Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA86-042 Or A. K��j, ' Veterans Korea BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT %` �e Q ic z & ZO PARTMENT -- t;,. 3.: `; 200 Mill Avenue South = ` 9 Renton, Washington 98055 rf0 seP1 Ur KA. �,1,� i ihVeteransKorea o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT x "` �'€ +- z s 200 Mill Avenue South �. w, , ,�,s 9A Renton, Washington 98055 �' usn22 o9., SEPSE..# • !VICINITY MAP_:,, Cob.Was AV 54'ltrpe8p A44. I rt fire --11 ISe'-m' SIT, 142'-d DN.. 74',1.• ReN°N i.;ion... IDYNALF MYaMUi � I • • 1 U•' �6�� xL yy I L`IRSI.LINt 463.u+' _ ll9 �TaE+W ru,M.. • v b�RAPW •4- Th r - __ '.1 g 11::,,c. ' t• '° ®°7lVno`Ti.A4MALTo C•41. _ • FcpnPACTEp M46 V ` Y- �Upty/PP` /• wliwf° 3 M L �. IL 56415¢g•IG5'-O' �� VlR6'lP�oNG.Tk, ' flla RO I " Q I SanR+4.— jMj 1 r#_b-d lo,o. MLp' V_r—o'5' 14,o' 20'-O' S�211' _ ] �� "N rnlr. j ) vD- r —r I_ 'PROPOSED RESTAURANT ,� d.d n.w `!" •4LLL••• ga' AIIecp'} 24ip" F',-, 1_{y. J IAn .L- fiN.rL.aeV.•2+.0',ciEe SIIT.e l xNuowRe 2. ( p`T N � pf4IL I > S r ; aiJ .� e _ w1PtxKO e- 3a JO L- o4 la I� I .rn• ` 5 0 �I J • r 0 L I LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 Nuili z° o MI �� dLoy 1 of sl,ert 91e 11-.1 m _J e...as Follws.y i ". , g �i I l,d...A1 a {T_-h_ portion f the se ref the...east I W `I1 v m _ _ •r m J ,r,.,...\ - I i I j v t'r..n L;ci°angl�x�:i:nin9w�;'Dae.�rr'im°a e 4'E4RANp Arse. > u • /y tale NyA smaz. 0•, ml om, e 111 a lb LOOP Q O J Q a V' • �<N 1)La9gt W I'1wN� '� ' w Beginning at a point Alien 1N°iso and[e°i center V o•NcanJ111i C v J {r' a;ILhu°ol"rrvcWnO.� 1 _ © �. $' t;lineeof,a s ' e o q �' 41P c1 1 N • SNalong m a r"nr°c` a Denuum,tract wiem,�'eyeea°ie1 '�u' v , / hl l o 4' roree ens.:A„dicoi o rl�xo.alagsel9y. 6 u - ei _ N ILHi S�(D 4t) J (]. t• .—p m N I Q e set,more or me l/`�.,� Y' , \ y enlme�yfstatn Hity Superior ghway No. .n x.earl line ` ° ;o'4iR vwv[NAY '"- l--a1j _ ••• ` 4--OPY-weir-txp•-•.1 _:,I. _ o said Westerly L to the Northli I ' �� - v - Northerly along saidmt quarter of in t Cause Ma. he the Nora n.as ter° RE19nDRN - q m quarter.thence long mead m c°.line Southeast LW RP,—1 : u -`j' 4 1 point of lb-ginning; Siaaid Section cent. cenr tttphat n..somwith. ly to N te�il •_�• y1'd�e II¢9'•M p• S. __- 1169'•99'-0' S 1169•990 S1. B Southeast RASP VAL.ROApl�tacevr ,NN t es N=d the the Southlline ti•parallel with the North line. l y�•Pe I , ;PROJECT DATA _.[ e Area- 6.011 q.rt. / I - fm�n:ea�'.a-Amt.°rent q'r 'TM�mow,g� __�y r LWE sti.w' I rot rrOexelmJ bats,(6 c) I,z<Ld vl e 14 . WE,<E<oND nfANs p1 APP.To y Apluali p cy- sceurent-A1,1 .- bre To De TNAU 6.151.PANAuN Mont IARMINA LOT.Ac.ess 'N6 LpT Occupant lama-Restaurant-Ile Seats ITE.PLAN iPP18NT To De ruso ANp ...Fe.'COY pWPtRTT oNN emeemcta :a ieaiine-v-1 hr.H.h EF m rype ' 'p _ t laid nun. u To pUTAN'Y. - *'44L8 qI SM.M°GU,51xb, Building Area-Allowable with 1 sates separation. . _ ramnl47Cp[a+t _sw.Np.to nrur(cj e'.�.14b gd war - I_ .A rm:T1:1l IS,wt m.PT. (•i, "' r`.00 l 1T0 ,rsO mIe NA<PN e FNE eoldq Height-Allowable l 1 Max. OO fOLS u/.4 !Plod,. yre o °'p-o- c geram'-tr - Y.- •• •. Qa SOT.c1 PAR 5118 4RARN4 i 91.I1/A4e No.of acoce -2 0,0Mp nm--•1M UAW•]sNArn LA. Perking- - _.: .. "5•-^. _.f ee: Required• D ND compact) ptet� • Actual Iri ewgect. N.C.) Valuation uon- O 55Ib' S rni 4d 11 62CI;. D�� • syI� ; , IT +I c -40:_: u>tpNe.NaR roNsot.TOO ReOUiPep rNR°o„N°r.ve .MeTRU.1I.1 NTF6.5 sNT.at. " •- / It b..F1RCT 7boob DY<TEn reA f,ce PiatTttENT 5PRIN.LER case,'140.211.17 244Sdf, .. _ sef 190 511L N°re5 RCL°N. F • -ii loTV11E RIT Hft R.1+58 P1Rt rwttIT1°N Pugs lo ur! ® poR Po e.P..FAN.T.H.TAPATI°N y� General ��q,� I. verify allal>vloea!e the field ms'mil:EavA' .yz�19.o;Q17a p11 0 - er ct z to v y eaernpmeaea shell De GE �,o _-*j - Prior to to construction....ion of theArchitect. - n ,°,iB1:m�kman0 SIl.b materials w the Q' ® _of tan uniform Building cede all applicable city [•1 °"imt ter°O°: De.q�aee.e to en KW r•Almw mac. I.. IOI I ..�. I I i:tiomien taw md`.pprw.l prior m an.t.l- w '!� o eluotoio nA 1 PAN.EV 1.1N.T / ' '.,„p - o¢l trieel Id 10'1N tle1NNT / O yr4 l:11rdY�e1 P�•I Ay1 I iirmhenrttlere • 0 • Al i _ Y O o Landscaping Sprinklers v 6 I N ,µ�.� pJ�' Sys o6eeman•9N _— • 1'�p �V- `�',off .. • �... Omer, �D18C1 x. 11• 9i166Meck • • nr : A''''"'" o 1140.tea Arr 9 x z Ip) 4;:..n so,oil A.1A0 ef.list O ts ,A0,. ° e ,p _A •'. • 'ENERGY ANALYSIS z • aa_to r _v noQ� •v 19e6 xis Dan tan Stet.energy I �* ee®.ry cpmpanmc perfore.nre�roern 1 Chapter II 0 in I I .�cim -1eT,5T8 en/nt. 5 Q I pee ulrel.t�n.�fe�•. t1'"�or°at - 0- 3 em �— ;a; Insulation•_par lim n A .um-.-ll Batt. z j dwn m Lon-i D Rigid. yy O W I ' - extend d •A-19 top -ling. = O q °r R-11 Rigid. YI z • O=OROIOI( ; Q.MG7LIOZOZOZO�CO o 01010 6 Oo 0 O ,F 3T -Gists,' -All windows.he Doibie Rigid' g4 ' 9 Tw0 11A:.:. IG. . ? .: Rai below �l.red. V01 m TIM.ArrAToet n�.+reo +^ew.,1.sN NY6� I SHEET INDEX TO MATCH AD1gtfNr cy,,,I,K.v.4 — LANDSCAPING PLAN+ ueSOAnDER STYRA.IP UA O 01 HU4p`n ANos' n 61.First:oar Landscape°1�'d Project°°t°' o I,�, 94ReT Un (1•eNnrcL) ndw rMe (Y.') RN elevations and 4ctaava °•5.19-85 µL 6asl,pn15 TA 51','914 e889.5UR9I ...LT Dees and Details +PRINI`LER r 'I� PINU5 TN9NDeF4Il ®turn gcnoW-DONDe615(!L') y de.. v.1.17 To cmr a FENryN T.R 4., lni.h Schedules.De411a API1oV.,PRIOR To N<TALLATIcN. - 61 WANtue D1u.Y•PII (G-lo') �DeuNhW fDellte�N eft 1 R..n AF.TMrAtNTLs.UVA-URM CD.4W1I.ecyrARla Ucall.TDN<I0`RNp6y,• a R1bp°pt,"-eLUBTIr(3L') al Sod 11000 t°ifloor ecevasg FIWIRINNIcl,(We 29.OL) CD. 'fru., .I..4. E°AF (6,1o.) off l55eein9 am oeteal• Job ///i PArND.NcsA TERttlNu.ls(We 1+'d.c.) Aw rv�NrlNa uer+.r Fkleve s Structural Details - 1 6)11.Np.R. C• P 1 TRCMUL01P65 ,°ap.fi nlll<N ` structural `e"• A 1 J�. cop ¢4LDI4 AdTEN (L'6') . M iILRICAINAa1 rug • REY19101119 BY ffia ,, IB �. _ _ IIIII ' 4avNf/fFfE1eF ®_ I® — i I' m _ arFE.raucwrr _� _— LN�. IIil Ill 1 I� I . 'a a _ mJn. _ .I _�i_'°=h"'s ell 7' r i j 11 1. ' 1 j . 1 I ;llilf y7'' I _ HU i—' I I \ / 1 Ell _ I� _ • ®® I 0�e j _1 II II '0H II n® j fIHT IWL LEJ4L[p _ 1 j `' I \ — __ "fIP9t - —®��— ®�� i11 N am' �i'l 11 Ili I_-.ll . .I Ili"..A 1 Lilj i a \�n 11 uI, u ae o tD a • < 11 'WEST ELEVATION 'NORTH ELEVATION" A 81,...Owl f.T fLMR ELEJ.O'O• q N N 5IZEB ®/ - -__ II I _ P'ENv./ ,,bs III_ A� �� ^�v=LtJEL +T y,pLL OM I`��+TMF 'rill% �2 11.:LevELl `` lil Iv!iii ILIi .! 1' �� x, _'i =ter - — _ '� -/aa.a�irineux IIII I �•FIHT FLIIR WEL i{Li1 u 1 — II!' __� o l l III I I — I———— _ — I I -L. ti 5L�0 % \% \`ti L II I I Kr 11_— _ '' 1 I• KRYIFEME4Th boo r • �a • SOUTH ELEVATION 'EAST ELEVATION I. g•Ir igo .AO P Q . F. W 07 • 12 RIG4E s., TI _ P f♦ VUTE 09=E' x > IT x Z a Ix `x.v fa pla4 Fl.•a$n=• I I I �- fwe�r•I=a" om x z rnq 0'.:64 a r:A 14',Tfe i�4 uffia I offW6 IxAM .�•.N T'a4 H4avue i 6 iD rF.*ll'o" ® 4 I�/I► TI1 — 14 y t t a t t , rI�I �I 5 D'a'�MR I �iC 19I'B• �O i • II RIIII114 a II-f RPIM4 A Pi/1A*IBT016,1 41 crf•6 Roan EN;W17-1, ( n41FT stlaf 04 O li oNI/I4 4 l�1 ., rrlig da L7 F. 5�•0' 1ov N v+8 = = - _ _ - _ I-5LL/•flF.' 6 N H L1 ' J. ii 1 I c'�N�o'.a O z • MV+ -.•4'4/T I a gM�rL. r j wle,;,..'o• cil a' SECTION A-A ;SECTION B-B 5-19-86 - - ;;.Ita' lyILd feu. .•-A4 REVISIONS BY AT SU-d y 'St." mt.,. 5-Id ° L 50 d- _ I _ 1 ,ii # fig • ,� / / I S Ia eaRte % q '` r BOB-BR BY-EVAVT[oNTMAL1oc a s, • � �)p, O2 , VJ'sP.ny sY Te.wG+1 G.iy+r° a] u - f , . ..�. _ _ 4 G.Lo u 4gl�ve M�i�?uF/ / i Q P .I_ o.ws•-ram ra , -L----_--_------_-----_i 1 .4°, m • .k_il I 5 a 1 S-o ttt a'TT .:`'' I. 5M 90 I ;� `1- 1 51 oo'_- `2 4,,2oL TT 5 a' 1 Tff L ' '."" i•: (•'.. J ' ,,FLOOR PLAN T /'•1.-d FOUNDATION PLAN a ' .. "° -d i 5-d 1 0 _/� t @-J _ = I I - I - III*II IIII Olillfliil --'' II it • SOUTH ELEVATION IB^.;e' WEST ELEVATION a_r-d EAST ELEVATION ve.;d• -NORTH ELEVATION v.'•r.d E. w<..AG,V FL... — z 'B GG 621 v..P1.ti I . el,:ntr.e.'" T- • Y I 5"Wce MP.G'•ti. FxuPx¢isi.ra;'45C �° EN I wiutof PGc �ProG�qli '� IIIIIPAIIIIIIII/ Bui.i-Up Weer. -•° frith.' _ma 7[ci a.' I +A(/MT. ©w��a1 + II af�p.H�,•YumPi ca.,snap 1 9••3w weK s4 F'w¢xwi GIRM _I ' _! 'lIUiiniaiaiiuiu.i . er� I _ I� a ,I� s, _ _ ._ _. _. _�• E111111i1�� :.S,,.rA,F.aw-rcr. ©SCUPPERAla SCUPPER 5t• rw°c♦ Gr.Y °� ° I X z =1 'ROOF PLAN y'-i-d IIEFLECTED CEILING PLAN z +�� m z sod 1 c7 co u etzm..Gm. I 7❑ al -0a -B .eeo�o w°.. III n%(ZhX{tl..T.rYr:II�,i �a"°` O •- F ��F wc. •A`p us. 1 II ' I IY.11■ - mom.- iee :,Yr u 1� I,iia� .a 5 u.5-19.86 '"'' ' ROOF FRAMING PLANf'.r.1 a 1Yn c H U WM.b aH resal.: e. BUILDING SECTION u'.e-a -=-.e+°••.,.......'AYTM4W- A a O AI • • NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL CONSTRUCTION SEQ(IENCE AVPROVED BY CITY OF RENTON •�l:'r••, IN/TALL ROCK CLUCK PARR, 'MILL EA<ff ( ft<T Farces ,S1�..^•••�.-'''". U.INSTALL PRPERGROwp PT/L/Tit:! J.Gu f/IN CV F/x/1N GRAPE `+. w.fEEP•OR Pls'ERWICE 1T.4BIL/XE EX<efep f0/Lf • - �• - f A/ENE./T ANP AfPNA2r SVRFACEf Ey i REMIVE /LATER/H CRO1/ON CONTROL FFAT/rCEj /<*w. nii.P� /i.. ,..i/ ,! `1`_- ... '• t al • •••f0' RceE.rr<,xe j •E N_II.N. r1 ro _.i • t \ fit V 1KLL / I jil _ . , 414 A' / % / � y t I\ •v.E °s/ t• II:lA ./YEia. illrcTi rli�o\ f% i O -fYP/4L /CE PEM/L X ! (pp I 1 0+ ff e-•- ,fi i �` ief .,...,•,.....y • // I ,i{e 1i.°F • I ...i P -I to In L2 CDM 11, I r I yo,v,..-4.z.-swiral.: [.. / o R I P r"-- 12 z • ;I I / o c u r( ; NI r PROPOSED RESTAURANT i I V1 W Fa�,N n>f rn N '} / /irA/L /NTRANI AOCR eNECK pRH , ° A,_,rK't.•. ill',%,. VICINITY MAP a a / ( frRAV O Lff .. .:: ''• _..c R ...� awes.. �a.R.E.X a aPn.lE<n+_W,wol�!i?G cCa.cyx„,w.,aEa w les•.t•,R �N �`r L.O/N6 AREA I if ;II 8 II• I \ \ `irow/R 6K � • \ ' MAY/HPH W [ � - c-, vtvw.,4. .o.g,s. ---w"" 0,r,: '/ P a..Y I o q +a1 I , 1 I \ \� sv, \ �- w I t.- \illi '-o` re `, N `enTI It. i +, • c to I / b azC u � VJ w.. s r \ f\�� __ Ix Z • `< I- r t \ I _ i 'i1` / foi \ \ - - ��s..— — A.um.• oz __ u.ar ;ES,wait El :" e I AC I I 11 w� t:/ a/ � I t, 1 yT I,Abo. I 3 ^ .L 1 �' HM 911, f�\ ' yl I. I L I tf `•y. Sf �'°` / �' \ -• INS>AGt /x1ER/M Nal is'�i¢un is to P 1 .t �t° ? a5 '� -. ]) T/CT FENCE • milm I .1..------'''''''''' \-- ��,��., ��,� �' ...o,.• .�•w,<. �15 • II ; Er/fnwb Vows; --- i.OAT/ - APv4OX[CORDON of 3 I jr • .r" .a.•..,.E _„ I E RIOTING PKAINACE CNANNE< aw+n�t..+ C rue.ic wms. vcu or+,a , I 1 a•ARr 1n.Lf ors., ..''a.7,.J ` ° I a A R r.r t_' r•: •. -' �W°i .`,• �`1_a1.W .�A.,xe ea.•r..0o2 wait •a•ruh..r nK°awt+nxr I 3..... ... x.Wr.w.rw..,2 `� f sR+ :•. "! °S-7 - L4.�" _ N _ a.<.oA..r.a...P r.R. , _ r.... /. nfT,wA �' _- - �i ar v r:_-•.�'1 • •1,�:r/ erxa ; C as o \ r r a,x. IOrfaK f t•Te lO• j . -.- .•x a•r 7 Of - EXISTING CVARNE/. OWREY flgtl5 •i Ar l. I� m n n..„<+max,.Pw•Ac rvw, a'' N O ELEVATIONSECTION c• 3 ROCK CHECK DAM DETAILCC ewaowammnr<nn,tmx.at of ww \ 6. • � _ /,/i• .e.oo, v/od i evie • O p E m �F--�i s! a PLAN VIEW a.m.. n r°'u • �,� ...loa et.e�•a r.u. ++nu�iw �tammx,r U fn a ,vrea ro avi ii.Ii.i we d•u:"ot:°.�:'u"e:ri.:.ii n u.e u m, �` •...••�. s��y o F m' j p oo = `n R7V/NG AND EXTRUDED CURB DETAIL C CO cz w° • h I If !�i.�,..ie wR1 H<a�. .ttrtt I:1°ia .i/ ' c -.,,IN .....t..x q a....SPEIr at.t w.w.°r<.a.+ta<a.. .t ot.w:.a.o.'. c C C.)' 2Q �R ye RI 1�, • G Qe U g Fi/ri/odic • A' :�`-� ... t . [ •t. ... ..'l.L ia��,J t.°m.,.na°. °• - ' m Im..<. w.+o sr...<..e..riw ro.;, O O N w- -Kir e a 5 5,roo eo•/o “Ar."-:I • LS, ' �� o ¢- e:e -roc.. 'f:j F...0"ii I�'•i ...�.... / .✓ • . ,Ra u >o `/d EBE� :e.�• I feet - �� 7 =m w o '90�%f.TNN Pea...,/ i ij I - ••...a.<..,.e m..t..•.... ..e• ..a O N•- ¢ .c k� - - ►� .<� O (A Jm oc 'OE 1 v K ry d < <P' vE v - Or�w ' e a^ae w� c n <P 0 S / i//R it � �'ro � �• L F- 2 O- O d- ::tl • ERz • e•.Ti•• a.et t••r"i4.:°°• ."`"" r I,c uIY.. - •m..son.�•w•..s JCR No .c-cat= a !:,.• y s •t°n.o s w. E/./t�.v"'cM t.`f.� f.et...tw..- �! si I h•xcxu •"tt fE y: SCALE /-.zo• . - •:P.~� :•° nJ IK Iwc [can ttt••tat• • :•:- • ,w•.w,•E. DESIGNEDCb,. .s. v i :�:r +rsnn,o. DRAFTED FABRIC FENCE DETAIL g"< oxW�<�p' °P:E~ Nr STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ••n..-wai. .•o+m. CHECKED. R. • r •t t ir/,7_r:ey°',_.^.'.."' NT.s. APPROVED.. -^• STORM ORA111AGE CONTROL MR No 3 Lm.,+n a.e, - ,am<<,.,a%:°4, a DATE, 5-/5-8¢ : V. w exa<.uu+ r NOTE:fOPO$RAPNy,f?E PLAN i LEGAL fliPPL/EO BY OL1ENf SHEET SEE SNEET 2 FAX WATER/NN.Ti1N/4RY CUWL(S• . I _ .�.1 • aa.Aa ao PnE<oA P.Pw.<,e or 2 'VICINITY MAP'yam REVISIONS eV ya'.O eee ENvlrt FINE { 5410. So'-d p.w. A e1'-o- 110'-0'6Lpt,. TI'-'1•. /Jt\ NE N oN In/f..i 4'Lrfee4O M6. I 1 ,9 l a `FVt.•1,�.� 41PLNALIL YVMNi I Id.l1'1MW tN•. K- Ja �t 'e6 Sr.,.LINt 4o6.lel RR 000.N.•A ' b�/!AK ¢ - ` PROPOSED --- _ - . CONVENIENCE I �f---T M�LLLtL SiuJ.�0•I'*xs -11 • I F,� / _-,1 • F 12 -^IrF 1 • G • V -a '• Lda'•51-d t (}�c ," 63 I ��JJ LNATIpF( . �•,,n O I ., 11 a- LAL dam at MOO ( I • N €g �I I WFNYMIi / wM .s s °i p LaJIL ca- "N v11f. uJ II I77T-A. Sn k+pe • y 1, r 24'•p' 4,4 lave''-J•Ba'•d {a1 w:d { ao=a' 15 c N[RN soNp. o u •� et 1 1 J nIN 1 alAS w. y 1I w, T L- L L L c L L L 1 m u �j • PROPOSED RESTAURANT III J W " OI DN.R. ci v.••g6.o'•see 5N6Ef L•I E V _ N " No _ 6 a LEGAL DESCRIPTION 411 11 // i. a1 • u t; SI ® © ; u I' Inc 1 of short Plat o14-[1 Described m Follows. That CO • DI Ci p Chi 98 9'•BI=O' �5'1 • •. -11 1N quarter of eslr`nlr9leouncY.eWe ptn9ten,t quarter t4°i°crSpeE as the •t m o 4'`RPJ4/P AJtl. > ('. Oi S A6lui _ I u Sotto..:f a NlA K Q 1 r To store r.W! V 6yg1°nf ga at a le Sec°Oele° lep°is°2 0 feet x°rNcenter D w_CANosLM914 9 { N �.4 1 . as ° Corner thereof:thence North e9eord"' ' 01 N ,0 11,]'+), south 11m of a actconveyedY y m Iggelffl '•*,;t,�_ a {it' I. p`-—1 `r o ° C romee weer Audht itor's °11656e1Y a°alri '�"<'O• � / I. Zo—, R WY. `® ?I ° •N �rlmmev of 275 feet,more or up`ne�i alm:vi°z[�.u.ee9c the s ev etldnelnl[Lnyfnre ii y Q J J_,sr,I',, 'P."'„� sp'ulve vllveLt. /`� !1 9 u orc Northerly.long said Westerly line to the Nort ro 3 \-' y Ix.le 11.c '�W IY'R nn IAavwL- LR06 11f!!R '�• 4'�'41e0talf _„ 0 41pe ,9 O livehef.and 6outhw•t quelmr a[Ne 6eutbees L Y RENW 7a...1 .c7 / V 1 Westerly along eela North line to u p -- 0 aid`Sectioon°center lino;thence Sou W•., 0/Ad Nos 1 • * _ __ - !