Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA89-047 •
" t
, 1::---:[::---T 2 . ,
'ewer.AA • r i
r .
At. ,
Ew N, ! F CZS
J .�1B Tt.lA.2l ,l 1 I .-} ELbT.n <LL s
r/(i.::: . ...._,-.._
+°•. „:,L {I -_____ ,__ �.,_ltgl--i._.,-l1'-�'y 'I •i \Mea ISY/1`/R 1 Has. •.c-S uw 1 D '' ,'".w'e_ '1,:a+,.Ya' ,).( ry
r] ..,_oc u r��:� I µ I i t mow xaR n WIC
BIRTH CENTER I' �_°A I Eu liN-,-''I, _ �`m{eT GeAna o• aW w.,.. q. y
n •
R. 'I • eK•n,L a SMIAL�iRa. �.,
I
r� Tow chtJ. "d
1 {}r�..: n•Pea;Lai oeA, BIRTH CENTER II
0.,1 I; I BIRTH CENTER ',
1_e•. 8L. Rx l O M� �F _ Y L A __� _ _ twcE sumo DETAIL — .s.:. . O
.11
‘tr
I .f.....:j j
Lb 1 .-1T"'�S�Ve',/%// p i tINPac r" - !• II---:TT :.�', 'x;;.,°. < I'O
r I< \\\ Ia-Ns ry II' .f°-'-��4P...'� � /A` /I W UZ
Z I'n v Z1 v,'trTH SCALE 1':30' ,4 SCALE 1':30' W
- N4TLj Lt,L tnN IrN NOTE: ACCESS FOR THIS PROTECT
• • BE THROUGH EXISTING
LANDSCAPED AND IRRIGATED AREA. Z w Or
EXISTING SUB-DRAINAGE SYSTEM SCALE 1':30' IRRIGATION REVISIONS RESPONSIBLE NTRAACTOSHALL BE
RESTOIING ALL PLANTING REVISIONS W J w
NA ISTING SUB- ;�
IRRIGATION.TOPSOIL (J
SUB-
DRAINAGE.PI RESULTING FROM
N IS OPERATIONS.ULAS BUILT'
DRAINAGE LEGEND curlinlBia'DERT:iLs o o ANoi
F TIE INDICATE
!—
BiRIGATION LEGEND AREA ARE INCLUDED LAND T E PLANTING LEGEND
THE EXISTING E. PRIOR FiNla{l.OLTFbIJRS MN RIfGIG tNO INFRASTRUCTURE. PRIOR TO NU.. NW TIN GE y1tR CC
COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION
C ••
ATL41 d,811.4 151.0 :I,I,I,I1111 R. CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY
R•f_. gin FU.VA1101-I AREAS TO BE UTILIZED FOR IGNI. IX. {1 N.HI
rIiWI
IGT LG MU ACCESS TO THE PROJECT. ACCESS GI
I.E. !WR GLEXATIpJ AREAS NI BE INVENTORIED 1WG was IW EC. 1f11'II DO 11.I.
• •-•-•-••-• •- 4" FL, lrR V PIPE BNIi GAIF LANDSCAPE
LARCNITECT FOR
3=���• �� EXISTING SUB-DRAINAGE. t9UY limaGT0'1 cum 1YIF It WI I'ccA111
LL _ 10'Aced IRRIGATION.TOPSOIL,PLANT+ Irtt I'1t-s: MATERIAL A LAWN CONDITIONS
e`nu mu PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF FUItl eXrG GMT MU ..
CONSTRUCTION. ALL REPAIRS IN LI.GO.IW WG'i m. 21.7 H'Lt.
Q 1'HU W U THESE AREAS SHALL BE SUBJECT
TO APPROVAL OF THEARCHITECT I(\ 1� IIOIB OIIYAI I1'Gl.W
0III'ma rtJ M)0 THE�PROJJECT�L ACCEPTANCE OF �-( ,110 'II"'Y fly r Ten 1•a.t..1.1I MO a
UDEN S./AI IN
MEN UINtIBi1 O WAL CO.11 MC to Iw. 1 LL
: 9
- WON 0 HNRCO _' !
�-4. r 1Kt�_ -L �A7 .JCIfS q[0'TO"�IVPb a`
I
la 1 i_I _ Ro-III+xer-s{• Js•meg o" • RevHons
•1,' L` e c..a _ _Jp r -8�.e� - _ SITE PLAN REVIEVL
'"'?7,,?i?:.r1r5"1` €i'°-'l' , • .4 ewe*,w1.. a 7— MQ(�I- Shlt¢lY�e61G -- .aen wet ste.wee Om HAW
.ap
I� ,I- ° A - Y _ _ — I A'IRIM1L YNWI Y7Mf 5/19/99
L' N1lA_'�Sei PVG.. •
_J• Iwl�a •1cgpL= 6-••ZO
,Il'�I i�III71I�11E��_ sumo
:( 7 19D'wJDN
�l I I Drawn Checked
_ 41041
Wawa,.m.o.
iMt IV CPIW14 ' '
Fry .wi�"wr' Ve.•Pc ler+L.ONTO 1 -'10R0-WSWr-t- I:_1z_11D FEB.17,1989
kak' Ter IXIm r.FAI I I.aXrA1.AXt A.A. IUD. p.� A4•ww..paw wax. �'C --1 _IA•�'-DI _. _ _
• we.**
v/IN1LM1.FEsu wow."" dLV "YD'• :M691Yur ann Tole
�Q Wr)8P H�'VALAL 7d'Y (5 .v.Aw.WWI SO C[00.1,L,• Swing Joint Assembly LAWN SPRAY HEAD a RISER PLANTING
�r ���::lll N� o'was W� 4 IRRIGATION
• O I I'•TD 6&ALC. NO KALE Sheet
L-1
r.S jj
oQo44o40 0 o O o ® O
ORELOCATE WARD@]BE EXISTING CWCRETE WALK TO REMAIN i ••�vit
I} _ �,'NG fJduET SNK, I SGWCIIT OPENW(fi ICI___ I rs.mvEE fdJCRETE . _ a
1 - I I I - I I I O I ""fie ro may. ALL FOR-NEWLWINN ,%.ALK I_L i _ O
cn.I MFHT SUrPO E%IZiINA OVERI{gNG,TW. J IC t_ ----�. __� O Q Z, g
TYVa : ADS3.!- ...
_ rr__-- j�.�r____
-1-y--_ _ - ''''''LLL - _ - 4
EX'51 4f , /—FJCSTING ROOF - O •O O• « '� u_ !_ REMOVE CLOSET PwrrripJ E%15TI rDLIlMN2 c/U
SPWCNr OPFIJIN({IN I PFNTIIOIISE / DRNN,TYPIUL -� - ! faLDIN6 CCVR f SOFFIT TO N,TYP L. II lip�y�- N
ROOAFUFDR GWAwI(AL11 p dl 0 7 g GE/'EEIJG OME20 N G, ABOVE f4WINDDW F B REMOVE CF].EAtf I O�+ m
p e + O -.ETA:G P.XFSTIN �1 MGTAL 5ascuRTA/AlR\\VTgET ORES AT TIT S4 <
EXISTING FAN,TYV. • -::� BIRDNING RAa•li ENNDri.REMOTE CLgNW+i TWLkS. CpWMN2,TYPICAL. \w.�l, 3
Op ❑D • I - O '• FI REMOVE VINYL FLOOR. L/1 T3 aS2TING
ilsim
IN WALL arr FO¢DIXTBos . I� ISCCO WALL ERKR' WR DUCTS�TYV. yy�FZ+nRLCTI nw� __ i yp�TTFF��,�Q[[�wL1• REIO[dA E1U5TING I
I5000 ,I.-- _ _ _ O DRAWINGS. II M� GAf Gz C V4 E SEE UIPMENr. O
I�EI�N(�fa<F-0IIIPMENT /\ RFMWE WAt{tl�. _ _ r—�— J Q
O9 TO MATCH 1 _ _ _ EI(ISTING fORWDOR. ,�y1° N IN LAI'AR ! ,i� FLlANICAL t FJ.ECrwUL DRAwINGs. __
FIIAAII CC f% -.. 'TD LEr. \ / I.J tw.E a0: NO CHANGE,TO wALL. —I I© i
E%TERIO AILS.9AWCLfT OPENING _l ,� SAWCIIT zLAB!REMq.E CONCRETE. IIIIIPF OpNI��� FFO¢N S STRDLTURAL DRAWIN45 IVSiRIILTIWL•D 4WING5. - - O EXISTING „T'.:�LF=' O ❑ ❑ , __J yDi kucEADs. 2 FO¢ ° - 3% ..= I SAWOTT OPENING N WALL FOR DLKT. - L�II6 I
MpSTu¢E PR TEGTIDJ- Mfg
[EMEM PIAa1ER
�J CEf 4 FRAMING ABOVE.
- O 4X EXISTING CORRIDOR,. M REOVE C63LRETE SLOE
NO WORK. •--�=• - --0
© ROOF PLAN — . - r — '-si' —r_I_ 5_,_—._-1_`_—� S
A- I/32•=I'-0• N II l�J 1 L�� 1_,
EXISTING O
BIRSHD a '
NO WORK-.
—I� 11� _ —Iv lI 'I{— W II
ALK.
VE fONL?ETE-I -IO SRN A Z
_oil- 3CI I Q wZ
PATCH W41 ARER __J /�0 W O
MECHANICAL WORKNilliiirr -
CORRIDOR —- -'l I -— COWLIDOR EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN X UC.
54WCLR OPENING IN �/ - - Z
FLOOR FOR WCT SHAFT • NEW MECHANICAL SHAFT W
0IL 1 1 ��:� 03
�o. DSeD �'-`�i, ® 2ND FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN �1 2Z
l�6E ,D:' �� RELOCATED A- I/8'=r-0•
I CEILIFIG 4S g F SIN S I PLACES. rg5 RX Z W O
Nam,R N,Y SOILED IRIL. RINGS-` SOILED urn_ f 51N
W g_._,___0 __I le
03300
IIIN A
- 4 413NO o1 CONCRETE NFILLAT I
�" 5EE TIST LTUP.NILDDRPvnirfi.
� NDIT Ow.taSE
A EXISTING CA ICREIE 1 � I LA CA I ce
I NO WORK VU' i BEAM ABOVE,TYP. I �' 'SO'
013
e3RD FLOOR DEMOLITION PLANE yOy 3RD FLOOR RENOVATION PLAN& ", _ _, O
A- d2 I/S•=t'.0• o .. .. l• -[ 4
LoR.
INFANT(ARE STATION .I FS}� r I y I f F _I LICIL
__
L1, ` n I Ell
LLT NINGE SIDE OF OPENING T / '� e�•C '� ,I� TOILET` , ,� TOILEi
F>•••I\ IM rr5TdIR ACE
4¢RooMs TOA,TnS,T�G,�a�T / ENNEUNG•....9I �� �--'� �'� _ L __IL-- '/!a4'•Ir/
A•F B'-0. ` L J �- FE 1I --n• r ' -11 T oo°ol +.•
HEAR. 1 FEWER/EC.WARDROBE. EXISTING p.—._.r-I _alp_
.1 /.j R. � j. .Ir.,,1i i 05501IE lAND11Y{I
II J_ ie
EXISTING HOG OAL WNA • vvs 2 •Era` _, —,
I
5'-O° 5°STP°OEL COLNMNS 7 - �'F= rr FyI ,III_
191
�_ �y� Z�' Z PLACES.SEE 7 ■ C�F.:.�..-� L. �• p ■
GUSTING
DRA.W�TLICn L , -_ • r o • [III_-_'_I ��I1111C, © OO wAlx
O� r—. _ cf.F-..-F� ._ _�
�� �Cp]] �I tjPROJECT NO.
iv
�0�,/�` XI• �1 I■ `t^C14 'I1 f.�,,c, I 88014.10
�— - I O x Nr EXISTING COWMN ' , t11� I� ,I� 11Ii PR.�.T.. ,
ENCLOSURE TO MICE Rmv.B
----- I EXISTING pee°l�,�yu�l A�vE' _ / • _ I I I SITE PLAN REVIEN
I EXIST u AL rim
I viWVANGS FURR A5 PwALLs i�-�_'J •7� E:E
® BED [ONST Ol15nNG[DNCPETE F0JR1O'FO CEI�E I AFTER I I I 5l19/89
BEIOW- I ©IDE PADJASII NATCJf MO¢C ICAL- { ___A. ' Z
pa' BE7Y IDE I_ it F-
-J rIIJ ST4TD nARE NNING WALL
LDR DOOM TM,ROCo 51rt CAR.
LDR ROONS PrY,TOT, P•1 OPPOSITE NAND 1 SIMILAR. ion�� ALIGN Date
EXISTING ,` 1 FEB.t7,19B9
K� LI/ EXISTING CONCRETE _, V Tile.ROOF,
SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ALSO. 4 He $ FLOOR PLANS
© TYPICAL LDR PLAN 208 9 Q SITE PLAN 2ND FLOOR RENOVATION PLAN Sheet�N 1•=30' ® ® A-2
I■I■I■I■Il111.1.I•I■I111I■II ROOF DEFY I■I■EI■I■I■IIIME1.I!I■I11I•I■111111 II o
WPSI FcLAa, ill FR n■ � II ! II Hi II ■tII g Ito I � THIRD FLOOR II 4iN1
16 , Z
4XPVRNyLWNNDIuuv. %ISTING •• - O0`IIill1LiiluiIIDII1I
z zIIHifflhiIIIiIIffluI I5TNG
,- d SECOND FLOOR __ — D • 2.e0STINGG COLUM
®
u
NORTH ELEVATION . WEST ELEVATION G
e•=r-o• 1/B =r-o• - r
4 4 Q ° 4 Q 4' Q 4 • ID
U 11 ROOF DECK (Il I I II I I III II II I1 II II I I II l l 1l I I II I I I I_U-II JII I I I1 I I
IKISTMG �• � T'v CAWS - m - - - - - ? - Z
5T¢UCTURE O
THIRD FLOO¢ E.
-- --
�E%15TNG CowMNS m — — CI�
- - I gi
�j X '4a¢ 11 -,1_�- -1 Z
LDR is mrluc T Low �."e
1. 1 SECOND FLOOR $ — . .�. i , i— . LL U Z
C'_J ="- ` = EXISTING CLILlI N FOOTING TO RFI4AIN,T{PICAL NEW CONSTRICTION/I`EXISTING STRUCTURE U
gm BUILDING SECTION T EAST ELEVATION W °3
1/8•=1•-0• \I 1/8-=1•-0• I--- z
100.Er.. FAME TOWEL DISGWSER Z >ICI)
�I✓ FDRRED SOFFIT VAN,UiOSOS I5PEN5ER W 5 pC
SCE AD4•.9.1 FOR GOOD N WIWI1NG 0 ACK., \/
ADDTONAL • NDR3E gqyy1ST
� � P1iUIPMENT. EMERGENC! FTACL¢FLEPT. \'"0741 =
�6000:! 50
pUPLEX RED=yT••• 1- GIME RSiFJI'ER
AALLTTEENATE D: v �—� 'WIND —I MREORNNW B ND5p(_�/1J 1. VAW M�/TLeT U� -- RJ TATIO0020 ,= . I...AT�OURET / A9E LAVATORY FOOT CONTROLS
I--•° .� ICRAiH RAIL I 24..k4.I� I l
1 n NORTH SOUTH • rY"•T
e TYPICAL LDR 204, 206, 208 OPPOSITE HAND: 205, 207, 209 `"
1/4• r-o- b✓
ameNtra.
