Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA80-131 bEGINNINti, 0F FILE FILE TITLE - /L) Lon (\ i\ V • - - /31-- Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. ,6:he y.. ?3(3 being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that he is the Chief Clerk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a Ordinance 3 1 i R6399 as it was published in regular issues(and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of 1., consecutive issues,commencing on the 6 day ofarch ,19 ` ,and ending the day of ,19 ,both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $13 w, which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Chief Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 10 day of March , 19 81 Notary Public in and for the t e of Washington, residing at Maim County. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 7 ., --- f-- --y 7' •�L'A-A"=LEGPIL'U�JI:FiO�'Y iC3N1Crc"{2TRi4NST CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON �..N ZONE PROPERTY TO BE REZOt- D TO.R-3 Teat portion of the plat of Earlington,incluc::.:j streets and t ORDINANCE NO'.3517 : alleys, recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, Page 7 (AF Friday, March 6, 1981 LAN ORDINANCE OF'THE CITY OF-RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLAS- #-433749),Records of King County,Washington,and more i SIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN particularly described as follows: Public Notice Public Notice THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE SING- Commencing'at the.intersection Of the centerline of j i LE FAMILY DISTRICT (R�1) AND. RESIDENCE •Southwest 6th Place (First Avenue) and the southerly WASHINGTON.ASH IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF prolongation of the westerly line of Lot 25,Block 15 Of said • CONTAINING 9 DISTRICT(R-2) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT(R-2) CONTAINING 91,137.51 SQUARE FEET,2.092 ACRES.' Plat,thence N 71°32'09"W along said centerline a distance Exhibit"A" .AND RESIDENCE DISTRICT(R-3)(R-131-80 CHG. .of 150.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence N ASSOCIATES) 18°27'51"E a distance of 138.00 feet to a point of tangency PARCEL "B-B" — LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TAYLOR WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV(Building Regula- with a curve to the right, the center of which bears S ThataOPERTY TOh Bl REZONED FROM R-1 TO Rs ! tions) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code-of 71°32'09"E a radial distance of 150.00 feet;thence alongey , recorded i rd df the P of of aE 14gof Plats, including streets and General Ordinances of the City of Renton"as amended,and said curve to the right through a central angle of 90°00'0 alleys, retarded in Volume of Plats, Page 7 (A.re :G , the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith,the an arc length of 235.62feet to a point of tangency;thence S #433749),cularlrecords of King County,Washington,and more 1; as follows: • property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned . 71°32'09"E a distance of 80.00 feet to a point of tangency p Beginning eat n then interesection of the center"-- of t as Residence Single Family District (R-1) and Residence with a curve to.the right the center of which bears S District(R-2);and 18°27'51"W a radial distance of 150.00 feet;thence along prolonged 6th Place (First Avenue) and,Block the Sc, )d ' WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone • said curve to the right through a central angle of 83°42'41", Plato of prolongation of the westerly 18°27'51"8 of Lot E along the id classification of said property has been filed with the an arc length of 219.16 feet thence N 77°00'24" W A Plat Earlington;thence N u E westerly Planning Department on or about December 17, 1980, distance of 53.64 feet to a point of tangency with a curve to line of said Lot 25 and its southerly and northerly which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for ' the left, the center of,which.bears S 12°59'36"W a radial prolongatione a distancelleyinof said Blocklo feet to a point along said . investigation,study and public hearing,and a public hearing distance of 150.00 feet;thence along said curve to the left centerline of the alley 15;thence p naid having been held thereon on or about January 20,1981,and through a central angle of 41°41'45"'an arc distance of centerlineetinS wi71th the'northerlyE a d pceofgatio feet toanoint lof y said'matter having been.duly considered by the Hearing 109.16 feet to a point,said point being on the easterly line of intersection with prolongation of the easterly Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with Lot 26, Block 15, Plat of Earlington;thence N 18°27'51"E line of Lot 26 in said Block 15; thence along said the City's Comprehensive Plan,,as amended,and the City , along the easterly line of said Lot 26 and its northerly dist�an ce tof 36.02 feet to aand saidenrlonl�tangent point on°a curve to Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, prolongation a distance of 36.02 feet to a point on the r and all parties having been heard appearing in support :centerline of the alley in said Block 15;thence along said the left the center of which bears S 28°42'09" E a radial thereof or in opposition thereof, NOW THEREFORE 'centerline'N 71°32'09"W a distance 80.00 feet to a point arc distane ce 1 of 010 12.14 feet 1;thence throughalong acurve to altangl an I' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, • of intersection with the northerly prolongation of the westerly ' 42 5009 to a point on the centerline of said Southwest 6th WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ' line of Lot 25 of said Block 15; thence along said described roe Place;thence N 71°32'09" W along the centerline of said SECTION I:Thefollowin 9 property rty in the City of prolongation and said westerly line of said Lot 25; S Southwest 6th Place a distance of 40.00 feet to the true point Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District(R-2)and 18°27'51"W a distance of 138.00 feet to a point,said point Residence District(R-3)as hereinbelow specified:subject ' - being the intersection of the centerline of said Southwest 6th ' SITUATE beginning. IN • to the findings, conclusions and decision of the Hearing j . Place and the southerly prolongation of the westerly line of CCONTAI THE COUNTY OF KING,FEET, OF WASH. Examiner dated January 23,1981;the Planning Director is Lot 25,Block 15, Plat of Earlington;thence S 71°32'09"E PARCEL "D-D"ING 8 — LEGAL SQUARE RIPTI N OF ACRES. • hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the along said centerline of Southwest 6th Place a distance of PARCEL — DESCRIPTION TAYLOR Zoning Ordinance,as amended,to evidence said rezoning, 40.00 feet; to a point of the northerly prolongation of the ThPROPERTY lot TO R-2 TRANSITION. to-wit: easterly line of Lot 4 of Block 17 of said plat;thence along ey , portion tif the Plat ofaE 14i4gton plats, including streets and See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part said prolongation and said easterly line of said Lot 4; S alleys, recorded in Volume of plats, Page i hereof as if fully set forth herein 18°27'51" W a distance of 145.34 feet taro point on the #43cularl records of King County,Washington,an e (Said,property being located west of Stevens Avenue northerly right-of-way line of the Pacific Coast Railroad as particularly described as follows: • S.W. at the intersection of S.W.6th Place) Beginning at Placec intersections(FiAvenue)of the centerline of • shown on the main line right-of-way and track map,Pacific. ., Southwest 6th (First and the souther) SECTION II:This Ordinance shall be effective upon its Coast Railroad, Sheet 5 of 11, Volume 2—Washington, d passage, approval and five days after its publication. ' records of the Burlington Northern Railroad;thence along Plat of Eartli gt n;thence on of the along aline of id prolongation anot 26,Block 15, d said l - PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 2nd day of March, ;said northerly right-of-way line N 71°29'12"W a distance of , easterly line of said Lot 26; N 18°27'51" E a distance-of 1981. • a 77.35 feet to a nontangent point on a curve to the right,the 101.98 feet to a point on anon-tangent curve to the left the Delores A. Mead,City Clerk • , center of which bears N 32°53'00" E a radial distance of center of which bears S 28°42'09" E a radial distance of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 2nd day of March, , 150.00 feet; thence along said curve to the right an arc •150.00 feet; thence along said curve to the left an arc , 1981. 'distance o?197.87 feet through a central angle of 75°34'51" ' distance Of 112.14 feet through a central angle of 42°50'09" I Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor-•' to the true point of beginning. to a point on the centerline of said Southwest 6th Place; Approved as to form: thence S 71°32'09"E along the centerline of said Southwest Lawrence J.Warren, City Attorney • - • 6th Place a distance of 40.00 feet to the true point of Exhibit"A:" I beginning. y Ordinance No.3517 - SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF 1 _ R-131-80 -- --- - - WASHINGTON. —i l ' CONTAINING 2,801.39 SQUARE FEET, 0.064 ACRES. ' Published in the Daily Record Chronicle March 6, 1981. r =�� R6399 -. r' p & : ( I3 ,- Renton City Council 3/2/81 Page 3 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued Ordinance #3514 An ordinance was read amending Code of Ordinances relating to Council Salaries salaries of Councilmen, increasing salary from $400 to $550 for future elected officials. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE WAS READ. ROLL CALL 5-AYES: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, REED; ONE-NO: SHANE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3515 An ordinance was read estab.lishing .a fee schedule for Building Building 6 Public Regulations and Public Ways and Property of Code of General Way Fee Ordinances, including plats, PUD, Mobile Home Parks, Environmental Schedule Impact Review, Shoreline Management, Rezone, etc. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5 AYES: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, REED; ONE-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #3516 An ordinance was read (first reading 1/26/81 ) establishing Planned Unit Planned Unit Development Ordinance. The Ways and Means Committee Development reported that the Envionmental Review Committee stated the Declaration of Non-Significance was received on 2/2/81 and the appeal period expired 2/16/81 without appeal . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, PLACE ORDINANCE ON SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE WAS READ. ROLL CALL: 5- AYES: ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER, TRIMM, REED; ONE-NO: SHANE. CARRIED. . Ordinance #3517 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of CF/CHG Associates, property located west of Stevens Ave. SW at the intersection of Joint Venture SW 6th Place; zone change from R-2 and R-2 to R-2 and R-3; known Rezone R-131-80 as the CHG Associates Rezone R-131-80. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BY ROCKHILL, SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE. ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading and referral back to committee of the following ordinances and summaries: First Reading An ordinance was read establishing minimum vacation allowance Vacation to be taken by an employee in one hour increments. Copy of Ordinance letter agreement was furnished between Local 21-R AFSCME and City amending Article VII Section C (Vacations) of the 1981 Labor Agreement. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. LID #321 An ordinance was read ordering construction of LID #321 sanitary sewer main, laterals and side sewers in the vicinity of Duvall Ave. NE and NE Sunset Blvd. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. The Ways and Means Committee recommended reading and adoption of the following resolutions: Resolution #2382 A resolution was read authorizing transfer of $3,469.77 from Fund Transfer Cumulative Reserve Fund 2104 to Park Facilities for purchase of Sprayer John Bean Sprayer. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2383 A resolution was read transferring $8,000 from Unemployment Fund Transfer Compensation/Cumulative Reserve Fund 3278 for unemployment Unemployment 1981 benefit for the year 1981 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Renton City Council 3/2/81 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Shane presented committee report Committee recommending Council concurrence with the Public Works Depart- Eastr ge ment to deny the Eastridge Apartments water main Latecomer's Latecomer's Agreement. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, APPROVE COMMITTEE Denied REPORT. CARRIED. Latecomer.'s The Utilities Committee report recommended Council concur Agreements for with Public Works Department to approve the granting of Late- Completed comer's Agreements for Azalea Lane sanitary sewer lift station Installations and ,force main (8/20/79 referral ) and Superior Fast Freight water main (3/10/80 Council referral ) . The report recommended the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign agreements. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, APPROVE THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. S Talbot Hill The Utilities Committee report stated low bid for 1/28/81 Pump Station South Talbot Hill Pump Station W-600 was submitted by Teem Contract Award Ventures, Inc. in amount of $203,634 basic bid plus $54,318 for the recommended Byron Jackson pumps for subtotal of $257,952 plus sales tax $13,929.40; Total : $271 ,881 .40. The Committee report recommended Council concur with the Public Works Depart- ment and accept the low bid of Teem Ventures, Inc. , awarding the contract accordingly. The report also recommended the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Maplewood Addition The Utilities Committee report recommended that the Council . Water Co-op concur with the Public Works Department and approve the Maple wood Addition Water Cooperative request for emergency intertie. The report recommended the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the agreement; also that the Maplewood Addition Water Co-op meet with the Utility Staff to arrange for the design of this connection. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Garbage Collection Utilities Committee Minority Report from Chairman Shane regarding Rates letter from Louis Kwan 2/23/81 objecting to garbage rate for multi-family units, noted that the City will derive $360,000 garbage collection fees in 1981 . The report stated that if errors are made in individual customer charges, it is recommended that these cases be investigated and adjustments be made on the merits of each individual case. Mayor Shinpoch noted that the Staff has authority to correct any errors. No action was taken. AUDIENCE COMMENT Peggy Cummins, 1811 Grant Ave. S, Human Rights Commission, inquired regarding scheduling for the Committee of the Whole meeting. (See meeting schedule) Council President Pro tem Clymer noted further scheduling would need to be arranged with Council President. Stredicke or inquire of Council Secretary. Bruce McKay, Citizens Advisory Committee for Study of Council Salaries, inquired and was advised ordinance was adopted this date. Mayor Shinpoch expressed thanks for committee work. Executive Session MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, COUNCIL HOLD EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION OF LABOR NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Time: 8:58 p.m. Council reconvened in Regular Session. All ADJOURNMENT Council Members were present at Roll Call . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:17 p.m. Delores A. Mead, .C. City Clerk OF R . 0 THE CITY OF RENTON `$ MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n rn CHARLE-SJ. DRAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 09 co' CITY CLERK 094, SEPSE�,�P M �;�rc , 19 .;.� Ci`+/ Ca...:^ .1 .i sac .teo ry�, eJm 23 ) S . 333rd St . Federal 'Jay, 77.k 3.003 1"E�� C �e _ ' ,r�,, ♦- T c�^^e, ,,e�msy�H ,-6 0€ z 8 ++ ` . 1 3 0.1.E ae �1.+��`� 6�;e ,.1�dA4..ol� .+,b;;r4�kl.�vc� . i�d.�.s'B ':I4'O Mr' _v.".L . ._ :)ea:: Sir; The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, .area 2, 1 ; S1 has adopted O °di-i nancc Jos 3313 35V3, Ao c` 17, o `' is enclosed for your information. y , apy , y Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:jebdb Enclosure 2 n, ' 'bl i CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO 3517 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY :OF:: RENTON, WASHINGTON; • CHANGING ':THE--; 20„NING :CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN = s PROPERTIES WITHIN ".THE,;::C;ITY.'OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY ,:DISTR'ICT ;(R�;1::): AND RESIDENCE DISTRICT (.R-2) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT :,(R 2). AND ,RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R 3) (R 1°31 8'0' CF/CRG``ASSO`CIATE8) - WHEREAS` :und`er ;.Cha ter`r:7.';-.Tithe hV P. ;(Buildin Regulations)g of Ordinance -No; 1.6'2'8;*nowri'':a''s'-:th'e :Code of General Ordinances. of the City of Renton" as amended;;'and' the maps and reports adopted , in "conjunct-ion therewith, the:.--property .he:reinbelow described has .' heretofore .been, zoned d 'as._::`.Residence:. S:ingle Family District (R-1) and .. . ' ,,: Residence District (R-2;).;., .:and::'.• > WHEREAS. a''pr•oper,:petition: for.., change of zone classification of said property has been''filed'''with the .Planning Department on :or about December .;17., - 1.980 which '::petition was: duly referred; to the Hearing Examiner, for investigation, "s'tudy. and public hearing, ands-a public hearing having' been 'held'ther:eon`'.on or about January 20,- :' 1981, and said ;matter :having .been •'duly: considered by the Hearing ,:- Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s " .•: '. Comprehensive Plan : as amended City' Council having duly, .and '.the . considered :all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in' •support thereof or in opposition thereot ,"• NOW THEREFORE THE CITY.. COUNCIL OF THE CITY. OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO • : ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : • • SECTION I : ,The following described property in the City of Renton :is hereby' .rezoned..to Residence District (R-2) and ' Residence District. (R-3) as hereinbelow specified: subject to the findings , conclusions and decision of the Hearing Examiner dated January23 ,: 1981 ; the Planning''Director is hereby authorized and directed ' to change the maps` of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-Wit : . - t See.Exhibit "A?"-,attached :hereto and made a part hereof. ''as, if ,<s,.et:°;:forth. herein (Sai:d' pT`roper,ty. being beat d west` of Stevens Avenue - S -6.th Place) SECTION II : This;, Ord iance._;shall be effective upon its:, passage, approval 'and :fiv.e days,: after its publication. PASSED .BY THE CITY COUNCIL -this; 2nd day of March;,, ;1981.. ' f ='Delo'res A. Mead, City Clerk APPROVED.'.BY THE'- MAYOR :this 2nd .day of"March; 1481.4 44140 :40 Bar ara, Y. hippoc Mayor Approved as to form • Lawrence J:"�d ren; <city: Attorney.. ' Date. of Publication : ;..March 6, 19.81-: 4 • f Exhibit "A•" Ordinance:°No,.. 3517 _.r PARCEL "A-A"' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF R-2 TRANSITION ZONE PROPERTY. TO `. . 'BE` .'REZONED':TO R-3 That portion of the plat of.,Earlington, including streets and alleys, recorded • in Volume 14 of Plats," Page. 7 (AF #'43374.9)., Records of King County, Washington, and more particularly described,;as follows: :` Commencing at the intersectionof`the 'center,l ine _of Southwest 6th Place (First • Avenue) and the southerly''pro1ongation." of. the',westerly line of Lot 25, Block 15 of said Plat, thence. 4'7,1 °32'99 ' W along said centerline a distance of 150.00 feet to the true point ".`of beginning; thence N :.18°27'51" E a distance of 138.00 feet to a point of tangency with a curve to the right, the center of which bears S 71 °32' 09" E a .radi.al, distance of 150.00 feet; 'thence along said curve to the right through a central, angle of 90°00'.00" an arc length of 235.62 feet to a point of tangency; thence S 71°32'09"< E a distance of 80.00 ,feet to a point of tangency with a curve to the !light the center of which bears S 18°27'51" W a radial distance of 150.00 feet; '-thence along said curve to the right through a central angle of 83°42'41" "g , an arc length of, 219, 16' feet thence N 77 00 24 W ' a distance.of 53.6. '„feet. to` ,a point of tangency with a curve to the left, the center of which bears S ,12°59'36" W, a radial distance of 150.00 feet; thence along said curve to the left through a central angle of 41°41 '45" an arc distance of 109. 16 feet to a point, said point being on the easterly line of Lot 26, Block • 15, Plat of Earlington; thence N 18°27'51" :E along the easterly line of said Lot 26 and its northerly prolongational distance of 36.02 feet to a point on the centerline of the alley in said',Block. 15; thence along said centerline N 71 °32'09' W a distance of 80.00 feet to a point of intersection with the northerly prolonga- tion of the westerly Line of. Lot 25 of said' Block ,15; thence along said prolonga- tion and said westerly . line of` said Lot 25; S 18°27' 51" W a distance Of 138.00 feet to a point, sa:i.d point being the intersection. of the centerline of said Southwest 6th Place and the southerly prolongation of .the westerly line of Lot 25,,. Block 15, Plat of Earlington; thence S 71°32!09" E along said centerline of South- west 6th Place a distance of 40;.00 feet; .'to a point of the northerly prolongation of the easterly line of Lot 4 of Block'''17 .of' said ;plat; thence along said prolonga- tion and said easterly line of said Lot 4; 5 18°27'51" W a distance of 145.34 feet . to a point on the northerly right-of-way l in'e'of the Pacific Coast Railroad as • shown on the main line right-of-way and`;track map, Pacific Coast Railroad, Sheet 5 of 1 1 , Volume 2 Washington, records of:the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence along said northerly right-of-way line N. 71 °29'12" W a distance of 77.35 feet to a nontangent point . o-n a curve to the .right, the center of 'h, t1 , 5, ,;;��<,. '. ,., . :.s .. ce ,o ,1 �:QO .feefi:• rnen,ce.�'a'l.;ong Sa.i�d -�';:'��'�,,. -wh.i ch bears N 3�-, 53, ,�a, _E' a- rad i a l' d.i stan f 5. � ., � ,„.,I; ._ e "5 a5 r 5 'Zy z curve to the right anY:'ar'c 'distance of. :1.97..&7'`feet through '<a central, angle of , n 75°34'51"� to-..t'he.' t'ru_e. ;po'r,nt. of beg:i nn i ng. `'`` °'"'�: '.'SITUATE IN:. THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASH' GTDN', , CONTAINING .9;1 , 1:37..5,1: SQUARE. 1 EET,{'2:092 ;AC:RES`: • i,. r. ;t. LX iblt A•, :Ordihance'`No 3517 R-,I31-80 PARCEL "B-B", :-::`LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF .TAYLOR PROPERTY TO BE. REZONED,. FROM :l -1 :TO; R=:3. including streets and alleys, That portion 'of the Plat of Earl ington,'recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, Page 7 (A. F: #433749) , records of King County,. Wash i:ngton, and more particularly described as follows Beginning at the intersection of the -cen;ter,l:ine of: 'Southwest 6th Place (First ` ,Avenue) and the southerly..pr.olongati:on of', the�•westerly:.'line of Lot 25, Block 15, of said Plat of Earl ington;: thence:.N 18°271,5l". E along the westerly line of said" Lot 25 and its 'southerly and northerly prolongation a distance of 138.00 feet to a point on the centerline ,of the :'al:ley inPsa_id, Block. 