Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA81-009 • BEGINNINU OF FILE FILE TITLE r , a �sy ` fi3ti ED .0 • • I { • • - {F°,-,...:,';•7^y'L- ?-:--aS;i 'a, rii,Yk ,!—..,.5:;; ,, ,c,!„„...:,:,-:1.,,i1:1,4: 7:1,,i;a ' "wi"rN,.'4,,.`; '•li:, C14-, 11,'i;34:.:.' iti,,Rr '13it`'.ii1 7:": •'}' .,!'.• • _ .,'.:k;�C,:il,'. ,i �:.:. ,:...S,t•i:ems., ,�;Y, �• •' :1':¶ k. ',arl.,•'.IAI'.:i 2iaA+.,r:'_ 'Y''t'irt�r�: i •�AtK i.,,•+3' ':i�V@.S•1'. `I,(,',V,•.•':` 'tfu'''d;';• 1 • r • ; alai•' i'- 41 { Mt yiy y '{ i ,`. Applicant HENRY DAUBERT , ' R-009-81 en, >,.i;; t;; File No. rf .,,,4 I Project Name SAME tsera>..4 ','" ' Property Locationit Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue S. .,, ;�:°`�` 'and S. 7th Street • • kr-rt..,.V.:x..,.:T:::f.,`'` ` HEARING EXAMINER: Date 3-10-81 '''' Denial , 1a,ta`:i„',= ` Recommendation f7 ;tfi. i1$x yss` t'::. `;. Re /Rec. Date Received Date Response t!. • ,;; • Appeal - Date Received ^ y i % IY,4, 4 C I Ul ;p.,:,' Council A Ate / 1 ..I N (,:�• . 35 L) 9 Date (1//$ I K„ih _ - Ordinance/ . ?,,. My l a r to County for Recording rp: ` : . , Lr• Mylar Recording # • •i'fa:" Remarks: �•,',i;;' , ri::' • 1' 'a.t- • k,f fj ,•- 'sl`t It • r fi : - 7Y e 4 j1 ti l'tiY, ''d'•,.rl?, • - ;;; .i:::i :ii f,.' , �M1I, .[.I ^ • • _ :.fib 'i'` • J • • • i'k%` faci �t t. of ,• :Y.•• ;.1,,H i _� ;.. �,.r'?`t:'', ,f:r•!y.;A i�,).ct..."../•. - e ! tal/"I'••i' :;,.•t�S-.r]' �f.. :'i.`. • �,.1.,�,..1,, nttO ,: `1 ��1"I •F.. 1 It )thp{; F n 4�1' , j „.. : ____.' t.-- .... -,....., . . . rn - , - , Jai ek21 t i __.�� . . . . . . . . t . . .. . . , . . .. . .• . . ..„ . . . . . .... . . .. . . . . . . . -4 ��_ 7. .. .. :. . . . . . . , v • • .! .. . . t . i I .- .. • • m irlaN 1 -C1 C . . F . . . . . . . . . . . ... � '�'- ,,,,, p. gall . , i . . . , . .. .. . .,. . ._ . . , . , . „ - ,. . E . . • . .. . . . . . -. tI • • . _ . . . . . • . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . _ . ._. . . . . . •• . ,... , b _ Y _ `s _ 41114. I 4‘0,-* r 42111111VVIr w....ow, IDA0111I . ..__. . .,.. _ . _,.. _ . 'REZit4i N ..............._ --,- 5 1 11141 Sit �,rrc> -itict i-5T1)....leor . . + . ‘z,:p ? ct- - R CITY OFECE tIENTON HEARING EXAMINER FEB2 �`' 1981 5, • \ ' . . -t. 1—.s. .4 1 . t.1 110 r illi/III.1L_-4 A'ii. l 0i t 7a8a9alQallsl.?a1a2a3a4aC ;jji / . . .............. eta . 1 T� —f ir iii # sfpd ., ii . 10..\.. ._ 29,_,<, qs , i ,_ , tt .,,. , P. j i , a . (r __ _ 1 • w , r tt 3 _p\ \ e.9o .S4 -es w S- C --, C G . L ' _—e \ q.7 i \ 07,2., , .. ., • ... „, r---,-,) 0, .. - ____. . , f 1 {t � / •,°os G 1D , r _ % , ^ ' T ---VaDov * iii,k, ii \ ,-,--1, t [i., , .. / *-*Lo t1 ,_ , ' It-- S(14:41<b:y 7:( e , , . tt -.1 . - ..' _,T.,- �'R 1 1`:. � 4A �S-,1 Pr V ` ij r _.07 ~ i t R #, i ra *ep6-13�� • t JO Act ‘ ‘13:"2 ... 1:11 4::=23 c_48_., 1331. 36 ' � i r-i '� y""� 'A 3 t ,+F- n :'' , Fy+p ''.c.` ti ;0Nz 1.iMiTS OR) Q-7 '•� t-----� 4. s e: , IMMIIIMINIIIIIIIIIIIIMINIII ' It... s - . ems' ' qy • ,4,,,ett -,, 1L. -„li . ,.1 4i14. 4:51/44' \ r , __, -,,---)/ 14: -) 1•. 5 In N `J J t J - - r NT;' " ''' I Oi \ I .si 1,-.41. . :4 be . ti \ P9 r ;.4 : l ' O .....4.•4. . ._• ._.. ., a A 7. t... • \ \ ,./ / . smal .4 . ,41.____I _ .,,i ,.. Irl ' :/ej;? \ , / 1 ,--.1 f r All .F fir •r T I- + •'I � I .• ,a.x . • ,-- L-1 a N\ � \\ P a� Li' I f1a•.. • NMI �T rw / . ,(:'T,p� �7 - ■ �� JC r Ir \ rt R:;4 c .,., : B-I I ' L- 1 63 j1, ,,, � �72� S-� f r . v- -� L. _moo ,�.. E.. T i UP .L4 ri �■ 1. .J aT• Pill « . 1�. L S'T ��}}�� R 17 9 fw 3.. .f T .3 . ), B-I 15.1 1 . 1-- .1,E -1-:_-_,- , ! imt,......"----It- , -I ' s 4 'i- fi•- '„17714, . ..4.,,s,,4.JrI - T•;fr►•.�* ` ' I` , �m,l �• fa R�2j 3 OINK jw.,r,ot I, , _ic �� S ..Ooi ScwOw♦... * , Fr- a•u lihr AM 1114)",), , . .0.4;41.7.;,.. i• .,I i.3.3 i kap-I li i _ __t . -.7 '141.:V., 1,p.i..!1°41 Ow ,` ' /1. • a , :,4f.l -t ;, --') // R •'" , !1 iri7p.41r..„,„ 1 ri idiii3,, , ,1•, Ai /R ,-3' bI_7r-- l ' , 1 l..a/,/.1- i'c,t.. •'i..A. -,l 97,,. ,l 4,b-"---' L�} ice -1 c- �,y,; _•<i1 r,_P. 1 , se r eL VD W, , J °Z O ,HV ' "1 y#1, E s '. sliiiit,Z) -L_- 7^� t .'A . S or GE of Ifs .,r a P A, .ZT . Li 7j,k_. iiF . ;--- f 0 - - ,- ..4 ir, Ps IF tii 't4v ' ..4- '', _.. t,. ,• «l; t9+r- 8. '. ;= .. r_ i`._ 1, fade • I .„ J S w 77Li — ..1 .-_ _ E3-I svel'ilfro ,' -i• • . R , .1.:, • - 5, L- I girl* - , A , , 11 I ZONE USE MIN LOT ZONE • USE MIN LOT SCALE 1 "=8001 � � R-1 Sing. Fam. Res. 7200 SR-2 Two Fam. Res. 10000 SECTION i SR-1 Sing. Fam. Res. 7500 R-3 Mulit-Fam. Res. 5000 G Sing. Fam. Res. 35000 R-4 Multi-Fam. Res. 5000 G-6000 Sing. Fam. Res. 6000 P-1 Public Use i G-7200 Sing. Fam. Res. 7200 B-1 Business • G-8400 Sing. Fam. Res. 8400 BP Business Parking PAGE G-9600 Sing. Fam. Res. 9600 L-1 Light Industry GS-1 Sing. Fam. Res. 35000 H-1 Heavy Industry i 2 Sing. Fam. Res. 40000 T Trailer Park SR_ Two Fam. Res. 7200 13 M-P Manufacturing Park • }lat*Qt4 a nag - ,�1 Q�i°' )%111•0-4\ ill 47 wi 111 n rqcUr.I s 4 .INI Z-7:0.14 , 4N P+q r"1 4 11621qPIrPOOro4 UM . W1100, 1 ti. virelniqvg eettlf ',WO 5.1/ne)optel iv au*/ 7 iu.,, 0 ,..,,, ,,s, 4..._,...... 0),„ ,G,,,,, ,, rw 4.14`441V r—, S .�-/ Q C7Wl Q o I Piv1, TN: ,i, Eiv Ei 0 0 ,---ii, ID 1 * \ of Esi 0 I Q n A \ , = ; Li"Aj ri \ 4 \ , i \\ . --ic CI \ \ \ i uri kArt- z 2 2:12 up - .;-1 1 /n,nv3 .);. \ Q Q k , \Ie., m O U El . . „. , .. . . , , .•,,,•-,,:...,•:,.,„.;. . ,;:',,.,',..-:,‘;',',.*:".,,,,!,•;',',..-...t,;?,,,,,,,.>:,:,•.,'.."-...!.A.••-t,.;..,,•;%...e• ,,(.• 4•,••••,•;.,,;,•-•.-A'i.fi 1.....1.t.,_-_,..,;•',': . •.- i • , ' .-•. •••••,,,‘,1-.••:',rf,'-,1,4::',.;;;;7.7:=,.*, ;•,•,.i,i••,•i•:•..,•,-..-,0,,'•,,,:•;.11_,.,,..:•••,;‘)1,,,ii:Vi.•:6;n:x.!..;14;.;,3•••,4,-..1•47.,;."-qt4.,••4A•4s,:,,•-•.,•;',•,.,..:•:,•,',. . , ..1,....,, ..• . •,,, ..„,,,ti,;•,-,•,',,••,-.,-,2,,, ,c,.<,,!!•,..;..,••.i,:v1,;,,2...,,d,•;•••••%:,:-.,..i. , .. ,..n,-;;,-ir..•,ag.:;••,,,tvily4•yr,Az,,;;;• ; ;;;.,c, ,,,,,f:;•&•,;,.?,,v,,..,. .;..:,,,,.,,,,,1•!..;,.;_ • . ;41;-, . , ,,:: ,:i,,,•.;.,,,,,,..,:_,„...,:;,...... , ,-:,;;,,,....• ;',,,,-„ti-irt'*i;e1. ,,;J.•,,,,.4,-.,,•:0,:-.-0,,,,,;(,?k,-.. ,:..,41-:,,,,4,1,4T",....,,,m,,IF-„,i-„•4:,., ...:',;.• •••$•,.e.t.,,11.4,,v"Xi',',.•-•:•:,'"!•-•-,1-.4•',', • - -1,',,' ',1,:‘,•',.•••••,,••-••:,-:.4.••••••:•...4.,,,,,,.,-!:•-•:•••;,,;,,, s,•1•••.;i!-01-4,.;;:::‘-,1.,••41,,•,,,,:l.. ...,:igr,s..or,-;.L•4,;,..u.1*,;/:„.y•Lv...r.2.,,,,.v,,t;t4;;;r.,.,i..-.,,,, ,,I,-..,•.,.,. . . :. ...•?'4•;';,••••',-,-.-,;,•.::•.;•,:,.•.,,..,--,,,.:,.•:•,•,,,,e,A.s.:-..4•?,•?,,:•, ,,•,•,-,:-.,ce..•-•,•-i,p-.4:,-,-;;;.,•!•,,-,,,i4.1.1,1?-•33.1gfe:7..,,'-n;1•-•,.•;... .4..•,,N, ‘,--,',,,:'•o.?•.!-',,:.:,;',„,,:(4.10,,,I.,:',,•=;V.:-.,;.:57.y.:". ,. ' ;.-": .' ,., ,',.':.,,'..,,-,,f,:.',±f..i',..• *:..•;,1.;,1`..',.`,..,':.;,',,,..,-,',;.',.,.:.41erf•Vklkr),,,,.4,,t''.%,'0...,:r,,,,,,0,-;:z.,..w:N.:..:-q7,,,. .--,,viir*;.'..:i.r..., !,^;:'*'2.1,i5t=1.?-f;:-.1,1".-.,.?• :!,....... -,---, - -, .-,,,,..,,,:,f•,,q,;.-,,,,,,,,,4..,,,,,:,4....-"...,...A.,,,-;;;;;-,,,.. .,,-,.,,,....,,...0,..,...,4,,,,,,-- - ,,,,..- -,.. . ....1,..1......y..A• ,,,.1-4,..:.,;:;.e..,..,'„r...:.,--,..:;.---,,,,,,. ,., :-;...,,,., . - ,,....i t!:.,...:,-..,.,.,,,:t.1-,....:,•:,, •-,.,:,,-;,,z.t.,:•,-...i..,,r.:4t-Yasi',1:1:$,V,‘,.tc,014'6;11,14 1.2.C.-.• .?.....1„,..ti,tirylls.-,.i..k.1.44,;,-„ng.-:;i.... .,,:;,.,,,,:m.4,,,,-:,,...5 . . • , ii-,:h ,:'' ..-,.r,;,,-.!. .',"0',..'.7.".5-,i'.: .---','1:-Z'i', ..'..',Zil<':';';f0,11%:41,"•i'lt.k.'4.'-.1-$Airik"n$1.g',4;''''',?4,',ek.,.''1,"eir,t14,.._„1,4f12-344t1,P,,::.1,-,Me'.,?tel0:X--..,•,,K.;'i,.:;,..,:.'.,,•,. .- .. . lifig' .‘ ,,,,,,,.,.• .,,,,,,,,ii,,i,,...„,..„;,,,,,. ,., :,1,,,,,,,...,;,.,,,::;,,,5,-,447t,!;Zkik.U;,-e4Yi!.14:-,!,,..).3,,,#,S3.14V4T..0. 0,tr,,e,t„,..4;.41. 4,,,,,.,01t.p,t..*,4g.4„..W.1.c.:0;,,A1",i':-,,,,l;',- ., ; ''''' ..-6,11,s, 6.1•4 i':,i' , ..-.,,,.... 'r,,--,:,:,,,,..'4,',,,,,..:,pi' • .:•;-1,•-,•••••,gfir.,...,.•,,V.,,•:,,,,,,r:•••";,,•,,.43„..,,,,,c,;,,;,,,,,,,,r,7,,,f,,Sr#,,,-...;,,,,,.,(kt:''!*•.117".';,M%t,-1)P:S..0...ii",',„t‘;';:, -,;:^.-;'1'••,i,••-•:':!:•:.'0:,;•,•••. ' ,",•, • •,,. . -,•• ;,,,,,,,,.••.•,,,,...., .„,.......•,..orre•4-4,,...'-P,,,-",',•:',"'',-.1'"+m-:..t.•,,'"1,,/,'•,•'e'y%‘/P"J'''',WT,:-." '','- '''''''''illt'••'.1.,',,•''''4.-,"•'er'i''.3','cq•,-""e.•''' ''•'••''• ' `•'''' • o 't••"...-•,,,,,,,,,,r,;•••;,,,:;•-7::••,,',--,-,..•.,•',••••,--,:i:';',.-,-;1•,02:1'0,,:,,i•..,-'0,,-544., ,-,':',•:%,,••••°'1,,,•a..••••••,,;-•3,•'',Ly:..,-,.,4..,. '",:,•-•.,,l,r..:A:-4-.F.-•••••;,:vy.•.'',Yr.,',,,,.,-.. ,;;:•;,,,, .... .• . . . '',• . •,.,„ •• .:.,:-,,,,,-*4•.,'—1...r •.-re.•-..!`-,4•:,ii,..,,,,,n•;..:,,,,,''',,A••••i-,"Wr's,-L'e•-1-",&1••••°!,•-,,'‘e,t'•Lt•-'.4:5'-''•iii•••,?1,ef•t•-4/'r-,-,•-•,-.'•4..;• -n•'",XJ1-"1•••-''''''?•••"•••'';• ''''' ' -, ' ,•: , ,,,...'','",:t 0.-,3,,,,--•„'1.3:,,,,',':4.,-,-,-,.!•••"ttr-:.-••,,a1,-.‘ti-,,,..,....,,A,,,,...-.--.*•:41t.,;,a,,,,;,4-:-.,,,,,,,,kv,,:•,:rett.;:.,y7.:,,,, ,,,,t„..,,,,,,,,„,,m„.,,,,,y,,,,-..,g,,..,,,,,..,,.,,:),„0.-?...,..,,,•,... , ,- ... . ., . :'.,',.:'..,...:1-,,,:,,:::.-.4."?..!..‘,.,,,'.:.•.,,..,,,..:,:,,,.4,....4,:t.t.,..,g;,:,z,i-:..i..-g„1,..?,,,,,-;.,-;.......;,,,:,,,....;.1.4-,;,, ,,,-,,..ch,•.7.q.,,,„...i..,..;s1;;;7-,',4,;.t.y.,,4-,, ,,,,,z,.5.-,,,x-,:,,::7*.,,i,Z..q.,r,;-;:.,;',:1,,xi:4:.,,,....,...i.,,.,...„,:•.„-., ,.,•,„••••..•: ir:=4i'• ' ' '•••'. ., ,..•.::•-••o•4..,,,,,,• .•,.• ve-.t,.?.X.;^,,,;,,,e*:Y.,,,,,.4,..,-.,.-t.,,,,,....,14-..,....4.4..,.,...,4=,::,-,,,,...4,-,!,14.',,,, .k:"‘,/-54.4:.,..-.,r-',-,-*<1;;;4-_,--,-....y.-,,,,,,...,,, .., . ...,,.,. •,- .',-,:;,.,....7.--.-1:.- 2.-......,i...,,?.:.,ii,-,.,f.,:..:,....,....,,-....,z,,f.j1--i.r!.<.:0,...1„....,..F.,,,,,h„T;;;t,,,k,2,...„Iitq.%‘,14...,,.;;,e.ii,-,,,,z1.1. .. ,e,-.1,4,..r.,,,,,....1.,„...,.,.„,..,:,..„.,..,,,,,,..,;,..e,f:,,,,,,,,,.;!.,... .F'.`','' . •. ' .''.:'-' ,-t'S.1,:`,..,,,'il;...' •,. ..h'"...'•I',.:'-,'•;',....i...,-4".trj1.11.,,id!,i',.....-i,:::;4.,i"!..,,',I,,,••,,,,--;:',:,],r•.%cyr'1,,,5-4•-•.;-,4,,;:',.th,,,.,,,,,,,,,$-... .f.:,"/.1,2,.,,"St(z-,i':-PQ! i,..,Vr.,,,••,,,:,,,t,f,,,,i.„,•,,„ , ,,,,,-,.,,,,,, '' • ' ‘•-4-'1'''`'','''•''l'''' '.--'-'1 r•'''' •••''';‘•:1;••''-'•!':4'''Z'''-'t.,.0Pk1-.,r, ,,,;,14""'0, 7.1,11%.,t,,;:,.,,;-:.;,:i,,':f V)1",,','•,.,it$:1;',•:,q'1.-';''•:•,,tk',1.:,,_ti,','.1;If•••',",,,4,:• •.''•:;•'. ",,ii.:;' : , , ••'' •':'-i' i'''',:,'A.,;•'-‘ ' •'',. . •;;-'''',''',-..'i'.,•,.'1,1i,•',•:•`0 P-An•••`;',,q't4q,,'4,TN.g-sf:,,-:.6,1:'4.*:,,•',-;.'",f.";%.''..1"..%,1"4";.,'?!:'r•Ir.;,\'1,!:,:k•.;,,`,!:•`.0. ••••••1 rti.',Y-:"-',,'.•''' • .'•• '• • .4•:.-.i'..,',.':, • •.'.f•., .. ." .':, •',;•L.;;;;::`',';',,':,:,• '', " :,',:'i.,,,,,''.,',',4iMI.,•;;Iii.,•`•q•'”:4',•1•:..'-r,••-•;,-;1:',;!.,5;',,.1',:.:4-i,'•:•?,,,,,, ,i6:7.!•.'•,?',;,',?-,..",%.,Ii;',•;,'n '1.•43,4.ti!"-,;•1•1:42;C•;i,',,1:4:-.,i '!•14.['••'•,:.•i,C• .•,,.:, . .•'•'''... .• . ,:","1 ' •' • ' , ,.:•':.?,•••4-,T•..E.' - -• -, ••,,,A,,,;'-,-:',-,,,•',.‘...1„....,,,:?v1,-1.',,m,,•..;„,,,,,,,,,,..,,:...•,,-;Lz,,.•,..-,•-•,:i.,,,,,..1.rt;;;,,,,,,,or„1,:•;,:.,,,,,,,•,,,,,,I,,,,.„-....,.,,,,,;:;,,,..,,;,.„,-;,..,•••• ., . • . .,,, -, , •,, , ,• i-.7',",,,‘,.,;•:•g,2.;...c.:•,,,. •••''' `,'....•Ts:•,',.,:,,,;:-':,,:.-"i",-,:,n.!":,,,t',.:';•: •,,,l;';`.:4•••"4-',V••.;:4i-i-l•ci:Xii'i hi...,‘!.'1•-•:,;-'1,':;'-;'..;.,..,•j",•:',:.:''F'?'-',,.'`f•:i4,2, -;‘•,•''',‘,"l'''.Z:,i.,,'•':;'-• :• .- '''-'': C.',.1.: ' .•;!!,:.,, :,•.:••••:..:-.5i,,../.•;,,,.:',..,....::••••,:, . ,.„•,....,:,;',•••,,!--,,,,,,,ke,,,,., 71`,;-.-', ,`,-:.,1:-.',,p,;;:',•';)•..,•,:iii,,:'-..';•";;;,-',:,',124-1"4:.•;,5,!:,4,=',:.,-"...;:.,`;!:• :.-5',,,-'Ini••;.'-:.'';',':',... !,?.-,,...1, .,i...,....);.;'. ".. . ,. .. . . . ... . . ....V• • 't "'r:.-:, •:::'.',. ,,,..,4:,*.'d'' . ,f'•,::::' . . ,!::•.,,,..,,,,,, .::2,•...:•..,-1.:":"., • . ..,.q•;••••••' •.• ''".„7.','•*; '••''':,,',-‘' '!::'j:',.',' ;,?.;,:'. ' •••;•''.'",:',' *.:.: 2-,*,,,''..,r..: • ..0.,-,.V., . HENRY DAUBERT Applicant VCA.,,'.1 , ' ' , • , . . .:1? File No. R-009-81 . . - . . . A•fi•!' .. Project Name SAME N, .. • • Property Location Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue S. 0.••.%' , •,1,••• , ,., and S. 7th Street .. ,,.?..•:..• :,..,..,. • • HEARING EXAMINER: Date 3-10-81 e,'.. ...,.,..; ',..q..,., Recommendation Denial • kf::,:.:: . • ;Ai.. . Req./Rec. Date Received Date Response ..\.-. :fi... . Appeal - Date Received 1-4 i `i ig I ''Reversa6‘ 4i7r -0,i+ . Council App1seva-1 - Date .. . .. . Ordinance/-Rese+u-t-bam—# 35 Li 9 Date 6/.//g i 1 ? Mylar to County for Recording , 1 ,„. Mylar Recording # ;., ..•_ , •• . . Remarks: . \ . . • , Ir. i• • L... , - . • . , , . • .. . _ . . . . . ,. 't . • • . . . • , • . . .- . ' . . , .... ,,,, : • . . • . . . . • , • • - ' • • • • . . • • • • •• . • I/. , . INTER-OFFICE MMEMORANDUMANDUM � JJ-0-- • \\ ,...,---- TO : Planning Dept. �;; r '-r'' DATE : 5/8/81 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE : Ordinances M2 =7=-64+ r 8A Rezone Ordinance Daubert R 009-81 We attach =EFti.= 'snq"Y=Us- Ordinance (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee . db - �ti OF - Rz .. ,. u.�. o THE CITY OF RENTON CJ ®® w ' 'z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 yV . BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235- 2550 '1 D SEP-0'. yy f Y 11, May 11, 1981 • • TO : Del Mead, City Clerk • FROM: Planning Department RE : HENRY DAUBERT REZONE, R-009-81 • • • The proposed ordinance relating to the subject rezone has ' been reviewed' and found accurate . The legal description is being verified by the Engineering Division and will be 'forthcoming. A map of the site is attached for inclusion with the ordinance . wr • Attachment Ar "' OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON z, s4r POST OFFICE 90X 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON• WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 to CORI LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY A0'9gTe0 tE4��P May 7 ]981• SUSAN R. IRWIN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY SEP TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Re: Rezone Ordinance - Daubert R-009-81 Dear Del : Enclosed please find the original of a proposed Rezone Ordinance as above captioned. Lawrence J, Warren LJW:nd - Encl. cc: Ways and Means Committee • Mayor Council. President Planning Dept, tt r f CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL , CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO BUSINESS DI SRICT (B 1 ) . (R-00J-81 DAUBERT) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General. Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classifiention District (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or I about January 16, 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and . public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about February 24 , 1981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request having been denied and the matter having been appealed to the City Council of the City of Renton and said City Council having reversed the Hearing Examiner ' s Decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REN' JN , WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: . SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1 ) as hereinbelow specified subject to widening of South 7th Street to include curbs , gutters , sidewalks and street asphalt ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set .forth herein . (Said property being located at Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street . ) SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its -passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of May, 1981 . Delores A. Mead , City Clerk • APPROVED BY. THE MAYOR this day of May, 1981 . Barbara Y. Shinpoch , Mayor (/ l/ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 4, 1981 APPEAL FILED B' ' .° O RT - REZONE R-00941 (`#Ceferred 4/13/81) The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the above-mentioned matter, and finding that the Hearing Examiner is in error in that the subject property is on the south edge of an established residen- tial area and the rear yard provides a proper use separation between adjacent residential uses and Light Industrial uses across South 7th Street, and that the development of the Light Industry property on the south side of South 7th Street will result in the reconstruction of South 7th Street , making the street a focal point of development , and further finding that the Hearing Examiner is in error in the finding and conclusion that the rezoning of the subject property will create a non-conforming use, the Committee recommends that the City Council reverse the Hearing Examiner and grant the requested reclassification to B-1 subject to the widening of South 7th Street to include curbs, gutters , side- walks and street asphalt. t...,--1..." ',A 6,1_6(7,47- andy ckh111 , Chairman `N- Earl Clymer �y�, \ ,-.G REiV2 /0 TD ,� -_ 0 John Reed ON1 �A r. .r ,,.r''� c Renton City Council 6/1/81 Page 3 Old Business - Continued Fence Height Council President Stredicke reported receipt of Board of Adjust- ment report, noting one of items having most Board action during the year was requests for variance relative to fence height. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, MATTER OF VARIANCES FOR FENCE HEIGHT BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee report recommended concurrence with the Committee Public Works Department and acceptance of the low bid of M. A. 1981 Asphalt Segale, Inc. , low bid in amount of $83,280 for the 1981 Asphalt Resurfacing Resurfacing. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE Contract Award REPORT AND AWARD CONTRACT. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee report noted review of 5/11/81 referral Committee of matter of Hearing Examiner review of.Administrative appeals. Chairman: Clymer The report recommended no action be taken, recalling recent review of ordinance by the Planning and Development Committee. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, COUNCIL CONCUR IN WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE REPORT RE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3549. The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final readings Daubert Rezone and adoption of an ordinance rezoning property from General classi- fication G to Business District B-1 located at the northwest corner of Shattuck Ave. S and S 7th St. ; known as the Henry Daubert Rezone R-009-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: 5-AYES: STREDICKE, REED, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL; ONE -NO: SHANE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3550 The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading and suspension Interim of the rules advancing ordinance to second and final readings. Financing Ordinance was read providing for interim financing of construction LID #321 of LID #321 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Ordinance was read providing for installation of sanitary sewer mains and laterals in the vicining of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE, LID #321 ; financing by Peoples National Bank at 12%. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. The committee recommended first reading for the following ordinances: First Readings An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from Woodcock Rezone Residence District R-2 to R-3 located at 123 Pelly Ave. N; known as the Woodcock Rezone R-015-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Parking for the An ordinance was read providing Police Department enforcement Handicapped of certain parking restricted to handicapped persons with decal or special license permit. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Cascadia An ordinance was read providing for annexation of certain area to Annexation the City known as the Cascadia Annexation. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. Councilman Clymer noted letter received from North Ward, 1115 108th Ave. NE. Bellevue, requesting more time before adoption of ordinance to determine sewer availability. CARRIED. Resolution #2402 The committee recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Improvements declaring intent to construct and install curbs, gutters, sidewalks S 37th St. and storm drainage, street lighting, paving, sanitary sewer, watermain Talbot Rd. and improvements in Talbot Rd. and South 37th St. for LID 324, LID #324 setting Public Hearing 6/22/81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Council President Stredicke reported favorable response to neighbor- hood pickup of cuttings, etc. (HUD Program) . Stredicke called attention to July 4th ball game between Council and Senior Citizens at Liberty Park, OF R� v ID O THE CITY OF RENTON U t% INUI CI1�L L UIL®IR1G MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 "� BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD n 0,0 �o CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2501 o9.TFd SEP� ,jk June 3, 1981 Mr. Henry Daubert 645 Shattuck Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: City of Renton - Rezone 009-81 Dear Mr. Daubert: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of June 1, 1981, has adopted Ordinance No. 3549 to rezone your property from General Classification District (G) to Business District (B-1) . A copy of the above-referenced Ordinance is enclosed. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON `72-r Delores A. Mead, CMC City Clerk DAM:db ENC: 1 S`. r t CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3549 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G ) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1 ) . (R-009-81 DAUBERT) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the ) City of Renton" , as amended , and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith , the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about January 16, 1981 , which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation , study and public hearing , and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about February 24 , 1981 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request having been denied and the matter having been appealed to the City Council of the City of Renton and said City Council having reversed the Hearing Examiner ' s Decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City ' s Comprehensive Plan , as amended , and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto , and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1 ) as hereinbelow specified subject to widening of South 7th Street to include curbs , gutters , sidewalks and street asphalt ; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended , to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . (Said property being located at Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street . ) SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage , approval and five days after its publication . PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 1st day of J:tinp, .:1J81. De ores H r NMead ��i�$r Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 1st day of :June, .198.1 . D Barbara Y. ninpoch ,�Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warr , -City Attorney Date of Publication: June 5, 1981 f ,4 THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 16 IN SECTION 18 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH , RANGE 5 EAST , W . M . , IN THE CITY OF RENTON , KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH 7TH STREET ( FORMERLY SOUTH 144TH STREET ) WITH THE WEST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH AS PLATTED IN SMITHER ' S FIFTH ADDITION AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS , PAGE 33 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY , WASHINGTON ; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 120 FEET ; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SHATTUCH AVENUE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET ; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH 7TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 120 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET. TO THE POINT OF BEG I NF T'NG . .-03111113 / .. .r_, --. �' �'.t 1 \H ti y:�k__. 4 • F*, i ,• '"." ,.,•,;_ >aal iut .Ir.;r r�''Wr r r.; t 40 • .]9� `� 1 Q ,\ i / ;i1 1•4 r'T 1 R_._T.1 :3 Ji_�7,/ 1, `�• :a � • I.i .1.yT ' (�'Jl� Q` ' r ra 41k t, w• ,` •Y 1 \ \ 1 .., 0, c i 4..,,, , ---.-.-,- -41-..-, , il 4'. : .---/e \ r . s _�. 0 �rS 4 -, .W_yN T , AC • Q' ` '•• , .r «y li} W r�Zi :-. 79, •,i • ”,, I \. r T :'� W '111 •� .,�! 1 4 11 r�,f, lLr •rj i . Are)'' 42 -.4 . .?.,:, !..,;, ,T: al 0 is 'g."... .._ .....1 •1 ' I.••-•," •. . 1 :1•! 1).; ,'' - :::.1141i 1.S\ \ , , Rr„. 3 :' : .>3,: : .. , is----...1 ,i r peKWWW " , 2 S HOOL SC'NO� G ;` C rl I / , ir irz-11,---._ % .'10 ' ' : 2°". :.:4 mi -.' ,:::... i,,F.- -,--.. i;.-.. ,1 ."..-. , „...,,,,,,__, ... ..-....,;:._ . .., .: ... ._ • ....