HomeMy WebLinkAboutSWP271313I
Shdri Plat • (SHPL #- )
REQUEST FOR PROJECT # Prelim- Plat (PP#
CAG # )
To: Technical Services Date 3 2 WO# Green#
From: Plan Revicw/Project Manager
Project Name / 99A (� 7
(70 charaacri max)
Description of Project: /1& Er, AA)f GIEZI.4-'e- R I ✓�r-K
1�'rl' A�✓O 4?Aj,,2.t voll C/z k f �9 ni /1 c's ta/t/�Tt anJ
circle Size of Waterline:
8"
10"
12"
Circle One:
New
or Extension
Circle Size of Sewerline:
8"
10"
12"
Cucle One:
New
or Extension
Circle Size of Stormline:
12"
15"
18" 24"
Circle One:
New
or Extension
Address or Street Name(s)
D v 1p r/Contractor/Owner/Cnsl t.-:
(70 dtamac s max)
Check each discipline involved in Project Ltr Drwg # of sheets per discipline
C
❑ Trans -Storm Hrp/ nya ❑ ❑
(Roadway/Drainage) (Off zi(c imptvvcmcnts)('include basin name) (include TESC sheets)
❑ Transportation (Signalizition, Chan nelization. Lighting) ❑ Cl
❑ Wastewater ❑ ❑
Sanitary Sewcr Main (indude basin name)
❑ Water (Mains. Valves. Hydrants) ❑ ❑
(Indudc composite 6t Horizontal Ctrs Sheets)
Suface Water ❑ ❑
LY)(includc basin name)
Improvements
TS Use Only J WP-1 % " / 3 /3
9
IM
F C, A ,� V )�k, �
December 14, 1987
Monday, 8:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Municipal Building
Council Chambers
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and
called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; NANCY L. MATHEWS,
COUNCIL MEMBERS RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KATHY A. KEOLKER, ROBERT J.
HUGHES, EARL CLYMER. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY
' CLYMER, ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER REED BE EXCUSED.
CARRIED. (Councilman Reed arrived at 8:51 p.m.)
CITY STAFF IN
ATTENDANCE
PRESS
APPROVAL OF
COUNCIL MINUTES
CONSENT AGENDA
CAG: 87-075, South 7th
Street and Rainier
Avenue South
CAG: 87-077, CBD
Sanitary Sewer
Replacement and Renton
Hill Alley Sewer, Phase II
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City
Attorney; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E.
MOTOR, City Clerk; CAPTAIN DON PERSSON, Police Department.
Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF DECEMBER 7, 1987, AS PRESENTED.
CARRIED.
Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
City Clerk reported bid opening 12/4/87 for S. 7th Street and Rainier
Avenue S. Street and Intersection Improvements; 3 bids; Engineer's estimate:
$251,469.09. Refer to Transportation Committee.
City Clerk reported bid opening 12/9/87 for CBD Sanitary Sewer
Replacement; 13 bids; Engineer's estimate: $193,022.82. Refer to Utilities
Committee. (See later action.)
Claim: Tindall, CL-56-87 Claim for damages in the amount of $85.79 filed by Alicia Tindall, 12859 NE
84th Street, Kirkland, for vehicle damage allegedly incurred as a result of
hitting broken piece of cement divider at intersection of S. 26th Street and
Benson Road (10/29/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service.
Claim: McCollam, CL- Claim for damages in the amount of $703.56 filed by Catherine McCollam,
57-87 16952 157th Avenue SE, Renton, for vehicle damage allegedly incurred when
struck by cast iron collector dislodged by City water line workers above
Renton Car Wash (08/27/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service.
Claim: Taitano, CL-58-87 Claim for damages in the amount of $355.64 filed by Richard Taitano, 2147
NE 12th, Renton, for vehicle damage allegedly incurred in accident with
police vehicle at 800 Edmonds Avenue NE (12/08/87). Refer to City
Attorney and insurance service.
Plat: Preliminary, Chaves,
PP-035-87
Public Works: 1988 Cedar
River Channel Dredging
and Bank Repairs,
Maplewood Creek,
Department of Ecology
Funds
Hearing Examiner recommended approval of Hernando Chaves Preliminary
Plat request with conditions to subdivide 3.46 acres located at the northeast
corner of NE 20th Street and Aberdeen Avenue NE into 16 single family
lots, File No. PP-035-87. Council concur.