15; thence along said center- line S 71 °32'09" E d i stance of:.80:00 ,feet Ito, a':po int of; intersection with the. • ,northerly prolongation ,of the easterly line Of 'Lot 26 in said Block 15; thence along said prolongation"and said "easterly .line of .Lot 26;.. 5 18°27'51" .E a dis- tance of 36. 02 feet to a non-tangent- po'int.'on. a-.curve to the left the center of which bears S ,28°42.'09" E a radial distance ,Of -150.00 .feet; thence along said curve to the left an arc' distance of 112. 14 .`feet through, a central angle of:. 42°50'09" to a point on the centerlineof .said, Southwest:6th. Place; thence N 7l °32'09" W along 'the::centerline of said Southwest 6th Place a distance of,40.00 feet to the true -point; of beginning. • SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASH CONTAINING 8,.238.,6,1 SQUARE FEET,¢ 0. 189. ACRES �: , Exhibit, IIAII +t ,N ;e;: ,-35 1 3 1 - :: 0 ':r Y'd>' . - it:-� 'i. 5 ''1 r J. - �,F+``.TAYLOR•<';PROP��RT°Y:~�R '1 .to.:"R-2�.. TRA T :„ ,e, rl?ARC�E,C• . i)'�D,_. ,L,EGA.L- DE�SCR,I P•T`IAN •:0 h..- .M, . rr'; t ,e' a�d� lle s ,�.incicadiri �-s, r ets: n '.a _ ,� g Y That. portion of:': :he-'P�lat :of',,Earlln :tong•••recorded,:i.n -Vol ume` 14 of .p;la'ts, Page, 7 • A'.E. 4 4 � records "o ';`:K-in-'g`...,Count, ,,_Wash`i:n'gton,.;'and''. mor'e 'particularly described ,:Y,; as foi lows: �,, 6: h .'Place First . _ �ceri��er':1:'�i'n'e-,'of:'.$outhwes,`t t �( _4:,_.,. � ;'Beg i nn i ng 'at �tFie�• i;ntees:.ect�ion"s�:,o`f'..th " _ -t ",• ; , f • Lot ,26' B1ock .1 h'e`s' 'u ., 'l.. at'i.on'''o,. �..tt e 'east:er'l' 1•i ne' o „ 5;' �;�° 'Ayenue) -an d •t - o. fhe��'l�y:'�:p,,o, g Y� ,; , , - a on. "•s.a`i d: prolongation"and said easterly :; of sa i d.•P1'at o.f• ,Ea,rtl:i.hgton;:; thente, 1 „g 1 i.ne .of sa i d•.Lot.26.•`:N:.,1'8.°2.7',51.'"'- E �a,'d.i stance`'of ,:1:01 .'98=feet to a point on a non-tangebrt''curve`',to:'':the _1eft'•'t.he .c'ento'r',o'.f=,.wh'i,ch' bears S'28°42'09" E, a radial • d i stance of"'150.00 'feet, t"hence:'alon,g:'•sa"i;d''- u crve- to the; left an arc distance of 112. 14 feet',through-:'-a tfce'nt`raal 'angl' .o:f :4,21°50,1 09,'''" to a point on the. centerline ,of-" • , said "Southwest 6tH;Pl'ac'e , thence S.•.7`l°32'0.9" E -alone the centerline of said South= P • west 6th P 1 ace a' di stance';,of ,40.00. feet to the I.true point of ,beginning S I TUATE'. IN THE, COUNTY' OF K I:NG,`;STATE• ' OF WASH-I NGTON. . " ,i ,' ` CONTAINING 2,801:'. 39•'SQUARE:',FEET 0..064,:ACRES' ;" - '• t,' - • -� ,1Ii _ , �v • .Ln � ;� ®� �. `•..'.' ^..:g, ��11lni � 7. :'.:...'1' ,4‘'....;1.47.-.7"0 • " i. ....4.41N. '` {>•�- 0' C;`� ,• — 4 O� — sa, U .. �'-k -Rir _ .��,''�,a•�'ti=:s ��llf.f�;7,' - _ , �=; .• � � • II `•..•`. �� !'! n1 4.y' _'.'• :,:' RSA iiwi% ilr�.'- •. "A//!�LT. !� �� \ '.'k;;�i ':...' rl., V �r - F t�p ram. G • e� _' � , a.. ca ate- a s. ai . S `.;`,;:�1C - ------ a , a�i'arts' y ,Q rr. -TT ��, ., h; : r : : '.,, 73.61azir..ate: r 1 {� � - sue' ..._ ■ 1.24. :. ;1411 49, "Fr ,..,,-;„..; w ir , - , . r !••;-• ',., ,. I ,i--..., .••j .. INeybri65.•::,,i,Willi • Nes .i.4 . : ._ • . • ',_____,i II" r'A ' laib.1 ▪ray'S' g'. z :q�. ®itit� d - e.....‘ Alt. '-40 r r___.7 fit.7,.„._ta .mil• 5ra • .z_. b 1.. r, c^ kit . :� • ——— b� - T. `+� B-I io--rt- ' � . . S' i. • „ _ .'es' a.nf' i',, • 9 ', i,,..% 4.�;r �.. ','.hr'. IN. 1� ,v' .;'iimi1 I,' . , .' F� + ",J s.,, B _ tI� ,' ,N aI`' �;Q,,,�� " r .-Y i Mail it • .,.., ,,,, , , , 41 .1.7./ ,,,i,4_1,ts, - .f..4111: II i; .0 ri, . ..r......,,..24,,L1 f : ,.. . ill!! .-0,1-• .•,,:.,,,, ••f . . i, -, :,,,,,,-,..,.,,,.....,, ,: :‘,. ,, .. , . j_. _ '_ : A -.. 1, iii R. . .,''. 71---.'--t-!_ :_1:_l'!..'r; '.1,•i , ,.-':-.;:'",. .t. z.q.1"..!••••"44--..,•;-"ZzirtfYili 4440,,-1.4• ' ' •, - ,L...,,,4, !...,,,-, ....._410.....,-: "'"*... --.;I Ille„ 840 -•...: ii- iii,j2"-4•• , • • = :R . ' '• ". add �I ' ;.,,U /t- ~"if.iO is. f ' •-' '' . ,fi•.:,, '::'' . � Ol�l% � I� . •, f f;i�� • ' � ,..,.•r :. 11 II r� c ► ti� �t I/1� ` ` � yi to.i ;••�.. `'r'-J',Ct,`.13:1'�,'".' 1r'_ 4147gtJJ ' ` it,s��I•! dl ira 4•JL� ,C4,' •` ' .'N`•,L, ,,\it..- •'.rc .� � ' „ t. �' , " tE � ��r •. rM,Via',.. a, i=.� yy7_ j . •\ y .' . k. i. . fEt4., '•di• a#:si•,i •� ":S :�• • --- \ \. z. n • ` '\•. +'Y, ST ,`-: x5;; ; ,%t _f !' : ah'. - , ill •,:• ; , ` - r �73 ` .SU3E► ,, Vr V F f . ' /11 r ux.,7' r- �\ \ • 'F .., \S b , r'. ,•r; ,. B - � _... r„-,_._ram.- ,..99.,_;. '4: ..i } ._ . c uv_ _7. 71/`:«ram • •�•.� .,—. •- _ ..._ - -- . • •REZONE', REQUEST R-;1` to'•R-2'", . • ' 0 . 064 Acres • • CF/CHG ASSOCIATES? :',-:.... ,. :.R-1 .to '.Et'-3 • 0 . 189 Acres FILE NUMBER Tt-2. to R-3 . 2. 092 Acres ., - , . . . R-131-80 . • • • APPLICANT Ck'/CI�G ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 2,, 34 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS STEVENS AVENUE S.W;, • EXISTING . ZONINGR-1, 'Residence-Single Family;R-2, Residence-Two Family • EXISTING USE VACANT ' ; ' _ . • PROPOSED USE •• -MULTIPLE 'FAMILY-,RES.IDENTIAL COMPLEX , COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE. 'PL.AN. .HIGH'DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY- COMMENTS .. .. , _ • • yI s r. . C- I ,. . .. - � - ,A�`:"r `, y.:�. fin - } :�' .'i ,.kt" i•r' 4.;Yty..i r�a,[„�'.. .{ 1 .L .-$. ,r•1',",G.:"_•, :+...,.tJ1L°?,F'.,t��'"��r.4`itu�ir?e •s, s'�:: : - •.,,. .'i . f/�� ,t _. Renton City Council 2/23/81 Page 2 CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion, which follows those business matter included, unless otherwise requested: Final Payment MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED,TO REMOVE ITEM 6F RE FINAL Airport Watermain PAYMENT OF RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT WATERMAIN PROJECT AND Project TO HOLD FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Request for Holmes Electrical Contractors request for latecomer's agreement Latecomer's for required extension of watermain for fire hydrant on Seneca SW Agreement-Holmes and water and sewer. lines on Raymond SW. Refer to Utilities Electric Committee. Transfer of Funds Finance/Personnel Departments request resolution for transfer Unemployment of funds in the amount of $8,000.00 to cover fourth quarter Compensation payments in 1981 for Unemployment Compensation. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. a Transfer of Funds Parks Department request resolution for transfer of funds John Bean Sprayer in the amount of $3,469.77 for purchase of John Bean Sprayer. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. CF/CHG Associates Hearing Examiner recommended approval of rezone from R-1 and Rezone R-131-80 R-2 to R-2 and R-3.as requested by CF/CHG Associates. Residential planned unit development located west of Stevens SW at the intersection of SW 6th Place. R-131-80. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Acceptance of Public Works Dept. request for acceptance of project, Municipal Airport East Airport East Perimeter Road Watermain, as of March 2, 1981 . Perimeter Road Approval of final payment and also subsequent release of retained Watermain Project amount subject to receipt of required releases. Council concurred. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA Approved AS AMENDED, CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Public Meeting Letter was read from David R. Clemens, Acting Planning Director, Northeast Quadrant that the Renton Planning Commission andthe Northeast Quadrant Comprehensive Comprehensive Planning Committee will hold a public meeting Plan on the Northeast Quadrant of the Comprehensive Plan on March 11th at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers. Assignment of Council positions for the upcoming 1981 elections were designated Council Positions by Delores A. Mead, City Clerk. #1 - Councilman Shane's position, #1-2-3 #2 - Councilman Clymer's position, and #3 - Councilman Reed's position. OLD BUSINESS Cat Problem Councilman Stredicke presented letter to be read from Jessie G. Leendertsen re uncontrolled freedom and increasing population of cats. Zoning Code- Councilman Stredicke inquired regarding position of the City Airport Use re the P-1 zoning use limitation on the airport; noting resulting conflicts with regard to development provisions of existing leases . (Fancher Flyways). Ensuing discussion revealed the matter is presently in the Planning & Development Committee awaiting Aviation Committee recommendation and is also being pursued administratively. Interest Councilman Rockhill noted the $2,136,455.23 received in investment Earned interest last year commending Acting Finance Director, Ted Bennett. Houser Way N. Councilman Rockhill inquired re the status of converting Houser Way N. to one way traffic. Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director, noted they were. waiting for dry weather to paint the street markings. RENTON CITY, COUNCIL Regular Meeting February 23 , 1981 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; JOHN W. REED, CHARLES COUNCIL SHANE, THOMAS W. TRIMM, EARLY CLYMER, ROBERT J. HUGHES, RANDALL ROCKHILL. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney, IN ATTENDANCE DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk; W.E. BENNETT, Acting Finance Director; DAVID CLEMENS, Acting Planning Director; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Acting Public Works Director; RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief;IDON PERSSON, Police Dept. Rep., MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 9, 1981 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. Journeyman Mayor Shinpoch introduced George Monaghan and Robert Deines Firemen who have just completed a three year program to become journeyman firemen. Congratulations were extended. Gwen Marshall Mayor Shinpoch noted the recent passing of Gwen Marshall , Finance Director, and funeral Wednesday, 2:00 P.M. at Faull 's Mortuary. Ted Bennett has been appointed Acting Finance Director. - PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and mailed according to law, Mayor Shinpoch opened the LID 321 public hearing to consider L. I .D. 321 to construct and install Sanitary Sewer sanitary lateral ,side sewers to property lines and appurtenances NE Sunset Blvd. in the vicinity of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE. Letter was and Duvall NE read from Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director, that no protests had been received against the LID. Mr. Houghton explained Preliminary the project and noted contact had been made with K.C. Boundary Assessment Roll Review Board, State Attorney General 's Office and AWC as previously $58,127.79 ordered by council . The proposed LID does not lie within any other sewer district. Shannon O'Neil , 2259 70th SE, Mercer Island, noted daughter has property outside the city 'and would like to annex to get the sewer service. Councilman Trimm noted those properties in the county will not be allowed to connect to the sewer until the area is annexed; the city, will assume trunk costs until that time and a latecomer's charge will be assessed. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OF LID 321 AND REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke noted for the record that this is the first sewer LID that has come before the council in over two years that has not had any protests from the property owners, based on the fact that the Public Works Dept. extended the effort to meet with the people. The administration was commended. AUDIENCE COMMENT Louis' Kwan, 611 Smithers Ave. S. , noted he had been paying for Garbage Rates garbage pick-up of four cans, when in fact he only had two. Mr. Kwan's main concern was the difference in charges for single family and a higher rate for multi-family units - even though their garbage is no different. MOVED BY REED, SECOND STREDICKE, TO REFER THE MATTER OF GARBAGE RATES TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Request for Shannon O'Neil , 2259 70th SE, Mercer Island, requested a latecomer's Latecomer's agreement for his property on Sunset Blvd; Delores A. Mead, Agreement explained the procedure to submit his request to be placed on the agenda .prior to council. meeting. Lindbergh Mayor Shinpoch called attention to Lindbergh High School student High present from Mr. Little's class. For Use By City Cleris Office Only A. I . # ' AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING ,4`6"=,'�� k �` s 5 "Freyy i ___ry6 p.�fi> Jw�,' SUBMITTING > � � -� Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of 2-23-7iNd t. .\\I�� 1 (Mee t i n6;;12a tg,,40% 1U,`. ! ' Staff Contact Marilyn J. Petersen \cf� C®-(�o{SO�c`G�. , (Name) Agenda Status: �^ C��R� , ��' SUBJECT: File No. R-131-80; ��'g%C �7 Consent X CF/CHG Associates Public Hearing Correspondence - Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 1-23-81 Other B. C. ' Approval : ' ' Legal Dept. Yes_ No_ N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes No N/A X • ' Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: • Expenditure .Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- i Budgeted Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The Examiner's report for the subject application was published on January 23, 1981 and an appeal period established to expire on February 6, 1981 . Since this matter has not been appealed, the report is being forwarded to City Council members for review prior to placement on the City Council agenda of February 1-6s1981 - for referral to Ways and Means Committee and subsequent adoption of an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 3 of the attached report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. For _e By City Clerk's Offite Only A. I . f AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm, Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of 2-23-71 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn J. Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-131-80; Consent X CF/CHG Associates Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Ete. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 1-23-81 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X — --- COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The Examiner's report for the subject application was published on January 23, 1981 and an appeal period established to expire on February 6, 1981 . Since this matter has not been appealed, the report is being forwarded to City Council members for review prior to placement on the City Council agenda of February 16, 1981 ; for referral to Ways and Means Committee and subsequent adoption of an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 3 of the attached report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF R4, 1,1. '°',, z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 NAL o BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER co FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 09g1EO SEPSe ' February 9, 1981 Mr. Randall Potter C.H.G. Associates 200 S. 333rd Street ; Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: File No. R-131-80; CF/CHG Associates. Dear Mr. Potter: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved as noted on the Examiner's report of January 23, 1981 , has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval . You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council . Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 23rd day of January , 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. gAft.e.t..,,„4., Subscribed and sworn this L ,o day of (-- a Vlu&,c-/ 19 S I \-\,wzC '--k_ k ILA) Notary Public in and for tJe State of Washington, residing at Prv��G)l Application, Petition or Case: CF/CHG Associates; R-131-80 (The minute's contain a ti6t 06 the pcur ,i_es 06 necond. ) January 23, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: CF/CHG Associates FILE NO. R-131-80 LOCATION: Located west of Stevens Avenue S.W. at the intersection of S.W. 6th Place. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a rezone from R-1 and R-2 to R-2 and R-3. The site will be utilized as part of the residential planned unit development. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on January 14, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 20, 1981 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal . Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Map of Rezone The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Randall Potter C.H.G. Associates 200 S. 333rd Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Mr. Potter concurred with the report and stated that approval of the proposal would provide additional open space within the project and allow wider spacing of buildings to improve aesthetics on the site. The Examiner inquired regarding disposition of a previous rezone on the property for which an appeal is pending before the City Council . Mr. Potter advised that a meeting with the Planning & Development Committee of the City Council is scheduled for Thursday, January 22, 1981 , and disposition would be made at the following City Council meeting. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department staff. Mr. Blaylock suggested that the hearing be continued or additional time allowed in which to publish a decision pending the outcome of the ,City Council 's action on the previous rezone. Following consideration, the Examiner determined that a continuance would not be necessary. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. R-131-80 was closed by ;the Examiner at 9:41 a.m. R-01-80 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of approximately .064 acres from R-1 (Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 7200 square feet) to R-2 (Duplex Residential) ; . 189 acres from R-1 to R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) ; and 2.092 acres from R-2 to R-3. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, an Environmental Impact Statement prepared for areas immediately adjacent was determined to be sufficient for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. Utilities will have to be extended to the subject site. 7. The subject site is located west of Stevens Avenue S.W. at the intersection of S.W. 6th Place. The site was annexed into the city in July of 1948 by Ordinance No. 1320. In July, 1978, a portion of the site was reclassified R-2. 8. The R-1 portion of the subject site was one of three parcels which remained classified R-1 when adjacent property was rezoned to R-2 and R-3 to accommodate a ,Planned Unit Development proposed for approximately 46 acres. This R-1 portion of the subject site was buffered from higher density R-3 property by land classified for less intense R-2 uses. The petitioner has requested that the subject site be classified to R-2 and R-3 (See map for proposed areas of reclassification) . The single family home which occupied the site was moved to another location. 9. The Comprehensive Plan designates that the area in which the subject property is located is suitable for the development of high density multiple family uses. 10. The areas surrounding the subject site are currently zoned R-3 to the east and west of the subject site, and R-2 south and north of the subject site. There is a B-1 district to the east of the subject site. Most of the R-2 zoning in the vicinity of the subject site was classified as such to buffer the single family uses and zoning (R-1) located just north of the Milwaukee Railroad tracks and those single family uses in the vicinity of S.W. Sunset Boulevard. 11 . Most of the area surrounding the subject site is proposed to be developed as the Earlington Woods Planned Unit Development (PUD) . East of the proposed residential complex is a proposed business/commercial PUD. The Sears/Renton Shopping Center, is located along Rainier Avenue S. east of the subject property. The former Milwaukee Road Railroad right-of-way is located just south of the subject site, and to the north is S.W. Sunset Boulevard. 12 . The areas surrounding the proposed rezone site have been extensively graded and cleared in preparation of the proposed PUD. The subject site would be incorporated into the PUD if the rezone is approved by the City Council . 13. The areas which comprise the PUD were conditionally rezoned. The contingents were based on timely filing of the PUD and progress towards the overall construction on the site. A subsequent petition for rezone is currently pending before the City Council which would remove certain of the restrictions from the property including the possibility that the zoning would revert to earlier single family classification. 14. The proposal maintains a lower R-2 classification around the remaining southerly single family uses to serve as a buffer between these uses and the R-3 uses proposed in the PUD. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010 which provides in part that: R-131-8a _ Page Three a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstahces in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria have been met to permit the reclassification of the subject property. 2. The proposed classification is compatible with both the Comprehensive Plan, which designates the area in which the subject property is located as suitable for high density multifamily use, and the surrounding zoning, which is also a combination of R-3 and R-2, the classification proposed by the petitioner. 3. The proposed PUD which has received initial approval and for which extensive grading and filling has occurred is a considerable change in circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located. Also, the removal of the single family residence which was located on part of the subject site and was buffered by the remainder of the subject site demonstrates a significant change in the area justifying the proposed reclassification of the subject property. 4. The proposed -R-2 and R-3 zoning requested by the applicant will maintain a reasonable buffer between the remaining R-1 properties which are still occupied by single, family uses while at the same time expanding the area on which the applicant can establish the proposed PUD. The rezoning of the subject property will permit the expansion of the open space and allow better building separation along the southern end of the PUD. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject site from R-1 and R-2 to R-2 and R-3 as indicated by. the attached map. ORDERED THIS 23rd day of January, 1981 . Fred J. K u man Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of January, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Randall Potter, CHG Associates, 200 S. 333rd, Federal Way, WA 98003 • TRANSMITTED THIS 23rd day of January, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before February 6, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment , or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant , and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department , first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. . . , low, . .... .. , ‘ . 4.1...; :ste,-.-j ,---_., , : ,- ?, ,A ..reciv.w.ar.,- liT :, L , ,. --,..-•. ..; s6",t'' ' - , • .E' el 'b-It' •% •,-44-vs' .'1..,..