='lg1c..WLk LTYf--� I Po1nc vi Nat portionrwiRlntna a 16- 1 .•. iq.66'-L' 4 O[9)TL=o' - • 2va c'Ivs]vuza aowle • • ; ^ NLN FIPt NYCRANf \� Z.�j,`p� j, u Oa V b'd lim°.°rtnv south line Rmallel v1N N°u°rN tins. X 2°' ® '^ PROJECT DATA - - l' JJ ell�.]t. 1I 1 1./.P.LWE:,.57L W' y Proposed Use- c with separate convenience `24'-d pRJE store Orap ty- mcm T is ApNaPlif enlenee s - • M1FI-IN4 Lpi Occupant Mad- era[16 seat. ce rati — E PLAN tlpn ype e ° V- lh W- iW. 14idB n°tru wnlence stare_-AYitelTli GYG nL z te ild...Area-Allowah . 2 sides separati°n c dNL_ -zwANpuo 9'.to' ]s Ft.n1,1(4)te.eaa.," ][6q.e(IIII-1 -MAW..5'•t6'• �10,fi1s eoo`P�ivtlt t venlence`6tore- 50 Eq.eAllwNle-l5.91ar-2'Yr4 i. naN e!F WC Ni•O Pa“4/0 s:t 8RNO1 To DE sNagia Bu11 g g`- tual-l4•-11-1/2•Mom average O.O 6Ct Lt/wVeu[F1i1J0i a m f ciSEE 4NL LI FLR 611E 6N+aN6 saINA4t o r• p .gel • Qi 60aVND nro,Pa02Lt T)T LI4NI•75 LLgM CA. parsing-sequlred-115 115 compact) tual ITI Me comp t,1 N-c-) • 0 e Contractor to verify all dyimenefone in th field �41I 1551we , 0 � __ _L I I I (.—' - - + u_ere a.. �r..mr,:rt°.eAeparim°.ne11 be brought to the of Renton codes. __ - �aletn9`rme.na elilepmeliretacitybe vubmiitee to'R�mIREo i \ �/ v.. _ Ila far revawm pp avier ce imt:l`yF.a _I( le,n.ar o PlumbingNILTI.t:6Lof P4_tVa ® nWooeQ4101F06Lg0 I ) 1"saQo•,,rL. __ f. a Menage g p nW1er. Q 'NZ• r Amer: t S•• ?0:`:�::�• - : 1 ®--- seaeue,WA`ile°11iss (/) r' 1 - Arehltact:l NU ArclhltercA�ac {{, ••z _...V.Lv MAN._ Sea m t Ne R.tail y 626e19111A99109Yt• • IQ_ IENERGY ANALYSIS IOl 966 Washington StateNoMel to VComponent °ante ApproaN 1 Chap r 4I• Summary-Allowable Beat lam-MILMMI,ISMPS MUM. h• j - )see mmnlmmn.far fu<cnevfn atmeuonl Z�� .alatlon ho�e1.Nor In x o] 0 clan-A- ..• eerimter 51ee own�letion 3R of 1i`Sg�la. IWIiMil e+ SP extend -R-10 Spa tri -Roof 0.eub� ,C�'/C•.'� -Glazing All wind ows-Wall below Grade-R-11 Batt or R-1 Stone mu°a-filar . 0 .. _ D3 O e y QQi O - l F. + ISHEETINDEX cc cs LANDSCAPING PLAN. 0 Lb4PAMLCR CTYRALIFLYA O nNu nll8o•nanaps' r Plmn`•°O Plm and Prel "°`°° ®N IS,�, CCTFT NH HN4P FINE o.•5-19-86 Cl' CC4C lnN4 IS 68 SMWkt[QtO.81188)l •0 Plan and lls Pr8Uz 4N6N8LR611 RlepaP[NproN-6PIJDLLLS Finish Schedule,be 5lfINk.0B AYoui 1 MT r/F.rM 6,8 WAN WE tNALR r1rt. Door rota. s.a. ATPReJAL nyoR To 0411,140I01/, 51 General Notes and DetailsD..a §a:55 Ardt0sTA111}104 UNA-NRK 0 G141:f:am.7 40tati—rw8aIA' O RN°pnpENPRoN•d,IIHIT oivfloor°hst Detailsi°9 F.8418 0188 YLLLO ALASRA FpAR 2s000tRFrminy�'° 'ee S.//// rf.h.kpr+•1llnlµuls . r✓NrINa ARfi+.to FCLIcvE ss Structural at.f1 FALNYL.NPPA °• "reW 1REn JLPI PF/e I'�pQ p.lk t11lU,N DI QIN/Ws 1 P0A1NA141x NAN S°�A 1 .. ' zoP pYNtlN4 ASPtN OS SITt urIL1TIL4 # IT. BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE 001 UkfULP 14 I 4- 1 i ,,. ; ! , ;,..\r OF R�4, ;� es °z . BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9,0 co. 0,9g 1 r€D SEP1°* BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 17 , 1986 TO: MAXINE MOTOR, CITY CLERK FROMC�.00GER J. BLAYLOCK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: MLA ARCHITECTS (SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT) SA-042-86 The attached yellow .file is being transmitted to the City Clerk for permanent records. The Site Plan Review Committee on Tuesday, August 19th, 1986, ' approved with conditions the site plan for MLA Architects. The Committee report was formally issued on August 19, 1986 . The appeal period expired on Tuesday, September 2 , 1986, without an appeal being submitted. RJB:jg fpcs.o.FF1.]MY OF ReNTo�y Public Notice Public Notice NOTICE OF SA-042-86; property located on the ENVIRONMENTAL east side of the 3600 block of East DETERMINATION Valley Road. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE TEXACO REFINING AND MARKET- RENTON,T WASHINGTON ING, INC. (ECF-062-86) AFFIDAVIT OF PUB B The Environmental Review Committee Application for conditional use permit to (ERC) has issued a declaration of non- extend pump island and canopy 14 feet significance for the following projects with west and replacing existing dispensers additional conditions imposed as mitigat- with two 4-product and two 3-product Audrey DeJoie , being first duly ; ing measures under their authority of dispensers, file CU-070-86; property he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Section 4-2822(D)of the Renton Municipal located 1408 Bronson Way North. Code: Further information regarding this action COMMERCIAL DESIGN ASSOC. is available in the Building and Zoning �T c�7 (ECF-040-86) Department, Municipal Building, Renton, VALLEY lr Fwsp Application for site plan approval to Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of �i allow the construction of two one story ERC action must be filed with the Renton buildings having approximately 11,688 Hearing Examiner by September 1, 1986. Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chroni square feet on 1.03 acres,file SA-041- Published in the Daily Record Chronicle 86;property located northeast corner of August 18, 1986. R1781. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a IA intersection of Strander Blvd.extension are legal newspapers and are now and haN Road. 27th Street) and West Valley months prior to the date of publication refern in the English language continually as daily MLA ARCHITECTS (SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT) (ECF- County, Washington. Valley Newspapers ha 041-86) newspapers by order of the Superior Court of Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a restaurant King County. approximately 14,174 square feet,file The notice in the exact form attached, was p Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X, Daily Globe News , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Notice of Environmental Determination was published on Au ,Lt 18, 1986 F1781 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ .16 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th day of Auj: N ry Public for the State of Washington, ,;- ,� r.:'.' �r . . C--`. residing at Federal Way, t King County, Washington. V VN#87 Revised 10/84 � ��` SAP 11tig86 //I! 3253Z NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND 1HE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: Site Plan Approval - SA-042-86 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a restaurant having approximately 14,174 square feet and for the construction of a convenience store having approximately 1,250 square feet. GENERAL LOCATION: Located on the east side of East Valley Road at the 3600 Block. PUBLIC APPROVALS: Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, inolsw$66.4pr the State of Washington A�i/ ORES C -4. residing in RENT• .0'0*,►SStpN•lF*,Z , on theL/TH day of - _ •. r 198tfo.G k.2,1,.„1_a_.c, _ -�S`I�1 SIGNED: \..J , L4 v1OL ... ..,. . ` '•C..8 19 .•.. .0 ;F wASHW;IIP • 1 3062Z August 19, 1986 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: MLA ARCHITECTS (Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant) APPLICATION NO(s): SA-042-86 LOCATION: Property is located on the east side of the 3600 block of East Valley Road. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a restaurant containing approximately 14,174 square feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Approval with conditions. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 11:15 a.m. on Wednesday, August 13, 1986 in the 3rd floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comments from all divisions of the Public Works Department, both divisions of the Building and Zoning Department, and the Fire, Police, Parks, and Policy Development Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: EXHIBIT Ill Yellow file containing application: proof of posting, publication, and notification of adjacent property owners; along with other documentation pertinent to this request. EXHIBIT Ill Revised Site Plan (received August 11, 1986). EXHIBIT #3 Building Elevation Plans (received June 18, 1986). EXHIBIT #4 August 5,1986 Letter/Modifying application to pay for off-site traffic mitigation. EXHIBIT #5 August 10, 1986 Letter/Modifying application to comply with City Codes and eliminate convenience store. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review. Committee now makes and enters the following: 1. The applicant, MLA Architects, for Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant, has requested site plan approval to allow the construction of a one-story restaurant containing 14,174 square feet to be located on a 1.74 acre parcel. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), a mitigated declaration of non-significance has been issued for the modified subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. 4. All City departments affected have reviewed the original plans. The modified plans received on August 11, 1986 reflect the department's concerns and the Environmental Review Committee's issues. 4 MLA ARCHITECTS SA-042-86 August 19, 1986 Page 2 5. The subject property is located on the east side of the 3600 block of East Valley Road. It is bordered on the north by Shurgard Mini-Storage Warehouses and on the south by Monarch Motor Inn. 6. The property is designated on the Comprehensive Plan as Commercial and is presently zoned B-1, Business Use. Conclusion: 1. The revised proposal of May 16, 1986, of a +14,174 square foot restaurant is appropriate for the subject site. 2. Specific environmental issues raised by the Environmental Review Committee focused on: (1) Access to the subject site. (2) Participation in area-wide traffic improvements. • (3) Use of the site. (4) Storm water drainage. (5) On-site pedestrian circulation. The applicant in letters dated August 5 and 10, 1986 has committed to revising the 1 plans to specifically address the above issues. The Environmental Review Committee subsequently issued a mitigated declaration of non-significance based upon the revisions. 3. To assure that access is provided according to the applicant's intent under his letter of August 10, 1986, the easements should be obtained prior to issuance of the building permit, not prior to issuance of the occupancy permit. 4. The applicant should also be aware the City will force vacation of the building if the applicant does not meet the area-wide mitigation participation as outlined in his letter of August 5, 1986'which stated-that they would participate in the area-wide improvements in an amount of $199,656 ninety (90) days after the issuance of the 1 temporary certificate of occupancy. 5. The on-site landscaping provided does not appear to blend the project with the 1 adjacent industrial user to the north. Landscaping should be increased along with the northern property boundary. 6. On-site pedestrian circulation between the adjacent motel to the south and the proposed restaurant can be accomplished by providing three (3) walkways instead of• five (5) located to align more closely with the three (3) primary access points of the motel. The common access easement between the motel site and the restaurant site would be a logical location for a separate walkway while the central access stairway in the motel located approximately half way along the southern property line would be another reasonable location. Final design should be subject to Building and Zoning Department approval. Decision: The site plan request, file SA-042-86, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Landscaping along the northern property line shall be increased to provide both a vegetational buffer and transition area from the retail commercial restaurant site to the light industrial site. 2. Landscape plans shall be approved subject to the authority of the City of Renton Landscape Architect. 3. Three (3) sidewalks shall be located on the subject site to inter-tie with the motel site to the south. One of the sidewalks can be the public sidewalk along East Valley Road. MLA ARCHITECTS SA-042-86 August 19, 1986 Page 3 4. Participation in area wide traffic improvements as previously agreed upon in Letter from Merrick Lentz dated August 5, 1986. 5. Documentation showing execution of the secondary access easement from Monarch Motor Inn shall be provided to the City prior to issuance of the building permit. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. ORDERED THIS 19th day of August, 1986 Roger J. BlayloclY, Zoning A inistrator For the Site Plan Review Committee TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of August, 1986 to the parties of record: Merrick D. Lentz MLA Architects 233 Eastlake Avenue East, Suite 201 Seattle, Washington 98109 Herman M. Allenbach 25829 152nd Avenue S.E. Kent, Washington 98042 TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of August, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building &Zoning Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record Chronicle REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before 5 p.m. on Tuesday, September 2, 1986. . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available prior to the meeting date of August 13, 1986 may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of 'the decision, which is Tuesday. August 19, 1986. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B)(1), which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on Tuesday, September 2, 1986. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process for site plan approvals include: (1) the Public Works Director, (2) the Building and Zoning Director, (3) the Policy Development Director, (4) the Hearing Examiner, and (5) members of the City Council. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial Committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. �: . 1'lrflaP,A?e. t_firs {-i -- -- ICe:.ti 1.t'.P wW. - -- id,-•'. + '; -:I' sA. .V61Y19 1 0z•• �•i.l.Y:ra a y�6'�,y I 6' S Jo I I ;,$ 4' it l 1 - �' . 