Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA76-889 Pla \n5 • 4 VWe_3I CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. .3152 AN ORDINANCE OF THE: CITY OF RENTON, WASHIiNCTON , CHANGING THE 'ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES' WITHIN THE CITY. OF RENTON FROM • GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-L1)' AND RESIDENCE DISTRICT • (R-2) • WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulation.) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the. "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith; the property. her•einbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classifiation District (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone cl.aseif ic: ti.on of said property has been. filed with the Planning DeDartment on or about March 7 , 1977, which petition was duly referred to the Hearin Examiner for investigation, study and public 'h ari r, .., and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about June 28 , 1977 , and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearin. Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with th ... City 4 s d:;omprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council Lavir.g duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support. 'thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASH1NC,TON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : __SECTION : The following described property in the of 'Renton is hereby ' rezoned to Business District (Bel) and Residence District -2) hereinbelow specified; the i':'._aheini7 Director is hereby author. i_zed and directed to change the w.aoe of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said ... .. Geis!,; , to-wit : --1- i) 1 4 //.• pri,F1\lh I n \ 'rives rY�CQ%f • TO BUSINESS DISTRICT `(B-1)' Tracts No. 8 'and;,,9, 'Joseph. P. Marshall Tracts according to' the.:'plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30, ,rec,ords:.of King County , Washington; LESS the South.130: feet thereof; and EXCEPT. those portions dedicated for road purposes . TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT '(R-2) The South 130 feet of Tracts No. 8 and 9 , Joseph P. Marshall Tracts according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , records of King County., Washington; EXCEPT those portions dedicated for road purposes. (Said property.. located Southwest corner of N. E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall. Ave . N.E . , Renton, King County, Washington) SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to that certain "Declaration of Restrictive Covenants" dated 8/18/77 , 1977 , which is incorporated herein and made a part . hereof as if fully set forth, and which Declaration is recorded in the office of Director of Records and Elections , King County No. 7708190846 . AND FURTHER SUBJECT to . substantial completion of the development on or before December 31, 1980 , pursuant to the Plans and Specifications as submitted by Petitioners-Purchasers , but in the event no such completion has been accomplished prior to said date, then this Ordinance shall be null and void and of no further effect. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its pasaage, approval and five (5) days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 15th day of August, 1977 . 026„,f, �• I V� � Delores A. Mead, City C erk. APPROVED Y THE .MAYOR this 15th day of August, 1977 . `Charles 9/. Delaurenti , Mayor Appr d as to or•-. Gergrd M. Shellan, City Attorney Date of Publication: 8,-26-1977•'. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Russell Collins and his wife Iva M. Collins , Roy R. Kyle and his wife Alice L. Kyle, and Kohl Excavating, Inc. , a Washington corporation, are the owners of the following real .1� property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of CD Cr, Washington; and C. E. Loveless and his wife Joan E. Loveless Shave contracted to purchase the following real property in the N- City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows : - Lots 8 and 9 of the Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , as per plats recorded in volume 38 of Plats, page 30 , Records of King County, Washington; except those portions dedicated for road purposes; WHEREAS, the owners and purchasers of said described • property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the follow- ing restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : PERMITTED USES Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses allowed as follows : the south 130 feet of the property shall be limited to multi-family uses allowed in the R- ' edence District of Section 4-708, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. The remaining northern portion of the property shall be limited to uses, allowed in the B-1 Business District, Section 4-711, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances , City of Renton, King County, Washington. DEVELOPMENT a Development of the property shall be limited to a shopping center on the northern B-1 portion of the ` 0 property containing the permitted uses of the B-1 �'- Business District, and to multi-family residential development on the remaining south 130 feet of the property containing the multi-family uses of the R-2 Residence District, all of which development shall conform to the site plans., Exhibit No. 6 , attached, dated April 21, 1977 or such modifications thereto or other site plans which the Public Works and Planning Departments , City of Renton, shall have approved in writing. LANDSCAPED AREAS Landscape plans shall be prepared in conformance with the aforementioned Exhibit No. 6 , dated April 21, 1977 , and applicable ordinances of the City of Renton or such modifications to Exhibit. No. 6 or other site plans which the Planning Department, City of Renton, shall have approved in writing; ;.and the landscape plans shall include: 1. Landscaping of the right-of-way of all streets adjacent hp,the property that lie between the boundary -2- lines of the property and sidewalk and/or paving improvements in the right-of-way; and this landscaping shall be of the same general design, quality and quantity as that of the landscaping contained within the development within the: property. 2. As many of the existing trees shall be retained as possible. 3. Intensive landscaping shall he installed along Nr and within the north 25 feet of the south 130 feet of aD OON the property which in the judgment of the Planning LID CD Department, City of Renton, reasonably exercised, shall N f� constitute an effective, visual barrier of at least feet in height. 4. An architectural-type fence of six-foot height shall be constructed on the property line separating the B-1 and R-2 portions of the property. 5. All landscaping and fencing are to be installed within 90 days after construction of the shopping center buildings in the B-1 portion of the property. 6 . Parking lot areas shall be landscaped according to Section 4-.2204. 8.B(3) , Title IV, Ordinance No. 1623, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County , Washington. STORM DRAINAGE Storm drainage plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department, City of Renton, according to require- ments of applicable ordinances and policies of the City of Renton; and clearing and grading of the property shall not 144gr until full and complete approval is 74 -3- granted or issued by said Public Works Department; EXCEPT that existing fill material previously deposited on the property may be removed. INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Along the west boundary of the property shall he con- structed roadway paving of sufficient width that when added to the existing roadway surface will constitue a total roadway surface. The roadway paving will comply ap with applicable, established public street standards per b requirements of the Public Works Department, City of OD t gaga#,00 s Renton. The ewneve shall be responsible for the ad- .}` i'' ditional paving which averages approximately ten feet ., .(10 ° ) in width but shall not be responsible for re- surfacing the existing paving nor for maintenance of the roadway or the new paving. The south twenty feet of the south 130 feet and the west ten feet of the property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for the purpose of public access. Along the south boundary of the south 130 feet and the west 10 feet of the property shall be constructed a roadway meeting applicable, established public street standards of the Public Works Department, City of Renton , and such roadway shall connect Duvall Avenue Northeast to the roadway created along the western boundary of the property. � RS The shall be responsible for one-half of the initial roadway paving necessary for the construction of the proposed roadway but shall not be responsible for maintenance of, that paving or the roadway. NL -74 -4- . Both of the above described roadway improvements shall be dedicated to the City of Renton, free and clear of all encumbrances. CONSTRUCTION HOURS Hours for construction activity outside of buildings shall be limited to the period between 7: 30 a.m. and 6: 30 p.m. on the weekdays of Monday through Saturday. SIGNING Signs shall be approved by. the Sign Design Review OD CD Committee, City of Renton. OD CONDITIONS C f�- This Declaration, of Restrictive Covenants is intended to impose restrictions on the property in connection with its development and use as a shopping center and multi-family residential development. It is not intended and may not be desirable to impose such restrictions on the property if it is not so developed and used. Therefore, if the proposed development and improvement of the property in the manner contemplated and proposed herein is abandoned and does not occur, the restrictions contained herein shall have no force or effect. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 1990 , provided all of these covenants are fulfilled and completed in accordance herewith. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of Kounty by either the City of Renton or any other property owners adjoining described property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable -5- •• • • '• •• • ••• •• • • attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the party or parties whom the court determines is in error and shall be • entered as a judgment in such action. • • • aw-- - 4.4j4.4% -- • DATED this 4,4' day of , 1977. • . , • , . • . . • • (r-Lc.t • Russell Col ns • I) /•• aD CD Cr• • Iva M. Collins • op • 0 ••••1 • • ) „,. , r- • - r Roy R. Kyle( , . Alice L. Kyle, formerly Alice L. Taylor • KA 9 r'( e-1 / • h Excavating, • , 'kohl ExCavating, Inc. • • . . C. E. Loveless ' Joan; EC`"Loveless . •(,/ • • -6- • • STATE OF WASI-IItNGTON, ss. County of King On this 3rd day of August , 1977 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Delores T. Kohl and Ivan C. Christianson to me known to he the President and Secretary, respectively, of KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of said cor or.:.ir-;,. Witness my hand and official scat hereto affixed the day and ycar/farst above. writfen.. rV ail r, • .�• �, l ✓. _.. _ • • Notary Public in and.for the Sint& of 1>'arhiuvon, •-- p�� FORM 28;1. ACKNOWLEDGMENT, CORPORATION rerirliu� atgenton �I l 00 V _ - _ . _. STATE OF WASHINGTON, • ,}z• 1'► Count of KING �' t`] ' ' • RUSSELL COLLINS, IVA M. COLT,Ii On this day personally appeared before me K. KYLE, ALICE L . KYLE • to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. Given sender my hand and official seal this day of. Augus 77 .• REN1O:J Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at LAWYER!TITLE INSURANCE CORP.—ACKNOWLEDGMENT—ORDINARY ' L-42 • • • STATE OF WASHINGTON, County of On this day personally appeared before me `. • to me known to be the ind}vidual._.,. .-rleccri},erl ifl arc} .L_ CACLSJ1 d the within aid tore ro'. imstru^;c nt and acknowledged to me that signed the same as ... purposes therein mentioned, free and voluntary act and deed for the Given under my hand and official seal this day of. 15.. .. ..... .. � , . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at ' L-42 LAWYERS TITLE\INSURANCE CORP.—ACKNOWLEDGMENT—ORDINARY • • • 9 • • I (Lie 1 7U04b • ' -__ - 'N, -------______ . • • - •-- . : .. . ,o. ___L St-IV D.LL. boi'2._:--- • . • 4 . - • -— - -- - ' :',) * . ,. -.-., •t ' -'---7---'t 1 r------ ' - ,...\\. ..,..-. 0..----.--.. e`4.-::--?....,-.'-'------'7.17,,, . ... . -------*'*e'---.1...2:-------N.... 'r"-4,21' • 1, `,, r \., .-,"\-, ' n . ' (/- , .. \ 1/,''.7.,.• __ 1-• \,. ' )..,_J.,....--) \„_, 5 . - • 1 _ ••-. \;`'\',...)" . :.7•' •c• '--•: . \ • ' '' c l''• ' • , ' 7: *.:.•' rr,r \ \ ., ,,,,, r\ • \ ,.r.- i.:r•- . . • :, . . ' ' I .? , •.,..:! 11`•:.- i ' ' . ,. • • 4:7:,' \ \ ••••S-.', ' ! : ?'t ..7 -. :i. b . ; 0-- • • i., . . . . I ,, . , ,• ,_•.1 1...:. : .....i.! \ \ \ i, . , . . , : , ,.., , ).... ' ;...; '...' \s, .... • . .:.• •.'.!' .' 1: \ ,. . .--- ;,,y `,„ N \ , I ,t 1 '''.• • ' i ! ,, '1 ! ' 6 ' - "3...I . • i : ...''• ' L* j.1) 4 * • '-'• ''':" •t- *' • , -: , ,I, ,el • ,ir -, ,• -1 • 1 ... . . ., %I .. .. \ \ \'' .3`.‘ . • . • I' • , •,-1 ' --.: S' (47:‘,71-". .. ' I . ,,.. r • 7.7, , • \ \ • • \,', . -' " • • ., ", ' ,' ' '.! • • OP '' • , !i,':,(.;.• ' ..• .:,:: \ \ , , :. ,: ,$) , \\ :'.\ — •ri ..- • i . I \ ,, „,,,,..., ,. 6 • 6 1 - T.—Th:77' - i : ; • / : . ,.•4:'':r.;• '\\ _ ....iv, ,.c2 ! .•if, ; C.L.-, l'•-• ' ,. ; ti i ' • e''. .. . , .;,,.... 0 . \ ,...., \ .\ ,, ,,, ..2. • e i ' 4'." .1 I '..4.,', tl..1,•, i, ..,I ; 1......,, i • . . I-------I- . \ \...:_--J ; , 1 : • , i -----: ,---, \ -. ' ,°•:-, . , ; '11:* 1 ; .rii..i.-------- I; i ! ! ' :"'* •lo' - " 11,,," : ' - ! ... 7: • 1.7' . \ s -**1.1;2'1' r ,_ \‘_. — :'::).--4----\-1 ' 1 ! r . - • '''''''') •(, :',i..s; 1 I 1! 1 -1 ;.r 1-- _, \—.'iC'7.':;'`./ '. \\ • .i ' ; • ,I. 7. V,1 V • * • 1. a. 4 -.• - ._. I . :‹ \ t-- :, 7R \ . se\--. • i 1 1,..I....1..1 .; i 7 `•• IY. ...—\..:• , I i 13 . • -• :, t -I ''....rs , 1.'r• r 4 (3) 1,-- ii,:::. -...'.",.;-:•"4. Cd7: !, I !:..v: 1 f‘,..i I i ' 1-• ;--:'.,I ..i E. .• .1 L;1 1 ! , i .. J',..,, •cs ,., .2- ,.* i.-- 1(_.s , \ •,\.•-ti, •:' \ r. LS, \ I '.;.' 'i .s‘'',1 7, •••• .,. -A — • 1 :i., CJI t) I ul:".....).1.: 1 : I 1 Ll.r.!?•)1.). :111;''.i'''s l).... ',1:.. 'i ?.3 ik ' . .7. 1 ' • \i '? i I 1 \ d•-1 ,• I 0 .V. • SI:\ \\ I• • r 11 • . ,• .i H:: '(' j.1 .rt• ----' ' •P --r-:\ ' - :) 1. .I; , : ,...; T., \CP.,. • • d Ili ":.1' ? . 1 ; , • ..) • . ''% \--) • , S 1 7":-.,1 . 11"•'i . : 1 li I i t, •. • 4 - !--c) •' ' ..•• -,....•r. ' .., \ :I" -I.':' i I ' I I' ,•II ' i in •. ...:.• ..,r 21 i.' 4 .7- 1 . . .,- . X\C\-\\ --ii.":` ---•-:.•--s- • ) • ; I,, 1 • i 1 l• i c2 '• '''',', i''' 65'1:7'.;•;‘2 ' \ — , \ . I- , . 1,• 0•..,- ..--, '• ':. r... 1.X.''',' 1 ; . • .r.• -, i.- . ' sr., I\\\ ....—' ..-i .1. ' ':‘. .I, i I....6 . i ' . • \ " .' .;. 4•:t •• '' i : I 'f. . .• ‘, \\.\\:-------I.t9—-----''',.-----':-' : 't A;-,,...7.,...r:?-1___ •. *.1 ' ; • ... ,_..• • ' \ '•',, \-. ' . . 're%4..6•7.•••-..--..-1,. ! -. I 1 • -1 ...,..... 1 . I . . •tr • ''.'• • /---' i-----7 ., ... • : . .,.. ' . _ -- ..----.^---1%;;•-el'-'-^-u-7----, ;'`C'r:- -.;=7".,-.;'''' ., / 7/ . ., ,,. ,._. ., I -'4. ..-.. . ',, --.--- L--I-- . / ' 6 • • ;•7 \ • •-- \___. . ._ _..._.__._._.... .._ .._ .. . . . . \ ..M -,1 k1. • • \ \ \ .• • , \ ... - . zo :, .• ' • .. \ \ , 1 , \ • I • . , • • L.. ... -.- ---.- --.••,-=. --_-.,-..:-..:7:7.:-:.....7--a.--7-..y__-_-:.=----.-.-::.-..-:-..:-.77.-.7.....-,-.7.7.-....=_=..--......t...-a...-2.--......--. -' ----1-----=' i '-' -,--, -- ---='—. -..4.-:::::""-"-- fr-t- 1 ... ..... . • ,•••,•,. . ,......... .../••••••• •••• - i • - •-••- •.. • , 0,...C_I\:..D V,k_f—VANNY'4rohiteots •. ., I .......' __..„._._. ._.:.. ___._...„_, • • . . ... ,,.. . -.. _ . • • BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE A2 esi � a, a 8 *qg0 25 Cx" g • BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE R• DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Y.(J CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA SWC Sunset & Duvall • Renton, Washington RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON EXHIBIT HEARING EXAMINER JUN 2 81977 ITEM NO. 0? a AM M 718P9r10,11r12r1i2r3t4s5, • Pursuant to: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 Chapter 43.21c, Revised Code of Washington SEPA Guidelines, effective January 16 , 1976 Chapter 197-10, Washington Administrative Code City of Renton Environmental Ordinance Ordinance #3060 (OF R E/vi, . 9ECc\N�° 4° i City of Renton Planning Dept. Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 f,9�NG • OF o THE CITY OF RENTON L MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 Z 0 0 ': CHARLES J. DELAURENTI• MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT r 235-2550 �,Q4r f0 SFP�E�e c. April 20 , 1977 9 RE : DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT LOVELESS/POWELL , INC . PROPOSED REZONE AND DEVELOPMENT OF A SHOPPING CENTER AND LOW-DENSITY RESIDENCES ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF N . E SUNSET BOULEVARD AND DUVALL AVENUE N . E . , RENTON , WASHINGTON The attached draft document is submitted to you for your review pursuant to the Washington State Environmental Policy Act , Chapter 43. 21c , RCW , and the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance. The Loveless/Powell rezone applications is presently under consider- ation by the City of Renton . Your input at an early date would be appreciated in order to allow review and incorporation of your comments into the Final Environmental . Impact Statement . Please direct your written response to the Renton Planning Depart- ment within thirty five days or by May 25 , 1977 , in accordance with SEPA guidelines. If you should have additional questions on the subject matter , please contact the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very ruly yours , r C ordon Y . ic sen Plannin; 5irector GYE : JAL :ms Attachment TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION Nature of project 1 Permits and approval Date of issue/deadlines DISTRIBUTION LIST Detailed list Exhibit R SUMMARY Scope of project 1 Alternatives " Impact upon site Storm drainage Grading Adapting the project Mitigating the adverse impact DESCRIPTION Central Highlands Plaza 3 Multi-family units Construction timing Physical and 'engineering aspects Rezone application • EXISTING CONDITIONS & IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT Earth Air 6 Water Flora Fauna Noise Light and glare Land use Natural resources Explosion Population Housing Transportation/Circulation Public service Energy Utilities Recreation Archaeological/Historical Population characteristics ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SHORT TERM vs. LONG TERM Serving the community, now 14 Serving the community, future MITIGATING THE ADVERSE IMPACTS Water runoff 15 Aesthetic qualities Professional ,consultants EXHIBITS Following Page No. A Orientation Map 15 B Vicinity Map 15 C Legal description 4 D Land-use designation 6 E Zoning Map 10 F Soils Type Map 6 G Site Plan (Preliminary) 4 H Grading Site Plan (Preliminary) 5 I Utility Site Plan (Preliminary) 8 J Water Retention System 8 K Traffic Tabulation 12 L Estimated Population 12 M Census Tracts 12 N Characteristics of the population 12 P List of Elements of the Environment 15 R Distribution List 1 • iii INTRODUCTION The subject of this EIS is the rezone and development of approx- imately 11 acres of land located in the City of Renton at the ✓ southwest corner of Sunset and Duvall . Approximately nine acres will be devoted to a shopping center development, and approxi- mately two acres to a low density multi-family use. The sponsor- ing entity is Loveless/Powell, Inc. , of Bellevue, Washington. The lead agency is the City of Renton with the responsible offi- cial being Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director. The draft EIS was prepared in the offices of Loveless/Powell, Inc. , with primary authorship by Dean Tibbott. Construction plans will be reviewed in detail by various depart- ments in the City of Renton. Permits and/or approvals will be required for grading, storm sewers, sanitary sewers, water supply, . electrical, plumbing and fire protection systems. Source data is available in the files of Renton' s Planning Depart- ment. Interested parties may obtain a copy of the EIS from the City of Renton at a cost of $2. 00 each. The date of issue of the draft EIS is April 20, 1977. Consultant agencies and the public must file comments with the lead agency, the City of Renton, for incorporation into the final EIS not later than May 25, 1977. Contact person: Mr. Michael L. Smith Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 DISTRIBUTION LIST See Exhibit R. SUMMARY The contents of this EIS and the scope of the proposed project deal with the rezoning and development of land which is mostly unimproved. Existing improvements consist of two single-family residences, plus fencing and several out-buildings . -1- EIS MAILING LIST - LOVELEPOWELL, INC. • FEDERAL AGENCIES . Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Advisory Council on Historic Pres. Environmental Affairs Office of Architectural & Puget Sound Power &Light Co. Environmental Preservation Department of Agriculture Renton Tribune Soil Conservation Service The Renton Record Chronicle Community Services Administration Renton School District Environmental Protection Agency Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce Dept. of Housing. and Urban Dev. Ms. Liz Greenhagen REGIONAL AGENCIES Mrs. Daniel L. Nydegger Metro Eleanor D. Keitzman Puget Sound Air Pollution Control G. N. McComas Puget Sound Governmental Conf. Renton Cong. of Jehovahs Witness Washington Environmental Council Robert C. Steger James W. Hazen STATE AGENCIES L. Stevens Commerce & Economic Development Michael E. Fleming Department of Ecology Lester Lohr Department of Highways Perry Ridgley Department of Natural Resources Anton A. Altoff Office of Community Development Manager, Honeydew Apartments Office of Public Archaeology Manager, Honeydew Too Inst. of Environmental Study ' Resident Institute for. Environmental Studies1315 Duvall Ave. NE, Renton, 98055 CITY AGENCIES Director of Planning Bellevue Planning Department Director of Planning Kent Planning Department COUNTY AGENCIES Mr. John P. Lynch, Director Dept. of Budget & Program Dev. Councilman Mike Lowry Ms. Gayle Wright Housing & Community Development . Exhibit R • The objective of the project is to provide new shopping facili- ties to serve the expanding needs of a growing population. Ob-, vious- alternatives would be as follows: 1. Do nothing. 2. Build a project of lesser scope. 3. Build a project of greater scope. 4. Select an alternate location. Evaluation. of population, travel patterns, and growth trends re- veal a potential for this project as proposed. The physical impact upon the site will be to change its use from one of very low density single-family residential to that of moderately in- tense commercial, with a buffer area of low density multi-family. • The existent land and environment do not hold any special archeo- logical, historical nor environmental conditions which have been cited for retention. No such conditions are known to exist, and no probable condition of this type is observable on the site. The property is too small, and adjacent traffic is too heavy, for the property to harbor any major game species. It is not feas- ible, given the property size and status of surrounding develop- ment, to presume that a "do-nothing" approach would, improve the environment. A more intense development is not indicated at this time. A somewhat larger development of similar density could have merit. Alternative sites are conceivable, but this site was selected with particular emphasis on major traffic routes, and geographic convenience to existing and planned residential areas. A project of lesser scope would not fulfill the specific demand for the proposed facility, thus requiring additional commercial facilities scattered elsewhere in the vicinity. The proposed concept aids in clustering commercial development near the in- tersection as. opposed to development in a "strip commercial" fashion. At one time a natural drainage creek flowed through the property. ' As a result of road work and partial filling of the property, the -2- once swampy area of the creek is now mostly contained to a rela- tively narrow course consisting of filled banks, rubble, and debris. There is little evidence of foliage or growth typically associated with a running stream. Water on the property can best be described as storm drainage. In carrying out the devel- opment, it is proposed that this storm drainage will be contained within a culvert. Storm drainage from the project will be re- tained in a series of catch basins and holding-conduits controlled by restricted orifices and oil separating devices. The rate of storm water runoff will be controlled to match existing rates. The controlled flow will then be placed into the culvert, and .F thence into the water course which handles the existing runoff. (See Exhibit J. ) The project will include a significant amount of regrading. Pre- liminary studies indicate that cut and fill will approximately balance. Although large areas of the existing fill are not suit- able for the construction of buildings, it is planned that such fill will be stabilized for use under parking areas where the load bearing requirements are minimal. The services of a quali- fied Soils Engineer will be engaged as a consultant to the Architect and Civil Engineer who will design the project. Sig- nificant areas of land in the vicinity of this site are not highly developed at this time. There is, however, a well es- tablished pattern of thoroughfares. Historical travel patterns, plus trends in residential development, are compatible with the plans for commercial utilization. At this time the land utilization is at minimum levels. Some vacant portions of the property have been partially filled and at present are unsightly. In the sense that this proposal will carry out a completed, well-designed shopping center concept, it is certain to improve the general appearance of large portions of the property. The possible adverse impacts are in the areas of water runoff,' greater intensity of use, failure to construct a shopping center with pleasing aesthetics, and elimination of -3- • the land parcel from other uses which to some observers might be more desirable. Adverse impacts will be mitigated through careful compliance with construction codes, and by utilizing currently accepted "state-of-the-art" techniques in architec- ture, engineering and construction. DESCRIPTION The shopping center part of the project is to be named "Cen- tral Highlands Plaza". It will be a development, of approximately nine (9) acres containing a super-market, super-drug, and a broad spectrum hardware-nursery operation. In addition there will be satellite convenience shops and possibly a restaurant. There will be no name for the apartment units which are planned for construction on land lying south of the commercial buildings. The intention is to provide a buffer or transition area in com- pliance. with the City's Comprehensive Plan. This area is the south 130 feet of the total parcel, excluding the right-of-way which is being dedicated to the City of Renton as a part of this project. The net land contains about one and one-half acres and will be developed with four (4) four-plexes. The buildings will be well spaced and plantings will be utilized to enhance the buffering effect. This proposal is sponsored by Loveless/ Powell, Inc. • The project is located at the southwest corner of Sunset Blvd. N.E. and Duvall Ave. N.E. (otherwise designated as 138th Avenue 8.E. in unincorporated areas of King County) . . Both of these streets a,re designated and utilized. as primary arterials de- signed to carry major traffic loads from the surrounding resi- dential and-commercial areas. A street address has not yet been established. The legal description can be found on Exhibit C. A small scale site plan can be found as Exhibit G. The bulk of the construction will be carried out commencing as soon as possible after the necessary permits and licenses have -4- • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts No. 8 and 9, Joseph P. Marshall Tracts according to the plat thereof recorded in Vol- ume 38 of Plats, page 30, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions ded- icated for road purposes. EXHIBIT "C" [.. . . OIA'y 7676t,ct L .4 t Pe¢GEt.CtOlc-Tla.t.To any l ri _ _ _ _ _�.losa'_ J = f-74 , _ 1 a 1'1Ia -- — ' 4 LNIIi4 yry 4 LiviiJ na,(+Iw-- 4 WIC, i r I 5 t 4 uJwG ' - - I Ili --A¢tlg4- o :Ni.1Ud UL1r4 r- Ullr a uuRe 7-1..% .7 — — ,ram' I �.ti� LI Of.-Pica-Ti0.J _I —. _ - l ....7 ^1-- -- . f-- I • ;J r. • I; - ._ - -."�_- --� ..--' �.4 •- _--"1?.fir.... i • Ir; 1 Y I a c g I r° r 1 I I t�, c 4. al d • 3 J } d- I s s 4d C I zz > I. I • „ , C r ^r, mo. GGIiT.L D gTCvt 1i4¢.DwA - T pa °♦ e`O `-' K 1I 101,11.tr • 3394- tr sr.,oao •ar. 3° 10♦o' 54.661 •r N S. Ne.o' .r 134.0' „ 9 0 I' .P _ Y I r'—1 1____- I d' A I • I Go' I Lao -_14145'1 i Io' : Q Z 1 1 • i� � ' (A,: I 4. 4i' " 4T" 1 t o g W I• • I 1 �' d W Q 3 W� ro • i „,.....----- )1. • ..- N 1 I „ euILDIU Pd0 0 ` T„le ...f... ^ LO M.r. Ta'T.L •}®. PT. IG50op �), \J 0 • WRM,u TMIO MDA y rr��--•• - 1 t I /4�,..• /aG c..1� iJ It __ „a.00�i _T "� [P IIIIII .......I , �/ \ tom . � T 1. / �' I 517E `aTATIST IC.y ' — - 41hNG U/,111h �/ Pvrv.e T�.rr,G b41+�L r4 aJ .I(/, W�4 UM114 dLH• IU ruksp,..Xes � t+- ��qy /�r1u.1! M • U.GI.C4 b1•Iorrwro ca.rrErz o c.o.o'h I.LC4. ►AEA. raCK1.1a RE4.�CF_D f .. 'r ' rolD KlITGL "A14 '�.rt• I 1a4 NFS g I r4Go J r LEGAL DESGr�IPTIOIJ: ot�b afr-r tt,000 I IIG I led r 1a ' G.T� a••+D T, JMrn. r r.uap„�.. 6LOb ODD 10.000 1 'fL' T...TO,.GG4 To T „..T nP RD(PPCDC t .„i WYM *9 .If Q 10 M 111-01O,,..qf b,ri GO..Cv M MIYO GIY_rTY,Wo11.4,.,pT0.-.',MAGGOT T..f './,R„ 1.01611. g1,1•1. *• Fr I ' ♦I♦o rase Twe.eo•I♦.+o e.cfrr Trdf ro.no,+9 ofolcTf rr w..e vuvrof+. •NUr 41,yoo 4f7 rt. I A '01 e I/LA?N _ _ .445 rRo/.'?orfG • . (PRELIMINARY) EXHIBIT "G" • been issued. Tenatively this will be in July, 1977. Related portions of the commercial construction could occur over a subse-, quent two year period. The completed project contemplates the construction of low density multiple dwellings on land which will be rough graded in the original construction and made ready for construction. Depending upon demand, this phase of construction could logically occur anytime between 1977 and 1982. Although the apartment zoned site will basically be dormant until that phase of construction is started,. portions of the planting at the bound- ary with the B-1 property will be installed as a part of the com- mercial construction after rough-grading has been completed. The major physical and engineering aspects of the proposal are outlined in the section titled "Summary" . The scope of the grad- ing .and the intended approach to landscaping and buffering can be discerned by reviewing the Grading Site Plan (see Exhibit H) . Rough-grading the site will consist primarily of stabilizing existing fill and moving portions of the higher ground to the lower areas. Although cut and fill are expected to approximately be in balance, there may be some import required to establish op- - timum grades on the property. Larger scale drawings are on file with the City of Renton. Because finished grades generally drain away from .the perimeter roads, it is not anticipated that there will be any problem in keeping earth and runoff within the bound- aries of the property during construction. However, temporary detention/retention ponds and hydroseeding may required per City Mining, Excavation, and Grading Ordinance requirements. A portion of the area in question was previously designated for commercial use by King County, and was so designated on the City of Renton Land-Use element of the Comprehensive Plan at the time of incorporation into the City. Evidence and arguments were pre- sented to the City of Renton in support of an expanded commercial area at this location. In resultant action, the City of Renton enacted Ordinance No. 3112. This Ordinance revises the Land-Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan to the condition as illustrated -5- • • • P-- -- q • , 1 . _,„r? .• ...., . " , , . . • , , • , , ... • . . ... •:., . _ _. . . ___ . . . , - • , , .;• • .• ,. ,... , , .. . s4.LOLA 4 uvwy 4 4711.14 ?Ns" a uu Ts ` w. 440 {00 aoaoo L. 401 • t• . • - .( •• •• ! a1a ---= _ i •w l 1 -iI ja0 ` I d 1n 1 I "' N a 1 1 •y9 iII ; I o ceure.e our. g� 4&e�we,e_em¢P. .z . 1 391.0 391.0 • • ' tta • I 34;• i rat$ °a' r [;�_ 1, •1 fir.. .� �--- z • • • • 0 a . •I I b R 3,- , co i ' 1 I 1 . . . o i2a` o ¢ wgl acs I //1 / ' ® o m N I I 'A )9 ® my °n_ t / • [- ttir �.r.- I "mod-iaT? j /i o UU o ev a�.n' ��v U III •f �e ii' (2 o • .!.'! t! ••”• °'r;:.;••Y' .,`�<,..1`� ?,,t'4.1..v.,.. • v. �•11'• t':" .`f':,?: ' s '•1.1!�Ad,•1. 1 P.a 1`tgf0.l.. :t•• '. k. .,:: 'iat.�:'i,4�i•1:".3!1•2.,.GSit:'- .�' i.•l'••. � ?:r,•:�f'_.�.!J'+Z :�loldill�t..,rrL�Ir:.n...d1':•r7r!:-i0,a! '.t" d- (PRELIMINARY) EXHIBIT "Ho on Exhibit D. Present zoning is G. A specific rezone request is pending. . Its approval would designate a portion of the prop- - erty as B-1 (business district) and a portion as R-2 (two-family residence district) . This conforms to the intention of the revised Land-Use Map. By special permit, up to eleven dwelling units per acre can be constructed in R-2 zoning. . EXISTING CONDITIONS & IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENT Earth: A review of soils types as published by King County, Washington, indicates that most of the site is Alderwood series (Ag C) . The Alderwood series is made up of moderately well • drained soils that have a weakly consolidated- to strongly con- solidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. These soils are on uplands. They formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. Slopes are 0 to 70 percent. The annual precipitation is 35 to 60 inches, most of which is rainfall, between .October and May. The mean annual air temperature is about 50o F. The frost-free season is 150 to 200 days. Elevation ranges from 100 to 800 feet. In a representative profile, the surface layer and subsoil are very dark brown, dark-brown, and grayish-brown gravelly sandy loam about 27 inches thick. The substratum is grayish-brown, weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till that extends to a depth of 60 inches and more. (See Exhibit F. ) Al- derwood soils are used for urban development, pasture, timber, and row crops. ( Part of the site holds Shalcar Muck (Sm) . These muck and mucky peat layers are found on the lowest portion of the property and typically have a combined thickness of 16 to 28 inches. They occur within a depth of 32 inches. Thin layers of mineral soil material also occur within this depth in places. The extent of this condition is being evaluated by a soils engineer. This area of the property will be filled and compacted. . There is the pos- sibility that some undesirable material will be exported from the site. A topographical survey reveals that most of the site lies between 390' and 400 ' above sea level. Extremes of topography are 385 ' and 419 ' . ' -6- • Z :1 Io \c a 1. o I1o_IIoc -_1 L_� �- i-• Io °7 19 " 5T . - . - if s.. 9. % 997 P 95 169 'C..8 40 3'7 L�5 ,Sf Igo g 1 ;i'149e 70 �'�A1 36 N , Nor 8S 86 IN tp 4 �4 I 1►1 (P`AT �4GgV r rt.AT \.79 78�7.7 76 75 P 4114P4r i® 3l ,_ - II 1T N14N 49 a`yC �, 1 :::... 5 ......... ... .go WH amilli �•'��41 r+1 14 8 at O - - L jj 83 82 " 54 53i'S4 51 5° P�®pin®� G IL f.....- 1 1 • ��:R D 'mot `� ix 4 1 4 ; : II j I S. I07`, -1.., r .rqv �`3n+: 0' k,"i y; 1 I Z 314 S16 78 �JI10'11 12®m r ir5€ , 1Sl16 1l ie 5 1 4 3 2 l p$ sA 4r+✓ 4 + E"1 4 R Irt > rt 2 - aX1 %..et ,, �\ c t l,* yy 'y $ yy( Lti L• L ... ::• ':°L r{' L " c2i•�' ` . �• "•},,��,, ia'. ��,+. ,:, ,,`f Y., 'L 'i yQ s • L eL n h. •L �y S•E'm :,:,..A L. 'f M Sx , D. :L. •:L°: 'L ,�""`• f:.� ? ;"� u.�:t; .1 w� .5Y T ". . Sa'84 G t• L ▪ L a' .i r.: {{•• .r.. �t;� R14 f: •• LL • :r rr :tiff`' ▪ Y, s •,. - es �t� . •' r �,.. } io A%� �,t �/)��r� $c'�ae 7,v'.."tkrt x}f•Y�-"+i � x.y ' •%� { •,� .t r +tw vE, "" 4. a3' o! .E a '''1• L,Y +µt }.,'.'•••'•' 1 X e `ry,''y' { �.yre {T tea: 'r 1 " a 1° .10 , � d. n tnRnC". ''7 p .. raw , rt ••,'•] f�, : $"J N tt lh rya -�.. ry4�E7t� 3 +„ S a .M <` „�,,;tn fi r} . yv. .Jr'Mt i� 2i-t.`;K • / z. 1$1. 17 ��,' -drt'� r�' r u. , r ' v.v.' Y - 11t! i �� ' �• .':V L, N ...5.5... S4.t ass � ' •} y /./ ../, , • ate,-.w�e.� t" ,.�t-s.. ti▪ C. .▪L. :.`•:I:�;`�>' 5:��i�:i;i5' �`+` p�' .',. afrr. h•SriA °.V{r r•}• �.E'':;:•}i:;5:1}:i}i<}}:•:$: >}i': >4:4}'.>` .. +i'alki , .1„ '•::i{•rf{� is{:is:i»ii5i ;6.` 1 n: '„, -TN• r T a , •L:C,• r r ia i•}>ii:{•Yt Y..;}}' LV, s .r _______ ,.1,,: iiiiiiiii:i:iii:i:umm: : iii .. ,___....... ,,, / ../ A, e «:•r r ... ....,„ . . — ,...:.:::„..:....„....„...„:„........:its„...„...,. .:. .-.N., , ___ ______ _ _ __ • _ __ _ i ,_ ....:::::.:;:.:::. 1..*::::.:„...:,:::::,:c., . . • ii . . • . , .%::::.:::.:::.. .. % ......,„.„::„ ,. , , / / .,.Q.::::,:.. .,:::.,:.0.--. • , . . . , , , / . ,i,:,. .::,,:.% .,...,.. , . , • •• , . , „ / /. , , __ 0 , . „ , / . , ,.• . • .• .. / , . 1 • • i • _i_____ , • r / / ' , HAZEN SR z HIGH SCHOOL , , ----r- „,., \---,---T-TuTZ," i -.: T I • r 1_ • . 1 y,/j �,� �• r it�µ______- 1 5T. g • _ ' -- - �// _ // • • // • .1 .3,,yOe. ,"o d c ;':` ,_ 7.1 IB I9 ,m;21 : :21i. : - —'1 ' / / 7] '''''. yi �•+'l '-' no 4 29 4,7 : 11 J —I I / • / / N.E ._1 3 12111\j3, _ 24 >r �i i / / / I 1 `�-• 1'TIiIF1�.47 3.t j3 3j ,•Y. “Ill. Ij , i / //�// ` ' CIO''" % PLC'-.a, Ir -, I. . " Co.Q. 1 Z,s.;'ru: 819 (Io l 11 .Qu, L. , !�•----- tiJ / /1/7////1/::/_/ / ,, ;' 14i., > f1/./ / • .'• BINDLE -F.AP11�Y �• �.•/..ws • I-OW 1' N519Y M1.91 FAMIw CITY OF RENTON • -. LAND USE DESIGNATION ME MEDIUM P $HfY MUL?I fAMILY 7 . In : PER ORDINANCE # 3112 . • GOMMfRLIA9. -- EXHIBIT i1D" - • eii. Pu8I.IG/QuASI PatiLI` • • ?1,.F"�'— --L -1-.. . •.'' , `y�, B eD C� \./ . . . W 1li; 1 32.30r, ''L� f,- 1. i • I a x \\qVIlie am"••`� i i r I TT \ Jhi — irlm,„ ... , \..,,..41,New_ca • . • ..t,93 • . 58 " v 'a , e cvl. JCS ' :) . . �w; e '`S"`� _ Bh. \•I :. A9C I \ I . \-- BM -BMA aBM • C • • rI.r: 690 692 78 I •. BMA � � n.3 / •�` \ 1 A9CAl •1 •\ ( \.., .1 . � ... • Be‘C%%) ; . _• • 9 k, Ufa �, 34 I )404)442 AT.. . • EvB I Be EvC• 9C j Cv�. • • �� • _ •• . :fDB--- - Z �,,�1- L • T. 24 N. • --/ . BM 3l I ` >it .- ---- -- - T 23 N. r A3C .F--r'' . . �• ,SA. r h C. - AgD .�I . ' BM 1\ • \ • • ‘..? 4 � a �' • , A3C i••• •-p; s;;, Itittill I..• .• t: " iti 1 • E • Ate,` vD Trader ark _ 33- -, o- i II r��•�� -/'� -- ---T... Iii; 1 /.�AC !;: III d� 'cr�" �J+�..: BM t .I: ;"..k.:" . 0:'': et //, Renton quadrangle) i 10. ''�� •" 4 7`'30' ]22°07'30" -i w Excerpt from SOIL SURVEY _ .- ---___... .- -- rs _ - King County Washington la SOILS TYPE MAP iti J1. • • > M • p �, •. EXHIBIT "F" • Water: A study conducted by the City of Renton Engineering De- partment projects that stream flow under conditions of a 25-year storm would be 91 cubic feet per second. The plans for storm water control and ducting are to be found on pages titled Utility Site Plan (Exhibit I) and Water Retention System (Exhibit J) . The method of handling is to use surface-ponding plus a series of catch basins with controlled orifices. These controls will release the water into the culvert and thence into the downstream flow at a rate not to exceed calculated existing runoff. Design of the system is for a 25-year storm. Domestic water with ade- quate quantity and pressure is available to the site. There is a 12" water main in Sunset Boulevard, and there are 8" lines on either side of the property (see Exhibit I) . • Flora: There are no crops on the property and there are no unique Species to be, found. The approximate northern one-third of the site is existing fill material with no vegetative cover. Other portions of the site contain scrub grass and vegetation. The .areas around the existing single family residence consist pri- marily of vegetation introduced 'to the site by man. There are five mature cedars and two good-sized fir trees on the site. Initial studies indicate the possibility of retaining a couple of these trees. In any event, there will be clusters of new evergreen plantings installed in appropriate landscaping areas. Fauna: The land has been "cleared" for many years. It is adja- cent to major thoroughfares. In part, it has been used as a pri- vate, smallscale pasture. There is no evidence of any major wild- life species, although it is probable that small birds and rodents exist on the site. Noise: There will be a certain increase in noise associated with construction and with operation of the shopping center. There are no plans for any industrial or manufacturing uses. Equipment utilized in construction and operation of the center will fall within the standards established by Law under the State of • -8- • • •••• •: •• '. - -• - .•• . --•••• ••• •-:-••• •;• •. -,..••••,-,y-....-.--- ,-;.•:i1.7""•74::.:•'•.' ;,..!;','"•-r7".'":7•:'''''-",.71,t7:?,:.•.•'"...7"-.':"••,...,.,-. ... ,.....-. . • • ..... ....;.::. ,.... , .. . . l .• . - • ... . .. • _ . • • • • . . ..—_ ...L____ _. .. - — ,_•. •- • x - -- • -.•i_..7/.._ - • • --1--.t.--7 , • .• .•... • - ' • • I ' ; -. --••• . • • .. _ • i - • • 4 uvtuy . i 4,Litj'Al154 L - 1 kit.tot.14 . _. uurre, -4 Lo•11.101 , .uurre, ! UtJ rft. . 1 • . g _.' t • ..--- 1._._±_,___I. • I I ,.• . ' • ..... .. ,. ' 1 •. .. . . . nrS..•- '''.."'- - --4- - - ..••.•L'c c'_- --_-s, ) • • . . - i, . .....ki in iw.,..,, •01.14.44-mt.Om.. --V1 t.1/1X`earLo6 h.iLf..6 ' i gmstAalsr . . . ,--- - • , ....... r . ,•,..,,.--, . -I • ; € . • I 1 I ! .76 . . . • ' ..I I I : : • -,3' 8 J ..1 d - cur - Dei., 051:02t- gwww,Ler-elvet. ta 1 1 , 1 li ; • e ..--.:-- 1• g 'v 1 ; _. ! . I I r. i, '• a.• , ... , .• i. sl 73 I: A ...... s- • - • . • I - •.2 - ---• • i . --_______ 2 r-47,-..- ,77- .,:tr--7- 7— 1,7,47- -- - •1 . .-- - ; F"' 1 : I: - • • Z I ' . . . 2 I II 1 . .• < •46 i . ' 1 .1• . 1 •g . . > I r • 1 '.1 . . 2 I I I: . ! I ;: , • 4 w -! I . '' <. 1 / : ! -,..!..j.:,i.f4.8. • "' ...d t ot •41 - , ' I • 0 t ; . , •----"--.... . . . . : :;: • • I . • • 0 '-o l• i • I lit.{ , 1 • p ,_,,,,., 1 •. • y.,-- C.,---- .e;.,.. - . ilei _.,,,,, ..p... if).-- -- ,),-) 0 ,,,• ! ' ' . '* ".1 . , to•,,. „----' .1- • , • . ,,..t..e E . : tuo..D az,•z, --, .---4,b • . . . . 1 .....i. •• ; ...-.:1 , ko a- • I ;0 • ,..,.•,,,.,„I .. ' - . . . .... ...._ . .1%, • e)-41> - e> • . . .. . 11 i , -loll 1 1 l.'----- . .. . _ . Of- VI'. ‘4,.°•‘. .. . . • ..• • . .. • nd NI • i • • . . .. . .. .... . • • :••• . t • A , ,,...........<10, „a ..... . • . (1- •. I. 1 .1 I _ .. . . . !) IP' ..'..1_1.11.11..r.r V.. ...: ... .. • , ..—a . . :.- ' — .. • ' .. .....--'''.....--$7 . ' . ' 'i.•• • 3 r -....„) r I i .; , • - 4.......-,s; ••:- • ,.....„/ . , -517 t -PL:11,1-1_ . • •• ••. 1 I . . '• ..., • / - . • " • . . . .. • - - •• . ••:. . T . ,, ..P , • , . . . . • • : •.• . • . 7----6--- . .ATCC.A'Wu:.• • • L . I • .. , :...,---- 46---.r. .. ek.aimay db.:mu.' . . • • • • IL. .. .:,.......—.--, :. •svmg._ . : , : . • .. :. . •....,„'..: ,...../......•., . .11_, .. . . ' "'"'"••' ''"'!' ' '.CI.B.YE.L.T. . . . ' ' ' ' • ' • • . . . ., • • • . r•-• • • ' • ' ' ••'' '':-.7 : • • • 2 D ; , • . ... •. .. . . • • . . . . . • .. •. .. • .• . , . • 1 • • . . •.. •. • . .... • : . . • .. ' ....: ... . ".. / . :. ; J • • . . . . • ,.• . • • . . (PRELIMINARY) EXHIBIT "I" • \. \ \.. -VP GsjW eEoid- \ 1 A sT 'u2p�aa� \ `\�� • 5Ue_FIGC _E.TE1.11 10i_j POOID . • .. TYPIGLL• • f Y 1 • I 9 0 / NIgl1 waTEe. Lute ;CO a'E��o� so r // !oW Ws�r uUe u1sw1.. for G LF14 'OrT-- - I, , I EX1El O PIPE 65.041 Write u4t. ":0 OEVEDF11 on. ( ,rit.70.‘ J \. Mil a.:-.VE.2-177. • Ck l'�[.11 6s51a (4' ) / . Q; ff.G j ICDI•-J G b jG 0 ?^b511-i 4 OVEL FL01 EL I E.U1-101...1 fv F 4 .. I. e10f to %. • • 2, GVEZ.51ZE0 PIPES 4- C.4.1-C.H b Lob 11-15 10 7 9, 5UeFpGf: R71.1DIF4:;1 01,1 1aePHs._T PCBU11CL t-0r 0o g. Ioo7'• • "s 1=1 : so 1. Euy-cFP (C111T11..161) 1 it • ';'D PEEGU LO•r 1 rz .1 (E-Xf 7T1 N al) a - 5i-OZO V AT1✓E- IDE1611,-I 15 y'EdZ opTOzM OFCIFIGe.._ PE le• U VJ ULD f . pLn•TE- WITH b I10LE CJIZE.p "TO 17te14Li ZEQUIIZEMEITS • dLLOV/ED F/ -'L10&ap 0E7rE-1710I-1 F1221.4UL45 & LlMITCD a.FAcLJT or VJhjC2. WILL 5E AL LOW El? Tv PEECULL.TE. P1,cL IU..frO TL1E SOIL 1.T -TIt L11LlfJgct,P• d¢E45. AMODUT OF S Tu2STIO4 7v P . DETP MINED by Exlev714--46 So IL PEr2GUL•4TIO1.1 GAPAFILITICb. • • W&TE-? aET7_.IJTIO1 STEJ• EXHIBIT "J" Washington Guidelines for Environmental Noise Levels. Mitigating measures: construction noise can be reduced through the use of proper noise attenuation equipment on all construction related uses. Vegetation can be utilized to reduce noise levels in cri- tical areas. The Washington. State Department of Ecology has specified regula-. I tions relating to maximum environmental noise levels . They have classified various areas or zones and established maximum permis- sible noise levels. These "EDNAs" (Environmental Designation for Noise Abatement) are classified as: a) Residential areas - Class A EDNA b) Commercial areas - Class. B EDNA c) Industrial areas - Class C EDNA . The maximum permissible noise levels for these zones are shown in Table I below. TABLE I NOISE LIMITATIONS EDNA OF NOISE SOURCE EDNA OF RECEIVING PROPERTY CLASS A CLASS B CLASS C Class A 55 dBA 57 dBA 60 dBA Class B 57 60 65 Class C 60 65 70 Between the hours of 10 :00 PM and 7: 00 AM the noise limitations of the foregoing table shall be reduced by 10 dBA for receiving property within Class A EDNA' s. These noise levels may be exceeded on the receiving property by 15 dBA for 1. 5 minutes, 10 dBA for 5 minutes, 5 dBA for 15 minutes for any_ one hour, day_ or night. Light and Glare: There will be yard lights in the shopping cen- ter and lights within the buildings. The yard lighting will have directional controls. Considering the size of the property and the ample road widths, there should not be any uncomfortable light • or glare. In this area, Sunset Boulevard has 400 watt Sodium Va- -9- por Luminaires at about 300 ' intervals on each side of the street. Suitable landscaping at the site perimeters and within the parking areas will assist in mitigating certain daytime glare. Land Use: The area has been designated on the Comprehensive Land- Use Plan for commercial and multiple-family uses (see Exhibit D) . Present development on the site consists of two single-family • residences, together with appurtenant g structures. The surround-i ing area is mostly zoned multiple and single-family residential) There is a mixture of single-family, multiple-family and business uses in the area. Commercial uses are located at the other three corners of the intersection of Duvall and Sunset Boulevard. Com- mercial uses also exist at the corner of Union Avenue NE and Sun- set Boulevard, approximately one-quarter of a mile west of the subject site. Several large apartment complexes exist near the site, including the Honeydew Apartments adjacent to the Southwest corner of the subject site, and the apartment developments North- , west of the site along Sunset Boulevard. Honeydew Estates, a single family residence subdivision, is located South of the Honey- dew Apartments, or approximately 500 feet southwest of the subject site. There is an existing 30 ' road easement bordering the site and an existing 40 ' powerline easement, the north line of which lies eight feet south of the south boundary of the property (i.e. , the powerline easement overlaps 22 ' of the road easement) . An existing church is located just south of the easement, with low density single-family residential uses farther south along Duvall Avenue; N.E. A map of the existing zoning is attached as Exhibit E of this report. Impacts on Land Use: Approval of the subject rezone and construc- tion of the proposed shopping center will cause the 11 acre site to be converted from its present undeveloped and low density -10- ,- 1. 1 !...3_,- t. r[,•1 '1 • - __ i 1 . ,1, 1 ' f, .• . , A, = o � :r i 1" _ 800 ::: J R , 11 = — =-1 f • Li • _ '� 1 1 1 e` -- ~- _t'� yr^ ..I / �i 1•• � • - -„f am„r - 1 - 11 - — .•�'f_ tom- — T --- �1 ,i ' r _ r „�°`1./ r' .'?ter=i.� 1 1 � • — 6 lr� t31.r ILA i i I \�� e �-1�L�_� '' Z a :9.� ] '' i = .I Sf•'. 1.t 1]�,.,a_a_a•a , __ — 1 ;�-I'_1 •,S ^.. �., a bin ((I {L`•�'•/—] Wit. _ D,L�..#� , -19). ,.. ;il I ,-' - °. ,,, I ��-.. S 7•r•w:- i�_�—ice - - JY:'�io_ i - �i . _ a V",:.;‘,.‘y •� " �a , 1 4 an� •� + ig 37. 1 __.I .T.+ .�-: — (• r"1' w TT�- 1 _ 7 I • _'��1_l.�a' •,' ° •- '1 Wit*=_ -'- — --- _ �.j,11ii'i'T_I'f la c I a'a q, . ; — -- — =.S I ==- , . •I -�•dI 1. I I1 i T. i • I " 1`I'1�• •i'_ r, 'fi1ki [--=1—i • J` -1 1 }�`� ,_ -.7:1, :: , Qr.. ::)::.)-,N„'..--;A:r•-'4::31.i---44 i'-' � H — I. r -11-,741111.1 r } .1.1 I , I I SR-I _-- 1 ] N • 1 • - ! I I '3 i ZONING MAP ,;.•., : �• �� . , I CITY OF RENTON _ _- ?