Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA86-079 George A. Hormel & Company George A. Hormel & Company P.O. Box 800 P.O. Box 800 Austin, MN. 55912 Austin, MN. 55912 George A. Hormel & Company George A. Hormel & Comapny P.O.Box 800 P.O. Box 800 Austin, MN. 55912 Austin, MN. 55912 George A Hormenl & Company George A. Hormel & Company P.O. Box 800 P.O. Box 800 Austin, MN. 55912 Austin, MN. 55912 KOERING,HOLVICK,& DEREGT KOERING, HOLVICK & DEREGT 1230 0akmead Park Way Suite 1230 0akmead Park Way Suite Sunnyvale, CA. 94088 Sunnyvale, CA. 94088 KOERING, HOLVICK & DEREGT KOERING, HOLVICK & DEREGT 1230 0akmead Park Way Suite 1230 0akmead Park Way Suite Sunnyvale, CA. 94088 Sunnyvale, CA. 94088 KOERING, HOLVICK & DEREGT KOERING, HOLVICK & DEREGT 1230 0akmead Park Way Suite 1230 0akmead Park Way Suite Sunnyvale, CA. 94088 Sunnyvale, CA. 94088 , ......___ • 3 . -----------------------,=:- . ........................„ d. L. . /. . .- .. . .. • * . • ... • . . • . -.. .. . . . . . • , . . . . .. . , .. • _ . . • . • . , . . . . . . . ,.. . . . . .. . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . , , • . . . •. . . . . .., .. . . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . • ... , • . • . . . .... • . • • • . .......4.:,. . . ..fr"..4...„ . . • . . . . . ,. . . . . • . . . . . • . . • • . . . .. . . . . . 1.,/,.. „....../.. .. ....it. 1 . • • . 1/./Ak././..:,„..,,./......„.. . ..„ - .TT , . /). .. • /,:. /./. • ,.////, . . . y pAIZKI N!a ' ' - 1.- -• $.VY. ?-" ST. - I 1 l 4&'i tom. • iiii- _ ; -�/IGI N 17Y f ��N • INFFoRMATIO M FEZ-EWE-7 FROM Ki=oi,t_ IAAr Go:I No, 327 W- IzEliTON taellI cti.l;Et2:t2b - • - . • ------ . it.!, r:-.4:4,! '!..• "•7 1!.'. 1.3 . 1‘! 1_Pl. oh' 0 1 JUL 281986 i•ti'----- 0 _ _ -..--— ____._______..___—_______,,....),_____,._,_- ,.,-...._„...•-• ...--.„-: ..,....:.-___-_,. ._•,....•,,._-__-_,..-....,-----,--..---,--- ,•-:.• -1.,,_,----_.,---_-...,....-_ -_,-.....-...e,..,..•s,,,-z,_:.__'':11--- -;.,.--''.E.A-f•-•..1F-„,,,---_,...t-T4_:&"- S-li,:•kz.?fr.,•mc',•-•. --;#-.'4-k.,_:-•;r..,-•"...,;-e.•-,-...,:i;_. • • f.-----.-----------. :0.;...,•4, -- . . . - - . , ---. •• PLANTING LEGEtdD .„ - ,*-- . . •. ,,.•..a,r.‘.a.,_.. s••;I14;•,,,...),..-N0_.a..1.1.,. 1 • T . /,/Ai4/' A.r•„07" 1.-1#.:.,-.,r.,e• p0 2i,.ctr,.:ItlIilll O • c01.r,=zc2•=-,1:)0•.,3 rz.meat:...••:`,1,.W=-.2c...0,x...••..,W...,.-.....=.,/...IS:.I--_cK...i.—e-cTtE,.f.M1e.--a,VZ.".,A.,7r,.A''7.M.-i..A,,a .(..,N-C:.,.r4..,I.1,,.-G.S.4.f7,1.,1 0:•1,7 5,.1514.01)...,....0F•L.E.W.4.)) A S.....o) - G \ .. 'kNO-4qF, I1i tX, s i_ - I 4000"" ' , , ......i•of .. IMO li • V V . 1,12421' 7 ' . 1 TO•410/7 ' 1 g 1Z7 • Zt ‘ I. 1 fj • N' ..A , — -. . • I . • • ,iii, 41i, . .. • . /. ..._---,. .7 i• , , ..... . • . .. 410 r 6, . . , ..:„, i 1 i _ •---- / .f,. 1 / • . —_ - . ... ) _----- )41 I. ...------ r___--i A, --,..„.... OM • -- tee i 1 -.-- • L___- --------- *_____------- 1 j i ,, iti,vz" N 1 ,21 .. jod:.:01% 1 I AO i VICINITY MAP vr i a - 41.: . (----- _ I Wks Imo oaf) I • -f,,• 11:111 40 (c1.0 I p C 441 • II k (-Q tik .Q-) ( 141) I i .,• LEGAL DESCRIPTION !,,,F: r. 1---- 0400 I 0100,110211 la•NM 111 0 0.//00 1201, . 01 • 5, .0 - ilj GmagGr6P.1.0011040 .50011 61••00//0,0 001 YE 010 0..r0te 00 0 . 1 i I! II iti . V MON 0/0 00 5.1.8 0111010,04 0.10000 11.0 .. •1 11 000,0 0 0011.00 1111110,9 M.A“110.0 0500 i _ .,,,,, , ,,,, ,..0. ,,,,,, . Wt.., . W•da' 0.. 20. , add . wo o.e, i ma 0010 0 01,FiCaril.0110.TO/0 00 NU...0 , §41 _ IMF 000 0000-01 0 400.010.10,10,0 1.0.ON _J --, ‘..—. 4.--. . ..., WI 10 110.1,0.0..0 3 MeV EOM 0 OM•••11111•1•0 MI 1•0110: • ill SI r . .0000 S.m,Woe 001 0000,000.0.8,0 IS ' ' ,001•100.010 101101.001 T0:15000 0:01.i00 --I PC.WNW•0 WM.IC 11.0 000/0 401 1.0 MB 0 0- gi• LITil '. 4111 ._._____, 00/la.d010 00 GS•01.•0310 0 1100 10:0001, , i li 1 J a 0 07.110 0100.000.100 IMMNIN001Ir/IS 111111 —1...I,- O 10 0 001 t . 4/0 . ; ,.-_, .—a awn pun v..e=or mom Paw Inge••am sont •riS F i 1 4P2/11 IV tt , ✓am e.==man=man 6 r-.. .,--- 6.I.0105E L PM 041.0 4000 00.0at. 1 AA1 go fi . ., . Pl.45211.0.•01 1 NOV lair I-- 00.O.PeD•grf 4— ._ 1.4 fIt ALVA - • - 4-1 1 • NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED A ,Ik •i 1,1g) 1 PROJECT 1' 1141, ._41 ,_ , , , ctrobvpw:1 y.17-_-einitAA - ..-,.......0 2.,.."G>...,..,g•tr•V....RI....0./........,• • . lo hp [ p, ,,1 [._,1 I ...kr le.,at /7.1. ' ..cc ar2.. ....KGP...11 AYOS-..•mo'Go..-.....,a..T.GT GGT*O.GP si •tt. ! i 4 ,7 INF hi • .,,,, , le. . ,..,, ..et C-g.OK,*CZ...al..1•010.•l'...VG 600 1 L.--,,,,.....-cco. , , I '- i )' e K.,. if agi 1C 0 - . . M W ti . , 1 i . .1 t , SITE STATISTICS . . , . .1.1.-ra.1 .1. .1.1.1.1.1.1. _ .,—, • .rir.g.1*2.1,1ACCS I I 1 i 7 tli.' . fitic,aira, tacso44 ca.::-.•,. as 1,8.(..I s.....21....1 - ' I= LU '1 .."Vala...I.g>• 1..",I m : ' .J „.,. • • ti a, ...9 t• , - --— - GPM•ILLI• w• 1 W iLi2 .-- -- way(....groando c3.17ft , 0. . C w".c. . • •• _ • '* 8 ', • •—•. LANDSCAPE PLAN STE PLAN ..1 ..... 5( i ....... 3 • ,.. . _ • . • . , t ,1- . • , .. • • , • • . . • , . . • • . . Ak Jr Ke .`� �� o BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -0 �� • z. 200 Mill Avenue South 09 Renton, Washington 98055 o94,. SEPZEMOP 1 rnadt--Q". ‘h....5 , .b9_/ 13 •.a+..(nc of;m7Ewa fc (,vD �\&W • � ""-;N{;;' y{� 16 1 +� « e/ P/ ^�..,4 4 IB ••.,L•, NOR E .sss esa I�r'41e •e. w ��PrY tio, RN, 0 �'B Q F O 3fre 11° •��"K..t I t. r• ? /r J oGye 1t ST i• 11a i W3 3sf.7 //yI�. /Ycf ��. aid • �• er Y 1 { / /AO. b er f • • '• yeµ 2 410 1 i Ifyti� to L •lµ• .µ cSZ/A / / II CD 't • �ti{ {� '• I 1M•t � De ;/ / ih} It f ® 1 Z • ® t� / 1 roil_- 4.1t 25'a, Se,.f7 . 1�- • I a n .e-u• [.e7.1e2 f -, -.10� t�.4 L!!—1 i :71.0 j ..•L7(ADP �.�„ OIf•.I-NI fa{ �1 (� S.. .✓f 2I-a'- ' • dN-r�-Iv� KI.t7 • ` N../w 1 V S.W.t324.7 H ST s S 144TH sT c«.t7„ ......�.,...�,e. r, r S.W. 7TH ST. (s..VI7N sr) ♦•'1, .4T11 s w --Ar 7 TH. . • S T: u� , 2 f j,,a'' seuu/ies =v ! 2 0- d �rpa/ 2ze.ei ..so !o ,Aso-of i I a w I 30 Jo I f` /D 1/ t rs ..r Ir</\1 e w I t 1.,-ti 7 . . ____---- I .J, I T /ii 1. .1.,,;.. 4 *: e W b 9 3. a yF, • MFe ��$ wok ,• Q \ Zw { /!S„. +c}� w Doe y�''ke+c v 4 a 1; 0 .7 it 1.13 U4 Q, ^ru Illla Q •a a S Z fe O' Z q * a '0 I .P•I 3 I,e°o/s I m �.i I i b • a 1; . e, in, qtsr 91 Y 91 338./L•04L J % !{I t V 3 fr z.7 rs v n se`3 �. .,,.., N Q-of 0 ,moo• W .., p-/I- 7I e. , I I 3 �' 4v r 1 J,i. '4A C r—__— e • PLANTING LEGEND C - \.— ,-�. ar:.Z�sV=-Ee"7.1e(a'-Zt L.MC A .6 A suave)) , N. J� NM, Qd� Ar b) /• j (4 ... \ I!vBTGEG N ceWF2Q S'-7HfiLnYK 9KN ( l Ji 1i e •n ,(� ....a.SC Y.(�lo°9V Nf b'f)xb'4•GGyLPrW) 1 W S Awssarss F 88 ["`:) .,e�-+s+e-9e6¢'-u•r.<r4c srctii \'\ \ 1 �- ' s ::::!1:-:' . iii. k ....4nal?........1.4%ttorf44:Fe M el )11(.. ,"<, \\ \ sulti ,/," \. [� (werye...+emr1 ��"s/ 6� .pep i'i4wacIM') \\\ '� �irNi IIIIr7 • $ Fwo Al . , ,,/ kas, • • • 411 a0 LJ _III /•,•••• - !t,ilmi gj /qA4 kr , VICINITY MAP a k ..igo _ (HIP 1 g C' 0.j LEGAL DESCRIPTION,®R..M. .. a. u \ I :; t ` t v 8 NM MO.IN WO MEMO AN A OMANN CT M TA MT TO TON IONAMT MO- ® ®pm w..m..s 1 El � w.+ I 'l _-mo �¢.24 co• , a.o , v..d- cc aw- m,,.• i :Y ... - is€ , t3ti - s TAM I AM.Mt MOM On.114•Nr•OMB MT TO On IINT.IMMO 01 St. a a lg.g o- An 4 IFIO . iiii TM NMI M MINOR .- 4411 I:1 I — . 1. ( ' 1 kJ.OMMIL IM MMTM MAMMA l/MViLOM 1 iiiiii . 1 11 ---1 , It �8i r -- NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED t / I gj i. o- __.... PROJECT Is/ e;I` 1,g7� ! �_ — - amrw+avnaaz.1y� aws�6 e+R.c.:..cw%, $. oO.b_A_:AO ` te`s1►.V a.Ca - - l _ ipw w..w i:s..0 is...,a+nncr �nm a-r w+.vsw�usc unu. if ."� 'y Z .V£I4.4 wllf. R[M 9luly S H TIM S. 16. 443e2 4 .I i C ' I r a L a "4444.47 I ..�1 si Vie,n*re..,s.cew.iw+r.mvrm.w..eu,m 3'zce- D- rw®SRE STATISTICS • _ CL oumm.q_Rua: we w.,u(uo sm.ac.ua..ar) '� II t) -- ,- �_ Ic I fi`y°.c c I c c I c Ic' oMll W a Feane;e¢v w�N.: u,sHs. O'� 0pO�vA,;O '.tt� -. �.�i 1 i1yd r W .revue A.•.a.0• 'e,e+oer - . 1 " C - Z Er — — —J �— — ` — �- - - Q IA W Lu N ^ w LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE PLAN 'F-1, I+ 1 PLANTING LEGEND /+ f s ar -sF're cz'•z%i(x;::.ws x:454+) I,.4 . `'✓i Er.16,2�19(cWFe2(5'-",r4AV..t I551gN% ii• / .,'.,,Z. • '.I..s','....v( ....\...„.\.../'-• °C d 1•ew.,. .> •ri ;ice Y \• - - - ) ..r ,(� ..w:e sWn t4•-9vwr.62nc•e02.Z.....) / d - , .^^�. re:nvx4(w'-u•=r.a'-c'ci slrc.c) . :; \ u• : -uµnv+Kl+t+'nen0wr4,4:PR1 /� \\\\ _ r - g� won Maw �\>\ ;Hp ir., sop I.A$1.24 -. ,r4-- ,.. _ 0 .. N..... . , .. . . . 1 0„ . 1, . • , , . i . • • :al . , i - 0. . . I z• . 1 _______ ....____ f, ,,,- / . . . ,. . • . /I 4 i� VICINITY MAP ti low _ Won inc. al,a �� W I , LEGAL DESCRIPTION a -il . 11 I F I 1iiiii . lig;. ',!Ala k v; • vM-V.a u•o.••.......M 1 t8. _ 1 ill - ( ill _ q g : 43 o+n aV el al • - 1 . ; '`Va i ail . . lail , _ , L'''"- I Its" di .2. NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED - l' g $ PROJECT . • I; . _ %gl �:. - its) r 1 y I. I �� Lazo n♦w rmmlxsys ,n+s:-rs amor>rc pus, oO.bA:AA^ ae'A►.Yird.0 2 - Iati 2 • Qiui/n,••wJ.1� LP so sae...'SCJ✓+:'�w.{1♦ •�; �•�. -) i grgP vil . M Wnf(P•/caws.W21w5 Ysmr,rM2•M.S.On!44TP ]``CJ ��'1 $g 0J S. • ▪ aenwm. IYI.E v[cr,5 2w Su T K 1NC S,rG¢wpa w 1r_ rlU1� I 8,�. •\J • 1 (L Msw. • ) r- v d `tis< K a , �,'4: N� Z ;. ,n �9 8i • a l �o SITE STATISTICS , . t I , I C - i�� . . I i W a Z S:t ILG.* •19'IG SP 1.19 KR3 , y -�f { 1 _ el ~ LLf, N • :,,.,s: �......('.v .e ) .n.J ma ! _ P ow'euar ` y! lit CO > 3 in • 9�..: PIMA.. o-_-ipooO�wo;,0,' pO:i► .._. . , ..-.... .�Aai • s irr� ¢ wA♦ «,• 85;4_p � �� '. ' J 1 1 x '�' e _ I��1, w p♦vso ta5.: K,vn=F - _- A__� _ -- � - �� ( uuK. —_ _- Kb•u'' �_PK,.sm..,-- - __ A - IW O 2 moo___. Im < W c J 131 W - - ;i c w LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE PLAN • � �I - 1 r r--- PLANTING LEGEND • m., 4..E .--*f� . :,^a�13sa. 1il °"`� • \�� -r srz�s rhF Cr•op -.z'arw.:a�c.e x c.a�+) I:.. y�,..�'j • ' :'e a mm.± tvr..'w'�i�1 1�I •� 1Y ' J WPY¢EeN tayfeG S' 6r.ex Y.594Ni • J4u6" "93 I9f-9Vuf 64Kfid'G4 J8+N'i - ii ,5*( ' II _7.43 V ,e'' §11 • .. SWI. \ - I n]]•— -"'men ccvicR,A(.may»'°ffip)mvY. : \� .' .1 131 .4/ ' \ / • .: ]o`m v i 7a+Eo1 'WO I I �� 41018 - � $ _____________-.------- 14‘°- i A vi - i. D ‘.....6..... till ."•:...." _ _ - , . . ....„. 4tt) '1,,S . , -- _, , (._--_-----,. ., s• >. .- omW.'.w.,'o'''M.w,..d.oWY..r”Te.S 4a 0,.a DWLs'.a.na O.'ma."KTla".W.evl'l."Nie Was..0 srOa.l Fe a..W•.1-2 41.1M0O1.,O1 O0•Wf SOrnSet e rVadTS aa vs''''''a,.Twr,ao:..,..„M„,r,...,,..'.,.,",, ,,,, O fl _- ma T94 s NZII=0 ,.,,x, 1, VICINITY MAP a� a`-+7iQOo _ tSlg� p�_ 1 y„$ 9 $ �$ *, '1 �saLhF'$ It) ( r LEGAL DESCRIPTION o M1f�3I . � w rp _ $ +57 ® _,. lift; AAe15( I p :p Zd m : z twos adrawaa•la da Or 1 WO dal OW LW 0,WO WM ad 41 VW TO i -EC 0 ' '4 IR I 1 .A. ;L i I 1 ligi .,,1 --1 ikill P 16111 ig • al.WV.no 1•14•Sen OBEAC•Tana fill _ hem NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED -- t k 1i$t giii i: PROJECT 1� 1110 8 ;ou.ros:eo; y 1da.l.deU e ( i z c ws v>.Evw u..,,, ve.w,-.:.M, - :a..�e $ ,7 Cb'p �$, _ �1. l.I,,m- ¢ems �r 02 A-wa.�sw�.z.- Iski , 8i Ya . J _ ' fl �TATISTIC .IL SR 214 TWOSALS• 0:140OPO�vV;OI1111F ,,,,,,re. F Mevanaa+nw , -a ' Tga f `° j 1. to cw:v mw c.,�map a -. a --A I b•m'�eY u-. m a Laa LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE PLAN • 1 v" • . . .. . . : fE • - . Ito . . -, • 1;hi,-—,i i,,,n). i .IIILI i , .. • .ram — ti / 6 ide• I81 1. ;• ,•duo' \ i i� /i • - • rmz w, el • r+ IS v , • • -,i. 1 , . -_„ tak ---.Ilk!, . : .J... , - g` - i fi. . • - - . •J .1 / ir ..,.... • • � C r .0 1Mn • • ` ,a In, - 107 • a I • VICINITY MAP w 4' - y p' .dI m • f• (i?r .i!Tl• ie ii'6Z foal��g2, it) g 3 : • LEGAL DESCRIPTION a I ` ► • �. �' !.ti a 1.; tH m.....� am. o _ AN! 421o.• f`E':�m' I .�.,p Qo 4 _ I. # � eAMIMAS AT na MP AMP Or AM . ze-j� _-;�=— "'�9 _-'fie-'>v - `� .si •nort a.•.....•ran owns cum oven vs n•=mama.•Fria la sus - $+• P -ate i• ' Ii 10. —�1 �— • ! . R o c4. A.A. nay...errs xaaco ,S - ; _ =r. . m`.4 i 1. .NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED • -ilaA�=lt jot q III PROJECT' • . 1�" - ,a�! �,e�� i� g Ili 7.,,.ur.=rx.- «=2,.-m-�s<e:...e.-a—z 'oo.OA:Qo- y e04 d.0��",p ioi• Q S L. - ''� Z • - $ } co a ICI SITE STATISTICS "'444 jl _. w z -. - � ,,...c'. _ 600'6oa. I N fl 00 ,,.I' -- - s • r m -e • • ' 9 �.,.. .:,..-....'• : �� i tl ..,Jr_ ri N o a G • 9. i. • - �_. �r c.�.u.a .,�� ,ray ,it ,v oA w Barghausen • LANDSCAPE PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN • Consulting Engineers Inc. ' ,..I. �� -I lAa Planning,Survey t�ep,..n.a Specialists Cl • ..4 ....,Itib,.11\ 04t gl I . :I.- ,.. 4.1, �4' yoYiy I < � I® . i i . , I ' ! -'''''' -Aft, -- 'ill.' - 'e, g•• 1 'Ir I ' - • $ 0? • -. fi' / , ..., fr.., 1 f, . iiir,,'',. ‘,.:,:die ,,__r_f_ MC I VICINITY MAP L. `8 P 'g�• g!, m„ j , ,I. LEGAL DESCRIPTION • \g I. `►11) 34S I pc''; 1�7.'7e'' •u. :r s o pm 09999•D Isci•I MN Min,® - ; � j��Sr 1 y�) d S 'aof at°�__i_Yd oo aa°I9 _ iQ ,_'xv ''1 '� so LzA1,110.--4106 . FYI 84.E - t t. . r o.r = 8, • Iof i NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED. � t j ` •'� 1 .b PROJECT Li�'I �� a i� - • "° fy $ , . lb _ aues:aa ch...veopiti, ID z I :.,....°i r� .T s.n'< i..ivy -."1, - Tj _' P O'. a �' II $� ° -T. 1�� J e1� f� O �: -mot t W z V l dr _, off r. . . ./ - 1� ° SITE STATISTICS .� ?• 1 I I I I I _I��1��1 , 1 r°J� li .t e �� °I e-I. o.l �;I a .o !� J t � cito-tooazmv € it I F' c \ W a .. In G, . ' .