4 y 1jj}}7�•14y l 7}}}y y� O
iMath!TTRAM15000 DOUPLE co/AP K t:MOOT OINK. 1
100L0 'M TI ARV NAPKIN bFPF TD
1000 ="" B• RODE NOOK, DISPOSAL 10Edo
%E lALL ISOOD 711
TOITOILER SEAOYa�155ER ` 2A° 1A 21° WSEWORK. 1J100 • BEBE =CW'1EVJ0�. I
_ _ SHOWER CUNIG PLgSnCPROJECT NO.
�i.E AP GEE y _ - GRAB DA¢00i R fu• _� � I_,�I � 51NIC .—���"a T rrRevisions
IW1TE p14 10
- _J SINK 1 PANELDISPEN5ER. I o�In GILDING SHOWER 100p9 —• '1{r� � �7y1 SITE PLAN REVIEW
t 1 1E41 5000 -. E■fjili _Mat E CASEWWGRY-_N•___ SEAT 3j SOAP DISH WATER CLOSET T 0.. iON. P R. 0 L D TENSER 5/19/89
NORTH SOUTH NORTH 07E05 SOOO DISPENSER NORTH IOBOS 504P DISPENSER
e TYPICAL TOILET 204A, 206A, 208A OPPOSITE HAND: 205A, 207A, 209A ak SOILED UTILITY 203 dm CLEAN UTILITY 202
1/4•=1'-0• ® 1/4•=I-o• 1/4•=BO'
Drawn Checked
5E5
O n o o O D T_ • n _ OR
0 0 0 o Date
TYP. D " FEB.17.1989
IT ______[. I1I� xO SLG.D.t. 105.STINGWSNER�Q k i �1 I PATCH WALL
I M .-.I .[I CAduET H' [ 1 y -.ELEVATIONS
4 VESTBLIE C200 t CORRIDOR COO 'I WEST NORTH EAST JJJ< CORROCR�1 VES1EL E C200 ' ...BUILDING
SECTION
e CORRIDOR C201/VESTIBULE C200 5hoot A-3
1/8•=1.-0.
7
k
hildb4 1 ri i !r i
,._,-----
'''19-14Iti\--.,„ ,k, , IhinhIldiO1111/11t 1 i
411 li �_ *ram °°°°..9�Dx.11 ©`' • �•
Mr•
E. `
---____, t ;
±�f-- :,
luwaw e�ua33 �I i `
zzzZzzzzzzZzz ,i -f.i,i .,i r.guo.umaILt"..i1lI %'Ir44''11'
, . ,k 7 I•. , R *Ij,�,� `,``. l
°o9rcmF»3x�N /�./ 7RE � \ OIL� �f{�'�� ��. itilt —
k
,itk
,r o A 68 R B A d —IilrltMw::r-A,--,Xf-_--_'-"_--"_----,\
9 / 0,''.I ..F.T..:oI,i� ,� ak, j a'1 4- i ,�`''' Y `;"-• \\...�y ' 0 �" 1 s r
0ftt -- - ,tftlkiwil4tp7,--4,1
,,.-- ilt
‘,
•
,.. , ,„. "„ 4,
�_� �06�.° .� I ��.�^ , _••//ram`' 71.14- i �-,.. '/ '.E�� � 1�: �..�� QQ\Q\\ �� c ll�
77-:- d44zaza 1 I ^ - t . .���: e I /"' _min O •/ 'r:• e�+lo . m \ .,I
a
I
g. .... ley 1 717. e:,.0)7cm o- 4.♦• . 1�{ /_ ZSi �, :' ru•T• / tih
- - - •�1III4� ... w•Ma.-nel r
,�, c)4I91 alav o I IF
n F W ,�}/.<w TT^ ' , A��� 6',ac s»� áL!'
Oilitg-:----- -- - -•:--2,14t. ' . • C), ,•1 I: ,t1, r i11\°'7 itr ` ' �� I...„.. /7?6,,,,,,,..-?,.,--1..)
�i ��II..c iLL
\—�,`\\ `••il•, ma / 5.1 SEW MI•S- \ ` .. ��� 1
'. i
d �.. �. �1 j .' l. r;� RIM EL-.C•G.7 6 i.wE . Il ar
�� / , IIIWL
1 d i ,' k ./-- ,,,,,„...,,
: ,-,;•„ e'irikt-----k \ (' `� "•.heiti 41- / iz•,A - sasl / vc��Wc At
/• y� *'C.� N ,
•,.r r •' x
,k..,:tr, ,„.., . .„ ilij!.,\.z.
.,
. ,,, ,
1
1 _
-sE.. att IP , •.
ue �V` � ,��� .I
,., '''.--4?/' 774-;6;4a, _747 .:4,1/4---_,,, 1 .
A ` C . l'' �` L. r4 a. �6.�,:_ (W)s. .A' a d :a, ,•-.kwm—
/� ,. -��' 7 Si' .. ^ ��.� \�.�,•'�t'r.,�1 /� � � � I�m.re Y SITE PLAN PFyIEIA
J / ,/ // v. „. 5179/89
/ , ¢ DIsw1I O.d.d
_ °/ 1 AT ..„,
r.......„),,,L
�yT. • 1 I n,I..� .•�-- .,SGW Ma•N• RiMEL- fin
I �I.�r� �������� rUM -'rl r: a^vvc C.1)TzN O!
a wcW�zy
SpN s>�J Ma•l: ISN•c(s)71/ i
ad..-
Ili I Sal gu w->• lb-1 lk„y._. '`-p:�.! c PVC(s)9774- 7W A A.YJ
wME E4 Ps: ` a•vvC w)sr1�I BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
m..(G)IT+s ...,gags snW SW •c
MEL•SYIC• SITE PLAN
12'(P1C(N)IT50 R1M 6--Ycv. .�N�aL M!•D•
6a.¢iJC Cs)t7.al s..
6'?VG CE)G4. IrG,GG CW)um mY(NJN NM RIMA-<574 3L.V� . I •Ge'-d
5 WACO)zcab a'CPC(SE)z141 IL'CdGCs)aTT Al
e-m+c C•t)sl lz cur<eo IvCO.C.CW)errs Per-CM,S� ..
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 16, 1989
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2,800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospital
SITE AREA 5,500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2,800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
2 . Air °
3 . Water
4 . Plants °
5. Animals °
°
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
7. Environmental Health °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
9.. Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
14 . Transportation °
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 ,800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
-"-- _—."
•
4=
AA..
REP .
-, T i )
'"iriFil.ii \\ t 1 t :1 \ ,. A'-'''''''6.• •..
Illiiiiir
?1,40 A o \ \ ' g V (/ i 4iWiit/ '
/ R
'IS '
''',, \ ) 1\ r/flit
--.:‘:'40,,
.., __,_U ,,,S) I # . ',., ) i'
1 -41,./ C
1 ,...,,,,_ iiiif• 0
/I
T. ic , 4 ( I r N.-;I:'/ p_ :---
-7 _7..-r, , :.
•11/ ,44,,,
.4.---.... ' --I. ---- • - , J C4.`"- - . 1, 1 .. t )1 • _ _J
Pq 401 / D'.- 7‘-' '.. -- -k)7. (Y \ . k I.- ,_,,, _ , 0
,..!,.. .,,,_:,. '.10 63it ,..i.... .. ..-- -
`al'A i....,;,49.2—\\\ _.0 :-,-..."- ''.-.-.• ......' 04 ',-- ., , li T •%,- 'ip I
/-- , .—
) --,-- ib'-::' . . ,;,_---; :: „2,:-/ /.: ,i_,;,/,...- ,:-4‘,..,.: : . ...,,
'-
. '''',.Z1:--..--k4V%i
" , -' titt f- ..;-- .1,- , ,:-,, .:c... /. ' 6' '.-" „,,,,,.;,
VaR.4 ,/ II r•\ --i- -.-.--:*., '?,I --- „;:,, _-_-_- r/- __-1, ;,:7,I ,,' ' '' '-'-,:---/'•. — ,-.I-'' -4 111_111hilli : li i 1 I
,.....___. •
1''t ir.,1
' K 11-0' t \ j- 2; Olf. -i - _.: -',P "''''-'-'- 4- -= " .' '/ _gr:x..#1•',:. itit) ,':'
,.
1
.t.‘4-',.11:1-',1'.
r\s,5 1,1_ ..,..,..!.s ,,,.--..--,, ::.. ._--„,- -.-... ---- ' - ___ .---2-'' • -. ,--.. _ - ' , „44.:,-,'„,,d'n '--: ----:-7 --:: • -
''''*•.i' 8 r './-'1',.' ',.- -,,-,_'' . " 1 ,1- - ' :- ti i,4.-- r I ,---,-. Artii,i,-, ./--::-
1 /- - - F.",, ., . : ,‘,, , , .,_
I '''\,.\' - '=, 1 .,„tat -:.!._----- *
9 .-e'l
P i '# ' / iii;.....g., ",,,4,:-..,f .-
. ?;-- -
*_:-..14 0:4 ,____, ,,,..) , f‘ ,... 4, V. - ' - - .4._ --.:: ( - *-•
%L.,.::=ii-&,- i -'
[
....:,,:t.i?... t . ,,....„17,... .,..,...,.,,, ,_ ,„1„, ,,,,„* „.,. __:___:„5„z__„_ .,,..,__.7_,,, . ,,,.,_,. „: 1 .,,.... .
i116. , . , , .. .. ,.. . .. ,0* ,
'- -- 1.1"......., i"-,--"'-',..-:.-----•,,."„„
.) ------ .,
0/,,,
_.... / 7.':l''•I''''., ' r-----__ -:„-co------------,... , --, ,-,,,,i, .. ,: ..„„4,,,,..; Ap......0 4
T.',,1'1 `, '-,V.'-2,,, ,,Ir 0 ,4/',--;•, ,,LY_-_,..,,i'//`,?. -T,,/ ,/ /,'7,,, o--''''' ' (1. ':': ' ''• •.;tillgri..'
//
//
*_
- --,"--- -- r -,6-•7%i1 t, / .i i .,'., „-/4.1, \ 1 , / .;')
- V ,.,,,,,:.:. §, gr,..34:-,.., /71„/ __::,,
. • °:,,i).-6:44,:- 1 :/../r-: :.,•70-1:16; F, ;,7, ,_-,/2:1::,„,'
L__---.. k, . 4, -//,, ,,, , . 1.162:;_,. I..-i ,,-',FJ ,13.i,,,,''f,: 'I 'O'I'-1 '-' 7'11'!i --i
, __1__ ,,;,,,--. __V4ftli. 1, '','. " $1,t,'' T..5',',. .!,. .." _:-.&_i .
\
- --'1. 17. --4:-... 1 1 il',"'''. -;''''''i,.:-1'''',:‘.,ii,.,7,/'...:,•••••...1 ht;/// - / .' ...:/ --kw
- ,T.-4 ••f' ' °O 7" --- tA ' , - 'i'E. > ---- ,..',igi ' -1 " iiii-i :',' ;:iir /
1
i i:-.1NAii44.----'".--, i 4T--; "..-. ..'.; / .W,,-/, /..._,./ .7- _-; ::j0 ,r.._iib‘
h, is* ,--,i; ,',,••'1,,. ,....--,
lk
< , , ,,,„
'',--•':,/ - —/ -1.1fr '(
?,3, '"- ' ' 147-,,./„---__ ' q' § ss-iii.
:ii:u3Z- '' , • ,s,. °TO, q ' --1 4,7 ,••. (i---11.-0, *. -0--,k -,, 7 ---- li,./.
A ,
11*. ,lit ,/, , '3", ,,,,,;.1 ----_,, ----. -- - • ,,,-----_...)• v . .-..
--..
' --4/, /,,,,,,,,,,,7.''49,,!_irk i 4 ----•, /.41/ --;-----_,_. .17:::''; -! ,:, .,'.1-.:qi- /1 \-- sill i. " a 1-1189°..i#8 8 6 8 64 44
' -"'.41844 •' - - ;.:z :• if,
g LLz,..zr.........
7 ,, ' i 1('; * -• --1/,-.20 1 ' :II 11111111111i1
///, *„) RI,,?„, gil --.-',5-. ,•:/:wv/•.0 t,zi',E 0 \ - -, * :- -,., i ,• — -•--'..,, ,-4 to 2. 1 a p p ,/,-„.5....--..../dn : 1 ,. iiii51/ 4ii!i
,_ ,,,, . (55 • /, v A ''- /5 0 ' ?1 • 5' .- ..74141rai*e.'''''a','''')it'' '''-.7 ''•--', vi i ,
5 ,
i 1111t1!/11;11
. ,, .\,... „.„-.0,- .„/ 4 giotr'\ ttfiRgRioll pe*4 I al
'''"I' IR:- ii;.• o Ei. riik "--11/- ;'''-',•,$)24',T2----''1111‘. •Oi. '
:--.__ .40 * .' --2' •.0.1140r*******;
r
!IIIIIIIiiiiiiiiii01111
„
t t 11 ti
a 1 g
L
I eg
rig;
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER MAI-ILUM&NORDFOR.S
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION ARCHITECTURE•FACILITY PLANNINTE
RIORS
444 l; EP*
Z i 1 P
< —_,
..--
400 South 43rd Street Renton,WA .88055•228-3450 2505 Third Avenue,Seattle,WA 98121•(206)4414151
__
a$ 0 CITY OF RENTON
"LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director
MEMORANDUM
DATE : September 7 , 1989
TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk
FROM: SaCeger, Planning
RE : Valley Medical Center
SA-047-89
With this memo I am transmitting the above referenced file to
your office.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
f /
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION
APPLICATION NO. : SA-047-89
APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center, Public Hospital
District #1
LOCATION: Located at 400 South 43rd Street.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for site plan approval to
allow the construction of an addition to
the existing birth center, approximately
2800 square feet in size. The addition
is located in the N.E. corner of the
hospital.
COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 10:00 a.m.
on, July 5, 1989, in the third floor
conference room of the Renton Municipal
Building.
The Committee review was conducted after receiving written
comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all
divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire,
Police, and Parks Departments.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application,
proof of posting and publication and
other documentation pertinent to this
request.
Exhibit No. 2 ' Site plan and Landscape Plan (dated June
8, 1989) .
Exhibit No. 3 Roof and Floor Plans (dated May 24,
1989) .
Exhibit No. 4 Elevations and Building Section (dated
May 24, 1989) .
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan
Review Committee now makes and enters; the following:
- I
Findings:
1. The applicant, Valley Medical Center, Public Health District
No.1, requests site plan approval to allow the construction
of a 2800 square foot addition to the birth center located
in the northeast corner of the hospital. The project will
add six (6) new Labor Delivery Recovery Rooms beneath what
is now known as the 3E patient wing. The expansion under
this wing of the hospital will stay within the existing
footprint of the building, extending the existing walls
downward to the ground, adding three new walls. The
applicant proposes to continue the wall and window pattern
of the existing hospital. The applicant will be restoring
planting beds in the immediate area of the project which
will be disturbed during construction.
f
Site Plan Review L_____mittee
Report and Decision
July 5, 1989
Page 2
2 . The applicant's file containing the application, the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments
from various City departments, the public notices requesting
citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered
as Exhibit No. 1.
