No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA86-043 BEGINNING OF FILE F'LET'TLE MICROFILMED (1 .1,1 0 klifilL / 1 0 1 \ • RENTON BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT `': ' i \ PUBLIC HEARING MEETING j t, — . C1LtillIES. b MEETING 0110-75/MAY 20. 1975 • BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT • `l ,'ji Felix Campanella, Francis Holman, John Qualls, Gary Smith and Kenneth Swanig..,n. ' ,e CITY Y STAFF PRESENT ----1.1 James C. Hanson, Developmental Services Division; Mary Pringle, Recording Secretary. • _4M _ . r V;' 1. CALL TO ORDER . The regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment was called to order by Vice- Chairman Smith at 8:05 P.M. 161 - 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE a1 The Vice-Chairman led those p-� present in the flagsalute. .8 , ' :. 3. ROLL CALL . ,si. The secretary called the roll. All members were present with the exception of LALLY, who had previously advised that she would be out of town, and PETERSON, lik who had a conflicting appointment. illIA ACTION: Motion made by HOLMAN, seconded by CAMPANELLA, that .the abaetat rseribalta t`0 be excused. ('iOTION CARRIED. g4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES P4 *II ACTION: Motion made by SWANIGAN, seconded by HOLMAN, that .the nunutee o¢ the s Maui:. 18, 1975 meeting be app;2 i,n oved as pkted. MOTION CARRIED. r 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED Agr (a) V-265-75 DR. H. M. ALLENBACH requests variance to reduce number .h7 of parking stalls to six; property located in the vicinity of a 3600 East Valley Road, Renton ( $It Mr. Campanella stated at this time that he would refrain from participating as a Board member as his firm was the architect for the ro p posed development and 4 3' he would make the presentation for the applicant. 1 ;,°5' The Vice-Chairman opened the public hearing. Mr. Hanson read the applicant's answers to questions on the variance application and then showed slides of the property involved. :4. Mr. Campanella announced that he would represent both Dr. Allenbach, owner of the property, and Continental, Inc., the developer. He advised that Continental, 1 Inc. over the past several years had been involved in several complexes similar to the one under considerati::•r., currently operating one in Lynnwood and one in Bellevue and opening or.:°: in ?'c ural'way, with several in eastern Washington, as well as the one in Renton, .n the planning stages. He pointed out on plot plan the proposed storage buildings, the apartment for , the one fall tima,C;plgyev„•.tt,:e of iea area. the six parking stalls proposed, Yd showed the method of going through the project, and pointed out the areas where E{,"'':" landscaping would be placed. He advised they feel six parking stalls would meet ' - --._ . \ t 1 ;l , 0 ' RENTON bOAF--1" ADJUSTMENT RELIC HEAL MEETING MEETING Oliv=id/MAY 20, 1975 PAGE TWO • requirement for office and apartment but do have space for three additional stalls if necessary. Ho pointed out that after initial office contact to rent space, users would probably visit area not more than once a month as storage • only would be allowed. In answer to Board's question regarding correspondence received, Mr. Ha' read letter dated May 7, 1975 from King County Department of Public Work. Cy; garding location of P-9 drainage channel and at their further request read Planning Department's recommendation on this application. The Board questioned Mr. Campanella regarding number of parking stalls required and/or provided in the Lynnwood and Bellevue developments and questioned Mr. Hanson on need for the 15 stalls suggested by the Planning Department. In answer to further question, Mr. Hanson stated the proposed landscaping plan appeared to be more than adequate but he felt Planning Department should have the right to review those plans. • The public portion of the hearing was closed. • ACTION: Motion made by HOLMAN, seconded by SWANIGAN, that vaai,anee be panted 6nom .the parking and Loading oadinance warehouse paMhing +tequiAensecot becauee the epeci6ic use iq diseufh,Q.alt in inten8.cty damn the no.'u,,a2 warehou4e/o66ice 6acieity, and ataict eempti:[nce maid dep ive the eubject ptopetty o6 R,i.gh,ta and ptivitegea enjoyed by other pttopentiea in the vicinity, with the condition that developer have hie tandscap- cng p£a►t4 app:eved by the Panning Depa Osent. • Roll call vote of members present, with the exception of CAMPANELLA, followed. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Prior to the reading of next public hearing,,CAMPANELLA resumed his seat with the Board. (b) V-266-75 GARY N. BATES requests variance to construct deck within required 25' rear yard; property located in the vicinity of 851 Monroe Avenue N.E., Renton The Vice-Chairman opened the hearing. Mr. Hanson read applicant's answers to questions on the variance application and then presented a plot plan, describing the lot, pointing out power right-of-way, and advising that applicant presently has existing patio cover which he proposes to remove upon addition of second story and deck. He then showed slides of the subject property. Mr. Gary Bates, 851 Monroe Avenue N.E., was present to speak in behalf of his application. He reviewed their planned addition, advising their plans had not been finalized pending decision of variance application. He presented a plan which he advised was only preliminary. The Board questioned applicant regarding type and size of deck, size of the existing patio cover, and the need for size deck planned. The public portion of the hearing was cjesed- ACTION: Motion made by QUALLS, seconded by CAMPANELLA, that variance be ynan.ted with the condition that any new StAuctufte ie not to exceed ex.istcng dimen,ion o6 gatio cot'ez. Discussion followed or. the r: ••;, HOLMAN suggested that the motion be changed to allow 10' x 18' de:. 'ndi ed preliminary plan rather than the size of the existing patio cover, ti:.:.:rt x :.i;', It was consensus of opion of the other • members that because was preliminary some latitude should be allowed as in final p:anniir; 71ght :e decided to use the existing patio as a base. —Roll call vote followed, with the f:i10 inq'result: CA.MPANELLA, t:UALLS; SMITH and SWAN'IGAN - Aye; 'ni*4N - .