\•—•'' "I •• . ' -":•-14 -,.. ' i'"\, i : , •;. • ri z,.. , -c-, • .. - ... ...1 , ,., , ..1 . ...... .i..! . .. ... f# CO ..:• • i ' 1 P"7" 1 . ' • 4 ,.; • . tr , . . . • .. ..- . , ... , 1.t!.. i..Fi.N j; I.'.--- 71 • i Sb r li • 4 It . . . .,..,_....L) , 'Iss, s's,II .$ • • *-7--- 4 i i—a..S..._ . 0 • . - -- —- --- ........ -- - • .. ; :------ ., 1--rio . ,__ p. . 4,1 Ci•hf:1 A .9 2 i.1',' . ' • . ___ , . 1.14. > • .1 •-•-st,1.':is'ei t..II.;:. !i,..... ....1 • ] . .4 d . .i.in".1-1 c '! • . ., .,. !.. L___ • • • .. atr...14, . •ictr,•1". . es si„ri, y..• . • . . • s,• • •i. •.1-,i, • I. a.17' iti.71. ' •.--1;.. ...'11 4.4 1!1 4, .t Fr't C., . r , . • 1 ;. 1 • • 4„ . . t..). • • :1. . : i..i.AA...! . . . . . 1._ %. •-• " 1;•.::•It Fig : • : tt ,1-.11 ' . • ':' ;(\i i i . 1 r...ii, I - T-, T, 1 ,_...- 1. . i —az. 4,...i k...r.., - 55 2 .,.. . . ' . A ' . 13 .. ..1.1 , 1 ,•t• .i. • . . • •1• s, IN\ S . : 14. I" '..Ie... .." 7 la . . •' ''''..........4...... ...I •-. ..1..1 • .... ., _ . .. .. • . • • •14-1+ . , r- , 7 - ...}-4.- . ,,,,,,i -ti, ,, ,i. : r., .. ....; ,N.w.., rd. fAc. : a . . . . . • , . ., ... i ,. . 1 I F..4.T.V es a. L. - A --- • .. ' :, . . . . ..... , ! ..*1 '• A.1 1. •I•ts i 1• 1•1.f.19.is j p r‘ `i • . `1, . r ...t. 4 , frsi0-'r„, •: Ne.,.. I, I i I i LH I I _ . ...... 1--/ t.......1 ...,' , • !"------1 7•17:1 1 .. .• • ' ' . Noel.4.11111.0.1.•t•gnre;16;1 37,. f..... e...,,_ 1 Di i.„1 ; • ''v-! .7..• • ....1„TT;T:1:7-47• a . I r,,. :7-7 7 •,,-*Sl-... 4";..• . .. . - r . 1 _. ... oq 1 irr,r:„ i..q • , . ...,„;. , . zi ! , , 0' : , ., .\i' ,,T ;.,,.., .:,,, 1 -- _A.•.>, . .._ • :• ... .c:J . • . .... 1 _ . ,,,,..,.07,,, ,, i , 4..:_.,, 44sr'--- ' 471 - If '- pl • • -- . ,; --I' • ri------ 1 . . 111 .4, o - 1111 - kg 7' - • .i. • . 1 p,....- .f.....,,a,...• 1 ..,,ts 0 •le it .1.1, t. . • ..N......... ‘...I. I 7.. • ...\ ., . ..,.`. . 464; • t i I 11*•.-'11. 7-1 !--•.,_.. I.' 'SC... t . .-- - ! . Bal • ..,__ • ,, • --,- ...._..... --_,,, 3 x, - i-- .. , . •....._...k. „,--- , TI _• . • • 1s s--%. - v. •• kt i I, ' . . • , • ;• ••• -- • • • `,--/' . • 1,,,,„.;., ---st----.1_,,„ flit ' •I III R-.' - -- - ;., -• :..• ,.: .• ..., , •-.,/ sie. N., , -.T.7-4... .... . . 5 • -;74i1::::-/‘ Ss, ' ..a..,4__..4. Ow. 1 dh CM:I:v.4 •....'""s•,. _.1.. • . '.! p„. so 1 • • . .. . . . . . . . / ..;".......„-z,..4...._,,,k !tit ittiii.... 911,!•4•44.. ' :II 3._:. . .. . ' •-• i . a . a,:arit -.44 4.,_ ii ...• -14., : ,1 / / b 11*/.! 'I•r, 44-4.4:•`617 I • 1 I i • 'li la • i . lc • c• . 1 ---iirrli w.,,v,- „shoo_ TI L ' R-1 .-. - Artp iti iiii"fon . ;8.; bi .. ii'• zi-1,..ti..k„'4,-).1.1".b. . i:: --..---J . , ..., 0,4....;. . .....,,,,,,;..,:. - . . . 4;:iy.,,,,, pu,,,,il withi,.-- ..• . tin* '' '0 ' . 7i\tk,r' • •:. •0- 4'1 • I. 411/ifilla"4'' i" Nig..; lit- wigilf ' AAir .. ..... •, cl,, !..i.•.,.. ..-. .._ 1 _ 14m' ,- ,g7 6 •;laiit -4.1. — • • • '' , ‘, Ito‘\ pt ) . ., •- ‘ ‘: A •.. , -.:•,.„,440. • 0'i ' P ."pittit. l':•i . • • ., • • , '''''‘‘..‘, t• • 1 N"......„,,, -4;'11 , "• --:.,--.. .c.,.... - • \; .\ ..... * . • ..,i.."IA .01:-Agil...).# -- — - . • - .,,,.• 2--- iiiiiii,„,,t4.4....,•-.. ,,,,,c,,,, . . R49. , ... ., ., ,-zto—to • 73 . . . . . 1 • . ...:,,. r-43{fakz- ' *.-.41.14:,..-stj• -.1'Allark.• ,C4t. C't \ .•,---.t. ‘ #..‘..„ Ali::i• j • -• ..• 41-4 Z!.? ' AP,. raltk• ;• , . I. % `, , .. t?",,orti,tr.. . , '• . , 4 i,..., .,. ...A,". .oi itqk.,. ,'. . • • . . • 0 - •'.• \ ‘ ..2;--7-,"` • .-• " ..,,:• • -, -... 4 '4). 4t4f;7/ A • • ';:.. :/. . • • , ‘ • !LC`r!-:-.11,.. I!?-1.,r• ://'• • ' i# karr _ ,. L_ ....1 VOINNEW - , ' • • , ' . .. ••• .P,, • . ,. .... .... ...„. : . --- % \ \ , L 011' .• \ .. •! -.. % 1, —,... .......... , . % \ .1,, • • • • \73\ SUB3E ' • ........ .-- - . . 1 , s . „, • i .t...... . • 1 i . -"--•..........-' .. • ' . • N :A' \X/7 • , ' • Sli 1. i 4.....:‘ . . 1 : • --, .. .........-..............4...:..........:..--;.....-...... ............—............______...r...::.. 4. . .._.__..., c IA.,— 7T/ti••••••••• . .. . . • • . , , REZONE REQUEST , R-1 to R-2 0.064 Acres .. . . . . . CF/CHG ASSOCIATES R-1 to R-3 0. 189 Acres • • . FILE NUMBER R-2 to R-3 2.092 Acres . . -.., , , • R-131-80 . . •. • . . • . . • • . . . _ _ _ . _ . . . . • • • . . • . . . ......., ' . . . . . . • APPLICANT CF/CHG. ASSOCTI1TES TOTAL AREA 2. 34 Acres .• • PRINCIPAL .ACCESS STEVENS AVENUE S. W. . . . • • EXISTING ZONING ' .' Residence-Single Family;Ii-2, Residence-Two Family - . EXISTING USE VACANT . . • . , . . . • . • . PROPOSED USE MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX . . . . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY . . COMMENTS • . . . • . . . • . ' -'...: . • • . . • . , . • . • " . . • , • • • .• . . . • . . . ••• •. . , . . . • • . , • ,. a • , . . .. , . . . . . . S CF/CHG ASSOCIATES REZON S '•f. FILE NUMBER R-131-80 i,4 vv ......... ., A.. I 9F /SO N \ i\ ti WQ, • .°b.' qX k" Lti• il '';*............ ••••••• ' ... %.5‘ 0°' 6 -/ e� , , . /o r oy G6 c, -` R-2 to R-3 ' ZOtD ZVI:.0 �C. • (2.092 Acres) 5 S7ro � � � o `� N A S ;: 0 7.'. AfillioW 4: ' ° - ; E X H + e -1 to R-3 %11 1/4 / /0 " � �� 0. 189 Acre„) �� 4 � o. S �3c- 0 Nii. / ' 6. e ',#1,,01 v,,,„,,„„,. "1. . ,- • .,_ 0 __ - _ $ r e oor. � • f r t r'ts•I+ - ' • 01 1.45 /` / . sT. hl770` , ;c: .. � \ .. v44 • 2 • • f %, o l W / '3 • ti P./y t ?le "meow over vs o� J,/�OTy r • . s 2 � o.. ....1110• �� r O 70 vs. ' c. c fit? �Ii 'cr0 ' 0• 1 a -0 s , „‘0I'.‹);''e Z/ 17J !; ' ® I . . f/ /0 .p1)o•t\) .e0 r i)1. 1• IP0':-5',‘Ni<.)it.:,t. r 7 co• R-1 o R-2 '- - i� 0� . ,O (h. 4. , \ ,[� � K' (0.064 Acres) `,,\ / •S t9 •�� y • L'e ,0 . / - o�tJ ®,� 0/ ,yam .S. . • / , , / V1 L:� 7 ! d s O 0� • MEMORANDA OF CONCURRENCE APPLICATION NO(s) : R-131 -80 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request to rezone properties from R-1 and R-2 to R-3 for uses as multi- family residential P.U. D. PROPONENT: CF/CHG Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Vicinity of 513 Stevens Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: January 7 , 1981 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under The Final Environmental Imapct Statement are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental review is still valid per the mitigating measures addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement. This decision was reached following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-639-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Impact Statement : Earlington Woods P.U.D. dated: March 1979 2) Application (s) : R-131-80 SIGNATURES: �' �t � �- Tci� r G. Ne son, Building i . emens, Acting Director Planning Director (2`"-,44t1r Richard C. Houghton; cting Public Works Director PLYING aDEPARTMENT PR 1IM][]L''`r y REPORJL TO 41 a is HEARING i.: ' i 'LLWICLILI PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 20, 1981 APPLICANT: CF/CHG ASSOCIATES FILE NUMBER: R-131 -80 A. S In i'ni,A rlf & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a rezone from R-1 and R-2 to R-2 and R-3 . The site will be utilized as part of the residential planned unit development. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: I: 1 . Owner of Record: CF/CHG ASSOCIATES 2 . Applicant: CF/CHG ASSOCIATES 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Located west of Stevens Avenue S.W. at the intersection of S.W. 6th Place. 4 . Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: R-1 to R-2 0. 064adres R-1 to R-3 0. 189 acres R-2 to R-3 2. 092 acres 6 . Access : Stevens Avenue S.W and S.W. 6th Place. 7 . Existing Zoning: R-1 , Residence- Single Family and R-2 , Residence Two-Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-1 , R-2 , R-3, Residence Multiple Family 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan: High Density Multiple Family Residential. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on January 9 , 1981 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on January 9 , 1981 . C. ci ISTORY/is RGRI D: The site was annexed into the City on July 8 , 1948 , through Ordinance 1320. On July 24 , 1978, a portion - of the site was rezoned to R-2 by Ordinance 3233 . A draft environmental impact statement was prepared and distributed on January 29 , 1979. The final environmental impact statement addressing all comments on the draft was issued on March 29 , 1979. PLANNING OEPARTMEN'1? PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CF/CHG ASSOCIATES JANUARY 20, 1981 PAGE TWO D. Pt:: 'SICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The site is fairly level. 2. Soils : The subject site is composed of two primary soil types : Beausite Gravelly Sandy Loam (BeC) , and Beausite Gravelly Snady :oam (Bed) . Beausite (BeC) , permeability is moderately rapid; available water capacity is low. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of erosion is moderate. The soil is used for timber and pasture and for urban;.development. Beausite (Bed) , runoff is rapid and the hazard of erosion of severe. This soil is used for timber and pasture. 3. Vegetation: The site has been graded in preparation for site development for the P.U.D. A . Wildlife: Wildlife has been displaced. 5 . Water: Surface water is evidenced on the site. 6 . Land Use: The surrounding area is undeveloped as a result of the grading. Directly east of the larger site is Renton Shopping Center, while to the north a small mixture of commercial and single family uses exist. The site itself is undeveloped . land. The existing railroad track line and Earlington Industrial Park are located directly south of the P.U.D. site. E. IE I ti:uI,e 'm O D The neighborhood is undeveloped. A preliminary residential , P.U.D. has been approved. F. PUBLIC SE n•ICES: • All public services will be provided as a requirement of the Planned Unit Development. • G. APPLICABLE .SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-708 , R-2 , Residence - Two-family 2 . Section 4-709A, R-3 , Residence - Multiple Family H. P PLICABLE SECT'IO''S OF 19t C i;I uumSIVE PLAN OR CIH' OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land USe Report, 1965 , PAges 17-18, Objectives, Page 11 , Residential 2 . Land Use Hearing Examiner, Section 4-3014 (c) , I. IMPACT OF T NATURAL ©;: ;:.II�„�.\N ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Rezoning the subject site will not directly affect the property. 2 . Population/Employment: Rezoning to the site could theoretically increase the ultimate P.U.D. develop- ment by 41 units or 106 persons. i PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CF/CHG ASSOCIATES; R-131 -80 JANUARY 20, 1981 PAGE THREE 3 . Schools : School population will increase to a theoretical maximum of. 33 students based on 41 new units. 4 . Social: Minor 5. Traffic : Traffic impacts were extensively discussed in the EIS. THE EIS ADDRESSED A MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT OF 510 UNITS THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 489 UNITS. J. E WI R r7i'I"I':Nn! I AL ASSESSMENTITHRESIOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Memorandum of Concurrence on January 7 , 1981 . K. '\GENCIES/IIDEPARTMENTS C®]F➢TA C D: 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. L. PIING DDP A.,',' T ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the existing zoning and Plan designation of High Density Multiple Family•• for the subject site and the surrounding area. Thus complying with Section 4-3014 (c) (1 ) (b) . 