` 17, • I (A Portion of the Map �•�,t7 .. Dated 9/1/76) il_. . , I a • - ':E..;' pie I _.. EXHIBIT "E" _t-kv.. single-family residential condition to a high intensity commer- cial use with a low density multiple-family buffer area. This, however, is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan for the area, and the general development trends of the area. Certain secondary impacts may occur as a result of the proposed project, due to a possible stimulating influence on zoning and building activity in the area. However, the trend toward increased density and development in this general area is already established (i.e. , Honeydew Estates, Honeydew Apartments, Springtree Apart- ments, and the Glencoe Subdivision, and recent improvements on Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. ) . Mitigating Measures: Landscaping and site improvements will assist in reducing impacts to adjacent properties. Also, the planned residential four-plexes at the south end of the subject site and the proposed street will create a transitional buffer area between the proposed commercial uses and existing single- family uses. At the present time there are significant areas of land which re- main undeveloped. Traffic patterns are well established, and it appears that patterns are rapidly developing for a continuation of residential zoning and land-use on most of the land area of the plateau on which this site is located. There is, however, other commercial zoning which tends to be clustered and well separated. Natural Resources: Resources will be consumed as building mater- ials during construction, and as utilities in the continuing op- eration. Careful construction techniques and good design con- cepts will preclude any overt waste of resources. Explosion: The risk of explosion 'or the emission of hazardous substances is not inherent in the proposed project or its oper- ation. Design, construction, and operation will all conform to current safety regulations. -11- • Population: There are presently more than nine thousand people within one mile of the site, twenty thousand within two miles, and approximately thirty thousand in the general locale. Addi- tional information and detail are to be found on Exhibits L, M, and N. The population impacts: areprimarily related to the re- sulting demand for traffic facilities, public services and utili- ties, and the effects on noise levels, air quality and water quality. . These are discussed more specifically under the appli- cable sections of this report. Housing: Housing is mixed, with single-family homes and low to medium density apartments. There are some mobile homes but most are of conventional construction. The impact of this particular project will be to add sixteen (16) additional residential units to the locale. Secondary impacts in housing may occur as a result of higher density clustering near the proposed development. Transportation/Circulation: A review of the 1976 traffic volumes is to ,be found in Exhibit K. The shopping center project is bounded by two major thoroughfares. The design capacity of both Sunset And Duvall is 40, 000 vehicles per day. Parking facilities will be established in keeping with well accepted norms for this type of development. The land-to-building ratio of the commercial development will be on the order of 2. 8 to 1.0. The total number of parking stalls will approach one per 200 square feet of ground floor building area, and be not fewer than one per 225 square feet of building area. Metro now has bus service to Union Avenue which is 3/8 mile to the west. It is probable that service will be expanded in the future. The City of Renton has a current- year project for the installation of a 5-phase signal light at the intersection of Sunset and Duvall. The light will have an 8-phase capacity. The combination of the signal light and cer- tain lane modifications will bring traffic capacity of the streets and intersection to a level capable of easily handling the exist- ing and anticipated traffic (i.e. , at least 40, 000 cars per day on each street) , including that generated by the proposed project. -12- . • 4 • • in -1-1-31AFFIG TAI3ULrATI oN PAST `(l=Ahi - l c'7(p d • AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC V�� ~' • , 411;,,,.., 014. • (44.7, 740 aco/e) ii: 1 . • ../.... .......----:„.....,,,..- ¢2 titti '/• . (4) e;40 N / 980 •PApKlNCq STALE I_ 1 I- N W ro 111 • (Y ' -- -- - ir Ae W PRQPo5ED . A a S1-loPPit4 GEf-.ITEJ2, . vw •• ill W o - -- --_— —_— — —-- — --- — -- J d• u EXHIBIT "K" ESTIMATED POPULATION Population which would logically be affected by this project is to be found on the plateau lying north of the Cedar river, south and west of Cougar mountain, east of I-405, and continuing east to the area of lake McDonald. The westerly portion of this plateau is generally refered to as the Highlands area of Renton. The plateau includes unincorporated areas of King county. The census tracts which cover this plateau are tracts 0251 through 0256, except 0253 which lies west of I-405, plus portions of 0319 and 0321. A summary of estimated total population for the year 1975 has been extracted from data compiled by the Puget Sound Council of Governments. It is as follows: Census• Tract Applicable % Applicable Total 0251 100 4,308 0252 100 4,780 0254 100 4,586 0255• 100 2,819 0256 100 3,350 0319 75* 9,291 0321 20* 1,559 30,693 * Estimated by L/P Inc. Source: PS COG Estimates of population - 1975 King County, Washington EXHIBIT "L" tia�� = �. 1 — — -- — -- — — --- 11 suo ' A ''''''''."5"'"'""/-1- I -, % ? '.: (;'' ckte J _, .-,,/,,,_ 1,,si.: „ __, ,. /.1„. ......,....._*., ,.;.,..,--' , , ...'''.1 ..• •-s•-•-• •''`' 777".7 . r NO°. 'I:, ( ‘,O /... . . 1' -',.':!, ',•:' '. ' ",%I _.) --1- -t-P „. , /,,,,, , -,=....,,, , ,ssar . ., \L,,,,, �1 loon unh• r ��• ' , :--......,,:,-; -‹,,•'-' r.:•:=/,/j-- - - .„ L • • /.....+1\ / • _ � -' c.1 t!(( ly • 11 Vi TTT... ftko -+- -t- -4-- ti I • '1°.„,) ' r . ' I ' i. •• ,,...-• ,0.,,,141-.), . .0 •7'-•--N, ,,,_I -'.1 .,... — ., J . -• • PIPS4\ . • �` •' . •; I�; • ,om, • -+- -+-i _ t\i \. ' . --', / :1 -,•, ,.•.t,,,c.„.",,,, ,,`-‘,.,,,,,. _ . _ \\_\._. • i . ,„.....:,....,. , :.,..,-„,- 1 ' - ---,,,..' •--,,,,-• .• :,. .,;„,'''.;..: • CLL1iVV/1j I• '1•;, { �sx -•----1 ` r. �adx' ..`t -f- ~- '�- 4 '� I I / •, • �— �: 39N I f� Q 1 _ .__ _ _,, __,____.an _ •),.1,.:, i 3 C _l_ , ,•-� .-Ki.-.,. 1 i 2 F. ) 1 , `- • y ' • /•(_\YIII 11{1•• p �I { live( • I /r/ rF . ). . .. „. .. i ,,_ , �g/yy ' 'r ,. — J y 1 I' • • �lj••,, - _ . �,.) } . , ----] j1.?H•' „1 ' � / ' , : I • •) I 1,,, rit,li, , \r„, `:.k 1 Sma �'�'` p iii ' 1 �I / .�� ' ` �h„ } Crook 4.��'..a._ •L _Ai • I F j 'I~ I,'-.0..: '''' `' 1''.:2� I, , ,;lt r"" L1 .1" Il __•` ?,, — '� t' 1,. . / I l_ ► -1I/ or I 1_ l�_ y _ • • • • • • + i •r.l'�'';,,'i,:�l.dl` h '�.. . I 'h,/ , ��ca ' Ll I 'is �Y-. .xI1 . r 4 , 4 ' — •• � y - ' -l 1� _ ' •< .. ` . 1 Jj;-:' 'I1', . . I1 et' • ' ? ', .4 , ' � J� ' '1 i1 I , irk,,Av • Li... ){ I,Y `r , dl ' Ll71•�J 1:::;,,., , 1 3S_^ �/y .�1 �w�� yry _ • ` l, � n- 1 1 •• I •d � '• - , / � • 1. r " � � , I IC t,. 1.,I_ - .I ^f .,'', . .� {hul',' I/—IW l• v 1 •, , '.I • +'t!' : • - !+U' ~ `* t i • ,� .i. —. — ............—_. • /J ` �`,✓ :\''..... .Nt-''''„, ' —.p."_p.. .I - .�_- . p 4,,..: .S' Yf 4• ,II:,1" 't.:'11,.,,1 J.�y • -:Y 'i-C'.w ,,+Ix> :" _J1 + '.t., W - o,i...'" •.j ,A —• .- . '- , e,VR:`nM>k-=icw,��'. =• ,i•uo,nu, _ . .; i • I: 9 , 1 — _...— (— �I -_-,-. - , , - \. ,1.`•'cu..r•,. ,,,, .+iir•+ai.4,<`-. .1,i:d.:•rI 13',..r': ..I. -- " -•. ., ,/,.IN , • I ' •. , ,, • ' 1 • -_� • :. , • I, I ,I .1 f L• r • ... ,.e.+J^"1�N • V Sid . • \\--77•1 '. ) �'�J�, r'.- 'n►Ar'!'w,.�-- •I `� 1 I'i N...: y :�',•t,yll .c(y - �� ^.,''"r��"�I�•' .•, 1 ,° _... ,..,,, ' ..-✓ �,•�� ..rc—•—.. A 7 • �' ) 11^II%I I'II /� ` 'I C7ie eraG Choracteris i . vne ropuocallcrt: v./iv • • i ERPT) • • Renton Renton-Con. Census Trails tr Tract' Thad Tract Tract Tract Tract Trac; Tract Tract Tract Tract • 0247 0251 0252 0262• 0254 0255 0256 0257 0258 0259 0260 RACE AN penises 152 653 8 724 4'FAtfi 683 . 040 2 990 1 022 2 593 2 417 283 1 903 White 132 790 3 640 4 421 4 745 2 902 984 2 539 2 354 271 1 822 Negro - 20 25 14 26 46 27 14 17 2 10 - Percent Negro I i - 2.3 0.7 0.3 0,5 1.5 2.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 AGE BY SEX I Mete,64 ages___ I 84 424 1 044 2 180 2 252 1 4.95 521 1 207 1 189 151 949 Under 5 years 1 60 219 !6H 242 177 60 136 111 11 69 J 3 and 4 years 28 00 59 66 71 30 53 39 4 39 5 to 9 years 9 68 200 126 215 190 73 148 147 11 78 5 years 1 21 41 24 44 33 16 31 28 2 14 6 years__________ 3 11 48 29 43 37 14 27 38 2 18 10 to 14 years i 14 years 0 44 2741,3 162 180 187 45 122 137 3 76 15 to 19 years 5 25 162 187 247b 25 13 10 83 1 18 71 4 176 125 33 90 81 10 71 IS years - . 16 Years 1 8 32 41 31 37 7 16 16 1 16 17 years I 3 5 49 46 40 32 136 10 7 2110 2113 31 17 16 18 years 5 • 25 27 2116 3- 42 21 5 21 16 3 7 • 19 yeari I 1 3 16 30 30 15 4 22 15 2 15 20 to 24 years 8 16 134 105 225 88 31 . 125 68 19 91 20 years 2 6 24 36y9 7 4 22 17 5 17 21 years 3 1 22 32 39 12 7 16 11 2 12 25 to 34 years 4 123 291 347 358 237 90 248 240 24 125 35 to 44 45 to years 13 50 212 207 218 216 60 169 158 13 110 Years i 8 33 211 249 262 152 58 136 140 22 108 55 to 59 years - 5 78 172 105 52 32 49 49 11 58 60 to 64 years 1 4 5 • 50 116 97 35 14 23 20 10 47 65 to 74 years 3 2 44 143 99 26 17 24 27 10 37 75 years and over 1 3 22 105 55 10 8 17 11 7 59 • Female,atleget 1 68 418 1 877 2 325 2 548 1 495 501 1 306 1 228 132 954 Under 5 years 5 54 188 168 237 162 50 137 147 9 59 • 3 and 4 years 03 64 22 51 61 3 16 5 to 9 years__ 0 53 205 122 202 178 . 66 154 129 ' 1 69 6 years !I 3 10 44 22 42 40 40 9 2724 14 10 to 14 years 11 34 189 141 192 140 14 311 24 1 1 11 81 37 • 110 142 9 64 14 years 45 36 6 20 23 3 14 15 to 19 years 5 36 177 169 240 122 36 113 92 14 77 15 years__ 1 13 31 30 51 30 5 23 23 1 16 16 years 2 12 38 32 43 21 11 21 22 2 12 17 years____ 1 •6 41 . 30 46 28 10 15 20 1 17 18 years - 3 • 39 35 50 24 5 24 18 2 19 19 years 1 2 28 34 SO 19 5 30 9 8 13 20 to 24 years________________________________J 15 314 179 259 325 119 33 169 90 17 103 20 years 21years58 19 5 22 9 5 15 25 to 4 years 1 114 284 23726 25 9 30 9 2 25 35 to 44 ears 323 216 59 230 59 6 110 y I1 46 210 176 222 216 59 149 151 15 101 45 to 54 years 1 6 28 211 290 306 132 72 118 121 26 121 55 to 59 years 6 8 62 174 125 58 30 43 31 7 51 - 60 to 64 years 4 5 45 129 107 27 12 29 35 8 43 65 to 74 years I ' - 6 64 246 125 31 11 30 26 15 60 75 years and over 1 3 63 179 184 13 6 24 15 5 96 RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD I Al pumas 132 . ,S2 3 721 4 505 4 646 2 990 1 022 2 593 2 417 283 1 903 In households 132 52 3 721 4 453 4 640 2 990 1 022 2 593 2 417 283 1 747 . Head of household 37 242 1 112 1 934 1 650 866 320 949 714 122 639 Head of family 34 227 955 1 201 1 316. 785 281 666 628 80 500 Primary individual 3 15 157 733 334 81 39 283 86 42 139 Wife of head 31 213 868 1 006 1 124 719 265 547 583 73 436 Other relative of head i 59 392 1 693 1 371 1 788 1 371 420 1 037 1 091 73 642 Not related to head I S 5 48 142 78 34 17 60 29 15 30 In group quarters I - - - 52 200 - - - - - 156 Persons per household i 3.57 3.52 • 3.35 2.30 2.81 3.45 3.19 2.73 3.38 2.32 2.73 TYPE OF FAMILY AND NI'MOER OF OWN . CHILDREN AN families l 34 227 953 1 201 1 316 705 281 666 628 80 500 With own children under 18 years 20 163 652 509 709 557 166 415 401 32 241 Number of children 1 50 355 1 402 1 019 1 433 1 198 349 863 893 52 499 'Husband-wife familial 31 213 868 1 006 1 124 719 265 547 583 73 436 With own children under 18 years 18 153 596 401 568 508 156 320 379 29 209 Number of children 47 330 1 293 819 1 149 1 092 324 680 844 46 442 Percent of total under 18 years 94.0 91.4 89.0 73.1 76.0 87.9 85.0 74.5 90.9 86.8 83.6 fernlike with other mete Mad 1 - 2 15 32 27 8 4 14 11 1 ' 15 With own children under 18 years i - 2 9 14 12 5 - 4 4 7 Number of children • I - 5 14 21 24 9 - 10 6 - 13 Families with female hood i 3 12 72 163 165 50 12 105 34 6 49 With own children under 18 years l i 2 8 47 94 .129 44 10 91 18 3 25 Number of children 3 20 95 179 260 97 25 173 43 6 44 Percent of total under 18 years I 6.0 5.5 6.5 16.0 17.2 7.8 6.6 18.9 4.6 11.3 8.3 Persons under 18 years 50 361 1 453 1 120 1 512 1 243 381 913 928 53 529 MARITAL STATUS Mete,14 years ald sal ever 1 46 269 1 247 1 755 1 651 970 353 ' 096 827 127 724 Single13 43 . 302 466 355 199 66 220 186 32 179 Married • 32 218 897 1 076 1 133 730 266 590 603 77 465 Separated 1 3 16 37 38 6 1 29 10 2 8 Widowed 16 63 50 12 6 19 10 5 38 Divorced • - 1 - 8 32 150 58 29 15 67 28 13 42 foaab,14 years eV cad ever i 45 281 1 327 1 906 2 002 1 010 . 354 92S 833 116 778 Single Married i 9 46 241 293 343 167 50 178 144 18 125 Separated '$ 31 219 913 1 094 1 199 745 274 596 605 76 471 Widowed 'r - 4 22 53 38' 16 7 27 9 2 12 Divorced 3 0 119 349 318 49 16 64 51 16 142 1" 2 8 54 165 142 49 14 87 33 6 38 P-2 SEAT1[E-E09ERm, WASH., S S,A EXHIBIT ttNtt A collector street is proposed along the west side of the sub- ject site. This, together with proper interior circulation and traffic control devices, will assist in balancing traffic distri- bution and reducing overall traffic impacts. Public Service: The City of Renton has a well established sys- tem of public agencies to serve the community. This project is _ designed to serve the expanding needs of existing population, plus new population growth in the "Highlands" area of Renton. Although the shopping center itself should not place undue demands upon existing agencies and facilities, it is obvious that a grow- ing population does require additional services. Energy: Natural gas and electricity will be used in operating the shopping center. Sources of each are available at the site in quantities sufficient to meet the projected requirements. Utilities: Existing utilities, with some modifications, will be . utilized to serve the site. There is presently a 12" water main in Sunset Boulevard, plus three 8" water mains in the public right-of-way. Two of these lie within fifty feet of the subject property, and the third lies approximately eighty feet from the property. As a part of the proposed construction, at least two of these lines will be connected to create a fire sprinkler "loop" . There is an 8" sanitary sewer in Sunset Boulevard with an invert elevation which provides adequate fall to permit a gravity-flow sewer to accommodate the commercial construction. The apartment units will either be tied to this same line or to an 8" line which exists near the southwest corner of the property. At pre- sent there are 4" gas mains in 132nd Avenue and in 142nd Avenue. A discussion with representatives of the Washington Natural Gas Company indicates adequate supply, and that depending upon their calculations and forecasts , this` site could be served either by an extension of a 4" main or by a 2" gas line. Electrical and telephone services are available at the site. -13- Aesthetics : The entire project will be 'carried out with guidance and consultation from architects and engineers using the currently accepted practices and standards associated with high-quality shopping center development. The basic building will be of mason- ry construction with built-up roofs. The site will be landscaped and will convey a uniform architectural theme. Landscaping will be suitable to provide proper buffering of possible objectionable elements of the development including parking areas , loading areas, storage areas, and mass-walls of buildings. Recreation: N/A Archeological/Historical: There is no archeological nor histori- cal significance to the site. Schools : N/A Population Characteristics: A summary of the make-up of the pop- ulation from the 1970 U. S. Census data is to be found in Exhibit N. SHORT TERM vs. LONG TERM The proposed project is compatible with the City' s Land-Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan and is compatible with the needs of the existing community. The project consists of commercial construc- tion oriented to the streets designed to bear heavy volumes of traffic, namely Sunset and Duvall. Interior streets, building placement, and landscaping will buffer the transition from com- mercial to residential utilization of the land. The shopping cen- ter is expected to continue serving the needs of the community for a period of twenty-five to fifty years. The subject site is not uniquely suited to any foreseeable alternative land use. The pre- sent demand for such use would likely be met at another site, if not permitted here, with relatively similar environmental impacts. Presuming that the needs of home owners and apartment dwellers -14- continue in .a similar pattern to that which exists, or in a slowly evolutionary pattern, it is fair to presume that 'ashop- , ping center of this scope, with the facilities and amenities which it provides, will make it possible for people to buy the goods and services they require for sustenance and for the care of their dwellings. The manner in which adverse impacts will be mitigated is discussed elsewhere in this report. Obviously, cer- tain resources in the form of building materials will be irre- trievably committed to the project, together with a long-term utilization of energy. MITIGATING THE ADVERSE IMPACTS The principal adverse impacts are either in the category of water runoff, or the potential for constructing a project which is aesthetically. displeasing. As elsewhere stated, the project will be carried out with careful attention to good design con- cepts and with the counsel of competent professionals in their fields of expertise. The requirements of this type of center dictate functional design and a high degree of utility. None- theless, the design can be, and will be carried out with an eye to good architectural practices and with the utilization of land- scaping to buffer the site and to provide added eye appeal. The "do nothing" alternative would probably result in another pro- ject of similar type at a future date. - r -15- 1..-..47,-..--.,.0------__;;-.----,-, Ul g •,./ i .: c-• 74.2 .' '-'14.••11.,:.;,- ,'-'•-j-1 ' "'"-,7••••-:---‘-v •.- 4r-• °' ..// %__..1 .." 1! L.: `--------. - Nor..Tan Poi 4%: 44 A Paint Ne Suatcher ___Th__..4"..jr - liCII_11 ' ''''''''''' - .-:i --• •PT7eTtyrtt•IBM. Fiend _ '. Snohomish..-, ,o„ ( . . Hc,,,,j '..-\\s 1•...• . , \ Ponesalon Pt ,, Lp........,a ,1 ,33) V;...7.)._'. lir • 41, .5,sar .{_r -4L c, 51_112.te‘, .. 1.--1 , ."- ..,.-,..- i • ,-• , -\ .-Pti 3 • \ 1 . , - t .'-'‘' ,/ 4 rii- . ,• Hannon '1:121571H.:'./. .. p , 0„401 " Picnic • 1- / Ptic' \ I • a.' al sit.d 1 a v EJ R ,„-; • ill ,,,.. iN. „ ... 1 , "— _ „t • SalsburY ww,I Elton t- ', ..Nil. • •' .t . ../. I 04, \ A --. '‘' . . „, , (% Port, "".•2 1 i . Gamble . st \ Ead:th,d;\-..,_ _ r 5=,_.,•,,•„,- , --- ii t, A,' 0 : . . .__ , , co mc.o,o,--, , '- r,, J South Pinta ,',,''' 1, . \(,, /Colirj ,•i,„A c 17L-- _ Dathcact‘'`-- 3. 4'!"---11.•• ,a lf i.\ • 1 . r- 1 % •,, /4. Glenview 1,41uP ;1: --,_-_ ,7J— 1 • m.....,01-s• 'l --:7 ii IA• A., _, 4.../• (---/2.\-•\\ 1,_",c C.,- SE.!•-,7::--7,-1 sr.") ji .. IV ( n Pr,',. " ,,,.... - CO. ,'''2. r P0:11.1 1....... ComonuS.4i,,--•-, j,3 /' -7G=712 c.,-', -1.-16--- - i.., \ . _. r , , ,.„..,:,__ „..fiy, ., k . . U ji_____ -- -Ki ' ' 'nt ,-...-.,,;--2-??-rr'!- ',',q A jfil .90 0 Maltby,'4:11-. v, • . _ .....ng_sto,n,/‘...:.,w/.-o ri• ,...ii 0 1. Muntlake ' V, A' _ 11-k ' -7°'''' ,,,ojw. , -' O l' Terrace ' ",,•-•---,..„. i„. II I W Point Y 3 CD'''_ / -,/-1 i„,;(3—).._ i - 1 i,_., , JIN 1 F-—•—- - - ..-2---a i ,D,' 3 - --r.r---' ,.'--" //..n E-- -- i . .1 :.4i.i4r---lh------/I Brovr.s Po..7.-1 Er p,„„, i I ') .3 enmare'i • I. L.. 3 251---\---,.._7, . • 4 Botlie4. ,.....'1:7------LrAll D -,, .__A _10 Forest •,.. - 1125: 4ID '.- . '.;-;':••7 '-i''-'s-r•-•-:---if--ND .: • •wi.i.,--.,..,_,...,-'' ',I.,/-Pomt, I o.-.4‘,7,-k\, , I I Park ( / if IL 4-1 L•, .1.-Yriiair ;.":,V..' I di I - ' leer... ! ''" I CP..atan. c aii'.:;!':; !''. i 11 . ,_.^ leo t 4 isi;o1 ''''' 1 •2,-'1,1,..... '• •‘ / z ..,1;.1-.Lit r'-.`-/7- ti km, --:;., ,i \\ t 1..... '--___.-•-•.:'..Suquarnish SPi pangar ; 1 '.1 -..)) ‘309 '1;3 . ,!'-.-LF,.;•A7,,,,;;-.k 6 A 4, .'-`7?.< ,•! '',',,;4-.!‘.+_ -- ..f.%..al 't t AM 14.1-4-6?..-, 0'• & ,s,,,„..i, "",._4.--& f Foy Ilornbridg a'7,'t.' •Iir Col" IA''' .. --.4 2 tg ._11C1.. .. I ' 6 ,J• u=„ii_„_, O 3,-. 7 Keypad p,..2 Hook 0 , Cji ., /I Meadow •/.....1., 5 7 .5.j ...!\/ ' P al ':•,i- 'T:). ‘ • - : - ''''.. r :i_l 61 pr. Irk , r, - ;--,--7;- , I Bow, -1 P..' ', v".-..' 1 v avili.Ant •...4: le..v. ...i1';' , r,-.'‘-i.' - 1 .01 i-.5,-f-,1 113 1_ ,i 42;_,, A'"'N ' 1 V --g811 v--I I U.: ]ii:ip.t ', t I 3 2149 '"'..-01 i,ivr .lie: ..2,,,, \,Redmondl _..,,,, :5"-'2.---------;jtj)118 ' . -1,-----,", 5,,I. n r A_Rolling Bay-- II t/MEM' 'i' • .•'---'-• _...,/,',7,,,, Kirkland 9 ... —rgie,-/y , .___ crownsville,-• BAINBRIDGE ,I -..-sg Shit Potot Went , .,a,..,-, . - 1.,,, - A=.,,,,,;,-,,x ..,,,, '.--0 -----a ..,rj !—.- (5)'\ '. iri. „ L nr,s..xy.,,,,,..L.: '--- I—r:" 2 Pct.tht '..r•.'4...',1‘'. 'Pr , 1:-'ktil.,.. _ ___. • • I- 1 In I.. ,7/1 , t, .•,.. Ivy,,i. .44,b,„4...?:-Irk•_,' , ' • ,,,,,,,,n „ , ;3.;...,. i , I. -. ‘, Pt pt. ? N. •., 4.t ' Hunts Li // /Silverdale r-,-,/. Uni. .53-\ii-L'AN-D-,,,---... L L -g II • - . .Ft .._,,,•,45_,-iur,,,,, i---)),,,....,.„,i vs, - i 7 2 ,, ec.va , riii_: .co,_. S: •a.,,1."ig , . / CO. 11';'- I :7-7:"1, -„,,,^ to, 0 •,1,,,,,:,I '.;.i'''. e ep,„. • I,, 71 ,1Y1'1,..' ,;,t- ;:dk... .--a;-;'--i-,-: -•!,:!..-JF;,. -:. llsosOd 7_1 ii-f-,i..,rin c—,;;;;;„`"-.-1---fe•e.f..r....2s, '•---141.-' r, ,,E medirIM,,,ii.-",- -,--f-(9id. nnt•c) t _ •,,.,„ _• i pi Port Blakely . 3 'f' -•,1• n Hi-Li-i7 Pt White . r."3 t ----- - , ... .-.. h Seattle, v.ti c. f i: •I.-- •1.tf.i..._,,,,t, •,• 1 .c.,;,.. .,,,-./ ! . . iii, -,..' 'ZIA- • -4 u ...--uto,,.;;".,..,- " / 93'77:•72.-N7 '20-f•1 %. - Tyi-j----7.-;',8..‘ ':•••1,1s.1..'NI,OkavIl if' '*C'14;•••• .3°'1P"' ,' -','45/1 \ t,v'''• -';`:','"'" '' , <- .ii r .. , 7An..,,:x„A __,-- • ..;1 remeqo 1-T.VI , • ` ' mrft,'-!'"•---Alki •..„ ___.-,,pic. ... //On .. \ Benn.PLI._./..Vil..._--.--/ Po.ni -,* :-,..rj.r;s: i' si . Mercer , L----'.4! - 4!..1 CI! P7Tr'r. ,.I L \r ,Oia-7,,e Pt :,f,:70::;:'" i, -y _1 / , i - -- Island eiii4Searr;e' 7:1.1- .1's••910,,,; go: s• **tY.. ,_/- stga -No•‘...„, „, 1". -if .?.'''' 0. . --< - . — •24,,;,,,,,,,,, .. cliir a q Manchester J ‘ • P°" . Colches4r .1:4: • '' !,. Orchard:7W, 'i'yr Nati// '''' 2C141a7 '• .s._1". '‘ .1'‘. • fi:,/, t= a•n• sE 6orit ‹..... SUBJECT • _ . '''" •""'"'''‘ n li,!:-Ntn, ',„.„,%'s,:,,,g. ...1, .,7 .. :.. A • . reek '' . . -r R 0 Gor,tir , ALI .p( ' /• 0„,,„ --- w.,.,.. Ve,9. 0 ,-\,-,'. s..th Pt 47. ---13.Y, _----------•- auP-.4 1.__ - .• ', ' r c.„ .il t,...O x- il „, ----- L, .°P-2._it? rCZ._. lob ,;Soutnwarth vVashon Heights Pt t . • t r ., .. .„ • 1 _ ,, , VO .•' 2 . ,,,,,LT,,,,,.,,‘ . 11" 417. 'a • .. . ' ii,i;nomw ,p z rri I ....) 5 _ Bethel , • / (?? - • )__ IF 1),t-bNyNk•-••••x7,5,....;•:„.' , ;.•,;(,,,„ ,,,,,, sr: _ . ) • ‘ .... ,_...— _.,•‘.7.-.Si__IT '[-_-___I-.--....:., - . ,u;-„,,ir. , ., It Ill_a_ _. ri,---":"..1 , poPe,iz I II;\. i• , Int B.•sis - A bre.r'_. .8 5,.5 j7 lar(1) .- -• . .:....'"..• ,./..-• TO r - ----....2.•,,..7 MULLS.. -ISM-. 6- F-}J / — -,E7P° ,---fiL ,_,. , .. 1,0[4, / :6,2 vA,Lsi,os,jr d /., .. _ . 40 S 2:. le ..! ,P ' 1 EP—, id 1 4. .., r • Wi 0 0 ••••. '"• "•.• 7,- -: 'r-;-?-I.'.F--;-;1:flr::::,, Pool!rully , ..,i. i, 6-., _ ..-,) al:: -.0 • ,-• . "'''.- p __. ----, C..._.'Vash;i 5, Valhon j • Center Normandy Park .k.X., . ',L---2•/21::/ fEt-' sda---._..4 6'l'i`\;,-- -••-=',(1;i ' ir ( IL,E,,1E,,,,A ST • 4215'!1'"r" /,. I 11 . ,••7,1-/-1 /C1---ic ,„. 0 -- - IL_ i jil :. 'ISLAN---01;r1C"Fr ': H PI Heyer C.," sitl - 's'C-5 P 2, II-----' ,j1 Z'''-] • c.= _;-----1_-___I. . . .11/(1 a /IL_'t",i;Inereste svr_Rymy.r..r"=••R L'ortage - ••-• •-' -- . ' -I'•*='-'--a--- .i.-1 ''' a i 1-- ripa_-_---: , --,1,-1,,,, ""i 171. • 1 1 St ,s la ,,•,.,,,,,,,,_., (D'i,l,v. " .:9 fit_l il ?'—'. •:• .r 4..,,.,,,, CD ,)/ pur-1--; .1 :.,:t• .11,, CND-32- / ' -n-''- .T. RobinsonDea „ 1 T• 21 Ij•'• Wr' '1 --1111,1j—FL'iLer—L—._r)— ..1.... - eil—R ,_--- Point Zenith• ,,i 3 fr. J,KefiL,- I'L'i--1 --ti--- .--- -.- ' ' • ji1-0, . . i ' E .... -'WAUfli ' ac Point ' 4 u v• . ,14.1..... / i Dockton M./.1.1RT. SaiNwarn 4, , . r.I 5'6 i'--° at L-_,F----7(-ii .7- ..• ,_,..• 1 . / .1. . • . 0--__ • ,--- 1- Ilp,..---, Allen 4• , . .,, Pinar • 1----1 , 5 Cr\_, • - .it_ii, i-'-'J liter ,4 SW'I. -'- . Gig Harbor tt i'V'ileouNaZil F' .4.!.;-s•CM.' q _. . ...untie .-- 'if! r ih•\ i 1, PoInt wl ..,, • ,7,nc. .,5.1 Appal • 0" \ P C"' Jt_-__ il-_. . ). D.h8 _,-•,_,_ . ORIENTATION TO ti"--—-p' c •1 1._,,__, ,•, ...,--I rim. ----.. Pato! ..i• (1.< I. '\'', 'Frt,tosoy ' ''''"'''' Federal % . it 3.1 ',..c.--..r., ' _,,, ,..,... Roston Britb'sw:t ic..;•8.tf.,.1?.' 7‘71k4k.I.,'.1 1 • Way a nia;fr.' ''''. ,0 PUGET SOUND COMMUNITIES 3 Ervi) 4r) n 'i Arleta ,,,, 1 ii 4 \ - - - - t l''4 ''=--=-1---=''\ 4.''' .1 ,..,.. ) C..4Z.V4 *.'''P$C, 1- i.f C__ __1:1-r.^ ' ''' 1 .v-• 'i 7.•'.;• 1,1s F-..-1,-,:- "? tr-?,'\,'' T. riji, II I tl' RENTON, WASHINGTON G.---n '' '''' -(=--9 _ ,-,1((-_--- ,Q.nal SWC SUNSET 4 DUVALL a co ma. ...• --:, :.7 , - 9 5 • — " - _ J. Fs,.rerr .., 4 •\ J ;\ / .-f_ 1 .j. . 1,...-:.-- :1/4..•, ..;,--1 - , ,• \ ••.,V / , aclilc '•••• . 4- .. _ -' \./.. 4 - - Ao. . EXHIBIT "A" ,.....,...—, ._. .k....,, F.-.1-_ p, r........, :tr,. I "'„,„. ,.•.„ 01 r- - • te-r .- A r.-1 's i , -,-7.; ,--7----:' '• N l6Tn 5 yQ _ SE earth w7, ~L` I I T'' t I NE 16rH Si S Al PL a • ]TT SE 109 .. SC SE 91H rN 'IP'• rS ~SON I 9 J • Z .99TN gr •• u feprE R O Sr IL-- pL 1 SE 90TH♦ • .� n a0 LJ 90<0 I t TA!' • 1 gt _ i SE SS C L� I SE 91ST ST SE R15r SE 91ST se 97h. H • I ST ST N 12N0 sr I~ Zr .. I ' r 1E "EID ii .NENNYe 115T ,,_-----Sr---- F sl I INTERCHAN It SE9=IIG i r [F6 5 St F * M•r 96TH \ 1 „ KEN NYD•LE SE • Y•EEFY ^ }'ELEM EN iw Rv 3Z 33 _ _--_ " Ro+D b II �' N�2BTH s *SCHOOL NE MTN ST _ T 24 N-R 5 E WM 33 34 AEI NE 5 4 I�= SE 96TH PET 23 N-R 5 E WM 4 3 .J Ely (P.tY O Z I a M1ySE`9d1M = Sf 56rh •N 26T r. ST SIERRA HEIGHTS Sr •• 1,,,,11.61.6 ,IJVVY1 �< r M^ "i 99TT ELE SCHOOL SE 99Y.z., Z P1111N NE 2STN ST L Z• ~+<H /••' l Try7� ,�, SE IOOTN ST GSXi NE G.V 2.fN ST dl � I <.f' _ f00TN�o • m u N 24r ST \ a MST NE 24TN ST SE 100TH el ST s,SSE 1001,R311 Z. I NE \ s STD- :i Z SE IOISr• ryE taf tI SE 23RD Sr SE�10lN` sH 9T iL3R. . . z I] '_ (_pw'E ME 2200 =T�g y < SE 10]RD ST w~�T,�S Vn • a _ E. M F6.[ h Z < L E'e•::: g _ _ SSE'-v 10.TH ST S 14 LOTH ST u NE 20iN¢ u °> Sr ` PJ \ E 1pST14=E E2 s ST O r ` rZ L [ I9TN ST S L t ,T+ M M F(�) M'P5. I SE 106T.- ST 19TN �b", - ml41,TECT— I r E 10=� NI;LCRES<T nE1BTM < Yi oL ST Or SC @ SLI r I ST 3rs Lar P hF (PvD J �i` NN O 0 A < —• �lr'i 16ry� 1 NE IITH •l 3M.SMBN r�C 615E t01TN gT + ' �aggl• y U'.S` I NE 12TH - I Z NE 1,N N 5T SE 102TX 0� � N < 01 ME; :IIt:I1L.nlU n T J Sr J \\ _ E l6rH> ST ..1,� TARN <IzrN Sr r +i 1.. 0.0/,0 \ • W a z y i '•R dr ur, . i i e 9" z 900 IsrN>< sNGONM Balk O (,\ Luz Zu m :!';i_�V:•I... E O O <I \ .S` ;i '(PQs s 4 l\ <] 5 MCNNIGHT • < ST 0 voE 14TXg • I NE 1,91 ST .,, JR.NIGH Hta ITTH ..Reser Iri ,,,sr ` �L PLI•SOM /Il aii (�) \5S ) ••I SCHOOL si 9 5I .� a �.�.� It.'. L u < < Library.. Ji 6' o iO It 1.. 4 3 SF E:C �,;� it; NE 12fN FJ 4 ST y ] E NE 12TH ST I. H A dI �`<21> 8 9 - •,,E i::III r' <i 9, 10 I OLIVERM. AZ sE11xrNvE `bYf ° P al `N PL W E PE z < SR.HIGN =E. \ O• afiee M..`` NE IITH i u"r EMIT.'' 1 E Z SCNOOL :®H� , f aE l L 01. E < 3 (i V` a o'<NE IITH=Cfr 5 �J.SO I :zr SE IldrH i Z 11TN > / 9.,\ 1 9 u ¢ 2 NE IITH PI 1 _}~u-u _ _• 1 r �R� M o N MP RENTON - °NE ST HE`II ,�. ;° sr�W I Z �.® A ME IOTH PI. d Z IOTN � '9 NORTH RENTON W = 'HI-LANDS Z� o"•[cr n c z L cl I Atnlet0 Will lei O •° INTERCHANGE O NF z 'e r� NE 101,, i\ ?W O Emits' M a \r 0 IOTH PLa-� hJC® , < u hF IOTN EN 1 • iL<Z i lZ JJ gE lI6TI�Sr V y SE Z E NEu IOTN 5! , ""sr: prH a NE l{�OTH ST Z°` 1 . ST IOrN ST < _ _u� H) NE 9TN., ^[ i\\\' _ 2 L W 7 I �- yy W hr Z 9I� a•l iE1e t� Sr O a 9!N 5T o r 1 ]L H�SE>'l ler Sr _ mO �I Po.a^ 405 I 9rH zr ,,,,,,lip W�;<5® NE z i i ~i i a z z hF vrHr Cr IlKi�s'LCITY LIMITS . y x$idle n p y"' �' HOMEY DEw-1 ‘ 9OO Z ", O j ♦M rt < 8G O `f,.'1,♦ ELEMENTARY iuL�' � O V BIN P L >t Dept.01 �' � < ` nE 9rH r.,S„Y...v..�1 ry 2 a NC BrH gr < <O Motpr":c71ei < NE BTN PE: •'� ':E =J BTH ST SCHOOL I < -4—N I BTN Sr\ NE i F W •Muaeuml ; W < ST SE 120TH ST - S - - I NIGHLANOS sla 6' J 9 v `j �_� Weft ELEM z ryE BTN s/ NE rTN ..1, Z l S SE 1213T ST °]r' SCHOOL O. NE 2TH. p TTN C? O ST _ 1 o NE i �� z i SE 1.3=4 ZNEi•• r., ° S- O NErTX ;SMP.. ST \ < N . ,I.� NE 6TH ° ] .9 M aNE 6TNI `\ NEmWis,,NE FERNQ,4'r Z i,. < O 2< ey6TN . R5 PE< Y- 6TH < NE °1 S < t. L O<LI ICr NE LN 6TH r i? NC <• 6TN SE J:•�iN�4I: •t I in hm erh< 9" i << .. W IPvt) _ _ _E N Oat z O N N` NE m 51X _li^1`. ° Z 1 IPeD /J�L LOP= Z Z ^ Z FOUNDRY ` /`//0PN' or'�T I. T' „ _ < ..< } 4. t.S N RENTON 'I . ' e 0rMOS00. f• Cpp'f? P•N 9 rN a L ~�¢VOir' i - WOUr.SEq 4IH •Sr 5E� 9 NE 4fM - L Sr 9/6 NE •TN 9 _105r l SE I 12BTH Sr a 6r __ i. • d _ z s i ° - : Cmz I 16 15 4 wRION L z l6 Metrlrl snop2 t, x - 2 ®Stanpn " P • S Sno Rs' �0 0r ni,� • - - SE 1z9rn PL T < r GREENWrM7D OF .,�� • CEMETERY 3 0 :- . PO SO GROu_HEALT v 0 SS B COUSIN' � Sr �P O 00 CLINIC t.E 2N0, =T u M S 'rl - — _ - _ - — - SE Il22 O Sr SE • 112N0 � � ti i rl — —' Gae YOhrF9 0 9E I Il2np R ].N•T 9� ', Fi, I Nm@COunty Refuse F !tom 11 N O L Llu`tn �/ / ^. < __.___._ Tnnsler Steins SE I (Psi)33.40 ST 3T °.... 1•Hr M'Y Z MT.OLIVET 7 I I (�I 1]arH i e . /�z,. at n .CEM E1TERY 1 N 0..�E < . 9(b I .E:r Aft•' a• 1 MA►LEY `- � ZW ! 1]]!N ]! O ' V,•_ M- a `3lTN L • MT.I. Rla'E!t':\ NE / L. I ice. 'LIb.".Y 2 '.:rr.R�fr?• sr 2 n• .--Er"' r CL@M[ \,. MAPLE VALLEY - SCHt]D a' 1•:'rl% INTERCHANGE L _ _ CI-TY LIMITS_ _ _ L _ f SE u6rN sr �_ _r s[ ^`6 I36TN Sr sl0. r4 I RENTON, WASHINGTON hD .. n• h`'H SE L Sr2-,4�0 VICINITY MAP --' 7�� rF a '49 4 Br4 OE 6], s .{O I i ; r .R4••¢.Nq II. - URLI.NG ION NORTHERN 4�i tti,: Sr a ]6rH (PACIFIC COAST RAIL p0gO= `�.. '6jh Q•ry,r. SWC SUNSET $ DUVALL N • v�i6 =1 a•_�` EXHIBIT "V---' <M1 S' h `\ r.1.4000 LIST OF ELEMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT ELEMENTS OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT. (a) Earth (i) Geology (ii) Soils (iii) Topography (iv) Unique physical features (v) Erosion (vi) Accretion/avulsion (b) Air (i) Air quality (ii) Odor (iii) Climate (c) Water (i) Surface water movement (ii) Runoff/absorption (iii) Floods (iv) Surface water quantity (v) Surface water quality (vi) Ground water movement (vii) Ground water quantity (viii) Ground water quality (ix) Public water supplies (d) Flora (i) Numbers or diversity of species (ii) Unique species (iii) Barriers and/or corridors (iv) Agricultural crops (e) Fauna (i) Numbers or diversity of species (ii) Unique species (iii) Barriers and/or corridors (iv) Fish or wildlife habitat (f) Noise _(g) Light and Glare (h) Land use (i) Natural resources (i) Rate of use (ii) Nonrenewable resources (j ) Risk of explosion or hazardous emissions EXHIBIT "P" List of Elements of the Environment (continued) ELEMENTS OF THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT • M • (a) Population (b) Housing (c) Transportation/circulation (i) Vehicular transportation generated (ii) Parking facilities (iii) Transportation systems (iv) Movement/circulation of people or goods (v) Waterborne, rail and air traffic (vi) Traffic hazards (d) Public services (i) Fire (ii) Police (iii) Schools N/A (iv) Parks or other recreational facilities N/A (v) Maintenance (vi) Other governmental services (e) Energy (i) Amount required (ii) Source/availability (f) Utilities (i) Energy (ii) Communications (iii) Water (iv) Sewer (v) Storm water (vi) Solid waste N/A (g) Human health (including mental health) N/A (h) Aesthetics (i) Recreation N/A (j) Archeological/historical • (4) The following additional element shall be covered in all EISs, either by being discussed or marked "N/A" , but shall not be considered part of the environment for other purposes: (a) Additional population characteristics (i) Distribution by age, sex and ethnic characteristics of the residents in the geographical area affected by the en- vironmental impacts of the proposal. EXHIBIT "P" - page 2 . TRAFFIC STUDY For Proposed : REN1ON SHOPPING CENTER N . E . Sunset Blvd . & I38th Ave . S . E . Renton , Washington Date : February 14 , 1977 Prepared by : Douglas Mulvannv/Arehitects 1920 Terry Avenue Seattle , Wash . 98101 Phone : ( 206) 623-6445 PUG,-'SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ENCY 410 We, prison Street, Seattle, Washington 98119 - (moo , 344-7334 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF AN INDIRECT SOURCE Special Instructions For Filing Can Be Found in "Indirect Carbon Monoxide Source Application and Review Procedures" 1. Identification • a. Name of Indirect Source Automobile Traffic b. Type of Facility Retail Shopping Center. 2. Location (include maps as required showing adjacent streets and area location). Address: '' • 17. • Sunset Blvd . and Duvall ( 138th Ave . S . E . ) Renton , WA NOTE: For Highways, Streets and Arterials - Omit Questions 3-5 Inclusive 3. Parking spaces: Total area Number spaces 480 4. Attach drawing showing arrangement of parking spaces and indicate traffic flow. 5. Vehicle usage data within facility: a. Maximum no. of trips per hour Time of Occurrence 4 : 30 to 5 : 30 p ,m b. Maximum no. of trips per 8 hours Time of Occurrence 11 : 30 to 7 : 3 0 p ,m. c. Average vehicle time required to enter facility (in minutes): 3 min . during 1-hour Peak 2 min . during 8-hour Peak d. Average vehicle time required to leave facility: 1 . 2 min . during 1-hour Peak 1 min . during 8-hour Peak 6. Facilities in King, Pierce, or Snohomish Counties must state the estimated impact of steps made to minimize vehicle miles traveled (public transit facilities,car pool plans, bicycle facilities). (Attach statement) 7. Traffic Flow Data: Complete Supplementary Roadway Information forms and attach. (See Application and Review Procedures.) 8. Calculated impact (attach calculations) a. Current maximum CO concentration 8-hour average ❑ estimated ❑ measured (check one) 1-hour average ❑ estimated ❑ measured (check one) b. Projected maximum CO concentration for projected year 8-hour average 1-hour average 9. Certification: a. I, the undersig , do there y certify that the information contained in this application and the accompanying forms plans, and supplemen I i to I scr. ed hem i , the t of my k:nc ledge, accurate and complete. b. Signature: -� c. Date_February 14 , 1977 d. Type or print name .ouglas Mulva.nny krchitect 6 23-644 5 e. Title f. Phone g. Mailing Address 19 . Terry Avenue , Seat e , Washington 98101 • Continue on Indirect Source Supplementary Roadway Information Forms as needed Form No. 63-165 (8/75) PU SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTRC GENCY INDIREC uURCE SUPPLEMENTARY ROADWAY INFORMATION Special Instructions for filing can be found in "Indirect Carbon Monoxide Source Application and Review Procedures." 1. Street or highway title (including terminus) Duvall (138th Ave . S . E . ) fromN, E , Sunset Blvd . to Coal Field Highway 2. Physical Features (show both present and projected if different): Width in a ectat-c 32 feet curb to curb❑ or between outer shoulders` 3 Width of median strip meters (if applicable) Number of lanes Two (2) Project design year 19 77 (4 lane intersection) • 3. Percent of total traffic that is heavy duty vehicle ("T" factor)*1 A. % Heavy duty vehicles - 1 hour traffic peak: Current *2 1 %; Projected 1 o% (Primarily Truck B. % Heavy duty vehicles - 8 hour traffic peak: Current *2 1 %; Projected 1 % Traffic Delivery) 4. CURRENT YEAR *2 PROJECTED YEAR 19 sin TOTAL *3 DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 DEMAND VOLUME HOUR (Design Data) VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH A. One-Hour Peak Volume 5 : 30 188 20 174 20 245 20 227 20 B. (If Available,on a Per Hour Basis) 1 Hour 2 Hour • 3 Hour 4 Hour 5 Hour 6 Hour 7 Hour I — - 8 Hour 6r Eight-Hour Consecutive 11 : 3 0 Peak Volume (Total volumes,average speed) 7 : 3 0 1095 20 1012 90 1424 20 1316 20 5. Name of agency and person responsible for traffic data Renton Traffic Engineering Department *1 A motor vehicle either designated primarily for transportation of property and rated at more than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) or de- signated primarily for transportation of persons and having a capacity of more than 12 persons. (EPA definition) or any dual rear-tired or larger motor vehicle. *2 Data not needed for new highways. *3 Specific lanes such as express,transit only,on-off ramps,etc.should be considered separately. 30% added for project and projected year. Form No. 63-165-1 (8/75) PUG iOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL_ ENCY INDIRECT SuURCE SUPPLEMENTARY ROADWAY INFORMATION Special Instructions for filing can be found in "Indirect Carbon•Monoxide Source Application and Review Procedures." 1. Street or highway title (including terminus) Duvall (138th Ave . S . F . ) fomS • E . 1.28th St . toiv . E . Sunset Boulevard 2. Physical Features (show both present and projected if different): Width in-r4ete s- 32 feet curb to curb❑ or between outer shoulder Width of median strip -'- meters (if applicable) Number of lanes Two (2) Project design year 19 77 (4 lane intersection) 3. Percent of total traffic that is heavy duty vehicle ("T" factor)*1 A. % Heavy duty vehicles - 1 hour traffic peak: Current *2 1 %; Projected 1 %(Primarily Truck B. % Heavy duty vehicles - 8 hour traffic peak: Current *2 1 %; Projected 1 %T r a f f i c Delivery) 4. CURRENT YEAR *2 PROJECTED YEAR 19 8 0 TOTAL*3 DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 DEMAND VOLUME HOUR (Design Data) VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH A. One-Hour Peak 4 30 Volume 5 : 30 437 20 333 20 568 20 433 20 B. (If Available,on a Per Hour Basis) 1 Hour • 2 Hour • • 3 Hour 4 Hour • I 5 Hour 6 Hour 7 Hour 8 Hour Eight-Hour Consecutive 11 : 3 0 • Peak Volume (Total volumes,average speed) 7 ° 30 2546 20 1943 20331n 20 2526 ) 5. Name of agency and person responsible for traffic data Renton Traffic Engineering Department *1 A motor vehicle either designated primarily for transportation of property and rated at more than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) or de- signated primarily for transportation of persons and having a capacity of more than 12 persons. (EPA definition) or any dual rear-tired or larger motor vehicle. *2 Data not needed for new highways. *3 Specific lanes such as express,transit only,on-off ramps,etc.should be considered separately. • 30% added for project and projected year. Form No. 63-165-1 (8/75) • PUG, ,OUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ENCY INDIRECT '6'v6RCE SUPPLEMENTARY ROADWAY INFORMATION Special Instructions for filing can be found in "Indirect Carbon Monoxide Source Application and Review Procedures." 1. Street or highway title (including terminus) ;1< E E . Sunset Boulevard • From: Duvall (138th Ave ^ 4'1 4 S . E . ) to 142nd Avenue S . E . 2. Physical Features (show both present and projected if different): Width in meters 60 feet curb to curb❑ or between outer shoulder Width of median strip meters (if applicable) Number of lanes 5 Lanes Project design year19 77 (Revised Intersection) • 3. Percent of total traffic that is heavy duty vehicle ("T" factor)*1 A. % Heavy duty vehicles - 1 hour traffic peak: Current *2 1 %; Projected 1 % (Primarily Truck B. % Heavy duty vehicles - 8 hour traffic peak: Current *2 1 %; Projected 1 % Traffic Delivery) 4. CURRENT YEAR *2 PROJECTED YEAR 19 80 TOTAL *3 DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 DEMAND VOLUME HOUR (Design Data) VOLUME SPEED , VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VPH MPH VPH MPFI VPH MPH VPH MPH A.One-Hour Peak 4 : 30 Volume 5 : 30 542 20 604 20 705 20 786 20 B. (If Available,on a Per Hour Basis) 1 Hour L4514 5031 2 Hour • 3 Hour • 4 Hour 5 Hour 6 Hour 7 Hour 8 Hour or Eight-Hour Consecutive 1 1 : 3 0 Peak Volume (Total volumes,average speed) :7 3 0 3160 20 3522 20 4108 20 4578 20 5. Name of agency and person responsible for traffic data Renton Traffic Engineering Department `1 A motor vehicle either designated primarily for transportation of property and rated at more than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) or de- signated primarily for transportation of persons and having a capacity of more than 12 persons. (EPA definition) or any dual rear-tired or larger motor vehicle. *2 Data not needed for new highways. *3 Specific lanes such as express,transit only,on-off ramps,etc.should be considered separately. 30% Added for project and projected year Form No. 63-165-1 (8/75) PUGS,'' SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL' ENCY INDIRECT ;;.;JRCE SUPPLEMENTARY ROADWAY INFORMATION Special Instructions for filing can be found in "Indirect Carbon Monoxide Source Application and Review Procedures." 1. Street or highway title (including terminus)_ `' ^ F . Sunset Boulevard fiom137_nd Ave . S . P . to Duvall (138th Ave . S . E . ) 2. Physical Features (show both present and projected if different): Width in meee*s- 6 0 feet curb to curb❑ or between outer shoulders . Width of median strip meters (if applicable) • Number of lanes 5 Lanes Project design year 19 77 (Revised Intersection) 3. Percent of total traffic that is heavy duty vehicle ("T" factor)*1 • A. % Heavy duty vehicles - 1 hour traffic peak: Current *2 1 %; Projected 1 %(Primarily Truck B. % Heavy duty vehicles 8 hour traffic peak: Current *2 1 %; Projected 1 %T r a f f i c Delivery) 4. CURRENT YEAR *2 PROJECTED YEAR 19 80 - TOTAL *3 DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 DIRECT ION 1 DIRECTION 2 DEMAND VOLUME HOUR (Design Data) VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VOLUME SPEED VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH VPH MPH A. One-Hour Peak 4 : 3 C Volume 5 : 30 393 20 406 20 512 20 528 20 B. (If Available,on a Per Hour Basis) 1 Hour 3272 3 3 S 3 2 Hour, 3 Hour 4 Hour • 5 Hour 6 Hour 7 Hour 8 Hour or Eight-Hour Consecutive 11 : 30 Peak Volume (Total 7 : 3 0 2 2 9 0 2 0 2 3 6 8 20 2978 20 3078 volumes,average speed) 5. Name of agency and person responsible for traffic data Renton Traffic Engineering Department *1 A motor vehicle either designated primarily for transportation of property and rated at more than 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) or de- signated primarily for transportation of persons and having a capacity of more than 12 persons. (EPA definition) or any dual rear-tired or larger motor vehicle. *2 Data not needed for new highways. *3 Specific lanes such as express,transit only,on-off ramps,etc.should be considered separately. 30% added for project and projected year. • Form No. 63-165-1 (8/75) - ' . - '. TRAFFIC 7l0N FOR COMPLETED PROJECT 24 hour period Total Square Feet of Buildings---- -----lO0 , 00O square feet Automobiles attributed to Project Use---- 6 , 000 cure (60 vehicIea/lOUO square feet) Peak 24 hour Period--Christmas - 6 , 720 care (apply factor 1 , I2) Apply to Total Traffic Count as Percentage ^ ' ` Peak lloo'r-- - -- 12Z of 24 hour Period Peak 8 Hour - - 707 of 24 hour Period r ,777-7--•, l'. , . ... . i PV D i . -1--- ID Tr2)AFFIC TA\l' ULATIC)k--1 . II PAY5T l'E.A.r2-) - \, (S . 9> ir ir) .."-------------'..-' 0 \ --:" 4/7, ...__ . AT _:.... _ _--f _17.7= \4* - . _ . .. ... -....:.= --- „GPI) ....-- . _ -.0-- . . (1) .- . PAPte-tq eTAL-1..... N il co _ ce T , . Pro Po S E-.D ai I-, 51-1c2PPI i-iq c. 1-4-T a . Lil rA_ . . III ___, I P UTU 127 E PI-2,1 VATE P-1 D.I__ H . 0 . STREET RIGHT-OF-WAYS N . E . Sunset Boulevard West of Duvall (138th Ave . S . E . ) : 5 Lanes with center lane as holding lane and left turn . East of Duvall ( 138th Ave . S . E . ) : 5 Lanes with center lane as holding lane and left turn . Duvall (138th Ave . S . E . ) North of N . E . Sunset Boulevard : 4 lanes with outer lanes as right turn only . South of N. E . Sunset Boulevard : 4 lanes with outer lanes as right turn only . • A new 5 phase signalication system with 8 phase capacity will be installed at intersection of N . E . Sunset Boulevard and Duvall (138th Ave . S . E . ) during summer of 1977 . Source of Information : Mr . Lumbert--Traffic Engineering Department Renton , Washington • ,, " ' ^ -, kk '`e. . '' -•"/,,7,••• 1----7.- , --,.,-..--.:.__,......._-_.z.3. 1 \----N• f( ' -.• 4 \-' - 1 s•-•\V 1' \---?:t.)3 A (.,(--- 1.... 41 ).!•••• \\4;ft,‘1'••••-"--; /••_.•••I,(4-7,.,,,•,./..)'..\.....)1_j •2 • ,,---- __. . . . • . \-'''Th -\\ _.-vS.2y---) -i) }\-\--:1,-,:4.7:.101:,..-',T.,(__,,--_;;,1,-1,,4_,,,,-:_•A"___I ._.) ,___\`, ,. . 1,,-.., ( ..----i_;,_._ _13-).4-11,2.7_,... ____„,,-------:\ ;'. • I '; 1 •"----' `II \'' \'\ \\\I. \...1.. I --Th#:: .'( '' - *.\ \_-,-.\ -,,,,'"v-1---.--- -::L'`-------'''N11-.77-- r-------7. ------ --\-------------5.-\-.. -i--,--L---r ,1\_S .,',1 (,,„/"69', i ,..1,7-).1-.c.-__--.--:- ',---------- ' --.. ,_,--\-) ;, . c,, )..- ., •- --,.7 \- ....,,-,-. .,! ,, ._r_.-.3,... .,/,;;; • ;( ) _ha-'.':1-,•",/ - \ , ,._V 1 ,‘..I",'\.::',---,.----)--,) ',f(i, , i -!1 '''• •- ''' `•• '''\ ''''&,i-----------:.----- " '''' • -- i ...44i•-72 .,, . i "..---2.•‘:',\ ',il i C\- .,•r-c-N\\ ', -. ) °\'( \\';•\N j - _.A c\ r' )L\ 1\. ; i;;\-'.----'-, •. : .r • '.. iNN:',.....((-‘ z-zs------ 1 •-• 'N-./-i 4 l' -. ----,,', (---,`? (•--1-',-":-'N'r ii.W-.--.‹) 1•.I\L.,____'-\5=,- •i ) / f - . --A.,/ _:,..,:-__:-...,.., ,Pi1•77:<•.:I:: i i t\ '' 1 ..j.,) ).• ' i " N •* (•.**-* ,13.Y,1 '-• 2 '')i :!';'\\,_, . . 1 ), '`•.,•.•-:•\ •-----z----c------- ______________-. `-'-----*--\ • \----- --L-*-7-7:1 ........,_„. ' I / * -"7-*- C \. .\\'\"•[;-..-`,'•-:-.-.•...:-_-_,-,2'--'-z-' ,-:_s___ ___f__,,,,,_____. r , . • -6, •-----, , • •‘ 14.4 ' - ? ,--• '\ , \)-•,\ ‘,, \ _,‘‘.....,Q), , ;,.,, \,,s,, \ --- -- \------ 1 - ,\ y ' \--- nz; --11;i, `• ,`•.-. •• ,• .2_-.,--,-,- _ -- .•••-:.,,,r •- \ s • - N - 1.! j.,./) '---:',..--) 11,:, ((•'"1 ' \- ,,_ \ -1, , • I " ' ' < • c(frs, \j \\ \b0% ) : ; i..G. ,••• 7 N \\\ ---- - _____.......- .._ --..„...,7"-7:: .....:\r",-----. -:::____ ( `.-- \\\\., \c"-.C.)::Z' -':^,--.' ' • W \ ' /L' 1 ' /i': '''(\„ (4 c:.-----is'I •- )\'':'' 'is\N /1;\\. .‘-',)\\ 1 )\-' , / /,'''-. ,, /41/ . ( •.\\,',\,•'‘',.c`‘s,',.,,,,,,N,."•-_-,,..----------::.;.,:,---, :3("--- ---;.-_-.7"---._____."'------.\,,_..„ \,\ s.-- \\\::''Cr'o ', l'',,`', •‘'.---C,'.. ,,,./.-; ' / ! ' ' • , . .1 -/ •-,, c,./.'', :,,,..„ •. ,,,, ,,•2 p ••\;\ , ,i` , ...i•'• , ,6' •,. I ,`.., \ iv,.\\\ -,:, c''....„,„. ..,,,‘..__,// /;I,. \‘......;4, /) \‘‘es,, ,s‘-'''•'-1*------^,'..----'''' .2-- --;.--'f•-'------..:.. .. -\•-.:_-.>. \ ,•-•\ . \ ',1 , -.Q./ o !..I ,, _l •,Q)J. • . ,. . . ! .•-•••_/. ‘1\I ,( I .;i II•,/ _. ) ;• ,'. •N,..---\\,,,i \i., • __--- _,,• '1 \ \- \\1, ';'. t-s. `-' ri."--z5=o's\ i : ; ?, I."II; i, ' rt---\'-'-'".(7.,\;..s \,;,..\\;:s.'1,-:,:N. -r's , -- j. _::\--- ,..._,,•-,_ -----,. ,_,) ,_, 1)/ -: ,L-0,4;\"..A,,,..y, •:\ '.--..--,„ \\. -.., ! I ,,, b t .; i ., 1 /' • ' .,-.7:-/7--&----- ---;1:).-',-!:;•,,-,..II' ' V ''.. !, ;)) -"---7,..._1::* ! 1 \ \ \\ i .•,:\,,\: ''',\-----;:,',,,,,\:, / ; . / ,I\\ ; 7 , i , \;.\‘ ,..., -k‘, ,,•.•-•.. ,),, '----- --- ---- --\\ ___---\) 'N,-.------,--,IN__- 1..,•-. .•-• •,.• , , • ,, / \;K ( ,1 f.,'I - (.--.1,1---"A ! I (: 4:.•-•-•••'..:7,\......I.; • f \ •,:.\, ••S‘K,•.\ --;•\\„. I; .' ; ,?''• i ,•• 4 l's•:: .'• U I \ '''''':f!'.'•`••-•'''•:• :,... ..N,5,-;:.--- L../. --;;---) l''.. %---) ,,,_.11".---„,..-7 ‘..-2`-'\.• --"I.,•-', .,-__-____V__\‘, i'''s•,\n ..N N -7 -''''l•' i 1. n 7-•?. N- , ___:•,,fta---. _-.47.-4-__-1!/: -\II I 'N.I'' r-i• -_:-----J\ 1 I, I, •--,;:' •n r. :It) •- 1, N \, ••.' , ..c •._.., \ N.;; / • i •• ',. . . \-••' ',2' ''‘' '.--•'-•''''.---‘-- : ,-=.-''-- 7-s,\'.,i'7.,_.,}1\ ---\-7\ \-2 f: -,--- 'Ie ‘ ,'‘,? --..-"..'-/ \ ,...., • 1 \ I .\ .\'. 2, ''. • / r ,1 f• • 'f4_ 711. '.1 ..1 0 .! '!--`•\ !• \ ' 1: s• '•• ''' 1•\,\ '• '‘• • j r.. I ' ' \\" '-''--, t ''',...t:-._/-2,'`,,\, c'''.'. '' '',... '- ..• L' .=-----c---=\ ( c---, ,,,---,-,---2-,---_-;,.ir ; •:\ . ----_-___: --_-,,--••,,..•.K---_----.--- . --- •( - 1.. •------ , _,' \ .\ .., .... , . ,1 A .le- - -.,...'• s'e,e--.,e',.\‘‘,•1.,_-_-_=-__.•_--..• ‘, ) ',.• • L.•• n>•..._2_... , \• ' \\ -.\.';.\•;---„,,,,, „,`-•-,• , t 1 • ••, 1 \ •t(\__,, t: „ •__:-...---' ,_•,\,-; ,*.'•\ •-•+:•,,.-.. .\ '' ‘-N-Sz.:----"--••=2.-----_ ,,•)-. ) ' ,- ..\ -r----------,--:---:.-___---i...---_-____„-),\I •• ' f ;,.J. . \ \ ' . -.7 41,-ILL-rii:--.T4'." 7:-:=--gi,' r-. ''.;•. ":1, I: %'-:.. 1 s,)1\\'''Ck1.111\.•,•••,1'.:•.••'.,•'-'---\-.kcj r ilL.r. . ..\7_,_.:":•-•-••":--- ' I /L--'7:1••3?--A\\-C\K5\k‘;''''''•••• •\.:::` ,:-\i' '''?\K.'.1-. .-.J.--,7.-',,-‘1:•-•••••'..,,\• -.....‘ i „ _- • , ,, t \ \NN, . .----7 ','NI•s• -•-•i ))\,. ,7- ,p 5------- -,-,,.__.- \ J • 1 . ••'''_-1-.. ••"""-II 1• \--h'i * 1 ''''9. t• -----"' 't •,• ..--1:. **-; ------- --'11--;--.°..„••• :•\\;->.„..'•••---<--'"----; \ ' \-%"1--• , \•••, ' I.,,,, ) •_, ,. i_,,,•)! s•,,,,:-.. - ''-•‘. •• •\ ,- ,,, ,i ec-----c„__,,_ 1, , , _ ,,,,,ale .,', '',I LT- . • • •- I I,' , 'i,-.• .7----,, (, •-'"- -:-';.T.-"-:',,,,,,---_-_.-_,_. ',/,, ...,7,)`‘-‘s- •- .,\N. I/1 1.• -. '‘,• •••••---„,„, ...• ,..,\.,'t..\,.., ---,...---,,,,,,),,,,:, •• . --ks R \::-.:-•-' r-... ', _ . --,-,,,,:„.„.12._,,,,-, - - ri '\ •-•-• ,-,1' 35 " --'? '- - . •. 21 1,,,,,.._____...--:•4! /--.\\., ./1// ,,,,i.„e. ...__...,, ,.„ ,„ .........,,_._,:„...2,..,,,,,...., •,( ......,... .. >s,.. .„.,..,..,‘„),, 1: ....u• \, (..,......, ,. ,. ,.. .„ __., .., ,,,.•::.•,:_•,, ,,__ /...,. /y1 .. / •,1_3., , ,..._• ,,, __: :.1: : . ( .. , _ \.. ..,...... ,,,, ...___,_.. ._,...„.„, ,_, 0,0,.............._, 2_, .....,.._ .. ,.0 ,, _.7 \ . • ...