\�. Mt':"';", CARRIED. • • a ,! a 14 ,ANNIN, I�ErA. TMLNT STAR- RLPJR1 /. F i.. BOARD OP Ail,.`', ;'•'(``ill MAY ?)a` 15$ pU©l li; ti1r1121N6' • - ;Aof�l.4tANT: ' Oil, li,M, Al,L1NIIACH , s,,.�-1 lT0tIOTInz V-26S-75, Variance to Reduce Number of Parking , Stalls From Sixty-Flue to Six; Property' in. the Vicinity of 3600 ta',t Vallry ,Ro+frt, ilenton, ZO4Mt'NTs. 1; The proposed plan. indicates approximately 95,000 square feet of warehouse space, 9a,0.00 square feet at 1 space per 1,500 • square feet yeilds a parking requirement ' " per the Parking and Loading Ordinance of 63 stalls. The apartment will require -2. stalls, and the office. area is, unknown. • Therefore, the total parking requirement is 65 plus stalls. 2.: 65 parking stalls-would require approx.i-_ - - - • mately 23,400 square feet of site area. In addition those spaces Would probably be located adjacent to the front of the development and East Valley Road and would require a minimum 5' landscape strip, ' along the public right-of-way and 5% in- .. terior landscaping, , 3) Surrounding properties are zoned L-1 and M-P Manufacturing Park. ' • 4; The proposed self-service storage facility differs from the usual warehouse in that . it is hot a retail or wholesale outlet and . distribution facility for merchandise. There is, only one full' time employee for the' en tire facility. All loading and unloading of items stored is accomplished by the in- dividual renter' at his particular unit. . 5) Obviously there is a need for 'some additional parking for guests and potential renters in - - - quiring at the front gffice.' However; 65 spaces may be too excessive. A more 'reason- able figure might be 1 space per 75 units 12 spaces, plus the 2 spaces required for the ' caretaker's apartment, plus the requirement for the office area, or approximately..15 aces tei. ' • i:iC0Mt,!iNZATIONi Recommend approval of a 'variance from the parking and loading ordinance warehouse parking require- ment because the specific use is dissimilar in intensity from the normal warehouse/office facil- ity, and strict compliance would deprive the subject.proper•ty of rights and proviliges en- joyed by other properties in the vicinity. ,,ever, ,.c, re property s—Tocation nor a .-. *'.s?:ufact.r`, , Park none, its visibility from 'major trans :' ' nn routes, the addition of i T a,: A: t.e• ,4,',3 square feet of buildable area t ...,.,,,.: a s, . ri;e, and so as not to Y •a '�'t - ;ice;' -��icr.,@..- a ,,a�;,i3 .;._ 'w,o ,•„_,:,.o;,, ,4;�_ • iwarytn+-.-`}tr.tr....u.v.w......,....-.- ..�-w_ .eta.. �....s...a ........._..�._._�..u.w...�._.._u....`�.+.+.-....«._.._ _�, 1 • 0 constitute a grant or special priviloclo, the variance rs s•ubject to the following conditions; 1) , Ivy lieu of the required parking the devel- oper shall provide a minimum 5 foot land- scape strip adjacent to East Valley Road • and the Valley Freeway as part of their • detailed landscape plan. The plan shall • be subject to the landscaping require • • - �:. ments of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. . ' 2) A total of 15 parking spaces shall t ; ro vided for guests and potential customer: adjacent to East Valley Road. • sue' APPLICANT: GARY W. BATES • APPLICATION: V-266-75, Request Variance to Construct Deck Within Required 25' Rear Yard COMMENTS: 1) Property is zoned R-1 single family residence. 2) Property is severly restricted by the 100 ' foot power line easement. (±1,700 square feet) Structures are not permitted within • this easement. • 3) The existing rear yard is approximately 25' in depth. , • • 4) There is an existing 20' wide patio cover extending into the rear yard approximately 12 feet. (approximately 240 square feet) 5) The total front yard including the power- line is approximately 125 feet. (±8,500 square feet) The total lot demensions are • 184 x 68 or 12,512 square feet. . ' • 6) The proposal is to restructure the patio. cover into a 10' x 20' balcony that would be utilized off a proposed second story . • addition over the existing house. - . 7) There are other existing balconies on 2 story houses in the area that are on lots . not so encumbered by such unbuildable ease- ments. However,' these balconies only ' extend approximately 5-6 feet out from the house. 8) If the property were not encumbered by the powerline easement there would be more than sufficient property to construct the pro- • posed balcony as per ordinance standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ' Recommend approval of a variance to construct • a balcony extending into the rear yard no more than 6. feet or extent of the existing balconies on houses at 711 and 717 Monroe Avenue N.E. This variance is granted due to the conditions • stated.in .the comments above which create special • • circumstahces that deprive the subject property of rights and provileges enjoyed by other pro- ai,,.,es in the vicinity and identical :one class- 1 Mien' The recommended variance is the • • .J variance that will accomplish said • '" :C.;.£<.'.%iw'.Y-! .suit]>.�ei, .,.y :,':,. • r `f. VL 3253Z NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE FLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: Shrgard Income Properties II - SA 043-86 Add three concrete tilt up storage buildings to an existing complex of storage buildings. Site area 197,615 square feet. Existing buildings 63,905 square feet. Proposed buildings 20,881 square feet. GENERAL LOCATION: 3600 East Valley Road. PUBLIC APPROVALS: Building Permit Site Plan Approval The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washin ton residing in WEN roly on they jN day of !- .,_� 1986. , o a �� C. e `� SIGNED. • p. .16P BI\G o.•= a / ..