„._.,. _,.: 0.. • • , ,..„..... „........ __ ., 10.1 0- • • RA ;.7 .-' ':" ' --t . - ... .. ,L3,2''PALLILL'1111.11:.11;1i3.,3C1._I <-4-•, tr.4--'-', G.-.'. : C.-- ''''i . 4 ' J....iir n, orrr:, N. I.'. Sr.. Y'/ • 1� r Rl�� ... L !.\\ , ,.1�•'I,.rl r. p 3 .I W F -rid .,r 4 t; i; ,'. : "!' :If-' 1' F dr. C i F 7' n , ri 6L-ft.j 21F 14., : t� r '1 ' r4 r Z 3 $ p- cj W 31 P Y r7T ZP:: ....--\ 4-:. f _ S 1 7C 1 Fr1 7 ti :S. RI 1 r 6 • --33-1—\\ .. 7,.1;.,,.,.-,.....1 :.,/,...., ...t,.. .... . ,.: i-c„..r, ii i. ,,. 1 '' ' VP. a., i -,,- r I, ' ;rs,,,,,,, ,. „ ..,..„, ,,,,t, ,_h t, ,, , , , I-, -- •. ,,,‘ \ , ....... ,......,".• . i.1i it 10-14. tk, 41t1,,,_,,,, . ;,t, 14.1: ....; , , , i -.., ...,.. I., i,r4-4.-• ••., ,. '1 '', ,... '' "--/. ' g. \ .'. 1 I f c•+, I� II , ` f� , !j rh. t • j kip V »+. J ,r' •' , C f • j" lil_ r' : A �.,_1U I f ' B— 5u�a�ECT SAT R. 1 ,' ' J ro Mi,I . /1 - /... .I : r .4i."4"11 - L. ,4 ,'"://1 : ' 5 L 7; '' ' - 5._.141 -ff .t . _ f /// ® ram ® r .I. '- ' k , • HENRY DAUBERT t R-009-81 I • 4 APPLICANT HENRY DAUBERT TOTAL AREA ±4, 800 sq. ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Shattuck Avenue South • EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District EXISTING USE Single Family Residential PROPOSED USE Remodeled Office r COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial . ' COMMENTS • • 1 b• x h v r Renton City Council 5/4/81 Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued Appeal Attorney representing James E. Banker requested Council consider • Special Permit the matter of appeal of Special Permit 111-80. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SP 111-80 SECOND REED, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOP- James E. Banker MENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Development Com- 405 S 7th St. mittee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report concerning appeal filed by James E. Banker of Land Use Hearing Examiner Kaufman' s recommendation for denial 3/26/81 . Banker had sought special per- mit for 65 ft. (five story) building to be used as office/condominium complex which would exceed 35 ft. height permitted in the L-1 zone. The committee report found the Hearing Examiner in error in his finding and conclusion that the proposed use is incompatible with surrounding light industrial uses since the requested use is an allowed use in the L-1 zone, and further finding the application serves the general welfare and public interest. The report recom- mended Council reverse the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and grant the Special Permit subject to conditions submitted to Examiner by Planning Department and subject to installation of perimeter landscaping 15 ft. wide on the perimeter of the property except on the west side and removal of the existing auto repair use from the site prior to issuance of occupancy permit for proposed five story building. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Appeal MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, SUSPEND ORDER OF BUSINESS AND Henry Daubert CONSIDER THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT RE HENRY Rezone R-009-81 DAUBERT APPEAL. CARRIED. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report re appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman's recommendation of 3/10/81 for denial of request for rezone from G to B-1 for use as office; area located northwest corner of Shattuck Ave S and S 7th St. The Planning and Development Committee report found the Hearing Examiner in error in that the subject property is on the south edge of an established residential area and rear yard provides a proper use separation between adjacent residential uses and Light Industrial uses across S 7th St. and that the development of the L-1 property on the south side of S 7th St. will result in the reconstruction of S 7th St. , making the street a focal point of development; and further finding that the Hearing Examiner is in error in that the finding and conclusion that the rezoning of the subject property will create a non-conforming use; the committee recommended that Council reverse the Examiner and grant requested reclassification to B-1 subject to widening of S 7th St. to in- clude curbs, gutters , sidewalks and street asphalt. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT. CARRIED. Parking on Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Ave. S, requested Council to reverse the Mill Ave. S decision of the Board of Public Works and allow him to improve the staircase between upper and lower Mill Ave. between N 4th and 6th St. Webb explained Board decision that no action be taken until such time as parking problems can be reviewed and solution found. Webb submitted photographs showing parking on both levels of Mill Ave. S. Discussion ensued, upon Council request Lt. Persson advised that parking on sidewalk is illegal . City Attorney Warren called attention to 14 day appeal period of Board of Public Works decision to the Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, REFER THE MATTER TO THE TRANSPORTATION COM- MITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Vers e Vaupel , 400 Cedar Ave. S. , inquired whether or not the Board had advised Mr. Webb of his appeal rights and asked that citizens be so advised. Systems Kathy Keolker, 532 Cedar Ave. S, Chairperson of Citizens Advisory Development Committee, asked Council consider the community facilities charge Fees ordinance at this time. MOVED BY REED, SECOND HUGHES, SUSPEND RULES AND BRING THE MATTER OF SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE ORDINANCE ON THE FLOOR. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Clymer presented committee report recommending reading and adoption of a resolution establishing facts supporting the Community Facilities Charge. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, ADVANCE RESOLUTION FOR READING. CARRIED. 1 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting May 4 , 1981 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro tem Richard M. Stredicke led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT COUNCIL HUGHES, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM, JOHN REED. COUNCILMAN CHARLES SHANE arrived at 8:08 p.m. CITY OFFICIALS LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative IN ATTENDANCE Assistant; DELORES A MEAD, City Clerk; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Acting Public Works Director; Lt. DON PERSSON, Police Department. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 27, 1981 AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, L. I .D. #323 published and mailed according to law, Mayor Pro tem Stredicke SW 43rd St. opened the Public Hearing to consider the preliminary assessment Improvements roll in the amount of $518,039 for Local Improvement District Preliminary No. 323 for the reconstruction and widening of SW 43rd Street Assessment (S 180th St. ) from East Valley Highway to West Valley Highway including installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, street lights, sanitary sewers, bike path, improved railroad crossing, paving, etc. Letter from Acting Public Works Director Houghton reported as of 5:00 PM this date no protests have been received and recommended Council concurrence with the L. I .D. and referral to the Ways and Means Committee for an ordinance ordering construction. Continued Acting Public Works Director Houghton displayed wall map and explained project, noting joint project with City of Kent, that Kent also holding hearing this evening for L. I .D. in southerly portion of SW 43rd Street; partial Urban Arterial Board funding in the amount of $3,000,000; total project in the amount of $5,000,000. Houghton explained widening of SW 43rd to five lanes , narrowing to four at railroad crossing. Persons present making inquiries : David Campbell , 4037 SE llth, speaking on behalf of Cecelia Campbell , 1508 SW 43rd, noted sewers previously installed and assessed, inquiring of roadway width at property. Houghton noted no assessment for Mrs. Campbell for sewers; that roadway would be widened to five lanes at the Campbell property. Gary Goodwin, 1830 SW 43rd, Mt. McKinley Fence Co. , adjacent to the railroad track, inquired re the 24" difference in elevation between centerline and his property. Houghton advised the elevation is determined by the railroad tracks and that every effort would be made to assure roadway compatability. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INCLUDING REFERRAL TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Don Schlemeier, 14220 145th SE, represented the Highlands Community Church and recalled 4/27/81 public hearing for the vacation of a Street Vacation portion of Jefferson Ave. NE, wherein Council granted the vacation Jefferson Ave NE including reversionary clause that property revert to the City if VAC-1-81 not used as a parking lot for church purposes. Mr. Schlemeier explained long range plans for construction of new sanctuary which would cover a portion of the vacated right-of-way and requested the reversionary clause state for charitable or religious purposes. Schlemeier also noted plans for new sanctuary would necessitate relocation of utilities from vacated street and the church would bear all of the costs. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROPOSAL AND REWRITE THE ORDINANCE AS REQUESTED. CARRIED. City Attorney Warren noted ordinance change to remove the words "for a parking lot" leaving "for church purposes" `(concern- ing the reversionary clause) . (See later ordinance on first reading) PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT May 4, 1981 APPEAL FILED BY HENRY DAUBERT - REZONE R-009-81 (Referred 4/13/81) The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the above-mentioned matter, and finding that the Hearing Examiner is in error in that the subject property is on the south edge of an established residen- tial area and the rear yard provides a proper use separation between adjacent residential uses and Light Industrial uses across South 7th Street, and that the development of the Light Industry property on the south side of South 7th Street will result in the reconstruction of South 7th Street , making the street a focal point of development, and further finding that the Hearing Examiner is in error in the finding and conclusion that the rezoning of the subject property will create a non-conforming use, the Committee recommends that the City Council reverse the Hearing Examiner and grant the requested reclassification to B-1 subject to the widening of South 7th Street to include curbs, gutters , side- walks and street asphalt. 6 GLc � andy ckhill , Chairman • Earl Clymer A John Reed A/6/11:7c( ) / i � #21/99/ Planning 12 1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : RRZO/rE" R4. Q641040 lAys•sal t!?OMeSi' ertrosi " „4.Q„1l polfitity use .es (" result/4W.W o 4441ure Location : NIficerter ef adiue ' Are.S. * S. 7LS71. Appl i cant.: bau1. r't, Hen? TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Pkrie Police Department A, R, C, MEETING DATE : l/��/�// If•( Public Works Department G r r << I� Engineering Division affic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT FFO fliE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF Y UR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASED ROV DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date V Renton City Council 4/13/81 Page 2 Consent Agenda - Continued • Bid Opening RR Xing Report of City Clerk Mead listed four bids received at 4/8/81 bid opening for Railroad Grade Crossing Markers. (See attached tabulation) Refer to Transportation Committee for recommendation. Travel Letter from Acting Planning Director Clemens requested approval for attendance at American Planning Association National Conference in Boston Mass . 4/25-29/81 . Funds are budgeted. Council concur. Secretaries Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared 4/19-25/81 as Secretaries Week Week to acknowledge talents and contributions to business and government ; 4/22/81 declared as Secretaries Day. Council concur. Jessie Clulow Letter from the Public Works Department requested authorization for Deed the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a quit claim deed from the City to Mrs. Clulow to clear property title and save costly research of records in Olympia. The letter explained in 1930 the City sued to foreclose on Mrs. Clulow' s property for failure to pay an assess- ment of $8.06. Mrs . Clulow has owned and occupieds the property since 1921 and has paid all real estate taxes . Council concur. Damages Claims Claim for Damages was filed by Richard F. Martin, 14805 167th Pl . Martin SE, in amount of 5505.83; hit open manhole cover causing damage to his vehicle. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Smith Claim for Damages was filed by Lawrence D. and Sally C. Smith 12535 SE 203rd P1 , Kent for the Estate of Timothy Allen Smith in the amount of $500,000; expenses and loss of life. Improper traffic signal and lane configuration were alleged. Refer to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Halsen Rezone Land Use Hearing Examiner Kaufman recommended approval of rezone from GS-1 to SR-1 for property located at 1718 Talbot Rd. South; known as the Bobby A. Halsen rezone R-011 -81 . Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Appeal An appeal has been filed by Henry Daubert , 645 Shattuck Ave. S. , Henry Daubert regarding Land Use Hearing Examiner 's recommendation for denial Rezone R-009-81 of Rezone R-009-81 from G to B-1 . Property located on the north- west corner of S 7th St. and Shattuck Ave. S. Refer to the Planning and Development Committee for recommendation. Appeal An appeal has been filed by James E. Banker, 405 S 7th St. , regard- James Banker ing Land Use Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation for denial of Special Permit Special Permit SP 111-80 to allow five story office/condo building SP-111-80 at 405 S 7th St . Refer to Planning and Development Committee. Known as the James E. Banker Special Permit. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approval PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Committee of the Whole report was presented by Council President Committee of Stredicke which recommended concurrence in the 1981 supplemental the Whole budget as submitted at the meeting of 4/9/81 . The proposed budget 1981 Supplemental was attached showing Revenue from additional property tax and from Budget the 1981 unallocated contingency fund : total amount $383 ,574; plus Unanticipated Federal Revenue Sharing Funds in amount of $214,897. The report listed proposed allocations including expenses not anticipated for 1981, items which have become necessities since 1/1/81 and newly considered items ; also items considered valid for 1981 budget but previously denied for lack of funds. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Aviation Aviation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented committee report Committee recommended that the old Vocational School building be rented as Aero-Dyne Corp. of 5/1/81 for $150 per month for interim period until the leases Building Rental are renegotiated effective 9/1/81 . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN AVIATION REPORT. CARRIED. 1 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 13 , 1981 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD M. STREDICKE, Council President; JOHN REED, CHARLES F. COUNCIL SHANE, THOMAS W. TRIMM, ROBERT HUGHES, RANDALL ROCKHILL. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN EARL CLYMER. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; W. E. Bennett , Acting Finance Director; DON PERSSON, Police Rep. ; DAVID CLEMENS, Acting Planning Director; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Acting Public Works Director. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES , ADOPT THE MINUTES OF APRIL 6, 1981 . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, AMEND MOTION TO CORRECT MINUTES PAGE 6, PARAGRAPH 4, REMOVE NAME AND ADD "HUGHES." CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, L. I .D. #315 published and mailed as required by law, Mayor Shinpoch opened Final Assessment the public hearing to consider the final assessment roll in the Sidewalks amount of $16,318.04, sidewalks on the east side of Burnett Ave. S Burnett Ave. S from S 2nd St. to S Tobin St. Letter from Acting Public Works Director Houghton advised as of 5:00 p.m. no protests were received and recommended referral to the Ways and Means Committee for an ordinance confirming the assessment roll . Public Works Director Houghton displayed a wall map explained the project and noted City crew would accomplish clean up. There being no audience comment, it was MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUHES, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, REFER MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR PROPER ORDINANCE CONFIRMING THE ROLL. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Cheryl Tobac, CH2M Hill Engineering, Bellevue, asked the ordinance approving rezone R-004-81 Vehicle Test Technology be presented for Vehicle Test first and final readings and adopted in order to secure building Technology, Inc. permit and commence construction. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND REED, Rezone R-004-81 THE ITEM BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. Ways Ordinance and Means Committee Acting Chairman Hughes presented rezone ordi- nance for first reading. The ordinance was read by City Clerk Mead; property located at the SE corner of intersection of Thomas SW and SW 10th Street; rezone from G to L-1 . MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. Councilman Hughes explained the restrictive covenants have been filed; however, further explained his request for more information concerning Department of Ecology and emission testing at location. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: TRIMM, HUGHES, ROCKHILL; 3-NO: STREDICKE, REED, SHANE; MAYOR SHINPOCH VOTED AYE AND MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Appointment Letter from Mayor Shinpoch appointed Larry Weiss to the position of Promotion in Lieutenant in the Fire Department effective 4/16/81 , subject to Rank customary six-month probationary period. Council concur. Union Square Letter from Gary Moritz, Union Square Business Park, 326 Union Ave. Business Park NE, requested a latecomers agreement for a required water supply Requests line to serve the Union Square Business Park facilities' fire Latecomer protection system; installation cost $8,052.95. Refer to the Agreement Utilities Committee. Dom)' 6% _ -. OF R4,1, o THE CITY OF RENTON `b © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n *A BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 09 co• CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 09gT fD SEP100 April 8, 1981 APPEAL FILED BY HENRY DAUBERT RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner' s Decision Dated March 10, 1981 , Henry Daubert Rezone R-009-81 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner' s decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $25.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee and council meetings, should you desire to attend. Yours very truly , CITY OF RENTON ,�. �.0 n-F�wi CI. /'2 Delores A. Mead , C .M. C. City Clerk DAM/st rof RE,>' RECD,1ED 02 APR 9 1S71 N�NG DEPPe April 7, 1981 • Renton City Council _ . City of Renton Municipal Building Renton, Washington Re: R009-81 We request the City Council review the findings and conclusions of the hearing examiner in his denial of the rezone requestfrom General to B-1 on property located at 645 Shattuck Avenue South. The planning department recom- mended approval of the application. The hearing examiner recommended denial. We agree with the Planning Departments interpretation of land use policies and comprehensive plan and believe the hearing e:aminer made substantial errors in fact which we will enumerate. On page2, item 9, of the March 10, 1981 report under Findings, the hearing examiner observes; " A power line corridor is just west of the site separating the subject property from develment along Rainier Avenue South." The west boundary of the subject site is a wrecking storage yard used by Gene Meyer towing. The power line corridor has been partially vacated leaving a buildable strip of property on the subject site's west boundary. The owner of this property is advertising to build to suit. He is looking for a retail tenant. Hense the property is not separated from the develop- ment along Rainier Avenue South. We think this is a most impor- tant fact the hearing examiner was not aware of. We think the hearing examiner might not have come to the same conclusions had he known a business will soon abut the subject properties west boundary. The remainder of our observations of errors are contained also in the March 10, report under the title Conclusions. Conclusion 1. The hearing examiner states the proponent must demonstrate the request. . .is in compliance with at least one of the three criteria which provide. . . a) The subject site has not been considered in a previous area wide rezone or land use analysis . b) The subject site is potentially designed for the new classification per the comprehensive plan. c) There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezone of the property or area. -1- 1 I The subject property meets not one, but all three of these criteria. Yet the hearing examiner concludes this is not a good use of land use planning. Rather the conclusion reads, the proponent has failed to show the property meets these criteria. ' ow it ar When the hearing was conducted we of thed not area.knln ourwresearchs fy development to chronolize the 194 the history we find the property t disclo es but sometimalbetween 1953the planning department rep° and 1960 the property was annexed into the city of Renton. It was county when the zoning code was adopted in 1953, and was not a part of the area rezone at that time. Nplan area rezone designed th has occured since then. The comprehensive p as commercial when it was adopted in 1965. Some of the material changes in the circumstances since the comprehensive plan adopted are; KMart was built in 19Baskins Rainier and RobbinsBank eStrip to Burger King was built in 1968-69;Center was built in 1970. Trebors was enlarged this year. across Rainier Mortgage locatedol in RentuckyuFriedgChicken aebestm eanys is about two years ' one can remember is abo BiXeaears old. old.SaThesParkSandeRiderlot of subject site) is abouty of Rodopened_ ins the laGrady Way increasedee months . The theetrafficncountafrom 3166 Road across Grady dayin 1980. cars per day in 1978 to 4073 cars per We believe the comprehensive planbsuggested use of the property as business is a good example of land use planning. Conclusion 2. The hearing examiner discusses blighting influence of business on residential. eSrreet.are lbSixroftthoseoarehmultik between South 7th and South 6th rem plexes. Fran Swartzenberger who owns fourofrtzeng tainingesingle family homes lives in one and is planning on houses at 610, 612 and 614 Shattuck and building a 12-14 plea, she hopes this summer. Glover who owns a home at 636 Shattuck, directly east of subject property is planning on selling to an apartment developer. Two of the remaining homes are owned by out of area investors. This homeslhaveaallrsignedhe owners of the single family owner a statement which I have included sayingg theyy have no ctionto to the change of use of Mr. Dauber ts from business. We intend for the changed use of the property to be aninfluence. It will upgrade improvement for the area not a blighting the property values rather than hurt them. • South 7th is a man made divider separating light Conclusion 3. ial per plan. Shattuck fromer bmprehensive plan ness and distthe man made rdividereseparating Shattuck per comprehensive business from residential. If a man made divider is superior for buffering incompatible zones than setback requirements, it is only logical the hearing examiners observation complements this request rather than be an argument for denial. I think the hearing examiner here was not aware the power line had been partially vacated. Conclusion 4. The issue here is protection of the single family home to the north. This property is owned by an investor who has also signed a statement he has no objection to the rezone to busi- ness which is included. In actuality it is this property which is a blight because of the accumulated maintenance I am told is typical of transition areas . Look at this house and see for yourself who needs protection from whom. Conclusion 5. The hearing examiner claims Burnett Park which is a quarter mile from the subject site is strengthening its residential character. I think an increased traffic count of 257. within