�, n _:v.J C ,_::.vOOo�'`Ov '.::WY�t-,e%!. triik I a k� ¢ o z K i. II • wv wa7 .ad-wwnart — ,c2 ---' 116; • H C w ` -- Barghausen: LANDSCAPE PLAN Land � GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN �� Consulting Engineers Inc. °� . ,a Planning, u,o so..wur. - - e - Cl .m.� • • • r .-1 B 1 a .... ...... ,....,0, 0 ,...... 10,00.10 00 SCPIO.N.00/AX0'="1..T.10109'' . .' . 211,-.1,) 31-3 f '. \ -. '--firliJ., - .-- 110 ' . . 0 • " • *: i/ Off' if�y x',xwr \ •.,mts,+- �R; i, i, ` • 09 d v 7 , •i : • ;• . • , • . „ . 4 iii, , ii P.. . I I s • • • • .... ,,,, qi, -, . . km - .. • L . . IOW e . . . • VICINITY MAP L.. tii :o - I4{ Q� mw _ g • + _ t • LEGAL DESCRIPTION o \_�4SI �Ibfr �1g: :.:.'- °o 3 a ,, ®ALCM WS N.M.,PredlT[01 a M. . .. •ii • \$ - ,tofr it; �= i $ • � dam= _ 'lte�► Ita' It. �, -�- a , • •.. ..._ ..: ems' - +,8 i= -• $b Ili' n_ I. m vjpi• • }� �� . •t oral _ r. NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED . J�=` f H` o �( __i �j • • PROJECT . I 1�� T.�'� � �� •i C .l - :�.�� --xn • 8 a ousg:eo; y ed�o4a.00;�, a2 s J® z o e i ° `.0 i wO 3 l z SITE STATISTICS •• • • __ 8 co a O • "" owe ',; CO W 3 .P .y: • C•I..ö! ' a��00arq^:u .,, �� a - w► , w w w �K w a ,� u�LL� .R,.. — tl :� i • I' 5 1 i;•, 1... Z .....;, ;.w-- �. �. Ja o . Berghaus¢n LANDSCAPE PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1r Consulting Engineers Inc. „� Land�m.mg ... I"'co sp«wu.i. . ,•G WS 0. .a....w . B i; C-I BEGINNINÔ OF FILE FILE TITLE 9,(r._!:44, Lr *, tV. 019 - 3 . MICROFILMED !/, 7.) 1 1 .1 • O : 1 k) EEU To sTfE Tc- sS E acF E xTs c Pfl e, t Xt. AC A; • clorui,J)Op IC) coy ) S1UOY • • N^ A OD--4 O'O 91 0<(0 m b 1?I 7m o vd3 31z 7,_ mW '3'ij la ?r�inm A W 13 •-0 6j Cr,. 0 p' cwN..'�co8 -‹F'e, Fmmx C' m m o zg_m' w = 8o m42 � pm<m< -- AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION .» 3 z m O8mamc= nma»?z0OO Z o. 5Cm o n°, from c' AO?-Zo 01 Audrey De Jo i e , being first duly sworn on oath states that di _a o 0 0- z 4 z -4 o-4 o he/she is the Chief Clerk of the 3 mst m a T O•j 0 o z i n°i T�a?v° cm m�° 3Z VALLEY NEWSPAPERS F y Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News 0.-- 1o•m 13 cnCoe, oa -{cs7 Dm Fn w mi 3-54 Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspaper --° $ ° o 0 3:a m a CO, a ro are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than sit m w=iD 'a N,'''.D CD„ m °.<o_o a v- a) Cj gm < = >c pcn, a = c =a.. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and publishes o N O' a o a° o»m; p c� ° a N w.° * a Q • � ° »= 81° in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, Kin; g c 3 3 c ° 3 ° O CO °, Fo m a° 3 w n County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as lega o w w N 3 0 ,A: D3 v 2 ' g*g 0 0 - 010 0 newspapers order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington fo o—a 33 w§. m - ?o Lo 5 r) 4) 3 O .-« by P King County. f.F,27< < 0?o° w m ° ° c m co fQ CD a)2 o es °.= o rn °'o o o g w = cn<'� w The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily New ° ° m �, O m•Q,< ° s�, ��, w Journal Daily Record Chronicle_ Daily Globe News (an 5.2 " =3,?_cp c)s co •m ° »m ° '� , f , g.0 g ?ro x f 9...92 .N-.m a q O° 9 0 0 0 not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to it 5' subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice > z m*v N 0 cn--° i(O -0. �0V G 'T10 Cl. r ) DC7n00� a- .. was publish& , Qm2_4i'' ?La3a g aAg 22Fa ° 30 Q Or roN .1n 3 E ro a� w a ° m-3- g_ 0 7 on i, u t �j� 86 '.�_7 Fn1mo0° Fr_. aim wca.0w 4."FA °—' C _ E. 0, co I mO m uc, we 3 ��m� yAQ�D �c 0 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the to< N w co= >0(0 f.a p,.m . 0 sum of $i� �o� '-> 61,< f m o S.m v o . w s= io ?� 3 ,-4. �poa coal z -4 a vaco m5� //qq n FD f.?2.5 Q C)� a Ti 7,0'= 0)D m.y Cy 83g.< a ° m m p, to ° m ag7 n' 7`° ° 6g.-3v to 0 a, a / ; 7.,,,0"--2----c ''' p-,,-o al 6. 333 9. 2. ,c,) P K=.'" 3 tmjlit ° D UI.amo Subscribed and sworn to before me this '9th day of Aug19 86 . "; .,-_2,i-ez_ d----c, No ary Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VN 087 Revised 10/84 " 3253Z r L. L-L. V1"Q' NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: Site Plan Approval - SA-079-86 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a parking lot containing 184 stalls on a 2.24 acres site to support an office building complex within 500 feet (500' ) GENERAL LOCATION: Located on the north side of S.W. 7th Street at the 700 Block. PUBLIC APPROVALS: Site Plan Approval Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, ' --£gr the State of Washington '‘,OR. .fl residing in REM .•i-. 414i: .<<G , on the L,/TNday ok •;• .- 74 c r' . a SIGNED: 4., o �' �< .. 8, 1g.:'`o-,f' WASN.,NG�,i OCTS -Z767)-- ,.456 IF OF RR, 3 1986 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS BUILDINGi4:C;NING DEPT. WHEREAS, Eugene Horbach dba E&H Properties ("Owner") is the owner of the real property described in Exhibit A ("Property") which is located in Renton, King County, Washington and commonly known as the IBM and Collins Buildings ("Office Buildings") . WHEREAS, Owner is also the owner of the real property described in Exhibit B ("Parking Property") . WHEREAS, The City of Renton ("City") has approved the Parking Property as subsitute parking for the Property. However, the existing parking ("Existing Parking") which serves the Property is sufficient to satisfy the City' s Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements. WHEREAS, the Owner of the Parking Property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land and to use, present and future, of the Parking Property. However, the following restrictive convenants shall be effective only if the Parking Property is developed as a parking lot. NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner hereby establishs, grants and imposes restrictions and covenants running with the Parking Property with respect to the use by the Owner and his successors, heirs, and assigns as follows, effective only if the Parking Property is developed as a parking lot: 1. If the Parking Property is developed as a parking lot, the parking lot will serve only the Office Buildings in accordance with the requirements of the City Municipal Code. 2 . If the Parking Property is developed as a parking lot to serve the Office Buildings, such use shall not be terminated unless an equal amount of better replacement parking is provided for the Office Buildings in compliance with the City' s Parking and Loading Ordinance. "Better replacment parking" shall mean parking which is closer to the Office Buildings than the Parking Property and parking which is more convenient to the tenants of the Office Buildings. 3 . If any additional buildings are constructed upon the Property, sufficient parking shall be provided on the Property (or the Parking Property if it has been developed as a parking lot to serve the Office Build .-= - . to satisfy the City's COpy CIRIa N F LEA RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS EUGENE HORBACH DOT 2 1986 86 ID , oo? /OW actor of Rec &Electionsord s Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements for the existing Office Buildings and the additional buildings, unless the Parking Property has been developed as a parking lot to serve the Office Buildings and Owner has acquired better replacement parking to substitute for that previously developed upon the Parking Property, as mentioned above. In that event, such better replacement parking shall be in an amount sufficient to satisfy the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance. 4 . Notwithstanding any other provision of this document, this document shall only be effective if the Owner develops the Parking Property as a parking lot. If the Owner later chooses not to develop the Parking Property as a parking lot, the Parking Property may be used for any purpose which is permitted by applicable City laws. In such event, Owner shall terminate this document by filing a termination of this document in the public records of King County, Washington. 5. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by the City or any property owner adjoining the Parking Property who is adversely affected by such a violation or breach. (Owner) Euge a orbach dba EI Properties -2- RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS EUGENE HORBACH 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this , day of October, 1986, before me personally appeared Eugene Horbach dba E&H Properties, known to me, and he acknowledged that he signed the foregoing document as his free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WITNESS my hand and official seal the:.lay-a • ,,-ar in this certificate above written. / ,��' - � PM 1 AtiA, IB j O NO ARY PUBLIC in a d for Q N: Washington, residing at ?; _ %` �.• f e rs My commission expires A:F ' vro di • -3- RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS EUGENE HORBACH EXHIBIT A That portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point south 89°10' 25" east 753 . 32 feet and north 1°13 ' 10" east 40.00 feet from the southwest corner of said Section 18; thence north 1°13 ' 10" east 44.22; thence northeasterly on a curve to the right having a radius of 304. 62 feet to a point 40 feet west of the east line of said subdivision; thence south 1°40 ' 55" west, to a point which bears south 89°10 '25" east from the point of beginning; thence north 89°10' 25" west to the point of beginning. PARCEL A: That portion of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter, being a portion of Government Lots 13 and 14 in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. AND of Tracts 8 and 9, 2nd Supplemental Map of Renton Shorelands, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Section 18; thence south 89°10'25" east 1098. 32 feet; thence north 01°40' 53" east 40. 00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north 01°40' 53" east 347. 49 feet; thence southeasterly 472 . 81 feet on a curve to the right having a radius of 301.00 feet, the center of said curve being on the last described line; thence south 01°40' 53" west 42 .00 feet; thence north 89°10'25" west 301.03 feet to the true point of beginning. PARCEL B: That portion of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter being a portion of Government Lots 13 and 14 in Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. AND of Tracts 8 and 9 of 2nd Supplemental Map of Renton Shorelands in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the south quarter corner of said Section 18; thence westerly along the south line of said Section 18 a distance of 970.00 feet; thence north 1°40'53" east 108.24 feet to the intersection of a curve whose radial point bears south 87°03 ' 33" west 331.00 feet, said point being the true point of beginning; thence along said curve to the left a distance of 347 feet, more or less, to the intersection with the southerly line of the Pacific Coast Railroad Co. right-of-way; thence easterly along said right-of-way line 143 .5 feet, more or less, to a point 325.00 feet, as measured along said right-of-way line from the west line of said Government Lot 14; thence south 1°40' 53" west parallel with the west line of Government Lot 14 a distance of 130. 99 feet to the southerly line of said Tract 9 of 2nd Supplemental Map of Renton Shorelands; thence north 66°48'33" east along said southerly line 49.59 feet to a point which bears north 1°40'53" east 167. 47 feet from the true point of beginning; thence south 1°40' 53" east 167.47 feet to the .true point of beginning. .P EXHIBIT B That portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 18 Township 23 North and Range 5 East W.M. in King County, Washington described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 18 , thence South 89° 10"18 ' East along the South line of said Section 18 a distance of 275.74 feet to the Southerly projection of the West line of a Parcel deeded to Geroge A. Hormel & Company by deed recorded under King County Recording No. 7305240389, thence North 00°49"42 ' East along said Southerly projection 40. 00 feet to the Southwest corner of said Parcel and the True Point of Beginning said point being on the North margin Southwest 7th Street, thence continuing North 00°49"42 ' East along the West line of said Parcel 464 .54 feet to a point on a 363 . 06 foot radius curve concave to the Southeast a radial at said point bearing South 15°37"21 ' East, thence Southwesterly along said curve an arc distance 340.46 feet, thence South 01°14"35 ' West 151. 88 feet to said North margin of Southwest 7th Street, thence South 89° 10"18 ' East along said North margin 259 . 60 feet to the True Point of Beginning. As shown in Short Plat 37-77, City of Renton, recorded March 24, 1977 under Recording No. 7703240654 . OF R�� 0 ® °z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR MA g 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09,4,_ SEP1,vg§' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR DATE: SEPTEMBER 17, 1986 . TO: MAXINE MOTOR, CITY CLERK 3 FROM: ROGER J. BLAYLOCK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT• CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS (SA-079-86) I The attached yellow file is being transmitted to the City Clerk for permanent records. The Site Plan Review Committee on Wednesday, August/ 20, 1986, approved with conditions the site plan for Curtis Beattie and Associates Architects. The Committee report was formally issued on August 27 , 1986. The appeal period expired on Wednesday, September 10, . 