Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA99-048i RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION i 4 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 616 WEST PERIMETER ROAD, RENTON, WA., 95055 p. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: x4 , 1\\ 072305-9007-0I CC\\ m 1- l PROPOBAL\\ EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING: Q [_3arti \ PUBLIC (P-1) 08004`>• • SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM DESIGNATION: n o•n URBAN 11 O 0( can l I l iiAV11 • . Ils41047#. IIII itT 111" i o '+ w= Y 1 ",DRAWING LIST: era z SHEET DESCRIPTION n„ ...w.a__ . I fi 1 ' G1 COVER SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX iinn-• C2 DEMOLITION PUN D IOWA FXi PI , C4 PROPOSED w ro dA QIM . h m Ili I oW II II W d us II cn 11=1 z o 1 i. II wD: SSTE MAP SCALE:1•-200' (APPROXIMATE) o SEA LE N FEET GST xao o zao ,ao 5 AS SHOWN GPMG1 NOTE I . ••• IF L"DOES NOT MEASURE 1" °".FEB lION ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. L\AA\RM\O3ONno-Col DO .'•`°24-9E-030 hREMOVE OLD DECK & BULKHEAD 25.0'- „ PROPOSED SHEET PILES 23.0'-H f PROPOSED FLOAT 16n FREEBOARD (TYP) H Y HIGH LAKE LEVEL 21.0'- H H 1 Z n Y LOW LAKE LEVEL 19.0'- U n 1 EXIST. GROUND 15.0'- y faW 13.0'- I 1 I 1 ROPOSED PILE PROPOSED DREDGE SLOPE II A SECTION SCALE: HORI.: 1'..5' VERT.: 1'-5' IREMOVE OLD DECK & BULKHEAD I 25 0'- 4.25 TRANSRION RAMP 1 23.0'- H GRATED SURFACE 16n FREEBOARD (TYP) HIGH LAKE LEVEL 21.0'- H H Zip LOW LAKE LEVEL 19.0'- 1.I ri EXIST. GROUND 17.0'- I 1 N..V.e:G 4 ,..^ I PROPOSED FLOAT 15.0'- I13. 0'-- I PROPOSED SHEET I PILE BULKHEAD I I PROPOSED DREDGE SLOPE I I EXIST. WOOD BULKHEAD J PROPOSED PILE W/CONC. CAP B D SECTION W SCALE: HORI.: .5' VERT.: 1'=5' NOTE: THIS DRAWING SHOWN AT HALF SCALE. RENTON SEAPLANE BASE DES. SCALE AS NOTED SHEET NO. DR. GPM F.B. 1728134thStreetSW•Suite 200 Reid i d d l eto n Everett, Washington 98204 CH. DATE 2/11/99 Ph: 425 741-3800 FILE NO. I:\24\98\030\4830-006.DWG OF 2 SHEETS CLASS C ROCKS 2 11 CLASS B ROCKS L q rTt y`t 23.0'— 1 S s'••. g HW=22' 21.0'— 6 I.Vhr fir« •:.w• ;4,. 19.0'— I \fl¢atKi .i•Vteel` •'i i%r-,r-,io.,. 17.0'— I Vs.:.\7\`,f \..., M«..••••: 7e,4y. FILTER FABRIC I I 44s6P;' `•'NI.:: ^"j 15.0'— I I 11 '+ t• t ai:,J1 6 2 \\' i i0 1 13.0'— QUARRY SPALLS fill SECTION SCALE: HORI.: 1%.5' VERT.: 1'-5' NOTE: THIS DRAWING SHOWN AT HALF SCALE. RENTON SEAPLANE BASE DES. SCALE AS NOTED SHEET NO. 2 DR. GPM F.B. Reid i d d I eto n 728tt, 9•Suite 200WashingtothStreet n CH. DATE 2/1 1/99 Ph: 425141-3800 FILE NO. I:\24\96\030\4830-006.DWG OF 2 SHEETS k7:-..--,;..... sl.,... ........ .... 1 1. I s•s //:...,1. I. 4:".•'../..:••,-....-- --: - ''''" - •'" . IT 7.7-11- 1 i ' z.,-,••,`,„ wk. " 7//,/,////.."--.- - --- - -- --•• __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ 0 I • • " 14tILLgt,i, - i. .. . • I.. I r•-'''''° -Z Sl• MP - 1-0 I- 1---•s. " m nr---7-7-7- , . . 4 , r----• ITf....1s.J. ..i.rk:......1 .• . . ..... .. f --- ,. iy., s• bOUBL E HOSECI1k J . 1 g______i th. Pl. -L 1-. -._\ \ I \BIBB AT HEAD OFI 1C 1-1„ : ' I i , 1 1,...i " ' i I I- - 7-1 • 1 • TAP i EX I-STI N-G R-AM P.-- I I Igi 'L.1 E.'I-7S ' 16thr ql- .1 ' ' - \ 1 9,..01‘.- • , 4 . 4 : 1141 1.40 1/4447 - ,_, ._ ...\ .. _1 L : w•1 , • . . 7 -,--, ... t•-i _ t; 11,---1, k, 1I17. . if 1-8j 1 r/th- ' I:- -- - ' -' ..' ' a I i ......._ i - • IS! .....j- ---•-,11---1. t 4 1i- Lijj2 5- 1 1 •to 2" WATER SERVICE1I k.1• 1 IA L: '71 , '. : ._.1 .1 .1 .1:771- 772 IA. i i It* 1 ;1 ,•, , 1 \\ ...e.• Vi 00il •LT777 ...I 1 S ' j 1 arSti-,17-7-13 I 1 • k \1 corir--7-7-7-1 . i • , : 1- r -S,.. 1 F-•• t::i Ljr 1:0 irthth--st .--- - --- , ' I, --s I . Z 3 ...........: r- ----t,- 7 ....-.___----- - -,... A i4DC .. 'VILi....• I i 1 , 1 ,---), 1 , 1---1-.. -. . Jr,-,,t-, i\j -, . ! 1-s 11120th -SLICA ''''''' J 1 2.1$- 12.2...1 St: - - ::''''''' ' T hi 1 1•21st-- -. S . 1 PailiiiiN22 - • ' L i . -. -- Li :_... . . .. ; J St. Ll6 i : W 7th SE - . I 1.! !?41.2t(11 4 Ism 8 UZI N TO --txre- Ivi•-:--, 6" i.- 1, :,,, aI "T ' • • • ' • '''' --- • - 1 :74,2_3_f_ci 6.•PI. ; . T i rcul --1'i I s: \ p•z. 16"/ "iss------,-----1 i 6.•i---E -; 1--•• P I.': ji.-• .-...- A''1-1.-. 1. \, co. 1 DET.#6 4.-} ,,i-J \ c•-• WI all 1 N41sip------7-, ...,,!-.- ' , i rlini.„--,...---- -, - ---- IA',.1. ' ..1 6th tsi......:wily #1 1 ,,-, F‘A‘Ii,.... ..,-•\ • 'yr I's 4.,-.2i ! --::---- -.;-----.., iii J4- if-Lis 1.-81 126h St l'-- ---:7. c 1 1 ...1323 '. 13" 1-.'\ , .I.•...' . ... .....1.121‘ 1I. i \'''''':-.....,‘ 15.:::::\- 1-ti.•-61. !.117... .. '. 1 01.45th'SI-1 \4'. r- i l .,-**. . ..'',..•''. \•.1.7 1 i %,t6 pL,'"---2-1----7.i s"\. A ;1 11113 i ....., ... /..;: i... ! . -.p. I i s,.......4•75,....!"... "-- ".t a 1 I 1 S 6; I ••,.. 13111 % -• 71! . I 1217 1-.- 19'\\• 't - --- .q 1 \-:' 1' 1 1.1Cd • le4\ !".3 > ...7. , s, ois IN 4404 •I --- es.-I -7.•.•-!i -. 1 7 - 7 ...0). 't,„ sq. D. !to Ei 1, \ 13.14. 0 - . 1 21 • 1 5. --- I 1/NrAth ' • - . .% "'l'' tr, 1 : -... on-1., I3I. 6- 11: 15 134 I 1 341::, 7:4-17). ,:7"; Off -•uri411 1 9 6f9- 0 5318 W 1/2 5318 E 0 dITIESDIVISION 4 - • UTILITIES DIVISION P/B/Pw nctufic.m.=vimrecaNiCALERVICES 1:•+Wen 02/25/91 vUV 1, 1 u ri Renton Seaplane Base is ehabtat oRilii n: Q00 O' jQ C Neighborhood Detail Map Bryn Mawr Se r District(Utility). a r,-- Project Area at Will Rogers- i „_ _._„_._„_„_„_ Wiley Post Memorial j n o f a" Seaplane Base tJ s'1'}` nI ii , , ,'', a r'' V J Residential) r\ la- 1 ,°' ' VEDO ii7J-)in O O O O . bldgs,roads,docks and pavement11111IvapproximatepropertylinesNS\\\\ , - ..000 Renton city Emit line 7 — I I \ irli project area N r L 1 The La sh re D a , C2' C Do M i At 1 D JE 1 Drawn By: Ketil Freeman 0 mrair III 3/5/99 4CI Il 0 0\'.-) Reid iddleton Renton Municipal Airport Loam j////A AREA TO BE DEMOLISHED BUU(HEBO TO BE DEMOLISHED CITY UMffS PROPERTY BOUNDARY 5 ESMT/JS LAKE WASHINGTON WIDTH NOT KNOWN F j o 1 EXISTING FLOATING DOCK TO REAM REMOVE EXISTING DOCK REMOVE EXISTING RAMP BUCK RNEft STORM DRAIN II OUTFALL AND FLAP GATE I El i ///. fl Pp. am CITY UNIT LINE APPRO%IMATE UMR W OF WOOD BFACBE Q PLATFORM,TO BEI I m Z DESTROYED JQ o Z 0EXISTINGBUILDINGTOTALOVER—WATER w a p COVERAGE TO BE o F- REMOVED 12,500 S.F. 0 Vz Cr woz il SWE w0 E 1bJ AS SHOW N' w GPMm R i C2F aNOTE: IF 7-DOES NOT MEASURE 1' ..JAN.1999 ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. c\N\w\NA,•Els9-O,..ems a 24-90-030 J FrWCN PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS 1 0. 1—--_WIDT ESMT/35NNOTi--- -- -- KNOWN 1 1 PHASE 11: L I I RwnNO DOCK I I 1 1 I yy I I F\ I EXISTING BOATING DOCK TO REAWN LAKE WASHINGTON PZ\ T%- REMOVE EXISTING CONC. APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF PROPOSED DREDGING BOAT SECTION AND REPLACE WRH DEBRIS ilk Vialiblib.„ FI----131 OPENING WITH GRATING r DEBRIS OPENING PROPOSED BOATING DOCK \ AIN GRATED SURFACE AIM ACCESS RAMP • I 1 i iEi: IIi' BI1ii__ _ II I_.At/ CITY LIMIT LINE- F PARR EXIST.STORM WGATE.INSTALL NEW ONC.ACCESS RAMP EXTEND BULKHEAD ACCESSPIER 0 DECKING VI Z S w QQANKiIN' BW(IIFAD m ATER , MNEW ROCK LILJ EXISTING BUILDING SLOPE PROTEcnoN-a w COSTING CONRETE BWOIEAD ACCESS RAMP Z egg , o TOTAL NEW AREA OF N COVERAGE = 5,200 S.F. o p c, z a 0 0 a I ceI 1 sou of Far R30 0 A b m AS SHOWN S CPI/ NOTE: --_ ra - w. IF'L'DOES NOT MEASURE 1' .FEB.I999 ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. A30P ...MG bNI\6 \-C 24-9B-030 — 1 ./ / U cam- N'\ 111 0 f1-1-1-1-1- j ..i-,_, Renton Seaplane BaseIIILI _ I ' p Rehabilitation: u u-urn-„.u u ,u u. uu ' n ,u u `n u u u u 0 0 O Neighborhood Detail Map Bryn Mawr Se r District (Utility) a v II Project Area at Will Rogers- Wiley\ N, I II I II.II.II.....,.,,.,, a II I II V 11 II II„II I.II..I,I.II.t, Wiley Post Memorial uisiaas631 Seaplane Base5° n•a i • 1 i' ,1 i f e {riTriirp y esi I en a o. Oo 0 n\\ bldgs, roads, docks and pavementa14\\mil `' `\ t roe lines 4 ijis approxima e P Py MN11 1,En,1I/11MI1,„11MI„UM11 11„11 11 1. 1 i ... OO T--\\ O° --- Renton citylimit line_` project area z. 0 0 lip\co The La 1 re a. - i• \ 1 i N t. , \0 I 4 , Drawn B; , Ketil Freeman I Ii 3/5/99 c YoFNTA Mq RF r0N`fvG t 1 Iii iii yi1 0 Z'' )0 0 0 a1 Reid iddleton Renton Municipal Airport r I I i HtNTuN muNikji.,, AL AIFIHO HT 0 c, SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION PROPERTY ADDRESS:g I 616 WEST PERIMETER ROAD, RENTON, WA., 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: 1 I4, 602 072305-9007-0 3 H PROPOSAL \ EXISTING AND PROPOSED ZONING: C SITE PUBLIC (P-1) CDaDSHORELINEMASTERPROGRAMDESIGNATION: 4p tiga URBAN 4,pI]t1.a d'd t 11 Ott e 1 5 V=F- tit),,qi A CD CC0.\ 0 II ,,,, it s —mg--,1 1;11 I 7.43:' 4:. 9741,,, 1 11 Ill it _I iy"iymi 1 c DRAWING UST: r` mil SHEET DESCRIPTION ii t—_,. r A2 G1 COVER SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX 0 II C2 DEMOLITION PLAN t1 11 _ ig, 1 C4 PROPOSED 0 N01Q 1 LEASE 9 I I . h m s J ' .. s Z W I Z W 1 I 1 • =-'-tparTJ2 u T II a vl 1 c t 1 = O III j{ N w I' V. 1 o 1 =_ =1u1 T T f = I Z U m crt L.-w1 + -, I P p,N;1NG o iriith _ _I_I s O ELOPM Lii Z i e CITY OF Rt.-ix mSSC'ALLEE: 11M'-Aio0' (APPROXIMATE)MAR 2 ' 1999 00 rr + SCALE IN FEET RECEIVEDHV/E 200 0 200 400 s`"" AS SHOWN I cs. sH[[r wo. 0 GPM G 1 PS NOTE: I L I IF ADJUST" DOES NOTES MEASUREREL1„ °A,E FEB. 1999 I:\24\98\030\4830—G01.DWG w`oE 24-98-030 LEGEND AREA TO BE DEMOLISHED BULKHEAD TO BE DEMOUSHED CITY UMTTS PROPERTY BOUNDARY 0 rc E_ WIDTHSNT #35 LAKE WASHINGTON T KNown/ o 3 Cli 8 3 EXISTING FLOATING DOCK TO REMAIN 3 N CO f` W REMOVE EXISTING DOCK REMOVE EXISTING RAMP C CU BLACK RIVER STORM DRAIN OUTFALL AND FLAP GATE fr Ate CU r 46 4r.r.nriv. 7 dre," /\etEl4. ----4...._______;44 Z________,.____.______.____.____d CITY UMIT LINE 41\ APPROXIMATE LIMIT N OF WOOD BEACHING m ZPLATFORM, TO BE le DESTROYED z CL EXISTING BUILDING TOTAL OVER-WATER a COVERAGE TO BE F_ 1 ID \ REMOVED = 12,500 S.F. JO U Z WO Z O 0 LJ N 4 ill, pEVE,OF RENTp 1 - 199 a 6 SCALE IN FEET C'V E "r` AS SHOWN RR V_L a..o 20 0 20 40 a.GPM C2r NOTE: I L" - I r' s .a.OI N IADJUSTDSCALES ACCORDINGLY. NOT MEASURE " °wrz 1999 I:\24\98\030\4830-C2r.DWG :Y 24-98-030 LEGEND\ PROPERTY BOUNDARY CITY LIMITS o ce r , iI 1 WIDTH NOT KNOWN I I I 1 I 1 I PHASE II: 1 I EXTEND EXISTING I I FLOATING DOCK I I 11 2 \ 1 I P.G EXISTING FLOATING DOCK TO REMAIN a LAKE WASHINGTON y9p\ 1;4: 2 31'\ N APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF REMOVE EXISTING CONC. r` CC FLOAT SECTION AND Aoh PROPOSED DREDGING REPLACe WITH DEBRIS NC. II,OPENING WITH GRATING r DEBRIS OPENING PROPOSED FLOATING DOCK WITH GRATED SURFACE 4-0 ACCESS P .- ------- 40.11 C4r 4::...1 limo ACCESS RAMP I If g•;;;•`, isi - L pino io--Te A j.; A ..._ A A A iMis 0 CITY LIMIT LINE---__________:\ REPAIR EXIST. STORM DRAIN CONC. ACCESS RAMPFLAPGATE. INSTALL NEW I ACCESS PIER AND DECKING EXTEND BULKHEAD TO FLAP GATE. x w GH WATER n Z AT BULKHEAD mNEWROCK SLOPE PROTECTION- d EXISTING BUILDING Z w REPAIR EXISTING ACCESS RAMP O Z HCONCRETEBULKHEADgw 4 N0 1 o: O GITOTALNEWAREAOF\ COVERAGE = 5,200 S.F. Z E S./ i....me -7 cK 2 NIA.Tos.N1,: c..; c,,, re 3o SCALE IN FEET MAR a`11 N L— AS SHOWN 20 0 20 40 ocs. s=r moo. m i GPM C4r F, NOTE: I : L. 1 i IF "L" DOES NOT MEASURE 1" °""FEB. 1999NADJUSTSCALESACCORDINGLY. I:\24\98\030\4830—C4r.DWG HoE 24-98-030 REMOVE OLD DECK & BULKHEAD 25.0'— ry PROPOSED SHEET PILES 23.0'— H ' PROPOSED FLOAT 16" FREEBOARD (TYP) 1-1 p HIGH LAKE LEVEL 21.0'— u v LOW LAKE LEVEL 19.0' U ini_I EXIST. GROUND 15.0'— II 13.0'— I I 1 1 ROPOSED PILE PROPOSED DREDGE SLOPE I I bl A SECTION SCALE: HORI.: 1"=5' VERT.: 1"-'5' REMOVE OLD DECK & BULKHEAD 25.0'— 4.25 TRANSMON RAMP 1 H GRATED SURFACE 16" FREEB ARD (TYP) 23.0'— HIGH LAKE LEVEL 21.0'— N LOW LAKE LEVEL u 19.0'— U EXIST. GROUND I IL__ r 17.0'— I 3 I PROPOSED FLOAT 15.0'— I 13.0'— I PROPOSED SHEET I I PROPOSED DREDGE SLOPEIPILEBULKHEAD 1 IA_EXIST. WOOD BULKHEAD PROPOSED PILE W/CONC. CAP B SECTION SCALE: HORI.: 1'-5' VERT.: 1"-5' DEVELOPMENT PLA, IN CITY OF RENTO NOTE: ATIHALF SCALE.HO R 2 1 199c, RENTON SEAPLANE BASE DES. SCALE AS NOTE[EC U'Ff DR. GPM F.B. 128 134th Street SW•Suite 2001 Reid i d d I eto n Everett,Washington 98204 CH. DATE 2/1 1/99 Ph: 425 141-3800 FILE NO. I:\24\98\030\4830-CO6.DWG OF 2 SHEETS CLASS C ROCKS 2 CLASS B ROCKS 25.0' . i%// ice'.' 23.0'- HW=22' 1 21.0'- w wwvw %%%j/j/%/V///i i i 17.0'- I \/ ///, p\\ •f:. i• 4w N FILTER FABRIC I I fig • ,hh G,I 15.0'- I I 1 wfil f t'J 1 bJ 2 \\O\%/i//'//° 1 QUARRY SPALLS 410 SECTION SCALE: HORI.: 1"=5' VERT.: 1"=5' DEVELOPMENT CITY OF RENTON MAR 2 ; 199k RFCEIVEr NOTE: THIS DRAWING SHOWN AT HALF SCALE. RENTON SEAPLANE BASE DES. SCALE AS NOTED SHEET NO. DR. GPM F.e. 2728134thStreetSW•Suite 200 Reid i d d I eto n Everett,Washington 98204 CH. DATE 2/1>/99 Ph: 425141-3800 FILE NO. I:\24\98\030\4830-006.DWG OF 2 SHEETS 11 IIt 1....,, s. I;; •I. 17- 1 • •1;'••Aff-l-•'•,':-.. _. __. _..... ...... .. .1 1 Ti I . I.- 1\ r--7,--r---7- r-r.---,--riL.: , . _ ...,_I I • * T....L.::l'ss ., 7 LL_ S . 1 1 41111L---$JJET 2: 7- 17-1.72::::::::** -• -- 5*-.;''''./._...- • . 0 i , 4.... \ sm. 1 r_ . m—h:-.-1 r---,--\L. 1...i...i.„._. ..,.. 1 J.., ... ! . : 11. Z 1_1_,.____Y_. ••15th St LI -..t•-• 10 j. 1365 s• DOUBLE 1-IOSE M If ! • I • CC--. H ! I — —i •J. . ITI. i._:.. 0 1 i._.; loth! PLO •-0 _ ...1 \ BIBB AT HEAD-1 k 1 EXISTING RAW11 , TAPIiI . r--1 f--7-ii • I I 9 6 ;,....., \\I 1-7-17:71-1 . .-1 .__i CLT--..._\ . •-• ... I'lfi ! , 1 ___„: _I--S - -i : : 16th-1Stir! - . . . . A \.1 .._‘ 4. .• . ------ 1 V‘71 [ ' i..i...;..--... ETF-T, -I i ril ---1.1 i 7.1 1 . •2" WATERIi7. . .' 1 S' 117th.-St.4 LL. , 4 •1 , . z.j Li..7.-...;(-77 1 I c., ---•-- -- J .6...-1-:-- 1 : • CO SERVICE tt%. %I- I t ! It7,0, 5. _Li L. 1. I I IT-.. ' 1 1 r----I F—.. .-1 ' ' • 1 ' 1, \\\---40,...,, 1... \ I1_ _„........,.........1 1 . •1 ! I S: i 7th Fl t...1_-j 1 1 'm i;27,cr) 44 1-- - •••,.. •••!-.• .,•i ...! i.. ..'..i : L.-- ---- --jr7- r- 54. ;•*ri 1 ‘`. .--"71 ' i I i S_LI 1 8 al !St- .71. - •r' '- 1350 \ . I3''/ il.I 77-17.-7-77-1 '".. -.• . 7::-.P \ Cv?--.)• k 1 CU111..- 1----IC 11. !..... 4. 3.- iftsgi till ...'"-SIEll..:71 :11. - Iti — — --.....-.---0 s i 1..... ...4....,..: . .1 1 .i..: . ... ,.... , .1._. i .......Lir ti 1' \ D. r .-----r-T7 r- - --,-- 7 ..... I \\j 1--1...;-..... 1 I 1.1?Dtth .Stl' —.1A_—i 1\, . 1"---7-s•-r---r-- r. _is.. . 1 .. _[.. z.....__i. I I 12.1§t St t-_-= -i T1..21..8 t-S k, \ A \\ rAN LI 112I1 , `,. ....... ! I I I 1 1 4 IIini123t1 ..'-' PI- ....--: 1-1 T.(191 :11 i I ss: \ , 1 72- 1 I 16 . • • ! : >4 . C15 , ' 16" uv 1 1,.ki112"-----.--- I 6-1 1 . i -" I .DETARi . .... . '27 • ci) 1 ' . H — 4_, 0.1.2.4th- 1 St'.-11 .'"-- -7- 1 .. i../1, • 11, j , i. 1._ ...., ..,...,, ., ,..ri.Lp.Itv-jii .11,,c)., ,,,,,r‘All.. .:.....6thSt...A. 12. .. 11),..?:e. 1.--•-.'. --• • • W-u 1 i •••••••-• Ilp rei 1 •--..../....... "...*.:/ i373.-....,, ...•t Iht.im 1124-'- j--'--. S' I25th St 4 4: . ‘ ... 41..tihL.....—---J.....1._ 1,. ,\ ... : 1.1.. . •\ %....13,23 111:-;-Th -; '07.4.;...„.. il, '. 1.- 5th \SI' .i c. -':..,--. \--4.•-111-6" 117- Lut ',,,. T--: NW 1 ..,... ••" ..,' ...• \. A7 •-•.! - I .....= 8-7 Air*.i 11285 i \,......-...:..... \ /. s. I ‘1 \.......4.•„;'''.•• .-- -I-I 66IMENT DEvEL.).-- EN-roN, i I....4., ...... ,. ...?.._... ..„. (<...:., L.- tx, iv I::4....... ... 1.........„....,crry OF R 2 ; 1999 q i. - \....o• 1 1_,.1.:."- , s, ...>1sumttlII !.........., •C-.) .71 i I I INICU 'c I••16!"7- i• ! - . I.Crl •- 1 tIMI 4464III .. 0 i # ' ..: OE"- F•5 d 77;& \ I '"--1 1 • En...r , -1 ri "'•-• - i ‘ I .6 ._. s1511 13-- -. I 7". ... ‘ 1 I s I- Ni212s 4 ill 12 I-Mr:. ..rn\ iiir - REGEW 1 11' Irl 1 %131C: 37-1! 6" 13ii-c.. lit__ WI--' •Off -won. . t ..1 L in°li 9'.Pt 13' 1 9 6 n 11....._ ...... ! I !,......... .........:7.... 1°7- 19 I I 1 5318 I', /:0L11'- 7- -,e 5318 W 1/2 0 4 11141IN nil UTILITIES DIVISIONLITIESDIVISION V TECHNICAL SERVICES 1 I•4.11.trol 02125/977 99 - 048 es.4 sir 118000028506 118000840009 118000171504 BRYN MAWR PLAZA LLC BILL COLACURCIO JR THE LAKESHORE 11326 RAINIER AVE SOUTH 522 BOURBON STREET 11326 RAINIER AVE SOUTH SEATTLE WA 98178 NEW ORLEANS LA 70130 SEATTLE WA 98178 0723056666 WA ST DEPT OF NAT RESOURCES RESOURCE PLANNING PO BOX 47014 OLYMPIA WA 98504 RENTON LL j CITY (_ Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 17, 2001 Joe Armstrong P/B/PW Department; Transportation Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Expiration of Land Use Approval Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Project File No. LUA-99-048, SA-A, ECF, SM Dear Joe: This letter is written in response to your request for an extension of the Administrative Site Plan Approval and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project (see attached). The Site Plan Approval issued for the project on October 5, 1999 is subject to an expiration period of two years from the date of approval, which would be October 5, 2001. Upon request, a one- time only extension of the permit may be granted for a maximum of two additional years pursuant to RMC 4-9-200.J. Similarly, the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit granted for the project on December 14, 1999 must commence construction within two years of the filing date, or by December 14, 2001. A one year extension may be granted pursuant to RMC 4-9-190.J.2. The requested extensions have been granted. Therefore, an expiration date of October 5, 2003 has been retroactively applied to the Administrative Site Plan Approval issued for the project. In addition, the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit issued for the project will now have an expiration date of December 14, 2002. This will be the only extension granted for the project proposal and construction activities must commence within the specified timeframe (i.e., construction applications must be submitted, permits must be issued, and foundation inspections must be completed before the end of the two year period). In addition, the permit authorizing construction shall extend for a maximum of five years after the effective date of the shoreline permit; thereby requiring the completion of all aspects of the project by December 14, 2004. A single extension for a period of no more than one year may be granted pursuant to RMC section 4-9-190.J.3 to allow for construction completion. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact me at (425) 430-7270. Sincerely, esley Nishi i Project Manager cc: Land Use file Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner Department of Ecology APPEAL: This administrative land use decision will become final if the decision is not appealed within 14 days of the effective date of decision. An appeal of the decision must be filed within the 14 day appeal period (RCW 43.21.C.075(3); WAC 197-11-680). An appeal to the Hearing Examiner is governed by Title IV, Section 4-8-110,which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing on or before 5:00 PM on October 31,2001. Any appeal must be accompanied by a$75.00. Specific requirements for the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk's office. gento 1901 2001 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 C ti 0 This paper contains 50%recycled material,30%post consumer enteno-1 6 STA1' O 4.i" tiltC..Illlll, tllllf x n'illi i3p tsee o STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 December 30, 1999 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF RENTON Ms Gail Reed, Airport Manager City of Renton Airport JAIL 0 3 1999 616 W Perimeter Rd Renton WA 98055 RECEIVED Dear Ms. Reed: Re: City of Renton Permit# LUA-99-048SM RENTON CITY AIRPORT-Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit# 1999-NW-70027 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to restore deteriorated structures at the Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base including replacing bulkheads with sheet-pile,riprap, replacing beaching ramps with a float and access ramps, dredging 1800 cy under the former beaching ramp, and lengthening a pier, has been filed with this office by the City of Renton on December 14, 1999. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21-day appeal period, January 04, 2000. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, K-Y Su, Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program KS:ks SDP.DOC cc: Jana Huerter, City of Renton m 0 d CITY Ca2 RENTON lt Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Municipal Airport April 19, 2001 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Neil Watts,Director CITY OF RENTON Development Services Division City of Renton APR 2 0 2001 1055 South Grady Way Renton Washington 98055 RECEIVED Re: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation,LUA99-048, SA, SM,ECF Extension of Approval Request Dear Neil, This letter is to request an extension of approvals received from the City of Renton for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation project. The project received Site Plan Approval on October 5, 1999. A Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for the project was issued on December 9, 1999. It is my understanding that if construction has not commenced within two years of the Site Plan Approval date,an extension is required and may be granted by the approval body if"good cause" can be demonstrated(RMC 4-9-200K1). Likewise, if work has not commenced within two years of receiving a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit,a one year extension may be requested and granted(RMC 4-9-190J2). Following these approvals for the project by the City of Renton, application was made for federal concurrence. The National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)reviewed it for compliance with the Endangered Species Act, which was required following listing of the Chinook Salmon as threatened or endangered. Approval was received from NMFS only this month. This accounts for the two year period following initial Site Plan Approval to the present. Furthermore,NMFS, as a condition of their approval,requires that in-water work be accomplished within a"window" of time that must occur in November,due to fishery concerns. Therefore, work on this project, which, of necessity,is based on the federal approval, cannot be initiated prior to the end of the approval period. Therefore,I am hereby requesting a two-year extension of the Site Plan Approval for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation project to October 5, 2003. I am also requesting a one year extension of the Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation project to December 9, 2002. If you have any questions,please contact me at 430-7471. Thank you. Sincerely, OA / 41, G- Reed A s,trt Manager 616 West Perimeter Road-Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-7471 /FAX(425)430-7472 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer PUBLIC NOTICE r__.. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION OF AVAILABILITY OF WestManager, erimeterRoadnton lRenonAirport,l 616 WA ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS 98055, o r e-mail t u. Will Rogers—Wiley Post Memorial @ci.renton.wa.us.All comments Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the Seaplane Base(Renton)Renovation must be received by 5:00 pm, AugustTheRentonMunicipalAirportandthe 6,2001. Federal Aviation Administration Published in the South CountySOUTHCOUNTYJOURNALannouncetheavailabilityofaFinal JournalJuly tin5,2 the. 9324EnvironmentalAssessment (FEA) and 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 Finding of No Significant Impact FONSI) for the proposed Seaplane a dailynewspaper seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a le al Base ipre l Airport.t. p Theht at the ctR ll published9 Municipal Airport.project will newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six include removal of a damaged wood months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the plank beaching platform and English language continuallyas a dailynewspaper in Kent, KingCounty, associatede timber piling, replacement 9 Y of the beaching platform with a floating Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal dock, bulkhead repair, shoreline newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King protection, minor dredging, new grated decking over an existing flap gate, County. installation of minor water and The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County electrical service and installation of a Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the new fire hydrant. The purpose of the project is to provide adequate and safe subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a docking space for seaplanes currently using the Will Rogers-Wiley Post Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base Renovation Seaplane Base. The project will not result in an increase in number of on: 7/25/01 seaplanes using the facility or any as publishedchange to take-off and landing patterns. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of The FAA is providing funding 118.50, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. assistance for this project through the Airport Improvement program (AIR) with the City of Renton providing local The cost above includes a $6.00 fee for the printing of the affidavits. matching funds for the grant. - The Renton Municipal Airport •has Legal Number 9324 prepared a Final Environmental Assessment describing the project's likely environmental, social and economic consequences. The document will be available on July 19,AA,-:„_,_ 2001. Members of the public may inspect or obtain a copy of the Legal Clerk, South County Journal document at the .Renton Municipal Airport office, 616 West Perimeter Road, Renton WA 98055 and the City Subscribed and sworn before me on this day of r • , 2001 of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Customer Service Desk, 6th Floor, City Hall, 1055 South Grady ttnnrlrfrrr. Way, Renton, WA 98055. Copies, for f F `t ' review at the Renton Public Lilbrarry, 1llbe00MalAvenue F I\ South, Renton, WA 98055, and the C FAA - Seattle Airports District Office to, ( r1 1601 Lind Ave. SW, Renton WA 98055-4056). Requests for additional Notary Public of the State of Washington information, or to receive a copy by F,...\ residingin Renton mail, can be directed to Gail Reed, a: Airport Manager, Renton Municipal King County, Washington Airport, 616 West Perimeter Road,i• V9i-'•C,?G , .•—ca` Renton WA 98055, or by calling 425- ii F 6VAS‘‘ t 430-7471, riiiiiliitt t t Interested parties may submit written comments to Gail Reed, Airport CITY OF RENTON'. CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING ti On the 13i_ day of moo r , 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing sL.ov-elwve.. F .,wvAti documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing t a= ErD o1`f RPrck y`i Keev1 Reid IMkddle lyvL Signature of Sender) S ‘dta k- STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ra ,a k. S c% signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for th Gses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. MARILY 'q`1 " Notary Public i nd for the State of hington NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary (Pr ILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES My appoinFENTEXPIRES:6-29-03 JUNE 29,2003 Project Name: -Re si\Jco.v1 sea hav C3 se R ,alo,I Project Number: L'JP. • qq • 04,6 , SAN NOTARY DOC 41 CITY IF RENTON Il , ,Planning/Building/Public Works Departmentm. J sse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 10, 1999 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for File No. LUA-99-048;SA-A,SM,SM Dear Shoreline Coordinator: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on December 9, 1999. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at (425) 430-7286 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, f/tA41-) Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager Enclosures: Copy of Original Application Affidavit of Public Notice/Publication Site Plan SEPA Determination cc: Office of Attorney General City of Renton, Transportation Systems City of Renton, Utility Systems Applicant shltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 6:5 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%oost consumer t CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF DATE RECEIVED: March 26, 1999 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: April 19, 1999 DATE APPROVED: December 9, 1999 DATE DENIED: Not Applicable TYPE OF ACTION(S): X] Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit: rhis action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: City of Renton, attn: Gail Reed, Renton Airport Manager 616 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 PROJECT: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation 1 Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation: p.d. \ Neighborhood Detail Map U Bap Mawr r District(Utility) a I kdnewMAaB as Rogers- WileySeaplane BaseWeBaseB..e i ti\\\C\\\\\\\ N b1Ep,roadf.doclu.od p.vwmt 710„ 1\\\ U y OOOC Ifs/approdm.le property uoer p•—• Reorpa city emir live 7 1` l u//PreJM.re. N i' Ili\ "'I__II III Ir7Le<J reL Q O 1 I Qo Ii AN Q Q g Drawn BY Keul Freeman /BA 3/5/99 V3 cv j t:= 3//,/ ,_ r7_..'_-/ _/ I i:;41 I V D b` I 0 0- - Reid iddleton Renton Municipal Airport 1 I p' 1'111'1r1' l City of Renton P/B/PW Department ioreline Substantial Development Permit Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Page 2 of 3 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION:The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Roger-Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. Existing overwater structures include a deteriorated treated- wood seaplane beaching platform, an existing floating dock, and deteriorated wood bulkhead with a concrete cap. Upland portions of the site contain an existing vacant building with accessory parking. The project is necessary to rehabilitate deteriorated wood beaching platforms, which have been damaged over the past few years by storm activity. The project would be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of: demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock; installation of 3 access ramps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead; stabilization of 85 lineal feet of shore with rip-rap; installation of sheet pile along the face of the deteriorated wood bulkhead, then capping the bulkhead and sheet pile with concrete; installation of a new 200-foot by 10-foot grated float; and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Three gangways would be installed, two would provide access to the new float, and one would replace the existing access to the seaplane base above an existing storm drain. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Phase 2 work would require separate permitting later, when the applicant has determined a schedule for the improvements by the applicant. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" SEC-TWNP-R:Section 7, Township 23 North, Range 5 East WITHIN SHORELINES OF:Lake Washington APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 4-3-090J Urban Environment Page 3-25 4-3-090L1 Airports and Seaplane Bases Page 3-27 4-3-090L6 Dredging Page 3-29 4-3-090: Piers and Docks page 3-32 L12 shsbdv City of Renton P/B/PW Department oreline Substantial Development Permit Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Page 3 of 3 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1.The applicant coordinate with the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine whether a bio-engineered bank should be used in lieu of rip-rap for the proposed bank stabilization. 2.The applicant shall obtain a separate shoreline substantial development and environmental review for the Phase 2 portion of the proposal. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1.The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2.This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3.A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. Plannin /B ui di g/ Public /semii stra or 2Y 7 S t THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: APPROVED: DENIED: If Conditional Use, Section of the City's Shoreline Master Program authorizing the use: If Variance, Section(s) of the City's Shoreline Master Program being varied: This Conditional Use/Variance permit is approved/denied by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: Date Signature of Authorized Department Official cc: Attorney General's Office City of Renton, Plan Review(Neil Watts) City of Renton,Surface Water Utility(Ron Straka) Applicant shsbdv CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF DATE RECEIVED: March 26, 1999 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: April 19, 1999____, DATE APPROVED: Octoberer5, 1999 DATE DENIED: Not Applicable TYPE OF ACTION(S): X] Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Permit Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit: This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: City of Renton, attn: Gail Reed, Renton Airport Manager 616 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 PROJECT: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation CONCURRENCE DATE 1441 NAME 1 'ITIBAL/DATE 1.144 Wr wG) G- /2/ , hsbdv CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE:12/08/99 TO: Gregg Zimmerman FROM: Jennifer Henning aik SUBJECT: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Shoreline Permit The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the Renton Seaplane Base is attached for your review and approval. As you may recall,the Seaplane Base would be rehabilitated in two phases. The first phase consists of demolition of the seaplane platform, replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps,repair and extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of an existing slope with rip rap,and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Dredging of accumulated sediment would also occur. Phase 2 work would occur at some unspecified time in the future, and would include the extension of a floating dock by between 60 and 80 feet. However,the Shoreline Substantial Permit is only evaluating the Phase 1 work at this time. Please feel free to contact me at extension 7286 if you have any questions or concerns. H:\DIVISION.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.ING\PROJECTS\99-048.JTH\gzmemo.doc\cor D o ENT REPwow , ryv NOV 15 1999 RECEIVED WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF Natural Resources JENNIFER M.BELCHER Commissioner of Public Lands November 8, 1999 DIVEI.OPML-iv o in.ANNiNC( YOFRENID Nr,v 4 r_ 4e.p.„ Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Aquatic Lands Easement No. 22-090012, Renton Seaplane Base Dear Jennifer: I have reviewed the City of Renton's Determination of Non Significance for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation. I have reason to believe that the proposed dock extension will require an expansion of your easement with the Department of Natural Resources. In addition, a complete proposal for the improvements on the existing easement area is required. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. Sincerely eja7ut chuu Carol Cloen Aquatic Resources Manager cc/bh shared/Aquatics/Renton Seaplane SOUTH PUGET SOUND REGION 1950 FARMAN ST N I PO BOX 68 I ENUMCLAW, WA 98022-0068 FAX:(360)825-1672 I TTY:(360)825-6381 I TEL:(360)825-1631 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer RECYCLED PAPER CO CITY OF RENTON a Planning/Building/Public Works Department e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 27, 1999 Ms . Lyn Keenan Reid Middleton, Inc. 728— 134th Street SW, Suite 200 Everett, WA 98204 SUBJECT: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Project No. LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF Dear Ms. Keenan: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SM) will be forwarded to the Department of Ecology DOE)this week. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at(425)430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, nlfer Toth Hen roject Manager cc: City of Renton Airport/Owners Ms. Shannon Kinsella/Reid Middleton, Inc. FINAL 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 Thie nanar r•.nnrainc Sno%rnru,-I,d marnrial 9noG n..cr rnne me. REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: October 5, 1999 Prc iect Name: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Applicant: City of Renton Gail Reed, Airport Manager Owner: City of Renton File Number: LUA-99-048,SA- SM,ECF Prc Oct Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Prc Oct Description: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. The project would be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The project requires environmental review, a shoreline substantial development permit, and site plan approval. Federal permitting is also required, which triggers the need for preparation of a Biological Assessment since the project is located in fish-bearing waters. Project Location: 616 West Perimeter Road Exst. Bldg. Area SF:Not applicable Proposed New Bldg. Area SF:N/A Sit Area: Approx. 12,500 s.f. Total Building Area SF: N/A i' d 1- 1 r rJ\C•r •II v\,•<>\> Bryn Mawr Se rDRlrlrt(Ulllily) 6. L-- — --' —.- ': .—'---.—.-- - PrnJert Arrr<t N'ill RaRen-milsEntp•— — 111..w...—..— N'iley Pnet I.Iemnrinl l V nOIYItd WII • • r'° ' 4<Puk Serplrnr Bare 1:1' l 1 41 j 1 Ttri,...,,d1 jUn m f=3, V\l (_ o ,\ ,/1 i j j i O /, i I. Project Location Map A Q siterc 0 Renton\tunirip<I nirport City of Renton PB/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir ntal Review Committee Staff Report RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION L UA-99-048,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 5,1999 Page2 of 9 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base at the Renton Municipal Airport. Existing overwater structures include a deteriorated, treated-wood seaplane beaching platform, an existing floating dock, and a deteriorated wood bulkhead with a concrete cap. Upland portions of the site contain an existing vacant building with accessory parking. The project is necessary to rehabilitate deteriorated wood beaching platforms, which have recently been further damaged from storm activity. The existing beaching platforms can accommodate approximately five seaplanes. Capacity of the platform will not be changed as a result of the project. The project would occur in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of: the demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock; installation of three access ramps; repair and extension of an existing log bulkhead; stabilization of a slope along 85 feet of shore with rip rap; installation of sheet pile along the face of the deteriorated wood bulkhead, then capping the bulkhead and sheet piling with concrete; installation of a new 200-foot by 10-foot grated float approximately 30 feet from shore, at a water depth of 5 to 7 feet, that would cover 2,000 square feet; and, repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Three gangways would be installed, two would provide access to the new float, and one would replace the existing access to the concrete float. A 228 square foot grated deck platform would be installed on the west end of the seaplane base above the existing storm drain. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Construction is proposed to take place between October 1999 and 2000. The project requires the following environmental/land use permits from the City of Renton: environmental review; shoreline substantial development permit; and, administrative site plan approval. The majority of the project would occur over water in Lake Washington. All of the work would occur on city-owned lands. Some of the overwater portions of the project, while owned by City of Renton, are actually located in King County. Limited work would also occur on upland areas immediately adjacent to the lake. This work would include access ramps to the proposed floating docks and stabilization of an existing slope with rip-rap. No grading on the upland areas is proposed. However, dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would occur. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: siterc City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir ntal Review Committee Staff Report RENT)N SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION L UA-99-048,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 5,1999 Page3 of 9 1) Earth Impacts: The proposal would include some rehabilitation of seaplane base facilities on upland portions of the project site immediately adjacent to Lake Washington. No grading is proposed on the upland areas, therefore, no erosion or sedimentation impacts are expected to occur as a result of the project. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks is proposed. A temporary increase in water turbidity is anticipated to occur as a result of the dredging. The applicant will be required to limit the inwater work to specific times of the year or"fish windows" as determined by the State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (Fisheries) in order to diminish potential impacts to aquatic species. A barge-mounted clamshell bucket will be used to dredge the accumulated sediment. The dredged material will be stockpiled on the barge for transport off-site where dewatering and disposal would occur. The disposal site has not been identified, but would be a State approved facility. Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is required. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 2) Fish and Wildlife Impacts: The proposal includes rehabilitation of seaplane dock facilities and dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment from beneath the floating docks. Construction would occur both inwater and on upland areas immediately adjacent to Lake Washington. Demolition, dredging and construction in and adjacent to the water is subject to compliance with "fish windows" determined by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife for this portion of Lake Washington. The fish windows are established to protect aquatic resources. The applicant acknowledges that the proposal would result in a temporary increase in turbidity. Aquatic conditions would, however, be more favorable following construction. Specifically, overwater coverage would be reduced by approximately 9,914 square feet. The existing overwater coverage is approximately 16,345 square feet. Following construction, the overwater coverage would be reduced to approximately 6,432 square feet. A reduction in the overwater coverage would reduce the shading impacts, potentially reducing the habitat for predators of anadromous fish. In March of this year, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) announced the listing of the Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Other species of salmonids may be listed in the near future, including coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). In addition, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) also manages bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus), which have been previously listed under the ESA. Since these species are known to occur or have habitat in the vicinity of the project, a Biological Assessment (BA) was prepared, in order to document probable impacts to the listed species. The BA recognizes that the project site is located at the shore of Lake Washington, and within an area of influence for the Cedar River. Listed species, and those that could be listed per the ESA prior to the completion of construction have been evaluated. The BA will siterc City ofRenton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir qtal Review Committee Staff Report RENT)N SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION L UA-99-048,SA A,ECF REPO]T AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 5,1999 Page4 of 9 be used by NMFS to evaluate the potential effect of the project on the affected listed species. Formal conferencing (per Section 7 of the ESA) with NMFS is being initiated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) separate from City and State permitting authority. The BA provides an analysis of effects on Chinook salmon, Coho, salmon, Bull trout, Bald eagles, and Peregrine falcons. These species are either listed, or are anticipated to be listed, prior to completion of the project. The BA notes that construction disturbance would be temporary and would include noise and localized increases in water turbidity. Pile driving activities associated with the project would last approximately one to three days. Furthermore, the BA recognizes that the area of shading would decrease as a result of the net decrease in the overwater coverage. Conclusions of the Biological Assessment note that the project would have an overall positive effect on shoreline habitats that may be utilized by the chinook and coho salmon, and bull trout. This is because of the net decrease in overwater coverage, the increase in bank stability, the reduced grounding of seaplane floats, and the removal of potentially contaminated sediments. No further mitigation is recommended. Mitigation Measures: None recommended. Policy Nexus: Not applicable. 3) Emergency Services — Fire Protection Impacts: The proposal would demolish existing deteriorated seaplane ramps and docks, replacing them with new facilities. The rehabilitation of the seaplane base is a proposed action that allows the Fire Prevention Bureau to require mitigation that would upgrade emergency access to the seaplane base and docks. Mitigation: The applicant shall be responsible for installing a minimum 20-foot wide vehicle access gate in the fence at the northeast corner of the restaurant parking lot. The exact location is to be determined through coordination of the Fire Marshall and the Renton Airport Manager. The area directly in front of the gate is to be marked as "Fire Lane — No Parking". The gate must be installed and approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of the occupancy permit. Nexus: Environmental (SEPA) Ordinance B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF X DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE— MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. X Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and A.seal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with a Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir ntal Review Committee Staff Report RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION L UA-99-048,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 5,1999 Page5 of 9 C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall be responsible for installing a minimum 20-foot wide vehicle access gate in the fence at the northeast corner of the restaurant parking lot. The exact location is to be determined through coordination of the Fire Marshall and the Renton Airport Manager. The area directly in front of the gate is to be marked as "Fire Lane — No Parking". The gate must be installed and approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of the occupancy permit. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Pla i Review— Street Improvements, Water, Surface Water, Sanitary Sewer 1. The project only has access to Lake Washington and Renton Municipal Airport property and would not require any street improvements or traffic mitigation fees. 2. No water system improvements are proposed by the project. If any additional water main/fire hydrants are required, they must meet current fire flow/fire Codes per the City of Renton Fire Department. 3. The project proposes repair of existing storm drainage flap-gate and construction of a new access pier to the above drainage system flap-gate. No surface water System Development Connection fees are required for this project. 4. No connection to or any work is being proposed by the project to the sanitary sewer system. The project is located in the vicinity of the Metro Bryn Mawr trunk sewer main and King County Metro should be contacted as to its location. No wastewater System Development Connection fees are required for this project. Firc Prevention 1. Installation of a 20-wide vehicle access gate must be provided in the fence at the northeast portion of the restaurant parking lot. The gate may be installed so as to leave the seaplane vehicle parking area undisturbed. 2. The area directly in front of the gate must be marked as "FIRE LANE — NO PARKING". 3. Existing fire hydrant needs to be raised up by the Water Department. 4. Existing fire hydrants made need to be retrofitted with quick couple Storz fittings. Pla ining 1. Applicant shall comply with all local, state, regional and federal permitting agencies. 2. Applicant shall consider the use of bio-engineered bank in lieu of the rip-rap proposed. The applicant should coordinate with the Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine whether a bio-engineered slope is appropriate for this proposal. King County/Metro 1. King Country Metro has provided a separate comment letter regarding their plans to construct a new parallel of the King County Byrn Mawr Trunk. A copy of the comment letter is attached. The applicant is advised to contact Metro staff as listed in the letter. siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir ntal Review Committee Staff Report RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION L UA-99-048,SA-A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 5,1999 Page6 of 9 PAR f THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Demolition Plan (Received March 26, 1999). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. C2r, Neighborhood Detail Map (Received March 26, 1999). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. C4r, Proposed Site Plan (Received March 26, 1999). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 1 of 2, Sections (Received March 26, 1999). Exhibit No. 6. Drawing No. 2 of 2, Sections (Received March 26, 1999) Exhibit No. 7: Biological Assessment by Pentec Environmental (August 5, 1999). C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. 1.GENERAL CRITERIA: a.Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; Policies of the Employment Area — Industrial land use designation state that the primary uses in the EAI should be industrial (Policy LU-195). The Will Rogers-Wiley Post Seaplane Base is a component of the Renton Municipal Airport and is located along the northern siterc City oj'Renton P/B/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir ntal Review Committee Staff Report RENT)N SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION L UA-99-048,SA-A,ECF REPOF T AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 5,1999 Pagel of 9 edge of the airport property, along the shore on Lake Washington. The Renton Municipal Airport abuts the Boeing Renton manufacturing plant, and airplanes manufactured by the Boeing Company at this location leave from the airport for delivery to clients. The airport function is integral with the abutting industrial function. b.Conformance with existing land use regulations; The proposed project is a rehabilitation of the existing seaplane base. Seaplane operations comply with existing land use regulations of the City of Renton. No intensification of use or operation would result from the rehabilitation of the seaplane base. c.Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposal would result in short-term construction impacts to the surrounding area, including an increase in noise from proposed pile driving activity. Existing codes and regulations of the City and State restrict the hours of construction activity, including pile driving. Work is limited to the hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays is restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 p.m.. No work is permitted on Sundays. The applicant proposes to limit construction hours to between the hours of 7:30 am and 6:00 p.m., with no work to occur during weekday holidays. Once completed, there would not be disruption of operation of the airport facility, nor would there be any additional adverse impacts to the surrounding properties or uses. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Proposed work would occur primarily over water with limited upland work occurring immediately adjacent to the shorelines. Demolition of existing structures, dredging operations, pile driving, and the construction of new facilities would interrupt normal operation of the seaplane base during construction. Following construction the seaplane base would operate at pre-construction levels. e.Conservation of area-wide property values; No change to area-wide property values would result from the proposal. f.Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; Seaplanes operations would be more efficient following construction, as deteriorated facilities are removed and replaced with docking platforms and facilities. e.Provision of adequate light and air; There would be no change to upland conditions. However, inwater conditions would improve for aquatic habitat as the project would result in the removal of approximately 9,914 square feet of water coverage. The amount of inwater area shaded would decrease, and the area available for salmonid predators would be decreased as a result of the proposal. f.Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The proposal would result in short-term temporary construction impacts including pile driving. The applicant has estimated that construction activity would last approximately five months, and that pile driving would last from one to three days. Existing codes and regulations of the City and State restrict the hours of construction activity, including pile driving. Work is limited to the hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays is restricted to the hours between 9:00 am and 8:00 p.m.. No work is permitted on Sundays. The applicant proposes to limit construction hours to between the hours of 7:30 am and 6:00 p.m., with no work to occur during weekday holidays. siterc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envir ntal Review Committee Staff Report RENTI)N SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION L UA-99-048,SA-A,ECF REPO T AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 5,1999 Page8 of 9 g. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; There are sufficient public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed rehabilitation of the seaplane base. h. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The character of the seaplane base would remain unchanged following construction. Deteriorated facilities on the site would be replaced, resulting in an improvement to the seaplane base and its operations. D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation project, File No. 99-048, SA-A, SM, ECF. 2) Environmental Review; The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance — Mitigated (DNS-M) on October 5, 1999. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 through 6. 4) Comprehensive Plan:The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area — Industrial (EAI). 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Public (P-1) Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Lake Washington; East: Renton Municipal Airport and Boeing Manufacturing Plant, Lake Washington; South: Renton Municipal Airport, and West: Renton Municipal Airport, Lake Washington E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area — Industrial; and the Zoning designation of Public (P-1). siterc City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&Envit ntal Review Committee Staff Report RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION L UA-99-048,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF OCTOBER 5,1999 Page9 of 9 F. Decision The Site Plan for Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation, File No. LUA-99-048, is approved. EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: C 140Vievlierciltlitke) /4KIEStill teigielq Jana Hanson,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 11th day of October, 1999 to the applicant and owner: City of Renton attn: Gail Reed, Airport Manager 616 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 Lyn Keenan Reid Middleton 728 134th Street SW Everett, WA 98204 TRANSMITTED this 11th day of October 1999 to the parties of record: None TRANSMITTED this 11th day of October 1999 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official C.Duffy, Fire Prevention Neil Watts, Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 25, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. siterc c A4fFo King County 4y Tti. Wastewater Treatment Division CNA 19DepartmentofNaturalResources9` April 30, 1999 9 821 Second Avenue 1Seattle,WA 98104-1598 f Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation (LUA-99-048, SA-A, SM, ECF) Dear Ms. Henning: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation, dated April 19, 1999. A new parallel of King County's Bryn Mawr Trunk is under construction through the proposed construction site (please see the attached figure). In order to protect this facility, please do the following: Submit construction drawings for the project to the King County Wastewater Treatment Division, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Please contact Eric Davison at 206) 684-1707. Provide evidence of liability insurance and enter into a save-harmless agreement with King County. Please contact Faith Roland, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Office of Open Space Section/Right-of-Way at (206) 296-7804. Contact Eric Davison, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, at (206) 684-1707 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commencing construction in order to allow staff time to arrange for a King County inspector to be on the site dulirtg construction. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. If you have questions, I can be reached at (206) 684-1227. Sincerely, 6(1-40)(.44a Barbara Questad Environmental Planner Enclosure CLEAN WATER —A SOUND INVESTMENT I 1; vl, c.,-.. 11-1 --I 1 . H 1 L-7,.ut.,, fix •,,,,,•,,,.,,,,,,,. ...__ _ 42. ..,.. ., __. __ ___ _ _ _.. _ ___ ___ __ LI 'si fi4th ist-- t- - L ... — =--•• 0 L. i ri-7---7--.TI p-7-----i--.-F--} 1---F\1..... 1.4..i : .. 1-1.- 1 7 — — —1••••.--.Z Li.... • i S j 11 5th St. 1 II I i: \ r"— _ , if''' -. i t ., ti •-.- -\ •,. 1 bOUBLE HOSELLJ \1 V.. \ % BIBB AT HEAD FtITAP2V. \ V. EXISTING RAM F C I I._ ! I.i 7:7111 - 7-7-.1 0 1 \••••i_j LILL;S _I 1.1 6th! StTILT: . --- —,-.7-- 1 ' P-r i 1 : , i ..i ....‘%. --‘ V.- -r I I ' i • ._ t 1-7-7------1-7-= - 4.- .-.L It.-t t t i i 1..,.. j I I -ft. 1 1 .4b 2" WATER V.. \ i 7. 1 l_i_L_ S i I I I 7th' St liz_-I I----:ri-.7--. 1 I--'-- ------1- •1 L.._.J—I LI i 1\-- 1 i to SERVICE kt k ,z 7...)I 1-. r 1 FT-7-7T-71 r-r-1- . r.•‘-,5! 1.I,j L-. H. 1 I , 1.1 ! i .179 • I i i L 1.- , il a , '?...3.1 Li____I La,.j i 1r7f11,2LIEJ: -;-7-. ' -'. r 1 i 1 ni 1 1.... a42...Cl) t--, ! . I 71 1j ! : __` I ' 1-1 F-1--TT- ..,1 1 ta V la ',1 0• 1 r ._____.7.11 r. .7 _ _71,...._______.• i__ 177_ 1!• 1 L S ' ' 18 Lb ''St... 1::-1 t. 41 L.. 1 • 13$3 It \--§, 13 r- 1-.:,.„,- i...., .-I 1_1_, .....; _.... 1.....11 •--i 1— 11 LLL S ill9ttl ' St' i .— 0 V ‘ Vs V ‘ • , (., t.9, _ ._A 5 . ,„,i.._ 1....„....: i 1 r, : i ' i irli--1 -.. .L__ 1 1 : i S 1 [120 Eh -St l'-".1 - 1 i v. A t.)-- 1.----.-- --.— -----:...-- iiL 1.: A17....•=••••am.......••• \ I 0 7 $ I [1.,21if I t.,.[:- ---. .7.-:!---'. 112IstS 1;37 at. 9.5 \ ci„ic: _ ... nn.._. 1 .......i ; .! • c..(1 1 - I.'137:.7, 17. 78-77.... 1-1 13.12 i 1 I 123Fd.'t pi- -- 1.--i rii IN' . " 9:' li 6 I i i -'—' FIDET 6j?Lfth 1 17— T.-t i...c.," ------f2-r-------7--,----ilks-,4 ;,....‘11 i 6 th ,•S --..- t 74 192 1134 16' t 1 1 .t . 1 I! 4 13311 i I.....,_...........:-.1 i , .IPRV ii. 1 • i 0..tu--...;,---!.. •r —•-••••——-1 S ! I25th St. LI --- i 4' I , '. ,.,.„ 4„. \ 1.. i \___. I,.i 1 v. .....1..N,.........._.\v..............., .1 i..II. -1.7 .A. ...4. _...J N*...,.5 i,, . t \1 ....\\...--,.:•.:...,\....,.:-,...4..., . i .:.- ! ',.,,,ce.,1 ; ,,,,,.___,..„ r....-- um A ‘ \ 1 al .- ••••,, •„•_.•••,........„,., ... r._ . ,,\.,,.„.,.. i, ., , ... ,__.., i 343 j I IVO alii t eeANN:1153) > I 1-• „ • :1.31.' OW \ 1. . ! M:, i ‘ •'E.I I ' ,_... .... 141 C... . ii . ---I - •-•'------&,,. ...; _ .q...,,..., _. _ : \ , • I i r - f''' s' inis 1;--• -. -::"- \ m W! , 1)\ R ..1 .- __,..-- . isst -I 11jNW'ri ,zi Ln • 1.?.. ; 0,ise' 3 ,• 6_2 .. 411;_r 1 — Iiill:-,4.4271.),'A:sm.' ,Dif • 1 ur,,,,-,ii 1 96i-- 1--- •1 b32 I>I IA ..1,...-- .._-__ 1 I. I,„......1r). ,,, , rt j 1_ 5318 E I :5318 W 1/2 0 4 01N- 01) UTILITIES DIVISIONLITIESDIVISION 71/PVI TECHNICAL SERVICESP7 v TzcHNICAL SERVICES 1: ir IREMOVE OLD DECK & BULKHEAD 25.0'— „ PROPOSED SHEET PILES 23.0'— H PROPOSED FLOAT 16' FREES ARD (TYP) H Y HIGH LAKE LEVEL 21.0'— H lNl l Y LOW LAKE LEVEL 19.0'— U ri I1 EXIST. GROUND 17.0'— 3 i p4...11.1,,. \ 15.0'— 13.0'— I I I I ROPOSED PILE PROPOSED DREDGE SLOPE II 12..) O SECTION SCALE: HORI.: 1.'5' VERT.: 1-5' IREMOVE OLD DECK & BULKHEAD 25.0'— ij = _ 1 TRANSfT10N RAMP 23.0'— H GRATED SURFACE 16- FREES ARD (TYP) H pp HIGH LAKE LEVEL 21.0'— u N p LOW LAKE LEVEL te- 190'— H ri I 1 EXIST. GROUND 17 0'— I 3 G\i`i i./ 15 0'— j v PROPOSED FLOAT 13.0'— I 4\ PROPOSED SHEET I PILE BULKHEAD I I PROPOSED DREDGE SLOPE I I EXIST. WOOD BULKHEAD LJ W/CONC. CAP PROPOSED PILE O SECTION SCALE: HORI.: 1'-5' VERT.: 1•-5' NOTE: THIS DRAWING SHOWN AT HALF SCALE. RENTON SEAPLANE BASE DES. SCALEAS NOTED SHEET NO. DR. GPM F.B. 17281341hStreetSW•Suite FA Reid i ci d I eto n Everett, Washington 98204 CH. DATE 2/1>/99 Ph: 425 741-3800 FILE NO. I:\24\98\030\4830-006.DWG OF 2 SHEETS CLASS C ROCKS Oiy\\i\\\\'\\\i1?`:':.;z. 2 CLASS B ROCKS 25.0' i':7 1 •fit-=:e• HW=22' v...1= :Y .«..y 17.0'—Sw v 2.'w,•w?..ew ttiititi.._:.::Y FILTER FABRIC I I t 2 \\/*%*V 1 QUARRY SPALLS CO SECTION SCA 1'=5LE: HORI.: VERT.: 1'=5' NOTE: THIS DRAWING SHOWN AT HALF SCALE. RENTON SEAPLANE BASE DES. SCALE AS NOTED SHEET NO. oR. GPM FB 2128thStreetSW•S204urge 200 Reid i d d I eto n Everett134Wasflington 98 DATE2/t 1/99 Ph: 425 741-3800 FILE NO. I.\'l4Aoa\n1n\gR1(1_!'nc nwr 1F 7 cHrFTS I Ns\ ..._ _ _ _ - -- - ....._ ...... I sz',/,:::..,,__ _ __ _ __ ___ _ ..... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ......_ ..,I 7//1;., e-'":----.--,--- 9 i 1 1 I 1 I ; 'Y.;•/::::::/7.?) --. ._. _ ... . ..... I r S 1 3 th 1 St, _..„._ ,,,,,o 1.•,'//.. \\.... --- 1/ 1 , I,. ! Si i 14--t , S- 6-- - -1 1-17-7- T1 I 1 7I---. n ) _.....i. _ )7.... ' s . .. 1‘ --- -_,_-__-_,-- -- I.4.,. ...., , I. ,., I ..., 15th "St. !0 1--1....-_, 1---M 1: i-. L_L 1___.' • li ii ' ! ' L .1.:.—. .., \ \ I,' s.___, th: pLi_11, LI7.. ......... 1 iii\ \ DOUBLE 11-0-SE I \ ; BIBB AT HEAD ;•F 1 1 EXISTING RAM C r---77-7-7--- r•-•--- r... f 1.. -..1 i-: I I 1 i 711- - r- 71 77\ \. "- -II TAP 1 96_1 tLi ' !Ls - iTs.thystji-i- . 1-1r 1---7 L I 7-11 _..1 1 j .., _.._i I- - C 177--_-_-1 r---1-7---r •131 .---.- ••-•-•1 I i FL.T1 •---' I I I‘• 1 .4 2" WATER \''I 1 Li_j__;____'Sr,!O 117th St.Ell 1 17'17-171" I1.___ --1, ; i ,A-- 1 , lo SERVICEI— 71 -77- -7-7-1 i---11I.1_1 L...., ' .I. I , • ...1, I 1 1-1 f--71 i i i 0.,m11L. i ! si 11.7th, Pr.c-A ciL-7.'-!.. r I I 1 k 156 M I..,.. I1.-- -II—= ill • 1\ 1.i J... 1111I ' i i 181liS L-- i 2, 13 LII vd MS 1 Ar--------. • 1 ss \ ---iD. LI" 1-S..1 11 Olti—St'1 1iD 71 J! • '-__:______! ..___...... ....Z PI A . - .. v D r-7--r-7.1 FT-7-71,-_-_i S I iildtl'I !