Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA77-018 • .'..6`6?-01, . ,..'.•:',-•:...--•," :,,,;-:,..',,,:.....,--,• -•.•,:,-,.';-•--.'. ,-•.....--.'•:. . •, \:. , - ..`"\0 • .• \ , ', •--. -''''-'•'-\ •4-'••••;.•-..;.(/t--,•-•.,:',.'.'-;',-:-.":-,, .,.... ,., , • = . -1 xVkL\. • \..,,, •\,•`!•4 \•' '''' '.:•••:-';'''"-:...:-..1-,,...., ''''' -. \ LE'92£00p9.1 3 •.. , :, . , • .''' ....' ..,s.'\,\- \--,\;::-.17,,,.5'..7:-...::--.,, • - it \ '''''- ' '. ' '•\ \ '''N:\•.- • : • \ \ • I � 1\\• \, 1 `£I , - \ 'ax \ :.,-,:ie • 00`Z61 N I 8: \1 y+\\. - 7.-,-,.:.-=',... ---$:.'• 0\ , ‘ . ,kC. , LD _ " \'..\ v\\ \ 11 f I:- L1 �.: .. I: '- �' 1 I1 Ilj[ tr.:;1: 10111 - 1S'arHl.'.::ft-6 ;';3Sr 99,+1 Ij 0;x -— . 1S • . a ;£§:L: .-3.5. �• 1• mlI �I Icll- . S 'Q ' ' °� i I • ___. ./. % • • ./. . . ' -.,:,- 1' . '''.- ,'-',:•...''.:i'.--,-.,:*! , ...'.--":.,:-.-1; '''•-":;;::-- --:/f.-'-'''. .--,• - • gi li 'IF ,. , 1 ,o . i . �� % III'....z,-...41 . I/ . . / „ . . , ' ®. _�. ••^_. ,RECEIVED • I" w. ..: ..3 ,,. ' CITY OF ENTO 1' I ■ ;;- _ . _"' HEARING MINER r ! Q', , , , , ..,:::: a "i: j • PM• I- i `, AN1 �,,, ':3�415I6 _ X 19 \ ' . / '4 - . ITEM NO 4 o /g- 7 in ,:'• m° 1eob t•�• \ !! 1„ ,. I '" L- - - 7 1_ Lr 1 t (Y e 4-\ 4 ,, 1:4_if- ---- .." - -' ''./ '''......^':,..:1-. . - 's.. :;NI 4,44.9. l' . d. 71. • 0 ..., f ` Y 0 - ^ 1 % I C"74 l \ f J - % • ' -------- st 47 � ! 1 111 1 ., �/ -' si a tit --•,;.?,. qi 4\ 4;44\7: /�/ /�- . f R L + -., ` _7 1_.. C`R"1 i 1 c`. - • .,, ---- .„. ..,. ...,._, \________.._______. ,, \ . -,' - .,.. ). , \ ,, . --74A v1 /� w ?8 b1 , 1 I�C '� ‘ s S1 • '.yam 1`,.. rgr s�4'.", --c,tip. /_...,• r . ,,, \ r \rf Zs. i , e' � e r5r,.y ;ter 44 r y :• /.v�°• L `� i \ era to ,, 'ri ` + 'L„-/ �647 / ' Sr'f' I. 1 �, r j /o t ,,/� 1 \ ,v 1, • '/L%',;; mil/ / It a \ \ 7 '�, ,... ; .1 \ / A- t 777: V ' a 1`.. — - `� E 1 . •',""' \ • \ AD '--..--. -2. 3 - 5 ,: . RECEIVED 1 \ \CITY OF RENTON /�0 1 ,c4(i HEARING EXA Mi,'.ft ;` o ...- MA21 51977 - AM PM a - "4 718,910111,121112z 3,41516iA 2 _ �'�/� Q�,P Di,„. /R, 7 ,-D / :77. ,� M NO -T�- •E•.I'- . Sw. 41, b..Ri,:' '4•., • - ,'' .i •..t•.,. A,•1 -7 1`` .,.; `I`'ro itz,-.!v $. '':...,,,, :. ,t.. ' .:: t'h"S;;i i4 •v"r to t�.;,,t .:l I l:'l'; 'i LOT .., IA SI* • i � 59 4 .� — -- --- -- • SAVOY I / —, as o / .- - - RESIDENCE - - - -- 3� • 1 , _ -PRPE2.lY RI`.s►D i CF t' PAVED AT--PRFSEMT 17' PRESENT z OVERALL EASEMENT po5 i • n 4—PRESENT -- - / / :.-1 fa S-. ---- — \u • i• —Si' �js GARAGE - \ / / 1 3'EASEMENT 62 r . Mo2Rt�N • r; RESIDENCE �. 63 4 . \ � -\8$ ' ‘,. r ....., • FbST ., '/ L V _..1 ill 64- �� NpEW HOUSE '• • `, i GREEN. r i RESIDENCE ter- ----- — i �� ill -- �� MNCE?.1HALL / • is II7E1�J�E �J i to 7 Olit.. . . , __ .0 .0410hi, i s C t I.5ti IA 1414 i I. • SALE- IN-$O' • RECEIVED . CITY OF RENTON NO ® 'SHORT PLATHEARING EXAMINER WEST 188' LOTS S1Y.T!T4\10062) 4 SIXTY-1 HREC63), MAR 1 5 197 7 PM 3,� • BLOCK ''R, HI L_LMAN's LAKE \A./RSE-11NG70t.1 GARDEN" OF EDEN ADDTTIO1 TLD SEATtLE. I lo. I P•=R.D1t�1G AM • TO PLR-r Ti-IERt fZECORDD IN \iOLLIME 1 1 718191tOi11tzi i2i8,4I5►6 • ` uk® of PLA1 ,PAG_.G-6, RE�RDS OF r 1D coutCEy ".Ni '- `III I ( Heft \N ITH SAD CLASS 51}C 2F�1t�1D5 #- - P.WOIN ING, A5 ESTAgUSHED BY DECREE_ _. t/ � ) , X TB� �. ENTERED OC1Z'DBE-SZ19,1923 1N1 KAK1G MUNN .- c - 5UPb(Z JJ T C ..lsE 1O.. 11563'7 1. -- ITEM NO. - oi9-7� . E )NIT I �Mt -- • 1XYON (GIN3, s ( •e''.: 4•4 i• ",, >.. --' - "','-: .t ..'" - rye .,, :,J. h.V•. i. •� .6 �r-1i- _-.'.1.. •7 - _ .. • 9 W" -A'` .1+ "nar - y ira r•' -r ti Ty 3S f f ' 1• .\ \ , . . -- A , -'• . \ \ - - .• - ‘. el' ' 7' ''Sfr . - . \. 1\ °\ ', i- 1 \'; . - k / \ w \ \ \ / . \ \ � W az 'tic it t �I s. • �� \\ •f�� \ : ') 0 `f :mac • \ \ 1 . .' 1 \.! \ ; I `G3 r T� \ \ \ ('J r'` • 4 \ it \\ ::\....'\ \.,7**/..,,:- Alc•.-,47 cc.,ne.'„ a f $40 r . '''' ,..-7-.--.:17-1-1- V 1 ' ' \ O ` \ \ r, \ \ , \ . • 7._ t•1. t • 70 .• ; •,oV. ., . ,, - ijer'•V,. • - i ` • .-- , '� w ..././".\.A./.‘(:C9. ., -: • .. , .\ • _� ov / \ �w`Ot . - I - 1 ,. 4 -.;<-...,.. , i 7-'.t ci / T N\D' 4C \ i .1 !( 1 4 „�Y f Q ^ w i 1 i !-rr�1� v Y ll ! ({ 1^ Ii 1J1 { ? f Y ` ,\ rp. , < _ f i ; "�-i -- - �_7-y�� j"./ "1*-4i--r.---�.. ±n ?' -�j --4-..i l •`� y_ `;`j l:`` i i ., ?i', 4 i_l'-1L-1 z \"\I, .1 \\\ .. • \\ ae 1. .'.- -,I-:" • --------b---------- -....---__....... ..:....„" ''`,:•--,,.... ,_ : "..* "7...- I%.'i 1 --11:-. 4(510—• :, ;a...! . , . . �' \ .A``'\ 'tr. ` t• j `' +e p�(. 4 , 'V$4 rIi! 1 4' "17 • A j+ S► v s.E. !�+. - y , ,a r�tj`- o '`zD .H 1 3 50 !� � ,r '' ' :-. n •/ ..., • _ ‘ • - - I il ..2.....1.___------- aye,- , ..-/.. .--• / , sr i , - . 0 C <2' ..4‘I 35,---j / ....' .0"/„(//". il,'.4- • • ' ' 0 --.......__ • . .,- r i 0-, , - 1 . I 0, ew _ oi , 1, .._ , . ,,...'' e a‘ .' $ . l4 P•A '4 0 47/7/ '° OaNC,I\-4 4• St" r \N ., -.N. ..,.- . . 6.,-- . -...--........ .4% \\;... r .., - I\.1 N 1. , N Y ,,.- , ' . , . gr'‘. '. "" ....... -' 41. t.'( . -!,(2". , '-•,. . .1 •,!' ,..... ••a•..•-) _ • • 6•,..... , 4 \ '... I :;'-"''' .4•'::sit S .... " •A. N .1 ... ' ‘ e, ...-'4:" - e- \ 4.-- ‘,..0 ' • . . -I* — r • _ ,, -,,., , . \ ... , . ,... v .,„ ... 1 cr% i . (\J .. .,'-' 1, 4 . el , . ....„---r-• 1, r- . --r• , , . . . ., .-.,, , . . . . •u • - - - ---7-' - . .. .d... . '. NI 1 _ • .. 1 .. ! %.1 i r*r/ i T- " I : "' 7,;,73 .‘`P., . i'''''' do, ‘ \ I\ .. .„,. ,... '---....--7.--:"..........-'-'-..- •----- -.4 A. I .'s-1 3 1 A . , - , - \ I iz. ,.- - •• r -.------:-.--T-7-1-..- . or • - .., \ • . . ;._ . . - .... • ,..ti v i..,•,_.7. . 1 E . 17c-r-r--_: •---- -1 . ,x II ! . co• a .,.; iii,e, -,4: ' r% ! .1., -- 0 / f, I---- I -- ....r... „its 1 .... i . . ...... ,/ . ..A...." 41'. !--W.I- In • Rill La ,3 1) i 4, , . N...., . ,,, . . i 1 , ..._.-' i .. ! ..<._;::: .fr'fr. ! ! I ...,"( .. f '-/ \ ic,c 1 -- 1 \ . ' ,`..'',' 1 i /11 ,..... _-- - \ \ 1 I • • i •..,- -> -----1.--.L„. ^ - \ • . r. ."•• , -. ,: cri,.!-••1 .- 1 \ \ -i\ .4.‘ , 's • \ ' 1 - / • -. ..., _••• . 1 .•• 4•••-•''....•1 . •. ' '\• •. . tx‘• ...1 N \ • ....A, t5'*-1 •' L --•-.1 ..2• - , 1 ". ' ., ., .-• ek, : - 1 =. ' - 1 - I. ....1 . is.. . i • -a \ .\ \ • •14' I:\ \ • I. f1 i" --. -. ••• .1 •i'..r!-Z'• • _,. i ,. .1 : /4' a. \ . ..,./,' 1 / e''''''s, . , \....;,\ X, -t\\*A •.. 01 Ven Z''. _. \ .,....., • - ..' ... . /• •.-- ..4`; - s-gt\, 'I\' -..—• ii,,\ . .• \ ... .„ , . \ \ \ \ •k.-:-N‘ ss \ \ ' • , ,. ‘ _t.4 4,c_ :• ' ‘ ' \ 1 . . • . \ \ . \ . \ k la.-.1,... ../.1.1,•, \ , • ' L tol \ .. • i 41 : • ...' .‘•1,r-, ! •y , \.,, :\ •.-1 i \ . Or'l • \ \ .\ , • , / 5 t I ./ N.i (- 's \ • if.• . '''.. 7.•• . . 1 \ / 7 \ 1 . \ • Ate. 17. ! . . • ''. ,X • •••- \ \ \/dr . ' \ \ \, / i ..., ..!' \, , r , , \ _ \. \ \ , e,. \ I\ • \ \ \ , • \\ \ -,3 A Nit • , N • i IN`44-3a 111///1/ .1--. \ . )c . \ ti. ..- . .i ./..„..+' _, • .‘...„, \ 1 \ \\ • 7-So I: \\\);\7 \ ,; ts \ ff„ ././ ..I ........„.....,... __ ....0.... ,-. 1 , ..-. e• :1 • • \ \ la, ,,,, • t ., .... ••.. } \ \ \ • •(--"" ... -0. C, 's• i I Ai*. ./,././ i LL6I 91 833 i.A ri 1 ......\\" , V \ \ \ \ #7 i 1 . ti. . li° II' - .......,___ -, ............-> , , , \ 0 g] , N1 ..., -. \ . -•1A1A. .., '.. • ... . . . , , - - ,.• . ,.. _:,. , ..---„ - .1 . . ...... . ... . . •7 - ' -.. ,...e.•11, .• i . : y ,,.. t%i , . 0 - .+.4 ' • ..4•Vii,''','',..,•_ ,_ ,. f -. V . . -- ' ' '.• ' ''' -•..-;•7•s;'•:t'''''',''''''''.'',.- ,:• - • i ••s.....' . BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TI / IBVlrt (1 � OI877 0ROFI`MED I. ii. • F R`'`'�= • NOTICE OF ' O F/ PUBLIC HEARING v'` •RENTON LAND USE- ', �r/� Pr' ,0i RENTONWASHNGTON ' Affidavit of Publican anJ' A PUBLIC' HEARING �9 1 ��! WILL BE HELD BY THE i .RENTON- LAND USE STATE OF WASHINGTON .fl HEARING EXAMINER.AT • COUNTY OF KING ss. �C HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAM- /L,G •<. - BERS, CITY- HALL, RE- `� //� / ,""NTON,WASHINGTON,ON � V Q D EP A, MARCH-15,.1977, AT 9:90 t3'8x'i9ax t1 C amp aig na being first duly sworn on A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING'PETITIONS::. ' : 1. APPLICATION•FOR . oath,deposes and says that z.h.e..is the e.t.a e.f...C.i.erk of. TWO LOT SHORT ,j THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) P�1 APPROVAL; times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and _te IV_ g-7 i, has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred property• o in " to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- View ty Aveof. N3 No. Mt. ". paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, View o. and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained 2: APPLICATION,FORS: at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton • EXCEPTION TO" Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the • SUBDIVISION OR= t Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, • DINANCE; file Nor'' r E-019-77;• property., ' located in vicinity of Washington.That the annexed is a 11Q.t.i.C.e...Q.£...Pl.bij.c 3011 Mt:biewAve. y' No.'. • N Bearing :3. WAIVER" OF•OFF= • SITE IMPROVE- : MENTS FOR TWO as it was published in regular issues(and LOT SHORT PLAT;- not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period file No. W-020-77; • . property located in.•' vicinity of 3011 Mt. View Ave. No. of o 11 a consecutive issues,commencing on the 4.. REZONE FROM G- • 6000 TO R-3;file No. • • .t day of t?arch 7� , '' R-022-77; property. y ,19 ,and ending the •. located:between Lake Washington. • • • and Ripley _Lane day of 19 both dates " North adjacent to- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- •and north of-e Misty scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Cove• Ap . • 5. SITETE APPROVAL IN ' M-P"ZONE; file No.. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..32...90 vhich SA-021-77;property has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the located on north side first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent of S.W.7th.St.west• insertion. 7 .-, of Hormel Co.facility. , � and east.of the Ear-. ` �-x CCc1r.., / r . lington Golf.Course" /&-/-1� act:x.fit/ and railroad ,spur : , (I u� -track:-: :;_:, •• ", . Legal descriptions of ap- ' plications noted.above on file in Renton Planning De-.'i Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4 th day of • partment. • ALL INTERESTED PER- • . SONS TO SAID PETITIONS =les&all 19....7.7 ARE INVITED TO BE PRE' • SENT AT.THE PUBLIC,: HEARING ON MARCH 15,'-1 .Z9 ;(--6'' � 1077 AT 9:00'A.M.Td EX- Notary Public; and for the State ofJ ngton, PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. residing at Kent, g County. GORDON Y. NE __ _ - PLANNING • .DIRECTOR Published In The Renton —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June Record-Chronicle March 4, 9th, 1955." 1977.R4224 —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. S11/ .► n o THE CITY OF RENTON `® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 op .JL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0� JAMES L. MAGSTADT 235 - 2 593 qTF� SEP1t. April 6 , 1977 Mr. & Mrs. Gary A. Greene RE: File No. Short Plat #018-77 4648-89th Avenue S.E. Exception #019-77 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Waiver #020-77 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Greene : • This is to notify you that the above referenced requests which were denied as noted on the Examiner' s report of March 21, 1977 , have not been appealed within the time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Sincerely, James Li/Magstadt Hearing Examiner JLM:mg cc: . `Del Mead, City Clerk • March 21 , 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE NEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION . APPLICANT: Gary A. Greene FILE NO. Short Plat #018-77 Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 LOCATION: Vicinity of 3011 Mountain View Avenue North. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a two-lot short plat, together with an exception from the Subdivision Ordinance to allow the short plat with a 20 foot private easement to the proposed interior lot, and a waiver from the off-site improvement ordinance. SUMMARY OF Planning Department : Approval of short plat and RECOMMENDATION: exception with conditions; denial of waiver request & granting an indefinite deferral. Hearing Examiner: Denial. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 8 , 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on March 15, 1977 , at 9 : 00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1 , and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Assessor ' s Map. Exhibit #3 : Detailed Site Plan, Proposal of Lot Separation. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith when the short plat request was submitted. Mr. Smith indicated he did not have the exact date , but the applicant would supply this information during his testimony. The Examiner inquired about the width of the proposed easement , and Mr. Smith responded that the easement would be 17 feet in width with a proposal to extend the area to 20 feet by utilizing 3 feet of the subject site and expand the paving to 15-16 feet. He reported that the present paved portion is 9 feet in width. MIMMQV Short Plat #018-77 Page Two Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 The Examiner noted that the applicant had submitted three applications and requested Mr. Smith to summarize them together, but that they would be reviewed separately by the Examiner. Mr. Smith read a letter which had been submitted to the Planning Department by the applicant on February 10 , 1977 , regarding exception to short plat off an easement. The Examiner requested. clarification on the map regarding a turnaround provision from the requested easement, which Mr. Smith subsequently described. The Examiner asked if Mr. Smith had additional exhibits or information to present. Mr. Smith indicated that he had no further comments at that time. The Examiner asked Mr. Greene, the applicant, if he concurred in the Planning Department report. Mr. Greene indicated concurrence but asked to comment on the report. Speaking was: Gary A. Greene 4648 89th Avenue S.E. Mercer Island, WA 98040 Mr. Greene reported that in response to the Examiner' s inquiry, the property to the north was short platted ten to fifteen years ago. In regard to the turnaround, Mr. Greene indicated that a turnaround was possible and would be incorporated into the final design plan. The applicant stated that he would be willing to answer any further questions. The Examiner asked for additional testimony in favor of the application. Responding was: Bev G. Morrison 3011 Mountain View Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Morrison briefly summarized the history of acquisition of the property and indicated that Lot B, which contains 10,500 square feet, had been deeded to his son-in-law, Mr. Greene. He stated .that the proposed structure would not interfere with the value of neighboring property and. was hopeful that the request would not cause dissension in the neighborhood. The Examiner asked for testimony in opposition to the application. Responding was: William I. Mendenhall 3007 Mountain View Avenue N. P.O. Box 357 Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Mendenhall reported that he resides to the south of Mr. Morrison and had spoken with Mr. Greene on March 14 regarding the proposed construction. He indicated he was opposed to the request for the following reasons : 1) A verbal agreement was made by neighbors at the time of original purchase and construction of homes to place structures in a line to prevent the obstruction of views. However, some owners had broken the agreement during sale of homes; 2) Building a residence in front of his home would not increase the value of the property, and he objected to problems of drainage and obstruction of lake view; 3) Mr. Mendenhall' s residence would face directly towards the proposed residence because of the existing dogleg in the land; and 4) He did not wish to develop his property, and the development would entail negotiating with the abutting neighbor, Mr. Shane, for an easement access. Mr. Mendenhall briefly reviewed the history of acquisition of the property and expressed the desire to maintain a good relationship with his neighbors, but felt the need to conform to the original verbal agreement. 