Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-316 ...-14,.. .-„.„ _,,,, --. T....- - -71,-2 ,.-7- . : --1
., ,- . ,,',1,-0-!.°417.i-* . •
,-7,57m1.1•:".1.,;44,.‘...;44.,"1„a4.4&,. ,,..:.,3.. .. ..,. ,,.: . .,,,,,e .J,•-•;;. ; 1,v,, .--,,,.1, . ;;„.'-r• •
,----•-.. ,,,piit.11,.-.'v,••••,..„,:'- .1'4-,;;,,;.-it,iri•17-;,;:-.,-,.;;;- ,,;•-• - -‘4,-1-- •- --•,------ •,•- 1,I,ii ..,. - le "..- ''le '4... : - .';',..- •
3. '. -, ;::, - ' ,...”,:',.., ga,. ......,4—' -.3.-",...3. ".... -.: -,,:a • .-• ,s., -7 - .4t •
0..,,,...;,:- ,..-...,..,..;', . ...4,r.i.', .,,,.,74.„...4'..,..g.:-.;;V"Ik''',.,',;4'.,,k,.\::..''',.fts;'-',0/...":"•,.. ;,"-.',';-•''C'' 1:-f.-4;•:,...177-- .;,,.. ,..*.',''''4''''''
or '''.,.. '.-4. ';':.tit'J',4,4''••..,: •i 7 ..-;61: ri .,'..,-...- ' ;'•---: '‘',` ' 3.--''''11- ..,.'-..,aicit,,elAl'I' 3,-;*-,'."-- - .'-. .4.A:',4:44;;;',.1 ‘,",..•• ?..F, -
..,.diV.,s. ''ity...:..;.,.'' s.), ''0.'' .4!''',.`'-s.V'q.•k.,.,:',. ..'AI it.'...:sa'..., 'i,,' .. - —,,,.'1,7',,, • ;...'s. 's2.-^1.' %'7;:-..,-. ''..'''-'-..' ' --••'• - • --. • 4„,,T,--
kp it
.4'''. ' .'''‘ ?%'' ''n.' . ''''''' ''' '''..7- .-...."'' " ' . ' -.: ' i '• .• , """htz"7, '-'tfti'' ' • -r-,•••-4.-.-44,; y.i. -- ..----•-• tic ..-- ,-,.,,5v,..-.,-,1.•,- i•-‘:,,-.4'
,,...-:,.., ....,,,',,,,t,r,4- --...•c,.'A." '''-',...-iiir„..1„,..,..'...' .,...?:',...'-f`. ....f.'''' :'---wf - • ',- '' ".... , - ' •' ', ''-`4`:".----,/,',.. • - - .--• -.-.... • :.,-.'*1- -,':'', -. '..i't•,. ,-,,, 4,----',''.,':.4--..- ,.;.
1 .rit .. •-• -....1„.,,,:- ,,04.-... • .„,.,--,77.rr',...2.=.,.. p.„ ,...4,-:.,44,Ar..,, •,. .. ,,.. .,., -. ,,,. ..z.,.,, ..,,..;,,.,,,,,,,*-,.., „,•= , , .4..., •.. ,, 'i.o„.,,,.,,, rr ..R.,,-.r.;....' . ''e''..:'NI.f"-X.‘4;,'-.'-'--..3,-,
fr..'"'''"''''' '''- .. — '-'''-- '-'''''''''.•- ' ''' ' ".• .".- - 7r.X"-.- ''' ist 94 lit .1.,..‘" : - '...1.' ---4.--.44.i,'„•".. •' . ' .,--fr.'....-: ;/..1.1.:,•,.••••••ilt•,,- ' •-n. .e.".,.t.:•.....,;-.Z...,*,,,,,,--ik
. ',•-„,,... :. , .... ,7,.;!.:;;1,44,,k,..„,-....4.,,...,-•::.... 4
,--•-•.;‘,..;„:••,k,•.,...e.,.*.1, 1 ..:-. ''."•.,,-,,.,.1-,,.,.. •.'.. '.,:•,..2e.4-,' ,,.4;24..,„ ••,-, .;41f,".4e•• ''4,........".•"• ••• ',- ...-' ' :;-•• .„ t•-,,..V" .; ' •,„4.- '• •••. 1-11-,::1 ‘-."?,,••"%•..1...k..1,,
, ,.. :„:„„.„:....,., .',49'',-.4+' -A^&•-.ks ,:-.i..t.!''' ' . '''''''' ' ' . . ' ....'- . ‘• .' ' '''•;. ' ••• ';,?. ,t'''''''''• s'''.4 • ':XSO'',7'r'''' '-:'
: '...`,.,.; ., ..'.-A.: :,,--,T;,,:,,,...-1,.,,,--..• ..,,,-„ •,,,,T -7.,...1,-,,-,„54 ;.., • .•.. c.-...•-. .-... .. ;-...,,,,,i i.. ..i.;-:.--..•••••• ••••••4"- • '`.'' ,',-- ',,' ' ''‘.1' *--'.,4 t.4") - - 'A:- '''`C.::''''..".
.,',,,'.7'''44.'''' •...,7,.',',:11.4'..' •' ',,,r •';.;•,-,r; -,-,;:'.1,'',15';';'.:•-.'`,':;,...r.,....7 ..:,:i-‘...,, : ...,-„:.,,:a-' ,,r..."'",', •,';,-4-';','..:,....,:;,-..7,...):,-'4'.',,!',..,--`,,4. ,,i,,..„,,,,i,•,,tiF...0;,N,?
.• '.'.'
..,!'l L''','''''':)-'4'•L''A' '.;,A,'"1.1.1''''''''.i.pii.''lk ,,^4'7',:eg..r '-i:::•' . '-'--.;-'t. , -i.,;', ,--.)".'-':.-P,..* ' -1,,,A,?'',-• '''.---29::i'ft '.. ',,-'.- 4.:7(.4 ij...iM;'0'..:.v4, z' -,,,. ,I,V... :./i,i• ,-.--,..^:,,i',.,'.
- ''' "-''' ,,'" --i'r," ''r 4',. r. •r• 4i -;11-;,4,;-',. r,,,, ...,-,. .,- ,,,,-•.r,i.-',,•'," .f i,r.Y.eiV4-•;-,',.• k!,:.',., ,.:-.•••ei,,,,,- ,....:.,-..- ,.,„,:;.)(--.t..7.1:',..rom,t f.,.-...1:4,,` -. .1,,,,
-<,4'.',4,,,',';f4-.-,'.`. 5.., , .010:'t...41,....*2-,,,,- "',,,,,..;,. . ....„!-,•;„,,,,,It.;',:n ,"..". .:!.-.:- -: %'41-'!--.:ti.----.:4",,,,,??,-...1,1,,e',..,' ..,-,..,.„A,0,14.,..i v•,,;t.-.01t5:,-;;;.,4,,,,..-,,i4:44-i.,...41. ,.: ..i.--., ,.•.:-.:,..-:•:,t,.... ,,t,,--rki -St..,-•:;`,4,-.
0
!- -,, ••-.•,..-,,',,,-;:,..... .- •,‘ !it'4....•-•.4,,,,;,',.,.,.•,,.„,rtrip ',-.4'.,-v-,. ' 4,FL.'re:'.:.,;Y..W',f. '..i'4!.'.' T,`..p,‘;- .:4,' ,,INS.1.0 ,,''1",;.L.d ---.0,-• ' '''' • eilqinTe;44.- .‹.;•'''• , '.;',',4
, ..
' )'• •iy. • .1 ,tt,- . • . v: 4!if.,.*,1.
-,. _f, ,,...i -,?-.-,i,!,,r,,i ..,,, , ..,,s- -,- -., ,...,., . ..-,,-,-,..,....,z,,,'.; ,,,i;,;b,,,. .;‘,.,..., ,.,-;'--,,::.-,., ...,„7, „ -,,,, t.,., ,,, -0 ..P.::.'i''.!: It.!,_.7'..'7,4F ''"ir 4,ti• ".:4(;',. ;,'.,,,,)ifi/444,".L''''''.',±'''''
•':'' fr, .,' n`-:- .;1 4%,14'?r,,,,i,li-:.-,- % ..,.;''q','1; ': ' •.--).,,'?',-,;.',"'fj:al.'.tilk-, -. .;,.-, ;,,,.i. -..:4;•-,•••,.;;,":"A,:;,,,.....-;` ..• ..::-...'sr.,.:-•,,-•,,,, T.-'-:'-it. -' - .••*T 'fr.:*•*** * ••••:"-; {'lit. '''..".47%.:-
„,s'+?..rfr„',,,p,,.., '• ,-.••'..t ,10TpOriN,•,.?;tii,, 4'-•:'-',":-''''%'*,',!,;•:. : - ,', -!,At.,,ielt0. A i;,' ,-,.- , ,.-... --.•• •.., . •--1,,,:•.;;;;,,i4..;,t,*i-.2'.,..,t..:,,,,i,,,i-,:„„-:-.•;...,,,,;-., --,,,4014:- -,.4-,; •, .'f',".4:,,:,:',','.,`,.,„
• ,,;„N7'...k.3- }".• 4 • 14,-..‘,..s.' -,',..' 'r-;._,.... , '1.:, '',..'',4„.„ a-$4,,%-.a-• .7.4 ' ,.., .5-,.-..:,:... -.", ... . ...,?..4..a.' ,.---„7„.'..:,...--,.A;,::'' ',',,I,L,..`,.'.'s:.'14 et,fr,e .-• 4‘111.• -"'4''. y.-.4..4.-i,-.,.ilt
., *,, ;frz.'-'4-''` ..•:;"••14,:,,,,••...'.'..'NM,,7,.' -4:4';''.',. .'es-2,':,-',4441.-j.• 4 41 , .. ..,: ,,,-.:. .,,-.4 t.1,"'.2,1,'•
2 5
..„,,,..„ . -,,,,,,--F.,-.‘;:•„'4"..-•---,ft!....8fr, .:,, r 14::, .f .4;'• ‘•5, ltor'744,14"4 v.,...1...,.....e.,,,...*.
I,17,-..1,,.;:.,''.''.;: , ih,el•,...'",'"?' ,. OAT,1,1,_ - : - -: '. -!,:..C.:;',,' ip,,...-' .,y,,.- 1:1,‘,C .,f•...., -•1;1.-,',',....4,'W.,‘;',•• 1.'''445'''f'*!!4"';'1.r.'t" )'":115V1*.t&f*: ,1--.''',.•'4'' ."''.;•,2tIr '"'..).'4,4
''''' I''' '' ' ' ''' ,1‘,FT,.. .4 - • ., ,,". - •,, , . ,
1:•-•"''''14'‘..ii-','filffirt 1'.4.1''",i.....;-'wuk,._,..,,,•„,04.,,s,..,, ? '-'....!'-'-'',..w• ....-*',. ,-,•,,,• -•-•64,,,,„A•N,.k ,, ''''''',,',..'",„,4,11* --s;:•;';',Irt,'!xii-',-'4 ,*VT.*-I•'•-', ''''''''''-• ' --*04', 1
,..•-,.. 4..7.-;.1,4.,;..., . • -,-34/-t. . Itif•-i,,,,-..-.., i.t. ;,,,,,4--- ,.-,,,,,,i,el ... ; ..• 4=,;r-N-1,;•-,,,,..` .. ...,;,;'4,,,,4-..,,,c-.:-.4.4.5.,,•,.-A,..7....%,_,-.,.- ,....,....., .(;.,',,,.1,">4._ .'•".• ,-,--t. •40',;,•':,,,,V-,,,it;•
,,‘,..,,,e, ,-,4 1,,,Ar,,,r , ,,,,:: -r,ert.. -, :41,:,: ,„,.•,,,,.....4...1,-,;:.• i..,1_ ,..,r,,,,;'•%..,,,..1k .....,.:„.1,:I,,,,i: .,,,i...„..... , , • atil-i),,,,,,,... .„,,;......4,,...,.,.......„,„1.,,,..;,,,,...,-,..s 0 r--.....,,,,j',NI.,.,.- -ir-... ;• ' _„r 4,,,,,..,...4,r,l,wr.,-
......1. .i;4 ,,,,a3i...„..:t, 1-.A,... .4.•4,141-„„ci .,:,.a A.7.,,,-Itr:•• 0...",".i.7,......14.„:4,,7".-...".-iii,..„,.,. ,<_,, ..,".:4t.-,- la,.;$t, :.:: ..,, .'„".„."7-.....,-,..,,,-pf.,„--„.. ..------,...,,,,.:.;4,-.-:,.-4'4,. .... -......k.e.5.4 ,'-'.. -*'74§,•.?; ",Ti--114';Igt,-0.1
-.ir • . '''''''', ''''''''.,0,' let4:111431.4:.'1,-•,„'-'.''.,.•-•!... .,,p ',:':-.',','" .Mr-.;Aii."-,2-... „,. '''...f.lk..:.. '..! '',',,".'.7.73.7"tv.Z7.10"1/4,--..."..-f:-',.:,-'1'•',.;„y.,.','0-::-..: ,' ''.:g4P.r.t;'' -„ .-. ''.. ''X'',K4i4Z--•,,,Z1.;',).!',''• 'tr.."4 ,, ,'-'.-"- '-,_*„
A,.,'•.,' ,.,i,i_,,ri....,... .31'Wir:ty :', ' ;-it":.',,k.s:!••-,t 1 .1,:'..s5.1•,t,;;Of.t,''',r ;7 ,.,-, •,,,,,,..,ay.,,,;:-. )-ii.v.,- . -, -- .--..- - . ,/ •••,-, ..- ,---.1.-..-r.. , '. fwit.,,,,';,=.:' -:•';-4'
fr
..;,-,•. .,,TA.4.60ij.,,.... 04•Rw.,....,tl.„•,,..*,-.•'.,,-;,;6.;;,...• tii:A,--1.'1.,,,:.,.--.1.,, -..,,, . -.'--:?•,,,t,..,f••.';'•''',-i;:,,..V-Ii:tt..".;•., *.,,-..,.,,--,•"--.:•-; ,.. `''',.••:::.--t.,t?- ',...,./0'.'. •:-''2.K. ,- -L.;.***.'''..;4k-'r4' '''.'fil,'':'''!''14
4'' ''''''*.5T-f—'' ''' ''''1'fr`-02'..c---"-•T*'''''',4 , •-" --;234•911. ,•-''': . ----.-.'-,•.-.',....4..,..'0....tt.),...A.4-1. ,,,',4),".....1..-''' ,-„',,,,,.g,-'i:-.,it,„7.,.14r. • :‘..,.4,a...,,,.., , *, ,.....,-," „,,,,Sj. _ ••,, -....,.,,p,,,,,,,
4 r:- 't,' NO:-" -t - ;- --;',-... ',.--- -y.' ''-t-'-'..-2 ,-----' ti.,.., --,%,. -,-,,4;,-11-0,..w.,-- .0 -..,':-,,,-...,.-4, •1'.., ' .r.41-,a-,...,.-.=,.,..:44,,,,.../r ,',4 -.tie „.t..k•47,45
tilt,
il-f"':'-f-;;S?,.,,,,z-"4... ''A'''''-'2„i''5W4!'7'-': •'''-.•''.2';',7'' ....... ''.:'...:-''.:'1.4',,,, -.t.,,, ,,, ',Z4',,,... ' .1 .•.,,.•.. - ' ; - --`,'*..:',;.'..-..'-,kai..'•->4 .....,,:, -.-.i.:,, .,-,..:‘, T ,:v=,,,,,, .n*4. , ,,,,,..,,. . .,,,,,c,,,,44,,v,
-,.... .: ,...-,....rk, .,.4. , ,ii.,,,,,, 4, '0, .. -- ''''',,",.-; ,- ".'!"..".7..",-'-4 -z..4,,,W.:•-:",'!'3'.,-h" . .- '4'%!‘":L• 4" 6 Av.':..'.".6,`6,r-'''a- , 0;".4'!""----;".•'‘.-K..:.-, , ::,. .at'..-.., -f- --$. '4;47- tt3re'-i,t3,:-:".'la',, •
'' ,'.''' . ito- -, ---..40,'N'il' • ..7',,tritl''';.7,-,.• • ;••,!,,6,.....`c.`..*, . ,t,-. .-,' ,-.'..-tr'7'• -:- •'.!',-.-..t.'•..-.4 s',-17,',-,-:`L' -,-,-,., '1&-,:-....,ew.:•.'''',,:''• •''. ,•,•,1 40.- '.*!• .t." ., ., .7"''',' '
'N i A. . s.i.k,I.,.1,-.,.. -''.. .;;W•2,' s '''•- ,., '..,..,,i,4, 4.114,„i. 7r.....,1....'' '....*'!:1.4''''''' .::-V,.''''. '-':' ' . ....'cit..'.•'" ' w ., . -,' .'" • '.... .i a.a ' . -',' - :'-' -:"'
to 4#4.'- . c ":- 1...;,-' .4.;•• ' i;,,!•''-'.'-'‘k*i',X11-4,. ,_ s. Ri. t.,5.7,,-4.4,- .1,W.tr..-,4•44.;‘,.
n. .: - ,r.,,-''. -,'' '..1.:-i.'_,.(7,,,,";', ' . -.•!--!---. .-",,.1. „. .. '''. . .3.5.-.0,4....''-.-...... .-. ',,..,, ,L ,;•.i ..::''
..-Siti 0.•,.., ..b...;;..,!;,c4f,.47 • '. • '•'>-• .4-, ,• .'-;; .' ..L._::—• '..' .—...-- -. ._‘, . .. —.7.--...„ --,--,' . 7 .,,..20.:.. q.bi:;??,,.';,-'--,-'w ,,, 4.., .'",;.1?V,,;?-.),,i' ',,,,PIT •
,, ,..;*.....,:c t ,..',,,'',.,f,,,., C,:, ,,, .''.:.', : ' ,,,,',,,.' - '..' '''',,L.,, .., ...i.1..'.1":.....,',4,'',,...'.., ‘1:,‘T.-I:: ''..f.-s:,,. ...' ' .,,‘ Y''1,'":lit,•;:.:,10,4U41.1%, '',X,'':' :rk:g....'-'4*:''.'1,7 •
'- ,-;.fi,'44,l'.4,t.,',b • :`r•'‘-..'''•I'',-" ''ligit3 644i' ' ''', = ' • - -''',...`;-'re'. '''...i. A '- - -'. :- :. .-‘• 'I,,'•. -.-2,4,.31',..,;‘,Vs:,,,..,•*•:,`' •,`',',...Li•- 44,A,.. ,i..ii:•.'-', .
..mifeliet,o..