•G 8 , ti 'F �00 OF R4,� , �y Cs BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT , RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR 09 umon �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 • 0 9,q, SEP1,40 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: August 8, 1986 TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk FROM: Roger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administr o SUBJECT: SHURGARD INCOME PROPERTIES 02/SA-043-86 The attached yellow file is being transmitted to the City Clerk for permanent records. The Site Plan Review Committee on Wednesday, June 11, 1986, approved the site plan for Shurgard Income Properties. The Committee report was formally issued on June 20, 1986. The appeal period expired on Monday, July 7, 1986, without an appeal being submitted. RJB:ss 3047Z cm, OF r:','".'"7 r"t1 r7--_____ 'AUG 1 2 1986 , e ' 1172N June 20. 1986 SLTE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: SHURGARD INCOME PROPERTIES II (RODERICK PARR & ASSOCIATES) SA-043-86 LOCATION: 3600 East Valley Road SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approval of a site plan to allow the expansion of an existing 63.905 square foot' mini-storage facility by adding 20.881 square feet in three (3) one-story concrete tilt up buildings on a 4.53 acre site. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Approval with conditions. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 11:45 a.m. on Wednesday. June 11. 1986 in the 3rd floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. 4 The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comments from all divisions of the Public Works Department. both divisions of the Building and Zoning Department. and the Fire. Parks. and Policy Development Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: EXHIBIT #1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication. and other documentation pertinent to this request. EXHIBIT #2 Site Plan FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the written record in the matter. the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant. Roderick E. Parr & Associates for Surgard Income Properties II. has requested site plan approval to allow the construction of 3 one story tilt up concrete buildings total 20.811 square feet to add to an existing mini-storage warehouse facility located on 4.53 acres. 2. The application file containing the application. the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from "various city departments. the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C. 1971. as amended), a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued by for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the responsible official. ' 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject site is locatd at 3600 East Valley Road. 6. The existing mini-storage warehouse facility containing 63.905 square feet of building space within 10 one story building was constructed in 1976 under builidng permit number B-4503. a SHURGARD INCOME PRIUrr.RTIES II SA-043-86 June 20. 1986 Page 2 7. The property was zoned L-1. Light Industrial at the time of building permit application on April 11. 1986. Subsequently the property was rezone to MP. Manufacturing Park on April 26. 1986. Therefore, the application request was processed under the L-1 zoning classification. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal is an expansion of permit use in the L-1. Light Industrial Zone. It represents expansion of approximately 30% of the original facility constructed in 1976. The proposal is appropriate for the subject site. 2. Specific design issues raised by various City departments focus on: (1) accessibility of fire apparatus to exisiting fire hydrant. (2) fire sprinkling of building over 12.000 square feet, and . (3) access for both building and grounds maintenance to the eastern 20 feet of the subject site. 3. The proposal places Building #4 to close to the existing fire hydrants for proper operation during an emergency situation involving Building #4. It does not appear that the fire hydrants could be relocated without creating the same problem with other adjacent building. Therefore. Building #4 should be reduced in size. 4. The Uniform Fire Code of the City of Renton requires building over 12.000 square feet in size to be sprinklered. Proposed addition to Building #12 will make the building exceed the 12,000 square foot limit and it would be required to be sprinklered. 5. Access to the eastern twenty feet of the site should be provided to allow maintenance of the building and required landscaping. It would allow continued fire access to east side of existing Building #12. 6. Existing landscaping along the eastern property line is not adequate to buffer the site from SR-167. The landscaping should be supplimented with the planting of evergreen trees to provide year round screening. DECISION The site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Building #4 shall be reduce 20 feet in length and place so that the existing fire hydrants are at least 10 feet from the building walls. 2. These fire hydrants shall be protected with bollards. 3. The landscaping along the eastern property line shall be supplimented with the placement of evergreen trees to the approval of the City's Landscape Architect at the time of building permit review and approval. 4. If the proposed addition to Building #12 becomes a separate building (#13). it shall be located far enough away from the existing Building #12 to allow adequate access for the maintenance of the twenty foot landscape strip and the building. For purposes of these decisions the terms "Should" and "Shall" are to be considered mandatory. The term "May" will be considered decretionary. ORDERED THIS 20th day of June. 1986. 0.-ge__ 7. ---S ' 6ck_ ROGE J.`BLAYLOC . ZONIN ^ •MINISTRATOR FOR THE SITE PLAN REVIEW CO MIT TEE I 1 tir SHURGARD INCOME PROPERTIES II SA-043-86 June 20. 1986 Page 3 TRANSMITTED THIS 20th day of June, 1986 to the parties of record: Scott Hass Roderick G. Parr & Associates. Inc. P.S. 3625 132nd Avenue S.E.. Suite #220 Bellevue. Washington 98006 Shurgard Income Properties II First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue. Suite 1001 Seattle. Washington 98104 TRANSMITTED THIS 20th day of June. 