1111 4110 Short Plat #018-77 Page Three Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 The Examiner inquired about the agreement. Mr. Mendenhall indicated that it was verbal, not written, but felt it was a moral, binding agreement. The Examiner reported that the Planning Department had indicated a concern regarding obstruction of views , and asked Mr. Mendenhall if the proposed low profile structure was limited to a maximum height of 15-18 feet, would it obstruct his view of the lake. Mr. Mendenhall responded that a new home would obstruct his view and expressed the concern that a precedent would be set which would increase the density of the area and obstruct views from existing residences. The Examiner asked Mr. Mendenhall if the structure could be placed on any area of the lot which would not impair the view. Mr. Mendenhall reported that the property is level from front to back and because of the dogleg, construction of a home on any area of the property would impair the view. The Examiner indicated that stipulations of the request would include submitting a site plan and elevation plan of the proposed building which would require approval by the Planning Department and the adjacent property owners. Mr. Mendenhall stated that' he would contact an attorney regarding his legal rights in the matter, and indicated he would require more time to investigate all aspects of the proposal. The Examiner stated that he would desire to leave all options open in the matter and asked if Mr. Mendenhall would consider any extenuating circumstances. Mr. Mendenhall indicated his opposition and requested reservations for future action. The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition to the request. Responding was : Charles Shane 3003 Mountain View Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Shane stated that should Mr. Mendenhall develop his property in the same way as the applicant' s proposal , it would create a similar view-obstructing situation from his residence . He reported that purchase of his home had been made because of the desirability of owning lake front property, and felt that construction of homes on the lake front portion of the lot changed this aspect. He spoke regarding the height of the road which is approximately 16 feet above the water level and the proposed structure which would be limited to 15-18 feet, and reported that homeowners in the area had broken the verbal agreement to a certain extent with construction of boathouses and second story additions, and expressed the apprehension that the verbal agreement would be further broken if homes were sold to new owners . The Examiner asked Mr. Shane if he had considered dividing his property and Mr. Shane indicated that he had not. The Examiner asked Mr. Shane if restricting the height of the building to 18 feet would obstruct the view. Mr. Shane indicated that it would be obstructive because of the view of the roof. The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition: There was none. The Examiner asked Mr. Greene if he had further comments in rebuttal. Mr. Greene submitted two additional exhibits: Exhibit #4 : Elevation Map of Property. Exhibit #5 : Site Plan with Trees Designated. He explained that the elevation map illustrated the grade from a north/south point of view and shows no difference between the grade of the Mendenhall property and the subject property, but if one stands on the property, the Mendenhall property has a slightly higher elevation than is shown on the map. He indicated that the verbal agreement had been broken by the construction of a structure on the Burr property which has been subdivided. He reported that drainage . S ili) Short P1 #018-77 Page Four Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 tiles would be installed on the subject property and felt that the size of the lot of 10 ,500 square feet prevented a crowded appearance. He stated that he had agreed to restrictive covenants limiting the height of the structure to 15-18 feet. The applicant explained Exhibit #5 , which illustrates a number of large trees including three large willow trees on the Mendenhall property, one in excess of 75 feet, which he felt were an obstruction of the view. He indicated that the Burr residence was 20 feet in height, but did not obstruct the view from the Morrison residence. With respect to the elevation, he stated the property is flat, but increases in height on a crest where existing two-story residences have been placed. The Examiner asked the applicant about the contemplated design of the structure. Mr. Greene responded that he did not plan a flat level house, but would 'construct a one-story home with a moderate pitched roof within the height limitation including the chimney. He indicated there would be no second addition. The Examiner suggested continuing the hearing in order to allow the applicant time to contact an architect or have' a detailed elevation plan prepared. Mr. Greene indicated his concurrence and stated that he had agreed to everything the Planning Department imposed in every respect. He reported that he had contacted the King County Assessor' s office to investigate property values from a tax point of view and that the new structure would not increase or decrease property values in any way. The Examiner asked if the applicant would be willing to have an architectural site plan and elevation plan prepared even if the request may be eventually denied or approved. Mr. Greene indicated his willingness to prepare the necessary plans. Mr. Morrison stated that the greatest problem with existing lake views is the presence of large trees on the Mendenhall property, and felt that the trees could be cut if the issue were the maintenance of the view. The Examiner asked Mr. Morrison if he had trees on his property and Mr. Morrison responded that one large tree exists on Lot B, and it is the intent of the applicant to top the tree. Mr. Morrison reported that a certain amount of construction had been accomplished for houses , additions, boat and bath houses , and felt that the original verbal agreement had been broken between the four homeowners in the area and was no longer valid. Mr. Smith commented that the Planning Department staff reports are prepared without contact with abutting neighbors, and felt that to be fair to all residents , site and elevation plans should be prepared to increase awareness of significant impact on existing views', and that the Planning Department would recommend that this be accomplished. He indicated that restrictions on the property would be in the form of covenants with the land, site storm water retention facilities , and that the Planning Department would not recommend approval of a condition that will detract from the view. The Examiner asked Mr. Mendenhall if these suggestions were agreeable to him. Mr. Mendenhall stated that regarding the previous discussion about view-obstructing trees, that trees are natural objects and can be removed, but houses are permanent structures and cannot be removed. The Examiner directed the comment to Mr. Mendenhall that if he were opposed to any type of construction, the Examiner would be causing needless delay to continue the hearing in order to allow preparation of the pertinent maps and plans and asked Mr. Mendenhall if he would want to hold his final decision until review of such plans. Mr. Mendenhall restated that he was opposed to construction, that he may consider development of the property at some future time, but not at the present time. The Examiner summarized the application and noted that his job is not always an easy one, and he makes every attempt when possible to arbitrate between supporting and opposing parties. He stated that both property owners have certain rights, that he would review all comments and arguments for and against the application, consider the rights of both parties and reach his conclusion. The hearing on Item #018-77 , #019-77 , and #020-77 was closed by the Examiner at 10 :20 a.m. Short Plat #018-77 Page Five Exception #019-77 .. Waiver #020-77 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1. Mr. Greene, the applicant, requests approval of a two lot short plat together with an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow the short plat with a 20 foot easement to the proposed interior lot. A waiver of off-site improvements is also being requested. 2 . It is the proposal of Mr. Greene to construct a single family residence on the west one-half of the Morrison property. This has been designated as Lot B on Exhibit #3 . Lot B is approximately 10, 500 square feet in area and will access to Mountain View Ave. N. via a 20 foot easement located on the north portion of the property and shared by the Burr residence. 3. The existing zoning in this area is G-6000, minimum lot size 6 ,000 square feet. The proposed short plat would be in excess of the minimum requirement for square footage. This area is known as Coleman Point and consists of approximately four homes with lots in excess of 300 feet in depth. The Morrison home is in line with the Savoy residence built to the north, the Mendenhall residence built to the south, and the Shane residence also located to the south. These homes are all located approximately 20 to 35 feet from Mountain View Avenue N. and have front yards in excess of 200 feet. 4 . The Savoy property to the north has a residence constructed on the west one-half, now known as the Burr residence. This residence was formerly a boat house that was remodeled into a cottage and then converted to a residence approximately 10 to 15 years ago. This residence was constructed prior to adoption of a short plat ordinance. 5. Mr. Greene indicated that he proposes to build a single family residence that would not exceed a height of 15-18 feet and would be willing to submit plans and profiles illustrating his proposed residence. 6 . The four homes in this area were apparently built with similar setbacks to maintain an unobstructed view of the lake. Construction of these homes was followed by a verbal agreement made by the neighbors to prevent the obstruction of adjacent views. The. Savoy residence to the north was sold and a subsequent building was constructed on the west one-half which violated the intent of the verbal agreement. Adjacent property owners are concerned about the effect the proposed structure will have on their lake views. It was noted that there are several large willow trees located on the western edge of the property which create an obstruction to the view. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . These homes in the Coleman Point area have all been built on lake front property with considerable depth that has a virtually unobstructed view of Lake Washington and Mercer Island. The homes are similar in character and architecture and maintain similar open space areas. 2 . This open space has been violated by the construction of the Burr residence located to the north. There was apparent opposition to the construction of this building since it violated a verbal agreement by the four adjacent property owners . 3 . Construction of additional residences in the front yard areas would change the character of this residential area and would in effect double the density. 1 Short Plat #018-77 Page Six Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 4 . Several property owners to the north of the applicant' s property oppose the construction of a single family residence on the Morrison property. 5. These property owners with the exception of the Savoy residence have resided in this area for a considerable amount of time and have certain property rights inherent in the purchase of their residence. 6. Changing the character of this area by short platting should not be allowed if there is opposition from adjacent property owners . 7 . Efforts to reach a compromise in the hearing process between supporting and opposing parties were not successful in that the opposition concurred that they would be opposed to any type of, construction in the front yard areas regardless of restrictions or submittal of site plans. 8 . In the future, it may be feasible to short plat this property and the adjacent property as indicated by Mr. Greene. However, this shall only be accomplished when there is concurrence by adjacent property owners to proceed with this subdivision as it will change the character of the area and infringe on certain property rights. RECOMMENDATION: For each of the above reasons, recommendation of the Hearing Examiner is to deny the submitted application. ORDERED THIS 21st day of March, 1977 . 244 649/1121-6C. mes L. Mtadt Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of March, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Gary A. Greene Bev G. Morrison William I. Mendenhall Charles Shane Karl Morrison TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of March, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071, Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before March 29 , 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the' Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. J PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 15 , 1977 APPLICANT: GARY A. GREENE FILE NO. : SHORT PLAT NO. 018-77 ; EXCEPTION NO. E-019-77 ; WAIVER NO . W-020-77 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a two-lot short plat, together with an exception from the Subdivision Ordinance to allow the short plat with a 20 foot private easement to the proposed interior lot. B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : GARY A. GREENE AND BEV G. MORRISON 2.. Applicant : Gary A. Greene 3 .- Location : Vicinity of 3011 Mountain View Ave . N . 4 . Legal : Lots 62 and 63, Blk "A, " Hillman ' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addi - tion to Seattle No . 1 , according to plat thereof. Detailed description available on file in the Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 21 ,000 sq . ft . land area and 15 ,000 sq . ft. water. 6 . Access : Mountain View Avenue N . 7 . Existing Zone : G-6000 8. Existing Zoning G-6000 in Area : 9 . Comprehensive Single Family Residential Land Use Plan: 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chron- icle and posted in three . places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The request for short plat , exception , and waiver is to permit the construction of a single family residence between the existing single family residence and the shoreline . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The area was platted many years ago into narrow lots extending from Mountain View Ave . N . to the Inner Harbor Line . The existing house was built on two such 30 foot wide lots . The house was constructed approximately 250 feet from the water ' s PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : GARY A. GREENE SHORT PLAT APPLICATION NO. 018-77 ; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO . E-019-77 ; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS APPLICATION NO. W-020-77 , edge. The adjacent house to the north was built in approxi - mately -the. same position , with a second house later construc- ted on the waterward portion of the lot subdivided from the front portion along Mountain View Ave . N . This area is called Coleman Point and is the only existing residential shoreline area in Renton that has such large lot depths to the water ' s edge . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site drops toward Lake Washington from Mountain View Ave . at a slope of approximately 6% , then levels off at approximately the center of the property . The overall elevation difference between the lower half and the upper half of the site is approximately 7- 10 feet . 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (Age ) - Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of erosion is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , row crops , and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : Primarily species induced onto the site by man , together with lawn area . 4 . Wildlife : Various waterfowl and small rodents . 5 . Water : The site is adjacent to Lake Washington . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing single family residence on the site with approximately 250 feet of open space between the structure and the water ' s edge . There are single family residences both north and south of the subject site. Mountain View Ave. N . abuts the property on the east. The Burlington Northern Railroad right-of- way exists to the east of Mountain View Ave. N . F. PNEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists of single family residences , most of which are located on waterfront lots . Except for the area imme- diately on Coleman Point, most of the homes have been con- structed on lots with a relatively small amount of develop- able area . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" sanitary sewer main and a 6" water main are available to the subject site . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department and subject to City of Renton requirements . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route No . 240 operates along Lake Washington Blvd . and Burnett Ave . N . 4. Schools : The site is within 3/4 mile of Kennydale Elemen- tary School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within 1/4 mile of Kennydale Beach Park and Lake Washington Beach Park. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : GARY A. GREENE SHORT PLAT APPLICATION NO . 018-77 ; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO . E-019-77 ; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS APPLICATION NO. W-020-77 H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-729 , "G" General Classification District 2 . 4-706 , R-1 Residence Single Family I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Subdivision Regulations : a . Section 9-1105 , Plat Requirements for Short Subdivisions b. Section 9-1108 , 23 . A(9 ) , Private Streets and Reserve Stripes c . Section 9-1108 , 23 . F d . Section 9-1109 , Exceptions J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : The subject proposal will remove a certain amount of soil and increase runoff through the addition of more impervious sur- faces to the site. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : The additional residence to the area will create new social interactions . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 as amended (RCW 43 . 21C) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the- subject proposal (see attached) . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A visinity map and site map are attached . N. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ; 1 . The proposed lot sizes are approximately 10 ,500 square feet each , exceeding the requirement of 6 ,000 square feet for the G-6000 zone. 2 . The applicant proposes to construct a low profile residence on the proposed lot. This combined with the elevation difference of adjacent properties , should not significantly impact the view waterward from adjacent properties . How- ever , height restrictions should be considered . 3 . The property immediately to the north of the subject. site has been subdivided in a similar arrangement and a house constructed on a pipestem-type lot . The applicant pro- poses to use this pipestem as an access easement to the • proposed interior lot. The proposed overall width of this easement is 20 feet , which complies with the 20 foot mini - mum pipestem width of the Sibdivision Ordinance . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE _ GARY A. GREENE SHORT PLAT APPLICATION NO. 018-77 ; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO. E-019-77 ; WAIVER_ OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS APPLICATION NO . W-020-77 4 . The applicant proposes to pave approximately 6 feet in addition to the existing 9 foo.t wide paved area to provide a total paved driveway width of approximately 15 feet . All city departments , including the Fire Department , have no objections to the short plat , exception , and waiver. 5 . It may also be possible for the property owner to the south to subdivide in . a similar manner . However , it does not appear to have sufficient width between structures on either side to facilitate a suitable driveway easement or pipestem. Therefore , the granting of the subject request may not set a precedent in the area . 6 . No curbs , gutters , or sidewalks exist along Mountain View Ave. N . The applicant has agreed to establish restrictive covenants requiring participation of the subject property in '-any LID for such improvements . 