No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-430 ' Renton City Council 6/15/81 Page 3 Mark Hecock Land Use Hearing Examiner recommended approval with (Eden Estates) conditions for Mark Hecock (Eden Estates) , 11-lot Preliminary Plat preliminary plat, PP-079-80, with variance requests , PP-079-80 and E-021/22/23-81 , for cul-de-sac length and piepstem E-021/22/23-81 lots. Council concur. Claim for Damages Claim for damages was filed by Ronald D. Bauer, 1151 Shelton Avenue N.E. , in the amount of $262.45 for damage to automobile, alleging street flusher sideswiped the left side of automobile while parked. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Short Course on The Planning Commission is sponsoring "Short Course on Local Planning Local Planning" to be held at 7:00 P.M. on June 25, 1981 , in the Council Chambers. The Mayor and City Council Members are invited along with other jurisdictions . King Subregional David Clemens, Director of the Planning Department , Plan Revisions presented revisions to the King Subregional Plan, which included the definition of Secondary/Metropolitan Center amendment and a new Business/ Industrial Area designation proposal ; also, authorization request for the City' s representative to support the proposed revisions . Council concur. Writ of Mandate A writ of Mandate has been filed by Washington State Local 21R vs. City Council of County and City Employees , Local 21R vs. City of Renton, to proceed to arbitration on the grievance of Ronald Lyons. Refer to City Attorney. Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, ACCEPT THE CONSENT Approval AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Annual Western Letter from Toni Nelson, President , of Renton Merchants Day and Sidewalk Association, announced Annual Renton Western Days and Sale Sidewalk Sale on July 30, 31 , and August 1 , 1981 . 7/30-31 . 8/1 Permission was requested to close off traffic on South Third Street and block off portion of Williams Avenue South on August 1 . `MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. Substitute motion offered by Stredicke, seconded by Clymer, to approve the request and refer the subject to the Public Safety Committee failed. ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS AVIATION COMMITTEE Aviation Committee Chairman Stredicke recommended the REPORT Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the renewal of FAA Lease No. FA4-1486, Remote Transmittal Receiver and Rotating Beam Ceilometer, for a period of ten years with an option to renew for ten years. It was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AVIATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. UTILITIES COMMITTEE The Utilities Committee recommended that the Council REPORT concur in the report of the Public Works Department regarding the Talbot Hill Pipelines, CAG 019-81 , contract adjustment and that the Public Works Director be authorized to execute said change order on the report recommendations. It was MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER, THAT THE UTILITIES REPORT BE APPROVED. CARRIED. un Renton City Council I 6/15/81 Page 4 TRANSPORTATION The Transportation Committee recommended to the Council COMMITTEE REPORT that the matter of the Park and Ride Lot, Stage 2 (Highlands) be referred to the Committee of the Whole. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3554 The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final Bel terra reading and adoption of an ordinance granting Belterra Development Development Corporation the right, privilege, authority Corporation and franchise to construct , maintain and use for ingress Franchise and egress a street. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3555 The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final Dixon Rezone reading and adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning R-029-81 classification of R-2 to B-1 located at 3241 Sunset Boulevard N.E. , known as the Dixon Rezone R-029-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, THAT COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3556 The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final Bowen Rezone reading and adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning R-030-81 classification of G to L-1 located on the north side of Grady Way between Thomas Avenue S .W, and Lind Avenue S.W. , known as the Bowen Rezone R-030-81 . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, THAT COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3557 The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading Transfer of Funds and suspension of the rules advancing ordinance to Park Facilities- second and final reading. The ordinance was read. Maplewood Golf MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, TO SUSPEND THE RULES Course AND ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READING . CARRIED. The ordinance was read providing appropriation and transfer of funds from the Park Fund, $5,000, unto the Park Facilities Fund for the appraisal of the Maplewood Golf Course. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Resolution #2407 The Ways and Means Committee recommended the reading and Transfer of Funds adoption of a resolution transferring funds from the Water Systems 1975 Water and Sewer Construction Fund to the Water Improvement/ Systems Improvements/Hospital Account in the total Hospital Account amount of $521 ,825.96. It was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS "Accessory/ Councilman Hughes, City representative to the Puget Mother-in-Law Sound Council of Governments , reported PSCOG discussion Rentals" of Add-a-Rental accessory units to alleviate housing shortage, local jurisdictions requested to review possible benefits. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, TO REFER THE SUBJECT OF ADD-A-RENTAL UNIT TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Proposed Energy A letter from Mayor Lorraine Hines, Chairperson, Puget Management Program Sound Council of Governments, was presented in regard to participation in a proposed Energy Management Program sponsored by the King Subregional Council (of PSCOG) . Bonneville Power Administration will make available approximately $100 million per year to local entities in the Northwest states. These funds are to implement local projects that conserve or generate electrical energy. It was MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND CLYMER, THAT MAYOR HINES LETTER BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CARRIED. For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of June 15, 1981 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn J. Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. PP-079-80: Eden Estates Consent X Preliminary Plat; Mark Hecock. Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X • Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner' s Report . 4-1-81 Other B. C Approval : Legal Dept . Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept . Yes No. N/A X conditions Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The appeal period for the subject application expired on April 15, 1981 ; however, this office has been awaiting submission of a revised plat map which reflects approval conditions denoted on the attached report. This information was received on June 10, 1981 , and the matter is hereby forwarded to the City Council for review and approval . /4§ :-PECENFb JUN 11 I98I PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: i\19---------_._..�..--,�� See page 4 of the attached report. ��'G' QEPPR SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. PLANNING DEPARTMENT IPRELIMI P4JA% f REPORT TO TIHIE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 24, 1981 APPLICANT : MARK HECOCK FILE NUMBER : PP-079-80 A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE 5E OF REQUEST : The applicant requests approval of an 11-lot preliminary plat together with exception requests for ( 1) cul-de-sac length ( 2) cul-de-sac width and (3) pipestem lots (Nos . 4, 6, and 10 ) . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : • 1 . Owner of Record: Mark Hecock 2 . Applicant : -Mark Hecock I 3. Location : (Vicinity Map Attached) On N .E . 28th Street between Kennewick Place N.E . and Aberdeen Avenue N.E . 4. Legal' Description : .A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Property : +2.9 acres 6. Access : Via Kennewick Place N.E . 7 . Existing Zoning: G-7200 , Residence Single Family ; minimum lot size 7200 square feet 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : G-7200 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single Family Residential , Greenbelt 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on February 22, 1981, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on February 20 , 1981. C C . IH IST®RIYAA1C4KCRd®flJ D : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No . 1835 of August 23, 1960 . It was rezoned from P-1 to G-7200 on May 20 , 1974, by Ordinance No . 2852 . A six-lot subdivision was approved on the site in May of 1976, File No . PP-838-75 by the Renton City Council . This preliminary plat has elapsed. . On December 28 , 1979, the Hearing Examiner denied another request for preliminary plat approval (8 lots) . D. PHYSICAL :ACRSCRBONS: 1. Topography: The subject site rises from west to east at slopes ranging from 12 to 16 percent. 2 . Soils : Alderwood and Kitsap soils ; ;very steep (ArF) . Slopes . are very steep. Drainage and perme, ability vary. Runoff is rapid to very rapid, and the erosion hazard is severe to very severe. The slippage potential is severe. These soils are used for timber . Indianola Loamy Fine Sand ( InC) . This soil has rapid permeability, available water capacity is moderate, runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate. This soil is used for timber and for urban develop- ment . 3 . Vegetation : The subject site is heavily wooded with numerous evergreens and some deciduous inter- mixed. 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site (February 20, 1981) . 6 . Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped with scattered single family homes located to the south, east and west . E . NEIIGH 1:;®RBHfl®®R4 CHARACTERISTICS: • The surrounding properties are principally single family residential in nature. F . PU1LIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main extends east-west on N.E . 27th Street within 200 feet to the south of the subject site and a 12" main runs north-south on Kennewick Place N. E. approximately 200 feet to the west . A 12" sanitary sewer is also located on N .E . 28th Street . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Depart- ment per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit : Metro transit Routes No . 142 and 144 operate along N.E . 27th Street . 4. Schools : Kennydale Elementary School is within 4 mile to the west of the subject site while McKnight Junior High School is approximately one mile to the south and Hazen Senior High School is within 3 miles to the east . 2 . All of the proposed lots meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the subdivision ordinance for size and frontage except lots 4 ,6 , and 10 for which pipestem exceptions have been requested. 3 . In 1975 and 1976 a residential subdivision of 10 lots was reviewed by the Planning Commission and the City Council . The final approval placed five conditions on the preliminary plat and reduced the number of lots to six . That plat lapsed and the Hearing Examiner denied a subsequent 8-lot preliminary plat on December , 1979 . 4. Access to the site has been the primary concern expressed in past reviews . The applicant proposes entrance via a +700 foot long cul-de-sac . The proposal would exceed the maximum 500 feet permitted by Section 9-1108-23A(5) of the Subdivision. Ordinance. This cul-de-sac as shown on the proposed plat is only 25 feet wide for the first +340 feet of length . Section 9-1108-23A (s ) requires 50 feet . The existing topography and generally inappropriate alternative access suggest that there is some justification for the exception requests ( Section 4-2916A-1 ) . City departments have expressed no opposition to the width or length except for the Traffic Engineering Division . This department has recommended denial of the exception request for cul-de-sac width . The Planning and Public Works Departments have evaluated the street width proposal and have concluded that a minimum 32 feet curb to curb width and sidewalks (42 feet right of way is required for safe visibility and adequate access . ) 5. The applicant must provide a deed for the D. W. Moje property to be used for access as per Engineering Division comment . Storm water retention-detention will also be required. Also, no access is to be permitted via N .E . 28th Street . 6 . The Fire Department notes that the access road shall consist of at least 20 feet of unobstructed width with a turning radius of 45 feet from the center to the curb . The paving and fire hydrant shall be installed and serviceable prior to any building construction . 7. Standard hook-up fees for sewer and water ( .01/square foot ) will apply . A special area assessment of .03/square foot for sewer will also be charged. Utilities Engineering further indicates that waste and sewer plans must be approved. 8 . Traffic Engineering also advises that a street lighting plan will be required. 9 . Pipestem lots are proposed for lots 4, 6, end 10 . Given the topography and access problems previously addressed , these requests appear to be justified. , 1 5. Recreation : Kennydale Lions.. Park is located approximately 4 mile to the southeast and the North Highlands Park one mile to_ the southeast . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 ; "G" General Classification District. H . APPLICAmLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAIN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Subdivision Regulations, . Section 9-1106 ; Preliminary Plat Requirements. 2 . Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report , 1965 , Objective 6, Page,.18 and Residential , Page 11 . I . IMPACT ON THE N!\TURAL OR HUMAN EINVIROININEINT: 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will remove the vegetation , disturb the soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on trafffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures, however, these impacts can be mitigated. 2 . Population/Employment: The proposed plat of 11 lots wip increase the area population by approximately 38 persons (3. 5 persons/home x 11 homes ) . 3. Schools :{ The proposed subdivision will increase the school population 5 students ( . 5 student/home x 1 home) . 4. Social : : Development of the subject site. will result in increased opportunities for social interaction among the area residents. 5. Traffic The new plat will increase traffic in the area,lby approximately 110 trips per day (10 i . trips/unit x 11 units) . J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERINIINATI®IN: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C , a Declaration of Non-Significance was issued for the subject proposal on February 22, 1981, by: the Environmental1Review Committee. K . AGEINCIES/DEPARTIMIEINTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department 6 . City of Renton Parks Department 7 . Renton School District No. 403 L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of single family residential use for the site and surrounding area . M. DEPARTMENTAL REC®NNEN®h TIE Based upon the above analysis , it is recommended that the preliminary plat for Eden Estates , PP-079-80, be approved along with the exception requests to allow (1) pipestem, lots No. 4, 6 and 10 and ( 2) the exception requested for the cul-de-sac to be in excess of 500 feet . The exception requested for street width should be approved in accordance with L-4 to assure adequate , access and safe visibility . • / ', IL-•-1121.4 6"---7,37- 1 _ } -_14 .! 22%.••••••••••44....4'....Vey.t___ . ._ • I i : • 1 . : am litt,_:.___. „. tea - ' i , , i. . 1 157 ,,, ---. ,- 1 - - 1 4.. ...5 . 1 __E. k,v_l___J ,, ' W ,-- i - I I. 65 • . .-. • r. •:.'. . . 49 -.!,-r--!; ., j •-- " 3G.I9a / - - .1- -I . • " 11 --- • -------------------1;! • ' ' -. 1 ''• / • 1 ;f. -717*.:4-4?1',7141a0 1411t7- 1°-17--- .ts 1! 3 r...:' LI- ' G ' ':• . at ',. • -.: ".,"•• ,, '.•:',.i:•••••00, • - i i; I. • • •• ... , ,. ,,• ---1 " , N •2 .•9, I t r... . • c, i I . _ o 4 5 "c4 BO I . ...%;..)....4 at 1 1 .,, ---• ' • " ' .. ,i.' :: ---.-"--- I. 1 79 • .o 5 .... ;1:417T, .1, 97 _.4 4. ?„ . 4.. ,..• ii 71.1-..--/ -..,. . .. '. ....I le .1 95 ( /,, •__. I 41 • ,1 ,L. ..7.:. •' ,14•111:44• 'Ir'..;. 4•..k...,14.61,, , Q 4 4 , . _ .e.% P.Lk_L9.7__. __ ---_-•...=,.-7._L:.-_-_ --...5r. ? , • ... , .,, . • ..•.. ••,•• .......10 •..4...• a. A- 22 ri, ii /, , \ ,,,,.• , ,, • 4:ir.:1..:.. ,i........:.,...,.,_.!.. : •'. i 7'7' _ ......... , , l • ..\ t 5,Ley.. 5! 1 i, ..-/ , ., j 1 :7-7-- ,I\ . -•• ... 1-.:-------7 --.--'•.\ -- •'-'!-* 1 i I4LU 2i?O.i,l.; Y! ' •.•.. I .-: 1 I4I:. 4. • ' LP •029 P--6.-1.. 1. .d/ 9 _ 4 6 36 LG V.- . 2.?.•I....54,1f.,t3,•tG•..l.s14a ••_ ,.,. I . i •I i i 1 ....----... . " I 1 * • .• . . • • * 41, ••6 A •-... 95 92 1, ! , . 11/I .1r1111• 1111 i ': - ! eta 1 „..,...,,.„.. A. . r, 51.0 t ler' 971 : ,liaftfildk iting., . . 740 ' Melliellealle21141111+6,101. • • • I el • I.k .., , 1 , , ! • • WW1 L. !.. •_• , il ""--...... _.....L._._ , , 1 i id I !1 ,, ir5(.4-7rliiiiiiiiiiiiiii: 55't LLANIT ,i I , ;,...1.!" ,I PO es 9 .04 0 ---- I I 1 .• ...-- - ..r..„....,:;uu „ , . i ,L_Hill 1 IAMB 111111 .10 4 :".! / Ili 1. *4 i .4.1 6". GS- 4 66 .:•..• .•"_,,,, ' • ...,,1 6. . \. ._ _ _, __ __.jimeer.. .1 T '..19t, ...4 " ..• t '17 7. " 7' ' - 52... , ,! 16.-__\ . , , . s 11.1 2 i. a irpLrr` , ' . il , . . . \ , .-------- .' i . . ,Ac..,,-,c ,• _____ , . t: d1-..-„%s, ,,„,fi"C"... .9. ?7,-.,.. 4 Q-„.'l; ' ' ' ....! , i 411MI4. '11111111111111111111111 '•••,. -00'11.- " --; 1 ii141:17 ‘:....: -'- \',.4:31..,4,,, .4 '..e,0",.. ..fiii....,L4..; ..; ...4 1 • " Gc mon i Iii. alli a- -.2,t4. ir,11,.1 L-- ---\.. ', •:'"04 ; ,c,-- so, \ , 1 0.V.,.../t. " ! ti la .V lel ''''•• 1 •14. I 1 I IIME) i\so 0 l 'Pi ' \ .- ---- r- ,. • 11-;' ---...-.1.: ..------....7114471-1 1 \ --• ..:17‘..0.3, i 1 ; - .. .., . ..„7 .. Jo/q .,41 7 zi,,, I 4;e - - • LE77; . '-',....1:1-. 157-1' 7.3 - •I%-----.r ..••---•:..,-,,,- zao z57.7 -21;z7TEltsf, 1 zcs ; . .. • • P• I, 0 •,:s..,..\\:\.\\.\\.5•. 0.7\41,41%. et°..). %,.. L,.., .• •• - :!......tel4i.Ll ; ---- . ...-In______. --.--p!;--- . • i 1 II .' - \ r:'''IPN. '. .R. • .11°-•-_ ...----f..------ -I, F. ______,:-- - -1---i- 1 r. N p'. • .P. .„ t. _ 1.' ----.... . PTharirr- . , .. . 1 . al %24 I - .--; • .... -- ti. 1 ,H .. . fr. ....11.,., . . \, .7..,..„.,,,. ,, .. , le tea. • 0. • PLL. •!! 295 262 tta 41 , Z54 Z41 , EN. 2129,,,_.(•,,,,r•-.1017', i sp !,.._. __...._ ---0.,. I I 2 • i I ..?•I...-. I' ? 1 le .0 4 I 1- 1 ,,I_ .'.. 1111,, 69 av -. ua- .1 I. I I '' t'l-' 4.. !P '....,. . . ...--1. I • , i ._.„ j 1 1----' .t.t.W... :• i •, a , s , ' t i P.)12."."--11 h,. ,1 -- 1 •"----: ...----Ti-Ci T- '41m. .- IT-..7 - 1.21...j. ----!i Ii1771 ri--1'.''.11.7141• I , • . . ", • 1157 .. SII !II ilals.r.„,: 2-•3 ZOE 2 242. 255 Zza'.. ; :Tr * _,- ,-. '',. . ;!ii ciii,. _ :IS''' ZB5 • • 4 • .1 --f."--H7E_--Tiliai V - I I .. -... " , . . . ,! .' 'Ili 111- '..- - • - - • ' ' I ..•,-,.. ; * H.Ys.k.-1 :::.• . 1 z ill 4:IlL„..,0 -4 ' 0 ' .. -FIT:;4.1-Ht-11.:•..41.L.lg....;11 11-". • 1 . ' • • _ "- -• - i • Sap % :1 1 293 2p4 . 272 . 1(.3_ N . 243 4)4- ZZ5 r;e: 4 -;I.0.141 • -. . . .11 . :...l. .. • .; , i .tal • ! ''' - . , 1 . . - - ` •• -•• IN •L.. - , :, ' t; -.. ' `r 74.4.1 . I: • • n ......_"...4,* . . . . ..... L - 1 '---710: 00;02;620454:0248• -01ii.- ----'1. .Q...6 \-- . .. \ • •\ . MARK HECOCK (EDEN ESTATES) • . PP-079-80 . . .• ..APPLICANT MARK HECOCK • TOTAL AREA ±2 .9 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Kennewick Place N . E . EXISTING ZONING G-72009 Residence single family • EXISTING USE Undeveloped - PROPOSED USE 11-lot . single family subdivision COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential ; Greenbelt . COMMENTS . . • .. I • • • OPar/ +v - �iru ^ Arid Alvr" ' 11.1 , sV.ir %id +"i ;zz ®oie e0d d i �-f.1'• V en .o3%i47a ij'r-' ".• .... . S•7�a ?,.,• 'agupr Aaveur,�r . . . . a.'sarM ) 4-$0 ' 09 toga' ,�d• o� *e • s� d1i 't %Y%� mug.10 n as, '4.`'� `6 • 'QLD/Y/ n1 S'Ar ShIeS771F+00 ZS' s0ev21.1. rar 6 r __b !YOad/ ')SYCt V 711., dr' 0 4,g311jj1j3� • y� 1So7'.? ', ', o 70 990 Fi e tai va 1c u g :pry -i\-- / j r+ oodoac/ O �' 8S4 r + \ u \ i5G __7_ ._ t N 11 I ` 1 . i_ fyi\\ -J � F( — ,,5r—— — , rl: — -�— —if r\ �-If SI - \--- — ) . — 1 I 1 1 ( ril 'V - \ • i I z.1 I II I III ICI l a I i Ii fr I / UI ` I� i / 1 , 1 (— -1 1\ 1 I I 1 1 ) I` - _ _ _�> - , ;i 1 r -%, . , \ ! \ /41 //ash " * 1 �' t ` ` `� I 1 1 --- ,k Oa • \ • } 1 ,, 1 , 1/\,,, ti. \ /I r I 3 ' . • I f. -I / /.7-7,---( (.... ..._.,\`,, \ 1 I rt. 1 11 1 . . ., ,a... . ; / \I L. .._]H ' '\ ,L l 14 s7.ea~ 1 i. c2/ V \ • \• 1 ,gas 1' \ :>.