::::: .:.. :.:.:.?,.".",..!..r,::::::::-. • '::• . ', , 2 . , : : , • 4----1 .,_ r . . ‘ , _...._:..." ‘ . .„::::.:... .. ..t_ i, , , , , , % % .. , . ,.., I _,. , ... .. gob 11 ,1 m :0 ,. •1. a [ 1,..-- .,, 11'..4"'' 11. • it PRELIMINARY PLAT - EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE: APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR 14-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBDIVISION AND EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, Files No. PP-132-78 and E-137-78; property located along the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 100 feet south of N.E. 24th Street, south of Glencoe Division No. 5 and west of Glencoe, Division No. 2. APPLICANT GEORGE OpERHOLIZER (W1NDSTAR) T0TAL AREA ±3.84 acres . . , PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Union Avenue N. E. „ G-7200 EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USE Undeveloped _ PROPOSED USE 1.4-lot single family residende subdiVtsion COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential t, COMMENTS . _ . _ .. I . i-'".- . , . , . . „ • I, „ . „ .p,, ,_.....„..jii.,.1• . . . B .‘.7---------1 61E144 llgirelit$ 111E 26771 7L. 1.141141WrA04 % &_, _ N.11 ,e 5ewO® 1.4= upp v ney rse, I /WO' • .vl p___________ .1c• Isitig. , .9 1 E2Nif tie tags I . I . -G• . * err/ o 10 20.7. . a £ . . /.//Airt. i m 1 I , g aril ' ' &Ira gm • I • I me 41iikriA6. $146te FAMILI ("firs I . • fittn), • - me 24 rd... 1sr . .. • : .• . .., . . . d 474 • 1.._•...i. . ... . . _ • , , .• . -. . . - • ii 1 1 . 1 . • i I • in. • . . kr. is * „ ..- '. . ti • 1,6Lg*cod .:Div: jos- fl 1,, . .---Abel', -5P cn 'r3 Cn lig)4911 eg)t lie- it.r.:: ., 1.14,;:,..,:,7h,17::,!i, • ' ' -- i • t i.ICV;g:Iiig.tti;!:'.:4. 4.-Cdiiat.K-gtf.A:c' • . . . -• • I 9,, 1{7.fit' 7.-...-::::ssm - 4 II , • • , . • J: o.ig ,,,r „,0,,,_H,,,•.i, ,,r.",,,„,:],•,::ii:,;,,,i.,101:5::, . .•- ,..,,,,• 1. ;,:lmcw1.4.1,:tolimig:rAi.i . .- irm tin•= •,..14114747474.viwii 304.14,4 • - I 04.1i;11411.,,i*I,41,0ilpul41.44%isil • : . , • .' . . . . ,. • ioiroi.t.:.s1;,,,404.4mtwomino.,.4.40 ,..p_ix • • . .t., , . 1 Mi•graidipitilitalla r . D . , to cpf;:i 01)11,4 i. 11111te !r*f .1711:'!'..: ' .. .. f: 50. 10; 'Mb or . . . ' e7.-i.il.T.I.7:17.•riAt.;?.. .4:::X::::artil,' i . f.' 0 0 , ..rt.. ri:-' gjni. _in.'. rt.'• . -en___- . I .:14:'::e5;':1:t,kitgitillitigt:O.:010,1... :iiii.44 it , . c., I L-1 u."), 1-,-, MU.IMa•/Mr a ,r,!,ika:1:110,;•;4•':iii.ellit,,:t014114,;•.ili:F.141 11*. . . •)% 1 I ;:::!.:•C':''k:iiP.i*:.•:]i$:'•,Vi!i ','';::: :g.i.•••;':IA:'.g!.!::k...;:'::4;:i:::.-*.:::c; : "ap- • • W q 113 Go EtOlEis. - 4 - I .• . . 1.1 )7- , ' .6* "5" 0 5 r L .' . ._. .' I . 112a . • . , lit .- . •' 4. - Ill 123 1:21 ci C3 rD ifli iefif 1 • . lie. It . : . . . • ,-I : ' . ' , ' . . . . ;3 ct3 c:;11:3 Go 17:3 lie 8 • 00 I • : ' I) I)g h4•i p in- . /04 -ra .- •b I • - . , : ..1•rirritiLdimar,i r a I ' . Ali 11.4 I I I ff MI 1 t . . . • . . • . . , . . , , . ,•• . . i• il ... _ .. .. . . .... .,. , . . „ • 04444 top° . ii i. e' , .., ! , ,. . , Zei.m4141.44Y 944e tic./10-192-e!lb' - • , Ael#104. No. : eq3118- N ,-• . .. • i.- . . . , . . . . . . , • . . . - •.: 7 - . _. . . • ,. . . - r.1 ..• . , . . . , . . . , . . . • _.., • . . -, 11:.:. . . . . , ‘ , , . , , • • �� o THE CITY OF RENTON tb tj MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 4 sir 'o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'O �Q L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 0• 4IED SE P- --�0 March 8, 1978 • TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney . FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Scope of Examiner's Authority per Section '4-3010. (B) . During the public hearing on the preliminary plat application, No. PP-132-78, the issue arose as to whether the Examiner possessed the authority under Section'4-3010. (B) .1 to deviate from the preliminary plat requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 11, without an application for and review of an exception per Section 9-1109. Section 4-3010. (B) ._1 clearly provides the Examiner the authority to impose conditions upon an application in response to the specific circumstances involved. The issue is the character of these . conditions. Does this section alone permit making less restrictive or deviating from the requirements of Chapter 11? Or does this section merely allow the Examiner to stipulate conditions in addition to the requirements of Chapter 11? My evaluation of the issue is that only through the exception process (Section 9-1109) can the requirements of Chapter 11 be deviated from or made less restrictive. An application must be filed and a public hearing ,held therein in order for the Examiner to so act. Section • 4-3010. (B) .1 does not replace or precede Section 9-1109. Furthermore, Section 4-3010. (B) .1 permits imposing only conditions which are.more restrictive than or in addition to the requirements of Chapter 11. Do you concur? Since the public hearing on the subject preliminary plat .was held on March 7, 1978, I will need your response by March 15 or sooner, if possible, to integrate it into my decision which is due March 21, 1978. THank ypu, • • L. Ric Beeler Hearing Examiner • cc: Michael Smith, Planning Department • Rai 0 CJ b OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY . RENTON,WASHINGTON ® mi. POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 0 4147' fo SEPtC"° March 21 , 1978 • TO: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner • FROM: Daniel Kellogg, Assistant City Attorney RE: Scope of Examiner' s Authority per Section 4-3010. (B) Dear Rick: • • I have your memo of March 8, 1978 re: Scope of Examiner' s Authority under Section 4-3010. (B) for reply. This will confirm our telephone conversation of March 16, . 1978 in which I advised you that we concur with your opinion that the Hearing Examiner does not have jurisdiction to impose conditions less restrictive then the requirements of Chapter 11 of the Subdivision Ordinance in the absence of a formal application for exception. • Section 4-3010 (B) states in part: "Conditions , modifications and restrictions which may be imposed are, but are not limited to additional set backs, screenings in the form of landscaping and fencing, covenants, easements and dedications or additional road rights of way (emphasis added) It ' is clear from the language of Section 9-1109 (2) that an. • exception may be considered by the Hearing Examiner only after formal application to the Planning Department. Therefore, in the absence of such application', the Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction only to impose conditions , modifications and restrictions which are mare restrictive than the requirements of Chapter 11. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. V our „ RECEIVED • CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Daniel Kellogg 41111 1�1AR211978 PM DK: b j m 7,WTI 819 Wahl&1.2r36415,6 RECEIVED cry OF RENTON liEAlifdMa EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR\ 7106 4111 MO � .' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 7 , 1978 7 IBIT NO. ' ' ' APPLICANT: GEORGE OBERHOLTZER - WINDSTAR r; 4-44 P,-(g02- 7f1,___ FILE NO. : PP- 132-78, PRELIMINARY PLAT F WT • E-137-78, EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE -/ 7— `7r A.,., SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval for a` proposed fourteen ( 14) lot single family residence subdivision and an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance limiting the length of cul -de-sacs to a maxi- mum of 500 feet in length . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record: GEORGE OBERHOLTZER 2 . Applicant: GEORGE OBERHOLTZER . 3. Location : Property located along the east side of Union Avenue N. E. approxima\tely 100 feet south of N. E. 24th Street , south of Glencoe Division No . 5 and • west of Glencoe Division No . 2 . 4.` Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . : Size of Property: Approximately 3. 84 acres . 6. Access : Via Union Avenue N . E. 7 . Existing Zoning : G-7200 , General Classification ,District, single family, minimum lot size 7.200 square feet. II 8. Existing Zoning G-7200; G, General Classification . in the Area : District; SR-1 , Suburban Residence District. 