4 m=:l r. �rMLL7'unwell _I I 1 .lt."J�.. n rn.Lir a.e _ I,•c� NO I VI ��glitunisw tia o I " qVV` o S,e Gca- • 11 e Ills, .'Tkrl� P ¢ I L___ I r tc.d 1G:c• �N-G� yr G•5� 7,:0'�;_4G_o. e.91' IF3� 'H LMt 0/ Z .,.y .1 i 'PROPOSED RESTAURANT ,� d.dm,. 11Et!!= ♦ --� r4J-. • J I nY n 614•e9.',rp M el 'd b r� �_ ; A J .; p.ry p_, y; 11-14 J C Oy e: J a o = _ P o -.-1. ': i • LEGAL DESCRIPTION COILO .I I ° S b y lI fc Lot 1..Mare Plat ol.-al a'arrl.e w.slim.. c w o F J ""` O ,"' quarter _ o7. J *1 t.T9f,d4, 0 1 �" �NL .•tuwv.... IJIY,KiJ6+. c " I = J _4 Ca' 4 It 1e 1aT wM1' © - $ ° '3 a .100.at on..6 ger.w tea.l:coat. Y 'a V e w " P' 9� ca...ryw•y Z • z, w u ym.e�:.'me.E•tract mV°e:°.ast rip0.:° 0 .r N 1 ,. I I; " C J •a e .: deed S a 3^'" Q I I -�(el¢: - , J P` ,- _ r , :IS' " - ! y ▪ �tee.rr o:i....lee i iE.r of a I F `:u .:'a..:J .: �•a' �-: % P, ,` \C' o i record.▪ i e .•y xo 2.a Q l !�fli GrwA Ie RG I S a �t -Y- o _6' O� m ' County Scper1or Court C..wo..33131 thence aurterr t:a ::l>yai a . ® a.+a.Gr. -ja [� _ ��C�Yl TI Y7 ' .said Section re Nam Ada n e� 1C� Y M:O 5 .1.91'-C S l9'•41 0 I. N..5.r1 feet a.0000Talev.l•.b Fw n iY. filMilliji } 1 „a ore 9 H Z ' & � ,. ; " a.. ..b m ll�le p�.11al.lm br�lla..® O I :PR®aE�a DATA , �GAS ' t. e6$7 ■ ' { i O. • _1 1 fW.I.wE ei1.0• i Proposed DI -.....unmet Q` CPm ® • I 4'move va.c Tx.J,r,(h t' - °eery rp-Restaurant EgS0 L_+. fK.AotYPJM l./sVfi Ch IC)� LI C.1132 ® 'c"' - = 4- INt:Pie Iv.4 61.•1.of r...er•1 b Y 1,,,,,, Occupant Iaae-p..cvuran5r•1.15 Sea. N,.-r ter r.t+91a c.Ad•N. can l y/�Jj�►��IaE_ PLAN E:iep 1 ee fold .r o r .. v-1. V• 141d Y/9•T i'! IrllEf en T.- Yr... •'� I .., �- U a... Y. .avid . •a-Allowable leTT•r. aleee••p.r•.ea• • @� :: 3 "z"�o ro`T, et `"m: t RR" � �--m . • Hong(cj e'.o.mo• • m,T'h root prle l.11,....x r.✓ ✓'n ® .1'T .. r'�n::fv tve"�"-oT'�e ee Halos nwuelm e.T.nt-ul0m..r-r .... o•o rnt ulwua.a flrtcae t-lei Ifry.verve• • 5:P GJi.LI foA hat muTlld:r.WAAL •,o'top°v d.•l r.e • • - . Qi QD dtettle Mr.n.lC4 Pre lure•1416Jti CA. ratite,.-r eeir a.D,..9WS aye:et]..e.l • v.lu.elm_Actual.1 • ;I 15111d • IO' I .I •I-- - �` .e ? .. ^'m�• .. '.S®N^' �6 �. -aT.Mace.eJY.JciI.Y F9eaiwa T.epe.ie.T.•II . - [ I I r r.".radcnn+4.r¢s •rr . • . I • •IM5,a.Gra ..1 sp-an...rm.uanvorµr .E.Jiy rl EJr, 1 _ artl.44.44 3Y9,1 It.Ol.t9 TJtodu.loGt Ve 1 - -fc..M paaacJ t.wae hat rr rt. W n.w v utt 9Z•g b9•Ifts o.Rv9 U 1.D.....1 R• 1 O � J\ _ OS n e V -'V - prior tetroaetreeti'mOa r�r Any el:ar i atoll eDe D 44 l' �. 1..1 Oviform.:1 ae.Cob.and 01 appl.ablaoelte 1 1�_ tp,. I _ of a Macon�.cod.. ° a.r. ,ppra:.;p: In•a::t, F. vi 1. o 1. '°' - 4i . ng Ce..�r.oltnn wwu 1 Iii �� r e 414eccc: .1 u'w Pratt I 0 ?:9 •riYa - altcMa eaed • isti j • o •�l• kNi..� i - *o _ aeyey4".co:r.04 (� '•bT.4 _� 5v`�'•.. e' Camaro `oie� variu s:.. rs, -III- n o 'r5" ' 'l urulatc.•tcA 233 a ainr.Graw .tabs �.Z 1Vr- Ipl :.ps,.i: ?��! it-aiii 24 i.loi C7 t• tidy. CLt�°L�yy ,� s:; ', . 'fit.' d.e ENERGY ANALYSIS z • via �60: 9..m.��a. Cole Copcm•t lore a .I r.,t.c 41 CD co I �._ e.a.r.-ulae l�t Tw -IT w•h9. P Q .tww Leo.-IT.1 ..r...I IW l: eba for� . 0eeterastlonl • I I 4. Tn.ar.ta_a'r.:�lm neeear el:aaal otesa aal Batt.a O :Lo 4 f/ :a a1 of"""'' a r tall rm.Ltlm-e-U Ya[. o Z •9 _Wall o-1m Graea_a-11 wel or d•11.1.1e. W r[n.vl'tim-.-11 b�a�e-11.1.�. 1 +' O=0Z02101 fa Q0I0E0E0 Louc,00xo O O 000�OjSELO41. _;,¢,O,;0, -Glaring- •IKe.•t^ 0042071.75. Ol m [ RfdfTToo•4ltl { I SHEET INDEXtun0cn.J 1aWM3r, wII • Il Te _ - - _ •4' 0 JpArICY9 GTY.WfIG ° r11J6t rrs4 `.1JAlH' :14•Ra:tr Wacape Ilan ash rblwt be. lv, Mdtt .YM (1'u+.KC) r149 fWa (9') u '� lu Ca.8-19••6 µ.1A1buAr1.7A ur 71 NM..Cet0.919M11 �"Woof r and Plea�• 9f.1Y9169 Yauf Tq,C %.TM6444411 0 L'1.i.o•.1K.J whtW(C.') 44 1 uam.ovmlea,mull. p silt N{erl(r11 N9 W.e11M RAp9/Irb((1-w') a�rr.a f t.IraN1.Ma.t•.Jel' u...1, - a1.o.,and !la ^�• a fgLTaelyulli.yp-typ9 W.11..1y 0.WMcyTCJdN YW WIA' O FJapoKYT.b.r•aCTIT(•�.') u elm I.loot Cana m 0041410510(4'.WU) YGw16 LL.a...000 (O'-n•) ei 1.EfeK and am oau11. ///i neOa:r1-4 T..pruau•(v.1q'rr_) rsr:w;rsnul.:p% .4+••rwmw - re n+x.r! CS eT u•:sore 000.wrile - q>.vrx.Jra 0 r=:._ti:v::5 l;,+c) I'ai mx n�::i ca r:s r rr�,..,.a r•-. i c: a I • 11111. ..._ 1 . I kr s..9 _.- ----_,•„____. r....4.4 slul :• _6:_: 1 _'--, 1'. _".1' 1__-. •1 71.,N..=..1N.T- 1.-r -1'•'' 1.1 1 F---- ... I -.7-7 4L-ET_.-•._M7.n_--1 11111so i -=4 - -4ia 1 f _- _ _._L-,."I ,Hiii, L-!I,-.-i_-,11L.!:_._.., ..s....:,. 1. 1 1 _, 2L sae 0 'AD 4 . • • WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION T.1 06 i 121611 %IT*.(cal 'IP,:R..676 [LW,ea. 2 2 A gag - •`-‘ •-,-:-. - '- -'.....,-1, L . . :. ... _ . • ',.. 'i .0 lap•.rit; . ',, ... IMMO ':...:''. e.. Ufa * .' -: '-:' --- -- • • 6211:111 er•mp' Pro ems _ -- -.- -_-, _--— .. ,1 . g'rg,"1",All. i:I• .• I 1 . II __ _ ___I !• i, E ' ES '' :2Eg I I:, . - - g _-_- 20 fi.6.•Levu -.:---- --.-------- A ------'—' -- --- • TIM 0 , 1------=---T •- Rpm 0-t-i. os11, ,; ill:. ,,, , .i.,Ii;1,• I, -,- , ' li, :-=-- i 1 11 ------_._ 7__-27--e"-ITY atir4u44.4T . C464 44 vssITT: - ..,.' ! ' i-- :' l' ;i 111 ---- ---- ---- ---L Tttistti''T H G ; ____c-L,-_-_-_"_7,! ,, , -- - -- _. , .1 --, : 1 _ ___._.._:—i' ....".7.."-7- r ',!,,, ,_44,1_,,LE.,_,,,,h....L,_,..,_•_, ,,... , , 1 r 11.70 I . . • .. . SOUTH ELEVATION 'EAST ELEVATION i. -m . . .4 1.• F?" 1311 a .046+,St t. Cfrir i;-....;7•00" , 0 16.064,16-4. 0 M "z g eliMPII _ --1 4 r,, 0 r...eesv. 111111 111111 R611,01,-0. 2 co z i fR efFiz., FA cc ,,, r•••Lc. &Ie..- clEIL X• 0 tn D < 11F .1 ---.111 . ...- ..j--- i ' '- ,., _Lh '' 6-4 ._rt (-41.0 3 .cc-c....v 0 .' - ri-o•ILATT_C.6111 .....111111/.-T FI.T6411J6 6 1 7,71,67614 a Fa4w.1 TrT426.1 ff.1,TP611.pl. 2 I 4.10. 1 Cl. 1 al=1. 1.±.!e I 0 i g pg616 4 4 I,.f7s ,.i - da-AA 0' 0 ujZ. -'''' .,' IM J. ww.....v.., .01 CC• ." ---."•••°,1-1---C „,© . 1"0' /131k •Zr! 7 ' C3313=1 SECTION A•A •SECTION 0-11 =MM. I=111.11 11:: 1„ .. . 9 1 71? "•'.c 9 .. . .. o � w architects --- • I August 5 , 1986 Mr. Roger Blalock Zoning Administrator Building and Zoning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT FILE: SA-042-86/ECF-041-86 Dear Mr. Blalock: Per your request in the letter dated July 30 , pertaining to the Environmental Review Committee findings as relates to the Valley Transportation impact assessment applied to the subject restaurant, we hereby notify you of our responce. In order to begin construction at the earliest possible date, we wish to secure a declaration of non-significance with conditions. We understand that the conditions of non-significance include the assessment of an impact fee that is determined by the assignment of vehicle trip counts as they apply to this use. We will be eliminating the convenience store from this proposal, which will establish the total assessment charge for this project as 1062 vehicle, trips times the per-trip charge of $188, or a total charge of $1'99 ,656 . We propose to submit a bond in this amount at the time that the permit is issued. Because of the large amount of the fee, we ask that the collection of the bond be established as 90 days after the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, in order to allow the restaurant to generate the funds with which to pay the fee. One possible way to guarantee collection by the city would be to issue a temporary C of 0 that would expire 90 days after issuance, and convertable to permanent status only with the satisfaction of the payment requirement. The payment up front of the entire amount would impose a hardship on the restaurant company, and while 90 days will not solve the problem, it would at least give the store some means of generating the cash. Time is of the essence, so we urge the ERC to review and approve to this project at the earliest possible time. If you have any F further questions , please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. SnIYO Sincerely, .'�gl i profr ! ' rgton '` � . SUll.OlN(3,ZGO6NI iG DE,'PT Merrick D. Lentz AIA BUILp�N0/ZONING DEPT, CITY RENTON SITE PLAN REM : ' EXHIBIT N®® ITS;.. H®a SA- o 42-8G MAarchitects August 10 , 1986 CITY OF RENTON Mr . Roger Blalock E Cgs V FE---\\. Building and Zoning Department Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. i So. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BUI«M / ZONING DEPT. FILE : SA-042-86/ECF-041-86 Dear Roger : Per our discussion on August 8 , we are submitting 4 copies of the revised site plan for your review and approval. Please note the following changes that are incorporated into this plan: -the convenience store has been eliminated. -the driveway aisle widths have been increased to 24 ' on three sides of the building. The following items are not indicated on, this site plan, but are being addressed as part of the response to the plan correction notice. These changes are being made to. comply with all City standards, and when completed and approved will comply with all requirements. They include : -the recorded easement for the second means of access across the Monarch Motel. property. This document is currently being prepared and will be submitted to the City at the time of permit issuance. -the drainage plan as related to the offsite water from the state R.O.W. property is being restudied and ammended, and will be resubmitted with other plan corrections during the week of Aug. 11 . Roger, time is of the essence now in the completion of this project approval. We intend to comply with all items on the correction notice, and would appreciate any assistance in securing the immediate approval of the site plan review process. Since all items still to be resolved are listed on our plan correction sheet, they .;•:E will have to be resolved to the satisfaction of the various departments before the permit can be issued. We therefore would appreciate approval of the site plan at the next meeting. ^,r gton CITY OF -NTO. . 59TE PLAN REv8Et: TTE . NC.L___5.zLg_tz_::gbz,...uvtqsvmssysoc / / �. Mr. Roger Blalock -2- August 10, 1986 The schedule of the remaining reviews and approvals would make permit approval possible on Sept. 2 at the very earliest. We want to keep the process moving at the quickest possible pace, and wish to secure approval as close to that date as possible. If I can be of any assistance in keeping this project moving, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance during this project review. Sincerely, Cmc - Merrick D. Lentz AIA MDL/ml I crnr off' REIt4T 7E0 1 ii11.4 , I.i:. 1 BO LD1NG / ZOOOcuG DEPT. • r 1 i 1 1 2035N CITY OF RENTON . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-041-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-042-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a restaurant approximately 14,174 square feet. PROPONENT: MLA Architects (Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the east side of the 3600 block of East Valley Road. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this amended proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCM 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including: 1. Revised site plan received August 11, 1986 2. Letter from Merrick D. Lenty (dated August 5, 1986) 3. Letter from Merrick D. Lenty (dated August 10, 1986) on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than September 1, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: August 13, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: August 18, 1986 / 1 ta R nald G. Nelson Orr I ri •.:r Building and Zoning Director Policy Devel•• ent Dir tor Richard C. ghton Public Works Director 2035N CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-041-86 AI1PLICATION NO(s).: SA-042-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a restaurant approximately 14,174 square feet. PROPONENT: MLA Architects (Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located on the east side of the 3600 block of East Valley Road. L IAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this amended proposal has determined that it does not have a pribable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including: 1. Revised site plan received August 11, 1986 2. Letter from Merrick D. Lenty (dated August 5, 1986) 3. Letter from Merrick D. Lenty (dated August 10, 1986) on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than September 1, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. fi DATE OF DECISION: August 13, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: August 18, 1986 R paid G. Nelson L rig r Building and Zoning Director Policy Devel ent Dir tor 141-14--'114Ridhard C. ton Public Works Director j I }� 61vIROUMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Slits i ( uP )� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ff:10 L.d I C.1l DATE CIRCULATED: (i g (n COMMENTS DUE: $ — / 3-R6 ECF - O`// - S �o APPLICATION NO(s). S Q - Q 4/01-43 4 PROPONENT: PROJECT TITLE: 0 IQ DOuG+4 r co) BRIF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: R&n3D PLAj LOCATION: SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) I Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS:. . RECOMMENDATION: DNS E J MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: /Y)vnse,„ TITLE: A'SiliktiPan 1�� DATE 'Q/ 3l g,6 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW §1. ;� �' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PICE Z C/; DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: 3 ' 1986 ECF - 041 - SisArlf 440 APPLIiCATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 A, ? - PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS a�A� PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF] DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FAS. \LALLFY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE !AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) , Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) ; Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) , Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 6 sE f,4,47)1•/9 /V a .S'CO-.(E Alo 0 Cd'aryl ErvTA%e, SEE 7 4L E A7T, C.