2. The rezone is a result of CHG International, Inc. purchasing the Taylor property and the application of the setback conditions applied under Ordinance • No. 3233 on July 28 ,;1978 to the adjoining property to R-3 , Residence - `MUlltiple Family. The Taylor Property approximately-1/4 of an acre has not been considered in a rezone request since its annexation in 1948. Therefore, this would appear to comply with the first criteria outlined in Section 4-3014 (C) (1 ) (a) . • 3 . Section 4-3014 (C) (1 ) (c) states that a rezone request can be granted if there have been significant public or private project developments constructed that affect the subject property. The approval of pre- liminary plans for the residential planned unit development along with the actual absorbtion of the Taylor Property into the proposed project would suggest that there have been significant and material changes. 4 . The rezone request has been submitted based upon the setback conditions imposed in 1978 to buffer the remaining single family residences . The applicant has specifically attempted to comply with the intent of previous recommendations of the Hearing Examiner and the final rezoning action of the City Council. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CF/CHG ASSOCIATES; R-131 -80 JANUARY 20, 1981 PAGE FOUR 5. Rezoning the property will increase the potential development by 41 units . The preliminary plans proposed by the developer anticipate increasing the Planned Unit Development from 458 units to 489 units. The Final EIS evaluated impacts of 510 units; therefore, the increase has been specifically considered and the Environmental Review Committee has concurred that the proposal is within the original scope of the project. 6. The only possible alternative to the request would be to deny the request. However, this would serve no particu- lar purpose since the applicant will comply with original setback conditions imposed in 1978. On the other hand, approval of the request will allow the applicant the opportunity to revise the approved PUD plans and hopefully provide more appropriate building separations and open space for recreation. M. RECO ATION: Based upon the above analysis , it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approved the requested zone change from R-1 , Residence-Single Family and R-2 , Residence-Two Family to R-2, Residence-Two Family and R-3 , Residence- Multiple Family. . .. ' - .. . -,. • _ , • ...1 1 • !..<:)-. ' - LS lits"."' r— • 3 PEI 11`. Vile '3 ".' ''''• ' 4'lit"-1'''' ' ' a k •. 1.1.4)9 A*7 tO r ,..‘ , ....„..... .,.. , , , a,, p.," .1!'_ . •<.. pi ItijSKIIIN C* • IP I i7jrgs1::414 ti -' a at • 1 .. ' . ! • eSt‘ 0 • — 15*I s M cueing 4,-'.. "Ili.• d' i>•::*"•1•, . ', s, - •' 4 Alb .VAC . 1 111% "Ad •r;ild M, iii .?` ->-•" . !IL.. :.....-At'..61,.:14.e.r."1:iruir::.-14 di • ' ICE U.:Willi. , ' .'3I" • N 1 • „ .. ^ii'' 1 -.''' Ilt _;3_I lag lig•' ';59 A 9 r-TI :gig iiiiiii, .i, , ........t..._ a . 47'4' • • • . I L bit..0.‘, ... ': ,, ' '• i —— ...‘ s 4112111t. • • __ — --Kaer,'-'7, ' ' .. ....4 0 ',` fr . ' 7 el.41111 1 I '---' ; " 6•P'll ' ••• ; .,1. •,1;.„‘, 6 5 • 3 k ! fb .16-.CT-II 44 I:74j 1%4.m A re • 8 ." . Iiiih. MI I II l '- . 1 . . , - , -1._ 3 ,..44 - *, .^-74 " •., 53 2--.1 ing , f ..,. ,...; , 4 ,,,,,„ r , iii, , , •- til N.* NT k C6\ \ AO n P,P Tip t ,pl ri•0 1* * * '1 4 L-_ 1_1 ...,,, ,. • • + . ,,.,‘ I -i 11 , .'15. . .14. 4 * 1.-117 , le 1 ,n '' •• . - 1, 1 . ,.y.„q , . - , 4 17-1 r----1 rP171 IN , • . , 6 1 • 1 Ilk I \\.1':;:\ 43.kai„...: . ,.,.., s "' , 1:1 . .---.- iii at MI6 I \ \ *. 1 TliTs-PesPervis IT , • T.'01.7p—rs. 1--1. ,;.,+:41 "tt.I '"' -r''. ,•,4, \ ;;•1\ •,,,., ALL ...1, •.,,,...,.- . .. „ z, , Niel i . 1, —1._ !•r_ . . • , . ry 0..- • . --.1;tE; Is ,• I I a 14 - -,-4Tr •-a.,.. , ,_ ' % ', il' t40 i 1 ti- •-f-A-_ p,„,,.z4 .j. . I ,, ... , , -•-•.,: „ - 7 la i - -,..:, . ./...L., _. ,. , . , 4 .4 R.,„. ft 7- - Air,.!h "111:8 .r , IM.:jw t i a 11/141111 ,,. . ,..--- , ^II.. I t "IA.% AV All ,^Tr.^•. __,.11 --L- ..,1..__.1.• •1.1.I.1 . 4..... .4,„ ,,,, 1 _ " qm,:c....%.,,,.. ‘,....., --- -...._ c.....- 11 ,-!! 4,1t41°. , I • ii an_ I., --....„. I lip 191- . .2..4.4- it ,11 --„ ,.. RIP-E ' • • 4 - ., rat iii ?II*? ....,_111 .-. 14-.41"h‘it • /.1, ',.. , 4- Ihs -1 R ,,,- 1 R-I . ,,, ,44. „Int .47 stillo llirtam,a0,411,04 111.0111111 1P,il • N\n„ L 4 i•1 * • 4 IMP --‘•".* . li PO'. \ 2:1 ‘ L 8164WHISAR "' • `Illimall•mtelotirats ::. t; • -- //ma, 1 - ii-0 -ilt„ka4,414'.4 . ., , z., "la .3A I '.. '---"--•• . ' ''' ' • ••• ---.. it , '—',".ti,4 qz/jal , -0•'' ,„,,.-, `:,' : • • • CN, • • • --• \ \ - , • ,•itit., , - % \ \ \ \\\ VA13e T S .LY° .,„4: '' .: 44, ',' '. ' 4,.-\,-, \\t4114^,..." at, 5...744 .. • ^ • „ TIT S'33 1 v:04 ct.‘1‘ \ ..— \e f •-• ----":1, t -,1 ,. , . „ . •1: .z _-, •'‘_.v•r,,,,,--, ,z%:•'.:. ," ' -': i 2‘ . , ,••- •-- ... ; 6 4. fil.',Pt..46.,,'• ., : ,, , , ,, \ \ \ \ , 1 • ) • ..... '•• iSA . . 'I r• '''.. .,1.•'•"-'4 • , LI'* ..,„,,, ,.. • •,,'"--.. r . NrA, , ...• ri: ,,..,...., - ...., . .... ,,,,_ ,- ,-................." .., ._ , \ , \ , . , . _11 (IF ,, ,.„0 • ••••-•-... •-t \ I.:.I ,/ \10\•,. i , - SUE3E - • .,...„. ___:......,.....--,.. !....____-____.________=_. . — C WU— WU•••••^"." ......`"..-- i REZONE REQUEST R-1 to R-2 0 .064 Acres CF/CHG ASSOCIATES R-1 to R-3 0. 189 Acres FILE NUMBER R-2 to R-3 2.092 Acres R-131-80 T APPLICANT CF/CHG ASSOCIATES TOTAL AREA 2. 34 Acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS STEVENS AVENUE 8,W, - EXISTING ZON I NG R-1 , Residence-Single Family;R-2, Residence-Two Family EXISTING USE VACANT t. . PROPOSED USE MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY COMMENTS . . . „.. . 17 ' '/". gril/t7/1/A- •• • • S " CF/CHG ASSOCIATES- REZON Z J ` E ' . ' v ' S`7'-'. FILE NUMBER R-131-80 ....,.,A.., ,�,' ', so. \\ �-ss,..D Pei \ o • R' y \, , \c a� r v 6 - `SGs o9 ��•5 lo•�Z �"• /0„e ,-2,Oo. �` R-2 to � R-3 • - (t(2.0,92 Acres) ;.: ZO �� C �I'��' 1'R 67,0,,,...9', (�' ij4 I - o . P H A S E- E ,.X H I 0 R-1 to R-3 - � (0. 189 Acre„) k:`: • , . / • ,-- - , . - .7., . !, ' -1, ,....-e, - . _zob100__mgre: tA11100-' . . ' - .)) • ' ;'-*•. - :in-7--- -i/4.5:'I' '''.. .a ii . ' • ti _ �1 �� 000 !��• '1, \- D y�� 'a,"87,o,7 "c)ap, `\ a t,%_• .` KVO ` /c,i . \4; 4 ,ff6cA S'ti1is7;10f/z. -r- ,, l c,..., 40 .VI°r' ri`u'f' ... A, • 1 !�r° : �j,' f/O 1�•,,e'' Z 0-® .. 1, ,}o '/' (��rn,� c0 / �V "O `� / -5-.9, + f/ , Ir . ® � /, S ' /� W , /� J /' '1L O�// COL¢„w R-1 o R-2 -� ,_ 09 �4 ,f) ri O / < (0.064 .Acres) - - / . ,S , c,. °J \';.)v / '• z V . CP/ , .1 / / '.-'� 0'•0� /. • ` - R:IeG�how N '. 2 �-/ \ n n a , ��-. ,ii REVIEWING DEPARTMEV- -IIVISION : POLICE XXX Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved I . 'D' PERSSON A/5/80 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; >x Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved /2.4.31d-v Signature of Directo o Autho'ried Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; p/J va / A�' k7jitree -/ki. Approved 17 Approved with Conditions Not Approved Pa yk e /- ,� 11 v i �,� wt c �y v 7 (L,, 7 1 ci le).-1,,Ir.rC4 � ' /-Y. Q e'� Q' ai'Itr$ e / 7/c_� ��, - �A1_,✓✓ wac, S 0 1 \ • G / 7_,...., /--6 y 8y Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 19/215/80 Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : RE•76 mre GR. 13!•P0 REtto.osi in, peept,g2 PVe s A—I 4) - # A ' N(Cur & w a v a ep Ike' ��• q Location : Veeesinto ® N! / . S /t , /so Applicant: r (us oS. cr/ 6 /foe et es TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 11)100 Police Department A, R,C, MEETING DATE : = _; f''= 4:; , Public Works Department St IA Engineering Division ir3lioga Traffic Engineering 8Ae • lattAt. 1t « Buil ing Division Utilities Engineering r I Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITINGREVIEW If OAP AT 9:UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO AITEND THE ARC, PLE I E TF5 COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : \b Q o -f . I Approved (/ Approved with Conditions Not Approved /- Si-r-e_ GYe ar/ e ..r t access gait c-, weete� ©r te, ,�r� Wow gz 1-01)it e /`i'vP. lU C'1 li-Wrack/ - /, r2:4 p- ate -v A.,i,.._i Signature of Director or Author •d Represent tive Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: LgirLiTsi Ocr i Approved --/r Approved with Conditions Not Approved r,, liw/rsto Apo/lode/3 corral_ Pumps i-7 -Si Signature of irector or Authorized Representative Date V "v• • , _ .2 • • Vitt 1 ',. - ;,:',-„, ..-.1 -i e% -4.,. 4?, tf,lk • -0' , ,, , , t-1-..• '''.','+'.',.;1 •,C. ' ,' n .,,4 f‘•/, W4 •:''2v,.Z.1','?g10.;4.• p :rit t'" 'CA k:1;0%triW !AI' veV4 0,7' ,,,i4 F.0 to•• . 4,,'*1 4aeriV.i''',1#"'' • ''"lv:4 le ri. 4." 4',4*t "11.7.; i;;;• 1,4 riff '4 .4 4. ' .1 :,'„! A '',...: -,' 4',w . ''.:1--- -•ri 'v.,' •1' .-:-it ., WI,, ''',•1','. P. .-4r,%,-, 1 .,r.,,, -, . 'il •, • ,, •,,,„ i.,1 -.•,,,,, f!,t.7,.J1i ''.:r.,II '',..".,,*., r4,' '''' ' ' 9 ;.'''' 1 t.''1.:,'''''k",',. '' ,„''',..* •::;", "-z 4441 1..e, 4C-L-1,',",:f Y' 1:V . :,. ' :` i',.' '`•- '-t . ..i'' ..f,' • '.-, f : ' "'', ,'v, „ pf,' ';,, * :Y,'„,1 ;"'i: • - ' ,e' ,r-,? ten ",:.i; •7 t 7 •,i1r 4"":t% I. ' ' ' . ''*'''' ..;::','0 'V ' ' I .:.,' ' '''. t4:,:I, Er= ,' ,' ' -..t", • GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY. OF !'513 STEVENS AVENUE S.W. AND 150 FEET RADIUS OF THAT PROPERTY .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: . . LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN. THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT • I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OANNERC:, tO• F ... .;,..., '4- 4 ,v1 v,v '", ..:„; ,-,. :,- I TA, ' ,.,., . , yliVf Pv5 ;'• '11P,',,' .,- if,,,, ,.:0. '`!:.-„,:::',, K , . .4 11,0 . ..,Tr, , -',.-•". '...,,., ;:,,, .--•'.,- , 2 - ,,,, •• : .,,,. ..•••z,,,:% 5%,...,2: . c,.,,, • • • ,,. • . . TO BE HELD • . . IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL SI-UILIPING • ON ARI.„..aamLipaul: BEGINNING AT ...........2.0.1_,._.A.M. RM. • .. CONCERNUG ITE,, ,,!. at • .0.•. • APPLICATION FOR REZONE OF PROPERTIES FROM R-I TO A •R-2 AND R-1 AND R-2 TO R3 .. ,Ilk f„„ '.';`:11' : 1).•'.., .41k-'j•,. :'''' K' '''"1 i 1, ' f t' .• ,,,,,, .-•, _,_, ,,,,,„ -.,•_„,. ,., . ,.!!'. r, i!,1, , , . ,:ii` 1.#;.' ,f,7.: '' ._:lia."4'.'.:7. F1,1.,':L '''. '::''',',' ':4.k ,..4:' ,1.1\v,1 '-;} t, j 4 I: .'41 ., ., r 1.• ' . • I, ' ,1' '' '''-.'', ' '.1 ' MI ' EIS ISSUED IN- 1979 - COPY FOR. RtVW qPRX:.AVAILABLE IN PLANNING • ..-:•„.-A - FOR RImTHE,i''' INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT T,,e) BE i!4i.."-,MOV,P---) WITHOUT. PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 20, 1981, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. CF/CHG ASSOCIATES Application for rezone of properties from R-1 to R-2 and R-1 and R-2 to R-3 for use as multi-family residential Planned Unit Development, File R-131-80; property located in the vicinity of 513 Stevens Avenue S.W. and 150 feet radius of that property. 2. DAVIS, GARY Applications for two-lot short plat approval, File 118-80, and Exception to the Subdivision Ordinance regarding roadway width along N.E. 24th Street, File E-139-80; property located on the northwest corner of North 24th Street and Meadow Avenue North. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 20, 1981, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: January 9, 1981 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTIES DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 5th day of January, 1981. L � Signed: ,ate Vg?..41-1.44.0vt. `1n 1 ��l�t , Steve Munson Assistant Planner OF R�-v 464 o THE CITY OF RENTON ®e `� ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o • .v BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT '9•0 235- 2550 • 0,9.'eo (c•P January 5, 1981 CF/CHG Associates One CHG Plaza 200 South 333rd Street • Federal Way, Washington 98003 Re: Application for rezone of properties from R-1 to R-2 and R-1 and R-2 to R-3 for use as multi-family residential Planned Unit Development, File R-131-80; property located in the vicinity of 513 Stevens Avenue S.W. and 150 feet radius of that property. Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above • mentioned application on January 5,. 198.1. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been set for January 20, 1981 at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the-Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. • Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director • ` R By: ik;G ��. > _r,Y;; ,} ). Ro• - J. al aylock, Associate Planner ' RJB:yb _ _ • 1 Date circulated : %e9� 3/8® Comments due : /=2 y�'8 4) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET E C F - j ?� - 8 APPLICATION No (s ) . ' l Jl-e9O PROPONENT : of/C I/e5- /j$0er-et 3 PROJECT TITLE : Rey (& r/,>i,,) ? Wei Aiore J4�) Brief Description of Project : i2 ,cpe5I / Leag, p �, 4 p-t .;A- A 4- 3 1,,.- Or; e 190 .1). ' LOCATION :(l l t<<` t17 d [ S? cJ'G O6t S A V E'. -%/ 414,A Ar /'drli v s ors. SITE AREA : 'jt R.3414.thr� BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 4,- 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : ✓. _ COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed �� I Title : Date : ( Z/z-3 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulates . ,�p 3/8° Comments due : /c07 /(9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - - g® APPLICATION No(s) . /31-ege) ° PROPONENT : C % `• Oe Qf� PROJECT TITLE : ReP,7z4? 4544(71r4P1 le4,041,p�e4, . 4,0r Brief Description of Project : 4c,42 / L e9.`�, r psi t / - 4-3 r ef g e t Ai 4,/$ '- e'! &A1. LOCATION : `ei` • 3 e5A.®Be.0 AVe', -%0 41‘ie'sli �t�e v s ® 311 SITE AREA: rx ..3Vczev 's BUILDING AREA .(gross) . DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT ,REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : v- 5 ) Animal life: 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : • 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: • west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts: 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : ✓. ,_ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : t--` 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI_ DOS More Information Reviewed by : .Title : Date : FORM: ERC-06 i 1 Date circulated W)3/80 Comments due : 42/..2144® ENIVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF o - �® APPLICATION No (s ) . , P /3( 9O r� PROPONENT :_ . . _� a . ®C' `Q PROJECT TITLE : 1 Re.zr,,ie (64ariffIATI4vg Brief Description of Project : 9 ie '�P 4 A- A .4- ,- co et • LOCATION :Yee/toll O� .. / ¢S)404, ,C A Pi'e. 414i��/ Nadiv Of:3,142 SITE AREA : R....SY4Leiv.50 BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) • Water & water 'courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life: • 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : • south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends (ITE) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : • 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation: 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI_ DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : tr4 Date : �o- • FORM: ERC-06 Date circulatecis- / / 3/8O Comments due : 42/z ./c ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 6?p - SO APPLICATION No (s) . 4-- /3(—e:9 PROPONENT : o f/C ' g®C'r'i4 3 PROJECT TITLE : ?e,z / r/(y,? , la 41 A e4,4) Brief Description of Project : gastre-SJ I . ! LeIie.5,# SS 12-t A- A 4- 3 p- e Apoo14.,. 4.1g•IiV:$0 9 L0CATI0N :f/1'Ci"�je �� t c5lp t Ave, - 414./4I/✓ ,414.s 0f3, F� ° SITE AREA: a 3 VeZtlftr$ BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes: 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5) Animal life: 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : I 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: • west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : I s .13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS: _ Recommendation : DNSI�/� DOS More Information Reviewed by : l L ,-45 son Title : Date : 1/41$0 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulate_ _ 1di/53/80 Comments due : /4z2 R® ENlVIR0NMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - Kj $ - g APPLICATION No(s) . LW-So PROPONENT : ef/ewey A500.-0,43 PROJECT TITLE : /4C7,7+ ' /1 c¢y- 11rg , 1 ,41 014,41e,, ) Brief Description of Project : gQ, C / tt9tbation,20,..5,14 p-t A- A 4- 3 4)p- vge o trravel evire P. LOCATION :/ estg (4 e! �� 6Yee•Got r ,e. `;moo 4144y1lr edrelii.s SITE AREA : 'f a Ycttbv'$ BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE _ INFO 1 ) Topographic changes: • ✓ T 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : ✓ - 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : `� I 10) Risk of upset : 1 • 11 ) Population/Employment : / 12 ) Number of Dwellings : _ 13) Trip ends (ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15) Energy : / 16) Utilities : / 17) Human health : / 18) Aesthetics : / 19) Recreation: / 20) Archeology/history : / COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI -/ DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : LEA° 04' c'lc Date : 1 -7—g FORM: ERC-06 Date circulates_ -/ 3/80 Comments cue : /4/;21.44Pe) ENVIRO IENTAL. CHECKLIST REVIEU .SHEET ECF - 9 _ 1D APPLICATION No(s) . A— f 3/-40 PROPONENT : eF/C/45- 500rf/4 g PROJECT TITLE : Qeyr,n..ie / zr/r.,v4,, l?4 , i!1 r r�pe.,. 441, Brief Description of' Project : ACe4254 , iti.etit .P..1,/4 4......, p--t ;A- A 4 - 3 a,- trga •2 5 medA4••- Cava .-61 j90A LOCATION :V 'co` , � Si cSI c m, ' Ace, --ai l 4i4),vro :006, �r, SITE AREA : 'f o`? -SY62.CP9.S BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO . 1 ) Topographic changes : i 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : fj 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : t/ 5 ) Animal life: c/ 6) Noise : v 7) Light & glare : c,/ 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset : (/ 11 ) Population/Employment : (/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : c// _ 13) Trip ends (ITE ) : . traffic impacts : • i/ 14) Public services : I ,/ 15) Energy : 16) Utilities: 1----- 17) Human health: _ !/ 18) Aesthetics : (/ 19) Recreation : l/- 20) Archeology/history : 1 COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI v DOS More Information Reviewed by : �N,1 Title : c;t^ � . s Date : 4; c_ � J - _ FORM: ERC-06 MEMORANDUM OF CONCURRENCE APPLICATION NO(s) : R-131-80 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request to rezone properties from R-1 and R-2 to R-3 for uses as multi- family residential P.U.D. PROPONENT: CF/CHG Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Vicinity of 513 Stevens Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: January 7 , 1981 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under The Final Environmental Imapct Statement are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental review is still valid per the mitigating measures addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement. This decision was reached following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-639-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Impact Statement: Earlington Woods P.U.D. dated: March 1979 2) Application (s) : R-131-80 SIGNATURES : /1:47-/ 7 ftald G. Ne son, Building id . emens, Acting irector Planning Director Richard C. Houghtonting Public Works Director MEMORAMDUM OF C®1NJCURRECE APPLICATION NO(s) : R-131 -80 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request to rezone properties from R-1 and R-2 to R-3 for uses as multi- family residential P.U.D. PROPONENT: CF/CHG Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Vicinity of 513 Stevens Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: January 7 , 1981 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under The Final Environmental Imapct Statement are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental review is still valid per the mitigating measures addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement. This decision was reached following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-639-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Impact Statement: Earlington Woods P.U.D. dated: March 1979 2) Application (s) : R-131-80 SIGNATURES: j r g..-',..7//, 6 A,v�-- "Po2L / / 7 ,4.�iftil G. Ne son, Building id . lemens, Acting "g irector Planning Director f1/c--t/ (4-4—t.c._ t_.-et--,y R'chard C. Houghton; cting Public Works Director MEMORANDUM OF CONCURRENCE APPLICATION NO(s) : R-131-80 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request to rezone properties from R-1 and R-2 to R-3 for uses as multi- family residential P.U.D. PROPONENT: CF/CHG Associates LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Vicinity of 513 Stevens Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: Planning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: January 7 , 1981 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under The Final Environmental Imapct Statement are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental review is still valid per the mitigating measures addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement. This decision was reached following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-639-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Impact Statement: Earlington Woods P.U.D. dated: March 1979 2) Application (s) : R-131-80 SIGNATURES: A21. 6-.— PoiC_ d G. Ne son, Building id lemens, Acting irector Planning Director 1. 11 Rilchard C. Houghton; cting Public Works Director ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DECEMBER 24 , 1980 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9; 00 A.M. : FOURTH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS : JAMES BANKER (ECF-623-80, SP-111-80) MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. (ECF-567-80, SP-U47-80) VALLEY OFFICE PARK, PARK II (ECF-602-80, SA-092-80) OLD BUSINESS: SA-126-80 SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION ( "THE ECF-636-80 650 Building") Application for site approval for proposed 5-story +88,000 sq. ft. office building in the M-P zone, with parking for 440 vehicles; property located 650 S.W. 7th Street. NEW BUSINESS: R-131-80 CF/CHG ASSOCIATES ECF-638-80 Application to rezone properties from R-1 and R-2 to R-3 for use as multi-family residential P.U.D. ; property located in the vicinity of 513 Stevens Avenue S.W. and 150' radius of that property. PPUD-132-80 CF/CHG ASSOCIATES ECF-639-80 Application for residential use portion of preliminary P.U.D. (Phase I) ; property located on the west side of Hardie Aveune S.W. between Sunset Blvd. S.W. and Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-way. PPUD-133-80 CF/CHG ASSOCIATES ECF-639-80 Application for commercial and office use portion of Preliminary P.U.D. (Phase II) ; property located on the west side of Hardie Ave. S.W. , north of Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-way - east of proposed Maple Ave. S.W. CITY OF RENTON • R :_7ONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. 7-f-Ae/-ec6 EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO . CITY CQCC_4 _ IL ACTION FILING DATE 0 ' 0 NIGLE ft;' \ND DATE HEARING DATE V> difieD�O\ , �SEC 17 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS, l THROUGH 10 :' 1980 11 1 . Name CF/CHG Associates \ if� ph t ' 838-1200 G • .. ilso Address 200 South 333rd Street, Federal Way, WA '�_� es_.--:., • • 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on 513 Stevens Avenue SW 'kv..xynxectxt and 150' Radius of that soul property as shown on attached legal descriptions and maps 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 2.34 Acres • 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) See Attached Sheets. . • 6 . Existing 'Zoning R-1 and R-2 Zoning Requested ,R-3 NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form • in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Multi-family residential planned unit development. Property • is located within the boundaries Of the approved PPUD being developed by applicant/owner. 