9 . Comprehensive Plan : Single Family Residential 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record • Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by 'City ordinance. C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow titre subdivision of the subject site into 14 single family residence lots for future development of single family residences . In order to allow such subdivision , the applicant is also requesting Iti an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City on March 28, 1969 , by Ordinance No. 2471 . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site is level . ' • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 7 , 1978 PAGE TWO RE : APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL AND EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - GEORGE OBERHOLTZER - WINDSTAR 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture , berries , row crops , and for urban development. 3. Vegetation : The majority of the site consists of sparse ground cover with small stands of Douglas fir trees scattered through- out the site. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation of the site provides a suit- able habitat for birds and small animals . 5. Water: There is no evidence of standing surface water on the site. 6. Land Use : The surrounding area is predominantly single family residential in nature, with scatterings of undeveloped parcels . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area is primarily a mixture of single family residential with numerous undeveloped parcels scattered throughout the site . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1. Water and Sewer: An existing 6 inch water main runs along N. E. 24th Street, while the Mercer Island Pipeline operates along Union Avenue N. E. Eight (8) inch sanitary sewers are located along N. E. 24th Street and Union Avenue N. E . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Routes 42 and 242 operate along Edmonds Avenue N. E. and Union Avenue N. E. approximately one and one- fourth ( 14) miles to the southeast of the site. 4. Schools : Sierra Elementary School is located approximately one-eighth ( 1/8) of a' mile to the northwest, McKnight Middle School one mile to the southwest , and Hazen Senior High School approximately two-thirds (2/3 ) of a mile to the northwest of the subject site. 5. Parks : Kiwanis Park is situated approximately one mile to the south while the proposed neighborhood is to be located one- fourth (4) of a mile to the northwest. In addition , the recre- ational playfields of McKnight Middle School and Hazen Senior High School are available for organized recreational activity. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-729 , G, General Classification District 2. Section 4-706 , R- 1 , REsidential Single Family I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN j: OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Subdivision Regulations , Section 9- 1106, Preliminary Plat Requirements 2 . Land Use Report , 1965, pages 17 and 18, objectives , and page 11 , residential . 3 . Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 5 , D, Subdivision of Land, and page 6 , E, Trafficways . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 7 , 1978 PAGE THREE RE : APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL AND EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - GEORGE OBERHOLTZER - WINDSTAR J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS: Transition of the subject site from its current state to 14 single family residential units will disturb soil and vegetation and increase storm water runoff. These impacts will be minor in nature and can be alleviated through proper development controls . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : Additional social interactions within the neighborhood will result from the development of the subject site to single family residential . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43. 21C, a Declaration of Non-significance has been used for the subject proposal . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map arel; attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Utilities Division 4 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department 111 0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, which designates the site and area for single family residential land use. 2 . The proposed plat is consistent with objectives number 4 and number 6 of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, 1965 , pages 17 and 18, and the existing single family residential uses in the general vicinity. 3. The proposed plat meets or exceeds all zoning and subdivision ordinances ' requirements relating to minimum lot size ( 7200 square feet ) and dimensions . Corner lots have been platted larger than interior lots per Section 9- 1108F(4) . , 4 . Proposed street widths and improvements meet ordinance require- ments . However., improvements should be installed as part of this plat along Union Avenue N. E. so that there are continuous improvements from N. E. 24th Street and Glencoe No. 5 south to southerly boundary of the subject plat. 5 . Complete engineering design drawings for utilities and storm drainage will be required before commencement of any construc- tion and prior to final plat approval . 6. Storm drainage and retention calculations will be required as part of design approval by the Public Works Department. Oil / water separators are also required by ordinance. 7. The Building Division has street name corrections to be made on the plat. N. E . 22nd Street shall be N. E. 22nd Place , and Union Court shall be Vashon Court N. E. I I ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER • PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 7 , 1978 PAGE FOUR RE : APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL AND EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - GEORGE OBERHOLTZER - WINDSTAR 6k/ -65-o 8. Theroposed cul -de-sac is approximately 660 feet longer than the 500 feet maximum allowable length established in the ordi - nance . The applicant has applied for an exception to the ordi - nance for the proposed cul -de-sac . 9. The subject site abuts Glencoe Division No. 2 on the east and Glencoe Division No . 5 on the north , neither of which provides any street access to the subject site. The property to the south is not of sufficient size or shape to provide a reason- able continuation of a street, if one were stub-ended at the south property line of the subject site. 10. If the proposed cul -de-sac were shortened to meet the 500 foot maximum length , pipestem lots would be necessary to develop the property between the end of such a cul -de-sac and the , northerly property. This situation would also create an unusual configuration for Lot No. 11 . 11 . The actual number of lots served by the additional 160 feet of cul -de-sac length is less than what would normally be the case because the cul -de-sac abuts adjacent property and Tract "A" instead of lots being locatedi entirely around the cul -de-sac . Only two additional lots are served along the 160 extra feet ( lots 9 and 10) . It can be reasonably assumed that even if the cul -de-sac were 500 feet in length , at least two pipestem lots could be created at the end of the cul -de-sac . The pro- posed cul -de-sac provides better access to these lots . 12. The sidewalk at the end of the proposed cul-de-sac should be placed adjacent to the curb and evergreen trees planted n the planter area to provide a buffer between the proposed street and adjacent single family residential lots . 13. An additional partial cul -de-sac has also been provided at the corner of N. E. 22nd Place and Vashon Court N. E. This provides additional access and emergency circulation within the subject plat. 14. Suitable utilities are available to the subject site. 15. A number of significant evergreen trees exist on the subject site. These should be preserved and incorporated into plat design development (Section 9- 1108. 19. B) . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the proposed preliminary plat based on the above analysis and the exception for the cul -de-sac length as proposed subject to the following conditions : 1 . Provision of improvements along Union :Avenue N. E. for the entire length between Glencoe Division No. 5 and the southerly boundary of the subject site. 2 . Final approval by the Public Works Department of the detailed plans for utilities and storm drainage as per ordinance require- ments . 