Public Works Department requested review of documents related to
Washington State Department of Ecology Flood Control Assistance Account
Program funds for the 1988 Cedar River Channel dredging and bank repairs,
Maplewood Creek restoration. Refer to Utilities Committee.
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
For a By City Clerk's Office Only
A.I. #
AGENDA ITEM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING
-----------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
SUBMITTING
Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Public Works Department
Staff Contact Robert E. Bergstrom
Name
SUBJECT: Reg ue t for Coun ;1 adoptinn of
a resolution to give Mayor and City Clerk
authority to execute documents requestine
allocation of Flood Control Assistance
Account Program Funds
Exhibits: (Legal Descr., Maps, Etc.)Attach
A. Draft Resolution
B. Department of Ecology Correspondence
C.
COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refer to
Utilities Committee,
For Agenda Of December 14 1987
Meeting Date
Agenda Status:
Consent ✓"
Public Hearing
Correspondence
Ordinance/Resolution
Old Business
New Business
Study Session
Other
Approval:
Legal Dept. Yes X NoN/A
Finance Dept. Yes No.
_ N/A
Other Clearance
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required $ Amount Appropriation -
Budgeted $ Transfer Required $
SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation)
(Attach additional pages if necessary.)
The proposed resolution is to give the Mayor and City Clerk authority to sign and execute
all necessary documents relating to the request for Washington State Department of Ecology
Flood Control Assistance Account Program funds for the following projects:
1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs,
Maplewood Creek Restoration
PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED:
SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION
I
i
j
I
II
- - i�-
LR V
49
, / � Y-� Cub I- 61�1
0p ctn V.
ell
0
I
I
I
i
I
u ✓ r-
v�.......
o- v
........__
I�—
Municipa' `irport
OF R�
zOIL
o
9,0 �•
0911
TtD SEPISORKQ
Undergrc Power Conversion
ECF:
City of Renton `u:
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as Zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of Checklist for Nonprolect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),
the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Renton Municipal Airport -
Underground power conversion along Cedar River frontage.
2. Name of applicant: City of Renton, Department of Public Works
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E.
(206)235-2631, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055
4. Date checklist prepared: December 4, 1987
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction April, 1988.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related
to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain.
Yes. The Cedar River annual dredging will occur after the power line
conversion.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
None.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes, Airport pavement project.
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
NONE
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page.
The power conversion work involves undergrounding the 7500 volt single phase
power system north of N. 5th St., on the west side of the Cedar River to
the north end of the Cedar River hangars.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
The Renton Municipal Airport lies north of Airport Way, east of Rainier Ave. S.W.
and west of the Cedar River.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 5%
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Gravelly/sand/silt.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
No.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
None.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
No.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
No change.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
N/A
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
None.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emission?
No.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
N/A
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
Yes, Cedar River and Lake Washington.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
None.
- 3 -
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general descri;tion, purpose, and approximately quantities if known.
No.
5) Does thr proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site clan.
Yes.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
discharge.
No.
b. Groum
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if
known.
No.
2) Desc, waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic ranks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industral, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
None.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
No.
-4-
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
Temporary erosion and silt control techniques will be used to
contain construction erosion.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
❑ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
❑ evergreen tree: fir. cedar, pine, other
❑ Shrubs
d( grass
❑ crop or grain
❑ Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
❑ water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
0 other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Grass areas will be replaced if altered.
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
None.
S. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Rodents
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
None. The Cedar River is a salmon spawning stream.
O&M
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
The proposed project is a re -construction of the electrical power
distribution system.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
No.
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
None.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
No.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
N/A
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
None.
IVE
2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation. other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
N/A
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Municipal Airport. To the east, the river bank is a City park/trail.
To the east of the park area is the Main Boeing Aircraft Co.
facilities.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
C. Describe any structures on the site.
The Municipal Airport has hangars, aircraft manufacturing structures
and a control tower.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
None.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
P-1
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Public
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
Urban.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so. specify.