3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and
SEPA (RCW 43 . 21C, 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non-
Significance was issued for the subject proposal on July 5,
1989.
4 . Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City
departments affected by the impact of this proposal.
6. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1959 by the
Adoption of Ordinance No.. 1743. The site was rezoned from G
to P-1, Public Use, on July 17, 1967, by the adoption of
Ordinance No. 8345.
7. The site is surrounded by the following land uses: the Brain
Building and the Chin Hills office building to the north;
medical offices to the east; and the hospital and hospital
campus to the south and west.
8. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for
information for site plan review.
9. The Site Plan Review Ordinance, under Section 4-738 (D, 1) ,
lists ten criteria that the Site Plan Review Committee is
asked to consider along with all other relevant information
in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application.
These criteria are as follows:
a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements
and policies;
The subject proposal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan designation of Public/Quasi Public.
This category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended for
publicly owned and certain privately owned uses,
including hospitals other health care facilities.
The health care policies of listed under Section IX(G)
states that adequate health care and social services
• should be available. Specifically policy No. 1 states
" Hospitals should be located and designed to serve the
residents efficiently. " (p.26 of Comprehensive Plan
Compendium, 1986) .
The proposal complies with the health care facilities
goal and policies related to the project.
b. Conformance with existing land use regulations;
The subject proposal is consistent with the zoning
designation on the propertyjof P-1, Public Use. The
proposal is an addition which extends the walls of the
third (3rd) floor wing downward on three sides to
enclose space to be used for the extension of the
second (2nd) floor. The proposal will stay within the
footprint of the building. ' Thus, the proposal is not
encroaching into required setbacks or exceeding the
height limit of fifty feet in the zone.
The addition will require approximately two (2) parking
stalls as specified in the Parking and Loading
Ordinance, which requires one parking space for every
three beds, for each doctor, and for every three
employees. The applicant is not proposing any
Site Plan Review L mittee
Report and Decision
July 5, 1989
Page 3
additions to the parking lots to accommodate parking
for the addition since the number of parking stalls on
campus exceed the number of stalls required by code for
the hospital complex. The applicant's proposal is to
add six (6) beds and to use existing staff to service
the additional space. The applicant does not
anticipate using all the labor/delivery rooms in the
Birth Center at the same time.
c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and
uses;
The proposal, as discussed above, is an infill project
which extends existing walls to enclose space for the
addition but does not extend beyond the existing
footprint of the building. The proposal will not
interfere with views or create light and glare impacts
to adjacent uses.
d. Mitigation of Impacts of a Proposed Site Plan to the
Site:
The applicant's proposal is to extend existing walls,
continuing the same facade treatment as the existing
hospital walls. Existing landscaped_ areas will be
disturbed during construction which shall be restored
as shown on the landscaping plans.
The project will follow the existing grade with some
grading required for access areas. The applicant
proposes using erosion control measures during
construction, should the possibility of erosion become
a problem during construction.
e. Conservation of area-wide property values;
The birth center addition is not anticipated to
negatively impact area-wide property values.
f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian
circulation;
The proposal will not be impacting the existing vehicle
circulation in adjacent parking areas since no
additional parking spaces are required to be
constructed as a result of the project.
With respect to pedestrian circulation, the applicant
proposes extending the walkway along the east side of
the building northward to the end of the addition and
then westward to the existing stairs.
g. Provision of adequate light and air;
The proposed addition due to the design and location of
the project site, provides sufficient light and air for
the project and will not interfere with the light and
air of nearby portions of the hospital building or
other uses.
h. Mitigation of noise, odors. and other harmful or
unhealthy conditions;
The subject proposal will not result in any adverse
noise, odors or other harmful conditions. It is
acknowledged that there will be an incremental increase
in noise and an increase in the levels of carbon
dioxide with the additional vehicles added to the area.
Site Plan Review wnimittee
Report and Decision
July . 5, 1989
Page 4
i. Availability of public services and facilities to
accommodate the proposed use; and
The subject property is adequately serviced with public
services. The hospital campus has a network of
sanitary sewer and water lines running throughout the
campus, tying the existing water and sewer lines
located along Talbot Road South and South 43rd Street
to the hospital and other campus buildings.
j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight.
The construction of the addition is not expected to
have any detrimental impact on the neighborhood which
might result in neighborhood deterioration and blight. •
10. With respect to traffic impacts, the proposal is
expected to generate approximately 47 trips. This
traffic can be accommodated on adjacent roadways and
will not trigger the necessary improvements to the
hospital campus circulation and adjacent roadways
(Talbot Rd. S. and S. 43rd St. ) , which have been
discussed by staff in submitted comments and staff
discussions.
Conclusions:
1. The subject proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan
policies for health care facilities. Further, the project
is in compliance with the iwht The project is Comprehensive
• Plan Map designation of Public/Quasi-Public and the Zoning
Map designation of Public Use for the site.
2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and
focused on were:
a. Traffic impacts.
b. Compliance with parking code requirements.
4 . This is an irfill project which is adequately served by
public services.
5. Construction activity will require work in existing
landscaping. The applicant proposes restoring vegetation
and irrigation systems in the planting beds located near the
west, north and east sides of the new addition.
The proposed landscaping plan is compatible with existing
landscaping and meets City code requirements for such
landscaped areas.
6. The proposal will require two (2) parking stalls. These
additional two, plus the number of parking stalls currently •
available on the hospital campus are sufficient to meet
current needs and provide a surplus number of stalls to
accommodate some future uses.
7 . The amount of traffic generated by the new addition can be
accommodated on existing roadways. The applicant will not
be required to construct any off-site improvements along
Talbot Road South or S. 43rd St as a result of this project.
8. The facade treatment and pattern for the addition is
compatible with the treatment on the esxisting walls of the
hospital structure.
9. The proposed use is a continuation of the existing birth
center.
Site Plan Review r. ___,;mittee
Report and Decision
July 5, 1989
Page 5
9. The proposed use is a continuation of the existing birth
center.
8. The site plan has minor impacts to surrounding uses and
properties, facade treatment meets that the hospital
building, and minor traffic impacts. Therefore, the project
is not detrimental to the public health and safety and
should be approved.
Decision:
The site plan for the Birth Center extension for Valley Medical
Center, file no. SA-047-89, is approved.
For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall"
are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered
discretionary.
Notes to Applicant:
An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold
the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work
begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or
for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work
required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state,
may begin construction activities with the issuance_.of the proper
permits.
ORDERED this 10th day of July, 1 9, on half of the : - an
Review Committee.
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
TRANSMITTED this 10th day of July, 1989, to the parties of
record:
Todd Olson
Mahlum & Nordfors Architects
2505 Third Avenue, Suite 219
Seattle, .WA 98112
Monica Brennan
Valley Medical Center
400 South 43rd Street
Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED this 10th day of July, 1989, to the following:
Mayor Earl Clymer
Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director
Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director
Larry Springer, Planning Manager
Ronald Nelson, Building Director
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Valley Daily News
Site Plan Review i- mittee
Report and Decision
July 5, 1989
Page 6
REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or
before July 24, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous
procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the
discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning
Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within
fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee
may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems
proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests
for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for
consideration at the same time as the appeal.
•
AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV,
Section 3011 (B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed
directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in
writing before 5 p.m. on July 24, 1989, accompanied by a $75. 00
fee and other, specific requirements.
THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte
(private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use
decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee
decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as
Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the
decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning
Administrator. All communications are public record and this
permits all interested parties to know the contents of the
communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence
in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the
invalidation of the request by the Court.
•
•
•
Agik
WOWashington State Duane Berentson
Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation
District 1
15325 S.E.30th Place
Bellevue,Washington 98007-6538
(206)562-4000
July.. 20;„ 1989
Don Erickson 'Di JUL 2 i 1989
Zoning Administrator I`
Planning Division F'
CommunityDevelopment Department 11 `�
p P
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055 _
SR 167 MP 24. 53 CS 1766
Determination of Non-Significance
Valley Medical Center
File No. SA-047-89
Dear Mr. Erickson:
This letter is in response to the Determination of Non
Significance we received from the city of Renton dated July
5, 1989.
The proposal is for the construction of a 2,800 square foot
addition to the existing Birth Center on the second floor of
the hospital.
Since the timing on this project is short, the Department of
Transportation concurs with the mitigation measures
recommended by the ERC.
However because of the nature of the project, the Department
of Transportation would have recommended that the developer
commission a traffic study to determine if 10 or more peak
hour trips (AM or PM) , will travel through a single state
intersection. If this condition is found to be true, a
traffic analysis should be prepared using current volumes at
the intersection(s) . The analysis should calculate the LOS
at the intersections impacted by 10 or more peak hour trips
for the existing condition and the design year of the
development. The analysis should include figures
illustrating directional distribution, background traffic,
development traffic, and future traffic. The analysis
should assess the need for mitigation, check the turning
radii for the types of vehicles utilizing the development,
and check the sight distances at each intersection.
1 IF
I
Don Erickson
July 20, 1989
Page 2
If the traffic study does show an impact at a state highway
intersection, the Department of Transportation would
appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the
mitigation measures proposed in the traffic study.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this
proposal. Should you have any questions and/or concerns,
please feel free to call Donald Hurter ( 562-4274) or Dick
Aust ( 562-4274) of my Developer section, or myself ( 562-
4267) .
Sinc-rely,
J/, ► ES L. LUTZ, .E.
silities/Developer
ervices Engineer
DA:da
cc: WSDOT State Aid - MS 121
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND DECISION
APPLICATION NO. : SA-047-89
APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center, Public Hospital
District #1
LOCATION: Located at 400 South 43rd Street.
{ •
•
JET>oJ.��1' J �erygr`_ip n
-\ C Mvh'vr[-wom y ma[
DG-ilJM: Jor...rv-m.o P n
•m•..1. . .gmeD..., �m JTsi�J-n7 Jr7ro.mJ-
1&IA .aa._lo-A a.r aa.nT.owr w.r wrt000.nw v J Nnww[ o.r4
• 1A�1 ..1L..I, muow J.smote.( , mir J Mm� :�'v�'
Ne.%Y,wC:.1 M w>r t a+.d 7.: m¢•'J-=
• T (i .1 .4,-7-�•ois m•J-m'w
.� � 1 • a Jm..a.J-r.�m
I `/1 / ' %-" �� mil
-.7/
\\ 411' N ....,\11\- ttk" ,,,,07
nart A . •. ,,,...ft,0. aihr R 46:14
1 .
dy'ii,..r".nti. ifi_,, 1'764- 1 , :i4 f
i i t '.... .../.i 47/ it.. V .-474" i a . 1 , , ../
s.34 40,* _ .. , zr.11 ---4, ;. 1„, k RP 1 ja, . s
il ' ,- 1 .., .' 71 .1.,,r:- 4\1'- ail I:: I. ...."°"rt-.s,,,,,,. --*LE-Ifi."----1-4°'
4
, ,.
„, ,. .117
, , ,•,, .N. ..., ,. 1
INK1pw , ...
„ 1 1, vv.z. .,„;:;.... .,,I.,. ...2/11..
:,...r, t ,, 0 _ ., /..1 1.4,„ . - f yi.c,„..,14 —a—--. I. F....--1,ii ----•; .
. 4„ ••:•t,,,, ... .4. ',ti, .7 ... *7‘ZN.,....4 44,41/ ;...„
. , :.„ ;,$ /Jr i,,.. pi? ,4,000.7;,.. „,.....„,,,,,.„..,..„Agys i /--- i'll
477/. (key.: ..„1 / / 1-:-/4 i
y.tio,40/ 4 ,It ;#...._ '// //i 1 ? • ink ',A.`
il ,it
to I' ' It .- -1' A "•4?-- or )-I /
�-+10t1 - e•'��,/� f.! _ flik
= 1� ` /14141
1 .j \ h. � v / kAi. -�
l'WV.
;:f / •calf ,,A/ • s .; I
f . //34, .11p
if
0• I r,i,� 7 ! ' ttv.41i. :e fi` v ek .'!r e 2 - `e ms
+E r ...� �l o ii r11, r� .`Aw`
i iF r . •; ° o o • r, 1 .._.
* r +.J,,//A„...mo\ :f ' •'u o 1 l L.
"°
14;1 ,,ri ;, 4.4./,,,,.„. ,.., - z• -ft ,.-,. Setik,,, i? 1. -
r,
,, ';'':::;1; q '• / -. 'I.i i . e. . :.1.i'it# A-5,447
I „� Y �C' 4+►ego.. •
it3
N.T.s..s.4YT.w L raS.t1lC4_92•1 w.•^i•t-mm.
11
NI
> > i f VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER MAHLUM&NORDFOR$
-+ _ nr.n NA)vrEwou
s Axton. _ WA h:re.. :sm naa/.w.w•Sd.,.w will•lfld Ml•Il3l
Site Plan Revi -T . mmittee
Report and Dec ion
• .July 5, 1989 -
Page 2
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Application for site plan approval to
allow the construction of an addition to
the existing birth center, approximately
2800 square feet in size. The addition
is located in the N.E. corner of the
hospital.
COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 10: 00 a.m.
• on', July 5, 1989, in the third floor
conference room of the Renton Municipal
Building.
The Committee review was conducted after receiving written
comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all
divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire,
Police, and Parks Departments.
The following exhibits were entered into the record:
Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application,
proof of posting and publication and
other documentation pertinent to this
request.
Exhibit No. 2 Site plan and Landscape Plan (dated June
8, 1989) .
Exhibit No. 3 Roof and Floor Plans (dated May 24,
1989) .
Exhibit No. 4 Elevations and Building Section (dated
May, 24, 1989) .
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION
Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan
Review Committee now makes and enters the following:
Findings:
1. The applicant, Valley Medical Center, Public Health District
No. 1, requests site plan approval to allow the construction
of a 2800 square foot addition to the birth center located
in the northeast corner of the hospital. The project will
add six (6) new Labor Delivery Recovery Rooms beneath what
is now known as the 3E patient wing. The expansion under
this wing of the hospital will stay within the existing
footprint of the building, extending the existing walls
downward to the ground, adding three new walls. The
applicant proposes to continue the wall and window pattern
of the existing hospital. The applicant will be restoring
planting beds in the immediate area of the project which
will be disturbed during construction.
2 . The applicant's file containing the application, the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments
from various City departments, the public notices requesting
citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered
as Exhibit No. 1.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and
SEPA (RCW 43 .21C, 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non-
Significance was issued for the subject proposal on July 5,
1989.
4 . Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City
departments affected by the impact of this proposal.
Site Plan Revi C miittee
t,c.;;
Report and Dec _;ion'
July 5, 1989
Page 3
6. The subject site was annexed into the City in 1959 by the
Adoption of Ordinance No. 1743 . The site was rezoned from G
to P-1, Public Use, on; July 17, 1967, by the adoption of
Ordinance No. 8345. 1 }
7. The site is surrounded by the following land uses: the Brain
Building and the Chin Hills office building to the north;
medical offices to theleast; and the hospital and hospital
campus to the south and west.
8. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for ,
information for site plan review.
9 . The Site Plan Review Ordinance, under Section 4-738 (D, 1) ,
lists ten criteria that the Site Plan Review Committee is
asked to consider along with all other relevant information
in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application.