3. Preservation of as many significant trees as possible. Only those trees directlywithin the proposed street right-of-way or utility easements shall be removed as part of the plat construction . No trees shall be removed without approval of the Planning Department. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 7 , 1978 PAGE FIVE ' RE : APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL AND EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE - GEORGE OBERHOLTZER - WINDSTAR 4 . Street names shall be revised per Building Division recommen- dations . 5 . Provision of a sidewalk adjacent to the curb at the end of the cul -de-sac to provide a buffer area between the proposed street and adjacent single family residence lots . Said planter shall be landscaped with native evergreen trees and shrubs per Plan- ning Department approval as part of the plat improvements . • • • j t 1 j ' , I 1 -- ��Y� ll _ W , 1 a - 1 ,!w 1 , I 1 , f Yl7 140� I_ 404 •fir, .., .` • to • tiT 1.,,I_IAA. I, . I ' • • , . ' h:''' ' • =.DPI _ 5�� sy, I ,i,,,,,...51 1 111 iliVIORt • ' ' . • 4.1., - e l _ • : I ( 1 GU`a T WU-1 4la till 5E loin+ ST t i T-' 1 -•r• 1 is I ; yitk.-' I 1 Pw 7. rameri&ountiA CI) , i-')•4 •i —4' .i.yq.-7-7 f, f-A i 1 1 -.' { .� ,2_.,• ‘`•,, ' lJ•N a57•• .. ar,•w .__. . .. . _ ... • `,7. S -I. r u 11 • 2.-- Lige . ' . , r 1I YY f •r ‘IL1 is=.. 1 W • , 1 Rom••a 7 . :.m ••©Ir ma T,,ZP,;:.'..,, 1 ;s T - M l IT.„ •T. .,T �T ,v P it 1 ta_ •. 1-� I 1 it_ 234sGlevlo,,rt •IIcclI 1 ra , ; I 7 ::::: R3 _ s . N J y 1 • 41;.: , IF ••„, • Y _ ,, LI i 1 ---. . . ?in, _IL____ ___j; - IfIll.) .-.. Elti ' . . -mesio4m. H^.""— J- • v 12 PRELIMINARY PLAT - EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE: APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR 14-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBDIVISION AND EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, Files No. PP-132-78 and E-137-78; property located along the east side of Union Avenue N.E. approximately 100 feet south of N.E. - . 24th Street, south of. Glencoe Division No. 5 and west of Glencoe Division No. 2. APPLICANT GEORGE OBERHOLTZER (WINDSTAR) TOTAL AREA ±3 .84 acres . i PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Union Avenue N. E. I • . l EXISTING ZONING G-7200 i EXISTING USE Undeveloped 1; . 14-lot single family residence subdivision ;I PROPOSED USE ; • Jil COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential rli1 COMMENTS � ' 1 i j'' • C ... M... .. •.-,,, .. -T^•r .1^-t lx„•.Rn .�, -., .,. , • _. . I .t ._� , u• - ,1, ,1 i l 1 V.6..oco: i I, . 1 ., MO e e , 1 !Ngitgo4 ineieffir$ .e. • •.,; ifs.4/41e4rAgl ' NE 4577# 7i.. .- Ai : N V %Au • , , • IC/#001,.. Z • 4•..0 2. R:1 . _lit 'k role : l gat. It s). , _._. Il /MET] .01E1 a8 .. axis ,vgi 1 LIB z . > • ..,, ,- i-,.. ' - cif./ I:2 . Gip col. alr,v x Ifr . gig seCia 1V01 wad "PP lip Ow ppm up 2443 A PAIIA er $bs/CrLe fAisigl4 (IN ir5 I 962-1=7:161 ..„ Al I 47 4 Ale 1-4 171. 5r. 1 I P"--1" i I I i - ---- NS 20 rat.r • I • A • g I In 1 a 1314 1014, 17 4 I 1 E is Ai& 5I .2 1 ii .12 161-E iVe04 . :Div. Ists• si , CO irif3/sal i MU.. i, " - ,- 'boo', - I:1 4 . i igingintiiii; gigan::'::Rtiati;i::i:i .1 I ..9,.,........jittn : il.RIPP.;J.Millliillldr...:qiZIE . - 0 1 0 i sr .sr i atozoi,,14141),!1,10;§,,i,,:,111r,:llait viiiiii 1' , - • • 0 0 l• 04 4Csitl'iN:Ii;;:!i::*<: :::10A:M45:'.'1141:94:'°::M*Kii a I:3 r=3 )[:ffirfinisoi . 4;: •',", ' s,.., M171:::;.; q . .4:1.;;i:,i!,;i,i::,R:;:,,,,,,,::,., I 11,101111taltiiiiilligetein.0.6 tY1511 - LI . iiiveol:iiiiiffitli:$i,liii : M: initiastigniigia! 6-p-g • * 7. 0 1:0 rz;311;3 IP iFIt I illizilitailuttnitinsome _ , 0. lipiv,z4 .........................................................................,...............,....................,......... .„.,„......,....„ _ 50. 102 Alb sr ......„......................... ..................................,....,.„....,..... ......,..„............. „.........„...„. ..............,,...........„................„...................,..,..................„..„ .....„,......„ ...........................................................w..................................„:_,..._..,.......„..,..._„:„ f -6--::.%.:r:::-:::':•ri!!,: irrEmt'".,.,-.,,'"'":•,""'""":",!:!::',5,:':',..'i:•:,?::.:•••T. 1 1.1,illifilleisigkeimeilig, ,yo,ki,,;-:,..,,i, ., - • 7 ( ill" 1 0 1ZI • ---Ii!:t!'!!!!:4:1::f'!:':I::illig;:•ii::t 47.:;;!:'!;!!i:"!:R'!!!!!::::•.i;:i!!:::"!!!!1:.!!.;'::,, i:::, "' 1..._.) --- ir......•ir,,za, i&ig . :;,i,iiiiiiiimii::.qp•!,::!iiig,!,,ii::i.,,;,;•::ii,,,,:„:!!.n:ia;,.1/2„:,:::.., t;,,:,;,.:...*,,,:4,:,: ,,,•:,,,,i,:.:,:.,,,:,;:4v 1 12, r-LI rim oral 02-4 i ' 1 inVi.:i.11111111.111111BIN:01.111:411111411.101 , # , pi . 1 zisiib I illr itte # zicv. 0af/ -1- • 611*, i, I zszt] 4. ' gtb ED In cp C:3 0*A i 1 r gjj • 4/ 51., kiit I . .441p--w-h .-1Tiimm , cib ' • „ 0 CM CZ C:3 Ei=1 o lee 11 0 I og • Vi ivil Zorg .111/ ., ,_L.- ' 104 174 b I Z IIIII Mie lair 1 I i I I I • ge5 I 4°9 • illirMaN IISI• . , . : . . .. , .i. . . OCALg Illogoos • . ()I../get iirte. . : • I: , - i• Crilogeef.. 0016$,Alei,4%0A, rtieoAliA144Y fhkr 1.:40, „•• ,t•,, • f, , . ?P-134-16 efliaC)A4 fr•J°' 1 0-131-18.', .. , . , •, ,, • 1 . '?!..i. •- ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. DATE ROUTED PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE Pc,,,L- , n..7? SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT • , • ., SPECIAL PERMIT • WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT .. PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 7,114/76 • SIGNATURE OR INITA DEPARTMENT APPROVAL QENI AL DATE 10,, TRAFFIC EN . ••••••••••••••••••••,14..• NGINEERING >< .„.. HEALTH REVIEWER ' S COMME S OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : Dry or; • , UTkuct1.1 `,,, - A.T":1•••. • • . N it y e • , . Arre -57401. 41446r c-A44 4° 0 S . o PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . : „ • • •.,• • .• „ • • i • . . . . • 1 . , . .. . • r /r i PROPOSEL!FINAL pW-ARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NUN-SIGNIFICANCE Tentative Plat Application No . No. 093-77 C3 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-287-77 ° FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Application for tentative plat approval for 14 lot subdivision. Proponent GEORGE OBERHOLTZER Location of Proposal N. E. 24th Street and Union Avenue N. E. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have ( not have a • significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ; x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030(2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma e_ after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental significance..: , The delcaration is based upon the retention of as many signi- ' ficant trees on the site as posslible and incorporating them i. ' into plat design and development. Measures . if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate th'fi environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would , . withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • Responsible Official i Michael L . Smith i Title Associate P1 nner • Date December 23 , 1977 , Signature f• � - 1 City of Renton i. i' „ j r I:. 1 ,i ; 1)fo."- .,.. i ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department • Fire Department . Library Department . Park Department • Police Department Public Works Department . 8 Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) t"-lam L4 R►a��_%I FJ{ ., ,.,.„ , .. ,. SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 24/ - 7 ? ; Application No . : Q -77 Action Name - - 2 : , • s ' Please review the attached . '; Review requested by ( date) : , , REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • • Department: % , Comments : � o bJ' Zc. irr�._S S.�- �o� eC. r . r-e 0 ; ei,i ,,a.- Si a.e. r.4-a v do. / r+ 6,... 1...... / ; taA 1.4•0-. . 1.., . . ,,,! ,i ! . , . - ' . , . 11//4 17,7 . ' • S'igriature of Director on Authori ed R entatve epresi Date i i ! REVIEW BY OTHER CIT DEP'ARI'MENTS : • II H ' Depa'rtmen : _ • uj^it_,r/,.� j r • Comments : SAe`+r! HJ fl/vG..L. — bT-i.) ots`. 'p.-5 genii '. f ., • '" � �! �r` A�uthori c�ed Re `r�esentati��"�� Datr� !` Signature °Qf Di-rsecto1., v p • ;i:: !)! p. " i FI j :(OVER) •6-76 ! i I:.X' :,-ron , -r: )"---------- -------- , ,.. • • . . , REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . • . . , Department : • Comments : Vo!!'a (It5r_i*:.IN;11%, - SoNLeIN. "Cc=0 4Z‘c04,3 06TO%E....