No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA75-832 r- A j - , - S... -, r r..���.... SENDER:Be sure fq follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) - •1 (Additional charges required for these services) 1 IIShow to whom,date and address Deliver ONLY • where delivered to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SIGN ORE OR NAME OF.—ADRESSSS�EE (Must alwaya•be filled in) CERTIF ; ';.e iv 0 4Z-1//,_I/' `y © SIGNATURE OF APDRESSEEE-'AGENT, IF ANY 7 v j•ED N3iz i i VV1U . . HOW WHERE DELIVERED (OM if.rn �g q, stend include ZIP Code) } 0s36/ U.S. POSTAL SERV R E N tO OFFICIAL BUST r. \ .o (, r 19D PENPAYMENTR OFI POSTAGE,T;O13 n U ```` 1 ,gbd1mark of DeolJyeririg 6 e P. ,-'SkNDER IN TIONS �' rn Print in th. -p. a b2MAw your name,ad including ZIP Code. RETURN • If spe s�rvices are desired,eQe lock(s)on other side. TO Z • Moisten , ,`,�1icyM uda back of article. M 02 M , CITY OF RENTON 'E 7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ii ; CITY HALL 4, RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 OF R4,1, © z THE CITY OF RENTON t$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 oamiL ammoBARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 CO' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 09gT�O SEP0° June 27, 1980 Mr. Chris 'Palzer P.O. Box 5226 Redondo Beach, WA 98054 RE: File No. R-832-75; Chris Palzer Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Palzer: Pursuant to the certified letter, dated June 10, 1980, and a secondary _ letter, dated June 18, 1980, transmitted to you from the City of Renton Planning Department regarding inactivity of the referenced file, the application is being officially dismissed by the Hearing Examiner this date. If the city can be of further assistance to you in this matter, please contact either this office or the Planning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, 1:21 V(43+-•• Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk OF R4,4 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U 4$ 0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 amm BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235- 2550 o P June 26, 1980 6�TED SEP�E�O� MEMORANDUM TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner �I1 FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director BY: David R. Clemens, Senior Planner ' RE: UNPROCESSED APPLICATIONS The attached applications are more than one year. old. This department has reviewed the dismissal process with the City Attorney who indicates that following notice to the applicants, that the Examiner should act to dismiss the applications. Pursuant to the Attorneys recommendation, on June 10, 1980 each. applicant was notified by certified mail that the application was inactive, and would be recommended for dismissal unless comments to the contrary were received by June 24th. With the exception of the application for rezone by Chris Palzer (R-832-75) no comments have been received. Mr. Palzer has not responded to my letter of June 18th which indicated that he had not provided sufficient information to reactivate his file. Therefore, it is recommended that the following applications be dismissed by the Examiner: PALZER, CHRIS, R-832-75, rezone from G to MP and H-1 TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SP-029-77, special permit to construct a maintenance and equipu�nt storage facility in the NP zone TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SA-030-77, site approval for maintenance and equipment storage facility in the NP zone KELLY, LLOYD W. , R-147-78, rezone fran R-4, R-1, and B-1 to B-1 COOKE, THOMAS, R-279-79, rezone fran G-6000 to R-4 KOHL-CHRISTIANSON, PP-335-79, application for preliminary plat for a seven lot single family subdivision (superceded by PP-008-80) DRC:dc FARRELL, GENE 0. , PPUD-355-79 preliminary PUD for 54 unit condominium development Attachments OF Rg, A. p ' # -, 0 THE CITY OF RENTON 'Q U �� 't MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 - .. •° • o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT o 9.6 cy 235- 2550 o94TFD SEPI��O(Q June 18, 1980 Chris Palzer • P .O. 5226 Redondo Beach, Washington 98054 RE : R-832-75 Dear Mr. Palzer: We are in receipt of your letter of June 16 , 1980, noting that you wish to continue the above referenced application. In reviewing the files on this matter , we find that there has been no response to the environmental review requirements stated in our letter of May 12, 1975 (copy attached) . Without compliance with these requirements , we cannot process your rezone application any further. As I noted in my letter of June 10 , 1980, we will need a specific time schedule which you propose to follow to. provide the City with the necessary environmental information . If the time schedule is received promptly and followed, we will be able to retain your file in an open status and proceed in accordance with both state environmental and local review requirements . Unless the schedule is received by the City by June 24, 1980 (as noted in my letter of June 10th) , we will be recommending to the Examiner that your application be dismissed. If you should have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this department . Very truly yours, Gord n Y. Er '-c den, : , Pla ning Dir or ( I 0, Li/ g ' At/70 . Da`Gid R . Clemens , Senior Planner DRC :sh Attachment - / A::\ Cg.k..