1!--4;4-f- si'.''''''',"' -- - .- .,'`'"'. ... - •2.40 -'''i 3.'"."'''',:, , ''-',$.- - :.' , - .$-"...,',),.:. : ..„4,,-9-----., . • i-..,, ----. • -• -•,,,''''',.,-,, 1•N4:',4,'''-,.,„,;4:,;',"i :'''''..,-.,'-.T".' ,;,-4,''•*..""--•4*•4•.* ''''I
.J.ri:V•- •."'''"-.:'V'',C../'''.,.'7;'-f` ' 3',...-'..t, • • . '''''' '''''4,':'' ;1' ;- '' ' - •:: .• ' . " I, '•t%\‘11s ,'' .-,'. - ',/x'. ',r•-•••t.; ..;,,,<;-?. - :1'•. -tif4.,Itet, i.. ,- .,,
- - • ,-4.•;/,‘,„;:•. ,,4•...... .,•_.,..,r,„1.•••••1-„,,,,,,,, .,*,,,'..1 '., ,' ,, - ,,t;;,
•, -. .:„ . ,,. . ?,k.,+.: .r,,:" • "A: - ' . ' ' . • . '-- ' ' . :--7*-- -". ------7'77-?4:.,;•%; ? ', :''';- ' 't, •••*.•-j.'. '-4:4'• '.1r.;'.‘"ZIA
,..-.•4*'-'1,,/,' ,,,, r' '-• "'''.''...74,4.,,,,,,',P41.-,.. r-4' 4, ' •'-' '' .', ' ' .-- - , . I ' .- ''-' - -•-•, .•,i .-• ,,,.. , .4 . -..,`-1.-.,-,,,,.j.;., •1
•ty-
__,' ..;,-;.-;;.:1:, .. .•, - -.IT'-'..1,-", 1;;;;!... . ., . ' ,.. .,' •' ,
r.r:'....7,, .,5.0::: :::',;.c.e:Zt'''.7- '..'i,L t3,$) .• , .,_. . .,.' ' . . . ' - -- ...-- 1"--- -..i'''',0 r 7W,",,rx‘r".0‘ia1'''.'Af..-r it-,..;4,-,-f,,,,•.......0..,../it
'''*,'''-'.- .:,.. ..., ''r:•.--1::,,i-4' ''';" T''7:,-;','• "':''' ',''•' . '':''''',7 '.:.'''.. '''' '' ' ' ' '. '' ,- -.• - r"*.':4j".' ..ixt-fs.,..44"; ,.',,:•,---.- .1-,e';6-4•,1,:,,es.x:i.1,
.•:z...••-1- -_,;., ,,-.:1,i,..,.--7c) ' .,.• - ...,. •. • , • .: , ,...,. . . - • . ° ,•• ,•.47k.,-'....--,i,?- 1 .4,,,.".,:;4.1'.i,<,44%•'t .)tf,),i,T.4‘,„.„44
,, s ..''.,-',- , ..;•7 '-;,'..,,;„ ,„: -' . . ,' '''..'A. . ,- • ' $41 ' — 6, , .. ,, , kt',;-- ':41'4 ti ')*.17fr.•'.'••;1: '2*' 0' -',,,;.40,1V-foxi
,i,..,-,47...'7-, , '. •.:' ,,.',„ ,,,,... Q.-tc:,-- .s ,;. ..... .. .:,, . • ''""'1 L 4 '
...•••.,p,.1.-,..1?...-<•:. ,. •-•.:,, ,,;,,,. f ,.. .,•.•:,•:'...-.'",'... -,,::',..;,.,f-1., i•'.. 7,.U..2.,,,4E,,,- E. - A_4-.z.4. ,•;...,1--.. .,.s '' 3;3 "7 7_20. c p.... p.,r?
3 — -,-
....$r-:9. Eg rit-•ip* , •r, ..-..• ,...!.-...." . -
lt
. . ... .: .-'' .2 ,. -,/: 41, ... •• f' . • i '-..ft.-- ' .4'•-1, .
.,:.• '• ' .*:l'• '-- - ' I; .; • , -
t
- , ,... -i , , , •3.,
" , '.1.,„,s, ...- ' '....,:'. .. ''..-. - ‘::',r."‘..:,,',l' t .., ?, •." ' . ti", '414; ..,,,,..1.,-;.'7,'•N ,,-.),...',,,,r,.',..'4,.,' t '. A
--'',''X 4''.:%' • '- ' ... -. :,..,-.,;.,....... 1 '
. ' - '1 . -...'1.,.,f...•-..k, ,t.'';..,- . •
,
.--
' * .‘-6 's •••i . '' .- -$..a 6t. i':- :
•,d, . , • 4':‘,/,‘','„? '''', • !,;‘,"-,,zt,,,,,..'.••••.,< i 4
,' 1 . ' , 4 Zi • ' ; 4:` ' •L'.,,iiitipbe' ' ,A.,k-4.4'... '-'4•V••••- J..-":
J _, • •,41 ' ,,. - ...:*, . , ':,CitiltrIA4(.- '..,_. 4c r•';'4',
..fo„. . ,,,. ,,,4 ,_ X`''-.,•:,':r*4k7,-;.:1-- '--'). '%:•'-',', '''''
:•*- ' - ', .0,-—r . 4;4
' -1.(2)446-'
.:„....,Ttp (,. i :7,..-
•
I' . 7 ,•,..„ (..,0 -', v,- t - r-----lt ,r•IN., ,.. ,,,Ot:W k,,,;
.. ...7",110'-,.. •r-T. ,m,iimmi, . - /I - . .••••••••• •
- . .0•••••••• ,...,... 0„. ., 7,,:?,.04 ,t..i.4,0c :..„ otte:.+7,
-----.-"" 7-2 k „,,,-,...,,,,, .77-• , ,--, 7g • --, ;,- ,;1;,..,,-,,, -;.„, =I, , -,..3aa-, ..... '1, 's ''..:!'4,-,$ s'''ellii
* ''s,',Xle.ez ',,, --- .• . .
'p , ' • : •...:.-.,- ''',., •, ••••:, -0.-K-..,„7.04,;.*'' .-,..,4.,•-.' •.
/9'0/ \ i'lt ., •..
4 1- . 1„ 7 r'''` . . .. '.• 6 N
et, .
\t,
....
ka,
.*•' - .443 too '• •4 ,
n..(r1 ..,_
,... -:,
1,, •,4 - N t• ' „*'''''''t '' •••'' 'ar* •in
t 41 ' .-..., '4fr * -''' 4;04-‘,.-g-'.- ‘';.---••,,,aat',4:-. ..-.
......,-.. . ; .,,„, 14 j), ... . - ' •tt(10.4,t iik,,,,'...."5t1T,,-..,11A1,-,-i,tr-,F;.;.,.,,I..«,-,,, *4 -I
*' , 14. -L._.,O.,',.A.it„ri .. .'
,r11' til'916; 4. . •
.t 1?;),!6:,. :.;,•, e..:•,,, ..A,,.14, 1,,e -49110't 2 c=:7t'. ... • -V..!..1 ' *,-;1•:, ,..a,, _k___:.k7, .-,--,,...... .. -14.7,> . ....--._.ij:rt...., :."-:-.4,.flt-r-":..1,-.,;-'''W.,r,.;:.',...7,.'.';';.2"---14,-3:4.•;,-..A..,,6
. ",.'. - ..V.'*''''';'4140%44."'$:0,+•'-'iitia) ,
': °.. . ' . -11 E,DMO KID ' • .. ..' AVE. . • 'N
. ,1_Y___6,,c'...'..17...
Y.f',':'. -.,-';",..•••6",',.-.".,-,,k. ,-..,-..sF',',.7.*'v',,,4,.,',.,....0,.;-,',.,'e.s..-.
...4
-
147.8,t-,:: ' ' . ,. ' ':' -: , -NI4 (N. : . • . '''r' . ' '''.. ' ' ' '' , .. , ,, 4,,,f,,,:ii;f4r..'::fiY, .7.1'; ,'''TV '", 'el
.0''' .' - ' .0-4 379" . aff.-36' ' - ,' ' t'1)4 < • 4: ‘',:"P'' , - 7):2 • -,,,, 1, iG. •' ,, ' , ' . '.**,.„,4,"?.''-;.21 7,.,2.;r'''..'-)4",$.."-';':"..,---.;.4 i.!:: ', ''"
.-..,.',/!"_',.:,;),,,."2._,i,,,_, „zia4.1,. i..... .,.,..,-(b. , 4.1`.4i, . . ,t 1 , . -V%',.s.0 _ -,,„.!. . . ...-, „--. .‘ -, _,.*..‘. . , AV, ..11,:li.,.,,,,,,,,, ,...•,•,1-, ,,i;,f,,•,2,,.,,,,;e„-A- -_,1,.
6e., ,..., t .e. ,,- ,...,. 0 ,..,.., .. ,-. . . :,. . *- 4+••'7'.. , • ' .
' , •. ft'; -**,..'34044,,,, .!.. , ',.V..?
,, cp_ , i:,,...„...),s.:.,,,,l..,,:. ,S ..:.•.--r,4.1.s'.' .
• ')5; c''t-(4,`,I.,. .,'''';. ;,.. .,: % .1 C, . \ '11r4.41.. !Ott A---k •,,.. ...:.: •
. \ g ".. • • - 4'.: . '.. (A- • 6, ' .'- '"- - 7' ',..4,v,iii•••••4', -- ' ....
, t ' '1Z ' . - ' ' ' -- ' - 4 44 •SC .1* ' . * - ' • . \'' - ,.. tt t,, , ' , Iv. , 'C..'lit',•- .0 '-",T,',..f,:."',‘ .-,: '......,!-J
.. :,>al !Ikk "..1._ ..,... ‘' : -'N t' •• ••-::NI 0' .-- , • t .•'.: '.'.'‘ ,.','.., %., ,. '. r,.. ,,. :,',^..-4,,, • '4, 4,.lis,
,,,, , , . .tie , g - .t‘.. , vl . ,„,-1, _. •.s 11, -.(.1.,;., , .t ...--:-.---y. i ''0,6 *, ;", , '. ...`'/...l'.•::44"'... :., ..-"ir,,'
..1 :: .., op.3 relt,. ....,..7-. • ....tu. , - , -, .
. , i. 41a4.' 'y ; , : . . ..4.^-,,3\.‘ .1,...x.,:z i 1/t\'-'ca„::. (j4.,1131-0--'''''''."..-"N*7-7- %. -. ‘44. ..-7 !4. ..'1 . ,'' •,..;''' '' -r-1-''likttl; -•-•
'
- -•-•" - .,'' '...,`,•;"- ...It ' .., '. ,,,,, il
1
' uo . . , '
. • x, — - , * il ' 4 ., ...:,-- • r.voi,,144,.,•••e: '4•
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
May 14 , 1979 Municipal Building
Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order.
ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President; CHARLES F. SHANE, THOMAS
COUNCIL W. TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, GEORGE J. PERRY, MARGARET L. PROCTOR AND
RICHARD M. STREDICKE. ' (Councilman Trimm arrived at 8:10 p.m. )
CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; W. E. BENNETT, Deputy Finance
PRESENT Director; LAWRENCE J . WARREN, City Attorney; DEL MEAD, City Clerk;
GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and
Recreation Director; MIKE PARNESS, Administrative Asst. ;
WARREN GONNASON; RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; CAPT. JOHN BUFF,
Police Department Rep.
MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND PERRY, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 5/7/79
May 7, 1979 AS WRITTEN. Councilman Stredicke objected to inclusion of request
of Councilman Shane for inclusion of his NO vote - Page 3, Para-
graph 2; Stredicke noted request came later in meeting. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published,
Right—of-Way posted and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the
Vacation Public Hearing to consider petition for vacation of right-of-way
VAC-6-79 filed by A. Daniel Dansereau; signatures on petition certified by
East Valley Public Works Department as representing 100k of the abutting prop-
Medical Short Plat erty. Letter from Board of Public Works Chairman recommended
West of Talbot Rd. that petition be denied at this time due to number of problems
South of S.37th on the plat still unsolved; that vacation is premature. The
letter noted applicants have been requested to work with the
Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments to resolve problems .
Public Works Director Gonnason used wall map to explain area
(former Pope property) and explained development was indefinite;
roadway was condition of Hearing Examiner that it be dedicated
as City street. Discussion ensued regarding development to differ-
ent use than at time of subdivision. Upon inquiry, Fire Chief
Geissler explained no means of ingress or egress from S. 37th
(with tree in access from Talbot Rd.) for proposed three story medi-
cal facility. Planning Director Ericksen advised property zoned
P-1 and recalled history of development of property noting res-
trictive covenants. There being no public comment, MOVED BY
SHINPOCH, SECOND STREDICKE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED.
Vacation Denied MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION
OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND DENY VACATION. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE:
SHINPOCH, TRIMM, CLYMER, PROCTOR, STREDICKE; 2-NO: SHANE AND
PERRY. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published,
Street Vacation posted and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the
Portion of S. 6th Public Hearing to consider vacation of a portion of South 6th
East of Mill Street east of Mill Ave. S. as petitioned by Stirsky Holdings
Ave. South Ltd. ; petition having been validated by the Public Works Department
VAC-8-79 that signatures represent 94% of the property abutting that portion
of S. 6th St. Letter from the Board of Public Works reported
this street is not necessary for traffic circulation; the City
will require retention of easements over the entire 40 ft. The
Board recommended 1/2 of the appraised value of $1 .40 per sq. ft.
be charged abutting property owners.
Audience Comment: Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. , noted property in
vacation area is expensive, that City should realize more revenue.
Also Mr. Webb requested 20 ft. setback be reserved for turn-
around needed for switchback on Mill Ave. near Chalet.
Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Ave. S. , noted R-3 area and asked for
the additional space for "U" turn on Mill Ave. S. ; asked that
drainage be provided; that no variance be given for parking
• pee .3®t.77
4404; 41444600P
Renton City Council
5/14/79 Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING - Continued
Street Vacation requirements; that consideration be given to maintain alley access
S. 6th St. to west of vacation area. Public Works Director Gonnason noted
East of Mill S. alley not dedicated right-of-way; Councilman Clymer noted it has
been in existence for a lifetime. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND BY
CLYMER, CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO MONDAY, MAY 21 , 1979. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. SE, inquired re "Scared Straight"
program for young offenders and noted statistics proving the
Scared Straight value of program is questionable. Mayor Delaurenti noted the
Police Department did not favor showing the film.
Traffic Request Kathy Koelker requested follow up of 2/5/79 request for repainting
of traffic divider lines at Grady Way where 3 lanes narrow to two.
Mrs. Koelker inquired of research into conflict-of-interest for
City employees not doing business with City after leaving employ.
Conflict of City Attorney Warren explained that no such law is on the books
Interest at the present time. Versie Vaupel , 221 Wells Ave. N. ,
favored proposed legislation and reported possession of copy of
the Federal law enacted which will be in effect 7/79.
Recess MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Council
recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:18 p.m. All Council
Members present at Roll Call .
OLD BUSINESS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee
Surplus Fire report recommending the subject of surplus fire truck be referred
Truck to the Public Safety Committee. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE,
CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED.
Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Shane presented report (bearing
Committee Report only his signature) recommending the income level for reduced
utility rates for qualified users be set at $9,600 per annum for
Utility Rates the head of a household. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, REFER
for Senior SUBJECT TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. Councilman Shane
Citizens inquired of Deputy Finance Director Bennett re loss of revenue
to the City and was advised of $2,000 to $3,000; also that annually
City's present ordinance adjusts low-income level with Social
Security rates and reflects increases; effective 7/1/79 $5,200
for single and $7,900 for married couple. MOTION CARRIED.
Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented prog-
Development ress report noting review of Comprehensive Plan, Goals and Policies
Committee Report and referred the matter back to the Planning Department for
Comprehensive Plan inclusion of suggested changes submitted by each committee member.
Pleliminary Plat Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented
Brentwood Park committee report noting consideration of Preliminary Plat for the
Appeal of Brentwood Park Addition (PP-316-79; E-317, E-318-79) and Appeal
Decision by Bel Terra Development Corporation; property located at NE llth
PP-316-79 St. and Pierce Ave. NE; Hearing Examiner's decision dated 4/13/79.
E-317-79 The report recommended that the City Council modify the recommenda-
E-318-79 tion of the Hearing Examiner to delete Condition Ho. 1 to the
W-319-79 approval of the preliminary plat as submitted, and in all other
respects to adopt the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner,
based upon the following errors of fact and law: (1 ) Finding #6e
is in error in that the quoted ordinance sections do not require a
set back of 100 ft. in the case of undeveloped, property being
developed adjacent to a church; (2) Conclusion #8 is in error for
reasons noted above. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilman
Perry noted the church has to be 100 ft. from property line.
Councilman Shinpoch noted error in law as advised by City Attorney.
Councilman Stredicke noted protest by five adjacent property
owners at public hearing; that action reduces Queen Ave. to status
of alley and it changes the Citv's arterial street system by action
of Hearing Examiner and City Council and requested record indicate
protest. *ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: SHIfPOCH, PERRY, TRIM, PROCTOR;
3-NO: STREDICKE, CLYMER, -SHANE. MOTION CARRIED APPROVING THE
BRENTWOOD PARK ADD'N PRELIMINARY PLAT AS MODIFIED.
V+ PMENT GO MMITT EE •. -. "
`;D I30`PLANNING;:;'°ANb`..
CO
MMITTEEREPORT„
. :i
".,BRENTWOOD,'_-PARK;;ADDITION'' PRELIMINARY'::°'PLAT .AP.PEAL:
The ;Plane ng and Development Committee:, has3 considered the appeal .
of the:°:above�ment,ioned;! decision '.date.d:. April 13 :•;I9:79,: and. ,re
commend :. .
s'".;;that ahe :City�•,�Cbunc� 3:� i�iodi_fy, The::.recommendation of..,the`::'•_-
Hearing Examiner':to; :de:le.te,'„Condi,ti:on .No:. ,l ' to..,the "approval of
.the preliminary plat.; as'`..'submitted,: and.,in" all -other respects. to
eco • ���o£:'-ah�e::Heari:ng.,Examiner; . based upon" a.he ,
mmendations,
followir g:..errors:':of.''fact -.and Yaw
d nan e or i c
`n what: .the iote'd .;
�1; - ,:F>nclin o`.:+:'6`e s':"-zn'': e a• `q
sections:-do`::not:'re �uuire: a:i set:`�back`.:.of I00 feet in the .
�e-.:of.•?un•developed, _.. ' <-':' -..
��propertyr° eng:�<<_eve''' ope a jacen
-. .,._,.. , '.•to+ a church. r
•
..-.'..Conclusion. ..8." ' "'� : ::.: .w,,+;r.,,� .. , ..
-' 2 is° i�n'`;_=error;`for 'the- reasoiirs' ;:"rioted
above.
• :4
ti
1,
G:eo ge` Perry., ` Chairman /.
Barbara'.:::Shin+posh
,
Earl .Clymer
.'Y
, ... .. .,.
. rt:r
l �j�,�'� y`'`a`,
y/ „ p ] ,✓1 �, £' `T''.f ': ,�%'::....-C.rr.•C••�':,+•"�C.l%..:.i�": ^'b:...C:� "t�
•
.f r.
Y
'r�T.
�i
4
•"tom
.fir
OF R�
C.) 50 OFFICE OF THE CITY.ATTORNEY. RENTON,WASHINGTO
®/ ott POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678
aelL ` . o
C1 .� ' 4• °' LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITYATTOR6
0 CO' May 2, 1979 :�= �' +"
�9TFD SEPSEM /At34
r i
To: Members of City Council and s h� �•.N �� ,
Members of Board of Adjustmentco_ )' 45.' �� \1
From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney v�
Re: Bell Terra Preliminary Plat File No. PP 316-79 Y
The above topic has been referred to my office for comment and opinion, primarily
at the request of the Board of Adjustment.
From the facts as I now know them, St. Andrews Church was built prior to the
enactment of Ordinance No. 3101 passed and effective in January of 1977. That
Ordinance requires a church to have a setback on all buildings and structures of 100
feet from any developed residential lot. Apparently the Church had adequate property
to meet the setback requirement but has attempted, through the Platting procedure,
to divide its property, and thereby creating a situation where one of its buildings is
only 25 feet from a proposed residential lot.
If the Church's setback of only 25 feet existed at the time of construction of the
building, then the setback would be a prior non-conforming legal use. This would
require that the parcel of land proposed for development now had presently been
separated from the parcel bearing the church building. If not, the Church is attempting
to create a non-conforming use and such an attempt would clearly be a violation of
the City's zoning regulations. I might note that the setback Ordinance requires the
setback from developed lots and the lots in existence are not developed. However,
it is my opinion that to create a non-conforming use would still violate the law since
the Church is selling to a developer with knowledge that the lots will be developed
in the near future. Any violation of the law would be in the original platting and not
in the later development.
