HomeMy WebLinkAboutAdden 02 CAG-15-089, Adden #2-17
�
Washington State
�� Department of`T�ansportation
Supplemental Agreement OrganizationandAddress
Number 2 Krc,P.s.
Original Agreement Number 3131 Elliot Ave. Ste,400
CAG-15-089 Seattle,WA 98121
Phone� 253-627-0720
Project Number Execution Qate Completion Date
TED4003813 10/23/20l 5 12/31/2019
Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable
Rainier Ave South-Phase 4(S.3rd St to NW 3rd Place) $1,233,974.46
Descrip6on of Work
Provide engineering services for Rainier Ave South-Phase 4 including:30°/a design plans,cost estimate and design report;
conidor-wide screening for hazardous substances;preliminary right of way acquisition plans and estimate;geotechnical report on
subsurface conditions in project limits;design coordination with public and private utilities;coordination with WSDOT for
channelization plan and project analysis approval,environmental permitting support and traffic analysis update.
The Local Agency of Citv of Rencon
desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with �G p.S.
and executed on ���Z3���$ and identified as Agreement No. CAG-is-o89
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
I
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
The General Scope of Work of the Original Agreement and Supplemental Agreement No. 1 is supplemented to include the attached
Exhibit 3.
��
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days
for COrllpletiOn Of the Wo�k to �ead: The completion date is chanQed from 12/31/2U17 to 12/31/2019
111
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
See attached Exhibits"A", 1,D and E.
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate
spaces below and return to this office for final action. \\\\\����„«��,�,t„�����,
.� �F RENTp .
gy_3ason Frii�ler KPG F3y, . Law Ma or .��� ` �,•������u,,,,����ti'��,���
�;;::,.- __.r_ _._.---�- ;� : '- ':
.�- = �
. .�. . _ ;
-� s �
- � ,,- `-- _V � � L ; ^
�
! ,� P...� = : :
onsu4ta htre Ap `rtg uf �ty ignatu�e "
-�" ; * , �. _ � =
.�-•-''! � '
,
- .. —
ATTEST: � l '•, �'Y'���'''����w�������`���Qti a�+av
DOT Form 140-063 J a s A. t , C i y 1 e r k �'��,���pb��,����,�`��l,
Revised 09l2005
Exhibit"A"
Summary of Payments
Basic Agreement Supplement#1 Supplement#2 Total
(See Exhibit 1)
Direct Salary Cost $36,016.47 $91,597.56 $196,612.65 $324,226.68
Overhead
(Including Payroll Additives) $47,358.06 $120,441.63 $258,525.97 $426,325.66
Direct Non-Salary Costs $406.80 $140,104.47 $145,642.84 $286,154.11
Fixed Fee $10,804.94 $27,479.27 $58,983.80 $97,268.01
Total $94,586.27 $379,622.93 $659,765.26 $1,133,974.46
Exhibit 1
Maximum Amount Payable Summary
A/E Professional Services Contract with KPG, P.S.,CAG-15-089,Supplement No. 2
Rainier Ave S-S 3rd St to NW 3rd PI(aka Rainier Ave Phase 4)
Total Total Total
Original+Sup.#1 Sup.#2 only Original+Sup.#'s 1&2
Total Amount Authorized $474,209.20 $659,765.26 $1,133,974.46
Management Reserve Fund $47,420.92 $52,579.08 $100,000.00
Maximum Amount Payable $521,630.12 $712,344.34 $1,233,974.46
Management Reserve(MR) Fund Summary
Original Contract $4,000.00
Supplement#1 $43,420.92
Supplement#2 $52,579.08
Total= $100,000.00
EXHIBIT 3
MODIFIES EXHIBIT A OF THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AND EXHIBIT 2 OF SUPPLEMENT 1
SCOPE OF WORK
SUPPLEMENT 2
AGENCY: CITY OF RENTON
CONSULTANT: KPG, P.S. (KPG, Inc.)
CONTRACT: CAG-15-089
PROJECT: RAINIER AVE S-S 3�d St t0 NW 3rd P�
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Renton is planning to continue infrastructure improvements to the Rainier Ave S
corridor with a new Phase 4.The approximate project limits of the new phase are between S 3�a
St and NW 3�d PI. Similar to Phase 3, this new phase includes infrastructure improvements for
enhanced transit mobility, traffic safety and pedestrian safety. The goals of Phase 4 are to
enhance traffic flow, improve safety,eliminate sub-standard conditions and provide an enhanced
pedestrian environment.
6. PURPOSE
The City of Renton (AGENCY) is requesting A&E Professional Services from KPG, P.S.
(CONSULTANT) for the design of the Rainier Ave S — S 3rd Street to NE 3rd Place Project
(PROJECT). The design of this project is being conducted in multiple phases. Design Phase 1 of
this project was completed in January 2016. Design Phase 2 of this project was substantially
complete in March 2017. This supplemental agreement covers the Scope of Work (SCOPE)
required to complete Design Phase 3 (PHASE 3). PHASE 3 includes the following:
1. develop 30%design plans, cost estimate and design report,
2. perform a corridor-wide screening for hazardous substances,
3. develop preliminary right of way plans and estimate,
4. geotechnical report on subsurface conditions in project limits,
5. design coordination with public and private utilities,
6. coordination with WSDOT for channelization plan and project analysis approval;
7. environmental permitting support,
8. traffic analysis update
The AGENCY anticipates future design phases will include right of way acquisition support, final
plans, specifications and estimate and engineering support during construction. The AGENCY
anticipates that these future design phases will be initiated through a supplement agreement to
this contract.
City of Renton Page 1 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3�d St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
C. DESIGN CRITERIA
The design of this PROJECT shall be in accordance with the following:
• WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines (LAG), M 36-63, April 2017
• WSDOT Design Manual, M 22-01, July 2017
• WSDOT Pavement Policy, June 2015
• WSDOT Geotechnical Design Manual, M 46-03, May 2015
• WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual, M 31-16, February 2016
• WSDOT Hydraulics Manual, M 23-03,January 2015
• WSDOT Right of Way Manual, M 26-01, November 2016
� WSDOT Roadside Manual, M-25-30, February 2016
• WSDOT Traffic Manual, M 51-02,July 2015
• FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2009 Edition
• AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2011 Edition
• AASHTO Roadside Design Guide, 2011 Edition
� AASHTO LRFD Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and
Traffic Signals, 2015 Edition
• City of Renton Standard Details
• King County Surface Water Design Manual, 2016
• City of Renton Amendments to the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual
• Washington State Dept.of Health Water System Design Manual, DOH 331-123, December
2009
• City of Renton Watery System Plan, 2012, Appendix J
• Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Criteria for Sewage Works Design, 98-37 WQ August
2008
The project construction specifications shall be based on the WSDOT Standard Specifications. At
this 30% design phase, no special provisions are to be developed. However, design decisions for
this phase must consider requirements specified in the WSDOT Standard Specifications. The
edition to be utilized for the construction contract provisions will be determined at a later date
and specified in a future supplement for the final engineering design phase.
D. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS
The following SCOPE and associated costs are based on the assumptions outlined below:
• FHWA Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds are being utilized for design services
included in this contract. Therefore, this contract is subject to all rules and regulations
associated with this funding source.
• Any task or deliverable requested by the AGENCY that is not specifically defined in this
SCOPE will not be performed by the CONSULTANT unless one of the following occur:
City of Renton Page 2 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3�d St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
✓ The CONSULTANT provides a written request to the AGENCY to use Management
Reserve funds. This request shall summarize the scope of additional work,
estimated hours and associated direct salary costs by task and adjustment in total
fee. Once received, the AGENCY will evaluate the request. If approved, the
AGENCY will issue a Notice to Proceed in writing.Once received,the CONSULTANT
may proceed with the additional work.
✓ The CONSULTANT provides a draft supplemental agreement to the AGENCY for
review and negotiation.The supplemental agreement shall be complete, including
the scope of additional work, estimated hours and associated direct salary costs
by task, adjustment in total fee and total amount authorized for the contract.The
AGENCY will review the supplement agreement. Once complete, further
negotiations may occur between the parties. Once a scope of work and budget is
agreed to, two (2) complete signed originals will be delivered to the AGENCY, by
the CONSULTANT, for execution by the AGENCY. Once executed, the AGENCY will
issue a Notice to Proceed in writing. Once received, the CONSULTANT may
proceed with the additional work.
• The AGENCY is responsible for the following, as necessary:
✓ Reserve and arrange conference room(s) as necessary, for meetings held at Renton
City Hall.
✓ Prepare and mail project notices, as required.
✓ Prepare and publish all public notices, newsletters and news releases.
✓ Host and update a project website.
✓ All coordination with franchise and public utilities except where identified in the
scope.
✓ Provide CONSULTANT (via AGENCY's GIS) with existing record drawings (as-built
plans) of street and public utilities(water, sanitary sewer, storm), right-of-way(ROW)
plans, horizontal and vertical monument information, GIS maps and other applicable
information, as may be available.
✓ Provide CONSULTANT with all AGENCY standard contract documents and AGENCY bid
forms in Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel and Adobe pdf formats, as applicable.
✓ Provide CONSULTANT with pdf copies of the final NEPA and SEPA checklists and
associated determinations.
✓ Review all submittals from CONSULTANT and provide written comments back to
CONSULTANT within 20 working days. Written comments may take the form of red
line markups.
✓ Contract with a separately selected consultant for environmental services and
permitting.
✓ Provide CONSULTANT with design files of the Lake Washington Loop Trail.
E. TASK ASSUMPTIONS
All assumptions are listed below, at the beginning of each task.
City of Renton Page 3 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave S—5 3'°'St to NW 3'd PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
F. DELIVERABLES
All deliverables to be prepared and produced by the CONSULTANT, as part of this SCOPE, are
identified at the end of each task listed below.
G. SCOPE
DESIGN PHASE NO. 1
PHASE 1 is complete therefore no more hours can be charged to the tasks listed below as
complete.
• Task 1 - Project Management for Design Phase 1 -Complete
• Task 2 -Surveying - Complete
DESIGN PHASE NO. 2
PHASE 2 is substantially complete. No more hours can be charged to the tasks listed below as
complete. Tasks 3, 7, and 8 will remain open during Design Phase 3.
• Task 3 - Project Management for Design Phase 2 -Open
• Task 4-Additional Field Survey-Complete
� Task 5 - Utility Mapping and Inspection - Complete
• Task 6 -Traffic Analysis Report -Complete
• Task 7 - Pavement Assessment Report-Open
• Task 8 -Community and Agency Coordination -Open
• Task 9 - Preliminary Right of Way Investigation -Complete
� Task 10- Preliminary Roadway Alternatives- Complete
• Task 11 -Traffic Counts and Speed Studies - Complete
TASK 12—PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DESIGN PHASE NO. 3
The following items are to be performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 12:
• The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is eight (8) months in duration.
Provide project management of CONSULTANT services, coordination with the AGENCY, monthly
progress reports and invoicing. This effort will include the following elements:
12.1 Administration,Coordination and Supervision
City of Renton Page 4 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave S—S 3`'St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
• Initiate project set-up including establishment of timesheets (charge codes), creation of
project files (electronic and physical) and scheduling of CONSULTANT personnel work
activities.
• Supervision of CONSULTANT personnel and activities to ensure compliance with contract
scope and schedule and proper charging of time against the contract.
• Oversite of sub-consultant activities for compliance with contract scope, schedule and
budget.
12.2 Invoicing
• Preparation of monthly invoices with progress reports that include the following:
✓ Spreadsheet summary of budget, expenses to date, expenses for work period,
estimate to complete and estimate at completion, for each task.
✓ Summary of work accomplished for the work period.
✓ Summary of outstanding issues to be resolved by the AGENCY.
✓ Estimate of percent of work complete for the work period, to justify fee earned.
✓ Graph showing monthly budgeted expenses and actual expense, for the time period
of the contract.
✓ Backup detail that includes the name, direct salary rate and hours charged by date,
for each individual charging time to this contract, for the work period.
✓ Backup detail of all direct non-salary costs included in the invoice for the work period.
12.3 Project Meetings and Site Visits
� Project Kickoff Meeting—After receiving a Notice to Proceed (NTP) from the Agency, set
up a project kickoff ineeting with key Agency and CONSULTANT design team personnel.
The purpose of the meeting is to discuss key elements of the SCOPE, project schedule
timelines and critical path elements. This meeting is to be held at Renton City Hall.
• For any face-to-face project meetings with the AGENCY, the CONSULTANT shall prepare
an agenda, sign-in sheet, record of ineeting including a list of action items, if any.
• Monthly design coordination meetings with AGENCY staff.These meetings are to be held
at Renton City Hall. It is estimated that 8 meetings will be held during Design Phase 3.
� Internal design coordination meetings—The CONSULTANT project manager will conduct
regular internal design coordination meetings with key design team members including
sub-consultants.
DELI VERABLES
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 12.
• Meeting agenda(sJ in Microsoft Word format—Delivered to the AGENCY one(1)business
day before scheduled meeting.
• Sign-in sheet(sJ in Microsofr Word format— Delivered to the AGENCY at the scheduled
meeting.
City of Renton Page 5 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave S—5 3rd St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
• Draft record of ineeting in Microsoft Word format— Delivered to the AGENCY three (3)
business days after scheduled meeting.
� Final record of ineeting in Microsoft Word format— Delivered to the AGENCY three (3)
business days after comments received from AGENCY.
• Monthly invoices with progress reports—Delivered to the AGENCY monthly.
TASK 13—UTILITY COORDINATION
The following items are to be performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 13:
� The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is eight (8) months in duration.
• Future Private Utility coordination is anticipated and will be conducted in the Final Design
Phase.
• Potholing and Survey required to determine depth to existing utilities are not included in
this scope and will occur in the Final Design Phase.
13.1 CONSULTANT shall prepare letters and send emails to each utility showing the preferred
alignment with the intent of notifying each utility of the project limits, establishing utility
point of contacts, and provide updates on the design progress and schedule. A Utility
Contact Matrix will be developed and updated throughout the duration of the project.
13.2 CONSULTANT shall prepare Potential Utility Conflict Plan that will be submitted to all
purveyors with utilities in the project limits to assess whether said utilities may be in
conflict with the proposed improvements. Utilities thought to be in conflict will be
potholed in the Final Design Phase and will continue to be developed after the 30 percent
submittal.
13.3 CONSULTANT shall prepare for and attend meetings (4 assumedj with public and
franchise utilities to discuss potential utility conflicts, relocations, system limitations and
requirements.
DELI VERABLES
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 13.
• One(1)roll plot of Potential Utility Conflict P/an—Delivered to the AGENCY one(1) week
before the franchise utility coordination meeting
• One(1)Excel spreadsheet(delivered via e-mail)of the Ucility Contact Matrix—Delivered
to the AGENCY within three(3J months of the NTP date.
TASK 14 — STORMWATER, WATER, WASTEWATER PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND
COORDINATION
City of Renton Page 6 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—S 3�d St to NW 3�d PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
The following items are to be performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 14:
• The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is eight (8) months in duration.
• Up to three (3) stormwater management alternatives will be evaluated for each of the
project's two threshold discharge areas (TDAs).
� Input from geotechnical engineer will be obtained in Task 17 for evaluation of On-Site
BMPs (infiltration feasibility, depth to groundwater).
• The downstream analysis provided in the Draft TIR will be a Level 1 qualitative analysis.
A numerical analysis to evaluate the direct discharge exemption from flow control is not
included in this scope of work. Based on preliminary analysis performed in January 2017,
it appears that neither TDA will require a flow control facility.
This task includes the effort required to perform preliminary analysis, design and documentation
of the project's stormwater management requirements in accordance with the 2016 City of
Renton Surface Water Design Manual. This task also includes preliminary engineering of water
main and wastewater conveyance infrastructure improvements.
14.1 CONSULTANT will review the existing storm water conveyance facilities within the project
limits; attend one (1) meeting with AGENCY utilities staff; document applicable
regulations, standards, hydrology and hydraulic design criteria; delineate threshold
discharge areas (TDAs); identify any SWM projects proposed in the next ten years based
on review of the City Comprehensive Plan and/or discussions with AGENCY staff;
determine the applicability of Core Requirements #3 (Flow Control), #8 (Water Quality),
and #9 (On-Site BMPs).
14.2 Identify feasible alternative approaches for fulfilling required stormwater management
requirements. The on-site BMP analysis will include coordination with geotechnical
subconsultant and roadway design as applicable. Present alternatives/concepts list to
AGENCY for approval prior to conceptual design/layout work and prepare conceptual
design and layout for each alternative. Evaluate identified alternatives based on
construction cost, right-of-way acquisition cost, maintenance cost, and other relevant
criteria as identified through discussions with AGENCY staff. Document alternatives
analysis and recommended stormwater management approach in a technical
memorandum for AGENCY review and approval.
14.3 Perform preliminary design calculations and sizing of stormwater facilities for selected
alternative for inclusion in the draft Technical Information Report (TIR) and in the 30%
Design Plan submittal.
14.4 Prepare a draft TIR describing the technical information and analysis of the stormwater
facilities. The draft TIR will be in accordance with AGENCY requirements, including a level
1 downstream analysis at up to five locations, hydrologic calculations, detention and
City of Renton Page 7 of 25 KP6
Rainier Ave 5—5 3�d St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
water quality facility design, pipe sizing calculations, and plan view layout as shown on
the 30% plans. The TIR will be finalized concurrent with Final Design Phase.