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Property will be developed consistent with the approved rezone and PPUD for the surrounding property. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Development will occur concurrent with surrounding PUD already being developed. 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. • Planning Dept. 1-77 I . AFFIDAVIT 1, CF/CHG Associates , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 12th day of December , 19 80 , • • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residingat (� 1 CF/CHG �s.ociates, 9 P(��c�l�� A Was ,. � on Joint Venture CH ,' nt'- ational , Inc. , General Partner eKatiitt (Name of) Notary Public) / (Signl e of Owner) Henry W; l.riffin Executive: Vice President • 'all Melt to() S-4(eQ* Sault 20c SoLW 333rd Street (Address) (M•re s) Federal liay, Washington . (City) (State) 206-838-1200 \ (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular .and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing o.,.ftrrapplication . / ®� R`��1/a�\ ' Date Received F\ Fb 09 9 By: OEC 17 198U • �9 4/ Renton Planning Dept . �� 2-73 -,LNG DE?R• ECENEo 1? 198U -! :.1:c �z PLANNING AND DES I . 9ti�ijNG pP��i December 5, 1980 PARCEL "A-A" - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF R-2 TRANSITION ZONE PROPERTY TO BE REZONED TO R-3 ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF EARLINGTON, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF PLATS, PAGE 7 (A.F. #433749) , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 6TH PLACE AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 25, BLOCK 15, OF SAID PLAT OF EARLINGTON; THENCE N 71°32 '09" W ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 6TH PLACE A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N 18°27' 51 " E A DISTANCE OF 138.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS S 71°32'09" E A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00" AN ARC LENGTH OF 235.62 FEET; THENCE S 71°32'09" E A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE RIGHT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS S 18°27' 51 " W A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 83°42 '41 " , AN ARC LENGTH OF 219. 16 FEET; THENCE N 77°00'24" W A DISTANCE OF 53.64 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS S 12°59'36" W A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°41 '45" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.16 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 26, BLOCK 15, PLAT OF EARLINGTON; THENCE N 18°27'51 " E ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 26 A DISTANCE OF 36.02 FEET; THENCE N 71°32'09" W A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; THENCE S 18°27 '51 " W A DISTANCE OF 138.00 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 6TH PLACE AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE - WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 25, BLOCK 15, PLAT OF EARLINGTON; THENCE S 71°32'09" E ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 6TH PLACE A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE S 18°27'51 " W A DISTANCE OF 145.34 FEET TO A ONE CI IC I'l.,^./_ \ 20O 5OU III 3 i_i S I I l.L I I I 1)I RAI \\'AY,\\'ASI IN(;ION 9R003 _'(1! ii I ' . PAGE 2 PARCEL "A-A" POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY. LINE OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD AS SHOWN ON THE MAIN LINE RIGHT-OF-•WAY AND TRACK MAP, PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD, SHEET 5 OF 11 , VOLUME 2 - WASHINGTON, RECORDS OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD: THENCE N 71°29'12" W A DISTANCE OF 77.35 FEET TO A NONTANGENT POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THEiRIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS N 32°53'00" E A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 197.87 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 75°34'51 " TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. CONTAINING 91 ,137.51 SQUARE FEET, 2.092 ACRES. KEIVED. )o r)EC 17 1980 :k-z9i12 //�� r CI L PLANNING AND DEL) I December 5, 1980 PARCEL "B-B" - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TAYLOR PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM R"-1 TO R-3 ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF EARLINGTON, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF PLATS, PAGE 7 (A.F. 1/433749) , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 6TH PLACE AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 25, BLOCK 15, OF SAID PLAT OF EARLINGTON; THENCE N 18°27 '51 " E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 25 A DISTANCE OF 138.00 FEET; THENCE S 71°32 '09" E A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; THENCE S 18°27 ' 51 " W ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 26, BLOCK 15, OF SAID PLAT OF EARLINGTON A DISTANCE OF 36.02 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS S 28°42 '09" E A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 112.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42°50'09" ; THENCE N 71°32'09" W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 6TH PLACE A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. O F R��, : pECEII/Eo CONTAINING 8,238.61 SQUARE FEET, 0.189 ACRES. "Z.. . DEC 17 198o )1 ''''.-,9 4/1 VG DEP1 0N1 (:I I(. 1,1,\/,\ 200 S(?1)I I (4";S I ICI I I 1 1 1)I I;;\I WAY,WAS) II,NC;ION 0800_i 2(H1 tt hi-I?(v r PLANNING AND DESIi December 12, 1980 PARCEL "D-D" - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TAYLOR PROPERTY R-1 TO R-2 TRANSITION. ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL ESTATE SITUATE IN THE CITY OF.RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, BEING A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF EARLINGTON, RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF PLATS, PAGE 7 (A.F. #433749) , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTHWEST 6TH PLACE AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 26, BLOCK 15, OF SAID PLAT OF EARLINGTON; THENCE N 18°27' 51 " E ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 26 A DISTANCE OF 101 .98 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE LEFT THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS S 28°42 '09" E A RADIAL DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT AN ARC DISTANCE OF 112.14 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 42°50'09" ; THENCE S 71°32'09" E ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST 6TH PLACE A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Q FR�� ECE1\! 0 CONTAINING 2,801 .39 SQUARE FEET, 0.064 ACRES, r)EC 171980 ONI:CI I(; I'I_i\7i\ 200 SOUTH i i i S I KI-I I I I Di I \I \\;AY,\'VASI INCI I ON 98003 201. 0;8-'12UO ram/ g oX ' i' (O� b; al.. t.q' Z. i" / 1:.,/ 6°' )I%* . 1\ 4 4'..') •('(0'/ ')i(F 7 ' 5':510/ 7 .2., . / _.,?' (1° G' eiavw 1 •• eg t,' o • 41 4 ce<4 A , I 9 ISfi/61t� ti� � k. „Ill 11:00. 100 ,1,4,_iloritillhix .!' 2.„ . .-_:Aatoloceloritilk .ce 03 ;:•( 'ilkf\ ' AI* • ' ,c' '•44 *10r-` A1011111.°' \\1.; li El lHX3 ' ov b 0 ti .. H d ti pr /�S e' O 1 _fib4,.), �O, .�i OZ d, ` ��0 g9 ^� Q•� . I'b t 0 ' \%. pe....A,,,,,AP.P-01:eseS, N---->. 'c- zk,,,'aP,....,er/ _40) '\ / �n/ ....<- . 7. 6)." r,b70, es E y cy i4A \ r •/� •L 7, \9- ' . N1• 4 4% /JP0 - a 4s - ._ f s� —TY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON EMIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM -, �,,/76.4,,,,,44' RED. r�j', �,„, DEC 17 1980 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY .� "'�-'"" -^ .. , Application No. ,Nn Environmental Checklist No. .��.,/- r_ PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available t.o you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or- studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencie-s which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND - - -- 1. Name of Proponent CF/CHG Associates 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: One CHG Plaza, 200 South 333rd Street Federal Way, WA 98003 - (206) 838-1200 - 3. Date Checklist submitted December 17. 1q20 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Planning fPpartmpnt 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Earlington Woods 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Rezone totaling + 2.34 acres consistant with LISP of cu rroundincj property owned by applicant. ThP FiS prepared for the nriginal property (+ 46.3 acres) is applicable to this site. This EIS is on file with the City of Renton. No further comments under environmental impacts are necessary. -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Lot is internal to the development located approximately at tha renter of the Earlington Woods project. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Approximately one year from approval of PPUD 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Preliminary PUD approval , building permits and final PUD approval . 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain: Yes - Final PUD plans will be submitted. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Attached are the copies of the original rezone and environmental checklist for the 46.3 acre site owned by applicant. EIS is on File at the City. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ES MAYBE NO (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES- MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MBE NO Explanation:, o ;ITT-OJ1• D o (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: SEC 1 ? 1980 (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambien air i quality? �._r" --YES YBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . (i1`/� G` 1-)EP MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: - (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in-either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,. o,r other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE NO _ _______ Explanation: • (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , m icroflora and aquatic plants)? YES FIAMT NO • (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area., or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE flO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1. -4- E, (5•) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO _ _ _ Expl Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO _ Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NO _ __Explanation: - - (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the _.- _ _present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (9,) Natural Resources. Wi11 the proposal result in: _ __(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO _Expl anati on: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO __ _ _ -.Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MATTE _.. _.. --- _ Exp-l.a_na_t.ion: -55- :.y r 'IL 14, ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing hos1`�pg , oru;LJ¢j� create a demand for additional housing? r"i YES 416yeBE NO )E.0 17isp ): Explanation. (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO •' (c) Water? _ YES MAYBE NO .31 -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive • site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO -Explanation: • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? . YES M YBE NO Explanation: • III. SIGNATURE • I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that -the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: signed) Director, Planning & Design Randall Potter (name printed) ti City of Renton Planning Department 5-76