No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA87-090 ( (4) ) ERC/Dskl AG121687 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA DECEMBER 16, 1987 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10:00 a.m. PENDING: ECF-077-87 DAVID WILLET SA-088-87 Application for site plan approval to allow an eight- unit apartment building. Property located at 354 Taylor Avenue N.W. Letter sent advising applicant to submit new data, withdraw application, or expand the issuance of a DS. ECF-084-87 PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT (VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION) SA-100-87 Application for a site plan approval to construct an e)i �,r' electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. dew Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway. ECF-082-87 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CU-065-87 Application for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a four level parking garage. c .Y'^ h/ Property located at 400 South 43rd Street. SpP" Awaiting new data from applicant's consultant (Jacobson & Associates) on aesthetic issue of appearance of sloping sidewalls. CONTINUED: ECF-066-87 SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) . which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 °Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-078-76 FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - SA-090-87 PHASES IV & V) SM-013-87 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 square feet each and for two. one-story buildings having - 30,750 square feet and 19,000 square feet, and for ,. kC7 C(\ substantial shorelines development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-i channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Awaiting response to earlier ERC comments on this project. I � . Environmental Review Committee Agenda December 16, 1987 Page 2 ECF-060-87 ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES) SA-071-87 Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148,000 sq. ft. warehouse with a 24,500 sq. ft. office mezzaine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial development permit. Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrooka. Creek. Awaiting additional information on wetland issue and grade and fill permit. NEW PROJECTS: ECF-088-87 THE VYZIS COMPANY SP-102-87 Application for special permit for fill and grading permit to allow the filling of approximately 14,320 \a!14111. cubic yards of material on 20.9 acres of property. Note: Site was previously filled with permit No. SP- 134-78. Property located on the west side of Lind Avenue S.W. between the 1900 to 2300 block. ECF-080-87 AZARIA ROUSSO CU-096-87 Revisions and addition to the Service Linen Supply building. Application for a Conditional Use permit to allow the expansion of an industrial use on property 00vje7v vul19-1j zoned B-1, business use. The expansion will add 2,800 sq. ft. on a second floor addition and remodeling of 2,775 sq. ft. of second floor space and a new roof over 1SJL 4,500 sq. ft. of work space. Property located at 903 South 4th Street. ECF-091-87 ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS Application to install double-faced billboard sign 12 �� 4v/„t�^°� feet by 25 feet. Property located at 333 Sunset Blvd. N. ECF-092-87 ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS 'Application to install a double-faced billboard 12 feet �, s / ,.x by 25 feet. Property located at 3540 N.E. 4th Street. ECF-089,8/ PAUL WILCOX (AGENT FOR DONALD DUNCAN) SME-007-87 Application for shorelines exemption permit to repair an existing bulkhead with a single-family residence on the shore of Lake Washington. ( (4) ) ERC/Dskl AG12987 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA DECEMBER 9, 1987 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10: 00 a.m. PENDING: ECF-077-87 DAVID WILLET SA-088-87 Application for site plan approval to allow an eight- unit apartment building. Property located at 354 Taylor Avenue N.W. ECF-066-87 SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142, 000 cubic yards of removal and 295, 000cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. ECF-078-76 FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - SA-090-87 PHASES IV & V) SM-013-87 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 square feet each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 square feet and 19, 000 square feet, and for substantial shorelines development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. NEW PROJECTS: ECF-060-87 ALASKA DISTRIBUTORS (LANCE MUELLER AND ASSOCIATES) SA-071-87 Applications for approval of 1) a site plan for Phase I of a complex to allow the construction of a 148, 000 sq. ft. warehouse with a 24, 500 sq. ft. office mezzaine; 2) a special permit for fill and grade to allow approximately 47,400 cubic yards of material on the site; and 3) shorelines substantial development permit. Property located on the north side of S.W. 27th Street at the 800 block and directly west of Springbrook Creek. ECF-086-87 C.E. LOVELESS BSP-091-87 Application for administrative approval to allow a binding site plan, dividing 8.41 acres of developed property (shopping center) into five - (5) lots. Property located at 4601, 4613 , 4619 and 4621 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. ECF-084-87 PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT (VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION) SA-100-87 Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway. Environmental Review Committee Agenda December 9, 1987 Page 2 CONTINUED: ECF-082-87 VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER CU-065-87 Application for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a four level parking garage. Property located at 400 South 43rd Street. CORRESPONDENCE: Memo from Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer, Re: Valley Medical Center Master Plan Parking Structure, December 3, 1987. OTHER JURISDICTIONS: File C87-1128 Notice of Appeal M.L. King Memo. Baptist Church Proponent: James Winbush Description: A building permit for a 6,528 sq. ft. church, office and attached classroom on 4. 13 acres in the RS 7200 (Residential, Single Family, minimum lot size 7200 sq. ft. ) zone. Location: S.W. corner of S.E. 116th Street and 37th Avenue S.E. : 13911 S.E. 119th Street. STR: S.E./N.W. 10-23-05 The threshold determination of non-significance issued for the above proposal on 11-03-87 has been appeal. A public hearing before the Zoning and Subdivision Examiner to decide the appeal has been scheduled for January 19, 1988, at 10: 30 a.m. in Room 854 of the King County Administration Building. • J . ..AIF AL. g.,POWEIt AVE.S.W, SUITE t0?. fiENTON,WA 98055 12�1 235-1677 CA CA _ J y Iry Corey Grisez Equities First City E 4 ,y;o .•;,I,..:: 800 5th Ave Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 February 08, 1988 Dear Corey, about our parking. Per our conversation today I feel very strongly lease agreement it states that we wil to 4cepvees When we signeder our To have that 5 spaces per thousand square feet. Since we are a Credit Union will not be sufficient for our needs. we have a heavy amount of traffic and need all our spaces. Please do what you can to maintain our needs. Sincerely, C. C.{[ L...l- -..�� Eris P. Sullivan Branch Manager _r, f, 1 r `-s, Design . T Management Software, Inc. February 8, 1988 Ma. Corey Grisez First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Ms . ;lrisez : This letter is in regards to the present parking situation within the Black River Corporate Park. As discussed at the time of the signing of our lease the present parking allotment calls for 5 parking stalls per 1000 square feet. We find that we do need all of this parking allotment and that any variation (with the exception of allowing more parking) would not be adequate . The parking requirements were of prime concern to us when signing our lease. Our two previous locations in the downtown area did not provide adequate parking facilities and thus was partial impetus for us to look in this area for office space, If these parking requirements do change we would regret that we would be forced to look elsewhere for office space at the expiration of our present lease. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Design Management Software, Inc. Cathy A, ,Mills Vice President ":R.:,�A�y� •��' �'ro. 3 N?v,�'r .Y�`it� �. ty�j* n5.i�,qq `a} ,��t i� � ,i .4'�°: ,tt's �.�;,'i'•; e f x ;;�",, F, �..h -`#� = S�t FY�4 •j_ "'ri.., Y. { ,r a d , r�:. !x1'•. i'U 4r n ri "Y :o a px > ,—;s +,. . :,. ��.�,�$" �,c i� .,f�t,5%i..S.yy2$lA #r 7�£.-y;;�7„7���y��3iLL--1 u, x1 7't 1 (�C�} ,r C .' � � X�-n`c 4wt� C`` t ti �'�•�3 Y� ri 6 i�r F ,.. n `i, -,I ;{ .t•;�/�.�� t 441 3 }>,1 1 i ',1af Tit r' i'^i7. :i4�?3 vt*rjm ,,,,,j/^ t4 1:,4 „•-grit z S S,:?..a�'�.? R .,,ai tiT ,. zt..:1:,,,,, -1i.� (Jt.,4•�1 � ;�.,." „ 7+ o ,. t 3.}y �' .'�4wyk'st.1...`# ,1� ,it'hfa'"irE+M ratty )wfi'4, rl.?' j° +.•tr,. ,:,Y 'c:. y get, r �_y0 , try`.{3pa a'Y 3ha ir �i a"s a n{,'�J'p .?k�+L' k ;�t M r#,..> r .' '1 + .r 'i"., 't, t x il`o 't'� ,a .si. eat i; Ssr, �d�'r" t,,`�`�,. t � t 3rv,a ,rb.;.a. r. w )t axi f 4 M42 ,y ,, t crart yyaa Jtht J 2,Fr,)}\ i >;is yt y rEare,f t,w a . is x a 4 4 , ':},. '- '!.1. IetisO1hb�9i itc3y NbrhuestJiC,Poye A"befg,A AlI.A; 44l"A Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 December 31, 1987 1 Mr. Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator and Environmental Review Committee ,.5 '-' ii Cityof Renton `_ f= . + 11 P 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 ; -vN.-r . Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Phases IV and V Files SA-090-87 & SM-013-87 & ECF-078-87 Original Submittal October 13, 1987 ERC letter November 30, 1987 ERC determination of non-significance dated December 21, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: Per review of the ERC's determination of non-significance, we disagree with the conditions and find them "unreasonable and not acceptable." The following comments are submitted for additional information and conjunction with our previous letter dated December 8, 1987. This letter is submitted to ERC for reconsideration prior to final issuance of declaration of non-significance and prior to the appeal period. CONDITION 1 1. Additional, drainage swales- on this phase of the site are unreasonable and are not required and affect the developable rights of the owner, especially in conjunction with the past approvals and direction by the City of Renton. A. All drainage for this phase of development flows to Oakesdale, to 7th, to Naches and into the existing biofiltering swale and then into the P-1 pond, this is adequate to filter this phase of development plus additional future phases and the Black River (north half) of the total development. Reference attached letter from Entranco Engineers. Forcing unnecessary additional biofiltering on this phase of development is not necessary. (1) The land for Oakesdale Avenue was dedicated to the City by FCE. (2) The prime participant for the LID for Oakesdale was FCE. (3) The drainage system in the street was designed to service this phase of development and paid for through the LID for Oakesdale. (4) The improvements for storm drainage in the street besides being paid for (majority) by the owner (FCE) are in addition, subject Page 2 to assessment charges for use, which were appealed and denied by the hearing examiner. FCE paid for the storm line, pays to use the storm line and should be allowed to use the storm line as originally planned, biofiltering of water will occur and will be adequate at Naches without additional biofiltering swales added to this phase. The City itself drains Oakesdale directly into the P-1 Channel with limited biofiltering before entering the P-1 Channel. Why should this development phase be required to do any more than the City requires of itself. The proposal, however does not reflect using direct access to the P-1 Channel for storm drainage, but ties into a biofiltering system planned, programmed and adequate to serve these sites. 2. We request condition 1 be eliminated. CONDITION 2 1. Efforts have already been taken to preserve wildlife habitat and existing significant trees have been preserved to the maximum extent possible. Reference LPN letter dated December 8, 1987, attached. Additional efforts will be made in the SE section of Phase IV, Buildings A and B, to preserve additional trees through a final balance of required parking per building s.f. per the City's definition of gross building area. The planning for this development occurs today in order to develop the property. We see no reason to remove any of the retained trees in the future unless for safety reasons. 2. The use of landscape preserves for reducing parking is a good planning tool for development when the owner has some control on parking and the tenancy in the buildings. In multi-tenant buildings minimizing parking below code and what is acceptable in the market takes the development out of the market. Considering the process it takes to obtain permits and approvals for buildings, this is not a viable option and places an unreasonable restraint on development that is not required by code or ordinance. 3. The LID for Oakesdale had an initial budget of $20,975 for landscaping as established by the City of Renton. This was inadequate to do anything but seed the LID areas. FCE has contributed the difference in costs to establish $170,694 to enhance the landscaping along Oakesdale, on this side of the property, and along the P-1 Channel. This includes three inch caliper trees and irrigation systems. These contribute greatly to enhanced wildlife habitats and has already been planted through the additional efforts and costs of FCE (owner) . 4. We request condition 2 be eliminated as extensive planning efforts have mitigated and preserved the majority of on site trees and supplemented the street and P-1 Channel areas (in addition to the proposed landscape concepts submitted) . • Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 • Page 3 V-.-..- e 9 f l C' ^ sC C �) L.,. ....:.J,, ,, : ,1' '' 34J t'' _•.._e ,. CONDITION 3 1. "Impervious surfaces not be allowed to intrude within the drip line of existing trees, " this is an acceptable condition - however in some cases intrusion can be tolerated and needs to be reviewed by landscape architects on an individual basis. CONDITION 4 1. On site amenities are described in the (attached) LPN letter December 8, 1987, item 3 and are acceptable as defined as a condition. Leaving an "open ended" program to "the satisfaction of the city landscape architect" is unreasonable and undefinable. In addition to the items referenced to be provided, shower facilities will be provided in this phase of development. The jogging trail referenced under construction in the letter is being paid for by FCE (owner) above the LID costs and needs to be considered part of this phase of development as an amenity. 2. We request this condition be revised to reflect the items as defined in the LPN letter. CONDITION 5 1. Condition 5 is acceptable, however, oil water separations are already required as a standard by the City of Renton and probably does not have to be included as a condition. Respectfully, 4L N)ARCHI CTS & PLANNERS r Ro a A. Ber Pi sident RAB: clp Enclosures: Ltr. Entranco Engineers, December 10, 1987 Ltr. LPN Architects, October 27, 1987, November 3, 1987, December 8, 1987 Ltr. BRH, December 31, 1987 cc: Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Schuman, First City Equities Barbara Moss, First City Equities David Morency, Entranco Engineers Bob Roed, Bush, Roed, & Hitchings Charles Blumenfeld Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.IA., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 DEC 31 '87 11:28 BRrH 206 323 7135 P. 1 BUSH, ROED & riITCHINGS, INC. 2009 Minor Avenue East } _ .• • Seattle, Washington 98102 "":'� -1"7 C Area 206/ 323-4144 December 31, 1987 pDg2dyEg Royce Berg Leeson Pomeroy Northwest1127 Pine, Suite 300EC 31 1987 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Blackriver Corp. Park LPN Architects & P1annefS Storm Drainage Dear Royce: I am writing this letter to explain the reasons behind the storm drainage system design for that portion of the Blackriver Development within the plat of Washington Technical Center. Basically the plat consists of the property bounded on the east by Powell Avenue, on the south by Grady Way, on the west by Oakesdale Avenue, and extending approximately 600 feet north of SW 7th Street. As directed by the Hearing Examiner's Report and recommendation for the plat approval under file No. PP-056-80, compliance with the conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee was mandatory. Listed below are numbers 5, 6 & 7 of the ERC conditions relating to storm drainage. 5. Dedicate an easement for storm drainage along the north property line from the northeast corner of the site to the Black River channel. 6. Direct all storm drainage from the site east of Springbrook Creek to the upstream end of the old Black River channel for the purpose of wetland treatment (as per the water quality impact assessment). 7. Extend the existing storm sewer line of the site (in a appropriate size) northwestward to the upstream end of the old Black River channel. To comply with the above conditions the following storm drainage network was established. A. Area north of SW 7th Street and east of Powell Avenue SW was designed to discharge directly to an open ditch along the north property line via pipe in Powell Avenue. B. Area north of 7th Street between Neches Avenue and Powell Avenue drainage system discharges partially into the ditch along the north property line and partially into a pipe in Neches which discharges into the above mention ditch. C. Area north of 7th Street between Neches Avenue & P-1 channel to be drained via pipe in 7th Street and Neches to said open ditch on north property line. CIVIL ENGINEERS/LAND SURVEYORS ry Blackriver Corp. Park December 31, 1987 '; f_J Page 2 ..1.n_.. _ D. Area south of 7th Street between Powell Avenue & Oakesdale Avenue was divided into three major drainage systems. 1. The South one-fourth of the area has to drain to the south because the topographic features made it impossible to drain northerly to the old Black River channel per the ERC condition number 6. 2. The area along Powell Avenue and 7th Street drains to a pipe installed during the first phase of development by the HdK Company. This pipe which is 300 feet west of Powell connects into the pipe installed in 7th Street which in turn connects to the pipe in Naches. 3. Remaining portion of drainage discharges into the storm sewer pipe built as part of the Oakesdale Avenue SW project. This portion of the Oakesdale Avenue system connects into the large 60 inch pipe in Naches Avenue via 7th Street. The surface water runoff collected by the above drainage systems discharge into the old Black River channel per Condition Number 6 imposed on this property by the Environmental Review Committee except that small area lying in the extreme southerly portion of the project. The major purpose for directing the runoff to the upstream and of the old Black River channel via the extension of the existing 60 inch storm sewer line in Naches was to have the surface water runoff flow through the old channel for "wetland treatment" before discharging into the P--1 Channel/Pond drainage system Sincer , obert M. oed RMR/scr •r am r.i rvl r p.,�•1s1 r.'�. Dj,/eM}pj ry,t. .I, v, •to.if+;e Y ;. ° ,<�•,•t •, :•,n r•y,. .t. 41,1 r• ' '' ,. nN d r11V . \ :t ,..i.( , 'F`7 iT_11��{ri n 9r'r r• It 1r., .r A, tb,yi . t R , ral • 1 1 jr dr'(1 ' 4 k ' r 4 r 4"�p J l i 4 .r - ,. rrl a� r 1 1 ;,, k y. y ►ytp'94,4. 'r 1 +fie}tt a �v �(S,*, tSc4� ra' tn.ri;ir ,v jt i;li "= •�� .. - - .F . �.� 1 •'v r'I.l.1.rJ(1'•r`� '.`�t� •f05S � I + Jy'Y)(a•'{ �JZI y'r� �4rVB t(!l:`: ,;�r,tr �, y, , t', '�hr 2„,....,}r:. �(�t,[„r ,, ;,e,r� ,,};, ,,,,,,,,t''. : y�?,„,,,,,r k; �'7,R}3.`, 3� ,fir ^ `� ,4a�} , -t. A., `. �.5-iY , c, ~ �+r�. � SI', i H'1411' •l ►�r c d c;'''.t 'yI �t 1 f ! Sii� :if /. ' y t f. -I, Y''+.. ' , 4 [[ a4,.. y((�� �ryy�� ��'�ffff���� �.j ♦♦ �v Y l F S Y]r y!1i �,eR- :,? ..5_ 1 • H. -}�l •',., ,1; „,.,:Jd;)t;*.A., :!-I1a.�L 'M Hr AS� �..W. .4) {�/;� ' Y. ,, Y .. , , FJ S •�',ii! .;� tA,4t. tf 5d Y7/ r1-'(�.rX• ', 1•r47•l7111,4e g1e, ltitr 4 • + ' . ..�7. ,�f i a 1�ktte.0 :' 1. k 'al - S `°1 1.':rfit'. 'HYrti !j f 4 ,'.. ,' . , i V i'iA f 5h1'{ .T, Ij" A , r f : rt A i ' -,t !Irr it - • s �i a r'� 1 '2. I;bent:1 1'64'16:V I ,fhwaiETh6.i 110'6 `'A1 Ilotg,'A.I.A.' 12yPlnti Sheef,Nite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 December 8, 1987 ... ,.,' ' ,,.... j .. I • q' ,l 'FEB HORS Mr. Don Erickson, AICP b. -: 7` " i jn. J .- Zoning Administrator and " Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Phases IV and V Files SA-090-87 & SM-013-87 Original Submitted October 13, 1987 ERC letter November 30, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: The following comments are submitted per your letter of November 30, 1987 as additional information to be included with the ERC Committee's final recommendation to the Hearing Examiner and City Council. We appreciate your comments and in keeping with the phases already established we believe Phases IV and V will also result in the higher quality we seek for the Blackriver Corporate Park development. . 1. Water Quality/Wetlands: Water drainage, for these sites will flow to Oakesdale north to 7th, east to Naches, and north to the swale for biofiltering before entering into the P-1 Channel. Per City of Renton direction and per original EIS for property and per storm lines installed in Oakesdale LID by FCE and Renton for this specific purpose. This system has been reviewed in context with the overall development and the existing biofiltering swale off Naches is adequate to accommodate these sites and other areas of the total development. A specific analysis is attached to this letter with a report by the project environmental engineer, David Morency of Entranco Engineers. Oil/water separators will be installed per City. standards. (See attached report) 2. Glare: All glass reflects at certain angles of incidence. Bumpers on cars, windshields on cars, also reflect light at times when hit in certain manners. The use of "reflective glass" evolved from the energy crisis this nation entered and provides an efficient means to control heat gain in buildings, which is the dominant use of energy in office buildings (even in the northwest). Phase II on Powell Avenue of this development currently exists with reflective glass elements on three stories of the buildings, 45% outward reflectance) as do other buildings in the City of Renton with no adverse impacts on the adjacent "micro climate". • r q • I� Mr. Don Erickson Page Two V-EB j.t 'Vz1d December 8, 1987 . There is no inclined reflective glass on this building, all glass is vertical and all reflective glass will be kept at or below the 23% outward reflectance which is the middle of the range. Reflective glass besides having energy efficient aspects also allows a building to change colors and tones depending 'on the weather and time of day which provides aesthetic value and interest to the building. Reflective glass will not be used at the major entry points to the buildings, tinted vision glass will be used. 3. Recreation: Benches and outdoor seating. The drawings did not reflect amenity areas; the intent was as follows: Phase Four, Bldgs. A & B, . 3 Story Office — Two benches and paved sitting areas at each major entry of each building. Two benches and a paved sitting area to be provided at the southeast corner of this phase in the extra landscape area. In addition, raised planter walls will provide seating at the main entry at side. Phase Five, Bldgs. C & D — Two benches and a paved sitting area will be provided at the main plaza between the buildings. Two benches and a paved sitting area will be located in the landscape area along the trees at Oakesdale Avenue. Recreational activities like jogging will connect within the master plan when all master plan issues are resolved. A master plan concept for these areas was submitted over a year ago to the City but could not be processed by the City. These items will be developed per phase of development. The jogging trail for this phase is under construction west of Oakesdale and paid for by First City Equities in the LID. These trails ultimately will connect to Blackriver Corporate Park trails and should connect with City trails and other trails to Fort Dent Recreational Park which is within a mile of this phase of development. 4. Retention of Existing Trees As many of the existing trees as possible were saved through our site planning process and were reviewed by which areas of preservation would provide a balance of significant trees to soften the edges of. development along the public streetscape and the property boundary lines. In addition 13 small trees will be relocated along the property lines to provide additional mature landscaping.. 72% of the existing trees are retained or relocated. In addition, special effort was made by First City Equities to preserve. large trees and adjacent trees in the Soils Conservation fill—setback area (200 ft. into property) when the City of Renton finished excavating the P-1 Channel. No require— ments were placed on the City to preserve these trees. In addition new 1'x,son Pomeroy r lOrlt hwest. Inc.. Royce A.Berg.A.I.A.. 1127 Pine Street.Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Mr. Don Erickson f Page Three December 8, 1987 y J It •• trees and plantings are to be installed in the landscape areas which will dramatically increase the number of trees on the site. The following is a tabulation of saved trees. Existing Trees Phase IV Phase V (clusters count as one tree) Preserved: 11 9 (4 are clusters) (6 are clusters) Relocated: 13 • 0 Removed: 9 3 (+ 1 row of deciduous) 4 % Preserved or Relocated ±73% ±69% Overall Average = ±72% preserved or relocated Per Existing Tree Survey: 46 trees shown (dense hedgerow of smaller deciduous trees running east and west counted as 1 tree) Landscape Open Space: Phase IV 25% Provided Phase V 28% Provided Required '20% It should be noted that Cottonwood trees are messy trees and contaminate the screens of heating and air conditioning units as well as clogging roof drains when left too close to buildings. They also clog catch basins in the streets and parking lots. This is one of the reasons the City of Renton would not allow street trees in the medians when Oakesdale was designed. The roots are close to the surface and ultimately raise paving and invade water, sewer and storm lines. We have complied with recommended mitigation measures and have saved as many trees as possible in areas we feel benefit the development and community the best. There are no requirements which mandate preservation of all trees except FCE preservation areas for the Riparian Forest one half mile to the north of this property and not part of this submittal. We have exceeded the minimum landscape requirement of 20% to 25% at Phase IV, Buildings A and B; and 28% at Phase V, Buildings C and D in order to preserve this amount of trees. Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street.Suite 300 Seattle.WA 98101 (206)583.8030 Mr. Don Erickson Page Four. Yl=. . December 8, 1987 5. Access Access to these sites (ingress and egress) are dictated by previous comments in public hearings by the Fire Marshall of the City of Renton, and the Oakesdale LID. Development of Phases I and II provided access points to this phase for emergency vehicle access to Oakesdale from Powell Avenue. The major east—west access aisles reflect this and dictate basic on site circulation. Access to Oakesdale was limited to the access points shown. We have added one additional curb cut for right in and right out for Buildings A and B. This curb cut aligned further north originally (and can still be an alternate approach, per attached sketch reflecting major on site vehicular lanes) but shifted to the south to avoid relocating a fire hydrant. On site circulation allows north—south access between sites but does not encourage high speed direct lanes (which are not desirable on site). Pedestrian access has been provided between buildings, from buildings to the sidewalks on the street and a major east—west access walk was provided to the adjacent properties and phases into Oakesdale. We see no need for additional walks and prefer to keep as much area in pervious surface and landscaping as possible and maintain rights to develop this property per marketing and allowed use per zoning. Parking amounts meet City code requirements of 1/200 SF of building and provide a reasonable balance of allocation to each building yet providing different exposures for buildings. Respectfully, LPN ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS Ro. ce A. Berg P esident RAB:cpm Enclosures: Ltr. Entranco Engineers Ltr. LPN Architects, October 27, 1987 Ltr. LPN Architects, November 3, 1987 LPN site plan reduction reflecting alternate access point to site cc: Barbara Moss, First City Equities Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Schuman, First City Equities l(.rr,,r,n Pomeroy Noittiwest, Inc.. Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street.Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583 8030 ENTRANCO ENGINEERS,INC. LAKE WASHINGTON PARK BUILDING f208)827-1300 5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N E.. KIRKLAND.WA 9e033 December 10, 1987 Barbara Moss, Director of Planning First City Equities ° ' 0 Ica 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: Phase 4 and 5 Development, Area 2 Treatment of Stormwater Runoff Black River Corporate Park Entranco Project' No. 87116-60 Dear Barbara: The purpose of this correspondence is to provide an evaluation of the probable water quality treatment effectiveness of the present storm drainage plan for the Black River Corporate Park (refer to the recently revised plan dated 12/10/87, enclosed) . The new plan would involve the construction of approximately 4,100 feet of drainage swales or biofilters for the treatment of stormwater runoff. The value of these areas as wildlife habitat is also addressed in this letter. In order to simplify the discussion of these issues I have divided the site into five major drainage areas and have numbered them accordingly (refer to enclosed drainage plans) . Please note that whenever I refer to the '°EIS" in this discussion I am referring to the water quality appendices of the Earlington Park (1981) and Black River Office Park (1982) Final EISs where the original stormwater treatment concept was presented. In my opinion, effective stormwater treatment will be provided for all areas of the site except for Area 3 and some runoff from S.W. Oakesdale Avenue that will drain directly into Springbrook Creek and the P-1 Pond without treatment. The absence of stormwater treatment in Area 3 could be addressed by providing additional open swale (biofilter) drainage to replace underground storm drains. However, it should be noted that in the original EIS it was assumed that no treatment would be provided for this area. It was also assumed that the relatively small amount of untreated runoff from this area would not have any significant adverse impact on water quality in the P-1 Pond - in part due to the small volume of runoff compared to total flows in Springbrook Creek (i .e. , due to the benefit of dilution) , and in part because existing water quality in Springbrook Creek is already significantly degraded. The provision of approximately 2,100 feet of biofilter swale area for Area 1 runoff will represent a significant improvement in stormwater treatment compared to the original EIS drainage plan. In the original EIS it was assumed that runoff from this area would be treated in the old Black River Channel wetlands along with other site runoff. EVERETT OFFICE 516 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING 1206)258.6202 1602 HEWITT AVENUE.EVERETT.WA 98201 • Ms. Barbara Moss G- _ i t_ (• gq December 10, 1987 Page 2 Assuming that the width of the biofilter swale will vary from 20 to 40 feet, the total amount of new treatment area will be about 1 to 2 acres. On the basis of design criteria employed in the . original .EIS, this amount of wetland area should be more than sufficient to remove pollutant fractions associated with particles of 43 microns or greater. This means that pollutant removal rates should be in the range of 60 to 90 percent for most pollutants (refer to Tables 1 and 2) . [It should be noted that a basic premise of the design approach is to provide sufficient sedimentation (treatment) area to treat the 1- to 2-year design storm and that storms of greater magnitude and lower return frequency (e.g., once in 5 or more years) would receive lower treatment.] The location of these biofilter swales will be along the margin of the riparian forest preserve, as shown in the enclosed drainage plan. This location will promote groundwater recharge of stormwater runoff and will also make it possible to divert overflow runoff into the riparian forest area. Groundwater recharge and surface water diversion through the riparian forest should assist in preserving the forest habitat and may even result in the creation of a more definitive wetland habitat. However, care should be taken in the design of drainage facilities in this area so that overflow runoff is routed into and through the riparian forest in such a manner as to avoid channelization of flow and creation of erosion and sedimentation problems in the P-1 pond. Drainage control in Area 2 has been affected by loss of old Black River Channel wetlands, as previously mentioned. One out of the three original acres of wetland was lost during construction of the P-1 Pond, and another acre will be filled by First City Equities in conjunction with construction of buildings and parking areas. The latter filling by First City Equities will occur in a manner consistent with the plan that was approved in the original EIS. Although this loss of wetland area will result in some reduction in treatment efficiency, the remaining wetland area is still sufficient to provide an adequate degree of stormwater treatment. On the basis of the original ' EIS stormwater treatment criteria, I have determined that adequate treatment area is available to remove the 40-micron particle size and larger, providing 60 to 90 percent pollutant removal efficiencies for most pollutants. Again, I refer you to Tables 1 and 2 as the basis for these criteria. This analysis included treatment of off-site runoff that is conveyed to the old Black River Channel via the existing 60-inch storm drain. On the basis of Table 1 criteria, 145 square feet of sedimentation area is required per cfs of flow to remove particle fractions of the 40-micron size and greater. For the 110 cfs flow originally calculated in the EIS, this computes to approximately 16,000 square feet. On the basis of these criteria, the one acre (43,560 square feet) of remaining wetlands should provide adequate stormwater treatment. In order for treatment to be provided effectively, however, I recommend Ms. Barbara Moss o December 10, 1987 r -' �� �;rx Page 3 that a gabion-type structure be located at the outlet of the old Black River Channel where it discharges into the P-1 Pond. This will have the effect of creating standing water conditions behind (upstream of) the gabion and increasing the surface area and effectiveness of wetland treatment contact. Other factors tending to enhance treatment in the remaining wetland area include: (1) a reduction in the total volume of runoff that will be treated in this area (a significant volume of runoff will be treated within Area 1 and will not be routed to the old Black River Channel wetlands as originally planned) ; and (2) additional treatment area (1,500 feet x 20 feet) that will be provided in the form of new biofilter drainage swales located east of Nachess Avenue S.W. (about 750 feet of this swale has already been constructed) . Stormwater runoff from Areas 4 and 5 will also discharge to biofilter swales and will receive adequate treatment. In summary, I find that the presently proposed storm drainage plan will actually result in enhanced treatment of stormwater runoff from the Black River Corporate Park as compared to the plan originally proposed in the EIS. Adequate treatment will also be provided for off-site runoff, and I do not anticipate any significant increases in pollutant concentrations in Springbrook Creek or the P-1 Pond as a result of development of the site as proposed. Sincerely, ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC. jotraW � 4(U iet4�cc ( Gvt David A. Morency Associate DAM:gg Enclosures Entranco Engineers, Inc. December 10, 1987 TABLE 1 Minimum Sediment Basin Area Requirements for Selected Particles (per cfs Outflow Rate) Particle Minimum Area Kind of Diameter Required Material (micron) (sq. ft.) Coarse sand 1,000 3.0 Coarse sand 200 14.5 Fine sand 100 38.2 Fine sand 60 80.0 Fine sand 40 145.0 Silt 10 2,030.0 Coarse clay 1 203,000.0 Fine clay 0.1 20,300,000.0 Source: American Public Works Association, 1974. Practices in Detention of Urban Stormwater Runoff. Special Report No. 43. Entranco Engineers, Inc. December 10, 1987 (`' i_, TABLE 2 ,.Tif ( �?5-� .� Fraction of Pollutant Associated with each Particle Size Range .`,':,-r,, b: r -,`,. (Percent by Weight) PARTICLE SIZE (u) 2,000 840 -> 2,000 246 -> 840 104 -> 246 43 -> 104 <43 Total Solids 24.4 7.6 24.6 27.8 9.7 5.9 Volatile Solids 11.0 17.4 12.0 16.1 17.9 25.6 B0D5 7.4 20.1 15.7 15.2 17.3 24.3 COD 2.4 4.5 13.0 12.4 45.0 22.7 Kjeldahl Nitrogen 9.9 11.6 20.0 20.2 19.6 18.7 Nitrates 8.6 6.5 7.9 16.7 28.4 31.9 Phosphates 0 0.9 6.9 6.4 29.6 56.2 Total Heavy Metals 16.3 17.5 14.9 23.5 27.8 Total Pesticides 0 16.0 26.5 25.8 31.7 Source: U.S. EPA, 1972. Water Pollution Aspects of Street Surface EPA- Contaminants, EPA-R2-72-081. i s-- ,F 1 .� ,-.� `f'� AAILIIOAD TIIACN! .I W......UYWJI.AY - NACRES AV[.SW i ,_ ••'•• BLACKR! R CORPORATE PARK \ �• � '- ' •- '; ,'•••,\••`• (/LAC RIVER OFFICE PARK 1 •\\\,\\• • • • i II ..foss •'/� \••, BIOFILTER SWALE (TYPa r'• PUBLIC NATURAL .•` •• ., - �4, •i •ph44- Ir.l\\, •.,AII[A [AS[Y[NT•.• �� �, I • ,,,••\� • 1 n,( _ ice r-I POND• .u4, C/ 'CO.*I///%k/I%i•.. ... - 'A 'u• . .r&&a.. •�•y.,. . 4-PUMP STATION •�\..` '•,,. ., I 1 \ii--::--f.i. �- .•` �' 'i T .•`' ''!' 'BLACKRIVER COR• •- •TE PARK j q�yb.m. /� `'\/ 1 - / (VALLEY ICS/UfIM /PARK) r/ 3 l 1 2( cci , . ..t.L.. • . . 0 \ / . SW7TM st ._ as �� �, FLOW (TYP.) DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY (TYP.) 0 fe �. i t :1: 1 a J I., ,.... t__s. STORM DRAINAGE W :.11,0 7 w BLACKRIVER = '�r ` i Corporate Park i , w 1 Jo"/T. REKTOR,WASHINQTON • V V. of . i 11% 4.D NORTH Ci ' ° /�o' 12-10-87 • • 1�''}r�fjjjj',,���t.1 ;t r�•r��. wow ki6 ow 'yJi r,{�i, r�y�'y `(r.t r'ti�ly'y�4{�'h`•��.� Ry •r.Ytj�p r•.i�in{1i y'.. 1 ^��t:..,. ` !i'•?t 1 is S •r. ,ti r. '{' I i• s!t' �'l. �jv�r rr'��. +Xif O-hi. rYR JS ir. 7� 7� rr f v y �� rE .,r `r r� ' Ni �{�yt}{r'• r� -�i�,� �� Y ra •5. '{� tyh i fro{{ > AyY- •� .Nra}j � ,1H2 ,r}v}'4(;t� r74ti a},t�'srr��• y _ !cr r• r a �.., • to � J ;.4• .�Sh rt•.f rr� _11,i 1g1fl. &i �,, rY's' :^J. ;� ;r `. •! 1 '.SF � �R�•` R. j ,� c� /��ls. rA•; i✓�; .' it if-y•l ilt rr'i F:i •; +,� • i rrj. t r �� }Ly t i >Ott aec�! rit a,; r ' + '.� s Iir .,r �• . i. 1i� '� } ?? yi.i1.11�rA y Jil. rr, i rF.,.�.' •_•r„ ,. !r ,r �r Jf •.tj. >r� ff,,7 : J l,.°�• i.. .,� i • •�r. rr StY •: -,. . .t• ' • ! I ir�I r.+e • .� ,-r' • T .• Leaset1 Patnatby tne.,itbyetl A.tier ,M A., 9121 ttfna Slrr2rit.tuIh inn rir•riHIt.WA on 1 i rob)`in3 nnan November 3, 1987 ENA COURIERS 7c,, Mr. Jerry Lind Planning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Phase IV and Phase V — Drainage Site Approval Submittal — SA-090-87 Environmental Checklist — ECF-078-87 Shoreline Permit — SM-018-87 Dear Jerry: Per your conversation with Barbara Moss regarding the conflict in the Environmental Checklist and drainage drawing, the checklist is correct. All drainage for the Phases IV and V sites will go north — into Oakesdale, 7th, and Naches respectively and biofiltered in an open swale before entering the P-1 Pond. Attached is a revised print reflecting the grading and a revised reduction of the grading for your use. Respectfully, 44 Ro a A. Berg P sident • RAB:cpm Enclosure cc: Barbara Moss • Mark Miller David Schuman Ken Chin •mminimir • fix. �7�f ri• •• \• \ • _.1 • �`� • ;, ` �' drip_� -1 1 .... . .n l -;,, ... ,9 . 1 , „, \. . ‘ \--,.• 1. .,,. 1 1 \' . , . , , :r,,. .„,......„.„ ‘"11---1 M • I . , ii% % 10: J- 41_ _ . . \ \ 7- 011 'y Itt---_:.--.: ' *: .:; •=1 1 . ,\I''-:: • lii , 11 • i 1 /i i� I i \t.\ • e.-:,...., n .. 0--....1.: B . .\.,\. II ,11mik _—L 1 •, .■;.• , Wi211 �l9I1 III II11I 1• ' ` i , .t• c- ,•.•i r i • -)' t \\\ !1! 1 1 I.. , 1 Mil 0 _ • — I CO as< i =I , ,i / 9 xi • \ \ ' — \ ' . 4 ,.._ ::•,.,...... 2 7C Xi t ' f' Q-.a"t 1\----- I--- I I!4 c V.N %'''' '''\ t\\ l v a , , S E—) p ?t •' First City Equities - r„ 1 a Y- •BlackRiver Corporate Park ' L '. • PHASE IV&V Renton,Washington 0Q 11 t J .. •r u -:I t'.: ,., s: N ti�'{}yy�T1��Yy(n• An Ii • f '�R i7 i j'.j r.R���l l�.s S y J R'l � ^V rlr.•1 C '` !t. _ WEIO Mart tlIV,7.• ''rat •"1"�E., 'z rl,'SI•'1; !t"�•4f(;r '! Yl r r r+ y�,. �i•- 31„1, �q ��fy jf Yl+ll.1 S, ; z 11k r• 1�/�- +3 T•°�rti r �! .•F 1i 5�`+f1 rt S4 •S. y7tr. i.• n tr:y: r 13l a J •.-.fy JH11 t. .�''' `•yr+ • 1 • , • , }.. lesson Pomeroy Northwest.Inc„Royce A.Berg,A.I.A.,.1127 Pine Street.Suite 300 Seattle.WA 98101(206)583.8030 FIRST CITY EQUITIES ‘ October 27, 1987 OCT 281987 � c« �� iQp;r) J L.. Mr. Jerry Lind Department of Building & Zoning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase IV and V Site Plan Review (No. SA-090-87), Landscape Requirements Dear Jerry: Pursuant to the Renton Building Regulations, Section 4-718(C)5,c, requiring a minimum of 20% of the site to be retained in landscaped open spaces, our current proposed landscaped open spaces are: 1. Phase IV: + 100,770 S.F. = 257. 2. Phase V: + 54,4.50 S.F. = 28% The above areas are exclusive of all proposed walks and paved areas, and. exceed the 20% required areas. Final drawings will vary in amounts but ' will be over 20%. Please do not hesitate to call if there are any questions. Si r><cerel Y, Ken K. Chin, AIA YKKC:cpm cc: Barbara Moss Mark Miller C\;..s•—•Pr..vi 0 . 1.1. .• .1••:•.'. // il If . ' Din 0 ii i, --, .;".,Pr 1 wziii,..i. ...ks ...; ' t) .• • • ! / b t�lveI�t t I •tom, � .� d l t ,t: �L• 1 9 : t f_i� 1 r r .� . .• •. "•''..1::i; ' 110 .% A t id IEN i ‘ 1 • . - 4 .. 7,,,,,.4, .:,‘ -4 , A , 111114 ' A i :.; , - •••il, 0 .• s k x i I. •. . ,‘rel • / k.: 1, 4, • i 111 l ``.� Vs ( 1 • • 1. t •y•iA1.'•!�[; '.' �, s►!tiit■/ t. .1, - 1illam.•. ti i '� �' i 1�• I • ' "!. i 3.., r 'It t. ' ! ..iN. r- • i• �' �� \o . 1 i !..;,A3."'" li '14:,2!.<,.' ',:% ' ' -....-._ --,. -2.14,_ II ` w % - ', �: I ` - 1 ':t• � rr.ksa �it + • J I Ins ( ,. 'i m_ ItA . ••j , ,•t �t , III ` ////� ;R'a•'7_, �t� _ ��ir1/��i��"1Y 1. alp, ♦ t 7 ■ I �3. �1�'I'� `i1 Ail, ;i - = f 1+� % 1 �4* 4 t y.5. 1 V\t 1�p~ 3 1F-1:71:-. III1 :I!i} c1v_•#�i tt .a I !.,iiI I,• III • ' AF , s = IIIII�'•' 1 ` ,S. V cam- 4 1 !1 y = u 1 �, jyY h . E1�1 JIf f- 4 I �' Will; . • 1 ''\'i t '• .•, • ` �1� 3 MA I 1� f{ 1 ..= 1 ••1 t I_ I` , ' , ., Ir ..ti +,i.., . , ,'' 1+ �/. �I tI "' r�'>cc�'d1'•y� fi=.ar'■ .: i lilig • g I Z i 1 0 ,,,:•• , ...,- . T. r—,----'\-' '•• Awl "1".1711111t — —1 • . b,... � • a s/ \,. ; „; .b. , , . < L.xi ..... 1 • ut 1 i sli Q� IL �I •; x Ali♦ ' I I ')• ..�il{�• °1 . . . ii [71/. lip , • .c. i.., 1 , . . .;.. .. , f ! }. E• . .6,_ • V, t 1 i •*''. .*Pi': net City EQuitio• t� l L t t.x,'r„ :; ;t' BlackrIver Corporate Park Sc 1 �`` .•,, ;, vw•'rt PHASE IV & V �--r--, •,01 7 411 St z ,y / ;> �'. Renton.Wuhln9ton Mr. Don Erickson, AICP .. ` ' ` i - i_ Page Two r D - 'flOQ February 12, 1988 F� I k, Pedestrian Access Additional pedestrian access lanes have been provided to Building B to tie to Buildings C and D and Oakesdale. Curb Cut — Access Aisles Curb cuts will be designed to a 30 foot width or per City standards. Recreational Amenities Recreational amenities include adding a horse shoe court in a large landscaped area and adding a par exercise station along the jogging trail path paid for by First City along the P-1 Channel, which will relate to the master 'plan concept. Shower facilities will be provided in Phase IV and Phase V for employee use. Benches and seating areas will be provided. Grading and Drainage The exhibit for grading and drainage is not current. The revised exhibit was forwarded to the City November 3, 1987 and is attached in this exhibit package with the cover letter as forwarded to the City. Respectfully, LPN ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS Roy, - :erg Prz_ident RAB:cpm Enclosures: Site Plan and Reduction Letters — tenants Phase I and II, Blackriver Corporate Park cc: Barbara Moss Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 TABULATION BLOBS A 3 B SLOGS C 8 D PHASE IV PHASE V Site Area ±403,084 S.F. 1194,477 S.F. Building Area 1.148,000 S.F. ± 50,350 S.F. Building Footprint ± 47,000 S.F. ± 50,350 S.F. Site Coverage ±11.7% ±25.9% Grose Coverage ±38.7% ±25.9% Parkin w La oos sr: 4. Standard ±467 Stags ±174 Sttl. • ` Compact ±195 Stags(2010 ±61 Stalls(25%) al s✓.s•+a oma74 Handk.pp•d ±10 Stags ±4 Stalls /� -21'co-uwmc- gala.,s•c 2Y '.; TOTAL ±672 Stay(1/220.Qo..) ±239 Stags(I/271•Gram)) Li ,1(`i.°F E� �rcrraJw000 O,ioss A R.aarvd ±22 Stags or'u•2. W 459.00. \ §§ TOTAL ±694 Stab(1/213.Oro..) (I) ---- , 1.• + T.—Existing Ph..•I\ i �--Existing Phase I-'y, �V Existing I i 4 Building 2... ac a.,n ;,` in �) aot`t4.2e• 42eoD' ` _ P eorw,eoo vcm...oe� _ ._�__�_.�___..�. la t I I Yam' pi _ t`—Rr-�crTY u� 0. ii 1• a '�'� . ..cca - ae Tarr;:..� \T-� ••c c,os V .0 / II III t..=a �� m .DFa y — (� $il. I t,�'ar2i' ti I-, uA•—�� rJ T44 -i-I �E�cp... > c ' _Y ii L E:hth9 Building F. \ [L.„., !Atli C 8 '� v.,of Oro c m CD otj I E:hthg i S .... 'STORY j1■=STORY R{D A , 'L3EG4'p,,yE dl Building V I '1t' ice' [ASa�,av J0.150 Si. �[' B�BOD S.F. o • •r t_i p ? .> >W ` l� ^_T1 FF.T73• N"•••.. 7F.7 Q L .t STORY OFF10E t _ - W �. LOGA•-.` g a t 't a±74.000.R. \ De pt V W �. :-c+a_.w[r .:• '/ si/� 1 -RCS ro]{ FF.tan' _ .-- � ; a�~OF. U o 7. cF P� aed!i,'c 3.E;'�..E / i E ae,.es' - \`I % +. _-� i e r.T _ - - 11 0 1i•;'�: ads It -- -- ti n.CC a la -a'ss ^ • �ss� �� IM/Mt IwF<.tT�-„r` 7 ►•' R. ,,c o :G -\ - - 111 � tea. -1 c...w� , �, u, oddit...-.4'" 1' : Tb a , + .' 1. ` . •'/'7' 4,oRY ��°� •P - ` 'sue wasrxi.=.ow`a sroar omee� i .-a. , s li...• 'RI I�.�s.m_-v=, -raTs d.G `\ ac ...00. I s i��J �" _ .`T' .' .so .arc:., , T \ 'S n9. fi S 2.'+/ s�a 4Ce3wv' 1, 4' Ir:S' \,-- a% IO •h��i 2e'.oe-n•coTa..Hew / DESCRPTUR DATE pGT6cW4 _/ l�L l'\ i . `C. ea:-:. 1ii- et's \ °� IuTv a.m.a. /AT TIP.)EG[VhJLr 4, .„ ' .lye. .�' ., ' 3.43'2iOVoue • � F, y ° �• 4 OR R.o �' a'ocrao�osx 0 ' e —y. go+g `E_ e-4•naa., .rsTER. O D. - 24'ceC OU7u5 `,, ram,: �o•r,p.wz�'S 7a'n.W-aa[e-Jseia'Tac,es) \\e ♦ �• ,-eC.TJG FiND,rID0.4.tr(70.) f°ec•nc sTaT 4�.Y�� P-1 Channel \•M7.a0 \ a,.a.-W6 `_»'CO"p•.V.QJO • ttF.n.!-fuiT-0 2��i•Cii¢./GD \ / / ) •\.1. e.s.,1C>Taa+......-FollG'J.TL-0 UY�9T�•�G 71a!"'D!Y Q�.IP/L•D fir` Q moo-rocs-±- mg ®R%-qa G..CiC'. T BLACKRIVER /-1 SITE PLAN liOn CORPORATE PARK R WASHINGTON FIRST CITY EOlA71E3 QM111:3 PHASE IV&V REVISED, FEB.'88 SITE Jd'O&M9ioii SMUT MO DI -1 - TABULATION BLDGS A&B BLDGS C&D PHASE IV PHASE v Site Area ±403,084 S.F. ±194,477 S.F. Building Area ±148,000 S.F. ± 50,350 S.F. . Building Footprint ± 47,000 S.F. ± 50,350 S.F. Site Coverage ±11.7% ±25.9% r_ Gross Coverage ±38.7% ±25.9% Parkin a 4 Standard ±467 Stalk ±174 Std. • L Compact ±195 Stalk(29%) ±51 Stalk(25%) ca 1lsecc..2c Co+aT4 Handicapped ±10 Stalk ± 4 Stalk qq --24 ro-u.,m-- 9.iv.•=,•a 2r, rear TOTAL ±672 Stalk(1/220.Gross) ±239 Stale(1/211.Gross) EL poi.. c" �rormawoos• ct o,ras S Reserved ±22 Stalk TOTAL ±694 Stalk(1/213.Groan) e of yr 2e•W 4ena0' § Q) 1�---_S--- _\- 7,---W' 141 T--ESI t,9 Phase I� n 'c-Existing Phase I--y.. Existing 1 ii 1 BIIBdkp II' C0 ie'To?+uea�� .�--• . , I 9o1`1a'2e• 413.00. O 1- ..��.�..� � .�. _ —HceCATy In:E -W- L. ro...iooc ` ` ca- 1 4 1 r�r ..mo , 30'mrT ✓ - 'a-u ca 1mvwc -a'F.a / / ai '`-•- L __ _ 1 I 1 PN $11, 1 �� ��:2 n.__.... - 2a r� .4 L �_4oFopryE- > O I Exiting Building 'm e2' I. j' C _ IL D/', I� '� Rand or /�Ca aU d tsi Existing 3 1 7 $ } « s a 9TORY R a D 1 STORY 4 TRH.p m C 9 +I _ . }P 2QT50 SF. DOR SF. B i' ___� ^., —It RR 1TS I T.11S i,,,L Iry Q W . ., nSTORY DRICE 3\ it L 1 L. �• �'1i ;$ W V W %• __MfL • 8 y °', as `` S; + � \ `"'";'" h!�r oa� G IUFc_K*Wc-q:` .\ ;� Y'T •c'2 ` .-� 1 -GE�iui'�159 • o O.�C.wJJ6l. .a..,, \. - ( . e` .: j- tC., �.• -2 a - oa I __' ' i ra�`e�, `v� * 2 STORY OFFICE. - ` -iti crw�✓N e — ,c.�.•.K�a�i cvd ec-_r�.lre - •� '* j6•'fea• �,, i .N • 1n�- w' .. 1 .� bd 'Ai:; s.'• 'Si.,w/ - 14 nYrw ' `�I, .c.o.r...x-.¢JEL'r s x .•\ ;, i a ;.•• g et. ,`ew%'% I t'�...��- c.v c wm.L. a.n-- bGTac7pG r.•cc.0 vwl.T -/ S "i•':3 R' -'� _ lit' A _ N xo/c•lr a.o.e. .^ �I 3.US'mc.c4.a. ' , / 5 �4i/.� exK•T^G eoi� 4nwWT.YQ CIJGEa: `re O o {>r" F i moss.:``_» co:sn• �5 D 4:�Ro. .r. .2.CEGDUO.Y 4 y a. - '•!,..1 E !e-$'e) �r,.ca .0. - u•0...o s 'T� � \ �i \ ‘ ' -a(p'Tw .-1. 77 CIUGTF(O-ato Yr TReES) `+� 1, i 4.' LY.T.JG FiNG nYD4Wr(7 P) ,.6. ' L , c w+: . c SYMBOLS ♦�4!: MTm ,�\ H ceG.Cnrv- • P-1 Channel _ ///.. `ro'Go'-Pw.V� • saFen.+C�'Aa.✓F 10 is 4iecr¢-iea \ ..O.Y.r J ♦ ea9,1G TPA na 2e?eICI.TEO e..,1.1C+T12oes we:c ae...laves, MI CCTLG^qi C:.rectv.W1-1- BLACKRIVER /7 SITE , I CORPORATE PARK NORTH ri RENTON WASHINGTON FIRST CITY ROOMER REVISED, FEB.'88 SfTE PLAN s &h/ .<rT.Do y Architecture and Planning I Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 February 12, 1988 FEB it') r1c2q Mr. Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator and Ls�°'�""" '�'� Environmental Review Committee �` City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South °�� Renton, Washington 98055 R ON it Re: Blackriver Corporate Park V. �� N Phases IV and V �� Q►� Files SA-090-87, SM-013-87, and ECF-078-87 G1 :6,P Original Submittal October 13, 1987 ERC letter November 30, 1987 ERC Determination of Non—Significance dated December 21 , 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: Significant Tree Preservation Per review of staff comments and review with yourself we have revised the site plan to save seven (7) additional large, significant cottonwood trees at Phase IV — 30", 26", 20", 20", 12", 15" and 22"; and at Phase V a 30" cottonwood. This revises the tabulation from 73% of the trees originally preserved to 92% of trees preserved for Phase IV and from 69% to 75% of the trees preserved at Phase V. In order to do this, parking areas have been placed in reserve as landscape areas per City direction. Reclaiming these parking stalls would not remove any significant trees in the future. Reducing parking substantially further than this would greatly hinder the marketing efforts for leasing the buildings. Reference attached letters from existing tenants. Circulation Parking and access lanes have been realigned per City direction to provide lanes parallel to Oakesdale on and direct access to Building B. • Design LManagement Software, Inc. February 8, 1988 Ma. Corey Grieez First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Ms . Oriaez : This letter is in regards to the present parking situation within the Black River Corporate Park. As discussed at the time of the signing of our lease the present parking allotment calls for 5 parking stalls per 1000 square feet. We find that we do need all of this parking allotment and that any variation (with the exception of allowing more parking) would not be adequate . The parking requirements were of prime concern to us when signing our lease. Our two previous locations in the downtown area did not provide adequate parking facilities and thus was partial impetus for us to look in this area for office apace. If these parking requirements do change we would regret that we would be forced to look elsewhere for office space at the expiration of our present lease. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Design Management Software, Inc. Cathy Al •Mills Vice President ELt AVE,S.W. SUITE 102 RENTON,WA 98055 (206)235-1677 �q� qL 941 POW A ELL Corey Grisez First City Equities 800 5th Ave Suite 4170g8104 Seattle, Washington February u8, 1988 Dear Corey, I feel very strongly about our parking. WhenP he our conversation today that lowerewmoo 4 spaces our lease agreement it states that we will receive we signedTo h 5 spaces per thousand square feet. will not be sufficient for our needs. Since we are a Credit Union e have a heavy amount of traffic and need all our spaces. w - Please do what you can to maintain our needs. Sincerely, vv,. Eris P. Sullivan Branch Manager . 't ,iff a rt i `y� k..��, i } S yAA_;;I,. N ... s •�� 1 yyC tom..''�t r'h. $:. 1q l -�, %1"1,, r, 'r, r ,i.� .. '$�a.". �'' Y� #��:^'rig4"•`D`pi,',r�$',{4Yi�?�f{tdi Jr'vs. ' �'•: Y (5 s':.> i`�+ae �jif{,1�?!,'"s�i'C�`r.5r3p° �r t♦+•, z�2 t'�`• r, ;: t ;r. 7, t~••t v�yt'i k �� ^jrti`' s�Arc t &� .•11�t; (n1 C} ��+i,i9 `1 �lt',:1. . 7 .A ors�".�`4 c:': i*� ,}, .r f )` r „e .,k,i C/ h �e:„ _ ist� k1'M`Sr `. ?�"I} / !'S�'yyi.Yrl l.. r * .'1 }{k,Y r73'"} ,,• Rs• I '3';`: { •it _ ''{ .• ` 3r'�}L Y roc �� M9. q.BU �,,II,�yd � �Y N�ivlj t�''��,'�1 s �,ism Y .;, � } t,'Y`•`• c':� :`�,;. C .tn I S' 4%,^' Pyr '1i, ,6,1n $4.v., aY V (y `� � •..wl:+_}Tf 'o• t, 1ig "`j;: t J f # } .Ja 'Lf s{ }vim l +I,i :i .S -• 1••: H i ✓ L"�sc�n�'Pame�cSy Nnrfhwesi.Ptsc,�i�by�nA.��r0,A.I.A:, �477 dine Street,Sulte 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 December 31, 1987 -',-\l'"( (4 1\"))6- Mr. Don Erickson, AICP EXHIBIT Zoning Administrator and _ "" �•O o �7 ; Environmental Review Committeeii. Tqc) 4 J `���'d' 'r City of Renton }� F 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Phases IV and V Files SA-090-87 & SM-013-87 & ECF-078-87 Original Submittal October 13, 1987 ERC letter November 30, 1987 ERC determination of non-significance dated December 21, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: Per review of the ERC's determination of non-significance, we disagree with the conditions and find them "unreasonable and not acceptable." The following comments are submitted for additional information and conjunction with our previous letter dated December 8, 1987. This letter is submitted to ERC for reconsideration prior to final issuance of declaration of non-significance and prior to the appeal period. CONDITION 1 1. Additional drainage swales on this phase of the site are unreasonable and are not required and affect the developable rights of the owner, especially in conjunction with the past approvals and direction by the City of Renton. A. All drainage for this phase of development flows to Oakesdale, to 7th, to Naches and into the existing biofiltering swale and then into the P-1 pond, this is adequate to filter this phase of. development plus additional future phases and the Black River (north half) of the total development. Reference attached letter from Entranco Engineers. Forcing unnecessary additional biofiltering on this phase of development is not necessary. (1) The land for Oakesdale Avenue was dedicated to the City by FCE. (2) The prime participant for the LID for Oakesdale was FCE. (3) The drainage system in the street was designed to service this phase of development and paid for through the LID for Oakesdale. (4) The improvements for storm drainage in the street besides being paid for (majority) by the owner (FCE) are in addition, subject • Page 2 to assessment charges for use, which were appealed and denied by the hearing examiner. FCE paid for the storm line, pays to use the storm line and should be allowed to use the storm line as originally planned, biofiltering of water will occur and will be adequate at Naches without additional biofiltering swales added to this phase. The City itself drains Oakesdale directly into the P-1 Channel with limited biofiltering before entering the P-1 Channel. Why should this development phase be required to do any more than the City requires of itself. The proposal, however does not reflect using direct access to the P-1 Channel for storm drainage, but ties into a biofiltering system planned, programmed and adequate to serve these sites. 2. We request condition 1 be eliminated. CONDITION 2 1. Efforts have already been taken to preserve wildlife habitat and existing significant trees have been preserved to the maximum extent possible. Reference LPN letter dated December 8, 1987, attached. Additional efforts will be made in the SE section of Phase IV, Buildings A and B, to preserve additional trees through a final balance of required parking per building s.f. per the City's definition of gross building area. The planning for this development occurs today in order to develop the property. We see no reason to remove any of the retained trees in the future unless for safety reasons. 2. The use of landscape preserves for reducing parking is a good planning tool for development when the owner has some control on parking and the tenancy in the buildings. In multi-tenant buildings minimizing parking below code and what is acceptable in the market takes the development out of the market. Considering the process it takes to obtain permits and approvals for buildings, this is not a viable option and places an unreasonable restraint on development that is not required by code or ordinance. 