\\Ih V.. \ June 16, 1980 JUN 18 1980 1 \ <4;# Mr, David R, Clemens, t1/c, pFPP Senion Planner - -' THE CITY OF RENTON Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave South Rention, WA 98055 RE: your letter dated June 10, 1980 R-832-75 Dear Mr. Clemens: In reference to your letter dated June 10, 1980, I wish to continue with the application:and to my knowledge I have met all the requirements of the application, Respect,ful=l3y, & � Chris Paler, /' P.O. Box 5226 Redondo, WA 98054 CP:ca CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE Chris Palzer STREET AND NO. t Box 5226 CO P.O., STATE AND ZIPP CODDE��++hh ��7Q R(� I CY) r OP IONALeSERVIt)B FOk�1bDIYlOHdi-FEES 6-10-8'" RETURN olo1. Shows to whom and date delivered ,�,� With restricted delivery t RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered y� SERVICES With restricted delivery EkS 6 RESTRICTED DELIVERY SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— , (See other side, Jan.19713 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL . GPO:1975-0-591-452 STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER POSTAGE (first class or airmail), CERTIFIED MAIL FEE,AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES.(see front) 1. If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, leaving the receipt attached,and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural.carrier. (no extra charge) 2,- If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If yot want a return receipt, write the certified-mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach it to the back of the article by means of.the gumm.ed ends. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED. 4, If yociwant delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article. Check the appropriate blocks in Item 1 of the return receipt card. 5. Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry. OF I? 40 ; �- THE CITY OF RENTON 4" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oaamm sea ~am BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11, 235- 2550 • 0,9g7' FO SEPSE-O CERTIFIED MAIL 733827 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED June 10 , 1980 Chris Palzer Box 5226 Redondo Beach, Washington 98054 RE : R-832-75 Dear Mr . Palzer : The above referenced application have been inactive for a period of more than six (6) months. In order to clarify our files , we wish to know if you will be proceeding o•n this application . If you propose to proceed with the application as submitted, please forward a schedule which you propose to follow to complete the application . If you do not wish to proceed with the application, or if we do not receive a response to this letter within fourteen (14) days, we will request that the Hearing Examiner dismiss the application . If the application is. dismissed , any renewal will require a new application and fees. If you should have any further questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact this department . Very truly yours , Gordin I . Erick an, Pla ning Dir c o-r AJ ( m ns , Senior Planner a DRC :sh Of R4, U Is 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR s PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9q c 235 - 2550 O9ATFD SEPiE ' MEMORANDUM June 3 , 1980 TO : Fred J . Kaufman , Hearing Examiner FROM : Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director By: David R. Clemens , Senior Planner RE : UNPROCESSED APPLICATIONS The attached applications are more than one year old . This department would recommend that they be dismissed . They are PALZER , CHRIS , R-832-75 , rezone from from G to M-P and H- 1 TRI -STATE CONSTRUCTION CO . , SP-029-77 , special permit to construct maintenance and equipment storage facility in it-P zone TRI -STATE CONSTRUCTION CO . , SA-030-77 , site approval for maintenance and equipment storage facility in M-P zone KELLY , LLOYD W. , R-147 -78 , rezone from R-4 , R-1 , B-1 to B-1 COOKE , THOMAS , R-279-79 , rezone from G-6000 to R-4 KOHL-CHRISTIANSON , PP-335-79 , application for preliminary plat approval of 7 lot single family subdivision DRC : wr Attachments L U f,. , ' ��. THE CITY OF RENTON 2 o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 D zi AVERYGARRETT, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT �,o �Q. 235 - 2550 04 1EDSEP-1E�O MEMORANDUM May 14 , 1975 TO : Files FROM : Michael L . Smith RE : Proposed Palzer Rezone I talked today with Chris Palzer owner of the. property proposed for H- 1 rezoning . I reiterated our require- ment for further information in order to make a deter mination of Environmental Significance persua,nt to the State Environmental Policy Act . He was not pleased with the requirement , and I tried to inform him that we are bound by SEPA and treat all parties equally under that law. MLS : rh • • CITY OF RENTON U 1915 REZONE APPLICATION 1:A;414 2 -.. For Office Use Only: �1NG APPL. NO. '/ - A3a- 7 6- PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION $50 FEE; RECEIPT NO. 5'ZgS APPEAL FILED FILING DATE 73 CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE ORDINANCE NO. & DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 1. Name GhtRS t • � -phone 9 f/ y 2. Address goN ��,� � 3. Property petitioned. for rezoning is located on 5 /5'3 j p S '�i a/ between gd/// 4 j e and 3,3 Ake 'O ,. 