No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-121 RENTON CITY COUNCIL July 6, 1981 Regular Meeting Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF RICHARD STREDICKE, Council President; JOHN REED, EARL CLYMER, COUNCIL ROBERT HUGHES and RANDALL ROCKHILL. Councilmen CHARLES SHANE and THOMAS TRIMM arrived at 8:02 P.M. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; LT. DON PERSSON, Police Department; and GLADYS HARDING , Recorder. PRESS MARY SWIFT, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL Correction: Add John Reed to Roll Call of Council . MOVED BY 6/22/81 STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF JUNE 22, 1981 , WITH CORRECTION. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the business matters included: Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared week of July 13-19, 1981 , as Renton Arts and Crafts Festival Week. Council concur. Appointment Mayor Shinpoch appointed Robert D. Var Horne and Gary S. Ryser to the Fire Department position of Firefighter effective July 7, 1981 , due to the vacancies created by Robert Beatteay and Donald Goodwin on disability leave. Retirement has been indicated. Council concur. Block Grant Planning Department , Housing and Community Development requested Funds appropriation of $308,060 Block Grant Funds into General Budget, Current Fund Planning Department for 1981 projects. The projects/ programs are Housing Assistance Program ($80,000) , Senior Housing/ Pedestrian Corridor Development ($54,851 ) , Liberty Park Community Center ($25,000) , Planning and Administration ($38,209) , Health Care ($19,500) , Youth Services Program ($15,000) , YWCA Emergency Housing Study ($3,000) , Senior Transportation Program ($2,500) and Lake Desire Day Lodge, administration of grant award ($70,000) . Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance and authorization for Mayor and City Clerk to sign all necessary contracts. Normandy Park Police Chief Hugh R. Darby requested Mayor and City Clerk to prisoners sign agreement with City of Normandy Park to house prisoner ' s in Renton jail facilities. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Latecomer Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director, requested the Agreements Mayor and City Clerk to sign latecomer agreements with (1 ) E. K. Lidzbarski , water and sewer line, Earlington Gardens; and (2) PACE Corporation, sewer extension, Union Avenue N.E. Council concur. Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Pacific Northwest Bell in the amount Pacific N.W. of $259.53 alleging cable damage at 9211 S .E. 192nd, Kent. Refer Bell to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Six-Year Traffic Engineer Gary Norris requested that July 20, 1981 , be set Transportation for public hearing for review and adoption of the Six-Year Transporta- Program tion Improvement Program 1982-1987. The hearing is set and the 'matter referred to the Transportation Committee. Dick Poitras Hearing Examiner Fred Kaufman requested the preliminary plat of Preliminary Dick Poitras, PP-121-81 , for three-lot commercial subdivision, Plat-121-80 south side of N.E. 4th Street , 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. , be approved as the required submission of the revised map was received on July 2, 1981 . Council concur. Consent MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, ACCEPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Agenda PRESENTED. CARRIED. Approval 1 Renton City Council 7/6/81 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Automatic Letter from Fire Chief Richard Geissler requested operation of Mutual Aid fire suppression and/or emergency medical aid equipment outside the Response with normal fire department boundaries of the Cities of Renton and Tukwila Tukwila. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, THAT COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF FIRE CHIEF GEISSLER AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AND CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Annual 4th of Councilman Stredicke humorously pictured the annual 4th of July July Baseball baseball game - Senior Citizens vs. City Council . Stredicke, Game being the only Councilman present, recruited players: former Mayor Charles Delaurenti , Mayor' s Assistant, Park Director and Park Department personnel , two on-duty Firemen (uniforms on field) . Stredicke announced Council won the ballgame - 7 to 5 - first time since the senior citizen challenge began at the '76 Bicentennial celebration. Stredicke presented the trophy and Council Members cheered that their strategy had won the game; Clymer recalling his '80 injuries. Mayor Shinpoch noted Administrative Assistant Parness was temporarily disabled and unable to come to work Monday. • Green River Councilman Shane inquired re Green River Valley P-1 Channel program Valley P-1 and was advised of public hearing with Kent/Tukwila 7/8. Councilman Channel Stredicke inquired re conflict of interest due to ownership of property in the area. City Attorney Warren called attention to the large area of Renton and Kent involved including hillsides, noted various problems of direct ownership and direct impact. Public Safety The Public Safety Committee recommended approval of Renton Western Committee Days and Sidewalk Sale on July 30, 31 , and August 1 , with South Third Report Street being closed to traffic hour at 10:30 a.m. , August 1 for Chairman Hughes parade and bed roll and Williams Avenue South between South 2nd and South 3rd Street being closed August 1 from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. for street market and entertainment events. The Committee also recommended that the parade permit fee be waived. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. ROLL CALL: 3-AYES: TRIMM, HUGHES, ROCKHILL. 3-NOS: STREDICKE, REED, SHANE. CHAIR VOTED AYE. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Clymer abstained from voting, being a member of the Renton Merchants Association, sponsor of the event. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance #3558 The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final readings Puget Drive S.E. and adoption of an ordinance authorizing condemnation of property Condemnation for construction of additional improvements to Puget Drive S.E. Proceedings Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMNEDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3559 The Ways and Means Committee recommended second and final readings L. I .D. #320 and adoption of an ordinance and summary for construction and installation of water mains and hydrants , vicinity of N.E. 27th Street between Edmonds Avenue N.E. and Devil 's Elbow, Renton. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AND SUMMARY. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. First Readings The committee recommended first reading of the following ordinances: L. I .D. #324 An ordinance was read ordering construction and installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage, street lighting, paving, sanitary sewer and watermain, vicinity of Talbot Road and South 37th Street, establishing Local Improvement District No. 324. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, TO REFER THE ORDINANCE AND SUMMARY BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. • For Use By City Cllerk's Office Only A. I . # 4 AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of July 6, 1981 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. PP-121-80; Dick Poitras; Consent X Request for Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 2-25-81 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A conditions Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Amount Appropriation- Expenditure Required $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The Examiner's report for the subject preliminary plat was published on February 25, 1981 ; approval was conditioned upon submission of a revised preliminary plat map. On June 21 , 1981 , the revised map was received, and the matter is being forwarded to the Council for approval at the regular meeting of July 6, 1981 . PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: 10 See page 4 of the attached report. q -74 C`,‘`k oti�s O� 'j SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOC NTA..LON' • OF 0 ° THE CITY OF RENTON „ F-.o., MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 tt helL o BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER A O FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 94TEC July 1 , . 1981 Mr. George Runnels t. William Tsao & Company 2367 Eastlake Avenue E. Seattle, WA 98102 RE: File No. PP-121-80; Dick Poitras; Preliminary Plat Request. Dear Mr. Runnels : Following receipt of the required revised plat map on June 24, 1981 , the referenced matter will be placed on the City Council agenda of July 6, 1981 for review and approval by that body. You will receive notification of all action taken by the City Council regarding this application.: Please feel free to contact this office if you require further information or assistance. Sincerely, 4.‘Ck0.4•AVia, P Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department For Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner . For Agenda Of July 6, 1981 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. PP-121-80; Dick Poitras; Consent X Request for Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution • Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner' s Report, 2-25-81 Other B. Approval : C. Legal Dept. Yes No N/A COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A_ conditions Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The Examiner's report for the subject preliminary plat was published on February 25, 1981 ; approval was conditioned upon submission of a revised preliminary plat map. On June 21 , 1981 , the revised map was received, and the matter is being forwarded to the Council for approval at the regular meeting of July 6, 1981 . PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 4 of the attached report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. /� 206/324-8780 WILLIAM S. TSAO 8c.COMIA STY PS. Engineers&Architects Lyle N. Kussman, Architect • 2367 Eastlake Avenue E. • Seattle,Washington 98102 June 24, 1981 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner The City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: File No. PP-121-80; Dick Poitras Preliminary Plat Dear Mr. Kaufman: In reference to the subject matter, enclosed herewith are two copies of the plat and the revised site plan in compliance to your decision. At the present time, a Local Improvement District petition has been filed for the improvement of N.E. 4th between Union and Monroe to create a fifth lane for left turns. May we respectfully request that the fee for trip generation as stipulated in your findings be submitted to the City of Renton in the form of a bond guaranteeing the payment in the event that the local improvement district improvements cannot be materialized. Very truly yours, �• ,. 49 RECEIVED CITY OF nP\I n ON William S. Tsao HEARING E} `.NI°''r=R jf.E,,a R� .. {1 a�.cw:�, G� + WST:clk Q th enclosure cc. Planning Department Enclosure: Four copies of the plat and revised site plan • OF 1 �' •► -4r THE CITY OF RENTON ri rs 4" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o r BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER -Po FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 ,9gT6D SEP1 ,t • June 1 , 1981 Mr. George Runnels William Tsao & Company . 2367 Eastlake Avenue E. Seattle, WA 98102 RE: File No. PP-121-80; Dick Poitras Prleiminary Plat. Dear Mr. Runnels: . This office corresponded with you on March 12, 1981 , regarding revision of the plat map to reflect several conditions which were attached to the Examiner's approval of the matter. To expedite the process, we request that submission of the revised map occur prior to July 1 , 1981 . Otherwise, the matter will be dismissed with prejudice, and reapplication may not occur for at least one year. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if further assistance is required. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department • OF 1R4,, ., ' " ° THE CITY OF RENTON w�� ,fi ,• , MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER . -Po Pco FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9�TEO %OO March 12, 1981 Mr. George Runnels William Tsao & Company 2367 Eastlake Avenue E. Seattle, WA 98102 RE: File No. PP-121-80; Dick Poitras Preliminary Plat. Dear Mr. Runnels: The appeal period which was established upon publication of the Examiner's report regarding the referenced application expired on March 11 , 1981 . Normally the matter would be scheduled on the City Council agenda of March 16, 1981 for approval by that body; however, because a revised plat map including both lots of the Mastro Short Plat as required by the Hearing Examiner has not been received by the city, the file will be held by the City Clerk until the plat map is submitted. If you require further information regarding the aforementioned procedure, please contact this office. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Council Secretary AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 25th day of February , 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this Ain. day of \pAcu�x, , 19 'L I ,• kW3 '7\ • Notary Public in and for he State of Washington, residing at ,�1.11) Application, Petition or Case: Dick Poitras; PP-121-80 (The mi.nwtus contain a tizt 06 the pa ties og necond. ) • February 25, 1981 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Dick Poitras FILE NO. PP-121 -80 LOCATION: South side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks to replat the existing Mastro Short Plat (File No. Short Plat 352-79) into a three-lot commercial subdivision. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on January 6, 1981 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on January 13, 1981 at 9:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, presented the report, and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Plat Map The Examiner advised that the original large lot containing multifamily housing may be required to be included in the preliminary plat and an opinion would be obtained from the City Attorney. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was : George Runnels William Tsao & Company • 2367 Eastlake Avenue E. Seattle, WA 98102 Mr. Runnels submitted a site plan indicating proposed curb cuts for access to the subject site. The map was entered as follows by the Examiner: Exhibit 113: Site Plan Mr. Runnels explained that two curb cuts, 30 feet in width, are proposed onto N.E. 4th Street with several others located on the western boundary onto the driveway leading from the Mastro Apartment complex. The Examiner inquired if access easements have been obtained by the applicant from Mr. Mastro for the proposed joint access. Mr. Runnels advised that the property had been purchased from Mr. Mastro and acquiring access easements should be feasible. Mr. Blaylock stated that if a determination is made to include the site of the Mastro Apartments into the replat, access easements could be reviewed and designated on the face of the plat. The Examiner also noted that if access is desired to the other driveway on the east leading from the Mastro complex, a variance would be required to provide joint access because driveway curb cuts are not allowed to abut the side property lines. He then requested review of the site plan and testimony by the Traffic Engineer. Responding was: Gary Norris Traffic Engineer Mr. Norris indicated initial concern regarding the access from the subject site to N.E. 4th PP-121-80 Page Two Street due to concurrent development on the northern side of that arterial , and impending improvements on the roadway to include a two-way left turn lane. He noted that it is of significant importance that the driveways are not located in conflict with each other, and advised the department 's general policy to minimize access to promote free flowing traffic conditions on a major arterial such as N.E. 4th Street. Mr. Norris advised that discussion has occurred with Mr. Tsao who is also the engineer for the property to the north, and the two driveways as proposed do not appear to create an adverse situation. The Examiner requested further comments from the Planning Department. Mr. Blaylock indicated concern regarding the function of the shopping center facility which contains individual lots with common parking areas. He noted that the Planning Department had requested site plan approval due to concerns about ultimate design and use of the site and whether access and parking easements to each of the lots for the entire parking area should be required. The Examiner advised that provision of a joint driveway on common property lines to the east and west of Lot 2 would require application for a variance. Due to several unresolved questions regarding the application, he felt it necessary to continue the public hearing to allow application for a variance and submittal of a site plan to determine the actual impact of the proposal , particularly location of curb cuts and access onto driveways within the Mastro complex. He also stated that an interpretation of the State Enabling Act would be obtained from the City Attorney regarding the requirement for inclusion of the large lot containing the multifamily complex in the plat request. Mr. Runnels reviewed procedures utilized by King County for replatting through preliminary and final phases of individual lots previously short platted. The Examiner indicated that the necessity for application for a variance still remains as well as possible requests for exceptions from the Parking and Loading Ordinance to ensure that each lot provides adequate parking on the primary lot. He suggested that the Planning Department be contacted to clarify these issues prior to the continued public hearing. The Examiner requested further comments . Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. PP-121 -80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:47 a.m. and continued to February 10, 1981 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers. The hearing ways neopened on Febnuany 10, 1981, son the puhpo6 e 04 concujvwewt nevLew o 4 the pre imi,ncv y p&t and the . Lte p!an, F.Ue No. SA-008-81. However, .Ln4onma,tLon zupptied at the hearing diActozed the neeeim,cty 4on an addw.ti.ona2 continuance to allow 4wvithen nev4.4.ion o4 .o to p1anis because .tot 'sizes were iwsu64iei.ent to pnov.ide nevi/Led pa/thing. The hean.ing ways continued to Febnuahy 17, 1981 4on nevi.ew o4 both the pkaLmi.nany plat and the z to p!an. CONTINUATION: The hearing was opened on February 17, 1981 at 9:09 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, entered the following exhibit into the record: Exhibit #4: Revised Site Plan • Utilizing Exhibit #4, Mr. Blaylock explained revisions to lot lines which had been skewed in order to provide the appropriate number of parking spaces on each lot. He noted that although the Subdivision Ordinance would have allowed three accesses to N.E. 4th Street , the Environmental Review Committee had limited the project to two accesses due to heavy traffic volumes on the arterial . Mr. Blaylock advised that the Planning Department feels that the proposal meets requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance for the individual lots in providing a total of 61 parking spaces, although 66 spaces would be required if the proposal were considered as a shopping center. In conclusion, he stated that the preliminary plat should include the fourth lot which contains the existing apartment complex. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Lyle Kussman 2367 Eastlake E. Seattle, WA 98102 Mr. Kussman indicated concurrence in the revised site plan and had no further comments. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. Responding was: Lt. Don Persson Renton Police Department PP-121-80 Page Three Lt. Persson indicated support of the development of the area, but expressed concern regarding driveway widths onto N.E. 4th Street. He advised that existing narrow driveways along the arterial are 28 to 30 feet wide which causes drivers to stop in order to turn tightly into parking lots resulting in traffic congestion along N.E. 4th. He felt that a width of 40 feet should be provided to allow easy access into the shopping areas. The Examiner requested testimony in opposition to the proposal . There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department. Mr. Blaylock indicated that if the driveways were widened to 40 feet, the possibility exists that two parking spaces would be eliminated which would result in the necessity of reducing building size. Mr. Kussman stated that because landscaping strips are proposedion each side of the driveways, uncertainty exists regarding accommodation of 40-foot widths. He indicated willingness to review plans with the Planning Department, but he would be reluctant to reduce square footage of the buildings because two of the three are already leased. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. PP-121-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:20 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of a preliminary plat. The property proposed for division is part of an existing short plat which was approved in June of 1979. Pursuant to Attorney General Opinion (AGO) 1980 No. 5 and Section 9-1105(8) (B) , property which has been short platted within five years can be further divided only by filing a final plat. A preliminary plat must precede a final plat. This application followed. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The subject property is located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. The site is essentially level although sloping slightly upward toward the east. The site is undeveloped and is covered with scotch broom. 8. The applicant has proposed a three lot preliminary plat on a parcel which was short platted in 1979 (File No. Short Plat 352-79) . Under the construction of the statute of the Attorney General 's Office for the State of Washington and further advice from the City Attorney, the applicant must include all property which was part of the original short plat in the current proposal (Section 9-1105(8) (B) ; RCW 58. 17.060) . Therefore, the lot containing the Mastro Apartment complex, Lot 1 , of the Mastro short plat must be included within this proceeding. 9. The subject property is currently zoned B-1 (Business/Commercial) and the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject property is located as suitable for the development of commercial and greenbelt uses . 10. As indicated, the Mastro Apartment complex is located on the southern portion of the subject site. The Greenwood Cemetery is to the west, separated from the site by a power transmission line. The applicant proposes developing a small shopping center on the northern lots fronting on N.E. 4th Street. A site plan review hearing was held and the site plan was conditionally approved on February 20, 1981 . 11 . The three southerly lots each exceed 15,000 square feet. Each of the lots fronts on N.E. 4th Street. To minimize curb cuts, the three lots included within the small shopping center will share two driveways pursuant to site plan approval . The lot lines have been staggered to provide sufficient site area for buildings and required parking for each lot. PP-12,-J0 Page Four 12. Pursuant to Section 9-1106(2) (E) (2) , the applicant must provide for public streets and ways. The Traffic Engineer has determined that a fee of $20.00 per vehicle generated by the development of the subject site is required to help finance improvements to the roads and streets surrounding the subject site. 13. The Environmental Review Committee conditioned the Declaration of Non-Significance on the dedication of additional street right-of-way. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The subject proposal is currently incomplete and requires the submission of a plat which includes both lots of the previous Mastro short plat, File No. Sh. P1 . 352-79. The entire parcel must be included within the preliminary plat and the final plat. The redivision of land that had been the subject of a short plat within the last five years pursuant to both the State Enabling Act (RCW 58. 17.060) and the Renton Subdivision Ordinance (Section 9-1105(8) (B) ) requires the filing of a final plat which presupposes a preliminary plat. The plat must include all land within that previous land division. 2. Subject to such submittal the proposal appears to serve the public use and interest. The lots will all meet or exceed the size required by the Subdivision Ordinance and the Zoning Code. 3. The lots and proposed uses, a small shopping center, are compatible with the designation of the area in which the subject property is located as suitable for commercial development. 4. The applicant has submitted plans which limit the number of curb cuts and therefore limiting the number of locations for interference with through traffic on N.E. 4th St. 5. The subdivision and subsequent development will generate additional traffic on N.E. 4th Street, and, therefore, the applicant shall be required to pay a trip generation fee of $20 per daily vehicle trip as determined by the city Traffic Engineering staff. This fee will help offset the cost of needed improvement to the roads in the area surrounding the subject site and enable the project to provide for the public streets as required by Section 9-1106(2) (E) (2) . Since the apartment complex has already been developed, the fees will not relate back to that development but shall apply to the three lots proposed to comprise the small shopping center. RECOMMENDATION: Subject to the submission of a plat map of the four lot preliminary plat which shall include both lots of the Mastro short plat, File No. Sh. Pl . 352-79, and subject to the payment of the $20.00 traffic generation fee per daily vehicle trip, the City Council should approve the preliminary plat. ORDERED THIS 25th day of February, 1981 . 4"--;-13 1(0)0,k‘N Fred J. Ka man Land Use H ring Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of February, 1981 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: George Runnels, William Tsao & Co. , 2367 Eastlake Ave. E. , Seattle, WA 98102 Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer, City of Renton Lyle Kussman, 2367 Eastlake E. , Seattle, WA 98102 Lt. Don Persson, Renton Police Department TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of February, 1981 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Acting Public Works Director David Clemens, Acting Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Barbara Schellert, Planning Commissioner Ron Nelson, Building Official Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney ,,-121-80 Page Five Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 11 , 1981 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. • .1... . • . _I , I:•'.--f-•-•-,, ':' , (1 1 ",,,k,`it;•.i..:c .'•',:::: o.,.-tt.•::::_r-.!..:'. , (7."...,....., :;-.-.,,:."1-:1;:'SHORT PLAT 121-8 0 ,,,,,,,... ;„.•s,.....•••• ,',.,•-:•;,.".-::•- .‘ I . . DICK POITRAS , .. 'i,...v,--4-,r-‘,..-17,.• , . ',,k,••••41.-::::•-!..7",--:: 1. r . : i • i., • .,.- _ ... attrasurr f. . . Z I .-...• . . .._ i . .. , . . . • . . ! -- • .. ... _ . . ..-.---.i.--:-.,< .! I , . ..• . . .. • • •. . • - : - i--: :r;W•• t , • • . •., 1 i; ,i•cr,t lt -.. . . -... • -.. . ,- ,.. _ .- • . v.: • 4 6. ,„ ,1 . Il :•• 1.: 1/1.61 N{EY 1,4 ik-'r • • I • ... .. . .-- • - • .- •.s: . . : .. _1'.A1-R_ • • 1•4 C•VI-14 El(2i, t-. % - i. • K •j_.2,k_.-1 r 01: G U122;121y15.10/.1 ' i ` 1. . 4 •-, . .. .. .., ;.• _ (fl7rt.IMIP4M?,,,) ...• • . , - _ ---- 1•KLI:frfil.A.:::.'Ng 4" 61-REEr - - - ; " ''.. - . . ' ?•1: tlf:4,4,•:::!. FL.. , .:E :,:k. r ) - ,!-:' :. ,,.. ' '' •":.. :":-.7' T'lf S'ir"-::.:-...:' •"-i:F: • --, 0 /' . i .-e ; ' 1 1 .7,.. • •• . . .. NI. 1;....r f•L'.... ,1: ,...•. . 1 • . :/•!..:.ii:.1-C tV• /!-.e.e.4 . ; ,' ,; i 1 .,,.......-.,•:.• ;.1,.....,,.., • . •-• o. I '-_.- :, •' iI .z 1 1-71> ;F'. .”..i il .7. • , . •- • 7. • - . ' • !.. 1 •:".1't!°. "S.4.:.• , '1'. ;':. . ', . • • :'......7 r;F•11.0",': •'...,.. !. ' " . • -. . . . • . , .. .., ..' .- ; C.7.1."; .:.., • ::12. . . • : I :•A_ • . . -. . • • . . ... . . . !, 1.. 12 -(-;Z ',:-... I A .,. 11-1...;•b: • i 1-4••'. rl.••;,....,I f. .---,_-2..—.'—,..-"-2-......_/-21 -:.: , • I . ' - • --I • I •: .r•-• ,.1 •.1f, 7",": F:•-..*'',..F."•.‘-- •i .. . ./., . ' : :•:`-, ' . • -;' ; 1-..17-:`,,Y".::-.•!: —Fi /;,' -' • \ , •• i I,t'.•'"Iti:i LA 7C...".---- pf • - . . • •. . . . • , • . . .. •i-r:',%-.J.;-::`,Tii:-.-..- • • . - • • • •• 1 .:.-.,...::.:1::„..--,-.:,_• -1.. .-c _ . . • .. . . ,..a........._.!..,.,..-..i.'...,.:_.._.,_7.-1._ :;!:. ::••:.-7'.-_:-: • (.:7•-•-,-1 Kt rq •. . .. .... - •, • ._ • • • . •-•-•:'•-' , '..- ,'-.--..,-* • I/1.111... .i•-•k-. -:.. ' .. •. ..r 11? . r- ri N••`; . , - •- . -- - i • i 1 jl i' ri:•:--: „:.:-.•1. -.-=',,--•:•"-:--'---.•:•!•:::.-- ,:...,-.‘.-• c-i-i-!,;.,..,„ ,-.---: •.,,--.;••••.:.: ..--••,•;;,,-.4-4, • .-....',..: 1.-rattt. Pr:54:- erlo N _ . : • . tor a, CSITO geNetil 5HO Kr FLAT • . • . • -• ______. __• • 352-19)KING,COUNTY, 144511.) STVu-ATED I 14'NE ne Z 091-HE tz.TA ... __._.._ .. og svc•t4TZN, R5-6,kilt .A : s NrCOra, tiqFgc.No. wososzos . . sanartrrananasea J /:ll :': '�?ç ; . ,� '':{„ f.. 1 lwl!: .1J. J ;® t.1 •j.E.I�Syi., '•a, I* •f . cs I' �C •',1P...1~ ) • l'i''� '/ w ' . ' ! •,..........,--; r[•a �`0.,;�,'��-i•,F•�ff,....,.� �T' s , 1; •T a { �'+_:.J .• , 31.E •f�l., wi►d-r��?u+{�� m� =en 1�fuj'tl.� `{;� .1....1 , _.L'.3 Jsi,.