Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA87-100 ,..,. NORT et, , - /illjpilpla .. .. a - . --- . \ • lv...,To e.-2,41.rw,15. ..:„..triiiHod. 4,_,1... ...,, ,o. ----&-:}4er.' vA4:1' .,....p, . r 11 .,„,,, c EKor -111,..r. 2,0026e,re, 2 kuiza aaric,41:42.,, L of.ctr ,1,_ •-,r,Irv1-0.1-ER.pee _ K'i,j/ ,I.. 1 r 3 ( 0,00001 ill i h,ING . • -5 . .,',eali!!2:17-7-:• -'. 0. .94 : . .4 .... ..<:1-in"''!' •"; • ', ,..-‘,. WA , - t g er _.:,' : . , ripailammrSCALE 12 10' . ,- • . 7 I 1'4 .1 ,. ,• 5'LAtb.Ar5 1,- .. )- . • - :,.-fer 1 • % . Arr.,.Lae...1A 0 A .p.:,„,,.r:AA-gri, "IKAik,-,-71,-...,.:.> or•si.v-?:-.....-p, 'r•6:,.-,,,,--Ti ilit4 g - I I I Erz ,ii ---- ----)-1 1-2--1 \ , . B VA,..4,41- C „„,,, -,-4, \... i___,_,, , 4 ' D e-r 1,4a* ita •Et .> ' ' .. G li D A -,, , E ruqn-PkigicL.6. HIN1 td: --- It= i • F I 1 1 t\ G + 1 ,. •at.6i-in-Loa_ , 1...•..:i • '• -: ____ -____ _..zi;-).1 ,j = B ‘\ 9'2,1,44-01,Fr.,-la 144 2ru,t12.2,,efx2,4,et -Arrpox....,-vo,1 or -1.-J H , LE t,:.,t. ---"i \ I__ X--___Y-_ 4:- _' • 1 c •, rL -" %. ' . • I F L ,2..a,12,- 02 Ltfa-rf-f r.,v,o-r-4-1-rx-rci -sr-o.: 1.5,,..,-r -F—pic*. SITE PLAN I(1- ) II I I , • . 7 ADJACENT USES MAP 777:7 + •:::;?'..:1-:-..: ,6riVr c NORTH i'=200' !-!' .fr—1-• • -: 'II') , • . • , -- —- SCHEDULE ' • ,,,,fp. ,,,,-, •• ....• - , , • i,•• . , . „ T • . • -_ - - - 1* COMMON NAME . • SYMBOL U BOTANICAL NAME S/ZE COND.COMMENTS A I .. ,- ,--,-r-rf! . • • . . iI dip 1 ,z,ft,p44,,,,,,,,e,,,eg, ..c.00&rim cr-r.) , Z 13'14-0,- 150 [41-445r- aP . 1 11 CM,• . : .,•••:1 0 it'., . • miliA 1 ,k--r-C•i.....1P.4 I'13,44.....L.' 15,..444, ,119... 22 ,Ils 1-ieu..l'._A-.64-16.1a. - • I t",,t':4' . jk,•....;:..' ' • ' ' ?2- *Cll ily.....,, q i4k., ,,g.'-'14, Pr.-4449-e6g4 51'. 1 ' . ..--'. S , 104.6rk.,6 6•E[7.1‘. -Alitt T34 -F-ru-\ l• CO! 1 t • . 0 • .:/, '3, (;:frila--i-Fr, Tligger#1__ 1 015.4ft,I., .. . . ' , 6,1- Ca ,:e....k.,,,">'' ''`..5.1*. • . , 0 • .i -,,,, . p.a. .;, 1 . tit e I • / . .I 110--°I ' • . I .. ...q.,';':,''' 5 rp...044,-,or--•- •-,--•,,,'07-12,1.,..iir-.0' i a•rF4 L'4114544 1.,..5.6,- 20-I'-'1',...,,IT: r'.....,- re 2 , . . . , . ct•nr,, z-9 fr'r-.4.4;...+....szsgx-.-A'HT Vr.r...1,1' • ri-r.,/ca,60[..A1.1M.. e-Ze ‘..•IT: r.j.,.. if. • 0 u 4:P 14 G.wr,..4, r''''-(74`,e,-115-Plz,(-r-,-,,,i.pilr56) 21.-21' e..,T.IT. • ii,i Fi,re..,,-...- r...4..1ILA,10S,4Lon.•.,,,,,,ri,l, I, I .:,. 1-6,t7e...1-1v1o,'ria-I,IV Es ,_,.„„,,,,,,,,,,,,,*,i.i., ,,,,,,, te oz.. - -- , ,-- --" ,... -, r'-'4...."--7.T.---- ; ,* - N - 1 /'- ."/‘.4''''•- ''''''ILI. • I . .NOltS 1,t, , ...._.....1,_ '4 v es41 1,-4,14/1.14.1.4.-r ,l'i'l...P 4+4,4..,ri..-,1,-...- > PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN &-DRAINAGE PLAN i SKEET. r.20'-0' •• A . L1-1 wORK CM. S- ,yT f N i. ro .`...+` ♦ Tr' I ,Rn 'I., I / a l fall■ m 2 _ ‹.' iR s I if Ci AI g Fr i.1' ., _ t 'ii _ lip A f, II . i VII IVIRillqi 1I 1111 1 f1IIIi j<14' , - ` s = -1 r cea VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION PL/GET ::LEE.• REVISIONS 11 8 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN POWER ^PPONEO N y REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT ROVED T = �,�,.. JD 76 �1: � l 7 1 5 1 s r 11--f, as--6. ---- ‘ 74, 75, ! 1 i EMIIII _1.:I-i.: \ ‘‘ . sime•E' .tr, 0 . 1, . , .. . = .. ...-_-_-_t ., um , . _:L!.. .._. _ , „, •• , _ __.5.4.0 ,,'4 5y-- -- . I z' IJ • Il" y. 3 p �� 11 ° i H . I : ----- ---------H - �L I I . • - - ' li G - 1 w,.. . , It „, I ; ' IZ II 10 , A .I .. I ' I s w 29TN sr0 112zaul *LP ' ' O9 z \' . i i 7 6 I • ' _,\'' _ 1 II I S.W. 30TH ST. eTh ---:- ' , --_ W 31ST ST I 1 . SITE— ' : I _ .r __ I I 1 tT I I � \ ! 1 I I II - t _ I i III' S• W.I 34TH __ STREET 7 I ii- - > .. n 11-1 VICTORIA 'PARK SUBSTATION4:::PP • SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-084-87 • APPLICANT PUGET POWER TOTAL AREA 1.1 ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS EAST VALLEY ROAD EXISTING ZONING M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK) EXISTING USE ' UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION. PROPOSED USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION. COMMENTS LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 2915 EAST VALLEY ROAD (WEST SIDE OF ROADWAY) . I II I I tti CITAPF RENTON sire ma, BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 13, 1988 Andy Padvorac Puget Sound Power and Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue, WA. 98009-9734 Subject: VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION - LANDSCAPING File No. SA-100-87 Dear Mr. Padvorac: The Planning Division of the Renton Community Development Department is in receipt of your letter dated July 6, 1988 regarding a revised landscaping plan for the above referenced project. The revised plan as presented, has now substituted lawn in place of ivy in the southern most driveway that is to be constructed with geoblock. As we understand, it is the desire of Puget Power to avoid the costs associated with presenting a $10,000.00 bond to the City to ensure the survival of ivy if used in the driveway. Since this plan now has the entire driveway planted with lawn, it therefore is no longer necessary to provide said bond to the City. The use of the lawn is acceptable and as illustrated with the drawing submitted, is well integrated with the other plantings in front of the substation. As a result of your decision to make this plant substitution within the geoblock paving, condition No. 2 of the site plan approval decision, file SA-100-87, will be deleted. We will assume then that unless we here back from you this will be acceptable. Because you are also in the process of acquiring the building permit for this project, it will be necessary that you provide the Building Division with two copies of the revised landscaped drawing in order to continue with that review. Please submit these drawings to Dee Beedle of that division. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions regarding this matter. Don . rickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JFL:sr 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 - FtLIG July 6, 1988 Mr. Jerry Lind Land Use Inspector City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: PROPOSED VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION LANDSCAPE PLAN CONFIRMATION REF: File Nos. : ECF-084-87 & SA-100-87 We are in receipt of the Site Plan Approval for this project, wherein the City required a large bond ($10 ,000 ) to ensure the survival of ivy in the reinforced driveway. To avoid the costs associated with the said bond, we are proposing to plant the entire reinforced driveway with lawn. The visual impact of the "lawn driveway" would then be minimized by designing additional areas of lawn adjacent to the said driveway. See attached sketch. Please let me know in the near future whether this design is acceptable,, as I understand that Building Permit issuance is pending only the resolution of this item. You can reach me at 454-6636 , ext. 5177. Athladvorac Land Planner Attachment The Energy Starts Here 20-DC-3273 Puget Sound Power&Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue,WA 98009-9734 (206)454-6363 , : ., _, _ ._ ,_.,r . ... ,... . /. . i, ,,, .,,,,,_ .4, , . ..10 , \ \ ,, - ,, ,, , :.,;,,r, ,,,,,,,,, „..„, • . lept, *- 40,46, ' ' •`�� & .1:v..irlire ,-• T • - , • q. • • O�� \O, -9"'A . \ ,co, , .. ,\ . . . _ .., . .. . \ , ..\\ 4 , ., .. _ _ . ; . .\\ .\ A • �� `, . ', `<=-2 \\ \irwr-t-'"? l'.4 1 _-. ,. \,2 ,. '., 0. i - k i I c-,4, \ , ' ,\ , , 0 44. �( • • * V Itio ,`..s:.,,::",..\:\.,,,, • • - - - - -. ' .• \\\ \\ s ..V.‘k) i • I • • •. - o �I� a i _ - ' ‘.k\, \re•IFF.' • ... , \ ,\O . . . \\.N..,\ .N \'‘ - �, �,. s\. \‘\\ 0r1 0 1 tO W 1: m.u. f � r - . • . I L AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the �(p day of C4UA-Z, , 1988, I deposited in t e mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing Plo.x, "'`""`" rnm`"`e documents. This information was sent to: ov� anc� secA5l tin NAME: ( 1 ex-) 13a c.Il r»o,r\ s h apiVo end A-ssocte , kr Smw t-h 1 ow-c..r. Suu-Fe_ 18I2 50 l0 Se c.or)cl s-c- SIGNED BY: 5ancivo.. K Se ‘Al Pt- tlo¢ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /‘ 7 day of CI Li/n , , 1988 . J �,,,,,�..s___ �,, Es c. eF_ ifboTA ' `•,`,\�9v Ng)��►► Notary Pu is in and for the State of Washington, e •....0. ..... �� residing at per,, , therein. OF WAstlio Project Name and Number: P •Sov r,01 or d Unh"" 6' Co CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM DATE : JUNE 20, 1988 TO : CITY CLERK FROM: BUILDING AND ZONING(SS) SUBJECT : PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY SA-100-87 TRANSMITTED TO YOU IS FILE #SA-100-87 . READY TO BE FILED. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: Puget Sound Power and Light Company LOCATION: Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at a.m. on , 1987, in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after ,receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, both divisions of the Building and Zoning Department, and the Fire, Police, Parks and Policy Developmet Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent, to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received January 26, 1988) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received January 27, 1988) . Exhibit No. 4 Drainage plan (received January 26, 1988) . Exhibit No. 5 Fencing and grading plan (received January ' 26, 1988) . Exhibit No. 6 SPCC curb plan (received January 26, 1987) . FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, and conducted inspections on-site by each member of the Site Plan Review Committee, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Puget Sound & Light Company, has requested site plan approval to allow the construction of an electrical distribution substation on a 1. 1 acre site. The substation is being proposed for the purpose of converting transmission voltage at 115 kV to distribution voltage at 12.5kV. There will be two ..35 foot dead end towers where taps off the Site Plan Review Coxx. ttee Page 2 existing transmission lines terminate. Two 115 kV transformers are proposed. The transformers convert the transmission voltage to 12 .5 kV (the distribution voltage) . Only one of these transformers will be installed at this time and the other one will be installed in the future as demand requires. In addition to. other electrical components, the applicant will be putting in other equipment which will further reduce the voltage for use by customers in the nearby area. 2 . The applicant' s file containing the application, the state Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21C 1971 as amended) , a mitigated Determination of Non-Significance was issued on December 21. 1987, for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, the responsible official. , . The mitigation measures listed in the Determination of Non-Significance were as follows: a. For screening purposes, dense evergreen landscaping consisting of coniferous trees and shrubbery should be provided around the entire perimeter of the new substation. b. Provide 2% natural landscaping, suitable for wildlife habitat. c. That the applicant submit detailed drawings showing a containment area of sufficient size to contain an oil spill and 24 hour/1 day rain storm on site. 4. Section 4-738 (D, l) lists ten criteria that the Site Plan Review Committee is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on site plan: a. General Criteria: 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The Comprehensive Plan Map designation for this property is Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. Areas so designated are intended to be developed with a mix of industrial, service commercial and industrial uses. The utilities goal in the Policies Element of the Comprehensive Plan Compendium states that "Utilities should be well planned, located, designed, constructed, and maintained and should be upgraded where necessary. " Further, one of the implementing policies states "utilities should be designed to accommodate anticipated development of an area. " The subject proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan Utilities goal and policy and the Comprehensive Plan Map designation and intent for development of the property. Finally, two of the policies of the Urban Design Section of the Valley Area Plan state as follows: o "Ample landscaping should be ' provided throughout a developed site, including along property lines, to provide a pleasant environment, minimize the impact of development, and enhance, the visual experience from adjacent properties, including hillsides. " and Site Plan Review Con.--ttee Page 3 k o In addition, landscaped buffers should be established adjacent to public right-of - way, between areas of incompatible land use, and along water channels and wildlife habitats. " Based upon the above policies addressing landscaping and the fact that the Manufacturing Park Zone is one in which developments are to be developed in a park- like/campus-like setting, staff found that the landscaping originally proposed by the applicant needed to be increased. The applicant has revised landscaping plans to reflect staff's concerns. In addition, staff has worked with the applicant on modifying the driveways, either eliminating one of the driveways or using a product such as Geoblock (a reinforced plastic material designed as a panel with open spaces to allow vegetative materials to be planted in these spaces) for one of the driveways. The applicant has also proposed modifying the south driveway by using this same material. The applicant proposes planting English Ivy within the open spaces of the Geoblock panels. The City's Landscape Planner, after reviewing this request, has recommended that grass be used instead of the ivy due to the fact that the ivy would most likely be crushed and killed whenever1heavy equipment would be driven across this driveway (estimated to occur at least annually) . Further, staff found that the use of grass is more in keeping with the front yard landscaping treatment that has been used on other properties in the area where lawn has been used as the dominant goundcover. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject property is designated Manufacturing Park (M-P) on the City's Zoning Map. This designation allows utility distribution facilities as an outright permitted use. The project, as with other uses developed in areas zoned M-P, requires site plan approval as set forth in Section 4-730 (C) 1. Due to the size of the project, the proposal is being reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee rather than the Hearing Examiner. The Manufacturing Park Zone requires that development occur on lots which are a minimum of 35, 000 square feet. The subject project is approximately 1. 1 acres or 47,770 square feet. The applicant is required to provide a sixty (60) foot front yard, and twenty (20) feet for all other yards. The applicant has met or exceeded these requirements according to the City's to the City's Land Use Inspector. 3 . Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The mitigating measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee together with measures discussed above to modify the southern driveway have minimized the potential for adverse impacts on surrounding properties and uses (existing and future) . r//2 Site Plan Review Cor_____ttee Page 4 0 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The applicant's site is essentially flat and does not have any areas which are environmentally sensitive. The proposal should have minimal impacts to the site. The "major" intrusion on the site will be the introduction of approximately 3,000 cubic yards of imported fill material, 600 cubic yards material for preload and 300 cubic yards of gravel surfacing material. The fill material is necessary in order to bring the property up to final grade and to allow compaction of the underlying soils to occur before the project is developed. The site is underlain with poorly drained organic soils at this time. This is overlain by six feet of granular fill that was applied to the site in the early 1980 's. The new fill added to the site will further compact the soil so as to minimize future settling of the ground once the project is constructed. 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The proposal is not expected to adversely impact property values in the immediate area. As noted above, the proposed use is consistent with the permitted zoning in the area. 6. Safety and efficiency of 'vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The project as designed provides safe and efficient service vehicle access. General vehicular and pedestrian access is not a factor with this particular project. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; This criterion does not actually apply to this project since the project is not intended to house people. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; The project is not expected to create noise or odor impacts which need to be mitigated. Some background electrical humming may occur because of the nature of the facility. The proposal does pose a potential unhealthy condition in the event of a transformer oil spill. The applicant has mitigated this potential problem by submitting a Spill . Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (the SPCC plan) which includes an oil/water separator in the design of the drainage system. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and The project will not create a burden on public services and facilities. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. As noted above, the project will not lead to the deterioration and blight of the neighborhood. 5. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. • Site Plan Review Committee Page 5 6. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option. 7. The site plan as presented provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. Conclusions: 1. The proposal as modified by the mitigation measures imposed by the Environmental Review Committee appears to be consistent with policies, specifications, and codes of the City of Renton. 2. Specific issues raised by various City departments focus on: a. Potential transformer oil spills. b. Landscaping and design of driveways. 3 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option and the present zoning classification of Manufacturing Park `(M-P) . Decision: The site plan, file SA-100-87, for Puget Sound Power and Light Company be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with the mitigation measures listed in the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated issued for the project on December 21, 1987. 2. That the southern driveway be developed with a combination of Geoblock panel underlays and grass for the first twenty (20) feet from the street property line and then planted with an ivy overlay for the remaining portion subject to: a) a $10,000 bond being provided to remove and replace this, and the thirty (30) feet of ground cover to the north, to lawn if it is determined by the City's landscape planner that the ivy has not held up after a test being conducted during the first nine (9) months after installation. During this test a typical service vehicle of the type that would remove transformers shall be driven over the ivy so that the City's landscape planner can determine within the next three (3) monthly its , recoverability. 3 . That the first twenty (20) feet (excluding the treed and shrubbed sideyards) of the front yard be landscaped with grass sod, and that, depending upon the outcome of the ivy recoverability test, identified above, an additional thirty (30) feet of grass landscaping (for a total depth of fifty (50) feet) be provided if the ivy ground cover is found unsuitable because of its inability to quickly recover from service vehicle activity over it. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Note to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-dayappeal for work which may consequently be stopped b pan appeal period and/orw rk required to be altered or returned to itsypreconstruction o tate state, Site Plan Review Con_ _.ttee Page 6 ORDERED THIS 3rd, day of June 1988, on behalf of the Site Plan Review Committee. A44442L Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED THIS 3rd day of June, 1988 to the parties of record:. Puget Sound Power and Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue, Washington 98009-9734 Andy Padvorac OBC-11N P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue, Washington 98009-9734 TRANSMITTED THIS 3rd day of June, 1988, to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Nancy Mathews Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry Springer, Policy Development Dir. Ronald Nelson, Building and Zoning Dir. Members of the Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011 (B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on June 24 , 1988 . The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. „ 0 CITY OF RENTON ••LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor - Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM DATE: May 5, 1988 • TO: File FROM: Jerry Lind SUBJECT: Puget Power Substation-Geoblock Landscaping System 2915 East Valley Road File SA-100-87 Puget Power has proposed using Geoblock in their landscaping in front of the proposed substation in order to minimize the effect of having two driveways constructed for the purpose of maintenance of the station. In April, Puget provided this office on loan, a video tape tape that illustrates the effectiveness of using geoblock in landscaping. This example was with a Boeing building on East Marginal Way where the geoblock was used with -ivy on a berm mounting a sign. In my opinion, the geoblock is an acceptable method of providing a reinforced surface that can be camouflaged within the landscaping. With the specific use of the geoblock at the Victoria Park substation, I would recommend that lawn be used with the geoblock instead of ivy as proposed by Puget. Lawn will stand up better to vehicles driving upon it (especially heavy maintenance vehicles) while the ivy would likely by crushed. The lawn in front of the substation would also look better and would blend in with the neighboring developed properties which have included lawn as their dominant front groundcover. puget JFL 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 I / 1 ELLCr 4 y ET CITY OF RENTON 5 .[ILECiEOVE3 April A 1988 APP 71988 Mr. Donald K. Erickson BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION SITE PLAN REVIEW AMENDMENT OF MARCH 16 , 1988 LETTER Please consider the second paragraph of Section C.1 of the subject letter to be amended as shown below. This amendment of the ivy planting spacing was discussed with Jerry Lind of your office on March 31 , 1988 . "The Geoblock would be planted with ivy at /IA 12 inches on center, the ivy being provided in 4 inch pots with at least three 6 inch runners , each of which would be pinned to the ground once . " Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding the above amendment at 454-6363 , ext. 5177 . 4'4'6 fsetAARSIA-C.....e Andy Padvorac Land Planner ATP:bsw Enclosures The Energy Starts Here 45 do 5760 Puget Sound Power&Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue,WA 98009-9734 (206)454-6363 INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: DATE: FILE MARCH 28, 1988 FROM: at JERRY LIND SUBJECT: SUBSTATION-EAST VALLEY ROAD FILE .# SA-100-87 Andy Padvoric of Puget Power called today with an example of where "geoblock" has been used in landscaping as they which to use with their new substation. . It has been used with the Boeing Development Center on East Marginal Way. It was used around a bermed sign:ias an. element to raise the sign for both aesthetics and slope control . Ivy was used around the sign with the blocks and this was done approximately two years ago. ice, ;; March 16 , 1988 HAND DELIVERED Mr. Donald K. Erickson • -a "' 6 1 ' ti.<.•.3 ZoningAdministrator `` ) ' Li ' ¢ ' ") City of Renton L r'Idi f 10 ) 200 Mill Avenue 'Y�' �� -✓ Renton, WA 98055 L ,., SUBJ: VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION SITE PLAN REVIEW This letter is in response to a telephone call from Mr. Jerry Lind, of your office , on February 22, 1988 . During that call, Jerry indicated that the City' s Site Plan Review Committee (SPRC) wanted to know whether the subject substation could operate with only one driveway onto East Valley Highway, and if not, then why? Jerry also indicated that, should we need two driveways, the City would want one of the driveways constructed with something like reinforced lawn to improve the aesthetics of the facility. Two avenues of access into the fenced substation are needed since: A. DRIVEWAYS , ONE OR TWO? The substation is designed to be double banked, that is, to have two transformers with their associated equipment. 1 . Reliability Reliable service to our customers is maintained by enabling half of a double banked substation to continue to be energized while the other half is worked on by our crews . This is only possible if access is provided to each side of the facility. 2. Equipment Installation & Removal Installation and removal of the large pieces of substation equipment requires a crane along with a low-boy truck to be adjacent to the subject equipment' s near side . With a double banked substation, this requires two driveways, one next to each transformer. 3. Maintenance Routine substation maintenance , inspection and operation only requires one driveway - the northerly one. The Energy Starts Here 13 do 5760 Puget Sound Power&Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue,WA 98009-9734 (206)454-6363 Donald K. Erickson March 16, 1988 Page 2 Major substation maintenance which requires both driveways (due to the numerous support vehicles required to be present) would not occur under normal circumstances more often than annually. Thus, two driveways are needed inside of the substation' s fence, although the southerly one would be used occasionally at most. B. CURB CUTS, ONE OR TWO? 1 . Site Requirements In some instances , the two driveways exiting the fenced substation can join together before meeting the public roadway, requiring only one curb cut. The controlling factor here is whether the site is deep enough for the driveways to be designed with radiuses compatible with our large equipment, such as low-boy trucks . This site is not deep enough for this driveway configuration. 2. Reliability Puget' s obligation to provide reliable electrical service prudently suggests that there be two points of access to our substations . If one driveway is blocked , say by an abandoned vehicle, or becomes otherwise unusable, Puget crews must have immediate access to the substation equipment in the case of an outage or other emergency. Thus two driveways and two curb cuts are needed for this substation. C. AESTHETICS. - LANDSCAPING To satisfy the City' s concern with the aesthetics of our substation' s driveways, we propose a reinforced driveway surface planted with English Ivy, rather than grass, as described below: 1 . South Driveway The substation' s south driveway would be constructed using Geoblock, which is a reinforced plastic and is black in color. See attached copy of product literature. The Geoblock would be planted with ivy at 18 inches on center, the ivy being provided in 4 inch pots with at least three 6 inch runners , each of which would be pinned to the ground once . 13 do 5760 Donald K. Erickson ` March 16, 1988 Page 3 The Geoblock would not have any ground bark on it since: ( 1 ) using bark is not recommended by the manufacturer, and ( 2) the ivy must be pinned directly into the soil . 2 . Front Yard English Ivy would be planted in front of the the substation, instead of the previously specified Kinnickinnick, for consistency with the south driveway. These plants would be spaced at 18 inches on center and provided in one gallon pots with at least three 12 inch runners, each of which would be pinned to the ground once. Ground bark would be spread throughout this planting area to a depth of 3 inches . 3 . Other Yards The side and rear yards would be planted with Kinnickinnick where our plan previously specified Cowberry. Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding the above responses at 454-6363 , ext. 5177 . Ansf‘eliN( FC‘441•11 Andy Padvorac Land Planner ATP/bsw ®ones Attachment 13 do 5760 • " -. I 02275/PRE BuyLine 3441 ' CAT 0 .-- all' ` _- • -; 1111 IL .0., ..4,.. , )..,,i,.. ., =,,,..-0 . , -----:-------- :4:7 --■ •••=m---1 3 44 A a " 1 '-:' '''' —'''...-.. --',-----9 •:. ,ON N - k',._.•.e.:.� •- • • . - ., : (41„ l'Irf° • r„, .,ram:- w.:„ai�?r v 1- ! ••: ' i a V : . 5l • - -- - _ M1•:r=- - 'Tim JS~iiw�J-'._ 1 + .'v�t t• , 11. o._ ia�,•• V, '4 c:. . rr }� x t-'�`' 4t/1 0 KVC'3 'l4r IV.11ea4 AISA ft iN . ' 8t 4,. I iii. !x,WA'LUNgi441N a, '. `:, '1.' • •4.1 ',,lli 1 ' i'.11.,F= - ' ••e. s,. •�9 E3 . N. •, -h ,1:: i / :,. G=1 -A, /1 • • x - • �^"r .•., -;.• E�-. . i: 7 ;rTo;•_ i, 1IL. �h :l�1 I--?;, I0o 'SFr.., >T.n�-;El:, p ;'c i•.Ts 417 _ '-' s Ci ,5t- .; ,�` +ht . &'s . ..ct' -¢]'�.. ' - .mot, M f+p g„c fit" .t•• v- .• f"` f » i.- '-r 6zt ri"• ; 1P. 'Ott '•. ,c a -_i / 7 rr+ 0> :.. t.\••_.Ma: in. R .Mi..1"" 43,1 S. •_C!• as ..I�. ' .'G fi..- --•t;.... n .:.'',• • 't--r - ` • _ -� '.11:4.. a 40 o aa-, C14•YAM Mra 'Rs ao a•�.-:ts''- ., • ..o. 6. _Q d ep ..r4'4-=i •L"V Ate® Q Ye_ X 6?.•w• !•4br.04. sr' .r. ab•'4 e o ....` __.•.', to --air .0. ....ti" - o ar _ •..'S:"S. _ . 0' The INDESTRUCTIBLE LAWN by '��'" i„ i i i , i „ i,,, , i , _ , , ,, rt � 'uT a� �a I` ', j `b LANDSCAPING SYSTEM 7/ '. .; •_: 1, i s 9� r. ', The GEOBLOCK„ Landscaping System by .,=, •i•, ••F; PRESTO provides invisible support for pedestrian � e: = 1 - • ;+-C - ', 1 and.vehicular traffic.while maintaining a thick cover of grass K , ! ', , r , �••,li ,, . The-strong, reinforced plastic GEOBLOCK ',I,,,,,,-,:,.,: ipl 1 , 1 ;, 14 , features. . . t �'`. z `' ` , • • ; f ., ti •Interlockin system for maximum weight-load transfer *, ,; , e ir.k. ;. •Easy installation, lightweight can be cut I r�� rG� . ,, ,,f - with a hand saw `;.;+i.��r-5 #/ . "•-•,•":1..-'•,'•XL:- 1 i '!1;• - � ;` ,� •Resistant to chemicals, fertilizers and temperature extremes •c,1�*•"• -x a �,�x�`1 1 •Two sizes available. . .r heavy duty use ii,s . . �' = ` �/�jv» 1-1/8' light duty use P-sr.• E:;Jii''''. .i.4.36V,e.. '7'-'5;i:';'t:jiliit,++yyam',` C,�t Cd.w1"�Y�ti1e • H.D..FOWLER rIe ;�C-;, "3's�' L1,R1;ui►I a` '' ',,;��Y1,i1 'ill,r,11 14 CO., INC f';Yc ' 11.n y ':s t1` ==-13440 S.E.30th St.g . Post Office Box 160 C. %VC - �A '' Bellevue,WA 9800d____Bellevue,WA 98009 �^ (206) 746-8400 A GEOSYSTEMS PRODUCT : TM • .4' ,r;`' 1,,V.,1-41. A `'J' i1 f �Z.�',I/(/• ads' a_" `` ti i `5_ f� :• 41)y ,s 'r •, '" of>.a;t :; E — -.s: ;_ ' ..• ,.fix t =- '">�1J,S,'o+ � u•F+"�3"y Y• + Y.*...,., `iy ..-'tn"".,• :I i ,7k .2rub-Ar',._ 1 . J- 5v'r If'f-s ::a h.,., 1!� ' �/ 'r` .. 1.: -7y'?1'4i` ''.+''.rsi;Ja,-^ kc Sc,} g6-f•�'.w:.�+• JL 4 4,�k Jx+-'.° ...'.�to i-- ;- ~. i• .t 1�' :42• r"" Yy;.: {x 1,.. .4•]ati' 4) ,', ark A n,,- rlx r , 1 J • _ .tC ,tt�, �. } •,�� , =• ,...,: - f4 k; ,,,fF .t , r,,r L0.,,,j 5"l,-0, r x� t r' ''^ '_" r'�-s,---- y� L-+." „•�' ,:?. - rita,. ..• • _" 5-.A.,,,,..„ �,rA-, t 1i i�,. +tit,...„:a „ ,:,ti r,^-,,,„-. •'�„..,...,-,:.-....,-.:•„.....,,,,,..,,„:„...._'` • � _ - y y; lx=:'':. t,ua y N L u4 r, ,,1 '?.r � t:P r r '}, ^ - . •,..,C s -Y. rt„ .. "Tw``"" 4 ar".1:.r k:,c, i ., °i C..' -r A ,1*t.✓�t't f 7-/'7t .i i.1 ..it: •4 ?•- E i ,.,. .ram, t � + i��r �< > t ••-+7� L.!,- 'n 4V• g .�:� -?r' Yj ,,i�'e'l 7; ., �S , } k''t,""'y t 4 t :i - ire A---r,r.,.�. \ .i: .3,Qt-t. 9^) -". y✓i-• ='a" 9-+!Xr , et; `'4 ^:. ^rih.,5 . 17. ra - .'. '- .,y P+i 17;: ' 'x:,,,P iy`::;� br)�'I .U�.rr g'./• } r{+y i s}� L h r�yv;�t �l i 6.4 t 2 5 +' f:K j�•. 4r : 'e'. <, - r y ,,,. S ;,: } �'f i`+ r., ,r-N.. S• ^K+t e"tr^'a,,N l sr ., i r f)ih.,,,l.c Y 6,•�. ar +. .. {"�`:5,.. .:E-`'•'•. -?' ..��Yt'✓��;>. !!}t•..5 �5�`. ,.e'.-J?..C.3. +':7X�f:, .,"): ..-x ....f'� ��..ht r +a� r., et'r , . :t.: .+r''- •PARKING.LOT Forest Waters Development San Antonio, TX Ny ley 1 4,.-..* T, I„ - a3 S +c 5+r1 l,ti3 } !i I I l l 41 -- J'p `..h I .,7, i lr r, 11,11111 o _: • \,. 2gr,x ,VI , ti.1.1,i' : • IB •11, I i _ft� �aE'11. _ �� 5�� ,, ,.- �t 1 " lei ii, . • ... ,—....=-!,.1------k- --,:- ..::-;::, •• 1,; ,.,,..+- ,„.�'.' `•' ems• • - = ` �" • ,w F `•;'y,,q ram`•4 . { ,+y'-�rvri'''i+t t y tZ . A t t'+w r"te..4•„ i t!1-s�C r JT'r -Y.- -A.,:. F I S y a . r l' '� .c„ r �^ Y+� r^•,.Lam, Cx,{_—•ns1 J 5 t$ -T'! ¢.1.� —. ..`�fr`7 •}' r. - r r,5 —41 i r Wr •w "r , . G, , 4,c 4, i S,aq 1•,,,-s/y rr "1v+ce41. 7e t"tiyt _ yt•.y ,. e^ S L J 1 h _ • fia It cMi'Ym t;. yex r��'A`t'( • l-x, t•}41,; �l A Jtf , L y 5 5•^ 1'J 4� ..rr •s.,•'s•,,vy .',4_� 'J'� ''w fi 1 y ;sk V r,'-y)�.:4, t , ,u..zr- , A',.,k-S,E, �h r c i 3x r +��. �, / i. ,ti,f 2� j" 1 C J It� yuR{r1 O _�- `• fYh FW..{ya'�{ t. )M1.r• �-hF xS• C'>C"Wyk a"�,. ma` t ,, f✓ t r x#ti a .5 x 7 ,'t , �... 111,P r '.-,0,;,rY;4',' r a i . , •,•.. :, r f/ <\ ,: s.t}f + Rv"t� I J':rn¢)v�v '.*":0 : i:i x� ,,,•„,P. t•i+ 4.4i �,,. 'b-M.' '.+hat• .' h it� x'r".":.. S + ' ,x,', a `.f )'��k' -af d t�^Yr+ywx r) l>,.� y,iq,74 ;.i.:',.., ;5 t4• PT�t '1 ' 4.;.'if S w,rz*'cn .,.wh. , e. ,,• . •, • t : ,yk.-�,'J{1, �c.,r G� %fin° t t'�'t.1isr'i,,'`z ' FIRELANE ACCESS DRIVE. APPROACH TO FOOTBRIDGE Logarr Airport Boston, MA Marriott's Camelback Golf Course Scottsdale AZ. Standard Heavy Duty Standard GEOBLOCK GEOBLOCK GEOBLOCK 36 x 12 x 1'/e Specifications: SS 360 SS 363 7 Dimension of GEOBLOCK—Nominal(Inches) 36 x 12 x 11/e 36 x 12 x 2 f Color - Charcoal or Green Charcoal �• -. •' ..0' .` Material Fiber Reinforced d Fiber Reinforcedd i r• t • Weight per block(pounds) 7 13.5 •' • Coverage per block—Nominal(Square Feet) 3 3 ' Cell Size 48 cells/blk.(Inches) . 234 x 234 21/2 x 23/s Open Area Top of Block(%) 78 68 Heavy Duty GEOBLOCK Open Area Bottom of Block(%) 21 21 36 x 12 x 2 Runoff Coefficient(%) ' 25-30 25-30 - - Interlock Between Blocks 2/1 Tongue&Groove 3/2 Tongue&Groove - Chemical Resistance Superior Superior • Flexural Modulus at 73°F(PSI) 35,000 35,000 .. • Crushing Strength(PSF) 144,000 144,000 • • • • IP s PRESTO PRODUCTS,INCORPORATED Applications �°. T.M. GEOSYSTEMS DIVISION • Golf Cart Path Shoulders and Aprons ill P.O.Box 2399,Appleton,WI 54913 • •-Driveways, Driveway Shoulders or Medians • 1-80a-558-3525 Ext. 311 - • Auxiliary Parking In Wisconsin 414-739-9471 Ext.311 • • Pedestrian Walkways GEOBLOCK Landscaping System is a registered • Emergency Access Lanes trademark of Presto Products,Incorporated • Highway Median Crossovers and Waysides • Around Monuments,Statues&Fountains ©COPYRIGHT-1985 PRESTO PRODUCTS,INCORPORATED- • Approaches onto and Sidelines of Athletic Fields Printed in U.S.A. uunnnnttnttnnuunnnl GEOBLOCK® I NSTALLATIOr INSTRUCTIONS • LANDSCAPING SYSTEM i BASE PREPARATION: 1. Soil should be dry and free draining. nf® 2. Excavate area allowingfor block thick- OVA ,�nm��'� � ness,. less 1/4" for settling. m r�'„%y�'1 '.....„T•,,,,'�','', ,,. 3. Base should be uniformly graded, leveled, co' rt. "�ti'' z..—.-.�l st y` and cleared of foreign objects (large . `3n 'IlI it' stones, pine cones, etc.). This enables the blocks to interlock and remain immobile after installation. .- IN 4. Subbase support guidelines - pavement GEOB�ocic—► 1"Sand/Soil/Fertilizer_� strength is determined by the support pro- Leveling course oob`: �,•"'60o a:" o:`; vided by the subbase. The subbase po /y3•• '• •o?i'•q0••;°. 4"-10"Crushed Stone• ,•o;09i�• ••• •.o• •4. •.0 strength is commonly measured by the Z c o.a,,cpo0:o•0 •� Civil Engineering standard, California r °____ __ °•••°`.. Existing Soil Sub-base ' ` r � ttvA�s;;. � :iw Bearing Ratio (CBR), and ranges from ._,d�.+ ';a..:.r�;,t�..,ie��.�•, 0-100. For further information contact your manufacturer's representative. *Resulting in a subbase with CBR>_7 BLOCK INSTALLATION: 1. Maximum load bearing capacity is 3. The tongue-in-groove interlock is achieved achieved by staggering blocks and, where by sliding the blocks together. possible, by placing them perpendicular 4. Blocks can easily be cut with a hand or to traffic flow. Block should be placed power saw to custom fit contours or with round hole down. obstructions. 2. To prevent the blocks from shifting during installation, place first blocks against a stationary edge or secure with stakes. F-Wrgiel_ _- z} - -rs ----- yam.- ; . 1,� i=-= �i�near -- __1�� I ® R't t a i' +r3.- - • '- ®�. t FINISHING PROCEDURE: 1. Backfill with suitable soil allowing 1/4" To sod: Sweep out 1/2" dirt and place of space from the soil to the top of the . sod. Roll 3 times with a standard lawn GEOBLOCK. roller. Water thoroughly and follow , To seed: Follow normal seeding normal sod care. procedures. While most seed grasses 2. After turf has been established, block are acceptable, rye and bluegrass have visibility is minimal, even with frequent performed well. traffic. "` 5-: Y. .,.• Yy -: , _ _, r;.1++ e�i�- r... ; �}+�,•,x Via, '1,� x �rff�'' y -.� -``5L r - I, ; r ;t t) y7\:t' u ..,t , .4:: 0•Fgr,c" mweal t y rrl `,, vt• 1 , •t'" a „o... cy`✓ 3-•: y: {1. ti , -.yy' _..___ =-. •utuBLZIGK is a-frademark of PRESTO PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED• .. Presto Products,Incorporated,GEOSYSTEMS Division,P.O.Box 2399,Appleton,WI 54913 Toll Free 800-558-3525•Regular No.414-739-9471 nunnnnnnunnunnnm CEOBLOCK® INSTALLATIOP INSTRUCTIONS LANDSCAPING SYSTEM BASE PREPARATION: 1. Soil should be dry and free draining. � ��;� 2. Excavate area allowingfor block thick- ��ry� '"�� Hess,. less 1/4" for settling. �pss.,, �„%' '"." ,r ";,4 3. Base should be uniformly graded, leveled, r0' `"'0 ®`a..!'1 °I''`'• 1k'�I , iw•'�- and cleared of foreign objects (large '�n''ul. !4 • stones, pine cones, etc.). This enables the blocks to interlock and remain immobile after installation. 4. Subbase support guidelines - pavement GEOBLOCK--IP. ..m...... ..:.: , 1"Sand/SoiUfertilizer_i strength is determined by the support pro- Leveling Course o;tl000a a' '60.0;0: 'o: vided by the subbase. The subbase _ p;°��y.,,•�•' .ao.°q�,�r•j•;°, strength is commonly measured by the 4"-10•-Crushed Stone ,o;0 .o do•• .•• o• 'o. •.0i Civil Engineering standard, California d �� Existing Soil Sub-base�. • r �1 Y'i';•.nr+�� .it Bearing Ratio (CBR), and ranges from ..�.`�. �....��;:.;�e�,.•�.w.� 0-100. For further information contact your manufacturer's representative. •Resulting in a subbase with CBR?7 • BLOCK INSTALLATION: 1. Maximum load bearing capacity is 3. The tongue-in-groove interlock is achieved achieved by staggering blocks and, where by sliding the blocks together. possible, by placing them perpendicular 4. Blocks can easily be cut with a hand or to traffic flow. Block should be placed power saw to custom fit contours or with round hole down. obstructions. 2. To prevent the blocks from shifting during installation, place first blocks against a stationary edge or secure with stakes. �B, fir_ > -�1 n y ,� �\�.r or: 4griff� fA/tJ ' � ' ~"• am'" r ,„.: \ } kr. " � y ace `a a «`� , FINISHING PROCEDURE: 1. Backfill with suitable soil allowing 1/4" To sod: Sweep out 1/2" dirt and place of space from the soil to the top of the sod. Roll 3 times with a standard lawn GEOBLOCK. . . roller. Water thoroughly and follow , To seed: Follow normal seeding normal sod care. procedures. While most seed grasses 2. After turf has been established, block are acceptable, rye and bluegrass have visibility is minimal, even with frequent performed well. traffic. ^ti r, <: • . '•S ' fY i,"ifi < • 1.• 7 j T' ii ea' `�.. ,. ?"' .L r „ , ;:. •�S�r1 .moo •rk . a '-ix• 1. �:-,r ., Y`.•Ipa r h -011111.111// .y � i- G: • " - y .. •I-. .: ' s'x r '.!�' �.�% . "ti,"._ ' ii--. 'A,u T-. .,_ "-_. V,Yr=y`y �'Z S y. t:,:Z - \ ,,,,:, .,_:;;;:if: GEOEBLOCK its a trademark of PRESTO PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED Presto Products,Incorporated,GEOSYSTEMS Division,P.O.Box 2399,Appleton,WI 54913 Toll Free 800.558-3525•Regular No.414-739-9471 PU ET POWER CITY c ,- RCNTOi� February 23 , 1988 o 088 t- L., fMr. J ce Public uWorks ck 1Department / ZONING DEPT. City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: Shuffleton Complex Drainage-Stormwater Run-off System Improvements Zoning/Permitting Inquiry Additional Information On February 17 , 1988 , I sent the City of Renton a letter, with a conceptual drawing , for the purpose of clarifying permit requirements for the subject improvement project. Last Friday you telephoned me in response to that letter and requested another copy of the conceptual drawing for your record. That drawing in enclosed for your use. You also requested that Puget consider granting the City of Renton an easement for the large drainage channel on the east side of the property, by the entrance driveway. As I mentioned in our telephone conversation, this easement was prepared in conjunction with a previous project at the site. Enclosed for acceptance by the City of Renton is the said Drainage Easement, signed by Puget on October 10 , 1983 . Please send a copy of the recorded easement to my attention. Please feel free to call me with any additional questions regarding this project at 454-6363 , ext. 5177 . Alf\Avd VC Andy Padvorac Land Planner ATP/bsw Enclosure cc: Mr. Don Erikson, City of Renton Zoning Administrator 15 do 5760 The Energy Starts Here Puget Sound Power&Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue,WA 98009-9734 (206)454-6363 u ArPagOffe January 27 , 1988 Mr. Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 SUBJ: Victoria Park Substation -Environmental Review • This letter is in response to your December 21 , 1987 letter which transmitted a Determination of Non-Significance with three mitigation measures for the subject project. Jerry Lind, from the City of Renton, met with Mary Merker, this project' s landscape architect, and me us on January 6 , 1988 and discussed these measures. The first two measures deal with landscaping of the site . In response to these measures and our meeting with Jerry, the landscape plan has been revised so that a dense evergreen screen is provided around the entire perimeter of the substation, consisting of coniferous trees and shrubbery. This current plan will consist of at least 2% natural landscaping suitable for wildlife habitat. Therefore , enclosed for review and approval are four copies of the following landscape plan: "Conceptual Landscape Plan," sh. L1-1, rev. 1-21-88 . The third measure requires, "That the applicant submit detailed drawings showing a containment area of sufficient size to contain an oil spill and 24 hour/1 day rain storm on site. " It is our understanding that our existing design meets this requirement as illustrated on the following four sets of plans: 1 . Drainage Plan, #D-5175 , sh. 1-2 , rev. 2. 2. Grade & Fence , #D-5174 , sh. 1-2, rev. 2. 3 . SPCC Curb, #D-5183, sh. 1 of 1, rev. 1 . Please feel free to contact me with any questions regarding the above responses at 454-6363 , ext. 5177 . Andy Padvorac Land Planner ThegEnergy6tarts Here 10 do 5760 Puget Sound Power&Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue,WA 98009-9734 (206)454-6363 .. AK. .Y as ;; . E . k Tu. APPLICATION NO. ECF-084-87; SA-100-87 APPLICANT SUBSTATION) SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (VICTORIA PARK =. SUBSTATION) PROPOSED ACTIONAPPLICATION FOR A SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATION ON 1 .1 ACRE . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 2915 EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY. POSTED TO N'•; TIWY 1NTERESTE!' t- ERS3I,NS OF AN ENVIRONMENT1r L AOTO{%N. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CORD ITTEE (E.R.CO) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES f DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE. ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL N. T BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAM! ,ER BY 5:00 P.M., .JANUARY 25, 1988 FOR FURTHE ' INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONM ,l A, DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW C 0MM' 1 1 r .3"�e r ,being first dulysworn on oath states RENTON,WASHview N y g The Environmental Review Corr that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the (ERC) has issued a Determination or SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the Ing project(s) under the authority cr the Renton Municipal Code. The i,ppllcant(s) VALLEY DAILY NEWS have completed a mitigation pro pursu- ant to WAC 197-11-350. • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition PUGET SOUND POWER A .J LIGHT COMPANY (VICTORIA PARK SUBSTA- Daily newspapers published six (6)times a week.That said newspapers TION) Application for a site pla approval are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six to construct an electrical distrit ` r ub- months prior to the date ofpublication referred to,printed and published station Easton Valley acre. Propertyay. Fil I a- 25��; Highway. File Nos. ECF- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King 084-87 and SA-100-87.Further information County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Buildog, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. King County. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner , Renton Edition ;� , Auburn Edition and not in by Punuar blish 25, 1988. ( Published in the Valley Daily News Janu- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers ary 11, 1988 R2740. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a : otica of Environmental Determination was published on January 11, 188 :t274J The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $13 .2 0 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 3 t Il day of J as ua r y19 3 3 Notary lic for the State of Washington, ff residing at Federal Way, ; �� I1=1 King County, Washington. t I VDN#87 Revised 11 86 r ,U L. V U BU: : / ZONING DEPT. 1 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY (VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION) Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway. File Nos. ECF-084-87 and SA-100-87. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2540. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by January 25, 1988. Published: January 11, 1988 .516 7 CONFERENCE REPORT NAME OF PROJECT: O1G ZwA ?AN< LtBD)Olson) DATE OF CONFERENCE: I to -85 PROJECT NUMBER: 36 I o0- 61 TIME: 2 . 30 (CART) (END) NAME AND TITLE OF ORGANIZATION PHONE PEOPLE_ATIENDING 6eRRI L I Nho• ZConpIrVCa 2.35- Z55O -\4 ?( A 64- PO GO'U ' 4-54—Lo 3(o 1 x - S 17 7 COMMENTS: D ISLDS 10'0 V. o1=ksR.011V[e ratoeteick LoPtoOsGApJ)V , NWpson Sue: c1P-ttoff r 2 *METROOF RENTON Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle CITY II v Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 ® ' JAN 4►:T December 30, 1987 7( NG f'E PT, Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Environmental Review Committee Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No: SA 100-87 Puget Sound Power and Light Company Dear Mr. Erickson: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, regory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:ldg OF R4,4/ 4$ ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON — DIRECTOR iaLl 1/4, ,9 a MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 � 0,9gTFD SEPSc_x* BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Review Division METRO 821 2nd Avenue, M.S. #92 Seattle, WA 98104 RE:Puget Sound Power and Light Company, 2915 East Valley Highway Dear Mr. Bush: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-084-87 and SA-100-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550 . Sincerely, Dona d K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs OF R& �$ ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR NAL 0 �' � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540� 0E0 SEPI0,0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Andy Padvorac P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 RE: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, 2915 East Valley Highway Dear Mr. Padvorac: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-084-87 and SA-100-87. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs OF 1 A A. v 4 Q ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR p9 �" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O94TO SEPZ .t. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Mr. Gerald W. Marbett Building and Land Dev. Div. 450 King County Admin. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, 2915 East Valley Highway Dear Mr. Marbett: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-084-87 and SA-100-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, d Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs OF R4,4 A. �� © 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z NA o 09 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 O,i)-97-FD SEP�E�0�P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Puget Sound Power and Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 RE: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, 2915 East Valley Road Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated and Mitigation Measures for application for site plan approval, file nos. : ECF-084-87 and SA-100-87. If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs tf (A) OF I A. %6 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR i. 09 ammo MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 09it, SEPS� ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR December 21, 1987 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 RE: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, 2915 East Valley Highway Dear Sirs: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for application for site plan approval , file nos. : ECF-084-87 and SA-100-87 . If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550. Sincerely, , f Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Enclosure DE:cs NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL. DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. CF-084-87, SA-100-87 , APPLICANT PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT (VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION) PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR A SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATION ON 1 . 1 ACRE . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2915 EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY . POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES [ c DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL Lç I WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY 5 :00PM JANUARY 4, 1988 . AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. V)21 ° Aj NotEnvDet/Dskl VicPark NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT (VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION) Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway, File Nos. : ECF-084- 87, SA-100-87. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 P.M. January 4 , 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2540. Published: December 21, 1987 J S/067 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance — Mitigated for the following project(s)under the authority of the Renton Audrey Balmer ,being first duly sworn on oath states Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT (VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION) VALLEY DAILY NEWS Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substa- • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition tion on 1.1 acre. Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway, File Nos.: ECF-084- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers 87,SA-100-87. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published January 4, 1988, will not be considered. A rn- in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kingfourteen llo) day appeal period will cNS. gKent, mence following the finalization of DNS. County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal The mitigation measures imposed by the newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and King County. Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton,Washington. Phone 235-2540. Published in the Valley Daily News Dec. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition 21, 1987.R2684. , Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Notice of ::nvironmental Determination was published on December 21, 1987 R2684 • The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 22 .4U • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 3rdday of De c 19-8 7 Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, C;i i Y C'= RENTON King County, Washington.VDN#87 Revised 11/86 (' I I . 9 V E n\ - ' FEB k. 31988 I J BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. NotEnvDet/Dskl VicPark NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON ti The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT (VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION) Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. 'Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway, File Nos. : ECF-084- 87, SA-100-87. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 P.M. January 4, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2540. Published: December 21, 1987 -457067 l'CLUAA) l . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-084-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-100-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power and Light Company LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from December 21, 1987. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , January 4, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmenta3. Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2500 DATE OF DECISION: December 9, 1987 EFFECTIVE DATE: December 21, 1987 , 1 Ron G. Nelson a ry . Spri ter Building and Zoning Director Policy velopment Director Ric and ¢ Houg ton Public W rks Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Victoria Park Substation ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-084-87 APPLICATION NO. : SA-100-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway. CONDITIONS: 1. For screening purposes, dense evergreen landscaping consisting of coniferous trees and shrubbery should be provided around the entire perimeter of the new substation. 2. Provide 2% natural landscaping suitable for wildlife habitat. 3 . That the applicant submit detailed drawings showing a containment area of sufficient size to contain an oil spill and 24 hour/1 day rain storm on site. w` ' `' " December 16, 1987 Mr. Don Erikson Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subj: Victoria Park Substation Site Plan Approval ERC Review - Additional Information Dear Mr. Erikson: This letter is in response to questions raised by the City of Renton Environmental Review Committee about the use of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at the proposed Victoria Park Substation. I discussed this subject with Fire Marshal Gordon by telephone yesterday morning. In our discussion, I told the Fire Marshal that no PCBs will be used in any electrical equipment at Victoria Park Substation. The Fire Marshal recommended that Puget submit a letter to the City verifying this. As I explained to the Fire Marshal , Puget is planning to use a petroleum based mineral oil in the substation transformers and capacitors. Enclosed for your information is a Material Safety Data Sheet for the mineral oil . Additionlly, Ms. McKague of the Zoning Department requested that we provide three sets of the plans which depict how this project' s SPCC Plan improve- ments will be constructed. Therefore, enclosed are the following: 1. Drainage Plan; D-5175; sh. 1 of 2; rev. 1. 2. Drainage Sections & Details; D-5175; sh. 2 of 2; rev. 1. 3. Grading & Fencing; D-5174; sh. 1 of 2; rev. 1. 4. Grading & Fencing Sections & Details; D-5174; sh. 2 of 2; Rev. 1. 5. SPCC Curb Plan; D-5183; sh. 1 of 1; rev. 0. We hope that the above information and the enclosed plans satisfy your request for additional information which was directed to Andy Padvorac on December 11, 1987. Please feel free to direct further inquiries regarding the environmental review of the project to me at 462-3090. Other questions regarding the permitting of this project should continue to be addressed to Andy at 454-6363, ext. 5177. Very truly yours, Cfn�' / 0r r�yobS y;a auQ, r, Barry ombard (`JAt 4{� Associate Environmental�, t;1 O✓ b00,41 Scientist Enclosures BML/bl cc: A. T. Padvorac The Energy Starts Here 39-DC-3956 Puget Sound Power&Light Company P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue,WA 98009-9734 (206)454-6363 PUGET MSDS #0216 5-25-86 Dear Customer Thu Bulletin contains wnportant en•wonmental health and torrcology info/matron to,your employees who recently ordered this prodccr Please make,art this mlamatan rs ran to them If you resell This product.this Buktm should be peen to the Buyer This Form may be reproduced wuthout permrssan ~ ` Chevron U S A Inc Material Safety Data Sheet Chevron Prepared Accordingto the OSHA Hazard Communication on Standard (29 CFR 1910.12001. (Formerly Called MATERIAL INFORMATION BULLETIN) CHEVRON Insulating Oil CPS 241403 DANGER! HARMFUL OR FATAL IF SWALLOWED KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN TYPICAL COMPOSITION Highly refined base oil (CAS 64741-97-5, 64742-53-6) 100% EXPOSURE STANDARD The Federal OSHA exposure standard and the ACGIH (1985-86) TLV for mineral oil mists is 5 mg/m3 for a daily 8-hour exposure. PHYSIOLOGICAL L. HEALTH EFFECTS EMERGENCY i FIRST AID PROCEDURES Eyes Expected to cause no more than minor eye Flush eyes immediately with fresh water irritation. for at least 15 minutes while holding the eyelids open. If irritation persists, see a doctor. Skin Expected to cause no more than minor skin Wash skin thoroughly with soap and water. irritation following prolonged or Launder contaminated clothing. frequently repeated contact. Application onto the skin of rabbits produced slight erythema and edema. The acute dermal LDso (rabbit) was greater than 13 g/kg. . Inhalation Not expected to be acutely toxic by If respiratory discomfort or irritation inhalation. Breathing mineral oil mist at occurs, move the person to fresh air. See concentrations in air that exceed the a doctor if discomfort or irritation Federal OSHA exposure standard can cause continues. respiratory irritation or discomfort. See Additional Health Data. Ingestion Not expected to have acute systemic If swallowed, give water or milk to drink toxicity by ingestion. The acute oral LDso and telephone for medical advice. DO NOT (rat) was greater than 22 g/kg. Note to make person vomit unless directed to do so Physician: Ingestion of this product or by medical personnel. If medical advice subsequent vomiting can result in cannot be obtained, then take the person aspiration of light hydrocarbon liquid and product container to the nearest which can cause pneumonitis. medical emergency treatment center or hospital. ti Chevron Environmental Health Center. Inc, P.O. Box 1054, Richmond, CA 9 4 8 01-0051 x-tecort 107-111 Emergency Phone Number (4151 233-3737 No. 452 1 Rev. 4 01/17/86 ire, ADDITIONAL HEALTH DATA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION .-1 031 ro.-es See Page 3. Environmental Impact: This material is not expected to present any environmental SPECIAL PROTECTIVE INFORMATION problems other than those associated with oil spills. Eye Protection: No special eye protection Precautions if Material is Released or is necessary. Spilled: Stop the source of the leak or Skin Protection: Avoid prolonged or release. Clean up releases as soon as frequently repeated skin contact with this possible, observing precautions in Special material. Skin contact can be minimized Protective Information. Contain liquid to by wearing impervious protective clothing prevent further contamination of soil, including gloves. surface water or groundwater. Clean up Respiratory Protection: No special small spills using appropriate techniques respiratory protection is normally such as sorbent materials or pumping. required. However, if operating conditions Where feasible and appropriate, remove create airborne concentrations which contaminated soil. Follow prescribed exceed the exposure standard, the use of procedures for reporting and responding to an approved respirator is recommended. larger releases. Ventilation: Use adequate ventilation to Waste Disposal Methods: Place contaminated keep the airborne concentrations of this materials in disposable containers and material below the Federal OSHA exposure dispose of in a manner consistent with standard. applicable regulations. Contact local environmental or health authorities for FIRE PROTECTION approved disposal of this material. 'Flash Point: (COC)293°F(145°C) Min. REACTIVITY DATA Autoignition Temp.: NDA Flammability Limits: n/a Stability (Thermal, Light, etc.): Stable. Extinguishing Media: CO2, Dry Chemical, Incompatibility (Materials to Avoid) : May Foam, Water Fog. react with strong oxidizing materials. Special Fire Fighting Procedures: For Hazardous Decomposition Products: Normal fires involving this material, do not combustion forms carbon dioxide and water enter any enclosed or confined fire space • vapor; incomplete combustion can produce without proper protective equipment. This carbon monoxide. may include self-contained breathing Hazardous Polymerization: Will not occur. apparatus to protect against the hazardous effects of normal products of combustion PHYSICAL PROPERTIES or oxygen deficiency. Read the entire MSDS. Solubility: Miscible with hydrocarbon solvents; insoluble in water. SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS I Appearance (Color, Odor, etc.): Pale yellow liquid. READ AND OBSERVE •ALL PRECAUTIONS ON Boiling Point: n/a PRODUCT LABEL. Melting Point: n/a Specific Gravity: 0.91 @ 15.6/15.6°C Contains Petroleum Distillate. (Max,) Vapor Pressure: n/a DO NOT weld, heat or drill container. Vapor Density (Air-l): n/a Replace cap or bung. Emptied container Percent Volatile (Volume •): n/art n still contains hazardous or explosive Evaporation: n/a , . ; + % , ; • -1 ;I vapor or liquid. Molecular Weight: 278(Avg:,) -' e Pour Point: -40°C (-40°F) Max:-1, 7-% �' 'k•r:;`, `a-F'3 CAUTION! Do not use pressure to empty drum Viscosity: 8.0-9.6 cSt4; 40°C ' � � — '0 "r or explosion may result. tV; i� U ` n/a = Not Applicable NDA = No Data Available The above information is based on data of which we are aware and is believed to be correct as of the date hereof. Since the information contained herein may be applied under conditions beyond our control and with which we may be unfamiliar and since data made available subsequent to the date hereof may suggest modifications of the information, we do riot assume any responsibility for the results of its use. This information is furnished upon the condition that the person receiving it shall make his own determination of the suitability of the material for his particular purpose. No. 452 2 • • . .• • Material Safety Data Sheet CHEVRON Insulating Oil CPS 241403 ADDITIONAL HEALTH DATA Signs and symptoms of respiratory tract irritation may include, but may not be limited to, one or more of the following, depending on concentration and length of exposure: nasal discharge, nosebleed, sore throat, coughing, bronchitis, pulmonary edema and difficulty in breathing. This product contains base oils which the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies as having no evidence of carcinogenic potential. • - 3 al- • 1-IRCO41 107-8S1 No. 452 3 Rev. 4 01/17/86 BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT December 9, 1987 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Puget Sound Power and Light Company PROJECT: Victoria Park Substation ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-084-87, SA-100-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for a site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1. 1 acre. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Property located at 2915 East Valley Highway. B. ISSUES: Whether sufficient landscaping has;been provided to screen the project from other sites so that a campus-like environment is maintained; Whether appropriate measures have been taken to alleviate any harm due to a transformer oil spill. The applicant as part of there project will be submitting a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure plan (SPCC) as a mitigating measure. Included in the design of the drainage system is an oil separator. • Whether PCBs are present in the oils in the transformers; The comments provided by the reviewers are site plan related issues. C: RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non- Significance for the project with the following conditions: 1. For screening purposes, dense evergreen landscaping consisting of coniferous trees and shrubbery should be provided around the entire perimeter of the new substation. 2. Provide 2% natural landscaping suitable for wildlife habitat. 3 . That the applicant submit detailed drawings showing a containment area of sufficient size to contain an oil spill and 24 hour/1 day rain storm on site. y . Building and Zoning D.,^ rtment Environmental Review imittee Staff Report Victoria Park Substation December 9, 1987 Page 2 D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: No comments.. Fire Prevention Bureau: No comments. Design Engineering: No comments. Traffic Engineering: No problems noted. Utility Engineering: No comments. Parks and Recreation: No recreational or park impacts. Building Division: No comments. Zoning Division: Reviewer made the following comments: 1. For screening purposes, dense evergreen landscaping consisting of coniferous trees and shrubbery should be provided around the entire perimeter of the new substation. 2 . Provide 2% of site with landscaping suitable for wildlife habitat per code. Policy Development: The reviewer made the following comment: 1. The manufacturing park zone requires all areas of a site not covered by • buildings or paved surfaces shall be landscaped. In addition to the landscaping shown on the site plan, the areas outside of the fence should also be landscaped in order to soften the use and to create a campus-like atmosphere. This would be more in line with the intent of the manufacturing park zone as well as surrounding parcels. 5AS- ll:� J. _ {r A Ac 6 , li,r,' w-+1 A PI} .': .-?. XI. i — I.,1!N li g 1,:::,, li- g i e. r .„,„........,,,,„ . __ _L , III I .1._. r iI ..„, • „, _-- ill *.—Ile -- 1 — yll ii0, . 1 I>�':1 S 1 jM -_ , �QI'��f% O[ g 1� VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION A DATE SiGMEP ri REVISIONS 1, O / J/f�,�j) ORAWN N CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN QiAESTATE DEPARTMENT jvP'"°Eo — `E.LL ESTATE 0[P•n1uEH1 ` NOR ,o 7EP ids , roFlC�Wtdi`� LaI.-Ns•-- °' TV..Ni,.A* � 7ly an tar't ..,�vc1+E,1••'�•cakn.i�.Y�o' it' i.e w 6o ,r _�� ,o<r� II ,1 g+Su'ti`1:-r�T.l.^ - 1�1 b:=r�G'brb'-6T[i--___,=-�.9.�JRW'L� 'YI''' LGt-__ _ `� ji a FE. 'y l..f jtO'Yr1'JRLRO+.iJ CEP C.o%t�=.Ji•L`c , �' ':; ', p ,tear -- -4*- ---- l �`7 A / agya • a p' ' 3 z! a �� i NG ( 3 �� - ii :r W! COUNT"( LA ../.4 c'a.-, ..ice a�.• - : 1 _ - -•i�j• \ . na as..r -�1 0 +} ° - >' _ fit` i IL� /'��,SCALE 1'-2 60' i kR u,ad✓ -� trslJ._+_ c a- �_ ., ` o s.;a•->< ! _ -) • i •w.F{ .c.-14, _ s ... w} M r — ' �„ t 7 ` k 1 A F 46mGr.6&,1.-k.(1,4a.--a,,.r, • - - �.�f4lEL • 5ro'.✓2 / '� .. 1 .._o •1s'-__ —' 1 Ci [K mot{ (TG.WtI�v1F F&1cE 1•+/i st%•nt�s'YCZc:N� ( �` .��.�•` _I � mc<.ter ra!m �� H 'E�-:��- �\ iI,, H "u+�i q� iw j • ; ' _Y -�Y �,. ..,-E' 'i i 1 ..:,cF.w..S�. V�o -- -�__- �_ _ --- --_-- I I. ®� rr. b ,t yfo:� r..szr-uru is S I t - ° °F- 11 F .t- C I 3 c SITE PLAN 4 -- -- -- __ �� yq.,- r AD.AC 200 USES MAP • ,-i J f' SCHEDULE NI, COMMON NAME . —• —y �6M6d. 0L U BOTANICAL NAB SSzE COND.COMMENTS A / '�tl%'iPE(71r:) %•rv.� ': ptr( r_o'G+..rw.x' .a(f91 y° em • II + ' .ce^oaw.y.rns_ I)'iu.. 13,0 I- iv 1-Hev QZ ? .I .:..cc ow 13,14,-.- I- . -1 - i '- •, , < S�rx..Y-� .ram ...._ pia I-%,....b+�ro • I L ra' III i cx,00eov.�s N �I .E • _ _ • 7 3 �lh U..r�.tr: �p 1 .1 I ��•' a �i.16 ...i rv'rtm1. [' 6 G..1K Hn1. Cl) • �x lm4Pc ETTM p�e a'-a `""'" `� Vr.vcc.l,.0�,.zet, , ...Z.' �� o id iJ k.• 1 I. v!T .f� cc .A. /n s•t'x�ry i bic . .. �..�v: ac .m r+• o eAr ciil • ; r`; L� a Je r a x ri o.a. LZ _a �.�T+ NOTES I- 1--__ -_ __ __ -—i, •1•, ., •-•: •_r.: ..I .-1.'d".•"L iCI.(.P-,nl C-.-PL i..a p._L,/1 1'liyl!Irl e:� ® , rN '-1,a,.CAA,At-I4^t r„., • I va„r'. :..-1,..v-t.r'.-e-'I e....r�.f,•L�,r-. 0 PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN & DRAINAGE PLAN 1-a 20-0' A sac. • LI-1 • On0.A WI°1/0 F5. 001 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FIIT.LED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-100-87 • Application for site plan approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre of property. GENERAL LOCATION: Located on the west side of East Valley Road at 2915 East Valley Road. PUBLIC APPROVALS: • 1. Site Plan Approval 2. Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I� Jerry F. L.ind HEREBY CERTIFY THAT three (3) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME ON November 16, ,19 87 ,IN_ three (3) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in , on the /6 tt day of 1,thl] \Q 1 �PSQ� SIGNED: JeJUIA-g.U.ArvolL, INTEROFFICE MEMO. TO: DATE: FILE NOVEMBER 13, 1987 FROM: */ JERRY LIND SUBJECT: VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION 2915 EAST VALLEY ROAD FILE # SA-100-87 I spoke with Andy Padvoric today regarding the transmission . lines for the above referenced project. The lines proposed are 11.5 KV lines. Lines of 55..KV and higher are generally not undergrounded (transmission type) and are not required by the City to be so. 115 KV lines-can be undergrounded by one of two methods: (1) using an oil jacket lubricant to cool the lines or.. (2) using a new high tech plastic. The cost of undergrounding the lines is approximately ten times more expensive than overhead wires. Puget does not feel it is cost effective to it's customers to underground these wires with the Victoria Park Substation. OF . Rem . (: ° ) 9gr f0 SEPZE.gO OF PENDING . SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION PUGET SOUP'O POWER & LIGHT COMPANYA SITE APPROVAL: SA-100-87 APPLICATION FORA SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATION ON 1.1 ACRE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED AT 2915 EAST VALLEY HIGHWAY PUBLIC APPROVALS ' REQUIRED : 1. SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2. BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS© FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT To BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION r E -�.—.k F^ -—._ 1�t r P. 1. 13 S W I 103L -- , . ; , _: . i 1J i I` 3i a I I ' . • 1 I 4 E` - 21 JW S-IA/. ,27774 lo I 1 ( ,r� • G - 1 . . t . 1 . 1 1 1 1 s 3F sr0 ttr‘ . I I I a. 1 I �•11 / Srire 1 , �� W. 30rw sr 1 S•I • ' 31ST ST I 1 III` I I 1 I II i I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 .1 i rill S . : 1 : . W. I 1��.34TH ,_ STREET I VICTORIA PARK. SUBSTATION • SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-08#'-87 • APPLICANT PUGET POWER TOTAL AREA 1.1 ACRE PRINCIPAL ACCESS EAST VALLEY ROAD EXISTING ZONING M-P (MANUFACTURING PARK) EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPOSED USE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION.. COMMENTS LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY '2915 EAST VALLEY ROAD (WEST SIDE OF ROADWAY). . . . .• . • I ,,. • * . _ ___ - —— ( 34 % ) • ; . • - •n -.• -f4k-F.4-0= 1,..1 .• • : flitr,..7• 7 _.‘telit av . ,_,... IC isil IP—Mt, I 44-14011.4:4-rake NO i ..-. .! i 4., ..,-,—,..,.. ..N., -VA.•' ;ilk P11.1'10 men= slimirmsmxis , Wriq 1;67;-.17_,:,, ,-.:2---=----•-2;:_.‘..----- --'14'i .....1,•.0.;i ....44911k2giT"'",%•"`"'" '00-..4:,.....----9. .---• -,._ ...- -,,,,-•• .- -- _, -.....—.m--:. -,.c....;... Tr- IlVa6.1, 1 1 I i I . 4./-. .• ..• kat i II , 11 , i L 1 11444 ii SI. z% lak t.i 40 i i cvrre 41%g] -\ w,... 44,...,,,_,..4 -,--.- 1 ,,,,,,-, ,- N . . SECTION A—A • , SUBSTATION PROFILE P. . SCAM f iCr-0' •. 4 / .- IL . . . a W • . I I a. g % 1 1 . , • L1-2 , P • • • • Eralligialiklif,lerdkreiENCESINPLZI:k.SIV.ii.i11- ;:ale•Va:iirjf:Ase?:tqt';;7,1‘;',.5.";,T.7::;...,1",:-.,.:,. .:,:,:'.17 i'll7."7.r.i-•'W.:.:'.?,F;-:.,_1:1:::`..,,;.SrZ,:::?:7:''..:,'-".:,n'2,-,..-t-^r'!-T-':".Z"-,:::2-`:f.'1:37.`:--::7,:c:..',7.-;.;'•:';;.i.t?-,.. ,..'";:F..-...:;;',:-..'::r-h;--.717 -....',177 :7,;-F-Tc...i.7.7.."..',7.7,=:-.7:7-:-.5;:;'..:14.-*;.'•-.4.*-.:7;.'=_-.,'.f.-f. , • . -.. . . , . • . . ' - - • • % 4.• ''' _._- . I - ' —rearr-vAtt•-to . . • • Tiz..-r,,......*rep.015. .f1-1.1;61 • ,"1, • k ....,. ...., 1'V K.*/ILA 1 - -,t,/ &III'I . APnarfril-Ori...i...„,-11.1.1.-1,- •d.1.1.7.,..447 L-1-1" C.A.X.-1=d1.-01-4, ., ,(1,-r9.%7 c'Te.„-r-. 1.4-.4'1":14(i _,II r .14,t (‘ C'- o E --— • T A . ,, . 1 .41L, ITgEK -2 1 ti,),,,mi_lif4- ...p wr. ..0,3 .kt.T4 6.,,Erir,IT.5,cre, Ex%re i•wrer.pre i.....7.„...e.,,s . , .1 1 . 1 • ---r-----T----1------r- A --r-----r- 4,_., Iiiri f4+9X.VT — 1.1F-16 , ,,,h •PITC. II ..„. . r,d-elpos•.--le.S I P 'IVO ':-I it VZ 1r . ini , I it '......., INA 1 .4 . . V,I.sal' II'-'..41" l'. '} -- '\w,-. , SCALE.1•2 60 , ibiligiElri1717 " u.• • • 1 • ' • ' . , 7. 1 '' i -- ‘ ,,:r,t11)ree:ra.A.-i- , c...,ei • .r, I t . .1. 1 . I-1) .i.1 ' ill . ..”.1 ' g . i k - -wj,.• ---) L 1 rAtivri16* A I' . r I C ‘,.. f -. • . ri - a .b . G 1 p 44 - _ F ti.1'1 I . • _ • • Ket.k.o‘04.66,1P,6(4.E.A... ) .(tC.4' ia-56.40c4 g .'''''''