14.5 CONSULTANT will review the existing water facilities within the project limits and attend
one (1) meeting with AGENCY utilities staff to confirm design criteria, determine
replacements needed, connection points, valves, and pipe alignments.
14.6 CONSULTANT will review the existing wastewater conveyance facilities within the project
limits and attend one (1) meeting with AGENCY utilities staff to confirm design criteria,
determine replacements needed, existing and future side sewer locations, and preferred
pipe alignments.
DELI VERABLES
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 14.
■ Two(2)CD's with electronic copies of the Stormwater Alternaiives Technical Memorandum,
Draft TIR, and Water and Wastewater Preliminary Enqineering Memorandum— Delivered
to the AGENCY within eight(8) months after the Notice to Proceed date.
TASK 15—RIGHT OF WAY PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
The following items are to be performed by the sub consultant, Larson Land Co., under this
task.
Assumptions for Task 15:
• The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is six(6) months in duration.
• Title reports obtained by the CONSULTANT will be delivered to Larson Land Co. on one (1)
CD or DVD.
� The Right of Way Preliminary Cost Estimate relates to the sales review. Larson Land Co.
will research and obtain copies of sales for each zoned property to determine a fair
estimate of value. The reason it is called 'Preliminary' is that the report will not be
sufficient to be used for administrative offer summaries in the future and will require
additional work provided by an outside appraiser.
• Appraisals are not included in this scope of work and will be developed on the Final Design
Phase.
• Additional title reports (if required) will be obtained by the AGENCY and provided to the
CONSULTANT.
This task covers the effort required to produce a Right of Way Preliminary Cost Estimate which
includes the following activities:
15.1 Sales research in the area to be developed. Larson Land Co. will search the public records
City of Renton Page 8 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3rd St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
and interview real estate brokers in the area to determine the cost.
15.2 Estimate the land acquisition component. Larson Land Co. will segregate the
improvement value from the land value in an effort to determine the potential acquisition
land cost.
15.3 Estimate the appraisal and appraisal review costs. Based on the sales research
information from Tasks 15.1 and 15.2, Larson Land Co. will develop the appraisal and
appraisal review cost which will be dependent on the complexity of the subject
properties.
15.4 Estimate the title insurance costs. Once Larson Land Co. has determined the acquisition
cost for the land and improvements, Larson Land Co. will interview the title company and
determine what the typical cost for title insurance would be as it relates to the value of
the property acquired.
15.5 Estimate the Relocation and Negotiation costs. Based on site visits, Larson Land Co. will
determine the estimated relocation impacts on remaining properties as well as utilize the
information obtained from the title reports to better determine the acquisition cost,
which is dependent on the complexity of the title reports.
DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 15.
• One (IJ Excel spreadsheet (delivered via e-mai1J estimating the Right of Way cost
component which wou/d include the costs associated with the items listed in Task 15, as
well as condemnation incidental costs and statutory evaluation costs—Delivered to the
AGENCY within six(6)months after the Notice to Proceed date.
• One(1)Excel spreadsheet(delivered via e-mailJ of Title Reviews for up to 50 tax parcels
—Delivered to the A6ENCY within six(6)months after the Notice to Proceed date.
TASK 16—LINEAR CORRIDOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCIPLINE REPORT
The following items are to be performed by the sub-consultant, GeoEngineers, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 16:
• The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is four(4) months in duration.
• Prior environmental reports as available will be provided by the AGENCY. AGENCY will
provide basic information on each property along the roadway corridor (e.g., tax parcel
numbers and addresses).
• Property title searches are not included.
• ASTM non-scope considerations(e.g., identification,sampling and analysis for radon, lead
in drinking water, lead-based paint, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in light ballast,
City of Renton Page 9 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3rd St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
asbestos-containing building materials or urea formaldehyde in structures, wetlands,
indoor air quality, mold, facility industrial hygiene, facility regulatory compliance, and
facility health and safety) are not included in this scope of work. Soil, soil vapor, surface
water, or groundwater sampling and chemical analyses are not included in this scope of
work.
• Includes time to attend on project team meeting to discuss project design plans and
corridor screening results.
• Up to two redrafts of the report will be provided to incorporate review comments.
A hazardous material technical report will be completed in accordance with WSDOT's Guidance
and Standard Methodology for WSDOT Hazardous Materials Discipline Reports and Section 447
of the Environmental Procedures Manual (EPM). The report will be right-sized to fit the scope of
the project and provide the data necessary to recognize and assess the impact of the project.
The objective is to evaluate the presence, likely presence, or potential for, hazardous substances
that could affect right-of-way acquisition, project design or construction. This study will support
the preliminary environmental assessment for partial takes, temporary construction easements
and permanent construction easements, and NEPA documentation.
16.1 Review of Previous Report(s) — Review previous environmental report(s) for the project
or parcels adjacent to the current right-of-way if any.
16.2 Site Screening Review/Regulatory Database Study-Review the results of a recent federal,
state, local and tribal environmental database search (Environmental Database Resources
[EDR] Report) for listings of sites with known or suspected environmental conditions on
or near the project generally within the search distances specified by ASTM International
(ASTM) Standard E 1527-13, to include the following at a minimum:
• Federal National Priority (NPL) Site List
• Federal CERCLIS List
• Federal RCRA CORRACTS TSD Facilities List
• Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities List
• Federal RCRA Generators List
• Federal ERNS List
• Ecology lists of hazardous waste sites identified for investigation or remediation (State
Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites List (CSCSL) and Hazardous Sites List (HSL)
• Washington State's Landfill and Solid Waste Sites Lists
• Ecology Leaking UST List and Registered UST List
� Ecology and EPA Spills Databases
• County database of suspect or known drug lab sites
16.3 Field Reconnaissance/Windshield Survey - Conduct a drive-by reconnaissance of the
project footprint (project area of impact). The windshield survey will focus on sites with
known or suspected environmental concerns that could potentially affect acquisition,
design or construction. All properties being considered for partial acquisition for right-of-
City of Renton Page 10 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3'd St to NW 3'd PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
way (ROW) will be included in this effort as applicable. The windshield survey will be
limited to features readily observed from public access corridors. Private property will
not be entered for this effort unless right-of-entry has been provided by the
AGENCY. Information regarding the sites will be recorded in field notes and photographs.
16.4 File Review, Aerial Photograph Review, Data Validation — Review historical aerial
photographs and historical AGENCY directories to identify properties within and outside
of the proposed ROW that have a potential to affect acquisition, design or construction
due to possible or known presence of contaminants. Review regulatory agency files for
suspect sites noted during the field reconnaissance and historical review, and identify the
nature and extent of any known contamination, completed remedial activities and the
effect these sites may have on environmental conditions within the project corridor. This
task will be accomplished by performing the following activities:
• Review publicly available on-line records from the Washington State Department of
Ecology (Ecology) and request Ecology hard copy files as necessary.
� Review available geologic literature and topographic maps to evaluate surface drainage
paths as well as groundwater depth and flow direction in the project area.
• Review available aerial photographs and AGENCY historical directories to flag suspect
historical uses and development history for potential sources of contamination.
• Review historical tax assessor records for specific parcels as necessary.
• Screen the suspect properties based on their location relative to prospective ROW
construction areas as well as on additional site-specific environmental data available in
regulatory agency files. This screening process will identify conditions that represent the
potential to significantly affect the ROW acquisition area, including design, acquisition or
construction.
16.5 Impacts and Mitigation Measures
• Evaluate potential impacts that known or suspected contamination may have on project
development, including property acquisition, design and construction activities and
costs.
� Identify potential mitigation measures and options to minimize potential impacts of
hazardous substances to the proposed project.
16.6 Prepare Draft Report — Prepare a draft report including a summary of the results in
accordance with Section 447 of the EPM. Up to two redrafts will be issued prior to final
report. The redrafts may incorporate comments from the AGENCY or WSDOT.
16.7 Administration, Coordination, and Supervision — Project setup and file documentation
management; subcontracts to prime and coordination regarding schedule and findings;
monthly invoicing including budget and schedule tracking and percent complete, invoice
backup and detail in format required by City.
City of Renton Page 11 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3�d St To NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
DELI VERABLES:
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 16.
• Two (2J CD's with electronic pdf copy of the Draft Hazardous Material Technical Report
—Delivered to the Agency within four(4)months after receiving written notice to proceed.
• Two(2J CD's with electronic pdf copy of the Final Hazardous Material Technical Report
—Delivered to the Agency within two (2) weeks after review comments received.
TASK 17—PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
The following items are to be performed by the sub-consultant, Amec Foster Wheeler
Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler), under this task.
Assumptions for Task 17:
• The budget shown in Exhibit G1 assumes this task is six (6) months in duration.
• Base maps showing topography and existing structures and utilities will be provided to
Amec Foster Wheeler prior to the field exploration.
• AGENCY will provide ROW Use Permit(s) based on traffic control plans provided by Amec
Foster Wheeler. Any fees or deposits related to ROW Use Permits will be waived by the
AG E N CY.
• Field exploration within the driving lanes of Rainier Avenue might have restricted hours
of 9am to 3pm. Field exploration in other locations, such as sidewalks can be conducted
Monday through Friday, 7 am -7 pm.
• Borehole holes within pavement will be patched with ready-mix concrete.
� Preliminary plans showing the proposed improvements will be provided to Amec Foster
Wheeler for engineering analyses and report preparation.
• The CONSULTANT with input from the AGENCY will provide preliminary design
information, such as structure types and locations.
• Engineering will be based on the WSDOT and AASHTO design methods to the extent
practical.
Amec Foster Wheeler will conduct a field investigation and engineering analyses in order to
provide design recommendations for improvements within the project limits. These services will
include: subsurface exploration; laboratory testing of selected soil samples; geologic
interpretation; engineering analyses; and the preparation of a preliminary geotechnical
engineering report;that will provide up recommendations for: pole foundations; utility trenches;
stormwater infiltration; pavements outside the drive lanes; backfilled retaining walls (if any).
17.1 Administration, Coordination and Supervision
City of Renton Page 12 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—S 3'd St to NW 3'a PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
• Initiate project set-up including establishment of timesheets (charge codes), creation of
project files(electronic and physical), scheduling of Amec Foster Wheeler personnel work
activities, setting up subcontracts, and scheduling subcontractor activities.
• Coordinate task work activities with CONSULTANT and project schedule.
• Supervise Amec Foster Wheeler personnel activities to ensure compliance with contract
scope and schedule and proper charging of time against the contract.
� Over-see activities of sub-consultants and service companies for compliance with
contract scope, schedule and budget.
• Prepare monthly invoices with progress reports that include the following:
✓ Spreadsheet summary of budget, expenses to date, expenses for invoice period,
estimate to complete and estimate at completion,for each task assigned to Amec
Foster Wheeler.
✓ Summary of work accomplished for the invoice period.
✓ Estimate of percent of work complete for the invoice period,to justify fee earned.
✓ Summary of outstanding issues to be resolved by the AGENCY and/or
CONSULTANT.
✓ Backup detail that include the name, direct salary rate and hours charged by date,
for each individual charging time to this contract, for the work period.
✓ Backup detail of all direct non-salary costs included in the invoice for the work
period.
17.2 Field Exploration Preparation: The following activities will be performed in preparation
of the subsurface investigation:
• Prepare traffic control plans.
• Apply for a ROW Use permit from the AGENCY.
• Review the proposed improvements, visit the site, and mark potential exploration
locations
• Notify the Underground Utility Location Center of the proposed drilling locations and
allow time for the utilities in the vicinity to be located with paint.
• Schedule subcontracted private utility locater, traffic control, and drilling crew.
• Prepare job safety assessment for the field activities.
17.3 Subsurface Exploration: In general, field exploration will consist of drilling soil borings at
strategic locations along the proposed improvements.
• Subcontract the services of a traffic control company to place signs, cones, and
flaggers to route traffic around the work area in accordance with AGENCY approved
traffic control plans.
• Subcontract the services of a drilling company to drill up to 20 soil borings. A trailer
mounted drill rig will be used to drill 5 to 20 feet below the ground surface. Drilling
depths will depend on conditions encountered, but up to 5 days have been budgeted.
Samples will be collected of the pavement subgrade soils and at 2.5 or S foot intervals.
The depth of groundwater will be measured within the bore hole at the time of
City of Renton Page 13 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—S 3�d St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
drilling.
• Some hand explorations may substitute or supplement the drilled borings depending
on the access, utility conflicts, and location of proposed improvements.
• In two of the boreholes, the drillers will install groundwater observation wells with a
flush-mounted steel monument. The other borings will be backfilled with bentonite
chips and quick-set concrete.
• Amec Foster Wheeler will measure the groundwater in the observation wells twice
over the winter.
• Submit selected soil samples to a subcontracted testing laboratory for measuring the
index and engineering properties of the soil. The following tests have been assumed
for budgeting but may be modified based on the conditions encountered.
0 30 moisture contents; and
0 15 grain size distributions (sieve only).
• Prepare soil boring logs that summarize the conditions encountered.
� Update site exploration plans to display the locations of the explorations.
• Update the geologic profile with the additional boring logs.
17.4 Geotechnical Engineering: Perform engineering analysis in order to provide soil design
parameters and recommendations for the following purposes:
• Foundations for signal poles and lighting poles.
• Utility installation: trenching, support, and backfill.
• Preliminary assessment of stormwater infiltration based on subsurface information
and correlation of grain size distribution. In-situ testing is not part of this preliminary
design scope, but may be needed for final design.
• Pavements that have not been designed previously, such as sidewalks.
• Backfilled retaining walls; at this time it is not known if walls will be needed.
17.5 Structural Engineering: Engineering analysis is anticipated for pole foundations in the
event that soft ground prevents the use of WSDOT standard pole foundation designs. Up
to two pole foundations may be designed, and up to two plan sheets would be prepared
to describe the designs.
17.6 Amec Foster Wheeler will prepare a Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report that
summarizes the findings, conclusions and recommendations of this study. A draft
preliminary report will be provided to the CONSULTANT for review by the CONSULTANT
and AGENCY. Once review comments are received, a final preliminary report will be
submitted to the CONSULTANT to deliver to the AGENCY.
17.7 Meetings: Up to four(4) meetings have been budgeted.
• Project Kickoff Meeting — After receiving a notice to proceed from the CONSULTANT,
attend a project kickoff ineeting with key AGENCY and CONSULTANT design team
personnel. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss key elements of the SCOPE, project
City of Renton Page 14 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3'd St to NW 3�d PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
schedule timelines and critical path elements. This meeting is to be held at Renton City
Hall.
• Design coordination meetings with AGENCY and CONSULTANT staff. These meetings are
to be held at Renton City Hall. It is estimated that Amec Foster Wheeler will attend up to
3 meetings.
• Internal design coordination meetings — Amec Foster Wheeler will conduct regular
internal design coordination meetings with key design team members and as applicable
Amec Foster Wheeler sub-consultants.
DELIVERABLES:
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 17.
• Completed ROW Use Permit application and associated traffic control p/an for drilling—
Delivered to the AGENCY's permit counter within eight (8) weeks after receiving written
notice to proceed.
• Two (2J CD's with electronic pdf copy of the Draft and Final Geotechnical Engineering
Report and Signa/Pole Foundation Plans—Delivered to the Agency within six(6J months
after receiving written notice to proceed.
TASK 18—ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING SUPPORT
The following items are to be performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 18:
� The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is eight (8) months in duration.
• Preparation of all necessary environmental permits will be the responsibility of the
AGENCY.
18.1 The CONSULTANT shall provide documentation support to the AGENCY's selected
environmental services consultant for the development of the environmental permitting
documents. These include, but are not limited to technical reports developed in Tasks
16/17/19, aerial maps, quantities, and figures.
DELI VERABLES:
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 18.
• Electronic pdf copies of aeria/maps, quantities, and figures—Delivered to the AGENY
and environmental services consulrant within eight(8J months(and when requested)
after the Notice to Proceed date.
City of Renton Page 15 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3rd St to NW 3'd PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
TASK 19—S 2 STREET EXTENSION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AND 10% DESIGN
The following items are to be performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 19:
• The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is six(6) months in duration.
� This analysis will be included as an appendix to the April 2017 Rainier Avenue S—Phase 4
traffic analysis report ("April 2017 report").
• This supplemental traffic analysis assumes a preferred alternative has been selected for
Rainier Avenue S Phase 4.
• The traffic analysis assumes two-way operations for the extension of S 2nd Street
between Rainier Avenue S and Hardie Avenue SW during both the 2022 and 2035 study
yea rs.
• For intersections along Rainier Avenue 5, the analysis of existing 2016 conditions, 2022
year of opening and 2035 horizon year will use traffic counts and forecasts from the April
2017 report.
• The study will include AM, midday and PM peak hour analysis for existing 2016/2017,
2022 and 2035 conditions.
� The AGENCY will provide signal timing for the two intersections at Taylor Avenue
NW/Hardie Avenue NW/Renton Avenue Extension and Hardie Avenue NW/SW Langston
Road/SW Sunset Boulevard.
• Survey and basemapping are not included in this scope of work.
• Cost estimates for the S 2"d Street Extension are not included in this scope of work.
This task will provide a supplementary traffic analysis and a 10% Design Layout for the extension
of S 2nd Street between Rainier Avenue S and Hardie Avenue SW ("S 2nd Street extension").
Synchro/SimTraffic 9 traffic modeling shall be used for this task.