�!✓S 0w + ,`f�i I, `rla j„.. J I -ti I. I•. .r_ ......i,, i-i.Tf.. -r ,, T ., rl,•,', rT'! ; 1T.r " y qP.i` a }m, , ▪ '. , J' - 1 S� j2 p:,` ; 1 .1'',....1�44' 1_i....1,..•I :.—1 •.1•f a 1' l- ,,,•�.....� „I 1 ,._.,r r 1 :p /5' f_.., -(r��7!_T_.f II Ce.,:t S r. * R7'*:1-:' //'^ I u•M.,,Mr•a., o.os.,_, "JJIC,-:i1 •1.1 .J Ll•ieL•1.J! ,1' w :�i.'L. L �F pt .(1 �'•c)0 2aemrre.w.�.o^wv.•a..1nva. • C,�",;., g;F`;! yj��te 1/4 .�cli rp- S.•'..i , •i .. l� ,� 1 ,1 U�' :i � � Iiii, {..jo K r. , _{• ;>. t' I `. ;�, ,•O 4 :••, 1 •• , i :,.....A'C^e7',' +', ,°I i ( •,_., u{n .{ .', -1_, r. .. • .y, .)?R1-4•„r£T..{,a:Cf,wU:ur,^..'a'1 I ' ''r :•''v :�. I: +)1 B ; .�. 1 .,TY '/.f.- tli.1''n;•' • , �0 f -ice y + ', yV /rfjy�� cs3a Q • ? -;yy l ..t • '.. .,'• E..1 II j• ,�!Yi y r'i.:'.ja�r. Tr47,,,• ;y,i alb 4•'.1. II wS21739 (t�:� !.M. t'X;°• a J i! • S.rca• '�•Yl.;' •;' �t �._1r.>:t!, ! t�-',,«l,-.sir +ft�a. '`,iY .C.V., V.1 .1 �:i.',.:•,{ a4 • •,.� `,. 11.1•.d 1 4i• : :1; :R• #,' t :LL.,.as,.n„zysq,a,,,,,rr.mv.o.,..N.....s.....+...a....t I'. rrcf•:• , FN�: ( ••= i..1- •/1 • ' r , d'�h"V,'1 ws .1.,11 i'. ,_t..L•..t..L'' I ' . f 7 1 - ;r.i-g} 11;1��• f,fM( ,I 9 4,._-)j':i.• i.. t, i .1. i_,1...1: ;;3 . ..:,,. .1 H �.r• I ''.TM , a--,,3 0L•-v 7„ 5200 I ; ,i. :11t. , '\.} ••. , t'z; fir...1 11;,:._ , xi , ;., 7-S 41 !1,•,', , ,:1; L'...7..,-i.. ,!_lvi •� O'Y I 1 •s, 'io/•11, ;, y tt! ,.1 , •!' . I !,:1."� , ,.�„ ,L.1,�,3.n, - i c i• ',. ,l rz„,�141, •. o� t! iN f . . s • r. a o r...: ,\,,'`'\ .; , .1 aka ('1_S I J , yea • L i I .. .. .� � ,1.: ' �'.4 •, U , �u'. 3•. ( ..—pd• g . J 11'' i y^iv• 'G;ss"'±+y9,..:v y` I �r , 6a nth® -. "�! ..R ��,,lyl.4,{... �• ' ..ia,{,Y,97... .4 a,.�� , l' ,,,., • ▪ )u '1 (• jr,l lT ,h, ��y.. 1. r._ h a ^ `j • _ ,i I I 1 I y,:('•i`_ >r .T•T,l.\.' "'•a•1,>.. , 1, •,'.i1• q 1.1:•,;,.........!,.,., �i.10 4 R�.. , ,:r,w. ,•p•S { 4I a 1 I r .:. .r•n i I i. f�:. `i . -=''',`', �p1 •'f",, fyy�'r.,1:,._ I' �,.rcri,�T,;�, $ t 1. , �."_C.:.� , }.�1 ',,,d..--. � ,•k..P_, 1Y.'_.•.1-.,l• _'•1 M • la _. i • a ••1•,`•, • ..,1. .. , i A n r 1 / it ! e ..1 'i•Y, .{ „,�• •.1,, t5 i iyi:i ., Jf, 1 I{,..`;� 7.�:.T..'n_Z.. ,1 ','iT i {.�.z . �,.'` 14 h.fg'1I i r oG✓ a�':l C..J g f 111 1 T o tR f.1.l a..i!• t '/I'.,. ', 1 �:;+ 1 F1 4 7 , f ' //" ( t• 1 ji> .{/. L� -�...,I.d..I..J`'tr,�nl,... .. , �.'i���?..�1'.7l { ', •,i+; .,��.� '1, "I 'r�'" `•t "•j 1 i rt ,ll .i.rr41"I,.l.+:....r11:.L1 i ..I•1�ITi'. , • , i i 115 '� ...,J• .� ./'�' '� !l. .., .,,,,,m ssr,, { 'F, .adt�•iss azt�ssra>iri. say..,-•r•-, ^1-,-•=7`•,... •.....,•,,,,.,y..•.r,•�- , 6� i�it''i,ki'.'�..0, J .=:-_J I ck ,rz...f 7-4..1.S.�f.f.. ; i Ma 1� """" ;�''�,� ft ;�..A. "ia { ,�- I ,1 r. enrarkl, 4maZ'aC=aaa'a_-b I U f p`L `�,, 1 y i 1 A Ji q '�1 1 1/. J' . .;Irrot goo. + L� f -1-----' t.., J� ¢�n1.MT,.iGII6 : I o 1.I V B�V W N "t�t I� , I r �r•�qf �, �q ppp 1 " 1,4 Apt;*'1 ' v 4. cI, ^__ hi ��j Q ,,4:q� l , ' �`�1 '-+ ' , 0./t 'ei,i �MH ____ � i ft, � 11 , --y,— 6✓' 11L•+'Yil sLNI .� }ii % . •1PO 1 n 7((L�' , ,c,„;11 • R � 1 . 1.�. 1 11 :� ; s'.x:h::?..69' ;.:. •��*'••�'-t%•..�I.}w\7„ ..«.. P . ..'r- -` 4` f ;rAc.,1,/,7"7"1. Li el 1.? • 'S.at":,S}q .' �' i F I G '" 8;. I r, . ,•..,. ,rt•.x•as�:• {{� ___ ._ , , „ //� ' I _ t E C D I t 1 1 v• I I a / ' ' I 4 ,' , / 1 i� / I I �� It --- _.._ i DICK POITRAS , PP-121-80 (MASTRO SHORT PLAT REPLAT) t . • RICHARD W. POITRAS +1 ,14 Acres APPLICANT TOTAL AREA - s PRINCIPAL ACCESS N .F . 4th St . j EXISTING ZONING B-1 , , Business Use • EXISTING USE Undeveloped A 1 PROPOSED USE_ 3-lot commercial subdivision f r t COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial . Greenbelt • COMMENTS , 's t OF RA, U ;/ 0 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON _ - POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 •Z rn LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 9,0 co' 04 7. FD SEPle43�P January 26, 1981 TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner FROM: Lawrence J .Warren, City Attorney RE: Poitras Replat Dear Fred: • If I understand your Memo correctly, the applicant now wishes to turn the two lot short platinto a three lot short plat, If that is to be done, an entire new short plat must be prepared showing all proposed lots . Apparently this would require the applicant to include the remaining lot in the relim'nary plat. Lawrence''! Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor Council President OF R�� A O THE CITY OF RENTON •• . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ° BARBARA'. Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR .0 LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 `O FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 0 �P 94TE0 SE PI January 19, 1981 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: Poitras Replat of Previously Approved and Recorded Short Plat. The applicant originally applied for and received a two-lot short plat. The short plat has been recorded. The applicant now proposes further dividing only one of the original lots. Pursuant to the AGO 1980, No. 5 dated January 24, 1980, the applicant has filed a preliminary plat rather than another short plat. The question is, must both of the lots from the original short plat be joined in the preliminary plat or should the preliminary plat only include the lot the applicant plans on further subdividing. If the answer is in the affirmative, I would appreciate your answer as soon as possible in order to permit the applicant to include the reamining lot in the preliminary plat. OF R . 111 ®o = 0 THE CITY OF RENTON c� t ,: .. z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 �l : ire q BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT co- 235- 2550 0,9gT�D SEP' '� January 23 , 1981 Mr. Dick Poitras 201-116th Avenue N.E. Belluvue, Washington 98004 Re: Continued from January 21 , 1981 , Public Hearing: Application. for preliminary plat approval of three-lot commercial subdivision (replat of existing Mastro Short Plat, Short Plat 352-79) , file no. PP-121-80 ; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. Gentlemen: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on January 23, 1981 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for February 10, 1981 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Sincerely, fikip4e47-0-1,6e-Dt_ Roger J. BLaylock, Associate Planner RJB:yb cc : William S. Tsao & Company, P. S. 2367 Eastlake Avenue East Seattle, Washington 98102 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 25th day of February , 19 81 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn this %n "day of C e CU� � , 19 q) I . . A\1)0 V\i &la Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at v\�� f1 Application, Petition or Case: Dick Poitras; PP-121-80 (The minutes contain a V s. o f the pailtiu o ti n.econd. ) OF R.4,, �► t • <. THE CITY OF RENTON ` +• ,r�� �,�„; MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 1 . w. o : BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER -s)° `O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0,9gT�D P SEP1E�O January 19, 1981 TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner RE: Poitras Replat of Previously Approved and Recorded Short Plat. The applicant originally applied for and received a two-lot short plat. The short plat has been recorded. The applicant now proposes further dividing only one of the original lots. Pursuant to the AGO 1980, No. 5 dated January 24, 1980, the applicant has filed a preliminary plat rather than another short plat. The question is, must both of the lots from the original short plat be joined in the preliminary plat or should the preliminary plat only include the lot the applicant plans on further subdividing. If the answer is in the affirmative, I would appreciate your answer as soon as possible in order to permit the applicant to include the reamining lot in the preliminary plat. 'IX • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DICK POITRAS , PP-121-80 JANUARY 13 , 1981 PAGE FOUR 10 . The Police , Fire , and Public Works Departments have expressed concern about the access to the subject site . The act of subdivision of the existing lot into three lots increases the ultimate number of curb-cuts and the complexity of potential conflicts resulting from the development of each lot. Even though the applicant has suggested that the lots will be used for a 7-11 Store , a tire shop , and a general retail store ; the uses are not specific enough to accurately evaluate the develop- ment , interrelationships and impacts . Therefore , site plan review should be required by the Hearing Examiner. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the above analysis recommend approval of the ' replat subject to satisfaction of items L-4 through L-9 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DICK POITRAS , PP-121-80 JANUARY 13 , 1981 PAGE THREE 5 . Traffic : Until specific uses are indicated for the subject site , these impacts cannot be determined . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , the Environmental Review Committee issued a declaration of non- significance for the subject proposal on December 24, 1980 subject to ( 1 ) Dedication of additional street right-of-way ; and ( 2 ) Participation by the applicant in an L . I . D . for street widening. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Department . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and soning designations of commercial and B-1 respectively for the site and surrounding areas . 2 . The proposed uses for the subject site are compatible with the existing commercial and multiple family uses on adjacent properties . 3 . All of the proposed lots meet or exceed the minimum require- ments .of the Subdivision Ordinance for size and frontage . 4. Prior to actual development of the property , the applicant must submit an access plan for approval as per Traffic Engineering Division comment . This is required due to the new center lane planned for N . E . 4th Street (see attached memo ) . 5 . The Police Department advises that the future driveways should be wide to permit easy access during peak hours in order that the traffic flow is not slowed down by vehicles entering the parking lots . See additional comment . 6 . Proper ingress and egress for emergency equipment must be provided prior to development as noted by the Fire Department. , Also , future building construction shall meet all fire codes . 7. Standard hook-up fees for water and sewer will apply as well as a fee for latecomers ' agreement on water. See comments for amounts . 8. Assessment for future improvements required to accommodate the new development will be $20/average daily trip generated . Contact Traffic Engineering staff for details . 9 . The actual commercial development of the three lots is critical in their relationship to one another and access to N . E . 4th Street . The act of dividing the single lot increases the ultimate number of curb-cuts . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 13 , 1981 APPLICANT : DICK POITRAS FILE NUMBER: PP- 121-80 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant seeks to replat the existing Mastro Short Plat (Short Plat 352-79 ) into a three-lot commercial subdivision . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : RICHARD W . POITRAS 2 . Applicant : RICHARD W . POITRAS 3 . Location : South side of N . E . 4th Street , (Vicinity Map attached) approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N . E . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ±1 . 14 Acres 6 . Access : Via N . E . 4th Street 7. Existing Zoning : B- 1 ; Business Use 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : B-1 , Business Use ; R-3 , Resi - dential Multiple Family , minimum lot size 5 ,000 square feet ; G , General Classification Distric 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial , Greenbelt. 10 . Notification : The applicant was 'notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on December 31 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on January 2 , 1981 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2249 dated June 22 , 1966 . It was short platted into two lots through Short Plat 352-79 with approval of the Hearing Examiner on June 13 , 1979 . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site rises from west to east at slightly over a 7% slope . 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DICK POITRAS , PP-121-80 JANUARY 13 , 1981 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : Much of the natural vegetation on site has been removed with construction of the apartment complex. Some Cottonwood and Scotch Broom are present in the northerly portion fronting on N . E . 4th Street . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site (January 5 , 1981 ) . 6 . Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped with Lot #1 of the previous short plat consisting of a 224-unit apartment complex . To the west is a power transmission line and the Greenwood Cemetery . A service station is located to the north with a tavern and real estate office to the east . E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is in transition from scattered single family uses and undeveloped land to multiple family and higher uses . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: An existing 12" water main is located along N . E . 4th Street and an 8" sanitary sewer is situated on the same street . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Monroe Avenue N . E . approximately one-fourth mile west of the sub- ject site . 4 . Schools : The subject site is located within one-half mile to the south of the Honeydew Elementary School and approxi - mately one mile southeast of McKnight Junior High School and one mile south of Hazen Senior High School . 5 , Recreation : Kiwanis Park is approximately one-fourth mile to the north of the subject site and Windsor Hills Park is approximately three-quarters of a mile to the east . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-711 , B- 1 , Business Use . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 ; Short subdivisions . 2 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objectives , Pages 17- 18 . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Minor. 2. Population/Employment : Minor. 3. Schools : Not Applicable . 4 . Social : Decreased opportunities for social interaction would probably result with completion of the proposed commercial uses . SHORT PLAT 121-80 DICK POITRAS .he-i f r • • • i-. :. .' . ) r .�!E' I PAl P. v I. I NOVEMEEK 21, rAgs'.) I'.', i.'IZ. i.; • 1`jAM1:7. 01' SU7? ;yISICN I -- 1 FJrriAg' ti-k r (fwvi iir)►,RY) ,I - I -'t _ S1_ r .. T — ,I�INFI sr .j LICK FL a�- , n • A,C , TM 6 —_.. _ - - .NE __4'TH StC1� �iy y 1— 2 16 iCldf: •�.t�, •Arn21'-/ _—_ �}4-7- __--___c'!____L. --_.,_ _. w..-1,'.:._...-----•--------r'C-t> I,.,__ l BEI.kVUe',v;1. 1:1�''•j j Fes" Ji f ;I.rj7 t rr } I I O5`o; , Ile,,,u'. ) 1"-e f 1, /.,+J U Ci TNC Sfill�rlL,'1f{S? !'