No.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
Approximately 15,000 people work at the Boeing Airplane Co.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
-7-
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
N/A
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
All the power system will be undergrounded. The transformers will
be installed in above -ground cabinets.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
No.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None.
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
None.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
No.
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A
MIE
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
The Cedar River Trail/Park lies on the east side of the river.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
M
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
No.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
N/A
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Rainier Ave. S.W., Airport Way, Logan Ave. N., N.6th St.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes.
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
None.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No.
-9-
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
Yes, the project is at the Renton Municipal Airport.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
None.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None.
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)?
If so, generally describe.
No.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any.
N/A
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
All public services are available.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or
in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
The proposed project is a utility improvement to the power
distribution system.
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.
Proponent:
IX
Name Printed: Robert Bergstrom, P.E.
CITY OF RENTON
Department of Public Works
- 10-
*17F 11-R-R4
Municipal Airport 0398Z
East Side Power Conversion
CITY OF RENTON
Building & Zoning Department
(206) 235-2550
SHORELINE MASTER APPLICATION
APPLICATION FOR:
OFFICE USE ONLY:
Application No.:
SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
ECF No.:
PERMIT
_
SEC-TWP-R:
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
Date Approved:
VARIANCE
Date Denied:
_
Publication Date:
_ EXEMPTION
Comprehensive Plan:
REVISION
Zoning:
Water Body:
STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
Date Received:
Application Received By:
Application Determined To Be:
o Accepted o Incomplete
Notification Sent On:
By (Initials)•
Date Routed:
Additional Material Received by:
Application Determined To Be:
❑ Accepted o Incomplete
Notification Sent On:
By (Initials)•
In addition to the information below. the applicant should include a site
map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review
of this application. The Building and Zoning Department reserves the
right to require additional information needed to evaluate the
application.
APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORXATION REQUIRED IN ITEXS 1-10 THROUGH 14-16 BELOW:
INFORMATION:
1. Applicant Owner___L_Purchaser
Name: CITY OF RENTON Department of Public Works Lessee Other
Mailing
Address 200 Mill Ave. S., Renton WA 98055 Phone: (206)235-2631
2. Name of
Property Owner SAME
Mailing
Address
Phone:
3. Contact/
Consultant: Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E., Engineering Supervisor
Mailing
Address
Phone:
PROJECT INFORMATION:
4. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or
nearest street and intersection)
Renton Municipal Airport at Logan Ave Airport Way. Rainier Ave S W ,
Lake Washington, Cedar River.
5. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet):
On file in the Department of Public Works.
6. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: Cedar River
7. Current use of property and existing improvements: Municipal Airport.
8. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY and proposed improvements (be specific):
Same.
9. Proposed construction costs and schedule:
A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed
project include additional developments contemplated but not
included in this application: $10,000.00.
B. Construction dates (month/year) for which permit is requested:
Begin April 1988 End May 1988
10. List any other permits for this project from state, federal, local
governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have
applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency,
whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the
application, whether the application was approved or denied and the
date of same, and number of the application or permit:
None.
ITEMS 11, 12, AND 13 TO BE COAPL=D BY LOCAL OFFICIAL:
11. NATURE OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE. (Describe type of shoreline, such
as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain,
floodway, delta; type of beach, such as accretion, erosion, high
bank, low bank, or dike; material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay,
rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any):
Rip -rap surfaced river bank.
12. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will
exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above the average grade
level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential
units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view.
None.
13. If the application involves a conditional use or variance. set forth
in full that portion of the master program which provides that the
proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance,
from which the variance is being sought.
No.
ITEMS 14, 15, AND 16 TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT:
14. If applying for a variance or a conditional use, complete the
variance or conditional use form.
15. Project Maps: Attach to application accurate site plan and vicinity
maps. Refer to application instruction handout for map requirements.