3. The LID for Oakesdale had an initial budget of $20,975 for landscaping as established by the City of Renton. This was inadequate to do anything but seed the LID areas. FCE has contributed the difference in costs to establish $170,694 to enhance the landscaping along Oakesdale, on this side of the property, and along the P-1 Channel. This includes three inch caliper trees and irrigation systems. These contribute greatly to enhanced wildlife habitats and has already been planted through the additional efforts and costs of FCE (owner) . 4. We request condition 2 be eliminated as extensive, planning efforts have mitigated and preserved the majority. of on site trees and supplemented the street and P-1 Channel areas (in addition to the proposed landscape concepts submitted) . Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle;WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Page 3 CONDITION 3 1. "Impervious surfaces not be allowed to intrude within the drip line of existing trees," this is an acceptable condition - however in some cases intrusion can be tolerated and needs to be reviewed by landscape architects on an individual basis. CONDITION 4 1. On site amenities are described in the (attached) LPN letter December 8, 1987, item 3 and are acceptable as defined as a condition. Leaving an "open ended" program to "the satisfaction of the city landscape architect" is unreasonable and undefinable. In addition to the items referenced to be provided, shower facilities will be provided in this phase of development. The jogging trail referenced under construction in the letter is being paid for by FCE (owner) above the LID costs and needs to be considered part of this phase of development as an amenity. 2. We request this condition be revised to reflect the items as defined in the LPN letter. CONDITION 5 1. Condition 5 is acceptable, however, oil water separations are already required as a standard by the City of Renton and probably does not have to be included as a condition. Respectfully, N'ARCHI CTS & PLANNERS Ro a A. Ber L PIesident RAB: clp Enclosures: Ltr. Entranco Engineers, December 10, 1987 Ltr. LPN Architects, October 27, 1987, November 3, 1987, December 8, 1987 Ltr. BRH, December 31, 1987 cc: Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Schuman, First City Equities Barbara Moss, First City Equities David Morency, Entranco Engineers Bob Roed, Bush, Roed, & Hitchings Charles Blumenfeld Leason Pomeroy Norlhwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 DEC 31 '87 11:28 BR&H 206 323 7135 P. 1 , BUSH, ROED & rdITCHINGS, INC, 2009 Minor Avenue East " Seattle, Washington 98102 Area 206/ 323-4144 • December 31, 1987 • Royce Berg q C�gII� Leeson Pomeroy Northwest , 1127 Pine, Suite 300 DEC 31 1987 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Blackriver Corp. Park LPN Architects & Planners Storm Drainage Dear Royce: • I am writing this letter to explain the reasons behind the storm drainage system design for that portion of the Blackriver Development within the plat of Washington Technical Center. Basically the plat consists of the property bounded on the east by Powell Avenue, on the south by Grady Way, on the west by Oakesdale Avenue, and extending approximately 600 feet north of SW 7th Street. As directed by the Hearing Examiner's Report and recommendation for the plat approval under file No. PP-056-80, compliance with the conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee was mandatory. Listed below are numbers 5, 6 & 7 of the ERC conditions relating to storm drainage. 5. Dedicate an easement for storm drainage along the north property line from the northeast corner of the site to the Black River channel. 6. Direct all storm drainage from the site east of Springbrook Creek to the upstream end of the old Black River channel for the purpose of wetland treatment (as per the water quality impact assessment). 7. Extend the existing storm sewer line of the site (in a appropriate size) northwestward to the upstream end of the old Black River channel. To comply with the above conditions the following storm drainage network was established. A. Area north of SW 7th Street and east of Powell Avenue SW was designed to discharge directly to an open ditch along the north property line via pipe in Powell Avenue. B. Area north of 7th Street between Neches Avenue and Powell Avenue drainage system discharges partially into the ditch along the north property line and partially into a pipe in Naches which discharges into the above mention ditch. C. Area north of 7th Street between Naches Avenue & P-1 channel to be drained via pipe in 7th Street and Neches to said open ditch on north property line. CIVIL ENGINEERS/LAND SURVEYORS Blackriver Corp. Park December 31, 1987 Page 2 D. Area south of 7th Street between Powell Avenue & Oakesdale Avenue was divided into three major drainage systems. 1. The South one—fourth of the area has to drain to the south because the topographic features made it impossible to drain northerly to the old Black River channel per the ERC condition number 6. 2. The area along Powell Avenue and 7th Street drains to a pipe installed during the first phase of development by the HdK Company. This pipe which is 300 feet west of Powell connects into the pipe installed in 7th Street which in turn connects to the pipe in Naches. 3. Remaining portion of drainage discharges into the storm sewer pipe built as part of the Oakesdale Avenue SW project. This portion of the Oakesdale Avenue system connects into the large 60 inch pipe in Naches Avenue via 7th Street. The surface water runoff collected by the above drainage systems discharge into the old Black River channel per Condition Number 6 imposed on this property by the Environmental Review Committee except that small area lying in the extreme southerly portion of the project. The major purpose for directing the runoff to the upstream and of the old Black River channel via the extension of the existing 60 inch storm sewer line in Naches was to have the surface water runoff flow through the old channel for "wetland treatment" before discharging into the P-1 Channel/Pond drainage system Sinter , 25z52 obert M. oed RMR/scr l ..i t A �A '.'1 'Y ?rtr t r t a 'l .-a ( r , . q• bl Y� E 4, r k: t , i i ,u ,. P`a{6� t' tip ,"t .4:', .t' • R ?; y�r ive Y. ,rd�j{;,F"r b7,'•''• A�, ,q,:sr j,:^"t v� �l r1l' e.°)��yy�"!, fit, Sy `� .,ro;Cr f ,kkr ,il•t 9 , , ;, s .i ��r • •- • e.,) 1i` i),w''T,IWX ) :, T FX u ?,�i )',l i F t"�i fit ,�1 a(':i. 8 3/ ).'N t f;'ar „+i ` . � ) ' ,yry`},7' t �r ,Ki) y � 1 ,tit6r t,� �{� >r� `ti 7 a�y y c,� 4' ' ) f r ? i ''• ). 0„,.,,,,tio ,:,(.' 4Ci1y .Ko� ,ti(Y p ��Y ,1, i4y t !�` ll"SrO p ?yllfgt�n jl ^ y�,A ,,,a ta. 4 r I. t ..in vtf}<�• .41..'�jj�,,�tt -k Airy k L�4 ,,� Ifl� .�1� ,,,,lvt:`j t a. t . . . ,„ „' e,..lL 5i 7 l+bt 3o A1 5'I-�a.7 t fN'4v`> ,014G y'lei.12 f7j1 �t� / t ,, , } - , •+{L A f1 y z.r , P PJk :] y� DFz 'tiltG � �{ 4k5Y :.( 1lR� � rf .�`1' t'•t +• r t � � t , r l) �.r f / V� t i �l i )' 4il t i ?,.; i i i �st+. ,4'{ t'rt " r t' t`�r �'Y ti,�t�' a ` jr" y t4' �t 4 1 4 i7) 7'C i 9 f�t 'ri '.N�.+1.q .4 1„ I�A•tt* i .r 4 r' s '-� y 4. 4 ?htt t7 +{ 1) .<;t t (1p,4 tta.,& ',it t s 'tf ` t G ha'11 4•1• t` ti l l L,,, a t . - i:1‘,'• {i t i . , •try, :� ' 1:61i.Ni'Polliaroy kigitiWatt;IR6,i(160rA,fibtg'A.LA. 112�01ho Street,tulte 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 December 8, 1987 Mr, Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator and Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Phases IV and V Files SA-090-87 & SM-013-87 Original Submitted October 13, 1987 ERC letter November 30, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: The following comments are submitted per your letter of November 30, 1987 as additional information to be included with the ERC Committee's final recommendation to the Hearing Examiner and City Council. We appreciate your comments and in keeping with the phases already established we believe Phases IV and V will also result in the higher quality we seek for the Blackriver Corporate Park development. 1 . Water Quality/Wetlands: Water drainage for these sites will flow to Oakesdale north to 7th, east to Naches, and north to the swale for biofiltering before entering into the P-1 Channel. Per City of Renton direction and per original EIS for property and per storm lines installed in Oakesdale LID by FCE and Renton for this specific purpose. This system has been reviewed in context with the overall development and the existing biofiltering swale off Naches is adequate to accommodate these sites and other areas of the total development. A specific analysis is attached to this letter with a report by the project environmental engineer, David Morency of Entranco Engineers. Oil/water separators will be installed per City standards. (See attached report) 2. Glare: All glass reflects at certain angles of incidence. Bumpers on cars, windshields on cars, also reflect light at times when hit in certain manners. The use of "reflective glass" evolved from the energy crisis this nation entered and provides an efficient means to control heat gain in buildings, which is the dominant use of energy in office buildings (even in the northwest). Phase II on Powell Avenue of this development currently exists with reflective glass elements on three stories of the buildings, 45% outward reflectance) as do other buildings jn the City of Renton with no adverse impacts on the adjacent "micro climate". Mr. Don Erickson Page Two December 8, 1987 There is no inclined reflective glass on this building, all glass is vertical and all reflective glass will be kept at or below the 23% outward reflectance which is the middle of the range. Reflective glass besides having energy efficient aspects also allows a building to change colors and tones depending on the weather and time of day which provides aesthetic value and interest to the building. Reflective glass will not be used at the major entry points to the buildings, tinted vision glass will be used. 3. Recreation: Benches and outdoor seating. The drawings did not reflect amenity areas; the intent was as follows: Phase Four, Bldgs. A & B, 3 Story Office — Two benches and paved sitting areas at each major entry of each building. Two benches and a paved sitting area to be provided at the southeast corner of this phase in the extra landscape area. In addition, raised planter walls will provide seating at the main entry at side. Phase Five, Bldgs. C & D — Two benches and a paved sitting area will be provided at the main plaza between the buildings. Two benches and a paved sitting area will be located in the landscape area along the trees at Oakesdale Avenue. Recreational .activities like jogging will connect within the master plan when all master plan issues are resolved. A master plan concept for these areas was submitted over a year ago to the City but could not be processed by the City. These items will be developed per phase of development. The jogging trail for this phase is under construction west of Oakesdale and paid for by First City Equities in the LID. These • trails ultimately will connect to Blackriver Corporate Park trails and should connect with City trails and other trails to Fort Dent Recreational Park which is within a mile of this phase of development. 4. Retention of Existing Trees As many of the existing trees as possible were saved through our site planning process and were reviewed by which areas of preservation would provide a balance of significant trees to soften the edges of development along the public streetscape and the property boundary lines. In addition 13 small trees will be relocated along the property lines to provide additional mature landscaping. 72% of the existing trees are retained or relocated. In addition, special effort was made by First City Equities to preserve. large trees and adjacent trees in the Soils Conservation fill—setback area (200 ft. into property) when the City of Renton finished excavating the P—i Channel. No require— ments were placed on the City to preserve these trees. In addition new Lemon Pomeroy r Joli iwest.Inc..Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (2O6)583-8030 Mr. Don Erickson Page Three December 8, 1987 trees and plantings are to be installed in the landscape areas which will dramatically increase the number of trees on the site. The following is a tabulation of saved trees. Existing Trees Phase IV Phase V (clusters count as one tree) Preserved: 11 9 (4 are clusters) (6 are clusters) Relocated: 13 • 0 Removed: 9 3 (+ 1 row of deciduous) = 4 % Preserved or Relocated ±73% ±69% Overall Average = ±72% preserved or relocated Per Existing Tree Survey: 46 trees shown (dense hedgerow of smaller deciduous trees running east and west counted as 1 tree) Landscape Open Space: Phase IV 25% Provided Phase V 28% Provided Required 20% It should be noted that Cottonwood trees are messy trees and contaminate the screens of heating and air conditioning units as well as clogging roof drains when left too close to buildings. They also clog catch basins in the streets and parking lots. This is one of the reasons the City of Renton would not allow street trees in the medians when Oakesdale was designed. The roots are close to the surface and ultimately raise paving and invade water, sewer and storm lines. We have complied with recommended mitigation measures and have saved as many trees as possible in areas we feel benefit the development and community the best. There are no requirements which mandate preservation of all trees except FCE preservation areas for the Riparian Forest one half mile to the north of this property and not part of this submittal . We have exceeded the minimum landscape requirement of 20% to 25% at Phase IV, Buildings A and B; and 28% at Phase V, Buildings C and D in order to preserve this amount of trees. Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc..Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 W. Don Erickson Page Four December 8, 1987 5. Access Access to these sites (ingress and egress) are dictated by previous comments in public hearings by the Fire Marshall of the City of Renton, and the Oakesdale LID. Development of Phases I and II provided access points to this phase for emergency vehicle access to Oakesdale from Powell Avenue. The major east—west access aisles reflect this and dictate basic on site circulation. Access to Oakesdale was limited to tie access points shown. We have added one additional curb cut for right in and right out for Buildings A and B. This curb cut aligned further north originally (and can still be an alternate approach, per attached sketch reflecting major on site vehicular lanes) but shifted to the south to avoid relocating a fire hydrant. On site circulation allows north—south access between sites but does not encourage high speed direct lanes (which are not desirable on site). Pedestrian access has been provided between buildings, from buildings to the sidewalks on the street and a major east—west access walk was provided to the adjacent properties and phases into Oakesdale. We see no need for additional walks and prefer to keep as much area in pervious surface and landscaping as possible and maintain rights to develop this property per marketing and allowed use per zoning. Parking amounts meet City code requirements of 1/200 SF of building and provide a reasonable balance of allocation to each building yet providing different exposures for buildings. Respectfully, LPN ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS Ro ce A. Berg, P esident RAB:cpm Enclosures: Ltr. Entranco Engineers Ltr. LPN Architects, October 27, 1987 Ltr. LPN Architects, November 3, 1987 LPN site plan reduction reflecting alternate access point to site cc: Barbara Moss, First City Equities, . Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Schuman, First City Equities I t,rnon Poniorcy Northwest.Inc.,Royce A.Berg.A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street.Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583 8030 ENTRANCO ENGINEERS,INC. LAKE WASHINGTON PARK BUILDING 120610274300 5800 LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E., KIRKLAND,WA 98033 December 10, 1981 Barbara Moss, Director of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: Phase 4 and 5 Development, Area 2 Treatment of Stormwater Runoff Black River'Corporate Park Entranco Project No. 87116-60 Dear Barbara: The purpose of this correspondence is to provide an evaluation of the probable water quality treatment effectiveness of the present storm drainage plan for the Black River Corporate Park (refer to the recently revised plan dated 12/10/87, enclosed) . The new plan would involve the construction of approximately 4,100 feet of drainage swales or biofilters for the treatment of stormwater runoff. The value of these areas as wildlife habitat is also addressed in this letter. In order to simplify the discussion of these issues I have divided the site into five major drainage areas and have numbered them accordingly (refer to enclosed drainage plans) . Please note that whenever I refer to the "EIS" in this discussion I am referring to the water quality appendices of the Earlington Park (1981) and Black River Office Park (1982) Final EISs where the original stormwater treatment concept was presented. In my opinion, effective stormwater treatment will be provided for all areas of the site except for Area 3 and some runoff from S.W. 0akesdale Avenue that will drain directly into Springbrook Creek and the P-1 Pond without treatment. The absence of stormwater treatment in Area 3 could be addressed by providing additional open swale (biofilter) drainage to replace underground storm drains. However, it should be noted that. in the original EIS it was assumed that no treatment would be provided for this area. It was also assumed that the relatively small amount of untreated runoff from this area would not have any significant adverse impact on water quality in the P-1 Pond - in part due to the small volume of runoff compared to total flows in Springbrook Creek (i .e. , due to the benefit of dilution) , and in part because existing water quality in Springbrook Creek is already significantly degraded. The provision of approximately 2,100 feet of biofilter swale area for Area 1 runoff will represent a significant improvement in stormwater treatment compared to the original EIS drainage plan. In the original EIS it was assumed that runoff from this area would be treated in the old Black River Channel wetlands along with other site runoff. EVERETT OFFICE 516 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING I2001258-6202 1602 HEWITT AVENUE.EVERETT.WA 98201 . Ms. Barbara Moss December 10, 1987 Page 2 Assuming that the width of the biofilter swale will vary from 20 to 40 feet, the total amount of new treatment area will be about 1 to 2 acres. On the basis of design criteria employed in the original EIS, this amount of wetland area should be more than sufficient to remove pollutant fractions associated with particles of 43 microns or greater. This means that pollutant removal rates should be in the range of 60 to 90 percent for most. pollutants (refer to Tables 1 and 2) . [It should be noted that a basic premise of the design approach is to provide sufficient sedimentation ( treatment) area to treat the 1- to 2-year design storm and that storms of greater magnitude and lower return frequency (e.g., once in 5 or more years) would receive lower treatment.] The location of these biofilter swales will be along the margin of the riparian forest preserve, as shown in the enclosed drainage plan. This location will promote groundwater recharge of stormwater runoff and will also make it possible to divert overflow runoff into the riparian forest area. Groundwater recharge and surface water diversion through the riparian forest should assist in preserving the forest habitat and may even result in the creation of a more definitive wetland habitat. However, care should be taken in the design of drainage facilities in this area so that overflow runoff is routed into and through the riparian forest in such a manner as to avoid channelization of flow and creation of erosion and sedimentation problems in the P-1 pond. Drainage control in Area 2 has been affected by loss of old Black River Channel wetlands, as previously mentioned. One out of the three original acres of wetland was lost during construction of the P-1 Pond, and another acre will be filled by First City Equities in conjunction with construction of buildings and parking areas. The latter filling by First City Equities will occur in a manner consistent with the plan that was approved in the original EIS. Although this loss of wetland area will result in some reduction in treatment efficiency, the remaining wetland area is still sufficient to provide an adequate degree of stormwater treatment. On the basis of the original ' EIS stormwater treatment criteria, I have determined that adequate treatment area is available to remove the 40-micron particle size and larger, providing 60 to 90 percent pollutant removal efficiencies for most pollutants. Again, I refer you to Tables 1 and 2 as the basis for these criteria. This analysis included treatment of off-site runoff that is conveyed to the old Black River Channel via the existing 60-inch storm drain. On the basis of Table 1 criteria, 145 square feet of sedimentation area is required per cfs of flow to remove particle fractions of the 40-micron size and greater. For the 110 cfs flow originally calculated in the EIS, this computes to approximately 16,000 square feet. On the basis of these criteria, the one acre (43,560 square feet) of remaining wetlands should provide adequate stormwater treatment. In order for treatment to be provided effectively, however, I .recommend Ms. Barbara Moss December 10, 1987 Page 3 that a gabion-type structure be located at the outlet of the old Black River Channel where it discharges into the P-1 Pond. This will have the effect of creating standing water conditions behind (upstream of) the gabion and increasing the surface area and effectiveness of wetland treatment contact. Other factors tending to enhance treatment in the remaining wetland area include: (1) a reduction in the total volume of runoff that will be treated in this area (a significant volume of runoff will be treated within Area 1 and will not be routed to the old Black River Channel wetlands as originally planned); and (2) additional treatment area (1,500 feet x 20 feet) that will be provided in the form of new biofilter drainage swales located east of Nachess Avenue S.W. (about 750 feet of this swale has already been constructed) . Stormwater runoff from Areas 4 and 5 will also discharge to biofilter swales and will receive adequate treatment. In summary, I find that the presently proposed storm drainage plan will actually result in enhanced treatment of stormwater runoff from the Black River Corporate Park as compared to the plan originally proposed in the EIS. Adequate treatment will also be provided for off-site runoff, and I do not anticipate any significant increases in pollutant concentrations in Springbrook Creek or the P-1 Pond as a result of development of the site as proposed. Sincerely, ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC. ('l tilaltcc ( a yr David A. Morency Associate DAM:gg Enclosures • Entranco Engineers, Inc. December 10, 1987 TABLE 1 Minimum Sediment Basin Area Requirements for Selected Particles (per cfs Outflow Rate) Particle Minimum Area Kind of Diameter Required Material (micron) (sq. ft.) Coarse sand 1,000 3.0 Coarse sand 200 14.5 Fine sand 100 38.2 Fine sand 60 80.0 Fine sand 40 145.0 Silt 10. 2,030.0 Coarse clay 1 203,000.0 Fine clay 0.1 20,300,000.0 Source: American Public Works Association, 1974. Practices in Detention of Urban Stormwater Runoff. Special Report No. 43. Entranco Engineers, Inc. December 10, 1987 TABLE 2 Fraction of Pollutant Associated with each Particle Size Range (Percent by Weight) PARTICLE SIZE (u) 2,000 840 -> 2,000 246 -> 840 104 -> 246 43 -> 104 <43 Total Solids 24.4 7.6 24.6 27.8 9.7 5.9 Volatile Solids 11.0 17.4 12.0 16.1 17.9 25.6 B0D5 7.4 20.1 15.7 15.2 17.3 24.3 COD 2.4 4.5 13.0 12.4 45.0 22.7 Kjeldahl Nitrogen 9.9 11.6 20.0 20.2 19.6 18.7 Nitrates 8.6 6.5 7.9 16.7 28.4 31.9 Phosphates 0 0.9 6.9 6.4 29.6 56.2 Total Heavy Metals 16.3 17.5 14.9 23.5 27.8 Total Pesticides 0 16.0 26.5 25.8 31.7 Source: U.S. EPA, 1972. Water Pollution Aspects of Street Surface EPA- Contaminants, EPA-R2-72-081. RAROAD TI*CNt I•IILW......U.•WI•wy ............... MACNSS AYL -SW•. ", BLACKR! R CORPORATE PARK ••,•••*••' 1 (SLAG RIYLR OFFICE PARS) \1 ......... !'�`�i� ••:•/••,t `••, BIOFILTER SWALE (TYPJ �r ,,,•••••. '� I`I q•ANSA r PUSLICAtt.!NATURAL �..•__,,• 4.•/ t ,I \•,•,o,%, /(- 0 0 .: i ' .� n 1 .,/I OM - F-1 POND ..rtt•� QV .�!i//�i I%//i�11�i�.. .-__ •A 'u. r�u.. ••h•••• / 4-PUMP STATION ••••,',�.. •.�,.,,, ,! , ••a •. _- .�� rne .•`/ 's` 'BLACKMER COR• •• •TE PARK/' MI • ?\/ 1 - / (YALLlT 401 IUSIN •PARS 1 ' 3 l i 2 J l- O \` / . SW 714 • OA t- - .�, FLOW (TYPJI DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY (TYP.) s ? s • z ; T. 2 • -- ; Y • STORM DRAINAGE BLACKRIVER s iri' Corporate Park i ` , 1 1OTI1 SS. 5 . RD(TON.WASISNOTON 1 \ •~ 1011°` . i NORTH ' ° 0,0 12-10-87 yp +.,, , {y., "u e r• r: tr ►. i d a'a 4l,yfi„!t+ + ` , 5 - + .I r ,{ tt , '1�'k7f'l�'{ct .tf���'I' �•A 1f �: - � �:.�:.'•'t1R':l ,Y�y' t {.y5jjljl+i ' 1 �,,� t ; . . 1 '�- 74 �.P � �itdl 4 '�,5: t { /a}'•, �.,y ' F' • L 4 '`:L:• �i V�. �1'¢''.•�N . 9'y.�- �.,'��,.• r4;r+s'•{j�,1 , , �7 • •; -- ,• - 3 •�.tt W *�,..t .�' ;41 tp:Z` .1���M+ I(tylfi o ,;,. t, �, t;t� ,� {t t:Nt7�.�. � L y 4��/!•t �:.. wLi�. '�'f 1 tii,�,t i r F 1 r .: ,i F. , ,<)f, 5H' °y ti�"i4tt¢i.Z.C�>J its-+ t ., �Y ay�. .n�{ [�1,+ .S>> ,7 ` ' • LBAsbf Pornol6Y iNle►Ihwe!!,Ina•r Mixe A.B!,rC,Al.A:. 41,1 line titnnI.non 3nn 5ecdllr•,Wn nn in 1'O'.1(,n3 of..1r) November 3, 1987 • ENA COURIERS • Mr. Jerry Lind Planning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Phase IV and Phase V — Drainage Site Approval Submittal — SA-090-87 Environmental Checklist — ECF-078-87 Shoreline Permit — SM-018-87 Dear Jerry: Per your conversation with Barbara Moss regarding the conflict in the Environmental Checklist and drainage drawing, the checklist is correct. All drainage for the Phases IV and V sites will go north — into Oakesdale. 7th, and Naches respectively and biofiltered in an open. swale before entering the P-1 Pond. Attached is a revised print reflecting the grading and a revised reduction of the grading for your use. Respectfully, 4ea4 • A. Berg dent RAB:cpm Enclosure cc: Barbara Moss . Mark Miller David Schuman • Ken Chin I • f. 1 _� 1" ' = • / i� , ,' b n 1 �.n1V 1 \ II ; I o I I Y.'.‘° .:: --- A:' l 1 ' a asp,..•.a 1 ?tI!!c:E� 1I lI 111 1l61' ' G' e` f,s i ``iuiiraer esin lia, r16:12.'3iI6" i 7 lb... . 1\ .\:\., . 1! . , 1 C.° 0 2 73 • \ ‘.,1441, . ___,. "' ° 0 71111k le:. ,-,7 . I \ \ . 0 • 1i1� � t ,� I ;5 a \, !i d �Aga�. c a d " , a t.17 R J ' First City Equities I !.. 3 , y. .BlackRlver Corporate Park P t; ;; f eq 4 .° ' PHAS• Renton,We V& ngton 4'e t k ?:11.! firs i.[ . Jj ; _.4 '''`'1% t f. `I:.,1%,J71•4•;.,1 Li, ;F'4,,, t 1. 7 ,3,f C,4;•f{ ,f\el,j1 tt:4�k�i. 1 t... ,,,• �i .-,`i 4 rr,- :it. . t ^fjt' zi 9 d, t ) t4+ng Y;,. 11Y*i� ,,Ye:4N!�gl'. ,1 yak .,,AP V,,,'+ i'.' i U t .� ,.. I. y,�1 �/�4�,/� 'k .0 t3'f.t ..I„R I� Y. TuraY manni, �.•y�.. 2„ ,q ,rtt.�Mi;F�1rtt i 1 7 i. :•x ky t, i ' "7: �4,q:z' .1l' +taiv`t1`.i 41 tia ...01.y.&; }?# riit Irt{� •11. ,'ir7•.. Y3:� f1�"' � is 7;1 ca�7i.rti ' �' ,(='y ��»k.(�S�Y�i��.l 1,� �l tr 1 } t , >') re tit t _4).t q 7.k to 7,4 ; ' '4'. f,r } . V• '' ` . • •,' •' 1. t t � �, v � r ilv.. ti 'i • , " Leason Pomeroy Northwest.Inc.,Royce A:.8erg.A.I.A..,1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seatlte.WA 98101(206)583.8030 FIRST CITY EQUITIES October 27, 1987 OCT 2 8 1987 Mr. Jerry Lind Department of Building & Zoning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase IV and V Site Plan Review (No. SA-090-87), Landscape Requirements Dear Jerry: Pursuant to the Renton Building Regulations, Section 4-718(C)5,c, requiring a minimum of 20% of the site to be retained in landscaped open spaces, our current proposed landscaped open spaces are: 1. Phase IV: + 100,770 S.F. = 25% 2. Phase V: + 54,450 S.F. = 28% The above areas are exclusive of all proposed walks and paved areas, and exceed the 20% required areas. Final drawings will vary in amounts but will be over 20%. . Please do not hesitate to call if there are any questions. Si erel ( W4 ,.�- Y Ken K. Chin, AIA YKKC:cpm cc: Barbara Moss Mark Miller ' I•'. '..'" . •rr t.,_.-Irn'' - -.." ' '1.:•'.'4.4.` 1:11'. 5i: ::1': C':t. .1 : ... .. ''......-i• ..':''r':OV.trt.so Ammitem.,_ IMr!!,;:r. • IL • ,:. 1' •.'• 7.. • • . . • .• J•r`i • - z.. ,, . 3, ... ..., 1441!•:i :;,.!::•", . . , ...:,: .1;•1 ,• - ...., .. • ' , .. ,. .• ,,:t• ,•::•4, !...,..;. • .. 1,t."ki.r. • ..- •-r.t CI li'-•.; -2-."; ..e ' , .. .. •• - ..t.• • • • . . • -• •••./ .. nip !. i ...: , 1 c ,,.., " .. .0 • ....... • ,,, ,;...4,.•..i.: 11 1 . ., . 11.•:,. . .? 01 Din 0 li irli!,:r,..,::...,. ....:..... 2 .,... ,\., $, ....,,.,..„. 11 Ea NOW t:.'••• \. .i Iii .,.1 0 •7••• . %. ell. 1 . 4 LEg ) V"' A I •,,144 gli• !.7,•;: . i ;, 1 • 7 . . . . :I f:!r• . I . ". % g i,,,,vs. 1 ,,\,,,,.. • i . rb* • A . 'ig 1 ,!!.1;•. ••••.04'^-- 1. a • •' 44 i . • • • •• 1 .,•41 AK • 1 1 , .4.4; 4 •• ••• '•' • ,' •• . t I 0 1 43 2i1. .• :•''....;', '..1.• :• . '..:;•;," t •°ft ' 1 .4.• f4-.) • 4\‘' ,s'.4• I .--, •;. Alf • 4 44,, ` t.et Ai i :i 10". ".• I t , id i(7/di rii. 1/4 Ill‘ 1 1. 1 .• . 1. "1" II lit 1.\ - - 1). • -i: .1 N. \ .1 1 Na 1 ! ,ii• go . • f.A406,10 . ".:.:v: -4 \ 1 ss .....1 .1.: ...). f;* ,• j!it.N.r.1 ‘‘‘ ss• ,, I . T.11,1/'\ --- ;-;-F.14 1 -1 . ..... ... . Pd . ..: I ' ,:. . . ll ..,1 , '.. ; it- .?...• , .•,,, • •,.. . ,,,. tor,, • • i: ,, • ..A • ••• V • ‘1;:::, i • \ . \\ v,.. _ i ,.., s. 1 ... . •l'•-• .1. . - -0.e•'.. ,. :.i.. .11 .:.,..1.1-. II ....-.... e4 .,‘ ,,,,. :,..).,... . • \ e' k • . • .;r4 . . •t '4 :1:-"•••••••"" • • • '•• tII::"• . ''''- 1 Illi.......- . . . 4,......- II r I '! , •• . 3.: •, il 2::. - . K''.1 ; i1 I> . A. A g . • . •>:,..,., \ 41/4 i vt 9 ii 1,1 b . I.; mi• • - • 1-` I• ... ...••••111/ OA 1:•ti.'. 1% Vil '. _ • ) . ..:„..-------- . rt4 F I ' Ili. °. t. 11 il 1 I . :i:,....: •UV • a .. \ .. , .44 ‘i ICA tO • • el 1.. '•Va.It 1111.1!, 1 . •q< . \ ....\' `.7'. • ' '51,,..:"‘. I .. m % -:: t.. . tt------ • -----7-1 •, . t '10. P s,..c.c .. ,.., N• ... ,„ • t 11, .. - .--'- -,-._ -24.3- , . ... - t •,,...1t,.... , , 1,,,t44.,.,:Atic\v.,V\ I 4, • i . ,, .. st .4/ • 1: i • , • -_ : i •it ..: :. ••• .. .„ • „ziA,,,,,, ,.--, . . Hi. , „ I -4 - t I i • i '.;.‘, °_ _4....." I---A 17--I • 1 \ r . ..".illi, . 1 . . \\_, Tv, two; • ,i_ it :, 11 ; . .. \ ... . -1--- 0 . :. ' •A filli 7 1 / I •,;',11 2-,•3 1 $ 1,17/g if,4)) .t/4.• . :.4:i 1.. 1_ii tilliq 1 :tt; le (6\ rIrill g ,..., . . - : •:. • 1-1, I ;,‘ IC* --""----- It a lie-_ 7: 1 I . . : . ••'' • • . • Ili 1 .. ist tik -4 P.rpli illiiiii - i ji • 1 1 1/41i '• _ - % 0, ... .... ---, fzi..... I iill ildill 2 • 1 i 1 p . - 1; mi.,1 • 1 at, g •14,ii&f , t 1 P,11 It -.;• • q•,.; i,i „. . 9 :!. :"• . !.; • t• . - l' = •••4. a .4 'Val #o ' 'I 74'....'.1t.,4 ni • !'.••••• !....1,1-.... ,4:4'... • •. • ',,\VI' • _. i 1' ammonia. . ':I .!, . :.; ,,l I :••' ..Vi. ....w=4 .tell_, . ...,,,__IL,th „..i. • ..:2,-,i;..... .,.;l•i 4 i:: „ 77‘.1.10r•••4..,cr-1, ''.• -•,.. 47.-7-irri iii • la •;.• i'. .' .r;,..,','. •*'' ;•':. 4.4. ..•!. !..• 1. ki, •,,, 1-!..x.1 .1,•„,.. , •,:c; .. .,. • ••. •,. .;:,. . .• • t,. & • . _ • L 1... .......•A ag til :: .. g.'.%0F1 i II • 1 arl, ',': ' ,:' t.`,..;;. ',. . •••'',.!.' ' :' I .011 „ i „ ••• ;o IM11111.41' trii1 -I i 1111 , ill 1 4 • •I • , L`,I'• T ''''.1,:r .... ,, ..." •;••I .. ! \ :W. 1 1 II •*.I.•''s' •' • •Ii- . : , i \ tioi -. - \ . ..•.....i ! ..* ' I g..',1.. 1 Viit, k X: • I X XI :•,:- ,. : ..i': , !.. r.-----'‘'...) ANY. „. 11111411"rl,..iiW" " 1 .4 I 471 g .1 ..., A1 ?c,3 )1.1. - ...,.:• ":: :.. --op \ trtikr..--- 1,:t..1:!..ta,\,,, _.. , _:. AI. z 0-0 .: • dr-7"r ,k t? 4, .,, • • . -: _ ) ...,... . . . . Op. al 1 xs ;• ••• • A : \ - \ • . v„, .4.14,-..w.SVM,-. ei :-: - Ir. ' I-8S P •= . / 111 ::, ... -,:,. ...., i 1 .3 M4,41 • ':;... :.. '!'4.' .? t& .-.100+•• e- 1 . . "1i 13 "le • 11 1 ›, rn- •• l% I 11 tikl-'...-:31%:: 1:••1 .;-• .‘ 4\.. ,:alk-Th° ‘11, -3 . I/ 4.: 100/1111111101f :::' IL Or* •-.,, oo ,., „, go •...., • . ..!;- • 4 I I • 1,• .. „... . 'ill°%'4 . IL\ -.• , 5R 711 : t i \ --; .r. ..'7.-- i 1 1 -(4 ,.... , ra • ... 1. • Oh li i• iii if ;• II i EN 11 i '.•. 1 1 il i I. 1 -1 vlit 1 .11? 1 g 1 tiiii " It14.4: <n II, 1 i +4 ? i I i• . ... P i W r /HT 0 i k k•,. 1 ; i 1 i I i•-.: r• P tkat .. • i i I li a 1..t. . . i 1 4 a V • L 4.; • • . „ \kir I 1 2 ..,-`. - :•:,'1- First City Equities I lil " - BlackrIver Corporate Park t ..):.,:,",-. - :•:?!•Lt:' PHASE IV& V .... i ' .1 •.•••‘', •..-'' R41/11041.was/11,19ton a a .3 .,: ;':,.; • • ,•••': •s•r, A .. ..... .„ -.! :' , •• •• • . • ... • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL 3E HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON FEBRUARY 16 , 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASE IV & V Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74 , 000 sq. ft. each and- for two one-story buildings having 30, 750 sq. ft. and 19, 600 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-i channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. File Nos. ECF-078-87; SA-090-87; SM-013-87. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 16 , 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : FEBRUARY 5, 1988 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I• HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN 'r'=t' ;'.CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing °.n , on the day of SIGNED: #214 TABULATION BLDGS A 3 B BLDGS C S D PHASE IV PHASE V Site Area ±403,084 S.F. ±194,477 S.F. Building Area - ±148,000 S.F. ± 50,350 S.F. Building Footprint ± 47,000 S.F. ± 50,350 S.F. Site Coverage ±11.7% ±25.9% Grose Coverage ±38.7% ±25.9% ,2 - Parking �[ o.l vev Lawcsc.7r 41 Standard ±467 Stab ±174 Slab • Compact ±105 Sfax(29%) ±61 Stab(25%) Ca 1K.tee.ec corn' Handicapped ±10 Slab ±4 Stab Q. --w'ai--ekuc1°c E 2.I•t,,y42Y p'.� TOTAL 2672 Stab(1/220.doss) ±239 Stab(1/211,Gross) Y. I �o'i..'m,."``v ' �rm>n.,wcoo �cfso,,ar ; Reasrved ±22 Stab 1 TOTAL ±694 Stab(1/213,doss) It Of 14'2. W 451).00' _ ,4t�"i"�" , _ '—.1.—.cm 1 s,1 T.—Existing Phase I, [I I-•Existing Phase I--y 4.4 Existing I s 111 1CO Building II- nm�,..ee ' �� ) 60,`,4• • s2ano' li v r/ �_ :v.:a1..Tm s+l-�► I3 i ` - 1 - -- %/---��Il,l._----• I ryzpc.aly u� 0 - rao 1 , a J1 ,r m.,c.o • 5cImo F4 0 .1. 1 . ,.0 � � I III 4 i(—PNnca u.e V Existing Banding ,I °Y I I i`..,Tm. IJC j- D Ii_.: 'f-- /^i.` yBWIdExis� ;'1 - -1\ : ci $ 4 ,A•' 15T0,ir n 6° IRT.'OP_.iD_WG m W 6y C 9 `\. iJ°,756 9F. 'z1B,60p S.F,, TREE n mnIp \%!,' " FF.11.5 a FF.,7A. I ie I; �¢+b�.tC I L am. aq' ,p W N!- �ri'F" >,s��W!!��2.74 i �'� - �_�- ; 44EM c-,._We' `V Q Wyc�.-.rT* ac'.,K-c5 wb A`�� _--r._ ` m]i - oa T� s �. r 'ENE,-76.E,.F��NQ , (■1.- L, T" � �—i 5 ___ _.r ds, '`-- n 'Tf�� n� $ II -4-1442 7: -'a:ace ., (P ---;,-1"' ilLaimail �' r, .f - ....,...„ lir ... I . i moonsmoLc-.-•.. ..-42 • • ]9Tdir aFFKE ` 1 I* -Er t-w c.•µ c ri. •"\� \•74,OD9yt'' ` r $ , 1 `j. . (lam) 1G'*•,a�--vd i`. _`..z 1 sd yys�`` '�i I,»e k�, ' �� '.o . ,_/• At _s,? •c•-s-c¢arc r...cis -Ilur \ Ke w.r`. , 4.... $ ,.'w°wadc b � ae'.qe n'r6r ..coo °.n �'•� ..-P' °� I .�.v 1 I — °- ��tOJ LQ� oescwr,°n 110 - 13GT134c12304 C...vIr.LT _/ 's . a, �4`Mnm T/P,) •j(y ••� .! '� % 3.18'Cx.GlpuouS 3, d• I T1w Cued - Z MW-,Y/Q CLJG-E+1r ISS • /•tq, 1T•" 4:of R.o vooq�� \ 4 \— 12'ccrao 1as Y�} s's a .Iz - . . ,•�• 0• `[m G2Ki� Jrs�EQ cGc,D. _ r4'OCG,O�a15 -1S 1". ' �L's-1o'sorro�...1. 72•riW-64(5-d>en'T0ee� {� \\�q. �1, � ,aj"• • �eCST.JG F1N4 H1'DW+JI-'(xP) E.ecc 51`T ., Yam\ 4. O• G-11 ..4 w dra fa't 1..•o.e.,Pl SYMBOLS ♦.r.:� /N-04c.=.cas P-1 Channel • .c.r."-aegis ro es Wresaveo n-47.50 � \`• \ / ,/ee co-ovWmD • e±5I,5Ys-R s aG?at6..rro ,� �' •"o`W .1 } a°3TIJGTF�c5'a ec ot,-',.vn -7 _ •r - D4.wwtic ( - /x' .1Rs-+,ow,tr CO / — ce.-n--qa C..00.' ._r _ BLACKRIVER f__ SUE PLAN - CORPORATE PARKri °n'" :` ( FIRSTRENT N WASHINGTON FIRST CITY EQUITIES E REVISED, FEB.'88 sITE sv�ty Ae° Wan e°d AWE 91of _.. Sr r.T�;1'aA nr' ,,.ifc, � i'h h,n.044' ^ ., ,r- _ _ , . ' § " Arthite6Aire ar d Pk:thhing �'F • P!Pomerayrthwe:tInc,..royce A.Berg,A,I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 • EXHIBIT NO. ,: . �;� February 12, 1988 ; ITEM NO. ,ice a 090 e9r Mr. Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator and Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Phases IV and V Files SA-090-87, SM-013-87, and ECF-078-87 Original Submittal October 13, 1987 ERC letter November 30, 1987 ERC Determination of Non—Significance dated December 21, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: Significant Tree Preservation Per review of staff comments and review with yourself we have revised the site plan to save seven (7) additional large, significant cottonwood trees at Phase IV — 30", 26", 20", 20", 12", 15" and 22"; and at Phase V a 30" cottonwood. This revises the tabulation from 73% of the trees originally preserved to 92% of trees preserved for Phase IV and from 69% to 75% of the trees preserved at Phase V. In order to do this, parking areas have been placed in reserve as landscape areas per City direction. Reclaiming these parking stalls would not remove any significant trees in the future. Reducing parking substantially further than this would greatly hinder the marketing efforts for leasing the buildings. Reference attached letters from existing tenants. Circulation Parking and access lanes have been realigned per City direction to provide lanes parallel to Oakesdale on and direct access to Building B. , Mr. Don Erickson, AICP Page Two February 12, 1988 Pedestrian Access Additional pedestrian access lanes have been provided to Building B to tie to Buildings C and D and 0akesdale. Curb Cut — Access Aisles Curb cuts will be designed to a 30 foot width or per City standards. Recreational Amenities Recreational amenities include adding a horse shoe court in a large landscaped area and adding a par exercise station along the jogging trail path paid for by First City along the P-1 Channel, which will relate to the master plan concept. Shower facilities will be provided in Phase IV and Phase V for employee use. Benches and seating areas will be provided. Grading and Drainage The exhibit for grading and drainage is not current. The revised exhibit was forwarded to the City November 3, 1987 and is attached in this exhibit package with the cover letter as forwarded to the City. Respectfully, LPN ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 11/ Roy• - L . :erg Pr_.ident RAB:cpm Enclosures: Site Plan and Reduction Letters — tenants Phase I and II, Blackriver Corporate Park cc: Barbara Moss Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 VICINITY MAP 1° LEGAL DESCRIPTION TABULATION BLDGS A&B BLDGS C&D - , :z yb M „, :r °..r"I°'°" PHASE IV PHASE V I I f I I ILL_ �, y�• a IIN �' " Ye Site Area ±403,084 S.F. -1194,477 S.F. s ci 1: ,I. _' Building Area ±148,000 S.F. ± 50,350 S.F. J yl ' ';'i} T, Building Footprint _ 47,000 S.F. 50,350 S.F. :or.AayN P, �x �° Site Coverage ±11.7% ±25.9% xaah4e a.4.s. ; ",� ° Gross Coverage ±36.7% ±25.9% : Jy� : r I I '' PHASE N l PHASE V- i '-b .� •. LLLJJJ -- J In -I -- NH,:.... ±166�,,``, arse vnu,tiL FldoaPI40ii:'%�w- _ ±207 (30%) ± (24%) 03 ' 200•TYPICAL .,....,..'7:"..... : °`"'`'`•`° Parking - ,yp I '°�+°^°a o:�':a Q Standard ±473 Stalls Stalls L 5 Compact Stalls ± 55 Stalls a a r.i-'1f• r•.,.'--, �"' >,. E Handicapped ± 10 Stalls 4 Stalls C1 `i„ e\; SHORELINE _1.NC,8Y ''4' ,?,p, ,4,corr wruu- 2.IV,IV. n•col-roduxw to 1¢^ TOTAL ±690 Stalls(1/200 S.F. ±225 Stalls (1/200 S.F. 1i DESIGNATION ate.u. t� �L ( e go I ED 0E Duo.S at 93,5%EfOcency) at 89,8%Efficency) att"- Qu '41 r—r+rdrd A.^ �� �4' ai=Pv�`ry'-- , -- 4`.E 0 ) �" �,y .•"yr�r i� 'S Ot°14'28•w 459.00s p +/ Mom. r i,4• / �.v 4„ /I Existing Phase 11 r -- ExistingPhase I rroN„..0 I 9 J Eitl9 5 r;l�, al m"' ==;trxr�m' f�- �- -- --�--�- O '�• �. ..r=° �� IJ.LJ ,,,,,,,,.,, 2;_�1mot_ �'.� •r-Iw.,,,„,��1 I I R-ci'sizx wJeCL ,41e II C' _ — 2+'cuTn Nw uu 5 E ccuE a:' a +I I tr�a a I 'I a-ova a'F� v p: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I_ 0 II a ))lI zi ., 1aa' h@or=Dyne- e Existing Building m -' ez 19 re. I C _ • (2�) ie A Ca P Existing 3 1 I 2WP cNvr+.frtIr !c ,vt i•'4I 1 STORY R&e 1 STODRY 118 p I TREES bLI£ ,���,. V'/ >.5 • °a ' Y ; Building •emi ` ` ��••.Z:•;( 9e , I ±30,]50 S.F. ±19,600 SF, = •cr L N 1 �{1 L�g v e.1 _5 �J 8a1111 dTREES ] p /.-7.es-VAceeTo0 rz °t `` .,. ' ZED vLA]n12'DECOLICLIS 2.22.. I ,<T I.. v e i ..1P 1 j 01 52 to , ii, fa1n6E LILJ6-4 11 _ ZO.OU.� d� -LCI}WVEI�_ - ---TUFY3�Ttrnu�r s- - yt-- �,'-J - _ - -,° - - --- -- --- r --- 1 - ; �t--- ;�ir.�o i - m�eam Porn, --- \ s a 5 G 1 -19i P 0At F n+4E CN.r ) ] t:yk/ :0 �}'- I \ 1 G+✓-ESb,LE L.I.D. P- .f,f! ":@.1' is K I 1 Or htE�ITOu ANDS ♦♦ 2'Li' I -rr LJe CdJkir2s T1 1 `(„ ! 3 STORY OFFICES ' �"g'- Th. T Iv WI•e c-, REl1.cn=�. I�:Ce � � V� ♦ ,, -PdkL� .0O9.6F�^ .\ -7 a�-1 - Tor S.y,� - E 3+7d Pon�$04e ASLy�1,2. (.1.4k.TYP)eEr LEJ.44ES,— ` \ � D 4 O. 4, ` ;. ., JI..,Jr � co'a.l...r DFc.0„.....,,,.. DLLc� same wit 93+0+(20e)SH7 SCJ1 X'' c (\ ` ' ', 0 ' �. e'+� a"F w.�Swnlz..'E rr�� :i • ..1J ,Ld�' 2e•,Ln;3la'ccmli x, No .. Y DESCRIPTION .TE • ,S i�/ ! FEvccn�' \VI �'' �^- 0� K cmr 4u¢Irr.L. rB7 FJETECR'R OIEGK V,1-.7 , ' '' . (v(YM6L TyP.) . , rim • r 2 1-�✓.H'TFIr I,E CJ.I K.TC•F "LO ♦ \.. to 1101 — /.O 2 --e3 flgl ' t� '® • L <a- VKE, LSTER la'TRe - 22'OECID DECIDUOUS /�.,r.\ � 5-Iv'unTc.uwcces T2'GLIJGTEI'1(S-b'bl2'TREES� ,p- 4id CCSTNG FINE NYDRAAIr-(T/P) � � "V:i `,.).2M IDEw.LK SYMBOLS 1/44 T'�p ar c+.KctD.L.E L.�.o.rxo l tL"tEC.louoLx_ P-1 Channel • E.rrn.ry Tam.=sue zsR.Etz�,;D \�R also 9F'coroNlwcor, O E,(IyriNCs TI+EES TO eC.ffELIYATED \ \ / / ,a + E%ie1,1CC+W.E.�Tb CE i,EMo✓E., r� IT''"`3ldLEwAUC , • /X\ 'DL11'e n p4-n,01un • , Q PIRE-NYG(y.Jr lr�� E I r 1"( CETk]%-RJI.1 CME K wLT . RIVER,,-"' 1A " EARL . TQ 1 ui I 'el CT[Y, -- i?— 5'i93 ANT BLACK RIVER ri i di .I LL P SITE PLAN Building s1 f CORPORATE PARKNORTH i; w I frsrc ;e 9 �I �1 o Belding m �(tr: .�.�, �;I , ,� I = � PORAT 30• al o , ' a.', v "j° \ I RENTON WASHINGTON 30• c al —s L1 4 i t..., A P20J E£T 1 ' FIRST CITY EQUITIES �L.\ / Loc4�loN 10' -_ ----- ` Existin9G Grade .aNKfY �b romms,,r`ry 11�>v�vwvr n lN°oucemAP.BersiI.Nw w rit P-1 Channel ,<"L . o c s Ye . ++2) Plne Steel:Suite 300 25 SOf 100 k ��` seoma,wnve+e+Roelss e9 o PHASE IV&V �I r, _ -,-. SITE PLAN ea Noy a�, SHEET No of s DRAW �R 1 of 7 SITE SECTION A 1•-too' VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES CHECK.-rKC.. L a al Am Ax. 1i.14r1tk111a41, I.ca'41.111P•!-T:-•ar 5 -, Ny �'I,„ 9 yy a)od w q B -.marr Ej1 L, ak4617,6 N , !l q . la Q i 0 ai � r �3 rmNC W - \ e VNc {� ' C � r � f LWae G -'- itaroge ,rooit • ...:. , .1,.,=‘, \ \-------77100-06 -77.7:1111°4ettr4-7:4A:*-01 .0•"1-. 2., \ 044 -a ''''\\ '' ' dik; ''.4'''. A s---.11:-._. -...-1 _.,7----)----:\:'\Ors, 71%.,;:t.x.itatill , '11°'.1.- *_,:19 ' :, 0 '''1-sil. .........0" ---------- \ Fn . . -\\•.A.‘,V tVieeXii, -- "' \ t" 1 "'I A,251, •!‘"'.. -‘.''--„ - \pci, • • ` x`/i • BLACKRIVER r--, CORPORATE PARKNO S L H E H A T 1 L I •a.oi aP 1. U.,�i*v FM . NENTON WASHINGTON '" FIRST CRY EQUITIES IMM=i PHASE IV&V GRADING&UTILITIES PLAN ,,,,, „�,,,,, °a` 2 of 7 i.. tti O. .— 0-.......... ..- . -,..4-- .t. I •Fi -srretrai,,F,,•,,b1"a,o-A .:4l I . . I if7--•+44.41.,,,F....iii6;c*fly ttfitro• 1 . .-.',.. iv- 'lit - ---•00- -' 1-!r O. ‘-----t-oly. AAA (111. A-, ....1 tri ....-...X7.1547....44. iuri ..mr.r, . .' .119 /.....'...,_ I i — oifilli t/r. -S ...... - --.. .. ...,....,....- 140 Ca) lir ON, 6-,4- 694.,...4 A1T-A^. • ' 'it -ilkit_W-1 Ai. IiN. IAS --4 ,--1-- .if7-111'-- - Th1:1 • .. 141$ -.V"' ;',,, i,t;• 6 v lir VI! ,.ii. '13' 111 ':: ill . •' c' 4,,t/ v't', , SZ.-ITLipa lc ot-vs%, _,, II w. -,'. .4: A ti\ 4497,'77;;----•:,,,,,!,_;.to. . .ily iiii,yi:' ---..... , _e2..-. Tm-- '!"72. w.! • , . : - ,'`,-Vai..,-.. ,,,i,-- ;5'.-i'-'-fri't-.D,....:_-..-,-..;.i•iiiii...i,i ii-fi,r o-4+0'0i et--.0.. tto.o..t ets .I":8:.....4.-.f,.0e3n,e ',- v 41 i il,i 7 .., A 0 _A 4., loar• 'trot I 1 •,ira,,.. li 1 . ....'0. 41raP17-..•• l''', ..f ve is,1 \ kiiitir .. •• No ,...w.=0:4:-..,-1-...4. Ilic4,7„.09 iodir, ,,. 2-i.:444,. , .4.1.4•A4 _ ,,4 -).: ILL it 11, dr, te I 1'111 _ 1:0 "ii'ta ".t, . -4i. .40.1'i i f '.,i,.it,,, , ‘, ,. .wo_• • a'*. .f.iiii.:(to # 0.'41kV•._,*1 -11 ''''V\ A '''.......--41A111., it 1 t.'-' 44- .----,--31 1." ..* ..„.1.---11.1 i'" vw- f!! \ .'!.' 74i0t41:, ,,,k ------t.-' ';'':.''' I,r, %4,- -.0 4 _:'--, ! r'-'' ' ;0•4111' ql-' ,.(10,-ie,-4, t-..„..0,1 A. ---z.--, rt.,,,,, 4,-- .. _..,,,..kitt. _„. . 01 • • IP- ----- X, .,,,,,, ,,,„,._..„. \Atli. V N.,•i, e....14. 4.-... •, „ ..-.0. I. 'INT# ‘40..---.4 .- . . -101 - \ 11V0.44 ;t' Ir I. ,NzlicA ,8A, ...0,,,..,..• —.., ....,.% ,, ma Note. ,.. .„„...,____,,...„.7.„--..--4--ri -... .."''- NO DESCRIPTION DATE mri, Kis-------4... --..---- ....-4.ortAA,PiAl.IO•B 8 cl 0 4'41 it- -------- tv 41#11-,:o•---- N:ft. SYMBOLS • !P14'•.' r-___-- P'1'''" 0 rak,--tzr, -17 404-'141-1/1-roft4A-.1.1 J) \ 4.'....r.GCee at,,friOu.W..<40.4W11 A.,,ir4iht..1-Tr%6,...101,.l.9.1-1a, ,Y,..rtE,Ft.oHta rii.C. .41 ,4:4,,A gelie_aliraigil',13-%-,,P.--`71W1-1 GE,GbiZit.K.014-1E,. %...,...A The tc BLACKRIVER r--, Mihell LANDSCAPE PLAN r n.,: AtIP* 1-14-....n,pewtAam i e-,Hir,egam APIRSZAO.1 NelergriP prM"''''''''''' CORPORATE PARK NORTH--1 _____ m4-14....g,kir,.11,-407 pr..10..10,571-1-05itgW 11 Incorporated RENTON EQUITIES WASHINGTON FIRST CITY I 251 50I 1001 ',v..AA 4,V1:47Lt,• PHASE IV&V F7:9 .115..4,- m-,114--1 . CDS... . LANDSCAPE PLAN JOB NOEHASP/ SKIT BO OP CISECR•-6,..C.. IMEN1=11MMEII Y L CO a a) Reflective Glass— —Mechanical Screen —Painted Concrete Panels f Oh- l > I I a �' I 1► .. I0 1 V III IN:. �� in uii T 1 ,� II li > o O� a 0 I I 111 II�I111 1! P niDE � � I TTTTT 1 • 111 1h hi d. 111 1 11 III i1 > >• r . it. W3 Entry Planter — Main Entry • C.) N c 82' • j / / / /112' 112' 134' .... MECO Q C / / .194' I/ / 246' / it W O.CC . WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION • /40,1E,CME.nrcf Pb.vwy —— WOW..RxneM wnnwest r• I O PJn T,.9el Sl»l2 d/•• JDORle WA 9810�(206.).JEk Y, NO DESCRIPTION DATE co,SubMITT L Rr5.0 J I I I 0 , le ■ _Y ill /(... 1.•( ii a T I TTTTT MINIInfTITuuI II T O TTi ITTTIIT _ SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION BLACKRIVER ELEVATIONS I Arcruleclurecr,Flonning CORPORATE PARK BLDGS A&B RENTON FIRST CITY EQUITIES WASHINGTON Pn Norinwe5l,theWfp Her IASR ....WA98ro+.OgJ5egeaw PHASE IV&V —Am ELEVATIONS BLDGS A&B JOB NO,Erlo,(SHEET NO OF DnATwE : s e1 6 of 7 CHECK.Y1.c. h11 I II-LiI 1 1 nii 11 _L_. J 1 I -I_ I t t BLDG.C NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.C EAST ELEVATION L- / 124' / / 332' /— 1.L / 90' / 4, 90' /__ O 1 111 11 N♦ L 1 -H I I 11 11 I i I I 1 —— 77 1 I r a II L BLDG.C WEST ELEVATION / BLDG.C SOUTH ELEVATION 0 am! e Main Entry 8) CD od rn c • c L � — w U C Q 2 • c 'L• mao 178' Main Entry Painted Concrete Panels— — Reflective Glass 90' I A,cnneca,re and PbnnnO - leOsory Pomeroy Nglhwesi Iris Tr - 1 -.-- ___- 1 ■ I Y' -, I 1 n I I I IV 1 ,I I I ni p_9 S9,Al Ab�e 8030 Seams,wo'nteA,'s eaZ NO DESCRIPTION GIN p CUtMIHTAL IopSP/7 BLDG.D NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.D EAST ELEVATION 144' / 90' rt rt rt -I I' N, ill =I I -I--I _L i , Imo- H I_H_ -1 r BLDG.D WEST ELEVATION BLDG.D SOUTH ELEVATION BLACKR I VER ELEVATIONS I ^�^"e'eone CORPORATE PARK BLDGS C&D RENTON WASHINGTON FIRST CITY EQUITIES Lemon Pon,e.W Nodhves.lnc fence eP �9eA IAS Pr WA9n10fr206)%3E030 PHASE IV&V 181 161 321 ELEVATIONS BLDGS C&D JOB NO 87W7/ SHEET NO OF DATE .Ico. 7 of 7 C HECK 0) ------ \\, I-->--- H ,-* .••••••••--A IM= ,\\A .1 \\..1.\\A,1, r''.':."tr 154-5•163513 I :,:t5:-.!,4 W.Arrelt,,,F, ..,.,:. , t.av.la a.-wosturr -, E Ul 1 LITT.EASEN15, 4' TREE LEGEND - - T--- 15555151•PH . ...53,,,,,,....... 1.,--- '''.v". 1 ,, ,,.'775.0.„ AL ALDER 5........r fAs•Sus.1.) ' 4.. ,21'p..*:,...••, ., --..,-- • S I-14'241 W 447.35 /II ----- .A''. Existing Parking Lot , -- -------A\--,...r...-,r-...--“Eitsting Parking LgE ,4\: ,:. ,: 1s.....,::::: ,_. 1,,,„ CW COTTONWOOD S I 14-2S-• 459 00 _._„ DEC DECIDUOUS I ..5-7•8§\ -' ''' *.'.3; • r-11.. §; ----- 7547--.-g:1 21 6'.: -i•a . HAWTHORNE 4-1 A .pi MAP MAPLE 4,----- POP POPLAR , • .1.4 •71. s,... ..2.----7,.T A A,::474:-.:. vk\,\A k 1 " 0. / 44- •-7•544 \ //,„-.--____ i1611(Zi -- i DAG-gait U ' \ ••zsza. x,I• _..-.-----. ,o) 75_ -H.,/ it \ • • --J F7/1/5.UTI L 1 TY EASEMENT ,... ;JAW Ala- .4.ee4-Tea,e..ts .C.0 sv,./. \ )1 ,,..,..__.,...L--• ------ -'.--‘ -Jr '''',-1 ,,• ..,..---Th 1 ' \ I \,,,:‘ •-_-,____...-'--__,4,-----='-"e r. - ----- --4.."). ,,,,, i , 44. . .„ „„ ..__,..„---_-_,_,_,__, fi..,..10 ....t.,.. PHASE IV , ,, ‘_. ..,„...,._ i / .--/-___-___------>-i'----t---,_-__ 0___ st.k Vacant Lot-Futilte Develop,. . %WM ....I'a. •2,25 0.* ........., .,_,...,..,...,...,.___;..„.,, ZA.7:a=--.--.1•1.f,,.------37-ile-- , - ... . v....0 , ----le ...... "' _ ,,,,,,,,. .,,t-,-,--c‘i•‘" ..., ..\. --) -.- ,--„...-ie-'-23-4=---- ,1 p40 ,..t. /-'---- • 00 ....-..11Prak ...-------------:_-------Ifil'00111111"'- . ------- ggi-LP C° 315.‘ I ___.------ ,..2.4 .4„..., --- , _AA_, ........-.. ..---- • *-----:--2--->"))-----.' --------' , , _----- ao., -----'.-- : • i o 73'11'717Tolifo Gok11,7.1720,i123.151 THE 1214141. op 7.04,0(OF 077,Wor.7.11E ANIS.5.72 ARE Faa ' 02 • ,,,,,,,ina• I nil..,.... •... ‘211 .____ 00.01 82 ---- 0E61611 P1201,7•G• 4714LY 00 -. ---- , • z„,_,,._, .....,--- • , ,...... __--,H______-, ,,,,,,, . . ..., ,-- ,--- ,.., --o.>-... ..--------;-'3 -''.....li...""".".."..." .,.... 114."-- .. • ----" ---- '....------ • _-- ,,,,,,e .. ,I.....),„I".;=0 .:•::,:, .. • ___--.-3 N._0P-0‘ • _----- TREE LOCATION COORDINATES ----- .• SOO 1,121.1114 10,11141311 105 DI 1,411.11.11 HALOS 15 11 , ---- 2501 1,121.3112 11,117.5 IP 122 G..,1 S7/51.1112TAL 0.087 250 1752.110 11,M411117 DEL ¢...eo foro.,1 roes,,,,,,,...11,now.,c.w.o.Altr.,-17/o512,1 ---- MI 7131.3171 11,043.1143 6-• 2121 7..2613 11,2171052 10.illl 23.4 1,106.6911 17.3310 3-11.11.0.0111•7•0/771 1,601.1211 11,101.4024 P POI 2521 7240.5023 11,113.3031 115 PA 2343 1,907.127/ 17011.014 24.122 In..inTa1 4 Ao AAA A 2.AA A A p ,/..A/AG ...------- 130. 7630.1111 10,111.11111 IP 11.51......n.TIDO OH /,231.2243 11,231..3 ir ill 2546 704172131 114.3734 725 221111.2 5 Trtn CD tr 501 77020111..26.0411 1111,,112327...3I1P1•2111 11 22155411 10,,,1/0011...16.360 1111,,,001127..11711623 1.1.W9I0 Won ire..Wes VALLEY 40 5 2316 7117031a 11,543.7547 2-21.17.4.1. Pal 710.105 11,440.1431 ir 211 235.5 1,711.6221 17117.14 1.1 T•11.la[12.pr. "Obi " 351 10,032.1236 11,2772631 11 7070623 10,117/114 MI/ 1,504.0.11 11,121.0021 217 D OW 7111.9014 174270115 26•131 HT 1,511.0.69 11,42,71741 ir 1111•41.1151.11111 4,4:rcOL it BUSINESS PARK .4 73 7314.. 11,264.56H 111/ 7691.1519 10,011.3111 2511 1,363.1.1 11,310.26/1 12•112. 2513 7112.1201 11,411.1911 341•D .50 1,121.11. 11,153.9421 5.2/6.7 Mt List .7'4'.'17. ,S 74 1113.4901 11,545.1121 HS 7214.2130 17224.1611 2511 7316.9611 11,..6631 22-D 2536 7202.96N 11,410.1118 315 01 2511 1,3972211 11,110.41141 11.Ell . 73 71294901 17237. 2. 7312.4127 11,513.1.IP Cli 2511 1,2074225 11,404.21 IP MA MO 1,314.3115 11,4277222 1r CY FIRST CITY EQUITIES ' a,,- -`C;,....„...-, 74 1,1315291 11,492.1908 1130 0,117.11157 11,103.3192 2121 1,325.121, 11,471.431,1 2-irla 251. 7.77,7.0 7071.07.71........."..0 2177 11,301.1213 11,444.4476a . 2511 71011131 17417.IP.1.1.5 BUSH,ROED 8 HITCHINGS,INC. n 11,7054171 11,4113.35,1 1111 0.117.11171 aaolva 2522 5,101.100. 11477.1410 1.30.11 3200 1110.1141 11,065.2111 17.1100 NILO 71 77071243 17... 1.1 71.... M'. 2213 1,261.0.21 11,491.110/2-205 2 .0 1,9377132 11,00.115130-21 POI 11,02641611 11,017.1021 176110 26-154/ CIVIL ENGINEERS&LAND SURVEYORS 11.733.1. 14331 1111022 11,2110000 81 1,344.7343 11,431.171 2511 9,441..550 11,111.1321.5 MI 2125 1,401.1371 11,351.14.15 H. 2141 102.451. 112111111M 16 2342 7137. 11,1071624 10•112. 1.1-11E..5.10-4. 311.11. al 0,227.5197 11,411E53 2121 1,380.1114 11,430.5131 15 i311 "" ''''."2' "'"'""'-'"'".""EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PLAN SHEET 3 of 7 . '4'1-•50 VAL 22,1985Ir".MAJ 1.750 63 / _ oweE W--� ,p _g f -_ \\ . /�Fnsc"'cc TJ .________ per ! \ \ — .\\ 4 FI —� LI$uiEirr EnSEr"Evr \, \ m• tr(43. my - ----I——--c..—--- --\'\ f)\\ e'\ tF o �\ I��,__ ICI '\I l , _ Z �` S / I �IIt `rif a y¢ K / ...,....:\‘'.;.1,411/_:"/11:1'-7:1 '' \ I / • Vacant Lot-Future tlevelopement / '�'�l el 1\I O y '� i / \ / ,� I I I 0 W 1� 1 jl I r�r, c-J II ¢i \E. i /' swti Jr.' aec<-ees. /z sp'\ \ J'�• N , i \ - ''': \,I7/ I I ' • j �, ..r I 1\\\r PHASE III /L •/ /./ SEE.TREE LOCATION SURVE`(.... ..,�i•'" \e ^ \I \ e � m v % �� 3 FOR TREES WiTHrN THIS PARCEL. gp Gli /7- jl �o /,[� �Ea. .rm ciE.wirvc uMi swiE o�_ O�P� \\ii\ I .. kuae// 4 / • / \ 1 In mmmme • , ___ ...._. ,• �� ----N , _, /' 0 1 1 r--1 I / 1 1�` •\ \ _J, ,, , /�, / ,1 /E.z,_ !rr i, .,,�.,o saA,,s __. _ .. _5 .,:-,,,-- "'-17,—. a g 1 I I U �I • _...�.�� \ TI,~ P W ° y!w' ; V f � U! , E\, I vn/ � =u;: ` ;:.0: = ofG,• �� ,.._.... ____772#,__________\ % �^_ 1• g 6 � o r i w` , I— e. \ 3 i.yl WW1, EASEMENTS V NU W\ \ ` , 30 `\ v. (oe DIEM n 4.w., ,r:•�,• � — � 1' _ - .., 4. 7 '''s I 1".50. N I-- cr z o 1 • '�,� PHA E IV I $ m t / ` / I oa. i�•y Ik. ' ,, / ::.3 �:° SHEET 4 of 7 1'' 01 ''-' \ I� EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY PLAN -... z.—731.oa 1 'L\�: � MATCH I NE �a FILE TITLE ___._ Ammo, CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Earl Clymer, Mayor Lynn Guttman,Administrator Hearing Examiner' s Office May 10, 1991 __ - ■a MAY e , ECE VE CITY HI 1019 OF ENTO91 HEARING EXAMINER SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park, Phases VII/VIII Final Environmental Impact Statement Dear Recipient/Party of Interest: The Black River Final Environmental Impact Statement included a section on cumulative impacts, reflecting the potential for development of several projects in the vicinity of the Corporate Park. These projects included the projected expansion of the Metro Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for this project was released just prior to the Black River FEIS. The Final EIS included erroneous information which necessitates a revision. This letter documents that revision. Attached, please find an errata sheet for this item. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call 235-2550. S' ely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Principal Planner 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Architecture and Planning Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A„ 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Fes ® February 7, 1991 8 199/ Mr. Donald K. Erickson 0 Chief, Current Planning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Blackriver Office Park Phase IV, Building B NW 89021 #B-1554 Dear Mr. Erickson: Per Randy Martin's January 21, 1991 letter to our office regarding the above referenced project, we are required to post a three-year maintenance bond on the landscaping for this project. It is our understanding that the requirement is city policy versus required by ordinance and may be subject to case-by-case review. Since Blackriver COrporate Park landscaping has been well maintained and replaced as necessary by the owner's property management team, we request that you waive the Landscape Maintenance Bond on behalf of First City Washington, Inc. for this project. We appreciate your attention in this matter. Sincerely, ()di /Paul R. Coppoc' mp cc: Randy Martin Dean Erickson Lis Soldano Royce A. Berg ' .; �;. CITY OF RENTON i.rL HEARING EXAMINER s v Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman • March 23 , 1988 Barbara Moss First City Developments Corp. 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 981047 RE: Black River Corporate Park Phases IV and V File No. SA-090-87 Dear Ms. Moss: The Examiner' s Report regarding the referenced application which was I published February 29, 1988, and; your request for clarification, have not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. 1 Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this' office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, 4-1. -k leal---H FRED J. UFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 F/,,,,,,,, _ - r , .. .4., , . tb, o ;, CITY Y OF RENTON ®® m HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman March 17, 1988 Barbara Moss First City Developments Corp. 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, WA. 98104 Re: SA-090-87 Black River Corporate Park Phases IV and V Dear Ms Moss: I have reviewed your request for both clarification and reconsideration and my response follows. 1. Conclusions which refer to a fountain were misstated and by this letter are corrected to reflect that the feature between Buildings C and D is a plaza which does not contain a fountain. 