(5?•t? 1 _ • / t Z 2g22, N. {'bl:KFLL Av-r.- 1 I o I I ' t ."�r,I.``[M. u 1 O1 PAL LAS.'trx,k5 75264 I �� I , Hit lb,.r.SI Z • IFAG' EFK t S::t.VCYM 11 . t .• ' • 3 I bllLu,M 5.1t5so } Co.,j'�. h 5v . . -'t. y I .2367 E.ASTUKE AVE' ' t ^ - '� St7•r1tr,WA- ;9!oz c I • i AF. N• ` •I 1 9$fAi•NO'AY15 1 ! �{' o 4/ITi/rY�'r CM ;AIC.A I a t ,l 2Z I ApTOINtly Lhtlli�— i✓I 1', d. P I S1=WEh$;'Iiri: . 1! �. . I'-2 i! I • • I LIIYor a I-N 'r. . i C•rr' n I i-;L141;-.1,; I .:I" c I I! '•1it • LECAL I RIPriO� L.I , c km'a, c 'OFREM�,y 5 Ito Kr FIAT 3Sz-!9 xir coutcri, le•disl{ "F;' . og Sac•IEi123 N, R 6-E,Wt a.As . KE�r:� Irk? .1a). —— • !, ".,'.E N ri tFr _,- i1 _ ° 41 r j���'�{irI T 110.3J e4} . W d y ® 1• $ ,,f97 „, rD �"r f .w �s ' .t 'Oti: .1,141. a. .r s {r ifr r y k ?n •, '�j 1I r I �i,•. T '-' p )i1c;r `. ..... .. i I4LJJJ I---L .l of . {is. �i a 1l t • . 4 41J. I ,{ '4' 's1o�Yf[le� 1 )a I, iA�BOO ;, q 4y,1" ' k �.®. �.o.cm.®o i- ! 14 G Ct?*WO @ : lei!!! • IIILRAN .r:;y! ' •µ�st7.� v �por, ;E, c ','... !1_,v e� ll :3:-.c e7amr a 41p.0'rgD c w.ra.®.no.. .so om.eeom 1 .i jRLr •9 A, n j + I• .,, - 19 r. r a o v - d 'r ..-'t't a ° To n Nu u 1 I 0 .,, i F i ,4 pi, L __ . Y ,-til , . .. ...: 7.-- O 1 it. 5 q `"gig °kk 4n a LY 4J 0,1 4 2170 i i' • - - F it. .."Z• 1 to aI 7 1, erg' 1© {�,A 1 �j I T.t4 r. "'�: '�v_ Q ., , �- --- �V3 `"� g � .17 ;,7 �ii 4 • W w a*f "at 1Fh}1k1t 4' ^ eer. 1: !, � . � . e t A. loj I .. ooa e .4 O .Y 1s4 w 4 I 7'3 g1A I 1 i ., 1 d r;,w.,-.p., l .9.'•153.;aien@•••-i .r _- - ._L- '3` • I I ; I�a� F� i �3lT 10;.��7 1 I 1 cufr.,c + -. ,,-±an y illirirA , 'O ura nsaa perk i ® .. _ 'I } , ...„. i I . , 4, , : ° � / °Di I , _..�I' 1117::‘,. 4 _ J.,,P I � C Q L � ; I. Sr — ° �og. r ,b 1) , h 41 — ,. w — L ' ' Lti ti r . , st . ,o +re• P. .:a:...w ,, a. ,F G e 1 o I CE MET`_2Y r ' mg f } B E N - .r i ie!'r ,/['.1•// l" ... a f---- - p I r /��/ I C D I i 1 t f pp 7 V • i 1 I QQp I. / , >/ �'1 I. { JLL: DICK POITRAS , PP-121-80 (MASTRO SHORT PLAT REPLAT) APPLICANT RICHARD W, POITRAS TOTAL AREA +1 , 14 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E . 4th St . EXISTING ZONING B-1 , , Business Use EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE 3-lot commercial subdivision COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial , Greenbelt COMMENTS I~ J I'd S iC - a'0, y 1 a te/ 7;1 tts i sca G.D v®i • 0 1 ‘Vel. ‘jeD g\:>-:AkAH\Z:1%Vi4''.\ZIA • . Pet 171 ,L9 cbillgel i d ' ,rivciirj ,31Alt\I-cr.D. ... 0 4-11Ari—kt, 1g t,?ej . '\----1/1799 —61V >I 4fi -".21_ 1 ).... - 1 VI —e1 \ dr . / v N .,, ., ..,.., .., , , „,,••• 1.,4 .... 1 [4 ,..,,,I.Ci, efirl ,A, 'IkV °la , 1 1.tigri,Lirrpli'stDV— ) . 3Y,y..�..+., ,Q�r��p. , 1 ®® _ap�q,8A'.IYyi 3 4, • Di r. ' ( : 1 M �t•r,' > y57,.'' .;�- a Tr,FybYk Yp 7hkHa�g, � f S-$'i,A N i • }; p• N e..,1.”*.c .,, r + . r, 5 # � y w:. 'v4a . $ t 4yy § t3W?'� y :n' 4 y i T•5, 3 . 4 ' t r; s'p yt..i. n' iIaP • .{ *r ' t o'1pi�!ir ki .f ' ,„1 y�y1 , b,. �. •. i"14 1 W'a '�t• gk �rtl Sny 4 # ; 4 : 4.4I,' ' . : v % i ii t ;ii Y ,,, ( tt t ei.4 1 �i` �' ''4 �'' ?,i? ef ", � .' ) ' stst ,, rrki c. o 1 � �' :" ,eeF' # 4 4 ,tk! .r i S 's ,F1 'i•,,, • 4M k f*:E . !� •# ' ar `.1"fita iUf0At ; Ni / w 4� ego' � � 4"`i'"� 1'i:a� � ..411..,�.F'6.4` r'e it .r'' �:P 1, • t.44, �.f nNAt' e.MA�1 ��+'��,a •p �ia'l,� r i"�;} i ' y" ' �y'k't,".3�at' t�'1y;rt'� 'Z:iaf P':,K ld1�,: .� '.., i ,,,IT ,„ l',.l+:,t I,. x;l'3F4 ,,,,ii.'P.v,:i4 ] ,.,:' j. , "J6 4'� F.a,•'.tYr�"ts`:.7" "'>i '`,a.� .S..ry•t w''rb' • :S -1-i'':1'.`i'.' '..;]• f k ;#yq jea ;t is. .,::i:C�} v, tj�:`'' ',I,:, %rg. .i,. . , to �.,, iii.d: t;` •k kVV'�'.p.4j:4li'ta�,?��{j:�j!`+�i'+.t'i �' t,4;,.I.J LI4 @,., ' vd";;'1 �!, .. ''" .j 5ri'l•I R 1'h`,iir.P1`Ke�tP.',;;Ca• y. Y0f<)iT!`. /.'r �r t' ��:"y,_.�'.w�xdss:^.Y,iA�yrorn��;{,},},��rro�payR■,Cird:,rs„ _ `'a .1".-„?., ,:' • • tr F S fil+ ,yam ? ,Ai-L- ,,, i 4;•; ,4 Jr. 3a Y� ttA�,r.�;: U��%';`T'�t'�'SZ'±i•,. +:d� r,.it^ t r• �kA • ,Y I' pa t xty '§ ;IFF. fq .•._ - r A,,Y.., �fe.,•..,? ,�} ui 1: . ff .g ut,,44,�i�n'Va�k•,',..,.-",...'e.-,4v., 9 p h tY Cf"y 1�., rtk^' LAd. R^ i . ), Y ;{ 3 �:�F rui } #J t� +1.+ qt t- f, } w,i � L e �,lSe t t �'. 34 t 3 r PI ,''';� ,�; r^ i it',.•e w ; ¢r�] Gf`3 r d a '(Pita �y;'* '• ' o- i J. o / F fN'1Z,e" t +rip t F • r' �Cj��".tyf�-trrt • , ;-'a-5, i: �,'".}. "'4>iWr�pyj,' J ,yi. elk i�ti�',f+;ki ii % tiv>'N• � a 1 a �. ! j t ^' .r,,fire, i� a hy���ot..!`yt,' F p� i` �t•:iM;, 'R y, s`: wk,.. *1 4a ' jris;.t,lld t `/fit oaf t= a`,!t, xc`t4 '4 .�. v'i,L44':1Sxs:' .aa a0 9 e ° s f Z`�'t;fir 'et t'��y a' r' t-4),"L t.fit',4,ty�„'t.k," } ?1 1.1ki-lf ^�q,,g ?}' a': :e A,,ce � J, fi to )'i�d-,) °R ,sv,it 9 ,'r', ,. ,f 'ir"",'44 t r, $} `► 1c�tjti' K'raj;� u3• ,r�'" , ;�t � � r. a'`r .., t v �¢ r'. ,t a i i �� r} i )t ' F*irljkt.c��tt� � .+3 iti ."v %. S•L+ r• ti.c,Y, r 30 • C1S i '� "'AiS"�t {L'm1yTj �� * F q,y "l �'1� Yv'., j ' A 1 !: ,t�f # {) 4p'0.a'Y. 1$ P ,11 '. x.�'¢'4t A'}+'nr In • 't- af$+rh; ,«. 7 r �t.,,i s.y t • i).; t:�`rihti.,A, a,c,;..y€ t .1' r 11 '0 t` y7' 4 �� 4 7.,h'!•4'`s'' 45•ht., $,,. p °ta'. i�x rdE1 VP 'X ,. '{-' rr } .il AX�'ti 4t g,,,e. ,` ;' [�!,t :49 � :r.5y„1,' 1.-Q4`tYt 4+r:6»....i trs`g- '4 t` jf 5 rA411.0404 . 't h} •'V # e.g Y 1, f 7yt '',"�+ie�• lqt q '1, ia1i1f'4,�;_1 b 41 9 1'r�''♦�•"bx +r;l y. 'ff .A 'FM' ' ' '' �' , "}'' •,i . 1�j,t�'� tY' 4u`"+`` , M .• of 4 F,;;_4. . � "-, . P* SF l f t . 4.4),„, v,• � C e �I# {1 1 t '�,; rrt t ,.k t,. h 4$' gtC-e '� Se2"�+''a5',�.0 aA.f'4 �+�;e ., 7iFi til ? : • • , • 3ra a!r t• t, i4 Pi,. 7' fi• � qq 2 Esy < , k� 411m. ;, Ar,J6•�s'rt`F'}s (,�yl.,' ,� `Y' r;'��,,t�� i9 q''' : • r T 4 ,Dn 4. +..-. 't''t - ]� . tr �< »:cu:iJ y4�'^4-t». •'fix T(S a, , , tx P 'T'",, L,,,,,. <;)+' M,i�.;,,,,,, t i.f. t ' ti Z: � C� i.lt t>t Y'' ,N�' �'7., � '`, �/ # Jn,.., iCr',`� •o, t 'fir` r;`,�. t''.. s "'n.4 A41c -,lyj':14Y ']�,. k<..'��` Cr .r5 '"'k :. „�j',1]AT.> � ') .�,' ,"t�y(. A•+ .Pas.2,`Jpa#�'�4 Y ;. ,r J• d-re.C'l Q 1 +d a 1.,, t'`d"*yi�f>�t }fF '-; "{�l;5.."',{' yrt ,C7�, ��t• 6s,�•Lcar,t"T'I `'t y.' ..1 r 1/ F v'.rA t 1;i dFi as uv 'Y FT ,{•, v}}• i,,q,tt,;. 5:A.i. ,,l•,P p7, r(. } ,_$, .1 rF i'1f c 4 M,a 'vb s .k t. tf .d•.e I�F s.�{ L. 'Y a'`. Pg.% v 4:, ,.•` .' :,',Yr-1,$ �t �,.,�/,�v ��}tx,� s;7?;' s.,,t S` yt 1;�'., � �¢�•,�t�" ,�� F?Sa4 � �,.,Ay 44,'$��y,'.•!,itfj'''0.''`)sb u 'F,strN',v's�.g.,r,,t,ii �'•tt ,,/,/,kt,k,' t' '.,.,,f i "•',yi 43�q.4111:t)'t t 44,0:, ,• :k �Y,z,,�. i�, .1;5AI , ,',*�•` ^.,.h '%{,,�r:„�>„l;,t a' r�,t.,?y+�:'. - Y'�'a4`,41k) '="A,'ii'.�s��' '2;,'':!tEi• .r" y'4- c =9.3 ti�r j'i.�{`ta ' ] 'ih?'. e° k, ;t ± -04, y., 3« 1 h �:w .1(' ya, st', 1 ati `�i i' S,s } 0, e ? . , •. r 7'�': , r ' V iS4"�P°`b °t: . �. '' hS f arcs-;� 3� {4 ' ert 'eS,, �'k', n 5 t 9Yi rd => aS(�� s r tis 04,pi,4"r `E�' 4h aeMt,1 7 •A rt.i•,p .& aF V^-' ,�, ,, y;td�.. ,y,. ,. "•'�h ;�" :'4""3t `t;( = 1.`. '#, s }�'; t a :,s,•,�.• k, :, ,Y.,..L,,,'f,a r�".,T-.rY is e'k..,+r.t• m•,t 4 l , ;�,n•3Y¢:t Y ,.'. r 1 fr'4�I �A HJ'„w,�, v -•a t,it : t••'. 4,41,- `�.ti. .}�n'3 r$1'[ 'A•'fi+,,�•' �, ,0• r,f ll 4 1i :. ` ,q, 7 r,l)I l Ai P 1 Y]: jsrr,a a:y' : r. y .w6.` 3I kry d\X i] J�d„r..1s'tja C � tA,`•,�s ''a+' �" `cad" `)o '.F Ae ,''{�,:rw. .17 Sc 4f111,1;,,,t,p , . . .d P`,. ,.{ sr r.`#' :,a, t•M+,�s 't°f �;st +' a'`� $T�" '�vo<ds{!'�l;Lp' t, y 4 �;',� b.,'f,.f,�I '+:4f ,&';is�' �.T °�.•:, gip�� v�y��� � r J�,, �t S-<S4�<,i0�.tL}` 1�i,.[/�.,�• .•,', ,�t'�.i �.• �"e: .�•' `�".T`"" -- �r'+3i C � -w•t�'""�:' . IA ,v, : 'r .4 ,if'.; 4*: :RX ....;. P,"oo.F:,`j •. .fie' p r si.,a@.y ], i ,- `'gip--re,•,. ,, '. ,t,, ,1$ t. rtr".'q r m,,, . `1..'.,d�5 u„ R' `;' >b.. , df; .�S ,:: ''iaYF"i.Ws$'r y'x. ,;•,.,N. '1: Fr t j ,� ,"r'.'/i5 '' J�.'.+ ,�4;( t p•;e ''•r¢' 'Y I P 'r'Y" �' '%e EO•x(. .,(Y� � �I�. .� i, Y •. ,. /�,..A'�L.,A.' 'I f�.. �, { :a:.a;,,�,5;r�,•1 !�',r ..� am,(3dr �d''��R,:, '� ,-,e,: i.' �''%; t;_, r �tt..11.,tTii' +.,..,.y:'S].ti,a; .: -4'.1 tP . .., y'. ' '�.,'' t\ i.., :. ''l.�a,f, .,,P„w_, Sitl i t r 7•::',J` :,,y.i 1.,-., } t ,1 �'.+fIs'.� '�t1Ct;�:!'.,,. • xi' -'! 4i ,H,.eihi,(ry r,i T },.,' ,:,•k—,. tr. 4 ,E a �, 4{f 1. .` p r h 4'v • „ r' ireN•= '• 't a4 - '•'" <re'..0 1::?-:4-•,-:.:..t . , 141 " .- "-' ' r'''• 174 ::;..;;•ji.,...,iik rjr0P;:',.,,,.., .._... ,:. ,.. ., ,, is, .,3 ,Yc:;�1, • , G ,,, _.. '�' v ,(s' •i:'+ .19J 34 .:"t8?;r.:14 1 :•j'!'t•"�_y.y J(Pu14Rg .x` `,,1:, _,t:},: i...'`#''41 'v!%= c T, " a .•ii'*,{ • ;'F` n , �, F� � � +,.,F,Mw.w«...,.. 'piry 9"''Y=ti,:;,,, rx' ud h s 3N: • A^,w`*tir�' w r • .t 4-� a:-'0. "" . t 1�,kln�;'�. �r.+�m +.:1,•�`,�t�,�,;ry,;,�ry��6,�Y''y�, ,.Grr�,.�.,"!fi�41 4�a�ttR�e»f"c'°deh `�}`5 (�u�0'4��Kd .'��E"r•��4 {4;��SL�aW�.u,� "`y�j`k4T°'4i'e' t c -. ytt' yl, k ,r v,,• (#, . ,t :.:4 rmrfi f;!:''!+ 1.''ai t71 t { yf(,p„'r:, Y� 4 r 'g,t .. . v •tt is ,.A•e Ssi. ,10riJ•tjs an.1',., Tat`{.+,„ . 9 'a„,., .,: + a. n '�'$*,1 riI S 5 P., 'S:$f-1,'e: ,O.•,•,,.L' t}f.t °�1 ', ,, �s Y,y'' t . d t� i� "'' •'•t �� `+ �ItE,Yi "d`' „y t ,/,R-�$'�,J"fir"6$4k,$}'° t�".�r` 1".CYxE i. x Ph 4 i ?• i i ,, t fit' 0,,,. F ��pp+ , s `, ,„�,���s¢ ' N,71:14,t'"-�,i1,i, , l' '} `4 A ad" p t{.f l�r� ,�,' t' : �) !q.•:.�; �.3, t ]+ '{.` 'a�PVfite :>''' 1,17.�F•"{} 4. 'A'].y c .rn ,, :`�.{P '~ , i ;b' � 1'� 4, e �,, „se �', r e?c F.l: 1.: p"'C_T,',, !� .'j.'1 f6 ,:o Ito 4 of ss-`l9•'...'t 'IL.,✓' ; I 4 J, r,.y:. f'i; { , T ';�;1 4'� :21 i,��, `.,:e,.�( S:,S 35 R.. �` .. , ., iV,Atrt:., 3 �..�.�� i(4,?F�' L] i; (¢'ell*;ii '01;:;'I-;y''1' k 3' y''rii•,';;' `4�A•t4iiii'4i4S44 . ".' . 1,t;i;:t Y ,l ,,,:;;i 5.'..'"i$0 '1 tkti,t..,f»A.' ..: ,tJ.M c�.� '#'...bU'J� 999 Fl [ ,!'] i± �R t.:,. fir dti �'.19+. �.1r*,I.,r• !i.:, .,nG1` �e��.`». ''4tr"�. • . 40idif,) Plann "# 4140 12_19 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : r A re V 6 R , aga d---- 0 a . 6° e 1 AR'intyallm rg" # .. /., Applicant: :Y. al, roj7pa, TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : i i ICIf -,,I , Police Department A.R.00 MEETING DATE: tallt Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Elpqing Division utilities Engineering ___ZFire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION WIIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0u P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved ,// Approved with Conditions Not Approved T4/721,(2:- Dn/Z--- 6 P/4 257u7" , .-' Ec/e55 Foz- Z7-v fi I-ce:-47:/c-:Y ' e-e/% /(-ex--7. ,W y , 2,7 ,e ,--. ,c5/..e /4, 6-- (-1 )/i ,s 77e,7 ,7;0,k__) _.c)//7)-z_e__ /e-'7 h'GC 7/ 6-- C --S'• ,,--- C ‘ • (,)?-7-'—' (r)---\- ' /3/24 Signature of U rector or kuthorized Representative Date ( REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : trociTs( Approved v Approved with Conditions Not Approved 5148S6LT Tb ; (A) INM r_ -..-79qt-i , 0 i P--Q Fr -,z) 4i --i.9(p = 5U t DI t.z-xe 4, zr,i,,s 1 /4,-:t , 1 - tAqb-C-t C.0 Prt,A4,cL, A- C,A 6,7 o Pfl ID , ) ,12-eY L.,> -cm, 1,_, , t-_cp A`1,14,,,:, 0&-' &---- 12k4p Signa ure of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : - — Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 17/ Assessment for future improvements required to accommodate new developments will be $20.00 per average daily trip generation by the development. Trip generations are determined from ITE Standards. Condition of approval for replat of three lots will be payment of assessment when building sizes for each proposed business are known and with payment prior to actual building. 4 ' Gee. l4A. ziiia = rAC e ( �„Z- 2./z4rt/P-t."...„/ 641A/ / °3/SvSignature of Director or Authorized Re resen ot�/ve Date ......._____. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : POLICE X` XXXX Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1Should agree to participate in the improvements on N.F. 4th. 2) Area should have wide driveways to allow easy access during peak hours so the traffic flow is not slowed down by vehs . turning i `o the parking lots . Lt. D. . Persson Signature of Director or Authorized aic Represent Ve 12/1/� Date • .ter REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; 4��� e%� � �� XApproved A • coved with Conditions pbons Not Approved 7,. .---- ,..,--", .c..-",-.7 .--...". :P/ Signature o' ' rector or Autho'ri`zee^d' Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved • 'Lignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date e . MEMORANDUM • DATE: Dec. 5, 1980 TO: Planning Department j, . FROM: Traffic Engineering Division .<;, 4:. SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat PP-121-80 Condition of Approval Please require the developer to submit access plan prior to develop- ment. The reason for this is a new center lane, two-way left-turn, is planned on NE 4th Street. Access points should be coordinated with future lane installation. CEM:ad ritviLwIN6 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : - - . - Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ,v-- Signa ure of Director 3 Authorized Representative 7 /2- -2 - ,/ Date / REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ,vc Approved Approved with Conditions _XL_ Not Approved .s.....4,....„7i._- • et::: Signature or Director or Author zed Representative Date . ..M. M•• •..........•••=........... ......IV• •...m..,.. ...........••• •••••••••••••••.............M.M.M.MMI,•••••••••••••..........m........MMIMMMIn...•••••••••••••••••M.M REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ...______—......._____..................__________ •• Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved .....„... ._. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • 0 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s) : PP-121-80 Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-629-80 Description of Proposal: Request to replat existing Mastro Short Plat into a 3-lot Commercial Subdivision Proponent : Dick Poitras Location of Proposal: South side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600' west of Union Avenue N.E. Lead Agency: Planning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 18, 1980, following a presentation by Roger J. Blaylock of the Planning Department. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-629-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: Steve Munson DATED: December 4 , 1980 2) Applications : PP-121-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: 1 . Planning 2. Fire 3. Utilities Engineering 4. Traffic Engineering 5. Building 6. Engineering 7. Parks 8. Police Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43. 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: 1 . The applicant is dedicating additional street right-of-way 2. The applicant will participate in an L. I.D. for street widening. Signatures: <74, Ronald G. Nelson , 0 Gordon Y. Eri"tIcsen, Building Director Planning Director e Warren G. Gonnason Public Works Director DATE OF PUBLICATION: Dec 24 , 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: January 7 , 1981 Date circulated : f /// o Comments due : lZ fS�o ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMIST REVIEL SHEET ECF - 4©1 - ,*® APPLICATION No (s) o � °� , die MY Atr'� e a:l f t m /'F. /g® PROPONENT : a PROJECT TITLE : P ' tra e Brief Description of Project : ro ��,,� ea, .