16. Additional information (If necessary, attach as separate sheet):
STATE OF WASHINGTON SS
CITY OF RENTON I
I,Robert E. Bergstrom, City of Renton Dept. of Public Works , being duly
sworn, certify that I am the above -named applicant for a permit to con-
struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act
of 1971. and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are
in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to me this i r2
day of 19i7
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
FORM 177
f_l l - Fc.�4 P
-5,Q4 19&Poo?d5
King County
Surface Water Management Division
Department of Public Works
701 Dexter -Horton Building
710 Second Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206)344-2585
October 14, 1988
Mr. Ed Hammersmith, Grant Administrator
Flood Control Assistance Account Program
Washington State Department of Ecology
Mail Stop PV-11
Olympia, WA 98054-8711
RE: Flood Control Assistance Account Program
(FCAAP) Proiect Status Report
Dear Mr. Hammersmith:
The enclosed project status report is being sent to you in response to
your request for information about these projects. Of the six FCAAP
maintenance projects funded during this biennium, one (ranked #4) has
been completed and has received a final on -site inspection by your office.
The project ranked number 9 is now being designed and is scheduled for
construction during 1989. Two projects (ranked 12 and 15) are no longer
eligible for FCAAP funding because the projects were completed in the fall
of 1987, before FCAAP grants were issued. The remaining two projects
(Bellevue $47,000 and Renton $154,000) are the subject of renegotiation
between the cities and your office. If the grants are finalized but
construction is not completed before June 30, 1989, is it possible to
extend the 1987-89 biennium funds for these projects until the end of the
1989 construction season?
Please contact me if there are questions about the information in this
letter. I an looking forward to your response tc the question about exten-
sion of FCAAP funds beyond June 30, 1989.
Sincerely,
//)ti A4s
1--, Jim Kramer
Manager
JK:WJ:jr(L.3)
Enclosure
2�41EJIV
OCi 18 1986
CITY OF RENTON
Engineering Dept.
cc: Damon Diessner, Director, City of Bellevue Storm and Surface Water
Utility
Charles Price, P.E., Engineer, City of Renton Storm Water Utility
Brad Miyake, Manager, Finance & Billing Section, Surface Water
Management Division
ATTN: Debbie Arima, Administrative Services Officer II
Wendy Jackson, Claims Analyst
FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT PROGRAM (FCAAP)
King County Project Status Report
Priority
State
State
Number
Project Title
Share*
X
2
Upper Main Channel
$ 47,000
50%
Stabilization
4
1987 Lower Cedar River
$ 25,000
50%
East Bank Repairs
3/7
Cedar River Channel Design
$154,000
30%
and Bank Repairs
9
Maplewood Creek
$ 25,400
40%
Restoration
12
Miller River Bridge
$ 5,557
40%
15
Miller River Curve
$ 4,416
40%
TOTAL:
$261,373
October, 1988
Current Status
Grant terms being renegotiated:
Bellevue and King County
request different project site.
Completed 1987 - vouchers being
being processed.
Grant terms being renegotiated:
Renton/WDOE.
Design stage construction
scheduled in 1989.
Completed 10-87. Could not
wait for FCAAP paperwork.
Completed 10-87. Could not
wait for FCAAP paperwork.
*October 9, 1987 letter from Carl Glatze to Donald J. LaBelle
NOTE
The total amount of FCAAP funds awarded to King County for the 1987-89 biennium is
$522,900. This includes a $235,500 planning grant to King County; a $36,000 planning
grant to Des Moines and a deletion of $9,973 of the $261,373 maintenance funds for
those projects which became ineligible due to early completion.
(N1)
RECEIVED /b//i/ Fi
( HRISTItvE 0. GREGOIRE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
-r Director CITY OF RENTON
��'i
y �ltl `
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Mail Stop Pl -I 1 • Oh mpia, Washington 98504-87 11 • (206) 459-6000
October 7, 1988
TO: Interested Persons
FROM: D. Rodney Mack, Program Manager
Shorelands and Coastal Zone Mana ement Program
SUBJECT: Flood Control Assistance Account Program (FCAAP)
Applications for the 1989-1991 Biennium
The Flood Control Assistance Account Program financially assists
local authorities, cities, counties, and certain special dis-
tricts, in flood control management planning and maintenance
projects associated with public benefits. Funds for the 1989-1991
biennium will be made available, beginning July 1, 1989. Applica-
tions are due on December 30, 1988. All applications must be sub-
mitted through the appropriate county public works department en-
gineer. Each application will be reviewed and prioritized prior
to a public hearing. An effort will be made to have agreements
for authorized applications in place by July 1, 1989.
