No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR-422958rn N N O 0 W I - a z U_ 10' MAX DRIPLINE (VARIES) FENCE LOCATION (LIMITS OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE) RADIUS=1 FOOT PER INCH OF TRUCK DIAMETER I //5'* CR' TREE PROTECTI01 FENCE AT CR ORANGE SAFTEY FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE MENE VARIES 1 1 1A TREI LIMITS 1 111 CHIP MULCH CRITICAL ROOT ZONEDEPTH) DIUS=1 FOOT PER IN14H OF TRUNK DIAMETER WOOD CHIP MULCH 01 AREA (4"-6" DEPTH) *AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE NECESSARY WORK SPACE. IF LESS THAN 5', THEN ADD BOARDS STRAPPED TO TRUNK. TREE PROTECTION FENCE (MODIRED) - ORANGE SAFETY FENCE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. BUILDING A PORTION OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SIGNIFCANTTREE REMOVAL Print Farm Reset Farm Save Form ID # SPECIES HEALTH CONDITION VIABILITY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY--IwpwwwCITY OF 1. SPRUCE FAIR SUBSTANTIAL PORTIONS OF TOP POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT enton REMOVED FOR OVERHEAD UTILITIES 2. PRIVET POOR MIS-SHAPENED, SPARSE GROWTH CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL TREE RETENTION WO R KS H E ET 3. CEDAR FAIR LOCATED NEXT TO BUILDING WALL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING BUILDING Planning division AND WITHIN EASEMENT, CROWDED AND WITH PROPOSAL 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, WA 48057 TO ONE SIDE Phone! 425-430-720+0 1 www,rentonwa.gov 4. CEDAR FAIR LOCATED NEXT TO BUILDING WALL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING BUILDING Revised July 20, 2022 AND WITHIN EASEMENT, CROWDED AND WITH PROPOSAL 1. Total number of trees over 6" diameter', or alder or cottonwood 5. FIR POOR LOCATED NEXT TO BUILDING WALL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING BUILDING AND WITHIN EASEMENT, CROWDED AND WITH PROPOSAL trees at least 8" in diameter on project site 2L0..j trees 6. CEDAR FAIR LOCATED NEXT TO BUILDING WALL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING BUILDING 2, Deductions: Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation: AND WITHIN EASEMENT, CROWDED AND WITH PROPOSAL Trees that are dangerous G trees Trees in proposed public streets 0 trees 7. OAK FAIR LOCATED NEXT TO BUILDING WALL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING BUILDING Trees in proposed private access easements/tracts 0 trees AND WITHIN EASEMENT, CROWDED AND WITH PROPOSAL Trees in critical areas' and buffers a trees 8. CRABAPPLE POOR AGED AND DECLINING CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL Total number of excluded trees: D trees 9. OAK FAIR LOCATED NEXT TO BUILDING WALL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING BUILDING 3. Subtract line 2from fine 1, 20 trees AND WITHIN EASEMENT, CROWDED AND WITH PROPOSAL 4, Next, to determine the number of trees that must be retained, multiply line 3 by: 10. CEDAR POOR LOCATED NEXT TO BUILDING WALL CONFLICTS WITH EXISTING BUILDING 0.3 in zones Rio, R-1, R-4, R-6 or R-8 AND WITHIN EASEMENT, CROWDED AND WITH PROPOSAL 0-2 in all other residential zones 0.1 in all commercial and industrial zones 2 trees 11. ATLAS CEDAR POOR DECLINING. CROWDED CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL 5, List the number of 6" in diameter, or alder or cottonwood trees over 8" in diameter that you are proposing5 to retain;; 0 trees 12. PINE GOOD FAIR, CROWDED AREA CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL 6. Subtract fine 5 from line 4 for trees to be replaced: 13. FLOWERING FAIR FAIR, CROWDED AREA, GROWTH CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL (if line 6Is zero orless, stop here_ No replacement trees are required) x trees CHERRY TO ONE SIDE 7. Multiply fine 6 by 12" for number of required replacement inches: 24 inches 14. APPLE FAIR OLD, REQUIRES EXTENSIVE PRUNING CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL S. Proposed size of trees to meet additional planting requirement: 15. CRABAPPLE POOR SPINDLY GROWTH, OLD, ACTUALLY CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL (Minimum z" caliper trees required for replacement, otherwise enter 0) a inches per tree LESS THAN 6" DIAMETER 9. Divide line 7 by line a for number of replacement trees¢: (if remainder is.5 orgreater, round up tothe next whole number} 8 trees 16. CRABAPPLE FAIR OLD, REQUIRES EXTENSIVE PRUNING CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL Add (4) 3' caliper deciduous or 8' high evergreen trees to mitigate Measured at4.5' above grade. loss of 1 Significant tree. 12 total replacement trees are required. 