•cp .° *j e-®rt•e,,. 1015<61e 5c'A (pot Wetz I,trotS@ lei L0CATI0N : M6t-1e 00 / [®' s Are: A/ SITE AREA : 'ti./9aacv,095. BUILDING AREA (gross) , DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : • IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water, & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction :_ 9) Natural resources : • 1 ' 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employmen.t : 12 ) Number of Dwellings.: 13) Trip ends (ITE) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services: I V 15 ) Energy : . _ • 16 ) Utilities: 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI ..-JV DOS More Information Reviewed by : I 1 �� �--�___ Title : Date : ci1-} FORM: ERC-06 - Date circulated : /07. Comments due : /16 Iso ENVIRONrE ITI4E CHECKLIST REJXE1W SHEET ECF — 4e — APPLICATION No (s ) . k T Q s m abg 35",9.-79 Qs •� PROPONENT : Rkt. PROJECT TITLE : fe)9s`4ra,5. - tiksli/1ezr At- Brief Description of Project :4eroicos.ed eaA/ 14e'cl-Se ,zz-- LOCATION : ,l11 0: 5� �a' ct��fax iai - e t 00 ®_ s��_ five FVE SITE AREA : alac,.tl BUILDING AREA (gross) "— DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : ,/ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : . 3) Water & water courses : ✓ 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : r/ 12 ) Number of Dwellings : ✓ 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : ✓ 15 ) Energy : v' 16 ) Utilities : v` 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : 1/, COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI ✓ DOS More Information` Reviewed by : ��_ q/63 Title : c-70-A..r_.- Date : iZ FORM: ERC-06 ZirP F Date circulated : A40180 Comments due : ia/ / ?. G°f;�, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REEAiiEC�i SHEET 0�/ Cat 3 h E C F - 44 - „ge, (0 APPLICATION No (s) ° 7- ® 6"1 :77 PROPONENT 4 ,: !, ' ' ',2. /low; PROJECT TITLE : � Itr.,2 Ac-541,01,sty ,, r Brief Description of Project : al ,[ °cc C2- LOCATION : '_. dtSc s cgipitAfoxggia-t if 090 • SITE AREA: i'®l Qerq2,5. BUILDING AREA (gross) --- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : r/ 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : r/ 7) Light &- glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : a 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : 1/ 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities: 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI ) DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : /ZA-Z& FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : a a�� so Comments due : ✓ 'r to ENVIR HHENTAL CHECKLIST CLIST f EUTET SHEET ECF - gael Aea APPLICATION No (s ) . � � r dr ed • S or 04- BS0.o7 Y' \'• PROPONENT : e,op-a. 5 ,, PROJECT TITLE : / ,71ra A-6.41144,1ad'y . Q5 100,9 Brief Description of Project : r0 ®SAL/ ea. � � p ,;�, �; aer- 16c 5c`v ', 'e-ear 'e,,rt d4NS,9°Avo S vs, The t LOCATION : r% Sir, s 'A fen ou ®01 1 4,40,!M SITE AREA : 't(./A acre,5 BUILDING AREA (gross). DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : • IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : • 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : !! 5 ) Animal life: 6) Noise : • r� 7 ) Light & glare : !r 8) Land Use ; north : east: south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : �! 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : f 13) Trip ends (ITE) : ecniveki1ericep (SQL , b d,. u(A('�j�'-\) traffic impacts : .deft rpt !A 1001- e 3.` � a&41.4//pee r/- 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : "- 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI V DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : tit Z�LXLv Title : -rYa 7Pr`` S 2c-la1— Date : / ,/3//g v FORM: ERC-06 MEMORANDUM • . DATE:_ -Dec._5, 1980 TO: Plannin Department i ` 1h'r: �. g p (' � f':!'i'+ err /1 FROM: • ' .�, rC Traffic Engineering Division ,i.o +. - • SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat Pp-121-80 Condition of Approval \` • Please require the developer to submit access plan prior to develop- ment. The reason for this is a new center lane, two-way left-turn, is planned on NE 4th Street. Access points should be coordinated with future lane installation. CEM:ad • j d 6 • • • • Date circulated : /0744030 Comments due : /c2 /66 r 9 0 EfNVI ROU'EINAAL CHECKLIST REVIIILt SHEET E C F - gay - APPLICATION No (s) . / E(114 • "Y 1) McV14-44f 3/61's 1),'L40110 PROPONENT : IC/. ��t'Ara._5 PROJECT TITLE : /Mra,5 Yd Brief Description of Project : ro Pep •ee S� 3 1)( __ Sc-ve,'icf'-ero° a (16g15a���5' 9 ite iltr-op6, 7cl L O C A T I O N :4/ r o("Se keit$a' s®,4 Pme-1 69 e ' Avg Adl • SITE AREA : -t/./e/ c2Cre,5 BUILDING AREA (gross) '— DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (96) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : x 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : ¢ s 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : Xi I 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts :_ 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : • X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human health : X 18) Aesthetics : r ,� 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NSI DOS More Informalign� (-) ti � Reviewed by : /� :� 4 %'�`o�, Title : /.V ( 4', a 4 - _ Date : /r FORM: ERC-06 Date circulat _ : /ol!i/8o Comments due : /02 46l 94) ENVIRONMENTAL CHEEUSLYST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 6a/ m .141 APPLICATION N o(s) o /9R6Cl7M! ,•:Y ief Ae -� I ict'$ ' s - i' ' : 5 0e IA. 3Sa-7 ) C a rev O) PROPONENT : 11/ c ra 5 PROJECT TITLE :/ ,71ra / .4fl/naLr /3t Brief Description of Project : o a.l P¢,, � •ec��� ye- // _` � f v j1L, ry air /dc Sc-rvice-dra'�-c3�,(�vSinos5'f 2s+ rar!'.l LOCATION : — . Se, s .elt to -male 00 , a Ave1 SITE AREA: (./YQris+ BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (? ) : ' IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : ✓ 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : v/ 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : ,/ 5 ) Animal life: 6) Noise: ✓ . 7) Light & glare :_ 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction: 9) Natural resources : 10) Risk of upset: ✓ 11 ) Population/Employment : , ✓ I, 12 ) Number of Dwellings : / 13) Trip ends (ITE) traffic impacts: 14) Public services : �. I ✓ 15 ) Energy : / 16 ) Utilities: / 0 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : � 19 ) Recreation : I , 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation: S DOS More Information Reviewed - l itie : LL ►e) mow, SAP Date : 1 Co FORM: ERC-06 Date circulated : /ct/f/90 Comments due : I a /f61 go ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE`, SHEET E C F - 6(39 - *D APPLICATION No(s) . PRF ® T 0 da S P 91I45' : 5tov 614- BS-a-7 cab •® PROPONENT : /Q %7 ,e,e4-,2. 5 PROJECT TITLE : &Iraq r '// /F1 et r Rai- Brief Y Description of Project : ro c "�� �fg-� •ecy �e c7,- in or e 4ca-7 S�'rasA.e-®ra'e..-s ey5iore.$.5IPA 00i liAe pry 3CIrl.g LOCATION : ,0W7 1.65;4 sr.9c{.afroaMud+ 100 ' ft%,;0,,i v'M SITE AREA : t I ft/ acr ,$ BUILDING AREA (gross) a DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : f 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : ,/ 3) Water & water courses : • 4) Plant life : 5) Animal life: v� 6) Noise; ,` 7) Light & glare : 9) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : /7 y 9) Natural resources : 4 V/ 10 ) Risk of upset : V/ 11 ) Population/Employment : / vailawsnalampl 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health: ,/ 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation: 1/ 20) Archeology/history : V COMMENTS : Recommendation : -iZ / DOS More Information___-- I Reviewed by : f (/ ,--1--- ,-x-•- — T i t le : 77, 'l �iL S.9- Date : l G FORM: ERC-06 /6 Date circulated : /c 1/ /90 Comments due : /2f /90 ENVIIRO J"ENTAE CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - pE - '0 APPLICATION No (s ) At://°/7,/ /4AV A-4T(4 k7iet4 /451s) , Azt- AlQ : 5ho -7"R../- .Y -79re, afir®) PROPONENT : eG4/, rbelera. PROJECT TITLE : 4,51 -.r5 /9e//ef;oa7 r Brief Description of Project : Reloessaf 1i �a.lSe4jcstc74.Sr ere e /i:9Cam-/ ervice --6mete'I2D5�sY4P-415(17, en 71Ae propez6'/C/ LOCATION : C/°c 1. �i o v fri 3e a1J ,y coFa Ids ‘eGG�P-sev(�irlie5/+41iP L- SITE AREA : i/ Veezereo BUILDING AREA (gross )/ ----- DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6 ) Noise : 7 ) Light &glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : Scprv/ee 6.-48-"(ior: east : R a_I teie@ ' 1czVC" " south : Apa ri`m C�►�.s ga �� west : aa.,(Tor rootTiafr' s,,►;p4 ree ' 4'*6reenw6eciCeme4-er Land use conflicts : r0"! View obstruction : Po 551-114 SorraIC,.. Gt- di rile*04.S. Scsksill 9) Natural resources : �. 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( I T E ) : a eia aafa,'(44:, r inlet pf f F'S6'0114416'S traffic impacts : 'r 14 ) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : • YRs� •.9�G v�s w%1 E 60 v it:"`l sL-41# 7 04.S gleilly 60 6r J�6^64e1"a. t) '�R c fm e,k`F ,ate p( . ‹.¢.1 10 de- e .t'de 1-& the s e co vid�� s 411 �.En"�'dutto iii f 4r e•►y(�eicy lAj- . proeiteopts fleece:2 w{(km_ uQ r� Q�e.AA.`f fo 144. eas( • Recommendation : DNSIITC DOS More Information Reviewed by : 6$eve Ixt ucksa Title : A$w5"tajff-Pletleiet-- Date : 4-5° !'eer i o m i s3 et i On 0 ijetrns p?.©P'� cd ofre FORM: ERC-06 cl Date circulated : /////9Q Comments due : / N/90 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - ga9 - Re, APPLICATION No (s ) . /REd/5/A IQy�Ps ( , t a -�'3/p fs)�� PROPONENT : F ' !� P �.y{Q g Gl/. Po e ter4 PROJECT TITLE : &IVras / - ?//nhinezr Y Brief Description of Project : 4/451 in D„-er /,c 5,—vvic�-ors' ��Ss'Kes5ps ®r itte pr-00 ly LOCATION : c 4' ' 'i as IA sleet)alf fox iora-7/lr gO0 'igo of ation live A/F �� / SITE AREA : t!•/9acrd_5 BUILDING AREA (gross) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : _ 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : I 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services: 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities: 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI ,=f1- DOS More Information Reviewed by : % 1 / . Title : Date : ) /'. • FORM: ERC-06 OF IR4, . THE CITY OF RENTON itoav MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,0 <0' 235- 2550 O9�TF0 SEPT ��4P December 24, 1980 Dick Poitras 201-116th Avenue N.E. Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR Application for preliminary plat approval of 3-lot commercial subdivision (replat of existing Mastro Short Plat, #352-79) ; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. Dear Mr. Poitras: The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on November 25, 1980. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for January 13, 1981 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Rog r . Blay ock, Asso to Planner cc: William S. Tsao & Co. , P. S. 2367 Eastlake Avenue East Seattle, WA 98102 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 13 , 1981, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. POITRAS PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT, DICK POITRAS) Application for preliminary plat approval of three-lot commercial subdivision (replat of existing Mastro Short Plat, Short Plat 352-79) ; File No. PP-121-80; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. 2. JOHN AND FRANK VIDMAR (VIDMAR SHORT PLAT) Application for 3-lot short plat for future single family residential development; File No. Short Plat #128-80; and Exception to the Subdivision Ordinance for a pipestem lot on proposed Lot #2; File No. E-130-80; property located vicinity of 502-508 Renton Avenue South Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 13, 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: December 31, 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, ROGER J. BLAYLOCK, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 24th Day of December, 1980. T1 I JjJ X Signed: 1 I Rog rIJ. Bl ylock,u, sociate Planner , - ,..,0",, ;t1, , ;* ..1, tl, , 1.0'"" ,-, .?,5 '04,,I e• ,,e,i: :-';'i& ,t t 1 4; I ,„ .. „. ,, ,, ,,,. . ,„ , . , , ,„ : 4 i. me , .f^4 '4f ; GENERAL LOCATION: A' viii ,./---- ADDRESS: i 1 PRQPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. ,4TH STREET APPROXIMATELY I, 60U FEET WEST OF UNION AVENUE N.E, , .i LEGAL DESCRIPTION.• , k A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON t' t, PLANNING DEPARTMENT , 1), ; 1 l' • *WNE IS POSTED TO NOTIFY PR*PERTY RS OF i' . ., , , , . .. .... ,_ ' , .', ,, ,,, - 110". ' '', m ; ',, ., ,, ith .11', t 4 '','....,' , , I , v. 41 ' ' ,, I ,t'' 'lliir ,:'' .* ,, 1 0 ) .-, ' ':' ,: -' , ''',v. : k, ..' P' -• ' 4' 1' .4 40..7,*'..,41 1„ ' 3* Ti' 4.E HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MW-ICIPAL BUILDING ON JANUARY 13, 1981 t'EGINNING AT 9:00 . AM. P.M. i . • ,,,,, -, E t 11. ‘'I e • , * If *v.,"4 0 ' . ' 0 • ,... . x, U. ;V t ,Iliai'' Aii 7oi, if ' • w- 4 1 , ' 4, 1 4 lb% 1 • ,4, ) 1 ?„. 4,4 ,AP ,. '"'4. 4',' Pr ,r4 ,44' 4, ;0 ,.., lb' ': .4 ' n'''' A- i',:, ,,A,, t. s, ' , ' ,. ,, t, 4, 4.,,,,, 4,, ');14 `--4 , if 4 POITRAS PRELIMINARY PLig) FILE NO. PP-121-80: 4PPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY FEAT ?PROVAIn OF -3-LOT-COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION (REPLAT OF EXISTING EASTRO SHORT LAT) P352-79) . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 This NOTICE NOT TO T BE REVt* wni ooui PROPER AU , .0,ok.l. IZATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . POITRAS" PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT (ECF-629-80) • Application fro preliminary plat approval of three- lot commercial subdivision (replat of existing Mastro Short Plat, Short Plat 352-79) , file PP-121-80; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. 2. L. I.D. NO. 314 (ECF-633-80) Proposed roadway improvements (widening curbs and gutters installation, storm drainage to East Valley Road) ; property located on East Valley Road - S.W. 16th Street, S.W. 19th Street and S.W. 27th Street The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has further issued a proposed declaration of non-significance for the following project: 3. DAVE BEST (ECF-634-80) NTT-ITC-Mon for rezone from "G" to R-3, file R-125-80, to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1 ,000 feet south of S.W. 43rd Street Subject to the following conditions for proposed declaration of non-significance: 1 . Mitigation of impacts on existing and potential land uses of adjacent properties as a result of the piecemeal development of the general area instead of a systematic program of development. 