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson. Building & Zoning Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Memebers. Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon. Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before 5 p.m. on Monday, July 7. 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure. errors of law or fact. error in judgement, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonalby available prior to the meeting date of June 11. 1986 may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator in the Building and Zoning Department for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Committee's Official publishing of the decision, which is Friday. June 20, 1986. This request shall set for th the specific errors relied upon by such appellant. and the Committee may, after review of the record. take further action as it deems proper. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV. Section 3011(B)(1), which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on Monday, July 7. 1986. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process for site plan approvals include: (1) the Public Works Director, (2) the Building and Zoning Director. (3) the Policy Development Director, (4) the Hearing Examiner. and (5) members of the City Council. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents fof the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial Committee decision. but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. 1172N RJB 1158N SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 11. 1986 THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM: IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: ECF-031-86 SHURGARD STORAGE Application for site plan approval to construct three concrete tilt-up storage buildings to an existing complex of storage buildings. ` P �TFD SEFTE� OF PENDING SITE PLAN AP ' LICATION SA 043-86 SHURGARD INCOf1E PROPERTIES II DESCRIPTION :. .., ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDIfJGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS. SITE AREA 197,615 SQUARE FEET EXISTING:BUILDINGS 63,905 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED BUILDIfJGS 20,881 SQUARE FEET GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: 3600 EAST VALLEY ROAD PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : BUILDING PERf'1IT SITE PLAN APPROVAL • PUBLIC COMMENTS V1/1l.L BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION RENTO\ WILDING & ZONING DEPAF , NT ' ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF -0 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN. APPROVAL 043-86 PROPONENT : SHURGARD STOREAGE PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ' APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION : Fpn FAST VAJ LFY RQAIl TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : MINF 11-86 ' El ENGINEERING DIVISION . TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION . 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ri PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT . 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT E POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �T/,�/TY £NG/A/E e/A/6 /0APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED r a� LATE ARREEMENT- Mo �"` . LATE COMERS AOREEMERT-SEWEWATERR No SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER XLES V .D sQ. r. x /9z Z/sd - '7 909.�D SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER ,-..5,,, D.Q¢ " ./ = 7 9?1i. C A. ME SPECIALASSESSM if."'1RE;;IARGE-WATER AO I /S, <57'a9. ' SPECIAL ASSESSMEN(..- ''..GE„ S® EWER /Vd - - , APPROVED WATER PR�a€ ll, ,� - r-- ., .,, , _ - APPROVED SEWER PLAN _ "j APPROVED FIRE ..A6 a . • .a Ofi R IRE DEd . ✓ lFIRE FLOW ANALYSIS (4\,,\ dr. DATE: /2- /7 SIGNATURE CijDIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTO UILDING & ZONING DEPAR TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF -03.1E - 8 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN. APPROVAL 043-86 PROPONENT : SHURGARD STOREAGE PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION : 600 EAST VJLEY 2110 TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : UNI' 11-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION j TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : • UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT. POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS1OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I /�ft/L"/� -A/ //>' ivy El APPROVED ❑ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Vo 7'2,/ /e rs Ylo7 DATE: ` � /% of , SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR ZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI- VENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF. -031 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN. APPROVAL 043-86 PROPONENT: SHURGARD STOREAGE PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION : 3600 FAST VALLEY $nAD TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ,1IJNF 11-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ❑ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU . El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT rj(I BUILDING 1110•110161111 DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : -AL-) L 'J-APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED �irGc C. =�/�' . . DATE: Z-- //U—A SIGNATU E DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTO: IUILDING & ZONING DEPAR ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF -031 - 86 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN. APPROVAL 043-86 PRAY ?, ?, 1986 PROPONENT : SHURGARD STOREAGE POLICY_ „c_ �yv-,, ...0_0P...'� PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION : 600 FAST VAJ I FY RnAn TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : JUNF 11-86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT XPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON . REVIEWIN DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A7LK'-c J f/r\&-I\L. I APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED _.5-o- e_ ,FrA9'7, . 