earshot is a better indication of the character of the neighborhood. I think the Park and Ride lot sixty feet from the subject properties south boundary is a better indication of the character of the neighborhood. I think a build to suite sign on the subject properties immediate boundary is a better indication of the character of the neighborhood. I don't think the hearing examiner realizes the Burnett Park is 1400 feet from the subject property. Conclusion 6. The examiner states; "The current residence is located within six feet of a residential property to the north while the B-1 zone requires a minimum of ten feet in this location, Section 4 711-D. This section reads: No yards are required except for lots whose side yard is adjacent to a residential district where said yard regula- tions shall then be the same as in the residential district: front yards shall conform to adjacent residences; side yards to be not less than five feet. The hearing examiner erred in his observation that ten feet is required for this set back. The side yard in this location is conforming. The examiner further says the current R-4 zoning of the subject site provides a reasonable classification of the subject site and permits reasonable uses . This application is for a rezone from General to Business . Conclusion 7. The planning department recommended approval for the application.because the 4800 square foot lot was too small to be obtrusive. The hearing examiner recommended denial of the applica- tion because the 4800 square foot lot is too intense a use of the subject site. -3- • The applicant is little confused. The application is consistent with the comprehensive land use plan and the planning department recommended approval. We were surprised to receive a denial by the hearing examiner. This corner location will minimize the parking requirements and accessability of the applicant. The sites visibility was enhanced by the Talbot 3xtention and even more so with the opening of the Park And Ride Lot. The area is in transition and it may seem slow to the hearing examiner, none the less explainable when you take into account the economic problems of Renton in the early 1970's . The applicant can not afford to collect ownership of the adjoining properties and rezone the entire block to business at this time. He feels he should not be discriminated against because he is a small property owner. There is a need for property ownership of small business sites rather than leasing from the major landlords . The area is in transition a fact agreed upon by both the planning department and the hearing examiner. The applicant believes his application should not be held up because he is only requesting a rezone of the corner lot. It is the logical location for the transition to begin. Thank you for your consideration. in arbitrating the opposing recommendations of the planning department and the hearing examiner. We think the problem with our not being granted approval by the hearing examiner is the fact he is not familiar with the with the total growth picture of the area,which we have hopefully reminded you of in the foregoiug pages . Henry Daubert 645 Shattuck Avenue South Renton, Washington Attachments : • A- Map of area and signatures of property owners east of site B- Signatures of property owners north of site C- Signature of property owner west of site D- ' Title report stating partial vacation of power line easement • -4- 1 \ ST►tN ; j . \ S NGPP1 I�; - �y .r-\ c4NM12 1 k 1\ k k P�P�S Nt \J LLA � Vj imiimisisminsmi S 6TN sr W )Schwartzenberger ,.DUr PLC CHILlct►`1 _ , � SI Y VtfX 11 \ Schwartz nberglr_' 2 SH( bos FUTURe I _ E IC T 11/ Fr. chwartzenberger pLEX _�X \ Schwartzenberger FL 5 Q \ , I I4PLE IOnstott J o. f I REC�CIN Nelson I[ Hutchinson. - YARD I MacLurg , , ,,, I jpiolf _ su�o1N L Glover I I S 774 . ST — - /----• I r BA1\ KERS "PENTOIN / REN ToN VA"RK AND ZI�F W2Ec IN . SssF,cv.AA CoqcritE XA RD AIL-1-D , �1 I •\.. i Gc4-% We the following owners of property on Shattuck east of Henry Dauberts property at 645 Shattuck do not have any objection to a rezone of 645 Shattuck to Business. st : Mel Glover 636 Shattuck Lots 10& 11 (7y7 _ se Trov Hutchinson 632 Shattuck Lot 9 L -yer-Y . 46 James Gorden 628 Shattuck Lot 8 V L CY� t, 2_�use on Onstott 626 Shattuck Lot 7 � � -�_ � tal Vitali Chonin 61b Shattuck Lot 6 tal FrsaSwartzenberger6L4 Shatiuck_Lo4Il l A140.1/11Artj :al Fran`$wartzenherger 6124 Shattuck Lot 4 I, :al Fraq. chJaj aberaer 6111 ShattgJc tot 3 These two iroperty owners own• the two lots north of subject property, Nelsons is the eightplex and MacLurg is the single family home directly north. To whom it may concern: I own the property north of Daubert,the 33 foot lot. I • have no objection to the Daubert rezone to business. I am aware his south setback does not meet requirements and the requirements are there to protect the livibility of my property. A rezone of Dauberts property will not ...Ix :y opinion adversely affect my property in any way. • Thank you, �. )here • J—.2/8/ MacL 3klA ti j 4 ci,,✓ V4 C • To whom it may concern: I own the property north of MacLurg on the West side of Shattuck. It is an eightplex. I have no objection to a rezone of the Daubert property to business zoning. I have no objection to the Daubert property not meeting the setback on its south side facing South Seventh. I see no reason why the use of the Daubert property as a small business site will adversely affect my property. 411%4-114 4f/% 45:4‘.,f ,.., ATTACHMENT C "Wore" • To Wham it May Concern: I own the property east of Henry Dauberts propertyin Renton. I have received a vacation of a portion of the power line easement which leaves me enough buildable property to erect a building. I am advertising for a tenant with a build to suit sign. I have no objection to a rezone of the Daubert property to buinessiance because and have nof foot shortage of set back yard ofonerequirements. of a and one half . • ATTACHMENT ,. Title report on Daubert property Order No . 51 - October 28, 1980 DESCRIPTION: That portion of Government Lot 16 in Section 18 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows : $ Beginning at the intersection of the North line of South 144th Street (being the North line of 7th Avenue in the City of Renton produced West) with the West line of Shattuck Street in said City of Renton as platted in Sinither's 5th Addition, as per plat recorded in Volume 16 of Plats on page 33, records of King County; thence West along said North line 120 feet; thence North parallel with said West line of Shattuck Street , 40 feet ; thence .East parallel with said North line of South 144th Street, 120 fee to said West:line of Shattuck Street; thence South along said West line 40 feet to point of beginning; c • • ' 1 Page 2 Order No . 510028 EXCEPTIONS: A. 1% Excise tax, if unpaid. - B. General taxes, as follows, together-with interest after delinquency : Tax Acc.e. No. o Year - ilinount Billed Amount Paid '• 182305- .Wc O: :1980 $194. 90 $194 . 90 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: -` Grantee: - United States of America Purpose: Electric power transmission lines ''. Area Affected: Within a:_strip of land 250 feet in width , .boundaries of said strip lying 62 . 50 feet distant Southwesterly -from and 187 .50 feet . distant-Northeasterly from and parallel to the -survey line of the Covington-Seattle • transmission line as now located and staked on the ground 2. Recording No. : _ . 3207080 (Affects Westerly portion of property herein -described) • .$aid.•easement was-:part ijlly.,released as.4p a pQLtion of. property,herein 1 .s$tibed by 'ins trumeft.recor ld-=u ecoidi-neNo."--790209 0718.E 2. • EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: - Oi. k€, • THE CITY OF RENTON c) v� r > ' z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n era rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR O DELORES A. MEAD 0 �• CITY CLERK O9itED SEPt��O�P 235-2500 May 6, 1981 Henry Daubert 645 Shattuck Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner' s Decision of March 10, 1981 Rezone R-009-81 Dear Mr, Daubert: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of May 4, 1981 considered your appeal and concurred in the Planning and Development Committee report to reverse the Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision and grant the requested reclassification from G to B-1 ; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Avc:. S. and S. 7th Street. A copy of the City Council Minutes of May 4, is attached for your information. Upon adoption of the confirming ordinance for the rezone, a copy will be forwarded to you. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office or the Planning Department 235-2550. Yours very truly, NTO� CITY OF RENTON c\% _1k)A„ OatiOUti IC) 11iy�l , 11 Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DM/m `ANNI NG OFe Enclosure cc: Tanning Dept. Hearing Exam. Plan/Development Committee Chrm. Council Pres. INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date 5-1 1-81 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM:ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF HENRY DAUBERT RE-ZONE NO. R-009-81 ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND THE REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION . FOR THE HENRY DAUBERT REaZONE No. R-009-81 ABDOUL GAFOUR ENGINEERING DEPT. ,.: --..,.." ' .. ' ."' ?IP"- • . • . . • , . etz------- ---:--- _ _ _ . _____. . _ ____ ___ , THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 16 IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP. 23 NORTH , . RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN THE CITY . OF RENTON , ' KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING . AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF • -- - SOUTH 7TH STREET ( FORMERLY SOUTH 144TH STREET ) WITH THE WEST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF SHATTUCK AVENUE ..SOUTH . AS PLATTED IN SMITHER'S FIFTH ADDITION AS PER PLAT RECORDED--IN :VOLUME 16 OF PLATS , PAGE 33 , •RECORDS - OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A .DISTANCE OF 1220 FEET; -THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST -_ -_ --- RIGHT-OF-WAY=- LINE-OF---SHATTUCH--AVENUE=- SOUTH-A--DISTANCE OF- 40 -FEET ;-- - THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH 7TH STREET A DISTANCE OF 120 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH ; THENCE SOUTH ALONG_. SAIDHWEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINMWNG'. . • OF R4ti ,y - , ,; o THE CITY OF RENTON u .10 �• MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 � BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR a DELORES A. MEAD 0�o co. CITY CLERK 0,9gT60 SEP1E4''?" May 6, 1981 Mary Pat Ryan 15 South Grady Way, Suite 134 Renton, WA 98055 Re: Appeal of Henry Daubert Rezone R-009-81 Dear Ms. Ryan: The Renton City Council at its regular meeting of May 4, 1981 considered appeal of the above-captioned rezone and Hearing Examiner's decision of March 10, 1981 . The Council concurred in the Planning and Development Committee report to reverse the Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision and grant the reclassification from G to B-1 ; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Ave. S and S 7th Street. A copy of the City Council Minutes of May 4, is attached for your information. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office or the Planning Department at 235-2550. Yours very truly, CITY OFA RENTON � � p1(10tl-a/ N- Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DM/m Enclosure cc: P'Ifanning Dept. Hearing Exam. Plan/Dev Com Chrm Council Pres. OF R4•A o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09,� CD' 235- 2550 0,917 0 SEPlegO MEMORANDUM DATE : 30 APRIL 1981 TO: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: APPEAL/HENRY DAUBERT REZONE R-009-81 FACTS AND OBERSERVATIONS : 1 . The subject property is on the southern edge of an established residential area across the street from light industrial uses. 2. Eventhough the property fronts on Shattuck Avenue South the majority of the street frontage is along South 7th Street . 3. The Hearing Examiner has stated that a man made dividers should be used as boundaries of neighborhood units . In this particular case the divider would be South 7th Street . Another planning philosophy recommends that rear yards would provide the proper use separation. The Planning Department had used this approach in their staff report . 4 . Redevelopment of the L-1 , Light Industrial properties on the south side of South 7th Street will result in the reconstruction of South 7th Street , which will actually make the street the focal point instead of a boundary . 5. Rezoning the subject property would not create a non-conforming lot . There is no mimimum lot size or frontage in the B-1 zone, however , the lot is presently non-conforming in the G zone for both lot size and width. RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE THE APPEAL. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS : 1 . Widdening of South 7th Street to include curb, gutters, sidewalks and street asphalt . Tigik OF R4,, S4/ CD THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9° co. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 "5)4 cA40' S E Pj March 25, 1981 Mary Pat Ryan 15 South Grady Way, Suite 134 Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-009-81 ; Henry Daubert Request for Rezone; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Ms. Ryan: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter. While an editorial error was made in referring to the subject property as zoned R-4 (Conclusion No. 6) , when in fact the property is zoned G (Finding No. 1 ) , there is no justification allowing modification of the recommendation of denial . The use of this relatively small lot for single family residential purposes is reasonable when compared with the B-1 classification requested by the petitioner. Reclassifying the subject property to B-1 would create a non-conforming lot and this is not compatible with the city 's policies which are to phase out rather than create non- conforming uses pursuant to Section 4-726(B) (6) . In addition, the adjacent property is still zoned for single family uses and is still so utilized. Single family uses also face the site. The recommendation to the City Council stands. The additional information submitted was reasonably available and should have been presented at the public hearing pursuant to Section 4-3015. The exclusion from consideration of the additional information does not in itself indicate that such consideration would have justified a modification of the recommendation as the current use of the subject property is reasonable and the creation of non-conforming uses should not be permitted. A new appeal period has now been established for this matter to expire on April 8, 1981 . Very truly yours , 41A—wQ ,\61-4 Fred J . Ka fman Hearing Examiner cc: Parties of Record • March 20, 1981 Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Dear Mr. Kaufman, Would you please take the time to review this letter and get back to either Mary Ryan or Henry Daubert if possible on Monday March 23rd, 1981. Mr. Daubert would like to option of a formal request for reconsideration which needs to be filed with the city clerk by Tuesday. We think you were not aware of an important fact when you made the decision to turn down the Daubert rezone in your report of March 10th, 1981 attached. In item six on page three in your third sentence you state .-.."The current R-4 zoning. ..permits reasonable use." This property is currently zoned General.-- see page 1 of same report. We think your misunderstanding of the facts may have tainted your judgement when you denied this application. The planning department told us they too were concerned about any heavy retail traffic on that site but were convinced the size of the site limited development that would create disturbance to the single family homes to the East. Applicants want to use site as office building for instance real estate or other relatively low traffic retail uses, that don't qualify as professional offices in the R-3 or R-4 zones. _ • Hopefully you can review this and possibly change your recommenda- tion and grant the applicant an approval subject to some conditions that might accomplish nearly the same goals. Thank you, All( es and Mary Ryan 1 , / (- ( i -.. Henry Daubert Mary Ryan 645 Shattuck Ave So 15 South Grady Way Menton 98055 Renton, W sh 98055 255 1618 271 5311 RECEIVED OITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER itin 2 0 1931 Am PM iv c tY it,1,311ot42tx1213e415i6 RECEIVED CITY OF RENToN HEARING E)(AM!N'R March 24+, 1981 N1AR 2 `. 031 AM PM 7c8o9r1Jc11:L.:i c% :3c,:sc5iu Fred Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Renton, Washiron Dear Fred Kaufman, Re R -009-81 As a supplement to our earlier letter where Mr. Daubert and I have asked you to reconsider the request for zoning change I am including the following attachments: Attachment A:A copy of rezone application and affidavid by MacLurg the property owner directly north of the subject property. MacLurg also wants to rezone his property to business. Also included is a statement by MacLurg saying he has no objection to allowing a variance for the one and one-half foot .set back shortage on Dauberts south boundary. We understand the property meets required setbacks on the north. Attachment B:A statement by Nelson, the third property owner zoned G Nelsons property is north of MacLurg. Nelson is going to make application to change his zoning from the G to a legal zone for his multiplex. Nelson also has no ob- jection to a business use of the Daubert property. Attachment C: A statement signed all of the owner occupants on east side of Shattuck saying they have no objection to the rezone. Aloo some additinnal information from those property owners about their immediate plans for their properties which include some critical multiple family plans. There are:, on that block: 2 duplexs 1 sixplex 3 single family rentals owned by Schwartzenberger who have recently commissioned an architect to design a 12 plex for these three lots. 4 remaining single family homes. The attachment has signatures from all of the southerly 8 owners except owner of duplex on lot 8 and rental house on lot 6. Owner of duplex had no objection but could not get together with him for a signature on the letter. The owner of the single family rental on lot 6 didn't know how he felt about signing the letter and did not want to sign it. Attachment D: A copy of the title report on Daubert property which states the vacation of a portion of the pwer line easement leaving Daubert free from easement and disecting Wolfe property. (Wolfe is the owner of the Gas Station-Wrecking Yarn which is located west of subject property) . The disection leaves Wolfe with buildable property on Dauberts west boundary. Wolfe is advertising to build to suit looking for a retail or business office tenant, Attachment E: A statement by Wolfe saying he too has no objection to a rezone of Daubert property to business and no objection to setback shortage on south fronting on Shattuck. I would like to add a couple of comments about your Conclusions in the March 10th report. Your item five regarding the area transition. It has been slow. But recently there is the new multiplex east of Daubert behind Glover property. The one Renton Place building is recently occupied. Duane Wells property fronting on Grady Way east of the Park and Ride lot has now been filled and Duane told me this morning he is just signing an agreement to sell to Puget Power and they will be developing more retail in that location in conjunction with Renton Village Company. Banker who owns Banker Towing tells me his property is no longer for sale and he plans a high rise condominium. (I don't know how firm those plans are in this money market.) The traffic count on Seventh east of Rainier in 1978 was 3166 cars per day. In 1980 the count was 4095. With the opening of the Park and Ride lot the count will be up. All of which I think makes a case for the Daubert property being less desireable as residential of any density. Your item three regarding using 7th as a man made buffer: The comprehensive plan seems to have handled the separa- tion of zoning using Shattuck as an additional buffer for the multiple family from business. The problem is to separate not only industrial: zoning from the residential but the business from the multiple family. Shattuck being a sixty foot street would buffer the business 'from the residential densities more adequately than setback lines requ ired by Sambos and the Wolfe property. Please consider this and our earlier letter dated March 20th(which I wrote at a time when I didn't know this was a formal process) a requst for reconsideration. I have ordered some additional information which I don't have available yet, for instance the actual recording of the po er lin iac . If you need any more info from us please call me. i4y,-._ . ary t Ryan 15 South Grad Way Suite 134, Renton 98055 •-^ i Attachments referenced in the letter to the Examiner from Mary Pat Ryan, received March 24, 1981 , are on file in the Examiner's office. Upon finalization of the application, the application file will be transmitted to the Planning Department, official record keeper. IFor.use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # .� AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. City Clerk' s Office For Agenda Of (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Del Mead, City Clerk (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Consent Public Hearing decision on R-009-81 - Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution • Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Appeal Other B. Hearing Examiner' s dec. 3/1.0/81 Approval : C. City Clerk' s Letter dated 4/8/81 Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: refer to Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A Planning & Dev. Committee. Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Appropriation- Expenditure Required $ Budgeted S Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) Appeal by Henry Daubert - R-009-81 - received April 8, 1981 PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF A 40 z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n 1•1 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 9 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0 Q` 917- D SEPSv_�� April 9, 1981 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 9th day of April , 1981 , at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL OF THE HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION FILED BY MARY PAT RYAN FOR MARY PAT RYAN AND HENRY DAUBERT. R-009-81 . • Delores A. Mead, City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 9th day of April , 1981 . "243-4- Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in King County ss OF RA, �D © z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 nselL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0 '9,o CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 O94TFD SEP1E°P April 8, 1981 APPEAL FILED BY HENRY DAUBERT RE: • Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated March 10, 1981 , Henry Daubert Rezone R-009-81 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $25.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee and council meetings, should you desire to attend. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Lt Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st . April 7, 1981 LA Renton City Council 'ems �._ . .