2. Mitigation of traffic impacts resulting from the development of the potential project' s maximum of 260 dwelling units upon the general vicinity, which is to include a mile radius. This is to specifically include mitigating measures for the impacts resulting from the construction of a northern access road linking the subject site with S.W. 43rd Street. 3. Mitigation of both on-site and off-site recrea- tional impacts resulting from the potential development of the subject site. Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by January 7, 1981 . Published: December 24 , 1980 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: 1 . POITRAS' PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT (ECF-629-80) Application for preliminary plat approval of three- lot commercial subdivision (repldt of existing Mastro Short Plat , Short Plat 352-79) , file PP-121-80; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. 2. L. I.D. NO. 314 (ECF-633-80). Proposed roadway improvements (widening curbs and gutters installation, storm drainage to East Valley Road) ; property located on East Valley Road - S.W. 16th Street, S.W. 19th Street and S.W. 27th Street 3. DAVE BEST (ECF-634-80) Application for rezone from G to R-3, file R-125-80, to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings ; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1 ,000 feet south of S.W. 43rd Street Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by January 7 , 1981 . Published: December 24, 1980 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A G END A DECEMBER 17, 1980 COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING ITEMS: JAMES BANKER (ECF-623-80, SP-111-80) SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION ("THE 650 BUILDING" ) (ECF-636-80, SA-126-80) MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. (ECF-567-80, SP-047-80) VALLEY OFFICE PARK, PARK II (ECF-602-80, SA-092-80) NEW BUSINESS: ECF-634-80 DAVE BEST R-125-80 Application for rezone from G to R-3 to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1 ,000 feet south of S.W. 43rd Street ECF-629-80 POITRAS' PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT) PP-121-80 Application for preliminary plat approval of three-lot commercial subdivision (replat of existing Mastro Short Plat , Short Plat 352-79) ; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N. E. . / /6 Date circulated : ,F 2/, / O Comments due : /c//90 EMIVIROW,ENIfAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - Q - 0e9 APPLICATION No (s ) . 4/, � ,4 �, k etc 3 hats .7/_8o ca : 6640,-ylCV4i7- -75*-a-79 ate® PROPONENT : Rr , P,'??''a-a PROJECT TITLE : 41/ra45 a 4floid27 e— Brief Description of Project : Are set/116 perh-1,ti4j d:Sli j :r -14, es3-71 sse r —cs ry 1e d9 4505,E PreS tr. 4/7 7 e pra,ea LOCATION : 1/ / i� 6.40 S,eid Ore,r;MaSeb (4e - el.�w,��lObt;4/4 SITE AREA : d. / 9�zereo BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) • Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7 ) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north : S"•QrNre,© S70. 21-1.4,a-, east : hr,&4_1 teecca 1ccvVcv.rrv� south : west : ,Ow,.wir-Ti'caNgoairestF:fil 6W .5''6 ree Wei 0CI eettle lie 0' Land use conflicts : View obstruction : c s t-hig/Sputa oa ,b- (Mit edao.ecnit.S. 9 ) Natural resources : b„,„ 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 11 . I 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : NQ X aueL �iate? Ile,e eves'wafer, traffic impacts : 14 ) Public services : I �/ 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : pp--� f� � , ,/� ®J �Gar�ry.a..ups 8 64CArakt,P: e" is e S©U 60 lei-`�"'/ es!S¢a.w.�4v i -e. ifii%2 3 e co 00&Q s,• ae�� 1�-d�e- � omit �a►d l e r e cr'r-cr✓1� •O i ro4J etvis 4cf& . e i/r at /TLitedv%acelfac.e!/a1 10 The. eetsl . Recommendation : DNSIL� DOS More Information Reviewed by : j'hevQOUr�Sov�D a t e : O ,+ -jv j 6' 40 RI i+1:1 0 et 8 a 5 f a71ela.10e/e FORM: ERC-06 J CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. .14a i4/-1 11 MAJOR PLAT DATE REC'D. /4'25440 TENTATIVE APPLICATION FEE $ x PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL FINAL REVIEW FEE $ RECEIPT NO. SM NO. PUD NO. • APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7: 1. Plat Name & Location Poitras' Plat AooroxirpatpLy Rhn fPe _West of N E 4th St & Union Ave N E Intersection along N F 4th st 2 . No. Lots 3 Total Acreage 1 . 14 Zoning B-1 3 . Owner Dick Poitras Phone 451-0209 Address 201 116th Ave. N.E. Bellevue. Washinaton 98004 5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed Telephone ( x ) ( ) ( ) Electric ( x ) ( ) ( ) Street Lights ( x ) ( ) ( ) Natural Gas ( x ) ( ) ( ) TV Cable ( ) ( x ) ( ) 6 . Sanitation & Water: ( x ) City Water ( x ) Sanitary Sewers ( ) Water District No. ( . ) Dry Sewers - ( ) Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY_ FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION: TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED APPEALED EXPIRED 10 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL -ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : DATE DATE BOND NO. AND TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . Rev. 1/77 ® r ,9 • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. fi°'✓.v--fd Environmental Checklist No. •-.L7 9-ii PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: , • ® Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance . H. ® Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance . COMMENTS: • - i .i • • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their• own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the .quality of the• environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your 'answer's' are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government .decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. . • The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is: sought. • Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal ' when, it is . completed, even though completion .may, not occur until sometime in the future.: This will: allow all i of the agencies which will . be involved .to complete their;'e�nvironmental'. review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. , • NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and:.local : agencies in,'theState •• . - , of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of th'e;;ques.tions, may not. apply to.' . •, your proposal . If a question does not apply,. just answer.:,It ;.. no• ,land� continue' on. to the next question. '.''� • . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST, FORM;;, ''' '.' ' " - ' '�'I ' I. BACKGROUND • ;,H ;:. . r William S. Tsao ; ; 1. Name of Proponent & Co. P,S 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 2367 Eastlake Avenue East. Seattle, Washington 98102 : •324-8780 ' . 3. Date Checklist submitted November. 21 , '1980' ' . 4. Agency requiring Checklist City ofRenton, Planning ' 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: . • Po i tras' Plat 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The proposal is a commercial subdivision, consisting of 3 lots, Each lot contains approximately 16,000 Sq. Ft. ___ The total acreage of the subdivision is 1 . 14 acre, The type of services which will be available to the public will be a • convenience store, tire shop, and several other service oriented businesses. . -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The North property line is abutting the southerly R,'W line of the N.E. 4th St. in City of Renton. The East property line is approximately 650 feet West of the intersection of N.E. 4th St. and Union Ave. N.E. Fourth Ave. N.E. is currently travelled by motor vehicles. . 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : • • Fall.of 1981 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal` • (federal , state and local--including rezones) : • approved formal subdivision utility permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity . related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No. 11. Do. you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No. • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See attached application for preliminary subdivision. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS . (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) . (1) . Earth. Will the proposal result in: - (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x TES 171017 Fir (b) Disruptions , displacements, compaction or over- covering Of the- soil? YES ' MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x TEs MAYBE NO • (d) . The destruction, covering or modification of any • unique geologic or physical features? YES MIT NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils . ..- , either on or off the site? x YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or ,any bay, inlet or lake? , x 5777 WATTE. N� Explanation: (B) Minor excavation may be required if existLng utilities is required to be extended to the subdivision and for building foundations. (E) During the construction of utilities, if any, and later the buildings and service connections the exposed soils would be susceptible to erosion. -3_ /` (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air �� f ` quality? YES AP AYBE ' NO • (b) the' creation of objectionable odors? • x YES NO . (c) Alteration 'af air movement, moisture or temperature, ' or any ,change in climate , either locally or ' regionally.? "' x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (A&B) Machinary•that is required for arty exc"avarinn, if . necessary, will deterirate the surrounding air quality. This deterioratton will be negligable. . • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: . ' (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh;'waters?( x . : YES MAYBE NO,; , (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or . I the. rate and amount of surface water runoff? ''' , .' . X - ""1•'', '! .r; ' ' . ,:; lii YES' • MAYBE .:.'N0. ('c) Alterations to the course or flow of fla'od,:'waters? `` '" x ,i,,,,. i �Y.ES: MAYBE! NO . (d) Change in the amount of surface water i.n "any�.,water:a' h.-,1, :1 body? ' f ;x. ' (e) Discharge into surfac• e waters , or in any al'terati•on ;; '` "' :,,-i'.. surface water quality, including but note;l:imi ted to•1i'"1,.'i'''; ,''' '•i;', ',,YI ' '',.'•'''',..'. ;t temperatures, (dissolved oxygenor turbidity?'', .;1:,'11 ;,:I,j, ,:il .' "' •-� i: { 4 '.1 �R t"I'1!.j''.<!:>;, . ,,i1:.!rl•,'• BYES" 11Nri .1;11 ,: '•'� ,• 4 I •in :Fn" • i' 'i i .i ,,,,` t"r,•i' :ir ,IFp'i I '., '',. t .I , ,I .d'; � I•7 'i• ,'" .'P'[ a,! ;id,..a'''i.ifl •, ili+r •�i. i�1 1• .I' •i. • •'j� • I ;i,,,,,f'' ' (f) Alteration 1of the direction or rate of '',flow;'o,f,:y �",;,, 11 . ground waters? , ' .. . , . i.: ;, ,.,a:,:�l':f'J:.J•;!;,,n!;: .}I'. `.,` 'I:•! `sL<_ ",, '!,,, i1;,, I'' ' ' ''1' ` 1'''' ,711 ;:; ,MA BE';:,,'NO .r ! 1 ;1 "• „ . • "' 'lr '!',.I:.':•;1 ,'' •',, it 'il., ill'. I 1• .r Change, q Y Ili e j',`,...t''!°,�,i 'i,i q; .i;. ;1? (g) in he uantit of ground waters'':Te'it,her; `, 'ff!'•• '` ' J ,"!, through direct additions or.withdrawals',.., 'or;l, through ,,I ^.y:1� • `: , r, (' i nterception •of an aquifer b'y,'cuts or':excav'at ons?,.�I'' `",i xa^•'!'•.., ' .'''•','.!I ;•I ""'i': ,; a!1,' j' °;; p h, ,i, (h) Deterioration' in ground water.'"quality, ,.e,ither; -!throughl, ' 'C_ . '"7'i' 'if.i: •1':''' �' I ,, � ,!ICI,' �� I"�' � � ; i i • direct injection, or through the. seepage of'.l:eachate; ! •I r ' phosphates,' detergents, waterborne virus orr,' bacteria;,: ••'; -. i.i;Hi ;,; . '',•''•'' or other, substances into the: 'ground waters.. 1 ' '' ' < !.(YES .',j, MMAYB.E. N0. 'i'l (i ) Reduction in', the amount of water otherwise, available l' ' r• • for public water supplies?• :i 1! x 1 MA BE ' NO Explanation: (B & G) Driveways, parking lots and buildirigs' will virtually , cover the 'entire site. Thereby decreasing the arnount'of water "'' •.: ':`• infiltrating"to the aquifer. ' " •(4) . Flora. Will, the, proposal result in. ;; • (a) Change in the diversity of species, or 'numbers-'of any''.. . " ; " ' . • species of .flora (including trees, shrubs, g.rass , crops. . • microflora: and aquatic plants)? x• ' ' YE ,, MAYBE ' 'NO 1 (b) Reduction of the numbers of, any unique,. rare.-or'. .1 1';*. • . endangered:"speci es of flora?' . I M- '.I ' '' 'x ESMAYBE .,NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into. an area., 'or ' '" • , in a barrier to the normal replenishment.of;existing . species? ES MAYBE" .•NO • • • (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x EYES MAYBE NO • Explanation: The existing vegetation is limited to pasture grass arid several small Alder trees. This vegetation.will be •cleared. Landscaping may be required for this subdivision. -4- (5) Fauna'. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including- reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? x YES WIT NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? x YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? x YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The commercial businesses which are planned may attract additional traffic over and above what is currently existing. (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x DES MAYBE Mr Explanation: Same as 6. • • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x -YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The construction of the proposed improvements will . • cause a small depletion of natural resources and nonrenewable resources. • (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO J ' Explanation: - (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YE'r- MAYBE NO Explanation: -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or , create a 'demand for additional housing? x ' , ! • YES MAYBE 'NO • ' /,• Explanation:, ' r • (13). . Transportati'on/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Generation of additional:'vehicular movement?„ r:• ` • • x • YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects 'on existing parking. facilities', 'or•demand• • ' , for new parking? 3 . x YES MAYBE - NO • (c) Impact'' upon "existing_ transportation systems? • ° -, ;. '.,r,'' x-,`, . . .. :;.' :I YES ,MAYBE." •NO ' (id5 Alterationsi• to present patterns, of circulation'i or' • ' ', . •, ,. i ' movement ,of 'peop.le and/or goads?' ,., „i,1,. '; ; •,.. .- j!.-!':::,,.1,',,;'•,J,:,,x.I,' 'i. .,;. • • ;.''ij,;,'V I;MAYBE•°,,NO, „I''.,.,' (e-) Al te•rati,ons•',to•waterborne,,, rai 1 or air traff'•i'c?, '' x .,' - I }'3hY,;,,.1' TF`,„•,,1,t:,;'r: ''I,,:';,.�..11':i•"." ;;; 'T .T' ' (f.) Increase '.i'n� traffic hazards• to motor vehil:es''", ,;` 1"A. ,T.:.'`v,µ "11 "'^.``-'''" ;1: r bicycli'sts•-•or-`pedestrians'? �' 'r;-!'.f;i,,t.,,;;;i, ,,-i•'.!,;; ,pr'4X.:'C3.;,s t`.}.i •,l'.t-:,},F':.;N' ,±:i ,.• .h 11,I ,, iy.Il;li., • ± I.i 'I,E!il ,..4,, ,;:,TiU±'4 ' j'F,-,:i0,-,z,:j,'I:.;�,`:YESli.. :„gM _::;:nilO - '., :I '•f,i,lj.,: �(' - - z'K� p., .,}:�d7i I. '� .,Lr•.i;l I:•'. .',1.';I,',1`t* _I,,'< zl ..):,. 1 1 „ ,•/ _ '..11gq 'i'. ,,.:�.;.41,i'01!l L ',a' `'Reit',,.ilif":;:;:'j'"'.