Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSWP271302Shoo Plat (SHPL-# REQUEST FOR PROTECT # Prelim flat (PP# CAG # ) To: Technical Services Date 3A-742-z WO# Green# From: Plan Review/Project Manager ki.Ite DOZr , Project Name E- AA / 9} 7 / 3 0 (70 charadcrs max) Description of Project: C COfi12 g ty eiAP Circle Size of Waterline: 8" 10" 12" Circle One: Circle Size of Sewerline: 8" 10" 12" Circle One: Circle Size of Stormline: 12" 15" 18" 24" Circle One: Address or Street Name(s) Dvlpr/Contractor/Owner/Cnslt: New or Extension New or Extension New or Extension PA! 7-ec T F-C-AA P c (70 characters ) Check each discipline involved in Project Ltr Drwg # of sheets per discipline f7 Trans -Storm Z?Ics ii. ❑ ❑ (Road way/Drainagc) (Off site improvcmcnts)(include basin name) ❑ Transportation (Signalizstion. Channclizatio0. Ughting) ❑ ❑ ❑ Wastewater ❑ ❑ sanitary Sewer Main (include basin name) ❑ Water (Mains. valves, Hydrants) ❑ ❑ (include 7FSC sheets) (Include composite & Horizontal Co Sheets) Suface Water ❑ ❑ Improvements ( LY)(includc basin name) TS Use Only •SW9 _2' -•/3 0z _ l3 d Z n ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-000 July 29, 1987 Mr. Donald J. LaBeIle, Director King Co. Department of Public Works 900 King Co. Admin. Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Flood Control Assistance Account Program (FCAAP) Dear Mr. LaBelle: This letter gives authorization to King County that work begun on July 29, I987 on the following project will be eligible for FCAAP funding: City of Renton - 1987 Lower Cedar River East Bank Emergency Repairs This project was included in a grant agreement for the previous biennium, however the work was unable to be completed due to the timing require- ments on the Hydraulic Proiect Approval from the Department of Fisheries. Verbal approval was previously given from Carl Glatze that this project could be funded during the current biennium. This project was also in- cluded as your Priority No. 6 application with the applications submitted by King County for the current biennium. The authorization provided by this letter only provides that work done on this project will be included in a future grant agreement which will provide a maximum of $25,000 in state funds. All necessary permits or approvals must also be obtained prior to beginning construction. If you have any questions on this, please call me at 459-6791 or Carl Glatze at 459-6776. JL:mg cc: Charles Price, City of Auburn Jerry Creek, Surface Water Mgmt. Sincerely, Jerry Louthain, Supervisor Floodplain Management Section Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program i AUG 17 1987 I:f;G'!�EER!M8 OEPT. FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (FCAAP) Grant Applications Priority Ranking 1. 1987 Lower Cedar River Channel Dredqinq: The present capacity of the Cedar River channel is insufficient and causes frequent flooding of the Renton Airport, the Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton Cedar River Park. Dredging of the Cedar River Channel will preserve the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. The work includes dredging of the Cedar River Channel between Lake Washington and the Logan Street Bridge. The material will then have to be hauled and stockpiled at locations provided by the City. 2. 1987 Lower Cedar River - East Bank Repairs: These repairs are for erosion damage and will protect Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton Cedar River Park. The work involves repair of the Cedar River East Bank, from its mouth at Lake Washington to the Logan Avenue N. Bridge. 3. 1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repair; Dredging of the Cedar River Channel will preserve the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. Dredging and bank repairs are being performed annually, as funds permit, to accomplish the 100 year capacity. The work involves dredging and bank repairs between Lake Washington and the Logan Street Bridge. 4. Maplewood Creek Restoration: Maplewood Creek extends through the Maplewood Golf Course and under the Maple Valley Highway. The flood project will mitigate flood damage to Maplewood Creek, Maplewood Golf Course, Maple Valley Highway, and to residential subdivisions on the south side of the highway. The scope of work involves engineering and construction for the removal of gravel and sediments in the channel and settling basins in order to restore capacity and prevent downstream facility plugging. Stabilization of existing banks with rock rip rap and checkdams is also necessary for the protection against further erosion. 5. May Creek Stream Channel - Erosion Protection: The work included in this project is outlined in the "May Creek Basin Plan". This basin plan was developed by King County and the City of Renton, with King County being the lead agency. 2J1.01.O1.cp:jlm King County Department of Public Works Donald J. LaBelle, Director 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-2517 June 1, 1987 Charles E. Price City of Renton Storm Water Utility 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Flood Control Assistance Account Program Meeting Dear Mr. Price: RECEIVED JUN 1198T ENGINEERING DEPT. CITY OF RENTON This letter is a confirmation of the telephone conversation my staff recently had with you about the Flood Control Assistance Account Program meeting sched- uled for 9:00 a.m, on Tuesday, June 2, 1987 in the Surface Water Management Conference Roan (701 Dexter Horton Building). Please be prepared to give a brief (5-minute) presentation of each application submitted by your agency. The presentation should address each of King County Ranking Criteria and the Department of Ecology's Flood Control Assistance Account Program "Guidelines" (enclosed). At the end of the presentations, we will ask each participant to submit a written recommendation about the ranking of all the applications. Please call Wendy Jackson, Claims Analyst, at 344-7473 if there are questions about this process. Sincerely, _7r 14 Y�-4 n_ r- 42_ Joseph J. Simmer, Ph.D. Manager Surface Water Management Division JS:WJ:ds(L-0284) Enclosures cc: Donald J. LaBelle, Director ATTN: Jim Kramer, Assistant Manager, Surface Water Management Division Brad Miyake, Manager, Finance and Billing Section Wendy Jackson, Claims Analyst, Finance and Billing Section Dave Clark, Manager, River and Water Resource Section CITY OF RENTON Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Design/Utility Engineering FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (FCAAP) Grant Applications Priority Ranking 1. 1987 Lower Cedar River Channel Dredqin The present capacity of the Cedar River channel is insufficient and causes frequent flooding of the Renton Airport, the Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton Cedar River Park. Dredging of the Cedar River Channel will preserve the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. The work includes dredging of the Cedar River Channel between Lake Washington and the Logan Street Bridge. The material will then have to be hauled and stockpiled at locations provided by the City. 2. 1987 Lower Cedar River - East Bank Repairs: These repairs are for erosion damage and will protect Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton Cedar River Park. The work involves repair of the Cedar River East Bank, from its mouth at Lake Washington to the Logan Avenue N. Bridge. 3. 1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs: Dredging of the Cedar River Channel will preserve the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. Dredging and bank repairs are being performed annually, as funds permit, to accomplish the 100 year capacity. The work involves dredging and bank repairs between Lake Washington and the Logan Street Bridge. 4. Maplewood Creek Restoration: Maplewood Creek extends through the Maplewood Golf Course and under the Maple Valley Highway. The flood project will mitigate flood damage to Maplewood Creek, Maplewood Golf Course, Maple Valley Highway, and to residential subdivisions on the south side of the highway. The scope of work involves engineering and construction for the removal of gravel and sediments in the channel and settling basins in order to restore capacity and prevent downstream facility plugging. Stabilization of existing banks with rock rip rap and checkdams is also necessary for the protection against further erosion. 5. Mav Creek Stream Channel - Erosion Protection: The work included in this project is outlined in the "May Creek Basin Plan". This basin plan was developed by King County and the City of Renton, with King County being the lead agency. 2J1.Ol.Ol.cp:jlm OAAP Evaluation ;;riteria 1` 0-7 / . %- - J /6r-7/ / Ia04 �P1/I. //.._/w #A. Jw . •ww� / / /_ ..i Possible &-V F Lrp[I r- oe* / / o / wP.M P- LrCffOJ✓' i ./- - ---D - i - �• - .- I - I.;O iC w..- Je, Points / O. eC/IP /3 l�{/x� / rs �.C�o►n �' �P /I^ S' �� i�c' //0�-' , �GC Oi 1 / ' 1. Proposed project involves maintenance of an existing flood ood control 10 Maur SP�rnrn/a facility (dredging is only eligible if it involves the removal or materials from a designed sedimentation basin). rC�S I InC�V c�l� improve- �ASI %�aYn•1��, � _ �( /7Wa\ 9 / 2. Lack of action could result in damage to or loss of a public based amount of Airr'l, Ave"4 c.-,,,� ment within the next two years; points assigned upon �%��ec`►1h damage or loss. qCt my rS ' - J �aJ'�l C �7p!�urS-P 1 - 10,000 = 10 10 , 000 - 50,000 = 15 cc cum, 750,000 - 100,000 = 20 anA�naIY -7100 , 000 - 500,000 = 25 '7500,000 2X- f. + = 30 o 3. Lack of action could result in damage to or loss of private i mprov - gde ► h r (�3,uo�,c04) ' dA.�.( �11. M �I ments within the next two years; points assigned based upon amount of 6y t tiVV I'r- &t OtiIt�f 7'k, damage or loss. ," 1 - 1U,OU0 > 10, Do - 50,000 = 5 7 ODU 10 301 he,� Hc1 n •\-Q ti- fI4 �{ } 50 , 000 - 100 , = d,,OPi IdhznJ F� 100,000 - 500 , ODU = 15 do fic 6-gW,CJ,o - 7500,000 + = 2U 14 .r,6tv, . 4. Lack of action within the next two years could result in damage to 10 i �< r� n _ fi � in -stream resources or valuable riparian wildlife habitat. s�K� . 1`r`reSt,Qr1c � od�Ts �. Lack of action within the next two years could result in loss of 5 private unimproved land. : o. Lack of action w,tni n the next two years could result in loss of i _0 productive agricultural land. (41.,.-) 3C I Ae f:-�140 Illeew, c3 _ J S . Cindy 5rus h 7 J ar.Gsor► Pa.-� Ao . �yy-z sds- 879 —964f �, (o25- S177 3 �4—W73 0 FCAAP Evaluation Criteria Possible Points 1. Proposed project involves maintenance of an existing flood control 10 facility (dredging is only eligible if it involves the removal of materials from a designed sedimentation basin). 2. Lack of action could result in damage to or loss of a public improve- ment within the next two years; points assigned based upon amount of damage or loss. 1 - 10,000 = 10 -710,000 - 50,000 = 15 50,000 - 100,000 = 20 100,000 - 500,000 = 25 ,,500,000 + = 30 3. Lack of action could result in damage to or loss of private improve- ments within the next two years; points assigned based upon amount of damage or loss. 1 - 1U,000 = 1 �10,000 - 50,000 = 5 750,000 - 100,000 = 10 100,000 - 500,000 = 15 7 500,000 + = 20 4. Lack of action within the next two years could result in damage to 10 in -stream resources or valuable riparian wildlife habitat. 5. Lack of action within the next two years could result in loss of 5 private unimproved land. 6. Lack of action within the next two years could result in loss of 10 productive agricultural land. (415.1) Soue ;c4 A r y� Aw. sW Y• - J „r \� SLICE Mainline . t l i ''� • Puoe� Sound Shofe i 1('c I 0 S o u A �yy 04 v...400 00 ADO N . r'r S2 AVE Y! � � au x c Av n n f•yY[l( r ar r� F s!■ r zN W! +w CIA e ' ' +. i 1 Iater ay t+ ,+ wt M.Avg I* = yll, :ti)* << prt". •}C�qq' �„ I y 9 = exe, pia x�C tynl E l l 1 0 T n �° 18c%'rJ.i '1 y a a _ a rvt rw f 7 n rt _ 50 r �: m otMoat � xm *Arenelr BAY � ; _ . r �r s ii a,t r:r 'b;z 1 !w ` y s x��2 r j •MNC nr1� oAvg ' _tom ii m - a r ::I^� tl O�1011 T•r0 y •v xAvg t KIRA c9r i. •ter _ — 1 • ' i illmgiord — J °�' y E •qY �� Q� y ,(,^.� �b trf� � f •ve r f � • � . . _ . �/ _r(1 • � _ �y a a, a I ' � _ .. f, n.al j_, 9w. ry y- • v _—_ 'T7T — ►•— a art •o x[ `�- aiRrowr rr ucaorar .[ w •[ •'� ` - � WE f ; „a [ ti':[ ! ()IIIYeISI� art c x[ u�. .i �i a''� ! v `+ �t } • JiQ� ! aw• c }, .� j /Art`Y La\ 'r r ) •vc [ av t ~ ..C�1"� ' Avg x +a�f ter TY 'n Cr—[ �a\\Q va w .: 4 xi ]"•� n is °O Avg x[ )r 7 ! tt •r. t _ Madrona $rL �� t R " o i r AVE J4 y a RAIN'th Avg Av! LA �N S O or � ; m •v+.�7�J lei 1 �[ � t ,^) i+�) trr .fir �. � � > • a, r � Al ♦ �n� �;y�, �1.; `� �tl• (Rl t,, KI r-,`° 1 t• , 'Y �Jd. a I..•.i .r .t T+a,,+y rye ;,I J , �t •i' jM - ',ro � �! •ir�. Z+ i r��. %�, y�.Jt F�i��1�v� T � '� r _ F I G U R E Tov Of SM rrt I ' t.. i t r. .. 1 �i! r �F� r f .1.� YIa��C'A� 1 �'�� a 1 "�' ! t�l� tJ a• ` t _ �Lc QLSU w rg, 0, MAY 2 2 187 KINIG `'JUNI Y r r C Q —SMACcr WA W- ASEtita? f3iil{Si N '•,, ,k �„ (low.;.J,�,�. u:c.�-•3ow:a..._.,a�ii�Yn� r.i.�..,& _ ..::�t.'`' L.n3ta�,,r r°�i _•� ._.' .iY _._:�.. �;.1�.,� 1...1:rri .� �....� zm PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 TO: King County DATE: JOB NO.: 710 - 3rd Avenup RE: Dewtev Her- Bldg., eft -Rm—v — Sear l e- WA ()SIC)] ATTN: Wendy Jackson GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS o PRINTS ❑ REPRODUCIBLE PLANS o SPECIFICATIONS o COPY OF LETTER ❑ Grant Application THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ FOR APPROVAL. ❑ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE o APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION o AS REQUESTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPIES TO: SIGNED TITLE IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (FCAAP) Grant Applications Priority Ranking 1. 1987 Lower Cedar River Channel Dredqin The present capacity of the Cedar River channel is insufficient and causes frequent flooding of the Renton Airport, the Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton Cedar River Park. Dredging of the Cedar River Channel will preserve the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. The work includes dredging of the Cedar River Channel between Lake Washington and the Logan Street Bridge. The material will then have to be hauled and stockpiled at locations provided by the City. 2. 1987 Lower Cedar River - East Bank Repairs: These repairs are for erosion damage and will protect Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton Cedar River Park. The work involves repair of the Cedar River East Bank, from its mouth at Lake Washington to the Logan Avenue N. Bridge. 3. 1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs:_ Dredging of the Cedar River Channel will preserve the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. Dredging and bank repairs are being performed annually, as funds permit, to accomplish the 100 year capacity. The work involves dredging and bank repairs between Lake Washington and the Logan Street Bridge. 4. Maplewood Creek Restoration: Maplewood Creek extends through the Maplewood Golf Course and under the Maple Valley Highway. The flood project will mitigate flood damage to Maplewood Creek, Maplewood Golf Course, Maple Valley Highway, and to residential subdivisions on the south side of the highway. The scope of work involves engineering and construction for the removal of gravel and sediments in the channel and settling basins in order to restore capacity and prevent downstream facility plugging. Stabilization of existing banks with rock rip rap and checkdams is also necessary for the protection against further erosion. 5. May Creek Stream Channel - Erosion Protection: The work included in this project is outlined in the "May Creek Basin Plan". This basin plan was developed by King County and the City of Renton, with King County being the lead agency. 2Jl.Ol.Ol.cp:jlm STATE OF WASHINGTON GRANT NO. DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY DATE RECEIVED (ECOLOGY IiSE ONLY) APPLICATION FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (Chapter 86.26 RCW) COUNTY PRIORITY RATING OF 1. APPLICANT a. Name of Entity City of Renton b. Department/Division Storm Water Utility c. Address 200 Mill Avenue So., Renton, WA 98055 d. County King e. Telephone No. (206) 235-2631 f. Contact Person Charles E. Price 2. COUNTY ENGINEER a. Name b. Address c. Phone No. 3. PROJECT a. Title 1987 T.Q1,7Pr Cpdgr_ River - Fast Rank Repair _ b. Location: Water Body Cedar River Section 78,18 Township z 3 ___ Range _ 5_— Note: Attach detailed plans, construction drawings, vicinity maps & general plan. 4. TYPE OF GRANT a. Comprehensive Flood Control Management Plan b. y Nonemergency Project c. Emergency Project 5. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 50, 097.00 Attach detailed breakdown of estimated costs. 6. TOTAL STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $ 25,000.00 7. SOURCE OF LOCAL MATCH general obligation funds ( ) cash ( ) revenue bonds/ certificates { ) other ( ) 8. PROJECT DURATION FROM: Jules 1, ._1987 To: August 15, 1987 rcv nso-Io 1 S. FLOOD FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior 100 Year Flood Frequency Present Year Flood Frequency Future _100-- - Year Flood Frequency Not Applicable *Phase improvements will provide 100 year flood protection. 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS Attach a detailed description of the proposal and alternatives that were considered. Describe the public benefit in detail and demonstrate how alternatives would be less beneficial to the public. Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate floor] damages. 11. STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN Planning process has not been initiated Preparation underway _-X_ Completed _ -- Anticipated completion date 12 HAS AN ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (SEPA) BEEN MADE FOR THIS PROJECT OR FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THIS PROJECT? YES (X) NO ( ) (Please enclose environmental documentation) 13. APPROVALS/PERMITS STATUS a. HYDRAULICS PROJECT APPROVAL pending ( ) date received_ 01/11/85 preliminary consultation ( ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes (X) no ( ) NA ( ) b. CORPS PERMIT pending ( 1 date received- 04/ZIA- ._- preliminary consultation ( ) yes (X) no ( ) NA ( ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c. SHORELINE PERMIT pending ( 1 date received_02114/83 preliminary consultation ( ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes (X) no ( ) NA ( ) d. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION pending ( ) date received preliminary consultation ( ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes ( 1 no ( ) NA (X ) e. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT pending (X) date received - preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f. OTHER (list) pending ( ) date received. 01/01/82 State Dept. of Natural Resources preliminary consultation ( ) yes (X) no ( ) NA ( ) 14. SIGNATURE of authorized representative of APPLICANT tuc��( l'k'��r-,� Date ichard C. Houghton, Pu{lic Works Director SIGNATURE of authorized representative of COUNTY (if different from above) Date F BUDGET INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE 1987 Lower Cedar River - East Bank Repairs PROJECT DESCRIPTION Repair of the Cedar River East bank, from its mouth at Lake Washington to the Logan Ave. N. Bridge. BID ITEMS * UNITS QUANTITY UNIT COST COST Heavy & Loose Rip Rap Tons 629 25.00 $15,725.00 Cahions Tnstalled � 1- Yd, __.._1Z ._——13.I..QQ _23,490.00 �i 1 tar .Rl ankr�t _Tnng — _ 465 _12-0.0------- 5, 980.00 -Hack_Ei11 — C„__yd� 3bb-------_3--DIl 1,nc)8_nn Wi l i qw Plants tea300_ 50 _ 450.00 TOTAL BID ITEMS COST $46, 343.00 DESIGN PRE -ENGINEERING -- ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS -- INSPECTION FEE MISCELLANEOUS -- SALES TAX * (attach additional sheets if necessary.) 3, 754.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $50.097.00 I 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS 1987 Lower Cedar River - East Bank Emergency Repairs These repairs are for erosion damage and will protect Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton Cedar River Park. This work involves repair of the Cedar River East Bank, from its mouth at Lake Washington to the Logan Avenue N. Bridge. 3VAP4 STATE OF WASHINGTON GRANT NO. DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY DATE col,'O Y 11 M r (FCOI:OCY Ii4i ONLY) �yd en� a°yam APPLICATION FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (Chapter 86.26 RCW) COUNTY PRIORITY RATING OF 1. APPLICANT a. Name of Entity City of Renton b. Department/Division Storm Water Utility _ C. Address 200 Mill Avenue So. d. County Xing e. Telephone No. (206) 235-2631 f. Contact Person Charles E, Price 2. COUNTY ENGINEER a. Name b. Address c. Phone No. 3. PROJECT a. Title May Creek Stream Channel - Erosion Protection b. Location: Water Body _May_ CreekSection — 32__Township 24 __ flange_ >__ Note: Attach detailed plans, construction drawings, vicinity maps & general plan. 4. TYPE OF GRANT a. Comprehensive Flood Control Management Plan b. X Nonemergency Project c. Emergency Project 5. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 284, 800. 00 Attach detailed breakdown of estimated costs. G. TOTAL STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $ 142,400.00__ 7. SOURCE OF LOCAL MATCH general obligation funds ( ) cash ( ) revenue bonds/ certificates (Y) other ( ) B. PROJECT DURATION FROM: July 1, -- - To. E:cv 0 30-10 1 -9, FLOOD FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior Year Flood Frequency Present Year Flood Frequency Future ----- Year Flood Frequency Not Applicable X 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS Attach a detailed description of the proposal and alternatives that were considered. Describe the public benefit in detail and demonstrate how alternatives would be less beneficial to the public. Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. *Please see attached excerpts from the May Creek Basin Plan 11. STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN Planning process has not been initiated Preparation underway X Completed __ Anticipated completion date 12. HAS AN ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (SEPA) BEEN MADE FOR THIS PROJECT OR FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THIS PROJECT? YES ( ) NO ( ) (Please enclose environmental documentation) 13. APPROVALS/PERMITS STATUS a. HYDRAULICS PROJECT APPROVAL pending ( } date received-. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( } no (X) NA ( ) b. CORPS PERMIT pending ( ) date received__—__. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( ) no (X) NA ( ) c. SHORELINE PERMIT pending ( } date received --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( ) no ( X) NA ( ) d. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION pending ( ) date received ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( ) no ( X ) NA ( ) e. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT pending ( ) date received_.____ preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( ) no (X) NA ( ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f. OTHER (list) pending ( ) date received____. preliminary consultation ( } yes ( ) no (X ) NA ( ) 14. SIGNATURE of authorized representative of APPLICANT Date Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director SIGNATURE of authorized representative of COUNTY (if different from above) - - - --- -- --- ---- ----- — - _.. __ Date 2 BUDGET INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE May Creek Stream Channel Erosion Protection PROJECT DESCRIPTION Design and construction of channel protection from erosion by means of drop structures, bank protection, and hillside drainage protection. BID ITEMS * UNITS Drop Structures Urniec A)_ L.S. Rank Protprtinn (Prniprt 1) T. -S. Hillside Drainage Protection L.S. (Project 5) QUANTITY UNIT COST COST $110,000.00 60,000.00 50,000.00 TOTAL BID ITEMS COST $220,000.00 DESIGN PRE -ENGINEERING ! 15,000.00 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS 10,000.00 INSPECTION FEE 2,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS (Contingencies) 20,000.00 SALES TAX 17,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $284,800.00 1 * (attach additional sheets if necessary.) Is VA STATE OF WASHINGTON a b IQ v W ^ n DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY �y/ens a°y APPLICATION GRANT NO. DATE RECEIVED (ECol,OCY IiSr ONLY) FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (Chapter 86.26 RCW) COUNTY PRIORITY RATING OF 1. APPLICANT a. Name of Entity City of Renton b. Department/Division Storm Water Utility c. Address 200 Mill Avenue So. d. County King e. Telephone No. (206) 235-2631— f. Contact Person Charles E. Price 2. COUNTY ENGINEER a. Name b. Address c. Phone No. 3. PROJECT a. Title Ma 4Qd CrQ_e) _Restoration b. Location: Water Body -NSaplewnod__CrPPk — Section 5,21, --Township —23Range Note: Attach detailed plans, construction drawings, vicinity maps & general plan. 4. TYPE OF GRANT a. Comprehensive Flood Control Management Plan b, y Nonemergency Project c. Emergency Project 5. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 63,510, 00 Attach detailed breakdown of estimated costs. 6. TOTAL STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $ 31 , 755.00�___ 7. SOURCE OF LOCAL MATCH general obligation funds ( ) cash ( ) revenue bonds/ certificates W other { ) 8. PROJECT DURATION FROM: July 1,, _.1987_ __._. To: duly ECY n30-10 1 9.' FLOOp FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior Year Flood Frequency Present Year Flood Frequency Future _ 25 _ Year Flood Frequency Not Applicable 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS Attach a detailed description of the proposal and alternatives that were considered. Describe the public benefit in detail and demonstrate how alternatives would be less beneficial to the public. Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. 11. STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN Planning process has not been initiated Preparation underway —X_ Completed _— Anticipated completion date 12. HAS AN ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (SEPA) BEEN MADE FOR THIS PROJECT OR FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THIS PROJECT? YES ( ) NO (X) (Please enclose environmental documentation) 13. APPROVALS/PERMITS STATUS a. HYDRAULICS PROJECT APPROVAL pending ( ) date received_ _. preliminary consultation (X) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) b. CORPS PERMIT pending ( ) date received_ preliminary consultation ( X) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) c. SHORELINE PERMIT pending ( ) date received preliminary consultation ( X) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) d. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION pending ( ) date received preliminary consultation ( X) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) e. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT pending ( ) date received_ preliminary consultation (X) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f. OTHER (list) pending ( ) date received-_---- preliminary consultation ( X ) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) 14. SIGNATURE of authorized representative of APPLICANT Date Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director SIGNATURE of authorized representative of COUNTY (if different from above) Date 2 BUDGET INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE Maplewood Creek Restoration PROJECT DESCRIPTION Engineering and construction for the removal of gravel and sediments from the channel and settling basin. Stabilization of currently eroding banks. BID ITEMS UNITS Excavating & Haul Cu. Yds. Tons Plat & evegitation L.S. _f_Le,axin.g&-ebris_ Removal L.S. C1 aan Tin QUANTITY UNIT COST COST 550 $ 5.00 $ 2,750.00 1,750 25.00 43,750.00 -- 500.00 — ---- -- -- --- 1,500.00 1,000.00 TOTAL BID ITEMS COST "500.00 1 DESIGN PRE -ENGINEERING 8,000.00 ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS 1,000.00 INSPECTION FEE _ 1,000.00 MISCELLANEOUS SALES TAX 4,010.00 * (attach additional sheets if necessary.) TOTAL PROJECT COST $63, 510.00 3 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS Maplewood Creek Restoration Maplewood Creek extends through the Maplewood Golf Course and under the Maple Valley Highway. The flood project will mitigate flood damage to Maplewood Creek, Maplewood Golf Course, Maple Valley Highway, and to residential subdivisions on the south side of the highway. The scope of work involves engineering and construction for the removal of gravel and sediments in the channel and settling basins in order to restore capacity and prevent downstream facility plugging. Stabilization of existing banks with rock rip rap and checkdams is also necessary for the protection against further erosion. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY APPLICATION GRANT NO. DATE RECEIVED (ECOLOGY IiSF ONIA) FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (Chapter 86.26 RCW) COUNTY PRIORITY RATING — OF 1. APPLICANT a. Name of Entity City of Renton b. Department/Division Storm Water Utility c. Address 200 Mill Avenue So., Renton, WA- 98055 d. County _King e. Telephone No. 206)_235-2631 f. Contact Person Charles E. Price 2. COUNTY ENGINEER a. Name b. Address c. Phone No. - -- — -- --- --- - ----- -- — - - 3. PROJECT a. Title 1987 Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging b. Location: Water Body `Cedar River _ Section18__Township �3 Range 5 Note: Attach detailed plans, construction drawings, vicinity maps & general plan. 4. TYPE OF GRANT a. __ _ Comprehensive Flood Control Management Plan b. __x Nonemergency Project c. ___ -_ -_ Emergency Project 5. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 185, 175.00 — Attach detailed breakdown of estimated costs. 6. TOTAL STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $ _2, 587. 00-($2.5, 000._00 Previously_ Allocated 7. SOURCE OF LOCAL MATCH general obligation funds ( 1 cash ( ) revenue bonds/ certificates (Y) other ( ) 8. PROJECT DURATION FROM: July 1, 1987 To: August 15, 1987 ECY 0 30- 10 1 -9. FLOOD. FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior 100 Year Flood Frequency Present 3 _- Year Flood Frequency Future __ 1QQ Year Flood Frequency Not Applicable 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS Attach a detailed description of the proposal and alternatives that were considered. Describe the public benefit in detail and demonstrate how alternatives would be less beneficial to the public. Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. 11. STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN Planning process has not been initiated Preparation underway X Completed -- Anticipated completion date 12. HAS AN ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (SEPA) BEEN MADE FOR THIS PROJECT OR FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THIS PROJECT? YES (X ) NO ( ) (Please enclose environmental documentation) 13. APPROVALS/PERMITS STATUS a. HYDRAULICS PROJECT APPROVAL pending ( ) date received_ 01/11/85 preliminary consultation ( ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes ( X) no ( ) NA ( ) b. CORPS PERMIT pending ( ) date received- 11/27/83 preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( X) no ( ) NA ( ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c. SHORELINE PERMIT pending ( ) date received 02/14/83 preliminary consultation ( ) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes ( X) no ( ) NA ( ) d. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION pending ( ) date received preliminary consultation ( ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( X ) e. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT pending (X) date received_.____ preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f. OTHER (list) pending ( ) date received._ 01/01_/82 - SFate Dept. f Natu a1 Resources preliminary consultation ) yes ( ) no ( ) NA { } 14. SIGNATURE of authorized representative of APPLICANT Date Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director SIGNATURE of authorized representative of COUNTY (if different from above) — -- - - - Date i I 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS 1987 Cedar River Dredging The present capacity of the Cedar River channel is insufficient and causes frequent flooding of the Renton Airport, the Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton Cedar River Park. Dredging of the Cedar River Channel will preserve the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. The work includes dredging of the Cedar River Channel between Lake Washington and the Logan Street Bridge. The material will then have to be hauled and stockpiled at locations provided by the City. BUDGET INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE 1987 Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging PROJECT DESCRIPTION Dredging of the Cedar River Channel from Lake Washington to the Lean Street Bridge in_Qrder to preserve the channel's__capacity for the 100-year flood event. BID ITEMS * UNITS Dredging and Haul C.M. Field Surveying L.S. Siltation & Dust Control L.S Clean Up L.S QUANTITY UNIT COST 33,000 $5.00 L.S. L.S. L.S. TOTAL BID ITEMS COST DESIGN PRE -ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS INSPECTION FEE MISCELLANEOUS SALES TAX TOTAL PROJECT COST * (attach additional sheets if necessary.) COST $165,000.00 800.00 500.00 5,000.00 171,300.00 1 13,875.00 185.175.00 C! STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY APPLICATION GRANT NO. DATE RECEIVED (F;C01,0CY IiSr ONLY) FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (Chapter 86.26 RCW) COUNTY PRIORITY RATING OF 1. APPLICANT a. Name of Entity City of Renton _ b. Department/Division Storm Water Utility C. Address 200 Mill Avenue So., Renton, WA 98055 d. County King e. Telephone No. (206) 235-2631 f. Contact Person Charles E. Price 2. COUNTY ENGINEER a. Name b. Address c. Phone No. 3. PROJECT a. Title iggs C'Pc1nr River_ C'hnnnol Dredging and._$.ank Repairs b. Location: Water Body Cedar River _ _Section 7 &_ 18 Township 23 ^Range 5__ Note: Attach detailed plans, construction drawings, vicinity maps & general plan. 4. TYPE OF GRANT a. Comprehensive Flood Control Management Plan b. X Nonemergency Project c. Emergency Project 5. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $ 328, 850. 00 Attach detailed breakdown of estimated costs. 6. TOTAL STATE FUNDS REQUESTED $ 164,425.00 7. SOURCE OF LOCAL MATCH general obligation funds ( ) cash ( ) revenue bonds/ certificates ( y) other ( ) 8. PROJECT DURATION FROM: July 1, 1986 _ _ To: September 1, 1988 r:cY n 30- 1 0 1 9. FLOOD FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior 100 Year Flood Frequency Present 3Year Flood Frequency Future 149_—_—Year Flood Frequency Not Applicable 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS Attach a detailed description of the proposal and alternatives that were considered. Describe the public benefit in detail and demonstrate how alternatives would be less beneficial to the public. Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. 11. STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN Planning process has not been initiated Preparation underway X _ Completed _ _ Anticipated completion date 12. HAS AN ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION (SEPA) BEEN MADE FOR THIS PROJECT OR FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THIS PROJECT? YES (X ) NO ( ) (Please enclose environmental documentation) 13. APPROVALS/PERMITS STATUS a. HYDRAULICS PROJECT APPROVAL pending ( } date received _ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( X) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) b. CORPS PERMIT pending ( ) date received__...____ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( X) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) c. SHORELINE PERMIT pending ( } date received --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( X) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) d. WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION pending ( ) date received --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( ) no ( ) NA (X) e. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT pending (X) date received ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- preliminary consultation ( ) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) f. OTHER (list) pending ( ) date received__-___ _.- State Dept. of Natural Resources preliminary consultation (X) yes ( ) no ( ) NA ( ) 14. SIGNATURE of authorized representative of APPLICANT Date _ Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director SIGNATURE of authorized representative of COUNTY (if different from above) -- - - - --- - -- - - — Date -- 2_ BUDGET INFORMATION PROJECT TITLE 1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repair PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annual dredging and bank repair of the Cedar River Channel to maintain the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. BID ITEMS * UNITS Dredging & Haul Cu. Yd. Field Surveying L.S. Siltation & Dust Control L.S. QUANTITY 40,000 _Iieavy._�_ Loose Rip Rap Tons 500 Gabions Installed Cu. Yd, 500 Sack Fill Cu. Yd. 250 Filter RlankPt 300 Clean Up L.S. Bank Plantings L.S. UNIT COST $ 5.00 25.00 135.00 3.00 12.00 TOTAL BID ITEMS COST DESIGN PRE -ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS INSPECTION FEE MISCELLANEOUS SALES TAX TOTAL PROJECT COST * (attach additional sheets if necessary.) leril-lyl $200,000.00 1,000.00 800.00 12,500.00 67,500.00 750.00 3,600.00 5,000.00 1,500.00 292,650.00 23,700.00 $328,850.00 3 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL AND PUBLIC BENEFITS 1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs Dredging of the Cedar River Channel will preserve the channel's capacity for the 100 year flood event. Dredging and bank repairs are being performed annually, as funds permit, to accomplish the 100 year capacity. The work involves dredging and bank repairs between Lake Washington and the Logan Street Bridge. S. F. No. 4418—OS Form • F. 1 FLOOD CONTROL ZONE APPLICATION NO ..................................... TO THE DIRECTOR Dated....._.0.5/.2.1./..B.7.................................................._.... DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 335 General Administration Building Olympia, Washington 98501 (1) •APPLICATION is hereby made by ........... ity...of Renton .................................................................................................................................. (Individual, corporation, etc.) of .... 20.Q... Mill ... .A.vezzue....�o. ..................................................... for permit to Maintenance and thereafter operate (PostoMee address) (Construct, reconstruct, modify) (2) and maintain ........Qedar.... iver (Nature of works: Bridge, dike, road, revetment, logging works, gravel pits, etc.) (3) to be known as ......... Cedar River Dredging and Bank Repair ........................................................................................................................... (Name of works• structures or improvements) (4) located in ................................................ Section ... ...7&18....., Township.............23....... North, Range ........................... (E) (W) W.M. (Nis Nw%. etc.) City of Renton -............................................................................ (Location with reference to nearest town or well known locality) (5) all or portion of which will be located upon the banks or in and over the channel or over and across the Cedar River Lake Washington flood plain of..........._.................................................................................... a tributary of.............................................g............................................. (Name of stream or body of water) (Name of stream or body of water) in ...... .King ...County ... Flood Control Zone No ........ .3 ............................... .........._...w...._...._.................................................................... (6) This permit is sought ..... _.......... _..In Perpetu.ity ..................................................................................._.........._........... (In perpetuity; or, if temporary, state number of years) (7) Definite location and plan of the proposed works, structures or improvements are shown on attached sheets numbered....................1.............to............... Z.................... inclusive, which are parts of this application. (8) Construction will commence............July. la.. 1.987 _ and will be completed ....... August 15, 1987 (Date) (Date) (9) Remarks: .The work will include dredging of the Cedar River Channel and Bank repairs .._............................_.................................._..................................................................................._......................................................................_................. between Lake Washington and the East City Limits. _..._...._................_.............................. ......... _.... _.................................. ............................................. City of.Renton SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ___...._....._..............._............................................................................... _........... • (AAppIicaant) By... _.......................................................................................... ...... Plans Examined and Reported by Field Examination and Report by Application Returned for Alteration PERMIT Recommended by Issued Name Date TVRR�t- 3 &A I U If I 1 i 4 OOa � I! -- I _Ck_ �d C-Y, -Z -f- 1131-75-0 1164 h k eb - 2v it .. ------ --- I y' y - i II u I) c_ 'jit, l_, . DATE ACTION MEMO ACTION FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED ACTION MEMO DATE: TO 1 �L) ❑ FOR YOUR COMMENT Q PLEASE ADVISE STATUS ❑ PLEASE RETURN ATTACHED ❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ PLEASE TAKE UP WITH ME rl PER YOUR REQUEST ❑ FOR YOUR SIGNATURE ❑ PLEASE HANDLE O PER OUR CONVERSATION ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION p PLEASE FILE SUBJECT: , cf�e1 IOF1 l `,,�v o�C�c�J-�I�..e ApPevwU K C"Aof .fN (t)V 4 SDj )v0�)r CAI �bme� our P"' "f tie c�rre �, �spperol,�x �vrmR� &J,-t an rr c�� b of b . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 OF I24, "IL Z 0 9A 0 9�rFD SEP1E00�P TO: LL(U f- b �G �CV`CS DATE: JOB NO. RE: F010 P 155 - Mb/mcciG Alrr l�tlG 9eosG ATTN: Aelle, jlltAlt�- GENTLEMEN: WE ARI SENDING YOU Al(- ATTACHED ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS o PRINTS ❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ❑ REPRODUCIBLE PLANS ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED pC AS REQUESTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: SPECIFICATIONS ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPIES 10: 1 SIGNED�'��,SQYV J TITLE IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 RE: O F Z 0 9,0 �o• o9�T�o sEPiE�`��`P GENTLEMEN: WE ARE. SENDING YOU o ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS o PRINTS o REPRODUCIBLE PLANS o SPECIFICATIONS ❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ FOR APPROVAL o APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS o FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ COPIES TO: SIGNED TITLE ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US 1�./ -i-,) IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE APPENDIX A PROJECT DESCRIPTION MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (Applicant) City of -Ken A GRANTEE Name: King County Project Title: Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging Project Project Description: This project consists of D,cdc;i� -Pum Lc, w C&� C5�t ' S Q 4jwy.:=-( d/4-1 2�1 42o, c s;2.Vyt$ #-e CI"G IS. Project Completion Date: (� C4 3 t' S7 lc'��aa Estimated Costs for Eligible Work Items Work Item Unit Quantity Dr e K u .,, S Ld1e— Unit Cost )— Cost 7C) 0 0C) Total 701 600 A-2 w APPENDIX A BUDGET INFORMATION MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS Estimated Eligible Cost 1. Work Items 2. Inspection fee 3. Equipment rental 4. Miscellaneous TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST A-3 V % 0 0 o c�) f J5, p CDC:, 606 �.�,71�Cih o�Renton�lyA VT 2 4 1985 APPENDIX A PROJECT DESCRIPTION MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (Applicant) City of -Snoti:aimie Rvvvz>J GRANTEE Name: King County Project Title: Lower Cedar River, East Bank Emergency Repairs Project Project Description: This project consists of Flnt./r or..4i ptWe", �� /Moe" & .� AO Project Completion Date: oc4 31" 1`/� Estimated Costs for Eligible Work Items Work Item Unit Quantit Unit Cost Cost Total 11,-040 oo A-2 APPENDIX A BUDGET INFORMATION MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS Estimated Eligible Cost 1. Work Items 2. Inspection fee 3. Equipment rental 4. liscellaneous TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST A-3 ,5U IMMI, O n Z) 51 v0c) -5- 5, bid �Gc/S N1f'LTCA'1110N puiO 1'IKUT:C1' ASST' VCE ('ON1'ROI, ASSISTANCI ACCOUN. ttOGRl1M (CII. tat .2�i R('W) 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 4. PR(111-'V ' CONTACT PI IZSON Nance __Robert E_,._ Berg,;tr_ om, P_E__ Address City Hall - 200 Mill AyP _S Renton,WA 98n55 Title Engine-e-r } -SJ iParaci snrl'hone # 235-2631 �, l;S'1'1MA'17.D PRQJEO`P Co5'1' (Dollars) Local Share 2 OOOState Grant $25.000 Other Total Cost $50.0� 00 — I •:ME I CTNCY P RQTI-' Ye s O No O 2. COUNTY ENGINEER Name: Don LaBelle: King County Public Works Address: Room 900 - King County Adm. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Phone # 344-2517 Attention: HB 1531 _ 3. PRO =- ' TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging Project duration Annually_ mo/yr. Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area O Name of City or 'Down City of Renton 6. FLOOD FREQULNCY PRC)TECTION PROVIDED BY PROTECT FAC LLITY Prior 100 Yrs; Present 50 Years; Future I00_Years Not Applicable = 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT BEN]E ITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) 3. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND `DOWNS ONLY) N iAT IS Tl IU STATUS OF APPLICANT'S CWMIENSIVE FU= CONTROL MANAC T PI.At1: CattpletO�T Preparation Underway Anticipated Completion Date May, L - 9. SIGNAZURE OF AUTHORIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE Name and Title Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor _ Phone # 235-2580 Date 10. STATUS OF Ccm[,REIi I:NsivE FUJOD CONTROL MIINAGEMLwr PLAN (FOR THIS PROJECT) Completed O Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Dated g85 Certification by County Engineer ___Date he: (to tilt best of my knowltAge t-above inforinaEi7d -is correctT REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of I�I'1'LICA'I'I(>r1 I'OR PItCU1 CP ASSIF ":E IM;'iU',NCY PRC(IL-'f- Yes O No O l'Ilx)I) C(x1'i'it()1, A:;SI; I'AN('I. ACCO UN'I ...tX;R11M (('II. 86.1,0 ROW) 1. NAMI: AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 4. 111411F..Cl' C(MACT I)EIZSON Nank' Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Address City Hall - 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 1'itLE�ineeringSu erv_isoO)hollt' # Z35_2631 '�. 1-:ST1M PE'D 1'RWL•CP C(1S'I' (Doll<<rs) Local Share 2 OOOState Grant S25.000 Other Total Cost $50,000 2. CUUNTY ENGINEER Name: Don LaBelle, King County Public Works Address:Room 900 - King County Adm. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Phone # 344-2517 Attn: HB-1531 3. PROTECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Lower Cedar River - East Bank Emergency Repairs (See attachments) Project duration max_ —_ m%. Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area O Name of City or Town City of Rent 6. FLOOD FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior 100 Yrs; Present 100 Years; Future LQQ Years Not Applicable 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) (See Attachments) Repair Cedar River east bank from mouth at Lake Washington upstream to Logan Ave. N. Bridge. Project protects Boeing Airplane Co. Renton Plant and City Cedar River Park. S. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND TOWNS ONLY) iro1ltY1, IS '111E S'1'A'I'US OF APPLTCAN'1,1S C(14PIU ENSIVE FboOD CONTROL MANAGE ACHr PIX4? Ccyiu,lut�Xi Preparation Underway O Anticipated Canpletion Date _ 1--y �.85 9. SIGTIA'TURE OF AU`I11ORIZED APPLICANT REPREswrA'PIVE 'Typed Nano and Title Barbara Y._Shinpoch, Mayor _ _ Phone # 2_35-2580 Date 10. STATUS OF CCINIPREIIENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEbIENT PLAN (FOR THIS PROJECT) Completed O Preparation Underway O Anticipated Canpletion Date May, 1985 Certification by County Engineer Date (to the best of my knowledge the above inf-oriiiation -is correctT--` RLvISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of IkI'1'LICUP ON FOR 1'RCO171' ASSIf 011 I,M1?IK;1 NCY PRWI Yes O No GD FI(X)1) i1,ON'1'RO1. ASSISTAN(' ACCOU111' 11RXRAM (Cit. 86.26 RCW) 1. NM: AND ADDRESS OF' APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 4. C'm1'A01' 11I?160N Na1v Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Address City Hall - 200 Mill Ave. S. _ Renton, WA_ 98055 Title Engi n e Priing Su rvI�n,PhOne #31 '). I'.STIMA'I'LD PROJLC.