It should be noted that the City will have lost jurisdiction over the matter if the
Hearing Examiner's decision on the preliminary plat was not appealed or the particular
requirement was not called into question at an appeal.
Whether or not the property was properly split into parcels prior to the enactment of
the setback requirement in 1977 is a question that must be answered before this
problem can be resolved. The City staff is presently looking into that question and
should have an answer in the immediate near future. Pending that answer, I would
be happy to answer any questions y'O� 'ght have o his matter.
La ence . War
LJW:nd .
cc: Mayor
City Clerk. .
OF R4�
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
„ 0 z
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
oemmo ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
I. `o- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593
0,9gTE.D SEPT`*
April 23, 1979
Members, Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
RE: File No. PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, E-319-79; Belterra
Development Corporation Preliminary Plat Request.
Dear Council Members:
The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced
application was published on April 13, 1979. An appeal of Recommendation
No. 1 was received today, April 23, 1979, within the established appeal
period.
The Examiner's Report and Recommendation as well as the appeal letter
are attached for your review prior to placement of the matter on the
City Council agenda of May 14, 1979.
If you require additional information or assistance regarding this
matter, please contact our office.
Sincerely,
A ' ,:a!,„y„,„9_442e
d C'L. Rick(-Beeler
/ Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
City Attorney
Public Works Department
Attachments
pF RA
4 r
�� 7 THE CITY OF RENTON
Q .� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR e DELORES A. MEAD
CITY CLERK
�4TFO SEP.W'
April 23, 1979
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first
duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United
States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and
not a party to nor interested in this matter.
That on the 23rd day of April , 1979, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. ,
your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at
Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail ,. a true and correct
NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REGARDING
HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION OF PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79
TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD.
Delores A. Mead, City Cle k
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 23rd day-,of April , 1979.
Notary Public in and For the State of
Washington, residing in Renton
st
PARTIES OF RECORD:
Del Bennett
Belterra Development Corp.
PO Box 1282
Bellevue, WA 98009
Cheryl Henry
Belterra Development Corp.
PO Box 1282
Bellevue, WA 98009
Norman Abrahamson
3408 NE 17th St.
Renton, WA 98055
Charles & Florence Shoaf
1108 Qtieen`:Ave. NE
Renton, WA 98065
Stan Eorickson William A. Jackson
1111 Pierce Ave. NE 3508 NE 11th Pl .
Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055
Larry Kaastad Dan Nomura
1115 Pierce Ave. NE 3188 Sunset Blvd. NE
Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055
Emma Tucker
Thunder Hill Apts. #252
1206 Thomas Lane
Renton, WA 98055
4 O1 Ft
v 7 THE CITY OF RENTON
W.
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o 8' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® DELORES A. MEAD
-)3 (O CITY CLERK
0 �
AlTFO SEP-
April 23, 1979
APPEAL FILED BY: Belterra Development Corporation
12843 NE 14th P1 .
Bellevue, WA 98005
Del Bennett, President
RE: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision
dated April 13, 1979, PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79,
and E-319-79. Belterra Development 'Corporation
(Brentwood Park Addition)
To Parties of Record:
Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with
the City Clerk's Office on April 23, 1979, along with the proper fee
of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code, as amended. The
City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing.
The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will, be reviewed
by the Council 's Planning & Development Committee. Please contact the
Council Secretary, 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meeting,
if so desired.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered
by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of May 14,1979 at 8;00 P.M.
in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. S. ,
Renton.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF RENTON
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk
DAM/st
cc: Parties of Record
rw.Ir+1Fr6®a� "i` l .a•y 5) vv+ pWuvG-'r:4.r.V,.t.'.,.- 7�i . `(Y1�n ."
.CITY OF-'iRENTON to. . 8 8'6 5
. FINANCE' ;DEPARTMENT .
RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ., ' l' , - 19 7
7
RECEIVED OF �,f- _. G(�.P.c 2� .sv1��
G
// �i •
TOTAL --.2d
r
GWEN: E'. MARS , .FIN CE ,DIRECTOR
n
i'_
t
2520
Cid„
APR `v
BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ���� �
12843 N.E. 14th PL., BELLEVUE, WA 98005 aIVO
�flno
E co
phone 206-454-0539 C p
r'. C � S �A
April 20, 1979 11016 g
Mrs. Delores Mead
City Clerk
Renton Municipal Building
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision
File No. : PP-316-79
Brentwood Park Addition
Dear Mrs. Mead:
Pursuant to Section 4-3016 of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's.
Ordinance of the City of Renton, we are submitting our appeal
to the City Council for reconsideration of Item 1 of the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation dated April 13, 1979. In his report,
the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the preliminary
plat of Brentwood Park Addition subject to conditions. Condition
No. 1, which is the subject of our appeal, reads as follows:
"Revision of the southerly property line to be 100 feet from
adjacent church buildings, or approval of a variance therefrom
by the Board of Adjustment."
Section 4-706(3)(a)3 of the City's Zoning Code serves as the
basis for his decision and reads in part as follows: "(a) Such
lot or parcel of land to be used for church purposes shall, among
others, meet the following requirements: . . . 3. Setback.
Building and structures shall not be located closer than 100 feet
to any other developed lot which is zoned residential. . ."
It is our contention that this provision is not applicable in
the case of our proposed plat, as it clearly relates only to
property to be used for church purposes--not for residential
uses that may be constructed subsequent to the location of a
church in a neighborhood. At the continuation of the public
hearing on April 10, we specifically asked the Hearing Examiner
to seek an interpretation from the City Attorney's Office. In
his Report and Recommendation to the City Council dated April 13,
he concluded that a legal opinion was not necessary.
NEED COPIES TO:
v SENT
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
RECORD CHRONICLE
(PRESS)
MAYOR'S
OFFICE 7
_ CITY COUNCILd/i,,,d,
FIN 4„.2 ��
FINANCE DEPARTMENT e� �
HEARING EXAMINER
3PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ti
,PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
x PARK DEPARTMENTT/,h lcA4
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
�
c� — �CJoo.� ire;¢cc� 5
ty 6
X 11/� iJ 4._
i
Mrs. Delores Mead
Page 2
April 20, 1979
We strongly disagree with the Hearing Examiner's conclusion
on this item of his recommendation and request the Council's
reconsideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
BELIERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
( ; i. /ed.
for Del 1 ett, Presi en
I
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 13th day of April , 19 79 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
LG%
A
Subscribed and sworn this jF--day of a/4L
19 77
e2 r
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at ?eiton :.
Application, Petition or Case: Belterra Development Corp. , PP-316-79
(The minutes contain a £Lst the panties os necond)
•
April 13, 1979
OFFICE OF THE . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL.
APPLICANT: . Belterra Development Corporation FILE NO. PP-316-79,
E-317-79, E-318-79,
*W-319-79, revised to
E-319-79
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Pierce Avenue N.E. and N.E. 12th Street.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks preliminary plat approval of an 11-lot single
family subdivision. In addition, there are requests for an
exception to the Subdivision Ordinance concerning pipestem
lot, cul-de-sac length and deletion of turnaround, and a
waiver of off-site improvements.
•
SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions
RECOMMENDATION:
Hearing Examiner: . Approval subject to conditions
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on March 23, 1979.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on _file with the application, and field
checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner
conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows:
The hearing was opened on March 27, 1979 at 10:25 a.m: in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
•
' Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. •
•
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed '
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional
exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: Preliminary Plat as submitted '
•
Exhibit #3: Preliminary' Plat with staff comments
Exhibit #4: Letter to Planning Department from applicant,
dated February 21, 1979, regarding requests
for exceptions and waiver.
Mr. Clemens corrected Section M.7 of Exhibit #1 (Departmental Recommendations) which stated:
"Approval of the exception to the cul-de-sac length and provision of a minimum emergency
vehicle turnaround for Queen Avenue N.E." to read: "Approval of the exception to the cul-de-
sac length. Provision of a minimum emergency vehicle turnaround for Queen Avenue N.E. per
Section L.5 of the .Departmental Analysis." Section L.5 reviews various aspects of the
access proposal and recommends that the Hearing Examiner consider provision of a minimum
turnaround for emergency vehicles at the south end of Queen Avenue N.E.
The Examiner advised that the notice of public hearing contained in the application file
does not include reference to applications for exceptions and waiver. Mr. Clemens confirmed
that an error had occurred, thereby precluding discussion of the matters at the designated
public hearing. The Examiner also noted that procedures for preliminary and final plat
approval contained in Sections 9-1106.2 and 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance do not include
provision for a waiver of off-site improvements; however, option for application for
deferral for a period of two years is available to the applicant.. Following review of the
ordinance, Mr. Clemens concurred with the Examiner's interpretation. In view of the
substantial impact of this information, it was, agreed that the public hearing regarding
the preliminary plat would proceed, and a subsequent public hearing would be scheduled for
April 10, 1979, for the purpose of review of the requests for exception. The Examiner
asked the applicant if she concurred in the proposal to reopen the public hearing at a
later date. The applicant indicated concern that testimony may be repetitious, but
concurred in the request. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry, other parties in
attendance at the hearing also indicated concurrence. The Examiner advised that he would
proceed with testimony regarding the preliminary plat and the subject of off-site
improvements, noting a recent opinion from the City Attorney that requirement of off-site
1 [
PP-316-79 Page Two
improvements must be justified on the basis, of public health, safety and welfare.
The Examiner asked the applicant if she concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was:
Cheryl Henry
Belterra Development Corporation
P.O. Box 1282
Bellevue, WA 98009
Ms. Henry indicated general concurrence, but expressed concern regarding several
recommendations contained in Exhibit #1. Referencing Section M.2 which recommends
widening of corner Lot No. 4 to a width of 75 feet, she advised that the Subdivision
Ordinance requires that corner lots be platted wider than interior lots; however, specific
width area is not delineated within the ordinance. She advised that through a process of
utilizing a tangent and arriving at a mean average, the width of Lot No. 4 had been
established at 71.3 feet which meets ordinance requirements. Ms. Henry noted that square
footage of 9,670 contained in the lot far exceeds minimum zoning requirement of 7200
square feet, and immovable constraints of property lines created by existence of property
not owned by the applicant on the northern and southern boundaries of the site preclude :
widening the lots. She advised that a drafting error had been discovered on the plat and
lot depths of Lots 1, 2 and 3 as well as a portion of Lot No. 4 located between Pierce
Avenue N.E. and Queen Avenue N.E. total 114 feet rather than 104 feet as indicated on the
plat. Mr. Clemens designated the location of the subject lots on Exhibit #3 and confirmed
the existence of a drafting error. Ms. Henry indicated that necessary front, rear and
sideyard setbacks had been provided in conformance with ordinance requirements, and the
imposition of five additional feet on the sideyard of Lot No. 4 would not substantially
benefit the lot. She also noted that the lot width requirement for a corner lot under
King County regulations is 70 feet.
Referencing Section M.3 of Exhibit #1, which recommends provision of a 15-foot utility
easement and storm drainage provisions across Lot No. 4 from Queen Avenue N.E. to N.E.
10th Court, Ms. Henry objected to the recommendation due to the current necessity to
extend utility lines an excessive distance to connect to existing lines, and because of
potential disruption and detriment to Lot No. 4. She also felt that if other properties
are served by the proposed utilities, the cost of installation should be shared by all
property owners on a fair-share basis.
Referencing Section M.1 which recommends improvement of Pierce Avenue N.E. to the north
line of Lot A, owned by Mr. Ray Ball, Ms. Henry advised that because purchase and
development of the Ball property by the applicant is not intended, the requirement should
be modified to extend the improvements to a midway point further south, possibly adjacent
to N.E. llth Place.
The Examiner requested comments in support of the request. There was no response. He
then requested tesitmony in opposition to the application. Responding was:
Norman Abrahamson
3408 N.E. 17th Street
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Abrahamson, owner of property at 1110 Queen Avenue N.E., responding to the intention
of the applicant to develop Pierce Avenue N.E. and front proposed residences towards that
street, objected to relegation of Queen Avenue N.E. , containing five homes and a vacant
lot, to function as an alley, since it had originally been designated as a full public
street in city development plans. He also objected to application by the developer for a
number of exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance, and felt that elimination of exceptions
could occur through development of Queen Avenue N.E. which would also benefit future
development of the area. Mr. Abrahamson supported provision of a utility easement across
Lot No. 4 as well as provision of storm drainage facilities to alleviate existing drainage
problems in the vicinity of Queen Avenue N.E.
Responding was:
Charles Shoaf
1108 Queen Avenue N.E.
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Shoaf concurred in testimony provided by Mr. Abrahamson. He reiterated comments
relating to original city plans for development of Queen Avenue N.E. into a full city
street, and requested mitigation of existing drainage problems on Queen Avenue N.E.
Responding was:
Stan Eorickson
1111 Pierce Avenue N.E.
Renton, WA 98055
PP-316-79 Page Three
Mr. Eorickson supported improvement of Pierce Avenue N.E. to the northern boundary of
Lot A per the Planning Department recommendation to provide traffic safety adjacent to
N.E. llth Place. He inquired regarding limitation of access on Pierce Avenue N.E. during
construction activity, extent of improvements on that roadway, and extent of impact to
existing residents by increased traffic. The Examiner indicated that access may be
temporarily limited during construction activity and off-site improvements, if required,
must be justified by reason of public health, safety and welfare. Mr. Eorickson advised
that the existing condition of Pierce Avenue N.E. is substandard and would require
substantial improvement to bear increased traffic.
Responding was:
Larry Kaastad
1115 Pierce Avenue N.E.
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Kaastad supported provision of full off-site improvements on Pierce Avenue N.E. to a
point beyond N.E. llth Place to preclude creation of a bottle-neck and provide safety for
parked vehicles as well as emergency vehicles.
Responding was:
Emma Tucker
1206 Thomas Lane
Thunder Hill Apartments, #252
Renton, WA 98055
Ms. Tucker, purchaser of property at 1108 Queen Avenue IQ.E. , inquired regarding the extent
of pavement on the proposed pipestem Lot No. 5, and if drainage problems would occur
adjacent to her property as a result of paving. The Examiner advised that a certain amount
of run-off would occur adjacent to the paved area, but approval of the building permit
which is required prior to development of Lot No. 5 would address the specific storm
drainage details. Ms. Tucker inquired regarding location of the proposed sewer line on
the pipestem road. Utilizing Exhibit #3, Mr. Clemens designated proposed location of
sanitary sewer and storm drainage lines, which will extend around the perimeter of Lots
No. 5 and 6 southerly to N.E. 10th Court and connect to Redmond Avenue N.E. Ms. Tucker
also indicated her concern regarding disposition of Queen Avenue N.E. as an alley.
Mr. Abrahamson requested explanation of the rationale for the decision to extend utility
lines south to N.E. 10th Court rather than northerly to N.E. 12th Street, noting his
opinion that it would be more beneficial to provide utility lines in proximity to existing
residences to enable future connection.
The Examiner requested testimony from a representative of the Public Works Department.
Responding was:
Don Monaghan
Public Works Department
Mr. Monaghan was affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner reiterated Mr. Abrahamson's
inquiry regarding utility line extension to the south rather than in a northerly direction
to N.E. 12th Street. Mr. Monaghan responded that the choice of directional route would
lead him to believe that contours of the land and higher elevation of N.E. 12th Street had
effected the final determination of utility line extension to the south. Mr. Abrahamson
inquired if Mr. Monaghan's comments were fact or conjecture. Mr. Monaghan advised that
review of the plans would be necessary to verify information regarding elevations contained
within the site. Following review of the submitted plans, Mr. Clemens indicated that
contours shown on the plat designate a five-foot increase in elevation on N.E. 12th Street
from the proposed cul-de-sac. Mr. Monaghan advised that due to ground elevations and
because lines must be placed as shallow as possible, the connection to existing lines on
N.E. 10th Court was. determined most feasible. He also noted that directing lines to a
higher elevation such as exists on N.E. 12th Street would necessitate provision of a
pumping facility which is not economically feasible for the subject proposal and discouraged
by the city due to continual maintenance problems. Mr. Monaghan indicated that it is the
option of the developer to determine utility line location and in this case the route had
been chosen because there had been no other alternative available.
The Examiner requested comments from Mr. Monaghan regarding requirements for off-site
improvements for the subdivision in the interest of public health, safety and welfare.
Mr. Monaghan indicated that improvements along Pierce Avenue N.E. would be required to
the south line of the unincorporated parcel adjacent to Lot A to expedite traffic movement,.
but improvements to other access streets bordering the subject site had been referred to
the Examiner without comment. The Examiner indicated that he would require testimony to
enable him to provide a recommendation on the matter. Mr. Monaghan stated that if
improvements are determined to be required on N.E. 12th Street, Queen Avenue N.E. and N.E.
10th Court, they would consist of installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving
and lighting; however., he preferred not to comment on the necessity for'such improvements.
The Examiner requested clarification regarding whether Mr. Monaghan preferred not to comment
PP-316-79 Page Four
or required additional time to submit a recommendation in writing. Mr. Monaghan indicated
his preference to submit the departmental recommendation in writing.
Mr. Abrahamson felt that previous testimony relating to location of utility lines consisted
of conjecture, and requested further research to determine the feasibility of extension
of lines to N.E. 12th Street. He also requested further information regarding provision
of storm drainage facilities. The Examiner advised that approval of the preliminary plat
requires submittal of plans for underground sanitary and storm sewer lines as well as
details for connection to utility, systems. Mr. Clemens indicated that the information
provided within the drawings submitted by the applicant sufficiently meets ordinance
requirements.
The Examiner requested further testimony from the applicant. Ms. Henry advised that to
her knowledge, determination of utility line connection had occurred as contained in
submitted plans due to existing elevations within the plat and the city's policy regarding
installation of lift stations. She also concurred with Mr. Monaghan's statement that the
property owner has the option of determining the direction of the sewer lines. Ms. Henry
requested that. representatives from the city's Engineering Division and Traffic Engineering
Division be in attendance at the continued public hearing to further clarify the question
of installation of utility lines to serve the proposed plat, requirement of off-site
improvements, and extent of turnaround area at the end of Queen Avenue N.E.
The Examiner inquired if utility plans are normally reviewed in detail upon submittal of
the final plat. Mr. Clemens advised that plans submitted with the preliminary plat request
are intended to be sufficient to determine if the site can be adequately served by
existing utilities in the vicinity, and precise details would follow the preliminary plat.
He noted that upon submittal of final engineering drawings, these details will be reviewed.
The Examiner requested a representative from the Parks and Recreation Department to testify
regarding the intent of Section L.10 of Exhibit #1, which states that recreational space
should be acquired prior to final approval of the plat. Responding was:
John Webley
Parks & Recreation Director
Mr. Webley was affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner requested clarification of the
requirement for provision of recreational area in the vicinity prior to approval of the plat.
Mr. Webley advised that the subject site is located within Neighborhood No. 10, Sierra
Heights and Heather Downs area, as designated in the Parks and Recreation Comprehensive
Plan, adopted in March of 1978. He indicated that although the subject development does
not constitute a major impact to existing parks in the general vicinity, expanding growth
in the surrounding area has required acquisition of a 12-acre recreational site to
accommodate the increased demand. The Examiner noted that acquisition of a 12-acre site
is along-term goal, and inquired if delaying approval of the subject development was the
intent of the recommendation. Mr. Webley indicated that since the acquisition is considered
of low priority, it was not the intent to delay approval.
The Examiner requested testimony from a representative of the Utilities Division to respond
to previous inquiries regarding location of utility lines. Responding was:
Ron Olson
Utilities Division
Public Works Department
Mr. Olson was affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner reiterated previous inquiries regarding
the rationale utilized to determine connection of utility lines to N.E. 10th Court and
whether it is feasible to direct utility lines to N.E. 12th Street as an alternative. Mr.