1986, without an appeal being submitted. RJB:jg „SEP i l i b.. FlUITY CLERICS OFFICE 1 I I 3079Z AUGUST 27, 1986 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Curtis Beattie and Associates Architects (E&H Properties) SA-079-86 (S.W. 7th Street Replacement Parking) LOCATION: 700 S.W. 7th Street (immediately west of the Hormel building) SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a replacement parking lot containing 184 parking spaces on a 2.24 acre parcel . SUMMARY OF ACTION: Approval with conditions. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 11 :15 a.m. on Wednesday, August 20, 1986 in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comments from all. divisions of the Public Works Department, both divisions of the Building and Zoning Department, and the Fire, Police, Parks and Policy Development Departments. The following exhibits are entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting of publication, and other documentation / pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site/landscape plan (dated June 24, 1986). Exhibit No. 3 Revised site/landscape plan (dated August 18, 1986). Exhibit No. 4 Revised grading and drainage plan/landscape- plan (dated August 15, 1986). Exhibit No. 5 Letter of clarification from Eugene Horbach (dated August 18, 1986). Exhibit No. 6 Letter from Scott A. Douglas and Curtis Beattie and Associates Architects addressing technical details (dated August 15, 1986). Exhibit No. 7 Letter from Eugene Horbach amending application (dated August 22, 1986). FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1 . The applicant, Curtis Beattie and Associates Architects for E&H Properties has requested site plan approval to allow the construction of a 184 stall parking lot on 2.24 acres of property. 2. The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1 . SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE/REVIEW AND DECISION CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/FILE SA-079-86 AUGUST 27, 1986 PAGE 2 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21C 1971 as amended), a Mitigated Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, the responsible official. The mitigated declaration of non-significance was based upon the amended plans, Exhibit No. 3 and No. 4 and the letter dated August 22, 1986 amending the application to address the concerns of the Environmental Review Committee. 4. The plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of the proposal . The Building and Zoning Department issued a declaration that the proposal complies with the intent of the Parking and Loading Ordinance pursuant to Section 4-2204(3)(C) (2) for location. 5. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option for the subject site and the existing M-P, Manufacturing Park, zoning. 6. The site plan as presented complies with the 'specific dimensional limitations of the Parking and Loading Ordinance and the minimum amount of landscaping as recommended under the Comprehensive Plan designation. 7. The proposal will provide the necessary required parking for the IBM/Collins Office Park complex. A total of 551 parking spaces arerequired for the office complex by the City code. This proposal will supplement the existing 368 on-site parking spaces with 184 parking spaces thereby providing 552 parking spaces pursuant to City codes. Conclusions: 1 . The proposal is 'a development ' consistent with the policies, specifications and codes of the City of Renton. 2. Specific design issues raised by various City departments focused on: a. On-site circulation, drainage and lighting. b. Overabundance of parking for the demand of the IBM/Collins Office complex. c. The elimination of the temporary' parking lot located on the south side of S.W. 7th Street. ' This application has been determined to be 'a replacement parking lot for the temporary lot existing on the south side of S.W. 7th Street and is required in the public interest to support the City's 'ordinance requirements for parking for the. IBM/Collins Office complex. The office park complex does not presently meet code for parking without the established temporary parking lot on the southwest side of S.W. 7th Street. The uses in the buildings/office park would require 551 stalls for parking. The buildings contain 368 on-site spaces. The complex, therefore, lacks 183 spaces for code compliance for parking 'spaces. This approval would permit the development of the 184 parking spaces which would be sufficient to bring ' the ' buildings into compliance with the City 's codes and ordinance. 3. The Site Plan Committee was concerned that the applicant's proposal present the possibility and probable intent to expand the parking lot on this 2.24 acre parcel to provide 30% more additional parking than proposed, thereby providing parking spaces above that required by City code. Intensification of parking may lead to intensification of traffic impacts in the area which have not been considered under this application since the application is based upon the principle of "replacement" parking. Expansion of this parking lot would be considered a separate application and be reviewed under future environmental concerns including a subarea transporation study and a Metro transporation management plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE/REVIEW AND DECISION CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/FILE SA-079-86 AUGUST 27, 1986 PAGE 3 4. The applicant has agreed with the Environmental Review Committee and Site Plan Review Committee that the proposal should only be implemented upon the completion of a transporation management plan for the IBM/Collins Office Park complex satisfactory to Metro. 5. In addition, the property should be very clearly limited by restrictive covenants to assure that any future owner realizes that this site is already reserved for parking for the IBM/Collins Office complex. Changes in building use at the IBM/Collins Office complex and/or the availability of other parking for the complex may release the underlying restrictive covenant if determined through the public review process at the time of requested modifications that Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements for the office complex are being met. 6. The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option and the present zoning classification of M-P, Manufacturing Park. Decision: The site plan, file SA-079-86 for Curtis Beattie and Associates Architects for E&H Properties, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1 . Redesign per Exhibits No. 3 and No. 4. 2. Execution of the modified application per letter dated August 22, 1986 to include: a. The temporary parking lot existing on the south side of S.W. 7th Street will be removed from operation on the day after certification of occupancy is granted by the Building and Zoning Department by placing a steel guard rail across all entrances. b. Any change in the design for the 184 parking spaces is beyond the present needs of the IBM/Collins Office complex and, therefore, would require a new land use decision along with environmental review. c. The preparation of a transporation management plan for the IBM/Collins Office complex to the satisfaction of Metro prior to the occupancy of the parking lot. d. The filing of restrictive covenants to run with the land just prior to the issuance of the building permit for the parking lot to includethe following: 1 . This parking lot is required to serve the present parking needs per City of Renton Municipal Code for the IBM/Collins Office complex. 2. The parking lot may not be convered to any other use unless an equal amount of superiorly located replacement parking is provided for this office park such that the office park is in compliance with the City 's Parking and Loading Ordinance at the time the replacement parking is proposed. (This is specifically to mean that the location of the parking must be closer than the proposed parking lot and also be more convenient to the tenants of the IBM/Collins Office Park. 3. Should any additional structures be built on the subject site, sufficient parking shall be provided to satisfy the City of Renton's Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements for both the on-site structures and the IBM/Collins Office Park, unless the property owner of the IBM/Collins Office complex has acquired adequate legal parking per item above. . P ' SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE/REVIEW AND DECISION CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS/FILE SA-079-86 AUGUST 27, 1986 PAGE 4 For the purpose of this decision, the term "should" and "shall " are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. ORDERED THIS 27th day of August, 1986 Nancy L well Morris, ssociate Planner For the Site Plan Review Committee TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of August, 1986 to the parties of record: Mr. Scott A. Douglas Mr. Eugene Horbach Curtis Beattie & Associates E & H Properties 100 West Harrison Place Suite 220 P.O. Box 598 Seattle, Washington 98119 Bellevue, Washington 98009 TRANSMITTED THIS 26th day of August, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record Chronicle REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before 5 p.m. on Wednesday, September 10, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available prior to the meeting date of August 20, 1986 may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision, which is Wednesday, August 27, 1986. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011 (B)(1 ), which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on Wednesday, September 10, 1986. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal . Decision-makers in the land use process for site plan approvals include: (1 ) the Public Works Director, (2) the Building and Zoning Director, (3) the Policy Development Director, (4) the Hearing Examiner, and (5) members of the City Council . All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial Committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. • ,N•1 ..; . . . ..--- . ;;•-', ___ .... . PLAN11NG LEGEND .0'- 4.,..... .......,„ Ao, -.,"" -..‘ m)-c..*rine—im tr-vera..:too.4 Astwo.4.) ..-.....7....".....„..„,./ ,.. . . , ‘,......i. l'ty, ca-ertig(6'...r,Oie...1}/.5.9.4.1) 2*(7' - ••-• a ., t••-• El II'I',..)II 0 I .rd.l COMMA•••.r.org.4,00 i 1 ,.,et,i-, r P 1*1 ak••• • ,..."11.S.O.PO 010'90,0,0,00,0,0.C...3.0201) ./ ‘,....„. Cf '1 c i / , t• '• 0 al . ' ,..." ,e, . II k 1 .. • `.1 t ; I \ . . 1 ',V....TO i .... 1 SWl. • ) \ .• a r *— •alma;,..c.....kr..aerreomsoatr) • / i i — I • • / ,,, ,,,, 144 E ] .,.....?WITh•24•0‘C4.0.41/ s 'PT, = ir . • , irti 0 r---7: WO 1....1.4 / • , • • ,I s Avila 4 4 11• % ...,l IF f„ rCli. j, Ill POJACfite — 3.CdOcete• 31: i ,.•• # . \ . -., vi._ ' ,--" •- n Pa'''''''.70otto i ' . a . • i 1, -..5 —,1 — 4 -\, IZ, II= 16121 . •• f: P , . , 1 ,.... 4 1 . 1111 1 it I / '''"..• 74 4. 1 Ur1Ai, --.....,.. 1141: ...- L-- -------- , ....... 4„, .,- ,,f-ilki., . : 1 — . 7 ,.. .1_. ,gggg, Me, : 14 ,r, >.' lAyl = lc-o evi, tp. ra' 1 VICINITY MAP i'm 7—= • i V , to 111 (------- __ , , li - II d RI, rex.pl* ---, ( il) ( LEGAL DESCRIPTION iiii 11 g F ,ir ,,,, .3, to •••1 PINCIal 6,.,00.01 N,MIMI la II 0 III.••L••.Le IWO 6•111, ( ' g 0. 191.0•11.•14•1•011M.IF Lail•1511”1.:1112•••te.tr.ACM 11. ii Ljg 1 aiLlk. ...0.................0,./..,,,,,,,,,,,.........y....- , ..C.M.M,.1B MP...I,•1.019..11.0 T•.1•2,•MM.1110 1.1.... f '— !sr ) ittly , ... i ..,..,,..„...,..,„„,„,r,„„,...,,,,,...,....„,.....,.„,..... ' ai.....................sop Roe Nom••Tea moo Now o su op.. ma exonarea•e.••ce a am na.en um..,Gam nes.4 84 MO II I MI ...,......_...,.....„,,.,.,...,„........=...“.. 1 Z fri ! -----t.- it -- Att a 1.PIM 1•••11.•WU.•0.06•SIMMS11 WM=WPM.941t Ina M./IM,MiiliZet . ___I -, IN SC=r•KM KA/1.11.On V'IIMAL=MOON Vs,.NM 0..1.1 iii54 _ $, .0 r mmr.......a.rr....... \A\ V'''. r-e- - 6.160F Iii.•01.0 14=0.11 1112 ril . i _ . A.,MOM Mb/Mai CSALMAIIRS 4421 MCA tralasrl.0 : 't" I —I .•4 rOYOWN' I Id" . r,) e,......,,,..„ .. ..,„ tit "TV 1---- • 'I NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED • — illii 1 Al --,4 PROJECT I' 4h lift , r• — I '. L.• • [ I -•-c o.rcesco.•••mc--e2.2./..tcet,....t.zoo c.- lc'4.2.,c-cus ‘ CrUilltngiregl..= ---- iZ ; .-- 1 1 • ,•••••=-•...•,--.ct,/,--•,..,Cts c•-e..-.oc,evrArtz,,-,..• Z 1 •Ittot ".sosy co Rae.../......-1,10.{.....",•••••,••11•56.•••,••rE•••-••• ! Li/p1 1 P, ) _f ,-., tAg... Ip':.1, z. , ,42......... , . m . SITE STATISTICS ... — , -• . ,-1....... n.....s...244 own • .1 15 I I I I I It, — 11 . c c cleiclqckleldcicIcicic I e 11.1 ..,.,..4,4-.t IA=cc-(c•C T4M062.210TOK: ..ribodo . Bole:o i ..._ IIIMIBM • • i. ' j 1. -••••.. I "IMP' \ , ..•••• 8 OOP OLO: •• Newt,eel a 41 'I'l co 2 _ w • __ . • •,;•• 0. ,„„__. ... ... z • .:,,,, .' 5 g _.....-- ....-...,-:. torlOf V•OV.V.0.• .:./...111b a. a. CO E . 8 z ,.- ... ,.... LU LANDSCAPE PLAN 1.1 .. .6 srrEPLAN . . .. c.4 ..,03 ,.., .1 . , •r . - • . . • • 7 - • / • �, t — / PLANTING LEGEND • • ut • a�� tttra�"/// C 0x^,.cJs svE+r 4e(�'-zlror_:�mre ns craw) • z 8 i w�eN rxwo..::'s+creas•c4s+i 6,'\'� \ .. • • /C OI •, .1 erne (4,4 wr.rox.ouYac.u) 1•{.. ! Al � N • foie •'/."••'J' J1 (i0'-tF'14�{v.,'�G:SKVG. .