______ •,.._. .• 1 . . . ._ _ .• ),....,\.1. ,...„,_.... „. __:.:....„....„„...„______.:„.,, ........_____.,_,. •;•: :„......„.„...:.: „:„.• :••....L_____ __________,____ \_2„,,......... ,,,,,._?...) , ...,1...:,.... 1'',.-- -.----_`• .,_ -,_•- ..- . (- -r i.,,-4.,•/V,-,-•741:-..,;1:'.-1•24;:/1__I if.i'. ,•). N'„-___-__:-.,,..L„. --- ,--,,00).,r7r.:-_-,-„,. ,-_,...._:,: . "• ,. . ..,. . ,,,, . ,,,,,,•„•-_,...___-_,.„, ______,1„... •..__._...•,. ..s. "4/7\e, /;-,, '''', '• '• 0 ' ' • ••••- - .•:. ..• .330 . tdi.1.-- ..L'•II;(1`•---; :•,-r-•'-;•s If !` 'cl.‘k,„___, -- , J.-2,T,-- .---.="•-- ---------':7/ (/ -;-•••• . 7 '''' \ ''' '-.. a 11 , s\ ,,,./ ! ..---7.00••-•\‘:.' ,___,,,, \k":):',,,-..;------- _:=____-._- '• •II (.'/...',.. „-1('‘.,(_.-- -. .1 _., , '2.--,-.1-•>-1•`: cl•••"-\.,...."-.-,-. ' .:----•- I • \ • I - ' .. • `,, .. `,.'„ • . _ / /,•,, . .--') •° . I('‘',• -••'.-'''•••''-'•C ' --•. ••)-N)V - ',S-T,: - t • •..! 0 ; ,A...• t. __- , • /- -----L;I '••' ' ' - ••'---J. •• *-,- - --------77.--- --_________\-. --- /)\ ,,-(--„--.,' . -1 •'-,- - , •:, , , . : V.••,:-'7-•i ttr •). -y, -,. -,.\,-,-,-3,.._..., , -:------.--7.- •\'• __._ \ _-------- -°- ;-,-------- -,_ ,i7-.4-,-,s-7-4,2.+_---ck...........L:t 7 ,,,,,c,„- .- .Th,__-s.:::-.\_•••.,.._...._:...--::______-- -____-_,_ . I, .,, ________..„ • 7--------- ---=---------------1 ' '`,------------:------ -----____-_,-;/ '. . ..,,, ‘4..„----..--.-f..•_,\. ..... \ ____--- „...,-......,-- ---,/( •• , ,....,,..•,,7 s...-..,-,.--_- ) " . ': 1 ,,, ) r.:, • ,',I -c-:•----„?) • ) ' \', \. • ''\\•\ ..--7',/ <---------.-N1( f /% • e\._ ' I. ,-,•••••• • • • (:*\_i • •' V I •,--- • 1,` 1 f "\jr--------t "--------.A. '‘)1 s •-• ---_-_-_ -_--if.:----------..,--,-,-\ ..N_----,_.- - _____-_-_-:--._.._ ___. / _2_,._-_,----- -, ---":"'„1.'":,.... ...___,..---1•---,-••-•,-;.'z,•__,,,,,... . •••••- ',- I • \•• I• -:-' :•\ \, • ..:,..: '‘. ( ‘0.: g, .: r,1 \ ,,-•:.::,,,-_-•----,,,,, '1, ,.... -- __,-/-4------:--<.---)-----c-_----". - „•_;•_..-,-----7--,`-`-----7:„.•---•:, 34:g6 'I. *••••---',1••``-:!;?•:* • '*,*-'''•---17,-.e.7-1•-,-•••, , r.,,, ',•,\\ _) ,,(-A-,;_-_,- -,,,, , ,\•., - -• !../-•\ . t ,I,_, , 0.,-•_,..,:/•,-- ,,, \,. .\• •,,••.\\(-\ ./ \ . "-_._ ....• •• / • - 7,-----.----,_.,-,i__4-,-- ri---.-, „----, ., -- •____. \_.-., •\;.,._,n('''.e.,,/____../__e_4:-.-<---e.'-•"t•,._-_,---,------Tr- •.' , ••n'•- -.------\--\,/'?,t•• — • • '7.-!---,-::,--717-1-__•_-___‘-_,:\ \ •\\ • •-•,,, C. e-,•••• ,,,.. 2:_-_-_2.11-••-^,-..---....--.Z..._4,___, N•- ' (r --/Lr-•----- 3 r9.--,, • - , ----- -..------,-\-i-..:•,:_---,...____. --------:----- :--.---,------ -------- . \,, . _, , . ... \ , \ --,.. \ - _..,,I ,, ,\ .\ ..,„ „ ..• _-_,,-,-„, )•,, 1 n‘,‘X .,.) //•/'..1\• ••• \ ••--._ _____•••-----______. • '( , C:::: :;1 (---:4 ;,j,,,,(..7),(;;,i \\\;:::.-_--,,,s,.s,:_,f:::,,....::;:')..:::\‘',:.•„,..,,..,`,.,. '•',:'. _,, ,...,,,,-.1_•:::...14:;.1".„, ,,,,i,/,„):::; )\si ‘‘,.:\i'i",_*-1•.',.0:1 I---:2-1-:.i:°N.,. •..„,..7.„.....,,L.... .:_>_......„......../•,...T.... . ....„_,,,.. . .,_ __„,, J:=___.,.„.•. , , •,__ - 6 • -•;'''. •,• •••)• _ :-.. , c .,I. ---___....6).: '-•.• .. - • •‘ "</ •,,\ , r ; .•1 -= •• (---- •••-, In --`,,--.. \\\ • ...--__.::-_-_-- •,:----..„ --.......... .... ....• .; -- -..-----'l--.`-\,,c___ , ,,, ,• - ° ‘.. ----,..--:r-•,! . , . \); ,-,•-jr-,;:ii I •• \ \ .1 if • li \ ,, 4..thl 11 ----- -2--- ---.....••_________ , -„___ •••••„,,,\. . •....__ ,...,,---„• ,, -.,,, ...=_,-,-/tr--c,,,'7), \\-• ip_ V\ _.4, ..•:.-7.:::--1-7; .I'c, •\ `..,• ,..•-';',,9'<'.,;;;;.-'.,••1,..-2 j 1•2 , ,, --'• .•\.,„•-,.\".'...:'.,.•,-__-....--,•••,. •"- ..;„-..:-T....:•-__;.----- ,..., ,„...--- 306„ _ : \. /• ,-.-----,-.-- • •,-, -'`,_•_-:" • .L;•-) •1:. __•f•rNI ,bc. , ‘,' .,', II-.-•-•/,--_,_-_=-7 I I,. •,--- •I••,`.. • I r r •;-j-, ss. ,\s, 61,,n, „, , .7 , ,., --,----,-. ',-_--•__:'•.••••.•\••"--- -------___---2-77--- „.„.:....'i,i..„.----7.-. •-•"-- ----...._._.-___-7-,--------./ , .. , i'l\ /'' CirE7 */ '- .-.,..•-:-\ -.-.i-.7!..••.• • '- ‘'.--...----- . .------ ;'-.-----r•T‘'S''‘, 1/--\-'- ir . -'• 7. '' 7,\ . ' ' ,r / -i.., `..\\ ''',\\ '•• \\,, , ,,p,.. „' „K N, •, ,,,.._.) \131,;11 N.:-..,.7.7-7--.7=--; ,-->.- .7.7,------: . ------) ,K1\ ,‘ i. \ - •\\.‘ :-/° I.'i 7 '' .. . \.,\ q-1',\.., ).'•,i- ' E,Js - "0 ;1 -:-. .-_ , h \ l. 1 '', I- -_,•• __•_•(.: _(. ••.!_Za_ ° .. I---.,______._ n,\,‘,.•\• :../(2-'-----.•--.4' ---=--,2,!, I. Bi4, .• ' , • \‘‘'.,•, ..',„\°‘):• , -.1 E• -)1-:- nr"- ° '-sX 1/4,,, . ------'-•\ 'sx\\_y,} • 1 ,L,„ ._L - • s\ (.2. \ ,•,, •. __._______•, . .4\5..2-) ----,.., -.1...._.-.--1---,_,11":;1;.-:1:-..:-)7_:::77:.;;----H.,_•I''-- 1;ft.)..-(':\\,1\\--:-.---,1-•-•-'...:.•;(-8,:,•-----"::'-':\N:,\•..,.. . _ • _.---_,..-- ‘,N1 1 - • • N -,,x. • • -, , \ \\ , ,, f.,../;" . il- .__. ._ ,•• ,. .„, / -_-_-_=:_-_ -_, .,.--,:. „,,,.., -,,, u, ••.•• ,-•:--,, - " •••\• ,__, ,,\ , ,,-• , ‘,1( " •••••" °, • . ) . k . ' • • ---- , " . ''‘,.-\-7',-i. '4 , •\I-‘--",?--.f '-,,.1,1;'-'.--.1 i I.-" • • \ \, --;_L.-_;..--=?-T--:-::-.•'- • . ----\ \ , . i...---,,--i,-•-. ..-• -‘,..---) n--),•:..,,,f-\ _ „ _____,---.. , - •, 1-:-.-:...,„',..,:--::::::\\',\\, ,i r.\,\ \ . . . I . W. .(1"--,-------..\ , ••••. )\ 4:1r=-il ..i ' \''00 2\ '.b, ';'',.\','.• ;,L) • -.---- r - • ). - ;'433 • 1• '1,(---- ', •-, \I t. t, \\ ..\ , , , ______ j).., \p ,1 A -7\e‘i .,.,.. \\\\,,,, ___, ,.‘ ‘‘,. N\ \ ,. ,:_,,\,,,,, , „, 1 .. , , r ,-, , ..: ,.. . r . ,. , . , .. • •_..,.__..--;,=_„„,__I .. • ' . „ ,,•,• \\‘--Th 2) * c:l' 57 ff ' • •II ),1;; ..).. : ,-'''------. L / - ''.• !' .•.' , . ., ••it• '\\ ' -(-`, ' \ •.. - . •..i:. •\..,,p, ,,,,'\,. \ •, . •...),) if: ' • .)(4(.,(---_.-.=-&--., s -.-:-.11-•:,-:f_ ..--...' •- •.:. ,. •.,' '\___'', `'_‘,..-.--. --..N\'‘;• ,\, \_., , , .. , - • - \ , ,. , -,1: , \ . • \ \ ,,,. \\ •\ ,.• ,,, ._Th. ..- , --".• ------- ,"--•:., -•,. \\- - , ---- . ,..,- i •---,--- ----/:' •.. .. \• ,_, , r - .\\\•\'' ,, ,' \,\V• .- - 4--•=,- --- , • . .„. -,.••.., • .'"--31\ • ' ' \ ''.•;. -1 ii• ' . \ 2 ...' \ .1,\,,_,,,.•\\ ;• \. .. , '\-,',f2 0'7',_ l''''' " \) i - ill <, -- - ! c•-- ,• ', ----" (,-,).,,,,,,--,ca,-,•,,,...-.. 1\ . %).\.• (--,.:-=-i---.,- ', —255S- 'i' ' --(47-, -?(, 8,2i ; \• . \ -______• " "7: ....=-----(•-c--' __._-:1. . . . . '• •', \ ' )\ , \‘‘, \‘:\°__---.../.." ........_ __--_.-- ..„-_ - , . 1 , ,,._-_---_,----,-;._ ' \, ' (--) `,01.\I 1'1 [1; • . \I \ '-' ' •:_,,',j'•:,,,,,,:._:,,,_, .._j, , _,:, ..,‘, ..\. ,__,,..i.,,, ,,,y,\, ,\,., ,,,.\. ,. _____,,, ,:,...1.__________,..,_. _____.7,,,., _____ . ..., ., ,. ,, ,. . '.- .'s!..'1 r'°1 -i j•4 '.( . .., ... ,\ . \,, .: , . ii.___..:....:..._..,...,3. \\,,,\,.\ :/6/.; 7:,----. • . \ ,,. , i. ..,..- ,‘ li- .i. , IA; -‘-`,.'--•••°,4,,:),-;;--. 1%J4."', ..'-•-.;-:•‘;•\-\ \ . - •• ••-•••• -,•-?-"--4 •::', 4.. . _... . , . •------------->:-z..--,\:, ..:_____. ..„,,,,,„ ,\,,•,,,.",,....;....---...."__•, •..-_-_----- ,.- •:',-/::/.- ;.-• - • • . 1, , ..., ,,--, ,... .. • . . » •••_..L_,..:•,-1A,..1,...,... ,-,:,,,,,_;•:_v--,-„il 1 , „•-•-- _______\ • ..L\_./.,,,, ,. , • \ ._ \N , ‘, ,. .‘. , s „ .„ _ , . , .., ., .. . ._ ,-.- .. N ,,k--------- ,',-- ). , ..,,.\-: • ,..„,,,,:_, \\„ \•\.‘,... ,_:-.--.-_-_--- .,-;---;_,-_-_-:..... ,,--,--.---,-„,' , ,•,„. ,..,•; , ,,,,, \, ..,\_,. ,,,,,. -•,,,-;:inn.H. .i. . (..\• :-___,,,__Ai- 1.--,.-ji...,..,,,, ,,,,,,,r,.:,,-,.... „...,.._. ... . - _,,,....., ,,,,, ,,,,.\,, i , , - :pc-. • . ,--,. ., , • f.:.' _...••. r I''':._ ••••• ,.,.‘ \ •, . ---,. ,.....7_____:•-• ,. _,,..,,,:.z. j_s\-\---:.-',.\ ,., .: • - ; •.. •-,\ \\‘ ' ,-.---\- .''\\\\ ' •--- -. •,..', /.--ri-r2._/ ,,,,/,/,.•-. , „-•,.•'I,\ \ \s 0,_, / ' 1 \•I (II._ ''',\11‘,.I .1; ;1 ,, \ • • I III 71-i.,=1'; :tl° !‘• ' „ • „ ''*\,•., •.• . --`1.1•••••--...---..„._;;c_b\.,,. ,--,--...,„.. ,,, -:z..-..-`1,-,.._ ' •••*-\-\',.,.,...:..---• ..‘ s, . , , , .---1%..../„,-. ,,:•::::,./. / ....../ 1 ,: • t „ • "----\ -----. ' • ' \.'7* •r-C--\'' • 11 • 1 / \ 4-_1 40 t''r IiIs-°.; •II,T)1 I --1; a • „...,,-'-' :,,' ,' \\ •. al-'. '----:•>•---....--- •\ •\, 1 - . . • '''' - • - )in. \'- : • n i••'0• ''((//,'' 0-.?•-••q•f---.;:n'f-i ": l• '=.ii.:. .. '•"' • --'•-'N• ', --N..„‘-\,::.-,.2.N ' ',-----•, , • \\ \.,,,• - - i( 1 , ,• - - ..-.• ,• I '/ . . '., •• . • . -•-Th ' 0 • • •I'. ?,' . 1•1•1,--- -•.\\ \ /--- \ "•.‘\'--,, , _.20,\., " , . . ' „7;',,BDy -`,-) ')1 lc ;°Ili .)t. •' . O,,',4 '-`,./;<:.;a.T:14 .• . l:Vars-. !:4i(._1,_-----, -. •• _ ..40')•11•10'. '!ii • .---- •_!-•'' \ •:.. •• r•T . '5; __ ---•,,,,,6---------\'• .-4--L, .... __,.._ 4.•III_!.,.= • II y,-'-''' 1,, .Z•tr.2',a_ .1j. ,: . • i'_.; ,' . • v \\ \ •\ c---- -.,/ 0 I'..'N't„.k.,.., 0_41._._ _i l'. ..••=....-a.;:.\--N.--- :-.•i. , :-,------, 7-',4-7,--,:".-..-1-----,:,..-;.--A--7,-...--T•,I-„,_)„,•-•:,!_ • • • - , • I irk CI. ,4,, f „.-,•-... ''',....,• 'e• •• e ' . ' , ' •‘!• : , -. ' *•\ \\____, *'-''''''•:-*-*.--//\ • **'''' ' .1' ' ''''l I Ii .'• • •• ;/ 'i i . \‘‘• ,\'`....*N".•‘-‘,', ‹,<''..- I • ..,- • . -,....,-, ' I I I • ' t'•;•',1,-'1":6"rie.'4:Plant";;j**`•• / •••\ \--,?' .0*`).)'‘,1.---,, '' '' *". •1. /I' \ ) ‘ *.*:-'''*'*\°-''• ' ../''. '• '' ,*E&TON I '*I.• '''''---C . , a r 1.•:'' ' ' ,. ' ONtlit.a.:A•0i*"--,/f•- -:---,.." :4---=-.,- '','-•----- • • - _ _ ` thvi \..'•N . -.- . .-- „,„---,.,, ,,,,, ,..,\:)-•.,-;,--,-.__ ..N;,, ; ,...:•------.,.,-... -_-.,:,--.. ..,.-:.,,_ i/,••-(..,T . .. ,•• • s. - ! :•• •,._•.!l' ..‘.. ; ..•... . a 777. \ 9",- ..; •,:.__ __ •.______vfl:'L.1„___.'".'m,\ \\,,_ \ --„,91,- •-•.N,,,, '-;•,.-..----:_-_:::::--- -,• (q., ',./ •' - • •, i 1 1; 1,, • :;•••,..___.: :•.••... 6•c•re;•.;),,, \,'"-•;.•, r, , • / • .. , g. .1 _____. • • , / , . • ,..., ,..),,,,, , ,.\c•Av i , ;(.. \ /L/7..'"Ni.),,r2L.,-; f°•° 4.14•,4..." / ` • •`' • ,i 414 4:4.1,',- i 0... . i . ._... ,, ; "\ . .___\-,,• ,.=,-.. i;• • 1 ' \ '•-.. ' '•, ''..c.=:,' '- „. %, .---- ......_,T.:',..‘:\-- ,.-.:.___,:---- -7..,,;',',,-,-.,7J-i,,,-„ ----..- --_:,:.. ,;1;1,,,,_ ..',__ . .- • .._ , • • •• -. - . ''', '• •••'''9\' 11 ' \?•7 fr:/•-%:4r•n•• ::1 \•ii III /6.2/ /•,-,•••--:'. 1 ( .. • 1 - i. -,;;--. • '':•L•_—:.......- _.---_'. -/ '',• •••,, ''l l•-• . • •''' '-, :.1 ,\';•4..!. , -/ 0,'•r .,.,:;,:;.-.:p ------ - \.- i .. • • • • , . - ••• A:-4--.... 4-* • • . . ,. - .i rl ________ • •- 27----- •- -- • .-...-9-1----------Li, -,,...-,‘ , „:, ' • • ,------ \‘, \ ' • , • ••••.r. °•• \' -, - -' .. 1. .i, ,.. - ,.. , - ci---•--------•-,.--- ---.--•----.-____...:_?ii,i _'•'_ —_____ ___..\_. \ ‘. \s - ‘.:• • ,...-:7-..,,, , ... ,,,0 ,,- .1, --„.-------,------1•• ,, .---- . [yr .,c..:,,,....11. ,. 7 -.- H. • • \o '.--'s •••1 ! 2------ -1;1''''-h. '5 'L., . C ., . — .. . . ,. . .------ •R,-,4 t, 4, .,,.• .,..:,••••.....,..1! :. ; \,k, .... ', .:' i'...;,--•,.-- '----------------------------------------. •,Ihs."7 illir i HI- "-------';`/_-__-.---_-:,.1'-7-"'. ' 'k.'--• . : : ''''''.-5' :-. -I . - . 117'7'... . - -1-- "• • ...bll: \,--.14-,1\--- j----(c):_:1_,::\•,__'' 7..:. '''.-- ---...4- : --..•••••' -.4.-.1:1) \1---'''. ------71-,. ---------7-1‘..1':-:\--',....1::•-::}f.:‘..:' - --••• - :i: :,)E,••:‘,,•• :Ie.- s\ • A ' ,,, , , -._______. . .... .r, - . :. • • . --o • •- ,;(0,Z.,17,-,----- ----L-[_-____ ,I 0 • ---1'i' l'i (_., • .• ••• • . p. -II-.-1 •-`-- : ,-- \-,--., • .. --- • „11 i.....:-•:.:--,.:•::• :,I 7.---- -'-'--- \--\ ,,__., ,.. ---r-...1%-.J.,...-.:-..°,!.......,:.,. , 4 Ji--.-.--,--- ,, , ,____,-.:-. • - - - ! ' -- ,• ' *" '''.. - 1 il' i.r •' •. , , ';---, '•••-:'• €.41) ••• ' \ s • ':J C \ • ' \ ''-c, (-------\\ . . ,,\1•1 \. . '-'- ••• ••:••" ‘, . • , • , o i•1 ••••:::::-•I4 5• •• i ' •.1.;1 IF„,„,,C.,:".:•iiii pi , i ill n,,ig.li..;;,,,:-..,51,4,,i1t4,.47) ,: ,.. ., •.‘ -, •! \Al\ ,' n P q • 1 1/2 6:44 I • • 1,--'' c3 • ' • - , l • • '; •' __. .,.,\ -.--,-r--.-----,..r.,eQ, -';'''''''' u tuy \ 'I''t.••,\i-. .r( \d, I.L.___A__n----_,.1 I 0•:-.. - -.., - -!•-. . . , • . -\7.,.2.__' . .F4'I::--4-•-•-••••••;°,::/: i Sin •, . ‘.1.1 1.•-/•• .. -- ----'--- ----',,\ , ; ..,• 0. : '. IC:Itill •,-•-•----c 1-----=•=0-'`- '•"-c, ,,, , ;,.Q.1,,;-;:z., .,,,,,z;;II: I c,4 ,„iv,:;. 11,.,,,,,,w _•,• ., .., ;\;. .._ , ,,, ._; ,;__. . ,,, ;C;•• , • • • • • i; I , • \ \--,--1-------;-• *N`;•);T:,,,_,_------:_.7:1,,...F.72.,, •°',) P. .) 1 1'1° i•i •:,••••,,1__,, . • .... ) .•--•-•'''''., Cr,'\. / , (-7.--,,\ (----...,_'--,,,,`,„ . ...- ..„-_-,--„,--...,_/,7-'-. •--.....?„0..._ ____-___,......----.\i\ :- ..ii ):::.:•••••••):::•••-1::::•:::?. /4\,IIL „'• , '., ••::::•:-,::_44,,_•••,°:,i,w.,;,,L•-- F. • • ..' • !'• .';\''' R1.•'; /4'-. ) -1 '1''\,.,\-''..L '-77.1,,j).J..,,', ___-.:7',,,,..\:"--;.(7\2...c..,../_-_7\,,,,,__,.>-•••,_'',..,\ s':•-•:.:,...,,,..:..,..,...::::::.,,,.,:"..____\\ .1. .(/) (N,,,A.,\f,.', ..".... ..,.,. ; ...:„. 1,,------11--;:•,..,.;„52-- t . ,----'-'.'--.,__'.. ;!.•.d. '11\ \•'\ 'n . ,• ••'••• '.-..•I • • ..,,---=-y1 ..?..,,, .- :i.:.:'...;O I,=..--'....,: ...‘'I j3 li: • -....\ ---......i.li-.‘..:::_.7..,•yut••,::‘,..3i. .;,.....,i,,,tt.4,..,,r,ttc,t...,.....,,,...;7::::1. • i_9_ _ „..:.‘_..... ,: 2, ,, ,z,1,.. 4 it3 ; , . ...,;.• ...), ....,,-.•;., i,•: , •. . , ,-,,.. ' •: ; \ o ,AI •----.' ,• ••e'•••• ' 4•::;.•-t--W,?..:•°'...,,)J`11-*•--"M.-•11 "I • '. (' '' --'• f---) .---' • --il'i lo-•••••ii'• ••••tibt • --- - ,. . • .\zk41. ,, -..-..i,, • :,.. , .. .,•: ET ... , . • ,\ fe,•,, ) . --- c).- ,/, - ___T_____, ,., '`•\),------1-- 11•---_, --._. - .•.. ,,\, i• •• .7„.......--. ...,,.,n e , -11. ez-IL • _„ : , ul --/.1 . .,.--'',,) ,"*. ----,r: ,••:,.::::,•%.i-11111,,:,,•••..;:, :,. -----,:'---.-i.---L-?', - ›,—.----,,,.- E.,\ •I' • . . . 1 . , 1 l '„1 : r 17, -. !---42.7,1141Iff,.: ....%--.) :- ,.,.,;,;• ••-•,•,..,...•. ,,.. ,:_•,''.:--1.,:.4..,!!..'::„.;,L1,i13,-..-:•:'1,'_- - ----'-- -- I . '-- . ,..____•..ft_.: ..-,-_) _:,,,•11 \_ -..:i.:. ,• . .‘. . :•.....2,,,:, , , . \ : ,,„ •;: ••• , r.. ...., . . • ,-----,..: ---- ,,.,.., -1-,--::...-. ' 1\-- ••\ \ •i •i -!! • , - , ..f.--:.:,..L.,.-31L[7:-D. --.--//1,<,..-i:•:,)-. :.',..*:5'..„- il!,,, , • [,....:', ', , •,_ .., :" .• •_ . .=. / _,_1,• \, .. .I, . • .___ • •• • 1 gril-F.T -I-.-ill 1.,:;,..,,,-1 2 D.alt.J:i 2,),.27/ 7.'.'7,,.P.../.:,.,.....;••: ,•"•••••;•••;:''''''''''''''''.,0 6, ,,___/,,,,i..-,L----,:.‘'',••••::--:.:. II . , .•: • • " '...--; ..• \•• .. 1.-72.r•••°•-4----•:\:_,,..,--':-...'-'1; ••• . - • i__ ___ __,ii... 47 ) / i rif . : - • :i ' :___ •:ilf:•.3;.,1.:,••1.•,:., ,. _____,..,.....16: .j.:::. \:: c:e._\:::.C\•. .\-',.1,,,,,:?\...... ..... ;,.\\,,,,,,,. \‘.... , ,i'!.••• :,:iii n 4 . \. \,;\ N\ -•----NNN;',.1-:TI::;:::,;.-•;; ''.1..... : (( \\I . .1* \\ . C,>:-N.-- ''.\-\ ) - g--,------- ‘1 \\ \ , ,.,•••••,„, _!, ‘;\ I 1.1:ti '11___(11' It tir k___5 13'.'1, _11 -71Li___r) .:B NI- ••:/ ...•17.*,;'''''',.•-..•:-,.-_:•'-'7,, :,I1--._- , ..- • .•.„-:.,(4'7.3/ <PL71:1 416' ti:----1:....._•..:'31,17' .(-----.2. •2 * 4•-•••------/•II.--""/ l' ,j,', .,F,,, ,, . ---11 1-,i s,_,,2-7••,,u- -„.,;!-1-e-.--,7...2{-,.!-•'--,-•-• -. '/.,=4,- -'"'-'-'-----'.=A-.7_-,-.!•-.41,'. 7_,, ,Il• .,•.Pa rk..: f. •,(._______:::: , ___:_,.._.': B ti: ‘1.1,1.. i',.______ _____.,• ..11. • \i. ,, \ ,,,. , \\ Ili•• \s\. i\ f, \1 \ ,j;,,,,L____,,ts 1 L ,iiiil,e.gol,,i.;.tct?,,,.,_ :"..;/,,q 1 ir;-t/:;','4',-? \ -''': :BM-\,/,e ,-) . ,f''',,, ,,-' -tl t '-- - -: '.''• •'. ------L-"----.‘ ,, . 3•9.3,- -424" .1! - • •• • . • " ' 1 f -X.\ ;.1 '' ,f•,n L.,_J _ __11. f--11__IL ::i /- .?'tr‘• •;', • \ 1p, .••',,,,_' - • m- I .,..,....,, , . „. / .•-'-''''''.• • 1 ',.'oq• '7;-- 77-7",'_/,I- cc-----..,---- ,:-.-::'....-z 2, • •..,_,,_,,..._I,,••2,_ *I...+I _7.7 _ .___-%_it:....,.c:'-;:„..,...?...?(V-1,‘.11.-;-;:.•'''SS:-._:''-z-1-•••:::-:''..1.:••••'- ,•_ ) , ,,Greenwooc,5 Cerra 1 • - . .-• .•.• It . . t( ••,, .i' - '. ' \ ' ..----- II. ' ,- \ • I . „ . . • • . - -- . •" II • ‘.,•• ,,, •.,.. . '(-77371,s,.., ' -.•-.. -- --,-=•.-----. ---,.,..--,,•\•N s‘, '••- ;c n),.,-''''-11 II ' II Li ;,,/,4 44,,i,C0( ?..1..., ) -_•-5--I•. . •--... .i'l..,,,'' , .____: - \. ., ; . • ' . .r_ ,, _ ... . ••• • . . • ;1 . , : . p 4 ,.•.•-•• •,7I,r.:1.,,I\.'":.,,' - I:, i\ 1,. \ \\ 0,1 '1• • ,/ • ;•••!\•*,;.• ---'.•''. In••%••1\ ,.//\\,,itt•-4- --Int ...••• ,/ '(;;;.";,F.- -7-.‘rjr----''''5;/,,•,.• •-•--\, f --\LJ'' •il i . . ..... • \ , , , .., __•,, cl. .•-•-, . , ) •„... ./ -7--.'- - - -- --I-CT-V- - • 1 • -•' ‘\/P"•° il -,---it .,;./...„,/(7,?j,r.--'--t-7/ ._•'.;,-.;/(•:,,Ni-tioi.,,,.:‘,I,. . ....-.-.---\',••••-.-7-,,,,„--:---_.- ...._- ----K,,'•17.06 .1 1 ' ...--- - i• ---;••••,- - g•-•.--..----1-7\-2---f • , . . .. . . , ., - ••:....., .-.--,S'.;:,...•._...;,\ „, .; ,, \ ,1 ‘,\ \ '•"---- ---"7 : • 1';!'.••'• ' • -'\''''1..--1 .- I.' ! \''. \ \'; ' \ \‘ ', :'• \ 1 -----„,..: s .1,, ) \ 1 1 ;•• -• • , • , '•••, N . • . _ ., . . ...,,r...N., ,,,Iii, ', ,/.,,, ••••:•, (•••.•,•_, 1,.1 1 „ .3-i.,1 • 7 . . \• • :y_:::,...i.•....,.,•,.,,•::,.!.._-_-_-: • \ N. : .-, .... , 2,, ,, , ., \ s.,.1 /1 / 's.',.. ..ir..'!--, ) '...'-.'_'1.2 J._,i-'•-•-.. ••••'.';3:5•-•'=a-...); • I , • ' ' .' • e. -\V.:,,,,,..4.=gr....,..Prrkww,-,17-+F9_,-,,,7.4,..,e--,:-.1-i-=--.-. ....,:e. •\,,•-,..,:•,..-,,,,,-1,-,-, . ,.=..., ,,,- ,,-.1.9-czpr, • If . . , )- . . . .. :, I.: v. •;• . , i -. , . ., .. \ \ i • f. ••,,,N, . \I- 1I, ._i;-•‘.. \°::, .., , '; l' ••• 4 -..../ • 1,(''RA VEJ • PI r,-- . • se, j1 0 • •-- • / \ '."\ ; */)-=' ,1 , ': -11-,\\ i--.:..-:-.=•. f-\- -•-f-,.-..- . 1 ii \_.ib'• ' 5 •--•1•4., 'tl °\,',2,2f-..2, - ,j7t)'' '• :el'\H-\\:r.. .71----‘s- (.:''--;'''-'-c. 1:'-‘-1--: '83N121.':/..\.' \.\- . •11(' c ' -- :1'.: .: .• •II', ) 1..: *. ' " '..`-.--:,;.t3'''.-r.A:7-‘...!".-i\A' ,* •'..--\ % , t.'. ...r-••••••• .•---. .-- \ --,-.T._,L _0 v, ..!,-,-, ''..'•:;., . • ...- -- • • • ' (I?) I,.-,..- ,-...:::4?„.•-..-‘', ci. •V:,:;;•<',t ,-, .1,-n• ,' ..--)..‘, . 1,-1-&-•.„ \ , -•• -. -'‘I\--'':--r'-- .- ....\ '-`g \1,, !:\ • • • .. v '•°I• - '!,.' ":\.-,',N :='-;V•-• •• \ ' \ \ k • ', ..\. i___-_,r-i ,•,--p,e,,,_,.H.-.„,.,- , ,„,,,. - „ ., ---: ., 1 , . . ---9 . , ,,....,,.., „ - 1, • ., - -.c..../7..i•-•--; N • `-.• k I___I i -',• . ' ' ' !`... n 14: ::•••••:a‘.!...:_--.)-•••Z- • ' .• "1 C• ' : :1'• 14 „ . ,•-. • •••,• _7...., ,.., /1 , , \,\ \,. ..''\.:,\.--"-:•:,..\ ..,,•...---Itq),:•-•,,,I''',1a,tri'2,1t-rIl•-•;"1 . *'•',k>1,•*.:', "•.:•.,,,,:•••-,,•,•: •••--,-"-•-•-•,--„ •••••,.\:,,,f,•-",,•;,`J--.‹. •,-,\,1-••,---.------„?..)„•.7,,,--:‘',..'_-,...I.L.'(„•: ,---......, ,,,.--:,;;;-;',.. , 1!:,_;-----.,-.•1...-•• „ • •• . ; :: :I, ' ., •' - , , • - ••- •\ 4.,, • • ‘ • •. „',•,\i •1 •' ..; ...•: .... •-k,4--- JI 1;7111. „I\:11:7 •-,'z.`,•,,•“-,-. -:••••••,,-'"?.,.•) ••••;\' •"---,-..:„.;_, A,•1\... ,, :,,, ..5,(--;.,,,-;.-,,,•-•-)---,_-_,;•;,-,-..----,_11...,_‘-.-.r•,:,.;).. I.',)„...,,..,-,;s:.:.. : /• „. . : f\ ; _ ; ' •r•- • '••••% 11 •:•,. • • \ ••It• \ \\\j ,..,\'•\ '„tr, • -.---:::*,-.' 1 \ •-•\----'••"' i -•\--.- (---1-1-7? )' . • .• '•,::'• i t • •1 ' .../ • . 1 • " i• -•• ' . .is1FAc.,,i,:,-:, . ,,•i v ,,,-, ,, •-•-.„, •-..,.... ,..- •. c, •--,.\- ....,•: - . N''''''' - ..'‘ .• .•‘..‘7' ; •'' \''''' I '. '''\•‘ t,\ ,, , - ii;.:_4,,k,,,9,,i/KJ.; >71t:::.- ': -••• "•:-... "---;.!,•'''?-,;``,, ' ''',V ,),, •°."‘-., ),..\t•i -'' . ,...„: ;:,I ,)•.--_-, •,,- ,•••, I, , . Ig,:.• \ •-,' N1N j --,--,,- '-'::_•:, • • • •:•-7/••-•= 41:_t,L„)4-I •/..1 ",'1;•.•,'... '_°. ' .•-• ';`'•'"? -!•,••• / •\1 1:.• ••,;°!?:.-`,z-,.."/"•;;_-•:-• - .-7:-......::,'............... ,.,•,'.-44',,-_-_-•,J.:f,;•,,! ''---'• 1. :. • • - -•••--- ,,,.......:34,3-,:•,:,.:-:, .:.•,,'• '....;11. .„, „ . I, •,...,,- --,.,; ... ,. q:„.. 11 I/ '••• I ,.../- • 26.,....'" ' •••-•-,-e •-• . •: •••.„ •• •-kt--..,-!,------„.. • .,,,,-----T------t - • --•••••.• ,,.,•,----.---„,,,Iss.•,, ) ‘A'-• 11. *). )11:. j' 'It'`•'•j;••A^\--.:.•,-,••i ,, ...,4,- -,, • ., - i , ......., - 1 ... ,1. p ,r 011 pi JI.-,..•,* .. • •' . -', -.",'''(..;`•:.,..; ".-- , • '• : -- . --.„... `•::•••:::::...••••••••...::::.....:-,:<,-,,T.::-_-_:.\,t1::,..:, __ 1: - ' b 4t,....,n 7,.i . :'. • ' ,;.. . . . \• • . ' S, '• . • . '‘., h : ii \ ..... • . . .. p •:•.i.l•in •,,,"f•ii,•- -•'•" ." --• - ,-••••••-•---_, - ",,,-----•- ' • -\ • •-•._:•••••••,..-±y--::_::::2-F.7.-.../.• 7: . .._ • ,...., .. / . .... b i • I/ 0 ... . , II V, \\ .?,• ‘ 1.!:S'... ''....C. ,-‘c 7.1';''''..:" 0\ :I; .\ . j i'I..,!':.... ... '. . . 'i..''. "'"•-•ii : ••,-'•,;.,,I ..:I,•:•il. : -.-. . . . . ' i4‘:.: / II ' ,,,,ii,(i • .,,<.. i,, :. i •ki: ..•"1 s!. r . . •.• • \ ... ,, ..)--...JN ',„ ,\, ,_\•,..'': , ;!-: \ \., • N ...\. 1. . . . ;,,,1 .: \ •. • ...- i,•• •• • , : • i \\ s\ )f-')s)',.\IL!.• ' .'\...; ..,•••• \ .•,I\/ .1- • •• - , • . ..\'' • , , ( „ .. ‘ .,1 , .,..___ .„._.._ _ ',,-•PI 0 frit if 1,', 1..7.:',i....-i-.,`, -t-' ..., ,,..t., -, _ - ,•,. „ t'.t ,..... . -. - , . . .° ' .. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA SWC Sunset & Duvall Renton, Washington Pursuant to: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 Chapter 43. 21c, Revised Code of Washington SEPA Guidelines, effective January 16, 1976, Chapter 197-10, Washington Administrative Code City of Renton Environmental Ordinance Ordinance #3060 EXHIBIT NO. DQ 119- 7 ITEM NO. oz e.�.,., RECEIVED City of Renton Planning Dept. Municipal Building CITY OF RENTON' Renton, Washington 98055 HEARING EXAMINER JUN 2 81977 AM PM1 7,8,9,10,1111211,2i31415,6 A � pF � , ::-v . o 4. „ , :� THE CITY OF RENTON L MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 io :e., CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5‘. 235-2550 TFD SF Pi-�O r June 17 , 1977 RE : FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA RENTON , WASHINGTON Dear Recipient : This document is the final environmental impact. state- ment ( EIS ) for the proposed Central Highlands Plaza Shopping Center rezone and site development. The review period for the draft statement expired on May 25 , 1977 . The final EIS is written in the form of appendixes to the draft statement . It is necessary to have both • volumes for a complete document . Review of the draft statement by interested agencies and persons has been appreciated by this department . - - Thank you for the information provided through your responses . • • Very ruly yours , rdon Ericksen Lanni Director GYE : MLS :wr SUMMARY Nature of this Report: Final Environmental Impact Statement. Lead Agency: City of Renton, Washington Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Responsible Official: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Planning Department Contact Person: Michael L. Smith Associate Planner Phone: (206) 235-2550 Action Sponsor: Loveless/Powell, Inc. Proposed Action: The action sponsor has requested approval by the City of Renton for a rezone from G, General Classification District, to B-1, Business District, and R-2, Residence District. Said rezoning would allow sponsor to receive necessary building permits for construction of a shopping center and 16-unit townhouse residential development. License Required: Rezone approval .- City of Renton Building permit - City of Renton Indirect Source permit - Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Various Inspection approvals - City of Renton Cost of Copies: $2. 00 each; available at the Renton Planning Department. Make checks payable to: City of Renton. Date of Issue: June 20 , 1977. -1- Summary of Environmental Impacts: 1. Increase in air pollution at the site during certain periods. (Increase will not exceed adopted State Standards. See Appendix A. ) 2. Potential increase in noise at site. (Increase will not exceed adopted State Standards. See Appendix A. ) 3. Increase in traffic. 4. Addition of impervious surfaces to site (structures and paving) will cover existing soil and potentially in- crease storm water runoff and water pollution. 5. Loss of existing vegetation on site. 6. The subject proposal could possibly impact land use in this area. This can be both a primary impact of the im- mediate project as well as a secondary impact through the stimulating effect on land use intensity in the area. 7. Increase in light and glare. Summary of Possible Mitigating Measures: 1. Careful design of parking and circulation areas to reduce traffic congestion and vehicle idling times . Dispersed access points around the shopping center will assist in minimizing pollutant concentrations. -2- 2. Dust resulting from construction work can be minimized through proper water techniques. 3. Location of structures may assist in reducing traffic related noise from adjacent properties. The use of properly maintained equipment will help reduce noise levels related to on-site construction. 4. Proper traffic control techniques, including proper access, traffic lights, well-designed parking and cir- culation will help in reducing the potential traffic impacts. 5. Proper storm water retention and oil/water separation facilities can be utilized to reduce the impacts of storm water runoff and water pollution. 6. Provision of sufficient landscaping and saving signifi- ' cant existing vegetation where possible will reduce im- pacts due to loss of vegetation on the site. 7. Proper landscaping and shielding of lighting will reduce impacts of light and glare. 8. Impacts on land use can be reduced through proper site planning, buffering, screening and access controls. Secondary land use impacts can be reduced through proper comprehensive planning and zoning controls. Proposed R-•2 residential zoning within southerly portion of the subject site will create a residential buffer area be- tween proposed shopping complex and adjacent residential area. -3- Summary of Alternatives: 1. The "No Action" alternative. 2. Same project at different site. 3. Project of lesser scope. 4 . Project of greater scope. -4- RECIPIENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT (*Asterisk denotes a response to the draft EIS was received. ) FEDERAL AGENCIES Advisory Council on Historic Pres. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Office of Architectural & Environmental Preservation Environmental Affairs Department of Agriculture Puget Sound Power & Light Co. Soil Conservation Service Renton Tribune Community Services Administration The Renton Record Chronicle Environmental Protection Agency* Renton School District Dept. of Housing and Urban Dev. Greater Renton Chamber of Comm. REGIONAL AGENCIES Ms . Liz Greenhagen Mrs . Daniel L. Nydegger Metro* Eleanor D. Keitzman Puget Sound Air Pollution Control* G. N. McComas Puget Sound Governmental Conf. James W. Hazen Washington Environmental Council Robert C. Steger STATE AGENCIES Roy R. Kyle Commerce & Economic Development L. Stevens Department of Ecology* Michael E. Fleming Department of Highways* Lester Lohr Department of Natural Resources Perry Ridgley Office of Community Development* Anton A. Altoff Office of Public Archaeology Renton Cong. of Jehovahs Witness Inst. of Environmental Study Manager, Honeydew Apartments Inst. for Environmental Studies Manager, Honeydew Too CITY AGENCIES Resident 1315 Duvall Ave. NE, Renton 98055 Director of Planning Bellevue Planning Department Director of Planning Kent Planning Department COUNTY AGENCIES Mr. John P. Lynch, Director Dept. of Budget & Program Dev. Councilman Mike Lowry Ms. Gayle Wright Housing & Community Development Dept. of Public Works, King County* -5- Table of Contents: Page Summary 1 Recipients of the Document 5 Table of Contents 6 Introduction 7 Appendix A 8 Section 1 : Air Quality 9 Section 2 : Traffic and Circulation 14 Section 3: Land Use 17 Section 4: Noise 21 Section 5: Alternatives 24 Appendix B 27 Comments by Agencies on draft EIS 28 Response to Comments 35 -6- Introduction: This final environmental impact statement is written in the form of an addendum to the draft EIS which was cir- culated in May, 1977. It is necessary to have both vol- umes for a complete document. Additional copies of the draft statement may be obtained from the Renton Planning Department for $2. 00 each. Appendix A contains five (5) sections with expanded discussion of issues which a number of respondents felt were not adequately addressed in the draft statement. Appendix B contains seven (7) comments on the draft statement which were received and the responses to those comments . -7- • APPENDIX A This Appendix contains five (5) sections with expanded discussions and additional information regarding issues which were of concern to several respondents. They are in order of appearance: Section 1. Air Quality Section 2. Traffic and Circulation Section 3. Land Use Section 4. Noise Section 5. Alternatives to the Proposal -8- Section 1. Air Quality. We regret that this portion of the statement was inadver- tently omitted during the printing process. The following is the discussion of air quality which was intended to be included in the draft EIS. Data utilized by Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency in its review of an Indirect Source Permit for the subject proposal is also included in this section. Air Quality. Existing: The area is located within the Puget Sound Basin • which has a typical Pacific Coast marine climate. Tempera- tures are generally mild and precipitation moderate. The average monthly temperature ranges from 40°F in January, to 65°F in July. The average annual temperature is 50°F. Pre- cipitation averages approximately .33 inches annually. Wind speed is relatively moderate in the area with the pre- vailing direction from the southwest. It is expected that the wind conditions on the site will be similar to those typical of this region, prevailing out of the south-southwest during the winter and out of the north-northwest during the summer. -9- Existing air pollution in the vicinity of the site is due primarily to carbon monoxide from existing traffic on adja- cent streets and surrounding human residential activity. Environmental, Impact: The major pollutant from the proposed center will be carbon monoxide associated with an expected in- crease in motor vehicle activity. Approximately 480 parking spaces will be provided for the shopping facility. The nation- al standard for particulate matter is 75 micrograms per cubic meter. The standard established by Washington State Department of Ecology is 60. Monitoring stations in the City of Renton have been experiencing 30 to 40 micrograms per cubic meter, well below the 6,0 micrograms standard. Although there will be increased traffic resulting both from the operation of the shopping center and from increased traffic volume on the road- ways , the impact of these additional pollutants will be negli- gible in terms of air quality standards, except under "worst case" conditions. There are no noxious odors, nor any heavy concentrations of smoke or fumes associated with the proposed development. Depending upon weather conditions, - there would . be temporary dust associated with construction of the project. This will be mitigated by using water control and other methods to reduce dust. -10- An "Application For Review of an Indirect Source" is being filed with the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency by the applicant' s consultant, Douglas Mulvanny/Architects. A 24- hour traffic volume study conducted in 1976 revealed that there were 9, 545 cars per day passing the site on Sunset Boulevard and 3, 009 cars per day passing the site on Duvall Avenue. It is estimated that by 1980, average, daily traffic volume (A. D.T. ) will range from 11,500 to 13, 300 on Sunset Boulevard and 3, 600 to 4,200 cars per day on Duvall Avenue N.E. The proposed shopping center is anticipated to create 1, 800 ve- hicle trips on an average day. The proposed multi-family units (approximately 16 units) will produce a total of approximately 160 vehicle trips per day. The contents of that application and the related "Traffic Study" are on file with. the City of Renton. The application will be thoroughly reviewed by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and their comments will be available at a future date. Supplemental Air Quality Information: Supplemental air quality information is presented in the form of the Indirect Source Carbon Monoxide Analysis prepared by Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. As can be seen by this analysis,' the proposed project, although increasing carbon monoxide concentrations from the existing 2. 0 mg/m3 to approxi- -11- mately 3. 0 mg/m3 for an eight hour period, will not seriously approach the air quality standard of 10 mg/m3. The site location on the pleateau, relatively free of topo- 'graphy which would reduce air circulation, as well as .the relative low intensity of both commercial and residential land uses, are important factors in determining the minor air quality impacts on the proposal. Central Highlands Plaza Indirect Source Carbon Monoxide Analysis Maximum Estimated CO Concentrations 1978 (mg/m3) Caline I Model EMP2 Model Case I: Receptor A-60° Wind Peak Hour 5.4 5.3 Peak 8-Hour 3.2 3.4 Case II: Receptor B-10° Wind Peak Hour 5.0 4.6 Peak 8-Hour 3.0 3.0 The above values include background concentrations of 3 mg/m3 (peak hour) and 2 mg/m3 (8-hour) and estimates shopping center at full usage in 1978. Receptor A is located immediately west of the center; B is located imme- diately south of the center. The air quality standard for carbon monoxide is 10 mg/m3, not to be exceeded more than once per year. Diminishing or Mitigating Measures : Obvious mitigating measures for reducing air quality impacts are related to national and state standards for control of automobile emis- sions. Other precautions should include proper design of -12 4 streets, intersections, parking areas, access points , and cir- culation in and around the subject site, thus reducing vehicle congestion and idling times. A new 5-phase signalization sys- tem with 8-phase capacity is proposed for installation during the summer of 1977 at the intersection of N. E. Sunset Boule- vard and Duvall Avenue N. E. (138th Avenue S. E. ) . Dust from construction activity can be controlled through proper water techniques and operational controls. -13- Section 2. Traffic and Circulation. Existing Conditions : The air quality discussion included in Section 1. of this Appendix presents existing and projected 24-hour volumes for. those portions of both Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N. E. that are adjacent to the site. These should be helpful in reviewing potential- traffic increases as a result of the proposal. Existing volumes are presented in Exhibit K which appears at the end of this section. Environmental Impact: The Estimated Traffic Volume for the proposed shopping center is approximately 1, 800 to 2, 500 ve- hicle trips per day. The sixteen proposed multiple family units will create an additional 160 vehicle trips per day. The Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency estimates a peak Christmas volume of approximately 6, 700 vehicles for a 24-hour • period. Both N. E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N. E. have been recently improved. The 40,000 vehicles per day mentioned in the draft statement was simply the design capacity of each of these facilities. Signalization is planned during summer, 1977, for the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N. E. Exhibit G of the draft statement represents the preliminary site plan for the proposed development. This -14- plan gives an indication of the proposed access , parking, and circulation elements. It appears that the existing street system with the proposed signalization at the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N. E. will be more than adequate to handle the anticipated increase in traffic generated by the subject pro- posal. However, the importance of the signalization project must be emphasized. Without this significant traffic problems could be anticipated. Traffic impacts on other streets in the. area will be minimal. Certain streets may exhibit increases or decreases in usage due to changes in routes to the new shopping facility in lieu of previous travel patterns to existing shopping areas. The road along the westerly edge of the subject site extending from the Honeydew Apartments to Sunset Boulevard N. E. will probably experience an increase in traffic due to utilization of the shopping facility by the residents of the apartments. Trucks will serve the back of the buildings at the south end of the subject site for loading/unloading activities. This may cause minor problems although the ground level of this area will range approximately 5 to 10 feet below the proposed multi-family units, thus creating a suitable separation from -15- adjacent uses. However, additional "buffering'! in the form of fencing and landscaping will be necessary between the shop- ping facility and the proposed residential units. Mitigating Measures: The recent improvements to N. E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N. E. , together with the signaliza- tion at the intersection, are the primary elements which help to mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed . project. Ad- ditional planned street improvements and access points will also help reduce future. traffic problems. The proposed multi-family residential, with sufficient screening, fencing and landscaping, together with the location of the structure, will also serve to lessen the impacts of the parking and traffic movements from adjacent land uses to the south and southwest. Care in the de- sign of the parking layout. and landscaping around the perimeter of the site and within the interior of the parking lot will control traffic circulation, access, and reduce the visual and noise impacts associated with this activity. -16- I Coati FiELD1- A®. m -1-1-31AF FIG TA2,UL_ATIo1----1 co PAST YEA PI — I9710 . t t�" AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC �� ' 2ttN3�Z�NN . , 4 ft .:r L,................. .: bi (//,.74 /0_ .:.- e..-01e) it. \ . . 0 • '31- 59 . (4) . G �J 'TALL . • N U la In • I--; '1 -- - el. e � . w` . _ PRO P0ED �� of; SNOf�PINC3 GENTEr pi a. . 'J' w ill —I a1 •O' ---- —— — ,R H QI \F1 Q !LI I FU• TLk-aE_ t.Eaic4T-r'c'� ST PYNTATT "Fit Section 3. Land Use. Existing Conditions : The approximate northerly half of the subject site is presently undeveloped. The southerly half of the site contains two single family residences together with appurtenant structures. These structures will be removed dur- ing the construction phase of the project. The site is located at a major intersection with commercial uses presently located at the other three corners. Several multi-family residential developments are located on the north side of Sunset Boulevard between Duvall Avenue N. E . (138th Avenue S.E. ) and Union Avenue N. E. (132nd Avenue S.E. ) . An existing access road is located along the westerly edge of the subject site. This is utilized as an alternate access to the 300± unit apartment complex (zoned R-3 on Exhibit E of the draft statement) located adjacent to the southwest corner of the subject site. Forty-eight feet of combined roadway and powerline easement is located along the southerly edge of the subject site. An existing church is located south of this easement area with 1 its parking lot located directly adjacent. Several existing single family residences are located south of the church. These residences presently attain access by an existing ease- -17- ment road extending north across the approximate middle of the site to Sunset Boulevard. The applicant plans to develop the area within the existing powerline and road easement to provide access to Duvall Avenue N. E. for these residences as well as the proposed multi-family units. Environmental Impacts: The impacts of the proposed project on land use in the area are best described as primary and secondary. The primary impacts of construction and operation of the facility are related to the increase in noise, traffic, and non-residential structures to the area. The nearest residential structure is the Honeydew Apartments . There may be a slight increase in noise and traffic in the apartment area, but this will be primarily caused by establish- ment of new patterns through utilization of the new shopping area by persons residing in the complex. The proposed multi- family units will be directly adjacent to the northeast from these existing apartments. - These land uses will be com- patible with the actual density of the proposed structure and substantially less than that of the existing apartments. These proposed low density units should also be compatible with the church use located south of the subject site, and will create a low density multi-family buffer or transitional area between the proposed commercial activity and the existing single family residence area to the south. -18- The secondary impacts of the proposal will be to stimulate additional development in the area. This will probably consist of a mixture of commercial, multiple family and single family residential uses. The undeveloped area west of the subject site may be affected in this manner relatively soon, but for the most part, much will depend on continued demand and favorable money market. The area south of the subject site within King County is designated as single family resi- dential, zoned SR, and designated as single family residential on the City' s Comprehensive Plan. This .area could experience additional subdivision activity. Property is presently located north and east of the subject site across the intersection of Sunset Boulevard which is undeveloped or developed to an existing low intensity but may, as a result of the proposed development and existing growth pattern in the area, develop to higher intensity commercial and multiple family uses. A copy of the Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan is provided as Exhibit D of the draft EIS. Existing zoning information is provided as Exhibit E in the draft EIS . Mitigating Measures: Mitigating measures for the subject con- struction and operation of the proposed development include proper control of construction techniques, watering of the site for dust control, and control of construction hours. As men- tioned in other previous sections, a well planned parking, -19- access and landscape/screening plan will be important in reducing impacts to adjacent land uses. The provision for the low density multiple family buffer, to- gether with the proposed access roads along the southerly and westerly borders of the site, will serve to isolate the commer- cial activity, thereby limiting encroachment into existing residential areas. The topography of the site is such that the commercial activity will be lower than the level of nearby residential uses. This reduces the impact of the buildings and related activity as well as making it easier to screen with landscaping and fencing. Secondary land use impacts can be reduced through proper comprehensive planning and zoning controls, to insure managed compatible growth and development. • -20- Section 4. Noise. Existing Conditions: Washington State Environmental Noise Standards were presented in the draft EIS. Existing noise readings were taken on the site in four locations on or adjacent to the subject property shown in Figure 1. Values obtained are shown in Table 1. TABLE I EXISTING NOISE LEVELS IN dBA L10 L50 L90 Site 1. 67 60 52 Site 2. 56 52 50 Site 3. 57 53 48 Site 4. 58 55 49 These noise readings were taken on June 8, 1977, between 4 :00 and 5 :30 P.M. with a Quest 215, Type 2 Sound Level Meter cali- brated with a Quest CA-12 Sound Level Calibrator. The weather was mostly sunny, temperature about 65°F, with winds less than 5 mph. Site 1. was located approximately 60 feet toward' the center of the site from the intersection of N. E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. and obviously showed the highest readings . Traffic fluctuated due to signalization along Sunset west of the site. Occasional trucks or cars with defective mufflers -21- produced noise levels of approximately 70-75 dBA. Site 2 . was near the -center of the site. Birds in existing vegetation near the site interior created some fluctuation in noise levels , although traffic noise along Sunset Boulevard still created a majority of the higher readings, and had an overall effect on the noise readings at this point. Site 3. was located approxi- mately 60 feet from Duvall Avenue N.E. near the southeast cor- ner of the site. The lowest L90 was recorded at this location primarily due to the distance from Sunset Boulevard and the relatively low traffic volume along Duvall Avenue N.E. Traffic noise fluctuated greatly. The adjacent church was inactive at the time the readings were taken. Site 4. was located near the southerly end of the access road to Honeydew Apartments at the southwest corner of the subject site. Elevation is very simi- lar to Sunset Boulevard and the effects of traffic noise along Sunset Boulevard were apparent in the survey results. Occasional traffic along the access road also created some higher readings. Environmental Impacts : The proposed development is expected to increase noise levels by approximately 2 to 8 dBA, depending on the location on the site, traffic volume, and the location of the receiving property. Noise readings were taken on and near similar commercial developments along Sunset Boulevard in the existing highlands shopping center. Average sound levels ranged -22- from 52 dBA behind the store and adjacent to an existing resi- dential area, to 62 dBA within the store parking lot approxi- mately 60-70 feet from Sunset Boulevard. Given the distance of adjacent residential uses from the subject site, the proposed low density multi-family buffer, the relative lower elevation of the proposed commercial area from existing adjacent land uses, and the location of the main structure between the parking and access areas and the adjacent properties, the noise impacts will probably be minimal. However, higher noise levels will occur within the site and immediately adjacent to it, diminish- ing as the distance from the site increases. Mitigating Measures : The site and location characteristics noted above, together with the building location, will assist in reducing noise impacts. Proper site planning and screening may help control noise to some degree. Properly maintained equipment, suitable equipment operational techniques, and ' control of construction hours will help to reduce certain noise levels related to on-site construction. -23- 1 %.(-i • l2 i ‘11 4 IC) . 1 IDODO y.f... r. ----„,-,L-1----; sot. J. )0 0 0 do • .111" IA' %.• 0 t i 1 1 1 1 I It- c) 1 site 2 C1_1 0 0 .1 . 41 6• ' W 'sf-z-z_-_---=•:-. ' 'It ft' Ir. 1 I A 'I S ite 4 ,1 • se new 7 °444 R rg NIZMUIrfa 05111°. • , - I 6 14swey1VA) A . • Si 3 • . • 0 CAultOl 1111 , 4131 0 0 , • 0 C3 ----TV0.-0. 0C10 pit 6uRE a, o axisTit.14 moisE READDA Lot,d..°T-10146 * , DOD 0 0 El lif CI 0 ' 44 -IF • l . • n - 0 r---F7 Section 5. Alternatives to the Proposal. The "No Action" Alternative: A decision not to approve the subject rezone and permit construction of the development as proposed would leave the site in its present state for an in- definite period. Although this action would temporarily delay conversion of the property to a more intensive use, it can be reasonably assumed that the property would be developed at some point consistent with the City' s Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The timing of such future development would depend upon con- tinued growth in the area, and favorable financial and money- market elements. This action would also delay all of the en- vironmental impacts discussed in this report, but because of the increasing demand in the general area, it can reasonably be assumed that similar developments would be constructed in the near future, either on the site or at other locations. Alternate Location: This alternative would have similar effects on the subject site as the "no action" alternative. Location of the proposal at another site may cause a 'reduction in environ- mental impacts due to different circumstances and characteris- tics at such an alternate locations. However, there is also a good possibility' that the project may cause the same or perhaps more substantial impacts at an alternate location. There exists no other site that is zoned Business within the service area -24- (primarily northeast Renton and the surrounding County area) intended for the subject commercial facility. (See Exhibit E, Zoning Map for area. ) The Renton Comprehensive Plan does in- dicate other possible commercial areas, but, as previously stated, the impacts would more than likely be similar. Project of lesser scope: The site could be developed with less intensive uses such as multiple or single family residential with a reduced commercial area. This would, however, create some similar impacts. The single family residential area would probably create the least impacts, although economically and aesthetically this use would not best be located at the subject site. The multiple family use would possibly have some lesser impacts than the proposed use, but would also create some dif- ferent impacts related more to social situations. Depending upon the ultimate density of such a use, traffic impacts could be similar and possibly more constant. There may also be a similar amount of total building area for such an alternative, although it would be dispersed more throughout the site. One of the ramifications of not utilizing a sufficient amount of property at a major intersection for such a commercial use is the possible creation of strip-commercial activity along the arterials. The commercial uses are needed as support facilities for the residential community, and it is important that they -25- are properly located to create as little adverse traffic, en- vironmental, and aesthetic impacts as possible. Project of Greater Scope: This alternative would have the obvious effect of increasing use intensity of the site, thereby increasing most of the impacts accordingly. This might include utilizing the area proposed for the low density multiple family buffer for commercial activity. This would not be a desirable alternative especially with regard to the resultant traffic, noise, and visual impacts on the nearby residential properties. It would also not be acceptable from a land use planning re- lationship, because of the incompatible interface created be- tween the highly intensive commercial use and the low intensive single family uses. The planned topographical break between the commercial and residential uses would also be eliminated. -26- • APPENDIX B COMMENTS BY AGENCIES RESPONSE TO COMMENTS -2 7- • RESPONSE NO. 1 U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION . JENCY Jt,,/eo si . REGION X Arlk 1200 SIXTH AVENUE o SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 Zits PZr;\43 RO REPLY TO ATTN OF: M/S 623 ti may °� ��. , Q�rF!'I n o\ Ti.LUL��U \, 'WAY 2 0 /977 2;, ��,�,Y 23 I9?-. � Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen '° \r- A / Planning Director -7 4� The City of Renton �� Municipal Building N� pE R � 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Ericksen: We have completed reviewing your draft environmental impact statement on the proposed Central Highlands Plaza and we would like to submit the following comments. . Measurements of the ambient noise levels should be included in the draft statement. This information should state the increase in • noise the neighboring residences will receive from the new shopping center. Will the residences being built behind the new shopping area receive any adverse noise from operations at the stores and nursery? Time of construction should be limited to normal working hours in order to create minimum noise impact on nearby residences. • We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this draft environmental impact statement. Sincerely, QQ rJ• c1 Alexandra B. Smith Director Office of Federal Affairs y M,tir, —28— L, V �r,y r '':t,c--,;` RESPONSE `, r' E • •:,; ,; 410 West Harrison Street,P.O.Box 9863 (206)344-7330 r �'r Seattle,Washington 98109 • a, �:; :a V- f r, 1977 � ,l r: Mr,: May 17, -.. F R Mr. Gordon Y. Eri cksen / O NT Planning Director ,. ONt.1) H y City of Renton /:V , Municipal Building MAY 19 1977 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 \A _-_,�......— ----45 Subject: Central Highlands Plaza 94/ # iviNG DV Dear Mr: 'Ericksen: • We have, reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the rezone and development of the Central Highlands Plaza, to be located at the southwest corner. of Sunset and Duvall. Our comments are related to the - air quality aspects of the statement and project. We believe that the air quality coverage in the statement is not adequate, particularly for a project of this scope since it is not mentioned. It is one of the listed items in the elements of the physical environment (Exhi- bit 11P"). We note that the shopping center will provide 495 parking spaces. Under the present indirect carbon monoxide source standard of this Agency, the sponsor will be required to apply for an Indirect Source Order of Approval to this Agency, 'prior to the commencement of construction at the site. Information on that program can be obtained by contacting either Mr. Ander- son or Mr. Pearson at 344-7334. Very truly yours, ' A. R. Dammkoehler SERVING. - Air Pollution Control Officer KING COUNTY 410 West Harrison St. A_ Seattle.98109 9863 12061344.7330 r/ KITSAP COUNTY - " sines (16(tafgr Dial Operator for Toll II Senior Air Pollution Engineer Free Number Zenith 8385 Bainbridge Island,98110 fh Dial 344-7330 - - PIERCE COUNTY - . . 213 Hess Building Tocoma,98402 -1206)383.5851 - SNOHOMISH COUNTY 506 Medical-Dental Bldg. Everett.98201 12061 259 0288 BOARD OF DIRECTORS - ' —2 9-- CHAIRMAN: Dena Laba,Commissioner Knsap County; ri��bcrt C..\:t:ters�n,htayar.Everett VICE CHAIRMAN: Gordon N.Johnston,Mayor Tacoma: Patrick J.Gall.i ner,C.m.• ,"Let:`u ny: James 8.Haines,Commissioner Snohomish County: Glenn K.Jarstad,Mayor Bremerton: n+'sr'Y ''.,•I..,m:;er it Lerge; John D.SDclimen,Kin.;C _•••y Eaacut..e Wes Uhlman,Mayor Seattle; A.R.Dammkoehler,Air Pollution Control Officer. RESPONSE m Stale •ray NO: 3 e .. r+•a'° � k• Dixy•� `` . Lee Ray - Governor W. A. Bulley - Director Highway Administration Building I O lympia. Washington 96504 (206) 753-6005 oea4Plaient of Wa'Mato";• : May 18, 1977 �\ r'! 1)r. RiED 19 1977 )i Mr. Michael L. Smith ,-C Renton Planning Department •\ q �4"jf i 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 C DES City of Renton . Renton Central Highlands Plaza Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Smith: We have reviewed the subject statement_ and following are our suggested comments: The statement should include information on the number of vehicle trips per day and design hour trips for the reviewer to judge impact of the proposal upon the existing or proposed street system. The statement .that SR 900 (Sunset Blvd.) and Duvall (138th) will . have traffic capacities of 40,000 per day is very optimistic. If this should be true, the Department would be anxious to review supporting data so that we may plan to accommodate these volumes at other locations on SR 900. It is our opinion that the proposal will affect the traffic cap- acity of local roads and streets but insufficient data is presented to judge the impact and the severity of the impact. Thank you for the opportunity to review this information. Sincerely, RUSSELL ALBERT Assistant Director for Planning and Research By: WM. P. ALBOHN Environmental Planner RA:ds WPA/WBH cc: Bogart Ashford -30- RESPONSE • NO. 4 ., f, STATE OF STATE WASHINGTON OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 400 Capitol Center Building,Olympia,Washington 98504 Dixy Lee Ray Governor- - May 18, 1977 Michael L. Smith Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Smith: Re: Draft EIS, Central Highlands Plaza rezone and development The above mentioned draft was apparently developed by the proponent, Loveless/Powell, and addresses two separate actions; the rezone of 11 acres of land, which is justified on the basis of a previous amendment to the comprehensive plan; and the development of a shopping center, which would seemingly be consistent with a commercial zoning designation. The compatibility of the proposed shopping center with the city's growth policies, as expressed in the comprehensive plan and interpreted by the zoning ordinance, is of course a local determination and we have no comments or advice to provide. As far as the adequacy of the draft EIS is concerned, we felt that it was somewhat superficial, if not inadequate, in addressing the impacts of the shopping center on adjacent residential neighborhoods and the community as a whole. If you have any comments on the above, please call me in Olympia at 753-2222. Since yours, ( . , / • Joseph E. LaTourrette Local Government Services JEL:vb -\ PGE\\iEb ° \ ii i' MAY 19 1917 .�t, ------ ---------- 9,1,E ,' ;J -31- RESPONSE NO. 5 May 17, 1977 ., RCITIIFO ) Renton Planning Department 19 1977 City of. Renton MAY > Municipal Building . __ Z `` `''�; =''"• 200 Mill Avenue South `:�y �i`� 't ' ' Renton, WA 98055 'y�G p E��i '��i "j :A"`��`Attention: Michael L. Smith Subject: Central Highlands Plaza -- Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Smith: As you requested we have reviewed this draft environmental impact statement. Although we have no permit jurisdiction, the following comments are offered in the hope that they will be useful to you as you prepare your final impact statement. 1 - From reading the impact statement, it is not clear what the "significant adverse impacts" are that caused the City of Renton to declare an impact statement necessary. An impact statement is only required when there are significant adverse impacts which the applicant is incapable or unwilling to mitigate. These significant adverse impacts should be high- lighted in the EIS.. 2 - In the introduction, the rezone should be listed as a required license. 3. The alternatives are quite lightly treated. The purpose of an EIS is to assess and weigh alternatives. You may wish to refer to the SEPA guidelines (WAC 197-10-440)(12) for guidance. Since this is a rezone, alternative sites need not be restricted to those controlled by the applicant. 4 - Our Northwest Regional Office in Redmond is available for consultation and assistance on storm-water disposal matters. As plans are developed you or the applicant may wish to contact Mr. Mark Premo at .885-1900. I hope that these brief comments will be useful to you. Please do not hesitate to contact me (206-753-6891 ) if you wish to discuss these matters further. Sincerely, _ T. L. Elwell Environmental Review . TLE:bjw cc: Mark Premo -3 2- • RESPONSE ` - NO. 6 '4 IA • , y G.f G \��l municipality of metropolitan seattle y\\Py. �1,i" L�-1� May 20 , 1977 {� L F ��. CHAIRMAN A O �� RErFI��Eo CI C.CAREY DONW AN Mr. Michael L. Smith 21� STANLEY P:KERSEY Renton Planning Department MAY 25 1977 : . ..: 200 Mill Avenue. NANCY RISING . Renton, Washington 98055 '7 "'-'---- M.F.(MEL)VANIK Dear Mr. Smith: ///G DEpPR'� ISABEL HOGAN Draft Environmental Impact Statement ROBERT L. NEIR Central Highlands Plaza AUBREY DAVIS,JR. Metro staff has reviewed the water quality and public transportation aspects of this proposal. .``.EL..vr! L. (BUD) YOUNG The proposed storm water runoff controls appear to be `HAR`EA DELAURENTI. -. adequate- and-should minimize adverse-Impacts to--surf ace- ----- - water quality. These controls are also consistent with WESuHLMAN the policy recommendations for runoff rate control in JEORGE BENSON TIM HILL the report, Environmental Management for the Metropolitan PAUL KRAABEL Area--Part II Urban Drainage.' PHYLLIS LAMPHERE `:i'AYNE D.LARKIN JOHN R.MILLER Effective July 9 , 19 77 / the present Metro bus service to RANDY REVELLE SAM SMITH Union Avenue will be expanded to run every 20 minutes JEANETTE WILLIAMS during morning and evening peak hours with hourly service during the remainder of the day: Tentative plans have EDWARD WATTON been formulated .to extend service along N.E. Sunset Boulevard during peak hours within two years . JJHN D.SPELLMAN PAUL-BARDEN RUBY-CHOW Thank' you for this opportunity to review and comment. ROBERT B.DUNN R. R. (BOB) GREIVE MIKE LOWRY Very truly yours , DAVE MOONEY TRACY J.OWEN ?E? ?BILL REAMS SI- At!....(2.4/eL,' 'JBERNICE STERN Z Peter S. Machno, Manager NAOMIE BULLOCH • Environmental Planning RELLA FOLEY Division JOHN FOURNIER,JR. PAUL NANASSY,JR. JIM SHAHAN A.DEAN WORTHINGTON PSM;ksa ' . . . . ..IJ71I(_T2 HANFORD B.CHOATE • • • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RICHARD S.PAGE • -33- • - RESPONSE _ . King County State of Washington NO. 7 John D.Spellman,County Executive °� •, Department of Public Works y' S ,S ,}} Y Jean L. DeSpain, Director aN T� - 900 King County Administration Building • • 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 . June 6, 1977 r� „.-0V RE D. • Gordon Y. Erickson, ,Planning Director jL�"•1 1 v —.• � i • City of Renton Planning Department r` -15 - _ ---- Municipal Building •\•.t" .-'1,' 200 Mill Avenue South �2�✓ _. Renton, Wa. 98055 ��NG �'~ _ . 1, • - Dear Mr. Erickson: . . . Draft EIS - Central Highlands Plaza j SWC Sunset & Duvall, Renton i A review of the subject draft by the Division_of Hydraulics shows that the project is in a very critical hydraulics area. Due to the serious problems in the Honey Creek-May Creek drainage system, restrictions and requirements similar to those required by King County Ordinances #2281 and #2812 should be imposed on the project. jIn the Inter-Governmental Agreement adopted by King County Council Motion , #2788, the City of Renton has agreed to impose all the necessary restric- i tions and requirements to stop any further deterioration and over loading of the drainage system. The project area presently provides natural re- tention which helps alleviate some of the drainage, flooding and erosion problems of the drainage system. The hydraulics study and design must: 1. Take into consideration and maintain the effects of the natural retention area. 2. Provide and maintain temporary sedimentation collection facilities to insure sediment laden water does not enter the natural drainage system. These facilities must be in operation prior to clearing and building construction, and satisfactorily maintained until construction and land- . • scalping-are completed and the potential for onsite erosion • has passed. • • 3. Provide and maintain pollution separation facilities to insure pollutants from the site do not enter the natural drainage system. . _ -34 (a) - Y • f _I •` l • ' Gordon Y. Erickson •:.: 'rt, June 6, 1977 Page Two (2) 4. Provide all the necessary maintenance easements and building setbacks, as required. If you have any questions regarding the above requirements, please contact Ed Andrusky of the Hydraulics Division on 344-3874. Sincerely, (1120/(4/ . R. HOREY, P , County Road , `ngineer DRH EA:lmw • • -34 (b) - 1. Response to U. S . Environmental Protection Agency. We have included existing noise measurements and esti- - mated noise level increases as a result of the proposed facility into Appendix A of the Final EIS . The proposed residences may receive adverse noise from the commercial activity at certain times of the day. The greatest impact will be caused by truck loading and un- loading activities behind the stores. This can be miti- gated to a certain degree by suitable fencing and land- scape buffering. The time of construction will be limited to normal working hours to minimize noise impacts on nearby residences. 2. Response to Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. Thank you for your letter dated May 17, 1977 . The air quality section originally intended for the draft statement is presented in Appendix A of the final EIS. We regret that this section was inadvertently omitted. We feel that your comments will be answered by a review of this section. Your summary of the carbon monoxide concentrations estimated to exist following construction of the Central Highlands Plaza is included as an inset in Section l of Appendix A. We have been advised that the application for an Indirect Source Order of Approval for the subject proposal was approved by your agency on June 7, 1977. -35- ° v We thank you for your comments and information- in pre- paration of the final EIS. 3. Response to Department of Highways. Thank you for your comments contained in your letter dated May 18, 1977. We regret that the section containing traffic volume estimates was inadvertently omitted from the draft EIS. A copy of that section is presented in Appendix A of the final EIS. You will find that this section comments as to estimated traffic volume in the year 1980. For further clarification, we emphasize that the 40, 000 vehicles per day was only intended to express the maximum design capacity as indicated by our Traffic Engineering Divi- sion. Additional discussion of the various traffic impacts, in- cluding effects on local streets, is •presented in Appendix A of the Final EIS.. 4. Response to Office of Community Development. Thank you for your letter dated May . 31, 1977. You have correctly observed that the proposal is compatible with the City' s Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the area. The land use impacts and certain potential mitigating measures were discussed on pages 10 and 11 of the draft statement. How- ever, additional discussion has been added as an appendix item in the final EIS. -36- 5. Response to Department of Ecology. Thank you for your letter dated May 17, 1977. Item 1. of your letter refers to your uncertaintly as to the Envir- onmental Impacts of the project which led to the decision to prepare an EIS. It was our opinion that the proposal ' s magni- tudeeincreased traffic generation, storm water runoff, noise, and potential land use implications, could have significant adverse impacts. An attempt was made to highlight the significant adverse impacts in the draft document. However, we have included ad- ditional discussion of certain critical elements in the Final Environmental Impact Statement. We regret that the printer inadvertently failed to include page 7 into the draft docu- ment. This page discussed air quality and referenced a traffic study prepared for the Indirect Source Permit appli- cation to the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. We have revised the introduction in the Final EIS, and listed the rezone as a required license. Your comment three relates to the alternatives of the subject proposal. This section has been expanded per your request and included- into the Final EIS. Although storm water disposal was a major concern, ade- quate storm water retention and oil/water separation facili- ties were listed as possible mitigating measures. Detailed plans meeting City of Renton and King County Inter-government -37- • • requirements for storm water retention and pollution separation facilities will be subject to review and approval by the City of Renton Public Works Department. • Thank you for your offer of assistance on this matter. 6. Response to Metro. • Thank' you for your, letter dated May 20, 1977 . We are pleased to know that you have tentative plans for extending bus service along northeast Sunset. An extension of service, • • even during peak hours, will. be appreciated by the citizens of our community, • • 7. Response to King County, Department of Public Works. We are. likewise. aware of the location of the project . in a critical hydraulics area. The applicant has been advised of • the requirements for storm water retention and pollution sep- • aration facilities..' . These requirements were discussed on page 3, and graphically presented in Exhibit "J" of the draft EIS. However, specific plans meeting City of Renton and the Inter-governmental Agree- ment adopted by King County Council, will be subject to review and approval of the Renton Public Works Department prior to. commencing construction on the site. • N. Suitable temporary_ sedimentation collection' facilities . will also be required during site clearing, grading and con- -38- struction phases. Required easements and building setbacks will be pro- vided prior to final approval of any building or construction permits related to the project. -39- f • S • Affidavit of Publication 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Ill,V,...,l nv , L :;',A ,y SU3JECT, HOWEVER, • ._ being first duly sworn on to that certain "Declara i.cn of Restrictive Covenar,is" dated 8/18/77, which is in- oath,deposes and says that is the of corporated herein and made THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) a part hereof as if fully set times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and forth,and which Declaration has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred is recorded in the office of to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- j Director of Records and paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, Elections, King County No. and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained 7708190846. , at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton AND FURTHER SUB- Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the JECT to substantial comple- Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, tion of the development on or before December 31, � {-.i s Washington.That the annexed is a • U. ' ' 'R •C 1980,pursuant to the Plans and Specifications as sub- mitted n�„61 �, ;,r.+ ® 3 t: by Petitioners- Purchasers,but in the event no such completion has been accomplished prior to as it was published in regular issues(and said date, then this Ordi- not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period nance shall be null and void • and of no further effect. 'SECTION II: This Ordi- of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the 1 nance shall be effective upon its passage, approval L.`- r CITY OF and five (5) days after its day of ,19 • ,and ending the RENTON,WASHINGTON publication. • •ORDINANCE NO.3152- PASSED BY THE CITY • AN ORDINANCE.OF . COUNCIL this 15,h day of day of 19 both dates THE CITY OF RENTON, August, 1977. W A S H I N•G T O N , Delores A. Mead inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- CHANGING THE ZON- • City Clerk , scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ING CLASSIFICATION APPROVED BY THE OF CERTAIN PROPER- MAYOR this 15th day of charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ff'^'" " ,'which TIES WITHIN THE CITY August, 1977. has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the OF RENTON FROM Charles J. Delaurenti first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent GENERAL CLASSIFI- Mayor insertion. CATION DISTRICT (G) APPROVED AS TO FORM: TO BUSINESS DIS- Gerard M. Shellan .l 1 / TRICT(B-1)AND RESI- City Attorney ( ; DENCE DISTRICT(R-2) Published in The Renton WHEREAS under Chapt- Record-Chronicle ... . . . ,> er 7,Title IV(Building Regu- 26, 1977. R4517 r Subscribed and sworn to before me this c i' day of , 19 i �.. ." . Notary Pub in nd for th• tate of Was gton, residing at Kent,Kin ounty. —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. • V.P.C.Form No.87 Invoice CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 CITY CLERK • Department or Division Dat tember 9�_ 197.7___ Loveless/Powell,' Inc . Please make checks Payable to 60 - 110th Ave . N.E . , Suite 105.6 Bellevue , Washington 98004 Finance Department City Of Renton • Recording Fees for Declaration of Restrictive Covenants $9 . 00 at King County Records Department Ordinance #3152 ( copy attached ) Restrictive Covenants - recording #7708190846 ( copy attached ) • • • Total Due !-:;:,,,f.;',:: , .:-,• - f• . , . , . . .... . . . . . . . , •e., •,' , '.41P': :''''''!: ;'I: I.' " . ' • ., . '-•,:•- .:-. • ' .. •'' '-', „:''''• ''' 1'" '• • ' '' "' • .. „,. ,,. — .... • • . , ':'!::egA''7,7,C:'1,'''. ' . .. _. • „ . . . . . . . .., .. . , . . , , ,.• , ' ... . ,.. . • , .:".1', ..•'?;',:•'. ,1•• . , — ., —. .' ., ',•. .e - ..„ . , . • '.. ' , ' ' . • , 1' '.. ' CITY OF FEN TON, 'W4SHIISTON . . . . . • •• • ' „ .• — . . , • .., . -':• :(jPINANE'.:10 .:—il:52 - .- - .. . .• . . . . • . . . . ., .. . , . AN c1.1DINANCT.:, .0 .Tut.:CITY OF 'RENTON,. .WASHIGTON, ' , • - ' ' • ,. . _. .• : CLASSIFICATION'. CHANQINGI:THEZONING- OF CERTAIN .- . - . , • . . TROPERTIESIII,THIN' ..THE7'CITOT RENTON FROM . . . . GENERAt, CLAS,S•TFICATION'DITRICT :(0. TO . . ... . , • . I3US;NES,a2DISTRICT .TOIAND' RESIDENCE ,D,ISTRICT.- . , . . ,. . _ . . . . , . . . . . : , • .. , , , . . • . _ _ . . : • WHEREAS under.. Chapter' 7,4„ Title IV (Building Regulations)- '.: , ,•• of Ordinance NO. 1628 ' noWn ..as. the. t!COde-:..Of General Ordinances . . '.;/'..',- '-''... , ,i'::.. . .,'•V' - . of the City •of RentOn" -, aS--atended, andthe maps and reportSadopted ,' . . . . _ ' . • .. , _ . . ,.., in conjunction .therewith, the brepertYHhereinbelow described has , :--' • . heretofore, been 4oned. as: q0neral -Classifiation District (G) ; and - . . . . _ . ., ., . - . WHEREAS aproper Petitionforchange of zone classification , of said property has been filed Withythe:Planning Department ' , . •: .-- . . . . - - -.;• • " • on or about March 7 , ' 1977,1'which: Petition: was' duly referred to ' .. _ . the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, * : H .and a public hearing having.,beehheld-thereon on or about June 213., .-. 1977 , and said matter havingbeen,dulY-.considerea . by the ,,Hearin2:. Examiner and said zoping ,reqUest :-beingHinconformity with the. Y . . , ' Cityls Comprehensive Plan; as: amended;''and the City Council having . . . . . duly considered all matters, :relevant'thereto, and all parties . . . . having been heard appearing in suPpOrtthereof or in opposition . .' .., thereto, NOW THEREFORE '- • , • . . • . . v.,,. ,. . • . . , ' THE CITY• COUNCIL..OF . THE CITY OF RENTON, -WA$HINGTON, . . DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS.: -: .: - - ' :• • ' . SECTION I :, The. following described property in the ' Cy of Renton is hereby 'retoned7to TAISiness .District (B-I) and Residence District 'ti72.) aSsi- hereinbelOw-tpeCified; the Planning Director is hereby aUthori4ed and',.directed-to 'change the maps . , • of the Zoning Ordinance,. as amended,,, to evidence said -rezoning, . • • . to-wit : . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . , . . , . . . . , . • . ., . .., ,• . . . . . • . . . . , . . . , ,... . .•, . . , • . . . 1 TO BUSINESS -DTSTRICT :.(B-71): ' Tracts No.'.--,:ECAndA,j-jOseph:-.T.',.., Narshall' .Tracts , accordingtOthe',:1,Pi;4:t:,:,thereftecOrdedin Volume 38 of Plats,1,,page:X84b0c,Ot4S40f King County, WashingtOn ' LE8heAOUth(,:-14:0feetfthereof; and EXCEPT-.-thOse',:iPOOOf1$- '06d3-64t0:for pUrposes . TO RESIDENCED.I$TRICT (R-.:2)',,,, The South 'lag feet,pf-; Tracts ',No. 8 and 9 , Joseph P. Marshall‘ TraCtS,:aCCOrdingto:the plat thereof recorded in Volume: 38 of Flats, page 30 , records of King COuntY;'. 144Shington .' :pgp_T those portions dedicated for road purposes -• (Said property located :.SouthiA70.St corner of N. E . Sunset pbu1evard,.-and :Pya11, Ave. N.E , Renton, K4ng County, „ . SUBJECT, HOWEVER,"-to that certain "Declaration of - - Restrictive Covenants" dated -8/18)71 , 1977 , which is incorporated herein and made a: part hereof as if fully set forth, and which Declaration is .recOrdedin ,the, office of Director of Records and ElectionsKing ,County 7708190846 - - AND FURTHER SUBJECT ' ta. subStantial completion of the development On or before December '31,..' 1980, pursuant to the Plans and Specifications--ap- subMitted' by' FetitionerS-Purchasers , but in the event no Such cotpletionAlas 'been accomplished prior to said date, then this Ordinance -shall be null and void and of no further effect. SECTION II: This_Ordinande.-sh4ll be effective upon its pasaage, approval and five. .-(5),'- dayai after its. Publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 15thday of August, 1977 . thZ Delore$ A. Mead, city C erk APPROVED THE 114AYOR this 1561 day 9f August, 1977 . • , • / 6c, harles Delaurenti , Mayor Appr -d as to or" C73e• --,-,:'d :M. Shellan, city Attorney Date of Publication-: = • DECLARATION;-OF'JRESTRICTIVE. COVENANTS WHEREAS, Russell Collins and his wife Iva M. Collins , Roy R. Kyle and his wife Alice L. Kyle, and Kohl Excavating, Inc. , y >' a Washington corporation, . are the owners of the following real i property in the City of :Renton, County of King, State of O` Washington; and C. E. Loveless and his wife .Joan E. Loveless Bhave contracted. to purchase the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lots 8 and '9 of: the Joseph P.`,Marshall Tracts , as per plats recorded in volume 38 of Plats, page 30 , Records of King County, Washington; except those portions dedicated for road. purposes;, WHEREAS, th eyowners and purchasers of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the follow- ing restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property;,. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish, grant, and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by:,the undersigned, their successors , heirs Ems' and assigns , as follows,: PERMITTED USES Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses allowed as follows the south 130 feet of the property shall .be.. limited to multi-family uses allowed in the R-2'y` dence District of Section 4-708, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, Cityof Renton, KingCounty, Washington. �- g The remaining northern portion of the property shall be limited to uses' allowed ..in the B-1 Business r District, ..Section4-711", Title tV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances , City of Renton, King County, Washington. DEVELOPMENT Development of the property shall be limited to a shopping center': on the northernB-1 portion of the 0 property containing the,permitted uses of theB-1 Business District, and to multi-family residential development on the remaining south 130 feet of the, property containing the multi-family uses of the R-2 Residence District, all of which.,development shall conform to the site plans, Exhibit No. 6, attached, dated April 21, 1977 or such modifications thereto or . site other . Plans the: .. r , r p ns ^w . e: Public Works and Planning Departments , City of Renton, shall have approved in writing. LANDSCAPED AREAS Landscape plans shall be prepared in conformance with the aforementioned Exhibit No. 6 , dated April 21, 1977, and applicable ordinances of the City of Renton or such modifications to Exhibit No. 6 or other site plans which the Planning Department, City of Renton, shall have approved in writing; and the landscape plans shall include: 1. Landscaping of _the'.right-of-way of all streets adjacent ?4the property that lie between the boundary -2- lines of the -property and:.. sidewalk and/or paving improvements in the right-of-way; and this landscaping shall be of the same general design, quality and quantity as that of the landscaping contained within 4n;,1 the development within .the property. 2. As many of the existing trees shall be retained as possible. 3. Intensive landscaping shall be installed along, and within the north 25' feet of the south 130 feet of © the property which in the judgment of the Planning . Department, City of Renton, reasonably exercised, shall CD fs- constitute an effective, visual barrier of at least six feet in height. 4. An' 'architectural-type .fence of six-foot height shall be constructed' on the property line separating the B-i ;and R-2 portions of the property. _ 5. All landscaping and fencing are to be installed within 90 days after construction of the shopping center buildings in the B-1 portion of the property. 6 . Parking lot areas shall be landscaped according to Section 4-2204. 8.B(3) , °,Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of. General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. STORM DRAINAGE.; Storm drainage plans shall be approved by the Public, Works Department, City of,;Renton, according to require- ments of applicable ordinances and policies of the City of Renton; and clearing. and grading of the property shall not ur until full and complete approval is, , granted or issued by said Public Works Department; EXCEPT that existing fill material previously deposited on the property may be removed. INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Along the 'west boundary of the property shall be con- structed roadway paving of sufficient width that when added to the existing roadway surface will constitue a total roadway surface. The roadway paving will comply S . OD with applicable, established public street standards per • CD Cr• requirements of the Public Works Department, City of ft Pale(1490:a 5 Renton. The ownere shall be responsible for the ad- N. r ditional paving which averages approximately ten feet (10 ' ) in width but shall not be responsible for re- surfacing the existing paving nor for maintenance of the roadway or the new paving. The south twenty feet of the south 130 feet and the west ten feet of the property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for the purpose of public access. Along the south boundary of the south 130 feet and the west 10 feet of the property shall be constructed a roadway meeting applicable, established public street standards of the Public Works Department, City of Renton, and such roadway shall connect Duvall Avenue Northeast to the roadway created along the western boundary of the property. iaLhoe6Na.6472 The -owner-9 shall be responsible for one-half of the r‘l initial roadway paving necessary for the construction of the proposed roadway but shall not be responsible for maintenance of, tfiat paving or the roadway. NL, -4-. • • Both of the above described roadway improvements shall be dedicated to the City of Renton, free and clear of all encumbrances. CONSTRUCTION HOURS Hours for construction activity outside of buildings shall be limited to the period between 7: 30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on the weekdays of Monday through Saturday. SIGNING Signs shall be approved by the Sign Design Review 23 Committee, City of Renton. aD CONDITIONS CD 1^- This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants is intended to impose restrictions on the property in connection with its development and use as a shopping center and multi-family residential development. It is not intended and may not be desirable to impose such restrictions on the property if it is not so developed and used. Therefore, if the proposed development and improvement of the property in, the manner contemplated and proposed herein is abandoned and does not occur, the restrictions contained herein shall have no force or effect. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 1990 , provided all of these covenants are fulfilled and completed in accordance herewith. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of Kftg4punty by either the City of Renton or any other' property owners adjoining described property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable -5- • attorneys' - fees incurred during an enforcement • - ' . , ' . ' proceeding will -be: borne. by ,the 'party or parties .• whom the court determines ,-is in'..error and shall be ' • entered,.as,'a. judgment in.'such,;action DATED this •/` ` day of 1977: • • ' L ate' . C. ! - Russe'll CO l�hs - • • • Iva M. Collins ' ,�. Roy R.• Kyle Alice "L. :Kyle, • formerly Alice- L. " Taylor K6hI Excavating , Inc. g. ' ; ) • • :"Kohl 'Excava;ting, Inc. C. 'E.. Loveless . . • • Joa�1 .. Love less . , r r .. Li ,, • • • -6- • • STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. County of King On this 3rd day of August , 1977 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Delores T. Kohl and Ivan C. Christianson to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of KOHL EXCAVATING, INC. the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate seal of'said corporation. • Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and-year rst above wriCfen.,- I Notary Public ii airy f or the f i ash iz tort, . W FORM 2153. ACKNOWLEDGMENT. CORPORATION ,` residing at `Renton r - NI' LkYN 1.' , — STATE OF WASHINGTON, V • 'pl.:CD County of �.y RUSSELL COLLIIIS, IVA. N. COLLIi On this day personally appeared before me R6Y R. KYLE, ALICE L . KYLE to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned. , • , < A�ti;usj.. 77 Given under my hand and official seal this r ' , day ofr-- -' ',,,,1y RENTCI4 Notary Public in and for the Slate of Washington, residing et LAWYER!TITLE INSURANCE CORP.-ACKNOWLEDGMENT-ORDINARY t. L-42 ` • • STATE OF WASHINGTON, ..- ss. v County of 1 . On this day personally appeared before me ,.,.:;- •'1 - . • to me known to be the individual "-.. .-deccriberll in and ;.'Lo executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that ' ' , signed the same as -k. purposes therein mentioned. -- free and voluntary act and deed for the Given under my hand and official seal this ' day of w.. . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORP._ACKNOWLEDGMENT-ORDINARY L-42 . 1 ' . . , '' . , . ., . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •. _- , . . • , . . . „ . . , .....,......... . ,..,• . . . • . ..._ .. .. . . . . ,... _ .. _. . '•• • . . . • • • ' .• ' . - . • " . . ' . • • . • ' . , - . • . . • , e,-..^•/... •••,.::..7.C a f-e. L.1,•:,.........71_ -• 10 M.r.-C.F.,'-'" OF-01c-i:7,-...;.TO c•rri i . . '., ---------- - ----------------- - - . • .—I- rt_ . . . . . ,-.,. , 03 . . . . ---_ ...,------------------- - -- _---.. -'-• '• ------17.1.---• , ' •• ' '---4,----T-JC-..-- rel... -,-..„---..--,„..„-:.,-- 0 . .• , 05--,-------.7.:'---77-4F t:'.-• V,"r*."'' .--..-4 ' 47'4, . C...." 3• y, -*--k'''' ' : I k I. • .. i•rn"1-F\ ....1"' _u,.: .l•-=__•_-.- --•--% --/-- --*---- - - - - ____ --‘'- ---- -1 ,: • . . . • . .- . . . • • L i ' -- j - - ,• . -.. 1 :..-' .4•. • .,,. _-T. , - i Ly.,, ' •. I t• I - 1 , ,t . ea, . , i . .• . i ! 4 1.14,tlf, ___5,,,,,:41--2 4 LAILlig5c.g• ,i ..0::-::•st 4 LP I a._! __,,,,...„,,,,,, _ .... ,t ,t , . • • ‘.117.5 1 --i...-Y :-.. -t.;):1•,,5 , l.,5,5 4 ,- • , ., . .: -.. ' ....-9••• it .,........ ... 5.'''..-••:..P-•-.1;;"-:•71•:.•5.1•i0.1 '. .' 1 . ":".•"--.-."--- •-"-----.7_-77- 3__"-------..."-:-.:.`e-•:.•;'-•• _.i._ --.'''.....'i- ::_.,-.--7- --.'t•_ ..•__- 24.5•. ...... 1..''.-t";.-7.":-:--.-': 7 .:.... -5._-/ •\••••••••:-.4:-.-- ";;) .. i''•••,..I. ..'•., 11,:::'Z.".'1••••• -;;,..:..;'''i-• .-''.1..1. ',Le.A.,.. • / ',..''-,.;,. -, `--• ••'4..4 . ........„..!..._2______L__L,f___.1..„:"....L.IY....2_-. ...--::-..... -.... '4....e...,_.::-...=.•=1....,,. .,-72-..-, -.-,.--t•".:--,,,..-.----„..., . • - --i- fs-.:1----------7."''''-' ' ' 1 • ! ' i ., . ar ..) , •. . ; j i - I i -----•---i ' . • I 4 ---)- ." \ . . •' 'i . ; '''. . .: 10,,' 1 ; ',..s.,. c• . , . -. - • . .. . ri • . T ' • ''''4''' . . . A'.: .• • ' . '. L li • i 1 . . ,.1:` • ._i Cr > ,,., • - • , . s(),EYS j : . '. , 1 • -• •_ .,:1,-..v_..,-._,--4 1 O 3 '',-. ;:. FZ-C,3 C..!f_LITE-:_7_ 0 al.:C._...-....•-21-_ t_S.?...r..1`41".721„,r77.:?-t- !II; :1 .. • i 1 •.,,..i.-f-;'-::2:' a - ....,.-v- 19.11,.5r • • L'S..334•• ....'; 1 C.•..So 0r.' --• L. . . • ' Si..&5‘" ' t4 / i .15 _ _ ______ ./.., _. __1.7_1:!_—_--f-_--,_-_ • - 5 , e ....-.. ..". O , L ii.________________j----•---------..-.---,---------- .4.!, ..,. .. • 4 ' ' _ 6 I t• ' — .e.. . • ...... • ----------- . . r . . • ..... '--- E-1---.--- - .--1•-•;.-,-- .j-;,----- re...-):7:-. ;I:---7 T-•7- I.; "•----• ---1 : I ' ,,>- . . ... • . ,•- It__1_,...- :..:;•-j.-- .1.,.::=4:- ..„_,. ,../.. .• , . , ! • I • . • • 1 - 1 1 .., .1 f..- • • Ao- P t•-•, I La,' 1 c.. 5...'_._.., _5„....____• ...,7,....._ ... .4,,=•._._.,._c.5,..•______;__5-'7. .• i •14. 1.•.! !? wr• . • i i 1 11- i > ' 1 1 •-••••., I I • 1 - i , 1.1 I ; ; I I . ! 4..' . , F) -4) ; T.,....„....s...................iji\ ;i: 1-- I 1.._.../H. 'i• . • .. . . r I . I ; . 1 . t i 4 : rr-1.2. I I I I • 1r ,!-•:, ',- I * . . ' I ! .• I. ' 1 . . 1 I , . , .......1„......), i. ' , :D :•• t :.• - • 0 '0 z . . ,.... 0 1 • _a 1 1 , ;•'>'. -':/''''..,,e1 .',...,r/I .;,/•"' i -•/-1 .Z1 .;Z: ,C' .,a.'r'-..., , /..-.., I '1: ..o • • • L. ; . . i .. L_ i. . .,..—. ....... .. . ,.c) -_I 1 —. -,-,_ ,..,-. ,L T %Z.,,,0 • (--s- 1 . , :,t3,%° - ' ' i . , V-..- •„? • . r.- -',........?,-,------ , ,--.r, ,i) -, ,!•,._-, rc.< 0 . . . - . : . . , . • -r ir- I 1%..--1 ..I _, .7-1,.._ . . .• .!,.... 1 , . • .__I ---i 1 c, 1 t) i - )__.- ...,....... ,•.:„.;-_-; . : . -- - " ' i i .' , -• 1•:_i_ .---- . c; - z:',.."`• • ....,• • 517 E PL t\•U _1 L ' C- ''- • •+.,. _/ ,0, ....• ' . I h1t:f 1 • Nr-- -.- s' ' • -_ • „..-------- ----- ----- ::•'..) IN. i;i-r-E.— g. -r i ,- i?.. - , _ •-:- Zi ;1•••.•-: --•-•-•:••'=,-:-: —` - J.,1,0,Je.• ..).-Iti-, 4 ,..,,....0—c--1.• --...i.: U•I•10 r,...:0- 1, UL.1,1,1 2.1..,./...: • ‘./.. Z t.,./,,,y • . j7...‹..,21•14, ' .f.:5P.-2•5'1,14? (-.E-!.-76-.F- ____ - 0,5,2.1 '1.,...1./.. _1•.".-E 4. ri.C.......:c.___C''':..., 5---, I ,...:0 ,...._,,„,._ .,..,,.., ._,.fr. I •ii. raxs C 1/I.., . • — ,,o i L_ECI .._ -I $4.,•,.:_,...,..,_,..c -.a.,...e .1,,nto I le.: c_--) , Ida. no 1 •f... •:; ; . •••''-. 1 , e....... :,...v - I - TaTA•1.... 4..laa.-erf 9.)..., A.,: rT• 1 ___ _•'....."'C•1 q '•'---.::""• .- 1":, 5! ... _. . •A••,• .1.,.. o--r; i. ._ ________— . -..._ • .. -• • -• .. • . • . (PRELTMT.NARY) 1-:,X i 1.J.B IT 6 • , (;) . • .i. , ,1 . ,.• • , • . . • . . . , , . . , . . . - , . . . • . . • . . . . . • . / . . . . - • . . . . - . . , .. . . . . • . . . - . . . . . . . , . . . • . . ASSIGNMENT LLOYD W. POWELL and VASHTI N. POWELL hereby transfer and assign to C. E. LOVELESS and JOAN E. LOVELESS all of their right, title and interest in and to options to purchase • the following described property from Russell Collins and Iva M. Collins , his wife, Roy R. Kyle and Alice L. Kyle, his • wife, and Kohl Excavating, Inc. , a Washington Corporation, copies of which are attached hereto. •DATED this ‘ES day of ckeiNke* , 1977 • ) •, ' • , Lloyd14.tr Rowell ' ) Vashti N. Powell STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) • On this day personally appeared before me LLOYD W. • POWELL and VASHTI N. POWELL, to me known to be the individuals • described in and who executed the within and foregoing instru- ment and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary aqt ,and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. • Given under my hand and official seal this day of 1977. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of • Washington, residing at YvAis,- DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS , Russell Collins and his wife Iva M. Collins ,. Roy R. Kyle and his wife Alice L. Kyle, and Kohl Excavating, Inc. , a Washington corporation, are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington; and C. E. Loveless and his wife Joan E. Loveless have contracted to purchase the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows : Lots 8 and 9 of the Joseph P. Marshall Tracts , as per plats recorded in volume 38 of Plats , page 30 , Records of King County, Washington; except those portions dedicated for road purposes ; WHEREAS , the owners and purchasers of said described property, hereinafter "the property, " desire to impose the follow- ing restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE , the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : PERMITTED USES Permitted uses of the property shall be limited to the uses allowed as follows : the south 130 feet of the property shall be limited to multi-family uses allowed in the R-2 Residence District of Section 4-708 , Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628 , Code of General Ordinances , City of Renton, King County, Washington. The remaining northern portion of the property shall be limited to uses allowed in the B-1 Business District, Section 4-711, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances , City of Renton, King County , Washington. DEVELOPMENT Development of the property shall be limited to a shopping center on the northern B-1 portion of the property containing the permitted uses of the B-1 Business District, and to multi-family residential development on the remaining south 130 feet of the property containing the multi-family uses of the R-2 Residence District, all of which development shall conform to the site plans , Exhibit No. .6 , attached, dated April 21, 1977 or such modifications thereto or other site plans which the Public Works and Planning Departments , City of Renton, shall have approved in writing. LANDSCAPED AREAS Landscape plans shall be prepared in conformance with the aforementioned Exhibit No. 6 , dated April. 21, 1977 , and applicable ordinances of the City of Renton or such modifications to Exhibit No. 6 or other site plans which the Planning Department, City of Renton, shall have approved in writing; and the landscape plans shall include: 1. Landscaping of the right-of-way of all streets adjacent to the property that lie between the boundary -2- lines of the property and sidewalk and/or paving improvements in the right-of-way; and this landscaping shall be of the same general design, quality and quantity as that of the landscaping contained within the development within the property. 2. As many of the existing trees shall be retained as possible. 3. Intensive landscaping shall be installed along and within the north -25 feet of the south 130 feet of the property which in the judgment of the Planning Department, City of Renton, reasonably exercised, shall constitute an effective, visual barrier of at least six feet in height. 4. An architectural-type fence of six-foot height shall be constructed on the property line separating the B-1 and R-2 portions of the property. 5. All landscaping and fencing are to be installed within 90 days after construction of the shopping center buildings in the B-1 portion of the property. 6 . Parking lot areas shall be landscaped according to Section 4-2204. 8.B (3) , Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances , City of Renton, King County, Washington. STORM DRAINAGE Storm drainage plans shall be approved by• the Public Works Department, City of Renton, according to require- ments of applicable ordinances and policies of the City of Renton; and clearing and grading of the property shall not occur until full and complete approval is -3- granted or issued by said Public Works Department; EXCEPT that existing fill material previously deposited on the property may be removed. INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Along the west boundary of the property shall be con- I structed roadway paving of sufficient width. that when added to the existing roadway surface will constitue a total roadway surface. The roadway paving will comply with applicable, established public street standards per requirements of the Public Works Department, City of Pu2cs10se e.s Renton. The owncrc shall be responsible for the ad- •P ditional paving which averages approximately, ten .feet (10e ) in width but shall not be responsible for re- surfacing the existing paving nor for maintenance of the roadway or the new paving. The south twenty feet of the south 130 feet and the west ten feet of the property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for the purpose of public access . Along the south boundary of the south 130 feet and the west 10 feet of the property shall be constructed a roadway meeting applicable, established public street standards of the Public Works Department, City of Renton, and such roadway shall connect Duvall Avenue Northeast to the roadway created along the western boundary of .the property. Put/Amae.s The owncrc shall be responsible for one-half of the 6P/ initial roadway paving necessary for the construction of the proposed roadway but shall not be responsible for maintenance of that paving or the roadway. -4- • Both of the above described roadway improvements shall be dedicated to the City of Renton, free and clear of all encumbrances. CONSTRUCTION HOURS Hours for construction activity outside of buildings shall be limited to the period between 7 : 30• a.m. and 6: 30 p.m. on the weekdays of Monday through Saturday. SIGNING Signs shall be approved by the Sign Design Review Committee, City of Renton. CONDITIONS This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants is intended to impose restrictions on the property in connection with its development and use as a shopping. 'center and multi-family residential development. It is not intended and may not be desirable to impose such restrictions on the property if it is not so developed and used. Therefore, if the proposed development and improvement of the property in the manner contemplated and proposed herein is abandoned and does not occur, the restrictions contained herein shall have no force or effect. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 1990 , provided all of these covenants are fulfilled and completed in accordance herewith. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any other property owners adjoining described property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable -5- attorneys ' fees incurred during an enforcement, proceeding will be borne by the party or parties whom the court determines is in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. DATED this /7/2A day of 0rd;e- l977. Russell Collins 4LJ--c1/4- - Iva M. Collins Roy R. Ky 62? Alice L. Kyle, form y Alice L. Taylor A01--&-a/ J.KG Kohl Excavating, Inc. 4,30 Kohl Excavating, Inc. C. E. Loveless Yvy� L Joa E. Loveless -6- • STATE OF WASHINGTON, County of King ss. • On this 3rd day of Au us't , 1.977 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared • Delores T. Kohl and Ivan C. Christianson to me known to be the President and Secretary, respectively, of KOHL EXCAVATING 3 INC. the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stat . t authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporate se of id co poration. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above writ e otary ubi c in and or the Stat -IVasra ton, FORM 253. ACKNOriLEDOMENT, CORPORATION residing at Renton STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss' - , County of KING _ � V RUSSELL COLL I1 S IVA. N. COLL `li On this day personally appeared before me PAY R. KYLE, AL ICE L . KYLE • 'to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that they - signed the same as their ffee and voluntary act a for the . purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official.seal this., day of. Au s 19 77 . Notary public in and for the Sta of Washington, residing al "h'1JTG J te LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORP.-ACKNOWLEDGMENT-ORDINARY L-42 • • • STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. County of �1•� _ ,`� : On this dayW-� Y' [I', personally appeared before me..:. - ``= .��.t-mk_.4.a...a �- i nn.. ..:. � gsLia.� to me known to be the individual.a....described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that.... . signed the same as purposes therein mentioned. a_7 •-•-•ffee and voluntary act and deed for the Given under-my hand and official seal this..... .1'_.........day of........... Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at.......\,\...._.._ ` L-42 TITLE INSURANCE CORP.ACKNOWLEDGMENT-ORDINARY , OL-o'y hi~.C,r..t uy_s _t SD P,.:;EL .iu�:a.i To crj I;i:__—_L_ • — J 71 i) 14 1 4 . --- ------ -- = i. g 'tJ 4 LNIU — — d LVII:4' 1 a1 }i: 4 LM1Iq _viz�N4— dV Y.� . 1 I. r_ I Uyr F�zu�l� ours I UtiI9 ':? I : J� i. :_ D=-�I�aT!0.1 y I 1 • r . 1. a g f•-•l ,I1 rl I . SI'� H ji I IL ■II .. II i `.�� 1- d . 3t7I JI ,C - Li r -ir��C^i��h J %+ ems.pq 11 c'-�`- 11ae.:"'1v:3��;9n- nIn • (- 4 FIX.-J G�I�-EZ DEG - O. - irl -I?'` nr• 31..oso •eF ]ID d ji 74,-I iv 9P Lei-%d4 ?. ,. `1- � f u tas o Sa as± r N o s: 1- 1 - - '----. J1 In } . ...:!›...) 17,,r.; '<„,r.i.'" ..1•7]..•' .„,PT--.- -fr7"1772'. ..l."..":>,-- L•-•--,••••-" 1,,;••-j.--- I; ',I• ni ! ' - 1 ..._.-1 -1 -.....----. .5-- I `'.fl i • ! • Z 1 I • I 4b351 Q 1 I J I I � 1 1 I - I I D z -i �\ (4:: (�• Iw•: . IS=.. P 41 -' I ' i C� O ' I i • I I u li .,, 12' I I i I,. t� c 3 ' ' I • I I I ' / F J I I / Q < I I I H 1 .7_11 --' '''' 1 . il k cl'7::::) ....:... ---..--e. 'i, . i I e1ILDILI �o . q io�__o I:, Dv o 6e off ,;; n 1 ToT�'-MgRT. 1q 1 '/ 8 - . vi�Tti A o / • I i1J _ .2.. sd / � ��n l o I I I T5'_ l.L j �� a r 1 • .- -r. �J 5I7 E PLb4 _' d 1 . L y 9 - - 5Tn7i�7ic� I C 1 511-- �� I .t s-IYIUG U..II+h - - RVTJ�.G i c ec�L 4 w1:_.o+�/5 •.'/4 U41Z5 e+.=�1- i'uthV • Q_ • S P-1IE ti'iG r'fF.1�; S / u+Kir7 • SelfPI1.1G-• ,,,e,FZ O C.[:M r5.,7o lf:.E• PLC -t.:b Qom-.:LAG • /- . fr_o cis+Trf- t 111. •-C.ff. I 1�4 c.cs £ 1/==c T 1-r oC:b s•.-r L=,000 I lI /_- LEGAL- DESGRIPTIO�...I�c.^ r. �o N4c�«r•-G 1(ta? 10..co • 1 -T. ; f1..... Ci ' , , ,q''e• ,i c .�o Dt,:t. t•aD 10.dA ' ( -._ r C ' �i �. .�e? i.e e,�w ToS1L 91,11.. -r.0 1/.._.. a [ • .•,ct;i`� ��n'�o�eP.,,a e _ +1UL-¢T 5,» -.G (T. I -oT .o .x .o o�+. TS �._ - (PRELIMINARY) EXHIBIT 6 • - ye1- . • . - 9 • REf<EIFED • • v1UG 09 1977 T OTi r TSS/POwELL, LUC ASSIGNMENT LLOYD W. POWELL and VASHTI N. POWELL hereby transfer and assign to C. E. LOVELESS and JOAN E. LOVELESS all of their right, title and interest in and to options to purchase the following described property from Russell Collins and Iva M. Collins , his wife, Roy R. Kyle and Alice L. Kyle, his wife, and Kohl Excavating, Inc. , a Washington corporation, copies of which are attached hereto. DATED this \$ day of R gqk.gk , 1977. ',/1/ Cf?41*--0,K Floyd (. Powell A'af.fh /7-724 Vashti N. Powell STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me LLOYD W. POWELL and VASHTI N. POWELL, to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within and foregoing instru- ment and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. Given under my hand and official seal this 1$ day of RVcv$N , 1977. \\a ova h-•�.� NOTARY PUBLIC in a d for the State of -. _. Jo 1 ; Washington, residing at 1S* OPTION TO PURCHASE REAL PROPERTY • • IN CONSIDERATION OF the sum of ******' FIVE HUNDRED & 00/100******* ************************************ DOLLARS ($500.00 ) , paid to Grantor, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, A /e5 1. kYLE A,2rneiet y Auce L. 7A1t og, as /tu seyaiz & sra�i , a.rd ,,Epy R. iYGE_y_. eie LLus6a d _ ("Grantor") grants to C. E. Loveless and Lloyd W. Powell ("Grantee and/or assigns") the exclusive option to purchase the real property located in the City of Renton, County.of King, State of Washington, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein together with all appurtenances thereto ("Subject Property") in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter stated. 1. Exercise. This Option may be exercised� by deposit in the mails of written notice to Grantor _ 26�RT y/jl/1 c/SerX , cos- /5 Jaj.eriI zfueio 5-2eer /`fie AJ G%5/41N67D/J � 1 within 180 days from the date of this Option is accepted by Grantee and if not exercised by that time, this Option shall lapse unless extended as provided in Paragraph -2. 2. Extensions. This Option may be extended for three (3) periods of sixty (60) days each- by mailing written notice together with a check in the amount of ********TWO HUNDRED FIFTY & 00/100******** DOLLARS ($250.00 ) . for each extension to Grantor 'at the above address prior to the expiration of the original period or extension period then in effect and a copy to , Mr. Robert E. McBeth, ca04 B South Third Street, Renton, Washington 98055. 3. License for Entry. Grantor understands that, if Grantee exercises } the Option, it may be for the purpose of constructing retail facilities on Subject Property, and Grantee is hereby granted a license to enter upon Subject Property for all purposes reasonably related to a full and adequate determina- tion of the suitability of Subject Property for such purposes, including, but without limitation, the right to conduct surveys, soils tests and engineering studies. L/P 376 KYLE 4/29/76 4. Purchase Price. The purchase price._is the sum of *************"*'A*SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND $ 00/100*****DOLLARS ($ 75,000.00 ) . The amount paid as consideration for this Option, including extensions, shall be applied toward the entire purchase price. 5. Payment. The purchase price shall be paid as follows : .$18,750.00 shall be paid in cash at closing. The balance of . $56,250.00 shall be evidenced by purchaser's promissory note bearing interest at the rate of 8% per annum on declining principal balances and payable in equal monthly installments of $ 470.00 commencing on the first day of the month immediately following closing. and continuing on the first day of each and every month thereafter until paid in full. Grantee may not prepay in excess of twenty-nine percent (29%) of the principal of the note in any one year during the first three (3) years of the term of the note. Thereafter, the note may be prepaid in part or in full from time to time without penalty. 6. Security. Payment of the promissory note described above shall be ', secured by a mortgage of the Subject Property in statutory form. Grantor agrees to subordinate his interest in the mortgage on the Subject Property to another mortgage(s) or deed(s) of trust placed on the property by purchasers for the purpose of borrowing funds which are used to improve the property, including, but not limited to a construction loan, interim loan, permanent loan or refi- I�{ nanced permanent loan. In that connection, Grantor agrees to sign a subordin- 1 ation agreement in the form attached to this Option. Any such subordination shall be only to first mortgage(s) as required by Grantee from time to time, and Grantor shall not be required to subordinate to any secondary financing that Grantee may secure. The only condition of subordination shall be that rental income to be received from proposed tenants from the building improve- ments, after proper reserves for taxes and assessmentsIto be located on the property (or from a non-improved land lease) shall be sufficient to make the monthly payment to such mortgage(s) placed on the property by purchasers and the monthly payment required by Grantor's mortgage in accordance with Paragraph 5 hereof. L/P 376 KYLE 4/29/76 -2- 7. Easements. Upon closing Grantor agrees to execute easements for ingress and egress and vehicular and pedestrian traffic across the property in favor of the parcels of property abutting the Subject Property on its easterly and northerly boundaries in exchange for similar easements across said abutting parcels of real estate. In the event the mortgage described above is foreclosed, then: (a) if the improvements contemplated by Grantee as described in paragraph 14 below have been constructed on Subject Property, maintenance and use of the easements across the Subject Property will be conditioned upon payment to the owner of the Subject Property the sum of $100.00 per year in advance; or (b) if the improvements on Subject Property contemplated by Grantee as described in paragraph 14 below have not been constructed on Subject Property, the easements on Subject Property shall be deeded back to the 9wner of the Subject Property. 8. Conditions . Notwithstanding the exercise of this Option, Grantee need not purchase Subject Property unless each of the following conditions have been met or waived in writing by Grantee, and Grantor agrees to cooperate with Grantee and to execute any documents which may be necessary or convenient to the performance of these conditions: (a) Subject Property is zoned and the appropriate public authorities are committed by planned development approvals, plat acceptances, demolition, building and use permits, architectural approvals, environmental reports and permits, and any other required studies, reports or approvals, or written agree- ments satisfactory to Grantee, all of which have been finally adopted, to permit the construction and operation of .retail facilities and parking on Subject Property, including supermarkets, drug and variety stores, or combinations thereof, and other similar retail uses, without conditions thereto which in Grantee's reasonable opinion would cause construction and operation to be un- economical. All of the above shall not be deemed to be finally adopted until the last time period within which to contest each such matter by administrative or judicial proceedings, referendums, petitions for rehearing or otherwise has expired. The cost of obtaining zoning changes, including feasibility studies, environmental reports and permits, and attorneys ' fees, shall be borne by Grantee. If any governmental action is taken to affect the status quo of legally permitted uses, the Grantor, at Grantor's expense, shall use his best efforts to have the status quo maintained or restored. L/P 376 _3_ KYLE 4/29/76 (b) Grantee has been able to obtain a survey by a licensed surveyor, which shall show that (i) Subject Property conforms to the description herein (it is agreed that the legal description prepared by the surveyor shall be the description used in the deed conveying Subject Property to Grantee) , (ii) Subject Property extends to all adjacent streets, alleys and sidewalks, (iii) utilities are available to the boundaries of Subject Property adequate to serve Grantee's proposed use, and (iv) if more than one parcel is required to obtain the property desired for Grantee's proposed use, that all the parcels together would form one parcel, and each parcel forming the larger parcel would share its interior boundary lines with the other parcel or parcels. (c) Title to Subject Property shall be free and clear of all encumbrances, easements, assessments, restrictions, tenancies and other exceptions to title except the lien of taxes not yet due and payable and those exceptions which are approved in writing by Grantee. Grantor hereby covenants to advise Grantee of and give Grantee copies of any unrecorded leases. (d) The Escrow Holder shall be prepared to obtain, upon closing, an owner's policy of title insurance, or at Grantee's option a title insurance binder, in the full amount of the purchase price, insuring fee simple title to Subject Property to be vested in Grantee or Grantor's nominee, subject only to the exceptions permitted by Paragraph 8 immediately above. , . 7c) (e) Grantee's surveys, soil tests and engineering studies, in Grantee's sole opinion, shall show Subject Property to be suitable for Grantee's proposed use, including but not by way of limitation, a determination by Grantee that vehicular access, utility availability, and the physical condition of the property are such that Grantee's proposed retail facilities could be constructed and operated without incurring any extraordinary costs. (f) The means of vehicular access into Subject Property, as controlled by medians, curb cuts, signal lights, traffic directional signs and other traffic controls, shall be satisfactory to Grantee. L/P 376 KYLE 4/29/76 -4- (g) The Subject Property is one of several properties which must be acquired in order to obtain a sufficiently large parcel for Grantee's proposed use, and the properties required are shown as Parcel B and C on Exhibit "A". In the event any one of these parcels cannot be acquired prior to, or simultaneously with, the closing, Grantee may terminate this agreement by ten (10) days' written notice to Grantor, even though the Option has been exercised. If, however, Parcels B and C are not acquired by Grantee in the manner and under the terms and conditions of this paragraph 8(g) , then Grantor shall be immediately released from this Option. Grantee will use best efforts to acquire the right to purchase Parcels B and C at a price which in Grantee's sole and absolute discretion is compatible with Grantee's proposed use. Such acquisition may be subject to all conditions of Paragraph 8, as well as others reasonably related to insuring that the entire parcel be suitable for Grantee's intended use, and Grantee shall be deemed to have acquired Parcels B and C only when deeds conveying the same to Grantee have been delivered to Grantee. 9. Escrow Holder. After notice of exercise of Option. is given and prior to closing an escrow shall be opened with a recognized leading escrow company in King County, State of Washington of Grantee's choice ("Escrow Holder") . Grantor shall deposit therein a duly executed and acknowledged Warranty Deed conveying Subject Property to Grantee or Grantee's nominee, or portions to Grantee's nominees, together with instructions to deliver and record the deed when the Escrow Holder is in a position to pay the down payment to Grantor and have Grantee execute the promissory note and second mortgage. After all of the conditions of closing as set forth in Paragraph 8 have been met and Grantee has been so advised, Grantee shall--deposit in escrow the down-payment with in- structions to disburse the same to Grantor upon recording of Grantor's deed and issuance of the title insurance policy or binder required by Paragraph 8(d) . 10. Closing. Closing shall be the date on which the deed to Grantee is recorded which shall be as soon as practicable after deposit of the down payment and executed promissory note into escrow. .Possession passes to Grantee on closing ott. glf(Tv e6.0) ,QAS>s =®t.,c,C)WeA - . twine%se Qr= J L/P 376 ev, A. ` KYLE 4/29/76 5 EXHIBIT NO. g gr1- ITEM NO. 7 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JUN2 81977 AM PM 718i9r10,11i12i 112a314,5.6 A . - . .. -. .,. . ... - . ......r; •.' , . ,". 4VI, .ior . . .- ... • _ , ..., -.Is "c:• . .... i - • - 44L r - ....fly...0-- ...,or r .---• ,- ' ,-. ' `du r,„ A . .• 0 I 6 611" 44,-4' • .. Z.:1-,..• -IV . ... . � ♦ 3y .. ✓`. .1r • f '3 +��Y ., * ?,,. . 1 +.. 1 e ' -4. ,.7 � w + . i ' 3 l 14 , 4 t • +1( , 1141' " :4 t + , is !Apt R, ~, !• • ,.. .. i,, 'rt Irv• ; I. ♦ VI.** . �� r� ` 4‘. -6 i �, i 1, I. ., V > f ii. 111'Z 4 . . '!i Cott . i 1s i F f d v lc 4. s . sr i tt . , t r ' 4 \ vv c , < < z 4 it 41, iS • a.-• -"'"- ' mil, �" •C, �' ' . • iT' � � K `� . . ' I nt ••4. . •..'• , gig*, • I, t , i 1, 11 Fi'' ' P•It •, ', t k ' . • I , . •,...M. Ai& , \ * .. ) 4 `t it•-•-lir ii1, • 111,• / '.011V ' - 1. . f,,j; • • . .. AP' . ; i •'/ -4 k . . 0, .. .- , ., . , ,( 4 '• . • ilk, ir '1, I r ... h • .1 . , , 1 • , II 4. I 4 ; i • :.• i 411...tit 'r, 4‘ - • .r \ : It%;• k . . . 1 • t . " •- 0 . - f. • .* * * • .. , . . g, , J•. N, -. . . ' ' 400 4, .. ..:. Ala•••• • •• - tlEr"...''' '••• 1.4•i'. 1 1 - • * 1 t . . . . k , .-. , ... . ,i. , . 4 ••• •-... '',' • . P., If • Ar ilir r • $. .- . . . . ,..... - . ., ., -. , ,.. • II', , wa . . . • 14 41 ' ',•• •, egt 14 k Am* At W51 r -. '1 . ,• " If I ,4, ••,. 1 44- r '. •• '..t .41 * • s 101irr' •• • 17141' ' . • ,\,, • . _ • ,L ,.;•• ',. e .., , .,.. I. . . .'•..:.:r..ty‘•,i.i;,.'..•..... •. 4.:1}-,•f•1•",:..'t r',-,..•'I,•„.1 t'‘s • I•.4,.1+ -l. I I ,11 11. Costs. Grantee shall pay the costs of recording the deed conveying Subject Property to Grantee. Any escrow fees shall be paid by Grantee. Taxes, rentals and utilities shall be prorated as of closing. Any assessments for improvements completed prior to the date hereof, whether levied or not, shall be paid by Grantor. All other costs including all other recording fees, any state documentary stamps, transfer taxes, excise taxes and all title insurance premiums shall be paid by Grantee. 12. Commissions. All brokerage commissions shall be paid by Grantee. 13. Warranty. Grantor represents and warrants that Grantor has authority to grant this Option and the license herein granted and that Grantor holds marketable title to Subject Property. In the event of breach of this Warranty, all sums paid hereunder shall be refunded to Grantee, and Grantor shall reimburse Grantee for all direct or indirect costs incurred by Grantee in reliance on this Option. 14. Use. Although Grantee is considering the construction of retail facilities on Subject Property, nothing herein contained shall be construed to limit the uses to which Grantee may put Subject Property, or to- require Grantee to develop Subject Property for retail use or at all, or imply that Grantee has any present intention of constructing retail facilities on Subject Property in the near future or at any time. 1S. Time. In the event all the conditions set forth in Paragraph 8 have not been met or waived within one (1) year after exercise of this Option, Grantee at any time thereafter, so long as the conditions have not been met or waived, may terminate this agreement without liability by written notice to Grantor. 16. Casualty. Should the improvements, if any, on Subject Property be destroyed or materially damaged by fire or other casualty prior to the time of closing, then Grantee, at Grantee's sole option, may elect to (a) ter- minate Grantee's obligation to purchase by giving written notice to Grantor at any time prior to the time of closing and receive back all sums paid here- under, or (b) complete the purchase of Subject Property with the purchase price being reduced by an amount equal to the loss of damage suffered by said improvements. L/P 376 -6- KYLE 4/29/76 • 17. Condemnation. Should any entity having the power of condemnation decide prior to the time of closing to acquire any portion of or any interest in Subject Property, Grantee at Grantee's sole option may elect to (a) terminate Grantee's obligation to purchase Subject Property by giving written notice to Grantor at any time prior to the time of closing and receive back all sums paid hereunder, or (b) complete the purchase of Subject Property with Grantor immediately.appointing Grantee its attorney-in-fact with Grantor and Grantee being mutually obligated to negotiate with said condemning entity. Grantor shall have first priority with respect to all sums awarded after deducting necessary expenses, in reduction of the then outstanding principal balance of aforementioned promissory note and second mortgage. 18. Successors. This Option shall be binding on the heirs, successors, assigns and personal representatives of the parties hereto. 19. Attorneys' Fees. If Grantor or Grantee files suit against the other which is in any way connected with this option, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party a reasonable sum for attorneys ' fees. 20. Notices. All notices to Grantor shall be sent to Grantor act- 4Lapy to Mr. Robert E. McBeth, 505 - B South Third Street, Renton, Washington 98055 and all notices to Grantee shall be sent to Grantee at 606 110th Avenue I!; N.E., Bellevue, Washington 98004 and a copy to Joseph D. Holmes, Jr. , Karr, _ _ _ __ . I Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer & Morrow, 2600 Seattle First National Bank Building, f Seattle, Washington 98154. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Option to be executed , i this /0 day of 4/0 , 1976. ! i Accepted by Grantee this /d;y day of _ /f/t , 1976. GRANTOR: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: T t /1 - 1; -4__ n, r:A r--"` ..... c, a ‘ ) 0( rk,,_ - , __,/ _ ,.J , ,,, . . • L/P 376 -7- KYLE 4/29/76 • STATE OF WASHING:TON ) ss. • COUNTY OF KING ) On this c ay personally appeared before me At, 6 L .. XYLC - and / 2y- X )0yC6 to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVING under my hand and official s l this /6 day of AV , 19 76, . , C ,.___R--- Notary Public in and for the State of W h' ton residing at _ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) - On this day personally appeared before me C. E. LOVELESS and LLOYD W. POWELL to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they 1 \ signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. - - Giving under my hand and official seal this 10th day of May, 1976. Y X ) -)L., Notary Public in and for the .State of Washington residing at Bellevue. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at . EXHIBIT "A" TO - KYLE PROPERTY � _ - SUBJECT PROPERTY • , All of Tract 9 of Joseph P . Marshall tracts less North 240 feet parallel to SR900 . PARCEL B - Lot 8 of Joseph P. Marshall Tracts, as pe r volume 38 plats , page 30 record of King County , in King County, Washington. PARCEL C - - _ Beginning at a point on the West line of said Tract9 and the South right-of-way line of SR900 as described in Decree of Appropriation entered in King County - Superior Case No. 742207, entitled State of Washington vs . James A. Taylor, et al; thence South 240 feet along the West line of said Tract; thence North- easterly 240 feet from and parallel to the South line of said SR900 to the East line of Tract 9; thence North along said East line to the South right-of-way line of said SR90.0; thence _ Southwesterly along said south right-of-way line to the point of beginning; - , - i Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. - : • • ";ii-N � , THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE:. • m. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company • WASHINGTON TITLE DIVISION - Filed for Record at Request of . - . Name . Address =• . . - - • City and State • . ' - - SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT TO AND OF LOWER PRIORITY THAN THE'LIEN OF SOME OTHER- OR LATER SECURITY ' INSTRUMENT. - • ` - - The undersigned subordinator and owner agree as follows: - 1 - referred to herein as-"subordinator," is the owner and holder of a mortgage dated . • , 19.- which is recorded in volume of Mortgages, page - under auditor's file No • , records of ` - - County. 9 - referred to herein as "lender," is the owner and holder of a mortgage dated , 19 , executed by - (which is recorded in volume of Mortgages, page ,under auditor's file No. ,records of County) (which is to be recorded concurrently herewith). -- - 3 - - . . .. referred to herein as "owner," is the owner of all'the real property described in the mortgage identified above in Paragraph 2. 4. In consideration of benefits to "subordinator" from "owner," receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and to induce "lender" to advance funds under its mortgage and all agreements in connection therewith, the "subordinator" does hereby unconditionally subordinate the lien of his mortgage identified in Paragraph 1 above to the lien of "lender's" mortgage, identified in Paragraph 2 above, and all advances or charges made or accruing thereunder, including any extension or renewal thereof. 5. "Subordinator"acknowledges that, prior to the execution hereof,he has had the opportunity to examine the terms of"lender's" mortgage, note and agreements relating thereto, consents to and approves same, and recognizes that "lender" has no obligation to -'subordinator" to advance any funds under its mortgage or see to the application of"lender's"mortgage funds, and any application or use of such funds for purposes other than those provided for in such mortgage, note or agreements shall not defeat the subordina- tion herein made in whole or in part. - - - - 6. It is understood by the parties hereto that "lender" would not make the loan secured by the mortgage in Paragraph 2 without this agreement. --. , 7. This agreement shall be the whole and only agreement between the parties hereto with regard to the subordination of the lien or charge of the mortgage first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the mortgage in favor of"lender" above referred to and shall supersede and cancel any prior agreements as to such, or any, subordination including, but not limited to, those provisions, if any, contained in the mortgage first above mentioned, which provide for the subordination of the lien or charge thereof to-a mortgage or mortgages to be thereafter executed. -. . •- •-. - - 8. The heirs, administrators, assigns and successors in interest of the"subordinator"shall be bound by this agreement. Where the -word "mortgage"--appears herein it shall also be considered as "deed of trust," and gender and number of pronouns considered to conform to undersigned. - - - - Executed this - • • 'day of , 19 . - NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION WHICH ALLOWS THE PERSON OBLI- GATED ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN A PORTION OF WHICH MAY BE EXPENDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES THAN IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND. _ , Owner .' _ . - - Subordinator STATE OF WASHINGTON . 1 - STATE OF 'WASHINGTON ^ • • t ss. ss • .. COUNTY OF 1 COUNTY OF • On this day of , 19 On this day personally appeared before me before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Wash- ington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared and to me known to be the President and • to me known to be the individual described in and . Secretary respectively, of • who executed the within-foregoing instrument, and - ' - . - - - acknowledged that signed the same as the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,-and acknowledged free and voluntary act and deed, for the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act-and deed of said �-or- the uses and purposes therein mentioned. • poration, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal GIVEN under my hand and official seal this affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. day of - . ]g • Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, . Washington, residing at re•sidinb at .. .. . I I IS RECOMMENDED THAT, PRIOR TO_ THE EXECUTION OF THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT, THE PAR CIES UONSC'Lf \11•I-H THEIR ATTORNEYS WITH RESPECT THERETO. • 4 OF RSA v OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON o .�,I POST OFFICE BOX 626. 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 A CO 0 Q GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARRE N, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY -P47, FOSEPlt August 18 , 1977 MEMORANDUM TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney Re: Restrictive Covenants - Loveless/Powell Dear Del: We have just received the original of the enclosed Assignment • whereby Mr. Powells interest has been eliminated and C. E. Loveless et ux appear as the sole interested parties . That being the case, the signatures of Mr. and Mrs . Loveless only are required and you may therefore accept the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants on that basis . These Covenants undoubtedly should be dated August 18 , 1977 , which is the same date as the Assignment. The Ordinance can therefore be signed l published forthwith. Ge and .'S an GMS :nd ////1 ( / • J Loveless/Powell, inc. 606 - 110th Northeast, Suite 105, Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 455-0390 August 4, 1977 Ms. Del Mead, City Clerk Municipal Building 200 Mill Street Renton, Washington 98055 Re: SWC Sunset Ej Duvall Renton, Washington Dear Ms. Mead: We hand you herewith two copies of the fully signed Declaration of Re- strictive Covenants governing the proposed development at this location. We are also delivering a fully signed copy to Mr. Gordon Ericksen of the Planning Department. It is my understanding that you will arrange to have this document re- corded tomorrow, August 5, 1977. It will be appreciated if you will ad- vise the necessary departments and Council committees that the document has been signed and recorded. In particular, we have been advised that the Ways and Means Committee must be advised so that it can be moved from their Committee for the purpose of City Council action at the August 8, 1977, meeting. It is my understanding that if the ordinance is approved by the City Coun- cil at the August 8th meeting, that this will be the second and final read- ing of the ordinance, and that you will subsequently arrange for publication of the ordinance not later than August 12, 1977. You have advised that the ordinance becomes fully effective five (5) days after publication, which will be August 17, 1977. Please advise if any of these understandings are in conflict with fact. Thank you for your cooperation. Regards, GEC Dean W. Tibbott DWT:mlb Enclosures cc: Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director Developers, Contractors, Property Management i I((� i1 • INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM i1 �'. TO : ;'1a{;:4_.:. DATE : i0 • FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE : Ordinances ant1.1=R'e=s` kams' i ?o;le is We attach Resolution (s) and/or Ordinances (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee . Ig • INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM 19 TO : a!,` _ ^ y . 1?,!r;tr .7 DATE : FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE : Ordinances a.nd- Resoa,u:tio,ns, II �Id We attach Resolution (s) and/or Ordinances (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of 1 the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee. IF Renton City Council 8/8/77 Page 4 Old Business - Continued Community Services Committee Member Stredicke presented Community Services Committee Committee Report Report announcing committee review of storm and surface water drain- ageStorm & Surface ordinance and recommended referral of the ordinance to the Ways and Means Committee for appropriate action and to be placed on the Water Drainage agenda for the Council meeting of 8/22/77 as a public meeting item. Ordinance MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR . CARRIED. Transfer of MOVED STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, REMOVE RESOLUTION FROM TABLE AND REFER Air Park TO WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. MOVED STREDICKE; SECOND PERRY, AUTH- ORIZE ADMINISTRATION TO TRANSFER AIRPORT AIR PARK PROPERTY TO PARK DEPT. FOR PARK PURPOSES AND PARK BOARD BE EXTENDED COURTESY OF USE OF STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CONTINUATION OF PARK PURPOSES IN THAT GENERAL AREA OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.. Councilman .Stredicke, explained 60% of the property belonged to Airport. MOTION CARRIED. (See Resolution h 2126) Nome Protection Councilwoman Shinpoch asked Police .Department to investigate placing from of advertising on doorknobs, which causes problem for residents away Advertisements from home on vacation. Mayor Delaurenti, noted vacation protection infor- mation had been enclosed in utility billing, suggesting neighbor- hood house watching. !Jays & Means Council Committee Chairman Clymer reported the Ways and Means Committee Committee Report recommended the Hearing Examiner include. map,with all rezones that are referred to Council . MOVED BY SHINPOCH.,,- SECOND PERRY, MAP BE INCLUDED Zoning, Plats, IN ALL MATERIALS COMING TO COUNCIL FROM'•THE: HEARING EXAMINER , INCLUDING Etc. MAP WHICH HAS BEEN FURNISHED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES The Ways and Means Committee Chairman submitted committee report First Reading recommending first reading of an ordinance providing for appropria- Trail and Park tion of funds in amount of $394,252 for the Cedar River Trail and Planning Cedar Center Park planning. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, THE ORDINANCE BE PLACED ON FIRST READING. CARRIED. Following reading , it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER,_ COUNCIL REFER THE .ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Ordinance #3150 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final Alley Vacation reading of an ordinance providing for the vacation of a portion of Waldenburger Alley, Block 12, Plat of Car Works Addition located between Factory Ave. N. and N. 3rd P1 . First reading. of ordinance 8/1/77. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL; ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3151 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final . Appropriation readings of an ordinance providing for appropriation of funds from :,enplane Base unanticipated revenue for the Airport Account in the sum of $60,000. Municipal Airport Following reading of ordinance, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. (First reading 8/1/77) ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3152 The Committee report recommended second and final-readings- of an Loveless-Powell ordinance rezoning property from G to B-i and R-2, known as the Rezone Loveless Powell rezone, first reading 8/1/77, located SW corner of NE Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. NE. Following discussion, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL REQUEST THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO WITHHOLD SIGNING AND PUBLICATION UNTIL PROPER, EXECUTED RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS ARE RECEIVED AND RECORDED. CARRIED.. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Stredicke noted for record, his re- luctance in voting Aye, and did so only because of absence of other Council members. Resolution #2126 The Committee report recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Fund Transfer transferring funds from the Airport unto Park account in amount of Air Park $10,000 to facilitate administrative management of the Air Park. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL_ ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Renton City Council 8/1/77 - Page 4 - Ordinances & Resolutions (Continued) Ordinance Changing The Ways & Means Committee report recommended first reading of an Zoning from (G) to , ordinance changing the zoning classification of certain properties (B-1 ) and (R-2) - within the City of Renton from General Classification District (G) Loveless-Powell to Business District (B-1 ) and Residence District (R-2) , property 1st Reading located on the southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Blvd. and Duvall Ave. N. E. (Loveless-Powell ) . After reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, TO REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE UNTIL THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance Appro- The Ways & Means Committee report recommended first reading of an priating Funds ordinance appropriating and transferring $60,000 from Unanticipated Seaplane Base Revenue unto Airport account for the purpose of providing seaplane Improvements base improvements at Renton Municipal Airport. After reading, it 1st Reading was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TO REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. MOTION CARRIED. Resolution Trans- The Ways & Means Committee report recommended reading of a resolution ferring Funds transferring $10,000 from Airport to Park for the purpose of facili- Airport to Park tating the administrative management of the Air Park development. Moved by Clymer, seconded by Bruce to adopt the resolution as read. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL REQUEST THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT AND THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, TO DETERMINE REAL PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND EXACT LOCATION AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL NEXT WEEK AND TABLE THE RESOLUTION FOR ONE WEEK. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke said he was concerned with spending Airport money on this park, assuming that part of the park is on the Airport and that we are not in conflict with Forward Thrust. Political Signs Councilman Perry remarked that he had noticed an old political sign on Public Right-of- on the public right-of-way for a candidate for Mayor of Seattle and Way noted that candidates for the up-coming elections should be informed that political signs should be on private property, not on public right-of-ways and should be removed within two weeks after the elec- tion. Mayor Delaurenti reported the Building Division had already informed all the candidates. Adjournment MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Council meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. e7 >7?-/-&-e' Maxine E. Motor, Deputy City Clerk jt Renton City Council 8/1/77 - Page 3 - Correspondence & Current Business (Cont'd. ) Glencoe Park REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE.* Mayor Delaurenti Phase I asked for audience comment. Dennis Skinner, 4419 N.E. 24th, said the Audience Comment area not have a community club to coordinate any kind of fund raising, also did not consider a fence west side only was adequate. Mayor Delaurenti responded that the city hoped to fence the whole park next year and the fence on the west side was because of impact on the neigh- boring lot, Councilwoman Thorpe commented that contributions of money and materials were not part of the agreement with the residents, possi- bly they would help with landscaping later. Karen Holbrook, 4406 N.E. 24th St. , said s,he was the owner of the property to the west and also concerned with the fence being only on the west side and the residents wanted to see the plans so they know what is actually going into the park. Councilwoman Thorpe showed the residents the plans for the park drawn up by the city' s landscape architect and said it was designed to be a "tot lot" . Upon inquiry by Councilwoman Thorpe, Planning Direc- tor Ericksen replied the plans included planting of grass and a sprink- ler system. Mayor Delaurenti told the residents a meeting would be called shortly and they would be notified. *MOTION CARRIED. Renton Merchants Letter from Renton Merchants Association expressed gratitude to Association Mayor Delaurenti for his efforts in improving the Downtown Shopping Letter of Area of Renton, particularly his most recent project of surfacing Appreciation the parking lot on S. Burnett St. OLD BUSINESS Upon inquiry by Councilwoman Shinpoch as to the responsibility Banners in Downtown of removing banners on the Arts and Crafts Festival in the down- Area town area, Mayor Delaurenti said the committee had been contacted to remove them. Public Services Public Services Committee Chairman Bruce submitted report recommend- Committee Report ing the City Park Fund purchase Glencoe Park from the Utility Fund Glencoe Park Site at the fair market value of $10,000; payment to be made at the Purchase rate of $66.00 or more per month for a 20-year period at 5% interest. MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, THAT THE CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF THE PURCHASE OF THE GLENCOE PARK SITE BE: (1 ) THAT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BE DESIGNATED FOR PARK PURPOSES, (2) THAT THE PROPERTY NOT BE SOLD, TRADED, OR OTHERWISE DISPOSED OF WITHOUT CON- SENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL, (3) THAT PAYMENTS BEGIN AFTER COMPLETION OF PHASE I , PLUS SANDBOX, PLAY EQUIPMENT, LAWN AND SPRINKLER SYSTEM, (4) THAT THE ADMINISTRATION MEET WITH GLENCOE RESIDENTS, ON A REGULAR BASIS, IN ORDER TO INSURE THEIR PARTICIPATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PARK IN A TIMELY MANNER. MOTION CARRIED. Connection to Sewer The committee report recommended the City Council concur in Mr. Union Ave. N.E. Hank' s request for connection to the City sewer main on Union Ave. Paul Hanks N.E. subject to the following conditions: (1 ) That he agree to sign a petition and promote annexation of his property to the City in conjunction with any petition for annexation circulated in the area including his property; (2) That he agree to and conform with all City of Renton regulations pertaining to his proposed development. Discussion followed regarding having agreement in writing from the applicant to these conditions. MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY PERRY, THE MATTER BE TABLED FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Committee of the Council President Perry announced that the City's Financial Consul- Whole Meeting tant would be at the Committee of the Whole meeting on 8/4 to give 8/4/77 the Council information on interest rates for bonds to fund the Senior Citizens Center and inquired if there was other information the Council Members would require at the meeting. Councilman Clymer said the Council should have the figures on how many voted in the last General Election and how many votes are needed to validate a bond issue; the City Clerk responding the figures would be furnished. Councilwoman Thorpe requested the Finance Director be present. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance Vacating Ways & Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report recommend- Portion of Alley ing first reading of an ordinance vacating a portion of a certain Block 12, Car Works alley within Block 12, Plat of Car Works Addition, in the vicinity Addition - Martha of Factory Ave. N. and N. 3rd Place. After reading, it was MOVED Waldenburger BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, THE ORDINANCE BE REFERRED BACK 1st Reading TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. MOTION CARRIED. i / t.LI'f c_oc-n 9 = aL) • U INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM - �V • ING TO : Planning Department DATE : 8-1-77 FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE : Ordinances aw&XMT,TOcluctqcaMSK Loveless & Powell Rezone • We attach Resolution (s) and/or Ordinances (s) which have been prepared by the City Attorney. Please verify content , legals , description and general location of the improvements and return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee . JJJ�� I J .Q�'�;,1, /1 /�Z L�r�✓CGt- � /1 •� f7�s.^ - 3^t/ / I Lf c 4 --n _ a t NTEROFF I CGE M M0 TO: Del Mead, City Clerk DATE: July 28 , 1977 FROM: Lawrence J. WArren, Asst. City Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance re Loveless 8 Powell Rezone Dear Del: Enclosed herewith is the original of a proposed Ordinance re the above Rezone. Please verify the legal description and insert the date and recording number of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants . Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd Encl. 4:(" RENTo cw, f ,. 9,„ - U 0 A. )31` F- z eiN/NG CITY OF RE'V'1'ON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF .REN',T'ON, .WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION:OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON' FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) AND RESIDENCE DISTRICT ' (R-2) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been .'zoned as General Classifiation District, (G) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification'. of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about March 7, 1977 which petition''.was' ,duly referred to •the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been •held thereon' on or about June 283 1977, and said matter having been duly' considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in.,conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the. City Council having duly considered all, matters relevant thereto, and all parties . having been heard appearing in support thereof or in ,opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) and Residence District (R-2) as hereinbelow specified; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-.wit: -1-, _Y:m • r • . '!, 'y a ,r- ,1".i'•.i ;1' 'a�Y:',.°++ • ,7 + .r.t- .f.3.i't is.}._ ;,,qt• 1'y; 'i a,y1 '-1-.3' '... ,• ' ' , T,.i r' _.;r 7� ',Y1 :r. art t i. a . :t ,'?s!6,:i ,_'', .y'.i:' •I_- -. r'•' 1..." L'�•' .• ',;1:..a \.i; a F-': r:V :.- .'.P :F' ''tltA1 . 'l r11w.. 1•.. 'A ,ti 7• ,:4 C - i .S, • -. , - a._. _ c') t: •'k'y--t?.1....';,e' '. �; r .ri•, .{" - • a • • • ' 1A r'` •:;P .17u 4:r • AI• • • • • • '.41.-" 1.. _`' ',`s:2. ''; Tf• r.4:t'•; a, 7_ . . . . i. 's i ' ,,. ''}'a•.Aj Jil(i rb,~' S r( : t✓n cl. • 'r Fl..4�,',., ',r� w• cd 1 i.7 .1. •.- .', }., ,ie. "••. • ,1r'r.J a.V _I"•+i r'.Y,' - 'g•' ell. .r'• , - '' _ r.D' .F• "-�,, :Via. 'e..'•T• - ;fvfi'-F4:h +" •{. I _ '`'r' •s3 Y7. t_ .6.,.. ::.`. :A'.if.:f;1'A : 1/ 1"�,r,....', f,,µr:4, ',.'i,, r'•.,..',r ' .. il,'r ,_. !'I:.:•gtia .',..'"„a,f.:--. ,'} • .aT: 1°I -••a'..•i✓X: 'S.i ,:... 'T.')': 1'€B'. 1 i. 0,' A� -'��. +'7!¢�'i r .; �.�,,: a .,i, a+—, st .✓r•�. .- '—' •�:i,[ �1�.:lI Gi''tir , . , ., ',..••• T1 •U(a3, a ,, ,.: p • J' a , , •r�q'?' '1', 77. i�'. ..1,i s 1.P i ' '7:; '..7 I X' " . • . „„- _ s'•a,,� . }.,-'.. .;r,e•'.' ;.! •i'.. 'd°1 �•. s . 1 J":,-•.•tW. `;•1,.. • .� ',c-. •i f A I.'P-r• i . _ s r :x'.v, '-!. ter" '-p(4 44 trit.IN, .l.r'.7 f.a`W'1.••Y+ J'_'v 4"d .74,:'•Y�Ff•4 •X,.1 . .'';',. C;ri- ,,_1.' �',.J , ., r ,�,?'f< r'(,i1 s',. ;vi4''D"r~,'Fio ''ta r • •`.• '- r .,... . .• 'A.,. 5 i..,.. may,,/�'i.: tt- ,: tc _ ...' .t17{_.i>1.s3':. r',x , i 2.G._`k.3. .i .{� ° .;'v-,f- -f �.. -a 3i!S.'L}._• y. ..• . .p'S 1:T, `7.f jf.f. ;=. • .s" ',J •,.,('.tr'+,7.'Z. ifti - s .. • u :,.. • {.� J. ., a, , ;.,_k: 1t do Via_.: : .'. ` - Y - , .j,•^Jt 5,1.,' ,.1.•..�t . • • TO 'BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) I Tracts NO.'-:8, 'and 9, Joseph' P. Marshall Tracts •. , • according to the plat thereof .recorded .in Volume 38 of Plats, cage 30 ,:.records of 'King' County, • Washing ion; LESS;the. South`:1:3 0 -feet•-:.t1ier.eof; ,and: ::' • EXCEPT those portions dedicated for road ,purposes. • TO RESIDENCE; DISTRICT • (R-2) ,: • The .South 130 feet.; of ,Tra-cts.=No , 8'.and .9, . :Joseph .; •: P`. Marshall Tracts according to. :the.•'plat-. thereof. ' • • 'recorded in Volume' '38. of Plats', page. 30, records • • of King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions dedicated for road":purposes. • : • ‘C,Said property •located ,Southwest'corner :Of N.E., ', Sunset Boulevard ,and Duvall AVe.'• N.E: , Renton, ' King County, Washington)' _, • •• . SUBJECT,- HOWEVER,,,'"to that certain Declaration 'of J .. Restrictive' Covenants' dated' ,' 1977,,: which is incorporated • herein and; made a.part .hereof ,as if full =.set forth, ''and which y, • Declaration, is recorded• in• the office•'of•'Director, of Records and': , Elections, King County No • ` SECTION .'II::' This- Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five (5) days.'•a'fter, its publication. • PASSED'- BY THE 'CITY' .COUNCIL;_this' ` day of 'August, 19,77, • • • Delores. A. Mead, ;City Clerk " • APPROVED .BY THE MAYOR, .this; day- of: August, 1977. ': Charles J 'Delaurenti, Mayor : Approved as to form: • • - Lawrence: J. Warren, Asst., City Attorney • Date of :Publication: , yff:'l.C'r'7 Y1:.c a q r',+". _,.tS,a.1.1'; ., w, :-.1-4 i1 t,.5: kll`til.,'•CS ] . 's':.Yi'.._,•i..l+eLL,t$J :,r, :.:q. }S7 r.i,''.�?'•; ✓K• ?T~�,. ' rl'-7-)' fy .irtre •.T"';. , "A ` • _ 3 . , • . :L-• - ..-M��•. X s �! , ;�1\{..q.�w.0 r•'-•r"+O�'. •Y wi.-.......e.w. . ' 'iiii:::2k1 ':i' 4ef 11 1' .( i �:,:g,,4'.',.t.r- ;,pi-i) - - c-:. 7:•:ir?:i t4.. `iy)•.t . . •i "Li- 784.e Y.:i 'v✓:,1.11 :: 1 '�J?1 'r�'P dq,✓ ,"tl-rf ±q, 's Rr. '",j..!. � 4�i.:+',1 r.r.., _ 1 ,.-1,C: 4'1 - Ia"a �:4:•-"•?: :CY i.q •,`f"'tile t� . r�' .,� c: . ra' • als;.4 .•4,• ,. .*. :.),i CJ ..r ? - :: '. s.;..,""..c..7i.'0.15 1- . :xi .c,-..,:: , 7 .t ;— .;,;;,=C0 ,a't, `"I.'4 •4.11 .," .. , :�,k:{.::--- r',:.-Y, ' • ''ii .7 71.: '1 jl:'. ,rE'; s_ T_ ?. .7 ...1 ': f. 'r rt :'"'. -. s '1-lit pi',*. ''_t'pi:,..°I,+r' is1 .;;r R/, r 2' Cka?'' l':r 'c` :4'. r'S S.'.'•c: ,T:3.1,,1 1-. 444 �c�..1: r R. T�..�t.✓ + c; .. • " 1 . - .R 1,1 f.,a ` .."f ,.t..,t:. ,.'pl' l_i.414.,.- Ld IP lr. .V r '.i, " 1 T y:i.a Ris..r,!lii .,.'',S, �a j _ ,. .,•�' ,,,,.✓ r......j -:.,,'. •:5.•',j Y}• = A'wr r l., y ..'.u'F•'.. , yy f, ,3—,r � :a,.-!:l.'a: ',',.._..'=r ,Lr•r•+.':y:a'f 4 it,.;1 i fr 1,1.y ' 4 P •1, '�+,4. •1..._ .i),r,-1. .f,'•r , ,,. -la•,d.• c 1;4' '.. yt :,.tt3%:' `" ' •s '1';6P' . 1 1r •' (Jr Ct : � . ,.rr''�:. - .,:i 41.1._`YY w FA4'::11'i(Sp .'tk kr. ', 7)"''' j• i4�•, 31 .. . � 'J .'t= i- :I'../5.�,"�t:J�i. •,�:y'^s(,:F�.� 't f*}� "''S. ':4•. .i i 1 ''.:•J.�i .F;i' � a - .I ._ : . 1 E' • n'�' 4Js :r' new '. .y 1 _ •y. ' .. - �'-I d 'PJ�,...'f'. f:'!r.7.r.F.;7 f ti_,r-` '�' l '7+.{"( i,r .r.:.-'ra,..i r• - - • ' ..fit : t't ,'r'� • VY43 -4/u, irc..t l'. 3 ''9;.' ewru : <Z �•.rn'"•.Q' , , , • .i . C%., . r' i ,. •t`rf, 't" :rI , 1Pr�r ;.J.j.,' U4- �++::t,r;,.'.P.-•,, �.} • 'x,. - . 'c �''y'`•-(�'Y,e,''�c"' 'd',tv.+`'. J: •b'r.'•'i: iv3 6A. iiM-�, .i.`�:rr,.. ' • r RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting July 25 , 1977 Municipal Building Monday , 8: 00 P . M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the regular meeting of the Renton City Council to Order. ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President Pro tem; KENNETH D. BRUCE, BARBARA Y. COUNCIL SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. STREDICKE AND PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL EXCUSE COUNCILMAN PERRY'S ABSENCE DUE TO VACATION. CARRIED. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES OF JULY 18, 1977 AS WRITTEN. Councilman Stredicke noted visiting Boy Scout David Lee had received 23 of 24 merit badges required to become Eagle Scout. MOTION CARRIED. SPECIAL AWARD Mayor Delaurenti awarded former Councilman William J. Grant with a special award plaque for outstanding service to the community as City Councilman from 1/1/68 to 7/15/77 and as Council President during 1971 . CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, Asst. City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; TED BENNETT, Deputy Public Works Director; HUGH DARBY, Police Chief; GARY KRUGER, Planning Department Representative; RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; DEL MEAD, City Clerk. PRESS DON CREW, Renton Record Chronicle PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, Annexation posted and mailed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to con- 75% Petition sider the J and F Investment Annexation of property ,to the eastern por- J&F Investment Co. tion of the City (19.4 acres) contiguous to newly annexed Heather Downs. (Robert Ferguson area, in the vicinity of Union Ave. S.E. and S.E. 2nd Place, former & Nicholas Janssen)S.E. 136th Street. Letter from City Clerk Mead recalled the 75% petition was filed with the City Council on 7/11/77 at which time hearing date was set; that petition certified valid by the City Planning Department as containing signatures representing .100% of ownership. The letter further recalled the preliminary meeting on 6/27/77 at which time the Council authorized circulation of the petition and owners agreed to accept the City's Comprehensive Plan; proposed zoning and any pre-existing bonded,indebtedness of the city. The letter noted Council ' s responsibility to determine whether to accept annexation and if accepted, authorize Planning Department to file Notice of Intention with the King County Boundary Review Board for further procedure as required by law. Upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke as to Comprehen- sive Plan for the area, Planning Rep. Kruger reported 'single family and some greenbelt area. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ACCEPT ANNEXATION REQUEST AND AUTHORIZE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO FILE NOTICE OF INTENTION WITH KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following Consent Agenda items, previously distributed to all Council Members are considered routine and are enacted by one motion unless removed by Council action for separate consideration. Marine Law Letter from King County Dept. of Public Safety, J.A. Zimmerman, Legal Enforcement for Adviser, gave notice of increase in charges for rendition of marine 1978 ' law enforcement services by approximately 10% to $1 ,830 commencing 1/1/78; new contract or addendum to be furnished prior to that date. Refer to Police Chief, Finance Director and Council 's Budget Committee. Voucher Ways and Means Committee report recommended approval for payment of Approval Vouchers No. 14567 through No. 14749 in the amount of $497,772.01 , hav- ing received departmental certification as to receipt of merchandise and/or services. Vouchers No. 14560 through No. 14566 were machine voided. Council concurrence recommended. Street Vacation Letter from City Clerk Mead reported petition has been filed for vacation SW Harris Place of a portion of SW Harris Place street right-of-way leaving 23 ft. width; located between Hardie Ave. SW and Rainier Ave. S. The letter reported filing fee of $100 received; that petition filed by Shenandoah Greystone Corp. , Inc. Letter recommended referral to Public Works Dept. for validation of petition and Board of Public Works and Public Services Committee regarding retention of easements and appraisal . Renton City Council 7/25/77 Page 2 • Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE .CONSENT AGENDA. Approved CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BE REMOVED -FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION. CARRIED. Bid Opening .City Clerk reported 7/20/77 bid opening for SW 43rd - S. 180th Indus- SW 43rd/S 180th trial Access Road, Joint Project with City of Kent;- four bids received Joint Project shown on attached tabulation. . Letter from Public Works Director • w/City of Kent Gonnason recommended Council acceptance of low bid submitted by Scar- , sells Bros. , Inc. in amount of $421 ,283.08, noting concurrence by the consulting engineers. The letter also recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute contracts subject to restrictions: The award of this contract.must be ratified by the Kent. City Council and the EDA Project Engineer as federal funds involved in this joint project. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND ACCEPT LOW BID. CARRIED. Loveless/Powell Letter from L.Rick Beele.r, . Hearing Examiner, submitted file for rezone Rezone R-889-76 Loveless/Powell , Inc. , appeal period having expi.red . 7/25/77 requesting submittal to Council 7/25/77 for review prior to adoption of ordinance. Request for rezone of southwest corner of NE Sunset Blvd and Duvall Ave. NE, from G to B-1 for 9.2 'acre commercial site and from G to R-2 for 1 ..8 acres for multiple family residential development. The Hear- ing Examiner and Planning Department recommended approval subject to conditions/restrictive covenants. .. Upon inquiries..by Council members , it was moved by Bruce, Second Clymer, Council table the matter for one week :for presentation. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, REZONE MATTER BE TABLES FOR 15.-MINUTES. CARRIED. Time 8: 12 p.m. Discussion ensued regarding procedure and Hearing Examiner Ordinance. Councilman Stredicke noted for the record that Council President Perry intended to, list names of Council members with Hearing Examiner' s Office in order that reports are, received at the -time of decision rather than at the end of. the appeal period.. Planning Representative Kruger, having obtained the_records , displayed map and explained area. Applicant Representative Dean, :T.ibbott, 17003. NE 28th' Pl . , Bellevue, explained perimeter roads would be dedicated public' roads (having been questioned, by Councilman Stredicke) , west boundary Anacortes Ave. NE, proposing additional dedication .of property for roadway to south. Upon; further inquiry by: Coun.ci'lman Stredicke re distance of eastern boundary of complex to Sunset.' B.1v:d../Duvall NE intersection, Mr.. Tibbott explained 300 ft. MOVED . CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, .COUNCIL REFER THIS REZONE TO THE WAYS AND MEANS: -COMMITTEE FOR PROPER ORDINANCE. CARRIED. MOVED' BY STREDICKE, SECOND.: SH:LNPOCH, MATTER OF HEARING EXAMINER ORDINANCE AND PROCEDURE BE REFERRED,.TO,THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE MAP OR PLAN_.IN; P.RESENTATION MATERIAL COUNCIL RECEIVES. • CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT- BUSINESS Appreciation: Letter, of appreciation was recei"ved from Mrs . John B'owron 1309 Pierce for Mayor P1 . NE for well run City•:a;nd` effic'ient Highlands Fire Dept. for aid in serious heart condition, crediting life-saving action,. Interim Letter from Finance Director requested approval for low bidder for Financing interim financing on LID's 297 (Heather Downs , sewers) , #302 (Lind SW street improvements) and #306 (NE •7th & Sunset- NE, sewers) . The letter reported interest rate per annum- of 4.75% .and recommended acceptance of Peoples National Bank. MOVED BY: -CLYMER,. SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR . IN RECOMMENDATION, AND ACCEPT PEOPLES NATIONAL "BANK'OFFER. Upon inquiry by Councilman Bruce, Councilman Clymer explained seven specs mailed out and four bids received, being confirmed by Deputy Finance Director Bennett. MOTION CARRIED.. Airport Fund Letter' from Airport Director, Deal Bennett, requested appropriation of Appropriation $60,000 from unanticipated revenue into airport' account representing grant received from FAA for seaplane base improvements at the northwest corner of the Municipal Airport. ' The letter explained, the project; being :constructed by Tripp Construction Co. of Renton, is nearing com- pletion and funds to be utilized, recommending referral to the City Attorney for proper legislation. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR AND REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. • ,J,„ 04 6. � pF R�� o THE CITY OF RENTON U `$ e 7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 04TED SEP1�� July 25, 1977 Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Members , Renton City Council RE: File No. R-889-76 , Loveless/Powell, Inc. Dear Mayor and Council Members: The appeal period for the attached rezone request expired on July 25, 1977 and we are transmitting copies of the Examiner' s decision for your review prior to adoption of an ordinance. We request that you include the attached with your Council material for the Council meeting of July 25, 1977 . If you desire additional information regarding the subject application, please contact the office of the Hearing Examiner. Sioe ele L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner • LRB:mp Attachments • /�:;} i(A/-()l_ /�U LC�G✓✓j•7 7�Z�GY/G�?J ri��/ �i l�i'(�(/i vCG L ��C � oFR�-v t • 0 THE CITY OF RENTON V ®® ` 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 4 L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 #P4 'DSEP1 . July 25, 1977 4'�` ` �i DN\ • Mr. Dean Tibbott RE: File No. R- Loveless/Powell; Inc. 1; L") t 606-110th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 .-, Bellevue, Washington 98004 rya Dear Mr. Tibbott: 4? `/E70� This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's report Of July 11, 1977, has not been appealed within the 'time period set by ordinance, and therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sin -re L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner • LRB:mp cc: Planning Department liCity Clerk • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Russell Collins and his wife Iva M. Collins, Roy R. Kyle and his wife Alice L. Kyle, and Kohl Excavating, Inc., a Washington Corporation, are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington; and C. E. Loveless and his wife Joan E. Loveless, and Lloyd W. Powell and his wife Vashti N. Powell, are the purchasers of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: Lots 8 and 9 of the Joseph P. Marshall Tracts, as per plats recorded in volume 38 of Plats, page 30, Records of King County, Washington; except those portions dedicated for road purposes,; WHEREAS, the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property; NOW THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: PERMITTED USES Permitted uses, of the property described shall be limited to the uses allowed as follows: the south 130 feet of the described property shall be limited to multi-family uses allowed in the R-2 Residence District of Section 4-708, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, • City of Renton, King County, Washington. The remaining northern portion of the described property shall be limited to uses allowed in the B-1 Business District, Section 4-711, Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. DEVELOPMENT Development of the property shall be limited to a shopping center on the northern B-1 portion of the property containing the permitted uses of the B-1 Business District, and to multi-family residential development on the remaining south 130 feet of the property containing the multi-family uses of the R-2 Residence District, all of which development shall conform to the site plans, Exhibit No. 6, attached, dated April 21, 1977; and this conformance shall be determined by the Public Works and Planning Departments, City of Renton. LANDSCAPED AREAS Landscape plans shall be prepared in conformance with the aforementioned Exhibit No. 6, dated April 21, 1977, and applicable ordinances of the City of Renton, and this conformance shall be determined by the Planning Department, City of Renton; and the landscape plans shall include: -2- 1. Landscaping of the right-of-way of all streets adjacent to the above- described property that lie between the boundary lines of the above- described property and sidewalk and/or paving improvements in the right-of-way; and this landscaping shall be of the same general design, quality and quantity as that of the landscaping contained within the development within the above-described property. 2. As many of the existing trees shall be retained as possible. 3. Intensive landscaping within 25 feet sufficient, in the judgment of the Planning Department, City of Renton, to constitute an effective, visual barrier of at least six feet in height shall be installed along the north 25 feet of the south 130 feet of the above-described property. 4. Construction of an architectural-type fence of six-foot height shall be accomplished on the property line separating the B-1 and R-2 portions of the above-described property. 5. All landscaping and fencing are to be installed within 90 days after construction of the shopping center buildings in the B-1 portion of the above-described property. 6. Parking lot areas shall be landscaped according to Section 4-2204.8.B(3) , Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, City of Renton, King County, Washington. STORM DRAINAGE Storm drainage plans shall be approved by the Public Works Department, City of Renton, according to requirements of applicable ordinances and policies of the City of Renton; and clearing and grading of the above-described property shall not occur until full and complete approval is granted or issued by said Public Works Department; EXCEPT that existing fill material previously deposited on the site may be removed. INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Along the west boundary of the above-described property shall be constructed roadway paving of sufficient width to constitute a total roadway surface, together with the existing roadway surface, that will comply with applicable, established public street standards per requirements of the Public Works Department, City of Renton. The south twenty feet of the south 130 feet and the west ten feet of the above-described property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for the purpose of public access. Along the south boundary of the above-described property shall be constructed a roadway meeting applicable, established public street standards per requirements of the Public Works Department, City of Renton, and such roadway shall connect Duvall Avenue Northeast to the roadway created along the western boundary of the above-described property. Both said roadway improvements shall be dedicated to the City of Renton, free and clear of all encumbrances. -3- CONSTRUCTION HOURS Hours for construction activity outside of buildings shall be limited to the period between 7:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. on the weekdays of Monday through Saturday. SIGNING Signs shall be approved by the Sign Design Review Committee, City of Renton. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 1990, provided all of these covenants are fulfilled and completed per the City of Renton Planning and Public Works Departments' review and approval. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any other property owners adjoining described property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during said enforcement will be borne by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns. Russell Collins • • Iva M. Collins Roy R. Kyle Alice L. Kyle, formerly Alice L. Taylor Kohl Excavating, Inc. Kohl Excavating, Inc. • C. E. Loveless Joan E. Loveless Lloyd W. Powell Vashti N. Powell, as to the marital community composed of Lloyd W. Powell and Vashti N. Powell -4- STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this day of , 19 , before me personally appeared the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be their free and voluntary act and deed for ttie use and purposes therein mentioned. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at • 4OF41 U `f 0 t:;, saakb l� r, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ® RENTON,WASHINGTON one. !/^ .y MOST OFFICE BOX 828, 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 255.8576 �Q` GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WA RREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 4) 4T4.0 SEP1— July 16, 1977 • • . MEMORANDUM • *, "t TO: Rick Beeler, Hearing .Examiner ® JUL /977 `5' eI I� FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney s C/T ��4E19 r, Of ERffSRFNr pN RE: Loveless '- Powell. Rezone Covenants Opp ICk• `4 Dear Rick: • Thank you for your memo of July 15, 1977 regarding the above captioned matter. Up to now I have not yet received a copy of your final decision on this application but I have 'checked over the draft of• your "Declaration of Restrictive Covenants" for the Loveless-Powell Shopping Center premises.• My comments are as follows, at least on a preliminary basis : • a. It would appear that Loveless-Powell have not as yet acquired title to the subject property and they probably are only the purchasers or optionees . In any event, they should also be • required 'to .sign this declaration anitheir proper status identified. - This for the obvious reason that if for any reason the transaction between the owners listed and Loveless-Powell is not consummated, then this declaration probably would be meaningless . I am also wondering whether a effective period of close to 50 -years is reasonable under the circumstances . • b. Hopefully subparagraph 5 under "Landscaped Areas" can be made more certain by giving a time limitation in which landscaping and fencing are to be installed. A suggestion would be that it be • completed not later than 60 to 90 days after construction is completed . - c. Under "Installation of Off-Site Improvements", could the roadway be more definitely described, i. e. , exact width to avoid any possible argument later on. The last sentence of that section should provide that "Both said roadway improvements shall be dedicated to the City of Renton, free and clear of all encumbrances . " d. I have some doubt about the legality of limiting the construction hours unless we are talking about activities that produce a certain amount of noise or inconvenience to others. For instance if work is done inside the building which does not produce any appreciable noise, there is no reason why such work cannot be performed .,as far as the City is concerned. . Prevailing labor union regulations may provide otherwise but it would not be up to the City to prohibit somebody from working after hours, i. e. painters, plastererr,plumbers, etc. . e. Under "Signing" I would suggest that the applicable ordinances be identified by number. We agree with you that these covenants should be executed by all of the parties having an interest in this subject property and then same should be recorded with the County at the time the ordinance is adopted. The ordinance itself will then make reference to the "Declaration of Restrictive Covenants" . If we can be of any further assistance, please let us know. We remain Very truly yours, ' Gerard M. Shellan GMS:b j m INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date June 21 , 1977 TO: Mike Smith FROM: Warren C. Gonnason SUBJECT: Loveless/Powell Rezone We first assume that the LOVELESS/POWELL Rezone is in fact the shopping center proposed for the southwest corner of Sunset and Duvall Ave. N.E. If that is correct then we have considered what impact this would have on the sewer system. Especially on the lift station at Sunset and Union N.E. It has been determined that only minor flows would contribute to the over all system and since the flows from the shopping center would occur at different times than the flow from the proposed apartments, no problems are anticipated. 9 RCH :pmp altb JUN 22 1977 I/�G III,,- . ,,,, t 0, e * coDate 6,•-i?-'}e7 U CO: D. Bennett /' R. Puhich R. Nought�n c/ J. Williams V. Lee Cheryl D. Miller Other R. Nel n FROM: WARREN GONN SUBJECT: Review and report back. See me. Jf011 tf and return. 'v//Prepare response for my signature. Take appropriate action. Prepare special report. Set up meeting. For your information. FiZe. REMARKS: o A _ � pF To THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 2 ha CHARLES J. DELAURENTI a MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 0AP:4TeD S E °'1 aC':;thri:8.1 MEMORANDUM `'uN 1 r 977 ;CITY of HEN PU914C WORKS June 16 , 1977 TO : Warren Gonnason , Public Works Director FROM: Michael L . Smith , Associate Planner RE : LOVELESS/POWELL REZONE , NO. R-899-76 As per our discussion of June 16 , 1977 , we would appre- ciate further clarification from your Utilities Division regarding the sewer capabilities for the combined B- 1 and R-2 rezone request . This will be incorporated into the staff report to the Land Use Hearing Examiner. We also understand from you that rights-of-way dedication as proposed are acceptable and that storm drainage plans will provide suitable storm water retention and pollution separation facilities . MLS :wr 4OF .R�,y OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON (7) POST OFFICE BOX 628, 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 255-8878 Ito • •' 0 GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY • 947-Fo SE PO- July 16, 1977 • • • MEMORANDUM RECEIVE® • • CITY OF RENT ON • TO: Rick Beeler, .Hearing .Examiner HEARING EXAMINER • JUL 221977 FROM: Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney AM PM 718191101D1t1L11 t2t3i4i51f RE: . Loveless - Powell, Rezone Covenants ' • Dear' Rick: • Thank you for your memo of July 15, 1977 regarding the above captioned matter. Up to now I have not yet received a copy of your final decision on this application but I have 'checked over the draft of' your "Declaration of Restrictive Covenants" for the Loveless-Powell Shopping Center premises . My comments are as follows, at least on a preliminary basis : a. It would appear that Loveless-Powell have not as yet acquired title to the subject property and they probably are' only the purchasers or optionees. In any event,. they should also be required to sign this declaration anitheir proper status identified. This for the obvious reason that if for any reason the transaction between the 'owners listed and Loveless-Powell.. is .not consummated, then this declaration probably would be meaningless . I am also wondering whether a effective period of close to 50 years is reasonable under the circumstances . • b . Hopefully subparagraph 5 under "Landscaped Areas" can be made more certain by giving a time limitation in which landscaping and fencing are to be installed. A suggestion would be that it be completed not later than 60 to 90 days a$er construction is completed. c. Under "Installation of Off-Site Improvements", could the roadway be more definitely described, i. e. , exact width to avoid any possible argument later on. The last sentence of that section should provide that "Both said roadway improvements' shall be dedicated to the City of Renton, free and clear of all encumbrances . " N! d. I have some doubt about the legality of limiting the construction hours unless we are talking about activities that produce a certain amount of noise or inconvenience to others . For instance if work is done inside the building which does not produce any appreciable noise, there is no reason why such work cannot be performed,.as far as the City is concerned. Prevailing labor union regulations may provide otherwise but it would not be up to the City to prohibit somebody from working after hours , i.e . painters, plasterers,plumbers, etc. . e. Under "Signing" I would suggest that the applicable ordinances be identified by number . We agree with you that these covenants should be executed by all of the parties having an interest in this subject property and then same should be recorded with the County at the time the ordinance is adopted. The ordinance itself will then make reference to the "Declaration of Restrictive Covenants" . If we can be of any further assistance, please let us know. We remain Very truly yours, ams ./7 .,0 erard M. Shellan GMS:bjm AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the /L4ay of July , 19 77 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled • application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this \3day of l,Ar 1911 . \{\\ • \kb Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Loveless/Powell, R-889-76 (The minutes contain a .fist of the paAties of necond) July 11, 1977 OFFICE OF TIC LAND USE HEARIftG EXAMINER • .CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: ' Loveless/Powell, Inc. FILE NO. R-889-76 LOCATION: Southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Ave.. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from G to B-1 and R-2 to allow construction of a neighborhood shopping center complex together with a low density multiple family residential development. The requested R-2 zoning is situated on the approximate southerly 130 feet of the subject site and consists of approximately 1.8 acres. The 9.2 acre majority portion of the subject site will consist of the proposed food center, drug store, hardware store, nursery, and related parking and loading together with a support commercial area of approximately 10,000 square feet near the intersection. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Recommend approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on June 21, 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on June 28, 1977, at 9:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the representative for the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered in the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements Exhibit #3: Site Plan The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to clarify the recommendation to increase the R-2 zone to 145 feet instead of the requested 130 feet. Mr. Smith responded that the purpose of the increase was to establish as wide a buffer as possible between business and residential uses to the north and to maintain maximum flexibility in the R-2 zone. He indicated that 110 net feet remained and would allow for 'approximately 25 to 30 feet for screening purposes on the north side of the proposed apartments. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the deficiency of 121 parking stalls and the possibility of providing parking elsewhere on the site, Mr. Smith stated that a section of the ordinance relates to joint use of facilities or parking areas other than on the site, and suggested that additional parking could be provided within the proposed building pad as well as behind the building. The Examiner asked the representative of the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Dean Tibbott 17003 N.E. 28th Place Bellevue, WA Mr. Tibbott reported that he did not concur with certain portions of the report, and indicated a desire to make a brief presentation regarding the history of site selection for the proposed shopping center. He presented the following exhibits: R-889-76 Page Two Utilizing the map and the overlay, Mr. Tibbott explained the geographical topography of the area in relation to existing thoroughfares, population and existing business zones. He stated that a substantial amount of time and effort had been expended in the evaluation of the proposed site, and felt that the project was compatible with the City of Renton, and its growth prospects, traffic patterns, and Comprehensive Land Use Plan. He reported that the south 130 feet of the property designated for R-2 will be used for residential development at some future time, but no specific plan had been developed as yet. He presented an additional exhibit: Exhibit #6: Revised Site Plan, dated 4-21-77 Prior to entering Exhibit #6 into the record, the Examiner noted minor changes from the originally submitted site plan, Exhibit #3, and asked Mr. Tibbott the extent to which the applicant wished to be bound to the revised site plan. Mr. Tibbott indicated that revisions to the plan would be met by the applicant. The Examiner explained that the rezone could potentially be bound to the site plan, which was acceptable to Mr. Tibbott. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding the deficiency in number of parking stalls, Mr. Tibbott reported that the architect had designed the project utilizing the parking requirements for retail stores, but that parking requirements in the City of Renton were 10o more stringent than in other jurisdictions. He asked the architect to clarify parking areas on the site plan. Responding was: Douglas Mulvanny 1920 Terry Avenue Seattle, WA Mr. Mulvanny indicated the parking areas on the map and reported that an overall evaluation of the gross leasable square footage should be accomplished to arrive at a more accurate figure. Mr. Tibbott emphasized that the application is for rezoning only, although the code would be enforced during construction. He indicated plans to construct a high standard shopping center in developing a now unsightly parcel of property. The Examiner clarified that the proposed site plan must be reviewed since it was made an integral part of the rezone, and a large parking discrepancy existed. The Examiner inquired about fill material on the site. Mr. Tibbott presented photographs of the area which were entered as Exhibit #7. He reported that Cascade Testing Soils Engineering firm had been engaged to determine removal and relocation of existing fill material. The Examiner noted an additional access roadway along the west property line and asked if the road would create a joint access for the development and Honey Dew Apartments. Mr. Tibbott indicated that a 40 foot right-of-way exists on the west side of the property which would be expanded to 50 feet for joint access, and a 20 foot strip will be dedicated south of the property and combined with a 30 foot transmission line easement lying south of the section line to create another 50 foot right-of-way to form a loop perimeter access road to Duvall Avenue N.E. The Examiner inquired about interference with parking at an existing church building. Mr. Tibbott responded that interference would not occur. The Examiner inquired about the removal of existing vegetation on the property. Mr. Tibbott responded that the majority of trees would remain including two or three large cedar trees near the Duvall Avenue frontage and the boundary of the B-1 zone. The Examiner noted that the Planning Department had recommended that parking strips be landscaped and asked Mr. Tibbott if he concurred in this request. Mr. Tibbott stated the preference for perimeter landscaping instead of landscaping within the parking lot. He) indicated a desire to meet with landscaping consultants and staff and reported his intent to design and construct a well-landscaped shopping center. Mr. Smith stated that the ends of the parking stalls are delineated and it is appropriate that they be landscaped to meet ordinance requirements for such landscaping. He indicated the importance of the issue and felt it should be addressed at this time. He referred to the Parking and Loading Ordinance in reference to large parking lots. In response to Mr. Tibbott's inquiry regarding procedure for rezone application, the Examiner stated that if the rezone were approved, the applicant could be bound by a specific plan which would include requirements for parking and landscaping. Mr. Tibbott emphasized that if the site plan, Exhibit #6, became a basic development plan in addition to the rezone request, the applicant understand the city's interpretation ' i R-889-76 Page Three of requirements with regard to landscaping and placement of the driveway onto Duvall Avenue N.E. He indicated that a revision of the location of the driveway to the north was possible in order to save existing trees and concurred in the requirement for landscaping at the ends of the drive aisles. The Examiner indicated that the approved plan could become a binding final configuration with any additional conditions attached to meet the city's requirements. Mr. Tibbott reviewed Exhibit #1, Section P. Planning Department Recommendation. as follows: Items 1 and 2, acceptable as presented in Exhibit #6;• Items 3 through 6, acceptable; Item 7, four-plexes would be established; Items 8 and 9, acceptable! and Item 10, acceptable as presented in Exhibit #6. The Examiner asked for further testimony. Responding was: Shannon O'Neil 1526 Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. O'Neil indicated that he is the owner of four lots east of the proposed project. He indicated concurrence with the rezone request, noting that beautification of the area would result. He expressed the desire for further study for sewer service in the area to avoid future problems. The Examiner stated that he would forward Mr. O'Neil's request to the Utilities and Public Works Departments for their consideration and would relay the information to him. The Examiner asked for further testimony. Responding was: Betty Jo Viaene 4808 N.E. Sunset Blvd. Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Viaene reported that a dangerous traffic situation exists at the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. and asked if the city or state intended to install a stop sign. Mr. Smith stated that the Traffic Engineering Division had scheduled installation of a traffic signal at the subject intersection sometime this summer or fall. Mrs. Viaene inquired about widening Sunset Boulevard to four lanes. Mr. Smith reported that he was not aware of such a plan and no communication had been received from the Traffic Engineering Division to indicate plans for a widening project. The Examiner asked for further testimony. Responding was: Alec Book 1726 Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Book indicated his concurrence with the proposed rezone, stating the area had previously been a dumping area and had created an eyesore for adjacent property owners. The Examiner asked for further comments. Mr. Smith indicated a desire to respond to Mr. Tibbott's comments, and reported that the Planning Department staff report was geared towards receipt of a detailed landscaping plan at the time of building permit application with the responsibility for approval under the Planning Department's jurisdiction. He stated that the report indicated certain flexibility in location of additional landscaping adjacent to the building. In reference to Item P.10 of Exhibit #1 Mr. Smith felt a review of the gross leasable area was necessary. The Examiner stated that the primary remaining item of concern was the 130 feet requested by the applicant for the R-2 zone versus the 145 feet recommended by the Planning Department. Mr. Smith reported that the recommendation was based upon providing an adequate buffer and that with the proposed 20 foot dedication of an easement, the area would be reduced to 110 feet. He 'felt that expansion of the R-2 zone was necessary to accommodate a 25 foot buffer and screening fence as well as providing additional parking space. He stated that the lesser depth proposed by the applicant may be possible through the special permit process with a reduction in density from 16 to 12 units. He indicated an alternative for fencing might be feasible and suggested concrete panels to reduce noise impact. In response to the Examiner's inquiry regarding special permit approval for development in the R-2 zone, Mr. Smith reported that the proposal of an excess of one unit per 7200 square feet would only be allowed in an R-2 zone by special permit. R-889-76 Page Four The Examiner asked Mr. Tibbott for further comments. Mr. Tibbott emphasized that the application request remained 130 feet for R-2 zone with 16 units, allowed by code, to be constructed in the' zone. He also requested that restrictions imposed in Item P.2.d. in Exhibit #1 regarding landscaping wells be flexible. Mr. Smith reported that the Planning Department would coordinate with the applicant regarding landscaping containers and that the item was a flexible requirement. The Examiner expressed concern regarding the deficiency of 114 parking stalls and asked if a possibility existed of utilizing the proposed building pad at the north to provide such parking. Mr. Tibbott reported that the possibility existed and Exhibit #6 illustrated that building area may be considered an envelope or a maximum building line in order to maintain proper circulation and parking. He indicated that a maximum building space of 10,000 square feet was used to create the deficiency and utilizing less than 10,000 square feet would reduce the deficiency. He also felt that the number of parking stalls illustrated on Exhibit #6 satisfactorily met the basic code of retail stores utilizing a ratio of one parking stall per 200 square feet, five parking stalls per 1,000 square feet, and one stall for each 2,000 square feet of open nursery space requirements. The Examiner stated that the Parking and Loading Ordinance defines a shopping center along with minimum parking requirements and suggested that the applicant could apply to the Board of Adjustment for a parking variance. He also reported that it was not under his authority to waive parking requirements. Mr. Mulvanny stated that it was his opinion that the computation in Exhibit #1 for required parking stalls was not accurate because it included the nursery storage area as gross leasable square footage. Mr. Smith stated that the city's ordinance requirements stipulate the number of shopping center parking stalls. The Examiner reported that his recommendation would be based upon the submitted site plan and additional conditions may be imposed. Mr. O'Neil requested that landscaping be minimized at the corner of Duvall Avenue N.E. to prevent obstruction of view for traffic safety purposes. The Examiner asked for further comment. Since there was none, the hearing on Item # R-889-76 was closed by the Examiner at 11:55 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for reclassification of approximately 11 acres now zoned G to 9.2 acres of B-1 and 1.8 acres of R-2 to allow construction of a shopping center and a multifamily buffer area. A site plan for the proposed shopping center (to be located in the requested B-1 zone) and the low density multifamily development (to be located in the requested R-2 zone) was entered into the record by the applicant (Exhibit #6) . It was understood that the site plan could, if the rezone were approved, become binding upon the applicant in terms of future development. The applicant agreed specifically to be bound by the site plan, (Exhibit #6) knowing that conditions could be attached to the rezone, thereby modifying the site plan. The site plan (Exhibit #6) was a revision of the originally submitted site plan (Exhibit #3) of record. Seldom is such a specific site plan submitted with a rezone application and entered into the record. The City Attorney previously advised the Examiner that this was acceptable provided the applicant knew and understood that he could be bound by the site plan with whatever, if any, conditions were attached in the approved rezone. Great care was taken during the public hearing before and after the exhibit was entered into the record to make sure the applicant knew and understood the implications of making the site plan a part of the rezone application and record. However, the City Attorney also had previously advised the Examiner that reasonableness needed to be applied to what specifically would be made binding of the site plan. In any event, the central issue is the requested zoning reclassification, and the site plan is generally evaluated since it was entered into the record. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full herein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Significant Impact has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. An impact statement was prepared, the final draft of which was, issued on June 20, 1977, and is incorporated in full in this report by reference. R-889-76 Page Five 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development and no adverse comment was expressed. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. , 7•. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-708 and 4-711 of the Code. 8. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan (amended February 28, 1977) indicates the property to possibly be Commercial in the northern portion and Low Density Multifamily in the southern portion. Medium Density Multifamily is shown west of the site, Single Family on the south and east, and Commercial on the north and northeast. The Commercial designation would include B-1, and the Low Density Multifamily would include R-2. 9. In general terms, the subject site lies at the bottom of a slight hill and is oriented toward the existing commercial and multifamily uses along Sunset Boulevard. Orientation will be away from the single family areas east of Duvall Avenue N.E. and south of the site. The southeast corner of the site will remain the highest elevation and continue to gently slope to the lowest elevation at the northwest corner. 10. Along the south property line are located two overlapping easements. One easement is 30 feet wide for vehicular access. Overlapping this easement is a 40-foot power transmission line easement. The applicant intends to use the vehicular easement together with 20 feet of his property for access to Duvall Avenue N.E. Construction will be according to city street standards. 11. A soils engineering firm is evaluating the existing landfill on the site. Some of this may be suitable for fill material in the development, but the remainder would be removed from the site. The Environmental Impact Statement indicated that a portion of the less suitable soil around the creek might require removal and replacement with suitable fill material. 12. A storm drainage plan had not been finalized but would be developed in coordination with the Public Works Department. Placing the existing open Honey Dew Creek into culverts covered with landfill was acceptable to the Public Works Department during their evaluation of the preliminary drainage plan. The applicant indicated no change in this concept of accommodating the creek. Proposed on-site water retention provisions were also acceptable. 13. The existing access road along the west boundary of the site serves the Honey Dew apartment complex. This road will be widened to city street standards for joint access. 14. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. can accommodate the additional traffic generated by the shopping center and multifamily development. Installation of a traffic signal will occur within the near future to greatly assist the vehicular movement at this intersection. 15. Few desirable trees exist on the site, and the majority of these have been saved in the site plan. 16. An Indirect Source Permit has been approved by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency. 17. The parking requirement for the shopping center (defined in Section 4-2202.6) is 5.5 parking spaces for 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area. While the site plan indicated that a large number of additional parking stalls must be provided, the applicant expressed the opinion that the parking requirement could be met through further analysis with the Planning Department. However, it appears that the site may be greatly packed with parking in order to meet the parking requirement, without accommodating the proposed future retail buildings at the northeast corner of the site. 18. Interior landscaping in the parking lot has not been provided per Section 4-2204.8. (3) . The applicant prefers to utilize landscaping at the perimeter of the parking areas and site instead of some landscaping within the parking areas. This proposal would constitute a variance which is beyond the Hearing Examiner's authority but must be requested of the Board of Adjustment. R-889-76 Page Six 19. No landscaping is proposed along the north facade of the shopping center building. The applicable portions of city ordinance lack any requirement for installation of such landscaping. However, the applicant expressed a willingness to accommodate the Planning Department's concerns in the design of the final landscape plan. 20. The strip of R-2 is proposed to be 130 feet wide, which is reduced to 110 feet by access easements. Recontouring of the property will occur on the north and south portions of this strip of R-2. The Planning Department recommends an additional 15 feet in width (145 feet) to provide -a more satisfactory living environment for the future residents. This portion of the development is planned for construction after completion of the shopping center. 21. In order to buffer the R-2 portion of the development from the B-1 portion, approximately 25 feet of landscaping is proposed to be installed along the north line of the R-2 area during construction of the shopping center. 22. The proposed 16 dwelling units in the proposed R-2 zone approach a density of 11 units per acre and unit configuration, which Section 4-708. (3) specifies requires a Special Permit. 23. Construction on the site will create sufficient noise to require limiting the hours of operation. The applicant expressed agreement with the staff recommendation to limit working hours from 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. weekdays only. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map encompassing the subject property was modified on February 28, 1977 (Ordinance No. 3112) . According to the Map and applicable Comprehensive Plan policies, the reclassification request is in conformance, therefore it can be concluded: "That the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate. . . " (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . The Objectives of the Land Use Report, pages 17 and 18,have been met by the proposal. Objective number 1 is to: "Prevent blight by protecting residential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay and obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly growth patterns." This site is located in an existing developing commercial node at the intersection of two arterials. Upon annexation, the G (General) zoning classification was applied to the subject property and the area surrounding the intersection. The request represents the initial and largest rezone at this intersection; however, relatively low intensity commercial uses have been allowed at three corners, evidently while the area was still under King County jurisdiction. In addition, it appears that this node continues to develop in the direction of meeting the needs of the expanding population in the general vicinity. As this pressure for commercial uses increases, the subject site receives pressure for commercial uses due to its large, undeveloped state. The configuration of the proposed shopping center and the accompanying R-2 buffer combine to minimize any adverse impacts upon the growth pattern of the area. In all probability the construction of the shopping center will stimulate development of the thinly developed single family property in the area. Objective number 3 states to: "Provide opportunities for employment of the City's residents within convenient walking or commuting distance." The proposed commercial uses will provide employment which predictably would be filled by local residents and probably some of the existing adjacent residents. Objective number 4 requires to: "Protect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners, through effective control of land use and the enforcement and application of building and construction codes. While the proposal represents commercial activity occuring within an existing single family area, the proposal contains sufficient mitigating measures to protect and preserve the residential character beyond the subject site. Eventually the predictable influence of the shopping center will be to facilitate development of the adjacent residential properties to the densities allowed under existing zoning requirements. R-889-76 Page Seven Objective number 6 states to: "Encourage the development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work, shop, live and play. " As specified in the proposed plan, the shopping center and R-2 buffer zone can reasonably be concluded to be the "highest" use for the property. It can also be concluded that the proposal is a reasonable use on that site owing to the characteristics of the site, its environment, and adjacent neighborhood and community. ' From the record, the proposal appears to be a positive land use and aesthetic contribution to the neighborhood and city. The policies of the Comprehensive Plan, page 5, Density Plan, have been met by the proposal. These policies address density for residential development. In the case of multifamily development, a limit of 40 units per acre is specified. The proposal is well below this limit. "Standards for Shopping Centers" are outlined on pages 6 and 7 of the Comprehensive Plan. Standard number 1 requires that the location should generally protect adjacent residential areas from "unwarranted business encroachment" and be convenient to potential customers. The site plan of record indicates that the orientation and buffering of the proposal will minimize pressure for additional commercial uses in the remaining residential property. As the community develops, the clientel of the shopping center will grow. It can be expected that existing residents in the single family areas and in the Honey Dew Apartments will utilize the shopping center instead of traveling greater distances to shop. Standard number 2 requires that the location and design not necessarily contribute to establishing "strip-type business" but should generally be located at the intersection of arterial streets of adjoining neighborhoods. In addition, existing shopping centers are encouraged to expand outward utilizing vacant land. The proposal is located at the intersection of the two arterial streets of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. The design is not of the "strip-type" but of a self-contained, independent shopping center that is set back from the arterials. It is difficult to ascertain if different neighborhoods exist surrounding the intersection; however, Sunset Boulevard appears to act as a barrier to any neighborhood character penetrating beyond it. Very probably, the neighborhood north of Sunset is not identified with that neighborhood lying south of the arterial and vice versa. The proposal will serve both neighborhoods in the area. Standard number 3 requires that the size of the shopping center be governed according to its service/clientel area. To reach a conclusion relative to this standard it must be determined if the proposal will be a neighborhood or community shopping center (assuming not a regional center) . The record and site plan would indicate the proposal to be a community shopping center which also serves the neighborhood. The proposal will occupy slightly more than 9 acres, • which is within the neighborhood center standard. It can quickly be concluded that the proposal will predominantly serve the existing neighborhood; however, the marketing information presented in the hearing indicates that customers will be drawn from the general community. As the general area of the proposal develops to a greater intensity than the existing predominantly low density single family land use and undeveloped areas are developed, the center will serve more people than the immediate neighborhood(s) . To summarize, the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan policies and Land Use Map. and, accordingly, should be approved. 