4 3ig6- . P. P A.,„„,,,, DATE : U �K SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE V REVISION 5/1982 r,-,.-n 1R7 4 RENT()- BUILDING & ZONING DEPAF; —ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW :• r ' ET J /o , � ECF -0 - s�L_ - / 1 fir "/ APPLICATION No(s) : SITE PLAN. APPROVAL 043-86 `;li 2, c' PROPONENT: SHURGARD STOR#`AGE - ?,70�� PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION : 3600 EAST V .1IFY ROAD TO : Ei PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ANF 11-86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 0 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ylFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT E .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : RtAp_ No v emit o ii APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED cl�®� Te4$S — dyii.41,.41 -tin. c166,1 gyetA la iC7"I."Lcs 5oris,ine__,_ . 136.1- O, 'lt / Pt- ia Lme a-ti.C(y i P e. AceSS u !u in kar.14 j r i . r '4 , DATE: 5 'v2 3 ' ' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A T ORIZED REP; SENTATIVE / REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTC `_3UILDING & ZONING DEPAF' 'RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF -031 - 8 _ APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL 043-86 PROPONENT: SHURGARD STOREAGE PROJECT TITLE ; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION ; - 600 FAST VAI I Fy RflAil TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : , IINF 11-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ?3 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT 0 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : FAW0 PalgW-00 El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED inAtimwremir CSC_ s � � Covv et .r ' 1f .t < I / 1 ceAkt- -0 UfjA-c-Qt- , iiir\CSiCA)lirlj . 0-01A,i Lcri---k -1-L-J2.- - -- V-c(---Ult Ask\ 04 Q 4.1. .) V4f2S2s2t �f ova.y. Skit-a.yda- hetrio e.,,,,,,,f,--, DATE : c 5/2 0‘ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 182 RENTO WILDING & ZONING DEPAF 'TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF -03 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN. APPROVAL 043-86 PROPONENT : SHURGARD STOREAGE PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION : 600 EAST LEY ROAD TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ,IIINF 11-86 ❑ ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ❑ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1101011111011119 ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS 'OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON! REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2CR )IC)(7 111 APPROVED ri APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED �- / K G'SD- Lk D._sc k\DI (OG KoNG v mV r.r �� � � I NA- Jr) \S I\)a'I S IB r c-1'0I` ��o l,t� iVL Y �r) TO ��� �. ��o� w I-rI-1 ' E 6 u I GD 1(06 '2)6 f ) rAK\ON-Y- .3 P15 0 .scjir01 -TO NN) r\) uLf ' r o�lA-i\ � l� 1 DATE : - 2 (eV) SIGNATURE OF DIREC(TOt\ OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �J REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTO 3UILDING & ZONING DEPAF TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF -031 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN. APPROVAL 043-86 PROPONENT : SHURGARD STOREAGE PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION : .FOO FACT VA.LFy .RfAIl TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : J(INF 11-86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION E] TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 1g POLICE DEPARTMENT. POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED DATE: SIG ATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTO'" WILDING & ZONING DEPAF . TENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF -031 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN. APPROVAL 043-86 PROPONENT: SHURGARD STOREAGE PROJECT TITLE : BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE BUILDINGS LOCATION : 600 EAST VAJ J FY RnAn TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ,1(1NF 11-86 ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : • UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT. • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : cu APPROVED APPROVED WITH DITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ' 1143N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON. WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following project: SHURGARD STORAGE (ECF-031-86) Application to build three concrete tilt-up storage buildings adding 20.881 square feet to an existing complex; property located 3600 East Valley Road. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. (ECF-020-86) Application for special permit to grade a 6.7 acre site to remove 185.000 cubic yards. file SP-023-86; property located 800 block Rainier Avenue North. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department. Municipal Building, Renton. Washington. 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by June 9. 1986. Published: May 26, 1986 1142N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-031-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: -SA-043-56 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to build three concrete tilt-up storage buildings adding 20,881 square feet to an existing complex. PROPONENT: Shurgard Storage LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located 3600 East Valley Road • LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than June 9, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: May 21, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: May 26, 1986 ‘ —�� .11211rei Ronald G. Nelson . Spri - Building and Zoning Director Po icy DevelopInnt Dirac o r � 1 Richard C. H ghton Public Works Director •ti ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 28, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 8, 1986 ECF - 031 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). /A PROPONENT: SHl1RGARn STflRAGF PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BLDGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX TO ADD 20,881 SQ FT LOCATION: 3600 EAST