�i Ea E.P. C'_ a/c/Et-/r.C/s i ' '' ��E Eli. COry1mEA'D4 i AO ic'. RECOMMENDATION: El DNS ITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: i6 4 TITLE: , . DATE: ,,e._7 L„e, /9flL FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 _ . _ _ 'I - ...,.IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH11. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: l( E_: R.1 ELF\ C�ty DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: rT JUNE 19, 1986 Ii ECF - 041 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT PUN 2.- ® s3W6,' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPR8.VAL TO ALLW , HE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY J.4,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VA! LEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation // 15) Public Services v 16) Utilities COMMENTS: .e-102,6r-e4gwey, /recess O,./1 ?,esp¢,oSE® .46c/i/'/h7 /S /VoT "'deg-gem.7-4), ,Qc�E9e®A/e "6-Es' -5',r f��A�t0: /"!�//�»c� / LU/D 7 7 0 E ACc' c c /S 020 . f-4e g _ ,0 i. /2 6 9 co/i ES/ 7T1JC A xl9 p r4- IQ C c ES ' /o , 7 '/.��i.vl. a., i�.� �s-iiw/.P., c.,m l'Uio ifs cl ' �0 ,. BQ//.c®/,c4 C.6Es 779ei,ees,w: AS 2 e-9 elf / o e g s/c /"Ar A--4E .9.x q1- F. C, alsv® C/e y ./,�.0" d�mi,c;.#09ty ee".5 /2E c//,e�� io se coes,, / f,e-D ex/ /77-i /Cd/ A19"7- /c' �E /sVS%d9d.l.Ep /;/ /7,0 e-mcD c//?%- No""43E /9 S 2)/c7-19 7 7") Q/V /2sE /C/o ex.) /2� 4/,e/0- 1,1 e-N %.S, RECOMMENDATION: _ DNS aMITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: //A /// 4o,„e_evdsc ' TITLE: , 7 :- "0)-9g,!S .4 DATE: --./cfsveg" // /9 g e. FORM (/14 REVISED 9/10/85 r/// SoPf' IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW.SF REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6 14J6 DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: ECF - 041 86 4)01/09e t APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14.174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth L/ 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants LV 5) Animals ✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources f 7) Environmental Health LV 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing LV 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare (` tV 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation v' 14) Transportation 15) Public Services / 16) Utilities COMMENTS: V` c__ (2--c--- L--;:g,14„:„.„0„...(r,___,, ,L„,,,,_4,_..,, 6/ i/ Appl«,(-- sc 4-/1Pr Af G-t-calf-„ ,— ri-L9 RECOMMENDATION: El DNS Q MITIGATED DNS EIS l � REVIEWED BY: .6______ �--mot 44e-`' TITLE: \�DATE: 7 /7/ce FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 Pr (RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: /l 6, 11UCERING DI V p DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1 ,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BL CK, SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics L✓ 11) Light and Glare ✓ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation ✓ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: // 4 RECOMMENDATION: DNS Eli MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: e/ F FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 I / - a u c r I [RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHIj REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: v T 1 LA "'-' DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: 161986 ECF - 041 - 86 3UL..'V To- APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14.174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BIOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): . 15,424 SQUARE FEET. . IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) ., Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: LoT 3 2 0/4- 8/ W 'SAL SUBJECT TO UR URREEMENT-WATER NO 1 LATE COMERS 1$REEMENT-SEWER yES 7 ' 41,F'7 3 i 1/f SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE..WATER y&S $3,O4/. 312R 5 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CILZ:S±:-SEVER yeES Xs, 0¢/ „ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT A i'_ %-E'J!TER /J SPE. R ASSESSMT I - ,r:...,. la7p;nui WATER FL'. Y' S, 4614EA. /WAXeD 0.e°6'a.stCd.E SEWER I�I.t. NO /F /y,ET,ee c N,V.MAA.e. ,4 ppG/C477i N 41GIST AP:MEC FIRE HYBRh. BE-Am 7D MAD RY FIRE C;'" Y' sir, TD CDN/V 2�'��ET 7-4IIC °�'::l,YS` w A/4-M, Nil /3y 2).EV,1 ,sgP ,19' RECOMMENDATION: Y DNS Er/I'AITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: iikL y oE-/ii-//I/4.6- DATE: 7/ 21,-- ki FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 _ IRO ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sv Pe REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F F IC.. DATE CIRCULATED: 5; -- / a - ' eo COMMENTS DUE: '$ — / S-�s ' ECF - Q`// - $ 6, APPLICATION NO(s). Q - Q Q - 3 4 PROPONENT: PROJECT TITLE: o (.' e. .QQUe+1 nil 0 I J a co-) BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: UiSED c1TE PLAki LOCATION: SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals G 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: -� fir' - a° e__, �.a C.+G ` -; R d e,, 'f®�5��? ( . im1) ! ! , RECOMMENDATION: El DNS MITIGATED DNS 11 EIS REVIEWED BY: :A:7 S''' Z'X1-1 TITLE: DATE: 8/ 2143 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 "- - b SOPe I [RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ""re-A-- PP/C DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 J V APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants • 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics - 11) Light and Glare 4/ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: p I .) is a) 1 C LI\k.l Ir ' 9 �� I a L. 1-kV2,-, jltD P--41-s L-.6-5c;` r t`1_ U-E) .f �... . V a E ��d . kI 4.1 Li' o", 6 1. 4 ! e P P 'fir Fr y 1 % f��r-'".. 2"_ 0.��c `j C3 c'-? ..vl "y: � a cci 6z � Y c� -�0in, t�lzuF p Urtiri -x �,� A «y7Vx 7 9 ia�z, /b o0 (1'61/1-Ve4 / hc c 42- 5D 32z,� = 463 ki;' NL a, try e l— X /0 00 /5/, /' #0,1)-s oO� 1-61A L I L v-• P E' S RECOMMENDATION: El DNS MITIGATED DNs [1 EIS REVIEWED BY: l //l' � TITLE: DATE: 4 °? J 1 .15)6FORM #14 .7112c/"kiiall REVISED 9/10/85 °v' t ,- A S�J e S Wy e 1•-4 ,, 'b1i C L--1-L°/• ca D t,5 ` • — •-- Xar (i 4T-v(,4, n (23., --s s ocic---24 . Cçr ) -a 5 c/R--:ch4-e 6,4 a I ---T-74-e.,14 ' cT • I -1 --Fire- 17_ 1-7 ylop kre - (r/ • s +-„kc-T-4-•-cb, 4:7-d p t + 74 s ed,5 cnm e -1-7;117e4.-x a 2 -8 E s Eva-4a cApn_f_ ( ( 2_ _f_ttl,(_ r-(4c-ktiL'-i(1 S"-E a-6V uoi fog E ,634 -=_-. D e fv-r) otA/y ifra '0,-->c f , -1 , r < sp-ra,0 -7 It Caa e 7/0-is/ - ezz " d, z--vD1 12V J • I d s hi l' Lo '11; di-ft 14 6 = )--t icyL GAi ski a -1- . C7 &.P-ecg5- c2 y SSIV D4. 1 • IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SF REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: r ) rF 1 G ?fLx77 f DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ( / 10) Aesthetics c-// 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation -5/ 1v;P „V' 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ; s r � pr,„,rzP-K4)/ems -7".ep fie, /LI 7L- Sedi6Le L-C) VO/ a �, ►�a � red . ,Lq 4_0✓a ��'✓L,�'v� C�n,11 '-' ,.5 8 6��=I e�'G a' ' 7 ' it i�c "Y"',C, `''_ /r) 7IQ 9 end e S i �-e , 5 S 55 14-r r�e5 f 'a \r Vi PS CofIULt �e11,G e Plav RECOMMENDATION: El DNS 1 MITIGATED DNS_p == n EIS REVIEWED BY: ,14i ,,-, \" TITLE: DATE: / ? ,R,6 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 I / ti RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF _ 041 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT : MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CUN- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO : ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 ENGINEERING DIVISION i TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : n UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU [I] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Eli BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ri POLICE DEPARTMENT ri POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 11OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : --nwaF62, c,3 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED /, D4• 1,:k E) I I e v -, I z Ge f© l am- U G l > � r ��L•1"C D.� Caw-6 a�" E , U'&11 ) Sw s 5 V Z o v e—P,p 2/ S Le lac,_04 pr a 1-4- 1 L I fl C t-t U al l. lr d 4-c_S f r '}-'i i1 j c3-ti--" .1r"'"--6-Gi� e S� 2 ,�"�d a-' 5 S -S t � 4I.K 2 ; -f R� �oi/i � feas4- >ybo , / S COtiu ,L,Lie,",Le_ Mavtg4- Cr a7o X /g -4? DATE: AssessyrieCt+ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR 0 ""THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,q� .� 4 REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ;RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 3 UIILS - ~, -bE` ` DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 ' COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14.174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth I 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: NKDNIS O MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: 4;e 5A'G TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ' Oft RENTG" BUILDING & ZONING DERAr RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 041 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR IHE CON- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO : ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ( L� APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED B 5 ii747 tUo (J0 DATE : -e%?09, SIGNATURE 0 RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pfl L(C,\-1 Of L_C;P c)'"1 ,S V DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 CI 1 �' LF RENTON ECF - 041 - 86 . APPLICATION NO(s), SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 J U N 1 i1 1986 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS Pouc'r tip-vFL_OpmPNT ncF- PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW? THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BIOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water v/ 4) Plants 5) Animals _ l/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health - 8) Land and Shoreline Use l/ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) TransportationZ/4r; 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ,LA-49—c-dc,4w.2,0 tiGe/as4-r,/4311 cte.LI,L„_ /t4C, ' ( /o�orf.a7' RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: 64t, InnvvtscrY, TITLE: 7f/ 4•, �2 P^ V �' I �SfS l DATE: 07/F?‘ FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT, �h� BUILDING & ZONING DEN" ;'MIIENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 041 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: • SA-042-86 PROPONENT : MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION LII FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT .POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LIII OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : filt /c ( DP/FLOPine-/VI' Ei APPROVED aOVED WITH CONDITIONS � NOT APPROVED w £ szy- / 7.) Ytiv &A-4-e L5A - /04te L-4 „,62/gt DATE: OOK SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • no • IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PPRK TEST ° DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: lareCt LU 11-e aUr ( 1)6 RECOMMENDATION: DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS (l EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 • r RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA- MENT f DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 041 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT : 'MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ri UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Li BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Li POLICE DEPARTMENT 111 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS' REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : n APPROVED \piAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 111 NOT APPROVED abf.4C4il)fitVaSlt )9 � 7-(1 --tretv cirnd2 -504' t2),/lckic 046e01(i iLx) ika 4 a Ll tUW SIGNATUR OF DTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SF f REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I 1 U TI i. `� • DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities V COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS a MITIGATED DNS fl EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: (///.LIT)/ Z/Yit/,E-4—/E' DATE: 6 /3/ezi FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 • * • RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEPA 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET , ECF 041 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT : MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO: Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 Li ENGINEERING DIVISION r1TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1986 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (/7/L/ry 0C/4//I/pEXe/Aid- n APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Fl NOT APPROVED NC•FS ARmo ,ihttdL AAA' urn NNE,inSUBJECT TO 1 dL DT S�'-Q/q- �/ LATIrCINUIS MREEMENT-WYAi m A/0 , LATE MEW AIREEMENT-.sg-rlo yts 4,0 hU.zr o.-41 ,AAI mGo_.4.1 SYSTEM IEWXIPMENT CHARGE-MIL 3t0.GL¢/ pn-A- 74,033.4# _ ? / SYSTEM IEVULPMENT CHARGE-SEWER �s �� _,fis4 $ ACV •• A' " 3, '' /. - 3Z SPECIAL UMW AREA CHARGE-WATER 0 y�'Z, 032. eo¢ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER NO APPROVED WATER PUN V,Fs <03 i APPROVED SEWER PUN Y ' APPROVED FIRE NTORANT LOCATIONS WINE DEPT. _ y, S �� FIRE FLT�'J ANALYSIS Ask - • a D 'Ai _ T . Wri. 3 / DATE , r /2ro SIGNATURE OF ORECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ' Form 182 - • 'IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SF ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT A 4R,E\1 E-L \ UnK) DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: -"'JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s), SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS = - PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT [.ii.N O :ii,c6; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPRIGVAL TO ALL , 1 ,JHE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation !� / 15) Public Services v 16) Utilities COMMENTS: �h7E�Fgiv /a-e -gss' goo uadso ?,�(370vsEo .Qc/i%1/gip /S A 07 Es e i 7.77 /q�L €"9TE "see �Aox/. ' "v,' r)et sr) w/D 7-11 0 E `7cc'Ess is ,02 c or ;es' Fief �e?"7 /069 ciIies iv)EAiv$' O 4ccEss r//dK C'.e.5'TAu0-Ajt17 ) /S 2 E9 e'/,e / o B,g syoeiyvfr.MEME/ '49" c1 Fe, c ,;AV,/�Es 20-9 U/xf� o �J E C 0 I) /0 /i E O Lc/ %%✓ /4(fi "A N7 id /3 E /.VS 27#; l.cc" o E Q v.g i ic/(i r»<3 Eie As c719:.Eo ,Q y ,c/,e,E e•n, 73_ RECOMMENDATION: El DNS d MITIGATED DNS Ei EIS REVIEWED BY: 4.«A A oir/ TITLE: A"-"e " DATE: -.it/A.)4e" //, /5' F e. FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 . RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET .041 86 ECF _ . APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: • SA-042-86 PROPONENT : MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Ei UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION g FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT flBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON JUNE 19, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : , Pt.-etientôt-i EIAPPROVED 11—jAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 21(OT APPROVED d P rte,- icft y out 0/oeP-s ma t Meet Q b e pi d CGe S' /eel u f'r-e Ak e'.4 r S - ( ue, m d d / nee / / ,:,7 4 e 4 fri. i._ -tex k (./e#K)it Ake s k I 4 d ei Ilvtai'"?.. — / 1/ ��- DATE : s /, 'd SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR % ' REPRESE/yATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Fr„-n, 1 R 7 st ; 0. 1 !_, _):RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C 1 .l C EO IDEPT - DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14.174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants . 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services ��O 16) Utilities N COMMENTS: si.3i,tAAc_aLL) t Kroza--: z/a6/Y7 RECOMMENDATION: DNS El MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED B . G2 TITLE: L� , DATE: e'1-4:-Mt< FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENTC-- BUILDING & ZONING DEPAr-7AENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF _ 041 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT : MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 11 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 111 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 7 /1, ?3 DATE:: .� ��. _. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 S Pe IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PD C.I CAE; DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: ANC 191'1986 ECF - 041 - 86 tpAl APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14.174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: ' DNS MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: t&reO az �,� TITLE: C�� /CGGGZ //yJ DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 . S IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tj*) 61 110 EER\(U G, DI V' DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86. APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BJOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth c/ 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants c/ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources • ✓ 7) Environmental Health L/ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation ✓ 15) Public Services ✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: :Pe45,(44-57)--ratiaA__ fri RECOMMENDATION: DNS ZJ MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: .7/%. 6 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENTI BUILDING & ZONING DEP& MENT - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 041 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: • SA-042-86 PROPONENT : MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE GUN- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 ‘/ZIENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU [1] PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT r-] POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -' Ei APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WIT CONDITIONS NI NOT APPROVED r . . '�/Z/ ce DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14.174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 360( BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: El DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI. WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 041 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT : MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE : SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CON- STRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1.250 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. TO: ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 6/25/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON JUNE 19, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED [1] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 . i ,,Ar J q 01 b'bL. L:1 • 1 so- )---A terci R 1 - � 47 '0) 1 g L•1 1 92 b b� — 11/4'ci 0 o•o l ' 9b'S 14' d L --- 000 (001 irf , 00g) . l - , e '°,� L,vi1RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHL_. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i1p") Y "FP I C. F., ; DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 10, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JUNE 19, 1986 ECF - 041 - 86 ' APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 PROPONENT: MLA ARCHITECTS PROJECT TITLE: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAYING APPROXIMATELY 1,25.0 SQUARE FEET, LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 360(1 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 1.74 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 15,424 SQUARE FEET. • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE • IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air �� 3) Water I- 4) Plants - 5) Animals v 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓- 7) Environmental Health 1----" 8) Land and Shoreline Use 6.---- 9) Housing ( / 10) Aesthetics `-/ 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation L.---"' 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation /.----- 14) Transportation L-�r, %;��'�- .,-�{Ii;VV) , 15) Public Services 16) Utilities I . COMMENTS: 1_.-,.,,,'r.L ,�, S lti.,�,z[ --> 3`r±, L i 'j ��.t / ,H ±� / ?( '; l - c='-fir_ �L--t_ f�''�OI/�Y' �y-<=P 1ca.�,w_1_.�_� _ e,_(- `J� ,_`� i )--.._�_,i'I y'�_,' `? 1 1, it_t� 1 J ,-, ..I •C:%` "?. -'7:_, 11/ l j.,`.... l rl�>�, . ',i -� _. .._J • j ' .. ' . (/ li. 1,! �.J .. ,/ (� 7 l''=. cl U Y)(Al •f v I p hi -i- Co,,l V, c I,j EJ -)/)-,1 11(.51- - -- a y ri r c nc'.:i j `s' a -7 D 1' ,/ '-/rr' �_ ti % 7 o)Q�(-) - • • / "4', . . /., RECOMMENDATION: DNS Oiri MITIGATED DNS n EIS i/;;E, ,�, 5� `-;"a-fee-7-2 -4---1 'REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: '�� /7 /l FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 .. LA architects June 24 , 1986 Mr.Jerry Lind Planning Dept. City of Renton Renton, WA. Subject: Responce to Environmental Checklist Comments , Sourdough Mining Company . Restaurant Project Dear Jerry: Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond to the Environmental Checklist comments from various City Departments . It is our desire to work with the City to resolve any and all issues that will help to expedite the' review process . We offer the following information to assist the decision-making process of the E.R.C. 1 . Police• Department Comment: -The proposed convenience store will be open 16 hours per day, from 7 A.M. until 11 P.M. A robbery alarm system, therefore, will be studied, but not necessarily inplemented as of the time of this responce. 2 . Utility Department Comments: -When final fire flow figures are available, the water supply system will be modified as required to provide adequate flow. If a loop is needed, this will be provided. The sewer and water hook-up fees. are noted and will be paid at the appropiate time. -It is our intention to hook up the buildings to the existing Metro sewer line at the east end of the property, thereby eliminating the need for a City-approved manhole. 233 '3. Fire Department Comments : Eastlake Avenue East -See the utilities section above for the responce Suite to the need for a looped water main. 201 -In order to provide a second access of 20 ' in Seattle width to the building for emergency vehicles, •an Washington • access easement will be recorded over the Monarch 98109 Hotel property to the south, which will provide 628-2911 access to the southeast corner of the property. (See the attached sketch of the revised Site Plan. ) 1 Mr. Jerry Lind -2- June 24 , 1986 Fire Department Comments (cont. ) -To reduce the dead end length of the driveway at the east end of the building to less than 150 ' , the building will be moved to the north as indicated on teh enclosed sketch. Thus the south drive will increase to 24 ' in width, and the north drive and parallel parking stalls will be eliminated. -The proposed fire hydrant shown at the southwest corner of the building will be moved to the southeast corner adjacent to the driveway access to the monarch property. 4 . Drainage Department Comments : -It has been our intention since we first encountered the drainage question to continue to provide unrestricted water flow from the drainage ditch on the east end of the property to the City line on the west, but only to the extent currently provided. We cannot be held responsible for implementing an improvement effecting the entire regional drainage pattern when the solutions are not possible within the boundaries of our parcel. We have shown a covered system that will accomodate the flow currently controlled within the existing ditch. We would prefer, however, to work with the City to have the State provide the originally intended drainage system north to the existing interceptors that are capable of handling this runoff. There is currently no easement for drainage on the subject property, and the existing ditch was dug within the last few years without the proir knowledge or consent of the property owner. If teh water is allowed to flow north into the drainage system capable of handling the flow, all flooding-related would be solved, and the responsibility of the correction would be born by the proper agency. Iwil Traffic Department Comments : -First, we would ask to have the trip allocation calculations modified to more accurately reflect the proposed uses. The rsetaurant building is CO 14174 . SF, and has included in this area 907 SF for private offices not directly related to the 14174 operation of this restaurant, 673 SF for a Gift •Mr. Jerry Lind -3- June 24 , 1986 Traffic Department Comments (cont. ) Shop and 460 SF for a museum-type display, both of which are for the use and enjoyment of the restaurant guests and will not be a separate attraction. This reduces the actual restaurant footage to 12134 SF, which compute to 909 trips generated; using the multiplier provided by the ITE Manual. In addition, the convenience store will be in operation 16 hours per day, which reduces the factor from 625 trips down to 322- trips. The ammended total for this proposal would then be 403 trips. -We feel that there are some additional mitigating factors that need to be discussed. First, the hours of operation of the restaurant are compatable with the traffic impact concerns of the valley. The unit will not serve breakfast, so there is no conflict with the morning rush hour traffic. -Being open for lunch provides an attractive alternate for local business people to leaving the valley area. This will reduce traffic impact by providing a close destination for the surrounding properties. A survey by another similar concept restaurant in the immediate area indicates that 80% of the lunch trade is form the local valley area. "AzoM -The dinner hour for this use, again supported by another similar use, typically begins after 6P.M. , which is after the peak evening rush. Thus, even though traffic is coming into the valley from the surrounding areas, it is not conflicting with the heavy traffic times. -It would be fair to view this use as a •service to the valley occupants, and one which willreduce the length of trips within the valley, plus help reduce the trips out of the valley area. -Another mitigating factor is the property owner' s recent participation in the amount of $50 ,000 in the recent L.I.D. for improvements to East Valley Road. The owner will be retaining ownership of. this parcel after development, and hence has already contributed to the valley improvements to transportation. For this reason, this parcel should be considered in the same light. as an existing property, and be exempted from the improvement assessment. y y Mr. Jerry Lind -4- June 24 , 1986 Traffic Department Comments (cont. ) -The convenience store was established to service the motel patrons, and to serve the anticipated pedestrian market that will be developing in the near future. Its size is roughly half of a comperable "full service" market such as Seven-11 or Plaid Pantry, and its location is not extremely convenient for mototized traffic. As a separate use, it will not generate a significant volume of traffic. -As property owners and developers, we do not object to the improvements of the valley. However, since these improvements will be to the betterment of the entire valley community, it seems only fair and right that a method of funding be developed that encourages the participation of all property owners , not just the current developers. We would be happy to sign and notarize an Intent to Participate letter for any future L. I.D.