7 . Sewer and water are available to the site . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the short plat and exception to permit the private easement as proposed subject to : 1 . Final Planning Department approval of site plan design and elevation of any structure constructed on the site , with particular emphasis on height control to protect the views of adjacent properties . (Suggested maximum height of 15-18 feet. ) 2 . Access and utility easements shall be filed with the short plat. The access easement shall be a minimum 20 feet in width and be permanently surfaced to a width of 15 feet to allow proper fire , emergency , and vehicular access . Recommend denial of the subject waiver request as per Public Works Department comment and granting of an indefinite deferral subject to filing of restrictive covenants with the subject property to ensure its participation in a future LID for such off-site improvements . - _J I4\._. / N son 6T __ z l07 .ae f �� M__ , 1 io9 4 1 \ �, 67 J .OS ' YGgi 94 / / s '; oz Id `7 / ex 91 .._ .oo e.s-Z .1, cal A.i 80 r ( `r_' _ _ 079 / 78 .litytlylik[r- 9L .0 I . • fi 6 5 ,r / la1,i,1,[4,n, ;,..� ••I.1.r.N3>�l7<'.. , 69 uA zz L. I 1 ___ 70 I 1 Arial ii Multi _-- f rm� rrri I A x t Z6 b7 0 I •,/ / IF :i11111 . • IIf1111111;141 ► 1 66 /3 _ '' '.m ull' i : .. G G' Epp_ / . .17. ) r:. glIMMIN .! .. I 20. 29 3' • r.j 74'.. Aira, .. .gi I! Al il-111111Nlinin-Inimmuii: ill ' . ; ; 1 1 , 3 . IU11 11 ii I , a r i ' 1011111 11111 111' \ Z S, 1 .,, k` f � ,,�� r' lr�•� �1111111 Illliilii II AL . G .�.-: I \ V.' 111111111111411110' 0 *IC., i • l 1 `ik, 7[ L.�0_,IIIIII II 1 Ill III . 4. ir ;z:i ____v,E coA \�"a 11 r �11 1 11111/11 111! * 1 • l� s Sua7 ACT `` .l I 1. 1 II IG G,12 1 r / O�w�Fe..y • n . I / 50 5 • �-ii7 2;111/i �I i1TE1 111.1TED i la : _i -71 fa r\-\11---7.9 151' 1.1-1- i I ,� a. ZI„ 277 . - G 0 • \ 275 09 xc _ :raw,I:RY I I \ \ • x, ..i -- a._ o- I -Z 295 7e2 t 14 as ,<•.II.a 1 \ . 1 %\\ " 4^a e7.�.. I � 1 ]�x !!I ... 1 •550 \ 338 1 ..,329 ..r, ' . 1 ii„,. SHORT PLAT; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: GARY A. AND JOAN GREENE ; File Nos . 018-77 , E-019-77 , W-020-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mountain View Avenue North . . APPLICANT GARY A. & JOAN GREENE TOTAL AREA ± . 25 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Mountain View Avenue North EXISTING ZONING G-6000 , Single Family Residential EXISTING USE Single Family Residential , PROPOSED USE . Single Family Residential ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS . * �� // • •4' if // I, P //. • . I/ 40 ' IP' . mI ii 444 __::{1 t ••0 M. WRP 5T =..\ 4441 i ------n- i/4 __ �- , - __ 3_.._ I 2 N, 3 2 NP T / _._ ' / ______ Air ...., . dokiolkaiw I 0 i 7. 1 w P -N. • 315T _---i A --:=- 'IP- iaiii r ffillitrrar 1 . l 's Z 0/002 Ihi iffillah•./.o-7/4,4 . I- . -fifit fir CMa o d _s re 3 M. 3°TH . * \ .. —--- • No 01t • \ \, N 4S CA I-E r"=ZDO' ' .5uBIECT 5a mi • • AprIscant— 6AR,yA; 4 JoAN REErI>_ 5140Ki PLAT No. 018-77 WtIvER No . w- 02.0-77 f;_Xc.`{')4 1 dN - E - 0V% -77 PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/PLm-SIGNIFICANCE Short Plat No . 018-77 • Exception No . E-019-77 Waiver of Off-site Application No . Improvements File W-020-77 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . •ECF-216-77 ® FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Application for a two-lot short plat approval ; approval for exception from the Subdivision Ordinance for a 20 ' private easement to the proposed interior lot; and application for waiver of off-site improvements . • Proponent Gary A. Greene Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3011 Mountain View Avenue North Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ® have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is ® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : • • Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration 'of non-significance : • Responsible Official Gordon Y . Erick en Title Plan > 0 .. ec o y. . Date 3-3-77 /, -:a 1 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , Gary A. Greene , Joan Greene B.G. Morrison , Sylvia Z. Morrison are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as Exhibit ' A ' attached hereto . WHEREAS , the owner( s ) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owner( s ) hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs , and assigns as follows : INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner( s ) of the above described property , their suc- cessors , heirs and assigns , hereby agree and covenant to participate in , sign a petition in support of , and accept any future Local Improvement District ( LID) or city initia- ted proposal , and pay their fair share therefore , for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance . Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs , gutters , sidewalks , street paving , sanitary sewers , storm sewers , undergrounding of utilities , and street lighting . These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9- 1105 ( 6 ) of Title IX of Ordinance # 1628 of the City of Renton . l ' DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . Gary A. Greene Joan Greene B.G. Morrison Sylvia Z. Morrison STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this day of 7.?;4 zG, , 19)7 , before me personally appeared 44 / the person (s ) who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person ( s ) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . No ry Public in and for th tat of Washington , residing at m i ; , .. , - '4--- , '• . . \ CITY OF RENTONT PLAT APPLICATION _ of RFC �/o,-f / -/ jSHORT PLAT �'` n[ J. FILE NO 6/1- 77 CFI, b o •MAJOR PLAT Z. DATE REC 'D "�� -- '7 TENTATIVE FEB 1 1977 FEE $ /G�-fl `° �' a . 'V`5 PRELIMINARY r" ------ �.--- RECEIPT NO . //aS/1 FINAL 9 • 2�f �� , SM NO. N�+ DEPPR� PUD NO. . APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : • 1. Plat Name & Location 3011 V'/ mountain View Avenue North Legal Description Attached 2 . No. Lots 2 . Total Acreage11 .280 tge$oningG-6000 3. Owner Gary A. and Joan Greene .Phone AD 2 _9261 - Address 4648 89th Avenue Southeast, Mercer Island, Washington 98040 4. . Engineer Phone Address 5. Underground Utilities : . Yes No Not Installed. Telephone . P Electric Street Lights Natural Gas TV •Cable • ' 6. Sanitation & Water : g7 City Water / { Sanitary Sewers L.:7 Water District No. /-7 Dry Sewers • /-7 Septic Tanks 7. Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance ,i ,1 1 1 8 . DATE REFERRED TO : ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH 1 , TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING . ' BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER • 9. STAFF ACTION : • SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED i . i, - 10. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : u ' , . PRELIMINARY PLAT . APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION : PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PI,A'1' , APPEALED EXPIRED 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: • DATE DATE BOND NO . & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT o _ • Planning Dept . Rev. 12/71 . .• ';'•:', . '. r, •••;,-. ....-.-•-f.,; . „ ' . • — , • ',•,'.Z.;1' . ..,. •--- . ... .....,. • *.'::-. , • • ' ... . . •,-,,,,.:, , • . ... . . . ' .• '1',•,4:,• . ... •, ,•,'.., •, ,• . .. . • •.. ,:•;••,,..i",' . -,. 2. • - . ,. • ''-,•'‘‘.•T:1; .• ,.•• . . .. ., • •-„, •. .. . -.,:-. ','il: --- : • +;;,• - 2'1;";;': :' ''•'-',....,• • . • ' .,.5.24.• . ' • .s;..!,-,..., ':-..,••••.;,.,- . IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON , . ...-,•,..,,! ...,.., . c..,,,,,, , ' .. ;','„eyi'_;' • ..,:, , „..,.:. .. .,.,. • . • . . • , . , • ' Wft--1,____It--__ZERI,' lots sixty-two (62) and sixty-three , (61) , - , .,..,. block "A" , Hillman ' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden 1...1*, Addition to Seattle No. 1 , according to plat thereof:.: - recorded in Volume II of plats, page 63, records' of . • • • -:.•:4.-i' :: : • said county; . . ... TOGETHER with Second class shorelands adjoining, as , . , established by decree entered October 19,, 1923, in , .. . , King County Superior Court Cause No. 156371. : , • ,. • ' ... , . , , • , . , ,. . . - ''... .‘"ip,s4 • ,,,•,...•••• ..., • ••:.;,, • . . . . . • . . • . - • -• w-.4. -.,. ,...,-. ,,- . . . . , . , .r ., ..,.,,' %• ' '' ' • ;f1,e'''P. '... 1.,"'.r'. ''..1 '..'''f;:',‘ . 1 . . , .. 1 .' . .i0i!,t. ..,-.;;;;;:•4.. ;,',4-3,• ;,.?,;.c,L,;: . • . , . • , . '-',,... • ' .4"'-'4•;. . . . . , . .. . .;.•;''''. , ', , .",,o.t'A';,• . -"I';';:•.:-i-",,••4, i,--,;',',,,,,-,4/,, • , ' . . • ':;:''•'.'''' '.. . ,• . '''•`;;'- ' l!'';'-' •IP- . .' v•' '''-V.;'!;',,,,;•.;'A-.'!;,, . . . , , . , .. , .., • , . . -; , •:tk:3,',i . ,,...,,t,-4.,;.,.-tr. • ;'. .J. , . . . . , .,. . - ' . . . . 0,14 .• ' • .• '-' '• -•;40.-e.0';'.. , • ,. ; '.• .....::'t";•, -'''',-' ' t,,,,},",1•• - ' ;•••••;:'...4..";-', ;-•P;. .. „ • ",-,'-,,•;";4 : . . , • • • ' .'lq':r.,.-'. ' 1. , r'i. ' 'i'is`'i,,', .,, . 1,.;;;;I'i, i'V,,, • ..,'...-.,,. • • ,. it. • ett-,..;;' :1:`•:k,••.,„ • , . . .. , ' '';,?,,-;:-. A, -'". • ';•,', '' • -• '; - :7?''.4W. ''''S;1.:‘t'Of."' . . • . - . . , , • • ',-':', ' '-14',Ieic. -. .Y: -.A.:,-,..,:,;.. ii. . . . . , • •.:!'' ...,r.'• : '..:i.;&•.•••i,,: - . ,..,';1..-,ili.:..;;:•';`•,'",!--- , • . . . . , , • ti.'.,,". ' ; . •.;' 1,,f -:•••:.;;'...•-•,.•; - ..,f',-;:'•:: - • •. - .•;•• -.:'•, • , , : . .. . ,.. ,. • ''... ••..'i;' .., • , 4 ... :4(....,.. ,.'k•;",,• 4,,,:.,, r'..: '-','''.-:—,.:',:, ..,••• . -,,,s, • -•p..,.....A,''.. •,,''f . . • '..,....i.:.:F.',. .. .,:-'-;••••. ,-'•r,..:.-• . -',:..-.. . .,...(: . , ,;,. .L.... .;. ..,.....-.. . . ..,;) ... ,.., . ,.. 'iL,...'..i. ' :,:.;k•k;!;%, ,. .,,.... , . • „ ,.,0,val•. ','.1 ,.',,,,I,i,•..'(,:,',..I.:, '' ''....'''fi; —' , ; ,, • ..,, ... . .. N'i... ', 'J'I.'''''i" '... • .•...''' ',.V.'•4 '..'''...., ,,,, ,Y,..'.'4T4 . • :,•, ,,• .:q..-',X';•,'.', '.'. ',.,";1;-...:, -•..54',:.` •'.. •"• Y' . , . .. .,, " • .• , • ,,.'; ,'.',2146c''• .,.., '„'„,.,„;';, . "' ,4:404.4;, 4 .'• ....i7,;',,r..;. 'i'.'CIi. ..,,, . . . . . . ,' :t,•,,,;i.,1"; • '''''W'''.•!- .4.,•;;,,':"':•. , - ,-;:.;', ' P...1,-,IN, • . . , , ..1'.'.',;'''. . . '-,`!;,, . • . ;.''.1.11,!, -. .' , ..W.•i''.''i•?.'1:4-: .• '," . , . ' . : , • i i';';.''' ,..,,,,',...,",' • r r... ....... '','::.1 ' . . • ' . :•lig!' • ' • ' '..,;N.."'!:.4.T, :',•' - • ' 4..;"•';',,,"!--:(e.:',:.. '',,'',..„•• • ' :''„;,1/44\7, . f: '.,'„: ;;''''...,'..;,,,4 ;./,. • . . , , 1 . "rt0At,. , . ••.'i".ii.':, '';'...N .. .• „ -';',s,,,,q,. .,,,,. .. -- :,,,,f r"'-,,'.',"t,"' e Illi I • ''':,),,!.s-:',‘ '' mil , . . . ,,;,,,. . . :-.-eR,-.4.''.• ' . :':,..:,":,:.',. -:.'..„4,,,0 - • .. '.,.4.„A,.Q• . .. .,.-•:''cc:4'. ...,-•:.!it:'., ;:4-'' ; — "•-•• : •''):::: :t.' ',.. -, ' - - 11.4.1 , .',.,•',.- ':.1..it•ii4., •i 1--'';',''',...1',...`;'AA;, '';':',' ••. ,. .•-;, .4:;;;:- ,'J.t•h;,I.,;'‹; ---.,.,•,..-;,-- '• ;A`,.'i • „ . , ' ; • :•.•,;;•- `';• • . '• -,;;fd-').': .„.. , . . . .!, ,;• . .:11!;,,,- . . ; , •,-.,,,„ •,:or-A-tiz . ; '';',..'-‘• -• - ',' • 5'.-:-.r--,--',',..'..gf • . .-,..,.. . . . ;-•.•' •, ,, .);,;:•; ;' 'Wq,; , ' - ,.t.•'t!,ti.-; •,',:,- ,,,,,•-; . ..:,..K't;y:',‘„,-• • -• ,-;-.tte.-1,1..4.... -,',. ,.:,--,,p,,, • ,, . t A .,..,0 - . . . . , .•., . , •':.-- fl..r,'-1:' 1:,,U4.: -,I.IY. . ,.:4•4.kz- ',;41,,'"::, ''- '',.-AL' ''''';!".,:';'.' ''.•:;:; .-,:,"'-'•i"-. VA . . , -_,,, ,.. . .. ..,-;-. • ..). -" • ;'.-' ,..",,.'i ,-,'P'..M ,. ,, , . , - -.'-';,;,:, ,... •,,x11,1',1'.4 '..''t-;!:' ;•;•••• . • . ';:"A''';.";• . .... . . ::. :.;• ' '',1)7(t;j' • :. •' ''Af';';V,1,....-,-;.•;';',..?: ,..,. -.---t.c.4-'. ...--''-•;- ',1, '• . .. i--r.;:':,:.,.: t•„ . -,4('''-i,-' .. ,',:.s', , ,;.„'....§1:.',ii' • „fi, ,-:',.',',-?'fil.4'..,: .., . • , '' 4ii . . _ . 1:. . . •.. . . ' ..._. ' ' ' '"4-‘fi• . ', . ',,,i'j::,. '''.,-. . 4', '.;',.i..::' • '- '''. ' , ., ' ..ils':',/-:;;; ,'"'.;,i.W.:- ,' • 1 ,. .-. : . . . ...' ....1,:, • .' ?3",,.• - . , , ., . • .. , • ••. '• - " 4;' . ..•.:,'....,-.4";, • . , .„."••j •.. , . . . • ''' ' . . i t 4 Ifi 4, ' ''.4 •. . . . , . . . , . . I ' o , • , ' : 1'..• — • ;N.C.., • . ' '.•• if..%* . , .• ' . ' • ';;;1*•'.'•.. . , „ .. _ . • . : ';', ' ' ',i'•'!2.'.:?'.0 . - .,.. ,,. . , . W' • . 4 :..., . y:, :!.'..,,` . .:,,"...: . ,. „.. ..' . .,';''..s;-'-',•. .•. . , . . ., ',;.-•:• , r., ;',, •' •'...1.;','.:,'41; ' '' ;;:-:.1t••[;.-',,,..4;`,t,:. .., i. . , • , . `i • AFFIDAVIT i I, , being duly sworn, declare that I s am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the ;T foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true- and,,corr.ect to the best of my knowledge and belief. 4) t B.G. Morrison j �i. Subscribed and sworn before me - Sylvia Z. Morrison r: this / day o£ .��Gt=4y/ , 1977 ► '-�/, -, /.( •Z./i 53. 2/1/(S),1 ,1-1- - ci(-3 Notary Public in and for the State of J J - Greene ( )111 Washington, .residing at >Z. �7 1 j(7 • U Gary A. Greene ., (Si nat J- /". C ',46,___ ___ 2 .)1, ue of Owned a /f- ' (Names of Notary Public) g r5 ] &in' . el- 9 P..--e-iA-7 li-? _4648 89th S.E. (Address) (Address) • Mercer Island, Washington 98040 • (City) (State) AD2 - 9261 • (Telephone) • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) i CERTIFICATION 1 This is to certify e foregoing application has been inspected by me ; .,`,,=.c and has been fou ' 'qo R /p ough and complete in every particular and to conform to the 1 `� r ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the 'i C L�uc1 plication . ' C.) FEB 1 �911 f Date Received F I- , 19 By: 9N�'�G DEQ� Renton Planning DOP t- . gis i•/e ND . C -D/9'- 7'�y c9,/ 4 . r1,9.47 4648 89th Avenue Southeast Mercer Island, Washington 98040 February 10, 1977 Planning Department O City of Renton City Hall �\ RECFI\IED: 'o Renton, Washington 98055 V 2 FEB 16 1977 Attention: Hearing Examiner and City Council -o EXCEPTION TO SHORT PLAT OFF AN EASEMENT 1vG DEPP'� We are requesting an exception to the subdivision ordinance to allow a 2 lot short plat with access provided by private ease- ment to one of the lots. We feel this request is justified for the following reasons. The subject property was purchased by B.G. and Sylvia Morrison in 1947, and they have been sole owners since. Mr. and Mrs. Morrison have deeded the,west 188' together with second-class shoreline adjoining to Gary`and Joan Greene, for • the purpose of building a low-profile home thereon. The ad- joining property to the north is owned by Robert Burr, who has access by private road from Mountain View Avenue North. Mr. Robert Burr has agreed to grant an easement for access to the west 188' of subject property and B.G. Morrison is willing to grant a 3' easement paralleling said road in order to give said easement a 20' width, and paved road a 16' width. To date a recent survey of proposed easement has not been made by a qualified engineer. If this is necessary please inform } us. We know of two or three other,properties on Mountain View Avenue North where two houses have ,joint access',from Mountain View Avenue North far less desirable than this proposal submitted. With this proposal we are filing a covenant to agree to build a low-profile (one story) house, so that the view from adjoining properties will not be impaired. 111111/11 When Ted Jones owned the Burr property approximately fifteen years ago, he agreed to a joint easement with Mr. Morrison. However, it was not anticipated that zoning regulations would subsequently be made to prohibit this action without a request for variance. Mr. Burr is in the process of building an addition to his home and is in urgent need of new underground utility lines for his property. We propose to work together in this regard. We feel that the proposed subdivision of this property to build a low-profile house would not be contrary to the city's comprehensive plan, as the zoning is residential in this area. The lot is 188' x 60' and is larger than minimum size for a single dwelling. The access to the lot will certainly be large enough for vehicles, utilities, fire protection and water supply. The sewer line has ,. already been established on this lot. 407/10. uee,oeut Gary A. Greene, Applicant rT , I I I r 1 q I II i • /%- /c"'', 0 . - 6-?es "l7 e 46 . i/2 -;s 4648 89th Avenue Southeast Mercer Island, Washington 98040 February 10, 1977 Planning Department City of Renton City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Hearing Examiner and City Council REQUEST FOR WAIVER FOR OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS I refer to the attached letter to the Renton Planning Department regarding "An Exception to a Short Plat off an Easement," and property described therein. In connection with this short plat application we request a waiver of off-site improvements which we feel are unnecessary. There are no off-site improvements on Mountain View Avenue North at this time. If in the future they are required by the City - of Renton, we will be willing to participate. 41AY/41"<4124'.'4— Gary A. Greene, Applicant • (-0-F RECEIVED'' �o FEB 16 1977 NG DEP Psv6+ I � � ' � . ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . !4 Traffic Engineering Div . 411 Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) MI ke( C4440:1i c7/j-7 7 shiotreLAr SUBJECT : Review of ECF- � /6 - 77 ; Application No . : Action Name : M/ J 4 4 r Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : •%yR7"fc J/arc:• /% Comments : No S, 5 ;tie a..,, f _7 /7 J Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : / -�'-�y/ .rU L5fzf,,,-cf-er7<<7- . Comments : A -,• '` e-c,72- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6- 76 (OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CIT 'EPARTMENTS : Department : _ ____.___�_____-• Comments : - I / Signature of Dj,rector or Authori ze'd Representative Date • • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 7 //c-Z; • Comments : P/-G'`-7.I5.21S 5/)/r}GL- 0 c, V�/�7 `;� cy. Grl f��i Gli/i/'/ / /l/2�' �'il/'✓/ �1 C� �l� -/47c ' 7)-5 ,07 Cl1 Signature of irector or thorized Representative — Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : • • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : f ,.j i •( .,- • . , Comments : • ) - /; _._._`.i gnature of Direct-ffr. or Authorized Representative OF RENT • . • ..( • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON nic[1\IC O:. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM V FEB 16 1911 ='i FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ,,5/or/ /7 / G ,.da_ 7.7 NN/NG DEQ , Application No. -E 0/ f- 77 c G/- o�?0_ 77 ' • Environmental Checklist No. CL'/" — /'-77 PROPOSED, date: FINAL • , date: , .. ® Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance •`,;; ' ElDeclaration of Non-Significance O Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENT'S. :r,. ; • Introduction , The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C, RCW, ..requ'.i'res ' .. all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental val•ues• both for,',,their , ,:.' own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an- EI,S` :be prepared for all major actions .significantly affecting the quality of the environment.. The'.purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or3',not a proposal ,is such a major action,. .. Please answer the• following questions as '.completely"'as you can with the information ' presently available to you. '.:Where explanations of your answers,,;e,re required, or where• ; you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers . Include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if. necessary'. You should-,' • • include ',references to any reports or studies of whlch. you are aware and which are rele- vant to 08 answers you provide., Complete• answers to< these ques•,tions now will help ell . - agencies•,.involved with your,;proposal to undertake the required , nvironmental review,.kwith- • out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal ,' not just �t'o`; the license for' w,-t;ch • you are. currentl 1 in or: the ro osal_ for which-approval roval ,i.s:':.sou ht. - Your answers • � Y �aPP Y 9 P P DP 9 -'. should include the- impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though comple.tlon,may not occur unt,i,l ;sometime. :in the .f.ut,ure, This-will allowa;ll • of the' agencies which will ti:e: involved to`complete -th;eir environmental.-review now, .with- out duplicating paperwork in':.the future. :^x. �, ,y,, `r, NOTE : ' This is a standard form being used:'by all state and local','agencies in the Ste';te of Washington for various types of propoials . Many of the questions may not applyo your proposal . If.'-a question does not anpl;y,y j,ust answer it "no}'.'. and continue on. to;;,the„ next question. . , • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. FORM I . BACKGROUND . . 0. , 1`. Name of`" Proponent' 'Gary A. and Joan Greene 2': Address and phone number of Proponent: '' " 4648 89th S.E. ";:Mercer Island, Washington 98040'' ", Phone #Ap 2 - 9261 - • 3. : Date Checklist sub-mitted , '% ". 4. Agency :i ,,,, , ;u. requiring Checklji st •C�pcy'`',Of Rentona Planning peparttjepii 5. Name of proposal , ':i f applicable': '' 6. Nature and brief description ,o:f,;the proposal (includin'g but not limited 'too its size, general design elements;:r';and other,,fa,ctors that wil l give an accurate understanding of :its'. scope and>'.`nature) : , _ ; , , .. Subdivision of a lot allowin&a 2 lot short plat with access prgvid by a private 20' easement road-to one of the lots. Each lot will be 6p!�x • 188' with only one lot having.60' on• Lake Washington. (See attached map ' with legal description). The purpose is for bujlding a low profile .house • , on the water front lot, located approximately 50' 'from the lake front. J µ, ,:s • -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as, well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the env,iron- , mental setting of the proposal ) : A water front property loacted at 3011 Mountain View Avenue North, Renton, ' .-,,<;. Washington. 98055. The lot is planted with grass at this time andhas a - gentle slope to the water. ' 8. Estimated dale for completion of the proposal : Six_months after acceptence by Renton Planning D• epartment. ' 9. List of all permits , licenses 'or government approvals required for the :p;roposal -. (federal , state and local --including rezones) : ti,r. At this time we are applying for a subdivision of property. If approved ' we will be applying for building permits, etc. ,.' 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activ14 - related to or connected with this proposal? If yesxplain: H• -+: l e, 5'S • -• r r11, Do you know of any plans by others which ?mayxcffect the property cove,red';,by Q� your proposal ? If yes , explain: ,'a No 12, Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the 'pro- posal ;. if none has been completed, but is -expected -to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form:.,;., ':,: We are• in the process of filing a short plat application to the 'City' of Renton Planning Department. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS'' �I . �'il , , ; :;; , . (Explanations of all "yes" .ands,"maybe" answers are .re'quired) 'r , (1) Earth.: Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic `li } substructures? yyyy c :Tn.— MAYBE . NO' (b) Disruptions.;' displacements , compaction or over.;,.; , covering of :the soil? r ' XX i:. Y MA BEBE P 0 • , (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief ,- , • features? `Yt MAYBE'' NO . (d) The destruction, cover 1ng',.or modification of any: .. unique geologic or phyisical features? �•� XX . ) 6;. A +4'. • MAYBE 'AFT (e) Any increase in wind orwater erosion of soils '::; ' either on or off the site? 'IX Y1S M E ' FO • (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands;:. or changes in siltation, deposition or.erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or;the , bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? XX . , % .. YES- MAYBE.' NO • Explanation. (B) Driveway and house foundation only. • ' ` - -3- , • (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: ' (a) Air emissions ,or deterioration of ambient air quality? • YES MAYBE ,;^NO , (b) The creation of objectionable odors? t ' `"` , -> MAYBE ;tRT- (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperatyre, ,;;; or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? :,`'. `;=,, • . ,` ',' ,ES MAYBE NOS '`A:;:;',. Explanation, • i:• ' ,('3), Water. •Wi11 the 'Proposal result in. i', (a) Changes in currents , or the course of' `direct.ion,,,o.f water movements, .in either:"marine or fresh water,? ' • :: (b) Changes in a:bsor ,tion ":r te's', draina a o �s`' - ,,t . P rd, 9e° P tter.ns, ' T la= . ..' E,i the rate 'and:"amount of.'surface water, runoff?. . ,, : , :;itr, -' ``, •'` Y"EE• MAYBE . • ('c) Alterations -to the coarse."or' flow of .flood waters? ;')c'x ;�',. ;.,, , ' . FEY"- MAYBE i,iii — . - (d) Change in the;: amount of surface waten5'in any' Water body? %, k::X){ . ^', ,,. . ,.."',--,2:, YES MAYBE .:: , .' �'=1d O •; Discharge in.t- surface waters or in ' al r1 ti.Q' y de) q anyalteration • •.,;r '.' " surface water: quality,. including but 'not 1imited'`to '' 'f' . - - temperature, dissolved oxygen or turb_idity? ., • ', • ';fyk " ' Y S. MAYBE ::� ;x; ( ) Alteration oif,h.the direction', or rate of_flow Of .,§'"�-y +w ground w t ,s?;'^` ,: - '' XX. . •s .„ '' ": -•` :: • k..rt YES • MAYBE,:;;[1.1)': ' '• (g) Change in the'':quantity`••of 'ground waters , either `<',;u. - . through direct additions or withdrawals , or thr.o,Ugh '= X ,,.. 7" int-erception''of an aquifer :,by cuts or,.;excavations:? NO ''�E.S MAYBE , . r,,, (h) De.ter.iorationi„in ground water qua1'ity,', either `'tFi"riiugh' _ ;; direct injection , or thro'•,gh,. he seepage of 'leachate, `:, ;i phosphates , detergents , ;:�i ;,tkrboFne'v.ir.us or 'bac',teria , or other substances into the ground waters? ";f,;. ' X '' -.,' 1, : "_ ''(i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available r,. ';t' ' s2;i; ' '�: - for public water suppl iest" L. ' ,S' ', XX MAYBE $t10 ' i tJ :' .;' , \ � ' `Exp1anation:. (b) : d ';lt.:s:-.''''':'" . ,..; • 4 Flora. ''`Wi'll 'the F;' osal '''"`'`'(. '')': p;..o'p r e s u l'•t:i n. ji , (a) Change in the",.`diversity'• of'��species, or. numbers. of',`,any " species of fl'ora, (including'::,trees , shrubs, grass ,',crops microf1ora and: aquatit 'pl�a.,rltws)? ,;1;; �_ YES ;{; r ,;, , , . . �f , ' MAYBE (b) Reduction of;;.the numbers of, any unique, rare or + ,:,;- = • ' endangered species of 'flora? -`" 7 ':`XX • .,�.,, V'S MAYBE 0 r•,I ,. • 'fir> (c) Introduction Hof new species:`of flora into an area', or in' 'a 'barrier;:;to` the normal'"'replenish'ment of exiepng species? : t: `.,ti : Y-!-- MAYBE .ry, (d) Reduction in acres e f "g o any:;y,'egricu]tu'r31 crop?' ;` ,,X'X E— MAYBE :;ITCT.- Explanation: __ :.gr ss now, `aid this will be reduced by the'' size ' of the house, •' -q_ , (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in. ',: ' ';:°; •;(a) Changes in the, diversity of species,-or' numbers o'f:.,• • . '°�;,:`t '` ••"'"'' .any species of fauna (birds,: land animals including; ; ' ' reptiles, fishr•,and shellfish.' benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)?; ',',:�F`,: •. `"'"'MAYBE N$ ,,.. 'i c :f. (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or . ' -,, . endangered species of fauna? • XX:'" ' '' ' YES ' MAYBE N Q,': ':r. .. . . (c) • Introduction of new species of fauna into an area F:: - • ' or result in a barrier to the migration or movement " , of fauna.? `. Vtg7 MAYBE ,*.1`' :y '(d) Deterioration `to existing fish or wildlife habitat,?' `, Xk.;: .:Explanation.: . ., ., .. , , .. .,. ., �'1,. . ; ,, • .`t',.. ,, t i. .Jg (6)., .:Noise Will 'the proposal increase existing noise -leve.l;s:`? .P " yX}:', • .,'J{s' YE,S ` MAYBE NET ;. , ;t, :Ex lanat'i:on. ,,;4,• c, . ti�P>, r:.. • _t`. 4, • .jlip!iy.1 • • '1rT''' lro„ ry,,iF.. (' ')' Li ht and 'Glare. W,i�11 the propQsal produce _n,ew light s;�` i,.: ;' gl are? • ', ;: .' fir' ',.',:, MAYBE .: .�;; Yam`' �', ,: `.Exp1anatitlon e,. „ �,,5''. ,.„ . • .. e is,.4'. •d_i.• S?„ ,JPeYti J: ptJ,': - �1 ..-�....r.. .,r..._.. „, I,fir is`: "i:l to - l/' ,,.`` ,':..a ' (8); : Land Use Will the -,proposal resW.l't in the a!Iteratio.n:•'oi?:�the 'f.<4;' .1s;� present or planned,-land use of anf,!area? Js'.,, ;ti -'' XX ?r ;v,;- ;t:I ,,;',...= S— MAYBE • ` i'on:';; xpl anat r.: >y;,:,' .,P~':' .at j;`'F,' ..;,ts:f f. 'C:(',. „'4:14.y . 4C,;;j• , ',OS' raj,.'` .d r - Jk'q.,. 4}•i. fit'• %i,.','•, iir° '+':;:Tyy•'; J;fyi. ,. ?:•!! 'r,: ill the �ro' osa l res'ul,t...,i n . ?r,:,y_.a.. ; � (•9;) :Natural Resources W .p p•, r'i • ., : (=` ^fik, a) Increase. in t'i!e,,rate of us'e'1of any naty'ral .resourc+fs? ' ' •, X-X^`' rj' <,t, ,='.`' YES MAYBE . NQ, r :(b). Depletion of .anyy'noA nrenewable natural .re•source7;? r°t'.). < • r YES' 'MAYBE , i'!l. • .'a :f. I':f`;{, `%a'b: _I.i„?f •'`'t,5, .,Y.:t J, '0 ''%Explanation w;r c ;;.• ' ,. J. a P 4,4AJ;q.'. , -.t 5. 91r 10 Risk of Upset Doe p p , .•involve�'_'a"risk' of arit'•?,"' �( ').': ` e s..•-,.e r o o s'a l:: 1 a: '4 • ` i.explosio'n. o.r the release ofih i!ai;d,ous substances (inclding; • 'h;;;, - • , '- but not "'l;,imited to,•:,,oi'l-;)pes,tIc1`des•, ..chemical's or radi-ltion) Y, <_ '' • . ;i'n the event of an acci dent 'or cu'pset cond,i:tio'ns? ;,`4%, '` ,`,.; �" `" ,MAYBE.• N ' :a,;•: twtt '. +f',� ., ,:1f'',�. ''l.`/;,� ' i�'Y A,}'�.i Y' 11.�7;''•� )G '. Y .. Explanation a;1'; a'.;. ;> ,,' A �a:'4•'3I (11) ''Populatlo+n' Will the;`proposal liter the location, dis;tri `•' '''�'' bution 'densi `"' ..'-'_ 'density, or;1,g,rowth ra,te•;'Q,f, the humari,population�, ,<` ''of •an area? .. ,_ XX;: µ,,.,. {L YES- MAYBE ' Explanation. •; °,.' :' . 1 .. ; . j?i.tiJ, • (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, ,or create a demand for additional housing? :.XX , YES MAYBE Explanation: _ r;, (13) Transportation•LCirculation Wi1,1 the proposal result;in. ' , '.'" • (a) Generation of additional. vehicular movement? ;< :•.',`• `'.. `'j10 (b) Effects on existingarking• facili P ties, or demand , for new parking? -j(X • P'ES MAYBE Impact upon '`ArJ (c) existing transportation systems? '•,r;": -,'•' j,_;Xx (d) • Alterationspresent to patterns of circulation orf ,•.:; •;;. movement of people and/or goods? :IX ' 1TE`S Af AYBE S` ;'t (e) , Alterations to waterborne, rail or air, ,traffic? XX S- : = V MAYBE. $0:. . • ';; • (f) Increase in traffic ha ar ,ti'' `¢z ds to motor vehicles F' " • 't' • • c cl i sts or `±XX .:i y pedestrians?, • 'lilt MAYBE, 7 ;Explanation. COL) , "" C.'�-Q b� 1 J .,d ��t , s str' .;ti '' =•r'•• -• '''•• (14) '''. Public Services. Will the proposal have an+ effect upon, or "? ', "'`'``' •', result in a need for new or, altered governmental services V''", in any of the following areas '" • ya) Fire pr to .` • • ; ,, •'•, " YES' MAYBE'.. ,• '' i• ' _ (b) Police protection? r• { :; ;:',' YESMAYBE N . ;, P ,(c) ' Schools? ;;,,,: X {,: • '':?y7t:• YES ' MAYBE'' , S'! d Parksits:' , ,( ) or other recreational' facilities?' ,,, } *,•1,< •,:• a i'11 I , ;,- •., :.fist': ' ',' ,,, , ="`: • z"> '' YES M Y B E Mbz,. X.': _ ','<';tt(e') Maintenance of,•:public facilities , inc,luding roads' A, ''' XX': 1, : S M YBE 'f(f) Other governmental services? ' ;eu 2?, YES MAYBE . • „.. ,,. c _ ,,. E x l a n a =i;.,.' ',. ,..Y ;'I ,ic. s,: ., , ,n1T:1 ,0, . .,.� ,:a^,t , ;`y., . 15 x'S , j, ''i :( ): :Energy :W111' the proposal resul;t•'in• ?-,t- t� •(,a) Use''of`substan ial am un • . r°s�` • '} ' . o tS '`pf fuel or 'energy? „ Xi r:, •; YEt- MAYBE NO (b) Demand •upon ez`it n sou e'�`�"of energy 'or require:>~' ` !. +'~' P p ,• 9 Qr.S; the; develo ment:..o ew s.0 t, s' of energy? ,a; ;.' XX. :`.:" Y '" MAYBE . ; Explanation • , ;t.; • ;; r,,. =iY;N (16) ,, Utilities,> Will the;;proposal result in a'need for new.. ' ,:r systems, 'or alterat.l;ons to the •'fo'llowing ,'util.ities s" '•;',. ' (a) Power or natural gas? ''i;,. XX;:: YES MA B Nry(� ' (b) Communications,:,systems? XX.r' , . , ' YES- MAYBE NNO; ,'+ . (c) Water XX ' YESMAYBE Na'-':',- -.�`• 4 .. - • -6- , (d) Sewer or septic tanks? XX YES M�6E,:,,,130- . • (e) Storm water drainage? X ,EYES MAYBE,,';VO ' (f) Solid waste and disposal? • YES MAYBE NU Explanation: . Y,' (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of ' . • . . any health hazard or potential health hazard (exclud'i'ng , ' mental health)? ::XX 1 E — MAYBE' ''NO Explanation. •___ _—_ __� , (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal' result in the obstruction of ', r any scenic vista ,or view open to the public, or will' "the '` 'proposal result in the creation. of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? AY\-' ,','. : YES MAYBE :" 0 ' ' , Explanation: j- nn��'' p� LO ,• .:" . f. •. , AAflSx �u�L _ --i SJtINL .. -�.. • ( 19) Recreation. Will ,the proposal,:,result in,$n impact"'up;on the % i:. quality'or quantity of existi'ng`:recreational opportun;i'ties? :X7{ . . . ', YES MA BE :'Y�`NO ' q's (20)'` Archeological/Historical . Will' .the proposal result in`• an ` ••alterat:i;on of a significant archeological or historical ` � site, structure, object or bu4lld!iig?' ' •;:>,: :' , XX i iqi,^), Yr5- MAYBE "°,(gyp • . Explanation iIiI_I .. ._.._.__ • _ ;;:.. :; III . SIGNATURE 4`� I , the .undersigned;, ,-.state that :to the best;of my knowledge the above information is true and ;`complete. .;It is understood that .the lead agen. maywithdraw any"d,ecla- '`' ' ration of non-significance that it might issue: in reliance upon this checklist;should tre be any°;w.h_ewillful misrepresentation, or willful lack of ;,ful1 disclosure on m4 part. •.,l:RrpOonent . . , ) Q : •r.I . ,(signed ,i•,• :, a .-i ;`. •(name pr ntd _ ---_ , y, y' City of Renton Planning Department ., 5-76 - . . . . . . , LOT : . ----•-••••---. • ...-- 59--- . .....---- • . --- -- ..----- ----- . ------ • .----- . . . ....-- 60 --- . - .-- . . J-- • 5, VO'Y --- . ---- TT.... -- ResViDea.K.E_ • . I , .-- ...- - . ...-- ......_. _ - 1-- ---- ...-- --- ---- - --- ..--- ---- . -- .....-""'" ,--"-••• ITPRoPose_D FrivEmeta-r ..--- —I I --PROPF_2TY -- , BURR. Fi UNE_ 61 Rr...sioemcE__ -1 * PAVED NT--- gEsEt,fr 17' PRESENT zd OVERALL EASEMENT FOST .., ... i ..--- ---- .• • ....PRESENT_ ..-. ..---• Z.., ••• ' \UNE_ k'••.- - ,- ---•• '''. --- - - , 3'EAsemENT 62. 6 .. ......._ tr CP,RPRT , , ....- . • ..-- . ....--""•••• . 2.. •, . (7-) . • • ....- , ....------.4 MORRISON. ..„-- 3 - --.....- _ ; --- RE.SLDENICE_ 65 _ ... ...- . 0 _.--- .---• ---- ./ ---- ...-:------. 0 F.--oRtaRaS1W — . _ 0 . 1- 64 5 . - ---- GREENE. - u--'RE5iDNCE. — ' --- ..-- ..---"* ...--- . _ _....-- . me_racemi464.1... 1 --- _ • vrig - . .------- - ,• • .....- .. --- 1 _ ...-- - ..--- • ---- BC-ALE_-r ...4.01 • . . . : -, . i ) --- . ---- . . ....-- • ---- SPORT FIAT • ' WFST- 4538' Lai 51)QTY TWO(62)4 SIXTY 71-1Fe (63), . . . . Bi-OcK. 'A, fit L_Lf\AANI'S LAKE_ WASEAINIGTOt.1 GARDE1Q . . . . . . - . OF EiDq.4 psEADTT-10 .1 TO SEATTLE_ 1\10- . . I P.MORDIK.IG •. 10 pu\-1-- THER.F2F- -RECORDED IN1 voLunna 1 , . . V . OF Pi_km,PPG _G-6, REcccaps oF 6,b..0 couNny _ . . , . ..,, .:_..., .,_ .. .. ... : ..„ . _ . . .• . _ .._ . - . , . ...- :-„, ':-.. : -, ---. • :-•2-- -- .:,..:, :.. - -. '• :: :_:-. . _ ,:- ,-. -•-...„ -...f.,-;•t•,-„_-•:3,......,.... - ..--.-. - , •__ ,. . . :, . .1CCIETHER_ WiTH SECCIND CLASS ,51-1cRELANID5 . . . • ••--'• - - - ' • ----- "-:- - -. - ' . ' ''. ' . ' "FICJOINI LNG,A5 E.517\13L15-1ED BY DECREE_ „ ._ _ , . . ENITF_RED OCICE5F..R.k9,1923 11•1 ICIKIG crxj,Nry _ V. PEZC 0 ia CiaiRT 4-13E_ 10. r7 1 N- 15G5 u- . - . . ..,.:... .. . . _ . • Wm-1 F_p,sEDAENisr\11§04.1)Fiafrit:k LOT '51XTY ONE.CG1) ab SurrY IWO ez2) • . , . . . . , . ,„..1, . . . - - . • . • .,. .. . . . . . . , . . - . 4- (-',I; " • . . . . . . - -- - • - -....:,. . . - . . . . . . DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS . WHEREAS , Gary A. Greene , Joan Greene , : B.G. Morrison , Sylvia Z. Morrison iz are the owners of the following real property in the City, of Renton,, :-. .';~;„;.; County of King , State of Washington , described as Exhibit ',A' attached hereto' WHEREAS , the owner( s ) of said described property 'desire to .i:` `-. impose the foTlowing restrictive covenants running with the ' land .•,as' - ,;•1 to use , .present and future , of the above described real property . ,0 NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owner( s ) hereby establish , ',. , ` q. grant and impose , restrictions and covenants running with „the land . ' rp h�e�rei nabove.