` City of Renton r2 'C°;t� " W. d Municipal Building c' ��...Iva�'��'�` t? Renton, Washington \; Re: R009-81 We request the City Council review the findings and conclusions of the hearing examiner in his denial of the rezone requestfrom General to B-1 on property located at 645 Shattuck Avenue South. The planning department recom- mended approval of the application. The hearing examiner recommended denial. We agree with the Planning Departments interpretation of land use policies and comprehensive plan and believe the hearing examiner made substantial errors in fact which we will enumerate. . On page2, item 9, of the March 10, 1981 report under Findings, the hearing examiner observes; " A power line corridor is just west of the site separating the subject property from develjment along Rainier Avenue South." The west boundary of the subject site is a wrecking storage yard used by Gene Meyer towing. The power line corridor has been partially vacated leaving a buildable strip of property on the subject site's west boundary. The owner of this property is advertising to build to suit. He is looking for a retail tenant. Hense the property is not separated from the develop- ment along Rainier Avenue South. We think this is a most impor- tant fact the hearing examiner was not aware of. We think the hearing examiner might not have come to the same conclusions had he known a business will soon abut the subject properties west boundary. The remainder ,of our observations of errors are contained also in the March 10, report under the title Conclusions . Conclusion 1. The hearing examiner states the proponent must demonstrate the request. . .is in compliance with at least one of the three criteria which provide. . . a) The subject site has not been considered in a previous area wide rezone or land use analysis . b) The subject site is potentially designed for the new classification per the comprehensive plan. c) There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezone of the property or area. -1- The subject property meets not one, but all three of these criteria. Yet the hearing examiner concludes this is not a good use of land use planning. Rather the conclusion reads, the proponent has failed to show the property meets these criteria. When the hearing was conducted we did not know it was necessary to chronolize the development Whe aannexed. In uinre1948casothe the history we find the property as not planning department report discloses but sometime between 1953 and 1960 the property was annexed into the city of Renton. It was county when the zoning code was adopted in 1953, and was not a part of the area rezone at that time. l No aan rea rezoned has occured since then. The comprehensive p as commercial when it was adopted i 196the ozzpr Some of the material n was changes in the circumstances since Bank to adopted are; Mart was built in 19Baskins7, nand RobbinseStrip Burger King was built in 1968-69;Center was built in 1970. Trebors was enlarged this year. across Trebors Rainier Mortgage located RVntucky the uFriedgChicken as best any is about two years old. one can remember is about 8 years old. Sambos (235 feet north of subject site) is about six years old. The Park and Ride lot opened_ in the last three increasedmonths . Ttheetrafficncount of afrom 3166 Road across Grady Way dayin 1980. cars per day in 1978 to 4073 cars per We believe the comprehensive planbsuggested use of the property as business is a good example of land use planning. Conclusion 2. The hearing examiner discusses blighting influence attuck of business on residential. There are 16Sixroftthoseoarehmulti- between South 7th and South 6th Street. plexes . Fran Swartzenberger who owns four ofrt e r i aningsingle o family homes lives in .one and is planning plea,eshe housese at 6 612 and 614 whottuck owns and h me1at1ng 636a 12-14 Shattuck, directly easts ofthis summer.t Gloverplanning on selling to an apartment subject property is developer. Two of the remaining homes are owned by out of area investors . This is a transitional area. The owners of the single family owner occupied have objection all signed a statement which I have included saying hy frvm noe resideniio to to the change of use of Mr. Dauberts property sito be to an business . We intend for the changed use of the property improvement for the area not a blighting influence. It will upgrade the property values rather than hurt them. South 7th is a man made divider separating light Conclusion 3. comprehensive plan. industry from business and residential the man made divider separating Shattuck per comprehensive plan business from residential. If a man made divider is superior for buffering incompatible zones than setback requirements, it is only logical the hearing examiners observation complements this request rather than be an argument for denial. I think the hearing examiner here was not aware the power line had been partially vacated. Conclusion 4. The issue here is protection of the single family home to the north. This property is owned by an investor who has also signed a statement he has no objection to the rezone to busi- ness which is included. In actuality it is this property which is a blight because of the accumulated maintenance I am told is typical of transition areas . Look at this house and see for yourself who needs protection from whom.. Conclusion 5. The hearing examiner claims Burnett Park which is a quarter mile from the subject site is strengthening its residential character. I think an increased traffic count of 25% within earshot is a better indication of the character of the neighborhood. I think the Park and Ride lot sixty feet from the subject properties south boundary is a better indication of the character of the neighborhood . I think a build to suite sign on the subject properties immediate boundary is a better indication of the character of the neighborhood. I don't think the hearing examiner realizes the Burnett Park is 1400 feet from the subject property. Conclusion 6. The examiner states; "The current residence is located within six feet of a residential property to the north while the B-1 zone requires a minimum of ten feet in this location, Section 4 711-D. This section reads: No yards are required except for lots whose side yard is adjacent to a residential district where said yard regula- tions shall then be the same as in the residential district: front yards shall conform to adjacent residences; side yards to be not less than five feet. The hearing examiner erred in his observation that ten feet is required for this set back. The side yard in this location is conforming. The examiner further says the current R-4 zoning of the subject site provides a reasonable classification of the subject site and permits reasonable uses . This application is for a rezone from General to Business . Conclusion 7. The planning department recommended approval for the application.because the 4800 square foot lot was too small to be obtrusive. The hearing examiner recommended denial of the applica- tion because the 4800 square foot lot is too intense a use of the subject site. -3- The applicant is little confused. The application is consistent with the comprehensive land use plan and the planning department recommended approval. We were surprised to receive a denial by the hearing examiner. This corner location will minimize the parking requirements and accessabilitY of the applicant. The sites visibility was enhanced by the Talbot sxtention and even more so with the opening of the Park And Ride Lot. The area is in transition and it may seem slow to the hearing examiner, none the less explainable when you take into account the economic problems of Renton in the early 1970's . The applicant can not afford to collect ownership of the adjoining properties and rezone the entire block to business at this time. He feels he should not be discriminated against because he is a small property owner. There is a need for property ownership of small business sites rather than leasing from the major landlords . The area is in transition a fact agreed upon by both the planning department and the hearing examiner. The applicant believes his application should not be held up because he is only requesting a rezone of the corner lot. It is the logical location for the transition to begin. Thank you for your consideration. in arbitrating the opposing recommendations of the planning department and the hearing examiner. We think the problem with our not being granted approval by the hearing examiner is the fact he is not familiar with the with the total growth picture of the area,which we have hopefully reminded you of in the foregoing pages . Henry Daubert 645 Shattuck Avenue South Renton, Washington a //cZIA727 (eHA - Attachments : A- Map of area and signatures of property owners east of site B- Signatures of property owners north of site C- Signature of property owner west of site D- ' Title report stating partial vacation of power line easement • -4- . SNcPPIn; 12 �1 '.\ - .‘#--\ k 4-.. C< -.4,_. y P.,.Pis Nt > O 'VILLA v) tillc1:cartze PLnberger .DU 1 �Rory' Da.PL£,X1 ,SIYPIX.2. Schwartzenberger _ 1 fY113O.5 FUTURt31I qi IG r 1.2.Schwartzenberger ZU RIX plc5 �\ Schwartzelnbergerj I ` Q \` clL X `Ons tott J j DGPLX ` I ' 1RECKI1Nelson(} Hutchinson / \ 1 YARD I MacLur g III I , _Wolf sup,iy Glover I I _ S - -- - 7Th -- - 5r - - � A-RK AND 421DF BA kERS sF u.a� REN ToN I vv R aC k liv CoNc i-�E \O RD AIL `� 1f vRcc v11 I We the following owners of property on Shattuck east of - Henry Dauberts property at 645 Shattuck do not have any objection to a rezone of 645 Shattuck to Business. 1 se - Mel Glover 636 Shattuck Lots 10& 11 (7 7 ' - 1 se • Trov Hutchinson 632 Shattuck Lot 9 � '' `` L .yt,-7_ • *-' James Gorden 628 Shattuck Lot 8 Ise Zon Onstott 626 Shattuck Lot 7 VL cr"1 -1910-744&It:7 :al Vitali Chonin 616 Shattuck Lot 6 :a1 Fran Swartzenberger6L4 Shatxuck_Lo •1411) /44efile-1 a :al Fran`$wartzenberger 612k Shattuck Lot 4 iI :al Frarcichwaaaauberger 610 Shattyck Lot 3 . . These two property owners own the two lots north of subject property, Nelsons is the eightplex and MacLurg is the single family home directly north. To whom it may concern: I awn the property north of Daubert,the 33 foot lot. I • have no objection to the Daubert rezone to business. I am aware his south setback does not meet requirements and the requirements are there to protect the livibility of my property. A rezone of Dauberts property will not ,in my opinion adversely affect my property in any way. Thank you, 4L MacL 3214 N cf�scin/ U2C To wham it may concern: I own the property north of MacLurg on the West side of Shattuck. It is an eightplex. I have no objection to a rezone of the Daubert property to business zoning. I have no objection to the Daubert property not meeting the setback on its south side facing South Seventh. I see no reason why the use of the Daubert property as a small business site will adversely affect • my property. ATTACHMENT C "Wore" To Wham it May Concern: I own the property east of Henry Dauberts propertyin Renton. I have received a vacation of a portion of the power line easement which leaves me enough buildable property to erect a building. I am advertising for a tenant with a build to suit sign. I have no objection to a rezone of the Daubert property to buiness and have no objection to a side yard variance because of a one and one half foot shortage of set back requirements. ATTACHMENT D Title report on Daubert property Order No . 51('n ' October 28 , 1980 DESCRIPTION: That portion of Government Lot 16 in Section 18 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows : $ Beginning at the intersection of the North line of South 144th Street (being the North line of 7th Avenue in the City of Renton produced West) with the West line of Shattuck Street in said City of Renton as platted in Smither's 5th Addition, as per plat recorded in Volume 16 of Plats on page 33, records of King County; thence West along said North line 120 feet; thence North parallel with said West line of Shattuck Street, 40 feet ; thence East parallel with said North line of South 144th Street, 120 fee to said West line of Shattuck Street; thence South along said West line 40 feet to point of beginning; • Page 2 Order No . 5100E EXCEPTIONS: A. 1% Excise tax, if unpaid. -. • B. General taxes, as follows, together—with interest after delinquency : Tax Accv. No. Year ;mount Billed Amount Paid 182305- O: -.A-910 ---. $194. 90 $194 . 90 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: United. States of America Purpose: Electric power transmission lines Area Affected: Within a_strip of land '250 feet in width , boundaries of said strip lying 62 . 50 feet distant Southwesterly -from and 187 . 50 feet • ._distant Northeasterly from and parallel to the --survey line of the Covington-Seattle • transmission line as now located and staked on the ground 2. Recording No. : -3207080 (Affects Westerly portion of property herein described) ..Said •easement was parp , l.1y..: released •as. � a •oz.tion of. property herein „Q. P.-. P F Y _IPsc abed by instrumept�.recur,� �`vR tecoirdifi No.•--7902©9;0'718.1 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: NEED C0° ES TO: SENT CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. RECORD CHRONICLE (PRESS) MAYOR' S OFFICE n x CITY COUNCIL =a- FINANCE DEPARTMENT X HEARING EXAMINER X PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7C- PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PARK DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT P/04A &5---r . �_._ CITY OF RENTON No. 17746 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASH3NGION 98055 J 19 "I RECEIVED OF// CL!,/ -32,--i,„,_ __as--00 ,. TOTAL , 9,c() 0 GWEN E. MAR9. 1,4 FINANC DI CTOR / OF RA, %, ® 0 THE CITY OF RENTON • MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0130 43' CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0 SEPlekt° April 8, 1981 APPEAL FILED BY HENRY DAUBERT RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner' s Decision Dated March 10, 1981 , Henry Daubert Rezone R-009-81 To Parties of Record: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 30, City Code, written appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk, along with the proper fee of $25.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council ' s Planning and Development Committee and will be considered by the City Council when the matter is reported out of Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee and council meetings, should you desire to attend. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st OF .► : E.,� .-, THE CITY OF RENTON �P .;) , z ,��'` ex MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER -$) Go- 'O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,94' 1) SEP1°��P March 25, 1981 Mary Pat Ryan 15 South Grady Way, Suite 134 Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-009-81 ; Henry Daubert Request for Rezone; Request for Reconsideration. Dear Ms. Ryan: I have reviewed your request for reconsideration in the above entitled matter. While an editorial error was made in referring to the subject property as zoned R-4 (Conclusion No. 6) , when in fact the property is zoned G (Finding No. 1 ) , there is no justification allowing modification of the recommendation of denial . The use 'of this relatively small lot for single family residential purposes is reasonable when compared with the B-1 classification requested by the petitioner. ' Reclassifying the subject property to B-1 would create a non-conforming lot and this is not compatible with the city's policies which are to phase out rather than create non- conforming uses pursuant to Section 4-726(B) (6) . In addition, the adjacent property is still zoned for single family uses and is still so utilized. Single family uses also face the site. The recommendation to the City Council stands. The additional information submitted was reasonably available and should have been presented at the public hearing pursuant to Section . 4-3015. The exclusion from consideration of the additional information does not in itself indicate that such consideration would have justified -: a modification of the recommendation as the current use of the subject property is reasonable and the creation of non-conforming uses should not be permitted. A new appeal period has now been established for this matter to expire on April 8, 1981 . Very truly yours, "1 milVC± Fred J. Ka fman Hearing Examiner cc: Parties of Record March 20, 1981 Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Dear Mr. Kaufman, Would you please take the time to review this letter and get back to either Mary Ryan or Henry Daubert if possible on Monday March 23rd, 1981. Mr. Daubert would like to option of a formal request for reconsideration which needs to be filed with the city clerk by Tuesday. We think you were not aware of an important fact when you made the decision to turn down the Daubert rezone in your report of March 10th, 1981 attached. In item six on page three in your third sentence you state .. ."The current R-4 zoning. . .permits reasonable use." This property is currently zoned General.- see page 1 of same report. We think your misunderstanding of the facts may have tainted your judgement when you denied this application. The planning department told us they too were concerned about any heavy retail traffic on that site but were convinced the size of the site limited development that would create disturbance to the single family homes to the East. Applicants want to use site as office building for instance real estate or other relatively low traffic retail uses, that don't qualify as professional offices in the R-3 or R-4 zones. Hopefully you can review this and possibly change your recommenda- tion and grant the applicant an approval subject to some conditions that might accomplish nearly the same goals. - Thank you, /G!1/sr/ r nxy b e and Mary Ryan ./; (; , l j._.. . Henry Daubert Mary Ryan 645 Shattuck Ave So 15 South Grady Way _ Renton 98055 Renton, W sh 98055 255 1618 271 5311 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 1\?/M2 0 1981 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER March 24, 1981 AM MAR ' : 1931 PM 718o9,10011:'=: 121 31"j s:>oii Fred Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Renton, Washiron Dear Fred Kaufman, Re R -009-81 As a supplement to our earlier letter where Mr. Daubert and I have asked you to reconsider the request for zoning change I am including the following attachments: Attachment A:A copy of rezone application and affidavid by MacLurg the property owner directly north of the subject property. MacLurg also wants to rezone his property to business. Also included is a statement by MacLurg saying he has no objection to allowing a variance for the one and one-half foot set back shortage on Dauberts south boundary. We understand the property meets required setbacks on the north. Attachment B:A statement by Nelson, the third property owner zoned G Nelsons property is north of MacLurg. Nelson is going to make application to change his zoning from the G to a legal zone for his multiplex. Nelson also has no ob- jection to a business use of the D,.:ubert property. Attachment C: A statement signed all of the owner occupants on east side of Shattuck saying they have no objection to the rezone. Aloo some additional information from those property owners about their immediate plans for their properties which include some critieal multiple family plans. There are; on that block: 2 duplexs 1 sixplex 3 single family rentals owned by Schwartzenberger who have recently commissioned an architect to design a 12 plex for these three lots. 4 remaining single family homes. The attachment has signatures from all of the southerly 8 owners except owner of duplex on lot 8 and rental house on lot 6. Omer of duplex had no objection but could not get together with him for a signature on the letter. The owner of the single family rental on lot 6 didn't know how he felt about signing the letter and did not want to sign it. Attachment D: A copy of the title report on Daubert property which states • the vacation of a portion of the pwer line easement leaving Daubert free from easement and disecting Wolfe property. (Wolfe is the owner of the Gas Station-Wrecking Yarn which is located west of subject property) . The disection leaves Wolfe with buildable property on Dauberts west boundary. Wolfe is advertising to build to suit looking for a retail or business office tenant. Attachment E: A statement by Wolfe saying he too has no objection to a rezone of Daubert property to business and no objection to setback shortage on south fronting on Shattuck. I would like to add a couple of comments about your Conclusions in the March 10th report. Your item five regarding the area transition. It has been slow. But recently there is the new multiplex east of Daubert behind Glover property. The one Renton Place building is recently occupied. Duane Wells property fronting on Grady Way east of the Park and Ride lot has now been filled and Duane told me this morning he is just signing an agreement to sell to Puget Power and they will be developing more retail in that location in conjunction with Renton Village Company. Banker who owns Banker Towing tells me his property is no longer for sale and he plans a high rise condominium. (I don't know how firm those plans are in this money market.) The traffic count on Seventh east of Rainier in 1978 was 3166 cars per day. In 1980 the count was 4095. With the opening of the Park and Ride lot the count will be up. All of which I think makes a case for the Daubert property being less desireable as residential of any density. Your item three regarding using 7th as a man made buffer: The comprehensive plan seems to have handled the separa- tion of zoning using Shattuck as an additional buffer for the multiple family from business. The problem is to separate not only industrial,•zoning from the residential but the business from the multiple family. Shattuck being a sixty foot street would buffer the business from the residential densities more adequately than setback lines requ ired by Sambos and the Wolfe property. Please consider this and our earlier letter dated March 20th(which I wrote at a time when I didn't know this was a formal process) a requst for reconsideration. I have ordered some additional information which I don't have available yet, for instance the actual recording of the po er lin Jac . If you need any more info from us please call me. ary $t Ryan 15 South Grad Way Suite 134, Renton 98055 • Attachments referenced in the letter to the Examiner from Mary Pat Ryan, received March 24, 1981 , are on file in the Examiner's office. Upon finalization of the application, the application file will be transmitted to the Planning Department, official record keeper. 4 r . March 20, 1981 Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Dear Mr. Kaufman, Would you please take the time to review this letter and get back to either Mary Ryan or Henry Daubert if possible on Monday March 23rd, 1981. Mr. Daubert would like to option of a formal request for reconsideration which needs to be filed with the city clerk by Tuesday. We think you were not aware of an important fact when you made the decision to turn down the Daubert rezone in your report of March 10th, 1981 attached. In item six on page three in your third sentence you state . . ."The current R-4 zoning. . .permits reasonable use." This property is currently zoned General.-- see page 1 of same report. We think your misunderstanding of the facts may have tainted your judgement when you denied this application. The planning department told us they too were concerned about any heavy retail traffic on that site but were convinced the size of the site limited development that would create disturbance to the single family homes to the East. Applicants want to use site as office building for instance real estate or other relatively low traffic retail uses, that don't qualify as professional offices in the R-3 or R-4 zones. Hopefully you can review this and possibly change your recommenda- tion and grant the applicant an approval subject to some conditions that might accomplish nearly the same goals. Thank you, nary er and Mary Ryan Henry Daubert Mary Ryan 645 Shattuck Ave So 15 South Grady Way Renton 98055 Renton, W sh 98055 255 1618 271 5311 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON I-tEAflrNC EXAMINER NM 2 0 1981 AM PM 4 3Pas„9.1t12!1aZ3P4a516 March 10, 1981 • OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Henry Daubert FILE NO. R-009-81 LOCATION: Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to 8-1 for potential use as a remodeled office. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Denial PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on February 18, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 24, 1981 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report , and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor' s Map Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map Mr. Blaylock advised that the area south of the subject site is in a transitional stage with a recent increase in land use intensity. The Examiner requested clarification of the planning practices pertaining to "back-onto" or "side-to-rear" configurations denoted in Section L. 1 of the Planning Department report. Mr. Blaylock explained the policy which is utilized to minimize impact from commercial developments to single family residential uses. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Henry Daubert 645 Shattuck Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 The Examiner inquired if the applicant concurred in recommendations contained in the staff report . Mr. Daubert indicated that the property will be sold and remodeling will be accomplished by the developer. Mr. Blaylock advised the concern of the Planning Department that improvement to S. 7th Street be required as a condition of approval and suggested that restrictive covenants be imposed to sa ce tofo the city.rezone, also noted that an environmental review would not be requiredefor sthe nremodelin He thereby eliminating the possibility of imposition of landscape buffer or fencing project , to protect the single family residential use to the north. The Examiner inquired pifvas�ons recommendation of denial should have been made by the department. Mr. Blaylock felt that the rezone was appropriate in view of the recent transition of uses in the area, but concern regarding the actual configuration of the remodeled building may be mitigated through a requirement of site plan approval by the Examiner. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the distance between the subject site the adjacent residence to the north, Mr. Blaylock advised that an ll-foot width exists could which is insufficient to create a landscape buffer; however, an architectural fenceand be discussed during site plan approval . R-0.09-81 Page Two - The -:Exam:iner•. r-eq`uestetd fu:rth.er.. comments: in- support' or '.opposia:iOn-,•to the app.l i.c•ation. ;:, • S rote there wa's:= no.. resporise,-; the hearing: re`gard i ng.., i le No. ',R-0.09-.81 .was cl:oed:'by the Examiner:;a:t,:.9`:47::a:.m::: :• . .. • s ` 'FI,ND`I NGS C;ONCLUSO.NS: ;`RECOMMEDATI Mi Hawing, rev:iewed;.the recorda.n.:`thia'.mater " the ;. - :xamfiner now ma: es'= and, enter ',:••th6 :followng FIN"DINGS: . 1 ::` ',-wThe reque's.t,:,.is for., approval. 'of. a reclassification of approximately 4,80.0 square feet ...:from G, (Gene:ral:;, Single Family-Residential , Minimum ,lot .size - 35,000E- square feet). to B=1'.•(,Bus i'ness%,Commerc.i al) . H. 2.,,'''.;The.:appl,icatiOn, file containIng, 'the application, SEPA documentation, t'he-,Planning'' ' ..Department,:report,' and other pertinent documents was entered. into the record as.: Exhibit 1 .,. • 3: ':.Pursuant to the .City 'of. Renton:'s Environmental Ordinance and the•State;.;`Environmental . . ,:Po1,i'cy',Act of 1971 ,,• R':.C.W.' 43.21 .'C. , as amended:, -a. 'Declaration`';o'f: Non-Signifi.cance' •has'':.been issued for.the subject proposal .by the Environmental Review •Commi ttee, ' • -:respon'sib•l;e official - • • 4. P:l:ans:-.for the proposal -have been .reviewed by all ' city departments affected by the . . ,impact of `this development ,.. 5: ` All existing • utilities are available a • nd. i,n close Proximity: 6.. . The subject .site i s, located at the northwest .corner-.of., Shattu'ck`:Aven',ue S.':'an' ' Street ' •The ,s;i'te i,s• level and is currently occup.ied:.by a single .family 'resi'den'ce7th : : .. . ._:and;.detached garage. . . , . , .7. . The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in, which the subject: site 'i:s located:as '. 'su i ta:bl e .for the- development of_ business and. :commercial. uses::, '•The :area. south:of the:• .'subject , site i s:- designated- for light, i n'dust r i a.l . uses. a: ':.;-,-.(he subject :S'1,te 15 at the. eXta•eme s~' outh'.and west,end of an' extensive. ;R'-.4 "-(;Hi:gh `Density Multifamily "Res:i.dent.i al-)--:zone.•south and..east .of-the,";Central. .Bus:i '• The site i s one;of.-th.r arcel s..zoned G and i:s bounded on ;.the west b' g,n.l sZoni str-i'ct. ; , = ,fronting along Ra in: erefY n ng zoned •L-1 : ,Avenu S<.." P`roperty south of;-,tFe:s•itei'across, .S. :7th::.S•treet`.'1'ia 9• . `The:area in: Which h -the subject, property' is._;located 'i .•.�r,-.es,i•dent:i al:.` The eastern;:block-..'front s s.ti�'11,�,prpdornvi:nanaay, ;single, :,f.,ami.l �~ a-long• Shattuck :Avenue ,S..:faci•ng the subject..si te: , `is •almost exclusi've1; s'in� le family: msl•-a-lmos i, y 9' ' Nor,:th .of ':the•s.ubject. siite. ',i,-s'"a_-low d • y..:unit': . South, of the-ifte across G-,:.7th Street 'i:s;' an r':auto•wr' "' i ng,i;yard '' Immediately;north, of the site ,is a, single ,fami.l eShatt yar:d. Avenue, t +are. single-.fhe. 1 homes:',,..:. Y.,home, : Directly across• Shattuck". Y The.,Metro Park and--Ride Lot'•i s'•:al;so: .sout_h. .o:f.:the, .s;i te.�: .:A .power,l.i ne corridor i•s. ':' " :.f-rom i d . - i s jus_t_.wast_of.: the, 'site separating.' the;sub ect` _ro "e: t ' . development along.'Rainier ;Avenue'•S: 1. P P y The- north si.de� • ��, ,' _-,yard between the .subject.,site-'and'•the: abut i-s about`5;5. f ttin.g.•.5:'ing.je: family residence , ., 1 1 . The record �. • discloses that• two rezones i.n..•the,. ar and•.•the Rhienhard .es •t49- 0 ea.. .,the Chri':5'0Pliers.o'n ,•.(R�644 J'':'' 7 ). •'rezone both occurred -more • 70:) :rezone. then;'ten years ago:. 12 . ':,The` Planning Department indicated that creation of Propert:y.,.an.d the residential use`.co the`north woulda -buffer ,cult du the. subject' and 1.oca t i on of :the existing residence. ; . be d i:f f;i cu l t due- to•.the�'s lie " ;1.,3: :The gurnett Linear P ark i_s located about' blocks to 'the east of the i,4• Ttie •Hu l 1 rezone R- 4_- ' sub j act s i te, ( 39 79) request for property located. et S.• 4t.h Street a . 'Avenue S.. was, denied. .: ;The a 1 icant had requested a, reclassification 'and Burnett CONCL` from R-3 :to. R-4 US I:ONS: : . . • ,. . 'I,.' `Th-e;:proPonent`::of=,a .rezone must demonstrate ,that �th'e. . : .an'd-'w.i, 11 not impair the public health,. safety and ,welfa.resin'i-adi-n toe public inanOe'st_. . w-i-th 'a_t. ,lea:st one of the,`thr,,ee,',criteria, .listed.' in ,Section '4-301'0 which r ddi,tion to :.comp'liance::..part that; '. • P oy.ides i,n l""_„v w';: a ' tii'- ^',...Rix ari:._...,. ...u. .ems. .�+5°w`;i _�,.._... �_:..a,�.-' _ ... rt:flti:.._.r;%.i^::`'t e:f!,: .,......_ ;3-.=:rr.;- !`J".%'-, .,. _..:• _ , . . .. u. .. . • . .. ... - R-009-di Page Three a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis ; or b. The subject site is pote ally designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or/ c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the requested reclassification is in the public interest, is a good example of land use planning, and will not adversely affect neighboring properties. 2. The Comprehensive Plan map element should not be read alone and cannot be used without reference to the various goals and policies. Residential districts should be protected from blighting influences and property values should be protected through effective control of land use. &eclassi 1 f �, i , not effective control �c.Lng-the suh'ect si a to of land use (Page 17, Land Use Report, Comprehensive Plan) . 3. As the record indicates, good planning practice would use naturally occurring or man made buffers as a first choice in separating incompatible zones from one another. Page 4 of the Renton Urban Report states that man made dividers should be used to form boundaries of neighborhood units to achieve at least an approximation of the ideal . Extending the commercial zoning to this corner lot at this junction is not good land use planning and does not make effective use of the man made divider that S. 7th Street serves as in this location. 4. The site leaves very little room in which to provide an adequate buffer between the proposed B-I zone and commercial use and the existing single family home abutting to the north. N.E. 7th Street, an existing road, makes a more dramatic natural buffer in which to delineate a transition zone between the more intense uses to the south and the residential area surrounding the subject site. S. While the area was seen to be in transition, the transition has been quite slow and with the development of the new Burnett Linear Park, the area has actually maintained and strengthened its residential character. Shopping districts are located relatively close to the bite. Both Renton Village and Renton Center . re within a couple of blocks and serve as positive amenities for residential living. 6. The reclassification of the subject property to B-1 would create a non-conforming use. The currant residence is located within six feet -of_ the- rasiden-ti ro ert to the north while the B-I zone requires a minimumtn h L� c y (Section 4-711 (D)) . The conversion of the existing residence toecommercialthis 1purp se therefore should not be permitted under any circumstances. The current R-4 purposes of the subject site _provides a reasonable -classification of the si-aille-ctAgniaa 7ifie And . permits reasonable use, and it would be inappropriate to reclassify the property to B- I . Classification to B-1 would intrude into the residential nature of the block and create a non-conforming yard which would be difficult to utilize for buffering purposes. Commercial use would infringe on the quiet enjoyment of the residential properties to the north and east.' 7. As precedent , the Hull rezone attempt was denied. In that case, the applicant requested a reclassification to R-4 of an existing R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) parcel . The Hull property was located just south of the business district on S. 4th and Burnett Avenue S. The request was denied because the requested classification was considered too intense a use in an area which was still primarily single family. The current request would convert an existing single family lot and use into a commercial use and this again is too an intense a use of the subject site, a 4,800 square foot. lot , and should be denied. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should deny the reclassification of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 10th day of March, 1981 . TI-41-1/1 Fred J. fman Land Use earing xaminer • + . R-009-81 Page. Four TRANSMITTED THI S.,,.10th day of March, 1981 by ;'Aff i day i t of mailing to the;.parties of record: ,Henry;Daubert, 645 Shattuck.Avenue S , Renton, WA'. .98055 P9t.,Ryan, tl5 S Grady`Way, Suite 134, Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of March, 1981,' _to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard 'Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David_ Clemens, Acting, Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be .;filed in writing on or before March, 24, 1981 . Any aggrieved person' -feeling'.that''tile . decision of the Examiner is based wit-erroneous procedure, .'errors, of law or fact, error judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably avai lable'at.: the prior hearing may make a written request for review by' the Examiner within fourteen (14), days from the date of the.,.Examiner's decision. This request .shall set forth the: specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further, action as he deems An; appeal to the City Council is' governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal ..be. filed: with the City, Clerk accompanying a filing fee of .$25.00 :and meeting other Specified requirements Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection',' in ' ,the Finance Department, first floor of 'City..Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER March 24, 1981 AM f�9AR2 `. 1081 s� PM 718819;lO,Jlor:3 12s3141516 Fred Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner �, City of Renton ` ' Renton, Washiron Dear Fred Kaufman, Re R -009-81 As a supplement to our earlier letter where Mr. Daubert and I have asked you to reconsider the request for zoning change I am including the following attachments: Attachment A:A copy of rezone application and affidavid by MacLurg the property owner directly north of the subject property. MacLurg also wants to rezone his property to business. Also included is a statement by MacLurg saying he has no objection to allowing a variance for the one and one-half foot ,set back shortage on Dauberts south boundary. We understand the property meets required setbacks on the north. Attachment B:A statement by Nelson, the third property owner zoned G Nelsons property is north of MacLurg. Nelson is going to make application to change his zoning from the G to a legal zone for his multiplex. Nelson also has no ob- jection to a business use of the Daubert property. Attachment C: A statement signed all of the owner occupants on east side of Shattuck saying they have no objection to the rezone. Al©o some additional information from those property owners about their immediate plans for their properties which include some critical multiple family plans . There are on 'that block: 2 duplexs 1 sixplex 3 single family rentals owned by Schwartzenberger who have recently commissioned an architect to design a 12 plex for these three lots. 4 remaining single family homes . The attachment has signatures from all of the southerly 8 owners except owner of duplex on lot 8 and rental house on lot 6. Omer of duplex had no objection but could not get together with him for a signature on the letter. The owner of the single family rental on lot 6 didn't know how he felt about signing the letter and did not want to sign it. Attachment D: A copy of the title report on Daubert property which states the vacation of a portion of the pwer line easement leaving Daubert free from easement and disecting Wolfe property. (Wolfe is the owner of the Gas Station-Wrecking YarH which is located west of subject property) . The disection leaves Wolfe with buildable property on Dauberts west boundary. Wolfe is advertising to build to suit looking for a retail or business office tenant. Attachment E: A statement by Wolfe saying he too has no objection to a rezone of Daubert property to business and no objection to setback shortage on south fronting on Shattuck. I would like to add a couple of comments about your Conclusions in the March 10th report. Your item five regarding the area transition. It has been slow. But recently there is the new multiplex east of Daubert behind Glover property. The one Renton Place building is recently occupied. Duane Wells property fronting on Grady Way east of the Park and Ride lot has now been filled and Duane told me this morning he is just signing an agreement to sell to Puget Power and they will be developing more retail in:that location in conjunction with Renton Village Company. Banker who owns Banker Towing tells me his property is no longer for sale and he plans a high rise condominium. (I don't know how firm those plans are in this money market.) The traffic count on Seventh east of Rainier in 1978 was 3166 cars per day. In 1980 the count was 4095. With the opening of the Park and Ride lot the count will be up. All of which I think makes a case for the Daubert property being less desireable as residential of any density. Your item three regarding using 7th as a man made buffer: The comprehensive plan seems to have handled the separa- tion of zoning using Shattuck as an additional buffer for the multiple family from business. The problem is to separate not only industrial: zoning from the residential but the business from the multiple family. Shattuck being a sixty foot street would buffer the business from the residential densities more adequately than setback lines requ ired by Sambos and the Wolfe property. Please consider this and our earlier letter dated March 20th(which I wrote at a time when I didn't know this was a formal process) a requst for reconsideration. I have ordered some additional information which I don't have available yet, for instance the actual recording of the per lin ac _ . If you need any more info from us please call me. ary at Ryan 15 South Grad Way Suite 134, Renton 98055 Attachments referenced in the letter to the Examiner from Mary Pat Ryan, received March 24, 1981 , are on file in the Examiner's office. Upon finalization of the application, the application file will be transmitted to the Planning Department, official record keeper. PART OF ATTACHMENT A MacLurg To whom it may concern: I own the property north of Daubert,the 33 foot lot. I have no objection to the Daubert rezone to business. I am aware his south setback does not meet requirements and the requirements are there to protect the livibility of my property. A rezone of Dauberts property will not in my opinion adversely affect my property in any way. Thank you, MacL i1-sir/ 04. Ff• D V` I ,,:: Jason MacLur . : ,. - being:- duly' sworn,::.:4e;clare- :-,that . 'I . ..:,aril .the::owner `of the property involved' in :this application and:',`th'at,,.the , - foregoing statement* and answers;-herein:'contained and the"information , ',herewith..submitted.,are: in all respects: true .and -correct to the-:::heat :of my:`.knowledge :and belief, : : - - Subscribed, and:sworn':before <.me a : 5 - of D�c�ri&•8�fZ-= 19-gl? I this j' day . Notary4P-ublic;;::in::•and' for the. State .of.`, -Washington,, residing at •. T.MToN. - } • P-;- : . / , „ - (Name. Of otary,.Eublic gn . ;- a ( ur ° caner - 1108 - 24th Avenue;-:.#A • 7� � L:/LPL , . e = (AddressJ:_ (Address) , .i- � Washin ton. :981_l2 - 11 Seattle, g:. . (Ci'ty;) ;(State) 3.q- 42.76)- ' - . .(Te;leph'one} (FOR OFFICE; USE ON•LY):'.. CERTIFI CA TION, ':. ,. This is :.to certi_f.y,:,.that. the foregoing application .has . been .i`n's.-p:ected by me and` has; been fourid:::to.. b,e thorough' and, .complet;e-,,in every particular to.' orm ' to,:t'he::.,rules and=; regulations '-of, the Renton Planning . Department governing -the filing°:of such application . - R:enyto.n: :Pla'nn' ng Depf: • • CITY. OE RENTON REZONE O..lE PLI�A P CATION A 1ON Q .OFFICE' USE,, .ONLY-'' ::LA"ND U,SE •NEARING: A:PPLI,CATIO"N N:O:°. • • - • ' niE'R'S .ACT.I:ON •• .' '+ APPLICA•T.ION: `F'EE .'.�. ` :: APPEAL; FILED ..., - • " , ;"., ,CITY.."COUNCI'L .A:CTION. �:-.-':•,,,-,:.,. �:. . .� : ". _ " _.. FILING'..'DATE ORD.IN'AN,CE. NO;., AN.D„''DATE .".'. �' HEARING':DATTE." _ APPLICANT,'_TO COMP LE.TE'-,ITEMS "1 THROUGH 10 :. -. : 1 : . Name,:'' .:. MacLurg `Phone_ ' 329� 11.08,�.: Address -1108:-•24th '.Ave°:East Ap.t;A' Seattle _'' pe y ' :_ . .. `" �3-'�:':� 'P.ro ,ert Petitioned for rezoning :is'•;locate:d on.,.�:Shat � - -tuck- - between-`' $outh 7th Street South'::6:th..Street and Square' : t.. P-> 3960:: .:.-q. _„ „ foo age or_ acreage of property - Le a.l't'`descr ton_ `o:f:,..property if more :space' is .:re hired';:attach 'a '_ '.` ' , g P ate:::she'e't):,. : FXi`s=t,ing ,"Zo General:..: ..• n%nq ,. .. - - nin 'Requested-. - . . - - . APPLICANT:,``•: The: following, factors :are' 'conside'red i'ii';:recl'ass; 'fying property. Evidence" or•'additional information <tor substantiate - your request' may:" be�'"at'tached ."to :this..•sheet': ;'(`Se;e' .Application:.: Procedure ,.Sheet'for specific requirements ) Submi't 'this. form; i n.:.dup l':irate • - ' :Propos,ed:;:use:'of ite Plans are' .un'"e' ..., P d fined °�Hoine° 'is 'almost ;beyond";salvage,;": Lot.is too:: � ;_ . • smaalr-for`.use by:'almost; :enyone :except:"the; adjacent-:property owners;: Adjacent' property °;interested :'.in purchasing the -property. for:future. development Present building' should::be torn..down ` t",Garage'ris,:encro,,,a`ching on southerly' `lot setbacks,: �rope'rty s hasn,' 'been ': ma retained :for_°years Ceiling_ n build ngs 'are,,,not'-s'tandard::height.'':::Noyard!.rdaintenance•-for ::'s'ome Buie;.... xpeet p um Ong.an :-wiring;;to; a su stari ar S.. ;`:. Lists the .mea`s;ures to.:.b.e: taken:to,'.reduce` im'"act., on ,the surround .ri area. ATTACHMENT B Nelson To whom it may concern: I own the property north of MacLurg on the West side of Shattuck. It is an eightplex. I have no objection to a rezone of the Daubert property to business zoning. I have no objection to the Daubert property not meeting the setback on its south side facing South Seventh. I see no reason why the use of the Daubert property as a small business site will adversely affect my property. ATTACHMENT C EAST SHATTUCK To the city of R )n Hearing Examiner, We the following owners of property on Shattuck Henry Dauberts property at 645 Shattuck do not have any objection to a rezone of 645 Shattuck to Business. House . Mel Glover 636 Shattuck Lots 10& 11 house , Troy Hutchinson 632 Shattuck Lot 9 (//c L- ' .; 4A4 James Gorden 628 Shattuck Lot 8 house 'ton Onstott 626 Shattuck Lot 7 61-( ervEc `q 0,,c.,,L4.4A) rental Vitali Chonin 616Shattuck Lot 6 rental Fr,A2Swartzenberger614 Shattuck Lo J#% / .ek,A..) /41 a rental �� Fran_ Swartzenberger 612� Shattuck Lot 4 rental Fra Sch�a`t as xyberger 610�Shattgck Lot 3 Note: Fran Schwartzenberger tells me she has en architect working on plans for a 12-plex on lots3, 4 and 5. Mel Glover tells me he is planning on selling to an apartment developer. He lives on lots 10 and 11. Glover, Hutchinson and Onstott are the only owner occupants of homes on east side of Shattuck and they have all three signed the above statement they have no objection to the Daubert rezone. () cY ' 1-i011P: , flex zo ,,,i . \., (Y �/I ��i � SY 0. 61 Schwartzenberger P , •�G � big O Six Plea€ ��''� Schwartzenberger G „O4b- �oS35ii, (:. 11;1. C' _1�0 _ _ Schwartzenberger e ``� \ /0, Sambos - 12 - N �� ` ` Sl hwart_zenberger Schwartzenberger Future 12-plex cs, +,,,, c f`m s4 93 A :�, f5,...„co Schwartzenberger 6,J $4 v i. el' Z i. �0 Choili ��► Zi�/ �� \ \ ORS a , = e O j I• 1 • �I 0 Nelson h '� 0� y kt en Gordon Duplex' r z Ac. I 1� k ` 0.3 . 8 �� y oIp t ; �9'I H ychinAson}D ° N 0 1c.0 i8r.s. 1 c Urg Colvtsc' h ,31 41?f 0 hh t / __tt i O �� 0 1.6�p l , . 14 / �� 'el0 V U .�I7 — Wrecking Yard Daubert Mover i ' o'" �_.,_. opt- it i- / Eightplex F TN 1 - �.. • • • ATTACHMENT D Title report on Daubert property Order No . 51002S October 28 , 1980 DESCRIPTION: That portion of Government Lot 16 in Section 18 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the North line of South 144th Street (being the North line of 7th Avenue in the City of Renton produced West) with the West line of Shattuck Street in said City of Renton as platted in Smither's 5th Addition, as per plat recorded in Volume 16 of Plats on page 33 , records of King County; thence West along said North line 120 feet; thence North parallel with said West line of Shattuck Street, 40 feet ; thence East parallel with said North line of South 144th Street , 120 feet to said West line of Shattuck Street ; thence South along said West line 40 feet to point of beginning; Page 2 Order No . 510028 EXCEPTIONS: A. 1% Excise tax, if unpaid. B. General taxes, as follows , together with interest after delinquency : Tax Acc No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid 182305- 134 0 1980 $194. 90 $194 . 90 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: United States of America Purpose: Electric power transmission lines Area Affected: Within a strip of land 250 feet in width , the boundaries of said strip lying 62 . 50 feet distant Southwesterly from and 187 . 50 feet distant Northeasterly from and parallel to the survey line of the Covington-Seattle transmission line as now located and staked on the ground 2 . Recording No. : 3207080 (Affects Westerly portion of property herein described) Said easement was partially released as to & portion of property,,herein described by instrument recorded under Recording No . 790209-0718j 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF : Grantee: Defense Plant Corporation, a corporation created by an Act of Congress entitled ATTACHMENT E "Woffe" To Whom it May Concern: I own the property east of Henry Dauberts propertyin Renton. I have received a vacation of a portion of_ the power line easement which leaves me enough buildable property to erect a building. I am advertising for a tenant with a build to suit sign. I have no objection to a rezone of the Daubert property to buiness and have no objection to a side yard variance because of a one and one half foot shortage of set back requirements . U( NC 'E OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETER \TION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY INC. (ECF-004-81 ) Application for rezone, file R-004-81 , of one acre site from G to M-P to allow construction of State Motor Vehicle Inspection Station for automobile emissions ; property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street. 2 . HENRY DAUBERT (ECF-006-81 ) Application for rezone, file R-009-81 , from G to B-1 to allow for potential use as a remodeled office on an approximate 4 , 800 square foot site; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street. 3 . CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECF-009-81 ) Application for revision of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance. This revision will modify procedures and regulations implementing the PUD Ordinance in compliance with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has further issued a proposed declaration of significance for the following projects : 1 . JAMES E. BANKER (ECF-623-80) Application for special permit, file SP-111-80, to construct 5-story (65 ' ) office and condominium complex which would exceed the maximum standard of 35 feet in the L-1 zone; property located at 405 South 7th Street. 2. VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. (ECF-004-81 ) Application for site approval, file SA-005-81 , in M-P zone to allow construction of a 4 ,200 square foot motor vehicle emissions testing facility on a one acre site ; property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street. 