Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6. SEPA Checklist_Updated 221028 SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 1 of 14 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 2 of 14 A. Background [HELP] 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ARB Flagship Store – Tenant Improvement & Change of Use 2. Name of applicant: Kevin Broderick, Broderick Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 55 S Atlantic Street #301, Seattle, WA 98134 Phone: 206.682.7525 4. Date checklist prepared: September 2, 2022 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ARB should like to move forward with the project as soon as possible. There is no phasing, the site will be fully developed with the proposed project. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report 4/19/22 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Administrative Site Plan Review, Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The project site is located on the east side Rainier Ave S at 720 Rainier Ave S (parcel number 1923059053). The project site totals 37,702 square feet in area and is located within the located in the Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning classification, Auto Mall Area B, Urban Design District D, and Commercial Mixed Use comprehensive plan designation. Use of the property and scope of the development proposes to remodel the existing building for ARB, with limited façade improvements (primarily signage), new main entry addition (213 SF), new training room addition (650 SF), and new 1- story addition (6,332 SF). The existing 498 SF mezzanine will be used for storage. The existing 9,570 SF building will be the proposed ARB Flagship store that would include on-site retail sales of vehicle accessories. Access to the site is proposed to remain via relocated driveway curb cut off Rainier Ave S. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 3 of 14 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 720 Rainier Ave S Renton, WA 98005 KC Parcel #: 192305-9053 Legal Description: LOT 1 LESS HWY PER DEED REC #20110815000477 OF RENTON LLA LUA- 02-025-LLA REC 20020515900009 LOCATED IN NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth [ a. General description of the site: (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. 20’-25’ of alluvial soils consisting of silt & silty, fine-grained sands on top of gravel and gravelly sands. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, given the site is underlain by alluvial soils and a relatively shallow groundwater table. Structures on this site are susceptible to settlement due to consolidation over time. The loose sand soils beneath the groundwater table are also susceptible to seismic liquefaction during a large earthquake. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The only fill / excavation would be associated with the new foundations, approximately 55 cy of structural fill material and potentially 120 cy of crushed rock below the new slab. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The site flat and is covered with impervious surfaces. Very low possibility of erosion depending on weather conditions. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 4 of 14 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 85% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Existing pavement areas should be used for truck loading and staging. Any spilled soil should be immediately cleaned up. Cut slopes and soil stockpiles should be covered with plastic during the wet weather. Following clearing or rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch of hydroseed bare areas that will not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious surface. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None known b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No emissions expected. 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. None. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 5 of 14 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The runoff is collected from impervious areas including roofs and parking areas. The proposed drainage system will predominately discharge to the existing storm system in Rainier Avenue South via a new underground storm drain. No flow control or water quality measures are proposed. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No, there are no waste materials being used on the site with this development. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: None proposed or required. 4. Plants [help] a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: ____deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ____evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ____shrubs ____grass ____pasture ____crop or grain ____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 6 of 14 ____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ____other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Kelsey’s Red Dwarf Twig Redwood, Salal, Common White Snowberry, Western Columbine, Large-Leaved Lupine, Garnet Penstemon, Creeping Mahonis, Western Sword Fern and Beach Strawberry e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________ b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: New landscaping e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity, for heating and lighting. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 7 of 14 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Code compliant insulation + low-e glazing, etc. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None known. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None known. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None known. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. EMS, fire department of required. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Temporary erosion and sediment control and perimeter flow control will be established prior to grading. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Earthmoving equipment. Generally, work hours would be 7am to 3:30pm M-F. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Work hours limited to a normal weekday work hours. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 8 of 14 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Property’s current use is an automotive sales and showroom. The adjacent property to the north is an automotive repair (tire center). The adjacent properties to the east are also automotive sales & showrooms. The adjacent property to the south is currently vacant. The proposal should not affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. c. Describe any structures on the site. An existing 9,540 SF auto sales and showroom building and existing 4,080 SF garage. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Commercial Arterial (CA), Auto Mall Area B. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Mixed Use. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.Wellhead Protection Area 2 & high seismic hazards are mapped on the project site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 16 – 20 people would be employed at the completed project. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 14 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed building modifications shall be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood and adjacent properties. The design shall also be compatible with the general goals, objectives, policies, and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations, and any other plans, programs, maps or ordinances of the city of Renton. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: Not applicable. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height is 22’-10” tall. The primary exterior materials include painted stucco, corrugated metal siding, flat metal panels, & CMU. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The design of the renovations follow the requirements of the Urban Design District D. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Exterior lighting will be provided on the entry element to provide accent lighting and downlighting along walking areas. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? All light fixtures will be shielded and offer indirect lighting. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 10 of 14 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Streetlights. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: On-site lighting will be shielded, indirect lighting. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers? If so, specifically describe. The existing sales and showroom was built in 1965 and is not on a historic registry. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. None known. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. WISAARD Washington Information System for Architectural and Archeological Records Data: https://fortress.wa.gov/dahp/wisaardp3/ d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Rainier Avenue S is an arterial street located along the west side of the site and is the primary driveway access to the site. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 11 of 14 b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, the site is serviced by Metro Transit routes 560, 102, 160, 167, 566, & F-line with a northbound stop approximately 0.1 miles north of the site past S 7th Street. The site is also serviced by Metro Transit route 566 with a southbound stop across Rainer Avenue S, approximately 0.1 miles walking distance utilizing the crosswalk at the intersection of Rainier Avenue S & S 7th Street to the north. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? The proposal is not eliminating any existing parking spaces nor providing any additional spaces. There are currently 21 parking spaces provided on site that will be restriped as necessary. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposal will require the addition of (2) bicycle parking spaces. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. None nearby. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? The Trip Generation Memorandum indicates the project would generate: 55 weekday trips, 16 am weekday peak hour trips, and -1 weekday pm peak hour trip. Resource: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition for Land Use Codes (LUC) 943 (Automobile Parts and Service Center) and LUC 840 (Automobile Sales – New). g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 12 of 14 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ___________ b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water: There is an existing 8” water main that traverses the south side of the property before crossing to the parcel to the south near the mid-point of the property’s south property line. There is also (1) existing 1” domestic water service and (1) existing ¾” domestic water line servicing the site. The proposal plans to reuse or upgrade the existing water services as necessary. Sewer: C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: _______________________________ Name of signee __Kevin Broderick___________________________________ Position and Agency/Organization ___Architect / Broderick Architects________ Date Submitted: ___10/28/2022__________ SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 13 of 14 D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page 14 of 14 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.