These criteria are as follows:
a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements
and policies;
The subject proposal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan designation of Public/Quasi Public.
This category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended for
publicly owned and certain privately owned uses,
including hospitals other health care facilities.
b. Conformance with existing land use regulations;
The subject proposal is consistent with the zoning
designation on the property of P-1, Public Use. The
proposal is an addition which extends the walls of the
third (3rd) floor wing downward on three sides to
enclose space to be used for the extension of the
second (2nd) floor. The proposal will stay within the
footprint of the building. Thus, the proposal is not
encroaching into required setbacks or exceeding the
height limit of fifty feet in the zone.
With respect to traffic impacts, the proposal is
expected to generate approximately 47 trips. This
traffic can be accommodated on adjacent roadways and
will not trigger the necessary improvements to the
hospital campus circulation and adjacent roadways
(Talbot Rd. S. and S. 43rd St. ) , which have been
discussed by staff in submitted comments and staff
discussions.
The addition will require approximately two (2) parking
stalls as specified in the Parking and Loading
Ordinance, which requires one parking space for every
three beds, for each doctor, and for every three
employees. The, applicant is not proposing any
additions to the parking lots to accommodate parking
for the addition since the number of parking stalls on
campus exceed the number of stalls required by code for
the hospital complex. The applicant's proposal is to
add six (6) beds and to use existing staff to service
the additional space. The applicant does not
anticipate using all the labor/delivery rooms in the
Birth Center at the same time.
Site Plan Revi nnittee
Report and Dec'., _..Lon
July 5, 1989
Page 4
c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and
uses;
The proposal, as discussed above, is an infill project
which extends existing walls to enclose space for the
addition but does1not extend beyond the existing
footprint of the building. The proposal will not
interfere with views or create light and glare impacts
to adjacent uses.
d. Mitigation of Impacts of a Proposed Site Plan to the
Site:
The applicant's proposal is to extend existing walls,
continuing the same facade treatment as the existing
hospital walls. Existing landscaped areas will be
disturbed during construction which shall be restored
as shown on the landscaping plans.
The project will follow the existing grade with some
grading required for access areas. ,The applicant
proposes using erosion control measures during
construction, should the possibility of erosion become
a problem during construction.
e. Conservation of area-wide property values;
The birth center addition is not anticipated to
negatively impact area-wide property values. .
• f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian
circulation;
The proposal will not be impacting the existing vehicle
circulation in adjacent parking areas since no
additional parking spaces are required to be
constructed as a result of the project.
With respect to pedestrian circulation, the applicant
proposes extending the walkway along the east side of
the building northward to the end of the addition and
then westward to the existing stairs. Extension of
walkway to paring lot? .
g. Provision of adequate light and air;
The proposed addition due to the design and location of
the project site, provides sufficient light and air for
the project and will not interfere with the light and
air of nearby portions of the hospital building or
other uses.
h. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or
unhealthy conditions;
The subject proposal will not result in any adverse
noise, odors or other harmful conditions. It is
acknowledged that there will be an incremental increase
in noise and an increase in the levels of carbon
dioxide with the additional vehicles added to the area.
No special mitigation is required for noise during the
construction period.
i. Availability of public services and facilities to
accommodate the proposed use; and
1 ,
Site Plan Rev! C nittee
Report and Dec= ion
'July 5, 1989
Page 5
The subject property is adequately serviced with public
services. The hospital campus has a network of
sanitary sewer and. water lines running throughout the
campus, tying the: existing water and sewer lines
located along Talbot Road South and South 43rd Street
to the hospital and other campus buildings.
j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight.
The construction of the addition is not expected to
have any detrimental impact on the neighborhood which
might result in neighborhood deterioration and blight.
Conclusions:
1. The subject proposal generally complies with the
Comprehensive Plan policies for public/quasi-public
developments.
2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and
focused on were:
a. Traffic impacts.
b: Compliance with parking code requirements.
3 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan
designation of Public/Quasi-Public and the zoning
designation of Public Use for the site.
4 . This is an infill project which is adequately served by
public services.
5. Construction activity will require work in existing
landscaping. The applicant proposes restoring vegetation
and irrigation systems in the planting beds located near the
west, north and east sides of the new addition.
6. The proposal will require fourteen (14) parking stalls which
can be met by the construction of two (2) additional parking
stalls. These additional two, plus the number of parking
stalls currently available on the hospital campus are
sufficient to meet current needs and provide a surplus
number of stalls to accommodate some future uses.
7 . The amount of traffic generated by the new addition can be
accommodated on existing roadways. The applicant will not
be required to construct any off-site improvements along
Talbot Road South or S. 43rd St as a result of this project.
8. The site plan has minor impacts to surrounding uses and
properties, facade treatment meets that the hospital
building, and minor traffic impacts. Therefore, the project
is not detrimental to the public health and safety and
should be approved.. .
Decision:
The site plan for the Birth Center extension for Valley Medical
Center, file no. SA-047-89, is approved.
For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall"
are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered
discretionary.
Site Plan Revs;- . `~ ittee
Report and Dec. ioi
July 5, 1989
Page 6
Notes to Applicant:
An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold
the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work
begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or
for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work
required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state,
may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper
permits.
ORDERED this 10th day of July, 1989, on behalf of the Site Plan
Review Committee.
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
TRANSMITTED this 10th day of July, 1989, to the parties of
record:
Todd Olson
Mahlum & Nordfors Architects
2505 Third Avenue, Suite 219
Seattle, WA 98112
Monica Brennan
Valley Medical Center
400 South 43rd Street
Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED this 10th day of July, 1989, to the following:
Mayor Earl Clymer
Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director
Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director
Larry Springer, Planning Manager
Ronald Nelson, Building Director
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Members, Renton Planning Commission
Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Valley Daily News
REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or
before July 20, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous
procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the
discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning
Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within
fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth
specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee
may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems
proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests
for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for
consideration at the same time as the appeal.
AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV,
Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed
directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in
writing before 5 p.m. on July 20, 1989, accompanied by a $75. 00
fee and other specific requirements.
Site Plan Review C'-`nittee
Report and Dec ion"'
. July 5, 1989 -
Page 7
THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte
(private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use
decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee
decision, but to all Request. for Reconsideration as well as
Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the
decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning-
Administrator. All communications are public record and this
permits all interested parties to know the contents of the
communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence
in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the
invalidation of the request' by the Court.
1 _
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-047-89
APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
Birth Center Expansion
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan review
approval to allow the construction of
a 2,800 square foot addition to the
existing Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The hospital is located at 400 South
43rd Street and the project is located
at the northeast corner of the
hospital.
LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton
Community Development Department
Planning Division
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have
a probably significant adverse impact on the environment. An
environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead
agency. This information is available to the public upon request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
Responsible . Official: Environmental Review Committee
c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
Planning Division
Community Development Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton
Hearing Examiner no later than July 24, 1989.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact
City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about
the procedures for SEPA appeals.
PUBLICATION DATE: July 10, 198
DATE OF DECISION: July 5, 1989
SIGNATURES: I
•
Ken N�rhpr Lyn \ G tmann
Commun e o ment-Director Pub is orks Director
•
�� • ( ' S 10 6 7
•
•
•
•
. • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
•Ginny Rabago ,being first duly sworn on oath states
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the •
VALLEY DAILY NEWS ,
• Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ,
pawl. .01,I ENVIRON g,r9A:ail
• Daily newspapers published six (6) times a. week. That said newspapers 494
f � �' �i9f'il ��"
are legal newspapers' and are now and have. been for more than six E i E. AL?bElilEW t:OMMITTI months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published' �� �Ni°WASHINOTON II'
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King i(ERC)lie4leaumental Revlew:Commitl
County; Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal • Sleniticanc�.fo he follow n+nurlo eels N!
• newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ' MILFOIL;CONTROL';`QEN 'COUL(
King County. • . . . g ;APARK�(ECFtcSM-068 88) ;;�Ij.1Y a I i rllt r ,+
ppllcenb seeks�fo'.Inetell;a Etom'Here
to coat p.;I a°,pflifoh growth iln;4he,awls
• The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Dene �10 �Pa�K4 TFie p orppe�i els Iocat
, Renton Edition xx , Auburn Edition ,.(and not in In 'Qen . CjJori!Me/riorlalt'each par.supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers • 1201�FbkdlWasliirigton',Blvd:iNorth:li�;r'
during the below stated period. The annexed notice a 'VAL4EYf'rM�DICAIy�"CENTER.'t31RT
CENT6R,EX('ANSIO � �F.047}89):rkl!?
•
Appllcatlonrelte pled
Notice .of environmental determination allow,,thl3�Fotru Io �Ie �PProval I
• tlJ (Z �, q ar2r�00,squar
t� roo .ad'idon!° he:e stihb BIH 'Centeno
•
the eecond.,ti"i. ' '
waspublished on July 1 0.,'. 1 9 8 9 gf:.the Iibapital,,.The hoop
•
R5 2 6 9 tal:du bchted400 5dtjth 43rd Street'am
•
lie projectilei)oCated`at+the''o'heast col
,ner of the,hospital,i j4ril lit';'li!�!'Ill!•.i;:.' �'•
• +it Further jnfprmatlon regarding this actioi
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the De aape elee,,In.th�:rommunity D�velopmen sum of$ 2 8 , 4 3 P r�2 .Municipal Bu Iding,i Renton
Washirigtdn, 235=�550;}}fhl� beterminat(or
`la FINAL:Theretls.a 14;day appeal perloc
�` / 'which 4111.enilrtit4:60,p,m;ion'July 124,
'19B941Any appoaliof;this dec?s;gn;may,be
giici
/ i ade ;b Lthej.CiIy: ,Hearing;Examiner
•
unlcipal.hullding,. p Mill Avenue South,
•Rertto�.w hIngto a
•Flearly(riritfng;/rhygthe D terminal otn
•
Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 5 th`' day of July 19 89 ehodld'be':Weed'and mustlbe.accompa-
hied.¢y:a narrefundable$76,00111ing tee.
r 1 Publiehedthlply 19 B,;�Vim. 1QVal'ey;,Daily
rii , -
•
C.F� r.
• No Public for the State of Washington
• residing at Auburn,
King County, Washington •
• VON N87 Revised Ores
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
l •
•
•
•
•T:. ... . .._ .. _ i
2
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Environmental Review Committee
Renton, Washington
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of
Non-Significance for the following projects:
MILFOIL CONTROL, GENE COULON PARK
ECF; SM-058-89
Applicant seeks to install a bottom screen to control the milfoil
growth in the swimming areas and other shoreline areas of Gene Coulon
Park. The property is located in Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park,
1201 Lake Washington Blvd. North.
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
ECF-047-89
Application site plan review approval to allow the construction of a
2800 square foot addition to the existing Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital. The hospital is located at 400 South 43rd
Street and the project is located at the northeast corner of the
hospital.
Further information regarding this faction is available in the
Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton,
Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day
appeal period which will end at 5: 00 p.m. on July 24, 1989 . Any
appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner,
Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An
appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be
revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee.
Published: July 10, 1989
y
N OT
E
ENVIRONMENTAL
DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO.ECF-047-89, SA-047-89
APPLICANT VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
PROPOSED ACTIOgpLICATION SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO
ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2800 SQ.FT. ADDITION TO THE EXISTING
BIRTH CENTER ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE HOSPITAL.
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS
THE HOSPITAL IS LOCATED AT 400 SOUTH 43RD STREET AND THE PROJECT
IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE HOSPITAL.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
(E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
PROPOSED ACTION
DOES DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WILL WILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT O1 THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY .
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
BY 5:00 P.M., JVITM 94 , 1 9f19
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0.
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION.
CITY OF RENTON
-- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
July 6, 1989
•
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Environmental Review Section
Mail Stop PV-11
Olympia, WA 98504
Re: Environmental Determinations •
Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on July 5,1989:
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED
RENTON CROWN FILL AND GRADE PERMIT
ECF; SP-040-89
Application for approval of a fill and grade permit to allow the excavation of 64,200 cubic
yards of material (55,500 cubic yards for exporting and 8,700 cubic yards for redistributing on-
site). The property is located in the 800-850 block of Rainier Avenue North.
The fifteen (15) day comment period and the fourteen (14) day appeal period for this project
will run concurrently and will end on July 25, 1989. Following the end of the comment/appeal
period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation.
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
MILFOIL CONTROL, GENE COULON PARK
ECF; SM-058-89
Applicant seeks to install a bottom screen to control the milfoil growth in the swimming areas
and other shoreline areas of Gene Coulon Park. The property is located in Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park, 1201 Lake Washington Blvd. North.
•
Inn titlii A vnnnn Q .r.l1. - r) .., \L__t_____.__ _ __
tg?',:,''
Environmental DetermiriaLions
July 6, 1989
Page 2
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
ECF-047-89
Application for site plan review approval to allow the construction of a 2800 square foot
addition to the existing Birth Center on the second floor of the hospital. The hospital is located
at 400 South 43rd Street and the project is located at the northeast corner of the hospital.
The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than
5:00 p.m. on July 24, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination
should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee.
If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550.
Sincerely, j(
I/
•
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:mjp
cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division
Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro
Department of Wildlife
Mr. Joe Robe's, Department of Fisheries
Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation
•
1►
4% � ;Y CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division
•
July 6, 1989
Todd Olson
Mahlum & Nordfors Architects
2505 Third Avenue, Suite 219
Seattle, WA 98112
Re: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
400 South 43 Street
ECF; SA-047-89
Dear Mr. Olson:
This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review
of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee at their meeting
on July 5, 1989, issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the project.
Because there were no mitigation conditions, this Determination is final and may be appealed to
the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 24, 1989. Any appeal must state
clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-
refundable $75.00 filing fee.
Tf you have any questions, please call me or Jeanette Samek-McKague, Senior Planner and
project manager for this project, at 235-2550. .
Sincerely,
Dona c . -rickson, ATOP
Zoning Administrator
DKE:mjp
cc: Monica Brennan
Valley Medical Center
400 South 43rd Street
Renton, WA 98055
•
200 Mill Avenue South - Rentnn Wnchinatnn o2ncc _ r�n�►��c_�ccn
•
N OT ICE
.•
ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION
APPLICATION NO ECF-047-89, SA-047-89
APPLICANT VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
PROPOSED ACTIO pLICATION SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO
ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 2800 SQ.FT. ADDITION TO TILE EXISTING
BIRTH CENTER ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE HOSPITAL.
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS
THE HOSPITAL IS LOCATED AT 400 SOUTH 43RD STREET AND THE PROJECT
IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THEkHOSPITAL.
POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS
OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION.
THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
(E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE
• PROPOSED ACTION
•
DOES DOES NOT
HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
WILL WILL NOT
BE REQUIRED.
THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT 0 THIS
PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW.
COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY
AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY
BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER
• BY 5:00 P.M., .TUUT.V 94• 1 0R9
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550.
•
• DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION.