-- - — St.11_11 A \ \\r...... r___7 .;. 1 1.7., 1.I !S I Ll'Zi§t.I StiL- ------1 -,.-,.. S. . 121st A \ 11 1 A •x,• ..---7--f I— — i LE61 ,.....::Niii 7th St ) . • 1 A1: 13.123:rd ' St. Frre_.— 1-•c. I .__[-...„. . 8". ..'', _1.7 `• It Lt:113 IIEn! 1 ...., ! — .. - ' `'').•:).6 7' t , 13" it,- ..- 1.. pi"' ........ .,._, .r..,91 ._1. ! .: 1 .e.16- 1 1A, m_...______.,1- •, - - 1 CD • i tIN \ ‘.. %i4 I 1 i ' i - C!?3 r DET.#6 4 0 ' ..-,.r4 7124tfi- I St7 14:7- 7.- 14'..,-. P„; au 1 111. m3- 1/72-1----...---••••-•*" ?""- 1 411,.. ..2 i\A\t„i 1 6th .S1:-...\ ci-3- 11.13 l•1 •TpRV il • --, — . -• ' . it I. 1.kl.i7Si1:25th St,. 1011'.‹' 4., I \ \131441. ‘, 1: ! V iLi. .......E.'-\ .....-i". 1 V. ' . U-,..--- , , 6,.,..1-‘• \ --- 1'''r".• \,........1':.::::-\\•....1\-;Li...-6' I 177. .--91 ., . •NIW .5th \St Xi ,I ,-.•\ \ ',....-\\••• • ".1. -1 i ...- I . 2..7. ax• ,11.:t--- L, 11*;4 It 7 my 1061 1..xzei.\ WU 1 i 1- ,:,.....\...Ala 'CO: II 3,‘ t••••••,... 0t-r•• jj -. ; to--1 ) ', ..E--. I a; \,•- /- ,. •. i t 1 t cv i1-- .(1) \• .14E.T.I'co•-•_ I\ . L--: - i . 2" 1DR # 1,......— • . t"' k 611. 8. 1 1303!„,_ : 6 13 1/NW /I th , Ir... -- . , ,—1 P-^ 1 96tar- cl, 1 .-., to :-t . ,a- , WI n il y, r- 1 . - ---- 1 J. i.- 5318 A '45318W1/2 0 4 ".• ' ' UTILITIES DIVISIONLITIESDIVISION i ,, paipw TSCILN1CAL SIMMS!,V TECHNICAL SERVICES 1:' .41111f" 0211S/97V7 Renton Seaplane Base r _=-- Rehabilitation:l3. 3.,x_„_x_,_ _ 0.? O bO C3% i Neighborhood Detail MapBrynMawrSerDistrict(Utility) Project Area at Will Rogers- Wiley_ W e Post Me x_n_n u , x_u_n_x_x_u_u_u_x_u_u_.r\11 y Memorial n ° a8 s 1 nnil) i l Seaplane Base d• M MDDO Q\\\\\\\\ s\/ bldgs,roads,docks an pavementdem 7. 00 00 approximate property linesM\ m I I , t„ Renton city limit line 72 0 L project area rill" The Lal:esh reEll Ode17a) 0 IAlikV\\\\firDrac [1] E-==:J oI wn By: Ketil Freeman 0 cvi 0 3/5/99 I_ 1---TI1_ g 11 S)1\s Reid iddletonRentonMunicipalAirport 0 I-T g t. 1 J ruNO V A AREA TO BE DEMOLISHED BULKHEAD TO BE DEMOLSHED 1 i-••—••-CITY URNS PROPERTY BOUNDARY s ESMT/!S LAKE WASHINGTON . D=K''07_NowN__ 3 a 1 3 EXISTING FLOATINGINc DOCK oocK To REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING DOCK REMOVE OOSENG RAMP BUCK RNER STORY DRAM OIRTML ANO FLAP GATE v we 11 APPROXWTE LAMA 7 K Of WOOD BEACHING I maPLATFORM.TO BC Z D \ i DESTROYED t. 0 e z IXISTINC BUILDING TOTAL OVER-WATER p COVERAGE TO BE REMOVED .. 12,500 S.F. to p C o W O 15 4gc'.S_. E c 1 1 C23 r Y_4C« I j - I r.AS SHOWN 10 0 b ' f I \ 1 I 11 / w B CLFR e'1 NOTE: _ l- I If V DOES NOT MEASURE 1' ".JAN.1999 ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. t\T.\vs3OJO3M42-xvo0 +24-98-030 iLEWD PROPERTY BOUNDARY cTrY uurts I. 1 1 WIDi ESMT 135 I 1 H NOi KNOWN 1 PHASE A:EXIGTINc\ I ExrENo I I FLOATING DOCK I\2 1 I 1 1 1 11 Z\ I 12i^ I I EXISTING FLOATINGP\ PT.ry DOCK TO REANN f1[11[irij I AR LAKE WASHINGTON ip\ jj' v U ieW le APPROXIWTE lAR a 1,,• REYOVE CII NNAG CONC. PROPOSED OREDGMG FLOAT SECTION AND REPLACE WITH DEBRIS OPENING WITH GRATING i DEBRIS OPENNG• PROPOSED ROAONG DOCK \G WIN GRATED SIIREACE EEE I ` I Ij1 st'it ACCESS RAMP • 1 Ix' Ijiil ri'I'-" awl ice CITY LIMIT LINE--...............\ 4 REPAIR(01ST.STORY DRAIN I FLAP GATE.INSTALL NEW ACCESS RAMP EXTEND BULKHEAD TO FLAP ACCESS P'DECKING CATE W G11 WATER n AT BULKHEAD NEW ROCK mQSLOPEPROTECTION-LL EXISTING BUILDINGD CONCRETEREPAIRExISTI ACCESS RAMP w p TOTAL NEW AREA OF N NCOVERAGE — 5.200 S.F. pzd. g 2 1 a c 1 K 1 s 1 SCALE y 4 1 x . Je w 1` As sNOKTR NOTE: l— IF V DOES NOT uFAGVRE 1' • a • ... ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. y iFB.1999 2•\••\>KI\••J0-8..PAC E 24-98-000 CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING Oil the day of lo y' 1999, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing P Ae colvi lk at C1/1 documents. This information was sent to: NE me Representing Dc partment of Ecology Drn Hurter WSDOT K(;Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries D:vid F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources St irley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Di wamish Indian Tribe Ft( d Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Jce Jainga Puget Sound Energy ignature of Sender) SATE OF WASHINGTON SS C JUNTY OF KING I ;ertify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatAry 54r — e `err_ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: I ;I) . riCA i iy / Notary Publi n and for the State of ashington MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC Notary (PrintMARILYN KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON My appoint mlal<lftA WAENT EXPIRE COMMISSION EXPIRES JlNE , 2003 s _:fin ,.,._ . Project—Name: Y Q 1' 6-r\ P-oject Number: LJA 99 0`4-8 , SA, ELT- , NC TARY.DOC 3 CITY RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 6, 1999 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on October 5, 1999: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. The project would be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The project requires environmental review, a shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. Federal permitting is also required, which triggers the need for preparation of a Biological Assessment since the project is located in fish-bearing waters. Location: 616 West Perimeter Road. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 25, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7286. For the Environmental s 517(.11,-1 eview Committee, DA0) To ning Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget Sound Energy agencyltr\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 J , c, CITY VF RENTON sell. K Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator October 7, 1999 Mr. Lyn Keenan Reid Middleton, Inc. 728- 134th Street SW, Suite 200 Everett, WA 98204 SUBJECT: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Project No. LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF Dear Mr. Keenan: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to advise you that they have completed their review of the subject project. The ERC, on October 5, 1999, issued a threshold Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation Measures. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 25, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit(SM)will be issued following completion of the ERC appeal period. The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-7286. For the Environmental Review Committee, 12 t‘, fj/N4e111INC-) Jennifer Toth Henning Project Manager cc: City of Renton Airport/Owners Enclosure dnsmltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton Gail Reed,Airport Manager PROJECT NAME: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. The project would be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The project requires environmental review, a shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. Federal permitting is also required, which triggers the need for preparation of a Biological Assessment since the project is located in fish-bearing waters. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 616 West Perimeter Road Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Street Improvements, Water, Surface Water, Sanitary Sewer 1. The project only has access to Lake Washington and Renton Municipal Airport property and would not require any street improvements or traffic mitigation fees. 2. No water system improvements are proposed by the project. If any additional water main/fire hydrants are required, they must meet current fire flow/fire Codes per the City of Renton Fire Department. 3. The project proposes repair of existing storm drainage flap-gate and construction of a new access pier to the above drainage system flap-gate. No surface water System Development Connection fees are required for this project. 4. No connection to or any work is being proposed by the project to the sanitary sewer system. The project is located in the vicinity of the Metro Bryn Mawr trunk sewer main and King County Metro should be contacted as to its location. No wastewater System Development Connection fees are required for this project. King County 1fr ' 1,Wastewater Treatment Division 47DepartmentofNaturalResourcesC1 ••99821SecondAvenueApril30, 1999 7 Seattle,WA 98104-1598 O Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation (LUA-99-048, SA-A, SM, ECF) Dear Ms. Henning: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation, dated April 19, 1999. A new parallel of King County's Bryn Mawr Trunk is under construction through the proposed construction site (please see the attached figure). In order to protect this facility, please do the following: Submit construction drawings for the project to the King County Wastewater Treatment Division, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Please contact Eric Davison at 206) 684-1707. Provide evidence of liability insurance and enter into a save-harmless agreement with King County. Please contact Faith Roland, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Office of Open Space Section/Right-of-Way at (206) 296-7804. Contact Eric Davison, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, at (206) 684-1707 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commencing construction in order to allow staff time to arrange for a King County inspector to be on the site during construction. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. If you have questions, I can be reached at (206) 684-1227. Sincerely, L7) S7,:r766)40..V Barbara Questad Environmental Planner Enclosure r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 The Environmental Review Committee( ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the fol- a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal lowing project under the authority of the newspaper ofgeneralpublication and is now and has been for more than six months RentonENT Municipal A Pe.RENTON SEAPLANE BASE prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language REHABILITATION LA,SM,ECF continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County City of Renton proposes toCityofRentonproposesto rehabilitate por- Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the tions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post State of Washington for King County.Memorial seaplane base. Location: 616 The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County West Perimeter Road. Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers Appeals of either the environmental deter- mination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197- during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a 11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation October 25, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together as published on: 10/11/99 with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA The full amount of the fee cha ed for said foregoing publication is the sum of$48.88, 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are gov- char ed to Acct. No. 8051067 erned by City of Renton Municipal CodegSection4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk'sLegalNumber6697 Office,(425)-430-6510. Publication Date:October 11,1999 Published in the South County JournalLegalClerk, South ountyg Journal October11,1999.6697 Subscribed and sworn before me on this...)___'A day of- A k-e, , 199 rtl'Ci.\TZA9 T`,...,".... 1-.)---.\:--q9-lt 04-I\-.0. t. Notary Public of the State of Washington V •V residing in Renton o-- ' y= King County, Washington Ii••'C 2 B ..2O-G "+ V Oiii R WASN-,p'' Isiln Ittttt• NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. Project requires environmental review, shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. Location: 616 West Perimeter Road. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 25, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required 75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, 425)-430-6510. Publication Date:October 11, 1999 ccount No. 51067 di ispub CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton Gail Reed,Airport Manager PROJECT NAME: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers- Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. The project would be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The project requires environmental review, a shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. Federal permitting is also required, which triggers the need for preparation of a Biological Assessment since the project is located in fish-bearing waters. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 616 West Perimeter Road LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 25, 1999. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: October 11, 1999 DATE OF DECISION:October 5, 1999 SIGNATURES: Gr Zlim ‘maAiditistIk(em-*/1°\Pfs/qfDAEDepartmentPlanning/Building/Public Works 7 / Jim tGl Shepher , Ad inistrator DATE Community Services fr;53. Lee W e er, Fire Chief DATE Renton Fire Department dnsmsig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton Gail Reed, Airport Manager PROJECT NAME: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. The project would be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The project requires environmental review, a shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. Federal permitting is also required, which triggers the need for preparation of a Biological Assessment since the project is located in fish-bearing waters. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 616 West Perimeter Road MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for installing a minimum 20-foot wide vehicle access gate in the fence at the northeast corner of the restaurant parking lot. The exact location is to be determined through coordination of the Fire Marshall and the Renton Airport Manager. The area directly in front of the gate is to be marked as"Fire Lane—No Parking". The gate must be installed and approved by the Fire Department prior to issuance of the occupancy permit. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton Gail Reed,Airport Manager PROJECT NAME: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. The project would be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gate. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The project requires environmental review, a shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. Federal permitting is also required, which triggers the need for preparation of a Biological Assessment since the project is located in fish-bearing waters. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 616 West Perimeter Road Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Plan Review—Street Improvements,Water, Surface Water, Sanitary Sewer 1. The project only has access to Lake Washington and Renton Municipal Airport property and would not require any street improvements or traffic mitigation fees. 2. No water system improvements are proposed by the project. If any additional water main/fire hydrants are required, they must meet current fire flow/fire Codes per the City of Renton Fire Department. 3. The project proposes repair of existing storm drainage flap-gate and construction of a new access pier to the above drainage system flap-gate. No surface water System Development Connection fees are required for this project. 4. No connection to or any work is being proposed by the project to the sanitary sewer system. The project is located in the vicinity of the Metro Bryn Mawr trunk sewer main and King County Metro should be contacted as to its location. No wastewater System Development Connection fees are required for this project. Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,EC F Advisory Notes (continued) Page 2 of 2 Fire Prevention 1. Installation of a 20-wide vehicle access gate must be provided in the fence at the northeast portion of the restaurant parking lot. The gate may be installed so as to leave the seaplane vehicle parking area undisturbed. 2. The area directly in front of the gate must be marked as"FIRE LANE—NO PARKING". 3. Existing fire hydrant needs to be raised up by the Water Department. 4. Existing fire hydrants made need to be retrofitted with quick couple Storz fittings. Planning 1. Applicant shall comply with all local, state, regional and federal permitting agencies. 2. Applicant shall consider the use of bio-engineered bank in lieu of the rip-rap proposed. The applicant should coordinate with the Department of Fish and Wildlife to determine whether a bio-engineered slope is appropriate for this proposal. King County/Metro 1. King Country Metro has provided a separate comment letter regarding their plans to construct a new parallel of the King County Byrn Mawr Trunk. A copy of the comment letter is attached. The applicant is advised to contact Metro staff as listed in the letter. ifir oti. King County 4y a 4WastewaterTreatmentDivisionw 999DepartmentofNaturalResources 821 Second Avenue April 30, 1999 ee)Seattle,WA 98104-1598 Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation (LUA-99-048, SA-A, SM, ECF) Dear Ms. Henning: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation, dated April 19, 1999. A new parallel of King County's Bryn Mawr Trunk is under construction through the proposed construction site (please see the attached figure). In order to protect this facility, please do the following: Submit construction drawings for the project to the King County Wastewater Treatment Division, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Please contact Eric Davison at 206) 684-1707. Provide evidence of liability insurance and enter into a save-harmless agreement with King County. Please contact Faith Roland, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Office of Open Space Section/Right-of-Way at (206) 296-7804. Contact Eric Davison, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, at (206) 684-1707 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commencing construction in order to allow staff time to arrange for a King County inspector to be on the site dining construction. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. If you have questions, I can be reached at (206) 684-1227. Sincerely, If3tutt-of4ce. Barbara Questad Environmental Planner Enclosure CLEAN WATFR - A SniJNn INVF.STMFNT I fr.-.V s. tr _ -7-77, -T--- 1 __! 1_.. :.. J 1 L.: •.-/..•;..,,.,.•/)<-- -- - . 4% v1, .,,• i 1 ,S 13th iSt ••//////,,'-' \ - i s_,,z/ s,. t ..1, ''E-7-77 i ,i • . 1 _ z i IS j1.15tht SU !I.- , 4Ji0 f_________i ! 17— '---- k 11 -- IL2 13 \ DOUBLE HOSE 13 IA I • I ! 'S Ii_5th, PI IL Li I 1' 1' 1-, \ , BIBB AT HEAD F1 V. 1 *1. EXISTING RAM r z_ - - -11- L-V".. i TAP C 1-77-771 r—n--I--r-,ir--- ,----1J.. • I. 1 1. - i_i r\ \ .— .!12_1122. _. ii6thrSt-1 il----7--z \ '-' . 96jr v.. _• • 0 1 .2: , 0 41 : am..IN...MONO C i n.7.7:71 Er.---1- 1-1, - ••• • . t,— ,LI i.:. i 0 L., ___2 1 1 i‘ 1i . • .7 , i_t_LSti 117thi _ tJ-Li I--,--Irr-,--711 ; t2" WATER i to SERVICE 11.., \ 023 I L ,-1 11-17---7 I I i y 1 1 i 1---1 t \ 4 I S 117th Pl.'--J --.1- -• 1 1 ' 4a, L _ ! •1Ir----------____L—J V .4 12• X V) i-r--1 s 1 - r---1 -7-----•7 1 I .T. • .6 r! I . I i . iy, '1 tl118alSt1--- i - 'II - L.-- __!! V li P' CD r I r"."-----. --I r- -: -"ck- c,,.. k..; \- - s z t-, 7— A 95 1 Ai- L..: I i I,MI - - 1iI ' ! S I [120th •St'r . - 1 V 1:1 v 1 \ k117- , r- 7.1 F17.77-71—_ __.-----_-_, .7_ -----A st \,LLS I 0.21.51-ISt1-.- 11 .. . .- --I It, ,S i 71:21 t LS i- -. 4 :17[11 SFr - CP i aweN1 1 11 1, i,,123rd ' St c, ............... • - . i. 1.,, 1 - „al' • I 8" : .'. _! tra, \ 1\ \ 11 12/7-61•-• --:-.-7 I-0•C/11 I '• : .--- ''... :till.iIIST- 1 1'23fd t•pi .-... 1--; To] -I' I ' ss6 • • '1 ' 4..",,-.,/ \ 4 C..° 16" un \ t 1 7-72 i ' 1 -Cii3 II .DET.#6 4 5 \ 1. ..I 1 L-4 .i...__... _ ii; •7.124th St : II , :'... ' !-•' P,,; L1 ' z; '•— 'I -g i.I.,:- Q)\ 134 l• \1 •V-,....... L i%i V L 1 1 1...“:••• 3 1 1 ;ippp .... 0 ik•A -- •••••\ • ) .1 .,1.A.,.1,---.::::--- .--..---.. ..... se.=J.--• ' S ' 125th st to V---... 1 11:' . i % '• "I' 4 \ t . i \_____ ..11.•\ .S,j; :- I . •••, •••••••11'43 \ V •:.N.....''...-V.'...\ -1 i I. -112f7 ---\ . ::, i .,y....i.H.'a I li ,:st itu..-6 1.. -"r ,,,---p --- Pill 06" ' tu, I UM i I _ 1 rx s....... A..6-N-,- ,__ _7_I-- _ ' s„ t.ns\. " 1 • 1 I-- ' I q 1 - IM3 1 i I 1237 COI ret4,..\\ ••2I3 i- >o I:-.;,, ‘,- •>i i .•7'.4; I . ali .CNI 4404 1. 1.I I - I 03.), ••,.• :.x,, f.r" 1 nass‘\ / r,‘•r--. . I _. i "--I'. ..! •,••' I 1 , i-- -1,1 -.....14L... .•,.. 1:2 ff/...,..: v :," ---; s„--., .. 1;-... -I, -:- • i i 1 1 I R ..14,„,..._... • • ru\ IS -I/NVY A th , sp , ---sss !,,, ck 6".- • _ Ins 1 , 4.435-3 L..)27.ui: i.i3if faiii ' nioti,1,__ .,,....._ , . i,........ _ _ I i, 5318 E /45318W1/2 0 4 All)UTILITIES DIVISIONITIESDIVISION Pia/PW TECHNICAL EltitVICTS TECHNICAL/CERVICES n 1:A 02/2S/97 No ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial seaplane base. The project would be accomplished in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock,installation of three access ramps,repair and extension of an existing bulkhead,stabilization of a slope with rip rap,and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over a flap gale. Dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 work would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The project requires environmental review,a shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. Federal permitting is also required, which triggers the need for preparation of a Biological Assessment since the project is located in fish- bearing waters.Location:616 West Perimeter Road. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of either the environmental determination]RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed In writing on or before 5:00 PM October 25,1999.If no appeals are filed by this date,both actions will become final.Appeals must be Med In writing together with the required 575.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Coda Section 4-8-11B.Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430-6510 Penionae..b p Paw Ire I07()r, 'l I Reid iddleton FOR FURTHER INFORMATION.PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430.7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. CERTIFICATION I, -1.CaA, Co).0.Do)21aCU , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on Cx%LYL Signed: y: ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public, in for the State of Washington residing inL,o , on the 1 a N. day of ©c I 5 MARILYN KAMCHEFF MARILYN NOTARY PUBLIC KAMCHEFF STATE OF WASHINGTON' IMTAAENT EXPIRES:g.28,Q3 COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 29r 2003 CITY OF RENTON FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM DATE: September 29, 1999 TO: Jennifer Toth Henning, Planning Director FROM:Jim Gray, Assistant Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Renton Seaplane Base 8s Dock The Fire Department is requiring that an additional mitigation item be added to this project. A twenty-foot wide vehicle access gate be provided in the fence at the Northeast corner of the existing restaurant parking lot. The Fire department could then use the existing fire hydrant to serve this area. The individual items needed to accomplish this are: 1. Installation of a twenty foot wide vehicle access gate in the fence at the northeast corner of the restaurant parking lot. 2. The area directly in front of the gate be marked as " Fire Lane No Parking ". 3. Existing fire hydrant needs to be raised by the Water Department. Completion of these items will satisfy the Fire Department concerns provided that no fueling is conducted at this site. 0 toA 414y '% 14KingCounty01Q Wastewater Treatment Division 99DepartmentofNaturalResourcesk• 9 821 Second Avenue April 30, 1999 1,Seattle,WA 98104-1598 0 Jennifer Toth Henning,Project Manager Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation (LUA-99-048, SA-A, SM,ECF) Dear Ms. Henning: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division has reviewed the Notice of Application and Proposed Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated for the Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation, dated April 19, 1999. A new parallel of King County's Bryn Mawr Trunk is under construction through the proposed construction site (please see the attached figure). In order to protect this facility, please do the following: Submit construction drawings for the project to the King County Wastewater Treatment Division, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, for review during design development so that King County staff can assess the project's impacts. Please contact Eric Davison at 206) 684-1707. Provide evidence of liability insurance and enter into a save-harmless agreement with King County. Please contact Faith Roland, King County Water and Land Resources Division, Office of Open Space Section/Right-of-Way at (206) 296-7804. Contact Eric Davison, CIP-Civil/Architectural Section, at(206)684-1707 a minimum of 72 hours prior to commencing construction in order to allow staff time to arrange for a King County inspector to be on the site during construction. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. If you have questions, I can be reached at (206) 684-1227. Sincerely, Barbara Questad Environmental Planner Enclosure CLEAN WATER —A SOUND INVESTMENT I 11(:' z .. .. ___ ___ ___ __. _ _ ...I I 1 --_______-. '•••••:.,:', ......„.., --. -- ---- .... or . .14 L. ._ ' • I 1!./..Z.:-.'','>. . ..._. ..._. -I ? ___11..*. I_ II : N •!../......., 1)!, V1‘ "A"I I IS.. 13tiiiSN ' ' '42. Ce J1 s,=2-•::1.'Ll/ - .*:. t 1%1 ------"- Li_i__:5_1_ fligh, S..Lt" - IVIIIIII./.. 0 I rr...........7...... .) Fr'...... r.'"..... ..r---1i1_:.• 4... ;1 I !. 1 1 : 1 I t•-• ri L.. 1. ._. .'..._. _. ... r......‘........ 7 .2... , ...._. : i ._ \ .......\. .. ._... . • Z 1 ' . • • 1 5 tlif St0i-4------11 :.--------- -j-:_J1-_ I --- \_. ..._... ..._ - -.._, M 117-71- Ti-77-7-ii .-1:::::: \ 1, \ \ DOUBLE HOSE 13 I — T--IS- 1 1.5flil PHI —1.-- 1 — . ".-\ \II ..-- Lit ' i I V. t k BIBB AT HEAD C EXISTING RAMP 4 TAPL. ; 1 17-71-111.17.7 1- 1 7771 \ 1 9 6j \\.,r- Lij .i_ i..__:1._s._. 1...J.61.1il_s: ct_ 1.......___._. -...ii_.__..N..#: 7., \.....-_-,.", .. ,1 -7-1--- ....._ 1 _.i , Att._ ,.... ..- . I I ‘. -1 1 2" WATER V . '• ii I L i '......§..i __117th__'-St:i Liz_-, LIA-... 1 % •63 SERVICE ai V. z r 1-7---r-----i r-r-r-r-----411..!..,..1 ,.. .', ' 1 I I • : *_.1 ! 1 II--1, •• ri---7-', ! LV.I i 11 SU i17th Pl•Lin-L' .-1.7.!..4..r • • '1 :----....._. 1 ., '773",71.n Irft 1'7: -1-1-• ----A 1 ! -.• - ....... ... Li -11 1 , 1311 1 r••-•• I • ' i ' 1 18th 'St L' I " 'II .... •.1 • LW I c9t; 13 1 -- L-------_ -.___ ___ • .-----../ ___, jr- 1 r7-7-1 • # 1 ' r--, 1 • i ._.i I__ #Iv- s Q..; il Lt '....S -41:9tlii 'SI.I 1 IIf-- - i.. A. • 11 A Z I"' rLsij. D.. i1I! r' 1_, r_---_-',:__•-_7_. 1•-__-:-_-_,..1H- 1_-__.._-,'.--_!... rs_-_•'.-_",1I1! Ir1If.1_•-_ I- 2_. E-_..- 0.._:._-_.t_ L_.- h„ir_..-1 i... 7)- S- f- t- 1r111 1.7._..1.-._- 4. 1 I ._-.—." 1.- --_ I 1' 1 1 V. v i S1 [121st1S 14A A t S.1.TI2.1tt- s- S1i1 ; : • ,' : 1 PIZAIN La.. 2nd • 1 1 . ,,. 1 ---- ! 1 1 ..1 I • 1•••.3. \ A ii,cy i ....... 1 ....1,13..1.1.uz1 '.. 1 ir li 117:Erg.- •--7.7 r•-• c/3 1 I -I i k 1 1 •1 L. ,: 1 -,1 77- I 1 1 123f0. .1 Pr..--'" '' -'....!.i ,Th___........._._.6-. • • --L-- -L•>-!-•• '' .. 4• •• 1'•.* 1 16- us, \ k., 1° •fltf-------ji3 1 6"1 i ' 1 "" I :DE:1- #6c.(:) 1 1-9.5 \ 't.7124th St i I T-:-- 7.- 1/. •!-/.' s 1 \ Ft.g 1234 1......4.,.....,•i r wr----"---"*- ----- 6 f.If ISt..-1 kl...-143 - ISIS 1,2 : 2. Vt \ ------. 7-1- T. ;__.1...,......,.., :, 4.....:.--•••• : ,4 -,.___! --::::---- —-.;---_, ...... -ibe. 1 rri,--•'-----1-1 8 ' 1.25til St._ L0 I--;;'-:--..7 "-: . i ..•13i3. ....• 1334 4; 4. Vt3r7 i \____ 46 ' , 1.: . I...A •••••••-trii• .i i ' . Tr,',-- , ,67,.:.,-- , e. -.. ••••••.. \ ‘.1 g.,..\ MI j 1 1277 ozi I I.V.ee. ..,Kt•12/4 1.--. .1 1.2-j \-• .>i I• L- 01 I 041 IN i i ---•ci)k k.....*:.,...Ais-,--, „I • i iccri ) \ ••E=.11 , , ;1.....__... ....... ,.g\;y /c_.c,-. Ito__1 i •i...... 1--- ..--..;\,.. 13-... -. -.... I • i R 12 . . 1 113 rs. 'ss E.-. - 1 4 ' 1 .:....1 • I \ IA t3NWAtli ' - , • c'., \ • E ____,____,.. .. 9:,..., . _._...,„,_•1 1,..__i_1 0 u 6 i 2" 4.1 : 144112--'-'•a)1...•..417-TT i 7°if • 1341"1•C4-2'I I .". 71 •ff•-• ----- To-11 ,•:-- ..--- I I. 1,_..... .._ 1 5318 E 111•1/1.!T6ise 5318 W 1/2 0 4 .. ' • UTILITIES DIVISIONLITIESDIVISION P/WPW TECHNICAL SERVICES4TECHNICALSERVICES P7 I.:•+. e' c- 02fl.S/91 d iddleton DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON APR 2 1999 April 19, 1999 RECEIVEDFileNo. 24-98-030-001-01 Engineer Planner Strr7'eya Jennifer Henning Development Services Division City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Renton Municipal Seaplane Base Rehabilitation File No. LUA 99-048 Dear Jennifer, Lyn Keenan will be managing the permitting work for the referenced project on behalf of Reid Middleton. Please make changes accordingly in your records about the contact person. Lyn works out of her home and can be reached by phone,fax, or e-mail as follows: Lyn Keenan 206) 937 - 6450 (phone) 206) 937 -7395 (fax) keenan@quidnunc.com If you have an immediate need for services and cannot reach Lyn,please contact me at the Reid Middleton office at(425) 741- 3800. Thank you. Sincerely, Reid Middleton, Inc. Nicole R. Faghin v1twf\renton\seaplane\permit'1yn.doc\nrf cc: Lyn Keenan Reid Middleton,Inc. Gail Reed 728 134th Street SW Suite 200 Everett,Washington 98204 Ph: 425 741-3800 Fax:425 741-3900 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIENING DEPARTMENT: pplfiL,e COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1999 APPLII ATION NO: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1999 APPLII;ANT: Gail Reed/Airport PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation WORK ORDER NO: 2.5O50 LOCATION: 616 West Perimeter Road SITE AREA: —5,200 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMM CRY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing seaplane base in two phases. Phase 1 would consit of demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair;,nd extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over flap ga e. Dreding of approx. 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Project requires environmental review, shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. A. EVV/RONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elemer t of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Enviroa ment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Sl oreline Use Utilities Animal:Transportation Environ nentai Health Public Services Energy,Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet p ' L/22161' B. P)LICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. C)DE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature,of Director or Authorized/Repr' esentative Date DEVAPP.0 DC Rev 10/9' City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIE\iIING DEPARTMENT: 1%tt.4.3 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1999 APPLIC ANT: Gail Reed/Airport PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation WORK ORDER NO: 25 050 LOCATION: 616 West Perimeter Road SITE AREA: -5,200 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMI.RY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing seaplane base in two phases. Phase ' would consit of demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair aid extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over flap gat:. Dreding of approx. 