2. The proposed locations for the required bike racks as demonstrated on the attachment to your letter of March 1-0, 1988. appear to provide a reasonable alternative to that required by the original decision. The decision is hereby modified to reflect the proposed modifications. 3. Conclusion 20 and Condition 4 of the Decision are intended to provide final oversight on safety matters to the Fire Department on issues relating to emergency access. Those statements should not be read as reflecting negatively on the alignments shown in Exhibit 6. The statements and conditions are merely intended to allow the Fire Department to review the plans for conformance with their needs. If this office can be of further assistance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, FRED J. I(A FMAN N HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: All Parties of Record All Parties of Staff 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 4111 4110 Seattle,Washington,U.S.A. 98104 V.* FiRSICify DEVELOPMENTS CORP. ie-e4k4 1PC ' ' March 10 , 1988 � aiN�Q' Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner Ce OP' CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA. 98055 RE: File #SA-090-87 Site Plan Approval Phases IV & V BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Dear Mr. Kaufman: Regarding your February 29 , 1988 decision to approve the site plan for phases IV and V at the Blackriver Corporate Park, I have three points to clarify. 1. Conclusions #13 and 419 refer to a fountain between buildings C & D on the site plan. There must have been a misunderstanding or confusion, as the two buildings are grouped around a plaza, but a fountain was not planned for this site. The circular drive plaza will surround a planting area similar to the plaza created in the existing phase III building layout. 2. Conclusion #19 articulates the suggested locations for bike racks on the property. In reviewing these locations, our design team identified locations for the bike racks in open space areas (to discourage theft) and between the buildings, (openly visible) as suggested. However, these locations are placed without loss of parking stalls. By using your guidelines, we have located the bike racks safely but without impacting necessary parking stalls. Enclosed is a diagram noting bike rack locations. Please advise if these locations are acceptable. 3 . Conclusion #20 and decision #4 clearly indicate that emergency vehicles must have adequate access without eliminating additional landscaping. The site plan shown in exhibit 6 does accomodate emergency vehicles without eliminating parking stalls or more landscaping. r '/> ' 411/ Page 2 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman March 10 , 1988 I am requesting modification of your decision in accordance with the above items. Thank you for your review of these points. Sincerely, FIRST CITY DEVELO MENTS CORP. D Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning cc: Donald K. Erickson Royce Berg Ken Bellamy Mark Miller Charles Blumenfeld N TABULATION SLOGS A 8 B INSAS C d D • PHASE IV PI-MSS V 0 SRI)AMA }403,004 S.F. 1194,477 S.F. Bulidln®Area 1.148,000 S.F. t 50,350 S.F. 70 Bel/dkg Footprint 147.000 SF. S0,350 S.F. _ Site Coverage a11.7% t2$.8% �.i Orono Coverage 230.7% s25.9% r oy� ParkNtp rp ` nx s w ea a ..044,1 �di Standard t4B7 Stalls 2174 Stags 4 I_l] ,J Conyea LISS Slab(xYA) ;et Slab(25 R} sr! n_--, ...cmc Cultrl Han-Bcappad t la Bide :4 Steil pipes : --°r "' /'I.e.'"%d'a' '�� TOTAL 3®72 Siam(1/22o.arm%) ±238 Stalls(1/21 t,Onus) au. II1 ITl �U:rvr..,wv %tAte-ao� r�wv��'fii j'"� " ! D naoorvod �22&BcFa � � .. t"� f.. TOTAL .tBG Bte9a 14/2Y3,Qraaa! CD rl t_L�_ !l a o,',a•ze•\ .rasa Si —-- I I(nI1�� EII0tgq a �.-�.bo i- 'C_.EYntm,g Pltaw 1�a a 1-_�Exlat4vj Phase i--y,a °d Il� • BuildEng ��r^we.c.,:i;x i,.b� ".. �..ts :I _1.°a _., ,_e-^ ,e z V I-i!: ;I 1 I I j . 1�.� t Rc"u3N uuPc t 9' \ �. .' .�"FN ''"i . _' `I I l tj l i__i..l Nt..-' ' ''I111t.U.HI Ll li, �"' '' — q., t .ten e # t I & ii , d_1 J a_ awn ,• - , '_ :.. N c�of 0 y7— D1'- ,per I� 7—ExtstMg Existing Building -.5_ .' $ }, A"\ I I�_-' , s sruRr n a o ,sro r aio .---.1—. girt e : gyp ae nugdalg h I _ i,_,q s igih; 1.- -- xw.r.v. - ,.o.wo Sr. •7.-e.n-� IJ "'.$.>7a S I�) I rj Gs.vs' ri,us rt' _ swim ". �g- _ _ 1` pR at 14 I_I1 _.r c.tx+to ‘of: -- y +a r4,em s>. —r ka- - �jI • _ S f -_ rim-. Cr 111 HI C.1 ram c":w..:.c _ aa' --\�� X1r _ -b r o:a<..�..-a,',- - 6 f ,= a2*tsry= '0{'[I T 1- v L r i` , S 4 u 't�rc- �;�� ZSl t ! = ~4a - u '4 I Cr,Ca _ " I \t!_ .t7r S 4z _ _ .: �'T__-u<n".nu NJ,TJ.^-r) I l .t \ :'ceca.nls. vT� 4 i.� 1 t RK . '� 1 e_ - - - _ r,,�� r e a` III CO l •14.--_MK.•M-. \ ''' ^'•\1 yy��. it"'.✓ - 0. __ n - �r 1 -�G.,.rc''�°c ",r,uK "e•'. i� ,t: 4SI • '/, j a STORY o.. - _ _ _ 9 ' ., l ', L�ca•he¢...- w I I \---\ �1 a„ / f t;TORY OF1- � '� �_ _ L t' i � `sal. ^�.\ .Y -tw-.,.ch.e c r� - x CO �.. �.r,.�.'-_4..,.. - f, F •taA �tL' — ''T - r }1�`i.� - \vim fir w.KV, �s ,ri�r Z• g --u' �3,.t.'r...k t ' - i -�- ALSO' w orsco+.�a .e 4. Alto e.cu-mcac f.,-�c vvlr ' \ cS `yh/f�. �'�.y�,t i 1` iriJ - .'ter` \ ..7v .. 1 1 ,atQtr .F -"s'� �F - _ 4-'-'::::;''''- � \ °'......,..�.-,yam:: �:tn "Sr�.'c:e-r. — M� O TT `�_`o71,,,, G..F�rtti2 M.D. �4ucGo i % — � .' LH-o'ro-v.+.'Y�75 \ T20.1-s.:e.::mHI'T#se:. Jos, r ® ,ar /_ twee.emu... ..09,,,'" a ' r. 1 C W.O.O00.0.'- ,..O,iNo) \:a.sr.co .7 P-1 Charnel - .\ • s x v3 aest.m x�as ao .w v J C .-.,C?„Ir- tM c>.zslc,04 r wcc wv-T ~; BLACK RIVER ` C®FOP®�$d�T E PARKsty€FLANIgprn i ' • • REP)T083 WA$61Ri0TON _ ;• -11 L/U 4 �+ * ,-4. FIRST CITY ECRATTES ,. �`I F d7�Jv1 ! (� • PHASE IV&VI ti7 ` REVISED, FEB.'$8 , . rt, : sHE �. . ,�.� . 1\ E300 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle,Washington.U.S.A. 98104 OftV DEVELOPMENTS CORP. OF {RENTc;:°.g March 10 , 1988 � im Vi It rf-,, Mr. Fred J. Kaufman BAR ' Oi988 Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON /LC:UNG [TET T. 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA. 98055 RE: File #SA-090-87 Site Plan Approval Phases IV & V BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Dear Mr . Kaufman: Regarding your February 29 , 1988 decision to approve the site plan for phases IV and V at the Blackriver Corporate Park, I have three points to clarify. 1. Conclusions #13 and #19 refer to a fountain between buildings C & D on the site plan. There must have been a misunderstanding or confusion, as the two buildings are grouped around a plaza, but a fountain was not planned for this site. The circular drive plaza will surround a planting area similar to the plaza created in the existing phase III building layout. 2 . Conclusion #19 articulates the suggested locations for bike racks on the property. In reviewing these locations , our design team identified locations for the bike racks in open space areas ( to discourage theft) and between the buildings , (openly visible) as suggested. However, these locations are placed without loss of parking stalls . By using your guidelines-, we have located the bike racks safely but without impacting necessary parking stalls. Enclosed is a diagram noting bike rack locations . Please advise if these locations are acceptable. 3 . Conclusion #20 and decision #4 clearly indicate that emergency vehicles must have adequate access without eliminating additional landscaping. The site plan shown in exhibit 6 does accomodate emergency vehicles without eliminating parking stalls or more landscaping. f Page • 2 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman March 10 , 1988 I am requesting modification of your decision in accordance with the above items. Thank you for your review of these points. Sincerely, FIRST CITY DEVELO MENTS CORP. 5-41-111/4-4 Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning cc: Donald K. Erickson Royce Berg Ken Bellamy Mark Miller Charles Blumenfeld _. _ TABULATION 13LDOS A&0 BLOCS C 8 D PHASE IV PHASE v Site Area :403,084 S.F. :101,477 S.F. { i Building Ares ;148,000 S.F. : 50,350 S.F. dp 'll • Build41{7 Footprint : 47,000 SF. 1 50,350 S.F. • Site Cover:rue a11.7`a &!25.9% '_J 11 Groes Coverage 130,7% '25.0% g ill J ...<•..a.,u-.''2,..) 4 at•np.t t I'. Sta4, :174 Stele i eZ Z 11J Ca+n«a e.r6 Stall tSvai :a1 St1M(76 Y) g 1- )Ip.....c.d :10 S1tl. , 4`:1..^• f 5yy R1 l!,-•,,•u' .�. .. TOTAL :erg&•ee(t.'x20.Ores.) :272;t,�11,x 1I,Gro•,)+ �. IT, F ,.::.5""`, �:�''rn'''''-�-........ 1 a'''''f' a 1l+ao...d :r_str6. t '.� \.•• — rt 2, TOTAL eew:aC•li/Y 1a,Or..! ' , C.l — i�„�,_,,',• ..1 ll..._... .---PI RR } ? __---'-__— F_ _a._ .. "�`_ a l __ci1•trq Passel., I -Ea1.1•y Pnu•a -.1 iI, Oull„® ;rIT1tJ, 1if1Ti �� _—,1. • 1 I>> 1 JLr+s, ,_.,_� .1 I. lii `.n. .. . _ --\:,«.iymafl,, �: -�t----'-'-----`---�.--_`.`� �.T ,,....c:7,.. It 'a.�t; I,fZ%u`� 'w <, y _ 1, if 1 T1 r, '_ lirr`Ti lr l , - J4K Q •- 11 1 • ,r14 t,rr( I I•{aa " `i : ' 1 -• ,,�.-;- 'i•-.r.`_`, <-. 1 =., -.1E ,I •s—�1 '-:-,...., -'.,. >/ r {,;%.`=Sr ,.i! :lr !J 4f`�.•_�,-;,l!.��I !�iJj,„.1 i 1 1 r 4 , .---! I'ii _ �`{- J L li tl_�1 ;a�`-"rK-I,::; I.-'' _�� ..C' ,:. - , .`' ,.. °_ .y �.e t �1 S ,- Eal•tL+a eulddhg u.t� e1 y.M..�.,_ I {I I.,y -1 1!t'-'-,�M+ C 'r D( '' .I-_: ,... a �) �'1 v 8 ~Existing Il``t "-.- , "'` =^_'.- :.t''"'"-_.r 11 \. : , rwr!.a +s:a.• :' - , . r_ F !'l sewe,v J • �iI .':. a ,rx "t"'eee 4 :� T I m;w's�. •,a.ae, ! h j - - - !a 61Cm or,az'tiC ` 1:. : a!-;:i.'-' ,,•- �:.. A i�., C n --I J _. _ -Y 4t,,,aTn'+f,•o I' '�_ =1•lwo se. a4.. tI I' 1 I_ 'L.,. _].. —?. i , ,J is _ •',.1•q' ' _ e� _ 'c:c�%=cF�wc 'i f t, r • -.'�' '� _.} 1i •� ___L '.- .�:�m.� - 6 '+ tj� u qr.,..:.-.C+ti E .iw-- i e+.?.. ..�,_r7... ,l t i l t • 1 o g_: _-= -- j C ...VC& ,r� :ram . ,'; " J 'ii'li?f; ;1 I; �4 _ ..r :l�1 s,IC('i7 sly •s '1 _ ri- - \ 2/J I,.i k ..+r Y S 1+1 4. �1 ��1� �, `,----A^µ _ • . ✓ r i�� r-e.1... . CL-) \ ,III 1 1 I I I f !- "...i�- '.1 .74,4 ,r ti -tig i III -` \ ,i?- os '"\\ ,l'. `� - -�' t.1 it �1 � _.r �`.\\t 1, i 1 N.. I I4 Fr -'iA. 3,6.� i,I -a._..,. �, ` / /_ . ---,Up au.,... i. ,� �/ :r.• . tT l 'a �_ .-lam' Y1 , 1, ..- \ �'`it L �) `X ,. Ill ,r.�:.,-.1= `•re- -o-.s '`</i '/ 'V. . /: "-, -: 1_. ..•. om 11 v� 1�1 ,' 1 : "''�` ..�... . __ r,,. * '>f 'X E + »�;\ i,`� !� f�-"" .. y, `<.i\-�- 5-L" .kQ pie A� ��%-". `•• ...,. 4.'s• r, 'Wn '„ w %' to \' r . /<`� - , ' ,tt;. ��;.` \\! ..,fi _ -rda- • : -o.: .n,,.r • \• SSL ?��f 5 Gi "E��^�y ' 1.�.1 ~,� �• tJ -.:wj``°w _ - 'N._.. _ \ \�---- .>.a _1 i •"e+ � -/ ^ \STD \ .fl. • ^ .. r-t"-#-�_�- 1 r ,\ _� a„�� ��l \\ `... rot . v .: Y • \- Y�9�ri'% 1^� `-,--.�� � t.,43'e<o . ,,.,, c..",a.' H �v• -- -------'----4 • S \"'iy�� 4 ,..'.:�._.• .. c _! _",• ,_ �--,:..,max.,: Je.> I -----_.._ P-1 Channel u+rra ,../.;N. . . 4 SCY34B.7.Dt-17••••• © calss^.,0N riOC1..•.._a.r F - t ` r .::' 1 ... - . . SITE PLAN +# 'V CORPORATE PARK 11.0111.1 �l E 0 tit RENTON WAS1t21OTON TI t 3! F . T r'r 5a FIRST CITY EOtfi Tti:9 � , REVISE®, FE' et88 SITE PLAN — —_ �e i AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County, of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: 29th February That on the day of , 1g88 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. T/r' SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this gTiC day of c. s\-- , 1988 -ea - gyp, Notar-Public and for the State of Washington, residing at , therein. Application, Petition, or Case #: First City Equities , SA-090-87 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) tii `': CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 26, 1988 Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning First City Development Corp. 800 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Analytical Technologies Inc. Building Permit Phase III, Blackriver Corporate Park Dear Ms. Moss: Jim Hanson has referred your le';ter of February 18, 1988/ to me for review and comment. Although you are correct in stating that there is nothing in the Environmental Impact Statements which would preclude the proposed use, it should be kept in mind that earlier documents were principally for non-project actions. To quote from the DEIS for the Black River Office Park, (April, 1981) : "No specific site development plans have been prepared; therefore, this EIS will address only the environmental impacts at the general "land use" level. " Since this specific use was not addressed in the previous environmental reviews for this project and since the proposed use could have potentially adverse environmental impacts, an environmental checklist or supplemental environmental information should be provided that addresses the following information: 1. How much hazardous waste will be stored in this facility at one time and where will it be stored on the premises? 2 . What provisions are being taken in the design of the subject use to provide for spill containment in both storage areas and truck loading and unloading areas? 3 . What measures will be taken to segregate common HAV system air within this tenants space from that of other users in the same building? Although special hoods with their own exhaust system will be used in the lab, we are concerned about potential fumes escaping from the storage areas or occurring from a spill outside of the hood areas in the labs. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Barbara Moss . February 26, 1988 page 2 4 . How frequent will chemicals used in processing materials submitted for testing be delivered and will these materials require any special handling? 5. How frequent will the hauling of hazardous waste products occur and has a plan been 'established with hauling routes and hours approved by the City's Fire Prevention Bureau and Public Work's Department? If most of these issues can be shown to have been adequately addressed in existing plans or revised drawings to be submitted and approved, it mayl not be necessary to bring this issue up before the Environmental Review Committee and go through an environmental determination and the subsequent notifications and appeal processes. If you have any questions, please . contact me or Jim Hanson immediately. e ely, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:cs pc: Jim Hanson Jim Gray anlytech LL February 29, 1988 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES File No.: SA-090-87 LOCATION: South of SW 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. SW. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Approl a1 of a site plan to allow construction of two three- tory buildings having 74,000 sq. ft. and two one- story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19,000 sq. ft. A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit has been applied for since a portion of the development is located within 200 feet of the P-1 Channel which is covered by the City's shoreline program. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on February 9, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on February 16, 1988 at 9;00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - (Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Elevations of three-story buildings. Exhibit #5 - elevations of one-story buildings. Exhibit #6 - Modified Site and circulation plan. Exhibit #7 - Racket of correspondence between Mr. Berg and the City and comments from Mr. Berg being presented today. The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff) report by the Zoning Administrator, noting this proposal consists of Phase 4 comprised of two three-story buildings and Phase 5 containing two one-story buildings; the applicant has not submitted a phasing plan as yet; a Shoreline Permit is being applied for and is being processed due to this 13.7 acre site's proximity to the P-1 Channel and wildlife habitats. An EIS was completed for this site in 1981 and included mitigation measures such as retention of as much natural landscaping on the site as possible, noise control and other factors; Oakesdale Avenue provides access to this site. It was noted that circulation on Oakesdale Avenue is somewhat restricted and internal circulation within the site will have to make up for that deficiency. Erickson briefly reviewed certain portions of the Comprehensive Plan applicable to this proposal noting this application is in compliance with it's intent and purposes as well as zoning and open space for this area. A review of the mitigated conditions set out by the ERC was given with reference to preservation of wildlife habitat III r ) • _ / FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-090-87 cc-February 29, 1988 Page 2 provided by major trees; no intrusion in the drip-line area of existing specimen trees by impervious surfaces; on-site recreational amenities,and processing of surface water through oil/water separators. Continuing, the Zoning Administrator revealed thisi development meets the intents and goals of the Comprehensive Plan; a number of the major trees have been retained; driveway widths may vary between 35' to 45' to reduce stacking of vehicles at entrances; portions of the existing landscape are to be preserved to help separate the site and aid in the retention of wildlife habitats; a review of this site by the City landscape architect was made prior to this hearing to clarify to the applicant those trees/landscaping, etc. the City wishes retained/maintained. The proposed buildings are compatible with the neighboring properties; vehicle and pedestrian circulation was reviewed with possible adjustment of aisles which may require setting Building C back 15 - 20 ft.; Buildings A & B in Phase IV are served by a pedestrian walkway system and B & C have pedestrian access also. On-site recreational amenities are few but jogging facilities, horseshoe court, shower facilities, and parking for bicycles are to be provided on the site. Access driveways up to the buildings were suggested to be used for drop-off/pick-up traffic, emergency vehicles, and car-pooling vans; noise abatement efforts would limit the operation on the site from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P. M., Monday through Friday; public services and infrastructure exist to accommodate the proposed uses for the site; and parking requirements were reviewed. Mr. Erickson closed his presentation with a review of the staff recommended conditions, adding 2 final conditions to those shown in the staff report which would provide for shower facilities and provisions for bicycle parking. The Hearing Examiner called for testimony in support of this application from the applicant or their representative. Responding was: Barbara Moss, First City Development Corporation, 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170, Seattle, WA. 98104. Ms. Moss' comments included the fact they have been working closely with staff on this proposal to ensure the saving of as many trees as possible; from a marketing standpoint, it is felt although the applicant wishes to save as many trees as possible they do not wish to create a negative impact on their parking provisions; they are in agreement with staff recommendations stating they will provide parking for bicycles but do not feel staff should indicate where the racks should be placed; shower facilities have always been a part of their plan and they still intend to provide that amenity; and horseshoe courts will be provided. She.stated there is currently a transportation management plan in place for the Black River Corporate Park; vehicle circulation has been improved and pedestrian access has been improved and worked out with staff; jogging trails are being provided now as part of the Oaksdale LID. Testifying in support of this proposal was: Royce Berg LPN Architects 1127 Pine Street, Suite #300 Seattle, WA. 98101 Entering Exhibits 6 and 7, Mr. Berg referred to the modified site and circulation plan showing the preservation of all of the trees on the southeastern corner of the property, with a large contiguous piece of landscaping which the City desired for open space. Berg continued stating the access from Powell through to Oakesdale required by the Fire Department is now provided; 92% of the trees on Phase 4 have been retained with 69% on Phase V; 22 car stalls are in reserve on Phase IV; circulation changes recommended by sItaff have now been made and the applicant was still able to save the trees as needed as well as providing pedestrian ties through the site and between buildings. It was pointed out buildings A and B front to the northwest with buildings C _ and D fronting the courtyard; the 40 ft. curb cuts requested by the City will be provided, aisles will be widened as requested but suggested only 20' to 30' as it takes up much more land and it is felt there is sufficient access width and with plenty of circulation. Recreational amenities ---- include a jogging trail and a master plan is provided for all amenities including benches and tables in the courtyard area; he feels four (4) instead of six (6) bike racks per building is more reasonable; 672 parking stalls have been provided with 22 in reserve; and in closing mention was made of additional recreation in the area provided by Fort Dent Park which is approximately 1- 3/4 miles from the site. Speaking to the anticipated leasing and parking for the proposed buildings was Mark Hemphill. The Andover Company. 8009 South 180th. Suite 103. Kent, WA.. Hemphill stated it is a plus to have a parking ratio of 5/1000 as he has seen buildings with this ratio still have overflow parking onto the street; office space is very expensive and efficiencies must be provided utilizing more persons per square foot inside which will necessitate the highest volume of parking allowable, which in turn is a plus for the lease of a business structure. He feels parking provisions are valuable marketing tools. FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-090-87 February 29, 1988 Page 3 Zoning Administrator Erickson stated Metro is working with the applicant and others in the area for van pools and ride-sharing programs to try and reduce the vehicle trips to-this area noting all efforts to further reduce vehicle trips should be pursued at all times. Royce Berg commented the grading and drainage exhibit in the yellow file dated October 2, 1987 has been modified with a new plan as presented in the package of materials submitted in Exhibit #7, dated November, 1987. Phase IV drainage is now shown draining to the north. Don Erickson again reviewed staff's position as to the reduction of parking stalls. If 100% efficiency is used 989 spaces would be required; 90% efficiency 890 spaces; the applicant is proposing 933 spaces using the 90% efficiency; the City is working with the applicant to use as much of the set aside reserved parking area as we can at this time. He had no further comments. There was no one else in the audience wishing to testify in support of, or in opposition to this proposal. The Examiner closed the hearing at 10:10 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, First City Equities, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan covering approximately 13.7 acres of property. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) ., documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. 6. The applicant proposes constructing four buildings on the subject site. The two northerly buildings, Buildings A and B, will be identical and will each contain approximately 74,000 sq. ft. of floor space. These two buildings will be three stories in height. 7. The southerly buildings, Buildings C and D, will contain approximately 30,750 sq. ft. and 19,600 sq. ft., respectively. These building will each be one story in height. The applicant has proposed phasing the project, or at least identifying phases for the proposal. The two northerly buildings would be Phase 4, while the southerly two buildings would constitute Phase 5. 8. The subject site is zoned O-P (Office Park), a designation it received with reclassification of a number of properties in the valley. 9. The site was annexed into the city with the adoption of Ordinance 1745, enacted by the City Council in April, 1959. That ordinance was twice amended, by Ordinances 1764 and 1928, enacted in May, 1959 and December of 1961, respectively. 10. A Special Permit to allow filling and grading of the subject site and some surrounding property was approved by the City Council Iin September, 1987. 11. The area surrounding the subject site has a variety of uses, as well as undeveloped property. North of the site is vacant land and some office development. East of the subject site are manufacturing and office uses. Longacres Racetrack is located south of the site, south of I-405. West of the site, across the new Oakesdale alignment and the P-1 Channel is the Metro Treatment plant. • 12. Public utilities are available to serve the site, including sewer and water lines. Storm water runoff will be handled by an internal system as well as a series of off-site drainage channels and features. Both the Black River Channel and the P-1 forebay play a role in serving the subject site. 13. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of manufacturing park and office park uses, FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-090-87 February 29, 1988 Page 4 but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 14. The ERC imposed conditions on development of the subject site requiring the preservation of major trees and major stands of trees. The applicant redesigned certain aspects of its parking areas to accommodate these conditions. 15. The applicant modified the parking and aisles, particularly around the southeast corner of proposed Phase 4 where a large stand of trees is located. This stand will be incorporated into a landscape island between parking areas. Nine parking stalls would be located along the west edge of this stand of trees and an aisle would pass to the east of the stand. Similarly, other stands of trees will be incorporated into the landscaped islands at the ends of parking aisles. Some trees will yield to building and parking development. 16. Access to the site will be provided by four;driveways located along Oakesdale Avenue. Turning lanes will permit access across the center islands in Oakesdale at two locations. An additional driveway will provide access to S.W. 7th Street along the north frontage of the subject site. 17. Access through the site to the east will be provided to allow for the circulation of vehicles to and from Oakesdale, and particularly to accommodate emergency vehicles. 18. Buildings A and B are generally shaped like a solid figure eight. Located on both sides of the figure eights' central waist are landscaped entryways. The northwesternmost entry located near the northwest corner of S.W. 7th and Oakesdale is the largest, presenting a focal point for this project at this crucial intersection. 19. Buildings C and D are oriented around a common central plaza which opens toward the west. Again, the plaza is presented to the street. 20. Landscaping along street frontages will be a minimum of 20 feet. A sidewalk will meander through the frontage landscaping. A minimum of ten feet of landscaping will occupy the non-street perimeter of the subj'iect site. 21. Pathways connect the various buildings in Phases 4 and 5 and also provide connections to the developments to the east. Access is also provided to both Oakesdale and 7th on paths that cross parking areas so that pedestrians are not left to rely solely on parking lot driveways and aisleways. 22. The buildings will be finished with a combination of reflective glass and painted concrete panels. The similar exterior treatment will provide a uniform appearance throughout these two phases and tie the buildings, parking areas and landscape treatment together, as in an office park. 23. Staff has recommended that portions of the parking areas be preserved in open space and landscaping pursuant to Section 4-2208(12). That provision makes it the obligation of the applicant to demonstrate why the standards should be relaxed. At the same time the ERC conditioned the DNS upon the applicant making efforts to reduce surface parking to preserve habitat and trees. The site requires 990 parking stalls based upon staff's flexible interpretation of gross square footage, whereas the applicant has provided 933, approximately 18 more than the earlier plans. CONCLUSIONS 1. The criteria for Site Plan review can be broken down into approximately four main subcategories. The first is the overall appropriateness of the proposal in terms of land use, its compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, its affects on the land and surrounding land, and on the City's infrastructure. The second, third and fourth subcategories concentrate on the mitigation of off-site impacts, mitigation of on-site impacts, and on the pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns of the proposal, respectively. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan, provides reasonable circulation for both vehicles and pedestrians, has convenient arterial access, and generally should not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare. The subject proposal also must not adversely affect area-wide property values, must provide adequate air and light, and must not cause neighborhood deterioration or blight. The proposal appears to successfully satisfy these additional criteria. FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-090-87 February 29, 1988 Page 5 3. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for office park uses. The four building layout of one story and three story low rise buildings finished in similar style, with vehicular and pedestrian connections between the units and set off with substantial landscaping, appears to meet the office park designation. 4. The buildings comply with the applicable building and zoning codes. Minimum building setback from the street is 60 feet, and similar setbacks have been maintained between the buildings and interior lot, non-street frontages. 5. The site is well served by both water and sewer facilities. The site will employ oil/water separators where necessary to cleanse storm'water. Storm water will be conveyed to the P- 1 Channel system subject to conditions imposed by the ERC. 6. Development of the site will obviously increase to some extent the congestion in this area and deplete the open space amenities. The development will create an open, spacious, park-like complex of four buildings which are well landscaped, and will continue internally the streetscape created along Oakesdale. The low rise nature of the buildings will not tower over adjoining uses. These buildings also maintain a substantial setback from surrounding streets so that a feeling of openness is maintained for passersby. 7. The development does not appear to have any specific potential to impair the use of surrounding properties or the enjoyment of surrounding uses. The applicant is supplementing the P-1 trail system with a recreational exercise station across from the proposed complex. 8. The size, bulk, height, and intensity of structures is not out of scale with development in the area. The buildings gradually rise in height from the south to the north and will not impair each others views, and will present an attractive aspect from the south. 9. Again, the placement and scale of proposed)structures on this relatively level site avoids over-concentration of structures and provides a faceted backdrop due to the variety of angles in each of the buildings and the offsets provided between the buildings. 10. Pedestrian access to the P-1 trail to be located west of the site is good. Walkways and exercise stations are provided for walkers, joggers and others. Staff has recommended bicycle racks to allow future employees to make full use of the trail system and to accommodate the bicycle commuter. 11. Parking will account for a large amount of the surface area of the site. The applicant will accommodate the staff recommendation by preserving approximately 70 to 90 percent of the major trees located on the site. Some trees will yield to building placement, others to parking requirements. The applicant has reduced from the approximately 990 parking stalls generally required to 933 stalls. This is permitted by code. 12. The parking lot is broken up by substantial amounts of landscaping, both smaller islands at the ends of parking aisle to larger islands with significant tree groupings. The buildings also break up the parking. Even so, the parking standards do militate against creating clearly "campus-like" or "park-like" layouts since parking demands overcome any attempt to create large lawns. 13. The buildings are generally widely spaced on the subject site. As indicated, the buildings maintain a minimum setback from the surrounding streets and surrounding property lines of at least 50 to 60 feet. The two closest buildings, Buildings C and D, are set back from each other approximately 30 feet and this small setback is maintained for only a short portion of their respective facades. These two buildings are grouped around a plaza and ou'ntain t0� 14. The buildings' placement on this approximately 14 acre site avoids any impression of oversized structures or over-concentration. 15. The applicant has balanced reasonably well the preservation of the desirable natural landscape materials through retention of existing vegetation with development permitted under the Zoning Code. Natural landscaping will be supplemented by ornamentals and integrated into the existing Oakesdale streetscape. 16. With the exception of certain driveways which may exceed city standards, the access points appear to provide both adequate and safe access to and from the subject site. FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-090-87 February 29, 1988 Page 6 Driveways along Oakesdale were accommodated in the design of that roadway and will provided controlled left turn channels across the center medians. 17. The aisleways have been designed to accommodate employee access through this site to easterly properties and to allow emergency vehicle passage across the site. The design has allowed for consolidation of access points with adjacent properties and limited the number of separate and conflicting driveways. 18. As modified and presented at the hearing, the applicant has made provision for safe and attractive pedestrian connections between parking areas, buildings, public sidewalks and adjacent properties. Plazas are connected and interconnected by a series of sidewalks. Passage through the parking areas is on delineated walkways which discourages reliance on the aisles, stalls and driveways for pedestrian circulation. 19. With access to what will be a major trail link to the Green River Valley to the south and anticipated extensions to the north toward Sunset Boulevard, bicycles, and the potential for bike commuting, should be accommodated. This can be accomplished by adding racks to accommodate bicycles. These racks should be located (to discourage theft) in an open space between buildings, and openly visible. One of these racks can be accommodated by removing two to four parking spaces immediately south of the southwest leg of Building A and just west of the descriptive language,'12" fir' found on Exhibit 6. Similarly, the elimination of two to four parking stalls located immediately west of the fountain between Buildings C and D would accommodate bike parking for tenants in those buildings. In all, the applicant should accommodate 25 to 30 bicycles in these two areas. 20. The site provides ample locations for passengers to be let out of vehicles, and while this might impede traffic for a brief moment, it is clearly unnecessary within this private parking lot to sacrifice landscaping to add additional aisle width and let-out lanes. Nor should the proposed plazas be reduced to accommodate pull-up lanes for this purpose. If emergency vehicles cannot be accommodated by the current layout, parking stalls shall be eliminated - no additional landscaping shall',be eliminated. 21. In conclusion, the proposed plan to erect four low rise one to three story buildings on this site appears to serve the public use and interest and is approved. DECISION The Site Plan shown in Exhibit 6 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the conditions imposed by the ERC. 2. Driveways be modified to meet the standards of the City. 3. Bike racks for 25 to 30 bicycles shall be provided as required by the above decision. 4. Emergency vehicles, if they cannot be accommodated by the current layout, shall be accommodated by the elimination of parking stalls - no additional landscaping shall be eliminated to accommodate additional turning radii. ORDERED THIS 29th day of February, 1988. V1,4 FRED J. KA MAN HEARING E AMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of February, 1988 to the parties of record: Barbara Moss First City Development Corporation 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, WA. 98104 Royce Berg LPN Architects 1127 Pine Street, #300 Seattle, WA. 98101 j FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-090-87 February 29, 1988 Page 7 Mark Hemphill The Andover Company 8009 South 180th, Suite 103 Kent, WA. TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of February, 1988 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. March 14. 1988. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying ',a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land.use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. 07P ' \\\\e'epf ' • , / 7 , '''f' , A ,./. l' o' •\.if4,6A //i°'fri.4 piofax4r4gli,4,fkui_,:..,. a\ '\ \-, e / iW' 1 ' -„: . O f � 4A � 4, //' '',/f ./ 4 %-1 a� YA 4" .I { ! , t A- _ eii . 1 ?` .}r 1SwAi , t. r r4L J ! , r ---' ''' ply nm1 C +11 • it( I I/ 1 s v., • -- -- ,_ N\ . vy,._- 0,-,1,... „ _.. ,,1 i • __ _ ___ _ , , ,,,,..,..;1 / 1. ____,„ .) ,,,:,7,, ,, , , , ,3f, _l___ 1111"7E1 '' . . \ \I" \ -, I/ , T R k.) \ cf., \\r'4,,, / /id' s1 f j J 1 fit am ] 1 '1- . At ... .; 1 \ a I \------ P 'G1 L� 3 011 sic OSA L \ ,b OB .iiy4 l��mmin I apiT( I t LI, �- ..-- °'°-..: 5 111\ ' ti - ---,,.) atil � 11 On s''' ITID 0-kW 71 / _ le 1f II —, T �rtw _jgy1( moo, - ,# Y r 21� I �� I �i �, r-'�'� i �,I •� ON !ill II 1 -- _ .._. _ 1 !/„..i....r."" .<iiia - _______________---- I, \ 11111 I W i � ��1 �� ,„,, > JL ::----:,. ,,,---, ,,.., BLACKRIVER OFFICE PARK - PHASES IV & V ,. '' SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87 SHORELINE MAGAGEMENT: SM-013-87 * . ...r APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES TOTAL AREA 13.7 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 7th STREET and OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING 0-P (OFFICE PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED (FORMER GOLF COURSE) PROPOSED USE FOUR OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 197750 SQUARE FEET. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION-OFFICE COMMENTS THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. AND SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET. I c� ®. 0 Reflective Glass— -Mechanical Screen Painted Concrete Panels 1 > J I1 I I Q -----] 0 { .`y,1 \ s , I I DI . O r\� -ling 14 1 4 i \ i i.S I ll 11 , 4 0 111 1 iTIT 7 ! i 1 11T 11W.m1 \ I ; T, I Irn1CT 1- . r ,m!IT 1 m TIT I i l '. T� �79.6 Entry Planter — Main Entry 82' 112' 112' 134' V V y f 1 — f / : B 194' 248' it CO a /— / WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION .. Y Y- , .. I js r. ":r ? .w. • NO DESCRIPTION DATE ON SUNAP-DH— o—S e7 i L I I _ I I 0\ I � T' ��� , , �1 I I \i/ 1 1; 1A grrilmi 51.;- Diz1rnTzmz M T T� 1'T - , :I'amTT' SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION _ ._{r . BLACKRWER • °• 3.*�ri,,. ELEVATIONS • gh . CORPORATE PARK BLDGS A&B # ., F ,,,,. RENTON WASHINGTON St,',"; s3' FIRST CITY EQUITIES a f ,teSw.ev...er+c• K Ip'Alh • Er PHASE IV&Vet s`- "' m, - `. ELEVATIONS BLDGS A&B JOB NO ex', SHEET NO CP DATE 0101 DRAWN..P.c 6 of 7 —I= - 1 I I _IBC I I , 1 BLDG.C NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.C EAST ELEVATION t.. ' 124' / / 332' q _ 90 / I 90 / 03) �� � � �r �p 7 — k 1 I { @'ill I 71 I1I fell 1 ilmi =IJ m'I� I I 1 11 1 I f '� I Milf t 11 t ! a L 0 BLDG.C WEST ELEVATION / BLDG.C SOUTH ELEVATION V Main Entry m t✓ 7 ° t Q'L -.m a_c BJ 3 I. � acc , y 179' !, Main Entry Painted Concrete Panels — Reflective Glass p;c 90' Jr n 11 I II f • •alga, I I��� DI Y 1 1 1 I 'i Irn a�3...Y..s .. NO DESCRIPTION DATE . i CU0Mi AL J - 87� BLDG.D NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.D EAST ELEVATION 144' r— gi '1 i 1 _____ 1: 1 L I I I �i I f It Nil t I 1 __I 1 l I 1 h -I 1 1_ M BLDG.D WEST ELEVATION BLDG.D SOUTH ELEVATION i V..,4f 4 p4 a �i ELEVATIONS t �' v�.no �x, CORPORATE 1T E PARK BLDGS C&D r ® ti ,• 1 RENTON WASHINGTON 1 i• FIRST CITY EQUITIES 6e�9�AAG741'4. `� t4w,07 PHASE IV&V I al ie .2I • x..; F=-: gig ''-` ELEVATIONS BLDGS C&D DATE n0 447 7 of T, VICINITY MAP t LEGAL DESCRIPTION TABULATION j�,/ BLDGS A 8 B BLDGS C 8 D . ` 4 r"__ \ "" °`°`° PHASE TV PHASE V 7 Site Area ±403,084 S.F. ±194,477 S.F. 0.. Building Area ±148,000 S.F. _ 50,350 S.F. i a I' .1 m; :, 1 1 •p \� \' I ..,�.. ..., .. r e 1r lao..�.,,.r H..��" ,. Building Footprint ± 47,000 S.F. _ SQ,350 SF. 1 b Site Coverage ±11.7% ±25.9% ,r.r,: I: NacMaAve.S� r J 9 , Gross Coverage ±36.7% ±25.9% i \ PHASE IV 1 l PHASE v 1 b •l,\ •tt «TO.c, '., •••` Parkin ✓W>•- ' '" ra 73 Stang 5 tall/�I ��-. � i,. r s (u�„p•�� Q Stands ±4 ±18 Stalls W,`v° " Compact ±207 Stags (30%) ± 55 Stalls (24%) ` •� 200'TYPICAL �. CO f 1 Handicapped ± 10 Stalls _ 4 Stalls • SHORELINE ,�� -�_=-` -a.u,-c...:;,. al%. a'rarcl,w, id,,a• TOTAL ±690 Stags(7/200 S.F. ±225 Stalls (1/200 S.F. 1 DESIGNATION --'__� ' -ym _ n�r•N'„u- )" sv ? � `'`�D"o`� ; at 93.5%Mooney) at 89.8%EHicency) t /t� •• ��` B': , W 459.00 m W / '� .�•�;®�cr _,� �R�" "�'- 28-F-�-v -- --� n Existing Phase I r-o.l..eor, Existing Phase 0-,/ �}+ " .-•"oD '� Existing .a I - p ��m rL _� t a 01'16' l� / e - .. I II as yw q• • ` K.o. __ Z K «-`` - O W AO 1--._ \ sz 1 # l OO'gv (� Building IS 1°19'28• 425 / �,{ L� IJ,LJ ��'-rw,.v.w IAA Is��e ! �' �o oval µ Lam- '- -- -I le I I I i -wsH--ruL'e rn 1 ' c -7 -_� Ili , , t �4'�TL (�. se u t • } -I s I j } I' / (.-,' ..,I r 12a• _ taa• s..+.. R ¢,c opYE d Existing Building �.7 - t " C ,; 9 C j Existing 1� n S i .2.YP PL,.2r lr Ill p)or � R'�+•'op oeelo.a�.lc m p`Z•O• Q Building "e ■t`a m •��"F 1 •u.'"U-'� I`q`'r it 1 STOAY R 8 D 1 STORY 1�8 D l � i •��-,• I L W i p l.. -`` `9' c mi ±30.750 SF. I.i `±19.000.^.F. 0 . f 67 `��\.• I I N q�„. 1 FF.17.5' . F.F.17.5 p t7 N Z -1 • 13 STORY OFFCE,�T i1 1 -1 (�.�, " W co O O , -r a.Lc>dreo 1 ', '1 371.000 S.F. ss - - I •. 1 I'-' .� o-=x _ �_ ,, CO —�l = 1 T,=_„ F.F.18A' 1 j_ 3 ARE., t" VJ C — (� 1..-u� 4r?.�-P.:U .,ro _ :F.,--,5 Y 1 I _ \1r J a�-eyes�' CO ,{ J ^ ! o � F ( y mV C 7 h- d 4+w MDR 3Ed =Sw 2 l q 4 JL 5a� 90 1aFisu=� c`c-c`-,�..i=-ram is cr�,nc-�'- / i E l I_ �a�.t1 4`yi f o.Z 5 ems:_- fief � :.., 11 •.. a Nn�-v exauc-,.r+ isi r•�:�_ ,lt" �)I I, y t. ;1-`6,' 'C. Y� nu - 1, ` 1 ti _ u. W R' "ls'Tm � - _ ,; I ',,.. r'� .y• a$ 1\11 �' W L.� -'"cFc.5.,ws. 4' /VI Cl, tat t r Q - ; - - 1 J '>rLx T .r. a d. t0 IUFY .TPuc-. E- __\__ -\_ O /% ' v' /e"2 •\ �'a '11 1' � �1� l t` v.,�9 1. -A` Io a �x, 'i f-6��o,.��. e--wee, w. :' ,�.,,,C`e.. T \ �, hY'__,r%- -.�'' s t� � r tt" t -E:,i o . i+�n.er.a%eea- 'f, •L v"I -rr 1i �' .-1 ail t l _ t c.e;<O..�e .'-.1�-'-". Fr - S co,.;2�A�Gr. t` .y ,fir, _ j -3 STORY OFFICE `� ( �-+4� �<q t xF-"t'L m \- // ±F4.009SF. j %�I t1x 1`�',-��E l_ Iti ��.- = ] ^#e e-�cr�w c.eE:r:.�.lrs— „ a •f ao' ��. 1 t 1 gt z,• � „� . �' _ Y� 4��` ✓5/\ �'\ Y O !f cal x r s '/ r=�x _ ° ,lens' �. W W .313'4ODs ,a_'' ./' /� • '+� i _4V;4i..� I 1 �, 0 0- kt. .-• :'..L- i O DESCRIPTION DATE } W �K:.� % .,: q . � N'et. ss. " y 1\1\1 - _• _ -_ Cot512.9 `" i P7 \\ Ire•. , ' /_ <o-e,oW .s'o-slouo f4, �a '- \ 3T o �co_4%ej �-c,\ ^.•t'oc�o�a r ! v Ho of ', d �' q5 `E7 4 oY(1¢.1.i1-4(TYP) _ _- - �74 ..i c.<E _=-I...o.rx.� SYMBOLS' — mac= s P-1 Channel o E..s-•2--4�-0 �e,y i\ Ad7.50 0 O :Is-..;--tip a ¢vL�hrE:- \\ // Q } s�sr v?ef�vci=ur-.na..�: 1 1 • /v\ \ i L 2E.N .e�PilNei eo i. 1(� =iry w•--V..T 1 FIVER ': � I� o L^i ��+C..-cu�....mLT fE f • EARLI;GTG�j 1 1 { uil 1 I ��le3 i`Si I �'z S ;" a••xe4' S� �Iy ®� � J/'�� I '! LL 1 /v`" Eie ° ¢-r BL CKR C7 E1::t / i SITE PLAN �_ al ,,°rl awlmn9a gl ne J - • d/' ppp5..,qq[�//pF4�� ®/q� s!YI o &rJEm9C w [ s � 10OU'47.1..*: ~ # 3 ®��®YEi9�� ■ P9�� NORTHo! e r of �� 1: nI -SO' o` cIoE al `� �F- '\cam ��'PP20JE7r ® a RENTON WASHINGTON10' OI d -- + T'�M .cNr:\Y / Luca IONIv'` FIRST CITY EQUITIESy-10' -- ProFosob Gratlo `OAHK; •�� 1 Y"S*'� �'.i f I _ ' - YP-1 CnarmalExisting Grace +�'` -es- q •• A Ae,q`.'\#",,a'�`•F ( :7\ 111, 50, 1001 1 `` `z Suee4". �" PHASE IV&V t n5a I Ii "-� SITE PLAN . .,.._.- ..�. ,•~_ : ?q o.'oFpJOTEHO e-wz1e1 E5HEET�iWOF y a DRAWN.';_c [ 1 of 7 1 SITE SECTION A 1•-too• VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES , 0 CREC[,YR.. 4 • 7 . .. , . to . ._ . F. 0. _ „ . I I a) , Z t ?�j 1..z:! 5 f�1' � � �:� /,1j��� Y,;,/ Ift1I O ri11 _15-er Q r F vJ �� Cry iot v 1 ;; CD 1-LI _z al L f i l ��jjr5 ra 6 �1 p1 L> Q �' .. • �'. i7 R11 't IDf r�Tv;'�Y,. isww� ,E W 61L W .. J O.. SY� �F1�11 'Li(�.. In •�� 1 p Y-V W`�+ , i� 1 On t 1 I W ¢ �u - o" Ems- c a ..� 4 � 1 V V U� ea w •cc �. t 1 1� : i!; a"` \�J J � ��� 11'd (4F� ri 'y, CO a¢ O \L C .dd .1 { •I J4 ,� ''` 4 #.'.1 `, 1�, Q e 4) ttl 1tt `+�I CC Ll_ l`, r.:H:F-�z�a,. ,4'• r. ?' . r • ;� y •■..- a�.f� i Q) 4 I' v l �'I i - - W \V *A r`..-, .. , P s-� - - r� .+1 �/64 �►✓:*.,to.$ny '�i__, -),I_ •e{7ry r , .pp� - "kr - ---- - - - - - -- -- _ �' \O - r .�" �' L r ,"►�i.E:eKro m s ri:'✓t`�n1 'Pirl" ��j�, �TF�j � yid 7��!- 1 1� � �w#`=*c ix, �'' /:.L:.� �, A t' .1.....t`� .+E�� FINs�Raif '0 — ��I I` 1�1� ' f W m '). � 1ry i I��, M,ck �� f_IVVV�"' i�. _ijj; i • '[�t, S�J> � '• 1.✓ / ���. Ipr W' _ `La:!,I' f �'• i •rjr��'j,1 - L,P ' \_ O f Z, '¢•4hF' W \ _W. ?Alr,.t 4 �; `� .-►, y.� r` plow?I 111 1t �1� 16 a ���tp��O�•p • - ` ;,• W \ � '�w�.. ,�'' tij„i il` ,, :� •I t[""r� l�/�r - �f34 �yk"_ NO DESERET! ATE}, 14i ti.da • V ��� /i 'V. . 0,4, t � ' ?- Chaonel l r�__�SYMBOLS 'Svc._ � ...... fl i c- 7,....l. .t..a�„.y %..wx-v',,,,,m , ,,,,,,,Fw sWa+at" F.c �a ✓%rxTT-^w�; > rN`f�tR6�W3.r3i • • „o/gip Mitchell f',. �.._ LANDSCAPE PLAN hr+w�i Js,r�,az.:ai�.,y j ro.,rE y .,c ,� Nelson -c-�,�i€.s, CORPORATE PARE( NORTH Group s-..p ✓. ✓,.'v,7ou+92,,PGyy✓7 ,e,js�1� Incorporated ® 1; RENTON WASHINGTON pHyIgHF A. ,-.... ? "` FIRST CITY EQUITIES �-''-''�''-�{ 25 SO 1DO ' t_}�,.,z,�1 -14E x PHASE IV&V �� „per_ '''''', ,k, s" -, . � "` ' LANDSCAPE PLAN m. e Hoc•/�TSaajli _NO CS "� CHESS./.4l-- 7 r2\ BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: First City Equities FILE NUMBER: ECF-078-87 SA-090-87 SM-013-87 , LOCATION: ! Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant, First City Equities, seeks approval of a site plan to allow the construction of two three-story buildings each having 74, 000 square feet and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 square feet and 19, 000 square feet. A shoreline substantial development permit has been applied for since a portion of the development is located within 200 feet of the P- 1 Channel which is covered by the City's shoreline program. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: First City Equities 2 . Applicant: First City Equities 3 . Existing Zoning: 0-P, Office Park 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: P-1, public Use; 0-P, Office Park; and M-P, Manufacturing Park. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option-Office. 6. Size of Property: 13.7 Acres 7. Access: Oakesdale Avenue S.W. 8. Land Use: Undeveloped Property 9. Neighborhood Characteistics: North: Undeveloped Property; Office Development. East: Manufacturing • and Office Uses. South: Undeveloped Property, Longacres Racetrack. West: Metro Treatment Plant. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING February 10, 1988 Page 2 C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation N/A 1745 April 14, 1959 o Corrected N/A 1764 May 17, 1959 o Corrected N/A 1928 December 12 1961 Rezone R-400-672337 June 12, 1967 Rezone R-328-793344 August 13, 1979 Preliminary Plat PP-056-80 N/A June 15, 1981 Shoreline SM-90-81 N/A Special Permit SP-1J00-86 September 14, 1987 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A 12-inch water line is located S.W. 7th Street and along Oakesdale Avenue S.W. In addition, a 10-inch water line is located near the northeast correr of the subject property. b. Sewer: An 18-inch sanitary sewer is located near the eastern property line of the subject site. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains into the Black River drainage system. 2 . Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit: The applicant is working with METRO on a program for bus service and other methods to reduce the number of work trips generated by the project. 4. Schools: a. Elementary Schools: N/A b. Middle Schools: N/A c. High Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: There are little or no recreation amenities in the immediate area for the employees of proposed facilities. The applicant will be providing some amenities. Some recreational opportunities will beiprovided with the development of a walking/jogging trail and exercise stations in the vicinity. At a minimum a trail system is to be developed along the P-1 Channel. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-718, Office (0-P) . 2 . Section 4-738, Site Plan Review. 1 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING February 10, 1988 Page 3 F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Open Space, Vegetation, Wildlife Habitat and Surface Drainage Objectives, Environmental Goal, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp.8-9. 2. Urban Design Goal and Objectives, Policies Element, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 11-14. 3 . Commercial Areas and Commercial Structure and Sites Objectives, City of Reenton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 16-17. 4. Green River Policy Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, March 1986, pp. 31- 50. G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, First City Equities, seeks approval of a site plan to allow the construction of two three-story buildings each having 74, 000 square feet and the construction of two one-story buildings having 30,750 square feet and 19, 000 square feet. These buildings will be used for office, research and development space. 2 . The application is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option-Office and the Zoning Map Designation of Office Park. 3 . Pursuant to the City , of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated on December 21, 1987, with the following mitigating measures: a. That efforts be taken to preserve the wildlife habitat provided by major trees on the two site by reducing the amount of surface parking provided (up to 25% of required parking can be set aside in landscaped reserve areas) and rearranging vehicular circulation patterns if necessary. Note to applicant: When the applicant can show the City'.s landscape planner that new tree plantings have matured to a point where they provide an equivalent or better wildlife habitat, some of these exis ing trees, only then, may be removed. b. That impervious surfaces not be allowed to intrude within the drip line area of existing specimen trees, being retained on these two sites. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING E INER PUBLIC HEARING February 10, 1988 Page 4 c. That additional on-site recreational amenities (indoor and outdoor) be provided to the satisfaction of the City's landscape planner in both phases of development for the use of the project's . estimated 620 . plus employees. d. That all surface water drainage untreated by grass-lined swales be processed through oil/water separators approved by the Public Works Department. e. A fifth condition, having to do with the treatment of 41rface water runoff in a grass- lined biofiltering swale along Oakesdale, was deleted after recommendations requested by the applicant. 4. Section 4-738 (D, 1). lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a site plan review application. These criteria are discussed below in light of the subject application: 1. General Criteria: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The Comprehensive plan Map designates the site as Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option-Office. This designation allows areas suitable for a mixture of service, commercial, industrial and office uses. The major emphasis in this area is to allow offices. The subject proposal complies with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan with respect to uses. The MP/Multiple Option-Office designation criteria states that development in these areas should be characterized by adequate setbacks, landscaping, design standards, wildlife habitat and open space, and minimum impacts from noise, glare, traffic, air and water pollution, and safety hazards. The applicant's site plan shows vegetated areas around the buildings and the perimeter of the site which somewhat soften the visual impact of the buildings and the parking areas. Major trees have been incorporated into the site plan and in some instances building footprints and parking layouts have been modified to comply with policies on landscaping. As currently proposed, a number of larger specimen cottonwoods would be removed to make way for parking aisles. Staff are recommending that many of these trees be saved by renting the aisles or eliminating parking spaces that are necessitating the tree removal. The applicant's proposal generally complies with the landscape policies which talk about providing landscaping that enhances the primary design through the placement "around all structures in the interior of parking lots, and along the periphery of the site. " Fr '4.\ , • / BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EINER PUBLIC HEARING February 10, 1988 Page 5 An area where improvement is being sought relates to Policy 1-C that Istates that "desirable natural vegetation should be incorporated into the design where appropriate. " Staff are recommending that an area east of Building B, that currently has a couple of clusters of cottonwoods that would otherwise be removed, be set aside as a natural landscape/parking reserve area. On site recreational areas; such as a horseshoe court, might be incorporated into the design of this element. The applicant's pr posal also complies with the various Comprehensive Plan policies in the Green River Policy Plan specifically with respect to land development, urban design,and recreation. These generally encourage "low use building structures" with "small to medium scale office and business park uses1! being "harmonious with their setting. " b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject site i.$ designated as Office Park on the Zoning Map. The project, as modified, generally complies with the requirements of the zoning code section with the exception of the driveway widths. The site plans appear to show driveways with widths varying between 35 to 45 feet. The applicant will need to modify these with to 30 feet to comply with the zoning code. co Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The proposed new office building will be setback a minimum of 79 fee each from the east property line for Buildings C and D and over 120 feet for Building B. Parking with landscaped buffers will predominate on 'Roth sides of the common property line to the east. The subject site is bordered on the west and north by city streets and the parcel to the south is vacant. No adverse impacts to surrounding properties are anticipated that have not already been addressed by the conditions imposed by the ERC. R d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; As currently proposed, vehicular and pedestrian circulation between Phase IV and V should be improved. ERC recommended that the first aisle of parking parallelinglOakesdale Avenue S.W. in Phase IV be extended tolthe south across Phase V to improve vehicular circulation between phases and to facilitate ingress and egress off of Oakesdale. The recommendation to retain and save most of the larger specimen trees on the site by placing up to 25% of the parking into landscaped parking reserve would allow the creation of some larger common landscaped areas in the site as well, which should help to visually soften it during the initial years when the new landscaping is still trying to mature. These changes are some minor adjustments in the proposed location I of pedestrian walkways and /1! �// BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT / PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER / PUBLIC HEARING February 10, 1988 Page 6 should mitigate most of the impacts of the proposed site plan. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The subject proposal is not anticipated to adversely impact surrounding property values and, in fact, should enhance them. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; As noted above, both staff and the ERC have sought improvements in tis area. The previously noted extensions of the parking/circulation aisle in Phase IV south to Phase V will enhance vehicular circulation between both phases. Although Fire Prevention has not called for it, staff does believe unobstructO emergency/convenience access drives to the main entrances of each building would facilitate such things as "kiss and ride", a vanpool, and passenger drop-off/pick-up activities. Whereas Buildings A, C and D have relatively direct and delineated pedestrian access routes to Oakesdale Avenue S.W. , Building B lacks such access. Staff are recommending that Building B be provided with similar access. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed site plan shows sufficient setbacks between the buildings in order to provide adequate light and air for the complex. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The project should have minimal impacts with respect to generating noise and odors or other harmful impacts. During construction activity there will be noise generated on the site. This can be minimized by following the mitigation measures for noise listed on page 73 of the FEIS for Earlington Park. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Development of the proposed project will not create a burden on public services and facilities. The site is adequately served by water and sewer and the applicant as part of the development will be required by City code to install fire hydrants near the buildings. In addition, Oakesdale Avenue, adjacent to the western property line, has recently been constructed. This roadway together with the connecting network of roads will sufficiently meet the traffic needs generated by the project. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The subject proposal, due to the layout of the site, the landscaped areas and the building design, should enhance surrounding property values and continue the trend toward developing the vacant property in the area. C-0233 post l PVs ©� Notes . Notes oto C-4233 H es V Notes j , q 1 7 C-4235 p t _. 1 C•4233 pp C3 Notes Notes �o C�233 _- _- i Est ® E�'iess2 ' Y4 I Notes Motes r, , 1 ir i , BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING February 10, 1988 Page 7 5. Various City departments have reviewed and commented on the application. These comments are attached. Please note that the Traffic Engineering comments have been modified and the first condition of the division's comments with respect to Latecomer's fees for the traffic signal has been deleted (See memo from Gary Norris dated December 18, 1987) . H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDAT ON: 1 Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site plan review application for First City Equities file SA-090-87 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with the mitigating measures of the Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated issued for the project. 2. That the applicant modify the existing site plan to create large, naturally landscaped open spaces that save clusters of existing cottonwoods currently proposed to be removed and provide wildlife habitation as recommended in the FEIS by setting aside some of the required parking access into landscaped parking reserves; Note to Applicant: Since Section 4 allows up to 50% of one's required parking to be delayed or reserved, staff are recommending that those additional landscaaped areas be created by this method as required; 3 . That the applicant modify the existing site plan to show 30 foot wide driveways; 4. That the applicant revise the existing site plan to show improved vehicular access between Phases IV and V by extending the existing parking/circulation aisle parallel to Oakesdale Ave. S.W. in Phase IV south across the front of Phase V. 5. That the applicant modify the existing site plan to improve vehicular access (both emergency, service, and convenience) between the entrances of the larger buildings and the abutting streets by either wider aisles (less prone to blockage by cars entering or leaving stalls) or by means of unobstructed access drives; and Note to Applicant: Such access drives would facilitate ride sharing, van pooling, deliveries, and emergency vehicle access. 6. That the applicant modify the existing site plan to show improved pedestrian access between Buildings C and D and between Building B ad the sidewalk along Oakesdale Avenue S.W. r/,, - . / . -, 10 ' we", eeip.77, /...,(--.\,140, ',,-T7- 5.; ,;,,,,,----, --,,,, • 7 -' — — X, ,, . ‘ .) ,,,,,. , , , eh. , , ei ,,,,,e,, fr,,,,,:iirr,3 - \ ' - ;:..7.;. .......43,„ , , /,,,-,,,,,z,,4,,,„ , (,,,,,, ,,, \ ,4h, __ \ ._' Sao.- I' '... e 1 C _ ' _ ?fMee �r4`,� r' 'i' _ T I F 1 /1/I ` , . I, ,. Sw • -_ - __ �. .�t,. kit' j t�i w- if. �Y `'_ ----I- Z\ 4 ~'' t i ice` 1 W� .,. 100 ck T R ,` , \\. �:. 1} , ,A, ,/ f' �►le '' - - '1 icLi 1 I _ a -L- -- - -V �- ,a - __! LAN - - - T ��� 20 1-• FA' 5\G _ p \ a ` p �' 1 I q V__--- ��.` ` - —by „)‹s 1 I II, �J j� i �-- j �1II��l ri �!�I 011 , ,crT r� 0 1 f 11_ - h___ ____ ."'->).- 51111 111� I i _I t / - / �! .C IIITi°LAM _� k F , , ,,„„,,,,,,,Li„idid Y-�"'{W� ,..1 , --------- „lilt BLACKRIVER OFFICE PARK - PHASES IV & V it SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87 SHORELINE MAGAGEMENT: SM-013-87 - if APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES TOTAL AREA 13.7 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 7th STREET and OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING 0-P (OFFICE PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED (FORMER GOLF COURSE) PROPOSED USE FOUR OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 197750 SQUARE FEET. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION-OFFICE COMMENTS THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF OAKESDALLE, AVENUE S.W. AND SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET. VICINITY MAP ltl ) I LEGAL DESCRIPTION TABULATION BLDGS A&B BLDGS C&D \1•,\:'1 Ltal.EX1001,110. PHASE IV PHASE V �� �` •a' f b I j 111 Site Area ±403,084 S.F. ±194,477 S.F. O .�( Ida.- I I �" �'° Building Area ±148,000 S.F. _ 50,350 S.F. 1 �_ _ 3 �� I �'D aro< Lca vL 0 511 Lm v9 0 6ao`Wm al Building Footprint ± 47,000 S.F. - 50,350 S.F. �'1•. Site Coverage ±11.7% ±25.9% Nachos Are.S. ' /,Ir r I C ••I.- p I Gross Coverage ±36.7% ±25.9% i'Jy/,' ` PHASE rv� PHASE v ' �4;1. no,cm H. Parking s, •- -I -n r- n •6U 1 Q Standard ±473 Stalls ±18a Stalls =�;'",y{ -O,WU'�' •�•- _ 1` ®19e Compact ±207 Stalls (30%) ± 55 Stalls (24%) ' \5,� � -•. ' Handicapped ± 10 Stalls ± 4 Stags CO 200'TYPICAL .., SHORELINE ...w,j .2,,jr-,�..w.- 2..IT,re/ n'corrww;�,,, lo,�,z• TOTAL ±890 Stalls(1/200 S.F. ±225 Stalls (1/200 S.F. a ',�'{ DESIGNATION !74 ,AIA..,S" ".»» m-`C' tu,. -v�)..' sw: )� t` O1G1. 3 at 93.5%Etticency) at 89.8%Elilcaney) ." � ~� "� � 1-. knaor14'28'W 459.00` "- "�Ici. i 11 _II--"— —!',�_ ** . \Existing Phase I O Ind Existing Phase a .O Ling -,.~r Building �(~ �•�, Z IS 01`14'28•W 425D0' I '',y� Q QS L� �' 11, l2 4Jur- -"T _1 «-: _I 1 1 III I-- ----� - 1 F!u:s,r!u a fi "Z .»� I ' S. t.___ 4.___ 5___ /-I1L�W z4•w-,o.l+xrn -Z �; vns..E,cJ�c,,.E I ,e F,a— -e•Ee ryr o-nr<..:r<r(14fCll e T 1 ,I ,4 , ,o;�rir,:.a -9-"10 " - _ _ -_ ❑_ _____,„,.._..- N�_ II(—Prima u.r. Existing Building o�'f • - ( eff rv.'�.:„•.[ ^ -r--' - //1 -I'I•4,11_ >r EXISHOg i _ i 12 kv vl uav µ, C ® 1 --� .. OF oEcloualc .Oq, CD Oif �T 1 STORY R SD ` Building <I ,,e w `p .1�w+... c\,Q ±30,T50 SF. _ 119BOO SF.� lia ® L 1 FB ' N 2 FF.17.5' 9':��FF.1T.5' Im cr•b N •' 0 STORY OFFICE _ j ;=—N Lcv. c+:Gc o j ,_ r4.0o0 SF. 50 - J ` I ;3 F- T W Qtrrrc,�C TT.+�Gv� �A:� TE� a--M1, r 1 t ��i± % ,�5a '- IA r �I H. �--GO• ' I je0i �'Iv�-.G..r'�OJ of ..\/ ry C GrI GP..,..0,¢rJ.,.c.. .7S.E-h� '- ' 481.99 �__ �1 a \�\1 lffl _ Di �"^ Iy�� N py� C To es>ncr-eo .' ' E _ l - - f. W CIA C2 erik { ly 'i 1 1'1 t\V - - J 7 11u a2 ;••'t„/ �• 1 II 1 I -�,.,.,r.G�+.2A C-vr) -.z'Crx.O<aJS '\_ I 1 U1 i,. F r I ./ • IUF..ac.-c�c-yam` __\.� e__ �/ 0� ..y. �11�'�- v -- - 1 u.lE:->; I� - _.��creouu.x, �'q� �Fyo+rt-o-.�w..wcc-,� A.. o - ir; ,i= � � �nn.G !'Ei L„irITS , 5 �� _.� .0�,u.E 1"•,x,m_Tv > M ei�\y's��� , li w I �� Y...-. ���.i� "ry��_ ac.s,as GAWDZ/rn�I '(A.,j u w `' ` a v �r b Avenue S s , \ 'm r I' - e,; -. dale- \ i 2e•oa cc—U..ww ^'. �` - :>' ;" .„.�"' e%/ . -w ww-t`; �_ _______,Dawes, �L3.D1 -✓j aLs<RIH,7- E a., ',. '�_ o� -c - \I� _� + Icm.S;Jrvr i-...L �wT.97 ;s P•o_''" ECG v/•.1-- \ S� �.1,y` �i •y .�: I ,,i 1 \1'i- �� - - • \\ ''''),A ' \' 7 -_c=¢.ow .2•0..GDJpLL r ,0' I' •37 \ - �ce-<�%,>,`--E.. xc\ _ _ ^,,'Csoouas \�.�f� •\\ 1#'�.t / -. a cG—r-.we.:.:5 -2 CL is-6<.;:.-_ro:'-K�s) e �d EY5T.ki FItaE rIYDolIJT(�P) _ . \ �\ `v \ L ,a •` SYMBOLS \ R aT so k P-1 Channel .G,wV--,,,,;:. O sT,w-.6=-e-s a Gs,e«c rrEc ' \ //0 " � I. { s.sT Al."W macs�•nrN�.. ' / /8(_Z-ci,c,„ ...Ou9-cIH8,o;, .:,•9f o "\ p �,K�..vi.w..; RIVER ,?Y,aa . �( �T�v,..,-.E� is EARL GTCILY �� y I I dci-Y lu i?—ram ] t ((/y. �1r�[p�N��yy tn(a���f�p�'(py 3 0' 1 1 In Psi i `sr 0--. .#. �'•:.i ,--v,, '-'LO�CY.IY Y��Li.a'■ Y Bullets.;a al�I g g s, r �� 1 *1 , FTra SITE PLAN .•z o �aWUgG I �:...\:....t...,r'.� 1 1 �� y 1 . N ROro^9k,' CORPORATE PARK NORTH`Ia ,,,,,,,,4. gi I '1 �••� 1 ll # ® f' T L- RENTON WASHINGTONO OI a C `. rg ' Al, PROJECT w = F +/..f:,o' ----- - -- t 4 / LOG4TION ' ..• ,• FIRST CITY EQUITIES lo' P.oposed Grad. l' f; .., e.�.cc I'pu,-8 .!' geh,('ma'br.-4,..t.�„r P-1 Cn 101Existing Good. �P"•' \v..wrN �a .1 T 1.IIa,O.v 2 I 25 so tool `" txf` r 1-L A.W*t81122005 PHASE IV&V • ���cy- �TT-•cc`- c'•,ra.,l �FY SITE PLAN JOB Nozw ",_ a..d. `- lsyi�y 3. ' o ,;. SHEET No a y__ SITE SECTION A ,--,00'^ _ VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES' _ .� Y cNLCN,y`.`.. I of 7 • , a 1 1 . i 10 EIMAIII e. • 1 II, sli_51.• .!IL. •••07,1 ' G...I.: 1 y (`(3�j A I r g to e W is a ; D 1:.13 \I\L-------B :::::%74:-- ..Eit '';'-':11 _T�} --�--� -1 -\si ire\ ,.\3IHI "11 y��i`/� CO , . t ...vitt., ,,, la-111„!;.swakm, „...-...ik,v \ 4.,..__oi, rt 4,116, , U,Lairtzkvaal ,.:,•,-., --.. 4-,:%.' ,-.,:.: . • ` /ice A St*a t _.• .7 _ a }M- . \\_______:,%\iN-4* 4.• . _____,....,,,,„,,.,., V. .,...* --41-00.,,it ,; c„ 1 '* ,',...... ---- 1","" \f'.\\ ♦i�� 0 \ I ' %,:tall' _ —- Ira xw■vrw gu , t:• •\\♦ s 1 __ter%.. ...._� jic\:\•Zy..7,,..:7/7:-.47:**;<,..-° \. 4 IáT �:t RENTON WASFC.YOYON • oe a A.NI ` "`t. FIRST CRY MUMS !' ' PHASE PiA'V °f*: {, xy GRADING&UTILITIES PLAN :sgar' ' EMIT 0d - -01ait.00 xr.a.we�- -• 2 04 7 ` ..:0 .be Ca ®. C . _ a) �, .� .� �r rIa��.... 1 0 �i 4 I II';I: tiIIII I�FSi1 1 _t ,. 71� 1 1 c �!*I ifel ' fir-,°//. ' ���'I , r ll 'Alf i I I I i I I j ,j 17-..I ,-e.� a so,,,-, 1s ' I I,111m' I ' t �,+11 - �7,, W....,ear o 7 ,..7 lir!!IC,,,x,44. „,„"1.,...,4;.6.1...,?: csoser-.... ,4,...„ -IK, 44t2,:e:mwt-it--.-.11 1 ,L.---:46-14i---:fti:!.-',411--IP r. $31 _1 . _ t + 1 a . 1 cI t' ��'•• �41. s,�_ ��oti4 I; W C — o ! o. w.z CO • ir \ �, -„,,k--„i 1. 1,, vir�r%� ° ! ` �' -=tit 4 • I ,I. r av ;* \ • ...lc/ CIt ' lift ` \;; l'7‘c'-':,.,;(41;'4;".' -v-" •• Vt. 4f1Y. \ ' '„1'2 ftrof 11-# ' '----rr 24''' .,4,-, , ;kw A „ z/T.c4".; A ;-..::::----s—_-?:or.,,-- "..-,„ si if,40.1404 --1' 4), 40-*-1, - ' .\----,. * ...,- '...Amt.'1,., \ .111.\. .4.' :AI 'qk -------- 4..' . ... ---'--- si'`'fr-O.A.... ‘\ _A-4: Orel' .alli""• '-• ' 4'rs,%.•'.....*5.'1-;...-M \ YAdake- K ";N�"•!,VC�'�7,\- , , �/ryM/� fk �`01:----• I �a1C o` ocuxIvrwx CATS SYMBOLS e �.. �. //' r�_� P-1CharAel ---J �tia-wy;� 2o-6.-i,:off,;oar,i �•\'k.._ .r4 :. d—-ep-,.'ter',cFL-i-,-eY-1,,,y( �X\ 1 pp9 .. @• .)-IMF ,, PSIiry 7-v..✓ `(a "�3a..P�•n� rMrtg.,A.0..sgw,�(^_' �-.M1N G.a..G^%'�a ���ii-�-..:v>q C (�wn'6 �,r, [p�q IyI �/�y Iq1_{��p I{}�{ yp}���g}q( a 1 �r n. '> a_5,, �J, +r+yt>0.-Ieoc�is+.< '�1L' „ ..r,-y� k.^�, i�l�i"°i Q:JC®Y ■1�C�Y ■ Grx` 7��i o Mitchell -->„',' �. LANDSCAPE PLAN cfn h�wg rso,4L>..za.,, ra,,:: ,,,i ��r� Nelson e` - wgx-x "_. NOHrH Group I N. , C®RP®RATS PARK t II .4sa,-p w.rat,IX�„—,p.,.^'ih'^'�7 µ�y,,,.q 11 Incorporated y ® RENTON WASHINGTON \ t� .�� r5�-11 net '` ! ;',Y" r,*E ti-. a �� F �.� FIRST CITY EQUITIES , t ..-, .,a.na, ,� .. ,,!'{ `'r 's��t< " I 251 sa rooj • z° v ' Y.:+ir F: , > PHASE IV&V 1 - ,. ,z,1,..n kv"' ,_ .-'.'.- '. ' LANDSCAPE PLAN JO B NO.-7ca V SHEET NO a ogre oH..N: '4 5 of 7 i r------ , t '''''''' '''''' ''''''l ; a. ! i I. • V CO • 0 f Reflective Glass— Mechanical Screen —Painted Concrete Panels al I I - I - 1 0 I I I I.>, I 1 �— I N. I r,-=rw---'4 L � i N W b TIT T ' M. 'T T IC,T IT T AiT �L1 DTI I� IIT,T ITT. 1 III T' L <�r_ ` M > > ° Entry Planter I L Main Entry Y. Li'3 R 62' 112' i 112' 134' m CO CO a c t iL WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION na I e,s« s r x bJ µ�' ^- y et�.,...t, q, t oEUKwnON DATE E ' G.,"Sup.EK-TA as e f 1 I 1 1 TAT — TTTTIT 1 TITnnTTTmJTmT TITTITITI �, TT 1 'T!Ti La SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ' `'� BLACK ER ELEVATIONS # a 14 z' • CORPORATE PARK BLDGS A&B �, ` c RENTON WASHINGTON "`,` FIRST CITY EQUITIES i ¢3 K. bh6'h K 3xcc� lir cz� PHASE IV&V I�—e�tl gi",m K r"3 w-, ELEVATIONS BLDGS A&B - JOS NO EI0=.1.SKEET NO OF . i 1 DATE o-2 e'!, Yac 1 ,_,__ __ , 1 F I h_Ld 1 i I ---��1 i��,---L-� ---L- �I 1 .= I ' 1 ' I, i� t MIBLDG.C NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.C EAST ELEVATION i CO 124' / / 332' /— a. 1 7.7 i�l 1�; { I 1i III '44, �111 I I m. 1 f 1 i i 711: I li co BLDG.C WEST ELEVATION BLDG.0 SOUTH ELEVATION V Main Entry N L > o e �°grn � c 7 3 U _MI a 2 iz CO o-lr y na' Main Entry Painted Concrete Panels p Reflective Glass '." - + I I I I� 77.- 1 I� FITI 1 iv r ; �1 t. �=s a w } NO DESCRIPTION aTE , C T CO6NrTr*L.ie.,E) BLDG.D NORTH ELEVATION BLDG.D EAST ELEVATION 144' y i • 90' i • BLDG.D WEST ELEVATION BLDG.D SOUTH ELEVATION . ..... .......... .......] ?� . -, BLACKRIVER"+ x r . ELEVATIONS i I� ' :u CORPORATE PARK ; BLDGS C&D I. FIRST N WASHINGTON ' � �;� �� FIRST CITY EOl11TIES y.E, PHASE IV&V I re +Ei 321 _- E' `v'".. ELEVATIONS BLDGS C&D JOB NO a c1;/ SHEET NO Of DATE .IC-R-61 ' � y I Tho ,I � o 1- i- h 1—� 0 L<: O d O O , \ i' • • ..`\`�' I . Y rP:»" ,�,8 $ �..,.,..'(/�- °'..�d —- - _ ��S �.�..d..� >•uc LEGEND AL ALDER ` I I 1 —__ry_ 1 ' �111 rw �o D DGD 'I •88` 1----,-•+.„w .�g .I_ .1e ExisUrtg Parking Lot _ - /�W„-.�,,,• „,.,,,".Existing Parking Let ?t 1 DEC DECIDUOUS HA 11.02110RDE e°=., �,.. - �_'•`:'-- _ ---r ,.tt.z,E .IEOG •' � a r .,.a, �. -.�) i�•,b�w•,,.,..,.o,. NAP MAPLE w b.,y ,," . pop POPLAR I D\\e �, �o�J „° ;',,,5.` .,,.„•E D. GP SPRUCE WIL WILLOW ' (21 ' \II)---A.A.'°,-. .1./,,.:-.L.."''_-!. ,•\° 1..\ V_ ,,,` c...a ow oat,P.5L5 g ::..7.:::Th,J,,i' '''1( J j 1—Rs I a. II / 1 ] crBft -lel .s Js0✓.•GG FEEr/Pe"a A,cJ xceuD,.>}•, - =- / adcvP JI i3 c . -r��, a �. -,' 4 .: .P PHASE IV .o >t-"----_.,a= P��.��I 1 ��" =„,+ Vacant Lot-Fuiltre DevebP•x �_:� '�L� / • PHASE :eo . fir% j _,,, —mac-`' • Pw.•weo .rcouzz.Ar•+.N ntE e s"t /f• a WAT OF OAv.....EAVE 5'5 Ac5 ROD - //• /No�� ,,„'' / /Via,•,Pi •/ ^0 an...�o sN' , /-�/m� / // \ F�isJ P¢OPOSEs OILY • • • may /(, //• V -•r _ /�v �-5 ye ' ,,. lam: .o UN —o l £ pro e naY 1-f TREE LOCATION COORDINATES 1 m tw.en v C CC'?St 9N,,AL n.4-9") • �- �r mI 1,9.9/1 yoe•n , / 1 UJ V V� M� _r�a*rnee sr,,,'," n..i auuu' w.a.e.-.M•n n•1 �nn lts f . .00cn a.zaza ..r .V f/e,t i / PROPERTY CORNER COORDINATES\tilE n•nli oi•11• i �DV VALLEY 405� p Ni ""' n1 °°""r� BUSINESS PARK n•• n. �1; 1•n 1.15.0w ic,u.D11 4 l FIRST CITY EQUITIES BUSKHR H BUS ROW& C INGS INC. ia• •,i,,,, Danroz101 CIVIL ENGINEERS 8 LAND SURVEYORS 06 u •,m.,ti n, n• 1•�.,• ,.A P 11. n1,1. ••v v DD =•KnE°°EXISTING°TOPOGRAPHY PLAN SHEET of MACRE j,� I"' I an 1-.5o' t22,1555 MAJ 85053 �� I <moo _ /.«,.,�:: : , , \ .. 'N-..\---____,.ry • ... te..r :I, 42. U o, / . Q V o /--- . ./• Vacant Lot-Future QevcIopement ,!try'�'��II. g '' - -if R A c:T,..r3 -i/ I I , i 0 z \-...)'' /. '' ( ✓<-.ec aee-+ ees, iz ea..•«s +-<,�<cae,.r I - I;,,''� ,- PHASE TEE co i . , ° �, / / SEE�TREE LOCaTiON S.]RV C`i + � I I I\\\\�y �~' m • / / ` _ FOR TREES ViT4O4 THIS PPRGEL.. ��a� �pga n / / .1. /•: \\ /i /,__, / 7 A I --,-- .... ." A.T.,, I \- . • /,'-,-,*-----------c"'Z'T A 7 / ' ' ' - ' - '"' ----'7;'---7-70.-------'-'-.7: 1 I :_,,z:.:7__:;_4H. o‘.., Vt.\.- a k p......,....„......,..._... —_ ' c (ii:.,,,, /-'' l� v Jl �' - /' .1� ,� .i tl \\� I r ��� o� '" /�/�'I ( -_n sn:�,s,.. rr�a r F C r _ ---� °'_ = 1 j % C .. = .� _` _lam_�' 1 i ; ,o x /J Vey` / l„ d ''- I S� EL I \ \ • ri/ \ \ ., .o' Id er,,......., s' �„ �.���. EesE„E.,s o ,n cc iz ---__________ ....!, ,,,4. -. ___,...._:_x_____;,./..., ,---7 1".50' N I— cc z ��\ ,. �� ?;:/ ` PHASE IV //ymAL �� N,/ \ \ .....e. ee. / ��3 / i,° SHEET 4 of _,o -, -e, • �/ \ j \ ... EXISTIN TOPOGRAPHY PLAN .._e00:0 03 MATCHLINE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DI\ ION : ' • ii APPROVED 1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED 6-34,_D 1,7b, (_.„,_._ 5.--)---ad-- ----- ,_" j •t (:1,...--L-g-e- ,5 Li ,,. • ( Z k. --r•z..:: iff ( 11 :.- ' --' r Ail,,- ?Ty OF REN750N __ n OCT 291997 OWING 1 ZONING, udi. DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1. REVOSION 6/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : / 6y Ei APPROVED 111 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ri NOT APPROVED A/29 - t DATE: //1.--9-77 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Bc-06 ri APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS F1 NOT APPROVED -7 4 / 5.- 9 ,.577 .--• ();,--7e---A9 "-L,/-zzed Ai --(./ ,Z 7 ( 77 -- -, el.--.;- -- '7:=7•C__.-- /4-7 ?? 7.Q.....___. DATE: ,"-7.---2 :7 /7 1 j SIGNATURE OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZE" REPRESENTATIVE c___-.--- REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DI1 ION : j �� U,/ El APPROVED flAPPROVEDWITH ONDITIONS NOT APPROVED , DATE: �( SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE COMMENTS %) tittiz, C vt Ai ‘04.44.- r twtC MI- DV $a L1 'tut1,(20 vtA:sYi Adir l e?-661A`tt -veh4b," . 3) -4 a-m &.&' ' mi l'k -i i LKeicivo efftw.,e, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature f Director or ,iuthorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : F►r� ��«-�r� ����E„� El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED CepI) ea ,2.;, ityez,„a„ezz-yre.„_4„-_, hi) az€7_,„4‘,,wr__4_,Aa„. , aez ,boa 441,_ f.,&r.-64-e, ,let6c ..e.g /1-61c4 C DATE , ? /7.Z.7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIEVI OON 6/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION / / v • APPROVED LI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED rs P� As presented at this -junct .ra, the environmental issues outlined go beyond a conditional approval. If the project proponents could improve their project concept so that the conditions do not require redesign, but rather modification of a basically acceptable concept, then conditions could be reasonably suggested. • et( SIGNATUR IF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE COmmENTS: This projectas proposed will have major recreation, non—motorized circulation, and aesthetic impacts. • The plan provides for no significant useable passive recreation open space. The need for this is underscored by the fact that on a nice summer day one can observe workers throwing frisbies in the congested parking lots of First Cities' Phase 1, 2, and 3 projects. If it was designed properly, one open space could not only service the passive recreation needs of all three buildings, but it could also function as a unifyin€ element for the entire site. The open space unifying buildings C & D is a beginning, but it should be expanded. Further, because of this site's close proximity to the proposed Springbrook and Black River Trail systems, shower facilites should be included to accommodate those people who will make active use of those trails during their lunch hours. There is no significant pedestrian circulation system proposed. This is especially a problem between the buildings on the site. The proposed design allows parking and the misuse of landscaping to segregate and disjoint the site. No provisions have been made for bicycle parking even though sixteen bicycles can be accommodated by the average parking space required by a standard American automobile. The landscaping misses its potential to help create a pedestrian and auto focal point for the site and instead serves more to break the site up, hide it or act as a barrier. The effect of this is not to be under estimated when the signifi— cance of Oakesdale Avenue as a major Renton new arterial is considered. The connecting road between this phase and the existing phases needs to include pedestrian facilities and be given a landscape treatment that helps unify the two sites. To experience all the shortcomings of the proposed plan all one has to do it drive or walk through Phases I, II, III, and IV. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /2r/L/T ' A/6-//JE /AI& El APPROVED ri APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS g I NOT APPROVED fie( �S A4e o 1.r1 tot MLR APPROVAL Sr-7'1-1 ge_o � Yv-eetr�e���.�� ,��� BATE C&IMS AGREE::: 1VAT e. AJ / LATECOMERS AGREE:. ....sM*1 y.Es 5- 323 &r 7 /-/d/:CN eel-) r l.3, 4 S 7. F-3 MIEN DEVE IaiPiEIIT C:... INATZ yes $0. D /s�7. x.�9(,, 772 �.�; g'7J.88 SYSTEM DEVELOPI : ` , ,® � A"T 3 F70•se SPECIAL ASSESSf 3Sl.7 f.: • tiV16. D A/c 4 / 76 OEM iSSESSMET 1:.- �_. S.O.A2Z. AlO APPROVED WATER Pl.a,l .._t. y_ CPPi:.:ER SEWER P11.1 r� � liHROKO FIRE ITO6I114,;:i - i A. Agih, C771. 124ee24(4 g'Lo l St . I STGNATIIRF nF T)TRFCTnR (lR IORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVIEKING DEPARTMENT/DIVI-1N ; ./ i=, / F/ i(- --''' '/1/ 7A/C- 11 APPROVED ['APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED A Ifa-c. ry RENTm OCT 291981 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. Cl" DATE /c 7/r 2� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AU HORIZED EPRESENTATIVE REVBSBO'3 5/1982 Form 182 Z I U a-t9- ; e M ; 1 --a„ v T va1,►spa + fi I e 1,1 S 5t.e.1) 62-7- MI...Z.,/1v 13(A5 1,5 A iv D 44.-P4-, •r y E O :,liar��/�aa�J Q� �'� �d..`'�`� "� Ps ra E. lSD ,�::. � ,r E. 1 c 3® 7s--6 ,s OCT291 U D19 ‘00 liu �..a�/� ;f'�,q�'�',1('.i pr" ' • 3T_ Afof Tess 11-€. ,. n S d.d v � D o 0 L5-1—P0/419A1A fD CAv /�1 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV ON ; L►'UIWe . ri APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT' APPROVED SEC P. Mr��n1'f — 3At - C)o nnynn eN-is • DATEo SIGNATURE OF DIRECIp OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE n eLOCKIC- bUIL,t' l kk IU O �'' ( aiI0ARD )N COR. E:R ,sPlE Root,; GT cGI.puo0S Zo iz-- l-OC,NTe DR_Iawn-( 0A.)-(0 k 'Ex u� ITv) ER,GN-( ° IP.>u k,toi(v(o 0c) ' •, ' Ns )1 Cis URC1-W65 100 GuisI,gcl "TC) oto (- .f srr`INO ()Risky-id° lk 5l-AvUl,0 136 C1\)Gv.N-PsCo4p 1)u;)c,LUD'L.- PIbIUI() -7jr: .., � �� NTIIu6 /espcS., L►�c‘Vo4 C o-rfar )w000T .( 24"- ") IK) �oC VyAlooL,(i U,c Th Slim i PRopof2U) 10 ttGrt avdv0 rYf 1116 Doi6Uorklz I6K, -)1+6 FIk1Al� 6R \-)(o"rolo 91s,RV(, Rr-(U Ion; e A� yvn0,0\ 1355)V4-- - SHOULD ( . Oom-E o z)G m t Nib:1,16 6 3--/kuI, 10 Tl1-6 317G- pl,AN S1�Ul�<✓� 13C 1 uC Iry oR,D.r `]O P o ))of Surd iCI00-( urrl. IZorownC o • o 10 Lf ,YauT dr PNR,KIrvto NJU NR.opes bu)tbitO6S. .SHouu0 kE CSC-' yI4C J-LCo C__G EU Gt1 s" • 'CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-078-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SM-013-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three- story buildings having 74 , 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline develop- ment permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-i channel. PROPONENT: First City Equities LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on February 1, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filling fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: January 13, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 18, 1988 Donald G. Nelson arry Spriny r Building and Zoning Director Policy velop 1 nt= Director 1)1 , / ichard C Houghton Public Works Director • • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-078-87 APPLICATION NO. : SMo013-87, SA-090-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three- story buildings having 74,000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. CONDITIONS: 1. That efforts be taken to preserve the wildlife habitat provided by major trees on the two sited by reducing the amount of surface parking provided (up to 25% of required parking can be set aside in landscaped reserve areas) and rearranging vehicular circulation patterns if necessary. Note to applicant: When the applicant can show the City°s landscape architect that new tree plantings have matured to a point where they provide an equivalent or better wildlife habitat, some of these existing. trees could be removed. 2 . That impervious surfaces not be allowed to intrude within the drip line area of existing specimen trees being retained on these two sites. 3 . That additional on-site recreational amenities (indoor and outdoor) be provided to the satisfaction of the City°s landscape architect in both phases of development for the use of the project's estimated 620 plus employees. 4 . That all surface water drainage untreated by grass-lined swales be processed through oil/water separators approved by the Public Works Department. A CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 A.M. ON FEBRUARY 16, 1988: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK-PHASE IV & V Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 600 sq. ft and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S>W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. (File nos. ECF-078-87; SA-090-87; SM-013-87) lstcitydsk:a:ag21688 I c Architecture and Planning Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street, Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 December 31, 1987 CITY AEI V E C Mr. Don Erickson, AICP (1► Zoning Administrator and DEC 44'9 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton BUILDING I ZONING ®EPA'. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Phases IV and V Files SA-090-87 & SM-013-87 & ECF-078-87 Original Submittal October 13, 1987 ERC letter November 30, 1987 ERC determination of non-significance dated December 21, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: 1Per review of the ERC's determination of non-significance, we disagree with the conditions and find them "unreasonable and not acceptable. " The following comments are submitted for additional information and conjunction with our previous letter dated December 8, 1987. This letter is submitted to ERC for reconsideration prior to final issuance of declaration of non-significance and prior to the appeal period. CONDITION 1 1. Additional drainage swales on this phase of the site are unreasonable and are not required and affect the developable rights of the owner, especially in conjunction with the past approvals and direction by the City of Renton. A. All drainage for this phase of development flows to Oakesdale, to 7th, to Naches and into the existing biofiltering swale and then into the P-1 pond, this is adequate to filter this phase of development plus additional future phases_ and the Black River (north half) of the total development. Reference attached letter from Entranco Engineers. Forcing unnecessary additional biofiltering on this phase of development is not necessary. (1) The land for Oakesdale Avenue was dedicated to the City by FCE. (2) The prime participant for the LID for Oakesdale was FCE. (3) The drainage system in the street was designed to service this phase of development and paid for through the LID for Oakesdale. (4) The improvements for storm drainage in the street besides being paid for (majority) by the owner (FCE) are in addition, subject %i , rage 2 to assessment charges for use, which were appealed and denied by the hearing examiner FCE paid for the storm line, pays to use the storm line and should be allowed to use the storm line as originally planned, I biofiltering of water will occur and will be adequate at Naches without additional biofiltering swales added to this phase. The City itself drains Oakesdale directly into the P-1 Channel with limited biofiltering before entering the P-1 Channel. Why should this development phase be required to do any more than the City requires of itself. The proposal, however does not reflect using direct access to the P-1 Channel for storm drainage, but ties into a biofiltering system planned, programmed and adequate to serve these sites. 2. We request condition 1 be eliminated. CONDITION 2 1. Efforts have already been taken to preserve wildlife habitat and existing significant trees have been preserved to the maximum extent possible. �/ �N Reference LPN letter dated December 8, 1987, attached. Additional di efforts will be made in the SE section �S of Phase IV, Buildings A and B, to lsi preserve additional trees through final balance of required parking per low/1 building s.f. per the City's definition of gross building area. The ' planning for this development occurs today in order to develop the property. We see no reason to remove any of the retained trees in the future unless for safety reasons. 2. The use of landscape preserves for reducing parking is a good planning 1°1S; tool for development when the owner has some control on parking and the gm tenancy in the buildings. In multi-tenant buildings minimizing parking 4'eY ( below code and what is acceptable in the market takes the development out of the market. Considering the process it takes to obtain permits and approvals for buildings, this is not a viable option and places an unreasonable restraint on development that is not required by code or ordinance. 3. The LID for Oakesdale had an initial budget of $20,975 for landscaping as established by the City of Renton. This was inadequate to do anything but seed the LID areas. FCE has contributed the difference in costs to establish $170,694 to enhance the landscaping along Oakesdale, on this side of the property, and along the P-1 Channel. This includes three inch caliper trees and irrigationl systems. These contribute greatly to enhanced wildlife habitats and has already been planted through the additional efforts and costs of FCE (owner) . 4. We request condition 2 be eliminated as extensive planning efforts have mitigated and preserved the majority of on site trees and supplemented the street and P-1 Channel areas (in addition to the proposed landscape concepts submitted) . Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 , 1 Page 3 CONDITION 3 1. "Impervious surfaces not be allowed to intrude within the drip line of existing trees, " this is an acceptable condition - however in some cases intrusion can be tolerated and needs to be reviewed by landscape architects on an individual basis. CONDITION 4 1. On site amenities are described in the (attached) LPN letter December 8, 1987, item 3 and are acceptable as defined as a condition. Leaving an "open ended" program to "the satisfaction of the city landscape architect" is unreasonable and uTidefinable. In addition to the items referenced to be provided, shower facilities will be provided in this phase of development. The jogging trail referenced under construction in the letter is being paid for by FCE (owner) above the LID costs and needs to be considered part of this phase of development as an amenity. 2. We request this condition be revised to reflect the items as defined in the LPN letter. CONDITION 5 1. Condition 5 is acceptable, however, oil water separations are already required as a standard by the City of Renton and probably does not have to be included as a condition. Respectfully, L' . •CHI .� CTS & PLANNERS I Ro{ e A. Ber P/sident / RAB: clp Enclosures: Ltr. Entranco Engineers, December 10, 1987 Ltr. LPN Architects, October 27, 1987, November 3, 1987, December 8, 1987 Ltr. BRH, December 31, 1987 cc: Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Schuman, First City Equities Barbara Moss, First City Equities David Morency, Entranco Engineers Bob Roed, Bush, Roed, & Hitchings Charles Blumenfeld Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127,Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 ULti. J1 Of 11•GODIN?Ill CUV .JLJ I lJJ BUSH, RQ ,1..► & HITCHINGS, INC. 2009 Minor Avenue east Seattle, Washington 98102 - ^ Area 206/ 323-4144 • December 31, 1987 Royce Berg I �g��Leeson Pomeroy. Northwest 1127 Pine, Suite 300 DEC 31 :817anners Seattle, WA 98101RE: Blackriver Corp. Park LPN Architects Storm Drainage Dear Royce: I am writing this letter to explain the, reasons behind the storm drainage system design for that portion of the Blackriver Development within the plat of Washington Technical Center. Basically the plat consists of the property bounded on the east by Powell Avenue, on the south by Grady Way, on the west by 0akesdale Avenue, and extending approximately 600 feet north of SW 7th Street. As directed by the Hearing Examiner's Report and recommendation for the plat approval under file No. PP-056-80, compliance with the conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee was mandatory. Listed below are numbers 5, 6 & 7 of the ERC conditions relating to storm drainage. 5. Dedicate an easement for storm drainage along the north property line from the northeast corner of the site to the Black River channel. 6e Direct all storm drainage from the site east of Springbrook Creek to the upstream end of the old Black Riverl channel for the purpose of wetland treatment (as per the water quality impact assessment). 7. Extend the existing storm sewer line of the site (in a appropriate size) northwestward to the upstream end of the old Black River channel. To comply with the above conditions the following storm drainage network was established. • A. Area north of SW 7th Street and easi of Powell Avenue SW was designed to discharge directly to an open ditch along the north property line via pipe in Powell Avenue. B. Area north of 7th Street between Neches Avenue and Powell Avenue drainage system discharges partially into the ditch along the north . property line and partially into a pipe in Neches .which discharges into the above mentioditch. C. Area north of 7th Street between Neches Avenue & P-1 channel to be drained via pipe in 7th Street and Neches to said open ditch on north property line. CIVIL ENGINEERS/LAND SURVEYORS Elackriver Corp. Park December 31, 1987 Page 2 D. Area south of 7th Street between Powell Avenue & Oakesdale Avenue was divided into three major drainage systems. 1. The South one-fourth of the area has to drain to the south because the topographic features made it impossible to drain northerly to the old Black River channel per the ERC condition number 6. 2. The area along Powell Avenue and 7th Street drains to a pipe installed during the first phase of development by the HdK Company. This pipe which is 300 feet west of Powell connects into the pipe installed in 7th Street which in turn connects to the pipe in Naches. 3. Remaining portion of drainage discharges into the storm sewer pipe built as part of the Oakesdale Avenue SW project. This portion of the Oakesdale Avenue system connects into the large 60 inch pipe in Naches Avenue via 7th Street. The surface water runoff collected by the above drainage systems discharge into the old Black River channel per Condition Number 6 imposed on this property by the Environmental Review Committee except that small area lying in the extreme southerly portion of the project. The major purpose for directing the runoff to the upstream and of the old Black River channel via the extension of the existing 60 inch storm sewer line in Naches was to have the surface water runoff flow through the old channel for "wetland treatment" before discharging into the P-1 Channel/Pond drainage system Sincer , ii5z52 obert M. oed RMR/scr 4 {�� t, ,; `•�r� Tn! .X'4,^' k r cA Jtrh �';1 t 1+ ":tl• / - j N --iyj�y t,4 r+�. h ¢1 t t+'j••t j t i` i!� •T.! 1 r _ p ' . fro ' }7!• �' 7. . j4�i,.,.1J ,641-, may .:. • K 4•.: {+1 r r ti iv,; ,. ,, .j c M 4 3. ,,1 a ;`,r,, c'.,,1. t ✓rk 1 a ' r r-�i•• ` r ,. r� s„i,F ,� : �, {' •t , et''° 11V19 u :x� �31*. ,r p, y. : t ,) '4,f t a. a n T ' �u�r'g t 14 rroH F :'w{ 'Tj�t�f .t 7 1 a''ky a va'(�r 1.�2•r n r�7r , r • �',1: �r ¢ a r;'r, • Iti7.4.t't t4�[ 4; ' >tteL ii;,,14.1 � c ,,l•PA,4y0,4 J,x, 4• `• ,$j : S3'tu �4'.1 : sg .,4'1' �+ k} ,ah ctr3 trt4 tie•• fri',t'r 41r t,• 4A , •S f 'TS i� � , {.r ,. -�}' t r. : �4, .. 1 rA- • �; f4-t �-:.p Atc tijC �i'l,•T=er. , �yt• •.� r 'hf •4 ;' 4 4$s°1,c:-I ..,i.dy 45tc,' 1"4 td 4 rt 4 ter �l YT, r.tiro ; r- '. i ,. ••�r4 "'•` t: tpii tNei,tioiriy f�ibrtylivoil ti16'ri Roy fA,.tierg,'1A,1 A 112. PgIO,Streef,-Suite 300 Seattle,,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 December 8, 1987 Mr. Don Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator and • Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South 1 Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Phases IV and V Files SA-090-87. & SM-013-87 Original Submitted October 13, 1987 , ERC letter November 30, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: The following comments are submitted per your letter of November 30, 1987 as additional information to be included with the ERC Committee's final recommendation to the Hearing Examiner and City Council. We appreciate your comments and in ,keeping with the phases already established we believe Phases IV and V will also result in the higher quality we seek for the Blackriver Corporate Park, development. 1. Water Quality/Wetlands: Water drainage for these sites will flow to Oakesdale north to 7th, east to Naches, and north to the swale for biofiltering before entering into the P-1 Channel. Per City of Renton direction and per original EIS for property and per storm lines installed in Oakesdale LID by FCE and Renton for this specific purpose. This system has been reviewed in context with the overall development and the existing biofiltering swale off Naches is adequate to accommodate these sites and other areas of the total development. A specific analysis is attached to this letter with a report by the project environmental engineer, David Morency of Entranco Engineers. Oil/water separators will be installed per City standards. (See attached report) 2. Glare: All glass reflects at certain angles of incidence. Bumpers on cars, windshields on cars, also reflect light at times when hit in certain manners. The use of "reflective glass" evolved from the energy crisis this nation entered and provides an efficient means to control heat gain in buildings, which is the dominant use of energy in office buildings (even in the northwest). Phase II on Powell Avenue of this development currently exists with reflective glass elements on three stories of the buildings, 45% outward reflectance) as do. other buildings in the City of Renton with no adverse impacts on the adjacent "micro climate". • Mr. Don Erickson Page Two December 8, 1987 There is no inclined re tive lass on this building, all glass is vertical and a 1 reflective glass will be kept at or elow the 23% outward reflectance which is the middle of the range. Reflective glass besides having energy efficient aspects also allows a building to change colors and tones depending on the weather and time of day which provides aesthetic value and interest to the building. Reflective glass will not be used at the major entry points to the buildings, tinted vision glass will be used. ' 3. Recreation: Benches and outdoor seating. The drawings did not reflect amenity areas; the intent was as follows: Phase Four, Bldgs. A & B, 3 Story Office — Two benches and paved sitting areas at each major entry of each building. Two benches and a paved sitting area to be provided at the southeast corner of this phase in the extra landscape area. In addition, raised planter walls will provide seating at the main entry at side. Phase Five, Bldgs. C & D — Two benches and a paved sitting area will be provided at the main plaza between the buildings. Two benches and a paved sitting area will be located in the landscape area along the trees at Oakesdale Avenue. Recreational activities like jogging will connect within the master plan when all master plan issues are resolved. A master plan concept for these areas was submitted over a year ago to the City but could not be processed by the City. These items will be developed per phase of development. The jogging trail for this phase is under construction west of. Oakesdale and paid for by First City Equities in the LID. These trails ultimately will connect to Blackriver Corporate Park trails and should connect with City trails and other trails to Fort Dent Recreational Park which is within a mile of this phase of development. 4. Retention of Existing Trees As many of the existing trees as possible were saved through our site planning process and were reviewed by which areas of preservation would provide a balance of significant trees to soften the edges of development along the public streetscape and the property boundary lines. In addition 13 small trees will be relocated along the property lines to provide additional mature landscaping. 72% of the existing trees are retained or relocated. In addition, special effort was made by First City Equities to preserve large trees and adjacent trees in the Soils Conservation fill—setback area (200 ft. into property) when the City of Renton finished excavating the P-1 Channel. No require— ments were placed on the City to preserve these trees. In addition new Leason Pomeroy Northwest.Inc., Royce A. Berg.A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Mr. Don Erickson Page Three December 8, 1987 trees and are to be installed in the landscape areas. which plantings P will dramatically increase the number of trees on the site. The following is a tabulation of saved trees. Existing Trees Phase IV Phase V (clusters count as one tree) Preserved: ' 11 9 (4 are clusters) (6 are clusters) Relocated: 13 • 0 Removed: 9 3 (+ 1 row of deciduous) = 4 % Preserved or Relocated ±73% ±69% Overall Average = ±72% preserved or relocated Per Existing Tree Survey: 46 trees shown (dense hedgerow of smaller deciduous trees running east and west counted as 1 tree) Landscape Open Space: Phase IV 25% Provided Phase V 28% Provided Required 20% It should be noted that Cottonwood trees are messy trees and contaminate the screens of heating and air conditioning units as well as clogging roof drains when left too close to buildings. They also clog catch basins in the streets and 'parking lots. This is one of the reasons the City of Renton would not allow street trees in the medians when Oakesdale was designed. The roots are close to the surface and ultimately raise paving and invade water, sewer and storm lines. We have complied with recommended mitligation measures and have saved as many trees as possible in areas we feel benefit the development and community the best. There are no requirements which mandate preservation of all trees except FCE preservation areas for the Riparian Forest one half mile to the north of this property and not part of this submittal. We have exceeded the minimum landscape requirement of 20% to 25% at Phase IV, Buildings A and B; and 28% at Phase V, Buildings C and D in order to preserve this amount of trees. Lemon Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A.. 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300'Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 • Mr. Don Erickson Page Four December 8, 1987 5. Access Access to these sites (ingress and egress) are dictated by previous comments in public hearings by the Fire Marshall of the City of Renton, and the Oakesdale LID. Development of Phases I and II provided access points to this phase for emergency vehicle access to Oakesdale from Powell Avenue. The major east—west access aisles reflect this and dictate basic on site circulation. Access to Oakesdale was limited to t1 a access points shown. We have added one additional curb cut for right in and right out for Buildings, A and B. This curb cut aligned further north originally (and can still be an alternate approach, per attached sketch reflecting major on ',site vehicular lanes) but shifted to the south to avoid relocating a fire hydrant. On site circulation allows north—south access between sites but does not encourage high speed direct lanes (which are not desirable on site). Pedestrian access has been provided between buildings, from buildings to the sidewalks on the street and a major east—west access walk was provided to the adjacent properties 'iand phases into Oakesdale.. We see no need for additional walks. and prefer to keep as much area in pervious surface and landscaping as possible and maintain rights to develop this property per marketing and allowed use per zoning. Parking amounts meet City code requirements of 1/200 SF of building and provide a reasonable balance of allocation to each building yet providing different exposures for buildings. Respectfully, LPN ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 1/1 Ro ce A. Berg P esident RAB:cpm Enclosures: Ltr. •Entranco Engineers Ltr. LPN Architect's, October 27, 1987 Ltr. LPN Architects, November 3, 1987 ' LPN site plan reduction reflecting alternate access point to site cc: Barbara Moss, First City Equities ' ' Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director ' Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Schuman, First.City Equities Lemon Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A.Berg.A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583 8030 ENTRANCO ENGINEERS,INC. [t LAKE WASHINGTON PARK BUILDING (208)827-1300 December 10, 1987 5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E., KIRKLAND,WA 98033 Barbara Moss, Director of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: Phase 4 and 5 Development, Area 2 Treatment of Stormwater Runoff Black River Corporate Park Entranco Project No. 87116-60 Dear Barbara: The purpose of this correspondence is to provide an evaluation of the probable water quality treatment effectiveness of the present storm drainage plan for the Black River Corporate Park (refer to the recently revised plan dated 12/10/87, enclosed) . The new plan would involve the construction of approximately 4,100 feet of drainage swales or biofilters for the treatment of stormwater runoff. The value of these areas as wildlife habitat is also addressed in this letter. 'I n order to simplify the discussion of these issues I have divided the site into five major drainage areas and have numbered them accordingly (refer to enclosed drainage plans) . Please note that whenever I refer to the "EIS" in this discussion I am referring to the water quality appendices of the Earlington Park (1981) and Black River Office Park (1982) Final EISs where the original stormwater treatment concept was presented. In my opinion, effective stormwater treatment will be provided for all areas of the site except for Area 3 and some runoff from S.W. Oakesdale Avenue that will drain directly into Springbrook Creek and the P-1 Pond without treatment. The absence of stormwater treatment in Area 3 could be addressed by providing, additional open swale (biofilter) drainage to replace underground storm drains. However, it should be noted that in the original EIS it was assumed that no treatment would be provided for this area. It was also assumed that the relatively small amount of untreated runoff from this area would not have any significant adverse impact on water quality in the P-1 Pond - in part due to the small volume of runoff compared to total flows in Springbrook Creek (i .e. , due to the benefit of dilution) , and in part because existing water quality in Springbrook Creek is already significantly degraded. The provision of approximately 2,100 feet of biofilter swale area for Area 1 runoff will represent a significant improvement in stormwater treatment compared to the original EIS drainage plan. In the original EIS it was assumed that runoff from this area would be treated in the old Black River Channel wetlands along with other site runoff. EVERETT OFFICE 516 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING (206)258 6202 I602 HEWITT AVENUE.EVERETT.WA 98201 di 1110 Ms. Barbara Moss December 10, 1987 Page 2 Assuming that the width of the biofilter swale will vary from 20 to 40 feet, the total amount of new treatment area will be about 1 to 2 acres. On the basis of design criteria employed in the original EIS, this amount of wetland area should be more than sufficient to remove pollutant fractions associated with particles of 43 microns or greater. This means that pollutant removal rates should be in the range of 60 to 90 percent for most pollutants (refer to Tables 1 and 2) . [It should be noted that a basic premise of the design approach is to provide sufficient sedimentation (treatment) area to treat the 1- to 2-year design storm and that storms of greater magnitude and lower return frequency (e.g. , once in 5 or more years) would receive lower treatment.] The location of these biofilter swales will be along the margin of the riparian forest preserve, as shown in the enclosed drainage plan. This location will promote groundwater recharge of stormwater runoff and will also make it possible to divert overflow runoff into the riparian forest area. Groundwater recharge and surface water diversion through the riparian forest should assist in preserving the forest habitat and may even result in the creation of a more definitive wetland habitat. However, care should be taken in the design of drainage facilities in this area so that overflow runoff is routed into and through the riparian forest in such a manner as to avoid channelization of flow and creation of erosion and sedimentation problems in the P-1 pond. Drainage control in Area 2 has been affected by loss of old Black River Channel wetlands, as previously mentioned. One out of the three original acres of wetland was lost during construction of the P-1 Pond, and another acre will be filled by First City Equities in conjunction with construction of buildings and parking areas. The latter filling by First City Equities will occur in a manner consistent with the plan that was approved in the original EIS. Although this loss of wetland area will result in some reduction in treatment efficiency, the remaining wetland area is still sufficient to provide an adequate degree of stormwater treatment. On the basis of the original ' EIS stormwater treatment criteria, I have determined that adequate treatment area is available to remove the 40-micron particle size and larger, providing 60 to 90 percent pollutant , removal efficiencies for most pollutants. Again, I refer you to Tables 1 and 2 as the basis for these criteria. This analysis included treatment of off-site runoff that is conveyed to the old Black River Channel via the existing 60-inch storm drain. On the basis of Table 1 criteria, 145 square feet of sedimentation area is required per cfs of flow to remove particle fractions of the 40-micron size and greater. For the 110 cfs flow originally calculated in the EIS, this computes to approximately 16,000 square feet. On the basis of these criteria, the one acre (43,560 square feet) of remaining wetlands should provide adequate stormwater treatment. In order for treatment to be provided effectively, however, I recommend Ms. Barbara Moss • December 10, 1987 Page 3 that a gabion-type structure be located at the outlet of the old Black River Channel where it discharges into the P-1 Pond. This will have the effect of creating standing water conditions behind (upstream of) the gabion and increasing the surface area and effectiveness of wetland treatment contact. Other factors tending to enhance treatment in the remaining wetland area include: (1) a reduction in the total volume of runoff that will be treated in this area (a significant volume of runoff will be treated within Area 1 and will not be routed to the old Black River Channel wetlands as originally planned) ; and (2) additional treatment area (1,500 feet x 20 feet) that will be provided in the form of new biofilter drainage swales located east of Nachess Avenue S.W. : (about 750 feet of this swale has already been constructed) . Stormwater runoff from Areas 4 and 5 will also discharge to biofilter swales and will receive adequate treatment. In summary, I find that the presently proposed storm drainage plan will actually result in enhanced treatment of stormwater runoff from the Black River Corporate Park as compared to the plan originally proposed in the EIS. Adequate treatment will also be provided for off-site runoff, and I do not anticipate any significant increases in pollutant concentrations in Springbrook Creek or the P-1 Pond as a result of development of the site as proposed. Sincerely, ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC. �til / J ( David A. Morency Associate DAM:gg Enclosures • • Entranco Engineers, Inc. December 10, 1987 TABLE 1 Minimum Sediment Basin Area Requirements for Selected Particles (per cfs Outflow Rate) Particle Minimum Area Kind of Diameter - Required Material (micron) (sq. ft.) Coarse sand 1,000 3.0 Coarse sand 200 14.5 Fine sand 100 38.2 Fine sand 60 80.0 Fine sand 40 145.0 Silt 10 2,030.0 Coarse clay 1 203,000.0 Fine clay 0.1 20,300,000.0 Source: American Public Works Association, 1974. Practices in Detention of Urban Stormwater Runoff. Special Report No. 43. • Entranco Engineers, Inc. December 10, 1987 TABLE 2 Fraction of Pollutant Associated with each Particle Size Range (Percent by Weight) PARTICLE SIZE (u) 2,000 840 -> 2,000 246 -> 840 104 -> 246 43 -> 104 <43 Total Solids 24.4 7.6 24.6 27.8 9.7 5.9 Volatile Solids 11.0 17.4 12.0 16.1 17.9 25.6 B0D5 7.4 20.1 15.7 15.2 17.3 24.3 COD 2.4 4.5 13.0 12.4 45.0 22.7 Kjeldahl Nitrogen 9.9 11.6 20.0 20.2 19.6 18.7 Nitrates 8.6 6.5 7.9 16.7 28.4 31.9 Phosphates , 0 0.9 6.9 6.4 29.6 56.2 Total Heavy Metals 16.3 17.5. 14.9. 23.5 27.8 Total Pesticides 0 16.0 26.5 25.8 31.7 Source: U.S. EPA, 1972. Water Pollution Aspects of Street Surface EPA- Contaminants, EPA-R2-72-081. . RAILROAD TRACK{ • ..j us......•,,,,,,1„•„ • /r. 0 ••j � BLACKR! R CORPORATE PARK �•••• - 1 ([LAC RIV[R OFFIC[PARK) \ t.• N %• /" r,pifr, ..�.�''��, \ \.,, BIOFILTER SWALE (TYP.) , �e•.i.p,;, ,I ,,�1,.q,.R[APUBLI[AS EHT•••`-�C II.ATONAL ••% :•� t_• ,i s,,!,•,\ 0 . .. ... us us r�`!���/i',0D9dia IAO�L -4 •• •• 'A u, rya•1 ••,,,,•( 4—PLIMP-1TATION P-1 POND \01.// {j TT .••/� '� BLACKRIVER COR- 1- TE PARK/' • �y, ,,,,.,.• /� \/ �� .._ / (VALLEY 406 SUSHI $PARR) / ,,,,..,,T . !! , /- r . J 2 - . - O �\\` s..n . SW 7TH c �►ir�� c ra �� ../; FLOWN (TYP.)I DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY (TYP.) a 41)#%,\\ -i1 it . '1 i a 2 J r - -STORM DRAINAGE W - . ;\:\t,M . . • �L�CKRIVS� : `'' Corporate Park i 1` : ,Dio 0. EN M RTOH,WASHOTON - . $M II i 1,( ) ii . . . OOP' .0,- - NORTH 12-10-87 t/ 4 f ti Y • ' 'Y ?:f""jy.�i�r��'q � �nr 4�`Y'.t'•+`l ` _ r}lt{'- ��1 ry i t .t : rr,4%,s1" ite Pew ' . x + ' ti i 7}~r T � 1 1-r 1,- " 0117k i ?(\yft�•' f1. ^M1 �fi la'. :1 r + ,. { • • leesbn romorey Norlhwe4(,Inc.,foycn A.Barg,h.I.A I i ?.y Vinci'trr r;l atilfo inn,or+inf•.WA(mint PC0N33,nn:10 November 3, 1987 ENA COURIERS Mr. Jerry Lind Planning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Phase IV and Phase V — Drainage Site Approval Submittal — SA-090-87 Environmental Checklist — ECF-078-871 Shoreline Permit - SM-018-87 Dear Jerry: Per your conversation with Barbara Moss regarding the conflict in the Environmental Checklist and drainage drawing, the checklist is correct. All drainage for the Phases IV and V .sites.:will ' go north — into Oakesdale, 7th, and Naches respectively and biofilter.ed,.;i.n:'an ;open swale before entering the P-1 Pond. Attached is a revised print reflecting the grading and a revised reduction of the grading for your use. Respectfully, 4a 4 Ro a A. Berg P sident RAB:cpm Enclosure cc: Barbara Moss . Mark Miller David Schuman Ken Chin .. .....L. —a -..4 . Y L a ;;. - ---------- ---- o I "'� •1 ,,,��, s•J l t!i I I!I I!t 4171�1Tr1'(T1�1i f{117!r • • . . 42..:>, >>: - - I l� . 1 !MU$% aif A M • , _ .,, �,olti maw • - _ • • . ., - .- . . „ . .,. .1\ .,- lino: ....._ ..„ , - ,,,.s •,- 1 V,-. ..- - At:t. - .. __, .. . _ .....:004. .„. .... . •---- • . ...., • N\y/i • '1 .i . . -- : BLACKRIVER - • CORPORATE PARK "°"'" V _ • RENTON WASHINGTON ..•.4 . ._ - i FIRST CITY EOUfigS pri. . . n NO /00f — PHASE IV 8 V -- .- ....o MA wo.oanwoon .0 o I ben ro v Ma„ • 1 r�4t;{{'' ��s i "�.v !+ 1 ii{ b L+ 1 L.1) r�' ,tj y��t5L�t-�i1 i s r z 1 NI-4 re i ' h R r y }�(� z• v, 11 kr C t 4 liF + r",, , ♦r {:%pis q � =C�lre���)CI1t1If1g r \ 1 �� r f. .t r t � 1 �. 441er.nt +�h ItC rvt.ar 1 ti�� A �1 ( ,rrti��+4%.1i;11 l(±r 4{ (--i- .. 4�.'rn r •. nit tj:`I rS! •+n't. jnf.! • +ti�.(�.�.yZX�I •j • tom". • ,. ;"{ .4� :',.% JS• +41..• y. 1 P r'*•••' }(!l 3 Ih i a(ir ,•'+,•• • .•' ..• , 0 i p • �a lesson Pomeroy Notihwest,Inc„Royce A.Berg,A.I.A 1127 Pine Street.Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101(206)583 8030 FIRST CITY EQUITIES 1:. , October 27, 1987 OCT 2 8 1987 Mr. Jerry Lind Department of Building & Zoning City of Renton 1 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase IV and V , Site Plan Review (No. SA-090-87), Landscape Requirements Dear Jerry: Pursuant to the Renton Building Regulations, Section 4-718(C)5,c, requiring a minimum of 20% of the site to be retained in landscaped open spaces, our current proposed landscaped open spaces are: 1. Phase IV: + 100,770 S.F. = 25% 2. Phase V: + 54,450 S.F. = 28% The above areas are exclusive of all proposed walks and paved areas, and exceed the 20% required areas. Final drawings will vary in amounts but will be over 20%. Please do not hesitate to call if there. are any questions. Si ncerel t I(.IL� (Li. i Y, Ken K. Chin, AIA YKKCcpm ' cc: Barbara Moss . Mark Miller III;''+ • t�.,,; jj ".""millra- 1„.1`�l-J° . " T 1' 'Y �'• 1 LJ ,„.• i%i.:' .`� �'t+ate•I i, '�4 p� f , 1 Ivy! t n i LI 11 .1...,A1:.1 : YV. :...;'- -, .t• . 5 , j i ..s.,1';,:j.4•,!..;,: S •\'...V"! f As Ili I -1 A I,' w •1 .. • , �., i' t p @ '; Lid i . 2,1 .. :',.7;,... i• t• • . .' i " a,.e ,..,.,..,,.. 