4. Square footage or acreage of property g/Wy 5) }�v 5. Legal description of property ('if more space is required, attach separate sheet) (MO):0 goo ri, 6. Existing zoning L3 Zoning Requested 1 i„p[0,ys_ NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application ,Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. °ofo ® t, ,ir V etWillot fFE RI 04-4, 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. • • 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Vti- 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 2-73 !/41, • /. AFFIDAVIT PzcI , ,iti ,e- , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this ''45;w day of i5,./e4C 19 `� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing E .c2c. • (Name of Notary Public) '' '=";.--re (Address) 'ddress) ono Af L/ will, 9 o sil City) (State) • 1'7 / ^ J,7 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the ru /� ula'tions of the Renton Planning Department governing the f ' . of 4, application . ek aECEI�IEo �� Date Received APR 2b 19�;`c" B y: �� �,�.� N/NG Dts' Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 Ir17 . R-E-N-T- d I-N-D-U-S-T-R-I-A-L T- -C-T LOCATION • Corner of 80th Avenue South and South 153rd Street, Renton, Washington. The west line of subject property borders "Longacres Race Track", the east line borders the 100 acre Metro Industrial Park (Austin Company) and to the south lies the vast 1,200 acre railroad complext that will eventually serve the entire Green River Valley. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Beginning at point of intersection of West line of N. E. 1/4 of S. E. 1/4 of Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East of W. M., with South margin of what is known as Nelson Co. Road in said Section 24, running thence South 0 degree, 331 45" East 1,107.56 feet to Southwest Corner of said N. E. 1/4,. thence North 88 degrees '55' 20" East 920 feet, more or less, along the south. line of said N. E. 1/4 to center of what is known as White River Ditch #1; thence northerly along center line of said ditch as follows: North 19 degrees 40' west 170 feet North 43 degrees 20' west 300 feet, North 87 degrees 501 West 182 feet : thence North 47 degrees 40' West 252 Feet, North 30 degrees 50' west 416 feet; thence North 12 degrees 14' 40" west 219.05 feet, more or • less to south margin of Nelson Co. Road, South 88 degrees 05' West 40 feet more or less to point of beginning, containing 10.364 acres, more or less. Designated. on King County Assessor's Records as Tax" Lot #22. • 0 F &k° ACREAGE • • REM U ED /\ 10.364 Acres, more or less. C� TERRAIN APR 28 1975 Level �9- --� E.r----• • 4/ +/ ZONING NG DEP P'• Agriculture. ..can be rezoned by City of Renton to industrial upon request. UTILITIES • Sewer Area served by Metro. Seventy Tiro (72") sewer line on property with lateral line spudded in. A substantial saving to ultimate user of . subject property. Water Sixteen (16") inch water main along South 153rd, ample supply. Gas Four (4") inch main along South 153rd. Power Power line along South 153rd. Ji• , co 2 ENT 12II1A9 81 65 r � 15I/, tl � I II I .p' S• P• 11 18 17 16 15 IV oiS1 52'53154 55 ,b • ;G LTT r • 22 2019 A 9S �1j1: : • 3,9. 30 121 23 I I/4 S43 19 e, �V^'I�' '1'12 II 10 7 6 14 15 16 ;' .''' 1116I514 :_:,..a.Itlitl� . y o ' �•i2 21 26 25 24 23 22 ' / ... • . LIMY'' • 6 N�CCESS -7-,"Y 60 15 1 31 10987 34 4 ' �r 3� 60 l0 12 �I o�'� R33 `� 16 36 a ,o r.L.4 4 3 04I5 4. 1 14:jai 2 6 n 33 :-• a II 10 9 - 27 es K :t I 18 _I 11,i �' ,• 12' 13;1 6 4; `� 16 30 .s 3 3 �s 19 33 ,su,i7C D `' laze- 2 ,e S (/) -T ,' I rc.56 ♦ , '' 4 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 11 18 I9 It' 23 24 25 26 21 28 29 20 21 22 23 24Ii25 v 28 29 30 e ^4 ® l ® a +�r u '? C o Rjia T �• ® U 53RD 6„ ® �, _ --- - _ KfrN �— .. •• • a • ♦ . . I a I• I , ada'JB . I , I. i,. I. •se Jp • I, I, �''� / .I 11♦ I isLI 11• I I•.III I 1 1 �" is, 1.' o i l . I i 1 1 1 1. 1 I`h ` v l I I 1 I I r ��. I �. ',I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' � 1 a ,1y1R1 1 i 1. 1�1� j1� , 1!21.:i1'.l I; l- 1 . L_1 1 : 7 .,311;alilI:acl5i7:6i_1, 131 V . :,rl'., �I-i -1 . i-151, I�I�I .:1:,I Li 1,.�Lie1 •, I�1 _L� J I��—I— sue _ 7 $ ;" _L:4 ------r--'- 22.121. i,'1.'�' ,,,.,l L_—_—afl—_ I TI ',i ♦: jI•-1..- w ..17.•J— i. JJ,'.U n..- -4...--,:r•- ., -,. .. lo 1-, .ir me hie- _____-i__t__ • , —�c OP ----- ----- r - _ �__ , :. '.. — 4 r- 10 - ---:_. C : • ... p"9 73." • '', ;•, '•�_. ,> '' .'•'.``v;r % _ Sri a7 f, 1 �. , ,i•, :\', ': �QA/IV`•- 20• Q'u 'TR_i ma's.' rli••1.•l,.,i. .t.:•••. •f •i.T,' • 'I '.��• G`, r:•. I• yy (J�?