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 would extend'he floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Project requires environmental review, shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. A. EIIV/RONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elemen of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environ vent Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandiSh reline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environs rental Health Public Services Energy/Historic./Cultural Natural 2esources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 7U0 45 0 )e (6d B. PiDLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. C DDE-RELATED COMMENTS 11/4/L,C_ 6 1Z44' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area where additional information is needed properly assess this proposal. A cece-.41Z37 ,Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date9P DEVAPP.I OC Rev.101S i City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Transportation Comments Due: APIRL 28, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-048, SA-A,SM,ECF Date Circulated: April 14, 1999 Applicant: Gail Reed/Airport Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Renton Seaplane Base Work Order No: 25050 Rehabilitation Location: 616 West Perimeter Road Site Area: —5,200 sq. ft. Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments The project only has access to Lake Washington and Airport property—thus will not require any street improvements or traffic mitigation fees. a--j T" — z 9-77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Airport2 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department:Water Comments Due: APIRL 28, 1999 Application No.: LUA-99-048, SA-A,SM,ECF Date Circulated: April 14, 1999 Applicant: Gail Reed/Airport Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Renton Seaplane Base Work Order No: 25050 Rehabilitation Location: 616 West Perimeter Road Site Area: -.5,200 sq. ft. Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments No water system improvements are proposed by the project. If any additional water main/fire hydrants are required they must meet current fire flow/fire Codes per Renton Fire Department. rz-41 40,t/lAt Lf— 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Airport1 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department: Surface Water/Waste Comments Due: APIRL 28, 1999 Water Application No.: LUA-99-048, SA-A,SM,ECF Date Circulated: April 14, 1999 Applicant: Gail Reed/Airport Project Manager: Jennifer Toth Henning Project Title: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Work Order No: 25050 Location: 616 West Perimeter Road Site Area: -5,200 sq. ft. Building Area(gross): N/A A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No Comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No Comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: The project proposes repair of existing storm drainage flap-gate and construct new access pier to the above drainage system flap-gate. No surface water SDC fees are required for this project. Wastewater (Sanitary Sewer): No connection to or any work is being proposed by the project to the sanitary sewer system. The project is in the vicinity of"Metro"Bryn mawr trunk sewer main and King County Metro should be contacted as to its location. No wastewater SDC fees are required for this project. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date airport City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIE\/ING DEPARTMENT: Ftve Fv-eut1/41144 COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1999 APPLIC ANT: Gail Reed/Airport PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJE:T TITLE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation WORK ORDER NO:Q !R' LOCATION: 616 West Perimeter Road 1999 SITE AREA: -5,200 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A 1 9 SUMM/.RY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing seaplane basil In two phases. Phase ' would consit of demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair aid extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over flap gat Dreding of approx. 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 would extend 1 he floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Project requires environmental review, shoreline substantial develop inent permit and site plan approval. A. El IVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elemeni of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environ nent Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandrSh'reline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environr rental Health Public Services Energy/HistoricJCultural Natural I'esources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet A / 14,000Feet J B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 06 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have revi wed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where aoditio al information is n ed to properly assess this proposal. Signature o Director or Authorized Re esentative Date 1 DEVAPP.Do Rev 10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works EN /IRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEV/ING DEPARTMENT: t 1atn V 1t43- cJkY COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1999 ro^ah. APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1990,, r` .rf s APPLICANT: Gail Reed/Airport PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning '`7 PROJECT TITLE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation WORK ORDER NO: 25050 / LOCATION: 616 West Perimeter Road A_ SITE AF'EA: —5,200 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing seaplane base in two phases. Phase 1 would consit of demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair a id extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over flap gat . Dreding of approx. 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 would extend tie floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Project requires environmental review, shoreline substantial develop nent permit and site plan approval. A. Ef IVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environ,nent Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation LandiSh reline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environr ienta!Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural I'esources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. Ct)DE-RELATED COMMENTS Jo coiMi14ei4 11 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition info ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. ti}J 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/9a City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cohstuch SeNt COMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1999 APPLICANT: Gail Reed/Airport PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning",,.OP PROJECT TITLE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation WORK ORDER NO: 2,5 050 - t!!; OH LOCAT ON: 616 West Perimeter Road 4.k 9y SITE AREA: —5,200 sq.ft. 1 BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing seaplane base in twoitrykses. Phase • would consit of demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three acces44fiamps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over flap gate. Dreding of approx. 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 would extend he floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Project requires environmental review, shoreline substantial develop ment permit and site plan approval. A. EI IVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Elemen of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Enviror,ment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land'Sh>reline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environs-rental Health Public Services Energy/Historic./Cultural Natural,?esources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. Pt)L!CY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS lvt!t1' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where acditional information is needed to prope a . ess this proposal. 7 gnature of Directop/6r Authorized Representative Qa e DEVAPP.D)C / Rev.10/93 R City of Kenton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Etovoi u tG ile.AJd OMMENTS DUE: APRIL 28, 1999 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: APRIL 14, 1999 APPLIC ANT: Gail Reed/Airport PROJECT MANAGER: Jennifer Toth Henning PROJECT TITLE: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation WORK ORDER NO: 2-5 050 LOCAT ON: 616 West Perimeter Road SITE AREA: —5,200 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMM/RY OF PROPOSAL: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing seaplane base in two phases. Phase would consit of demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair a id extension of an existing bulkhead, stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over flap gat . Dreding of approx. 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 would extend lie floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Project requires environmental review, shoreline substantial develop Trent permit and site plan approval. A. EtIVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environ,nent Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shi reline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environn ental Health Public Services Energy/Historic/Cultural Natural resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. PC 1LICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have viewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where dditional info tion,is n--ded to properly assess this proposal. ra, Via)19y, Signature of rector or A rized -epresentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 ti CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: April 14, 1999 To: Gail Reed/Airport From: Jennifer Toth Henning/Development Planning J Subject: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Project No. LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has received the above-referenced application for environmental review. A presentation of the proposed amendment to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) is scheduled for May 4, 1999. At that meeting, staff recommendations will be made for the Committee's review and environmental determination. Following the ERC meeting, I will send you copies of the ERC determination along with the timeframes for the public comment and appeal periods for your files. ACCPTMM.DOC CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LIST OF SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS within 300 feet of the subject site PROJECT NAME: RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION APPLICATION NO: I-VA•99 • 048, A ,SPA The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Bryn Mawr Plaza L.L.0 11326 Rainier Avenue S. 118000028506 Seattle, WA 98178 Bill Colacurcio, Jr. 522 Bourbon Street 118000840009 New Orleans, LA 70130 The Lakeshore 11326 Rainier Avenue S. 118000171504 Seattle, WA 98178 State of Washington Resource Planning 0723056666 Dept of Natural P.O. Box 47014 Resources Olympia, WA 98504 DEVELOPMENTECITYOFRENTON NING MAR 26 1999 RECEIVED Attach additional sheets, if necessary) tri;;/ Y CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process t'1Vni,O Land Use/Zoning: The portion of the site that is located within the City limits is designated Employment Area-Industrial(EAI)on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, NOTICE OF APPLICATION and coned Public Use(P-1).Municipal airports are a permitted use in the P-1 Zone.The rehabilitation of the seaplane facilities Is part of the munidpal airport AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF Zoning pot.The proposal consistentaad City Comprehensive Plan andZoningpoliciesanddevelopmentstandards. NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED(DNS-M) Density: Not applicable Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None DATE: Development Regulations April 19,1999 Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's Environmental(SEPA)Ordinance,Zoning Code,King County Surface Water Drainage Manual,Public Works Standards, LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF Uniform Fire Code,Uniform Building Code,Shoreline Master Program,and other applicable construction and building standards. APPUCATION NAME: RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION Proposed Mitigation Measures: The proposal to rehabilitate the seaplane base could result in impacts to the shoreline area.The following mitigation measures will likely be PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing seaplane recommended to diminish or eliminate impacts to the environment: base in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock,installation of three access ramps,repair and extension of an existing bulkhead,stabilization of a slope with rip rap,and 1. Fish and Wildlife:The applicant shall comply with limitations placed on construction activity by the repair of a stonnflap gate and access pier over flap gate. Dredging of approx.1,800 cubic yards of accumulated Department of Fish and Wildlife. sediment beneath floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feettothenorth.Project requires environmental review,shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. PROJECT LOCATION: 818 West Perimeter Road Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.by 5:00 PM on May 3,1999. If you haveOPTIONALDETERMINATIONOFNON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contactRentonhasdeterminedthatsignificantenvironmentalimpactsareunlikelytoresultfromtheproposedproject. MI.Henning at(425)430-7288. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record andTherefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give will be notified of any decision on this project. notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated intoasinglecommentperiod.There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of CONTACT PERSON: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING (425)430-7288 Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: March 26,1999 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 19,1999 APPLICANT: City of Renton Gail Reed,Airport Manager 616 West Perimeter Road Renton,WA 98055 CONTACT: Reid Middleton,Inc.lattn:Lynn Keenan) 72$134'Street SW,Suits 200 Everett,WA 98204 S••N•••ease aoutuilinieu OWNER: City of Renton 1 Gail Reed,Airport Manager r _ _ ' _` 616 West Perimeter Road Renton,WA 98055 1..._._lam._.. .-- Per mils/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Review, t Shoreline Substantial Development Permit ri Other Permits which may be required: Hydraulic Permit Approval from State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife V Requested Studies: None Location where application may Reid iddletan be reviewed:Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: None Required GENMALOT CERTIFICATION r amen. wetih,mgI, Jelin' I 01 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property onr7/ /9, /4 q 9 TaSign- , or ram.•Q Wiett4/1/ ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary ' blic, ., an. or • • tate of Washington residing if -Ma-volt 9 on the Z` - :ay of 4c, /I'ei, 7-7") a.A...--k k"c"----)—y•-•- /(--°" (--7 MARILYN KAMCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 - o c41( NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: April 19,1999 LAND USE N UMBER: LUA-99-048,SA-A,SM,ECF APPLICATIC N NAME: RENTON SEAPLANE BASE REHABILITATION PROJECT D_SCRIPTION: The City of Renton proposes to rehabilitate portions of the existing seaplane base in two r hases. Phase 1 would consist of demolition of a seaplane platform and replacement with a floating dock, installation of three access ramps, repair and extension of an existing bulkhead,stabilization of a slope with rip rap, and repair of a stormflap gate and access pier over flap gate. Dredging of approx. 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath floating docks would also occur. Phase 2 would extend the floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. Project requires environmental review,shoreline substantial development permit and site plan approval. PROJECT LOCATION:616 West Perimeter Road OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS-M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14 day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE:March 26, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 19, 1999 APPLICANT City of Renton Gail Reed,Airport Manager I p, 616 West Perimeter Road Renton,WA 98055 CONTACT: Reid Middleton,Inc. (attn: Lynn Keenan) 728 134`"Street SW,Suite 200 Everett,WA 98204 OWNER: City of Renton Gail Reed,Airport Manager 616 West Perimeter Road Renton,WA 98055 Permits/Rev ew Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Site Plan Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Other Permits which may be required: Hydraulic Permit Approval from State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Requested Studies: None Location where application may be reviewed Planning/Building/Public Works Division, Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: None Required GENMALOT CONSISTE JCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Land Use/2 oning: The portion of the site that is located within the City limits is designated Employment Area—Industrial(EAI)on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, and zoned Public Use(P-1). Municipal airports are a permitted use in the P-1 Zone. The rehabilitation of the seaplane facilities is part of the municipal airport operations. The proposal is consistent with City Comprehensive Plan and Zoning policies and development standards. Density: Not applicable Environme ttal Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: None Developme nt Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: The proposal is subject to the City's Environmental(SEPA)Ordinance,Zoning Code,King County Surface Water Drainage Manual, Public Works Standards, Uniform Fire Code,Uniform Building Code,Shoreline Master Program, and other applicable construction and building standards. Proposed I litigation Measures: The proposal to rehabilitate the seaplane base could result in impacts to the shoreline area. The following mitigation measures will likely be recommended to diminish or eliminate impacts to the environment: 1. Fish an d Wildlife: The applicant shall comply with limitations placed on construction activity by the Departr lent of Fish and Wildlife. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Jennifer Toth Henning, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on May 3, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Ms.Henning at(425)430-7286. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT 'ERSON: JENNIFER TOTH HENNING (425)430-7286 PLEASE II1CLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION i1r_J Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation: s Neighborhood Detail Mal Mro Mew, .Mfr. Ile. 11lyl ru i LU ;" o j O l O vL9a o Reid iddleton CITY OF RENT ON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION LAND USE P RM T AST R APPLICATIO PROPERTY OWNER S PROJECT INFORMATION Note if IAheca(3 more than one legal owner,p)eese attach art addrt onal notarized Master.~Application for,:each'oiNne. PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: City of Renton Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: Attn: Gail Reed, Airport Manager Will Rogers Wiley Post Seaplane Base • 616 W. Perimeter Road 616 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): CITY: Renton, WA ZIP: 98055 072305-9007-0 TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): 425/233-2591 Public Seaplane Base at Renton Municipal Airport APPLICA.NT.(If'other.than owner} PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Same COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: Public Use ADDRESS:PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Not Applicable CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: p E OE PNG P-1 CITY OF RENTONLAhNi TELEPHONE NUMBER: MARPMNT iy99 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): f'"ED Not Applicable CONTACT PERSON SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME:fi eeiiid. Keelf\ Proposed floating docks will occupy approximately 5,200 square feet of over- water space. COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: Reid Middleton, Inc. To be determined. In the range of $500,000. ADDRESS: 728 - 134th Street SW, Suite 200 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION,AREA? No CITY:Everett, WA zIP: 98204 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER: 4Q=0 2.0(0-931 •0so This sl..te is located in the Urban dux 2AV - g31 .1$41S Shoreline Environment. ULEGAL DESCRIPTION PACIFIC NORTHWEST TITLE COMPANY ALTA COMMITMENT,SCHEDULE A,ORDER NO.323290 Legal Description for he THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF KING,STATE Renton Municipal Air loft OF WASHINGTON,AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Including the Will Rot 3rs- PORTIONS OF SECTION 7 AND 18,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,RANGE 5 EAST,W.M.,IN KING Wiley Post Memori 1 COUNTY,WASHINGTON,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Seaplane Base BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE INNER HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON AS SHOWN UPON SHEET#26 OF THE PLAT OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS SURVEY 1921,AS SAID PLAT WAS FILED WITH THE AUDITOR OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,SEPTEMBER 19,1921 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1552504 WHICH POINT BEARS NORTH 35%%D 00'WEST 92.62 FEET FROM THE ANGLE POINT IN SAID INNER HARBOR LINE DESCRIBED"86"ON SAID PLAT; 2 THENCE SOUTH 35%%D 00'00"EAST,ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE,92.62 FEET TO SAID ANGLE POINT;THENCE EAST,ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE,403.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 13%%D 53'28"EAST 924.67 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 76%%D 06'82"WEST 50.00 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 13%%D 53'28"EAST 318.15 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 14%%D 08' 28"EAST 3,239.00 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 15%%D 12'50"EAST 99.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18%%D 16'25"EAST 100.01 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 21%%D 39'45"EAST 100.45 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 24%%D 31'35"EAST 104.68 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 28%%D 13' 20"EAST 100.79 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 31%%D 11'40"EAST 100.27 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 34%%D 18'30"EAST 100.02 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 37%%D 14'05"EAST 100.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40%%D 03'10"EAST 100.33 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 42%%D 53'30"EAST 100.87 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 45%%D 39'20"EAST 101.62 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS A PRODUCTION NORTHERLY OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 23,BLOCK 4,RENTON REAL4110 ESTATE CO:S 1ST ADDITION TO RENTON;THENCE SOUTH 00%%D 31'47"WEST,ALONG SAID PRODUCED LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 23 AND 18,BLOCK 4 OF SAID PLAT,254.62 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF DIXIE AVENUE AS NOW LOCATED AND ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE EAST LINE OF LOT 18,BLOCK 4 OF SAID ADDITION; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DIXIE AVENUE,NORTH 88%%D 34'43"WEST, 1,486.84 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF LAKE STREET;THENCE NORTH 00%%D 31'47"EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 10.00 FEET;THENCE NORTH 88%%D 34'43"WEST,ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DIXIE AVENUE,225.49 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID LINE; THENCE NORTH 71%%D 29'12"WEST,ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,152.58 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY#5 AS NOW FIXED AND ESTABLISHED;THENCE NORTHERLY,ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE,FOLLOW THE TANGENT AND CURVING COURSES THEREOF TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE WHICH IS 5 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 7 AND 8,BLOCK 18 OF THE PLAT OF BRYN MAWR,KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,PRODUCED EASTERLY,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS,PAGE 58,IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;THENCE SOUTH 88%%D 27'28"EAST,ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE,89.23 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 540.00 FEET WEST,MEASURED ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, FROM THE WEST LINE OF BLACK RIVER WATERWAY AS SHOWN UPON SHEET#5 PREPARED BY UDO HESSE,COURT COMMISSIONER,AND FILED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE 156371;THENCE NORTH 05%%D 16'51"EAST,438.90 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE WHICH IS 2 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE LINE BETWEEN LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 17 OF SAID PLAT OF BRYN MAWR,PRODUCED EASTERLY,SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION BEING 520.00 FEET WEST,MEASURED ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID WATERWAY;THENCE NORTH 40%%D 09'47"EAST,188.55 FEET;THENCE NORTH 60.00 FEET;THENCE NORTH 29%%D 00'40"WEST,197.07 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE WHICH IS 300 FEET NORTH,MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES,THERETO,OF AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF BOWLING STREET(FORMERLY EMERSON AVENUE)PRODUCED EASTERLY; THENCE SOUTH 88%%D 27'28"EAST,ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE,355.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7,TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST,W.M.,IN KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON,MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON INNER HARBOR LINE OF LAKE WASHINGTON AT AN ANGLE POINT DESIGNATED 862"ON PAGE 26 OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19,1921 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 1552504,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON;THENCE NORTH 35%%D 00'00"WEST,ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE,92.62 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE NORTH 35%%D 00'00" WEST,ALONG SAID INNER HARBOR LINE,49.79 FEET TO A POINT 40.00 FEET NORTHERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO,THE NORTHERLY LINE OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO DEFENSE PLANT CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3321579, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASHINGTON;THENCE NORTH 88%%D 27'28"WEST,PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHERLY LINE,234.53 FEET,TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE INTERSECTION OF NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID DEEDED TRACT WITH WESTERLY LINE OF EXISTING INTERCEPTOR DITCH BEARS SOUTH 01%%D 32'32"WEST;THENCE SOUTH 01%%D32'32"WEST 40.00 FEET TO SAID INTERSECTION;THENCE SOUTH 88%%D 27'28"EAST,ALONG NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID DEEDED TRACT,264.17 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO BLOCKS A AND B,THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL MAP OF LAKE WASHINGTON SHORE LANDS, AS SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS AT OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON. Rei r iddleton March 5, 1999 File No. 24-98-030-001-01 Engineer Development Services Division Planner City of Renton surveyor, 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Subject: Renton Municipal Seaplane Base Rehabilitation This letter accompanies the submittal by Reid Middleton,Inc. on behalf of the City of Renton Municipal Airport of required materials for the Land Use Permit Master Application and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. Included in the body of this letter is the Project Narrative and Construction Mitigation components for both permit elements. Due to the unique nature of the proposed project, some initial clarification is warranted. The proposed project is located in the northwest corner of the Renton Municipal Airport at the Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base. Elements of the proposed project include rehabilitation only of an existing seaplane docking facility. The majority of work will occur over the waters of Lake Washington. Upland portions of the project are limited to the shoreline immediately adjacent to overwater portions of the project and are limited to improvements at the location of access ramps to proposed floating docks and stabilization of an existing slope with rip-rap. No grading is proposed as a component of this project. Please note that a geotechnical report is not included. A report will be provided as information becomes available. Reid Middleton is currently researching the availability of conclusions and information from borings for an adjacent King County/Metro project. No pilings will be designed without the benefit of a geotechnical report that includes the location of American Telephone and Telegraph fiber-optic cables located in the vicinity of the proposal site. DEVELOPMENT PLAN NI CITY OF RENTOI Project Narrative MAR 2 6 199 The following site description and proposal description constitutes the Project RECEIVE Narrative requirement for site plan approval. Required Project Narrative components including proposal site size,location,existing use, special site features, and statement of soil conditions are contained in the Site Description section. Required Project Narrative components including the scope and process of development,proposed off-site improvements, estimated construction costs Reid Middleton,In and fair market value, and estimated quantities of excavated material are 728 134th Street SO contained in the Proposal Description section. Additional environmental Suite 200 Everett,Washington 98204 Ph: 425 741-3800 Fax 425 741-3900 Development Services Division City of Renton March 5, 1999 File No. 24-98-030-001-01 Page 2 information is available in the SEPA checklist included with the Land Use Permit Master Application. Site Description The proposal site is located adjacent to and over Lake Washington in the northeast corner of the Renton Municipal Airport at 616 West Perimeter Road. All upland portions of the proposal site are located within the boundaries of the airport property and are contained within the city limits. However, some existing and overwater portions of the project will occur over City of Renton owned lands in King County. This jurisdictional crossover is noted in a pre-application memorandum from the City of Renton dated January14, 1999. For the purposes of this application,the proposal site is considered to be those overwater portions of the proposed and existing seaplane docking facilities as well as upland portions of the proposal site which are subject to improvement and directly provide access or utility service to the docks themselves. All upland and overwater portions of the proposal site are located on or over City of Renton owned property. Portions of the proposal site located within the city limits and airport boundary are zoned Public (P-1). Those overwater portions of the proposal site