1-,_:; ir..ar. , i • k. inn! • .'. - :.'.s..p'' • * 1;; . 11,\I ,! fil t1C .illy/ ,;,f• '. ;1 N. \ . rpr;firj.. .. •: 1.,----i- . . I • 0.;1 "`` — '�..; 'I; `im ►; •. i . a '1 !t�1l aryl? .j r1,,,, .. pr r ♦ , l .., i`i.• .1 f ` -.- .ii k .gyp•'• .`.N, �_ • •0 11 1,t •_ ',� I ..i-O• . • • % • olo • • Cr • �ii' ��r y i 1 i . • * i-ht i)7, .. ..4- ft jiii I S v. ,` ..,,•<,. .�. `,, `' ii :Lily i/� , 'ril"j •"4: ; it i . , i"_.--- c \. ? ice — I' t i i : •1 , ;}r.j •;:r Ram;,• 1 �1 � 1r l • I 1� ic. AV& \I'l . �i'111%{ - *i. D " _ -I . • 41/•4 „ . COi sis I Y • R u lf! .I.— •i Ii l \\-vv*,;,)� � • — 4) -,• Ise :11 '''',:.--: ';';'. • ' ' • •'. .:.:,.. [PI 1liC __t ' 1 f• �' I ill Iifl.i. ij tt •ills E is 1 z r: f] &, • 4 lI i ��'•t�.=::f.^ y'- •'i. 't 1 act t 1 f� i, .,K 1 .•l / l a • .. ',�� 'r ', Jr•i .r 1'. ' .1 pj 1! I: I..1.:..ss.:=JL.r.... Illb '� I ill. • • 1 .79 . :. •••,,,-••i-•... r.r, ���:.. u:.ii . ' ITIfittai/N/ii, allilliti _I= . 1 iiiii• in i 1 1 i E ..1.. . litt.../ 1 VP tc. , _ 1 I ;: • i : J.i 4;� 55 E ' I i 5 • b, , < \ \ \ 1 .I . k ' �� i 41 :ill" — . I El Ili . / ciAl.: • •!, . r.. i',.i:. we • 1 _.1. I liar"' . :• .53 M -;•.lif I.i 1.• .•:1 ,.-' )\7 V., IWIIIIII M� :;- fi I I •• �,, t p (4 3,NMM mu. . M 1 u tt , a0 3S , I' f Ci 1 M w• ii s I a 4 1 qf C $ i q. 1 i; I of `iiii P 3 .1, M. T i, a. 3■ i •y. r t 8 l rf I. • 1 C V �� _ t , • ;4r.. First cny EqultMs • ! 1 11 Blackriver Corporate Park . }�, I r, 1.=jt,1.1 g 1i ,. :}�.; PHASE IV V , 1 . ti 4 ,,,•;),.. ,i `' Renton,Washington V 1 • .ta.+S,�' NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- ;ware y Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states Significance — Mitigated for the following project(s)under the authority of the Renton that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. VALLEY DAILY NEWS FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK—PHASES IV&V) • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers having 74,000 square feet each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 square are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six feet and 19,Q00 square feet, and for sub- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published stantial shorelines development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King P-1 channel.Property located south of S.W. County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Avenue newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for SM 013i8e7 Nos. ECF-078-87, SA-090-87, King County. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. January 4, 1988, will not be considered. A The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- mence, Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in Themitigation followingthea finalizationmpo of DNS. The measures imposed by the supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers City'of Renton's Environmental Review during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Notice of Environmental Determination Renton,Washington. Phone 235-2540. Published in the Valley Daily News Dec. was published on December 21, 1987 R2 6 81 . 21, 1987.R2681. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 27 .2a • 7 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 3 rdday of Dec 19 8 Notat ublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. r:! ,r �_ ( _ �t:f. p,, VDN*87 Revised 11 86 _. `/, �i .. " V ! [i —•-_ _.. s 3 i,..;-\,9 8 y BU....UU:"'v /ZONING DEPT. • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Audrey Benner ,being first duly sworn on oath states RENTON,WASHINGTON that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated following project(s). VALLEY DAILY NEWS FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK—PHASE IV&V • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers one-stng 7a buil sg. h. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six and 19,000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published development permit to allow said develop- ment within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Prop- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King erty located south of S.W. 7th Street and County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. File Nos. newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ECF-078-87 information and aM-013 87. by p g Further information regarding this action King County. is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition action must be filed with the City of Renton Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition Hearing Examiner by February 1, 1988. (and not in Published in the Valley Daily News Janu- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers ary 18, 1988. R2753 during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of Environmental Determination was published on January 18, 1988 R2753 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ � . Subscribed and sworn to before me thi2 8th day of .TAT 19_ 88 ;- \!"1-;-N 17), Notary lic for the State of Washington, �fe G DEPT. residing at Federal Way, - King County, Washington. VON#87 Revised 11/86 4i ® CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM 1,1 N DATE: February 1, 1988 FEB 1 ISW TO: Fire Prevention Bureau FROM: Building & Zoning Department . SUBJECT: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK File # SA-090-87 The Building & Zoning Department today received a revised site plan for the above referenced project. This plan was provided by the applicant in order to address City concerns with site circulation, allowing some parking to be set aside in reserve, saving more existing mature trees and to provide some active recreation on the site. This project is scheduled to be heard before the Hearing Examiner on February 16, 1988. Therefore, we would appreciate a quick response from your office of any concerns you see with this revision. Thank you. 2-2-88 ATTN: Jerry Lind The Fire Department has no problem with the minor revisions related to the Blackriver Corporate Park project. GGG:mbt 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 ilk At- Tir NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON FEBRUARY 16 , 1988 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASE IV & V Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft.. each and for two one-story buildings havipg 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 600 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. File Nos. ECF-078-87; SA-090-87 ; SM-013-87. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 16, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : FEBRUARY 5 , .1988 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I. JERRY F. LIND , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT FIVE (5) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN FIVE ' . .CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a POSTED ON FEBRUARY 5, 1988 Notary Public, in a d for the St to of Washington residing in (1:-.;Ij)-TO , on the 5-Ct, day of pea 1 q 8 n/_06n-f. tAiya,_�� ( Q SIGNED: #214 O.9 rp• ter? 1J ,j:,. s"-' '.'.- ,,r.. •• ,A`'�;t ., r t :tf;' ..:rr !.. A �Q 9' b SEPTEM� City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a 4 s d A a + 'r ct "" k� h ` k• 7 t F ! ,`� 'Ic � �''�•;' 1•g' Rr+�'t. 't''A" ,,5 1` r :.,t t; r" �. s ii x '"� rI '.,• ;`9••, 'fl.'•' �'':_ u i r t. ,F rl to 1+ '! ,•yy 5 •. , : yv�' { }. '- •#""i , �1lrw k s it t `) ) '"4 3 :, n ,. . .4 is ^ 1, r••ems + "• ^ df t • ,N� «•� s` 4 l r c F ter,' lx+r .',1 '� t .T °+r., .YXw P' ;4. ••.L't 7 t a ^ri .1I F.J h f., in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , .CITY HALL • ON FEBRUAPY-1 f88- . BEGINNING AT 9 ;00A.M. Pv • 6B v. CER ' e t .- I,� FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE '' " '`' } "` �`J " ° PARK) PHASE IV & V SA-090-87 , SM-013-87 ' ECF-078-87 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO THREE-STO] BUILDINGS HAVING 74, 000 SQ.FT. EACH AND FOR TWO ONE-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30 SQ. FT. AND 19 , 600 SQ. FT. AND SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT OT AL] SAID DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200 FEET OF P=1 CHANNEL. ., U 7 V .. 't,x.'T,/,'orz,:,,,,,27 jetp2,704./w....:••.7„,•,:?i,17,7; ,,°-,„- .—--., ' 1 . .,,,,,,-,,,:—..4,:jeM4-4,;',4.;:r4A4,tfTefe:,,.,', i.�° .� I ti II 1 ":..,.....':1., -..7 / • , ....--. ' \ •--- .1,1,,,:"i. ..,- \'. , lai • ,ram �,- • 1-1' 0 S \ I ,,,: ...r. '11i- ,+,f_i l '� 11;IllIt ti Fzi-iii I]'I-�0 aiii,f i1' ';,.;'t:.,,l: io- .I 1! -• I.I' I LOCATED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th. STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVE . S .W. FOR FURTHER ONFORMATION GALL THE CITY OF RENTON • BUILDING & s®NUNG DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS 'NOTICE 'T ;,:., REMOVE:`o.',) WITHOUT : ' r '. 5 ' 1,'h..:.a` 11yi B ' '" _1 wk ' ' - . . . .. .. - g,.;,, ii .„ �> r ^Yy d•ar ;y : �y: ;a .->.,. ,i,;,r;>.,,._ ... , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON FEBRUARY 16, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASE IV & V Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings 'having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 600 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. File Nos. ECF-078-87; SA-090-87; SM-013-87. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 16, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: February 5, 1988 F/2 •, y . CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director • February 3, 1988 Barbara Moss 800 5th Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: First City Equities (Blackriver Corporate Park) - Phase IV & V ECF-078-87 SA-090-87 SM-013-87 Dear Ms. Moss: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department has scheduled a public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner for February 16, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9: 00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any question, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Er ckson, AICP Zoning Administrator cs • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 I ti 4 CITY OF RENTON :kMv:x;.{, x:. 'A ',,,.,.t.�, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 3, 1988 First City Equities 800 5th Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: First City Equities (Blackriver Corporate Park) - Phase IV & V ECF-078-87 SA-090-87 SM-013-87 Dear Sirs: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department has scheduled a public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner for February 16, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9 : 00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any question, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Si erely, 4(1— . ,..i Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 I I � ik e.1 cn"' y OF ►' ENTON "g '" BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 3, 1988 Shelley Anderson 13618 SE 180th Renton, Washington 98058 RE: First City Equities (Blackriver Corporate Park) - Phase IV & V ECF-078-87 SA-090-87 SM-013-87 Dear Ms. Anderson: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department has scheduled a public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner for February 16, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9: 00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any question, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. ely4/1101 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 (lbCITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ammo Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 3, 1988 Roger Kluck 8916 20th Avenue N.E. Seattle, Washington. 98115 RE: First City Equities (Blackriver Corporate Park) - Phase IV & V ECF-078-87 SA-090-77 SM-013-87 Dear Mr. Kluck: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department has scheduled a public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner for February 16, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9: 00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representatives) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to ou before the hearing. If you have any question, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. ly, /. /(/. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540' e c >a 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE' . ( 47 1q }§^�, \tJf 5 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -Fe , 17 DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22. 1987 • COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 9riii. ' EFC - 078 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : • SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELIN MANAGE IENT:.,_W=013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: BLACKRIVER' CORPORATE PARK PHASES IV & V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE: PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND 'FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING' 30,750 SQUARE FEET AND 19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL'SHORELLNES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET .OF. P-1 CHANNEL. LOCZTED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th 'STREET AND EAST,•OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES • BUILDING AREA (gross): 197,750. SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: F is (.n E 0 E 1-1 EILM.D,; e /ZOM.O DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTC BUILDING .& ZONING DEPAE--RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NOS) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MGMT: SM-Q13-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRIVER 'CORPORATE PARK - 'PHASES Iv & v BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SIT PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO .3-STORY BUILINGS HAVING 74,000 SQ. FT. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SO. FT. AND t9,CIQO SD.. FT. AND 'SUBSTANTIAL SHORET',INF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 'FEET'OF P-1 CHANNEL. LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF S_W_ 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDAT.F. 7 VENTTF. S W' TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11/18/87 El ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 171 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' E] POLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO ,THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON NOVEMBER 5. 1.87 REVIEWING DEPARTMpT/DIVISION : firms �-e\rL c 5-r • APPROVED to APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 0-et 61,.. -e-f:t --ey - �� . .� -z: AO cue.7„,‘„,„.7.4.4,, /-c° -A-JGeGdevW J.cle_e.e) n•co-IL +6.0-fd g-e* C 11-e4ge-a- DATE: (Alt /717 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENvanONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE /r///7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Uffi Ml DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5. 1987•• EFC - 078 - 87 ' APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM=013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES . PROJECT TITLE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK PHASES IV & V . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION, FOR SITE: PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SQUARE FEET AND .19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID', DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET .OF. P-1 CHANNEL. LOCZTED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES • BUILDING AREA (gross): 197,750 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation / 15) Public Services i`// 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • t'1`; t. `1 � I, t i t �. �, D ,F ,:,1.,/ ��'� f�!'.SGIZ0�It�G �` irlii.- We have r-vi-wed this application with particular attention to those areas we have exp•rti-e ', and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio al ik on is needed to properly assess this proposal. Iiir Signat.re of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT , DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • ECF - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MGMT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRIVER 'CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILINGS 'HA'VING 74,000 'SQ. FT. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30.750 SO. FT. AND �9,000 S�_ "FT. AND STTBSTANTIAT, SHORFT,T,� . 1lEVET,OPMRNT PR MTT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 'FEET'OF P-1 CHANNEL. LOCATION : LOCATED SQUTH OF S_W, 7th" STREET AND EAST OF OAKESOAT,E AV_FNTTE S_W_ TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC "DATE : 11/18/87 LI ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : S--UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION . [I] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU f LI PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT R e•-;: 1 .••Y -•;4. ' . --' u - i �•I El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT L:."., !`; , 'a ' ' '4'k 't'` OTHERS : „'..'�:;;CIZ�JR:�;LO Dc�'�• COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 5, 1987 . - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Or/Lay • 1V6-1 IE ,/et/G0 0 APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED itia(J5 A0040)w9 watery L4L1O -( [UTILITY APPROVAL SITED S7 i; _ __ ern. (/PGO It uS te) a.btu - .".. L J LATE COMERS AGREEF•s�'fi�:yyAii _ Q LATE COMERS AGREE; .SO _ 1,4E5 S'-_3Z 3 P,I/7: TU hid A'(A/. rr -) /g, ',S7 �.3 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT G:L:, WATT ,__ ,. .y.55',.to. D¢ SQ.F?. X,S176/ I7g _ sOf a3/ el°• 88 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT G: T _ ,� ?'O• SPECIAL ASSESSMENT A+L'. !. -ydp SPECIAL ASSESSMENT f fir: c:..._..'- J APPROVED WATER PLAN L y 'i APPROVICD SEWER PUN � v r APPROVED FIRE HYDRAN e.ti�dai,;;::3 ` rB ;IS. pbrPT.G&r~Fd.E�'d C:+l'E . 4- f, .,' * 1st eel CO/th zL 0 - _ -" DATE, / 7 Z7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • Form 182 • - ..,72,..,/e_.,-x:'f..e/2-•e-g,--,-27 6F... •-•";4/ • REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS j ' 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME Q� ,�;2. s 0,-4_ --)._ , --5-- ) �7- _,„ -: U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS - -d/frs0,9d FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): (z /! /der?) I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD FRAME (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW)D 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA; FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 76/,pr0-42 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 61, USING AREA (A): Sap® 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: _ 4�6sD GGPM ( IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD4, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B)PM (C) ) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 7,5"� GPM (p) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -- /.8 7,S CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY M CE) AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT': USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MA . ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE URE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH /6 O ADD --( ; --% 11 - 30 20% MAX. 31 - 60 � 15% MAX. EAST 777 ADD /6 % 61 -100 SOUTH io, ADD10% MAX. WEST is ADD /O 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : gO % CTOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: 9. DETERMINE ROOF ANDSIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT; �SU GPM (F) CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM (G) CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,03� GPM) (2.-&ro?5 (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: sC] GPM (H) / dam///`,/ r/' f 11. SIGNED: '�lr�."("��� r9C-,4 [�aTEZ ?, if 9'�� . 0 • REQUIRED FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME dCC c-j4 I e 7..A-0, l' .1/2.C.v4" �ii ,� U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS .s. /,2/. 7 �' 7j c _/)//r0s,e? 6 FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): (sib 'C' 2 I - II IV IIIFIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY V � WOOD FRAME MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA; FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 3P/50 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 81, USING AREA (A): 3 71�() GPM (B) 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: -- IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD ADD /z� GPM (C) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): o UP TO 25% OF (B) CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) al 44”..'s" GPM (D) 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF J 7 �� GPMY (E) AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UPHAZARD OCCUPANCY TO75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT•; USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 11 - 30- 10 25% MAX. NORTH /SD ADD a- % 31 - 60 20% MAX. EAST 9a ADD /o % • 31 -100 15% MAX. SOUTH ' ;cam ADD zG % 10% MAX. I WEST 7o ADD /6 % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : /(0 % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADS STMENT: 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: GPM (F) (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM (G) (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) /73, 75' CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: T o��SC/ GPM (H) Li. SIGNED: c - d9� 0 rATE ,a:1. /,6-7 1 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ` REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PQ,k k ` DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: ' 0NO�VEMB0ER.5 `1987h EFC - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT: . FIRST CITY EQUITIES , . PROJECT TITLE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SQUARE FEET AND .19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELLNES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET .OF. P-1 CHANNEL. LOCZTED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES • BUILDING AREA (gross): 1'97,750SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 0 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: This projectas proposed will have major recreation, non-motorized circulation, and aesthetic impacts. The plan provides for no significant useable passive recreation open space. The need for this is underscored by the fact that on a nice summer day one can observe workers throwing frisbies in the congested parking lots of First Cities' Phase 1, 2, and 3 projects. If it was designed properly, one open space could not only service the passive recreation needs of all three buildings, but it could also function as a unifying element for the entire site. The open space unifying buildings C & D is a beginning, but it should be expanded. Further, because of this site's close proximity to the proposed,Springbrook and Black River Trail systems, shower facilites should be included to accommodate those people who will make active use of those trails during their lunch hours. There is no significant pedestrian circulation system proposed. This is especially a problem between the buildings on the site. The proposed design allows parking and the misuse of landscaping to segregate and disjoint the site. No provisions have been made for bicycle parking even though sixteen bicycles can be accommodated by the average parking space required by a standard American automobile. (continued see attached ) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 a -2- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET COMMENTS:. The landscaping misses its potential to help create a pedestrian and auto focal point for the site and instead serves more to break the site up, hide it or act as a barrier. The effect of this is not to be under estimated when the signifi- cance of Oakesdale Avenue as a major Renton new arterial is considered. The connecting road between this phase and the existing phases needs to include pedestrian facilities and be given a landscape treatment that helps unify the two sites. To experience all the shortcomings of the proposed plan all one has to do it drive or walk through Phases I, II, III, and IV. RENTON BUILDING •& ZONING DEP ;TINENT . DEVELOPMENT • APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET• • ry,, ECF - 078 - 87 I �, , y 9{ t. ;; APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL:. SA-090-87 SHORELINE MGMT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - 'PHASES IV & V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT;' APPLICATION'FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILINGS 'HAVING '74,000 'SQ. FT. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30.750 SO. FT. AND "I'9..000' SO_ 'FT: AND SUBSTANTTAT, SHORFT,TNF, DRVETd)PMFNT PFRMTT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET'OF P-1 CHANNEL. LOCATION : LOCATED SOiiTH n S_W_ 7th' GTRF.FT ANT) F.A GT r)1 o ..RTIAT.i ASIF.ATiiF. G lkT'_ TO: fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULED• ERC DATE ; 11/18/87 ENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : fl UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU EPARKS RECREATION DEPARTMENT EIBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICEDEPARTMENT [' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : • • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON . NOVEMBER 5. 1987 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION , lv` �G� � ,ge?&G`'te,‘ 1=1 APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED As presented at this junc , the environmental issues outlined go beyond a conditional , ' approval. If the project proponents could improve their project concept so that the ' conditions do not require redesign, but rather modification of a basically acceptable concept, then conditions could be reasonably suggested. • c DATE: ///r/ V SIGNATUR F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE • " REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENv2kONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Tra-Fc DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5. 1987•• EFC - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). :_SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM=013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES , . PROJECT TITLE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK PHASES IV & V, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY . BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SQUARE FEET AND 19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELLNES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID IIDEVELOPMENTWITH 200 FEET. OF. P-1 CHANNEL. 4,1t LOCZTED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST �OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 197,750. SQ. FT. i IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth I/ 2) Air C/ 3) Water 4) Plants t.---- 5) Animals /..--s 6) Energy and Natural Resources (----- 7) Environmental Health lo'` 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing �- r, 10) Aesthetics ,e..--'— 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation e,--"" 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ls- 14) Transportation V' 15) Public Services 16) Utilities 1.----" COMMENTS: COP! OF RE TON REcvED OCT 2 91987 -__ S _ _' z1� e. f i- . BUILD NG I ZONING DE '� > �- / A.k --____--' 01 itcyallaia . ow/tit AV OedtplAtiu#4' 16 "4"6(14.gfi. 9 , _ ; C643“ Cifieri• ÷ArtrIL / - .,,,,„/ • Vet C. dc4;&J At.1 4 com 1 4"VM ,_.... We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1-- -/ a )j /2 �7 Signature of Director or Aut orized Representative Date 4 Y; , Form 4 • B L lac I L R we- EZ Co 12` o OJL rr' Ph -a:se_ Lit V Gc} . P--)) c.997 L $ Few., ,f Tv ag;. It srta,( 0b S t�;,(_, c: � � ' 5w 7 t? f e ' - , e ke SA.) f� I 1 y _ �y ! / �� � � c3J ��toLy- 3� G9 1s l X �(O�I6 LZ62 ' is % X 4/01.4 = 1, 3 349 To TA- Alvlbc.Thir 4 3, 664 a �va�f- ic G1tt:ci -a.410 .1--7 Cms - 4v va,t,,spe„ 1.1 [ pvt v e e i ►-c - s f ILO (ate-,a51 j�Ae.L .ter ci A . 7V..." 4�. ? , arty OF ENTON 7 y onv RECEOVED algal C 3o Zsa ,. T D 1 I ' vDc, ti "A iff, 0NR,417 flrrr -TOT OTA -- I 410 , 7 -So 6s - ?a,. 5 lc�va q gT, lIf 4374, Colet,z, ,/ p x _ go6j, �98 T GL.15 + 61 .. . , 1/ 411144#44Atettlf E4 1 HIV IM; off' e f�e� p-ar.55,1 St/.. . 7Z->/ ,�LT.S a +7$S S��/ _ 71,� ,2 f( Q 1, -4-,t-o 4-,p7 / l/ ' RENTS ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA'WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87', SHORELINE MGMT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRTVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ' APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILINGS HAVING 74,000"SQ. FT.. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING •30,750 SQ. FT., AND 19.000 SQ_ FT: AND SUBSTANTIAL SHORELIU DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET OF P--1 CHANNEL. LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF S_WW 7t-h STREET ANfl FAST nF CTAKFSflAT•F.' AVRNTTR R W TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11/18/87 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING ,DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 5, 1987 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ' Z.dl')IrUCA . APPROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ID NOT APPROVED E� ' O t.cl yv\�r\Y-( e 3AIJ1 CEO YrN►'h em-1 AppL-re DATE, SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' REVISION 5/1982 • Form 182 7 RENTQ-' BUILDING & ZONING DEPAPT9ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • ECF - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MGMT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:" APPLICAT ON'FOR STTI! PLAN APPR VAT• To ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILINGS 'HAVING 74,000 'SQ. FT. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,7.50 SO. FT. AND I9.00.0 SD. FT. _AND SUBSTANTIAL SHORELIIV DFVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET OF P-1 CHANNEL. LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH: OF 7t-h' STREET _4ND EAST OF OAKESDAT.F. AVENTTF S w TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED . ERC DATE : 11/18/87 Ei ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT MBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT [' OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO 'THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON NOVEMBER 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : LI�C� APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED LG /�GcJ icJ e • DATE: 2 �/ SIGNATURE OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZ D REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1882 Form 182 ' RENTnM BUILDING :& ZONING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-080-87, SHORELINE MGMT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:" APPT,I -A'T'ION'FOR SITE P .AN AP ROVA . TO ATT,OW mH STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILINGS 'HAVING •74,000 'SQ. FT. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30.7.50 SO- FT..' AND 'L9 0_0O SQ_ 'FT. _AND SUBSTANTIAL SHORELTig DFVF.T.OPMENT PFRMTT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET OF P-1 CHANNEL. LOCATION : Lo ATED SOUTH' OF S_W_ 7tii" STRF.F.T ANTI F.AGT' (IF (IAKFSTIAT.F. AS1F.NiiF. S_W'_ TO: Ej PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED . ERC DATE : 11/18/87 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : FJUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT E .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT ELPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 21 -.eA1,01U 17604-tervAtit APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Li NOT APPROVED I7 -1114dtilt1.44. • t,,At A AL .A ACC..' DATE: )A� 2 IGNATUR' OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA—AGENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87 SHORELINE MGMT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & v BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPT.TGATLQIIT'FOR SITE PAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILINGS HAVING 74,000 'SQ. FT. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,7.50 SO. FT. AND 'T9.0110 SD FT, AND SUBSTANTTAL SHORETW, DRVFT,OPMENT PFRMTT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET OF P-1 CHANNEL. LOCATION :. LOCATED SOUTH OF S_W_ 7th' STPFF.T ANTI FAST ( C)AKF.ST)AT,F. AVF. TTTF. _W'_ TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11/18/87 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : EIUTILITIES ENG, DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT E .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT r POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 5, 1987 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED ,APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS � NOT APPROVED r4 ;*.14 ‘‘)2-,% ff �G/�il/IdTHORIZED 1R�b � DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA a—MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MGMT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK —PHASES IV & V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILINGS HAVING '74,000 'SQ. FT. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,7.50 SQ. FT. AND Ta.= SO- FT, AND SUBSTANTIAL SHORELT= DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET OF P-1 CHANNEL. LOCATION : LOCATED SOUTH OF S_w_ 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKF.SDAT,F. AVF.NUTF. S W TO: 1::] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11/18/87 NJ ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P ,M, ON NOVEMBER 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ;_ ® APPROVED E APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED /41 ° . P OF RE NTDN ¶ltEGEv OCT 291B7 BUILDING I ZONING vc.PT• DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENTr' BUILDING & ZONING DEPAcerMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MGMT: SM-013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & 'V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; APpT,T _ TTON"EOR SIT . p .AN APPROVAL To AT,T,Ow m ON- STRUCTION- OF TWO 3-STORY BUILINGS HAVING 74,000 SQ. FT. EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SQ. FT. AND I .QOQ EQ.. FT. AND SUBSTANTTAT, SHORET,iN1 DEVELOPMENT PFRMTT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET OF P-1 CHANNEL. LOCATION ; LOCATED SOUTH OF S J61 7t-11' STREET AND EAST OF OAK1 ST)AT.R AVENTIE S W TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11/18/87 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ,TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5;00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 5, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; !w 4F/Lc / '/6LNEER TA/G' APPROVED . APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED A. f"3c, CITY OF RENTON OCT 291997 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. (k-Le / DATE: /6 7/ 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR ZiZRIZED EPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 r//• B LAc I( R CoizPo k/V P • Lit V Oct . :-)) L.9i97 /o La-L.ce. S Fe.C TV ag,;- r i.►s-taitJk: S 5w tfr e .51J 3, 62 'K lS l X 4094 szz62 ,s' t) ?--adr 1J4:1 Atie 31-0 l e TA L AWo 464 ate _ pt ' o y a Pf- 1 ZL'efj-C �-, �m S .�- v T tea LI s g 4t a`41 TL--t S/5“.) CD-,--r L d Q y, c ?y oav " •• D 15 boa -TeTA-L.- I ) So 54-9÷, iwt cs C.!_44,7c- �'rA C,S3sc s, 1 go 4, O 9a ° l 1 1 (S Vi cep , o. f r 'a cct / • - • " SY44 S Lfri -a -7--a_ci Zejct_ . , e ASsr•S's' 4./ 1.1-7?) g_sl 3.44_4-44 p-424-7-4.1 ,5 - .1 ® W w 7C D I o 3Y7 mr W W I c7 * aR (A0 DZT DOD ° T c m lo` O m . ' 4Q'`% D O 90 J r S dS CO i 4 `0' C o ty. eo • Nk I4 of. A` t a oy' o ells AP.IN eti tat 8S - As 4t \ . )IN t 7.1 Aw.S`N` • 77 13 m 0 71 O Ns,. mnt m illaOakadale Rd N i —IN N MS •AV sl'P'�l'0 co cowi b iz aQ o Powell s. S '0 0 z SI: ll ;... () y T T. e. SW. __.1 --I a 7 co a Seneca < o C Ave. SW *� • --I 1',\f 0.1 Llnd kr C. 0 Z � o�n ps Rd. 1 t. �d� :: h. st Road II:alnlrAve. N. "FP kNse1s� 111 w 0t bs - n P w • — Can CA • i 0 0 • i. _ . e ,1 G. h .. _ .. . _, .... _. .. . . „..,,... ,....... ._ _ , . -": ::::,?.''.,-':;"'=":7-i. --.'.;•.,:t*.-5:-.4.-,•,. --,ft•-:•-:,,,-", • -: .. . 4,•:',F.r.f.:'-e.. i=S:(7'."--','..'. ."-'"-f'ji;-"...z7,7'... • • . - • . . - . • • - • C • - i.. 7 , • . ' 11.1.11111111111.11111.1.1.E 1 . . ---• - . i . " -' - •-l..':;-"t':':"'Y- -..."V..,,.,;t.i'•---'.-:-.;',2i._.,,,_.• , . • • . • • 1 -'-''''''''--•-,-..:'.'•'•.1,'-'...-zt•'.i•fir?;.-:::`-'?r4'-‘''', -.:1-- . S - • g • 11 VICINITY . • . • . . ,,• m ;,: ,.. • )4'''. • • . .. \ • , .. • . • • , . EPPOWELL `.AVENUE S.W. 0,„.....;....3.. .... • •. :. • _ • -ro,.-..----. • g • . -•••-1-•:-.-.. ..:.•.:?..-- -'41.-"-":2?..4----• - -• an .-••••A7-1::-11:11 "\\\tA . . . -- i -- 777-7t,r/77-7-. - ___.\ ( - Ab'v ..: •-•,..1014.0.,...,:aka:t • l'4024-- - - ar* - • - "inworn•(a j . ,r;--,,-------4,-:, . ..„....1._!„::: ..• .. .,......iiii.,trtsti,...8,1, /t ..mo. ..,-..la •••••• .- _,- _.. ..,-..-- ---- \ • • 1111.' _ 9._ ! 4fIro• % • . . t Or -,,gb. •-•--..,..t.:-,--,4,:, .01 "/"------- 3 .1* g: 47- --., 1 - - - At . t ,elk El - gl \_ \ 46: . . • -'. •dr = :t.-.‘ . 1. a: v .!:-., L. / :47- , ,..,‘,-...0- l'; - 1. . \'V.,. 'IiitriLl"Wiliiimr-Ar ...), -..\' I: . , Za;••••• 7• . . . g • • .... .... II" ! 1 • :Jr - •• • t -4„ Li a .,..., .... •m . . .. .P. - _ •0 .0 .. ..• - ge...A. I, __:,.121 rd. I \... • . - L gillo In ' - 31 21 % .VS OA rr• .4P'' i!, 'C‘ ___ - -- h. -•t• 1 • " -:"1,-,-,-•:_:'-izV,•.6,'.;15-',4.;,•-q: ----,:---"",:"."-. vi, r i --- )i *s. • . • I El : . ,._... ,_-..,- . _ . .1'• 1 '. i .:-;:•,S74:-S,:at5-,•.q4-':. - .i'm ,, CI " il ' 14 - tal/gr..-'f %MI '..6• \.. . . 7 . . • •1 i -:- -.-.. -•.'1.,,I-Vi-;-.:;:•:.4,'oL,,,,,t--,-•,•, - . 1, al,, a.. .0. _,..k. . i . 9-- --- -- ' . • - -,•:-.:a•--,.;--,-.4.,:rv.-,r,,;,:_;3--,,,,.--i,•.',:-' -. , '" :tar Illgr N • - ' .. \‘• * V° 'a.. _ •-- - 4/. I A ' .. I% • ' . '""•:‘':'''''''''''' '""'.(:;*'-'''''',-,7,-;"-C:':.-..,:'-:-.---•--,'-....• -• ..., 11.0g 'C ..1 1- 1 iv f 1 ikibt 40'. %. \ o7.111- - - -S.--'--, : - ' AZT' 'Pik -;,••"14.r _ 4._. .• ' ../ % .-_,,- .._ • 0,... ,D,..as was/am-._01Pario.flia=,....10.11:rillar I - ' - 111? .144t Cer OIL, '--' r• :. ''.•-001 a- v-- 1.0 4b ** • 1 \. 4 s' • - ...sr - -. iA't l''' -) •A • . . - --;=.---'7'.";:, ''':'.-i'----fi-,',e •-•.:.:': r........,6::', ,N;0:4.ii;PMagigaM.M0.0gAMNA.:: ...i kef,e ••••••A tr.rita•-% ail qk 111414 -4..,26414,••.tir., \\ _ . ••T . • '. _ .t.,' ••• -•-.4. 4 •Ik.i...1. 114.. w".•i.. •f-: '77,-':::,:i.:i-,-'4';- !;:•"k.:::i::4,ftx: Vi:,i,'ARl.Wi .'N;inON..w.%-vmwm;ii,.. ,.........,,......,..........r..,. ._.„... ..,..,..... ., , .. . • . TV -o- - ., • ''''''"''''''' '''''''-a--:i' ,1:, ,%,':i..:•;' aRkatiVaineVitigAtRagnElfin :.A.. ..77.,.4.*:4:•;,..ii .::. ,•:.A•4*.: .,...,,-• ,, • ....k ..•- 5 Mk wr . .. . .-........,:.,.._;;...-____-- - . k.mmoltoi.2.,g.tiv..glAV. :TAWqqPz..t:A?:,,IfFmr:14,:::-grnwimarswivieo,i*i Naches AvesS.- .A. _ -.. 4. ....:...,ar-mom„,...gmiamma,mo.v„:3,,,,a ,....• vir,, _.,;.„ . 1. .. s -- '4 • • 1 • • • •', . -- • "--- --•••••--''' 4ri. . .f.•::IV.''.':..•.::':•?.-:..... •:::..;;;;;::.1-.::•40:.;.;..:.;;;4 ;.;.: w.A.„:„Avp: .,::. ... a a• mr- . -.-- --_,-., --- :,,:•-• In I. - . n , ' -.--2•. ';015;:ir'il- :• itialefigeneeMigs:Mag,WW.fl.:Wian:.M;,!.:1•.:.:-Ii• wi.i.i.„.,-, w,,„,,,. e . .i.:' ,-i--„,.,-:!„--.,',-.,-,','--.,-,-,-;...:H-..- • PHASE1!.......-:;..7.‘f.....::......'...:.5....!..r. t .. . ,,,w,„,:,,,,„:„„,,,,„„,„:,„,,..„:,,,„,,,„,,,„.„:„:,„„,,„:,,,„,...,„;,,,,,. ' 1 -----"'"'''''"'''"""'"" ' 'Ar"''''' ":'''" .,..,. .;(.• . . _ ...... ••••••,.........,. ... ,..... . - . - ,.. -..7;•-,.:7.--- • - ..vge,,a,,,,,clo .,•,,,•....,,,...eqi::::•:„„.,„,:.•:::..:::,..,-„. •,.....:,:••,:••,..PHASE.„,., „.„.„..:::,....„........,:i,,j - • ifi, i.liin • . .•...,•.;•„... .,..,.. .....,,, ,,..,.,.„.- :,•,-,••••. ...---- • •„$, 4; ,,, ,_-, ----..-".."----------------"•-•-•"• -• -.----- -----------• •••••• • • •••••• --- -----. - .......... ,... .:41,%Oil. .:(.-:"."- ; __ . f.i. idr, In • _ I • -,-. ''':','",; ' •••.. _..Mi,KMI:i•n::;i.:::.:::::::::::::::::::::;:::::: :: :•ii,'W:Mii:ii.WE:i.:::'i,'-,,,,w:.*: ',ii.::::Wi:Vi,w.::.:.•:mia:i•i::::::iFi5.,.. inn:i .s..,•:::,:„.:•.?i;.:: :::.,.%.. .A, .7.,,-,..,f;..;„,-„,,.I.•,,,f, ."'I•''''";:''':•:• .r:•,V=•:•::.::;::%•:i:•.:.'gi:A•:.: ::.:::.::A: 2.a. .•::-,..i.'i .Zi.':. Ea4=44•,.::..;:::.,..:1',e-:.,,.-V:'..:6:::.,:W.I.A:,i•W•n:f.: c_._ Z\ •. • ':iti.•-i . C4 I. . •• -: 4-- '-- -.,i•Viga4WFMMOMMAWEVg.. ..i.ori.wini;:e.,*.i;:.,?.?:::i*W.*i.OM.;i_41i0ftwnwir,,,,,,,,.„.,i,,,,,„:::::,....:.:,,,,,:„,,,,,....,;,.,,..:,,... .„ ' t:4:...-v..: laii,,, ia.:,,,,,,04dplaln : :.1 .......•. •- I.-- --.....--,-----410141.1111- AVENUE"---. '-'--7-ten co, ,• . . .co a:12 . V t 210telk,. ,,..._ .V:i.FI:i:.*:,:.2i:i:;X:i.::::.-.W.,:.• .:.:.,:g........,..0.:::::js.:P ",..."..v?;1: ::.::::: :;::::::::.:::::ir. tiM,:ii,i,,,A1*.$4,?.‘.Q.. i.`,.:,.:4', 4,..,.,MX.ntf.,Vi.,:i.ir::•,i'::.::::::::in.14,. .:i.'i,i:iii.SW.,1,:.,inlaki,:.:.''',...: i*,i'Mi.,;:c::*::: fq• s 1 Ilik •lig.f.• ..STI• .....;',1:2ini:i.V6M'F;':;:::.',,,-:.'',...1.i.i. I,7,1:WiWPOMMika?.r.::,_._:?..W.%!WW:gaiNAWM.WW:*i.:..WWa..:Mii:.,'MO.V.M.: ::::VW : a.-• .:...:..g....:,.:.:§:.„4 ,:.?:.,:4#:.......,, COAV`.&.... PNI. - - .. •. • UMF.iik,WM-tiittetTVlobli.%4C40.retbiiie.W:i.VMNIN iitligAMAN.V4:0. .440A-WA::. .: . .,0,1 - alf..w.sAr 10.i.Aggigag:,:i*Asir.:....: eggir,Q145144ge:Fg.'...*.MM.:Waan •0•::spt.t0.W.:4.6,an.00.fte10-,.:::-.::- •-.'•:e.“ C. 1•11: ,-,-.4.......... -....,• • -1 ;.--„S''ty:-N','=.<,.„,-".,,mM4.,,,-°- --i,ii,,,,,tMogplo6fw•NM-wrCV inieikwVngwg::::ii,kg4*gg.f.-a......r.::a::-M.,!.,,,wgigi;gmgi:,.e,--,.,,k,,,,,wgon:i.-tgegggnngf ::''',.'.;i•O. .:,:g.:,.A.,,,..?:,,,;,43„...a,..e•rwt„ - f:' 4-04..o...-.. ..ei.us.v'-.7:1..,v„.,-•--,-...,....•....c7. ...-.* • •-• -tz--7.44s . .' ,,,..,„ . •v.:. .cei •-:..0•••tAl•nrlhAVAMOWN•S$04-:.400f.§0&:Or'-'=::t7.f:!:-';':-::'..!-'..-:.-:.:...*::::!:''"..!:`'ffn"!f'..::::f•'.:A'1•,.."''"--.,::1"' g--,•;'-i---r-''4•41 '--‘: ` - . ,.mom !iiiir-..„1" ..-_- --•- .- .. . ...,,,,-,.,-.5,--.,-.: - .1s W.>i4.. I.re ,,,,'''z',.:v"..•:js':.,:.,1,k.4w16.,:eiiAiat-fto::.'N„a„.:rn,„::,,il„,f„a:„., .:.&,-. l .7 .• *1--:-.4:f. V rrimwow,om4*,w-•,:.„:w„..,--.'4..::„-i§:.•-.:--•.....„.-:,.:,.,,,e0„:„,.....gib ••••-... _ , lejOISM4- f,... . - * . •.- - - _,„.. . Aiti1:01110F:%*'..r.•-----. .0.--.. R- % ,..,:-:•i•ie:OMMN:g.8041,M8...q.j:i-ed*M.RatgM.:MPF'_?,''' 'Airr,f.t,..14 .00••,.•A0- :-.4:le-. x ...!.em- _--z.....1. .•. --00 II - • *. -, • .*:.0 , • TO e- • A'•;,:-:.-' .-;',•'::0a040.katfalaiM4A•-i'.°•.'..rat4.0,04-4,:•iirk4, 0"1,47..,,g1.'W6,ii4Og4,10. -Vii. -- ,yie .. . , .. - • ••" • , • ...- _X... "•*`• •so ' art__ -.1);p .---1.'s;14,11agraill•-;a4gittr.• !:.., ?ilgoigii;•;.- 'Jr egz..- .._.-----------: -011--,0.46.)... 54,1T.,..4,..r.-.. • 0,, . ...a• • .00.0,--,. . -41.,zi•-,%.- -...:4:-.1• . , .-,v -:. Ap...;,:,...0:-,:,)1,-..,, ,.340".,,,,,:,,,,,,.:-La.-:.i::::, ...,.. .-..)106- -••;• . ' . ilitilio•-111.--int', '79-- . .1.0•,,,,,,,00.-- --_,--.' -,,e__„„kr••-tah.lc.:14.... ft . ....„,.i.tr•_.4......... -..- ,.. :- ,• . . ,-,,,,--?...,,,,,:.4-_,44,-;---.; -., - - • • ... . ,,....•, ...... ... = .. . -429,.. - --:•-':_-.^,` ••• • '44::::1:::,i;i•%'!$''''i'%,;.1'.. --4,17i1.0.t.77:44,0* .•ilk. CD " S 0.16 ' liw--.4 r01104. .r..,ii".00 . • .... . ---,---.. aggirr,IP - --- . . . . •-.;,-i.,..:t.--, .. ----. • . . ..-;-._ -:. - ..• ,.. . • -,,,,, ...•;74,44. , . .. . 4.,-,"__..,,• . _•,..._. ...., _ ....,-,,,•,,,-„,_--,.-. :,., - e.6 --._ •.;'Sr.f er r'r, --'-.:4''°,i-II 4.- ' . ..,..... rr.nfitiapia :.; liVit..• ilia -i ire . 41(...•• - „...- .40,.. . . -," . - _ ,. Or 0-,_,.,.,-.„,,,_ -....,,.... : - C- - - reit4i - -• • - - ... „._. _, _.. ,. ,-01-0,0•!.-::lx-1411J-71.1m. "-1::101i..‘.6 . • . ..-::... l -,-.-. .1., .-;:-:':-;-.,;::,Lf.it-,,--2.i.-.,.r.E.!:-.:',-,.,.:,,,..IN\---:......-_,,,.:-;-.. -•,-;---i,7.'.4::.*- ..... ..._.41-3v.er,,,c, :.- _. . -- •am . ...41,0,1, • 41-441.0b-k-- . .:, ,._,„:-,- .,.....4.i,-,...,..:,_..,,..,:,„.-..,_;:--:,,.„.. A 4. 0 ii# -. •'''......--„,4 ;7.."PALO, ;..::31 Ow..-•1 t,.., . 1_0111 • :7-.•;•:: ..-- . . . --ori- .• .-r-- 3.-. ,- -,.';.- , :'.:- Th. : .'.---. , .,,::':,1_,„ ..::: ::-.,2;;Y,_;.7.• ::-.',, '. -' , 1-:: x....,;151,ii:"-t...;4K:'Z : , ,:,..:-,,,,',:::,:::,,-,..q...,,:ra.:;!,.:-L.'!...:::_-;;:-.7-;`,...:-.".:7,.. ' •Ns.,.%, .:...,._. lits,.....".A.,jrib713.4r.: rt_•••1 s' • . . p, ... -1-y„,„-:,•:',-,: -.••-•.,t-,-,-,----••••••••-•:•,--f:-•••".?•:•,_.-:-:--;"- ---r.' ‘•:.- ... .7 Ex isiti ._. , _.„ ,, . .. ,... _ • ,.. ., . .. ....„ .,,_ ..., ,.. .. • . . . .......„.....• _ .. . ...- 0- ..r._ 010. . - '= 110'...•• . ,... ___ • ,...-- .--• ../Bsi,_ _,....,e;•,. •• . . . . ' - . ,.,• - ,''' t si.• '. .-40,-. ' ...•• . , ..ft•e'ditrir-.000k11 "- - -*. 'i -- ' '- , Ilf.2 °1„ere., ,, . ...WA . • ' : .. _,....„ " .. .„.._,,,..„ ,,,,,,,,:„.• • . .. . . .. 4 o'; 6 44•10. ..,z-esoilL.--fr -' . :_..-;.4-:--- - . -- • ! - 1 74 11 01 s r• ,01 0• B Undin a „.,... ..,,,„ -- -1:2:',:,:-7-:•:7•:•-r, -4P,,,ttak,:, - . `2Dornt -016 • NZA t 31NLL5 1 i'U Tl silt pl,iNO Precool- sUPp.i6I001' Fo R- .l.5`11N(o 1 V TC7i\i\ io-rN 1 1/0 AK Nv1 iZ01.)1 no\i-re VI-lICUL.fi,(` G1 IZC Ul.l 101) ! 10 Lour c Pi Kft3(o ) hRt4( Ps bultblru&s. SSHou1_,10 -87- . 1 2149N Eft,IAONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE , q i' F" REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 2 cArml • DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22. 1987 • COMMENTS DUE: NOV'EMBER =5,.-`'11987 f EFC - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-0 0-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM=013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES S PROJECT TITLE: ,BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK PHASES IV & V . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE: PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750. SQUARE FEET AND 19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET .OF. P-1 CHANNEL. LOCZTED SOUTH. OF S.W. 7th STREET AND .EAST .OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES • : BUILDING AREA (gross): 197,750 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants �L 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation (� 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: >�a.ocAcir bolLofavc loo "z)'` -- 3 D 1N DR DC SPvg Rct,J DECIDUOUS -rK86s, I.00,pv-re OR.1 UeuLA{ or\r'O Odd FO AtLJC, F IZON-1 o PoUILDING Yid `'6" Ciloc, -o c1-465 -roc) G(,C1S(,&f 1 Ik.)Q0 n CIO ON) Slrf (-- TZ.lpiiU OR.IE(U-tdO i R.�,�c 3 uuD 1'56 CNGO�‘z--FSGc(.D TO wc.i..L)ot- PICA)1() 1Ikr1,65 4 eITlrv(o U ram 1,11<cL((sc, C,ar(o w ca.o TIC.(24 -3o") *►Q Tub YYN I►ODUG or rile 51fC 1 PRopo� To ad, '1 .8ry.o j SO Dcw6u0NR , 161L 'TI4, FINaI� 6F 1 .5 , cAp 601fwiIvoTolo ?Kg., RE-( 'ilon) S rnkN'U eNl3`1-m)(0 � Arm [3550._ SHOULD I•c OOr o 111M We have reviewed this application with particular atten' ion to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . Form y:, ^ n ra \ i- lfl2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET I '7 f1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,ta i\cL {n�-i L":_ '''n'5' ri. . p , DATE CIRCULATED: OCT BER 22.. 1§87 • COMMENTS DUE: NOVFMBER 5, 1987 • EFC - 078 _ 87 . . APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-0D0-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM=013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES •. • PROJECT TITLE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE: PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND 'FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750. SQUARE FEET AND .19,000 SQUARE FEET, .AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET .OF. P-1 CHANNEL. LOCZTED SOU.TH. OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST .OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES ' ' BUILDING AREA (gross): 197,750: SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT . IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth „/ . 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants ` 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 1 10) Aesthetics . 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ' • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have experti a in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addition i formation is needed to properly assess this proposal. (..--;‹,..„2-r4*. c ,_4L_____ 9 Sigma .u're of Direct r or Authorized Representative Date /Form 4 7 �p( 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET } 7 L- ��oQ,S I !►'G E „ •TMENT: rc�1hc �23di -\R - �. ` 3 `r G Dikirr TED: OCTOBER 22. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1987• It‘)- CtFC 401a - 87 • fa to npr/7nNING DEPT. Ot,, Q ICATION NO(S). : _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM=013-87 -ROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V . BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE: PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND" FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750. SQUARE FEET AND .19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELLNES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET .OF. P-1 CHANNEL. LOCZTED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES • : BUILDING AREA (gross): 197,750 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ✓ . I 2) Air ✓ 3) Water ✓ 4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals ✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources '/ 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics ✓ 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 1/ y 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation ✓ �.J 15) Public Services we 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1) t/k c &k.WiCAA•got s -a k k&'f— GLOLAA-AX.ntt jt,“ 61-47t X m po rl �if:r h�-rutc Ai +A) of,t,w-mtAx14> l tv— IS . t� A a.t4 tor.0.4t-t- Y . .* leeliotAK-ext ? Z) A-ratk.c ro-Npoirc_oc refritt . ) -t'Lt a ,C4t ' 1Lu.-a v-v-rb. iu-tL t4'&v . h - !A- 4 latie•Vt. trudierc.it e--Adet 40cAL.A... We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where . additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. • _A VIII 1r t\inlyAtAtedir zoo)tri., Signature a'? Director or uthorized Representative Date Form 4 0,7 ri NTON E 2149N ENvIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE Li [ I;. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po P_ n ,,,1 i ' .LI b 'j DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1987• EFC - 078 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM.-013-87 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES . PROJECT TITLE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SQUARE FEET AND 19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELLNES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET .OF. P-1 CHANNEL. LOCZTED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 197,750 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ddtioadditional nal information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEEt REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: of iv .mac . DATE CIRCULATED: OCTOBER 22. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: NOVEMBER 5, 1987• EFC - 078 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87, SHORELINE MANAGEMENT: SM=013-87. PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES . . S PROJECT TITLE: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V, BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF TWO 3-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND FOR TWO 1-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SQUARE FEET AND 19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELLNES LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITH 200 FEET .OF. P-1 CHANNEL. LOCZTED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 13.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 197,750. SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources L/ 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use !/ 9) Housing v 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation !/ 15) Public Services 16) Utilities C/ COMMENTS: Cr� 1 4141111111 iCIPP1 CITY OF RENTON REcElvED OCT2 7 RI.III a /ZONING r�-'" We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed Ito properly assess this proposal. Signature c( i ector or Autho ized Representative Date Form 4 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION An u ra y Et nne r ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the vorlCE OF PUBLIC HEARING r1ENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON VALLEY DAILY NEWS A public hearing will be held by the Ren- ton Hearing Examiner at his regi ,* meet- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ing in the Council Chambers on tt econd floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers February 16, 1988,at 9:00 a.m.to consider are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six the following petitions: IVER monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed andpublishedFIRST CORPORATECIEYPARK—EQUITIES PHASE IV&V) — IV&V) in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Application for site plan approval to Count Washington.The ValleyDailyNews has been approved as a legal allowu the aconstr74tion of two three-storyc Y� g PP g buildings having 74,000 sq. ft. each and for newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. County. ft. and development 19, 0sq. ft. and substantial shore- Kingpermit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 chan- The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition nel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oaksdale Ave. S.W. File , Renton Edition , Auburn Edition , (and not in Nos. ECF-078-87;SA-090-87;SM-013-87. supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Legal descriptions of the files noted duringthe below statedperiod.The annexed notice a above are o file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. All interested persons to said petitions Notice O f Public hearing are invited to be present at the public hear- was published on February 5 , 1988 R2787 ing on February 16, 1988, at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News Feb. 5, 1988. R2787. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 22 .40 • Subscribed and sworn to before me this"7 to day of F e 19 b b Notary ubl� the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11 86 :111L1:117 FIRST CITY February 23 , 1987 EQUITIES �./ / , Mr. Donald K. Erickson /,j 1 Zoning Administrator // 3195> ; CITY OF RENTON i JCr ` Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue So. 7 Renton, WA 98055 RE: Site Plan Approval Phase IV 74,000 Sq. Ft. 3-Story Office Building BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the Environmental Review Committee' s mitigating conditions imposed for the preliminary Determination of Non-Significance for the site plan approval of the Phase IV 74 ,000 square foot 3-story office building in the Blackriver Corporate Park. I have included copies of letters from my project team responding to the mitigating conditions in detail. Their letters, as well as this summary, should be entered for the record and taken into account in the final decisions. ITEM #1 ERC Condition #1 : Building to be sited to create a physical noise barrier between vehicular parking and circulation areas. FCE Response: The proposed site plan complies with condition #l. The building has been situated on the site to comply with fire and emergency vehicular access, maximize site utilization efficiencies, and act as a buffer between the parking areas and the natural area easement. In addition, the positioning of the building places the main entrances away from the ditch, causing the least demand for the parking stalls 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments Mr. Donald K. Erickson February 23, 1987 Page Two abutting the natural area easement. In summary, we believe our current plan meets the intent of Condition #1, while still complying with other applicable regulations. ERC Condition #2: Existing mature trees on site should be retained to the greatest extent possible since these provide habitat for birdlife, retain soil, contribute moisture to surrounding air, provide color, and help to visually define the site. FCE Response: The proposed site plan complies with condition #2. FCE is committed to saving as many large trees as possible for the office park. All of the significant trees between the building and the ditch are being retained. Careful planning in locating the building and parking areas enable us to . retain major trees for the enhancement of the project. ERC Condition #3 : Vehicular circulation and parking areas (because of noise, glare, etc. ) should be set back at least 660 feet from Blue Heron nesting areas unless screened or buffered to reduce their intrusions on these areas where sited closer than 660 feet. FCE Response: The proposed site plan compliies with Condition #3 . Although a portion of the northwest parking lot encroaches within the proposed 660 foot setback, that area is buffered by a 40-80 foot width of 50-80 feet tall cottonwoods. It is, however, of the utmost importance to clarify that although Phase IV complies with the proposed 660 foot setback, in Mr. Van Wormer' s expert opinion, building setbacks of 400 ft. from the center of the rookery are sufficient for protection of the heron. As it is our desire to create an office park that compliments and enhances the beauty of the natural environment, we are implementing Mr. Van Wormer' s recommendations in our planning for Blackriver Corporate Park. Mr. Donald K. Erickson February 23 , 1987 Page Three ERC Condition #4: The building shall be designed to be as harmonious as possible with the natural environment in order to create as natural an environment as possilbe for fauna in the adjacent nature area. The exterior surfaces shall utilize earthen colors and textures rather than brightly colored or reflective surfaces. FCE Response: Condition #4 contradicts the intent and authority of the Site Plan Ordinance which states: "Site plan review does not include design review, which addresses the aesthetic consideration of architectural style, exterior treatment and colors. " We object to; this conditionon the grounds that it is expressly, outside the intent of the ordinance. Further there is no evidence to substantiate potential significant impacts to fauna by colors or textures of building surfaces. It is an established fact that most animals are colorblind and unable to distinguish on the basis of color. ,/ While we do propose a harmonious planning solution for the ,i project, no basis exists to make this mitigation request a condition for threshold determination. (See item #5 regarding reflective surfaces. ) ERC Condition #5 : All glazing facing onto the nature environment to the north shall be non-reflective coated in order to reduce the likelihood of birds flying into these surfaces. FCE Response: The selection of glass is governed by several issues: energy code compliance, material availability and cost, aesthetics and potential hazard to wildlife. It is not in our best interest to use: a glazing material that will n present a greater risk to our tenants and building managers , as well as the birds. We will take all of these factors ' + • ; ° into consideration in the final selection of the glass for `;` the project. > ; f Mr. Donald K. Erickson • February 23 , 1987 Page Four ERC Condition #6 Construction activity (until the building is hermatically sealed) shall be limited to the months of July, August, September, October, November and December. FCE Response: FCE objects to condition #6. The Phase IV building is approximately 700 ft, from the center of the rookery with a dense buffer of mature vegetation between them. Rex Van Wormer has informed FCE that there is no need for a time limit on the construction of ,Phase IV and has received concurrance of this from Ted Muller of the Washington State Department of Game in a personal communication on site February 19, 1987 and again on February 20, 1987 by telephone. ERC Condition #7: • Mechanical systems shall not exceed a noise level of 75 decibles measured at the source. The King County Department of Health, Noise Control Division shall perform a noise analysis prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits. FCE Response: FCE objects to condition #7 on the basis that again under • SEPA guidelines, one must first establish the potential for significant adverse impacts. Mr. Van Wormer establishes in his attached letter that to his knowledge no studies have determined that urban noise levels would disturb herons, particularly consistent, low level and predictable sounds such as that generated by mechanical systems. Our units will be screened both visually and acoustically. Restricting the mechanical systems to 75 decibels is excessive. Since no potential significant adverse impacts will result from the use of standard,mech'anical systems that meet applicable code requirements, this condition has no basis for inclusion and should not be imposed. / Mr. Donald K. Erickson February 23 , 1987 Page Five ERC Condition #8: Lighting shall be shielded at the source to ensure that it does not result in visible glare (below an angle of 30 degrees with the horizon) . FCE Response: • We have designed our lighting levels to reduce glare on site, eliminate glare entirely offsite and shield the light source by using fixtures specifically engineered to reduce glare and control light dispersion. But an angle of 30 degrees with the horizon is restrictive, according to my architect, Mr. Royce Berg. Further, Mr. Van Wormer has indicated that the heron will not be adversley affected by the project's lighting. Therefore, condition #8 should be edited to indicate that lighting fixtures should be selected for their ability to reduce glare and control light dispersion onsite. ERC Conditions #9 & 10: 9. All vehicular storage areas must be sealed with a membrane to prevent infiltrants of hydrocarbons to the soil layer, with asphalt covering the sealant. 10. All runoff from vehicular storage areas shall be sealed with a membrane to prevent infiltrants of hydrocarbons to the soil layer with asphalt covering the sealant. FCE Response: As discussed in Mr. David Morency' s February 20, 1987 memo, since the legal basis for making this request derives from SEPA and since before requesting mitigation under SEPA one must first establish the potential for significant adverse impact, and since Mr. Morencyclearly establishes that no significant impact potential exists, FCE concludes there is no basis for requesting the fabric liner mitigation. We, therefore, object to this condition. Mr. Donald K. Erickson February 23 , 1987 Page Six ERC Conditions #11 & 12: 11. All runoff from areas be processed through regularly cleaned oil/water spearators. 12. In order to protect the waterfowl and fish, measures shall be taken to intercept floating debris and pollutants before it enters the forebay. FCE Response: The measures should be implemented to mitigate potential runoff impacts. FCE is committed to providing these necessary and desirable mitigating measures and has been working with Mr. Joe Robel, Department of Fisheries, in the design of biofiltering vegetation for the ditch area. ERC Condition #13 : The building should be sited to act as a screen and buffer between parking and service areas and the nature environment to the north. FCE Response: Condition #13 seems to be a reiteration of condition #1. The proposed site plan is in compliance with the intent of this condition. The building is situated as a buffer between the natural area and the parking areas to the extent possible and still remain within Fire Department code compliance for emergency vehicle access. ERC Condition #14: The applicant shall work with Metro on developing a transportation management plan in order to reduce on-site parking. In no case shall parking exceed minimum code requirements. Mr. Donald K. Erickson February 23 , 1987 Page Seven FCE Response: FCE has already established with Metro a Transportation Management Plan for the entire Blackriver Corporate Park. This plan is currently in operation on our existing Phase I and II buildings. Since the plan already exists, there is no need for the first sentence of condition #14. Regarding the second sentence which restricts parking to minimum code requirements, FCE needs the flexibility to increase parking stalls when negotiating with certain tenants. In some cases, we have been successful in limiting the additional parking stalls on the basis of net square footage of building space, rather than the gross square footage. However, some tenants require parking at 6 stalls per 1,000 square feet. (City code requires 5 stalls per 1,000 square feet of gross building area. ) Limiting parking. to minimum city standards will effectively, eliminate Blackriver Corporate Park' s ability to compete for certain tenants. Further, since the development' s traffic impacts have already been assessed and mitigated by participation in the Oakesdale LID, further traffic mitigation is punitive. Therefore, we must object to the second sentence in Condition #14 . ERC Condition #15: Facilities shall be provided; on or near the site to accommodate bus service and transit users. FCE Response: Metro has been unwilling to establish defined bus stations or routes without actual demands on the existing road network. However, FCE and Metro are working together to establish planning criteria and optimum station and route locations as the park develops. If this meets the intent of condition #15, FCE has already been in compliance with it. Mr. Donald K. Erickson February 23, 1987 Page Eight Thank you for your consideration' of our concerns. I trust we will reach a satisfactory resolution through this process. Respectfully submitted, FIRST CITY EQUITI S C;24640,06-/ ,Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM/bc cc: ERC Members Enclosures: February 20, 1987 letter to Barbara Moss from Res Van Wromer, Independent Ecological Services. February 19, 1987 letter to Barbara Moss from Bob Roed, Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. February 20, 1987 letter to Barbara Moss from David Morency, Entranco Engineers, Inc. February 20, 1987 memorandum to Barbara Moss from Royce A. Berg, LPN Architects. 4p,—aft,• tea? / 1 CITY OF Rcl4TON FIRST CITY _ FEB 111447 J, February 11 , 1987 EQUITIES BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. Mr. Larry M. Springer Mr. Richard C. Houghton Mr. Ronald G. Nelson Environmental Review Committee CITY OF RENTON Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Phase IV Site Plan Approval 74 , 000 Sq. Ft. , Three Story Office Building BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Dear Committee Members: I am in receipt of the Environmental Review Committee ' s preliminary determination of non-significance with conditions outlined in Donald Erickson' s letter of February 6, 1986 ( sic ) , and am writing to respond briefly to it. It is not clear to me whether the review of this application was conducted without benefit of information contained in Mr. Rex Van Wormer ' s January 31 , 1987 letter report addressing the blue heron issues which we provided at the request of Fred Kaufman in his review of our grading permit (SP 100-86 ) . For example, conditions 1 , 2 , 3 , 6 , and 13 are specifically intended to mitigate heron impacts, although Mr. Van Wormer' s report excludes the Phase IV site from the recommended restricted work area. (See 'attached map #2 from Mr. Van Wormer ' s report. ) Further, clarification of several conditions including 9 and 10 is needed before we can agree to them. I also have other concerns about several conditions included in the proposed mitigation. We believe there are enough issues raised from different departments as well as staff and ourselves to warrant a discussion of mitigation for this building and we request, therefore, an opportunity to meet with the Environmental Review Committee at their regularly scheduled February 18 meeting. As 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments Environmental Review Committee February 9 , 1987 Page Two there is a 15 day comment period which ends February 23, a meeting on the 18th would be timely. Without the opportunity to meet with the committee, First City Equities will be unable to agree to the mitigation conditions as presently suggested. Warm regards, FIRST CITY EQUITIES Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM:bc Enclosure cc: Donald Erickson Charles Blumenfeld, Esq. Royce Berg Rex Van Wormer Ted Holden Robert Roed David Schuman Greg Byler Elliott Severson HAND DELIVERED CITY OF RENTON lECEgVE1 FEB 1 /-1'17 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. It'. SUMMARY OF MITIGATIONS * - Those mitigations which are presently scheduled to be implemented ' • by the developer are noted with an asterisk. EARTH * The City's requirements on grading and excavation will be followed. (Phases 1 and 2) • * The recommendations of the soils engineer will be followed. (Phases 1 and 2) * Detailed soils profiles will be established when final site plans are available. These profiles will facilitate design of the most suitable . • footings and minimize the need for excavation or structural fill to . accommodate accommodate foundations. (Phases 1 and 2) • An alternative site design could preserve the northern portion of Springbrook Creek in open space. (Phase 2) . EROSION Restrict major clearing and filling activities to summer months. (Phases 1 and 2) ▪ Revegetate exposed soils in a timely manner so as to prevent further 11 erosion. (Phases 1 and 2) • Retain vegetation buffer strips between construction activities and ✓ streams and associated wetlands. (Phases: 1 and 2) Phases 1 and 2) whenever P AIR ( ent possible. . * Utilize low-emission construction equipment * _ Measures to control construction dust, such as watering and reseeding of cleared areas, cleaning and sweeping of streets will be implemented. Refer to the mitigating measures under "Transportation/Circulation- • Vehicular Transportation Generated" on page 73 of this document. WATER (Phases 1 and 2) ; * The vegetation along the remaining 1.89 acres of old Black River Channel will be retained and enhanced with additional plantings. * The existing 60-inch storm sewer outfall will be extended approx- imately 550 feet to the west. * All site runoff, save for the northwest portion drainage, will be dis- charged into the upstream end of the old Black River Channel, where it will undergo wetland treatment prior to discharge into Springbrook Creek/Black River. i .f :IlplJ \ • WATER (Phases 1 and 2) * Careful construction practices will prevent litter, debris or other pollutants from entering drainage. Utilize temporary detention ponds during construction phases to collect silt. * Collect stormwater runoff in a storm sewer system, as approved by Renton Public Works Department. Utilize catch basins and screens to collect litter and debris. • Utilize oil/water separators to retain gas, oil and grease for removal from stormwater. Settling. basins would remove solids from runoff. • Skimmers would remove petroleum products and floating debris. ▪ Provide adequate street and parking area cleaning. and maintenance of the stormwater system. - V " * The drainage from the northwest portion of the site will be directed to either an on-site detention pond or the P-1 Channel if it is constructed. ▪ Wetland treatment could be enhanced by constructing a gabion. at the downstream end of the Black River Channel as a means of increasing runoff - detention time and increasing surface water contact area for the one- year storm and smaller flows.. FLORA/FAUNA (Phases 1 and 2) * Retention of as many of the existing trees as possible through sensitive site planning as indicated in Figure 4, p. 2 of the. Draft- EIS. *a . A landscape plan will be prepared to assure good design practice and - consistency throughout the site. * Retain vegetation outside of road and railroad improvements until buildings are constructed, as feasible. • ' The new landscaping plan should include compatible and similar species to the existing vegetation. Minor modifications of building siting could occur based upon tree inventories provided by field surveys. 1 - . * New natural riparian vegetation shall be planted along the drainageway banks, providing cover and habitat. ▪ Utilize landscaping materials that provide food sources for birds and small animals. ▪ Mitigations to preserve surface water quality should be implemented. -72- • ,.A • SUMMARY OF MITIGATIONS, ....ntinued. • NOISE (Phases 1 and 2) * Construction equipment will be operated only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. • * Phased development is planned which will reduce the size of increments of construction noise.• a Construction equipment that will not exceed the State of Washington maximum • environmental noise standards should be employed and operated accordingly. Noisy operations should be scheduled so that they are not concurrent. Truck arrivals should be controlled to reduce vehicle congestion. Construction equipment should be•placed as far from property boundaries as possible. ' ' Siting, landscaping and berming/fencing near main roads could serve to deflect noise impacts. �. Roadway improvements should be timed to alleviate congestion and reduce volumes on existing streets. • Refer to "Vehicular Transportation Generated - Mitigating Measures" below. LIGHT AND GLARE (Phases 1 and 2) * Building wash lighting is not planned. • • Perimeter landscaping, fencing and berming, especially around parking areas and road entrances, could reduce light spillage. Parking area lighting could be limited so that no direct light spills off-site. • TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION 1. Vehicular Transportation Generated J _ * Powell Street will be extended to connect SW 10th Street to Grady Way. (Ph. 1) All on-site intersections be designed with a full 4 lanes (2 lanes in each direction) to provide sufficient room for large trucks to turn without crossing over into the opposite flow, of traffic. (Ph. 1 and 2) • SW 7th and Powell Avenue SW should be channelized to provide four traffic L lanes . (2 lanes in each direction) on a curb-to-curb .street with a minimum width of 44 feet. (Ph. 1) There should be only three access points to the proposed Valley Parkway (SW 7th Street, access to the heavy warehousing and access to the office/ business park) . (Ph. 2) ',Phase 2 development should not be developed until a road (Valley Parkway or a two-lane road) can be constructed along the west side of the project. Any construction should be designed to serve as the first stage of Valley Parkway construction (i.e. , it should not have to be replaced when the Valley Parkway is constructed. (Ph. 2) • -73- • • SUMMARY OF MITIGATIONS, continued. • The proponent could participate proportionately in the signalization of the'intersection of Edwards and 7th. • The proponent could participate proportionately in the construction of the Valley Parkway from Springbrook Creek to Monster Road. • A ridesharing coordinator could be designated and a ridesharing program implemented in order to encourage alternative transportation modes. (Phases 1 and 2) • • All cul-de-sacs Within the project should be designed with a minimum outside radius of 50 feet. (Ph. 1) • All streets internal to the development 'should be a minimum of 34 feet wide with curbs and gutters. The extension of 7th Avenue should be 44 feet wide. (Ph. 1 and 2)• • } All driveways should be 34 feet wide with a 25 foot radius so trucks do not have to cross over into adjacent or opposing traffic lanes. (Ph. 1 and 2) ▪ All curb radii at street intersections should be 25 feet minimum. (Ph. 1 and 2) • • The Powell Avenue SW/Grady Way intersection should be signalized at the time the intersection is constructed. (Phases 1 and 2) • The Powell Avenue SW/Grady Way intersection should be channelized with a westbound right turn lane and an eastbound left turn storage lane when • Grady Way is widened to four lanes. Likewise, the Valley Parkway/Grady Way intersection should be designed in a similar manner. (Ph. 1 and 2) - ▪ As a covenant to the sale or lease of the warehousing or business park, limit the'average square footage of floor space allocated to office-space . • (in contrast to storage or assembly areas) to the following: Heavy warehousing : 10 percent of total building area Light warehousing : 10 percent of total building area Business Park : 20 percent of total building area 2. Parking Facilities • - r Provide sufficient space in loading areas to allow large semitrailer trucks to manuever, i.e. 100 feet from the edge of the loading dock to curb. An alternative would be. to. provide space for parking and/or • . loading inside the building. • All loading, handling and manuevering areas could be separate from the ry: street and sidewalk by some type of raised barrier or landscaping so the street is not used for maneuvering trucks. • "No Parking" signs should be posted along all roads in the development as well as along existing portions of SW 7th Street and Powell Avenue SW and SW 10th Street. • -74- SUMMARY OF MITIGATIONS, continued. 3. Transportation Systems Work with Metro Transit to determine if an existing transit route could be shifted or a new route could be established to run through the proposed site (e.g. Route 155) . (Ph. 2) There appear to be two feasible routes: • a. Phase 1 - Powell Avenue SW (Grady Way to SW 7th Street) and SW 7th Street (Powell Avenue SW to Rainier Avenue S.) b. Phase 2 - Valley Parkway (Grady Way to SW 7th Street) and SW 7th Street (Valley Parkway SW to Rainier Avenue S. ) The applicant should work with Seattle-King County Commuter Pool toward the following: a•. Distribute materials relating to the advantages of carpooling, vanpooling and fleet-ride programs to tenants of the development. b. Work with tenants to permit flextime or at least staggered work hours. c. Within the practical limitations of a multi-tenant development, encourage a carpool and public transit information day twice each year. 4. Movement of People or Goods • Pathways or walkways parallel to all major roads should be provided ✓ (i.e. SW 7th and Powell) . (Ph. 1 and 2) 5. Traffic Hazard ▪ The potential for accidents at railroad crossings should be reduced with the City's signing and street-marking program at railroad crossings. (Ph. 1) ▪ Also refer to the discussion of "Vehicular Transportation Generated - Mitigating Measures" above. PUBLIC SERVICES 1. Fire (Ph. 1 and 2) ▪ The Fire Department should be notified in advance of any extended street blockage. Sprinkler systems installed in buildings would reduce the amount of fire flow required; water storage tanks for the systems could be located in the buildings. • Select building materials that would reduce combustability. 2. Police (Ph. 1 and 2) Internal security systems and security lighting at appropriate strategic locations would augment police protection. Phasing of development will allow police to absorb demand over a period of year. SUMMARY OF MITIGATIONS, cc sion. Sales tax revenues from the proposed development will help offset the cost of additional service. ' 3. Hospital Facilities (Ph. 1 and 2) ▪ Provide on-site. first-aid facilities at major buildings on the site. ENERGY (Ph. 1 and 2) Utilize insulation in roof, walls, flooring and glass. ▪ Perform an energy analysis of building design elements to reduce long- term demand. PUBLIC UTILITIES ( Ph. 1 and 2) * Expansion of the existing' drainage system will be coordinated with and approved by the Renton Public Works Department. * Installation of telephone lines will be coordinated with installation of electrical lines. * All utility services will be installed underground. ▪ See measures for mitigating construction impacts in the section on Water, on page 71 of this document. AESTHETICS (Ph. 1 and 2) * Natural landscaped areas are incorporated into the development. * Site design techniques and landscape development will be used in the proposed development to reduce the effect of bulk and mass in the buildings and provide a park-like atmosphere. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL (Phase 1) * That portion of the site which has been determined to have cultural significance will be retained as open space until excavation can be completed. -76- �.L, Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impacts 0111 Potential alteration of groundwater movement, quantity and quality on the site. 1 . Runoff/Absorption See Surface Water Movement/Quantity/Quality, page 47. ON 5. Public Water Supplies See discussion of Water Supply under "Utilities," pp. 94. D. FLORA 111 Existing Conditions The majority of the site is currently a golf course and much of the vegetation is ornamental in nature and reflects this use. Long, narrow stands of deciduous and coniferous trees are used to define the fairways. Remaining vegetation is primarily lawn, with the exception' of a large stand of scrub Alder occurring in the southeast corner of the site in a filled area. A riparian forest located along the Black River Channel extends into the northern edge of the site. Trees found here are Maple, Black Cottonwood, Oregon Ash and Alder. A moderate understory of broom and blackberries also exists in this area. 111 Impacts Master planning will take into consideration existing stands of trees on the site. All but one acre of the riparian forest along the old Balck River Channel will be retained along with other major stands of trees. Small trees under approximately S'.' in caliper will be 111 relocated if changes in elevation necessitate their removal. Reduction in vegetation will' occur primarily with the large lawn Ellareas and the scrub Alder stand to the southeast. Mitigating Measures (Phases 1 and 2) * a. Retention of as many of the existing trees as possible through sensitive site planning. t1 54 i .., •/�` L S.4e t _r.. 1 i��/ .may,' 0 1,:,,, _;,..i:______,1_ 1111.1 � 0'g O .$ coo °°� 1 tl .e` 1"h1• ,` . IIIIII 0o ° i dbd it ° m �4• F 1'•%\ t II SP ill CGG•�0 •Wp Q // 0 JhUUUUL. O iri • 0 1r, I•0@ 9\ 11111 'Nsimsr...:\, % a' . o% 10 o METRO DISPOSAL c pa • 1 t so f 1.- :::: - ewo r a Pil 4 %I//ii_ Coniferous Evergreens - 14 77/uw predominantly Douglas Fir \ all„, 1I 1 - : (::- 111111 Deciduous ornamental trees - C.( 6 c;o predominantly Cottonwood, 1 0- 11' Lombardy, Poplar, and Hornbeam I ill Riparian Forest - I_405 Deciduous trees and undergrowth adapted to IIN: a wet environment, i.e. , Willow, Cottonwood, Alder lillii �,..,>1 Scrub alder MN vJ ill ill 10. EXISTING VEGETATION ill 141' APPROX. SCALE '1": 600� EAU STON PARK NORTH R W THORPE AND ASSOCIATES firil 55 IE * b. A landscape plan will be prepared to assure good design practice pand consistency throughout the site. * c. Retain vegetation outside of road and railroad improvements until ® buildings are constructed, as feasible. d. The new landscaping plan should include compatible and similar species to the existing vegetation. e. Minor modifications of building siting could occur based on tree inventories provided by field surveys. 10 Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impact 11 Reduction of much of the natural vegetation on the site. E. FAUNA • ® Existing Conditions The project site is located in the Pacific Migratory Bird Flyway and 11 because of its relatively undeveloped condition provides haabitat for many non-resident birds at various times of the year. Some of the birds which have been found on or near the site include Mallards , Canvas Back Ducks, Lesser Scaup Duck, American Coot, Great Blue 11 Heron, Green Heron, Roughlegged Hawk, Screech Owl, Sparrow Hawk. In addition, pheasant, quail and song birds were observed. Several site visits were undertaken for the EIS for Earlington Woods, a Planned Unit Development roughly one mile east of the site which also borders the Riparian Forest. Robins, crows, red shafted flicker, chickadees , juncos , vireos , house sparrow, song sparrow and mallard were observed. These observations are verified by observations on the subject site. 11 Although no census of species has been conducted on this site, a 11 variety of birds are known to inhabit the valley in habitat similar to that existing on this site. The lowlands between Kent and Tukwila 11 provide habitat for a moderate to high density of ring-necked pheasant. California quail, band-tailed pigeons and mourning doves are also found in the Renton area but their population is declining. I 56 � J _ 1114 Many species of waterfowl and shorebirds are found in the wetland 11 areas of the valley, and large numbers of birds winter here. These are primarily mallards, pintails, widgeons, and teal, although the piedbilled grebe, great blue heron, killdeer, common snipe and western gull also utilize valley wetlands. A variety of insect- and seed-eating birds also inhabit the area. Some predatory birds including hawks, eagles and owls have been observed in the valley. These birds utilize the grassy and riparian habitats for their food supply, preying on small mammals, birds, reptiles and insects. The following species, whose range includes the Green River Valley, are on the official list of endangered species: Aleutian Canada goose, American and arctic peregrine falcons, and the northern bald eagle. The Soil Conservation Service reports that no sightings have been made in the lower valley, so it is only known to be potential habitat for these species. 1110 Because suitable habitats have been reduced significantly by human activities in the lower Green River Valley, few large mammals are 111 still found in the area. Fur bearers (racoons, mink, beaver, otter, weasel, muskrat, skunk and red fox) have utilized lowland streams and marshes in the past, but reduction of riparian habitat has reduced 111 the number and diversity of animals remaining. The site provides mainly grassy and riparian habitats, with seasonal standing water providing habitat for migratory water fowl. Small mammals such as shrews , mice, bats , rabbits , chipmunks, 111 squirrels and rats may still be found on or near the site. A Washington State Department of Fisheries report indicates that Springbrook Creek is one of the more important tributaries supporting runs of Coho and chum salmon. Other anadromous fish using these d; waters include steelhead, sea-run cutthroat trout and Dolly Varden. 57 I Impacts Development of the site will cause an intrusion of human activity and removal of large amounts of grass lands and stands of trees, used as cover and fodder for numerous small mammals and birds, themselves in turn, the food supply for predators. Resident species will therefore be driven off, displaced and, where alternative habitat is already occupied, their numbers will be reduced in competition for the limited habitat. Migratory and predatory species using the site as 1(11 part of their feeding or resting area may also be wholly or partially displaced, especially species not tolerant of human presence. Numbers will also be reduced as there is a reduction in the food supply. Degradation of water quality in Springbrook Creek could have an adverse effect upon the fish population; turbidity, especially, would affect the health of Juvenile fish. Higher water temperatures could also adversely affect fish. Mitigating Measures (Phases 1 and 2) a. Retain as much natural vegetation as possible. b. Natural riparian vegetation could be planted along the drainageway banks, providing cover and habitat. 111 c. Utilize landscaping materials that provide food sources for birds and small animals. 111 d. Mitigations to preserve surface water quality should be implemented., including maintaining wetlands in the northeast portion portion of the site adjacent to the office park. Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impact Reduction in number and diversity of wildlife species will occur as a result of habitat modification. F. NOISE ,Noise levels in this statement are expressed in A-weighted decibels, or dBA, which best describes Ithe human perception of noise levels. Each increase of 10 dBA in the noise level is subjectively judged as an approximate doubling of loudness. NI • 58 ii it .4 it 1 MI4 , J I I It/ 171 01E% 1 i I kefldf#14). (1,14/14 /*Wilk . i /_ i ,./1/ , ., .0.4., r .... of / ,Il,1 kit offrip . , I .11 I --)-- , 4./..fr ,, , / , . , , . , p5 . 1 47 % u . , _ ., i I /4�/ , ' i, ------0,,effir. 1 1 . , , ) , be a4meii .4y/ 4//.0.# kJ, ‘ „ , , , . . „, ,. I _r L/./ A /• _ . i_.. /L.�!�f/____ . r/_ A.' .� ...,.a.' l-4.L�r. jr/ , , / freSr / 1; i ... 4,14.. ..„,;,L. .i ISIFfi 11 4n14441 ," , C4'el 414 a bailie ,,,/ . ,i, ...,,,,/ ,. ! 1 , 7 Mg/ ,i -44074-44w—dize oft) a -4-0 ) ,, , i , .1 . ,,„e...,...Ar r 1 ..,. //if i 1 '... ii"..,/ / ' Aid 2?/ 4 4 ii /- A _ -../ Apir/2,/4,, , . / . Aii, i-' _::I.,.. . .. :..,' J,.. j.i.,,LA.,. ... . _... /./, . . il it . i II II ii II IN !; _-- 11 ,I 1 i i {i - II 1 I, --— - — --------u L ---- --- ------- li • ©D `1• 00 A.i; CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor • • Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: February 1, 1988 • TO: Fire Prevention Bureau - FROM: Building & Zoning Department SUBJECT: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK File # SA-090-87 • The Building & Zoning Department today received a revised site plan for the above referenced project, This plan was .provided by the applicant in order to address City concerns-with site circulation, allowing some par.king .to beset aside in reserve, saving more existing mature trees and to provide some active recreation on the site. This project is scheduled to be heard before the Hearing Examiner on February 16, 1988.. Therefore, we would appreciate a quick response. from your office of any concerns you see with this revision. Thank you. • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 --(206) 235-2540 o� � JACK S. WAYLAND Director 144/889 i0Y STATE OF WASHINGTON T y OF RE,NTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE �F^. !F-, S V Region 4 (206) 775-1311 I ) L� 16018 Mill Creek Boulevard t J N 29 Mill Creek, WA 98012 ��Q�n01 S January 28, 1988 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. Donald K. Erickson Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 • Re: Application No. SM-013-87; Blackriver Corporate Park--Phase IV and V; MDNS Dear Mr . Erickson: The Department of Wildlife concurs with the determination and supports the proposed mitigation. Sincerely, THE DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony a ann Habitat Biologist TO:td cc: Habitat Management Division - Olympia • ,40 CITY ,IFF 4"JENTON L BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 20, 1988 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building and Land Dev. Division 450 King County Admin. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Re: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V, File Nos. ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74; 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 00 sq. ft and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-i channel, file nos. : ECF- 078-87 and SM-013-87. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on February 1, 1988 . Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, bnc, . Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cb Cover 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 yyhh -�`` °�0f' �v CITY OF RNTON 4 eta =� BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 20, 1988 Roger Kluck 8916 20th Avenue N.E. Seattle, WA 98115 Re: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V, File Nos. ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 Dear Mr. Kluck: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30, 750 sq. ft. and 19, 00 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel, file nos. : ECF- 078-87 and SM-013-87. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on February 1, 1988 . Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, ,. r \Clot ri. , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cb Cover 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 / dD ®® .L F CITY Off' ' ENTON ,' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 20, 1988 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V, File Nos. ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 00 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel, file nos. : ECF- 078-87 and SM-013-87. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on February 1, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied, by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cb Cover 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 4'0 CITY OF RENT 'IN , New ata '' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 20, 1988 Joe Robels Dept. of Fisheries Habitat Management Division Room 115, M.S. AX-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V, File Nos. ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 Dear Mr. Robels:, . Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 00 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-i channel, file nos. : ECF- 078-87 and SM-013-87. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the Cityvs Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on February 1, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the determination should be revised. and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cb Cover 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 �p CITY c 3�F RENTON e'`''° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 20, 1988 Department of Wildlife 16018 Mill Creek Blvd. Mill Creek, WA 98012 Re: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V, File Nos. ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 00 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-i channel, file nos. : ECF- 078-87 and SM-013-87. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on February 1, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP koAzs Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cb Cover 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 4A w -3 CITY ISIF }RENT N BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 20, 1988 Shelly Anderson 13618 S.E. 180th Renton, WA 98058 Re: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V, File Nos. ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 Dear Ms. Anderson: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30, 750 sq. ft. and 19, 00 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel, file nos. : ECF- 078-87 and SM-013-87. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on February 1, 1988 . Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cb Cover 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the /9 day oftax-cJ , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United tates a healed envelope containing documents. This information was sent to: NAME: REPRESENTING: FG LL4a.J PaAE g/Lat.eid, ,96/itoz- */y)1 gO(/9t keICA L-7tA-k) 1C)6( Aw /012 e D OP J. 41 Z,d_dd.4 SIGNED BY: C . SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 1988. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at , therein. Project Name and Number: " J~ r* wi t t:.6• m* r.M .Ai., i ' i:, u.`S&' a1,t �,lr d I G4' r"3�s ^l,+' R�ii ,°A'! ""c :,a✓4.d �rq��r �a" '� 4e+. 71 m' f P .; # ( (Ap x'q D,r, +s ,4}�A a t °.P ,,' r.E " 4, . Nre ° , d .,4 tle, 6'' � '" r t f1i C{ @�� o G'f I - 4. r$ �,, r 4014sV e P ks �' 4 q P r '.,e qJ l a�. �g�rn +: gi > .A r .r, ;Ir i k �d.1 r 1,,, I`,, '�yzr v,;,„ t� ♦�lxt- .,f �. ' .. ¢,.µ. '4 .7 ' ,�4A. 't I R " !y , 1rt.:, -,. '',Y 1 i,,,Al «�,M1x th�i�'�r3"4 -r',Id ,"� 4«ryit,) z i ,t A 1 4,, A4 ;;� Ft'.' (i 'I 7 � �' „T' 11ff 2;i1k1r ke «'4 .....:i. R F4 .[h e 5' `+{, 30) y,' I�gyvt?1 i i 1 rt i ,� n i r�„t,g 'Y t [, k Ip . J ;G § t�q R` S��kr w9 7 ; t k `ea * PPa 1 X'h?fd,YV,r'... It � 5 :�t 1` q.' ,�'Y�. xt..q�n a;"1'°r � +4X"�CT e� �. �iA��r�i 4'�� r fie ��;�`�i�`� .�" �-.' � .,�G� .i�,''� te .�;�1.a,etM'•l�i,.$` NI• �'.' ,$ `� � ��:. A' 4 '�� � 4A,�i;P a F-�y +, ,M s4'.tr M .�'��rC+ � v .'y�ry q r kyA,��H.. 9 .i fo. r "i A ' tr„ =i f 3 f I x x y4'I �+ A" w i L''' h i .:�� >�;"' '; �� � ¢,fi�,j rrfi:. 4at �t .�z, t� ° � t�"� �e +! o Y p a s.r 7,1per . "i, sr r 'K a� ft .1 P gya: :', ,,, #- 6 a1' S: ;= a} 0 ., '.,eti.°® ,, ,p - .2`� ,P?��{I� On'GG,, °.°47,,,:%A�" .a`,,` ,g I k ` ...G`"-'a�9.��`EX yy1%s'�7 ,rays!•m® ®,f Per®"} +e €3 Y{ a '.�k'. y9 Y �>'��'•y �s'!!.I d +�'� ,n .'�- -,,, �S,CPi` Ff, Ru 4�' rgSn "' ..7 �v "'A„Py' 'r .8,, '?£sSY:` ...., .� '�,.s'�+ } '%i..+t�i,, dm ,,,'��[, January19, 1988 ' ) _. l; " 1; al;q N 411 JP f L2',, 1Q00 Mr. Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park (Valley 405 Portions) Dear Mr. Erickson: For your information, we would like to advise you of the planting of buffer trees in the areas established by the City Council ' s appeal decision on the grading and fill for the Valley 405 portions of this site° New trees will be planted in the 200 ft, setback areas on First City property within 1000 ft. of the Heron Rookery. No grading or fill will take place nor removal of any existing trees. The planting of trees will be completed prior to the end of January, and the date established by the City Council. ) Si erely, l� �I Ro ce A. Ber P esident cc: Jerry Lind, City of Renton David Schuman Barbara Moss Mark Miller Ted Holden NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated following project(s) : . FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASE IV & V Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19,000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. File Nos. ECF-078-87 and SM-013;87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by February 1, 1988. Published: January 18, 1988 s10 Co 7 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-078-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SM-013-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three- story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline develop- ment permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. PROPONENT: First City Equities LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. The Committee' s determination is final and may be appealed to the City' s Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 p.m. on February 1, 1988 . Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filling fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: January 13, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: January 18, 1988 ilf agittea,•a; I tonald"G. Nelson arr Sprin•=r Building and Zoning Director Policy-velopi•nt Director ichard C Houghton Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-078-87 APPLICATION NO. : SM-013-87, SA-090-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three- story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft: each and for two one-story buildings having 30, 750 sq. ft. and 19, 000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. CONDITIONS: 1. That efforts be taken to preserve the wildlife habitat provided by major trees on the two sited by reducing the amount of surface parking provided (up to 25% of required parking can be set aside in landscaped reserve areas) and rearranging vehicular circulation patterns if necessary. Note to applicant: When the applicant can show the City's landscape architect that new tree plantings have matured to a point where they provide an equivalent or better wildlife habitat, some of these existing trees could be removed. 2 . That impervious surfaces not be allowed to intrude within the drip line area of existing specimen trees being retained on these two sites. 3 . That additional on-site recreational amenities (indoor and outdoor) be provided to the satisfaction of the City's landscape architect in both phases of development for the use of the project's estimated 620 plus employees. 4. That all surface water drainage untreated by grass-lined swales be processed through oil/water separators approved by the Public Works Department. I p • NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL nECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-078-87 AND SM-013-87 APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER' CORPORATE PARK-PHASE IV&V) PROPOSED ACTION. APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO THREE-STORY BUILDINGS AVING 74,000 SQ.FT. EACH AND FOR TWO ONE-STORY BUILDINGS WITH 0,7H5O AND 19,000 SQ FT. AND PERMIT TO ALLOW SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 2u0 FT. OF P-1 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS CHANNEL. PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF S.W. 7TH ST. AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVE .S.W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ' ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES ff DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT I WILL ><DWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., fEBRUARY 1, 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated following project(s) : . FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASE IV & V Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. File Nos. ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by February 1, 1988 . Published: January 18, 1988 5)0 6 7 r/' "- CITY OF RENTON ha BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 5, 1988 Shelly Anderson 13618 S.E. 180th Renton, WA 98058 RE: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V Dear Ms. Anderson: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 6 CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 5, 1988 Joe Robles Department of Fisheries Habitat Management Division Room 115, MS AX-il Olympia, WA 98504 RE: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V Dear Mr. Robles: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : 1 ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 235-2540 a :6). CITY OF RENTON mai '' BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director January 5, 1988 Roger Kluck 8916 20th Avenue N.E. Seattle, WA 98115 RE: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V Dear Mr. Kluck: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, U ate Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 _ O DultU( " STATE ?N I•�'� ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER wN'.€, Director '?4;.1 1889 a'3Y STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 g DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 January 4, 1988 CITY OF RENTON rD � CLf VE igJAN 61338 Environmental Review Committee BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Committee members : Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the construction of Blackriver Corpo- rate Park, Phase IV and V. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments . It appears that a small portion of the site is within the ju- risdiction of the Shoreline Management Act . Any development , including fill , that takes place within this area will re- quire a shoreline substantial development permit . The proposed project must comply with the goals and standards of the local shoreline master program. If you have any questions, please contact Ms . Terra Prodan of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459-6789. Sincerely, Donald J. Bales Environmental Review Section DJB : cc: Linda Rankin 3 • . RE' EIVED Jamul 0 41987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. (' M✓1 • - G`o�v P_L//J 6- i5/ g 1 ucc CoRPo,i4Tf. Pig IS._ • 61 3 -y / SA --69 o - 9 7, ___1� 6 airy of: 7 •To I /A 011- T( E le C Go i Dirtaiu.c All Apoi./(a I z f-o- •Tff k A/ L Pi 0 •-r7 c/$l of - f�.�15 'T r L l2 •!fA:D I- o -iM n 7-v • iA•T W6 ' CorAmaNiTS ��el,3Er, 'sac5 IAAAk)L' REkYThN i e S /DES T 5,C F 1ft6 aVE1i'6 L0e6 5 _dl." E 1) fP- 1E LE 1' t6i4 L A' ',2c?a4c# . 1 .a) Y A •�. 5-17 A P Lif I=a2r •171 - JCL a e4k 7 6P i--0 S /-4,c4 210i r� S it 1�5 6 1W 6. /ADE• 4414576.e- 'FP6o 2 A. Tim 41/—_V1-ed5 city r3 F , ,L Tc k ) L.e ,4L Di S -7/ P1/L 6,t-d ,7/ F >':�1/1-7-6 ,51 14- P&.--rrT/Gn (LJr L L 1G_ILf__ s r.LA-6,c_r) i 11 L, A erg A l F ApY_'P6/4-6/t p t'i O 5-1 Ctj 5 `PEz_ 'jrroa �__Lu �0_"_ 6 E £i_ 1Dk) -2) .'E • A- C LfL)Q i 5i fL16"- All U SL dt? c.0 P Ni dlT •712(a2/ u i s •-Eo ,4®t,i t�C-IL) ET- 0 cue k_GE R TC ;(}, -- IT 'CD N_.)s P�-7TLrii f -ex i CD F Uo i t..4) i 4± A Lo C- i.,D i..-i a Foe_ u`P_11 .)6-- PrN, fri-71-=41 Loo2 4-1 k162 `PG5i .L IL10tc- {4 i, 1+,l.5 g t R( i P F4GE. OC-,a,P0JC � I LA 4t���rE i S : T F1'.LD OFFtCF 7P-A-g-r, lk _ C•i6 UA3 G 'OF TI-U • RG%/ IIV16.Let JAN 0.41987 'PG . BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. T Go m tiv\ 6> i.M I TreE S G - _ 1Ota (`<"l calJ a; To r'�YA-(dJ t 11L-.D L,t .17 1 T�(L ��� , Rek2)i U K) *A.5 (),Do4 E� 4-1-(2) -co 6M9 RcynA is tr�- Ai.DD d K i-i-�C-. EU�L oPE� ido 7 'tD t.QT-t - CO E T t if( RC-rt"t31L•J5 OF L LLJ LeLs 7 `: 1-A-5 A t , Pg ,-c -A I��. Le'A5 A- c 6(ZA- S T4+ Vr �aLs -ov i s i 6�k0L • 2m i s 1A1u0 ks, C I cfD 1c Ft (LP 1Z 6D c c1 Lt) ,5 GO L �c4�5i . f P�(LJ , LL 1 t�� �4 �t�t �c,1� �c� Cxt s/ aoi-DP 11-1 o iV c2(�Tf C[�P��'© t 1�5_tia I S 55 5_r.ti►jA1_. AiQ r) 11t G UGL I\A( 1— ct- �itbL LI2�C� co/N3 (� 2 1� .—L TAU-- .--rg_ Dtv .-rs I�s Ftf t4t)C �3 ) c $E I3 / fii& ti__A l_-Acc S �l-f ice, i t- E-5 F /k c 7,4 L7 6 F A Ce. g,(2._y_i)o FO//- c>>J ' ff'co 1t'C R y.: 2(JE,,' lit 6-' P-1 Q2 OUE . �,l -r- •Z &L S d 5/0c_o_u.4j ' 'E i7 l) -t- ��7" .,� 7'E U vL_LS 7-1 GFt mA1.. 7 h & 3L(- c6 A/y NA-5 ; `-- -- F,9 73 6" l-Mr E OJ}}is co421126,e. c:-#C* -rhu 6-- A- 5CP6:2)4 7O/3 fJ N 2ON s -TC) dor P -rite, OI /z-g T? 1,ZK T7t& jiJo- tJ 5 f/Oci, S; j lfl � 6)0e ( c--P rA-L-sD AIL) L0 L> COOL A/up Stf ol.(L P C-a/1 S/b- ie c[� Lvrt-1:7(1iF-6; /)% Tit 6A J R I LkIL CIA LL ' '-rff6 RCMA/A)/IUG CAL6 644.0 .7rP-A- z LA/1/ C GO6-5S &F 7 75 JAN 0 41987 .26 3 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. C V j r5 (A)/Lb L✓F 0 -'I-1.)aC cz-ice'f �7� L.5 Li iig t_ 7" C& .i 140©,s f4L a ti C� -mot i} �;, G,giy� 5 ,4✓'O Riec�5 A-- ' ei0/11,!2 /�C�MA-/� / C�� (���l�6tu'i f 1-11-77.n0 t FAO /j Cr A-R'r45 C.6� o/lj .� W0/1 C / r2 eo ✓14 Ek.:1 �1 Cc-F /v16 4 PP o c E A licaP fib, / % i -Lbc) LL. li-A-C.3 6F TM i.5 0_�(±,•r AO.i A-/O1.tk) C ,PE Al rdel Lt l� 1= 4 L : IGL'_i S to COYyI LJ , / z.-60 c 44-Tr 'zD /� i/ 77‘41-iv/e>lc) 6- 74/L) v,e ISM ivi G %f�� E/'c ✓ C try CA9 cc/u C I Z_. /k 1) fJ I IO L S coccci. ,66 14 5/ c- OiL) -c7- r F S1 64ow,P 6- 2/r y F _5106c L-13 i-'y F f 6i0 7-0 A-) FP T i fl/ `4ti• c r s L j I1V A rio U TifF /C l�/If�r4 L- APOA to P.OAct-f (.t u> 5A L) C, ,W /Z •i i-M A) AiO iL:CLc).4_,A2 (--r6,11 Lc:GLL _6 1.9 oa-r" 172,41u, ALL i '77) (ctL-LL' A Ke 'iuTeI,k) 7 2OC�Q _ olb >2 -r'/ -Pao F6 [s ' / A L -T{tE i3,e�i�hKTJ�_ �G H L :t 1 - i. ?Roc s,s, iko 5r s✓i' CD c r 70 e-:,c5-r6 co✓LL i&) 'Tff-E "7'1EC.F tvl L D Fil i 5'0 720 :lP(,:c.c A/a7, •-rkL&: 7,e6:51,41 e, - U F AM�ijyi6 S -rfr/ T c,�c%1? E :lte 1 Lt_pC o-rod /cLV'D ,5O IA S 6-go 111140 / 904r y&tre-- i% /D 4/2j,J6- -r -is OF Rsli• 6 Q ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z rn �9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0/TKO SEP1c_0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning 800 Fifth Ave. , Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V Dear Ms. Moss: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs OF I �y Q ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 p9 � 0 SEPI-���P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, WA Re: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, V Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs OF R4,� �� © ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z rn O 9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- 094te0 SEPjE ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building and Land Dev. Div. 450 King County Admin. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 RE: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, r MI Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs OF I 16 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR isAL aims CI)O MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9,0 �• 0,91t 0 SEP�����P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 RE: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Ajti Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs OF R4,A A. �y Q ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O,9gT�0 SEP�E1O0P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Review Division METRO 821 2nd Avenue, M.S. #92 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: First City Equities, Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V Dear Mr. Bush: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-078-87 and SM-013-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. S ' ly, 04Vidit Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-078-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SM-013-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three- story buildings having 74 , 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30, 750 sq. ft. and 19 , 000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline develop- ment permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel . PROPONENT: First City Equities LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from December 21, 1987 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , January 4 , 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS . Responsible Official : Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: November 18, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: December 21, 1987 R d G. Ne a ryM. Spri er Building and Zoning Director Policy velo ent Director Richard C. oughton Public Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES • PROJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-078-87 APPLICATION NO. : SM-013-87, SA-090-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three- story buildings having 74, 000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30, 750 sq. ft. and 19, 000 sq. ft. and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave,. S.W. CONDITIONS: 1. That grass-lined swales be provided along the west property li parallel to Oakesdale Ave. S.W. in order to provide additional biofiltering for stormwater run-off. 2 . That efforts be taken to preserve the wildlife habitat provided by major trees on the two sited by reducing the amount of surface parking provided (up to 25% of required parking can be set aside in landscaped reserve areas) and rearranging vehicular circulation patterns if necessary. Note to applicant: When the applicant can show the City's landscape architect that new tree plantings have matured to a point where they provide an equivalent or better wildlife habitat, some of these existing trees could be removed. 3 . That impervious surfaces not be allowed to intrude within the drip line area of existing specimen trees being retained on these two sites. 4 . That additional on-site recreational amenities (indoor and outdoor) be provided to the satisfaction of the City's landscape architect in both phases of development for the use of the project's estimated 620 plus employees. 5. That all surface water drainage untreated by grass-lined swales be processed through oil/water separators approved by the Public Works Department. • cj jacto N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-078-87, SA-090-87, SM-013-87 . A f f I I5i1 NT FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKR I VER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO THREE-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74, 000 SQ , FT . EACH AND FOR TWO ONE-STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30, 750 SQ . FT . AND 19, 000 SQ . FT . AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVEL- GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESSOPMENT WITHIN 200 FEET OF P-1 CHANNEL . PROPERTY LOCATED AT S . W. 7TH STREET AMD EAST OF OAKSDALE AVE . S . W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL -; WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY r OOPM JANUARY 4, 1988. AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NotEnvDet/Dskl ValMed NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - PHASES IV & V) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74, 000 square feet each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 square feet and 19,000 square feet, and for substantial shorelines development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. File Nos. ECF-078-W, SA-090-87, SM-013-87. r7 This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. January 4, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2540. Published: December 21, 1987 41 5/b!o 7 • j. MEMORANDUM DATE: Dec. 18, 1987 TO: Jeanette Samek-McKague FROM: Gary Norris SUBJECT: Black River Corporate Park - Latecomer's Fee We have checked our records and confirmed our finding with Loren Davis of Holvick deRegt Koering that all of the Washington Technical Center plat is exempted from the traffic signal latecomer's fee for First City Equities. Please remove this requirement listed on the Black River Corporate Park's development submittal. CEM:ad Attachment wN3ASH I NG N TECHN I L. CENTER .... • . SI/2SECTION 13. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. • N1/2 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M. . _ CITY OF RENTON , P.S. • • ITIC.- �' KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON eziiaoosss /3y ffd-/ov N •, M r• BUSH REED i HITCHIHGS. /ii I • . I : • i H I • • .. .". t .; . •j P. • •iii $ • \ tsar' d ti r • 1 :.--II ,, , , • 1 1►1 i. • 9 II I • 10 ti .�\ s� 1 1 , 'Inure [Af[IM[MT�• 1� , }I 7.IV UTILITY EASEMENT• , 1 ' . ss I ;E•UTLIfT[AII MO 4%1 ,.1 kC ice, -ri �t. , •• •fy+µ•:fii, I �-b MIL ROAD 4. ;A • 1 Ij• 1~ill -_ Q. ,EASEMENT »• UTIUTV EASEMENT •y{=4 .1 `. _........L.L I . • Y. 21--t ,' `�:•.te«N i.061PuPigUT_ S.,),..,s*3T�u«:m{m4:,-t s.x�lU'. :ap.X.,iah•.-.�..i �ei y 7 1 )1r/•I . `1 •J', • r 70•ERW[. EASEMENT 1, 11;I ` 1I AID. /IL[ N4 f70.IM I I•.: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION •1` _� •• • f/1t[MEMT OVE TH[ IV1{.{. -� 1rr l • WT(RLT 11D['�f.1K 1/A• 1. N y • i I Ir •N. 7• WATER LIME•[Af[MC MT �IJ •'� /'•-1♦. ' . • rl , - AID. /IL[NO. ]]69y 11 } ' I I,y� :1 'U'• (WITHIN THI/, A[[A) 111 1 I. • 1 i! y� ` /yam) • 1 ►, l 1 '_3 •1j. � .If UTS f[MEwr 1 ' 1 11 1 ayy`71, ` I 1 iS'ta' Mr PG ; - 41 zs' EASEMENT MA n'sAN{ 1;•' '� ..+ *%.•( MAIN{AUD I,1.[N0. W YM I �1 0 ' ! I 'f^t • • ;rr"- T • '`• .Y.•t, PA • •. • Nti • .ter'.- atiti'l • • ,' • 1 II WM'WI SIAM • 71111•64•w ,,.., ,� ! •.3 . i. • • • .' • 1• • �� 1 :', • SHEET 5 OF •�Ef07.G I.HE PLAT OF • WASHING N TECHNI L CENTER S1/2 SECTION 13. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. W.M. N1/2 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. W.M. • _ `�. CITY OF RENTON -- --- • KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1300 l2� 98-/o L' -i.r•BUSH ROED G HITCHINGS. Inc.. P.S. . 