Olson advised that the existing sanitary sewer in the intersection of Pierce Avenue N.E.
and N.E. 12th Street extends down Pierce Avenue N.E. to N.E. llth Street. He noted that
due to the elevation differences, he would assume that connection was found necessary to
the south to eliminate the necessity of a pumping station. The Examiner inquired if a
sewer line extends east of Pierce Avenue N.E. along N.E. 12th Street. Mr. Olson advised
that a sewer line does not exist in N.E. 12th Street. The Examiner inquired if finish
elevations of the roadway and location of utility lines into the plat would be required
in order to provide more definitive testimony. Mr. Olson indicated that actual elevations
had not been investigated, but he would assume that the engineer for the project would have
preferred installation of 100 feet of sewer line to the north rather than the proposed 400
feet to the south if the possibility had existed.
Mr. Abrahamson objected to Mr. Olson's use of the word "assume," and requested that
additional technical investigation be accomplished prior to finalizing the utility plans
in order to provide the most feasible plan for future development in the area, Queen
Avenue N.E. in particular.
•
PP-316-79 Page Five
The Examiner requested further comments: Responding was:
Florence Shoaf
1108 Queen Avenue N.E.
Renton, WA 98055
Mrs. Shoaf emphasized that residents of Queen 'Avenue N.E. will be greatly impacted by the
proposed development through final determination of location of sanitary and storm sewer
lines, as well as development of access roads. She indicated that Queen Avenue N.E. is
designated as a 50-foot right-of-way of which only 20 feet has been developed, and request
the Examiner's consideration of total impact of development upon existing residents.
The Examiner advised that the subject. of off-site improvements will remain open for
discussion at the continued hearing as well as the subjects of exception from the
Subdivision Ordinance. He indicated that information regarding these subjects would be
obtained from the Public Works Department prior to the meeting, and inquired if parties
in attendance objected to this procedure. There was no objection. •
The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding
File No. PP-316-79 was closed at 12:15 p.m. and continued to April 10, 1979.
CONTINUANCE:
•
The hearing was opened on April 10, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner'.
The Examiner advised receipt of a letter which was read into the record and entered as
follows:
Exhibit #5: Letter to Hearing Examiner from Norman
Abrahamson, dated March 30, 1979.
Exhibit #5 reviewed Mr. Abrahamson's requests of the proposed development,, which included
provision of storm.sewer drainage and utilities easement between the south end of Queen
Avenue N.E. and proposed N.E. llth Court; provision of restrictive covenants to limit
access. from Queen Avenue N.E. to the four lots abutting Queen; and provision of restrictiv4
covenants requiring owners of lots abutting Queen to participate in an LID at a future dab
if proposed. The letter also stated that Mr. Abrahamson's objections will be withdrawn if
the aforestated conditions are met.
•
The Examiner also entered the following additional documents into the record:
Exhibit #6: Restrictive Covenants required by rezone
of subject property; File No. R-270-78.
• Exhibit #7: Restrictive Covenants required by rezone
of northern portion of the property owned
by Margaret and Ray Ball; File No. R-083-77.
Mr. Clemens advised receipt of a memorandum from the Public Works Director which was enter(
as follows:
Exhibit #8: Memorandum to Hearing Examiner from
• Warren C. Gonnason; dated April 10, 1979.
Exhibit #8 responded to previous inquiries regarding requirement of off-site improvements
as part of proposed development, and stated the department has no objection to approval of
a' waiver on Queen,Avenue N.E. since public health, safety and welfare would not be adverse.
affected. Regarding a waiver of.off-site improvements on N.E. 10th Court and N.E. 12th
Street, because properties fronting on these roadways are not proposed to be developed as
part of the plat, the department would have no objection to granting of a waiver subject
to execution of restrictive covenants agreeing to participate in a future LID. The
memorandum advised that improvement' of Pierce Avenue N.E. north of Lot No. 1 should be
sufficient to provide for a complete intersection at this point, subject to approval of
the Public Works Department. Responding to the Examiner's request, Mr. Clemens designated
on Exhibit #3 the specific location of the proposed improvements on Pierce Avenue N.E. He
noted that the intersection at N.E. llth Place and Pierce Avenue N.E. should be completed
with full width pavement to provide safe traffic movement in the area.
The Examiner stated that•the Subject of utility line extension would require clarification
as a result of discussion at the previous hearing, and requested a representative of the
Public Works Department. to testify. Responding was:
Paul Lumbert •
Traffic Engineering Division
PP-316-79 Page Six
r. Lumbert was affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner referenced comments contained in
xhibit #8 regarding requirement for improvement of Pierce Avenue N.E. north of Lot No. 1
and requested clarification of the request. Mr. Lumbert indicated that curbs and gutters
ould be provided along Pierce Avenue N.E. to the north side of the proposed intersection
of N.E. llth Place and Pierce to expedite safe traffic flow through the intersection and
•rotect pedestrian safety beyond the proposed curb and gutter section. The Examiner
asked Mr. Clemens to review requirements for off-site improvements along Pierce Avenue
N.E. Mr. Clemens indicated that from Lot No. 1 westerly to N.E. llth Court, on-site
improvements consisting of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and paving should continue
northward to the southwest corner of Tax Lot 205. Mr. Lumbert clarified that a tapered
section would be installed in the section of roadway abutting Lot A to provide a
transition to current alignment and preclude access in the privately owned property
contained in Tax Lot 205.
The Examiner requested testimony from the applicant. Responding was:
Del Bennett
Belterra Development Corp.
P.O. Box 1282
Bellevue, WA 98009
Mr. Bennett was affirmed by the Examiner. Regarding transition of roadway section to the
existing pavement, Mr. Bennett objected to staff recommendations for tapering to the
northern boundary of 'Lot A as being inconsistent with recommendation contained within
Exhibit #8 from the Public Works Director. He advised current city requirements for
provision of full improvements to right-of-way abutting the development including curb,
gutter; sidewalk, paving, underground wiring and full utilities, and noted his intent to
provide a transition from the northern boundary Of Lot 1 to the proposed intersection of
N.E. llth Place and 'Pierce Avenue N.E. back to the existing pavement width of Pierce,
although he felt provision of full off-site improvements in the transition area would
not benefit the public. He also advised that improvements to the section abutting Lot A
would require approval of the property owner, Mr. Ray Ball. Responding to the Examiner's
inquiry regarding concerns expressed in Mr. Abrahamson's letter, Exhibit #5, Mr. Bennett
indicated his intent to mitigate current drainage problems existing at the southern portion
of Queen Avenue N.E. by extension of storm sewer system along proposed lot lines. Regarding
,proposed restrictive covenants requiring property owners abutting Queen Avenue N.E. to
participate in an LID at'a future date, Mr. Bennett indicated that he had suggested to
Mr. Abrahamson that current requirements included in an LID may be in excess of the desired
standard of improvement, and minimum provision of paving at a future date may satisfactorily.
improve existing substandard conditions.
The Examiner referenced previous discussion relating to extension of sewer lines to N.E.
12th Street in lieu of 'proposed extension to N.E. 10th Court. Mr. Bennett indicated that
various alternatives for extension were reviewed, but due to topography and required depth
for installation of the .line, the proposed location had been finally determined. The
Examiner inquired if a pumping facility would be required to extend lines to N.E: 12th
Street. Mr. Bennett responded affirmatively.
Mr. Bennett advised that although application for a variance through the Board of Adjustment
had occurred to reduce the required setback of 100 feet from the church property located
south of the site, he requested that a legal opinion be obtained to clarify the purpose
of the.requirement which he felt was imposed to protect existing single family neighborhoods
from intrusion by church construction, and not to protect church property from single
family home construction.
•
The Examiner requested comments from the applicant regarding the request for exception to
delete requirement for turnaround area. Mr. Bennett indicated that although the application
for exception had been made, it was his opinion that it was not necessary due to his intent
to preclude access onto Queen Avenue N.E. in the form of restrictive covenants included
on the face.of the plat. He also advised his opinion that responsibility for provision
Of turnaround area should be shared by those property owners who utilize Queen Avenue N.E.
for access.
The 'Examiner inquired if staff. has evaluated compliance of proposed Lot 6 with dimension
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance'. Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The
Examiner referenced Section L'.10 of Exhibit #1 regarding critical. need for recreational
space in the general neighborhood, and requested clarification of the recommendation as it
relates 'to the proposal. ' Mr. Clemens reiterated previous testimony by Mr. Webley, Parks
and Recreation Director; noting that a requirement for open space as part of the plat
approval had not been included in the Planning Department recommendation.
The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. .
Mr. Clemens indicated that the recommendation would remain as submitted with the exception ' •
of 'correction to Section M.7 of Exhibit #1, previously stated during the initial hearing.
PP-316-79 Page Seven
The Examiner requested further comments. Mrs. Emma Tucker inquired regarding procedures
for connection to proposed sewer lines. The Examiner advised that the developer should b
contacted regarding connection procedures. Mr. Bennett indicated willingness to coordina
the matter with existing residents on Queen Avenue N.E. , noting that the cost would be
borne by property owners benefiting from the extension.
Mrs. Florence Shoaf indicated concern regarding provision of a turnaround area at the end
of Queen Avenue N.E. , and inquired if sufficient dedicated property was available for tha
purpose. Mr. Lumbert indicated that 15 feet on either side of the roadway would be requi
for turnaround area, and depending upon the configuration of the roadway, the dedicated
50-foot width could possibly accommodate the proposed turnaround. Mr. Bennett indicated
that it would be logical for those residents who utilize Queen Avenue N.E. to provide
additional access and beat the cost of the improvement in conjunction with utility line
extension if desired.
Mr. Charles Shoaf stated that provision of additional access may be acquired from a
property owner located at the end of Queen Avenue N.E. to provide sufficient turnaround
for the cul-de-sac. The Examiner requested that the matter be resolved separately from
the subject application.
The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No.
PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79 was closed by the Examiner at 9:52 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS: '
1. The request is for approval of an 11-lot single family preliminary plat of Brentwood
Park Addition, together with exceptions from the Subdivision Ordinance for one pipeste
lot, 560-foot cul-de-sac, deletion'of cul-de-sac turnaround, and deletion of off-site
improvements.
2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies
and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter,
and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as
set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance
has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official
(Exhibit #1) .
4. Plans for the proposal. have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity; except for a required
sanitary sewer extension.
6. The proposal is compatible with the lot area and dimension requirements of Sections
4-706 (R-1) and 4-729 (G) of Title IV, and Section 9-1108.23 (Minimum Standards for
Residential Design-Subdivision Ordinance) , Title IX, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of
General Ordinances; except for:
a. Pipestem Lot 5 (Section 9-1108.23.F. (3) . (d) .) .
b. Queen Avenue N.E. cul-de-sac of 560 feet instead of the 500-foot maximum of
Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) .
c. Deletion of cul-de-sac turnaround at the end of Queen Avenue N.E. which is
required by Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) .
d. Deletion of off-site improvements along N.E. 12th Street, Queen Avenue N.E. ,
along Pierce Avenue N.E. north of N.E. llth Place, and along N.E. 10th Court.
e. Setback of the proposal of 25 feet from the abutting church buildings instead
of the required 100-foot setback per Sections 4-729 and 4-706. (3) . (a) .3.
f. Lot 4 is not platted wider than interior lots per Section 9-1108.23.F. (4) .
7. A variance from the setback requirement of Section 4-706. (3) . (a) .3 has been requested
by the applicant of the Board of Adjustment. A decision will be made by the board
after conclusion of this public hearing.
PP-316-79 Page Eight
8. Restrictive covenants exist on the northerly approximate 300 feet of the property as
a result of reclassifying the property to R-1 (R-083-77) which attest to participation
in an LID, for required off-site improvements such as curbs, gutters; sidewalks, street
paving, undergrounding of utilities, and street lighting. The southerly approximate
270 feet of the R-1 zoned portion of .the.property was recently rezoned to R-1
(R-270-78) and covenants completed 'requiring:
a. Subdivision of the total property owned by the United Presbyterian Church.
b. "Dedication of the easterly 20 feet of Pierce Avenue N.E. for public•right-of-way
and agreement to participate in an LID for construction of th'e required off-site
improvements is required at such time as development of the eastern 20 feet of
Pierce Avenue N.E. between N.E. llth Street and N.E. Street is possible and
required by the City of Renton.
•
9. The applicant testified that restrictive covenants for the proposal would contain
restrictions prohibiting access from the proposal to Queen Avenue N.E.
0. The Public .Works Department. staff stated that sufficient area apparently exists in the
right-of-way of Queen Avenue N.E. to develop an adequate turnaround.
11. An exception (originally requested as a waiver) was requested by the appl,icant 'of the
requirement of off-site improvements along Queen Avenue N.E. Improvements ,are proposed
along Pierce Avenue N.E. abutting Lots l. through 4 but not on the remaining northerly
portion of this street (Exhibit #3) . Also abutting the proposal is N.E. 12th Street
and N.E. 10th Court, for which off-site improvements, in addition to Queen Avenue N.E. ,
were not, proposed or recommended by staff. .
•
Regarding., off-site improvements north of Lot 1 along Pierce Avenue N.E. , disagreement
exists between the applicant and staff on how to appropriately reduce from a two-lane
to a single-lane configuration in this street (Exhibit #3) . Staff recommended tapering
from a point parallel to the northerly right-of-way line of N.E.. llth Place meeting
the easterly right-of-way of Pierce Avenue N.E. to the southwest corner of the abutting
Tax Lot 205. , The applicant offered the alternative of beginning the taper at a more
southerly point, that of the northwest corner of proposed Lot 1.
•
12. Storm drainage plans were not submitted.
CONCLUSIONS:
•
1. The proposal conforms to the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and
appears to serve the public. interest, health, safety and welfare (Section 9-1106.2.E. (2) ) .
This proposal is slightly unusual in that ,it combines two separate ownerships with a
plat between two, of another ownership and .leaves the two same ownerships at opposite
ends of the.plat.. . Some of the conflicts with the zoning regulations and Subdivision
Ordinance are a result of this situation.
•
2. The pipestem. configuration of Lot 5 appears appropriate under the circumstances of
the difficult "L-shaped" configuration of the southeastern corner of the property
(Section 9-1109.1.A) . Strict conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance would
necessitate deletion of Lot 5 of provision of dedicated public access, both of which
appear to substantially reduce the reasonable use of the property (Section 9-1109.1.A) .
Under similar circumstances other properties in the area would be entitled to the
same application for an exception, and the pipestem is a commonly used design for
solving difficult problems of property configurations (Section 9-1109.1.B) . Detriment
to the public or other properties is not apparent (Section 9-1109.1.C) .'
3. Based upon the statement of the applicant'that restrictions upon the plat would
prohibit access from the proposal onto Queen Avenue N.E. , it has not been shown that
the proposal will impact this road sufficiently to burden the applicant with off-site
improvements. Benefit to the public and interest of the public health, safety and
welfare can be shown for some improvements in this street in view of the substandard •
condition that exists. However, it has not- been clearly demonstrated that these
improvements are necessary and what specific improvements.should be required.
4. Relative to the length of Queen Avenue N.E. (beyond the 500 foot minimum of Section
9-1108.23:A. (.7) ) the 'applicant is not affecting the existing length. This
nonconforming situation can continue to exist under the established doctrine and land
use principle of nonconforming uses. 'An exception does not appear to .be required.
•
5. Since Queen Avenue N.E:. is an 'existing street that will be unaffected by the proposal
(access prohibited from the plat) an exception does not appear.required for the
turnaround.. requirement of Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) .' . A turnaround does not currently
.exist, therefore, a nonconforming situation is permitted' to continue until directly
. affected or altered by subsequent development. •
PP-316-79 Page Nine
6. Off-site improvements along N.E. 12th Street and N.E. 10th Court were not sufficient)
defined or justified to be required. However, sufficient doubt exists, due to .existi'
traffic along these streets, to preclude, a clear conclusion that a waiver should be
granted. It appears appropriate under these circumstances to allow the normal LID
process to run its course for any improvements along this street. The owners of Lot
have apparently already agreed to participate in this LID (Exhibit #7) .
7. Off-site improvements along Pierce Avenue N.E. abutting the proposal appear necessary
for safe and adequate traffic and pedestrian safety. Abutting Lots A and 1 through 4
should be constructed improvements of curb, gutter, paving, sidewalk and street
lighting. Some form of transition between these improvements and existing improvement
should occur in the to-be-dedicated right-of-way abutting Lot A. Lacking specific
design details, .it seems reasonable and logical for the Public Works Department staff
to design this transition to enhance the public health, safety, welfare and general
aesthetics. , These improvements conform to Exhibits #6 and 7.
8. Relative to the existing church buildings on Lot B, Section 4-706. (3) . (a) .3 specifical
requires a 100-foot setback from any residentially zoned lot. Between Lot 8 and the
nearest church building must exist 100 feet. Prior to, the proposal compliance with
'this requirement existed. Only as a result of the proposal is the nonconformity
produced. It is a.fundamental land use principle and doctrine that new development
cannot increase the nonconformity or create nonconformity of an existing conforming
situation. Since the proposal, by design, is creating a' conflict with zoning
'requirements the design must be revised (or varied by the Board of Adjustment) to
conform.. Due. to this very fundamental principle and doctrine, it does not appear
that a legal opinion of the City Attorney is necessary for confirmation.
9. ' Since Lot 4 does.not meet the minimum width requirements of Section 9-1108.23.F. (4)
additional width must be added to secure compliance. An exception was not requested
from this requirement.
10. The utilities serving the proposal have been designed reasonably and in response to
existing conditions. In response to Exhibit #5 the applicant agreed to provide a
storm sewer and utilities easement from the south end of Queen Avenue N.E. to the
proposed N.E. llth Court.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of Exhibit #2 subject to: •
1. Revision of the southerly property line to be 100 feet from adjacent church buildings,
'or approval Of a variance therefrom by the Board of Adjustment.
2. Placement of a restriction on the plat and in restrictive covenants, if needed,
prohibiting access of any lot to Queen Avenue N.E.
3. Installation of off-site improvements along Pierce Avenue N.E. from Lot 4 to Lot A,
tapering to existing improvements, per review and approval of the Public Works
Department according to Conclusion No. 8.
4. Widening of Lot 4 to conform to Section 9-1108.23.F. (4) per review and approval of
the Planning Department.
5. Submittal of storm drainage plans for review and approval of the Public Works
Department prior to submittal of the final plat.
6. Compliance with all other applicable ordinances and regulations of the City of Renton.
Approval of the exception to permit pipestem Lot 5.
ORDERED THIS 13th day of April, 1979.
PPIA
L. R Beeler .
Land Use Hearing Examiner
PP-316-79 Page Ten
TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of April, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties
of record:
Del Bennett, Belterra Development Corp. , P.O. Box 1282,
Bellevue, WA 98009
Cheryl Henry, Belterra Development Corp. , P.O. Box 1282,
Bellevue, WA 98009
Norman Abrahamson, 3408' N.E. 17th'St. , Renton, WA 98055
Charles & Florence Shoaf, 1108 Queen Ave. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055
Stan Eorickson, 1111 Pierce Ave.. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055
Larry Kaastad, 1115 Pierce Ave. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055
Emma Tucker, 1206 Thomas Lane, Thunder Hill Apts. , #252,
Renton, WA 98055
William A. Jackson, 3508 N.E. llth Place, Renton, WA 98055
Dan Nomura, 3188 Sunset Blvd. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of April, 1979 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Don Monaghan, Public Works Department
Ron Olson, Utilities Division
Paul Lumbert, Traffic Engineering Division
John Webley, Parks & Recreation Director
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before April 27, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error '
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen
(14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the
record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal, to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and
meeting other speficied requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for
inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased
at cost in said department.