- --1 FZ• >IiSS.LE•R' , _t 10.3E AC ' , I. 4 i jelA t.i ` 7 p '' _.,. ' - :• l'r! ^i"S' :\ . 7.''L..27.' ' t o .. -- .cam , 1 I o —463.9 Goer' Lo$ I3 ' • i . `i 27.' 6 Aces D. VAN WOERDEN 0 ®F . R�/�� a • l 1 [ I C 11 3.42.ACRES I .'� cEb �i� __1 o.c. ,APR 28 ., - • •6` -6 2 ,r ---------- <z 2� ��NG DE?, i Q• � I • R. D. VAN WOERDEN o • 0 27.36 AC. ,• , a Z • . Q a �. RECEIVES CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON V ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET APR 28 1975 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : -yN'NG Application No . Negative Dec . Date Received -5(-,R1-7r EIS INSTRUCTIONS : The purpose of this information is to assist the vari - ous departments of the City to determine whether an environmental impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per- mit for a proposed project . Single family residential uses in non sensitive areas are exempt from this requirement as established by Washington Administrative Code 173-34 . In addition to the following information , please submit a vicinity map ( recommend scale : 1" representing 200 ' to 800 ' ) and a site map ( rec- ommended scale : 1 " representing 10 ' to 40 ' ) . APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW: 1 . Name of applicant 2 . Mailing address A G X kT-10 ate tusk , 9'gct Telephone 9 Y/ 3. Applicant is : XOwner (Lessee (Contract purchaser f JOther (specify) 4. N e address of owner , if other than applicant : C_ Telephone ��-� --•- 5 . General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection � r - 2 - 6 . Legal description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) 7 . Area /L) . 391i 0-C 57S Dimensions 8. Intended use of property or project ( include details : number of units , volume , etc . ) : a f4# cootaptr100 / ilrrik „ 9 . Generally describe the property and existing improvements : pRic g y o LC. W CLL Pie / irE6 'CO /45 A_ AlotTsc_ d A( 74-i 14-t-C ci Iclie% 4441 10 . Total construction cost or fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated : 11 . Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested : Begin End • Beginn at point of intersection of t line of northeast quarter of southeast quarter of section 24, town— ' ship 23 north, range 4 east, V .M. , with south margin of • what is known as Nelson County Road in said section 24, running thence south 0 degree, 35' 45" east 1,107.56 feet ' to southwest corner of said northeast quartezis LheF,Qu north 88 55' 20" east 920 feet, more or less, along the south line of said northeast quarter to center of what • is known as White River Ditch #1; thence northerly along center line of said ditch as follows: North 190 42' west 170 feet', north 430 20' west0300 • feet, north 87 50' weo'6 182 feet; thence north 470 40' we8t 252 feet, north 30 50' west 416 feet; thence north / 12 14' 40" west 219.05 feet, more or ?Ds, to south ' margin of Nelson County Road, South 88 05' west 40 feet, ' more or less, to point of beginning, containing 10.364 . acres, more or less. Designated on King County Assessor's Records as Tax ' Lot ##22. r% 6,.. F RECEhIED �o)_\ APR 28 1975 !NG DE? - 3 - 12 . List any other permits for this project from state, federal , or other local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so , the date of the applica- tion , whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same , and the number of the application or permit : Date Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status,** * Leave blank if not submitted. ** Approved , denied or pending . 13 . Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the proposed project? yes If "yes" submit copy with this environmental impact worksheet . 14. Are there similar projects , both public and private , existing or planned in the immediate area : ye - � don ` t know If "yes" explain . 15 . Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or structure having unique or exceptional historic , cultural , or other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? no If "yes " explain . 16 . Is the proposed project located in an area that may be considered sensitive and is subject to erosion , landslides , floods , etc . ? yes no If "yes " explain . - 4 - 17 . Is the proposed project located in an area that has a number of large trees or other natural landscaped areas , waterways , marshes or wildlife? no . If "yes" explain . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT : In the following questions summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact , both beneficial and adverse , of the proposed . project. Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental. as well as physical , social , and aesthetic aspect . For projects which are part of a more extensive plan , consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed . 18. Land Use : Will the project have a significant effect on land use in the surrounding area? Explain : 19. Project Design and Appearance : Will the project design , appear- ance , landscaping , etc. , assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? Explain : 20. Ground Contours : Does the proposed project have an effect on the existing ground contours of the project location? yes I--- no . . Is the project likely to cause erosion or sedimentation? r yes `' no? If "yes" to either , explain . 