-':described :with respect to the use by .the undersigned , - :q their successors , heirs , and assigns as follows : , � ' INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS � . :The owners ) of the above described property , their` s'uc- : cessor,s , ` heir.s and assigns , hereby agree and coven.ant°' :to _ -_ petition i n support ort of and ,:a,ccep.t' - ;; `_ :.,; par.ticipate . i:n , sign a pp any , future Local Improvement District • ( LID) or city i.nitia-, ted proposal , and pay their fair share therefore , for the . r;:r,, purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements ' ..', ' `` required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance . Said ;improve,-. :.;:.m ments 'shall include but may not be limited to the . i nstal l a- J: ti,on of curbs gutters , sidewalks , street paving , sanitary ' -4 _ sewers', storm sewers , undergrounding of utilities:, street lighting _ ' . - `'` These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9-'1:105(6 )` _ ''`' Y``r'°``:_ f Ti:,tle IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton - t, 2:1,1 '1 , r-lrlirli::1:.- !!,!):P:- -o :zs: ' - -- _..�-„ ---- DEPP -/- DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . , Gary A. Greene , Joan Greene B.G. Morrison , Sylvia Z. Morrison STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this. /: -- day of 1 tsf , 19;7 , before me personally. appeared b402 , /i/ .+,..,-.„._. ,,,..--N ?„.........17:1'\._-17-,11/t 7 e? ) . / //'/6.'-'1./V-(1 (-`,...--ti , ,Li _ 't.i, /,, , , <:-.7) \---/-7,,/,1,„ , , ,,, ,,,,, . the person (s ) who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and. ..; . acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and ' deed of said person ( s ) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my - official seal the day and year first above written . J Notiry Public in and for th tat. of Washington , residing_: t`' /„- -� -_. • �m Z THE CITY OF R1 NTO z — MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o ® - •cci rn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ) MAYOR . 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0�� 235-2550 February 25 , 1977 Gary A. Greene 4648 - 89th Ave . S . E . • Mercer Island , WA 98040 • NOTICE OF .APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE • AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL, FILE NO. 018-77; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, FILE NO. E-019077;_ WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, FILE NO. W-020-77 ---- Gentlemen : —he Renton Planning Department formally accepted the a::ve mentioned application on February 16 , 1977__ A p_�lic hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner h=s been set for March 15 , 1977 =representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre- se- t . All interested persons are invited to attend the he= ri - : . If you have any further questions , please call t-e Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . • • Very truly yours , • Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director B y . 2/' Milthael L . Smith Associate Planner wr J +J NOTICE OF PUBLIC fIEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER " RENTON) WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 15 , 19 77 _, AT 9 : 00 A . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : * 1 . APPLICATION FOR TWO LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL ; file No . 018-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 2 . APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE ; file No . E-019-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 3 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No . W-020-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 4 . REZONE FROM G-6000 TO R-3 ; file No . R-022-77 ; property located between Lake Washington and Ripley Lane North adjacent to and north of Misty Cove Apartments . 5. SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ; file No . SA-021-77 ; property located on north side of S . W . 7th St . west of Hormel Co . facility and east of the Earlington Golf Course and railroad spur track . Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 15 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A .M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR PUBLISHED March 4 , 1977 CERTIFICATION Michael L . Smith , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn �..� . ) to before me , a Notary Public , ,� ! / /' on the 1st day of March , 1977 . SIGNED %' \!i.1\ ,j ', .1\ . '..` 1..( ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED 21,1117 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE / MAJO PLAT , SITE APPROVAL Getticy 6, 21ekle (-1-F2,11- PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE117 SIGNATURE OR INITAL, , DEPARTMENT APPROVAL/ DENIAL DATE BUILIN 7 TRAFFIC ENG . ( ...),/7 _ _ 6. ENGINEERING 2/2 7 • C7F117) /-94d7-2 HEALTH etS REVIEWER ' S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : ), -, • kles_., L b (.(1 c., ,i)/ • C. .3k ,././(( ,. 't I . PLEASE SIGN THE E . I . W . : • - _ - ,'' • 4 . -•;F.'‘r•v ♦ +Y.K��r` {j'tryy.e� k V} ..'l 1 •3 y :: Y V.r "SM� .>.. _ _ - t .�_ • �:• ` \ , ,ry le. O R�- `k - N !O .. , - - 1 \\ "-- , \ ..1 i °4'.c.\-2, . ' \\ '•,i`\,,, ��!. _ R lb 2= , \ "\�%:. \ S 1--; ,/ , \ \\ 0 \ , ,/"." r. .12 . \ / . \ \�!G DES . ,,,,, c \ \:7) , \• ,� �+: e-_;„:„..:,;„:„_ - • , \ \ •;e- - . '..' - \ \ - ' i - "... : 0-, \ •, �1' ,,' t X. :\ . i 3/ ,1' '( ` " " I, .1 i • • 1'• \ .....\- - . , \ \ 1�>4,7;1- • ' •/et(" • • - - {� \ \ !nWI \ �• M qd.>.o\ja`cero • 25 , r \ \ \\ . • ‘jc. Tr:14, --• 'i , ' • .... % \ • 4%. .,)Y ,J • \ • -r. -: . ° If - -s.' :. t.. -" I '' ^ .i";"' i e. ?' " • 17 i"-- ' 4\1 7.„..' \ " 2 10:17"\,.. . if i.41 :--4--00 -..-,1_-11 ._...t_er.,,,,J. vl 1%.1 •.T! 1 „: I; f 1 �J►�•�;s `�• t„ , n •i TARN ;,/; + ,V \ ' 'it .I - XI' / I ',,.e-i--- — . f....0' . V • "f‘ Ij. I. ... #°I. I \ t; 1... .."'\ I \ \ ,,�\ '.� + .1 '1 wry- .,1. �`J �i , , r� f \ ; \. '< ;. a m ; �. ,� T, ,EfR t ' '' o t r `Se• f4 A \ , 1. c ' iw • r .f_tf �� {t----' l' -NI\ ‘..• J.. : 'A it ..mil t\! �' . �', r•f I .�.. ,• J ' _c V ; YT ` ma's `'"� _ I '/ ./ ! / 410, +'/- OF ��`v'N- • NOTICE RI � � PUBLIC HEARING (�[1\ 4 / RENTON LAND USE /� � ` ""il'LD �; HEARING EXAMINER Affidavit of Publicaf &n RENTO BLICSHEARIN �-`:i A PUBLIC HEARING - i MAR 16 v: WILL BE HELD BY THE � i RENTON LAND USE STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 .Q /� HEARING EXAMINER AT COUNTY OF KING ss. ` /� •HIS REGULAR MEETING �1 IN THE COUNCIL CHAM- 9ijiki • ,C'•��i' BERS, CITY HALL, RE- V NTON,WASHINGTON,ON G D E V�'�! • MARCH 15, 1977, AT 9:00 --'®---_`- A.M. TO CONSIDER THE Barb•ara•••Campa•g•na being first duly sworn on FOLLOWING PETITIONS: . . 1. APPLICATION FOR oath,deposes and says that�33.e..is the C h i e F Ci a rat of • TWO LOT SHORT THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) PLAT APPROVAL; times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and fide_erty located i ; has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred property t. to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- View Ave.of3011 Mt. paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, View e. No. and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained 2. APPLICATION FOR at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton EXCEPTION' TO t Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the • SUBDIVISION OR 1 Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, DINANCE; 'file No/ .' E-019-77;;•property • located in vicinity of Washington.That the annexed is a LZo.t.].C.e....0.f...P.u.blic 3011 Mt.View Ave. • No.- . . ..Beaxiag 3. WAIVER OF OFF . SITE IMPROVE- • MENTS FOR TWO as it was published in regular issues(and LOT SHO' T; not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period file 020 . property •-: N in vicinity of 3011 Mt. View Ave. No. of one consecutive issues,commencing on the 4. REZOM G- 6000ONE TO R-3;FR file No. R- ropert 4.t h day of March ,19 77 ,and ending the located d 22-77;between Lake Washington and Ripley Lane • day of , North adjacent to 19 both dates •and north of Misty inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- Cove Apartments. scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 5. SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE; file No. charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..-3•Z...9hvhich SA-021-77;property has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the located on north side • first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent of S.W.7th.St.west• insertion. of Hormel Co.facility and east of the Ear-. • Iington Golf Course ; , G r [r., (/j4--1,11.4 aci� ct/ and railroad spur f J l� track. Legal descriptions of ap- plications noted above on file in Renton Planning De- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4th day of partment. • • ALL INTERESTED PER- . SONS TO SAID PETITIONS C•Zl 19....7.E ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- :la j ` $ENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 15, �( '�/ 1977 AT 9:00 A.M.TO EX-' Notary Public • and for the State of W ngton, PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. residing at Kent, g County. GORDON Y. ERICKSNE" RENTON PLANNING -- DIRECTOR Published in The Renton , —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June Record-Chronicle March 4, 9th, 1955. 1977. R4224. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. March 21 , 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. • APPLICANT: Gary A. Greene FILE NO. Short Plat #018-77 Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 LOCATION: Vicinity of 3011 Mountain View Avenue North. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a two-lot short plat, together with an exception from the Subdivision Ordinance to allow the short plat with a 20 foot private easement to the proposed interior lot, and a waiver from the off-site improvement ordinance. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval of short plat and RECOMMENDATION: exception with conditions; denial of waiver request & granting an indefinite deferral. Hearing Examiner: Denial. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 8 , 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on March 15, 1977 , at 9 :00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Assessor' s Map. Exhibit #3: Detailed Site Plan, Proposal of Lot Separation. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith when the short plat request was submitted. Mr. Smith indicated he did not have the exact date, but the applicant would supply this information during his testimony. The Examiner inquired about the width of the proposed easement, and Mr. Smith responded that the easement would be 17 feet in width with a proposal to extend the area to 20 feet by utilizing 3 feet of the subject site and expand the paving to 15-16 feet. He reported that the present paved portion is 9 feet in width. Short Plat #018-77 Page Two Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 The Examiner noted that the applicant had submitted three applications and requested Mr. Smith to summarize them together, but that they would be reviewed separately by the Examiner. Mr. Smith read a letter which had been submitted to the Planning Department by the applicant on February 10 , 1977 , regarding. exception to short plat off an easement. The Examiner requested clarification on the map regarding a turnaround provision from the requested easement, which Mr. Smith subsequently described. The Examiner asked if Mr. Smith had additional exhibits or information to present. Mr. Smith indicated that he had no further comments at that time. The Examiner asked Mr. Greene, the applicant, if he concurred in the Planning Department report. Mr. Greene indicated concurrence but asked to comment on the report. Speaking was : Gary A. Greene 4648 89th Avenue S.E. Mercer Island, WA 98040 Mr. Greene reported that in response to the Examiner' s inquiry, the property to the north was short platted ten to fifteen years ago. In regard to the turnaround, Mr. Greene indicated that a turnaround was possible and would be incorporated into the final design plan. The applicant stated that he would be willing to answer any further questions. The Examiner asked for additional testimony in favor of the application. Responding was : Bev G. Morrison 3011 Mountain View Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Morrison briefly summarized the history of acquisition of the property and indicated that Lot B, which contains 10, 500 square feet, had been deeded to his son-in-law, Mr. Greene. He stated that the proposed structure would not interfere with the value of neighboring property and was hopeful that the request would not cause dissension in the neighborhood. The Examiner asked for testimony in opposition to the application. Responding was: William I . Mendenhall 3007 Mountain View Avenue N. P.O. Box 357 Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Mendenhall reported that he resides to the south of Mr. Morrison and had spoken with Mr. Greene on March 14 regarding the proposed construction. He indicated he was opposed to the request for the following reasons : 1) A verbal agreement was made by neighbors at the time of original purchase and construction of homes to place structures in a line to prevent the obstruction of views. However, some owners had broken the agreement during sale of homes;, 2) Building a residence in front of his home would not increase the vlue of the property, and he objected to problems of drainage and obstruction of lake view; 3) Mr. Mendenhall ' s residence would face directly towards the proposed residence because of the existing dogleg in the land; and 4) He did not wish to develop his property, and the development would entail negotiating with the abutting neighbor, Mr. Shane, for an easement access. Mr. Mendenhall briefly reviewed the history of acquisition of the property and expressed the desire to maintain a good relationship with his neighbors , but felt the need to conform to the original verbal agreement. • Short Plat #018-77 Page Three Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 The Examiner inquired about the agreement. Mr. Mendenhall indicated that it was verbal, not written, but felt it was a moral, binding agreement. The Examiner reported that the Planning Department had indicated a concern regarding obstruction of views, and asked Mr. Mendenhall if the proposed low profile structure was limited to a maximum height of 15-18 feet, would it obstruct his view of the lake. Mr. Mendenhall responded that a new home would obstruct his view and expressed the concern that a precedent would be set which would increase the density of the area and obstruct views from existing residences. The Examiner asked Mr. Mendenhall if the structure could be placed on any area of the lot which would not impair the view. Mr. Mendenhall reported that the property is level from front to back and because of the dogleg, construction of a home on any area of the property would impair the view. The Examiner indicated that stipulations of the request would include submitting a site plan and elevation plan of the proposed building which would require approval by the Planning Department and the adjacent property owners. Mr. Mendenhall stated that he would contact an attorney regarding his legal rights in the matter, and indicated he would require more time to investigate all aspects of the proposal. The Examiner stated that he would desire to leave all options open in the matter and asked if Mr. Mendenhall would consider any extenuating circumstances. Mr. Mendenhall indicated his opposition and requested reservations for future action. The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition to the request. Responding was : Charles Shane 3003 Mountain View Avenue N. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Shane stated that should Mr. Mendenhall develop his property in the same way as the applicant's proposal , it would create a similar view-obstructing situation from his residence . He reported that purchase of his home had been made because of the desirability of owning lake front property, and felt that construction of homes on the lake front portion of the lot changed this aspect. He spoke regarding the height of the road which is approximately 16 feet above the water level and the proposed structure which would be limited to 15-18 feet, and reported that homeowners in the area had broken the verbal agreement to a certain extent with construction of boathouses and second story additions, and expressed the apprehension that the verbal agreement would be further broken if homes were sold to new owners. The Examiner asked Mr. Shane if he had considered dividing his property and Mr. Shane indicated that he had not. The Examiner asked Mr. Shane if restricting the height of the building to 18 feet would obstruct the view. Mr. Shane indicated that it would be obstructive because of the view of the roof. The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition. There was none. The Examiner asked Mr. Greene if he had further comments in rebuttal. Mr. Greene submitted two additional exhibits: Exhibit #4 : Elevation Map of Property. Exhibit #5 : Site Plan with Trees Designated. He explained that the elevation map illustrated the grade from a north/south point of view and shows no difference between the grade of the Mendenhall property and the subject property, but if one stands on the property, the Mendenhall property has a slightly higher elevation than is shown on the map. He indicated that the verbal agreement had been broken by the construction of a structure on the Burr property which has been subdivided. He reported that drainage Short Pl.,.