\ %!, sl �, r A r, / , l , 1 ! i ` `\ G � ; o --... ou------,. , --_• _7( _j 1 /' j L—--7--- • • 7 o!y !Y3'a 9 do f/ O?/ 0 /Y0.19N/MS 4"4q 3?/0_0'7S,nb'AV r] C3 E iicL7a7 C7 C1 • Q IG -._s� •" �h--- - 'sl+''�c`-r .---rya.• �y'•n57�@SS6MA ;e,�-c +'ix,,,,, ita"iv't1- ,.,......-,. :4, . L.. ' . J ja6/91 Pl.annin. 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application . :_ '' "MY act -tr E s s • Location : } • ,,1 < f. s a °if 600 APP 1 i cant : PtS erdiV9v1 a tole• a pai So/ TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE , Police Department A, R. C, MEETING DATE : Public Works Department a •c• �! Engineering Division T fic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITTNG FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:u0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Yuurt DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : G Approved Approved with Conditions ;, Not Approved ' l • 3-7o9 Signatur 6T Director or Aut r ' zed Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved,, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . Date - ' )1a6191 ,Planning 12-1979 , RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT h DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : 13 ' A, ., _ _' - : , . �: j I ° ' I a 0, , i �� .� ohs • . he ekcepfe on replies s f ol-01( l.4..0a e. � of �� '�I1 • .. w ® [: is • Location . •, 1„ PJ1 . S c� y��es® 'I P Applicant.: PPSer'ffiorl IAN,,. E 1 ft4 ecock 1 lrie.1- aped Si TO: Parks Department SCHEDULEDAEARING DATE :_ _ Police Department A. R,C. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department k •e• 11 11 i Engineering Division \, Traffic Engineering Building Division i Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF Yuuh DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON c REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7-/e6(F, F.v inrE EA'Iry 6 Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved e4-fi, of e ->,-./ iaacAvay 7n he 6 c7�.�P -e)(Cep1 io1-,5 15 l L � '1a,<e1. ,2 o __5/7 -! ' /f;*1--✓p/ �I—p i '//''e Ek c 'p//olio ,CJ abase r v9,1 (2.) L'v/-,lc - Sae_ &&-Jr,.1-U'ir=1, cy/cwico/ (4 eeofio</ 0ginprocrL A6 G If'/" M —'27— W° Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions , Not Approved i I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ••"\ M6/9/ • P1•anni 12-19; RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A p p 1 i cation : v•- .t€ 14,1>s ;.. •0, "1 1. " C' 14,4 W 1 ie IRA �v�thei3 6,1 9 1 e.c.• `$ 4 —"jella Location : (S a4seiae0O 9 a Applicant: SeravO Nie• A1C � ee.C.PA" ifreaa4= *VI V TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :_ Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department Sie.C. EO 00 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering i Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YuuhD'EI'AKTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING. DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved o AJZA �,I-�^..'-�-i4.. �-'d- �. .d-•....�-1e.� rra�eX �i1�2 '�- �' mil— G.���. Goa..Q�� �''r�-s-- signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date E- y--"27,r/ IEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVIS ON : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date _ • ii:;' Qi Planni -- ;1 12-19? RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT'APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : •,�� 9' "` . r- 4» : x ' lzi Eildps . -4 : o 71,..s...)it- a, ' sa� � � a 'fi ® �cepo1 cgalfa:if®�d)( .�Q.s�� ' r S �� �i6®90 ' Locati on . . '4 11 A , o App'l i cant: ietk er4o4Pp1 Akt•Ei. Al Vest TO: P s Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :_ Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department Z tee• oe eo Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITTNG FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF 'Nun D'EPAKTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0U P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0, /( c_e__ I Approved f , Approved with Conditions Not Approved /Pt 1 /,--e-A4-4-L, Si nature of Director or Authorized Representative 2-3- �� , p tative Date i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved - l C III 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Jja6f9/ Plannin' 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW. SHEET Application : 4r J." 3: Ai; 1. ; : ,; =, r 6 rr& la c k,.•. 7749 At -° e • d• Location : t, . -,,,, .1 �. _, - " ° tgsl 5' CB �lISSO r -I. r r ��' Applicant : evi eon A1e. A/E a 14tecock- I riftemi-le Vat 0 i TO: Parks. Department SCHEDULED BEARING DATE ._ Police Department A. R. C. tMEETING DATE : Public ks Department 4E• H. ¢� o 0 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : ! COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION .SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITTNG FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC)� TO BE HELD ON AT 9:U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE' ROOM. IF Your% D'Et'AKTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ' Approved Approved with Conditions ' Not Approved' ) No LLc cPSS •O f-r O4 He Z814'.S`-1- Z� ?y 0 v r c/ p,,,,, � � pa q-C e l �v b e u s � a� Ge�%✓ a G ro �S ) , w, f1 o J e )9Y-o l / V- Y c 4 r os-- Cle_Te.-.-T -, r-e,I t-^i ) S., Signature of Director or Authorized Repres n a ve Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : , Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ..)ja619 Planni 12-19: RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET App11 dpb Lois � �/6 ll® or 4114 Applicant : Alt erde9o1 Aloe. ecock- 3 rnetAc_ Vet En TO: Parks Department ' SCHEDULED HEARING DATE , Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department a 0 ° 1 i Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Bui)ling Division ti,lities Engineering Fire' Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITTNG FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:u0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUIN DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved ,,//' Approved with Conditions Not Approved / -z%e 'S 4>A947. .S'///PLC i i tom% 4-/77/ 4 !`-iiek i;-/C' ie- 1,Jic- S Gt z js ,C7l 'see-Z3 70. c`-' ,1' ToADa/Ay /1 D ;_csy a- /'.!/S 2 , 1/ ' L9Cw 1//C /� CdLCS . .lGl CGjit f 7� //�i0lc dJl %Cs ((// Signature of Director or Au orized;.Representative D to REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,iL 7 Approved ✓ Approved with Conditions., Approved 0 ;1O( . Cd= eifs cik.1 T. -ALL— 3/3/4( Signature of Director or. Authorized Representative Date 1I it • . I I UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO • LATE COMERS AGREEMENT - WATER I No LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER No SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CIJARGE • WATER Yi:S -U+(sc SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER Yc c t lam' FT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER iro SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER Y6-5 APPROVED WATER PLAN yE5 APPROVED SEWER PLAN I Yd APPRYED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. ye5 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS No 1� FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : ' PP-079-80 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-593-80 bescription of Proosal: Proposal for 11-lot preliminary plat of single family homes Proponent: • MARK HECOCK Location of Proposal: North side of N.E. 28th Street between Kennewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on February 19, 1981 , following a presentation by Roger J. Blaylocklof the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-593-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental: Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson, Assistant Planner DATER: November 8, 1980 2) Applications: PP-079-80 Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. • An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 03'0 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist 'and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Will not adversely affect adjacent properties. Signatures : /(117 // Ron Nelson, Building Director vid R. Clemens, Acting Planning Director /j êc. H'ougcting Public Works Directo DATE OF PUBLICATION: FEBRUARY 22, 1981 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: MARCH 8, 1981 • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 24, 1981, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. EDEN ESTATES (MARK HECOCK AND PETER TIERSMA)' Applications for preliminary plat approval of 11-lot single family subdivision, file PP-079-80, and exceptions from the Subdivision Ordinance regarding access to allow a cul-de-sac of 700 feet in length along with a reduced width of 25 feet and the creation of three pipestem lots, files E-021-81, E-022-81, and E-023-81; property located on the north side of N.E. 28th Street between Kennewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. 2. DAVID G. WOODCOCK, JR. Applications for rezone from R-2 to R-3, file R-015-81, and special permit to allow parking lot addition for existing adjacent medical/dental clinic, file SP-016-81; property located at 123 Pelly Avenue North Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 24, 1981, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED: March 8, 1981 DAVID R. CLEMENS ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 6th day of March, 1981. `� .•- e.;>74%.. SIGNED:d244.4L7garu4p1A Renton City Council 6/2/80 Page 4 OLD BUSINESS Councilman Shane inquired regarding the Wes Williams retention Retention of of farm animals matter and was advised by the City Attorney Farm Animals that it is not appropriate for Council to discuss a matter that is pending in Municipal court and further that one Council cannot bind another except by ordinance or signed contract. Wells Ave. Councilman Shane inquired regarding the Wells Ave. bridge and Bridge was advised by Public Works Director Gonnason that determination was made for environmental assessment , however Federal Highway Commission may require a full environmental impact statement and in that event , additional funds will be required. Improvements for Councilman Shane inquired regarding petition on Garden Ave. Garden Ave. N. improvements and was advised by Public Works Director that Council terminated the LID because more than 60% protest received on the project. Gonnason noted that he had advised PacCar of off-site improvement requirement with building permit request and their obligation for improvements in front of the trunk center which had been previously deferred. City Shops Councilman Reed inquired regarding negotiations with King County for proposed shop site. Gonnason noted authorization had been requested from City Council and referred to the Community Services Committee. Reed submitted Council Minutes of 8/6/79 and 4/14/80 and explained 9/17/79 Council approval of negotiations . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROKHILL, ADMINISTRATION PROCEED WITH NEGOTI- ATION PROCESS TO OBTAIN CITY SHOP SITE, 13.5 ACRES EAST OF THE PRESENT COUNTY SHOP SITE NEAR COUNTY TRANSFER STATION IN RENTON HIGHLANDS AREA. Gonnason explained 3.5 acres of area is hillside, possibly unuseable, but it will be included in the appraisal . MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND REED, THE ADMINISTRATION MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE AS TO NECESSITY/SELECTION OF ARCHITECTS FOR THE CITY SHOPS PROJECT. Following discussion wherein Council members called for a sturdy appropriate structure and not a monument , MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO INVESTIGATE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY STRUCTURE ON SHOP SITE WHEN PROPERTY SECURED. CARRIED. Councilman Shane left the Council meeting and was excused by Mayor Shinpoch. King County Moved by Stredicke, Second Reed, City of Renton notify County of District Court King of termination of rental space for the Justice Courts in City Hall . Mayor Shinpoch advised the Court had requested some form of notification to be better able to seek other space. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY ROCKHILL, SECOND STREDICKE, CITY OF RENTON NOTIFY KING COUNTY OF OUR INTENT NOT TO RENEGOTIATE LEASE AND URGE THEM TO SECURE SUITABLE SPACE WITHIN THE CITY. CARRIED. Robertson Transportation Committee Chairman Stredicke noted Robertson Aircraft Aircraft, sub-tenant of Boeing on airport leased property, will be leaving the airport at the request of Boeing who will be removing or remodeling to enlarge the structure on the field. Robertson plans to relocate at Everett. Committee is investigating effect of rebuilding on Compass Rose and will be reporting Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill submitted Development committee report re referral of 4/28/80 for completion of plats Committee in phases (Eden Estates) . The committee determined the present Plat Development code adequately covered the situation and recommended no Council action on this item. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Burnett Street The committee reported L-1 light industry zoning on some property Linear Park adjoining the Burnett Linear Park and recommended the matter be referred to the Planning Department for recommendation regarding appropriate zoning in order to prevent any future problems. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. MOVED BY STREDICKE. SECOND ROCKHILL, AMEND COMMITTEE RECOMMENDA- TION TO CHANGE THE WORD "new" TO "appropriate" zoning. CARRIED. CARRIED. 1 . RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 28 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROBERT HUGHES, COUNCIL RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN W. REED. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER CHARLES F. SHANE. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant ; RAY CALDWELL, Police Dept . ; BRUCE PHILLIPS, Fire Dept. MINUTE APPROVAL Councilman Hughes requested correction to the minutes re cabaret ordinance that neither male or female go go dancing contributed to the betterment of the community. (Page 3) MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND HUGHES, TO APPROVE MINUTES OF 4/21/80 AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Michael Hanis, 405 So. 4th Renton, representing Whitewater Constr. , Mr. Hecock (Eden Estates) . Mr. Hanis requested council review present city code,which does not state that plats can be completed in phases Development of as being requested for the development of Eden Estates as they are Eden Estates unable to meet the conditions re access. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, TO REFER MATTER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND POSSIBLE CODE REVISION. CARRIED. Lakeview Towers Robin Little, 264 Maple Ave. NW, stated his opinion that the building permit for Lakeview Towers Condominiums should not be renewed and the city should once again consider designating the property as single family residence. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included : U.S. Dept. of Police Chief requested authorization for Mayor and City Clerk to Justice-Agreement sign Agreement with U.S. Department of Justice for confinement for Confinement of prisoners held by their agencies subject to space available. of Prisoners Council approve. Warranty on New Fire Chief requested reimbursement of money paid from equipment Apparatus- maintenance account (warranty on new apparatus) in the amount Reimbursement of $566. 14. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Police Officer Mayor Shinpoch appointed Brian J. Wilson to the position of Police Appointment Officer in the Renton Police Department effective May 1 , 1980, subject to the customary six-month probationary period. Appointment to fill a departmental vacancy created by retirement. Council confirm. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Approval CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Flood Wed Edens of Federal Emergency Management Agency was unable to Hazard unattend due to a Special Meeting being held by the City of Kent. Presentation of the completed flood plan hazard maps in connection with the City of Renton will be rescheduled. OLD BUSINESS City Insurance Due to the present status of the city insurance it was MOVED BY REED, SECOND STREDICKE, TO REFER MATTER OF THE CITY INSURANCE TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Renton City Council 4/28/80 Page 2 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following Ordinances for second and final readings: ORDINANCE #3420 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Beale Rezone properties within the City from General Classification District (G) R-002-80 to Business District (B-1 ) and Residence Multiple Family (R-3) . Property located in the vicinity of 1320 Union Ave. NE. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYES: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED: 1-NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3421 An ordinance was read creating a special fund known as Cumulative Cumulative Reserve Fund #3421 for the purpose of fund accumulation for Reserve construction and installation of trunk sewer lines in the Honey- creek and Kennydale areas as described in Ordinance #3409. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYES: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED; 1-NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3422 An ordinance was read amending a portion of the City Code relating Cabaret to cabarets and conduct of employees or entertainers therein. Amendment MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3423 An ordinance was read making it a violation to abuse or torment Animal Abuse animals used by Police agencies and establishing penalties. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3424 An ordinance was read amending a portion of the City Code relating Trunk Line Charges to facility and trunk connection charges and establishing a trunk for Entire City line service area in the Honeycreek and Kennydale areas and establishing the amount of said trunk line service charge upon connection to the public sewer and increasing such charges annually. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4-AYES:TRIMM,CLYMER,HUGHES, ROCKHILL; 1-NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Excuse Councilman MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, TO EXCUSE COUNCILMAN RUD WHO Reed WAS CALLED AWAY. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3425 An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer Publication of of funds in the amount of $1 ,000 to provide for publication of Environment environmental determinations. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, Determinations TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3426 An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer of Advance Travel funds in the amount of $1 ,000 to provide sufficent funds for advance payments of travel expense of City officials and employees. MOVED CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3427 An ordinance was read establishing a new fund to be known as the City Shop "City Shop Relocation Fund". Fund number designation #3427. Relocation Fund MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3428 An ordinance was read prohibiting overnight parking of certain Overnight trailers, buses, and commercial trucks in residential areas Parking of the City and providing a penalty for the violation thereof. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, STREDICKE; 1-NO: TRIMM. CARRIED. MC .�PLANNINC AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO : Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE : Eden Estates Appeal PP430-79 , E449-79 and E450-79 • The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the above mentioned recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner dated December 28 , 1979 , and recommends that the City Council-modify the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner based upon the following errors of fact and law: 1. Conclusion No . 4 is in error in that except for the access street to the subdivision,• this preliminary plat request meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and must be .approved subject to the develop- ment of the access street to satisfy the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. The Committee recommends that the City Council modify the recom- • mendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner to approve the plat subject to development of N.E . 28th Street to comply with the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance . The Committee further recommends that the City Council affirm the Land Use Hearing Examiner ' s denial of both exception applications . The Committee further recommends that the City Council refer to the Administration the applicants ' request for a refund of the exception fee for exception from the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance relating to maximum length of a cul-de-sac . . Randy Rockhill , Chairman ) Earl C ymer • John Reed RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting January 28 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; JOHN W. REED, RICHARD M. COUNCIL STREDICKE, RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT J. HUGHES, EARL CLYMER. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, ABSENT COUNCILMAN CHARLES F. SHANE BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. Councilman Shane arrived momentarily. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative IN ATTENDANCE Assistant; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; BRUCE PHILLIPS, Fire Department; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Public Works Department; JOHN BUFF, Police Department; W. E. BENNETT, Deputy Finance Director. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JANUARY 21 ,. 1980 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. SPECIAL AWARD Mayor Shinpoch announced award received from King County Board Senior Center of Realtors for favorable impact of Senior Center on the community; award to be displayed in the Planning Department. AUDIENCE COMMENT Nadine Brown, 2005 NE 51st St. , asked that Agenda Item 8.b. be presented. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, CHANGE THE ORDER OF COUNCIL BUSINESS AND PRESENT AGENDA ITEMS 8.a. and b. AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. Preliminary Plat The Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman recommended denial of Eden Estates preliminary plat application by Mark Hecock and Peter Tiersma Hecock/Tiersma for plat of Eden Estates, an eight lot single family subdivision. Appeal The applicants requested exceptions from the Subdivision PP-430-79 and Ordinance for right-of-way width and cul-de-sac length; located E-449-79 on NE 28th St. between Kennewick P1 . NE and Aberdeen Ave. NE. E-450-79 Appeal was filed by Michael Hanis, Attorney for applicants and claimed errors in law and fact in Examiner's decision. Continued Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report recommending Council modify the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner based on the following errors of fact and law: Conclusion No. 4 is in error as the preliminary plat meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and must be approved subject to the development of the access street to satisfy provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. The committee recommended that the Council modify the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner to approve the plat subject to development of ' NE 28th St. to comply with said Subdivision Ordinance; also that Council affirm the Examiner's denial of both exception applica- tions. The committee further recommended that Council refer to the Administration, the applicants request for refund of . the filing fee or that exception from the Subdivision Ordinance relating to maximum length of a cul-se-sac. Continued Mike Hanis, 405 S 4th, representing Hecock and Tiersma, agreed with committee decision except regarding roadway. Hanis used maps and explained vicinity and history, objected to 50 ft. roadway noting that would be the same as required for Glencoe. Hanis asked Council concur in recommendation of committee except ' to approve 25 ft. road. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CON- CUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, Committee Chairman Rockhill explained events leading to committee' s recommendation which is recommendation originally submitted by the Planning Department, that the problem is in the access. Councilman-.Stredicke inquired Renton City Council 1/28/80 Page 2 Appeal of if buildings can be constructed and occupied prior to roadway Eden Estates completion. Attorney Warren explained plat improvements should PP-430-79 and be installed and improved, then indivydual lots in plat can be E-449-79 and subdivided and individually developed; could not be occupancy E-450-79 permit issued until plats approved and buildings themselves approved by the City. Councilman Stredicke requested the record indicate Attorney. Warren's response re non-occupancy until com- pletion of roadway facilities. Motion to accept the Planning and Development Committee report CARRIED. Charles Brown Lad Use Hearing Examiner's recommendation for approval with Temporary Permit conditions of application by Charles R. Brown, 2005 NE 51st TP-437-79 and St. , for temporary permit to allow continuation of an existing Appeal of trucking operation on a site located in residential zone. Conditions Appeal was filed by Charles Stixrud, 4202 Wallingford N. , Seattle, on behalf of Charles R. Brown seeking modification of conditions 1 and 1 (b) to permit the limited right to use three of Brown's trucks until temporary permit expires or until August 31 , 1980. Letters from Phyllis Ragar, 1.1209 SE 74th, and Leslie and Gayle Baumgartner reported no objections to the special permit. Letter from Charles and Nadine Brown to the Planning and Development Committee requested withdrawal of appeal with the understanding that the conditions of the temporary permit will be in effect until 8/31/80. Continued Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill submitted committee report noting review of Hearing Examiner's decision of 12/28/79 and Charles Brown letter of 1/24/80 withdrawing appeal , and recommended that the City Council affirm the decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Councilman Stredicke recalled history of the matter and inquired regarding the equipment held by the truking business; Mrs. Nadine Brown explained. Rockhill noted equitable solution had been reached for all parties concerned. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke inquired re complaint of resident of single family area for misuse of property, City Attorney Warren explained the City is responsible to investigate complaint and take steps necessary to alleviate situation; if not alleviated then City has right and duty to issue citation, or initiate suit for injunction. Mayor's Report MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, ALLOW AGENDA SPACE FOR MAYOR'S REPORT. CARRIED.' . Mayor Shinpoch explained for Council 's awareness that the City is providing space in the Highlands Administration Building (for- mer Historical Society .location) for the Clothes Rank which serves 300 persons monthly and is a non-profit organization. Firefighter arbitration award for longevity of 2-4-6-8% rather than dollar figure City had desired. Nancy Matthews elected Chairperson of the Park Board. Suburban Mayors dinner at Bellevue Athletic Club Wed. 2/6/80 6:30, all Councilmembers invited; reservations by 1st. Mayor Shinpoch announced a preliminary plan designated E.R.C. (Environmental Review Committee) ' consisting of Directors of Planning, Parks and Public Works Dept. with tie-in to Police and Fire Dept. for the purpose of avoiding duplication of effort to establish a single responsible lead agency to determine extent of significant environmental impact, varying degrees of impact or declaration of non-significance. That most important function of the E.R.C. is to assure depart- ments are working cooperatively in a timely fashion and determin- ing areas of responsibility; ordinance changes will be required. The Animal Control Officer has requested Council time for sug- gestions regarding his job. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL REFER MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Census Bureau is looking for enumerators for 1980 census which would be two weeks duration, require one hour test; names of interested persons will be forwarded. Renton is hosting Fire Suppression Seminar at Sheraton Inn 1/28-30/80. a r , , i Y Renton City Council 1/28/80 Page 2 Appeal of if buildings can be constructed and occupied prior to roadway Eden Estates completion. Attorney Warren explained plat improvements should PP-430-79 and be installed and improved, then individual lots in plat can be E-449-79 and subdivided and individually developed; could not be occupancy E-450-79 permit issued until plats approved and buildings themselves approved by the Ci.ty. Councilman Stredicke requested the record indicate Attorney Warren's response re non-occupancy until com- pletion of roadway facilities. Motion to accept the Planning and Development Committee report CARRIED. .!0+" Charles Brown Land Use Hearing Examiner's recommendation for approval with Temporary Permit conditions of application by Charles R. Brown, 2005 NE 51st TP-437-79 and St. , for temporary permit to allow continuation of an existing Appeal of trucking operation on a site located in residential zone. Conditions Appeal was filed by Charles Stixrud, 4202 Wallingford N. , Seattle, on behalf of Charles R. Brown seeking modification. of conditions 1 and 1 (b) to permit the limited right to use three of Brown's trucks until temporary permit expires or until August 31 , 1980. Letters from Phyllis Ragar, 1.1209 SE 74th, and Leslie and Gayle Baumgartner reported no objections to the special permit. Letter from Charles and Nadine Brown to the Planning and Development Committee requested withdrawal of appeal with the understanding that the conditions of the temporary permit will be in effect until 8/31/80. Continued Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill submitted committee report noting review of Hearing Examiner's decision of 12/28/79 and Charles Brown letter of 1/24/80 withdrawing, appeal , and recommended that the City Council affirm the decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Councilman Stredicke recalled history of the matter and inquired regarding the equipment held by the truking business; Mrs. Nadine Brown explained. Rockh.ill noted equitable solution had been reached for all parties concerned. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke inquired re complaint of resident of single family area for misuse of property, City Attorney Warren explained the City is responsible to investigate- complaint and take steps necessary to alleviate situation; if not alleviated then City has right and duty to issue citation or initiate suit for injunction. Mayor's Report MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND HUGHES, ALLOW AGENDA SPACE FOR MAYOR' S 'REPORT. CARRIED. Mayor Shinpoch explained for Council 's awareness that the City is providing space in the Highlands Administration Building (for- mer Historical Society .location) for the Clothes Rank which serves 300 persons monthly and is a non-profit organization. Firefighter arbitration award for longevity of 2-4-6-8% rather than dollar figure City had desired. Nancy Matthews elected Chairperson of the Park Board. Suburban Mayors dinner at Bellevue Athletic Club Wed. 2/6/80 6:30, all Councilmembers invited; reservations by 1st. Mayor Shinpoch announced a preliminary plan designated E.R.C. (Environmental Review Committee) consisting of Directors of Planning, Parks and Public Works Dept. with tie-in to Police and Fire Dept. for the purpose of avoiding duplication of effort to establish a single responsible lead agency to determine extent of significant environmental impact, varying degrees of impact or declaration of non-significance. That most important function of the E.R.C. is to assure depart- ments are working cooperatively in a timely fashion and determin- ing areas of responsibility; ordinance changes will be required. The Animal Control Officer has requested Council time for sug- gestions regarding his job. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL REFER MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE, FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Census Bureau is looking for enumerators for 1980 census which would be two weeks duration, require one hour test; names of interested persons will be forwarded. Renton is hosting Fire Suppression Seminar -at Sheraton Inn 1/28-30/80. RENTON CITY COUNCIL ' Regular Meeting January 28 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; JOHN W. REED, RICHARD M. COUNCIL STREDICKE, RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT J. HUGHES, EARL CLYMER. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, ABSENT COUNCILMAN CHARLES F. SHANE BE EXCUSED. CARRIED. Councilman Shane arrived momentarily. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH', Mayor; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative IN ATTENDANCE Assistant; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; BRUCE PHILLIPS, Fire Department; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Public Works Department; JOHN BUFF, Police Department; W. E. BENNETT, Deputy Finance Director. PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JANUARY 21 , 1980 AS WRITTEN. ' CARRIED. SPECIAL AWARD Mayor Shinpoch announced award received from King County Board Senior Center of Realtors for favorable impact of Senior Center on the community; award to be displayed in the Planning Department. AUDIENCE COMMENT Nadine Brown, 2005 NE 51st St. , asked that Agenda Item 8.b. be presented. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND ROCKHILL, CHANGE THE ORDER OF COUNCIL BUSINESS AND PRESENT AGENDA ITEMS 8.a. and b. AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. Preliminary Plat The Land Use Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman recommended denial of Eden Estates preliminary plat application by Mark Hecock and Peter Tiersma Hecock/Tiersma for plat of Eden Estates, an eight lot single family subdivision. Appeal The applicants requested exceptions from the Subdivision PP-430-79 and Ordinance for right-of-way width and cul-de-sac length; located E-449-79 on NE 28th St. between Kennewick P1 . NE and Aberdeen Ave. NE. E-450-79 Appeal was filed by Michael Hanis, Attorney for applicants and claimed errors in law, and fact in Examiner's decision. Continued Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented committee report recommending Council modify the recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner based on the following errors of fact and law: Conclusion No. 4 is in error as the preliminary plat meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and must be approved subject to the development of the access street to satisfy provisions of the Subdivision .Ordinance. The committee recommended that the Council modify the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner to approve th,e plat subject to development of NE 28th St. to comply with said Subdivision Ordinance; also that Council affirm the Examiner's 'denial of both exception applica- tions. The committee further recommended that Council refer to the Administration, the applicants request for refund of the filing fee or that exception from the Subdivision Ordinance relating to maximum length of 'a cul-se-sac. Continued Mike Hanis, 405 S 4th, representing Hecock and Tiersma, agreed with committee decision except regarding roadway. Hanis used maps and explained vicinity and history, objected to 50 ft. roadway noting that would be the same as. required for Glencoe. Hanis asked Council concur in recommendation of committee except to approve 25 ft. road. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, CON- CUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, Committee Chairman Rockhill explained events leading to committee's recommendation which is recommendation originally submitted by the Planning Department, that the problem is in the access. Councilman. Stredicke inquired F 4� OF ;$ OZ OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON,WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON: 98055 255-8678' °' LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 17, o9gT�D sEFSE�O�Q January 28, 1980 TO-: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Daniel Kellogg, Assistant City Attorney . Re: Eden Estates Appeal - Appellants ' request for refund of filing fee The Planning and Development Committee. has recommended that the City Council refer the Appellants ' request for refund of their exception application fee to the Administration for recommendation. It appears in this case that application for an exception from the Subdivision Ordinance at the suggestion of the Planning Department would not have been necessary in that N.E . 28th Street is not a cul-de-sac but is a platted street. However, it would be our recommendation that the City should. not refund filing fees once paid. The applicant is responsible to determine the propriety of any particular application. Any assistance that the staff may make is given without considera- tion and solely in an attempt to be helpful to the applicant. The City incurs substantial expense by way of staff time as well as advertisement and posting of the. hearing notices , which the application fee is intended to reimburse, at least in part. Daniel e logg - DK:nd of RA,A �. A ,y THE CITY OF RENTON `� ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 oNIL CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 co- FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 P January 14, 1980 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. PP-430-79, E-449-79, E-450-79; Mark Hecock & Peter Tiersma - Plat of Eden Estates; Appeal of Examiner's Recommendation. Dear Council Members: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced application was forwarded to you on January 4, 1980. On January 11, 1980, an appeal was accepted by the City Clerk within the established appeal period. Due to receipt of the appeal and to allow additional time for review of this matter, the application will be rescheduled on the City Council agenda ofc5anuary 28 198S If you require additional information or assistance, please contact our office. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk OF R4,,, THE CITY• OF RENTON `$ ® z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • QELORES A. MEAD 0 43• CITY CLERK 04.14 SEP1tsr% January 14, 1980 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 14th day of January, 1980, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at • Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail , to all parties of record, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY MICHAEL HANI.S, ATTORNEY, FOR MARK :4':HECOCK AND PETER TIERSMA, EDEN ESTATES, PRELIMINARY PLAT PP-430-79, E-449-79, E-450-79. Delores A. Mead,' City lerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO . BEFORE me this 14th day of January, 1980. Notary Public in and for the, State of Washington, residing in King County st . OF � A o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ ® z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n rn BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR • QELORES A. MEAD 090 �• CITY CLERK 0 � 9q��0 SEPP January 14,. 1980 APPEAL FILED BY MICHAEL .M. HANIS, ATTORNEY FOR MARK , HECOC.K AND PETER TIERSMA RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated December 28, 1979, Eden Estates, Preliminary Plat PP-430-79, E-449-79, and E-450-79 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the public records office on January 11., 1980, along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, •Ch. 30, City Code as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by ' the Council 's Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council January 28, 1980 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. South. Yours very truly, , CITY OF RENTON 72 pahstW /..Ziae/ Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st NEE COPIES TO: SENT CITY ATTORNEY''S.,CiFFICE / \ RECORD CHRONICLE (PRESS) ' MAYOR' S OFFICE. -1- --- 4'75 .)( CITY COUNCIL 0 11( ' ' 1 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ,i. HEARING EXAMINER k/4 `'`" , y Kr PLANNING DEPARTMENT / PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR /1 PARK DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT , y - (--,PO,,, 44/s•o 4 te.,,-A-434- ,1_, , 1 ,x. ,,,,,i.„,/ On;s 1, 1.7,n I y(//:gy/2/.50-ii Y . LAW OFFICES OF Offices: AUBURN HARPOLD, HANIS, COMBS & FIORI RENTON GEORGE FIORI,JR. MICHAEL M.HANIS Reply to: 405 SOUTH FOURTH DAVID L.HARPOLD LOREN D.COMBS RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 DAVID A.LITTLE TELEPHONE: (206) 228-1301 January 11, 1980 Renton City Clerk Renton City Hall Renton, WA 98055 • • Dear Madam Clerk: t Enclosed herewith is a Notice of Appeal of Mark Heacock and Peter Tiersma; Plat of Eden Estates; file #PP-430-79 , E-449-79 , E-450-79 . Also enclosed is our check in the amount of $25. 00 for the appeal fee. ' ;4 Very truly yours, HARPOLD, HANIS, COPES & FIORI Michael M. Hanis MMH:ad enclo. v /r/10;' t%0 '-s `ti 4F� SYs\1 ( a • J• r�]i \'k S gym' f NOTICE OF APPEAL Mark Heacock and Peter Tiersma hereby appeal the Hearing Examiner' s decision dated December 28 , 1979 on files #PP-430-79 , E-449-79, and E-450-79 . This appeal is made for the reason that there are substantial errors in law and fact in the Examiner' s decision. The errors include the following: 1. The applicant was required to request an extension to the ordinance regarding the length of cul-de-sacs. In fact, based upon the ordinances of the City of Renton, there was no cul-de-sac violating the length restrictions under the ordinances, as was pointed out by the Engineering Department in its report to the Examiner, and no exception from the subdivision ordi- nance should have been required. 