1 - 5 21 . Air Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? (Consider the effect of any gas , chemicals , smoke , dust , particulate matter , and odors ) ? Auk If "yes" explain . 22 . Water Quality :. Will construction of the project and use of the completed project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project. ) LJyes Elno . Is there a good possibility that this project will requir an expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities? I yes I Ino If "yes" to either , explain . 23 . Noise : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project significantly affect the existing noise levels of the area? e yes [ no . Will the project be affected by airports , freeways , railroads or other sources of noise? -444e-s -tor- If "yes" to either , explain . 24. Population Density : Will a noticeable population change result from this project? ( Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density. ) (—dyes , no . Will the pro- ject cause periodic or temporary actuations in population due to tourism , employment , shopping , schools , etc . I (yes [jno . If- "yes" to either , explain . r 7 - 6 - 25 . 'Effect on Population : Will the proposed action directly or in- 1` f directly cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? 1 no— If "yes" explain . 1 26 . Schools and Parks : Will the proposed project have an effect on , schools and parks in the area? rro- + If "yes" explain . 27 . Transportation : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? I -J yes Explain : 28. Public Use : Will the project be available for use by all sectors I of the public? ,... Explain : r'r:-Y-e-s-- 29 . Other Impacts : Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project. - 7 - 30 . VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS : Have you made your plans known to interested community or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? yes ?Ilups no If "yes" what are their reactions? If "no" do you intend to contact these people?r- yes no CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE The Owner/Representative identified in Item No . 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is' true and accurate to the best of their knowledge . . --r-.0°.,..,4111410110 ignature Title Date - 8 - TO 'BE 'FILLED IN BY CITY DEPARTMENTS REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : I� 1 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date - 9 - REVIEW BY' OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : _ Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date - 10 - ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL A. Staff review determined that project : Has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects . May have significant environmental impact and a complete A-- environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant prior to further action on request for permit. 1 B . Reasons for above conclusi n : lo /4_ Arn-4 / I /iir of-u e ,44 icyea ,�� 14 P 1 a _ iti4 cotec, . 00? ei;s;laeil . / ad 41,604 em., - : ,- Aidm.editbari _ , ) ;- e-e,y0 ii - G 4' L iftee . ,/e7 , A174 ,Deti . , , 44 0AA1,20, i n F----- , , , , ...0/414-,v_0114:0„aiti ke/Lci, I, ,.i 1400 i t ... /1 \ i,(41, . 0' / 6s RECEII/ED lie_ 0 \ 4: � � 8I9I......F.......„.. �'//-® 1� lax v. C � 1 CP P'"' a era, ‹c rya 66 7-k_ ve.a/cit J4it,624,06a • r--e"-- - 0 / ,eAvy v L i4 CR I'V/Yam/\ Signature o Responsible icial or Authorized Representative Date : %2 Form : EIS-1 Planning Department October 15 , 1973 `1Aq % / RENTON URBAN AREA A N , COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MI P3 REVISED MARCH 1972 11111 -I c, Lint, *--�-- OI LEGEND $p` .. O SINGLE FAMILY � LIGHT lDUSTRr OR M-P A /% ,� ' -- ' -- _ ----'- -- ------ I LOW DENSITY MULT. M. _ HEAVY 1, IC WO {® PUBLIC a QUASI-PUBLIC _■ I . HIGH • RECREATION -�� `:>:<... �` COMMERCIAL I GREENBELT „calm:, ,�I__�' `.'. y{ to ��lm aw ___.......,, ..„.,,, Lit_ , , 1 \ .... ■.�► a __ ' oh. - \ '. ��. LAKE ■_I �, `1� + .1 WASHINGTON - EN °`I IMPlef \ G 11i=jamtt,+:2;,\ ==' wig Alps. \ �, Pi 6��p_ 6� i1 Ill jI!L ii \tIiirplII - _ ,i1.4.6idr1:41 ‘\ ill r '11--1/4` ) ---"' '16 -n —1446 4111EP111,, �� 41 0.. _6 _? gym ► ,, d 11 r&� ,,fig I�� :�.L.. I 1111 ' ' , \ „„.:,.......... _ , ::—Tioigigo !" 11' .::.:::::.::Ma I l'::.:.:'''i.:. q ' ilk ....::::... , iiii.,,p)",:,/. 1111 rs _42,, ,,::::::,....::::::,::::,,,,„ , II\ — i:17.1!:::71:,,,,11:;,:.0.,..:..i'silL - f Y ,., G II �� y .-....4,,,,.,,„c1/4. 0,,,,,,„i4i t.„„syfp '... .....-- „,,. , ,.:, A • ..,: iLwpg.t- lti ���� ,� .1.;; in.: �:: ; �!.1i.i.!1111 ���� y IfilMilqI .