`P COST (DO11ars) Local Share 12 00 State Grant $12} 000 Other Total Cost $24�000 2. C0UN'1'Y ENGINEER Name: Don LaBelle, King Cminry Public Works Address: Room�900, Kinq Cnunty ArIm Bldg. SeAttlP,WA 98104 Phone # 344_2517 _ Attn__ HB 1511 3. PI& ECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Cedar and Green Rivers Floodwater Automatic Monitoring (See Attachments) Project duration rhr,p MOARX Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area CD Name of City or Town City of Renton 6. FLOOD FRF*UFNCY PIOPECPION PROVIDED BY PROTECT FACILITY Prior Yrs; Present Years; Fixture Years Not Applicable u 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PRQIECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) Install three automatic flood water level monitors on Cedar River at Burnett Ave. N. Bridge and on the Green River at S. 180th St. and Monster Road Bridge. Data would be transmitted to King County Joint Ships & Emergency 3. (FOR USE BY CI`1'IES AND TOWNS ONLY) WIIAT IS T1IE STATUS OF' APPLICANT'S COMPREILENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGDIEN`I' PIR4? Comp1c feelCD Preparation Underway CDAnticipated Completion Date May_,_ 1.985._ 9. S IGNA`I'URL: OF AU'191ORI ZL:D APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE _ 'ly�rl N.x<ne and '1'itlo Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor _ Phone # 235-2580 _ Date 10. STATUS OF COh1PREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FOR THIS PROJECT) Completed O Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date 11aX A_g25 Certification by County Engineer Date (to the best of any knowledge thL'move inl`omkatiori -is correctT REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of Rent - Cedar River Dredging APPENDIX A BUDGET INFORMATION MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS Estimated Eligible Cost 1. Work Items $45,000 2. Inspection fee 5,000 3. Equipment rental 4. Miscellaneous TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST $50,000 Div v A-3 OF OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON, WASHINGTON Z POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 S 2nd STREET 0 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 255-8678 MAL p LAWRENCE J. WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 0% `O' DAVID M. DEAN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 09gT�D SEPS��O�P MARK E. BARBER, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY ZANETTA L. FONTES, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY May 15, 1986 MARTHA A. FRENCH, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY TO: Dick Houghton, Public Works Director FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Dear Dick: Please find enclosed a copy of Chapter 46 of the Laws of the 1986 Regular Session dealing with State participation in flood control. Apparently there are State monies available for planning and designing specific flood control projects, flood control management plans and flood control maintenance projects. However, the Act requires County and State approval before the City could obtain any funding. Perhaps you could have someone in your Department review this legislation to see if there is any potential benefit in it for the City. Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd Encl. cc: Mayor f Ch. 1 ) REGULAR SESSION Operated telephones, in this state by both the use of coins and the control assistance acc use of a telephone credit card. (3) A state agency that provides an emergency information service chapter. All earning by telephone may establish charges to recover the cost of those control ass:stance acc services. However, an agency charging for the service shall not price it at a profit to create excess revenue for the agency. The Sec. 2. Sectioi agency shall do a total cost-benef°t analysis of the available section 3, chapter 21 methods of providing the service and shall adopt the method that amended to read as fo provides the service at the lowest cost to the user and the agency. Whenever state (4) "Emergency information services," as used in this section, control maintenance p includes information on road and weather conditions. the project is loc Approved March 11. 1986, project and shall sup Effective June 11. 1986, 90 days after date of adjournment. construction and ex consultation with the game, shall be a c FLOOD CONTROL -STATE PARTICIPATION cost of any project CHAPTER 46 project. Additionally, _ HOUSE BILL NO. 1622 preparation of a com AN ACT Relating to flooding; and amending RCW 86.26.007, to be prepared under 86.26.040, 86.26.050, 86.26.100, and 86.26.105. Sec. 3. Section BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: section 1, chapter amended to read as f Sec. 1. Section 1, chapter 212, Laws of 1984 as amended by State part section 88, chapter 57, Laws of 1985 and RCW 86.26.007 are each comprehensive flood amended to read as follows: maintenance projects The flood control assistance account is hereby established in the interest, as diffe state treasury. At the beginning of each biennium after June 30, likely to bring aboL 1985, the state treasurer shall transfer from the general fund to the state funds allocate flood control assistance account an amount of money which, when (2) No participa combined with money remaining in the account from the previous occur with a tour biennium, will equal four million dollars. Moneys in the flood director of ecoloc Additions in text are indicated by underline; deletions by 5irikeewts Addition& in t use of coins and the ency information service ecover the cost of those the service shall not nue for the agency. The ysis of the available 11 adopt the method that e user and the agency. ised in this section, itions. CIPATION ending RCW 86.26.007, OF WASHINGTON: 1984 as amended by RCW 86.26.007 are each reby established in the nnium after June 30, the general fund to the t of money which, when 1t from the previous Moneys in the flood etions by 6%r-ikeeuts i9m LANN", Ch. 46 control assistance account may be spent only after appropriation for ro ecte)) *noses specified under this Ala--specified--}let--of--p 7 chapter. All earnings of investments of balances in the flood control assistance account shall be credited to the General fund. Sec. 2. Section 6, chapter 240, Laws of 1951 as amended by section 3, chapter 212, Laws of 1984 and RCW 86.26.040 are each amended to read as follows: Whenever state grants under this chapter are used in a flood control maintenance project, the engineer of the county within which the project is located shall approve all plans for the specific project and shall supervise the work. The approval of such plans, construction and expenditures by the department of ecology, in consultation with the department of fisheries and the department of game, shall be a condition precedent to state participation in the cost of any project beyond planning and designing the specific project. Additionally, state rants may be made to counties For com rehensive flood control mana ement lan required preparation of a to be 2repared under RCW 86.26.050. Sec. 3. Section 7, chapter 240, Laws of 1951 as last amended by section 1, chapter 454, Laws of 1985 and RCW 86.26.050 are each amended to read as follows: 1 State participation shall be in such preparation of comprehensive flood control management plans and flood control maintenance projects as are affected with a general public and state interest, as differentiated from a private interest, and as are likely to bring about public benefits commensurate with the amount of state funds allocated thereto. No participation for flood control maintenance protects may occur with a county or other municipal corporation unless the director of ecology has approved the flood plain management Additions in text are indicated by n rlin ; deletions by atr44e4+46 3 Ch. 46 REGULAR SESSION activities of the county, city, or town having planning jurisdiction Sec. 4. Section 12, over the area where the flood control maintenance project will be, on section 8, chapter 21 the one hundred year flood plain surrounding such area. amended to read as follo The department of ecology shall adopt rules concerning the flood State participation plain management activities of a county, city, or town that are project shall be prov adequate to protect or preclude.flood damage to structures, works, between the director of and improvements, including the restriction of land uses within a county submitting the river's meander belt or floodway to only flood -compatible uses. shall state the estimate Whenever the department has approved county, city, and town flood by•the state. In no in! Plain management activities, as a condition of receiving an the state's share excee( allocation of funds under this chapter, each revision to the flood oroject planning any plain management activities must be approved by the department of comprehensive flood c ecology, in consultation with the department of Etsheries and the 86.26.050 shall not ex department of game. costs, but nct to excee No participation with a county or other municipal and regulation by the d corporation for flood control maintenance oro]ects nayunless .occur Sec. 5. Section 9, the county engineer of the county within which the flood control are each amended to rea maintenance project is located certifies that a comprehensive flood R comprehensive El( control management plan has been completed and adopted by the need for flood control appropriate local authority, or is being prepared for all portions of control work, identi; the river basin or other area, within which the project is located in flood control work on that county, that are subject to flooding with a frequency of one the river's meander b hundred years or less. ((Such)) management plan shall (3) Participation for flood control maintenance projects and years of the certiEic preparation of comprehensive flood control management plans shall be RCW 86.26.050. made from grants made by the department of ecology from the flood If after this thre control assistance account. Comprehensive flood control management flood control plan plans, and any revisions to the plans, must be approved by the flood control maintena department of ecology, in consultation with the department of fisheries and the department of game. municipal corporations control plan is con Additions in text are indicated by underline; deletions by Additions in tex 4 ing planning jurisdiction nance project will be, on such area. Les concerning the flood City, or town that are to structures, works, ion of land uses within a flood -compatible uses. Ity, city, and town flood ion of receiving an ch revision to the flood by the department of ent of fisheries and the my or other municipal rojects :nay occur unless ich the flood control at a comprehensive flood d and adopted by the ared for all portions of he project is located in with a frequency of one ntenance projects and nagement plans shall be ology from the flood lood control management be approved by the th the department of etions by ctoikee Fir. 1986 LAWS Ch. 46 Sec. 4. Section 12, chapter 240, Laws of 1951 as amended by section 8, chapter 212, Laws of 1984 and RCW 86.26.100 are each amended to read as follows: State participation in the cost of any flood control maintenance project shall be provided for by a written memorandum agreement between the director of ecology and the legislative authority of the county submitting the request, which agreement, among other things, shall state the estimated cost and the percentage thereof to be borne by•the state. In no instance, except on emergency projects, shall the state's share exceed one-half the cost of the project, to include project planning and design. However, grants to prepare a comprehensive flood control management plan, required under RCa 86.26.050 shall not exceed seventy=five percent of the full planning costs, but not to exceed amcunts for either purpose specified in rule and regulation by the deDartment of ecoloay. Sec. 5. Section 9, chapter 212, Laws of 1984 and RCW 86.26.105 are each amended to read as follows: A comprehensive flood control management plan shall determine the need for flood control work, consider alternatives to in -stream flood control work, identify and consider potential impacts of in -stream flood control work on the state's in -stream resources, and identify the river's meander belt or floodway. A comprehensive flood control management plan shall be completed and adopted within at least three years of the certification that it is being prepared, as provided in RCW 86.26.050. If after this three-year period has elapsed such a comprehensive flood control plan has not been completed and adopted, grants for flood control maintenance projects shall not be made to the county or municipal corporations in the county until a comprehensive flood control plan is completed and adopted by the appropriate local Additions in text are indicated by underline; deletions by stpikeewts 5 Ch. 46 REGULAR SESSION authority. These limitations on grants shall not preclude allocations for emergency purposes made pursuant to RCW 86.26.060. Approved March 11, 1986. Effective June 11, 1986, 90 days after date of adjournment. WINTER RECREATION -PARKING PERMIT FEES - TERMS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS CHAPTER 47 HOUSE BILL NO. 1563 AN ACT Relating to winter recreational facilities; and amending RCW 43.51.300 and 43.51.340. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON: Sec. I. Section 2, chapter 209, Laws of 1975 1st ex. sess. as amended by section 2, chapter 11, Laws of 1982 and RCW 43.51.300 are each amended to read as follows: The fee for the issuance of the special winter recreational area parking permit for each winter season commencing on October 1st of each year shall be determined by the commission after consultation with the winter recreation advisory committee(( PR6VfBEBT-SE)WEVERT ?hnt-ssch-Eee--nr-+ot-exceed-ten-do��ere-ennnel:y)). If the person makinc application therefor is also the owner of a snowmobile registered pursuant to chapter 46.10 RCW, there shall be no fee for the issuance of the permit. All special winter recreational area parking permits shall expire on the last day of September following the issuance of such permit. Sec. 2. Section 8, chapter 209, Laws of 1975 1st ex. less. as amended by section 6, chapter 11, Laws of 1982 and RCW 43.51,340 are each amended to read as follows: (1) There is created a winter recreation advisory committee to advise the parks and recreation commission in the administration of Additions in text are indicated by underline; deletions by ssFihwJ" 6 this chapter and tc development of winter (2) The committee (a) Six represent public appointed by the six geographical recreation activity o (b) Three repress the commission. (c) One represent one representative of the Washington sty be appointed by tl association. (3) The terms of and (b) of this sect of appointment and appointed, except in the remainder of these members shall shall be appointed f two years, and three (4) Members of and (b) of this recreational progran expenses as provic hereafter amended. (5) The committf not less than tw: committee chairman chairman of the coi Additions in t OF R� 0.9A � 09gT�4 SEP'1"0'6 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR November 16, 1984 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Mr. Don LaBelle, Director King County Public Works Room 900 - King County Adm. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Attention: H.B. 1531 Dear Mr. LaBelle: The City of Renton would like to apply through the County for three projects to be funded by the State Department of Ecology Flood Control Maintenance Program. We have, of course, flood control responsibility for the Cedar River, Green River and minor creeks and streams. We have picked three projects which are the most critical, have revional bene- fits and which are jointly funded by the City. 1. Lower Cedar River Dredging From Lake Washington to Logan Avenue Bridge - Estimated cost: $50,000 annually. 2. Lower Cedar River East Bank Emergency Repairs - From (sY Lake Washington to North 6th St. - Estimated cost - $50,000. 3. Cedar and Green River Automatic Floodwater Monitoring - Estimated cost: $24,000. Your consideration of these projects is appreciated. Very truly yours, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor :jft OF R'6' Z MAL O 9,a �• 09gT£O SEPI"Oe; BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR November 16, 1984 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Mr. Don LaBelle, Director King County Public Works Room 900 - King County Adm. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Attention: H.B. 1531 Dear Mr. LaBelle: The City of Renton would like to apply through the County for three projects to be funded by the State Department of Ecology Flood Control Maintenance Program. We have, of course, flood control responsibility for the Cedar River, Green River and minor creeks and streams. We have picked three projects which are the most critical, have revional bene- fits and which are jointly funded by the City. 1. Lower Cedar River Dredging - From Lake Washington to Logan Avenue Bridge - Estimated cost: $50,000 annually. 