1 • I 1 i ". • . . ) 1 Z,..Ao. 2 "s:Yr-:,a . :..- . Lotoct•H . • • .1 \' • I 1.f.. . •\A.!! • / •43•322.44:---,•4411/Li 1 I e - '''•• ....• . r stb:2% •i 0 YTILITt[Aa[►K MT •',` 7 •.,...:..4v2:0 � 9, i ,j i N.��•�••- 1;. •1.97- __i' —. _ ,t• A` • / I . ,\gyp •` Y! .:1 I:SA1': RcN jM�hT4L V jliQ ' II E . .041.. . 1j i o e f Ito6;1 LANDS I�t- wATCI 4SCMENT I . vletNA7F �, •••"e .. : .. *A NO.MMUS"'-rl iii , I s.1: \IP , • /~ :, .. il • Iii � 1♦ YTILITt aAa[M(NT' Ø"1.L_i....... .____...; ::; •: "I '` �• , l' • • ' • • :/11 I 0,/16.11 • • • - ;1 1 1771 :f • 1:. ` , • w Q • I1 0 . �. I I I� I •r•r•Y7 M.M ' I• 01 1 • •r•r•r.1 . r.•• • •..�_ •�-Is'UTILITY [A•[Mf NT ., r V, \ 1 • . .. e.,(047�• \R''!A ; I�I Mr M•Or PI.IS •I.NI M.r D A• _ • M•r•r M..N WAS w.0 ,I 1 C e \ II I .•M'M• M..N N.N OR 4T 4.. , M•..••• • M.N ' M..N • r.■Q S S`? ,\'..�,i�1tf.� M•MM• O..III •M • rN 1 • 4/16 b TO A • .`-- I. I�i, WA II11 ASUI[NT N.N 11•••. r.. •• I • :fp C - 1, 11 :• • I•\ • , I •. /itl I li. • . . •:I:: • r • r• • 1 /�. ia•A r.rt I7 ' • a.I; L.IpT9� ; i . SHEET 3 OF 5 " . FIG rL_H 1 ur •• . GASH TECHNIAL CENTER Si/2 SECTION i3, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.N. N1/2 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.N. • CITY OF RENTON _ — -� KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON L. eu1300925 ia x 1d.>/0L-I 1� ,.,� i ,rat. i n.�....� if BUSH ROED B HITCHINliB, Inc P.C. • • ' I . :. ' , illst„1 , ' . .1 ; : • . %vs, I/ • 1 .1 ' !I ' � '•#"'70 ••••1, '; �`, • • • •• C► • T r �,' $J > ' • Ii .I:• 'tat . ., a� / Y.LIC b•�Ia'� •• I _,, U UTILITY IATL►A[NT • •. ••rl. ,':• �'! y • I MCI AITI. I •% ITO{M wtI4. • ��� • • j a 4/v DETENTION BASIN PARCEL-., -4,,r4s. 1::----'1 • �� �;<� (DEDICATED TO CITY FOR " '•• N. .' • -: ' I.p r� • STORM WATER DETENTION) K" / • RESERVING AN UNIDEFINED AREA FOR THE �-to.� d K{INNIH{or M'UTILITY •[A[[Y[NT ^ //� EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE LAND ENCOMPASSED BY b •w•wTAi No. THE PLAT OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER FOR -0N 1 ' ;I' ' • ' �J • u1•I.1 ^ ' CONTAINMENT OF STORM WATER RUNOFF AND FL(MNII INUIT) I� • '^�^ ` WATER STORAGE UNTIL •SAID DETENTION AND FLOOD +�.� �,r WATER STORAGE IS PROVIDED FOR THE SAID PLAT. •^y•••. •• • s% ', AREA TO BE DEFINED AT THE' TIME TRACTS A& B ARE _ i j f ■•e , y\ .� PLATTED INTO LOTS OR BEFC.RE JULY 1,1985. REMAINING •rI • d` rc I AREA TO BE USED BY CITY OF RENTON FOR FLOOD A„nµ,``' 1 I9 ' �• wK , I CJ WATER STORAGE,AS THEY SO CHOOSE, L��•��� 1 D ' ,1 oI� • • ,i 4 It/ • • sn` �,' • �i�� ,o;?^.7"i %R. l �p • 11119.001.i1TD•W• ,�N.Y'w•TO'w . . 1- ,I • r f' • • I "1 {'tA•t MINT IrO. SL\ \ rt w•Tlauwc. I I / • ,,. 1Ar.110.7p•070{Oa • • • W i. ,I . , Si1JI •I \ i r1 I Z I )Iee,, . • a I`�` wo rua[�i►to{nioMi '' < ry \ ♦� y •isr I{IAINAK DITCH \ •�''•i[AUHThT A/wD MOH•• • N. • s.:,r .NIM{I AA , �,r•UTILITY [Aa[T•[NT a / . , . \ . i • • q 1 I 0,;:.� rat • ll 4 • • • •\.: .. 3.L L.-, fib!" wrw wr.r• .I A \•\ t -.• - ; ; I • • •n•R••T•"• M.r 1'� • I i i • •w•r•n•• •Wan ,Ei • • • • •".•.•••• U. `• \ r i Ti '. • wawa. s.w swat \♦\„ � i,,�i• I • II '• \ \\ .\ PIS‘13i. 079` ! SHEET 4 OF 5 I • I ht I-'LA I UI— ' WASHINEON TE.CHNFFAL CENTER S1/2 SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP. 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. W.M. N1/2 SECTION 24. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. W.N. CITY, OF RENTON . - -•• • KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON • . .- I�llla°°925 /Xx 1 :- • is VTILITY.LAUEMLw n lA Yr J T�J r� .1.1....1..y.I . 'e �M� M. BUSH ROED C HITCHINGS. Inc.. P.S. - 1- _1Lt. LtMi.�r1 }h -j N N 1�E 1 1 . 1 1 , ria— oT rrn'A 1I !tt>, A11v,Q, Id-1 :-• I•. GTGN ��0• 1 .F I '� L/17a.4LAL[MLNT •I ' i� C ACI° AL. P All • iil R to • • 2� • I i 1 %t`lDvv• �,.63t PAuE N w-a f-'• i 1 ; THOMAS AVE. S.W. I - „A„....... LAUMINT I �k—.—.. —. I-) t AD.FILL NO►LOSApOSY J1 0' �D „�.--...�.�...LLaL'tLYA�t.I.- 1 • I p'Urlll TY arwLt Tif--L- w-�--. 1 1 LASEMENT +I IHS �' LT0+1M LEwtA GLstMENT I I . \• Ertl I! AUO. tY[W.LA770/< 1R I ,'• .\ \ I II La. -..m0 T. i p j 1 .#.. \ \ 1 r` i 1 ■n•.rMY Y.w E I '� I I 1L -'M•-•t -.- I•''70 UTILITY \ I .1•III 1.1. I I £AIIMENr I • I IIII' • �� ar. wll. .,. ,Craw q I Iii. >. I •I , N M.1 Tr• j W . 1 I I 1' T worse. ... -.n -•. H O*N xIIlf I. I I \' •• I H� 1'�•Vow 1l• -.01 -.- OS.IN F R y V ' IL I .M,•:5 1'� Z -'N'-• -.M M.- .1•- 1••-•Y• .1•.. -.N t I: I 2W:..:-3 • I� `�. I W .•1.•.• -T.DO uw.w ..•.. SO 10.111411. On AS SW 44 DM M • IL D. i` I IF I i"�I' N RrL1Nvfri,�y�K Nu. L • I I la I I CAT L ' Ag • • I I I •• 2 I I I� _ .• vat-g3 P���` Q ,'. I -I. L-is I C I N I • I S pppppp R•+se7.' -*' x 1e� I I �Taa�471i �, I .I<0.99' O I q • 'UTILI Tr A I 10•••11 I i AA.7S' -1 i1_ to 1..MLwr I I 17 I FOUND a• L_ _�_ I I ,,o,,I,,.o,T y POWELL AVE. S.li 1t • II II -il-- p.. - .; —.-111'''I*� -------..JJ�' _. ----I — • - ' 1 r -7 - III 1 ' ---- •-F• • ---- 7. • to'UTIIITr a WAla �"-, I •I Itit 4° `t0'U L a wlu -I . II\ tAKMENT I R (hill' , I I I I I 1111 I a �'a CASEMENT I • \ d._7o'UTILITY • , 5 Ik I tA1EMO/t I II•1'' 1 f\ a1 p '1-1 '1-ta• , Lo' *NIL wAoI 1 II.I '.70 �f`\\ s—+�`'_ • "� I LA4MENt I 10 r-• 1� I \ ,► i I I ili I \ • 0 Ii�il ~'�,� � ''�� 8 1° 1 _ i I II. \ s'a •A Ir I I I Q rl ' Ll 1 ,a3°" L to'uTlutr a r1►it III rcii�Aa7dcwr • IL L >ia uu11ENr-_r 1 r' I I �•Atma�a\ lil ti . O ICI I \ 1 I I • • • t1 _ ' f'ai EA 44ENNT^ I'I 1il..i.I I ‘ '..` \, • -I 1'-` iALIT, LALEMLNT$ 1 �L rl • a�I.I q I_ I •t •�',I�' \ •\ 01 , 11y4p ! �� . •�'II ,24,1 � I I ( 1 70•LA1\ROAO i(MLNT I I 1 F • BI i���` P -- - - • III; I'• —4--``• .1---�_111L.•�. _ T,><» �,IIO. ,Ir� �:.'UTILITY\L�SEaQNt —• T „ os 11 1 • D'unuTr a wilt i " T' I. j $• • , .:, 1 .1.... ----1QA t .II ,I� 7 , ti t• y,:�IRADIUS, .go' ,,,.., • . imeoaurf s1c 1 I 1 S,,s•IS"OD't 00.00 \ 1 14 . I .4I! • 1 III,. : 1• czarms.s, ¢- 1 :a'''' 11' 6 y' • futr LAstMEpts +� �• • •v arw�u;:a 0.4...,Ny 10 orb 1� I I 'r•`i--• -- '_ ROAD EAS E �" 't'' II t `•� _1 - en PCI I ii . $ •...," 1\l'ailirima v i 'fir•4, 4% . 1� . .4.... >K / _ I 2 ND SUPPLEMcN;AL T ! 1- 1..... , �''•.MAPS-RENTON SI�ORELAN ET 2 OF 5 • 7-4'.7-8,•-=,-,..':'-.1•10:7......2.r_.•,..:••••••;.-.,i,:,2_,;::.•....---,:•,..".;,:-7,,...•-•-_,....:.-2-!..f..,!--...?..,...••;....--...`;;..••,..'•-•-,•,-,,'--...-:'7'--',:`,1-•......:,-/--.'''!•=1"!:.'•--•,,-;:,":":-, .-•--."-..:•'!...--,":":-..-0".:.......... .. .8.7. •-..-74:4...•..••71-..•..... •.•...,-.- ...„_,...__-..;--•.-8.-4-4.- . ,••':',....'‘••••....a....../....tv-7-•-...•'•-•-•89- ''':.s-..-.7.8 7..T'''.••--",•-'4••••.'' •,..•-•••••-,...,""/‘-'-'-'.---77--••••:•••4-:.--....-.......-:,I..7-..7,-.A-..4..--.-,8...-..v..........-...-7..8,•,;.';.;t.:7 8.."'f••'`:.7.'474,,- ''''•-4,4‘..t..7..,........7,7...--.--4----•.'.- . .. . .. - 8 • - _ . , , _ . / . . A • . . • . . _, . - • , JO-,•2---'.---:'-77---,- .. • -.r - • • . __ - . ••.. - • . . __ _ ___ . . .„4,..-i:- go. .‘ .. _ •:11.,. . --,•., .. ''‘,...,1*,..,„ ._ _ . • . 1.-A..., ",, s veal.•--• • - - - -• - • . ,-,.....:.I OR; A '',.,• -.: tin Z.-= i . 1 ! ,• -;,, t I I 1 IC 110 1 . - - •' ' -...., 4.1 -, , 1 ,„ + .. ,0,-,li - = ... , - _ %iel) • ...--,-.-.-- ,,,-40er--- -.--A .- ..- e 4,- 'NY• s-',- . _ '''''''-C- "‘‘i. •••• .., • . " ' ' - • ,...-ts . - ..... • .4 \ --,. - e'lit-all" ---- ..:-1-4.-. 11111, " . . 8.•%• ' S ••••tp -.0.•":14., .t 4°11L117r4., .. t•:: '' .,.:i.,.3___ ,.... 4.. .,.5.' Fir_ ,,,,art, it ,,;.. ,..., ..„....,t,.... ._. . _ __ / . . .. . . • ...,..-: ,.. . . !'..r,,,i.i _ • . . _a„,A.•• 7. 8.... -se/ •. °.- .:„..C.;C- ‘,..i.t.414' , .s_.1 r"..,/:._4011. ...If,7:::_.... ...,.........7., :1......a.%.,,....; _.tri. ,.;_:',,1-.1:g..,..., j., fli.....,,..:,..v.......-4.....,,,....c..,.-...-.;-45511"• ;.....,..,A '--,,,":' '- SITE ...„..5.,;7____ __.....,...,...\4,4.7„., :....,..itr...r ........ . .. _. ...„_..,..4., ..„.. ..,.... .., ., .„,.....,,,,, >7 -,,..•., . . I', ,•iff,..1.zz..,...,.. _.-'1 : *ST 1.- win.. t.,... ..e - le• . '-' -,--x--4-1,-- -7.:r'1'..-je1/4:.7::,.,`.4.silea*-46 --I' ' 1111 -- • .1 ,...: _.),:" .....:_, k...di, •86.•#, --.•'•-•1.:...WV.--.''• -''..:.,-7.-' • •"'-.84/.....9.44.•.4.;14/./VI ` ,1 . % 71.' p. -- - ' --- eo '-`*-14 • s' -e"-- :gr.----- - , . .......-.4„---7.i.„,:el, -,„m.:----41- = - - . •^4/:.,?':nil' ' -*.! v im- .."- '' . • . . - , • .,. ,. ...s ._ .. ....-E- „....„., ._ ..„.... ...). _:"..„ in: . _ .„ .,, ,„.. .,.,, , 0 v.--- • • - -- ,..........., .,... .,-,-..,..s._ ...... . ... .. --1-..- ---.. ''''.q.;*--... 1.V1-'.-.•-;:;:te--.:•••Criirialog,P;'...;', ---..----t4- -'4144 . -: ,-. -•,."-•:-- - ;- .-. . . • ,It"-..1.cig ,:_-_-7.74. ..„ 1.,..:,--Ittz. ,-`4,••• ...,_...,..0.... -., _---...--,,- ,--- ..-,- -IDS,. -- --klat*,-,-.,-...-,_ - ' 4.,•••••. . _ - --' ./....'t: --12,- -.75•41.--"' --.."-V-------e.,•--...Vt•;4",.. - :,-" ZIF-•-..,' ...:51A'%, '',--'-'-r..•! .'..,-".---,-• • ' „-m.... "%1 " ; .'",. •4. .----• - :---.,3- ,7„. , - - ..• '0 _.„, in .. ... ; . ._ .. . ... . ,.,,.,...„,.. „......„:. .. ....„...,,.., . .. . ,,. ....„ „ ..--,..„_„.....,.., - „......„,._._..,......, . ... . _., r ,.,-,t-z-e' • ' = - r :. -4. ' .... .. .-.. ir'...V.4..'f.:7.0Z-t..7;84: ‘.'.3.-Vfti'L-1. : 1"-.7: -.'f-Olit•-•-.-5?.'- : '•:<-:*•••••.•••..e.s.,•-•••••••.-:--' -.... - -, -..r'....,7",f•-,.-•,---•. . ..•.... 1 ' '^ 1...- ',` •':•!: ii -, - •fib -.v.:4.... • '."•r.•...,. ''• ..,••• ••7,-...0,..P,-----4.---- .*'.1-..,:if ".4: -- •--. --;:: - -- ••- .Am!•-••••. ••-•C ...k.7.."..„...- .-, •••••, ;:ii-,... ....... c.......... ..411111,-.:;'4:' .1--- ...,....... ..•- t:tt•-:- - -•-,-',----- -- ...--.-- :...011; • ••." - ..isiF... . .e•........,... --- ..,4.7'1.4.1 •••4 _• . ,4 8, • .-.17,. .. ..,, OP ' . ' - - .7:' .;•14•1.2.1./1"' i lei.,-E--•,.:1.-.7.-••‘••• : .. ........Z../- .:.••• ........ -••• ... . .4....:k.:•,_,.. .. %i. tia•'•-.'n. ....r..•-•47.4TrtS8•417,••••'.•...:`,. ...... 8784:a.7. „,.. c•-•-• •1 ' ••• •••4.:38..•„..- • .- . ..". ...ma saw. ....•••--;:. •'- - f. -.' . -- ••• . • - . 2ii-•. . , . . . ...........„_-..-.,,...?..-..,.,.":-.---3.',•rf-.-f•----.•. .;„.4..",........6.,. ,••.r,4..-...,,--,4-...•-,‘:,-,,.:•.•:::-;#.---.--•-!-,=.-..:L--_.-=-Ai......4`.:.3..3 tI-,i..1.- ...0•--„..-e;-,:.•:;--,.-J---:--•e-,--.-.--.--=--;%-;,:.^:-1..:..-.".4._...-.:.'.1,-.1.---.„..b-:1..:,,::.c-.-1.'• _-:.---'_.t--..-.,-.7--...:•,,--:..,•.-i-. '.•- --,-O.:.-2'.-4''37:Z.'4-1.-1:-1„9,,•37-,r7",,,.•,..7-.,--.-4l.•:•-:•a3i-:I.-.-.•k:.--.-'.7 t.,-;_,....•.?._.1--.:-.'..,.-..-.L,.--.,,...'..1..."-- 4370-g 1i-ik.t!•,1.•6 e.•1l17•,r-y,,''•.(•t,..•l•"A-4:'.-"--•.i.•':.'f'.'•,.t1.....-.l,S-.;•,:,1-7l-7,.iV.- :/I,11:i.t.,.;.-.r..-ii„.-',.r-.r,?,•••32.i--:•.%4:.1:.i•,..:..;:1.".:'...=•-4s:'4 2-,-.'"1,.'•('•6• •',"f. -,.,,"-1..• ,'..rE;„"'A Y-..-i.,..•''‘.-4,. ,..‘.,'7„64-,'*'si.•.,•.,4 i :!" -81:.1‘-.„r1•:',;.:•i'.t 1t I'1I1I I:r"2 .-:-'a-,.1,1,41..-',.'.-:.-.,.,.•t•'"•*-'1..%4.-.- :'3.--',.'.4%7..7•l..,7 i:."aI.r..-8•..i•8..•S.•.7_••:=.8.7.3:7_4.",-4-"..-.-;:4-,...-•.:-4-7•--.•..:.,‘--•3,•----•.'z.'1...--.„...:..4..;"•-i•.•*.,•,6. _- ,.•.• ._.- 4..E4....._.,4_ .1, 1:1II1. 7th ..,- ,• ' ' ..,;":4U sit1 .0711..6 li. .. •'...,';- ,.• . .. ' --A .. ..........L.,,_. ._"-..-:-...71,••• .. -. - •• • - . .- ---"."' - '---...".".••••••••• "...' . ••• .7.... . / . •,,, ,, , • • I , --• ..... .• 1.-:. -- ib' '''' ,iffr• . 4 I., .,..:„.....4 •-:. . • ---,.......;.. • , / - --.- •.., .ki %_ . • . .. ___...,„„,,,.. . :.-,. - - -,.. ---ti....:-.••••;-4-.:. --,z...- .--, • i - ri , -,..: ......,..,„*....,.....„.„, ...,.... ..,. "I • _ 1. ; , • . '..'.:1,71....----i- ''V.t....;*.".41101-.;el. ,-.L6.•: Isi,•. . . I • • 1 .....';,...t... • sr.*, •0,' -• 4'o r _, . • ..,...,•,....•..._ ,..„• ,t, • ' :...., •, n, • _..- -• • TA--"•,- ' -AI- ''`• .2:4.4' ••••=.1.•:..%...,_, _ . I-1 . Powell Ave. • . . - --. I • . :-.).--'!..:-... z• .•; _. - -- ___. - .. „:_, ':"...17„,-- :.,.t. ...,„„„,,,,,..„:_ 4 -..., --• ; : ;. - .--- , .., •,.• •'3 . - .-3. , -:.-•- --• - , . Plan -,..„... ,...„-, 1 lk• Z.? 4,1. - • .i : ...4 L . ' ' 1 • •C . . Conceptual Master, Pi ;:-."....L._ .-i.._. . ii. -...'" • ..,7 •i•-, - . --• ,',' -•• ••;„: • I 1-::::.--V.-12. V.:. sag .-43,4e ;:4 ____ _- • • .=. - .91 a 4 •'' 1 . ' 7., 'a."- •.; ' . • .• • /".•./% • 71„ • - • , 9 . :. 91474 '''•-.' - . ........4." - .7: -Z•-...- . 11: 141:j. '7•.' -.94.47 1'7; ---..-'• 4 " '% ,.3: - _. _ . . ....., ---1 ..... BlackP.iver -.,...- . fz i. .i .L....tEr- --41:02 , --- _- . • . Corporate Park :-..-- _, ....„. ...„..., ;-:ri- . , ...... • ..... ...k.,... .... • . . - - • -, ---- i - 1 ' . T , ...'" . 1 . -.7.i• ':'' ‘ ••• :.•:. ••-•••• • •-• ..; . . • . • . \. - • l',.-'4 'ii..7 i • VALLEY. 405 - • • , , : , -,_ .....-.... 1 \ _ tik. _ .. 1•• •••....... -is t ., 0 J •. -: - o 1 , t. ,,, . Li i .1:7:1 • .. ',..-.4 t) - .. C-(1 ___ / V --711/4--- i -.. .__, I... ..„.. ,. :._.-• __...--- - - , .-.----- RENTON, WASHINGTON .. - . I-77-1 . -- ______., ; ,-1• k . „... -.7, c-'• ..,..,4-, . ... ., .a , , .. ....7, ....i-:: • . 1 .....i • •....• , , ._.j 1 . la ; •, ; ie... .., • , .„..._,..... --,--r- -: r,./ ..4 LI f I ' ' 1 er,... • ,... ... ----P.:: -- , ...., a 5.,..., ,ss 4 .....__ ......_..... --P---- y- , ) : .. 7 - - 3-33 - - • ..0.1In t,.. 1 01 . FRST C:ITY mums 1 - - '1St- ‘1:: ."..`k.‘..; _.,_.;,- • . -____,_ . • ._-_...... - 1 '4.---,-; -...-ta .•.: . ----..:-1L----'•- • = , - _ -,. ‘ • ^.-.... - • Qi.......... cj 1 . LEASON POoF.Roy olOOrAWEST VI'. • 7,-Q. ,‘,..• ' - • --.-" --,t"-,•._. 33%-.7 X ..r." . ._............ : 1.tr• l'.1;"-; ........... • s ..... . ..... • .3:-!...;t..oo.r.f.-,•,:-..z... II•Ir...--F. ,_ - "' -.. • .- '. ! . '-';.1..-- Grady Way CITY OF RENTON LITTCXELL NELSON GPOYZ. :T.:. AN-,, -::•-z...... . ,,--"..' L "a-•• --- --- C'il '\/' - - . • .. (I : .'• '41-: =• , v ....n\ ECEOVE '‘ .... -- - •-•.'.-Z • • • • • - • • ..:. . •• . . . - • :•-•?.; 3 - . JUii 27 1986 .. .\.. ... - • - .._., . . .i. 5 . . • - .-I -.--....e. . • . - .- . . ,..-. • as• " • ... . -".i . . • . . . • . . =.. ... _ ..-.r.-A • . . . . . --•-* - - - - ;* -- - - - - 1 : • ..• •-••• _ , • • . • • -- - . _ • ••••••f ' • • ••• . ... .... .• ... ... --. . • . • . . " I .P. . co... •'. .. BUILDING/ZONING1 . .'. . DEPT. ,Architecture and Planning • Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc„ Royce A. Berg,A.I,A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 December 8, 1987 i '7 vl d lr 7i) s i DEC 1 I i Mr. Don Erickson,, AICP Jo, Zoning Administrator and Environmental Review Committee j i City of Renton — 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park Phases IV and V Files SA-090-87 &-SM-013-87 Original Submitted October 13, 1987 ERC letter November 30, 1987 Dear Mr. Erickson: The following comments are submitted per your letter of November 30, 1987 as additional information to be included with the ERC Committee's final recommendation to the Hearing Examiner and City Council. We appreciate your comments and in keeping with the phases already established we believe Phases IV and V will also result in the higher quality we seek for the Blackriver Corporate Park development. 1 . Water Quality/Wetlands: Water drainage for these sites will flow to Oakesdale north to 7th, east to Naches, and north to the swale for biofiltering before entering into the P-1 Channel, Per City of Renton direction and per original EIS for property and per storm lines installed in Oakesdale LID by FCE and Renton for this specific purpose. This system has been reviewed in context with the overall development and the existing biofiltering swale off Naches is adequate to accommodate these sites and other areas of the total development. A specific analysis is attached to this letter with a report by the project environmental engineer, David Morency of Entranco Engineers. Oil/water separators will be installed per City standards. (See attached report) 2. Glare: All glass reflects at certain angles of incidence. Bumpers on cars, windshields on cars, also reflect light at times when hit in certain manners. The use of "reflective glass" evolved from the energy crisis this nation entered and provides an efficient means to control heat gain in buildings, which is the dominant use of energy in office buildings (even in the northwest). Phase II on Powell Avenue of this development currently exists with reflective glass elements on three stories of the buildings, 45% outward reflectance) as do other buildings in the City of Renton with no adverse impacts on the adjacent "micro climate". Mr. Don Erickson Page Two December 8, 1987 There is no inclined reflective glass on this building, all glass is vertical and all reflective glass will be kept at or below the 23% outward reflectance which is the middle of the range. Reflective glass besides having energy efficient aspects also allows a building to change colors and tones depending on the weather and time of day which provides aesthetic value and interest to the building. Reflective glass will not be used at the major entry points to the buildings, tinted vision glass will be used. 3. Recreation: Benches and outdoor seating. The drawings did not reflect amenity areas; the intent was as follows: Phase Four, Bldgs. A & B, 3 Story Office - Two benches and paved sitting areas at each major entry of each building. Two benches and a paved sitting area to be provided at the southeast corner of this phase in the extra landscape area. In addition, raised planter walls will provide seating at the main entry at side. Phase Five, Bldgs. C & D - Two benches and a paved sitting area will be provided at the main plaza between the buildings. Two benches and a paved sitting area will be located in the landscape area along the trees at Oakesdale Avenue. Recreational activities like jogging will connect within the master plan when all master plan issues are resolved. A master plan concept for these areas was submitted over a year ago to the City but could not be processed by the City. These items will be developed per phase of development. The jogging trail for this phase is under construction west of Oakesdale and paid for by First City Equities in the LID. These trails ultimately will connect to Blackriver Corporate Park trails and should connect with City trails and other trails to Fort Dent Recreational Park which is within a mile of this phase of development. 4. Retention of Existing Trees As many of the existing trees as possible were saved through our site planning process and were reviewed by which areas of preservation would provide a balance of significant trees to soften the edges of development along the public streetscape and the property boundary lines. In addition 13 small trees will be relocated along the property lines to provide additional mature landscaping. 72% of the existing trees are retained or relocated. In addition, special effort was made by First City Equities to preserve large trees and adjacent trees in the Soils Conservation fill-setback area (200 ft. into property) when the City of Renton finished excavating the P-1 Channel. No require- ments were placed on the City to preserve these trees. In addition new Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 of ' Mr. Don Erickson Page Three. December 8, 1987 trees and plantings are to be installed in the landscape areas which will dramatically increase the number of trees on the site. The following is a tabulation of saved trees. Existing Trees Phase IV Phase V (clusters count as one tree) Preserved: 11 9 (4 are clusters) (6 are clusters) Relocated: 13 0 Removed: 9 3 • .. (+ 1 row of deciduous) = 4 % Preserved or Relocated ±73% ±69% Overall Average = ±72% preserved or relocated Per Existing Tree Survey: 46 trees shown (dense hedgerow of smaller deciduous trees running east and west counted as 1 tree) Landscape Open Space: Phase IV 25% Provided Phase V 28% Provided Required 20% It should be noted that Cottonwood trees are messy trees and contaminate the screens of heating and air conditioning units as well as clogging roof drains when left too close to buildings. They also clog catch basins in the streets and parking lots. This is one of the reasons the City of Renton would not allow street trees in the medians when Oakesdale was designed. The roots are close to the surface and ultimately raise paving and invade water, sewer and storm lines. We have complied with recommended mitigation measures and have saved as many trees as possible in areas we feel benefit the development and community the best. There are no requirements which mandate preservation of all trees except FCE preservation areas for the Riparian Forest one half mile to the north of this property and not part of this submittal. We have exceeded the minimum landscape requirement of 20% to 25% at Phase IV, Buildings A and B; and 28% at Phase V, Buildings C and D in order to preserve this amount of trees. Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A,I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 Mr. Don Erickson Page Four December 8, 1987 5. Access Access to these sites (ingress and egress) are dictated by previous comments in public hearings by the Fire Marshall of the City of Renton, and the Oakesdale LID. Development of Phases I and II provided access points to this phase for emergency vehicle access to Oakesdale from Powell Avenue. The major east—west access aisles reflect this and dictate basic on site circulation. Access to Oakesdale was limited to the access points shown. We have added one additional curb cut for right in and right out for Buildings A and B. This curb cut aligned further north originally (and can still be an alternate approach, per attached sketch reflecting major on site vehicular lanes) but shifted to the south to avoid relocating a fire hydrant. On site circulation allows north—south access between sites but does not encourage high speed direct lanes (which are not desirable on site). Pedestrian access has been provided between buildings, from buildings to the sidewalks on the street and a major east—west access walk was provided to the adjacent properties and phases into Oakesdale. We see no need for additional walks and prefer to keep as much area in pervious surface and landscaping as possible and maintain rights to develop this property per marketing and allowed use per zoning. Parking amounts meet City code requirements of 1/200 SF of building and provide a reasonable balance of allocation to each building yet providing different exposures for buildings. Respectfully, LPN ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS , te,Ro, ce A. Berg P esident RAB:cpm Enclosures: Ltr. Entranco Engineers Ltr. LPN Architects, October 27, 1987 Ltr. LPN Architects, November 3, 1987 LPN site plan reduction reflecting alternate access point to site cc: Barbara Moss, First City Equities Ron Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Director Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Schuman, First City Equities Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 „, ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC. LAKE WASHINGTON PARK BUILDING (206)827-1300 December 10, 1987 5808 LAKE WASHINGTON BOULEVARD N.E., KIRKLAND,WA 98033 Barbara Moss, Director of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: Phase 4 and 5 Development, Area 2 Treatment of Stormwater Runoff Black River Corporate Park Entranco Project No. 87116-60 Dear Barbara: The purpose of this correspondence is to provide an evaluation of the probable water quality treatment effectiveness of the present storm drainage plan for the Black River Corporate Park (refer to the recently revised plan dated 12/10/87, enclosed) . The new plan would involve the construction of approximately 4,100 feet of drainage swales or biofilters for the treatment of stormwater runoff. The value of these areas as wildlife habitat is also addressed in this letter. In order to simplify the discussion of these issues I have divided the site into five major drainage areas and have numbered them accordingly (refer to enclosed drainage plans). Please note that whenever I refer to the "EIS” in this discussion I am referring to the water quality appendices of the Earlington Park (1981) and Black River Office Park (1982) Final EISs where the original stormwater treatment concept was presented. In my opinion, effective stormwater treatment will be provided for all areas of the site except for Area 3 and some runoff from S.W. Oakesdale Avenue that will drain directly into Springbrook Creek and the P-1 Pond without treatment. The absence of stormwater treatment in Area 3 could be addressed by providing additional open swale (biofilter) drainage to replace underground storm drains. However, it should be noted that in the original EIS it was assumed that no treatment would be provided for this area. It was also assumed that the relatively small amount of untreated runoff from this area would not have any significant adverse impact on water quality in the P-1 Pond - in part due to the small volume of runoff compared to total flows in Springbrook Creek (i.e. , due to the benefit of dilution) , and in part because existing water quality in Springbrook Creek is already significantly degraded. The provision of approximately 2,100 feet of biofilter swale area for Area 1 runoff will represent a significant improvement in stormwater treatment compared to the original EIS drainage plan. In the original EIS it was assumed that runoff from this area would be treated in the old Black River Channel wetlands along with other site runoff. EVERETT OFFICE:516 SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING (206)258-6202 1602 HEWITT AVENUE,EVERETT,WA 98201 Ms. Barbara Moss December 10, 1987 Page 2 Assuming that the width of the biofilter swale will vary from 20 to 40 feet, the total amount of new treatment area will be about 1 to 2 acres. On the basis of design criteria employed in the original EIS, this amount of wetland area should be more than sufficient to remove pollutant fractions associated with particles of 43 microns or greater. This means that pollutant removal rates should be in the range of 60 to 90 percent for most pollutants (refer to Tables 1 and 2) . [It should be noted that a basic premise of the design approach is to provide sufficient sedimentation (treatment) area to treat the 1- to 2-year design storm and that storms of greater magnitude and lower return frequency (e.g., once in 5 or more years) would receive lower treatment.] The location of these biofilter swales will be along the margin of the riparian forest preserve, as shown in the enclosed drainage plan. This location will promote groundwater recharge of stormwater runoff and will also make it possible to divert overflow runoff into the riparian forest area. Groundwater recharge and surface water diversion through the riparian forest should assist in preserving the forest habitat and may even result in the creation of a more definitive wetland habitat. However, care should be taken in the design of drainage facilities in this area so that overflow runoff is routed into and through the riparian forest in such a manner as to avoid channelization of flow and creation of erosion and sedimentation problems in the P-1 pond. Drainage control in Area 2 has been affected by loss of old Black River Channel wetlands, as previously mentioned. One out of the three original acres of wetland was lost during construction of the P-1 Pond, and another acre will be filled by First City Equities in conjunction with construction of buildings and parking areas. The latter filling by First City Equities will occur in a manner consistent with the plan that was approved in the original EIS. Although this loss of wetland area will result in some reduction in treatment efficiency, the remaining wetland area is still sufficient to provide an adequate degree of stormwater treatment. On the basis of the original EIS stormwater treatment criteria, I have determined that adequate treatment area is available to remove the 40-micron particle size and larger, providing 60 to 90 percent pollutant removal efficiencies for most pollutants. Again, I refer you to Tables 1 and 2 as the basis for these criteria. This analysis included treatment of off-site runoff that is conveyed to the old Black River Channel via the existing 60-inch storm drain. On the basis of Table 1 criteria, 145 square feet of sedimentation area is required per cfs of flow to remove particle fractions of the 40-micron size and greater. For the 110 cfs flow originally calculated in the EIS, this computes to approximately 16,000 square feet. On the basis of these criteria, the one acre (43,560 square feet) of remaining wetlands should provide adequate stormwater treatment. In order for treatment to be provided effectively, however, I recommend Ms. Barbara Moss December 10, 1987 Page 3 that a gabion-type structure be located at the outlet of the old Black River Channel where it discharges into the P-1 Pond. This will have the effect of creating standing water conditions behind (upstream of) the gabion and increasing the surface area and effectiveness of wetland treatment contact. Other factors tending to enhance treatment in the remaining wetland area include: (1) a reduction in the total volume of runoff that will be treated in this area (a significant volume of runoff will be treated within Area 1 and will not be routed to the old Black River Channel wetlands as originally planned); and (2) additional treatment area (1,500 feet x 20 feet) that will be provided in the form of new biofilter drainage swales located east of Nachess Avenue S.W. (about 750 feet of this swale has already been constructed) . Stormwater runoff from Areas 4 and 5 will also discharge to biofilter swales and will receive adequate treatment. In summary, I find that the presently proposed storm drainage plan will actually result in enhanced treatment of stormwater runoff from the Black River Corporate Park as compared to the plan originally proposed in the EIS. Adequate treatment will also be provided for off-site runoff, and I do not anticipate any significant increases in pollutant concentrations in Springbrook Creek or the P-1 Pond as a result of development of the site as proposed. Sincerely, ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC. 44444 ,;( Ay/. A)10(p_ David A. Morency Associate DAM:gg Enclosures Entranco Engineers, Inc. December 10, 1987 TABLE 1 Minimum Sediment Basin Area Requirements for Selected Particles (per cfs Outflow Rate) Particle Minimum Area Kind of Diameter Required Material (micron) (sq. ft.) Coarse sand 1,000 3.0 Coarse sand 200 14.5 Fine sand 100 38.2 Fine sand 60 80.0 Fine sand 40 145.0 Silt 10 2,030.0 Coarse clay 1 203,000.0 Fine clay 0.1 20,300,000.0 Source: American Public Works Association, 1974. Practices in Detention of Urban Stormwater Runoff. Special Report No. 43. Entranco Engineers, Inc. December 10, 1987 TABLE 2 Fraction of Pollutant Associated with each Particle Size Range (Percent by Weight) PARTICLE SIZE (u) 2,000 840 -> 2,000 246 -> 840 104 -> 246 43 -> 104 <43. Total Solids 24.4 7.6 24.6 27.8 9.7 5.9 Volatile Solids 11.0 17.4 12.0 16.1 17.9 25.6 BOD5 7.4 20.1 15.7 15.2 17.3 24.3 COD 2.4 4.5 13.0 12.4 45.0 22.7 Kjeldahl Nitrogen 9.9 11.6 20.0 20.2 19.6 18.7 Nitrates 8.6 6.5 7.9 16.7 28.4 31.9 Phosphates 0 0.9 6.9 6.4 29.6 56.2 Total Heavy Metals 16.3 17.5 14.9 23.5 27.8 Total Pesticides 0 16.0 26.5 25.8 31.7 Source: U.S. EPA, 1972. Water Pollution Aspects of Street Surface EPA- Contaminants, EPA-R2-72-081. • RAILROAD TRACKS t. * BcKRIRCOOTEPAN\ • ,• 1 (BLAC- RIVER OFFICE PARK) ,,• •`'P`p ,r Ill f p••p . ill II �,o„ ""'1`r,i/ °'o, BIOFILTER SWALE (TYP.) /, rrrrry SI PUBLIC NATURAL •,•�• ♦..� \4 ,i,�,, C r4. ilI_ 0 prrAREA EASEMENT��p► :/ I p,,\ • r 0 ,.st_?-- 0 ...:. •. (—PUYP STATION P—:;POND msrID,...OU , �t�;�... I% %.f., . 1�1..:..::`.7s.., `. ''Oq� _ ` r .•• '1 'BLACKRIVER CORD►RATE PARK' al rut.,''a —— \ �� / (VALLEY 405 BUSIN..S PARK) 'shprrr 'sr,, 0. , 3 l : , yl L`tour r -C ,I SW 7TH ti �� ..i /FL0, _ (TYP.)cc DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY (TYP.) z . l'%\S:4:, ,p. -1_____Ht . i STORM DRAINAGE O BLACKRICorporatepVERrk Si. W JOT"' RENTON,WASKINOTON \ '� �. ` B l a %. 5_ N. , , . , ;goo % p�OY NORTHD. s�p 12-10-87 VICINITY MAP T lti /�,1 j LEGAL DESORPTION TABULATION �pdg A&El , _BLDGS C&D — — 1 • 1 an••� PHASE IV PHASE V '''', -- -—— L \Q 0 1 II—I I ] ' V' r 1 �"""'" Site Area 1403,084 S.F. * :194,477 S.F. l�JL ' " 1 Building Area *148,000 S.F. 2 50,350 S.F. 'J �•'; 5'� �� ji i sea o slam mem sum...UM OP Canna.Mal OOTNOIT.op Building Footprint : 47,000 S.F. 2 '50,350 S.F. CEI `� �. Ma �w:aYiw�!!G.. . . ; v....�...., .. ..«. Site Coverage :11.7% *25.9% I �' a Gross Coverage x38.7% 45.9% Id I • PHASE l "' j _�,n ,t, ,�LL„M,.,.PLOP OW NM. •r Parking 2t • 1477 Stabs 2Ua Stabs X � /•I _ 2107 Slaty (SOS) 2 SS Stall (24%) CO '.. • "' (. ± 10 Stabs : 4 Stabs `-r 1 t .'�'W,�•"' -r c Handicapped 25 Stabs (1/200 SF. - ,,. .a+eu , y.'4w-r"" - y z� J d d r ror�u saw st,N(vaoo aF. xz a. 0aaahNTa7• ,.r"``A,o o':., "401"." ` ,�°' '°�' C...- �..a _ _ - t Y�,-.a:__ •. - - .•�•�� \I 7 ) 0 - at 95.5%EMem,1eyl at 89.8S EMeaney) .4,_------ 1 'ice _ ' Igor u: H UAW` n O ✓ 47 \., .0(••-•, ,#,„ ;p GY • om____._____..� --..— 1*1 Eal51.1 Phase I -for m,•+...ao L Existing Phew 4-,! �! y c r' CO Existing I �4 Mi 1 i i i 1 . J l i �I 4HW' 1` L '7....y ''.e.0011 E Lrr__I'l . ..... - 0.._ , 'R ,,l j;c. l a• 'Tr .r IA i Ai r ; ' a4'amu.,a0 r ; / .r r��,.r. �- I d.u.r zwv.rr. - i. a O I �l -� -".. .n:..(i.T+.....-�-,• " F ,2c � ..,, �I•—W4%•...8,+ , ly / ii'R"a. . is - -� iK- �a k—k.rcp.,. 0r Existing s.+drro ��+ '>' k C - �. p _ weal-- m.,oi•�OJalc • 47 QS. Existing 8 1 I•. ; . ', _ `N:7 V w-r. 1 staa7 R a o i t a iRid' 4 1 Balding I+ - •� .. C 2aa7a0 aP. ' L k 1 B `` 1 Fs.ns' 1' 7i.trr1 'ir ! c VL 'd . : + ` a o j I 274020 a•.` .� es 1 t 1 a. {✓� 't r� I FY.tar 4.-•---. �_ t.a.....ri J.•_:._.°. Z o w f: o smr+r i..:41` ,aJ'o• t ' t 711 .ja- Ii sf ^ . - , ,it : `ru. ..OS Q.�. w Y'4'..c•.e.Ts.•,.�c•.i,lr t �R a➢wet • - 4 •*.' '1 V.I. ��J •a.' ,- w*p-'-• �4 1�W f1 G t s-- T _fig ll f1i.- .t. et a I s� i ft pi wr:.c we •" ► % ' ` ` Ipn (/ t Fy, 'G y. _ ar , !a riraso, _ 0 x.a• • 51. 10 orl - 1.•,rs `f / �I ". •^'tyi` '�: '( �i \ •..` �„s,n•T ``�� - CO rya-..a�ac...as . ( • S. :IF .` /,'O. ..'t .sy. s .+w`w.• 'l ` i{rWa'y • - �8!..��"" _.„, —i rr't'a+_ .. \ v l _�+ �r y ^l�y" V aeea-. ,..+..ccp n L.uo.m. tm. ' • le `, , ` •..,-., taw 1 u l zryap v..xr t▪ ♦ 4 • - i ." �t,����.�7- �` •�S Le7v�•...r,•14.,.e*fa wG.D. _- fl4'DaeGCiK /' r -''�.� �_j f airi»X.Frs•t NyDIfWr•tail)A LT . SYMBOLS \ ` •�"•••'�°• . �' rug. P-1 Channel • •atx.r,aa•r-s aav Sao I tarsi' �' lis �` ; ?,i, co+e+,rf., avx.'�TM•aS s°aa.retN'aTfO G0124 COT , . • __ 1 OL) ` RIVER S" P sass. EAR '' TQ gm utac q4 ur.a.avxr 1011.1b ill .dCT ' y. '( 1! a I `�-^ .1 • BLACKRIVER �,,,, il I • •"'� x� .= = t �� 3 CORPORATE PARK �� `• 1 RENTON -wASHNOTON s , ��. •i`7-••�• '— °'M` 1� =.4r T P, i I FIRST cm EQUITIES - •-t 'AMM °� PHASEp PLAN &V SfTE - Y"'•'• '1 ••� i I3 `• ears i} SITE SECTION A r-mr VICINITY YAP OF ADJACENT USES - - �. II .._.•.r_ 1 or 7 ' y -y,y � f ''t`.t. !I':t 4 q4, i# +� 5 :�A y a'�+ = rck t .., S , ' lkf+xli rf�f4g dYtr r a2f 7 ,�sl w �,z a 1 { 4 \�YtY .F ;At' Y� lyY 1drR�,.r: ,r ,:k & ,ram �" �, � e �;er .s + • ,t44!tV' ' SAttrilreCfi)fe dna i5,1a9 itig:Ty.„ x N� y y Leeson pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,t3byce A.Berg,A,I.A.. 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle.WA 98101 (206)583.8030 November 3, 1987 ENA COURIERS Mr. Jerry Lind Planning Department City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Phase IV and Phase V — Drainage Site Approval Submittal — SA-090-87 Environmental Checklist — ECF-078-87 Shoreline Permit — SM-018-87 Dear Jerry: Per your conversation with Barbara Moss regarding the conflict in the Environmental Checklist and drainage drawing, the checklist is correct. All drainage for the Phases IV and V sites will go north — into Oakesdale, 7th, and Naches respectively and biofiltered in an open swale before entering the P-1 Pond. Attached is a revised print reflecting the grading and a revised reduction of the grading for your use. Respectfully, Ro a A. Berg P sident RAB:cpm Enclosure . . cc: Barbara Moss Mark Miller David Schunian Ken Chin Architecture art Ptdhnin� , t X . Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc..Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583.8030 • FIRST CITY EQUITIES October 27, 1987 OCT 2 8 1987 Mr. Jerry Lind Department of Building & Zoning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase IV and V Site Plan Review (No. SA-090-87), Landscape Requirements Dear Jerry: Pursuant to the Renton Building Regulations, Section 4-718(C)5,c, requiring a minimum of 20% of the site to be retained in landscaped open spaces, our current proposed landscaped open spaces are: 1. Phase IV: + 100,770 S.F. = 25% 2. Phase V: + 54,450 S.F. = 28% The above areas are exclusive of all proposed walks and paved areas, and exceed the 20% required areas. Final drawings will vary in amounts but will be. over 20%. . Please do not hesitate to call if there are any questions. 0 0 Si ncerel ' i Y. Ken K. Chin, AIA YKKC:cpm cc: Barbara Moss Mark Miller %? BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT November 18, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: First City Equities PROJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park - Phase IV & V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-078-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three- story buildings having 74,000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19, 000 sq. ft. , and substantial shoreline development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Ave. S.W. B. ISSUES: Whether the subject proposals have sufficiently mitigated adverse impacts related to water quality, glare, wetlands recharging, and flaura and fauna habitat? Whether developing Phase V with two one- story buildings is the highest and best use of the site, particularly in light of the fact that environmental issues on the Blackriver portion of the site may preclude the originally anticipated development potential from being reached? Whether sufficient measures have been taken, pursuant to the recommended miti- gation measures in the Final EIS for Earlington Park, to retain and protect "as many of the existing trees as possible through sensitive site planning" . Staff note that a number of mature Cottonwoods in the 24" to 30" range are proposed to be removed under the current site plan. C: ANALYSIS: Staff have reviewed the subject application and have serious concerns about the adequacy of the site planning o for these two phases of development. Circulation onto and off the two sites seems uncoordinated and confusing to the non-initiated. Medians on Oaksdale restrict southbound access to the site to one point near the north boundary of Phase V. Rather than having an access drive parallel to Oaksdale to facilitate circulation through the site, a number of circuitous routes are presented to the motorist. Northbound traffic has r/ ( Building and Zoning D--lrtment Environmental REview imittee Staff Report November 18, 1987 Page 2 more opportunities to access the site and should be less of a problem. The parking layout does seem discombobu- lated with the effect of making the individual buildings, particularly in Phase IV, stand alone. Although there are anticipated to be only 620 employees as a result of this development, more than 900 parking stalls are proposed on the site! This parking excess smoothers the site and precludes efforts to site buildings in a way that maximizes the retention of mature landscaping or allows for the provision of large common recreational areas for employees. No effort appears to have been taken to provide pedestrian linkages between buildings or even from the proposed buildings to more distant parking spaces. No passive recreational areas for employees are apparant on this 13 . 0 acre site even though it is anticipated to house at least 620 employees. Picnic tables and benches are not indicated and lawned areas appear to be visual rather than usable open space. Although more than 900 parking spaces are proposed and an estimated 85 percent of the two sites will be impervious surfaces, the applicant has not provided any detailed information on the bio- filtering capacity of the drainage swales they are proposing to use to - treat this surface water runoff. Although there is a new east/west drainage ditch to the north, north of S.W. 7th Street, that leads into the P-1 detention pond/forebay. Because of the the amount of surface water runoff being directect to this rather narrow and short drainage ditch, Staff have concerns about its treatment capacity for the amounts of water runoff proposed to be directed through it. There is a legitimate concern about oil and chemical residues adequately being treated before they are released into Springbrook Creek or the P-i Channel Forebay. Although, this has been discussed with the applicant before there is no new information to assist us in making a decision as to the adequacy of the proposed mitigation measures at this time. C: RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff are recommending that the Environmental Review Committee defer from making a threshold determination at this time unless it is a Determination of Significance. The applicant should be told that we have problems with their site plan in terms of vehicular ingress and egress, parking layout and amount,' pedestrian circulation, usable outdoor recreation space, on-site employee Building and Zoning D irtment Environmental REview imittee ' Staff Report November 18, 1987 Page 3 amenitiy space such as cafeterias, lunch and recreation rooms (all which help to reduce employee generated vehicular trips off site during the day) , drainage, and retention of mature landscaping as was required in the Final EIS for Earlington Park. Also, since approximately 45 feet of the site paralleling Oaksdale is within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program (Urban designation) , more infor- mation on how the uses and development within this area comply with the Shoreline Program must be provided. Staff also believe that we need to look at the parking requirements for this development. If the applicant can verify that only 3.1 employees per 1,000 sq. ft. is likely, than maybe our requirements of 5. 0 spaces per 1, 000 sq. ft. should be re-evaluated. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Fire Prevention Bureau: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. All fire and building codes and ordinances to be complied with. 2. All required Fire Department access roads to be in and approved by Fire Department prior to construction. 3. All fire hydrants required to be installed and approved prior to construction. 4. All primary hydrants required to be within 150 feet of a structure. All secondary hydrants to be within 300 feet of structure. 5. Preliminary fire flow calculations indicate that Buildings A and B require three (3) hydrants each. Building C requires (3) hydrants. Design Engineering: Traffic Engineering: Utility Engineering: Needs approved utility layout. Parks and Recreation: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. As presented at this juncture, the environmental issues outlined go beyond a conditional approval. If t. the project proponents could improve their project concept so that the conditions do not require redesign, but rather modification of a basically acceptable concept, then Building and Zoning D--=irtment Environmental REview , tmittee Staff Report November 18, 1987 Page 4 conditions could be reasonably suggested. 2. These proposed projects will have major recreation non-motorized circulation, and aesthetic impacts. a. The plan provides for no significant usable passive recreation open space. The need for this is underscored by the fact that on a nice summer day one can observe workers throwing frisbies in the congested parking lots of First Cities' Phase 1, 2, and 3 projects. If it was designed properly, one open space could not only service the passive recreation needs of all three buildings, but it could also function as a unifying element for th entire site. The open space unifying building C & D is a beginning, but it should be expanded. Further, because of this site's close proximity to the proposed Springbrook and Black River Trail systems, shower facilities should be included to accommodate those people who will make active use of those trails during their lunch hours. b. There is no significant pedestrian circulation system proposed. This is especially a problem between the buildings on the site. The proposed design allows parking and the misuse of landscaping to segregate and disjoint the site. No provisions have been made for bicycle parking even though sixteen bicycles can be accommodated by the average parking space required by a standard American automobile. c. The landscaping misses its potential to help create, a pedestrian and auto focal point for the site and instead serves more to break the site up, hide it or act as a barrier. The effect of this is not to be under estimated when the significance of Oakesdale Avenue as a major Renton new arterial is considered. d. The connecting road between this phase and the existing phases needs to include pedestrian facilities and be given a landscape treatment that helps unify the two sites. To experience all the shortcomings of the proposed plan, all one has to do is drive or walk through Phase I, II, III, and IV. Building Division: Building and Zoning D^„.-irtment Environmental REview imittee Staff Report November 18, 1987 Page 5 Zoning Division: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Relocate building No. "D" westward in order to save row of deciduous trees. 2. Relocate driveway onto Oakesdale Avenue in front of building No. "C" as it encroaches to closely to trees being saved. 3. On-site pedestrian oriented area should be encouraged to include picnic tables and seating areas. 4. Several large cottonwood trees (24"- 30") in the middle of the site are proposed to be removed by the developer. Per the final E'.I.S. of Earlington Park, retention of as many existing trees as possible should be done. 5. Some of the parking stalls in the site plan should be deleted in order to provide sufficient space for existing trees to be maintained in a quality environment. 6. Vehicular circulation and the' layout of the parking and perhaps buildings should be revised to reflect the above referenced concerns. • Policy Development: ti 1:1) . CITY OF RENTON MIL2 + )` '�, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director November 30, 1987 Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Status of Environmental Review of Phases IV and V, Files SA- 090-87, SM-013-87 Dear Ms. Moss: The Environmental Review Committee at their meetingon November 18, 1987, reviewed your application and concluded that there was insufficient information for them to make a determination. The Committee decided to defer their decision on the project until they receive the following information: 1. Water Quality/Wetlands Recharging The Committee after reviewing the information submitted for the application determined that they needed more information on the size and capacity of the proposed biofilters in order to determine whether this system will indeed be large enough to treat the stormwater generated by the office complex. In addition, the Committee would. like to know if the proposed biofilter system will serve only the properties south of S.W. 7th St. If not, is the capacity of the proposed system large enough do do an adequate job once the other sites to be served are developed. As with previous applications in this area of the City, the Committee is concerned that oil and chemical residues are adequately treated before they are released into the P-1 Channel forebay. 2 . Glare The Committee reviewed the information on light and glare impacts and wondered what information your staff had to support the statement that there will be no safety hazard or interference with views due to light and glare impacts (See lib of the checklist) . In particular they would like to know 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 i Barbara Moss Status of Phases IV & V November 30, 1987 Page 2 if all reflective surfaces are vertical and if there are any inclined glass surfaces. What impact will the amount of glare have on the micro climate? 3 . Recreation The Committee after reviewing the application and plans were concerned that provisions have • not been made for usable passive recreation area for the anticipated 620 employees of Phases IV and V. The plans do not show the location(s) of benches and picnic tables. The Committee would like to know what plans have been made for the passive recreational needs of employees. 4 . Retention of Existing Trees One of the mitigation measures recommended in the Earliington Final EIS was the reention and protection of "as many of the existing trees as possible through sensitibe site planning. " The Committee noted that a number of mature Cottonwoods in the 24" to 30" range are proposed to be removed under the current site plan. The Committee would like to see site plan options which would preserve more of the existing trees as suggested by the Earlington EIS. In addition to these concerns, the Committee will be reviewing the site plan for comments to the Hearing Examiner. Areas of concern thus far identified are ingress and egress from the site; parking layout and amount; and on-site pedestrian circulation. The Committee would like the above requested information as soon as possible in order for the City to continue processing your application. If you have any questions, please give me or Jeanette Samek-McKague a call at 235-2550. Sincerely, V Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building December 2, 1987 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Larry Springer, Policy Development Director; Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Jim Hanson, Assistant Building Director; Mike Parness, Mayor's Assistant; Jeanette Samek-McKague, Associate Planner; Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner; Carolyn Sundvall, Recording Secretary. 1. PENDING PROJECTS: DAVID WILLET ECF-077-87, SA-088-87 Application for site plan approval to allow an eight-unit apartment building. Property located at 354 Taylor Avenue N.W. Don Erickson stated he had not heard back from the applicant on the discrepancy on this project. Action will be deferred until the applicant responds. SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON (GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT) ECF-066-87 Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow the extension of an existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of the site. The work is to include 142,000 cubic yards of removal and 295,000 cubic yards of fill. Property located at 350 Monroe Avenue N.E. Don Erickson stated he was waiting for a return call from Greg Bishop, King County Health Department, on a contractual arrangement to see if the county would be willing to contract with the private sector and monitor the fill material. Project was deferred until King County responded. FIRSSCITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK PHASES IV & V) ECF- 078-{7) SA-090-87, SM-013-87 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of two three-story buildings having 74,000 sq. ft. each and for two one-story buildings having 30,750 sq. ft. and 19,000 sq. ft. and for substantial shorelines development permit to allow said development within 200 feet of P-1 channel. Property located south of S.W. 7th Street and east of Oakesdale Avenue S.W. DISCUSSION: Erickson had talked with David Shuman and Barbara Moss. A summary letter of the meeting, signed by Larry Springer and Ron Nelson, was sent to the Dept. of Ecology. Larry Springer had talked with Larry Warren regarding the meeting, Warren suggested acting on it as soon as the Committee heard from DOE. Lenora Blauman is reviewing tapes from Council and portions will be transcribed. 2. CONTINUED PROJECTS: ARCO AM/PM MINI MART ECF-056-87, CU-065-87 Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an AM/PM Mini Mart with gasoline sales. The project will include the construction of a 2,480 sq. ft. building with a 30' x 53' canopy with two split 32' pump islands for gasoline sales, with three 12,000 gallon double containment underground storage tanks. Site includes 13 parking stalls, landscaping and a free-standing sign. Property located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue Northeast. P5. 001 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: FIRST CITY EQUITIES (BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK—PHASES • IV & V) SA-090-87, ECF-078-87,SM-013-87 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO THREE— STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND FOR TWO ONE—STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SQUARE FEET AND 19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT OT ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200 FEET OF P-1. CHANNEL. GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1. BUILDING PERMIT 2. SITE PLAN APPROVAL 3. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director CERTIFICATION JERRY F. LIND HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON NOVEMBER 19 ,19 87 ,IN THREE (3) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in , on the c;Ott. day ofo \0\9,1 \� g� SIGNED: LAi___ —...._ .—�—«........ .....,_- _+.ww.rrrv.xa r, rc-y.+luc®V • w v n3Y.YL6'ilo.vvy.VS1a:F"• OF4. I AA Js p f• III' z''"'";?'1;"`;', •w.+�w. 5. r�.r..w �, e, . 4 'i r. U 88 two';' 2 P. , 2� a t' A�9q �Q�' "CO SEP1 �O 1011IF iENDF HG ,, d„,I It iti ,N i , I LI ,.. Ae S �' . 4 IT :, .. ,.. _ '4 1 ! '., , . _J, * Y t. .• f jj I ES . - i,. ,Irt' 1 I .'%r/� • J ® FIRST CITY EQUITIES(BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK- A, ' �1 ® PHASES IV & V) SA-090-87, SM-013-87 ' I 4 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO THREE—STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 74,000 SQUARE FEET EACH AND FOR TWO ONE—STORY BUILDINGS HAVING 30,750 SQUARE FEET AN 19,000 SQUARE FEET, AND FOR SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW SAID DEVELOPMENT WITHIN 200 FEET OF P-1 CHANNEL. �pp��p t(1� ;� �s p Z ' ,it4 I�,." !" �` "• is ' " '• rf , ENEi t A L. L S A, Ti '•* #;', ,r. l , ,' / �/ '.. A , :S,k' ', ESS o LOCATED SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. ,1 ; r,, Li ,;1hY` ,, rit `1' V' tIS E $ , l.� ilf ED :„II1.% M ` f. rr 'r t[ •,} 1. BUILDING PERMIT 2. SITE PLAN APPROVAL 3. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PW, LAC C c\ uMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE 1 UilL it iG z. Z $ NING DEPARTMENT ANYM E PR9 •i R Tt PUBLIC HEARINGS AND *URI . :G PUBLIC HEA INCS0 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OE RENTON BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NSTICE NOT T• BE REMOVED WITHOUT PR SPER AUTHORIZATION T �!/Syr _ , 1 ...p ,. „.„,),/,/, 4,„,,,,,,,,, 1"; , .,, . ,,0i, v 0 ;pit: \ — '• --.. •-° ,o's/, ,/,', / .i,e* 4., -woe/ 7.c d_ /!. '. - • „...., i . :. _., '',A-',,,„_ • . 7.4.011PIAI` iiiir.,44„,7-.v•-•,.,,d4r,r, \ je'''>..., • 1 NA • _ - _ sw y t ` J ) \y 1 l 1 . �J' ii I w i` �\\ ,\N\\':Viii(f: 4 1 1 mr.p ,_. _ - --t - -- -- ;. .. ,i ' „ > .. , I , Q • T R _L6 ____ _ :a' dzis •` TA• , 'I • 1 . _ _ _ +_ __ ___ \ ,- - � to_ .__,( _ t_z_v_tz____ .,„._ -11 ® S A L_ NO\ - .1 L ca,- -----,c- --bi— inoono 1 R- P ■,r' I ' I .'- �r0- Ill 11'! S II„ lI al,, . iii ,`., %,,Tel Ili I / %111I� l 11111W VI 1 cf Mear.====_::-.-7.',1) x 11 ' 1 - / S, lit - ` - , ' , / /./' ;=-‘, ,.' ,,- X-'.- .../'''-..... -- ' - .--- ; .., --.,... "''''11011.-1-1- Irti : '.' PL-....., : .... 1- I j i 1 I -- 516�,I �I�I�,I` mu I ��€.. ce-- - . 1111� BLACKRIVER OFFICE PARK - PHASES IV & V s`:, ,.,, ' SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87 ,,. t APPL I CANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES TOTAL AREA 13.7 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 7th STREET and OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING 0—P (OFFICE PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED (FORMER GOLF COURSE) PROPOSED USE FOUR OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 197750 SQUARE FEET. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION-OFFICE COMMENTS. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF OAKESDALE AVENUE S.W. AND SOUTH OF S.W. 7th STREET. , • '•L a r :dam ���y� 'y tuf�1 �,► � ) I�-- � tip '� , 61.60 CU l te <r, a� i7 It ir. ,, I ' — ,°411 el. . _60 14.....— 4. --if.. 4,-.-A7....i.%-'4.1",filii-Att'L'.1 0 �L Lr y(� o4ec y > > c ' ,..... \ ``j ;;"--�-"� �, — o m• ��P' i F + ..,.!!A, .�L W 3 !t' -so row:.t„ ' R :`��j . `{fig► �I Ito t1V.�_ -'q B �7 lQ➢'. . D, fi gi i LL m�¢° \ ` `�' �7_ t i' ` 1 • a✓' fi �w�'` ! r• 1\ Q � �. k.i # MIS 0 y:�`}1y1\11 t�ft 3�y �� , y � ' �t ��+�v awa� .rj';`�„r:�I ;1� ,'Yi ��� p �i1 1��� �yi111 �.�,�,.',, • 114j is 1�� �7'litlis0A r �f s c. �r. �t '�•• IrIll' ' ' PI " 1`�;�r • INN • #‘1.k • , „- -..-,-..„-„: 1,-.• ----5;:,4711- \ •\ga\ -44;4' \Tiel'Atit': -,‘.a...iirfoil,' ''- . .‘11 '..t-i--4.66 7g,; . 