- #018-77 Page Four Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 tiles would be installed on the subject property and felt that the size of the lot of 10 ,500 square feet prevented a crowded appearance. He stated that he had agreed to restrictive covenants limiting the height of the structure to 15-18 feet. The applicant explained Exhibit #5 , which illustrates a number of large trees including three large willow trees on the Mendenhall property, one in excess of 75 feet, which he felt were an obstruction of the view. He indicated that the Burr residence was 20 feet in height, but did not obstruct the view from the Morrison residence. With respect to the elevation, he stated the property is flat, but increases in height on a crest where existing two-story residences have been placed. The Examiner asked the applicant about the contemplated design of the structure. Mr. Greene responded that he did not plan a flat level house, but would construct a one-story home with a moderate pitched roof within the height limitation including the chimney. He indicated there would be no second addition. The Examiner suggested continuing the hearing in order to allow the applicant time to contact an architect or have a detailed elevation plan prepared. Mr. Greene indicated his concurrence and stated that he had agreed to everything the Planning. Department imposed in every respect. He reported that he had contacted the King County Assessor' s office to investigate property values from a tax point of view and that the new structure would not increase or decrease property values in any way. The Examiner asked if the applicant would be willing to have an architectural site plan and elevation plan prepared even if the request may be eventually denied or approved. Mr. Greene indicated his willingness to prepare the necessary plans. Mr. Morrison stated that the greatest problem with existing lake views is the presence of large trees on the Mendenhall property, and felt that the trees could be cut if the issue were the maintenance of the view. The Examiner asked Mr. Morrison if he had trees on his property and Mr. Morrison responded that one large tree exists on Lot B, and it is the intent of the applicant to top the tree. Mr. Morrison reported that a certain amount of construction had been accomplished for houses , additions, boat and bath houses , and felt that the original verbal agreement had been broken between the four homeowners in the area and was no longer valid. Mr. Smith commented that the Planning Department staff reports are prepared without contact with abutting neighbors , and felt that to be fair to all residents , site and elevation plans should be prepared to increase awareness of significant impact on existing views , and that the Planning Department would recommend that this be accomplished. He indicated that restrictions on the property would be in the form of covenants with the land, site storm water retention facilities , and that the Planning Department would not recommend approval of a condition that will detract from the view. The Examiner asked Mr. Mendenhall if these suggestions were agreeable to him. Mr. Mendenhall stated that regarding the previous discussion about view-obstructing trees , that trees are natural objects and can be removed, but houses are permanent structures and cannot be removed. The Examiner directed the comment to Mr. Mendenhall that if he were opposed to any type of construction, the Examiner would be causing needless delay to continue the hearing in order to allow preparation of the pertinent maps and plans and asked Mr. Mendenhall if he would want to hold his final decision until review of such plans. Mr. Mendenhall restated that he was opposed to construction, that he may consider development of the property at some future time, but not at the present time. The Examiner summarized the application and noted that his job is not always an easy one, and he makes every attempt when possible to arbitrate between supporting and opposing parties. He stated that both property owners have certain rights , that he would review all comments and arguments for and against the application, consider the rights of both parties and reach his conclusion. The hearing on Item #018-77 , #019-77 , and #020-77 was closed by the Examiner at 10 : 20 a.m. 11, Short Plat #018-77 Page Five Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1. Mr. Greene, the applicant, requests approval of a two lot short plat together with an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow the short plat with a 20 foot easement to the proposed interior lot. A waiver of off-site improvements is also being requested. 2. It is the proposal of Mr. Greene to construct a single family residence on the west one-half of the Morrison property. This has been designated as Lot B on Exhibit #3 . Lot B is approximately 10,500 square feet in area and will access to Mountain View Ave. N. via a 20 foot easement located on the north portion of the property and shared by the Burr residence. 3. The existing zoning in this area is G-6000, minimum lot size 6 ,000 square feet. The proposed short plat would be in excess of the minimum requirement for square footage. This area is known as Coleman Point and consists of approximately four homes with lots in excess of 300 feet in depth. The Morrison home is in line with the Savoy residence built to the north, the Mendenhall residence built to the south, and the Shane residence also located to the south. These homes are all located approximately 20 to 35 feet from Mountain View Avenue N. and have front yards in excess of 200 feet. 4. The Savoy property to the north has a residence constructed on the west one-half, now known as the Burr residence. This residence was formerly a boat house that was remodeled into a cottage and then converted to a residence approximately 10 to 15 years ago. This residence was constructed prior to adoption of a short plat ordinance. 5. Mr. Greene indicated that he proposes to build a single family residence that would not exceed a height of 15-18 feet and would be willing to submit plans and profiles illustrating his proposed residence. 6. The four homes in this area were apparently built with similar setbacks to maintain an unobstructed view of the lake. Construction of these homes was followed by a verbal agreement made by the neighbors to prevent the obstruction of adjacent views. The Savoy residence to the north was sold and a subsequent building was constructed on the west one-half which violated the intent of the verbal agreement. Adjacent property owners are concerned about the effect the proposed structure will have on their lake views. It was noted that there are several large willow trees located on the western edge of the property which create an obstruction to the view. CONCLUSIONS: 1. These homes in the Coleman Point area have all been built on lake front property with considerable depth that has a virtually unobstructed view of Lake Washington and Mercer Island. The • homes are similar in character and architecture and maintain similar open space areas., 2. This open space has been violated by the construction of the Burr residence located to the north. There was apparent opposition to the construction of this building since it violated a verbal agreement by the four adjacent property owners. 3 . Construction of additional residences in the front yard areas would change the character of this residential area and would in effect double the density. Short Plat #018-77 Page Six Exception #019-77 Waiver #020-77 4 . Several property owners to the north of the applicant' s property oppose the construction of a single family residence on the Morrison property. 5. These property owners with the exception of the Savoy residence have resided in this area for a considerable amount of time and have certain property rights inherent in the purchase of their residence. 6. Changing the character of this area by short platting should not be allowed if there is opposition from adjacent property owners . 7 . Efforts to reach a compromise in the hearing process between supporting and opposing parties were not successful in that the opposition concurred that they would be opposed to any type of construction in the front yard areas regardless of restrictions or submittal of site plans. 8. In the future, it may be feasible to short plat this property and the adjacent property as indicated by Mr. Greene. However, this shall only be accomplished when there is concurrence by adjacent property owners to proceed with this subdivision as it will change the character of the area and infringe on certain property rights. • RECOMMENDATION: _ For each of the above reasons, recommendation of the Hearing Examiner is to deny the submitted application. ORDERED THIS 21st day of March, 1977 . F,P)1&a217-,r4e-sZA s L. Mtadt Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of March, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Gary A. Greene Bev G. Morrison William I. Mendenhall Charles Shane Karl Morrison TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of March, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3071 , Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before March 29 , 1977 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the 'Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by. such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 15 , 1977 APPLICANT: GARY A. GREENE FILE NO. : SHORT PLAT NO. 018-77 ; EXCEPTION NO. E-019-77 ; WAIVER NO . W-020-77 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a two-lot short plat , together with an exception from the Subdivision Ordinance to allow the short plat with a 20 foot private easement to the proposed interior lot . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : GARY A. GREENE AND BEV G. MORRISON 2 . Applicant : Gary A. Greene 3 . Location : . Vicinity of 3011 Mountain View Ave . N . 4. Legal : Lots 62 and 63 , Blk "A, " Hillman ' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addi - tion to Seattle No . 1 , according to plat thereof. Detailed description available on file in the Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 21 ,000 sq . ft . land area and 15 ,000 sq . ft. water. 6 . Access : Mountain View Avenue N . 7 . Existing Zone : G-6000 8 . Existing Zoning G-6000 in Area : 9 . Comprehensive Single Family Residential Land Use Plan : 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chron- icle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The request for short plat , exception , and waiver is to permit the construction of a single family residence between the existing single family residence and the shoreline. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The area was platted many years ago into narrow lots extending from Mountain View Ave . N . to the Inner Harbor Line . The existing house was built on two such 30 foot wide lots . The house was constructed approximately 250 feet from the water ' s PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : GARY A. GREENE SHORT PLAT APPLICATION NO. 018-77 ; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO . E-019-77 ; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS APPLICATION NO . W-020-77 edge . The adjacent house to the north, was built in approxi - mately the ` same position , with a second house later construc'-' ted on the waterward portion of the lot subdivided from the front portion along Mountain View Ave. N . This area is called Coleman Point and is the only existing residential shoreline area in Renton that has such large lot depths to the water ' s edge . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site drops toward Lake Washington from Mountain View Ave . at a slope of approximately 6% , then levels off at approximately the center of the property . The overall elevation difference between the lower half and the upper half of the site is approximately 7- 10 feet . 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (Age ) - Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture , row crops , and urban development. 3 . Vegetation : Primarily species induced onto the site by man , together with lawn area . 4 . Wildlife : Various waterfowl and small rodents . 5 . Water: The site is adjacent to Lake Washington . 6 . Land Use : There is an existing single family residence on the site with approximately 250 feet of open space between the structure and the ,water ' s edge . There are single family residences both north and south of the subject site. Mountain View Ave. N . abuts the property on the east. The Burlington Northern Railroad right-of- way exists to the east of Mountain View Ave. N . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area, consists of single family residences, most of which are located on waterfront lots . Except for the area imme- diately on Coleman Point, most of the homes have been con- structed on lots with a relatively small amount of develop- able area . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" sanitary sewer main and a 6" water. main are available to .the subject site . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department and subject to City of Renton requirements . 3 . Transit: Metro Transit Route No . 240 operates along Lake Washington Blvd. and Burnett Ave . N . 4. Schools : The site is within 3/4 mile of Kennydale Elemen- tary School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within 1/4 mile of Kennydale Beach Park and Lake Washington Beach Park. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : GARY A. GREENE SHORT PLAT APPLICATION NO . 018-77 ; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO . E-019-77 ; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS APPLICATION NO. W-020-77 H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-729 , "G" General Classification District 2 . 4-706 , R-.l Residence Single Family I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Subdivision Regulations : a. Section 9-1105 , Plat Requirements for Short Subdivisions b. Section 9-1108 , 23 . A(9) , Private Streets and Reserve Stripes • c . Section 9-1108 , 23 . F d . Section 9-1109 , Exceptions J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : The subject proposal will remove a certain amount of soil and increase runoff through the addition of more impervious sur- faces to the site. K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : The additional residence to the area will create new social interactions . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 as amended (RCW 43 . 21C) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the subject . proposal (see attached) . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A visinity .map and site map are attached. N . DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed lot sizes are. approximately 10 ,500 square feet each , exceeding the requirement of 6 ,000 square feet for the G-6000 zone. 2 . The applicant proposes to construct a low profile residence on the proposed lot. This combined with the elevation difference of adjacent properties , should not significantly impact the view waterward from adjacent properties . How- ever , height restrictions should be considered . 3 . The property immediately to the north of the subject site has been subdivided in a similar arrangement and a house constructed on . a pipestem-type lot. The applicant pro- poses to use this pipestem as an access easement to t'he proposed interior lot. The proposed overall width of this easement is 20 feet , which complies with the 20 foot mini- mum pipestem width of the Sibdivision Ordinance . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 15 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : GARY A. GREENE SHORT PLAT__..APPLICATION NO .. 018-77 ; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE APPLICATION NO . E-019-77 ; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS APPLICATION NO . W-020-77 4. The applicant proposes to pave approximately 6 feet in addition to the existing 9 foot wide paved area to provide a total paved driveway width of approximately 15 feet . All city departments , including the Fire Department , have no objections to the short plat , exception , and waiver . 5 . It may also be possible for the property owner to the south to subdivide in a similar manner . However , it does not appear to have sufficient width between structures on either side to facilitate a suitable driveway easement or pipestem. Therefore , the granting of the subject request may not set a precedent in the area . 6 . No curbs , gutters , or sidewalks exist along Mountain View Ave . N . The applicant has agreed to establish restrictive covenants requiring participation of the subject property in any LID for such improvements . 7 . Sewer and water are available to the site . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the short plat and exception to permit the private easement as proposed subject to : 1 . Final Planning Department approval of site plan design and elevation of any structure constructed on the site , with particular emphasis on height control. to protect the views of adjacent properties . (Suggested maximum height of 15-18 feet. ) 2 . Access and utility easements shall be filed with the short plat. The access easement shall be a minimum 20 feet in width and be permanently surfaced to a width of 15 feet to allow proper fire , emergency , and vehicular access . Recommend denial of the subject waiver request as per Public Works Department comment and granting of an indefinite deferral subject to filing of restrictive covenants with the subject property to ensure its participation in a future LID for such off-site improvements . /7 - ' 74 407,N.'GT JI L `1t.. '‘,::\ 9 07 `1 '� 1 i/ // ' 87 ,05 s - -.-- 1 \. es •os j ,L,z_ �G al 4 �� P i{�' k i02 ...__ V I I 6 1 1 I '' /// 89 ' '1 80 Epp/7 o 1" © ._..97 •.• 1 ' f/ G..l b .-- 1 / r 76 111 9S 1 —9 �" 9 1._ _� .0 1 _ ' T •. / _I'I,J•I+-lml'r"o'`I n.'I.ilTwi!_ + G9 < Z III.I•1,1-I,Io 7..I,,Z, ,' .�.I,,I1.�.�.1„.•w LL x+ -- 70 o / L 1- 'rr'�'g r ,l lfl 'ffr"r,,_ _—_ _-_I I _`^° Z a, / m? ;yarn I Zr . 1./ / � 111 . • IiIf1111111P\ - I 66 " Q m 11 .—e ci J11SS111111)fi11111�1iJ�d---- —; • — / ( a ��i��11 I I [ r I I 1 I I III * �- mWatm•. 111111111111T1 111111111 I .Z iot� 1 # �IL�.#,1 I1��1 IiI � e � .minimum II ,� I. /J .c,„.1/1, r. . .1,,.. mum awn II 1. . sI: !I ' „ i 'PNiiiii 111 11_ Ir►' . 41cc� Nisi • 1 L* tilUT' &1 'C 411 0 11 I. : , . , P�F,c Boa \I Titi),,, 5u acecer PRop. , - \\, _1 1 it IG e..712,1 a 52 11111 , 1II1I1111�111 i7 � I Let` I 410 \ /:� ;918.1* o -L*". .a 41' I : 1 - -..\\ \ x1 /7 01. • —W 295 te2 /'4 �, \ w n 2 . II I ; \1 - IR z i ei1 _WQ I \ 337 ,7a I "34 785 7 1 ‘\\ \ eu I axe 1. i r SHORT PLAT; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: GARY A. AND JOAN GREENE ; File Nos . 018-77 , E-019-77 , W-020-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mountain View Avenue North . APPLICANT GARY A. & JOAN GREENE TOTAL AREA ± . 