19.1 The CONSULTANT shall utilize the services of a traffic data company to perform 2-hour
turning movement counts at the following intersections during the AM, midday (1 PM to
3 PM) and PM peak periods.
� SW Victoria Street and Renton Avenue S
• Taylor Avenue NW/Hardie Avenue SW and Renton Ave Extension
• Hardie Avenue SW and SW Victoria Street
• Hardie Avenue SW/SW Langston Road and SW Sunset Boulevard
19.2 The CONSULTANT shall utilize the services of a traffic data company to perform one (1)
seven (7) day traffic count on Hardie Avenue SW at a location south of SW 2nd Street.
19.3 The CONSULTANT shall expand the for the AM peak hour, midday peak hour and PM peak
hour existing conditions Synchro models from the 2016 analysis with signal timing
City of Renton Page 16 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—S 3rd St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
provided by the AGENCY and with traffic data collected. The analysis will analyze the
following 10 intersections:
1. SW Victoria Street and Renton Avenue S
2. Taylor Avenue NW/Hardie Avenue SW and Renton Ave Extension
3. Hardie Avenue SW and SW Victoria Street
4. Hardie Avenue SW/SW Langston Road and SW Sunset Boulevard
5. Rainier Avenue S and Renton Ave Ext./Airport Way
6. Rainier Avenue S and S Tobin Street
7. Rainier Avenue S and Hayes Place SW
8. Rainier Avenue S and SW Victoria Street
9. Rainier Avenue S and S 2nd Street
10. Rainier Avenue S and SW Sunset Blvd./S 3rd Street
The following existing parameters shall added for each new study intersection to the
existing conditions Synchro models:
• Distances between intersections
� Lane approach info
• Saturation flow rate as calculated by Synchro methodology
• Lane width
• Grade (%)
• Storage length
• Number of storage lanes
• Detector information
• Lane utilization factor for movements with two or more lane approaches
• Heavy vehicle (%)
• Signal timing
• Pedestrian calls
The expanded existing conditions Synchro models shall be calibrated to match real-world
conditions using SimTraffic. Saturation flow rates shall use Synchro methodology which
calculates the rate based on adjustment to lane widths, grade, lane utilization, turning
movements and pedestrian-bicycle conflicts, and reflects changes for future conditions.
For the SimTraffic, a minimum of five (5) and maximum of ten (10) simulation runs shall
be performed for each existing conditions Synchro model. The results shall be averaged.
A 10 minute seed time and 60 minute record time shall be used for each run. The
SimTraffic results shall be compared with the traffic data collected to determine if the
model results are in line with observed traffic patterns and volumes.
19.4 The CONSULTANT will analyze traffic operations for the 2022 and 2035 AM, midday and
PM peak hours. The analysis will use the 2022 and 2035 traffic forecasts from the April
2017 report to develop traffic forecasts with the addition of the S 2nd Street extension.
City of Renton Page 17 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave S—5 3rd St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
AM, midday and PM peak hour Synchro models will be developed for the following
scenarios:
� Existing Conditions
• 2022 baseline conditions
• 2022 with the S 2nd Street Extension
• 2035 baseline conditions
• 2035 with the S 2nd Street Extension
The following parameters shall be input for each scenario:
• Distances between intersections
• Lane approach info
� Saturation flow rate as calculated by Synchro methodology
• Lane width
• Grade (%)
• Storagelength
• Number of storage lanes
• Detector information
• Lane utilization factor for movements with two or more lane approaches
• Heavy vehicle (%)
• Signal timing
� Pedestrian calls
19.5 The CONSULTANT will recommend channelization, traffic control, and non-motorized
facilities for the intersections at Hardie Avenue S/S 2nd Street extension and Rainier
Avenue S/S 2nd Street. As needed, recommended improvements will be identified at
other streets or study intersections affected by the S 2nd Street extension referenced in
Task 19.1.
19.6 The CONSULTANT shall add the supplemental traffic analysis from Tasks 19.1 to 19.5 as
an appendix to the April 2017 report. The CONSULTANT shall provide a draft Traffic
Analysis Report for review by the AGENCY. Once comments are received from the
AGENCY, the CONSULTANT shall update the report and submit a final Traffic Analysis
Report to the AGENCY.
19.7 The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Conceptual Design (10%) Layout in AutoCAD format
drafted with an aerial backdrop of the 2"d Street extension from Rainier Ave S to Hardie
Ave SW and any proposed roadway improvement identified in Task 19.5. The layout will
show (plan view) roadway channelization, curbs, sidewalks, and signal pole/mastarm
locations that supports the findings and conclusions referenced in the traffic analysis. The
CONSULTANT will include the 10% design channelization in the draft and final Traffic
Analysis as an appendix.
City of Renton Page 18 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3'd St to NW 3rd P�
Supp/ement 2 10/2/2017
DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 19.
• Two(2) CD's with electronic pdf copies of the draft Traffic Analysis—Delivered to the
AGENCY within five(5)months after the Notice to Proceed date.
• Two (2)DVD's with electronic copies of draft Synchro models(total=15J—Delivered to
the AGENCY within five(5) months after the Notice to Proceed date.
• Two(2) CD's with electronic pdf copies of the final Traffic Analysis and responses to
review comments—Delivered to the A6ENCY within two(2) weeks after comments are
received from AGENCY.
• Two (2J DVD's with electronic copies of final Synchro models(tota1=15J—Delivered to
the AGENCY within two(2) weeks after comments are received from AGENCY.
• One(1J roll plot of Conceptual Design (10%J—Delivered to the AGENCY within six(6)
months after the Notice to Proceed date.
TASK 20—WSDOT COORDINATION
The following items are to be performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 20:
• The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is eight (8) months in duration.
• Only the intersection Rainier Ave S and S 3rd Street will require WSDOT Project Analysis,
Channelization Plans, and Signal Permit approvals.
This task includes the effort required to attend introductory project review meetings with WSDOT
staff to provide project updates on the preferred roadway alternative and share the necessary
design files/reports to obtain feedback on the preliminary Rainier Ave S channelization plans,
review revisions to the Rainier Ave S/SW Sunset Boulevard intersection, discuss the S 2�d Street
Signal/Road Extension, and Traffic Analysis findings. Additionally, the CONSULTANT will prepare
a Project Analysis, Channelization Plans, and Signal Permit for WSDOT review and approval.
20.1 The CONSULTANT shall prepare for and attend two (2) meetings with WSDOT. Design roll
plots and reports pertinent to the meeting will be provided. It is anticipated that the first
meeting with WSDOT staff will introduce the 10% channelization design in an effort to
identify issues of significance early on. The second meeting will be held after the 30%
design is underway and once items identified in the first meeting have been incorporated
into the most up to date channelization plan. The CONSULTANT will continue
coordination efforts with WSDOT between the two meetings via phone calls and email
correspondence.
City of Renton Page 19 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3�d St to NW 3'd PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
20.2 CONSULTANT shall prepare WSDOT channelization plans that will meet current WSDOT
channelization plan requirements. This effort will begin once the AGENCY selects a
preferred alignment alternative and after the AGENCY reviews the Channelization Plans.
Once the channelization plans have been approved by WSDOT, the CONSULTANT shall
prepare one (1) mylar plan set for the final WSDOT submittal to WSDOT.
20.3 The CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit WSDOT Project Analysis in accordance with
current WSDOT requirements including required supporting documentation, deviation
requests, Basis of Design matrix, and design vehicle turning movement analysis. It is
anticipated that an approval will require four(4) submittals of the analysis.
20.4 The CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit a WSDOT signal permit applications for new
and revised signals in accordance with WSDOT requirements. It is anticipated that
approval will require two (2) submittals of the applications.
DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 20.
• Two (2)DVD's with electronic pdf copies of the Approved Channelization Plans, Project
Analysis, and Signal Permits—Delivered to the AGENCY after WSDOT Approval.
TASK 21—ILLUSTRATIVE DESIGN AND URBAN DESIGN PACKAGE
The following items are to be performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 21:
� The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is six (6) months in duration.
• Proposed urban design elements and plantings will utilize the previous phase of Rainier
Avenue as a template.
This tasks includes the effort required to prepare an Urban Design Package and Illustrative Design
Layout of the preferred roadway alternative with the purpose of obtaining input from project
stakeholders during the development of the 30% Design Plans and to support the public
involvement effort with materials suitable for a community open house.
21.1 The Consultant shall develop an Urban Design Package which will include the following
illustrations:
❑ Illustrative Roadway Section
❑ Roadway Photo Simulations
❑ Decorative illumination and Bases
City of Renton Page 20 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave S—5 3rd St to NW 3�d PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
21.2 The Consultant will advance the preferred roadway alternative layout to an Illustrative
Design Roll Plot showing the project urban design elements, plantings, and surface
features with colored hatching to better illustrate the design features along the corridor.
DELI VERABLES
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 21.
• Two (2J CD's with electronic pdf copies of the draft Urban Design Package—Delivered
to the AGENCY within six(6)months after the Notice to Proceed date.
• Two (2J CD's with electronic pdf copies of the final Urban Design Package—Delivered
to the AGENCY within two (2)after comments are received from AGENCY.
• One(1J lllustrative Design Roll Plot—Delivered to the AGENCY within six(6J months
after the Notice to Proceed date.
TASK 22—30% DESIGN
The following items are to be performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 22:
� The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is eight (8) months in duration.
• All drafting will be done in accordance with standards listed in Exhibit C.
• For the purposes of this alternatives analysis the AGENCY is assuming this project qualifies
as a "re-construction project"as defined in the WSDOT LAG Manual.Therefore,the street
design elements will be subject to the requirements of the WSDOT LAG Manual, Local
Agency Design Matrices.
• The AGENCY will select a preferred roadway alternative before the 30% Design effort
begins.
• The S 2nd Street Extension Design (Task 19) will not be included in the 30% Design
submittal.
• Assumptions will be made in determining easements areas and locations for utilities,
slopes, walls, structures, and will be further defined in the Final Design Phase.
This task includes the effort required to develop 30% Design Plans, Estimates, and supporting
design analyses.
22.1 The CONSULTANT will evaluate property access alternatives considering driveway
consolidation/shared access, driveway relocations, and parking impacts/remedies as
appropriate.. Address concerns raised during community open house meetings and one
on one property owner meetings. The Consultant will prepare a plan and profile for each
existing access along the project once the AGENCY has confirmed the curb locations along
Rainier Ave S. Where existing access cannot be maintained, the Consultant will prepare
City of Renton Page 21 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3rd St to NW 3'd PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
up to two alternatives with plan / profile sketches showing the new access, circulation,
and parking (assume 10 total sketches). The CONSULTANT will summarize the findings in
a brief inemorandum with plan sketches for review by the AGENCY and the selected
access alternatives will be incorporated in future design submittals.
22.2 The CONSULTANT will develop cross sections of the selected roadway alternative and
evaluate relative impacts to stormwater facilities quality& quantity analysis, Preliminary
ROW Areas, and Walls
22.3 The CONSULTANT will prepare preliminary construction phasing concepts for the
preferred roadway alternative. Traffic control requirements and construction sequencing
criteria will be analyzed and shown graphically on roll plot. The construction phasing
concepts will take into account information gathered during the utility coordination
effort, stormwater management, and requirements gathered from the WSDOT
coordination effort. No plans will be prepared until the Final Design Phase.
22.4 The CONSULTANT shall evaluate lighting performance using the AG132 illumination
model that shows lighting levels/uniformity consistent with the current AGENCY"s
illumination standards and that coincide with Rainier Avenue South Phase 3
Improvements. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a preliminary layout of the street
illumination system, include supporting calculations and lighting levels summarized in an
AGI Lighting Report.
22.5 The CONSULTANT will develop preliminary/proposed ROW requirements and take areas
calculated that supports the 30% Design Improvements and the Preliminary ROW True
Cost effort in Task 15. Preliminary/proposed ROW and easement lines will be shown on
the 30% Roadway Plan Sheets.
22.6 The CONSULTANT shall prepare 30%complete drawings of the project. In general, these
plans will convey the proposed horizontal locations of the proposed improvements but
will not include construction notes, specific construction details, or vertical locations. It
is anticipated that the 30% Plans will include the following:
Sheet list
Cover sheet (1 sheet)
Sheet Index,Survey Control &Alignment Data (1 sheet)
Legend and Abbreviations (1 sheet)
Existing Conditions (13 sheets)
Roadway Typical Sections (3 sheets)
Roadway Details (2 sheets)
Site Preparation Plans (13 sheets)
City of Renton Page 22 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3�d St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
Roadway Plans (13 sheets)
Roadway CL Profiles (13 sheets)
Drainage Plans (13 sheets)
Drainage Details (6 sheets)
Water Plans (13 Sheets)
Wastewater Plans (13 Sheets)
Illumination Plans (13 sheets)
Traffic Signal Plans and Notes (8 sheets)
Channelization and Si�nin�Plans (13 sheets)
TOTAL= 139 sheets
22.7 The CONSULTANT shall prepare a 30% Design Cost Estimate showing proposed pay items
and method of ineasurement.
22.8 The CONSULTANT shall prepare a draft and final Design Report outlining the existing
conditions, proposed project improvements, geometrics, and design criteria. The report
will include supporting appendices such as the Auto Turn Analysis, Draft TIR, 30% Design
Cost Estimate,Traffic Analysis, Illumination Report, and Preliminary Cross Sections.
DELIVERABLES:
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 22.
� Two(2) CD's with electronic pdf copies of the draft AGI Lighting Report—Delivered to
the AGENCY within eight(8)months after the Notice to Proceed date.
• Two (2J CD's with electronic pdf copies of the final AGI Lighting Report—Delivered to
the AGENCY within two weeks(2)after comments are received from AGENCY.
• Two(2)DVD's with electronic pdf copies of the 30%Design Plans—Delivered to the
AGENCY within eight(8)months after the Notice to Proceed date.
• Two (2J CD's with electronic pdf copies and Excel spreadsheet of the 30%Design
Estimate—Delivered to the AGENCY within eight(8) months after the Notice to Proceed
date.
• One(I) Cross Section Roll Plot and full/half size plan sets—Delivered to the AGENCY
within six(6)months after the Notice to Proceed date.
• Two(2J DVD's with electronic pdf copies of the draft Design Report—Delivered to the
AGENCY within eight(8J months after the Notice to Proceed date.
• Two (2J CD's with electronic pdf copies of the final Design Report—Delivered to the
AGENCY within two weeks(2) after comments are received from AGENCY.
City of Renton Poge 23 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave S—5 3rd St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
TASK 23—QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL(QA/QC) FOR DESIGN PHASE N0. 3
This task shall involve CONSULTANT staff to review and control the outgoing documents through
a process of Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/qC). The following items are to be
performed by the CONSULTANT, under this task.
Assumptions for Task 23:
• The budget shown in Exhibit D assumes this task is eight (8) months in duration.
• Two (2) audits assumed for the purposes of this scope.
23.1 QA/QC Plan -The CONSULTANT shall prepare and submit to the AGENCY, a QA/QC Plan
for deliverables identified in Tasks 13 thru 22. The QA/QC Plan shall include the names,
titles and roles of those individuals designated to review the deliverables prior to formal
submission to the AGENCY. The QA/QC Plan shall include checklist(s) to be completed by
the reviewer(s) upon completion the review(s).
23.2 QA/QC Reviews - The CONSULTANT shall schedule technical discipline review, lead
designer review, and principle review of the deliverables. Technical discipline reviews
shall be performed while the detailed technical work is in progress (e.g. computations are
completed, development of plan sheets, etc.). Lead designers shall review specific
products such as drawing sets, reports,specifications,technical memorandums and other
documents requiring the seal of a licensed professional engineer prior to submission to
the AGENCY per WAC 196-23-020. Principle reviews shall be performed for an overall task
when and as defined in the QA/QC plan. Such reviews shall be performed after project
packages are assembled and before they are submitted for review to the AGENCY. QA/QC
efforts and reviews shall include the work performed by the CONSULTANT and their
subconsultants.
23.3 QA/QC Audits - The AGENCY may perform periodic audits of QA/qC comments and
responses generated from technical discipline reviews, lead design reviews and/or
principle reviews.The audit(s) will occur at the CONSULTANT's office(s).The AGENCY will
notify the Consultant of audit(s), up to one week in advance.The AGENCY will coordinate
with the CONSULTANT to schedule the date, time and office location of the audit(s).
DELIVERABLES
The following deliverables and delivery times are included in Task 23.
• QA/QC P/an in pdf format—Delivered to the AGENCY via e-mail within two (2) weeks
after the Notice to Proceed date.
City of Renton Page 24 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave 5—5 3�d St to NW 3�d PI
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The AGENCY may require additional services from the CONSULTANT. The scope of work for
additional services will be determined based on anticipated or unanticipated project needs or
other considerations at the sole discretion of the AGENCY. This work may include items identified
in the current task authorizations as well other items, which may include, but are not necessarily
limited to the following:
• Final Engineering Design Services
• Right of Way Acquisition and Appraisal Services
• Additional Surveying Services
• Engineering Support During Construction
• Other services not specifically referenced in this scope of work
These services will be authorized under a future contract supplement if necessary. At the time
these services are required, the CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed scope of work and an
estimate of costs. The CONSULTANT shall not proceed with the work until the AGENCY has
authorized the work and issued a notice to proceed.