• CERTIFICATION '
•
I , MA,.,A 5av l� , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF •
THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 3• CONSPICUOUS
PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON 5 � •�� m9
_ •
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a
•
Notary Public, and for the State of Washington
residing in L 4/--n/ , on the ?,Z(.., 7
:SIGNED . 723u �I
day of 9 ( • •
/
??9,etiiirx24, ,a2-44 ,4)
��-IrvJ
City of Renton
Site Plan Review Committee
MEETING NOTICE
July 5, 1989
To: Ken Nyberg
Larry Springer
Mike Parness
Lynn Guttmann
Ron Nelson
Glen Gordon
From: Don Erickson, Secretary
Meeting Date: July 5, 1989
Time: Following the ERC Meeting
Location: Third Floor Conference Room
Agenda attached below.
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
JULY 5, 1989
Third Floor Conference Room
Following the ERC Meeting
TIME/KEY PARTICIPANTS NEW PROJECT
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, PUBLIC HOSPITAL
DISTRICT #1
SA-047-89 (Proj. Mgr. - JSM)
Application for site plan approval to allow the
construction of an addition to the existing birth center,
approximately 2800 square feet in size. The addition is
located in the N.E. corner of the hospital. The
property is located in the northeast corner of the
hospital.
•
/ r
•
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Ti.244
APPROVED !/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
S e e A/I a c,,k r Tv-a i L tti,{�2 cd ).s
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/8 8
June 26, 1989
Subject: Comments to Valley Medical Center Traffic Impact Analysis Update for
Master Site Plan
At the conclusion of the Valley Medical Center's present development, it was
determined that five items of concern should be addressed before a significant
amount of development was to continue. They are as follows:
1. Possible elimination of driveway #2 and #4.
2. Re-alignment of driveway #3 with South 177th Street.
3. Study the need for a centerlane two-way left-turn on Talbot
Road South between South 43rd Street and South 177th Street.
4. The intersection of Talbot Road South and South 43rd Street
should maintain at a service level of "E" or better through
the Valley Medical Center expansion period.
5. The intersection of SR 167 ramps and South 43rd Street
should maintain a service level of "D" or better during
Valley Medical Center expansion period.
An update of the Valley Medical Traffic Analysis has responded to these
issues. Following is our response to the updated Traffic Analysis
recommendations.
ISSUE #1: Possible elimination of driveway #2 and #4.
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
The four driveways on Talbot Road South will operate at acceptable
LOS through the year 2005. Consolidating the driveways to two loca-
tions could create level of service problems and cause a need for a
traffic signal at one of the driveways. This would be detrimental
to the traffic operations on Talbot Road and would disrupt the
internal site circulation system and would be costly.
Response:
The nearest driveway to the intersection of Talbot Road South and
South 43rd Street is well spaced back from the intersection and the
spaces between the existing driveways 1, 2, 3 and 4 are well
distanced and proportionally spaced with no apparent traffic
problems. The three-year accident records show only two recorded
accidents. We, therefore, concur with the conclusions of the study
analysis that the existing driveways should remain, with the excep-
tion of the relocation of driveway #3 which will be addressed in the
next issue.
ISSUE #2: Re-alignment of driveway #3 with South 177th Street.
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
Driveway #3 will operate at LOS A in the AM peak and LOS B in the PM
peak through the year 2005. This indicates that the re-alignment of
driveway #3 is not essential . In fact a re-alignment could
encourage short cut traffic on South 177th Street.
Response:
For the safest roadway operation on Talbot Road South and South
177th Street it is always in good engineering practice to have
driveways or intersecting roadways located opposite each other.
This helps to reduce off-set turning movement conflicts. It is our
opinion that safer roadway operations take priority over the reasons
stated in the analysis. Therefore, the re-alignment is requested to
be part of the next major building expansion which are listed as
follows:
Medical Office #2
Education and Conference Center
Chemical Dependency (40 beds)
Out-Patient Surgery
The driveway re-alignment should occur with whichever of the above-
referenced building programs occurs first.
ISSUE #3: Is a centerlane two-way left-turn on Talbot Road South between
South 43rd Street and South 177th Street needed?
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
A fifth two-way left-turn lane on Talbot Road is not required to
maintain an acceptable level of service at the four access drive-
ways. Including the tunnel in the LID project between the main and
south campuses will reduce the critical left-turn movements to the
driveways on Talbot Road by 40%.
Response:
The fifth lane is not required to maintain acceptable levels of
service but rather to provide safe access to and from the various
driveways and roadways intersecting with Talbot Road.
ISSUE #4: Valley Medical Center expansion to insure the intersection of
Talbot Road South and South 43rd Street maintains a serivce level
of "E" or better through the expansion period.
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
The intersection of Talbot Road South/South 43rd Street was
calculated to drop from a "D" to "E" in the AM and "D" to "F" in the
PM from 1995 to 2005. Background traffic volumes passing through
the area is what eventually may deteriorate the LOS service level
beyond acceptable limits by 2005.
Response:
With the expansion of Valley Medical Center through the year 1995
the services are predicted to be no lower than "D" with the tunnel
LID in place. We would consider it prudent to re-evaluate the
intersection capacity just after the year 1995 and determine what
potential improvements may increase the intersection capacity. In
reality, new by-pass routes may direct traffic away from the
intersection by 1995. Additional capacity then would not be needed.
ISSUE #5: The intersection LOS of SR-167 ramps and South 43rd Street should
be maintained at "D" or better.
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
Valley Medical 's year 2005 projected expansion analysis indicates a
service level of "E" without other cross routes built. With cross
routes developed, the intersection would operate at a service level
Response:
We do not believe the intersection needs for the year 2005 can
accurately be determined at this time. Therefore, an analysis
should be scheduled for 1995.
Additional Valley Medical Study, Recommendations:
The master site plan shows a proposed site circulation concept
drawing which would relocate the loop roadway system. It is
recommended that the loop road system be maintained on the main
campus.
Response:
While we do not have enough information with this updated study to
comment conclusively, we do believe the present loop roadway
provides for the internal needs satisfactorily.
CEM:ad
CEM120
a
.'
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ---eXIincrinfil
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 16, 1989
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89 n
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital .
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospital
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 , 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° °
2 . Air ° °
3 . Water v °
o ° °
4 . Plants °
° °
5. Animals °
° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
° ° °
7. Environmental Health °
° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° °
° °
9 . Housing °
° °
10. Aesthetics °
° ° °
11. Light & Glare °
° ° °
12 . Recreation °
° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° °
° °
14 . Transportation °
15 . Public Services ° °
° �` ° °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
\I (.1 ,c,--x;-3qc7 ,
C�. . Qr:NTON
Engic\eo mg
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are
where additional 'nformation is needed to properly assess this proposal.
/ 4-4_,---gr_
Sig ture of Director ox''Authorized Representative Dati
Rev. 6/88
.
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Bir
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
1
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNI'
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989 .
REVIEWI EPARTMENT/DIVISION:
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROV:
i
ri�i✓/v �, ��� DATE �� .. /'762
SIGNA E OF DIREC OR OR AL��PHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
N
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ,i'ict6f.c.
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 16, 1989
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 ,800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital .
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospital
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 ,800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPATT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth ° ° 0
° °
2 . Air 0 0
0
3 . Water ° °
° O O
4 . Plants °
o °
5. Animals 0 °
o . ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° °
7. Environmental Health °
O ° 0
8 . Land & Shoreline Use ! 0 0 °
o O °
9 . Housing °
O O °
10. Aesthetics °
O ° O
11. Light & Glare ° °
12 . Recreation °
o O °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° °
O O °
14 . Transportation No New 7'�c ' �re5 0
°_
15. Public Services °
o O °
16. Utilities `` ?\ °
COMMENTS: 2G v -I) aGW✓Y1 ,a v —rya.tt' I-L, 11 pa6_,-)—
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are
where add'tio 1 infgpation is needed to properly assess this proposal.
' ". 4l �
Signature of Director or 'ut�ed Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
June 26, 1989
Subject: Comments to Valley Medical Center Traffic Impact Analysis Update for
Master Site Plan
At the conclusion of the Valley Medical Center's present development, it was
determined that five items of concern should be addressed before a significant
amount of development was to continue. They are as follows:
1. Possible elimination of driveway #2 and #4.
2. Re-alignment of driveway #3 with South 177th Street.
3. Study the need for a centerlane two-way left-turn on Talbot
Road South between South 43rd Street and South 177th Street.
4. The intersection of Talbot Road South and South 43rd Street
should maintain at a service level of "E" or better through
the Valley Medical Center expansion period.
5. The intersection of SR 167 ramps and South 43rd Street
should maintain a service level of "D" or better during
Valley Medical Center expansion period.
An update of the Valley Medical Traffic Analysis has responded to these
issues. Following is our response to the updated Traffic Analysis
recommendations.
ISSUE #1: Possible elimination of driveway #2 and #4.
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
The four driveways on Talbot Road South will operate at acceptable
LOS through the year 2005. Consolidating the driveways to two loca-
tions could create level of service problems and cause a need for a
traffic signal at one of the driveways. This would be detrimental
to the traffic operations on Talbot Road and would disrupt the
internal site circulation system and would be costly.
Response:
The nearest driveway to the intersection of Talbot Road South and '
South 43rd Street is well spaced back from the intersection and the
spaces between the existing driveways 1, 2, 3 and 4 are well
distanced and proportionally spaced with no apparent traffic
problems. The three-year accident records show only two recorded
accidents. We, therefore, concur with the conclusions of the study •
analysis that the existing driveways should remain, with the excep-
tion of the relocation of driveway #3 which will be addressed in the
next issue.
•
ISSUE #2: Re-alignment of driveway #3 with South 177th Street.
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
Driveway #3 will operate at LOS A in the AM peak and LOS B in the PM
peak through the year 2005. This indicates that the re-alignment of
driveway #3 is not essential . In fact a re-alignment could
encourage short cut traffic on South 177th Street.
Response:
For the safest roadway operation on Talbot Road South and South
177th Street it is always in good engineering practice to have
driveways or intersecting, roadways located opposite each other.
This helps to reduce off-s,et turning movement conflicts. It is our
opinion that safer roadway, operations take priority over the reasons
stated in the analysis. Therefore, the re-alignment is requested to
be part of the next major building expansion which are listed as
follows:
Medical Office #2
Education and Conference Center
Chemical Dependency (40 beds)
Out-Patient Surgery
The driveway re-alignment should occur with whichever of the above-
referenced building programs occurs first.
ISSUE #3: Is a centerlane two-way left-turn on Talbot Road South between
South 43rd Street and South 177th Street needed?
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
A fifth two-way left-turn lane on Talbot Road is not required to
maintain an acceptable level of service at the four access drive-
ways. Including the tunnel in the LID project between the main and
south campuses will reduce the critical left-turn movements to the
driveways on Talbot Road by 40%.
Response:
The fifth lane is not required to maintain acceptable levels of
service but rather to provide safe access to and from the various
driveways and roadways intersecting with Talbot Road.
ISSUE #4: Valley Medical Center expansion to insure the intersection of
Talbot Road South and South 43rd Street maintains a serivce level
of "E" or better through the expansion period.
Valley Medical Study Analysis:,
The intersection of Talbot Road South/South 43rd Street was
calculated to drop from a "D" to "E" in the AM and "D" to "F" in the
PM from 1995 to 2005. Background traffic volumes passing through
4 1♦
the area is what eventually may deteriorate the LOS service level
beyond acceptable limits by 2005.
Response:
With the expansion of Valley Medical Center through the year 1995
the services are predicted to be no lower than "D" with the tunnel
LID in place. We would consider it prudent to re-evaluate the
intersection capacity just after the year 1995 and determine what
potential improvements may increase the intersection capacity. In
reality, new by-pass routes may direct traffic away from the
intersection by 1995. Additional capacity then would not be needed.
ISSUE #5: The intersection LOS of SR-167 ramps and South 43rd Street should
be maintained at "D" or better.
Valley Medical Study Analysis:
Valley Medical 's year 2005 projected expansion analysis indicates a
service level of "E" without other cross routes built. With cross
routes developed, the intersection would operate at a service level
"C."
Response:
We do not believe the intersection needs for the year 2005 can
accurately be determined at this time. Therefore, an analysis
should be scheduled for 1995.
Additional Valley Medical Study Recommendations:
The master site' plan shows a proposed site circulation concept
drawing which would relocate the loop roadway system. It is
recommended that the loop road system be maintained on the main
campus.
Response:
While we do not have enough information with this updated study to
comment conclusively, we do believe the present loop roadway
provides for the internal needs satisfactorily.
CEM:ad
CEM120
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
1
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: P2rb -ax,, t (R.,cAre: 1 cr
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 16, 1989
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the secon
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospit
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 , 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
2 . Air °
3 . Water °
4 . Plants °
5. Animals °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
°
7 . Environmental Health °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
°
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
14 . Transportation °
15 . Public Services °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS: /`-/
'V B g ,ee."4 eel 4/ <' Qls c7J /G�`e/0c( ,4 '!y
'
P' C' 4 /4-0,% .
PLANNPNG DM.41ON
CITY OF RENTON
JUN 2 1 1989
RECEIVE®
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those area:
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or a:
where 'tio information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
/4 l9.k,
Si t re o irector or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/M
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /644 7e- ieecf /•per
/( APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
4/c ( f`c,d'./ re/a/ocL ,0/1 c r" Irk G.40'41U-?4-174,\_.
,2fl'/v
o�--� DATE ,e/e1,12 / /yj2p
SIGNA E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: " 1j
19
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 16, 1989
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospital
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 , 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
2 . Air
3 . Water °
4 . Plants °
5 . Animals °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
7 . Environmental Health °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
°
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
14 . Transportation °
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
0 KE60YY\M 8M0 CJ
ZDc .s HOSpr14L PPitl)Sloik) N\-)a
RRtokn) Fotz Ti) 1ospimt,
(10r Noorlior)e+G T N\P IC. 1"11it! GtorliOu ) s 2 Q' 0
I �
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature Director or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
r r
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
X SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 6G1 R?& PLI )F\)I/'JçIJ
APPROVED ��APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
C) 40, PAR Kiiv(0 .CaC`►Rji enY03 wou/ K.16(3 Yo
'y1 ti1 C3P` l 14osp 1PLJ PAIJ51 a st.J
.aft -T: weibt,
DATE c
SIGNATURE OF D R CTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �'
REV. 6/88
,
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET CflYOFRENT°N
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: :›Itc,C. JUN 1 21989
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 16, 19 CEIVED
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospital
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction _
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2, 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° °
2 . Air °
°
3 . Water ° °
o ° °
4 . Plants ° °
o ° °
5. Animals °
°
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
7 . Environmental Health °
° ° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
° °
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
° 0 °
11. Light & Glare °
° ° °
12 . Recreation °
° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° ° °
14 . Transportation °
° ° °
15. Public Services °
° ° °
16. Utilities „/' °
COMMENTS:
6 CVO Q,C:10,A&
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are
where itional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
Signature of`Dlrectb± or Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2,800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED. ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION ,
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
✓APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
1 C) Pith/WV'
'U)/ L DATE L4109
SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
r/// ' ' - '''
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: StOYVY-1 it ,—
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 16, 1920
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89 J0� Nop,_
04,
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center N
. c
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expa . k.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2, 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospital
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 , 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
° ° °
2 . Air ° / ° °
° °
3 . Water ° °
°
4 . Plants ° ° 0.