.1.417.144:7-:,,,i',„ -4_Oro ±ii• B . . 41Ic44•.1,4r4 rr...4'Vs fvr.ye*tree.!o 142e. . . ) - . •iI,y."P. .,,, ..."-g,1-1w?ti,:". ->-. ---1-:,,-7-‘.'"-r.,21'' 1 H IE0y. H Voe...di h4t;E I 1 \---.. ' -- , ,i,,, I kke.e.ria4,-,11, tbk i 1 d., ____L__€, ...-,-- , • .C I F -a .", vLo•imuff-,-,k,411•11 Pe-crr-41-reef -gact. p',-,...-rpqr.r.. t,,A6,• f,,t. • .„ _ BITE PLAN - r-20-0- ---• • se . , (sl ) II -- -- , — ADJACENT USES MAP -- c NORTH l',200' A;- ..'•' -1.-"II "."'II"-'71 I P Win • • ' ' .1 —.. <: -... •I , . - i:LIVk.... . . 1,, • • I SCHEDULE * . A . 1 1---- ------ " • . - - — , I 1 • COMMON NAM ir.POL 11 SOTANICAL NAME' SZE CONS COMMENTS (41'4,1t-rft(Fr) . . , , .,..< •_.:- - •. . . 1 Ar...,••••• r i•--,-J4' IY-rIk..., e7its 1.4.4...rr..4,45p . 6* . \ 1 0 ...„ , ,.,,....„....,.,p„,.},..., . ---- -, ..-- 'Ir..: ,....- -'' - .. i. .,... ,1•,,,=.- lk.„.•....... . . „4.„.".,„-Pfi..... ik...f.. i6,21/5 -6‘..,..1Sr."6-14 .• Il. L'44,(..-Lnet.l. we-4405d,, 4 . . •• I . . CI •E . • IE..*,..., .. . . . 1 . .i. 174,14k..isl'Ill I 'fr'sv '.• • y ) S . rirA.F.,C.,-fr-Pr7 ...o.te..-1 idC anrd. e--S-5 ,....,..-• 21— . I'1 • cu9• 7" '4%-?;'g'`'r.,,t1-4-1 6Ir-iLd. ie413 o-re,...1.61-1A. CO , I 1 . . •I ,-.' 1 • • . . dor - , ,...1,...0.41c, .. arf,1-.41K.c.d L.....4ge...• ZII-21. I • • • . .v..1.1.ea 4'P.e ref-tI:Firra.! .,I Z.-1 TEri,..J...4 .0 4 It:Ve.c.dadI . ' . , .1=:1 14 Gwitis,1-11e,.r. V.wirev.,.) 1 r-ite (.,,,tt Fuu. 4 . 1 117T fiX.Ak..AS".‘4,4apc..0.,,I-t4. x I • • [' I '..-''''-'F1=1`;4n;r4 1'11:47 .,i'mT4 to,o. • re e.,"• • L": •'•Y - • .- ' ' . 0 , _ • .+ + • , - NOTES• , , •: . . -. IJ4eo • . s.1"6:41-; °,..frvt,....tX,tr'It;P d",ri+4,4rkr e0,V,• ' ' PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN & DRAINAGE PLAN • SMLIT r.20'-0- • A , ! - Li-1 WO.ORDER I . ',,i'cF..•XtFJ.,-c.741.7•StaaFi•Faa'2,11-.,<:;".,Ki>17.27,11:11fifi7rei....--M,;:ci. .-Cri .-,..,„_. 7.--rz,-,.-,3;-.n--,,.,_:,",z,,.7%=EI:T,F,,,,i,i.-i,„•;,-,1-',.;:.;,-,i,,,r,,,,Tc • --..i.,:.„A.:,,. ',,,.....,,,r,..::,;-,..=-F,:c,,,:I l'„I,-;:',I.,;•:-•;...I.Z..I, .,.....:. 2149N ENVItw 4ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: V� DATE CIRCULATED: :"Octmber 30, 1987 • COMMENTS DUE: November 13, 1987 EFC - 084- - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-100-87 ' " ; PROPONENT: Puget Soun Power K Light Company II,", . n, PROJECT TITLE: Victorial Park Substation ' BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): • IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY • 1) Earth • 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics • 11) Light and Glare ' 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities • COMMENTS ca`v ®F ENTON RCVD ED OCT 361987 • WODNG /ZO 11u DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /c," / ; 2d, /P'f7 Signature of Director o uthorized Representative Date Form 4 RENTC" BUILDING & ZONING DEPAI'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 084 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO : El PUBLIC WORKS "'DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : r El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : IIUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 13, 1987 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED SOlee 0‘140% DATE: 6:7Cr L?6 /9i7 SIGNATU E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 C Pi 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET , r a • ; _ I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( I+i DATE CIRCULATED. -October 30. 1987 COMMENTS DUE:, Novembers113; 198 -October7 EFC - 084- - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-100-R7 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power g, T, ght• Company PROJECT TITLE: Victorial Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_Anplication for a Site Plan ApDroval t•n construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth • 2) Air 3) Water • 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services '/ 16) Utilities • COMMENTS: ti-¢s�F We have re ' :wed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expe_ - in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where • addition o. '.'0 is needed to properly assess this proposal. // //6 17 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • • Form 4 RENTC ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOP :IEfT } PPP...MAI-1 *N REVIEW SHEET ECF - 084 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO: ® PUBLIC WORKS *DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU r ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i=i OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M, ON November 13, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : //-/Ty .NFr//l.E .e/A/C' El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED [UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TOj _ LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-WATER I /�/p W—/9 l; CA-4—'4 4 8•) • LATE COMERS AGREEMENT—SEI yR Al 0 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER A/0 (}1r t:L..i- ` SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C€{A^EE-SEV"eER y.ES $0. 04.L.S.tv FTX 417 7' 0 J 91D. �? IF s€062- SPECIAL ASSESSMENT A a c 2c-E-WATER Aip SVAnc& IS Quo&-- . SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ARE1 b. :A::::.-SEWER /viz I APPROVED WATER Pin 1V0 A RECOMMEND CONSIDERATION , APPRG°ED SEVER PLIA +J 0 �. SEPARATE IRRIGATION METER APPROVED FIRE HYDRRC . ,.:,.:r,,�ac;f.S FOR LANDSCAPE SPRINKLER BY FIRE PuE�T. NO SYSTEMS AND OTHER USAGES WHEREBY WATER DOES NOT ENTER C=Gf E_I'� :'.1 f"!'1LYvIS NO THE SEWER SYSTEM TO SAVE CITY SEWER AND METRO CHARGES. DATE: aAP S� SIGNATURE 0 RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 OP PENTON r) 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ' s.. E1;1�' W r,• :' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT. kPo\k ;. DATE CIRCULATED: October 30. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: ovembe'r pilmt POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EFC - 084- - 87 CITY MRENTON/`u:vI1., u ,-. APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-100-87 D OCT 3 0 1987 PROPONENT: Puget Sound power T,i'cjht Company PROJECT TITLE: Vectorial Park Substation E C �5 6 0 W I BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth • 2) Air v 3) Water 0, 4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals 10/ 6) Energy and Natural Resources I ✓ 7) Environmental Health ', 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing ✓ 10) Aesthetics ✓ 1 11) Light and Glare r/ 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation ✓ 15) Public Services ✓/ 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: itt-e- .vnt-e- Wore-4 AAA_ MeGit-17 jbt 141,44- b( L tiA.44., I►t.+ 1-a e L&.-°t 12.6t-tAt23 "-AAA ) c �/•cah 0w4 - 11 L o Let44-0G426444-e4t— AA-- DiedoLe-g' e-aerfr-t-4* tAt-t Idt *--- AL L Free .c • 1. •e., a -vwoez ewte., AAitLeAt-i- ilk,- loV-W 41( e-otAxrp-Lutdt rigAeca,2 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. LML4 at tW Z, h8i- Signature o Director or thorized Representative D RENTO BUILDING & ZONING DEPAF -RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • EC F 084 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-l00-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS .'DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : • DENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ❑ UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION OFIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT fl POLICE DEPARTMENT MPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 13, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 14.114/tA1OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CDITIONS ONOT APPROVED` Gelevuelk.uk*-, i..AIIL_ ILll, A Ai Air i �l DATE: allZI I'07- IGNATUR' OF DIRECTO' OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 CAT" CT' RENTO 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET f-;`� ' 1✓� ; 11 (if j I rn REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: W-)\�� ` '' ' ` / . ��11 DATE CIRCULATED: -"Octmber 30. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 13l9a)1 EFC - 084- - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-loo-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power g T,,"gt,t Company PROJECT TITLE: Vectorial Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct ' an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals • 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: •0 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas' of probable impact or areas where additional informati n is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form RENT® ' IUILDING & ZONING DEPAIrrk1ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF 084 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application) for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO: ® PUBLIC WORKSgDEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : LI ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ®,POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 13, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED LI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: // ;v'?";- :;7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR THORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 f._, Form 182 I, V tl J (11: F'i\I ON 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET \ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 11ra DATE CIRCULATED: October 30. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November h3, -98 08, EFC - 084- - 87 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-]00-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power r,i gt,t- Cnmpany PROJECT TITLE: Vectorial Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan A nrny .1 to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth - 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services v� 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 5 -7-2, {�L✓ C • • glyrjek,tAtiVAD. labia aI%% 4,00johiciemoda• pp& b `# We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we ' have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 9~ 2 / '8 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 a RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPA SENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 084 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre,. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO: fl PUBLIC WORKS4DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ei PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT Ei POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ® OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON November 13, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : r72.j , -6-i.- P P °10esr 4 MY/APPROVED EIAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS / ONOT APPROVED (117 4110, 1/)(/'' DATE: G � ;2 /9 57 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT IZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 tt; 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET '; REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: nP_'\nci �' ' ° `' 11 87 "DATE CIRCULATED: :-Octmber 30. 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 13, 1987 EFC - 084- - 87 'APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power night Company PROJECT TITLE: Victorial Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.2 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth ' 2) Air L/ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing ✓ 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation `./ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities c/ COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly' assess this proposal. /0 /J /0' Signatur of Directo,or authorized Representative Date Form 4 ' RENT—" BUILDING & ZONING DM --'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION . REVIEW SHEET ECF - 084 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-100-87 0 PROPONENT : Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway T0: El PUBLIC WORKS 'DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : DENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT [' POLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TOITHE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 13, 1987 8 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ® APPROVED El APPROVED WITH ONDITIONS NOT APPROVED // 1 ate 2") 4 /e7 /3d/c7 -121 DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 c: Form 182 \it 1r , 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 1 , ➢ i;°) G; [1 a a ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Zara v i_ „,. ', • - lel , ofDATE CIRCULATED. octmber 3p. 1987COMMENTS DUE: November'"13, �19 ° EFC - 084- - 87 APPLICATION NO(S).: SA-100-87 l PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE: Victorial Park Substation ' BRIEF ,DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan 'Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. j' ' �`.) jJ r r' LOCATION: Located at 2915 'East Valley Highway - i' ' 'j �a .� "� U 0 Mg SITE AREA: 1. 1 Pcite BUILDING AREA (grossWILD►niGRDv,NG ®EPr IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS I PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air A.- 3) Water 4 4) Plants ,/t % 5) Animals I p 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health I *A.— . 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics . 11) Light and Glare %I • - 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities I" COMMENTS: r: 0 ' OR... i1uto ?L+� i tEts4• t ertORE1tJ L'No 05coifoo(o C,UN�IS1Ihyezi cr comF oc.)$ -resse poor) c4-it,urbeEtti • 45 Hot)L-D GE FrtOu 1 0 i 0 Al2c2. to u P 7 L EN-f i rt ti E'ER 1 rvieleR, OF 'TIC wet,ou 1, St-16SIArrIGM . d PrLcwA 0.i. 1,670 op tilt Loo.!' v..1=tivose Nal h96 Su rimue Foiet. w►Low pe, tiPtP4ruhir Fem..Fem.. (dO DE . . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where • additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Qe,..krt..,, F. L L 1 I - 9 67, Signature of Dire or or Authorized Representative Date Forn► 4 . RENTC" BUILDING & ZONING DEPAr"" LENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 684 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application 'for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO: LI PUBLIC WORKSe'DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: El ENGINEERING DIVISION S TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ❑ FIR,E PREVENTION BUREAU D PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Q,r t EI „� � rra € a BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT i EIPOLICE DEPARTMENT � 'QV D EIPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2UILDING/ZONING DEPT. DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 13, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2..4)I% Ikj D. ❑ APPROVED MAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED d Mov,O c,0 omecr.. �� Tte L 5cAP►ro( coos's-WIw(0 Gt� C ommkot fl 1-Aztirsistal ktou ilftc . FtStIvvvete.R. cc. S u mY1 1IOrJ It) Sulbs1ITl1 kr.-44 CIP IIN(o c i 7O'Lu`f KtW 1,R►�►iZ�,1. 1 t`1 PTton..4 swd5y0,110h, w r-r►4 A ThLLV G.TtOwhw(, SrtOg_5. IZFcA rnwi , ) -r-4PT tAtkirtGt. Art GF Iv%f GTZ.ouh)O Coo 1 Pt.opos io % ►�,orocp 114:l 13* suasurriMo w%TW Soo 1=1100 1FtnnEo- DATE: } I- 9.1 7- SIGNATURE • IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 Ti: tak7;d 1• 1 __. l i , l r r ENV111und'1ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET `'� `� i�_a 2149N r .. ,� ..�� . �1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \t Ii I�•� ' \, 0 i 1i DATE CIRCULATED: octmber 30, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: November 13, '1987 EFC - 084- - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : 5A-100-R7 k PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Tight rnmpany PROJECT TITLE: Vectorial Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway r, SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use , 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics , 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewe0 this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise/in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is ne eto properly assess this proposal. / —7) ,-7----7-/ -, n:-, C r -',. .4.Y. ___i 'gnatire of Director or 'uthorized Repr ese ntative Date' ' L--r' Form 4 RENTC ' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA7111ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 084 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-I100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct 'an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO: El PUBLIC WORKS*DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ID UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT fl POLICE DEPARTMENT' [' POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 13, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : L- _ ), f APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE: /V i '4" SIGNAT - fiF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVI..-..MENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: rPvKs .2Nuacr=-a�lcY\ DATE CIRCULATED: October 30, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: Nobeth el 'l3) 1987 EFC - 084- - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power g T,;gt.t C'nmpany PROJECT TITLE: Victoria' Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Sitc Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth . 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants I 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation X 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: or rcM l4Apo � Ox, • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. l/M/V Signature Director or Authorized Representative Date For 4 . RENTf M BUILDING & ZONING DEPA°' 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 084 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO : PUBLIC WORKS4DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : [' UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT fiBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ® POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON November 13, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 'k/ APPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE: ///7.%//.. //d2,/7 SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED- REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 P-41: ET October 27 , 1987 Mr. Don Erikson - CITY Or f,ENTO'I _- Zoning Administrator � �. • City of Renton D C. r�. I !,, 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 OCT 2, 9QR7 Subj : Victoria Park Substation BUILDING/ZONING 4> r'7. Site Plan Approval - Application Enclosed is our application for 'site plan approval of our proposed Victoria Park Electrical Distribution Substation which is located at approximately 2915, East Valley Highway in the M-P zone. Enclosed in support of our application are the following documents: I 1. Puget's check number 159385lin the amount of $375.00 for payment of the site plan approval and environmental review fees , $310 and $65 respectively. These are based on a site size of approximately 1 .1 acres and a building permit project value of approximately $50,000. 2 . Environmental Checklist- Enclosed is the original and seven (7 ) copies of the environmental checklist for this project. 3. Legal Description- Enclosed are seven (7 ) copies of the legal description for this project. Also enclosed are the following three ( 3) recorded documents that arelreferenced in the legal : A. A.F. # 7909249002 , IShort plat; B. A.F. # 7608160613 , : Water easement; C. A.F. # 8110201540, ! Railroad easement. 4. Certification of Notification of Adjacent Property Owners/Site Plan & Postage Enclosed is: the list of mailing addresses for the seven ( 7 ) owners of adjacent property'; mailing labels for those addresses ; and 22 cents postage for seven (7 ) envelopes . 5. Conceptual Landscape Plan- Enclosed are seven ( 7) copiees of this project' s conceptual landscape plan, which includes vicinity map, and grading and landscaping information. The Energy Starts Here 21 d o 5760 Puget Sound Power&Light Company P.O.Box 97034 Bellevue,WA 98009-9734 (206)454-6363 Don Erikson October 27, 1987 -_- Page Two 6. Elevations- Enclosed are seven (7 ) copies of a drawing showing a north elevation. 7 . PMT Reduction- Enclosed are two 8 1/2" x 111 PMT reductions ; one each of items #5 and 6 above. 8 . Narrative- i Enclosed are seven (7 ) copies of this project' s narrative description. 9 . Site Plan Approval Applications- Enclosed are also seven ( 7) copies of this application. Questions regarding this project should be directed to Andy Padvorac at 454-6363, ext. 5177 . A-4,4 PolAib-ue Dick Causey Manager Land & Facilities Planning CRC/ATP:bsm Enclosures cc: A. T. Padvorac 21 do 5760 CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN • * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION APPLICANT: PUGET POWER t00 • APPLICATION NUMBER: SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA87 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to !these individuals as prescribed by Renton' City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER 1 . Consolidated 175 Linfield ' Drive 125380-0010-03 Freightways Menlo Park, CA 94025 AND Consolidated 2915 East Valley Highway 125380-0010-03 Freightways Renton, WA 98055 2 . MWM Land Company 20021 - 87th'lAvenue S . 125380-0020-01 Kent, WA 98031 3 . John Paul P . 0. Box 5429 125380-0090-06 Associates Kent, WA 98064 4 . Burlington 999 Third Avenue 125380-0100-04 Northern Railroad Suite 2100 Seattle, WA 98104 5 . Rhonda Younker 10982 - 101st 302305-9085-01 Edmonton, Alberta Canada T2H258 6 . Merlino Constr. 8630 Fauntlee Crest S .W. 302305 Company Seattle, WA 98136 9094-,,,,0 CITY OF REN T O',I 11 0CT271987 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • \ • 1 P ASSESSOR'S NAM ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ...i CERTIFICATION I, Amim PetcL yacq hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addreses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at Nc,R-rya , on the 2o-rvi day of . Wevip+ )Res U.vr,l5l9ia Ls CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I, �l�r'., � 1J� , hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were mailed on Nl0JJ, � , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at (R !U-T--fl k) on the R-1-14 day of t,v) i1 19q7. SIGNED: . FORM 206 �Y" o C'TY OF RENTO NT FILE NO(S): SA1100-81 V ts Bl:-:,.DING & ZONING DEPARTML _ _. ELF'CM ii -81 O N� MASTER APPLE CATI ON NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Puget Sound. Power & Light Company REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS t--� P . 0. Box 97034 u SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* Bellevue, WA 9 8 0 0 9-9 7 3 4- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* _ TELEPHONE ED SITE PLAN APPROVAL 310 . 00 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 4 5 4-6 3 6 3 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q . VARIANCE* . From Section: * Justification Required NAME Andy Padvorac OBC-11N ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: j P . 0. Box 97034 • ® SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE CD FINAL PLAT 454-6363 , ext. 5177 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Puget Sound Power & Light Company i ADDRESS ' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: P . O. Box 97034 ® PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP Q FINAL Bellevue, WA 98009 -9734 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 4 5 4--6 3 6 3 0 Residential ® Industrial JJCommercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Approximately 2915 East Valley Hwy TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING 1—� PRELIMINARY Vacant MP u FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Electrical Distribution Substation NUMBER OF SPACES: --I, x© ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 65 . 00 SQ. FT. ACRES 375 . 00 AREA: 47 , 770 1.1 TOTAL FEES ' `a `; I,-= ; 11 \I'',i STAF.F)USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE STAMP-2 I,IJ t , �_ � APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ��t 79 `�- ca J , 1,, r.;t: •' APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: CU:I �':`i�/ai.)NiNG DE PT.. ® Accepted ;.`_ Incomplete Notification Sent-:On' ,,;` �_ B : '. ' (Initi:als) s�- --- - DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: , APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: - 10 I-?- 0D jel Accepted EDIncomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: , 081 Building J .. Design Eng. Egj Fire IN Parks Pima Police CE:i Policy Bev. EK1 Traffic Eng. Plif Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 RIA PARK SUBSTATION VIC'��' SI7 FLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION • Pages• of 2 Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). Parcel "A" of City of Renton short plat number 379-79 , as filed under recording number 7909249002, records of King County, Washington. Subject to a 20-foot wide underground water line easement; recording number 7608160613; And subject to a 20-foot wide easement for railroad purposes; recording number 8110210540 . AFFIDAVIT Puget Sound Power & Light is the I, Wilbur E. Watson r being duly sworn, declarilfza#=Pamc ©authorized representative to act for the property owner, G?slowner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS -ri-I DAY OF �Tv FSEl. 19,. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT NORTH 131Er..N t PUGET SOUND SOWER & LIGHT CO. By' ---7 o (Name of Notary Public) (3igr:Wo ,) cretary 435z S.E. /�13aa5-+- P. O. Box 97034 (Address) (Address) Y1n tr '�r»,��ss a tbs.) ExY 12-6% oe..-r.IS, 1190 Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 (City) (State) (Zip) 454-6363 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 VICTORIA PARK SUBSTATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel "A" of City of Renton short plat number 379-79 , as filed under recording number 7909249002 , records of King County, Washington. Subject to a 20-foot wide underground water line easement; recording number 7608160613; And subject to a 20-foot wide easement for railroad purposes; recording number 8110210540 . • CITY OF RCN T n;4 OCT BUILDING/ZONING DEp7- VICTORIA PARR SUBSTATION PROJECT NARRATIVE - 10/20/87 I . EXISTING CONDITONS A. Comprehensive Plan Designation: MP-MO B. Zoning Designation M-P C. Site's Land Use VACANT D. Adjacent Land Use VACANT & WAREHOUSE II . PROPOSED USE Puget is proposing to construct this electrical distribution substation at approximately 2915 East Valley Highway on .our property which was purchased on October 24 , 1979 . This substation will convert transmission voltage at 115 kV to distribution voltage at 12 . 5 kV. There is an existing transmission line directly east of our site along East Valley Highway. The significant components of the substation include : A. Two (2) 35 foot tall dead end towers. These are inside the substation fence and are where the taps off of the existing transmission lines terminate. B. High voltage buswork. This component conducts the transmission voltage from the dead end towers to the transformers. C. Two (2) 115/12.5 kV transformers. These components convert the transmission voltage to 12 . 5 kV, which is distribution voltage. One will be installed now and one in the future, as demand requires. D. Low voltage buswork. This component distributes the distribution voltage to eight ( 8 ) circuits. These circuits leave the site underground, the voltage therein being further reduced by individual pad-mounted transformers for use by customers in the nearby area. E. Other electrical components. There are other miscelaneous pieces of electrical equipment with the site. N. OFF RF_NTOM:J L I'1 OCT 2 7 1gfu BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. III . PROJECT TIMING/PHASING A. Current Construction Improvements scheduled for the first half of 1988 include: -Grading: 3, 000 to 4, 000 cubic yards . -Fencing: Fenced area to be 115' x 160' . -Driveways: Asphalt. -Foundations . -Two deadend towers: 35' tall each. -One 115/12 . 5 kV transformer . -Landscaping: Per code ( First planting season following completion of construction) . B. Future Construction Improvements that are now identified to occur in the future include: -One additional 115/12 . 5 kV transformer. It is our intention to obtain site plan approval now for the said future transformer. (- The Geaiior, PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPAN., Washington Corporation, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00), the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and agreements herein contained, do hereby grant to the GLACIER PARK COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter called Grantee, an easement to use for railroad purposes, upon the following �,� described premises situated in King County, State of Washington: $1?� Being the westerly 20 feet of Parcel A. Short Plat #379-79, recorded ). in King County Records, Volume 20, Page 132, #7909249002. Termination on Cessation of. Use. In the event that the Easement Property I shall at any time cease to be used by the Railroad for railroad purposes, the easement herein granted shall immediately cease and terminate without notice or other proceedings on the part of Puget, and the Railroad, its successors or assigns, shall reconvey immediately the Eas. •'ent Property to Puget. Construction Activities. All work to be performed by the Railroad on the Easement Property shall be in accordance with the plans submitted to and approved by Puget and shall be completed in a careful and workmanlike manner to Puget's 1 CD satisfaction, free of claims of liens. Upon completion of the railroad vfacilities, the Railroad. shall remove all debris and restore the surface of the O . Premises as nearly as possible to the condition in which it war at the commence- CV ment of construction, and shall replace any property corner monments which were CDdisturbed or destroyed during construction. The Railroad shall also pay all — costs necessary to reestablish destroyed survey references and hubs established I CO by Puget in conjunction with any survey on the Premises. Release and Indemnity. The Railroad does hereby release, indemnify and promise to save Puget harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, cost, damage, expense, actions and claims, including costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Puget in defense thereof, asserted or arising directly or indirectly on account of or out of acts or omissions of the Railroad relating to the rights granted the Railroad herein. Title. The rights granted herein are subject to permits, leases, licenses and easements, if any, granted by Puget affecting the property subject to this Agreement. Puget does not warrant title to the Premises and shall not be liable . for defects thereto or failure thereof. Assignment. The Railroad shall not assign its rights hereunder. No assign- ment of the privileges and benefits accruing to the Railroad herein, and no assignment of the obligations or liabilities of the Railroad herein, whether by operation of law or otherwise, shall be valid without the prior written consent of Puget. Successors. The rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to be executed this t ,,. day of. /10,4,a, 1981. CITY OF RENTON ,�-� PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY rtl) Fp le- \I Wi i.i _-- OCT 271987 By. ..-Z:AfeArDirector . to 5,nr, CA_.HSL 4 4 • BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. ,INOOO,OW •3� • • SK01! e,0 0,1 MI a o tirof7 I 1 110 ;n,Nd >>b 1. q F i STATE OF WAStiI\' N ) RPORA'I E ACKNOWLEDGMENT // ) ss. COUNTY OF K i M G ) On this i sT day of R?R\ L. ,19 a_,before me, • the undersigned.personally appeared W vh I. VC.- Q Y 'ON u ett- - 1 ,to me known to be the 'C1, QE C.To R end Caw\ t', k C.,may,of Pv.0 elf Sou V.\A 40we.r J '- c h 4 Co. , the corporation that executed the foregoing Instrument,and acknowledged:the said Instrument to be the free�evol volun- tary act and deed of said corporation,for the uses end purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. . Notary Public In and for the State of • Washington,residing.at Ly'�r1woV RECORDER'S NOTARIAL SEAL NOTNOTES:AFFIXED 0 N O . „, 'et S. W. 2r/h STREET' I 3-Pi e? i�5 U.') I j ::'� :g--r :3.7 9.Y { I • .-+' •.5 1°5O',�270 ;I' . S I`'S,`.''' lv. ' n.ct7 R•• �:, 7•' 'A:55 X or)Jf I 1 I — (,�J� C: p,030'29'' h8 4 a” i 1 L r 87',8.1 L• 85.18 '10,Q7 I •1'•R9, :, .2 f'':v.•' '1 , 4 'N 99'40.?5'W. I ,:1 Ce, ,I 10.09 1 • 'I. 6r • g` - III MI 1 4y; an' s s I • >aI f �`11 1 jII�NZ • ,iz /0 ialz / .— I. il.." OI I fu 255 Qe2t q¢I'•i /80,07/. Lv rd5,09eQ •—'oI•• 2('J/7911J , IIZ b Z1b• ':b DI 1�+ �. I 1' Y ' I� ''I 1 II • ppO �1 t�1 Il 114 SEC in+, 6,38°33.Y9' , • Ix : L +50.48 • I I ! I I� • :`,d'1..V 00' (� ,L.1964 .1 I •4P '4 ' I L.: AG.39 L +3d.HS 6,. L • • - i � • :'.,c rf N McV'.el 'h d8° 4' 7"V •, . -.• — Inc) •-�--- . ' . -A _2 : ^ II� .I. ,_ i, + ., ti, ,;4 E —.7122; -- .--'_- r70. Y — _- q1.. • SI� —'• ..�24 � �..: • 71 .V UnJeryrcu.fd �': � weer Latemeai•0 I Ii11,:zr a: 55.(0 .' I •A: /v:. :;:' 2.,PI •' r_ 1 ^III • Lr86.39 I' 1 I I II r. I • , . , L:49 s'cd I I • !Ito 1R' • I I . "' • +I M . mioil: W • , I' . IQ .,:..•216,989� . e '° /74,C95�•' 1 I. 179,2174 J 196,225� ei •.. • o �: / �I .,, Crr Se- --!)-' -_ .mow r- ,I •. --4•1 1.I 20 .: —N 87°SI�09"W_-—_N B'Lle'erf,.ir--; _::c,:•.,•L4_t -- t_- "I97°?1 J3"ir �j `. of - -375,49 -_—•_—•-- .'.a•Od--Ir ?.?•0 ---i=�8/ 15— I `1f� I Vi NI • • 'I Io'� �w, h • I +!iti o fa 0 1 33 i • I. 1 •'l' �f,hf,Ermf. t ; ♦ Exhibit` A 1 ORILUb.INDlJSTRJAL K 1 c•� . • ;,O z 'I• I` ti .45' ..._ n w . • 6N-I . ;: �: 1'4 I II��KK77�� • `:' ..). • SCALr_•! i W''' "la u IIr'vV ' . 17.e, i I ,I • i, • • s p;. ;SAL.EAct ►- 2 :'Tit x`ESkr'' •,.: si;:_ : . - ',. :�:•:a'./y ,. !7i:: '.. _,e: •.`,U,f.� . r,K.� .k�,,7••:.fit.; j '7J, , , •' '.t'5+7V) • 1I_ <I1:r_;1..' ;; '.1ll Y•_':1^ • I i •,,i • `,• .:;, .ti ll S.!N. 34fhh .0 f;rXE-'F_T • Mo�`ch line + '_ ----.A..... 1 41, , . , . :,..i , ...... . . 0 ,..,.......:_, . . ic 'jg3•�r. oar• SECTION 30, T 23 N,' R 5 E, W.M. . f _ ie.,. I••so' . k • I • • / II J • • j /I�/ I I f I DESCRIPTION • I I I Lot ,B, Diva I, Bur//np/on Northern I Or////o Industrial Pori of Ren/on, Irot I{ ' Division I, as recorded In Volume • S 89.20'47"E I~ /OB of P/o/a, popes /P B /!, .., ,-:-9. I ——-- 14�;L,yyr•L_T i j.;yM T records aKing County, Washington. m�son.[v.? t _y_._ . i.7 M i $ , ' "'PARCEL- A , , g OWNERS: O PARCEL A . Puget et Sound Rorer B L/ght Co. lo�De NE 4►n ; • I Bellevue, WA. 98009 a"B7.£3--- --4. ---1- PARCEL B: 1.1... --_ A/BB°2 "4r,1y_ t., r.n. . Glacier Ape Co. Seville, NM. 99/04 . I I 9 G� V APPROVALS: . • 1 \ DEPARTMENT or PUBLIC .owns Eeon,nod N SIN 1e.-der of,Spf I , `' �e • Arscror of PutiNo,prti Traffic Engineer �h �Ib PLANNING DcAvRrly[NT: 19.. PARCEL B ih v1 I hereby prl/t, trill the sriMin pbf I h duly reo..td *Ms hry W RMbn Gpr/rn►JAI d%Ors 1879. .44 pa , I /o rc/w • a ._,.. .A...r a rrn 11 .e rr '•- -n! ►+ w ,' rAI° No rr:Jrr,Precise...N..7909I409S0 ~ere re.s r I; N Foe,e 'OM LW) SURVEr0d5 CfATir,CAre i lI MNMI,reny NI,MO Phil pill SO At AOted upon O.0Ch0/Server One tubd,rrtion of I 1 ` Section 30,TSP N,RS E.W M. MO,Ms oewses • 1 one bN drinr on Ino.n conveneMlreon,Mot tt E ,the montmrnls Nr/0e tar oaf Me far cp�ntra .� I/ORed correeld o7 Mt 90uld, End/601//yye .,d': ''.\ fully complied win pror ens Of Alt plyn1 IV • -----i N 87.5/09 W i . r•: Alpert r��I,ant MrI1Ma. ��!,._•r•�i'..r Art lb. r389 w '1 I I `"r•-�` o I I I I RECGROINS cemnr/CATS • • I Plied for record/NY- Om of •,/9Tl, ^ . et minela pan. .lid r.csa*d b i- volume_._d P/O1S, Pops -, POMP.* r. • of King Coin?y, •WosNnpron• DIVISION Or RECORDS / ELECAONS I. SW 341h Si Manager GARDNER 'ENGINEERS, /NC. ManagerSepnnisndnl eI R.co ds S7OIl/e, Wosh,ngton . .mod._..... _ _ -'--___—_ - -_..__ 20-132 -� . I , • \.UI\ 1 lJ�-L l l ICL I I tr I\ 1 (..• L‘..1l•1. • • QUG•16=la O u z 8 6 7633160613 3.LJU • • Date + Sera; Nc (Rece+ving Numbertrlassificalinn! :Amntl;'' M 4 h it 4 •� .,�.".r sa ) . CORRECTION DEED The Grantor, GLACIER PARK COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, hereinafter called the Company, for and in consideration of the agreements herein contained, does hereby grant to the CITY OF RENTON, hereinafter called City, an easement to lay down, construct, reconstruct and permanently maintain an underground water line 3 through, under and along the following'Idescribed premises situated in King County, 1 State of Washington: 1CO _ A strip of land twenty (20) feet wide being ten (10) feet on each r- side of the following described centerline: Commencing at a point on the east line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., Kin County, Washington, which point bears South 1°50'23" West 2102.78 feet from the northeast corner thereof, and'North 89°34'54" West, a distance of 35.77 • • feet, the true point of beginning; thence North 89°34'53" West, a distance of 1308.04; thence North 1°35'12" East, a distance of 782 feet: Together with a slope and construction easement up to 60 feet wide. being 30 feet on each side of said easement center line, reasonably necessary for original construction of said water line: This easement is made subject to and upon the following express conditions: ' I ti The Company, for itself and its successors and assigns, reserves all rights 1 to use the property hereinbefore described for anyand all purposes whatsoever 1 not inconsistent with the easement hereby granted, including, but not limited to, the right to construct, maintain, repair, renew, reconstruct, replace and operate railway tracks and future tracks, communication, signal and electric power lines, utilities including sewer lines, water lines, gas lines, streets, sidewalks, 1 roadways and other types of facilities on said property when deemed necessary or expedient to the Grantor. Rights reserved shall be so exercised as not to damage or interfere with the water lineias above defined. This easement is sub- ject to all existing interests of thirds parties in said property of any kind or nature whatsoever and any and all extensions or renewals thereof. ' II This instrument does not grant or convey unto the City any right or title to the surface of the soil along the route of said permanent easementgexce t for p the purpose of laying down, inspecting, restoring and replacing the water line. ` III The City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Grantor from any and all loss, cost, damage or expense arising out of work performed by the Grantee or its contractor in constructing and maintaining said underground water line regard- less of whether such loss, cost, damage or expense arises out of damage to, or destruction of the property of the Company or any person, firm or corporation whatsoever, or out of claims for personal injuries or death. IV In the event that this easement shall at any time cease to be used for an underground water line, or shall by operation of law or otherwise become, vacated or abandoned, the easement herein granted shall immediately cease and terminate without notice or other proceedings on the part of the Company, and the City, its successors or assigns, shall reconvey immediately said property to the Company. -1- Y 1 1 This deed is issued to correct an error in -description of that certain Easement dated April 22, 1975, from Glacier Park Company to the City of Renton and for no other purpose. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement in duplicate this dayof (D' . �r , 1976. 01 •'.,� •. �4,1‘ GLACIER PARK COMPANY `.•)•,:t."„"s-;„r:.' .'. •. By: • .Cfl �1 �� d1,Zi ? Vice Pr • nt ---e . ' ,c, _. .... r` •••• Attest: c'� ,:-•f Assistant Sec etary • ,;,' ) • Approved as to form this day • of . , 1976. • STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. • County of Ramsey ) • On this �O te day of i n , 1976, before me personally/ p n lly appeared J. C. KENADY and EA. DEMING . to me known to be Vice President and ASSISTANT Secretary of Glacier Park Company, the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Glacier Park ! Company, for the uses and purposes thereiny l mentioned, and on oath stated that they I were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said Glacier Park Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. ' M. M. SMITH II NOTARY ' NOTARY PUBLIC— MINNESOTA M Ytti . 4rviD:11- M RAMSEY COUNTY Notary Public in and for y Co mm. Expires Dec. 18, 1978 th State. of >R Minnesota, residing at � ��z.cc/� . . • I -2 • - i 1 II OF I? > 'L ECF: f 1.�- o 4-6"7 A. aV �41 O LU: CU-ion-�'1 �i © z City of Renton o NIL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0,91TED SEPIet' Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own • observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. CITYor r,8 A. BACKGROUND D r IN (� �IIj'c'"r 7 I�' 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Victoria Park Substation m.,.2 Lb M 7/9e1 2. Name of applicant: Puget Sound Power & Light Company �UiLD'�r��G;^ ,•;,,�r C.Pr 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Attn: Barry Lombard Phone #: 462-3090 P.O. Box 97034 Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 4. Date checklist prepared: October 20, 1987 S. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Building and Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is scheduled to begin in February 1988 and is scheduled to be completed by early summer 1988. 7. Do you have any pla or future additions, expansions, o iirther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Yes. The substation may be expanded to a double bank substation in the future by installing additional electrical equipment within the confines of the fenced area of the current proposal . 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A geotechnical engineering study was prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no applications pending for government approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by our proposal . 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Application for Site Plan Review, Environmental Checklist, Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Victoria Park Substation will be a single bank 115-12.5 kV substation that will provide power to the Burlington Northern Industrial Park. The substation will be located on a site having the dimensions of approximately 170' x 281 ' . The portion of the site containing electrical equipment will be surrounded by a 7' chain link fence and will have the dimensions of approximately 115' x 155' . A second bank of electrical equipment may be installed within the confines of the fence in the future. The station will also be provided with two driveways, landscape easements, an irrigation system and a spill prevention 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand control and the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and counter- section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of measure area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, plan. site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is located in the NWk of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. The site is located near SW 29th Street (see attached vicinity map) . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); 0-1-aD rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 1%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. See attachment. II d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. i No. - 2 - ose type, and approximate ue :ies of anyfillingor e. Describe the p yp pp q grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. See attachment. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, although erosion impacts should be minimal as the site is flat. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? See attachment. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None will be required as the site is flat. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed?, If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be minor emissions from vehicles used to construct the project. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? There are no off-site sources !of emissions or odor that will affect our proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None will be required. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No surface water bodies are on or in the immediate vicinity of the site. • 2) Will the project require any work lover, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. - 3 - 4) Will the pr sal require surface water withdr Is or diversions? Give general desur,Ntion, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste materials will be discharged into the ground. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The primary source of runoff will be from rainwater falling onto the site. This will be collected in catch basins and discharged through an oriface and retention system to an existing storm drain system on East Valley Road. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. There will be no liquid wastes as a result of this project. - 4 - d. Proposed me -es to reduce or control surface, _ md, and runoff water impacts, if any: A drainage system will collect runoff in catch basins and discharge surface water through an oriface and retention system to an existing storm water system on East Valley Road. A Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan will also be made a part of the project. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ❑ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs E5 grass ❑ crop or grain ❑ Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ❑ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other ❑ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is partially covered with grasses and small herbaceous plants or shrubs. This vegetation will be removed from the site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: See attachment. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. - 5 - d. Proposed m gyres to preserve or enhance wildlif any: None will be required. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The completed. project will not require energy for heating or manufacturing, etc. The project is a substation to be used for electrical power distribution. Some electrical energy will be used for low level lighting of the completed project. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None will be required. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no environmental health hazards associated with the project. Oil-filled electrical equipment will be located within the substation. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: A Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC) will be included as part of the project and provisions are made in the drainage system to separate and retain oil in the event of a transformer oil spill . b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is located adjacent to East Valley Road and near the East Valley Highway and, therefore, is subject to traffic noise. - 6 - 2) What types a evals of noise would be created h. :r associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (tor example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Daytime traffic noise levels may increase during construction. There will also be noise associated, with construction equipment. After construction, noise levels at, the property boundary. will meet applicable state standards. • 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The specific type of transformers used and placement of those on site will ensure sound levels at the property line are within the applicable standards. 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? See attachment. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe. The site has not been used for agriculture in the recent past but may have been prior to development along the East Valley Road. c. Describe any structures on the site. The only structures on site include a street light, a sewer manhole and telephone line vaults. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP, "Manufacturing Park" f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MP, "Manufacturing Park" g. If applicable, what is the current. shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. I i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. if any: None will be required. - 7 - I 1. Proposed n ;ures to ensure the proposal is co itible with existing and projected lana uses and plans, if any: Development of the substation is compatible with the zoning of the site and with existing uses of adjacent properties. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None will be required. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. See attachment. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site will be landscaped along East Valley Road. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Low level lighting will be provided to illuminate the station at night. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off—site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Low level lighting will be used to control light and glare impacts. - 8 - 12. Recreation a: What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are no designated or informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity. Longacres Race Track is located approximately one mile from the substation site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None will be required. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. However, if during consItruction any artifacts are found, the„appropriate agencies will Abe notified. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is served by East Valley Road. Two driveways, on the north and south sides of the property, will provide access to the public street system. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? See attachment. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking spaces will be provided or eliminated. Parking space for maintenance vehicles will be available within the fenced portion of the site. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. - 9 - e. Will the pr :t use (or occur in the immediate!, inity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes. Rail. tracks are located on the west side of the property. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The completed project will generate approximately one vehicular trip per week. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None will be required. • 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. • b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None will be required. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities c rentl - ailable - I - ite: Olectrici_t natural gas, Ovate , efuse service elephone <Oa=septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The project is an electrical substation which will provide electrical service to the vicinity. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. (Q� � Proponent: \� -§ ,� Name Printed: Barry mba rd - 10 — #176 11-8-84 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SH FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - 11 - 5. How would the pi sal be likely to affect land an' loreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: - 12 - I Puget Sound Power & Light Company Attachment to Environmental Checklist Victoria Park Substation B.1.c. According to the King County soil survey, the site is underlain with soil classified as the Tukwila Series. This is made up of very poorly drained organic soils that formed in decomposing sedges, rushes, grasses and shrubs. According to the geotechnical engineering report, this organic soil is overlain with up to six feet of medium dense granular fill . B.1.e. Approximtely 3,000 cu. yards of fill will be imported and approximately 600 cu. yards of pre-load will be imported and used for fill as needed. An additional 300 cu. yards of gravel surfacing materials will also be imported. The source of fill is unknown at this time. B.1.g. Approximately 2,500 square feet will be covered with impervious surfaces upon completion of the project. This is approximately 5% of the total area (graveled surface areas are not included in this estimate) . B.4.d. Landscaping will be provided along the east side of the property which faces East Valley Road. Landscaping will include Norway maple, Red maple, Shore pine, Scotch pine, Vine maple, Laurel ; Rockrose and Ivy. A Landscape Plan has been prepared. B.8.a. The site is currently undeveloped. It is bordered on the east by East Valley Road and on the north by a railroad right-of-way. Consolidated Freightways and Gordon Trucking Inc. occupy adjacent property to the north. and south, respectively. These companies operate warehouses which involve ' shipping with semi-trucks. B.10.a. The tallest height of a proposed structure is a 35' high deadend tower. The principal exterior building material will be chain link fencing. B.14.b. Yes. Peak hour commuter buses stop in the general vicinity. Bus #167 serves East Valley Road and bus #s 247' and 163 serve nearby Lind Avenue. 22-DC-3956 — . . ... . . . . • •Mg-1...:',:•''••.:....,. ' P.••••::;•:?.,..;.:::•:12e.• . . ' . •••:,-...•.1.,-::•••,....••i•:•.••...,"., . ' .• . , . •.. '-':'.••• •':. •••,':.';•::•:'•';;:.:'••••'.• • • . • . 1 •.' • . • • . ''•!.:•..1',n..:1•.':.•. , • ••• • • • 4. . V •• . . .. .•• • . 'i '..• • • ' ..:.•••'.• •••• .“.' •.. .. ••, .,.. . . . .... / V, ... IS • • ..1 ... .....i.013.15,..V ..... •Alf .,,,,, 1 0.itMliV. :•.1. • ••• VB.41Z1• „.4 I : A./11P11%, '. . /.0-t,'":'.k.:N,,, • —P-,vt•';:ii, IPI1/4-wi.eq- 1 .. t I.: I. t5.:1111 4 . *t.e.i. z%•I, ..p- a d:. . sit. I t 0°1 CD: ,, .1mLual> ............ ,.. 1 • i.i14 ,.0.1,h.F.4,, ,-. , .4 s.arn, IM.LACE‘SL , .4^..a.s. 1 SA; . 1V....:: f ITV-^ • . I 11• : • a • . • ..TM _. , • • '' c. 'r:grt,e,•,y,..; ' .1.4. . • msTA k 1 s •• Wi. . s/ NINallpii.#4 •lel. Milli.. .07/11k, I 2 s " ..,; une sr• .111 . \,• , _... , .• sE . 1 •• ..---/ .. . .. .• : _.,! - .• s • ..... ik ..... . . . ..... i , .. 4.-.7.,;;;,,r, ,..-1..\si.,- -.-.•-—7 , •. -.:.• ./'•i .0 '1;•.1..4 - •;' oTr -\,..s. e_isr•••'..lititliphisp.._‘t%.%Cf<le ' '''7 10' ' Tin • Ili. '.I ad. ? f • . .. ri ' • I MTITY .-_,‘ -1111t r ifif - . ...J. 7•E •.:,.:.;...... - '4110.1111 -.•:411•!•111-1:41, ` • s t. .. ,,I of . 6A" 1 0.1! . ci s. • .4 . - . NIA, •:•::4::::::410( . 1 !I •• E N 11 0 N IOW! . 6, , ... . ' •, -74-6::.:,' 1,— 4:i:::Kp.:•::::::::, • mi ,I wilmi 7......I . ? -- • i t :K2:41.4iigiA. 0. i f• ;.;...., "::. ,idk...1:'.;.;:ili • . i ' 3 „.!.5.. i ...ti: _ ite.itifii::::::::::::0 . . a b t•.k, :il_......_4 7 7 7.1_ •si 1 k.. W.. ——. r mililiirli•— -•.......es.Werte.e.9 ,.. . IMMIML.V)•l':'' . sw• ST 4.0* tic, ..,.,. WM •• -IN ki . -e ' n• . f zik 4:4\ 2,, `1 ,-- All. a...• • , i ial Id 11E11 qv Project Site'. -1 Ill 'a .isalw rr '.• I .y '• - I ' VI gr) i'firLa 1 I • 26 E 251 : •,. . I , . 0014 ST liar; g . a DIM,. wir:Say I . \ CD7 1 I • I '.- thm ram I aL. : • \ ar • I '' 1 I • '•-•5175 •• •.. \ I • es . 0 ••••.. • .• • I " I . kiiiPiP ST 1111 .•••• ........1 fs3. z . • .. . . • .... . .. 4 ' . • w • IT . _._.... ....._NSW SS SI.e 1 t S ) t _ is,WW•ssr , •_.._a •u _., ..$21-61-' • --1/-— .. —4 ,-- -r- ' u •— •----.-7.t, 1 ' ‘" • SS a-1 Creit.:P •" 1 r • . i4 c)i . I 1 4 ._ mrosii. ss , CC ITSTaa ST 1 J....caw ''...41121401.• ;107 'I i , ••• I ihraali 71Ih , g . ... 1 - . • 1 , .. • . -..-0 cr N.-' • 4 • . . • 'IS 1 .4...ii... i . 1 t: LAOS*r. ... • • .. 411T . I ....di" ‘. g - ra i : I 1 W .,..:0 1 •90'i, 1. 2 ''. I 4' 4 0211 II ASW 4 II . . I . . w..f.... :., 1,.. . ). U 17STS ' I • ..h. 14 r I 2 A 'i %,• . .-t a ' I E • v.',... t 1 ... • . i I 1 I 1 • X.P: , n . 0 • SHT >A 4 • g 1 :I . c-7441 .f• 10.--r_L It le ST ST•ofT, s • . t• : . . i 1. . : :•.• , .li g iSts• 1 -- . ..?.. i " 36 1 • 1 s,& • I 31 .!.:, 3 32•al - : •••MIMI ..ir . . 6- • r-i-- Liv.i•n.F. •1 , i : .1 , final, % IT . . ._. •tE• rig" "N I ; P • .4. .. I . , IS Unit 1 ;U .11.. , • '14 i ..". ' ST ' 2 Wg" NI . . . • • 1 i - •( \‘• -k ••—:4- •-,. i . I - 1 n.f. .../ I . , MTN ST . CO s 0 WM IT 4 ••S I . •i' SE 197m 2 ziel/ii . / i •••••................c5i77' 'MN. " I/ i NT, sr.JUISDLJI... .D. 1 st mint SP: II • a.t.• ra i --, .bl....• Ab. .—• 7„..,------"'''• . ,ia ":.1 4 T 221". _., . ..tte • . . L-4:51/41 i . !•`!" . . 4 I ..N•ww, .1 4.' V IT i • lin a • . ' " 1 5C Di , ; .. ' ' t . I• '1 I I 1 • I n'''Its, ,,. 'Its I • I t'-r- It. 5 -k 3 : '..4... 2 . I s . ' • S UN ST \ .• ' 4-.1172:0•11 IT s 4 ; . 200TH 4 ST la •• . I SOLNSISSO wawa* re • I 1 .. iS 2fCSISOTT s . . DiDs THesesS ui...sT x2 ry. I . . . • E •mil- _1. ft 1 h . ,. . - • 'A i. / . .13, 1 . Ij.t. 1 . '.11 , --f,. .- . . See Map.48 • . .. .. .. • . • • . . • . .. • . . . .,. • "• - • . . . ,• • • . • . _ -- — .-...4 • .,, .. . • . , .. . • 'Puget Sound .Power & Light Company, . . • . • . • • • • Vicinity Map . •-"' . Victoria Park Substation • . .. , .,•.::-...!..- . .• . • . . . • . • .. . • . • . : ,,.., •. . .. , .. .. , , -::::',.•.:-., • - • .. • . , . . , ,. . RENTOI IUILDING & ZONING DEPAR ENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 084 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : Site Plan Approval; SA-100-87 PROPONENT : Puget Sound Power & Light Company PROJECT TITLE : Victoria Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION : Located at 2915 East Valley Highway TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON November 13, 1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED I ( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 2149N ENVIRONMENTA L CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: Octmber 30, 1987 I COMMENTS DUE: November 13, 1987 EFC - 084- - 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SA-100-87 PROPONENT: Puget Sound Power Light Comratiy PROJECT TITLE: Victorial Park Substation BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application fora Site Plan Approval to construct an electrical distribution substation on 1.1 acre. LOCATION: Located at 2915 East Valley Highway C SITE AREA: BUILDING AREA (gross): IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1 Form 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 28 , 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: GOOD SHEPHERD GROUP HOME FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED Proposal to rezone a .847 acre parcel from R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning to G-1 (General Use) zoning and application for a conditional use permit to develop a six resident, six bedroom group home for the developmentally disabled on the subject site. Property located on the south side of N.E. 19th Street at the 3900 block, between Union Avenue and Shelton Avenue N.E. ECF-010-88 ; R-010-88 ; CU-010-88 N/ RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA 'Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a new eight-plex cinema consisting of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats on the site of existing three-plex cinema which will be demolished. Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. ECF-090-87; SA-103-87 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the • Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 28, 1988, AT 9: 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: June 17, 1988 rr. f10110Ea `PUBLIC HEARINd»'"" RENTON HEARING EXAMINER "'= RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY AFFIDAVIT IDAVI'1r OF PUBLICATION THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS;REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUN- CIL' CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND ;FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON,WASH- Audrey .Fenner ,beingfirstdulyswornonoathstates jINGTON, ON JUNE 21, 1988, AT 9:00 that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the !A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING 1 PETITIONS:• RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE Application to rezone eight(8) lots (115' x VALLEY DAILY NEWS '350')1.92 acres located at the northwest •'corner Intersection of South 5th Street and • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Williams Avenue South from R-3(Multiple- ,`Family Residential) to B-1 (Commercial)to Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers l thisa bsiete.Thise prop salrincllude th ee unnde- are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six 'veloped lots, one lot developed.with a sin- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published gle family home and four lots;developed in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kent King !with medical services, under a conditional g use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Williams Avenue South. ECF-001-088; newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for R-001-88 ; KingCounty. RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA .Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cin- '•' ema (20,000 sq. ft.'and 1,405 seats) to The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition s operate:as_an eight-plex cinemafor a new , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in ;„;total of:36,253:sq1 ,260 seats.). Located In`the Renton' it a`complex at supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers - 25 South Grady,Way. ECF-090-874 SA-` during the below stated period.The annexed notice a 103-87 r " iv o f ice of Public !fearing Legal ,descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building was published on .T vine 1(1 , 1 '•4 RR R5 t)6 2 and Zoning Department. 'ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING.ON JUNE 21, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. (' '` Published in the Valley Daily News June sum of $ 30 •4 U 10,1988.R5062 Acct.#51067 I • Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 2 nd day of June igE.;8 Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11186 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON • A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JUNE 21, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE Application to rezone eight (8) lots (115' x 350')/.92 acres located at the northwest corner intersection of South 5th Street and Williams Avenue South from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to B-1 (Commercial) to enable future commercial development at this site. This proposal includes three undeveloped lots, one lot developed with a single-family home and four lots developed with medical services, under a conditional use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 Williams Avenue South. ECF-001-088; R-001-88 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA I Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20,000 / sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. ECF-090-87; SA- 103-87 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 21, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: June 10, 1988 // L6 OF R�11. a ® Z ry DTI C o 09gTep SEPZE��P • City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold a PUBLIC HEARING in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON JUNE 21, 1988 BEGINNING AT 9 :004.M. P.M. COiVCERNING: ECF-090-87 ,RENTON VILLAGE 87 CINIMA APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINIMA (20, 000 SQ. FT. AND 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT- PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 SQ. FT. AND 2,260 SEATS. tar I_ o p_-- \` /. /'\ R-3 e-.ii,<IL-- L .-" /�_- B� - U , . 4. '://7-- 1 1 <,, \\I ti . . ,. 1 1 p ' ' ' : -e-'-.—'' H [ . w - " 1 ? L 1.. I i Q I I,_ •'' o v,/, $ '_(LI VAPA 0 / I pliII H B - I / ' . 41, 'L. J I Ai. sutboi # 1 l : f �II� � .y ''r Illirr. 05 Ffiag,C; ill :: (3:t 6_1" :r11.1111111_ ' . 5.0 I 1 moo. sr, /7" l l ,l_ ::_i____ _:=,________,j___ i _ 1 _411 INT_ E.R' `-'7....1.-.!:1:: , / 1! r► _ _____ ---- . 8.4 ---- -- -4*. ' plogs- mEtrzr' t, 'i--44,,,r1 -Ill 1R-4 nil -- i I ) l II ,: ill ./s-:::: \ .."414 1 7 I ,. . 11 ,.�11►i• , to : .. \ -- / a e icy n .11 I:o z Q! }'a-- I•I 1•err. ,... GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH. GRADY WAY. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE . REMOVED .WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION y , , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING . . RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY. HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON ..NA A.1 loon , AT 9:00 . A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20,000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. ECF-090-87; SA- 103-87 Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON OU1l�C 2.1, S 0183 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : �U IUI, 10, I61'0 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, URIZ"S f. l-iN.)D , HEREBY CERTIFY TH T I i S COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN IX- ' CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARYBY THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PR SCRIBED BY LAW. ATT E ' ed and sworn to before me, a No for the State of Washington �,� ,,� DATE OF POSTING : q'88 704u Z AR day'OY'"\U IDI,c: I�1�C9' on M..v,-,.--.,'-"p.-0,i• r•tt e;.;;; 01,..c4: 70 SIGNED: OQJkivvc °•BUG. .. • ,zoa► lsF 0 F `NP io#' • #214 J • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING On the /° 1 41 1 day of 924U1 , 1988, I deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing � 'e A-1 documents. This information was sent to: __ : p�-.. .44 ff u e. i,/see' NAME: REPRESENTING: /P- U.iil./ u42.e2 0-C'1 axe✓ • SIGNED BY: _a/9 GL,/ �� U SUBSCRI5 &-:..1. ND SWORN to before me this / 3 , day of 00 epl�g .2ki:`', , 1988 . 1� 1�'4S\O EXdO o•.<��v k :v o Nota y Public in and for1t._yaq-) e,= C____ e State of Washington, k*'• PU01.�G�o,�;moo`$ residing at RE-n ) �J , therein. Proje tjgA Afid Number: gyiTilL, l/,�1 ) J g(..F 090 - €7 •S,Q - /D3-E7 A - CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 9, 1988 Renton Village Associates 607 Third Avenue, Suite 315 Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: PUBLIC HEARING - RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EC-090-87, SA-103-87 A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for Tuesday, June 21, 1988. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have • any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, (:)04 • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: Brian Cloepfil DKE:cs 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 EAEMORANDUM 41► To F I LE Date 6/8/88 From OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER Subject AAD-039-88 - RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES ON June 7, 1988 at 1 :30 P.M. in the Renton District Court, parties from City Hall (Don- Erickson) and those representing the Appellant, gathered for the above referenced hearing. This was an appeal of ERC conditions on the proposed expansion, having to do with drainage plans and exterior open space. . As the hearing began it was determined that an agreement had been worked out with staff, and there was no need to hear the matter further. The Hearing Examiner proceeded to dismiss the matter. ' Staff was in agreement. t% ® CITY OF RENTON "LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering MEMORANDUM DATE: June 6, 1988 TO: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: Renton Village Associates — Movie Theatre Storm Drainage Conditions The Renton Village conditions imposed by ERC need attention. Our requirement: "Applicant shall submit an acceptable drainage plan to the Department of Public Works prior to the Public Hearing for site plan approval ." The area of the Renton Village Shopping Center has been studied by FEMA (copy of map attached), and approximately one—half of the site floods up to the depth of 2 1/2 feet. The existing theatre also has flooded in the past two years, suffering property damage. The City and WSDOT have a joint interagency agreement for construction of a 132" diameter storm culvert to provide 100—year flood flow capacity south from the shopping center to the Panther Creek Swamp. This pipe is designed and under contract by Kewit Pacific Construction Co. of Vancouver, Washington. The City of Renton is obligated to pay about $300,000 for this pipeline and Renton Village previously agreed to contribute $60,000 for a portion of this storm pipe. To make the new 132" culvert effective, the newly planned storm system upstream, across the theatre site, must also be designed accordingly to accommodate the 100—year storm flow. The theatre site work proposes more culverting of the existing Rolling Hills Creek using 48" pipe. Public Works position is: 1 . The Rolling Hills Creek should be designed to convey the 100—year design storm flow with the storm water kept out of the building. A design report is required to develop. 2. Public Works prefers an open channel stream rather than a closed storm sewer on this project. Expanding the site parking over the existing creek is not preferred. Maintenance and repairs are much more difficult in a closed culvert system. 1D.10.13.REB:mf gij Attachment s� cc: Dick Houghton 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 103 - en 4Y/ CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney FROM: John R. Adamson, Program Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Renton Village Cinema Traffic Calculations DATE: June 6, 1988 PLEASE REPLY BY: Based upon our review of the Draft Grady Way Traffic Benefit Study, Gary A. Norris, Traffic Engineer, recommends that the Renton Village Cinema be assessed $13,594.00 as their portion of the traffic mitigation costs for the Grady Way corridor. Assumptions: 1. There are 53,500 existing trips on Grady Way. 2. Growth will add an additional 51,970 trips. 3. The improvement cost is $3,168,000.00 ! A 4. The cost per trip is $3,168,000.00/51,970 = $60.96. 5. Based on trips per square foot of addition, the Cinema will generate an additional 223 daily trips. 6. The new trips 223 x $60.96 = $13,594.08 (traffic mitigation fee for Renton Cinema.) J n R. Adamson cc: Gary A. Norris, Traffic Engineer fi r - - rv3 41 ® w CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Y Y Design/Utility Engineering MEMORANDUM CITY OF RENTON DATE: June 6, 1988 II IN h 198E TO: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator - Larry Warren, City Attorney BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: Renton Village Associates - Movie Theatre Storm Drainage Conditions The Renton Village conditions imposed by ERC need attention. Our requirement: "Applicant shall submit an acceptable drainage plan to the Department of Public Works prior to the Public Hearing for site plan approval ." The area of the Renton Village Shopping Center has been studied by FEMA (copy of map attached), and approximately one-half of the site floods up to the depth of 2 1/2 feet. The existing theatre also has flooded in the past two years, suffering property damage. The City and WSDOT have a joint interagency agreement for construction of a 132" diameter storm culvert to provide 100-year flood flow capacity south from the shopping center to the Panther Creek Swamp. This pipe is designed and under contract by Kewit Pacific Construction Co. of Vancouver, Washington. The City of Renton is obligated to pay about $300,000 for this pipeline and Renton Village previously agreed to contribute $60,000 for a portion of this storm pipe. To make the new 132" culvert effective, the newly planned storm system upstream, across the theatre site, must also be designed accordingly to accommodate the 100-year storm flow. The theatre site work proposes more culverting of the existing Rolling Hills Creek using 48" pipe. Public Works position is: 1 . The Rolling Hills Creek should be designed to convey the 100-year design storm flow with the storm water kept out of the building. A design report is required to develop. 2. Public Works prefers an open channel stream rather than a closed storm sewer on this project. Expanding the site parking over the existing creek is not preferred. Maintenance and repairs are much more difficult in a closed culvert system. 1D.10. 13.REB:mf Attachment (J cc: Dick Houghton 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 1, ' CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER Earl Clymer, Mayor Fred J. Kaufman May 18, 1988 Thomas A. Goeltz DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES 2600 Century Square 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Re: Appeal by Renton Village Associates AAD-039-88 Dear Mr. Goeltz: The appeal hearing you requested on behalf of the Renton Village Associates has been scheduled for 1: 30 P.M. on Tuesday, June 7, 1988 in Courtroom #3 of the RENTON DISTRICT COURT (see map attached) . Due to time constraints and availability of all parties concerned; we would appreciate adherence to the above date and time. Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, FRED J. KXUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER FJK/dk cc: Lawrence Warren, City Attorney Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Members of the ERC Committee Melanie Gain, District Court Administrator 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2593 DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE ' 150I FOURTH AVENUE ' SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1688 (206)622-3150 THOMAS A. GOELTZ OP vrNTON May 16, 1988 L' E tl ti E MAY Office of the Hearing Examiner Z( \�N+` City of Renton Municipal Building Sixth Floor 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Appeal by Renton Village Associates; ERC Conditions for Renton Village Cinema Expansion: ECF-090-87 Application No. SA-103-87 Dear Examiner: We are filing the enclosed Notice of Appeal for several conditions imposed by the Environmental Review Committee as part of the Declaration of Nonsignificance (Mitigated) for a cinema expansion. We are continuing to work with City staff to resolve these matters prior to the scheduled site plan hearing of June 21, 1988, but are filing this appeal in the event my client and the City staff are unable to work out a satisfactory resolution of the issues . If these issues remain unresolved, we may submit a memorandum to further clarify the status or highlight the differences. Very truly yours, DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES Thomas A. Goel z 3279L Enclosures cc: Larry J. Warren, Renton City Attorney Michael Sandorffy, RVA Loren Laskow, RVA Brian Cloepfil, The Callison Partnership Donald Erickson, City of Renton TELEX: 328919 DWI SEA • TELEcoPIER: (206) 628.7040 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON . RICHLAND, WASHINGTON ' WASHINGTON, D.C. I / 1 2 3 4 BEFORE THE CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 5 6 In Re Ap peal of ERC Conditions ) 7 for Renton Village Cinema: ) RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, ) FILE NO. ECF-090-87 8 ) APPLICATION NO. SA-103-87 Appellant. ) 9 ) 10 I . 11- INTRODUCTION 12 Renton Village Associates has submitted a site plan 13 application and environmental checklist for expansion of an 14 existing three-plex cinema to operate as an eight-plex cinema. 15 The expansion is for an additional 16,253 square feet and 855 16 seats (the existing cinema is 20, 000 square feet and 1,405 17 seats; hence, the new eight-plex will have a total of 36,253 18 square feet and 2,260 seats) . The site is located within the 19 Renton Village Shopping area. General Cinema Corporation, 20 which currently operates the cinema, will continue to operate 21 the expanded cinema . 22 The ERC issued its Declaration of Nonsignificance 23 (mitigated) on April 6, 1988 (copy attached) , and the comment 24 period has expired with no comments having been submitted. To 25 6 917G 1 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES -A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS , .000 CENTI;RY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,\ASHINGTON 99101.1688 // 1 ' the Applicant ' s knowledge, there has been no other appeal filed 2 regarding the site plan ap proval or the DNS. 3 The ERC attached six mitigating conditions to the DNS. 4 This ap peal involves Condition 3 (drainage plan) and 5 Condition 5 (traffic fee) . A "provisional" appeal is being ) 6 filed regarding Condition 1 (exterior open space) and 7 Condition 4 (exterior design) , but staff has indicated the 8 revisions and submittals on those two items are acceptable. 9 Consequently, q y, we would expect no appeal action or decision 10 since we would expect the Building Department/ERC to confirm at it the hearing that these conditions have been satisfied. 12 II . 13 APPEALED CONDITIONS 14 A. Drainage Plan. 15 The ERC has proposed the following drainage condition: 16 17 Condition 3 . That the Applicant submit an 18 acceptable drainage plan to the Department of Public Works prior to the public hearing 19 for site plan approval. 20 The Applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage plan showing 21 the size and location of the drainage pipe. Based on 22 subsequent discussions with staff, the Applicant will commit at 23 the hearing to revise that preliminary plan to provide for a 24 72-inch pipe (the current preliminary plan calls for a 48-inch 25 6917G 2 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES :\PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS .hOG LENTI'RY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE S F.\rrLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 �1 1 pipe) and will add one or more oil-water separators as 2 appropriate. Although the Applicant has indicated it will make 3 these revisions, the Department has not indicated whether the 4 preliminary design, as revised, is an "acceptable drainage 5 plan" which has been submitted prior to the public hearing. 6 If the preliminary plan is not acceptable to the Department of Public Works because it is a preliminary and not a final 8 design, we would then appealre quest the condition and re uest that it 9 be amended to provide that no final drainage design plan be 10 required until a building g permit application is submitted for 11 the cinema expansion. Since the State Department of 12 Transportation is still in its preliminary design phase for the 13 drainage culvert under I-405, it is not possible nor prudent to 14 prepare a final drainage design now for this project. The 15 state ' s design of the I-405 culverting is critical to the 16 cinema ' s final design, particularly for the elevation of 17 discharge from Renton Village Associates ' pipe into the state 18 system. 19 Consequently, we propose any requirement for final drainage 20 plans be deferred until Renton Village Associates submits a 21 building permit application. 22 Proposed Action: The Applicant ' s existing 23 preliminary drainage plan be amended by requiring a 72-inch (rather than 48-inch) 24 pipe and by addition of oil-water separator(s) as required by the Department 25 6917G 3 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS _(Nu,LEN IL"RY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE `LATTLE,U'ASHINGTON 98101-1688 1 of Public Works . Final drainage plans shall 2 be submitted with the building permit application for the cinema expansion. 3 B. Traffic Fee. 4 The ERC imposed a traffic impact fee as follows : 5 Condition 5. That the Applicant agree to 6 participate in the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit Assessment District. The increase in traffic is estimated at 223 trip 7 ends and the benefit assessment cost 8 $43 , 931. 00. The Applicant is willing to pay a fair share, but appeals 9 this condition for several reasons . First, the Benefit 10 District was not in existence at the date the site plan 11 application was submitted, and hence when the Applicant ' s 12 rights vested. To the Applicant ' s knowledge, the District 13 still has not been formed. Consequently, there is no authority 14 to assess fees based on a future district. 15 Second, the Applicant also was vested, at the time of the 16 application, to the SEPA policies the existing which legally 17 can be utilized to impose mitigating conditions . The Applicant 18 is not aware that the City has adopted formal SEPA policies 19 regarding traffic impact fees applicable to this project, and 20 the city has not designated in writing any adopted SEPA 21 policies for this particular fee as required by SEPA 22 regulations WAC 197-11-660(1) (b) ; Renton Code 4-2822(8) . 23 Consequently, the Applicant appeals the authority of the City 24 25 6 917G 4 DAVIS WRIGHT St JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS CENTL RY SQUARE•1501 FOURTH AVENUE :EATTLE. ASHINGTON 0810i-1088 1 to impose a traffic impact fee based on a non-existent district 2 and without SEPA authorization through adopted policies. 3 Third, the Applicant appeals the specific numbers (trips 4 and costs per trip) utilized in ERC Condition 5 . The City 5 erroneously states that the "increase in traffic is estimated 6 at 223 trip ends . " In fact, the increase will be no more than 86 trip ends per day. The Applicant retained The Transpo Group 8 to prepare a traffic study for the Renton Village cinema 9 expansion. The study was submitted to the City and is part of 10 the record on ap peal. Transpo found that the expansion would 11 contribute 51 trips at the maximum average p peak hour. The 12 daily increment (which, in fact, is only an afternoon and 13 evening increment due to the theatre' s hours) are for 86 trips 14 per day for the expansion increment. 15 The Cityhas not explained where its p purported 223-trip 16 increase came from, but the Transpo study did reference the 17 baseline trips for the existing theatre at 140 trips which, 18 when combined with the expansion increment of 86, yields 19 226 trips for the evening g (or daily) average. Since baseline 20 traffic has been in existence for numerous years and is not an 21 impact of the expansion p p project, a traffic impact fee based 22 upon existing trip volumes is clearly erroneous . Any 23 mitigation should be based on the 86 trips added by this 24 project . 25 6917G 5 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES • A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS -Soo CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98101.1688 1 The Applicant also appeals the proposed assessment cost of 2 $43 , 931. This yields the per trip charge of $197 ($43, 931 3 223 trips = $197/trip) . The City has provided no justification 4 nor explanation of how this number was derived, except that it 5 is the per trip fee amount used in the Lind Avenue Improvement 6 District. There is no legal or logical basis to use such a 7 number for a different assessment district where the 8 improvements and traffic conditions of necessity will be 9 different. One of the legal requirements of such a fee is that 10 it have a rational nexus to the impacts and costs of 11 mitigation. It would be a highly improbable coincidence that 12 the specific traffic improvements adopted for the Southwest 13 Grady Way District would yield a cost, when spread over the 14 proposed traffic increases for the Grady Way area, would yield 15 the same per trip cost as in the Lind Avenue District. In 16 fact, the City has indicated to the Applicant that the 17 anticipated rate would be approximately pproximately one-third of the Lind 18 Avenue rate, or approximately $65-$70 per trip. 19 In sum, we appeal the authority of the City to impose any 20 traffic impact fee in light of statutory requirements under 21 SEPA, RCW 82 . 02 . 020 and the Applicant ' s vested rights as 22 confirmed by West Main Associates v. Bellevue, 106 Wn.2d 47 23 (1986) and RCW 19 .27 . 095 . Further, the number of trips is 24 incorrect . Finally, the derivation of the cost per trip is 25 unspecified and is appealed ppealed as unsubstantiated. 6 917G 6 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2U00 CENTURY SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE•WASHINGTON Q8101-1688 -n 1 Proposed Action: Notwithstanding the 2 Applicant ' s belief the City lacks authority to impose a traffic fee under the 3 circumstances here, the Applicant proposes to pay a fee not to exceed $6, 000 for 4 traffic improvements covered by any future assessment district ($6, 000 approximates 86 5 trips times $70 per trip per day) . 6 C. Provisional Appeal Regarding Usable Exterior Open Space. 7 The ERC imposed the condition regarding open space as 8 follows : 9 Condition 1: That the Applicant develop more usable exterior open space that is not 10 adversely impacted by vehicular noise, principally from I-405 . [The ERC further 11 noted to the Applicant that a more urban 12 approach should be taken with a plaza in front of the theatre. ] 13 Since the ERC condition was imposed, the Applicant has 14 submitted a revised design to install a plaza area in front of 15 the theatre. We understand the redesign and plaza areas has 16 satisfied Condition 1 and will request staff to confirm this at 17 the hearing . 18 D. Provisional Appeal of Exterior Design. 19 The ERC imposed an exterior design condition as follows : 20 Condition 4 . That the Applicant develop a more urban vernacular for the proposed 21 cinema noting that it is sited in a highly visible area . 22 After imposition of this ERC condition, the Applicant has 23 submitted a new building facade to the City. Again, staff has 24 25 6 917G 7 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS _001 LENTL'R1 SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE F A'ITLE, X'ASHINGTON 98101.1688 1 indicated this revision has satisfied Condition 4 , and we 2 expect staff to confirm this at the site plan hearing. 3 III . 4 CONCLUSION 5 Based upon the foregoing, the Applicant respectfully 6 requests that the "Proposed Action" listed regarding 7 Conditions 3 and 5 be adopted to revise the ERC mitigation 8 measures and site plan approval . 9 DATED this I(v day of A4A1 , 1988 . 10 11 DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES Attorneys for Applicant Renton 12 Village Associates 13 ‘ ,;2.L.m.1 14 By Thomas A. Goel ;d4"< tz 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6 917G 8 DAVIS WRIGHT&JONES LAW OFFICES .\PAR ENERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS _(o0 I.ENTI RI SQUARE'1501 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE,Q.ASHINGTON 98101-1688 APR 14 ''3 08:11 CRLLISON PAPTNEPSHIP 2206-6234625 P.6/6 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-090-87 APPLICATION NO(S) ,: SA-103-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20,000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. PROPONENT: Renton Village Cinema LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. CONDITIONS 1. That the applicant develop more usable exterior open space that is not adversely impacted by vehicular noise, principally from 1-405. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A more urban approach should be taken. A "porta Cochier" could be provided near the front of the theatre that would function both as a plaza and pedestrian/vehicular drop off pick-up zone. 2. That all fill placed on the site be certified by a licensed geo-technical engineer as to its cleanliness and source of origin. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The geo-techs shall submit a brief report to the Department of Public Works prior to the placement of any such fill material on site. 3. That the applicant submit an acceptable drainage plan to the Department of Public works prior to public hearing for site plan approval. 4. That the applicants develop a more urban vernacular for the proposed Cinema noting that it is sited in a highly visable area. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The Committee disagrees with the notion that this is a typical suburban type mall situation, noting adjacent buildings include two multiple stor_y_o.ffice__-_.__-__ buildings as well as a multiple story hotel. 5. That the applicant agree to participate in the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit . Assessment District. The increase in traffic is estimated at 223 trip ends and the benefit assessment cost $43,931.00; and 6. That the applicant submit a performance bond of at least $2,000.00 to ensure that streets are kept clean of debris and dirt during construction activities. .;PP 14 S PP S 08:=1 CALLISON PTNEPSHIP 206-6234625 P.5i6 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-090-87 APPLICATION NO(S),.: SA-103-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20,000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight- plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. PROPONENT: Renton Village Cinema LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. LEAD AGENCY: Building and Zoning Department, City of Renton. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet). These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from April 11, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., April 26, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen D14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: April 6, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: April 11, 1988 . / / Ro ald G. Nelson j ' Building and Zoning Director . Spri ger olio§ evel ent Director Richard C Houghton Public Wo s Director • RENTON VILLAGE MANAGEMENT CORPORA1iON (206) 228-3000 EVERGREEN BUILDING • SUITE 509 • 15 SOUTH GRADY WAY • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 FAX (206) 235-8007 May 16 , 1988 Mr. Donald Erickson Zoning Administrator City of Renton V" II I II ) Building i 1j'I Building and Zoning Department ''�'�' -�- � i�� .� 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 S•, ;,, RE: Renton Village Cinema Expansion Dear Don, Because we were unable to connect by telephone last week and because I will be gone on business this week, I thought I would drop a note to give you an update on some items, we discussed on May 12 . • General Cinema has been advised as to the design . of the theater that the City would find acceptable for the site. I will be visiting with General Cinema this week and I will discuss it in further detail with them. Our design team will be putting together in further detail plans for the public space that you also found acceptable, Larry Klotz , ORB, discussed the drainage issue with Garth in Public Works; Chuck Price was unavailable. I am quite concerned about this issue because when first approached, Garth had not seen anything regarding this site plan. Shortly thereafter, Larry was advised by Garth, who evidently is on Chuck Price' s staff, that he "wanted a 132 inch drain on the theater site to match the $tate' s design" . I am sure you will agree that a 132 inch pipe is absurd, I have asked Larry to continue his efforts to get in touch with Chuck 'Price to settle this issue. I spoke with Bob Throckmorton, Metro Sales and Marketing, and we (( will meet when I return to schedule the Metro survey at One, Two and Three Renton Place. Bob has advised Bob Flor of their desire to expand the type of , survey that was scheduled to be done at just Three Renton Place. ith Thank yoi for your assistance in this project and we look forward to the resolution of all .the mitigations and the completion of this project. Sincerely, 720-22.AxL A•14/6-64_,- 6,,f7).2) Loren Laskow Executive Vice President cc : Brian Cloepfil Larry Klotz Noo E ENVIRONMENTAL. DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-090-87 , SA-103-87 APPLICANT RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20, 000 SO,. FT AND 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATED AS AN EIGHT PLEX CINEMA FOR A- NEW TOTAL OF 36, 253 SQ. FT. AND 2, 260 SEATS . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES 1>ILDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1 WILL ILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., MAY 16, 1988 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 4 yl NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ORIG N A L RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MAY 24, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: URBANIAK, BRANDT & HESS REZONE Application to rezone approximately 3.5 acres of property from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to B-1 (Business Use) for future commercial use. The property is located south of N.E. 43rd Place (S.E. 80th street) and west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. (ECF-007-88; R-007-88) HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHURCH Application for a rezone of the R-1 zone to P-1 zone according to the Comprehensive Plan, and application for a•conditional use permit for the expansion of the present church on the same parcel. The B-1 zones parcel would be fully developed for church parking. Total site is 7.5 acres in two parcels. Located at 3031 N. E. 10th St. (ECF-003-88; R-003-88; CU-003-88) ANNETTE HICKS, DAY CARE CENTER Application for conditional use permit to allow a day care facility having approximately 2,800 square feet (utilizing an existing Single Family Residence) to be located in a G-1 (General- Single Family) zoned district. The project is intended to provide day care for 50 children. A portion of the required access, parking and landscaping for this project may be located on property adjacent to the subject site through legally recorded easements running with the land and valid for the life of the project. Located at 3324 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. (ERC-009-88; CU-009-88) ) RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20,000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF-090- 87; SA-103-87) Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 24, 1988, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: May 13, 1988 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Application for preliminary plat approval to allow a twelve (12) lot single family subdivision on 2 . 56 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place. (ECF-13-87 ; PP-013- 87) RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA "I Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36, 253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. ECF-090-87 ; SA-103-87 Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton Hearing Examiner by 5: 00 p.m. May 16, 1988 . Published: May 2, 1988 I. $vi . - CITY OF RENTON p BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT UN Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director April 28, 1988 Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 142 Third Avenue, #300 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Renton Village Cinema Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. ECF-090-87; SA-103-87 This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non- Significance - MITIGATED for the above referenced project. No comments were received. The following conditions are the mitigating measures for the project 1. That the applicant develop more usable exterior open space that is not adversely impacted by vehicular noise, principally from I-405. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A more urban approach should be taken. A "porta Cochier" could be provided near the front of the theatre that would function both as a plaza and pedestrian/vehicular drop off pick-up zone. 2. That all fill placed on the site be certified by a licensed geo- technical engineer as to its cleanliness and source of origin. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The geo-techs shall submit a brief report to the Department of Public Works prior to the placement of any such fill material on site. 1 3. That the applicant submit an acceptable drainage plan to the_ Department of Public Works prior to public hearing for site plan approval. / 4. That the applicants develop a more urban vernacular for the proposed Cinema noting that it is sited in a highly visable area. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The Committee disagrees with the notion that this is a typical suburban type mall situation, noting adjacent buildings include two multiple story office buildings as well as a multiple story hotel. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Renton Village Cinema April 28, 1988 Page 2 5. That the applicant agree to participate in the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit Assessment District. The increase in traffic is estimated at 223 trip ends and the benefit assessment cost $43,931.00; and 6. That the applicant submit a performance bond of at least $2,000.00 to ensure that streets are kept clean of debris and dirt during construction activities. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 16, 1988. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for Jeanette Samek-McKague. or 'e - viron al Re .mmittee, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator PC: Renton Village Associates prl4day DKE:sr.cs N { — METRD Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 April 20, 1988 CITY OF F?E N1TON L © Ip V E API7 221998 Environmental Review Committee City of Renton BUILDING.8 ZONING KEPT 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : ECF-090-87 Renton Villiage Cenema Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsa .0A-Ni-m9H yrd )c,111 u 1V1-(v)tAA0)0. 11 NON- 1 c O lnc,7N2 Noes r—o 0u 7-I i W021i c oiofJ Iu(vo9 CV01Jb>1,- 1tiu 1v714 9 Mfl1Q n( nols roc—AU :so &.1,19J )4-lo • fv6Sell - cAves,E-g-02 kelkvg ("475777 "41 • cZe cri4P6WINW/Wel7/Pd (,);./ g -9(a `1-400\1% ,4_19 ' J-*190 DNI V-mama 3tM10Ha NOLLVZINFI IO 30 =Z alid3 (CINII) � ,�� : cis) \At uq ;� :ems .14S :maim sxiroxa gg,� I , :aanualmoo 30 aLva W i/' l() )')Vc]/I I/ (`I 0,1.1 :jaroxa 30 3Wl moaax 331\ 112L RCO �U/U &SCA) 5it-/0311 )466/0Z6AJ/4 CITY OF RENTON 9 Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell - Mary deVuono, Assistant City Attorneys CITY OF RENTON June 23, 1988 1�' C E Q V E JUN241988 Thomas A. Goeltz, Esq. Davis Wright & Jones BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. 2600 Century Square 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101-1688 Re: Renton Village Cinema; Settlement Agreement Regarding Appeal of ERC Conditions Dear Tom: Thank you for your letter of June 15 , 1988 . With one minor exception, the letter is acceptable and mirrors our discussions . The one area of concern is in Paragraph 2 entitled, "Traffic Fee, " and ties that payment to the formation of a transportation benefit district . I do not want to tie the payment strictly to the formation of a transportation benefit district, but would also like it to include a traffic mitigation district formed by official city council action, or a similar vehicle established by official city council action providing a plan for installation of necessary traffic improvements, establishing the proposed funding for such improvements, and establishing a fund into which monies can be paid for financing of the proposed improvements . I suppose that the vehicle I have just described closely parallels the Public/Private Transporation Act of 1988 as well as a transportation benefit district or, alternatively, a SEPA traffic mitigation district. At this time I don 't know which vehicle the city will utilize, and therefore I don't necessarily want the city tied to a transportation benefit district . Additionally, there is some discussion about a legal challenge to a transportation benefit district because of its ad valorem taxing powers . If the ad valorem taxing powers were removed, I could see the legislature repealing the statute and introducing remedial legislation . I don't know what that would do to the agreed upon conditions . If you wish to discuss this with me further, please let me know. If not, perhaps we can discuss amendments to your letter that will satisfy our mutual concerns . Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (2061 255-8678 Thomas A. Goeltz, Esq. June 23, 1988 Page 2 Thank you for your cooperation in resolving this problem, and the prompt nature of your letter agreement . Very r ly ours, /fl Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor Don Erickson Dick Houghton Ron Nelson Larry Springer A8 . 25 : 01 . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building March 23, 1988 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ron Nelson, Chairman; Larry Springer, Policy Development Director; Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Earl Clymer, Mayor; Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant; Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner; John Adamson, Project Development Coordinator; Carolyn Sundvall, Recording Secretary. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. CONTINUED: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20;.000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. Property located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF-090-87; SA-103-87) Don Erickson gave background information. He briefed the Committee and circulated a letter from the applicant dated March 8, 1988, in which the applicant had responded to the request for additional information prior to recommendation on the site plan approval. Concern was expressed for the road alignment and the applicant had been asked to clarify what the alignment would be. Don felt that the driveway entrances should be kept away from the elbows on the street. Discussion then took place. Larry Springer brought up the concern whether it should be a private or public road. Most of the road is now public and it is a major cross route. It was suggested that the speed limit be 25 mph. Larry felt that it needs to be a public street he agrees that it would be a cut off for Grady and Talbot intersection. Other issues were: the placement of Puget Power transmission lines on the edge of the right-of-way and the lose of a large greenbelt area . Don stated that a number of issues still remain unresolved. How the road is developed and the standards for the whole site are really important. Ron stated that Jerry Lind had written to Puget Power to try to work with them on the landscaping under the powerlines. DECISION: Ron made a motion to keep the roadway public, seconded by Larry Springer. The project will be brought back for the next ERC meeting. Don Erickson stated that a lot of the issues would carry over to the site plan review. WILLETT Application for site plan approval to allow a seven-unit apartment building. Applicant previously proposed eight (8) units on site. Property located at 354 Taylor Ave. N.W. (ECF-077-087; SA-088-87) Don Erickson gave background information on the project. He stated that there are no major impacts since we saw it last. The applicant took out a unit on the lower level and made it into a community room. He stated that the project had some slope issues because of the steepness of the site. John Morris had some concerns about the Rainier Bike Trail bypass. The Committee then reviewed the conditions listed on the Staff Report and discussion took place. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to accept staff recommendations and issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the six conditions listed on the Staff Report. Larry Springer seconded the motion. Carried DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Application for preliminary plat approval to allow a twelve (12) lot single family subdivision on 2.56 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place. (PP-013-87) Jeanette Samek-McKague gave background information on the project. The critical question with the preliminary plat application was that the applicant was serving the plat by a cul-de-sac street. The Committee asked that they get secondary access because of the length of the cul-de-sac, either through the north end of the plat or work with the property owner immediately to the west. They have now come in with a design and Swanson Homes is going to purchase the property. Two major issues that the Committee had discussed before was secondary access and because the site is wooded, whoever developed it would need to provide a tree survey to retain as many trees as possible. DECISION: Defer ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 1 0:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building April 6, 1988 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ron Nelson, Chairman; Larry Springer, Policy Development Director; Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant; Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner; Carolyn Sundvall, Recording Secretary. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. CONTINUED: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20,000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. ECF-090-87; SA-103-87 Don Erickson gave background information on the project. He stated that the issues that are significant are road right-of-way, storm drainage and traffic impacts. The ERC then reviewed the recommendation and conditions set forth in the Staff Report and discussion took place. Larry Springer expressed a concern that the conditions did not show traffic calculations on the increased daily trips. He asked that Gary Norris respond to this request, and that it be added as a mitigated measure. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Determination of Non-Significance with the conditions listed on the Staff Report including calculations on the increased daily trips. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Application for preliminary plat approval to allow a twelve (12) lot single family subdivision on 2.56 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place. ECF-010-87; PP-013-87 Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that the project had been deferred a year ago because the cul de sac exceeded 500 feet in length and the Committee had determined that a secondary access plan was needed. The applicants have now provided this secondary access road. The ERC members then reviewed the Staff Report and discussion took place. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the one condition listed on the Staff Report. Larry Springer seconded the motion. Carried. RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER Application to rezone eight (8) lots (115' x 350')/.92 acres located at the Northwest corner intersection of South 5th Street and Williams Avenue South from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to B-I (Commercial) to enable future commercial development at this site. This proposal includes three undeveloped lots, one lot developed with a single-family home and four lots developed with medical services, under a conditional use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 Williams Avenue South. (ECF-001-088; R-001-88) Don Erickson gave background information on the project. He stated that the Committee had previously considered issuing a Declaration of Significance due to the fact the applicant submitted a rezone application without specifying future use of the property. He stated that we are dealing with eight lots of which the southern four are currently used for an existing medical clinic facility. The northern half of the site is currently vacant. The committee then considered a contract rezone subject to site plan and discussion took place. Larry Springer suggested that the ERC review the site plan concurrently with this rezone. He expressed concern that the site is going from a R-3 designation to a higher density use without any understanding of the potential impacts. DECISION: Don will meet with Roger Blaylock to discuss these ERC concerns. i c ERC Minutes April 6, 1988 page 2 A THE VYZIS COMPANY (SOUTHGATE OFFICE PLAZA) Application for special permit for fill and grading permit to allow the filling of approximately 14,320 cubic yards of material on 20.9 acres of property. Note: Site was previously filled with permit no. SP-134-78. Property located on the west side of Lind Avenue S.W. between the 1900 to 2300 block. (ECF-088-87 and SP-102-87) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated this application was reviewed at the same time as Alaska Distributors. We had asked the applicants to work with us, until the P-1, P-9 Channel was resolved, as we didn't want to issue a Determination of Significance. The applicant responded that they were anxious to proceed and that. a portion of the site is already above the flood plain, which they would like to have the option to finish off. The areas below the flood plain would be left alone. Some grading would be done for better drainage. They would avoid any fill below the 100 year flood plain The lower. area would be used for parking. Larry Springer stated that we are just looking at a fill permit. Discussion then took place. DECISION: Ron Nelson stated he would like staff to look at the project further. Especially Bob Bergstrom and Nancy Lazwell-Morris. A motion to defer was unanimously approved. NEW PROJECTS: ANNETTE HICKS DAY CARE CENTER Application for conditional use permit to allow a Day Care facility for 50 children having approximately 2,800 square feet (utilizing an existing Single Family Residence) to be located in a G-1 (General-Single Family) zoned district. Property located at 3324 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. (ECF-009-088/CU-009-088) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that this is next to a shopping center and is presently an existing single family dwelling. Hours of operation will be from 6:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. The site is very constrained and they are proposing access from Sunset Blvd. In so doing, they may be denying access to a larger site. Dick Houghton stated that this is a high volume area and not suited for children. Larry Springer expressed concerns about public health, safety and welfare. DECISION: Ron Nelson asked that the project go back to staff because of traffic questions and building code concerns on conversion from single family to a commercial use. A motion to do this was unanimously adopted. URBANIAK. BRANDT & HESS REZONE Application to rezone approximately 3.5 acres of property from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to B-1 (Business Use) for future commercial use. The property is located south of N.E. 43rd Place (S.E. 80th street) and west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. (ECF-007-88; R-007-88) Don Erickson briefed the ERC on the project. He stated that this was a non-project action. The applicant wants a B-1 rezone south of Exit 7. Because they are consistent with the Comp plan done in 1980, there was no EIS that addressed traffic impacts. Discussion then took place. Don Erickson felt that it was not timely because of an abundance of B-1 commercial in the area already that is undeveloped and we are contemplating major land use studies in this area. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance and that the Hearing Examiner be made aware of the timeliness factor. Larry Springer seconded the motion. Carried. OTHER Letter to ERC regarding proposed Kenworth Truck Plant, PACCAR Defense Systems Site. Don Erickson reviewed the letter with ERC members. He stated that a concern at this time, is that there is no application or project description. He stated that the two issues are: 1) Who the Consultant will be. 2) The City's control over the process. The other issue is that we have been following an administrative procedure for EIS consultant selection and that the applicant had conflicting information on how to proceed. He reviewed the selection process with the ERC. Discussion then took place. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to meet with the proponent and explain the City's process and ask the applicant for a checklist with a description of the project, so they know that this is the first step. Larry Springer seconded the motion. Carried. - - ; ---NOTICE OF • :... - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION EENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE .RENTON,WASHINGTON - --- Audre y IIe nne r ,bein first sworn on oath states The Environmental Review Committee g duly (ERC)has issued a Determination of NON- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED for the follow- project(') under the authority of 'Rentoning Municipal Code. The Applicant(the') VALLEY DAILY NEWS havecompleted mitigation process pursu antt to WAC AC 197-11-350. • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition DOa f PRELLWITZ Application on for preliminary plat approval to 'allow a twelve(12)lot single family subdivi- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers tsion on 2.56 acres of property. Property are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published kPlace RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA . in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Application for,site plan approval to allow County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal the expansion( ,000'qof anf existingad 1,405thre seats)e to ,ema (20,000•sq. ft. and to newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new King County. total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. Located in the Renton Village Complex at 25 S.Grady Way.ECF-090-87;SA-103-87 ' The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Further Information regarding this actionla available in the Building and Zoning , Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in Department, Municipal Building, Renton, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Washington,235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the City of Renton during the below stated period.The annexed notice a Hearing Examiner by 5:00 p.m. May 16, • Public Notice p1988. t" Published: May 2, 1988 Valley Daily was published on may 2 , 1 9 e n B 5 0 3 8 News R5038 Account x51067 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 24 . 32 Subscribed and sworn to before me t 's 6 th day of May 19 88 d2-Z Notar blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. VDN#87 Revised 11/86 CITY OF RENTON RECEIVED JUN 10 1988 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. HAD - c y Iry 1., • DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES LAW OFFICES • A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE • 150I FOURTH AVENUE • SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810I-1688 (zo6)622-3150 THOMAS A. GOELTZ ��• 7 a #@,lV�E + 't E C June 15, 1988 JUN 17 1988 C91Y OF Mr. Lawrence J. Warren HEARING � E�+��-®� Renton City Attorney MINER 100 S. Second Street P.O. Box 626 Renton, Washington 9.8057 Re.: Renton Village Cinema; Settlement Agreement Regarding Appeal of ERC Conditions Dear Larry: Renton Village Associates has dismissed its appeal of ERC conditions imposed as part of the Renton Village Cinema expansion (ECF-090-87; Application No. 8SA-103-87) based upon our resolution of appealed conditions as follows : 1. Drainage. Through Don Erickson and Bob Bergstrom, Renton Village Associates will satisfy Condition 3 (requiring submission of an acceptable drainage plan by the site plan hearing date) retaining the existing open ditch and removing the existing paved parking area, including the buried 48-inch drainage culvert, now located behind the theatre (i .e. , south portion of the site) to develop open-ditch drainage with the capacity for a 100-year storm. A revised drainage plan reflecting this open-ditch system will be submitted prior to or at the site plan hearing on June 21. Final drainage submittal will be at the time of the building permit application for the cinema expansion. 2 . Traffic Fee. Renton Village Associates has agreed to pay a voluntary traffic mitigation fee in the amount of $13, 594 to be paid at the time the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit Assessment District is established. At the appeal hearing, Mr. Erickson stated he did not want to tie the payment to any LID, but rather wanted the funds committed only to the Transportation Benefit District. That is acceptable to Renton Village Associates . Consequently, ERC Condition 5 would be amended by substitution of the amount of $13, 594 rather than the stated total assessment cost of $43,391. TELEX:328919 DWJ SEA • TELEcorIER: (206)628-7040 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON • RICHLAND, WASHINGTON • WASHINGTON, D.C. Mr. Lawrence J. Warren Page 2 3 . Exterior Open Space. The provisional appeal of Condition 1 (exterior open space) is dismissed based upon Mr. Erickson' s confirmation that the revised plaza area design in front of the building is satisfactory. A revised site plan drawing showing the plaza area has been submitted for consideration at the June 21 site plan hearing. 4 . Exterior Design. The provisional appeal of Condition 4 (exterior design) is dismissed based upon Mr. Erickson' s approval of the revised building facade. We have submitted a revised plan, and will submit a color rendering prior to the June 21 site plan hearing. If you believe we need a different form of document to reflect the settlement of these appeal issues, please let me know. Otherwise, I propose our agreement be in the form of this letter agreement and I request you execute and return the enclosed copy of this letter to me. Thank you for your assistance and attention on the traffic issue. Very truly yours, DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES • Thomas A. Goe z TAG:bjw Enclosur cc: nton Hearing Examiner (Mr. F. Kaufman) Michael Sandorffy Loren Laskow Brian Cloepfil Don Erickson ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY CITY OF RENTON By Lawrence J. Warren Renton City Attorney DATE: 0750L 1/. ,re 11 V (rpti/4 ( , /7... _..._............. . AQ /� � NIA da- d 011A14 • el. 1,.1 - ------- ___ _ ___ -----e :/-jr,, /../. 30 ; ilii't- 11 Ai/ - - fill( %/ _ /4 '.___' / .fi 1' / r�// / it/0;h 4f�f ,; `-‘ . if ' I ,, 159011111Mirirf I -- . - ----j- "1."(,'" I' isiiii ' LI _ ,istri,vimiramie . ' . , _f (/ � ,A / 7 r‘ A,' ' i 1 RP L ;//Ii1/!0/I''ffk �ii'�"r�I/r�`��%�I`:�/11i/fL.1►�r //a -;�: �r JI , ----__ /f L� / � � -1g— -- 111::j V J �� 1/ 0 . r r 46. %.• CITY. OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director April 7, 1988 .Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1423 Third Avenue, #300 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: • Renton Village Cinema ECF-090-87; SA-103-87 Gentlemen: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on April 6, 1988 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: • 1. That the applicant develop more usable exterior open space that is not adversely impacted by vehicular noise, principally from I-405. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A more urban approach should be taken. A "porta Cochier" could be provided near the front of the theatre that would function both as a plaza and pedestrian/vehicular drop off pick-up zone. 2. That all fill placed on the site be certified by a licensed geo • - technical engineer as to its cleanliness and source of origin. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The geo-techs shall submit a brief report to the Department of Public Works prior to the placement of any such fill material on site. /,' ��f/ l / / / Anuo) (pe tit r ��btG `r��Jl�t�N/�°� 4 �I7� 1 That the applicant s mit an acceptable drainage plan to the 3.0l Department of Publi Works prig to public hearing for site plan �(� 1/ / approval. ,j,/ £t& 6 4ti 07110/dt'tQQ Gvltlo -{(Cj O'7 �3 j'P OAP Pj"e n07- i i #1c 4. That the applicants develop a more urban vernacular for the proposed Cinema noting that it is sited in.a highly visable area. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The Committee disagrees with the notion that this is a typical suburban type mall situation, noting adjacent buildings include two multiple story office buildings as well as a multiple story hotel. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 April 7, 1988 Page 2 5. That the applicant agree to participate in the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit Assessment District. The increase in traffic is estimated at 223 trip ends and the benefit assessment cost $43,931.00; and • 6. That the applicant submit a performance bond of at least $2,000.00 to ensure that streets are kept clean of debris and dirt during construction activities. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end April 26, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For he Environm al R iew C nmittee, t( ti Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: Renton Village Associates ercdetlr DKE:sr / ,- r / / 0 - t$ 10 CITY OF RENTON ,.IL k s BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director April 11, 1988 Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 142 Third Avenue, #300 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Renton Village Cinema, ECF-090-87 ; SA-103-87 Dear Mr. Cloepfil: Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, Please call me at 235-2550 . ��. ely, // Zeica________> t I Dona d K. Erickson, ACIP Zoning Administrator Enclosure PC: Renton Village Associates Dept. of Ecology Dept. of Wildlife Gerald W. Marbett Dept. of Fisheries Gregory Bush 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 rf/ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-090-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-103-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight- plex cinema for a new total of 36, 253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. PROPONENT: Renton Village Cinema LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. LEAD AGENCY: Building and Zoning Department, City of Renton. The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency. Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340.. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from April 11, 1988. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , April 26, 1988, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 DATE OF DECISION: April 6, 1988 EFFECTIVE DATE: April 11, 1988 70,Zeg-e 'Ronald G. Nelson �' Spri ger Building and Zoning Director olick evel. ent Director Richard C Houghton Public Wokks Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATION MEASURES ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-090-87 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-103-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36, 253 sq. ft. and 2 ,260 seats. PROPONENT: Renton Village Cinema LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. CONDITIONS 1. That the applicant develop more usable exterior open space that is not adversely impacted by vehicular noise, principally from I-405. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A more urban approach should be taken. A "porta Cochier" could be provided near the front of the theatre that would function both as a plaza and pedestrian/vehicular drop off pick-up zone. 2 . That all fill placed on the site be certified by a licensed geo-technical engineer as to its cleanliness and source of origin. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The geo-techs shall submit a brief report to the Department of Public Works prior to the placement of any such fill material on site. 3 . That the applicant submit an acceptable drainage plan to the Department of Public Works prior to public hearing for site plan approval. 4 . That the applicants develop a more urban vernacular for the proposed Cinema noting that it is sited in a highly visable area. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The Committee disagrees with the notion that this is a typical suburban type mall situation, noting adjacent buildings include two multiple story office buildings as well as a multiple story hotel. 5. That. the applicant agree to participate in the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit Assessment District. The increase in traffic is estimated at 223 trip ends and the benefit assessment cost $43 , 931. 00; and 6. That the applicant submit a performance bond of at least $2, 000. 00 to ensure that streets are kept clean of debris and dirt during construction activities. Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL • DETERMINATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee Audrey Benner (ERC) has issued a DETERMINATION OF ,being first duly sworn on oath states NON-SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED for the that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton'Municipal Code. The Appli- cant(s) have completed a mitigation pro- cess pursuant to WAC 197-11-350. VALLEY DAILY NEWS �'AppicatoAoPpeL m nary plat approval to • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition p allow a twelve(12)lot single family subdivi- ;r sion on 2.56 acres of property. Property locateDaily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers , Place.(ECF-13-87;the 2300 block ofN.E. 13th PP-013-87) are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six 1 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published ' Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cin- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King ema (20,000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal ' operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for totalo rto located36,a Ins the ft. and 2,260 seats. Property in the Renton Village corn- King County. plex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF-090-87; SA-103-87) iThls decision will be finalized in 15 days. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Written comments received after 5:00 p.m. Renton Edition X Auburn Edition April 26, 1988, will not be considered. A , (and not in fourteen (14) day appeal period will corn- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers mence following the finalization of DNS-M. during the below stated period.The annexed notice a The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Public Notice Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Build- was published on April 11, 1988 R5 0 2 4 Ing,Renton,Washington.Phone 235-2550. PUBLISHED: April 11, 1988 Valley Daily News R5024 Account#51067 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $ 27 . 36 rv- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19 th day of April 198 8 i Nota lublic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, .1, King County, Washington. 1 I �; , �; (� ` r i F.\ VDN#87 Revised 11'86 11 . I I t5 &11H NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE - MITIGATED for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The Applicant(s) have completed a mitigation process pursuant to WAC 197- 11-350. DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Application for preliminary plat approval to allow a twelve (12) lot single family subdivision on 2.56 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place. (ECF-13-87; PP-013-87) RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three—plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1, 405 seats) to operate as an eight—plex cinema for a new total of 36, 253 sq. ft. and 2 , 260 seats. Property located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF-090-87 ; . SA-103-87) This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m. April 26, 1988, will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington. Phone 235-2550. PUBLISHED: April 11, 1988 pub041188/pubdoc MEMORANDUM DATE: April 8, 1988 CITY OF RENTON TO: Jeanette Samek-McKague TECEOVE,-1 FROM: Gary Norris 1 4\P 11198 SUBJECT: Renton Cinema - SA-103-87 BUILDING /ZONING DEPT. We have used the projected increase in traffic from Table 3 , page 10 of the Environmental Checklist Study to establish a fair basis for the participation of the Cinema in the benefit district. The increase in traffic is estimated at 223 trip ends and benefit assessment cost of $43 , 931. 00. 4u10EM:ad CEM97 • iTERO 511F I 1..D;104‘ 0 DATE: 4*,\QA)L,-11 Ict.b.25 TO: a\ck\jeA\Q0„R..2A,_ APR 7- 1988' FROM: , olikeiTz SUBJECT 2:).1 6•-• .1g;'"AY' • , AY1-15-\ 4o-t-3-w-N • 5Allt31, • -VRAP<c•-re\-c, AQ4 do eL_ 11--t • —1-12Ac ---k re--E) AA-4—) 6-ksL. , il..-v:i .L�/,':i:l':, . i� _J>_-„.4 : • _ p1 ��s ? z "` , r J,: �,,., c� �(I. -. TG: 87288.00 4 �.r vim', >>,{� ) { P I �,;. : _ _ y / ,.... Table 3 := .1. Theater Trip Generation Existing Project Total Condition Increment W/Project Average Day 72/63 PM Peak (4:00 - 5:00 PM) 45/39 27/24 Evening (8:30 - 9:30 PM) 140/140 -:86/86 226/226 9-o1-, 3 i Peak Day PM Peak (4:00 - 5:00 PM) 225/255 137/137 362/362 Evening (8:30 - 9:30 PM) 534/534 325/325 859/859 Key: XXX/XXX = enter/exit On an average-day, the expanded theater would add 51 vehicles trips (27 entering, 24 exiting) to the PM peak hour traffic volumes. On the three to five annual peak days, 650 vehicle trips (325 entering, 325 exiting) will be introduced in the evening 8:30 to 9:30 PM period. This represents the maximum vehicle trips generated by the expanded theater and will most likely occur on a weekend or holiday. Traffic Distribution and Assignment Figure 5 shows the estimated project trip distribution. Approximately • one-half of the theater patrons approach the site via S Grady Way and one-half approach via Talbot Road S. The existing and estimated PM peak hour trips • _ that would be added by the project are shown in Figure 6. As is shown, the relative impact of added PM peak hour trips due to the expanded theater will be slight since the trips represent less than 1 percent of the traffic on S Grady Way and on Talbot Road S. The majority of theater-related traffic will occur during off-peak periods when the local roadways have excess reserve capacity. -10- ATtACHMENT # 14 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA TRANSPORTATION SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Prepared for: Renton Village Associates November 11, 1987 CITY OF R,ENTC;.J NOV 2319v r",r;DTa Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98007 2. • • 111 TG: 87288.00 This report addresses the transportation element of an environmental checklist for the proposed reconstruction and expansion of the Renton Village Cinema from three screens and 1,405 seats to eight screens and 2,260 seats. Little published information is available to assess the traffic and park- ing impacts of theater projects. However, in 1985 The TRANSPO Group performed an operational study for the expansion of the Factoria SRO Cinema located in King County just south of Bellevue. The theater was recently expanded to eight screens and enjoys good attendance. General Cinema Corporation, pro- posed operators of the Renton Village Cinema, has compiled attendance and vehicle occupancy data for all of their sites nationwide. The data on the Factoria exceeds the General Cinema Corporation's national averages. In order to represent a reasonable worst case for the Puget Sound area, the Factoria Cinema data will be applied to the Renton Village Cinema analysis. The Factoria Cinema study showed that the highest attendance days are Friday through Sunday, with attendance up to five times greater than other days. In addition, three to five times per year, the theater complex exper- ienced attendance peaks when all segments of the theater were nearly full . These peak days occurred on holidays or weekends. For this study, figures reflecting average Friday attendance were used. Additionally, the impact of the peak days, though infrequent, was assessed. Local Public Street System and Site Access The project site is located at the northwest corner of the I-405/SR 161 (E Valley Highway) interchange in the City of Renton as shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 indicates the local roadways which serve the site, including I-405, SR 167/Rainier Avenue S, S Grady Way, Talbot Road S (SR 515) and S Renton ,Village Place. Primary site access is via a driveway on S Grady Way at Lake Avenue and an entrance at S Renton Village Place from Talbot Road S. S Grady Way is a four-lane, two-way arterial providing east-west site access. At the signalized intersections, exclusive left and/or right-turn lanes are provided as indicated in Figure 2. Parking is prohibited on S Grady Way and there are sidewalks on the north side of the street only. -1- r/__. ,. . • • 9 / . . . 4.S ik. 4.4. S2ST S3ST 00 v. SUNSET VI S ,. W 9 —c -e` x co a = Sw 7 sT • PARK ARIOE• PROJECT SITE REIR08 / VILLAGE It 1-405 '• /,y�f6��0�'li1 .. cal ir "' a {}#s N E N T O N 4.4 r 0 :;i r? as `:jj S 9 LONGACRES RACE TRAC>; f ..c • NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 1 Efkg CINEMA SITE LOCATION . TRANSP0 -2- I `f. • • .p ot • J o SGuA5 " "`t C:\\1 W r Itt Wit. -- 1rn1�I1f flENTON II VILLAGE Pl. ft PROPOSED EXPANDED THEATER /// SITE 1-g05 eC N O 32( O J t0 aC TRAFFIC SIGNAL !, STOP SIGlt NORTH Figure 2 RENTON VILLAGE ADJACENT ROADWAY TRANSIaO CINEMA CONFIGURATION AND CONTROL Group • -3- • TG: 87288.00 Talbot Road S (SR 515) is a five-lane, two-way north-south arterial com- prised of two travel lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane. There is no parking allowed on Talbot Road S and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street. S .Renton Village Place is a two-lane, two-way local access roadway with separate left and right-turn lanes at Talbot Road S. Parking is allowed on the south side of the street and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. Intersection control is also shown in Figure 2. Traffic signals are located at both major site access points. Existing PM peak hour turning movement counts were performed at the pri- mary site access points in October 1987. Based on 1985 Highway Capacity Manual methods, the intersection of S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S operates at LOS E and the intersection of Talbot Road S at S Renton Village Place operates at LOS B during the PM peak hour. The PM peak hour is 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Public Transit Transit routes and bus stop locations are shown on Figure 3. The South Renton park-and-ride lot is located just north of the site. The majority of area bus service is oriented towards peak-hour commuter service. Route 155 is the only route to provide service during theater peak hour operation. On weekdays, service is provided from 5:30 AM to 10:00 PM at approximately one-hour headways. Route 155 serves Downtown Renton, the South Renton park-and-ride lot, Fairwood, Cascade Vista, and Southcenter. The nearest transit stop is located on Talbot Road S at S Renton Village Place approximately 1,500 feet from the Renton Village Cinema. Parking 0 The project site is now occupied by the Evergreen Building, an office building occupying approximately 73,800 square feet (sf) of gross leasable floor area (glfa), and by the existing three-screen Renton Village Cinema. -4- • II SOUTH RENTON PARK 'N' RIDE 145 148 - 149 247 . ---7 155 167 S 172 �� 240 �`� 247 11° c7; �� 340 247 909 N W e H = S°' I-W N ",....---\ (......./....---) /,_,---, D ------' T1 n , -2) 145 ....---"*".Th 148 149 RENTON 155. VILLAGE PL A rf• PROPOSED 145 149 I EXPANDED 148 155. THEATER I t 7SITE �05 ! I , L ' ...... h eC f/J O I- I-'• O C A J H N 32/ TRAFFIC SIGNAL A BUS STOPxxx xxx ROUTE NUMBERS NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 3 CINEMA PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSPO -5- • $ TG: 87288.00 / , The site parking demand must consider both uses. To assess the parking- related impacts of the theater expansion, four times of day will be examined -- the average event parking demand and the peak event parking demand, for both daytime (7:00 AM to 4:00 PM) and evening conditions. Parking Demand and Supply The office building parking demand can be estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (1985). The parking demand for the theater can be estimated based on experience at Factoria. The Factoria study showed that average vehicle occupancy for a theater is 2.5 persons per vehicle. Film showings at multi-screen theaters are normally staggered in about 15 to 20 minute intervals and film length averages about two hours. The staggering of shows reduces the parking requirement to one-half of the total theater occupancy during a two-hour show period (versus having all showings at once with the parking demand then equal to 100 percent of occupancy). Some overlap will occur from the prior show period; but this overlap did not exceed four percent in the Factoria experience. Table 1 shows the parking demands for the four times specified. Table 2 shows the existing and future parking supply. The parking demand does not currently exceed the supply at any time. Table 1 Parking Demand Average Day Peak Day Existing Future Existing Future Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Office 185 Negl* 185 Negl* Negl* Negl* Negl* Negl* Theater 50 240 75 370 230 550 380 880 Totals 235 240 260 370 230 550 380 880 * Office building holiday, weekend, and evening parking demand data is unavailable. Some demand exists due to maintenance/janitorial personnel and overtime and swing-shift workers, but is assumed negligible (Negl ) at less than 10 vehicles on average. -6- • = TG: 87288.00 Table 2 Parking Supply On-site Off-site Total Existing 611 0 611 Future 569 220* 789 * Via pending joint-use parking agreement with adjacent owner. The daytime theater parking demand will average 75 vehicles and the even- ing demand will average 370 vehicles after the theater is expanded. The on- site supply of 569 spaces will be more than adequate to handle the average weekday demand. The expanded theater will exceed the supply only during the evening period (8:30 to 9:30 PM) of the three to five annual peak days. At those times, the demand will exceed the on-site supply by 311 spaces. Overflow of 220 spaces will be accommodated by the adjacent proposed joint-use parking lot at the One Renton Center building (see Code Requirement section, below). The remaining excess parking demand of 91 spaces can be easily accommodated by using other adjacent office and retail parking without causing spillover onto City streets. These peak days occur on weekends or holidays when offices are usually closed. Code Requirement The City of Renton code requirement for theaters is one space per four seats. This results in a requirement for 565 spaces. The Evergreen Building requirement is for 369 spaces. In addition there is an existing parking easement to One Renton Place for 56 spaces on site. A total of 990 spaces should be provided on site if code is met. Due to the dissimilar peak hours of office building and theater uses, it has been proposed that a joint-use parking agreement be entered into between the One Renton Center building owners and the Renton Village theater owners to cover the 220 spaces located just east of the theater (see Figure 4). -7- /j//////: ' -. -' • 0 . • • .........^ T �" oI ...::. _........._........._.._...._.___/ • 0• • L.� L ,; 1 ; r 1111 1 aLIMIT OF (i 1 SITE PLAN APPROVAL 188 [I L L i. ........,•-11, -:.1;•ittifi••:;;:;;;f:%.:f...:-:.?...t:,;.....'..::•-::4 ••%...:. ..‘‘.. . i` t :. Z1 iv�•.`{•':•• _ 1: � ��2 •' lti,\.;.�y},•:-Mtiti��:v:'• •{•.11•..{..''is•:v ~• `•:.-'b:.....n.t....-.--..may: -�`:`;:�::. v 1\8' `- .i:-Y•'•'•4:'�.1.:{{•v-' \ iv'•.tiv. ,\.\,v v 1 11.• v•v:Y..' ¢.gyp '\':.: �`�.•\: «�...w :.. ..;,::''.?. vim'y:i• `�.:':??~.�:::tit\ i PROJECT SITE :?:-yy::.:.{:°<t•-,. :? .0 SEPARATELY OWNED PARKING PROPOSED FOR JOINT-USE • SOURCE: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP RENTON VILLAGE Figure 4 Ilk-) CINEMA FUTURE PARKING SUPPLY � 5� -8- 411/ TG: 87288.00 The joint use with One Renton Center will work well to alleviate most peak parking demands that may occur and will allow the expanded theater to meet parking code requirements. The 220 spaces will likely experience high use by theater goers since they are close to the theater. Roadway Improvements The proposal will not require new roadways or improvements to existing roads and streets. Water, Rail , and Air Transportation There will be no alterations to water, rail , or air transportation due to the proposed theater expansion. Project Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment The existing Renton Village Cinema consists of three theaters with a total of 1,405 seats. The proposed rebuild would add five theaters and bring the total to 2,260 seats. Trip Generation Based upon the Factoria analysis, the expected theater utilization during the four analysis periods (average and peak day, daytime and evening) was determined. Theater traffic activity peaks during the 8:30 to 9:30 PM hour. A factor of 2.5 persons per auto was used to represent average vehicle occupancy, based upon the experience at Factoria. Each vehicle makes two trips -- one to the theater and one away from the theater. Based upon the patronage characteristics during the four analysis periods, traffic activity was estimated and is shown in Table 3 for both the existing theater and the expanded theater. -9- • TG: 87288.00 Table 3 Theater Trip Generation Existing Project Total Condition Increment W/Project Average Day PM Peak (4:00 - 5:00 PM) 45/39 27/24 72/63 Evening (8:30 - 9:30 PM) 140/140 ✓,2.86/86 226/226 Peak Day PM Peak (4:00 - 5:00 PM) 225/255 137/137 362/362 Evening (8:30 - 9:30 PM) 534/534 325/325 859/859 Key: XXX/XXX = enter/exit On an average-day, the expanded theater would add 51 vehicles trips (27 entering, 24 exiting) to the PM peak hour traffic volumes. On the three to five annual peak days, 650 vehicle trips (325 entering, 325 exiting) will be introduced in the evening 8:30 to 9:30 PM period. This represents the maximum vehicle trips generated by the expanded theater and will most likely occur on a weekend or holiday. Traffic Distribution and Assignment Figure 5 shows the estimated project trip distribution. Approximately one-half of the theater patrons approach the site via S Grady Way and one-half approach via Talbot Road S. The existing and estimated PM peak hour trips that would be added by the project are shown in Figure 6. As is shown, the relative impact of added PM peak hour trips due to the expanded theater will be slight since the trips represent less than 1 percent of the traffic on S Grady Way and on Talbot Road S. The majority of theater-related traffic will occur during off-peak periods when the local roadways have excess reserve capacity. -10- _ . .. 111 S ________Y c7<<Q laN W ti SG 1. W D'5 9�_____2 ,,,, AEHTON VILLAGE PL PROPOSED /C EXPANDED (---It: THEATER SITE vItts 35% H O aC H O m J C. A _ r -.--.. 32C TRAFFIC SICTIAL a NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION TialM1SP° CINEMA row. -11- _ . .. (/. - .--o 0 mi.... J I L —9(10) A �-3(0) 1137(0)—► 1159(0) 167(12)--,,k. p— 14(1) S __t � -4 sc7' S� - o .. \ to CV CV eQ. �'iNN N taJ <( y Li 56ppp'l�p'l y I . Y J r 0 C"\ (--) 0 ...------ );:( (......„---n in RENTON VILLAGE PI • PROPOSED EXPANDED THEATER �� SITE vgQS . (aLD ;,--. / . N O O - i �O F- vtp tff.n U-7° ) i 178(4)—� ti 438(8)- ,1/4 1._i_t TRAFFIC SIGNAL XXX E EX. PM PEAK vo (XXX)E� PLUS PROJECT TRIPS ^ A.PROJECT TRIPS NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 6 �5P° CINEMA PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES Grove -12- • TG: 87288.00 On-site Circulation The expanded theater will contribute approximately 51 vehicle trips to the existing PM peak hour traffic on site. Typical on-site circulation patterns were observed during peak hour and are shown on Figure 7. The majority of on-site traffic does not pass in front of the theater or the Evergreen Building due to speed bumps located in front of these buildings. This pattern should not change with theater expansion. Pedestrian-vehicle conflicts are typical at theaters especially just before a show time. The expanded theater is likely to experience a degree of conflict just in front of the theater and on the west side of the theater. However, the parking lot has been designed to encourage only drop-off traffic to pass in front of the theater and minimize the number of potential conflicts. There has been a discussion in the past regarding the construction of a city street through the site as shown in Figure 7. However, the theater expansion will not generate sufficient traffic volumes to warrant construction of the road at this time. Recognizing the fact that the road will be con- structed at some future date, Ithe parking lots will be designed in a configuration that will easily adapt to a road installation. Reduction of Transportation Impacts From the preceding analysis and findings, we conclude that the proposed project will have a negligible traffic impact on the vicinity street system. No measures are required to reduce the transportation impacts of the project beyond those proposed. -13- S • $ • • k__________ _ --•-• _,Ailb iI 1 __________:_r iii I 1 ,.. r- T I 6___ 1 .!; . 1 ( i r ell ITC Fun[t ' G� j I I 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 r t l 1 1 • xio _____I_____ _._,:, iw.„.... .7. ...4,,.elf„tv_____. .•.. , i / ps Fr c- --v iv,-&,- 7 ..f „-s_ , LI i 1 1 . #/ I�� f TO TALBOT RD S , it yo. ,_v ji�%I . 9 P / V ' � y -_ice.. jr*/ E'` � �. • ..a SOURCE: A THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 7 CINEMA MAJOR SITE CIRCULATION PATTERNS TRANSpp Grov. -14- 4 •4-9 r 2149N ENrr1RuNMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 31, 1987 EFC - 090 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PI AN APPRnVAI Tfl AIiOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT ' IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources c--- 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare v" 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • "� 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities C--' COMMENTS: 1 . Developer should agree to participate in South/Southwest Grady benefit district at $197.00 per average increased daily trip generated. More information is needed from the traffic analysis as to what the average increased daily trip would be when generated. Present analysis only gives average peak hour trip 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. and 8:30 to 9:30 p.m. (22r3 ) 0 $197 x average new increased daily trips = $ - 3 -1 30 benefit district assessment 2. Assessment for benefit district to be provided by the development is $43,931 • ki5; t,, • NleAf r 4 DLO bow We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ) , G /7F7 / Signature of Dir it or"Authorized Representative Date 6rm 4 o :��= • CITY OF RENTON • "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director April 7, 1988 • Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. 1423 Third.Avenue, #300 Seattle, WA 98101 • RE: • Renton Village Cinema ECF-090-87; SA-103-87 Gentlemen: • This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on April 6, 1988 • decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop more usable exterior open space that is not adversely impacted by vehicular noise, principally from I-405. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A more urban approach should be taken. A "porta Cochier" could be provided near the front of the theatre that would function both as a plaza and pedestrian/vehicular drop off pick-up zone. 2. That all fill placed on the site be certified by a licensed geo- technical engineer as to its cleanliness and source of origin. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The geo-techs shall submit a brief report to the Department of Public Works prior to the placement of any such fill material on site. 3. That the• applicant submit an acceptable drainage plan to the Department of Public Works prior to public hearing for site plan approval. • 4. That the applicants develop a more urban vernacular for the proposed Cinema noting that it is sited in a highly visable area. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The Committee disagrees with the nation that this is a typical suburban type mall situation, noting adjacent buildings include two multiple story office buildings as well as a multiple story hotel. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 April 7, 1988 Page 2 5. That the applicant agree to participate in the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit Assessment District. The increase in traffic is estimated at 223 trip ends and the benefit assessment cost $43,931.00; and • 6. That the applicant submit a performance bond of at least $2,000.00 to ensure that streets are kept clean of debris and dirt during construction activities. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) clay comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end April 26, 1988. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for myself or Jeanette Samek-McKague. For he Environm al R iew C imittee, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator pc: Renton Village Associates ercdetlr DKE:sr N OT C E "` . - • N APPLICATION NO. ECF-090-87 , SA-103-87 APPLICANT RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA PROPOSED ACTION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20, 000 SO. FT. AND 1 ,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36, 253 SQ. FT. AND 2 , 260 SEATS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES 4 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL 54WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY APRIL 26, 1988 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building April 6, 1988 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ron Nelson, Chairman; Larry Springer, Policy Development Director; Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant; Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner; Carolyn Sundvall, Recording Secretary. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. CONTINUED: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20,000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. ECF-090-87; SA-103-87 Don Erickson gave background information on the project. He stated that the issues that are significant are road right-of-way, storm drainage and traffic impacts. The ERC then reviewed the recommendation and conditions set forth in the Staff Report and discussion took place. Larry Springer expressed a concern that the conditions did not show traffic calculations on the increased daily trips. He asked that Gary Norris respond to this request, and that it be added as a mitigated measure. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Determination of Non-Significance with the conditions listed on the Staff Report including calculations on the increased daily trips. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Application for preliminary plat approval to allow a twelve (12) lot single family subdivision on 2.56 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place. ECF-010-87; PP-013-87 Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that the project had been deferred a year ago because the cul de sac exceeded 500 feet in length and the Committee had determined that a secondary access plan was needed. The applicants have now provided this secondary access road. The ERC members then reviewed the Staff Report and discussion took place. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the one condition listed on the Staff Report. Larry Springer seconded the motion. Carried. RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER Application to rezone eight (8) lots (115' x 350')/.92 acres located at the Northwest corner intersection of South 5th Street and Williams Avenue South from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to B-I (Commercial) to enable future commercial development at this site. This proposal includes three undeveloped lots, one lot developed with a single-family home and four lots developed with medical services, under a conditional use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 Williams Avenue South. (ECF-001-088; R-001-88) Don Erickson gave background information on the project. He stated that the Committee had previously considered issuing a Declaration of Significance due to the fact the applicant submitted a rezone application without specifying future use of the property. He stated that we are dealing with eight lots of which the southern four are currently used for an existing medical clinic facility. The northern half of the site is currently vacant. The committee then considered a contract rezone subject to site plan and discussion took place. Larry Springer suggested that the ERC review the site plan concurrently with this rezone. He expressed concern that the site is going from a R-3 designation to a higher density use without any understanding of the potential impacts. DECISION: Don will meet with Roger Blaylock to discuss these ERC concerns. 'c ERC Minutes April 6, 1988 page 2 THE VYZIS COMPANY (SOUTHGATE OFFICE PLAZA) Application for special permit for fill and grading permit to allow the filling of approximately 14,320 cubic yards of material on 20.9 acres of property. Note: Site was previously filled with permit no. SP-134-78. Property located on the west side of Lind Avenue S.W. between the 1900 to 2300 block. (ECF-088-87 and SP-102-87) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated this application was reviewed at the same time as Alaska Distributors. We had asked the applicants to work with us, until the P-1, P-9 Channel was resolved, as we didn't want to issue a Determination of Significance. The applicant responded that they were anxious to proceed and that a portion of the site is already above the flood plain, which they would like to have the option to finish off. The areas below the flood plain would be left alone. Some grading would be done for better drainage. They would avoid any fill below the 100 year flood plain The lower area would be used for parking. Larry Springer stated that we are just looking at a fill permit. Discussion then took place. DECISION: Ron Nelson stated he would like staff to look at the project further. Especially Bob Bergstrom and Nancy Lazwell-Morris. A motion to defer was unanimously approved. NEW PROJECTS: ANNETTE HICKS DAY CARE CENTER Application for conditional use permit to allow a Day Care facility for 50 children having approximately 2,800 square feet (utilizing an existing Single Family Residence) to be located in a G-1 (General-Single Family) zoned district. Property located at 3324 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. (ECF-009-088/CU-009-088) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that this is next to a shopping center and is presently an existing single family dwelling. Hours of operation will be from 6:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. The site is very constrained and they are proposing access from Sunset Blvd. In so doing, they may be denying access to a larger site. Dick Houghton stated that this is a high volume area and not suited for children. Larry Springer expressed concerns about public health, safety and welfare. DECISION: Ron Nelson asked that the project go back to staff because of traffic questions and building code concerns on conversion from single family to a commercial use. A motion to do this was unanimously adopted. URBANIAK, BRANDT & HESS REZONE Application to rezone approximately 3.5 acres of property from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to B-1 (Business Use) for future commercial use. The property is located south of N.E. 43rd Place (S.E. 80th street) and west of Lincoln Avenue N.E. (ECF-007-88; R-007-88) Don Erickson briefed the ERC on the project. He stated that this was a non-project action. The applicant wants a B-1 rezone south of Exit 7. Because they are consistent with the Comp plan done in 1980, there was no EIS that addressed traffic impacts. Discussion then took place. Don Erickson felt that it was not timely because of an abundance of B-1 commercial in the area already that is undeveloped and we are contemplating major land use studies in this area. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance and that the Hearing Examiner be made aware of the timeliness factor. Larry Springer seconded the motion. Carried. OTHER Letter to ERC regarding proposed Kenworth Truck Plant, PACCAR Defense Systems Site. Don Erickson reviewed the letter with ERC members. He stated that a concern at this time, is that there is no application or project description. He stated that the two issues are: 1) Who the Consultant will be. 2) The City's control over the process. The other issue is that we have been following an administrative procedure for EIS consultant selection and that the applicant had conflicting information on how to proceed. He reviewed the selection process with the ERC. Discussion then took place. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to meet with the proponent and explain the City's process and ask the applicant for a checklist with a description of the project, so they know that this is the first step. Larry Springer seconded the motion. Carried. • r://> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA March 23 , 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at at 10:00 a.m. CONTINUED: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. Property located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF-090-87; ( SA-103-87) WILLETT Application for site plan approval to allow a seven-unit apartment building. Applicant previously proposed eight (8) units on site. Property located at 354 Taylor Ave. N.W. (ECF- 077-087; SA-088-87) DOUGLAS PRELLWITZ Application for preliminary plat approval to allow a twelve (12) lot single family subdivision on 2 .56 acres of property. Property located in the 2300 block of N.E. 13th Place. (PP-013- 87) NEW PROJECTS: POLYGON CORPORATION SUNPOINTE PHASE III Application for Final Planned Unit Development (FPUD) approval for Phase III of Sunpointe Condominiums to allow the construction of sixty (60) multi-family units on approximately 11. 62 acres of property. Property located west of southwest 5th Court and south of southwest Sunset Boulevard. (ECF-098-87; FPUD-111-87) RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER Application to rezone eight (8) lots (115'x 350 ' )/.92 acres located at the Northwest corner intersection of South 5th Street and Williams Avenue South from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to B-1 (Commercial) to enable future commercial development at this site. This proposal includes three undeveloped lots, one lot developed with a single-family home and four lots developed with medical services, under a conditional use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 Williams Avenue South. (ECF-001-088 ; R- 001-88) CITY CENTER MOTEL Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a new 93 unit motel. The project will include the demolition of the existing motel units and swimming pool. Property located at 112 South 3rd street. (ECF-073-87; SA-081-87) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS P1 CHANNEL - BOX CULVERT Applications or conditional use and substantial development permits to construct a box culvert which will be for rerouting Springbrook Creek under I-405. The box culvert is an element of the proposed Green River Eastside Watershed Project. Property located west of the proposed Oakesdale Ave. S.W. extension and to the east of Springbrook Creek. (ECF-008-88; CU-008-88 ; SM-008- 88) DISCUSSION: RENTON HONDA Proposed new Honda car dealership to be located at the N.W. intersection of S.W. Grady Way and Rainier Avenue South. BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK Letter from Barbara Moss of First City Developments in response to ERC letter of February 29th. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT March 16, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Renton Village Cinema PROJECT: Renton Village Cinema ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-090-87, SA-103-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1, 405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36, 253 sq. ft. and 2, 260 seats. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. B. ISSUES: 1. Whether the applicant has provided • storm drainage systems which offer adequate capacity and sufficient separation of oil/water to satisfactorily serve this site. The site is fully developed at the present time, with a storm drainage system in place. However, the new development will alter the amount of impervious surface impervious surface increasing it from 75% to 77% of the property, and will change the grade. As a result, the Engineering Department has indicated that additional drainage capacity will be required. The location/type of drainage system will be coordinated with the setting of structures and of parking areas. Increased traffic to be generated by the expansion of the cinemas may be expected to create more oily residue on the site. Oil/water separators should be installed to contain oil residue the site where it can be periodically collected and properly disposed of. 2 . Whether the applicant should be required to construct sidewalks adjacent to the Cinema complex, on the south side of S.W Grady Way? Building and Zoning Aenartment Environmental Review mmittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 2 The Uniform Building Code and the Renton Subdivision Code require off- site improvements, including, but not limited to "sidewalks, curbs, gutters and street paving. . . (extending the) full distance of such property to be improved upon" for improvements to commercial structures of more than $25, 000. 00 to commercial structures. The subject property is fully improved along Talbot Avenue. However, additional improvements may be necessary to accommodate increased pedestrian traffic generated by Cinema patrons. The perimeter along S.W. Grady Way includes curbs, gutters and street paving. Under the applicable regulations, the applicant (owner of the entire Renton Village site) will be required to install six foot wide sidewalks, to APWA standards, along the length of S.W. Grady Way adjacent to the site. Additional crosswalks may also be required across Grady Way to accommodate users of public transit. 3 . Whether sufficient information is provided to determine traffic impacts from this project and to establish the necessity for on-site mitigation systems and/or desirable levels of contribution to benefit traffic district assessment funds? While it is acknowledged that the proposed use will have less impact upon area traffic than many of the allowable commercial uses for the property, the potential exists for traffic flow difficulties at this site. Of particular concern is ingress/egress at Grady Way. In order to better determine the on-site impacts of the expanded Cinema, and to determine specific benefit district assessments for new increased daily trips, more information is needed from traffic analysis. Present studies only provide information about peak hour trips (4 : 00-5: 00 p.m. ) and 8 : 30 - 9: 30 p.m. trips. An analysis should be submitted measuring the number of new trips generated daily by the expanded project. 4. Whether sufficient provisions have been made for maintaining the area adjacent to the construction site free from debris during demolition and building of the project? This is necessary to properly address traffic mitigation. • Building and Zoning Department - Environmental Review 'mmittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 3 On-site debris will be created during the demolition/construction process. Facilities should be provided on site to wash down truck tires to prevent tracking of debris from the site to adjacent roadways. 5. Whether sufficient measures have been taken to provide aesthetic amenities (e.g. landscaping, open spaces, recreational opportunities) on site adjacent to the Cinema? Landscaping/open space developments which are centrally sited on this property at the present time are planned for relocation toward the periphery (adjacent to the I-405 corridor) . Parking spaces are planned for the vacated area. Parking spaces and landscaped areas proposed by the applicant do meet minimum requirements established by regulation. However the submitted plan lacks a number of characteristics which would make the site attractive and convenient for Cinema patrons and for other users over the life of the structure. The applicant should meet with City staff including the landscape planner and representatives of the Parks and Recreation Department to consider revision of plans for open space areas, pedestrian access to and through the property, landscaping and for parking waiting areas (e.g. , siting, accessibility, amenities, noise mitigation) . Revised plans should address improved aesthetics and safety. To further ensure the availability of adequate parking for this project, the applicant should execute a joint use agreement with One Renton Place. 6. Given the high visibility of the site from adjacent buildings and I-405 whether sufficient measures have been taken to ensure the sightliness of the complex, particularly in terms of: * Roof top screening. * Architectural integration of- signage * Night-time illumination and efforts to reduce visual glare. Building and Zoning n,z artment Environmental Review: mmittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 4 C RECOMMENDATIONS: The TAC recommends that the ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop more usable exterior open space that is not adversely impacted by vehicular noise, principally from I-405. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A more urban approach should be taken. A "porta Cochier" could be provided near the front of the theatre that would function both as a plaza and pedestrian/vehicular drop off pick-up zone. 2 . That all fill placed on the site be certified by a licensed geo-technical engineer as to its cleanliness and source of origin. • NOTE TO APPLICANT: The geo-techs shall submit a brief report to the Department of Public Works prior to the placement of any such fill material on site. 3 . That the applicant submit an acceptable drainage plan to the Department of Public Works prior to public hearing for site plan approval. 4 . That the applicants develop a more urban vernacular for the proposed Cinema noting that it is sited in a highly visable area. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The Committee disagrees with the notion that this is a typical suburban type mall situation, noting adjacent buildings include two multiple story office buildings as well as a multiple story hotel. 5. That the applicant agree to participate in the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit Assessment District; and 6. That the applicant submit a performance bond of at least $2, 000. 00 to ensure that streets are kept clean of debris and dirt during construction activities. D.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Reviewer made the following comment: ' Building and Zoning P�rartment Environmental Review mmittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 5 Truck tire wash down for tracking avoidance during any open soil phase. Fire Prevention Bureau: Reviewer made the following comments: 1. Provide adequate water flow for Fire Department. 2 . Building to be sprinklered through- out. 3 . Provide Fire Department access throughout construction. 4 . Combustible structural members not to be used inside the building until water system approved by the City. ' ' 5. Building to meet all fire, life safety codes adopted by the City. Design Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Provide additional drainage capacity across back parking lot. 2 . Provide minimum 1500 gallon oil/water separator for storm drainage system. 3 . Provide sidewalk improvements on Grady Way frontage. Traffic Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Developer should, agree to participate in South/Southwest Grady benefit district at $197. 00 per average increased daily trip generated. 2 . More information is needed from the traffic analysis as to what the average increased daily trip would be when generated. . Present analysis only gives average peak hour trip 4 : 00 to 5: 00 p.m. and 8 : 30 to 9: 30 p.m. $197 X average new increased daily trips = $ benefit district assessment. Utility Engineering: Parks and Recreation: The reviewer . made the following comments: 1. The proposed project as presented will have major negative recreation and aesthetic environmental impacts. A relatively large but poorly designed and, therefore, under- utilized centrally located open space is being eliminated and replaced by a much smaller non-centrally located open space closer to Renton's major noise generator, I-405. Building and Zoning nQnartment Environmental Review mmittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 6 The proposed open space area will primarily serve users of the Evergreen Building while the existing poorly designed open space has the potential to not only serve users of the Evergreen Building, but users of other Renton Village facilities as well. The area surrounding the existing open space is under landscaped and will be even more so if it is converted to parking. Nothing has been proposed for _ the remaining triangular open space that is outside the project boundary. It is already next to useless, and if the proposed project is approved as presented, there will be no doubt about its lack of value. 2 . See attachment for additional comments. Building Division: Zoning Division: Computer failure Comments will be available. Policy Development: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. The checklist mentions a lot line adjustment as part of this request. However, a lot line adjustment is not shown on the site plan. 2 . Approval of this project should be contingent upon the execution of a joint use parking agreement between the Cinema and One Renton Place. \ . BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE . STAFF REPORT March 16, 1988 • A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Renton Village Cinema PROJECT: Renton Village Cinema ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-090-87, SA-103-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36, 253 sq. ft. and 2, 260 seats. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. B. ISSUES: 1. Whether the applicant has provided storm drainage systems which offer adequate capacity and sufficient separation of oil/water to satisfactorily serve this site. The site is fully developed at the present time, with a storm drainage system in place. However, the new development will alter the amount of impervious surface impervious surface increasing it from 75% to 77% of the property, and will change the grade. As a result, the Engineering Department has indicated that additional drainage capacity will be required. The location/type of drainage system will be coordinated with the setting of structures and of parking areas. Increased traffic to be generated by the expansion of the cinemas may be expected to create more oily residue on the site. Oil/water separators should be installed to contain oil residue the site where it can be periodically collected and properly disposed of. 2 . Whether the applicant should be required to construct sidewalks adjacent to the Cinema complex, on the south side of S.W Grady Way? / . Building and Zoning De lment Environmental Review C iittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 2 The Uniform Building Code and the Renton Subdivision Code require off- site improvements, including, but not limited to "sidewalks, curbs, gutters and street paving. . . (extending the) full distance of such property to be improved upon" for improvements to commercial structures of more than $25,060. 00 to commercial structures. The subject property is fully improved along Talbot Avenue. However, additional improvements may be necessary to accommodate increased pedestrian traffic generated by Cinema patrons. The perimeter along S.W. Grady Way includes curbs, gutters and street paving. Under the applicable regulations, the applicant (owner of the entire Renton Village site) will be required to install six foot wide sidewalks, to APWA standards, along the length of S.W. Grady Way adjacent to the site. Additional crosswalks may also be required across Grady Way to accommodate users of public transit. 3 . Whether sufficient information is provided to determine traffic impacts from this project and to establish the necessity for on-site mitigation systems and/or desirable levels of contribution to benefit traffic district assessment funds? While it is acknowledged that the proposed use will have less impact upon area traffic than many of the allowable commercial uses for the property, the potential exists for traffic flow difficulties at this site. Of particular concern is ingress/egress at Grady Way. In order to better determine the on-site impacts of the expanded Cinema, and to determine specific benefit district assessments for new increased daily trips, more information is needed from traffic analysis. Present studies only provide information about peak hour trips (4 : 00-5: 00 p.m. ) and 8: 30 - 9: 30 p.m. trips. An analysis should be submitted measuring the number of new trips generated daily by the expanded project. 4. Whether sufficient provisions have been made for maintaining the area adjacent to the construction site free from debris during demolition and building of the project? This is necessary to properly address traffic mitigation. Building and Zoning De---tment Environmental Review C iittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 3 On-site debris will be created during the demolition/construction process. Facilities should be provided on site to wash down truck tires to prevent tracking of debris from the site to adjacent roadways. 5. Whether sufficient measures have been taken " to provide aesthetic amenities (e.g% landscaping, open spaces, recreational opportunities) on site adjacent to the Cinema? Landscaping/open space developments which are centrally sited on this property at the present time are planned for relocation toward the periphery (adjacent to the I-405 corridor) . Parking spaces are planned for the vacated area. Parking spaces and landscaped areas proposed by the applicant do meet minimum requirements established by regulation. However the submitted plan lacks a number of characteristics which would make the site attractive and convenient for Cinema patrons and for other users over the life of the structure. The applicant should meet with City staff including the landscape planner and representatives of the Parks and Recreation Department to consider revision of plans for open space areas, pedestrian access to and through the property, landscaping and for parking waiting areas (e.g. , siting, accessibility, amenities, noise mitigation) . Revised plans should address improved aesthetics and safety. To further ensure the availability of adequate parking for this project, the applicant should execute a joint use agreement with One Renton Place. 6. Given the high visibility of the site from adjacent buildings and I-405 whether sufficient measures have been taken to ensure the sightliness of the complex, particularly in terms of: * Roof top screening. * Architectural integration of signage * Night-time illumination and efforts to reduce visual glare. Building and Zoning De .tment Environmental Review C iittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 4 C RECOMMENDATIONS: The TAC recommends that the ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop more usable exterior open space that is not adversely impacted by vehicular noises, principally from I-405. NOTE TO APPLICANT: A more urban approach should be taken. A "porta Cochier" could be provided near the front of the theatre that would function both as a plaza and pedestrian/vehicular drop off pick-up zone. 2 . That all fill placed on the site be certified by a licensed geo-technical engineer as to its cleanliness and source of origin. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The geo-techs shall submit a brief report to the Department of Public Works prior to the placement of any such fill material on site. 3 . That the applicant submit an acceptable drainage plan to the Department of Public Works prior to public hearing for site plan approval. 4 . That the applicants develop a more urban vernacular for the proposed Cinema noting that it is sited in a highly visable area. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The Committee disagrees with the notion that this is a typical suburban type mall situation, noting adjacent buildings include two multiple story office buildings as well as a multiple story hotel. 5. That the applicant agree to participate in the South/Southwest Grady Way Traffic Benefit Assessment District; and 6. That the applicant submit a performance bond of at least $2 , 000. 00 to ensure that streets are kept clean of debris and dirt during construction activities. D.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Reviewer made the following comment: Building and Zoning De- -=-tment Environmental Review C tittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 5 Truck tire wash down for tracking avoidance during any open soil phase. Fire Prevention Bureau: Reviewer made the following comments: 1. Provide adequate water flow for Fire Department. 2 . Building to be sprinklered through- out.� 3 . Provide Fire Department access throughout construction. 4. Combustible structural members not to be used inside the building until water system approved by the City. 5. Building to meet all fire, life safety codes adopted by the City. Design Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Provide additional drainage capacity across back parking lot. 2 . Provide minimum 1500 gallon oil/water separator for storm drainage system. 3 . Provide sidewalk improvements on Grady Way frontage. Traffic Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Developer should agree to participate in South/Southwest Grady benefit district at $197. 00 per average increased daily trip generated. 2 . More information is needed from the traffic analysis as to what the average increased daily trip would be when generated. . Present analysis only gives average peak hour trip 4 : 00 to 5: 00 p.m. and 8 : 30 to 9:30 p.m. $197 X average new increased daily trips = $ benefit district assessment. Utility Engineering: Parks and Recreation: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. The proposed project as presented will have major negative recreation and aesthetic environmental impacts. A relatively large but poorly designed and, therefore, under- utilized centrally located open space is being eliminated and replaced by a much smaller non-centrally located open space closer to Renton' s major noise generator, I-405. Building and Zoning De--"tment Environmental Review C iittee Staff Report March 16, 1988 Page 6 The proposed open space area will primarily serve users of the Evergreen Building while the existing poorly designed open space has the potential to not only serve users of the Evergreen Building, but users of other Renton Village facilities as well. The area surrounding the existing • open space is under landscaped and will be even more so if it is converted to parking. Nothing has been proposed for the remaining triangular open space that is outside the project boundary. It is already next to useless, and if the proposed project is approved as presented, there will be no doubt about its lack of value. 2 . See attachment for additional comments. Building Division: Zoning Division: Computer failure Comments will be available. Policy Development: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. The checklist mentions a lot line adjustment as part of this request. However, a lot line adjustment is not shown on the site plan. 2 . Approval of this project should be contingent upon the execution of a joint use parking agreement between the Cinema and One Renton Place. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA March 16, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at at 10: 00 a.m. CONTINUED: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approvalto allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1, 405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36, 253 sq. ft. and 2 , 260 seats. Property located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF-090-87 ; SA-103-87) WILLETT Application for site plan approval to allow a seven-unit apartment building. Applicant previously proposed eight (8) units on site. Property located at 354 Taylor Ave. N.W. (ECF-077-087 ; SA-088-87) NEW PROJECTS: POLYGON CORPORATION SUNPOINTE PHASE III Application for Final Planned Unit Development (FPUD) approval for Phase III of Sunpointe Condominiums to allow the construction of sixty (60) multi-family units on approximately 11. 62 acres of property. Property located west of southwest 5th Court and south of southwest Sunset Boulevard. (ECF-098-87 ; FPUD-111-87) RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER Application to rezone eight (8) lots (115 'x 350 ' )/ . 92 acres located at the Northwest corner intersection of South 5th Street and Williams Avenue South from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to B-1 (Commercial) to enable future commercial development at this site. This proposal includes three undeveloped lots, one lot developed with a single-family home and four lots developed with medical services, under a conditional use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 Williams Avenue South. (ECF-001-088 ; R-001-88) CITY CENTER MOTEL Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a new 93 unit motel . The project will include the demolition of the existing motel units and swimming pool . Property located at 112 South 3rd street. (ECF-073-87 ; SA- 081-87) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS P1 CHANNEL - BOX CULVERT Applications or conditional use and substantial development permits to construct a box culvert which will be for rerouting Springbrook TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA March 9, 1988 Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at 10: 00 a.m. TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS CONTINUED: 10: 00 (15 mins) RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA Application for site plan approval John Morris to allow the expansion of an exist- Gary Norris ing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1, 405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36, 253 sq. ft. and 2 , 260 seats. Property located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF-090-87 ; SA-103-87) 10: 15 (25 mins) WILLETT Application for site plan approval John Morris to allow a seven-unit apartment building. Applicant previously proposed eight (8) units on site. Property located at 354 Taylor Ave. N.W. (ECF-077-087 ; SA-088-87) NEW PROJECTS: 10: 40 (25 min) POLYGON CORPORATION SUNPOINTE PHASE III John Morris Application for Final Planned Unit Jim Gray Development (FPUD) approval for Ray Caldwell Phase III of Sunpointe Condominiums to allow the construction of sixty (60) multi-family units on approximately 11. 62 acres of property. Property located west of southwest 5th Court and south of southwest Sunset Boulevard. (ECF- 098-87 ; FPUD-111-87) 11: 05 (25 mins) RENTON FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER Application to rezone eight (8) Nancy Laswell Morris lots (115 'x 350 ' )/. 92 acres located Chuck Price at the Northwest corner intersection of South 5th Street and Williams Avenue South from R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) to B- 1 (Commercial) to enable fu'-ure commercial development at this site. This proposal includes three undeveloped lots, one lot developed with a single-family home and four lots developed with medical services, under a conditional use permit. Property located at 411 to 425 Williams Avenue South. (ECF- 001-088 ; R-001-88) Technical Advisory Committee Agenda March 9, 1988 Page 2 11: 30 (20 min) CITY CENTER MOTEL Application for site plan approval Jim Gray to allow the construction of a new Gary Norris 93 unit motel. The project will Ray Caldwell include the demolition of the existing motel units and swimming pool. Property located at 112 South 3rd street. (ECF-073-87; SA- 081-87) 11:50 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS P1 CHANNEL - BOX CULVERT John Adamson Applications or conditional use and Chuck Price substantial development permits to construct a box culvert which will be for rerouting Springbrook Creek under 1-405. Property located West of the proposed Oakesdale Ave. S.W. extension and to the east of Springbrook Creek. (ECF-008-88 ; CU-008 -88; SM-008-88) The CaUiison Partn lip o •!:[t:rWTC!l n a�' , 1� 1 \i,1 r•` l 081988 ,�i,'G/ZONINLI utPT. To: AiAk7)V Date: g3- transmittal a /� //�� fi6: / V'r/ � Project No: 572.17 ❑Memorandum it l/` q 74 «4/V, %V Re:An/70A/ Y�L�L�Z ✓f//teisi X�PJ/VeriC We are sending you ttached Under separate cover the following: ❑Prints Originals Ci Submittal C Samples ❑ For your: G Information and use "Review and comment>As requested Action required: ❑As indicated C No action rer ed 0 For signature and return fririzwasr el7oarrfai 71-a) /Nf� ee2 CIVI • - .59-/03-67 ZWiN& CA7Vci5,4/t/S ram• 414 c=7-747/03 -(1-1 8� Mpotrey • �� -- fU�� err 7S a/rEf f7v " . ovr # `OG `- X/D44'i v& puN _' /9-�M yr /2,' --1V4 e5iEri Tzeril 2 /i2rM�' mil• /7 - aNcepr; ¢1N /c 1W (I) /O#7 neir#-ite l`#// -- L44---oa/3e (4) 6,0ie — l r t ✓T- 4)/Ifineic/f- --7v7a- finer) (¢)"rz✓✓ ' — nlcnt otfr v, 5m/M- By: ��/1/-�-- cc: ft -/ i bixedui If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once. Architecture 1423 Third Avenue (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation Programming Suite 300 Planning Seattle,Washington Interior Design 98101 • The Callison Part ship March 8, 1988 Architecture Programming Planning Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator Interior Design City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Site Plan Approval (File No. SA-103-87; ECF-090-87) Project Number 87247 Responses to the ERC requests for additional information prior to their recommendations on the site plan approval. Responses to the comments are provided here in the order originally given by the City: • 1. DRAINAGE: Since the City drainage project is not determined as to configuration or schedule, Renton Village Associates (RVA) assumes participation in the project will be deferred. RVA can provide only a conceptual drainage plan at this preliminary phase of the project. The City stated this would be adequate. (See attachment #17) . 2. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION: The only existing walks are around the Evergreen Building and existing cinema and also along the Renton Village Place S. Street which terminates behind Ernst. The proposal extends the walks around and between the cinema and Evergreen Building and will connect to the future public street extension of Renton Village Place S. to S. Grady Way. This will connect the cinema pedestrian patrons to the known bus stops on Grady and Talbot. Two additional attachments are being provided to clarify the future work needed on the lot to conform to the future street. (see attachments #7B and #10C). 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 The Callison Partnership Ltd.,A Corporation Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 March 4, 1988 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Site Plan Approval (File No. SA-103-87; ECF-090-87) Project Number 87247 page 2 No cross-site walks to the hotel now exist nor are any planned. RVA strongly recommends that if this type of improvement is considered by the City, the design and improvements should be addressed at the time of the development and construction of the shopping center lot and the public street extension. This would allow establishment of the exact configurations and circulation options on the site. RVA would prefer to not have a pedestrian connection with the hotel property. Pedestrian circulation connections between the other lots owned by RVA and the opportunity for the connections to the Renton Place office buildings are being considered and planned by RVA. 3. LAYOUT AND DESIGN OF PARKING: See attachment #7B for the configuration of the parking after the future street is constructed. 4. OPEN SPACE - EXISTING AND PROPOSED: Despite the significant increase in the floor area of the cinema, the additional landscaped areas being provided on the lot has kept the total impervious area increase to only 2%. The existing, designated, public, open-space area on the lot is 27,400 sf. The actual, usable portion within the existing area (paved areas with and without seating) is only approximately 4,350 sf. The remainder of the existing area consists of asphalt walks through bark dust areas planted with primarily evergreen shrubs and trees. The proposed designated, public, open-space area is 8,760 sf between the Evergreen Building and the Circa. Approximately 8,850 sf of the existing open area will remain. The proposed public areas will include a combination of existing and new deciduous shade trees and large lawn areas throughout the spaces with benches and tables provided in several areas. With the introduction of these amenities and materials in the new and existing areas, all of the proposed areas are considered usable. 5. NOISE MITIGATION REGARDING PUBLIC OPEN SPACES: A professional acoustic consultant did a sound reading at both the existing and proposed spaces and the results were included in the approval package. Noise levels (from I-405) were significant in both locations, naturally higher in the proposed location as it is closer to the freeway. While this noise is not desirable, no mitigating measures are planned primarily due to the physical properties required to control this "overhead" noise source. This noise is viewed as an existing, unfortunate and undesirable fact of this area of the city. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 March 4, 1988 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Site Plan Approval (File No. SA-103-87; ECF-090-87) Project Number 87247 page 3 6. AESTHETICS OF VISIBLE ROOF AREA; COMPATIBILITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE OF THE EXTERIOR BUILDING DESIGN: The nature and size of the cinema requires the cooling units be located directly over the areas requiring conditioning. This prevents a centralized location of roof top equipment and the potential use of a roof screen enclosure. The cut sheets of the cooling units provided in the approval package show clean, rectangular, self-contained units that will be painted to match the building. (The city noted that the visibility of the roof (from up on the hill) was probably not extremely negative, however features to minimize the industrial appearance would be beneficial such as gravel roof coverings, possibly in patterns). Gravel ballast roof systems or parapet extensions are being discussed with the General Cinema Architects. THE BUILDING DESIGN EXPRESSION: As opposed to an urban theatre, this building typifies the American vernacular of the suburban mall-type cinema. This vernacular is primarily a result of the economics and function of the industry and the building use. The material selection is of a material similar to typical mall structures - concrete, CMU, steel. (Some advantages this cinema does have over others is that an historical sense of the "Event" of attending a "Movie Theatre" is presented in the elevated, processional entry. This sense is also reinforced by the festive trim colors, the building highlighting, the billboard cases and the dominant marquee. Several of these features and colors extend into the lobby and concession area) . See attachments #18 and #12B (Photo of prototype cinema and rendered elevation to clarify the character of the proposed cinema) . 7. ALTERNATIVES - The city requested design background on the proposal - alternate approaches: General Cinema Corporation (GCC) is the current tenant (with an extended lease) and they do their own building design. The plan is a modified version of one of their stock plans (their typical procedure is to build from totally stock plans) . The design/development parameters for this cinema were to maintain a minimum square footage, 8-plex configuration, that would fit within the powerline easements directly to the northeast and south of the building. RVA suggested a multi (two) story building be considered due to these tight space restrictions. GCC responded that they had investigated this approach in several other locations and determined the additional construction and operating costs were too prohibitive. GCC will not consider any multilevel cinema plans. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 March 4, 1988 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Site Plan Approval (File No. SA-103-87; ECF-090-87) Project Number 87247 page 4 GENERAL: The city requested that since the cinema lot was so dependent on the future street configuration, the engineering department should review and approve the location and configuration of the proposed future street. RVA noted that in prior conversation with them regarding a street reservation for the submittal, it was the consideration of the engineering department that the future street design not be connected to the cinema development approval. The City agreed with this consideration and only requested that the alignment and curves be reviewed as they pertain to the cinema lot line. The future street configuration has been submitted to the Public Works Dept. for review and approval of the street right-of-way alignment and curve radius at those areas adjacent to the cinema lot. Their response is to be sent to the Zoning Dept. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: Attachment #7B - Future site plan with future street configuration (approx. ) Attachment #10C - Future landscape areas with future street configuration (approx. ) Attachment #12B - Color rendered elevation of proposed cinema. Attachment #17 - Conceptual drainage plan. Attachment #18 - Photograph of prototype GCC cinema. RVA/I.CP hope these responses provide the information and clarification requested by the ERC. If their are further questions please contact Brian Cloepfil, The Callison Partnership, ASAP. Your speed and assistance in the expedition of this site plan approval is sincerely appreciated. Brian C. Cloepfil The Callison Partnership bc/st126 cc: Renton Village Associates: Mike Sandorffy Renton Village Management Corp. : Loren Laskow The Callison Partnership: Rick King, file 10 ,,1 •may, '•` . I —J:LD;';G/.ZONIPJC7 DEPT. March 8, 1988 Mr. Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Village Cinema Expansion Project Number 87247 LOP LINE ADJUSTMENT (FILE N0. LLA-001-88) Letter of Agreement: As a condition for the City of Renton approval of the Lot Line AdjusV«iit being approved in conjunction with the Renton Village Cinema Expansion project, Renton Village Associates, owners, agree to establish the attached and below listed site features as their property site design standards and to apply said standards to all future development approval submittals on the remainder of the Renton Village property owned by Renton Village Associates: Attachment #1 - Landscaping types (see plant material options attached) Attachment #2 - Site Lighting types (parking and landscaped areas) Attachment #3 - Landscape benches and tables Attachment #4 - Landscape waste receptacles Attachment #5 - Landscape bicycle racks Attachment #6 - Site plan indicating approximate future landscaping configuration along the future public street extension. The attached cut sheets of the listed site features are included to establish the intended character, material, construction and approximate size of site features that are acceptable regardless of the manufacturer or vendor. Mr. Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Village Cinema Expansion Lot Line Adjustment Project Number 87247 February 23, 1988 page 2 Letter of Agreement: (continued) The obligations of this agreement shall be fulfilled and that portion of the agreement terminated upon issuance of Site Plan Approval by the City of Renton for each future project on the property. Renton Village Associates date City of Renton, Building and Zoning date bC/ST122 • ATTACHMENT # 1 • • • • RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION • . • PLANT LEGEND • ' . DECIDUOUS PARKING LOT SHADE TREE 1-1/2 - 1-3/4" caliper/20-25 ft. spacing • * 'Quercus rubra/Red Oak DECIDUOUS STREET TREE 2 - 2-1/2" caliper/30 ft . spacing • * Acer rubrum "Red Sunset"/Red Sunset Maple SMALL DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREE AT SITE AND BUILDING ENTRANCES 2-1/2 - 3" caliper/10-20 ft . spacing * Crataegus phaenopyrum/Washington Hawthorn * Cercidiphyllum ,iaponicum/Katsura Tree Prunus yedoensis/Yoshino Flowering Cherry Acer palmatum/Japanese Maple - COLUMNAR/UP-RIGHT DECIDUOUS TREE AT BUILDING 1-3/4 - 2" caliper/10-15 ft . spacing Populus tremuloides/Quaking Aspen Betula pendula/European White Birch Acer Circinatum/Vine Maple ( 12-14 ft. height clumps) EVERGREEN TREE PARKING LOT AND SITE SCREEN 6-7 ft. height/10-15 ft . spacing * Pinus thunbergiana/Japanese Black Pine * Pinus contorta/Shore Pine BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUB PARKING LOT SCREEN 24-30" height and spread/4-6 ft. spacing * Photinia fraseri/Fhotinia DECIDUOUS/EVERGREEN SHRUB MASS AT BUILDING size and spacing varies * Rhododendron species Mahonia species • * Evergreen azalea species Viburnum species * Deciduous azalea species Otto-luyken laurel Mugho pine Spirea species • - • • EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER AT STREET FRONTAGE AND BUILDING ENTRY 2-1/4" pots/18" triangular spacing or 1 gallon/3 ft. spacing * Hypericum calycinum/St . Johnswort (at street frontage) * Pachysandra terminalis/Japanese Spurge * Vinca minor/Dwarf Periwinkle Arctostaphylos uva-ursi/Kinnikinnick LOW SHRUB MASS WITHIN PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE ISLANDS 15"-18" height and spread/3-4 ft. triangular spacing • * Berberis mentorensis/Barberry • SODDED LAWN * • NOTE * indicates plant materials used to provide continuity throughout the Renton Village site. • • • • • • • = i - I HEIER I VAN DE VANTER GROUP PS Site Design Services ••...;.- • . • .-- -.... '''° -777i1; . - --- - • „...• •.V :;'•••!'k• .1)'"fit...; . 1 - ril‘• - .. • • • • .. -t...j...!,:.•• :,....z..4 . . ... •.. '1•••....:,'.•n....I tlip.'"A.L.'•4)if '... :....1'''!...'!1,••',.1 ..:ri. • ': •-•••'•.• •••1••••/-•-•• L.•;', c -.41':.;"'i:/ --:::••;•7511.14t.v.'.i.':;4.,*". '. .. . • u. •:,!:',? • , ...••,,,, 'I ..b.:iJ..„-':•,-77.;:ly_.,4, .:. --•: s !A 1..12:: .X. . ..., .. „. . • • • '• ' : ' ....' ;:*•-.•?•••;. t." -•'' f•'"4.3P....:`.;i- :•:-..1 4,..-V-4.11',%.%•;!•:1•I.i' 'f,f'!''.:1"..AiZrt•i ,1•••;',?.,C44,Al',....- ';).--•....°4-is q.•• ...,.. .: ... ..•,............. ...,i..,„,.....:...„,...„.,,,,:..,,„);:,,. ..._,.... ,,,.i.:._.„,,,.....„,,..„.,:.„,-,.: ,,,,„,..„....,,,...,..,.: . 1.j".".;•4...."7Y'4',t,,, •••• •1-91-iP. 9.-<-1..e?'4 k.4,, .*''''; . . .•-'•'•'•-•::•.......i.".••• •.'1,....;;•'. ..•'.-.•:. ..;•:...:...:.,1:412-=.•••:.'.'4."•s'Ak.•,,. 4 I''i. 14-44`4,1.•1"..4 ....Ali..1'., t(.4 4 . ..7 '''';c;;;-!••e•;.:1';:).:4.--,•:.1 1•;:tc'et.•,,,...e.1••,t;14-:',•,,&:-.4,„,....',...4:-•;.7;. • • • ......r.?•''Al'i7.:•• •!'•'•', 4"-::-):Lv'''A•.,74 C..,*:Ls:Z.:-!:..4.*''''' • • . :..*..,,i,.,.,...!.'....A........^:.• .7.i.•:,....11:7ae i.;•,:i'.":V1,4.TA.. 2i.i'r;`2 i4.,..:.11.4 • • .. ...........„..4,•:,.;.4 A..'?-4 71::.:...I1-' , •• • . •. • ...-, •.- •CN • . • • • .. • • • 't'!-'"!,':.•'...:;'•:;;•`;';-;.'7/4.*',.'.;',...'••••:7-,7--!-k\r4f:Wv`•-•?r•Irr' : 7-•v-•' -7•,;....••• •4!.:.r.*.•••:•-151..4--K•L''.7;,- ..• , .. .. .t.,:?..",,:l.1.-.3:.,/,Y.t.-.0.......z.,.......41.••••l.''' se. n n *s"•*•• •'• :7' I' 1..:.•:,.... :11'..... . 1-.va:-...:.'••::.,..i:: -Y.:'- . • .,:.- ••;.: ,'• ...-....• ..••.• . •• ,•••:.•t."•.1'eft 1•'!'',••':e...:-••••1:4•)!.4 't":. • :ill.t...4, “if WI e•-•st•-•4s.e)•?f?:r:$70%.1{`,1S; ''' .r.1,441.';'; 2, -- fiii';:!•!:f..•;:':4!.....'.1',:.,..i.1:‘1.‘,:‘': % • .':::• •• '' -••• • • . . • ' ' •• '•,•-•••Y,;:crli., •;•'•;/•.•:-',..71.k.r16..7-.,tr . •• . 1.,e.e...•#,. .,•1‘...74,.„„.iii,:?,,.: 1,414%7,, II. .#14.• .1... • fr.:;;`•i;::ty.j.;:',.i*P.A.;•%•••..*..;;;• •••:".."';;::,.f94 ,111:','it;;;E:*•,tv...!..;:lit,4,-fs-4 ,:4. -11- • .,t • . . ,...• , .. • -',.... .v...v•kz,...0 ,• • •. - 4.° I-P"'''', 4.'"Z rt: 1: ,' 40$ ,.., , r.,•:.;•t•• •,.. • . , .....,:i!:,..::, ...:,•;;;:iii_ci.:-:,,,..?:.....;14?,,,vii,-,7.;.,:ttiv i•.. +' ir . .t,dA v,,,i, ., IV • 6..11_..,.1.•4.:1•e 'e. f Inn". * :.•..:::.!••••••• ''..' . . • ' . *: „4...'.....;t1r4t'rrAtikgi:;.40?144%-4( ,...6.x.e401)..'. >.;.ft, •.-Akis . - .. .., .. • .•..•,‘....•....,...,,,,,I.,•it,-,,-,,.m,imiv,. wa,...•41:54,,,e•••;.;tr• 4- 's.'i.:,•11 •, .. t. v , . 41!''-.7'ri••:••f.' •I ' •'• In' •J•••••1•:ei'-:,.. ., 1-:•1 4.IS A.2... •• •• •• • -. .Z • •• • 7••!*;•••+•••••7''.:447(7.:11e.iif....,41_70.;:611:•.,7A•I"4.,"iiieOzt.411.,iii",,,...:I ''•• i'sr•4.1...4...k".. • .s'.•.•-••,......'i.51..i:i...1i1/;:::.:e..!; ::::7.*,'"•.!-.7P... 3,,Ati.• ••74”.0(V*?7%;•r4EAT1141•41,:..t1.414.7.0t, It .1'.,e."..,Nig;.14.,'i4;*- .. . .PriFF".tt. ii,,17friit',..•"...',.. 1' li•'s4. ‘' '• ' • ' •: . ,, ,t, . .. ,'..it.4.4,*,;IN,“••••Ii),4i,l'......%."1.e......./4Y4.(1:11.4/44Argto,N 0,i'4•>.1-14k,s1.... '.• • '.•••••• • : • ilig- , '.,..••\,,•..."...f..„--,, • ... .„ r• • LLJ .. . . . . . . . -. .: •-`,.s,:.,,..,F14.--4.1o1Y:!,y.;.9%.\:•:).41turtr''.'„ip,.',..,:kt; -.4vrt....1.40,...,14;:cp'T.,„ .. v. 1,,, .!...."...1.....,!-Si'.• 1 't517;,..7......1:1. .... •••!...n.li . 2 • • • •• • • • • ..., •.., :A i.,...4',,•:,,,•..1.•,;!:....::...a.•-•:ilt,..?•P).1 .....t..a„5::"1.:::::*:1•41.W42•fisrd3.11 .1....1 :;4 f...: ,..14:,'.q.:•:1:44;;i';...I.• • ill5f.TT''. • 1 i4.,... • .. • • •. . ,.:„.:.•,.fs:i7i74Y/•••••••/"1":k"'-'-i's1",-t• ak•-•-e•.,L" •••k-c•r.•-•;z:,r r...r4.., • $.,,,, •., • ,,:••••••••••„,....1-.V....,.:f4t.e.",;#1. 4 44Zikti:StP4iii.,,,:ir-gifi..•'''.• ..45'..i.'; . .....s •7.:,,wr...icr.ki,•,+.....•:`-•••;•,1,-•,..-,11.1.-o...e.k.c. f, ttp•,...r, • It .., ...0:1.../ ,.-k .• °S.!...l'er t•It't '•'•.,''.: . '..;al ilii. ` . -LI% 4 4•, I •.. .'Pr , '41.1,.14.#1 ,,..,44 W"..t.4).,.i;•4444.,A4tre"......if..f.,1,r*.ilo ...0!‘ 5, 4.}?1.?.:..T)•I. '.k.s!'•: .•/•trt, v:•;.;,C.;:.:-.;;,.. • i /AV: :••:;•..-.. ...:-••••• •- ' -••.T.'' ."4.... ....4'::.i'•".••••• -). 1 • •• '' .•...'.'-..,e..0..:.c.Al.,..qq.e•-•414.yo.ot•A ONYla,..•4,411A.,:tt'Atrt,t.i:Arrig:L24F;Irt:::,,'t .., • '..,;',10j1,:!•:•.Vf;jrzAW.:•;';!!•4.1.5,itii•iti..i•,•?;.X.Oit:g0.•!..i-W-ttiik••• ' 'INgoi-S;''Ci'ri•:;•;.•ti.•f!'" • . . •••"4•, J,•''teli.;....z...: *1)..*. •• 1:,•••......,--. .. i':,i1.;.,'• •t. '.1..:Q;•.`-ti`•:•• •• .,:.•.-:.14 ..•.r.,.,:::-.....-:...,,:::. , -up. C.) .. • . .• • •;...,..,.....,.,-;,',::•4,‘•!.......•... . r 1., 4 ,,,,,.t 1,1 . V • .• ..• ••••-• ...,,,,,,,,,,,..N.,742v,4s,,r,m+.,,I,Q-,...,,f,.41.4.,:=44.N,,,,,-,:fr.:1. -it., . .,:.,..., • . . . . ‘,.'''.1-.-'-''' '''':":'•.'''''''.4". • :.,.',.:.;.:•••-T.A5.'„•‘.r.a.::•,'21.-11::••11•:•:,i,-,i;:,Ist..• ,j,!•12 ••,...p,r,.4 .Y.4:te.,:•-:‘,., ..„• : r:iy.. lee.A.,•,,,...t.:••;:•E.,' ' •-.7ite '(• '••'•-•" ••' ' .. .. :....v.p.f.ev;,-,,V:w,74-4•ki.r.,:i,.,,,,:N1,11:..v_„.v.....P.I .el,e.-.,...;.ikribV••4•7.1.!•.,:::-,';':'•r:.: •..;;',?.....it-il; ..•:' • • •• ,.0:2-T,,),•"......-5.kr,. :.-..-.1*ProwerR..orPr^7.T.: ..•.,. .,,..•,;,,;.,.„5:.........y,.:.y...r,.. .---.......3.,,,,•;•,..3..c....,1;,::.:04.,4ii.1.3.•;:.s-f''.%iY-.:1P.,,4.;7%-i,".!7..i'',',•". 4-1.4't,y, •,,, -.• • ...e:* • .••'7i15,44?4;71", ••ivr;V:k15.r.t44:i•s-r.--,:••-•!,:p..t:ztiAlt,:lii.,,,,,,,.....,..rii.:,1..:-,i.,„-••,-..,. ...4,...xt. . ..,........ __„. .1;,--....‘,,,,,...:-.:.•,..-„,,, •:-.,.,,,:::,,,,2,;,..q:;•;:„....,-.:.:,,,.?,,,,,,is.a.,-y.! I._. . - -. •'.' •'711f,.,,f`t7.."11alleKX,1•,.e.4t.'...-Alt..'4..t.;11441::2J ili.,A11,14:',.z.::,7•4.7.7s•;;;r.p,C;:.....--.F:.e.,77 .....i tit'.2k!St,FAIZ‘2,1, :.i• ..i. i...:r•-:: ;.,7, _If r":,._:..- .:•.:',.. :'4:-.:.,,;.i.........',.-. ••:::i.l'i,..,:•••.-:.',..::f.,:.).:'•:;r-;.,Q4r.i.rf,:tA-:4-4.--tcf.•;-.1'...-Z •• ,....IN ' ,...i,:-'..V4..i'F.i.;t4!:Z.c4Fifj •tilZ: • ,4c ,- .•, :7.7!?.'4.•:•. .:•.,,,•7:•e:.•..:.,,::is;;•!;1;.....1.wAl• 4.. 7,7,2.,:. ;;•fC.:- .z.t. `,..4.... 7'#47.!,7...,..7/:f.,.1'••1••••:::;.,..;.,.%. ',..;) - ).y.•!'..;: ti=1.t.715?;;;- 1-- . . • ' ,! 'k, .•?„ti'L-'4;•;*.i1:1,t7f:. :1,.. 7 •..-......!..f.,1,••1;11,-.-'5f4r1...i:-i-.: :',.,:i;:::'..!,'.:'1,F,..r..**'..'.......**. ''.. -•ti:,.T.,1: 33:Z1-4.'• ,..1:q.'.1:1';;;A• 1,1* f4.-g:r- •.(,1 %.,7.4".-.",zr:,:•,..:.!:.-v..,f:..Ife.,,.::.::-3,-.7;-..s.;:....i..2•;,. !,,,I....,..F.,,,I...,, .,,........,.,..,...,r..t..74..1;1,7;,.1.•::-...e....-..0,7•••••4•••••••:',.•••••••-.',..i...-..- '.:,•'• . •Li-..., •4".`,:-..4.-7,4 7. •1:7?.k7-7.-4.•K'f. •i;:•;7:-..•1q.• ,•C'il'i7.•••:.,,,,....-.•,11,..;•••:;•;-..,,I,4. <.: ..... . ' r J'7.-••••..k....•-t .':7•••••4,;;77'./1.:,.r7,-;?.;54..:-.:•1+-r•*,',.'.. ...i1.7,^.......4•';‘•••,:r,•.;-....•:•••'...•• 7• :...:;-•••••.:.-e4.4.4-•31.$ I •,-,:f,,•-,-'t::••• ,,. .1,21.-Alfg!,:?7••••••••i......,-;,:::„,, ,,.....1 •. •••<z;.:••:7-,:ir..„.,.;?...„.41;4,4•.;z,....,••••••.;.....:,;,:,...,4•••••••!••••:;.....'s'f.'•••••:',...... ..t• ';•1'•'•• ,' : v:•••,..e .%•`:iififs, ; :,... -4,..q.'ffA4.J : g ' •••'•:•-•.:,,,-,..1 • • • •i!..'•-•.1,4;f•- . r.,:'"t>,•'m:.`.. • • . . . .,;...;•:114:.ii,•.?.::::7.:;" ';:• ,•,.'.. .''.'.;,.. L".•,1:4 ::.':':;::•:::' • • . :. • "! •;•,•:',:'.:•:i.. •, :le p,c:..,,g4 t ...,,...t.,,, • • . .. . 1 • • r...,. ‘...:.j.•,..::;.4 ::` •:: i::,.......: :ii•••••••..,ji:;i...s../ ...• . ...: •• ' i: i'F'''.. ": ...i..• . . . . . . . . . • . ... .• . . . .41:a".:.\CO:.14 Cf.f....t.1'......."..•::•.:•. .::. •.:.• : .... .•.• • • • • • --' . . AN. .' ' "kt.-. .;• . . •. . it.... a.' : •• . •, . . •i wir-i I..• i _,........ •• • i• - .1. . • . i II ' .:•-....--------- , ' _ : . • -:. Oragji.4 . - - .. ' ''. '::.:!..,•, .• ..4.1'..:,:'.":s •• :. . • • .. • • ,, 11 • ,'...4. ',:fc•...A.,;•-,.4 ,,,...,,,,,,,. ,:,•,..i.%-ii,:kf,.4 1 .., ?. P.,lbc I • . ..7::;,...,..:..,...:i,,,.;.:.,11......:..:.i ....4/r 7:•,.;1.?...,.f...*:4•4;00,:-AICI.:3•i•.,•••••7:.4••:•..,.......'; •4.:7•7 - ; ....i.......,..,,....;•,•;::14$1•II.)1'd:It,•.'11,J,F•••c;;:e.:.••14%:'•1',i?‘",i 4‘..1'••••••',•-••:',:;','.•i:;') '.Z,f•c.: ';',•,-.i•,i',,i.A ..:`..:.-.7'...i,,•-“,i ...,4•A7.7.4.,‘Z.: • %LI •1•71%,"•• 1 . . .- . / •::...l'if...7;:giti,,i:'''."...•.I.A7;kii...A1?!1?4g4..A'i:i.',441q1.4M411..r14.?''''.'Vi. ...:.';!.:...!".:!:!•••';. )••• 7t.L.1,74'. t .:11•••!...1"..7/.; . • .. - i •..70•'.'•••:A..••:.•.":••••1,.,......X...':,,.........4.1:4-...:.!:.;,:l t.;•yi-t.:1;..):.V.;;;.i:,4,",,,,.1.n...;:.`'.,:i..........•,••••••'.....'..:q;•:.! .::,c'......'t.r.,4:.! 4-70'.;:ldr1 •.: •AV:S.V.C1.1,; 4 1 t e.....--....,,- - • -.pi.> -.,..t.;_ ,.... ft ...-r - *.i'..,4;•.:.'f„,....;•:'.:-..;••-•*.:•,.:7.:.1 s',.;•:.••••'•.. •:•••,,•7.••!..7':'•..i:. K.,•••1:17:1-10',.;.:.2. 4..•• •.*;:;•!.••;•.-;:1-A . ';•••:-."l'"•Px.• -•`.ii-'17.z. -: 441.$5,-.1t1.v.IF. i . , .. • , .,k ..; .• . . ..--..j.-...-.-.?•52.--.,--...7.:•.•'.:4T. •7•:!-e.?•::-& •-•:;:,•• .i-..`'•....• . '-'-'•.r:;:;••••• •:• •.!,.:...,'.../.3,:t.,1; ‘:7•• 4E.I ..1`,1.4;';‘•:i'llA; ••• •-..i iv.S:''''''.1:..7 •' -.. ..- •••. ••••••41::',,•:N •?••••• '.' . • •'• ••• • • • • • •• .• .•••• -:'•'..)...7,4•!. ..,:" ..4.-.;%.,••:!.3 • '4(1,,-.11fY'-.S`41 1 '‘ .. • :,,!';-:•••r ..4:. ••.• .?•w,,.....-„sirt,tt.',,-tv,t.:;5•.•:ilz 77 r" Nqr•••1-' :•:.!r e.,•..... . . • " . -. ; 'It'Lli:,A7t.f.g514tI?:;.?'.....71 :t..:47'.1.• ,Y...K.t.'i. • • k•k.- • • Iskt,..ii;.,,p4 .4)a..t,,i,....,;! ... . . ., • • . . . • . . . • •• . •.• . • •. • . . . . ..• • I I . . • .. ... .... .. . .. . 4...... .... . .. .7' . . ... . .;.. .. .. . • • - • • ' .' .....1' ''.:.••:...-•'.::` .7`s; . . - •-•:•.-: ••.• .,•• •/r.:. :'I : . , .c•-•• ,' -' • I•.• .. -.1 ti,Lj • •-•: ••••.':..'••• -I <'••••••• • • ' '• ••••',' li".• :.•• •••••• 7-• !•:. 1...:7:4,..2,-....`:;..7'.44. I •;'•:f;:.7,1-*1•,.•;•....,..:••';•;,'..7:7•-.:,.:"' 1,.":•• ':7•;57:..;-7,••••••:•••-- (4.•;'..-',•.•;,.••,-..... ; .•••. :•• :.-•- -...:• ...•.: • c •• ..•• •.- ,.. ,.... .. . .,_•'•• •••••:•,.....••-:.; :tf 4f,t; • • - • r"71 .• .- „,C.:.•••.•••,.....:•.., -,-r .it.ko... . .0.....,-.,:k..4.,:•{44 4-...i,u.44‘..k.i...i ;,.4. Ac.k:;:; ,......,_,.,4....;.;k11..4:''. ..L.:.h.•;..............::::;.:4' .kaa.p.eihilmt • • -/ 4'd . • , -•• • J . . . . . • i .. ,• • • .• • me - • . . ..ir ' . • ' • • 7'•••. . .0 lei I • •V. A. . . • . • . • ° • Explanation of rhotometrics • and Pole Spacing Charts tv) All photometric testing conducted with standard clear All Photometric Testing by acrylic.Footcandle and C.U.correction factors for • Independent Testing Laboratories,Boulder,Colorado optional enclosures listed below. BR Bronze tinted acrylic enclosure 0.54 LS Clear Lexan enclosure 0.92 • Whenever single or twin fixtures • Whenever single or twin fixtures _ produce a light pattern that is produce a light pattern that is _ symmetrical in quadrants,only symmetrical in two halves,only (/ one quadrant is shown,per- one half is reported.permitting �� miffing maximum size and -�, maximum size and accuracy for accuracy for the charts.These f the charts.These fixtures - —7—I—P.—. fixtures include: include: ®, / JJ • Single(Square Distribution). •Single(Asymmetric Distribution) \________, I Twin(Asymmetric Distribution) For Twin(Asymmetric i Opposite aiming. Distribution)with parallel For Twin(Square Distribution) � , aiming,multiply footcandles 4.multiply footcandles by two. by two.Ref.page 5. Ref.page 5. Pole Spacing Charts for Fixtures with Type V . Square Light Distribution . For parking lots or general area lighting,it is necessary to determine C both longitudinal and lateral pole spacing.These charts show pole spacings,average maintained levels of illumination and mounting heights within recommended uniformity of 4:1 average to minimum. 150' • The following procedure is suggested: . 1.5 1.Determine level of illumination your area requires in average maintained horizontal footcandles.The I.E.S.handbook may offer . some guidelines.If the footcandle levels are too high on a given \o, - chart,select a lower wattage lamp that will produce desired illumination level. • 100' 2.To determine pole spacings,trace down the desired footcandle fi curve to any point between the two marks denoting mounting . 1 height A _ .` j _ ,k 3.A whole series of longitudinal and lateral pole spacings are 4 available.In the chart at right,combination B 77'x 80', o, — .......... C — t...D. 16 combination C 93'x 65',or anywhere in between will produce c 1.5 Footcandles average maintained at 16'mounting height o 50' ' 20 and 4:1 uniformity. u) 1 r Remember,light levels are average maintained,not initial. ati cs o_ I 50' I 1100' 150' Longitudinal Pole Spacing Pole Spacing Charts for �/ Pole Spacing mart Fixtures with Type Ill Width a StrM/ Single fixture. Asymmetric Light Distribution j�. E,,.., meets These charts are direct reading, / /�/ �� Avow.to >,: giving suggested pole spacings ■ ■ Meet,3:1 u,; ,, for various mounting heights, —O -S e Spacing tot-'soti fe �"°' m """"" street or area widths,and l Mounting Height 10' 12 14' 16' average levels of illumination. width of Street 10' 15' 18' 20' 25' 10' 15' 18' 20' 25' 15' 18% 20' 25' 30' 18' 20' 25 30' 35' It is assumed that fixtures will Average 0.5 be installed on one side of the Maintained 1.0 `69 :82: '.78' 68. 82 i 76 73 65 '58t 71 68 62 5 • area only. Hoorizonales 1.5 '64' 58 '54' '46 681 59 55 52 •45:' 55 51 49 43 'd8� 48- 46 41 37 f F2.0 57 48 44 41 f35i 51 45 41 39 •341' 41 38 36 32 `29A 36 34 31 28 O Pole Spacing(feet) Pole Spacing(feet) Pole Spacing(feet) PoleSpaang(feet) A6-19 Warning:This fixture must be 8" Round Drawings grounded in accordance with Specifications local codes or the National Electric Code. Failure to do See page 12 for so may result in serious photometrics • personal injury. (..) I I • F. .,, • J T1 7 C - I iiiii B& RS, C'N 4t r s 3 >i ' 1 • r ' Light Center `�R �' ` Height :','.•:..,..t,'';',"--.7; ....:.;'''''';:-.7`,titl'2.-:-:•..1-:; ;,......,,_• 2 ri il— '7C•`ry'4`_',:y^.�-- • :'.�-:•'�� y �) ;" '71:' .�y ._. .. .i•f �:c�:l�<cif, • I• e�-si} „ ",?,c t4 1',l : :. ...,,,..,.,. � . . � 7' ;; • .J- Anchor Bon :;.iw. .,0*• ) ,--::; ' •,, •,• _ . *�.t Concrete Footing By Others i '- '.-.-:... ''.-sr •77'' r 8"Ola.—I • ` .. ~ - Conduit Opening 5.. a+ ,, ,•- Bolt Circle A. r' —.-: . Dirt � � � 1...; ,..i. ..s.°14 ,1 .:-''' ,,t'i-:7'.'-',';?,-44..,,.,,,,,,-,'. ".'•*:-.D.,:;"1.43;`,\'''..1;m:—.-- -'' S . ti Specifications Post Construction—One-piece extruded aluminum,.125" • Gasketing—Fixture is fully gasketed for weathertight wall thickness,with heavy cast aluminum twist-lock anchor operation. base concealed within the post. Wiring—Supplied with high temperature socket leads for field Plastic Enclosure—One-piece injection molded,optically connection to the prewired ballast components. clear,100%virgin acrylic,1/4"nominal wall,retained in an Ballast—High power factor for —20°F.starting,factory unstressed position by internal support through the reflector mounted to the anchor base,and prewired. assembly. To Cap—One-piece Anchor Bolts—Supplied with four 3/e"x 10" + 2"zinc electro- pheavy gauge spun aluminum,retained plated L hook anchor bolts,each with 2 nuts and washers,and by 2 counter sunk captive socket head fasteners,and braced a rigid pressed board template. at the outer edges by the optical assembly.3/4"thick insulation provided above lamp. Finish—Standard finish is TGIC Polyester Powder-Coat Optical Assembly—Precision hydroformed optical louvers Paint.Optional anodized finishes are available in accordance with specular Alzak€finish,mounted and removable as a one a) with Architectural Class I specifications,and are applied over piece self-contained unit. satin polish k:. Socket—Porcelain with nickel plated lamp grip screw shell, Certification—All H.I.D.fixtures are Underwriters rated 600 volts.A special 5KV pulse rated socket will be Laboratories Inc fisted.Photometric data provided by an provided for all High Pressure Sodium lamps. established and certified independent laboratory. B30-4 Kim Lighting • • • Caution: Some interpretations 8" Round Catalog Numbers of the National Electric Code Finishes may allow 120 volt fixtures only. If 208,240,or 277 volt continued Options Ordering Guide fixtures are desired,check with local code authority before specifying. Fixture Catalog Numbers . 'Fixture Line Ballast Line Operating Starting Lamp(by others) Cat.No. Volts Type Watts Amps Amps lip150W.Incandescent B30-100 120 NA NA NA NA A-21 I.F.2850 lumens I75W.Mercury Vapor, B30-200 120 93 0.82 • 0.80 coated,E-17 or B-17 B30-201 208 CWA 93 • 0.48 0.46 3150 lumens B30-202 240 93 0.41 0.40 B30-203 277 93 0.36 0.35 ip100W.Mercury Vapor, B30-205 120 118 1.05 1.00 coated,E-231/2 B30-206 208 CWA 118 0.60 0.58 4600 lumens B30-207 240 118 0.52 0.50 B30-208 277 118 0.45 0.43 70W.High Pressure B30-400 120 88 0.81 0.75 Sodium,coated, B30-401 208 88 0.47 • 0.45 E-23'/a.5985lumens 630-402 240 HX-HPF 88 0.40 0.37 B30-403 277 88 0.35 0.35 'Catalog number includes CWA = Constant wattage autotransformer,high complete fixture,ballast, power factor(90%or better) -20°F. anchor bolts and template, starting. and standard finish. HX-HPF= High reactance,high power factor (90%or better) -20°F.starting. c: • Standard TGIC Polyester Powder-Coat Optional Anodized Finishes Paint Finishes Included in fixture price. Extra Cost,consult local representative. Cat.No. Description Cat.No. Description _ BL-A Black g`B-EE DaRlarkrk Bronze,resembles 313 Duranodic DB-A Dark Bronze in col NA-E Natural Aluminum Optional Houseside Shield 160. A,t�7, _,ti Fr ,�, Melding r } { i D r b zy } Extra Cost,consult local representative. For elimination of back tight In unwanted areas such �- y as adjacent property,or wherever an asymmetric light YW�s y L ir4 T ._distribution is desired.Constructed of sheet aluminum :A - covering a 160°arc,and finished to match the fixture. •:? ,'T `y� See page 16 for photometrics. 1-t� x Catalog designation HS a ' Optional Plastic Enclosures Ordering Guide Extra Cost,consult local representative. Cat.No. Description e• e�`'`� Ge4No• dA BR Bronze acrylic equal to Rohm and Haas 2404. oi•`''`e e‘p' 6'3°4 LC Clear Lexan CAUTION-Use only whenorhL pQ vandalism is anticipated to be high.Useful life is limited due to yellowing caused by B30-400/BL-A/HS UV from sunlight and H.I.D.lamps. "Alzak"and"Duranodic"are trademarks of Alcoa."Lexan"is a trademark of G.E. • Kim Lizihting B30-5 • . . 1señes7. . IT TA C H M E N T # 3 . . I ihisfler villas = NimmiN bench series 7 ;tit. ., , : _.. -.. , ,y 1 any ' �r O 'x„-f ` J J"Ar`` •� DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS ;� &- .''',,•' WOOD: Clear vertical grain red cedar. • _ . ' - Members are 31h"x31h" (4x4) with 1/a" wt� ;S L radius edges and ends. ti {�` - STANDARD FINISH:CCA pressure treated, w' • r_ cedar. i '•;•7 .'} . I. i- � I METAL: Mild steel 3/a"x4" precisely fabri- • '''� .`_; ": cated to final form. '`•.i a. �`14 F=-:"��- �.;( ;-••;--. STANDARD FINISH: Heavily coated with '• ''I, • • "'-� �1' • powdered polyurethane electrostatically • : .�. �- -- -. applied and baked at high temperature i _ ---` to a"mar resistant"finish. k. i ,• �- -_ -�= COLOR CHOICE:Black,Northwest Brown, ,: .. —:-- MIdnite Blue: - Y _^-:------- HARDWARE: Large diameter fiat flush °•.•t� " " �� head bolts with electroplated brass finish may- t 'e} ,-.. for all wood attachments. .r- Special vandal-resistant "MAGIC NUT"r"1 used on all fasteners. SIZE: Standard length is 5'10" seating height 17:'Other sizes upon request. BASE DESIGNS: Free standing, inground, .1 • ': surface bolt down. • •'441 OPTIONS: Call collect to our main office 424 for information on custom woods,finishes. i� sizes,and other design modifications. 7.5 7.51 7.52 �, rd. 7' r .■■■■ T • • • W ' TiK- _LT T jFf—r-r—H 1-716- -7i4�-1 r+-a' --1 iv- iw- 3+r.- 31c- ■ 7.6 • 7.131 7s2 y �•-:: • • • • 4 % _ .4. f,..::::. ir 1-t-r-5--r I-io-f--i1--H 1-e--1-s--i-r-I M1 F R A N CE S/A N D R E W INC. (206)565.5397 • • '' :i ' �• pi.,.,... 1t .,,. • ,�1 1� y,,,7`'.4,!).`,7�.1rv,i:l.t!</ kri y _ v /};.,P • P.,,.. t �t #' It .' -�. \ ..,; ", � 'v':. p' ..hi P(, 7.z& O' 1f , ,4 ,.T;, 1/4$�y ':M!T (.11.X?'C.:.,ri,i 1 'C:• fS .. _t'•,!f`N V .'-' r M.•,. r'::' 4':VYf.� tar ,y. I 1 •�,,i0 ,• •i'!. '.C` -r.r7y"�?'. +t} } .:,,...A ' } P•„ Ti. 7 •.. • Q ''L • .Gs .,,,!` '•U X,Y tp�;:i' .. .,}' /it..:e. ,'.�`!'Nl:.?.i.'i,7�-.`'} . .1•• , :,, ','n-!''v .' •., , ,K ,•I I- -AC •h•; 'i a ,, j i f,;Yr7 t '4 ,z1' • t�q :'y2rx m ' Py'y:5 ' `pk. . �) r • • . _ . 1 ti'{,,:. .r, .--•.� 1$,�,,' % a r., &%. �,c•c'roo N ?r tpiY me• i r " • .i �„;il E �. '- r.w, 1•C tt g�:::,: ,,t�, ' z4 1 + I •A 'r< 3 .,-im • '..ti. rrt''' a • i ',.r,�p V o i e ,,f,.�,'f.,,T.. ..,�51 '1. CE II , ."0, '.'.g i� 1i' a '''*,. `11�� in i. ,fi;t� 4'S''` Klan..m,m�0 4 � IY:, .!1 ; 1 k r� .'�1i ,i •'i ''.: 9 ' '. • .�.a.•c r toi-10V•- ri•il ai • g' :{eft•?'. ,�y ' ;S '2W,•' 'b :.¢ ;•� r�'c0.$'N � i�,°drr",.. 1+r=` t�, t,JFi°{�rtt7' ,+` xLL s.i,-r t Q7 C:n •m mIII41i1 ; SC,ESOc,�Sa 41 .II E7m• lit�crg'.via - .S,. O ,.F Ic•m'3-O7`�OKn`• ,'i3.' � , .kairiyK ti 2 �rrr • _ .m:N ,N:O•�.1} '}' 't- .l 'k:� k v tt� F P N' .,.}yN, =,c m�,m•..,C..0,'. a �^l ' i ."r. L ' }� 'Y �F g r't 1 :>y�-ia,i7 1 :i:',?F�•�.oC(O.O1W."r,'`i"1•, 4.','�,i ,J� • :'1: ':� 3 l!'��.i ,r y. ,-� ?k .r? sv< '�, ,'7�', :� �'`�' tt.;,�� vl,��, r°,.Et ti1�,f ' ti • '�i,1 • .',,. ,✓3rjtt'�liS 'Is1 )• `.'.°1Vt:y ;•',a ..11'�•a,"j •• *�nS'<?�S ^ }+r, R`,• • R '1 rtlµ • :4 1 '4Y '' y • 1 r ,.t R, r'^t, ••,•�;:. Y r ffrty;j; '? t'�' ,1 1 �. iM1,' ••�. I 11 { i,, :�'"y;'K °[ , `'' ,.tt^r '' • •;t ti• t;•�'. rho + u' fi ,. !'�'�•- u•'' '' 1 i• ., f r7, 14•,, ,..' + r •: '{+,�, '47!',P �F.91 Tr !• i -. .—. — r "' 1 S, 1' - j f r,: I 6�d,h`r3F } 'w�.�kks':•!a";ce '` �yC/. `�,\ • '',r ••= 4 S .f • •'' ,y :,lf:;.S pY` ';i ' .75 :`'_ ®�lli .` p. A `9• •�'trNOfn i` j}� ▪ `.0 ,,tr' •}�'9. } ! �' 1 ri. n` .R • k.;� ut jyi .i ,4. , !It ;'yl •-•i,.,,,• 1 :` •'`. t Maw [ ! t•5r ��,Ti' �`• !'•' ;..41;,+�l 1 �� , .�,: }i l.li ,,,, '? .I,: , tl,..t • , 1:k, r ',' i '{!,, ° 1, f c.i�e�•I • ''.,,,'I'1..' P � 11t' Y .1;`s ) :y) I i ,1 I ,� ,.1d f 'R', t / :t1;4•J„lit tt.., r ,p ,t• `� 'r9 ,�+. p, V. ,J I'• '):`1, I �' ) .� •+, _rk'S i .ri , •.; j�li4 • „ t' ` �iji�y i i',1' 'ifter ,v" r?.r' t i r V, S1y}�+ ',i. �_• 5,� "lf .•:,�A ` 1• n'� I i t'x 'i'` (\ Y., . I `fin ' f 'A'OJT •' k ;,,kr' , b • �t,. [ .r �� I /t L "Ir / t.l7> N :�i r h1'f(!,k Y �.1 r. 't".,..riF IY � �'�M �i ity�' L 1'' k I'� t •" ` ,ry`$' f '�w '7,[t ,� . ,. r tv.:� • '.J.'^ji.y. Oil ': . * Yir• ITiq' '''''i* . ...',• '' ' Y ��' pr: ��,,i� c 3 �j ,. � I.E. S'r : •IdI1t11li1IL ! ,i A• •. u'y, iS` s t i � � ' c * j )A:-„ , . ,. ' .. ''l;,tS v +��i* y.; 'tit. , ,4'C;,��r �'jY:'�,''k 1' '` �"� I` 't. 't•'t• t t{r �I)e , -„ } :�i�''�••1 • T', i. .Y` -1 d v" it1�i t •.: •,� .' { t• �,(•+,,it :4' •• .fit f"� l" .. .•� +d,k= ., • Ill l•`.�..:.�%s r•,... 4.1....