City of Renton Page 25 of 25 KPG
Rainier Ave S—5 3�d St to NW 3rd P�
Supplement 2 10/2/2017
KPG Exhibit D
CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
SUMMARY OF COST
City of Renton
Rainier Avenue S - S 3rd St to NW 3rd PI
Supplement 2
Direct Salary Direct Salary
Classification Cost Total Hours Total Cost
Senior Engineer $84.13 50 $4,206.50
Project Manager $64.42 385 $24,801.70
Survey Manager $72.84 4 $291.36
Project Surveyor $47.12 40 $1,884.80
Sr. Proj Engineer/LA $59.05 880 $51,964.00
Sr. Dsn Engineer/LA/Surv $43.77 1719 $75,240.63
Design Engr/LA Tech $28.65 940 $26,931.00
Technician $38.70 247 $9,558.90
Clerical $30.96 56 $1,733.76
DSC Subtotal 4,321 $196,612.65
ICR Cost (Include Salary Additives)
ICR x DSC of 131.49% $196,612.65 $258,525.97
Fixed Fee (FF)
FF Rate 30.00% $196,612.65 $58,983.80
DSC Total $514,122.42
Direct Reimbursables
Mileage $2,097.20
Amec Foster Wheeler $84,839.99
GeoEngineers $19,405.65
Larson Land Co $36,850.00
IDAX $2,200.00
Reproduction $250.00
Reimbursable Total $145,642.84
Total Amount Supplement No. 2 $659,765.26
MR Allowed $100,000.00
MR Previously Authorized $47,420.92
2 MR Allowed - MR Previousl Authorized $52,579.08
(1+2) Total Amount Payable Supplement No. 2 $712,344.34
City of Renton Date: 10/03/17
EXHIBIT D
FEE SUMMARY ����
♦ ArchiLecture ♦
Landacape Architecture
♦ Civii Engineering ♦
Project: City of Renton
Rainier Ave S -S 3rd St to NW 3rd PI - Supplement No. 2
10/03/2017
Description Estimated Fee
Task 12 - Project Management for Design Phase 3 $41,794.30
Task 13- Utility Coordination $17,924.61
Task 14-Storm, Water, Wastewater $52,034.31
Task 15- Right of Way True Cost Estimate $44,840.29
Task 16-Linear Corridor Haz Mat Report $25,747.98
Task 17-Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report $91,110.42
Task 18- Environmental Permitting Support $5,743.37
Task 19-S 2nd St Extension TA and 10% Design $43,186.20
Task 20-WSDOT Coordination $42,407.34
Task 21 - Illustrative Design and Urban Design Package $20,833.59
Task 22-30% Design $233,719.79
Task 23-QA/QC $40,423.06
Total Estimated Fee $659,765.26
Cify of Renton
RainierAvenue S-S3rd St to NW 3rd PI Page 1 of 7 KPG
Supplement 2 10/03/2017
EXHIBIT D
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Project: City of Renton ���
Rainier Avenue S-S 3rd St to NW 3rd PI-Supplement 2
• Arohitaoture ♦ �
10I03/2017 l.andiscape Architocnuc �'
♦ Civil Enginearsrt� •
Labor Hour Estimate Total Fee
Sr Osn Engr/ Design �� ,
Senior � Projed �i Survey Project Sr Prq Engd W � Engd ��, '�, '�, �.
Tesk Dese�iption Engineer� Manager ��, Manager Surveyor SeniorW Surveyor '�, LATech '�, Tech Clerical �I, Direct '�.� Overhead �'�..� Profit '�,EHedivemufliplier
S 84.13 S 64.42 E 72.84 S 47.12 $ 59.05 3 43.77 § 28.65 S 38.70 E 30.%�. Hours ''�, LaborCost �'�,, 131.49% '��, 30% �i 2.6149
Taak 12-P�o'ect Mana ement for Desi n Phase 3
12.2 Montlhy invooci Coordination and Su ervision _ .. t- - 0 ���24 {� 0 � 0 �I 04 0� � 0 � � 0�� i6 � 40�_ �'427 $ 12,439J8
__. -- P -_. .._ -_. ___ ___ __ _ __ _ _ 4.757'�. 6.255'�..
__�_ �__._ -__. .._____....
9 � ' 2.041 2.6841 612 8 5.338.16
12.3 Pro�ect MeMings and Sde Vistls(8 Agency.20 Stafl Meetmgs)___ '� 2 ��� 32 ' 0 0 '�, 60 60 I 16 '�. 0 0 170��� 8,85P�.. 11,646�'. 2,657 S 23,160.95
Reimbursable e enses-see breakdown for details � � �� � � - ��� �- �� � �
.___---_. __-__.; . ._.__-____ -___.._._�..
_._T-. 1 ._.�__... __.- _ _
5 856.00
Task Total 2 � 704 0 ' 0 84 60 16 0 24 � 290 15,656 20,566 4,697 S 41,794.30
Task 13-Util' Coordination
13.1 lkilRy LeHers and CoMad Matrix , 0 2 '. 0 0 � 4 16 �� 0 �� 0 0 22��� 1,065'. 1,401��� 320 $ 2J85.81
__._ ..__... , _ . .____ ' . ____-.__. - _. ; ___.. _. ___ - __. . ._ . .._-_... _ -___-
73.2 LttilRy Conllid Plan �0 8 0 0 8 40 � 16 � 0 0 72 � 3,197 � 4,204 �� 959 E 8,35973
___ . --__._ ___. �-__. _ - __.._ _ .__-_- _. ___ .... .-_-- __.-_-_- ._,__ _-... ____..
13.3 Meetings with lhe Ultlilies(4 meetings) 0 ' 8 0 '�, 0 16 24 0 0 0 48 2,511'� 3 301'. 753 S 6,565.07
Reimbursable e enses-see breaktlown for details � ' � S 214.00
7ask ToWI 0 18 0 � 0 28 80 16 0 0 142 6,773 8,906 2,032',S 17,924.61
Task 74-Storm,Water,Waatewater
14.1 Review Existing Facilities,TDA's,Core Requirements � 0 � 2 � 0 0 � 16 24 � 0 0 0 42 2,124 2,793 637 S 5,5S1.36
142 StormwaterManagementRequirements 0 '��. 2 0 0 24 64 � 36 � 0 0 126 5,379�.. 7,072 1,614 y 14,064.61
...__._ _�_. __.. _.._- _. _ ._.-. _ _�._.. .___. __�_- _ _. .__. _._. -.. - .__ . : _.__. ___._.
14.3 Design Calculation and Sizing 0 2 0 0 10 32 10 0 0 54 �2,406� 3 164I 722 S 6,29270
___. . . _ • . _ __. _ .� _ - _._____. .
14.4 DreR TIR 0 8 0 �� 0 32 56 32 0 8 13fi�. 6.021� 7,916�i. 1,806 5 15,743.16
14.5 RewewWaterFacililiesandMeetwithStaH(iMeefing) .. 0 __. 4 ._0_ ___ 0 ��, _ 16 __ ___ i6 .. . 0_ : 0 . _. _0 36'� 1,g03'�� 2,502���� 571 S 4,975.63
14.6 ReNew Wastewater FacilAies arM Meet with SYaH(1 Meeting) � 0 4 0 0 16 i6 0 �_ 0 0 . 3fi __.1 903 2,502� 571 5 4,975.63
. ____.. _-_. .. _. , . -_._ . _ - .__ __.. ___... +__-_ -.__ . .. - . ..._ . .._._.
Reimbursable e enses-see breakdown for dMails �� �� 5 428.00
Taak Total ' 0 � 22 � 0 '� 0 774 208 ' 76 ' 0 8 430 19,735 25,950 5,921 .S 52,034.37
Task 15-Ri ht of Wa True Cost Estimate
15.1 Sales Research�_ ... . .._ _ .. _..._ .� _.,. Z ._-_�.- ,._ � �..__ �_ . �__.�_�_ . . _�.-_ __�_ _-_ 2�-- 1 216�--_. 1.598. 39 S 336.90
15.2 Estimate Land A uisition � 0 8 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 Z4 769
. _
.��-_.. . .- ___. _ ___.
� � 365 S 3,178.68
15.3 Estimate Appraisal Costs � 0 2 ,_. 0 0 '� 0 . _ _ 0 '� 0_ _��`_0_ 0_ __ 2'�, 129�� 169 39 S 336.90
- __ _ � -_.. _- _ .__ - .. . -_ ___. .__ _.--- ___- _.
_-__.
15 4 Eshmate Tdle Insurence Costs 0 4 0 , 16 r 4 0 � 0 0 � 0 24� 1,248 1,641�� 374 E 3,262.87
15.5 Estimate Rebcation and Negotiation Costs �� � ��0 � �2 � �0 0 � 0 0 ' 0 �� 0 � 4 �� 6 � 2531 332'��.� 76 y� �660.73�
Reimbursable ex enses-see bieakdown for delails ' ' � � � �� �' S 37,064.00
Task Total 0 ��� 18 0 '� 16 4 16 0 0 4 58 2,974 �,910 892 = 44,840.29
Task 16-Linear Conidor Haz Mat Re ort
16.1 Review Previous Reports 0 8 � 0 0 � 0 0 � 0 �� 0 0 8' S75 678 155 E 1,347.61
162 SRe and Dffiabase Review 0 2 0 0 0 0 �� 0 I 0 0 2�� 129� 169� 39 y 336.90
___._.. __._._ _._. . _... .._ T __ . ._-_._._ _ __.... . _ -.__.__. ___ -...
16.3 FieldRecoNWindshielASurvey _ ._ � 0 2 � � 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 2 129��, 169�. 39 5 336.90
-__ .._ -__ _ _._, ... ____ - ; . _ __-_____.. ..._-___ . __- .__.. ._. __. . _
16.4 File Review,Aenal,Data Review �� 0 8 0 � 0 0 0 � � 0 0 0 B 575' 678�. �155 $ 1,347.61
_.- _. ___.-_ .._.___ ._. _ . _- _.;. ___.- '___.. ._.-_-_. ._-- -_. . . .__ -. _ _.__-- ,.�_ - � 169�., 39 5 336.90
16.5 Impacls and MHigalwn Measures 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 129��.
P Po ._ _-___. ._-----..... _ ,--._---�:. ._._____-'`_.. ----.__. ----__. . ___ _ .,---- _.___ .__ ._--_-__.
16.6 Pre are Drafi Re d 0 8 0 D 8 0 0 0 0 161 9881 1,299�� 296 S 2,582.69
__. __-_ - ..__- _.r__ ._ .._._--.. ..-._...
i6 7 Administralion,Coordination and Supervision � _0. _ �� 0 0 �, 0 0 0 0 �.. � 0 0 0�, 0�T � 0 0 S -
--- . .._ ..._. _ _ _•.__ - -_ _.. _ �___. ___._- _ . ___-_ r_.. . _.__. _.__-_____. -__-_.
Reimbursable e enses-see breakdown for tletails � S 19,459.15
Task Total 0 30 � 0 0 '� 8 0 � 0 ' 0 0 38 2,405 3,762 722�.j 25,747.98
City o/Renton
Rainiei Avenue S-S3rd St to NW 3rd PI Page 2 of 7
Supplement 2 KPG
10/03/2017
EXHIBIT D
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Project City of Renton ��^
Rainier Avenue S-S 3rd St to NW Srd PI-Supplement 2 �"�
♦ Arohitecture ♦
10/03/2017 l.andscape Arohiacctunc
• Civil EnBinearing •
Labor Hour Estimate Total Fee
Sr Dsn Engd I Design � '�, ', �, �,,
Senior ��, Project I Survey Project Sr Proj Engr/ W � Engr/ �, . �i. '.
Taak Description Enqineer'�, Manager � Manager Surveyor Senior W Surveyor � LA Tech � Tech Clencal . Direct I, Overheatl �'� Profn �'�,EtFective muMiplier
S 84.13 S 64.42 3 72.84 5 47.12 E 59.05 S 43.77 S 28.65 E 38.70 S 30.96I. Hours , LaborCost �I. 131.49% 30% '� 2.6149
Task 77-Prelimina Geotechnical En ineerin Re ort
17.1 Administretion,CoorUination and Supervision ' 0 0 � 0 �� 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�I, 0 0 $
__.-..__. .__.._ _.__. -_ ___. �___ . .: . _-_ - _-._ ; - .._ -_ ._. ._._._ ___._ ,__---__ ._.__-___..._. _-.. ' __._ .-_...
172 Field6cploration �� �� 0 , 4 0 0 � 0 0 � 0 ��, 0 0 4. 258�, 339 77 S 673.81
._ .____._ __ _ . _ - ,. _ _�--_ .... .___ _.- _-_.. . -_._ �. .- __ _ _ _ ._..____
,...._ - ..__-___,, __- _
77.3 Subsurtace Exploration_. � 0 �� 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0�__ 0 y -
. _ ... .__ -_- -_ _ _ ._-.._ . ._ � ... .-..__ _-__ ___- . ___.__
17.4 �GeotechEngineenng � � � 0 � 0 0 0 � 0 0 �� 0 0 0 0��� 0 0, 0 y� -
. _____ .. _._ -._. . _- _ _.. ..____- ___.. .__-....
17.5 StmcWrelEngineering D 0 '��. 0 0 8 16 � 0 0 0 24� 1,173I 1542�. � 352 $ 3,066.55
__.__. . .--__._. . _._._-.-____ __�___._. . ..-_�-- ___. : ._.._.--:-_-_ ..__._ '�- _.._.-. ___. _..._-- __ .__T__ _:-_...... . ___.
17.6 GeotechRepotl_ . .__ .________..; � .._ -._4-__:_ � _�T_�__. .: 2 . ___.4- ... __�_ '� -._�-.. __.0 -_. 1U. ___557'�. 724� 165 S 1,440.44
___.. . . . .__ ._. ._ _ '_ .
_ _ ___. � . __ . _- ._. _.
17J DesignCoorOination '� 0 ' 4 0 �' 0 ' 2 0 0 0 0 6� 376�'�. 494��. 113 S 982.63
Reimbursable e enses-see breakdown for tletails � ' ' ' � �� � E 84,946.99
Task Total � 0 � 12 0 0 12 20 ' 0 0 0 44 2,357 3,099����. 707 S 97,110.41
Task 18-Environmental Permittin Su oR
18.1 EnvironmentalDocumentationSupport_._ 0 _ _4_ ; 0 � ._ 0_._ 0_. _ ___16 . _0__ :. 32 __0__ _ __. 52: _ _ 2,1%'� 2,888� 659 5 5,743.37
.____. _____-- _. . � -.._ _ . . _ .____.
Reimbursable ex enses-see Dreakdown for dMails ' � � � � � � $ -
Task Total �� 0 4 0 � 0 �� 0 16 � 0 32 0 � 52 2,196� 2,888 659 S 5,743.J7
Task 79•S 2nd St Extension TA and 10%Desi n
19.1 Turning Movement Counts 0 0 0 0_ 0 4 � 0 0 0 4 175'�, 230 53 S 457.82
. ._.._ _...-.. _.__ .._.-_-__ . . _-____. l . .- __ . . ._.__ ___. ...__ .__,_ .-__._ __. ,. ____- i _._--__... .___. ___. .__..
792 7DayCounts � 0 0 � 0� 0 0 2 0 0 0 2�, 88�, 115 26 $ 228.97
19.3 Existinq Contldions Tralflc Anaysis_ . 0 0 , 0 i_ 0 0 34 . 0 .�.. 0 0 34 1,488��,__.._ 7 957��, 446 y 3.891.44
19.4 FutureTrefficMa sis_ .. __ ...... ,__.0 , ... 0 U_..___�.._ , _�._ __..6� ,._ __0- �... � _0__ __ 60 _. 2626 ._. 3453'I _ 788 3 � 6,867.25
_
N _
� . _ - � -- _ __ _ - --
79.5 Channelization Recommendahon � 0 _4_ 0 __ _ 0_. 4 32 0 0 0 40'��. _ 1,895, 2,491��� 568 $ 4,953.98
.__ - -__.___. : .____ -_ ..- _.
19.6 UpAaleliaificMaysisRepotl � ________. . �.. 0 _ _. 8 ____ 0 _..... 0 .._.___0 28.__�16. 4 . __4__ ._._60' 2478'�..___.. 3,258� 743 3 6,479.62
.__-_. _ . . --_ �. _-_- -. -__ .__._
19.7 10%ConceptualDesign_____ � � 0 ��� 8 0 U 24 40 �� 80 24�� 0 176 6,9041 9,078 2,071 5 18,053.69
__... . _.___. --- _ . . __- _- ._ ... ._. _-_-_... _ .. _-._ __. ._-_____._. ___--___... . - ___.. t.. _ _._.______ _ -_ .
Reimbursable e enses-see breaktlown for details � ' � �� � � ' $ 2,253.50
Task Total 0 20 ' 0 � 0 � 28 200 96 � 28 4 376 15,654'� 20,583'� 4,696 S 43,186.20
Task 20-WSDOT Coordination
20.1 WSDOTCoorAination ' 0 � i6 0 � 0 � 24 24 '� 0 0 0 64�. 3,498'��. 4,600� 1,050 $ 9,147.97
20.2 WSDOT Channelaation Plan �� 0 �� 8 0 0 24 40 �� 0 24 4 100 4,736I 6.227 1,421 y 12.384.17
�--. ..:. _._-__ ..._ . .-__-_. ._ __._-_ . _ _ -__. _. ..______. ,--_..__. ..___ -__. ____. .
20.3 WSDOT Project Analysis,80D,Deviations,Turning Movemenls � 0 � 8 0 0 40 60 � 0 8 4 720�� 5,937 7,807� 1,781 E . 15,524.66�
�,__-._._ . - . ._.._ __... ___ .._ -_. .._- __ . , .._ -_.__� _ _-_. _.