25 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Mountain View Avenue North EX? s-11NG ZONING • G-6000, Single Family Residential EXISTING USE Single Family Residential PROPOSED uSr Single Family Residential _ - COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS i a ./..--Th // /1"---* / ( // •A r/ /6% r' o / '/11/ 1-7 z 41' . j 44 ��; Ny, -5aR9 ir. 14 ," � _�.- 1---- N, 3 ND 3T 1---L,, r.4 ( *) , f TO'�p I ri e Ib _,.....- ! v.., z • , ,, - i / __---:- --- ---. 1, = (3 ____- ,.. ...:____ s. , b t- /; /pn1Gceia Z tor-...- 1--r•07.-01;---Ii „,-- 'mew t i 4. v-e -3 N. 30TH - ��'i7rTr• \ ' - - - - • \ .'n. ‘ ®• 4 SCALE i"=Z00' u&JECT SITE Mi . . ...- .. . . • . A rrLican* - 6ARy A- 4 Jop TIE. 3 c PLAT No. o18-77 W..k.ivE No , w- °Lo-7T x1/4.:.r4,41dH - E - oil -77 PROPOSED/FINAL DE`LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/N.... 'SIGNIFICANCE . Short Plat No . 018-77 Exception No . E-019-77 Waiver of Off-site Application No . Improvements File W-020-77 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-216-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Application for a two-lot short plat approval ; approval for exception from the Subdivision Ordinance for a 204 private easement to the proposed interior lot; and application for waiver of off-site improvements . Proponent Gary A. Greene _ Location of Proposal Vicinity of 3011 Mountain View Avenue North Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ® have ED not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0. is ® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : • • Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : . • • Responsible Official Gordon Y . .,Ericksen Title Planfq D ', ec o� Date 3-3-77 ,ot Signature . i/fL/„• t1 City of Renton • Planning Department 5-76 ,? /14 . /%-2 7" 4648 89th Avenue Southeast Mercer Island, Washington 98040' February 10, 1977 Planning Department City of Renton City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 Attention: Hearing Examiner and City Council REQUEST FOR WAIVER FOR OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS I refer to the attached letter to the Renton Planning Department regarding "An Exception to a Short Plat off an Easement," and property described therein. In connection with this short plat application we request a waiver of off-site improvements which we feel are unnecessary. There are no off-site improvements on Mountain View Avenue North at this time. If in the future they are required by the City of Renton, we will be willing to participate. 116"."4"</Vg"*"4"- Gary A. Greene, Applicant O F RFN �o FEB 16 1977 A. 4YjNG DE PRE u %-/ �E- /!/O. .c-LJ/I 77 10. • 41;C'9/76/ 4 . i/.Z'/7 4648 89th Avenue Southeast Mercer Island, Washington 98040, February 10, 1977 OF RF Planning Department �� /); City of Renton . RECEIVED City Hall Renton, Washington 98055 FEB 16 1977 Attention: Hearing Examiner and City Council tv 2 NjNG DEP 1" EXCEPTION TO SHORT PLAT OFF AN EASEMENT - We are requesting an exception to the subdivision ordinance to allow a 2 lot short plat with access provided by private ease- ment to one of the lots. We feel this request is justified for the following reasons. • The subject property was purchased by B.G. and Sylvia Morrison in 1947, and they have been sole owners since. Mr. and Mrs. Morrison have deeded the.west 188' together with second-class shoreline adjoining to Gary and Joan Greene, for - the purpose of building a low-profile home thereon. The ad- joining property to the north is owned by Robert Burr, who has access by private road from Mountain View Avenue North. Mr. Robert Burr has agreed to grant an easement for access to the west 188' of subject property and B.G. Morrison is willing to grant a 3' easement paralleling said road in order to give said easement a 20' width, and paved road a 16' width. To date a recent survey of proposed easement has not been made by a qualified engineer. If this is necessary please inform us. We know of two or three otiler,properties on Mountain View Avenue North where two houses have ,joint access''from Mountain View Avenue North far less desirable than this proposal submitted. With this proposal we are filing a covenant to agree to build a low-profile (one story) house, so that the view from adjoining properties will not be impaired. I P I 4, J When Ted Jones owned the Burr property approximately fifteen years ago, he agreed to a joint easement with Mr. Morrison. However, it was not anticipated that zoning regulations would subsequently be made to prohibit this action without a request for variance. Mr. Burr is in the process of building an addition to his home and is in urgent need of new underground utility lines for his property. We propose to work together in this regard. We feel that the proposed subdivision of this property to build a. low-profile house would not be contrary to the city's comprehensive plan, as the zoning is residential in this area. The lot is 188' x 60' and is larger than minimum size for a single dwelling. The access to the lot will certainly be large enough for vehicles, utilities, fire protection and water supply. The sewer line has already been established on this lot. Gary A. Greene, Applicant • I 0 rK r DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS , WHEREAS , Gary A. Greene Joan Greene B.G. Morrison , Sylvia Z. Morrison are the owners 'of the following real property in the City :of Renton , ` 10 0• County of King , State . of Washington , described as Exhibit 'A,' .' attached •here.to . ,,, WHEREAS , the owner( s ) of said described property desire' to ,,.'• 7 impose the ' ollowing restrictive covenants running with 'the' land as 'f : ;' to use , present a.nd future , of the above described real property . NOW , THEREFORE , the aforesaid owner( s ) hereby establish , g'r,an,t and i mpose restrictions and covenants running with the land. ,. ., hereinabove, ;described with respect to the use by -the undersigned , is their:successors , heirs , and assigns as follows : INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The r ownes ) of the above described property , their' suc- , : cessors , heirs and assigns , hereby agree and covenant to . ..; - participate in , sign a petition in support of , and accept • 'j, any future Local Improvement District ( LID) or city 'i'ni ti a- ',• ted proposal , and pay their fair share therefore , for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements •',, required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance . Said improve- ments-: shall include but may not be limited to the instal 1 a- ``dj street paving san'i tar'y, ms., „;"'_` .;,.. ti,on of curbs , gutters , sidewalks , :' ,?.., .::.a : sewers storm sewers , undergrounding of uti1i,ties•,• s^;„'iz =µ • •:;.. street fighting - -,: are i m osed in lieu of Secti on. 9 1r10 _( ), 3 .,:.,,��: r,N �.; These covenants p ='`'-' 1 28 of the City of `Rent•on' ;`'� � 'rc' ` , of:Title.le. IX of Ordinance # 6 . •: ,,. "',"z:-;r;K :;; - L ..',..:.F..za. I/pp 0, 6 /kG DEPAR'c�� - r - ai r r` DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2025 . If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants , the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining. , subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . Gary A. Greene Joan Greene B.G. Morrison , Sylvia Z. Morrison i'' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • COUNTY OF KING On this day of .eZ cz 19,. before �me • personally appeared _r,"7•>,ot..-2//:7&i/Lp. /COO A.P1/1(JV _.) '76( %/71;LQA--/X./ the person (s ) who executed the within and foregoing instrument , and . acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary deed of said person the uses :'::> :.:;,; :;.;.:::`,;.y• FYw;4°,�>, ,«,;, P e fh penti oned n (s ) for h and purposes there„'i :�: INWITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set m , . • y .hand; and affixed my wri t'ten . "rc:•,,,',.,, x;'c-C4 �`official seal the day and year first above y;. No ry Public ,,..:,.. in and for of Washington , residingt' \\. • CITY OF RENTON • PLAT AP TION 7 pF RF4/� sip,-I /7/41 RECEIUEo 4 'SHORT PLAT FILE NO. if- 7' ' � MAJOR PLAT DATE REC 'D TENTATIVE FEB 16 197-t FEE $/#4 Oe • >SD ; LSO PRELIMINARY - �Z RECEIPT NO . / // Z iY7 • FINAL 94/ '9 SM NO . �ING DE?PY PUD NO. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : 1. Plat Name & Location 3011 Whi. mountain View Avenue North Legal Description Attached 2 . No. Lots 2 Total Acreage1], ,280 negoningG-6000 3. Owner Gary A. and Joan Greene Phone AD 2 9261 Address 4648 89th Avenue Southeast, Mercer Island, Washington 98040 4 . . Engineer Phone Address • 5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed • Telephone Electric Street Lights Natural Gas TV Cable 6. Sanitation & Water: Cg City Water / x/k Sanitary Sewers /7 Water District No. /7 Dry Sewers /7 Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance + , • 8 . DATE REFERRED TO : ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG . STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION : SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 10 . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL, PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION : PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT , APPEALED EXPIRED 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE DATE BOND NO. & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT v Planning Dept . Rr. v . 1 2/7.l • • IN THE COUNTY OF KING, .°',� :'i° ='h •'. STATE OF W�l$HINGTO� �`:sr 's+r" ',?; fir ?.J West lots sixty-two (62) and si �} 1,. -,h : block 188 ' Y sixty-three:>.;(63) d•; "A" , Hillman' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden •, Addition to Seattle No. 1 , according to '+ a''. ion plat thereof ,,,;�s recordedin Volume II of '�;aw:: • _ `:plats, :page 63, records of. '7. " ';r, , f'. said county; `Fin' ''�'i TOGETHER with Second ;f4"' • r'"N Ri class shorelands `adjoining, :'asrs� " : ',�;. establishedby decree entered October 19 192 " ;1�' ' ,-" ;`f"}j. r:` 3► in ,-1 :,: ?..;, CountySuperior :,:,, King Court Cause No. 156371. • r' .ty;�,y3.: '::L r`, is • ._ 1 i j AFFIDAVIT ni I , , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information 'd: herewith submitted are in all respects truce and, corr.ect to the best of my knowledge and belief. i `: B.G. Morrison • . _.,_}} _.--_-- -_.� .a-- - - - ----k- - _-:,,Subscribed and sworn before me l - Sylvia Z. Morrison .• . this / day o ,1 / , 1977 ' � cs�' .� 2P ,/ .r7�' 1/1 Notary Public in and for the State of ✓ J•'-1 Greene ✓ (,_, ( 04 ' • P,ashington, ,residing at_ �` P �� 1 �rL�' .. t 4 ' Gary A. Greene ,r' (Signat e of .Owned .. 1)<10(. 14 .11A.,.. .J (Na, of P3otarsy" Public) ~ _ p "� � i � ? l7�� v �"' / aa y 4648 89th S.E. (Address) " • (Address) : Mercer Island, Washington 98040 (City) (State) AD2 - 9261 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) ' CERTIFICATION , • This is to certify t the foregoing application has been,,,'. nspect,eed..by;,.'m e, ',ig and has been fou EfFbici rough and complete in every ' par.t,icular. andto;; ' conform to the es - d lations of the Renton Planning: Department „,,- governing the inp / pplication• • . . . <. 1 Date Receive 6 1977 , 19 By: • NG DEPPi Renton Planning De;)t: . • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • QF" R ENS, ENVIRONMENTAL c)%\b) ' • iP • . - CHECKLIST FORM AL. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SXe,-i /d/c 71 d/./- 77 yNIv/NG DS'? ,` ' Application Pio. E-v/y.- 77 � Gei-d'.o- 77 ° ' ' Environmental Checklist No. e /_ -Tic" - 77 . '' -. .PROPOSED;. date: FINAL , date: ''` D•Declaration of Significance Declaration, of Significance , eclaration of Non-Significance 'Declarationf N oon-Sigt,D nificance COMMENTS:' :1,. 4' kr;. - ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - ----- -- - - --- Introduction , The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.2TC, RCW, ;.requires F;',al.l` state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both :.fort';;heir. ,..2,:,:,:,, , .,,,....,,-, ;r:':own 'actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an;E1S,. be '• '' prepared for all major actions .significagtly affecting the quality of the- environme,nt. :. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies;"involved determine whether or'=;not a proposal' is such a major action'. <' , • .- Pl.ease;answer the' following questions as,'completelyras''io'u can with theyinformation?'. .' . ! '..presen'tly available to you. :-;Where explanations of your answers ;+are required, or' where' you,':betieve an explanation would be helpful to government decis4on makers, include.'your " ,s explanation in the space provided, or use-;'edditional,,pages if necessary. ' You should include references any reports or studies of which, you are aware and which are revile- • . ' „ ' ' vent to,�the answers .you provide Complete 'answers -to:,these questions now will help;al l agenci;es:1'.involved, with your',;'p,,roposal to undertake the;;required 'environmental review,,:::W:ith- .. out unfeces'sary delay. '?'' r ., -' >, ,;',.:-,: '.';Sri r ' . The .following questions- apply,, to your total proposal ,`;not just''.;t,d; the ,l,i.cense fo'r. h;,,ch .:' ou' are'"- applying w.,, .y y: applying or: the proposal',;,,for whicjl:a,pprova.l .i sought: Youra'nswers u:4,' "' sho.uld 'inc'l'ude the impacts which will be caused by your proposal '.when it is completed, even though comple.t;io;n,may no:t occur untill;,sometime; in the fut,ure,. Thi.s:wi;l.l allow&.®11 ,•� ; of the 'agencies which will be involved toT°:complete.,'their environmental .revi'ew now.,°:;wi:th- a.,t ' ' out duplicating paperwork in;�`-•the future. tb - T '•NOTE: This is a standard form being used'.aby all state and local ?agenc,i;es •..in the St'e,te ":.of, Washington for_various types of proposals. Many of. the questions• may :not apply °:;tip;. .> ;;'i Y:, ,'your proposal . If;'a question does not aoply�,1 answer it "n.,, and continue on te.4,the next question. :.>. . ; • :;�:�t,, f ENVIRONMENTAL' .CHECKLIST FORM' ' :°;,I BACKGROUND i,` :i ,z .. ' :I';. .,,Name of'' Proponent„Gary A. n ;''. ' rt: a �;='Joan Greene :'' - ; ''` 2'. • Address and phone,. number of reponent. ,, .? • .,, ," ,• 4648 89th S.E. `Mercer Island, Washington 9804 '�.0 '':Phop .6 e' #AD 2 - 92 st' n 3: Date Checklist submitted ., ';'1 ': , ' s« .'., i, 4 Agency ,'requiring Checklist ,_,Of Renton, Planning,:Department �s= • ,,; 5. Name of proposal ,,:'I f appl i ca.b;1` -= . . r� ..; .) gi,' �'�, ' 6. : Naturei.and brief description,;of the proposal (in,cludt:`ng but not limited tO- its . f:.'. ., size, general design •elementsv;and other •factors that-1w111 give' an accurate • ,-,w understanding of .i`;ts' scope 'endl';nature) i'�'• ��:;'.�' :d-' ' $!Subdivision of allot a]lowiag alotshort plat gth ac�e$s pro�id Ol by ', : a private 20' easement road":to one of'the lots. 'Each lot will be 60 • • 188' with only one."lot having 60' on'Lake Washington. (See attached-Map with legal description). The purpose' is for•build'ing a low, profiler�house on the' water front lot, located approximately 50''from the 'lake front. , ' -2- ?^ 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting 'of the proposal , as ,1wel1 , as the extent of the land area affected by' any environmental impacts,. i'nc1uding '„h: any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- '-,'r;°.;" ;.%, mental settingof the proposal • ' : A water front property loacted at 3011 Mountain 'View Avenue North; , tnton, ;;:f;,, ; Washington, 98055. The lot is planted with grass at this time and'.'ll as a — ' gentle slope to the water. is • 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : t . ' Six months after acceptence by Renton Planning. Department. -"` ,p, • 9. List of all permits,' licenses or government approva.l_!•;' requl!redfor .the t'roposal " `;••: '.'.'':'.;,. (f• ederal , state end local --including rezones) : ' � , . . At this time we are applying for a subdivision. of property. If approved ' we will be applying for building permits, etc. 't- �_"_'' '10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion:, or further activi- y , . `- related to or connected with this proposal? If es, ex lai•nc , Yll, Do you,;know of any plans by others which may.'^affect'„,the property covered;.,by • •r your Proposal? f '` p.. P yes, explain ' _ ' +4 z,T,r, .; , • di,;, " ,'R: 12. AttaCW';''a'ny''other%L' ppl icatlon .:form that ihAs` been co41;eted regarding, the ';p.ro- -' osalf ' p ,:', if none h'a.s .been completed, but .iss';'expected,,to'"be filed at some :f,o'ture date,'•:descri be Oid`nature'of `such appl.fca:t on- form:= (; ;,;'±;';. _ We are' in the process of 'filing a short` plat' apptcation to the 'City- of Renton Plannins';.:Department ;(''; CI I. 'ENV'I RONMENTAL IMPACT; di' ,� i t i fi;.' ;�•' ;e u u,'' a u' :k,,dt' ,. � ' (Explanations of';,all •Y yes , :an maybe 'answers ire dquired') '.:1•7 i ' r-• , '. ;h., • "' Earth. Will the:r" r o i �'' ( `) proposal es'u;lt n f4; t;;;. ' :',.•,-;• ,''`"`y" (a) Unstable earth conditions,.or in changes in';geol;ogic "A. '' : subst`ructur'e$? ;t `; ','s:; MAYBE ,, ' ' : ;:?' • Y; ;:r< (b) 0i.'s-ruptions.,'` displacements, compaction or over ';;, - `;-' covering of the soil? ,,V • :a ,:.K'; ;' a. ' ;x-Y T WA.B• E'V 0 (c) Change in topography -or'„g`round surface relief '"'' . features? ,. d The:destruct:ion coveri.n: `or modi'f•ication of an; _r. 'r ' ;it `i'. ( ) , ,g';;,, .. .y.,; . .� ,t ' unique. geol�o,gic or gh,ys; ;cial features? "' xX ,• ,; q:�.• rt ;: '.,., 11,t': Y;••w ,y2n;" MAYBE :,A'i3- (e) Anyincreas,„ in ;-''or= Wa.'er x•.;.. ;.:, ,' ;;,` . e,;, windt ero i_o -of sollsk" " either o n o.r-'.o.f f• the s i:te'•?`, ",'-..f.- ` ' XX ,•,;. ;P!S MAYBE•:.;, j " • ,,y., k; . '(f) Changes in ;;depos,ition,,ors erosion -o-f; beach sands, or ;,2,r ' a changes ini'sl':ltation�':°deposition 'or' erosion which ., may.modify `the channel' ,of:ra river or;r.stream or,ithe . '!'r;• bed of the ocean: or any bay, inler:or' lake? .' ;` 'rt�,: b" ;. rc • M1',,;,:',:.: •.:.V'- MAYBE Explanation. . ' - Driveway. .and house' foundation;(B) only. . P` ,: ' '; '' •' ', . '-',,,f4;• . ,..-:,!" .!-,,,: , :. ',.kir,,• -:'••‘,.'",•-'770.,,,;'; • 1. . - .;.,,;,...:,',!':i. ..,,. ..:, • . ,,,.. . ., . . , . • . , ';',..,::';:: '.. .7 • . , . , , • —3- '-'.,;..-:. • ,.., • .-;,‘":-.' • . : , ‘„,',1:"....' . • , , . ,:!„•,4:.•-•-• . . (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: . , . , ::',--,'„r•i-'„ . . . • , • ,.., (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air . • - • • • . - quality? . .. . 