°
5. Animals ° °
°
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
°
7. Environmental Health °
°
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
°
9 . Housing ° °
°
10. Aesthetics °
°
11. Light & Glare °
°
12 . Recreation °
°
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
°
14 . Transportation °
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
See `"eh� ie-yc
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal .
lerl
Signature of Director ora Authorized Representative ,�.
p Dade
Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
r i
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS: ,Murn
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
v/ APPROVED
APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
1141"/
p�titi -, 1c fc/.�d de, ��, e,,/6-1
cods /ric,4 y,
Jzt.r7ii
n DATE 6 6 19
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE //
REV. 6/88
I '
1 ,,
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Bi:
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 198!
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
•
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
P1ANMIC DR/5f ,`1
POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF h;NiON
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ñ JUN 8 1989
BUILDING DIVISION ( ) I " S�
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUN:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (Jr/4,7V ,O/J,4,i/.E4 '€1NN-
APPROVED ►C APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROI
[UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT I; � * IF. ,UILDIhb IS OVER 30 Ef HI•GN,
LATE COMERS AGREE�YiE63'� t.:= l �-���t;(p ,,T :- ®- A "Mac FLOW 'PREvEHT'ot% vEvic6. t (Dl
LATE COMERS ABREERIE T-E. .s s__•• -a it /VD MOT S E i i Au.E 0 Al M ET E R. i F erwe
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C •V:::273 No • I The is reo-r o t . ACRE AO V i a s
SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT C :::: C :ER. AB ` fit,.. .J
SPECIAL ASSESSIzEE`3T I:;:E.'1 F;: -TEEN No
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT 0 :.-SLt:L A
APPROVED WATER PLAN NO BACK FLOW PREVENTION
APPROVED SEWER PLAN NO DEVICE(S) REQUIRED.
1 SUBMIT CERTIFIED TEST
APPROVED FIRE HYDRAIL LL�,..L.::'i
BY FIRE DEFT. N6 RESULTS FOR EACH DEVICE
PRIOR TO AFCUPA•NCY: 6C�
i�
!E2"FLL:"J ANALYSIS W6 D
"�° 4/�— DATE l 7- — �'9
SIGNAT RE OF DIRE 0 OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
4 el - /bof
ai- Lc_ 7-89
CtataAt.
• kfaL £, - /6,- c?9
r '
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (14-i I( cam
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 164,) 989
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89
Ci (G; i:.:;'u;t;
g JUN 8 ij-�
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center 1989
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center ApCnii4nw E ti
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the sect
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hosp:
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 , 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° °
2 . Air °
°
3 . Water °
o ° °
4 . Plants °
o ° °
5. Animals °
o °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
°
7 . Environmental Health °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° °
°
9 . Housing °
°
10. Aesthetics °
°
11. Light & Glare ° °
°
12 . Recreation °
_ °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° °
°
14 . Transportation °
°
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities ° I/ °
COMMENTS:
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those ar
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
where additional in ormation i eeded to properly assess this proposal.
dd./ 1,4i 6 g
Signature of Director or Au orized Representative Date
Rev. 6,
Ij
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PikvA"11U1r U/V/C,,.,.
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 1989 COMMENTS DUEnun 961 89 r0/r
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89 IF ly a 1989 ,
Ccpvg
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the secon
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospit
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 , 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION ,
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
o ° °
2 . Air °
3 . Water °
o ° °
4 . Plants °
° °
5. Animals °
° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
° °
7 . Environmental Health °
° ° °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use °
° ° °
9 . Housing °
° ° °
10. Aesthetics °
° ° °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
° ° °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
o ° °
14 . Transportation °
o °
15. Public Services °
o ° °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS: p C,, .—
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those are
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or
Cwhere ditiona information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
,-.E
114---' -- —
Signature of Director o Authorized Representative Date
Rev. 6/
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHE ,
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89 ® UN
J '0FN (,0
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center 2989
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center ExpasinfiQ
v E
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center. on the second floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989 .
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
APPROVED , APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
DATE
SIGNATURE OF DIREC R OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/8
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: JLj\c
DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: June 16, Itik2.19 41.,
N
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89 '®� ?9
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center '®
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospital
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA (gross) : 2 , 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
2 . Air °
3 . Water °
4 . Plants °
5. Animals °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
7. Environmental Health °
8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° °
9 . Housing °
10. Aesthetics °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
14 . Transportation °
15. Public Services °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are
where additi a informat ' o is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,
Signatu o. Director or Authorized Representative Date
�/ Rev. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2 , 800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center on the second floor of the, hospital.
r, o
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
0
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
6
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OP THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: BCDG
APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
�� C. ��c�✓�o�_ DATE �o S—J
SIGNATU 'OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT s s; AOMENTLT b
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST R S E
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 9-trc.. 41 - -' Q4144444
NI 1 DATE CIRCULATED: June 2 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: J 16 1 M04,
r,.,� • 3' C ` ?199
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-047-89 � 8
�e�
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center �®
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2, 800 square foot addition to the Birth Center on the second
floor of the hospital.
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in the N.E. corner of the hospital
SITE AREA 5, 500 square feet impacted by construction
BUILDING AREA . (gross) : 2, 800 square feet
IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE
MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION
IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY
1. Earth °
° °
2 . Air °
o ° °
3 . Water °
°
4 . Plants °
° °
5. Animals °
. ° °
6. Energy & Natural Resources °
o ° °
7. Environmental Health °
° °
8. Land & Shoreline Use °
o ° °
9 . Housing °
. ° °
10. Aesthetics °
° °
11. Light & Glare °
12 . Recreation °
o °
13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation °
° °
14 . Transportation °
. ✓ °
15. Public Services °
° °
16. Utilities °
COMMENTS:
We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas
which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are
where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal.
L,-, -, /9/7
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative to
\ Rev. 6/88
1
.
v
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET
ECF-047-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-047-89
PROPONENT: Valley Medical Center
PROJECT TITLE: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant proposes to construct an
approximately 2,800 square foot addition to the Valley Medical Center Birth
Center on the second floor of the hospital.
r,
LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43 Street) ,
infilling under an existing patient wing in N.E. corner of hospital.
TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: June 28, 1989
ENGINEERING DIVISION
TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:
UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
PLANNING DIVISION
SHORT RANGE
LONG RANGE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OTHERS:
COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN
WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON June 16, 1989.
REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:
✓ AAPPPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED
Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi-
nances.
A second means of approved access is required. Fire Department ass roads/lanes shall be paved
minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes_s_—_— No
Preliminary fire fl calculations show a fire flow of r*--(70 is
required. /2 hydrants with a minimum flow of
is required. 7 `� gpm each
Primary hydrant is required to be within . f / feet of the structure.
Secondary hydrants are required to be within 77/) feet of the
structure.
An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes ,No._..
All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction.. Ye - No—
All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes , No_
DATE /9
SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
REV. 6/88
MAHLUM & NORDFO BXTUF 3 OF U ARSE CIU'Unli
Architecture, Facility Planning;.,,..priors
2505 Third Avenue Suite 219
Seattle, Washington 98121
DATE JOB NO.
6/8/89 88014. 10
(206) 441-4151 ATTENTION
DONALD ERICKSON, AICP
RE:
TO CITY OF RENTON VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
400 SOUTH 43RD STREET
200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH, RENTON WA 98055
ECF; SA-047-89
WE ARE SENDING YOU E Attached ❑ Under separate cover via COURIER the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
10 6/7/89 REVISED SITE PLAN, SHEET A-1
1 6/7/89 PMT OF REVISED SITE PLAN, SHEET A-1
GI`iYOFfENrQA
JUN $ i.w
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: C7
_ a
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
E For your use 0 Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
la As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS DEAR MR. ERICKSON:
WE ARE SUBMITTING UPDATED SITE PLAN AS REQUESTED IN YOUR LETTER OF JUNE 2, 1989.
PLEASE REPLACE THE SITE PLAN A-1 DATED 6/8/87 IN THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL WITH THE
ATTACHED SITE PLAN A-1 DATED 6/7/89.
THANK YOU
TODD OLSON
COPY TO OME ALMEDA, VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
SIGNED:
PRODUCT240-3 [nres/Inc Groton,Mass.01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us t once.
'•,FROM: " SHIPPER NAME TO: .! 4 _CONSIGNEE NAME i CONT.ROLNUMSBR
-" - - • , " . .•-"- ,. . :'', :...: , ; , t.. .., t., •..._.•• . ,,
ADDRESS ; ADDRESS DATE
. .. .. .
i.-
;
DRIVER1 DRIVER 2
,, Y )i• : •C :
art ZIP ZONE CITY , ZIP ., -- , ZONE CUSTOMER NUMBER
1.. I
i CHARGE TO: SHIPPING CHARGE SERVICE TYPE CODE CHARGES
MIT::HI-.t....(4. f--.:: 0 F.,!]-.3 ;.-.•.ii--7 ri r;:t.r.3 PPD COLL DESCRIPTION OF GOODS(SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/INFORMATION/DRIVER PAYOUT/ETC.) PIECES WEIGHT
. t) GUST.REF,.'1(7.,1 ,. d/
i 7 y Y '''
''' i e'' ''--1--)/ fYI -.;' ':'.: '.;IY'i-:-. ::- '', ;') ,‘-;l'r• t'..' '
' t ,. , ' I ' ' / 1;.1,• -—-'i .'J t:-•I 1--.......,
_COST...REF.2/ ,,.,/ ,...: /
'
; - i ./ ; /:" •-
i., A-•-1,,,,://,'"..,
DECLARED VALUE C 0.D AMOUNT 1 CHARGES WAIT TIME WAIT TIME OUST.REF.3
is' I
PPS. COLL
E. SHIPPER PICK-UP DRIVER P.U. ,/.U.DATE DEL RECEIVED I RECEIVED IN GOOD ORDER i TOTAL CHARGES
1,4 (1, i L.. , i
., I i 'I;.p 1
I il ", , TIME DEL.TIME I
1 .// ' ':. .'
, •' / .--",.
/
' -I;.,,- .:•, /
ENAri7:L..J.,.;-?.-..:
COURIERS . 0 1 0 0 6
,..
, .1 DELIVERY RECEIPT
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
•
1. The carrier shall be liable only for loss, damage or injury to the goods carried and then only to the extent
of the value of those goods,which value the customer agrees shall not exceed$2.00 per pound for all goods
carried under this bill of lading, unless a higher value is declared in writing by the customer.
2. No liability for such loss,damage or injury shall exist unless the customer gives notice in writing to the carrier
within 9 months of such event.
0
' U
3. All shipments received are subject to local tariffs, terms and conditions with respect to rates and payment w
either as imposed by law and regulation and all delivery charges must be paid in accordance therewith.
CITY OF RENTON
.IL .
IMmo ":}" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor
June 2, 1989
rf •
Todd Olson
Mahlum & Nordfors Architects
2505 Third Avenue, Suite 219
Seattle, WA 98112
Re: Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion
400 South 43 Street
ECF; SA-047-89
Dear Mr. Olson:
The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced
application.
Please be advised that we require up-to-date site plans for the review of this application.
The plans you submitted with the application date back to 1987 and no longer are accurate.
The new plans must be submitted by June 9, 1989.
The application has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for
review by the Technical Advisory Committee on June 28, 1989.
If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Jeanette
Samek-McKague of our office at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
DKE/MBS:mjp
cc: Monica Brennan
Valley Medical Center
400 South 43rd Street
Renton, WA 98055
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
•
NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the
Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application
and the necessary Public Approvals.
DESCRIPTION: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
ECF; SA-047-89
Applicant proposes to construct an approximately 2,800 sq. ft. addition to the Valley
Medical Center Birth Center on the second floor of the hospital.
GENERAL LOCATION: Second floor of Valley Medical Center (400 South 43rd
Street), infilling under an existing patient wing in the northeast corner of the hospital.
PUBLIC APPROVALS:
o Environmental Review
o Site Plan Approval
o Building Permit
The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of
Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during
Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further
information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the
Planning Division at 235-2550.
:----vs,--.:..- -
_ s
' 'A.. IS AY*. N3IWAS±—•I • iL,�', • 4 2T, 1�l \f' .I .
6
f Ar t' ✓&Ord .1rouiwk+ eA, .... +�� M v �V�
i• irtrru IS w ru A'.,,sir ssf j��Ar Cn4r '\ I S
,4f A 3Hv1 `/ ® I� \ •
I -
JUA2lj ` I M
41,
I •
I MfA►1 'A3lTr,A l r —. — l
-- 3�, VALLEY tkAge..ICf L CE, TO I .I�-
qb
A I ` AV
S r 0 F'•I pf O I 3 S a I �► I ''�7
51\ 1 —-d�B.AvY----Z ` I- 3 V)1.--.-•-.-_•I—.-•-•_----• f—I----
I
fu . s AV uf1L I W
' ilift\\..•• I i
'1r tN% 1` RD• S �}- b,
� AV prgt
,,.."<,,A.e.,,-- ,03;r001 .
`ti 0PA,I�``• Ig .1 I f�z ia�'
I
�.s AV lun 4iin 'rib tl3AQSMr ■ S/rN Y trier -
•Alg sm:" ' i qiiD.:: ;;:::;::1:i tv4; ' rri`NN
lid -.....„,...._ iiri u„,
Isn ...wow..
—..—
r •
-0...A" !A p` { r"�' ., ,/.
...� f AV:' ii,,
_--_' ..Z1- —1 r f ^w I. ../! P+�.. F S ,Ae...e
1
-„ P_ bI 11 g
IV—' 1141.417---- --it ••1.0 ..---------.) iiitg!1 'oilli 1 h 8 1 i
42 s',114:. i ' 7.:Titz-zattiox, _.:.. .. 4,7:L. 1.0. ::,...110)Hvi!igl ,
cc 1.#0 r ! .1.Al tire - 7.1 .1.Pir-..al.*A._.. _i 'L'.'7.'._, b
. .., .. • . .n,„ wit__''' / /, ,"+•ic y
Tb,
tli
lk
zz zz zzzzzzzzz `�® .+i ( �`�� �t Y _ \\ • • //ii.414%-•••., \ /anaeeF» x)-p / 911110111,14
I e./ �. J� r _ h.�. a' ili� �. .
.,•sa eAe8��aRtip. 9 / �Ii `il,.l 3. ° �—d ��ffi1-�3 a�63 ' '�A � ���� • Vag;
� r�� � /��'.fr � \��. . -..s ate. Y�_ba�a ,,, WI.� I•'.' .
�VYzz73 pillc4 �"'Crlf �4e w/ I r r F.- /• c:ekt _ �• p _ p
W
gk ��tlig� Air L =z'C �� 1� �I',` ••p tzat ` , /® •
.. o. -moo
2Z42224 aa71 �� .�W►�!/� ,� _ -.� '�ii ••< )O. "•
<OJDWLd2-'Idir IIaW_ ♦ 4,4�Il ! ks •' c(6)LETe _� ` \ 11
I py�I � to,
sv c J_6116 EA YN .1�'• O 1 l I N1 8 E
•
/A� i J� lun u.J neT 1 y9J
9 J I r�SSI//� a,_ C'i�+�( < A't (s),I I w p it
•• J F
y a.` N 7, fI`-.r_.e.. 1 �j 6foC(F)<i+eT!� • sEJ•u•c' �'p �•/ -- :e� / /, I V 0 0 / {y.�y��1 9 A�/� .�� -- (q®r_ �_ rR.cG�.e •. _ y. ,II' y
A / '��\ NVY Cct w m r'r<'i.3�.�1"�',r''i"�N di �",. '41 +�, 7. ..s y;—" ,>
' / 4, \\\/ I )' caw�J w.•}• \ _ `` - ` _{.
ttz .. /'k / --+A�� /. //�\ Itett
�#___. t .,..„,,,,„, _j�))hj' 1 �•,^ (F)mnbKccslw. el,��N N w,rl:.