%) 91X?D. •, . • •• . , . . .‘ \4!;:e.V\W4S).04,A-e-4:L).......,..... ' • \XI7L-5/r11 Signature of Dire t r .or !t1It 'Representative -", - --Tate REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . . • Department : • , I. Comments : ., „ , . , ...... ...___ __. „... ..,. ! , 1.• ! , ! . . . • ', . . . . . _ , . • . ik i . •i . . :. • • • -• ; 1 . . .. . . , '. • . . •• • ,.. , . Signature of Di 'rector or. AUthorized ReOreSentatiVe - '- ' ' ' Date . .. . • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • . , Department : . • , . ; • , , . , . Comments : . ' . , . . . . ' • • , i . . . . . . . : . I . ; • 1 , „ . • ; I , . . . . ! i • , 1 • f •--'tighature of, Diretb-r-;67TAUthore -ReWbSiiil'itive' - 7 : Date . . tid ! ,Il 1 .. ,, . . . , . , 1 . •„ • • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : , . ; • H i ...., • I! . — '• •:,: ;•1 , 1 Department • I ,, •!, , ,_ , _ , . , . — .., . . . , :I • .•,11 ' $. •II,L1 1 • Commeiptpi. : . .,1p : . , • .. , H , :1 • 1 • i.• „ -• ••• • i i . 1 • ,.'.11 II: , 1 • ::: 11 . . . ., 1 . • 1 ,w1 ,,,, ; .. •,, f. •••. 11 . , • ! !•1 ,!,I, ,.'! , ,; ' i 11 1 ;,1; • • 'H' ; ,.: . !! ! . •,,..4 i;!, fl'i . , ,. 1 ., . . ....„ • ; : • l• 14; . i. .. • ., .; tP , •,i . . . . ' • . . , • i; . . • ' , ..: , ' . . . • ,:.• , . • ,, • • .• . , • , , Signature of Diretter.:on. ut Ot' ze Opresentat Ve- - - • —trite •1 • ., . . 1 • :..', i !i . . 11 , .• • .;,,, , 1,i -i.p,iiii,, '�'l�, titbit, (I;) Covenants, Restrictions and Reservz.„ions ` �( ®�" ,) . The premises shall be subject to the easements, stric'g ^ rid D C)', r reservations of record, and •further . shall be subject re ripctions-po. y, and reservations which are to be included in the deed`� coiivw. ance '' herein as follows ; • G •NPA� f�� t (1 ) There is to be a ten (10' ) foot. screening easement a the 4 rear- of all lots, no structure is to be built, or placed in the ten (10' ) foot easement area. (2) The property is to be used exclusively for residential purposes, A ' single family homes, having a minimum of three bedrooms, with attached ;;: two car garage, a minimum of FOURTEEN HUNDRED square foot of living area, ' exclusive of the garage area, and having a minimum of one full bathroom, i. ' end one half bath. No mobile homes will be permitted . .i,; (3) No accumulation of inoperative automobiles, recreation vehicles, or trucks, or the components thereof, or other junk will be permitted. : '.:: (4) Any dwelling or structure erci c ted or placed on any lot shall 'be i `R` ; completed as to external apperance, including the ,finished painting, withind;;. nine months from date of commencement of construction and shall he;- i connected to public sewer. ' °,' '•;"• mis • (5) No animals, livestock, or poultry or any kind:shall be A.aiscdp :•';yi' ' is .:k.(. bred, or kept on :any lot, : exc.ept that dogs, cats, or other household pets ?a'. • may be kept in comnliance with existing laws and regulations an:4 pr�ovidc:�i ;'. that 'they are not kept, bred,: or maintained for commercial purposes . The . .i'! foregoing is intended to exclude the keeping of any pets, such as dogs, . v or cats, or '.birds, in numbersjunder conditions reasonably objectionable , : ' In the closely-built-up residential community. . ;' . f I T •r Y, ,I • ^ 0. �I� . >a j •II I . � , . `)--4 •;; I :I•I 1. 1 ! i 4 F!I", ' j ! it ,1,, !l l'' ' II li _ f: s! 1� 4 . G • 1 ': f , - ,i;` EXIHIBIT D s:RVICL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this day of , 197 , in King County, Washington. 1 . Parties : Water District ; 107 , a Municipal Corporation in King County, Washington, and • , owners of real property hereinbelow- described. • . • 2 . Real Property: RECEIVED CITY OF RENTQN EXHIBIT NO. • HEARING EXAMINER • MAR 71978 ITEM NO. P/ /.5-7- 77 AM 748q9oliMio2111112034#506 3. Availability of Service: Upon payment of all . necessary dharges to the District, and complying with all requirements of King County, the District shall provide servic. to the real property above described. • 4 . Monthly Charges : • During the period the property is being served by the connection hereinabove referred to, the owner shall pay to the District its regular monthly service charges in accordance with its published schedules including all future amendments, and-such- charges- shall be a lien against the above described property to the extent that same are due and unpaid, subject only to the lien for general taxes , for all such sums, including penalties and interest as provided for in the District' s resolutions as amended from • time to time. 5. Any connection to the District ' s lines shall meet • the approval of the District' s engineers . 6 . As additional consideration, the owner agrees to join in the execution of a petition for the formation of a storm drainage ULID, at such time as same is deemed necessary by the appropriate authorities in King County and the District , • -1- and not to protest in the formation of same. 7. This -Agreement is a covenant running with the land • and is binding upon the successors , heirs and assigns of the parties hereto, and may be recorded in the sole option of the District. OWNERS : • KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT P107 BY: • STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss . - . COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me • , to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed thc .within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free , and voluntary act and deed, for the uses . and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of , 1.97 . • NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State • of t•dashington , residing at • -2- e. , arc , 197P, Memorandum: ' Mr . Michael L. Smith, Associate Planner, Planning Department Department, City of Renton Washington. Dear Mr. Smith; Ref: 1::indstar Preliminary Plat There is furnished to you 2 copies of the Recorded Exhibit (i) Covenants, Restriction and Reservations, pertaing to the referenced Preliminary Plat, for your information and file . I have mailed copies of the Recorded Exhibit (E) , to Mr. George Obeerholtzer for his information and to give to Mr. Wayne E. Chastain, prepared the Preliminary Plat . Very Truly Yours ) a)-i2---c2-1-/--6-Ev-jee.f.. A.. ' +e t �� d, \ .s of Recorded Exhibit (E ) �� I,� ,; Lowell C. "`,einberg. MAP 107,1 ',e,- , . ri 6, - • a • . I RECEIVED HEARING EXAMINER • MAR 71979 AM PM 71819110,]fia32a i a2ae3m4a5t,6 • • • EXHIBIT BOO N. • ITEM NO. Fi 4-6-7- 7( .' , • �,, '-23-O ing County, Union ��,-- nue il -y- -% r " exhibit (E) Rcntan, "shin_7ton. Covenant.s, Restrictions end Reservations. The premises. shall be subject to the easements, restrictions and reservations of record, and :further shall be subject to restrictions LO if) and reservations which are to be included in the deed of conveyance CD herein as follows ; CD _- (1) There is to be a ten (10' ) foot screening easement at the CV CD rear of all lots, no structure is to be built, or placed in the ten (101 ) ®D: r' foot easement area. (2) The property is to be used exclusively for residential purposes, single family homes, having a minimum of three bedrooms, with attached two car garage, a minimum of FOURTEEN HUNDRED square foot of living area, exclusive of the garage area, and having a minimum of one full bathroom, and one half bath. No mobile homes will be permitted. (3) No accumulation of inoperative automobiles, recreation vehicles, or trucks, or the components thereof, or other junk will be permitted. (4) Any dwelling or structure erected or placed on any lot shall be comoleted as to external apperance , including the finished painting, within nine months from date of commencement of construction and shall be connected to public sewer. (5) No animals, livestock, or poultry or any kind shall be raised, bred, or kept on any lot, except that dogs, cats, or other household pets _g < <] On.a Provided way 1'e Dart in 2Cmtn]_ anCe r;i th Bxi St].na' laws and regulations l�.tioris �.� .� _.. that they are not kept, bred, or maintained for commercial purposes . The foregoing is intended to exclude the keeping of any pets, such as dogs, or cats, or birds, in numbers under conditions reasonably objectionable, in the closely-b4� •. sidential community. 'I 1� r RECEIVED 'o �� _�_�_ ; ;, t. , , MAR 01978a 1..t, ...... 