20.4 WSDOTSinalPermit 0 !.. i .�___.0 0_.T-_76 _0______ 32 __.___0.___._. 0 .._____49�.,_. 1.926�. _.. 2,533��... 5785 5,036.35
9
._--- -�--.. _. _ .
Reimbursable e enses•see breakdown for tletails � � � �� ' � $ 314.20
7ask Total 0 33 � 0 � 0 ' 704 724 32 ' 32 8 �� 333 16,097� 21,166 4,829 = 42,407.34
Task 21-Illustntive Desi n and Urban Desi n Packa e
21.1 Urban Desiqn Package 6 , 0 0 0 24 24 � 60 0 0 114 4691 6,169�� 1,407 $ 12,26770
.._. _.___ .______ . .. _ . __. . __ ._ . .____.__ ..__.. _ � _.... _-___- ._._...
272� IllustraUve Design Roll_Plot ��0 0 0 0 � � 16 20 40 8 0 84 3,276 � 4 307��. 983 8 8,565.69
____ __._ ______ _-. __ _ . ___._ __... . _____ • --____. __._ ,. . ___..
Reimbursabie e enses-see breakdown for delails � � � �� ' � �, ' $ -
Task Total 6 0 0 ' 0 40 44 100 �� 8 0 198 7,967. 10,476�� 2,390 S 2Q833.59
City o/Renton Pag2 3 of 7
Rainier Avenue S-S3N St to NW 3N PI KPG
Supplement 2 10/03/2017
EXHIBIT D
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Project: City of Renton ���
Rainier Avenue S-S 3rd St to NW 3rd PI-Supplement 2
• Arohitecture ♦
10/03/2017 [.andncspo Archicecture
♦ Civit Enginearing •
Labor Hour EstimaM Total Fee
Sr Dsn Engr/ii Design '�, I ,
Senior I Projecl ��, Survey Project Sr Proj Engr/ W '�, Engd ' �. �� i
Tesk DesCription Engineer��� Manager '��. Manaqer Surveyor SeniorW Surveyor �� LATech �I Tech Clencal ��, Direct �, Overhead '��..� Profit I,EflectivemuMiplier
E 84.13 E 64.42 5 72.84 E 47.12 y 59.05 E 43.77 3 28.65 S 3870 § 30.96'�. Hours �I Labor Cost � 131.49°k I 30% �� 2.6149
Task 22•30Y Desi n
22.1 AccessAltematives . ._..._. . .0__ .....2 . p.._ ....0.. , 3p___... 20 '.T 40 ,. . ..0___ _ _0. .____94��r_. 4040�'�... 1.212 $ 10,56378
22.3 Prelimina ConsiructionPhasin Conce is . ....� ��.� 8 ...24 .+- _0�. �, ._0...���40 40 .. 0..�- �-� 0��.. .�.0 � 112+ ..� 6.332`..�-� 6.326�..� ����� � �
ry 9 P � __ _ __ ___ 496 $ 4,319.08
222 UpdatedCrossSedions . . ___ __ 0 2 0 0 8 24 0 0 0 34 1652�. Z��z, 1,900 y 16,557.34 '��
22.4 AGI Li htin Re o� 0 �..�_ 2_ ':. 0 _��,� 0 - . q_ __12 __60___... .. .0 -.0 -._.. 78 __.__.2,609' 3.431� 763 y 6.823.01
_ 9 9 P ---- - � ---.._ _-__
-- _
---
22.5 UptlateC ROW 0 1 4 � 24 8 32 �0 ���. 0 0 69 3 360�_. 4,418, 1,008 S 8,78528
, . __._ �-._. . _ _. ..__- ..__ . �-_._ . ..._- .
..___. ____-___.. . .-__._ __.-_.. . ....__-__ . ._-_-
22.6 30•/.Design � �� . , .
. .�� - .______ _.._ ___. . ; -_. .. ___'_ . -_. . .�--. _ ._____ �.... ';. - . .._._- -T_ _ �.. _..__- _ _
. _..____. .
CoverSheet 1 �� 0 0 � 0 0 � 1 0 '� 0 � 76 0 17��. 678 6921 203 S � 1,773.56
- . Sheetlndex,5urveyConirolBAlignmentData(1) _.___.._. ___._0 �; . .0.. .._p_. , p_._T__.. � . ...._p___. , p __..�6... p.._____.. 77,. ...._. 678�:. 692�'. 203 S 7.773.56
. __. .., .___-__ .
.LeqendandAbbreviatians(i) 0 ._�.._ 0_ ', 0 �0 , 1 0 0 16 0 17� 678�, � 892� 203 S 1,773.56
,_-___-_. __. __.. .._.-____'. . . _. -__._ . _ ..._.- _.. -_-._ .-___.. _
ExistingCondRions(73) 0 0 '� 0 0 4 0 0 39 � 0 43 ��� 1746�.. 2,295 �524 5 4,564.31
..__. -. _ _._ . ._ __._.. ._. -'-. _- __.-._ ... ._- _ �.�� '.�_..____ � __ _..___ . .___ '__. . 773 E 6,738.39
. ._ _____ �_.-. ___. . - . __..
Roadway Details(2) 0 0 .0 0 4 12 24 4 0 44I 1 604' 2 1091 481 S 4,193.88
oa way_ypica ions 0 0 0 0 4 36 24 2 __ 0 66 2 577 3 388
Sde Preparation Plans(13) �, 0 __.0. �� 0 __0__. . 76__ __ 48 .__. 80 __ 4 . ._ 0._ . 148�'�_ 5,493� 7,222! 7,648 5� 14,362.50
..__. . ._____. _. __. _ ..___.
RoadwayPlans(13) �� 0 0 ��� 0� 0 16 60 106 4 0 786�. 6763, 8,892 2,029 E 17,68378
Roadway Cl Profiles(13) 0 ��, 0 0 I 0 8 52 0 4 _ _0 64� 2,903�'�. 3,817� 877 $ 7,591.68
- . ._._ -. . ____- T_.. . , ....__-_. _.... .___.. _ _i__ . ._-__ .._-___. __.__
DrainagePlans(73) 0 0 0 0 26 73 0 ; . 4__ 0 103 4885�� 6,424�� 1,466 $ 12,774.60
_ _ _. .. _-_ _ __ _._ _- . __-_ ..- _- ._ __- __... ,.. __ ___._., .__. __. .____-
Drainage Details(6) 0 0 0 �� 0 12 32 ' 12 2 0� 58 2,530'� 3,3271 759 S 6,616.85
WaterPlans 13 �,r 0 0 0 ._ 0 26 65_ ���, 0. T_.4_ ._0_ _ _ 95��. 4.535 5963'� 1,361 S 11,858.%
� ) .______._ . .__.-- ._-_. .___ ___ . _ �._.. _ _. ' __- __ -____ . _-....
.__. __ .��-_.. , . _-_'- ..___ .� - __ . � --____. __-__- __... �_..
WastewaterPlans(13) ��. 0 0 � 0 0 _26 �2 ' 0 4 0 102�. 4,8421, 6,366� 7,452 E 12,660.14
_ � ) ._�____- � .. � _. __- _ ____ ..____- _ -_-_._ .. . -- -_- _. _.. __
IlluminationPWns 13 0 �. 0 0 0 20 76 172 2 0 270 77941 10,246� 2,338 $ 20,379.60
__... .. ---.. � .. _ r _ . -- - .___-..
Traffic Signal Plans and Notes(8) 0 � 0 � 0 ' 0 40� 80 56 ' 2 0 �� 178 7 5451 9,g21'�. 2,264 $ 19,730.47
22J 30%Cost Estimate 9 9 .(..)_.. � � __..__.._. . p p� 0..__ _0____. .16_ __48 ;.__ 40 t._ .4 ___ 0_�_ __�108� � 4 347.___ 5715! 1 567 3 13.658.25
_Channel¢ation and Si nin Plans 13 ___ 0 0_ 0_ 0 __ _24 52_ 46 __4_ _ 0 128 _5 223 _ 6 868
. . �.. � 1 304��§ �-�11.365.82
22.8 �DesignReport � 0 24� 0 0 40 40 '� 0 ' 16 8 128'�, -..6.526'�, 8581'` 1.958 y 17.06421
Reimbursable ex enses-see breakdown fot tletails �' � �� ' � � ' S 107.00
Task Total 8 � 55 � 4 24 �' 377 874 602 147 8 2,099 89,339'�� 117,472, 2Q802 t 233,719.79
Task 23-pA/pC
23.1 aPJ�CPIan 0 '� 16 0 � 0 4 0 0 �' 0 0 20'��. 1,267. 1,666�. 380 $ 3,312.87
23.2 QA/QCReviews 34 45 0 0 69 69 0 0 0 21T 12,854 16.902'. 3,856 E 33,611.66
___ ___- ____-_ - ___ _._-. ___. __ . - _ __- __. -___. _ . .__ -__. . ____. .
23.3 QA/QCAudks � � �0 �8 0 0 8 8 0 �0 � 0 24���. 1,338 �� �� 1,759�� 401 $ 3,498.53
.__ - _ - . . __ __-_-_. __- . ___. I _. - � . . , _.._ _._. . __. _____.
Reimbursable e enses-see breakdown for details . � . � $ --��-_
Task Total 34 69 0 0 � 81 77 � 0 0 0 261 15,459 20,327 4,638'�,S 40,423.06
CityofRenton Pag2 4 Of 7
Rainier Avenue S-S3rd St to NW 3M PI KPG
Supplement 2 10/03/2017
EXHIBIT D
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Project: City of Renton ���
Rainier Avenue S-S 3rd St to NW 3rd PI-Supplement 2
• Arohitecture ♦
��/���Z��� i.andncapo Archi�sc[ure
♦ C:ivil Enginearing ♦
Labor Hour Estimate Total Fee
Sr Dsn Engd�. Design ., '��, '��, �,
Senior '��. Project �I, Survey Project Sr Proj Engr/ W Engr/ '', �' ''�. '.
Task Description Engineer � Manager �'�, Manager Surveyor Senior W Surveyor ���. tA Tech � Tech Clerical ', Direct I Overhead � Profit �'�Pffedive muHiplier
5 &4.13 $ 64.42 E 72.84 E 47.12 y 59.05 $ 4377 $ 28.65 S 38J0 S 30.96'�, Hours '� Labor Cosl �. 131.49% 30% '� 2.6149
SUPPLEMENT 2-TOTAL HOURS AND TOTAL ESTIMATEO FEE � SO ' 365 4 � 40 ' 880 1719 940 247 56 � 4721 ' 196613 ' 258526 �� 58984 '�. 5659 765 26
Neison Jason Mike Ron Nandez Kanna Emdy Vonnie Dani �.
Paul Liz Phuong Bryce Karen Terri I
Jan Michael Yaxin �
Kirk John Judy
Ray Blake
Hidemi
Coreen
84.13 64.42 72.84 47.12 64.42 43.27 30.77 39.90 32.21
84.13 54.57 41.35 28.85 37.50 29.71
56.97 46.88 24.97
60.22 45.91 27.88
47.12 30.77
44.59
37.26
avg 84.13 64.42 72.84 47.12 59.05 43.77 28.65 38.70 30.96
Cityo�Renton Pdge 5 of 7
Rainier Avenue S-S3rd St to NW 3N PI KPG
Supplement 2 10/03/2017
EXHIBIT D
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
ProJect: City of Renton u��
i.�v
RaiNer Ave S-S 3rd St to NW 3rd PI-Supplement 2 ♦ AmhiCec[ure •
70/03/2017 �=,a�:,,po nm�,�.�::wn-
♦ cc��i e�e�n�r�ny� ♦
Reimbursable Breakdown
Task 12-Prqect Management for Design Phase 3
Mileage(est.1600 miles x 0.535 cents/mile) $ 856 00
Reproduction $
Task 12-Total S 856 00
Task 13-Utility Coordination
. ___. -- ----... . _. . ._.__.
._ Mileage(est 400 miles x 0 535 cenis/mile). �� - �- �� �� ��--���� �$� �� ��-�� 214.00�
..____ ..._._.. . ____ ___.. .___.
_ Reproduction� �� � ��- �� � - �� -�- $ �� _
.... __. .. _.._. . ._..... -------_..
._.._. ..._ .
7ask13-ToWI S 21400
Task 74-Storm,WaSe�,Wastewater
__.... __.. ____ . ._ ..
Mileage(est 800 miles x 0 535 centslmile) -�-�� - - --�-���- � � �� ��� ��$ 428.00
.__. Reproduction.._. .__ . .. .... . _..._... _..... .__--_.. $ ._._ ....
. ... _... . . _--._. .. . .. .__.... .. _. ___ .
iask 14-Total S 428 00
Task 15-Right of Way True Cost EstimaSe
�---- ___. _.._.. _. ._.__.. .
Mileage(est.400 miles x 0.535 cents/mile) ��� �� � � �- ���� � $ �� ����� 214.00
._. Reproduchon ._ _ _ _. ._._ ..__. ...._... .. . __. .$.._..... ._.
Larson LandCo.... . . _. ._. . ____.. . .__._._.. . ._.. ... . __.._.__. ..$ 36�85000..
Task 15•Total = 37 064 00
Task 16-Linear Corridor Haz Mat Report
Mileage(est.100 miles x 0.535 cents/mile) $ 53 50
__. Repmduction. $
. . . ._____ . _._ ..._. -
GeoEngineers � -�� �� ������
_ . _..._. _..._. ...$_. . 1940565..
Taakt6-Total S 1945975
Task 77-Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report
- ---- -- .._____.
Mileage(est 200 mdes x 0.535 cents/mile) � ����� ���� -� �� �- - $ 107.00
Reproduction ___ .. .._ . . ._. . . _. .... .._ _.__._ g _.. .
Amec Foster Wheeler $ 64 839 99
Task 17-Tohl S 84,946.99
Task 18-EnvironmenWl Permitting Support
. _Mileage ._ .... ___. ..._.. _ .. .. .. . _.___.__ _ . __..... $ ____..
.. Reproduchon. . .._... . __.. . ..._._... .__.. . a . . _..._.. .-
._ .. _ _ __.__ . . . ...._ -
... ._._. . ..__.__._...
__._..._... ...____.... . .
a
Task 18-Total s
Task 19-S 2nd St Extension TA and 70%Design
.Mileage(esf.100 miles x 0.535 centslmile) $ 53.50
_ _—._ . _.____.
Repraduction. .. _. .. _.. . . ..... .. .______. _.g... _._..
IDAX Data-TraKc Counts $ 2 200 00
Task 79-Total S 2,253.50
Task 20-WSDOT Coordination
. Mileage(est.120 miles x 0.535 cents/mile) $ 64.20
_._. ___ ._.
Reproduction(1 Full Size Mylar Plan SeQ__. �-� ��-��� � � � � � �-� ����� �--$� �--�� �� 250.00
_ _ _.. ._ . .. .._. ... . ___._.._..
.._.____.8 . . .._.__.._.
Task 20-Total S 314.20
Task 21-Illustrative Design and Urban Design Package
..__ .. . .__. _ _... . _._... . .._____._ .. ... .. . . _ ... _.. $.._. ___..
Mileage ��--- �-�
ReproduCtion g
$
Task 2�-Tohl s
Task22-30%Design
. Mileage(est 200 miles x 0 535 cents/mile)� ���� ���� ��- ��� - � ��� �-��- $ � 107.00
.. ___ .. .._._..
Reproduc4on . _. . . ..__ . ..._.. _ . g . _._____.
---_ .. . ____. ._.__.__ .. ._.. .. . . ...__ . . __.._.. -
._---.__._$ . . ...__..
Task 22-Total S 107 00
Task 23-QAIQC
__--_.._. .
_.._._....__.
Mileage_ ... . .. . _ ....... . . .. --- .. . ._. _...g . ..
--_. ___ ._._. -
..__._. ___. .._._._
. Reproduction . .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. g .. ...
... .__ _ . _.. . .._._..._ .
..__ __._. ... §-_. ___.. .