-type valley-wide improvement project, or some similar form of agreement acceptible to the City. -We ask that you please review the. projected impact of this project on the valley transportation system, and modify the trip counts to accurately reflect this impact. We are not opposed to the improvements, but we must also be wise stewards of our available funds, and build a project that will support itself for many years to come. A major assessment like the one as suggested, unless modified, makes a project of this limited scope infeasible. -If we are to participate in any way in the valley transportation improvement system, we should not be charged separately for the signalization project at 41st and East Valley Road. A comprehensive improvement plan needs to be developed to cover all anticipated projects , and eliminate as much as possible further separate and isolated projects. If you need any further information, we will be happy to provide this to you. We ask that you please review these comments at the earliest possible time, so that the project can proceed as soon as possible. Thank you for your consideration and assistance. Sincerely, Merrick D. Lentz AIA MDL/ml 2033N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: COMMERCIAL DESIGN ASSOC. (ECF-040-86) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two one story buildings having approximately 11,688 square feet on 1.03 acres, file SA-041-86; property located northeast corner of intersection of Strander Blvd. extension (S.W. 27th Street) and West Valley Road. f-MLA ARCHITECTS (SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT) (ECF-041-86) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a restaurant approximately 14,174 square feet, file SA-042-86; property located on the east side of the 3600 block of East Valley Road. TEXACO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC. (ECF-062-86) Application for conditional use permit to extend existing pump island and canopy 14 feet west and replacing existing dispensers with two 4-product and two 3-product dispensers, file CU-070-86; property located 1408 Bronson Way North. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by September 1, 1986. Published: August 18, 1986 r NOTICE ENVIRONME ' TAL Fj Y,hy DEcL ATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-04I -86 APPLICANT MLA ARCHITECTS(SOURDOUGH MINING CO,RESTAURANT) PROPOSED ACTION SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS EAST SIDE OF THE 3600 BLOCK OF EAST VALLEY ROAD POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. f THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL x WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY SEPTEMBER 1 . 19RA . AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., SEPTEMBER 1; 1986 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. ■, �1► M• architects August 10 , 1986 1 OF LEN d tiN Mr . Roger Blalock �(�';; `-J iti� E. ,- Building and Zoning Department Renton Municipal Building ,, ;:, • 200 Mill Ave. So. t Renton, WA 98055 BUdLD N( / E9 SUBJECT: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT IN DEPT. FILE : SA-042-86/ECF-041-86 Dear Roger : Per our discussion on August 8 , we are submitting 4 copies of the revised site plan for your review and approval. Please note the following changes that are incorporated into this plan: -the convenience store has been eliminated. -the driveway aisle widths have been increased to 24 ' on three sides of the building. The following items are not indicated on this site plan, but are being addressed as part of the response to the plan correction notice . These changes are being made to comply with all City standards , and when completed and approved will comply with all requirements. They include : -the recorded easement for the second means of access across the Monarch Motel property. This document is currently being prepared and will be submitted to the City at the time of permit issuance. -the drainage plan as related to the offsite water from the state R.O.W. property is being restudied and ammended, and will be resubmitted with other plan corrections during the week of Aug. 11 . Roger, time is of the essence now in the completion of this project approval. We .intend to comply with all items on the correction notice, and would appreciate any assistance in securing the immediate approval of the site plan review process . Since all items 233 still to be resolved are listed on our plan correction sheet, they Eastlake will have to be resolved to the satisfaction of the various Avenue East departments before the permit can be issued. We therefore would site appreciate approval of the site plan at the next meeting. 201 Seattle Washington 98109 CITY 11 RENTON 628-2911 SFR PLAN REV6.E\i"l EXHIBIT NO. • Mr . Roger Blalock -2- August 10 , 1986 The schedule of the remaining reviews and approvals would make permit approval possible on Sept. 2 at the very earliest. We want to keep the process moving at the quickest possible pace, and wish to secure approval as close to that date as possible. If I can be of any assistance in keeping this project moving, please let me know. Thank you for your assistance during this project review. Sincerely, Merrick D. Lentz AIA MDL/ml @ - o�y REMIONN R t architects August 5 , 1986 CITY OF RENTON SITE PLAN REVIEW Mr. Roger Blalock Zoning Administrator EXHIBIT Building and Zoning Department ITEM NO. Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT FILE: SA-042-86/ECF-041-86 Dear Mr. Blalock: Per your request in the letter dated July 30 , pertaining to the Environmental Review Committee findings as relates to the Valley Transportation impact assessment applied to the subject restaurant, we hereby notify you of our responce. In order to begin construction at the earliest possible date, we wish to secure a declaration of non-significance with conditions. We understand that the conditions of non-significance include the assessment of an impact fee that is determined by the assignment of vehicle trip counts as they apply to this use. We will be eliminating the convenience store from this proposal, which will establish the total assessment charge for this project as 1062 vehicle trips times the per-trip charge of $188 , or a total charge of $199 ,656 . We propose to submit a bond in this amount at the time that the permit is issued. Because of the large amount of the fee, we ask that the collection of the bond be established as 90 days after the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, in order to allow the restaurant to generate the funds with which to pay the fee. One possible way to guarantee collection by the city would be to issue a temporary C of 0 that would expire 90 days after issuance, and convertable to permanent status only with the satisfaction of the payment requirement. The payment up front of the entire amount would impose a hardship on the restaurant company, and while 90 days will not solve the problem, it would at least give the store some means of generating the cash. 233 Time is of the essence, so we urge the ERC to review and approve Eastlake this project at the earliest possible time. If you have any Avenue East further questions , please let me know as soon as possible. Suite Thank you for your consideration in this matter. s n� 201 ,n T. O r t:f:I'aTON Seattle Sincerely, �', �� ,� �, 1rij1 `6i � 7 —, ) Washington 1'1 4, tt 98109 r .. � + ton . 628-2911 �ll it �+ /+ 19 (6 s NNNiu G 5 19v6 Merrick D. Lentz AIA BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. - r c OF I A. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT NU. RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 • 235-2540 0,94TPD SEPt*-Ish BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 30, 1986 Herrick D. Lentz 233-:Eastlake-Avenue East, Suite 201 Seattle, Washington 98109 SUBJECT: SOURDOUGH MINING COMPANY RESTAURANT FILE: SA-042-86/ECF-041-86 Dear Mr. Lentz: The Environmental Review Committee met on both Wednesday, July 23, 1986, and Thursday, July 24, 1986, to discuss the issue surrounding the Valley Transporation Study as it relates to commercial project's participation in impact fee mitigation:. Specifically, your proposed ± 14,170 square foot restaurant was evaluated by the Committee. They based their decision on the following facts: . • 1. The restaurant generates motor vehicle traffic to support its operation. Customers must travel by automobile to access the site. If•the "restaurant'was part of a mixed use complex then the Committee might has considered a different position. 2. The traffic analysis prepared for the Valley was based upon total traffic volume with a design for a Level of Service E for a two hour p.m. peak. "Therefore the issue of the specific peak use of the restaurant was not considered. 3. During the two hour p.m. peak, the proposed project has substantially the same percentage of total vehicles entering the site as would an office complex. (The traffic study anticipated a 20 percent of total traffic volume peak for office users, while the restaurant anticipated 16 percent of their total users would be during this p.m. peak.) Merrick D. Lentz July 30, 1986 Page 2 4. The City Council has adopted a rate charge of $188 per vehicle trip to be utilized by the Environmental Review Committee as an interim number. This number could increase if certain political decisions are made. It does not appear that it will decrease since it represents the low end of the traffic engineer's assessment. 5. The Committee does agree with your proposal that reducing the store hours of the convenience store would substantially reduce the traffic impacts. Based upon the above change in primary factors, the anticipated participation in area-wide traffic improvements would be reduced from the initial $497,000 to $275,420. This is broken- down for the restaurant with its 1,062 vehicle trips to be $199,656, while the convenience store with its 403 vehicle trips would be assessed $75,764. The Environmental Review Committee wanted to give you the opportunity to respond to their present position prior to issuing a declaration of non-significance with conditions. The option is available to you to agree to the necessity for traffic improvements and the specific amount and actually issue a mitigated declaration of significance. If you wish any clarification or any further information, please contact me directly at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Roger X. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:ss - 2011N ' r OF J • 49 ` t ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ,';"' o . RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR po �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 235-2540 OED SEP�EP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR • July 7. 1986 Merrick D. Lentz 233 Eastlake Avenue East. Suite 201 Seattle, WA 98109 Subject: Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant File: SA-042-86, ECF-041-86 Dear Mr. Lentz: On July 2, 1986. the Renton Environmental Review Committee reviewed your revised plans submitted to the City on June 25. 1986. for the above referenced site plan approval application. The new plan basically looks sastisfactory; but. in order to render an environmental decision, the following items will need to be corrected or resolved: 1. The subject site plan submitted on June 25th will need to be finalized. drawn to scale and dimensioned. 2. A new landscape plan will need to be submitted to reflect the new layout of the site. The Committee is suggesting that a strong accent of landscaping be placed on the most visible areas of the site. this being primarily from East Valley Road and along the common property line with Monarch Motor Inn to the south. 3. A second point of access to the site is required for fire access. The plans illustrate the second route by easement to the south of the property into the Monarch Motor Inn's parking lot. Provide the Committee a copy of the language agreement with the neighboring property. 4. The trip generation assessment fee that will be assessed as participation to the Valley Transportation Improvement Plan is still under consideration, and therefore an assessment has not yet been agreed upon. With the exception of item 4, please submit this requested information at your earliest convenience so that an environmental decision can be made. Upon doing so, the Site Plan Review Committee will also review the plans and render a decision. For the Environmental Review Committee: Jerry Lind Land Use Inspector RJB:JL:1186N:wr t4' Engineers -`K '' Planners CHM HILL Economists Scientists July 5 , 1986 S21040 .A1 Mr. Gary Norris City Traffic Engineer 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Renton Valley Transportation Improvements Program (VTIP) Extra Work Request Dear Mr. Norris : This letter serves as a formal proposal to provide the follow on services for. the VTIP study in two specific areas : 1) Market sensitivity of the impact fee on proposed real estate development in the study area 2 ) Further assessment of the contribution of the commercial land uses to the impact fee. Attachment A summarizes the proposed work scope and estimated costs . The work is considered to be an extension of the pre- viously completed documentation for the Renton Valley Trans- portation Improvements Program. The contractual provisions and compensation would be accomplished under the same basic provisions of the original agreement, and treated as "Extra Work" as outlined therein. We estimate the costs to perform the services at $5 , 750 . We propose to submit technical memorandum( s) to be used as a supplement to the previously completed VTIP study report. We are prepared to commence work upon notification to pro- ceed and anticipate two weeks to complete. Sincerely, Michael . Mariano, P.E. Project anager jm Attachment CH2M HILL Seattle Office 1500-114th Ave.S.E.,Bellevue,Washington 206.453.5000 P.O.Box 91500,Bellevue,Washington 98009-2050 ATTACHMENT A SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 FOR RENTON VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM TASK 1 : MARKET SENSITIVITY OF THE IMPACT FEE For a prototypical commercial, office and warehouse use, assess the market sensitivity of the proposed VTIP trip generation impact fee: Estimated Cost A. ) Develop a residual analysis model $ 400 B. ) Gather and summarize real estate data 800 applicable to study area C. ) Assess normal development costs 800 D. ) Assess lease fees required to support 1, 000 development costs E. ) Prepare technical memorandums 750 $3 , 750 TASK 2 : ASSESS CONTRIBUTION OF COMMERICAL LAND USE TO THE TRIP GENERATION IMPACT FEE FOR NON-PEAK PERIODS 4.A. ) Calculate trip generation without com- $ 400 mercial uses B. ) Assess impact to trip generate fee 1,200 C. ) Prepare Technical Memorandums 400 2 , 000 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR $5 ,750 SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 -3, .i�. . / uses u/ // /14 �� e%.