� I • NV exei tiff III `,II �= �+ ::i�%::�i::asii?:::::::ii':::::i::`:ii:ii;i:i:i:>i::ii!3i t�i:'i� :i'��� -,,,,::,::;.:: . i 4 pct'l- Ille.1 ��C� � I I J II LI 1 e 1 1 \ C �I. , , -.". q, r LAKE r�9 III i, 1 YOUNGS < < `"��1 ► I I - \ 1 a— 0 J COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN The Comprehensive Land Use Plan is an official public document adopted by the City Council as a policy guide to decisions regarding the physical development of the community . It indicates in a general way what the people of the community consider as desirable future land use development . The areas denoted on the map above are generalized ; for more specific information contact the Renton Planning Department . The definitions listed on the back will aid in interpreting the Map . Specific uses permitted in each area can be found in the Zoning Code of the City of Renton . SINGLE FAMILY An area intended primarily to be occupied by a single family dwelling unit or related compatible uses . LOW DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY An area intended primarily for two-family dwellings , provided that the maximum building area does not exceed 45 percent of the land area . MEDIUM DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY An area intended primarily for residential uses allowing a maximum of 73 dwelling units per gross acre, a maximum of 3 stories , and a maximum of 45 percent of the land area developed . HIGH DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY An area intended iSrimarily "for residential uses allowing the maximum number of dwelling units , the maximum number of stories , and the maximum proportion of land area coverage permitted in the city. COMMERCIAL An area intended primarily as a retail area with some non-industrial wholesale and service activities , office buildings , and uses devoted to the traveling public , such as hotels and motels . LIGHT INDUSTRY OR MANUFACTURING PARK An area primarily designated as having industrial activities and uses involving the processing , handling and creating of products , also research and technological processes which are devoid of nuisance factors , hazard or excessive demands upon public facilities and services . HEAVY INDUSTRY An area primarily designated as having industrial activities and uses involving manufacturing , assembling and processing , bulk handling of products , large amounts of storage , warehousing , heavy trucking and all other uses , except single family and duplex dwellings . PUBLIC AND QUASI -PUBLIC Those areas in which publicly and certain privately owned uses are located, which include utilities , health care , churches , clubs , or philanthropic institutions primarily designed to promote the public welfare or serve the public on a non-profit basis . RECREATION Those areas designated primarily for leisure time pursuits by members of the public , for active and passive recreation which includes such land uses as parks and playgrounds . GREEN BELT (LIMITED DEVELOPMENT AREA) An area with severe topographic , ground water, slide potential or other physical conditions which impair development , and is intended to be developed in extremely low density single family, recreation, open space, or other compatible low density use . \;(p /. (A. p--...///1 ............--------- 1 . • _ .. Coal mine, =, lanned 0 , , s ,. • in Whatcom Coun3,Y1 ,,. . • By PAUL ANDREWS pr lect and thatials a work- • A Federal 'Jay mining company ing on a detailed environmental-im- hopes to develop what it terms one pact statement. of the biggest underground coal The mine, called the Glacier field, mines in the country near Glacier, actually was discovered shortly aft- Whatcom County, northeast of er the turn of the century. Since Bellingham. then, interest has waxed and waned Chris Palzer, president of Canadi- depending on fluctuations in the coal , market. an-American Enterprises Ltd., Inc., said the company expected to be Palzer feels that the potential of the mine has been underestimated. lb taking 500-pound bulk samples from "We have some pretty eminent engi- the mine within 30 days and within a neers and geologists working on this year to be producing coal at an an- ',• project, and they've come up with nual rate of 500,000, tons. , some encouraging finds," he said. "We will be staying within proper environmental guidelines and have GEOLOGISTS believe the mine kept state authorities well informed holds a huge coal seam 60 to 80 feet of our operations," Palzer said. wide, 6,000 feet long and 5,000 feet "There's a lot of coal down there." deep, Palzer said, describing the • The company has leased more • seam as "just about the widest in than 10,000 acres of property south : the United States of America." of Glacier, Palzer said. Much of the He added that "if this is not the property is privately owned — by biggest underground mining opera- the Glacier Land Co.