Task 29-Total s
TOTAL REIMBURSABLES 5 145,642.84
City of Renton
RainierAvenue S-S3rd St to NW 3rd P/ Page 6 of 7 KPG
Supplement 2 10/03/2017
EXHIBIT D
Employees Title DSC OH(131.49%) Fee(30%) Rate
Nelson Davis QA/QC Manager $84.13 $110.62 $2524 $219.99
Paul Fuesel LA Manager $84.13 $110.62 $25.24 $219.99
Jason Fritzler Project Manager $64.42 $84.71 $19.33 $168.45
Nandez Miller Engineering Lead $64.42 $84.71 $19.33 $168.45
Kirk Smith Stormwater Lead $60.22 $79.1 S $18.07 $157.47
Ray Edralin Stormwater $47.12 $61.96 $14.14 $123.21
Michael Lapham Traffic Analysis Lead $46.88 $61.64 $14.06 $122.59
Jan Ciganik Signal/Illumination/ITS Lead $56.97 $74.91 $17.09 $148.97
Karina Franada Roadway Lead $43.27 $56.90 $12.98 $113.15
Nelle Alexander Utility Lead $41.71 $54.84 $12.51 $109.07
Mike Bowen Survey Lead $72.84 $95.78 $21.85 $190.47
Ron Reichel ROW $47.12 $61.96 $14.14 $123.21
Phil Adams Survey Field $37.98 $49.94 $11.39 $99.31
Karen Weisser Survey Tech $37.50 $49.31 $11.25 $98.06
Chris Johnson Survey Tech $30.77 $40.46 $9.23 $80.46
Elizabeth Gibson Landscape/Irrigation Lead $54.57 $71.75 $16.37 $142.70
Phuong Nguyen Urban Design Lead $41.35 $54.37 $12.41 $108.13
John Davies Traffic Engineer $45.91 $60.37 $13.77 $120.05
Blake Costa Signal/Lighting Engineer $30.77 $40.46 $9.23 $80.46
Hidemi Tsuru Signal/Lighting Engineer $44.59 $58.63 $13.38 $116.60
Emily Logan Roadway Engineer $30.77 $40.46 $9.23 $80.46
Bryce Corrigan Roadway Engineer $28.85 $37.93 $8.66 $75.44
Coreen Schmidt Landscape Arch $37.26 $48.99 $11.18 $97.43
Judy Johnson Landscape Tech $27.88 $36.66 $8.36 $72.90
Yaxin Shi Landscape Tech $24.97 $32.83 $7.49 $65.29
Danielle Winklemann Admin $32.21 $42.35
$9.66 $84.23
Terri Simms Admin $29.71 $39.07 $8.91 $77.69
Michelle Torres Admin $20.43 $26.86 $6.13 $53.42
Vonnie Stockman CAD Tech $39.90 $52.46 $11.97 $104.33
Kelly Manager CAD Tech $50.12 $65.90 $15.04 $131.06
City of Renton
Rainier Avenus S-S3rd Si to NW 3rd PI Page 7 of 7 KPG
Supplement 2 g�2g�2a�6
�
Washington State Transportatfon Building
�,� Departrnent of Transportation 310 Mapie Park Avenue S.E.
P,O.Bax 47300
Olympia,WA 985d4-7300
Lynn Peterson 360-705-7000
Secretary of Transportation 7TY:1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
August 6, 2015
KPG, Inc.
753 - 9`h Avenue N
Seattle,WA 98109-4309
Subject: Acceptance FYE 2014 ICR—Risk Assessment Review
Dear Mr. Jason Fritzler:
Based on Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Risk
Assessment review of your Indirect Cost Rate (ICR), we have accepted your proposed
FYE 2014 ICR of 131.49%. This ICR acceptance is in accordance with 23 CFR 172.7
and must be updated on an annual basis. This rate may be subject to additional review
if considered necessary by WSDOT and will be applicable for:
❑ WSDOT Agreements
� Local Agency Contracts in Washington State only
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with the firm is
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7104 or via
email c�unsult�nt��tes�wsdcat.wa.�Qv.
ards;
���E K K. JONS(7
anager, Consultant Serui s�ffice
EKJ:kal
Acceptance ICR Risk Assessment Review
�►
Washipgtan Sta#+�
�# D�p�rtment of Tr�nsportetion Memorandurn
May 13,2014
TO: Stacie Kelsey,Local Programs
FROM: Martha Roach, Agreemeni Compliance Audit M�tzt�ger
SUBJECT: KPG,Inc. Indirect Cost Rate for fiscal year end Dccember 31,2013.
We have completed our desk review of KPG,Inc.Indirect Cost Rate for the above
referenced fiseal year. The review was completed at the request of WSDOT Nortl�west
Region Local Programs. We reviewed tlie documentation supporting the rate for
compliance with criteria contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulations{FAR),
Subpart 31, Our review included e site visit to the firm.
Based on our review we are issuing this memo.establishing I{PG, Inc. Indirect Cost Rate
for fiscal year ending December 31,2013,at 131.49%of direct labor(rate includes
0.14%Facilities Cost of Capital). KPG,Inc.provided a FHWA Certificate af Finai
Indirect Costs indicating all costs included in the indirect cost rate scl�edule are in
compliance with Federal Acquisition Regulations(FAR), Su6part 31.
Costs billed to ageements will still be subject to uudit of actual costs,based on the tenns
and conditions of the respective agreement.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contraeting with the firm is
responsihle for determining tl�e acceptability of the Indirect Cost Rate.
If you have any questians,feel free to call me at(360) 705-7006 or via email at
COBC�ilriB „_,_1�S�Q�.WA.�OY.
Cc: Steve McKernoy
File
�
�
�
DOT Fom�700-0D8 EF
Ravhod 31pB
Certi�ication of Final Indlrect Costs
Ffrm Name:KPO,ino.
Indlrect Cost Rate Proposal;i3�.49'�0
Date aF Proposal Preparailon(mm/ddlyyyy�:U3l1i/2014 �
Fiscai Period Covered(mm/ddlyyyy to mm/ddlyyyy);O1f01/19 l012J3i1Zo13
1, Ihe underslgned, cert/fy that 1 have revlawed fhe proposal to esfablish hns/indirect cosr ratea
for the flsc8!perlod es specftled sbove and to the 6est of my Icnowledge and be!lef.•
i.)At!costs fncluded fn thls proposal to esfab!!sh fina!lndirect cosf refes are ellow�bfe!n
accordanca with tha cost princlples of Ihe FederalAcquisltlon Regulatlons(FAfiJ ot!ltle 48,
Code of Federal�Reguletlone(CFR),parf 31.
Z) This proposa!doea nof include any cosis whlch are expressly unaltowable urtder the cost
princlpJes of fho FAR of 48 CFR 3i.
All known materlal transac8ons or�venls thaf heve occurred effecting fhe Frm's ownersh/p,
organlzatlon and lndirect cost rates have been dlsalosed.
r �
Slgnature;
Name of Certifying Offictal"(Print}:Nelson �avis
�
Tille: Presldanl
bate of Cerlificetbn(mmlddlyyyy):06/12l2014
"The"Certlfying Oificfal"must be an fndlviduel executive or flnancial officer of the flrm at e level +
no lower then a Vlce President or Chie(Flnanclal0fflcer,or equivalenl,who has the authorliy to
represent the finencial Informailon uilllxed!o establlsh lhe indire�t cost rete for use under Agency
contracls. i
Ref.FHWA DlrecUve 4470.1A avallable on line at; �
�ttta:!/www.lhwa.dai.aov,(�gg�re.qsj�,l�eativeslor�r�/44701a,#�trn ;
. t
f
N
f
O/H Certification;Nov 241 Q �
�
KPG,Inc.
Indircct Cost Rate Scl�edule
[�'or tlae YeAr Encled December 31,2Q13
Financ(wl
St�fement Accepied
Deacri Ilon Amount T(pGp ', WSDO'['AdJ. �e; Amount °/,
DirectLabor �2�795,9&9 $ll,000 A S3t10G,987 lOD,00%
��
Indireet Cosu:
FrinBo UeneOte
Vaoarion Poy 5280,66G i1,719 H 5282,384 9.39%
Sick Yay I 18,058 191 C 318,2A9 3.93%
}ioliday Pny 177,603 334 D 178,137 5,92%
Pnyroll Taxcs 450,022 450,022 t497%
kcalth Lisuranca 280,484 280,48A 9,33g'a
Worlcers'Comp.]nsurance 9,344 9,344 0.31°/a
ProfitSlinring(AOl•k) 2R,hUfi 28,GOG 09596
BOf1U6 ��S��S� (5�75,�$�} � � �,��/o
Gommular pesscs �3��J3q 3,930 0.13Y.
Tufnl Fringo F3enefils 31,323,765 S1,AA3 (St'75,QS0) 51,351,159 44.93Ya
Ceneml Ovenc�aA
Lid'uecl Lebur 5986,393 S28,770 8 E1,U15,163 33.76%
Bid&Proposel Labor 302,427 302,427 10.06%
Basineas Licanaes 2,017 2,017 O.D7%
Lifaliu�rcwica(KcyPerxon) ]8,593 (18,593) F (47 O,UO�Io
Disa6ilityincomeProteation 53,620 53,G20 I.78%
AatoAllowancea 46,961 (S4b,981) P 0 0,00%
Professiunal Dovelupment 17,690 (708) Q 1G,982 0,56%
Profcssional Rc�iahation.v 5,425 (355) R 5,0T0 0.17%
Employee Welfare 38,868 (21,429) (3,B3�) G,S 13,623 0.45%
liacruilment 832 (832) H 0 0.00%
(h�faidc Temp Servivas 2,052 2,052 0.07%
PeyroU Sorvices 2,741 2,741 0,09%
Rcnt 547,488 (331,47]) 1 2i6,017 �,18°�
Oli Glies 39,005 37,005 1,23%
Janitor 28,990 28,990 0,96%
RopaiTs&Meintenance 70,173 70,113 2.33%
1T Repeirs&Maintenenae 4,790 �,790 0,16Yo
l.ense Expanae SGA SG4 0,02Yo
OfliceSi�ppHea 93,852 (2,948) T 90,904 3.02�
Copior&P1oHcr Suppliea 13,G60 13,660 0.43%
17'Compuler Supplies 13,9G2 13,962 0.4G°h
PrintingecReproductian (1,842) (1,842) -D,06�
Atblitmtions 2,404 2,404 0.08°h
Memborships&Organirations ]3,465 (3,160) U 10,305 034%
AcoounlingkLcgo) 10,896 (9,125) .i 1,771 OA6°/.
BankChurge 1,004 1,004 0.03%
LateChnrges 36 (]b) K (0) O,DO%
'felecamntmtcationa 112,323 112,323 3.74%
Postago&AelivCry � 4,330 A 33D 0.14°h
TT Lesae Expensn 100,892 100,892 336%
Autu Maintqnuncc&Registralion 2T,410 (27,410) V (0) 0,00°�
Parking&Tolls 12,878 12,878 0,43%
Trava! 10,518 (1,145) W 9,372 D.31°rG
Meals 43,194 (43,194) X 0 0.00'Yu
Business Inenrancc 89,151 87,15t 2.90°h
Lrterest 11,4fi8 (11,4G6) Y 0 O,Op%
AusincasTaxex 231,073 231,U73 7,68°/a
Merketing Reprnduulirni 232 (232) L 0 O.00Ya
Websile Developmant&Maintenance 1,900 1,900 0.06°k
Businoss Failaiainme�it 3,303 {3,303) M 0 0,00°h
CoaFucncxs 15,974 (600) Z l5,174 0.50%
MarketingTrovcl 1,114 (],114) L 0 0,60°/u
Markat(ng Mee{s 8,084 (8,D84) L U 0,00%
PaliUcal CmttributionsJPublic Rclnlions 6,000 (G,000) L 0 0.00°!0
Chnritxl�lo Donetious 4,994 (4,994} N 0 0.00%
KPG,Ina
Indlrect Cost Ratc Schedule
Fur the Year Endecl Aecember 31,2013
ftnaacial
3fxkaia�f Accepted
Aescrl�tloa Amount i(pC AdJ. WSOOT AdJ. {�p, Amounf "/.
1)aproaialton l20,171 12A,i71 A.8t190
'fahlGeneralOvcnc�»d S3�i1G,9t2 fJ?b,A41 E3tdf,N08) 1,5 ,6155 IK�A29:
Tohl Indtrect Cosfs&Over6ted .64 .6T7 f373 9h$ fySJ)6,856} "��_, ,�), }.— 3t.35
fndircctCnxfitxte(1.easFCC) lS�k.9p"/o idl,$�"Yo 13t.3!"�4
...��
FucilitiesCostofCnpittJ f4,13U S4I30 0.T4%
S�4,Gd4,807 (537�,�8} {S3tG.$SCr) S3�l� ,952
Tndirect Cnst Rutc(Includcs FCC) 13l.#?'!o
.�.�.
XPG,lne.-Revlewe0 and Accep�erl BS S/l.i/101�
'7ndlreN Cns!Rn1e sfll!su6fecl ro IYCDOT Ai�dit"
EXHIBIT E SUB CONSULTANT COST COMPUTATION
EXHIBIT G1 - SUMMARY OF COSTS
Geotechnical Study
Rainier Avenue South Phase 4 - Supplement 1 afT12C
Renton, Washington f OSt2f
whee(er
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
QIRECT SALARY COST(DSC):
Task Classification AMEC Class Code Hours x Hourly Rate - Cost Task Total
Principal Geotechnical Engineer(624 to 625) 9 $72.63 $653.67
Associate Engineer(620 to 623) 115 $66.85 $7,687.75
Senior GeologisU Engineer(616 to 619) 137 $44.40 $6,082.80
Project Geologist/Engineer(614 to 615) 26 $39.57 $1,028.82
Staff Geologist/Engineer(611 to 613) 81 $32.10 $2,600.10
CAD Drafter(517) 32 $31.52 $1,008.64
ClericaU Word Processor{808 to 849) 38 $26.06 $990.28
TOTAL DSC 438 $20,052.06
OVERHEAD COST(OH COST-including salary additives):
OH Rate of 1.60 x DSC 1.6 x $20,052.06 = $32,083.30
FIXED FEE(FF):
FF Rate of 0.31 x(DSC) 0.31 x $20,052.06 = $6,216.14
REIMBURSABLES:
Field Expenses(mileage,equipment,etc.) $717.50
Subcontract Expenses(0%mark-up) $25,771.00
TOTAL REIMBURSABLES -. $26,488.50
TOTAL $84,839.99
EXHIBIT E SUB CONSULTANT COST COMPUTATION
Level of Effort Hours Estimate
Suppiement 1 Personnel and Maximum Nau Rates Per Cate ory
+�.,.,'
� "r�� "�Q .`-O � `�fl h �`'� tiv �0 ,.��` � Q��O
��.. .�C+� cy� _Pt tL� ��.� O�'rb� Gl '�' � Q� Cl
a m e c Q'� c � .� a ti -. o �-� � � -� .�''ra �� � �
foster � � � � � � , � � � � 4 ��,-� � ., . �,-�
��� ti � � ti r� � � c� � � � .. � � o
Q`, �. �m sc y� ��, �o o` �m �a � �a°' � �c°'m c� Q'- �i �y`�as
. wheeler ��,�� �,�� ���'�,�� Q��w�� ��w� ��° �'Q�& ey�ask
Tas1t T� $7263 $6fi.85 544.40 539,57 �32.10 S31 S2 326.06 hours
17.1 Contract Administration
Contracl and subcontract setup 1 6 � �4 �4 6� 2?
I nvoicin 8 g �g ,
Projecl mana ement 1 16 g pg ���
17.2 Field Pre aretion
Traffic Cont�of Plans,Apply tor Street Use Permft.Satet 4 8 12 4 p�
Mark exploration locations for u1ilRy locate 8 g q 20
0
17.3 Subsurface Ex loration
Monitor and I up to 20 borin s 5 25 25 55
Laborato testin of sam les 2 4 4 10
Prepare geologic logs and profile 8 12 6 26
17.4 Geotechnical En ineerin
Pole toundations 2 8 8 � 4 2 p4
Utiiit trenchin and backfill 2 4 6
Stormwater intiltration 2 6 8
Non-roadway pavemeni 4 a
Retainin walis 4 4 12 Zp
17.5 Structural En ineerin
Pole foundation en ineerin 2 8 16 ps
Prepare plan sheet 1 8 t�i 8 33
Reiainin wall 4 9 q �g
17.6 Re ortin
Draft report 2 16 is 8 8 a 8 62
Respond to review comments 4 2 2 g
Firai reDort 4 4 g 1q
17J Meetin s
Meetin s with KPG and City i4 16 �g
total hours per category 9 115 137 26 81 32 38 438
DSC{Direct Salary Cost) $ 654 $ 7,688 $ 6,083 $ 1,029 $ 2,600 $ 1,009 $ 990 $ 20,052
OH=DSC X 1.600 $ 7,046 $ 12,300 $ 9,732 $ 1,646 $ 4,160 $ 1,614 $ 1,584 $ 32,083
FF=0.31 X(DSC) $ 203 $ 2,383 $ 1,886 $ 319 $ $06 $ 313 $ 307 $ 6,216
Total burdened labor $ 1,902 $ 22,371 $ 17,701 $ 2,994 $ 7,566 $ 2,935 $ 2,882 $ 58,351
Subtotal AMEC Expenses $ 7�g
Subtotal Subcontract Expenses $ 25�777 .
0%markup g .
TOTAL ODCs $ 26,489
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE $84,839.99
EXHIBIT E SUB CONSULTANT COST COMPUTATION
Other Direct Costs
amec
�oster :
wheeler
Breakdown of Expenses
AmecFW Expenses
E�iense Nem Qusntiiy Unit Unit Cost Total
Mileage 500 fNiles $0.535'__....._��6$
Hand borinq equipmar�t 4 Day $100.000 $4QQ
Field Suppties 1 E3ch �5p.00 $5Q
Subtotaf AMEC�xper�ses ,�7�8
SubcontractLaboratory Expenses
Expense item C}uantity Unit Unit Cost Totaf
Sieve 15 Each $10Q $1,500.0�
200 Wash 0 Each $55 $0.00
Moisture 30 Each $20 $fi00,00
Subtata!taboralary Expenses $2 1 DO
Subcontract Private tllility Lxate{APS)
Expense Item Ouan6tY Unit Unit Cost Totai
Labor 12 hours $80 $960.00
Subtotal Private Locate Expenses $960
Subcontract Traffic Control Plans�Kenny's Traffic Control Plans)
Expense Item Quantiry Unit Unit Cost Total
Labor 12 hours $100 $1,200
Subtotal Traffic Controd Plan Expertses $f,2th?