3 .i r-fig,,.14 fN . sr .
6.S , ici �' _--�.0 A 0 4trziao
a .
0 o
DII ir) nu 0 i D. .
[ ti$1,..,,,e ] q0. 0 ‘‘ \
01tit0 0 0
gem,vAt \
us a 0 Pi° fi� El
eta_® ' r1
J 4] [30. ifEl niJ ® ClMIf$ 0 t
s
EP CI la
01 HIE Efl 0
k . \ 0
1?
D 0p , 0 ► 0 : a 0—3 r7 S'1 0 ® ' `" L° l.y
C C1 (�
ti ins° ' Ell ' o •
.3 r-Z) I:;] C:I G3 W 4 h- tt 0\ t V 0
0 ' tt .4„; \ c
R4 11 rd . 010 El 1
tato
-.3
V2..fl. F3 0 to f W -� I k.
E3 0 \
CI C=1 Cr' t 0 0 �a ' 0 iv. am4 s►"
• ue .
Nie it 0 tr
1=3 C=3 cl E3 kl (33 Z-.1 sc23 ED .4, 0 3 c& 2,0G
. ,
N8 ro r'l PL a 1ril Oa ®oris cr
D 0 El ED II D 1:3 b ea itilloVIM CI r''---" ' 0:\
1 CO 2 ® 0
6'45 1 ; ® c� �] �l 0 C3
0 Na 4 mo . 0 0
1 r y `.
0
( rm
01,0•11woot9
fa 4pj1iOt'J
i.
1 '' \. I �\ ,,tip
•
I. � t :411 I � u
1 , fil 4 Fes., .S•� • .11 • 1 .,
•
. 1) . 1 .
II . . .1}jacr
\ ( .
• , •:
' 4.........Clid1.7..11 1102
� .OII .K•i •507. " I
r
•
':/''
1111
1 I r T I.
I: ‘.....11 1 l'‘.
*t. ' 6 i\
it �•. - _J, • ' , • U uu 1
!'M 1 v n 1�4C WU�N
.'.1 'e 1.12':"Nt.,.. ,„
•
...:it�
' o ; 4.'
• "trit \ -1 , 1 ;
•\ ,ii I
1 , eI , "+ .,, .1
• • I 1 �
1 } (4 '
M' • • I 1
& ` 1.\
2 • 3 1"7
bI i _ 11 . ',� .
1 `•
• _. II I •
VI.
. '� e� 1
;,see s ‘ .
1,4.7 ; ;Tay ; •
ti 1Q. ry '• ' I `�11
...,i;i II� :-•
�v jai •
i n •
i ,
Y%' )
1� Fl W•
CCCCCC �\
1 ,).-1I 1 1 - j I r •!Y.,:eF
•
14,
E 1
Li! 1 .
1• 1.4, I , i...... ,
I�n I
t j:i' -- ..7'+dN�R.Zu.0 Et,.;'' - • -.__• -(,F 7dl._b'_S-.•,lar./
1 '+
I pLi 7 w"/ IN be,
4464 • Q- /7/9/V1/,
y BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ��F1'AR���i
12843 N.E. 14th PL., BELLEVUE, WA 98005
Y. phone 206-454-0539
February 21, 1979
Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
CITY OF RENTON
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
Re: Plat of Brentwood Park Addition/Request for Exception
Dear Mr. Ericksen:
Pursuant to Section 9-1109 of the Renton Subdivision Ordinance, this will
constitute our request for exceptions relating to the proposed Preliminary
Plat of Brentwood Park Addition, located between Queen Avenue NE and
Pierce Avenue NE in the vicinity of NE llth Street:
Pipestem Configuration for Lots '5 and 6. We are requesting approval of a
pipestem configuration for Lots 5 and 6. Our design meets the terms of
Section 9-1108 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance which outlines the
conditions under which the Hearing Examiner may approve pipestem lots.
3�74 Specifically, the subject lots contain the required area for the zoning
!1 ! r classification exclusive of the area of the pipestem; the pipestem is
less than 150 feet in length; and it is 20 feet in width. We understand---. .
that a minimum 10-foot wide driveway of permanent paving is required the
length of the pipestem together with landscaping in the area which is
not paved. We ask that the pipestem be conditionally approved so that
the required landscaping may be installed when homes are constructed on
the pipestem lots.
Cul-de-sac Length and Cul-de-sac Turnaround on Queen Avenue NE and Waiver
of Off-site Improvements on Queen Avenue NE. It was suggested to us by
City staff that we request an exception for cul-de-sac length and cul-de-sac
turnaround for Queen Avenue NE in view of the fact that our plat design
in does not provide for the connection of Queen to either NE llth Street or
any other street. We address this subject only at the staff's suggestion,
as our proposal will in no way change the existing Queen Avenue NE. At
the same time we request a waiver of off-site improvements on Queen Avenue NE.
—
RECEIVED T
CITY OF RENTON i a _ 1
HEARING EXAMINER
MAR 2 71979 ITEM NO. 7,
AM PM
71819ol0,11a1211 s2o3a4l5o6
a
Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Page 2
February 21, 1979
In his Report and Recommendation to the City Council dated October 21,
1977, pertaining to the rezone of the Ball property, the Hearing Examiner
concluded that any access to Queen Avenue NE should be discouraged due
to the narrow width of the street, which for all practical purposes serves
as an alley and access for only a few homes. Queen Avenue NE extends
southerly 550 feet from NE 12th Street, and a good portion of that right-
of-way is only 30 feet wide. Approximately 220 feet abut the proposed
Brentwood Park Addition. . Accordingly, our plat design does not provide
for any access from Queen Avenue NE. The lots have been designed to
front on Pierce Avenue NE and the cul-de-sac which will be extended into
the plat in the vicinity of NE 11th Street. Therefore, we contend that
our proposed development will in no way change the existing Queen Avenue NE
or interfere with the present access to the few homes served by this
alley. With the present configuration, off-site improvements on Queen
Avenue NE would provide no benefits whatsoever to Brentwood Park Addition.
In fact, the improvement of Queen Avenue NE would create an undesirable
and detrimental "frontdoor/backdoor" access situation for the lots in
Brentwood Park Addition.
In conclusion, we believe that the granting of the above exceptions will
not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property
in the vicinity, and are necessary to insure our property the rights
and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the neighborhood and under
similar circumstances. The configuration of the property is such that the
strict application of the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance would
prevent the reasonable use and development of the property.
Sincerely,
/-BEIL-'rERRA DEVE OPMENT CORPORATION
A/
Sheryl Hen - 717/1---
Vice Presaderit -� -Administration
I
•
March 30, 1979
To: Hearing Examiner (R. Beeler)
Regarding the proposed development from Belterra Development Corp. ,
(file #PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, W-319-79, Brentwood Park Add)
as it affects the future of Queen street. Due to the shallow depth
of the property, there is no obvious way that Pierce and Queen can
bathe "front" for the houses located between. Mr. Bennett, the
developer, proposed some-things at a meeting with me on 3/28/79,
which I feel would minimize adverse effects to Queen street should
you decide to approve the plat as proposed.
These are the things which I feel should be required:
a) Storm sewer drainage and utilities easement between the
south end of Queen street and proposed N.E. llth Court.
b) Restrictive covenant to limit access from Queen street to
the four lots which abut Queen street.
c) Restrictive covenant requiring owners of the lots which
abut Queen street to participate in an LID if and when
one is proposed.
If these conditions are met, I will withdraw my objections.
RECEIVED 91/709/4e,-,/e. dditodP-Aer
CITY OF RENTON Norman Abrahamson
HEARING EXAMINER 3408 N. E. 17th Street
n rI, 1 01979 Renton, Washington
AM PM
ft
EXHIBIT 1�O 5 • 1REC li/ D
ITEM NO. /9,-/6- 79 CITY OF RENTO
HEARING EXAMINER
APR 21979
AM Purl
71 g 19,10.11112.l 1213l415.6
Planning Department • CB lterra::Co p rat1ori
'� 't=21,0 ..84• '
RECEIVE
CITY OF REP
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS HEARING EXAM
•
•
•
WHEREAS, James Vanderway, a single man, is the owner of the following real n PR 1 19a
AM
property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington; and Belterra 7i8t�,f0i11mlik` i
Dikevelopment Corporation; Delbert C. "Bennett, President,_ has contracted to purchase
the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of
Washington, described as follows:
• That,portion of'the East of the East 5 of the Northwest Isof the
Northeast 4 of Section '9, Township 23 No •rth, Range 5.East', W.M., in
▪ King County., Washington, lying northerly of N.$'. 10th Court, EXCEPT EXHIBIT
I\O
▪ the North 700 feet'of the East 4 thereof and EXCEPT the North 591
feet of the West 12 thereof. EXCEPT an 18-foot strip adjoining Lot 8'ITEM
Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2, Albert Balch's President Park No. 12. NO ��c
EXCEPT that portion lying South of the Easterly extension of the
North right-of-way line of N.E. 10th Place.
WHEREAS, the owners and purchasers of said described property, hereinafter
"the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with
the land as to use, present and future; of the property;
NOW THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish, grant
and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the
land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their
successors, heirs and assigns, as follows:
• COMPLETION OF SUBDIVISION
Approval of the rezone of the property is subject to completion of the appropriate
subdivision of the total property owned by the United Presbyterian Church whereby
the subject property is created.
ROADWAY DEDICATION AND
INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE It3PROVEMENTS
Dedication of the easterly 20 feet of Pierce Avenue N.E. for public right-of-Way and
agreement to participate in an L.I.D. for construction of the required off-site
improvements is required at such time as development of the eastern 20 feet of Pierce ,
Avenue N.E. between N.E. llth Street and N.E. 12th Street is possible and required
by the City of Renton.
DURATION
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any
time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the
covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the .
Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity for further
documentation.
Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by
either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are
adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants.
Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne
by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a
judgment in such action.
( ' ' 7
'dames 'Vanaerway, Owner
•
Be errs Develo
pment C oration, by
Delbert C. Bennett, President,
Purchaser
•
• STATE OF WASHINGTON) •
COUNTY OF KING
On this „.2? day of ;.,�ti 19
j , before ma personally appeared
James Vanderway, the person, and Delbert C. Bennett to be known to be the President of
the Belterra Development Corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said person and
corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath Mr. Bennett
stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument for said corporation, and
that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation.
Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
,4�)Nota ublic in and fgith,7St�e
of Washington, residing in,te,,
J
_�P�li,aC� •
-2-
--- a rAt-L:r-&=-Ray'_ i;-:-Ball-e75r,
RECEIVED
DECLARATION air eESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CITY OF RENT ON
HEARING EXAMINER
MESAS, Ray S. Sall, Sa. and hie wife Margaret L. Dall are the owners of the PM
AM PR 1979
following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, state of Washington, 71S19110111,I211,213141516
described as follows:
All that portion of Section 9, Townehip 2311, Range 5E, W.M. described ae
follows; The North 591 foot of the Nest 1/2 of the Cant 1/2 of the East
1/2 of the E9srthwest 1/4 of the Corthacst 1/4 of paid Section 9.
MMESEAS, the o nsrs of said described property, hereinafter 'the plrcporty,'ExHIB T 7
desire to impose the following restrictive covenant] running with the land as to •
me, preccmt and future, of the property: ITEM
/flvl NO.. /Z�G
KOM , the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose
1 1`
restrictions'and covenants running with the land an to use by the usedoroignod,
their ssrccescars, heirs and assi.gass, as follows:
INSTALLATION CI err-SITS navamenerrs
The test 20 feet of the I?arth 210 feet off the property shall be dedicated to the
City of Renton for the purpcee of public access upon demolition or removal of the
existing building within the heroin described westerly 20 foot.
The owners of the above described property, their successors, heirs and assigns,
hereby agree and covet to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and
accept any Local Improvement District (LID) or city initiated proposal, and pay
their fair and equitable share therefore, for the purposes of providing the
necessary off-mite inprovcsents required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance.
•
Said iaprovegents shall ir1ude but may not be limited to the installation of
curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving, undergrounding of utilities, and street
lighting.
STORM DRAINAGE
Storm drainage plane shall be approved by the Public Morko Department, City of Renton,
according to requirements of applicable ordinances and policies of the City of Renton,
and, if possible, to the effect of reducing water pending on Queen Avenue M.E. under •
reasonable obligations to the owners of the above described property.
DUPATION
•
These covenants shall run with the land and expire on Deconber 31, 2025, provided all
of those covenants aro fulfilled and completed in accordance herewith. Any violation
or breach of theca restrictive covenants nay be enforced by proper legal procedures
In the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any other property
owners adjoining described property who are adversely affected by said breach.
Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne
by the party or parties whom the court determines is in error and shall be entered
as a judgement in such action. •
(4)914--, •
y N. , Dr.
•
sThea
Margaret hall
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
COUNTY OF KING
On this A/dny of s'. l l�7 , 197 before me personally appeared
,c
Q24Y-
the rsons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persona for the uses
and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set cry hand and affixed my.official seal
the day and year first above written.
//; (4;e..e.:0_-/Lc- •
Nota /Public in and for.t11o/9tat
of Wa hington, residing at��TT.
•
.
t
11 dy/
-2-
OF I
o� z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
WARREN' C. GONNASON, P.E. • DIRECTOR
°' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
9A `O 206 235-2569
O �P
9�TFD SEP- `°
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI
MAYOR April 10, 1979
TO: L. Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner
FROM: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Brentwood Park Addition PP-316-79
This is in response to your desire for comment on the applicant's
request for a waiver of off-site improvements for Queen Ave. NE.
We would not object to the granting of a waiver of off-site improve-
ments on Queen Ave. NE as the public health, safety and welfare
would not be adversely affected if said waiver were granted.
In the event that the applicant wishes .to have the off-site improve-
ments on NE 10th Street and NE 12th Street waived in view of the
fact that the properties fronting on 10th and 12th are not a part
of his proposed improvement but will be included in the final plat,
we would have no objections to the granting of said waiver subject
to restrictive covenants providing for future improvements and
participate in L.I.D. 's for said improvements. Public health, safety
and welfare would not be adversely affected if said waiver were
granted with the stated conditions.
The improvement requirements for Pierce Ave. NE north of lot #1
should be sufficient to provide for a complete intersection at this
point and said improvements shall be subject to the approval of the
Public Works Department.
WCG:ad
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
AIR 1 ® 1979 EXEC fIT NO g
A718 9 f JI 12 C P6 ITEM NO. -. i _ ��7
` Ic71a711019911G91a; :�i''2+9P�
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 271979
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER AM PN
718191101111120 t2s31415if
PUBLIC HEARING
MARCH 27 , 1979
EXHIBIT NO, /
APPLICANT : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . ITEM NO. r/--,6/( -7 9
FILE NO : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , E-318-79 , W-319-79 (BRENTWOOD
PARK ADDITION )
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
The applicant seeks preliminary plat approval of an 11 -lot single
family subdivision . In addition , there are requests, for an exception
to the Subdivision Ordinance concerning pipestem lots , cul -de-sac
length and deletion of turnaround , and a waiver of off-site improve-
ments . (Site development map attached . )
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owners of Record : JAMES VANDERMAY & RAY BALL , SR.
2 . Applicant : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP .
3 . Location : Southeast corner of Pierce Avenue
(Vicinity Map Attached ) N . E . and, N . E . 12th Street
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description , is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department.
5 . Size of Property : ±4 . 76 acres
6 . Access : Via N . E . 12th Street and Pierce
Avenue N . E .
7 . Existing Zoning : GS- 1 , General Classification District ;
R-1 , Residential Single Family
8. Existing Zoning in the Area : ' GS-1 , R- 1
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential
10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date . Notice
was properly published in the Record
Chronicle on March 16 , 1979 and posted
in three places on or near the site as
required by City ordinance on March
14 , 1979 .
C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND :
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1965
dated May. 27 , 1959 . That portion of the plat proposed for 7200
square foot 'lots was rezoned by Ordinance #3288 of March 5 , 1979
and Ordinance #2650 of August 11 , 1971 .
D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : .
1 . Topography : The site is relatively level .
2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material , (AmC ) . Runoff is medium,
erosion hazard is moderate to severe . This soil is used for urban
development . .
3.' Vegetation : The site consists of a mixture of deciduous trees ,
blackberries and grass undergrowth .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY ,:REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79
MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79
PAGE TWO BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION
4. - W;il,dlf'e : Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat
for birds and small mammals .
5. Water : No ,surface water was observed on the subject site .
6 . Land Use : An existing single family residence is located in the
northerly portion of the subject site and St . Andrews United
Presbyterian. Church is found in the south part . The property
adjacent to the east consists of developed single family
residences as are the lots to the west. To the north is a
parcel of undeveloped single family zoned property and a single
family subdivision.
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The surrounding properties are principally single family residential
in nature .
F . PUBLIC SERV.ICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : Existing 6" water mains are located on the
N . E . llth Street , N . E . 10th Place , N . E . 10th Court and Pierce
Avenue N . E . 8" sewer mains are located along Pierce Avenue
N . E . and N . E . 12th Street and a 6" sewer main is located on N . E .
llth Street. In addition , an 8" storm drain is located on Pierce
Avenue N . E . at N . E . llth Street . Development of the property will
require extension of water and sewer utilities .
2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance
requirements .
3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along N . E . 12th
Street adjacent to the subject site .
4. Schools : The site is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary
School , within three-quarters of a mile of McKnight Junior High
School , and within two miles of Hazen High School .
5 . Recreation : The existing Kiwanis Park is located approximately
one-half mile south of the subject site .
G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
1 . Section 4-706 , R- 1 , Residence Single Family .
2 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District .
H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT :
1 . Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1106 ; Preliminary Plat Require-
ment.s .
2 . Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1105 . 66 ; Waived Improvements .
3. Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1109 ; Exceptions .
4. Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report , 1965 , Objective 6 , page 18 ;
and .Residential , Page 11 .
I . ;IMPACT ON THE NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT :
1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will disturb
soils , remove vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an
effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper
development controls and procedures , however , these impacts can be
mitigated .
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 ,
MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79
PAGE THREE BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION
2 . Population/Employment : The proposed plat of 9 new lots will
increase the population by approximately 32 persons (-3 . 5 persons/
home times 9 homes ) .
3 . Schools : The proposed plat will increase the school population by
approximately 5 students ( . 5 students/home times 9 homes ) . These
new pupils are likely to be scattered throughout the grades and
not significantly impact the existing services .
4 . Social : Increased opportunity for social interaction will result
from development of the subject site .
5. Traffic : The new subdivision will increase traffic in the area by
approximately 90 trips per day ( 10 trips/unit times 9 new units ) .
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : ;
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C , a negative
declaration of environmental impact has been issued for the subject
proposal
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS. CONTACTED : (See Comments . Attached )
1 . City of Renton' Building Division .
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division .
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division .
4. City of Renton Utilities Division .
5 . City of Renton: Fire Department.
6. City of Renton Parks Department .
7 . Renton School District No . 403 (no response received) .
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ;
1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and zoning designations of single family residential use of the
site and surrounding area .
2 . The proposed plat is consistent with the adjacent single
family uses and nearby subdivisions .
3. The proposed lots range in size from 7380 square feet to
73 , 250 square -Feet for the remaining church area and are
consistent with the minimum lot size requirements of the R-1
and GS-1 zones . These lot sizes are also `compatible with the
Studebaker ' s Addition to the west and the lots to the east
on Queen Avenue N . E .