—but the min- tion in the United States, it will be . ing company has obtained state coal one of the biggest." permits for 5,000 acres of abutting State geologists, however, took a state property. more conservative view. Wayne Moen, a geologist for the State De- PALZER SAID the company's ex- partment of Natural Resources, said • ploration efforts were sparked by re- that "at this point in the game,until newed interest in coal as an energy they do further work, it's still an un- source, brought on by higher oil and known field. They're being pretty . natural gas prices and dwindling re- • ' optimistic over the thing." serves. P a I z e r described the coal as "A few years back, nobody want- "semi-anthracite," which has low ed coal," Palzer said. "But now the sulfur content and a high B. T. U. government has slashed estimated rating. "It's a high-quality coal," he oil reserves by over half, and'it's said. come down to a question of develop- He said the coal "hopefully will be ing our own domestic resources." marketed just in the Northwest," Palzer said an environmental as- with only surplus amounts consid- sessment has been prepared on the- ered for export to foreign markets. 3 may 14, 1975 Renton City Council • Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Gentlemen: Our Country is founded on the American Free Enterprise System.... Land has always been 'recognized as the basic source of all wealth. In fact, land is the ultimate sourc.e of the vital sustenance of life itself. However, today the individual is finding it increasingly more difficult to own land without a current economic use or subsidy because of the follow- ing existing conditions: Rapidly, the bulk of rights, within the bundle of rights of ownership are being hazed by adverse condemnation... . Taxes, assessments, and other charges against the land are sk rocketing while Government agencys are , Ri;.1 ( +;/11'T ....CG1-S1'V.HSE most of its uses and benefits and, in some TI ome ns tances, !'rcl►:r, 2'..rc;i r':• '.ice=ai.::ri.+. .lc:,-c..a.:a•1L^..:+e.S..:.:r'a'.::......:. :4'•a'k.Cz•':w..,a.,.l,+ Man's territorial imperative is being acerbated by Government regu- lations, restrictions and controls. . ..In fact, our Constitutional rights of land ownership are being aberrated by Government evasion and Judicial aversion while the dignity of Justice is being extorted' Besieged by the theory that "Nobody can fight City Hall and win", the ownership of land is now plagued and abjured. The Declaration of Independence affirms that all men have been endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights....The Charter of Human Rights of the United Nations simply states that these rights .have been endowed upon man---presumably by the undisciplined collaboration of matter and force without discretion. With the degenerate use of power by those we have placed in authority, it is no wonder that our rights are being abated. The primary and unrelenting heartbeat of man dictates his survival . There must be room to grow and develop ethically. War after war has been fought since the beginning of civili•ltion over the rights of domain. Every Government formed since the beginning of civilization "Failed" when they attempted to usurp dictatorial powers over human survival and ethics. Fascism is a' form of government that denotesTthe illusion.of private pro- perty rights by citizens when in r alit the government controls the use and disposal of al 1 property. t,, To: Renton City Council -2- May 14, 1975 Ronbui rlanninj Department Compare the above with the following example: On December 16, 1965, I purchased ten acres of prime, well drained land on South 153rd Avenue between Longacres Race Tract and the Metro Industrial Park for the benefit of my five children. I intended to develop it as a Mobile Home Park with the hopes of generating enough profit to send my children through College. In February, 1966, i went to the Planning Commission and they thought it was a good idea. When I went to make application, they said that is was no use because there was some talk about a Sewer District being formed and they didn't as yet know where the pipe would go so they would not approve the Mobile Home Park. Shortly thereafter, I was served with notice that Metro intended to build a sewer line through my property so I was confronted with a Law Suit involving Condemnation of Right of Way. I settled this Law Suit by • granting an easement over the West side of my property and proceeded to secure a purchaser for my property. I located a large Dairy which was interested in purchasing my property for $352,000.00. However, that fell through because the Planning Commission said there were plans to put in a drainage ditch and they didn't know where it would end up. Shortly thereafter, in June, 1967, King County sent me':a letter asking for a Right of Way Entry for survey regarding a Flood Control Project. I denied them the right of entry. However, they went upon my land anyway i`tholffi 'eff tcS nd surveyed for the drainage ditch. C. I was dismayed at what was happening so On December. 