located in King County are prezoned Heavy Industrial(IH). No change in use or zoning is contemplated by this project. Adjacent uses and zoning include continued P-1 zoning and airport use to the south and east of the proposal site, and RM-900 Maximum Density Multiple Dwelling Restricted Service zoning and multifamily residential use to the west of the proposal site in unincorporated King County. The proposal site is located over and adjacent to Lake Washington. The current City of Renton Shoreline Master Program Designation locates the proposal site in the Urban Shoreline Environment. Beyond this designation no additional environmentally critical areas are known to be in the vicinity of the proposal site. Soil types in the upland site vicinity include sand and gravel. Because (1)the majority of the proposed project will consist of floating docks and (2) no additional impervious surface will be added as a result of the proposed project, existing drainage conditions will not be negatively impacted. Proposal Description The proposal site is currently used as a seaplane base. No change of use is contemplated by this project. The proposed project involves rehabilitation only Reid iddleton Development Services Division City of Renton March 5, 1999 File No. 24-98-030-001-01 Page 3 of overwater and some upland portions of the existing Renton Municipal Airport seaplane base. The primary component of the proposed project includes demolition of an existing deteriorated wood seaplane beaching platform and installation of a new floating dock. The existing beaching ramp is designed to provide approximately five spaces for seaplanes to moor, but due to storm damage is now unusable. The new floating dock will replace the beaching ramp and provide a seaplane tie- up area for approximately five seaplanes. The proposed project also includes installation of three access ramps to the floats; repair and extension of an existing bulkhead; stabilization of an existing slope with rip rap;repair to an existing storm drain flap gate and the access pier over the flap gate; minor dredging of accumulated sediments beneath existing floats; and installation of minor water and electrical services to provide means for pressure washing and lighting of the docks. Dredging of accumulated sediment is required to ensure that the proposed floating docks have sufficient draft to float. Removal of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of silt is required to ensure sufficient draft. A second phase of the proposed project will extend the existing floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The timing of this phase has yet to be determined. No existing upland vegetation including trees will be disturbed as a result of the proposed project. Because the proposed project involves rehabilitation of an existing facility only,no off-site improvements are proposed. Finally,no property dedications are required because the proposal site is composed entirely of City of Renton owned land. Construction Mitigation Description Construction of the proposed project will incorporate standard best management practices for overwater work including the requirement that the contractor allow no demolition debris to enter the water and the requirement that no demolition debris be stockpiled in in-water or nearshore areas. Required dredging of accumulated marine sediments will be undertaken with a barge-mounted clam shell bucket. Dredge spoils will be transported from the site by barge and will be disposed of in a state licensed upland disposal site to be determined by the contractor. Reid iddleton Development Services Division City of Renton March 5, 1999 File No. 24-98-030-001-01 Page 4 Due to the proximity of residential uses and potential impacts due to construction related noise construction activity will be limited to non-holiday weekdays between the hours of 7:30 AM and 6:00 PM. Construction is programmed to begin on June 15, 1999 and will last approximately five months. Thank you for your consideration of these facts. If you have any questions please contact Ketil Freeman or Nicole Faghin at Reid Middleton. Sincerely, Reid Middleton, Inc. Ketil Freeman,Planner bjr\wf\renton\seaplane\pennit\proj nar.doc\ktl Enclosures Reid iddleton UEV CITY OF REN OWING MAR 2 6 1999 RECEIVED s e ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST RCW 197-11-960 Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal if it can be done), and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Seaplane Base Rehabilitation 2. Name of applicant: City of Renton Agent:Reid Middleton Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Agent: Reid Middleton,Inc. 728 134th Street SW Suite 200 Everett, WA 98204 Attn: Ketil Freeman, 425/741-3800 Owner: City of Renton Municipal Airport 616 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Gail Reed 4. Date checklist prepared: February 10, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton,Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Permitting will be ongoing through April of 1999. Construction will begin in early June of 1999 and be completed by November of 1999. The timing of proposed construction of the existing dock extension noted as Phase II is yet to be determined. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The drawings show a Phase II extension of the existing floating docks. The timing of this extension is not presently known. Future plans may include a waterfront walkway, customer service building, and other access facilities upland from the rehabilitated seaplane facility. 2 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. None known 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. No other proposal directly affecting the seaplane facility is known at this time. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known. City of Renton: Site Plan Approval and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife:Hydraulic Project Approval HPA) United States Corps of Engineers:Section 404 Permit Department of Ecology Temporary Water Quality Certification FAA approval 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposed project involves rehabilitation only of the existing Renton Municipal Airport seaplane base. No change of use is contemplated by the proposed project. The primary component of the project includes demolition of an existing, deteriorated wood seaplane beaching platform and installation of a new floating dock. The existing beaching ramp provided approximately five spaces for seaplanes to moor but due to storm damage is presently unusable. The new floating dock will replace the beaching ramp and provide a seaplane tie-up area for approximately five seaplanes. The proposed project also includes installation of three access ramps to the floats; repair and extension of an existing bulkhead; stabilization of an existing slope with rip rap; repair to an existing storm drain flap gate and the access pier over the flap gate; dredging of accumulated sediments beneath existing floats; and installation of minor water and electrical services to provide means for pressure washing of the docks. A second phase of the project will extend the existing floating dock approximately 60 to 80 feet to the north. The timing of this phase is not presently known. 3 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address,if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal site is located adjacent to and in Lake Washington in the northwest corner of the Renton Municipal Airport at 616 West Perimeter Road. All upland portions of the proposal site are located within the boundaries of the Airport property and are contained within the city limits. However, some existing and overwater portions of the project will occur over City of Renton owned lands in King County. This jurisdictional crossover is noted in a pre-application memorandum from the City of Renton dated January14, 1999. 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a.General description of the site (circle one):J,rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 2% c.What general types of soils are found on the site (for example,clay, sand, gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand and gravel d.Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?if so, describe. Minor shoreline erosion and natural beach fluctuations and sediment accumulation in the nearshore area from adjacent river inflows are present in the site vicinity. e.Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Dredging of accumulated sediments beneath the existing structures is proposed to restore adequate depths for the floating docks to float. Approximately 1,800 cubic yards of sediment is proposed to be dredged. f.Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Proposed elements of the project, including repair and extension of the existing bulkhead and stabilization of an existing slope near the runway terminus, will significantly forestall future erosion. g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Most elements of the proposal will occur over water. No net increase in impervious land surface will result from the proposed project. 1 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Standard best management practices will be required during construction to control erosion due to construction activities. 2.Air a.What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. General emissions from heavy equipment will occur during construction. The proposal site is currently used as a seaplane base. Emissions from seaplanes and vehicles on the ground will continue after construction. By providing tie-up space for the seaplanes, the current need for seaplane taxiing while they are awaiting haul out will be reduced; and, therefore, air emissions will be decreased by the project. b.Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known c.Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a.Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The proposal site is located adjacent to and in Lake Washington. 2 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. The majority of proposed construction will occur waterward of the ordinary high water line. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment will be dredged. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No surface water withdrawals or diversions will be required by the project. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? if so, note location on the site plan. The proposal site is primarily over water. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Not applicable b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn nor will water be discharged to groundwater. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources,if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable 3 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c.Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Not Applicable. The proposal site is primarily over water. No modification to upland areas is proposed as part of this project. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Not Applicable d.Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None 4. Plants a.Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: , cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily,eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation, algal lake bottom plants b.What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No upland vegetation is proposed to be removed. Proposed dredging may disturb algal lake bottom plants. c.List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,if any: None proposed 5. Animals a.Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. X birds: hawk, heron, eagle, sonkbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other X fish: bass,salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b.List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known c.Is the site part of a migration route? if so, explain. Lake Washington serves as a migration route for anadromous fish species. d.Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The proposed project will remove existing treated-timber structures and replace them with steel and concrete structures. The overall footprint of overwater coverage will be reduced. Therefore, shading and coverage impacts will be reduced. The design will also include grated surfaces as feasible for sections of the floats. This will further reduce the amount of shading and impacts to the waters of Lake Washington. Removal of treated timber and reduction of shading and coverage will enhance the migratory route of important anadromous fish, such as salmon, within Lake Washington. 5 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 6. Energy and Natural Resources a.What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical facilities will be installed to the vicinity of the seaplane ramp. The electrical service will provide power for a pressure washer at the head of the docks and lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c.What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None proposed 7.Environmental Health a.Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services will be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None proposed 6 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b.Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The proposal site is adjacent to seaplane and airplane approaches and flight paths to the Renton Municipal Airport. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. General equipment noise during construction from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction operations will be required to adhere to noise ordinances. The completed project will replace the damaged tie-down area and, therefore, reduce the taxing required for operations at the facility. Thus, noise associated with taxing seaplanes will be reduced by the project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a.What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used as a seaplane base. No change in use is contemplated by this project. Adjacent uses include the airport runway to the east and residential use to the west. b.Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No c.Describe any structures on the site. The existing seaplane base has floats, the beaching ramp, and a ramp for launching and retrieving seaplanes. Adjacent to the facility is a restaurant that is not in operation. 7 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No upland structures will be demolished. An existing deteriorated wood seaplane beaching platform will be demolished and removed. e.What is the current zoning classification of the site? Portions of the site within the Renton City Limits and airport boundary are zoned Public(P-I). Some overwater portions are located in King County and are prezoned Heavy Industrial(IH). f.What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Public Use g.If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The proposal site is located within the Urban shoreline environment. h.Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The site is a shoreline/water environment. i.Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No component of the project is residential. No additional employees will be generated by the proposed project. j.Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No people would be displaced by the proposed project. k.Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable 1.Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None proposed 8 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 9. Housing a.Approximately how many units would be provided,if any?Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable b.Approximately how many units,if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable c.Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None proposed 10. Aesthetics a.What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The highest point of proposed floating docks is approximately 2.5' above water. The height of the bulkhead will remain the same. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c.Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None proposed 11. Light and Glare a.What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? No light or glare will be produced by the project. b.Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No 9 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c.What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None known d.Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None proposed 12. Recreation a.What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The facility serves recreational seaplane operators as well as commercial operators. Recreational boating activities occur in the vicinity. b.Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The proposed project will rehabilitate an existing recreational use. c.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. The proposed project will rehabilitate an existing recreational use. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a.Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known b.Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known c.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None proposed 10 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 14. Transportation a.Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the Renton Municipal Airport is available off of North Airport Way. Direct access to the proposal site within the airport boundaries is available via an access road that parallels the primary runway apron. Changed vehicular access to the proposal site is not contemplated by this project. b.Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. The proposed project is for rehabilitation of portions of an existing seaplane dock. No additional employees or vehicle trips will be generated by the proposed project after construction. c.How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe indicate whether public or private). No e.Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The proposed project will rehabilitate a public seaplane dock at the Renton Municipal Airport. f.How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No additional vehicular trips will be generated by the proposed project. 11 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g.Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The proposed project will reduce the taxiing activity of the seaplanes at the site and therefore will reduce transportation impacts within Lake Washington adjacent to the facility. 15. Public Services a.Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection, health care, schools, other)?If so, generally describe. No b.Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None proposed 16. Utilities a.Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b.Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water and electrical service will be extended to the head of the dock to provide for a pressure washer to clean the floats. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: V.--,-() a.,t k,wu r rC Date Submitted: s, s. bjr\wf\renton\seaplane\permit\sepa.doc\ktl 12 aE sure o WASHINGTON Pyi zees e JOINT AQUATIC RESOURCE PERMITS (JARPA) APPLICATION FOR: HYDRAULIC PROJECT APPROVALS,SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMITS, WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION& APPROVAL FOR EXCEEDANCE OF STANDARDS, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SECTION 404 and 10 PERMITS INSTRUCTIONS— This Joint Application can be used to apply for Hydraulic Project Approvals, Shoreline Management Permits, Approvals for Exceedance of Water Quality Standards, Water Quality Certifications and Army Corps of Engineers Permits. You must submit readable copies of the completed application form together with detailed drawings,prepared in accordance with the drawing guidance in Appendix A to the appropriate agencies. Remember,depending on the type of project you are proposing,other permits may be required that are not covered by this application. Use the following checklist to determine which permits to apply for. If you have trouble deciding which permits you need, please contact the appropriate agency for questions. Agency telephone numbers are in appendix B. Your project may require some,or all,of these permits. IF YOU CHECK ANY BOX UNDER A PERMIT TITLE,THEN YOU MUST APPLY FOR THAT PERMIT. Complete Section A & C for any of the permits listed below. Also complete Section B for Shoreline&Corps of Engineers permits. Detailed drawings are required for any of these permits (see Appendix A for drawing requirements). Hydraulic Project Approval issued by the Department of Fish and Wildlife under 75.20 RCW is required if your project includes construction or other work,that: 0 will use, divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any fresh or salt water of the state. This includes all construction or other work waterward and over the Ordinary High Water Line, including dry channels, and may include projects landward of the Ordinary High Water Line(e.g.,activities outside the Ordinary High Water Line that will directly impact fish life and habitat,falling trees into streams or lakes,etc.). Shoreline Substantial Development, Conditional Use, Variance Permit, or Exemption issued by Local Government (under the Shoreline Management Act, 90.58 RCW;) required for work or activity in the 100-year floodpl or within 200 feet of the Ordinary High Water Mark of certain waters;and which includes any one of the following: LppM E dumping;0 drilling;x dredging; 0 filling; C'Ty OF RNONN/NG D placement or alteration of structures(whether temporary or permanent);MAR 2 any activity which substantially interferes with normal public use of the waters regardless of cost. ^ 6 /999 Floodplain Management permits and/or Critical Areas Ordinances review by local government for: CeV D work in frequently flooded areas,geologically unstable areas,wildlife habitats,aquifer recharge areas,and wetlands. A Section 401 Water Quality Certification issued by the Department of Ecology under 33 USC §§ 401 and 1344 is required when a Corps of Engineer's §404 is required. However, the Corps will notify Ecology of the project through the Corps' public notice unless you are applying for a Corps Nationwide Permit. NOTE: Certification of hydropower projects will require additional information—contact Ecology's Shorelands&Water Resources Program for additional permitting requirements. OSend a copy of this application and drawings to Ecology for a 401 Certification only when applying for a Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit,or hydropower projects. Form#JAR-P-4 Revised Date 7/95 Instruction Page 1 of 2 Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance 'ater Quality Standards by the Department of logy, under 90.48 RCW, if your project results in: a temporary exceedance of water quality criteria established by WAC 173-201A for in water work(e.g.,changes in turbidity from sediment disturbances and pH changes from concrete curing). NOTE: Application of aquatic herbicides and pesticides are covered by a separate application-contact Ecology's Regional Office to apply. A Section 404 Permit from the Corps of Engineer under 33 USC §§404 and 1344 is required if your project includes: discharge or excavation of dredged or fill material waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark, or the Mean Higher High Tide Line in tidal areas,in waters of the United States,including wetlands; 0 mechanized land clearing in waters of the United States,including wetlands. A Section 10 Permit from the Corps of Engineer is required for: any work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States(e.g.,floats,piers,docks,dredging,piles,buoys,overhead power lines,etc.). USEFUL DEFINITIONS The following definitions are presented to help applicants in completing the JARPA. They may not necessarily represent specific language from the laws implemented through JARPA. Mean High Water and Mean Higher High Water Tidal Elevations at any specific location can be found in tidal benchmark data compiled by the United States Department of Commerce,Environmental Science Services Administration,Coast and Geodetic Survey, dated January 24, 1979. This information can be obtained from the Corps of Engineers at(206)764-3495. The determination of tidal elevation is obtained by averaging each day's highest tide at a particular location over a period of 19 years, measured from mean Lower Low water,which equals 0.0 tidal elevation. Mean Lower Low is the 0.0 tidal elevation,determined by averaging each day's lowest tide at a particular location over a period of 19 years.It is the tidal datum for vertical tidal references in the salt water area. Ordinary High Water Mark or Line means the mark on all lakes, streams and tidal waters, which will be found by examining the beds and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil or vegetation a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, provided that in any area where the ordinary high water mark cannot be found,the ordinary high water mark adjoining saltwater shall be the line of mean higher high tide and the ordinary high water mark adjoining fresh water shall be the line of mean high water. Shorelands or shoreland areas means those lands extending landward for two hundred feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark;floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward two hundred feet from such floodways; and all wetlands and river deltas associated with the streams,lakes,and tidal waters which are subject to the provisions of 90.58 RCW. Shorelines means all water areas of the state, including reservoirs, and their associated wetlands, together with the lands underlying them,except stream segments upstream of the point where mean annual flow is less than 20 cubic feet per second, and lakes less than 20 acres in size. Wetlands means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands. Instruction Page 2 of 2 AGENCY USE ONLY Agency Reference#: Date Received: SEPA Lead Agency: Other: DARPA APPLICATION FORM- aF,s'Tare o for use in Washington State p tka dy leas S PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN BLUE OR BLACK INK Based on the preceding checklist,I am sending copies of this application to the following: (check all that apply) O Local Government: for shoreline ®Substantial Development 0 Conditional Use 0 Variance 0 Exemption;or 0 Floodplain Management 0 Critical Areas Ordinance O Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for HPA O Washington Department of Ecology Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards O 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permits O Corps Engineers for Section 404 or Section 10 permit(s) SECTION A - Use for all permits covered by this application. Be sure to also complete Section C (Signature Block) for all permit applications. 1. Applicant: City of Renton Mailing Address:616 West Perimeter Road,Renton WA,Attn:Gail Reed,Airport Manager Work Phone: (425)235-2591 Home Phone: ( ) Fax Number: (425)235-2559 If an agent is acting for the applicant during the permit process,complete#2&3. 2. Authorized Agent: Ketil Freeman,Reid Middleton,Inc. Mailing Address: 728 134th Street Southwest,Suite 200,Everett, WA 98204 Work Phone: f425) 741-3800 Home Phone: ( ) Fax Number: (425)741-3900 3. Designation of Authorized Agent,if applicable: I hereby designate Ketil Freeman of Reid Middelton, Inc. to act as my agent in matters related to this application for permit(s). I understand that if a Federal permit is issued,I must sign the permit. 6 ade Rate& Zr if.? Signature Applicant Date 4. Relatio ip of applicant to property: ©Owner 0 Purchaser 0 Lessee 0 Other ( 5. Name,address,and phone number of property owner(s),if other than applicant: Application Page 1 of 5 6. Location where proposed activity exists or will occur: Waterbody: Lake Washington DNR Stream Type(if known) Street Address: 616 West Perimeter Road Tributary of Renton,King, Washington 98055 Legal Description: City,County,State,Zip Code Tax Parcel No.: 072305-9007-0 Eastern Tideland 17 23N 05E t t Section Township Range Western Tideland 17 23 N 05E 7. Describe the current use of the property, and structures existing on the property. If any portion of the proposed activity is already completed on this property,indicate month and year of completion. The site,also known as the Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base,is currently used as a public seaplane base and transient seaplane moorage. Existing over water structures on the proposal site include a deteriorated,treated-wood seaplane beaching platform,an existing floating dock,and a deteriorated wood bulkhead with a concrete cap. Upland portions of the site contain an existing vacant building with accessory parking. No rehabilitation, improvements,or new construction to upland portions of the proposal site is contemplated by this project. No portion of the proposed project has begun. Is the property agricultural land? 0 Yes ®No Are you a USDA program participant? 0 Yes ®No 8. Describe the proposed activity, and the activity's purpose. Include expected water quality and fish impacts, and proposed actions to reduce the duration and severity of those impacts and provide proper protection for fish life. Complete plans and specifications should be provided for all work waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark or Line, including types of equipment to be used,and for all work if applying for a shoreline permit. If additional space is needed,please attach a separate sheet. The proposed project involves rehabilitation only of the existing Renton Municipal Airport Seaplane Base. The primary component of the project includes demolition of an existing,deteriorated wood seaplane beaching platform and installation of a new floating dock. Other components of the project include installation of three access ramps to the proposed floats; stabilization of an existing slope with rip rap and a sheetpile division in front of the deteriorated wood bulkhead;dredging of approximately 1,800 cubic yards of accumulated sediment beneath the existing floats;repair to an existing storm drain flap gate and access pier over the flap gate;and installation of minor water and electrical service to the floating docks to provide means for pressure washing. Another phase of the proposed project involves extension of the existing floating dock. Timing for this phase has yet to be determined. The proposed project is necessary because the existing wood beaching platforms are deteriorating and 1998 storm damage has further eroded their usability. The existing seaplane beaching facility can accommodate approximately five seaplanes. After construction,the rehabilitated facility will provide tie-up space for approximately five seaplanes. Impacts to water quality and fish habitat are expected to be minimal. During construction,a temporary increase in turbidity from in water work is expected. Post construction,the aquatic environment around the seaplane base will be improved. Specifically,existing overwater coverage is approximately 12,500 square feet. The proposed rehabilitation will reduce overwater coverage to 5,200 square feet. This reduction in the overall footprint of overwater coverage will reduce shading impacts and enhance the migratory route of important anadromous fish,such as Salmon, within Lake Washington. Preparation of drawings: See Appendix A-sample drawings and checklist for completing the drawings. One set of original or good quality reproducible drawings must be attached. NOTE: Applicants are encouraged to submit photographs of the project site,but these do not substitute for drawings. THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS REQUIRES DRAWINGS ON 8-1/2 X 11 INCH SHEETS. Larger drawings may be required by other agencies. Application Page 2 of 5 S 9. Proposed Starting Date: June 15,1999 Estimated duration of activity: 5 months Will the project be constructed in stages?