\ ,,,14z* .in,i'• ,I,, 'i t'l.::", 'j (:r. "' r! 1'1,. lji h±•. .��,I, '<.i.p.a4,• ao "!.r,.:, , I tsa.. f`: ' :Exf l anati on': A -& •The' ro osed commer l ti- 'v'Ii"li? "'j p ( � p p otaL`�bus�nes'ses;'w�lt�cre'ate'�:�c'-1''.,i+'. I'' ,I` •.,zt '1, , 'I i�,,,(,I;'"1E•':r. :.�', il,,, i' 7";_, iT,t,,, 1�1:rY.'.l;a ;�' !''; additional tannin traffic which will caul 'e,'ad q s d i tionah traffreb^1',1:11;.•! , 1,. I. •t��, o.l• :; LJ;,e,' 1- +.'�.,iV•;i. }r,'^' N;�'" ''`,:>���k'+� 9' �'i;i :p:' , �(��'i. .... 1 -.;�; ; 't', - ;„-• P' �L'!1.q, .'ii;;i1 i",:'"( rY I;�9� �"3� r, L �; 'f.. '`.::: ". - .a '; • i'' '. , -• ,,• I �. L�I 4.I L., ;1`r'iil`• k^lrr,w f ��'�,.•� I ..,,, �. S ;!'The°devel0 m2 t f`' �, ;, ,: ,l hazard n will re u�r,.,' t';nevvi'` ark 5 r' "" ''' ' a:' -''C )i P � q p ,,_ i'r,g ,a".,eas.,: .tl_: I' ,'••' i' .. • ', .: ,. ,:'''1'' :'Pin" t." -.'Spii ',Ar '1°F'r"„., ✓;rvr,,.;7i . },;','��`H`: , .'.. a,j ',,, ,I'„ � '"d` -. - _. ,li ',4•i'� _ I�rt r_lr,I1" F ,.•j.;ss:,:ii. 4.u..'C�'�f-'.„ i..A.�1i,jn 'i:.� .i�' 'L. - I.: �',i' :.,±il, :. l:II:;, . . ."r' Ik'r'�''';P'' ,+,�> �i±i:t$re :>u•".:;!(';'. ''' r, .` ' ff ' ' :� ,'V ;1,.I ;�i � i„" '1Q 'if' ,.fi��!`' I', fi s'6', ' I;. t ,.. li';1.. 't' t'� - y.If 11�;.,..,tj,..��,...,-1',`'.'� i. r ,I...l!,...: � I. 14 Public Services ':Wi l'1 the' proposal'' have 'an .ef,fectj upon' ;ori, - ti '.i,. u 'j .result i.n4 a '.need::fori:,new .or.i;al,tered°'governmen`tal`'serv,ices'',` ,,;': ;i, • ' • ;in any of 'ithe following areas . • ' ':IL !. ijp ., -1.,, ' .-.. 4 ,i: j ..V ' , 'fl i.'Ii i ...^,'t, '•Y,�•4L.1 ,'li,,! '( t i' ;n� 'L 1;1'i,''1 '' .! j'4, (a) Fire' protection?' ' I:;:i' : . iy>,' •'.' + . i?''`I' ,1:'. ' i,: I YEsr,, MAYBE'"`"I,N�,, ; " ;r r,. .(.b)' Police' protection? _ ,i;fr',, II- i' :,'j;. :x; ,:', :r, ';•�. ' pr' - - '.i'' ;; •;. ,i 'IYES � ",r:MAYBE , 'NO (c) - Schools? ' „ YES MAYBE' • NO ' ' (d,)• Parks Or .other recreational facilities?. • ! "; . x - YES M .YBE. .NO (e) Maintenance .of public facilities, including, roads?'' YES MAYBE : NO ' j .i,, (f) Other governmental services?'" '' ' x ! • i H•.?„ ' . ,YES. MAYBE" NO.; ' I` Explanation The planned businesses will require"both police!and fire pro.. - ' ' -tection services. ?Other services may'''be required.dependinq on;the'"types '- of businesses which have not been determined at this writinq,' ''' j` ' ' :;r. u'I: , (15) Energy. Will the',proposal result'•i'n. ' . ' I 'k.:•';' ' " , • ' ' ' (a) Use of, substantial amounts ofi fuel or energy? ',,, •l'L ' '..,. -.'r.;; .1 ;x � :ri: . NO ;!, . . it , . I' YES MAY.BE''''t, :,jrI ; „ ''' (b) Demand upon existing sources, of ener.gy,. or,''.require-1 , V .i` the development.of, new source's of energy? • YES M TApB ' Nam:' Explanation:. `,'Additional demand will be placed on both electrical • ' . ,f - and gas energy for lighting and heating of the buildings. • k • - (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for-. new • ' systems, .or alterations to the following utilities: . ' , • (a) Power or, natural gas? x YES- MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? x YES MAYBE NO - • - (c) Water? x • YES MAYBE NO • -6- = . (d) Sewer or septic tanks? 'x YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? x YES MAYBE Fir (f) Solid waste and disposal? x • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ( A through E) Service connections will be required. Solid waste disposal will be required after the occupancy of the proposed commercial buildings. (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE Mr Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction o.f any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the ' proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x YES 'MAYBE NO Explanation: There are those who feel buildings in general' are aesthetically offensive. • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? , x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeologicalf Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? x • YES um-- NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (signed) • George F. Runnels (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 AFFIDAVIT I, -Richard W. Poitras - , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 24th3ay of November , 19 80 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle /1&,, 2i,„/".„4„/ (Name of Notary Public) I&�elene Schlossberg (Signature of Owner) Seattle 3 G 3 / U i 12 e , S (Address) (Address) gELL-Evac- t-vols�� (City) (State) (Te leplonej (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANUARY 13 , 1981, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. POITRAS PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT, DICK POITRAS) Application for preliminary plat approval of three-lot commercial subdivision (replat of existing Mastro Short Plat, Short Plat 352-79) ; File No. PP-121-80; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. 2. JOHN AND FRANK VIDMAR (VIDMAR SHORT PLAT) Application for 3-lot short plat for future single family residential development; File No. Short Plat #128-80; and Exception to the Subdivision Ordinance for a pipestem lot on proposed Lot #2; File No. E-130-80; property located vicinity of 502-508 Renton Avenue South Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITION ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 13, 1981 , AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: December 31, 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, ROGER J. BLAYLOCK, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 24th Day of December, 1980. 1� . 1 ll�X ,� Signed: ^, 1 .+... Alk Rog r !J. Bl ylock, t sociate Planner . .,.4:1040to-45; if.. Alt.*:. _ . ., -4 J„,,w, , ,I, , ,, , -0 .^ 4 'If =Y '' ., $',''A •;,: 41/1 ..,,,, .. r , e,:'',-'. lit''''' 'r .'. '' ::.';,..""r'' rT'i'''14' ' ','I',f i'N',:'':'7 :;r‘,, ' 4 • '; , c, !,efrs,''1'4' .,-Al. ,-;'' .t ,,,4, , a 1 r. ' l',, '!I 4•,' ..: . 11',t ' r,,,..r:',, ..,, . 1 ,." ..• • , i .,.. .-... - ,..., ,.. . . t. fit 'r 1% 4' t 1 t',.. 2 1 t •.,,- i:: 'k ;T.;,,,, ..v.,. .„ Is 1:,,II 'olt IIIi GENERAL LOCATION: AND ;-0,7'''' ADDRESS: g . ( PRQPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF N.E. ,4TH STREET APPROXIMATELY f 60u FEET WEST OF UNION AVENUE N.E. l' ,r t LEGAL DESCRIPTION: f " 0 DETAILEp LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON LANNING DEPARTMENT tt 0 , , , IS POSTED T-.0) NOTIFY P;--- if .-'ERTY # T-NE'-' S OF ii ,, 7, ,, , 1‘f' , i . L ,-..,,V..,,t•,.,,.L ,"..,' ...". , til.' i 4 4".' ....' • ' ,,' '' rV TO ';:pE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING • . . ON JANUARY 13., 1981 EGINNING AT .....3.11/Q _A.M. PM. ' C , 4 C 0 Nc EiN .:,.,,, I TE: ;" '11, ' EZ0 ; , ' . 11 , -v- - 'Cr ' "Ir -5 1 V ''„ l ,...' . ''' '', Ej '.D'' ' ; : 1 . .,,. , " i',.. , ,i, , , '., te , 's`•••• "4, : ''' I .4 ti 0111 I, ,111, ,;10', ;:eez ,f frAt IN , MI ii- : .,., -1i4 . ' A ' " r 4 ..... `',.. e. ^'t- r, ' r • . Pr '" /= s.' .3 " r• '4 e.‘r 4;a ., ' .. ' 14 t '' ' ,, , +1" ' ,,4'r '„' ,11 l''1, 4 `141 ; ,0„ , , , , i, ,'"' „ 1. ;,5; 1:, N ", . v.." .1,4 `ir i '', f ' ' ', t. . ;b ,. ., . „ , - ,,. ' .-{4,4 t ..'5( • i ' 1 ' ,. , 0 , , , , 0 . . ,,,/.„IT ,. „, .., . . , ,,, POITRAS PRELIMINARY PLIeg, FILE NO, rr-44.1..—80: 4PPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY VtAT PROVAL OF—)—LOT-COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION (REPLAT OF EXISTING MASTRO SHORT LAT, #352- 9) . F*--* FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 236 250 MS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVi't WITHOUT -'0PER AUT, (4-ilZATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of. non-significance for the following projects : 1 . Pa IJDA I'M' N►A'°4z a' ( E O ,ir tiMMUO 1 • Application fro preliminary plat approval of three- lot commercial subdivision (replat of existing Mastro Short Plat, Short Plat 352-79) , -W ] - 4,a 91- no ;.. property .located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. 2. L. I.D. NO. 314 (ECF-633-80) Proposed roadway improvements (widOning curbs and gutters installation, storm drainage to East Valley Road) ; property located on East Valley Road - S.W. 16th' Street, S.W. 19th Street and S.W. 27th Street The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has further issued a proposed declaration of non-significance for the following project: 3. DAVE BEST (ECF-634-80) Application for rezone from "G" to R-3, file R-125-80, to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings ; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1 , 000 feet south of S.W. 43rd Street Subject to the following conditions for proposed declaration of non-significance: 1 . Mitigation of impacts on existing and potential land uses of adjacent properties as a result of the piecemeal development of the general area instead of a systematic program of development. 2. Mitigation of traffic impacts resulting from the development of the potential project' s maximum of 260 dwelling units upon the general vicinity, which is to include a mile radius. This is to specifically include mitigating measures for the impacts resulting from the construction of a northern access road linking the subject site with S.W. 43rd Street. 3. Mitigation of both on-site and off-site recrea- tional impacts resulting from the potential development of the subject site. . Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department., Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by January 7 , 1981 . Published: . December 24 , 1980 NOTICE OF .ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects: 1 . ° 'b Lv N I N ,R- LIV -7R --605D1111Meggill Application for pre imina . p at approval of three- lot commercial subdivision (repldt of existin. Mastro Short Plat, Short Plat 352-79) , g ,11,C@ T971gmogip property located on the south si.e of'N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N.E. 2. L. I.D. NO. 314 (ECF-633-80). PrOposed roadway improvements (widening curbs, andf gutters installation, storm drainage to East Valley Road) ; property located on East Valley Road - S.W. 16th Street, S.W. 19th Street and S.W. 27th Street 3. DAVE BEST (ECF-634-80) Application for rezone from G to R-3, file R-125-80, to permit future construction of multiple 'family dwellings ; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1 ,000 feet south of S.W. 43rd Street Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by January 7 , 1981 . Published: December 24 , 1980 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A G END A DECEMBER 17, 1980 COMMENCING AT 10: 00 A.M. : THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM PENDING ITEMS: JAMES BANKER (ECF-623-80, SP-111-80) SEVENTH AVENUE CORPORATION ("THE 650 BUILDING" ) (ECF-636-80, SA-126-80) MT. OLIVET CEMETERY CO. (ECF-567-80, SP-047-80) VALLEY OFFICE PARK, PARK II (ECF-602-80, SA-092-80) NEW BUSINESS: ECF-634-80 DAVE BEST R-125-80 Application for rezone from G to R-3 to permit future construction of multiple family dwellings; property located on the west side of Talbot Road South approximately 1 ,000 feet south of S.W. 43rd Street ECF-629-80 POITRAS' PRELIMINARY PLAT (REPLAT) PP-121-80 Application for preliminary plat approval of three-lot commercial subdivision (replat of existing Mastro Short Plat , Short Plat 352-79) ; property located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 600 feet west of Union Avenue N. E. . / /6 Date circulated : /v2/ ,go Comments due : /02//90 E\IVIR®N EF IAL CHECKLIST REVIEU SHEET ECF - 6R9 - 9� APPLICATION No (s ) .f� i ,AV,04,9,7oga k7letel 3 /Q ) L) /a1_g8 : 5sfan-3sFYa l} -Ps-a-79'esrhe ,'-moo) PROPONENT : #j h POo `f�� PROJECT TITLE : / /•7"�i!'4 �9c /seer/kit— Brief Description of Project : gore S LI 716 rein/a.1.544csIcTI-S,• 11'4.. SCE r tear ' .iM141 P I leV5�v9e (°5 en ] e."rope r't7 LOCATION : X c/ 1 c y IA. Sa cIe � 6t�'leR�E ©��i't✓Fsl'a( GJ�i9iCd���1 P/�1� SITE AREA : t f l9soxere,5 BUILDING AREA (gross ) DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3 ) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : st'it— ^;s 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : Sgor ice S- L.-t-e, ,a,.; �y- east : R _� ��`�a►-� (3.e¢n'c� /c.-t/ ri,‘ south : ,`4/042 den Twit. we p,I west : ':taaar rr ;•64.5,aaovv.ri�n Lei e `�t]►e a vow 0 cl Ce m e r Land use conflicts : View obstruction : Po55a•hi p 144,e „_ az [sr[eeveg4s46 SC.'Ail 9 ) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : ' 0 .11 elet ayst.a•(12,Zi+ c6,,- efeeg'svazier, traffic impacts : kelsr 14 ) Public services : I 15 ) Energy : �r 16 ) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18 ) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : �r 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : ! (/ 14 a-v4we.kt c-01-415(s20 ,cc-fft vipa-devedziel-ftes • 1,4,2 5 c Co 41(5ca 1-cect.vt-f Joe- ® oeff'.7 f314-�it(C1'r_Ql� ,O7 Recommendation : DNSIL� DOS More Information Reviewed by : 6+evetsekuyk,s00, Title : I 'I P/ er- Date : FORM: ERC-06 • CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. f40 1"?/yyfe MAJOR PLAT DATE REC'D. TENTATIVE APPLICATION FEE $ x PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL FINAL • REVIEW FEE $ RECEIPT NO. SM NO. PUD NO. • APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : 1. Plat Name & Location Poitras' Plat Approximalpjy A50 ftPr West of N.F. 4th St. Union Ave. N.E" Intersgction along N_F_ 4th qt_ 2 . No. Lots 3 Total Acreage 1 . 14 Zoning B-1 3 . Owner Dick Poitras Phone 451-0209 Address 201 116th Ave. N.E. Bellevue, Washington 98004 5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed Telephone ( x ) ( ) ( ) Electric ( x ) ( ) ( ) Street Lights ( x ) ( ) ( ) Natural Gas ( x ) ( ) ( ) TV Cable ( ) ( x ) ( ) 6 . Sanitation & Water: ( x ) City Water ( x ) Sanitary Sewers ( ) Water District No. ( . ) Dry Sewers - ( ) Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION: TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED APPEALED EXPIRED 10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : DATE DATE BOND NO. AND TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . � �/ Rev. 1/77 X P/a74 of f i ;WO 44®ai Ia11 *48622-7 9 • jam'- a ==:ter CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON •' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. - • '150-/2/-Id Environmental Checklist No. E44— ‘2 ,7- ; PROPOSED, date: • ' FINAL , date: , - ® Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance .' f1 ® Declaration of Non-Significance ' 0 Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • . . . . .. .. .. , . - _/:, I. ) t' . Introduction The State ,Environmental Policy Act of 1971, "Chapter •43.21C, RCW, requires , all state and local governmental. agencies .to consider environmental values both for their-=' own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an' EIS be' prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the•'environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. . . • Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your 'ans-wer"s' are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government .decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you' provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. • ' . . . . . . • The following questions' apply to your total proposal , not 'just: to the license for which • you are currently applying or the proposal for'' which approval -.i.ssought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal: when.; it is , completed, ,, . even though completion,.may, not,occur until sometime in the. future , -This will,' allow all of the agencies which, will be involved to complete thei"r-'envi,ro;nmental': review'; now, with out duplicating paperwork in the future. •!',.;i,IF �','"'7.r' ;i:, ''i' ' NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state'a'nd,(1ocala>agencies� in!:",the. State:,• '• of Washington for various types of proposals Many..of.. .th ; ques,tions', may not'.,;apply '.to:' .: your proposal . If a question does not apply; just, answer.'i :i,t:`"':no"hand{conti°nue;,.on, to,; ,the. ' next, question. 