2. The examiner' s finding that there "are a number of undeveloped parcels in the area which seem to be similarly situated as far as access in concerned" is incorrect. The location of this property, and particularly the fact it is backed by King County park property which cannot be developed, make it unique from any other properties in the area. The property is most similar to the Werstiuk PUD, in which case a 25 foot right of way was allowed for access to the property. The Werstiuk property will have a much higher population and density than proposed by this applicant. The Werstiuk project approval was conditioned upon an addi- tional 25 feet of access being provided upon develop- ment of adjacent land. In fact, the adjacent land is county park, and will never be developed. Such a con- dition on this project would have meaning, and the appli- cant has proposed it; the Examiner' s decision fails to consider this alternative. 3. The Examiner concludes that there are no sidewalks, and therefore there can be no safe pedestrian move- ment. This conclusion is incorrect. Because of the location of the property, the mode of development in the area, and alternate sources of public access, safe pedestrian movement can be accomplished by the applicant. 4. The Examiner concludes that the area near the applicant' s property which has already developed should not be burdened with additional traffic and safety problems which development on this parcel would bring. In essence, the Examiner is concluding that this property should not be afforded the same treatment as other property in the area, and the applicant should not be allowed to use its property consistent with uses by other property owners in the area. There is absolutely no evidence in the record to support the Examiner' s conclusion that there will be additional traffic and safety problems caused by this eight-lot development. Any such effect on existing development areas would be negligible. 5. The Examiner concludes that granting this application with the exceptions as requested would create precedents in the area. This is not the case. The property is so uniquely located that no other property in the area would be able to assert the same bases for exception to the ordinances. 6. The Examiner concludes that this development is premature. In fact, the Planning Commission and the City of Council determined over four years ago that development of this property was appropriate. The record shows that the development was allowed for six lots, and the restriction to six lots was based largely upon the facts that higher density development would cause removal of trees in the area. Those trees have been removed by a prior owner. This is a substantial change in the circumstances of the property which would now justify a somewhat higher density of development.. Further, the property behind, to the north of this property is now owned by King County, has been developed by HUD funds, and can now never be used for private purposes. The concerns about access through this plat to other properties, and other development of that property in the area no longer exsist. No changes in the circumstance of the property have occurred which would indicate a lesser density of development, or denial of the application. 7. The Examiner stated that removal of trees from the property by a prior owner was a case of an applicant creating its own hardship, and therefore an increase in lots based upon the change in circumstance of the property would not necessarily be justified. In fact, removal of the trees created no hardship. The property owner at the time who removed the trees had every legal right to do so as owner of the property. The fact that the owner did remove the trees to the possible chagrin of other persons is not a valid reason for refusing to consider the changed nature of the property. The property should be examined, and decisions made regarding it, based upon its character at the time of application. In conclusion, all justification for development of the property that existed in 1975 continues to exist today. Those sub- stantial changes in the property which have occurred would justify greater density development. The applicant has proposed eight lots, each to be over 15,000 square feet, well over double that required by the zoning in the area. The intent of the city' s ordi- nances regarding access and safety can be met by the applicant as the application is proposed, in spite of the fact that there will not be letter-of-the-law compliance with ordinances. This is exactly the type of situation that justifies exception from the ordinances. The tenor of the Examiner' s decision is that an exception cannot be granted because the development would then not be in compliance with the ordinances. In fact, the exception procedure is for the specific purpose of allowing property to be developed, although not strictly in compliance with ordinances, when the circumstances justify, and the public good can be promoted. Such is the case of this application. It is respectfully requested that the decision of the Examiner be modified or overturned, and that this plat and the exceptions necessary thereto be approved as requested by the applicant. HARPOLD, HANIS, COMBS & FIORI MICHAEL M. H S Attorneys for Applicant • CITY OF RENTON No. 12098 FINANCE DEPARTMENT RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 1 / 19 RECEIVED OF F;ti DO 1 - HOP .TOTAL .•?'C13 Get-.? GWEN E. MARSHALL, FINANCE DIRECTOR BY pH R •• o THE CITY OF RENTON 4$ 0 z 11/ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o a CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 t' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gT�D SEP1 s- January 4,. 1980 . Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: . File No.. PP-430-79, E-449-79, E-450-79; Mark Hecock & Peter Tiersma; Plat of Eden Estates. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced preliminary'plat request, dated December 28, 1979. The appeal period for the application expires on January 11, 1980, and the report is being forwarded to, you for review by the Planning and Development.Committee following the seven day period from the date, of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk. on January 14, 1980, and will be placed on the Council agenda on January 21, 1980.. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact our office. Sincerely,, vjz Fred' J. Kaufman • Hearing. Examiner cc: Planning.Department City Clerk. Attachment AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen / , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: • That on the 28th day of December , 19 79 . , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a. sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. 1 . Subscribed and sworn thiso2g day of 197 ,' . Notary Public in and for -the State of Washington, residing at Renton 'Application, Petition or Case: Plat of Eden Estates (Mark Hecock) ; PP-430-79 (The minate4 contain a tiAt o16 the paAtieo o tecond) • December 28, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON • REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. • APPLICANT: Mark Hecock & Peter Tiersma; FILE NO. PP-430-79, Plat of Eden Estates E-449-79, E-450-79 LOCATION: On N.E. 28th Street between Kennewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests preliminary plat approval of an eight lot single family subdivision; and exceptions from the Subdivision Ordinance for right-of-way width and cul-de-sac length. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval of preliminary plat and RECOMMENDATION: exception for cul-de-sac length with conditions; Denial' of exception for right-of-way width. Hearing Examiner: Denial. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by ' REPORT: the Examiner on November 2, 1979; a supplementary report was received on December 14, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened. on November 6, 1979 at 9:12 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, advised the necessity to continue the public hearing to allow application for exceptions for access width and cul-de-sac length•. The Examiner subsequently continued the hearing to December 4, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers. . CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on December 4, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Being advised that additional time was required in order to complete application for necessary exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance, the Examiner continued the hearing to December 18, 1979. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was opened on December 18, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, dated November 6, 1979 as well as a supplementary report, dated December• 18, 1979. The reports were entered into the record as Exhibits #1 and 2, respectively. • Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibits #1 and 2, and entered the following • additional exhibit into the record: • Exhibit #3: Preliminary. Plat as submitted • • Mr. Blaylock corrected Section B.3, Agencies/Departments Contacted, of Exhibit #2, and noted that a response has been received from the Traffic Engineering Division and is attached to the report. He also noted that one of five conditions placed on the plat i,n 1976 relating to. retention of existing vegetation has been modified due 'to removal of trees by the .property owner at that time. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding whether N.E. 28th Street is open west of Aberdeen, Mr. .Blaylock advised that the roadway contains a width of 25 feet and is unimproved at that point. He also indicated that design problems due to proximity of existing residences near Kennewick Avenue N.E. would create difficulties in widening the roadway. Mr. Blaylock corrected the Planning Department + V PP-430-79 Page Two recommendation from approval of both exceptions to denial of the exception relating to right-of-way width. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Michael Hanis 405 S. 4th Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Hanis, attorney for the applicant, reviewed the prior preliminary plat application which had been approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 1976 subject to conditions. He noted that the purpose of reduction in density from ten to six lots by the Commission and Council was to protect existing trees on the property, but that following final action on the matter, the property owner had removed all of the trees, and this action had substantially changed the physical characteristics of the site. The Examiner noted that because an applicant may not create his own hardship, increasing the number of lots from six to eight is not necessarily justified. Mr. Hanis advised that the property has changed ownership twice since that time. Mr. Hanis also noted that an additional circumstantial change has occurred since the previous plat approval pertaining to status of property located north of the site which is now owned by King County. He advised that because the county is restricted from granting access, the previous questions regarding provision of access for future development of that property no longer exist. He also indicated that the. previous reduction to six lots rendered the project economically infeasible and the proposal for eight lots provides twice the lot size required by ordinance since the property can be divided into a maximum of 16 residential lots. Mr. Hanis indicated concurrence in the Planning Department recommendation to approve Exception No. 2 for cul-de-sac length, but requested a refund for exception fee if the Examiner concurs in the Engineering Division opinion that an exception is not necessary. He noted that denial of Exception No. 1 would preclude development and reasonable use of the property, and the residents desire to maintain the rural, wooded character of the area which would be destroyed by improvement of N.E. 28th Street to full right-of-way width. He also advised that acquisition of adjoining property is not possible; the City Council and Planning Commission had previously approved a 22-foot right-of-way; the Engineering Division, which will be responsible for maintaining the roadway, has recommended a 22-foot width; and traffic from only eight residences would be utilizing the right-of-way. Responding to the Planning Department concern for provision of pedestrian access, Mr. Hanis advised that King County plans includer:provision of a trail and bicycle system within county-owned property which will provide appropriate pedestrian access. The Examiner inquired how pedestrians will access to the.western half of N.E. 28th Street if sidewalks are not developed in the area of the proposed plat. Mr. Hanis advised that the applicant has no objection to development of sidewalks abutting the proposed plat and would agree to execute restrictive covenants for such installation as well as dedication of 25 feet along the south property line upon development and extension of N.E. 28th Street. He also referenced a recently approved Planned Unit Development, Werstiuk PUD, west of the subject site, which had been granted approval subject to provision of a 25-foot right-of-way with .a condition that the roadway would be widened upon availability of an additional 25 feet of property, which Mr. Hanis indicated would not occur under existing circumstances. Regarding widening and development of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. , Mr. Hanis referenced minutes of the City Council meeting of May 24, 1976, public hearing regarding Kennydale Firs Preliminary Plat, during which the City Attorney advised that it is illegal to require an applicant to improve a street which does not abut his property. The Examiner noted that if review reveals the inability to require improvement of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. , the subject application may be premature in regard to the number of lots requested. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department staff. Referencing earlier comments by Mr. Hanis regarding provision of access for Kennybrook Townhouses (Werstiuk) , west of the subject site, Mr. Blaylock advised that the 25-foot . right-of-way provides limited access for only residents of the development, and differs in that manner from the subject plat in which residents will utilize N.E. 28th Street, already serving existing residents. Regarding the requirement for improvement of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. , Mr. Blaylock clarified the recommendation which states that the roadway must be improved prior to development of the site, but' does not necessarily relegate responsibility for improvement to the applicant. Mr. Blaylock entered by reference the previous preliminary plat file, File No. PP-838-75, Kennydale Firs, as Exhibit #4, and reiterated information contained in the Special Studies Committee, Report of the Planning Commission, dated March 30, 1976, to clarify the original rationale of the Council and Commission for reduction of density in the plat •430-79 Page Three to six lots because it was determined that any greater number of lots would produce traffic congestion, safety hazards and limited access for emergency vehicles on a substandard right-of-way which serves other existing residences in the area. The Examiner requested clarification of the Planning Department recommendation for approval of the preliminary plat but denial of an exception request necessary to proceed with development. Mr. Blaylock indicated the departmental opinion that the exception request for street width is not warranted, and the economic hardship incurred by the applicant in providing the necessary street improvements does not justify approval of the exception request. The Examiner noted that the applicant does not own frontage along N.E. 28th Street from the subject site to Aberdeen Avenue N.E. , and therefore, that property should be developed prior to approval of a preliminary plat on the subject site. Mr. Blaylock indicated that the preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and other development in the area, and could be approved subject to provision of appropriate access improvement. Mr. Hanis advised that the access could be feasibly developed only on the condition that the density of the plat be increased to 16 lots which would be detrimental to the area, ' in his opinion. He noted that the inability to widen and improve the roadway is not due to economic hardship, but is due to unwillingness of the property owner to the east to allow access. He indicated that the departmental recommendation allows an increase from six to eight lots in the plat as a result of examination of the area and existence of substantial differences from the original approval. The Examiner requested final comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. PP-430-79, E-449-79 and E-450-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:00 a.m. FINDINGS,. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of an eight-lot single family preliminary plat together with exceptions for a right-of-way of less than the required width and a cul-de-sac of greater than the permitted length. 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is entered as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the; State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-729 (G-7200, General; Single Family Residential; minimum lot size, 7200 square feet) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 7. The subject property is approximately 2.9 acres. The applicant proposes developing an eight-lot single family subdivision on the subject property and each lot would be approximately 15,800 square feet. 8. The City Council, in 1975, approved a preliminary plat of six lots for the subject property after a recommendation of the Planning 'Commission. The applicant had applied for 10-lot plat at that time. . The plat was scaled down at that time because of various factors including natural vegetation on the site and because of the area's location in terms of access problems (see below) . The preliminary plat has lapsed. 9. The subject property rises from west to east at slopes varying from about 12 to 16%. The site is wooded and covered with natural vegetation. The previous owner cleared the site of the old growth timber. 10. The subject property fronts on N.E. 28th Street which is not a through street. The access to the property actually begins at N.E. 27th Street; then north on Aberdeen N.E. to N.E. 28th Street. The Planning Department indicates that this access is analogous to a cul-de-sac of 1020 feet in length since there is no outlet to the west from N.E. 28th Street. 410 PP-430-79 Page Four 11. N.E. 28th Street has a 25-foot right-of-way which is not maintained in the vicinity of the subject property. 12. Pursuant to Section 9-1108.7(H) , the right-of-way must be a minimum of 50 feet in width, whereas the applicant proposes a 25-foot right-of-way. The applicant has applied for an exception to this provision under Section 9-1109. 13. Because N.E. 28th Street is unopened, access to the site has been treated as if it were a cul-de-sac, and therefore, the applicant has applied for an exception to Section 9-1108.7 (D) , which limits the length of cul-de-sacs to 500 feet. 14. The area in which the subject property is located is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for single family development. 15. The area surrounding the subject property is developed almost primarily with single family homes. There are scattered residences to the south, west and east. Lot sizes in the area vary, but many are in excess of the minimum 7200 square foot lot size, usually two to three times that size. 16. The Planning Department recommended that the cul-de-sac exception be granted and that the right-of-way exception be denied. They recommended that the preliminary plat be approved, therefore, subject to the improvement of the access corridor beginning at N.E. 27th Street. 17. The applicant indicated that property for right-of-way is unavailable. They indicated that the improvement of the access would be too costly for a subdivision of this size and that is why the previous plat was allowed to lapse. 18. There are a number of undeveloped parcels in the area which seem to be similarly situated as far as access is concerned. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The subject property is located in an area which has seen scattered and sporadic development. The roads in the area are not developed to the required standards now in force in the City of Renton and in some instances there are no developed roadways 1 at all. Further development of the area without concomitant improvement of the access corridor would burden the existing roads, create probable safet .y. problems and endanger the public health and welfare. 