®Yes 0 No 10. Will any structures be placed: a. waterward of the Ordinary High Water Mark or Line for fresh or tidal waters?Yes 0 No b. waterward of Mean High Water Line in tidal waters? 0 Yes 0 No 11. Will fill material(rock,fill,bulkhead,pilings or other material)be placed waterward of Ordinary High Water Mark or Line for fresh or tidal waters? Yes 0 No a. If"yes,"in fresh water indicate volume in cubic yards: b. If"yes,"in tidal waters,indicate volume in cubic yards waterward of the line of mean higher high water: 12. Will material be placed in wetlands? 0 Yes ©No If yes,impacted area: acres) If yes: a. Has a delineation been completed? 0 Yes 0 No (If yes,please submit with application.) b. Type and composition of fill material(e.g.,sand,etc.): c. Material source: d. List all soil series (type of soil) located at the project site, & indicate if they are on the county's list of hydric soils: Soils information can be obtained from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly Soil Conservation Service(SCS). 13. Will proposed activity cause flooding or draining of 0 Yes ®No If yes,impacted area: acres) wetlands? 14. Will excavation or dredging be required in water or wetlands? ®Yes 0 No If yes, volume: 1,800 (cubic yards) a Composition of material removed: Accumulated marine sediments b. Disposal site for excavated material: State licensed upland disposal site to be determined. c. Method of dredging: Barge-mounted clam shell bucket 15. List other applications, approvals, or certifications from other Federal, state or local agencies for any structures, construction, discharges, or other activities described in the application (i.e., preliminary plat approval, health district approval, building permit, SEPA review,FERC license, Forest Practices Application, etc.) Also indicate whether work has been completed and indicate all existing work on drawings. Date of Date Completed? Type of Approval Issuing Agency Identification No. Application Approved Yes or No Building Permit City of Renton TBA TBA TBA No SEPA Review City of Renton TBA TBA TBA No SEPA Lead Agency: City of Renton SEPA Decision Date: Application Page 3 of 5 16. Has any agency denied approval for the activity described herein or for any activity directly related to the activity described herein? DYes @No If yes,explain: SECTION B-Use for Shoreline&Corps of Engineers permits only: 17. Total cost of Project. This means the fair market value of the project,including materials,labor,machine rentals,etc. To be determined after final design;project is in the range of$500,000. 18. Local government w/jurisdiction: City of Renton Shoreline Environment designation: Urban Environment Zoning designation: Public(P-1) 19. For corps permits,provide names,addresses,and telephone numbers of adjoining property owners, lessees,etc., Bill Colacurio,Jr. 522 Bourbon Street,New Orleans,LA 70130 Bryn Mawr Plaza L.L.C. 11326 Rainier Avenue South,Seattle, WA 98178 The Lakeshore 11326 RainierAvenue South, Seattle, WA 98178 State of Washington DNR Resource Planning,PO Box 47014, Olympia, WA 98504 PLEASE NOTE: Shoreline management compliance may require additional notice—consult your local government. SECTION C-Complete for any permit covered by this application 20. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. I hereby grant to the agencies to which this application is made,the right to enter the above-described location to inspect the proposed or completed work. 0 t_ _I dette- Z, 1f97 Signature o if pplicant or Authorized Agent(REQUIRED) Date Signature of Landowner(REQUIRED if other than applicant) Date This application must be signed by the applicant. If an authorized agent is to be designated,the applicant must also sign at Item 3. 18 U.S.0 §1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than$10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both. Application Page 4 of 5 DO NOT SEND FEDERAL PROCESSING FEE WITH APPLICATION TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL OFFICIAL A. Nature of the existing shoreline. (Describe type of shoreline, such as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap;and extent and type of bulkheading,if any:) B. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units,existing and potential,that will have an obstructed view: C. If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth in full that portion of the master program which provides that the prop,sed use may be a conditional use,or,in the case of a variance,from which the variance is being sought: These Agencies are Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employers. For special accommodation needs,please contact the appropriate agency from Appendix A. Application Page 5 of 5 1 CITY OF RENTON topM tiPI MRaq tON MEMORANDUM l4 u /999cE/VFp DATE: January 11 , 1999 TO: Jennifer Henning FROM: Paul Lumbert SUBJECT: Sea Plane Base Rehabilitation - Preliminary Application Note on Preliminary Review Comments Contained In This Report: The following comments on development and permitting issues are based upon the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on programmatic, site planning and other design changes made by the applicant. Sanitary Sewer: No connection or work for sanitary sewer system proposed by the project. The project is in the vicinity of "metro” Bryn Mawr trunk sewer line. Contact "King County Metro" for location. Water: No water system improvements are proposed by the project. Additional water main/fire hydrants must meet fire flow/Fire Codes per Renton Fire Department if required. Storm Drainage: The project proposes to repair the existing storm drain flap gate and construct new access pier to the above storm drain gate. January 11, 1999 Page 2 Street Improvements: The project only has access to Lake Washington and Airport Property thus no street improvements are required. General: No permits required for utility or street improvements. All permits for construction will be through the Building Department. Check with the Washington State Fisheries Department for any permits they may require. 1.)3 - 6 '1'72A1 R5E W 1/2 U3 • to •1•1.3N 1Ur, t: S$1-12th St0f00 $ J / t, j 7--.:41st, - .- II 5-9. 160-- 1 gy p 0kQ 4 j t 913.i 75l • i_.1j,J If, . I 4• yp Im l5t t i — ._ Qne 1n S 115t1,IPt I S 115 lh P _ 1 — m — \ I J 1 III Ku+ i^ r.-i-1_i_,_. II-4.-'- S bl h IS \ ISI1)6th At11H-711121— i 116th, S 1 6--f a_ I' 83 i-. i 1 T1.i• 9l1 i y_i.4_ __ 14 i { I 1_ 1 -- m 1116t8h1 Q 1 _ ' 1 1 S;11t1h;St Sl 11Dth S __ 1 9'-° D 1? II ' 1 IA - $--_4A O90 109_ o 1 I ' .1.1. I1 171 ' I u 1 — 1 I Lt79 1 1 y11r,.,__1f_I.....•I- Ir 11I7th1PlShI7tHRtIIlyllttnIp8 _ .80 gt .. 1I I I I 1.-!-1-.1..."1- ----- 7-i-rj•rrlid:::: 110 _1 . i J 4) I CL Isiah:I a----- e--- _.... _ eT. Ir-i1 I i-- I 441Sp_bh:St, t I I I j - - \ 1 909 12c7FITTEF_ r 1 ---1 e-s 1 1 1 - •, I> I S 1120:th St: -I I 1 4 ET j291 I , . 'Po --- p195 L5 21'st_S __1 s1zuS.St 1 r t32" - 33 I i 3 -- - ,SII2 s St I r„..1 t 1 S -2z d 11 1 1 136--- __ '13 y- _ 5.1-' I i' Ii ITT- III Renton Municipal Airport II-I-I---- 197— I 40- 1I j I i 1 '-- A IP P 90711 V—II ' 21 vo t 1 41 1 /1 I_0' 24 1 t „,. m • r- r- -1. ; , I 1 19123rd -..._ 1 I :... I. 1 i I1'-• i ; a-1 e.e to-14 1, 1 . 1=_ 26 1 906 1 eu y _i F Lh=O1146 I 1 1 y i tso'isi s- •l th L s 1 t r--•.-..._._ •y \ 69it V.----1241th.1Pt 11 1 157 i %%I 1 1 140 }35 I ' 1.{301 l 1• 18 1 1; 11 6'.G 32 1i 7 th•Plr-I' 1 yL 1I-•,• •1 1 1 I b 1 1 I IZ I I : 8' 131\8' 67 60 5 I 1• { 1 33 NW 5th Pt1, r-4 I I _ 156 \ c 5- 17 ' 4 mQ._\e:0 N' 5'kf'1.....\ 0! ?...":„\C, i.• k, . f 7 0• 54 - 51>1_ . m -•,---- • Lt4u3 0. r.— 12 It 19 173 \,,. r'--- e• `a 9 % Th lE\, `i . 0• AIRPORT 55 y'1-i. ','S -m L.. __ - 5 t37-.4 . . 76- , 65 LIFT STATION I I 3 _ A m 119> b/ 1 N 904_ 47__ .%43 c9! 1 m- 17 2 11 \ aL•— i 34 W 4th t• + i it I 11 -1. I-- —I- (-- i i 1 ii 5! SA47-4t, F3 • 18T23NR5EW1/2 F3 - 18T23NR5E1' S,ew Y 71. CAL SERVICES 5307 Z P,13,1'R'TECI IICAI,SERVICES 5 3 0FNt0Q22S/98 d r D3 . 6 T23N R5E E L rq tl-1 v.ri-: 404 4 iwa— iip!MI;Ipgr.,...... ... .../ we 44 1, ` 77,, n...m i rf I'. , en-. i uts vts-1 ri 6 ..• I .23-1 p t. nn-r l .0 I I r Z 1( 0 .. vt,•t r 1.1.414 1 • 9 t.-1 C lei,` enton unicipa Airpor l lr t ,• r., e I r' ‘ utr•a i(\..:•' .\\ \ s' i'....i. 3.\.(\. f \ '1 1 ,•• .iy v.n.t un-f IIcr.l.Lr•t IILr•I (rlMr•,v-f UI>•; t,•1 7,, 7NCA L,.St ' ',;. D n 1 0 so l t 1 ' Ir r St.-. h. > Ell I LLII.] Mtr.Y • t t\r• t 1S x`1 11" 1-rt if h A7.' <, ‘ -Sv( s7V/(kv, F3 - 18 T23N R5E E 1/2 UTILITIES DIVISION Renton City Malta I:4E00 E E! P/H/PW TECHIIICAL SERVICES C•.ree ei..r.•n as.. 1C mown 4,Fyul-0 04/06/98 7 T23N R5E E L ' CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: January 14, 1999 TO: Pre-Application File No. 99-01 FROM: Jennifer Toth Henning SUBJECT: Seaplane Base Rehabilitation Pre-Application Comments 1. General. We have completed a preliminary review of the pre-application materials for the above- referenced development proposal. The following comments on development and permitting issues are based on the pre-application submittals made to the City of Renton by the applicant. The applicant is cautioned that information contained in this summary may be subject to modification and/or concurrence by official decision makers (e.g., Hearing Examiner, Zoning Administrator, Board of Adjustment, Board of Public Works, and City Council). Review comments may also need to be revised based on site planning and other design changes required by City staff or made by the applicant. The applicant is encouraged to review all applicable sections of the Renton Municipal Code. As we understand the proposal, the Renton Seaplane Base at the north end of the Renton Municipal Airport would be rehabilitated. The existing wood seaplane beaching platforms would be demolished, a new floating dock with multiple access ramps would be installed, the existing floating dock would be extended, the existing concrete bulkhead would be repaired and extended, an existing slope would be stabilized,the existing storm drain flap gate would be repaired and a new access pier would be installed, and accumulated sediments beneath existing floats would be dredged. The area of over- water improvements to be demolished equals 12,500 s.f. The entire project is on located on land considered to be Shorelines of the State. It appears that the City of Renton would be lead agency for the regulation of activity within the project area; however, only a portion of the site is located within the City's corporate limits. According to correspondence with the Airport Manager,the City of Renton owns the area within and outside the City boundaries. If the City is interested in annexing this area, the process is relatively short and straightforward. RCW 35A.14.300 states that a code city may annex territory outside the city limits for municipal purposes when such territory is owned by the city. The annexation would not be subject to review by the Boundary Review Board. And the process takes about 2 months, with routing, notification and scheduling. 2. Zoning. Much of the project site has land area beneath it. Only a portion of the site is zoned, since much of the site area is located outside of the Renton corporate limits. The zoning that does apply to the Municipal Airport is Public or P-1. The intent of the P-1 Zone is to provide and protect suitable environments for social and physical services and facilities. Municipal airports are permitted TS SERVER\SYSZCOMNION\HADIVISIGN.S\DEVELOP.SER\DEV&PLAN.INGVTH\PRE-APPS\SEAPLN.DOC January 12, 1999 Page 2 as a principal use. Seaplane base operations are not specifically addressed in the Renton Code. The sea plane base is considered to be inherent to the municipal airport use. It appears that the only development standard that would apply relates to noise. Section 4-2-090C.6. states: "Truck traffic and other noise normally associated with an operation shall be limited to the hours between seven o'clock(7:00) a.m. and seven o'clock(7:00)p.m. unless the Hearing Examine shall find that due to the specific circumstances of the particular application, other hours of operation should be established in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare." All projects within the P-1 Zone require Site Plan Review. However, if it is determined that the proposal requires a Conditional Use Permit,then the project would be exempt from Site Plan Review. The area outside of the Renton city limits is pre-zoned Heavy Industrial (IH). The standards of the 1H would not apply unless the area is annexed into the City. 3. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. The City's Shoreline Master Program permits new commercial seaplane bases in industrial areas provide such bases are not contiguous to residential areas. Docks for mooring of seaplanes are permitted. Seaplanes may be stored on the dock or ramps. Tie down areas may be provided on seaplane ramps. Landscaping is required around parking areas per City Parking and Loading standards. The landscaping must be compatible with activities and characteristics of the aircraft in that it should be wind resistant, low profile, and able to survive under adverse conditions. The demolition of the existing seaplane beaching platform and construction of a new floating dock with multiple access ramps would probably be evaluated using the criteria for boat-launching ramps see section 4-3-010L 3). The Code Section states that the water depth should be deep enough off the shore to allow use by boats. Water currents and movement and normal wave action shall be suitable for ramp activity. The ramp should be designed so as to allow for ease of access to the water with minimal impact on the shoreline and water surface. The surface of the ramp may be concrete, pre-cast concrete, or other hard permanent substance. The material shall be permanent and noncontaminating to the water. Loose materials such as gravel or cinders are not allowed. The selected material shall be appropriate considering the following conditions: soils characteristics,erosion, water currents, waterfront conditions, and usage of the ramp. The Master Program also states that the proposed area should not present major geological or topographical obstacles to construction or operation of the ramp. And, site adaptation such as dredging shall be minimized. Extension of the existing floating dock is permitted by the Shoreline Master Program. Section 4-3- 090L.12.c.iii encourages the expansion of existing piers and docks over the construction of new facilities. The dock or pier length is not to extend beyond a length necessary to provide reasonable and safe moorage. The dock or pier is not interfere with the public use and enjoyment of the water nor create a hazard to navigation. Open pile construction is required, except floating docks may be permitted where there is no danger of significant damage to an ecosystem, where scenic values are high, and where conditions such as extreme water depth, a soft bottom condition or ledge rock bottom are present. The new access pier would be subject to the requirements of the Shoreline Master Program and would be allowed for water-dependent commercial use. The length of a commercial dock may extend to 150 January 12, 1999 Page 3 feet or until a depth of 30 is reached(provided that the dock does not exceed 250 feet in length). The maximum width of dock is limited to 12 feet. Commercial docks shall be placed no closer than 30 feet to the side property lines. Extension of the existing concrete bulkhead is permitted only to protect upland areas or facilities, where rip-rap cannot provide the necessary protection; and when the bulkhead design has been engineered and approved by the City. Dredging of the accumulated sediments beneath the existing floats is only permitted when it is necessary for flood control purposes;to correct problems of material distribution and water quality;to obtain additional water area so as not to decrease the intrusion into the lake of public or private marina dock; of the maintenance of public shoreline parks; to maintain water depth and navigability; is part of a MOTCA action. Several requirements apply to dredging and the applicant is advised to obtain a copy of the Shoreline Master Program. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit is prepared by the City then sent to the Washington State Department of Ecology for a 21-day appeal period. Shoreline Permits cannot be sent onto the State until final action has been taken on SEPA and any appeal periods have been completed. 4. Environmental Review. The project is subject to environmental (SEPA) review as it is on lands covered by waters. An environmental checklist would need to be submitted with the application packet. The SEPA review would be processed concurrently with the other land use approvals. 5. Site Plan Review. It appears that the proposal is subject to Site Plan Review. The Site Plan Review would most likely be an administrative land use application and would be processed concurrent with the SEPA application. A public hearing would be triggered only if a variance from the Shoreline Master Program is needed. cc: Jana Huerter 41106, . i i 't . rtn. t ,, ,:.,,,,,,,,_,.....::...::.... t x.:..t.irocl ..„...; .,. 4a...„.....,.. . t. y ii tr 444,..1.,.., ... . .i.,..,.,4..? ,. :(,,„tr.....,. 1....... .,,„„,.. . 11...,.. . ,.,.,.......;„.... I.- 4„...,.. . .i.. ''t; 44...,,s,-...' -,:,.1,--:.," 1. •• r" , •. " Fi a t 1 11i,,Kir,.. 3,.../.:„, 00. .,jr-ir.. 1 xiii . 4iiiit..04, . _.....1v,._ ., ,.,,,,o,,s,„_,.. ...,2*. t, it„,,,,t741 .1...4..,',:---.Y•e+4•":". ';,, &S, 1 , y,..To..:111...t4"1{::7'.!• T' itte*".'' w: L. "„..,.. :". . 1 . .. tii t... .., t zil . . rsr.sw,. A,, g.. Yil..e.4.a y3,. . ,a' C-- i .t .t t }: #x ate! 'F"41Ps it 3 „r,T3 X+ a r „.,' b y ti Y +S ha xrC lam# a'y 0.ir r'k t ,f! y` f 1 S,` + v N i' h. •:'4"'' •ya" yx• v'F:'t'r . :tw 'i, 4, i t` c y vit r ' 14, 15. ?!.."''11 rs t r s 4 • tibri. ' +'if ,., a, • ", i 7e 9 i•', A J r• w. ' t " sfi • I t• f1:1 '``" sn'" --'r`; ` .. 4 • ..07. fi r+sy z• if r s ss,.rt, 11' ' peg L A 7.1° J r • l .S r r,, T "'+ 4• ad•CF i`r e' r cY rim e.i+ s4. j , s,'# i p ° .. ty rnr"'R 4 ti'il` r4't'C*,r' { •,r , T aC f 4• z TT l•, r,,' i;:„,::-4_... k,-, f-41.‘1, q.44.• ST 1,: r.-.—.._•_-----„; ' , •.. ,.-.--,-,4..,..-.':, S. f C,. t, Yr i•. '. fir'#}' ' P y. -,L' § r Izi d 1 tJP4 f rr pe s F • e 3. ri t.r=^'x'. btu w' yZc. -.: t +""# f t c t` '~ : r ,1n l .... ...-.+%. r. tt: Trrt # }} ;` ` r .,f 1+ L ., vsy: x4 y' rt Sjey} s_ . tk a ', 1....=tnttie,,,, '-‘tinirl A-."...,,,---. .. —= ',..-.,iim-,:i .',,,,'44.t7 y1 t4dtis'* S ;Jy :. 4.44 '. ' _ Our' yN M^ K 8` i cAj k ! r,IF 1#,! k ;, .1- waif 1a -:, t .5 a r : r., pa 7r 1! Y f 1 x•.. w (z. i tt. 1- y q w ,,.:5.+,t :.ai.( 'i s r } .•i <'3. # N "' v t z., ^J ti a x i.; t o 4 44 y¢ " M 1 ' 1, C,';':;'i ttkk s Y+ Ysr.y +4, r, fi. ° t{ i 'iy, n r s v•w.'ia4. ihr: iii tYZ' t /l h Sr1A0 x r:., 0,.:.,,,,::-.:,,: 1r tttr.j,4ny r x ' i' n : e,tp '..:,.,.„ at t E!.v, ir_''-t :>'ef. g. ......:, t .r a. . 41".s.,e, /t_•- Renton Corporate Bounc 'y p -C.-G., 3o I 1c.., v. : .I0' 9 8 F 9 {' I o o 1, crOr AS9 I S v w -t'VAC 5T. 0o0 a a SST. N o 1 '• s e 3• p h P koO P QS to A K1 40y T+ ale 2010 G2 0285 Oat o 18 0 o S / r bd ; IP o I f yo° d ss•.< L ruNE. B g.R '' 1, 2 001A.N • a • 1° f` N P 4o 3 RELOC'j6.39 D•29386110387-Z7-Z8 E µ-ro- OR V o !.o Q O I ,, 9O LA ,10 p 1 M 29 4.5.3 - ;` R H 1Z° 0 p06 b e.51. S& 94%83 v SNoR£LWE Pe 198° \AERIAL p loro 3'yt _ . a 88-27 z8E RENTON o r'o. /300 1a E=I:Z t 35S a g 1vvt? 60a° 4 15 hs 9 2 a T.- 5 t, 010 0o1 19.55 1' o/ o, 0 21 .3a 2s• N Go EA5T- 4,,=-,, AC. (I 3 0 fo PARK , t• fie°°a-- ' h ,. 4oy so 52 m I c° 00 mod/ p 0o°° f2 • sAt.?z PARK 11 to 0010 LO I.-3 le° O c Z i t 0 o° 11O CJ /S ` 6 0` 4`, h 0° v At O N v 15 g ' I15 Y' 09 h 90 v ka at 0 9 by to .4 o 7 t02ti1 Q o •. 8 : 0 1 i • o-0• o ti v h h on ro Y 1-, 20 y to v z x it. . y2 0 k + 1 YAC. G.7- s + r T ti y-VAC• L- •24 %, J6 II5TH PL.S. g N 9- 2- 24 1141,f 33 i 5_29•ca i144- s 89-19E VAc• /-12L ` ra3K .< m w frI4543oH 5T.) 1 a N 8° ;‘-'•._...4d 4o so Q9.16 1 1 2 5 a 18 a 1 2 a r3 °y o< 12 3 :14 .. 15. i H 15od F `p y?N r da' yticp 3p',.: 15 111 17 ,,,N ti o K,., s I,. S B9-l9E 2a5• .Lj 3 LI._g 115 yn 3S ') p.s•nxdy N i0 50.73 . ie4.t{ v. V 0`Ov` 7 16 , Sc u 116TH A\'\ ST. a w G Mp. 1.6•6 V GL r•40. . 'b 9:ioa°:, p. . 11,46t O\'061p' I' ago y l loc. / . 6o'1iohc .w •• go Z rse Q 1._Off•\ 9 \7 y 1v 15 L* O oU 04.14° c 8 H,' oo vi..d 2 h L p' Ap 13 s ENO 3• 0°, N r n 9 lln 9 S ti h 9t00014h it 816.05 = 12 a . . - '` . . K 58949 E /75.bt(f y K K YL PVAC. 5.C. /5l037/ Sy 0090 I uJ V 40 3 go3y, 3144 L 8912 3°11 ° v, + Y 1 U Q Q J :°,) O o.( lpIla 010.85 - a - • M M 50 M 1 Y k SC r Y a I2„ QInky n ,4 , t qb ,eo N 4grs 1.4? . . 1 r , d 0 0 Z= Zz I C ' s 56}5 2 1 d e l se.. 40 4. 4a.yt # 9 w rIT -1 y l./ ° L trV >I I I 1 A '07.91 3~\ .--%\-tI / J 9V 3 .' , i I 1 1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS LAND USEPERMIT SUBMITTAL WAIVED MODIFIED COMMENTS: REQUIREMENTS: BY BY Calculations, Survey, Drainage Control Plan z Drainage Report 2 Elevations, Architectural 3 AND a Elevations, Grading 2 P, Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 Existing Easements (Recorded Copy) 4 Flood Plain Map, if applicable4 J Floor Plans 3 AND 4 Geotechnical Report 2ANo 3 tLl G of time 5t-/1 Grading Plan, Conceptual 2 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 King County Assessor's Map Indicating Site 4 Landscaping.Plan;Conceptual a Legal Description 4 List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Mailing Labels for Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master Application Form 4 Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parking, Lot Coverage & Landscaping Analysis 4 qy Plan Reductions (PMTs) 4 Postage 4 Public Works Approval Letters Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 Topography Map (5' contours)3 Traffic Study 2 Tree Cutting/Vegetation Clearing Plan 4 d Utilities Plan, Generalized 2 Wetlands Delineation Map 4 ietlands Planting Plan r iv'etlands Study 4 This requirement may be waived by: p, Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: SGaplav1C ‘9‘26. rQe,,"'{{ Public Works Plan Review Section Q Building Section DATE: / r I Development Planning Section CITY OF RENTON LL 1055 South GradyWayRenton, Washington 98055g NOVNDY 0 E'0 0 0 5wit ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED PB VIET Eft 715840i U.S. POSTAGH Jim Morgan 3103 Mountain View Ave N Renton,WA 98056 4' II-DELIVERABLE ms.:. 1T ' TURN TO SENDER s. .. Ei rA ter.S``'+— f i£i£ilf fi f!£ffi N 3 i ff FfSlf f 1 ff i Fi? fFf 0 0 CITY OF RENTON 0 `F li 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 NOV 0 CO 0 P% - Q 5 5 E 4Y1 T1 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED FB:,eTEn 7158401 u.s. POSTAGE_. t Bruce Miller 3103 Mountain View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 L1YERABLE , " . t DDRESSED "' b, 01 i, :5U TO FORWARD "C..:Y T' 14'.TIAN TO SENDER G 1 d. i j jj jj j !! #! ii FF (! j jJj# ii jjJ ii i i ( jfi\ r_' 'r/ :1,2: r'G. llfltffft12t1f2tfllIttttl2lflItIJIJI2flffitlfitiftf2 fiiiinft Ancerson & faker 3187 V \/ 2________4 I 22 March 1999 DOCK2BFCD L0,1,2,5,6,7,10,15,16,17,19,22) DockN . 158"e'134"e)(107N/831 (72"/48") (66"/421 (44"/20") (38"/16")24"/0")OLW Mark (20' ASL) \ North fence line per Webb survey Se er V _ V 7 7 7 BH Ref. Poir.;. a,,129.e© /c, J2L12EA v f. 1 i.,,,, s if.F 07 4'?:- t.c 1 3:2' -. ' - '4 7, e. 4,7,1Iilr, I 2p, i l" 1I 1 1 1 ,, --- -,1 /1 ,:,.,,,,,,,v) J. I 'i''.."- 1 , I 1 I 7 3g" 4" x ;1 1" Legend, Scale 1 " = 10' I 1 n"Old piling, water depth n" at OHW 7 est On* Water depth measured n" at C HI I i LNGm' tpp" CND N NTickmark, m' from BH Pef Point OF ReDom'/ Survey pin I CITY yc 9 r OHW Ordinary High Water (22' ASL) i I QR• OLW - Ordinary Low Water (20' ASL) M re ASL - Above Sea Level I C v L EH - Bulk Head48"44" I J J 38' 3C" BH Ref Point - Point distances measured from/bulkhead 1 at ll f- S Property Line a Seaplane Ramp Deck 13'1 ?'; 1 1 0'1 100' 1 90' I 80' 60'I 5 r 40' 30'I 20' 1 t!• 0 0 © CITY OF RENTON r w1 j;' ''; _""' . CA sal. Planning/Building/Public Works a i,,, : a r r114 04'99 r,.4 - 0 .3 151055SouthGradyWay - Renton Washington 98055 W CA L91 lj ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a :5. 9 9 F a 0flettroll g.t`. 1C1,1, 1 41 dejlAC ) 1 N ' Steve Fujiki 3114 Lake Washington Blvd Nt Renton, WA 98056 it) 1C RF,SSEE i) UNKNO N 4f 310- IIiIiiI„IiI1ii„Id,d,tudtd 1:1"11f.IlH,LI„{I.f,i1{d.di1:11t.4 0 A c!, N 1 ' T2 04...pe .M 9 L.. 11 1 I' 2Qb 1 — 0Y1114A TZ kry•C. . VI 1... 4 oq-- ',-,•-, 07 ki, r8 Jet i',G Al A Lik n 1.1"`AJZ 13 ZA,TA Reiter's Marine Construction and Repair, Inc. for: Lowell Anderson and Laurie Baker Dock Project 3107 Mountain View Avenue NN4/#' Renton WA, Lake Washington 2-16-99 Scale: 1" = 40' 7!1117. 0 20 40 60 80 k 186' 1 Property Line Z H.W.M. a. xisting Bulkhead Lake Washington et 14.82 L—C2s.8i li I -. ma123.99 / Nor; Sq. Ft. Total HouseaH 75.22 O 83.37' 1.,...," 29.8' --fN O 185 r+ awl Property Line 334210-0365-04 TUNICS PAULINE M 353535 3008 LK WASH BLVD N RENTON WA 98056 334210-3610-03 GOETZ ROBERT L 029999 3209 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N RENTON WA 98055 334210-3840-37 PETTIBONE HELEN 0 779999 3205 MT VIEW AVE N RENTON WA 98056 334210-3855-09 YOUNG GARY F 8N3836 3115 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N RENTON WA 98056 334210-3860-02 LINDBERG LLOYU A 1N3864 3111 MT VIEW AVE N RENTON WA 98056 334210 3890-06 MILLER BRUCE E+PANELA J. 659999 3103 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N RENTON WA 98056 334210-3905-09 BURR ROBERT H R1178 3013 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N RENTON WA 98055 334210-3906-08 SAVOY DONALD L 680226 3015 MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE N RENTON WA 98056 334210-3920-00 MORRISON SYLVIA 712615 1401 N 34TH ST RENT(3N WA 98056 334210-3930-08 FIX M MONICA 609999 3007 MOUNTAIN VIEW AYE N RENTON WA 98056 SWN, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 51ATF 19 41' 1 CITY OF RENTON i=°ma DEVELOPMF .''^PLANNING CITY C` ON DEC 2 7 2000DE d•_•_• si::::x ws'ii:.' iFyCj 3yy :xey C P1 1 RECEIVED STATE OF WASHINGTON RGCiv.. DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190- 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 December 21, 2000 I certify that I mailed a copy of this document to the persons and addresses listed thereon,postage prepaid,in a receptacle for United States mail in BellltrWashington on Lesley Nishihira 40 ,2000. Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department zv2wtK -i a 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 - 3232 Laurie Baker and Lowell Anderson 3107 Mountain View Ave. North Renton WA 98056 Dear Ms. Nishihira,Ms. Baker and Mr. Anderson: Re: City of Renton Permit#LUA-99-049;SME,SV BAKER,LAURIE; ANDERSON,LOWELL-Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development/Variance Permit 2000-NW-40043 The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced Shoreline Substantial Development/Variance permit to construct a 2729 square foot, 105 foot long, 8 foot wide dock for a single family residence at 3107 Mountain View Avenue North within shoreline jurisdiction of Lake Washington in the City of Renton. We concur that the proposal, as conditioned by the City of Renton,meets the intent of the master program and the criteria set forth in WAC 173-27-150 for granting a Substantial Development Permit and WAC 173-27-170 for granting a Variance Permit. The permit is hereby approved. This approval is given pursuant to requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. Other federal, state, or local approvals may be required. Those developments and activities authorized by the subject permit may not begin until twenty- one (21) days from the transmittal date of this approval letter, or until conclusion of any review proceeding (appeal)initiated within the twenty-one day period. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. 18 Lesley Nishihira Laurie Baker Lowell Anderson December 21, 2000 Page 2 If you have any questions on the above action, please contact Marcia Geidel at (360)407-6322 Sincerely, V,(11,M1Ybi--; L/kvi1/14-14/iCar--- Jeannie Summerhays, Section Supervisor Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program JS: MG:mg VARA.DOC Enclosure THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT. City of Renton PERMIT SDP and Variance#LUA-99-049;SME,SV ISSUING AGENCY) APPLICANT: Laurie Baker and Lowell Anderson DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PERMIT#2000 -NW- 40043 DATE RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT: June 16,2000 APPROVED X DENIED THIS CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE _x_ PERMIT IS APPROVED X / DENIED_ BY THE DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 90.58 RCW. DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS: As conditioned by city. DATE i L, 2000 Jeannie Summerhays, SectionsorP e>rr of RENTUN CURRENT PLANNING.WVISION ....:. AFFIE kVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING;: On the .}fits day of DDe'liv'be- , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing >hc chi,t documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing D e or 4 L(LA.cyj, PFt-o H C,ev\ I,t loe t h 2ely S W a_4c)<-vt-v Cc In Trvu -h ' Signature of Sender) ff,tw vie STATE OF WASHINGTON SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that rrc?r signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fo(—the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. MART < Notary Publi n and for the State of shington NOTAhY PUBLIC ' Notary (Print)STATE OF WASHINGTON My appointmegigRipirtswACHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03JUNE29, 2003 Project Name:1.p- 0-v-I c Project Number: LUH , q q , 09-0 sv S VV) NOTARY2.DOC CITY OF RENTON CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT November 29, 2000 EXEMPTION FILE NO.: LUA-99-049, SV, ECF, SME PROJECT NAME: Baker/Anderson Residential Dock & Bulkhead OWNER/APPLICANT: Laurie Baker& Lowell Anderson PROJECT MANAGER:Lesley Nishihira; (425)430-7270 PROPOSAL: The applicants, Lowell Anderson and Laurie Baker, are proposing the construction of a 749 square foot dock for use by a single family residence located on the Lake Washington shoreline. Included with the proposal is the removal of an existing concrete bulkhead and its replacement with an enhanced vegetated shoreline. The proposed shoreline enhancement would involve the removal of approximately 22 cubic yards of soil, concrete and non-native vegetation. In addition to the placement of rocks, approximately 40 cubic yards of natural lakeshore material and native plants would be installed. The restored shoreline would meander landward from the current ordinary high water mark. Residential docks are typically exempt from the requirements for a shoreline substantial development permit. However, the applicant is seeking approval of a variance in order to exceed the maximum length permitted by the City's Shoreline Master Program. A public hearing before the Hearing Examiner for dock component of the project is scheduled for the requested shoreline variance October 17, 2000. PROJECT LOCATION:3107 Mountain View Avenue North LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 54-55, Block A, Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden SEC-TWN-R: 31-24N-5E WATER BODY: Lake Washington v WHARF SIT Ei- `f: it^_. r . 