{, 0iN/ if t �`. '�t S • J \• a `gyi�'� �Qe1+G 1 � ) V+� ,S.Y, -,, 7F4'-ri;}1b i e •t Ld! )J[:� 0•q Y'rt,! ','.•7 •. I.• t� •-,�` i*: er: ., • ',`',` • te,`�."�'. 3 r• '-1a �' f ti�B r \+rr`��L .:{{',l Ylri �,.f+:' .jli 't ? tlm . t� yp� ta.r, t r'q,i,'�scgf;A:t i. a • • 1, ' . r •�;4. F-�,+ft L, �y t t :.xC'•* y t', _v., i rr�Cci :1 0 '41 1 \\ ,. Z �. �NNI IF( 4 r b� • • t }�/{y 4� 9 iii. ' iK ( VS 1CLUM•rrr� idl' , NI' • g- r 1Cr •75i"t ,: ��yr , itil,_ttilia,tIc i.,*-:,.,.,,K.'f...., .,,. ,:f . ..• .. • jM1`r�. le. • t • ..__. _� ;,.• .a. y.,Z7. ;�j S 1q 4! }, i � it C t :•••4 fY.: ?y. i m, 1 i• , ft •� ' Y (.. i.•(t :1}1 •'El ..'11; .. ' • I • =,v,.-•:1:45,:1,..; "4 tit ti ;� ,,, , t. ,,glit� tl r• t ir; a ;. :+ ^;STi,}�. a} h •e (? •{ tii ' t s �j,' 8 '�;',r N y'-l.'r c.�. _ :,,�.:7 flt*.* .••. ,,'':'-'L. •- .. . 0„,I. 41 1, vi „,„ , a.1.1 Air,.• tf 1 •;;•,....• v. •..f.-1 0,.. A g . . 2 . O.', A...it:.'.9 ..1'. '.. “.:•••••e!..-i'lt.'' 4,A ISO:. , .. •t ''.i, ' ' .1 . ly., i .,„„..,,, , e: ., ,, ..,„,,,,,,,,,., , . 1 • 1, ., , 1. •1 ...L.t. "T..r.t :.4 tom- .,� 41 ,' •.t�:1.. -:l: IT 4.t1 f.' .-' . 7 1'r�j ''1. ;../ I,At,f`, •,;,t^-„1 ''' N 1 ! AS 1. ` •"C`'..:•" V,. Aia—..'''....,`. , 'fin .0•iti''.r. n ,•,•,,•,.+r a1 �.,,,,}•4. it. . r '„1 ,��ccr •t.,- :N. e t: `: k i.,r i er \. (N .� °4 p�. a ,,i ,- t 'g. f .�' ,, .y' ;ii' .,,r J••••1 f !it' .4 c `� la ` l 1 o;t'. (• T, :r� ?r?.. .•i, . .'" ' v n. ,7, ,?, ,- . , ,.. .-T3'` rt ".,..4,: 't�to- yy' y '•.i ,•. •� ,.R P �°! •`'+'u ;t4•,. ••• t 'r S I`"1.. 'H,t.� :i�.. S+ ��1 Di y� � �`;T �, r.;,•.:,+�' }. .kty,f v:! �r t ��5�41:/tY ,r'. ( ,� r. qq,.1; ,� +rik. � {.r6M (•5' „(t � +'' �vc•..Y �'�, �• ;i. 1', .'S �'d',:1ry,H'.;t:,[,_ ...r�:. sl P. . 1 ... v�;•,}s.to-it ,. �.y1•„U.fs �?��;�t.J.., :�i$ . .��,tP:.. `n.':r.... v,.1.•. ... .., -. ,, ! .':�. rm4R. I4/•r%a.ft it*.''.i%I''' 4•* ''t•.4,i4.tk,. /c.*1i i1. 0g,.-/.4••'...'..‘Iii,r•19 ••'4.••''M•1'•cilse• m• 1:%'!•2a. ',/•-i•l.i"$r:t',•t,,e•r..1•e•%*;:,/:.'(..u4•.,.4:.,,,-t*•4;••);•.14• -t„,L .vAV.i...••,.••:.,,!,.",.4,t. ;ct r._.,1,„a•,,..1:0..-0. 1.,....:,%:..(.,:...•,.•••,''••.,.:-1 f.:lSt,f..,(,,,'ai11c.ie,,e.,;.:.. 4*.. • , /_. 4 ,......1r'4l.4• 1,.1,3 ti 4\'.••F l•igt4'' s'•. • •• 0 g 1..04) " V r ) x I i " - .1::.:,:.r.itl,.,'..•4'•.'.is,1..1'i''t.'. ,-'• ' - 171z. • , z C . . • , - • „..,... 1. ,,„... ... ...!1 . .. • • •-.as.s i- . • 4 4Alk •,,,,,•:.•,4 , •••.' A g ,.„.:•,•:,..,:,-,-,. :1. , .. ,-;,, ,...ev. ..1,: ',oZ..' "4, .. ‘' 41‘..V; .lit - e"‘‘‘..0:'44 1. " :•'''I'•1 ' fl V: 'f". ' •11;` °'• ' ' '• '.',' cfer..1.4 •' ' ..J , ' ' *."* If V4 ' A ',' ', ..)k:'4 il••(.*,'•ff/41•':1••,1,./, •';';ii.' '4.4ZIP -"%k ',' lg :•'''','',. . ..j ••1••••'st ;••-,!,• '.• „.. •- • • -.. • /•-• ii14:iii.t \ "tt4 .- •' • 1- . . 0...,2' fe.:4. .,..., :„ ,,-t .0, ,.„c.,,,,,,ii, ,. „,,,,„,,•,.f.rit,,.-.)„,!,r7,,:tL,„.;,. .,,,,,,k1, ,A I. .• •,:• / ‘ i. ' i',v. tvniti:•'V.14.1.."• '•• '• •• • gi• b•! 1!)-‘,.,•1.„-T, '1_„1.,-.,:k-- •;•i*. •••avk". 4i,n'1144ii,L.: 4ti ,/eiV•I';•IICI'Vf(31P•rli!Oi V' 1//....N C,$1 1 11 ' :' ' :4(1. .'•A; • 1 t..4:441,"'''.1,_,• ,': l' • '' '7 i;''t.t' • ',:cw.g.m..Si-• li'l... "11-' i'' '• i' - .‘' '• il s)•Vi...'•!.:`(11').‘4•.•1•145111)0,/,A ' ‘ftli\s`-• . 1 I'', 1 • I. 1 '.1` s'.'i' ;. '' :11•44-,f."rw.• -• . - 0;a3 21 c„.2 )::;',)•4 0,4- '4,.110t t.i.:, •1,'.1.,• .'•j(i',"/./1.•6111•;;t'olpir.::, ' Vr. to'''"*. 4t•..i• 11.'. . . •.'1,9•,'..,:!.1 : :,..,i1:4., ! '''=.-.'• .i ..., ' . , i. 4ht.o./ • •‘.i 1 I ''' . • ,•. .' • Zia ' • A -'i r ..,,,,;.),. ‘;...-,:.11 ,/,../.'?. ii;.., A t'll'it 14' VT;f1','M li.''',1%.". .' ' •. • c'(' ••••` • f„.A; -I:A/ ' '' ::(•i it 4.• •6 tr- 1.•1:',I...., ''•••,-.V.1 k•':'•;A.-t itJ'.y.,.. : ;‘,! i r• '.43,k' .‘• •., •• •'ci 1%. / / .....-1.-Ac••••••:',.• •••, • • / \ \ . a. iiIT, • • -A. . ,‘•ak.•7 • • I; 1 :;,?., 0 i- .,....-1T-9 )..ii)..k'‘ . ,;•\l'il,`/./.,1 'A i' L IV 1 1 1 ‘,..,/,.):,.;,. ., f0, •t:,..2 7‘ '" i,',is .. '.• .. s... , '. • ',v.-... ". '.'' i • • t . • - ..vk.1 .C'. •••\/ •,.v..., /. AA.. • .1.i. ,.1 ,f•... -C. A" •'`',.• •',' .yi:t • 4.:, ,.. ,,,..••iti, i / 1 .4kb,41 3...... ....,.,,t Lir. :.,,,..,\(..,. q..,/,,,•,,.,'4,t•v,s,„•• e i ..),.,A.;•,,,... .... .,..•, A , i .ti J 1,.• A'. .1•:‘, 7-+•4.1V ' •I / ...z.;:`,P'a.:: • if i ' .. • 0 1. : l'• :I :" ' ,•''t•, V) ,..1."',..,?1•:1',, itp`y)'4Vy/r.,,‘",..1.,,,'fei i• 3,, .1,1,‘,, • ,,,....: r• , .---1 . s,,,,;•,••), .. •4„••••1•?'; ,•• (•- -,. . ,;:_).. Iv ' :.. . %4 sYl ..•\. 'i:•Y,i i.i\:;• isl!,18t :i`• '•Irl‘'‘;-' VI 11.• .1 .5 ' Tit "i .i. .'\ ) :1..6',• Air•:/`14ki 0, ' ' 91• 4.,„;L.A...i, . •)•'s• i c.• ,,,.• • .., .., ' : . •ke,:, ....c....•'•'' ..,- . . 4.1 eli tri.,••%'‘Xi' . • V '4,4 1- • '. k hi • -;!. 1 -:.f•m;;i. . -, , .,,..• .1... iol; ,,,,, _, ,..4i,,, ,....1.4, •,.•,.: ,,•,\.,,..:L,•,-1 •,., , ,,,,.. I, ,. \!.•1`ti'''' '., . . , t• 2 • • • , • „, !,z,.1,,i.,`..•:. ., .. .. Ili li., i '1 1.•;.CC M. 1 , ,t?," ,14-i •'‘1,'IlVf;.,`;';•1 ::‘,4,i'i;M ilti!)'Pj',. .1;i i 3 v.-, ••• ,./I";1,..'''' ' . , ,„: .:.• . - • i,....r. " I ..1..,..;•. , . ..:\i• ,1•;',„"ila 7.I;.' . , . ,1-, ..tv.s, E. :4.74. '. 7.'1i (.'•\k• •}':'•'•(•• 4(.1-'s 1 '• kikl•,1 ; ....., •=6, .1t2 gt.,. , .i,i (,i.,•,•,.......• ,,..‘i.•;..... .,4f..•‘,-...,k/.,,),. .1...,i.j? ' ;. •• 1 ''4. ).. I. • •ir-4;; ‘...: th •• •• h .'•1,i. itV. . • •:;i4f:51 :.: ', ti tit ......F• ,' t` ,/.. . i i'‘.• .44 .' • '' • , S'./''. ' • -, U i 1/1 i..6.4V?j l'.f •':',l9. I 1 sai?";.\ -,01 , .•',',"',1 1 9•'s.:` 4 ,,.. ..,... . . ..-..„ . •. , . ..,„, •,?..4. 1.4 • '... • •• t . , .. • . ., .. . -•.• 1 'OrAti 1:701:. co/4 -••• 4 .:•••kit.:%,4V,`•••N,'i1• IN,' Ai il. th:'., . , .., • . . c. •.?! a i AE:SP.L.-. ' L. q ‘.., .:.,.: .....•;t. Pi ‘Ti ).!' , . :e8 c.).;g'NJ:.••,A.. i7 N'` "..(--IIN•k.1'.1.•strii. ,.,f..i,il: 7, • .,• g•Akat,'-'••-• - ---,0 -.....6 $••,:, ?h !ie,.!`th‘,...,;;;,.•, -.. .,i-• •• ••. „• . /-011.• - k .; , , , t.,,,•,,•- ,..... • .. `', .,.,‘ .i -.•,• 3 3 ,,i„if'..-2' • ,,,),,Ab..:,r0i. ..• -tig .11 i :. .. ''.:0; ... ./v . . ..:.. .. , -,.' . •'01.'r .FI''' tic)r • . . • ''' : 4 ..-• ,. 3 ialv „t4, 1.: k.,,," '.• .. 1 i 1 ,)../,., ,..va;',.! ;i.,:.*, .,• 3c \ a'$. :.? •••••1•"•'.1 I , -14. • 1 1 .. ,'. 1 . . .,; . Atekridoct-•-..••t•...4.•.1.•...ft...22...0•44. ir.1.41..M.114114 I • 1."4S At' 'ii• crs• .- • fc:1 • -1 -• v• '+•;•.);:-It •;t? ... i I tc:,. • •4' : :,.•.. .1 el 6 ,v,r, / NI ' •,:.„ -•• '''.62:1:6:. ...; "Ok' , '.,...1-3 •-• i ..)'('ANlif .' - • , I: ,,.,...- .. •'' N . • •,1,4,t,c•,.E.v.. S ,i-o. ,V, ‘-* ..i- 4.+.1!./.6 •. •• 44 1 , ,, , , • •4 • '=•ciV• f .P. • I =.ti ci ! CVtie• ' • :-..4.VA.' ffi'2 's •'1 ••-VI, ,• • kixi,41k , . I , 4 ,•!,0,. • '',11\‘d71..r-k-1•: L'' `-‘ . / • ../ 1; ,•,?•0 .fri4. •16 4:, 1 0-• :0 . I...u• -1- ... i . . .4. (p"..:": • J . 1.,. •'4• • .1:01t . ( 1 4". . I!i:k 4.-1 '•!.y4..A ' -••••, . ..f,..1' ,0 :I „,:•11`.k; IA, r A fit .. ee,/... 40, • 0 g CA X x • „,, ..Itirk?'A V i'l 1 ' i • !.. .... I.,. 'I 'v.): . 1 ; i r..!..( . •.:kr.' ;•'•-.•• . t•• , i..• e • ..,.., •-••••••••......._ : ,,. , . i -.3,, • w : .....1 •4 4, Ara f,,u. et 1 -kFi li'•;IL\411.„:1,ft''1•• A• i i••••••.): ,7••\‘,,! • • .....„,k. e • i... -e;•!••-• ' .- - ‘ . i• ,7' •41 i i, . FK i . a. • •'' - ca . -:8 . ',.. t.1 1 p••,., ‘1.'.1•::7 p.k:11 ••\i , ' 1 .14 ,..Ut :.'•,• •'•,- ');r .Lt ' aYX.1,1 i . ,' - ...s,,'.:. 4 " \ \ ,No/ . i tv .•• • ;,..ii, 1•... !•., @ • u ..k,, . .•,!..'":1•4 •...z Ps, .c,•';••, IF L‘• s •:1•1•1 , ,•!,..„.,..A ••• • . ' . • 1 i •• ... ' • 'It.- -47?) • i •;., •r:If:, je,.•;,•,,•.'., II , •.!", el .c•i .•••••)! ...? i 9 t ' x,..,:,,./?-„,. iv ,., ...;; ••.1,);(1:-/,,,, '.i., : '.:('''--::'..; .(1-- rivr, :r.i,,,.....•f,,.c; I ,, 1 f • •Sj.,i. 1 1 r, 2p teA 9,....•,, ..:',,•/'S.:•! ' • i• ' ••• ••••••••1 ••• 4 , Aoac-a . . • •.• • .. . i, a a • ., ' <•-t•`` .41 4 .•Z`•`.47 li • ..,;:•;.•:-,/,:,..T.••.; • , 4:',..,1." •ni.. i•rot --t; • •,., (•• ..e. ••••'-'i I )' 9$466.;,,- S_I'i - ;„..t':1 ': .' •-,', e •c• • • ' ' • 9i 1 ,..,::P.:..1....A. •••.*:-.1••••1i :. II' • I, '-'4..;••,••,• •":‘: ii''i: • • • 141. ‘• ••••• ‘ •- 4 "•r. - Iv1"1 . - .1.1 % P. . . N N -..:•r.t;..- r ' *r• ! ,i.• .1t:4, , 1 i,f ,g/...illtalli •i,n M • : '.•".2 11 f IS .e•r(.., ' ' Zii•.:;;,•',.•..;ii •-,,,,• 1, i '•'‘,1'.\---: ',,•,,,• - ,"1.11' iv.," . • A.*. .. ./,'.',. 2 c;\ 1 1,8-1,,f v..; 4r,....1"...,"P'`•:;.,/A.•.'ilk",.• i l' 1L A. ' `.• .„ ,. . .. If 1' A 3 '. Y.• • .,. s. -... .1:.. ; : • .;•-•.‘ ‘ .'.-1(.4 :-,7. q.... • .. ,\ .• ..• ., t 4 k'," , ,• ••• , 4 ,, rj.Irriti 4 . .•:',•:.•.: dj . ,..'.1“1.4. • '1....VS,G y•;1 1 ....t•••;•• 1:-', '.S.,' .4,::. .... /.....4•, 1' .1 .1,, ,,....; : .4„.. . ; • • .•%•'.\• . • fi.,, . . ''' -\‘'. ''. : ..:te'fi.:1'i 1 1 1, • 14,,V'. , ::. *),,C,4 * ...,'f•i'..",....>•'41t,1(`'N'}' ' 4 •:I l'e. • •• .. • ' • ' ., • .•I ct'.. • •.1••• •‘• \':' .‘• . !,•.•••i • '' •. t . • • ..` •: .' •,1'..),:',t ,4 , .,: ,,e. ....I. j• r .r•N•L".13'-' ''-'''N.'". - • A.,\ , 11 ',pi..-',...1.. „.'44' ,tv. t., -A...',..\.',;••1,. I ., ••• ' . 14, . • •44'111i4! • • :.• •• .4%*.. . :•-••...;;j, *.'''.. 1' ••:` ••:'III' -`!" ' i•;41 -•''T-i•-‘"..,-( ,". 1 ,; ,. • ,, • •,.t- i, • ' : •ii f,i.‘'•,;.' ...s.‘‘.:.. ' :),-..!,'-1.; . „ i - Itj i,, ,- •‘;-.....,‘, i -. ,..s,6 . , • 410 '').?i. •4;47 • b,'.F 1 1,i, '.1 .1.. . •• J,i-i • . •-• .- f ••;1.1. t• I ,-., • •c -. • -...--.-..,a.' 1..)C7)12 4.'•- • ti4 S1'...'" (..V..-2., . k:1.1 1 ' fc•I'Al.•• • • - • •• -.6.4... I • 1•• 1,1 , • ..>.-1• -tv • '•••1‘'.: .• ;1 4, _%,!-.,!,.‘..i.t.c.-.7,,,,' 1, . .p. . .•ki • !: fil,t!\''t'I.- :t.' •• . '.. 41' i . ''' i ' : ' ''' ',L,' • V ft'' •• ..: • •i1:-'. ii .1•Wil\•...... Z.('11 I‘,11.1.. ii e, 4 • , .'T.:N'•• •;4 • '',..\.. ''.' ti- .. i 1 44' '.-.. ..1 :!,).,•::to ID .: 1 • • I Ai.,,1 %,11.,... t:....i, ,',:*..:; .11 . :..:t•ei•l,4, _:',,,,Ica.s'.i8-3'1,-?, •.,• 1..°./,,iy.k. ),I*•,.10. ..1 . • ,•!,‘.•,•••;;../.,.::, ;, •a. II •4•.r4,, eTai rt/i r•,,e?-`4, ' i-1••.1,. :17...1•;;1Vii;. :4..)k. • ,I.ir.t`...;)%, L qi iit 1,..I..r.1 ial'it.il{,1.r.k..v,`c•:1,:,............:. '...;/,' ;.1.,,..7.t.1,.. . isitt ) I 1 1 • . .„ 1.. A - I l ,t, . A .• %....., ii,..,•14L:‘ ,,e 4.,., -. . • .c, . • .1 • . tit .,. .4,c:,,,-. ,,,•-,R.w ET ;4:;rA:*, ilt. ';,•,',1W.,, -;1,qX),...; . ' ;A' '',..f:,.., :i.„i : .i; 1.11 .r. ..-,,,•44.1 .,"),: ,`,... -.•-.7..V.,..., .i... ' . ,..4,-'1"i/L'.._•,t•.3---. • ) '44, ;,...,,tet,-;,..,,i,-.:-..7: .,,,,It:`;'T ..,c,k:sy.a..•••• I II ,I.,, i • ,...\‘..•1/,I..,,,,A••-•• , 3,...,f, )„),,,,Iairt. 0,•e-,mo'•••ttl 1 - •,.. • . •• • r": • • - , _ I 'N's••:-•( i ie &..1); 44 "-.'ktj .." .a.: Ali:ca el.D. • •• vs ,....t. . .1,....:...;,. ..1„ . ...... . . . 411 •.•t iit-4,(utt,S .,--,i.•':••• 0 .1 ....., • iii h. .q.• •t. i• ; % 'y ' fs?„),•-..r o•c' .a t•co, , J., .,, A..,i.).1,...si;cf. ;••,-...„ kz. q'.f. 1%)•• 1 VI i! t LI V:7-f741' •Vi',1:".-,N- •1•.., ' ...-••• ,..• •......7..- • . ,. &Ail.'.413•711.?" ' V.fil 4,4"-,N.,42'"!.:,:-" ,,,,k!..- --',..V3-i4X7r\-k‘4_'•‘ i0 .:Aq 1,11.1•44P.$1,'s•iil;4k:'-'_,•••,-:,...%:.'1,-,;" , ' • , eh Iii•.:*--i, • -• •I 4. PI crj lilt %-1.,..--t?!..:2-,ts 'E.:itiff./..tes: ( 4.3.. \t‘..I. ,77.:''.......!Aussk:',L.',;':;\;;Vill.,,:,'*.e., . : ;ft .:. ,,..1.7,t("lw,it,,T\!,C,..,s1;:.\-:::\, ;'1,y,i7:,c.7:: :: i ••• i'' ... ..'s•.4... , ' '• ','44i Ai!ii.ii-,!1i .f . • .,(1 11',1,1,,,•• A. 0 0,E 00* el:.• :i L•s., ti. •IlecivI•\• Fts.,. „.•,,,,t 0,,k,•. ..ki,- 11 .. )$xi): .i':.C4 V\•:::.,,-•!.\"•-•.:0•l'.---'4,‘?1,:if , , 7 i a.. .I .;'•:, • I.. ""•• -• • ., • •tt. l• . •A , •4•'.. 1111 :,,.. .,.,,,,.. A ‘ms- "D•e•D•15711EZ. ‘.1.'r q': r‘••!'..X.e,>f10i.-.4t.•;"?Z:.:.1,'#) ,4 :",••Al. ., i i. , • '....$ -5:1.q..4` • t::,k.'!7-„,!,r, 4 ) . : -''t.s.i. . Lq,,4 , . .,,,, , , . , ‘..,5 L. . •7ic.. ,4eg I 0;...."....2 4e i3ti.1.0. '4"...i • ."4.... , I..:••• ii7... 'I.4 fri\‘'•,..,. ''''‘....!i ' . ' i i,A) VV.i : '). .f'‘'=".%r ,c,i . ; el.: Ts,., 4, .;i '•- 4. ' "q..• 0 Z g''0.84,,,4'"',11 1.46' (" • .tk s't-1. .1! !" •%, \CI. 1 ,si'r.' ' • ''. c ' • r• "ariA'9't IX.. '1‘,,,* c.„$•i: 1 0 Le , i.r..„c=, -.•=_ 0 ,•,,•T;C -_,4. ;.,iv , •,:,-v. ,1 !,. ,•-.; • 'crl• i Vtl" ,, ;it•A'i4. ' li,j .3'. .‘i c'N''.%4 •'Lk..11j,41;i. •i• If. .• tV; ' .1. KY,4.' 3'CI3'd•••2'U.-M)•;(e171 4•••.'ir ••••‘'\ .'t..r.'i,,,Q •A;.•...-`,A,/,‘, .. ,.. ,r i:„.ft - ,.,:-,,e.ok.••,,,,•....y)) ",),)+0 ..,.,,•to ;:.,:•,- ... • i. 1)". ',',,,,;:. , . -• • ''''," . ,:,•'•.:,:.. t, .:•:.c.•••.`,.:::::':''11:::.14:11"...;11:q'' r•a .0:ii.u,,-.s.f,ot.,2-9 i,.:01. :,i-Nlv.,,\:,N1., :.,,cf,.›.::ff,,t,t..„.,,'4...,(:leik.,,,ovi,. . Jr..(,?....- :,:i..,..1,k:Pficgr::;:.,4 ,.iqy'(".if.,.g .:, i . -... ....ili ;• itv ,,‘ ,‘I t ..1 , . . , •.. ....„ . . ...... ..,„ . ... . ., i 4.',.-70!)a--- 12 c•ri••01.1.,' ":1••• •,. 0•.`(.t.,;'•.:1. s`••;1..'0"-'t. }A-:I yi •'ii7... .',Q,----""A.•";%::,. `S,. 'is.+•'.,•--",7,i,"•,) ,-'•,;..,1; „s. ' •• . •• a, . ..• !,„, : . , •• • • ' .vv.' • • ,•,••.„.•••••.c„... 0 ••••v.: n•-7 • e .A•'s ."*. . . • .......'t-."" .11..(')..'\t ''1‘1';'‘I'l-sf.1.r''''... . ‘.'1 21;F.A. ----:. 1.1: 1 . ..,...., j ,"Zo.'•*17."-A)I.= -.$'6). ;Os\ ! ..,,,,;a11. 1, ; •, .•,,„ k..:.:,...NL•ale.„ .,. ..... 1,X,..?,,:,71,••:..17.,,,".L,s.L.'s,,7y4, •., A , ri •1,.. .. A.4„,-. IV- „Pl. • - ilit• ,1 • -la,:••••,., i•-,mr:yeti ia.a•••••12t,,••••••••. • T.. ..r,j • )- it.:4 . ' Ci:;,•il Li"4..---1.. •c7;...-41 .„,..- t - .. )...:-‘r::;a:41-4t.6 „4",.., ,r.,,. ,.,,r,,,..!..1„...,,,,....c.,..•,..,40,,„ , , . •f-J.;vr• '•••;A:•••• 9„tp1-0.:'••`?-......,-;••').:4- • •t.t : • • .,rAlit,FAIV.01 ,,I -. .- •,'•Ii- ,31*,"";`'OrIliv•-'0•••:44v,i-e:tif-' a k:••• ....-Niii•• i443:`4.4•....• . ' ' '4 r ',IW- •4-1-PV11-.,..:3:$1y.,,S'i!Vg,iir,..% ,, ..:. •-• . ,•,.. ‘ 6'--•'')..._ w.±.: ,ti,:;-... . :. • ,. . .., 4 .. .. . • •sr.r.?••••.- -• -4,,,i0 ......4 . ,... ,,. - - - • • • • „ • . imr4,,,jiser S 8, . .TTACHMENT # 4 • • 1'e0 des . , • plant . dsh . Iiffer ' series 8• • • receptacles plant • ash • ; _ i .„,.. ., _ ..-1,c,,,.:.;,F),. 1 tii. ,0, w.,._:, . • DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS , ,. . } ;`'.' i i WOOD: Wood members are 11h"x21h" with t 1 `,I ?t.i.1!, ,l- coved back to mate steel drum and mitered butt i., ' ' '•, "Y, 'Y fit sides. Wood members are permanently . IN - •,.,l , f j' '.I it. ;V, lti'�.: . ,,1 attached to steel drum. t; 'Pi)j t i • SIZE:211h"diameter,31"high. �'`, 1j�j 1.i.t, t'Ci S i :: • MODEL: 4 i,i i:; 1,!•`! ` '{I ' 8.1 is Trash Receptacle having removable gal- -; 1, • t; .l' ji f,'! ' • I vanized liner. -'-''. i ,f1 l; ilici -..�•'-,. `! •,, I I r ; 8.2 is Ash Um/Trash Receptacle combination •; • ti...,i ' i .f‘•(i'l' i• having removable galvanized liner. , ,-i '. +, ..7, 1 8.3 is Ash Urn/Receptacle. 1 11*. 1 :u i 8.4 is Planter having alio" formed top trim in black polyurethane. ". I t:... :' , 8.5 is Trash Receptacle with black polyurethane 4 weatherhoad for maximum durability and protection. 8.1 TRASH - :1 — TOP '?"� ;� - .y 1 .`• i • -...... !. ..• I 8.2 ASH URN - '-- , --" • STEEL �si ` DRUM i TRASH COMBINATION fly T-7" —1.. . ._'.., • WOOD ` °~` CLAD t�f _ REMOVABLE I 1 t GALVANIZED :'-_.! --_"`..... — LINER I--1'-9'fz"dia---I , o041 , ....,...,,,. _ -.......11111111.;‘ --� y 8.3 ASH URN 8.5 WE:ATHE.RHOOD '�� __• :.„t':i:,.71 [:-.P.767 •• 8.4 PLANTER TOP TRIM _, �i= .. ` cam.... .•tt' ' ___,...,_ FRANCES/ANDREW INC. IMIUMMEREBBE , S': ate_ , . ■■■■■■■■■ !••.i... ■.■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ �• I ■■■■ ■■ ■ ■■■.■ ■■■■.■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■..■■■■■■■...■■■■. ■■■■■■..■ A■. ■=■■C■C■■. ■C■■■. . _. .E- - _ -� ' ,.■■■■.■■■. ■...■■■■■■■■....■■■■C■■■■■■■■■ ■■■C.■ .■.■.■ _ ■.■■■_. _ ! ■ _ _- -• I m■■■.■■■■■■�s000■.■■■■■■■■o■■■s■■■■■■ . ■■■ mom ■■ ■o■ m D_ . ■■! _.- mmoom■so■o■■ ■■sm■sm■ms■ . ■■■ moms ■■ ■■ ' ■ ■_ _ . - 0■�m■ ■ ■■■■■■■m■oMmomm■■■■■■■■CI■_11■■■mmm C ■ _ - - . . - - - - .- .- ■ _ mom- - 0- _- .. - -- . , ,,, z 1111111111111 11111 1 "' `� o �r �- 111111!!l111! INI111! a J w 11 N M z 11111111111111111111111 � E O - -- �.m.s■■■■s.■■■ ■■■■■■■■ ri Z 5 _ Z .o ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■_ - F D - p > �^ -a gt ms■■m..C.so..■■■■m■■■.■ e m . a 0' . ci _, -^- • 0 ■ss.sm ....■..■■msssm. N E 3 2 W w Z 1111 0 J Z Q - - - IIIIII11111111111111111 �e� H Z ; • m . z0 III1IIIIIUuI1IIHhIHhIIH a fl id 111111 1111 1111111 111E111 yN ' aaa3N = 22 ___. ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Q `T1 O lL m N Z ■ a - - 111 I _1 { b,, o�, / �A71,`d1Y�SAf1rJy\� I II Sr:'}1� ('.`��::�'l)'( 1� '.1 JIt$!y1• 2n'4• I N cy) • Ill / :'WSJ aY 1��alSii'Stq '�� OS Yyr 7 c. !n:! : a, o III t'. 4110 i N MOM ji rt / StS'}t't' VI fie f' �, .. ccsu' ,f NM 1;0,a7 `y^r l• Wit iiT. a- o+ — E ao c�i caeO) o - 4 ' 1 c 'll• ■ o N N 7 7 8 ' t t+ ■ Er vow E II! ig !flo � � No m . iI t•' ' 1, • S \A 1 Q 0 cS 4'.� o� _ l tip ;, : .. _ - lL •c o > ; r� rn 7 n Ili '''.. . ' H. .' . . . . ' ) ;. 111 .. ... : i .*.'/.i. 1... .:/,.i/ .I1 \k.)P\Ii, IIIC‘I ';. ccaErlP M- 5CWL %20 ll! QEI Qvc oU 3F- cv o a - - /, 1 2 T CI - I ■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■■ ■ ■-■■■■.■■■■■■■■■■C■■=■■1■■■■=C.1C10� 0� - 1 C�1-C-C1 -- - - - - -- -- - _ _ _ UU..U.::::1:::::::::::::C!!'::::1:!!!■■■U:::1:: mmommompolo moommoml1:1 mo:-.- _ _ . A S' L 5JUi7'NG/ZONING DEPT, March 8, 1988 Mr. Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator - City of Renton, Building and Zoning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 989055 Renton Village Cinema Expansion SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-103-87; EEF-090-87) . LETTER OF AGREEMENT: As a condition for the City of Renton to grant site plan approval for the Renton Village Cinema Expansion project, (City File #SA-103-87), Renton Village Associates, owners, agree to modify in the future certain site improvements approved under #SA-103-87, by providing at the time of installation of a future street, those site improvements as indicated on the Attachment drawings #7B and #10C - re: future landscaping and related site development associated with the construction of a new future street along the northeast side of the lot. Those future modifications are hereby approved by the City of Renton and no further site plan review or approval is necessary to implement those revisions when future street is installed. This work will be deferred until the actual construction of the street and at that time completed in accordance with the afore mentioned plans and all pertinent City ordinances. • The obligations of this agreement will be fulfilled and the agreement terminated upon City of Renton inspection and approval of the completed work. Renton Village Associates date City of Renton, Building and Zoning date bc/st123 ,The Callison Part hip ' 'r 3 {.1 ;it li r,. • C Lu'LD: jc'/ZONiNG DEPT. March 8, 1988 Architecture - Programming Planning Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator • Interior Design City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 RE11ION VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Site Plan Approval (File No. SA-103-87; ECF-090-87) Project Number 87247 • • Responses to the EtC requests for additional information prior to their recommendations on the site plan approval. Responses to the comments are provided here in the order originally given by the City: • 1. DRAINAGE: Since the City drainage project is not determined as to configuration or schedule, Renton Village Associates (RVA) assumes participation in the project will be deferred. RVA can plrovide only a conceptual drainage plan at this preliminary phase of the project. The City stated this would be adequate. (See attachment #17). 2. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION: The only existing walks are around the Evergreen Building and existing cinema and also along the Renton Village Place S. Street which terminates behind Ernst. The proposal extends the walks around and between the cinema and Evergreen Building and will connect to the future public street extension of Renton Village Place S. to S. Grady Way. This will connect the cinema pedestrian patrons to the known bus stops on Grady and Talbot. ¶L additional attachments are being provided to clarify the future work needed on the lot to conform to the future street. (see attachments #7B and #10C). 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 The Callison Partnership Ltd.,ACorporation Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and. Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 March 4, 1988 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Site Plan Approval (File No. SA-103-87; E F-090-87) Project Number 87247 page 2 No cross-site walks to the hotel now exist nor are any planned. RVA strongly recommends that if this type of improvement is considered by the City, the design and improvements should be addressed at the time of the development and construction of the shopping center lot and the public street extension. This would allow establishment of the exact configurations and circulation options on the site. RVA would prefer to not have a pedestrian connection with the hotel property. Pedestrian circulation connections between the other lots owned by RVA and the opportunity for the connections to the Renton Place office buildings are being considered and planned by RVA. 3. LAYOUT AND DESIGN OF PARKING: See attacbntuL #7B for the configuration of the parking after the future street is constructed. 4. OPEN SPACE - EXISTING AND PROPOSED: Despite the significant increase in the floor area of the cinema, the additional landscaped areas being provided on the lot has kept the total impervious area increase to only 2%. The existing, designated, public, open-space area on the lot is 27,400 sf. The actual, usable portion within the existing area (paved areas with and without seating) is only approximately 4,350 sf. The remainder of the existing area consists of asphalt walks through bark dust areas planted with primarily eveLgreen shrubs and trees. The proposed designated, public, open-space area is 8,760 sf between the Evergreen Building and the Cinema. Approximately 8,850 sf of the existing open area will resin. The prupused public areas will include a combination of existing and new deciduous shade trees and large lawn areas throughout the spaces with benches and tables provided in several areas. With the introduction of these amenities and materials in the new and existing areas, all of the proposed areas are considered usable. 5. NOISE MITIGATION REGARDING PUBLIC OPEN SPACES: A professional acoustic consultant did a sound reading at both the existing and proposed spaces and the results were included in the approval package. Noise levels (from I-405) were significant in both locations, naturally higher in the pLopused location as it is closer to the freeway. While this noise is not desirable, no mitigating measures are planned primarily due to the physical properties required to control this "overhead" noise source. This noise is viewed as an existing, unfortunate and undesirable fact of this area of the city. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and. Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 March 4, 1988 SON VILLAGE CINEMA, EXPANSION Site Plan Approval (File No. SA 103-87; PXF-090-87) Project Number 87247 Page 3 6. AESTHETICS OF VISIBLE ROOF AREA; COMPATIBILITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF ARCHITECTURAL RESPONSE OF THE EXTERIOR BUILDING DESIGN: The nature and size of the cinema requires the cooling units be located directly over the areas requiring conditioning. This prevents a centralized location of roof top equipment and the potential use of a roof screen enclosure. . , The cut sheets of the cooling units provided in the approval package show clean, rectangular, self-contained units that will be painted to match the building. (The city noted that the visibility of the roof (from up on the hill) was probably not extrenely negative, however features to minimize the industrial appearance world be beneficial such ba llast as gravel roof coverings, possibly in patterns). Ctiavel �-�las roof systems or parapet extensions are being discussed with the General Chien' Architects. THE BUILDING DESIGN EXPRESSION: As opposed to an urban theatre, this building typifies the American vernacular of the suburban mall-type cinema. This vernacular is primarily a result of the economics and function of the industry and the building use. The material selection is of a material similar to typical mall structures - concrete, CMU, steel. (Some advantages this cinema does have over others is that an historical sense of the "Event" of attending a "Movie Theatre" is presented in the elevated, processional entry. This sense is also reinforced by the festive trim colors, the building highlighting, the billboard cases and the dominant marquee. Several of these features and colors extend into the lobby and concession area) . See attachments #18 and #12B (Photo of prototype cinema and rendered elevation to clarify the character of the proposed cinema). 7. ALTERNATIVES - The city requested design background on the proposal - alternate approaches: General Cinema Corporation (GCC) is the current tenant (with an extended lease) and they do their own building design. The plan is a modified version of one of their stock plans (their typical procedure is to build from totally stock plans) . The design/development parameters for this cinema were to maintain a minimum square footage, 8-plex configuration, that would fit within the powerline easements directly to the northeast and south of the building. RVA suggested a multi (two) story building be considered due to these tight space restrictions. GCC responded that they had investigated this approach in several other locations and determined the additional construction and operating costs were too prohibitive.. GCC will not consider any multilevel cinema plans. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and. Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington . 98055 March 4, 1988 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Site Plan Approval (File No. SA-103-87; EC!-090-87) Project Number 87247 page 4 GENERAL: The city requested that since the cinema lot was so dependent on the future street configuration, the engineering department should review and approve the location and configuration of the proposed future street. RVA noted that in prior conversation with them regarding a street reservation for the submittal, it was the consideration of the engineering department that the future street design not be connected to the cinema development approval. The City agreed with this consideration and only requested that the alignment and curves be reviewed as they pertain to the cinema lot.line. The future street configuration has been submitted to the Public Works Dept. for review and approval of the sLLeL right-of-way alignment and curve radius at those areas adjacent to the cinema lot. weir response is to be sent to the Zoning Dept. LIST OF ATTACKS: Attachment #7B - Future site plan with future street configuration (approx.) Attachment #10C - Future landscape areas with future street configuration (approx.) Attachment #12B - Color rendered elevation of proposed cinema. Attachment #17 - Conceptual drainage plan. Attachment #18 - Photograph of prototype GCC cinema. RVA/'ICP hope these responses provide the information and clarification requested by the ERC. If their are further questions please contact Brian Cloepfil, The Callison Partnership, ASAP. Your speed and assistance in the expedition of this site plan approval is sincerely appreciated. Brian C. Cloepfil The Callison Partnership bc/st126 cc: Renton Village Associates: Mike Sandorffy Renton Village Management Corp. : Loren Laskow The Callison Partnership: Rick Ring, file 10 The Callison Part-- - ship March 4, 1988 Architecture Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator `L., �i t ti4 Programming V t'"= Planning City of Renton, Building and Zoning Interior Design I 200 Mill Ave. S. -�- Renton, Washington 98055 L ''' 8 Le8 ij REroe "11Project Number Nur 87247 ��CINEMA EXPANSION R )Fr'i/[OIV►n,G DEPT MEETING MINUTES Site Plan Approval (File No. SA-103-87; BCF-090-87) Lot line Adjustment (File No. LLA-001-88) • Those Don Erickson City of Renton, Building and Zoning (City) Jerry Lind City of Renton, Building and Zoning (City) Lenore Blauman City of Renton, Building and Zoning (City) Loren Laskow Renton Village Management CoLpration (RVA) Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership (TuP) Purpose: To discuss City Comments: Resolution of future site configuration control for the Site Plan Approval; Resolution of the future property development standards for the Lot Line Adjustment. Location City of Renton, Third floor conference. A. 'i P inquired as to formal submittal procedure for the responses to the ERC comments. Mr. Lind stated approximately 4 sets would be sufficient to be delivered to the front counter at the City. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-.1646 he Callison Partnership ltd.,A Corporation Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton, Building and Zoning 200.Mill Ave. S. Renton, Washington 98055 March 8, 1988 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Project Number 87247 MEETING MINUTES page 2 B. The proposed agreement letter (see attached) and attached plans for the Site Plan Approval, regarding future lot configuration and development at the time of future street construction, were discussed. The City had not had time to thoroughly review the agreement (previously submitted) . The agreement approach was generally acceptable. The plan was discussed and considered generally acceptable. The drive locations on the future street were agreed to be approximate pending future site planning. The City requested additional pedestrian access from the Cinema/Evergreen Building area to the future street. It was agreed to provide an additional walk from the Evergreen Building end (along the islands beneath the power lines) out to the future street. This would provide a circular path to and from the Evergreen Building/Cinema area from either the S. Grady Way or Talbot Road directions. C. The Lot Line Adjustment agreement (see attached) was discussed. Again, the City had not had time to thoroughly review the agreement. The agreement approach was generally acceptable. In addition to the standards included in the agreement, the City requested development standards (i.e. : a plan) be submitted to indicate the development of the entire future street on RVA property - a semblance of a Master Plan. This would include landscaping, walks, lighting, etc. TCP noted that the street lighting design was typically determined by the City engineering standards. The City stated that with the power line height restrictions there might be an option to use lower, nonstandard street lighting. They will discuss this with Public Wbrks. The City also noted potential locations for carpool/bus shelters. TCP stated that with several of the drive locations only approximate (and the Ernst store as an existing non conforming use adjacent to the street) TCP could only provide a plan indicating approximate configurations while communicating the overall standards of site/landscape development. The City explained it was their desire to have site standards, and a site plan on file as a guarantee of the future site/landscape development of the property, regardless of future owner or City staff. They currently don't feel the Site Plan Approval process provides them with this control. TCP stated that the intent of the piuposal was to provide assurance that RVA will perform as indicated on the remaining site development. RVA feels a title covenant to accomplish this is unacceptable and has been advised against using this method by their legal counsel. The City stated they will have the City Attorney review both agreements for further comment. Mr. Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton, Building and Zoning 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, Washington 98055 Match 8, 1988 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Project Number 87247 MEETING MINUTES page 3 D. The City inquired as to whether the State modifications to I-405 would impact the lot. RVA stated that no new communications had taken place with the State but from prior discussions, it is RVA's understanding that they will not affect property boundaries. E. The City stated that the project would be on the Wednesday, March 9, ERC agenda and that it would be beneficial to have the majority of the ERC comment responses and information available to the committee for that meeting. TCP will submit all info. available by Tuesday eve. F. TCP inquired as to the City response to Seattle City Light planting restrictions. The City will research to see if they have any precedence regarding negotiations with City Light. G. TCP noted that plans had been submitted to Dick Houghton, Public Works, last week for review of the street configuration and location adjacent to the cinema lot and that they will respond directly to Building and Zoning. They will inquire on progress.. These minutes are an accurate account of the meeting comments to the best of my knowledge. Please contact me if any questions arise or any discrepancies are observed. Brian C. Cloepfil The Callison Partnership bc/st139 cc: Those Present Renton Village Associates: Mike Sandorffy The Callison Partnership: Rick King, file 10 February 24, 1988 Mr. Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton, Building and Zoning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 989055 Renton Village Cinema Expansion SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-103-87; ECF-090-87) Lh'r lF:R OF AGREEMENT: As a condition for the City of Renton to grant site plan approval for the Renton Village Cinema Expansion project, (City File #SA-103-87), Renton Village Associates, owners, agree to modify in the future certain site improvements approved under #SA-103-87, by providing at the time of installation of a future street, those site improvenents as indicated on the Attachment drawings #7B and #10C - re: future landscaping and related site development associated with the construction of a new future street along the northeast side of the lot. Those future modifications are hereby approved by the City of Renton and no further site plan review or approval is necessary to implement those revisions when future street is installed. This work will be deferred until the actual construction of the street and at that time completed in accordance with the afore mentioned plans and all pertinent City ordinances. The obligations of this agreement will be fulfilled and the agreement terminated upon City of Renton inspection and approval of the completed work. Renton Village Associates date City of Renton, Building and Zoning date bc/st123 I FRAM; SHIPPER NAME_ TO CONSIGNEE NAME �' CONTROL NUMBER • + I� ;rat +v 7' _', C" -i'i h)I . `...,--- .-rr • + t_• 1 / • ADDRESS . ADDRESS DATE ": r,, DRIVER 1 l DRIVER 2 CITY ZIP ZONE CITY ZIP , - ZONE CUSTOMER NUMBER CHARGE TO: SHIPPING CHARGE SERVICE TYPE CODE CHARGES f fL'. r-:'II...I....f SUN! EAR I NE'.{"'F;1--.' F' - - PPD' CDLL . DESCRIPTION OF GOODS(SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/INFORMATION I DRIVER PAYOUT/ETC.) PIECES WEIGHT !. s?:.;,r. -`-'r. CUST.REF • _..-1 ,',--,.) 1 ._'..—."-::-I. CUST.,•REF.2 -,.� �' . ' DECLARED VALUE C 0 D AMOUNT CHARGES WAIT TIME WAIT TIME CUST.REF.3 ‘ PPD; COLL SHIPPER / PICK-U/P DRIVER ' TP.U.DATE DEL.DATE RECEIVED IN GOOD ORDER TOTAL CHARGES' 1 / i`, ` . % }!}. ,P.U.rTVME , DEL.TIME ENA TEI_. .F.:1-iONa, ,�27,4•--.73:..Oc 845400 COURIERS DELIVERY RECEIPT TEIi a°;'iVD CONDI IONS • 1. The carrier shall be liable only for loss, damage or injury to the goods carried and then only to the ext of the value of those goods,which value the customer agrees shall not exceed$2.00 per pound for all go( :: carried under this bill of lading, unless a higher value is declared in writing by the customer. :11. 1., 2. . No liability for such loss,damage or injury shall exist unless the customer gives notice in writing to the car; •"- .. within 9 months of such event. • 3. All shipments received are subject to local tariffs, terms and conditions with respect to rates and paym' either as imposed by law and regulation and all delivery charges must be paid in accordance therew The Callison Party `;hip • February 29, 1988 Mr. Jerry Lind, Zoning Dept. Architecture City of Renton Programming Planning 200 Mill Avenue S. Interior Design Renton, Washington 98055 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Site Plan Approval and Lot Line Adjustment (File No. SA-103-87; ECF-090-87) Dear Jerry, Per our telephone conversation, I am sending you two copies of the plans and agreement proposals for review prior to our meeting, Friday, March 4, at 11:00 a.m. We are submitting the plans to clarify what the configuration of the cinema lot will be after the public street construction. The agreement proposal is offered for definition and deferment of the construction of these areas affected by the future street. The landscape/site standards agreement is offered in response to concern for maintaining site consistency for the remainder of the property. These are the standards we have planned on using. The intent is: (1) This agreement would be filed for future reference (for those not familiar with the history of the site), at site plan approval on the remainder of the RVA lots/projects (RVA agrees and would not contest these consistency requirements); (2) In the unlikely event that the property is no longer owned by RVA, the Site Plan Approval process alone still allows the City to require a new owner to maintain consistent standards. We look forward to discussing these proposals with you. Respectfully, 0.(//er /4 " /77 CITY OF R.7NTO:I Brian C. Cloepfil n The Callison Partnership be/st130 MAR 03 1QRQ cc:File 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 • (206)623-4646 The Callison Partnership Ltd.,A Corporation February 24, 1988 Mr. Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton, Building and Zoning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 989055 Renton Village Cinema Expansion SITE PLAN APPROVAL (SA-103-87; DCF-090-87) LETTER OF AGREEMENT: As a condition for the City of Renton to grant site plan approval for the Renton Village Cinema Expansion project, (City File #SA-103-87), Renton Village Associates, owners, agree to modify in the future certain site improvements approved under #SA-103-87, by providing at the time of installation of a future street, those site improvements as indicated on the Attachment drawings #7B and #10C - re: future landscaping and related site development associated with the construction of a new future street along the northeast side of the lot. Those future modifications are hereby approved by the City of Renton and no further site plan review or, approval is necessary to. implement those revisions when future street is installed. This work will be deferred until the actual construction of the street and at that time completed in accordance with the afore mentioned plans and all pertinent City ordinances. The obligations of this. agreement will be fulfilled and the agreement terminated upon City of Renton inspection and approval of the completed work. Renton Village Associates date City of Renton, Building and Zoning date CITY OF Ft•-NTl "� bc/st123 MAR 1g88 BUtL DEPT. The Callison Partnership' cn Y 0 r RENTON ll � BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. To: ,VViiC/< Date: 2 .`Z` 'Transmittal -G/� V� a7V Project No: 07 7 ❑Memorandum AD/W/_Y/�' ��/►'//VC iLL- / Re: ��+` a r �'� L //&- f 4 , )y'5 1 97 1474 / We are sending you ,ttached ❑Under separate cover the following: ❑Prints ❑Originals ❑Submittal ❑Samples ❑ For your: N<lnformation and use ❑Review and comment ❑As requested Action required: ❑As indicated ❑No action required 0 For signature and return • By: Wt— cc: If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once. Architecture 1423 Third Avenue (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation Programming Suite 300 Planning Seattle,Washington Interior Design 98101 The Callison Partnershir February 19, 1988 Architecture Programming Planning Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator Interior Design City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 MEETING MINUTES Project Number 87247 Those Present: Don Erickson City of Renton Building and Zoning Jerry Lind City of Renton Building and Zoning Mike Sandorffy Renton Village Associates (RVA) Loren Laskow Renton Village Management Corp. Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership Purpose: To clarify and discuss City of Renton E.R.C. comw nts on Site Plan Approval and couuints on Lot line adjustment. Location: City of Renton, Third floor conference, 2:00 p.m. Discussion of the comments is provided here in the order originally given by the City. 1. Drainage: In addition to expected participation in the City drainage project, the City requested a conceptual site drainage plan be submitted for review. RVA noted that since the drainage project is not determined as to configuration or schedule, they assume this participation would be deferred. RVA can provide only a corms upLual drainage plan at this preliminary phase of the project. The City stated this would be adequate. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 The Callison Partnership Ltd.,A Corporation Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 February 19, 1988 MEETING MINUTES Project Number 87247 page 2 2. Pedestrian circulation: The City asked for explanation of existing and proposed circulation on the site (sidewalks) and connections to Public transit routes. RVA explained that the only existing walks are around the Evergreen Building and existing cinema and also along the Renton Village Place S. street which terminates behind Ernst. The proposal extends the walks around and between the Cinema and Evergreen Building and will connect to the future public street extension of Renton Village Place S. to S. Grady Way. This will connect the Cinema pedestrian patrons to the known bus stops on Grady and Talbot. Since the exact configuration and intersections of the future street are not determined, the actual walk connection location is not offered at this time. The City responded that some form of commitment must be given to provide this pedestrian linkage in the future such as a deferred improvement condition. The City also asked about pedestrian linkage between the Hotel and the Evergreen Building. RVA explained that no cross-site walks to the Hotel now exist nor are any planned. RVA noted that the Hotel owner probably would not be interested nor participate in this type of cross-property connection. 3. Layout and design of parking: The City expressed concern/confusion of the parking configuration directly in front of the cinema. RVA explained that the parking is laid out to meet the configuration of the future street - allowing a ten foot landscaped setback and no additional drives onto the future street. Again, the City responded that same form of commiLuenL to provide the future landscape requirements would be required. 4. Open space - existing and proposed: This concerns the public open areas. RVA noted that concerning pervious areas, despite the significant increase in the floor area of the cinema, the additional landscaped areas being provided has kept the impervious area increase to only 2%. The City requested actual area calculations of the existing and proposed "park-like" portions of the public open areas for comparison. RVA will provide these areas. Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 February 19, 1988 MEETING MINUTES Project Number 87247 page 3 5. Noise mitigation regarding public open spaces: A professional acoustic consultant did a sound reading at both the existing and proposed spaces and the results were included in the Approval package. Noise levels (from 1-405) were significant in both locations, naturally higher in the proposed location as it is closer to the freeway. While this noise is not desirable, no mitigating measures are planned due to the space of the proposed area and primarily due to the physical properties required to control this "overhead" noise source. This noise is viewed as an undesirable feature of this area of the city. 6. Aesthetics of visible roof area; Compatibility and appropriateness of architectural response of the exterior building design: RVA explained that the nature and size of the cinema required the cooling units be located directly over the areas requiring conditioning. This prevented a centralized location of roof top equipment and the potential use of a roof screen enclosure. The cut sheets of the cooling units provided in the Approval package show clean, rectangular, self-contained units that will be painted to match the building. The City noted that the visibility of the roof (from up on the hill) was probably not extremely negative, however features to minimize the industrial appearance would be beneficial such as gravel roof coverings, possibly in patterns. Regarding the building design expression, as opposed to an urban theatre, this building typifies the American vernacular of the suburban mall-type cinema. This vernacular is primarily a result of the economics and function of the use and of a similar material to typical mall structures - concrete, cmu, steel. (Advantages this cinema has is that a sense of the "Event" of attending a "classic cinema" is presented in the elevated, "processional" entry and reinforced by the festive trim colors, highlighting and marquee. Several of these classic reference features extend into the lobby and concession area) . The City requested photos of existing similar cinemas be provided to help show the character of the cinema or renderings if no photos possible. (The cinema does not attempt to relate physically to the Evergreen Building. An attempt to tie these two different uses of buildings visually would probably negatively impact both - see comment 7) . Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 February 19, 1988 MEETING MINUTES Project Number 87247 page 4 7. Alternates: The City requested design background on the proposal - alternate approaches. RVA explained that General Cinema Corporation is the current tenant (with a lease of approx. ten more years) and that they do their own building design. In this case, the plan is a modified version of one of their stock plans (their typical procedure is to build from totally stock plans) . The parameters were to maintain a minimum square footage, 8-plex configuration, that would fit within the powerline easements directly to the northeast and south of the building. RVA suggested a multi (two) story building be considered due to these tight space restrictions. GCC responded that they had investigated this approach in several other locations and determined the additional construction and operating costs were prohibitive. They will not consider any multi-level cinema plans. As a clarification to some of the questions the City raised regarding commitment to the future public street and public open spaces, RVA presented their first, preliminary site plan of the shopping center lot for informal discussion. This plan showed a proposed office building and parking structure on the site and how the new street would be configured and developed at that time. The proposal also showed a potential second office building that would relocate some of the retail on the site and expand the parking structure. In keeping with the approach proposed on the cinema lot, smaller, user-specific public open spaces are proposed adjacent to the various uses (office buildings) . The plan also suggested how the pedestrian links could be achieved and how the future, street would impact the cinema parking area. The City requested that since the cinema lot was so dependent on the future street configuration, the engineering department should review and approve the location and configuration of the proposed future street. RVA noted that in conversation with them regarding a street reservation, it was the consideration of the engineering department that the future street not be connected to the cinema development approval. The City acknowledged this but indicated a formal approval of the configuration and location was needed to set the cinema lot and tie in the deferred improvements. t K _ Mr. Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 February 19, 1988 MEETING MINUTES Project Number 87247 page 5 Lot Line Adjustment: Due to lack of meeting time, the specifics of the covenants requested by the City were not discussed. The City did express that their intent is to require a guarantee of continuity of level of finish and features on the entire site (not just this lot) . This would be a condition of a short plat and they are requesting this be provided for this lot line adjustment. RVA noted that it has been their intent to repeat sight features developed on Two and Three Renton Place to develop and maintain neighborhood continuity. Cut sheets of these features (site lighting, benches, tables, bike racks, etc. ) were included in the Approval package. The landscaping types and extent has also been repeated with this goal in mind, employing the same Landscape designer used on the rest of the neighborhood. The City appreciates this intent but is requiring a guarantee of this performance standard. These minutes are an accurate account of the meeting comments to the best of my knowledge. Please contact me if any questions arise or any discrepancies are observed. Brian C. Cloepfil The Callison Partnership be/st93 cc: Those Present The Callison Partnership: Rick King, file 10 February 23, 1988 Mr. Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Village Cinema Expansion Project Number 87247 LOOP LINE ADJUSTMENT (FILE NO. LLA-001-88) Letter of Agreement: As a condition for the City of Renton approval of the Lot Line Adjustment being approved in conjunction with the Renton Village Cinema Expansion project, Renton Village Associates, owners, agree to establish the attached and below listed site features as their property site design standards and to apply said standards to all future development approval submittals on the remainder of the Renton Village property owned by Renton Village Associates: Landscaping (see plant material options attached) Site Lighting (parking and landscaped areas) Landscape benches and tables Landscape waste receptacles Landscape bicycle racks The attached cut sheets of the listed site features are included to establish the intended character, material, construction and approximate size of site features that are acceptable regardless of the manufacturer or vendor. CITY OF R_NTO.1 Q L n H 1/ IS MAR 0 31988 BUILDING/ZONING DEo,- Mr. Donald Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 Renton Village Cinema Expansion Lot Line Adjustment Project Number 87247 February 23, 1988 page 2 Letter of Agreement: (continued) The obligations of this agreement shall be fulfilled and that portion of the agreement terminated upon issuance of Site Plan Approval by the City of Renton for each future project on the property. Renton Village Associates date City of Renton, Building and Zoning date bC/ST122 • • • RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES • RENTON VILLAGE PLANT STANDARDS : .• DECIDUOUS PARKING LOT SHADE TREE 1-1/2 - 1-3/4" caliper/20-25 ft . spacing • * Quercus rubra/Red Oak DECIDUOUS STREET TREE . • 2 - 2-1/2" caliper/30 ft . spacing * Acer rubrum "Red Sunset"/Red Sunset Maple SMALL DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREE AT SITE AND BUILDING ENTRANCES 2-1/2 - 3" caliper/10-20 ft . spacing * Crataegus phaenopyrum/Washington Hawthorn * Cercidiphyllum japonicum/Katsura Tree Prunus yedoensis/Yoshino Flowering Cherry Acer palmatum/Japanese Maple COLUMNAR/UP-RIGHT DECIDUOUS TREE AT BUILDING 1-3/4 - 2" caliper/10-15 ft . spacing • • • Populus tremuloides/Quaking Aspen Betula pendula/European White Birch • • Acer Circinatum/Vine Maple ( 12-14 ft . height clumps) • • • • EVERGREEN TREE PARKING LOT AND SITE SCREEN • 6-7 ft . height/10-15 ft . spacing • * Pinus thunbergiana/Japanese Black Pine • * Pinus contorts/Shore Pine • • • BROADLEAF EVERGREEN SHRUB PARKING LOT SCREEN 24-30" height and spread/4-6 ft . spacing • * Photinia fraseri/Fhotinia DECIDUOUS/EVERGREEN SHRUB MASS AT BUILDING • size and spacing varies • • * Rhododendron species Mahonia species • * Evergreen azalea species Viburnum species * Deciduous azalea species Otto-luyken( laurel • Mugho pine Spires species - • EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER AT STREET FRONTAGE AND BUILDING ENTRY 2-1/4" pots/18" triangular spacing or 1 gallon/3 ft . spacing * Hypericum calycinum/St . Johnswort (at street frontage) * Pachysandra terminalis/Japanese Spurge * Vinca minor/Dwarf Periwinkle Arctostaphylos uva-ursi/Kinnikinnick LOW SHRUB MASS WITHIN PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE ISLANDS 15"-18" height and spread/3-4 ft . triangular spacing .. * Berberis mentorensis/Barberry • SODDED LAWN * NOTE • * indicates plant materials used to provide continuity throughout the Renton Village site. ry • HEIER/VAN DE VANTER GROUP PS Site Design Services - ---- - -• - •• • •,....,....,.,1. ., • .3 i::.; i,....: . r . • '=',.....i , - i: ...1 !,•••i ••• - • . 't, '-14.•t', '..: •• .1. -,4 F.. . .. . .•-•::'‘,-,.. -- 1-..- ., 1 1,....• i. , . , .- • • -• . ‘....: .:--•,. •,..::.: .1 -.. -, - • . •. . • . . • • ::,•••••• i •:•,.,, '-‘i •‘• :,', •-• . • • . . . . . •• • • • • . . . • . ,. .. . , .,,,. • •,,. :• ; , .,-E :,- • . , .• • . ..... . . ...,. . . .. . . • .. . ..... — — . .. .. . • • • '''.:-.' •'. : ••• --•,:i ' . • • -...) • ,, •‘-:.2.. ..•-• . •••• ...,..4 ..: • • . • • • . . . . . . • . . . •" •' i. : . Z. t_.''.' .... : :' • . . . i....•.•• ....::; i'' : -...% ...-..`•.: '. . . • • . . ...•.• :" '. - ' S./ ;.•:'.... :•. , '. . . ' i• • : . i••!.."-.',' i:'• • ; '12..i l•„ • , f.,. ..• .s. r.,,,'••.i': c., si . • t. • , •.. .1 , ' •• • . . .. . • • ' . •• '. • . ,- . . . ..1 • -..,‘,.,. 1 -..........__- _4...j..".:.-7-791r"--itt---- , • .. . .„ . . i • , ; ' , • too . .. ., . . . . ... . .• • 7 . ..,_ . •., •1,t.I. -.11.1... . ! • • • • . - 1 t.'"?......• 1 . -: ''•;.:• Z.!2". F-.3:.-•.'• ' ' ,• : ''' ' - 's•----•-- . .-;-,,.7.--,)"...,-,..-+- '''' • ';'1:--'','s:-:;>:•'.3.''-":'';•.'... .: .......:-.;;- ....z.';'....??..,,...-....• . ,...•• •- '`,-,'41,.... ---. ,. . , , ....„-.-..;d:;ibr :.......,.::J.ir.F.:,...!:::;.,.....i;.-...v.'•,:F•••;.''•••••;••-•;.:•'.•••,:;:.•,4.'$?7•:::•::,..ty',.:•-!•:t:::'.• '.;.'• :• • /.,.,,.'ii.:,ri..:.;:%.:q.,1.,:,.::i:,..;c::;.:,:,..;•:•.:::..4......•........,,....4.•-•.:s,i.4:t.C;sq,•"1,.....'. .":s:. ' 1 t-.. '‘ • • • --7 . ,..e"--s' /-.3;',.-.„...'•":_::v,^'t.'L!,1',•?!.F::;,-1-01';','•:'-.......5.;;N'.':•A''-'''••••'::"-':'.! ;;%-3V,-*r."..t.k::::••••:•t•'. .. . •''s'.' 41-•'*--l•-lc e''13;4 s'k i;::'-•%1P.3•14 Ai-li<t•gfrs‘..:',i'•::'.'s•;,-:-.3:•si.:•‘$.,391A,4;1,30-Alt-,:i s Ts-.-.:-••-. . .,s.....„ .: 'b" ..;-..••.:th-e.,:;•'"...:.,41,,,4..1.7%0,',:.,.v..,,,egg,..Zr*.A,...:;.',•;r.i.U.,•-•;:41 V._,,s-.A.',...V....it`,.‘..•- . ' • ••••"•:' ,.,:. /:•.'r.;••.j.-4...V.,;..r.,,,p,.7.,,,..;e:0,i,:c.a.....;,;t X,/r',,;*,••••••;:-...,-,z.•••-, •:?- i,..:...-....,..-...• - . ..,. ,•!fi.:.:.::::„.;-,,,,.:,-.,..1..,.;.;,4,.-....:.,,-:....).,.„,..1c,.i.,...4-.14.4..,----,,i,,,-,....;;AI,A.-17.-..,,..-i.,,i,...., ... ...u- .,...,..,...„,..,.....,:-...,.........,..„:„...,‘„,....;....,.?,..!..,i.,A..,<!fr.:;-,,,,,-t-../.?...;%,• 0',...' ..: ."..: ' . ••• ' •••-•',.•:"•:•.•••"•••••''''..L.,-••,...,,,:::,i.:.:.:•.•••,q.••••*,,,..t.7.1‘.•%..""!;"••••,... -.:- - • . . •, ,••'..,%..!. Fi;;;.,!..14,filgri:,...f•!..:7A5•4,•;'. ; .,` '9?'..1;a:.1 ir...••:.15';•::. .4;1;;;.;3.1%C:••;.'i."''.7.'•: • . . t'.'•••,:.':...! %'.. . •:‘ !j.:•.: .•': •• .• . .•'•-•:';••:::..;•:C.'',""‘!• •:•••. . . -..;%• :' :''. '•,•,:.....1.•..,:::.....-..:::•'.:c:1,:.:4111.,!,',F..k4...,..11,4 v;.:.•,,....„?..:;,;;.47;;ist:;:r;t:iP.,,r;1 gpr v r b::•••...,•r:. •..3:'-- '.. . -.... .......; 3,:c...-; .-....". \ • . -•-.•-..,..:st's...14:s:••:.•3.11-''',1":•;,••••..r7...".3;31-F3,•1.t•..0 i..7"r-•:0?I't,:ni•t--t,..,•.,-ir-,,,f1.-11.,..• • ••:, . •. . , , - .:-.,•••„: ••••e.v:-t,•.v.l.L.K.1,•,.Z"•,-,:',N,,•---'',.'''.':,,`•/.?.•$:',1,-'...te.•'•''..',.', . .• -. , - .. .. •.. • . - .. • ,, ' . • • .. . . • r...:: ...: : '.: .:.. :': '.. ..'..•:::•••:.•:::.;:,: 6t0:::1f,...-):, .12.,t7,-..rf,..zip. f... ,::.:,.:v..."--,:•:-.:.:....- ... ...- ,..,.......,....,...y...k.....,:•N,V % 4.L.VC."`... ,.10454:gt•Pf.".‘,7:•-". '. • -••• .:,'1:--•...........3:•-.s'•-•i'.•- • :'t----,•-••:... ."'(... .:r...-•:•,••`.%;4'.4:373V-i-,-st-IPit`:;M:•'-'3•11-41.t.fisPii....gl'4'i-fdt,4::'•:•--s-: .. =. r : •'s•s ... •:••ei i'. • • •.•',••:•-.--'..e.:3•.....:,....:-*I'1 f• . •.....•:.-':-.5k...:;;;Vt:•4:ik/A7-1/4•?:;Z-Ver't°•‹.1 -10:igZ'4 A',Vir4-14 Ofro.,,*tr::;t4.--k7''•:.,: • - -••-'"....,•'.-:•-:';‘•'••,-;A•..-.. -:..... ....,..,,,....,....Xou -314 AT 1,1••• `klep 4-de • •lz.t. .......:-.,...!.,•<••••'..,F.>':::'f...-A'..-.- • •••....:•:•.--.....;•.5',7',-,.:_tvtet-,14!.0, ..1,...,a-tf, •i?,-...:tict,„...,,;,..;,...,.4.,;-, t.. ,,.,;;AL,...,.....1,.......,...,.. , . •.......:ix!'f.:!•;",::..i.:•;•.1.;.-..•. •- :.::,...".::*.."--"?."...t!'' 71'6::Iefc-.07:'z'}kl•••.47. :443.1t4.11,:., ,.,t. I. ;',...q.,:z...zy.f,...•...:•./...:•........ ....:..z.'4...6.1.9*.,::"J•• ..-''.•': i. -.,.. fi',,,.V7i-).7k{e4t4=: •*-F5`;111.4„..e.4:trl..4":;' ,..-, *-'4 i •' • 'i :.' ."; "7.7.'... • " 1-- ' :: ' •• ....'-`...•:-•-, '.' ''," -•- '',•. • • s '•• .. -•"' • •• '-'•:•‘'.-.-:.1:••••",..4.c.4.;.. • .,.... ."::-.4.....:447. .,..:,. -.•• -,,..••••••;.,:•11:•1:1;".:IvA"iit:i‘- • • •-•.--...,.,-,..;11-_, ...,.•!..f:s.g..".7-,...%,•:,.• . . •-i•-•-,....-.K,.-..x...;.7„-„,4-6.21?..,,,,,1„,,,.,44',..,,t4.,1,...,46.,.......tio.t.t.„11.6,,,,,,k. ,.........„ ,:t...kii,,,,:el.v.wlis,,,,,,,-ar,.,,,....,.....i...,.i,...,:;:,..,....,, , .........:::.::„: ;':....;'...0,,i'li'.'3:''::.-reVitii.„%'-'4',*&;:fie.tr, %:1:.ttaPi„,t'llle".lif'''';:'•:'-':';•* i ...:*- 1•.:•••z..;•: 1*`...';g..-.,7,4i914,..t,'•tc.-0.:•,.'icif..,..tic4'A"'.,-1',ZIc?..--,f•*k, 14:1,..1.4;;Siii.',....?- , :,., ..1:,.;,..,,.., -.-t• ,--k, , ..,•,......,,,,A- .4,4,,.1,..,?......,,o-.. ...-,„,.......,...• . •........-• ••,:.1?r,..),..i.-...-:;.'6,.•.:,':„..7.,...7-..,;,y-4,-.....i.e.:..4-......,--•„?..4e::-.!...4:4,,....... ye.... •.i,-.,....41v.• ) I::'......'f-.:•.:'••:-.,...;:t.•:'*kfl!ei‘.se,V.414.3',...:‘-'44.0A.}-_ikra"... - •,...els,•*te 11..R.,74:14, • ..:.:.....i-1:•: .,,:',' t.••'i•39.%"4..gek•JOitisii.-.eXt:a;.474i.T.pr.•Te'''7,,,,.1--VtZ,_;,'•A ••••• -•••:,`,1:1 .':.)..**' ..t•ott. .••-•,3051-,-,,,,,,,„;, • s:., • ,. s,e,-4;...._.• • ' ..... I ,..;:s..*.r..; t •••• ; •-.•.1 ,, ••-,•;.•••:i,F,c,:.,-:.: f..: ..,•,,,,!,•:,,,,.;:..0,-.- • --•••••:::::.;:•;:-...., ..;..,::•--4..,.t.,-,-.4-,A-7,0.,..g,rde,-,•••r,4,:•,..:•qb--••• -, 1 .. ... .,,....,... ,.. , ,.A.,.,„%,,„i.,„,•,r, .,•••..tr, ev t . . ••.. . ..„,,,,,..........,.• —,,... •v•—• .,• -, •••, ,,, • — •,,.,-.: k..... •.. '.. •:. • . • . •".4."•.::,‘"!•;'vr;WI. . .Rit7.• •• ..-••,7.......,..:-....-:%:4:- --'''''"4 k...,...,...„ ,..., '... .,••••••.1.",,v..,--• • : . "'!.'i'•",Vi;'•!4`".•'?3„;‘;:'2154tFrt,h:"•,'‘.17,!::; ;•••;.tA;•$;rtIP' •.,• 4'.'f'• •0.;'''.,:it j.:. f 'r .'',..... :"....:-. •14'-.11).•,1•E•.',.. . • :. ..--'....f•i'i:••%:::::':.,!„-r.•,'.:'•.wW,Vt?.'Ye,trAs•il,St2,`• ; tx,ellti••• ''''•,..,1 •,..'''..1 (... ' .'i•.':':'>, . /:,...;:; 1•'' •• ' "-•''''' ,. .. . '''ci..4"...1*, A.a.,..-4,.......;,,.-• •.:?;-:-...;. t•-•.-..... ,,,, ..,........!..., '.,•i,. . ::........••.. ••.,.:....•-'....?:-.'...T.':,::-.;•:-(:•-• •..-4,.-',..,:,:. .,:. ;,...... !....`. ,6 1...,k,,,1., ,,;',..• ' •:,:::'.: ',..':.•'-',•.:•• •. :•''.,-1:1.*:....:•':•••••`,.. .,:•:-.". 4Z4::Zi,.....•::;'' '.; ..:'••,.' -,,,,,4 ,, . . • •••*-•••:;.:!,:•••-:: • 1 .....•..'• , k.,-.:.. :,;':.'•!'.........".2':-.-:-.: '•'.....:.digt ,- ::.,'•.•',',.! :,-,*', .; . l' .,:,.,,,:l •qZ,.''.',:. -• ,,."...':".,: •f:*: .• ., ...• ••••-•L?::;:';'•.'I..'A 1:::41,:riVgrAtT. , " :7,4-4'.:.t%:. . . ' . . :."•.:*'',:i,,..'t,..,...7-?:i)-411,,y1q.:.,.;:e-d.,,Av.-u 4 ..-.4.4 .2.--•',....:4 t ---j. • • •:.:;*.._::•....,•:-,i!*:-,F,N•P:r•-,,•.•,S1';',;ZpiVri.;,;.4.4z 44,44..?1,... ' -,•;.:1.,TiZte.f.iS:7:7:..." i. .. ::::•••.:',:.•:;=';',.;:ci...,1,':°4q:..,,i;44,414-g,,h., ..,0•.- ie • , _ v•.,,,' k,=!..f.i.-4.!•:.'.::;:.:•''. ! V.:'•"1 ,t.-'**-*--; --4.: . 4::,•',1,' ..i• -.- ,'...-'::::.',-.1.--*:'..,..•-:,,,-;-././tyrW-1,4t A,,`"..k**4 : *-..-0.:..-.1.-sif..,;::.• 1 . ir.*::::,:2,....;,:',1‘tk?. ..:::-:,4-',tac.,.;..1;g.--..,... 1`,"cl, • :." • .t, . •A,':•:s:...t..} ... '•-.....!..ctil'... .te3,:s44144.4344;•-.t-••• -- ' ' • }:i.V.i.i..:•;'.. • . - - " .•.--- ,.'i.i...,:•,,is.•:•••;•.•'• •:-',.c.''S••,•,. ..•;;;C,Li'.:4f:•:-.:‘,•C:6.kr./.,*'1,''t.•.., ., ?!;:;(r.;1,4•4• .. .•.N.Ig .•'.!.'8•V;c1f...U.••'.".,..... .....411;4:4*.:•92.k.4.Att4.41:70AZa;frile.ti7/4'4/115,..11.j!r.2.:.,• • . .-..... .. ': ::t?4•.-.)!...., `'.........:;:%.e/24.!›.:V•AilX4: 41,0:. .., . t";..:':.,..., '.......k‘••:....•' t'.' . W. • • •• - ..:1..P1'414....,9.,':•. • ".'....''..."'.. •.,...-..:•.;7•-•'./..':.4•.:,.i.J.....:4:7!).. -44 •-.-.1 . ive:' •••••:3‘•.•• ' ''• ''.•-''' •'•':'••••.'. ••::•,...t.,.:•-'4,•,•••!. ''''''•• •",,,W•iz•z••,,,,'i.•.. , _ ,. e......_ •:...•,,4• • ,......... .,...-,:-..,....,.......r,... ..,,,,,,...--."-.. ......,.:., • .x4.1.:-..: ..,,...,:k,,, ..... • .„,,.....,...,,,,,,a,,.g....1.. . .p,.....::. . - --,/•'1' •.—,-,•••?-1,&•:4:. . . ,:.,—.,.,-, ,..... .,--tod_ ,,,,,,z, , ,i,04,24v „„,-.!.. ......A.._„ ••••.-.':•.,•-•'1'•,,F-4-4',It'ot--- il:'..f-,.y<ii.,,,';.91i,,izigtor,14.,:.;,, ,7-,:•.10;:--44••t?'4•; • ••'''S,;!•-•-•"N•115•••• . . • - •. .=.4c4fisi.,dift,.•Ut'•. • ,‘,.-:1;.* :.,;:'....ti-,;:fi'4,*#.3i,j1,itk.,,_44'4iW;I:1A111 ,_,4.4414401;it.....Z'‘'. . ...• v-1 'Lk •":m•Ii.,..).41V. '1,"'.,il: ...4:41..,(e.. 4!..F..4 •.4, . . ..:54... t.::i,i71,.„,,,,, 4,4,4,..:,:147,310jt.:41,1,,,,,w,,,.....:r „..,,,ill.t.2,..::„..!.5....: , • . ,...,...,.... , . ,... .t • ....,.......,,,, „ ..., .......,.v....„.,„,..., „emir P,....,.. • !...174-t...-.••:•;:'.;•-e'.'-‘1;',.;';,iit .2. • :• :-•k•••,•,"•'&':,t.:4,'"?.? ...:--..d 1 tit".:..t.;;;I'S.,;?.*:4..A•ti .-i>t:'s..4z:-• ..„__;-:, •,........;,..,..L,;;•;w•4',;•.;,..• 7::!•••• ...,v--..-ril',...c,.,....-v,?..%,...,`..r...i....,,;,‘,..',',....• .„,..-4..;,.... •:•.!. :;'.7'41.%-ric1:1=.",:. :,..:-..,1-‘,... '•-, . •• .,,,.t5,7,,..l,:.c.t....„..i.,,.;;..\.:,•!.......,;.'',.r1•••,., ,., :.:"..:'...,..-.-,: . . '1.:':i0t..?i-11:` ' ..'F7%-'1`?.51,:nil•!;:kfl1:-.il.ni;;;M.,:+, • '0,4,i;,,f.''I•cA.,:i.,i,,f-i;',i;,,,'I''..,‘,.,,q4.,,•..(tt:, . • • .:.:....,:•!;„-yr4•2.•-. '..;.'0,'-r t.....1.4.,;.'• -.•.,',A.P:',•;','•.^2F1•4!liCci,f.; *. 'il','-4i'*-•,,•' i..'''.••;.• ••.41,•••,...4-.:,•,••;.1..,., . -.,..;,.::'..,`;'•Y:.:*P;;. ;',.:4-FP-e,:s.-,;4•,..,::,-4'; • .ewr,V.,...-i .•,S "..,',,,,f,qv, '$ . . $4?A'!...;;:t.;h:').',',.:',.g.?,it-,V''.,'-•..:. -4"L:,.':":1•'.V.z..:,:!!'-'''',..'•,':.. i"(,••=-•Ik;'''SV: , e - -- ,',;;,,,,ei..a....,i,•.'?tk, f A:• ses.myr.,................. ..: Vi.tfiraki%1:;)?.?.........•,,:;-•.'' • . :.'.,-:.:;:i''.i*;.;•:.•Tif.1:''',...V"....',1:..f:! 4..:i'*,;,:;•', 0..:-...•,..i: &e.: i..., ,. , ...., / ,., .;•,...,:N:X•7.:.‘'''''• ..,•.p...;...kp-.I.;A,',-;;.. • -.-•:-...../....‘r.••••••f.r-••••4:''..' - -,.f. .,.-/- . • . *.'-*:; :•!:.;`-';'...... • ••••••. ...---•,.r.:1•,....V...:i.i. •••••.',.:44.14. . . . . ••''s,,. .vr,rinttmom..mz...,. . .,..,•• • •...,....s.,.::,:::;,....:.:' •.:,,„-„''',..-•.A..,. i.,,,, , . .;:i!',': ••••••;'...s:4'..9•1:'.+:11.s.tYfiNL--1-M4.1-S'.- -.C..,it-,,,o..,y'• 1.1";.i.tri';•',.)e,'.• ., •.•--1...-•-•.*:.'••.' ••:`17-%'V's .i.....sil.f rit.ek.,•:• ..:•27,7,',A.11,?,..4:7•(.q.:•10'41, .. • . ;•:,..!.... ..,:;:ff„li,.:...,.fiXtil.4.V,T.A..0.1-04.- • t.''';':10',iZX '...11 3 -.,...,....,11".. ,...,.:.,iq..:eti,7,..t.:,..,...7-..;•.- *,•-•Alz"-,."4•,;•,t,.•., : 1,N.'•• - '','•1';':;.;'••• *:'.*;?E-- ,••, -•• i ix,...,•-••••-,-;•r-• ....!,44.-.t'WO--1,.;.,,N.....• • *;::f- V:.,^"VS',ti"f t` .,-`;,.-t,",I,•,,,-. . . . ......t.:•,,rTV,....... i........'(--,...!...s.i-IWIt.;•TYP•I'''cs,t`l•-•,., -,,,,•14,4.,,,,,,,.., :..--,..clte.,t,,AL •- •,,f.'s',.s*.(4'.':,.."•.:34).:,F.,:,z...i ... ...*•,4-::-••::.{:4#41i:41a',: ort,AUF:4::.'.. . •. . 1,/,v.i'l';',1c..,•''.?; ,-;..,, ;:&'"F.,;f4. i)::ffe. ,,,,a,.. •,,,,i: ..... ....... . ..,-.->4.kij,N•i -0•1;:!,• Ix,-0,-, ..?,1', 4Ag.,,,......tt • •;-• . . f•->;..Ni "5C.`V .ii4.•40. ....• ' 5-. .:•4,, .i . .,...:-.• • •,'N',...,,sv'At..„,,,,..?..4.i.. r,......:. .: \,.:*.?,:".,..,,.›.,,•.0...t...• ..'. . ....1,1,...0K,... •.* .,.•. • s - ) , .14;4.104;••.1.;. '• \'' • ' Magg jr...III '..:.5..e — • . - - Mons ...m............—. Explanation of , hotometrics and Pole Spacing Charts C • . . All photometric testing conducted with standard clear All Photometric Testing by acrylic.Footcandle and C.U.correction factors for Independent Testing Laboratories,Boulder,Colorado optional enclosures listed below. BR Bronze tinted acrylic enclosure 0.54 LS Clear Lexan enclosure 0.92 • Whenever single or twin fixtures Whenever single or twin fixtures produce a light pattern that is produce a light pattern that is symmetrical in quadrants,only symmetrical in two halves,only one quadrant is shown,per- one half is reported,permitting mitting maximum size and r-7-(7----n---: \� _ >` �`, maximum size and accuracy for 1 ' accuracy for the charts.These the charts.These fixtures t •f_)_j fixtures include: - include: • Single(Square Distribution). • Single 9 ( 4 ) (21) Si (Asymmetric Distribution) ? Twin(Asymmetric Distribution) For Twin(Asymmetric ._ _J • Opposite aiming. Distribution)with parallel For Twin(Square Distribution) aiming,multiply footcandles multiply footcandles by two. by two.Ref.page 5. Ref.page 5. Pole Spacing Charts for Fixtures with Type V Square Light Distribution For parking lots or general area lighting,it is necessary to determine c both longitudinal and lateral pole spacing.These charts show pole spacings,average maintained levels of illumination and mounting heights within recommended uniformity of 4:1 average to minimum. 150' • The following procedure is suggested: . 1.5 1.Determine level of illumination your area requires in average maintained horizontal footcandles.The I.E.S.handbook may offer some guidelines. If the footcandle levels are too high on a given 20' chart,select a lower wattage lamp that will produce desired illumination level. 100' 2.To determine pole spacings,trace down the desired footcandle curve to any point between the two marks denoting mounting N, 16' height A __ i _ � 3.A whole series of longitudinal and lateral pole spacings are 4 N. available.In the chart at right,combination B 77'x 80', o, — —..._ C _ — 1-10. 16 combination C 93'x 65',or anywhere in between will produce 5 50' 2a 1.5 Footcandles average maintained at 16'mounting height coI , t and 4:1 uniformity. ca 'o I r 1\ Remember,light levels are average maintained,not initial. °7 a 1 a) I al 50' I 1100' 150' -J Longitudinal Pole Spacing Pole Spacing Charts for Pole Spacinga Chart, Fixtures with Type III j W� meet Single Fixture. Width of Street Asymmetric Light Distribution j%j/ j i, Meets 6:1 Uniformity. These charts are direct reading, ; Average to Minimum. giving suggested pole spacings ■ •Pole s for Meets 3:1 Uniformity, I for various mounting heights, One-SideAr Arrangement 'I a Average to Minimum. 2' street or area widths,and Mounting Height 10 12 14' 16' average levels of illumination. Width of Street 10' 15' 18' 20' 25' 10' 15' 18' 20' 25' 15' 18' 20' 25' 30' 18' 20' 25' 30' 35' It is assumed that fixtures will 0.5 � A1erage t 1> be installed on one side of the Maintained 1.0 `69. <82: <78: .68; 825 76 73 65 Sift 71 68 62 56 it Q1 area only. Horizontal 1.5 '64/ 58 %549''46 68'. 59 55 52 '45i' 55 51 49 43 "'3tP 48 46 41 3741 } Footcandles 2.0 57 48 44 41 i35: 51 45 41 39 '347: 41 38 36 32 f29tt 36 34 31 28 VW' Pole Spacing(feet) Pole Spacing(feet) Pole Spacing(feet) Pole Spacing(feet) 1 AC 4 • Warning:This fixture must be 8" Round Drawings grounded in accordance with Specifications local codes or the National Electric Code. Failure to do See page 12 for so may result in serious , photometrics personal injury. • i..'T 4> • 1.G rE • s z y its f(f:- f 5 „ y °, +r7r , } :. „ i y `? �i' o-Yi A° Ti q r T y • f -'� ,� 1r$iyf i Ek • 1 ' f� +ya ,'Z�1 ar�Fr +,C t ts• \\\ P • '. j ? b , ` as r r .4„, r• / 4 SiY G T a L i r.".,;'hi x �L,� • .vy 42r, 1'..'KQ,5 t F r 7F- l-at, t4f,' a ' 4b{t 36„ ti Light Center - Height ffi "i': ;\•.' .. ;;LV:�;":;L;;rg:.,,.:. '"Lid a �,• ..ti,.•�iy.. -•J•ter'-`y, .. :%..,,`.':... -:., 1,- .i Kxt G .-c., ,,.a S I■ I .tom• \FsI .y OGY�F�te�I' = • I !a ::�, .j_; rt• -,S- - +t: .fit Anchor Bolt y.i �`{s 3 " .s::u ", ,}e��..1 Y n,c.,. i ti l.. - s. Projections -If i b• e= ',.,. i� r , v -, o av C.:�v.f -' ^y?Sy'•, 7 i, . +"r:4-1 '.'t. S<,c.•,�� ss k r e, .•':.�.`. .r a : _•;.n� :T w, • 4, Concrete Footing By Others • '.3?t ,:= it '' 8"Dia. - .` t - 41, � 5„ � � Conduit Opening a r ' a ha-,,,' , �• +- Ni c r �. 'mow.•. Dia. Specifications Post Construction—One-piece extruded aluminum,.125" Gasketing—Fixture is fully gasketed for weathertight wall thickness,with heavy cast aluminum twist-lock anchor operation. base concealed within the post. Wiring—Supplied with high temperature socket leads for field Plastic Enclosure—One-piece injection molded,optically connection to the prewired ballast components. clear,100%virgin acrylic,1/4"nominal wall,retained in an unstressed position by internal support through the reflector Ballast—High power factor for —20°F.starting,factory assembly. mounted to the anchor base,and prewired. To Cap—One-pieceAnchor Bolts—Supplied with four 3/8"x 10" + 2"zinc electro- psu heavy gauge spun aluminum,retained plated L hook anchor bolts,each with 2 nuts and washers,and by 2 counter sunk captive socket head fasteners,and braced at the outer edges by the optical assembly.3/4"thick insulation a rigid pressed board template. provided above lamp. Finish—Standard finish is TGIC Polyester Powder-Coat Optical Assembly—Precision hydroformed optical louvers Paint.Optional anodized finishes are available in accordance jwith Architectural Class I specifications,and are applied overwith specular Alzak finish,mounted and removable as a onesatin polish piece self-contained unit. Socket—Porcelain with nickel plated lamp grip screw shell, Certification—All H.I.D.fixtures are Underwriter's rated 600 volts.A special 5KV pulse rated socket will be Laboratories Inc.listed. Photometric data provided by an established and certified independent laboratory. provided for all High Pressure Sodium lamps. 630-4 Kim Lighting Caution: Some interpretations 8" Round Catalog Numbers of the National Electric Code Finishes may allow 120 volt fixtures only. If 208,240,or 277 volt continued Options Ordering Guide fixtures are desired, check (v* . with local code authority before specifying. Fixture Catalog Numbers *Fixture Line Ballast Line Operating Starting Lamp(by others) Cat.No. Volts Type Watts Amps Amps 150W.Incandescent B30-100 120 NA NA NA NA A-21 I.F.2850 lumens 75W.Mercury Vapor, B30-200 120 93 0.82 0.80 coated,E-17 or B-17 B30-201 208 CWA 93 0.48 0.46 3150 lumens B30-202 240 93 0.41 0.40 B30-203 277 93 0.36 0.35 ip100W.Mercury Vapor, B30-205 120 118 1.05 1.00 coated,E-231/2 B30-206 208 CWA 118 0.60 0.58 46001umens B30-207 240 118 0.52 0.50 B30-208 277 118 0.45 0.43 IP70W.High Pressure B30-400 120 88 0.81 0.75 • Sodium,coated, B30-401 208 HX-HPF 88 0.47 0.45 r E-231/z.5985lumens B30-40B30-402 277 88 0.40 0.37 88 0.35 0.35 *Catalog number includes CWA = Constant wattage autotransformer,high complete fixture,ballast, power factor(90%or better) -20°F. anchor bolts and template, starting. and standard finish. HX-HPF = High reactance,high power factor (90%or better) -20°F.starting. CStandard TGIC Polyester Powder-Coat Optional Anodized Finishes s Paint Finishes Included in fixture price. Extra Cost,consult local representative. • Cat.No. Description Cat.No. Description @��E Rla`k BL-A Black pp E Dark Bronze,resembles 313 Duranodic® DB-A Dark Bronze in col NA-E Natural Aluminum • Optional Houseside Shield 160" r c:i ay.•. Extra Cost,consult local representative. Shielding e } :°' °' sr fa:., ; u ;For elimination of back light in unwanted areas such .` 4� as adjacent property,or wherever an asymmetric light �s" ' ''` ` distribution is desired.Constructed of sheet aluminum r .� �� ; covering a 160°arc,and finished to match the fixture. �, p"• Wes 41 .zi `� See page 16 for photometrics. ,, - _y t,, ; i Catalog designation HS ,`ts 7 ..* ' Optional Plastic Enclosures Ordering Guide Extra Cost,consult local representative. Cat.No. Description • Ga,d° er�0\A BR Bronze acrylic equal to Rohm and Haas 2404. ��.�-o`° FjO,S� °`ev LC Clear Lexan®CAUTION-Use only when °Q vandalism is anticipated to be high.Useful life is limited due to yellowing caused by B30-400/BL-A/HS UV from sunlight and H.I.D.lamps. "Alzak"and"Duranodic"are trademarks of Alcoa."Lexan"is a trademark of G.E. Kim Lighting B30-5 . . rai24,r_ ..i.IiIrr7 r. Iwh11ervO!:je bench , series 7. 7 is 't z,- aj. .7-..- { f+ , Fr whistler villageh.■■ = it.. rii.irfi•yi . r11,' -; i 4 4 Xb ', r, y}�i+ f� rrt ti bench �f4. Y ', . r ', :.i• ""' ..i.e.....1 la ,t.� y r. £ DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS r 1 tz , i;, , . , � ' a SY - WOOD: Clear vertical grain red cedar. ' :r a• =F' n'. i os' Y Members are 31h"x3'h" (4x4) with 1/4" 4 . d- r� zr ','d) radius edges and ends. 1 .; , STANDARD FINISH:CCA pressure treated, 1" ' cedar, '• 1 ;,r ` , '" ' 1 1 4:1,: t:. METAL: Mild steel 3/8"x4" precisely fabri- , lye-, .