� `� -.\\: ! ` p. Jca. • ... `�.wi rwri N,,2MnW i :iW:on 1 \� a� r.•Owao NM...(_ yw�f) \ \ \ 1 • sw,d , _ • •- (.(mxxo+ (4.9 s•2cbc.n790.4' • a .' . / lie ,, , fg1 ~• '�' f ;) t 0 , e- . • 01.0'_A -N —121 Ar..14.1141- • • . . g ... i- ... ,T ?Tt • p . .41 1 - it Pi 1 . *. , 'I ,.,, -• -4 L_ .fi11 .. ,._ . . s .: � �� $ VICINITY MAP �. IA - LEGAL DESCRIPTION • a \ ni ► r -9 ' :I fg11.. ./ „ MAD Lbe 40,Y.•STLCO OD•COMO IV M.D.ICU tO VID.dna..I.. --lifik-Tta:VAG PDD 4 . CD Man DO Mainvivit SI • I' ril g Iti� T. xr' t PROJECT NARRATIVE STATEMENT OF PROPOSED f } � iris 401 �---,' ao-_ I a a I I �p • I I • : nr+w•waa••.�s-�::.•+m,e_-,� wao+a 'CoObS:40gt, .7•444.d.A.�V _ F .o.w rs DILL e.(o-•vc* ?rm s-r LI • - ^4.199-PwuwrvT'we e9 .r ex e.w1. 8' � I��I� l � i � -._�gi� I I aU I a mmm. sr a.cwr.a•a•+'4"'r a ne a wa.n u 81 i - / — 1 I sa^e .•.o=�e..... �a-.m aw®saw w-n r.zos• •11 J / . 4 . . Siaa r'{ A 'F Y i 2 p SITE STATISTICS • - I • o, • t co 0-o O N n�. ,.,.�(�,,�, ) off' s I` I I 1 I_ �', l.I°.1 fi °I°có O so_o_"61440_o'+.�OtiO'..:.., rl..a, - - - r ,y, n<.am a..a.o• 'e.s+os . aeo tor.. ..,,n J k. cx • co P. g LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE PLAN • l�. - . . . . . , . . . , ..f,i 4N 4 'J'P.'IZ:i 33 T. ; 1 li 1;110111"1 r 0 . I . :OHS.4 S.. ---.. -. . _ i:r. V Fl.I ,,N ; 1 i: l', %; -I 1 1 11 Will1111,11; WI i " d ..:d t m 1 i 1.g dill i il I : ° . 1 . _ I 0 to • ' *., . d r ;is 0 ...,„= -.... • 0 C.ii,i'i V ii I IQ ililli'lli N93 11 ' Fl fin Z • , co i::,,;r M i -; rig ., ill . . : ci;'.:11 1•••ts 4 . ' I ' ' . .............. A, _._, ''t;:j C 1 1111141111 P 2 • I 1/10 •+,• • :° •I'• ,•iI:' '2 1; I tio i. cry OF RENT4N4F---- 7 . , ifr. . 9i rlt; 0 1 ii,g,h1 •I . v. lg • i'PI ttt,', .71 I 11; : I' , !7. ' 1 1111111 1 , pm IREV1N teI aer-Nye ......E . or 0; yi T NI i -4It s . . . • .,*4f 5a gb,i !! g ..04.1, . • . • , i Ei, ,,..,:,, go_ __ I •.° c : ' • • , • • I ,__ , 1 g . • ., ,.. !P -....,ts • . • . co 0 •-, .064) '"'''• 1111;.- . • .-----.\ _ _ x ,,•-•••••,..t).4% •• , limy Giba,3• oe,.. .........144M-9•Nono.00ste.to•OIAOAA. 0.2.41111tt,/i, . . ' Mr W.. -.M...• t Vi / 114 Y.14111No'N ' 11 . - iiii°...1710 . • Y/Pi 1 1 1 fitt / //,'N\-N .aft. ellIk. ...10t........,.4;2L. ..e, / • • - .10041WoreVsoWeltrAilloo„ / i! , . 1.41.,). f...vreitioant. • . . ' . 1 ''' ‘Iiir"st*P511 , 'WY • . . • . , . ' /\'‘... ... • JUL . . •• ti ... WI 1 1 • ii 1 • ' eta"• , \ ,.,••,,, . 4 re . m. Ain. Imes ..41,.. I ask. .araL amt. rt. - __ cifv....,4?-...7.......x.. •aTitercrAiro-0 gererips,—, :Vox' ,,,cosilip. 4!... _•\1.. Alcsit' r-,,, ..) - i IIIPP 1 I SPI11.. TOY'. d IN rAL___.•411i.,..trait't.'...., i \ a ler.) ; ! 1 ; ,... i 1 i i !KA •. t .. ...„......., . Ili,: , • .... : ........ ....... ..., ....... ....,," ,•• gel , . t'41.P0+.11!`41/4"ween"I'rorr:',--7r.'Ire•ritrAfigrl-o2raiirtitc . -1°.. ''.-.eifIri=s-glilikes,1.14Air"LbOreWilk ...,... ' viliv viar , ' 'V. low- iripi - °- . lo, ito• IIP ! • — . T 1 • 1 I ... 1 >. ''•.,' 4 ,.0' 1.1,14.W. " .....".........."..- 1111411"1 11111 1 . I I . r; :"'? ''''.* • MP re g310:101 6 -- 10'llogi IA il 11 1 i : ,„ Aggil!iligli! - I k" 1511-X-71;1 I I t1"1 111_ 1,!: ; r ? ,,,,A.. --t. . '4'4 ',.. . - . , - •..t 1 > s, _ ..\•••( ., ., 2 ) 1 • . ° ( i'il': . A k A \\*.J • . **4 k co t-\12 . \ • 0 . •''''Il ^ 1,i,t '•••• I.:. \‘7 \ , . s - •;•,li• . ._ _ 't \•t- ---, LI ;+ . •ii• ilii I 11 1 1 11:: ;I' i '.1- ri-.------7° "8. • - ,:".: • '-- - ---T.-- 1,,. •I di ‘- P 3'+'•I•I-1 'I',•••i'•'°'• -..."•• Ix,1..r-sr •••s et ''''. ' •.'. , 7. - ....--m_ / ,,.''..,:'1' --•—41 '-'94L—”' , 311. i I li 1_[ 1 45 LI „ - 1 , Ill . ILL] I I ir , . t ...o.,. 0 " . > 11 . . • . , r i ' 11111111Winiablihwa.ausiseit.terctahit rattositer','w161thg.,4-.'''''ciati.n,htVit'.9=74=-1,Virate,..,-"mirustiew""Eglia"Altamingat-einui (SITE PLAN AND STATISTICS 0 ...I.------ . _ - 7 7-_. .-=-_-_-_ ... 700 SITE PARKING DEVELOPMENT PLAN `-'"" - - - -- - ' -- - - ----- ,`..1, -"f-1 •ESH PROPERTIES RENTON WASHINGTON ..1.. • ...3 ................ c..... ..., ......,...... . . 1 t I ti • , I I t. . a . 1' OPBRT 1 B� P. 0. Box 598 Bellevue, Washington 98009 (206) 454-5959 CITY Ca nti:NIO' August 18 , 1986 "� h 'N sin • I. AUG 18 1986 Mr . Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator City Of Renton �1 200 Mill Avenue South CITY OF RENTON Renton, Washington 98055 SATE PLAN REVIEW RE: S . W. 7th Street Parking Lot EXHIBIT Ni 6 Dear Mr. Blaylock: ITEM1\10.______SilaiCerlr"a42 Following up on our meeting Wednesday, August 13, 1986, we are offering the following clarification of the issue. 1 . The proposed parking lot is a REPLACEMNET of the existing parking provided on the South side of the S .W. 7th Street for the IBM/Collings Buildings. 2 . Presently the two buildings are combined under one ownership and represent one legal parcel to function as an Office Park occupied by The Boeing Commercial Airplane Company. 3 . The proposed parking lot meets the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the Manufacturing Park Zoning. The Plan ' s intent seems to create an Office Park setting and encourages higher intensity office uses. Approximately Thirty- Four Percent (34%) of the site will be landscaped. g 4. Under contractual agreement with Boeing, we are required to provide stalls for overflow parking in addition to the normal stall count demanded by the Zoning Code. 5 . The change in parking is necessary solely because of the refinancing of the IBM/Collins Office Complex. The parking on the South side of N. E. 7th Street is leased, however refinancing demands ownership. 6 . It is anticipated that if The Boeing Commercial Airplane Company vacates the complex, the additional parking could be utilized for the construction of a building on the subject side. 7. E & H Properties will impliment a Transportation Management Plan by working with Metro not only to cover the IBM/Collins Building but also the Hormel Building located immediately to the east of the subject site. azt;-- • �7 [[r..�f (¢?�';� �S tt�r a tit; F n� I.�, I':, rr 1 RRya p Fes„Y”. Pt;!i Es L�a S•a..a,l,.,n trJ9 e';1�. �.;.. .. .,,�. .. 5;.:�,i.Wm..... N.w��y l� r,:fr is {7 .17 9 CZ'l n. CITY OF RENTON SITE PLAN REVIEW August 15 , 1986 EXHIBIT NO Mr. Roger Blaylock ITEM NO. 0 rte.Etis Renton Building & Zoning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Reference: Proposed parking on S.W. 7th St. Dear Mr. Blaylock, In response to the comments outlined in the environmental checklists by the respective reviewing departments, we are submitting this letter, and revised drawings, addressing the concerns as noted. The following list outlines our compliance with those comments: (1) Site lighting has been added to the parking plan, and a fixture has been specified. (2) The drainage plan was submitted on 8-24-86. The design calls for an oil & sand separator to filter the on-site runoff prior to its connection with the storm sewer under S.W. 7th St. (3) Seismic considerations were not taken into account because no building structure is being proposed for the site. (4) Soil loading considerations also were not applicable because of the nominal loading of automobiles. Future building construction, however, would have to address the issue under a separate permit. (5) There are no trees on the existing undeveloped site. A note has been added to the landscape plan acknowledging this fact. New trees will be planted as indicated on the landscape plan. (6) To aid the on-site traffic circulation, we are adding an addi- tional entrance/exit onto S.W. 7th St., at the west end of the site. Our statistics have been adjusted accordingly. -oE ) �:1 100 WEST I—IAr7—RISON PLAZA / 5;I.1I"[f.= ,l_r=3 SLAT[LE, WA SING T GN 9E3119 / [2061 2E32-8512 . Mr . Roger Blaylock August 18, 1986 Page Two The Boeing Commercial Airplane Company presently has a program for shuttle buses and van pools on the IBM/Collins Office Park side . Even though several bus routes are available to the employees, we recognize the need to address the need for mass transit . 8. If it is necessary, E & H Properties will remove the temporary parking Lot existing on the South side of the street . 9 . The purpose of the application is to replace the temporary parking therefore the new parking lot will not add additional traffic on the city streets. It is solely a REPLACEMENT. All of our efforts in managing the properties are directed to satisfy the tenants ' demands and secure their continuing occupancy. It was strongly suggested to us by our tenants that these facilities need modernization and upgrading. The requested refinancing will in large measure be applied to that end. We believe the esthetical improvements coincides with City plans to establish an enhanced image and get away from a sea of warehouses and toward attractive office buildings and parks. We trust these clarifications will enable you to issue the necessary Declaration and Permits. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, E & H PROPERTIES ugene Horbach EH: tad . el ii . PkW?ffiaIIL, I'. 0. Box 598 Bellevue, Washington 98009 (206) 454-5959 CITY OF RENTON SITE PLAN REVIEW EXHIBIT NO _ � .� 0, ��, August 22, 1986 ITEM NO. AU h 2 2 636 iii Mr. Roger Blaylock BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Curtis Beattie & Associates ECF-069-86, SA-079-86 Dear Mr . Blaylock: In response to the Environmental Review Committee ' s proposal to issue a Mitigated Declaration of Non-Significance for the above project , E & H Properties hereby amends its application in the following manner: 1 . The temporary parking lot existing on the south side of S .W. 7th Street will be removed from operation on the day after a Certificate of Occupancy is granted by the Building and Zoning Department by placing a steel guard rail across all entrances . 2 . We recognize that the, mitigated declaration of non-significance is applicable only to the 184 parking spaces. The parking lot cannot be expanded beyond the present needs of the IBM/Collins Office Complex. Any change would result in a completely new environmental review. 3. We will enter into and prepare a transportation management plan for the IBM/Collins Office Complex to the satisfaction of METRO prior to the occupancy of the parking lot . 4. We will have our attorney prepare restrictive covenants to be placed on the parking lot to run with the land that states: • a. This parking lot is required to serve the present parking needs per City of Renton .Municipal Code of the IBM/Collins Office Park. • 4''1 August 21 , 1986 Mr . Roger Blaylock Page Two b. The parking lot may not be converted to any other use unless an equal amount of replacement parking is provided for this office park such that the office park is in compliance with the City' s Parking and Loading Ordinance at the time the replacement parking is proposed. c . Should any additional structures be built on the subject site , sufficient parking shall be provided to satisfy the City of Renton ' s Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements for both the on-site structures and the IBM/Collins Office Park, unless the property owner of the IBM/Collins Office Complex has acquired adequate legal parking per 4(b) above . These restrictive covenances will be prepared and filed at the direction of the City of Renton Building and Zoning Department just prior to the issuance of the building permit for the parking lot . Thank you again for the opportunity to address the environmental concerns of the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee. Very truly yours, E & H PROPER IES C-25 Eu ene orbach EH: tad C91'Y ®F RENTON lAUJ G ? 2 1986 BUILDING /?ONING DEPT. • (7) The vicinity plan dated 7-24-86 has been revised to show the proposed parking site to be less than 500 ft. away from the buildings it is to serve. Please let us know if any additional information is required. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS (71.0E"i(- Scott A . Douglas SAD/ml cc: Mr. Eugene Horbach 3 . . 1111 ......., ... Wiz/AEA- 1!,L-Pet. / /// , , :•., / / ' 77, • / ,. . , /74//4 . • /, 7 /rgo ro6E.12 ' 15rA eq..veq, / , , Lou-iti6 -.. rft4E-14-1Nely4,/ /) 7 ' . 7/7/ - I - S.W. r7 ST. >- e 4 41IN t> z IN11 :_--, , viciki I -T'r rt_INN 1 ) INFoRmATiot-i pece-ivE.2 FRom MLA- rA,64" Go, - No, -a7 W.. gr.1-410M 7•?A- .tql) I"= Zoal 4 ,112.E. [-Iva- eNealNeeig. ...__ r . . . 1 y OF J iv .� . ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT o 2 o RONALD G. NELSON,- DIRECTOR 0,9 co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9q�EQ 8Erceo BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR TO PARTIES OF RECORD Attached please find a copy of the Determination of Non-significance given by the Environmental Review Committee on August 20, 1986. There is a 14-day appeal period following the date of publication. If you have any questions, please call 235-2550. Sincerely, �� V L6IVO& Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator 2046N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-069-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-079-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to construct a 184 stall parking lot on a 2.24 acr site, with perimeter and interior landscaping and a storm water drainage system per City of Renton standards. PROPONENT: Curtis Beattie & Assoc. Architects LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 700 S.W. 7th Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this amended proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including: 1. Revised Site/Landscape Plan/Received August 18, 1986 2. Revised Site/Drainage Plan/Received August 18, 1986 3. Letter from Scott Douglas/Received August 18, 1986 4. Letter from Eugene Horbach Responding to ERC Concerns/Dated August 18, 1986 5. Letter from Eugene Horbach Amending Application/Dated August 22, 1986 on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than 5 p.m. Monday, September 8, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: August 20, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: August 25, 1986 to A '4 ona d G. Nelson Larry M. S' nger Building and Zoning Director Policy Dev- .pmenl Director Richard C. ghton Public Works irector I N OT I C E • . ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION • • - APPLICATION NO. ECF-069-86 APPLICANT CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A PARKING LOT ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE WITH LANDSCAPING & STORM DRAINAGE PER CITY STANDARDS, SA-079-86 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 700 S.W. 7TH STREET POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES ,DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY SEPTEMBER 8, 1986 • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON. HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., SFPTFMBFR 8; 1986 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO. NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WI' 1OUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 2039N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (ECF-074-86) Application for conditional use permit to allow the construction of a structure (flagpole) on the roof of the hospital which will exceed the 50 foot height limit of the P-1 zone, file CU-085-86; property located at 400 South 43rd Street. THE AUSTIN COMPANY (ECF-070-86) Application for special permit to allow the fill and grading on 18.18 acres of property with 98,000 cubic yards of material to come from the excavation of the P-1 drainage channel, file SP-080-86. The fill is to be located on an area of land bounded on the north by the extension of S.W. 19th Street, on the east by the extension of Raymond Avenue S.W., on the south by the proposed P-9 channel, and on the west by the proposed P-1 channel. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: 1Z CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOC. ARCHITECTS (ECF-069-86) Application for site plan approval to construct a 184 stall parking lot on a 2.24 acre site, with perimeter and interior landscaping and a storm water drainage system per City of Renton standards, file SA-079-86; property located at 700 S.W. 7th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by September 8, 1986. Published: August 25, 1986 1.7 OF R.4, 4,a di o THE CITY OF RENTON ® z • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 n0 _ o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9,o ro• 0,9gT�D SEP-r°5 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR C.:FY OF :F.ENi''k.O'i (1 W1 I, Irk f L! DATE: August 21, 1986 jiLl AUG 2 1986 TO: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator DING/1ONiNG DEPT. FROM: Nancy Laswell Morris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Curtis Beattie & Assoc. ECF 069-86, SA 079-86 On August 20, 1986, the ERC took the following actions on the above referenced project: Issued a mitigated declaration of non-significance, subject to the following covenants and conditions: (1) The temporary parking lot existing on the south side of S.W. 7th Street will be removed. (2) This application has been determined to be a replacement parking lot for the temporary lot existing on the south side of S.W. 7th Street and is required in the public interest to support the City's ordinance requirements for parking for the IBM/Collins Office Park complex. This office park complex does not presently meet code for parking. The uses in the buildings/office park would require 551 stalls of parking. The buildings contain 368 on-site spaces. The complex therefore lacks 183 spaces for code compliance for parking spaces. This approval would permit the development of 184 parking spaces which would be sufficient to bring the buildings into compliance with,the City's codes and ordinances. (3) This mitigated declaration of non-significance is only applicable to the proposed 184 parking spaces. The potential 30% expansion of parking on this lot is specifically excluded. Any expansion would 'be considered a new parking lot and would be subject to further environmental review including a sub-area transportation study, and Metro TMP conformance. (4) This approval is conditioned upon the provision and implementation of a transportation management plan for the IBM/Colllins Bldg. complex satisfactory to Metro. Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator August 21, 1986 Page 2 (5) A covenant will be placed on this parking lot to run with the land which will provide that this parking lot is required to serve the IBM/Collins Office Park. The parking lot may not be converted to any other use unless an equal amount of superior replacement parking is provided for this Office Park such that the office park is in compliance with the City's parking ordinance. Should any additional structures be built on this site, sufficient parking will be provided to satisfy the parking ordinance requirements both for the on-site structures and the IBM/Collins Office Park. NLM:wr 2067G "JVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW !„--,:T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: AUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12, 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2 . 24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITFIN 500 FEET (500 ' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S .W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2 . 24 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CITY C*RENTON I (-3p M 11 1.4 Fr7, S E P u 196o � RECOMMENDATION: F7I. DNS n MITIGATED DNS ri EIS REVIEWED BY: (/ann mOP (J TITLE: hi rGatd-44/ DATE: / ? W/ /? /t-Y(/' FORM #14 RENT I BUILDING. & ZONING DER MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 069 .- 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184. STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500• FEET (500' ) . LOCATION : LOCATED .ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/13/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0111 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT . 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • EI POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Pa-U'---/ )- AC6/2'u4,4 c APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED /4‘"-- d&eJ /2ei71- 4 dd,e rr " e deJ 16'/Q are A-- DATE: /if16/T4 /tie SIGNA OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ►IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI n , r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I 11` DATE CIRCULATED: AUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12, 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2. 24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2.24 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: Aenlot Fire f'r`le,.,c De "-.) 1.4 Olify RECOMMENDATION: Er DNS Q MITIGATED DNS D EIS REVIEWED BY: 4/ ',4 TITLE: DATE: /27 /9,0‘ FORM #14 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DM MEAT olk DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET i50O' ) . LOCATION : LOCATED •ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th 'STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 8/13/86 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : EIUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION. ow FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ' DAIROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ,056 -- DATE: 6, y /YYZ SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 LnVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S..„T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: AUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12, 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2 . 24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500 ' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S .W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2,24 ACRES__ BUILDING AREA (gross): N/1, IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth " \ 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health ?4- 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services _ 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: 1(?.) T Nt PF\KKt( iG LOT' TO eDE, I NGLuDED w TRM P Fi c, bt%►'X FI-r / tR ? RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: � F ivvA(A TITLE: p DATE: c� 1 ,�T t5(6 FORM ##14 RENT BUILDING. & ZONING DEP/_ rMENT e DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : N/A ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184. STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET i500' ). LOCATION : LOCATED •ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th 'STREET 'AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/13/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT liq' :NG & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT Ei POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2.ON 1 (\-. El APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS LINOT APPROVED .J �, Lyn 0 DATE: o - gob SIGNATURE OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Fnrm 1149 '' IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW ! T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: U \ \ (-- I T) e_}� �b N • DATE CIRCULATED: AUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12, 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2. 24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2. 24 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): u/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services re 17 16) Utilities COMMENTS: % 1 i RECOMMENDATION: IN DNS El MITIGATED DNS ED EIS '' UT/�G/.T ,,NG/N,E4 ' REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: o /Z Aro FORM #14 ,, RENT--- BUILDING & ZONING DEPI 'MENT A # DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 069 — 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : N/A . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON— CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184. STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/13/86 • ENGINEERING DIVISION O TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4TILITIES ENG . DIVISION Eil FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT O OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI ION ; !/T",l,L/T ,g/sa-ti/„E.E.R> /. 6 El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONSl F�'TD NOT APPROVED RECOMMEND CO b ERATION OF SEPARATE IRRIGATION METER FOR LANDSCAPE SPRINKLER I.' i, 'i 4 VAL SUBJECT TOJ SYSTEMS AND OTHER USAGE" �,' EE�IEFi�-is WHEREBY WATER DOES NOT ENTER -` _-- /VD _ THE SEWER SYSTEM TO SAVE OTT -`� .._; a SEWER AND METRO CHARGES. '„ -3 �... ,_ CHARGE •l:;:L L.1-_,� .'�/Y� ,.. ''// _ �� t CHARGE-SLIVER - o .�r X 9 7'G d rs �9 9. .? _. AEA CHARGE-WATER /1/n . T MM CHARGE-SE IER AM t lows* .4 t- *5 fh„,/lr." k LP g Ammo ° LOCATIONS 011 • TIE now MALYSISQ20__ No DATE; 8 i - /e� SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW ! T C REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �� l-'� I NC— ( J� • DATE CIRCULATED: AUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12, 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2. 24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF. S.W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2. 24 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics I 11) Light and Glare I 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation l 15) Public Services I 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: 81 DNS MITIGATED DNS Q EIS • REVIEWED B • i TITLE: DATE: ,y�l1 ( FORM #14 `' 'ill‘ RENT"I BUILDING & ZONING DEP, PMENT v :r DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ). LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/13/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 0 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ID PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ETBUILDING & ZONIG DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Ei OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l GD f2( PPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ID NOT APPROVED i - ,_ e" _ — DATE: C917/4 SIGNATU IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW : T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PO t_- 6:) T--' FT • DATE CIRCULATED: AUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12, 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING. LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2. 