33RD K NNYDA . 71 a SLIP O IJo 11 16 r IA:C .=1 all N.32ND Ni SITE Z 1 '. l!' Id l5 16 17 M w: 1 7 . it r I. o N. 31ST iiiigrA r 4— Egrilai 2 . vi is<„toriomOD:..ti7.64......... i...t 0 am" Es Judi....../ 01.400•00N. ow :m IJ is IS IA 1 A iilIMI 1 . ..'711:n.: M.iiiii . ..,:v ;v# ts. in tam 2 lal 3 3 N.3-0TH sme 1 D An exemption from a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit is hereby granted on the proposed project described for the following reason(s): X Normal maintenance of repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. 1. "Normal maintenance" includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation from a lawfully established condition. 2. "Normal repair" means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition, including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance, within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction, except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resource or environment. 3. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including, but not limited to, its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or environment. X Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences. A"normal protective" bulkhead includes those structural and nonstructural developments installed at or near, and parallel to, the ordinary high water mark for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single family residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if it is constructed for the purpose of creating additional dry land. Additional construction requirements are found in WAC 173-27-040(2)(c). The proposed development is consistent or inconsistent with (check one): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT X Policies of the Shoreline Management Act. The guidelines of the Department of Ecology where no Master Program has been finally approved or adapted by the Department. X The Master Program. jeJ(Litle]t(Igt I1Ao%v Neil Watts, Director Development Services Division ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT: 1. The City has a public sewer main in Lake Washington adjacent to this site. The main must be properly located and protected prior to the start of construction. The contractor is to notify the Renton Maintenance Division (425-235-2585) prior to starting work in the lake to schedule an on-site preconstruction meeting. Attachments: Site Plan Vicinity Map cc: Applicant File Department of Ecology Attorney General sme OHW Su T IT:Ni( 71 R`.i POST ATTACH SILT 6O.N.W. FENCIATTACH TO TOP N2I.85• OF POST m t26tilIz iLy LN2/oe_coo.Dt- s 2In h ,' /-,.\ POST ANCHOR O1 reliM-1 (42ave.. 2r.i.H .D(,12esv L mW l WEIGHTS Or". ti,\/ \ LAKE 6-10'0/C J3 i iv i j BOTTOM 6'f 4 1vti i\i\"\ \/ j/\ AAA N,/i LAKE 0 e. - -y1D BOTTOM I 6'TO B• IL w/7 •'' y^ 1 "'MAX KL+I L/&'.&T G/i 15 SILT FENCE INSTALLATION DETAIL AVOID 4t2 Le- INSTREMOVE SILT FENCE PRIEN TO S'(2 L\M 15t PtT+'.^i L ( . /P.)REMOVE SILT FENCE WHEN PROJECTCONSTRUCTION 1COMPLETED S^ 4--RAMP-FES-IGL LtT.Ie. 12E BuL4 JJ 9 ro.4K I ' ` 1Z0 LC6IE Eig'Tk4Co 2Ef flJ84(o W'1 I to,.) I 1, s,^Ou I " poop.- vim 1 .r,,,: k V s-r Iax1 KTnJCo G 7LJ AB nmErigi 0 o I?,Ly 21.8 rr...,, ,o1L w 1 o) to Ls ?K o STD DETAIL a-, o 0Ptaq. E)c Sav up W I Ur1v Q.M1 klddi k ACV s7t'b¢CUIJe ii\11 .` To Flus1-1 w/L AREA TeM LILeLI,t I f'L VYs 170r-k Wm•llki cl2.4-eb J QEA . V Gt?evEL 44 i OW RE6?oR.51.101z. to-in Ear ,ED lilt d6 Sl-Iowa r,+yP b' il< / E D K"1-110 oI-IWM-2.11 g 1 hL-r 21G W617414. I ' • e,•LAGE.ww/VI UE h1'bt2ELIIJ E. 12a 1 a if) One L6,r1 s-b12.LIJI pr.-At-w/PLILlTI F w' 4Tetar-1De, vsL r. ,-r,emit.guLk vAu .[1 el6cLFlu, 'V'fop of ALID I X1sT DxYF,iv d`C E,1T Pam, t V)eYGE-.p- IJ bE REHovep, GIRGI,l:l7 d12EA(4egpIAJI a Leave. b i4T axes--v1 4 }pwr.-feet a'wh1-21.8 T I r-• 4-.•i/vim'_ 3 I=D I,6,kr,Sl-b2-IMP S '-%.6' Wo 152tLII-1 Pr-A.1I,( P) 0= o X raaa.. srarrIU.>•I s W. ,, aorr.,-aa-+--rrars-laT. g sir=' I-. 2 Wri rya r' a a d f--- * ‘-•<'• 4111 i . 1 V— -- -- - 44.e....v 4,2F6 st i 1 1 R—e - I iii. TR-imis: 1 i• ---- a Al u0 I i F ^ • 1. 41 1,12.:I-14RIB . mil, r_,_, I., 1 [1 guainiaminum.i 1 i 1? 35 R— I • _ 2 44,6 iiri , , ! , R 15 Air*1 ef--- p .4luEJIrRScAyIt313L1 C'S R-$ N i 3?nici St. MAWS Ali 3l11GC711 a 1 i 1 ! 1 II[3 11 1. ` ' ' j , r,,-..,+ 1 ' . 1 CC 12 la RI3J11 I 0 _cc i 103211 r ' 1 I 1 ccf 1 C II I - t,1iPV -8 _ CC FL 4,004 R 8 l U ZO I. i0 R$ -. el A$ I ; i I I . N 28th r --- I877---r-i 111 I Air i 1---1 13• ell iii_i N 2:11P1611. - r• .. ntl Q411R-41 r0ill, C3 zoxtxa t 31 T24N R5E E 1/2 CIT Y. OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator December 6, 2000 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit/Variance for Baker/AndersonDock File No. LUA-99-049;SME,SV Gentlemen: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on November 30, 2000. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at (425) 430-7270 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, 4,47L, Lesley Nishihira Project Manager Enclosures: Copy of Original Application Affidavit of Public Notice/Publication Site Plan SEPA Determination cc: Office of Attorney General Applicant chltr 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 R1 Thic manor rnntains fir%rervrled material_20%nost cnnsumer CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA-99-049, SV, ECF, SME DATE RECEIVED: August 9, 2000 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: August 21, 2000 DATE APPROVED: November 6, 2000 TYPE OF ACTION(S): Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Permit X] Variance Permit WHARF SIT /;-- _ , fir•,,:f , ' / • ,-. 1 , [. K N N Y D A . _,' h. 33RD 4; - 1// A Ufi 1 ' 11 • zi SLIP Q -i'` 4,5:, l/ l0 11 la I . j/ir .' 1 1 T JOB • a • ,aA .1 t,; :6 1, • ' A,rr T E Zrip a s yp n r q I LI 1.1.6 t 5 16 17 7 p AIe N. 3(ST ziosioread.25-1WIA :.pi . E .61,1110 z oit,i Z ii Co,iem sir 1 N=\ u 3 I, N. 30TH Nit10111$ 111. 1 POSIIII--,-- Viglitligi2"- » Q 1iJ , t® 9: mi I' S' . ` 7I 12 1] d •• L14. us a I shsubdev City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 2of3 Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted a permit: This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: Laurie Baker& Lowell Anderson PROJECT: Baker/Anderson Residential Dock & Bulkhead DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION:The applicants, Lowell Anderson and Laurie Baker, are proposing the construction of a 749 square foot dock for use by a single family residence located on the Lake Washington shoreline. Included with the proposal is the removal of an existing concrete bulkhead and its replacement with an enhanced vegetated shoreline. The dock is proposed at a length of 105 feet and would be constructed of pressure treated Douglas- fir decking. The shoreward 65 feet of the pier would be 6 feet wide, leading to an 8.5-foot long, 8-foot wide intervening section, ending with a 35-foot long section of 8 feet in width. The construction of the dock would involve the removal of sixteen 12-inch creosote piles that remain from the previously existing failed pier. Twelve 4-inch coated steel piles, set at 18-foot intervals, would be driven to support the new dock. The project would include the installation of prisms in order to minimize shading in the area of the dock with the greatest amount of surface coverage. Equipment necessary for project construction would be brought to the site via barge, including a barge-mounted crane and vibratory pile driver. The subject site is designated as an "urban" environment under the City's Shoreline Master Program. Private single family piers and docks are permitted within this designation provided there is no more than one pier per developed water front lot or ownership and the dock design complies with established specifications. These standards limit dock length to 80 feet, width to 8 feet, require a minimum setback of 5 feet from adjacent property lines, and allow no more than one pier extension at a maximum of 100 square feet in size. Residential docks and bulkheads are typically exempt from the requirements for a shoreline substantial development permit. However, the applicant is seeking approval of a shoreline variance from section 4-3-090.L.e.ii of the City's Shoreline Master Program in order to exceed the maximum permitted dock length of 80 feet. With the exception of the subject variance request, the proposed residential dock and bulkhead comply with all pertinent shoreline development regulations. A Exemption Certificate from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be issued for the bulkhead portion of the project. In May of 1999, the proposal was brought before the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), where a decision was tabled pending the applicant's submittal of a Biological Assessment addressing the project's potential affect on critical habitat of Puget Sound chinook salmon. In response to this request, the applicant submitted a biological assessment and substantially revised the scale of the proposed dock by reducing overall size, length and width dimensions. The ERC took potential impacts to shoreline, wildlife, and habitat into consideration and subsequently issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)for the project. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 54-55, Block A, Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden SEC-TWNP-R:31-24N-5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF:Lake Washington APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 4-3-090.J Urban Environment page 3-25 4-3-090.L Specific Use Regulations page 3-27 4-3-090.L.2 Piers and Docks page 3-32 4-9-190.1 Shoreline Variances and Conditional Uses page 9-54 shsubdev City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 3 of 3 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1.The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. 2.The public sewer main located in Lake Washington adjacent to this site shall be properly located and protected prior to the start of construction. The contractor is to notify the Renton Maintenance Division 425-235-2585) prior to starting work in the lake to schedule an on-site preconstruction meeting. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1.The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2.This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3.A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. c( ati Fred Kaufman, aring Ex miner Date THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: August 9, 2000 APPROVED:November 6, 2000 DENIED: N/A If Variance, Section(s)of the City's Shoreline Master Program being varied: RMC section 4-3-090.L.2.e.ii. This Variance permit is approved by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: Neil Watts, Director DATE Development Services Division cc: Attorney General's Office Applicant shsubdev CAISIING PILR 1530 SO FT Or DOCK COVERAGE _ II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I o V lMVU1.11G.11.UYU•II ' 3111 MOUNT,Vi[w AVE N I i Z ; / mil 111111111111I111111111I11 2060 SO FT)I IK 0 W1- r o NON NI IL IN:C LINI PIN MAW SUNVIY IIWI RAMI• -wooD PICKET ICNCL 37Z 3f5Is9J2g.- B9• 0•-51 I..—-._-- I 43 _N•5•MIN 67•-6- I85.54• 40 Z Q I• e, 1 . E%ISIING E%ISisirVYI% r———. lO'w1LlOw Y IquSC Ll31'REwOSCO PICK 67 f0 OC JOB SITE 560 son lJJ L__———J REMOVED Q 40•-6'--/ C 311,7 MOUNT VIEW AVE NYM1 60' 11 LOT 11.940 SO 17) I!I .105' I1.°' TEMPORARY SILT/ENCC, E WY,1 ,- PROPOSED O.H,W,M, o > 011W,M, 21.85•Al• ElISTING CONCRETE — 1.BVIHEAU I86.77' — ZIEXIST:I %11.85 N 89•-50'-57 E 0SEAPLANER AO-POP)AR DECK AND WALII llllllllllllllllllllllll. I TC 11760 SO fl Of DOCK COIERAGL e I BO SZiTr NN CAHOPr O MORGAN.IAVRA 990 SO FT) IJ C%ISNNG PIERK. '3103 MOUNT.VIEW AVE N I 33 I SITE PLAN 1 I SCALE. 1 P- 20• ICONSTRUCTNEWPIERIA•% I05.OVER-µl. PIER MI BE A 6•WIDE WµKWAT WIDENING TO B•AND , MAKINGARING A JOG TO THS SOUTH,WITH TOTALOVER WATER COVERAGE Or 749 SO ET. N 1 KEY 4 R- I PROPOSED STRUCTURES EXISTING VEGETATION TO BESur '/ aV I f REMOVED: Y. I. MORNING GLORY,BUTTERCUP. V r.f in t.I•, BULLRUSH.AND NON-NATIVE IRIS) k. . K NNY15T. 3. LIP OL\C; • K:, ° « ;.. . i i LEGAL DESCRIPTION Q TO • f 5 w.=; i o .N. 32ND 1/4 SA SE 31-2CRI 3a6 o•1f A u'.iia TA%l01 /: 334710 3880 S ICE t OAK A LOT 54-55 HILLWNS LN WN r — GARDEN Or EDEN/1 k SH LDS ADJ TIT 14)I,• o i N.N. 315T 3 i 'LI Colem a•. ul: Ar-3r-1o' l • s r/ N. DOTNII LONG: 122•-12•_3B• III 5 iI .Q' . e Jin rCCIR; W 7 t f dr.il jai w:. AL2 VICINITY MAP 81 a SONS: I-200' o S E E a t 1j I KEYl032' wLBOAi O CKISRNG 10't CREOSOTE I TREATED THUS TO BE RCu0vE0(16 TOTAL) s PROPOSED 1'SCH, e0 COATED STEEL RIDS'PALING(12 TOTAL AT le'! o/c) 37'-6' T 6' r el o a REFERENCE 2K6 PDESSI/R( IDEATED I L 6 n R LINE O O DE DECKING IIISNINNun NORTH jAlREFERENCEji I( LINE 6 e O J 1 O.H.WU AT 25. PROPOSEDCOATED_PROPOSEDSTECL PILING 0 O BULKHEAD z YE I t SOUTH PRISMS FOR APPROKIMATE LOCATION o i S OF SEWER LINEo NERENCE _ LIGHT PENETRATION PLAN VIEW f: f SCALE: I/1'.1' SOUTH 11 nltall; CONSTRUCT NEW PIER 14' K 105'OVER-ALL.SOUTHREFERENCEPIERWILLCONSISTOFA6'MAINWAI.K,WIDENING LINE 4 RTOANe'WALK AFTER A JOG TO THE 5OU211. I( [' 32'SAILBOAT v O i 5 I 32'SAILBOAT I JY wLBOAf PROPOSED PIER B ONWr iT'KE BOTTOM WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/1'.I' Iv I z C a e . so o : 1iI ; tit I a2 Z i 105' 6' I C la JOIST CAP PILING i4 1 B NAILER I A MIN GLU-LAM \ 37. I I_ _ 1' allaMilifiliiiil 6'l' . I 11 I I 1 I I _ O.H.W.M. AT I' . I '; 8 6 C:CC.ICCIILII:. 'Z= o I o A PROPOSED I[I I[I Il[ o i BULKHEAD B DETAIL VIEW i APPROXIMATE LOCATIONPRISMSFOROFSEWERLINElDLIGHTPENETRATIONCONSTRUCTNEWPIER14' X 105' OVER-ALL. PIER WILL CONSIST OF A 6' MAINWALK, WIDENING D TO AN 8' WALK AFTER A JOG TO THE SOUTH. KEY o EXISTING 10"f CREOSOTE APPROXIMATE POSITION TREATED PILES TO BE REMOVED (16 TOTAL)80' PIER LIMIT LINE OF KEEL DOCKED O.H.W. i AT 80' PIER 21.85' I i I O.L.W.U . i/; /, , \/\i\y\ N V16.-6" 4 i\\%/ \\•\ -''/'\ \,` `' ELEVATION VIEW iPROPOSED SECTION C-C1-- -18'± PILING ALL NEW PILING TO BE 4" SCH 80 COATED STEEL SPANNING 18't ANDDRIVENAT10,000 LBS OR PRACTICAL REFUSAL. 80' PIER LIMIT LINE O.H.W. I 21.85' I 7'-2" O.L.W. i y /, ../ /%/,r// /\//\/\//\/\/\/\/\./\ \ \ \ \\\ \\\ \/\\ j\,----' \\\\\\\\ .--jam\%i%%\\\/\\:\ \/\\K\/\, /i./i. //i,/ SCALE: 1"=16' i.\,\\/\/.\/,\/.\//\/// PROPOSED•CONSTRUCT NEW PIER. REPLACE EXISTING BULKHEAD.1 SECTION D- D IN:LAKE WASHINGTON AT:RENTON, WA. APPLICANT:LOWELL ANDERSON 3107 MOUNT VIEW AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 PAGE:3 OF:8 DATE:6—1 —00 OHN Sit T FENCE 21 115' POST ATTACH SILT N.W. FENCE TO TOP 21.85' OF POST O I p6.'III CZ71 ILy`' 8 d12lvE L06i { p A N ROCK od JI2t _, v IerAm•GV6,12,1v .. POST ANCHOR o.G 'W WEIGHTS O BOTTOLA 7, j\/ yj\//\//\//\ >//\/j\/\" \//\//\,I/ 1 9TTOu I 6'ITTOO 8' 0SKI, 61 V vuy vdTl01-1 SILT FENCE INSTALLATION DETAIL LVo1P' / 2 We SCALE I'w3' INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. y/ // rr{./ COMPLETEDREMOVE ?FENCE MIEN PROJECT 5 STIL FAH L V THI L l ' /PI So kg PENOJE CXK I i I FIG t_¢L"m±' 'FE14c' LIFE guLzA51D To/11„ ,, r ` w,,c° LtteuE bwcTIJ eemn-1u-1 1,,,I 1 il NI P,oP.' v,,m, I .,r i \ 1 11' 11 III+II sitiu_ At.A d ia•• {G 1" El- rVc.Pl(FIK GT2CA-1"D Be co xn aoyv3 f 1" e 1 o STD DE,T4I L A-A Ida kidd1k o Ii\. ToFLixN w/IAti 1J c¢eaihlbReUlleIi1 TeM IN.ILpli f' Dock. Wrn-Iit.l cle6t,E.D 1 ati„ U1evt;L 44 II 16.a REBtoRr!,aOlz I10-IV be,rag -0 i'± 46 saowi.1 hPEGD. u. I OIIWM ?.118 hl:T BRIG C h i 4!i W- l l wnallr.. II e;Ilse w/V Ile ' tbices1b rb¢eL1 . tzca t' I II 61,1 R' C I SI-b12ELIQE, D 4,11,-W pldLlTll $- V•-• 4TEtarel3e,6.e&vSL Ewa 69Jc.guLlzam4D E Ar E c 11 L -V'fop of W 6lJD FxIcT 17 1'F,To 1 )6XG' ILL b RENovr.p GIRGI.17 d12EaC 7 Leeve. e>nyT orzes —y! txly('feE GI•Iwh1.21•¢1 r k— z.s'i n skl p202 IMP 15.11-5 -t'..61 W a ter I-b2ZL1}, Ea II,C P) oo A- ter-•• L•_...,_:,._•..ara---nr-+ W W 1F7rTir. og. u 8 sr e.a-rai,,s W ms , . .it-ram.. g rya a a 33 J._Alt 4virst, 1PPI• J . ' 11 0 R-ef --- INI--_- Mir '' &IL riiM ,i3I1 LS SI - IN NI zi 1- li, Alm 1-2.- 10_,f4 AIMmilnallaummum A 1 ( i :A — 1 _ _:::)_ 6cilia, ni 35 li 1 .I R" ---i R- • 42 a 0_,,,,iiiiIIlinbao-rilLk-- to iso i i3tis--piza :ie. ki-8 i OlLt13' 1 ' i 11'iLs i` t A IMEL-8 R-O. 41 11711g i . EIII3E11 1 Isari Cpig hildu L i4 rrIL 1 i C C r 2 11E 1-R-10 cc , t3E. - 1 , ! R 6 cc f tiumi I , t1, P f de EReR i4 JliWi11R.$ W 1 1_,1111_11. _l ! ! I ' r ---FR V.-- a—8 r_____T___,i EPP _ t R IL 8 I 7-=-. -.__ 04,4.1_ R-1NitaN C3 4 ti1)'Mr . m°'' 31 T24N R5E E 1/2 r CITY )JF RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman CITY OF RENTONNovember30, 2000 NOV 3 0 2000 RECEIVEDLowellAndersonCITYCLERK'S OFFICE 3710 Mt. View Ave N Renton,WA 98056 RE Baker/Anderson Dock LUA99-049,SM,V-H,ECF Dear Mr. Anderson: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the above referenced matter, which was issued on November 6,2000,was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the Development Services Division for further processing with the State. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:jt cc: Sandi Seeger, Development Services Marilyn Petersen,City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 (425)430-6515 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer It 0 co CITY )F RENTON Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman November 30, 2000 Lowell Anderson 3710 Mt.View Ave N Renton, WA 98056 RE: Baker/Anderson Dock LUA99-049,S M,V-H,ECF Dear Mr. Anderson: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the above referenced matter,which was issued on November 6,2000,was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore this matter is considered final by this office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the Development Services Division for further processing with the State. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK:jt cc: Sandi Seeger, Development Services Marilyn Petersen,City Clerk 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6515 a7 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King Joan Thompson being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 6th day of November ,2000, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: Z'" SUBSC.2IO ;vlvitrNN )SWORN to before me this day of N f...,vv 2000. O, O ' Not Public in and for the State of Washington, Qv '`; a' - residing at &,04-1"(C_ , therein. Application;Petition, or Case No.: Anderson/Baker Dock LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT November 6,2000 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Laurie Baker&Lowell Anderson Anderson/Baker Residential Dock and Bulkhead File No.: LUA-99-049.SV,ECF,SME LOCATION: 3107 Mountain View Ave N SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant is requesting a shoreline variance in order to exceed the maximum permitted length for residential docks SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on October 10,2000. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the October 17,2000 hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,October 17,2000,at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Neighborhood Detail Map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site Plan Exhibit No.4: Dock Details and West Elevation Exhibit No. 5: North and South Elevations Exhibit No.6: Details for Shoreline Restoration Exhibit No.7: Aerial photo Exhibit No.8: Top View of Sandbar Navigation Route The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by LESLIE NISHIHIRA, Project Manager, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The subject site is accessed from the east and on the west has 60 feet of shoreline along Lake Washington. The site is located within the R-8 zoning designation and is currently developed with a single family home. The applicant is proposing the construction of a 749 square-foot dock for use by the single family residence. The dock is Laurie Baker&Lowell Andersc,.. Anderson/Baker Residential Dock and Bulkhead File No.: LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME November 6,2000 Page 2 proposed at a length of 105 feet,and would be constructed of pressure treated Douglas fir decking. The first 65 feet of the dock from the shoreline would have a width of six feet. The dock would then transition into a"dog leg" length of 8-1/2 feet with a width of eight feet,and would terminate with a 35-foot long section,also eight feet in width. Construction of the dock would require the removal of sixteen 12-inch creosote piles which remain from the previously failed pier. The construction of the dock would require the installation of twelve 4- inch coated steel piles set at 18 foot intervals. The subject site is designated as an Urban Environment under the City's Shoreline Master Program. Private single family piers and docks are permitted subject to specific development standards,those being a maximum length of 80 feet,a maximum width of eight feet,and a minimum five-foot setback from adjacent property lines. The applicant is requesting a variance in order to exceed that maximum 80 foot length by 25 feet, for a total dock length of 105 feet. With the exception of the subject variance request,the dock meets all other specified development standards of the City's Shoreline Master Program. On September 12 of this year,the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)took potential impacts to wildlife and shoreline habitat into consideration and subsequently issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the project. This determination was followed by a two-week appeal period during which no appeals were filed. Representatives from various City departments have had the opportunity to review and comment on the proposal. These comments are included in the official file and have been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report. The applicant has requested a variance from a provision of the City's Shoreline Master Program which states, "The dock may extend to a maximum of 80 feet beyond the ordinary high water line into the water,or until a depth of 12 feet below the mean low water mark,whichever is reached first." As previously stated,the applicant is seeking an increased dock length of 105 feet,which is 25 feet beyond the maximum 80 foot length permitted. The applicant contends that lake bottom contours at the subject site are such that at the required 80 foot length,water depths would be too shallow to safely moor a boat. The approval of the variance would allow the applicant to construct a dock to allow a sufficient water depth so that safe boat moorage is possible. Ms.Nishihira reviewed the Variance Decision Criteria that the Examiner must consider,and explained how the dock will meet these criteria. The applicant contends that lake bottom contours are such that a dock constructed at the 80 foot maximum length would preclude the ability to safely moor a boat The Examiner questioned whether a longer dock would need to be constructed if the applicant purchases a larger boat in the future, since the hardship seems to be based on the size of the boat. He also questioned whether the boat would be directly on the property line even though the pier has to be set back five feet from the property line. Ms.Nishihira stated that she could not speak to the applicant's intentions of purchasing a larger boat in the future. The regulations specify that only the dock itself maintain a five-foot setback from the property line. The reason for the "dog leg"transition is to keep the boat on the owner's side of the property line when docked. The applicant has provided a list of adjacent docks in the area. Of the seven docks listed,which range from 40 feet to 175 feet in length,four exceed the maximum 80-foot length permitted. The average length of the seven docks in the area is 112 feet,which exceeds the 105-foot length proposed by the applicant. The proposed dock is not anticipated to be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shoreline in the same vicinity. The proposal would not result in the blocking of views and would not impede the availability of public access to the shoreline. The intent of the Shoreline Master Program is to allow for flexibility in dock design in order to accommodate shallow water depths at unique sites. The approval of the variance would not conflict with the general purpose of the Shoreline Master Program. The approval of the variance would not inflict harm to the area and would not infringe on public welfare and interest. The hardship presented by the Laurie Baker&Lowell Andersc,.. Anderson/Baker Residential Dock and Bulkhead File No.: LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME November 6,2000 Page 3 applicant is directly related to natural features unique to the subject property. There are a number of existing docks in the immediate area which are substantially longer than the design proposed by the applicant. As determined by the ERC,the proposed dock and shoreline enhancement project would not cause adverse impacts to the shoreline environment. The approval of the variance would not result in a detrimental effect to the public interest nor adversely affect public rights of navigation. Staff recommends approval of the requested Shoreline Variance for the Anderson/Baker residential dock and bulkhead. Elizabeth Petras, Waterfront Construction,205 NE Northlake Way, Seattle,WA 98105,reviewed the applicant's proposal and explained the reasons for the chosen design of the dock,including water depths in the area and safe moorage of the boat during winter storms. Guidelines set out by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife as well as the National Marine Fishery Service have been followed in regard to dock widths as well as installation of prisms under the dock. The proposal includes a shoreline enhancement that will bring a number of native plants back into the area and work toward the environmental goal of a properly functioning condition of the shoreline ecology. Lowell Anderson,3107 Mt.View Ave N,Renton,WA 98056,stated that the dock has been designed to accommodate a boat up to 32 feet. A larger boat would require a larger pier in order safely moor the boat in terms of egress and ingress. However,the draft for larger boats doesn't change other than getting smaller. A 60- foot boat could still maintain a draft of six feet. Mr.Anderson stated that it is not his intent nor desire to have a boat larger than 32 feet moored in the location. Lloyd Lindburg,3111 Mt.View Ave N,Renton,WA 98056,stated that he lives next door to the Anderson property. He expressed concerns about the old fence line being used as the survey line. The survey line is four feet south of the fence. This four feet is included in his 65 feet of property. He feels that the length of the other docks in the area is not relevant,since the property is in a small cove area and one of the docks mentioned is a commercial dock that was made for hydroplane racing years ago. He further stated that the dock should not be allowed to go out farther than the existing piling that will be removed. All the docks in the area are of a reasonable length. A 105-foot dock will be an eyesore,and will impede the fisherman in the area. He stated that because the offset is not large enough,the access to his launching ramp will also be impeded. Ms.Nishihira responded by stating that the applicant has presented a 60-foot lot width and proposed work within his property lines. He is not showing any work to be proposed outside of that property line. He is not contending that the property line extends to the fence line. That is a civil matter that must be resolved outside of this proposal. The Examiner asked for clarification on whether the boat would extend across the property line when it is docked and intrude into the lot to the north. Ms. Petras responded that the property line would be very close when the boat is docked. The drawing was done based on a typical beam for a 32-foot sailboat. It was determined that the boat would be right on the property line,but not extend beyond it. The structure itself does adhere to the Renton guidelines concerning being at lest five feet away from the adjacent property line. The rules are for the structure,not for the boat itself. The Examiner advised Mr. Lindburg that property line disputes are outside the boundaries of this forum to decide, and suggested he seek guidance from an attorney. Mr.Anderson reviewed the aerial photograph the area showing the sandbar in relation to the existing docks and explained that is necessary to extend the dock in order to clear the sandbar safely. He understands that there is a property line dispute involving his property and Mr.Lindburg's. This is something that will need to be resolved. Laurie Baker&Lowell Andersc,.. Anderson/Baker Residential Dock and Bulkhead File No.: LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME November 6,2000 Page 4 If it is resolved so that the fence line becomes the new property line,he would like to have this project include the new property line. If it cannot be resolved,he will stop at the platted line and address the difference at a later time. Mr.Lindburg restated some of his concerns about the project. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:45 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1.The applicants,Laurie Baker and Lowell Anderson,filed a request for approval of a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit and a Variance from the Shoreline Management Act to construct a 105 foot long pier or dock into Lake Washington. 2.The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3.The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)for the subject proposal. 4.The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5.The subject site is located 3107 Mountain View Avenue North. 6.The subject site is located on the shoreline of Lake Washington. The site is located west of Lake Washington Boulevard and north of NE 31th Street(as extended). 7.The subject site consists of a lot that contains uplands and submerged property below the surface of the lake. An existing home is located on the site. 8.The applicants propose constructing a 105 foot long,approximately 749 square foot pier. In addition, the applicants propose removing a concrete bulkhead and restoring natural contours and vegetation to the shoreline. 9.The construction will remove 16, 12-inch creosoted wood pilings from a previous pier. The new pier would be supported by 12,4-inch coated steel pilings. The new pier would extend directly out from the shore for approximately 68 feet,then jog slightly to the south approximately 14 feet and extend out into the lake another approximately 40 feet. The initial 68 feet of pier would be approximately 6 feet wide. The most distant 40 feet of pier would be approximately 8 feet wide. 10. The southward jog is intended to provide clearance for a boat to be moored along the north side of the pier and not intrude into the waters of the neighboring property to the north. 11. The dock would include prisms that would allow for light passage to the water underneath the dock. Laurie Baker&Lowell Andersc,.. Anderson/Baker Residential Dock and Bulkhead File No.: LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME November 6,2000 Page 5 12. The water depth in this area is shallow. There is sediment layer that runs in a northwesterly direction that creates the shallows. The code allows piers 80 feet long or until water depth is 12 feet deep, whichever comes first. At 80 feet water depth on the south side of the pier varies from approximately 4 feet 3 inches(Ordinary High Water Line-OHWL)to 2 feet,3 inches(Ordinary Low Water Line- OLWL)whereas there is between 9 feet, 5 inches and 7 feet, 5 inches of water depth on the north side. In order to achieve a navigable water depth of 12 feet and provide safe moorage for a longer sailboat, the applicant seeks the 105 foot,offset length proposed. 