�,�.4.1�1 e-meralco, l—e !xC T Q ibtx r e I"'eec /"� �e Ce-IiLTu4'1 0 our architects June 24 , 1986 Mr.Jerry Lind Planning Dept. City of Renton Renton, WA. Subject: Responce to Environmental Checklist Comments , Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant Project Dear Jerry: Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to respond to the Environmental Checklist comments from various City Departments . It is our desire to work with the City to resolve any and all issues that will help to expedite the review process. We offer the following information to assist the decision-making process of the E.R.C. 1 . Police Department Comment: -The proposed convenience store will be open 16 hours per day, from 7 A.M. until 11 P.M. A robbery alarm system, therefore, will be studied, but not necessarily inplemented as of the time of this responce. 2 . Utility Department Comments: -When final fire flow figures are available, the water supply system will be modified as required to provide adequate flow. If a loop is needed, this will be provided. -The sewer and water hook-up fees are noted and will be paid at the appropiate time. -It is our intention to hook up the buildings to the existing Metro sewer line at the east end of the property, thereby eliminating the need for a City-approved manhole. 233 3 . Fire Department Comments : Eastlake Avenue East -See the utilities section above for the responce IteniMY OF �c ��&�� to the need for a looped water main. -In order to provide a second access of 20 in � E 6; UV' width to the building for emergency vehicles , an access easement will be recorded over the Monarch JUN 2 5 1986 Hotel property to the south, which will provide 628-2911 access to the southeast corner of the property. 5U►LDING/70;1 IN; D;, r (See the attached sketch of the revised Site Plan. ) Mr. Jerry Lind -2- June 24 , 1986 Fire Department Comments (cont. ) -To reduce the dead end length of the driveway at the east end of the building to less than 150 ' , the building will be moved to the north as indicated on tit enclosed sketch. Thus the south drive will increase to 24 ' in width, and the north drive and parallel parking stalls will be eliminated. -The proposed fire hydrant shown at the southwest corner of the building will be moved to the southeast corner adjacent to the driveway access to the Monarch property. 4 . Drainage Department Comments : -It has been our intention since we first encountered the drainage question to continue to provide unrestricted water flow from the drainage ditch on the east end of the property to the City line on the west, but only to the extent currently provided. We cannot be held responsible for implementing an improvement effecting the entire regional drainage pattern when the solutions are not possible within the boundaries of our parcel. We have shown a covered system that will accomodate the flow currently controlled within the existing ditch. We would prefer, however, to work with the City to have the State provide the originally intended drainage system north to the existing interceptors that are capable of handling this runoff. There is currently no easement for drainage on the subject property, and the existing ditch was dug within the last few years without the prcidir knowledge or consent of the property owner. If thk water is allowed to flow north into the drainage system capable of handling the flow, all flooding-related would be solved, and the responsibility of the correction would be born by the proper agency. 5 . Traffic Department Comments : -First, we would ask to have the trip allocation calculations modified to more accurately reflect the proposed uses. The restaurant building is 14174 SF, and has included in this area 907 SF for private offices not directly related to the operation of this restaurant, 673 SF for a Gift 9• Mr. Jerry Lind -3- June 24 , 1986 Traffic Department Comments (cont. ) Shop and 460 SF for a museum-type display, both of which are for the use and enjoyment of the restaurant guests and will not be a separate attraction. This reduces the actual restaurant footage to 12134 SF, which computes to 909 trips generated;. using the multiplier provided by the ITE Manual . In addition, the convenience store will be in operation 16 hours per day, which reduces the factor from 625 trips down to 322 trips. The ammended total for this proposal would then be 403 trips. -We feel that there are some additional mitigating factors that need to be discussed. First, the hours of operation of the restaurant are compatable with the traffic impact concerns of the valley. The unit will not serve breakfast, so there is no conflict with the morning rush hour traffic. -Being open for lunch provides an attractive alternate for local business people to leaving the valley area. This will reduce traffic impact by providing a close destination for the surrounding properties. A survey by another similar concept restaurant in the immediate area indicates that 80% of the lunch trade is m the local valley area. -The dinner hour for this use, again supported by another similar use, typically begins after 6P.M. , which is after the peak evening rush. Thus, even though traffic is coming into the valley from the surrounding areas, it is not conflicting with the heavy traffic times. -It would be fair to view this use as a-service to the valley occupants, and one which willreduce the length of trips within the valley, plus help reduce the trips out of the valley area. -Another mitigating factor is the property owner' s recent participation in the amount of $50 ,000 in the recent L.I.D. for improvements to East Valley Road. The owner will be retaining ownership of. this parcel after development, and hence has already contributed to the valley improvements to transportation. For this reason, this parcel should be considered in the same light as an existing property, and be exempted from the improvement assessment. ' r I Mr. Jerry Lind -4- June 24 , 1986 Traffic Department Comments (cont. ) -The convenience store was established to service the motel patrons , and to serve the anticipated pedestrian market that will be developing in the near future. Its size is roughly half of a comperable "full service" market such as Seven-11 or Plaid Pantry, and its location is not extremely convenient for mototized traffic. As a separate use, it will not generate a significant volume of traffic. -As property owners and developers, we do not object to the improvements of the valley. However, since these improvements will be to the betterment of the entire valley. community, it seems only fair and right that a method of funding be developed that encourages the participation of all property owners , not just the current developers . We would be happy to sign and notarize an Intent to Participate letter for any future L. I.D.-type valley-wide improvement project, or some similar form of agreement acceptible to the City. -We ask that you please review the projected impact of this project on the valley transportation system, and modify the trip counts to accurately reflect this impact. We are not opposed to the improvements, but we must also be wise stewards of our available funds , and build a project that will support itself for many years to come. A major assessment like the one as suggested, unless modified, makes a project of this limited scope infeasible. -If we are to participate in any way in the valley transportation improvement system, we should not be charged separately for the signalization project at 41st and East Valley Road. A comprehensive improvement plan needs to be developed to cover all anticipated projects , and eliminate as much as possible further separate and isolated projects. If you need any further information, we will be happy to provide this to you. We ask that you please review these comments at the earliest possible time, so that the project can proceed as soon as possible. Thank you for your consideration and assistance. Sincerely, c— Merrick D. Lentz AIA MDL/ml 1 ea ...A/ OF RE4, i NI ' ' ' . POSTED: 6/17/86 U 0 Q Z 9,0 0 OF PENDING SITE PLAN AppLic .i. 110N DES C R P T I O N • SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-042-86 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESTAURANT HAVING APPROXIMATELY 14,174 SQUARE FEET AND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE HAVING APPROXIMATELY 1,250 SQUARE FEET. . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST VALLEY ROAD AT THE 3600 BLOCK. PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : 1. ) SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 2. ) BUILDING PERMIT. • PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. *** COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL JULY 1, 1986; 5:00 P.M. *** FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT: APPLICATION NUMBER: The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CITY OP PENTOf R [R-0R- Hw J UN 4 1986 g BUILOIK/2QNINg DEPT. 1 1 ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ASSESSOR'S NAME 'ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ' 1 CERTIFICATION I . by certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their -add esses wer aken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. , ATTEST; Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary for the State of Washington residirt�; at o QJILA on the' 3r�'day, of 1Q'18 0 SIGNED• CERTIFICATION OF MAILING hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of SIGNED: FORM 208 ~ ' RPCI 302305004O8 CAN :00000 %UP : OOOOOOO %/M : -000000 %TATU% :ACTIVE %HURGARD OF RENTON 570783 N 446.71 FT AN MEAN ALG W LN 1 %T INTERSTATE CTR 06/04/86 % LN OF WCH IS PLW N LN OF FOL[� 999 3RD AVE SUITE iOOi BEG 250 FT N ALG N/% C/L FR %EATTLE WA 98104 % 1 /4 COR TH N 89-06-03 E 275 FT LOT :30-23-05 BLOCK: 9iO4 LAST LEGAL M/L TO WLY MGN %T HWY 4.11:5 TH NLY is 8 ALG %D MGN TO N LN OF %W 1 /4 OF RY OY %T %C NC LEVY OM-LV LAND IMPS BILLED PAID P A 87 T 2110 393, 900 1 ,700, 500 .00 .00 86 T 2ii0 393, 900 07001500 23' 646.07 11 , 823.04 H YR FF/ACRE DI%T BENACRE BENEFIT %T BILL %T PAID FF BILL FF PAID RECEIPT DATE 87 i 4.52 1O.17 .0O .00 6468i2O 04286 86 i 4.52 10. 17 54.76 27.38 A%37 MORE LEGAL% P/N ` ` ~ ~_ � ~""'n co � -_- - _ - \~ , " RPCI 3023059 %UP : 000O0O0 00O000 %TATU% � ACTIVE BANYAN INVE%TMENT [�ROUP 569999 LOT 2 CITY OF RENTON %HORT PLAT i0i8 %W i4411-1 06/O4/86 NO 014-8i RECORDIN� NO 8i0520900i %EATTLE WA 98166 %D PLAT DAF — POR %W 1 /4 OF %E 1 /4 — BAAP ON N/% CA... 1D %UBD LOT : 30-23-05 BLOC 9117 LA%T LE�AL WCH I% 25O FT N OF % i /4 COK TH 89—O6—O3 E 275 FT M/L TO WLY RY OY %T %C NC LEVY OM—LV LAND IMP% BILLED PAID P A 87 T 2iiO i4O, 70O .00 .00 86 T 2ii0 140, 700 i ,588.52 .0O F YR FF/ACRE DI%T BENACRE BENEFIT %T BILL %T PAID FF BILL FF PAID RECEIPT DATE 87 i j .62 3.65 .00 .0O 86 1 i .62 3.65 i9.65 .00 A%37 MORE LEA' AL% P/N � c~ - 0 . CD ��~� OF RA,A .001' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT — RONALD G. NELSON DIRECTOR Ca� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 04)4 SEP1" BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR May 29. 1986 Mr. Merrick D. Lentz MLA Architects 233 Eastlake Avenue East, Suite 201 Seattle, Washington 98109 SUBJECT: SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT - FILE SA-042-86/ECF-041-86 Dear Mr. Lentz: The staff of the Building and Zoning Department have done a preliminary review of the above referenced site approval application. In order for us to proceed with any additional City review, it will be necessary for your firm to submit the following items to this office. 1. Submit a revised site plan that meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. This property zoned B-i (Business Use) requires a ten foot landscape setback from the property lines along both East Valley Road and the Valley Freeway (SR-167). Submit seven copies. 2. Provide first class stamps and mailing addresses for all adjacent property owners so we may notify them of the pending site plan approval application. 3. Submit one reduction of each drawing in the form of a PMT or Super K at a size of 8-1/2" x 11" or 8-1/2" x 14". Photographic paper reductions will not be acceptable. Please submit the above requested information at your earliest convenience so that we may proceed with the review process. Sincerely, I LcL Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JFL:ss 2437Z ' },'`', architects . May 27 , 1986 Jerry Lind CITY OF ,ENT r� Fi Building and Zoning Dept. I (In I, 1\ 1 200 Mill Ave. S. 't: Renton, Wa. 98055 -11 MAY 2 81986 .,, RE: Sourdough Mining Co. Restaurant Renton, WA. BuiLD G:7_ON;NG DEPT. Jerry- Per your request, here are the required parking calculations for the new restaurant and convenience store we. are proposing. RESTAURANT- Total sq. ft.= 14 ,174 Lobby, Cashier 986 sq. ft. , Restrooms 625 sq. ft. Display area (1st fl. ) 102 sq. ft. Stairs 2 and 3 250 sq. ft. Mech. , Elect. and, dumbwaiter 95 sq. ft. ' Display area (2nd, f1. ) 411 sq. ft. Corridor (to offices) 165 sq. i:ft. Walls and structure 662 sq. ft. 3296 sq. ft. Net Sq. Ft.= 10 ,878 Parking req. (@ 1/100) = 109 stalls (Note: offices counted at same rate as rest of building. ) CONVENIENCE STORE- Total sq. ft.= 1250 Walls ' 117 sq. ft. Net Sq. Ft.