2. Since the site plan was submitted for the record and agreed by the applicant to be binding, the site plan was reviewed and it appears after this review that some general conditions should be attached to reduce the impact of the proposal upon the surrounding properties. It is unreasonable to limit the uses to those specified in the site plan. However, it is reasonable to adhere to the building areas shown on the site plan since parking is such a critical issue in this application. The proposed 99,610 square feet of building and nursery area should be considered as a maximum for this site unless some of the future .10,000 square foot "building pad" can be utilized after the parking requirements are fulfilled. The "building pad" area was not of sufficient detail for analysis at this time. Since parking is critical on this site and access to Duvall Avenue N.E. and Sunset Boulevard is potentially critical adjacent to the "building pad" area, the final site plan for this future area should be approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments. Traffic to and from the shopping center will be significant; therefore, it is reasonably required that the loop, perimeter access road be dedicated and developed to city street standards. R-889-76 Page Eight 3. The parking and landscaping requirements for the proposed shopping center can be satisfactorily resolved with the Planning Department staff for compliance with city ordinances. Sufficient testimony was entered into the record to demonstrate that the requirements of applicable city ordinances could be met. 4. Access to and from the site will be adequate as proposed. However, as the applicant indicated in the hearing, the specific location of curb cuts along Duvall Avenue N.E. may require further evaluation and revision. This can be accomplished with city staff during preparation of the final site plan for application for a building permit. 5. Storm drainage can be adequately accommodated through meeting the requirements of the Public Works Department. A final storm drainage plan should be approved prior to clearing and grading of the site, exclusive of removal of existing fill material. In order to assist the Public Works Department's evaluation of the plan, a report from the soils engineer consultant should be submitted. 6. Timing of development of the proposed R-2 area is not critical to the shopping center development. The applicant has indicated that 25 feet of landscape buffer along the boundary of the R-2 and B-1 zones will be implemented during construction of the shopping center to buffer the shopping center from the R-2 area as well as contribute to the buffering of the R-2 zone from the single family area to the south. 7. Per Section 4-708 of the Building Regulations (R-2 District) , the applicant is required to apply for a Special Permit in order to construct 11 units per acre or buildings containing more than two units. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, findings and conclusions, it is recommended that the rezone from G to B-1 and R-2 as indicated in the application and Exhibit #6, dated April 21, 1977, be approved subject to: 1. Development of a shopping center and R-2 buffer as contained in the site plan of record (Exhibit #6, dated April 21, 1977) and meeting applicable requirements of city ordinances applicable thereto. 2. Final site and landscape plans approval by the Planning and Public Works Departments for conformance with the site plan of record (Exhibit #6, dated April 21, 1977) and applicable city ordinances. Landscaping of the public right- of-way adjacent to the site to be compatible with the landscape plan for the site. 3. Public Works Department approval of the storm drainage plan prior to clearing or grading of the site, except that existing fill material on the site may be removed for compliance with applicable ordinances. 4. Retention of as many of the significant trees on the site as possible according to the site plan (Exhibit #6, dated April 21, 1977) . 5. Development and dedication of the perimeter access loop to city standards per the site plan (Exhibit #6, dated April 21, 1977) . 6. Construction hours limited to 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. weekdays only. 7. Approval of signing by the Planning Department for conformance with applicable city ordinances. 8. Installation of 25 feet of intensive landscape screening and 6-foot architectural- type fence along the southern boundary of the B-1 zone during installation of the landscaping for the shopping center per Exhibit #6, dated April 21, 1977. ORDERED THIS llth day of July, 1977. . 6111101L ewer 1 Land Use Hearing Examiner R-889-76 Page Nine TRANSMITTED THIS llth day of July, 1977 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Dean Tibbott Douglas Mulvanny Shannon O'Neil Betty Jo Viaene Alec Book TRANSMITTED THIS llth day of July, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before July 25, 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. ®� :. ® THE. CITY OFRENTON ® MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 p ans. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'O �Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235 - 2593 ' ED.SEPI� June 30, 1977 • MEMORANDUM TO: Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director FROM: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Loveless/Powell, Inc. Rezone Application - Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. At the June 28, . 1977, public hearing on this application and in the Environmental Impact Statement, it was mentioned that a five-phase traffic signal was scheduled for installation at this intersection. An estimate was given that the installation will occur this summer or. fall. Do you have a more specific date for the ,installation? Every indication is that this signal will greatly alleviate the current traffic problems at this intersection as well as mitigate most of the traffic impacts resulting from the shopping center development. The applicant entered the site plan, as a part of the record and understood that it would be binding upon him. Therefore, if need be, you can refer to that plan. Please provide your response by July 7, 1977, so I can incorporate this information into my final report. • (j:p ' L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner ' LRB:mp cc: Mike Smith, Planning Department • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT z o WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E. • DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING .200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 206 235-2569 • pA �. 0 4TF p SEP1t�� CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • . MAVOR July 5 , 1977 TO: RICK BEELER • Hearing Examiner • FROM: WARREN C. GONNASON Public Works Director RE : TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION SUNSET BOULEVARD $ DUVALL AVENUE NE • In response- to your memo ,of June 30 , 1977 , please be - . advised that we have received an affirmative letter from the State Highway Department for submittal of plans and specifications for the above-referenced traffic signal installation. However , we cannot give you a specific date of installation until the plans and specifications are approved by the Washington State Department of Highways . We do anticipate construction may begin by September of this year, with approximately 90 days for completion of the project. • GEM: cah. cc: Del Bennett RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER l.,`... 61977 AM PM• '7,8 9,i0,llel21 i f213140516 • a Loveless/Powell, inc. � 606- 110th Northeast,Suite 105, Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206)455-0390 REj1/ �CFIIIED 'o March 4, 1977 ;;' ��- MAR 7 1977 Mr. Mike Smith � < <v Planning. Department �4� • , City of Renton - Municipal Bldg. Renton, Washington Re: Renton, 'Washington SWC Sunset $ Duvall Dear Mike: In accord with yesterday's discussion I am submitting herewith an amended Rezone Application. This amendment picks up those changes which we entered onto your file copy and which I initialled in your office yesterday.. With this amended application and with the EIS which I submitted to you yesterday, we hereby request that you reactivate our Rezone ' Application and set a hearing date at your earliest convenience. Regards, Dean Tibbott DT:mh P.S. We are arranging for revised site plans and shall submit extra copies to you in about one week. Developers, Contractors, Property Management pF RFC CITY OF RENTON � ��` RECEIVED )o REZONE APPLICATION 2 ; MAR 7 1977 • For Office Use Only: �9 2 APPL. NO. R-889-76 PLANNING COMMISSION R�� $50 FEE; RECEIPT NO. 9861 APPEAL FILED FILING DATE 10/5/76 CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE 11/5/76 ORDINANCE NO . & DATE AMENDED 3/3/77 APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1. Name LOVELESS/POWELL, INC. phone 455-0390 2. Address 606-110th Ave. N.E., Suite 105, Bellevue, Wash. 98004 South side of the 3 . Property petitioned for rezoning is located. on Sunset Highway between Duvall and Anacortes 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 11 acres ± 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach separate sheet) Tracts No. 8 and 9, Joseph P. Marshall Tracts according to the plat thereof recorded in Volwne 38 of Plats, page 30, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT those portions dedicated for road purposes. 6 . Existing zoning` G Zoning Requested B-1 4 R-2 NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet . (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7 . Proposed use of site. Neighborhood shopping center $ low density multi-family esidentiaL.--.— B-1 = Tracts 89 less S_ 130' • R-2 = S. 130' of Tracts 8$9 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Ten feet along the entire western boundary of the property and twenty feet along the southern perimeter wihlhe dedicated to__ the City of Renton for street purposes. To the rear of the project, —_ there will be a landscape and multi-family buffer zone, measuring approximately 110' in depth by 608' in width to screen the development from the single family zoning to the south. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Begin construction June, 1977. _ • 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept . 2-73 RftENED op CITY OF RENTON I OCT 5 1976 REZONE APPLICATION -% For Office 'H, Use Only: APPL. NO. .2"--2C9.- 76 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION $50 FEE; RECEIPT O. mi APPEAL FILED FILING DATE 1p �/71� CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE /i-io - ' ORDINANCE NO. & DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1. Name C.E. Loveless and Lloyd W. Powell phone 455-0390 2. Address 606-110th Ave. N.E. , Suite 105, Bellevue, Wash. 98004 South side of the 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Sunset Highway between Anacortes and 138th Avenue S.E. 4. Square footage or acreage of property 11 acres ± . 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach ,f'; separate sheet) All of Lots 8 and 9 of the Joseph P. Marshall tracts, as per plats recorded in Volume 38 of Plats, Page 30, records of King County in King County, Washington. 6. Existing zoning Ge-n B s e—&s--&'RI Zoning Requested Commercial NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. Neighborhood shopping center. ' 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Thirty feet along the entire western boundary of the property and thirty feet along the southern perimeter will be dedicated to the City of Renton for street purposes. To the rear of the project, there will be an extensive landscape buffer zone, meas- uring approximately 90 ' in depth by 575' in width to screen the development from the single family residence. 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Begin construction April, 1977. • 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. AFFIDAVIT We, C.E. Loveless and Lloyd W. Powell, being duly sworn, declare that we hold an option to purchase the property involved in this application, and have the consent of the owners of the property to make this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of our know- ledge and belief. Subscribed and- sworn before me this 5 day of a 6 197; Notary Public in and for the State of • (�'-'tom/V✓ '—` \ 1 Washington, residing at „// Name of Totar Public) (Si n re o GwItel (Signature of. Owner) , /(,('O a A (5 /G- 606-110th Ave. N.E. (Address) (Address) Note: Property is not currently owned in fee but there are signed executed options to purchase same. Bellevue, Wash. 98004 (City) (State) 455-0390 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certi at°�� oregoing application has been inspected by me and has b n`f e t��t" cb thorough and complete in every part- icular and to • 1 lithe 'les and regulations of the Renton Planning Depa nt governing _ne filing of such application. Date Received 06 19 By: 4*Ike late Q. Renton Planning Dept. CA oF CITY OFREiITOId, �dASH1NGTON • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (c). Ra%/Pi), • • . .� ACTft • AN FOR OFFICE USE ONLY /gi� fix, EPA Application No. Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date : —_—__-___—____-_—__ • I1 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance LiDeclaration of Non-Significance [ ] Declaration of Non-Significance • COMMENTS : - --- • • Introduction ' The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43 .21C , RCW, requires an state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act• also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. . The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. • Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers •you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. - The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed , . even though completion tray not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperriork in the future . hUIE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it no and continue on to the next question. • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM • I . BACKGROUND 1 . Name of Proponent - C.E. Loveless and Lloyd W. Powell • 2 . Address and phone number of Proponent : 606-110th Avenue N. E. , Suite 105 Bellevue, Washington 98004• . 455-0390 • • 3. Date Checklist submitted October 5 , 1976 4 . Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton , Planning Dept . 5 . flame of proposal , if applicable : • 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size , general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Buildings are to be architecturally designed of masonry construction consisting of 94 , 224 square feet of build- - ings and 9 , 300 square feet of nursery. The project will be served by two major arteries , Sunset and 138th1 and is oriented toward providing shopping facilities for the - -- i- nediate residential area. - — -- -- - • - -- -- • -2- • • 7. Location of proposal - (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land •area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The site is on the southwest corner on 138th and Sunset. • It has a gradual slope, sloping upward_to the south and consists of swamp, brush, debris, fill and grasslands. 8. Estimated date fur completion of the proposal : • December, 1977 9. List of all permits , ' licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : State and local . environmental approvals, City of Renton rezone applications , Building Permits City of Renton. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity . related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain: None • • • • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: • No • • 12 . Attach any other .application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed , 'but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See attached application for. tezoning. • • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC1S • . (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) • ( 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic • substructures? X YES 1 AYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? X YES-7 MAYBE NO (c). Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES I1�FBE No (d) The destruction , covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X _ 0 DE NO (e) Any increase in wind or ,.,ater erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X_ YES MAYBE NO • (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition -or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Y �5 M/YBE NO Explanation: 1 (b). — Site will require substantial cut and fill . • 1 (c) - Site must be leveled to provide parking .area. • -3- - • • (2) Air. Will the proposal result in : • (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . ' X YES 1AYUE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? x- YES MAY[sE NO (c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , •either locally or X regionally? • YES MAYBE NO , • Explanation: 2 (a) — The presence of automobiles will result in . exhaust emission's. • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X_ YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the' rate . and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE ' NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface ,water in any water body? x- • YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water. quality, including but not lmited to • X temperature, 'dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ YES FMYBE Nb (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow 'of • ground waters? -• X • YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through . . interception of an aquifer by scUts or excavations? X YES MAYBE• NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through • direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria , X or other substances into the, ground ,waters? • 'YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X 1'ES MAYBE iO Explanation: 3 (b) (c). Since Honeydew Creek will be culverted, . this may affect current, aquatic life , and eliminate flood • • waters which now occur on the site in the winter. • (4) Flora. _Will the proposal result in: • (a ) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees., shrubs , grass , crops , X microf era and aquatic plants)? YES M.;- E ti'O (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species 'of flora? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? ' YE MAYBE NO- (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X ' YES RTYBE WO Explanation: __4 (a) Much of the existing plant life will be removed for parking area 4 (b) . It is not known if the area contains unique or endangered species of flora 4 (c) since the project will be landscaped. New species will be in— troduced to the location. ;°L1 -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a ) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES— MAYBE - (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or. endangered species of fauna? X__ YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X of fauna? YES MAYBE NO' (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES- MAYBE NO Explanation: 5 (a) ® (c) (d) The culverting of Honeydew Creek could affect water life forms . It is not known if the area is inhabited by unique or rare species of fauna. (6) N_oi_se. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation : Noise levels as the result of shoppers and their vehicles in the parking areas will increase noise levels. (7) . Li_Chtand Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The parking areas, as well as stores, will . be sufficiently lighted. However, the lights are designed with canopies , which will shield the light source from -----tie residential area. -- - - = - - - - - ----(8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X _ • YES MAYBE NO Ex:pl_anation: • Presently 20% of the- site has been designated • for commercial use and the balance for single 'family development. (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? _ X YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES NTI,Y6E P1G Explanation: • ( 10) Risl. of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . X_ YES MAYBE HO • • • • .( 11 ) Population.. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X • 1'E5 MAYBE NO_ Explanation: - -- --- — -- --- -- - — - • • -5- ( 12) . Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or create a demand for additional housing? • _ _ X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : The project will require the removal of two homes . The project could conveivably prompt some additional residential building. (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : • (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? _X_ __ YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects 'on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? • X_ YES MAYBE NO (c) impact upon existing transportation systems? _ X YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail .or air traffic?, _X • YES MAYBE NO • • (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X • • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: B (a) Auto. traffic from shoppers 13 (b)' a parking lot must be - constructed on—site 13 (d) the additions of •- .Anacortes Avenue and a new road to the south of the proposal will change traffic patterns to some degree. . (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have . an effect upon , or result in ' a need for new or altered governmental services • in any of the following areas : • • (a) fire protection? .. X YES MAYBE NO_ (b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? _ X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MKYBE NO • (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X • YES MAYBE NO • (f) Other governmental services? . E5_ X Y MAYEE NO Explanation : 4 (a) & (b) Adequate fire and police _protection must be provided, which should not naccssarily require ea—_ handed services. 14 (e) The two new streets will require maintenance . -Ample tax revenue to cover cost of above. ( 15) Enercy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial. amounts of fuel or energy? X YES_ MAYBE NO • (b) ue' _r,o :c,. e , istina Sources of energy, or require the he• ._ic•, ent of ❑_k sources cf energy? _- X 1'ES htnYBE NO Explanation: 15 (b) The center will require energy for lighting and heating purposes . (16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? X_ YES MAYBE NO (b) _Communications systems? _ X_ • YES_ MAYBE NO (c) inter? • X• YES MAYBE NO • • • • • �. -6 (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X. YES MAYBE NO • X . (e) Storm water drainage? _ YES MAYBE i O • (f) Solid waste and disposal ? _ X YES MAYBE r10 • Explanation: All_utilitiesrequiredarolocated at the boundaries of the site. ____ • ( 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the 'creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding X mental health)? 7—ES FAYBE NO • Explanation: — — -- — --- -- - --- • (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , -or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X_ YES MAYBE NO Eulanation: • • • ( 19) Recreation. Will` the proposal result i'n an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? • __ _ X Y.ES MAYBE NO Explanation: . • • (20) Archeological/i1i_storical . .Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical • X site, structure , object or building? • _ • YES M'AYBE N0 • Explanation: • • • I1.I . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to. the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may 'withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reli nce upon ' hi iecklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful la of f 11 d sclosure on m part . Proponent : : - --- - - - .. - igned (named �- Pis • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • • • • • • Loveless/Powell, inc. �� 606- 110th-Northeast, Suite 105, Bellevue,Washington 98004 (206) 455-0390 II -October-5, 1976 — City of Renton Mr. Michael—Smith_ - -- - - - - -- - - Associate Planner Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Proposed Neighborhood Shopping Center' iplv f Sie-e s-S 33/vd, Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed please find the following: 1. A Rezone Application 2 . Affidavits of Ownership 3 . Vicinity Maps • 4 . Plot Plans 5 . Site Plans 6. Environmental Worksheets 7. Check for $50.00 • Since you suggested that the development may require a re- vision to the comprehensive general plan, we have enclosed an application for a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment. • Accompanying this application are: 1. Affidavits of Ownership 2 . Plot Plans 3. Vicinity Maps 4. Environmental Checklists 5. Check for $100. 00 We hope that the applications _ are complete and understandable. I would like to thank you for the personal attention you have given this matter, as well as the cooperation of your entire department. Sincerely, LOVELESS/POWELL, INC. Ak OF Steve Kuszpit REaIItb o SK:sp ;CT 5 -o me Enclosures yL .....�� • 'VG oc Developers, Contractors, Property Management 2, DEP MI ' NJOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON JUNE 28 , 19 77 , AT 9 :00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. C. E. LOVELESS AND LLOYD W. POWELL , REZONE FROM G TO B-1 AND R-2 , File No. R-889-76; . property located at the southwest corner of N . E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Ave . N . E./138th Ave . S. E. 2 . ROBERT E. PETET, APPLICATION FOR TWO LOT SHORT ,PLAT APPROVAL , File No. 047-77 , �and APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File No, -W-048-77 ; property located in the vicinity of 2002 Duvall Ave . N. E . Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 28,. 1977 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED June 17, 1977 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR -'. CERTIFICATION I ," ;>.\tMi.chael L. Smith. ,, HEREBY .CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF ,THE ABOVE' DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON \THir,_OR'OPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: 'Subscribed .and sworn to before' ne, a Not ry Public, on the \?) -day of -SvnQ) 19 `1l SIGNE �ott `-(`n NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON NOVEMBER 10 , 19 , AT 8 : 00 P . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . VARIANCE FROM THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ; file No . V-880-76 ; property located in the vicinity of 2700 Mountain View Ave . No . » 12 . REZONE FROM G TO B- 1 ; file No . R-889-76 ; property located at the southwest corner of Sunset Highway and 138th Ave . S . E . 3 . REZONE FROM R- 1 AND S- 1 TO R-1 , R-2 , R-3 AND R-4 ; file No . R-891-76 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple V alley Highway ) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-Way . 4 . REZONE FROM R-1 TO B-P ; file No . R-892-76 ; property located at 437 South Whitworth Ave . 5 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-893-76 ; property located on West Valley Highway approx . 450 ' north of S . W. 43rd St . ' 6 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-894-76 ; property located on Lind Ave . S . W. and S . W . 10th St . within Earlington Industrial Park . • 7 . SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN AN M-P ZONE ; file No . SA-895-76 ; property located on Lind Ave. S . W . and S . W . 10th St . within Earlington Industrial Park . 8 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT ; file No . W-888-76 ; property located at 2415 Meadow Ave . No . Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the . Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON NOVEMBER 10 , 1976 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . SANDRA GIST , SECRETARY PUBLISHED October 31 , 1976 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , MICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. / / ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED �Gc , on the 28thday of October , 1976 RECEIVED r. CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,)U��v 2 1977 AM PM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER 7,819110,111I2,1r2t3,4,5,6 PUBLIC HEARING JUNE 28 , 197E HI 1T NO 2 APPLICANT: LOVELESS/POWELL, INC. ITEM NO. 'f- 76 FILE NO. : R-889-76 , REZONE REQUEST FROM G (GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT) TO B-1 (BUSINESS DISTRICT) AND R-2 ( RESIDENCE DISTRICT) A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from G to B-1 and R-2 to allow construction of a neighborhood shopping center complex together with a low density multiple family residential development . The requested R-2 zoning is situated on the approximate southerly 130 feet of the subject site and consists of approximately 1 . 8 acres . The 9 . 2 acre majority portion of the subject site will consist of the proposed food center, drug store , hardware store , nursery , and related parking and loading together with a support commercial area of approximately 10 ,000 square feet near the intersection . • B. GENERAL INFORMATION: • 1 . Owner of Record : RUSSELL COLLINS , ALICE KYLE , AND KOHL EXCAVATING , INC . 2 . Applicant : LOVELESS/POWELL , INC . 3 . Location : Southwest corner of N. E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Ave. N . E. 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 11 acres . 6 . Access : Via N . E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Ave . N . E. 7 . Existing Zone : G, General Classification District. 8. Existing Zoning B-1 , Business District ; R-3 , Residence Multi - in the Area : family ; G-7200 , General Classification District ; G , General Classification District ; and King County SR, Suburban Residential . .•, 9 . Comprehensive Commercial and L.ow Density Multi-family Land Use Plan : Residential . 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle an.d posted in six places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . Notice was also mailed to surrounding property owners . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To attain proper zoning to allow future development for shopping center and low density multiple family residential development. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2498 on May 27 , 1968 • . The subject site was within a general area which was the subject of a Comprehensive Plan amendment on March 9 , 1977 , by Ordinance 3112 . The site had been partially filled while still within King County jurisdiction . . . `PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JUNE 28, 1977 PAGE TWO RE : LOVELESS/POWELL , INC . REZONE APPLICATION R-889-76 E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The initial one-third of the site adjacent to Sunset Boulevard is relatively level , although scattered deposits of fill material create certain irregularities in the topography . The southerly two-thirds of the property rises gently and is within the southerly one-third of the site at an elevation of approximately 5 to 15 feet above the level of the front portion of the site adja- cent to Sunset Boulevard . 2. Soils : Alderwood (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil . Runoff is slow to medium, and hazard of erosion is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture , row crops , and urban development. The northerly one-third of the site consists of Shalear Muck (Sm) . This soil is associated with the small drainage creek that runs through this portion of the property from east to west. However, previous filling activity has covered certain portions of the original soil . 3 . Vegetation : The northerly one-thir'd of the site is relatively cleared. The remainder of the site contains- primarily small scrub trees and brush . Several large cedar trees presently exist near Duvall Avenue N. E . at the southerly one-third of the site . 4. Wildlife: Existing vegetation on the site , together with the small stream, provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: A small stream exists in the northerly one-third of the sub- ject site and flows in a direction from east to west. This stream eventually connects to the Honeycreek/May Creek drainage system. 6. Land Use : There are two existing single family residences , together with appurtenant structures located in the southerly half of the subject site . There are existing business uses located across Sun- set Boulevard north of the subject site and on the other three cor- ners of the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N . E . ° Several multi -family residential developments exist west of the site on the north side of Sunset Boulevard . Several single family resi - dences exist west of the subject site . The 300± unit Honeydey Apart- ment complex is located near the southwest corner of the subject site . An existing church is located south of the subject site with several single family residences situated south and west of the church . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The area consists of a mixture of land uses . Commercial uses are oriented towards the major intersection of Sunset and Duvall . Multi -family uses are located along Sunset Boulevard and west of the subject site , with low density single family residences interspersed in the general area . The area can be considered in a growth transitional area from single family residence to higher intensity uses , primarily due to the influ- ence of the major arterials . Existing platted single family residential areas are located generally south and west of the subject site . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 12 inch water main exists along N . E. Sunset Boule- vard together with a 12 inch sewer main and 12 inch storm sewer. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordi - nance requirements . Any future development of the site will be sub- ject to the City of Renton standards . 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route 42 operates near the general area . Metro has indicated a future increase in bus service to this area . • ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JUNE 28, 1977 PAGE THREE RE : LOVELESS/POWELL , INC. REZONE APPLICATION R-889-76 4 . Schools : The site is within one-fourth mile of Hazen High School , within two miles of McKnight Middle School , and within one mile of Honeydew Elementary School and Sierra Heights Elementary School . 5 . Parks : The subject site is within one mile of Kiwanis Park and within one mile of the proposed King County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary School , H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-725 ., Amendments . 2 . 4-729G, General Classification District. 3 . 4-711 , B- 1 , Business District. 4. 4-708 , R-2 , Residence District . 5 . Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading . I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , pages 17 and 18 , Objectives . 2 . Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 5 , number 2 , Community, and pages 6 and 7 , F . , Standards for Shopping Centers . J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezoning the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However, eventual development of the site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase water runoff, have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . The existing stream crossing the site will be culverted and filled . An environmental impact state- ment pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act has been prepared for the subject proposal . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: Changing the use from relatively undeveloped property to commercial and low density multiple family residential may result in additional social interaction at the site as well as on surrounding properties . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW-43-216 ) , a Declara- tion of Significant Impact has been issued for the subject proposal and an environmental impact statement prepared . The Final Environmental Impact Statement was issued on June 20 , 1977 , a copy of which is sub- mitted with this report . Additional copies are available in the Plan- ning Department. M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . See list of recipients of Final Environmental Impact Statement. 2 . City of Renton Building Division . 3. City of Renton Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department. 6. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Department. ` - -- Copies of memos from certain departments are attached. . • •PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JUNE 28, 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : LOVELESS/POWELL , INC . REZONE APPLICATION R-889-76 0, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The subject request is in conformance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the area . 2 . The Public Works Department has indicated that sufficient utilities are available to serve the site for the intended use . 3. The Public Works Department has indicated that the proposed rights- of-way dedication and development of boundary streets along the south and west sides of the subject site to full City standards is accept- able. 4. The Public Works Department has indicated that storm drainage and oil /water separation facilities will be developed in accordance with City of Renton standards and King County inter-agency agreement for proper storm water retention and pollution control . 5 . The proposed R-2 zone is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and , together with the proposed street and existing. church facility , will establish an effective transitional buffer area between the commer- cial and single family residence land uses . However , additional screening and buffering will be needed in the area between the pro- posed commercial and R-2 uses . This should be sufficient to reduce both visual and noise impacts of the commercial development and loading activities . 6 . Proper site interior and perimeter landscaping should be provided to assist in reducing visual and traffic circulation impacts of the proposed commercial development. 7 . An existing easement road running north to Sunset Boulevard across • the approximate middle of the subject site and serving as access to several single family residences south of the subject site will be eliminated by the subject development and replaced by the dedi - cated public right-of-way along the southerly edge of the site out ' to .Duvall Avenue N. E . 8. An Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to State law has been prepared for the subject proposal . 9 . The proposed rezone has been reviewed and approved by other City departments . 10 . An Indirect Source Permit for the subject proposal has been approved by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of the rezone request to B- 1 and R-2 zoning in the southerly portion of the property to a depth no less than 145 feet subject to the following conditions : 1. Final site approval by the Planning Department. 2 . Final detailed landscape plan for the entire site development shall be subject to approval of the Planning Department at the time of building permit. Such landscape plan shall include , but not be limited to, the following conditions which are established to reduce the various impacts of the development : a . Those portions of the rights-of-way adjacent to the site peri - meter shall be incorporated into the landscaping plans . b. The significant evergreen trees existing on the site shall be retained and incorporated into the landscape plans as much as • 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF JUNE 28, 1977 PAGE FIVE RE : LOVELESS/POWELL , INC. REZONE APPLICATION R-889-76 possible. These trees shall not be removed without prior approval of the Renton Planning Department. c . Site interior landscaping shall be provided to control traffic circulation and reduce visual impacts . Such land- scaping shall be in the form of landscape islands at both ends of parking stall banks , as at major entrances on Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N . E . d. Landscaping wells shall be placed in front of the buildings 50 feet on center to reduce the visual impacts of the large structure . e . A minimum 25 foot landscape strip suitable for screening pur- poses shall be placed adjacent to the north line of the R-2 zone at the time of construction of the shopping center. Such landscaping strip shall also include a minimum 6 foot archi - tectural -type screening fence along the entire southerly perimeter of the shopping center development . 3 . All rights-of-way required by the Public Works Department for cir- culation and access around site perimeter shall be dedicated and improved to required City standards and widths . 4 . Final detailed storm drainage plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department, including but not limited to , suitable on-site storm water retention and oil /water separation facilities consistent with City requirements and King County interagency agreement. 5 . Suitable on-site sedimentation ponds and i,--, ;or drainage. plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department prior to clearing and grading on the site . 6 . Construction hours at the site shall be limited to between 7 : 30 a .m. and 6 : 30 p .m. weekdays only. • 7 . Any proposed development within the proposed R-2 area shall be subject to Special Permit approval . 8 . All signing related to site usage shall be subject to Planning Department approval . 9 . All utilities shall be subject to City of Renton requirements and Public Works Department approval . 10. Parking required by ordinance (5 . 5 spaces per 1 ,000 square feet of leasable area ) equals 5-8paces . Parking provided on pre- liminary site plan equals 468 spaces . The subject development shall meet parking and loading ordinance requirements . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �I J 2 may- ;"Tx, g WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E. • DIRECTOR ` • . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 206 235-2569 n4TED SE13-C - CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR June 14 , 1977 TO : MICIIAEL SMITH Associate Planner FROM: WARREN GONNASON Public Works Director RE : LOVELESS/POWELL REZONE From G to B-1 #R- 899- 76 The appropriate divisions of the Public Works Department have reviewed the above-referenced rezone and have no objections . • Vie,-.7-2,.„,„,A ch ®`R �/ti` /JcN (3/41/ Ju14 14 - i-I Of R. A e► •^0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT vs C) ♦%.: ,` 2 .,-, :7, BUILDING DIVISION 23,5 -2540 c� mm. x` rn MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 iA 0 o'pgTFD SEPS -�4fr� June 10, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR , TO: Warren C. Gonnason FROM: Jim Hanson SUBJECT: Loveless & Powell Rezone We have no objection to rezone as proposed. JCH/mp . 0 • A'�(7'0-rC: �,F�1IED'Y °� R� JUN 14 1977 , `NNG DEp INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date June 9, 1977 TO: Warren C. Gonnason FROM: Richard C. Houghton SUBJECT: Loveless & Powell , Southwest Quandrant Duvall and Sunset Per attached file, the developer has met all our requirements and we have no other comments. RCH:pmp Attachment ' a • R� �" /� ark ,' ,- r� 01 C- c; .ti W�_�.' yT se .Y . ° .s N t 1ThLi± G j!.. _ MI MR- - V.V. z , i 1 _.d --�----- ••I-,I I IIF_ ---- N.<.,lM .T. 1 - • i,3L Tw 5T.- lS F_ t e. ¢ ln. aT. a.,tn. ee,`J ion¢,.i.]K,G n, ... ..... .. R-3 • I I .... .... :1:•' •o•••••••i••• 1 • • • • • • 4` • • • • •'• •?. • • • • • • 4 11 - v"� •••:••••• •• i a 1 in - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' 1 I: - • • • • • • • ie.) all. i s '0°��o� R-3 1 5E 0 a n..a. - t,. ;in s, -.tr al-d Iay N.E. M Y y1 A ! r IIM fT I I Ili t , I I 1 7d ,o •� r Q ,5. ♦ T;r~.®n n l oaTi�'lla• I G 1 0� �: "-p-.LP/ e r , .1 I{r�e.< 'II aJ 4.SpnW C ` .allTM"i t`� I I I/Q�11 f a ,, ,�;�fps © , Y s 0� Y�,j.1I.I1I +I _1,I. , i , 1 . , I •. ,o�eg ♦ �„ .�.,1„11I1a ptiLicm.7 it 1 iiro um i i •..1 , E ul 1 I. 1. .....„, t 1.7.. •L.� t 'l Z 4 dId b •— i4 r ' t 1f(( A Z , r' , a 1 , ,,, , .t ., 111 • REZONE : C . E . LOVELESS AND LLOYD W. POWELL • Appl . No . R-889-76 ; Rezone from G to S- 1 and R-2 ; property located at the southwest corner of N . E . Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N . E . APPLICANT LOVELESS/POWELL TOTAL AREA ±11 . 1 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N. E . Sunset Blvd . and Duvall Ave . N . E . EXISTING ZONING G EXISTING USE Single Family Residence/Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Shopping Center COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial COMMENTS g (Di • "r/...'' as 3 14 co4huom.. Iii 1C3 a su�+GE el YrAtfou • /2 0 El 0 0( ..••:::.:e:.:.• •• •. • . . • • . • e • • . • • . • • • • . • • • • . • • . e . 0 0 0 46%14 a • •°•I ••••••••••••••e•••••.. ••.:ee•.'� ,•:.:::•.•.•.•.• ••.•:.•.�,� • •e •• •• •• •• •;i1• • • • • • • • • e • • • . 1 ::•::e:.. . • • •'• e e • e • • • • • ,pJ . . . . . . . . .:. • • . ° ° eeee • eee 1 . . . . . . . . . . .1 .•.•.::•.•.•.•.:•.•.•: 7 .•e:•••:.•.•e•e••'e•. •'' ' • • • • • • • • • t0:a • . :• • e ° ° ° ° :.:. • • • • • • • • e • • • • . i • • • • • • o • • • • • • y0 , ................° .s ........ °'e.e ...•....G....• • • N. . . . . . a . . . . . . . . a a`. . . . . . . . . . .....° ° • °•• '• • • • • •'•'.•.•:•e•e•••0•'• 9••••e•••••'••41610•,0••••••6 Q •::• :•:0I.• • • . •,• • • • • • • • • • • • 441 S.R •e 1 •e. •e;•:•;•;°;°;•;•;•;•e rr • • • • • • • • • • • • • e ` • • • • • • e e • P• • ..•••.0.0..e. e:.• y.• • . . . . . . . . .��• . • .8209 OEI••:• ••••••.•.• 4� :.• a 1T°.':.°.•.•.•. . ••• ■� )0.10.0.0.0.0.6.0 4160.0Y 0.0. •.4.•e.•e•.e•••• •.•e.e • . . . . . . . . . .• e . .• fie... ...�.r..,• . . . . GiTY ` ''••••e•e•• •••e•e••.•• • • • e • • • o • • • ••. • • • ,'.•••:.••ee•:••°e••.� ...e.•., ••ee•:••••••e•.•.•e•••••• LIM. • • • • • • • • • • 4 • •.• • Ile.• • • • • . • • • e • • J °• • • . • • • ••• • ••// • • • • • • e .". .•e • • • • . • • k .....................' • • • • • e . • • • • • • • • •• • . • • • • • • •• . • • • • • • • • • a • • • , • • • • • • • • • • ::• •.°•e'.ee••••••••••••••• 60, '1•••••:••e.•ee•••••e•••.•e••' •.•••:••e•ee.•••e•:.•••• �i::e::::::::•e:•ee:'�••:•::::.:::•:•: 1. �. :.•. :.::::•.•.•.•. :•:.:•.:•.•.•°•.:•.•. Je°.... . . . . . .•. . . . . . .......... • 41 • �:•e•• •• • • • •e• •'• • • • ••• •• •• •• :••. •eeeo•eee•, 11. •• • • I'e • • • . • • ,• • • . • . • e • • e • • • • • - . • . . e e e • • •.• e • • • • • • • . • • •_• • • • . ` tl G Mti1 tir �r -sir r jo la s r m 5. lNE tie . n iiiR-3I 1 D a I SR ( UMtY �"EssEs y sip. XowSycgv st Aprr. I 5.F. a�5. I Lit 3 1 I I I I iit t8i iiz s.a. us. 1 1 1 I t . . 1 rioNEy Dew UI 5.R . Sf. 0 A4pAgrNENfII s ii.,JJ men ll .4H, ELI m• 4 N•E• iiri' sr. ,� I s.� S.F. ; Eua G. zoo • • SCALE 1 =t00 i. .i::' tioJtor pre ow LOVE1E% rib ?oWt6t- ,,ZANE No• R-eel-76 f' ROUTE SCHEDULE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED /J !�' 70 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE 1--ovtsS Icy, MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION /j 04 AND RETURN .TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE /() 2_ 7C SIGNATURE OR INIT DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE BUILDING /() - RAFFIC ENG . h -2Z.