24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF. S.W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2.24 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: 6-( 2-vco `1D0 �a��C� ��CE�� 1 CiJ O �L bi w�t�C4 // d RECOMMENDATION: El DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS Q EIS • REVIEWED BY: -Z cC - 7 TITLE: DATE: �f� U FORM #14 " REN1 I BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184. STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET i500' ). LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/13/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 0 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Eil PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT jJ POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,� APPROVED EC APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED X-e.c."...f.-7 ----- „„X 9 -32) Ti�/// DATE: /S-K SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 R mr. `Y • '''�i' 'IIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SI . VOL ip p=�'� c__c� ( K,\ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT. DATE CIRCULATED: AUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12. 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 CITY OF RENTON PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES AUG 4 1986 PROJECT TITLE: N/A POLICY 711-.,...L1IYrT-N y t it V 1 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2. 24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF. S.W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2.24 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): M/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water ✓ 4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare �✓ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: �Q�a a,Lc�. _ e e �( i,•,t Iz2� /�et.��,L c� ,c.w et.tiL.6z_ C Ar-vOtat cc_A---c-A- •.� OL eA �.�C ,l t e � i fit.-.ti's-1 . 11„' •iJ��,•�c�vt. � i✓v�w�v`e. ��-e--�—a_� , . • RECOMMENDATION: El DNS Q MITIGATED DNS El EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: a DATE: (2 / 3> )7i(P FORM #14 RENT- BUILDING & ZONING DEPP'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ). LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th 'STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/13/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : E] UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT O POLICE DEPARTMENT EIPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : • APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS i NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 cjVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S.--T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (-Cm l �C �\ V ' DATE CIRCULATED: AUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12, 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLQW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF• S.W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2.24 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: [gi DNS E] MITIGATED DNS 0 EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: ��y � FORM #14 = RENT BUILDING. & ZONING DEPI ',WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT; CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE ; N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184. STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500: FEET i500' ). LOCATION ; LOCATED ,ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th 'STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/13/86 E(ENGINEERING DIVISION . TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT ri POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; • APPROVED � APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ,NOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • Q,VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S.._..T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 12--0 AVc (:-- - DATE CIRCULATED: PUG. 1, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: AUG. 12 . 1986 ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 PROPONENT: CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2. 24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . LOCATION: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF. S.W. 7TH STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. SITE AREA: 2.24 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants /'/ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health L/ 8) Land and Shoreline Use c/ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation v 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: - A� f��s po, � t ,„ 7L. c, ,�� c/z) .s mot l v I ?`/Pe a f fA p-7 s o ' b , ) 4, 7-- b�= P y-b 1-vl U `/-! 1 -a. ct,C fl a ! Y a TJ G 7 G 17 as ✓JG��, ! Pry// 6 y 672,7e o?Le , i le, cc e l� l ,Af[e_ a M 5; 1 J Gay. ?Do s 2-,.k Pe)o Ls 6 47-1-- I S �St 1 Vaq1;- aha ) .)s �� b 12/,(1/ It)/4:4 IA) /1--0 do/," 71johQ. / Y 7 , RECOMMENDATION: E. DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: ��4 P'J') TITLE: DATE: p� /5� FORM 1114 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEP,' _'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • ECF - 069 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-079-86 (SITE PLAN APPROVAL) PROPONENT : CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : N/A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184. STALLS ON A 2.24 ACRE SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500: FEET i500' ). LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th 'STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 8/13/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Ei UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON AUGUST 12, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : A7r, _ Fl APPROVED Ei APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /9T l/5 por,77L /cd 11//ne -flle c\beS no,_, kz,N0k -F cpc_ a a aveuQkioarv _ANT 7CDm0k, c ca c\A, i v\ \C - I -17 a •i C b i� ve �° "� l.\C� 5. cocov\AcC the_ r� 1 � o cl `iar`70 of Y vc- c\ c,k,sz,1 %,Q C psrc -) t c4 w c�‘: • DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHO IZED REPRES NTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 i LS . OF R. \;. o THE CITY OF RENTON C �e '.,0- z .,, POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 0 0� 2) MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 013 CO' 94). SEP1E0, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR DATE: August 21, 1986 TO: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator FROM: Nancy Laswell Morris, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Curtis Beattie & Assoc. ECF 069-86, SA 079-86 On August 20, 1986, h ERF took the following actions on the above refs enced project: _Lta ,ssue- 1 °To, iS • a mitigated declaration of non-significance,p, subject to the '''`«`""- following covenants and conditions: w.�Dle (1) The temporary parking lot existing on the south side of S.W. 7th Street will be removed. (2) This application has been determined to be a replacement parking lot for the temporary lot existing on the south side of S.W. 7th Street and is required in the public interest to support the City's ordinance requirements for parking for the IBM/Collins Office Park complex. This office park complex does not presently meet code for parking. The uses in the buildings/office park would require 551 stalls of parking. The buildings contain 368 on-site spaces. The complex therefore lacks 183 spaces for code compliance for parking spaces. This approval would permit the development of 184 parking spaces which would be sufficient to bring the buildings into compliance with the City's codes and ordinances. (3) This mitigated declaration of non-significance is only applicable to the proposed 184 parking spaces. The potential 30% expansion of parking on this lot is specifically excluded. Any expansion would be considered a new parking lot and would be subject to further environmental review including a sub-area transportation study, and Metro TMP conformance. (4) This approval is conditioned upon the provision and implementation of a transportation management plan for the IBM/Colllins Bldg. complex satisfactory to Metro. ,., Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator August 21, 1986 Page 2 (5) A covenant will be placed on this parking lot to run with the land which will provide that this parking lot is required to serve the IBM/Collins Office Park. The parking lot may not be converted to any other use unless an equal amount of superior replacement parking is provided for this Office Park such that the office park is in compliance with the City's parking ordinance. Should any additional structures be built on this site, sufficient parking will be provided to satisfy the parking ordinance requirements both for the on-site structures and the IBM/Collins Office Park. NLM:wr 2067G . H . PROPUR1 IL P. O. Box 598 Bellevue, Washington 98009 (ZOO 454-5959 _C3 OFRENTON August 22 , 1986 0) 11 V 1 Mr . Roger Blaylock BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South firff ,� Renton, Washington 98055 �� o NM grin RE : Curtis Beattie & Associates ECF-069-86 SA-079-86 p7.54) :rr� r , - Dear Mr . Blaylock: ___ - ._._•,. _,,.._ .._ . .. In response to the Environmental Review Committee ' s proposal to issue a Mitigated Declaration of Non-Significance for the above project , E & H Properties hereby amends its application in the following manner : 1 . The temporary parking lot existing on the south side of S .W. 7th Street will be removed from operation on the day after a Certificate of Occupancy is granted by the Building and Zoning Department by placing a steel guard rail across all entrances . 2 . We recognize that the mitigated declaration of non-significance is applicable only to the 184 parking spaces . The parking lot cannot be expanded beyond the present needs of the IBM/Collins Office Complex. Any change would result in a completely new environmental review. 3 . We will enter into and prepare a transportation management plan for the IBM/Collins Office Complex to the satisfaction of METRO prior to the occupancy of the parking lot . 4 . We will have our attorney prepare restrictive covenants to be placed on the parking lot to run with the land that states : a . This parking lot is required to serve the present parking needs per City of Renton Municipal Code of the IBM/Collins Office Park. {t. August 21 , 1986 Mr . Roger Blaylock Page Two b. The parking lot may not be converted to any other use unless an equal amount of replacement parking is provided for this office park such that the office park is in compliance with the City' s Parking and Loading Ordinance at the time the replacement parking is proposed. c . Should any additional structures be built on the subject site, sufficient parking shall be provided to satisfy the City of Renton' s Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements for both the on-site structures and the IBM/Collins Office Park, unless the property owner of the IBM/Collins Office Complex has acquired adequate legal parking per 4(b) above. These restrictive covenances will be prepared and filed at the direction of the City of Renton Building and Zoning Department just prior to the issuance of the building permit for the parking lot . Thank you again for the opportunity to address the environmental concerns of the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee . Very truly yours, E & H PROPERTIES 4-7-4)C--)3 Eu ene orbach EH: tad C9m( 0)FRENTON 1 : CrEOViT RUG 2 2, 1986 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. . H . 'TOPE 1U1' IE P. O. Box 598 Bellevue, Washington 98009 (206) 454-5959 August 18 , 1986 MY"-‘ k veU CNtra ; v a 4 fit �44ff AUG 1 8 1986 L ' Mr . Roger Blaylock Zoning Administrator City Of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South MY OF REt TON Renton, Washington 98055 OE PLAN REVIEW RE : S . W. 7th Street Parking Lot E,, ]1: Dear Mr. Blaylock: ITEM Following up on our meeting Wednesday, August 13, 1986, we are offering the following clarification of the issue. 1 . The proposed parking lot is a REPLACEMNET of the existing parking provided on the South side of the S .W. 7th Street for the IBM/Collings Buildings. 2 . Presently the two buildings are combined under one ownership and represent one legal parcel to function as an Office Park occupied by The Boeing Commercial Airplane Company. 3 . The proposed parking lot meets the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and the Manufacturing Park Zoning. The Plants intent seems to create an Office Park setting and encourages higher intensity office uses. Approximately Thirty- Four Percent (34%) of the site will be landscaped. 4 . Under contractual agreement with Boeing, we are required to provide stalls for overflow parking in addition to the normal stall count demanded by the Zoning Code. 5 . The change in parking is necessary solely because of the refinancing of the IBM/Collins Office Complex. The parking on the South side of N. E. 7th Street is leased, however refinancing demands ownership. 6 . It is anticipated that if The Boeing Commercial Airplane Company vacates the complex, the additional parking could be utilized for the construction of a building on the subject side . 7 . E & H Properties will impliment a Transportation Management Plan by working with Metro not :only to cover the IBM/Collins Building but also the Hormel Building located immediately to the east of the subject site. lOr _ Mr . Roger Blaylock August 18, 1986 Page Two The Boeing . Commercial Airplane Company presently has a program for shuttle buses and van pools on the IBM/Collins Office Park side. Even though several bus routes are available to the employees, we recognize the need to address the need for mass transit . 