2. The roadways in the area are generally substandard. There are no sidewalks for safe pedestrian movement. The roadway itself is generally less than 25 feet wide. The Planning Department has recommended that the preliminary plat be approved subject to the improvement of the corridor including that portion of Aberdeen Avenue N.E. from N.E. 27th Street to N.E. 28th Street as well as N.E. 28th Street from Aberdeen Avenue N.E. to the subject parcel. While such a conditional approval would permit the applicant to develop the plat at the time the right-of-way is developed to safely accommodate the additional traffic in the area, it is obvious that such approval would be fruitless because of the inordinate expense involved in purchasing right-of-way and improving it to standards. 3. The record indicates that the previous plat of six lots expired because the improvement of the right-of-ways was too costly. At the same time, that area already developed should not be burdened with additional traffic and safety problems which development on this parcel will bring. Approval of the subject proposal with the exception is unwarranted and would create a precedent in the area. There are a number of undeveloped parcels and if each were to be similarly treated, the stage would be set for more development in areas which are not capable of handling such development. New subdivisions in other areas of the city have been required to meet standards for their various access roads, and to permit this applicant to develop the subject parcel without the required improvements would be to grant the applicant a special privilege not afforded to other property owners in similar situations. The Subdivision Ordinance was amended to provide safer, wider, fully improved right-of-ways including sidewalks, curbs and gutters. 4. Denial of the request is more appropriate than conditioning development at this time on certain road improvements which are not immediately achievable. The further • PP-430-79 Page Five development of the area in which the subject property is located without the necessary road improvement is premature, would unduly burden the existing roadway, endanger the public health, safety and welfare, and grant the applicant a special privilege and create the precedent for other development in less than adequately ' serviced areas of the city without benefit of the provisions and protections of the Subdivision Ordinance. Approval of the plat and denial of the exception, as recommended by the Planning Department in this case, is tantamount to denial, only the means are different. If and when the access in the area is improved by whatever means or agency, the applicant may reapply for a preliminary plat based-on the changed circumstances. At the same time, it, is not up to the Hearing Examiner to redesign this plat without a formal submission and outside of the hearing process. RECOMMENDATION: The City CoUncil should deny the preliminary plat of Eden Estates as premature and unprecedented. ORDERED THIS 28th day of December, 1979. • Fred J. a fman Land Use earing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of December, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Mark Hecock & Peter Tiersma, 24034-24th S. , Kent, WA 98031 Mich"ael Hanis, 405 S. 4th, 'Renton, WA 98055 Sharon Tischer, 2009 N.E. 28th St. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of December, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti • Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City`s Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before January 11, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error 'in 'judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the. Examiner's decision. ,This request shall set' forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with, the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting • other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. «se• 1'7" q„r. A _. • _ ..�"1.w''^T".'Y..:.._.._•a -a...J. ,.._. _.'__ _. w.._........_. .__......". _. �• •.eL- i.t. 65 . l• . ' 1�// 7 P! , I OZ. 1 I 1 t l --,,,.----.44--.---. : ,- 14.1- : , - .,• -_-.,•,/ • .1 __„_, ! ..7,.....__11.,....,,_,„.. . ,, . ,.. „. - ..,. , .... =I .� a .�.1.•..� 79 ' ''4 ifii:41...1. -.. - .g----;- -1 1 , li.. ' '11H. : '''' 5 , n1,� 27 1 z� II1 - -__ rC } 7I I .. a, I `, •'; ..I•r,._�,..� a y, ... . _ i i 1 I. � P'•-• ' 517E . T-: =fir I •0 , . Ijl L1, I i i ' ' r;.+iT Y,aYT•T -1T�� i •7 °I I- .• . .. .• ,•lo i �l 1 1- z I 74 I I , .':.. ._ . . _ t. �' L.-1..• �L T..=.-?H--e-.:1 s� t',IT-T • ;, _ 4 I+ `.6r •� -7, %� • `I --Jj4G j D'^ SE _ ' y. 't R.-4 ., G imp 6 G . ,•5 . . • • 1 •.,---.1. --.i--.—'Hii ,. ' 5 I'/ 74 • . ....2.1_,%QcQ - . ]j 1 !x ! , III "_ � ]4a •].• 571 1 I 1 . ,' I { I t tT Tb 1�.• —.r �.. ' .4,11-'{ t',' : .a...... -a._ ;• _ _ -c.,v _ . ._ i ..-- „ .+• .$ • III ' ' n.w - ..�. _ J�.S' 7 - �-.I ' , `1 ��Il,T1_ _ I. 11V C i ff IAj all (R '2 'I GS. f `�-' :;;:;I'ff9i l 1I11'1ila �:" t i 151)115 ;;� , I ,� 11T'1 11. 1-, h• �VI!, I. - �t /N FtG C Ate ' ' - '1 1"-+, 11-1-r. t , 11 • ., t '-'1, ,,,... ..":'1 t , *I _. T ® • 562 S -� `L4 .., . { ITtI .,.' _In.iLI.1 '•:j'I} ,,, I+ i o` �'it-t p: II; YLi: �,Tl:- „-..,w - ----T_r.7-._ zal MU zs9 xls9 se czl z zos ltl: t S; ., 'r .. . i �N AI�~ zpo r 1_ �I } �ra [.iTY 1T- \ ',' G.+6f ••lZi l+ 4 • _ V57� zao z> Ea tr1 �a r . ',. ..\ •}mot\ t a { ..,1 .... .�� .I .0' ,.74A Z.tl I 2)e L2j •',l ^--L.Y- 7:• i-C7 ti k N.., .:,k...„,-" ,, „. , .,___ ; ,.. . , ..._ ,.._,0. : i„.:.:. • , i ,,..4.,„_....-. .------. - ,,,,:,,.....,..,. ,_.:,,..,_:::,,A2...„;.:,..t „ , .. , • ,, C7� liT:i\ , „ .'M YID I ON! !,�''•W ` I\ . •I „I ...-._. ,? , Ci , oc CS.i', Ii -1-42 2 i i :2.4 rl 'Z 11 "I,,, \IT ,,, 1! ,o { -�S ZPJ °•z. _•. [ 45.r4 , \ ., \ . .\ „e i y pri"I ' 3 g + I I z,3 ? ,'• T . ,,.. ti?' \ . r -.:1.' _ _ :¢ .Q«Te:a-n.rw �'Sw... ...U=1i I MARK HEA000K & PETER TIERSMA ' li PP-430-79 (EDEN ESTATES) tI 1 . 1 FE, 5.9 .- .nay .m....gy..w......11r,..--.61.YM.--,, .,..„,r•nCfC,. .:..,O::n.r..•L•.a.,a.T'.'Of..m.,:i.r,,....I.,. Arra,H,'.,.0 t4L4.1,"sr•I:'is.1.sx=-r r 9tx.-"•T.9.r,r-•r.':"u-.3,14'J� APPLI CAt' i ',lark Hcacock and PeterTiersma Teel Al. ,�F;{.A +2 . 9 ac�•c:, I. P!'.1 NC I I';AL Via NE 28th Street ACCESS -. FX1 S'1ING 7(')NlNG G-7200 EXISTING USE Undeveloped S-lot single family ,',ubdivision COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN S I.n„le 11'am i .1 y Res i dent-i al Greenbelt ' COMMENTS 1 - --... . .__._. --- .... ...- - .. . .. ...... I - .... _ .ar- a..7- - :...... .... - ....., a.Z""y•—...-----. - To Sdh-.. saiv.tie 29.5 e .. ..1 A . 1. Ai i Eg72' S'7"it k644/.14X,ICIC A.a , ,..— fr-2.•,..,,.. :Mg/4 :air't teot \ 75 b....ir is n c A:61ff . - -- , . . . - , . . . --'''""'"••••• larallinallellal ... ?..16)'.-C44/ -5-otAio A.--.6-,- ,.1 3 . . ._ _ -• - - -• -- •-•TA:TA/6yr% •- ,, - ---- • - - 1 - • -------. .. _. __. .- .- , - ---- I 1 I • 'I \I . , 4 :.t,..-- I I \ • • \I--- -• J. •.. ,- I I 1 ._ • I 1/ , , - t'Om . •,, . ., ..., -_,40.--. •,:1,'. 1 i . I / -- 1 CO „. ' I• I I zi • . i / I I, I ' . .---- -- "" ' ----ii - It zz•‘4 i • , , ..''. 4. •, t • ,.,„. I 1 .--- I I ------- .• '., . . si . _ . in., -- 11; ---- ,.., • ,.,.• ' ,4 , --• i l ' ' ' °- ,. . • . .-,•. . • t 4 4, ., . ; ,,... ' . , .•, ,. t-,4,01 . .:.,,; • ' VI tit . k c ..,, ...:.,,,.„,:•,. ...._,. . ,. ...• . -,Y... , t . o --- . 1 i , ,‘) o ,,... ....,. .›... . ‘• •-, • ‘3., 1 1 • \.1.• , 14' , • • :.‘) .4 •-1 \ I ‘ 1 . , . _ ... ..• CI) co .._ _ __ _... . .._\ , i , CI 4s,,,r1 NII . _ .,, - .., . z , - 4 ...I %me 270 • N.) I 0 ;:. . , • ....--. .. Ze ' ./...... ..,..--„,_,..... , 1 0. ,.••••....-... Z.,-...---_-_-_- LI.-..--____J. 1._ _ . _..... __. _.. _ _ _ __ _ __ __ ___ :L•4/ .P5-. r•I l' ti ' sr,/ __ e4 • .,-• . J2d* .. I _.. -•• I '---. I Z.; t 1 • , I ii - .. ... ' . 4 / .. ... .. . ....... ..1 . ... . ... . . . , .. . RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM DF0181979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 7,819,10,11012,1 12,3I 4,5P6 PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 6 , 1979 APPLICANT: MARK HEACOCK AND PETER TIERSMA FILE NUMBER: PP-430-79 (EDEN ESTATE EXHIBIT NO. A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: ITEM Elvl l�l O ��" �9 The applicant requests preliminary plat approval of an 8-lot single family subdivision . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA 2. Applicant : MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA 3. Location : On NE 28th Street between Kennewick Place NE and Aberdeen Avenue NE • 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5. Size of Property : ±2. 9 acres 6. Access : Via NE 28th Street 7. Existing Zoning: G-7200, Residence Single Family; minimum lot size 7200 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-7200 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential , Greenbelt 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on October 26 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on October 26 , 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1835 of August 23, 1960. It was rezoned from P-1 to G-7200 on May 20, 1974 by Ordinance #2852. A six-lot subdivision was approved on the site in May of 1976, File Number PP-838-75 by the Renton City Council. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site rises from west to east at slopes ranging from 12-16%. 2. Soils : Alderwood and Kitsap soils , very steep (AkF) . Slopes are very steep. Drainage and permeability vary. Runoff is rapid to very rapid, and the erosion hazard is severe to very severe. The slippage potential is severe . These soils ' PLANNING DEPARTME] PRELIMINARY REPORT .1.0 THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING; MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA, File No PP-430-79 NOVEMBER 67 1979 (EDEN ESTATES) PAGE TWO are used for timber. Indianola Loamy Fine Sand (InC) . This soil has rapid permeability, available water capacity is moderate, runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and for urban development . 3. Vegetation : The subject site is heavily wooded with numerous evergreens and some deciduous intermixed. 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water : No water was observed on the subject site although the drainage basin of Honey Creek is located along the northerly portion (October 26 , 1979) . 6. Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped with scattered single family homes located to the south, east and west . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are principally single family residential in nature. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: An 8" water main extends east-west on NE 27th Street within 200 feet to the south of the subject site and a 12" main runs north-south on Kennewick Place NE approxi- mately 200' to the west . A 12" sanitary sewer is also located on NE 28th Street . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Routes #142 and 144 operate along NE 27th Street . 4 . Schools : Kennydale Elementary School is within 4 mile to the west of the subject site while McKnight Junior High School is approximately one mile to the south and Hazen Senior High School is within 3 miles to the east . 5. Recreation : Kennydale Lions Park is located approximately mile to the southeast and the North Highlands Park one mile to the southeast . G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729; "G" , General Classification District . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1106; Preliminary Plat Requirements. 2. Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report , 1965, Objective 6 , page 18 and Residential , page 11 . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: . 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will remove the vegetation , disturb the soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures , however, these impacts can be mitigated. PLANNING DEPARTME: PRELIMINARY REPORT TO. THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA, File No PP-430-79 NOVEMBER 6 , 1979 (EDEN ESTATES) PAGE THREE 2. Population/Employment : The proposed plat of 8 lots will increase the area population by approximately 28 persons (3. 5 persons/home times 8 homes) . 3. Schools : The proposed subdivision will increase the school population by approximately 45 students ( . 5 student/home times 8 homes) . These new pupils will likely be scattered throughout the grades and not significantly impact the existing services. 4. Social : Development of the subject site will result in increased opportunities for social interaction among the area residents. 5. Traffic : The new plat will increase traffic in the area by approximately 80 trips per day (10 trips/unit times 8 new units) . J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental. Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division (no response received) . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division (no response received) . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division (no response received) . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division (no response received) . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . (copy attached) 6. City of Renton Police Department . (copy attached) L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of single family residential use for the site and surrounding area. 2. In 1975 and 1976 a residential subdivision of 10 lots was reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council . The final approval placed 5 conditions on the preliminary plat and reduced the number of lots to 6. The situation has not been modified substantially since that time . 3. Access to the site was the principal point of concern expressed in the original review. Section 9-1108(23)A(5) states that residential access street rights-of-way shall not be less than 50 feet wide. The present access to the subdivision is supplied by an existing 25' right-of-way, which extends from Aberdeen Avenue NE to Kennewick Place NE , along the south boundary of the subject property. 4. The applicant has not submitted a request for an exception to this requirement . 5 . The access question is complicated by the fact that Aberdeen Avenue NE is not improved and is actually a cul-de-sac, with this development further extending the cul-de-sac to 1020 feet , in conflict with 9-1108-23A which specifies an 800 foot maximum length. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : The public hearing cannot be completed without the exception being heard for both access width and cul-de-sac length. Therefore, it is recommended that the public hearing be continued until December 4, 1979 to allow the applicant time to submit the appropriate exception, requests. ,e t.. 7r yi 14,"".aQ TM " _• "mom' I a ---.—_ // Y . -69 107 rn— II j •. IIBIa ST m y i� —i a Art � 2 I y a .;iIx V l I as .• _ 11:11213�I _71z .. ' ..._. I 100 ' `—S - ...• . ':, ,an 7 ✓( Q 80 ' •fa �1=1 90 J xx— ,-- lai C 4- je — --_ _I -- _-- __-__.1=. it I 7II �93 ;'T' ( % 1 •.Yo 1 e Qr� 6 r v.. -� ' 5 ilia! I • I I x I,•1, +p 4. i Ali r nixJ•L,,,, _ g I 1 ,w. s • .. 1.{ " I -----1 ---� S E I 1'1•I•�,i•lrle e1ein � 51 ° wim 22 2+ 7 69 70 71 • 1 IL, ,,.1, 1I '� (e9 })- 1 I°1"1 -�. I oz. �__ ._ DE 07" St_ T Z I • 7 I f , 1 Ix _/'°I'J (( • 11 it —�,-. ___._� !66 366 S 52 SE ST 1 4• 1 :.• 11I y z i2•9•, ' 74.: ..1 .•,,,} '. �? 373 + • � , . J t`} I Ea ® � ,• I 1 / 40 T, l,l�ol �LLJ riI It-1 9j 52 a , 1 • + !/4 III I f:111 .iilll+ ' Ill 6z ,, I 1 �' 77 7, 564 ,j 3671 371 1 1 r i 1T �I�Illr" ,. _.._ i I ° yl ti'1l .T I 1 a 37 1' bl I llll '1I In — 1 . ,...„, ; „ ' 'DTI I wl 1 l I . 11 WIC.0�^ 1 —1 �1 18-4 y Y.•,..,, e ,r;, p '1 11 1111111111 11 ■ l►i ;Cc r x I , ?, © • ` �" S4 �� — i — — •_ --y, a,�nw•.i rtyi I irI I =`�,�T� i(t:r. +�Y PAGIFI 'I( _tilooy- pP.FIG COAST 5: '' ' 1 Romp UI 111 MIN , e.Y la I t, P4 �'111 IA 1 1 1 :IIS 1• 50 p r4W • � 53 _ __ , —I -.. 1 \ ;R•, j • � � •1 ..— I I- _--_ IJi � 20I I iK,O I 2S9 1 299 2�9 L � 2I20-1 •-C REN;ON —C i ff M, '- . 1 1 '`L-1 © . � \ f11C). � `l� ee z1„ 1 —_ _ 277 I 2!7 - f • rt •S% ;\`f ,,, ,.,,. .. ."" a + •a5_—_ 27G L. (�2,7�- 240 2l71 222 2�9 2C4 I 7 IF i\ ;';1•:-4 '' tiOr ',„9tN as QI, I „ _ 275 1�1`75 — —_ -1 I\ —� zwir. '�, e, y za x. 0,, 295 282 2/4 71�1 I 254 241 296 223 l " xs*y Jt• � 314 aT =� - ", F—' I 1 x 1 R s .,. „1 I� r- I i i,. ,'1 { �S L-- -.-- ST -- Li' N.'+4TM ST, i -— _ - NT6.-_T_.3T_ -------. >r.' x elw•„ : 1, :, :I . I i I I1 :_ __ Q i3. 1 S ._-J r_- -_1 ;, ONE 2340ST I •11, 1 1 \ a7�»e 75-4-H 283 ;..273 • 24,2_'_253' 242 235 2241•. , :1 .\\' \ 338 N. I, k) '. 1--t'! ,'.:.:., •f - :'.t•: 1 4 1 1 �,' .719 - I, 0 i t ;.. Y f�:7 7 '. ^;��'ri�^_ •jl -~;L1st'RA?-- l tI k \q '' .... I 293 2p,4 ' 272 263_ F52� 243 2�34 225.-a L -i , ' , ..I Ry 3r0s J _,0 -l 1 y I 1i 1 1 11 I II MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA PP-430-79 (EDEN ESTATES) 1 f ,"—, ' 1 APPLICANT Mark Heacock and Peter Tiersma TOTAL AREA +2. 9 acres i 1 1 PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via NE 28th Street E IZONINGG-7200 1 X STING EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE 8-lot single family subdivision COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential ; Greenbelt COMMENTS I I 1 1 f - - i I r Renton Planning Departmen . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application:. 4 E v demAY eifirt' , 3m A 6,..„4.„. il.e,A we.s i'QG-., . Location : op Re'_ t&A ', e.6 l.QvfA lit e tine( es z iP. 'E t : ' eviecp fig'ivr Applicant :40 COC �I(1 °� t' [c�LPL°' firi�'r - l� TO : P rks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ::._j '6/7k! Police Department A, R, C, MEETING,_ ® j4 Public Works Department ; Engineering Division Traffic Engineering ____Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department Cr�14'��IT�PdGP�F���G1�ET��VLIC�rIOUI}�FV��l1SCONF�IF�i�IOr SHOULD 3 HELDIN ON �� CONFERENCE ��;,,, � AT tl:�)�) Art I N THE THIRD I (Z1l F(_00}� F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WALL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT N THE ARC, PLI,ASE PROVI DE THE COMMENTS TO THE ILANN I NG DEPARTMENT BY 5: UO PM ON ,,6ec.2,7d 75 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ire TI r - L:)._e_, X--- Approved _Approved with conditions ' _I Not Approved / /' I' , -(1---- y; _-, ------- ,, .2. ,,,L,../-54—,------- Si gr-atur o Director _—F-- -- -- - Representative- - or /luthor i:tad /erY_) ..--; C - 7/ ate REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : _` —Approved __ —Appr"oved withconditions —Not Approved 1 gnature of p i rector or Authorized Representative Date Anton Planning Department ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : (P " f *® ) log• -57,40,94' Location : + tmAettjeti , p cif,. deee tot Applicant : AreCiCk �r 6 � re ter4$ .fi c�'�eoo- r- _ TO : l Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: l/NNW Police Department A. R. C. MEETING °, / 1? • Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department MM T DD fpll 77 pp LL �NrI MIORF(SI GT ETARIC TMIREVI EISCONFEf ATTIO� SHOU D P OVIDFD NCE (ARC) TO 3E HELD Off ���/ ��� AT 9.00 00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE RU 1 „ IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE W LL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT NU,THE AR ARCS ASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE ILANNING DEPARTMENTBY I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: — Approved Approved with conditions. Not Approved � I Sign.lture of Direcor or Authorized Representative / / Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AM ��-�'� � 1979 PLANNING DEPARTMENT �'i8r9,lO,)),12�1i2i3,�,,�PM SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ! PUBLIC HEARING uu DECEMBER 18, 1979EX JBIT 1 O. ITEM NO. APPLICANT: MARK HEACOCK AND PETER TIERSMA FILE NUMBERS : PP-430-79 (Eden Estates) E-449-79 (Access Width) E-450-79 (Cul-de-sac) A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant request preliminary plat approval of an 8-lot single family subdivision and two exceptions to the subdivision ordinance. The first exception request is from the 50-foot width of residential access street rights-of-way, Section 9-1108. 23A(5) . The applicant proposes use of the existing 25-foot wide public right-of-way. The second exception is for the length of the cul-de-sac (Section 9-1108-23A(7) ) which physically extends from the intersection of Aberdeen Avenue NE and NE 27th Street a distance of approximately 1020 feet . B, AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division (copy attached) . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division (copy attached) . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division (no response received) . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division (no response received) . 