Funds are available for the development of comprehensive flood
control management plans (CFCMP), with a minimum of a twenty-five
percent (25%) local match. A local match of at least fifty per-
cent (50%) is required for non -emergency maintenance projects.
Emergency maintenance projects require at least a twenty percent
(20%) local match.
The Flood Control Assistance Account Program is fully integrated
into the state's floodplain management program. Certain planning
and regulatory activities are required in order to be eligible for
matching funds for maintenance projects. Local authorities must
do the following:
1. Develop comprehensive flood control management plans as
specified in WAC 173-145, the permanent regulations for the
program's administration.
2. Engage in floodplain management activities that reduce flood
hazards in the 100-year floodplain by:
a. Participating in and meeting all requirements of the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP);
October 7, 1988
page two
b. Restricting land uses within the meander belt or
floodway to only flood compatible uses;
C. Obtaining certification by the State Department of
Community Development regarding the administration of a
comprehensive emergency operation plan.
3. Acquire all necessary local, state, and federal permits or
authorizations pries to beginning work; and
4. Receive Ecology approval of all construction plans and
specifications.
The Department of Ecology is placing a high priority on providing
funding assistance to local governments for development of compre-
hensive flood control management plans. A plan must either be in
place or be in process for the geographic area where a maintenance
project is planned, as a condition of receipt of state funds.
Maintenance projects maintain and restore the normal and reason-
ably stable river and stream channel alignment and capacity for
carrying flood waters with a minimum of damage from bank erosion
or overflow onto adjacent lands and property. The Flood Control
Assistance Account Program also seeks to restore, maintain, and
repair natural conditions, works, and structures for the mainte-
nance of such conditions. Projects that provide protection from
inundation or other damage by the sea or other bodies of water are
also included.
If you are interested in receiving an application packet or have
questions regarding the program or the application process, please
contact Lisa Randlette at (206) 459-6792 or SCAN 585-6792 or Ed
Hammersmith at (206) 459-6793 or SCAN 585-6793. The packet con-
tains the necessary information to prepare and submit an applica-
tion for grant assistance for a comprehensive flood control man-
agement plan or a maintenance project.
Completed application forms and other documentation must be sent
to:
Department of Ecology
Mail Stop PV-11
Olympia, WA 98503
Attn: Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program
Floodplain Management Section
MEMO FROM: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
T0: Chuck Price
DATE: July 19, 1988
RE: Shoreline Application
MEMO: Attached copy for your information.
Jerry Lind will submit an original to
State (1 original sent to Jerry - B&Z).
THANK YOU, Maxine F _ Mohr
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Audrey Benner
, being first duly sworn on oath states
that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the
VALLEY DAILY NEWS
• Kent Edition 0 Renton Edition • Auburn Edition
Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers
are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six
months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published
in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King
County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for
King County.
The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition
, Renton Edition x , Auburn Edition , (and not in
supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during the below stated period. The annexed notice a
Notice of Application
was published on June 3 and 10, 1988 R2981
The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the
sum of $ 3 8. 81
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 2 n d day of
VDN •87 Revised 11,86
June
19 88
blic for the State of Washington,
residing at Federal Way,
King County, Washington.
SHOREUME APFLICATiON'
NUnCEOFAPPLICATA7N FDff
S14CREUNE MANAGEMENT
SUBSTANTiALOEVELOPMEIVT PEAMti
Notice is hereby givert that The City of
Rentan; Department of Public_ Works.
Slorm Witter Divtt w has filed art apptica-
tiorr for a substantial development permit
for the canstructiarr or development of The
1989 Cedar River Dredging and Hank
Repairs:
Located: f3etweerr Lake Washington and
the Wells Avenue Bridge. Within Section(s)
T, 1T. & 18 of Townsnia ZT N. Range 5,
W;K. in the City. of Rentorr, King County:
Washington. Said devetaprnent is proposed
to: bw within thew Cedar: Riven andfor its
assaciatedwetlatrds
Any person desiring to express his views
or ter be notified: of the- actiorr taken on this
application shmft notitg the Building and
Zoning Department; Rentorr Municipal
6uik3ing; A f7 MIN Avenue Sautlt Renton;
Washingturr 98055 irr wrtting of his interest
withirr thirty (3a) days at the last publication
otthis notice.