- 7� ENGINEERING i0 -2C • F I : /// /0 5/ HEALTH u REVIEWER 'S CO OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : L' 6/<Ufit,- `,lni !®� l 4.di ZA ':/1,/77ez i; /�i_-clFinf „LI, Uc I7 act/ • 4(4 • d f.rF e4 )/9l'ce s S �ac��s } ! �r / �`� $ /:mac / t"Lr•n%l - PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . : OV 0 THE CITY OF RENTON `iV 'Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 'z ,`" 0 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT p� 0�Q- 235-2550 �TCD SFP�� June 17 , 1977 RE: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA RENTON , WASHINGTON Dear Recipient : This document is the final environmental impact state- ment ( EIS ) for the proposed Central Highlands Plaza Shopping Center rezone and site development. The .review period for the draft statement expired on May 25 , 1977 . The final EIS is written in the form of appendixes to the draft statetment. It is necessary to have both volumes for a complete document. Review of the draft statement by interested agencies and persons has been appreciated by this department. Thank you for the information provided through your responses . . Very ruly yours , i,o, / I 2. --- N.......- • rdon Ericksen " lanni i Director GYE : MLS :wr • i pF R4 � • puR 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING _.200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 __� O ' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR .• PLANNING DEPARTMENT O q- 235-2550 4teb SEP. `4*' • • MEMORANDUM • June 16 , 1977 TO : Warren Gonnason , Public Works Director FROM: Michael L . Smith , Associate Planner RE : LOVELESS/POWELL REZONE , NO. R-899-76 . As per our discussion of June 16 , 1977 , we would appre- ciate further clarification from your Utilities Division regarding the sewer capabilities for the combined B-1 and - R-2 rezone request. This will be incorporated into the staff report to the Land Use Hearing Examiner. We also understand from you that rights-of-way dedication as proposed are acceptable and that storm drainage plans will provide suitable storm water retention and pollution separation facilities . MLS :wr t 4 �1 . ,i. THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR •, PLANNING DEPARTMENT OVA -4')co. QQ 235-2550 DEO SE PI"3) June 14, 1977 • Mr. Dean W. Tibbott Loveless/Powell , Inc. 606 - 110th N . E. , Suite 1051 Bellevue , Washington 98004I RE : FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA Dear Mr. Tibbott : Attached for final typing and preparation is the rough draft of the Final EIS for Central Highlands Plaza . Pur- suant to Section 4-28. 14 , 2: of the City ' s Environmental Ordinance , the applicant shall pay the costs of prepara- tion of an EIS prior to the 'IHearing Examiner decision on - the rezone. Following is a tabulation of the City ' s cost incurred on thetsubject Environmental Impact Statement : Michael Smith , Associate Planner 48 hours @ 8. 48/hr + 137% (overhead rate) = 557 . 64 • Joan Lankford, Assistant Planner 8 hours @ 7 . 80/hr + 37% (overhead rate) = 85 . 49 Total City Costs Incurred: $ 643 . 13 Ple ase make your check for the Environmental Impact State- ment fee of $643. 13 payable Ito City of Renton and submit it to .the City Finance Department prior to the June 28, 1977 , Land Use Hearing Examiner meeting. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . icksen Pla ni irec ichael L . S ith Associate Planner OC 4 �► ,- r_., PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E. • DIRECTOR - z -- - - -- o 0 0 4,."'.;, °' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 206 235-2569 pA (0. �� 04T fO SE Plc' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR June 14, 1977 TO : MICHAEL SMITH Associate Planner FROM: WARREN GONNASON Public Works Director RE : LOVELESS/POWELL REZONE : From G to B-1 #R- 899-76 The appropriate divisions of the Public Works Department have reviewed the . _ above-referenced rezone and have no objections . ( (I? ch R 'N>, aft qk U Jul 14 ;$fl NNiNG ��?Q � pF R - v a, • , 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT v Z BUILDING DIVISION 23�5 -2540 --- " MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. $O. RENTON,WASH. 98055 /A Co' O Q' FO SEP1C-�� June 10, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR . TO: Warren C. Gonnason FROM: Jim Hanson SUBJECT: Loveless & Powell Rezone We have no objection to rezone as proposed. JCH/mp • JUN 14 1917 . INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date June 9, 1977 TO: Warren C. Gonnason FROM: Richard C. Houghton SUBJECT: Loveless & Powell , Southwest Quandrant Duvall and Sunset Per attached file, the developer has met all our requirements and we have no other comments. frI :T(7 I'll RCH:pmp Attachment • (0-'-- -.Th E7vi, .. --•,N., . ...si cr.., cic \\I') Os -. .- ... . ...., L. - ' ......:,-..:.., , t JUN 1 L I igl' C. -...... C-3 Cz, i-. r).: • ) ''''- 110 •• ••`"'"..."'...----- , _...)N .. cz. c, 1 MEMORANDUM TO , Warren Gonnason , Public Works Director DATEJune 1 , 1977 FROM Michael Smith , Associate Planner SUBJECT Loveless/Powell Rezone from G to B-1 #R-899-76 We would appreciate review of the above rezone request by your various divisions (Traffic , Utilities , Engineering , and Building ) with any comments they might have in writing , so that they may be made a part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner . The review period for the draft EIS has expired . We anticipate distribution of the final EIS and subsequent Hearing Examiner Public Hearing on the rezone within the next several weeks . • R `v o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o CHARLES J. DELsAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT (0 .o � 235-2550 TtD Sw-�O May 24, 1977 Dean Tibbott Loveless/Powell , Inc . Suite 105 606 - 110th N . E . Bellevue , WA 98004 Dear Mr. Tibbott: RE : COMMENTS TO DRAFT EIS , CENTRAL HIGHLANDS SHOPPING CENTER Attached are the comments this department has received to date regarding the subject Draft EIS . As we previously had explained , it was our intent to do as thorough a job as possible on the__draft_ sta_t_ement ,_._so__as_to -e-li-minate or sub- stantially reduce possible adverse comments and as a result expedited the entire process . It is also important as a protection from any future negative action against the proposal that may occur. It is hoped that by retaining a qualified. professional firm to alleviate the inadequacies expressed in the comments , a suitable Final Environmental Impact Statement can be prepared in a relatively short time. If mutually agreeable , we suggest you contact the firm of Wilsey and Ham, Inc . , Mr. Ron Ubaghs , urban/regional planner, at 248-2470. If you have any prefer- ence for a particular professional consultant, we would appre- ciate your suggestion . We will send copies of any additional comments we receive to you . If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to contact this department. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen P1ar�jnin2/ Dir ctor chael L . Smi h Associate Planner MLS :wr Enclosures • •r A • (;:,.14.,•,:-j 4::',. �,� .. municipality of metropolitan seattle May 20 , 1977• CHAIRMAN I��`� � ��\\ C.CAREY DONWORTM / r .` REC�I I ED O %%LOUR': Mr. Michael L. Smith I �/ 2ji 'i STANLEY P.KERSEY Renton Planning Department MAY 25 1977 i.ELLE L:: 200 Mill Avenue • ,4 NANCY RISING Renton, Washington 98055 """" t'„ M.F.(MEL)VANIK ' 4. KEr' Dear Mr. Smith: �'NG is, .:S.." ." ISABEL HOGAN ` I RKLANI Draft Environmental Impact Statement ROBERT L. NEIR Central Highlands Plaza AUBREY DAVIS,JR. Metro staff has reviewed the water quality and public ' " -- transportation aspects of this proposal . SELWYN L. (Buo) YOUNG The proposed storm water runoff controls appear to be - water quality. These controls are also consistent with WES UHLMAN the policy recommendations for runoff rate control in GEORGE BENSON TIMHILL the report, Environmental Management for the Metropolitan PAUL KRAABEL Area--Part II Urban Drainage. PHYLLIS LAMPHERE , WAYNE D.LARKIN JOHN R.MILLER Effective July 9 , 1977 , the present Metro bus service to RANDY REVELLE SAM SMITH Union Avenue will be expanded to run every 20 minutes JEANETTE WILLIAMS during morning and evening peak hours with hourly service during the remainder of the, day. Tentative plans have EDWARD WATTON been formulated to extend service along N.E. Sunset Boulevard during peak hours within two years . JOHN D.SPELLMAN PAUL BARDEN . RUBY CHow Thank' you for this opportunity to review and comment. ROBERT B.DUNN R. R. (Boe) GREIVE ' MIKE LOWRY • Very truly yours , DAVE MOONEY TRACY J.OWEN BILL REAMS , /S--- NL.- BERNICESTERN II , ��l/ .� F`M/,,, Peter S. Machno, Manager NAOMIE BULLOCH Environmental Planning RELLA FOLEY Division JOHN FOURNIER,JR. PAUL NANASSY,JR. • JIM SHAHAN A.DEAN WORTHINGTON PSM•ksa _ . N ISI h:iC?J HANFORD B.CHOATE t a EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RICHARD S.PAGE e. �..-;,..:..:m,:ra'^ '.' 'ni"I•,•;.;r"r,"-...r:.•(.krvr,rr—l.;.''..s.......:1� .. } ti'�i e- } — _ .. _ _ .:1 ... i.ru- ..:r Y:.._ ...FI=t "c};-i.r.:..�ti•.,-.M1:�,i,:�'�l;F:_ ...:f- ._ - ._..." i"."... i,17:M1:. U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , JENCY J�\1Eo szli- REGION X s 2� arilik >v 1200 SIXTH AVENUE • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 o if,n Q _ ��4/Tq(PROSGOREPLY T ATTN OFO:: M/S 623 , 7.- O pn r-ii/E) 'o\ MAY 2 0 j977 it MAY ay ll ,'� iiiA 2 3 197i Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen `r Planning Director p2 4 The City of Renton ` 'i 'S Municipal Building �5 DEPP?' • 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Ericksen: We have completed reviewing your draft environmental impact statement = on the proposed Central Highlands Plaza and we would like to submit • the following comments. Measurements of the ambient noise levels should be included in the draft statement. This information should state the increase in noise the neighboring residences will receive from the new shopping center. Will the residences being built behind the new shopping area receive any adverse noise from operations at the stores and nursery? Time of construction should be limited to normal working hours in order to create minimum noise impact on nearby residences. We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this draft environmental impact statement. Sincerely, Alexandra B. Smith r Director ., ;..,,' Office of Federal Affairs ;a T1)'p STATE OF OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 14. WASHINGTON —.° r 400 Capitol Center Building,Olympia,Washington 98504 .,o '0" Dixy Lee Ray Governor May 18, 1977 Michael L. Smith Renton Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 • Dear Mr. Smith: Re: Draft EIS, Central Highlands Plaza rezone and development The above mentioned draft was apparently developed by the proponent, Loveless/Powell, and addresses two separate actions; the rezone of 11 acres of land, which is justified on the basis of a previous amendment to the comprehensive plan; and the development of a shopping center, which would seemingly be consistent with a commercial zoning designation. The compatibility of the proposed shopping center with the city's--growth policies, as expressed—in-the comprehensive plan and interpreted by the zoning ordinance, is of course a local determination and we have no comments or advice to provide. As far as the adequacy of the draft EIS is concerned, we felt that it was somewhat superficial, if not inadequate, in addressing the impacts of the shopping center on adjacent residential neighborhoods and the conuliunity as a whole. If you have any comments on the above, please call me in Olympia at 753-2222. Sinc yours, Joseph E. LaTourrette Local Government Services JEL:vb --_ • MAY 19 1977 t NG pE��. . ton State meh �j`v .`. Dixy Lee Ray - Governor • W. A. Bulley - Director .. Highway Administration Building .'1144:_ Olympia. Washington 98504 (2063 753-6005 ilef" ment Of'.Highways May 18, 1977 s`/ 'i Eb ',1 MAY 19 1977 .a� Mr. Michael L. Smith Renton Planning Department 4�?� 200 Mill Avenue 'SO:* 9- Renton, Washington 98055 �� DE•1? City of Renton Renton Central Highlands Plaza . Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Smith: We have reviewed the subject statement and following are our suggested comments: The statement should include information on the number of vehicle trips per day and design hour trips for the reviewer to judge impact of the proposal upon the existing .or proposed street system. The statement that SR 900 (Sunset Blvd.) and Duvall (138th) will have traffic capacities of 40,000 per day is very optimistic. If this should be true, the Department would be anxious to review supporting data so that we may plan to accommodate these volumes at other locations on SR 900. It is our opinion that the proposal will affect the traffic cap- acity of local roads and streets but insufficient data is presented to judge the impact and the severity of the impact. Thank you for the opportunity to review this information. Sincerely, RUSSELL ALBERT Assistant Director for Planning and Research By: WM. P. ALBOHN Environmental Planner RA:ds WPA/WBH • cc: Bogart Ashford • <M +`fir - .- _s;, -%1 'f 410 West Harrison Street,P.O.Box 9863 (206)344-7330 "'' h4,f' Seattle,Washington 98109 nr- � �,i t d May 17, 1977 p,',1:' ,2.'',"-:,P.,,OM:.;1-[.4Q:.f. ,',1 Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen f.. Planning Director bi• clg.\\ih o� City of Renton tic.) Municipal Building ( 19 1911 ) 200 Mill Avenue South ,r, Renton, Washington 98055 et` Subject: Central Highlands Plaza A,/IVG ®Eev,, Dear Mr. Ericksen: We have reviewed the Draft Environmental. Impact Statement for the rezone and development of the Central Highlands Plaza, to be located at the southwest corner of Sunset and Duvall . Our comments are related to the air quality aspects of the statement and project. We believe that the air quality coverage in the statement is not adequate, particularly for a project of this scope since it is not mentioned. It is one of the listed items in the elements of the physical environment (Exhi- bit "P"). We note that the shopping center will provide 495 parking spaces. Under the present indirect carbon monoxide source standard of this Agency, the sponsor will be required to apply for an Indirect Source Order of Approval to this Agency, prior to the commencement of construction at the site. Information on that program can be obtained by contacting either Mr. Ander- son or Mr. Pearson at 344-7334. Very truly yours, ' A. R. Dammkoehler SERVING: Air Pollution Control Officer KING COUNTY 410 West Harrison St. P.O.Box 9863 Seattle,98109 (206)eattle 4-7330 11 B : ames . earson KITDial Op COUNTY Senior Air Pollution Engineer Dial Operator for Toll Free Number Zenith 8385 Bainbridge Island,98110 fh - Dial 344-7330 PIERCE COUNTY 213 Hess Building Tacoma,98402 (206)383-5851 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 506 Medical-Dental Bldg. Everett,98201 1206)259-0288 • BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN: Gene Lobe,Commissioner Kitsap County; VICE CHAIRMAN: Gordon N.Johnston,Mayor Tacoma; Robert C.Anderson,Mayor Everett-, Patrick J.Gallagher,Commissioner Pierce County; James B.Haines,Commissioner Snohomish County; Glenn K.Jarstad,Mayor Bremerton; Harvey S.Poll,Member at Large; John D.Spellman,King County Executive; Wes Uhlman,Mayor Seattle; A.R.Dammkoehler,Air Pollution Control Officer. RE/V May 17, 1977 ,,;;-� Ff1 \`IEb 4O Renton Planning Department MAY 19 1977 Stcteor City of Renton x. e\ic,s;-mic;,(),-: Municipal Building ___ ____....- ----• 200 Mill Avenue South -9 of EcOio2:. Renton, WA 98055 ti pAR E „Tf tiG Attention: Michael L. Smith DES °Itr " Subject: Central Highlands Plaza -- Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Smith: As you requested we have reviewed this draft environmental impact statement. Although we have no permit jurisdiction, the following comments are offered in the hope that they will be useful to you as you prepare your final impact statement. 1 - From reading the impact statement, it is not clear what the "significant adverse impacts" are that caused the City of Renton to declare an impact statement necessary. An impact statement is only required when there are significant adverse —impacts-which-the applicant is-incapable or unwilling to - - mitigate. These significant adverse impacts should be high- lighted in the EIS. 2 - In the introduction, the rezone should be listed as a required license. 3. The alternatives are quite lightly treated. The purpose of an EIS is to assess and weigh alternatives. You may wish to refer to the SEPA guidelines (WAC 197-10-440)(12) for guidance. Since this is a rezone, alternative sites need not be restricted to those controlled by the applicant. 4 - Our Northwest Regional Office in Redmond is available for consultation and assistance on storm-water disposal matters. As plans are developed you or the applicant may wish to contact Mr. Mark Premo at 885-1900. I hope that these brief comments will be useful to you. Please do not hesitate to contact me (206-753-6891 ) if you wish to discuss these matters further. Sincerely, _ T. L. Elwell Environmental Review TLE:bjw cc: Mark Premo � OF J „ CO0 THE CITY OF RENTON ZMUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 2 hill. o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT.07 0 0�� 235-2550 gTEO S E P1 � MEMORANDUM May 11 , 1977 TO : W. Gonnason , Public Works Director G. Coulon , Director of Parks and Recreation R. Geissler, Acting Fire Chief H. Darby, Police Chief • FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director RE : CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA DRAFT EIS Attached for your review is a copy of the above men- tioned draft environmental impact statement . Your submittal of any comments you wish regarding this k, draft statement by May 25 , 1977 , would be appreciated . • GYE: MLS :wr C N Attachment of 4".• �i Q o THE CITY OF RENT ON ON c MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 mILO CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ODD �� 235-2550 grfO SEP1 - MEMORANDUM May 11 , 1977 TO: C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor George Perry , Council President Members of the City Council FROM: Gordon Y . Ericksen , Planning Director RE : CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAZA DRAFT EIS The Planning Department has distributed the draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for the proposed rezone and development of the Central Highlands Plaza Shopping Center located at Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N . E. The State Environmental Policy Act and City of Renton Environmental Ordinance establishes a thirty-five day review period in which to receive comments from other agencies and interested parties . Additional copies are available in the Planning Department , if yo'u desire specific review. GYE : MLS :wr ,C Cve//es s F �o(i 7i • I Renton City Council 12/20/76 Page 3 Correspondence and Current Business - Continued * Comprehensive "' Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported Planning Commission Plan Review review of the Comprehensive Plan for the N.E. Sunset Blvd. and Duval Ave N. E. Sunset Blvd N. E./138th S. E. area presently indicated as commercial , multi-family at Duval N.E. residential and single family residential . The letter noted request to provide expansion of the commercial area at th.e southwest corner of C.E. Loveless & the intersection to permit development of a small shopping center. L.W. Powell Two public hearings and committee meetings noted. The Commission recom- Requested mended that the commercial designations as shown on Comprehensive Plan Amendment be expanded to meet needs of development of area as shown on maps. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL SET DATE OF FEBRUARY 7, 1977 FOR PUBLIC HEARING AND REFER ANY CORRESPONDENCE TO THAT HEARING. MOTION CARRIED. (See later comment. ) Rezone Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported Planning Commission Glen Norwood recommendation for approval of rezone from G to B-1 for property located N.30th & Park N. at 1302 N. 30th St. at the corner of N. 30th and Park Ave. N. , requested by Glen Norwood. The letter noted existing use of vacant service station with proposed use of office and experimental design shop. The letter noted two public hearings;and noted filing of restrictive covenants re uses allowed, limitations on access , landscaping, etc. and agreement to participate in an LID for Off-site improvements, being in agreement with Comprehensive Plan. Moved by Perry, Seconded by Shinpoch, Council concur in recommendation and refer matter to the Legislation Committee. and Motion was withdrawn by Councilman- Perry upon determination of the area. Moved by Perry, Seconded by Stredicke, this matter be referred to the Planning and Development Committee for recommendation. ' SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, REFER THE NORWOOD REZONE MATTER TO THE COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 14, TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA. CARRIED. A Motion was made by Stredicke, seconded by Bruce that the subject of th Comprehensive Plan review for the N. 30th & Park N. area , along with the Norwood Rezone be referred to the Planning and Development Committee for review and recommendation. (Motion later withdrawn. ) Substitute motion was proposed by Clymer to grant the applicant the rezone. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:12 p.m. and all Council persons were present, as previously shown, at Roll Call . Council President Stredicke withdrew previous motion with consent of Second. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, MATTER OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW FOR KENNYDALE AREA BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND THE REPORT BE HELD FOR PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Proposed motion by Clymer to grant rezone failed to receive a second. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE THAT THE SUBJECT OF THE NORWOOD REZONE BE REFERRED TO THE PLAN- NING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND REPORT BACK. CARRIED. Hearing Date MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CHANGE THE DATE OF PUBLIC Changed HEARING ON REVIEW OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE RIPLEY LANE AREA TO FEBRUARY 7, 1977. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Mr. Dean Tibbott, 17003 N. E. 28th, Bellevue, inquired re Loveless and Powell request for Comprehensive Plan amendment to property located at the southwest corner of Sunset Highway and 138th Ave. S.E. , and asked for earliest possible review by Council . Councilman Stredicke noted hearing set for February 7, 1977. Rezone Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported Planning Commission Value Village recommendation that the City Council approve rezone as requested by Russell L. Leach for Value Village from R-2 to B-1 with restrictive Property located Covenants as agreed by the applicant providing for screening, landscaping, on Bronson Way signing, etc. , being in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. The prop- Between Garden N erty is approximately 18,750 sq.ft. located at Bronson Way N. between and Park Ave N. Garden N. and Park N. presently zoned multi-family residential , with the proposed use of Commercial . MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THE REZONE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT_COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION AT NEXT MEETING. CARRIED. y Renton City Council 12/20/76 Page 4 Correspondence and Current Business Continued Rezone Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported Planning Commission The Austin Co. recommendation for approval of rezone for the Austin Company from GS-1 to M-P for 2. 7 acres located on SW 16th St. between Powell Ave. SW and Thomas Ave. SW. for proposed office and warehouse, being in agreement with Comprehensive Plan. Letter from the Austin Company, C.R Wing, V-P and District Manager, filed appeal of the rezone to M-P rather than L-1 listing six reasons L-1 would be more economical and aesthetically desirable. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL SET DATE OF FEBRUARY 7, 1977 FOR MATTER OF HEARING ON APPEAL. Mr. Russ Brown, 7746 Overlake Dr. , Bellevue, representing The Austin Company, asked Council to set hearing for earliest possible date. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, SUBSTITUTE MOTION, SET DATE OF JANUARY 24i 1977 FOR HEARING AND REFER CORRESPONDENCE TO THAT HEARING. SUBSIIIUIE MOI1UN CARRILU. Exception to Letter from Planning Director Ericksen reported Planning Commission Subdivision recommendation to grant an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance (Ord. Ordinance No. 3062 of 9/13/76) as requested by Emmett Kindle for property located Emmett Kindle in the vicinity of 2625 Jones Ave NE zoned G-7200 for use as single family residential . The letter explained the request to allow the use of pipestem lots exceeding the 150 ft. maximum depth allowed by. 20 feet in order to allow reasonable development of the property and recommended granting of request. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE; COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. CARRIED. May Creek Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason presented proposed amendment Interceptor to the agreement with Water District 107 and Metro to provide for a change in the method of reimbursement and providing for a new estimate of the total amount of City participation. The letter explained the original agreement was dated 1/16/75 and since that time the consultant and the District have had to provide all the preliminary engineering financing for the development of the facilities plan. Further. noting this agreement provides that the City would advance its share of the funds as the engineering work and construction progress, noting increase in scope of work. The letter estimated the total City cost will be approxi- mately $124,000 representing the City' s 10% share of the interceptor project. The letter recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute this agreement, which has been approved by the City Attorney, and noted it is proposed to utilize the funding available from the 1975 Water & Sewer Bond Fund. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT. Following considerable discussion, the Motion CARRIED. Solid Waste Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason brought attention to the solid waste collection contract with General Disposal which expires 5/1/77, noting a recently enacted state law enables the City to negotiate with the contractor for an extension of the agreement on a negotiated basis for a period of up to five years. The Public Works Director' s letter explained meeting between staff of Public Works and Finance Departments and General Disposal in 11/76 at which time General Disposal requested negotiations be conducted in such a manner that when an agree- ment reached, a contract would be forthcoming; that in the event no agree- ment could be reached, their price quotations would remain confidential in order not to be at a disadvantage in the open competitive bid call . . The Public Works Director's letter suggested a negotiation committee consisting of the Chairman of the City Council ' s Finance and Personnel Committee, Chairman of the Public Works Committee, the Mayor, Finance Director and the Public Works Director, with the power to bind the City. The letter noted negotiationsshould be consummated prior to 2/1/77 to allow sufficient time for a competitive bidding process, if required. • Moved by Clymer, Seconded by Shinpoch, Council refer the matter to the Legislation Committee. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL REFER THE SOLID WASTE CONTRACT MATTER TO THE FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE TO REVIEW AND REPORT TO THE NEXT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE,(anticipating an executive session next Monday night.) CARRIED. . . •\ • • • ct., ) ( 9/.61: r Ao, • qejp se* • • t f;LT.-1: 0L (.4 uL 01:17 _LOTSji."-;T 01; UT 0.1:1 1;1,10 ;U13:1 ;01.1. OD 021 &CILaoO 0-LTECZ.0 p 0;1 E2, C,I1.11":,-31:1 ML; 01.0.L0 0 "L'EGirlOir•-•:-..,28-TaLOri .31:1 - co: ;JO•_7,0 .T.1.1. S.: .--00_ O ZE4U@D oLo G...f; ;0 GL0 LITL0i-1 Or: "4:1-.3.01..7.:.2.C;LOAD cOUT.1 1.10;;Q=J2-3 ;0 0-LO.!:_se p 0r; C 15.0 Od.3e.ie tceE,T2 , 00S30Eerl.Ors °E °fl • p2221.L3oTp U°30S 00 oJio o.rr Loqc1- POLO oq • U13:J07 • • • (c: 0;1':3 2-.T1 ;0 b0J °: uopueI.L. :eL • u -,•,= T.T.111. • • ipj,.Or4.:110 • saLV ,• ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park . Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) M+c i4A J . 61-f in r1 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : L_oyrLAss , PryLu-Ll_. Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r)" C G— Comments : 11 < c Si gnaturee Di rector or Authori zed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : z=7;. --- Comments • . ci- A. /00o-«/S a f /d„,7' 61e4iiy /p-t c _ �t>' � I�e3GY�� , �.7'�oLY--4w A 5Gt A s t.�soru r'.��' '� � ��nn e..�c� S . . ea4-9 J4:45v.1s t=Ll�• �f '7L+. tlo-fic A_ 4 /f+G/�fr�S' /...1 r/S• G>'�s qin n7-e- •• S. .�,/4-sc•..•a_1 /4. 4 e • �� zr�ti �. .�• ��.a- /o/zv/7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 (OVER) RE.. VIEW BY OTHER CITY D PARTMENTS : Department :_ U11h4 s is Comments . `;;y.,. r. s c.uJr"' ►vtc,,;4 A`,a, (. (,)4,° / ,,h c� �14 ('c, ,mac n. C a.^ o s a, Frieot r7dv, -cCVor.nu,ida Rheesgi- 67- Bert/S'7 JAI Signature of Director or Authorized Representative / 9 Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : • Comments : • • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : • • Comments : • • • • • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative • Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : • • Comments : • • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • • OF R •,� THE CITY OF RENTON ....IR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 . CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 �Q- � 235-2550 • �Tf O o SEPj-� December 29 , 1976 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Stredicke, Council President • FROM: Gary R. Kruger, Senior Planner RE: COMMERCIAL ZONING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION ALONG N.E. SUNSET BOULEVARD In response to your request, there are approximately 80 acres (including streets) along N.E. Sunset Boulevard west of Harrington Avenue N.E. to east of Union Avenue N.E. as is illustrated on the attached map. There is no commercial zoning at the intersection of Sunset and Duvall Avenue N.E. The Highlands Shopping area has about 68 acres of B-1 zoning while the Union Avenue N.E. intersection has approximately 12 acres. The existing land use element of the Comprehensive Plan has about 81 acres (including streets) along Sunset Boulevard west of Harrington Avenue N.E. to east of Duvall. The High- lands Shopping area has 50 acres; Union Avenue, 16 acres; and Duvall, 15 acres. The Loveless-Powell Comprehensive Plan amendment as recommended by the PlanningCornmission would add aboutf_i_ve acres of com- mercial designation to the intersection for a total of approxi- mately 20 acres. This would increase the total to 86 acres in the study area. However, it must be pointed out that there is also a rearrangement of commercial designation plus buffers at this intersection to more realistically reflect property lines and topography that the existing plan does . GRK:ms Attachments • • . . •• - •• - "'-: -' ------'- -• ft • ; . - - r!';:ltr„ . .4D7 \ \.‘ \ic•vn'. I , . a i .1,.., : ,r107 •Sr ,NI ll 11. ST_ 'I •\t '1 ..... ;:?.:1:13 ....(i. e..T.,...:,t, 1 •••f7c.i"'.." 'a. \ , I d , , K . ..•.! , ,..•.,k...k.• ,.• \i,.' -. .. 'N., • ' . 1"..1-' .----9' i. % • 1 ••• •• • • • • • ' • l' .., .... ._._ _. . . ,- ....____, ii .... • RIM 3 .. ,1 •• •• •• • •• • ... . ..R.. 2". , , • •• : .H, : ::. , .1. . , . , . , , ..., eigi ., ,: ... . , , •,,, ,... 1 , , •••••• •• .....••• 4a : il,.i_s_1:4•1i1 1 .4 ''‘ '1 i• *Mr' •-11 1 11-'1 111 : l• " ....... .... •1'• r13-3 ..._ pin_.__.-- -,..,..; , . • „ ,. ,, ...ja:Jo , ,. . , . ::::::::::::::::::::•. 10111 . • , „ • •.,••.m..• '..:::i:F.:....:S...0001 I- , a .,..or r .I,fin . i'" ' - li-2 I°L."___ __...-,-3 - ,,.. 0-1?-2- .. . . , ,....„. , , 71.__•.... _ 1 :. . ::::::::" . . 1 9 ..- .. i 16:10' 7-7-- - 4,t7 .-P --1.---, 4 . • 1 , . I , 1-- • • 1. CI t•- • I •i"-' ; 1 i 1 ' •rt • '. re1Mi1. • . - 7 41.4, i .. 7 1.0 11 I_1 A 1 ....4, • 4 Ll 9 A "' 1-, :•-!. ; 11 1 11_ a j...:! iv,, 1 ..: • :: ,s al , IS ...IIIM=1 rm • • f .111, • - .-: s'T - __ _._._.__ _ _ . _ .. -...4111111P_ - ' '4111.• I: '1,. n r-„-„ /a:. .2,j ' R...3 <n , • -1 ,k ' 11_ !--, : ' • ' -111'ri ' ' 1 i: . E lo%• ' I 'i mann' a iir ''4111 .1 i'i•I'1.2.1..! ....L. 1 - ,i1.61. ...iti • . , •- N E 101.P • 4 si • . . -1334....,,•••,4 „, 3 ail1 I. ... .i"13 ' • i. II C ! I ; ' .• •1 .7irtrim.' , ,1.<- ...,-..„..\:.±..,EtiLif.,, • 5 l• , a .' ICS & ,IE. 5 • a 1 •,... 3 ,. i ii131,,3T, ,_),., ,, • GL. il ' "1'C '" 1 5 f•• ;.-- •J''• N.E-ky.' ul el A , . • • 414 .- --• 55 . 04 . .• ril 41 , _i 1 Hq_K,„ i 1 ..-1;1 a ' t4tL it '-a I' s % uffir 9 1 ..ts • . . N 4 • I N ,4 ;..• it; . " i, ; ,., -,E: -:.• !, ,,, • •-•-•, - : • % -- '10101.713 : • . .: - 4 ' '7-"\-•il. :I'• • 1'-,---CN -P?"1 . I ,, ii.,... ' ,o-',,S3 4. III. • -:, - 1.1,..... , . a. • •/- ' /4 i AWAIKI ....., L. . 11, 1 . ' \ p- ,,, • , , - ..,,,,, ., r 1-1 .f. A', Ve ti'zir-..i 10.• ?, , , z '5 A 5 C.,. 5 ste.,;• 9110,14 , .. ,, Ar/ 'r'• •• " ' 6 11: , .la .• . 1 -.ix, -'''''''''' 1 f • ' 1,4 1.1.A A,.. 5 11 ....... -,i,'• I 13, 14 4 .111E4231111111.". 1211 9 a' .',..:L. I.1 f ,,,i, 35 dDf.7:dir 4P r# 4 ,._i'pl., .. 4-.01 , . , _.... .......1_, tis,AQr.1T. . 1 , 9 it I I, .1--IN • 51/1/111 .1- -a Illir I./I-L.11. .1 ; 11-;i • 1 35 .•4.,.• , , ,.., !,.....ifs,. Ili -1 • •C' ".. A;_-_,L.: ' '1"1:'Z • ; 1 Z ':: 4• • -,"1/ !....1: • .r.. .. M E. 10 911 ST. 1-1° • i 0 . r I.re 1 i,I, ,F7.77;i17-lit .. 1 _• __.1_*_' Z 1.11-•-•MX ', N , ,•, , •,=7 - f c, .1,, ..._ . '-' , " ''- rtfl',4J1 I[Li 1 '''fR°\a- .1..i.4.41.1.,±: .,,-.,.... ....,... ,-2- t, . l•-t-4/7-+14 „ . 1 1 . ,. . i I •. t z -lir i ...,/,"Y`l% 1 i 0 • I . .. , I .. T-7 t f 1.1 TT 7 1 i. f:.,'''' 1;1 -la, --:- it•-•1' -' ' • • 'I' ' I 1,L1 '1:I 3 • . _ JI2 i .0••••:-11 101/ *.S1 iI , '1 .6 A;'-- , 1 _.• .It.. • "R 1 i 'a, -t lc 1 cr, . . ,...... • e!„, , ,0 .i t;'!. i •--7 ':''• q • - 1 •.4..'''• Alir ' .'.7-1. -'1-1.-- ' 4 1.1 ittrdl-----",:• •_.{....., ',.- ,,,.., •::,< I ., . ; ; :: ..1 ., . . I., , , . .,, JR-I I, •. t 1 ,.. . ... .4 1 • x, 1 • 1 " longs . ...--7. ,•• • & , .1.4.:...i: .: a......4- rf...... ::4'.-', ! !'i,, ••,.'',.:. .,..,)-.! ! - .1,.--f -; .; -- '''" b ST . • , I ••i••-.1,' • • CIIY OF RENT(.', , PLANNING DEPARTik.',Li- i* r.., CITY !iAiL RENTON. W."-.'HIrdiV,r: ., • 1 • I. i I • • -•Y fir -c_ C • = a �- - •3-1�(S1 S`lel£.,lc .. • 1 . r ' .,RP\ ca1.99o,,,.'5 e� rg• -- .3°1 - I FIGURE I c P /_ 03 6�a !3E • I EXISTING j ' 6 �gs;.B.Jo- -9z: '7z . �5 43z \\3A — !----- COMPREHENSIVE j ,P._n:� \'3 ` , t 33 - ' I PLANI. �� 176I75 Q 4F 32 31 • _ -� ! I 7n`7P /8r f' r co NI dal rn '_SI /iSt.',%71.S.131.4:9-414s 414> i . • ., : Mei rpmAnn 1 _ 1 l I 1 I iS'6 '8,91• 10' 1112I13I1411S'16 1TI1g` 5 145.� 3 I I J--- I :f.• •:f• yy .LLL'•Yr , 7�'• is �;::y.•• •: : `'t7 fi Rt17 t;,( " , . �y* tr� 4 `..gyp .t T '� 1/ ; -:‘--.5 3. ,1,.'...1.,„„,1,4 4r,....,....,c y{ -:::::.::••:.....:..:..;.•.:.....:_.:•..:.:•.:..::..:•.:.. :.::.: .....-:i. ) Y• : :: - • /// 1 f !Y ..,.,„,....x4..:...-:..„4...,.............-....-..,...„2,....-,,.....,7..,..-.,.:7....„.,.,,,--.:...‘....;:...;:...:;-.:..::::.::•.:.::.:.:.:..,:..::%•.i..::.:::•.:•„::.::•::.::::.:::.:.•::.::::..•::::::..•i:•::::.:.::•.:.::.:•:.•.::::.::•.•::.:•:::•::..::::.::.•.:::::::•::•.:::::.:•.:•:-.•:::.:•.:::-„•::x.::::.•:::..::::-.•:•:.:.::::.•E•:-.::::-:.:•-:.:- .,.,,/...,./. , 1. .,„-,4,,,..„,..„..„..„:„.....„..,...„.„:„..„..:...... .::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::„ .. . . „ • „....„,,..„...„.„..,......,,,:r......„.., „:.::::::.:.:.::::.:.:.:.::::::.:.:.:.:.:„ ,,..,, . ,4 -,,,,,,A._.....,..,..,.....:„..3p..,-...,..,:„.„:,:,...,,„, ..:.:.:.•••••:•:.:...-:-:-:.:.-...-:.:•:::-- , '..„-....:-..„,„•,;„...„....„..,4„:,......„........„............ ....::::.:.::::::::.::::::::::.::„ i L.1 . , . Ei .rY:A/r:,::.+X+.4.-:44 .viY M1 'CAr: Y•. iI p — ___--J - . / " / / � I - HA 5R /1 7 ��.` / / HIGH SCHOOL ` , 1;,.�\. ,. _ .3�; I 2 3 :4.5 !6 7 . -- ----I % / / ''\ J• � I ? Al . , !:7:141.0.Si i44 S.5 34 33 !2.1gt... . I -• • I/ i / •' / .., IY _ i Saw Ip p� '� I " / ' _ ,,r_mo Sr( i ' •;• : T-T\0 , i 3 i / , / I' i 1 L L _ J, �'- -_ 1_ 1`ar a� a� .. .-) 1 51N6d- fAMIbY — zs ;:1 MVDINM DL`NSI'1Y Muff! FAMI{.Y CITY OF RENTON _-/IMME Rl 1AL PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ E` "_,,r„ — QGly;Gti l T :A}r,,. • • r -mot '� ` '.V 'c �C-`c4y° y •• I'O��[.qf e;11)E 7 .70 I 1 • —1 --�-J 1 �_3i` �-� • iag I /••'�� sF.`s .Sga f. �. FI GURE c Nor 185I8Cr 'N ++' , , �4 RECUMMENDtE. 33 1'4 74 z I COMPREHEil� i FIAT i 176I7S V �i3 4f 31 I 1 1 • 7. 7E — PLAN a. L�� 84II �'' Sv!S�•G1339%ac... .. 4&114>�OQ® 9 __. :� =s :;;s;;:;::>::'.• :::. la3182 j I5%1S4i53{-5.2 p`��lkillM • — I; ITT 17 T N _> ��(� )5 6(n :#� .l • i' 4 i I ST s {o�T,JP 1. I ' IZ .3 : 7 6 718 9•,0'11112 1;114115:1611711 5 1 4 I • I 1 ay � a , z , w am b- :E� '' a• :j: d.F/e' •. I.•Gyt. 1'. I C •' �-t *: h':S •q w,'Z L 'Vt'.-} 13 ✓.i-.i to J• :: ti )fi 3;•::E i .. .•wry'-`.'::' ••P ' 'fir' 1 L {• :•� y !•L t- s,• ✓ i y r x / �� e t 1..0 • I ' / J.`. . ,wi 4 r4w..,i+I��e„,,,,,t-. t• ~ r / ti .. t 1 w 1 • .n. ,. �, �"tr S'r C .. N • `r`# �..ti I ter/ .. ,•_ -.-'--: •�'.'. :tiv, r-,•••.h!i:i!i}yrdH:i:kiii;+. :f i^`�• 1—Eci* / . • 0 1 H 1 - T_TVT 1 f HAZEN SR . _ z -- I / HIGH SCHOC._ 8 �" '-'� ' 1 2 3 .4 5 ,G /! / / � , �� 8 / // / .3�.,/ G i .p -r9.. IF 19 20,25 2`/. - It ' / • 1 '1 1.:W 1•4 s7 34 3_ 22 0�1'•y ' •CrW w, `i ' / 1 I , -- 1 ,s..•e.• , 'EtI9i,roin a ---- — / / i///' I ;`aJ ,} L J ll Ncii4 FAMILY1 _.:•.a _: „5 A LOW �5N5iTY Multi FAMILY - -- , MEDIUM DEMSI1Y Mul'fl FAMILY Ci7y o= RLN ON FiANNIJN , DEPAAIM ENT CITY `HALL r h s'- GOM�tCRLIAL ;:rr — __ . 4 OF R -v C.) %j Z PLANNING COMMISSION • RENTON, WASHINGTON c MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 • BA 8-3310 9 ysp December 2 , 1976 �97 CAPITAL 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Clark Teegarden, Chairman Land Use Committee Logan Garrison, Member Joan A. Walker, Member RE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN--SUNSET AND DUVALL C. E. Loveless and Lloyd W. Powell requested an expansion of the commercial designation on the land use element of the comprehensive plan in the southwest corner of N.E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E. The existing comprehensive plan is illustrated in Figure 1. The committee recognized that an expansion of commercial in one area could affect the viability of the comprehensive plan in not only the immediate vicinity of the amendment but also in other - areas_ as an excess would promote marginal or non-development in other areas. The nearness of the Highlands shopping area and the commercial designation at Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. and the large amounts of undeveloped commercial designation in the Highlands were recognized. It became evident that the land use element in the Highlands is in need of a thorough review. • However, there is a request to amend the land use element to permit the development of a small shopping center which is scheduled to begin construction in the Spring of 1977 . It was concluded that the present request should be acted upon and further study of the land use element for the northeast quadrant of the city be undertaken. The intersection of Sunset and Duvall appears to be a logical area for commercial growth because, (1) the intersection is where major east-west and north-south arterials meet; (2) new develop- ment is anticipated eastward as basic services become available; and (3) is centrally located in the highlands plateau where multi- family residential development can be anticipated. The basic questions were how much, where and what type of buffers , if any, would be appropriate. I Planning Commission Members Comprehensive Plan--Sunset and Duvall December 2 , 1976 Page Two After field surveys, listening to numerous written and oral inputs, and studying various options , Figure 2 was agreed to be appropriate. The increased . amount of commercial was con- tained to what reasonably could be developed within a few years and recognize natural and man-made barriers and provide buffers to protect single family areas where necessary. RECOMMENDATION: The Land Use Committee recommends that the Planning Commission concur in this report and recommends the proposed revision as presented in Figure 2 to the City Council and the commission give high priority to further review of the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan for the north- east quadrant of the city (Highlands area) . • CT :GRK:ms - Attachments -1rr.-N174 , -' pF R -v THE CITY OF RENTON L ` , MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o� Op 4o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 235-2550 q' D SE PI (11/(N /r)( MEMORANDUM L � September 15 , 1976 '11) '.0: Files FROM: Michael Smith , Associate Planner RE : SHOPPING CENTER - 138TH AND. SUNSET lb\ Joan Lankford and I met today with Steve Puskit and Doug Mulvanny regarding their plans for development of a shopping center at the southwest corner of 138th and Sunset Blvd . N . E . We reviewed the comprehensive plan for this area and commented that the proposal indicated almost twice as much commercial area as the comprehen- sive plan indicates . We indicated that although the plan is a flexible document , the subject proposal went far beyond reasonable interpretation of such flexibility . Therefore , we instructed them ' Ame a usmeu sot f b pereoosd alp 'rsi xte nsrievnnensg,of tm oesritvye. plan We also discussed such matters as environmental impact , land • use impacts of the proposal , and the timeliness of such a proposal . We discussed briefly some of the design , landscaping , and buffer- ing requirements , but felt that this might be premature until the general land use questions were resolved . We gave them the necessary comprehensive plan amendment and rezone application forms , and reviewed the instructions with them. MLS : vb • - - — II I FIG'24E 2 ^No-�• ;'�� .� ems''''',/4�, RECu; I'1Ef�DED rvo,T `�5:8� u � / 34 j , \<.a h4 �33 - i I 1 `�� ,., ._5'.,,c� tis NFC � --„A-.•r��' -��1 o• • 0 PLAN —,8�!n/ ti�r �t3• •4G ,C Z 9,c. �3 Q) 1. • �` �8 y ��.'S� Sa! 9 y,�q 4'�oQ zs Z,• �e9 - - --• 1 `— --. s.:'. :�__ 1. • 33 18� ''S�Ln 531'521 ISo4• 9 ^. ' 1 j •••;;.••: • .• .- -- - I • j 3 :S C 7 8.9.1.s 1 ,1 Z 1 13 i l 4 i i s i b!; i 1 8; 5 4 3 i I + ':ti:•ti•%{::v::v.::::•r,.;%.:•:•:• • Y'• :•v: :::: i .'l ••: :::.:** I ••r rrrr:r:r::r•••r:•:•:Yr.•••' .I: •:::::: •••%:•}v: •{• ' :ili• :•JC.•:• ::}:•:}:{:•:•:•%}:•: %}::•.{:.::5}: L:* :•P:•}%••v'•:4f•:•:rr•r r•:rr•{. : rr r• •: :% • a••4 f r : . • : Iir•v••{•....• •} ••r}ti:•• •:• •{•}••:. }:v: v}':::::::tip:{} }: }}r .; ; ," :v ,, :M;:• 0::} : ?.::!KI:K A:::ti::%•:•%:•:•%:• : •r}:}:%ter: :}rr :%: �� ; ••''• • �� '• • fiy • • ::' .. .-r,--- :{.,. ..., '�?{YKSSS.• .k�o'.• - - - �..�c—��,� -_.tom.. : �- — 1 •/: / / a ' / /" — '' IZ,=A. N SR ; '—Tug_" •— �� • / , 1 J 1 . .., I, • . 3 4- 5 G b i /, / / L., ' n ,,. - - r—�- - '.,3 Z i • r—_-17 1r+ -.. a4 1_ 2210I ... "1-) .. f • :I F/ ' 1 -2 r . 1` PL r _ j -.._.. • / / — • - • _ 'G.• - 'U 9 :10 II y --- ' ! i , 9. • •Q .1 i / ./ / /, I • SIN(1I.E FAMILY • - , - .. _ .. .I .o L a. an • ( :.'. . I LOW V5N5ifY MULTI FAMILY - -- . MEDIUM D5N51'fY MULTI FAMILY • ::: :.:;: GOMMCRLIAL- - 1"'lllA': - - - - --- - - ---- • - - . -1 ‘••• - - . . , . . errs...••r.• I ... . . . •--- ... ... ... _---.:. -•F..% -- —s- • ,...- -- . FFIGURE1 - __-___•_,-;• - . , _ :29 ^ - ' —..--4-•,:'. ' r.7 Q 4-- ,IA. I —/ .- ••- -.... ----......,, .----:----- -... '.-— * ' '- .‘, '7,4 0 7C , •I C.m.7 4 . I --- . :-• .,,- < , • , ‘,. .. , \,:‘'1--'---.•' . .:--(---.1 ' 1 EXISTING \ - -_--• .-_ - ... ., 7 z - •• 3 c, . . ._ -j. 6---—- -- -----II COMPREHENSIVE • .73-- , •,34 ,e,„•,3 3 )--..... I I I i I PLAN • ,__t____-_,___-______. . •74 .-.:..--- ---..,:, -.7, /3-,---/3 t 1 1 1,, I,-,,,:7 5,.7'y co.3 ty...; ef.,, c -1;MI-7-7.--/-..rumi p. , I: -.....-7E : ' : ...,...) ,a,, ,,,ill — - '1 ,'"- 1--,--m-., v, . .4 c. cl — 50\N • . • ,,, 1 82 j ;.-.is4;;3,5/ s.I so, - • . . 23 ZZ 121 .Zo119 • r ' F3•4-µ:.:1it.. . s-\ I 1 , I I S E- 107's PL_ I ' • 7-, !,e. r- • : • . , I ; ' • , •..J -,'-',•G-7 '8 S'iss': i il2ii3'.14116tg 5 3 I 2 1....ii • I -...--.. 2.r....1—.4.—a-.... „ r _istr-forlim-wi-Ifinr-mr' • • ::7.::::::::://:**::A:P:i."4... I ••:ii::::•:.:11-:.:11:1/Fi.4SZ:Z..41/:".::;. • 1 i , . . 1; ______.-----------• • • 1 • • • ----,.., ••,, I I . • • ••, ' :Sigi*:.:14WPAIPPP::::::PP.:::41'4PAp*:0:4P,AVSV:S$ZW:M:471.7A,P 7. • '..:-:÷:.:"-:.:::.:.::' -'%':::::::::::::::.:.:.:::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::..::::::::::::.:::::::::.1%:. ':V44.•:::•••••-"P:I:4 4.P.:$71::::::.1.1:14::::PPPM.::44%41:4:::.••:•••:*'7:7••••P',7 I ..N , • r.:;:.:.:1::::1:::::::•:::::.::::..:'::1:'::::.:.::::.:•::..f::::::::::::::::.:::':::::::':::'::::::.:.::::.::::.:::-::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::::.:::.::.:::.:::.:•::'::::.::t:.:.:.;:.,::.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.::.:.:.::::::::!:::1:::::.?. 7**.:44:14•:,•:.'47:64e: .......„:.......:.:........:;......:.:.:.::.:.:.:.::::.:.:.::::::.:.::::::::.:i:::::3::•:::•::•::'::.::':::.:•:::::::.:;:.::•-,::::::.:'•'' *:'VIP:::•:•:•7'..?•:•:::•:*:: ••••••I*:•.7*4'......:--.7•:•:'4.•:::'•...7:*.Z.,••••Qt.::$.7 4•.?.:::-.•• . • •••••••••••••• ••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••.•••••.•••••.••.••.............. i • ::::.::.:::::::.::.::.:::::::.:;:•:::::::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::k:::: :,::::::::.: ......4.:::::::::Zi://•:••••...4./.../.11.414/444.4.:4:14/4.4:111•://,41:::•11111...1.: ,........,•.••.••.:•:•:.•.c••.•,•.•-:..•,•-..:*:•:•.•.•'.•......••.•.•.•.•.•••::::::•:•:•:•::::::::•.•::::::::.:::›.•''..:.:::. .......I:..4•••4.••••:•:///••••:•:144.144:1•111•4 4.P.14:4://iiiiii rill!..•44:. I .............• ••••••••.•••• i . • ' . •.-.e.e.v..-,•:::::-.4:•:::f.e.:44::;::::::v.e..::;::),:::::•,,II:4:::*,:t..-.:.::•:•:•:-:.•. .•:.:-:•:.•.._.-:•:••t:-•:.••••• : I -.:::::::::::.:::.::•.. ,.•4:4•::::::*:::::::t:::: . y:::p.i.p:• . , • . 1 •44"...c4eetv.e.,:::::vele-vio":;"%;:::,:,....vewe.v..0...-../...y,,, ....., ....---....:..........:•••,......:, ir::::::.44:::::::.iiiiii:1:1:1:1::::*:• .44.:•71.(444•444":4-))/:::**:::•:4.4:-....:,:ie.::::::/k.:4•4:::.: :••:...:••••:•:-:-:.:.-:•:•:•:•:••%•:•:•:••••% 4*".440:4%•.::::::•%:;:r.t$:%•:::::::4•4$:••::•::::,::::::::•:e:::::: . •:••-•:-:••••.•:•••::••... •.% • • , / / . . .:::::e. ,././/.. .,i .4%?...*:.:-......11.•..c.;;;f4,.. **-4.:"...-4.11:),.......... ..:: ..:::•)4.1fg.:::: :::-. .::::•..-..-::.:::*,..-..:-::::::.....:::.:•..:. • I ::::*11.15::::::%4$:::-.4:::::::::::::•:::P4::::::74::::17.44$::::::::::::::. ?....;:;.::::::.:.::::::::::•:•::::::::::•::'. • .I I . . ::$7.,..::.;•:. *:).:::::•::::4:444.:r:Vt/4"::::::".e:::: :::::(14:::".• yl--....:•:.:7-:....:•:•:-:•:.%•:•:•:-:••••:•:•:•• . •i(1) - • .• • • • I , : • • • l• : --ir 3wIZ---•"''-.'' '''''''''dli6=""a=41m --..-----....---7--fi:- ................................•.... . .,;',"7:5•:-.=`;:••7,', .c-•,=X•X-;7.-7. e.-NS-4, "X -4.- •÷::5,-.:+:: :::;::•-i-:-;;SS:•:-:•:;:;:•". :.::::.:::::::::*::::*:.::.:::::: :::::::::: ":::.::.::.::::::::::::::". l'i .• • 1 I -• N . . . ,• ; ./ . • _ :::•:-:•:•:•••" . • 1 • I 1 li ,-- -.- / . / / •' • , i i , . : A 4 ..i.. i rl A 1-L' N SR .. • / I z 0 / ' ,• • .. - , , HIOH SrHOCY / • -,---7. , / i 1 • `, ,' , . ,• , ... &---_____ . . / / I i .•_ /c. 7 ''- '' '''- '-- I 2 11 4- 5 C. 7 I __ ___, . •• i , i• • • ,i`c — ‘. \ . • 6 -' ,- - / / '. , ". ., 1 • / • ,• '..1,..,- ' •• / / ,...-- ,'-'7-11_r- '. N - ,. ; .• ! - /•• - -,,c;-- -'•• .0. 19 20 Z! 2:.-C.-4- --1- / / , • li I I ,.. / ' ILi :_. 1 ;,...--.;---T--.." .17. .-• 1-7-7,--7.e'---714,...;ok.= .•• •. 1 '..1 '• / / , / .• , . •'. 3 • 1 i / •_:.- . ..•,...N-',...14• .?:, i,'-,..3• ,...tel ,'- •7-4 15",—- -r- - — —,: ' ,' / .- • • / . .-i—r '2'8...r--a i / • , •A • -,- 2101 -. .- . .,I t. t:Ii-o.st'64-S. 34. 3 2 ...., , CO. .5 4 , • ..-'....- . . • ____..., ". I " ' 'I— t.,. I I / '. :i i 7. 10'Lt.- -7 PL --cr - , 1 ,. / / . ,, ..:%--, ' ' T -7- -,0• ..., ‘g ; A V ' /, / -2 ,.... .-.• - .- ! ..• , • , . NIL...-.—...--....---: I I/ / I. - .. •-• ''. '• ' • 1: 5. .c.l.7. 7 ; e 9 •1°1 11 a: I • •,....,.i ,k ' . • .1 _ -,-- • •a ' •' • I> " . •. ,• • . 7' . •'Il •a / / / • •. .' • I .. Y • e r / i ..--- . .__-. --_.__•____ . ---.- --•-• . r..-- m. UN alt—i—.5. .Ellie,-7im , . . , lilla mann.. au ass kis ma ion se ..... •-- I I 5 INC41.5 FAMRY . •— , - _. • 1 : MEDIVIM GINSIIY Mutli rA mi a . . • I :.::: :::: : ‘OMMRLIAlr • 1 . • 8 .. . --- • - ?------ . _ . ....,... _ ._. / P1-161.-It/aLlA51 PL1 OW 4- •-. • - - 1 / \ ENDING OF BILE