4. The proposed plat will reduce the existing - setback of the church
buildings to 25 ' which is below the 100 ' minimum required
by the GS- 1 District. The applicant has requested a variance
application approval from the Board of Adjustment. Approval of
this plat should include the requirement for approval' of said
variance of modification of the plat to conform to the setback .
5 . The proposed plat will leave Queen Avenue N . E . as a cul -de-sac
exceeding the minimum length allowed by the subdivision ordinance ,
and not providing for the required 45 ' radius. turnaround . The
applicant by his letter of February 21 , 197.9 has requested
exceptions to allow the over length cul -de-sac and delete the
required turnariound . Further a waiver of the street improvements
for this street has been requested .
The applicant states that the proposed plat is not oriented
to Queen Avenue N . E . and will therefore have no effect on this
portion of the street. Subject to a vehicular access restriction
to Queen Avenue N . E . , this appears to be the case . Development
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 ,
MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79
PAGE FOUR BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION
of the plat as proposed does insure a long-term cul -de-sac ,
however , no adverse comments from any departments were received .
The Hearing Examiner should consider provision of a minimum
turnaround for emergency vehicles at the south end of Queen Avenue .
6. The applicant' s request for waiver of the off-site improvements
is addressed to Queen Avenue N . E . only , however, as noted by the
Engineering Division , the waiver should also address N . E . 10th
Court , and N . E . 12th Street . All three streets , due to their
location or lot design to not appear to be directly effected
by any additional traffic movements as a result of this plat .
Only the Engineering Division directly addressed this request ,
and refers the matter to the Hearing Examiner without comment.
However , future improvement of N . E . 10th Court and N . E . 12th Street
should be insured by adoption of restrictive covenants . All
normal street improvements (curb , gutter , sidewalk , storm
drainage , paving , etc . ) should be included .
7. Improvements to Pierce Avenue N . E . are proposed only on lots 1
through 4 , and not including across lot A at the intersection
of N . E . llth Place . In order to assure the public health , safety ,
and welfare all street improvements (curb , gutter , sidewalk ,
storm drainage , paving and street lighting ) shall be extended
to the northerly limit of Lot A. Without said improvements
the increased traffic at N . E . llth and Pierce intersection will
create the potential for impaired traffic safety .
8. The applicant has requested exceptions to the subdivision
ordinance to allow pipestem lot arrangement for Lots 5 and 6 .
The proposed lot 5 conforms to the 20 ' by less than 150 '
criteria established by ordinance . Lot 6 does not appear to be
a pipestem lot. Lot 5 should be approved as it will have no
apparent adverse impact on the general public .
9 . Lot 4 , a corner lot, is not platted wider than the adjoining
interior lots . The lot should be widened such that the average
width is at least 75 ' (about 10 ' additional width to the north ) .
10. The Parks Department indicates a critical need for recreational
space in this general neighborhood . Recreational space should be
required prior to final approval of the plat (see memo attached ) .
11 . Approval of the plat should be subject to final plan approval
for street storm drainage and utility improvements and provision
of a utility easement and storm drainage provisions from Queen
Avenue N . E . to N . E . llth Court .
Additional comments of other departments are attached for
consideration .
M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval subject to :
•
1 . Improvement of Pierce Avenue N . E . to the north line of Lot A
per analysis #7 . Privision for future improvement of Pierce
Avenue by L . I . D . is provided by covenant dated February , 1979 .
2 . Widening of Lot #4 to 75 ' width .
3. Provision of a 15 ' utility easement and storm drainage provisions
across lot 4 from Queen Avenue N . E . to N . E . 10th Court .
4. Final approval of street, storm drainage , and utility plans by
the Public Works Department prior to installation of the
improvements .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , Files No : PP-316-79 , E-317-79
MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79
PAGE FIVE BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION
5 . Approval of a variance of the minimum building setback
ordinance for the Methodist Church or revision of the plat
to comply with the setback .
6 . Approval of the exception to allow pipestem ' lot arrangement
for Lot 5 .
7 . Approval of the exception to the cul -de-sac length ,-ad
provision of a minimum emergency vehicle turnaround for
Queen Avenue N . E . �,.t4j .
8 . Approval of the waiver of off-site improvements for Queen
Avenue N . E . , and, approval of a waiver subject to covenants
for future improvement of N . E . 12th Street and N . E . 10th
Court.
....._
1)114
i vv
. .
NOLU44V1
't 600P) ,,.: 1 :'10 , I
/
,, , . , g .,. _ . ‘,,,,,, i
1�J j I i�l s. r ,"T,�� a , _
0
•
;��� � se �,,,...r
1 4- 5 j
:,
,-,-,
,„
..„
u 1 i 1:3 -
•
Si
(Jt11 Wo: g� t id t1100 �N
AIL El t B i 0 t tifi
, I . E3 1:3 ra 0 roi= CDi CI C
t
__03 pit
0 • 7/, ct, A)m; 1 gs,- 1 0 ,„ ;
4 4. \ 4 ir '..,.t.2..14'..fettesz „... '`
1 0 II ; airy BI '`
,cf; gall Div ® - t, x,., , m/ ® ® 1. Ci CO .NM C
d ANC
k \ 1111 In i .4 t 0 tuc. . ...
, tA
i uj r
8PL :: °pro
1 -7t 0 „,
, ,. A - 744 CO C3 In C3 C
0 3 ‘... V )
..
3\ '‘-
\,,, ' % 0 ,,,t
1 al
0 1% 11 \ )1
��J ' .t.
10 t" 1
Ci ri ,
. \ 11
\ 0 1 1 f , A
t„
\ , 1.--.5 7 .
. i
) a ciewn \ ED ,?zi
a ' 0: * oca
Pat ®a°� 0 , @II v'i � a b snr palm'
'il
t
1 � ,\ 1 0 ri 0 61 0
( 2troAuf71 '''
1
is
I No- 0 'i
ca Q " p
•
a°5-9
. . tk== es r fs ) 0
a f 1
.., . ..
\ ;\
I 41,,,,,,
• .,04.01 .a'"
---..-----•
•
Aj"'42"c?X1.-----
I I i • \ ..
I i t . M• .
I 14 •
1 4, \\
1
( I i •
,
• I i• ,
•i• \ N1.'4 "I
I.
..,
I \ I i I '1% II . .0
t d . •
.
,
7 ,i • ' .
i 1 ii
\ J49, ft,,mrgi.7 4)......L. . in:d7.7;7:
- --
ftv
....,,,
.tiv \--- f
,
, , rs • . 1 -- , . ,. .
, s -
' 1 " ; -i;
'.. .• 1 so '.:4,, $ , , gi ' '' 1
,
. ' „cs‘ ll '10 ' '•. •, 4 \,.....,:i , .,/, / : es,
g s. s. ••• k•- i 4-r--1.
•
.......... i ,, • .„ .1)
.. . • . ..'1 ;1.1.i. ., . •
•cli N ' , '' .2,j
; ' -''''''' •1 ‘ Qi) 't
4 s 0 i..i.7 .. a..,;i:,.r;e- 'j°' ,• t; i' i 1 2
., , —
• ..•...VW/0
I 0 w:i
e4, • ---'''•• .• - .. ••-----?; i...r.z
,, ,14: i...... ,
, ,.... . . .4.1,4 ,,
. ' ,4: • ft,„ , ..."-.1i2•',..,V'i i .,,' •.!:).11,
:.>.\ •
-kW , •,•., r-,
, ,...., . .. ,,,. ,:.... , ..,„...
. . .„.„... ,,, ..
..lft 0 . . . ' -. -- -• I
6.7A -„, art . k '• ,, .-- 14
. ,
, • , 1 e, • 1 LI
! MioW.1.1 ! 14 ' '. I 4
. .. I. ,
.
--------L.—--, 1. I.
1
. , 1; ,1 . 1 I
.i4 I i? ',..;1 1 1
1—._........---1
4,,N.
' , • i
b g ‘ ! 41' ‘i
. .
.. ; 1
• 1
...01 .. , , 1
....._.._........
0 1
..,, . . ,: I
,b h • q 1 • • 1 1
.a v D . • \
k e.
•
S :3 • ,. - .. 'iti' ,1 d'
* P Z1‘ :•L` 4 t 1 •1 .14,/
1
i.-....
. . . .
.7 \Iti..„:‘, •G 41-. -
t`41 i ix' .19//IN
1 -
.‘.i• '1 :11•1
---- ' •!9..1. ,
,
• :
.'
,i i ' i
I-• ill I
• ll S
•.% - 1 I
' .....
ilf% , I
H.
1..., .
Ii .,.
..ii .
,_. , 1
,picl,
,(4., .73 ,-,
1 .
t•"'4.‘ IS '..--"s.1 /ell I
.1q .,L. . •
f•4 ,
]
',1 •V'
\ ,
, s:
k ,i i
,.. ...1
,_.,...•.
4;k ii•e I.t! / litti
tti
_'•il.it'l . i it%
. uti
I
. I "
.
. . •
.
, ‘
I I
1 , •••
It/. ' •
.'• r (11 CCikrie
N
9
.
oP r-• -7.y...),....8 ..$7,.-
. pi...." ---- - - ----. -
4 - .
iAl )
•
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: Q. Finance Department
Fire- Department
Library Department
® Park Department
8/ police_ Department
Public Works Department
(:) juilding Div.
engineering Div . (Please verif legs) descrip n)
= ' Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his 2gn/eg.;
fri / /
DATE: 0/49
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
APPLICANT : / W'4 i'ii4wié
LOCATION `., �,✓ �'' /
(
APPLICATION S) : /�, &/./l f rir
?/9-4.
ge 7 /4"1 .W W1
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING- . I�
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : ,";;'/ / /
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department: -�-
EM Approved Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
Nr-el ‘,..e.--a/14-Z-•%,- L'J defr1/--
N5 A -Cov,,az- N. ".` .sve
X0(771
-1�§lgnature of Direcior or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: (2) ' Finance Department
8' . Fire Department
Library Department
® Park ,Department
Police Department
® Public Works Department
® Building Div.
E gineering Div. (Please verify legal description)
e Traffic Engineering Div.
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or,
his 2;Fet:
//) 15r5 DATE : 0*
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT: Agie
LOCATION:
d!
APPLICATIONS : ' t.��� 1/7/4145'26
( )
_"/ r,0 i1. 4 •*eti, i r iz p 0/g- W/ .✓✓I eogee- /9y- r.
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING • ; IN'�
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BY : AO /6 4/ 7
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : Te mFoec EWE,®°'ksesee# '(
EC Approved Cn Not Approved.
Comments or conditions :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: ® Finance Department.
8 Fire Department
Library Department
® Park Department
Police Department
® Public } rks Department
Building Div .
OEngineering Div . (Please verify legal description )
Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Departments ( signed by responsible official or
his d igne ie
�/�/�
�� V DATE : / 4
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
APPLICANT :
LOCATION : L 40/, ` '
APPLICATION(S) • A' 44
0
6e#0.7-0-71 iffi5101 ,•4e -,- 411V Ve- Alle-ve ogee- ?,<9.7,
„ - - A0freaoddie*
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING INL
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :: "i,JJ� /4 /I
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY >DEPARTMENTS :
Department : C., ,_1 ) -�
Co_Approved Not Approved
mments or conditions :
S
( (
Signature of-"Director 'or Authorized Representative Date
///
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : ® 'Finance Department
e Fire Department
41 Library Department
/7 Park Department
" Police Department
/ Public Works Department
0
Building Div.
0 Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description )
/,Traffic Engineering Div .
\, _. £/d - -i Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or
his d igne
ie
4!ri 61/5 DATE : 9/09
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
. �� �� �.
APPLICANT : __ 0/1 �'" 4l
LOCATION : f - I. /+ '
APPLICATI0N(S) �i" 111:'/if ; e hl /fflr% ALL'
' / / ''`'. 0 7
9)
6,6 1 t 1 1 41947 71 IA • . •#/ 0. ..511 '''' 9/9-4.
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING V, IN."
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : ioor ,/,
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : e
,E1 Approved Not Approved
Comments or conditions : �,
I) Ca"' r 'd F,re }.\..�c{rc0INtf (Sk� II ke 1rNs7il!ed clod veuc�y Co IQ
Lk se, 0}-eolO LS To ClYlL.+ loI,�% 1c ),Nci CohS Y'Ltc Toll .. Lk)a -kV` ik, cfI}�
51zes cir.Ci 1r, Sri1IctI i,ui� LA
rtciIit►r-ec-I 6L1 v.Nct"1er u OA 7esr .
4' p 1,3 cu? C0 3 - 1 -2_ - 7
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : (TRL ,T r'
Approved En Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
I-)/tw1,2,c urk ,r.its P -. C.' S Part c r-, sr►is
i 1p , 4.....,,s.1T9.c .t SI$w,dil STe7. C1-1G5
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
®? kt.4 �
® THE CITY OF RENTON
xtin MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
A -I " ", CHARLES J. DELAURENT0,NIAVOR 0 PARKS and RECREATION
Yea (of
JOHN E. WE®LEY - DIRECTOR
44,
SEA
RENTON PARK DEPARTMENT
BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development, in itself, does not constitute a major impact
on our Parks & Recreation system. However, several such actions have
recently occurred in this planning area and cumulatively provide a
significant impact. Kiwanis Park is located in this area and provides
a substantial recreational land base, however, it is not sufficient to
handle the total service area. According to the City's' Comprehensive
Park and Recreation Plan, the #2 and #3 acquisition projects for the
City lay north and south of this development (#1 and #2 on a neighborhood
basis) . The impetus to acquire a site in the Sierra Heights area is
absolutely critical.
•
•
•
PROPOSED/FINAL i.)L..CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE .N-SIGNIFICANCE
Tentative Plat
Application No . 285-79 PROPOSED Declaration
•
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-4?7-79 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Applicant proposes a 9-lot single family
subdivision (proposed Brentwood Park AdditionL_____�._.
Proponent BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Location of Proposal Between Queen Ave. N.E. and Pierce Ave. N.E. in
the vicinity of N.E. 11th Street.
Lead Agency RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is
[� is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : _
This declaration of non-significant impact is subject to provision of
appropriate development measures and standards to mitigate any potential _
adverse environmental effects , and subject to the modifications proposed.____
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final )
declaration of non- significance : —
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title Planninc{ Di Actor Date February 8, 1979
Signature
City of Renton
Planning Department
(// � 5-76
n
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 10 , 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1. BEL TERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP. (BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION) ,
APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH AND DELETION
OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, Files
E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79; property located in
the vicinity of N.E. llth and Pierce Ave. N.E.
2. THE AUSTIN COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO
FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE, File SP-321-79; property
located east of FAI-405, west of Lincoln Ave. N.E. ,
in the 1700 block of N.E. 44th Street.
3. C.H.G. INTERNATIONAL, INC. (EARLINGTON WOODS) , APPLICATION
FOR PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL, File MP-PUD?178; APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO
ZONING ORDINANCE RE. PARKING, File E-244-78; AND
APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO ZONING ORDINANCE RE. DENSITY,
File E-243-78; property located at Hardie Ave. S.W. between
Sunset Blvd. W. and Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way.
Applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning
Department.
•
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON April 10, 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED March 30. 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
TEVE UNSDN , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABM DOCUMENT WERE PA�QQSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIEVA' AB'(IvE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST : Subscribed an;d, sworn
to before me, a Notary, Public ,
on the 28th dayof ri��j
19 ` ', SIGNED Ita2.42)144-,"a...4->n,
OFA.
6 © z THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTO .WASH.90065
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT
01 Q• 235- 2550
'.11Tto serf
March 23, 1979
Belterra Development Corporation
12843 N.E. 14th Place
Bellevue, Washington 98005
RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS
TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC
LENGTH AND DELETION OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS,
Files E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79; property located in
the vicinity of N.E. 11th and Pierce Ave. N.E.
Dear Sirs :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on March 5, 1979 . A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for April lfl, 1g74 at 9:00 a.m.
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550.
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Ericksen
Planning D 7.ctor
By: �C
vid R. Clemens
Associate Planner
cc: Eastside Consultants, Inc.
James Vandermay
Ray Ball , Sr.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 10 , 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1. BEL TERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP. (BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION) ,
APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH AND DELETION
OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-$ITE IMPROVEMENTS, Files
E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79; property located in
the vicinity of N.E. 11th and Pierce Ave. N.E.
2. THE AUSTIN COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO
FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE, File SP-321-79; property
located east of FAI-405, west of Lincoln Ave. N.E. ,
in the 1700 block of N.E. 44th Street.
3. C.H.G. INTERNATIONAL, INC. (EARLINGTON WOODS) , APPLICATION
FOR PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL, File MP-PUD-78; APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO
ZONING ORDINANCE RE. PARKING, File E-244-78; AND
APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO ZONING ORDINANCE RE. DENSITY,
File E-243-78; property located at Hardie Ave. S.W. between
Sunset Blvd. W. and Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way.
Applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning
Department.
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON April 10, 1979 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS .
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED March 30, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
COPI
OF THE ABOVEVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BYHBY MEEIIN THREECERTIFY CONSPICUOUSTHATEPLACESS
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIOD ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST : Subscribed a•nd;sworn
to before me, a Notary Public ,
on the 28th day of NlarIch 19 79 SIGNED ��
�
. NOTICE
THIS PROPERTY
GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS:
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF N. E. 11TH AND PIERCE AVENUE N. E.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE
RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF
,A • PUBLIC HEARING
TO BE HELD
IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
ON APR L 10, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9:QO A.M.
P.M.
CONCERNING ITEM [J1
■ REZONE
■ SPECIAL PERMIT
■ SITE APPROVAL
■ WAIVER
IISHORELINE
MANAGEMENT PERMI1
APPLICATION F(R- EX('FPTTUNS Tn THE S RnTvicin RDI'NANCE REGARDING. PIPE-
STEM LOTS, CUI,-DE-SAC LENGTH AND DELETION OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-SITE
MPROVEMENIS (BE TER DE ELO M NT ORP--BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION)
t-ILE NOS : t-317-/9, h-318-/9, L-519-�I9
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
•
CITY OF RENTON
SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. "A1/45/6 -
MAJOR PLAT G1 �t \, DATE REC' D,
TENTATIVE // \ (,C�FI'I�'p� (),1‘
� APPLICATION FEE $ 5.5 'oo
x PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL MN 5 10rU } REVIEW FEE $
\ .___.... C// RECEIPT NO.4'7 ��
� SM NO.
UEn�' � PUD NO .
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 :
1 . Plat Name & Location Brentwood Park Addition, N. E . llth & Pierce Ave . , N .E.
2 . No. Lots 11 Total Acreage 4 . 76 Zoning R-72
3 . Owner Bel Terra Development Corporation Phone 454-0539
Address 12843 N. E. 14th Place , Bellevue, Washington 98005
5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed
Telephone ( x ) ( ) ( )
Electric ( x ) ( ) ( )
Street Lights ( x ) ( ) ( )
Natural Gas ( x ) ( ) ( )
TV Cable ( x ) ( ) ( )
6 . Sanitation & Water:
( x ) City Water ( x ) Sanitary Sewers
( ) Water District No . ( ) Dry Sewers
( ) Septic Tanks
7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance .
8 . DATE REFERRED TO:
ENGINEERING PARKS
BUILDING HEALTH
TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY
FIRE COUNTY PLANNING
BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER
9 . STAFF ACTION:
TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED
APPEALED EXPIRED
10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION:
SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS :
DATE DATE BOND NO. AND
TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT
Planning Dept .
Rev. 1/77
_ _ . (0-s1 c)pN
•
q.V=1,\ .
AFF I DAV I T . (-TY ✓�� • Q '>>
..,----7 \.:., .,.