/ ..��• /IAA ` /I// 0 5 ` `a ,......pi/ ,1(.44:• 'C'`t: x 8i p I� I
4,2r.f . ., . ..,..- mix,r-_ Ag-- ,,. . . - / *-7 RIgl.)•..:.i .,--,-- :g/ — I*, i• „,
•
4- 4.?; ,4: "I '11.,ii, ,.,??., \\ i.14„ .., *. .1 lz" . 7.:i. , %T.•,Z7'1 ,..;.:.'.Z7,, iz ..‘'. ,. :*7, ,. 211:1\'''. .
'Ir
u LL 1 'o.r r ��`` e-roe,```i)s sT /d i 'M• c.i..„,.:.,7;i:1:•,l-
1.7''.1"'r ",....-ti-..1 id:ii.r,
-)7,-.-,.,-7.,:.
,1..A-4r4-1,..1?. •-•..;2.*•.:-t 7.-4..1.1,,d e
-- -,,,.4,...'
/ '- / T •/ _ <4 \q, 4 ,/1 •, • «. •••� ` ` * ((CJJJ /— SITE giPLANP IEN
. 1:1 1 ,>/,—v-----i ili\,"1/4i0i.',, ./ ., 4,..'„-„....tzsg,•4,Ar,„1144P
• . •
f ' --/---if:"4, tab,. A , ' 1 tr-t, ••• '11-i * .A,- __- _ :.7'.;Y•'
♦ b- Di.. ood.e
D WG(•1)T<tYf
•II , 9 9 y C •_ O\� \ p sw ssw u awc(N),47
II I -.. �� `w - -• Rirn.F�-TL4
vJ SFJ w>' `�•I .w:.. / - n'NC s)`�lTc 1WA11.M.1
D-A•c N)'1141
w„�.<,,, s �s„�J ` BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
•rcawcct.),76 --•sF.l.�•a- ti•,F� SITE PLAN s.r
(N)ITb WNa•.L OL D•r^"CS)>•7.SI SW ff].I POI:, may, I�Gd'-d A�il a-wc(p)rt4z • nco.+c<s)zca4 e.l�Y(AB nw rcolc Cs)s,rt
e-a..CJ)..e i4YlLD Iz•aa<c(N)sT,s JZF_.Cp({p �� .
OF R4.
% ( NoTicE
�
o O .
I V o Q 2
.1
i ppq �
40, SEPTEt
OF PENDING
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
D E S C R I P II VALL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 2,800 SQ.FT.
ADDITION TO THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER BIRTH CENTER ON THE SECOND
FLOOR OF THE HOSPITAL.
•
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
•
SECOND FLOOR OF VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (400 SOUTH 43RD STREET) ,
INFILLING UNDER AN EXISTING PATIENT WING IN N.E. CORNER OF
HOSPITAL.
PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED :
o Environmental Review
o Site Plan Approval
o Building Permit Approval
•
PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED
BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS
• AND DURING PUBLLC
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL. THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
-- - - - --- C E R T-I F.I C A T I 0 N
' =-� �a HEREBY CERTIFY THAT
3 COPIES OF
TIE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN
CONSPICUOUS ��
LACES ON OR NEARBY TIE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ONV.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, e •
Notary Public, in end for the State of Washington
IY'.
residing in �E/u7Q�cJ
on the GGQ day of I61q —
a: .
ti
•
OF R� .
Ci Q z
TM T I cE
..,‘
0
94•co SEple•
OF PENDING
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
DESCRIPTION :
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
APPLICANT PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 2 , 800 SQ. FT.
ADDITION TO THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER BIRTH CENTER ON THE SECOND
FLOOR OF THE HOSPITAL.
GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS:
SECOND FLOOR OF VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (400 SOUTH 43RD STREET) ,
INFILLING UNDER AN EXISTING PATIENT WING IN N.E. CORNER OF
HOSPITAL.
PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED :
o Environmental Review
o Site Plan Approval
o Building Permit Approval
PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED
BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS
AND DURING • PUBLLC F' M INGS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL . THE CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550
THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE -REMOVED
WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION
MAHLUM & NORDFO LIEUU[ 07 1TQQ06 [1TfQEL
Architecture, Facility Planning, inieriors
2505 Third Avenue Suite 219
Seattle, Washington 98121 OAT - 25 ^sici JOB g80 1
4 D
(206) 441-4151 AT E TION
RE:
TO G l'CY o l= .Itre,t,/1
Vw1-71140 aNIt& P . -rl -r \A-+.t- jk." ` t Ce5krr -
MUIJ1GLPjeslr FA - laIF�TIk l_.�.1 - Np,fJSoo
2cPp 1,41 LA—- A)U LA£ v T"l 1 .kT FL-p J g_47/1 Al
R �°,-) ) tyk1,6, k4-1 J6-pr) el ga 5-5
WE ARE SENDING YOU I 'Attached ❑ Under separate cover via G'04,R4r - the following items:
—
❑ Shop drawings 0 Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 s w.qV1e-el? 1,i-r-rP'Lr -145.4-3
1 , (1.< siD - 4 —' ,/ 9, —
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval 0 Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit_ copies for approval
KFor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
- Ig As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS �O Wl p er'
pippin DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
G MAY 2 6 1989 ,!,
i,
1 c U --r 6rJ s
COPY TO —� 11
SIGNED:PRODUCT24U3 (A e JIxGroton,nus 01471. If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us atjo
ce.
<,l�Y O ~ITY OF R ��g.,��.,r
t FILE NO(S): SA-D47'�1
E : UILDING & ZONING DEPARTMtNT 6+ 7�� 7
ru
CMASTER APPLICATION
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those
items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed.
(Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION
NAME FEES
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER .
❑ REZONE*(FROM ' TO )
ADDRESS •
400 SOUTH 43RD STREET • ❑ SPECIAL PERMIT*
CITY ZIP TRY PERMIT*
RENTON, WA 98055 ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT*
TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL 800.00
❑ SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL
251-5141 No. of Cubic Yards:
CONTACT PERSON ' ❑ . VARIANCE*
From Section: •
* Justification Required
NAME ' TODD OLSON • I
MAHLUM & NORDFORS ARCHITECTS •
ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: .
2505 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 219
❑ SHORT PLAT
CITY ZIP ❑. TENTATIVE PLAT
SEATTLE, WA 98112 CD PRELIMINARY PLAT
TELEPHONE
FINAL PLAT
•
441-4151 [] WAIVER
(Justification Required)
OWNER NO. OF LOTS:
NAME - PLAT NAME:
VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER q
ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:
400 SOUTH 43RD STREET
❑ PRELIMINARY
CITY ZIP
•
❑ FINAL
RENTON, WA 98055 •
P.U.D. NAME:
TELEPHONE •
. 251-5141 ❑ Residential ❑ Industrial
❑ Commercial ❑ Mixed
LOCATION
MOBILE HOME PARKS:
PROPERTY ADDRESS ❑
400 SOUTH 43RD STREET TENTATIVE
EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY
HOSPITAL FINAL
P-1 -
PROPOSED USE, PARK NAME:
NO CHANGE . • . -
NUMBER OF SPACES: �. - =
0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE- �'`. 100.00 '
SQ. FT. ACRES — _ . __ --
AREA: . 32 TOTAL FEES 900.00
STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
DATE STAMP - p �_
`�.�i y, APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: `M ��`e-�
��) 'S APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
i'R MAY 2 4 1989 h ® Accepted
�' ��,� n �� ( ❑ Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
, -, L ,, ., Kuu # /31 (Initials)
DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY:
APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE:
❑ Accepted
❑ Incomplete Notification Sent On By:
• (Initials)
ROUTED TO:
❑ Building ❑ Design Eng. ❑ Fire ❑ Parks
El
Police ❑ Policy Bev. ❑ Traffic Eng. ❑ Utilities
•
Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet).
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
AFFIDAVIT
/I U.44(4,4 ,41 a4 , being duly sworn, declare that I am
En authorized representative to act for the property owner,®owner of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the
information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
29 DAY . OF /rla).
19,1_
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT
•
(Name ir:f Notary Public) Signature of Owner)
/Y?J V st 26 3 '.,,1 4 co. y
Vid
(Address) /U—/% 92 (Address)
filf)tni ,16,T
(City) �(Sta.te) (Zip),
a o 6 e2f1-5-7 9/
(Telephone)
Accept nce of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete
applic ion. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in
the " pplication Procedure."
Foam #174
4 Y
•
OWNER: Valley Medical Center
ADDRESS: 400 South 43rd Street
Renton, Washington 98055
KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER:
(312) 305-9002
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that, portion of the North 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section
31, Township 23 North, Range ' 5 East, W.M. lying northerly of the
northerly margin of South 180th Street; westerly of the westerly
margin of Springbrook Road (Talbot Hill Road) (96th Avenue South);
easterly of Primary State Highway No. 5 (East Valley Freeway).
Located on South 180th Street between Valley Freeway on the west
and 96th Avenue South on the East.
8570.01 C001.GL
•
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RDNTpN
MAY
2 4 1989
•
l(t
. ,
'"' gleoll — '—' -. • '--.-"" E I: *IG,.
. .
--- -- ' ' / I
-..,- • --t,.-74----,tr-- -12 31112-6:::2= -IL d, ti- ———-4.-- ?- -1,-..r7 --I--t-•
---:-:-.-ig.: -
,,,, seamB1 .•::I E. tam.''S AV .1.i.s862..:'4"
•-•
S At •
1
E .., .o.
-liiiessammo 0
. ..ro.u.,. HIEC 86<,•••,t-At'46..4'4' I
17,• i:.-:, ---,-7 • — I L
li_v_Ar,
N
1- - - ° • 1 0.-i,..
__---
IMF: -0,..11:
IS.. ' 0 °I
4
<
--11,--
st " . - '1v1
1
-..._
VALLry
zo .. 1 A/48J 0 I"
Awl . pallYA 3 IF ' I - -
WC C CF, TkR :-..
AV
I A
r. - I..
—---•11-- 3 2116 I
u,Timm.
....
•-,r
r v 1
1
,_ , 3 •if kli _ 1
z
w - 1
I 1
6 ::‘• - . ..,..4-..-;:,.,,t 1 • I .
F-- -4. ._.1 c ,, ...)-' to .
I., co , ,_-.:1.1
cz
-1-
- I 1,
1 . I, IIIIKUAN
rAt5,59„A."-'1111;019gl'-'f:Th :
S AV:mar-
3•
I rr)
ani.Z.h. r, i
- ,
s
s A. oriv“
agm'' ,..1.1.!,0,--..
a
0,!t•:,-,,,-..3.4.;,-,..,---- 4,,-.-,:,,
...o.-• .4;9•til •',.:
. .tst
,.
___
glIF 1410i .
-1.-.. ,... \
. 06
'... --...I. ._1110 W. _
•-EV-
74 a,
, !all ._ 1! .7), ....,t..............„
S AV N1)1 a Wu $ SIAM" a 0
tAissin onii!
• F-4 11;ar.:..
,As,— i 1 1:s).:: .—":".i
a KA&
out.G
- ;
' ' id ilb ilim..-_. WI uld
'--I
"121/111111111111 ..--.. W
N
0 0 , -------rfr-- "g• . urA ,
0 r-4 ts 1
:.,....
I '
1 !
uprixanos
.., ..-
"
IIPV0i.j. tlg 4.'2 ism ' .. '
i • ._. 4r.,1
NORTH VICINITY_
12n p- o- •- 11 i
s .. ..._. 1
s i
,
"rer 111410
...i :it .11:-.A.,,,,11..........
••••I'''1 il F. !• ,,:••." 4 V15/I. .
s N le WC r• it - ,....11,• :,-.
- i.-' I t.!--•-v.r-11'4- s t..-AV...e.
VICINITY MAP
pLANNii,, .
ciiy,,,„
e CiV
i 11 .
MAY 2- 4 /989 ' ,
r 1 ,
;t'I
. -
•
:_
Valley Medical Center
Birth Center Expansion
Project Narrative, Site Plan Review
May 19, 1989
The Valley Medical Center Birth Center Expansion is an infill of approximately 2800 sf on the
hospital's second floor, adjacent to the existing Birth Center. The project will not alter the
overall building footprint as the new exterior walls will align with the existing third floor
patient wing above. The elevations will continue the wall and glazing pattern of the existing
hospital. Sitework will be limited to the repair of existing planting beds disturbed during the
construction process.
/
PLANNING Di's,;�,t1a,
CITY OF RE 1�QE
R MAY 2 4 1989 r?'
JCL 11 �9/ iC j'•
i
`CERTIFICATION OF I....IFICATION OF ADJACENT PROFC"TY OWNERS/SITE PLAN
M r "FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY" M M
PROJECT TITLE: f711?-114 %est-j
APPLICANT: Valley Medical Center
APPLICATION NUMBER: SA- 047_59
The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the
pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City
Code. Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to
site plan approval.
ASSESSOR'S
NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons 17930 Talbot Rd. S. 312305-9135
Renton, Wa. 98055
Renton Valley 79 Associates 17900 Talbot Rd. S. 312305-9134
Renton, Wa. 98055
Valley Eye Clinic 17824 Springbrook Rd.S. 761680-0010
David P. Wellington Renton, Wa. .98055
Pacific Medical Clinic 17800 Talbot Rd. S. 761680-0030
The Dr. Place Renton, Wa. 98055
Glen A. Patchen %Executive House Inc. 761680-0050
Springbrook Medical Center 7517. Greenwood Ave. N.
(17722 Springbrook Rd. S.) Seattle, Wa. 98103
Valley Urology (17620 Springbrook) 3764 S.W. 171st 761680-0290,
Lyn R. Frary Seattle, Wa. 98166
Springbrook Professional Park 17600 Talbot Rd. S. 3123054026'
Man F. Wilson Renton, Wa. 98055
Orthodontics (3901 Talbot Rd.S.) 5454 Lake. Washington B1vd.S.E. 312305-9065
W.E. Brain Bellevue, Wa. 98006
Chin Hills ' 3915 Talbot Rd. S. 312305-9101
Dr. San Lwai Renton, Wa. 98055
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
12_1&`f D MA 2 4 1989
• E
11 1.11
I /
•
CITY OF RENTON
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION
May 16, 1989
Eric Thoman
General Council
Valley Medical Center
400 South 43rd Street
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Birth Center Project
Dear Eric,
This is a follow-up to your letter of May 2, 1989 and Ken
Nyberg and my visit with you, Omie, John and Rich Roodman on
May 4, 1989 .
I believe that the issue of "missed or unreturned phone
calls" was cleared up. John Scott noted that I had called
you back on April 28, 1989 and asked that you he let you
know. We also discussed the fact that Jeanette had told me
that she spoken with you and said that she had told me that
she was addressing you concerns.