� ": -.�r • "Pr ei^sr Gated to final form. , `;,1 •1, • yet • P ;2,F :.i'i r'(; 'r';+.r,.. .L t .,.ay; STANDARD FINISH: Heavily coated with •r• �' .,.•,s.µ' nor •,,,,.,x powdered polyurethane electrostatically 3 '. ,�•�, `;t,t: �y• 4�" '�`'• t i 'i , 1' r` ..',, ,1 . ,n,to" ...;applied and baked at high temperature t Y, � � ,,, y > �� a.,,. „�. .��,��,,,<<<,„� �,y A �a . to a"mar resistant"finish, fr; ; t) r n�--•'".�i v�'.,, -" `r,"rr,� COLOR CHOICE:Black,Northwest Brown, ' t+,t. •,t ',, �,-`}•, a: "' � 1- '",r: c -7, ""�'re" Midnite Blue. t = r xa --:-- ..--•der, HARDWARE: Large diameter flat flush i=, ;,r,.- re , -A,... . T head bolts with electroplated brass finish x...�, ..,«.u. ••b"•�,*.., "^ ,,` ' '� for all wood attachments. ;�ems;,*z,- ,R i A�i+ 4Y ,,,,,.,..7., .._, s .<< Special vandal-resistant "MAGIC NUT"TM Y used on all fasteners. SIZE: Standard length is 5'10," seating height 17:'Other sizes upon request. BASE DESIGNS:Free standing, inground, "j , . ,: •- surface bolt down. I - •• OPTIONS: Call collect to our main office -: r..°si•r1. for Information on custom woods,finishes, A I . ;r.':-. ,, sizes,and other design modifications. il 1: . 1t,i .' ' Wds. . �. • 7.5 7.51 7.52 sa z :, 0•1'. ,■■■■■ T .,. . I ,,'Ir . ._. — -- - -I 1.-4 1 F —Fv-5„--+1 F-73/4"+7 'H 1_..+8"--I---I 1 Y." I V." 3;4„ 314" 1 /I� • ciak ?. ram r cjaa■ ciao■ 14is■• rII 1. I•t-1.-5"—+p -1 a I—10"—41" I-8"-I-8"4 7"-I Yi..:. '1 • a' • n' TRANCES/A N D R E W INC. . . . • (206)565.5397 . ., •....,,iw:2--.:<, • . •-:.:••• • • • ••• t'•*..---• .:•**:--".•"•'-'-':'.''.,''-•',•••:::;•':•'-• .'''' '''..'•*,•:. .;:!':!: :`..V:•5.-M•;:)?i`Vt '<1s'i;n '3. -"'!•••%'',- -,%.'''i'`•('-'-'••• - .• '•". • , 's'.'• ':'••-' 'i.4..'• • • •'-' • • ' • a .... ::,,.'„, ,:.',,%•:--i,./.;'',"‘,..-.:2.1• 1•,''.:...'2.5•,.,::::--,:-."•',... ' - . • - - • ' -.... . . • • . , .. .....,, . . . ' , • . . ' • .•-• • • • • .. ` -' 3,pix.,:;:r:rp 4.1,11t,416)"-L;!*? ' . . •;.T..' ' : ,'.-1''''"--...,'"- -,..;•.,.`1-,--"-...:..' .,-.-......::-...:'-.•'..•••• •'-• '•• .. - . . ".14s••W.I.i4. .0-t9 lit!)!,.:2 ',1!r-1 1.li414 d % !i-L1'.4,..'• gr •ICI. .. ifiLti2;zli;."‘•44-. .-;•:in.•.,.,).:.4:3:.*X•igt14:k.1.0:.0 • " ..:. :, '- .....'" • •, . :•-...• ;:.",'"....":•;,•••.;.-',.-..;-• '".„.;.....,-.,.;...•••,•••••;•,- ; .- • ' 9 . . • .. :•.•• . . ;',..'.•...• • , , . .., . ... . . , • .. - .,.. ., . ..•••.-* ,. ,,..2 0 a(0 U . . • • - • --, V.:I,'" .1 V 1 N, Li',i • , ( . .. .-: . • t :,-.1x-,.-;11-,.....,Nr.-- _A_\ i 1 s:.ri I k.,!\_:.-t,., ip 0 a it - • . . „ • .. - • .......•: - .;14,(k;;;,f..5Z:ij40.!44;',',..1).!1' . .,R21,:ii!Zfit41,:;.-1g1,g,:,7, • ?.1,f:;:ditv faill.: .i.iliVa'4$1.:.:44%k;,''" .'•--4'-`-'2"--.A-1 -• -,',''' .,4' . . \:,:.;;.„4,,,,,,v.1 •14„,„„,:..,,.,i . ,-„,,,...:. „, ..:,,, 4.4,,4,-.: .4, 4:.‘,..4.4a.a...k, -.,:... •,,,,.(4,,4.4,.:422,Li,r,„,&.4,,4,,,f„..,,),,1:,,„,,,i,,,L„ , ,.41,111,..pr,,,,..b.,- 4.11,x,.w -„•‘-•,-; .144c--,1 .--!,,-7-1..',.... ' 4,ftl''''.°*-•''','"'• .'. 2..-• -• `-% - ..•.:. r i4.'"; ,t,„,r7.-)...";, . •• .:...7. ei;atil .. .:5,14•:.::.0.4.1,41!.,.,..:6 i 11,441 ,jirt',..,t.,,,..:.,:: ••..1....;i1,4.1.4:,F4:1,:,_,:•iy..i.,..'U:....Q.iV,.....tN. , ...• .', !:,:,„I ri, .,, ,.:' : - ' ..1:i.n.i0-110-1!1-%:Liair',1;1)31-;tat:WC1). ,),:ik:: ,$;1•.:-....' 0:45a044DI.f44 .114;;',:?-0-1!.P.;2;1 '14.1V-604.•.-4V. . • • -* . 'if- • .i-1.;-;;IF.,.:1.:1. 1,,,. . • • /1: -...1..-,•• •ifi-67.W1-44 Z444,(1k-4.''..4•ILAr..-5Zat-1.•',* • 441 4.f•Y.' .•:.f.;.:.:::;:%.4-.=. " . RIRMALEr' "-S(4.4r1' •.b^. 1.-'-'...,--"-•': •'••••i .LL.L' - - -• : . r 1 ,..ii./I d r..••‘•",:n1:,•.. .'. i 1: 1-iO4.1U4f.-4.1X1.Vitdal.gQ14,44'.'..!.,'•*- ,.t1.1iXT,1/131attiA-4!ki.,!.:4g:Pk..tAf4,$101,PQ.14.4144.Z - . . sl' '''gk ''. • • -•• . ,:. •• •-• . ' .r.- .•.;;;::`••:••-?..--'-;:' '.. •,6,24,IINI l','61:. .i,.. !,.1.10 .. ,.!-. 4!.. .....1,g., .1.141- P''.-•14.v.i.v.iii .::11i,;.Eiania!iilf.dr.alk•IV4•111:.40..t•,',1t,, • • • ,-,i0L.;;;-* ) "..-'::•,i-.i-4.ii:::-.,?:;',',', ..-..,'"-;:i-.•'.:•••:'-40. 1" .it.ui,Lii1A.,ip;iu,,...-..,,,,•••,.„.,..edt.„,1,.,-..,.,,b-•• -„,i..if,„,!;.).•0 .1).u:.•,,.:ii.-1,”Ji'!„,,i k•i•all.21i'4••.1:'.1f;,4111,V,T.F.41 ,:,,!,l'i, ' ' "i.0 1.-;7•.ft:t•i,.'11.3 v' ...'!'';:•• -i ''-;- ",•::,":'"-2--,.'.'isp, ,i'7,.•i'i r,. .4.-i.ir.7"":";CO"h!lil;f:• 1.;;,f,:;a.Q11;:.tigf.. - • ,..,..;it.tip..,.4d.r.:4:.'t.1.1:•,itz40:141 .., 1,,Igi .1*-4!.;t.:14,1,-;:.1", • . :-.. .7.,•Jili3O i ',D44.,411w •-17.r..":'-i......,.'...,',:-";•',"•--.:r:•giltfi :ii,",,..fl,1.1,, 4,.:',,i- -:..! ,. ,,:kiN.Ii. iv.... ' t!..,..,,iu;.v.,11..tall:-..i4ifr...1.04!..!fp ,,t.a?.,..,;..,2);).;,,v; ..- - '','..-:-; ,,' '. ;.,••:.•-' ,'..,;::::::;::,•-•;,;,.'2,...,•;:..•-':', '.':'(id)'‘,..30,..i4Q.);:„:0_,..;..,..f4j,..,..:..5.,,.-„ii... ,w1„.1,";.,., .. ... '•lg,,.•' ' .'...,' . :: f -'.', *; '.'i ''''''.,''''.,.V:;1 ctilare-',. ,,ii .:iiiv;•‘,.lui....xy,4 ••• i./..: ,-/, ' -;s(a.:*;1!& .):4..''.:-';;•,,4). . .'2;14-4!;;Ii`T•.isi!'&47:1:,-,;•''-';', •414!.4,4:43, ... .,,,..:..N.:!•:,; (*.ff..w,,,,j,: dia,..11.1.11,5 ,:'' 1.-..,1.:,I,,......„.1(0,4:,..,.. itikai4gi.l..,,L.„14. 1.G., .0: ...„,,,,,,p4, 1..t...2„,„,!, • '"•.1.41:.!;1,''.:•• t:Ji..kt+!2,..,1.114i:•:1.•.1..;_1.4,; '.W.:241:'4'..4.:-.';'. y.):44 ••!..,,„4, •-7.11-1•7....,77•7?-.7j-05Ci:TirnW.i'• :`-fi. ;,,-`...••4'...'.•717:=:',.' c::)••••,'".<6 .a"...F;irit.....,:i,'•.IL:.4;:.•,;.L:io.i.0.1 .=., •••U-4.11.0..ftVcl.a!lt.tOLA.;•.:,E110:Lik;i_Mt:r(:114C- La;Lk:k,11...j. : "-•••Itiki • .,Q7,1•A't. .. Li.t.'• .tk' . '' '- • - ,.. .,, -.0, ,,I,....y,c,.„. ,, ...,./,. -...... • :/1' -I:4:4g: 1417:1:Hm-• .---;;,a - .....' ---,.• - • , • ' . . '- ''''' ''Pi I.,(!,".'1:At''lL:'fili,-A21.1017-a-2.`1A.cl!'1--NALA''.- 1!-L11:1,' •t:4--1-'4'' -0`1'.. .- '•..-- ..-,-- ''.‘ ..."-r.': ''.•..-'-'''''''.•,- ..jusAi .lcitio 5r...:":.-- .T.ItiLejy, , --.: ••••:!;1101[•",•i- clil4;'4*V-1114=L'il.1%'• 14-I. ••• -4•"-'.- . L'447I. .--•. • - ',- ••-<- -1'. '• • • &AV ''" ".1''''''f'''::---•''"''1•.'eltI4-021-t'4-1.0'!'-'-I4- • . I..•:-::,,c2 (;!4,,,v.,..&.'41iL... .11.Q2.',1f3114.Y.14r,..'.14.C1. 1a441:Lir*II,I; 14. JIII.'ll<5'01.• 'I- : • • • < --...•.!....7.:••••5'.,•.-;•-•;..,.?„:-•-4--.,.:,....,,,,..-..-,.....-.,- , • . :.1:7;:.....":.:-.•:',":.,...•••...11-:;4:.•'..-.":;V......,..•::•!•:;-..::7'.-2:':7'.•:,.,"••',:'.::'•••:',..`•:,:',. "--:`!"''' • . -. •• • , - . • . .._ .•- . • . . .. , .. •. - •.. , .. . • • •• • • .- . -. . . •..„ . . . ... . _ '::.: • . • •-• . . -• -", • . • . • . .. .- ..-,.. • -• • ,.. ?: . . • • • . -. , , • ....•'.:...•",* •.:.=.'.> ,•-. - - .-. .- * .-- • • • cr--••• - • • • . • . • .-. ._,. .•. .--'- ,.-••,_-2-2,-...,-......-;„•::-.,."..:,-:•,--.:; ; ".. - .• . • . . .. /-•-•,'•_ '.....:,::::::•-;'-......-.":".. :1--; :.:•,...:•,••••• •, •.!'( .....•;...: . •. . . --;--,--7.-::••-•;--,;•;:r-:-:. •• -- . . • ., • . . • 1 . 7-'-' _ __ ,, ..- - • • , .....z..., -......,-..: • " tx) . • •-• 7 '..>:::. 4- r!A°r /-•'-:. :.': . .. , , .. . .. , . • ..7f....1,4.:------.....V. .:: .;;;- -____— „ . . '.... . . ..:''',..; . ... ... .. • .----.. , .-.. .,,,.... , .•......Th. • . ....e.• ...-.......-'- ' . •. ' . . I . '\ . ... .: .. .• . ,. ..:._ . • ,•-• ... . ... . ,- • •- • .. "_..•4:: 5:01;--- ......-.. .......----. — :......_......,..,, ...____ 74 .... , .• • • . , ,.... . .. .•:,••• lit-. I -3-. •;..-- ,,, ,f...... r- .' • . „, . . .. .;7' - ..*:ti:....1 ' . ,J.:-,:,"' • -•:`!•;-":` • ...c. ' '• ..... '"• r ...,' • A.;•.,% ,_ ....„.„ ,kz?i•...i...t. :.A •• .-.-.:•.•••-: • • 4-?' ''' "'" " .,;•72-•,"%:t•••-:•rr- • ' ,...4„.1.••• .. ....,,r,t r ......: .4..„4., rilit. 1 Ir.:: • .:„,,,,.,V•t• . t. • • . ' 404 p,,....‘,:•:. ., ... . -. a . - .,....--,,..., . . , I; • } ..1 . . • . ri ,„. I I ri ,'„i• I \ : ... . . .. - t.• : . • ••• . •. . .. ...• ._ •.• • ... , • . . . - • . . ... , ..• . ... •• •. . . • ,. . ... . . ... . .... .,.. . . . •. .. ..... . .. ., . .. ,.. .. .„. . . . „ , .. • • . • . • • • . .. .. • ,. r, . • .. . ..4...,,• ............ „.• .. . ,. ... ... • . + . , • . /....'"'N . 1.,,. -1.-•"$* . . . . , .. . • • - • • •',` ariiitriV,4,'101i.T.la'414ii,11k! -r,kt.i.if 14- • , • ,•-... c-• . • -: "•• ..... • „ ',,Ty"-V-`,/"Nrie't.e ,.., ... `.'A.1(•)',,, ri . n I-) ,-N -•t•-•-,-inztpul.tifo-WW <jot. -;.!: • - • - •-.;'I.....-u)(!i•z.(gLi!illikitit:_l!..-jui„;4; j„;.... J41 - - 6, • ' "-•i. •. --. '; .- # . # :• : P; 41,4(10,11\i/J1 . : . . •,.. .. 4. . .. tf i --• , iaii„,,lisjoiiiti,r.,,,,!!..,J.4.)40-0.14iiiiiiictilirti,./.1: .„.,. ,, , .,, . . ., ..,,.., :..,....„,k,-..\_, it .. :.. . .,.:.. . . .r..„. ..- ....... .. . •;.,....... ,,..,,,:.,:,_;„,b,:,.Ay, ,•.. ..: . : )..,„,..,., . . • •.., . ..0.).!riti,..Q1110111,P1.7:0J-11134A-JUz, -. • . .-, • - . . . . . . , . • . . .., . „•. . 4-Zi . „ • ,3 ....) • • . . . ' • • • l h l� JJa �,i c ' {�u�!�ll e'ltr ( ' 1Uill1r lat�ua'�J`f tl;l:i. 1 C:+.., 'I• . �� !I,,•.�rll-k�-}}'.,t ti I ,1.1r l''i)Lla Ja/? � '.'1.L..Ll.u.:��-6 E-i a'/E.1.(thifiti ' .c 1�1.iCtu'. bs-?ii �1i t},. W lii 1 lu U Z1 I �'�A' � t i•1 ct T/ � Y it �C�..r�.l..rfJ ti!.•,L-..1..�../.e��..,.i.?L�a; �[ kJ 1. J��J( •J�L�� 1 I !t r �� LI J1F� '11A4iIt,�1ul tU r u ulLil�l Sal °i: Ill)D•W t, .1�J�)itr JjX,I••_.' o:Lid.•._�.i, ., • ,<rt •,iUt il� ��:> +,.l,.c E��itit �(r1-1ii11 rr i!% iCl lrs�tf laT� ,�c• ,+ �I7, J1�[ds �1C :, , • L ,..-,,,-... ,,,,,<.....r::.-_,.,...7:.:.„-,..-:,,,,,..... ,-r.....,-.,..-.;; .,2,-:;..-....,,....;:,,,,.f,...:_-:.5....:: ::.,..f,::,..1z.:.'r'".,•:::,,,-,-,--.?..., .-7:'.-- .!.:;:r .'..;.-•f:?_---..?•.r.:;:.:;,''',-... '''.:'• ':----:-..:•-.`;.:-• ..." '....'' •--,'...' • 1 JI�Fjy I- 1 c^• 4� • �fx-a/�« sl r� f/ s_ �'�� _ ; r 'r1'r nr ram: t:: 1I1i . tki .k 4 / ;� � ma.. r " �j �I: _ y <r / +:�3,} T 1 - � .f ;` t l _t y s Y r i y • • • . rY , ` �� •.• ' • i,. • • / b`�J �I — I I yam; .. i 'O i �'i t ; r7 • '�- .rS .Ca• ./.t,r:llr- :•:: i; { "S+M+'.•. • . nbr •. f L7 x ( lha t1itG,!!�?1t r.w <�• t g e Y • ,x�; �• ( "�1�+iL f-' � r fACl'w 1] • ;,( in�ia"$ 1 t � di"��., • I�. �iJ. ' $ z Ol f 98o OaB, Rr W -.yy r."� •r' • W t, t` V t •4 r y v r Y ,"'r} x • y. j' r 'r r•:f t JC • ... ;,.f 't ) %' nd ' r t / ■ . .. series c, ,_ILL ..Hrecerx ?s • • plant . ash • lifter • senes 8 ,4 .... ^S; ..;rt .` plant • ash ilia` s-- ti'; i' litter 41 ft,,i51 , e sf; ; +k•; f t f + ' zl , DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS ,, ,j�'Y s I :• . f j. WOOD: Wood members are 11h"x21/2" with 15'%yti' ':Ct,; 4:• } I ifiIt i'fIt, .' coved back to mate steel drum and mitered butt - Ji} ' �• I a ,, 1,t ,t + ) , fit sides. Wood members are permanently Iq r t�``, •• l 1' attached to steel drum. 1�!. ! J i4 ' i SIZE:211h"diameter,31"high. ! 4. t,33,11 { j i i • MODEL: t �' 71i„ 1 �.!WI 8.1 Is Trash Receptacle having removable gal- r„' tti , 'i i+°4.n' 'I'''. ! i vanized liner. + i r•' 8.2 is Ash Urn/Trash Receptacle combination •._'r +•,,.; 4 '.1'. t �`�1 l'+ having removable galvanized liner, '•r2` +•' ;F1,1 r i ,I �+! 11 8.31s Ash Urn/Receptacle. ;• I.c.• t' 1, f, + .,s; 8.4 is Planter having 3/1e" formed top trim in '+ , , ' . ji black polyurethane. I j ' 8.5 Is Trash Receptacle with black polyurethane . +• ,l weatherhood for maximum durability and protection. 8.1 TRASH n E r -y ‘, 'II TOP le j _..__., X,t WI{ r ;1 E i E• •r;i•"• 8.2 ASH URN — '''- .�: --- .:-. DRUM I' TRASH COMBINATIONS1 .:. • er,L -7;1°1' a •P'S�"•�..• — "� . '-. • WOOD e 4� '` I , i REMOVABLECLAD I = t 'f,. . -- -- GALVANIZED _ LINER I---1.-9'h"dia. — iri' - ■ / Iles • . nom41111ft / w` 8.3 ASH URN �'" 8.5 WEATHERHOOD •'��, _ -;� �., �' z� c asp rtr x; ..,•..• ,•ck: 0,p' �+ i�,� • • �.4 8.4 PLANTER TOP TRIM { ° •-.. �t d.n i1:.rs -.?°�!y?' }h."•r-t.:�'ra, .4., x 35 FFY'e•';•Vr,,v ors, i1:X';lacr�w,z�y ;."�Yy";1�+^.�•"'r:z';? 4. f • FRANCES/ANDREW INC. : 206 565.5397 fffffffffffffff 1111111111111 11 ' • ORM AND FUNCTION L h. '. may. < C---.Vi •'.J F- ' * -,•tk>0.T.: *-- 2......x;4 7'44 P•q"i 1.:.-. : ; • . • �{"y Y s 1 f �" gc 'w -V ri- fit; • • - W50• 1 . O'% %�({_y�[w¢ _^ e. ' Model RB-9 ' ■■■ r SPECIFICATIONS 'Ribbon Rack'is protected by r ' 0 All units are made from hot-dipped galvanized, registered trademark and ASTM 53 SCHEDULE 40 steel pipe design patent. , (2.375" OD X .154" wall). Delivery time:six weeks from receipt of order. C7 Installation methods are in-ground anchoring or For prices and additional information contact: optional flange mounting. Li Custom architectural finishes are available in a BRANDIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. wide variety of metals (stainless, bronze, etc.). 200 PARK AVENUE, SUITE 303E O The Ribbon Rack is modular; custom models NEW YORK * NY * 10166 are available for any odd number of bicycles. (212)972.0093 ■■■NN■■■■■■■■■■■■M ■■■■■_■ ■■■■..■■■■■■ T Model RB-7 - 1 • 9%".7 . 327/" 35/." - I ' 24.4 cm 83.5 ' 89.5 FLANGE ' MOUNT — / GROUND r LEVEL Model Number No.of Bicycles Rack Length . I RB•5 5 38.375" 97.5 cm 1014" ' RB-7 7 62.375" 158.4 cm IN-GROUND 3„+1 — i126.0 , RB-9 9 86.375" 219.4 cm ANCHOR MOUNT + RB•11 11 110.375" 280.4 cm 7.6 ~ f. 2ie"" 6.0 r .. oprri,ht o opt. 1•:2, :randir International Inc. I 411:0 CITY OF RENTON mil BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director February 8, 1988 Mr. Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership 1423 Third Avenue, #300 Seattle, WA 98101 Re: Renton Village Cinema File No. SA-103-87 Dear Mr. Cloepfil: The Environmental Review Committee has reviewed the application for a Site Plan Approval for the Renton Village Cinema's complex. The Committee recommended that the decision regarding threshold determination for this project be deferred pending the receipt of additional information concerning: 1. Drainage -- Provision of storm drainage systems, as well as applicant's participation in the City of Renton's storm drainage project for this area; 2. Pedestrian circulation -- Linkage to public transit routes, parking and waiting areas, and to other structures on the large site (e.g. , Evergreen Building, Sheraton Hotel, etc. ) . 3 . Layout and design of parking areas and vehicle circulation patterns. 4 . Area calculations on existing open space, areas to be lost and areas of replacement. 5. Noise mitigation, particularly as it relates to public open space areas. 6. Aesthetics to visible roof areas and their articulation particularly as it relates to visibility of the proposed use from the freeway, whether the architectural response is compatible with the design of existing office buildings; and 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Mr. Brian Cloepfil February 8, 1988 Page Two 7. Alternatives to the proposed action that will be looked at,if any. We would be pleased to discuss the recommendations from the Technical Staff Review Committee. Please call our office at 235-2550 to set up an appointment with me or Jerry Lind, of my staff. Sincerely,C:1114 l 1 a Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/adk RenVilCin:a:clpflltr BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT February 3, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Renton Village Cinema PROJECT: Renton Village Cinema ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-090-87, SA-103-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. B. ISSUES: 1. Whether the applicant has provided storm drainage systems which offer adequate capacity and sufficient separation of oil/water to satisfactorily serve this site. The site is fully developed at the present time, with a storm drainage system in place. However, the new development will alter the amount of impervious surface impervious surface increasing it from 75% to 77% of the property, and will change the grade. As a result, the Engineering Department has indicated that additional drainage capacity will be required. The location/type of drainage system will be coordinated with the setting of structures and of aprking areas. Increased traffic to be generated by the expansion of the cinemas may be expected to create more oily residue on the site. Oil/water separators should be installed to contain oil residue the site where it can be periodically collected and properly disposed of. 2. Whether the applicant should be required to construct sidewalks adjacent to the Cinema complex, on the south side of S.W Grady Way? ` Building and Zoning Department Environmental Review C Littee Staff Report Renton Village Cinema February 3 , 1988 Page 2 The Uniform Building Code and the Renton Subdivision Code require off- site improvements, including, but not limited to "sidewalks, curbs, gutters and street paving. . . (extending the) full distance of such property to be improved upon" for improvements to commercial structures of more than $25, 000. 00 to commercial structures. The subject property is fully improved along Talbot Avenue. However, additional improvements may be necessary to accommodate increased pedistrain traffic generated by Cinema ptrons. The perimeter along S.W. Grady Way includes curbs, gutters and street paving. Under the applicable regulations, the applicant (owner of the entire Renton Village site) will be required to install six foot wide sidewalks, to APWA standards, along the length of S.W. Grady Way adjacent to the site. Additional crosswalks may also be required across Grady Way to accommodate users of public transit. 3. Whether sufficient information is provided to determine traffic impacts from this project and to establish the necessity for on-site mitigation systems and/or desirable levels of contribution to benefit traffic district assessment funds? While it is acknowledged that the proposed use will have less impact upon area traffic than many of the allowable commercial uses for the property, the potential exists for traffic flow difficulties at this site. ' Of particular concern is ingress/egress at Grady Way. In order to better determine the on-site impacts of the expanded Cinema, and to determine specific benefit district assessments for new increased daily trips, more information is needed from traffic analysis. Present studies only provide information about peak hour trips (4: 00-5:00 p.m. ) and 8:30 - 9:30 p.m. trips. An analysis should be submitted measuring the number of new trips generated daily by the expanded project. 4. Whether sufficient provisions have been made for maintaining the area -adjacent to the construction site free from debris during demolition and building of the project? This is necessary to properly address traffic mitigation. ' Building and Zoning Department Environmental Review C ittee Staff Report Renton Village Cinema February 3, 1988 Page 3 On-site debris will be created during the demolition/construction process. Facilities should be provided on site to wash down truck tires to prevent tracking of debris from the site to adjacent roadways. 5. Whether sufficient measures have been taken to provide aesthetic amenities (e.g. landscaping, open spaces, recreational opportunities) on site adjacent to the Cinema? Landscaping/open space developments which are centrally sited on this property at the present time are planned for relocation toward the periphery (adjacent to the I-405 corridor) . Parking spaces are planned for the vacated area. Parking spaces and landscaped areas proposed by the applicant do meet minimum requirements established by regulation. However the submitted plan lacks a number of characteristics which would make the site attractive and convenient for Cinema patrons and for other users over the life of the structure. The applicant should meet with City staff including the landscape planner and representatives of the Parks and Recreation Department to consider revision of plans for open space areas, pedestrain access to and through the property, landscaping and for parking waiting areas (e.g. , siting, accessibility, amenities, noise mitigation) . Revised plans should address improved aesthetics and safety. To further ensure the availability of adequate parking for this project, the applicant should execute a joint use agreement with One Renton Place. 6. Given the high visibility of the site from adjacent buildings and I-405 whether sufficient measures have been taken to ensure the sightliness of the complex, particularly in terms of: * Roof top screeing. * Architectual integration of signage * Night-time illumination and efforts to reduce visual glare. . Building and Zoning Department Environmental Review C " ittee Staff Report Renton Village Cinema February 3, 1988 Page 4 C RECOMMENDATIONS: Defer making a threshold determination pending the provisions of additional information in the following areas: 1. Drainage 2. Pedestrain circulation 3 . Parking 4. Vehicle circulation 5. Loss of open space 6. Noise 7. Aesthetic impacts and 8. Alternatives to the proposed action. D.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Reviewer made the following comment: Truck tire wash down for tracking avoidance during any open soil phase. Fire Prevention Bureau: Reviewer made the following comments: 1. Provide adequate water flow for Fire Department. 2. Building to be sprinklered through- out. 3. Provide Fire Department access throughout construction. 4. Combustible structural members not to be used inside the building until water system approved by the City. 5. Building to meet all fire, life safety codes adopted by the City. Design Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Provide additional drainage capacity across back parking lot. 2. Provide minimum 1500 gallon oil/water separator for storm drainage system. 3. Provide sidewalk improvements on Grady Way frontage. Traffic Enctineerinq: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Developer should agree to participate in South/Southwest Grady benefit district at $197. 00 per average increased daily trip generated.. BUiltling and Zoning Department Environmental Review CI ittee Staff Report Renton Village Cinema February 3, 1988 Page 5 2 . More information is needed from the traffic analysis as to what the average increased daily trip would be when generated. Present analysis only gives average peak hour trip 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. and 8:30 to 9:30 p.m. $197 X average new increased daily trips = $ benefit district assessment. Utility Engineering: Parks and Recreation: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. The proposed project as presented will have major negative recreation and aesthetic environmental impacts. A relatively large but poorly designed and, therefore, under- utilized centrally located open space is being eliminated and replaced by a much smaller non-centrally located open space closer to Renton's major noise generator, I-405. The proposed open space area will primarily serve users of the Evergreen Building while the existing poorly designed open space has the potential to not only serve users of the Evergreen Building, but users of other Renton Village facilities as well. The area surrounding the existing open space is under landscaped and will be even more so if it is converted to parking. Nothing has been ' proposed for the remaining triangular open space that is outside the project boundary. It is already next to useless, and if the proposed project is approved as presented, there will be no doubt about its lack of value. 2. See attachment for additional comments. Building Division: Zoning Division: Policy Development: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. The checklist mentions a lot line adjustment as part of this request. However, a lot line adjustment is not shown on the site plan. 2 . Approval of this project should be contingent upon the execution of a joint use parking agreement between the Cinema and One Renton Place. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 10:00 A.M. Renton Municipal Building February 3, 1988 3rd Floor Conference Room MINUTES ATTENDING: Ron Nelson, Chairman; Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator; Larry Springer, Policy Development Director; Dick Houghton, Public Works Director; Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant; Jeanette Samek-Mckague, Senior Planner; John Adamson, Program Development Coordinator; Carolyn Sundvall, Recording Secretary. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the Chairman. 2. CONTINUED PROJECTS: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY - ARCO AM/PM MINI MART Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an AM/PM Mini Mart with gasoline sales. The project will include the construction of a 2,480 sq.ft. building with a 30'x 53' canopy with two split 32' pump islands for gasoline sales, with three 12,000 gallon double containment underground storage tanks. Site includes 13 parking stalls, landscaping and two free-standing signs. Property located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue Northeast. (ECF-056-87; CU- 065-87) • Donald Erickson gave background information on the project and he reviewed the staff report with the Committee. Springer suggested a letter of appreciation to the applicant on the joint access and the "Welcome To Renton" sign. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance with the 7 conditions listed on the Staff Report with the exception of condition 5 which should be deleted. However, Condition 5 should not be deleted on the north parcel. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. THE VYZIS COMPANY Application for special permit for fill and grading permit to allow the filling of approximately 14,300 cubic yards of material on 20.9 acres of property. Note: Site was previously filled with permit No. SP-134-78. Property located on the west side of Lind Avenue S.W. between the 1900 and 2300 block. (ECF-088-87; SP-102-87) Don Erickson gave background information on the project. He stated that originally the Committee had issued a Determination of Non Ssignificance - Mitigated on this project, but after a meeting regarding the P-1 Channel a decision was made to issue a Determination of Signifiance. In light of new information, from the Department of Ecology, it was determined that there would be an impact on the flood insurance program and the storm water drainage system. It would also violate City and Federal Ordinance and City Policy. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to reconsider the Declaration of Non- Significance, Mitigated issued on both Vyzis and Alaska Distributors. Seconded by Ron Nelson. Carried. Mike Parness will set up a meeting for Wednesday, February 10, 1988 to include Larry Warren, Ron Nelson, Don Erickson, Mike Parness, Larry Springer and Dick Houghton to discuss the project further. GREENWOOD CEMETERY GRAVEL PIT (SERVICE CORP. OF AMERICA) Application for special permit for fill and grade permit to allow extension of existing permit (SP-048-85) which will allow completion of fill operations and restoration of site. The work is to include 142,000 cu. yd. of removal and 295, cu. yd. of fill. (ECF-066- 87; SP-076-87) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated that after reviewing the project a number of things came up that was not apparent before. He referred to a letter dated March 27, 1987 from Rittenhouse-Zeman & Associates, Geotechnical Consultants. Issues raised were: 1. Large chunks of concrete put into the pit along with wood waste. 2. Optimum moisture content, which presents a stability problem. 3. Quality of fill material. He stated that the applicant should submit a program for rehabilitation to the existing drainage system. Hours of operation will be 8:00 - 4:00, Monday through Friday; Environmental Review Co itee Minutes February 3, 1988 PAGE 2 DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. 3. NEW PROJECTS: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema with 20,000 sq. ft. and 1.405 seats. It is to operate as an an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. It is located in the Renton Village Complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF -090-87; SA-103-87) Don Erickson gave background information. He stated the new building will be double the size of what is presently on the site. He referred to the issues on the Staff Report and stated that areas of concern were: egress and ingress, drainage, aesthetics, pedestrian circulation from the parking area and landscaping. These areas had not been addressed by the applicant. DECISION: Ron Nelson made a motion to defer action until the issues have been answered, seconded by Larry Springer. Carried. McDONALDS CORPORATION Application for administrative site plan approval to construct a 3,951 sq. ft., single story restaurant located on the south side of N. E. 44th Street and east of I-405. (SA-107-87) Don Erickson gave background information on the project and reviewed the issues on the Staff Report. Discussion took place on the site plan. Committee expressed concern on circulation. Ron Nelson asked that signage be addressed with the applicant. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to issue a Declaration of Non-Significance - Mitigated with the 7 conditions listed on the staff report Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. CITY OF RENTON - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Application for a Local Improvement District for Street and Utility Improvements on N. E. 44th Street. Improvements include street and utility, street widening, new sanitary, water, and storm improvements and new traffic signal at I-405 on/off ramp. (ECF-100- 87) Don Erickson gave background information on the project. The Committee reviewed the conditions listed on the Staff Report and discussion took place. Dick Houghton told the Committee that the State had verbally agreed to design the widening of the overcrossing at 44th at their cost. Larry Springer stated that conditions 2 and 3, on the staff report had already taken care of. He suggested that condition Number 4, dealing with annexation petitions, be dropped. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to hold the project until questions on vehicle circulation, landscaping and bicycle trails, were answered. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. CITY OF RENTON - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Renton Avenue South and West Hill Sewer Replacement - Includes replacement of the small, existing sanitary sewers with new 8" and 10" sewers. (ECF-101-87) After giving the Committee background information, issues from the Staff Report were reviewed. The Committee felt that the application was not clear and that it lacked an appropriate description of the proposed action. The map was also in error. DECISION: Larry Springer made a motion to defer action until more information was available. Ron Nelson seconded the motion. Carried. 4. ADJOURNMENT; The meeting was adjourned at 12:30 p.m. BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT J , ENV IRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT , February 3, 1988 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Renton Village Cinema PROJECT: Renton Village Cinema ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-090-87, SA-103-87 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20, 000 sq. ft. and 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2, 260 seats. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Located in the Renton Village complex at 25 South Grady Way. B. ISSUES: 1. Whether the applicant has provided storm drainage systems which offer adequate capacity and sufficient separation of oil/water to satisfactorily serve this site. The site is fully developed at the present time, with a storm drainage system in place. However, the new development will alter the amount of impervious surface impervious surface increasing it from 75% to 77% of the property, and will change the grade. As a result, the Engineering Department has indicated that additional drainage capacity will be required. The location/type of drainage system will be coordinated with the setting of structures and of aprking areas. Increased traffic to be generated by the expansion of the cinemas may be expected to create more oily residue on the site. Oil/water separators should be installed to contain oil residue the site where it can be periodically collected and properly disposed of. 2. Whether the applicant should be required to construct sidewalks adjacent to the Cinema complex, on the south side of S.W Grady Way? Building and Zoning Dep ment Environmental Review Coy _ttee Staff Report Renton Village Cinema February 3 , 1988 Page 2 The Uniform Building Code and the Renton Subdivision Code require off- site improvements, including, but not limited to "sidewalks, curbs, gutters and street paving. . . (extending the) full distance of such property to be improved upon" for improvements to commercial structures of more than $25, 000. 00 to commercial structures. The subject property is fully improved along Talbot Avenue. However, additional improvements may be necessary to accommodate increased pedistrain traffic generated by Cinema ptrons. The perimeter along S.W. Grady Way includes curbs, gutters and street paving. Under the applicable regulations, the applicant (owner of the entire Renton Village site) will be required to install six foot wide sidewalks, to APWA standards, along the length of S.W. Grady Way adjacent to the site. Additional crosswalks may also be required across Grady Way to accommodate users of public transit. 3 . Whether sufficient information is provided to determine traffic impacts from this project and to establish the necessity for on-site mitigation systems and/or desirable levels of contribution to benefit traffic district assessment funds? While it is acknowledged that .the proposed use will have less impact upon area traffic than many of the allowable commercial uses for the property, the potential exists for traffic flow difficulties at this site. Of particular concern is ingress/egress at Grady Way. In order to better determine the on-site impacts of the expanded Cinema, and to determine specific benefit district assessments for new increased daily trips, more information is needed from traffic analysis. Present studies only provide information about peak hour trips (4: 00-5: 00 p.m. ) and 8 : 30 - 9: 30 p.m. trips. An analysis should be submitted measuring the number of new trips generated daily by the expanded project. 4.• Whether sufficient provisions have been made for maintaining the area adjacent to the construction site free from debris during demolition and building of the project? This is necessary to properly address traffic mitigation. Building and Zoning DeI---tment Environmental Review Cc ittee Staff Report Renton Village Cinema February 3 , 1988 Page 3 On-site debris will be created during the demolition/construction process. Facilities should be provided on site to wash down truck tires to prevent tracking of debris from the site to adjacent roadways. 5. Whether sufficient measures have been taken to provide aesthetic amenities (e.g. landscaping, open spaces, recreational opportunities) on site adjacent to the Cinema? Landscaping/open space developments which are centrally sited on this property at the present time are planned for relocation toward the periphery (adjacent to the I-405 corridor) . Parking spaces are planned for the vacated area. Parking spaces and landscaped areas proposed by the applicant do meet minimum requirements established by regulation. However the submitted plan lacks a number of characteristics which would make the site attractive and convenient for Cinema patrons and for other users over the life of the structure. The applicant should meet with City staff including the landscape planner and representatives of the Parks and Recreation Department to consider revision of plans for open space areas, pedestrain access to and through the property, landscaping and for parking waiting areas (e.g. , siting, accessibility, amenities, noise mitigation) . Revised plans should address improved aesthetics and safety. To further ensure the availability of adequate parking for this project, the applicant should execute a joint use agreement with One Renton Place. 6. Given the high visibility of the site from adjacent buildings and I-405 whether sufficient measures have been taken to ensure the sightliness of the complex, particularly in terms of: * Roof top screeing. * Architectual integration of signage * Night-time illumination and efforts to reduce visual glare. Building and Zoning De] tment Environmental Review CL ittee Staff Report Renton Village Cinema February 3 , 1988 Page 4 C RECOMMENDATIONS: Defer making a threshold determination pending the provisions of additional information in the following areas: 1. Drainage 2 . Pedestrain circulation 3 . Parking 4. Vehicle circulation 5. Loss of open space 6. Noise 7. Aesthetic impacts and 8 . Alternatives to the proposed action. D.COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Reviewer made the following comment: Truck tire wash down for tracking avoidance during any open soil phase. Fire Prevention Bureau: Reviewer made the following comments: 1. Provide adequate water flow for Fire Department. 2 . Building to be sprinklered through- out. 3 . Provide Fire Department access throughout construction. 4. Combustible structural members not to be used inside the building until water system approved by the City. 5. Building to meet all fire, life safety codes adopted by the City. Design Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Provide additional drainage capacity across back parking lot. 2 . Provide minimum 1500 gallon oil/water separator for storm drainage system. 3 . Provide sidewalk improvements on Grady Way frontage. Traffic Engineering: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. Developer should agree to participate in South/Southwest Grady benefit district at $197. 00 per average increased daily trip generated. Building and Zoning Dep :ment Environmental Review Cc_ Lttee Staff Report Renton Village Cinema February 3 , 1988 Page 5 2 . More information is needed from the traffic analysis as to what the average increased daily trip would be when generated. Present analysis only gives average peak hour trip 4: 00 to 5:00 p.m. and 8: 30 to 9:30 p.m. $197 X average new increased daily trips = $ benefit district assessment. Utility Engineering: Parks and Recreation: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. The proposed project as presented will have major negative recreation and aesthetic environmental impacts. A relatively large but poorly designed and, therefore, under- utilized centrally located open space is being eliminated and replaced by a much smaller non-centrally located open space closer to Renton's major noise generator, I-405. The proposed open space area will primarily serve users of the Evergreen Building while the existing poorly designed open space has the potential to not only serve users of the Evergreen Building, but users . of other Renton Village facilities as well. The area surrounding the existing open space is under landscaped and will be even more so if it is converted to parking. Nothing has been proposed for the remaining triangular open space that is outside the project boundary. It is already next to useless, and if the proposed project is approved as presented, there will be no doubt about its lack of value. 2 . See attachment for additional comments. Building Division: Zoning Division: Policy Development: The reviewer made the following comments: 1. The checklist mentions a lot line adjustment as part of this request. However, a lot line adjustment is not shown on the site plan. 2 . Approval of this project should be' contingent upon the execution of a joint use parking agreement between the Cinema and One Renton Place. z ,y/ ji ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA January 27, 1988 c , Third Floor Conference Room Commencing at at 10:00 a.m. CONTINUED: ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY - ARCO AM/PM MINI MART Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an AM/PM Mini Mart with gasoline sales. The project will include the construction of a 2,480 sq. ft. building with a 30'x 53 ' canopy with two split 32 ' pump islands for gasoline sales, with three 12, 000 gallon double containment underground storage tanks. Site includes 13 parking stalls, landscaping and two free-standing signs. Property located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue Northeast. (ECF-056-87; CU-065-87) NEW PROJECTS: ,.RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema with 20,000 sq. ft. and 1.405 seats. It is to operate as an an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 sq. ft. and 2,260 seats. It is located in the Renton Village Complex at 25 South Grady Way. (ECF - 090-87; SA-103-87) McDONALDS CORPORATION Application for administrative site plan approval to construct a 3,951 sq. ft. , single story restaurant located on the so h side of N. E. 44th Street and east of I-405. /67-5>7 c /1 - 0O `/'- IF7 CITY OF RENTON - P LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Application for a Local Improvement District for Street and Utility Improvements on N. E. 44th Street. Improvements include street and utility, street widening, new sanitary, water, and storm improvements and new traffic signal at I- 405 on/off ramp. (ECF-100-87) CITY OF RENTON - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Renton Avenue South and West Hill Sewer Replacement - Includes replacement of the small, existing sanitary sewers with new 8" and 10" sewers. (ECF-101-87) ETAC DISC:A:ETAVADG I v�s R 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L� \A.0 DATE CIRCULATED: DECEM ER 17, 190 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 31, 1987 EFC - 090 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PIAN APPROVAI TO AII,OW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT ' IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: CM( OF R NTo:1 l(P1 0 riEc BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additiona information is needed to properly assess this proposal. /$-7 ? nature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Forn, A ). -1;1* RENT( BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT : RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION OTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 1::] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT �. ETBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT fl POLICE DEPARTMENT LI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LI OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON nOrT MRRR 11 , l QR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : e APPROVED ElAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Co C. , �cL �c.5 i 'Oa J� I -r' � 9�C DATE: / -7/ SIGMA F DIRECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N E,.. AONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEL. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 YzA DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 31 , 1987 EFC - 090 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PI AN APPRUVAI Tn AIIOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals v— 6) Energy and Natural Resources �-- 7) Environmental Health 1/ 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation • 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation • 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: Developer should agree to participate in South/Southwest Grady benefit district at $197.00 per average increased daily trip generated. More information is needed from the traffic analysis as to what the average increased daily trip would be when generated. Present analysis only gives average peak hour trip 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. and 8:30 to 9:30 p.m. $197 x average new increased daily trips = $ benefit district assessment E \11 7,) 41061 t t� DEC igS7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dir 'r or Authorized Representative Date r''' 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEN ^ --WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 090 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO: OPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION ETRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU fl PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT EIBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY ,5: 00 P .M. ON 1-)1C1 MRF.R 11 i aA-t REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISI 'N : OAPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED Developer should agree to participate in South/Southwest Grady benefit district at $197.00 per average increased daily trip generated. More information is needed from the traffic analysis as to what the average increased daily trip would be when generated. Present analysis only gives average peak hour trip 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. and 8:30 to 9:30 p.m. ' $197 x average new increased daily trips = $ benefit distric assessment (r, � ram DATE : a8 /`7 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR' AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 REVISION 5/1982 : 2918.8 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE. D!�' d '�' rya'. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �v, kn��ri vc, GU!'-D!,ti!rlZON NG DEPT. DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 31, 1987 EFC - 090 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PIAN APPRUVAI Tn AILOW THE EXPANSION OF. AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT • IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use c/ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: .4/ • C.. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signatur o Director r Authorized Representative Date Form 4 RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPi MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES • PROJECT TITLE : RENTON.VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : EENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON n f''FMRF.R -41 1 QR7 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Y".... IDAPPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIO•N.W EINOT APPROVED SJ she DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 . 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,�" DECE1BER 17, 1987 SDUE: DECEMBER CIRCULATED: COMMENT D CEMBER 31 , 1987 EFC - 090 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 �EC� 7A- ��^-. PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES �- W 4,, PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PLAN APPROVAI TO AllOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & .1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX Al 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. - 1\ C61 Signature of Director or uthorized Representative Date R TON BUILDING & ZONING D ARTIMENT • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT : RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON.VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36 253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION E FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING .. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON n (`F.MRF.R 11 1 cR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : tsR LI APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS pi APPROVED c), yi\mAk c)A69 -8-"('4„4a qjtjut- teA tth .61/4* pl(? ti4 r* , imuttacifY\ con641 Aksitx 104 j3N- 1)-1;guil (Aaltkl kalk, )) W6itikt. „ ., DATE: 0, -I\'CS1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 0 i i _ p441,144404), ai,_-,i: ...- ',,"_ u Rr ? ( U FIR( FLOW Cl1LC! ATInNS 1. HAZARD IDE TIP CAT! I ORMAT I ON -3 NAME e i ® ,O, / I� U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS b'a��F. t i J ✓i ) , 1/ 4st e ® FIRE MGMT AREA • 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CI CLE_ I •- 11 _� IV �I III \ FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARYV (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INST WOOD BASICFS L MIXED AREA. AND FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A) NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: .3?,j? 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE al, USING AREA CA): 3600 �� 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: ,— GPM (C) 6 GPM -- IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF CB): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) CC) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C); CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) (2i2 C" Z GPM (Di- n DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT:. ADJUSTMENT: /3/P✓-5.-7- CIF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF CD): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY M CE) AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE. ADJUSTMENT•: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE. BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION Matt. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT.. ADJ. 0 - 10 . 25% MAX. 11 - 30 25%0% MAX. NORTH �� ADD = 8 11 - 60EAST ADD t/ % 61 -100 15% MAX. WESTSEJ11H 0 i ADD ADD �% 101 -150 10% MAX. �y'1 � % 1501 OR-1 4-NR WALL 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : o2® % (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES CD) ADJUSTMENT: • m�� I. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT GPM CF) CIF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD'500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: I. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: GPM CG) CIF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) /�� 7 CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,O.10 GPM) (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED IRE FLOW: g9®d 0 GPM CFI) SIGNED: , • j �° -44 t.aTE f02 `�c,g5 7 • , J d d 2149N - E.,: RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE_ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 9vrk , c= v DECEMBER 17, 1987 COMMENTS I, •• r,T DATE CIRCULATED. �- �',� ; • � � ' EFC - 090 _ 87 i c • APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 OE O 81907' PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: RENTON' VILLAGE CINEMA BUILDING/ZONING DEFT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PIAN APPROVAI Ti) AIlOW THE EXPANSION OF. AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT ' IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics X 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ( 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: The proposed project as presented will have major negative recreation and aesthetic environmental impacts'. A relatively large but poorly designed and therefore, under- utilized centrally located open space is being eliminated and replaced by a much smaller non-centrally located open space closer to Renton's major noise generator, 1-405. The proposed open space area will primarily serve users of the Evergreen. Building while the existing poorly designed open space has the potential to not only serve users of the Evergreen Building, but users of other Renton Village facilities as well. The area surrounding the existing open space is under-landscaped and will be even more so if it is converted to parking. Nothing has been proposed for the remaining triangular open space that is outside the project boundary. It is already next to useless and if the proposed project is approved as presented there will be no doubt about its lack of value. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information 's needed to properly assess this proposal. ,, At/V/097 Signat� o Director or Authorized Representative Date Form 4 Y J RENT-", BUILDING & ZONING DEPI 'MENT A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 09° - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : '• RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : OENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU SPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON 111C'F.MRF.R 1 QR7 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; if /Qeeresf%d4 El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED roe J#d4te7" 4 .06.04.064. 06.0✓ I4' DATE: /2/•f/r SIGN? OF DIRECTLiR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/19.82 • After a careful review of the plans and a site visit, the following comments are offered for consideration: On the positive side the proposed open space will serve to integrate the Ever- green Building and the new cinema complex. It will be fairly accessible to users of the Evergreen Building and it will offer more visually pleasing views to the south than does the current open space. On the negative side there are several important factors that make the proposed open space a poor choice. 1 . It is smaller. Approximately one-third the size of the existing open space. 2. It is closer to 1-405 and Rainier Avenue off-ramp noise. The on- site visit confirmed the consultants' contention that. . . ."The noise difference of five to six decibels between the two sites is significant." For the record it should be noted that traffic noise is a major consideration for park location. Attachment #16 states that " the current location of several of the major city parks with similar adjacencies to 1-405 suggest that traffic noise is not the major consideration in public outdoor space location. Liberty Park has been in its present location since 1914 and Cedar River Park also predates 1-405. Because these parks are so close to 1-405 they have taken on a primarily active recreation character." 3. It cannot become an overall site focal point because of its location at the rear of the site and between the two buildings. 4. It does not adequately take advantage of the existing site amenities such as the trees, water and lower elevation, which, if properly utilized, could mitigate to some extent the 1-405 noise factor. 5. The proposed site is not adequately buffered with trees and other landscaping. 6. It leaves the most poorly designed existing public open space untouched. Because of the above negative factors the proposed open space plan is not acceptable. The existing open space is certainly not without its problems. Overall poor design and maintenance are the major reasons this space is under-utilized. Specifically the following design and maintenance issues have been identified: 1 . The site has trees but no grass or ground cover. Bark has been used throughout and it makes the site appear and feel barren. 2. It has a modest physical pedestrian connection to the Evergreen Building. 3. The seating area has benches that are too long for the small and potential intimate area they enclose. They would be more suitable in a train station. -1- / „ L 4. The focal point of this dubiously designed seating area is a single tree which in a way epitomizes the lack of creative landscape treatment that makes this site such a disaster. 5. The space is basically an isolated island with no meaningful connections to its surroundings. Having catalogued the sites' deficiencies does not mean it is without potential value. On the contrary the site is extremely valuable for the following reasons: 1 . The site is midway between Grady Way and 1-405 thus the noise impacts from those two major traffic corridors are less a factor than if the site was. located adjacent to either corridor. 2. Even though it is under power lines they are not a negative factor in the site experience. 3. The space is large enough to incorporate a variety of landscape and passive recreation features. 4. The space could be designed in such a way that it would not only integrate the cinema complex and the Evergreen Building but the Ernst Hardware Store as well. Further, it could be a focal point from the Lake Street entrance and because of its central location it could become a Central Park as the sites north of it develop with more intensive uses in the future. 6. The site has the potential to become a lush oasis amidst a desert of under-landscaped asphalt parking lots. -2 1 ; I 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: \T) c ue l( ►e it DATE CIRCULATED: DECEM ER 17,' 1987 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 31, 1987 rOLICY DEVELOrivici ��r,„u��„• EFC - 090 - 87 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 D DEC 1 T 1987 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES _ �n PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA jiU BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PIAN APPROVAI TO AjIOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX Al 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 'e 3) Water V 4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals tee 6) Energy and Natural Resources 'e 7) Environmental Health we 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ I�Y 9) Housing we 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation ✓ 15) Public Services 'e 16) Utilities pe COMMENTS: ltLt C%tt-t.CwiGC4. 2t- /— Ad.JALti.vtrytAdytor AA, 1010Wf. -t twl, , relu24 —. taikease 2 . A '1'r -wt of- +AAA., r'o L I�c� to .t ACGc4.41.inn of- Fr �28 li ° I I! u 1 flo We have reviewed this application with particular attent ar- q:•Ct1 se, areas -we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. aurvue vtAutitt /ktPid Jdi�Signature of Director nr uthorized Representative Date Form 4 // RENTir `,BUILDING & ZONING DEPA -WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090 — 87 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) ; SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 '15) C 1 1987 RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROPONENT : � � r5 11 qp F r PROJECT TITLE : ! RENTON.VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE—PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT—PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT E POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 ; 00 P .m. ON iIFC`F.MRFR Rl l c1R7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; _Itrittielfateigt- APPROVED U APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED (kiti;14 .1/114#1Aild( t ZS/ 1��5 DATE: Deumtitrite SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: t)ulice DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMER 17, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 31, 1987 EFC - 090 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAI TO AllOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & ;.,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX Al 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 1 �1 .1 K Ire WQSI. �104/Y� �or I vU-C IL ; 0.Uo L1 ct �1a ri^Po - qe r, �1 1,a J We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Form a RENTI' BUILDING & ZONING DEPA MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 090 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO: [1] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING 'DATE : UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ELPOLICE DEPARTMENT • POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO- THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON n CF.MRRR 11 i QR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Iola E1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED . �-- DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 2149N En , )NMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE. _ i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Zor,o DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17987 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER� cI�,_��87 t EFC - 090 _ 87 ® I7 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 L I PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES J A N 2 0 1988 PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA DUI' DING/ZoN,iVG npp-r BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PIAN APPROVAI T(1 AI IOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air z 3) Water 2 4) Plants riK 5) Animals x 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and ShOt4le Use 9) Housing 0) � 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation \\\ 15) Public Services ?C 16) Utilities COMMENTS: (S) - 11- RAM., 5 ppi66 � T'« ,-I' PCB-- ;-f p/U5T 15,501) Cefuuatior1 + ZGri 0 E?,O t D 11+6 cifQ,eivA , w'Lu k -0 0 03 3 P C frSj%i- , e god tc5-7, • N a 6n 3, Trcet , ►N 1I+fi-r PR, Pr ire R,E- f3-i u o '/ Ji g nirb LI)I LA) a uP ti.,��-- -R<u,(Ki To ?k CONaz.aci _D K,©Y) 1* 50 a0-I' SI c G &Rpoki, vAst-( ( C.Of RE' I C( NCtJ ►U pj\iuj) ' V i .o D fT movf 2?—;12;) We have reviewed this application with particular attention to tho have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Dire wr or Authorized Representative Date Fr,- A I ' /91a ? 005N 911,E m 919'4 n9 IS c9sool,old 901►Xt1 +I M ( ) izDsaisid 9w.si eolspg 110 au ,+os is orirDNI os'rd cf-ribs da2Pc1 ')Kvr??d 3JIQ Lno 'j! / 1 Y._ . RENT, BUILDING & ZONING DEPA IAENT I(. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 09° - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT : RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : RENTON.VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS.: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5i00 P .M. ON T) 'RMRFR i 1AR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; c.OA1i �2 . 111 APPROVED [-XiAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED L R�� beCki)Da6 5006 ylz.eeti p ofbS o 5v40Utio 1,40, A, A 2" G4sL t IZ M IAJ i nnLk Vl a it 11 1M °SI YY16110-TRIO PYI 1101 rh �'��sG1/� - o I��' wog og IAPcNQscA�t W6"Lc COLA RG 6 mt\i-I vo I Vv C omlr6 a e w 1 p�cl Duoo.1. frifor04, PLAkyluu6 Pcrczpi Th bcpc1 TO s�4o5p V - DATE: /-/9-88 SIGNATURE OF DIRE OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 - IL • 2149N ENVJJJNMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C .M 11 M1-e S DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 17, 1987 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 31, 1987 EFC - 090 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(S). : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT: RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE: RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITF PI AN APPROVAI T(1 AI I OW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS. LOCATION: LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. SITE AREA: 7.7 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 36,253 SQ. FT. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT ' IMPACT NECESSARY 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources (1_ ) 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: (71 t F":NTnNI ‘:" r'; We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas we have expertise in and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. k z-L /se Signature of Dire or o Authorized Representative Date Form d , / RENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPA WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 090 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL: SA-103-87 PROPONENT : RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES PROJECT TITLE : `- RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 SEATS)TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36,253 S.F. AND 2,260 SEATS'. LOCATION : LOCATED IN THE RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ; 14 UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT c�7 '�-,; E NTf 'J BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT E ' l,.' �'� r 1=`j ., POLICE DEPARTMENT ' JIM 221q8B Ei POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ri OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON nFZC`F.MRF:R 1 GR7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ® APPROVED 1 PPROVED WITH CON ITIONS OT APPROVED -SA) CPSO DTILLTV APPROVAL SUBJECT T •I_ -- LATE C RS AGREEMENT-W�::aR � 0 al. .�.. a r LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEER A/Q SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER 1y ; S `,O4 FrrX 3 S 0,33 L _ */'40/, SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER yt5Syfr SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER A/D SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER No APPROVED WATER PLAN ( UrUW ytcx o CiATLI,U►,c 12/14/A ,APPROVED SEWER PLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS �J BY FIRE DEPT. . ►Y�Nek /° p a FIR E CLC:"3 ANALYST NO DATE: 2--j" /0 0 SIGNATURE OF IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 P5. 001 NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN APPROVAL SA-103-87 RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA. Application for site plan approval to allow the expansion of an existing three-plex cinema (20,000 S.F. & 1,405 seats) to operate as an eight-plex cinema for a new total of 36,253 S.F. and 2,260 seats. GENERAL LOCATION: LOCATED IN RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY. PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2) BUILDING PERMIT The application can be reviewed at the Bulding and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2540. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. Ronald G. Nelson Building & Zoning Director CERTIF1ICATION I, i EtZ R'f F . L t KtO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 I4Ic (3 COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME O DEL,emBEit 30 ,19 8l ( 3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEAR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in rt/T 60/4- on the J O z a day of DECcni3E2, / 987 SIGNED: v 0L OF RFC O �� °©` 2 � '� 1111N1 DTICE ,flq e. OggTFO SEPTE�O OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D E S C R 1 P T I O N • SITE PLAN APPROVAL - P L SA-10 3 RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA . APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING THREE-PLEX CINEMA (20, 000 S .F . & 1, 405 SEATS) TO OPERATE AS AN EIGHT-PLEX CINEMA FOR A NEW TOTAL OF 36, 253 S. F . AND 2, 260 SEATS . GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED IN TO RENTON VILLAGE COMPLEX AT 25 SOUTH GRADY WAY . PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : 1) SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2) BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND Dliklig6 PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOr n . PROPER AUTHORIZATION • r Yet'' -�` ti tel .r .. jj �i 4 z:.'"V11: x r-r.:--- :•R.iri t " ' 1 ' -r,� Alt r t j, y a n y .•f t " .5.,,;-' :2;, � ;F -r i''•'I. •.S> 1/4 -;:.r p,- %. 1 ,, `�'?i 4 5 4'"' if...Y<7.F 4. 4'Lr, I r,:.: J'1 l' .i t . y; ..,�, - a- �._.. .�. stiv t .a -: > tf ry a.. 'y ..� ,r f :7 ti f.17 '4'....rS.r...r .. '°v"'♦ �,�:-i.h C 1..I w ...Y I .�-i 4 t'' v'>,�, J t r.�t r r lC y�-E z ,y 'rf ,i *.' ' x "'9t( l ---'A r r, i v - Y f .J .r+' 1,..•,•�`rKx1,',74 'e,-... y - . ,w"„,;, .,�` � <ia a f �`.t• a L r,..:� I� S + ti �rr: ,-,'-"' tsfr.S'�Z . * .., `t' 'ten • r v r >. ,' .y K } r a 1 ' a S J r, vi 'I P 1 v++•I -1 � 7 rLL D .i t I I� S ✓ y } i A J I t ,_ A j. �'t' 1.1 f, • �{4 a'Cv rt r'r X Sl.Yt l .7 t• d .f + 1 t , •T' fi r0... •.,.. - . .. a ram! ti-c S cyt ••'_,"`r. i .a,."• - ri. 'S S- ..{ '� 't •ev T + r>+�•':: ..t JS' s, ,.r 4, J .+.•� H 4 P. ..4 n T 7.-.4. xxlF+,,°? 5v, j a'� .. Y� fj., �-'1''4 � t� 1 >, r'4.i f. M � J XLt y i t ,� �• s r � J -C+, �,t t s` �t r� ar i, r'f i•4 ''" -f .1 '-'`''0 4 ? ' 4 s .z 4 , 4 C 5 _ '!G f !r ..s�`ti . > ' st l.>, - T. y., 5-•" •......• - ..:,-..1-:. _ r.' .2 'ti • ATTACHMENT # 1 KING COUNTY • NO EXCISE TAX AUG211987 Filed for record at the request of: Elizabeth Fitzhugh LQ�6�0 Cohen & Kaplan J 1 2200 Fourth Avenue I1.0 l Seattle, Washington 98121 • STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED • •• CD N THE GRANTOR, Michael Sandorffy and Henrika Sandorffy, • Ln O husband and wife, as nominee, for and in consideration of TEN . N AND NO/100 . DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable GO • • O consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to Renton - Village Associates, a Washington general partnership, consisting • of Michael Sandorffy and Henrika Sandorffy, husband and wife, 6 Morris D. Muscatel and Cynthia Muscatel, husband and wife, and LU...AJ I-- Michael Goldfarb, as his separate estate, the following ` I— I described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of 1..- C- - Washington: 'S See exhibit A attached hereto and W ko incorporated herein by this reference. )•" Together with and including all fixtures and 00 improvements owned by grantor and located - thereon. Subject to the matters set forth in exhibit B attached hereto. • DATED this 20th day of August, 1987. 87'08'21 #3523 e RECC. F 11.00 CASHSL **s111.00 • i�'''"70'1 flIIIIP t• • -tIAL _.t f IVG' Michael S•n.l:rffy \Ilk �, � � NOV 231537 , :.�. Henrika Sandorffy m a C7-t 03 z rn 7c ry 0 BUILDING'BONING DEFT, c��:T rn .J 2038F - 1 - �, c En :_7 m 3. in-n .�� fya ,tea ,t, 4 «r .wl•.{1C r� K f s e�"�{S'.i' r� •1* '^ r y �^'1- a I &:;4:* k*+c ` �' 'y%Wrg 'N7NNee. `-Jtil'�j,5i. '�y Y ?Z 9r ft•. .-V 1,r'4R sK�iryt' xy...�j Mrv'r-a! �f•7.•. i s c-•kiM .V;ewy,.T.-.4„ .+t t,'•.(s 'i!•.,>- ;.• ur -Slxe_ t(!t tf .!.. { s., .5*. . "-• 0.) r.C^..' rra 7+ t '7'a.r "•"t'•'�` >, .m I t ��'T'�'.f••J:�^K�v.s Jre3 r"`1s•f r.3"�x e�tf ft�, a"` ...:.. '" •sa,t' i% -a y.t -aeu"�}« } - 3 k.a .t�^' rI" xs'. :y 1„A �,t1` i 7 !'^'a i t e4w.l T"'C, A;,•6.•'..4a�" .e.,C4 i.?�r4 .;x, 'i> fS.,ii -IIN'r •y'4 - , a ' r 4tw tV G+.72 r+� C�'S - ...j P. ,� `t. . %" C.K rr y+1, Z['�f� t-Y > �t .+.w3= l.:=;, .;t>�Fy7 ,v'r"'• ..Z t ti-a , :.v. y r,:•.•' • I'-fz o r �4.ytr I era , -r tirii 'Ct,-- ,..,." xp. a t�-1-1.1.i>..:. , �.,.. a i .,n+'K v, �.,xrt T '3.3 j f e 3 S -•rf Y" 'il• HdNY �. rj � 1"'�"�•� i n -r '�4'i-+'" .f�. f.'f. ,� '-r>, )� 3i r „1 -�-; ,�,>te.�r'dk(�jyl ..� � S ys r��,.y 46S'i 1'.^ � '1,� 4'k ! ��.- �"'Cr �s •r +i•7'1 •r t,Y�-iy'tIt .v. ,r;,TAItn\t ' i` :N f= r pr Lr ? I I.LL BT sr zs tea';,,,,, -„4,.G '�eF%, ? r t�i 4i� =Y e«^'� $ i �ltr:: AUG 211967 t► - � f : r. : ,v f s s . -Z15 = . �s � ,. •.-t.. .4 t ry ,c r t i ar' rh .R.>? v...r •�l u .'^M� y Si ',1" r ,may .s y1. q v r • � n r Tv x.ry' r y♦`�•1rr. {y`;!N•S y t . y ft`.. Jam✓ a .r .}a-��r./�t i ne, r ti•D v-�.y«i..3 l a �i.r t r F.(g �x 54 Yi:'l •. .fyn Y .,.fit d..j ✓ f. /r'•3, r�i rv�r'x�i•-tn- S,..;• y t•4,. Yvr,�t, s' ,J_``; se i Z,"'t15 hiV• >,�}J t � •�J�-Jr� rS r. t � 7 irr ..Zr.( r'i, F,} � t •.a`1, t 4 ,Y '• i�•2 Y• t } r '�1 �t t 4: v'� > a� tf s t r r { R . , 0. - a i ! ., i Yr, _ '' 'r F �'F -r r ' -+,)� f` J 1 ry t i y L /tiY :✓ JY t 1 ,.1� i y. a1.. 'k" '�� _ •c-R * 7 1 r:-y "Y. y ,-- --C ii y.- .: �, , 't f .r j , y` ♦' hk ,-1 3' 1 1 ,.1 , rf ps,�t '^% t wr titi. ar r.. >:t > r „.; a , s C •• z'h. ` 'rs '� • 3 t T ..c, irk�.' k•kt {t .17.. :a,:::,- rt i 4 ,- t e n�) b ., \ rip ? b M f:' y S � .. r 4 e-,.r � ti 4 r>.bi.q ti+p .� �.{, i�L -i- r.v - - sr r 5� r �' t >.. vy� ,z 1�,-.. • t. t � -� r•1,. u r r t 4r-j ) •• ,. 1'ti ?"a✓J �. .? .t .1 •! I-. t c b.t i7 y r �,a•• 1 .:„ - r r. t � ,: •'\ s-�_•: yrL . .4 . • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) 1 I CERTIFY that I know or have satisfactory evidence that i Michael Sandorffy signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. ATED: • /jp • 497 . • • Signature of Notary Public • c40�• Title:".:2 .;*--4l1 �„� My Appointment Expires: ,4- . VI STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ht ) s s. CID COUNTY OF KING ) O EN- I CERTIFY that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 4+ Henrika Sandorffy signed this instrument and acknowledged it to • . be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED: a ka. '9c7 1:&;27--4-4-4-`--- .72a"-°"""*"--. .. Signature of Notary Public�l Title: /�?i°r✓ .-e� , 4 /`,lc(_o,2_,,,,✓c, - • My Appointment Expires: /_l_f7 . r t • • .1 2038F - 2 - • d -x"`6� ZJ r w�ry• n,.... 4N-"V xx ,,,5`. i„r ,�'rxy,'�i�,„:,- •w`ev-,At y',,•,• ..1+.j'.f1'_,� *M1P�� ,2 N. t J. -h • !k fa l .•i. Nri SY /...• ,ay,+, �"t"Y^s�u�aT w4 Pi y,,, :vMt-� a'�t14.7-,�,S.c� lir ''g. 'CI-�..�.,�yi yr .•* "J t,. r+,. =;•:4 :x.a' r• r✓r.S e. -,sitis4'. r-d. t?•' Tn� • vra'- �•,r,v,tt, jk •�r.'rM,,, r.�c t, 1 6,4 -, �: •t .,,� .y',�.,,z,v • 1=.'r..,,,�p �,'..zz-. h +tl L'-,�,y� ♦4 *SY' Jr„"' 3 K 4�J+�1>j. •�'r ys�vy,x•+1++�wrlr�'•t�h� .s ,}!. •1 anti .J.t4+' s�•�sou stl.,.-&z ,,ti t-•, ,, ..t� , ♦ ,,4�.,,r�ter' .,;e: 7z s ..ri.:24•xc�a r...r✓ z,y x .3. ,t. ,A b l• 4'. w .4•r S. v�..g s `.+,1 4 a''- 'v. 't �a•.,. J.A.:L. ';. •..>.4.�'he,-4F�.JJ '4 ,..f -.�, '=Y TTi•S } a-. �J'i� �-q �-. '>' t1�A.„ .,J•.i R..`tL` i '�... )l1 d)�i w �{'� ( . • ,-A. .!'t1 Y ,,%:,j1 'f f•'--tsl- �}: �t .; . ✓. �' NT 1�i,�`J Y f(-'! .) }',. k yli.: •C` �iEC'ti�'v�,r..✓. _ 3.s`y,C.*' r-.'`i. �^•.�,[f7 nf' .A � �Y >a�S�LY yt tyy. ✓ ae w �l •w't ZS •.' a . J ia•• a •� :.- Jw d r_. vg•'- t N+o>t•n,4','%_ �h.�.-,�s�,,''•,u 3_•n -v•r,.r'Rra•C t� .ti. > .y.Y,jt�.�'t �"."tn 4 ri��-. � y •!v '? `• �-r�.- "� /� II(� (� n/� �] STTY! -r - ,+0 '-w.i:,^.�'4'i,x P•••• '�.v,",:.4 "• •••7.r •r•e•t F Z`�;• 41?• i„ .a L,.+r?4. _ .,A 1l l7 /.1 1QP7 110 YI n ti w "",-,, ,.i,1.^,,..,- 4-z.f.4', T r"�'f_'v.i..c'....1- -t_ rK, �- �.� '-Kl7.^�• �a�S. ibt • ' fP,,`_"ti1 � +.w} L '4J'`�.. ` �`1 .,� ' '•�"' •�P •�` "''.7'!'•'7'n` 7 .• � • _'�l jo+'"�.l I h'�`tr s�K t '�� !'. i t �x}yr J a• i y" r t. '-lr' ti3 2�}, ti aJe�k• F 'h y y r7'•+.'r 1 t4 3'r t - ti+.;r.�t.�`j,1ir c �.S t4 c+•rrp�+jc ^,.j`.S't .w4s I T••'•� 't.y hZ :1 yf� ,irKf '4",rr S ' !'J 4 5..-ft`,y a�'„'��.s' f*j-�A t�,.i✓i.-( S `"r Y i �y.}r,�'1�mod...."',4 t iY .1•,1j(y1rv'�r��`'t F t_ r,,,Y t�i r. �r,r f' rfv tL- ray 11 ��!y{r+ •• + {1. • -1 r .•^! 1.V 14, �t h11 j •+ vt`!� 1J,1.+ �i1y� �G Jt� ty?1. t x 1lh t w'! y��+�S. r\.tj tti.w..:. r -r.•; .. L `{' i t�i`'1 y, + �4 �.r�A,,,...777 t t. r ti;�a,, ,,,+. «• S t xa' t ( ;. c Y y y ✓ ,...,� ; ✓ $}-� J "�. L+'S^�' n -+;r r^ HA .t. f +� { l}t \'+• •' 1�' { .al +. ¢ t • �,'4f){ r\il.1 �- r ...