4 . •Alegria . . .;gin}.)f-err i /VG DEPP� �P o, TOWNb ND & ASSOCIATES, INC. v �a,r I. DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS & LAND SURVEYORS 409 SOUTH 3rd AVENUE, ir,, rw"' KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 (2061 854-2043 February 1078 o, ), %`' Subdivision Hearing ExaminerIA •-•�• ' Ig Zi City of Renton 2 T 8 Renton, Wn. 98055 '',,2i �` Subject : Preliminary Plat of Windstar `�'ART@I1E Our Project No. 77095 ---- Dear Sir : _.. We respectfully request ,.an exception to the ordinance limiting the length of a cul-de-sac to a maximun of 500 feet in length for the following reasons. The Plat of Glencoe Div. No. 5 abuts us on the North and the Plat of Glencoe Div. No. 2 abuts us on the East. Neither of these two plats provide any street access -pôint5that we could connect to. The property to the South is presently divided into three separate tax lots thereby making it unfeasible or necessary to provide any direct street access to the South as any through, street into these properties would be a detriment to any future subdividing they may propose. ' In view of the above access limitations, imposed on this tract of . land by adjacent developments, it would appear the only reasonalble way to provide access to our subject plat and---allow reasonable development is by means of a cul-de-sac which is approximately 600 feet in length. I trust the foregoing is an adequate 'explanation of our request for an exception to your ordinance. If you have any questions on this, matter, please do not hesitate to contact the under- signed. RECEIVED Very truly yours , Townsend-Chastain & Assoc. , Inc. CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER; _ NEAR 71978 f z ti AM PM Way E. Chastain 71819110,11)12,'1..20:1I4,5,6 c.c. George Oberholtzer . 7 EXHIBIT NO ITEM NO. /f /47- 7 . -- / 7 7/ Op CITY OF RENTON /CI • PLAT APPLICATION r ko d o ,, 19?,v44 ,SHORT PLAT FILE NO. -2T , MAJOR PLAT DATE REC'D 00 . TENTATIVE FEE $4/,7. e-o X PRELIMINARY RECEIPT NO. .31.56- FINAL SM NO. PUD NO. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : 1. Plat Name & Location Windstar-NE 24th St, & Union Ave. City if Renton 2. No. Lots 14 Total Acreage 3.84 Zoning G-7200 3. OwnerGeorge Oberholter Phone 255-6517 Address 14439-143rd P1. S.E. Renton, Wn, 98055 4 . Engineer Townsend-Ceastain & Assoc. , Inc. Phone 854-Z043 Address 409 So. 3rd Ave. Kent, Wn. 98031 5 . Underground Utilities: Yes No Not Installed Telephone X X Electric eve Street Lights Natural Gas X TV Cable X X 6 . Sanitation & Water: X-7 City Water X l Sanitary Sewers L7 Water District No. L7 Dry Sewers /7 Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING • BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER • 9. STAFF ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 10. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 .. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE DATE BOND NO. & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . ek&i,6if (43) . _4', . , vo TOWNS' 3 & ASSOCIATES, INC. s DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS & LAND SURVEYORS 409 SOUTH 3rd AVENUE, 49 :aa1t9 KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 (206) 854-2043 2i Sept . 26 , 1977 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR GEORGE OR1 RHOLT71.R Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Northwest ' of Sec- tion 3, Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W.M. ; thence Nnl °55 ' 5n"l, along the West line of said Northwest , a distance of 741 . 62 feet; thence S87°53926"E, a distance of 3non0 fret to the East margin of Uniori Ave, N. E. and the TRUE PC)INT OF I? U;INNING; thence continuing S87O53 '26"E, a distance of 316 . 53 fret ; thence NC11°40' 08"E, a distance of 72. 00 feet ; thence N12°';1 ' 42"W, a dis- tance of 64 . 17 feet; thence NOl040 ' O8"f, a distance of 52 . 00 feet to the North line of the South ,- of the North ', of tht' Southwest :II of the Northwest * of said Section 3 ; thence 0'7°'1 ° ' 32"E, along said North line, a distance of 205. 01 feet to tie West boundary . line of the Plat of Glencoe Division 2 , as recorded in Volume on of plats , pages 50 and 51, King records of Coun tv Washington; thence SO1°40 ' n8"W9 along said West boundary 1 i n , distance:acF of ` 457.42 feet to the South line of the North 1 of the North 1 • of the South of the Southwest 1- of the Northwest ', of said Section 3; ' thence N87°37'49"W9 along said South line , a distance of 477, 88 feet ' :,; to the East margin of union Ave, N. E. ; thence Nf i °5`i ' 5n"E, along said past margit 9 a distance of 286 . n8 Feet to the 'IFt!E POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 3 . 84 Acres ' Project No. 77nq; rw,r �� 4- 0 WAS !° , _ ft ,o, . ' I ,,, ? Qf+�O AFC/STEfk 5�� . , EX/4 077 (o �,4v '�� _ L'i, 94/../) L ;! AFFIDAVIT, , ( ,, ._ ., . . A� D ,`/1.( i„,,. _sok,?,, , ., .8 O . , '%.‘*.t‘k____: ART I , George Oberholtzer - , being duly sworn, dec dam" that I am the owner*of. the property involved in this application and, that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all' respects true. an& correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. * Contract Purchaser Subscribed and sworn before me this 3/4 ' day of (a0,___74- , 19 V , Notary. Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Kent • • (Name. o t y. 4 Public) (Signatur. of Owner) • 409 S . 3rd Ave. Kent, Wash. - 98031 - 14439-143rd P1. S .E. (Address), (Address) '; '.';'k ` Renton Wash. (City) (State). .4 255-6547 ' (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION . This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and 'has been found toough and complete in every particular and to , conform to the rule ,....4.ndRaill tions of the Renton Planning Department r. governing the fit ' gLBKIlyil El ication. As n \ xlm Date Received U 19ll 1 .� By: 10 9NNG 1/ Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 �P A"" ^ TOWN .>C;ND & ASSOCIATE;S, INC. fr,;ipe. DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS & LAND SURVEYORS Iii • � !4! 409 SOUTH 3rd AVENUE, `n,�_� KENT, WASHINGTON 98031 (206) 854-2043 February 1 &978. . A. ( T I 'c � . o �' Q .Subdivision Hearing Examiner •••.,,�• d Z� City of Renton •.'2 9,a i Renton, Wn. 98055 `\\ 4''+.,• 2c ,c Subject : Preliminary Plat of Windstar N-P, 1,10 ART Our Project No. 77095 Dear Sir : - We respectfully request ..an exception to the ordinance limiting the length of a cul-de-sac to a maximun of 500 feet in length for the following reasons . The Plat of Glencoe Div. No. 5 abuts us on the North and the Plat of Glencoe Div. No. 2 abuts us on the East. Neither of. these two plats provide any street access- points : that :we_ could connect to. The property to the South is presently -divided into three separate tax lots thereby making it unfeasible or necessary to provide any direct street access to the South as any through - street into these properties would be a detriment to any future subdividing they may propose. . In view of the above access limitations, imposed on this tract of land by adjacent developments, it would appear the only reasonalble way to provide access to our subject plat and—allow reasonable development is by means of a cul-de-sac which is approximately 600 feet ,_in length. , - ? ,I trust the foregoing is an adequate explanation of our request for an exception to your ordinance. If you have any questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the under- signed. . Very truly yours, Townsend-Chastain & Assoc. , Inc. .r ild--- ') ,... c_{ i 4......:,,,.. Way E. Chastain. c.c. George Oberholtzer - r • H PROPOSED/FINAL DG%.LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NuN-SIGNIFICANCE Tentative Plat Application No . No. 093-77 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-287-77 El FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Application for tentative plat approval for 14 lot subdivision. Proponent GEORGE OBERHOLTZER ; Location of Proposal N. E. 24th Street and Union Avenue N. E. • • Lead Agency Renton Planning Department_ . This proposal has been determined to ❑ have ® not have a ' significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is [pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was 'ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental ' checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . ;Reasons for declaration of environmental significance:. The delcaration is based upon the retention of as many signi - , ficant trees on the site as possible and incorporating them ' into plat design and development. _ a • • Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the. environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would ;withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • • • • • • Responsible Official Michael L . Smith • Title Associate Planner Date December 23 , 1977 Signature City of Renton Pl a.,., ; .,n • I • • • • • • • II i'.f+ '•!, ‘ CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON - ' OF R E/�T ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1\I ) 0'�, U 1 1911 r w ; ••; FOR OFFICE USE ONLY "``� 27 t, ,.. • Application tl o. I=cJ�St f��.