5!...,'• , „ -,,,---.,,, : '' •.,,';'.1i2L '..i.'- ' !,...,:,-.:'''.'.';... ., , . : .. • 'YES MAYBE :.110 .„ , ..,,,,,- .- ,•,. • - • ., ,, ' . ..- •, , v...-ri, i..,-. . . . • ., . . . (b) The creation of objectionable odors? • ' • ' '• ,,- iitic . . yrs—, RATIE•-•,',Far , ... .• , . . • „ . .. . . , ,- , „'.'•`,`,,,, :':. "(...i-.,- ....,,.., . . . , . , - • (c) Alteration of. air movement, moisture Or temperat,9'ye. .' ,,. , . . or any change, in climate, either locally or •e.:: regionally? .: . • • . . , Al-ciiIT•:••Iti 0 s, • ,:;?..,.''-'---•' . . , ' ' , , .,;-!,...t . '' . , ' , .- •,. - - ,,,,... : . ••Explanation: . •- • ,', !:•.• -'.'-'. ' ., _ ';,, . . . .1. • •••.-,$,,,: ','“ 1• : -••••-• ,,-;'-',- • , . . • -. , . . :•' ,., ;:, • ',/'-• '',.....• '.. -... -,!;', ;'..0!•• , .. . , . • . • ,.•••-.• • ,,,, . • • '..... . , ' ,"' ,'.:!'''' , • ' ' ." ;,-,s', ' •,...: ' • . , . ,.. .,. • , ., . • „",.,,',..0„,-..„, ,, • • ' . ' . . , '• ::.,;:ii, . , ., .. ')'''' . • • '''' '-'' . , . , . .. ., • ..... ., .•• P•, ., • , .,._ • 1 • s :.t,• . •. •,.. 1 - ' '' .'•:.,.!,': . ... , , . -- '''-i' • • '' , (3).', Water. Will the 'Proposal result in: • •", .-.. - ....;:•;:''', ' -..... -. , .•,., - -.• • .. ,,., ' ' n ., -,--'•'4.: '',•."• • ",":" ,•-.,-....c :•-• , " - . , . -• ••• 't''''',,' • ..,• • • ':. (a) Changes in cUrrents , or the course of rection .pf ., . • water movements, in either 'marine or. fresh waters'? . ',.-.,.' • , ' ,X -YES MAYBE ••'-,."; • •:"r-.:.-•••,-...2. ',-., ••. • . . , . , .... . ... ... , . ,. • . , . . . .• „ ....",.•-•?• , ' I• " :„,:, .'.'''';',:f.:- . . „. • ::r:`' ..'1.:'. ';', ) (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage•ripatterns,,,,er • : , : MAY :e ...„. . A..'.: .V''',,ft'. ' • %.-":...,d?,,•\,,.:.:1',,, the rate anCamount of 'surface wate'r, runoff?: •;', „„• -„. , ,TET- M • '.,r,tro- ,..• ..,,,....:-..,.,,,,,,,,, ,..w.. ,.. •,....;,, ,;•,i6.1,,.: :., - , -..,,,,,,,‘,:•?.•••:,,,,,...0i,,,:. ,,,... ..,x4-:•••':, ,- ..! :';'.- . . • ., ••, •,,, xx , • .. , Vr „ . • , . ,,,. .„:....,, ..,.• , (c) Alterations to' the courSe":•;or flow of, 'flood waters? ',,., • ______. . . - ,,,,. , , . :-..,...1:',,,'", • . ' '.- .. . YES MAYBE '.,";'.?:Np .:',,,:.•'. ,,, , •,'' ' (d) Change in the amount OffiAiface wateli.Jn ,any to i.; &' ,..: : 'n . '"...4;.,;,--,•%--y,',';',',,..;ti ... .. .. • ...;',-. -,-'...xx• '.. ..,:..,..--.$,If.;.::,,-:,.,..;,,,,,'.body? :••-..,;! ' ' ',-;.•'''! '';'..--•':4'. •;!!'w-...- '';',-;;;'', .. ., . . • ', ,,,,......... •;','•:,‘,....,.•.:'...,-":•• • . . '',J.,..., •;-:- -- - ' ,'-',''''--t,',., • -TE37. MAYBE :•'•':;00 ' .!..--,-, . ''',.:1."-::;.: . •;'' : ,'''..."-4',';- ' :', ''''',.:,•,.::.'- . , . • I'..'.• .''''''''...',;'';' '''.'"::%.. .;Y; '',"-!. :',3;',.M '.::'...:.' .'‘ . ;''''.. ,0...4.';,... . , • .'. ': ,'. ''.' ' • .' '..:(e.) Discharge in:te:,,..surface',' wa!fers , or ili-.:-any a 1.teraqon 7,-.• • ••:.:-..... 4.fclt,, sdr-rface wate,i-/qual i ty, including but not 1 imi t,e):1,,:••,..tp ...,:,,i- ' •-•• !-i-liX ''•'' - - teMperature;::',iii ssol ved.:oxygen or turbidity? ' :•••'••‘:i's,'. ' • •' ,:.,,-,.-•. ;..--,•;".i''..- ' ••••• •i'..-.--_-„--.1":". '.'' ' -, . - , ,'*,,i„E: ,,• . .. -•'- '• ,,,, ''.c..-,''•''.. • • •• '• '1?.'z, • YES . ..MAYBE ..ji-0 tilL `i -•,i•,?'',',,,, • '•- •-•:;,;-."•;.'s,, - •••.-- - . .-:S.,',:' •.-,:.,•:,:.•,;.':, ..,•-••;',. ' ..,.,, ., , • •-: '4,4, .•, (f) Alteration of the direction or rate:-,offi:flow •of,A-.1-i, ground waters?, :1. "-:_,'-',•,i.;•:: ,..2t.;,.k;, - ,,:. .:: ,4t,' .).-'1-•',L . • -i:' -:,?-!?ilk ... ".,.....,-, r., ...-,--!,,fr;.1:., • • ..:•--•-,64...,,,.,- ri-Es7 • M A Y B F,_ .'-,..'.',4711177., : :...1',..7,.• • -,,.- ,. il.'",,i':,',,,,', ',..-.,-',: ' •..-,:.,,i..: •- •; ',.-,', '"7 *.• ...?-71-.; •-•-•' '/Q ' '' ,.- .,,. . . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either .:.; ', ."-- ::::: • .'.... through direct. additions or withdrawals, or thrf4cah - , • •• "., '''.': '1'.:.1fX • . ' iniei..ceptionpl an aqul'Oe'.,:b'y cuts,,gr'.7:excavatiOKV, .....,.,... -. .,,,,,, ,,c:,,I,J,.. ''.:' . ', .,,...,.:?. y.e s RV-a-CE :-...Kr . :,...'.,.....-. ....,-- .....-,,,, ,..-.,,.;::. ..,: .-• .;i'..,'::....:',5'(h) De'te r.i o r a t i on''.',i•n ground water qualift'Y:7 ,e i ther tiaiiugh "'-''''-' •:. ,....;•.,e, ", - ,•••.;.'it...„.=- -'r•-l'i.:-:,•,':-,....,:;,• ,- ,,,,,,...2„,.., • .,: .,f,...;,:,;:.,-ti,,,,:,,, • direct injec:tlion, or thropgliothe seepage of I ea,Chiate, -.:,,.: .„-.,... ' - ..-':,-.J:; ' ' ?..- ,..:. -..:,•:"...••',"...4.4';',',..."- , ..-...„).,,:',' phosphates , “cr.etergents,0,4•00bohie"VrUs or bacteria, •_ '..;-','• ,; ;',„. ', '';:,,•,",.-., or other substances into tli;e: ground waters? •-• .1;;;••! " ''' .'„;!;.',XX .' •' ':'12•-i'' ';• 1,:'-'•'',.'[. .:ii,'',..:-,':- :'',....:-. '. -f,',-.: - '''i;'.-!,'•-..t.' r,•,.;?,^,..;* itt17-7-: AriiTE'l:A.6 . •• . ..,,,•..,. • ..f.-- ...'.-„,...., ..:.•.. :: ..i.-:....,:-.-..2- •,...-., . ., .,.:..,....,....;.c..,,, ,, ,,,:i:.. . ."-:....;:.,.;.i.. ,............. , ,,,,, -:,vi.,-..,..:;,.• - • ,-;.,-..,q.,•,, .,?..; ... ,. .,,,,....:•--..... (i ) Reduction in the amount:'Ot2,-,water otherwise available •,. •-:4.• :: ,: :..,;•;..,---,;'•-''','''-''' fr.,.N;.•'.-•-• '• -:',..!...:',',.,.v.,;'. " for public w4ite'r •supplies?,'; i•,' I. -: i .4,,‘,:.' •• ;Ai. . .... :',/{1 : •, -- '.;-..,,::.. -:-,:: • ,.. -•- tET- MAYBE ,;;:.IPT- '• s:'.'':',',.:' :,-,.:,:.•. .,. :.. ...•,,,.. , . -...,:;:::-.....;:,',.,` ,, •':,..- Explanation •, , ,,-,..,.,-;;:• kjJF4ED. 1 .49,-E4,.',7- t.A. E_- - '4",'•-',--% , :'.,..••,;,,.••,,.. . ..,... •:;::.: '''.? '''• •.:,.,•i,•,'";,'...",;;•:i, '''": -•: ':',,;:?' • , .J.-.•:',:i.„•,. . • • = • • • .. ,;Q• ,,,,, , . ,•'',",-.:";..:::,''? yz;,.....-.--, -.,.•:,.;:$.„,. , •., .?"-- 7.'19,-; - -----'.',,'••.-;,, 0,- , -,"-,:-/..+1-,,, , ‘• e:-.A'f- ' '..:1.....'-',4" '- ''2:-;:r. ',.:.V.r.:',.0,; ...'.::‘,'VS!''. . ;..q•S • .- -. ....::,''''':,''', •.. (4)-'.'41 o r a. '''',.'W,f I 1'the proposal result .1 n ..., '.,-'.'n,-' ..,•.-.1,..c.%,-,,,.„, •fr. . • •` .. -,'": ' (a) Change in the,.?:::diversi diversity of-.species or numbers, of any ., , ,',--.••,' species of fl;Pra, (inclUdlifg',',,trees,',shrubs , grass } ,,,,',,,crops .,. -,•;•, .„ . , ... _ ,- . mic'r. ofl.ora and aqua t i tpaii.ts)? .'',.,;!',i' fp',,. a •' :' . ',-. .-.:.•,t'!'l -.. ,1.-.:•, ..,. •-„:,,.•:!•,-•., 1.--, • ''' :.!,:f.f... .. rET7 MAYBE j0 .. ;.•-i.:.,!..,..- ..,,.?.;,,.',‘,-, ; 1 f'*.'-',:;;;,,:i,v,h,,, „ ; ',,,'- :'-.-: .1,,y:•:.4...,...-• -- -,..i.kzie:, • .,.. ;,-.-,•' •'-, ',,,,i'...'Cl; (b) Reduction of 'the numbers of,,any unique, rare oi..q.-7. ., . , , . A. ,•,., endangered species of fl-oiia' i l , „,.. r'..;:•-'1,' ,.'• : • . .1X, '','_''''t' • ', ......K,,.. .,„— .,--4.-: • .''•'.- ''' '.-.?.,.2,i: Yrr- MAYBE' 4411- , ,„ , ,-, •. , --:.,;t,,,,,,':.-.,- -',,,,,'..4'.. J ' ':,•' t,i'';...` .44.. (c) Introduction.",'9f new species• of flora into an area' , or ' • -:.`,.`,,,-',. .,, . ., ,., in7,wT-..'bi-rrier'-.7.,,fei."-lthe normal replenishment of existing '''-'," •- -••• ••; • •,„.„ species? ,;;,..zthi , '..!‘',"?.•.- „ . . ,. . ' .-)CX -., , ,.. • -.-i;-",- ' . -''''.?: ,‘ ..,,, Te7. MAYBE ' O . . • • 'Y.,..., .. ;9,,,,.:,.' ..•, ,(d) Reduction ina.credge of'ariy,.. 'agricultural crop?'''''',-,;',,",.. • ''• 4C-X. . „ • , ,. " N.,,,,I,:,,!,. . •.:,•:;:„.,,,;.',.:1,,,-,:;,• _ , ,,- ..,..,..,.:,-,:' ,:• -..,..„:2:1',,'.• airES7, MAYBE i11T.7 .e•.." :..".,,Vi •',,i.':' O..J,?''' ., '.4, ,!,:•,:. ' ':'./1 :',L, .•.: .- •'' ' Explanation n: The',,ilot is in, grass now, and this will be reduced by the'size . , . - '• ,,,,..,:, ,,.. .-..x.' , 0:;.-.i..:, , :-',....--,,, ''', ,.... .. . - ,-..K,i,,• .,.... .. , '. - . - of the hons_e '-.), ,. . .• _ ... .• :',,,,‘,,!,:,. . , . • . „ __ • I ,-.• ''-:, • •:, ,. . .• , ..._......___.. ............„...—...._ : --•' ,.••• • ...„. - - . . , . • --, • ., ,, ‘••! ..,.„,. . •' •.• ---,---„-- . . . '•,--,•';.',- __,....„......._ , ., , ,•: . • . • . ,•,,,,. - ',:-,': , • • . ,, . . . , . . • . . ., . • , ., .. . • . , , . . . . .• , ':,';',,,,,:,',.,., • i ,, 2... „ , •-•-• • . . , , . . . -. ' •!...,-, . .•. . .. .. . . ., ....__ . .______ . ....._. _____. . ._. . ._. .,...... _. . . . . ..... ' • • • • _ , t• -4.- , (5) Fauna. Wi11 the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of,. ' :;;sr.. any species of :fauna (birds, land animals including ±•' :=> - , reptiles, fish'and shellfish. benthic organisms, • insects or microfauna)?' � s:' HAYBE= ,,ti i' (b) Reduction of the numbers Of 'any unique, rare or ' °Y . endangered species of faun�i : XX YES' MAYBE NV M,i (c) Introduction of new species'of fauna into an area`-, '' or result in a barrier to the migration or. mo,vement , `' '" of .fauna? • XX^' •:::,:,«. VET- MAYBE N;O(d) Deterioration to existing or wildlife habitat,?;A'.('',: .• 'ill— MAYBE,', N Q-' Explanation. . , , . .... ? (6, ,Y Noise, Will the proposal increase existing noise ''leve:l'S,.? . "`` X'Xi;, '.` .1: .Explanation: ' ;a" produce pew. g ;:or; ' 1,`.• (T�)'- Light and •.G1 are. Will the proposal p � light `�i.,i'.'' `'' ' ' glare? �1; ,,'.1..f7 Y: • ��f.'.,.. ` t 1.",i_` •'6`..,ta_' 'j,°S:)'r;, - - TG'J MAYBE ¢\V":• ,. �'. .. tl � xlr •�vi`rr.}7; J,; •,fj�". . : • iEx_p 1 a n a t-i:on ,,;:.:'.r >' r.,. ; ' i., •'':a • y.,,• .4,'V..t y. - , it, v. ,t ' ,.,, ,. Jteration (f the (8)',,,,FLand Use'fi , `,Wi'l l th@ proposal • r'esult in the:-,a x ;" xpriesent 'io`r 'planned, land use of' a'n area? '?' <<: 'Y » ' v' ' ..'. , :1.' - DES - M YBE ' •'. • ry J :t. Explanat'io'n: .. :G ',' . °A` "' ' rt1:�) w,r.�...; i! a A....,,. .£; _i;.' :,': i ( •7 •i0' • :'s re,'µ ,t.'.,• .,y-: - `} • '9� `•�Na'Natural '�' •ounces '' :Will the 'ro .osal re,su�lt.;.in'. ^'•,;';,' • Y; ,;1', ,.,•: ......, • . • .,fir.' ry.. 1-;:s• i'. a 1 u e s 7 Xx.),' ' �t �'r.: `(a)� ln.cr:ease in the'>�:.rate of. 'use`�of any n,at, r reso 1^`r_„, �t� ;, !, '. 'tit. r, XX : .* q: - f nonrenewable natural`,r; source �'. , Expl anati.on `r a' .:1 _b; :?:: :'. ;,:,,,.' y .. ',(10:),. ;,Risk of !Upset. Dos•;'the:,propg_sdj''•i nvol vex a;,:,risk of ankS;,;: '�, ' ,4,- `'; ;explosion"',-o'r. - the release ofl h ziard,ous substances' ('incl<u,dng, ; r_t,: %h ,•'; �" - but not,limited to ''oa'l�;Ipestici'Qes•, chemicals or rad.ii�tion }� -, A1 in the event of an;:i,ac'ci''dent 'or u aet condi't'•ions? '••',,,, ri` PI: _• MAYBE` i.k �'I:r. it �(- :r4. ,It,;.`,„= a �,Ystl'xi' - i "i! • . ';?11:, Explanat'A�on; rr4.. .u'` %, • :i�p�t f. .:�,.';,1'. `:^'�p;G 1.r (11),i:.Population:` Will 'the.'proposal, aa:ter the 'Location. dist:r'"i- ��;. button, .density, or.,,growth. rate. of the human::.population.::, .of an area?:' ;' S+.: ' ;'i`t. '�`" MAYBE • ...„')Explanation: j6'<:` : _ ::r v Liar .. �,. . . _ ._ • t� '- V9 • ,, r , • • -5- , (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? '`U`XX YES MAYBE ,`;NO Explanation: , 4• (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result: ln : . (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? ' YES RITE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand = ' for new parking? =:1XX :.` TES— MAYBE NQ .., (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? - ' X • Y- — . N O (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or.:',., ) e` • movement of people and/or goods? :,XX. , ,.'}' DES " MAYBE .: ,(e) .Alterations to waterbornerail or air' traffic? ' XX S MAYBE N0. , . (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor •ve,hicles, . . ' bicyclists or •pedestrians? '. ,_. ''XX ;R; C YES MAYBE' :A ,,' •' Explanation (a") JM .�±r �� U O Cii ! -holy. .: >, ; . (14) , P_ubl is Services. '.Will the proposal have an `;effect upon, or , ' ' - ' : - result in a need for new or• alte'r�ed governmental services `: in any of the following areas . - (a) Fire protectiLgn? `` 'XX • .- AV,,,A: • YES M YBE,• 'N,q. , ' (b) Police protection? XX YES AY BE. NO, .-. (c) Schools? ...`t' = . YES MAYBE NIL (d) Parks or other: recreationa'l .facilities? :• X {. . `.4 i'i! , , . `''' YES MAYBE NO,:, ' - . ', , ',(e) Maintenance of; public faci•l.ities , including roads-?'': ,:„,., YES MAYBE NO ,s' s? a , XX, (f) Other governmental service Sn,: YES' MM �1r`i Explanation. ."-Iv' v�WW'. (15) Energy Will the proposal result' in ':;. (a) Use of substantial amountsfof fuel or energy? _ XX YES MAYBE ' MT (b) Dema'nd upon existlpg souoce .of energy, or require' XX' thedevelopmentof ,riew surceof energy? ' ,.., . .. Explanation'. a,. ( 16) Utilities-, . Will the,'' proposal result,•in a. need for new,l ' systems , or alterations to the following utilities : • ' (a) Power or natural gas? XX YEr- MIT NO':'- t: • (b) Communications.-systems? •:.r. ' • XX‘'.:: YES MAYBE PLO:';', • ( • c) Wate'r.? • XX: YES MAYBE NO.: • {{ -6- • • (d) Sewer or septic tanks? XX -,'YES ' MAYBE ,i:PRO • ' (e) Storm water drainage? • `tt'XX . :YES MAY$£,%v`N'G ' • ' (f) Solid waste•and disposal? , •.XX YES MAYBE,: r�O Explanation _ , (i7) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of ' • '?e''.' any health hazard or potential health hazard (excludi:ng • mental health)? :'•XX • — MAYBE, N0 Explanation: .N _ _,,, ( 14) • Aesthetics. Will the proposal "result in the obstruction of " i, }`„' any scenic vista or view open ,to the public, or willthe' '` < -,' proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically 'offensive site open to public view? • ~YES MAYBE '.,0. Explanation - t('il� • ( 19) Recreation. WHY:the proposal l 'result in an; impact 'iWn the r`;.., . quality or quantity-of existing recreational opportu'ni,.ties? ... X '' "YES MAYBE "``N:0 Explanationt:' ti. tt r (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result ;i;,ti' an ""`' _-,., alteration of a significant archeological"'or historical site, structure, object or b.ulld'1 g?' ' :+,-,;',. tX ;:'; YES MAYBE '::iN•0 .{,•, Explanat'i'on ' - ;, III , SIGMAT {"'t. URE s,,,.'' Y. '"i� ire 'I , the ,undersigned', state that 'to the best�,of my -knowledge the above information' ' ' is true and 'complete. ''.I',t' is understood that`, the' lead agency may withdraw any:4!decla- "; ration of non.-significance that it might issue in reliancea°,upon this checklis'ti;should there be any-willful misrepresentation or willful lack of Mull disclosure on my-part. • a ,4.• :Ar4Aonent. 4 1 ;r.r: .(Signed :. GARY A;. G EENE ',: . ' (name printed) :<T- d'j'4: ,, a • • City of Renton Planning' Department ' .s, 5'_76 ,t LOT � � 59 ✓ �� ✓ / SAVOY 60 • i� i tTPI�OPbsED R°Nr ,/ --1 I t3u� f u �Y 6J R]:S..._ C� PAVED AT-- T i7' PRFsE�1T 2ci OVERALL EASEMENT POST f GARAGE-ARFt�SZT 3'EASEMNM 62 . (----1 . _ . . 4 - _-- morzwsoN 3 _ rzEst cE 63 /PD,ST 'PROPOSED // 0 �} ?JEW F-40uSE.� — GREENS - v�RE51 DEl�10E = l- — i .000or R1=S 1DE1�1�E 65 gegekk i i -. SC ALE.- I.- 0' SHORT PLAT WFST- IsS' La► StX.-TY TWb(62)4 SIx-Y THRic.C65), . .. BLOCK Y AZn HI L_LAAAN'S LAKE WP..St-44NG 1 GARDEM OF Eb> P,DDfl1O 1 To sEATrLE tJo• l PIXORDIt.2 . TO PLAT -t1-4ERE RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS,PPG _G , PElDRDS OF SAID COL,1KTY TOGETHER. W ITHS 1D CLASS SNCRElANDS - = . _ " PCLONI NG,As Es-rABusHED 6Y DF�.GRE _ ENITRED Ocin19,1923 N1 KwGtM`( c oJRT C U5E NO- 156371 ? 0NE(6tE)NT 3, 1 ' FMSLON ,tWOa2) '4. , NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 15 , 19 77 , AT 9 : 00 A . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . APPLICATION FOR TWO LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL ; file No . 018-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 2 . APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE ; file No . E-019-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 3 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR TWO LOT SHORT PLAT; file No . W-020-77 ; property located in vicinity of 3011 Mt . View Ave . No . 4 . REZONE FROM G-6000 TO R-3 ; file No . R-022-77 ; property located between Lake Washington and Ripley Lane North adjacent to and north of Misty Cove Apartments . 5 . SITE APPROVAL IN M-P ZONE ; file No . SA-021-77 ; property located on north side of S . W. 7th St . west of Hormel Co . facility and east of the Earlington Golf Course and railroad spur track . Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in Renton. Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 15 , 1977 AT 9 : 00 A . M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR PUBLISHED March 4 , 1977 CERTIFICATION Michael L . Smith , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn �} to before me , a Notary Public , / 7:1 on the 1st day of March `f"y / 1977 . SIGNED 1 ice',,e: I • • ., THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE:SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT O 235-2550 February 25 , 1977 Gary A. Greene 4648 - 89th Ave . S . E . Mercer Island , WA 98040 -RE : NOTICE OF APP-LICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL, FILE NO. 018-77; EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, FILE NO. E-019077; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, FILE NO. W-020-77 Gentlemen : -he Renton Planning Department formally accepted the azave mentioned application on February 16 , 1977 . A p �lic hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner h=s been set for March 15 , 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre- sent . All interested persons are invited to attend the he=_rina . If you have any further questions , please call t-= Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director By : ?.,... 44,67;/ Mi heel L . Smith Associate Planner wr ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED /1 7? PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMITS _ WAIVE R SHORELINE MANAGEMENT � PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE `r�0-.574? SIGNATURE OR INITAL /2 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE 711--- UILDING Z--- - , E fA-L.'\ TRAFFIC EN, . L---- P/ :--„ E/x; , 'NGINEERING 2/z 77 FIRE ,. Sx CM/11,4'4Y 7-� -/77 H EcrALTH :j.111 CS) L-- 7/ z f '1 REVIEWER ' S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :' ,S iL.(.:_ C{Li).j`1/yj(_:.,�:1-3 -C' )il4C ..'l 111C1-1 (-!mot C .)4i41 11 (f 'i;)- /f CC"�ss/ /II/nW/-;� CiT72�-i3�f dI S,/,P .y, C r i�'C j2av �4 GC�ci�/� /5y f7%6': Z'<f( / ,5. 6 /3• .?c/ ) PLEASE SIGN THE E . I . W . : ENDING OF FILE Fig nnE ./A V3,(4i6 O1ô-77