2. Lower Cedar River East Bank Emergency Repairs - From Lake Washington to North 6th St. - Estimated cost - $50,000. 3. Cedar and Green River Automatic Floodwater Monitoring - Estimated cost: $24,000. Your consideration of these projects is appreciated. Very truly yours, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Engineering Supervisor jft GRANT APPLICATION HB-1531 CITY OF RENTON LOWER CEDAR RIVER - EAST BANK EMERGENCY REPAIRS The lower Cedar River's east bank in Renton, from the mouth at Lake Washington up to North 6th St. and the Boeing Air- craft Bridge has significant river bank erosion. The City has proposed spot repairs to confine the river flow into the channel to protect the Cedar River Trail Park and the Boeing Renton Airplane Plant. Estimated Project Cost $50,000.00 50% Grant GRANT APPLICATION HB-1531 CITY OF RENTON CEDAR AND GREEN RIVERS FLOODWATER AUTOMATIC MONITORING The City of Renton, as part of the Green River Management Group, is working up a joint program to improve river level monitoring on the Green River to optimize the P-1 and P-17 Pump Station operations. The City is also upgrading our Water Telemetry in 1985 with data transmission to the City Shops adjacent to the County Shops. With our work, we would propose to provide flood monitoring level measurement on the Cedar River at the Burnett Avenue Bridge and on the Green River at the S. 180th St. Bridge and the Monster Road Bridge. Data would be outputted at the City and County Shops. These improvements would be of a benefit to the entire region. Estimated Project Cost $24,000.00 50% Grant GRANT APPLICATION HB-1531 CITY OF RENTON LOWER CEDAR RIVER DREDGING The lower Cedar River Channel in Renton must be dredged on a regular basis. The proposed portion of the Channel for work in 1985 is between the mouth at Lake Washington up to the Logan Avenue Bridge. This annual dredging preserves the channel's capacity for 100-year flood protection. Without dredging, catastrophic flooding of the Renton urban center would occur, including the Boeing -Renton Plant and Pacific Car and Foundry. Estimated Project Cost $50,000.00 50% Grant I APPLICATION I'OR PROJECT ASS ANCE FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (CII. 86.26 RCW) 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 4. PRC1JEC`T CONTACT PERSON Name Robert E. Bergstrom, P_F_ Address City Hall - 200 Mill AyP S Renton, WA 98nLs Title Engineer i ng S_�PrTisoPhone # 235-2631 5. L•SIPIMNIED PI2OIL(T COST (Dollars) Local Share 2 000State Grant 525.000 Other Total Cost $50.000 In-'ltL�NCY PRa 0 Yes O No O 2. C(XMY ENGINEER Name: Don LaBelle: King County Public Works Address: Room 900 - King County Adm. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Phone # 344-25.17 Attention: HB 1531 3. PRWECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging Project duration Annually mo/yr. Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area O Name of City or Town City of Renton 6. FLOOD FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior 100 Yrs; Present 50 Years; Future 100 Years Not Applicable O 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) 3. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND TOWNS ONLY) wJAT IS T11E STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGE�nU PLAN: Ca►ipleted C-3 Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date May, 1985 9. SIGNATURE OF AUT11ORIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVES' O.Y Q %,C1 tLI, . SQ.A- L�Pn 'Typed Name and Title Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Phone # 235-2580 Date (6 -U�' 10. STATUS OF COhIPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FOR THIS PROTECT) Completed O Preparation Underway O Anticipated Conpletion Date -MaYy- .&5 Certification by County Engineer Date (to the best of my knowledge the a5ove inFormaEioi n s corrcctT-�— REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of APPLICATION FOR PROTECT ASSI. .+NCE FL(X) CONI'ROL ASSISTANCTs AC'C(xJN'I' PROGRAM (CII. 86.26 RCW) 1. NAME: AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 4. I'Iz all-1 I' C(WI'AC1' PERSON Name Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Address City Hall - 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton. WA 98055 Title Engineering slipervignrPhone # 235=2631 1 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (Dollars) Local Share 12 000State Grant $12 000 Other Total Cost $94,onn F1M1EItC -NC'Y PRQ;_ Yes O No GD 2. COUNTY ENGINEER Name: Don LaBel le King County Piihl is Works Address: Room 900,K;ng County Adm Bldg. Seattle,WA ;181O1+ Phone # 344-2517 Attn:_ HB 1531 3. PRCLECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Cedar and Green Rivers Floodwater Automatic Monitoring (See Attachments) Project duration three mom Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area CD Name of City or Town City of Renton 6. FLOOD FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior Yrs; Present Years; Future --Years Not Applicable �^ J 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) Install three automatic flood water level monitors on Cedar River at Burnett Ave. N. Bridge and on the Green River at S. 180th St. and Monster Road Bridge. Data would be transmitted to King County Joint Ships & Emergency 3. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND TOWNS ONLY) w1AT IS T1IE STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN: CanpletcNI C3 Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date Ma.y,_1985. 9. SIGNATURE OF AU111ORIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE _ O►tk-G rtc - 0 c.4^> Typed Name and Title Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Phone # 235-2580 Date I t " t (O -84 10. STATUS OF COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FOR T1TIS PROJECT) Completed O Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date Certification by County Engineer _ __Date (to the best of my knowledge the above information -is correct7- `— REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of r APPLICATION FOR PROJECT AS:, ANCE I:I� PMNCY PR(. T Yes XO No O FU.X)D CONTROL ASSISTAN(a; ACCOJN'I' PROGRAM (CH. 86.26 RCW) 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) City of Renton Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 4. P l:ca31.0 1' CONTACT PI 160 N Nana, Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E. Address City Hall - 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton. WA 980SS Title Eng i neer i nq Supery i sorE'hone # 735-26311 5. LSTIMN1'L•'D PROJ,'C!P COST (Dollars) Local Share 2 OOOState Grant $25,000 Other Total Cost $5,000 2. COUNTY ENGINEER Name: Don LaBelle, King County Public Works Address:Room 900 - King County Adm. Bldg. Seattle, WA 98104 Phone # 344-2517 Attn: HB-1531 3. PROTECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Lower Cedar River - East Bank Emergency Repairs (See attachments) Project duration six m% Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area O Name of City or Town Citx of Rentnn 6. FLOOD FREQUENCY PR=-CTION PROVIDED BY PROTECT FACILITY Prior 100 Yrs; Present 100 Years; Future 100 Years Not Applicable 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) (See Attachments) Repair Cedar River east bank from mouth at Lake Washington upstream to Logan Ave. N. Bridge. Project protects Boeing Airplane Co. Renton Plant and City Cedar River Park. 3. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND TOWNS ONLY) ,MINI, IS TI[L.' STATUS OF APPLICANT"S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEI"IF.I�YT PLAN: Completed CD Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date - May.,.__19.85 9. SIGNATURE OF ALMIORIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE r3.o." TyExxl Name and Title Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor _ _ Phone # Date 11 - 16 - 84 10. STATUS OF COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FOR THIS PROJECT) Completed Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date May, 1985 Certification by County Engineer Date (to the best of my knowledge the`bove i.nf-oiiaon is correct�"`V REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of " - "P.TT-'T r■MOTr"' b a CITY OF RENTON ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Low" CEDAR RIVO& [Utv/r 1c M Eras &.4cY DSfIGNSR_ DATA /IL[ NO DRAWN ' CN[CIttD—. [GALt p�ao �nea swot—_ ' A"ROVSn •N[pT DI_ LAKE WASHINGTON IN ' 1 rr .1 K CM J LAKE YOU$" CITY OF RENTON ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT LOw6it C�AAR �2�v6A. CHANNEL. T,X'ZE1oe #J* Dff1ON[ OAT• /IL[ ND *CALr ORA CNLCRtD r.ao oar �A o` A-VMKW o 1N9rT cw N�- LAKE WASHINGTON i ; Mayor's Office ((_ CITY OF RENTON gate) INTER -DEPARTMENTAL ROUTING SLIP Dcvk V4om- �ivn (referr to) (referred by) Please prepare reply for the Mayor's signature on Mayor's office stationery. Please reply to the attached letter for the Mayor, showing a copy to the Mayor. Please supply me with the facts involved in the attached letter. Forwarded for your information; please return. orwarded for your information and files. Other. W lbN l)wia MILA, *Action requested no later than ate King County Executive Randy Revelle Department of Public Works Donald J. LaBelle, Director October 30, 1984 The Honorable Barbara Shinpoch Mayor, City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Flood Control Maintenance Program (House Bill 1531) Dear Mayor Shinpoch: The purpose of this letter is to alert you to the deadline for submitting project proposals related to House Bill 1531. By now you should have received two items from the State Department of Ecology: 1. A September 10, 1984, letter outlining program requirements, and 2. An information package, dated October 19, 1984, including the application form, a copy of the Session Law (RCW 86.26), and Chapter 173-144 WAC. These items establish the County Public Works Director as coordinator for all County proposed projects and November 30, 1984 as the deadline for their submittal to DOE. In order to meet this eligibility date, I must receive all project proposals by November 14, 1984. Your proposal package must include all the items described in the WAC Rules, including your suggestion for project priorities if you have submitted more than one project. Chapter 173-144 WAC also requires the County Public Works Director to establish a County -wide priority for projects. I will put together a project review committee consisting of County staff and community Public Works Directors or application representatives to suggest overall project priorities. Address submittals to: Donald J. LaBelle, Director King County Department of Public Works Room 900 King County Administration Building Seattle, WA 98104 Attention: H.B. 1531 900 King County Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344.2517 Mayor Barbara Shinpoch October 30, 1984 Page Two If you have questions regarding the program, the application process, or project requirements, please call Bill Burns at (206)344-2585. DJL/WB:mw Sincerely, 1409vz�-14 . DONALD J. LaBELLE Director �a6 srArg 0 f JOHN SPELLMAN w� F 0 Governor '�� 1999 aVY STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-T 1 • Olympia, Washington 98504 e (206) October 19, 1984 Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch Mayor, City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mayor Shinpoch: DONALD W. MOOS Director CEIVE-C Wi, T 2.9 1984 i r The enclosed information regarding the Flood Control Maintenance program is intended to supplement that which was sent to you on September 10, 1984. This program will provide funding from the Flood Control Assistance Account (FCAA) for local maintenance projects. The account was established by Substitute House Bill 1531, which has been incorporated into Chapter 86.26 RCW, State Participation in Flood Control Maintenance. The enclosed information includes the following: Chapter 86.26 RCW (as revised by SHB 1531) Chapter 173-144 WAC, the emergency rules regarding the administra- tion of the Flood Control Assistance Account Program (FCAAP) A suggested application form for project assistance. Applications for project assistance must be processed through the county engineer of the county within which an application is made. Those appli- cations must be received by your county engineer in adequate time that he can submit it to the Department of Ecology by November 16'5d1984. The department must then submit the prioritized project list for legislative consideration by December 14, 1984. Once approved by the Legislature, funding for the approved projects will be available on July 1, 1985. If you have questions about of an application, please contact Ed Hammersmith of 459-6320. DRM:sc Enclosures (3) the program or need help with the preparation contact your county engineer. You can also my staff at (206) 459-6288 or myself at (206) Sincerely, D. Rodney Mack Supervisor Shorelands Division Chapter 173-144 WAC ADMINISTRATION OF THE FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM NEW SECTION WAC 173-144-010 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE. Chapter 212, Laws of 1984, Regular Session, amended Chapter 86.26 RCW, State Participation in Flood Control Maintenance (the Act); RCW 86.26.010 provides that the Department of Ecology (WDOE) shall administer and enforce the Flood Control Assist- ance Account program (FCAAP) established by the Act. This chapter describes the manner in which WDOE will implement the provisions of the Act. »M� Pi"nTTn►t WAC 173-144-020 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR FCAAP FUNDS. The following criteria will be used for approval by WDOE of a maintenance project appli- cation for flood control assistance funds. (1) Eligible Municipal Corporations. Municipal corporations which are eligible to receive FCAAP grant funds include but are not limited to counties, cities, towns, conservation districts, and special districts which have flood control responsibilities. (2) Public Benefit. It shall be clearly demonstrated that the projects shall display a general public and state interest as differenti- ated from a private interest and they shall bring about public benefits commensurate with the FCAAP funds provided. (3) Permit Requirements. Prior to construction, the project must meet all applicable local, state, and federal regulation and permit requirements. (4) Comprehensive Flood Control Management Plan. The county or municipal corporation in which the project is located must either have a comprehensive flood control management plan completed and adopted or in preparation by the appropriate local authority and to be completed and adopted within three years of the date of certification by the county engineer that a comprehensive flood control management plan is being pre- pared. The project shall be consistent with and conform to the compre- hensive flood control management plan. (5) Project Cost. The project grant application shall include the estimated project cost. (6) Project Benefits. The project benefits shall be clearly identi- fied and described. (7) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Requirements. The unincorporated county or incorporated city or town in which the project is located shall be participating in the NFIP and shall be meeting the NFIP regulation requirements. (8) Legislative Approval. Nonemergency projects shall not be funded from the FCAAP without approval by the Legislature. (9) Budget Report. Any municipal corporation seeking FCAAP funds shall submit its annual budget for flood control purposes to the county :W_a engineer within 30 days after final adoption. The budget reports for municipal corporations and for the county shall be submitted to WDOE by the county engineer not later than March 1 of every year. (10) Eligible Project Costs. Only that work which is conducted during project construction shall be eligible for payment from FCAAP funds. WAC 173-144-030 DEFINITIONS. Following are the FCAAP definitions of words and phrases: (1) "Emergency Funds." That portion of the four million dollar biennial appropriation set aside to perform emergency work. (2) "Emergency Work." Work which must be done immediately to pro- tect life and property when an imminent flood threat exists or immediately after a flooding situation to prevent further losses. (3) "Maintenance Work." The work necessary to keep in good condi- tion, repair and preservation of the natural condition or man-made flood control facilities which are subject to damage or destruction from flood- ing by action of erosion, by stream flow, by sheet runoff, or other damage by the sea or other bodies of water. (4) "Restoring." The work necessary to bring an existing condition or man-made facility or other