5. City of Renton Fire Department (copy attached) . 6. City of Renton Police Department (copy attached) . C. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1. The, subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of single family residential use for the site and surrounding area. 2. In 1975 and 1976 a residential subdivision of 10 lots was reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council . The final approval placed 5 conditions on the preliminary plat and reduced the number of lots to 6 (copy attached) . The situation has not been modified substantially since that time. EXCEPTION 1 : 3. Access to the site was the principal point of concern expressed in the original review. Section 9.-1108(23)A(5) states that residential access street rights-of-way shall not be less than 50 feet wide. The present access to the subdivision is supplied by an existing 25 ' right-of-way , which extends from Aberdeen Avenue NE to Kennewick Place NE, along the south boundary of the subject property. The responses received from other departments vary from those received in 1975. At that time, the Fire and Public Works Departments specifically required that the development be limited to 6 single family residential lots. The Public Works Department recommends approval of the request for exception with the construction of a 22-foot wide street from Aberdeen Avenue NE to the subdivision site . In addition the right-of-way for NE 28th Street should only be increased to 30 feet in width adjacent to the subdivision . The Fire Department has stated that if the roadway is less than 30 feet in width, that it shall be marked exclusively for fire lanes. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MARK HEACOCK AND PETER TIERSMA, File Nos : PP-430-79 DECEMBER 18, 1979 E-449-79 E-450-79 The construction of a 22-foot wide street does not address pedestrian access. In 1975 , the Planning Department recommended that the minimum right-of-way should be 35 feet. It would appear that granting of the exception would be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity. (Section 9--1109(1) (C) . Even though the exception may appear to be necessary to insure such property the rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under similar circumstances(Section 9-1109(1) (A) , those rights are potential until adequate public services can be provided. Applying the domino theory to land use planning, the development of a parcel is dependent upon the development of the preceding parcel. However, economics short circuits this system if the developer is willing to pay the costs getting around the other pa:cel . The hardship may be one of economics which should not be considered as justification for an exception. EXCEPTION 2 : 4. The proposed cul-de-sac is only 200 feet within the boundaries of the proposed preliminary plat . However, the end of the physical cul-de-sac that extends from the intersection of Aberdeen Avenue NE and NE 27th Street is approximately 1020 feet . This is in conflict with Section 9-1108-23A(7) of the Renton Municipal Code which specifies an 800 foot maximum length. The Public Works Department has commented that an exception is not necessary in this case since NE 28th Street is a through street. It is a substandard dead end street . Using this interpretation it would appear that one cul-de-sac of legal length could be added onto another one of legal length without end. In fact , a cul-de-sac of this length (approximately 1 ,000 feet) would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity, Section 9-.1109(1)C if an adequate turn around for emergency vehicles was provided and the street was constructed to normal street standards . Aberdeen Avenue NE north of NE 27th Street is substandard and not fully improved. Normal development patterns in the area have used both dead end and permanent and temporary cul-de--sacs to provide access as outlying parcels were developed. Allowing the exception would only grant the property owner privileges that other adjacent properties had already enjoyed, Section 9-1109(1)B. In addition , the property could not obtain access in any other manner that would not require this exception to cul-de-sac length. 'The property to the north of the subject parcel is owned by King County Parks Department . The property cannot be purchased nor an easement obtained through the parcel because of federal funds used in the purchase of the park. This is a special physical circumstance which would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of his property (Section 9-1109(1)A) . D. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above analysis , it is recommended that the preliminary plat of Eden Estates , File Number PP-430-79, and Exceptions E-450-79 E-449-79 be approved subject to the following conditions : 1. Construction of NE 28th Street to a standard width to include . sidewalks from Aberdeen Avenue NE west . 2. The improvement of Aberdeen Ave . NE north from the intersection of Aberdeen Avenue NE and NE 27th Street. 3. The cul-de-sac shall be a minimum of 45 feet in radius with an additional 12 feet of easement for sidewalks and landscaping. • .,entton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT 14PPLIC/ITION REVIEW SHEET A p p 1 i : KIF4°V ITl r � g �, cation Yf�_� �.. ���'-�-- `���I ) gilo zA. ��',�494., � p f� e ,.; �.q'�! , t,._a__4 eA „",, _ __ -- -_ r __ — Location `�a cRez 6 4c, r. �� .\e?tol ,Log.ek E' c`nih Lf!/ Applicant : 4.4eco,e1A Mack. '- - - . u G� `�s= �/� '' ``�ram' — --- ti - TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :,- //6/ i Police Department A, R. C. MEETING / / /7r __ Publicjrks Department C //Engineering Division �0cmr0 Traffic Engineering i,,•-. J -- . ( U 1.91` ` _E3uilding Division ‘aCd \ Ili Utilities Engineering ,off f ' \• A/ .9` i'' Fire Department `J�NG .� (; f1���`I��rY�PF���U-IE�T��;I'LICII IO�dI���VI��IJSCO�F[�fIE J�I�1f SHUL'I.rD 3E� PP�VIDED IN :� �, E (ARC) 1 () HE HELD ON �� * _b�_ _ Al D:()() Am IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE TTJIJ f= YOUR DEPARTMEN 7DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE 1J •LL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLF,ASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: OG PM ON 4 c _ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved. A Approved with conditions ____Not Approved ) 2-J-j .�—�-- 6,7° c, q' am° z) 3 Jrc 4,cid, � .n5" �.% � /Sow �; d 18 r ,�,�e� , 3) Pa ,r-e- _L-�✓- i le S7 y-,P d� S t t� 7a Ala-rof e e ap t/2, --,...... "---1.1 i) 4RepresenSignature of Director or Authorized- at ' ve Date REVIEWING DEPARTE'9ENT/DIVISI ._ � -;-�- ___ 7TTT ApprovedJ A pprovc d with conditions ons Not pproved C/i( /ti i r h c711' I' 7-t-ei, u I r .:c 1 4coC:'61 , //' . C. C l 5 z C.)C ; 1. d C / 7, 1 /J (f<< �� IL'c 0/k l�- 0 1 y i `'`''.- -� _�_ 7.�.�e. -, �( -`' '(i a't''7 =` -1' C) 9 1. i 1. ' r - 1_ J CLr E_ J 6� 1 J l � CY -? i �j �. �•�� i-'C .�-��, �f_ `y 1--•Jc�_ i..,-) Signature or • Director or Authorized uthoized Representative - /9/l? -.-ate REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIor • - - - - /�;; `;\ . enton Planning Department ' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE T , Application : e pew- 93'0- 7 r- cvf-ede, ,c am L o c a t ion : A/15 'dam / � �� � 4..wegf,a.0/44 eyiti e„, eke4 Applicant : Ark. /kcoc/ <, (/�-ier7 evvmac r� - TO :.. . Parks Department • SCHEDULED HEARING DATE,:,/mil/�'/1/ Police Department A. R. C. MEETING A?/'/7? . ` Public Works Department Engreering Division or- iAraffic Engineering - Building Division `�' �� / ,. , ,, I'',, ;' \ ` il Utilities Engineering } ''' Fire Department ' % `, 'I IN IFNT I dO RF(S.1 GEST I ONS I REGARDIGTHIS CONFERENCE. I CAT arJ SHOULD B� PROVIDED REVIEW CONFERENCE. (ARC) TO ].3_ H_.LD ON 6 — • AT 0 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE r, OUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE W LL NOT BE ABLE TO nN ATTD THE ARC, PL ASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 PM ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: XApproved Approved with conditions Not Approved //' r ��L air ' . - f'on 1 411;Q/ cpAii/l� �� , -,.-7,. / / ///y/.?-7, - ,, : ' , . 1____ /1i Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date -3 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :- C .l)4--,____-___ -� X _ApprovedApproved with conditions _ Not Approved • q)• /// _— /C' - ? > - i r S i gnatu�c bf Directoror A ithori zed Representati ve� Date /03/77 Renton Planning Department` DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEt/ SIZE Application :4°E,6/4 e/9(E-3/yei7-7 r vs-0— le,e4riA Location : f�l . '��'� .G?i�. A ' (2-,5 Applicant : r-to illeCoct TO : Parks ne artment p SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : /mil/g/i Police Department A, R, C, MEETING_ /77 ' Public Works Department Engineering Division Tr fic Engineering 401 Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department oft N_ S OR, SUG(IST ONS RUMP rIIS A 'PrICATIOCJ SHOULD JJ3 ; PROVIDFD IN �IR TANG FOIE 1 - E J\P�'LI(;Al IOV IU VTt-_W CUIdf=�_R1 NCL. (A1ZC) _ 0 13 ON —,�--,� _ Al 9 °00 AN IN THE THIRD OCONFERENCE U ! i, I F YOUR DEPARTMEN'iD I VI S I ON REPRESENTATIVE FLOOR. I� T ATT �,N THE ARC, PROVIDEI E WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PL.-ASE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5: UO P°i ON of, 77 —® REVIEWING ,DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved c.4, - 'a:_.- `;J1 C i 5j -(,' / (_) L,.'3k -t- " o J ivu��G. � C ; 'i� j LJi", `qs- A� .P4. i c A A.: C A-I(, ( /C1 . c:l c4F_ -s (c i Ilia-11/, "4 4,i/j Signature or Di. or or Authori ze(1 Representative / Date REVILI•JING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :_--Z' A Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved w Si )&),,, gnature of Director or Authorized RepZese rtaati ve Date r• „'. . ----- / 3/77 Renton i' I ,;nnilicl Dep,it• tinei� ►. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 1i n p I i c a L i on :A ['!<</--1 f, Er ( ..r3— 7_`l..__Co r. _c- 1 __' •�•.t,._ •.. .:A .. . ,•. i1t lac" i i)l l ____ f Izs ,k.t'_e 2 • <l?;7'.4 ` ri�-�''/_aLe4•: ) 4Qsore'k (• 1 r�71 4 Abe Applic.:1 i is. :_...d),,,,c IL lik c o c 1-: 5.! TO :__ .- .Turks Department SCIIE111U1 ED HEARING DATE: / //ff f 7ci • Police Department A, R, C. f![kl•IPdG_.A— //7`' . Public Works Department . Engineering Division • Trai i is Engineering • --Building Division -.:,1,` Utilit•ies Engineering 1,/ ire Department ( f M !! ( , 4 if- H I l► J:�, ICI (,11I D I •ii� THIS I 41) .101.11M SIIOLI 1) -W f ROVIIlFI) IN lik i I l ,,i I III; III!-. 11\F�'L-1 CA I ION I�I•.\l1( 11 C(.1NI f�l N(,1-. . ARC) 10 ;E: HELD O ! : _ Al �.► :I)I) AN IN ! HE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE 1,,,e ;':,�_... 1 ':._ 1'��li!( DI"I'A1;•i MI NY/U I V I ION Itkl'R[SEN I A 1 VE WALL NOT ill ABLE TO A•lii•Ni' .illl•: ARC., I'i I_/�SE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE I( LANNING DEPARTMENT l3', '_,: u:l I'N i;I.. - jam?1 •:*/1`j�.� PI- Uli ilikC, L[PARIP•IENi/DIVISION : .. -*• -,\i,i,VL)veLI 1el___ ilpprovcd Frith conditions Not Approved 1451 RAottv0 IrL.1IAtred crow C e 1,.-/e r. CAI" oe• s-Ac. . 'S/b .L Af� 01s A fat IJiVf cimor !f I5Ss 7 . A ',' - ( (%rk.. L ff:7---.. j 1&/i /2-7 S i ;!n ioc,. i)i Dii'eci.or or /1u,1 orized• Representative • bate hi. V I , I ,:c, DI I'i\RIMENT/UIVISTI►il : _ . -.. _._ _ —._. • j :,,Jp. ov d _Approved with conditions Not Approved r / ®i 11.4A. Av ai 0 THE CITY OF RENTON Cs W%/ bi4-- 9 7. .9.i.,,...;; ....,.,�� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 Z l�li. 8 O� ,,, y CHARLES J. DELAURENTI D MAYOR 0 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT �O 4e' 235-2550 •P4TFOSEP. - April 23 , 1976 The Honorable C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor • City Council Members Renton , Washington • . /4 ti7 RE : PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ' ( Kennydale Firs i y Gordon A . Irish-j; App] s . f h /7e c. PP-838-75 and E-839-75 ; Applications for ,�' `;vc�li P v- Preliminary Plat Approval and Exception to Subdivision Ordinance ; property located on =• �� � , J � � N . E . 28th St . between Jones Ave . N . E . and it �� ! Aberdeen Ave . N . E . if Dear Council Members : The Planning Commission completed its review of the Kennydale Firs preliminary plat and request for exception to the Subdi - vision Ordinance at its April 14 , 1976 , meeting . The plat has the , following characteristics : , otal Area -- 12 . 92 acres Principal Access -- N . E . 28th St . Existing Zone -- G-7200 Existing Use -- undeveloped wooded area Proposed Use -- single family residential subdivision Comprehensive Plan -- South one-half is single family residential ; north one-half is greenbelt . After considerable study and deliberation , the Planning Com- mission recommended to the City Council -approval of the Kenny- • dale Firs preliminary plat of six lots and the granting of an exception to the required 50 foot access road subject to the following conditions : 1 . The provision of a 22 foot wide blacktopped access on the existing 25 foot right-of-way ( N . E . 28th St . ) to the subject site . Adequate . storm drainage shall be provided . Final street improvements shall be subject to Public Works Department approval . 2 . That portion of N . E . 28th St. along the appli - cant ' s property shall be a minimum of 50 feet . in width with adequate turnaround space pro- vided . Improvements and storm drainage shall be required subject to final approval of the Public Works Department . €1 " 'FXTSTTAU. HCF unnavrw , r,ncr•n wnnr,Nil nrrn , . .._...._� The Honorable C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor City Council Members April 23 , 1976 Page Two 3 . Within the plat itself a 50 foot right-of-way shall be provided with adequate width and turn- around capabilities for fire and emergency vehicle purposes and adequate traffic circula- tion . Storm drainage and improvements shall be required . All utilities and improvements shall be subject to final approval by the Public Works Department . 4. The existing trees and natural character of the site shall be maintained as much as possible . 5 . Vacate N . E . 28th St . west of the turnaround with provision for utility easements , if requested by applicant and adjacent property owners . In recommending to grant the exception to the Subdivision Ordinance , it was the Commission ' s finding that special circumstances do exist affecting the property in question and that the granting of the exception would not be detri - mental to the adjacent and surrounding properties . The proposed development is in conformance with the city ' s Subdivision Ordinance and is in agreement with the city ' s Comprehensive Plan. Very truly Yours , ,Gordon Ericksen /'Planni Director GYE :wr I / Attachment cc : City Attorney . City Clerk • Ren"won City Council , 5/24/76 - Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING (Continued) Comprehensive Land it being far sighted and. long range, tremendous use of the river, it will be Plan Change for used to its utmost and will contribute to the well being and happiness Cedar River Trail of the citizens of Renton. Mr. Bob Karinen, 1205 Shelton Ave. S.E. , System and Master said it appears there will be more people along the river, believe the Plan residents will have to go along with the plan, but they should be given a lot of consideration as to closeness of the trail to their residences and prime consideration should be given to those property owners as to their right of privacy. Mayor Delaurenti assured the property owners that the trails would be located further away from their properties so as to assure privacy. Upon query from Councilman Stredicke about the - use of motorcycles on the trails , Mr. Ericksen said the trail should be for pedestrians, for hiking, fishing and things of that nature and development next to our park sites. Further discussion followed. Mr. Ericksen said the Planning Commission recommended approval of the • Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the Cedar River. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THAT THE HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, TO ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ON THE CEDAR RIVER TRAIL SYSTEM AND REFER TO THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE FOR PROPER ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Seymour commented that the intent of this proposal was to preserve the Cedar River as it is a vital part of our resources in this community and anyone interested in following the progress of this plan is welcome to attend the Community Services Committee meetings and offer input, also, Mr. Ericksen would be happy to do the same in the Planning Commission. Councilman Stredicke said he had received complaints from citizens that indicated the river • bank had been closed to pedestrian access north of the Logan Street Bridge bya fence orsign that people would not be allowed on the river bank. Mr. Ericksen said he was not aware of any signing. Councilman Stredicke announced that on July 4, 1976, a raft race sponsored by the Jaycees, from the county park area down to the lake and an innertube race for kids of all ages from the railroad bridge down past the library would be held. PUBLIC HEARING ,This being the date set and proper notices having been published, posted Kennydale Firs ; and mailed as required by law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hear- Preliminary Plat ing to consider application for Preliminary Plat approval and exception to the Subdivision Ordinance, for property located on N.E. 28th St. , between Jones Ave. N.E. and Aberdeen Ave. N. E. , to consist of six (6) lots, known as Kennydale Firs. Planning Director Ericksen displayed charts showing a ten-lot plat, and the six-lot plat proposal that was recommended by the Planning Commission with an exception to the required 50 foot access road. The 10-lot plat was requested by the developer, 4-lot and 8-lot plats had also been considered. Recommendation of the Planning Commission was to keep the development at a low density as the access road was not adequate, also in order to preserve the trees on tie site; the lot sizes vary from about 18,000 square feet to 20,000 square feet. Slides were shown of the area showing other homes in the vicinity, the access roads and areas for future development. Mayor Delaurenti invited audience comment. Mr. E. L. Munson, 809 Monroe Ave. N.E, , developer for the owner, Gordon Irish, said the development would not be feasible with only six lots, it could be done with eight lots with the same requirements. Upon inquiry by Councilman McBeth as to why the Planning Commission after being petitioned for a 10-lot develop- ment, recommended a 6-lot instead of an 8-lot development, Mr. Ericksen replied the limitation of access, the nature of the existing residential development, and specified certain improvements to be installed. The applicant was requesting an exception from the Subdivision Ordinance land standards. Councilman Clymer said the cost effectiveness of these l! lots would prohibit development of this plat at this time with six lots ! and the lots of such large size and inquired what price houses would have to be built on this plat. Mr. Ericksen replied the general price ! of houses in that area were now $35,000 to $40,000 on up to $60,000 or 170,000, the character of the site lends itself to custom built homes as lots are 18,000 to 20,000 square feet. Upon inquiry from Councilman Bruce, Mr. Munson replied the houses he was planning would cost from $58,000 to $60,000. Further discussion ensued regarding the possibility of the city participating partially in the cost of paving the access road; the impact of higher density building in the area; preservation of the existing woods and green belt and impact on neighboring homes; and the possibility of vacation of a portion of N. E. 28th St. MOVED BY { g$$ ity Council '1 /76 - Page 3 ' 'BLIC HEARING (Continued) Kennydale Firs STREDICKE, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. Preliminary Plat *MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, THAT COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION WITH THE FIVE STIPULATIONS AND ADD THE CITY PARTICIPATE IN IMPROVEMENTS ON N.E. 28TH ST. AND REFER TO THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE. Some discussion ensued as to whether the city could require a developer to improve a street that did not abut his property, City Attorney Shellan advising that legally you can' t require anyone to develop a street not adjacent to his property. Inquiries were ' made to Public Works Director Gonnason on the probable cost of such improvement, being advised it would probably cost around $12,000. *MOTION CARRIED. Ps.olution 2041 Legislation Committee Chairman Clymer' presented resolution commending 6u. ernment Class students , Lisa Burgener, Julie Carlson and Jan Gilbert, all students ,.ii;dberg High in Mr. Putnam Little' s U.S. Government class at Lindbergh High School , School for appearing before the City Council 's Legislation Committee and/ dis- playing great wisdom and knowledge involving all matters of government, national , state and local and further ordering Mr. Putnam Little to appear before the City Council 's Legislation Committee to undergo thorough questioning by said Committee as to his knowledge of govern- mental affairs to determine if .he possessed the same degree of expertise in these subject matters as his students. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, THE RESOLUTION BE READ AS PRESENTED BY THE LEGISLATION COMMITTEE. MOTION CARRIED. After reading, IT WAS MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, THE RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS READ. MOTION CARRIED. Council- man Clymer commented that Mr. Little had sent many of his students to the committee meetings and has done a fine job in teaching his students. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, TO PRESENT THE RESOLUTION IN PERSON TO THE STUDENTS PRESENT AT THE COUNCIL MEETING AND RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED. • :recess Council reconvened at 10: 10 p.m. with all Councilpersons present as previously reported. }rian D. Gain Mayor Delaurenti introduced Brian D. Gain, the new Public Defender Public Defender for the Renton Municipal Court. He noted that- Councilman McBeth 's wife, Kathy Mcbeth Kathy, was present and introduced her to the Council and audience. 3ruce McKay Former Councilman Bruce McKay was introduced also. They were greeted Introduced . with a round of applause. :'UBLIC HEARING 'his being the date set and proper notices having been published, posted aARKW00D HOMES and mailed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to consider pre- Preliminary Plat liminary plat approval for Parkwood Homes , a 100 lot major subdivision Rolling Hills located on the south side of Puget Drive S.E. , between .Benson Hill Apart- 'ko. 4) ments and Edmonds Ave. S.E. , north of S.E. 22nd St. Planning Director Fricksen explained the project and the Planning Commission recommenda- tion and the conditions of the recommendation; initial funding of home- owners association; open space and landscaping; one lot eliminated; trees and vegetation saved; a 15' easement along Puget Drive; wood fencing along 116th Ave. S. E. for screening; undergrounding of utilities; • temporary widening of Puget Drive by entrance; stOrm water drainage and walkways. Mayor Delaurenti invited audience comment. Mr. George Cook, 14410 -160th Pl , S. E. , Woodinville, representive for Parkwood Homes, said the developer had gone to great lengths in meeting the concerns of the elected representatives of the Rolling Hills Homeowners Association, gone through six consecutive designs at the request of the homeowners, revised the name to Parkwood Homes and elimination of access to Rolling Hills No. 3, however, it is impossible to please everyone. We have had the best redesign that is consistent with the safety of the future resi- dents of Parkwood. R. Kapur, 2016 Edmonds Drive S.E. , said he represented the home owners living in the neighborhood of the exit on S.E. 20th St. , which is only 100 feet long, this being used as a shortcut by Cascade and Fairwood and is already carrying a heavy load of traffic and was very dangerous to the residents , especially children, in the area and suggested alternate routes. R. E. Sharpe, 2001 Edmonds Drive S. E. , said he had no objection to the development, but the situation on 116th Ave. S. E. (Edmonds Ave. S. E. ) was critical . Dines H. Patel , 2004 Edmonds Drive S. E. , proposed that S. E. 20th St. be vacated and if the city was agreeable, he was willing to buy it for a playground for the area. Ruth Williams , 1918 Edmonds Ave. S. E. , said she agreed with the closure of S. E. 20th St. and that emergency vehicles always came in through • Puget Drive. Earl Mann, 2409 S. E. 19th St. , said he also felt strongly V:, :/FINAL DECLARATION OF arik ; ' 'FT INON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . PP-430-79 [' PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-482-79 ! FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Subdivision of 2.9 acres into eight single family residential lots. Proponent ; NARK HEACOCK Location of, Proposal N.E. 28th Street between Kennewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Avenue N.E. Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This has been determined to proposal 1• have AK not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS El is it is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2.) (c ) . This decision was ma•e afte,rreview by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance : 1. The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning for the subject site. 2. The proposal is not of a sufficient magnitude to impose adverse impacts, hick cannot be mitigated. Measures,1if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Of i a l DAVID R. CLEMENS Title r`Senior p% e , Date December 17, 1979 Signature 4(4P 7W42 City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ,.r LAW OFFICES OF Offices: AUBURN HARPOLD, HAMS, COMBS & ROM RENTON GEORGE FIORI,JR. MICHAEL M.HANIS Reply to: 405 SOUTH FOURTH DAVID L.HARPOLD LOREN D.COMBS RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 DAVID A.LITTLE TELEPHONE: (206) 228-1301 November 26 , 1979 • City of Renton RECEIVED Planning: Department CITY OF RENTON Renton City Hall HEARING EXAMINER Renton, WA 98055 DEC 31979 Re: PP-430-79 AM pm 7181911011b 12111213t4 s$16 Gentlemen: - On behalf. of Mark Heacock and Peter Tiersma, applicants on the above-referenced preliminary plat matter, an exception is hereby requested regarding access width and cul de sac length. It is requested that the proposed access width of 25 feet and the "cul de sac" length of 1020 feet be approved. This request is made pursuant to Ordinance 9-1109 , and is based upon the following circumstances : 1. There are special physical circumstances and conditions affecting the property. Strict application of the Ordinance would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use and development of their land. The area through which access must be made is almost a park and has been treated as such by present residents. The applicants wish to maintain the character of the area. If WWI they are required to develop to 50 ' wide with thru access, the B �l character of the area will be destroyed, and strong opposition '��1*) from present residents will result. ('W Because of the location and topography of this site, no further development can occur which would be served by this access. The County owns all the area behind. Therefore, full compliance is unnecessary, and would in fact be detrimental to the public interest. Adequate provision can be made for access by emergency vehicles. 2. This exception is necessary to insure this property the rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity. t The applicants wish to develop consistent with the area. Compliance with the Ordinance will be inconsistent with ' what is there, and harmful to the character of the area. - - 3.- The exception will not be_ injurious to other property. On the contrary, to require full compliance would be extremely injurious to neighboring properties , and would destroy the unique and highly desirable atmosphere of the area. November 26 , 19 Page 2 For the foregoing reasons, exception-from the- Ordi_nance_ __ - - is requested. Very truly yours, HARPOLD, NIS, OMBS & FIORI Michael M. Hanis MMH:ad - • J- • •'fit 4y 1 7! ' �A 6 e} µ� .g^ i*- 1 z GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF N . E. 28TH STREET BETWEEN KENNEWICK PLACE N . E . AND ABDERDEEN AVENUE N. E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A 1 EARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON DECEMBER 18, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 AM A.m. CONCERNING ITEM F/f REZONE SPECIAL SITE AP M IE A ' AGEMENT PERMIT A MARK HEACOCK AND PETER TIERSMA (EDEN ESTATES) APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO I UL-DE-SAC LENGTH, FILE NOS. E-449-79 AND E-450-79 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION OF I ,o THE CITY OF RENTON C.3 ® - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n 4 T. . CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR a PLANNING DEPARTMENT °9-0 <a• 235- 2550 O,9"' o SEPSE�O�P December 5 , 1979 Mr . Mark Heacock 32468 22nd Avenue S . W . Federal Way , Washington 98003 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING ACCESS WIDTH AND CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH , Files E-449-79 , E-450-79 ; property located on the north side of N . E . 28th St . between Kennewick Pl . N . E . and Aberdeen Ave . N . E . ( Eden Estates ) Dear Mr . Heacock : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 27 , 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for December 18 , 1979 at 9 : 00 am . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director 4-----R .----arw t By : e,.4 •y Roger' J 1 B aylocIK7 / ssoci at Planner cc : Peter Tiersma , 24034 - 24th South Kent , Washington 98031 Kenneth Oyler , P . O . Box 2258 Renton , Washington 98055 Michael Hanis , 405 South 4th Renton , Washington 98055 yr , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON) WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON DECEMBER 18 , 1979 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE , File SP-402-79 ; property located immediately east of Lake Washington Blvd . N . E. between S . E . 76th St . and S . E . 80th St . 2. MARK HEACOCK AND PETER TIERSMA ( EDEN ESTATES) , APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING ACCESS WIDTH AND CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH , Files E-449-79 and E-450-79 ; property located on the north side of N . E . 28th St . between Kennewick Pl . .N . E . and Aberdeen Ave. N . E . 3 . DONALD J . ROHRSSEN , APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File W-440-79 ; property located in the vicinity of 4827 Talbot Road South . 4. ARTHUR D. GUSTAFSON , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 14-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ( GUSTAFSON ADDITION ) , File PP-441-79 , AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH , File E-448-79 ; property located on west side of Union Ave. N . E . , approximately 200 feet south of N ., E . 10th St. 5 . MERCURY MARINE , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE/DISTRIBUTION AND TRAINING CENTER IN M-P ZONE , File SA-442-79 ; property located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Lind Ave. S . W . and S . W . 41st St. 6 . MICHAEL R. MASTRO , APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 175-UNIT MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING PROJECT IN R-3 ZONE , File SA-447-79 ; property located approximately 800 feet south of N . E . 4th St . and approximately 800 feet west of Union Ave. N . E . between Greenwood Cemetery and Union Ave . N . E . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the -Renton Planning Department . • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 18 , 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED December 7 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I . SIEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF TqUABOvE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 5th day of December , t/ 19 79 . __-~— SIGNED _Irlf/_,- 7144400r).7 - OF R4, . A 0 o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n mmir s CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 4 235- 2550 O,9gTft, SEPTEM��P MEMORANDUM November 28, 1979 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By: Roger J. Blaylock, Associate Planner RE : DECEMBER 4TH AGENDA. The four items that were continued over to the December 4th agenda are presently at the same stage that they, were when continued. No further information has been received on the Mull rezone, Valley Office short plat , and Valley Office special permit. Mr. Craig Johnson, representing the Mull rezone, has contacted this office to set up an appointment . This appears to be too late for the Planning Department to provide you with a suitable supplemental staff report . In the case of Eden Estates, we received yesterday an applica- tion for an exception. Therefore, we would request that Eden Estates be continued until December 18th. No agenda items are scheduled for December 11th. There will be one additional new item on the agenda, Brown Temporary Permit (note agenda attached) . RJB:wr Attachment RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER N0V2 ': 1979 AM P4 • 718a91194.1tLf1a`• 1314a516 CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 4, 1979 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9aOO A.M, ; COUNCIL CHAMBERS; SECOND FLOOR, RENTONMUNICIPAL. BUILDING OLD BUSINESS : R-412-79 HERBERT E. MULL Application for rezone from G-7200 to R-3; property located on Sunset Blvd. N.E. between N.E. 7th St . and N.E. 9th St . PP-430-79 MARK HEACOCK (EDEN ESTATES) Application for preliminary plat • approval for 8-lot single family subdivision; property located on the north side of N.E. 28th St . between Kennewick Pl. N.E. and Aberdeen Ave. N.E. SHORT PLAT 431-79 VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK,' INC. SUBDIVISION NO.' 1 Application for 4-lot 25-acre indus- trial short plat ; property located on Lind Ave. S.W. between S.W. 16th St . and S.W. 19th St . SP-424-79 VALLEY OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL PARK,' INC. Application for special permit for fill and grade in H-i zone; . property .located on southwest corner of the intersec- tion of 16th Ave. S.W. and Lind Ave. S.W. NEW BUSINESS : - -- TP-437=79 - CHARLES R. BROWN -- Application for temporary permit to allow continuation of an existing trucking operation in a G-9600 zone; property located in the vicinity of 2005 N.E. 51st St . • �LL ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 6, 1979 APPLICANT: MARK HEACOCK AND PETER TIERSMA FILE NUMBER: PP-430-79 (EDEN ESTATES) A. SUMMARY &PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests preliminary plat approval of an 8-lot single family subdivision . B. GENERAL, INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA 2. Applicant : MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA 3. Location : On NE 28th Street between Kennewick Place NE and Aberdeen Avenue NE 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5. Size of Property : ±2. 9 acres 6. Access : Via NE 28th Street 7. Existing Zoning: G-7200, Residence Single Family; minimum lot size 7200 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-7200 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential , Greenbelt 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on October 26, 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on October 26 , 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1835 of August 23, 1960. It was rezoned from P-1 to G-7200 on May 20, 1974 by Ordinance #2852 . A six-lot subdivision was approved on the site in May of 1976, File Number PP-838-75 by the Renton City ,Council . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site rises from west to east at slopes ranging from 12-16%. 2. Soils : Alderwood and Kitsap soils , very steep (AkF) . Slopes are very steep . Drainage and permeability vary. Runoff is rapid to very rapid, and the erosion hazard is severe to very severe. The slippage potential is severe. These soils PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING; MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA, File No PP-430--79 NOVEMBER 6 , ) 1979 (EDEN ESTATES) PAGE TWO are used for timber. Indianola Loamy Fine Sand (InC) . This soil has rapid permeability, available water capacity is moderate, runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil is used for timber and for urban development . 3. Vegetation : The subject site is heavily wooded with numerous evergreens and some deciduous intermixed. 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water : No water was observed on the subject site although the drainage basin of Honey. Creek is located along the northerly portion (October 26, 1979) . 6. Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped with scattered single family homes located to the south, east and west . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are principally single family residential in nature. F. PUBLIC SERVICES : - 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main extends east-west on NE 27th Street within 200 feet to the south of the subject site and a 12" main runs north-south on Kennewick Place NE approxi- mately 200' to the west . A 12" sanitary sewer is also located on NE 28th Street . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Routes #142 and 144 operate along NE 27th Street . 4 . Schools : Kennydale Elementary School is within 4 mile to the west of the subject site while McKnight Junior High School is approximately one mile to the south and Hazen Senior High School is within 3 miles to the east . 5. Recreation : Kennydale Lions Park is located approximately * mile to the southeast and the North Highlands Park one mile to the southeast . G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1. Section 4-729; "G" , General Classification District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-106; Preliminary Plat - Requirements. 2. Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report , 1965, Objective 6 , page 18 and Residential , page 11 . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: . 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will remove the vegetation , disturb the soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area. Through proper development controls and procedures , however, these impacts can be mitigated. n ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT.. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA, File No PP-430-79 NOVEMBER 6 , 1979 (EDEN ESTATES) PAGE THREE 2. Population/Employment : The proposed plat of 8 lots will increase the area population by approximately 28 persons (3. 5 persons/home times 8 homes) . 3. Schools : The proposed subdivision will increase the school population by approximately 45 students ( . 5 student/home times 8 homes) . These new pupils will likely be scattered throughout the grades and not significantly impact the existing services . 4. Social : Development of the subject site will result in increased opportunities for social interaction among the area residents. 5. Traffic: The new plat will increase traffic in the area by approximately 80 .trips per day (10 trips/unit times 8 new units) . J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental. Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division (no response received) . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division (no response received) . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division (no response received) . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division (no response received) . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . (copy attached) 6. City of Renton Police Department . (copy attached) L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of single family residential use for the site and surrounding area. 2. In 1975 and 1976 a residential subdivision of 10 lots was reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council . The final approval placed 5 conditions on the preliminary plat and reduced the number of lots to 6. The situation has not been modified substantially since that time. 3. Access to the site was the principal point of concern expressed in the original review. Section 9-1108(23)A(5) states that residential access street rights-of-way shall not be less than 50 feet wide . The present access to the subdivision is supplied by an existing 25 ' right-of-way, which extends from Aberdeen Avenue NE to Kennewick Place NE, along the south boundary of the subject property. 4. The applicant has not submitted a request for an exception to this requirement . 5 . The access question is complicated by the fact that Aberdeen Avenue NE is not improved and is actually a cul-de-sac, with this development further extending the cul-de-sac to 1020 feet , in conflict with 9-1108-23A which specifies an 800 foot maximum length. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : The public hearing cannot be completed without the exception being heard for both access width and cul-de-sac length. Therefore , it is recommended that the public hearing be continued until December 4, 1979 to allow the applicant time to submit the appropriate exception requests. _ em.....�,. _ ,M..�-...,w.. a.n. _ ._ if f - - , to° III �i}• , 9 "Y4 '': 1 • _ - -AMINIIIIIMME � 7 104 I I I`r 5' �i ,.\l »� I• I �y// .! • .A.. . . , 105 k n2 1 . ' n..1�J ?ter ^�.5.�f r --------- ,I • N:IMO • it • 11 f 118 7 G ] '�' ' pax O D 1 __ t - i • 93 r- % -1 .. l, I , z 111111111IILII peeee lemen2� ..•. d ,....,+ .er.Y..y i5,5T a.