+ i + T•i a~' a w 'i Y r a: ^ Tr � t ri),- fi + r: a . Yi fy r �� s'S ��y-+S,tv •'{,yt r. J y tr:• S�z ., 3 p•T- - r. 9- �(i.� .1} " �! P j lr. • 1"�,•+' i�ti , ,�. 1•1.tr r,„r, y • a Z•• ir, • • ••?• • -'Ct•-•- ..n"s i t.� d. �'�"1V'S •2: .ram `} ri•rr�v..'t3,! rj+� aTl+ilartS, >rt' `.1,,l�ai,f. "'S t 'y sT J.f,v r° ! .n "S s • . '1- _ .. .•�..- +,'� j.l,... ..n3' .. ,+. - �... e. .., .�.... .... ._.. • • EXHIBIT A The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Blocks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, C.D. Hillmans Earlington Garden Addition Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington; • • TOGETHER WITH vacated 94th Avenue South, vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9th Avenue South, vacated 9th Place South, vacated 10th Avenue South and the vacated alleys between 9th Avenue South and 9th Place South and also between 9th Place South and 10th Avenue South, all vacated under Ordinance 2051 of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said • northeast quarter; thence south O1°04'08" west along the east line of said southwest 11, quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; C thence north 89°44'02" west, a distance of 18.28 feet to the true • point of beginning; U0 thence south 61°42'S9" west, a distance of 258.92 feet; C thence south 00°02'16" east, a distance of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. SSH No. 2-M to UQ Jct. PSH No. 2 in Renton (also known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest revision being November 7, 1986; thence westerly, northwesterly and northerly along said margin the • following courses: north 89°49'09" west, a distance of 44.72 feet; thence south 83°23'09" west, a distance of 82.06 feet; thence north 89°54'45" west, a distance of 241.66 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of • north 17°05'13" east; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of • 32°52'06", an arc distance of 224.19 feet; thence north 40°02•'41" west, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 288.8 feet • through a central angle of 39°58'00", an arc distance of 201.45 feet; thence north 80°00'41" west, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 109.2 feet through a central angle of 81°34'00", an arc distance of 155.46 feet;• • (continued) • • Y •i. '.••�.� a„�+,/��+��,n'' � ,�__� '��r��' d J}`�S+S ''� ,[*,r, !•a^0'` ��i..� '� �.�r' y-I` 'N`�.rn�r,ylrt•t � -�.L �•�C .X`�?'y L�, �" �QJ1Yr'7'g 7'��.,t t�iY^"�'i,'♦y.�y�a C.l`RJ�1yx�.a�.'+t�4t ,., .,d .1� -E/�. � l 3 �rf`�s' �. , Y e n.C'x 1 '� h � ell •�i'��/�� C' < f.Fw i Oe• - .�k. F -0 ��..._� i.fy��`T1�,P"�.x�'"'.y,;,±s•_4`- �. tu�N'-��`�t't Jeep T i�i��r Ic P •h} ti�"��°..!�''''r�tr` ! sx r.+ t'+...�...,."?- i-• "y`,roy�=wr'�� •��te'J�yu ��i a,.�.,pa, 3 � � ,F.a-y.at�� nR.oa Flal By Y1 P/ ` tea 1 r�yt�.a fS�7iF�tt�s v ti r fi' t T •.� � � < ;m.erc,4� ^ai-�` 1 A�•,x3��r,r�,�•C'� '�'_ �.'trr`-`�'w- �t<v,.r<i ""7+r AUG 211987 •,y• ,;}' at .. `x Y•�� t jr s-.v i.'"a .i 't' i{1�` "."J,i -•"S' 6 ..+r : , '•4-r� � x 1i ..'7'. y,r, •r j''' k li i t dt-se s y . `•fi r r r, rs iiw ?`'Ll, _04 ^e �!i y T- SS 1 +, ''cLp,.-V s , �7 �r $• •+',y,•y'7 ,,,, i nwY -t:;? r z•... 7. ',4: .5' f{i- 'er r•.' At - s-? ,-R•J ` y X r .,>. s ,..�.,` e y r,,„.,.FsJ ,)' ,i ,, kr, v � .r;,,,""o i,,t, •,^' $ r u r s•<t T y t` r �� ,c r ,,,.:,7 3•.; i J �'i 3' r -` t 4 rh .ha' 4 e-,rl•�t jig a c . Y 4 to 4. '... � a � } a.i$.- - <' .rl r 7�r S y ram` re K •s.�f�tix.', ,ti.'•is hr A z/ ,i y a,t",t l•.0 y 1 J�. f r� �lill}.r-�X 0y � r` S.Y Y t..\ l r`. 1r Ta S y. Oda 4":1 4R: 2r- 2?- t, Q j.L�x.r. f S.lZ � Y �' r r l r -rt Y r � 1, ' t4 t.E., n ..1 t' t T+ I y ,S y. r . y t, r rti 4t n - Sn.i• .,}'rl,_�- i_: - 4'y+•y h.(.( r, r4 J' ,, lam ,,at*'� 3 -.iL1 * r y e_L } t..c tit t r 5,, `. .! t:- h.�y7-.{✓.i.. y .-<"Y a o- r-. N <.S"• r . t-r '� ,c :1 t' t�r.s .y i• ,r ".,'-• a,.• ry'r r:,i, _. +..• ;.,. •.. ' .• • i t ry. <',,'+. C • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: 1 thencl north 88°26'31" west, a distance of 6.00 feet; thence north 01°33'19" east, a distance of 313.96 feet; thence north 41°34'50" east, a distance of 90.78 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway No. 1-L), being 100 feet in width as presently established; o thence leaving Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. No. 2-M to Jct. PSH . . No. 2 in Renton and along the south margin of said Grady Way North 77°28'26" east, a distance of 912.78 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 3,869.71 r feet through a central angle of 11°14'08", an arc distance of 758.84 • 0 feet to a point on the west line of land described in Exhibit "A" of O Quit Claim Deed under King County Recording Number 8208270355; rtq thence leaving said south margin of said Grady Way South O1°04'08" (\/ west along said west line, a distance of 840.76 feet to the north margin of said Renton Village Place as conveyed to the City of O Renton under King County Recording Number 5475310; N*. thence north 89°44'02" west, a distance of 372.42 feet along the Z north margin of said Renton Village Place to the east margin of • vacated said 96th Avenue South; . thence south 01°04'O8" west along said east margin, a distance of . 60.01 feet to the southwest corner of said Renton Village Place; thence north 89°44'02" west, a distance of 48.26 feet to the true point of beginning. EXCEPT That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township • 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, and that • portion of Blocks 13 and 14, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division Number 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King • County, Washington, and vacated streets and alleys attached thereto, described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the northwest quarter of said northeast quarter; • thence south O1°04'08" west along the east line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence north 89°44'03" west, a distance of 18.28 feet; thence south 61°42'59" west, a distance of 258.92 feet; thence south 00°02'16" east, a distance of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State Highway Number 1, Jct. SSH No. 2-M to Jct. PSH No. 2 in Renton (also known as State Road Number 405) as • • approved October 31, 1961 - the latest revision being November 7, 1986; ' thence westerly, northwesterly and northerly along said margin the following courses: 4. (continued) .J { � ,yam �,k jrlri �;.c� yy w.T'r. 7^•., -"-� 1 S .0'y 'SS.:.c i' ! ,i,...,;•• `'4 a `^ s :MINA-1. / RL4`rr. 'S3•- Y� ,,%:,� r T +..a. v . K6 a 'a-r �`� a_.s ^,n:"�:y. t. .r r ''du n. w's `...e.:••'+r`^�. ''�'frb n '~`i t'i w a. -u,.;.,{.�a. 7 3•.'.. r '' -J s,. ,•f err,/' 'err --'! �.•..- :J: `M v�' �1�TIt,N70y?]rj. y�i .TegtyaK i�,f ..y4(h: i;k { f.,,li�4•� Af.t> - ..4S '1 {.,Zr:', L i .. if?q, k�X..yh L y. Sy- �. !Y_ �rn ,4+'."'leyr C� .I ^� Y' >- �.. K � th i..d(^'• �7 �",4-t,iri I "i• .*-7?t •A'rt +ty Xey r 1'acy.:-•. Cr .; ,ei d .,.� r.x 7 }� C� f^ �r .� ✓ +3"'� „ LL •� �. ,,,, �t ti. iy-{ z � r.t Yr..: a,1-«"�'-E''� h,'. • ,''�� '. +� ,7rA.. ,j. .4y '4.y it ¢' t, tV'+'a.' •4, 7"; '4 r t. 'C'.^- .-.r' "• r v ' :7.. �`i+ h..a"�. ." ^'i - t vyn'r ' � t ,, x - S�•N4• is , • . .qy.�,` ,..esN'`d µa r •� r`�C'-..lev `".r .'•• . '' t-L.-41=. 2. r Yr. �+s . c -r..,. - .a `+-T �,„-4..F.i .,, r,:,-, »:3n`k , .„, c ',. rA .r ''"C"ir.1.,...:-...-', ''ti � ,. A U G 211987 : fl1ED BY S1� -...,mot s , 1-,.:k.. . t , N •*. r. , ^ �%. . { . ., k taac« ,,fit ti 1 d i . t r r`x,y�• 1 .e�,,i�. 'S ,� �,rs '�]'Y'� .r' C�, i•.,..rf. '')l u-l4" r x 1'r'_ _v�- ji+�1 i t 7, ;r {};�++ sts+'l� i r, u{''Sn•2,� As y' .1 -i.lY ',z.,, x� C , r r'.i ', 1 R ,, .ty ...e r 4,.. r f * 1 .4'0- -.r , `l`• . ` k 1Cr ✓.. ^-•n..+. .� t -- „; e F‘ ; :'YC .S..t h t '+'r d>• i'. . •rlt tl-.t t. =-11,^,{n ?r'' 4A,, >�.x. 4 .} ,�'^S`Y -T c+'. LL � •I_� } ! "- ' a ,,77 ✓ Y'}.- ter,{ S,- X+vi e '', fi�1a<4'r,?r. �, r5 F z ..i t• c '.. y °+ a' ' H .. ,,' i a 1, y u .J 7 ) N r Y t ♦ a � � 4 , r < t 1 �* f'r•4' ♦ �.r� k, r y i. 4'r i-1....II,'`' 4r.•.,11 )1,•t 1 r t- r r s �f.71 + ,f `�, 1 ✓•�� t i5.t y Gy -Ta., -- `dy>f't 7wi.}•.t ;I W grtrY-r } •l,• Y hd �� IK 1 v 4 ,�'f v a rM y .� a, ram � a� ,rc i• ,� 7a r :K�.•' j era:A' ra , •t�,-;#• ,'�� r� as yi i F -' r•faa (1!." O ^ Y JYa=, • . "'r ar 1 i a f art 5 ?.< ,, r. , LA ,_r o y•t 1,'' rz 1,a r ;_ tar t' < -,.< -;:e-( ,, , -�iuD *, `NC ter,, - i r' north 89°49'09" west, a distance of 44.72 feet; thence south 83°23'09" west, a distance of 82.06 feet; I thence north 89°54'45" west, a distance of 241.66 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of north 17°05'13" east; • thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of •• 32°52'06", an arc distance of 224.19 feet; • thence north 40°02'41" west, a distance of 150.00 feet; • thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 288.8 feet " through a central angle of 8°00'02", an arc distance of 40.33 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing along said northerly margin and along said curve • CAI through a central of 31°57'S8", an arc distance of 161.12 feet; . 0 thence north 80°00'41" west, a distance of 100.00 feet; • p thence along a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 109.2 • v'•i feet through a central angle of 81°34'00", an arc distance of 155.46 feet; ao thence north 88°26'31" west, a distance of 6.00 feet; NC thence north 01°33'19" east, a distance of 313.96 feet; . thence north 41°34'50" east, a distance of 90.78 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway Number 1-L) being 100 feet in width as presently established; a thence leaving Primary State Highway Number 1, Jct. No. 2-M to Jct. - PSH No. 2 in Renton and along the south margin of said Grady Way • north 77°28'26" east, a distance of 415.16 feet to the northwest corner of land described in Indenture of Lease Modification and Extension Agreement between Renton Village Company and Chevron • ' U.S.A., Inc., recorded under King County Recording Number 8412210417; • thence south 00°31'47" east along the west line of said land, a distance of 150.00 feet to the southwest corner thereof; • thence south 03°18'52" west, a distance of 151.44 feet to a point on • the north line of vacated 9th Avenue South (Memphis Avenue) as shown on said plat of C.D.. Hillman's Earlington Garden's Addition to the • City of Seattle, Division Number 1, said point also being the ' northerly prolongation of the east line of Lot 4, Block 14 of said plat; • thence south 01°23'49" west along said northerly prolongation and east line, a distance of 166.01 feet to the north line of the • vacated alley attached thereto; thence north 89°44'03" west along said north line, a distance of • 120.00 feet to a point on the northerly prolongation of the east i line of Lot 33; Block 14 of said plat; thence south 01°23'49" west along said northerly prolongation and •I east line and the southerly prolongation of said east line a rJ distance of 202.93 feet to the true point of beginning. f• • mt/9506g • trot `Yji.r, S`�7"" r ui,�tyf. 7r.q�,'aSiZ Y�'+ '� trK.4T r 4f �..� d.`t . yP 'a 3, <P' .•:::40 ,y.r .t s ter. Y '4 rF xlY ,-..,-.1- ^""`4''aa wi#- ,%-, PS `t t f ,t'Pt '}jo-`t Tta.,,.y ..q--...t6.,.r a`:r' o j-,t*::1,?-/- -�'7"• r Y FY• Nd�SS rY• 'a y7• z 4•+.. (`, .-r`iM '''U.'. v� � a. > a 4.s:t,�fir t, • �v -,ti b `h-i� �.a- v ' . :. .fy aT "^+a+n,�{+',r4n�,.2 4• 6q.Y f'4 y' ( +'rma""'' 'er.. •r{; "1t ',j,•.s?#y� s� �Yy. . g yr ati4 . . -,"k-st r °." 14 ^` ay Y -'es. 4'.. v <r. f ,,.r .�+ � -sr tit..+"�+ Nc <• p q f'y + t;•„�� cF +-�.r., f c l',;:.,`"+��' �� '�± '�-' .r7": •� c r Wiy,. t.2 .-4f4,-k.� ,. .' . b.i rti+'+- -Fib 1'F, :c,: - tY !�•w�' f„r 4a�TaJ � x�.,3-•, � } ..i v'' a:G£� r'��£..�i t` ��`' —�' rrrr .;qc. � *y ` -•�.s ' ^ z.2 t ,„... _ t-w J.,t.i .t f, C.n-fix •nd/f.�.-r s.55,.r ,, a.i. _ ;,,, , 3 y i--.,, .. �^- }a '_`- n� .S.::.,zi n?. 0'1%""X t' ar' ... .+ 7•'t:ir.. ..uy'c�Y �t r.tiU':;.`1r r a .�Sq?.;.` -,"• s x.,,"" .: ri,[n Ar Y-„r'". ..?ty1t-.,r,?,.,�,. w ".t.rfe,,.�.-_it r i'' h' rt E 1,' b`3''h` 14,'�`,741.57,3 N • num Y 1 VW •-"9,', $$,z{��ti r..�,,ry4,..:,K. s,,,,,^ ^, -� sir e,,,, �a .._, ,yfi.a. AUG211987 'I - �;'�. .. , _{ .. l�� r- a, , . ♦ r^r 5, t ri yt �i"Nr "'r7 k] j .b - �f ,�f ,{ t "• r i4`K'" X�'.�"� Ti VW` ' {9. t .VJ..t yy' . :�<'.41.- rt IC,•.yn•1 r “ -t..ti 3"t-•-. Y � t/, 1 I4`T -L .Y, a •C7 I 1 '� t ;„ ,.... .4 a C x"r w'r_i 3l ;f 7' G 2'7y, Y x 4 S 5. •at tl� j ,�� *e ''~$rl ' ,v 6 .x .,: r :,`'-' t I`+a .fir. )'1 ra. tt .-` ,.♦• h'.s vt„ ry. ..L'. ti -*,� t..• ' ak +l,� „ �.t.-F4�,�� .tr"k„r'R..'...�,i• y ,��'� tk� �Ki 5 t CJ a.1 '1;'3 7,y yKt;-:rq> p�y1 �,fh }y`� iL,� T y' W 5.i*Ptxf'%.t-e 1 �/� _A4 t.L MH,? , t ti 1J It ' d1 0. '� F • l !Z -1) V 4 , 3 M�:: '{ S v i U '1 c� 7 . 741. S r r 7 J ,t Cs'I,q4 i J.1 �.: t 4 r-x F��.(� <�, ;k 1 F Z t x , a! !n. -t ( tl r r 1 f r t } r •. r 1 4 '1^ ;^x Y � " �� 1 x 1 v t t ) t TV: 7 f' h' 1 . i're ! .. .i,- r ,' . 1, kt r r- f 1, t i.1's k I .. 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE: Sanitary sewer i AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises RECORDED: March 20, 1970 • CD RECORDING NUMBER: 6631804 OD CD UC . 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton L7 PURPOSE: Construction, reconstruction, maintenance, removal or relocation of N a waterline AREA AFFECTED: That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington and of Blocks 11, 12, 14 and 15 of C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington and of vacated streets and alleys, and of Block 5 of Renton View, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 33 of Plats, pages 25, in King County, Washington, lying within a strip of land 10 feet 7 in width having 5 feet of said width on each side of the following described line: I Beginning at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 19; thence south O1°04'08" west along the east line of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter a distance of 6.26 feet; thence north 88°55'52" west a distance 100.95 feet to a point hereafter designated Point "A"; thence continuing north 88°55'52" west a distance of 110.00 feet; thence south O1°04'08 west a distance of 204.53 feet to a point hereafter designated Point "B"; thence north 89°44'03" west a distance of 101.00 feet; thence north 42°18'31" west a distance of • 477.48 feet; thence south 89°28'13" west a distance of 160.00 feet, to the true point of beginning; thence north 00°31'47" west a distance of 156.00 feet, plus or minus, to the south right-of-way line of South Grady Way and terminus of said easement. RECORDED: May 12, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7505120351 • EXHIBIT B .1 rr A,.V.t ��A '.."' ,r'`.,r,.urn{'-...5T d ��'"" 5 � I'-.} `C .t.r411 yE,:fV'fTM-t�','^.,i.,a .tip 21 s.M171... .,.,r,'.. 4,5 i; .+'a`i .. 'y5[. �'`V .?&y au+r cR �.z;• y.._ #'r.r12z '%Z �5u'r'`-Arm 7,, 'f r',Cr '.. ...:;- y ,�,,,,,,� t',. tir vk -.L. '+i r .l V.i N� z. ram:§4. .; "�� .�.> i a t W n s , ,„ < 4 '� r '',a'e° $ ,.,.f t�2c 1 l`3'�.m`�. �k� "'�.'�Y�' .+t"''� s 35.:� t r xs.'r • ..<�ill�.-r y 'ly7-.l"`-144r,�Gdf ,,,r•> ..:1,-v "-y"�{��. .4:',?W :*- 't +of ,:lcZ' t-'.iy air4:vt';�? , j''�Y �y .-�• .---. :. ♦- ,;. s:., 1. r ,�{ r e.. ."" y'Yr'� x '�.1N'v'f♦ F .,-`'t v .J"i � --+ C 011. .1e a.12rT '_��,t .yq' .',.., tJ 't� 4"4t.:t5� ` -E1-47.� '♦.i y ^�4 r ust .. 3,a7 'r'a�,. �L.` t 'r~. ,t-. '+.':.4' ^� rA . r,'. ✓! r ,.. - '],w w,Lr ij,,,,. o s.. {r trr r t a'r y��'zs- R,3�#'��-ys .a,., ;�,-"'�� r-:�,�;,�.,�,Y,�,�:�� ` ;..�r� r�if;�ran�~�.P•y.V- -r� xTv 4 �},•,��r'r�,>w+"n:t •. T tp,r;r' ',r r ,.,Z2,'.T-' i c''r �, .n i. ♦t 1 v E9''a+!-4-ty . t 1' r .:. ;.w�zi i *t4srz" '.t ,vt ['•t ,.4 't-_,-*,3ti�;Fi`r, t n ar Z 7 w Fr .�,,"..? "1 ,,} SL + .'."4 t"r y .�?7,tA .1' �. ,y y s� �< .{4S...r tus �,= t. L �� BT S ''Y' t 't f I'.�' �`�v --• 1.• Y fS'0.„.`. y'k''.xi-...,f,.!.t �ti LN. AUG 217987 ( 'fi - • -.�:,��- � " : .':„-1. -.'�:. ` 1 . / • � � C •�• tY ry,,, w.�3 � y�'�� yY. T ,gyp 1 �'�jL L{�I •< i . f '$,,,a..ti, 'Y`,,c• ," A N �r2' _A 2 T' ��' 11 r k 3�r '} •tea .-f ..yS�{��rn si' ri„r} r 2U `+,""' •e �lX �Sra� '�- ' 't s .7` _a -!.S"`5 1 ". 'Z`+-tit kt ; �5•.'-� ,f: YN� i i { i'•3 Y qq..�fs J�YY 1 1 yr4, '1• t s� -,.. :r-2•1 r< :.r; 'S �`- 'y2`'!'r.i a t y 1` st t()Y Szs't.(r �'"✓S` S L J VANr�CYY 1s. .;1f� • r ✓ 11 �. f t� I t1 7 t T.y 7j'. �r-(�1'•�^Sr�� 1 • r rt •C1 }" N -.n off fi- fT {hi ) i (' 1 ( ts '/ iii l�f P/ -♦ tt••ic lr-1i 11 >{ i. �� l' fjkf tF li is Sw' 5J f- '1Y �. 4. + ex M1. 4 a <L• S �t 1✓ ti1y .1' •'} • l ••,-• \•u J7w -t n { y a '} �f -' SS�•..�t S 5 �•i • �r Sq• I7"1.• � rt+.- -` IL a.• §.,rS, .t,r1 9F •r . 1 . ;, ? - f5 t•i e • 3. EASEMENT•AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, • a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Electric transmission and/or distribution lines AREA AFFECTED: As constructed RECORDED: September 21, 1979 • RECORDING NUMBER: 7909210721 '~• 4. CONDEMNATION BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OF RIGHT OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, BY DECREE: • O ENTERED: August 21, 1962 V% CASE NUMBER: SC-588966 • 5. RELINQUISHMENT OF RIGHT OF ACESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF LIGHT, VIEW . AND AIR, UNDER TERMS OF DEED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: • • RECORDING NUMBERS: 5428436, 5440058, 5440059, 5443690, 5484949, 5484950, 5484951 and 5496454 • 24. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: To construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an underground electric transmission - and/or distribution system • AREA AFFECTED: Said premises RECORDED: August 10, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8708100374 • 25. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Operating, inspecting, maintaining, removing, repairing, replacing and using a communication line with all connections and appurtenances thereto • AREA AFFECTED: Said premises • RECORDED: August 10, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8708100375 Rights of tenants in possession. Matters revealed by-ALTA survey. .; -2- �# xs � [iLx,� • ��,} � ;lr, 1 y ` t;•z� , �°�� ♦ G f .i�gnl�F '7 y w t r seKf�6*'X�1 r+ew u� {t3�-, +�+ +y+�`f�� 1 ' �. �r•n ."r�y� .y,..r1,1..�L, x.-�`.�5s✓�t ��1�.s tN( •L�r F f`�:-v 4 1 ^• zC. �.,,. • ' T .L.:r�yyo�..4��'•�l2a"�. 'Y.�,1', L"�R �'+v.$`�}1' l=�y' C.:'i?itr•,'".'v'+f {c""`r-t- ,1-.�a7r'0''2r'M2•l^l�l 1 •- ti . . 1W aL-jR<i"*.`''K�,rl+T E'A��'}..:D:'Ik',Lji'J•rn'•a•.'•Ta.rT"-�a!tCY ayT�xc•fyl.-'I��er��`.',esS'1r'1 fc.V'Y,.��a�t iY�t'n"oti.'l.��,�t�t'.'*^i.T 4f�W a-':(!r•N r�. • Nyamc..r.•.'l 9�1��'�0�.F'R"yJ'7t�i_•l.11..a�i,'�'v5^k"'F rtY+t..`".t' ,••r. "ip ti'y. s o-. �'!` �"''�''�f" --e l+'r ,r-• �•" • r r� y 4 � a7i a;�'s 1'+p ,i`'', +.:�i" ice•''`"e-,t y-y �u r w> �'' •y yy�� --s ' a'""�'7ir ,e T _Y<'�;,i.. ""r's.• ,?^ �+*1^•. r.� •yam.•. 1, �+1r i.G"t4v p.Y �.,.. v t s' CY'' s Cam•...wsh•.n'1+d p1 [}� r�� vi�A._ ( '2Stu}' ` 7 ti 1L-_�y; ~ yp4:lty'h` 1+t S4 £: Fl�D YY 4±�SsTJ� il�fi. y�lcti' ty4�.�` '2� AUG 211987Y j� fT. RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION SITE PLAN APPROVAL LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: I. Application and Affidavits of Ownership (7 copies) 2. Project Description (7 copies) 3. Legal Description and Area (7 copies) 4. Environmental Checklist and Attachments (7 copies) 5. Mailing Labels of Adjacent Properties and Postage (I copy) 6. Vicinity Map (7 copies) 7. Site Plan (7 copies + I reduction) 8. Survey Plan (7 copies + I reduction) 9. Aerial mapping - 7 (7 copies + I reduction) 10. Landscape Plan - I0A w/attached site equipment (7 copies + I reduction) Site Shadow Studies/Section - I0B (7 copies + I reduction) II. Floor Plan (7 copies + I reduction) 12. Building Elevations w/attached roof equipment (7 copies + I reduction) 13. Building Section (7 copies + I reduction) 14. Traffic Analysis (7 copies) 15. Preliminary Soils Report (7 copies) 16. Site Acoustics Survey ' & riD i_. ,,--, ‘7-,-•-1 [in II ii p 6 NOV9 F- ..,04)1987 § lip Cir'r" 0,,. -_. bc/st97 N y e A . . 'ACHMENT #2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION A. The project consists of expansion of the existing three-plex cinema (20,000 s.f. and 1,405 seats), to operate as an eight-plex cinema by the addition of 16,253 square feet which will include 855 new seats plus a lobby and other general public areas. The expansion will require 214 additional parking spaces (855 seats at one parking space per four seats; Renton Code 4-2208,4) which will be provided through a joint-use agreement and easement on the property immediately adjacent to and east of the cinema which currently contains 220 paved and landscaped parking spaces. These adjacent spaces are now used for office parking for One Renton Place, however the cinema and office uses have dissimilar peak hours for parking (office: 7 a.m. to 3:30 and 5:30 p.m.; cinema: after 6:30 p.m. and weekends). This joint-use parking agreement has been submitted to the City of Renton for approval. B. The cinema expansion is expected to be complete the fall of 1988, subject to the timing of obtaining the necessary approvals and permits. Along with the site plan approval application, a lot line adjustment has been requested to modify the site's east boundary with the hotel, to establish direct lot access to S. Grady Way, and to conform the northeastern boundary to the location of a future public street. The Transpo Group traffic study attached (Attachment #14), concludes this expansion does not warrant any mitigation measures. Therefore, this future street and the northerly portion of the subject site are proposed for development when the undeveloped portion of the adjacent shopping center site is developed in the near future. C,'T Y G� nZ7ui ;"; [ [77 SCfj i�,hgLin al, private road through the site will be shifted north of its II Idurl6n ation where it runs in front of the cinema due to the cinema's NO 2 north expansion. The relocated road, utilities, and lighting will be c3� �ev ed to their present condition. A drop-off lane will be provided to emit impacts on the traffic flow and new designated cross walk areas and BUILDING/Z0NINGaddiitional speed bumps will be included. 7. D. The "open, public" planted space now located beneath the Seattle City Light transmission poles will be modified. This existing area is minimally developed and marginally conducive to public use due to its design and location. The proposal would retain a portion of this area (with upgraded landscaping) to maintain a landscape buffer around the new parking area here and to the south. To replace this reduced area of "open, public" space, the proposal provides increased, landscaped public areas both between the Evergreen Building and Cinema and around the Cinema, closer to the principal user, the Evergreen Building. In contrast to the existing "open" space, the new areas will offer large lawn areas, deciduous shade trees, and individual and group gathering areas with tables, seating, etc. in a more comfortable, user-friendly setting. • • PROJECT DESCRIPTION GENERAL CINEMA THEATRE EXPANSION (continued) E. The existing parking area in front of the Cinema and Evergreen Building will be restriped and expanded northward into the "open" space. The lay-out of this new parking is based on the configuration of the adjacent future public street in its final, developed form. Efforts have been taken to reduce parking/traffic congestion and pedestrian traffic immediately in front of the Cinema and to minimize intersection impacts on the future public street. New landscaping and lighting will be provided in the parking lot areas consistent with the level of development with the Cinema. F. Despite the fact that the Renton Place office buildings are not owned by the applicant, the Renton Village area is generally perceived by the public as a single development. Understanding this, Renton Village Associates desires to establish and maintain a consistency of site lighting, levels and types of landscaping, and site features (such as tables, benches, etc.) on both this proposal and their future proposals. The types of features, lighting and landscaping provided on One, Two and Three Renton Place will be proposed as standards and offered for this proposal. G. The parking area located on the northern portion of the subject property (north of the Evergreen Building) is to be restriped. The restriping of this existing parking area will only create 18 new parking spaces. As a result, this alteration does not require City approval and is not included in the Site Plan Approval area. Again, this area and the area adjacent to the Chevron station will be included in future proposals for the undeveloped portion of the shopping center site. In summary, the project will result in an enhancement of both the appearance and image that the existing cinema projects to the surrounding area. It will also improve the level of finish of the site itself through the upgrading and consistency of the landscaping, site lighting, and parking areas. The amount of asphalt parking area will be reduced while maintaining the required parking per City ordinances. Better quality, more usable, outdoor spaces and amenities will be provided for the tenants on the site. The Callison - r, :i . :{ \' ; ' j,;;IV s )I LI/ 02(cx : / ;Ji',!` \1G Dl=PT. To: Date: / -3� � )(Transmittal7 --✓/ � / iC/sew t7 t(Zpvit o, Project iN o: 070147 _ n �,� Memorandum _ �/'ti�i_ _ XV-(a)Vi kfrIp✓''-% V•? Re: re& el/ � We are sending you gttached ".Under separate cover the following: .:Prints Originals Submittal Samples For your: formation and use Review and comment "-As requested Action required: As indicated .:No action required --For signature and return e5;frir ife?f:77/1/6.. /0/r/t,e50". COPV FOYed. L04,1g . 4WD • By: cc: � i fl' If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once. • Architecture 1423 Third Avenue (206)623-4646 A'Professional Service Corporation Programming Suite 300 Planning Seattle,Washington Interior Design 98101 The Callison Parr - ship October 29, 1987 ; I �. r 1 a Architecture RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Programming Planning Renton, Wa. Interior Design MEETING MINUTES Project Number 87247 Those Present: Don Erickson City of Renton Building and Zoning (City) Jerry Lind City of Renton Building and Zoning Loren Laskow Renton Village Management Corp. (RVM) Tom Goeltz Davis Wright & Jones (DWJ) Roger Blaylock The Blaylock Company Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership (TCP) Location: City of Renton, 3rd floor conference room Purpose: Review of site plan and approach prior to site plan approval submittal A. TCP explained the background and scope of the proposal. The most recent information the City had received on the Renton Village property was a short plat submitted by the previous owner. The new owner, Renton Village Associates, elected to withdraw the short plat to provide them the time to establish their own needs and plans for the property. This proposal is for expansion of the existing Renton Village Cinema (demolition of the existing 3-plex cinema building to be replaced with a new 8-plex cinema building with the same use, same tenant, and same location on the site). The expansion would create 16,383 additional s.f., 855 additional seats, and 214 additional parking spaces beyond that provided in the existing cinema. The additional parking is to be provided through a joint-use agreement with One Renton Place (previously submitted and currently being reviewed by the City). B. The City has previously expressed the desire for a public street through the property. Renton Village Associates agrees with the future need of this street and has planned the Cinema site to conform to the future configuration of the public street. Additionally, a public right-of-way reservation is simultaneously being submitted to establish its future location with the intent that the dedication and development of the street will occur when the development of the remainder of the shopping center site occurs in the near future. The City expressed the possible need for a written agreement to make the subject area conform to the public street landscape requisites in the future when the street is developed. 1423 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle,Washington 98101 (206)623-4646 The Callison Partnership Ltd.,A Corporation RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Renton, Wa. MEETING MINUTES Project Number 87247 October 29, 1987 page2 C. A portion of the existing parking is being restriped in front of the cinema and some additional parking is being provided both behind the cinema and in the location of the existing open space in front of the Evergreen Building. This space is currently minimally developed and only infrequently used by the Evergreen Building tenants. Understanding the need for outdoor space for the office tenants, the proposal is providing new space and landscaping in the form of new shade trees, lawns, walks, benches, and picnic tables in the enlarged area between the Evergreen Building and Cinema. These additions combined with the existing shade trees and lawns will provide a much better outdoor environment in a better location. The City noted concerns regarding whether the shadows from the cinema and Evergreen Building will significantly impact the area. They also voiced concern as to ? whether the traffic noise will be greater since the proposed location is closer to 1-405. Both of these concerns will be investigated in the submittal in the form of decibel level readings and shadow studies. D. TCP expressed that Renton Village Associates desires to maintain the consistency of the site features and landscaping. Although the Renton Place office buildings are not part of the property owned by them, the Renton Village site is perceived as a single development and the intent is to repeat the levels and types of plantings, site lighting, benches and tables, etc. both on this proposal as well as future proposals. Cut sheets of these items will be included in the submittal. E. The subject lot (note: only a portion of the site is to be considered in the site plan approval), is to be refined by a lot line adjustment to be submitted simultaneously with the site plan. The east lot line will be minimally adjusted to conform to the actual, related parking between the hotel and office building. The northeastern lot line will be adjusted to conform to the street reservation location. The City noted that this lot line adjustment will have to be reviewed as to whether the degree of adjustment conforms to the lot line adjustment requisites or whether a short plat is in order. F. TCP explained that a traffic report by the Transpo Group will be included in the submittal. The study indicates that based on both statistical data of similar generic cinemas and of this specific cinema, the contribution of traffic to the peak hour congestion is insignificant due to the non-peak hours of operation. G. In review of the building plans and ele ations, City noted that since no screening of the roof top equipment i proposed, cut sheets of the equipment would help determine their impacts. These will be included in the submittal. The City also inquired as to whether the existing cinema sign on S. Grady Way will be upgraded. This will he clarified in the submittal. e RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION Renton, Wa. MEETING MINUTES Project Number 87247 October 29, 1987 page 3 H. The City stated that the review time for site plan approvals will be approximately 4 to 5 months (maybe as long as 6 months). The City added that they will review building permit plans during the time that a site plan approval is being reviewed. The building permit plan review could take as long as 3 months. I. DWJ noted that the approach of the proposal was as an expansion of an existing facility and use, on the same location, by the same tenant on an existing, developed site and in the interest of reducing the review time, `2 questioned whether the hearing examiner would have to review this proposal. _The ity explained that since the new, final square footage /Z would be_ over 20 00 s.f., and the total required parking spaces would be o ev r 2 0 his proposal would be considered a new development and would be reviewed by the hearing examiner. These minutes are an accurate account of the meeting comments to the best of my knowledge. Please contact me if any questions arise or any discrepancies are observed. Brian C. Cloepfil The Callison Partnership, Ltd. bc/st 114 cc: The City of Renton Building and Zoning: Don Erickson, Jerry Lind Renton Village Management Corporation: Loren Laskow Davis Wright & Jones: Tom Goeltz The Blaylock Company: Roger Blaylock The Callison Partnership, Ltd.: Tony Callison, File I • I i DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES LAW OFFICES - _ A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2600 CENTURY SQUARE ' 150I FOURTH AVENUE ' SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 9810I-1688 (zo6) 622-3150 THOMAS A. GOELTZ CITy October 12, 1987 • 1 41987 Mr. Lawrence J. Warren Renton City Attorney � 3: Warren & Kellogg, P.S. IG ;O 'P ' 100 South Second Street P.O. Box 626 Renton, Washington 98057 Mr. Ronald Nelson, . Director Building & Zoning Department City of Renton Municipal Building • 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Renton Village/Joint Use Parking for Theatre Dear Larry and Ron:. We are preparing a site plan application for an expansion of the General Cinema Corp. theatre which currently exists within Renton Village. The expansion will include the addition of 855 new seats, plus lobby and general public access improvements for a total new area of approximately 16,250 square feet. Based on the Code' s parking requirements, the cinema will have to provide an additional 214 parking spaces (855 seats at 1 parking space per 4 seats - Renton City Code 4-2208(4) . We propose to provide these parking spaces through a Joint Parking Use Agreement and Easement on the property immediately adjoining and east of the cinema which now contains 220 paved and landscaped parking spaces used for office parking by One Renton Place. The peak hour parking is dissimilar for office use and theatre use and we believe the Code sections allow for this joint use. Section 4-2204 of Renton' s Code authorizes joint use of parking facilities where the joint users have dissimilar peak TELEX:328919 DWJ SEA ' TELECOPIER: (206) 628,7040 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA ' BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON ' RICHLAND, WASHINGTON ' WASHINGTON, D.C. 1110 I Mr. Lawrence J. Warren Mr. Ronald Nelson Page 2 hour demands . Boeing ' s actual office hours are 7 a.m. to 3 :30 p.m. Since Boeing is a tenant and not the owner of One Renton Place, it may be in the future that some other office use would be in One Renton Place, and the peak office hours might be extended until 5 - 6 p.m. on weekdays . In any event, the peak hour use and parking for the theatre is dissimilar since it occurs on weekends and on weeknights after 6 :30 p.m. The current theatre operator is General Cinema Corporation, which will also operate after the expansion. General Cinema has conducted its own peak hour analysis for comparable theatres (including Federal Way and Tacoma, both of which have joint use parking) . General Cinema' s information confirms the dissimilar peak hours . Their traffic data shows 81% of the patrons and cars are at the theatre on weekends and after 6 :30 p.m. on weeknights . Their data further shows that only 3 . 8% of the theatre patrons attend the theatre. between the hours of 1: 00 p.m. and 6 :30 p.m. during any weekday. We have retained The TRANSPO Group as our traffic consultant for theatre site plan application. They have independently evaluated theatre usage in the King County area (including SRO/Cineplex Odeon and Seven Gables) . Their data confirms the dissimilar peak hours. Weekday attendance averages 4% of the total theatre seats at the 3 p.m. and 5 p.m. shows . Applying the 4% to the 855-seat increase results in approximately 34 theatre patrons during those afternoon hours and approximately 11 - 17 cars needing parking (assuming either 2 or 3 people per car) . In sum, the office parking spaces at One Renton Place are available and are in excess of the parking requirements under the Code, i .e. , one parking space for each four fixed seats - Renton Municipal Code 4 .2208(4) Parking Standards . In addition to the shared parking proposed at One Renton Place, we will have additional on-site parking. [Note: the theatre' s current code parking is provided on-site] . After the site approval work, there will be 385 spaces located in the immediate area surrounding the cinema. Further, there will be 195 stalls located on-site but further north (although these are located within 500 feet of the theatre) . These 580 'stalls are used during the daytime by the Evergreen Building, an office use requiring 380 stalls under the Renton' s Parking Code. The additional Code requirements for joint use are satisfied. The joint use parking is located within a 500-foot 3 Mr. Lawrence J. Warren Mr. Ronald Nelson Page 3 radius from the theatre. Further, the contract covers more than a minimum of 5 years. In fact, a. permanent easement declaration is being proposed. I enclose a draft of the Joint Use Parking Agreement and Easement which would be entered into for parking on the One Renton Place site. This would be recorded with no expiration or termination date. The Evergreen Building and the theatre will continue to share parking after the enlargement, and are in the same ownership and on the same tax lot. I assume no joint use agreement is required by the City where two uses are occuring within the same ownership and upon the same site. However, if such an agreement is a City requirement, I will forward _a Declaration of Joint Use Parking and Easement which would be executed by the owner of both the theatre building and the Evergreen Building. I would appreciate your review and approval of the joint use of parking facilities and the enclosed agreement. The satisfaction of the Renton parking requirements is an important part of 'our _site plan application. If you have any questions or want to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to give me a call. We are working with Jeff Webber and Lynn Prewitt of The TRANSPO Group regarding parking and traffic analysis and Brian Cloepfil of The Callison Partnership on the site plan application. Respectfully submitted, DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES T omas A. Goeltz TAG:bjw Enclosures cc: Michael Sandorffy (Renton Village Assoc. ) Loren Laskow (Renton Village. Assoc. ) Brian Cloepfil (The Callison Partnership) Jeff Webber (The TRANSPO Group) Lynn Prewitt (The TRANSPO Group) Jeff Harstad (Harstad & Assoc. ) 0892L JOINT USE PARKING AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT THIS JOINT USE PARKING AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT ("Agreement") is made effective the day of , 1987 by and between RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership (".RVA") and RENTON TALBOT DELAWARE, INC. , a Delaware corporation ("Talbot") , and is approved by BOEING COMPUTER SERVICES, a division of THE BOEING COMPANY ("Boeing") , to establish joint parking use as set forth below. RECITALS A. Talbot owns and has leased to Boeing improved real property containing an office building and surface parking areas and located in Renton, Washington and legally described on Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference ("Talbot Parcel") . The western portion of the Talbot Parcel contains a surface parking area (the "Talbot Parking Area" ) , which is legally described in Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. . The 225 parking, spaces currently within the Talbot Parking Area are available for joint use. B. RVA owns the improved real property containing the Evergreen Building, a theatre and surface parking areas located adjacent to and west of the Talbot Parking Area located on the Talbot Parcel . The RVA Parcel is legally described in Exhibit B ("RVA Parcel") , which is incorporated herein by this reference. A map depicting the respective Parcels and Parking Area is attached hereto as Exhibit D. C. RVA intends to modernize and/or expand the theatre located on the RVA Parcel and requires additional parking to satisfy the Renton City Code. The parties acknowledge the theatre' s peak hours of use and parking demand are at night and on weekends, whereas the peak hours of use and parking demand for the office building occur during the weekdays . Consequently, the Talbot Parking Area is not utilized during the times of peak theatre use and is available to provide theatre parking. D. The parties desire to provide in this Agreement for joint use of and access over the Talbot Parking Area by theatre patrons . NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration as set forth in the Recitals and otherwise, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows : 1. Grant of Easement. Talbot hereby grants and conveys to the owner of the RVA Parcel, and Boeing hereby approves the grant and conveyance of, a nonexclusive easement for parking and for vehicular and pedestrian access to, from and over the Talbot Parking Area for the present and/or future theatre located on the RVA Parcel. The easement is for the use and benefit of the owner of the RVA Parcel and/or the theatre located thereon, including but not limited to the theatre tenant and all customers, business invitees, licensees and employees associated with the theatre. 2. Maintenance and Modifications . Talbot shall reasonably repair, maintain and care for the Talbot Parking Area. If Talbot shall fail to repair, maintain and care for the Talbot Parking Area and if such failures continue for a period of thirty (30) days after notice of such failure is given by RVA to Talbot, then RVA may undertake such repair, maintenance and care, in which event Talbot shall reimburse RVA for all of the reasonable out-of-pocket therefor. Such reimbursement shall be due within thirty (30) days after delivery of appropriate receipts and other pertinent information substantiating the costs for which reimbursement is sought. Any amounts not paid when due shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum or the maximum rate permitted by law, whichever is less, from the date due until the date paid. Talbot may modify the easement area from time to time so long as the modifications do not reduce the number of parking stalls in the Talbot Parking Area to less than 225 . 3 . Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their tenants, heirs, successors and assigns . In the event the RVA Parcel is subdivided or ownership is otherwise segregated, all rights and obligations under this Easement shall benefit and bind the owner of that portion of the original RVA Parcel containing the theatre building. 4 . Attorneys Fees . In the event of any legal action or proceedings brought by any of the parties to enforce any part of this Agreement then the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for all costs and reasonable attorneys fees incurred, including any costs and fees on appeal . 5 . Amendment and Termination. This Agreement and the easement created hereby shall not be modified, amended nor terminated except by written instrument signed by the record owners of the Talbot Parking Area and the owner of the RVA Parcel (or the portion thereof containing the theatre building if the RVA Parcel is subdivided or ownership is otherwise segregated) . 6088G 2 111 • 6. No Merger. This Agreement and easement created herein shall not be extinguished in the event title to the Talbot Parking Area, the RVA Parcel and/or the Talbot Parcel., or any combination thereof, is vested in the same party or parties . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date first above written. RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership By Michael Sandorffy, its General Partner RENTON TALBOT DELAWARE, INC. , a Delaware corporation By Its Joint Use Parking Agreement and Easement is hereby approved by: BOEING COMPUTER SERVICES, a - division of The Boeing Company By Its Exhibit A: Legal Description - Talbot Parcel Exhibit B: Legal Description - RVA Parcel Exhibit C: Legal Description - Talbot Parking Area Exhibit D: Map STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss . COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1987, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared MICHAEL SANDORFFY, personally known to me (or proved 6088G 3 . I to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who signed this instrument; on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument as general partner of RENTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership; and acknowledged the said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed, as partner, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss . COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1987, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this instrument, on oath stated that was authorized to execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the of RENTON TALBOT DELAWARE, INC. to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss . COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 1987, before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , personally known to me 6088G 4 I s (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person who executed this instrument, on oath stated that was authorized to. execute the instrument, and acknowledged it as the of BOEING COMPUTER SERVICES to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires 6088G 5 •• 0 j • ti . ,11: 1, 1, L h) j ' f ,/ . u � o. t-'„.1r..Li, is /i_ONIj\ �D 'P �'•�� • EXHIBIT A 3 ( "TALBOT PARCEL" ) • :-_ Legal Description: t • That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19. Township : • • 23 North. Range S East. M.M.. in Ring County. Washington. and Blocks 11 and 12 of C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle. Division No. 1. according to the plat - recorded in Volume 17 of Plats. Page 74 in King County. Washington. and of vacated streets and alleys attached thereto. - and Lots 1 through 11. Block S of Ponrnn View, according to the • plat recorded in Volume 33 of Plats. Page 25. in King County. w �- Washington. and of vacated streets and alleys attached thereto. • - described as follows: i'1'd; Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Northeast Quarter of Section 19; thence-South 01'04'08' ▪ . West West along the Last line of the Southwest Quarter of the R . :i.ertheast Quarter. a distance of 224.15 feet: thence South SS°03'12' East a distance of 45.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 89'44'03' East along the South margin of Renton Village Place (North line of the Plat of Renton View Addition) a distance of 867.26 feet; thence South 01'24'03" • West. a distance of 123.27 feet to a point on the northerly margin of primary State Highway No. 1. (Jct. S.S.H. S-N to Jct. P.S.H. No. 2-SR 405): thence South 20'46'00" East along said North margin. 30.00 feet; thence along a curve to the right in a southwesterly direction having a radius of 1.810.00 feet - • through a central angle of 07'05'07' an arc distance of 223.83 feet to a point of curve to a spiral curve; thence along a spiral curve to the right on the northerly margin of PSH No. 1 the long chord of which bears South 79'20'21' West a distance of 292.06 feet to the point of tangency of the spiral curve; thence continuing along said North margin south 80'49'08' West a distance of 213.80 feet: thence South 09'10'52' East along said North. margin. 20.00 feet; thence South 80'49'08' west. - along said North margin. 27.80 feet to a point of curvature: thence along said North margin on a curve to the right having a radius of 11.380.00 feet through a central angle of 00'15'40' an arc distance of 51.86 feet: thence North O8'5S'12' West along said North margin 20.00 feet to a point of curvature; thence •leng said North margin in a southwesterly direction on • curve to the right having a radius of 11.360.00 fret through a central angle of 01'52'35' an arc distance of 372.03 feet; thence North 00'02'16' West a distance of 251.51 teet; thence North 61'42'59' East a distance of 258.92 feet; thence South 89'44'03' East a distance of 56.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. - . . _ \le . . . . • N.• 5. :'C • Itir r. ' CO Li?.,. UST• =Jr' _•'._,_ pL: �-O?J 0 Li I Id iti 12' *.". i [/.pip, �++ ? ii I , ppp i' ; -j KI • . Lj __;% ' .`e / 7t01\111 LEP ' t: : •a E2HIBIT B •1• legal Description: "F.VA PARCEL" Parcels 1. 2. 3 and S -. :K PARCEL 1: _ That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township �, 23 North. Range 5 East. M.M.. in King County. Washington. and • of Clock 14. C. D. Hillman's Eatlington Gardens Addition to the ' City of Seattle Division No. 1. according to the plat recorded •"` in Volume ri of Pals. Page 71. in K.rre County, washington. and •' of vacated streets and alleys, described as follows: �';R . Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quartet of '• said Northeast Quarter: thence North B9'44'31' West, a distance of 1260.41 feet more or less to a point on the easterly margin r' of pilmary State Highway No. 5. as recorded in Highway Plats -?. Volume 2. Pages 186. 187 and 188; thence South 01.33'19• West. along said easterly margin, a distance of 90.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence South 89'44'31' East. a distance of 333.74 feet; thence North 38'46'3S' East. • distance of 216.8E feet; thence North 01'33'19' East, a • distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 69.28'13' East. a distance • of 24.00 feet; thence South 00.31'47' East. a distance of • 138.38 feet; thence South 26.53'16' West, a distance of 383.18 feet to a point of curvature on the northerly margin of primary State Highway No. 2-SR No. 405; thence going in a northwesterly • • t t direction along the northerly margin of said highway on a curve to the left whose center bears South 38'S6'S7' West and a • R radius of 288.80 feet. an arc distance of 145.97 feet; thence d4 North 80'00'41' West, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point of ': curvature; thence going in a northwesterly direction on a curve 1 , to the right, whose center bears North 09'59'19' East. and a radius of 109.20 feet. an arc distance of 155.46 fees; thence U.i,1h 86'26'41' West, a distance of 6.00 feel to a point on -"� said easterly margin of primary State Highway No. S; thence North 01.33'19' East along said easterly margin • distance of ,- = 82.97 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ..'? PARCEL 2: •1 That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19. Township -'1- - 23 North. Range S East. W.M.. in King County, Washington. and y = 0 of Blocks I1. 12. 14 and 1S, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of beattle uivision No. 1, according to .i the plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats. Page 74. in King ,..a--• .w ;y • �_ - . . ,. „ii-------------- .- M '. .{. - .♦ a . I alm • • le O IV fl fili U 1 14iu8/ ,) >„;-, ,1_F; /ZIITV)P' Asa R : .44•:, • County. Washington. and of vacated streets and alleys. described as follows: ?.f-• Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quartet of .n said Northeast Quarter; thence South 01'04'08' West. along the easterly limits of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 224.15 feet; thence South 55.03'12' Last. a distance of 45.44 feet; thence North 89'44'03' West. a �_c distance of 56.01 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 89'44'03' West. a distance of 658.99 feet; a thence South 3562S'31' West. a distance of 269.74 feet to the northerly margin of primary State Highway No. 2-SR 405; thence • along said northerly margin South 40'02'41' Last. a distance of `� 55.00 feet to a point of curvature; thence going in • -:4.-• southeasterly direction along a curve to the lett whose center •=:E'° • bears North 49'57'19' East and a radius of 390.80 feet. an arc .g,,1 distance of 340.81 feet; thence South 00'00.41' East a distance : :- of 4.27 feet to a point of curvature; thence going In a northeasterly direction along a curve to the left whose center ':• bears North 05°45'30' West and a radius of 11.360.00 feet. an ?;-;' • arc distance of 254.83 feet; thence North 00.0:'16' West. a distance of 251.51 feet; thence North 61.42'59' Lest. 258.92 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. fi,' PARCEL 3: '�- ' o' ' That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section B. Township 23 North. Range 5 East. W.M.. in Ring County. Washington. and , -, of Blocks 12. 14 and 15. C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens '._" Addition to the C°ty of Seattle Division No. 1. according to �n . the plat recorded :n Volume 17 of Plats. Page 74. in King •. County. Washingto. . and of vacated streets and alleys. ;,•'_ •_ . described as follows: '• -L Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of . said Northeast Quarter; thence South 01'04'08' West along the easterly limits of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast 3-` .• Quarter. a distance of 224.15 feet; thence South 55.03'12' j•r'P , East. s distance of 45.44 feet: thence North !4.44'0l' west. a ,i- ': distance of 575.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 00'31'47' West. a distance of 249.90 feet; thence South 89'44'31' Last. a distance of 25.00 teet; thence North .`•- 00'31'47' West. • distance of 125.00 feet: thence South 89'28.13' West. a distance of 246.56 teet to the Northeast coiner of the above described parcel no. 1; thence South A. 00'31.47' East. a distance of 138.38 teet; thence South �-= 26'53'16' Wear. a distance of 383.18 feet to a point of "R`' curvature on the northerly margin of P.S.N. No. 2-SR 405; ; thence along a curve to the right whose center bears South %at • - • i • • 1 ch. • • y- le ( L \J/ , 0 `J 0.., M SFr,, #',,.H . /AIN! DF PT 38'56'57' West and a radius of 280.80 feet. an arc distance of :•X- SS.46 feet; thence South 40.02'41' East.-a distance of 95.00 -:,4, - feet to the most westerly corner of the above described parcel _.. ,,t so. 2; thence North 35'25'31' East. • distance of 269.74 feed thence South 89'44'03' Last, a distance of 140.00 feet. more or ';• less to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL Sr . That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19. Township 23 North. Range 5 East. N.N.. in Ring County. Washington. and Blocks 12. 13 and 14, C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens ice: Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1. according to -4 '• the plat recorded in Volume 17 of Plats. Page 74. in Ring .-- County, Washington. and of vacated streets and alleys. mx' described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northwest Quarter of '; said Northeast Quarter; thence South 01'04.08' West along the • easterly limits of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast • = Quarter a distance of 224.15 feet; thence South S5'03.12' Last a distance of 45.44 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence �. ,•,i: North 89°44'03' West a distance of 575.00 feet: thence North ri 00'31'47' West a distance of 249.90 feet; thence South . .4.':; . 89'44'31' East a distance of 25.00 feet; thence North 00.31'47' �'• '' west a distance of 125.00 feet to the Northeast corner of the above described parcel 3; thence along the north line of i;_;; parcels 1 and 3 South 89'28'13' west a distance of 270.56 feet _ to the Northwest corner of the above described parcel 1; thence , i along the westerly and northerly line of parcel 1. South e.. • 01'33'19' West a distance of 40.00 feet; thence South 38'46'35' Nest a distance of 216.68 feet: thence North 89'44'31' Nest a distance of 333.74 feet to a point on the easterly margin of primary primary State Highway No. S. as recorded in Highway Plats Volume 2, Pages 186. 167 and 188: thence North 01.33'19' Last. ? • ' along said easterly margin, a distant, of 230.99 feet more or .,::, less to a point on the southerly margin of road known es Black -„• River Junction - Renton Road, as described in Auditor's File '��' No. 2910406: thence along said read a distance of 90.78 feet to 'r a point on the southerly margin cf 'econ_a:y Statc Highway Nu. :_'-. ,_ 1-L (Grady Way), (Black River Junction - Renton Road) as •i-• described in Auditor's File No. 2910406; thence North 77'29'03' �r•.t` East. along said southerly margin, a distance of 913.17 feet to a point of curve: thence-continuing along said southerly ' ,•' — ryin, on • curve to the left having a radius of 3670.00 feet. m -• an arc distance of 756.18 feet: thence South 01.04.08' West a :�.:- distance of 839.vt feet to the North line of the South 60 feet ;•'• ,; of the North 214 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast €`�' - s4r• •, Quarter of Section 19, as conveyed to the City of Renton by •A`-,.; "I'. • . . i . • jr-------....-------.•-----.. . . I . . • . .• 1 s . •., , . - • • , , • • - • • 4•'• )"^ . --4. ' • - . .••--I I k;• . • .. • . . . - . - • • . ,.'-: _•67 '• — • . _ ..ciaa •e —• 4,7 i 41 • -.• 7., •• . . • IP - - 411 4t. I , .:".-7.. . , ND • t.; . •, • ..: 4111 -4 • ... ---1! '..t... :I§ ••• "4 1.k. .V.... .•is „... deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5475310; thence North , r 894403 Nest a distance of 372.42 feet; thence South -' 74.. 010408' West a distance of 54.71 feet; thence South 55•0312' East a distance of 9.31 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; ‘,.... EXCEPT portion deeded to the City of Renton by deed recorded .'.' under Auditor's rile No. 5475310. ,.' .. , . ve. ) ... li1--, "`" ,J, I--- 1 i-;"=" .... i, 11 Li ( f) i141;-)8/ J 1 ! 7.1:1....; ....1 .4Y :IF, ..1 /ZON!NG DrPT . • i 1 - ... a f i ra ••• I • •:.., i : .7c 4 ,t 1 r • , .....•,--• . . LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' • ' w 1110 • "TALBOT PARKING AREA" .That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County Washington; that portion of Blocks 11 and 12 of C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74 and vacated streets and alleys attached thereto and that portion of Block 5 of Renton View Addition as recorded in Volume 33 of Plata, Page 25, records of King County, Washington, more particularly described as' follows, Commencing at the northeast coiner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence .S 01 04'08" W along the east life of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89 44'02" W, • a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 61 42'59" W, a distance of 258.92 feet; thence S 00 02'16" E, a distance of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State . Highway No. 1, Jot. SSH No. 2-24 to Jct. Psh No. 2 in Renton (also known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest revision being November 7, 1986; thence easterly along said margin the following courses, S 89 49'09" E, a distance of 16.61 feet to a curve having a radius of 11360.00 feet and having a radial bearing of S 07 07'42" E; thence easterly along said curve through a cen ral angle of 1'39'52, an arc distance of 330.03 feet; thence N 00�23'00" E, a distance of' 325.43 feet to a point on the south margin of Renton Village Place (60 feet wide) as conveyed to the City of Renton under King County Recording No. 54753101 thence N 89°44'02" W along said south margin, a distance of 117.79 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. �r._•J� �3+• h�.�: Y E N d O N C. , ) r Isr t.irj 1 4i9c�7 • BU D r `._y / ZON!N j DEPT. EXHIBIT C 8-31-87 87021 I ,, . .----____-_,-- ______-- .. --- _ ----:-- ----:>-.- 1 \\ \.--) i 1 ! . . _... ........ ... --; 4. I . - - ___,•?c• ,e--.\-. 1 1 i . .. • 001 ; ,, I z'INII 16,;' -- 79 - 19----------(f7- 5\-- CM . CO C-z, ..----) LU CV) Cr. , 1 • . •• E. -\ . 1 1;.,E._2} v---1 r<I • • ,-. -.., TON VILIAGE CENTER 1 1 • ' .f; I . c..-. • „,......,.. .,,„______. 4.0-,-. ... , ____,z. c) ....,.. . . — -- -N • I . . • rt* . 4... , . .. ......_ iv 1 ... .. —.r N r ! I 11 • 0 • r....„Phoj,. N ! H H >4 N k LI11 ril .,--: •t.- N.... VILLAGE.PLACE OD ! eir° •• 4 EVERGREEN 41111*." - f-- — . . ! Km ,. m N r 4• TRLSOI *00 VW- is N .07 di L.- _ \ NUE I. \ \ I 3 00 ‘ ..1.1 ...,, 0- ' \ - ' didds N ONE RENTON PLACE , RENTON VILLAGE—C1NEMA— ---7---N L.. N irk:J TALBO AREA . N . ' '• \ ------L-1----L-i—— _ _ i '1All _ . - • \ , Ilk A . N 1 . OPP..... • A '• ' _-- - - -- - - --- • N • '''.:, 1 MO --- ---- 11 N ".: E to kljigllk I'...21:0-.0. •'• .4) 1.......‘..:_ri_n_Li_. -1 it 14 - - •-----;L__.,,,,,,7.7-.--7,. - , . . - .._. .. ... ,.... . PARTIAL REN1DN VILLAGE SITE . ,....___............ , N ',` I s ITY OF RENTC1 FILE NO(S): SA-io3-61 0 ® BUILDING &' ZONING DEPARTMLNT mo-en biLL NrV MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those Items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT 1 I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES Renton Village;Associates _ - -- - - - - - Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) _ADDRESS 6.07 Third Avenue, Suite -315. d SPECIAL.PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEiVORARY PERMIT* Seattle, Washington 98104. C] DITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE g C n J SITE PLAN APPROVAL S3Ers - 206 -682-68.68 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: 4. CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE* . From Section: - NAME ` - - 1 * Justification Required Brian C_loepfil, The Callison. Partnership, Ltd. ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: '1423 _Third Avenue'; #300 Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, Washin_gton .98101. • I:: PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT 206-623-4646 [] WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: Renton Village Associates ' ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: . 607 Third Avenue #315 Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP 1=1 FINAL Seattle, Washington 98104 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 06-682-6868 C] Residential El Industrial El • Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: I PROPERTY ADDRESS Q TENTATIVE 25 South Grady Way, Renton, Washington Q PRELIMINARY EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING FINAL Cinema B-1 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: • Expansion of Cinema from 3-Plex to -8-Pl ex NUMBER OF SPACES: ® ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE O C •• SQ. _FT._ ACRES TOTAL FEES 7Q�� AREA: 335,033 `sq.ft. 7.6913 �mju 1ooupL(,(�, . 011., f?^ ,,,,,,T,ATAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE TAM _ APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: 1• r' • , - Li.:.9` APPLI TION DETERMINED TO BE: L�:�_: r.vt; 3 1 V t� j._ tij : Accepted ,` Incomplete Notification Sent:On.-- c By: CU!LDING/ZOMNG DEPT. - (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: . APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: _ � � 2 I /1 /8 Q Accepted J QIncomplete Notification Sent-.On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: EJBuilding 2f Design Eng. ® Fire Parks Police Egf Policy Dev. ® Traffic Eng. Utilities --- ....] REVISED 1-31-84 -. - Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). See attachment #3 • AFFIDAVIT I, fiiWPJ a/.0& z, , being duly sworn, declare that I am ®authorized representative to act for the property owner,EDa =c4=t pr 7dAvelvsd -in=tiAs^appiteaFtforf and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE� ME THIS K_ DAY OF �U(�e;/1 �1��4/' 19 81 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT fi a e of Notary Public) (Signature off) Brian C. Cloepfil /0.Pa , _ tJ4- 1423 Third Avenue (Addy s) (Address) PW-tri-tf(--65)L 97.6, 5/a9/g Seattle, Washington 98101 (City) (State) (Zip) 623 - 4646 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION SITE PLAN APPROVAL LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: I. Application and Affidavits of Ownership (7 copies) 2. Project Description (7 copies) 3. Legal Description and Area (7 copies) 4. Environmental Checklist and Attachments (7 copies) 5. Mailing Labels of Adjacent Properties and Postage (I copy) 6. Vicinity Map (7 copies) 7. Site Plan (7 copies + I reduction) 8. Survey Plan (7 copies + I reduction) 9. Aerial mapping - 7 (7 copies + I reduction) 10. Landscape Plan - I0A w/attached site equipment (7 copies + I reduction) Site Shadow Studies/Section - 10B (7 copies + I reduction) I I. Floor Plan (7 copies + I reduction) 12. Building Elevations w/attached roof equipment (7 copies + I reduction) 13. Building Section (7 copies + I reduction) 14. Traffic Analysis (7 copies) 15. Preliminary Soils Report (7 copies) 16. Site Acoustics Survey CT'r' OF F ENTO'.1 P-9 ii NOV 23187 13U:'L D NG/ZOP,i;NG DEPT. bc/st97 The Callison Partnl lip CM( D iVO V 2 31997 U I DI!\fG/ OI1� 1J l �1iJ To: 6,K l_eviayv Date: § Transmittal 0067 Zer /A '� /Project No: 457 7 0 Memorandum / Re: H.I . C/4fQq &riert-A/At; / We are sending you ,Attached ❑Under separate cover the following: )(Prints ❑Originals 0 Submittal 0 Samples ❑ For your: 0 Information and use 0 Review and comment 0 As requested Action required: As indicated 0 No action req edFF 0 For signature and return — it47V i' ' 7Xr" � -c tszvrs '6/- 40, 0/1- <-n1 L/N& - ir-e,) 22T fv.r-rm-cr 7&. Crir gelViaw /1 /z- P1 / 7P"/ztY4t- /_Z. G. /Z&-Y_!_ v_ ( ) Df APIs elP -- h /3 By. - cc: If enclosures are not as noted kindly notify us at once. Architecture 1423 Third Avenue (206)623-4646 A Professional Service Corporation Programming Suite 300 Planning Seattle,Washington Interior Design 98101 '�•' . i'g 4,fy'•}t '?§ S,f.• 4r 1r \i- �t 1`1.Y. 1'' z, �t� e} .. 4 ' M +: Szi x. r y�xi M1�t. ? +[L;!' bw '4Y'W r- :-re,4�' 1ti v •r: .. 1 a, ri [. 'T r »•y :::?, \ .1 z f.i LI- 't ,-ff'c,+ r 1 L• +ay. h tt ri J IS S ''...)Yl S.. 4 Sy V'tia.K -" ''- f`3.< \ X'y ."41 •-i7 ;' } ti r` ' e' h h } .-r.xr�:. S" ti iT_»L $ • � j'' 4e..fti..` t h 74•"7, . ,.s„'117- * w' l.. Y:-.:,,• 1. ..:..1 f'v\•. , , .l 1' _ tJ `t i s Je.-A, •i R r ,•V.:. .& 1/ ,,1•Lir .F'�a,J 'Mal '.-.(, .j { , , u XC t s 1t i 1 w t 1 ,r 21 7 t ,1 ) " +. 5 1 ,'d' 1 , ,•7 ."^ ; ,y p (dam,/`.•a( ;l 1.1?`a4r`�4 r 1 ,,�, Fr at •+ y `, ' 1' • .'-- ' L�� y'�y -'', S"t'. c"F�1 • +Y 7?::,1Y i Y�`' i 4. J x ,L r A�.�J►`-C. *ems.. r . s. t f'SI .,Y r 4-, .i.4 t.`'ti; h.r i; 7' ts.• \ t'`.' :,,��i 4.F try r y R,.,,x ; '.,v.., ATTACHMENT # 1 KING NO EXCISE TAX Filed for record at the request of: AUG211987 Elizabeth Fitzhugh Q Cohen & Kaplan g 12-'+0�.50.077 J 2200 Fourth Avenue Ij o C' Seattle, Washington 98121 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED N THE GRANTOR, Michael Sandorffy and Henrika Sandorffy, phusband and wife, as nominee, for and in consideration of TEN . 1-1 . N AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable V) • • C) consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to Renton • GO Village Associates, a Washington general partnership, consisting of Michael Sandorffy and Henrika Sandorffy, husband and wife, • ft Morris D. Muscatel and Cynthia Muscatel, husband and wife, and Di J I— Michael Goldfarb, as his separate estate, the following }'"• I described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of ~+. - Washington: • '� See exhibit A attached hereto and 1.1J ko incorporated herein by this reference. F- Together with and including all fixtures and improvements owned by grantor and located • thereon. Subject to the matters set forth in exhibit B • attached hereto. DATED this 20th day of August, 1987. 87,08 21 � #3523 8 RECD F 1_•00 CASHSL ***11.00 t. kill,JP ii- Ni• -Ca"t>. , E ® �u� � 0 R Michael S•n.�:r£fy • i NC1V 231987 ,...4. , .c, Henrika Sandorffy •• ap BUILDING/ZONING DEFF. � � I 2038F - 1 - 3 ..3:x12.+'1i: yA " 4:14. - 'rY 'r[,y,)...,1` Z iS'`•t. :St« a ,.y`S.'� vtIVA • c 1 r, ;N fie-,V*"C a f`x4 -.4 'a4'ic. ✓i 'a� i e►T w--.f0 „54.,.rit- 1... .e.'{-•-J ..04.,,.,Jv..* "';y rt ?\A .. ..-.t ,,n zy yF.7�s' to ,a' 1 nC' , 'iit m.ej.s-"Fr .'b'Fv '�1�{ we•: ..w 1'r'i �1� tr • q {,.-.. ,..;v +-,K u , r Y«c. a' 4""' 4 .sw/c'"K'a 1 �i y ;,h��'..K� �,.iM�Y '�'�y,'�n'- r '3��5 f .1r fJ , 1,"�p ttl}�7n:`` , ..;.,,,r� +r.-a,:.j.'I+r,..t'�. ,-, t .,p. a j*:„.... ,tS`�r• y ,:,,,. ,e 1 y, 3 • x. �S W ..1 a�.. „0, � sif{'r 'i:T:.l,-...„ c ifv„ ., '+' ,t+.,f ,,.•,, .✓„'.,, l-s �'w,y'''#�v)s +t-7 -, x h'` -'' • ; �•• y,W,54,.. 'r^k.e �...1....i a..,,".-.'-., ,7 .;a a't� rrs! ; J 7��, ('� 4.*A`. c - t•r.�.rk-ice \ t `+. ayi1' -r..r ,r ._ `- c „ , rt yam,. �, �5tom"4 .c'\r 4C ter 1 l7}?' .Y aY .Ti."."'„^'. sl!.}4'•c t 4 4'•e.,.. ir2 ..". ,,..n,il� —. •.+ ,, A .4 ,, e�l r r ^M [� .7 , n.. i',..,-.,V.'o.., "a.,, a.:Y.r f, o t t Rr •• ILLL --t• r f„f— •�L �Se •„'•c '.t E•st • •,M., 1,Y)FYt 'R a•'' !,r A U G 211987 r :s'?' S Hn g A ^ �. "�.4qe„ >, St:.r• s�,1 w r r r>ir }.t•+ ,R, "• Or 1�V•Il. r„a�_ >� Z'y ��a` �� 1^ys�7�'+`�s 1.1. i 1•+' '7 t.. t �z, t�Yqx • y•z+�t r •� 'n >"'" tf t` .5'r ii• 5t/;a'�t.,, 1. , ,'yt �•r s` }i+a.� r �,f`[a n te6,7*; aT SFY �--y^�'r '..r r 'C? Yl ' �• - .a. ....9 r y �1 � 3 ti,,p,,r+i : a t , `f," F 1 t.';•z;1a1* n. .r'ir si {�. )"�7 �, .r f� v+ rt? `c �1 �, } i rt �t ,F. 4 F •1`� r rr ...K ti ,ir tf y A�;�� rc yrZcs,L d r kr 'y ') 0. t) _ - r Yr nt •i ti � ; t a7 Yr .' to / i t ��JY • N � is • r ? ,�^'+ "' r 1 x Y y , �� r i l ^'tf • { f .. y t t '> 'f h Nt �r.. t t i 1 ) t.7• r"� 7 r t•+ 1�' G 77 _ ' �. t r ti .T S Ste` �.,-5•x 1 3k�.. ti{� �t „t.. x .a�"t r.,.1�. sff •a y t f+•:? F 'S } • l :, � .1ti A'V fi.- c.~...." r1x �.: ,• ..r bil t7 J y, u•'�"`` 7._ • • • • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I CERTIFY that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Michael Sandorffy signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. • • ATED: i �./9 '7 CJJ • • Signature of Notary Public�ic Title:/lja�.4�..'er"/2dl,{'7�� •` My Appointment Expires: /--� • Chi STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) 0 EN. I CERTIFY that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Henrika Sandorffy signed this instrument and acknowledged it to • be her free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED: Signature of Notary Public^^ /1 Title: 17,42t C ti� 4 /IlCC_G, z,,,c My Appointment Expires: • • • 2038F - 2 - • ¢'ram' .4•t::l� •e .y.. x ,,,i F •u - r i r'Sy .+ �" �' 'k. i M1, .{h +f r Y 1a ' 5'+•-•w • 3afl��r• WwS"d' 'fit '1'r� +f"' � a:y�i? �i,v �rM4F {rrs�'j•i.'»�i fit''4 ,�-��,.s .� '''�"�?Yt c .t• ' E »"•' i:� � � M, 7t3 Y"`b-r s+. `a�" 'ryei2�'i. •t.ems.>t� �t�o. 7. �. �+ri�,.,s, -� Syr ,1 ,,,, r.y+ s r M a .+t'3 H C.-c.�.�- '�7r +Ga.n"'% ^Fe''t� cv, * b� by t "1�11 r �i • � "yF^.g�, �� „� ,�,r� ••7 ,,, s'•t i a+iy� c..) 7.�z6f't"lt _ "a-a13. •'iiSl Y' r''w:. 4 LLu...y�`"ra'i +�i^�.`�� t-•C• t • 3y} 11 41',�• `'�' i"' .3 y 17'kF'�L <Ll r '�y�•i „y k"'"•�n 3 .a•e. i'x•�a.�r f-i .� •' �i.r'{ 1 �. . :. Y ,r4+.'� lK?,�,5''• na" x...•-. __n —L. • 4? .L )n.l.Y=• �'S -a r +�JteL�,� c.{?,^,y�,, r •r��:A 1�...er; 'r ' 'Syt 'tr; � >^ ti. a'�cs .^" 4" Ra„ry�}r'/'�' ��(■y w`��yy� et�K}, �+`* ...nWF,�N....;.9�,a,Y[r�{rj�"'��nfi yt�RC.s•..�'�w.�'r � +a"� M 1 Y 1 h ° t '�"i�t ycF'�r."3v' r' f�"�i ri.,J, / : ••"rirA�y R _' •ii*;• KY* yr" tJ'`, '4Ni ' , {rif' �'S`� .} ,� N t r ,. .h ,.. s . � S t —•4y ` k` -. ljl' .�', r+�' t 7:t.jc Y, '.':„(t ' --• y, H r" ►1% 4!a x 3i�l.'r �� the`v w-:".r N� y i, 4.-,<,-. �• h ,1.i ✓Jr r -r(a-�r�J4t 4 ��r"h k -,1-i :�,��'t`.ice ,oc . L 4 b.6 itt.4,tri F4.�•*.qr*P a 1 7 ' .l ;r yw t ;-y` r y SN iF f 5� L , i� `• '7, t,-V1« , UA D" i �n i t6 r i i1 5 Zl t .s r a; .r ., µ. v ....tfi c 4• ? +f F, ti ' ',. Atk r h '' t )i /a if' r ; fr r 4 s ,� y •h tt lr N. rf ' ,'�, t i9 )' �ti tf +u ' ill r r �,t) in tt r f1 ' ° !S1x, �' ^ ! tlrvf.ljy ..��1�� I �4 I . • ;.t • - f a. i f f '' I' t+ ,- r. d�• r 0:. 1 'r .. rw+r,.• 5 -'1.',.t 4. f 2k; �� 1!4 t 1.;. 1.4 .,1 r l" 7f;t 1,i"t f ! " 'Lr 'tiw., .. a ' ` 1 1 a1 r .it 1 .!, t.^ iTN r J t..l` t E rr'r„x r h^y.� x a+.� i>• J a� ."'7� r 5 `" t r 1, ,x`-1,,,,,,,--...-,. .3 i.5„ i -r•-' 3. �`-.5•A * r. .! ,f f A f i. r4 }i,. f ! t V� .v y.., L ,�•y � 1 '3'. ,£t• 3+-t.,y l7 ".� ra n r,ril 4 Vi c. r +4 !1'.:..:- i e ...h)- '.= ,u H ';' ;' u f �d'ii,_ .5'12 r x. r:�.r... 4. �Y{ y . f r2,*7 K 4'' �' 1 �� 1^.rx-- ,k' Y1 S• 31;. -. ,:ct4t r C,... ,•t, .�• ✓ 'fit �rvr1' `3 s G," o� t-_ .�„ / v` ` a r. *`r 1; �, '' �t_• : X 'S� 11 n F.. }s ) i�4 `2�'l T y.t} T•i, 4 �•. -?fi <P2 - sy� a. -5 a IS,.,-� '''''..7* 4'� y ;L r•4, -j.! 1F '''. j (i Ts�r e'J-•'sh Jl\-- x� ti ., , ,'"``.... . ,�. i.•.1..+.. " f...3�''N'' ,S .-- .... • ,' . TyYHIBIT A ` The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: • That portion of Blocks 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, C.D. Hillmans Earlington Garden Addition Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH vacated 94th Avenue South, vacated 96th Avenue South, vacated 9th Avenue South, vacated 9th Place South, vacated 10th • Avenue .South and the vacated alleys between 9th Avenue South and 9th Place South and also between 9th Place South and 10th Avenue South, • all vacated under Ordinance 2051 of the City of Renton and that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, more particularly . described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said • CI northeast quarter; N thence south O1°04'08" west along the east line of said southwest 0 quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; CD tD thence north 89°44'02" west, a distance of 18.28 feet to the true • N point of beginning; . 