works back to its former or natural condi- tion by repairing, rebuilding, or altering. -3- I - ♦ I l^T Alt WAC 173-144-040 FCAAP PROJECT APPLICATION AND APPROVAL PROCESS. The project application and approval process for the municipal corpora- tion application shall include the following in the general sequence given. (1) The applicant shall prepare the project application to comply with the provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and this chapter. The applica- tion shall be made on a form furnished by WDOE. In addition to the com- pleted form, the application shall include the following: (a) A detailed written description of the project; (b) A vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile, section -township -range, etc.; (c) A general plan drawing of the project on an 8'" x 11" or 81" x 14" sheet; and (d) A description of the project benefits which describe how the project will mitigate flood damage and describe development which exists on adjacent and nearby lands which are protected by the facility. (2) The applicant and county engineer shall review the preliminary project plans with the Washington departments of Fisheries and Game. (3) The applicant shall indicate the priority of the project appli- cations if more than one is submitted. (4) The applicant shall submit a prioritized list of project applications to the county engineer. (5) The county engineer shall certify the status of the comprehen- sive flood control management plan and shall submit a prioritized list of all project applications within the county to WDOE. -4- (6) WDOE will analyze all projects for compliance with the require- ments pursuant to this chapter and Chapter 86.26 RCW and give priority to projects based on the criteria defined in WAC 173-144-050. (7) WDOE submits the list of projects to the Legislature for approval. (8) The applicant and/or county shall acquire the necessary federal, state, and local permits along with any other permission required to com- plete the project. (9) WDOE shall consult with the departments of Fisheries and Game regarding the list of projects. (10) WDOE shall prepare and finalize the cooperative agreements with the counties. (11) The construction plans and specifications shall be prepared by the applicant for approval by the county engineer prior to submission to WDOE for review of each project for compliance with all requirements. (12) The county engineer shall supervise and direct each project. (13) WDOE shall monitor each project for compliance with the provi- sions of the cooperative agreement. vrw crrTTnN WAC 173-144-050 PRIORITY OF NONEMERGENCY FCAAP PROJECTS. The priority given to nonemergency projects by k'DOE, the counties, and other municipal corporations shall involve consideration to the following cri- teria: (1) The public benefits from the project shall be commensurate with the amount of FCAAP funds granted for the project. - 5- (2) An evaluation of the findings that the county, city, or town in which the project is located is engaging in appropriate floodplain manage- ment activities in the one -hundred -year flood plan. (3) An evaluation of the status and adequacy of the comprehensive flood control management plan for the project basin, county or munici- pality. (4) The priority given to the projects by WDOE shall consider the priority which has already been established by each county. (5) An evaluation of the magnitude of potential public damage that might occur without the project. (6) An evaluation of the project urgency. v.rtr CrrTTnW7 WAC 173-144-060 FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANT ACCOUNT CONTRIBUTION AND MATCH REQUIREMENTS FOR NONEMERGENCY PROJECTS. The following criteria shall be used regarding the FCAAP funding for all nonemergency projects: (1) The maximum contribution from the Flood Control Assistance Account toward the cost of any project shall be $500,000 per project. (2) The amount of FCAAP contribution for any nonemergency project shall not exceed 50 percent of the total project cost. (3) The total FCAAP contribution for all projects in any county shall not exceed $500,000 per biennium. e%� .trt• P�t^/�TTA17 WAC 173-144-070 EMERGENCY PROJECT FUND ADMINISTRATION. The follow- ing criteria shall be the basis of allocating the emergency fund monies: (1) Appropriation from the FCAAP fund for emergency projects will require the declaration of an emergency by the county commission or the county executive. (2) Application for emergency funds must be made on the same form used for nonemergency fund application. (3) Payment of FCAAP funds for the emergency project will be based on actual project costs. (4) Payment of money from the emergency fund shall be allocated on a first come --first serve basis and shall not be based on any priority system. (5) Emergency project grants shall not require legislative approval but shall be approved by the Director of the Department of Ecology. (6) The maximum amount of money allocated to the emergency project fund shall be $500,000 per biennium and will be so identified with the list of projects submitted to the Legislature for appropriation. (7) The flood control assistance account contribution shall not exceed 80 percent of the eligible project cost. mm NEW SECTION 0 WAC 173-144-080 MULTI -YEAR PROJECTS. Legislative approval will only be required once for a project which continues more than one year, but funding after the first year is subject to further FCAAP appropriation by the Legislature. wri.i cprTTnN WAC 173-144-090 WORK STANDARDS FOR ALL FCAAP PROJECTS. All work which is funded from the flood control assistance account shall conform to the standards and specifications of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service or the county engineer. QM btate Participation, Maintenance 86.26,060 RCW 86.15.110, been found to be of benefit to a zone or participating zones. The bonds may not exceed an amount, together with any outstanding general obliga- tion indebtedness, equal to three -fourths of one percent .of the value of taxable property within the zone or par- ticipating zones, as the term 'value of the taxable prop- erty" is defined in RCW 39.36.015. The bonds shall be issued and sold in accordance with chapter 39.46 RCW. [1984 c 186 § 62. Prior: 1983 c 315 § 21; 1983 c 167 § 211; 1961 c 153 § 17.] Purpose-1984 a 186: See note following RCW 39.46.110, Severability-1983 c 315: Sec note following RCW 90.03.500. liberal construction—�,everability-1983 c 167. Sec RCW 39- .46.010 and note following. Chapter 86.16 FLOOD CONTROL ZONES BY STATE Sections 86.16.095 Repealed. 86.16.095 Repealed. See Supplementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections, this volume. Chapter 86.26 STATE PARTICIPATION IN FLOOD CONTROL MAINTENANCE Sections 86.26.007 Flood control assistance account—Fstablishmem— Use. 86'6.010 Administration and enforcement. 86.26.020 Repealed. 86.26.030 Repealed. 86.26.040 Dutics of local engineer —Approval of plans, etc., by department of ecology. 86.26,050 Projects in which state will participate —Allocation of funds. 86.26.060 Allocation of funds- 86.26.080 Annual budget reports of municipal corporations — Allocation of funds. 86.26.090 ` Scope of maintenance in which state will participate. 86.26.100 Agreement as to participation —Limit on amount. 86.26.105 Comprehensive flood control management plan —Re- quirements —Time for completion. 86.26.110 Repealed. 86.26.007 Flood control assistance account —Es- tablishment —Use. The flood control assistance ac- count is hereby established in the general fund. At the beginning of each biennium after June 30, 1985, the state treasurer shall transfer from the general fund to the flood control assistance account an amount of money which, when combined with money remaining in the ac- count from the previous biennium, will equal four mil- lion dollars. Moneys in the flood control assistance account may be spent only after appropriation for a specified list of projects under this chapter. [1984 c 212 § 1.) 86.26.010 Administration and enforcement. The de- partment of ecology shall have charge for the state of the administration and enforcement of all laws relating to flood control. [1984 c 212 § 2; 1951 c 240 § 3.) 86-26.020 Repealed. See Supplementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections, this volume. 86.26.030 Repealed. See Supplementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections, this volume. 86.26.040 Duties of local engineer Approval of plans, etc., by department of ecology. Whenever state grants under this chapter arc used in a flood control maintenance project, the engineer of the county within which the project is located shall approve all plans for the project and shall supervise the work. The approval of such plans, construction and expenditures by the depart- ment of ecology, in consultation with the department of fisheries and the department of game, shall be a condi. tion precedent to slate participation in the cost of any project. [1984 c 212 § 3; 1951 e 240 § 6.] 86.26.050 Projects in ►which state will partici- pate —Allocation of funds. State participation shall be in such flood control maintenance projects as are af- fected with a general public and state interest, as differ- entiated from a private interest, and as are likely to bring about public benefits commensurate with the amount of state funds allocated thereto. No participa- tion may occur with a county or other municipal corpo- ration unless the director of ecology makes a finding that the county, city, or town having planning jurisdic- tion over the area where the flood control maintenance project will be engages in flood plain management activ- ities, on the one hundred year flood plain surrounding such area, that arc adequate to protect or preclude flood damage to structures, works, and improvements that may be built within its planning jurisdiction on such flood plain after the request for state participation has been made, including restriction of land uses within a river's meander belt or floodway to only flood=-_ompati- ble uses. No participation may occur with a county or other municipal corporation unless the county engineer of the county within which the flood control mainte- nance project is located certifies that a comprehensive flood control management plan has been completed and adopted by the appropriate local authority, or is being prepared for all portions of the river basin or other area, within which the project is located in that county, that are subject to flooding with a frequency of one hundred years or less. Such participation shall be made from grants made by the department of ecology from the flood control assistance account. [1984 c 212 § 4; 1951 c 240 § 7.) 86.26.060 Allocation of funds. Grants for flood con. trol maintenance shall be so employed that as far as possible, funds will be on hand to meet unusual, unfore- seeable and emergent flood conditions. Allocations by the department of ecology, for emergency purposes, shall in each instance be in amounts which together with 11984 RCW Sapp —pa .e 751) 86.26.060 Title 86 RCw': Flood Control funds provided by local authority, if any, under reason- able exercise of its emergency powers, shall be adequate for the preservation of life and property, and with due regard to similar needs elsewhere in the state. [1984 e 212 § 5; 1951 c 240 § 8.) 86.26.080 Annual budget reports of municipal cor- porations Allocation of funds. Any municipal corpo- ration intending to seek state participating funds shall, within thirty days after final adoption of its annual budget for flood control purposes, report the amount thereof, to the engineer of the county within whose boundaries the municipal corporation lies. The county engineer shall submit such reports, together with reports from the county itself, to the department of ecology. On the basis of all such budget reports received, the depart- ment may thereupon prepare a tentative and preliminary plan for the orderly and most beneficial allocation of funds from the flood control assistance account for the ensuing calendar year. Soil conservation districts shall be exempted from the provisions of this section. [1984 e 212 § 6; 1951 c 240 § 10.] 86.26.090 Scope of maintenance in which state will participate. The state shall participate with eligible local authorities in maintaining and restoring the normal and reasonably stable river and stream channel alignment and the normal and reasonably stable river and stream channel capacity for carrying off flood waters with a minimum of damage from bank erosion or overflow of adjacent lands and property; and in restoring, maintain- ing and repairing natural conditions, works and struc- tures for the maintenance of such conditions. The state shall likewise participate in the restoration and mainte- nance of natural conditions, works or structures for the protection of lands and other property from inundation or other damage by the sea or other bodies of water. Funds from the flood control assistance account shall not be available for maintenance.of works or structures maintained solely for the detention or storage of flood waters. [1984 c-212 § 7; 1951 e 240 § 11.) 96.26.100 Agreement as to participation —Limit on amount. St2te participation in the cost of any flood control maintenance project shall be provided for by a written memorandum agreement between the director of ecology and the legislative authority of the county sub- mitting the request, which agreement, among other things, shall state the estimated cost and the percentage thereof to be borne by the state. In no instance, except on emergency projects, shall the state's share exceed one-half the cost of the project. [1984 c 212 § 8; 1951 c 240 § 12.1 86.26.105 Comprehensive flood control management plan —Requirements ----Time for completion. A com- prehensive flood control management plan shall deter- mine the need for flood control work, consider alternatives to in -stream flood control work, identify and consider potential impacts of in --stream flood control work on the state's in -stream resources, and identify the river's meander bclt'or floodway. A comprehensive flood control management plan shall be completed and adopted within at least three years of the certification that it is being prepared, as provided in RCW 86.26,050. If after this three-year period has elapsed such a plan has not been completed and adopted, grants for flood control maintenance shall not be made until a plan is completed and adopted by the appropriate local author- ity. These limitations on grants shall not preclude allo- cations for emergency purposes made pursuant to RCW 86.26.060. [1984 c 212 § 9.1 86.26.110 Repealed. See Supplementary Table of Disposition of Former RCW Sections, this volume. Title 87 IRRIGATION Chapters 87.03 Irrigation districts generally. Chapter 87.03 IRRIGATION DISTRICTS GENERALLY Sections 87.03.016 District may provide street lighting —Limitations. 87.03.018 Creation of legal authority to carry out powers — Method —Indebtedness. 87.03.085 Post --organization district elections —Election boards Notice. 87.03.435 Construction work —Bonds —Notice —Bids — Contracts. 87.03.460 Compensation and expenses of directors, officer, employees. 87.03.910 Lump sum payment to district for irrigable lands ac- quired for highway purposes. 87.03.815 Lump sum payment to district for irrigable lands ac- quired for highway purposes —Order relieving fur- ther district assessments. 87.03.016 District may provide street lighting - Limit2tions. In addition to other powers conferred by law, an irrigation district is authorized to construct, purchase, lease, or otherwise acquire, maintain, and op- erate a system for lighting public streets and highways and to enter into a contract or contracts with electric utilities, either public or private, to provide that service. However, no contract entered into by the board for pro- viding street lighting for a period exceeding ten years is binding upon the district unless ratified by a majority vote of the electors of the district at an election called, held, and canvassed for that purpose in the same manner as provided by law for district bond elections. The authority granted by this section applies only to an irrigation district that has begun the construction, purchase, lease, or acquisition of a street lighting system by January 1, 1984, or has entered into a contract for that service by that date. 11984 c 168 § 1.1 11994 RCS' Supp--page 7521 APPLICATION FOR PROTECT ASSISTANCE FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (CH. 86.26 RCW) 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) 4. PROTECT CONTACT PERSON Name Address Title Phone # 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (Dollars) Local Share Other State Grant Total Cost EMEIK,ENCY PROTECT Yes O No O 2. COUNTY ENGINEER Name: Address: Phone # 3. PROTECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Project duration mo/yr. Unincorporated Area Incorporated Area C9 Name of City or Town 6. FLOOD FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior Yrs; Present Years; Future Years Not Applicable = 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) 3. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND TOWNS ONLY) WHAT IS THE STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANA PLAN? Ccenpleted CD Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date 9. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE Typed Name and Title Date Phone # 10. STATUS OF COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FOR THIS PROJECT) Completed O Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date _^ T Certification by County Engineer Date (to the best of my knowledge theabove lmmnorma. is correct)--� REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of APPLICATION FOR PROTECT ASS1S7'ANCE FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCO UN'1' PROGRAM (CII. 80.26 RCW) 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) 4. C'(WI'AC"1' 11I-:IiSON Name Address Title Phone # 5. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (Dollars) Local Share State Grant Other Total Cost 1-:ME:In:'NCY PROTEC r Yes O No O 2. COUNTY EMINEER Name: Address: Phone # 3. PROJECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Project duration mo/yr. Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area O Name of City or Town 6. FLOOD FREQUENCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior Yrs; Present Years; Future Years Not Applicable 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) 3. (FOI2 USE BY C'ITIL:S AND TOWNS ONLY) MIAT IS T11E STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMF.r PLAN: C:anpleted CD Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date _ 9. SIGNATURE OF AU7.11ORIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE `1'ypoKi Name and Title Date Phone # 10. STATUS OF COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FOR THIS PROJECT) Completed O Preparation Underway O Anticipated Completion Date _ T Certification by County Engineer Date (to the best of my knowledge the above 1nfornia_ion_-is corr�T ---` REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of APPLICATION ITT PH(UI:C I' ASSTS.. *'F' 1-7viE1.'(:I•:NC'Y PROTb— Yes O No 1.14A l) C(1MIVOL ASSISTANCI AC:C(XJN'I' I'RO(:ItM1 W11. 80.26 R('W) 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) Cd Gvo 9�):s,55' 4. C(WI'ACT 11I :RSON Nano �b Address Title Phone 5. ESTIMA`ED PROJECT COST (Dollars) Local Share Z-5 cicv-, State Grant 2S, 00 d Other Total Cost -S0j3C5y 2. COUNT' ETIGINEER y Name: I31) t , &1/c / nf$ Ca V- Address: Po,*W Qy� �'a fi,Q,�,'^ a �'c/'t1 �� ,tlq 4'2/0� Phone # 7 At�,,. ;,f1�3 /53 / 3. P10JBCT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and yk.meral plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) • nee w� Project duration AWL'A mo/yr. Unincorporated Area Incorporated Area Name of City or Town ct4:1 1� Q441C31-i 6. FLOOD FREQUI-�NCY PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROTECT FACILITY Prior/pn Yrs; Present Yo Years; Future /00 Years Not Applicable 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) 3. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND TOWNS ONLY) WWI' IS Tiff.-: S'I'NWS OF APPLICANT'S COMPRO IENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGI34ENT PIRJ? C.Ai4-)1eLL\1 C-3 Preparation Underway ® Anticipated Completion Date NPe_S__ 9. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE lyp��3 Name and Title Phone # Date 10. STATUS OF COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PLAN (FOR THIS PROJECT) Completed O Preparation Underway ®Anticipated Canpletion Date �g85 Certification by County Engineer Date (to this best of my knowledge th aUove inFoririafiori'i"s correctT-`—--___._.�__—�_ REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of APPLICATION FOR PROJEOV ASST. ICE 1.9;:ItGENCY PROJi Yes No O 11•41 N) ('(W1'R0L ASSISTANCE AC('O LJNI' PRX.10M (('l l . 86.26 1XIM 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and location address) 011(f P"'j �r 4. 1'1tOi1Lr1' C(W111'AC'r PE:ILSON NaiiLe �O Fet4 _ Address CI,�� 2bo /A// Ar So wo, 96aS5 TiLlo ,S'1/-V,vvlsj✓ Phone # Z35-Z6 5. ESTIMATED PROTECT CO0.ST (Dollars) Local Share ZS,BOb State Grant 2 p Other Total Cost 5(),566 2. C(XWI Y ENGINEER Name: D)IJ LG f � - rr`., 01) Nw Address: J2srl Ca, AJ ! ' - �J-. 9gloq Phone # 3y 4l -25 A�kAo� �- , Al -/53 3. PROJECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, r.uige, etc.) �/ltGvt�pyt� l�0oiQ S Sc c d#— 44.ti/`l Project duration Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area O Name of City or Town (214„t 6. FLOOD FREQUU4C.'Y PROTECTION PROVIDED BY PROJECT FACILITY Prior I (90 Yrs; Present /fxj Years; Future /clo Years Not Applicable 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) a aJli - ,Pvw F"( ba�c -� rnM ok Lam () �$ �'� r Is 4fce"M � Q•.��r Qww (��k 3. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND TOWNS ONLY) bdlIN1' IS 'TIIE: STATUS OF APPLICANT'S C'OMPREIIENSIVE FII)OD CONTROL MANAGEMENT PI.XJ? Caiipletet1c-D Preparation Underway Anticipated Canpletion Date /V) i 9 5 9. SIGNATURE OF AU7110RIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE 7' gxxl Name and Title Phone # Z3E-24-10 �r.hw•� , ,,yp,r - M a 1, cr �, y.� Date 10. STATUS OF COMPREIENSIVF. FLOOD CONI'ROL MANAGFMN'I' PLAN (FOR THIS PROTECT) Completed O Preparation Underway OAnticipated Ccmpletion Date /'ria lqq5 Certification by County Engineer Date (to the best of my knowledge th&- above infoni—z&idri -is REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of APPLICATION FOR PROJECT ASSi._-.ONCE I�WIaC',I:NCY PRO).__ Yes O No Q FlLX)1) L'(WI'ROL ASSI!TI'ANCI. ACCOIJN'I' I'lt(Xat/1M (0I. 86.26 R('W) 1. NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT (County or Municipal corporation with mailing and & location address) Zoe ✓ ld AA S. "A,,J Gv 4 9 9 a 55 4. I'I:Ca71 C`I' C(WPW1' P11,10_ON Name i�L r Address dlywllf 746 /I d/ 4 5V Title EN .1 5�,0WV18dV Phone #Z S. I:S'I'IMA'I'E:D PROJE--r COST (Dollars) Local Share /2/ocx3 State Grant / Z.�ov J Other Total Cost 2 y, do(z 2. COUNTY ENGINEERD NEune : A< 2 t 4 �xl �+ �v P(Q Address: %zm.�,314y fe6f 4 clleIO 4 Phone # 3 y y- ZS /% 3. PROTECT TITLE, DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION (Attach vicinity map and sketch to identify water body name, stream river mile and general plan map; Section, township, range, etc.) Ced4/ 1� G OCC.IJ R, V'"' �1oa�w��✓ ( S& JM r- JA,Mo'V1S Project duration _� -&yr. Unincorporated Area O Incorporated Area D Name of City or Town 6. PL" FR ,UE N(_-Y PRO'IECI'ION PROVIDED BY PROTECT FACILITY Prior _ Yrs; Present Years; Future Years Not Applicable 7. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT BENEFITS - Describe the development which exists on lands protected by project facility and how this project will mitigate flood damages. (Attach detailed description if necessary) I S GI.R,"I c- Sle_K4 S404 ti 1r¢, �� P,J1/,� ��w it Mc�861"57- d- MCAV5dw 0?10- i (3114 l3r�:�� c<K� //r+'}I-e G',rt�..� � Sum/4 � �rc. I sN•�fk 3. (FOR USE BY CITIES AND TOWNS ONLY) MIAT IS TIIG STATUS OF APPLICANT'S COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGF4ENP PIAN? Completed cD Preparation Underway Anticipated Completion Date M?_1J Q 9. S.ICNATURL OF AUTHORIZED APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE Typed Nana. and Title —� Phone # 2'35'- 3 Date V J 10. STATUS OF COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD CONTROL MANAGI:MI N'(' PLAN (FOR THIS PROJECT) Completed O Preparation Underway Anticipated Completion Date 16, �! `__:0 . Certification by County Engineer (to tho L>Lst of my ktiowludge tliu above: infcirniaticin -is cor'rectT Date -- - -- - -- -- REVISED 10-24-84 County Priority Rating of i 4,,i i✓ r, , .. .,I•> 1 HIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of 1986, by and between King County. Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation duly authorized and existing by virtue of the laws of the Stato of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City." WITNESSE TH WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement each have power to perform the terms and conditions of this agreement, and WI IERE AS, tho King County Council has by Resolution No. _ passed on 1986, authorized the King County Executive to enter into an agreement with the City of Renton for the purpose of improvement of Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging Project in accordance with the Flood Control Assistance Account Program (FCAAP) RCW Ch. 86.26 and WAC 1 13-145. WHEREAS, City of Renton has by appropriate legislative action authorized this agreement, and WHEREAS, it is the interest of the public served by both jurisdictions that said improvement be constructed. NOW, 1 I iEflf_F ORE, 111S COVENANI E_D AND AGREED AS F OLLOWS: I . Purpose. I he purpose of this contract agreement shall be to improve the Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging Project which is eligible for grant funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology (F CAAP) Program. 2. Work. The County and the City agree to perform the above -referenced project according to the terms and conditions of Exhibit No. I. 1N WI I NE SS WI IERE OF , the parties hereto have hereunto set their hand and seals the day and year first above written. KING COUNTY, WASHINGI ON King County Executive Signed this day of 1986 APPROVED AS TU FORM CI1Y OF RENTON, STAIE OF WASHING TON Mayor Signed this day of APPROVED AS 10 FURM AND LEGALITY Ueputy prosecuting Attorney City Attorney AT1ESI., Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk - 2 - EXHIBIT NO. I Work Elements 1. Lower Cedar River Dredging a. River dredging and bank stabilization. b. Remove spoils and debris and haul to upland spoils sites. C. Construction survey. soundings and as-builts. d. Miscellaneous fisheries habitat improvements and wildlife plantings. e. Associated dredging and river bar removal and associated appurtenances. Agency Responsibility II. a. The City of Renton will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents, obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to King County for technical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval, award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management, prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all project documentation as regarded by law and by the Department of Ecology Grant Agreement. b. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency. The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition, construction, construction management and any additional work required to furnish a complete project. 1 he County shall be responsible for project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure all work is done according to plans and specifications, final project inspection with the City and the Department, and submitting a final inspection report to the Department within 30 days of inspection. C. 1 he City hereby agrees to obtain any permits required for the project d. King County, as signator with the State Department of Ecology on the grant agreement, and the City as the lead agency for design construction. construction management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the State Department of Ecology Grant Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn present to the State Department of Ecology for reimbursement to the City. e. Payment of Grant Funds to City 1. Payment for major project elements described in Section I will be disallowed when the City's actual costs exceed that element's estimated total eligible cost by more than ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County. lyre County will not provide reimbursement in excess of the County's share of the total eligible project cost. the County's share shall not exceed fifty (')0) pnrco[A of the total eligible projecL cost of $50.000 in cash, including Washington State Sales lax. where applicable. 2. Requests for payrnenl of eligible funds will be submitted by the City on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher shell be submitted to the County along with information which documents the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of the project. lire voucher request form and supportive documents must itemi/e all allowable costs by major elements as described in Section 1. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit 11. Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to: King County Department of Public Works Surface Water Management Facilities Maintenance 155 Monroe Avenue N.E . Renton, WA 98056 ALtn: Jerry Crook, Manager 3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more often than monthly on a reimbursable basis. 4. All payments are conditioned upon submission► to the County of the above -mentioned iternized state voucher request form, certified by the City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services performed within the affective dates of this agreement unless a written modification is obtained. 5. the County shall reimburse the City for• fifty (50) percent of the total eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit I except for the amount withhold as security for City's performance as specified in Section E6. 6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be withheld by the County as security for City's performance. Monies withheld by the County as security under the provisions of this paragraph will he paid to tho City when the project(s) described in Section I have been completed, or portions thereof approved according to this agreement. 7. When voucher requests are approved by the County. payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee. B. 1 he City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty (30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in Section 1. 9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be refunded to the County by the City. -2- f. Indemnification 1. The County shall in no way be held responsible; for payment of salaries, consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project described herein, except as provided in Section I. 2. To the exLer►t the Constitution arid laws of the State of Washington permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any claim of liability arising ouL of the project described in this agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained. g. Termination 1. For -Cause: The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this agreement, the County may refuse to pay any fur thor funds thereunder and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination. n notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior Lo the effective date: of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data studies, survoys, drawings, maps, model,,;, photographs, and reports or other rnaLnrials prepared by the (Aty under this agreement, at the option of the County, shall become its properly, arid the City shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials. h. Effective Date and 1 ime for Performance 1 he effective date of this grant agreement shall be July 1, 1986. Any work porfort-nod prior to the effective date of this agreement will be at the sole expense and risk of the City. 1 his agrnemont shall terminate on June 30, 1987. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law. No contract shall he awarded until approved in writinq by the County. 