10, 1968, I sold . the property to Thomas and Dixie Dargan for $450,000 with $50,000 down. Thomas Dargan, who was then the Station Manager for King TV, Channel 5, Seattle, had an associate who was going to develop the property. They had substantial users that were willing to enter into long term leases of the developed property. J On December 24, 1968, the County informed Thomas Dargan they intended . to condemn the property as a holding pond and ditch for a drainage system. in January, 1969, I had the property appraised by Sherwood and Roberts. • • Their MAI , Mr. Charles Williams appraised it at $500,000.00. In June, 1969, the King County Right of Way agent negotiated a selling price to the County of $375,000 which was agreed upon by the Dargans and myself.with the hope of retaining our dignity and peace of mind. in August, 1969, the County informed us that they didn't. have the money to pay us and that they were putting a bond before the voters. ='The Bond failed. To: Renton City Council -3- May 14, 1975 Renton Planning Department The County then informed us they were again putting a Forward Thrust Bond before the voters and requested we be patient. We were and the Bond failed. Shortly thereafter the Federal Government passed the Environmental Protection Act. The County said they needed an Environmental Impact Statement and to please be patient. April 7, 1971 , I received a letter from the County where they were requesting funds for the Fiscal year 1974 (July 1, 1971 - July 1, 1972) . Carbon copies were sent to: Governor Daniel J. Evans U.S. Senator 1•larren Magnuson U.S. Senator Henry M. Jackson U.S. Senator Mike Gravel (Alaska) U.S. Senator Ted Stevens (Alaska) John Spellman, King County Executive Kenneth E. Grant, SCS, Washington, D.C. In the mean time, the Dargaos moved to Portland where Thomas Dargan took a job as Station Manager of Channel 2. He informed me he could not keep up the payments and .gave me a Quit Claim Deed. Being a member of the news media he felt it may serve to the disadvantage of the Station to get publicity out- side the norm of his profession. In March, 1972, the Renton Urban area revised the Comprehensive Plan which is still in effect. • On April 2, 1975, I attended and spoke to the Renton Planning Commission and received their concurrence regarding making a Re-zone Application in compliance to the present Comprehensive Plan. On April 23, 1975, I made application for re-zone in strict compliance with the current Comprehensive Plan and paid the necessary fees (charges) . On May, 14, 1975, I received a letter from the Planning Department (letter attached) requiring me to go into a lenthly Environmental Impact Assessment. • In the mean time, taxes have gone from $728.51 in 1969 to $3,982.50 in 1975. (a copy attached) • tucAded �j tr il' c3:� G`�e my .% ?l � " Ladies and Gentlemen! • Tell me? Does this make sense? _J3L5_..Lh p�Uii!at'�.c Yam{ "a"ly: a;rL^r ilcb ii-0f`R•t_�.b"+•�.r�r;.a� ae.-m`�} " P.S. If we are to salvage Si // what is left of our free enterprise system we need less • Government Involvement. er L 5 Pacific Highway South Federal Way, Washington 98002 01: lib, THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 O ?,o co• AVERY GARRETT, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT" 0 4? < 235 - 2550 'to SEP1 ' May 12 , 1975 Mr. Chris Palzer Post Office Box 5226 Redondo Beach , Washington 98054 RE : Environmental Impact Assessment for Proposed Rezone from G to H-1 (Heavy Industry) and M-P (Manufacturing Park) Dear Mr. Palzer: We have reviewed your application to rezone the property south of S. W . 16th Street between Longacres Racetrack and Springbrook Creek from G to H-1 and M-P . Due to the character- istics of the site , possible uses in an H-1 zone , and pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act , the rezone application cannot be properly reviewed by this Department or the Planning Commission without further information in the form of a detail - ed Environmental Assessment . This assessment will be used in further determining the environmental significance of the pro- posed action and the need for an Environmental Impact Statement. Some of the specific concerns that prompted the necessity of an assessment, and that must be properly addressed include : 1 . The impacts of heavy industrial uses on Spring- brook Creek, the Green River, the proposed P-1 Channel , and general hydrology of the area . 2 . The impacts of heavy industrial uses on adjacent properties , i . e . , Longacres recreational /business use to the west, the proposed Group Health head- quarters to the east, and the light industrial uses to the north . • 3 . the potential degradation of the air quality in the Valley area that heavy industry uses could cause. Mr . Chris Palzer May 12 , 1975 Page Two 4. The potential noise impacts . 5. The potential traffic impacts . 6 . The potential visual impacts and various other potential environmental impacts . The Planning Commission will review your application after the detailed Environmental Assessment is reviewed and a final determination of environmental significance is reached by this Department pursuant to State law. We are enclosing for your information a proposed outline for a draft Environmental Impact Statement that should be helpful in preparing the detailed assessment . If you have any further questions or would like to meet with us , please contact this Department . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director L`G:U .- Michael L . Smith Assistant Planner Enclosure MLS :ms