8. If it is necessary, E & H Properties will remove the temporary parking Lot existing on the South side of the street . 9 . The purpose of the application is to replace the temporary parking therefore the new parking lot will not add additional traffic on the city streets. It is solely a REPLACEMENT. All of our efforts in managing the properties are directed to satisfy the tenants ' demands and secure their continuing occupancy. It was strongly suggested to us by our tenants that these facilities need modernization and upgrading. The requested refinancing will in large measure be applied to that end. We believe the esthetical improvements coincides with City plans to establish an enhanced image and get away from a sea of warehouses and toward attractive office buildings and parks. We trust these clarifications will enable you to issue the necessary Declaration and Permits. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, E & H PROPERTIES ugene Horbach EH: tad • August 15 , 1986 Mr. Roger Blaylock Renton Building & Zoning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Reference: Proposed parking on S.W. 7th St. Dear Mr. Blaylock, In response to the comments outlined in the environmental checklists by the respective reviewing departments, we are submitting this letter, and revised drawings, addressing the concerns as noted. The following list outlines our compliance with those comments: (1) Site lighting has been added to the parking plan, and a fixture has been specified. (2) The drainage plan was submitted on 8-24-86 . The design calls for an oil & sand separator to filter the on-site runoff prior to its connection with the storm sewer under S.W. 7th St. (3) Seismic considerations were not taken into account because no building structure is being proposed for the site. (4) Soil loading considerations also were not applicable because of the nominal loading of automobiles. Future building construction, however, would have to address the issue under a separate permit. (5) There are no trees on the existing undeveloped site. A note has been added to the landscape plan acknowledging this fact. New trees will be planted as indicated on the landscape plan. (6) To aid the on-site traffic circulation, we are adding an addi- tional entrance/exit onto S.W. 7th St. , at the west end of the site. Our statistics have been adjusted accordingly. -471 CITY OF tIENTON 11; 1 nJ REVIEW ®• 100 WEST HARRISON PLAZA / SUITE 220 / SEATTLE, VVASIHINGTON 98119 / (20E] 282-85112 (7) The vicinity plan dated 7-24-86 has been revised to show the proposed parking site to be less than 500 ft. away from the buildings it is to serve. Please let us know if any additional information is required. Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS get-A• Scott A . Douglas SAD/ml cc: Mr. Eugene Horbach • i ,-2ra31•4It9N -1W7 -a-elf 4 . 1 ooz'=„1 . NOlt � ."M Lz� 'oN - 'o'J 1W O J "t171 WorJ� a-9^i- N011`dW�0A-11.: �� ' -tn , N'UU )1_ I NI-I/ . I. ,. I I - --.1S L "M'S . . . ' • - . vr:// „:,-, . : . . , ,/,, ;, . - .. I :- :. , . .. . . • ////,„/„„/— 2N 171zhdd�. 1 %�ari� ,rno� ../ / 'henna .v4411 // a290c10Jd - i .. // '/ //iV• / - .,1/ • ... .....` / : r --, C.' , 17 . - . . OF R4'ti� '• TED: 8-.—: . T. 9,0 rr . 0,9grED SEset0)Q OF PENDING A , A p LI _ Ti .. "- Ill:. SITE PLAN APPROVAL, SA-079-86 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT CONTAINING 184 STALLS ON A 2.24. ACRES SITE TO SUPPORT AN OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX WITHIN 500 FEET (500' ) . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF S.W. 7th STREET AT THE 700 BLOCK. UBLIC APPROVALS REQUI ' El : 1. ) SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2. ) BUILDING PERMIT ' PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING &c ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. ***** COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL AUGUST 20, 1986, 5 : 00 P.M. ***** FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPART '. ENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 400._ Curtis beattie & asso es 11,107 3 CDF Un ,` RMRIDTMIL architects 100 West Harrison Plaza/Suite 220 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 DATE /j JOB NO. (206) 282.8512 ATTENTION ' { L L(j V J I � /�� Fr /yy�y��+H 19• ' TO [OI , /_1�V21•�`- % (�L/I�IIIv64 'i =al 1 ' RE: r I \�a IV \ ikr Y i 6/ N WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples ❑ Specifications Copy of letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION / GoV/- A . zCiTY Or -;r it i .1,71 AUG -41986 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval cga For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment 0 ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 2 Mg- DN P� ► ' C/��I TD�� lyt,i2 , l_l N.c7 6i= -207�12 l=�l 402M0N Ad-- F IL= Dl L_l 4 N �DLYIe-- -7• �OCo 1--L—`Z4�I�71� , A, 0-1 ,tiaer\.‘ l OF Al q--( COPY TO- - 1 SIGNED: i PROOOCT2403 f,a 7Inc.Croton,Mass 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at ce • ©UPToa 3=M13 ors©[ o'c ©`0 July24 , 1986 Mr. Roger Blaylock Renton Building & Zoning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. South Renton, WA 98055 Reference: Proposed parking on S.W. 7th St. Dear Mr. Blaylock, This letter shall confirm the intent of Mr. Eugene Horbach to develop the referenced parking lot as interim accessory parking for the IBM-Collins Building site. This parking plan fulfills the requirements of Section 4-2204-3C2 of the Renton Code as follows: (a) As noted on the enclosed vicinity plan, our proposed off-site parking is located 467 feet from the property line of the site we intend to serve, thus fulfilling the 500 foot maximum restriction. (b) The parking lot conforms to all applicable provisions of ordinance No. 3988. (c) No automobile repair service will be conducted on the proposed parking site. (d) We are not in a residential zone so this restriction is not applicable. If you have any further questions or comments, please call . Sincerely yours, CURTIS BEATTIE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 01,4-1( • Scott A . Douglas SAD/ml . r 4.), 1 cc: Mr. Eugene Horbach Enclosures JUL 28 1986 100 WEST HARRISON PLAZA / SUITE 220 / SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 / [206] 282-8512 • , 11 9861, 19 g.1fl(' ,,. �.-,� �e+ :d 23 it 6' :�'.i a- 7;'-rs 4?F', - - - .. ./ . ,�yzQo,',-)•I V " : NOlN��I -M L'Z. 'oN I 'off r91 -10-J71 Wo�J d-jlNis�-rJ N OI1.7V O�iJI` � _ i' r N'd-IU ,L11N I-)I/ tyy . , - 21 " .. .- -23_ . . • - �'L(9t� - . . _ J S L AA'S - _ - _ ��: '` /�N171 dd ::;'aria s4.irno-7. /.,,),.,. 't-7a"1C1 vdGi - /- Q39O I O-JA i • . ' A- i/ji/.'// . / -++-� .�` • . / 7-7-7 . . . ,C OF R�� t$ z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - c RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9Immo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0,9q"ft SEP1°# BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 30, 1986 Scott Douglas Curtis Beattie & Associates, Architects 100 West Harrison Plaza, Suite 220 Seattle, Washington 98119 SUBJECT: PROPOSED 184 STALL PARKING LOT S.W. 7th STREET/FILE SA-079-86 Dear Mr. Douglas: The staff of the Renton Building and Zoning Department have done a preliminary review of the above referenced site plan approval application. Before we will continue on with departmental review, it will be necessary that we receive some additional information with the following items in order to proceed: 1. A brief narrative statement was included on the site plan submitted. Please expand with this narrative statement on a separate sheet of paper as a justification that this lot will serve an office building within five hundred feet (500'). 2. Provide a second site plan illustrating the proposed parking lot and the building for Which it is intended to serve. This plan should also show any proposed' walkways that will serve or link the two properties. Please provide seven (7) copies of the above referenced items to the Building and Zoning Department at your earliest convenience so that we may proceed with. our review. Sincerely, Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator . RJB:ss 3012Z by - &JTY OF RENTO' ` FILE NO(S): -c��)9 " BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT S7 . off • 1'W� MASTER APPLI CATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since thislis'a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of opplication(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION • NAME FEES Curtis Beattie & Assoc. Arrhitartc Q REZONE*(FRCOM TO ) ADDRESS . 100 W. Harrison Plaza Suite 220 d SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle, Washington 98119 ��—{ DITIONAL USE PERMIT* ' TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL -'(S vo SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL (206) 282-8512 U No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON • Q VARIANCE* From Section: • NAME ` * Justification Required Scott Douglas ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: same as above ® SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP TENTATIVE PLAT PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 0 WAIVER (Justification'Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: • NAME PLAT NAME: E & H Properties ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: P.O. Box 598 [] PRELIMINARY . CITY ZIP Q FINAL. Bellevue, Washington 98009 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE . Residential 0 Industrial 0 Commercial Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS 700 S.W. 7th ED TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING © PRELIMINARY ED FINAL Undeveloped MP , ' • PROPOSED USE •, -- ' '• '• PARK NAME: Parking NUMBER OF SPACES: [E] ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW;SCOMMITTEE —1 7 SQ. FT. - ACRES . ,. AREA: . TOTAL FEES �� site - 97,496 sf 2.24 ^531r` 1_ y.�,,,$.T1AFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE D `�%> 44 r E, APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: (9.B �I APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: J U L 15 1986 t: J Accepted U Incomplete Notification Sent On By: � {} (Initials) DATE OINPG /LUNING DEPT. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ' S. -- \I. .---. 71-12 0 Accepted CDIncomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: 4 Building [4 Design Eng. ® Fire Parks I KJ Police JEJ Policy Dev. CE) Traffic Eng. 0 Utilities • REVISED 1-31—RA Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). That portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 18, T 23 N, R 5 E, W.M., in King County, Washington, Described as follows: Commencing at the SW corner of said section 18: thence S 89 10' 18" E along the south line of said Sectian 18_. a distance of 275.74 feet to the southerly projection of the west line of a parcel deeded to Geo.. A. Hormel and Eopany by deed recorded under King County recording No. 7305240389; thence. N 00 49' 42' E along said southerly projection 40.00 feet to the SW corner of said parcel and the true point of beginning, said point being on the north margin SW 7th Street; thence continuing N 00 49' 42" F along the west line of said parcel 464.54 feet to a point on a 363.06'radius curve concave to the southeast, a radial at said point bearing S 15 37' 21" E; thence southwesterly along said curve an arc distance of 340.46 feet; thence S 01 14' 35" W 151.88 feet to said north margin of SW 7t4 Street: thence S 89 10' 18" E along north said north margin 259.60 feet to the true point of beginning; AFFIDAVIT I, L CV 4,(/' 7 162 ' , being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,IZadvner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SW .R I TO BEFORE ME THIS lDl DAY 19 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT (Name of Notary Public) ( nature of Owner) )/ tg,7 /047 14g 44-1-- (A.dress) (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 1111r-4' • I 'legal Description (cont.) As shown in short plat 37-77, City Of Renton, recorded March 24, 1977, under recording No. 7703240654. Subject to the following easements: A.F. 5930700, for pipelines (unlocatable) :It y . ,. c : 1 Y 'r CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: 7OO f3141 K e. [T NG- APPLICANT: C u �:S I3e.Q (!!e. 4 ASS vc . i 4ec 47/gG/S(6e*Ne. /rive+ c IV APPLICATION NUMBER: The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ,6O ,e/4/ .,104:14 ,c .A6eZ67- 9/age; oa/0-03 Y 30 O�i�e/>7 .6 t '�'K i�l1Y SL1T1` ,s-aav /Yv/9t c .w62Ia2 gee'ae f 6e'a ,F 60e/YJc�2, -74 Gl .0, go< dOO /8d 2.9s"—`,o?.S 4,.-02 pci4 roil( MI/ 'sgf.2 C8 i Y OF REN Q Oa$ D FE (C,'-', E. El V El � JUL 151986 j k BUILDING / ZOM1 G DEPT. • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER II it + ASSESSOR'S NAME 'ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I, - hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their a dre ses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public. in for the State of Washington residing, at • on the !D day of 6 SIGNED: CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on . to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to,before me. a ' Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of SIGNED: FORM 20B • , • 4,� ECF: I do`1_.