Regarding the issue of the "footprint" of the Birth Center
and whether it needs to go through SEPA and Site Plan Review
we discussed DOE's recent guidelines that recommend that all
project actions consider SEPA. Also, the Court of Appeals in
a decision on a Seattle case in 1980 (Downtown Traffic Plan-
ning Committee v. Royer) held that agencies should consider
likely environmental effects before applying the SEPA
categorical exemptions. I also noted that even when an
addition is less than the specified exemption level (4, 000
sq. ft. in this case) if the total building including the
addition is over 4, 000 sq. ft. SEPA requires the filing of
an environmental checklist and the issuance of a threshold
determination by the lead agency.
Also, as I had noted in an earlier administrative
determination nearly a year ago regarding the expansion of
the center's existing footprint to accommodate Mac Donalds,
such an expansion would require, as a minimum, admini-
strative Site Plan Review. Since we must look at the
addition in conjunction with the structure to which it is
being added, we cannot legally exempt the Birth Center from
either SEPA or Site Plan Review.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550
f .
Regarding the issue of a Master Plan I believe there is some
confusion on your part. At our meeting on April 17 , 1989 at
which we discussed parking needs on the VMC campus I
mentioned that it would expedite the City's ability to
review projects under SEPA if we had a generic EIS for all
proposed expansions over, say, a five to ten year period. At
that meeting I suggested that it might be advisable to
"flush" or "fill out" in more detail the somewhat brief
Master Plan of November, 1987 prior to undertaking a generic
type EIS on it.
Since the Master Plan dated November 2,1989 does not contain
either pages 13a or 27a that you referenced, we cannot
determine whether the supplemental information you reference
does address in detail the proposed birth center and when it
was intended to come on line. We are checking our files now
for any record of having received these materials which you
suggest were submitted to us on February 5, 1989. Presumably
this information is relevant to the current Birth Center
application and should be made a part of that file. Please
provide us with another copy of these materials so that they
can be made a part of File Number ECF, SA-047-89.
In your last paragraph of your letter you suggest that "the
City is choosing to use its valuable resources unnecessarily
in over-scrutinizing a project. " We do not concur with this
assessment. The Department of Community Development prides
itself in ensuring that all applicants are treated equitably
and fairly. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, PACCAR
Kenworth, Henderson Homes, Centron, E & H Properties, et al
can attest to the fact that City staff are very consistent
in requiring the same types of mitigation or development
revisions for similar types of projects. As you know, we
are mandated by state law, to review all projects over 4, 000
sq. ft. for environmental impacts. Clearly, the existing
medical center exceeds this area by having an estimated
gross floor area of over 400, 000 square feet.
Ken and I enjoyed our opportunity to meet with you and the
other administrative staff. We will do whatever we can to
expedite this project within legal parameters. Hopefully, as
you develop your master plan in more detail and begin
looking at implementation scheduling well in advance of
project application, these last minute crisis can be
avoided. This would make things work better for both of us.
w
If I can answer any questions or be of further assistance •
please let me or Jeanette Samek-Mckague, the project planner
for the Birth Center know.
- .,/j/_. .
Donal• K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
•
•
i
1
nzallayn, nn. 7OU77
TO: CJ iargrr-
Fuvotot1/4.36/-zot., .-K r ADIMI�)1� 1 Date WAr 4,4439
Project No.
ATTENTION: T© 2tG4 O4 Budget No.
SUBJECT: wm2,114 k 1C I O t4
vt opP`t.. a c, c, LLis rs
• The following items are being sent: (i ‹) Herewith ( ) Preliminary
( ) Under Separate Cover ( ) Final
Estimated Amount $
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION
---�-- 1 1 'a 4L(sr
c!tc L sT
These items are being sent: e<
(>4o. For action CITY OF RENTON
( s
) For For yourou tgeneral o sinformation and file MAY 9 1989
( ) For your approval and correction J C OWE
( ) Approved
( ) Not approved, resubmit
( ) Approved as noted
( ) Building Permit applied for
REMARKS: ;
WE Afpizecor ,&L y 2 ksCts sec,- .
oiu 7Z�a ►� eci s
Very truly yours,
PLANT ENGINEERING
By: (NALgi
. ,r
JF
•.444, 'ECF: If947-81
• t% `Q z City of Renton
o
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
TED SECAcoo'
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
' observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land.' Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects: The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),
the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
BIRTH CENTER EXPANSION
2. Name of applicant: VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person:
Monica Brennan
400 South 43rd Street •
Renton, WA 98055
228-3450
4. Date checklist prepared: MAY 1989
S. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
START CONSTRUCTION: MAY 1989
COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION: NOVEMBER 1989 PONINGDIVISION
CITY OF RENTON
IM9 1989
r
7. Do you have any plan: future additions, expansions, or ')er activity, related
to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain.
NONE
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
NONE
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals .of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
NONE
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
BUILDING PERMIT FORM CITY OF' RENTON
APPROVAL FROM CONSTRUCTION UNIT OF DSHS
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
THE PROPOSAL CONSISTS OF INFILLING APPROXIMATELY 2800 S.F. ON THE SECOND
FLOOR OF THE HOSPITAL TO HOUSE AN ADDITION TO THE BIRTH CENTER. THE
SITE AREA DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION IS APPROXIMATELY 5,500 S.F.
•
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a.range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED AT VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, 400 SOUTH 43RD
STREET, RENTON, .WASHINGTON WHICH IS AT THE NW CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION
OF SOUTH 43RD STREET AND TALBOT ROAD JUST EAST OF SR167. .THE PROPOSAL IS
LOCATED ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF THE HOSPITAL, INFILLING UNDER EXISTING
PATIENT WING IN NORTHEAST..CORNER OF HOSPITAL.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other
MODERATELY SLOPING HILLSIDE.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
40-50% ON SIDE SLOPES OF DITCHES AND EMBANKMENTS
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classi?ication of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
FROM SOILS SURVEY, KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON, SCS, NOVEMBER 1973,
ON SITE SOILS ARE ALDERWOOD GRAVELLY SANDY LOAM (UNIFIED SOIL. CLASSI-
FICATION "SM") . THE ARCHITECTURAL CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION IS IV E-2.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe..
NONE
•
- 2 -
Describe 1 )urpose, type, and approximate tities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
•
CONSTRUCTION WILL BE AT EXISTING GRADES. GRADING WILL BE REQUIRED
FOR ACCESS AREAS.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
EROSION COULD OCCUR ONLY DURING CONSTRUCTION AS GROUND COVER IS
REMOVED AND EXCAVATION PERFORMED, EXPOSING BARE SOIL ON SLOPES.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
TOTAL HOSPITAL PROPERTY EQUALS 32 ACRES. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF
PROJECT-APPROXIMATELY 70% IMPERVIOUS/AFTER CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT
-APPROXIMATELY 70% IMPERVIOUS, NO CHANGE.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
PROPER MEASURES WILL BE TAKEN TO CONTROL EARTH, IF ANY: EROSION DURING
THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. PROPER GRADING AND REVEGETATION OF THE
FINISHED PROJECT WILL PREVENT EROSION UPON COMPLETION OF THE CONSTRUCTION
PROCESS.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES WOULD
OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emission?
NO, EXCEPT VEHICLE EXHAUST FROM TRAFFIC ON ADJACENT STREETS.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
PROPER MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF CONSTRUCITON EQUIPMENT TO
CONTROL EXHAUST EMISSIONS, DURING CONSTRUCTION.
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
A SMALL STREAM FLOWS THROUGH A RAVINE NORTH OF THE SITE, THENCE NORTH
AND WEST THROUGH THE VALLEY DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND INTO THE BLACK RIVER.
THERE IS ALSO A LOCAL WETLAND AREA IN THE LOW AREA NORTHEAST OF. THE
SITE.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
NONE .
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
NONE ,
- 3 -
4) Will the pro; d require surface water withdrav, or diversions? Give •
general desci:'.__:.)n, purpose, and approximately if known.
NO
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site plan.
NO
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
NO
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if
known.
NO
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served'(if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
NONE
c. 'Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into ether waters? If so, describe.
- - -
PROJECT DOES NOT MODIFY OR INCREASE THE COLLECTION AND
DISPOSAL OF RUNOFF.
2) • Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
NONE
- 4 -
d. Proposed i. +ures to reduce or control surface ound, and runoff water
impacts, if any: __ -
PROJECT DOES NOT MODIFY OR INCREASE SURFACE, GROUND, OR RUNOFF _
WATER IMPACTS.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
a deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
a evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
o Shrubs
SX grass
o crop or grain
n Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
a other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
GRASS AND PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED TO MATCH ORIGINAL PLANTINGS
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance " getation on the site. if any:
____ 'WILL BE LANDSCAPED TO' MATCH EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE.
S. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
NO
- 5 -
• '
d. Proposed mei $s to preserve or enhance wildlife,: ny: •
LANDSCAPING AND GARDEN AREAS WILL PROVIDE SOME HABITAT FOR
SONGBIRDS CURRENTLY ON SITE.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
NATURAL GAS-FIRED BOILER (EXISTING ON SITE) WILL PROVIDE HEAT FOR
PROJECT, FUEL OIL PROVIDES A BACK-UP SOURCE. ELECTRICITY WILL BE
USED FOR LIGHTING, AND ELECTRICAL POWER NEEDS.
•
•
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
NO
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts. if any:
MEET OR EXCEED ALL APPLICABLE ENERGY CODE REQUIREMENTS.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
NO
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
NONE
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
NONE
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
TRAFFIC NOISE FROM ADJACENT STREETS AND ROADWAYS.
- 6 -
• 2) What.type. levals of noise would be createAhor associated with the
Project on a short-term or a long-term bass(for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
SHORT TERM NOISE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION (LIMITED TO DAYLIGHT HOURS).
LONG TERM NOISE IMPACTS-NONE.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
NONE
•
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
SITE CONTAINS EXISTING HOSPITAL FACILITIES. PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE
INFILL ON NE SIDE OF EXISTING HOSPITAL. NE, EAST, AND SOUTH OF SITE
ARE MEDICAL OFFICES AND ASSOCIATED USES, WITH A FEW RESIDENCES. NORTH,
AND NW OF SITE IS VACANT LAND-GREENBELT AREA ALONG DRAINAGE RAVINE.
WEST OF SITE IS FREEWAY RAMP AND SR167. WEST OF FREEWAY IS MIXED
COMMERCIAL.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
NO
c. Describe any structures on the site.
NONE IN CONSTRUCTION AREA
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
NO
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
P-1 (PUBLIC ZONE)
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
NO
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project? -
AT TIMES OF MAXIMUM USAGE, APPROXIMATELY 10 STAFF, 6 PATIENTS AND
12 VISITORS WOULD OCCUPY THE COMPLETED PROJECT.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
NONE
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
NONE
- 7 -
1. Proposed me 3s to ensuro the proposal is corn )1e with existing and
projected lane uses and plans, if any: '
PROJECT IS A PERMITTED USE FOR EXISTING P-1 ZONE.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
NONE
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
NONE
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
NONE
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
THE PROJECT IS AN INFILL UNDER THE EXISTING HOSPITAL THIRD FLOOR.
THE EXTERIOR SHALL BE AN EXTERIOR INSULATION AND FINISH SYSTEM,
PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING HSOPITAL.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
NONE
•
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic.impacts, if any:
THE PROPOSED INFILL WILL BE VISUALLY CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING
HOSPITAL PROJECT. THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ON THE EXISTING
SLOPING TOPOGRAPHY WILL HAVE A MINIMAL IMPACT ON EXISTING VIEWS
FROM ADJACENT ROADS AND BUILDINGS.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
LIGHT FROM THIS PROJECT WILL COME PRIMARILY FROM WITHIN THE BUILDING
THROUGH WINDOWS. PEDESTRIAN AREAS AT EXIT WILL BE PROVIDED WITH
LUMINAIRES FOR NIGHT-TIME ILLUMINATION.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
NO
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
NONE. SITE IS SCREENED FROM VEHICLE HEADLIGHTS ON SR167 BY
ROADSIDE EMBANKMENTS AND VEGETATION.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
NONE
- 8 -
•
{ tM f
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal, recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
NONE
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
NONE
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities'to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
THE PROJECT WILL MAINTAIN GRASSY SEATING AREA EAST OF PATIENT WING.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
NONE
b. Generally describe any landmarks- or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
NONE
C. • Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
NONE
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
SOUTH 43RD STREET, TALBOT ROAD AND SR167
b: Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
YES
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
PROJECT HAS NO IMPACT ON NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
NONE
- 9 -
fit. r `!►
e. Will the pro, use (or occur in the immediate ty of) water, rail, or
air transportd� n? If so, generally describe.
THE HOSPITAL IS SERVED BY AN EXISTING HELICOPTER. LANDING PAD NEAR
THE NE CORNER OF THE SITE. •
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
NONE
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
NONE
15. Public Services
• a. • Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)?
If so, generally describe. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT REQUIRE
A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN_THE LEVEL OF PUBLIC SERVICES ALREADY
PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING HOSPITAL. THE PROJECT WILL ENHANCE AND
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any.
NONE
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or
in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. •
• UTILITY SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED BY EXTENSION OF SERVICE
LINES FROM THE EXISTING HOSPITAL FACILITY. NECESSARY CONNECTIONS
WILL BE MADE AS PART OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.
•
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part. •
Proponent: ( rwc� (Z2►'u
Name Printed:
Monica Brennan
- 10 -
#176 11-8-89
400 South 43rd Street {f^1
Renton, WA 98055
206.228.3450
Valley
Medical
Center PLANNING
CITY OF RENTON
MAY 2 1989 r
May 2, 1989
Mr. Don Erickson
Zoning Administrator
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Birth Center Project
Dear Don,
This letter is to follow up on several missed or unreturned phone
calls regarding the expansion project of the Valley Medical Center
Birth Center. Apparently, you have communicated to our architects
that this project will require a Site Plan Review as well as a SEPA
checklist. In addition, you expressed the concern that the
hospital should be required to do another Generic Master Plan.
We are surprised that you consider this a "project" under the P-1
zoning. As you know, this space is surrounded by floor, ceiling,
support columns, and one wall; the project is simply the addition
of three walls in existing space that was originally prepared for
expansion. It does not expand the "footprint" of the existing
building.
As to the SEPA review, it would appear that the project would be
exempt as a minor alteration, as the square footage is
approximately 2800 square feet.
As to the requirement of a Master Plan, the hospital recently
prepared such a plan pursuant to a SEPA mitigation requirement for
the medical office building. This Master Plan was submitted to the
City in November 1987, and we have yet to receive comments or
feedback from the City on this Plan. Please reference Monica
Brennan' s cover letter to you dated November 3 , 1987, for specific
information regarding the Master Plan Submittal. In addition,
• supplemental information on the Labor, Delivery, and Recovery area
was filed with the City on February 5, 1988 (note pages 13a and
27a) .
At a recent meeting at the City, John Scott and I were admonished
by several of the City of Renton department heads regarding the
importance of following the City processes and not wasting City
Mr. Don Erickson
May 2 , 1989
Page 2
resources by making changes in hospital plans. This appears to be
a case where the City is choosing to use its valuable resources
unnecessarily in over-scrutinizing a project. We believe that
reference to the Master Plan will confirm that projects we are
undertaking are not only consistent with the Plan, but generally
improve on its originally-intended result.
We would very much appreciate your review and reconsideration of
this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to call.
Ver ruly/ ours,
Eric J. T • an
General •. sel
cc: Mike Parness
Ken Nyberg '
Larry Springer
Ron Nelson
EJT:psd