0 t , n:? C;i ,? {fir f YY+ �'OBk tO °"; O SYMBOLS ,�e OW� j/r �� P,1 Chaehel — I l.rti/L/Fo.A/04r cu 1F `-Ia3noti-'Arog ajHo-rt Wa Pvx „ "' +7 FI „a 4 v � Mitcel; BLACKRIVER n�we re-= xua I a ,�i `\ Nelson , LANDSCAPE PLAN \ Group ion CORPORATE PARK "°"'" . r—���� fro4 �„� l �y,� Incorporated RENTON WASHINGTON �yRRRc i r Lard...... FlRST CITY EQUITIES .-- Urban Orson KI:1 ..=11:3 `P""'` - - PHASE IV&V &°u 44,..; LANDSCAPE PLAN b. ,/ .lT NO Cr =„1745of7 • CNECN•YFL VICINITY MAP .- . .. --•• • •••• —-•••••— -— 4-- \ ..1,• , LEGAL DESCRIPTION TABULATION BLDGS A&B BLDGS C&D i 1 1- - -; -r,t•irE$51=5ERS - 7 ;• ,4,4"..*C".14,,,_ I hu . 'Lea" lett-.q= li • , Eitia' rt.:No earl, Site Area ±403,084 S.F. 1 I I I ±194,477 S.F. - • r I I sounnorr:r PHASE IV PHASE V SM.=SSSSSS Site[SST or°urn...ATMS SORMAST.ST 1 Building Footprint ± 47,000 S.F. ± 50,350 S.F. , , [-Li ,''" , '' ,I.I., IN-P:•1*-.,4,., •,..4,. ;. .....: site Coverage ±11.7% ±25.9% Mocha.Ave. 1-1 ic Gross Coverage ±36.i% ±25.9% i. 'i ' 1E1 I is PHASE11/--) l PHA72 1 ‘4 I . -.'d' ,' ,..„ .v0,4 ,.. .1 ,- o' i i 11111 SOOTS LISS er LOS I 01 SISS OP SENTO,LOT LISS ASTIFSIXLST le,IIII-SI TS FIRST CM[MIMI :li SCSOIES S.OS/ lla16.0.IS Parldng 4f. Standard ±473 Stags ±teo state t , 2:- • •-•,-,A'Vt.- . Area ItaLth Fidangsto "-4 -.14i4. ..------.-"r-r-- . ' Compact ±207 Strata (30%) ± 55 Stalls (24%) i • 200.TYPICAL `,„ 40.3/4 10. _.--r .414‘°_-_-.0.42,A1A1..- • Handicapped ± 10 Stalls ± 4 Stalls .. SHORELINE ,...w.gr ' ---_.,...,,,,..-_,....:--....-_5---• TOTAL ±690 Stalls(1/200 S.F. ±225 Stails (1/200 S.F. t Etz.., ,„-• DESIGNATION ../..-0,,,,,,,F..•--",.. - ,.,-..!•-..--,4,Ssi-- ...S.L'/Fis.,....4.,.fro. ... iiiiz1.27‘corgaxlpo 4.s.• v ra'L.,,,,, 3.... at 93.5%Efficoncy) et 80.0%Efficency) 4 .. .....--;401,-7•M-c__--=-,•;;=4,1,47''."-':,-0---- ',.. s—4..,.:::.,•,.4‘1"----,--• ...•,,,;~-t -_ ,...--.....r, n„..01°14'20 W 469.00, n .i..\ r---;:,' . [LT- Existing Phaso 2-i , a) .......,,O, Exiathag Phaao 1-.4, su•..r.o.n..,...„0 ,1•'' •...----. 4.4•••ALrf, .53::. .1 _\_ 03 .......v.-e-•-je a. Existing .• r f 8 ... I : ......./ G:r.n .: Balding 10 I,__' curY...Noverl. ' --- - ...,. . 8 01°14.2 .;--I_LI25 or? '$ '..1-11' 5'1 Icl .riti-T ,... 24'C.411,248.60 . CI. 1,.. . 62'Ce.41241.2.24 r 1 ' I es,a :0 0 i -%., ,w' - ,,,,:nwcur,....tus-,0—in - ti--p,o.co,/..11.82 . I liQ..- r. -1 , .-- 1 _ 144' - ' it--- .0 op wa- • a 2 >- ea' /. •'•• 1,'"• ,, Existing Building ;I-1 . A I.4-•...42,45, ..,•,,..., C si • & D Fsxn or CELIOLGo.K. , O, 0 0« Existing 3 !Rae. -• ID 0) 1,. Balding Id , - ..,s ' li, ,-,:i • / • `•_ 1 1 STORY R a 0 i'r— . [ . r ;i__ •9 •— .c ' - i F.F.17.6 ..1; 3 STORY OTROS N- i 11.1 , . . Lar....-in•I sg• t , '''' O74.000 S.F. '.....- Se. . -1 I' -Ir-... ''' ILI i 1 I , 22E.P..u_cil i..-,.,op , = 0(I) e• 1 . C..) CO <« •=../..--e.....,-....--•...144.1 Q8....aer-.4,C-0 okreo / 8 ........ ra 1 '10 i__T2,...,74..... ......„ ___ _____,„... ..._,_ fnu, i..11Ai....„:„ ---, .. , tilttt , 11 I i -Tar,Nrer0 RAZ.CT,r), \ 1 II ,rj r S'P4.1 _ \si:\I 71.11\ L'' ‘ r -t• ..01111 0 ,,,\.-\ . 1.....,•cec.a.c.,"„.1,........1 \ -'''''•-, 4'1'4-e-^--.7r-1Z, • --\._ ,V / t-rixca,..,...1 -4 ,••. IZI.-•.re-,.:rZi ',-,•,., C. 'a ' -6:-. ' 1110, ` 6.........---.....----. ' .‘s. ... -,, \,.. A‘i."---•,-,, --\ v . 2.. 'i,,,.\' 1 To.--6NE'l7rao4',U n' .,----..i..-,- ,---•-• -,-,,,,,.„ _ .10.-...k.A.-00., r L0.11-5.- .. \ '', • /./ ''...pra-. F..E°1,"-------- 1°\ _- A '` • gr-illr,j';'-'•alikVb-...... -- ''''"f'-' , .,„7,‘,,...2 2.2.-,-.` V ' 1,..•19:::'‘l \ ' ' v ‘i AV* ---•,, I .. . • ) 1 16VI.k...v 9 r-r '‘•\`''' ' ' 2 2,,e,,,,'C.G+2.,:w.a.., ^'.I., \, , .9,,.,•,•AP ..". / ''''IS ,...,:ciat i: ell.-- ,--P....3,D SFF- ',;41''' ., --FL.... . 6 \.1,,T1,1!:...1 ,,,..........,.....666.,-.IIIILL6.......''- NO °MAL,. CATE } \,,v1 -_ ,1,21's4"'4//_ '', ......,. • ,0.A...._7Ye) - .1rI: _-.---------- , °,5•• • ----- • ........, 'ole, \.•,,,.,,, - -' •-•.-10,•:. •.° ilk --' , \ 111111 • .0,--. .t.1--R 0,r, 4V • .1, 1 40 \ 1. .....-----'- I0 N ' ---------- HyDR.R.R.(Typs) -71:CLS4,na(.-0,•VI'IRE-.7.S.) i Codi •,,,, . ,,,,----• . ..", iii# • ...•. --'- - \ SYMBOLS-I- ,P-1 Channel , •-'"--•SI.,co--ts•Avtz.../ .s • / J 4• / 14rCee'4,.. /' t 0 .426-notr-f•Ner.rf- * RI VERi:---• ..';" EARL.': Tia' 1 11 I , 5°' g g 30. ,o• P-I Charm. SITE SECTION A r-loo' 2 ?:I d 0 I i R...10,3 0 / ErtOctSs.C O L. _&°. :12 dC Mr . \ .---‘,. , • 'I. % .-,.,...' % '• ......-k 1 . % (NI-1;*''.'' \\N 'aQ°-lift•-• 1 i I Le`a ,;.;;.,Xe., ,,,, "c" -A,,.....,, I . ;' P.O.,EC.T ........- 1 ".'. i #\- --EP:ElaUZIG,G:43:'' 1 ,y,,,,,: LOC411012 i e ,•,..,i i•,,lts•,,,,‘.I •92,1. 0i.,i.''— .... • - • 'II GP --1-1-4•.•-• ','-'..f. • -0e. VICINITY MAP OF ADJACENT USES 6,44.-,14`...,.-..k., '.."' ..51,'11.' 'i''''‘-. '' BLACKR1VER f i -"---cf-21., CORPORATE PARK '€-K-1°- , . i::.,.',."%.•`.. 2 60 ..„.. ,:17,.:,..: RENTON z,..., _ ....,,,i I.' 'Y.-,.:. FIRST CITY EQUITIES ..1 ;11`1V-1"."4 '.t. PHASE IV&V *.••••4 ...2. •,-4:-,,,,e,f.a.L0 :--•,,.4.'-',. •,-, 'kr."-::-'-• SITE PLAN . WASHINGTON ...-- :51 SO. 1001 . .., ... t : SITE PLAN , JOB NO 04c47/ secs/.K.oF - - • , :c....."...,:;-...,_. 1 of 71 . . • OF RA, �� Co BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Z o • .RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR „IL 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O911- 0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: • -NOVEMBER 18, 1987 TO: : • FILE . FROM: , I.,. JERRY LIND SUBJECT: BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK, PHASES IV & V FILE: SA-090-87, SM-013-87, ECF-078-87 " A parking count for the above referenced project Shows—that the applicant is 'providing a total .of 915 parking stalls for the combined phases. Of this total , 262 parking stalls are proposed to be designated. at compact stalls (28.6% of total ) . This figure could be increased and still meet code .and thus, would allow more more open space on .the site to aid in the retention and protection . of existing trees. •' At 30% compact, 274 stalls wou•ld .be allowed. . .At 40% compact, 366 stalls would be allowed (perfmittedif "designated employee parking") . 40% compact parking' would allow an extra 104 parking stalls and amount to an addition • of' 3,744 square feet of additional open space. Finally, phase IV is itimized at 93.5% efficency for .calculating the 'net usable space for parking based at office standards.. This seems rather high as an average in' the trade is usually closer to. 85%. Phase V is ,. itimized at 89".8% efficency in 'calculating net usuable space for parking. This too seems onAhe high side.' If the .efficiency level of the' office space is lowered in the four buildings, many additional .parking spaces could be deleted. r - • 1 , 1 I 1 . ._ k . /if •-17 Ofizivilkd \)1 1 ) . onsg f r1404 Wkz / ) Isirtiraii§V#, eale , 7 A4 7 (2,, 1 , 0 •:; • • ,.:. : • WATER (Phases 1 and 2) * Careful construction practices will prevent litter, debris or other pollutants from, entering drainage. • Utilize temporary detention ponds during construction phases to collect silt. * Collect stormwater runoff in a storm sewer system, as approved by Renton Public Works Department. • Utilize catch basins and screens to collect litter and debris. ▪ Utilize oil/water separators to retain gas, oil and grease for removal from stormwater. • Settling basins would remove solids from runoff. ▪ Skimmers would remove petroleum products and floating debris. • Provide adequate street and parking area cleaning and maintenance of the stormwater system. * The drainage from the northwest portion of the site will be directed to either an on-site detention pond or the P-1 Channel if it is constructed. ▪ Wetland treatment could be enharrred by constructing a gabion at the downstream end of the Black River Channel as a means of increasing runoff detention time and increasing surface water contact area for the one- year storm and smaller flows. • FLORA/FAUNA (Phases 1 and 2) * Retention of as many of the existing trees as possible through sensitive site planning as indicated in Figure 4, p. 2 of the Draft EIS. * A landscape plan will be prepared to assure good design practice and consistency throughout the site. * Retain vegetation outsides of road and railroad improvements until buildings are constructed, as feasible. • The new landscaping plan should include compatible and similar species to the existing vegetation. • ( f Minor modifications of building siting could occur based upon tree inventories provided by field surveys. New natural riparian vegetation shall be planted along the drainageway banks, providing cover and habitat. Utilize landscaping materials that provide food sources for birds and small animals. • Mitigations to preserve surface water quality should be implemented. • -72- Architecture and Planning 110 Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 November 3, 1987 ENA COURIERS .m.; "'m ' 'f-` , - "-= ' g ' N' ',I 1-1 -(:(,',V-1 LH Mr. Jerry Lind L, U Planning Department �;P, ,,:, t4, City of Renton BU ,,....,,'..;' / ''F' '� �, DEPT. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Phase IV and Phase V — Drainage Site Approval Submittal — SA-090-87 Environmental Checklist — ECF-078-87 Shoreline Permit — SM-018-87 Dear Jerry: Per your conversation with Barbara Moss regarding the conflict in the Environmental Checklist and drainage drawing, the checklist is correct. All drainage for the Phases IV and V sites will go north — into Oakesdale, 7th, and Naches respectively and biofiltered in an open swale before entering the P-1 Pond. Attached is a revised print reflecting the grading and a revised reduction of the grading for your use. Respectfully, Ro a A. Berg P sident RAB:cpm Enclosure cc: Barbara Moss Mark Miller David Schuman Ken Chin ;� — V F . ________:i..11 r; -_ iJ ( ; -^Y9' / Lie i —^ ---- ------^-- ------� L ----- — _--- --- —n— Lil— o "" o-,rl ri Hill n_r rrrrrr r r-- to y o i' L • - ... -''''Esc._: : .. w %� ,a 1 •��ryI-;�� M� V 7 0 I cl.. ® des lil ....... - 4_, , . ., 1 ,...w . .. E a >>>r 0 u) e ♦\ _ f "1.4 , G i 5-II I. Al • 'COW" r7 lee'-431.y1R"' ci I , j� 1 �+ �e-. . I— • • oir•�.' cam-! �A .` 6 ,,'fin u li .• -�� ���asn�.y. I 'r `� iF 1 a • \''\\.\. '-- . ,4, A :--- ,----. ° --cal--V ,,. ,.,... ._....0_,%...-°`- .,,, ---------- . X<'Z\1...4',..-4 ' .04.. % �I .t L •t /-,� .o C[sCwnoN DM 41-i-\----:_, \.." "\l/ 1 • . BLACKRIVER ip --, ,,..... . ,r.l. CORPORATE PARK r °"'" ;." RENTON WASHINGTON FIRST CITY EQUITIES .00 PHASE IV&V Nov oz e® :"::',:-' """' ... •9':41.00 Dr..1 ae' MOO • r, "f a rw„ : co CL _ I:�r . 11. 1 � o 0 s. B _ _-.` . - G 11- >L cr ui i Y.be iii 0 - J _ u c_ ,3 p .z i t _ 1 �yj;� V co c '.oA.-..r..ie4• _t.,v-t_1,s,0';7 i,i. , .- -_- - � .... .Gam: '—.....-•. f7 am.=,• \ t���►�/ ��!...,,„`f. -e��`�'��0,--, t - 1 „. 1i ��. ' t "�1 1 ill 4,.:. A ,I.,:.... .:' ,„1,,6,---\--, 14,_ 1141......:._.:.V e.'• 1 , 1 i 0 , X<`;\4,.•4t,4i, o c i i o --. ,.„,,„,, ,,__. .... ..., ., vs, \‘ • ...Ca- ' • / '\\\.N. '' N-......... ,„.... .till••••&-' ..... ..,-- ' I . Demo!, i , \ . ,,s, s‘s:..,Airo.mhz. 4...: -,;„ :------ . — BLACKRIVER ri I CORPORATE PARK RENTON FIRST CITY EOUiTE3 "'" WASHINGTON '" -" a., o 6. AA • PHASE IV&V • ..... ...EOEO. JOEO i 6,QT MO Or xavoz eEr ' Duna Architecture and Planning r_l I Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 l r; L , October 27, 1987 L.. ; z:i ?,1' ': ' / /Lrii, !G rip- :,,_;j L: Mr. Jerry Lind Department of Building & Zoning City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase IV and V Site Plan Review (No. SA-090-87), Landscape Requirements Dear Jerry: Pursuant to the Renton Building Regulations, Section 4-718(C)5,c, requiring a minimum of 20% of the site to be retained in landscaped open spaces, our current proposed landscaped open spaces are: 1. Phase IV: + 100,770 S.F. = 25% 2. Phase V: + 54,450 S.F. = 28% The above areas are exclusive of all proposed walks and paved areas, and exceed the 20% required areas. Final drawings will vary in amounts but will be over 20%. Please do not hesitate to call if there are any questions. Si erel b , it,..______„ ___---- 7 Y Ken K. Chin, AIA YKKC:cpm cc: Barbara Moss Mark Miller FROM: SHIPPER NAi:E TC CONS,,,, NAME CONTROL NUMBER ADDRESS A S DATE isDRIVER 1 DRIVER 2 Fo CITY ZIP ZONE CITY ZIP ZONE CUSTOMER NUMBER y CHARGE TO SHIPPING CHARGE SERVI9E.TYPE CODE CHARGES r PO COLL - i'A�i A Q DESCRIPTION OF GOODS(SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS I INFORMATION I DRIVER PAYOUT/FTC.i PIECES WEIGHT CUST.REF I ., ..a , .:,1 CUST.REF.2 DECLARED VALUE C.0 0 AMOUNT CHARGES WAIT TIME WAIT TIME CUST.REF.3 • PPD I COLL ao SHIPPER PICK-UP DRIVER P.U.DATE DEL.DATE RECEIVED IN GOOD ORDER TOTAL CHARGES a z a o P.U.TIME DEL.TIME Z_ o Lu o ¢ E/VA COURIERS 214525 DELIVERY RECEIPT RMS AND CONDITIONS 1. The carrier shall be liable only for loss, damage or injury to the goods carried and then only to the extent of the value of those goods, which value the customer agrees shall not exceed$2.00 per pound for all goods carried under this bill of lading, unless a higher value is declared in writing by the customer. G 0 f 2. No liability for such loss,damage or injury shall exist unless the customer gives notice in writing to the carrier within 9 months of such event. • 0 0 Z 3. All shipments received are subject to local tariffs, terms and conditions with respect to rates and payment o Z either as imposed by law and regulation and all delivery charges must be paid in accordance therewith. ai CITY OF RENTON "a u 'V BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director October 22, 1987 Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104, RE: Blackriver Corporate Park - Phases IV & V, File Nos. : SA-090-87, ECF-078-87, SM-01 -87 Dear Ms. Moss: The Building and Zoning Department has formally accepted your Site Plan Approval and Shoreline Management application for , the above referenced project. Your application has been routed and tentatively scheduled for the Environmental Review Committee on November 18, 1987, to •. . consider your environmental checklist. ' If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of your project, please contact Jeanette Samek-McKague of this office at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE: :cb 200 Mill Avenue South.-:Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540. . E.R.C. CONDITIONS Satisfied Not Satisfied HEARING EXAMINER CONDITIONS Satisfied Not Satisfied COMMENTS/RESOLUTION OF ABOVE Reviewer Date FORM 210 • ZONING DIVISION PLAN CHECK WORKSHEET APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-090-87, SM-013-87, ECF-078-87 ADDRESS: PHONE: PROJECT NAME: BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK -PHASE IV & V LAND USE ZONE: 0-P (OFFICE PARK) BRIEF DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT TWO 74,000 SQ. FT. BUILDINGS, 3 -STORY EACH' AND ' TWO ONE-STORY .BUILDINGS OF APPROXIMATELY 30,750 SQ. FT. .8c 19,000 SQ. FT. SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ARE APPLIED FOR. SITE PLAN APPROVAL & SUBSTANTIAL SHORELINES DEVELOPMENT PERMIT REQUIRED: • DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Required/Allowed Project Okay a. Density N/A • N/A _ - b. Lot Size N/A. _ 13.7 ACRES OK . - c. Lot Width N/A VARIES OK . d. Lot Depth N/A VAIRES OK 60' STREETS 60-140' • OK e. Setbacks 20' OTHER YARDS 45-150' ' • OK 1. Front 2. Side • 3. Rear f. Special Setbacks NONE N/A - g. Height 45 FEET 45 FEET OK 11.7% PHASE IV OK • h. Lot Coverage N/A 25.9% PHASE V OK i. Signs N/A - - 2% OF SITE FOR WILDLIFE. Q%C2FRS�I�E IN LANDSCAPE j. Landscaping/ { Screening 20 FEET STREETS 20-60 FEET OK k. Irrigation REQD. FOR BLDG.' PERMIT 1. Parking/Loading 1:200 OFFICE . • Required Parking Stalls • Compact • Handicapped 2% 50 FEE1 INDUST. • - • Driveways (width) -30 FEET OFFICE 35-45 FEET ' • NO • Loading Areas N/A - - • Aisle Widths 24 FEET ' 24 FEE1 OK m. Recreation N/A - N/A n. Bonds Architecture and Planning - IT Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A. Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 ALL, c \W MEMORANDUM Li- 013 f 15.i 8 DUB L.DI G I ZONING DEPT. TO: Mr. Jerry Lind DATE: October 14, 1987 Building & Zoning Dept. • City of Renton PROJECT: Blackriver Corporate Park 200 Mill Avenue South Phases IV & V . Renton, WA 98055 PROJECT NO: NW87O37/NW87O38 SUBJECT: Site Plan Review Per our telephone conversation of October 13, 1987, Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase IV and Phase V, submitted for Site Plan Review on October 6, 1987, has yet to be placed on the schedule for public hearing. It was noted that due to the backlog of projects to be reviewed, it may take four months before Phase IV and V will be up for public hearing. Please inform us of the hearing date as soon as you are able to schedule it. Also let us now what we can do to help decrease the time required for the review process. Notice of Shoreline Permit Application was submitted on October 12, 1987 for publication in the Renton Record Chronicals via the Valley Daily Newspapers. We will submit the Affidavit of Publication to you as soon as it is issued to us. Please do not hesitate to call if there are any questions or if we can be of any assistance. BY: Y. Ken K. Chin cc: Barbara Moss Mark Miller Royce Berg CITY OF r 2IIill:T o:II p NM OCT 06'1987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. First City Equities Blackriver Corporate Park (Valley 405) Phase IV and Phase V Project Narrative This proposal is for the design and construction of Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase IV, two 74,000 S.F. three—story office buildings (A & B) and Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase V, two, one—story buildings (C & D) of approximately 30,750 S.F. and 19,600 S.F. Phases IV and V will be developed on sites of approximately 403,000 S.F. (9.25 acres) and 194,000 S.F. (4.45 acres) respectively. Both Phases are planned to incorporate landscaped areas, preserve existing trees and create outdoor plazas. Pedestrian walks along with the plazas interconnect buildings of each phase and connect with Phase I to the east. Seating areas will be provided in the plazas. Access for Phase IV will be from SW 7th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. Primary access for Phase V will be from SW 7th Street. Emergency vehicle access is provided to and from existing adjacent sites (Phases I and II) leading to Powell Avenue SW to the east. The design for two, three—story office buldings of Phase IV uses concrete tilt— up panels and tinted glass. The use of reflective glass curtain walls emphasizes the points of entry and provides contrast to the concrete panels as well as reducing energy usage by controlling heat gain in the buildings. The two, one—story Office/R&D buildings of Phase V are designed as concrete tilt—up buildings with cast—in—place reveals and tinted glass. Reflective glass is used to emphasize the points of entry and provide contrast at the building corners. Existing and planned land uses within 1,000 feet of the project site are compatible with the proposed development. Existing office and warehouse buildings are to the east, northeast and southeast of the project site. Vacant lots planned for office and warehouse uses are to the north and south. The Metro sewage treatment plant is to the west across Oakesdale Avenue and the P-1 Channel. 1`sY• o C TY • OF RENTO' T FILE NO(S): :SA-- 090-SI • C. Fs 0 + BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMItivT r�-�" -'078-"8.7 , ..0 c - Cal?--1 N� MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION • NAME FEES First City Equities 0 REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* Seattle, Washington 98104 gEV SITE PLAN APPROVAL a-/jF1 iJG TELEPHONE. SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL (206) 624-9223 0 VARIANCE*No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON From Section: * Justification Required NAME XXX SHORELINE PERMIT Barbara E. Moss (Director of Planning) ' ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: , 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 0 SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP 0 TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, Washington 98104 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT , TELEPHONE 0 FINAL PLAT (206) 624-9223 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: First City Equities + ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 0 PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 0 FINAL Seattle, Washington 98104 TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: (206) 624-9223 0 Residential 0 Industrial Commercial 0 Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS; PROPERTY ADDRESS CD South of SW 7th and east of Oakesdale. TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY vacant OP d FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Phase IV: Office Buildings NUMBER OF SPACES: Phase V: Office/R&D Buildings ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE toSo i 618 SQ. FT. ACRES ,y� �� AREA: TOTAL FEES V°�198,350 SF Bldqs. 13.7 Acre Site ��I'�.J61P1„ 2 n 1i`' ,,, 11 V1.,i� !i TA'F' USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING OAT OSTAMP LJ i� 1j APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: 1.},'`- _'�, i ---.YQJV"-I.N-• Liv'vlbt--- APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: Accepted i 1G/ZcW\16 `L, 1 • 0 ' Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: jIll Q APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: r( I v ?ZI 1 0 Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials)_ ROUTED TO: Building iI Design Eng. JX1 Fire Parks ILA Police Ei Policy Dev. IX Traffic Eng. ® Utilities RRVTRRf 1-.11_ow Legal description of property (If more space is required, attach a separate sheet). SEE ATTACHED. AFFIDAVIT David Schuman ,' being duly sworn, declare that I am 0 authorized representative to act for the property owner,] owner of the property Involved In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS '9r7 Y' M:14TONf? sr• DAY OF C o'o.s._ p L) L id L./ 15"71-1 . CC.7 61187 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF 'G/?GNING DEPT. WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT _ (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 (Address) (Address) Seattle, WA 98104 - _ (City) (State) (Zip) (206) 624-9223 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Blackriver Corporate Park Phase IV & Phase V NW87037/NW87038 THAT PORTION OF LOT 2, CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 001-86, AS FILED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8609179004, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF SOUTHWEST SEVENTH STREET AND EAST OF OAKESDALE AVENUE SOUTHWEST, AS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF RENTON BY DEED FILED UNDER RECORDER' S NUMBERS 8702100643, 8702100644 AND 8704091071 AND NORTH OF THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 OF CITY OF RENTON LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 015-85 AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDER'S NO. 8512169001 RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. FIRST CITY EQUITIES BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK BRH JOB NO. 87233 OCTOBER 2, 1987 ALH/SURV. 19 iiiii\cck L. oi0.0 OF -Jr • ‘c FG�S7ER�9 .4,, �� ,tl1 s r s��NAI LAND 0 • CIT'; CP r> NTON 611814 iG/ZGf ING DEPT. CITY OF R7INT0N • *- uu au.6.187 CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY uwNErwbITE PLAN BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK - PHASE IV & V APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-090-87 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER Holvick, Dereget, Koering .1230 0,aknead Pwy. 918800000090 Suite 210 918800004007 Sunnyvale, CA 94086 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. 242304909805 Renton, WA 98055 First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 9188000100 Seattle, WA 98104 9188000110 9188000140 . ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER CERTIFICATION I, Y. Ken K. Chin . hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at citizY3,0 , on the S day of etke�2s I ,7. .\K\ SIGNED: CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. JERRY F. LIND , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on NOV. 19, 1987 • to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at EC Ai-r on theme , day of n, ) c 87. o,-) SIGNED: Li rvwL FORM 70B Architecture and Planning PnPomero Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Be«,A.LA., 1127.Fine Street,Su to 3'J(iflS€aftle,WA 98101(206)583-8030 n m-c oe 97 TRANSMITTAL BUlLD1NGZONtNG DEPT. To: Planning Department Date: October 5, 1987 City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Project Name: BCP - Phase IV & Phase V Renton, WA 98055 Project No: NW87037/NW87038 Attn: Jerry Lind Re: Site Plan Approval & Shoreline Permit Submittal Description: 1 Ea. Original Site Plan Approval Application 'w/legal description Original Shoreline Permit Application w/legal description Environmental Checklist Project Narrative 7 copies Above applications with legal , Environmental Checklist and Project Narrative 1 Ea. List of Adjacent Owners w/mailing labels and postage 7 Ea. . Prints: Site Plan w/vicinity map, grading & utilities plan, existing topography plan (2) , bldg. elevations (2) sheets and landscape plan. 1 Ea. 82x11 PMT reduction of above prints 1 Ea. FCE Check #10175 Application Fee for Site Plan Approval , Shoreline Permit Application and Environmental Checklist Review. Remarks: �E ❑ Sent per your Request IA For Approval ❑ Other: ❑ For your Use/Reference ❑ For Distribution ❑ For Review and Comment ❑ For your Records Please call if there are any questions. HAND DELIVERED By; Y. Ken K. Chin Barbara Moss cc: Mark Miller First City Equities Blackriver Corporate Park (Valley 405) Phase IV and Phase V Project Narrative This proposal is for the design and construction of Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase IV, two 74,000 S.F. three—story office buildings (A & B) and Blackriver Corporate Park, Phase V, two, one—story buildings (C & D) of approximately 30,750 S.F. and 19,600 S.F. Phases IV and V will be developed on sites of approximately 403,000 S.F. (9.25 acres) and 194,000 S.F. (4.45 acres) respectively. Both Phases are planned to incorporate landscaped areas, preserve existing trees and create outdoor plazas. Pedestrian walks along with the plazas interconnect buildings of each phase and connect with Phase I to the east. Seating areas will be provided in the plazas. Access for Phase IV will be from SW 7th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW. Primary access for Phase V will be from SW 7th Street. Emergency vehicle access is provided to and from existing adjacent sites (Phases I and II) leading to Powell Avenue SW to the east. The design for two, three—story office buldings of Phase IV uses concrete tilt— up panels and tinted glass. The use of reflective glass curtain walls emphasizes the points of entry and provides contrast to the concrete panels as well as reducing energy usage by controlling heat gain in the buildings. The two, one—story Office/R&D buildings of Phase V are designed as concrete tilt—up buildings with cast—in—place reveals and tinted glass. Reflective glass is used to emphasize the points of entry and provide contrast at the building corners. Existing and planned land uses within 1,000 feet of the project site are compatible with the proposed development. Existing office and warehouse buildings are to the east, northeast and southeast of the project site. Vacant lots planned for office and warehouse uses are to the north and south. The Metro sewage treatment plant is to the west across Oakesdale Avenue and the P-1 Channel. CITY OF r,Icei Il`�,11 OCT 061987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Exhibit I: Documents Related To Project Site: A. Grading & Fill for Valley 405 Business Park: 1. City of Renton Grading and Fill Permit Application No.SP-100- 86, approved. 2. Renton Shoreline Permit Application No. SM-004-87, withdrawn. 3. Environmental Checklist No. ECF-024-87. B. BlackRiver Corporate Park (BCP) - Phase IV: 1. Renton Site Plan Approval Application No. SA-001-87, withdrawn. 2. Renton Shoreline Permit Application No. SM-001-87, withdrawn. C. BCP Infrastructure (withdrawn from Renton per City's request) : 1. Renton Site Approval Application No. SA-108-86, application withdrawn per City of Renton's request. 2. Renton Shoreline Permit Application No. SM-005-86, application withdrawn per City of Renton's request. D. P-1 Channel, City of Renton: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM-093-81, approved and issued. 2. Renton Special Permit No. SP-060-81. E. Earlington Industrial Park: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM=91-81. 2. Preliminary and Final Plat - WA. Technical Center Plat. F. 0akesdale L.I.D. , City of Renton: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM-004-81, approved and issued. Ci YOFREN O, OCT 061987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. Exhibit I: Miscellaneous References: A. Letter from First City Equities to City of Renton with enclosure, dated February 23, 1987, pertaining to Site Plan Apprval of Phase IV at Valley 405 Section of property. B. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Letters indicating that Valley 405 site was not subject. to COE Section 404 (Clean Water Act) jurisdiction. To Barbara Moss, First City Equities, March 4, 1987. To Delton Bonds, Alterra Corporation, December 16, 1985. CITY OF 132N7n ff BUILDIN0''7l 6 o.Ni G/CTZOIN19R7G pEPT, Exhibit II: Documents related to other adjacent property owned by FCE: A. Rezone: City of Renton, File No. R-057-80. B. E.I.S. for Black River Office Park by Thorpe & Associates, April 1981 DEIS, April 1982 FEIS. C. Grading & Fill. 1. Renton Grading & Fill Permit: Application No. SP-024-86, Permit No. B-12252 issued. 2. Shoreline Application to be submitted. 3. Washington State, Department of Natural Resources, Permit No. F. P. 09-10246 for Forest Practice, issuance date: 3/29/87. D. ADMAC Building 1. Renton Site Plan Approval Application No. SA-057-86, approved and issued. 2. Renton Building Permit Application No. 4236, expired. 3. Renton Variance Application to extend Naches cul-de-sac, No. V-058-86, denied by Hearing Examiner. Exhibit II: Miscellaneous References. A. Shipe, S.J. and W.W. Scott. 1981. the Great Heron in King County. Washington Game Department, Non-Game Program. With letter of February 12, 1987. B. Letter of Independent Ecological Services to First City Equities of January 31, 1987, pertaining to the Heron Rookery. C. City of Renton Wetlands Study, 1981. D. Letters from Corps of Engineers noting property not subject to the Clean Water Act, Section 404 jurisdiction; December 16, 1985 and March 4, 1987. E. Letter from Barbara Moss of FCE to Don Erickson of City of Renton dated April 10, 1987, regarding Shoreline Designation, with memo from David Morency to Barbara Moss, dated April 13, 1987. F. Department of Ecology — Wetlands Determination dated April 27, 1987. CM' OF RENTOra City of Renton OCT 0 61g87 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accuracy and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from you own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers now may avoid delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. 1 USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decision on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to words "project,""applicant,"and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Blackriver Corporate Park,Phase IV and V 2. Name of applicant: First City Equities (FCE) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Checklist Preparation: R.W. Thorpe &Associates, Inc. Planning, Landscape, Environment,Economics 618 Second Ave. 1300 Alaska Bldg Seattle,WA 98104 Contact Persons: Ed Murray, R.W. Thorpe, AICP (206) 624-6239 Applicants: First City Equities 800 Fifth Ave, Suite 4170 Seattle,WA 98104 Contact Person: Barbara E.Moss (206) 624-9223 ' 4. Date checklist prepared: October 5, 1987 2 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Ave. South Renton,WA 98055 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction has been planned to begin in Spring, 1988 and completed the Winter of 1989. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No future additions or expansions are planned for these two phases of development. Future activities will be for tenant improvements. The property is part of the Blackriver Corporate Park currently under development in other areas. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared,directly related to this proposal. Earlington Park EIS, R.W. Thorpe&Assoc. (DEIS, July, 1980; FEIS, Feb., 1981) Black River Office Park EIS, R.W. Thorpe & Assoc. (DEIS, April, 1981; FEIS, April, 1982) Refer to attached reference list for additional related information. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. City of Renton Special Permit for Grading and Filling Application,SP-100-86, approved. Refer to attached reference list for additional related information. 3 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site Plan Approval Shorelines Management Substantial Development Permit Building Permits 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Phase IV: Design and construction of two three-story office buildings (A and B) totaling 148,000 S.F. on a vacant piece of property. Parking shall be provided at 1/200 as required by Code. Landscaped yards to be incorporated with the buildings and parking on approximately 403,000 S.F. of site for this phase of development. Phase V: Design and construction of two one-story, concrete tilt-up, office/light manufacturing buildings (C and D) totaling 50,350 S.F.. Parking will be provided as required by Code. Approximately 194,000 S.F. of site area will be developed for this phase. The buildings are planned with landscaped yards, courtyard, and areas around preserved existing trees. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is East of the P-1 channel location and East of and adjacent to the recently constructed S.W. Oakesdale Avenue extension, South of S.W. Seventh Street, North of S.W. Grady Way and I-405, and West of S.W. Powell Ave. S24, T23N, R4E. Refer to attached legal description,Site Plan, and Vicinity Map. 4 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS. 1.Earth a. General description of the site (circle or underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The topography has been altered by filling and grading completed in the site shoreline area by the Soil Conservation Service Green River Eastside Watershed Project under City of Renton Special Permit SP-060-81 and Department of Ecology Shoreline Substantial Development Permits SM-093-81. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximately percent slope)? Generally the site has a gentle slope(about two percent) to the South. Refer to topography map of site(also see comment for la above). c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Refer to soils studies by Earth Consultants, Inc. (Preliminary Soil and Foundation Investigation, Earlington Park, April 9, 1979). Also Urban soils due to P-1 Channel relocation and fill. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. 5 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The proposal includes filling and grading the site to an elevation of between approximately 16 and 18 feet (refer to Schematic Grading Plans for Phase IV and V). The old Springbrook Creek channel and the shoreline corridor located on the site have already been filled to an elevation of between 14 and 16 feet with approximately 50,000 to 60,000 cu.yds. of material from the P-1 Channel excavation. This work was completed by the Soil Conservation Service during their construction of the P-1 Channel under City of Renton Special Permit SP-060-81 and Department of Ecology Shoreline Substantial Development Permits SM-093-81. Fine grading and minor filling would be required in this already filled area during further development of the site. Filling and grading on the balance of the site, outside of the site shoreline area, was discussed in a previous checklist (ECF-024-87) for a Special Permit for Grading and Filling (SP 100-86) which has been approved. This filling and grading would require deposition of approximately 42,800 cu.yds. of material and would be completed according to that permit. Source of fill material is unknown at this time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use? If so, generally describe. Minor,locally isolated runoff erosion and wind erosion could occur during construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 85%. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary sedimentation ponds, erosion control ditches and silt fences will be used to reduce erosion during construction. 6 1 ,1 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the.air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust would result from construction activities along with emissions from diesel engines of trucks and equipment. Passenger vehicle emissions would increase after the site is developed. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions? Traffic from nearby highways and roads, and on-going construction in Blackriver Corporate Park. Also, adjacent construction activities on the Metro sewerage treatment plant. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water trucks will be used as necessary to reduce dust during construction. Avoid unnecessary idling of construction equipment. Refer to the Guidelines for the Transportation Management Plan of Blackriver Corporate Park--Renton 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The western boundary of the site is within approximately 155 feet of the recently relocated P-i Channel/Springbrook Creek which eventually flows into the Green River. 7 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Although S.W. Oakesdale Ave.is located in the shoreline environment and separates the site from the new P-1 Channel location, an approximately 45-foot wide corridor of the shoreline environment is located on the West boundary of the property along the East side of the road. Fine grading and minor filling would be required within this 45-foot wide corridor during development of the site, and would include landscaping features (including some existing or relocated trees) and paved parking areas. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. All grading and filling on the site would be in accordance with SP-100-86, which has already been approved, and subsequent permits for the site. No filling or dredging in surface water or wetlands is planned for this proposal. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes, refer to the Overall Site Plan.. However, the floodplain was altered by the new P-1 Channel and detention pond. FCE dedicated 17 acres of the northwest portion of the site for the detention pond to mitigate any loss of storage capacity and potential site flooding for the region,and for wildlife mitigation. 8 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Only stormwater runoff. Refer to section c below. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No ground water will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to the ground water. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of runoff for this proposal is stormwater from building roofs and pavements. Stormwater drainage facilities will incorporate City of Renton standard pipe and catch basin collection system. As outlined as a mitigation measure the Earlington Park EIS (DEIS, July, 1980; FEIS, Feb., 1981, R.W. Thorpe & Assoc.), stormwater runoff will be routed through tightlined pipes to the East,then North along SW Naches Ave. where it will empty into a vegetated drainage channel leading to the detention pond to the West. 9 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. Petroleum residues, traces of heavy metals, and silts from roads could enter the storm drainage systems. Treatment proposed below would prevent these materials from causing more than a minor impact. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Oil/water separators, silt traps in catch basins, and biofilter swales will be employed to reduce the amount of pollutants entering the P-1 Channel/pond. Sheet-flow through grassed areas and swale vegetation will act as a biofilter to remove additional contaminants prior to stormwater merging with the channel. Open ditches for collection, temporary sedimentation ponds, and erosion control fences will provide protection during construction. . 4. Plants a. Check, circle,or underline types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, otherwillow, cottonwoods X evergreen tree: fir,cedar, pine, other X shrubs hawthorne, blackberry X grass turf grass (majority of vegetation) _pasture _crop or grain _wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,other _other types of vegetation. • b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Grass, shrubs, and some of the trees on the site would be removed with this proposal. The majority of larger significant trees and smaller trees that can be relocated will be saved. 10 Refer to the tree survey for Valley 405, Bush, Roed, and Hitchings, April 22, 1985; annotated by the Mitchell Nelson Group,Inc., September 22, 1987. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to exist on the site nor were any found during the site visit made to verify site vegetation. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping is shown on the Landscape Plan. Landscaping around the perimeter and buildings would be similar to the existing landscaping in Blackriver Corporate Park. A majority of the significant trees will be preserved as discussed above. Through the Oakesdale LID, the proponents are contributing significantly to landscaping on both sides of Oakesdale Ave. Note:previous proposals have provided a 20 acre riparian habitat on the North half of the Corporate Park. An additional 17 acres of pond and wetland area was dedicated to the City during the platting of the South half of the project. Also, a drainage ditch/swale enhancement project has been implemented on adjacent properties. 5. Animals a. Circle or underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle. songbirds,other: seagulls, ducks, miscellaneous migratory waterfowl and shorebirds. mammals: deer,bear, elk, beaver,other: fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: No fish were found during SCS relocation of the P-1 Channel/Springbrook Creek. 11 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known to inhabit the site. Great Blue Herons northwest of the site have been proposed as a monitored species. An immature Bald Eagle was sited flying over an adjacent site in the spring of 1987,but there is no known history of Bald Eagle use of this site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The P-i Channel and pond are used by migratory waterfowl and shorebirds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Refer to mitigations discussed above for plants. Preserved and dedicated natural areas as well as on-site and off-site landscaping and preserved trees will provide habitat for wildlife in the area. The heron rookery is located on an island in the pond. Proposed temporary and permanent stormwater drainage facilities as well as the dedicated pond and wetland areas will mitigate water quality impacts on fish and other aquatic life. 6. Energy and Natural Resources. a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be used to heat cool and light the buildings. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. 12 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The construction of all structures will comply with the Washington Energy Code (Chapter 51-12 WAC) and any other applicable energy codes. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special services beyond what is already provided would be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None required or anticipated. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Background traffic and construction equipment noise. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other) indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term noise associated with construction of office buildings in urban areas typically average between 76 and 89 dBA with the loudest average noise level occurring during 13 excavation and finishing (USEPA, NTID 300.1, December 31, 1971). Long-term noise after construction would include normal traffic noise for parking areas and surrounding streets. Noise duration would be limited to the usual workday and construction hours. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise would be limited to the hours permitted by ordinance. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant and undeveloped. It was previously Earlington Golf Course. North: undeveloped future office and R&D buildings, and P-1 detention pond. East: office/warehouse buildings. South: undeveloped property, highways, and Longacres Race Track (i.e.,South of Grady &I-405). West: mixed industrial use (includes Metro Treatment Plant) beyond Oakesdale Ave. and P-1 Channel. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not in the last+or- 80 years. Previously, Earlington Golf Course. c. Describe any structures on the site. There are no structures on the site. 14 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? O-P(Office Park District). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MP/MO(Office--Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option- Office). g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban -- approximately 45-foot wide corridor on western boundary of site adjacent to S.W. Oakesdale Ave. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive"area? If so,specify. Yes. The area of the 100-year floodplain on the site is considered environmentally sensitive according to State Environmental Policy Act Regulations (WAC 197-11-908). Refer to the Overall Site Plan for the floodplain boundary. However, the floodplain was altered by the Soil Conservation Service filling of the old Springbrook Creek channel on the site and the construction of the new P-1 Channel and detention pond. FCE has dedicated 17 acres to the northwest of the site for the detention pond to mitigate any loss of storage capacity and potential site flooding,as well as for wildlife mitigation. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 620 based on approximately 200,000 S.F. (3.1/1000 S.F.). 15 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Proposed uses are compatible with adjacent uses and the comprehensive plan and zoning designations. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 16 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Phase IV: 45-foot maximum plus mechanical screen for roof mounted equipment. Phase V: 25-foot maximum plus mechanical screen for roof mounted equipment. Painted concrete and reflective glass exterior building materials will be used for both phases. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping and building materials are compatible with surrounding development. The majority of significant larger trees and smaller trees that can be relocated will be retained during development. 11. Light and Glare c. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Parking lot and exterior security lights,interior building lights, and automobile headlights in the parking areas would occur at night. Glare from building windows and automobile windshields and bumpers would occur during daylight hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. 17 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Control of light dispersion from pole lights and building lights to reduce on-site and off-site glare. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Future informal recreational opportunities are planned for the preserved and dedicated areas and along the P-1 Channel discussed in 4d above. These activities will include foot/jogging trails and exercise stations. The Longacres Race Track is located across I-405 to the South of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Refer to 12a above. The shoreline and trails would be accessible to the public. 18 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An archaeological excavation of a prehistoric Indian living site, sponsored by FCE, was conducted by the University of Washington in 1981. Significant artifacts were removed for study and a report was compiled (James C. Chatters, Project Director, January 15, 1982.Interim report on excavations at Earlington Park to Department of Anthropology and Museum of Man, Central Washington University). The Project Director also indicated no further study was required and that construction and development would not damage the archaeological value of the site but would, in fact, preserve it by not disturbing it further (letter from Jim Chatters to David Schuman,May 12, 1981). c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. The archaeological investigation was concluded. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access for Phase IV will be from SW 7th Street and Oakesdale Ave. SW. Primary access for Phase V will be from SW 7th Street. Vehicle access is provided to and from existing adjacent sites (Phases I and II) leading to Powell Ave. SW to the East. Oakesdale Ave. opens to SW Grady Way which provides access to I-405 and I-5. Refer to Site Plans and Traffic Reports (Traffic Impact Analysis for Valley 405 Business Park, July & August, 1985, Transpo Group). 19 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. The nearest public transit stop is approximately 1/2 mile from the site. New transit routes may be considered as the Corporate Park expands. See EIS on Earlington and Black River office parks. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Phase IV: 690 stalls. Phase V: 225 stalls. Total of 915 stalls. None eliminated. Parking provided according to Renton Building Regulation, Sec. 4-2208, at 1/200 S.F. of gross floor area as defined by Renton Building Regulation Sec. 4-2202.2. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so,generally describe. (indicate whether public or private). The proponent is a 69%participant of a Local Improvement District for Oakesdale Ave.and the balance of construction on SW 7th Street. The section of the LID to be completed by December, 1987 includes SW Seventh Street and Oakesdale Ave. between Grady Way and SW Seventh Street. Refer to the traffic reports for additional details. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No use of these forms of transportation is anticipated; however, Burlington Northern Railroad is located to the North of the site. 20 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The project would generate approximately 4,200 average daily trips,based on 21 trips per 1,000 gross square feet (GSF). PM peak hour traffic of 2.4 trips per 1,000 GSF, or 480 PM peak hour trips (Trip Generation and Informational Report, 3rd edition, 1982,Institute of Transportation Engineers. Peak volumes would occur between 7 and 9 AM and between 5 and 7 PM. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Eight and one-half acres was provided for the right-of-way for Oakesdale Ave, a five-lane major arterial. In addition to participation in the Oakesdale LID,other mitigations included in the traffic study are signalization of the intersections at Powell/Grady Way, and 7th/Hardy. Working with Metro Transit and Commuter Pool, the developer has prepared a Transportation Management Plan to reduce project vehicle trips. The Transportation Management Plan is in place and operating in Phase I,II, and III of the Corporate Park (Guidelines for the Transportation Management Plan of Blackriver Corporate Park -- Renton) 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:fire protection, police protection, health care, schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Buildings with sprinkler systems and private security accommodations. Parking lots will be well lit in accordance with Renton building regulations. 21 16. Utilities a. Circle or underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water. refuse service, telephone. sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Washington Natural Gas Puget Sound Power and Light Renton Water&Sewer Renton Storm Water Utility All utilities have adequate capacity and are available at the site and adjacent streets. Minor excavation would be required for extensions into the site. C. Signature The above answers are t co the best of my knowledge. Signature: Reviewed by R.W. Thorpe, Date Submitted: 22 Exhibit I: Documents Related To Project Site: A. Grading & Fill for Valley 405 Business Park: 1. City of Renton Grading and Fill Permit Application No.SP-100- 86, approved. 2. Renton Shoreline Permit Application No. SM-004-87, withdrawn. 3. Environmental Checklist No. ECF-024-87. B. BlackRiver Corporate Park (BCP) - Phase IV: 1. Renton Site Plan Approval Application No. SA-001-87, withdrawn. 2. Renton Shoreline Permit Application No. SM-001-87, withdrawn. C. BCP Infrastructure (withdrawn from Renton per City's request) : 1. Renton Site Approval Application No. SA-108-86, application withdrawn per City of Renton's request. 2. Renton Shoreline Permit Application No. SM-005-86, application withdrawn per City of Renton's request. D. P-1 Channel, City of Renton: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM-093-81, approved and issued. 2. Renton Special Permit No. SP-060-81. E. Earlington Industrial Park: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM-91-81. 2. Preliminary and Final Plat - WA Technical Center Plat. F. 0akesdale L.I.D., City of Renton: 1. Renton Shoreline Application No. SM-004-81, approved and issued. Exhibit I: Miscellaneous References: A. Letter from First City Equities to City of Renton with enclosure, dated February 23, 1987, pertaining to Site Plan Apprval of Phase IV at Valley 405 Section of property. B. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers (COE). Letters indicating that Valley 405 site was not subject to COE Section 404 (Clean Water Act) jurisdiction. To Barbara Moss, First City Equities, March 4, 1987. To Delton Bonds, Alterra Corporation, December 16, 1985. Exhibit II: Documents related to other adjacent property owned by FCE: A. Rezone: City of Renton, File No. R-057-80. B. E.I.S. for Black River Office Park by Thorpe & Associates, April 1981 DEIS, April 1982 FEIS. C. Grading & Fill. 1. Renton Grading & Fill Permit: Application No. SP-024-86, Permit No. B-12252 issued. 2. Shoreline Application to be submitted. 3. Washington State, Department of Natural Resources, Permit No. F. P. 09-10246 for Forest Practice, issuance date: 3/29/87. D. ADMAC Building 1. Renton Site Plan Approval Application No. SA-057-86, approved and issued. 2. Renton Building Permit Application No. 4236, expired. 3. Renton Variance Application to extend Naches cul-de-sac, No.. V-058-86, denied by Hearing Examiner. Exhibit II: Miscellaneous References. A. Shipe, S.J. and W.W. Scott. 1981. the Great Heron in King County. Washington Game Department, Non-Game Program. With letter of February 12, 1987. B. Letter of Independent Ecological Services to First City Equities of January 31, 1987, pertaining to the Heron Rookery. C. City of Renton Wetlands Study, 1981. D. Letters from Corps of Engineers noting property not subject to the Clean Water Act, Section 404 jurisdiction; December 16, 1985 and March 4, 1987. E. Letter from Barbara Moss of FCE to Don Erickson of City of Renton dated April 10, 1987, regarding Shoreline Designation, with memo from David Morency to Barbara Moss, dated April 13, 1987. F. Department of Ecology - Wetlands Determination dated April 27, 1987. - Architecture and Planning sue, Lemon Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Barbara E. Moss DATE: September 30, 1987 First City Equities 800 5th Avenue, Suite 4170 PROJECT: Phase IV/Phase V Seattle, WA 98101 PROJECT NO: NW87037/NW87038 SUBJECT: Site Plan Review Fees Per my telephone confirmation with Jerry Lind at Renton Planning, the Site Approval Fees are as follows: 1 . Site Plan Review Fee = $368. 50 2. Environmental Checklist Review Fee = $782.91 3. Shoreline Management Permit Fee = $1 ,675.82 Total Submittal Fee $2,827.23 The above fees are based on valuations of $5,920,000 an $1 , 309,000 for Phases IV and V, respectively. Please issue a check to the City of Renton for the total submittal fee above. Do not hesitate to call if there are any questions. lit'. 1 r n4 CITY OF RENTON BY: Y. Ken K. Chin ii,-.,11Cig, 11V1 cc: Jerry Lind OCT 1- 1987 Mark Miller L BUILDING % %ON'NG DEPT. Architecture and Planning Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc., Royce A.Berg,A.I.A., 1127 Pine Street,Suite 300 Seattle,WA 98101 (206)583-8030 �i) L : C l L WI�1rt\ MEMORANDUM �sIH SEP 29 i�J87 I) ±;•,J"•; •-�; '. J, / .`,.,��ii• n ``Tyr TO: Mr. Jerry Lind DATE: September 28, 1987! . I City of Renton Dept. of Planning PROJECT: BCP — Phase 4 & 5 PROJECT NO: NW87037/NW87038 SUBJECT: Site Plan Approval Per our telephone conversation of Friday, September 25, 1987, Site Plan Approval drawings at 1/50th scale will be acceptable for sites over one acre in lieu of 1/40th scale. We also understand that the only difference between the newly revised site plan approval instruction dated October 1986 and the previous instruction sheet dated 11/25/85 is that a list of adjacent owners will be required as part of the submittal. Please accept this as a record of our telephone conversation. BY: Y. Ken K. Chin cc: Barbara Moss Mark Miller