'i 1•,,: ��i,:'�,.' !",>i '•.'�`��;.; I. ,., ,• ; - • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMA.; ; :'' ' >'1j•. .+�`.qt { , ;',.' '- I. BACKGROUND. '± , ,;,,,'..,'.,,.1 i i I,,.:i•••,i,,• ,,•. • *IN- l 4 t it I • t 'Will n '`, i' ,I, i.,, { III: 6 i•- I iarri S. Tsao & Co ' .1 '1. Name of Proponent R.S :J 1 . ' 2. Address and phone number .of Proponent. •,1;;., .',:• -^;'a:� . i. ,` 2367 Eastlake Avenue East-•'i�.:' 'I'.. I.•Y. '-.4 ¢ .;;,1 ,.;1' i. • ;',• • Seattle, Washington 98102- , . i ' , .a ;,.. ., . ..I- -..0,-.... !-' ' • • 324-8780 11` i'• 1 �1. 3. Date Checklist submitted November 21 , 1980` ' :',':' ' ' 4. Agency requiring Checklist City'ofRenton, Planning , • 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: ' • Poitras' Plat 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal ' (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : . The proposal is a commercial subdivision, consisting of 3 lots. Each lot contains approximately 16,000 Sq. Ft. The total acreage of the subdivision is 1 . 14 acre. The type of services which will be available to the public will be a , convenience store, tire shop, and several other service oriented businesses.' . -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The North property line is abutting the southerly R/W line of the N.E. 4th St. in City of Renton. The East property line is approximately 650 feet West of the intersection of N.E. 4th St. and Union Ave. N.E. Fourth Ave. N.E. is currently travelled by motor vehicles. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Fall.of 1981 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : . approved formal subdivision utility permit . 10. Oo you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No. . 11. Do. you know of any plans by others which may: affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See attached application for preliminary subdivision, II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ' (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) . Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x VET' WArtiT NO (b) Disruptions , displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil.? x ' Yr ' MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x YEs MAYBE 3 (d) , The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Yrs MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or- water erosion of soils.,. either on or off the site? x YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in depositi'6n or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or ,any bay, inlet or lake? . x Y Mom3 • Explanation: (B) Minor excavation may be required if existing utilities is required to be extended to the subdivision and for building foundations. (E) During the construction of utilities, if any, and later the buildings and service connections the exposed soils would be susceptible to erosion. -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air f quality? YES MAYBE • NO (b) The- creation of objectionable odors? • YES FIATECE NO (a) Alteration 'oaf air movement, moisture or temperature, or any ,change in climate, either locally or • regionally? "' • x YES MAYBE WO— , Explanation: (A&B) Machinary•that is required for any excavation, ' if necessary, will deterirate the surrounding air quality. This • . deterioration will be negligable. ' • • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: . . • • (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of x water movements, in either marine or fresh-waters?: ' .. I. , . ' YES • - MAYBE NO. , • (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterhs; or , the. rate and amount of surface water runoff? '',{ 1i '. '. • x - ..';I :!.,;', ' 'YES' MAYBE 'NO " ' f (a) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 'wafters? .'..; .,.'. x. . ' i . - , .i: +I•.. .. - I ;YES' M BE, .NO • (d) Change in the amount of surface water i.n' any;: water,. .'1 ,- ;II • body? ' , , 1,,. '"I "i' ', .i '' ,: ,x' .I' i;i',. I; • ' i YES..' :.MAYBE 'NO - . ' (.e) Discharge Into surface waters, or i n any alteration " ''`!s`' , ..''' i'i� I ' surface.,wate'r quality, including but not limited'•to`i :;;�''';'i :1i: ''',: I ' I;' temperatures, �di,ssolved oxygen,'or turbidity?`! -.'ll" ` .:! - .'' '"` `x • ' u -1 YES M E''.r,� , '(f) Alteration ,Of the direction or rate of`',,flow;.o,f;''i :' ''I''`' '•I ,, I i.: •I".It,,;y,l,'„ :?;, i';:,i�„Is,� .I'S �� ,,nr�'; �'; i' � .n,tl,.'t; ground' waters? .'i .,.. ,. ',., • ' 'I. :X ; li. „°I' • ,,'.:,.-;,', 'E 1,',1MAYBE' ;''NO'.. -:-I';',:;!;! '... ",'Itl • u', r:.,.' �,i,1. �, ,.,h,;'i,'.{,�N�{I I. ,I ,, , {` 'i j ''I. (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters '1'e,ither` `�,' ''i" I� Y' "1i.: ', ;,; `: , ,.i,, g �., L;r ,I,.ll,ni ;i1{'.11 iN,�;,, :P'i.' , �;�;, s through direct additions or.,withdrawals; '.or':th'rough....it:.... ,. .. .,; _.; '''.I',''' interception{ of an aquifer b'y, cuts or excavations?. '' di x: •,'P; ,,i_ :'r,` 1''' I HI;, ' :il.,�',''; i'1;,; '1,' YES ; 'M YBE: ,,.,Nc. , la' '�', ,� I��i �.,. !11 ,lit ,,II�i ;,i I iu I (h) Deterioration in ground water. quality, ;e,ither"•',through!,_.'.'; 'i ' ' 'I it direct injection, or through the seepage' offi.;,'l.eachat'e,o-'!.I$ 'i , 1a. i; ; ., I;''I phosphates', 'detergents, waterborne virus or; bac;terial;.. ,, ;':,,=..;:.:;,;: I' ` ',::,'.'; or other• substances into the, ground waters '',.; is i,, ,' :' I_ ': ' : • i x .. , I?, ...;.': !;, '' ,J':Y E S �.;. 'M-A Y B E.,,`.• NO.. , - (i ) Reduction in'. the' amount of water otherwise 'avai'l'able ?` ''!' :'' for public water supplies? . ,, ,i ' ! ,' I' x • • I. I' '''' E'S ° It tire NO • Explanation: (B & G) Driveways, parking lots and buildings' will virtually • cover the 'entire site. Thereby decreasing the. amountlof water., ' ..•'•''' infiltrating:to the aquifer. •.'• ' •' .. ' ' • • , (4) Flora. Will' the; proposal result in. • - j, • • • • I ', (a) Change in 'the diversity of species, or.'numbers-,,of any''. , .: , , . species of flora (including trees, shrubs, g.ress, crops, • microflora: and aquatic plants)? x I '. YES • MAYBE , 'NO , ('b) ' Reduction' of the numbers of, any unique, rare,:'or'': .. ' . endangered-species of flora?, . '`.I, i . , ES MAYBE. ,,NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area., •or ' • . , in a barrier to the normal replenishment'of, existing - species? • ETS MAYS 'NO .(d) Reducti.on in acreage of any agricultural crop? . . vE-- MAYBE NO • Explanation: The existing vegetation is limited to pasture grass and several small Alder trees. This vegetation.will be cleared. Landscaping may be required for this subdivision. -4- (5) Fauna'. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including- reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? x YES MBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? x YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? x YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x YES ' MAYBE NO Explanation: The commercial businesses which are planned may attract additional traffic over and above what is currently existing. (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce. new light or glare? X TIT- MAYBE 'W Explanation: Same as 6. • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x YES MAYBE NO • (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The construction of the proposed.improvements will . • cause a small depletion of natural resources and nonrenewable resources. • (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? TES UM' NO Explanation: - • (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . YES M-�YB-E' N Explanation: • , -5- ' (12) Housing. .• Will the proposal affect existing housing, or , create a "demand for additional housing? !• x • YES MAYBE NO r Explanation: (13). Transpor/ tation/Circulation.. Will the proposal result in: • • (a) Generation 'of 'additional 'vehicuar movement? ' ` x' . - YES MAYBE NO . .._ . (b) Effects on existing parking. facilities , or, de'mand • ' '' - ' for new parking? x ' YES MAYBE . NO . (c). Impact' upon 'existing transportation systems? ' :•'.i4,' x ;, ' • • YES . • ,,MAYBE,' ` NO -- • ` ,.,.11., ,. I '^I ;I .,., .ii. ,a'iG;, ' . ('d) Alterations.' to present. patterns of circulation or • • ,.; ' ' • . 1 .. . movement ,of,::people and/or goods? e ,... _,.,. .rl' x' r' • it A ';11, • , . (e.) Alterations ;',to waterborne rail or- air, traffi1c?,'•I ! '�' • • .. (, ,. t,,a. .. ,_.�....: t;)•9.:)��irr:' ;%i,:;rM..: ,:�ip�l: ki;•,,,,,,-..:,� ,�. i '4.,'4,; rj1, i., '7�'; , • (f) Increase `i'n:",traffic hazards to motor vehi"c'l.es!.; :!. "" `"?. I'`' r,+;' ;t1;', ! bi C c,l i'sts`or' edestri all '? .., r"rl, yt `"@, .,•;, tt .x... V .1,1t'.,, . 1, ' '1 , .i y P� S 1 ;�;° '',�' ,{;' G.IJdJi, '� u .x--v:'t.'s,v- �5�;> Ir:,;, ,,�,• '.I • �•i. 'j � � �t''"• '''' t,r4 t,9,��, j::p l'i;,-�' tj ii-� .h ., .I'. • • "It'Q"'i '{' t ;'I:�' !;''f` ' al,l:".ItP',t,o,t4"'s �h,;, , t. ' • �;' . :j`:I'li,l �'� ;.. r .. ,r:. '.'N��°t :if�.�'d:•at,41�,.iw;r;5i:..et! _''1'I�{�''fy'j�E'' ;;i isi.p•'.l'':,,l,j,l• ,:ii, eJ „I',- ,!`` .Tr ,i ''I• ,i I �'' 0t ' -';'II,',.'.' ft:`:'-,i,.!I,ilCC:t0.1: .;1'r1t.a`,.,'.�3°.,:,.,;';:a:.-.''P', ,.4.;:t' q''..•� ';: I '•Explanation: '•( A•-& F) •-The'proposed commercial''businesses:ywil' create':',;' r" ..!' .. • ,,. .II , I' ..0 :, ,' ,'. .is-,. ` ,,17:' .q. ,y ,,.:1 j , ,G additional :turning traffic which will) cause''additional,'rfraffLC ,•I•7'' , - !'' :1- ' : ., ...I- •'• Y.J.".+ :4' :'7t` J.11 Vi,i l:. '4_'r�,.p' -'11..'', �^,',� ' r,l• K Y 1 I- , ', ',�laF 4` x. � i,. ";f'�;;°1 1 �' ',.; ��uii,,����`s�,�;'.y:l3,n.'y�I11iStS.tri, '•+:'�, 'q''d .1',-_,. � lr I t 4 .t',�l�.I'�,i.'1 M1�:�ril� �,.,. 4'l�V. 1 I-V,O•t't f ' 'S,, ;; I hazard,- ., f.. { ,r h' ;: . s ;;(�) ;'Tfie development willyr,:'equi're�.new;.parkin�•;,a'hess�..�'t, ':'' �+� f� ',, ,,. _.;•vl:"" ';+,.. ,f;;. L',f- r ., 4 '.1,t 6 ,r,"'. -.i:�q,^,,..;riRy Irt 'r 11 •f, .t,. ;1 i. r - -.,- ,. �I�"�F.{ff Ij'°' li;��,' -- t�.. �tr '��I:. :!j�rlY!t ''' 'i �! i 4 I r' 'i•'1•":., .I':' „l. 1.1""�.:'.;1�4,'` : t;,.11,'')"X 1\'.a-+;f'..I;'tri r ,�,, I.,,, .u'. G r1;•.a�', ',r:�� .l"l I`i 5 j;y,.Ih 6 :'1' ! �Yi ,.., •I ll,..I: — - ,.,i,, ,1,1,,, I':,{i •:,.. ' ,,.:. {y' l '1 7 ',,{,r,.' ',i ,'.:4. ... ,;� ;1 ��1j' •�r•;iV S;l; �,.;.�,...'.�'l�j'..'i;f,,.�.�� T. I 1, „j,7,1�, 1 �F i; �' '(. (14) Public Services �� Will the ro osal have an ':e:ffect1i';',u on' "p'ti'" '`"` ;f1. �',!'' . I I,,. a {,,, ,,Mir P;. � ni ii {I Ij,�'1•'�l'�i�l.';: :w:4,j� 'J' i ...l v'•. ;• 7 ,result i.nll'a':need ,for' ne'w .®r._altered":.governmen'tal";serv,icei'l'�.` ' "'' -,:`. ' ` ','•I' ")t . . jinn any ofrathe foil lowing areas : .i, ,,,1;,... r I' :i•�. ;' , 1 •r; 4 1l.:, • i..f��;Tii I,.'!:IlHi? 1, 'f,�,' i' i .;,'_II ,''lL., ;' ,Lil. ,r. ;r i' ;(a) Fire ,protection?' a;, ''I,i::: „,,,', ': X.,..",.,:j,: .'-7 ;- !:,', t; 'YES -, MAYBE'''H ,N ,. ;�" '11 . ,-, ,(b)' Police;p,rotection? . i, �' x _ �' . _ "`; _ ,,, '-',i. ,'i -°I'YES;'"'i��`MAYBE .fNO • ;i 'I„ • - (c) Schoo1ls? .., I ;I I, YES MAYBE NO ' ' (d,)' Parks or '.other recreational facilities? 'I,. , I. ' r • x •' , . „ '� ''' - • YES • •",MAYBE, NO (e) Maintenance• ,of. public facilities, including. roads?''r x' YES MAYBE ' NO • ;I ;I , •(f) Other governmental services? ' " ". ' ' - ' `-'-• ' ' ' ' x 1% ' ' ' : I,:!•'. :;;r:. :YES. , MAYBE' NO. j', Explanation The planned businesses will require"both police' and fire pro. tection services.. ,Other services may' be required depending on'the 'types • of businesses which have not been determined at this'writing:l I"1: `''''i•' ''''',i':' ',i' ' • (15) .Energy. .Will the„`proposal result inn . ' "-''\ ; : .' i - ' ,' p i,, ...' t• ' J �;.:{.• 'r ,I•I , ., pia •,w ,�F"V, , (a) Use of. substantial amounts of fuel or energy? , ,!.. r' •.. '` •" ' x, , „ 'I ' :'.ct. ;i, ".'' ; !h' 'YES - MMTYB-E'',:No ,.:}ji,r• ' (b) Demand upon existing sources "of energy,. or,"require.; • , the development, of: new sources of energy?. .• , ' x !' t YES MAYBE NO, Explanation: `.Additional demand will be placed on both electrical ; • , and gas energy for lighting and heating of the 'buildings. '' (16) Utilities. Will the .proposal result in a need for. new systems, -or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power; or, natural gas? x . YES- MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? x YES MAYBE NO - • (c) Water? x YES MAYBE NO -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? 'x YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? x YES M Fir (f) Solid waste and disposal? x • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ( A through E) Service connections will be required. Solid waste disposal will be required after the occupancy of the proposed commercial buildings. (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x YES TAM' N0 Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the - proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: There are those who feel buildings in general - are aesthetically offensive. • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ' x YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal, result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES M YBE NO Explanation: • III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (signed) George F. Runnels (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 AFFIDAVIT I , Ri_chard W. Poitras , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted _are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 24th3ay of November , 19 80 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle (Name of Notary Public) hYelene Schlossberg (Signature of Owner) Seattle 3 G. 3 - / 0 / 5:4-tie , S (Address) (Address) (City) (State) zs-z yS 7 —0 2 o 7 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73