\ 0
TAC:
Ie L�j7(.1.cQ� r>�.1; /714--1 l z / , being duly sworn,6deClarec' that I
am /the owner of t e property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers 'herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me ,✓�
this /1 day of, ,-c4�s , 19 % ,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at �j.�.%i�i? . �,
1 / ) /
7 ' 2--/'
/ ' /
(Name of Notary ,Public) (Signature of Owner) ;/)7
/ e9/l(' 2/A : L Ale i l ;��r 3 9 /_3: - {2.7i 5
(Address), / Address)
• (City) (State)
2 5"—C.7,Y`a
(Telephone)
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received , 19 By: •
•
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
- ,,�\ ca\\I?o . °�\
•
�1
AFFIDAVIT Jo1 19-` )
�.,...... �Z,it
fVIN EQP/
am the ovfner of the property involved n this�ng applicationdulyrandde thatrthehat I
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this /2Z day of \ �v�..� i� , 197 ,
,
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at/7 -L . .
ON
r9b
/7, __A . . xi
,..
.K,, i..i-ei ./a 4 --i:ii-Z,,L,./ a /L
'
(Name Off Notary Pu lic)
(Signatu of Owner)
/c ; r 1�c /4 ,,-tfh - 16,: � ' ;.
(Addres's) ici, (Address)
P `A/ /c.N 17-Y>f /
(City) (State)
(Telephone)
•
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department
governing the filing of such application .
Date Received , 19 By:
Renton Planning Dept . •
2-73
•
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • `/g• CHECKLIST FORM- - '• r6F
ECEIVED �c�
C.-
ENVIRONMENTAL 24..1979
. : �- ��,
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY.f;�,;�. ,�'.e.„ �, - . . - �Yj ..c
Application No. c,;?,4---- fn . •.
Environmental Checkl_i_s,t. No. .. _5(2, - /c.?7- // -•-.
PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: .
ODeclaration .of Significance . . ®Declaration of Significance .
® Declaration of Non-Significance ' '. ® Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
.
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposal's. The Act also requires that an .EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. ,
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies 'of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with. your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total 'proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the 'proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers ,
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though' completion may .not occur. until sometime, in :the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in.the future. . .
NOTE: This is a standard,_ form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal ., If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question. . , . .
ENVIRONMENTAL' CHECKLIST FORM •
I. BACKGROUND • ,
•
1. 2Name of Proponent' ' DC ro 1' diowk
2.'' Address and phone number of Proponent: .
•
•
.7-F)10,t a P,r1.,- ti 1t.?eA ?roe';
3. 'Date Checklist submitted ,i -',oa�-`,j '
•
4. •-'Agency requiring Checklist (2,l r.3V .4,-� �a4.; ;ia. a.rg �tl*t
5....Name •
' of proposal , if applicable! l
( ,e� ti.1n.A ""- � �r� Ad•o-�;„✓y . . . . .
6. ' Nature and' brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements, and other, factors that will give an.;accurate •
understanding of its scope. and nature) :
J
�i `1.
I.r' r•1.irf�•.,.�+i^`, '`b• -2- _ 1 .
▪ ,, ,i4 !' .•' • 1,,.
;7,. Location. ofa,pr,'oposal (describe the •physical setting` of the proposal , as well
f�' '. , `as the extent-of the' land area affected by any environmental impacts, including
:I any, other,•, inforation needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
:gmnn.ta.l setting of the proposal ) :
• .. , a ,-c. i A 1ft_62. &,
AV E el tee pi aN 0%7 14 e5c 0(/ 1i y
Pl a ur ✓.1rrrti 0 v1�te,Gt ' '.oe ha. .d—ia�.._r...,9 wag , PACILl '. .
8. Estimated date for completion of .the proposal : .
•
9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal .
(federal , state and local--including rezones) : II
__Bail P Vie....afl .— sera
•
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expa sion, or further activity
related• to or •connected_.with this proposal? If yes,,•explain: •
11. ;,Do you know of any, plans .b/ others which may affect .the property covered by
' your, proposal? If explain:
•
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
' , posal ; if;•none has been. completed, but is. expected to be .filed at some future
date, 'describe the nature of, such application form: ., • ..
emz....) .
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS '
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
•
(1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes, in,geologic
'substructures? ' ' ' ' ' " -
1S MAYBE NO
(b) . Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- .
. .... . ._ -covering of the soil? YES .. .MA N
(c) ' Change in topography or ground surface relief
- ' --features? , .. _ - . - ..
YES F ITT . NO
(d) The destruction, covering or- modification of• any
unique geologic or physical features? .- ., - ' " ' •• �
. Yam- MAYBE •NOo .
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
. , . - either on or off the site? :..... . ...'.......... . . .... :... .. . . ....._ . .. . _....
YES M BE 0
- (f) Changes in deposition or 'erosion'of beach"sands, or' : ,•
changes in siltation, deposition'or''erosion which"
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the; ocean or any bay, inlet'`or lake? - '` VET- MAYBE
Explanation:' . _ .
• .
. . . .
. • • . , .• .
,
• ,• .
;- = ,‘'!-,.- . • , . . , . • . .
.. . • ! , . .
.
. •
. ,
. , ' . • , • . ' • . •
, . • . -3-
•
. , •
. • •
. .
' • . , - - - .
, .
- (2) -Air. - Wills the proposalyreult 111:: .:;..
. . ' (a) Aicemissiont. or !.deteridiatioi 'Of ambient airl:
. ,./- • . quality?
. - . -'(. :--.,,..1 ',.:',i,'H . • . • Yrs— MUTE NO
,
. .
. . .• „•:, (b) The creation of,ppjctionaklodclrs?. .,.. . . ,, ', .• ,,, N.,_ ,
• .
. .
iy
' irEr*I 'MPTIIT
. . ,.. . • •.,!:•.:,. .:rrs, - ••, .......,t : ._,, , . .• ', .
. .
(c)..-Aiteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, .. .
, .
•or,any, change ,i clylate„ either .lecaly„or ,,,, ,,,, , ,,,q, ,, . 0 •
. ,
regionally? 4',- ' '': , . ), ,..1.,:. ; ,Y2,:,, ,, ,, r, ,.., ' ,, :. ' , •
, .
, .
- EXPlinitioni . • • , ; • '
--.
. .
. ' ' •'?,;1•;;:i'f•-01-i.,1 . ;','1 f i : :; '!;, :•:•;.i."'4 j r . ! !:, '7i.. '— ''' d i j . ' .. • . ! .
. • - .
., . • • , .
• ,
. ,
1 ..• . .. .
. .
. , .
... • • , : i : ' '.• . ' ..
(3) .-Water. .Will,the proposal- result in: • • . •
• , '
, .
• ,
. .' (a) Changeiln'currenti. or the. course of direction of , . . .• . ,
.
•
, ---- '-: -.- 'water-moVements-i-in-either-marine -or-fresh-waters?-
YES., MAYBE MAYBETE A- • ,
.,: ; , . .. ,:.,2';:•.•:_.:' f ,:,'f:t,1 1 i 3 3 i:;.;`.4 .';',::::'2, 'f ,,"; i ,:•''4•';'•:..•• .: ., I ; , ,•-,, . .: ,
. „,,,,, _. . _. .;.,-.„..... •.. . .„.- . • - •
. ' .),.! •' ' f,•,',I ' ••• .4.
(b) ,Changes in: absorption rates', drainage patterns, or . . • ,
• the rate and amount ,of surface water runoff? '
--- - - . - -• - - . - - • , -MAYBE'; filr
• •
A . , • , ,, , . I .
c) - ?Alteratioils-to the-course or-flow of flood waters? - - - -, •- - -: -
• YeT- MAYBE 1467 • . ,
. .
i--, (d) --ChangiHn-the• amount of surface -water-in any water -. --- - • - .
• • ', body? K. . •
' '') ' ' ' -- '• '- ',. :''' '‘' ' '' YES-:- MAYBE NO
• .
•
' _(i) l-'Discharge. into surface waters, or in any alteration •
. . .
surface water quality, Including but not limited to
. - -• - - ' temperature', '-dissolved oxygen or-turbidity? , • - - ,
, YES MR N
. ti). ' Al t e r a t i o n. of the direction or rate of flow of ,
- . --- -- ' -- -ground waters? •-, -• .- • • - - - - --,• •,. . , _ .. .,.... •_...,._.:.• _ , ..... 4
- '
' .; t L. , ,, , „,.. ,,t, ,,,-,, '.i. ,'..fl• „ . . ;- • .; t ., ',..; •' • 'I) :: • . ., • .• • •zi ' : .,-E-s MAYBE• :• ....'.. ..L'.-`,,__; .,,,''
, ,''' ; W ,; 4 t• ',• ':•;''","ir'
' ''."'...'"i.• (g) v\Change,rin the quantity of ground waters, either' -'•• T••• - - -- •' -
',. ,• • through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of aniaquifer by cuts or excavations? . •
, .
. . . . , - - • -• , ----• :-- YES MAYBE' N
1
,
. . -
, ,, --•• • .. , , • .
-.-.1- h)r- Deterioration- in-ground-water quality.-either- through . - - . - • • -- --- . .
.
' direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, • .„
. .
• , , • ; . phosphatesv•detergents•.-waterborne virus or bacteria, --- --7 --- --
' or• other substances:intorthe ground waters?. . ,.
, • . , •
,. MAYBE. . .
, . •
., • . ,
. .. . • .
r r
“: '''.' 1.%'''.' '' r. ' . 1''' ' • .' ' • ' . i
--,-',' (1) .Reduction in the'aMount'of water 9tnehrise available (- '' ' '' -• -, : ,'-2 , si ' .
. .
. • .for public water supplies? . .
. , `)•' ' ' ' ' YU- MAYBE •
Expia`natiOn: 4.3 so or ri," u tea r .474t,f"..„ ¢,e), t ' ,,. ' • : ,
. ,
•
4. .141 • ,rt . .
.nrOv Ifif. - WI '-ft-N- 174-0.. z -"+l---,, „, . , , .. .
t• ., ..,,.. . . .. . .,. . ._. ‘. . •
, . .
.
(4 Y" Flora:-.1111tithe proposal- result in:•
. ,
(a) Change in. the diversity Of,species, or'numbers of 'any... ': ::''''., ',:,,',1,s '' ' ••-• ' , ,
species' of flora (Including" trees, shrubs; grass;!crops ,‘.';•':-•;,r-, ;y-,;:''' . •
mi crofl era-and aquatic:,plants)?.'yr"; ' 1• -: %.,,' ! ••• ' ,..,-, ;, '." ' • '-'••''' ''''''
- .J.-. I.1,-?. . - z,i, • - .• , - ' • ••• • - '''-,•• •) - .u.- ' yrs—, MAYBE' . .
, •
, . _,
(b) Reduction : ',
of the numbers of any1unique, rare or , •
Q.. .•.,- 1- --- --endangered species of flora?' -
A
)
,
. ,. YET- RW
. .. .. . , . .
. . . . ......... _ _ . __ ....__. . ,
, (c) Introduction of new species- of flora into an area, or '
- ' - - -- in a barrier to the nCrInal replenishment of existing- - ----- -- -
_ -
species?
• --- - - • - - -------• - • --- • YES MAYBE _ . . .
. .
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural Crop? ' ' ' ' • •• . MKYB
... , ,, ,,.
. ,
Explanation: ' . .
,
• , . .
•
.... . . .. ..... ,. .. .,. , . • ,
- - ---• . ._ . -
. '
• ,i
_.... .., .._...______. ._. „. . . .. . _ . . . .. .. . .,
__ _ _ . .. .. , • • .
. . ..
. .
• ,
. .
. • • .
' •
, .
. ,
-4-
•
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species , orfnumbers' of
any species of fau•r�a (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish. benthic organisms, ' ( .,
- r, ,insects• or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO'
- ; , (b),;- Reduction of the numbers of any unique rare "or ' . ' . �[
.' •endange'red species of fauna? ' /\
l�ES WEE,, NO
(c)•' Introduction of new species' 'of fauna into'an 'area, ` '
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement ' ' '' ' '' ' '' '
"of fauna?
YES . , MAYBE,. 4--
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? •
- . _ ., ..YES —•MAYBE ,
Explanation: - . _...... .., . _ .
i . : ., • i:. .. • . ..
.
(6)'" Noi`se':' Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE . NOS
Explanation
(7)',: Light' and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?. „ , . ; ; .i .. .. . . . , . Yam' MAYBE ,
. . . ,.
, • ,.. Explanation:
' (8)•• Land 'Use.''-Will the proposal result in the alteration of the •
present or, planned land:use of an area? I • , Y— MAYBE N0�
Explanation: i
(9),- Natural Resources. Will the`proposal' resul't in: ' - '-
(a) Increase in the+ rate of u'se .of,any natural resources? YES MAYBE•' NO
(b) 'Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES, M BE fit
Explanation:
(10) Risk of Upset. . Does the .proposal involve a risk of an ,
explosion or the.,release of' hazardous:' substances' (including,
but not limited' to'," oil, pesticides , 'chemicals: or radiation) ',
in•the event of an accident or upset conditions? ' ' ' ES ` MAYBE "NO`
' Explanation:
,
l
r
e
(11 button, density, orhgrowthorateaofetheh rihuman' population
, .
of an area? Ym MAYBE
Explanation:
-5- '
(12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
YES • MAYBE NI,
Explanation:
•
(13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: .
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
.YES _ MAYBE NO
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking?
YES WEE NO
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
YES . MMAYBE N(
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
YES M YBE NO
• (er Alterati•ons to waterborne, rail or `air traffic?
Y MAYBE 2SL
(f) Increasein traffic hazards to motor vehicles, .
bicyclists or pedestrians? �
YES.. ,. MAYBE NO \
Explanations
•
•
•
(14). Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in,4ny of .the following ,areas : .
(a) Fire protection?:: . •
YES • MAYBE 4— •
(b) Police protection? •'
YES , MAYBE NO`
(c) Schools?
YES MAYBE NO\
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? ....
YES . . MAYBE N
(e) Maintenance of public facilities ;;,including roads?
YES MAYBE NCJ�
(f) Other• governmental services?
• YES .•, WEE NO
Explanation: .
•
.(15) Energy. Will the proposal result in.
(a) '.Use 'of substantial 'amounts of fuel or energy?
. , " • YES •.. MAYBE ?
•
' (b) 'Demand, upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
• YES MAYBE 67 .
Explanation:
•
(16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
• (a) Power or natural "gas? •
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Communications systems?
vE S MAYBE NO
(c) Water?
YES MAYBE NO
-,' `. - -d-)' Sewer or septic tanks? •
YES MAY6� NO',
(e) •Storm water`drainage? - . • ...• • -
•
YES RATITE NO
' (f) Solid waste and disposal? '
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
•
(17) .;Human Health. Will the proposal result' in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? :7 . , ' YES MAYBEW. C .. , .
.
Explanation:
(18) )Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
• ' any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
_proposal result in the creation of_.an aesthetically offensive: ; i
site open to' public .view? _ frE—S MAYBE NO .
Explanation: '
. (10) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the ; ,. :
- 'quality'_or quantity of existing recreational 'opportunities? Y-� RATITE"
. .
, .
(„,,
Explanation:
(20) 'Archeological/Historical . Will ,the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
,.site, structure, object'or building?',..., ES MAYBE . NUS
Explanation: •
III. -..SIGNATURE ....... . .. . ... • ., . . . __. .._.... .._.... ......... _ ._ ..
•
.I , the undersigned, state that to -the best `of"my knowl'edge 'the above information
is true and complete. Itis understood:that the,_l,ead agency.may ,withdraw any decla-.
-ration of; non-significance 'that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or will k of fu 1 dis losure on my part.
` Proponent. '--
s gn`ed
name, p i me . ,
City of Renton
Planning Department
. . ,• 5-76
OF R4,
O THE CITY OF RENTON
4D c1;07
U %0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055
Z mil, CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0 ® 235- 2550
O90 mac,
TFD SEP1s
March 9; 1979
Dr. Gary Kohiwes
Superintendet
Renton School District
430 Main Avenue South
Renton , Washington 93055
RE : BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION , 11 - lot Single Family
Subdivision ; File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , E-318-79
and W-319-79 ; vicinity of NE lith and Pierce Avenue NE
Dear Dr. Kohiwes :
Enclosed is a copy of BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION
We would appreciate any comments by March 26 , 1979 .
If we receive no comments by that time , we will -
assume you have no objections . Should you have any
questions , please contact this department .
Very truly yours ,
Gor Y . Ericksen
P1 wing Dir
G
avid . C emens
Associate Planner
DRC:wr
Enclosure
(-
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON ,
WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 27 , 19 79 , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1. GENE 0. FARRELL, APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY
PLAT APPROVAL OF •35-LOT SINGLErFAMILY SUBDIVISION
(WEATHERED WOOD NO. 2) , File PP-315-79 ; property
located at N.E. 23RD STREET AND EDMONDS AVE. N.E.
2 . BEL TERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP. , APPLICATION FOR
PRELIMINARY PLAT .AP'ROVAL OF,.11- ! SINGLE
FAMILY SUBDIVISIO ' C1004PBOD
, File PP-316-79 ; property located in the vicinity
of N.E. llth and Pierce Ave. N.E.
Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in
the Renton Planning Department.
ALL INTERESTED =PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 27 . 1979 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED March 16 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I + STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE- COPIES
OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn
to beforeo Mme, a Notary Public , •
onthe \ - day of � «�,�
19
19 -VI SIGNED
OF R4,.
0 ..-., 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
U ®y �?; Z' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.�55
n alL " CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0 m. 235- 2550
-"ep SEPt°
March 12 , 1979
Bel Terra Development Corporation
12843 N. E. 14th Place
Bellevue ,t Washington 98005
RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY
PLAT APPROVAL OF 11-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION
( BRENTWOO.D PARK ADDITION) , File PP-316-79 ; property
located in the vicinity of N . E . 11th and Pierce
Ave. N. E .
Dear Sirs :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on March 5 , 1979 A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for March 27 , 1979 at 9 :00 a . m.
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing.
If you have any further questions, please call the Renton
Planning Department, 235-2550.
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y. ' cksen
Planning irector
/ ,
By : G ___�� _
avid R. Clemens
Associate Planner
cc : Eastside Consultants , Inc .
James Vandermay
Ray Ball , Sr.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC. HEARING
MARCH 27 , 1979
APPLICANT : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP .
FILE NO : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , E-318-79 , W-319-79 (BRENTWOOD
PARK ADDITION )
A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
The applicant seeks preliminary plat approval of an 11 -lot single
family subdivision . In addition , there are requests for an exception
to the Subdivision Ordinance concerning pipestem lots , cul -de-sac
length and deletion of turnaround , and a waiver of off-site improve-
ments . (Site development map attached . )
B . GENERAL INFORMATION : .
1 . Owners of Record : JAMES VANDERMAY & RAY BALL , SR .
2 . Applicant : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP .
3. Location : Southeast corner of Pierce Avenue
(Vicinity Map Attached) N . E . and N . E . 12th Street
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department.
5 . Size of Property : ±4. 76 acres
6 . Access : Via N . E . 12th Street and Pierce
Avenue N . E .
7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1 , General Classification District;
R-1 , Residential Single Family
8. Existing Zoning in the Area : GS-1 , R-1
9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential
10. Notification : The applicant was notified in
writing of the hearing date . Notice
was properly published in the Record
Chronicle on March 16 , 1979 and posted
in three places on or near the site as
required by City ordinance on March
14 , 1979 .
C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND :
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1965
dated May 27 , 1959 .- That portion of the plat proposed for 7200
square foot lots was rezoned by Ordinance #3288 of March 5 , 1979
and Ordinance #2650 of August 11 , 1971 .