= 1133 Parking req. (@ 1/200) = 6 stalls TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED = 115 ti If you have any further questions , feel free to give me a call. 33 3stlake 'I LI venue ;}r '° 35tA0411,tieL ,,, )1 Tom Lauderback, sy tattle ,. 'ashington 3109 .t a8-2911 +` .4rcY. o _ [TY OF RENTO FILE NO(S): �A=G�; - U BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1' '�� J , 6oz, NIru � /- ) - NrVO MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES MLA AnchLtecto ADDRESS rC REZONE*(FROM TO' ) 233 Ec a(2e Ave. E. Suite 201 • u SPECIAL PERMIT* C] TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY Seatt e, Gla,h)ngton' ZIP98109 Q CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* a] SITE PLAN APPROVAL )O8`ri ., TELEPHONE Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 62 8-2 911 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: NAME 1 * Justification Required Metvt tcfz D. Lentz 4 ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: Same as above ED SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT ED PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT . . C7 WAIVER y-y,_ (Justification Required) Li gK .0 A NO. OF LOTS: le::_J•n:att,:.:�_i.1,4 I PLAT NAME: 1RE21 E Herman M. A.2P-enbach ' "-' "" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Z829- 152nd Ave. S.E. • Q PRELIMINARY i=iTY ...._.�..�_...;• � ' � FINAL Kent, Gla�shtington d 98042 P.U.D. NAME: TEGEI�TOtdr L43-4757 Residential Q Industrial --��--z - .�,;_: v_�- a Commercial a Mixed LOCATION _: «,,;�,_ MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS E. Va.€2ey HighwayED D TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY vacant 13-1 I=1 FINAL _ D�s PROPO) e E PARK NAME: ;� USE S Convenience Stone _. NUMBER OF SPACES: • t54 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COWA TTEE .-2-� SQ. FT. • ACRES ' uans AREA: 76,000 E-7--4 /-74 1\G ' TOTAL FEES L .� ern ,cc;t,; in,,, E^3N STAFF USE -ONLY - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING 9 6 r 5 ' DAT� u�`f P� o �K� APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: �� 1 _ s. 0 ll `� LJ�i✓t Lir., ..,5 Jr APP? PION DETERMINED TO BE: rl, I ® 1 6 Accepted D Incomplete Notification Sent On By: I "JILDING/Zo��ING DEP . (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 6''4- L APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 0 c: 11 1tN' • Gl/f l 0-- El Accepted _ C J�p Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) I ROUTED TO: ��( Building pa j Design Eng. Fire I XI Parks CEi Police �J Policy Dev. EZ5 Traffic Eng. l Utilities REVISED 1-31-Rd I • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). _ That ponti.on 0,6 the Southwest quanten o{y the. South east quanten of Section 30, Township 23 Notrth, Range. 5 East, iQ.M. , in King County, Washington, desetr,%bed cus .4o tows: BP.gLith„g a ' a. pni i nv� J Nnt� , �J �nn�I71'P�l oh Pijig rs ,emir! 4o�2-lr,N fAhd h .ice 250 (eet Notrth oA the South puanten Conners thetwi(; thence Nottth 89o06' 03" East atong the Natrth tine a4 a tract conveyed to Ivan G. Unbedacht and Phyttis, his wiAe, by deed aiy 275 fleet, mane on £eAs4, to the GJestetty tine o1 Pi.%mcucy State Highway No . 5, as condemned in Kdna County Supe Lon Count Cause No. 582233; thence Nonthenty along said WesteAty J .ne to the Nnm'i Pine of Said Southwest quarters; thence (Ueztetr.2y atvny said Nanth tine to surd Section eewteh. tine; thence Southenty to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that po/ tLon within 92nd Avenue Scut .k XQ.EPT 2'h Uaath 44( 71 4op1 nb met ul he Wat AFFIDAVIT I, _ nr-lci.v V\A. 4-k\ tz c .Cr\. , being• duly sworn, declare that I am 0 authorized representative to act for the property owner,(owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge . and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS . . q `I'" DAY . OF N\CL \ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHING1CN, RESIDING AT 4100):0&:— ,, Nam of Notzj y Public) / (Sigt -turee Ow , (Address) (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 • s' SOURDOUGH MINING CO. RESTAURANT Scope of Work This proposal will cover the development of a currently vacant piece of land into an operating restaurant along with a small convenience store. The scope of work involves site grading,. installation of a sub-surface drainage and retention system, tightlining of a existing open channel drainage ditch, construc- tion of a 14°,000 square foot restaurant and a 1250 square foot convenience store, and. the site improvements normally associated with this scale of project, including paving, curbing, striping, and landscaping. The project is comprised of wood-framed structures , with the presentation of a mining town theme as its focus . Since it is a restaurant, the work will be done as quickly as possible, with an estimated start date of the first part of July, and a completion date of November, 1986 . Since the existing property is flat and vacant, and the project involves no special uses or reviews , a quick and efficient completion is envisioned. • t o;4 R (B i{y A •m ;y 2 t; l J 1 �) F' CiP tY P. O.`bOX 196650 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6650 of � (907) 786-8160 4 TONY KNOWLES, Anchorage MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (3500 East Tudor Road) May 13, 1986 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I have personally known Mr. Ray Angelini as a general contractor in Anchorage since 1977. I consider him to be a very qualified building contractor with an extensive background in the construc- tion industry. Mr. Angelini has successfully completed several sizeable commercial projects in Anchorage, the most recent being the Sourdough Mining Company, Restaurant, one of the most success- ful eating establishments in the Municipality. I would readily recommend Mr. Angelini as a contractor from my personal knowledge of his ability and performance record. Sincerely, 4:847 ea'.174/C16E-:-- orm ;: Senior Plan Review Engineer MLS/jMc 'WY ftetcret4 GP) N. 5 Vg i IviAY 2 0 1986 • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT, . • OF R �-� ECF: I('fC;P-'C'>�-1--`c t $: 0 ° City of Renton Lu: -33 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0,9gT fD SEPI°It Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Sourdough Mining Company Restaurant 2. Name of applicant: MLA Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 233 Eastlake Ave. E. , Suite 201 Seattle , WA 98109 (206) 628-2911 Contact: Merrick D. Lentz 4. Date checklist prepared: ll 5. Agency requesting checklist: 1986 6. FAU seo timngtor schege c/innccu ng pZoni g,if aplablee Construction Start: July, 1986 Construction Completion: November, 1986 CITY new 3 1 FIN 11 Pry AY 0 1986 BUILDING/ZONING DEFT, 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related • to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. All City of Renton permits for Building, Mechanical, Electrical, Fire Sprinklers, and other related information. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Construction of 14000 SF Restaurant and a 1250 SF Convenience Store, including parking area improvements and required drainage. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient.information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Property is Lot 3 of Short Plat 014-81, located at approximately the 3700 Block of East Valley Road, north of the Monarch Motel, south of Shurgard Mini-storage, and between East Valley Road and State Route 167 , located in the south end of the City of Renton and one mile south of I-405 . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sandy gravel intermixed with clay and some organic materials; fines in excess of 5%. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No - 2 - e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Existing quantities of earth are envisioned to be adequate; structural fill will be inported for foundation. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Lot is flat; erosion is not considered to be a concern. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 85% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Implementation of standard erosion control measures during construction will be done as required. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust is likely to be generated during the construction process. This will be mitigated by utilizing watering as needed to control the dust. Cooking aromas are likely when b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? the Restaurant is opened. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None anticipated to be required. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No surface water body is present. A drainage channel runs from east to west across the property. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The drainage channel will be tight-lined as a part of the construction process.. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. A storm drainage system will be installed to direct the surface run-off water into the approved city storm water system. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain?. If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None - the buildings will connect into the existing sanitary sewer. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Run-off from buildings and paved areas will be collected into a designed storm retention and drainage system,. and transported to an approved City storm line. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally . describe. • No -,4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ❑ Shrubs y grass - wild only. ❑ crop or grain ❑ Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Site will be cleared and all vegetation removed from the area. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site will be fully landscaped utilizing a variety of trees , grass and shrubs indiginous to the area. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other mice, insects Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known, but not likely to be a disturbing use. - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: • No wildlife is endangered. Ground animals and insects, if present on the site at this time, will most likely relocate to surrounding, unimproved land. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity - Cooking, Cooling, Lighting Natural Gas - Cooking, Heating b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. Project is designed within the allowed heights, and surrounding property is already improved. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Insulation per state requirements . Hot Water Reclaimation HVAC Economisers Energy fficient Lighting and Equipment 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Trash from the building will be contained in an enclosed trash area and transported by local garbage companies . Any garbage spills will.be lean d byRestaurant staff. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be requires. Medical 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. if any: No adverse effects are anticipated. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic - 6 - i • 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction. operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction-related noise between 7 : 00 AM and 5 :00 PM, until restaurant is ready for occupancy. No major noise problems are inherent with the operation of the restaurant. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None anticipated to be needed. B. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant site with streets to the east and west, motel to the south, and a mini-storage building to the north. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not within the last 35 years. c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? al f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 80 people will work at this restaurant, counting all shifts . j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None needed - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project as designed is compatable with current and long-range uses . 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: , None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Maximum Height - 35 feet Stained, wood siding is to be utilized. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None anticipated 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot lighting, building illumination, neon signage. Lighting to be utilized between sunset and 2 :00 PM. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Exterior lighting will be designed and placed to avoid impact on any surrounding properties. - 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Project will provide an area for meeting, and will include some outside display areas for public use. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Refer to Site Plan sheet Al of plan set, included with this application. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes , within two blocks. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 135 provided, none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No - 9 - • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed • project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approx. 450 daily vehicle trips, heaviest at noon and 6 :00 PM!' g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Existing transportation services appear to be adequate to support this use. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Existing services appear to be sufficient without modification to service this new use. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None Needed 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Puget Power Natural Gas - Washington Natural Gas Telephone - Pacific Notrhwest Bell Sewer and Water - City of Renton C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: Merrick D. Lentz - 10 - #176 11-8-84 ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE \ ' 1 � I � / 11. 8111- 4-aV I I