Subcontract Traffic Control Services(Emerald City Flagginq)
Expense Item Quantily Unit Unit Cost Total
Mobilization 5 day $25 ��$125
Barrier TruCk 2 dByS $500 $t,Ot�O
Siflr�age 9 each $�t $98
Cones 700 each $4,75 $75
Arrowboards 5 day $1Q0 $500
EquipmeM Truck 5 day $75 �375
Flaggers 80 hour $55 $4,440
Subtotal Traffic ConCrol Service�xpflnses ,56,51 t
Subcontract 13 Hollow Stem Auger Drilling(Geolo ic Drill,Inc.�
E�enso Item Quantity Unit Unit Gost Total
Drilltirtg 1 each $15,OU0 $15.qUQ
St�btaial0riliin�E�ense& � $f5.000
Subtotal AmecFW Expenses $71g
Subtotal Subcontraci Expenses $25,771
0%rnark-u on subcontract ex enses $p .
'FaEa4 Othet Direct Cosis $2b,489
10/3/2017 a.;���rw���u,��Eb���� =3�,����f � _: ok�,tF•r�,�=dsx
EXHIBIT E SUB CONSULTANT COST COMPUTATION
EXHIBIT G-2 Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
ACTUALS NOT TO EXCEED TABLE
Rainier Avenue S Phese 4
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment&Infrastructure,Ina
11810 North Creek Parkway North C���C
Bothell,Washington 98011 �(�r�.���-
Prepared 2125/2016 w������
Fates Valid ihrough 72/31/2016
Current Rates Overhead Fee eilii Rete
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Base Direct Lebor 160.00°k 31.00% Billin Rate=nirect
lass Code Class Code Descri tion Rate Rate OH OH Fee Fee Rate Rate
�rt; ,'��P'R >� L�1f�ts$ _
601 Professional Level 1 $11.00 $71.72 $17,60 $18J5 $3.41 $3.63 $32.01 $34.11
602 Professionai Level 2 $11.73 $13.28 $18.77 $21.25 $364 $4.72 $34.13 $3B.64
603 Protessionai Level 3 $13.29 $14.64 $21.28 $2374 $4.12 $4.60 $36.67 $43.18
604 Prolessional Level 4 $14.85 $76.41 $23.76 $26,26 $4.60 $5A9 $43.21 $47,75
605 Protessional Level 5 $16.42 $17.97 $26.27 $28.75 $5.09 $5.57 $4I.78 $5229
606 Professional Leve!6 $17.98 $19.53 $28J7 §3125 $5.57 $6.05 $52.32 $56.83
607 Professional Level 7 $19.54 $21.09 $3L26 $33.74 $6.06 $6.54 $56.86 $61.37
608 Professional Level 8 $21.10 $22.66 $33.76 $36.26 $6.54 $7A2 $61.40 $65.94
609 Professional Levei 9 $22.67 $24.22 $36.27 $38J5 $7 03 S7.51 $65.97 $70 48
610 Professional Level 10 $24.23 $25.78 $38.77 $41.25 $7,51 $Z99 $70.5t $75.02
611 Professional Level 11 $25.79 $28:28 $41.28 $45.25 �7.99 $8.77 $75.05 $8229
612 Professional Level 12 $28.29 $31.25 $45.26 $50.00 $8,77 $9.69 $82.32 $90.94
613 Professionai Level 13 $3126 $34.32 $50.02 $54.91 $9.69 $t0.64 $90 97 $99.87
614 Professional Level 14 $34.33 $37.30 $54.93 $59,68 $10.64 $11.56 $99.90 $108.54
615 Professionai Level 15 $37.31 $40.50 553.70 $64.80 $11.57 $12.56 $108.57 $117.86
616 Professionai Level 16 $40,51 $43.55 $64,82 $69.68 $12.56 $13.50 $117.88 $126J3
617 Protessional Level 17 $43.56 $47.19 $69.70 $75,50 $13,50 $14,63 $126.76 $137.32
618 Professional Level 18 $47.20 $50J0 $75.52 $81.12 $14.63 $15J2 $137.35 $t47.54
619 Professional Levef 19 $50.71 $54.21 $81.14 $86,74 $15.72 $16 81 $147.57 $157.75
620 Professional Level 20 $54,22 $5772 $86.75 $92,35 $t6.81 $1Z89 $157.78 $167.97
621 Prafessionai Level2l $57.73 $61.23 $92.37 $87.97 $17.90 $18,98 $167.99 $178.18
622 Professionai Level 22 $61.24 $64.74 $9'7.98 $103.58 $18.98 $20.07 $178.21 $188.39
623 Pro(essionai Level 23 $64.75 $68,25 $103.60 $109.20 $20.07 $21.16 $188.42 $198.61
624 Pro(essionalLevel24 $68.26 $71e76 $10922 $114.82 $21.16 $22,25 $198.64 $205.82
625 Professio�aiLevel25 $71J7 $75.27 $114.83 $120.43 $22.25 $23.33 $208.85 $219.04
626 Professionai Level 26 $75.28 $145.00 $120.45 $232.00 $23.34 $44.95 $219.06 $421.95
"�' 1�: =�.�:V�t:�.,>; - '`
501 Technician�evel 1 $8.00 $8.00 $12.80 $12,B0 $2.48 $2 48 $23.28 $23.28
502 Technician Level 2 $8.01 $8.90 $12.82 $14,24 $2.48 $2.76 $23.31 $25.90
503 Technician�evel 3 $8.91 $9.80 $14.26 $15.68 $2,76 $3.04 $25.93 $28.52
504 Technician Levei 4 $9.81 $10.70 $15.70 $17:12 $3.04 $3.32 $28.55 $31.14
505 Technician Levei 5 $10J1 $11.60 $17.74 $18.56 $3.32 $3,60 $31.17 $33J6
506 Technician Level 6 $11.61 $12.50 $18.58 $20.00 $3.60 $3.88 $33 79 $36.38
507 Technician Level 7 $12.51 $13.50 $20A2 $21,60 $3.$$ $4.19 $36,40 $39.29
508 TechMcian Level 8 $13.51 $14.50 $21.62 $23.20 $4.19 $4.50 $39.31 $G2.7.0
509 Technician Level 9 $14.51 $15.50 $2322 $24.80 $4.50 $4.$1 $4222 $45.11
510 Technician Level 10 $15.51 $17.00 $24.82 $27.20 $4.81 $5.27 $45.13 $49.A7
511 Technician Level 11 $17.01 $78.50 $27.22 $29 60 $5.27 $5.74 $49.50 $53.84
512 Technician Level 12 $18.51 $20.50 $29.62 $32.80 $5.74 $6.36 $53 86 $59.66
513 Technician Level 13 $20.51 $23.00 $32.82 $36.80 $6.38 $7 13 $59.6$ $66 93
514 Technician Level 14 $23.01 $25.50 $36.82 $40.80 $7,13 $7.91 $66,96 $7421
515 Technician Level 15 $25.51 $28.00 $40.82 $44.80 $7.91 $8.68 $74.23 $81.48
516 Technician Level 16 $28.Ot $30.50 $44.82 $48.80 $8.68 $9.45 $81.51 $88.76
517 Technician Level 17 $30.51 $33.00 $48.82 $52.80 $9,46 $1G.23 $88.78 $96.03
518 Technician Level 18 $33.01 $40.00 $52.82 $64.00 $10.23 $12.40 $96.06 $110.40
„�`� }.
801 Administrative Level 1 $6.36 $9.17 $70.18 $14.67 $1.97 $2.84 $?8.51 $26.68
802 Administrative�evel 2 $9.18 $10.93 $14.69 $17 a9 $2.85 $3,39 $26.71 $31.81
803 AdministrativeLevel3 $10.94 $12.69 $17.50 $2Q.30 $3.39 $3.93 $31.B4 $3693
804 Administrative Level 4 $12.70 $14.�45 $20 32 $23.12 $3.94 $4.48 $36.96 $42.05
805 Administrative Level 5 $74.46 $16.21 $23.t4 $25.94 $4.48 $5.03 $42.08 $47.17
806 Administraiive Level 6 $1622 $17.97 $25,95 $28.75 $5.03 $5.57 $47.20 $5229
807 Administrative Level 7 $17.98 $20.48 $28.77 $32J7 $5.57 $6.35 $52.32 $59.60
808 Administrative Level 8 $20.49 $23.49 $32.78 $37.58 $6.35 $7.28 $59,63 $68.36
809 Administrative Level 9 $23.50 $26.50 $37,60 $4240 $729 $6,22 $68.39 $77.12
810 Administretive Level 10 $26.51 $50.40 $42 42 $80.00 $8.22 $15.50 $77.14 $145.50
�
Washington State 13 onM p eeP n�ave�a�e s.E.
�,� Department of Transp�cwrtation pp,gox 4730D
Lynn Peterson Oiympia,WA 98504-730o
360-705-1OQ0
Secretary oiTrensportation TTY:1-804-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
AUgLiSt �, ZO 1 S
Amec Foster Wheeler Environment&Infrastructure, Inc.
1105 Lakewood Parkway, Suite 300
Alpharetta, GA 30009
Subject: Acceptance FYE 2014 ICR—Cognizant Review
Dear Eddie Goyne:
We have accepted your firms FYE 2014 Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) of 160.00°/a based
on the "Cognizant Review" from the Georgia Department of Transportation. Your
ICR acceptance is in accordance with 23 CFR 172.7 and must be updated on an annual
basis. This rate will be applicable for:
� WSDOT Agreements
� Local Agency Contracts in Washington State only
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract.
Any other entity contracting with your firm is responsible for determining the
acceptability of the ICR.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7104 or via
email ccznsultartirates(a�wsdat.ura.�c�v.
ds;
...,� E K K. JONSON
��--Mana�er, Consultant Services fice
EKJ:kal
Acceptance ICR Co�,mi�ant Rcvicw
AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT&INFRASTRUCTURE,INC.
Schedule ot Direct Labor,Fringe Benefits,and�eneral Overhead(with Field Rate)Costs
Year Ended December 31,2014
Allocation
Less
Generai Ledger Unallowable Home Office
Account Description Balance Costs FAR Reference Total Proposed Field Office Costs Costs
Direct Labor $ 173,928,0�5 $ • $ 173,928,075 $ 13,174,946 $ 160,753,129
Indirect Costs
Fringe Benefits
Payroil Taxes $ 23,725,655 $ 132,567 31.205-1,31.205-6�"� $ 23,593,088 $ 1,787,162 $ 21,805,926
Holiday,VacaGon,and Sick 34,732,486 • 34,732,486 2,630,965 32,101,521
Group insurance 31,975,662 - 31,975,662 2,422,137 29,553,525
Employee Retirement Contribution 9,966,742 • 9,966,742 754,975 9,211,767
TuiGon Reimbursement 124,348 • 124,348 9,419 114,929
Employee Benefits 3,545,939 500,833 31.205-13�d� 3,045,106 230,fi65 2,814,441
Bonus Provision 2,285,932 417,065 31201-3�°' 1,868,867 141,566 1,727,301
Totai Fringe Benefits $ 106,356,�64 $ 1,050,465 $ 105,306,299 $ 7,976,889 $ 97,329,410
General Ove�head Costs
indirectlabor $ 92,840,084 $ 3,020,809 31.205-1,31.205-6"'�" $ 89,819,275 $ 6,803,755 $ 83,015,520
Professional Memberships-Employee 362,362 - 362,362 27,449 334,913
Seminars&Training 904,075 53,116 31205-1'"� 850,959 64,460 786,499
Employee Relocation 211,007 1fi1,209 31.205-35�'� 49,798 3,772 46,026
Recruiting 1,027,837 - t,027,837 77,858 949,979
Indirect Travel and Entertainment 8,177,968 1,865,389 31.205-46,31.205-14'e11° 6,292,599 476,661 5,815,938
Legal&Professional 13,644,516 1,751,047 31205-27,3L205-47�00°� 11,893,469 900,923 10,992,546
Occupancy 24,270,939 14,003 31.205-36�" 24,256,936 - 24,256,936
Advertising and Promotion 3,314,316 1,164,895 31.205-1�6' 2,149,421 162,817 1,986,604
O�ce Furniture and Supplies 2,004,968 - 2,004,968 144,636 1,860,332
ComputedSoftavare Cosls 14,801,976 • 14,801,976 1,121,241 i3,680,735
Office Equipment Rental&Maintenance 2,992,335 - 2,992,335 - 2,992,335
Depreciation 2,416,862 - 2,416,862 1A,562 2,402,300
Communications 4,489,721 - 4,469,721 214,587 4,275,134
Postage and Shipping 698,543 - 698,543 28,843 669,700
Business and Property Taxes,Fees 8 Permits 987,773 - 31.205-01�°� 987,773 74,823 912,950
Insurance 3,931,420 - 3,931,420 297,803 3,633,617
Bad Debt (217,456) {217,456) 31.205-3°1 • . .
Dues,Memberships,and Subscriptions 937,283 221,425 31.205-03�`� 715,858 54,226 661,632
Gontributions 2,350 2,350 31.205-B°1 . . .
Penalties&Fines 387,874 387,874 31.205-15�'"� - - .
BankCharges 153,180 - 153,180 11,603 141,577
OtherOperating 1,349,118 2,226,761 31.205-26�'� (877,643} {66,481) (811,162)
Amortization 1,378,004 - 1,378,004 104,383 1,273,621
Internal Restructuring 77,994 77,994 3t205.27�°� . • .
Intercomp�y Charges,net 8,330,230 8,330,230 3t201-3,31.205-6°'°0 - . .
Interest (415,7A3) (415,743) 31.205•20�"� - . .
Income Taxes 13,686,825 13,686,825 31.205-41'°' - - .
TotaiGenerelOverhead $ 202,748,381 $ 32,350,728 $ 170,395,653 $ 1D,517,921 $ 159,877,732
TotallndirectCosts $ 309,103,145 $ 33,401,193 $ 275,701,952 $ 18,494,810 $ 257,207,142
Overhead Rates(%o(Direct Labor) 140.38% t 60.00%
See accompanying notes to schedule. 2
AMEC FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENT 8 INFRASTRUCTURE,INC.
Schedule of Direct Labor,Fringe Benefits,and General Overhead(with Field Rate)Costs
Vear Ended December 31,2014
Noles:
H'Fmployer podion oF OASDI lax on unallcwable la4or is disalicwed.
��Labor costs associated with generai pubiic relations,advertising,and other unalbwable activities is disanowetl
k'Compensation abm�e a reasenable Ihreshold is disalbwed
�°'Empfoyee benefl costs related io recreal:cn,enterlainmenl,and other unallowable activities are disallowed
�"'Travel r.osts in excess of maximum per diem-ales in ettect at tl�e lime ot travel are disalla»ed
�� Enterlainment is disaliaund.
��Costs associated with legai setliements in fieu o`litigation are di,allewed
�"'Adve�isinghnarkeling co5ts nW ezpqciily,taietl as allowable are disalbwed
�'� Costs nol generally allocabie to a contract a relaled 1�albwable activilies nt�cessary fur 1he overal!operation ot ttie business are disaUowed
u� Bad debts ansing trom uncollecl;b�accounis are disallowed
�`�Costs of civic and communiry membership,are di,ailowed
��� Contribulions and tlonafans aie disailowed
�'"�Fines and pen211ies 2re disallowed
�"�Interest and other financial costs are disalbwed
�°i Fede�al and slate mcome iaxa,,deferted income t�es,and ta�e credits are disalowed
10�Vntercompany managemenl fees are disa lowed
�v Intemal reorgan¢a5on cests a�e disa�lowed
�'�Unailowable cosLs essoc;ated with empbyee reloca6on
�"Disaflowed cosis asseciated with moving expenses
�u S±ock based compensaticn is unailowable
�°'Provision for bonus!n excess ol 2mounis paid are unaAowable
See accompanying notes to schedule. 3
SUMMARY OF PROJECT COSTS �XHIBIT E SUB CONSUi,TANT COST COMPU?ATION
Project: Rainier Avenue South Phase 4
Owner: City of Renton
Prime: KPG
Subconsultant:GeoEngineers,Inc. Date Prepared: 9/11/17
DIRECT SALARY COST(DSC):
Classification Labor Hours x Direct Rate = Labor Cost
Principal Environmental 18 $72.36 $1,302.48
Associate Environmental 2 $66.66 $133.32
Associaie Geotechnical 0 $59.48 $0.00
Senior Engineer 0 $50.97 $0.00
Senior Scientist 1 10 $40.63 $406.30
Project ScientisU Engineer 1 50 $36.78 $1,839.00
Staff Engineer 3 0 $26.25 $0.00
StaN Engineer 2 0 $32.75 $0.00
GIS 8 $26.25 $210.00
CAD Designer 4 $24.75 $99.00
Admin 3 14 $27.41 $383.74
Admin.2 16 $26.59 $425.44
SUBTOTAL-DSC 122 $4,7gg.pg
Total DSC $4,799.28
OVERHEAD(OH COST-including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC 212.32% x $4,799.28 = $10,189.83
FIXED FEE(FF)
FF Rate x DSC 30.0% x $4,799.28 _ $1,439.78
GEOENGINEERS Labor Subtotal g�s,428.90
OTHER DIRECT COSTS(ODCs):
Mileage 50 miles� $0.535 per mile $26.75
Copies 1,000 each C� $0.10 per each $100.00
Parking 0 each� $20.00 per each $0.00
GPS Unit 0 each� $50.00 per each $0.00
Field Supplies 0 each C $30.00 per each $0.00
EDR Radius Map Report Data Package 1 each @ $1,200.00 per each $1,200.00
EDRHistorical Aerial and City Directory
Search for Corridor 1 each� $1,500.00 per day $1,500.00
Ecologyand Archives File Copies 1 each C� $150.00 per day $150.00
GT Laboratory Tests 0 each� $2,800.00 total $0.00
Subontractor:APS 0 each� $6,000.00 total $0.00
Subcontractor:National Barricade 0 each� $400.00 total $0.00
Subcontractor:NW Excavating 0 each� $15,000.00 toial $0.00
Subcontractor:Geologic Drill 0 each� $50,309.00 total $0.00
Subconsultant:Infiltralion Tests 0 each� $11,000.00 total $0.00
�oaging u eacn� �i iu.uu per eacn �u.w
Analytical Laboratory Tests 0 each @ $1,000.00 per each $0.00
SUBTOTAL-ODCs $2,976.75
GEOENGINEERS SUBTOTAL S�s,ao5.s5
GRAND TOTAL -ESTIMATED FEE: a19,405.65
EXHIBIT E SUC�CONSULTANT CC�S"I�C0�IYUTATIO`J
LABOR DETAIL•CPFF-DRAFT
LOE-Labor by Task
Project:Rainier Avenue South Phase 4
Owner:City of Renion
Prime:KPG
Suhconsultant•GeoEngineers,Inc. Date Prepared 9!11%t?