�'..:._....__._L 1�t— �3~ 9� �'g.; ,p LNG 'p.;F . .;'Environmental Checklist No._ Lek- - _ {.� '_17 • ': PROPOSED, date: _i1 / /7 FINAL , date : ® Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance ;,,,, 0 Declaration of Non-Significance. a Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be '''.t'•' prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a . proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where ,' you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided , or use additional pages if necessary. You should . include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- ; .•.. vant to the answers you provide. Lomplete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- ';'. out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , nut just to the license for which • r+,, you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers ..;;,; ' should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed , •(;;'' even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future . This will allow all ,;r; of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future . NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local. agencies in the State ;,' of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to • your proposal . If a question doe,: hot apply , just answer it "no" and continue on to the ,. next question. • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM xi : . U4CKGROUNU 1 . Name of Proponent George Oberholtzer :1- 2. Address and phone number of Proponent : 14439- 143rd Pl . S .E. Renton,- W a . 98065 -- ------'--- -- - ---— r ��1; •-�kf©'ICE': 2 Jr�--6- 47----••--- -------------------------...—.---- , ' 3. Date Checklist submitted NOV. /�/g77 4. Agency requiring Checklist _,-.c,i.ty.•_of_-_.IZt'nton------------ i`;; 5. Name of proposal , if applicable : ; r, Winddstar -------.. ..— — --- -- -- ;;? 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its '.,, size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate ;.{1;' , understanding of its scope and nature) : Proposed development encompassed 3 . 84 Acres , consisting J.": of 14 single family residential lots with an average of ) 9000 SF. Ft. of 1-et area. Acvel--egme-n t c onsa -t—-o a sin-1 e Cul-de-sac connecting to Union Ave . N. H. C Will have all ` ' underground utilities and lies West of and adjacent to t`'', the plat of Glencoe Div_ No. 2 & south of Glencoe Div. NO. 5 fYJ . — L. • 1, • -2- ti • •• 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Development slopes pentl.v to the east . There are existinc sinpl.e family residences to the east , in Glencoe Subdivision, also to the west across Union Ave. Property to the North is heinp rievelopm( by Mc Grath Homes & Property t-e South contains single family resi -lf 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : • • jUIle- 107R 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Approval of all utilities by City of Renton, D.O. E. & Metro with Regard to Sanitary Sewers 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: I,•;,; No • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Will submit fir prepliminary plat & final. plat following approval• - - of Tentative pta-t--- • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : y. • (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic > +, • substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction- or over- covering of the soil? �C YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief • features? • YES MAYBE N0 • ' (d) The destruction , covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? TES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YET- M YBE NO Explanation: • - • • • Is:, ,•'. (2) Air. Will the proposal result in:? (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air L, quality? Y S- MAYBE NO ,,,;;9,:' • (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NU- 'i' (c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature , ,{ or any change in climate , either locally or `;i.' regionally? R YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 2(a) Additional carbon monoxide result from , • the vehicles used by home owncrs in a very negiliable amount (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: - (a). Changes in currents , or the course of direction of )- water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO j (b) Changes in absorption rates ,, drainage patterns , or � Li\ the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO:.- - J— ? Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X_ f (c) •YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE Nb-_ (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ;`.•t. ground waters? YES MAYBE NO ,¢ . . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , o.r through `. '; interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _YES MAYBE NO i':'., (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate , (:,:, • phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , . ' or other substances into the ground waters? v YES MAYBE NO :•�,• 'it. (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available ' for public water supplies? I- ,,• , YES ' MAYBE NO I Explanation: 3 (h) Lawn fertilizer ' s would soak into lawn areas . ;Y• 1. I''V„ (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: ':?•' ,;:, (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any ti; t species of flora ( including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , '';1:,.': microflora and aquatic plants)? tr'. YES MAYBE NO �s ,I, r,,, ,,' (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or Y si'„ endangered species of flora? t.'..v. YES MAYBE NO Wk•• (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or ;<.'1', .. in a barrier to the normal replenishment o-f existing rs' ` species? YES MAYBE N� 4�.' k (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ;,t.s',',, YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1. ry, r� • ii i'; ' ' • ' %fe.i•N. , R ' f'h -4- ;;ri q . (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: 0%'.'I (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of 0..i any species of fauna (birds , land animals including :r,;',, reptiles , fish and shellfish , benthic organisms , • :;';,' insects or microfauna)? YES M NX O i;: •`; (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or '' `.,, endangered species of fauna? _ X ", YES MAYBE NO fi (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , :�•.;.;, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NiV. ;''•.. Explanation: 5-r-*i-1 —ma-y t-e-rupe r a i.l-y_r r u-c—-- h --ex-i -i nt h a_b; t a t •'', ,. for birds until such time as people put in new planti.nf s , etc . `"'' at which time the- --hah-i_tat--w.ou1-d___h __im rnve'l nr i nrreasprl since most birds readily adapt to human encroachment. • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X •/ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Only the introduction of a few more vehicles . ;'' (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or �:s,'' glare? _ Y u.'' ES Y MAYBE '.'1 r.. Ex anation: 1 , l • 1::,: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the !` '' present or planned land use of an area? 'f' ' YES - MAYBE !iff.. • :,� • Explanation: 1. ' ,1.. (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : !j'• . (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ ` ;,• • YES MAYBE N0- ,;;; .; (b) Depletion of any nonrenewahle• natural resource? . - ' '• YES MAYBE NO Explanation: fr' P$%•• ( 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an ,i;.;:.' explosion or the release of hazardous substances. (including , '.q., . but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) f , '., in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE N k°,, Explanation: . � ''':t. , j.