3. MARRIOTT CORPORATION/BOB' S BIG BOY RESTAURANT (ECF-007-81 ) Application for building permit, file B-246, to construct 5, 600 square foot restaurant with 70 parking spaces ; property located on the northeast corner of Edwards Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by February 16, 1981 . Published: February 2, 1981 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 10th day of March , 1981 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this 1bt1` day of kN c a-c_L , 19 51.1 0J/ • Qh), Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Y.,p,, 611 Application, Petition or Case: Henry Daubert; R-009-81 (The m%nute4 contain a t,&st o6 the pcv .Lem o4 necokd. ) • REST March 10, 1581— Acc\ OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER q'U 1� Z981.,. �! CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLI CANT:'4"" ,s Henry Daubert FILE NO. R-009-81 LOCATION: Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to B-1 for potential use as a remodeled office. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Denial PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on February 18, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report , examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 24, 1981 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor' s Map Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map Mr. Blaylock advised that the area south of the subject site is in a transitional stage with a recent increase in land use intensity. The Examiner requested clarification of the planning practices pertaining to "back-onto" or "side-to-rear" configurations denoted in Section L. 1 of the Planning Department report. Mr. Blaylock explained the policy which is utilized to minimize impact from commercial developments to single family residential uses. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was : Henry Daubert 645 Shattuck Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 The Examiner inquired if the applicant concurred in recommendations contained in the staff report . Mr. Daubert indicated that the property will be sold and remodeling will be accomplished by the developer. Mr. Blaylock advised the concern of the Planning Department that improvement to S. 7th Street be required as a condition of approval of the rezone, and suggested that restrictive covenants be imposed to provide assurance to the city. He also noted that an environmental review would not be required for the remodeling project, thereby eliminating the possibility of imposition of landscape buffer or fencing provisions to protect the single family residential use to the north. The Examiner inquired if a recommendation of denial should have been made by the department. Mr. Blaylock felt that the rezone was appropriate in view of the recent transition of uses in the area, but concern regarding the actual configuration of the remodeled building may be mitigated through a requirement of site plan approval by the Examiner. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the distance between the subject site and the adjacent residence to the north, Mr. Blaylock advised that an 11-foot width exists which is insufficient to create a landscape buffer; however , an architectural fence could be discussed during site plan approval . • R-009-81 Page Two The Examiner requested further comments in support or opposition to the application. Since there was no response, the hearing regarding File No. R-009-81 was closed by the Examiner at 9:47 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a reclassification of approximately 4,800 square feet from G (General ; Single Family Residential ; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) to B-1 (Business/Commercial) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject site is located at the northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue S. and S. 7th Street. The site is level and is currently occupied by a single family residence and detached garage. 7. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of business and commercial uses. The area south of the subject site is designated for light industrial uses. 8. The subject site is at the extreme south and west end of an extensive R-4 (High Density Multifamily Residential ) zone south and east of the Central Business District. The site is one of three parcels zoned G and is bounded on the west by B-i zoning fronting along Rainier Avenue S. Property south of the site across S. 7th Street is zoned L-l . 9. The area in which the subject property is located is still predominantly single family residential . The eastern block front along Shattuck Avenue S. facing the subject site is almost exclusively single family. North of the subject site is a low density multifamily unit. South of the site across S. 7th Street is an auto wrecking yard. Immediately north of the site is a single family home. Directly across Shattuck Avenue S. are single family homes. The Metro Park and Ride Lot is also south of the site. A powerline corridor is just west of the site separating the subject property from development along Rainier Avenue S. 10. The north side yard between the subject site and the abutting single family residence is about 5.5 feet. 11 . The record discloses that two rezones in the area, the Christopherson (R-644-70) rezone and the Rhienhard (R-649-70) rezone both occurred more than ten years ago. 12. The Planning Department indicated that creation of a buffer between the subject property and the residential use to the north would be difficult due to the size and location of the existing residence. 13. The Burnett Linear Park is located about three blocks to the east of the subject site. 14. The Hull rezone (R-394-79) request for property located at S. 4th Street and Burnett Avenue S. was denied. The applicant had requested a reclassification from R-3 to R-4. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010 which provides in part that: R-009-81 Page Three a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the requested reclassification is in the public interest, is a good example of land use planning, and will not adversely affect neighboring properties. 2. The Comprehensive Plan map element should not be read alone and cannot be used without reference to the various goals and policies. Residential districts should be protected from blighting influences and property values should be protected through effective control of land use. Reclassifying the subject site to B-1 is not effective control of land use (Page 17, Land Use Report, Comprehensive Plan) . 3. As the record indicates, good planning practice would use naturally occurring or man made buffers as a first choice in separating incompatible zones from one another. Page 4 of the Renton. Urban Report states that man made dividers should be used to form boundaries of neighborhood units to achieve at least an approximation of the ideal . Extending the commercial zoning to this corner lot at this junction is not good land use planning and does not make effective use of the man made divider that S. 7th Street serves as in this location. 4. The site leaves very little room in which to provide an adequate buffer between the proposed B-1 zone and commercial use and the existing single family home abutting to the north. N.E. 7th Street, an existing road, makes a more dramatic natural buffer in which to delineate a transition zone between the more intense uses to the south and the residential area surrounding the subject site. 5. While the area was seen to be in transition, the transition has been quite slow and with the development of the new Burnett Linear Park, the area has actually maintained and strengthened its residential character. Shopping districts are located relatively close to the site. Both Renton Village and Renton Center are within a couple of blocks and serve as positive amenities for residential living. 6. The reclassification of the subject property to B-1 would create a non-conforming use. The current residence is located within six feet of the residential property to the north while the B-1 zone requires a minimum yard of 10 feet in this location (Section 4-711 (D)) . The conversion of the existing residence to commercial purposes therefore should not be permitted under any circumstances. The current R-4 zoning of the subject site provides a reasonable classification of the subject site and permits reasonable use, and it would be inappropriate to reclassify the property to B-1 . Classification to B-1 would intrude into the residential nature of the block and create a non-conforming yard which would be difficult to utilize for buffering purposes. Commercial use would infringe on the quiet enjoyment of the residential properties to the north and east. 7. As precedent, the Hull rezone attempt was denied. In that case, the applicant requested a reclassification to R-4 of an existing R-3 (Medium Density Multifamily) parcel . The Hull property was located just south of the business district on S. 4th and Burnett Avenue S. The request was denied because the requested classification was considered too intense a use in an area which was still primarily single family. The current request would convert an existing single family lot and use into a commercial use and this again is too an intense a use of the subject site, a 4,800 square foot lot, and should be denied. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should deny the reclassification of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 10th day of March, 1981 . 1 Fred J. fman Land Use earing xaminer R-uu -81 Page Four TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of March, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Henry Daubert, 645 Shattuck Avenue S. , Renton, WA 98055 Mary Pat Ryan, 15 S. Grady Way, Suite 134, Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of March, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. .Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Wa,rren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 24, 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. V . 9'...1. c�_l 3a lilt ✓� 1 \ -__ • ,1•r. '``YgJ 7II�i • _` • �+•: F.---''klz•••• •• :qi(Yr--5-:, •�"'•r► yy' dI B� S Q j \ 7 i 1 .z_. - f a, .f .... t _ 'I-- {{_77"jt7--jp-.' 55."t -'� r' i{ •3 . . N.Y✓ �(\ ,•p"� {�µ-i1+• 1� l{�.L y� .t 4'r N -f• {, •J, 1 • �r 1 \\* !(.2 �. 'itR} Q r w1 y' Q1 imiY t)'9� t{S "l , t -j a 1 {•, 4isi i x• • tl h W t_ 1> II • Li tj '41. • } • £ y{f7;t 53 I Z I ^_. _ / \_'•`‘ `+ , tr •f,Q JJ'.�0""l7,,,, I. a -1 ) •L: ;t ?� (+:li Y, .. • .N�IY•, IZ'.�i++.,,++yJJ..k„,„ a l — \�� , l7,�♦ , y t•' '(] 7 ., _, r '1�.•._$-r rt+ I.1 El f 4a 4+ •Y •. ...... r �1> :N..'N ...... tis I l, • i i- •� ..Sti'C(� �, 7g tw j, t .I..1./L•'1FZ 1. • I .-. -_J 'ALE! �� r+ 1 sa.1'v_ILs?r3I, s E- • ®0 9 '.1=i Im .: 1.a'� }I #,.. 41 '�1,,,,•• \,ti�• • ''';'1; •Wa• 17 . .._J • T I,1•i 1. t. Irt rnsur err •1,• •, `Ir.'. I , '...:.1: S + f�AZSN t. t, o•I••, •. .�, i ,� •° � • a I -•-••�,ti,,t t`�' l � ''G y'',P``,', _�.__ak7��' .�� ,a 1+. • J „.-. + wa Ir..,:,t '✓.� "' r • Ira •� �� .ir If eJ,r.fr ( At , r.J •� I • V•�1 fd • 67 •niN l'l 'G� r"c, N. �ygyry ti"'b. ` 1 ,h-•..w,w« I 1 t r ` ,V.• +�I ! IA c -- T44 C ;4_: !S ` ♦,'"r ,i, 1.ierary •;/ u. • Al �— >' , JIIer. I 117 i: �G' iij L 04 -1`., - ti7:, p RK'� t 4, • ,,,..r rn 474' • .•: 1 d' oCf D - �.:w p •'?••, •! -~ c'• -1. / `% 9 m tAA�� 3ev,ca 'RyH+ai 1....,. 1� • i�a�� I. ... ��• ram"` ` �j -•-- '' f `�• - . 1 5 r.b` st,'1- t� t - 3 it'214 [-..ii,;."1.: ;•t t. �N, �. `1 .W 4r `41s�-';`•".` C1 T .. "*1- _ �. ' • L.0 4 . -;;II N _i ',at471 ; • l /•§ ~ •.M;V •I . yL� t, t.. u 1 ;1Al.: 1 F r ((� ; `i: ,di4�,/ I---%. i fo ti 1 •T'sA J� -i ,` :1 �+ ^ •i• rT.. 1 ,,I„111t ✓ •,t l _ 1:111 7 • - r'ri, 'i -6 1 •tL L• J p r. a.�<• fd m i t_u' y _t. '•) p u,C cut 1) y - w .� /'��-. - • 'ti , q� �-�, • m °��a�I��,s 1- w I,''-; � ��.� �,f<�`•�.n1 (�::gyp: • J;�%/ad' �``'''y' "��"o„�� zwa ti •"C+ .n,.J ,..L.L.ho lrl.hi , t, ,. i : W hL _, �• `'ti.i • 0. 6 'a.4' `t - , �`�., rf lymy LT fiI.� �IlWn;. r ¢...r / 'a a-L 1•i• a— r,}Iw,r, -`7P}C' "i�tl1-. 11 IW"l L—i"-'•1 ,* .1 1 i.J�'" s t t + tfyL•r , ' L. �' i I ¢ui tui1 rt t yI1 § `11 - ✓ i r _-1 �'1 i NI. 1741 o r, .�,p A) r 1 i u ,_.��, ti.._b 4 �' P 1~., F' ►i I L'• ,s- r ''�I�i K• -P•i III . ' •• t+ 1 ,, ,) �+ '!{�' , or %, S '<'.r�,7 .� 'fill [--f...t 1��.'-4 y Wit_,— O r` • $r F \I jai �' J 1 J�l`nt+d? .t 1. .ts •,4I En• a. i t • _ •s i s Y J ..„........3,s\\ + a � ,Y� V V _g t to •1. t ? t , 1- �� .._ 9 I ' p • D® - - ~ 'Y' >. A� � " `''i • - (• 1i.,.• :• III 1 ' t .�Y'.• : (A(�y pp } t� 1 it 1 1 . -!., i• , , ( .1.; - • - , 4,-, v•,,, . . r= t=i LvlE1 }' f i I, •_1 * �4- ` 7F 1 - t- to u. , "I:7i 7 [4 r-Trri s i a •la r >�� r / I -7i Ecr f . � ' I - w / ,I '.1.5l -t1tI pJ t..14i n'.d - Gti� Lrl ` _ • ,. I ', HENRY DAUBERT ; . R-009-81 I ,.,-•'''s.•...•.•�..—..-.ccrac .tmcros. < I , APPLICANT HENRY DAUBERT TOTAL AREA ±4 , 800 sq. ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Shattuck Avenue South EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District EXISTING USE Single Family Residential PROPOSED USE Remodeled Office i. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial COMMENTS i .._ .- - .. .. , ...--- .. _ ..- .tea • . .. ,.. •... •.(`fn„.:...c:,..s',..1;rry,,..,,.)1..V1.r,e .o,-,-...1..*-.,,,•4-.1:•;,:..4i•i,,„2....r.:.•.,.i.1.t.,,c 71,,.-,E-;1/4.,i.WA.,r-ii.•;5oeb.•.x•-,1,•"•7‘1•,r.•'-:1i,,.-.•,-,..i,.........,.i.,4.•1.i.W,1.l7,..•1.,.),,,,•,'..,.,•,....•,;9 T,..i.L,,.,l:,5,'.,it„'i/';,.c;.•7..Sl.'7r.'N'-''0•r.'.q1''/.A,,...,'t.4.a./,Ts)I,,v'4)7 i itV./,1/4'1*,,':`•...', '„, •vt„0I•i,.-..>tj_1....g.,:,'•.,,,, :-.,,V,I•: .,.•. - 4.. /,..I,1 ,N,,..O',t•. ''• '"'.t1 i.‘:.' '''.--- 1•..T..••t1/4A;\:•°-•..,4 4',-1t\y 4•."%1;--,1-..•": ,..,„.'.-....,.7:...„‘,..\.',a.•-‘,., n S*v (l10 (. „ - S c 4 r S • '11 /• t ... , . . , .. _1.17;:; •• r.i.,,j'i 1. .,t.).,t 2...,,,,„.t, _, ,..,, 4.) ; V ..•:•;(,; i ' ' itr!i. I..,i /4',cirdo — 4...- Lt ) • • • p ti 1,,, 1.1i w ti .4 > , I"- 1•••'" le ' -...f$. 9.. • „ic z.,.!.,-... _, ,‘„,.L.......... ... - ,..i. ____.y..„ ..,:„:„,.. ,,,,,......,,,,,,,......_......„,..._ .... ....-azo,--.—..IX.,,:ikl,ta 4,'Isc.v.X.J.1.•,1.4erori?..f.Te.:14't".'St."..•"4.0.1.41.V.7.P'rStrt41 ' .0'.;SkiA;e'io...,.. II t •ty /. . . . .......„,4? 74...,!. ! iry.7."''''....,,,. "*"' ''''''''''''''r"•"•••""""`" r".""••• u•;0••••••••••,-.....,..-.titrorttrrttroraar . -Icla.ros.v.ro.; 1,-il.;........1-sf Kr '4 iei•:',..) I '. '',. 14 1' .•• •' •'; 1 •'. "1:,,, :VA . • .• o .. -,V, ' 4:47.'..4. 'o' • , 1.0°' ' `:1,::!, ,/ . . czi,, .,- ,q,-, .,.,3„,1:1,9.7.,,,,,P..),I„.:-..).P.,• =3 .) < . ,•.„„ ‹ • r, " •:,„ , ,..,,„,.. - ST. Ii Rol ;...it ' • ,...4 r• e`--„,'..-t.• .,..07,4`c,;;,,,,4 iAlli‘ N I I-1 r)N''' ....'-<',2 —4 T H `.'1'.,i- 1 ...,,r,,,,t,...%•!.,7' ,„.I,,,,,i\til r• I .c'r'-':',109' i;-•:.4, .•l',141i1 R I N r 0 N 0-.4°.'f' A — -LA rt,' ,..:.i —.”;1,!;ill'il:',',1:-,,,-.4nr.AL" ,..,_,..„fot 0..1-.'v.);.%11-----.%)\4.441.Ctil S zi_TI-1.,i. . ,. •0\'',.7'.-Ir'l. *.• ',.'s.4, b C.,,--,‘...1 lid i• r ",7,1 .1,-1 <1•,'.ut,...,- ----::.V. , 1,y. . •ifla..,- ;'!1-===, - .,----i- ; 4..,,,,..•.. .,,,,,,,/, •r,---k . , ..., , 13 . .i 1 ,111 .1 Le ',,.1,- f .it--,•°— .14 .,,''''' .f. ' ) 65'1;44 .•''' '',/ Silk)P1 I Ni(.1 1'7 c . . • •a C 1.... ir....,1 j !4:1' f;,/ic•> 1,1.:),,,/, :.. ..t.• „el i 4'.1 •-• . tc • -14 ,.-•-.•-•' • _ „„,-."i2 -' i '' N.7,:r .,.,;0••'' 1:-i..........6...).• vitt-Li.1:4- 1 R 7.. 0 I' ..;$''' I• . , - b %,:. pt. .• ,- to..:-.-44,,)-.4k.--,1 • 64z,,k1 • • .ise,\A I ', , -- Vri..,LL ;2‘• • • ....•,,•.4 .,.. ,,„, • -v-.-. ,,,-•. --, • .... , ,,,,„/,, ,„,), k. b. IL...4,n IV.71,,iit.1.1.7. 1atig.011.14.44,...1:4411&'''' A ''' .r.t., :•''.=.;.:1::±:.'p!. : 11 1...\// • s A„‘„0„, .,„•,e i..);„,,, ,1,• ,• • ...1,....:Cel'.e4"H" t.i 15Tiii i (1-.) S ri) v•i" • . rov.',44 1,T-1v- ',-,4•,; .1 • .1 ,....j,k1 .j........,', 29"- ,Lartam‘r ,'•7,1=gs.,.•szwi.ta= , Vx4ilt, ..';" 4' --...",- 4...,"i0t• t:e•'''' ''... ..a .-- jiU.,1 0 Peq.1i1,1, ‘•• ",/,•azzO r;.,,j':: • ,- . LO ' ..4. •i:- 5• cl: W I) I , ‘17, _..; „em,,,,,, 4" ....1 (X;(7 .• 67)1 F;;,;-1 '4.1.%I N ' -A..• 'i - '7/r- ,,L. .,,,, •:-: CS —J zt ,,,.:,,,,',..p..).-i , .,., ,erir7.?4`0:‘... ...1' ,..ii,c..'...1,' -" • 45,4 r "L" -' f;/ 1. . • .',.,1 re,111.i.•.4 ,,,4,,,i Ail •-•r*--a-rilla.i',*•z,,','Ik.:1,k! . \ 1 k: i " 4 - ."4 IA ',-;T J i —1 , •*rilil ".,-.4‘,..).41,-,LyNt,•.,..,, -0. 3: 49:/;••'1.'", i'l,,Tsr,r4;:mk,,A:....v-.777:77'1! '....1..•:•:,'.••••,•,. " •k.r.,„,i,:‘,4,fey. c..,...,1,, , ,-,- ,.,..,•:!1•14..,,,•,..,:,,..,:,,.,,,.,,,,,.,..,..,_•,•„,•,„ . k,,?..y...c.;:!•,,,l, ,..,): c ..., ,. ..-c. 1 i 0 ' ,,-) i ,,,.,,1: 1;7'.,.('-'• . i ••;:.E.,,-.v.I.i.,.,:,,,,..ks,.-44,t;,,......., v..• N,i;5'i•!,:4?:•,1,,,i, cc • Arc;:- "/P `p • - 'I, • — '''''y:;;0 - co u7 1 17' CILI:'" 1 , \s fl,mu, • t, kr1,• . \,'•'',',4;,f.',I1717,1t Y7.-;i1.7Ri 0711.!3.W.-4 T'..,Vit:,';.i. (..,T,1,7:4? iii:773177.:, „ i vi:,,,..;),:h. ,,,,,,',.,,,,. :..',i';',i' .0;:t.',\ t",•,,,.4!.•;,.,A np•46.;;:lim, .,o'Z'' .gl. • •-•k::',ii'..4. '.'.'A4!. .t..L. i."6-•, .:j.-,•1.; ••••:,,i:,,... 44 s„,..................-„...,..........,...................,......,....-.. ,,,,;;;44,...%-,,,.,.....:,,,,,,.,„.,. ...,,,,...,77- .........• ,.:,.„4....p.-•A•4.• is ri.,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,iok i! . . „ oN 4• .,..;j.. ._ ,.. •• ,, t'."!..91.7"''':-+I" ,-,VI .. 7.'''"'' .'.. 7"'" • • . . i• , , k , i. ...,..r ..;! i •ii,. .,', • 4 , ' . IC:P44' ;"1• •, I il , i.: Y 1..,.'k; t• ; ,,i; , . .., , • ,. . . ./ . i f• . I' ; , i ,,,..o i.,. • pa4 ; , i 1 ' *1 '''' . t . . ,,, ' . . . • ' .. 1.•• I.•;:•, ••4.\•,,! ,, .. „‘: 2 -71;e:117.•,. ="- ., ;1, , . , . ,, , , .. • 1 . 0,..,\;41i....i. •,, /11 itisp . • I •• ik .'• , 1 ., , • ". , ,k , ., • •11;01 • , ', ,,,,,4,1, rki5-11'. , c,,,1 , „so. .. A f'; ; „. ' • r • . "; ,-; , • . ;. 5 ..,,,,,,„ • so i• I ..,..P• 1 U ..'. .,, I/ :; ;I hi" '. 11 . • J41/24.11'1,? cjic..: . • ,)4.;31MV".LA"'' ' • i , n l.,J•o,.....td•A' ot r klz, i 4 V.I. . 4 I•: g • R f N T t)IN V ILI, i•li.;t...'• i• J., r d!,-,,,•r,i• •sj.''' • !•!•:••• t • ' ' 70; 5H.OPili NC (, F 1\ / 171. 111...T • . , tr:,.. , ,,,1:• v• . • .44.k1S. .. ,st.'-''''-°"'-'. •PI, A i i ' . " ' 7.'''•'',1 •"Altarlityl•.. /'. ' .• ••• -'-'1 ii ':"h'. • ', ; ';''-'-''''''' '. 3,,4- -1, 1 • L , 4, rz,,,,,,, , • • R ENT , VILLAGE I ;,,,,, • • . , . • • .,.. .:0, •,„„...?,) .....„...„ . „,„..,...,,,.,„.„...„...,....„..„,,,,.„.„ . c,. _. cz• Il'i..,II•i*. ' ' . u --co* ,,et f;. i.:.A 4 :::-": •4 ,,„ ,,,,.• .. , . . ' . ,• •'.' pp!:',,,..,!•,,:•;,''.1•• ,t ' , .., ,•ittOpli''' •'' .%*". . • . ,4,f•,..1 rf,'11,,,' k , ..,.. ..1••••- w . ,,,.....- . , • •• I.',y ic: ;•.".'•,...:4 ,ii r i A-0.'St:- ','.P`' • ''',..-c=rA,.0::.,,, ifilt,111 0)0,:ar,•„,:. ,,,,.", > •.,. ;\ ':;:r; ',, .", ,;r;'•!•' i;-e,:.1.Q,,,,,,,t• t J.*51 :. . 'lit d'e•P- ..,•f .1,.... < ..1_,,,,,,-,:vi•-•:•--°,/.72- •cf.,..4..•/ .\ .., ,, . •,le• i. •. ., ..:,,, , . 4.44),Ico,4-3,,,p,-- , . Pi•-:•?• .,,t.,, ': .., %,0 ,-- Pig ‘ •r•',,. k, t... .1%,.AP.,,0.1. i . •,,,,---",.' • .liki,-y . ,y•r511-,1k.,17,c,liP1117414,-.,k;W.Or,,,Iii..*ANC ilirt..!S-,;?„ ,,el,:.1.--. " 0 . ,-, „tst" S )''''' 'V 1'''Y''''':1 V'''!•t4;i'Alit/kl'ql„'..V•:•!rt*Iti*41,'.g:t1;,,41•Alt,'n44'1.'\"4,,,::iirst i.,/- , (.1) _ ---, 1.7.‘")'::L.-'-ln:172=.' -.'''.....::::u.?!7!;,'J t'll•'.'Eri??C',1:111i'd.:elliallZiP.l'N'''''. -1:,.:-tagn3- ''' e x ii - 0 Cr a) t A I Vt (r) —1 ' r.,... ...1 '' C:..a..i.z....z.s.... .', ''• • S 1 t,.. c..' -\ (1,?,' .' ., 1:.L., ) • ,S trA (1) LLJ 0 \\•••,11 -,,,,,,..... , s 15 r H • 2 1, ' : ").---I/ ',.m.-ranzw•-,.=tsrre-- ....aauz=outt..7.•.:',,,,, .71e2.41:z•-t••..vo..t...le..r.-.••=orr.==serno 2 , . 0 ..1 -..-41........amva,.....= -rx.-ZZ4-• "\,,,, ; 4, / • a .... . . S...4, .' .:4 - A . - , • EX L5-6....,NJ cr. 1A.01-_,..... J____] 3e , A —AG--RICA LliiRE, L-1 — Li C.;-1--1-1 i qPii5fR\l' 5F-... N —LL. EA MI y ..... i ILA 1 -- !---1AV ---- 1L-13-1:K_ ( ,..., p- Low F/1.-°,-- .15i-i_Ne: 1\441 IV. NA P—MAtiLlEA-.11,1RIN...1f..77- frAi- ,_,'1,< C., - C.OMN/11, ,F, C.IfcL, .„-...-/c.-,,,...ri\r-_-,) 14,c--)//irz ti ......' g,......) -...1 ../ i . ,• / 7 1 pi 1 r-,, r ,/(--)1 9 A c.i I ritr- i. f r PREii,n M I\I; 1' REPORT TO 1HE HEARING 1*r m l" 1Nli R PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 APPLICANT: HENRY DAUBERT FILE NUMBER: R-009-81 A. SAY s PURPOSE OF R'I:*HEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to B-1 for potential use as a remodeled office. B. GENERAL IF'®;arI ATIO: 1 . Owner of Record: HENRY DAUBERT 2. Applicant : HENRY DAUBERT 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property: +4 ,800 square feet 6. Access : Via Shattuck Avenue South 7. Existing Zoning : G, General Classification District 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : G, R-4, Residence Multiple Family, minimum lot size 5,000 square feet; B-1 , Business Use; L-1 , Light Industrial 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial 10. Notification: The, applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on February 8, 1981 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on February 6, 1981 . C. ffiIv` I/ TER: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1322 of September 21 , 1948, at which time the present zoning classification was applied, r 41 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: Henry Daubert, R-009-81 FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 • PAGE TWO D. IP 41,YSIICAL ACKO'e aPUN®: 1 . Topography: The site is relatively level. 2. Soils : Urban land (Ur) is soil that has been modified by disturbance of the natural layers with additions of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial and housing installations. The erosion hazard is slight to moderate. 3. Vegetation: The subject site consists principally of lawn grass with a few shrubs. 4 . Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals. 1 5. Water: No surface water was observed, on the subject site (February 6, 1981 ) . 6. Land Use: An existing single family dwelling is located on the subject site. Similar .structures are to the north and east. To the south is an auto wrecking yard and to the west are various commercial uses. E. NEIIk ru,:,S to:®OD CHARA RISTICS: The area is primarily low-density mulitple family with scattered light commercial. • F. IPA zLIIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 16" water main runs north-south on Shattuck Avenue adjacent to the subject site with 8" water mains located on South 6th Street and Shattuck. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Planning Department as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates on South Third Street approximately a mile to the . north of subject site while Route #155 operates along Rainier Avenue South within z mile to the west. 4. Schools : The Talbot Hill Elementary School is approximately 11/2 miles south of the subject site while the Nelsen Junior High School is about 11/2 miles southeast and the Renton Senior High School is within i mile to the norther • 50 Recreation: The Cedar River Park, Liberty Park and Jones Park are all within 1 mile to the northeast of the site. G. 4,1•PLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING C*DE: 1 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District. 2. Section 4-709B, R-4 , Residence Multiple Family H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ]HAN nR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY 1 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Land Use Report, 1965 , Objective #6 , Page 18. . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: Henry Daubert, R-009-81 FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 PAGE THREE I. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL Ot" XUMAN E11 IIImtm wiraNT: 1. Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not directly impact the vicinity. Development and/or modification will, however, disturb the soils, remove the vegetation, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. However, through proper develop- ment controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated. • • 2. Population/Employment: Minor. 3. Schools: Minor. 4 . Social: Minor. 5. Traffic : Minor. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASS SSMERT/Tll r S:OLD DETERMINATION: Puruant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a., declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the ERC on February 2 , 1981. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: : 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Department. L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 'ANALYSIS: 1. The proposed rezone is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of commercial for the subject site and surrounding area. However, good planning practice would normally • suggest that a change in land use classification should either be a "back-onto" or "side-to-rear" configuration. 