00 thence south 61°42'59" west, a distance of 258.92 feet;:1 C thence south 00°02'16" east, a distance of 248.94 feet to the P. northerly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. SSH No. 2-M to -I GO Jct. PSH No. 2 in Renton (also known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest revision being November 7, 1986; thence westerly, northwesterly and northerly along said margin the . following courses: north 89°49'09" west, a distance of 44.72 feet; thence south 83°23'09" west, a distance of 82.06 feet; thence north 89°54'45" west, a distance of 241.66 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of north 17°05'13" east; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of • 32°52'06", an arc distance of 224.19 feet; • I thence north 40°02'41" west, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 288.8 feet through a central angle of 39°58'00", an arc distance of 201.45 feet; .I thence north 80°00'41" west, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 109.2 feet through a central angle of 81°34'00", an arc distance of 155.46 feet; • .1 (continued) • ?".y6:•s�py-�,y,� i :., vt;..".+�•7y '4,� "hY V.. .'"r. Y X • 1r J :,, C t5 )4: F in' i i'^,:,T' •4. N'2' r`t. 'c •vi}`'gall' C',r. vd`xs'. ','a(_ec 4a"v-,.S.t j' rr-eS2 •.s •;'1,,,;_,;.,,„..;.,.....,,,,.•'-, ;., :a+ _�,Yc �'iei y,:, '}"'s Y "„<„. .y 7Cr'at. ?.n c.f t.ii R.�",?1,,,,z-4. x.'. r� 7.r�` 1= s� ,..�kr p. � .iA� R�'A'i.. ?"g`�2' ^•r t ••.*y. c r ,.+i rq„ l�d t�.Trr. t,.� � ^�J,i�, dl"7 u.`T",...{�"�-,s+_S.�.,c;IC. ✓n�.,r"Sf �„j'c y, F6� j1. `c,�{t{.�t,�d''�.Mx'��t>C .Ti.- 1 .�x.} +, �f,-r` -a Y y "). rr�r t •3; zeta, :? �i 5'S.t,. sw=o,.ir x .d j T�7,..c�c`°? a.�,�,'.`5"v �,: .r.ems- Z'4'-✓"., . .: ‘s `�.'./1,..4 rn' rye►/ /`1'�q1 '1B By Y+r,l f,'K-M .. }•rt ".wa.'-•�Siss , 1 z •..L L .rc,. y'T aJ? >r k" �2••+ [t { f t.y _ G F l'cyF- '''." ' { ! �1F.J s �`'1.}Gxc .:1-1.-' , r t -� .s t., y :71•t 's i L nvriY-- 4, ;Ss yy,471t d..s�,({�!r • .t' �^-fi ��r.:. f + r h.,�•,J r a l..H F T. i� , i �'L r L��+^r�`s M.^.*- \�1l1� " Tt.--r'�•. �{�'� 1 -+ J^ it41Z ,e f e� ,':.:7`x ,, t t u s,..;e:-: E;(:-';2:-: ,'‘,.; -ti-�;7:1,,rr �' F'- a' } 3 a. f. J .�, . .;.•�.i t �� C S f, 4� by f.L I: s A y,../, 0.:-.‘.,. i r y, ;ttuw t t HS ..` ;.t.1 h.P l .M 5.. t/ ICit ;,` y Y c`j� 4.cr te.,. J1. !A hr if.h t t I ., „.l b♦- �u �M. C c :{C* ♦l�} ,... .+~ f i y� Y ..+Y fr' - _ z r ? tiR'h; r1Y ..tUt•J. `1Sl� .{�'�' tr. .,xk•'-< � 3`"� Y r � X Y } , < r 4 t }'� � •• *f t 'r't.1 i?"' �.ps ?, ,a ,lc r y., ±I t t r 1 ( aT J t „�lYi± : t •t t r in!..!,4' �r"-`f -r• °r s3 i if t!'}`�i'` '�,- 3.4.--1-„...,,,,....,..-! rti ,, r.t F 1, 'e tom' 1`,,, }' .c 4 ., e•'3 4,01 t ,,7fi• 7t i•••t ti -'r+ y ¢.44—: t,, T ,i, \Yy r..cd' re;....-, ,. z , t., 4 t.ri} rr L ,Fi a i ,;',„1,:...`-..' 'Ix -- , -s..'.k t 17; •1 in-. f - 1i ,, . :.-,- .. r fl: G • ... +,rti Y `4, .,.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION, continued: I thenc; north 88°26'31" west, a distance of 6.00 feet; thence north O1°33'19" east, a distance of 313.96 feet; thence north 41°34'50" east, a distance of 90.78 feet to the • southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway • 1 No. 1-L), being 100 feet in width as presently established; o thence leaving Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. No. 2-M to Jct. PSH No. 2 in Renton and along the south margin of said Grady Way North • 77°28'26" east, a distance of 912.78 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 3,869.71 feet through a central angle of 11°14'08" an arc distance of 758.84 • 0 feet to a point on the west line of land described in Exhibit "A" of • 0 Quit Claim Deed under King County Recording Number 8208270355; thence leaving said south margin of said Grady Way South 01°04'08" t•\j west along said west line, a distance of 840.76 feet to the north CC margin of said Renton Village Place as conveyed to the City of . O Renton under King County Recording Number 5475310; N thence north 89°44'02" west, a distance of 372.42 feet along the sr north margin of said Renton Village Place to the east margin of • vacated said 96th Avenue South; thence south 01°04'08" west along said east margin, a distance of •• 60.01 feet to the southwest corner of said Renton Village Place; • thence north 89°44'02" west, a distance of 48.26 feet to the true • • point of beginning. EXCEPT That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township • 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, and that • portion of Blocks 13 and 14, C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division Number 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, page 74, in King • County, Washington, and vacated streets and alleys attached thereto, described as follows: • Commencing at the southeast corner of the northwest quarter of said northeast quarter; • thence south O1°04'08" west along the east line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence north 89°44'03" west, a distance of 18.28 feet; thence south 61°42'59" west, a distance of 258.92 feet; thence south 00'02'16" east, a distance of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State Highway Number 1, Jct. SSH No. 2-M to Jct. PSH No. 2 in Renton (also known as State Road Number 405) as • approved October 31, 1961 - the latest revision being November 7, 1986; ' thence westerly, northwesterly and northerly along said margin the following courses: .P (continued) • .3 { I •Y . .� r Y ivc 7c'X.e'tc y�•t' &...s1'•.h,.. :,.6^"r'3"+'F -w.- i :•'f'+�� 52xt .� ,� r YT�r"t an..,-t\:'•.tr>,7:-,..41•=``f,c ss i ti:"i.,t'y L ^'L kF"`..Gf f�f5... ��•-`>Syl3x•^�'i°�. '"f�N. i'Su "lt,:+�tY*�`.'+• .stfr`�'�,.��'t..'��"h+MSiE �+P!`=". �;�.v„I��i ,r rr g7r'i F'�� F� a1 ' 4✓ $"s r��oyy.��.Cj 4.. p ,ve. �`��.�fi},,'y..n,.;•rc�-.a{h�" `w�_'�te'?,i- ,t,sc;r• ., .-t YT.:7- Z. ,ti ii.-.,� ch 1. - �-•� f �—"'k Pc _-. "' } l'Ce 1M..1 r'l�-v( 4 �y?. ~ �7`T f .d'� l.5"L� _-:rb v.y..Y '.—;.rz. .- ,'�.,. r'q. ,L'ti"+. r ,,..f' � � ,La\,..•. "� !'. .,.. l} 't, ;tr5d s� r^reJ a.tity- . .,r . ,yx 4 ..ar�L' . .,.. 1� ri. �ti�y,+ *..�y..V��jj, {�ry ..r�-�,�.150,.,hit-T 'F 4n `�.{ ;x "'O ,7.e: . "Ti"Y :1':% ,.y -..S $i. gym,, '+ar+ 'el '"�,?,rr'tr... :`• t .r t5 e'rl'^-,,ft.,.., t - 1X..�...�%' . f ILLY �7 I sly yI� L dc.'s-,-- �✓�Jx �tYY t a , r .. ,e t ` tr t�R v�,:z a1. A U G 211987 . ; - _ _ �;. �= M. ,. �=:1 ,,.;v . f�� ,� �� • t - ._nsy',.': �'•_ 4k.s?`••... _ i.'k`7.... ,.c.;...:14.4 .}"!ti3,. ,•�•:'£-may. " Cv w •., „;.4",...., -Cam K., :.iii«m ylk, r+. . MY'. ° :i;air ,1" Y� `" i { .4i h . wr' x ,. fait' hIt(,,,I c x r S0.+7'::•,,.}`"' . r '`ct� ^Y-o- f� - 'C3 L't}••,..f s t •,.. Its 1 1„�•. ,..1.),...„...,� x " 1 ', .� �� ,7'P �`'' r . ,•'if ,y t 'x ..r`�?+?.. .$ r•... e'- i:,; .1 y 4? Y�',?,r x F a'k 1,, ~ I C,i . < J^t w f. w KM1lY"�1-yew ''';- .i' • ^•t i, +�y. `r-2} ,I.Rt e. .ft `r•+" -' �4-'. Y j S i�, y'4 ,.4 0. ,.N 7�1., + .2.K•i> '. 4 v'> , �, � �� 1 r�•' �`f 1.F ' '� . •� � tt -r f" F/4 '4�'� 1�'^�< '�'n4 � • d r �1r f;'��. r I,J i,: r ra, f k r ,,y hxr,-Y :r 11 ti •0!h, :.. } .r �A tt••*s -; ?� fie}iA •Y-,.,', ` ry ��.:.4-7Y;�w,r1 �`xF }.{ r -S>• c ,EN so -� s a ,� x �f .. 4 ti. r Y. c t+ _\.J:rl .nrL- r.st,,t CY/ mo t. •-<!t) ^ r• t..:- r w��s t',•x ., 74 t• • c i �•t 1 f•'� t 1 a• r i 1 r ..t'•ti :..rrJ' t:•„- ,: 3� ••.•r.• r"•, y,�.r rr t i. rt s -.w` •-' -Y. 9-,./'na: �rrl',e.,- rs't. *),{k y_,- 1T ' .•• k•• . :t north 89°49'09" west, a distance of 44.72 feet; thence south 83°23'09" west, a distance of 82.06 feet; I thence north 89°54'45" west, a distance of 241.66 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of north 17°05'13" east; thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 32°52'06", an arc distance of 224.19 feet; • thence north 40°02'41" west, a distance of 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 288.8 feet ..• through a central angle of 8°00'02", an arc distance of 40.33 feet to the true point of beginning; • �„� thence continuing along said northerly margin and along said curve • N through a central of 31°57'58", an arc distance of 161.12 feet; Ln thence north 80°00'41" west, a distance of 100.00 feet; • p thence along a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 109.2 • ,-i feet through a central angle of 81°34'00", an arc distance of 155.46 N feet; 00 thence north 88°26'31" west, a distance of 6.00 feet; thence north O1°33'19" east, a distance of 313.96 feet; ��, • thence north 41°34'50" east, a distance of 90.78 feet to the southerly margin of Grady Way (also known as Secondary State Highway Number 1-L) being 100 feet in width as presently established; thence leaving Primary State Highway Number 1, Jct. No. 2-M to Jct. - PSH No. 2 in Renton and along the south margin of said Grady Way • north 77°28'26" east, a distance of 415.16 feet to the northwest • • corner of land described in Indenture of Lease Modification and Extension Agreement between Renton Village Company and Chevron • U.S.A., Inc., recorded under King County Recording Number 8412210417; • thence south 00°31'47" east along the west line of said land, a distance of 150.00 feet to the southwest corner thereof; thence south 03°18'52" west, a distance of 151.44 feet to a point on • the north line of vacated 9th Avenue South (Memphis Avenue) as shown on said plat of C.D. Hillman's Earlington Garden's Addition to the • City of Seattle, Division Number 1, said point also being the northerly prolongation of the east line of Lot 4, Block 14 of said • plat; • thence south 01°23'49" west along said northerly prolongation and east line, a distance of 166.01 feet to the north line of the ` vacated alley attached thereto; thence north 89°44'03" west along said north line, a distance of • 120.00 feet to a point on the northerly prolongation of the east line of Lot 33; Block 14 of said plat; thence south 01°23'49" west along said northerly prolongation and east line and the southerly prolongation of said east line a distance of 202.93 feet to the true point of beginning. • 0. mt/9506g .l • . { t^ °'"sY "r•as�-- ' t .f �.7 �.�S".I�AP_�T�.r"f.+�'•y4 'bs'a'ts rYi ''1 � a. ,N tt ..-``•N-t R .xt• s'#y<+jal<-s "C' T„ .t Y0 :•}• c c..l41;' , `t i' 141,Nkxr.e.,CVV.t`.t - :' t)}Y , 'G „.:/' ••4'-' li . •_ er K..... 1%-A• ,� :� 4 " 1t�'-;•:'r +r + : liyy .M,1 "4. .£"F � fi+r C`•n 4r.*4°M-..; 1 '¢J - 7 ' .PS ,7%:Z'' -K- y.7.24 � . Y` G hr ,.. s''x, - a- . . X *Vef1� *. a 1 kxs4 ,�.wY--c-Y4,":,s .,"1•ee .E - ' )Dib:f�._,^,•.K,fi�ry!♦ f!'1^ vll t .-,•t"�h.V� ;4.J Cy vS t'-'i' 1� x -r,' S y,- yy. 4...y • I-i-51 4r � pw- isA:1 "i1,0;o;)w ,:- .. v . iV_e".c4.-Z. .:'>�r .-. . '• 5w.f { :.r� i•- f '3 : •,?�fivuI l.h 1 . "� .c,t1, f't- r`- 1 -'� 4F+eiy 2 . ..4t rI' ,t j,•-q lte r Vt:' ;%_, "..v-4%. ar t '' ,A . .au,,,. ,11. * � • ' ?f ? D ". . i-1 .!5;•:; 1--- i,u y L'%4ZS'X wit.lK v i.-r'4, , ce" c a •,.._Al...-, j rS.i7 y *i 7. xyr . F .S: S •rtAy. r ,%tom + ii , • i..„ ,h 4,ac- /I y` K Si"''}3'' t.'."ri,lr'X'; 1, .x ,....,v. y .* i Y z?` .t rNp. toy ^ -y- 1. ID i,i. lri--Ya--x (�?-• ,w N•i+5 ,'. ♦h ., a ,. �fir- , t.,„ .+ r i i, ,, \,,, ,t parr ,, l.a3 .t° , i r ee? r 5+k4t'�,•{' •: �6v� �t.4} „r.-;w�,u vrx y`,iYi+ S r ..)-r�' '`tt -, rr r~ {r .'F',Y aS o...7 ,. ”.b t .11t ',..t. i.-.... .•. �y,�" T'f'-.Wi�= *'k '.•..- ;-.•� }2 3 Y ° 1rs+4 � ' - ti^ "k' ..s r£`.1 r+., yrNf r7 _', .•,�J�}'y�tS_'*"e3 i•" t .J.ax:e ill- x�Y,E 4.l . 4'V ."1'X ,-F `'33 A F t y, f11r t' 'r,'"'1••r r 41 r,,`, p i'�tT-yi t ,l 1;x1yi r t r r''Ff Le1.j,f`�•Tytr' 1 -Fr, ,t L ,i •: {.Z -,,� .1 ,1 W, °3 i .L s ,f .. '•RBI . `'rhiI j r, o Mi' ti� �.7.4 h��lFtri,'1 !�4 �r yJ ,;'tl,tL v... t` )�,!*t•.� r 1 �riG.�� } }j4}J.! !.:i r't. M.r4T -i"" Z" 1'-TLrJl *N, {K '�,.4;••' y • ,"'.1 4 V. ;: 1 .ir S r .r,-,, ' ,-1 1 Lt,• •1'4+ h11'} o S-A.Y { ti t :i ., r;� T l 'r •1• ,� n . '��.. ti : }i .� u 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: City of Renton PURPOSE: Sanitary sewer AREA AFFECTED: Portion of said premises RECORDED: March 20, 1970 RECORDING NUMBER: 6631804 . 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: CCI GRANTEE: City of Renton L7 PURPOSE: Construction, reconstruction, O maintenance, removal or relocation of , a waterline Q' AREA AFFECTED: O That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 X• North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington and of Blocks 11, 12, 14 and 15 of C. D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats,, page 74, in King County, Washington and of vacated streets and alleys, and of Block 5 of Renton View, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 33 of Plats, pages 25, in King County, Washington, lying within a strip of land 10 feet 7 in width having 5 feet of said width on each side of the following described line: , I Beginning at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 19; thence south 01°04'08" west along the east line of the southwest quarter of said northeast • ' quarter a distance of 6.26 feet; thence north 88°55'52" west a distance 100.95 feet to a point hereafter designated Point "A"; thence continuing north 88°55'52" west a distance of 110.00 feet; thence south 01°04'08 west a distance of 204.53 feet to a point hereafter designated Point "B"; thence north 89°44'03" west a distance of 101.00 feet; thence north 42°18'31" west a distance of • 477.48 feet; thence south 89°28'13" west a distance of 160.00 feet, to the true point of beginning; thence north 00°31'47" west a distance of 156.00 feet, plus or minus, to the south right-of-way - line of South Grady Way and terminus of said easement. • RECORDED: May 12, 1975 RECORDING NUMBER: 7505120351 • EXHIBIT B .>;--, :r A {'��2';h›..,. c�SY Sf',t.4.,;t �c-,64•c *. -is V-.4-• -2.7'';:.4''' 4-i.yr,.' ArtS•1 C 4� 1,-,..• <LCe• ` ' � ,'' • stria.. .r., -1S-S� f�'l 4-=% sr. .Jt ~V Ft4.,- Nt`�f.iry R j'11^I✓ , •-•--.• n F v, w ,4%;• �?:'}R:� '.S 2, 1 ♦ .F Yz .� 3. a��r K,y�^.�� 1.•+ F ,rr:'�..•�'..w t�+t,t4 N..`v �, e�" 3t,�t.y�,+.��rr"Ir�c.��, r:3,,,,�=*L � � C�+n�}1 M. ;4 �•.` t4. 4. +"Di °� „�., 3-1. • s ..*71 wC. --1.)‘.':,.�w.m+' i r rS..`.`vrii i:•tj?7• ,, 2/y0,.• . 4 ..s 'e 'ry e• r'4„4i 4 ~!r'"r^�' �t c`�i• �%.14S'": •� _,•i.'':,�r4Y :. r;; i ,Z 4-id' ;.,?? ��: '�A�'�"a.�;�r�'iC;i" '�'L�hti'9rld}"yr��p-y utM'J� � ..�GYy..'�'r` a.'a� E-� r��' 4�,. .n�:_ > ♦ r 6�j JD T7 i V' r t r 1 ,if'`t.' 4* a:-.";: r•*f W c;"S•?.'" •,A. ;.* � r ts�a'3.�! �.�. Y '�,.,, 'r^'�ir'4'�+.. n,,tr J,�, ali,a�2W:;t}c•-.+-.{i;;. �. r rr Y��Y� .f~ -`i� .� y, Yi7, •Ar r "�1,'4'��,,;i1T} rl t l ge:t$v�,t a ' h.J f1 c •ti 'i 1 4,j'�'7. 7,4 u r , -J• "':J s1i- &, t1� +Lr. 'i :,40:1- r t t� r ia� �• � b�F e k .!s '>rt r �[� �;4"�' /�: rn ^"`s•-``;�,r tY' t t-�.cx� , � , r r 2�' rr � r. a .. .r ��rie'. ,;,.`.'a. xi -.a , *C^ •!•, 1;!i. .A pe ri•L .4.1*i!i. � J '\. y w nt+ '1,L f t' c�-. � �' �� 1 .,c. [. �7'-Sy;r.+/y^+ �•'��L�44�R�~ r a;'`. y :,..� Z 'Yc `rr+ tw. 1r n ..... ?,..41'��; �/�/r'''}}��j� R S j:' sh •r,..."'o- �„ yy��++�� c`' .c-Y ,.s ; �S +. ., �bW B1 S� + f w",,t i1K.V�. G' ] -L �JJ� ` *`�f r...7 '�,r- tZ"i, „ * •+ r'� `+v e., r d ''S' r�4 L,,r fi r. AUG 211987 i. , � . . '•,A �� zr.� ��.t r•ari is " ' -'.V `�4 �C�.i it s�'xt�i { a� 'W''' S t y"t'j ' `. '' � �,+ �'T"'f' `" 'C ...iv ,i`a.�% •$...•-• rc••r,, {ktr ^ f a t �. t � 1. 4 4"�1 .t t ^1.7 �7'1 K^is N a..d! C t.F'N�GU t_.r''��7 y+4 x {'F rr`.T < 'Sy'l: vt. r. rt .i • + }ti+m`5 q/ i�+�_ t- '--u i�i W-t.;T.{'t7•- M... i/r+'l Nl'Y G,1. 'di It aV 5•� 1... / '.} } 1 �R'r 'dV•+F /Y{ �t -KZ.`. f(l {e Y�r JY{• 'yr}' ;,,.r4 . .> .7-,.. ,ul- .� �i.r 3 -x • •:. 0 ,t p,,C'"' _.• "a t n - .),ss *' 4 t tky^rt o,• ,4r((C 5. { F, ti.T �"1 14.1�.1V.i• t�ff�rc. f, }.�~ • " • +. J}l i. `;.rf (1�yl •<t.SIFT t't ty,s }!^.' � t r• {/`Dtl. At t! �t' f • I t (' r t l fl �'1 •t• F f r•r� 5 t ;d 7r 1 i,1 r =t; 1•1 "I ! r •I t 9 ry � y•5•*{- {a =� `r�J} r .,t• r S• 1 r A. r • t• N A�,� `A j .. L�•t .F✓� {. ; �, •t/ 1{• S �51 !� '1 >.. ti}. ay j w •-S , ,n -, E • tir 'n r n Z t J " r^•• tT +. • . S t w- ;t, r :r` y a f.• .7.{ r it l r - '� ^ 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Electric transmission and/or distribution lines . • AREA AFFECTED: As constructed RECORDED: September 21, 1979 L7 RECORDING NUMBER: 7909210721 • G 4. CONDEMNATION BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OF RIGHT OF ACCESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, BY DECREE: • Q ENTERED: August 21, 1962 j` CASE NUMBER: SC-588966 GO • 5. RELINQUISHMENT OF RIGHT OF ACESS TO STATE HIGHWAY AND OF LIGHT, VIEW . AND AIR, UNDER TERMS OF DEED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: • RECORDING NUMBERS: 5428436, 5440058, 5440059, 5443690. • 5484949, 5484950, 5484951 and 5496454 • 24. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: • GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company, a Washington corporation • PURPOSE: To construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace and enlarge an underground electric transmission and/or distribution system AREA AFFECTED: Said premises RECORDED: August 10, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8708100374 25. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: • GRANTEE: Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, a Washington corporation PURPOSE: Operating, inspecting, maintaining, 1 removing, repairing, replacing and • using a communication line with all connections and appurtenances thereto • AREA AFFECTED: Said premises • RECORDED: August 10, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8708100375 "' Rights of tenants in possession. Matters revealed by-ALTA survey. .; -2- i 711_ y +r� �.! rr F1r` ; w"•.c�� 3 y.. 'p � • '• ,.t �c.�Y� �'�^y`, r . i� -4 .rR4. J cc..* ?YS �rtoi� O .r,'•e -0Z vc to + #3��- d F r 2 ` e r1 ,?�j��, L._ 4+r•"' ,�i w 'r.'` '�-�,a"6'`Sio t `cti'+"t�s �, '.krd' s�->�r.•,Y� �'"",Ga'' " .,i P ' y � .. . rrf ' 9d�/ly.�' ti'r'�:K Y i a�`'i''{'e,2r4S#`r4t' 't .a. .;i�: $e�' `•,Y '4..a`� �ig'"i� 'S• ct"` .,y� :, �• +.�+a a ,tr ,.. �.+.�t-� ..'��.ia e r�.,5y fin, ` ..,�tiM-•,.er„ y „ ',.� + ti ''at,,,,�rt�,t -s'' w.{,�f',',r�•rr {�L'yt.TN'J u.C��h j,_:'*�''.,Ss,v,•t ''`.s� � .rr'.> ` .a '�^+ t...{-"�14 ti'� 7 rq-,0.''':�F'.iftP�' r..•/�,r• r' F''n}r`L'"`•""^°1i`r -' "''�` .�-t sar.,?r•''� ' S•`` ( /..�;c' —s t'.y�`. P. s• a 4�.' r ,+'' /-�'vfr. t-•,• " • • .`vW aF.T--i,x-i.ti1 .:r,•,. ,.My1i�' n,_h �k.yk`��FCSk, ri�'L�,sr yr�i'*i',.`?,.a«, •d s •l.a.•��r+pt t�;iy.�w' `i�`Lie-,.i•+i.'.eY.4C^fi.�vr r•.k�7 zrrJ•`',a�,,j"''yt-. t KY,;yt�.�y��p rt," •FRErn BT AUG 211987 . tyt, V r f" GtT• :A", ."ACHMENT #2 C;Tro :.NOV 23187 PROJECT DESCRIPTION RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION BUILDING/ZONING l'"PT A. The project consists of expansion of the existing three-plex cinema (20,000 s.f. and 1,405 seats), to operate as an eight-plex cinema by the addition of 16,253 square feet which will include 855 new seats plus a lobby and other general public areas. The expansion will require 214 additional parking spaces (855 seats at one parking space per four seats; Renton Code 4-2208,4) which will be provided through a joint-use agreement and easement on the property immediately adjacent to and east of the cinema which currently contains 220 paved and landscaped parking spaces. These adjacent spaces are now used for office parking for One Renton Place, however the cinema and office uses have dissimilar peak hours for parking (office: 7 a.m. to 3:30 and 5:30 p.m.; cinema: after 6:30 p.m. and weekends). This joint-use parking agreement has been submitted to the City of Renton for approval. B. The cinema expansion is expected to be complete the fall of I 988, subject to the timing of obtaining the necessary approvals and permits. Along with the site plan approval application, a lot line adjustment has been requested to modify the site's east boundary with the hotel, to establish direct lot access to S. Grady Way, and to conform the northeastern boundary to the location of a future public street. The Transpo Group traffic study attached (Attachment #14), concludes this expansion does not warrant any mitigation measures. Therefore, this future street and the northerly portion of the subject site are proposed for development when the undeveloped portion of the adjacent shopping center site is developed in the near future. C. The internal, private road through the site will be shifted north of its current location where it runs in front of the cinema due to the cinema's northward expansion. The relocated road, utilities, and lighting will be redeveloped to their present condition. A drop-off lane will be provided to limit impacts on the traffic flow and new designated cross walk areas and additional speed bumps will be included. D. The "open, public" planted space now located beneath the Seattle City Light transmission poles will be modified. This existing area is minimally developed and marginally conducive to public use due to its design and location. The proposal would retain a portion of this area (with upgraded landscaping) to maintain a landscape buffer around the new parking area here and to the south. To replace this reduced area of "open, public" space, the proposal provides increased, landscaped public areas both between the Evergreen Building and Cinema and around the Cinema, closer to the principal user, the Evergreen Building. In contrast to the existing "open" space, the new areas will offer large lawn areas, deciduous shade trees, and individual and group gathering areas with tables, seating, etc. in a more comfortable, user-friendly setting. PROJECT DESCRIPTION GENERAL CINEMA THEATRE EXPANSION (continued) E. The existing parking area in front of the Cinema and Evergreen Building will be restriped and expanded northward into the "open" space. The lay-out of this new parking is based on the configuration of the adjacent future public street in its final, developed form. Efforts have been taken to reduce parking/traffic congestion and pedestrian traffic immediately in front of the Cinema and to minimize intersection impacts on the future public street. New landscaping and lighting will be provided in the parking lot areas consistent with the level of development with the Cinema. F. Despite the fact that the Renton Place office buildings are not owned by the applicant, the Renton Village area is generally perceived by the public as a single development. Understanding this, Renton Village Associates desires to establish and maintain a consistency of site lighting, levels and types of landscaping, and site features (such as tables, benches, etc.) on both this proposal and their future proposals. The types of features, lighting and landscaping provided on One, Two and Three Renton Place will be proposed as standards and offered for this proposal. G. The parking area located on the northern portion of the subject property (north of the Evergreen Building) is to be restriped. The restriping of this existing parking area will only create 18 new parking spaces. As a result, this alteration does not require City approval and is not included in the Site Plan Approval area. Again, this area and the area adjacent to the Chevron station will be included in future proposals for the undeveloped portion of the shopping center site. In summary, the project will result in an enhancement of both the appearance and image that the existing cinema projects to the surrounding area. It will also improve the level of finish of the site itself through the upgrading and consistency of the landscaping, site lighting, and parking areas.' The amount of asphalt parking area will be reduced while maintaining the required parking per City ordinances. Better quality, more usable, outdoor spaces and amenities will be provided for the tenants on the site. ATTAGH.MENT . # 1..6 c, i` G F,,.2NOV 2 319Tr RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA EXPANSION CUlLDlRIG/ZMiPdG DEPTo SITE ACOUSTICS SURVEY Per the preliminary meeting with the City of Renton, this supplemental information has been provided for consideration. The subject of concern is the traffic noise level differences between the existing open, public space on the subject site and the new proposed location for these types of opportunities and uses. As the study indicates the levels at the two sites ranges from 61 to 66 db. As a reference for comparison, the typical db level inside the average automobile at highway speeds ranges from 70 to 80 db. While the traffic noise level can be identified as perceivably higher in the proposed location, this factor alone would not seem to overrule the advantages of this area. Two factors contributed heavily to selection of this location: The existence of much older growth shade trees, shrubbery, and lawns both immediate and within a short distance to be included and expanded upon physically and perceptibly; The absence of considerable site traffic flow both around the area and separating it from the principal user. Both these factors provide significant opportunities to develop a space that would be more amenable, user-friendly, and accessible. Although the traffic noise level is not ideal in either location discussed, the current location of several of the major City Parks with similar adjacencies to 1-405 suggest that traffic noise is not the major consideration in public outdoor space location. The traffic noise generated by 1-405 is an unfortunate fact to be accepted within the City of Renton. The proposal contends that the physical, spacial qualities are much more significant factors to consider for this type of use. be/st 115 Towne,Richards & Chaudiere, Inc. Consultants in Sound and Vibration November 6, 1987 Mr. Brian Cloepfil The Callison Partnership 1423 Third Avenue, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98101 Re: Renton Village Cinema Dear Mr. Cloepfil : The following is a report of the noise monitoring conducted in existing and proposed park locations near the Renton Village Cinema Center on November 3, 1987. Exterior sound levels were measured continuously over three 15 minute periods at two locations. A Digital Acoustics 6O7P noise monitor and a Larson-Davis 800E noise monitor used to make the measurement. One monitor was located in the center of the small circle of benches in the existing park. The second monitor was located on the edge of the sidewalk bordering the south parking lot between the Renton Cinema Building and the Evergreen Building, such that there were no direct reflections off of either of the buildings. These locations are approximately the same as those shown on the Renton Village Cinema site plan dated October 22, 1987. The results of the three measurements are shown below. The sound levels are given in A-Weighted decibels dB(A) . EQUIVALENT SOUND LEVELS (LEQ) START TIME EXISTING PARK PROPOSED PARK DIFFERENCE 1:50 p.m. 6OdB(A) 66dB(A) 6dB 2:05 p.m. 61dB(A) 66dB(A) 5dB 2:20 p.m. 63dB(A) 66dB(A) 3dB 105 NE 56th Street Seattle.Washington 98105 2061523-3350 Mr. Brian Cloepfil Nov emb er 6, 1987 Page Two An increase in activity in the parking lot adjacent to the existing site resulted in an increase in the noise level during the third measurement. The noise difference of 5 to 6 decibels between the two sites is considered significant. The proposed site is approximately 260 feet closer to the major noise source, Interstate 405 and does not have the shielding provided by the Renton Cinema Building and the Evergreen Building. Please call if may be of further service. Sincerely, TOWNE, RICHARDS & CHAUDIERE, INC. (f�/7•�iov,J Alexander I. Veress AIV/jb Towne, Richards & Chaudiere, Inc. Consultants in Sound and Vibration v�. At1 AOHMENT # 14 RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA TRANSPORTATION SECTION ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Prepared for: Renton Village Associates November 11, 1987 c: r OF - ... rD) [13_ [1 \II 19B7 DUILDING/ZGNIf'JG DEPT. Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98007 TG: 87288.00 This report addresses the transportation element of an environmental checklist for the proposed reconstruction and expansion of the Renton Village Cinema from three screens and 1,405 seats to eight screens and 2,260 seats. Little published information is available to assess the traffic and park- ing impacts of theater projects.- However, in 1985 The TRANSPO Group performed an operational study for the expansion of the Factoria SRO Cinema located in King County just south of Bellevue. The theater was recently expanded to eight screens and enjoys good attendance. General Cinema Corporation, pro- posed operators of the Renton Village Cinema, has compiled attendance and vehicle occupancy data for all of their sites nationwide. The data on the Factoria exceeds the General Cinema Corporation's national averages. In order to represent a reasonable worst case for the Puget Sound area, the Factoria Cinema data will be applied to the Renton Village Cinema analysis. The Factoria Cinema study showed that the highest attendance days are Friday through Sunday, with attendance up to five times greater than other days. In addition, three to five times per year, the theater complex exper- ienced attendance peaks when all segments of the theater were nearly full . These peak days occurred on holidays or weekends. For this study, figures reflecting average Friday attendance were used. Additionally, the impact of the peak days, though infrequent, was assessed. Local Public Street System and Site Access The project site is located at the northweesst�, corner of the I-405/SR 161 (E Valley Highway) interchange in the City of Renton as shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 indicates the local roadways which serve the site, including I-405, SR 167/Rainier Avenue S, S Grady Way, Talbot Road S (SR 515) and S Renton .Village Place. Primary site access is via a driveway on S Grady Way at Lake Avenue and an entrance at S Renton Village Place from Talbot Road S. S Grady Way is a four-lane, two-way arterial providing east-west site access. At the signalized intersections, exclusive left and/or right-turn lanes are provided as indicated in Figure 2. Parking is prohibited on S Grady Way and there are sidewalks on the north side of the street only. -1- . • soS S2ST S3ST 9 .,2su11sE1 ea s y W 9 !` x SW7ST • PARK II RIDE• PROJECT SITE REHTOH / YIUA6E PL 1-405 '• / F 5'�60�00 .' 4`FaQB4y L co 4. ....j • o 0 -. m N. N E N T O M N r es LONGACaES tACE TSACC 0. A NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 1 I�� CINEMA SITE LOCATION Grove -2- -______Y - I N � SGQ`AQ,��A ,c________, ,,, � j , , � .,,,,,, , � (.. ,.. _� i 1 -M ii in ti it- �.> 1fifi • �, ____.. Ilk ----\ 1ll1 BEHTON ji VILLAGE PL f PROPOSED EXPANDED THEATER ////// SITE C° D iTi 10 cc • N O H O m J i 1- C3-71° t0 s in TRAFFIC SIGNAL A STOP SIGH A NOORRTTH Figure 2 RENTON VILLAGE ADJACENT ROADWAY TRANSPO CINEMA CONFIGURATION AND CONTROL Gro\il' -3- TG: 87288.00 Talbot Road S (SR 515) is a five-lane, two-way north-south arterial com- prised of two travel lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane. There is no parking allowed on Talbot Road S and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the street. S .Renton Village Place is a two-lane, two-way local access roadway with separate left and right-turn lanes at Talbot Road S. Parking is allowed on the south side of the street and sidewalks are provided on both sides of the roadway. Intersection control is also shown in Figure 2. Traffic signals are located at both major site access points. Existing PM peak hour turning movement counts were performed at the pri- mary site access points in October 1987. Based on 1985 Highway Capacity Manual methods, the intersection of S Grady Way at Lake Avenue S operates at LOS E and the intersection of Talbot Road S at S Renton Village Place operates at LOS B during the PM peak hour. The PM peak hour is 4:00 to 5:00 PM. Public Transit Transit routes and bus stop locations are shown on Figure 3. The South Renton park-and-ride lot is located just north of the site. The majority of area bus service is oriented towards peak-hour commuter service. Route 155 is the only route to provide service during theater peak hour operation. On weekdays, service is provided from 5:30 AM to 10:00 PM at approximately one-hour headways. Route 155 serves Downtown Renton, the South Renton park-and-ride lot, Fairwood, Cascade Vista, and Southcenter. The nearest transit stop is located on Talbot Road S at S Renton Village Place approximately 1,500 feet from the Renton Village Cinema. Parking The project site is now occupied by the Evergreen Building, an office building occupying approximately 73,800 square feet (sf) of gross leasable floor area (glfa), and by the existing three-screen Renton Village Cinema. -4- • SOUTH RENTON PARK 'N' RIDE 145 . . 149 155 . 167 240 �� 240 �. 247 e�� 340 c77/Z 4 h 909 r y L 4 N. s J H ^ yam) 1'-'C f- \ 0 . flin 145 f1 • 148 RENTON 1 155 1495. VILLAGE FL A PROPOSED 1 145 149 EXPANDED 148 155. 7) .ra:__F THEATER I - SITE i , 05 sca cc C. D . 17,- co O cc 1-• O co i I-- ETAID N . 32( TRAFFIC SIOtlAL A BUS STOP' A. xxx XXX ROUTE NUMBERS NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 3 PUBLIC TRANSIT TRANSI CINEMA rov . -5- TG: 87288.00 The site parking demand must consider both uses. To assess the parking- related impacts of the theater expansion, four times of day will be examined -- the average event parking demand and the peak event parking demand, for both daytime (7:00 AM to 4:00 PM) and evening conditions. Parking Demand and Supply The office building parking demand can be estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (1985). The parking demand for the theater can be estimated based on experience at Factoria. The Factoria study showed that average vehicle occupancy for a theater is 2.5 persons per vehicle. Film showings at multi-screen theaters are normally staggered in about 15 to 20 minute intervals and film length averages about two hours. The staggering of shows reduces the parking requirement to one-half of the total theater occupancy during a two-hour show period (versus having all showings at'once with the parking demand then equal to 100 percent of occupancy). Some overlap will occur from the prior show period; but this overlap did not exceed four percent in. the Factoria experience. Table 1 shows the parking demands for the four times specified. Table 2 shows the existing and future parking supply. The parking demand does not currently exceed the supply at any time. Table 1 Parking Demand Average Day Peak Day Existing Future Existing Future Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Day Eve Office 185 Negl* 185 Negl* Negl* Negl* Negl* Negl* Theater 50 240 75 370 230 550 380 880 Totals 235 240 260 370 230 550 380 880 * Office building holiday, weekend, and evening parking demand data is unavailable. Some demand exists due to maintenance/janitorial personnel and overtime and swing-shift workers, but is assumed negligible (Negl ) at less than 10 vehicles on average. -6- TG: 87288.00 Table 2 Parking Supply On-site Off-site Total Existing 611 0 611 Future 569 220* 789 * Via pending joint-use parking agreement with adjacent owner. The daytime theater parking demand will average 75 vehicles and the even- ing demand will average 370 vehicles after the theater is expanded. The on- site supply of 569 spaces will be more than adequate to handle the average weekday demand. The expanded theater will exceed the supply only during the evening period (8:30 to 9:30 PM) of the three to five annual peak days. At those times, the demand will exceed the on-site supply by 311 spaces. Overflow of 220 spaces will be accommodated by the adjacent proposed joint-use parking lot at the One Renton Center building (see Code Requirement section, below). The remaining excess parking demand of 91 spaces can be easily accommodated by using other adjacent office and retail parking without causing spillover onto City streets. These peak days occur on weekends or holidays when offices are usually closed. Code Requirement The City of Renton code requirement for theaters is one space per four seats. This results in a requirement for 565 spaces. The Evergreen Building requirement is for 369 spaces. In addition there is an existing parking easement to One Renton Place for 56 spaces on site. A total of 990 spaces should be provided on site if code is met. Due to the dissimilar peak hours of office building and theater uses, it has been proposed that a joint-use parking agreement be entered into between the One Renton Center building owners and the Renton Village theater owners to cover the 220 spaces located just east of the theater (see Figure 4). -7- k.._. _- ,- --- - 1. • • 1 ___ ____,--, ___ ----- ._. v . i ......e., � 1____ r 0 ..... .. 1 .. . ____________ ---- _____--F 1,______. 1 ,__.., L__. ....... li ! . [ „-------- 6 ' 1 j , li LIMIT OF -- T" t T 1 7 I \ SITE PLAN APPROVAL 188 ' [ I. L. i 1 .. _ _ .- :/-,,o4 , \- .. . -..-il_ ,.......„,:.,,. ,..........,.....::..-7.,..e..,,..4.1111lairt.,.., . ... LI • • 1411*. ,..,..-,.,-...A, -..-..,:::::-0::::.:::::,,* .....,....„:„.„.„:„..„ . . -.....,:...........:.• - ..k i�L ; :::18 .aw. tii 'u •....�.w;.t•:w-.:{:•.;::.:v::j`:2n\;�:S`p:.•:w: '�/ •4tiV,:;:�}:::.M1�` 'k:::.:fi:fi'n%�-•-`•.;:ni:tiu4•.k:i'f•J' •:\`,::tib:•;:��/ kti::: •:�a:+3ti: `•`�::�'`iss`•�itiM1��.•'„ `<:.;.,t•.:2:�ti;;:.;.;:..x:r.�.:v�:.':��lv�:�-•:,.:-:::-=- � ,,a :,� �~\'...•Y.ti ii;�v.y.::� ::ti!K/hpf.VIY•}OL•_,�;;:�"�'•i:\ti��. PROJECT SITE - --,,;.;"giv'Sg, :?.f:r5fi ...0./z=V:. 4 '"" SEPARATELY OWNED PARKING `i00 PROPOSED FOR JOINT-USE SOURCE: THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP RENTON VILLAGE Figure 4 CINEMA FUTURE PARKING SUPPLY -TRAN5PO -8- TG: 87288.00 The joint use with One Renton Center will work well to alleviate most peak parking demands that may occur and will allow the expanded theater to meet parking code requirements. The 220 spaces will likely experience high use by theater goers since they are close to the theater. Roadway Improvements The proposal will not require new roadways or improvements to existing roads and streets. Water, Rail , and Air Transportation There will be no alterations to water, rail , or air transportation due to the proposed theater expansion. Project Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment The existing Renton Village Cinema consists of three theaters with a total of 1,405 seats. The proposed rebuild would add five theaters and bring the total to 2,260 seats. Trip Generation Based upon the Factoria analysis, the expected theater utilization during the four analysis periods (average and peak day, daytime and evening) was determined. Theater traffic activity peaks during the 8:30 to 9:30 PM hour. A factor of 2.5 persons per auto was used to represent average vehicle occupancy, based upon the experience at Factoria. Each vehicle makes two trips -- one to the theater and one away from the theater. Based upon the patronage characteristics during the four analysis periods, traffic activity was estimated and is shown in Table 3 for both the existing theater and the expanded theater. -9- TG: 87288.00 Table 3 Theater Trip Generation Existing Project Total Condition Increment W/Project Average Day PM Peak (4:00 - 5:00 PM) 45/39 27/24 72/63 Evening (8:30 - 9:30 PM) 140/140 86/86 226/226 Peak Day PM Peak (4:00 - 5:00 PM) 225/255 137/137 362/362 Evening (8:30 - 9:30 PM) 534/534 325/325 859/859 Key: XXX/XXX = enter/exit On an average day, the expanded theater would add 51 vehicles trips (27 entering, 24 exiting) to the PM peak hour traffic volumes. On the three to five annual peak days, 650 vehicle trips (325 entering, 325 exiting) will be introduced in the evening 8:30 to 9:30 PM period. This represents the maximum vehicle trips generated by the expanded theater and will most likely occur on a weekend or holiday. Traffic Distribution and Assignment Figure 5 shows the estimated project trip distribution. Approximately one-half of the theater patrons approach the site via S Grady Way and one-half approach via Talbot Road S. The existing and estimated PM peak hour trips that would be added by the project are shown in Figure 6. As is shown, the relative impact of added PM peak hour trips due to the expanded theater will be slight since the trips represent less than 1 percent of the traffic on S Grady Way and on Talbot Road S. The majority of theater-related traffic will occur during off-peak periods when the local roadways have excess reserve capacity. -10- ...____Y //,/,v C17:21 ��Q L. W J 4 .d A\ ,to •L., `� s ..L.,. L 6, \_________________j 5°b „, ...„..n c---\ r) j5% ....----} „, i .....-____.-Aten-----nfinscio .. RENTON VILLAGE Pl. PROPOSED /r-CID r EXPANDED THEATER �/ SITE Vi05 0 2 35% O - O J C A . Eo 1: TRAFFIC SIGNAL A. NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 5 CINEMA TRIP DISTRIBUTION TRANSP0 row. - -11- �-o -— 0 M N.-1 J1L 9(10) -''/ \L 3(0) 1137(0 —► 1159(0) 167(12)—,,,1/4 y— 14(1) ii' ,. ..7 • ASS o o�- to.V��.: MNN 4,3 ti Lu x SG�PO * -� W Y ra c7in Q / \ • rm 1 .-1 r) .....'''" 0 r.............n n RENTON VILLAGE PI • PROPOSED EXPANDED Cali) vi• THEATER SITE vos N O O m ...-.-,-, _O l!)tO ) / A 178(4) —' 438(8)-.t 1 t .32 TRAFFIC SIGNAL XXX < EX. PM PEAK o 0 (XXX}E PLUS PROJECT TRIPS NLO A —PROJECT TRIPS NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure sintANsPO CINEMA PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES crro.,r -12- TG: 87288.00 On-site Circulation The expanded theater will contribute approximately 51 vehicle trips to the existing PM peak hour traffic on site. Typical on-site circulation patterns were observed during peak hour and are shown on Figure 7. The majority of on-site traffic does not pass in front of the theater or the Evergreen Building due to speed bumps located in front of these buildings. This pattern should not change with theater expansion. Pedestrian-vehicle conflicts are typical at theaters especially just before a show time. The expanded theater is likely to experience a degree of conflict just in front of the theater and on the west side of the theater. However, the parking lot has been designed to encourage only drop-off traffic to pass in front of the theater and minimize the number of potential conflicts. There has been a discussion in the past regarding the construction of a city street through the site as shown in Figure 7. However, the theater expansion will not generate sufficient traffic volumes to warrant construction of the road at this time. Recognizing the fact that the road will be con- structed at some future date, Ithe parking lots will be designed in a configuration that will easily adapt to a road installation. Reduction of Transportation Impacts From the preceding analysis and findings, we conclude that the proposed project will have a negligible traffic impact on the vicinity street system. No measures are required to reduce the transportation impacts of the project beyond those proposed. -13- • • 'tk... .„,,,___,./- /• I I _ ri: c T f ' n ; I ii. C .. - 1 I4Lt RIGHT-OF-WAY i 46t! _ L______ /1144.1.' ". ... s 1 4 • . pi..,. ."Ite,/./.~-,‹• -- ' • P� ` TO TALBOT RD S er _ __,,_ ,/,•••-• ,.., T . --, , , ;et/ - r , , 4, . . , i . , s „. -,, .,,,4, ,- . ,o. .. / 4) , i .,, ... . ., . ,./....,,,,A ,. _„ .. ,L______. . . u, „4.,,,,--„,,_,,,v, . . . 4:-.0-. , - -.) ___,-------1----- • SOURCE: Q THE CALLISON PARTNERSHIP NORTH RENTON VILLAGE Figure 7 CINEMA MAJOR SITE CIRCULATION PATTERNS TRANS[ O Grove -14- kiT lOAM ENT -3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN APPROVAL -AREA.' That portion of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, and that portion of Blocks 11,12,14, and 15 of C.D. Hillman's Earlington Gardens Addition to the City of Seattle, Division No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 17 of Plats, Page 74 and vacated streets and alleys attached thereto described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; thence S 01°04'08" W along the east line of said southwest quarter, a distance of 250.02 feet; thence N 89°44'02" W, a distance of 18.28 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 61°42'59" W, a distance of 258.92 feet; thence S 00°02'16" E, a distance of 248.94 feet to the northerly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1, Jct. SSH No. 2-M to Jct. Psh No. 2 in Renton (also known as State Road No. 405) as approved October 31, 1961-the latest revision being November 7, 1986; thence westerly and northwesterly along said margin the following courses: N 89°49'09" W, a distance of 44.72 feet; thence S 83°23'09" W, a distance of 82.06 feet; thence N 89°54'45" W, a distance of 241.66 feet to a point on a curve having'a radius of 390.8 feet and having a radial bearing of S 17°05'13" W; • thence northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 32°52'06", 1 an arc distance of 224.19 feet; thence N 40 02'41" W, a distance of J 150.00 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 283.8 feet through a central angle of 16°15'36", an arc distance of 81.96 feet; thence leaving said margin, N 14°17'27" E, a distance of 248.85 feet; thence S 70°00'00" E, a distance of 222.54 feet; thence N 48°00'00" E, a distance of 284.73 feet to a point on a curve having a radius of 180.00 feet and having a radial bearing of S 54°32'30" W; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of .t 6°15'31", an arc distance of 19.66 feet; thence S ,41°43'00" E, a dis- tance of 254.78 feet to a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 180.00 feet; thence southeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 48°O1'02", an arc distance of 150.85 feet; thence S 89°44'02" E a distance of 140.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1;:nTo ,335,033 s.f. 7.6913 acres NOV 2319ic ZONING DEPT. gU1Lp1NGI 8-31-87 87021 ATTA HMENT # 15 REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 'RECONSTRUCTION OF RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR M. SANDORFFY COMPANY CM( NOV 239-87 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. • GeoEngineers Incorporated • 414 TA; l%r4 GeoEngineers Incorporated (206)746-5200 Consulting Geotechnical Fax. (206)746-5068 Engineers and Geologists 2405- 140th Ave. N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 July 21, 1987 M. Sandorffy Company 607 Third Avenue, Suite 315 Seattle, Washington 98104 • Attention: Mr. Mike Sandorffy Gentlemen: We are pleased to submit our "Report , Geotechnical Engineering Services, Reconstruction of Renton Village Cinema, Renton, Washington." The scope of our services was discussed with you on June 30, 1987 and subse- quently outlined in a confirming agreement from our office dated July 1, 1987 which you signed on the same date. It has been a pleasure to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please contact us. We are prepared to provide appropriate consultation during the final design phase and monitoring services during construction to evaluate if the applicable portions of the contractor's work are completed in accordance with the intent of our recommendations. Your• very truly, G: . :ineers, c. ' . Tuttle ncipal JRG:JKT:wd File No. 1183-01-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 SCOPE - 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 SURFACE CONDITIONS 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 GENERAL 4 SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK 4 ' Structural Fill 5 Fill Settlement 6 PILE FOUNDATIONS 6 Timber Piles 7 Augercast Piles 8 Pile Downdrag 9 Pile Uplift 9 LATERAL RESISTANCE 9 FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT 10 ENTRIES, SIDEWALKS AND UTILITIES 10 • PAVEMENTS 11 RETAINING WALLS 12 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS 12 USE OF THIS REPORT 13 List of Figures Figure No. SITE PLAN 1 APPENDIX Page No. FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING A-1 List of Appendix Figures Figure No. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM A-1 KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS A-2 LOGS OF BORINGS A-3 thru A-7 GeoEngineers Incorporated REPORT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES RECONSTRUCTION OF RENTON VILLAGE CINEMA RENTON, WASHINGTON FOR M. SANDORFFY COMPANY INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering services for the proposed reconstruction of the Renton Village Cinema I, II. and III building in Renton, Washington. A conceptual layout for the proposed reconstruction and an outline of the existing structure are shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. We understand the existing building is to be demolished. The building, including the floor slab, is reportedly supported on timber piling. The east end of the building, where the floor slab is about 6 feet below the present ground surface, has had a history of problems with seasonal seepage. We provided consultation to define remedial actions to diminish the seepage problems in 1983. Information with respect to the new building size, finished floor grades and foundation loads is not available at this time. However, based on conversations with Mr. Brian Cloepfil of The Callison Partnership, we understand preliminary finished floor grades will likely range from Elevations 26 to 32. This would put the lowest grade at or near the existing site pavement grades. The lobby will be raised on the order of 5 feet above the lowest elevation of the largest theater. Considerable earthwork, including placement of new fill, is indicated to be necessary to modify the existing grades to fit the numerous theaters for the new building. SCOPE The purpose of our services is to develop recommendations for founda— tion design, site grading and drainage in relation to construction of the proposed new cinema building. Specifically, our scope of services includes: GeoEngineers Incorporated 1. Exploring subsurface soil, rock and ground water conditions by drilling four borings within the general area of the planned new building footprint. 2. Performing limited laboratory testing on the soils encountered to provide data for correlation with the existing information in our files. 3. Providing recommendations for foundation support of the structure, including capacity—penetration relationships for piles, if deep foundations are necessary or allowable design bearing values if spread foundations can be used. 4. Providing design criteria for subgrade basement walls and any other retaining structures associated with the planned new project. 5. Providing recommendations for site preparation and earthwork, including recommended types of fill material, compaction criteria, temporary cut slopes and temporary drainage requirements. 6. Providing recommendations for installation of subdrain facilities to maintain the lower level of the cinema in a dry condition. 7. Providing recommendations for the design and construction of any new pavement areas which may be constructed as part of this project. SITE CONDITIONS The existing building is a concrete structure. We understand that the building, including the floor, is supported on timber piles. The actual length of piling used and the loads imposed on these piling are not known. However, it is likely that the piles were driven to refusal on bedrock. SURFACE CONDITIONS The existing building is surrounded by landscaped areas, lawn, concrete sidewalks and asphalt concrete paved driveway and parking areas. A downward tilt of the stair landings away from the building at the theater exits on the south side of the building indicates that the earth berm/planter area has settled considerably with respect to the pile—supported building. 2 GeoEngineers \ Incorporated SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface conditions at the site were explored. by drilling four test borings near the corners of the proposed building, as shown on the Site Plan, Figure 1. A description of our field exploration program, including the boring logs, is presented in the Appendix. The borings encountered variable subsurface conditions. However, the general sequence of fill and alluvial soils over sandstone bedrock is in agreement with other subsurface explorations which we have performed'in the Renton Village complex. The site is mantled by a varying thickness of fill. At some locations, it is difficult to define the demarcation between manmade fill and the natural alluvial deposits. We interpret the upper 2-1/2 to 7 feet of soils at the boring locations to be fill. Greater depths may be present within the existing building footprint area. The fill which we encountered consists of loose to medium dense fine or fine to medium sand with a trace of silt and gravel. The fill is underlain by variable sequences of soft to . medium stiff silt, organic silt and loose to medium dense sand overlying a varying thickness of loose to medium dense fine or fine to medium sand (highly weathered sandstone). Moderately hard sandstone was encountered at depths below the ground surface ranging from 13 feet in Boring 4 to about 48 feet in Boring 1. Based on our experience in the immediate area, the thickness of weathered sandstone and the depth to moderately hard sandstone may be quite variable between the borings . The soil and. rock stratigraphy encountered in the borings are described in the logs of borings in Figures A-3 through A-7. The ground water levels observed during the exploration program are indicated on the individual boring logs. Standpipe piezometers were installed in all four borings. Water levels were subsequently measured at 11, 8-1/2, 8-1/2 and 5-1/2 feet below the ground surface in Borings 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, on July 14, 1987. Fluctuations in the ground water levels should be expected due to changes in precipitation, season, site utilization and other factors. 3 GeoEngineers Incorporated CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL We recommend that the new structure be supported on piles which are driven to or drilled in the moderately hard sandstone. At this time it appears that the lower floor slab of the new structure should also be pile-supported to eliminate the potential for differential settlement between the slab and the building frame. If the existing timber piles can be accurately located and the allowable capacities verified, it might be possible to use some of the these piles for support of the new floor slab. Since new finished floor elevations are probably going to be higher than the. existing finished floor, the piles would have to be extended to reach new pile cap grades. We suggest that the structural engineer evaluate whether it would be more cost-effective to abandon and replace the existing piles or to extend and reuse a portion of them. In any case, care should be exer- cised during design to determine that new pile locations do not conflict with the existing piles and caps. SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK We anticipate that trees, bushes and shrubs will be salvaged from the landscaped areas during demolition. Lawn areas can be left in place unless there is salvage value in stripping the sod, providing that floor slabs are pile-supported. Otherwise, the sod should be stripped. The existing asphalt , sidewalks and floor slabs can be broken into relatively small pieces (less than 2 feet maximum dimension) and left in place within the new building area if not in conflict with new piles and utilities. If the new pile locations are not accurately known at the time of demolition, it may be preferable to remove all pavement and slabs from the building area. All foundation walls and pile caps should be removed and piles not incorporated into the new building cut off at least 2 feet below the bottom of new pile caps or planned subgrade elevations. The fill soils encountered in our borings will provide relatively stable subgrade support, except to heavy construction traffic during wet or saturated conditions. We are not aware of the nature of the fill under the 4 GeoEngineers Incorporated existing building, although a clay-type soil has been reported. This type of fine-grained soil is very sensitive to moisture and is easily disturbed during wet weather. All existing voids (abandoned vaults, manholes, etc.) and depressions should be backfilled. Any new fill placed in sidewalk and pavement areas should be placed as structural fill. All fill placed within the' building footprint need only be compacted enough to provide trafficability for construction equipment if the floor slab is pile-supported. This latter fill should be primarily granular in nature, free of organics and deleteri- ous material. Rock and inorganic debris fragments such as asphalt and concrete should be limited to less than 6 inches so as to not interfere with pile installation. Structural Fill: We anticipate only minor quantities of structural fill will be required, primarily limited to raising grades in the new parking areas. All new fill in sidewalk and pavement areas should be placed as compacted structural fill. The fill should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding 10 inches in loose thickness and uniformly compacted. Fill placed in sidewalk, pavement areas or in utility trenches within 2 feet of the finished subgrade surface should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D-1557 test procedure. Fill at depths greater than 2 feet below the finished subgrade should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the same standard. All structural fill should be free of organics and other deleterious material. Rocks and inorganic debris fragments should be limited to less than 5 inches and may be utilized in structural fill at least 1 foot below the subgrade surface. The maximum size of gravel in the top 1 foot of structural fill should not exceed 3 inches. The suitability of material for use as structural fill will depend on the weather at the time of placement, the gradation and moisture content of the soil. As the fines (that portion passing the No. 200 sieve) increases, the soil becomes increasingly sensi- tive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult or impossible to achieve. Generally, soils containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight cannot be properly compacted when the 5 GeoEngineers Incorporated moisture content is more than a few percent from optimum. If the fill is to be placed during wet weather, we recommend the fines content be limited to less than 5 percent, based on that portion passing the 3/4—inch sieve. We recommend that a representative from our firm observe the placement and compaction of structural fill. An adequate number of in—place density tests should be performed as the fill is being placed to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Fill Settlement: We understand the finished floor elevations of the new building will be generally higher than the existing building to avoid the past water problems that have occurred. Depending upon the actual• theater configuration and grades, considerable fill may be needed to achieve these grades. The new fill loads will cause consolidation of the compres— sible silts which underlie the site. Unless the fill is placed sufficiently far in advance of pile installation for the settlement to be essentially complete, downdrag forces will be transmitted to the piles. Settlements will vary with the least settlements being experienced in the southeast corner of the building, and the greatest in the northwest. We cannot evaluate the probable pattern of settlements without grading plan informa— tion. We anticipate that settlements of several inches would be experienced in the northwest part of the building if 5 feet or more of fill is placed. In order for settlements to be largely complete so that downdrag loads on piles could be ignored, we estimate that the fill would have to be in place up to 6 to 8 weeks in advance of pile installation. PILE FOUNDATIONS We recommend that the entire structure, including the lower floor slab, be pile—supported. This recommendation should be reevaluated when final design plans are developed since it may be practical to use soil—supported slabs if little or no new fill is to be placed. We recommend the use of either timber piles driven to refusal into the weathered sandstone bedrock or augercast piles drilled and socketed into the sandstone bedrock. Depths to the moderately hard sandstone bedrock surface vary between about 14 and 49 feet below existing grades at our boring locations. Based on previous studies and pile installation in Renton Village, localized variations within the bedrock surface should be expected. 6 GeoEngineers Incorporated We recommend that each column be supported on at least two piles to minimize possible eccentric loading on the piles. No reduction of pile capacity for group action is necessary since the piles will derive their support by end-bearing. Timber Piles: Timber piles are typically economical within this length range; however, the variable depth to bedrock will require conservative estimates of pile length variations across the site. This could result in considerable wastage. Splicing of timber piles is generally not desirable due to the loss of uplift and lateral capacities. Under these circum- stances, a test-driving program to help define the lengths needed would be. prudent prior to ordering production piles. • All timber piles should be pressure-treated, conforming to the standard specifications outlined in ASTM D-25. We recommend an allowable design axial load of 30 tons for timber piles with an 8-inch-diameter tip, and 45 tons for a 10-inch-diameter tip. These values are for the total of dead and long-term live loads, including downdrag-induced loads. These capa- cities can be increased by one-third when considering wind or seismic forces. The extent by which the allowable axial capacity for structural loads should be decreased due to downdrag is discussed subsequently. The strength of the pile and other structural considerations may limit the allowable capacities, particularly when combined axial and horizontal loads are imposed. This aspect should be evaluated by the structural engineer. We recommend that the piles be driven with a hammer that has a rated energy of approximately 15,000 foot/pounds. The piles should be driven to refusal into the weathered sandstone bedrock. A minimum spacing of three- pile-butt diameters should be maintained in pile groups. We recommend the tips of the piles be banded or protected by driving shoes to reduce the risk of damage when driving into the bedrock. Assuming the use of a Vulcan 1 hammer with a rated energy of 15,000 foot-pounds, practical refusal for vertical piles is defined as 8 blows and 14 blows for the last 3 inches of set (penetration) for 8-inch and 10-inch-tip-diameter piles , respectively. The practical refusal criteria varies with the hammer size actually used by the contractor and its efficiency. We should be retained to provide revised 7 GeoEngineers Incorporated pile-driving criteria after the hammer is selected by the contractor. We • should also monitor the pile installation to determine if the piles are being driven to refusal in accordance with the plans and specifications. We anticipate settlement of pile-supported elements of the structure will be less than 1/4 inch. This settlement should occur rapidly as loads are applied. Augercast Piles: Augercast piles are constructed by drilling with a continuous-flight, hollow-stem auger to the required penetration and then pumping grout down the auger as it is removed, providing a cast-in-place concrete pile. These piles are relatively efficient at a site which requires variable pile lengths because the length can be easily adjusted. Augercast piles provide support for Two Renton Place. We recommend an allowable design axial load of 40 tons for a 12-inch- diameter augercast pile. This capacity is for the total of the dead, long- term live and any downdrag loads and may be increased by one-third when considering the effects of wind or seismic forces. The structural capacity of the piles should be evaluated by a structural engineer. The appropriate allowance for downdrag loads is discussed subsequently. • We recommend that the augercast piles be installed by drilling to practical refusal in the bedrock. They should be installed by a contractor experienced in their placement. We recommend monitoring of pile installation by our firm which will include maintaining a detailed record of the installation procedure, the volume. of grout used for each pile, pressure maintained during grouting, rate of auger withdrawal and any irregularities noted. For pile groups, we recommend that the augercast piles be spaced a minimum of three diameters center-to-center. The contractor must observe certain operational constraints when installing closely spaced piles to avoid damage to adjacent piles. In order to minimize the risk of damaging a completed pile, we recommend that the following be included in the specifi- cations. 8 GeoEngineers Incorporated I 1. Contractor shall be responsible for all methods and construction sequence to achieve satisfactory installation of the piles and shall replace at no cost to the owner any completed pile that is damaged by his work. 2. Piles should not be installed within a minimum of 10 pile dia- meters (or further as dictated by local ground conditions) of a pile which has been in place less than 12 hours and in which the grout has not obtained a strength of at least 60 psi. We estimate the settlement of foundations supported on 12-inch auger- cast piles designed and installed as recommended will be less than 1/4 inch.• Most of this settlement will occur rapidly as loads are applied. Pile Downdrag: Downdrag forces develop when surrounding compressible soils settle relative to a pile, thus transmitting load to the pile. If the grades are not changed significantly, little additional settlement will occur and there will be no appreciable downdrag loads on the piles . However, in any areas where several feet of fill is placed, significant settlements are expected. If between 2 and 5 feet of new fill is placed, we recommend that an allowance for downdrag of 4, 5 and 7 tons be made for the 8-inch tip timber, 10-inch tip timber, and 12-inch augercast piles, respectively. The downdrag forces should be added to the nominal design load for the pile to compute the total load acting on the pile. If more than 5 feet of fill will be placed, we should be contacted to evaluate whether or not higher downdrag loads may be imposed. We can provide more specific downdrag loads once the final grading plans are available. Pile Uplift: Uplift pile capacity develops as a result of the side friction between the pile and the adjacent soil. Therefore, the uplift capacity available is' a function of the length of the pile, which will be variable at this site, and the soil materials adjacent to the pile. If uplift resistance from the piles is needed, we can evaluate specific allowable capacities during the design phase. LATERAL RESISTANCE Lateral resistance to wind or seismic loading can be developed by passive resistance in the native soils acting on the upper portions of the piles, pile caps, grade beams or below-grade walls. The allowable lateral 9 GeoEngineers Incorporated • r loads for 8-inch-tip timber, 10-inch-tip timber and 12-inch augercast piles are 3, 4 and 5 kips, respectively. These lateral capacities assume a center-to-center pile spacing of at least three pile diameters and pile head fixity against rotation. Capacities are based on a maximum pile head deflection of approximately 1/2 inch. Reinforcement cages should extend a minimum depth of 14 feet in augercast piles. Passive pressures on the face of the pile caps, grade beams or other below-grade structural elements bearing against native soils may be computed using an equivalent fluid density of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Alternatively, a value of 300 pcf may be used if all soil extending out from. the face of the structural element for a distance at least equal to 2-1/2 times the depth of the element below grade consists of structural fill compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined in accordance with ASTM D-1557. The equivalent fluid density values presented above both include a factor of safety of about 1.5. FLOOR SLAB SUPPORT We understand the finished floor elevations of the new cinema building will be somewhat higher than the existing building. The new building footprint with eight theaters is expected to require variable amounts of regrading and new fill at the site. This will result in a complex settle- ment pattern across the building footprint. It might be possible to preload the site to reduce the differential settlement to within acceptable limits. This cannot be evaluated until more detailed grading information is avail- able, as noted previously. We anticipate that it may be preferable to support the floor slab on piling rather than accept the risk of differential . settlement between the various floor slab areas and the pile-supported building frame. ENTRIES, SIDEWALKS AND UTILITIES Entries and sidewalks constructed on significant thickness of new fill on the outside of structure will experience long-term settlement. The amount of ,the settlement will be directly related to the amount of fill placed and the time delay between filling and construction of the entries and sidewalks. As noted previously, the concrete landings at the top of the steps on the south side of the existing building have settled considerably, 10 GeoEngineers Incorporated resulting in a downward rotation of the outer edge of the landings. Therefore, sidewalks should be free from the building so that one side does not hang up and cause the sidewalk to tilt. Entries designed as a ramp with one end supported on the building and the other on the ground should be considered to avoid the development of- abrupt changes in grade. It may be appropriate to pile-support portions of the new raised entrance to the building. Buried utilities located in areas of significant new fill thicknesses will also experience some settlement. Utility lines that tie to the structure should have flexible connections and be designed to accommodate differential settlement without damage. This consideration should be • further evaluated during the design phase. To minimize postconstruction settlements due to fill placement, filling should be accomplished at the onset of construction and the construction of on-grade facilities (e.g., entries, sidewalks, buried utilities and pave- ments) delayed as long as possible. PAVEMENTS We recommend that as much of the existing paving remain in place as possible. At this time, it appears that the principal area of new pavement will be in the western portion of the existing building that will not be incorporated into the footprint of the new building. We cannot evaluate the subgrade soils beneath the building at this time. Therefore, the suggested pavement section below may need to be reevaluated once the building has been demolished and the soils exposed. After stripping and demolition is completed, we recommend the exposed surface be probed or proofrolled with heavy rubber-tired construction equipment. Any soft, loose or otherwise unsuitable areas should be recom- pacted if practical, or removed and replaced with structural fill, if necessary. If the subgrade soils are fine-grained, possess a moisture content above optimum, and have been disturbed, it may be necessary to perform a limited overexcavation and place a geotextile fabric prior to placing structural fill. We recommend that the probing and proofrolling of subgrade areas be observed by a representative of our firm to determine areas needing remedial work and to assess the adequacy of the subgrade 11 GeoEngineers Incorporated conditions. Structural fill as previously described should be placed to subgrade elevation. We recommend that any structural fill placed within 12 inches of the design subgrade elevation consist of clean sand and gravel with less than 5 percent fines. We recommend that the design pavement section in automobile parking areas consist of 2 inches of Class B asphalt concrete and 4 inches of crushed rock base course over at least 9 inches of granular subbase com- pacted to 95 percent, based on ASTM D-1557. In truck traffic areas, the design pavement section should consist of 3 inches of Class B asphalt concrete and 6 inches of crushed rock base course. Asphalt-treated base• (ATB) can be substituted for the base course to provide a working surface and- staging area during construction. Areas of ATB that experience severe cracking during construction should be repaired or replaced and the entire surface releveled prior to placing the asphalt surface. RETAINING WALLS We recommend that retaining walls be designed for lateral pressures based on an equivalent fluid density of 35 pcf. This assumes that the walls will not be restrained against rotation when backfill is placed. An allowance of 1 foot of increased wall height for each 100 psf of surcharge (floor load) which may be imposed adjacent to the walls should be made. We recommend the fill be compacted to about 92 percent of maximum dry density with hand-operated compactors within a 5-foot zone behind the walls. Overcompaction should be avoided. If any of the retaining walls are to utilize passive earth pressures to resist seismic or wind forces, the values presented previously in the Lateral Resistance section would be appropriate. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS We understand the lowest finished floor elevation will be at or above the existing pavement grades of Elevation 25. Special subgrade drainage provisions are not necessary under these circumstances. We recommend the roads and parking areas be sloped to drain away from the building such that surface runoff enters catch basins and is routed away from the building through a tightline collection and disposal system. Roof drains should not be connected to any subdrains. They should be connected to a tightline collection and disposal system. 12 GeoEngineers Incorporated