`f J -- .. -'------ --------- '' rr, — - --—-- -- W,. pr."• .. ;•., , ( 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- rt: '• bution, density, or growth rate of the human population .' of an area? _ r,i. YES f. YBE NO- PExplanation: Increase in population of the ime'!iate area 1w11 a ; ;,, -5- ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: ( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO (b) • Effects on .existing parking facilities , or demand , for new parking? YES MAYBE NO `C (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE WO-- (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO • (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO 13a- Vichicles required by 14 additional families Explanation: and related services l.e . Garbage, Milk, Oil, Cleaning Trucks , etc. 13f-One new intnrsectinn will be creatn;l nn Ttninn Ave Ibul traffic from this development is very minimmal . '1 (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services • in any of the following areas : y:, • (a) Fire protection? _ YES MAYBE W-O-- ;i; (b) Police protection? YES M YBE NO X `_t , (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? a,,,:• YES MAYBE NO v (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO t. (f) Other governmental services? yES M YbE NO Explanation: All new developments require additional services in relationship to their size, hut this development v uld not ;,: require additional personel to provide the above services . "! • (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: +: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO '.-, (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy; or require the development of new sources of energy? y S M YBE TO if Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE , NO (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO X (c) Water?r • YES MAYBE NO .R' to .., '..-';:.''' . . -6- •1's!, (d) Sewer or septic tanks? i , ,Ar' YES M YBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE N3— (f) Solid waste and disposal? ' . YES MAYBE NO �`, Explanation: Alt of the above mentioned utilities will. he in- .i ; stalled either at the expense o ' the developer or the utility )irnvirli n a sot-vice C P such as ,,.i, ;;'• power & natural gas . Utilities installed by developer will he dedicated to the City (17) Human Health. Will the Rent proposal result in the creation of ,••' any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding `;r..: mental health)? "` YES MAYBE N� : i• ?' r• Explanation: di t (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of Il..; ;,li.i° any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the ;4g,t; proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive 'ji';,;,, site open to public view? i YES MAYBE NO • .,;;:,; •"- - ' Explanation: '3'; ; i,:'!a (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the sr..: `'" quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? F,,.,. • YES MAYBE N- it, • ' Explanation: .'`''•' (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an "!'"` alteration of a sigriicant archeological or historical ,j; '. site, structure, object or building? - ',4 YES MAYBE N� ?, Explanation: • ' III. SIGNATURE • 1,', I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information / ' is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ,r,, .. ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should i;: there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of -full disclosure on my part. Z'; , Proponent: C) signed 4' ; ,,, CD-6, --e-4—, LTA (name printd) ' City of Renton :'' Planning Department i',�;; 5-76 j�^,1C! . v RW ' \a Affidavit of Publication FEE O�1 STATE OF WASHINGTON r -._,. �� - •r97' %� COUNTY OF KING ss. y ) .arFPre , rya_ eurfh . ._ ...__..__ .... .. .. G = ` being first duly sworn on - . . ... oath,deposes and says thatS h e is the • Chief L Z e k of IN,WASHING? THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE a newspaper published four(4) ICH 7, 1978, i times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and TO CONSIDE has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred .OWING PETIT to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- NOTICE OF'- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, .. and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained -- PUBLIC HEARING at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton RENTON LAND USE Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the • . -- - HEARING EXAMINER— .. Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING T\TO t i C e of T� b 1 i c "WILL BE HELD BY THE Washington.That the annexed is a4i . .RENTON LAND USE ;HEARING EXAMINER AT TTe S r i n .HIS REGULAR MEETING • - "IN THE COUNCIL CHAM- - .. --BERS, CITY HALL, RE- as it was published in regular issues(and NTCt 1;''.,'A:.� :Ne I'ON,ON not in-supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period MAR'::: I, a?'rl, AT 9:00• A.M. 1-":") C(.'•t;iDER THE• FOLLOWING PE'i ITIONS: of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the .. 1. MORRIS J. AND •JOAN ALHADEFF, AP- - '1 PLICATION FOR RE 24 day of l e b r'UD ry . ,19 78 ,and ending the -ZONE FROM G TO T, ' File No.R-127-78;prop- erty located at 1332 S.W. 16th Street,immediately day of ,19 both dates • west. of existing Lon-. inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- gacresTrai!er Park. scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 2 G E O R G E OBERHOLTZER, AP- - N ;- PLICATION FOR PRE- hi charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $:2,.?.7;rwch LIMINARY PLAT AP- has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the PROVAL OF 14 LOT first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent SINGLE FAMILY RESI- . insertion. • - DENCE .SUBDIVISION. // / /�/ • (WINDSTAR), File .No. .1...c[2 _f . ., .. .G ' 61;c.� . - ::--PP-132-78;.property lo- --. • sated along the east side .iof Union Avenue N.E. C rl i t-f Clerk . _ approximately.-10o feet- _ south of N.E.24th Street. , Legal descriptions on- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 day of • files noted above on file • in the Renton Planning Department. Fe r U?ry , 19..73. . ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS TO SAID PETITIONS t? l(A--. ' ARE INVITED TO BE PRE Notary Pit 1. in and for the State of W n ton, SENT AT THE PUBLIC g HEARING ON MARCH 7, residing at Kent, Ki County. 1978 AT 9:00 A.M.TO EX- PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June RENTON PLANNING 9th, 1955. DIRECTOR Published in The Renton —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, Record-Chronicle February adopted by the newspapers of the State. 24, 1978.R4795. ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: rif-Cc-s f-fioAre•••-y et--A REZONE 34-zei AJ OR PL A SITE APPROVAL ' "frIcP- 4. .../37-7c3 SHORT PLAT SPECIAL- PERMIT _ WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT - - - - PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS _YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 121/76' SIGNATURE OR INITA DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE )/0- TRAFFIC EN . X rA2/7E 2- 23-7? 7-- 7 HEALTH 1111 Z- -?REVIEWER 'S COMMENTS COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : , • D ra el n Cv A-,• /, -/,- /i :i. I sf.:74 • ,v 2..?" „ _ _ - /,;;;?Pti c N 1-4 y P 1 C•[2.- Fe:, ;•-‘ ! tifoiver-) . A-1437,5Y7&e DT' A14 C. AIARla 0 Th vekpe-e- 5-vhjc-71" 744.,,() - .51:y11S.* PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . : 16, 1978 (1) v Rfcf4'A o The City o.f Renton, Washington Municipal Building . 