2. Rezoning to B-1 would be generally compatible with the existing zoning on parcels to the west (B-1) and south (L-1) . Previous B-1 rezones to the west and north include Christopherson (R-644-70) and Anderson and Rhienhard (R-649-70) . The existing "G" zoned property to the north could possibly be buffered and those properties to the east should not be adversely impacted by such a rezone. 3. If approved, the applicant proposes to remodel • the existing dwelling and use it as office space for a commercial venture. This structure would then have to meet City Building and Fire Codes for occupancy and use. 4. The proposal to create an office or small retail use of this site will partially serve as a transition from more intensive uses allowable in the L-1 zone to the south. Remodeling of the site to allow more intensive commercial activity would appear to adversely effect the residential uses to the north and east. Therefore, the structural space I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: Henry Daubert, R-009-81 FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 PAGE FOUR • allowable on this property should not be allowed to exceed the current dwelling unit floor area. Demolition of the garage to meet the necessary parking requirements for a business use is likely. 5. The Engineering Division and Police Department , advise that the applicant will have to agree to participate in a future LID for improvements to S. 7th Street. • 6. The Public Works Department proposes to widen S. 7th Street from Rainier Avenue easterly past Shattuck Avenue South. As a condition of this rezone, this widening should include curb, gutter, sidewalk as well as other typical public street appurtenances. M. DEPARTMENTAL CO N tATTJO1S: Based upon the above analysis, recommend approval of the rezone request subject to satisfaction 'of items L-3, L-4 and L-6. • ' I ,1,4,z_•;ki,,Atti f 40 39' i ,e44. \,....(:)4.,2 .. ‘1, -lit -. 'ti 3. -;•;f1-1;:;- - It" 1,1 4 .-- i ---A : i '-'' -I ,i I_ _ ,..A-4, _S 1.37 r a •7 N _ ,i \ 'Q • jY'°7 �..-_�W ti' .i !`dIF°. '. BELL �i .�. I } „ef \- �� .�� ^ 'per t it �Q d." � 'r ..�.� �t 4 s °"' r \ \yf / 111 .'I' frk( r 'i,V ": (�t c;T -Y !{ A i .f'"" •�L.'1�!`r ,. �• '. -r.'�.1 s}� �CQI,1j� i d \ \ - c,. 4t....0• • t� is . D•:•G' ] Z ! I �\ i a ,4 !- ��nLL�...]])oil 'x��py.gob 7f Mk • .1 i s --W' T . ¢ " L —�-_ 4 ? 6 u k �'TE }I� 'ems Z u_ r , i Q 1. \ f', N t .1� A4r^,N ii4. it 4 f,t ' LAI' it -, „,,,.. ='`.:,,,, . `1,' - j.. I mVskti ''. ..,▪` -rt,-,,,,i,' -A-Yi. L93 V. r A f,-' a 1,T` LL = 3 .1 � ,Tr,n"., .. + '�.,,�'a.'i. , , ,f.- , _•, i ,f 4 ky :'. . • i, ill R , ___ (l�`:t �" _ i�'�'}, «a w aToolN a -1 ,• o�V� � ii{ 'psl'' 1T` Ogl, , IN ,•' i —*Pi I.4, 'T41 r -.'-'#'1 '1, 1 I G fit E r tv''''':''''' ''4'" Al ,- ..I'k. 4- '',,)°.' ' • 1 - 1.,,,...: m / _, 1-r-2i i '44,,. „..: , 4 t L/BER,TY 4: I Y'�� 1 r.....�I? i, CA Fes' 1 a; .:FAX. 51', '' .�,�+C p„.. �i M1, . -. • S t�r : R a.a9 a i l _ TyY..y: Y //� 1-, ' ' 1 9rroros .iMror :ttifi1 - += ' i r' y 4 •1.114.1 -�'PY• - ,?-•„".� 5C 41ML 9CIiQ:Lo. ' •. L 5 � "•w 3 ero 4 • - C� T r y`,s • c" x w i ' � t i f�tw dor 1 i 1 `µ y° $ 11 c.�h 4,....r.' - • -i 1• _ r�[7`:n ar . Alit r",.kr iki r siT• R � <�•. / // _I�i . .4 _,, . - ,- .,..,0. ...._,__,..______ , ,....„. .,T,,,,,,, -, , ,0- . ,...,,,- 1 , ,.,-, 74, r-s ________- '----- . ii, ,,,, , •a,, . .a, - 7, '1 r01-1 7i9 r ,Fr°}.1� 4o n _ " ! may,. • � /� ^^ 1 ©+"m sit L rn -+� \ "i y. -1 $ } .--tr , 1; f- 1 _ g ° i ''{�i 1 n F -a r "` P\�v 4-" , ('' w c " 7 i,ra._ ,..-7 jiff - - ‘\4 z, ! Bl illti i7 P ' elk r �r I [i ` ' '" ui- t u�{,` 11,,?1 a- ) T , s` r? ` ' E a� f` 8!�Jt .'' ) a y t- (`,, f l rl—1 j °)�..:. ;I g = ' . ', , -1 YI•w.r �� •E S' r e � ',84 I.Tyr"tr `' , r .A -�j� �T 4 4 b � ,� k ; ' k� li ( '- Yo, . f e fi � t "! I • e ` � � N ^ 4�- pa it ipi p 6 R $$ J4r • pi� ..- .i - Y r o i 9 ,T 1 �--i "•• r-r818. - � _cT:' ca E� ___- _ -y- 'rt. C� 1 -mot` _ /, \ ii • ''.'. 1:12:---, 1.;_:07-i,_, I_ _ . L, ti__ _ , ___ _4•1;;;-. i ''''''_,:.i r, y ,.-3 I r tt t,-1 •-•'-'- . ,t 0 I 44.47:1,10 _, -' ' t LCO _ f�f� 4 I• 5 t I t1 I L5 '11 < M i i , r HENRY DAUBERT f R-009-81 APPLICANT HENRY DAUBERT TOTAL AREA ±4 , 800 sq. ft. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Shattuck Avenue South EXISTING ZONING G, General Classification District E EXISTING USE Single Family Residential PROPOSED USE Remodeled Office COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial COMMENTS L' cll. -- 11r1 ' 1 1 II ' • -1 !--•,:. T1 _Jr 1 j..... Lii.., , li...... _ ,„,a. ,,,,,,, .:... ,. .._ _ _. ..., .._, L---- . I L _____....._ _...1 1 i 1 [7T77FT) (7-7 .7c..1 —I- 1 - - - F-1— ,.,_,, .----- 111)10 Ei ; ( EI\ --4 7. ' [-___T1 D' - -71-__I\-; 1 1__.:3 x LI] i r kt•..at.wzon ....11..":2 ..=,...,, 1 taP,......-.."'''''"'"''''.. a..•• A !g [ 1 t,-..... 1 i a - J 4,1:-.4..... . .„-- .-......,". , _ —.- I I trti r 1 • (-] 11 Li \, El L._.1 i [-L.-7 - 1- --1 ',I .......... ...-ir ,// rf--- II- [---, ---r-rnj\---rn- ,, ,, __J F-- cT..11 Ell I' 1 ----- ' P -- , II ---1 — ] ,, I, [-A ' Li -1 I i fi E -_1 r I I i i _____ _I 11 IlL. 1 ri f.""1 i I L____ 1 1 r __I , 1 _____.__I- El: 1 1 L. , 28 r------- ic ?..P .,...",.....- x 29 4 f h \ 3k, .1\,E x 3 t - X / I F r--- i il.j_.. if!i n ri \ / -• i ,,,\:..........,,_ _,..-- ___.... ...-1 1r__,T , tili --:, . ., r [0 f El r-" 1 Li Li :" °- y, 1 I e p - Li E,;;Do Li] r} b r ) 0 ,, 0 ----r- ' 1 , .i.\\\ , 0 I A I ,--,, , 4 •0 I ---',;.----::-"....-1"--2,- ;,..: .,• 0 ID El , C= ,.' .--......:>fe, ; El 11 1 3,,(.........„. 1 -:,,,>-,...-:- 1-1 Oil r- 1 — 4.' ......„,- .....1....•:; ;.......ary5014 "tl, r il 1 -- ki ,, __ II 11 , 1 ..._,--„..........3„(-,i 312---.„.. , ;,4--- -L__\ . , i 1 ___---; - - -----..-,,,----- ...- cr-.7 _.. Li It_ L-211 ' .. . , _ t 29 5 t h AV E, ..-- , - •••• ''11 1 I [ - 1,- lb 1. [ i lig 1 p E: 1 I 0 41-1 1 ; 1 11 r--- ' -1 - -- -•1 E- ED p El °• E43 I II . D ri b r, 1 110 [-] ,1 -i L___., _ .,El r: I _ 0 C:341i5„ LI 1 it P 1 P 0 ,I ',.. ..c....- • k r ° .11c:J .,., ' E3 or f r 1-1 ' F2J 9 IF E5 c.4ar,1; ---Gri ,.,.2 , _-_,1 1 -1 .._"_. 10 ic,.. I !rot. 0-- 1, EJ 1 1 Ek_.... En.cc. i .,:, crii. .,fai:,,,,, al : : r .: 1_ ,,, . ,,,,,, C.D.___, .,.._. 0; (T)! ii3..- DI 1 0 ; Lir I I .............„--.,.d. , __ • I [._=_) 1 -- -.1 ‘ dig ! • 40- 11 E.-3 .„..... '''` . + E! 1 Li 7[7 , ,ti oh .._...r , 0 wi 0 = mg] , iir2;ri r 1 li MO.—) '. C2i7F rii 1,3 ' ____ .___ x ?4 X 2 4 6 f h X 2'1 AVE. . • " , .. . „, .• -1-1 1ir '--1 J , ' E_ i rE.1 0 :1 1 ID FitFi ...,..i ri 1 ,i-poen. . IA r p 1 Ir.„„..„„ j 6 ! i 42_I] i 1 El r----, , . L.-I N.. c,,,s, .. , ;1--?_ ,09 ., ._.3 ,.... . .... ... , 0 I, L___! , , t t i 1„ A 1 ; I— 17TJ. _ E-1 , r Lu ---.74. . il ri u - \ ! --" - -1 . #0 ,__—, 1 i] ; E l L___J li . 1 ni DITO 0 -3 0 fz3 - -•Pi • i Iii • -. ' fi" i 1 ' 14 0 li - - li- ` • . : 0 L-:i 1, _____Iiii_ as , ,i4.1 •/ 1 $ , • '''. A..e .il i ) ea r 1 F U Ej -- I ELI I 14/-, '1,71hVec,4 4;k1, 1 l ' .; , -1 RI ,__-_] . _i ID CI - ..,,..x - it', ,,uk,. Es-Romil , EvErni - 7), u \ v,•7.,,.F,J71 • vs EX 1 3-11... ....c--77, LA:\.,..11) -AG-Rialt)-(UR, Li - 1,_:&ilLiIIL,IPLI,51i2Y F 511,4G-1.., FAmLy HI - 1-1FAVY 1017 , rKr P- L,0 ' 551. i-ry mULI. kiir-mA (1_, LijrA- Rim&-. PARK 42- mp21 m mi\bi-ry m111,7( & - c_omIAL3scip,,I., 1 P-hilc--1-1 7R-PARK5,7F\ CiRriA 10 , / r'''S ....,• tr4.1 .?... ./.......% 1 . .... PI tr."9 2 I IP-41 i fl .o.• „,,:,..,-.71 ,,..-1.....-v-F1,. [ -\,r,,,•i•' /� &LJ k..' F1rCIiiDv p�IL.. I ,''''''. i'�A S K�.;�aY (\ {` d •''t -_."m' :y,wr f •n 'y N 61 :.s:73v' cy:� +' C' ur` j`;' .+:�v u' t �uj' , 1 s Eh F,61 "o,,,,a4`��: ,','"�•stas..�-s} „ .. sue+,•,-)$, :.•-._.i - •,z:�.*sai.1, (h ; Fes• �l Sy, na.., g..%� id { t h1,1 Eali fie. �:' q6 y] 'Y.;:I ! {�a tf 4 }, ti a. , ,.I: z^3 e Cwn S f, �d S T �C .`e '"_"'�. el y,tx'-u;`t'?it".�:a"Y:...�;'°}E�''CU ""=*;d:,rs .�anr” ,.--,. q®„ C7 . 1 ,I ', f F.^ * . 1;i::;11:.'mb' `� �yy 1 ,t. ttr•t ,•' t •1 A, G'.�c= ' 1 I {pt';, ':.r.',: y \••'•. .�' •.ems V•'e5^ d"''w i ` 'Y ee-'`- _ • L . . ,4''rik21 ,4'y .,. ✓ rP a,,'r. .::,.ifA 00 411 4`"°'a„y{- '.", r,t- r- , %, ,--1- —__..Skl'ttfIzit:S�,r•,':isa,..z a a;1.i a a 1/45 t ea'.aF7011.:. j•••01 e{+ i' rg,, cl ;iiq, .�-t, 'y�,1 Ah�3. Vc;o w �y ..,a.wn. �assnasa..>'„'.'.a+.a:n.=:ar:a Ty'rua..:rsxn rr P:19 1 L'°'l 1 —:::4'94-I 1C:4' �FdP....0,,,,17 4 , ��,, • /•. \,„,,,,. , ; ,ic ' ' -.ti, ut* / ;'SHOPINC '- ii r e,.. ,t, •, i1 .> , :•i .�. mac- -.mar=fit'. ` CENTER �� ,. �, X. ggyy .. 111 '�� 17,E - ,I �q .aL.,:�c^ `., •'' ;.$' Y'r ,, 7.I...L:1,,., , ck r"` ' b ai , a• t '°J,DPA ( j $\ >x�y9'3y;," :s'Cs,.�'.,,.ii;•.r..i��•�-,.�� ,...! .��y .•.',ie*• •r.,r.� ,•:,_ Iy • r, :: ." ,,. „ ,.:, S 511.111 al ST f Ii 0.,?,, ' + < !tJ 0 z , .... , _ ,, W v' :, i42 .,,'ill S b T Fl S T --' n � ` `'•.:arY.k,.efM,,-Li 1 4 77 .r + f- •, .,, y.•ru:csszeufl�yi:.a: xa - • o tp'.'.�• t . �.. `1 t � i ^' ' � # Mq,''� r r r \ : te A„•, a � K _� • ct tv f,, � fin f • rr 'i ;. 1° ; e{c - t Z , .- . .,C1 . .0 i • .4 . .4 ry.. J . K • punc...=2=-'^ c3rc= ===1 w.mwrr.1�,-,�Z eitti g a .t..k. A, .0, ,,, Iv Au . r,,x. #::a.,,, •- a , , , ,• 3 r, P r ' ,I y, 44. 1 I Q^q t° %;Y r �i • ' :'.••:'•,-, -,,<•-••,,e,,. ' .. ' i • • t ..A . ..4. •.,, •-if k y^d14 s. y tF, t'" ,ky... +m • ,',fir • (''+`1 r '.' may,, 1� 4 :' i 1 ✓ -3 1.J 1 r .` k��'� • :;;. t t ] "{ j [ i � d VILLAGE �156 (ff .� G �� R'.` ::4sYv.:SC;A :i�7'�0 tA" , , �r J , ..�. 't�'C• } V Aa ' 7'� .. "- At''',( ''',., •_ c, ��m 7. S 15TH t` ‹JL / ST .. ; , T o 'i 6 _ EL1N L& k2 LJ3E A RI �` Li - Li "i i 171 5fRY: 5 r- 5I I c,--LE. FAM Ly HI - H A\/S I Kt U T -i 1 L p.- Ltd\V K13I°'Y mU Lr� , 1 MA[[L1. A; (- P E< 2- WIUM MM N C r51 C - C M N71 - ,cip.si� 17 JJG4-1 1:7°� .:5IT(Y 1)7 • .-=,/t3t-F7A,R14")5/RE-CAP,AfICTIT "1, b..r", .^"11 1 f .i /.... t 1 .a rw a r-na 1 v"t,B I s. lirlitll Pl anni n. .. T2-1979 • RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET lep— Application : ® e. ',1) _ c3e ._A_ "6"39 A-1 ioilk-logigyff we dvs 62,15 ' eac; IP In , . sAitortz Location : • , Ificoinwr ore gig r eAereS„ q9 ;--r Applicant : TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ��to , Police Department AIRS C. ,'MEETING DATE : 142 / '' _ Public Works Department E. Atli( e If o •� Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Bi i'l}ding Division f'Utilities Engineering , et Fire Department • (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION 'SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT G FO T E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC),, TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD, FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y UR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEAS PROVDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,q Approved v ' Approved with Conditions Not Approved LQa/e&1) /c'r-C -% ("e i/ /`"7/eC l'>oe__-S / /Ii.:_____ _, , , >-4--- 4. ,),- (- ' / : --2/k Si nature of Director or thorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : / Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ,tom^ ,✓��? _ ��; )/�3�(�t Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . r9, P1anni � 12-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : 3'D PE ii'! �� N) 0 ° 64 er 0 ,,. Veet:P ifie4Corse Location : 45pol' o LJJet Aire.S. cegg. XLaJ5ic Applicant : TO: dirks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 12,/ 4 4, Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : 412 4 Public Works Department E.44 " Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT OI� IE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON ff AT 9 : UU A . M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y UR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEAS PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :0U P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved xxx Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1X2XX 1) Agree to participate in any possible future improvements to So. 7th &/ or Shattuck Ave. So. Lt . D.R. ersson 1 /23/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions _ Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date allv . P; ari.nin T 2-1 9 7 9 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 00 I o eG � �� y��p�M'oai t� � ✓ ,s, .s3S''m_ "`r¢ra' SHSS .. .°,i/�+��'{.''':L.l"4 � ,yam 4 � 4S� �� e + r�17,2 Location : k csz.tr- ;k..f .4 Ju & ArreS% !?g S. Applicant : 4,.j jcpplA� 7 ., TOi Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : W2Y/6114 Police Department A, R, C,�'. MEETING DATE : // �° a Public Works Department if If AO' Vi Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division ''\ Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT G FO T E APPLICATION VIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) ' TO BE HELD ON AlRE 0 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD, FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y UR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEAS - PROV DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : j i I Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved 4 W 5. 7 s7'. ZbE6 1 22-8,/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date , - 1 �fQ` i Pl anni '� 12-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : A.ate ®` I , opo sw 4 ,: dl a Ap ,°:t�# (��' `�. +� ,r Location : . ' �' 'co r r cif l a Q�e 4 creS �° S. ,)24-• . Applicant : Aul"`., r ii„,, _ TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : U?,eA Police Department • A. R. C, MEETING DATE : /4470 Public Works Department o ' a eP Uq �O En ; 'neeri ng Division E Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT FFO EVE6�J E APPLICATION RI CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 : OU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y UR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T A TEND THE ARC, PLEAS PROV DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :OU P .M. ON /I / , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; -/„/-_=- c Eiki6aL AfC lam: Approved _ Approved with Conditions Not Approved ,c.,-/ 4 ._ I /-a ,_ 5:'/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representatirve Date i l ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-009-81 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-006-81 Description of Proposal: Rezone from "G" to B-1 of +4800 square feet si€e. Proponent: Henry Daubert Location of Proposal: Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street • Lead Agency: The City of Renton • This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on January 28 , 1981 , following a presentation by Dave Clemens of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-006-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: January 21 , 1981 2) Applications : R-009-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Were received from the Planning, Police and Building Departments. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under: RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal is compatible with the existing uses in the area and it will not have an adverse impact on adjacent properties. Signatures : 6-: -e//•!eze---- d )4( (67/(67_41,i on Ne son, Building Director 'yid R. C emens, Acting Planning Director RPPPPic lard C. Houghton, 2cting Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: February 2, 1P81 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: February 16 , 1981 2i 1;® Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : FN©/re(R., 4,endR.) 19piguoge.iA,earopt e5-114 frolosi (f%"1 8-9 1p S10 4 nee 45 4M Act 1111 4.44 V@ L o c a t i on : Aj t/I[� y�pi t: C Are, (��yp �4 �"'�O` Iit �� 11"W �fL O' 0 + SD ? �p Applicant : batcrl, '; , Hy . TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : A47,0 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : //_71/J$I Public Works Department V rr If is Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Bui'Tding Division Utilities Engineering E. Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT ,G FOj� 1E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON c�� AT � : �U ABM. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Y UR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASLFROZIIIE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON r' • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,E. Approved v" Approved with Conditions Not Approved 6-Qu// Z /Lt% 2C 7- ,2 5 2d 2 S i - C ).i--- -- . .//2/ Si nature of Director or ' Ithorized Representative Date Of REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : / Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved CA L___ 1Nr 1/24 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date P1 anni nc 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appl i cation : Fzmegr 6 %. 9. P 1erg CI rftlaidebet.. ♦r r,° 8i14iteAclure Location : 4,1co ter af &Li/04 AreS . Applicant : bot ark eel 64y TO: arks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : X2,2* /i Police Department //2 19I P A. R. C. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department o�r Pr If_ Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT G FO T E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :OU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEAS PROV DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY S :OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE Approved xxx Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1 XRgINE 1) Agree to participate in any possible future improvements to So. 7th &/ or Shattuck Ave. So. Lt . D.I�:� ersson 1/23/81 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 172/11, ! Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation . ,® i T t •' Apasa/4.„frezpowe 5104 frovoi p ok eiap ® ®may ej •hf `1 i'":"� 4�"��:�� k�Z:3.� �� Fie � ;:- A6�.Y� ,e l � i�6 a - Location : AktyitiOr SidlUet AVE'S. ' ems . 7'Al.'",, d Applicant : . `in trier t® IA07 TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : U7Yl9 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : 4474kfji Public Works Department / � �� s o Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT G FOVE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 : 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF AR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEAS ROV DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2FArn,e?wkef Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved 49reg ie l -74 p i.e-,#04--/e- i ti A� 4. //.). is voi'c4 d, S. 7 5/ ,E1 6 /- 22-g/ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1/7(i ® Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : RF,Aorgeak.. 6egc-,9A) 4/9, ,4! ,pe'enesrl frOvel ' %"4 13'1 ivAssigy age 4s di rosiodieW esa&e iii 411e4ivere Locati on : MUCOVIter 0 Stailuet 4reS. fel S. 711(571. Applicant : 444064vy TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : cU7,2* Police Department A, R, C, MEETING DATE : 00/ Public Works Department En 'peering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT G FO T E APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEAS PROV DE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON /f27/ / REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : jjz4.�r/c E/v6/ VFF', '1N6 ---it-pproved Approved with Conditions Not Approved V1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date -_-e4 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative - Date I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON , ON FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . CHARLES R. UNGER Application of variance from the Shoreline Master Program 20 foot setback requirement, file V-112-80; property located at 3717 Lake Washington Blvd No. 2. THOMAS R. DAHLBY Apple ac.film for variance from the Zoning Ordinance setback requirements (Section 4-716A) and a variance from the Parking and Loading Ordinances (Sections 4-2206 ( 1) (a) ; 4-2206 (1) (c) (2) ) to allow the reduction in aisle width and stall length; property located at 1402 Maple Avenue S.W. 3. VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. Application for rezone from G to M-P, file R-004-81 , to allow construction of State Motor Vehicle Inspection Station for automobile emissions; property located on the south side of S.W. 10th Street between Thomas Avenue S.W. and Lind Ave. S.W. 4. HENRY DAUBERT Application for rezone from G to B-1 , file R-009-81 , to allow potential use as a remodeled office; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Ave. So. and S. 7th St. Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 24 , 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: February 8 , 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTI1'ICATION I , STEVE MUNSONHEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 6th day of February, 1981 . - SIGNED: 4ti_ OF R4,� •► o THE CITY OF RENTON U t$ © Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 -1 man ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR I PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 235- 2550 0,9gr�O SEP��4�� February 5, 1981 Henry Daubert 645 Shattuck Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 Re: APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 , file R-009-81 , to allow potential use as a remodeled office; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Ave. So. and So. 7th St. Dear Mr. Daubert: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 16, 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for February 24 , 1981 at 9: 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Roger J. Blayloc Associate Planner if'd'- .ii Y.. ajps •ft' f f t ,•'i1t '! r N , i. EN VI it- ..1 , EC ; PROPOSED ACTION FINAL DECLAMATION OF NON—SIGNIFICANCE REZONE FROM "G" TO B-1 OF +4800 SQUARE FOOT SITE; FitF NO . R-009-81 GENERAL LOCATION AND DR ADDRESS NORTHWEST CORNER OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 7TH STREET POSTED TO NT TOFY I6 TE - E TED PERSONS OF A! E V 0 se NM E ,TAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENT®."„` ElNVIRD''ff$MENTAL REVIEW Cr=MMITTEE C E.R.C. 3 HAS DETE;t: f:W'INED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTT®}' ODD ES 44 *ill=ES11; HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPA : T ON THE ENVIRON— MENT. A • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STAVE sE<'NT, DILL ALL NOT, BE REQUIRED. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETER6VIINATION MAY SE FLED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5200 P.M.3 FEBRUARY 16 , 1981 _ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT \ 235-2550 DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE -!WITHOUT -PROPER Al AUTHORIZATION '''• r Y N._� y,f ] »~.i 1 k, `S J r4,.,;r > �4a�� , 't{Yp• r1 5 d A 1 '4 r A yr 1.1.,t Ni {d" @.era• .�t xy14. f...d� v yE ' [ i iJS :iS.'• Aa.A��+. t jt.i L IP rts 4':- Rx Y' I, y • ram" t�`' ptt �ir� •' 't" ,fl.1tw fl'a, Qb 3'< ..1.�t� ^` ' k s r?4f iiI x R r ' I ,c 3. ^1 1 t•i R.�'� ° ti s F. i'Y d �aa+bI+r' 3,4 iy 5 GENERAL LOCATION: A' ' t !F- ADDRESS: NORTHWEST CORNER OF SHATTUCK AVENUE SOUTH ,AND SOUTH 7TH STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 r I S POSTE II TO NOTIFY '' ®PERTY ..WNE0 S OF Y f ti ,f 4j` {q{i g�4.'4,r.:. ;�'!. �A? .e i 4:1`\' :ti�}' i .3�t�-fit ; 4 . • I, ;yT 5�>,. ., • art a y: 1 , t . i Y 111.v j v .. 5'": r yylek ` Ar •• r : ,l cN • T:i'. •fix ; TO =!E HELD • IN CITY COUNCIL C ., A = E S, MUNICIPAL I UILDIoti r oN FEBRUARY 24, 1981 ='EG6NNi 9G AT 9 :00 _ .Ma P.M. a �1 4 f;h and '` ,'k R �� F 4 ii '' u' j 6 , , — G TO B-1, FILE R-009-81 A N ' d: sp :.,-, , 1 i. ,,.., i { ., 11 ' D SITt:-., 4,, ot ,',.• la'' j" .r • : : 1 1A1 , , /I. 1 . . .3 : ' . Ett. --' i.E , ae fr I , ,s�. Y ''i a ,u.' ,i({; "ti'a t tr GE1:I\£ ',j 'L f, Rf k. FINAL DECLARATION OF NON—SIGNIFICANCE — DIRECT .1 APPEALS TO HEARING EXAMINER BY FEBRUARY 16, 1981 Fs FURTHER INFORM r,T'ION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE —T TO BE RE '' i1V i, ,A'ITH UTi ,s "1)PER AUTHORIZATION FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : R-009-81 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-006-81 Description of Proposal : Rezone from "G" to B-1 of +4800 square feet si€e. Proponent: Henry Daubert Location of Proposal: Northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street Lead Agency: The City of Renton This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on January 28, 1981 , following a presentation by Dave Clemens of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-006-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: January 21 , 1981 2) Applications : R-009-81 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance : Were received from the Planning, Police and Building Departments. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal is compatible with the existing uses in the area and it will not have an adverse impact on adjacent properties. Signatures : .Yr":� L f,' tom. ;£_.. �L (‘:,(7/ /^1 ,on Nelson, Building Director 6-..,.." viR. Clemens, Acting j Planning Director RicFiard C. HougFiton, Acting Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: February 2, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: February 16 , 1981 Date circulated : Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - Otis - Q( APPLICATION No (s ) . fi-oof-goi PROPONENT : D&UAer* /41n r � r PROJECT TITLE : R 2aAtE Brief Description of Project : ereros•at i/'E7.OftiQSiTe'' oti4 " 6 "17) ,Q/ -to passrhfy u s e s s a tern edre/Je e LOCATION : AfK/(0,/farofe tfluc/,jvE.. 1) 57 7- SITE AREA : tygop BUILDING AREA (gross) -- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : f/ 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : !/ 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north.: s „/4 .4 ocvagin� east : It • ff to /AJ /f south :Je{ro Par-1 y1 i vie /O 71 west : Avils S W .?.02 ya.r-J Land use conflicts : Psfr44.5.+++.. jrrPerkrS' 7lvner View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : t� 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : !/ 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : /ice 16) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : v 19 ) Recreation : '20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : 11 ,�� A , 4�w►.. 1-e s[el e*[C e tp N �^�'" s-A 6 u 4e S Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : 6-Tegrfre AN slyTitle : if46? ,,se:PP- Date : f/2// FORM: ERC-06 . Date circulated : //2// ( Comments due : 1/2 7/g/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEh SHEET ECF - Peg- gf APPLICATION No (s ) . IQ—berg-SI PROPONENT : DE:wiled-1, /icily PROJECT TITLE : A6ZO,(/6.- Brief Description of Project : %PoSm ( fp rez W) -5V)e4lao .'►v h(6 " )L �"I'�l�pofss' /r Use a S a re#-ioA eel0 if Ike iN 'C otov'e LOCATION : /1 a GDrner- p �iLA,.ITUG�C Ave. S. _' S. 7thc7/ t SITE AREA : f' ?Ol BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : `, 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : R 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : �( 8 ) Land Use ; north : • east : south : west : Land use conflicts : N bN View obstruction : 0 0 y 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : �( 12 ) Number of Dwellings : )( 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 1 traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : �( 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI ' DOS More Information Reviewed by : f�e . 4, Title : Ftt- ' a-3,(g- oar Date : FORM: ERC-06 • Date circulated : 42.1Z9,4__ Comments due : , ' ENV IRORIKENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - %/.,< - 49/ APPLICATION No (s ) o `60 q-sl PROPONENT : Deter- 7 We4,, PROJECT TITLE : C-ZOVV°6- Brief Description of Project : -9,0p®sed stO r zot jeN(i20P . 116 '1 k t)pass. it use a s a. Pe ® /eJ,o f 1�i�� i Y10101/-12 LOCATION : /rfy Dorner • f-S ITUetC Ave• S `�`' s 7 v r SITE AREA : -' " V16 BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : — IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water .& water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : s. 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : y . Recommendation : DNSIxxxx DOS More Information Reviewed by : 'Z ' TY R. PerssonTitle : Date : 1/23/81 FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : r/2// ( Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF .- 410 - APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : C PROJECT TITLE : #PZ®, Brief Description of Project : i 0f& , ( / re2oGtcp' . /lee <-0iP. "cS " )4 7te)po$51' iruie a 5 arm® ,44/4? Yuluv- LOCATION : A G®r iet ey $ Udc �. S ' ,S, 7 7! SITE AREA : J74/ gO BUILDING AREA (gross ) --- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : � L 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : l�/�itio,r traffic impacts : /14 (-Lc, 14 ) Public services : I �- 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : o- 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSIv • DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : ( Title : Y2_,t4L cpcCa1 g f" Date : 8 / FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : 0// ( Comments due : // 7/ ® ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVJIEY p+ SHEET ECF - - gt APPLICATION No (s ) e 4'60 q-Si PROPONENT : qg er1 144per PROJECT TITLE : 16-fa • Brief Description of Project : Appp$ I[ rez ,e , i1e ® PI 6 "`I It,pfiiv,4 ify 05e a 5 e Peon cJgto/4 jai lie 1601C)ire LOCATION : /YWe.°rilet- UcJ( Ace. . . I' 7221-c5V SITE AREA : 4 5 BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (5'6) : — IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : C/ 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : p , 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : l/ 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Date : 4/ZZ7e FORM: ERC-06 receipt # 14eg,/- C I TY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME i ) v tk.10(:" t tTit- C. Or, a I:1r, ) DATE / I I • 6 PROJECT & LOCATION /4 a irg',./ Co is 16 t--)e /1)e.,?: /it; & c;;I% o Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total YEZ F u CT i 0 rY/1/ 0 • Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES 00 Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. - . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE JANUARY 28 , 1981 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING BUSINESS: JAMES BANKER (ECF-623-80 , SP-111-80) BURLINGTON NORTHERN (ECF-523-80, SP-451-79) OLD BUSINESS: ECF-635-80 HARRINGTON PLACE CONDOMINIUMS B-243 (STIRSKEY HOLDINGS LTD. ) For consideration of report from Parks and Recreation Director concerning recreation mitigation : application for building permit to construct three-story building containing 35 one and two bedroom condominium units ; property located on the southwest corner of Harrington Place N.E. and N.E. 12th Street. NEW BUSINESS : ECF-004-81 VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY INC. R-004-81 Application for rezone from G to M-P to allow construction of State Motor Vehicle Inspection Station for automobile emissions; property located on the south side of S.W. 10th Street between Thomas Avenue S.W. and Lind Avenue S.W. ECF-004-81 VEHICLE TEST TECHNOLOGY, INC. SA-005-81 Applications for site approval in V-006-81 M-P zone for a +4200 sq. ft. automobile emissions testing facility and a 15 ' -20 ' variance from the required 60' setbacks on S.W. 10th St. and S.W. Grady Way to permit location of the facility 40 '-45 ' from the property lines ; property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Thomas Avenue S.W. and S.W. 10th Street ECF-007-81 BOB' S BIG BOY RESTAURANT B-246 (MARRIOTT CORPORATION) Application -Tor building permit to construct 5600 sq. ft. ranch style building with 120 seats and 70-car parking lot ; property located on the northeast corner of S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. ECF-006-81 HENRY DAUBERT R-009-81 Application for rezone from G to B-1 for potential use as a remodeled office; property located on the northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street Date circulated : Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL ENTAL CHEMIST REVIIE69 SHEET E C F - 006 -- g f APPLICATION No (s ) . PROPONENT : (2. r PROJECT TITLE : ��/�/� Brief Description of Project : Toros of re,-e ze SalfPP® l 9 5544 s e $ ez, f' ' © 4 10 J a e ;eel Wte11�fW-� LOCATION : ✓ (4,o'epa �.> �fi v�fm. v�• �• '5")� SITE AREA : 90 Ce. BUILDING AREA (gross ) — DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : -- IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE �..•� INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : [ V 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : &sm� 3 ) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : �- 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : •te -11 ► , (i, /1e,Q((1 34. eo east : south :ffe1r0 , r t t e' west : tA-2) SA , Land use conflicts : J 0 0/4(.$01'04 r Y"oNP A rop adr. e e a,p View obstruction : 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreati.on : � 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : j ` - f 1 i(71-e S C e.L e-vc C e IA 0 A a u Cel 4 e S Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : ; c,� �,� � 1 itle Date :_ ,C FORM: ERC-06 tkl G IR \pti CITY OF RENTON ; \ �� i\ RE7ONE APPLICATION01* FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1- LAND USE HEARING 30 1p^ APPLICATION NO. G % EXAMINER 'S ACTION A e t. APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED "l < � ,% '/VIP,'r RECEIPT NO . /4/)J/ — 4/4, ( /7p,°- ) CITY COUNCIL ACTION _.. FILING DATE ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : Henry Daubert, 1 . Name - -- Phone 255-1618 645 Shattuck Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055/ Address Aatatia4-1 , 24032s614Le, .44213OrtarMAQ 9h1� 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on the northwest corner of ,Aatsxce(NmSouth 7th Street and Shattuck Avpnup Rrynth 4 . Square footage or acreage of property -Soo square feet 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) ---- That portion of Government Lot 16, Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington; described as follows: So. Beginning at the inter Y cc-ton of the north line ofA7th with the west line of Shattuck' troc� in the City of Renton; thence west along said north line 120 feet; thence north parallel with said west line of Shattuck_Sit eet '7S feet; thence east arraallel with said north line of 5o.7th lT to west line of Shattuck ; thence south along said west line 73 feet to beginning; .less the north 33 feet thereof. 6 . Existing Zoning G (general) Zoning Requested B-1 (business) NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7 . Proposed use of site Remove the substandard or unusable structure: and remodel existing single-family residence for (a�gwt� >/pa- CFA64 SJFAGE 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Proposed use is compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning. Removing some of the substandard structure . and remodeling the existing residences will improve the aesthetics along with certain associated landscaping and buffering. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? As soon as possible 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 **See attachment for additional information, ,, -- / ' .221.1?-.20----- c________9 1,7 _ iE I 11230S-9133-09 11-23-05 9133 14 437 0 T 211 I 13100 WOLF OROS OIL CO INC E0171IP0R OF IL aLY ELY OF STATE MIY 15300 142712 1427121 9075 RAN RD NW I1 1 I1 DF eH HOL ^T7YCK ST S OF C/L OF SEATTLE WA 91107.4.,11 Wvt /ROO 1 N OF II IN OF 71$ AVE ►R00 LESS 1120 FT LESS N 250 IT SUIJ TO ESMT TRANS LN R/W LESS POO WITHIN 101.1 CORM AT I Pt _k_L IP QGEI _ t It u L 1L_0 AL .t113L L ..P A G1 R s.TTMp 44C1• pall .ANCI\kUWt• %AW\AOOPii7 ----I "--- LOOM O[t[11VTION WI 4t1 4, t COOI AIM WILTu 4RC NYTI_�OTw W 1 OUN .MO MtT. O.'T. ON S LN CF L 15 FR UCH S I/4 COR � �. SEARS S 19-17-37 1 215.2S PT TN N • 1-15-13 11 1l0.55 FT TN N 73-31-12 ' E 110.7S FT TO TPOI TH ON A LN ►LT L ISO FT ILY OF C/L OF SHATTUCK AYE S 0-15-15 11 24.4E Fl ' , i' TO SELY COO SD PRACEL TN N ' • 29-m6-21 N MI6 FT TO ELY R/Il . IN OF RAINIER AYES 7T OF NON- TANGENCY OF A CURVE CENTER ' RARING N 49-32-00 1 507.50 FT I ' . TN ALG A CURVE TO LFT 1N HELY DIRECTION RAD 507.S0 FT THOU C/A 22-07-13 ARC 01ST 195.43 FT TAP ON NON-TANGENCY FR UCH CENTER ' OF SO CURVE SEARS S 71-35-13 E 507.10 FT TN S 17-41-22 E 191.20 FT TX S 0-I1-15 U 145.12 FT TO TP01 ter^ 112301-9134-OG 11-23-01 5134 14.437 O T 2110E I ` . DAUSERT HENRY POO OF GL M. EEG AT NXN OF N IN I 194 . 154 0*5 SHATTUCK S OF 7TH PVC UIT9 N LN OF SHATTUCK RENTON WA 91055 ST IN CITY OF RENTON TN N ALS SO N LN 120 FT TN N PL1 SO U LN OF SHATTUCK ST 73 FT THE PLN SO 1 IN OF 7TN AVE TO U IN OF SHATTUCK ST TN S RLS SO U LN 73 FT TO SEG LESS N 33 FT THOF -'11�2306-913S-07 12-23-0S 9135 14.437 10 T 2110. 574.. MOFFATT EVELYN H S 120 FT Of POI OF POO OF GL 11 I 594.• I1214 ti214 3709 mom AYE N LY ELY OF STATE HWY SSW OF RENTON WA MOSS SHATTUCK ST I N OF H LN OF LTN AVE PROD I LESS E 120 FT 112301-l136-06 11-23-OS 9135 14.437 SO T 2110. 1 .1 1 INVEST LEST CORP C1275 POP OF GL 16 SEG AT N)OI OF 4 } .• i6602 RAINIER VILLAGE CO SHATTUCK ST 1 LTH on TN S 79 T 211 I . 35 S SRADY WAY 119-50-4S U 30 FT TM N 00-13-00 I •. l044 4 O O49 30292E RENTON WA 91055 2110 FT TO PT OF SEG TN S 11-50-45 14 120 FT TN N 00-13-00 I • 35.i2 FT till TO SELY MGN OF TR OF LAND OEE0L0 TO C M 1 ST P RY TN HELY ALS SO Mil 126.50 FT MIL TO ILY It1I OF SHATTUCK ST TN S 00-13-00 E 77.12 FT M/L TO ►T OF • • CITY OF RENTON/ WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. 0 Of P Environmental Checklist No. 4ee,/=-D6e eir,/ PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance ®Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance O Declaration of Non-Significance • COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following, questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND Henry Daubex't 1. Name of Proponent C 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 645 Shattuck Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 355-1618 404100 , 40kstd240Aa wow 3. Date Checklist submittedammumxor d�, l� ` ((D 1 %I 4. Agency requiring Checklist Rantc)n 'Planning fepartm,.nt 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Dauber ,t�` Rezone 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : • Request rezone from G (general) to B-1 (business) on' a parcel of property approximately (lPo7Dsquare feet in area. Such rezone is consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the site and general area as well as compatible with adjacent and surrounding land use and zoning. S a W 1 . -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : See attached 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Rpryone completion upon City Council approval and publication of nrd i nonce 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone from G to B -.l - Any further development or rehibilitation of the site will require building permit and construction in accordance with the building, zoning, and engineering codes of the City of Renton. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to.or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: Maybe. See attached 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: No. Metro park and ride lot across South 7th Street from the site is almost complete. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YET- MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES MAYBE NU— (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X lEs- MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, X either on or off the site? Yam- MAYBE NO (f) . Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X N�TES— MAYBE Explanation: See attached } -3- (2,) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES-- NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X VET- MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See attached • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters or in any alteration surface 'water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? • X YES MAYBE KU— (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, X or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise _available for public water supplies? - YES MAYBE Explanation : See attached • (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE W— (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or X endangered species of flora? YES- MAYBE NO • (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the, normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 'YET- M YBE NO Explanation: See attached z • -4- ' (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , X insects or microfauna)? • YES MAYBE N� (b) Reduction of the numbers_ of any unique, rare or • endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE, N0 (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Elanation: See attached (6) N_oi_ se. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See attached (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See attached (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the X present or planned land use of an, area? T MAYBE NO Explanation: See attached (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X • } YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an • explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES MAYBE NT Explanation: See attached _ . , • -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: See attached (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YET— MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YEc MAYBE NO Explanation: See attached • ( 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES M YBE NO (b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES RATITE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES F.ffire NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X the development of new sources of energy? YET— MAYBE El— See attached Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO • -6- • (d) Sewer or septic tanks? _ X YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE N 1- X (f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding • mental health)? X YES MAYBE X Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • ( 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the X quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: _ III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack o full •isclUsure on my part. Proponent: (si ned) Michael L. Smith (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ►/ City of Renton ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Attachments Daubert/MacLurg Rezone I. Background 7. The property is located at the northwest corner of Shattuck Avenue South and South 7th Street across from the Metro park and ride lot and immediately east of an existing non-operable motor vehicle storage lot. A mixture of commercial multiple-family, and single- family uses are located in the general vicinity surrounding the site. The 10-foot by 120-foot site is level. 10. The subject site may be best utilized at the present time as a re- modeled office use. Timing of such rehabilitation and use will depend a great deal on attaining favorable financing for such an endeavor. Any future use beyond this is not known at this time. II. Environmental Impacts 1. Earth - No impacts will be directly associated with the rezone itself. However, future development may have minor effects of soil disruption and changes in the ground surface. However, given the relatively small size of the subject site, such impacts will be minor. 2. Air - The rezone itself will have no impacts on air. Future develop- ment of the site may cause minor temporary air emissions which will not significantly impact air quality. 3. Water - The rezone itself will not directly impact water. Future development of the site may cause additional amounts of runoff. However, given the relatively small size of the site, such impacts will not be of a significant nature. 4. Flora - The rezone will not directly impact flora. Existing flora on the site primarily consists of landscaping typical to human residen- tial environments. No significant trees or natural vegetation exist on the site. Therefore, any impacts due to future redevelopment of the site will be minor. 5. Fauna - The rezone will not affect fauna that might exist on the site. Very little habitat for significant numbers and species of fauna, par- ticularly mammals and birds, exists on the site. Any future redevelop- ment of the site will generally replace one urban-type use with another, neither one of which supports significant fauna. 6. Noise - The rezone itself will have no effect on existing noise levels. Future changes in land use may affect noise levels to a certain degree through more intense site utilization and vehicular movement. An office use may cause minor increases to present noise levels during the daytime, but would actually cause reductions of nighttime levels when such buildings would be closed. 7. Light and Glare - The rezone itself will not increase light and glare. Future redevelopment of the site may add to or reduce light and glare depending on the particular improvements and their design, together with possible accompanying landscape screening. 8. Land Use - The rezone request is to change the land-use designation from G (general) to B-1 (business) . This action will result in eventual future change in land use from single-family residential to a permitted commercial use. One possible interim use would be to re- habilitate the existing structure" to office use. Such change in land use is compatible with existing contiguous land uses as well as the mixed land-use pattern of the surrounding area (i.e. , commercial, multiple-family, single-family). The general area is zoned either continued City of Renton ENVIRNOMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Attachments - Page 2 Duabert/MacLurg Rezone B-1, business; L-1, light industry; or R-4, high-density multiple- family; and has been experiencing a gradual transition from single- family to such uses. 11. Population - The rezone itself will not have an effect on existing population. Future development of the site may cause minor changes in the population pattern of the site from permanent residential to parttime or sporadic increases in population during certain periods which are associated with office or other commercial usage. No sig- nificant impacts from such shifts are anticipated. 12. Housing - Future development of the site will eliminate pbe single- family residence , replacing 1T with some office or commercial use. Such action is not considered significant, however. 13. Transportation/Circulation - The rezone action itself is administra- tive in nature and, therefore, would not have a direct impact on transportation/circulation. Redevelopment of the site to office or other commercial use may increase traffic somewhat. However, the size of the site will have a limiting factor on such increase. The close proximity of South 7th Street and the Rainier Avenue South transportation corridor will make vehicular access convenient to the site, and not significantly increase traffic north on Shattuck Avenue South. This street is presently used for a mixture of commercial and residential access, as well as an alternate through-street. Therefore, the change in land use will not significantly affect the character and pattern of such existing traffic or impact the surrounding area. 15. Energy - Minor amounts of energy may be utilized in any change of use in the site as well as the continued utilization once construction is completed. 7 . :. : DAUBERT REZONE REQUEST ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. Relationship to Existing Land Use The subject site is bounded on the west by a storage yard for inoperable motor vehicles. Further west is an existing gas station and the Rainier Avenue commercial area. The new Metro park and ride lot is located directly south of the subject site across South 7th Street. Directly west of the Metro facility is the Renton Concrete Products Company. Banker's Auto Rebuild is located further east of the Metro facility along South 7th Street. An existing apartment complex is located directly north of the subject site along the west side of Shattuck Avenue South. A mixture of single-family, multiple-family, commercial, and com- mercial access (to Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pepe's Villa, and Rainier Village) exists further north along the west side of Shattuck Avenue South. The east side of Shattuck Avenue South in the vicinity of the subject site is a mixture of single-family and multiple-family uses. The land-use pat- tern east of Shattuck Avenue South has been gradually changing from single- family to mostly small apartment or condominium structures. The proposed use is compatible with these surrounding land uses. 2. Relationship to Existing Comprehensive Plan and Zoning The proposed rezone is compatible with the existing Comprehensive Plan, which designates the site for commercial land use. The B-1 buziness zoning district corresponds to such Comprehensive Plan designation. The present zoning is clearly inappropriate for the site and inconsistent with surrounding zoning. Surrounding existing zoning includes B-1 directly to the west, L-1 (light industrial) directly to the south, and R-4 (high den- sity multiple family) directly to the north and east. Existing L-1 (light industrial) zoning can also be found north of the site extending from Rainier Avenue South to Shattuck Avenue South. Clearly, the proposed zoning is consistent with the surrounding zoning pattern. AFFIDAVIT 1 , Henry Daubert , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and swornbeforeme p this -1� day of <��t-!/ c, - p ,1 , 19 0 � Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at ,( yc/ • . (Name of Notary Public) J •(Signat e of Owner) 645 Shattuck Avenue South (Address)/ ��.� ,, /� � (Address) Renton, Washington 98055 (City) (State) (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION 'This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 ENDING • OF FILE FILE TITLE