LABORHOURS �
TOTAL DIRECTSALARY
TASK Clessrfic2lion c..ncca! Pscnr;a-e ss..�_'e �nin- ..e•^- �-r_ .f�__�:��� Si=" S�.att :A� LABOH COST
5��r_.�me2'B� Env'Jna�eNa° „e.i«,n=.�� E..x,FEr _wco.a=' E E . .ri.�� GS '�:P�i�.ac' A6:�nm3 N�;rir�.2 HOURS
S212ry Ret¢ 37�3ti i65.oE 3.;5 4P ..=0 ai 3;0 E3 g3E>a A�ti 25 �..<^75 SJn 25 f2n75 c27 y' :�?;yf
..,��=`��a." ��s `�': F: .,�-.�s '� `;-- �` �" , „'�,, . ���.,:- '�. � $ �� � � =�� ':� '.:Q - �'�.
Hazerdous Materiels Discipline HepoA
.t NeYiew Raviou6 fll�Mrta t 4 5 $219
.. .. .... . . . . 4
_.2 SibSdMniqglReguletoryDatabeee9tady 4 � s147
a
_,3 F'�eld RkonroissBnCt 8 8 �,125
8
.A �ile Reviaw,Axial Wtob Aeview,DNa Varidalion 2 14 16 �596
E
_ : 4
2 4
_.6 �e anQ Miligetion f1lnuroS .. � . . . . . t . . .. 4 5 5219
. .. ... ... } A
:6 NKArtlOUS Netwi�l6 MYletigBlbn RlpM 8 2 24 8 4 B /2 66 52,102
� ... .. �.�.-- 8 2 24 8 4 d 12
�7 Adminiatratbn,Coordinetbn and Sup�rcision 8 6� 4 18. � t�0
. . ,.. � � ... . .. - . ... . . . . ... ..... ... B 6 t
_: - ,. ; � r r �. s," � � , -$ � 16 'J6 Q ' Q �;: A �i �� '.7i. �24 �#-; .
. ..�.:..- , - _,..� ,�m�". � � t
Labor Cost S4.'99
Subtctal �1.79g
OverheadCOSI 4� ?1232"0 $70.tyG
FiMed Fee as Ferc?ntege o'DRect Labar aq pp�, gt Aa(I
Oiher Direct Gos�s �2�7?
TQTpt FSTIA9ATFD FEE= 519,406
�►
Washington State Transportation Bu(Iding
�� Department of Tiransportation 310 Maple Park Avenue S.E.
P.O.Box 47300
Olympia,WA 98504-7300
360-705-7000
TTY:1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot,wa.gov
May 17, 2017
GeoEngineers,Inc.
8410 154`f'Avenue NE
Redmond, WA 98052
Subject: Acceptance FYE 2016 ICR—Audit Office Review
Dear Mr. McGranahan:
Transmitted hei•ewith is the WSDOT Audit Office's memo of "Acceptance" of your
firm's FYE 2016 Indirect Cost Rate {ICR} of 212.32%. This rate will be applicable for
WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only. This rate may
be subject to additional review if considered necessary hy WSDOT. Yow�ICR must be
updated on an annual basis.
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the i•espective agreement/contract.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with your firm is
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR.
If you have any questions,feel free to contact our office at (360)705-7U19 or via email
CbItSUI 1c111I1'#1CCS C�WStIOL.w7.�*ov.
Regards;
� A Jonson,Erik
f�'`.``f�"�
cosign
ERIK K. JONSON
Manager,Consultant Services Office
EKJ:kms
Acceplance iCR Audit Oftice Revie�v
GEOENGINEERS,INC.
Indirect Cost Rate Schedule
For the Year Ended December 3l,2016
Cinencial
Statement Geoi:nginccrs Arccptcd
Dcscription Amoimt Adiuscmrnts Ref. Amount %
Dircct Lebor 13,294,117 13,294,117 100%
Indirect Costs:
Tringe Benet'its
PayrollTaxes $2,161,128 ($83,20J) A $2,077,927 15.63%
Group]nsurance 3,449,513 0 3,449,513 25.95%
Worker's Compensation 149,(l3 0 149,613 1.13%
Vacation,Holiday and Sick Pay 3,316,401 0 3,316,401 24.95%
Profit Sl�aring and 401(k)Contributions 844,33R 0 844,338 6.35%
Bonuses and Severance 2,244,975 (388,G�Sa D 1,856,284 13.96%
Tntal Fringc Bcncfits $12,165,968 ($�t7E,��)2} $J 1,694,07G 87.9G%
General Overhead
Non-Billable Labor $7,566,313 ($2,099,245) CC $5,467,068 41.12%
Bid&Proposal Labor 1,192,488 0 ],192,488 8.97%
Direct Seiling Labor 1,944,684 (79Q512) C 1,15A,172 8.68%
Office Rent&Maintenance 2,265,499 (50,429) D 2,215,068 i 6.66%
Telecommunications 2G0,785 0 260,785 19G%
Bus.Taxes&Other than Pederal b83,9G3 0 683,963 5.14%
Subseriptions,Stationery&Strpplies 317,735 (25,002) F 292,733 2.20%
Travel I,083,221 (292,279) F 790,943 5.95%
Company Vehicles 306,171 (306,171) F 0 0.00°/a
Yrofessional Dues,Mectings&Proposats 516,936 (63,246) G 453,690 3.4t%
Depreciation 862,754 (6,685) H 85b,069 6.44%
Equipment Rental&Maintenance 131,38G 0 131,38t 0.99%
Bad Debt 76,000 {76,000) 1 0 0.00%
Professional Constdtants 1,444,562 (941,034) J 503,528 3.79%
EntertainmendAdvertising and Proposals t34,269 (116,030) K 18,239 0.14"/0
Field and Laboratory Supplies 196,692 (48,792) L 147,)00 1.1 I%
Insurance 1,060,098 (42,216) M I,O17,882 7.GG°Jo
ComputerMainteoanceandSoft�vare I,153,083 (5,129) N 1,147,954 8.64%
Recruiting&Refocation 42,112 0 42,112 032%
Contributions 37,20G (37,206) O 0 0.00%
Fines(Penalties/Unallowable 25,183 (25,583) P U 0.00%
Employee Health&WelFare 185,511 (80,204) Q ]05,307 0.79%
Total Gencral O��erLead $21,486,649 ($5,005,3G2) $16,481,287 123.97%
Total Indirect Costs&Overhead $33,652,hl7 ($5,477,254) $28,175,3G3 2ll.94%
Indirect Cosf Rete(Lcss rCCDI) 253.14% 211.94% 211.9d%
Facilities Capital Cost of Money $S t,217 R $51,217 0.39%
($5,426,037) 528,22G,580
Indireet Cost Itate Qncludcs FCCAI) 212.32%
GeoE�igiueers-Accepled bp BC 5/17/17
'7�idirecl Cosl Rale sfiU sr�bjec!!o WSDOT Ae�dit"
Page 1
G�OCNGINEERS,INC.
Iudirect Cost Rate Schedule
Fm�the Year Endeti December 31,2016
Refercnces
GcoCnginecrs Adjustme�ts:
A Fringe benefits adjustment for unalio�veble Direct Seliing labor and unallowable 6onuses per 48 CFR 31201-6(e)(2).
B Unallowable bonuses per A8 CFR 31.205•6{�.
C�, Indirccl(t�bor edjustmeni required,to meet I'SMJ 2016-25th percentile oFDirect Labor(Environmental,Engineering-Prime,Engineering
-Subcoialractor),as a%c�f'tc�tal labor(54.43°/p�,Per A8 CFR 31.201-3
C Unallowable marketing activities per 48 CFR 31.205-1,14,38 and 41.
D Assigned parking costs unallowable per 48 CFR31.201-2&31.201-3;Unallotvable for the benefit of F.mptoyce per 48 CFR 31,201-3.
E Promotional Materials unallo�vable per 48 CFR 31.205-1(f}(5).
F Vehicle costs unallowable per 48 CI'R 31.201-2(d);Travel in excess of Federal per-diem mial{owable per 48 CFR 31.205-4G.
Dues to social clubs unniinn�ubte�cr 48('FR 31.205-1(fl(7),31,205-14;Lo6bying unallo�vable per 48 CFR 31,2t15-22;Aletttbcrships in
�' civic and com�nwiity or�nnir.a£ioric unallo�vc�1 srnd Marketing wsts unallowed per 48 CFR 31.205-1(i�(7)and A8 Ct'it 31.24S-t,14,38,
H Depreciation on vehicles unallowed per 48 CFR 31.201-2(d).
1 Bad debts unallo�vable per 48 CFR 31.205-3.
J Direcl project costs wiatlowable per 48 CP'R 31.202(a);Unallo�vable marketing activities per 48 CPK 31.205-], I4&38;Patent Costs
unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205-30.Volui7tary Unallo�vable Legal Claim &Settlement expenses per 48 CFR 31.205-47(b)and 31.205-
k Unapo��-abte marketing activities per 48 CFR 31.205-1, 14&38;Entertainmenl unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205-14;Advertising
unallo�vable per 48 CFR 31.205-38(b)(I).
L Direct Project Costs unallo�vable per 48 CFR 31.202(a).
M Unallo�+�able key person life insurao4e per 48 CI'R 31.205-19(e)(2)(v).Direct projeG costs unallo�vable per 48 CFR 31.202(a)
N UnT1lo�vaUle Office for the benefil of Employee per 48 CFR 3 I.201-3
O Contributions unallowable per 48 CFR 31.205-8.
P Fines&Penalties unallowable per CFR 3 L205-15(a).
Q Social activilies unallo�vable per 48 CFR 31.205-l4;Employee gifts&recreation unallowablc per 48 CFR 31.205-13(b).
R Cosls of money adjustment Allo�vable per 4R CFR 31.205-]0(a).
Page 2
EXHIBIT E
CONSULTANT RATE SCHEDULE/FEE SUMMARY SHEET
LARSON LAND CO. LLC
PROJECT: KPG/City of Renton/Rainier Avenue S. Phase 4—S. 3rd ST.to NW 5. 3'd PL
2017 RATE SCHEDULE
, Safe Harbor
Raw Indirect
Labor Cost Rate Fee Billing
Classification Rate (110%) (30%) Rate
Project Mgr/Sr. ROW Agent $60.00 $66.00� $18.00 $144.00
Sr. ROW Tech $40.00 $44.00 $12.00 $96.00
FEE SUMMARY
Project Mgr/
Sr. ROW Sr. ROW Total
Role: Agent Tech Labor Total Labor
TASK Bill Rate: $144.00 $96.00 Hours Cost
15.1 Sales Research 60 22 82 $10,752
15.2 Land Acquisition Estimate 80 30 110 $14,400
15.3 Appraisal/Appraisal Review Estimate 10 4 14 $1,824
15.4 Title Insurance
Estimate 10 4 14 $1,8Z4
15.5 Relocation/Negotiation Estimate 40 15 55 $7,200
Totals: 200 75 275 $36,000
TOTAL FEE $36,000.00
EXPENSES
Mileage: 1588 miles @ �
$0.535 $850.00
TOTALEXPENSES $850.00
TOTAL FEES&EXPENSES $36,850.00
�
�� Washington State lYansportatlon Suilding -
t?epartment of'�ransportatFon 310 Maple Park Avenue S.E.
P.O.Box 47300
Ofympia,WA 98504-7300
360-705-7000
TlY: 1-8D0-833-6386
www.wsdot.wa.gov
May 3, 2017
Jay Larson,Principa]
Larson Land Company,LLC
7230 Madroiia Dr.NE
Bainbridge Is,WA 98110-1902
Re: Larson Land Conipany,LLC
Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate
Dear Mr. Larson:
Washington State has received approval from our]ocal Federal Higl�way Administration (FHWA)
Divisia��to continue ad�iinistering the"safe harbar"indirect cost rate pragram on engineering and
desi�;n related service cantracts,as well as for Lt�cal P�blic A�eney projects.
We have completed our risk assessment for Larson Land Company,LLC. We conducted our assessment
based on tl�e documentation provided by the firm. The reviewed data included,but was not liinited to, a
description of tlie company, basis of accounting, accounting system and the basis of indirect costs.
Based on our review, your firm is eligible to use ihe Safe Harbor rate. You have opted to use the Safe
Harbor rate,ratt�er than provide a FAR-compliant raEe at this time.
We are issuing the Safe I-Iarbor Indirect Cost Rate of 110%of direct labor with a field rate,where
applicable,of 80%of direct labor for Larson Land Company. The Safe Harbor rate is effective on May
3,2017.
Larson Land Coinpany has agreed to improve Internal Controls and timekeeping processes in order to be
able to develop an Indirect Cost Rate Schedule in the future in accordance with the Federal Acquisition
Regulations(FAR), Subpart 31. The WSDOT Internal Audit Office has provided�uidance and
inforniation related to FARs and tl�e AASHTO Audit Guide. You may use tlie Safe Harbor Rate of
110%,or$0% for field office situations, for agreements enterod into prior to May 3,2020. For
agreements entered into after ttiis date,please contact the WSDOT Consultant Services Office(CSO)or
our office for guidance.
The Safe Harbor Rate will uot be subject to audit. Please coordinate with CSO or your Local Programs
contact if you l�ave questions about when to apply the Safe Harbor rate to your agreement.
If you have any questions,please contact me,Jeri Sivertson, or Steve McKerney at(360)705-7003.
Sincerely,
� .
�Scl�atzi�i���„,_,..
Agreement Compli Audit Manager
cc: Steve MeKerney,Director of Intemal Audit
Jeri Sivertson,Assistant Director of Internal�ludit
Larry Scho�eld,MS 47323
File
C�RTtFlCATICIN t7F FMAL lNf�1RECT COSTS—FOR A SA�"E HARBOR ENDlRECT C05T RATE
Firm Nnme:��.ta r? '�o t�1 �.�tu� Cn�-r�41�1�� � t,.. �.
!, 11�e undersigrted, cert�thal I have reviewed Ihe proposal 10 establish[he Safe Harbor ra1e.
Tl�e frrm is electing�a r�se�he SflFE HARBUR INDIRECT COST R..�lTE of 110%of direct labor with a
freld rat�, when app/icable, af 80%af direc�labor. To�he besl of my knatiuledge and belief.•
a) Tlie frrm has no!had a FAR complianl indirec!cosl rale prev�ously accepled by any olher s1ale
agency.
b) The firm H+�l1 provide reporls as required by!he SAFE NARBOR RATE program on lheir
progress loward conrpliance with 11re cosl principles of the Federal Acquisition Regulattons
(FA�nf ri[le 48, Code of Federa!Regulations(CFI�,part 31.
All knawn maleria/trartsactions or event.s 1ha1 have occurred a„Q''ecting lhe frrnr's ownershlp, organizalian
and prior¤!indirec�cos�rales have beerr dtsclosed.
Tlfe frrm agrees to follo►v the 'Path to Compliance". Sleps nated below:
The PaiMvoy musl inctude:
• A/Imekeeping sys[e�rr which includes�he lnlernal Conlrvls described In chapler 6 of AASHTU
• An accounlingsystem which separa�es Indrreet cosls and direct cosls
+ A»aecounring syslem which separa�es nllawable and unallowu6/e cost
� A complfunt job cosl syslem which ts genera/ledger driven
+ 71�alning for accvunNng personne!and key management on Parr 3!of rhe Federal Aequfsi�ion R�gulutionz,
Cantrad Casl Prtncip/es and Praeedures
+ A a�rong wrillen in[erna!con�rol policy wlth a nitcy and pracedures manaa!
"Signeture: �
"Name of Certifj+in �cisl(Print): �/.1 +y � _ ��,,.,$��
*Title: �c.,,J l�.?e�1. �'7���i�� A/?'
DnGe aPCertification(mm/dd/yyyy): `�--,�',Q —�'�`
*Note: This form is to bc completed by an individual executive or financial officer of the consultsnt at a
level no lower then a Vice President or Chief Financial Officer,or equivalen�who has the authority to
represent the financiel information utilized to establish the indirect cost rate proposal submitted in
conjun�don with the agreement