1 Planning Department 19� Mr. Michael Smith. ' v2 r Dear Mr,_ Smith: 2c DEpAR�� Reference is made to your letter dated December 23, 1977, regarding theWINDSiAR TENTATIVE 'PLAT NO. 0J3-77, which has been submitted to your Office by Mr, George Oberholtzer, Reference is also made to my visit to your Office on January 9, 1978 regarding the above mentioned Plat .. During this visit, I advised that I did not desire to have the remaining unsold portion of tax lot #9036 designated "10t number 15" on the Preliminary Plat, as stated in paragraph 4 of your above referenced letter, for the following reasons: (a) I do not intend to have the remaining, unsold portion of tax lot n9036 platted at this time, or in the near forseeable future . (b) The Recorded Glencoe Division #5 Final Plat Drawing, (-Sheet #2 of 2) , designates the remaining unsold portion of tax lot #9036, TRACT "A" Weinberg Property. This designation must be retained. You agreed with me that the requirement of paragraph 4 of your letter of December 23, 1977, would be revised to designate the remaining unsold portion of tax lot #9036 as TRACT "A" Weinberg Property, on the preliminary plat map, drawing. Mr. Oberholtzer visited my home on the afternoon of January 9, 1978.. During this visit, your letter of December 23, 1977, and the WIi'DS AR TENTATIVE PLAT 'Drawing (Sheet #1 of 1) , and also the recorded McGrath Development Corporation, Glencoe Division #5 Plat Drawing (Sheet #2 of 2), Final Plat, were reviewed by him, myself, and my wife. Mr. Oberholtzer agreed with me and my wife that the extent of the Preliminary Wi1'DSTAR PLAT would be limited to the 14 lots as shown on my drawing, dated March 21, 1977, latest revision September 26, 1977, which shows my property tax lots #9036 & #9040. It was also agreed that the Preliminary Plat Drawing of the proposed -1- January 16, 1978 (2) The City of Renton, Washington WINDSTAR PLAT NO . 093-77, would retain the designation of (TRACT "A" Weinberg, Property) as is now shown of the recorded McGrath Development Corporation Glencoe #5 Final Plat Drawing, ( Sheet #2 of 2) . This letter is written in confirmation of the agreements regarding the above matters ; which have been arrived at between yourself, the Weinbergs and Mr. 0berholtzer. C4 � Lowell Co. Weinberg cc (2) Mr. Oberhlotzer 14439 - 143rd. Place S. E. Renton, Washington. 98055 •/1 RECEII; fl � JAN 16 ic,7p • ';�pEpNR` , ' °'`s: hibit, (E) , J . Covenants, Restrictions and Reset .,,ions . .F The premises shall be subject to the easements, restr onp( 41/1 <C T,reservations of record, and ftrrther shall be subject to ,tri�s t, O `' , and reservations which are to be included in the deed of .wive nce1949 Z r,. '. herein as follows ; OpPARTt '" (1) There is to be a ten (10 ' ) foot screening easement a ,, rear of all lots, no structure is to be built, or placed in the ten (10 ) „ G r,•'1; foot easement area. 'A i ��:� (2) The property is to be used exclusively for residential purposes, + t4? fit:'.:q. "'' single family homes, having a minimum of three bedrooms, with attached A , • two car garage , a minimum of FOURTEEN HUNDRED square foot of living area, f ,,t exclusive of the garage area, and having a minimum of one full bathroom, rtt , ;;,, • and one half bathe No mobile homes will be permitted . •h rtr.;�; tiG"' (3) No accumulation of inoperative automobiles, recreation vehicles, 3-i',< or trucks, or the components thereof, or other junk will be permitted. ,e',,.,. (4) Any dwelling or structure erected or placed on any lot shall be '" 0 Y+,�-t completed as to external apperance , including the finished painting, trithinA 't''/' , •, : nine months from date of commencement of construction and shall be s�'{" connected: to public sewer. ,i" ' ly.k{{ , �Ifi•t. (5 ) No animals, livestock, or poultry or any kind 'shall be raised, Yg e:'A, bred, or kept on any lot, except that dogs, cats, or other household pets k+ ;, may be kept in compliance with existing and regulations and provided �r� laws p V� } ;` that they are not kept, bred, or maintained for commercial purposes . The foregoing is intended to exclude the keeping of any pets , such as dogs, 1' a �r' or cats or ,birds, in numbers ' under conditions reasonably objectionable , i^ r;t;. Sri in the closely—built-up residential community. • ;;ter ,$ y, rao :fi• �� (� CC' � r Ft o THE CITY OF RENTON 0 ' 2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT /3 0' 235-2550 04TED SEPA*.�O December 23 , 1977 George Oberholtzer 14439 - 143rd Place S . E . Renton , Washington 98055 RE : WINDSTAR TENTATIVE PLAT NO. 093-77 Dear Mr. Oberholtzer: The various municipal departments have reviewed the proposed tentative plat and approved it subject to the following con- ditions : 1 . The proposed cul -de-sac exceeds the maximum 500 foot cul -de-sac length established in -the Subdivi - sion Ordinance . Written request for an exception tc the Ordinance explaining the rationale for such request must be submitted to the Hearing Examiner at the time of preliminary plat approval applica- • tion. 2 . The sidewalk at the end of the cul -de-sac should be designed against the curb with the planter strip located between the sidewalk and north property line . This area should be planted in evergreen trees as part of plat improvements to provide an adequate buffer between the proposed cul -de-sac and the residential lots to the north . 3 . Streets and utilities plans , together with various utility charges , should be coordinated with the Utilities and Engineering Divisions . 4. The lot with the existing residence must be designated as lot number 15 on the preliminary plat map . 5 . All existing trees shall be retained on the site and incorporated as much as possible into all phases of plat design and construction . No clearing and grading of the site shall commence until after preliminary plat approval . . i- George Oberholtzer December 23 , 1977 Page Two 6 . A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact has been issued for the subject proposal pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act. (See attached. ) You may at your convenience prepare and submit the required information for preliminary plat approval based upon the above comments and conditions . If you have any further questions , please contact this department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Directo -� Michael L . Smith MLS :wr Attachment cc : Lowell Weinberg Townsend - Chastain & Associates , Inc . PROPOSED/FINAL DL%;LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NuN-SIGNIFICANCE • • Tentative Plat Application No . No. 093-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration • ;Environmental Checklist No ., ECF-287-77 ® FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Application for tentative plat approval for 14 lot subdivision. • Proponent / • GEORGE OBERHOLTZER • Location of Proposal N . E. 24th Street and Union Avenue N. E . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is • x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was Mae after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and .other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance:. The delcaration is based upon the retention of as many signi • ficant trees on the site as possible and incorporating them into plat design and development. • • • Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would Withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) . declaration of non-significance : • Responsible Official Michael L . Smith Title Associate Planner Date December 23 , 1977 Signature /44 • City of Renton .ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED ( `L/� , PLEASE REVIEW THI'S APPLICATION FOR: REZONE CrooltzrE Rs}e � �Y� %i MAJOR PLA riDLi']_ rode- SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER • SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION • AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT • WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE /07.7 7 • t L✓R.1 r�rr SIGNATURE OR INI A' DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE BUILDING ///7 ? 2723 TRAFrI C ENG // _ Zz _ 7 ENGINEECG d� // bd/ 7 , • ° FIRE dk/23/917 HEALTH �✓/ V�� }�� %/—/7- J REVIEWER ' S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : • PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . : , , . ' g I ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department " OPark Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div .8 Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 2_u7 - 77 ; Application No . : O`(3-77 Action Name : G1tcjt: cF,6G -;k Lrac.lam. (ZrK)i--'dose rA r Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : C---rtJ c n eev( `. j Comments : lid o kjr ��-iW`...5 S.....1oJCc.'1-- . • "- 0. ; ea -.11--- Si 0_0,Nr-a,Ii ou- ( 04- , LA. I'''e I , -- (i) 6:1-44-- . 9,-;-, 4 4-____ H/4/7, Signature of Director or 6uthorii Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ` Department : ortLir,%� Comments : %A•-.n H5 /3/,GsL. — s-r-co OtIL., ri"-5 l If/£S //-/.771 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 (OVER) 111 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ' Department : c ‘CLE , Comments : NCa Cab pil\N®vJ — Sx1 c 'to Q\off cA rRs-AovnSe..V ' /'► , Signature of Dire t r or or ' Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date