17. CEDAR GOOD STRONG GROWTH HABIT CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL A tree certified, in a written report, as dead, terminally diseased, damaged, or otherwise dangerous to persons or property by a licensed landscape architect, or certified arborist and approved by the City, 18. POPLAR POOR CUT DOWN TO STUMP CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL ' Critical areas, such as wetlands, streams, floodplains and protected slopes, are defined in RMC 4-3-050 . +Count only those trees to be retained outside of critical areas and buffers. ' The City may require modification of the tree retention plan to ensure retention of the maximum number of trees per RMC 4-4-130117d. 19. DOUGLAS FIR GOOD CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL r When the required number of protected trees cannot he retained, replacement trees, with at least a two-inch (2") caliper or an evergreen at least six feet (6) tall, shall be planted. See RMC 4-4-130A.1.e.(ii) for prohibited types of replacement trees. 20 RED MAPLE FAIR TREE HAS BEEN TOPPED CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL 1 H:' CE0\Data\forms-Templatesr,Self-Help Handouts�PlanningdTree Retentian worksheet elmx 00/2015 21. PINE GOOD LOCATED WITHIN EASEMENT, CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSAL CROWDED SIGNIFICANT TREE REQUIRING PROTECTION/AROBORIST MONITORING ID # SPECIES HEALTH CONDITION VIABILITY 22. RED MAPLE GOOD GOOD FORM GOOD 23. VINE MAPLE GOOD MULTI -TRUNK FORM GOOD 24. RED MAPLE GOOD GOOD FORM, LOCATED ON GOOD NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 25. RED MAPLE GOOD GOOD FORM, LOCATED ON GOOD NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 26. RED MAPLE GOOD GOOD FORM, LOCATED ON GOOD NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 27. POPLAR GOOD GOOD FORM, LOCATED ON GOOD NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 28. POPLAR GOOD GOOD FORM, LOCATED ON GOOD NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 29. BLACK LOCUST FAIR CROWDED, OFFSET FORM FAIR LOCATED ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 30. POPLAR GOOD GOOD FORM, LOCATED ON GOOD NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 31. POPLAR GOOD GOOD FORM, LOCATED ON GOOD NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TREE RETENTION AND REPLACEMENT CALCUALTIONS 20 SIGNIFICANT TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED AT THE GMC AND CADILAC SITES. NUMBER OF TREES TO BE RETAINED PER CODE ARE 2 TREES. ONLY 1 SIGNIFICANT TREE IS POSSIBLE TO BE RETAINED, THEREFORE MITIGATION IS REQUIRED FOR A TREE THAT CANNOT BE RETAINED. MITIGATION: (1) 12" CALIPER TREE / 3' CALIPER DECIDUOUS TREE OR 8' HIGH EVERGREEN TREE = 4 ADDITIONAL REPLACEMENT TREES. PER TREE RETENTION WORKSHEET 8 REPLACEMENT TREES ARE REQUIRED. ADD 4 MITIGATION TREES FOR A TOTAL 12 TREES REQUIRED. ONSITE TREE REPLACEMENT AND MITIGATION TREES SHOWN TOTAL 12 TREES. SEVEN (7) 3- CALIPER GINKGO TREES AND FIVE (5) 8' TALL CEDAR TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED AT THE CADILAC SITE. SEE L1.00. CONSTRUCTION RECORD DRAWING PROJECT WAS COMPLETED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. ELEVATION DEVIATIONS, WHERE APPLICABLE, ARE DENOTED WITH PLAN CALLOUT UPDATES, AND A STRIKEOUT THROUGH THE ORIGINAL ELEVATION. UTILITY AS -BUILT INFORMATION OBTAINED BY MCKEE ENTERPRISES AND VERIFIED BY SITTS & HILL ENGINEERS, INC. EIsitts&hill U 1 CIVIL I STRUCTURAL I SURVEY 4815 CENTER STREET I TACOMA, WA. 98409 PHONE: (253) 474-9449 I FAX: (253) 474-0153 http:/Iwww.sittshill.com/ Project No.: 19480 Project Mgr.: DCD Proj. Engineer: DKM/RJJ Proj. Drafter: KLK/DKM R-422958 T_ IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF RENTON STANDARDS SURVEYED: SCALE: DATE: VERTICAL: NAVD 83/1 CITY OF BROTHERTON CADILLAC - RENTON DESIGNED: AS NOTED HORIZONTAL: NAD 1983/1991 DKM/RJJ FIELDB00K: Call 811 °�^W"� KLK/DKM RENTON PAGE: ONE INCH DATU M DRAWING NO: • o two business days CHECKED: DCDIFAT FULL SCALE NOT ONE NCH Planning/Building/Public works Dept. TREE RETENTION NOTES AND DETAILS (PRIVATE) TR 1 .1 before you dig NO. REVISION BY DATE APPR APPROVED:SCALESCALE ACCORDINGLY SHEER 39 OF: 39 N T O O N N ,AIN T H H N N a J i 0 co It 0 0 N N u