VALLEY RD SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): 20,881 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 11`- 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ) - 14) Transportation 15) Public Services D` 16) Utilities _ 7L COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS El MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED By: ' TITLE: DATE: `J Ci'��. FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW ShL' I' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `i ` 8 l tD g DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 28, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 8, 1986 ECF - 031 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). PROPONENT: SHURGARD STnPAGF PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION 10 ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BLDGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX TO ADD 20,881 SQ FT LOCATION: 3600 EAST VALLEY RD SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): 20,881 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth i 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 1 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS [] MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: r4:722- C- (04/t TITLE: DATE: (/////2:5--- --A FORM (#14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (C 1L1 `DE v _o ' DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 28, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 8, 1986 ECF - 031 _ 86 cn If VF KENTON APPLICATION NO(s). AP R 9 1986 PROPONENT: SHI IRGAR❑ ST(1RAGF pna ir.v nrvgl_OPloorr ncr PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BLDGS.1 TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX TO ADD 20,881 SO FT LOCATION: 3600 EAST VALLEY RD SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): 20,881 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACTT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth v 2) Air !/ 3) Water 4) Plants I/ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources // '' 7) Environmental Health i/ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 1/ 10) Aesthetics // i '': 11) Light and Glare � 12) Recreation //- 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 1� 16) Utilities I COMMENTS: .iii- _4 , r , - ac.,..,_ „y,i,.4 „azy,e_i_k.,s, - d,..i ,.,;v ,,,,u,_7,z., ,A,..,.... .., e,,,,,lv ';Zy.'' ,(00:.9.61-0/e-42.. //ow Ce-fre..14 409.-41- .....1L-:,..: /441rcu4P/7t 7.,,,i/z,..€4 fitiz, „2.sir 5 - g 63exe,„/C., I) sei,r...,i) - ,„,../.....46-,..A.40-, ‘,/ -7 ,/,...., , . '.4 ‘.......----ez,.......„ . , 4 tiff ' / 14 ,SAj.../.427.1./iitiellici ix'v 14et:A94-4.,...-Le,,,,,o449 1, • I,J ilt34'83 e - �-, y/a3�s4 .a fii -r RECOMMENDATION: DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED By: U ors TITLE: 1 13/4.4.+.ite►^- DATE: 51(31 e6 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: `1 A 2,e S DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 28, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 8, 1986 ECF - 031 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). PROPONENT: SHf1RGARl STfIRAAF PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BLDGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX TO ADD 20,881 SQ FT LOCATION: 3600 EAST VALLEY RD SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): 20,881 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: qop,* no-t rn ► pact�s � � 1( RECOMMENDATION: DNS f MITIGATED DNS Q EIS REVIEWED BY: G TITLE: / 91ff DATE: UT FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET / p ce_,fl Dep2 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F I R v'f7 '7 7?) 2 DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 28, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 8, 1986 40 ECF - 031 - 86 01PR .8 APPLICATION NO(s). • 40E4. PROPONENT: SHl1R(;AR1l STfRAAF PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION 10 ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BLDGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX TO ADD 20,881 SQ FT LOCATION: 3600 EAST VALLEY RD SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): 20,881 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: .eEQ(//"Airo st7 ft CoF/ouJ „Ir/,"v�eE OF e/- icArD e/iy , ieE .eE,cio E.0 •ed ,}s 'e'EQL/fR. l9-L/s ,e 6 V/E' i -'/ 4r.4.v Ca m4 fe. RECOMMENDATION: [77( DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: / 74!4 A1.fts'i.6sfd DATE: gP,ei'' 301/99.4 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: UT 1 LI 11 E S DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 28, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: MAY 8, 1986 ECF - 031 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). PROPONENT: SHl1R1ARn STnRA(F PROJECT TITLE: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BLDGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX TO ADD 20,881 SQ FT LOCATION: 3600 EAST VALLEY RD SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): 20,881 IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services `// 16) Utilities " COMMENTS: ) ;1 g/C(° (,,f1/7 RECOMMENDATION: EZ DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: — TITLE: t,L/r/ DATE: �! Zl /ez, FORM ##14 REVISED 9/10/85 • 1142N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-031-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: -0113$(0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to build three, concrete tilt-up storage buildings adding 20,881 square feet to an existing complex. PROPONENT: Shurgard Storage LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located 3600 East Valley Road LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than June 9. 