1 ho City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for inspection and use by the County. - 3 - APPENDIX A PROJECT DESCRIPTION MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (Applicant) City of Renton GRANTEE Name: King County Project Title: Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging Project Project Description: This project consists of Dredging the Cedar River Channel from Lake Wash- ington to the Logan Street Bridge. The annual dredging preserves the channel's capacity for 100-year flood events. Project Completion Date: October 31- 1986 Estimated Costs for Eligible Work Items Work Item Unit Quantit_y Unit Cost Cost Dredge river and cu.yd. 25,000 $5.00 $125,000 haul to waste site * Eligible Cost $50,000 $25,000 DOE Grant at 50% Total $125,000 ,t-2 Rent( I Cedar River Dredging APPENNX A BUDGET INFORMATION MAJOR PROJECT ELERENNTS Estimated Elieible Cost 1. Work Items 2. Inspection fee 3. Equipment rental 4. Miscellaneous TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST $45,000 5,000 $50 ,000 A-3 The Honorable Barbara City of Renton City Hall 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 u King County Executive Randy Revelle Department of hulilic Works Donald J. LaBelle, Director September 10, 1985 Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Re: Flood Control Assistance Account Program Dear Mayor Shinpoch: - 0 1985 t /C Congratulations! Your "Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging and Lower Cedar River East Bank Emergency Repairs Projects" have been selected as eligible for Flood Control Assistance Program (FCAAP) Funds. The maximum project grant is the amount identified as State Grant (Estimated Project Costs) on your application. In accordance with Chapter 173-145 WAC, the Department of Ecology staff are in the process of preparing "written agreements," but have indicated actual work can start prior to final execution of the agreements because the effec- tive date of the agreements will be July 1, 1985. Project costs incurred after July 1, 1985 and prior to final execution of the agreements will be eligible for FCAAP funds. Chapter 173-145 WAC requires all work funded by FCAAP to conform to the standards and specifications of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service or the County engineer. In addition, the County engineer shall provide inspection to assure all project work is conducted and completed to the construction plans and speci- fications. When your project is completed, a final detailed inspection shall be made by the County engineer along with representatives from Department of Ecology (WDOE). Results of the final inspection shall be displayed in a written report and, when appropriate, on "as -built" Lunstruction plans. These shall be submitted to WDOE within thirty days after the final project inspection. Please notify Jerry Creek, Manager, Facilities Maintenance Section, Surface Water Management Division, 155 Monroe Avenue Northeast, Renton, Washington 98056, in writing, at least three days prior to beginning your project so he can arrange the required inspection. 9(x) King County Administration Building 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344.2517 The Honorable Barbara Y. Shinpoch September 10, 1985 Page two If you have any questions, please contact Jerry Creek at 255-2531. Yours truly, OlffdoJe/L e le Director DJL:JC:de cc: Randy Revelle, King County Executive Joseph J. Simmler, (Manager, Surface Water Hanagement (SWN) Division A_T_T_N_: Bill Burns, Administrative Assistant Jerry Creek, Manager, SWM Facilities Maintenance Section NA U TICA B Y THE LAKE -, t I 1 3 I 0) ' I LL' � Y ...j a �I o LOT 1 I" = 4 0 ' 040 80' RENTON SP AFO 8612029001 COMMON ELEMENT. LOT 2 \ FNO; , • �jN� -LCE' - LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT. KIEWIT CONSTRUCTION GROUP I T y _ Q M MAY CREEK ASSOC. o o to o � \� 4 14 \ N00 + N `~ `f' N N ° N 00° 56 " 1 8 - E 586.42 ' \ . I .. - , -.------------------------------- ---� - - 10 ER E S M NT No. 18 - 15- SEWER EASEMENT - - - I S 18 N 10 W T E E N A4\. -------------------------CE 0 ----0 - - E ?8 Fp \ 1 o- - ---- ---\-- ------ -- - S ° N. END WOODN 0 2 WEST 5 3 2 ---- - 5 - _ - - \ �, �B 4y , , �. RU4p I POOL E CO n 0 41.7' a' - 1 5 3 5 LAWN G h �` S F EE NOTE q _ 3 a 5 4zrn 6.2 6.4 CE a 6.q "' �R\J� � l rev 51GN M 1 1 . 4 BLDG A :w BLDG^ q 9 - `n \ PI CONC . WALL I 0 2 I2 I I I 5 �; r �; o /6 ° o' D ' 12 ' B 41 9 6' S` 51 .9' S REC , v o; ?.3 o LDG N o 6 s I BLDG . = 51 C 1j4 I � "__ / � � DETENTION m � � � --- II I � N � S `� v POND z ,� g O r, o b' , [T]' 12.0� c, �I`{f 2 O 12 0 �ip`O�9 z AUK. e S �P Aw m v, 9 NOTE -A' C 0. 0I i / EXISTING ROCKERY ENCROACHES P .'. - 6 �� Z�12' INTO RIGHT OF WAY • _ `. o0 20~WATER ESM'T. v------}N------------------------------ ��-------------, . SIGN - - - \ I -- --- ^ r T T C0MP4------- 201WAtER ESM `t. d V. 9 30. 2 S I GNI - I CT0--------------- ` Q 05 CHAIN LINK FENCE FND. IR W/CAP MAIL STO �" f�a9 l I �1 ? ? m \ L - i\ c a I FND. I W/CAP S 00°56"18"W 132.10' I5025 t�}; _ I S. 4 ^� w co o 1 v 15025. rn 0.6' 'nrYYu , ,`-' �5.0' s��k\ O' �' o 44 D V r U i rr.> U1 5.4 5 I LOT 1 L_ - -- 3 - 5-3' o °' 19.0' v I 1$ 4 3 �• trey_ -fit- - - n' '� 1 18.8 5 0, 5.3 LOT 2 �19. v 5 1 6J 6.5 •T\" ? SAT "' G)i In' 14. 7 6. 4 6 4 0� Q1:1 5.0 00 • v 10. i . o I SH o0 sLD o G F 1 2. 0 - - ,.lq 16. M 12' 1 BLDG . E 16.0 z z 30.4 ' o M 1 2. 9•- cy - 4 0 0 1 6. 0 I \ 120,95 O w 0, of °i 63. 8 1 . 8 ' `I o' ' I OD a 1a A o A 5 i N LOT 3 C.i p W ;, � x Y C 0C ' KCSP AFC! 8305030409 `O ,� - - Co a T w L� i T ___ SAT . J. HUSAN � K- HOOF o C C DISH ~ ---------- A/C DRIVE ----- ---------------_--- ' 30, 30' AND PARKING 20~WATER ESV'T.� rn , TYP . -CE - --- °o -------------------- ---- ------------ 13 T T ' T SAT. - -- -- - SHED SHED DISH_ ,r,r ,,,.. _.. -LCE" 'LCE CE 00' 132 10' 1.8' " 1 -20� DRAINAGE ESM'T. N 00°56.8"E 503.13' FNE I R W/CAP rc� S 0056 � 1 8 W - 15025 ° _ N HOSSEIN SABOUR-MOHAJER O� ,o CAROL LIN CAROL lIN 0 � Gn Iz _ v ° �Io � Qoo of I 1m� � 1 I I EXISTING 1/16TH COR. ' FND. MON. IN CASE. N 00'56'1_8-E N 00056'18-E (BASIS OF BEARINGS) /I c 1330.46 -REC. ) l 16TH AVE~. SE - VE I/4 COR. SEC. 29-24-5. E COR. SEC. 29-24-5. FND. MON IN CASE. FND. MON. IN CASE. A CONDOMINIUM N.W. 1/4. S.E. 1/4. SECTION 29. TWP. 24 N. RGE. 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON. COUNTY OF KING. STATE OF WASHINGTON. SITE SURVEY LEGEND ---------------------------------- FND. SURFACE MON. 12/23/98 • - CALCULATED PROPERTY CORNER. FND CORNER AS NOTED S 1 f LL LAND SJ� JOB *96008CO3 HANSEN SURVEYING RENTON, WASHINGTON TEL, 425-235-8440 LATEST REVISION: SCANNED JUN 10 AYEET 3 OF 6 IN5rALL TYPE .r GS '" TRUCIvZ*i� OZT. WAL( C7�K�GT f�-GGW iO 114t { ,�. ��- -�� /�L1-TMM DESIGN C3Y OTXE r \ Y f'Lr, N �'N �� _ + Z W. M . I A44 , o F 14 tTGJL cp ' S OIL SEPARATOR ENGA. OWG : t j- 1. E• 7�T //J F/ LP-• M/N• � ,- LP 5 1 Iri.•� C �Exlh7. qu�;z�Y SPgLLS o _.. • oN � �rE�Ariov� UT. P- \ f ° ".rI'4ti�N r. �" , •/ r �� rl t i �- q' 1 -....� .� _ _ .-.-�" ' 7esgn Lz �nq—MSHO H20-4 a =d SaO.rxtcr , C.- _—_ _ o �i %� SEE� GlHNC•E ¢-LZ-q 'EJ/Gt� 5�H/GH ,, ^ �� ,, �...+ wfti�f • ff l•�lff�i�fft��!_af i�'�moo— -4111b..1111—Mill- - - - aw— IL2z cc 44 w a. Z � CL �y f_7 / hl lam A' ,a fO' A. T THICX-, ' I •b4�+4 ' � 2 s �; itad 105,50 ' ! � \tip Faso � I•L`.= Io2.ha IT- 1�` •, l _..- \ . '� - _ _ FRAt•r,G g LAOOER OLSTEPS — ` I \ ` \ •! \ �� &COVER ELEVAT", PVW OiOVE SEE NOTES. FRAME •%� ' K.' b-1.00 ' ~, \ R-3.1�5�� I r PR�OV oe DwE-rEcEV.iv o1°I =�.y._ .••. FT' 114.r�0 \ d.:AIL SrLPARATAON Pie OL N j /t' FF =10f $20 ELEV: �12.0� IT SPALlS ; ' \\ ' 1 FF=,108.00-- IV THIcy- / r HEADWALL DETAIL \ 30 Lf-' 56 LD aMV6E, 4-ZL-9/ lP \ woTE: vve/NG C.oN:;`R TioN - IHIbH N 5ED/MENTATi0f43 )LLB ! - / G sir`LL !s.L�}/►iN LJNM-'FEND- -( com-rgOCLED or&A5/NG NAY � i 1 �. - _ DC-96'N� Pf oTHEAG, DRIPLINE of TFE� AND 41114 RY SPAL[ 5�6"M/N)N- v v IN !t. i • Tti . FF za,60 3-0(0 -9L I ,( n \ FF=mta C G,b.1' T(,I a� ��-\ : D 1 ► cap` 1qA -rrd s — ' �"•' G�TEt`tfl NPOND I i , erM= ,o az: �K• Bfo•i2 I _• 5 3 .I � ► o � /.ES�Z.a `\ , .- � h.E=•'t9.11 La.= al•3� /� VOL U Me �, P 12, 3 5 fi I 1 .r'' \ �`�' . i ' YoL u ME rw pe p'• L3,200 "', I �; ; `, \\ �� E X 1 S ► �Ot,1SE __- {� Ter- %sue-+'►�`.-.. ='11.'''1'!j� A LF a / (2 G, r �" 5 • Z.OGj _� - 70 P SIDS- G4- G 1KUGT N j I I j j 6 x �9 �'� `� '„� �"►-' -er G>z 32 +As HeAr;vj^ I, l.lN GI5 W i I I 1 �,�. \\ .� Y �, ;'"�--r----- r- _N 4 I.E.•a'sI. I , 6mR1.LA 8� M{N�l�UI� 1 (� 1 h VPF,VtL, Plrs- INLr T T6 MATC.N I r +� '�; o �\ f��9P>0- - --r --�- t ,•�G � � F ? _ #*.t#L GiGI�E�i . rVV� DETAIL. i � l i �, � ��'c r � �S jd 0 �• • . \ � P ` _ 1 � N Ex G b AbogT--. EXTEND Z44OCP /5�r I / r I Ir �� _ r "o \ �•g� �\ /` / I +y `�- I' I� -- - rYi; i?E6,eW6 z rD /NA7� LF - � ROG la -I N L. a G)LO rb W/ t r i r r • PIPR SVPPORT(S): - Vx.01OCIA4 i BOLTWO OE IMBEDDED 2` IN WALL ATM.•x, 5• SP•.CI.+C•. MIN ONE S,UPPOR.T, Timm I K'f E!. V.: 13.2 ROUND SOLID COVER MA RxE D ' DLA! N ' WTH LOCKLNC4 BOLTS - SEE OWG'.5• N. 495,50 KCRS MAX. 5� -.^- STAN DA 2.D GAL\ 1N Q E D STIWEL LADDEe./STEPS. SEE DWG,. W. ) 5 KC RS. cLEANOVT GAT4 � SHEAGZ GATE. SE!! OWC. No 53 KCRS /z a� 2 � V Go; S � WOK 64AMIPS �t5°C•tYP.)5EE rLkJtf I 0 � (E4PJf.A�,, GNp '\ �De rum04 f tl l? / `I :'• :\ j� ji�1� 1 // — -- a v v v G!l.l� M1 ---- -- -- - - ---- -- I F I / j I �� 6� �•', :� \ (/� ` \` r 1 / \ _ �.� — _ � �k"p1 A• Sm00Tn � � 1 '� I * � coN4TRUCT TYPEI G.P S. i I \ ti}`. 6 2 :I 2 `g'SW . GATE - -_ - - _ - _---+� /• _� GONE TRAC>H RA4c OVER EN , ► *='1. y \ - FF • 815,0 _ - - - 0}: iZssG.P. GAR.- (A -00 r 1 r �6 \ _ u __-- ----- -- - - SPL\G�p i+ D,C .N,qc, I.E.3 b°i.°{�i, ! ! i � � ,a L �`• \ � � - �� 9g •' `.___-- - °��' -'c f - _ -- - _ .Q �� JI y,• G too LIDGEI�F PaNGE 1 I i 1 • i \ \ , \� GP \ \ �� \`\ ) PLAN Vf W Og N 's i Q 05 s Z r*'�tc - _ __ - - '� Fes`:81 NO SGALA - `i a fh 0114 WAtep- 6 EEC: G"RAGE 4 ,'A-A' s > _- 71P 1 rE fz (�. a� �0 L ' Q _ FF=�850 ti SECTION �A- NO ScAL 1w 1,411+ Ye uhpa `INCLNPR �/ E !. -1 / ri4 Sia2 aLpe- t �,� ��FF = 1 LONh 00l � W D 8-I,W _M VIPER,1 LDWE.R B�woS EXISTI NO ) ., . �'�\ - ,x !� \ �' - FF = 3630 do - - - 'I' �L v 4u &RV Ei8ut-�{F-a N s A�I�W WFdF I'WWH0LE I _ i r AIL _ _ - - - - - - >E ►.1oTC � � �� , �1 R7�f�D'r0 t%11 IN � to � o N \ K/�11% �I bf OF rAJkTE. (EXIT.=(.1-v5)T012•� \ � i b� �\ � ` ` � �� -- - / _ 1 � G►R.,ev� of G, 6. ?A� !w �� _ ; '- I � I � v OUTLET PIPE I — SEE NOTE 6 W._i7 PIPE ,F PIPES ' 1`IN:ERT ELEV s 7Pj.Ci(0 t2�J INV•QT ELEV. N �,, RJiMOVAB:E WATER- �\ RESTRICTOL PlA''� �'" � i TICaHT 40UPLSt13-1 ,'�,•' WITN POTGOUD if ONLY FOR OIL POI I.iJT10M = i - 1 41 I ` PLATE v/LT,4r :•li3t}1";` DETAIL r'`E '21g��' E It.ldi.3ly; No seAu c it RE5M 0TOK M.N. - TYFF- ff PROVIDt. `^INT. /46s44 Bi WE&.0'P4s('+) 40ss BAPS A5 FLgr�G 80Lfs YrtOVID4E L66KIAW mEcHAa't 5 m (w/ P,oric.ocK) a� LowER Es+u, L+Lt,TE L.AP09K STOPS D12CL1t-.)' BELow E•1P P{/MT 4 4.• y J TOP of KETpJNitlf�hMt.1-�3, �. / &* � \ . D ! 1i / I B BhND (S 17ETAIL� SHEET-I� -- - _ zS ,c �4, _ _ `B RA ,y - _, _ — — — — J AMOV t.AMP-. RISCi� 3/4` % -1' w! L _ _©_ _ C 2.115 /w(� IatEv _ • , d _ T - -• ELEV. = 12.04 8" nUG200 LF 8P oi}f.D Y T" \ / j 7var15PbR t�cr"totil NPE 2 9 \ , ' , '= - DE rA i . yoGK CLAMP c, o / % � - f i(��T I'1H`�T(PG h t GKED FOR\\\COMPLI�;, C. y ,� �i�� it �F Nm sc;•�.>: +/ c 5 rE PS Rom• 115A0. JO, CIT ST' NDARD FOR v ,ttu\IN; out IV iN o . STORM DRAIN LEGEND slo t aie e,� �� ' i2►+ I. E. -' 4�,0 � IN G�.. GB.� Da'.e '-� Zs PYG POLYVINYL GHL.ORIOE , P>:Iz ASTM 3o3s, 5DQ 35 N - b �•/ \\ /' / / 7 LE. ; l.i•b4 $" Its I 2 I,E.=C�•'�� ,---"tub y� - G.P. - CONGfZETE.' PIPE, uN3ZEINFORCED, PEA. ASTM C 14 1- p*tf.N3rARC Fa1Z A1154~U/h' L$. frK P/FFEKE+YT' o l, c.ohlorfF��f Y To eW .cv �i r O81 x IT! x IV CEP -or-4 PAv C f ,CLASe7 t- A'A• 4' ';, • AP.10-47 0*71-- SimO -ro RVAIT>+/A1 45 4Ny4.=_ AN ttePrAl_ - r Akz,,, Avc, ?. 0.4- 1 AY- AP%GI 14 or AAleS AR04-I P zae-FK fi V a NOM. ALL 6-lb APZ TYPE . I �•I, - pIIC(ILP, IRON, G{.A55 50 z. A�ET.�L PkRTs: eoggos(Dr(I �5/5rR/YTi'�EC-Ph2TS 4,t411Av11-eP QVPrp� � UAILE PS 5HOWN 5ENCH MARK = SEE SHEET ONe , NDTE *'I CONE TRASH RACK- M . H # 2 C> NO SCAc_1= r- SEC 29, T WN 24 N., R 5 E, W.M. \ STANDARD CURB 6 GUTTER EX SS MH A T DRW Y SECTION /\ • • RIM EL = 5130' I.E.-37.94-A"S tii �c � i � oa ZX ,EX SS MH`z V` �� RIM EL =54.80' e*1 E EGROUND PIPE ti IF = 45.00' - 8" N ols 72 12, CMP $7 U \ \ ` 2" ASPHAL TIC CONCRETE (MINI CLASS 9' N \ \ I I/2" MIN. COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED NOTE.' ( SURFACING BASE COURSE 5/8" MINUS SEE SHEETS C2 & C3 \, �iJ/ CITY OF RENTON No. 16-4-8 2 //2" MIN. COMPACTED DEPTH CRUSHED FOR CONTINUATION OF STORM NE1�I 6+ \' �, (1 SURFACING BASE COURSE I/4" MINUS. SEWER OUTFALL & 1 p>x. Z de �� n0 v DETENTION & CONTROLS \�j ��/� SL 0 T TED DRA /N DE TA /L ORIGINAL GRI STRUCTURES & FACILITIES / IM= 4 I• \ � b N. T. S. / / 4'-6' PA Y L IM/ TS / / I \ EXCA VAT /ON ONL Y / / / / .� �"s \ ROCKERY DETAIL N T.S. ,on-► D-d Plot* / \ \ In-p-aion COVIn 66&ST Top SCALE• l" 20'. 91 -r \ T (by -) J •A� / / / / / / / / .(pal R� . go -Door \ \ Oil R. .a 9.qN / / / / / \ ��• O �' v-u�t HD. 65058 0g/ 5 T50 i 08 79. s OJ / 79.9 \ \ \ Ot1o 00 co %, 79.I0 / eo / C RB RAMP .1\co 205LF /2" /CMP e S - /9.04X 7990 79.4 �j O / t 'i a' 62.02 OI /WA TER SEPARA TOR I \ / / �Qo / 90 RIM - a, tll' I&.Z4 IE=74.28' - 12" 4. M qD / / 76.00 \ 61.661 err po � -- � / 34LF /2" 0 CMf' 2,S . 3.59/. A / 1�. �\ lop 79.50 79.50 CB #4 - TYPE I OD / l //0. 60" 0 CMP S = .0.5% = II�O' E T a M R/= �S- "t I RO CH CK EV RY 2' VERT RO 6" C Cu PI I a 5 `� IN ITCH ELEV ION 79.66 20 O C. ( T P. IAs-9(447- C \T 415 31 VARIABLE 1}_ 'MIN. THICKNESS OF °ECIF/ED BACKFILL ERFERA T£D DRAIN PIPE CB o 2 TYPE l/ 54 " 0 SCALE: /" = 2' RIM EL 68.00' Frame, Grate & Round Solid Cove Removable Watertight Marked "DRAIN" with Locking olts r-me%tMcy Ovel4(Ow Coupling 0/ FtaNge. See Note 3 & KCRS Dwgs 49 & 5 '51pillwoli W•4' . 222-P bm-4 Pl-u �� lev. r Plans Vertical Bar Grate 2" I�iin. - I• M1►1• for Pond Overflow OJ�R FI.oL�t/ T:04" .EL. = 62.20t. ---ORIFICE Y' AIR RELIEF h _ Max. Design W. •-a�� 6.. _ 3.2/" (g•• min.) 1 Q EL • 63.50 Max. - �- ��I - St v. Handholds Plate Welded to Erbow Pipe Supports / I Steps or With Orifice as Specified See Note b 1 ,� . See KCR Dwg. 39 Elbow -Restrictor to NO SCs1i.E 1.5 Dia - -Elbow Restrictor See Detail ••' �nbN Melt .nD Min . Z M I N BAFFLED I outlet Pipe Inlet I2" P I IE • 57.95 OIL/WATER See Noce: I 5 Pipe(sl' o SEPARATOR DETAIL - - -'E " 57.45 I£ . 57.95 � Invert & Elev. ."" � � MAX. CAPACITY 450 GAL. Per Plans � - Sheaf Gate W S = Control Rod For FLOW AT I5 MIN. RETENTIOM 30 ".m. fV Cleanout/Orain Restrictor Plate " ( Rod Bent as Req-d W/ Orifice Dia. �� c - as Specified for Vertical Alignment CB • I - TYPE l (Not Needed if for 4/a" 'A l? w/ Cover) RIM =.cf�' CSo t f for Oil Pollution DIA. -- x See KCRS Dwg. 53 Control Only) 15+59 1 •SE-44WR op Ptim ATT?VTZ.H" 6y 44A6K.grcp 62 BANDTD ALLa+J KF_Kovm.Sect ion A -A NO SCALE �.. 16+00 tiQI�CB x 2 - TYPE l/ 54 " 0 .3 \ ,v \� } 1- USE MINI. • E• IF METAL OUTLET PIPE CONNECTS PE p1A CATCH BASIN TYPE ? TO CEMENT CONCRETE POPE: ' •Y OUTLET PIPE TO "AVE SMOOTH ?' OUTLET CAPACITY: OEWLOPEO O.D. EQUAL TO CONCRETE PIPE 3LF 120 SL0 TED-DR DESIGN FLOW 1.0. LESS 114-. Q S : /-OOX 3. METAL PARTS: CORROSION e. PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE 3- X .Me RESISTANT. GALVANIZED PIPE GAGE SUPPORT BRACKET PARTS TO HAVE ASPHALT. ANCHOREO CONCA�TE WALL TREATMENT 1.(MAX. 3'-0- VERTICAL SYACING) A- FRAME A LAOOER OR STEPS T. LOCATE ELBOW RESTRICTOR(S) AS 23LF /P /RCMP \ r £X• CB OFFSET NECESSARY TO PROVIOE MIN. \ A- CLEANOUT GATE IS VISIBLE CLEARANCE AS SHOWN, S = 1. 4X �. \ FROM TOP. S 8. CUMB-0OWN SPACE IS CLEAR LOCATE AOOITIONAL LADDER RUNGS 84FFLE / _\ \ EX 2C. 12 Of RISER ANO CLEANOUT IN STRUCTURES USED AS ACCESS TO �QWATER s'. GATE. TANKS OR VAULTS TO ALLOW ACCESS M RATOR � F'(" \ F.}- C. FRAME IS CLEAR Of CURB. WHEN CATCH li fILlEO WITH WATER. / RISER T. co RECOWNDED FOR APPROVAL BY: CNP., / zo s = 3 ^y rn S'(ORh,LID tAS' -K" 8_� Q -mil_ /_� _�l /Qw.P_ -e-9/ 12 A N f0 61f OF�Rf.N ON------------------- xNil � p ItM TY 9- 37ZWM: WATER UTIL I TY PLAN REVIEW J� r EX. CB eHN W pt , ./ ��/ ACE TO TY TAN04RDS BY: LF /f" 0 ICMP �� -- -- - - - - - - --- = 28.7% \ \\I % T l L l T Y S EMS MANAGER NT I NANCE SEES MANAGER \Vk AOS TRNSPRTATION YSTEMMN S AAGER I p F/L TRA T/ON DI TC/� I \� OJ�' 1991 -- / v W/RIP RAP /E r \;� , CITY O F R E N T O N 10.0, ram, �, rn O 2"- 4" OUARRY SPALLS LW/R/P RAP Z DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS !� AfikRIM EL r!'3P 11 36"CMP RISER TRASH RACK 2" 4" QUARRY SPALLS TfM TYP P K L U A BLDG. a ASM��F� Y I E .. '-wen R /A/ EL =68 CONTROL S TRV ZURf ...., .�.�'' i \ „'� I I v LS W/FRAM£ I KING LID R/M • B�,,A' �s.o'� '"v�l►l ' `4�'1 WATER DAVID FVA1004401MCIATES, INC, BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 7 (21M6A dtLle 71 HYDRMEED/NG OR PLANTING OF B/OF/LTRATION o=.a� cF /f 0.15• SWALES SHALL BE ACCOMPL/SHED PRIOR TO I STORWIAE INSTALLATION AND THE GRASS SHALL BE FULLY ESTABLISHED PRIOR Tb RELEASING STORM DRAINAGE INTO SWALES. i•o• BI O-FI LTRAT ION DITCH DETAIL OVERFLOW = 6s.45 '•+ I.E. �12" S & NE lE S?.at S lE S?.47 IE S'f• N 4 S NO. AS 6UIvf S£o� Qc0to SlbrFlCl/•Oft/1� tbt C1'1Y Cr' F�s�i!>!o/ i�ca✓�. ch�"JI'1 �l n� REVISION - �' QO, 120 Of r ZIT Mf I BY APPR. i, l S��L(�i( /�zj,f''o DATE STORM, S.S. & GRAD 1 NG PLAN DESIGNED: OT DATE%.%W/UNE 6, /990 FILE NAME:640-00/490/ DRAWN: MT SCALE: /" . t0' F1E1D BOOK: PAGE: CHECKED: MT APPROVED: SHEET: d rUnlo wlow1" �. 3_Z