13. Other piers or docks in the area vary from between approximately 40 feet to 175 feet. Apparently, four in the area exceed the proposed 105 feet. Neighboring to the north is a pier and boathouse structure out over the lake. 14. This area along the lake is designated an urban shoreline environment. 15. The applicant has proposed a master development plan to control erosion and avoid disturbing the lake environment. This plan was reviewed and accepted by the ERC. 16. The applicants apparently have been involved in a dispute regarding the location of the property line between their parcel and the parcel to the north. The plans for the pier supposedly work to avoid intrusions into the disputed property. CONCLUSIONS: 1.The Variance provisions of the Shoreline Master Program permit a variance in certain circumstances. The criteria are that: Upon proper application,a substantial development permit may be granted which is at variance with the criteria established in the Renton Master Program where,owing to special conditions pertaining to the specific piece of property,the literal interpretation and strict application of the criteria established in the Renton Master Program would cause undue and unnecessary hardship or practical difficulties. The fact that the applicant might make a greater profit by using his property in a manner contrary to the intent of the Master Program is not by itself sufficient reason for a variance.The Land Use Hearing Examiner must find each of the following: a.Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property,or to the intended use thereof,that do not apply generally to other properties on the shoreline in the same vicinity. b.The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shorelines in the same vicinity. c.The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shorelines in the same vicinity. d.The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. Laurie Baker&Lowell Anders Anderson/Baker Residential Dock and Bulkhead File No.: LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME November 6,2000 Page 6 e.The public welfare and interest will be preserved; if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it,the variance will be denied,but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971,and the provisions of this Master Program. 2.The depth of Lake Washington in this area is fairly shallow. It varies somewhat but can be as shallow as 2 to 4 feet or perhaps nearly 9 feet. This significantly limited the type of boat and size of boat that may be docked. At eighty feet from shore the water depth is limited and allowing a longer pier does permit reasonable use of boating privileges for lake side owners. This is a unique aspect of the area in which the subject site lies. 3.In order to make use of the water-side nature of the site and to allow use of even a moderate sized boat, a variance that permits a pier of greater than the usual 80 foot length is necessary. A longer pier is necessary in order to reach water that is 12 feet in depth. This fact explains the other longer piers in this and other areas along the shoreline. 4.There had been an older pier in this area. The new pier will allow the removal of more and larger support pilings with fewer narrow pilings. There are other piers and similar longer piers already serving homeowners along this section of the lake. Therefore,approval will not be unnecessarily detrimental to either the public welfare or other properties in this area. 5.The Master Program makes allowances for single family homes along the lakeshore. Homeownership on a lake encourages water use and piers would be considered normal accessory uses. The pier is in harmony with the purposes of the program. 6.The pier should have minimal impact although any structure built out into the lake has to have some impacts. The design should reduce them as much as possible. 7.In addition to the criteria noted above,the proposal must also satisfy the variance criteria contained in WAC 173-27-170.3,as follows: i.That the strict application of the bulk,dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable master program precludes all reasonable use of the property; ii.That the hardship described above is specifically related to the property,and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size,or natural features and the application of the master program,and not,for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions; iii. That the design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program and will not cause adverse impacts to the shoreline environment; iv. That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area;that the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford relief; v.That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect;and, vi.That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be adversely affected. Laurie Baker&Lowell Andersc.. Anderson/Baker Residential Dock and Bulkhead File No.: LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME November 6,2000 Page 7 8.It is nearly impossible to confirm that denying the variance would deprive the applicants of all reasonable use of the site,but it would deprive then of useful access to the lake for boating. 9.The existing depth off the shoreline is shallow,and this is unique to this area of the lakeshore. 10. The project is designed to present a narrow but useable dock width and to allow the passage of light through a prism system,thereby increasing the natural light that penetrates under the dock. The addition of one more dock along this portion of lakeshore will not create any untoward impacts on the shoreline environment. 11. As noted above,there are other docks along this portion of the shore and there are both longer and shorter docks to provide access to deeper water. 12. The approval of the variance should not create any detrimental impacts to the general public. 13. The pier will intrude into the lake but being one in an existing series,navigable shallow water craft already need to steer off the shoreline in this area. RECOMMENDATION: The Variance from the Shoreline Management Program is approved subject to the following conditions: 1.The applicant shall comply with all construction conditions by the State agencies and all construction conditions provided in the application and modifications submitted to the City. ORDERED THIS 6th day of November,2000. FRED J.KAUF HEARING EXA ER TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of November,2000 to the parties of record: Leslie Nishihira Lowell Anderson 1055 S Grady Way 3107 Mt.Vernon Ave N Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98056 Elizabeth Petras Lloyd Lindburg Waterfront Construction 3111 Mt. Vernon Ave N 205 NE Northlake Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98105 Laurie Baker&Lowell Anders Anderson/Baker Residential Dock and Bulkhead File No.: LUA-99-049,SV,ECF,SME November 6,2000 Page 8 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of November, 2000 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Members, Renton Planning Commission Neil Watts,Development Services Director Larry Rude,Fire Marshal Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev.Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Betty Nokes,Economic Development Director Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 100G of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., November 20,2000. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 110,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. Y. . e.1:77.-! : 3 ; rog-v----- , aliel,; . t!WHAR-F SIT /a aliiipT• `?.- .-- . •', i .tEriA , . i • mum . • ilig .1 - irl . • e . . - `-' i''** SLIP 4.,,.A"...._•..*,t..O' it7f-s 4.I. orIi.: I/ i N-E 3 JF i. 3t, ) ..... . ../ 1•k 1/ N.co 32ND - i MR ' •":,.. 4• JOB 8 31A. 11 - 0 SITE ./z - 3ie1- o- 3 1 1 1 • i,; 7 T T-------- -itr-'---'-- i.0 0 rnirie I f.- • . N. 3IST ir will 1...v........ i : 0 rail 81 IN1TM . rani I. - Cole::110Wor, 1): 04. 70 '•• 0111M.'71 • . 91 iell , 1 T 4 • IT 9111001 Ai _A.. I°• IL 13 ;4 I 1".;5-; • ir- 45'. III 4-4 1 IL. EXISTING PIER I5J0 SO(1 or DOCK COVCRACC — IIdlllllllllli°°""""""""""""""'L_ 11.'I I U LINUUI.RG.1.1 UYU I I a I 3111 MOUNT VIEW AVE N N-' / L_I 2060 SO IT)I Z 0 •• f ,. CK o O r . OJ CD NOR NI((NC( UNL PI),WLUU SURVEY NUAI RAMP /-WOOD PICKET ICNCE 393. :.= 89' D'-57 I. `— •---_."_•._Z I 5'MIN 67'-6" SI-J- 185.54' 9' tl E EXISTING IS11NG Y HOUS( Li r L_'___ JD WILLOW JOB SITE8• IRUPOSCO PICK 6'L- TO 01 1,560 SO R QiREMOVED 3107 MOUNT VIEW AVE NW 60' i0'-6. 1' i LO7 11,940 SO FT) I u105' t i wI/_'''b TEMPORARY SILT FENCE iYYI i -PROPOSED 0.H w M. • 2'-T• 071.W.M. 21.85'AT iRIOTINGCONCRETE ;A, IB6.27' Z IH, 11 BULHUD I EXISTING Ai2.85 N 89'-50'-57 E QSEAPUNERnKO"POPUR 1DECKANDWALKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 x yI 1260 SO fl or DOCK COAERRCT i I0i B0 -UfT W17M CANOPY • • O MORG3103 M,LAURA 990 SO R) WRp EXISTING PIER J 103 MOUNT.NEW AVE N I 3 4 I R I SITE PLAN SCALE: 1'.20' ICONSTRUCTNEWPIERIA'X 105'OVER-ALL. PIER WILL BC A 6'WIDE WALKWAY WIDENING TO 8'AND A. MAKING A JOG 10 THE,SOUTH,WITH TOTAL OVER WATER COVERAGE 0( 749 SO IT. 2 r_:=0_ KEY R P cr` __ PROPOSED STRUCTURES f llr -r y EXISTING VEGETATION 10 BE f f REMOVED: I MORNING GLORY,BUTTERCUP, Y_."-` ? 1 r BULLRUSH,AND NON-NATIVE IRIS) LI dt. w.av ; riP^evI' $ 1 ,fir` 'NiIca e SLIP b,I a "T"" EGAL DESCRIPTION 1-Al . aX7••, ? I [C SE SI-ITN-05E T o n 52N0 JOB w `• TARIM 334210 3880 c/' `; 1,(a ' 1 t BLK A LOT 54-55 HILLMANS LK WN SIZE / IS VL ii GARDEN Of EDEN C'1 h SH LOS ADJ wID! Y 4 IInEi1!1' t CDl0 ,' .: ./... 021010,rilA " tilirlaill: ,7! em I l LONG: 122'-12'-3B' W a• ;• N. SOIN o ill: 1 Ii U VICINITY MAP SCALE: I.-200' i2 105' 6 I: C to JOIST CAP PILING k A 37'-_ B NAILER C I A MIN GLU-LAM I Ir r,1-- -- --, nT 1 I-IT-1l1 r - 6' I ': F. JLLU_L.LLLIJ_a 1 _O.H.W.M. AT I A PROPOSEDn ' 8' r n-I-I TITn o I o BULKHEAD I i - - B DETAIL VIEW I APPROXIMATE LOCATION PRISMS FOR OF SEWER LINE D LIGHT PENETRATION CONSTRUCT NEW PIER 14' X 105' OVER-ALL. PIER WILL CONSIST OF A 6' MAINWALK, WIDENING D d4 TO AN 8' WALK AFTER A JOG TO THE SOUTH. KEY 0 EXISTING 10"t CREOSOTE APPROXIMATE POSITION TREATED PILES TO BE REMOVED (16 TOTAL) 80' PIER LIMIT LINE OF KEEL DOCKED O.H.W. I AT 80' PIER 21.85' I I I j / / /\i /\ ./16'-6" s/ ELEVATION VIEW, /\;;\ I/i/ .// j PROPOSED SECTION C—CPILINGt18't ALL NEW PILING TO BE 4" SCH 80 COATED STEEL SPANNING 18't AND DRIVEN AT 10,000 LBS OR PRACTICAL REFUSAL. 80' PIER LIMIT LINE O.H.W. I Y- \///\//\//\//\/%/ //%///\\/\\/,, r \//,\//j\/j\//" /„/\/\\.\.. SCALE: 1"=16' f\/j\//\/\//\/j` /,%i.PROPOSED:CONSTRUCT NEW PIER. REPLACE EXISTING BULKHEAD. I SECTION D— D IN:LAKE WASHINGTON I AT:RENTON, WA, APPLICANT:LOWELL ANDERSON 3107 MOUNT VIEW AVE N RENTON, WA. 98056 PAGE:3 OF:8 DATE:6-1 -00 r City of Renton PUBLIC Department of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: October 17, 2000 Project Name: Baker/Anderson Residential Dock and Bulkhead Applicant/Address:Laurie Baker& Lowell Anderson 3107 Mountain View Avenue North Renton, WA 98056 Owner/Address: Same as applicant File Number:LUA-99-049, SV, ECF, SME Project Manager: Lesley Nishihira Project Description:The applicant is requesting a shoreline variance in order to exceed the maximum permitted length for residential docks. The proposal includes the construction of a 749 square foot private dock for use by an existing single-family residence located on the Lake Washington shoreline. Included is the removal of the existing failing concrete bulkhead and its replacement with a vegetative, shoreline-enhancing bulkhead. Project Location: 3107 Mountain View Avenue North WHARFv 2f::•-3—, ' F:. rw- r:,L2 ; :0 t:SIT __ _, , .f l.` K N N Y D a A 3R3D Alta ,2&4..... /, i _ 4 .) . .t_.....1.4„ , q5/—,S'1 SLIP Q or?o l' . 1oill a 1s 1 - 1CD ' N. . 32ND T JOB • a • j;,7j1 .. ` iB I .Sri 0 S\-VE Ufi a• , 13 'Id 1S 16 17 T j lam 3 1_' N. 3IST cc El!:4D I Al 11 Z • r fili 13 14 15 16 i// d 3 N. 30TH itellotook . ,.. -.. -6a7o-.:. - D Vaillilltili r .71 z® 9Z s/ T . 41,--1,0004,. .7 7.2...., IZI3 ;4T 1 City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner BAKER/ANDERSON RESIDENTIAL DOCK&BULKHEAD LUA-99-049, SV,ECF,SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:OCTOBER 17, 2000 Page 2 of 6 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1.Owner of Record: Laurie Baker& Lowell Anderson 3107 Mountain View Avenue North Renton,WA 98056 2.Zoning Designation: Residential—8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) 3.Comprehensive Plan Residential Single Family(RSF) Land Use Designation: 4.Existing Site Use: Single family dwelling 5.Neighborhood Characteristics North: Single family residential East: Mountain View Avenue North, Single family residential South: Single family residential West: Lake Washington 6.Access: Mountain View Avenue North 7.Site Area: 10,800 square feet 8.Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: 990 sf Existing residence New Building Area: 749 sf Proposed dock Total Building Area: 1,739 sf C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No.Ordinance No.Date Zoning N/A 4404 06/07/93 Comprehensive Plan N/A 4498 02/20/95 Annexation N/A 1804 12/08/59 D. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Shoreline Master Program Regulations(RMC 4-3-090) 2. Property Development Standards (RMC 4-4) a. Development Guidelines and Regulations—General (RMC 4-4-030) b. Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Regulations (RMC 4-4-130) 3. Shoreline Permits (RMC 4-9-190) E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element 2. Environmental Element F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM: 1. Urban Environment(4-3-090.J) 2. Specific Use Regulations (4-3-090.L) 3. Piers and Docks (4-3-090.L.12) 4. Shoreline Variances and Conditional Uses (4-9-190.1) Hexreport City of Renton P/B/PW Departmern Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner BAKER/ANDERSON RESIDENTIAL DOCK&BULKHEAD LUA-99-049, SV, ECF, SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:OCTOBER 17, 2000 Page 3 of 6 G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicants, Lowell Anderson and Laurie Baker, are proposing the construction of a 749 square foot dock for use by a single family residence located on the Lake Washington shoreline. Included with the proposal is the removal of an existing concrete bulkhead and its replacement with an enhanced vegetated shoreline. The dock is proposed at a length of 105 feet and would be constructed of pressure treated Douglas-fir decking. The shoreward 65 feet of the pier would be 6 feet wide, leading to an 8.5-foot long, 8-foot wide intervening section, ending with a 35-foot long section of 8 feet in width. The construction of the dock would involve the removal of sixteen 12-inch creosote piles which remain from the previously existing failed pier. Twelve 4-inch coated steel piles, set at 18-foot intervals,would be driven to support the new dock. The project would include the installation of prisms in order to minimize shading in the area of the dock with the greatest amount of surface coverage. Equipment necessary for project construction would be brought to the site via barge, including a barge-mounted crane and vibratory pile driver. The proposed shoreline enhancement would involve the removal of approximately 22 cubic yards of soil, concrete and non-native vegetation. In addition to the placement of rocks, approximately 40 cubic yards of natural lakeshore material and native plants would be installed. The restored shoreline would meander landward from the current ordinary high water mark. The subject site is designated as an"urban"environment under the City's Shoreline Master Program. Private single family piers and docks are permitted within this designation provided there is no more than one pier per developed water front lot or ownership and the dock design complies with established specifications. These standards limit dock length to 80 feet,width to 8 feet, require a minimum setback of 5 feet from adjacent property lines, and allow no more than one pier extension at a maximum of 100 square feet in size. Residential docks and bulkheads are typically exempt from the requirements for a shoreline substantial development permit. However, the applicant is seeking approval of a shoreline variance from section 4-3- 090.L.e.ii of the City's Shoreline Master Program in order to exceed the maximum permitted dock length of 80 feet. With the exception of the subject variance request, the proposed residential dock and bulkhead comply with all pertinent shoreline development regulations. A Exemption Certificate from the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit will be issued for the bulkhead portion of the project. In May of 1999, the proposal was brought before the Environmental Review Committee (ERC),where a decision was tabled pending the applicant's submittal of a Biological Assessment addressing the project's potential affect on critical habitat of Puget Sound chinook salmon. In response to this request, the applicant submitted a biological assessment and substantially revised the scale of the proposed dock by reducing overall size, length and width dimensions. The ERC took potential impacts to shoreline,wildlife, and habitat into consideration and subsequently issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)for the project. The shoreline variance decision is forwarded to the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General's office for approval or denial. The shoreline decision is deemed to be approved within 30 calendar days from the date of receipt by these agencies unless written communication is received indicating otherwise. Appeals of the shoreline variance decision must be filed to the Shoreline Hearings Board within 30 days of issuance. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA(RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on September 12, 2000, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance(DNS)for the proposal. The SEPA determination was followed by a two-week appeal period, which ended on October 2, 2000. No appeals to the threshold determination were filed. Hexreport City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner BAKER/ANDERSON RESIDENTIAL DOCK&BULKHEAD LUA-99-049,SV,ECF, SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:OCTOBER 17, 2000 Page 4 of 6 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of the proposal, including the Biological Assessment provided by the applicant, did not reveal the need for additional mitigating measures above and beyond adopted code requirements, as well as beyond measures proposed by the applicant. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues from the proposed shoreline variance. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. H. VARIANCE ANALYSIS: 1. VARIANCE DECISION REQUESTED a. The applicant has requested a variance from section 4-3-090.L.e.ii of the Shoreline Master Program Regulations which states: "The dock may extend to a maximum of 80 feet beyond the ordinary high water line into the water or until a depth of 12 feet below the mean low water mark,whichever is reached first." b. The applicant wishes to construct a residential dock of 105 feet in length, which exceeds the maximum 80-foot length permitted by 25 feet. c. Lake bottom contours on the site are such that at the required 80-foot length, the shallow water depth would preclude the applicant's ability to safely moor a boat. d. The variance would allow the applicant to construct the dock to a point of sufficient water depth (e.g., 14 feet, 6 inches minimum)so that sufficient boat moorage is possible. 2. VARIANCE DECISION CRITERIA The Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant variances in the administration of the Renton Shoreline Master Program upon making a determination in writing that the conditions specified below have been found to exist(RMC 4-9-190.1.4). a. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the subject property, or to the intended use thereof, that do not apply generally to other properties on shoreline in the same vicinity. The lake bottom within the immediate proximity of the site is such that water depths are fairly shallow and would preclude the use of an 80-foot dock. The applicant owns a 32-foot sailboat with a 6-foot draft and contends that an increased dock length is necessary in order to properly moor the boat. Water depths deepen in a northwesterly direction at the subject site. Based on the elevations provided by the applicant, at the required 80-foot dock length water depths of 4 feet, 3 inches (OHWL) and 2 feet, 3 inches (OLWL)would be available on the south side of the pier. Water depths of 9 feet, 5 inches (OHWL)and 7 feet, 5 inches (OLWL)would be available on the north side of the pier. These depths are such that the keel would submerge into the bottom of the lake, thereby eliminating the ability to safely moor a boat. In order to reasonably accommodate boat moorage, the applicant has proposed a dock with a"dog leg"design in order to utilize sufficient water depths at the nearest possible distances to the shoreline. A distance between 88 feet and 92 feet beyond the ordinary high water line would achieve the appropriate water depth necessary for the sailboat's keel. An additional 17 feet—for a total of 105 feet from the ordinary high water line—would be necessary to accommodate the length of the sailboat. At the proposed 105-foot length,water depths of 16 feet, 6 inches (OHWL)and 14 feet, 6 inches (OLWL)would be available and would provide adequate depths for boat moorage. However, the south side of the dock would still not be of sufficient depth to accommodate a sailboat with a 6-foot draft, providing water depths of only 8 feet, 9 inches (OHWL)and 6 feet, 9 inches (OLWL). Hexreport City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner BAKER/ANDERSON RESIDENTIAL DOCK 8 BULKHEAD LUA-99-049, SV,ECF, SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:OCTOBER 17,2000 Page 5 of 6 The applicant further contends that the proposed 105-foot dock length, with"dog leg"transition, is the only design that would allow for safe year round moorage. By utilizing the north side of the dock, the sailboat could be safely moored with 4 feet of water beneath the keel at the ordinary low water line. Less than 4 feet would not provide sufficient protection to keep the keel from hitting the lake bottom during winter storms. The requested dock length would provide sufficient water depth for safe boat moorage in both the summer and winter seasons. b. The variance permit is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties on shoreline in the same vicinity. The applicant has provided a list of other properties in the vicinity which currently enjoy the use of private residential docks. Of the 7 docks listed, which range from 40 feet to 175 feet in length, 4 exceed the maximum 80-foot length permitted. In addition, the average length of the seven docks in the area (112 feet)exceeds the 105-foot length proposed by the applicant. c. The variance permit will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shoreline in the same vicinity. The proposed dock is not anticipated to be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property on the shoreline in the same vicinity. The proposal would not result in the blocking of views and would not impede the availability of public access to the shoreline. d. The variance granted will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. The dock length provision is worded such that dock design"may extend a maximum of 80 feet beyond the ordinary high water line into the water or until a depth of 12 feet below the mean low water mark, whichever is reached first." Although the strict interpretation of the provision would prohibit the construction of a dock beyond 80 feet even though water depths of less than 12 feet are present, the intent of the shoreline master program may have been to allow for flexibility in dock design in order to accommodate shallow water depths at unique sites. The approval of the variance would not conflict with the general purpose of the Shoreline Master Program. e. The public welfare and interest will be preserved;if more harm will be done to the area by granting the variance than would be done to the applicant by denying it, the variance will be denied, but each property owner shall be entitled to the reasonable use and development of his lands as long as such use and development is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and the provisions of this Master Program. The approval of the variance would not inflict harm to the area and would not infringe on public welfare and interest. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)took into consideration potential impacts to shoreline,wildlife, and habitat and subsequently issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the project. Furthermore, the applicant has taken substantial measures for mitigating potential impacts through proposed construction methods, shoreline restoration, and modifications to the dock design. Measures include the installation of small,4-inch piles in order to minimize shading impacts,- as well as the placement of two prisms under the dogleg portion of the dock for increased light penetration beneath the structure. In addition, considerable effort has been given to the appropriate design of the restored shoreline in order to maximum benefits to critical habitat. As stated under the previous criterion, the approval of the variance would be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Master Program. f. The proposal must meet the variance criteria contained in the WAC 173-27-170.3, as follows: That the strict application of the bulk, dimensional or performance standards set forth in the applicable master program precludes all reasonable use of the property, For the reasons stated under criterion"a"above, the strict application of the dimensional standards established by the City's Shoreline Master Program would preclude the reasonable use of the property for boat moorage. ii.That the hardship described above is specifically related to the property, and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of the master program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions; Hexre port City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner BAKER/ANDERSON RESIDENTIAL DOCK 8 BULKHEAD LUA-99-049,SV,ECF, SME PUBLIC HEARING DATE:OCTOBER 17,2000 Page 6 of 6 The hardship presented by the applicant is directly related to natural features unique to the subject property. The shallow water depth for the subject site does not allow for the construction of a dock that would be capable of safely mooring a boat. Although shallow water depths may exist in the immediate vicinity of the subject shoreline area, these properties currently have existing docks at lengths in excess of that requested by the applicant(see criterion "b"). iii.That the design of the project is compatible with other authorized uses within the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and shoreline master program and will not cause adverse impacts to the shoreline environment; Based on information provided by the applicant and as discussed under criterion "b", there are a number of existing docks in the immediate area which are substantially longer than the design proposed by the applicant. As determined by the ERC, the proposed dock and shoreline enhancement project would not cause adverse impacts to the shoreline environment. iv.That the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area;that the variance requested is the minimum necessary to afford relief; As previously stated, there are a number of surrounding property owners which currently enjoy the privilege of docks with lengths in excess of the maximum 80-foot length permitted by code. The applicant has substantially reduced the proposed dock length from a preferred design and has thus requested the minimum variance necessary to accommodate the moorage of a boat. The proposed pier would have less moorage and square footage than those enjoyed by neighbors and other property owners in the vicinity v.That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect;and, The approval of the variance would not result in a detrimental effect to the public interest. vi.That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be adversely affected. The approval of the variance would not adversely affect public rights of navigation. I. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested Shoreline Variance for the Baker/Anderson Residential Dock Bulkhead, Project File No. LUA-99-049, SV, ECF, SME. EXPIRATION PERIODS: Shoreline Variance Approval: Two (2)years from the approval date, if construction has not commenced. Hexreport COSTING PIER 1530 SO FT OF DOCK COVERAGE I111011IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII L__ 1•I.'i I 1 LINL1111.11G,Li 0011 I3I i pg I 111 MOUNT.VI(W AVE N I J m I 2060 SO IT)I Z I • II K 8: 4 m C7 VUAI RAMP WOOD PICKET FENCE Tyj u Z NORiII f(Nf.(LINt F'I:N WLUU SDItVEY —_ J ji „_.....--I 393.7¢'09'`D'-S' I Z I i I 1 5'MIN 8 67'-6" 185.54. 0' J ;IIE-1Q1Ir----V 1 R W8PROPOSEDPIERf6IOW'1- 1,560, L--- JII I.I.I AO'-6'J i 310 MOUNT VIEW AVE N z 60' LOT 11.940 SO IT) I e4.2 LOSS i 1 W I i TEMPORARY SILT FENCE J ,-PROPOSED O.H.W.M. • n 1'_T' s 011.W.M. 21 85'AT : Y EXISTING CONCRETE iA Z F BULHEAD I86.27' _ i BIIIBII EXISTING Al2.85 N 89'-S0'-57"E 0 z:SEAPLANE R•.•,yl AO-POPLAR v fl fl DECK AND WALK IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII^:+• I i !C 1 1280 50 FT OF DOCK COVERAGE; try BOAT .1ET IIIN CANOPY O MORGAN,LAVRA 990 50 IT) EXISTING PIER) 3103 MOUNT.VIEW AVE N XZ n II SITE PLAN ISCALE: 1'620' CONSTRUCT NEW PIER 14' X 105'OVER-ALL. PIER WILL BE A 6'WIDE WALKWAY WIDENING TO 8'AND MAKING A JOG 10 TH(SOUTH,WITH TOTAL OVER WATER COVERAGE OF 7.9 SO Ft. O F 1 1v M__°-KEY a PROPOSED STRUCTURES fi r SLIP F7 :-. jr— L ` N 9 i REMOVED VEGETATION TO BE II MORNING GLORY.BUTTERCUP, 1 yy BULLRUSH,AND NON-NATIVE IRIS) K N 1\AY VT -jJ ',33RD 1 417, 7,,. 1 R*'.;Ir, .171Qr; l SLIP 64 o Vie!;' ap,,, ii F 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Q' 1 A'e";i o K 32ND 1/A SLC' St 31-2'IN-05E Jot I bll + TARI.OI / 3N710 38R0 NL - 1 t 1 HLK A LOT 54-55 IIILLMANS LK WN 0 . . SITE/ • .1 L'F GARDEN OF EDEN iI k SH LDS ADJ s 1 HILL„17- • R r`p 0f N. 315T a f ii cp tia, a , ., r-ti 1 'LI Colem' 1,0,, LONG 122'-12'-38' y M N. 3on1 W s q i Gov ,,l rf./.;. W E i 0 rk .6 23.1i M. za Wv urc ccn2 VICINITY MAP W I< SCALE: 1".200' O 0 a a' KEY I u O EXISTING 10'3 CREOSOTE n J2'SAILBOAT TREATED PILES TO BE REMOVED(16 TOTAL) PIUNG(E2 4TOTALNAT I6U 0/C)STEEL V t05' I 6'q I PL 2%G PRESSURE TREATED NORTH Of DECKING REFERENCE I I O 5'MIN atj I LINE O a i NORTHEFER 2 IO 33 REFERENCE iSUNE 0 0 o D.H.W,M.AT 25 PROPOSED PROPOSED 1"SCH, 60 O I O BULKHEAD COATED STEEL PILING i I ga APPROXIMATEILOCATIONoa' PRISMS FOR OF SEWER LINE TH LIGHT PENETRATION N 33X E RENCE e PLAN VIEW REFERENCESOUTHSCALE: 1/4".1' CONSTRUCT NEW PIER 14' z 105'OVER-ALL. LINE PIER WILL CONSIST OF A 6'MAINWALK.WIDENING TO AN 6'WALK AFTER A JOG TO THE SOUTH. 111MIMIN. E4 C 32' SAILBOAT h 0 C 32'SAILBOAT 32 SAILBOAT 1 i O PROPOSEO PIER I mo Topoi,_ a— ._. O.N.W. 0'` 95' gg V i O.L.W. J 20.00' j\ ` y k\\/\\\'. '/ LAKE BOTTOM WEST ELEVATION a SCALE: 1/47.1' i gt W o bgc F oG a a