•. — -- — — SE i__1_ Is si..as 7 _ �_1 lI,Ieeeeeeeeeee, —Rim, 2• I `9 70 ,l . \ J ; � �11 N1111 LaI'/l e7 0 i• l � , l a_ x: u .L, inn 111111111W11i- 4 , ____1 ]G5 3G4 1 372 90/' iI; • yr ]73 r `Nairn r ■IN1111N1111/1111 eri 33 ]Z #. i g :. 1 ..1` I I 374 .�1111111111w 11H111 ` —__ 17 76 367• 3r..1. !: ._ 1 �11111I@1161iL111W a 35 , I 1 i1®Il11p 1i11111l111lii - a`' I r _ .r_ , f/ 1 110Z 1° 11111II1ni II um' '�..-E I ?! = 5 m Gs.i. , � '.�1 �, II 'I111111II11i_ �;,, L I •' ® 'S �,'4 s - -'PACIFI !!p !'IOIij � •I "" r ��I' r r I1trs � �,..._.:... �r ■ + 1 { _--- _11 \ 1 ZOI ZGO LS9 39 I 2I78T Z21 ' 2I20 205 ° KEN TON Cl. t I{ { --11 --• .172i -- ,... i in to f---‘,. 21,1 it. ____ - :77; -,,-,-, , - 1 -lz„ — _ ] '' \ +5..f I ••v""7. `"`e a. 2 5 276 ,___r r zao 2371 222 2,9 ZC4 : -I 'r\ '�. o 4 ,} - 279 - Ii1`S5 .i-_ N., le - ` a■ �- , w 295 Let 274 71Q1 . zsa gal 234. ZZ3 i� za,'.., 2 n. T-- \ . 21 Ili- ;�{ I a • I t�� 'L t° F,. a I r- 1 a, • l j{. TM I 1 I i I r--I N G 24T \ , . 3 z — ,,i I --, 5`T--7 r-- x n.w l _.__T - 1 a .s,1 i f3 .1\ • Q N E 2 30%7 2a2 235 2241 , [yaaJ i I i5]0 -'=�- 26j2'3 26225 ' _ • . � L I tia-- t I G . 2..--..-,....1.•L - - -' r •-' , I .y..,,..... .-,.,.,;,2c I1I —7•� I � 5 �'"a®Z�ja 225 a � L I . i I \' � � 340 �II 293 2!ea ' 272 = r.-� :f o_'��' � I � ''1 , � pyyr,, ({. q 1 la, r---' _ r-_ i s �gl,�-•t .,..J.,...1 ......i S 5 In1 F3 S..w ` �....x.�.u.�.....�.. , -_�_..:..su ' n ■,. •.....,..,,. r - yi 1 � ; 1 MARK HEACOCK & PETER TIERSMA PP-430-79 (EDEN ESTATES) i 1 i 4 '.57= ..2222S^ X..7.27=7237.25 .RL]•Iva .S7r�.Crstaar r. ,gSII.,6»1A:2.22 ^"'T ==772 '- 1 APPLICANT Mark Heacock and Peter Tiersma TOTAL AREA_+2. 9 acres 1 1 PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via NE 28th Street • . l EXISTING ZONING G-7200 1 ( i I EXISTING USE . Undeveloped 1 1 PROPOSED USE 8-lot single family subdivision fi COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential ; Greenbelt • i COMMENTS i m , , enton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A p p it i cat i o n o ,3 Mi6"liA c p- 4,0 V /a. ,-,r199. Location: op, ire cReaAtsv, q e3 �� oily a ,ianc �,,,,,i_e 4 NE eJ 6/ Applicant : ` `�' e TO :_ P ,rks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :J /7 ' Police Department A, Ro C, MEETING to/2,4/ • Public Works Department : Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division 4 Utilities Engineering Fire Department IN •��J�ITrNGPF(�Gl I�LT��VLIC��IONI��FV��EdSCOJP IE6�TIOr SLIOUI D BF PROVIDED � CONFERENCE (ARC) 10 BE HELD ON l 1 /`lei AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CO, ROuN. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WiL CONFERENCE TO AATTENQ THEE ARC, PL ASE PROVIDE THEN COMMENTS TO THE NLANNOINGBDEPARTMENT BY__ UU M ON '- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : _-l� r e :��_�__-- � Lff-4.I�-_ r T �� _.��obi_ — _ Approved __ _Approved with conditions Not Approved J , , (.' , 6) ..--e-7---- o c.__..... . ii.. ..„, / /r/ 7_,:,:::c---1.--r54- '- Af,_) ---,u - 7 ' _ Siqr (.1.4)._,.., .._(...f 6 (_ ' a-47--' -i....A._.‘,..' ,--y%,___6-' k_----. (..(;`),--L----- al tur TT Di reC for or Aut.horir.cd Representative ate --- — REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved _ Approved with conditions Not Approved • Signature of Director or Authori ed—Representative Date ' .:'enton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : e)® ally 4& 61(tresk Location : OAAve- 40 eepii(StiotetApgele . :.NEB ertl 4.0-e4/6 Appl icant : 19..e a 'Mark 6 nerainnez. ' pier. B 1 f f" TO : / Parks Department SCHEDULED ED HEARING DATE . fA/477 Police Department A, R. C. MEETIPJG__�®/�.��'�� Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department INPI� ITINVFNGNTAINIEONIfTVI��IS A'P�ICATIO�� Sf-IOU � � PROVIDED ! COVF RENCE ARC NE HELD ON AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE 1 F YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT �BE ABLE TO ATT NI8DTHEM ARC, P1L ASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 3: UREVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: _ Approved Approved with conditions. Not Approved 7)Z:L Lu-) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative / Date . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved Signature of Directoror Authorized Representative Date N Affidavit of Publication • STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. t'•s"•::+;,•nm : }�'.9til111 being first duly sworn on oath,deposes and says that..�R:.3 is the 2`?-0 sr....f 1. .Y, of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been NOTICE OF for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, PUBIC HEARING printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper RENTON LAND USE published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is HEARING EXAMINER now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the RENTON,WASHINGTON aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record A public hearing will be Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior held by the Renton Land use Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Hearing Examiner at his re- gular meeting in the Codncil Chambers, City Hall, Re- Washington.That the annexed is a...;'.;,;{; .0 ._4snr ..rr, nton, Washington, on November 6, 1979, at 9:00 ., t"r r. a.m.to consider the follow- s iing petitions: 1. FRED W. REEBS, as it was published in regular issues(and APPLICATION FOR not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MEDIC- AL OFFICE BUILDING IN R-3 ZONE, File SP- of '{ consecutive issues,commencing on the 425-79;property located on Talbot Road South south of S.W. 43rd St. is day of ' ,19 t g,and ending the - 2. MARK HECOCK (EDEN ESTATES), AP- s 4 PLICATION FOR PRE- +1.LIMINARY PLAT AP- day of 19 both dates PROVAL, File PP-430- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- 1 79; property located on scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee j_ charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.2.}e.27which Public Notices has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the north side of first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent 28th St to deen N.E. � /aberdeen Ave N E.and insertion. Ken- ( � /� , Legal descriptions ��'�L. -�-- �•L-^' a applications noted abovef re on/lie in the Renton Planning pepartment. e Z7'{ sa d►t interested persons to be Petdtons are invited fo Subscribed and sworn to before me this ?rid day of hearing on ent N�he blic their o•t 9:00 a'm to express ,:::.1..-.......:.2 , 19(.:;:... pinions. Gordon Y. Ericksen /; /� Renton Planning' (eN,6, �.( Published in • �Rirector Notary Publ1c i a tFie State of Washin t i cord Chronic/0 a�tY Re- residing at Kent, King County. 26' 1979. R5859� October , —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June ' - ' 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 Rev.7-79 !il , , r.;.,,,,,, cl. 4.,,,;, 1'..4:A 4,,,, Aviiiio .1 4,:zigtik...t r:.,:r7:.!,,k1 : r-i'L .-, J'Atit), srks .r k,4;. iS�� t', d �� 1 1 j war 'fY`" 'Y;'r•• r P ?^?f S o, T.1'0,, , N e i ' ` i��: t ,•zip,,' '`4Q�p ci • �• • iyNk�;,, ;'r' I i °[, , .4 1 lnt • r 1 t p c"•` S a i. to:d "A,. A4.' }� F rr, :a u ' ' c 11t ' 'd S I. r sR F t l , tr } •etr` � •. �a •y'Hr"P9 '� bfi r r �'� �� i. '' i. ,. L `. y ..T 4^r'ri 4u 3 •° 'k r ' f t,fit, GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF N .E. 28TH STREET BETWEEN KENNEWICK PLACE N .E. AND ABERDEEN AVENUE N. E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 9 S POSTE . TO No I FY PROPERTY ® , 6 E S OF TO :-"E HELD I , . CITY. G •FUNCDL CHAP BERS, , UNDCDPAL BUILDING ON NOVEMBER 6, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. 6. ri.r i`\ 4`.,M ]TrEi:* 5. Il r P Z* N117 . II 5 pr.44x P E r‘ '''vl [IT , 0-,, 61, ..) r.-0 0-1,, • .., i% , • IN, iT%' 7 1 *:4 I' -' 1. 4- • if 4', ,.- . • XeNA i -" f a ks :r rr , mi ,. ` 'r t9'b 'h �.r ,r •A t +i'+' a ,s4. 11,,ytik:' z€;inwur una °� 4 rM+x•re ` i i r w=-r, •r , T 8-LOT PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL PI SING) E •FAM11 Y RESIRENTIAI SIIR11IVTSTON F'•lR FURTHER INFORMATION C>{,LL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NIT TO BE REMOVE" WIT OUT PROPER AU IZATI=*N OF i ;qt.), ri oTHE CITY ts;F RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 - _ `` R V C HARLES J. DELAURENTI OR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT • _ �°9 ®- • 6, - - - - - D 233- 2550 0,9�T�D ��O0 P - - - SEP1 • October 24, 1979 • Mr. Mark Hecock 32468 22nd Ave . S.W. Federal Way , Washington 98003 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR PRE- LIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 8-LOT SINGLE FAMILY • RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION, File PP-430-79 ; property located on the north side of N.E. 28th St . between Kennewick Place N.E. and Aberdeen Ave. N.E. Dear Mr. Hecock: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on October 2 , 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for November 6, 1979 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director By flog J. • laylock Associate Planner cc: Pete Tiersma 24034 - 24th S. Kent , WA 98031 Kenneth Oyler P. 0. Box 2258 Renton, WA 98055 I r � II NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL. , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON NOVEMBER 6 19 79 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. FRED W. REEBS , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING IN R-3 ZONE, File SP-425-79; property located on Talbot Road ' South south of S.W. 43rd St . 2. MARK HECOCK (EDEN ESTATES) , APPLICATION FOR PRE- LIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL, File PP-430-79; property located on the north side of N.E. 28th St. between Kennewick P1. N.E. and Aberdeen Ave. N.E. Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on • file in the ' Renton Planning Department . • • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON _ NwF �gER �� 1979 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON V. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED October 26 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , _aTENE nuIS0j _ , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE -ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before 'me , a Notary Public , on the 24thday of October _ , 19 79__ i __ — SIGNED r /V•,•. .r • CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON rRE NtENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLISTI FORM ; `��`�• � Ca le, 19�,`� �� ww�ww 00 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY / /, „e)/ `�pejIpte•OP/ ,9 Q, Application No. ^�c? �lQr' p i9- 4/30. NNI�G p�� • Environmental Checklist No. , 4(7,!' PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: • Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance • Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of, this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such' a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your ' explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which • you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though corrnletion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agenciesiwhich will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- • out duplicating' paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is 'a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer, it "no" and continue on to the next question.' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND I. Name of Proponent /Ct; et-fby >a ` ' ``,7°t� 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: ,'1e:9 4 2 ' 4 14'. & g}. 2.5tovi 214 1.6.51 3. Ogte Checklist submitted Or 4. Agency requiring Checklist ,�� -.qi"-/`l a/f-,��7 O -,Q 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: • , �- 6. M ture and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : • -2- • • '. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as t ,e extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental1setting of the proposal ) : • aft l 1,4 � s'�° - °w' �` ''c• , /4" s` 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones): Peg m 75 C"e-eV 12 4e. ��,�/'�? , , 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: fed f� • • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by • your proposal ? If yes , explain: • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: SST. Ylo • • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) • (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES uv NN •• e• {, )., Disrr:ptions, displacements, compaction or over- , • ', . covering ,of the soil? a°°' t•, p - YES MAYBE NO • (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBE 0— (d) The destruction,_ covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES a9AYR- in— (e) Any, increase in wind or water erosionof soils , either on or off the site? YES MA,IBE NO (f) Changs in deposition or erosion of beach sands . or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which - may modify the channel of a river or ytream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or .lake? Explanation: (,0 o61,/5,21}0'� r`a,O i'� _ , . ;PO TES— r �s�e 9 ,0 6F 41y 4.w p pR, ( ��d�.. ti7 d, f , rF� r* eS f.'6,.i'/#�`.,"/„,) per z ` ` 44/9 /ariP, c t` ,Ea 4'. ., I f -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) ', Al emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? too' U (b) ' The creation of objectionable odors? we' j YES 1Y ! ri0 (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, 'or any change in climate, either locally or .e0/ regionally? • YtS MAYBE NO Explanation: . • • (3) Hetor,. Will the proposal result in: (a) , Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE 07 (b), Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ✓� ,.• YES MAYBE 0' (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YET- MAYBE El-6- (d) , Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . • YES MAYBE ti-6" (e) Discharge into surface waters . or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited •to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE 0- (f) Alteration-of the direction or rate of flow of • v„• ground waters? YET" MAYBE 3. (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through ewe interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE WU- (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? VET MAYBE 0� • (1 ) , Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available: • fol public water supplies? j �; vEs i Explanation: �'�,✓C" Wolper /'r-. ' 4 WO, 7 C5'i ,4914.1 T4 2.06490e (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops. 6,0► microflora and aquatic plants)? YET- MAYBE 0- (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique . rare or endangered species of flora? YET. VOW NO (c) lntroduction of new species of flora into an area. or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing • species? YLS tiAYBf= fi0 (d) teduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? fin`'" ��c r NYBE NO RENTp� planation: C) LLI �c.4 A, I N G Oc�Q -4- (5) Fauna'. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , ,insects or microfauna)? Yes mfiY3L Pa0-- (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES W�9YBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? f S FATE Frr (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Ter e MAYBE NOExpl nation: AW 4�'eLa*��,W4Jtai ._ kge4, �? MO�.c F,..A.,� L 1' / 4, 'r '( 7,f RA c-sie i'd-4- ,€7 .I (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? vA I YES MAYBE NO . Explanation: itliare4t 3,4Z! // 4 ' -, DO 7Z go:7C/ cal7r(4e, 4/1.4-)61 • (7) . Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or • glare? S FUME No Explanation: • s. (2 G !°.)4.,.Q24w4,f4i t�/5/i7 ad `, AVAWArecclr (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? �i PAS MAYBE ii Explanation: I ! • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (,a' Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES WARE NS (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? V!! MAYBE NO Explanation: • (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an • explsron or the release of hazardous substances (including,. but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? • 5 MAYBE 1747 Explanation: . • (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Vn— RUM- i-S Explanation: /IPC4 42: PCee,,.i6.47/�, " -5- - ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or per, create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? t� VAS MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand , for now parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YlU— MAYBE lam? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? a� Yam- MAYBE T0 (e) JAlterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? VY3� )MAYBE PdS (f, ) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles. bicyclists or pedestrians? toe " �� ITS M PJ Explanation: ( � � riA/ ? 2Z) aedi Ale s (/�� i,e,E d,.:1,40 e,,�® ms t ', PJ r�' Hwy POSII6C (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or . result in a need for new or altered governmental services - itany of the following areas : (ai) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO (b) Police protection? 'YES MAYBE PJ (c') Schools? TES- PIS NU- (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO too (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES VTR- NO Explanation: (15) Energy.. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? , - MAYBE far (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? a - REIY! YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? oT IY 0 F� YES MAYBE NO (c) !dater? h ti YES MAYBE NO • • •\ ay -6- ,(d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? vt r T C J F riff 1'1Y (f) Solid waste and disposal? •v" YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? PET— MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of • any, scenf -vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? • • TIES MAYBE NO • Explaination: •• • • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the . quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? vet-- !GYBE d'd0 Explanation: • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical d site, structure, object or building? YES FilYBE N-D • Explanation: • III. SIGNATURE the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration Of on-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lacks of full disclosure on my part. • Proponent: /4,46,14( (signed) off--g, dame printed) I k�� City of Renton Planning Department 576 / , limmuw , ,smill. - s CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. MAJOR EE::RY /,, ' . RE/U). DATE REC' D, // /L $ // Ie l/f."°�(� � ) ENVIRONMENTAL FINAL 191(3 REVIEW FEE $ OC . F- .Z 1 RECEIPT NO. /A l/r - '�� .--'' , SM NO. q PUD NO. � N�i�C '��ePe- APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS — THROUGH 7 : 1. Plat N me & Location �--�� Yip :-- i'e. TES ,/"1 de—,i 7 -I.-: JV•,I_-. I: ,-1, c-Bill A Y,IA X?.r%,:d i l fl. /A1 x 41-7el ide��Il lk e , 1 6 cr 2 . No. Lots Total Acreage . ,- Zoning(;. -)-6 3 . Owner Mt. r/C tie c c:_k 4- l<'__'7l 0 v ( ..;() .5-61 tG Phone r• ' "t'37,•, Address 0910 4/ :'7� -S k ., + . (.r11f< . 5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed Telephone ( ,,k-' ) ( ) ( ) Electric ( bi. ) ( ) ( ) Street Lights (k ) ( 9) ( ) Natural Gas ( ) („V) ( ) TV Cable ( ) (_,,,K) ( ) 6 . Sanitation & Water: ( _ ) City Water ( XL.) Sanitary Sewers ( ) Water District No . ( ) Dry Sewers ( ) Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 8 . DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION: TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED APPEALED EXPIRED 10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : DATE DATE BOND NO. AND TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . Rev. 1/77 -1 �� AFFIDAVIT 4 I , t & Ri _ -1- c__ A. i_, Iw,sN44 , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this / day of (9C_tC?�R-P C J , 19 3 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at /,p,eea v-7.-G,_,) . r4t4A.C. 647---eifsc---e-- 42.:1-- ...r.Z:,,,,--i N of Notary public) (Signature of Owner) A-I LI/,/.9-1 o0) Zl}/,2--), S4- "`.241-V S . (Address) (Address) (City) (State) ? 1 C,2) (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton„,P.rarmg 'ng Department governing the filing of such application . r7 <„ XL.T+11L Date Received , 19 By: 1 r� ��' " enton P1 Ong Dept . AFFIDAVIT - , 411 I , "L PL nc j� l RSNIA4. , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this / day of OC / , 19 7y , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at pp j)rt . MMACL...... �? �- " '.n N of Notary ublic) (Signature of Owner) rY -1.1,6 ./Wia_v) r a,), SDI-- " 4-Ta ,-S (Address) • (Address) • cKE.:J\c-r- Q 4--s 4 (City) (State) (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certifythat the foregoing application g g has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to • conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton�,P 'ng Department governing the filing of such application . ,," R E ill 2, Date Received , 19 By: 14-- r�`''' -n' c enton P1a`' ng Dept .