•
D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND.:
1 . Topography : The site is relatively level .
2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material , (AmC ) . Runoff is medium ,
erosion hazard is moderate to severe . This soil is used for urban
development.
3. Vegetation : The site consists of a mixture of deciduous trees ,
blackberries and grass undergrowth .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79
MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79
PAGE TWO BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION
4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat
for birds and small mammals .
5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site .
6. Land Use : An existing single family residence is located in the
northerly portion of the subject site and St. Andrews United
Presbyterian Church is found in the south part. The property
adjacent to the east consists of developed single family
residences as are the lots to the west. To the north is a
parcel of undeveloped single family zoned property and a single
family subdivision .
E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The surrounding properties are principally single family residential
in nature .
F . PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : Existing 6" water mains are located on the
N . E . llth Street , N . E. 10th Place , N . E . 10th Court and Pierce
Avenue N . E . .8" sewer mains are located along Pierce Avenue
N . E . and N . E . 12th Street and a 6" sewer main is located on N . E .
11th Street. In addition , an 8" storm drain is located on Pierce
Avenue N . E . at N . E . llth Street . Development of the property will
require extension of water and sewer utilities .
2. Fire Protection : Provided by .the—Renton Fire Department per ordinancE
requirements .
3. Transit: Metro Transit Route',#107 operates along N . E . 12th
Street adjacent to the subject site .
4. Schools : The site is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary
School , within three-quarters of a mile. of McKnight Junior High
School , and within two miles of Hazen High School.
5. Recreation : The existing Kiwanis Park is, located approximately
one-half mile south of the subject site .
G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
1 . Section 4-706 , R-1 , Residence Single Family'.
2 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District.
H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER
OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT :
1 . Subdivision Regulations , Section. 9-1106 ; Preliminary Plat Require-
ments .
2 . Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1105 . 6B; Waived Improvements .
3. Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1109 ; Exception's .
4 . Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report, 1965 , Objective 6 , page 18;
and Residential , Page 11 .
I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT :
1 . Natural Systems : Development, of the subject site will disturb
soils , remove vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an
effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper
development controls and procedures , however , these impacts can be
mitigated .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 ,
MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79
PAGE THREE BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION
2 . Population/Employment: The proposed plat of 9 new lots will
increase the population by approximately 32 persons (3 . 5 persons/
home times 9 homes ) .
3 . Schools : The proposed plat will increase the school population by
approximately 5 students ( . 5 students/home times 9 homes ) . These
new pupils are likely to be scattered throughout the grades and
not significantly impact the existing services .
4 . Social : Increased opportunity for social interaction will result
from development of the subject site .
5 . Traffic : The new subdivision will increase traffic in the area by
approximately 90 trips per day (10 trips/unit times 9 new units ) .
J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State
Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a . negative
declaration of environmental impact has been issued for the subject
proposal .
K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMEN-TS CONTACTED : (See Comments Attached )
1 . City of Renton Building Division.
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division .
3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division .
4. City of Renton, Utilities Division .
5. City of Renton Fire Department.
6. . City of Renton Parks Department .
7 . Renton School District No . 403 (no response received ) .
L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The subject' proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and zoning designations of single family residential use of the
site and surrounding area .
2 . The proposed plat isconsistent with the adjacent single
family uses and nearby subdivisions .
3. The proposed lots range in size from 7380 square feet to
73 , 250 square feet for the remaining church area and are
consistent with the minimum lot size requirements of the R-1
and GS- 1 zones . These lot sizes are also compatible with the
Studebaker' s Addition to the west and the lots to the east
on Queen Avenue N . E .
4. The proposed plat will reduce the existing setback of the church
buildings to 25 ' which is below the 100 ' minimum required
by the GS- 1 District . The applicant has requested a variance
application approval from the Board of Adjustment. Approval of
this plat should include the requirement for approval of said
' variance of modification of the plat to conform to the setback .
5 . The proposed plat will leave Queen Avenue N . E . as a cul -de-sac
exceeding the minimum length allowed by the subdivision ordinance ,
and not providing for the required 45 ' radius turnaround . The
applicant by his letter of February 21 , 1979 has requested
exceptions to allow the over length cul -de-sac and delete the
required turnaround . Further a waiver of the street improvements
for this street has been requested .
The applicant states that the proposed plat is not oriented
to Queen Avenue N . E . and will therefore have no effect on this
portion of the street. Subject to a vehicular access restriction
to Queen Avenue N . E . , this appears to be the case . Development
- y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING: BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos ; PP-316-79 , E-317-79 ,
MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79
PAGE FOUR BRENTWOOD PARK .ADDITION
of the plat as proposed does insure a long-term cul -de-sac ,
however, no adverse comments from any departments were received .
The Hearing Examiner should consider provision of a minimum
turnaround for emergency vehicles at the south end of Queen Avenue .
6. The applicant' s request for waiver of the off-site improvements -
is addressed to Queen Avenue N . E . only , however , as noted by the
Engineering Division , the waiver should also address N . E . 10th
Court , and N . E . 12th Street . All three streets , due to their
location or lot design to not appear to be directly effected
by any additional traffic movements as a result of this plat .
Only the Engineering Division directly addressed this request ,
and refers the matter to the Hearing Examiner without comment.
However , future improvement of N . E . 10th Court and N . E . 12th Street
should be insured by adoption of restrictive covenants . All
normal street improvements (curb , gutter , sidewalk , storm
drainage , paving , etc. ) should be included .
7 . Improvements to Pierce Avenue N . E . are proposed only on lots 1
through 4 , and not including across lot A at the intersection
of N. E . llth Place . In order to assure the public health , safety ,
and welfare all street improvements (curb , gutter , sidewalk ,
storm drainage , paving and street lighting ) shall be extended
to the northerly limit of Lot A. Without said improvements
the increased traffic at N . E . llth and Pierce intersection will
create the potential for impaired traffic safety .
8. Th.e applicant has requested exceptions to the subdivision
ordinance to allow pipestem lot arrangement for Lots 5 and 6.
The proposed lot 5 conforms to the 20 ' by less than 150 '
criteria established by ordinance . Lot 6 does not appear to be
a pipestem lot. Lot 5 should be approved as it will have no
apparent adverse impact on the general public .
9. Lot 4 , a corner lot, is not platted wider than the adjoining
interior lots . The lot should be widened such that the average
width is at least 75 ' (about 10' additional width to the north ) .
10. The Parks Department indicates a critical need for recreational
space in this general neighborhood . Recreational space should be
required prior to final approval of the plat (see memo attached) .
11 . Approval of the plat should be subject to final plan approval
for street storm drainage and utility improvements and provision
of a utility easement and storm drainage provisions from Queen
Avenue N . E . to N . E . llth Court.
Additional comments of other departments are attached for
consideration .
M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS :
Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval subject to :
1 . Improvement of Pierce Avenue N . E . to the north line of Lot A
per analysis #7 . Privision for future improvement of Pierce
Avenue by L . I . D . is provided by covenant dated February , 1979 .
2. Widening of Lot #4 to 75 ' width .
3. Provision of a 15 ' utility easement and storm drainage provisions
across lot 4 from Queen Avenue N . E . to N . E . 10th Court.
4. Final approval of street, storm drainage , and utility plans by
the Public Works Department prior to installation of the
improvements .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPOORT'TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , Files No : PP-316-79 , E-317-79
MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79
PAGE FIVE BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION
5 . Approval of a variance of the minimum building setback
ordinance for the Methodist Church or revision of the plat
to comply with the setback .
6 . Approval of the exception to allow pipestem lot arrangement
for Lot 5.
7 . Approval of the exception to the cul -de-sac length and
provision of a minimum emergency vehicle turnaround for
Queen Avenue N . E .
8. Approval of the waiver of off-site improvements for Queen
Avenue N . E . , and approval of a waiver subject to covenants
for future improvement of N . E . 12th Street and N . E . 10th
Court.
G.(5..... / , i
. 0 ., rrm ED G3 4=2:71 471 4 41 41 A
{- C • Ng 14 ft! sr 0 . "\ 0 az en=
I istAvont { 0 W `�:1►'z
F
,
10t0 on \
fas oR ' Q A O4:1 nil
� , 0 \tom_ 9 � 9Sa�0 Q.�i�f ry 0
f,
0 (P i 3E1 , I, ,Len e ;
WI 7- 1-. , 6,:', 1 lilt j ' ' i 0 t
BD9
D . Di i ,
sec 0 ,' i ,
, ,
I a 1, 1.1 ' 0
r5. , :, 1 0
± j ` IIiiii• ® ,.
��. , iiii s ; �.
iq
, %.1 1 Ly , ; \ V' ,,t, \ C
Ica, I ht,
3 X C911 I Ca/ t
.,. , 1 =- L,..a 0 \
Ntif 6r 0
1 0, 1 R I, ,1164, c, ,,,s/., w L.,,,
5 s ' , 1.'1 „...,,- 11 8 '.'
D ci r:j 1=1 ii, c3 E3 MI.,' - 1-1 I , Ej Ill,
NE jo r/j PL. : a . .., /rQ lore cr
1 El 0 b liar anoviion i
. �., - v i ,p j'�ti . 1 } 0
,5 .... i i ® ® ® �i 6
y ' ®
1\
0 1 Ala ek /Of' I I I I 0. "'t .4:4. I:3 ' :
A /
,,.,, 60,0 s ,
Am/106ov
. tier Avvrfl0J
. .. . .. . , .•
, • .....• . . ... . . .
, .
• • o' I1
i s'•,,..... 4,
..
• I \ l;• .,.............._N('`.'*. • . . •mcm ' •,..-..1.m •
. . .
.).
. .
% • Ada.449.47 n—.A.....--— •
i I I. eg A II3,.Piirl .
.._____,:.. i 4 ••
. ._•.— .. .
1 r . .
4 \ . , /
• ••
14o ' \ ' •
1 •
. • .
I i •
• s • . .
I 1. . ,
. t—I 1 .
• . .
---..-- I 6, • . • 1-i : .•
;.
1. . . .
i 1\•, r-li I H .
. . .
. •
•::s_ ,
S. ,. \ is, , ,
cf)• 1 •
. r• ...
•... ii •
.-- •
1 .
" • i.
. ' .'
,
•
• • 1-1),JATT • .
11 ' ii • ,
( \
1 * + Lod/d.r../ 9 Iv*
• ,( tivairf..: Pxyd froiNi •. .. . -
— .
-Pal
.od
. '. . . . . ... -...".. -1 1.1. . - . %. . . -,
:WI -".
IN•:•, -....., -"g 1 .,.., t
' 1 •
, ,. •s P. (S) ?I 01 ,' .1:
"4 4 •' s• 4)/ $ I
I I Y /// 7.
I , 1
• I ,a\'• • if .iTh 1 '• • o ,
K-°) 11 s,s•, , .. 1. /
,tp:211, W
- - , I '•• ' ..•- '' ---...N. I/ _
• , ..•i r.;, ''• ., 1/4 • •
•' • •C... "ir oVii
. I (1 . -...- i ‘ ,A,...,,, 0• `..1.)1 u 1, 0 1
I .
L' .. -/' .,.; '.'.. 2,•;,.....: ‘
, , 4 la ii,1 .
1 . • ; .#-,r, .
• ,,,,• • -
.--;•:.........;:,. ------/ .,.. ...,„: „ .... . .
, ..... i
•
, • • .. , •,‘ ..- 4.„?........„..u.• . ', ''. " * .. ,.. •.' ,_ ." eo.,1 ,s. ou xte ,,,, .•
. .
.. , ..- • ,,, . ,4114..,+,i 1,-`,....,..44-
&V.A.....
,
. . . .
1:1, ..
--l.k, . r..._...... .
.,• ,k.,. • ,., .,
.... 4 ".• xatt•••• ,,,,•• • •,
• It I ' .lit . , ', i,.. f. ',' ';•$. -•---•
• • I/ )i • •
• . . : e-..„- -ry
%ialr;4
• ‘ ... — Izi
- -i • ••• ,.X0 1 t3 • '' i
4
. .,
• .•• •..,
ic,, .. ...._._ .ow--7--•-a ri !••• • . . . .
. .
. .
, I. \ il , xl• ,, k
.
. •• . „ . i • -,- , , I
i ) RI. il. • . .
, \ 1 1.. 11
• .,
......____.7._, __ __ I, • to
. .
•
• . -
.. .
I
. • 1 (I•11 I.. k I.. '. • d .
. .
4 1
. .. ,
. 1 , •
. 1 —.00/ • •-1 1, .1
......-..............
• •, Ii
,
, ; : '., •
• kl a • , .
, k . . \ . • i :
.
F. .
• ,1 • ., •
. •
:::-- z• .4 „ .__. .' * t., 1
.j k) .• VI 1" ' .1rOi , \ ii ' /
, , _ — .. —. —
l's .4. i i ...) '•• I., ‘•'4 .. ...... .._„:
•:•• • et
tt v. is •,, t .1/4 III •..
•
, I —lf
\N;Li I 4 --
• . WI/IN
%. 0C ,!". ,q 1Z.• 02 k tr '..:\ ,1 • —
', ‘,.‘;14— •
4. ..; .
. . F_ kil •
,. . k•I
..trls..p . . ..1 . .. I .
.1,
! tiii
,st .•:.__„ . 1.:
I toil% r : i, .
•
..i :.,..,i,. . 4,1 .
qA „..._., :
.._.4.,.,II ...___.. .1 1. 16,1
,,, o• I.' • .
...cll.:4 •
' •",
...
1
CI VI 1
!.., ...1 t i•V' % 1
• V
- ,-
f ki.1 I
i'iiit •
, vis x
4 kt sio
.1..... t..,11 . 0 .
• -. ,.
,..
I" . ' - •
!: Q I ... : I '' • .
•4-,s...,,y: • P•1 ,_ ...
, •,,.„0..%. , _..... \, ' •' l . • .............. .
•,,,414.1'41 • • C7P r, ?,c),....e, 67p-3_._
-1.c.ir.,
. ii
,,,,,,,i..:. v.,.!/ •tiv 12:
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: ® Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
® Park Department
police Department
AD Public Works Department
® [Wilding Div.
Engineering Div . (Please verifyi egal descripJ on )
8 Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Departments (signed by re V je eiaat, sponsible official or
his d igne
DATE : /Ø9 .
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT : 4#1, ed'lli/e/Metqe
LOCATION : .. ', ,. = `fijt
PLICATION S 4.��°1 �'° 1/`%.,'`. M: - . r -/6 79
AP :( � i.
®74/ 71 4aIeI • vaia) /#'Sever-tee �' ins 9/94, r� ,;,,rase
fiN. ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARIN ,�,
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : r, ' /6 �"
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department: ( �.-4
=I Approved 4 Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
E xfe- .- - 4- /9
2) .SiA,)--,- 6..),,, t- zz --/-e----i------`,/cle-,,- t-0‘-- yig-- 44--4--e
.._ ,61m,/'c,,,,---(5 v-•_e.,--d__ 1,-e-a-1-24L- A- LA) 0-4-'11-4"-1--- 5' e
6sizi<'-6--,;(-(b--,,,,,,e.:-t-- , /1,4-..)-6,Ae-i--- N /ar/A----4,„,,,,,a9-- i AIL--:/ell-sit-
z--14,-(2i 1-e- Le-a4.46-1 Gt-r, 4- 022.-A-1-;t131/ c:74-. A.--,614.)-4C-62,0-k-i,e_ersli..751—
/ rf-7 / / C,e6449--,-x_.--- X.01
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative
Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: ® Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
® Park Department
® Police Department
Public Works Department
0 Building Div.
Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description)
e Traffic Engineering Div.
Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his d igne "
ezaM/e)
V DATE : 944/AP
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
APPLICANT: ;410,164WW.ofe -
LOCATION : / /� eezAPPLICATIONS) : eked / tele1,0 /0/4
oefee-01/
76044
IN ORDER TO BE ,INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO. THE HEARING / Ill
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : r.`, /6 79
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : T/ AFAI C CAOi i 50 ./4106
- ,• Approved ® Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
P 3—/Z —7?
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
i
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : ® Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
0 Park Department
® Police Department
® Public rks Department
Building Div.
0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description )
8 Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his dielpe
/ ia
DATE : 01AP
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
APPLICANT : , /. iii/e/oue
LOCATION /// //� f!
APPLICATIONS) : � �t� / "2' 4 AW4A /679
e 4/7-7l ,fria 4e i f 00- / eogee- '/9-7.
fereiemyeci
IN ORDER .TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING ,� % I��
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : . , , �0 '9
•REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTJIENTS :
Department : L--D
Approved Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
, -/-- (,e, Li /--.L------------ ___s- 'T2 - 7
Signature o Di rector or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : Q 'finance Department
Fire Department
II Library Department )
0 Park Department
/ O Police Department
O Public Works Department
4
O Building Div.
JEngineering Div. (Please verify legal description )
( raffic Engineering Div .
\_.�. 0 /___— 0,0Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his d igne eweier„7 DATE : 9/09
,
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPPLICATION FOR :
APP_LICANT :. 41H+J//1Ué
LOCATION : /(/! �� ''• e/
APPLICATION(S) Agt#4,tea/
: ffoz ...xy, ;id44:14 -%!/6-79
6e 407-0-# 49e5 lel;4 i i? od?-79&/-e -me og 9/9-71
IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING * IN,
RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO ` THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : r� /4 79
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
_Department : I ._
En Approved Not Approved
Comments or conditions : n
()l cc nod 1-1re �h..�clrettr+ 5i � 1i hC 1 -' sTc, lied cArc1 yea ay ``uie
(Le_. lof-e0ie is To 04lL.( . b ( % Will Cohs `rrlAC 7i0,1: L'Va-t v, i1 Qin
sizes ctr.Ct 1r\ srActf"ion ems• re-9L,t%r-ecc 6ki 0,5oi+er is7L17es6.
X,./ n L3 (-L o 3 — 02. - 7 -
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :} uT►t_. ,rtr s
CM Approved � Not Approved
Comments or conditions :
p(2.vcrrn, urtL.,r,rf.S I)wc S 1°HHet C.7"-, 5i»S
1 4 I ' w.1,i` L .•S/-L w re-"- S'T o c,-t G 5
(
(0A,. 3 -IL- 7,
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
•r
o THE CITY OF 'r ENTON
V ;IV 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR 0 PARKS and RECREATION
JOHN E. WEBLEY - DIRECTOR
�,�4 kb
SE Pit- • 235-2560
RENTON PARK DEPARTMENT
BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development, in itself, does not constitute a major impact
on our Parks & Recreation system. However, several such actions have
recently occurred in this planning area and cumulatively provide a
significant impact. Kiwanis Park is located in this area and provides
a substantial recreational land base, however, it is not sufficient to
handle the total service area. According to the City's Comprehensive
Park and Recreation Plan, the #2 and #3 acquisition projects for the
City lay north and south of this development (#1 and #2 on a neighborhood
basis) . The impetus to acquire a site in the Sierra Heights area is
absolutely critical.
•
•
•
•
a
- •
PROPOSED/FINAL __;LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE, N-SIGNIFICANCE
Tentative Plat
Application No . 285-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . FCF-4?7-79 0 FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Applicant proposes a 9-lot single family
subdivision (proposed Brentwood Park Addition).
Proponent BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Location of Proposal Between Queen Ave. N.E. and Pierce Ave. N.E. in
the vicinity of N.E. 11th Street.
Lead Agency RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is
® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist 'and other information on file with the lead agency .
Reasons for declaration of environmental significance :
This declaration of non-significant impact is subject to provision of
appropriate development measures and standards to mitigate any potential
adverse environmental effects , and subject to the modifications_proposed.___
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final )
declaration of non- significance :
•
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title Plannin Dir ctor Date February 8, 1979
Signature
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76