�� LU: -0-19 tb z City Rentono • 9$9�r ��:�� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST • • fp SEP'rE •• Purpose of Checklist:. The State Environmental. Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCN. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental "impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse"impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. • Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks yoy to describe some basic information about. your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the • environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the .questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately. and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the 'need, to hire experts. If you really do not know, the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does .not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. \The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them' bver a period of time .or' on different parcels of land. Attach any additional • information that will . help describe your proposal or :its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,'complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). - For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read:as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area."respectively. A. 'BACKGROUND ' ,'1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:'" • N/A OF- i T�1 . e�,.= ,��Tt:;�s'`� 2.. Name of applicant: I. �`_, �:� F��F. Curtis' Beattie & Associates Architects ' Il 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact .person: pl 1.5 198 , ) 100 West Harrison Plaza Suite 220 Seattle, Washington 98119 BUIL.€}IPjG i 7ONlNC e PT Contact Person: Scott Douglas • 4. Date checklist prepared: June 20, 1986 5. . Agency requesting checklist: City Of Renton • 6. 'Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): August" 1986 7. Do you have any plans for future. additions,'expansions, L. ,urther activity related • to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. ti Possible future expansion of 34 stalls to the west. • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your,proposal? If yes, explain. No 10. 'List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. None • 11. Give brief, complete description-of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size'of the project and site.. :There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. • • We are proposing to put in 184 parking stalls on the 2.24 acre site. Perimeter and interior landscaping, as well as the storm drainage system, to be installed per City of Renton standards. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address; if any, and section, township, ,and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map; and topography map, if reasonably. available.' While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not' required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit. applications related to this checklist. An undeveloped site located at 700 S.W. 7th St. ' B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH - a. General description of the site. (circle 'one)i' 51P rolling, h{lly, steep slopes, mountainous, other s b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? N.A. c. , What general types' of soil's are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the 'classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.• 0 N/A • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate. vicinity? If so, describe. No • - 2 - ' any Describe the purpose. type, and approximate quantities of filling or grading proposed.` Indicate source of fill. Nominal filling associated with grading. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction, or use? If so, generally describe. • No ; .. g.- About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 65/ h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None 2. 1�1IR a. What types of emissions:to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities,if known. During grating: grading equipment and some dust. After completion: automobile .emmisions. b. Are there any'off-site sources of emission? Train exhaust c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • None 3. ' WATER • a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity, of the site (including year-round artd seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, ;describe type and provide names: If appropriate. state what stream or river it flows into. • I It ! None 1% '6 2) Will the project require any work over, in,:or 'adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No • •. 3) ' Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A • - 3 - • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawais or diversions? Give •. • 1 , general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. •• \ No S• Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.: • No 6) Does the proposal. involve any discharges of waste materials to .surface waters? If so, describe the type, of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. • - No ' b. Ground: • 1) ' Will ground water be withdrawn,, or will water be discharged to ground _ • water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. . ' , • . . No ' 2) ' 'Describe waste 'material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the. following chemicals . . .;' agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the = number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c, Water Runoff (including storm water): ' • 1) Describe the source 'of. runoff (including 'storm water) and method of ' collection and disposal, if.'any (include quantities, if known). Where.will this water.flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.: The source of .the water runoff is from the paved surface. areas'., ,r Il I I ! �I 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally. describe. : \ No . \ .. • - - 4 _ • I,% , . • • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground. and runoff water impacts, if any: On site detention as required by the City of Renton 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar. pine, other J Shrubs grass o crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage. other o water plants: water lily, eel grass. milfoil. other • o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The entire site will be graded. in preparation for the construction of parking stalls. New landscaping will be Installed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None . d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures ito preserve or enhance vegetation on the site. if any: None during 'grading. 5. . Animals a. Circle any birds arid animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle songbirr other i Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. t i None c. Is'the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No . � 1 _ 5 _ j , L , • • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: • None I • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds,of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Nominal electrical energy for lighting • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. 'What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of_this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control, energy impacts,:if any: ! ; None 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. - i , Some dust may ruse due to grading. Streets will be cleaned as required. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. ,1 r j I None • it I 2) Proposed. measures to reduce or control environmental 'health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1) ' What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project. (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None • - 6 - i i ; 12• 2) ' What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation,, other)? Indicate what hours noise would• come from the site. Grading. equipment 'noise during grading. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if-any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a.' What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is vacant at present. Adjacent' site.s are also vacant except for the site,to.the east which has an office/light industrial development. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. .. c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. . Will.any structures be demolished? If so, what? N/A e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? M-P f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? M-P i g. ' If applicable, what. is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? I;' i N/A i h. Has any part of. the site been classified as an "environmentally' Sensitive". area? If so, specify. No • . i. Approximately how many people would ,reside or work in thecompleted project? ' ' . N/A j. ' ' Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A - 7 - • " " 1. Proposed measures to, ensure the proposal;is compatible with existing and • • _ projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing i a. Approximately, how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,.middle, or low-income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any,,, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is' the.'tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including • antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. N/q b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: .. None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal ,produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? f N/A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? • None do Proposed measures'to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if.any: N/A • - 8 - 1 • 1 2: Recreation. a. - What designated and informal recreational, opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? N/A b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, \. , describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any: N/A 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed 'for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe'any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance,known to be on or next to,the site. None c. Proposed measures'to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation i . a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any. Access to the site will be from S.W. 7th St. b. Is site currently served by public transit? 'If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A c. How many parking spaces would the completed.project. have? !How many would the project a iminate? New parking stalls: 184 I ! I Displaced parking stalls: 0 I . ' i ; " d. Will the'proposal require any new roads 'or streets.. or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe . . (indicate,whether public or private). N/A • • - 9 - e. Will the.projdut use (or occur in the immediate vluinity of) water, rail, or •. • air transportation? If so, generally describe. • • A railroad track spur is existing near. the west property line. It will not be used in this project, however. f. How many vehicular'trips per day would be generated by the completed project?. If known,'indicate when.peak volumes would occur. Accessary parking for the. IBM/Collins Building. Minimal 'in .and out traffic. g. ' Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. . Public Services a. Would the project, result in an increased need for public services (for example: 'fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. ' No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. ' Utilities • a. Circle utilities currently available 'at the site: _electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.. b. ' Describe the' utilities that. are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and 'the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. 1- Electricity for nominal site lighting 2- Water for landscape irrigation . _ 3- Storm sewer for site drainage ',' C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it_might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. / ; • Proponent: e Name Printed: (iii27 5 L_ • - 10 - #176 11-8-84 /% • .D: SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) . Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be, aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. > 1. How would, the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish,or marine life are: 3: How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. . How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated. (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or, endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or.to avoid or reduce impacis are: I • - 11 - . I ' • 5. How would the proposal 'be'• likely to affect land and b... reline use, including • ' whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: • 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? ' . . I Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: • • 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is ! understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in•reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on, my part. • ' Proponent: Name Printed: • I Fl it I I Ii �ii fi !I ' ' •• • • i • 12 - i , �. ENDING. offr OF FILE FILE TITLE 341d 0 I / ' , $AO1986