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: May 21, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: May 26, 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Spri 1;Li Building and Zoning Director Po icy Develop z.nt Direc r Richard C. H ghton Public Works Director .4(VY. o I` :TY OF RENTO FILE NO(S): ��i 'C1v}'2,- 1;, E; ® 4' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ,0 1 -'( , ♦ • mu MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME RODERICK G. PARR & ASSOCIATES._ INC. P.S. FEES Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESSED 3625 132nd Ave. S.E. Suite #220 sPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, Wa. 98006 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE i SITE PLAN APPROVAL 'j3 Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 644-4000 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* From Section: NAME I * Justification Required 4 SCOTi' HAAS ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: SAME AS ABOVE ® SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT ED PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: J NAME PLAT NAME: SHURL ARI) TNCOMF. PROPF.RTTP.S TT ADDRESS., PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: irst Interstate Center 999 Third Ave. Suite 1001 Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL Seattle, Wa. 98104 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 628-3200 U Residential CDIndustrial 0 Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Q TENTATIVE 3600 East Valley Road 0 PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING FINAL Storage L-1 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Storage NUMBER OF SPACES:. _ 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES __, TOTAL FEES �Q�j �� AREA: 1196,020 4.5 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DAj-E� AIP (l ipi APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: i APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ' MAY 2 11986 L7 Accepted Incomplete Notification Sent On By: QM DIR1r?/7-\T�. CEPT" (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: UAccepted QIncomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: Q Building Q Design Eng. Q Fire Parks El Police 0 Policy Dev. 0 Traffic Eng. Q Utilities -.ter RRVTSRf 1-g1_on Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). THE 4.5 ACRES WHICH IS THE APPROXIMATE NORTH 446.71 FEET OF A PARCEL OF T.AND TN THF. SOTTTHWF-ST 1/4 OF SOUTHPAW 1/4 OF SF.C:TTON TOWNSHTP NORTH RANG . 5 F. ST W M BOUNDED ON THE. WEST BY 92nd AVENUE. SOTTTH. ON THE NORTH BY NORTH LINE OF SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4, ON THE EAST BY WEST BOUNDARY OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5, AND THE SOUTH BY A LINE 250 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 30. LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RF.NTON- COTTNTY OF KING STATE. OF WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT I, SCOTT HAAS , being duly sworn, declare that I am ®authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS p DAY OF 0-1 19 fa . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT (Name of iNot rg y Public) -f-Owner-)-- (Representative) RODERICK G. 'PARR & ASSOCIATES,INC. , P.S. 3 (./.2-" te 3625 132nd Ave. S.E. Suite 220 (Address) (Address) Bellevue, Wa. 98006 i (City) (State) (Zip) J (206)644-4000 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 OF RA. ECF: • 103i - 8(40 I 4„s z City of Renton LU: -043-R6 , „o WL 41/2), e�Q�' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST cry( Ui- HENTON . Ep sEPTE� APR 2 1986 Purpose of Checklist: POLICY nPH.q MT ncr.- The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,2IC RCW, requires all • governmental agencies to consider the environmental Impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply.", Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or Its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may. ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) • Complete. this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),. the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ' SHURGARD STOREAGE, 3600 EAST VALLEY ROAD, RENTON 2. Name of3applicant: RODERICK G. PARR Si ASSOCIATES, INC. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3625 132nd S.E. Suite #220 Bellevue, Wa. 98006 SCOTT 1-1AAS (206)644-4000 • 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/31/86 ; 5. Agency requesting checklist: RENTON BUILDING DEPARTMENT 6.I Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): CM OF L'ZiN't;OM • 6r 1- APR 2 5 1986 ULM-, "6 7: Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. • NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NONE • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NONE . 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. BUILDING PERMIT 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and • the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. . ADD THREE CONCRETE TILT UP STORAGE BUILDINGS TO AN EXISTING COMPLEX OF STORAGE, BUILDINGS. THE SITE AREA IS 197,615 S.F. THE EXISTING BUILDINGS OCCUPY 63,905 S.F. THE NEW BUILDINGS WILL OCCUPY 20,881 SQ.. FT. • 12. Location of the proposal. Give.sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). ,Provide a legal description, : site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate:;: .-.:r; ; maps or detailed plans submitted with- any permit applications related to this checklist. . 3600 EAST VALLEY ROAD LOCATED IN SECTION 30, 'TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH • . a. General description of the site (circle one); CD rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0.5% 'c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. ' C-Vn • rtI- �- . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate . vicinity? If so, describe. . HO - 2 - a. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or • grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. NONE f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, •or use? If so, • generally describe. NO g. About what percent of the site will_be covered with Impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? • • 95% NEW BUILDINGS WILL BE BUILT ON AREAS PRESENTLY PAVED. AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WILL BE THE SAME AS EXISTING. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NONE REQUIRED • 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and -when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. MINIMAL INCREASE IN AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC • . b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? • none •" c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, • if any: none required • 3. - WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater.: lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. . .. NONE • , 2) Will the project require any work over. in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) • the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. NO . 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge_material that would be placed in or • removed from sifrfabe tiiiSter or wetlands'and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE . - 3 - • - - • - 4) Will the propusdi require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. NO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan: NO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the .type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NO b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. NO 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). - Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONE c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. STORM WATER SYSTEM IS ALREADY IN PLACE IN EXISTING COMPLEX. BUILDINGS ARE TO BE BUILT ON PRESENTLY PAVED AREAS SO RUNOFF WILL'REMAIN THE SAME.•.' ' - , r • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. . NO - 4 - d. Proposed meas t to reduce or control surface. gr i,. and runoff water impacts, if any: NONE REQUIRED 4. Plants • a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir. cedar, pine, other o Shrubs o grass o crop or grain • o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NONE c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: LANDSCAPING ALREADY IN PLACE 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals' which have been observed on or near the site • or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbi s other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NO - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: NONE REQUIRED 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas. oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ELECTRICAL LIGHTING • b. Would your.project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. NO c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this • proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts. if any: NONE 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NONE 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental.health hazards. if any: NONE REQUIRED b. Noise • 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? NONE • - 6 - v 2 What types yp an( - > vals of noise would be created by . associated with the V project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. MINIMALLY INCREASED AUTOMOBILE TRAFFIC 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: NONE REQUIRED 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? ..:.:..•:. THIS SITE - STORAGE BUILDINGS, VEHICLE STORAGE ADJACENT SITE - JUNK YARD b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. ' no c. Describe any structures on the site. existing storage buildings d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? no e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? L-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? N.A. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. . h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. NO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 2-3 LIVE AND/OR WORK AT EXISTING MANAGER'S UNIT j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? ( k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: • NONE REQUIRED - 7 ' 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NONE REQUIRED 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ) b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: NONE REQUIRED 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 15'-8" b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: NONE REQUIRED 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NONE REQUIRED • - 8 - 12... Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities' are in the immediate vicinity? NONE b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so. describe. • NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: NONE REQUIRED 7° 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed'for. 'national. state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NO • b. Generally describe any.landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE KNOWN c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:` 14. TransportationREQURIED -. - a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. DIRECT ACCESS TO/FROM EAST VALLEY ROAD, INDIRECTLY SERVED BY EAST VALLEY FREEWAY,. . b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? NO c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? . 5 PROVIDED - NONE ELIMINATED d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so. generally describe (indicate whether public or private). . NO - 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail, or • air transportation? If so, generally describe. • NO f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. • ± 15 VEHICLE TRIPS/DAY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: NONE REQUIRED 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care. schools, other)? If so, generally describe. - NO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. • if any. NONE REQUIRED 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: OMIM natural gas, Win+ e use sery ce e ephone an ary sew Sseptic sys em, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,:, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. UTILITIES TO REMAIN THE SAME C. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency- may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willf misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. if ////- Proponent: i 44 ' rAf dName Printed: a /NEW�i%�l._ • • • - 10 - #176 11-8-84 ENDING OF FILE FILE TITLE SA . 046 .- 66 Stilt d