Published in the Valley Daily News, .tune
3: & 10. 19W. R298Y
NELL
R
Earl Clymer, Mayor
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Dear Maxine:
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Design/Utility Engineering
MEMORANDUM
May 17, 1988
Maxine Motor, City Clerk
Charles Price, Storm Water Utility Engineer
1988 Cedar River Dredging
Publication of Shorline Application
Please publish the attached Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development
Permit for the 1988 Cedar River Dredging project.
Thank you for your assistance.
cm/pubcdr/cep: jlm
Attachment
CC: Jerry Lind, Building & Zoning
arles Price
WAY 3 8 N
D CITY CLEPK'S OrFICE
no
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
RECEIVED '-131:' /b y
PUBLIC VJORI .S DEPT.
CITY OF RENTON
King County
Department of Public Works
A)Rk4009XNOXR(x ky+?Pxxx
900 King County Administration lilrig.
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 296-6500
June 30, 1988
Richard Houghton
Director of Public Works
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Flood Control Assistance Account Proqram
Dear Mr. Houghton:
Enclosed are your duly executed copies of the following interlocal agreements
between King County and the City of Renton:
Lower Cedar River - East Bank Repair - CA(1 oiq - b6
Maplewood Creek Restoration - CAC 02o-s3
Also enclosed are State of Washington Invoice Vouchers and A-19 Voucher
Support Forms, both of which must be completed when billing for these proj-
ects. A copy of "Financial Guidelines for Grant Management" and other
material are also enclosed for your information in processing payments.
Compliance with these Washington State requirements and procedures is
necessary and required as part of the interlocal agreements between King
County and the City of Renton.
Please contact Wendy Jackson, Claims Analyst, Finance and Billing Section of
the Surface Water Management Division, at 296-6573 if there are questions
about the enclosed material.
Sincerely,
Paul Tanaka
Acting Director
PT:WJ:ds CL176
Enclosures
cc: Jim Kramer, Manager, Surface Water Management Division
ATTN: Brad Miyake, Manager, Finance and Billing Section
Wendy Jackson, Claims Analyst
i�. _1 � v,`� � ,. L,
`-
.�-
J '� �
C
- n� ti ;a G C� � rig r` r:� . ; ?� /
,�
d*
�.
� J,
�;,��' �,
�,.
CAC-019-88
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between King County,
Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the "County" and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation
duly authorized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the
parties are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action,
and
WHEREAS, the King County Council has by Motion No. 7199 passed on
May.31 , 1988, authorized the King County Executive to enter into an
agreement with the City of Renton for the purpose of financing the Lower
Cedar River East Bank Repairs Project in accordance with the Flood Control
Assistance Account Program (FCAAP) RCW Ch. 86.26 and WAC 173-145.
WHEREAS, City of Renton has by appropriate legislative action
authorized this agreement, and
WHEREAS, it is the interest of the public served by both jurisdictions
that said project be constructed,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS COVENANTED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement shall be to assist in financing
the Lower Cedar River East Bank Repairs Project which is eligible for
grant funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology Flood Control
Assistance Account Program.
-1-
2. Terms and Conditions. The County and the City agree to the terms and
conditions set forth in Exhibits No. I, II, and III, which are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
r--
King County Executive
Signed this day
of ,1988
61
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Deputy Prosecutin Atto e
CITY OF = TO NI , STATE OF WASHINGTON
1,&OLAA'i�
Mayor CT- -
Signed this / a-i day
of ,1988
APPROVED AS TO FORM
40A^.tv%cvt'�'
/.�
City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-2-
EXHIBIT NO. I
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The County's responsibilities under this agreement shall be limited to passing
through to the City any available State funding for the project and fulfilling
any further administrative duties required by statute, as set forth below.
A. Project Administration and Execution
1. The City will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents,
obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to the County for tech-
nical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval,
award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management,
prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all
project documentation as regarded by law and by the Washington State
Department of Ecology Grant Agreement No. G0088074, hereinafter, the
"Grant Agreement" and which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The grant agreement is administered by the Washington State Department
of Ecology, hereinafter referred to as the"Department".
2. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded
through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law.
No contract shall be awarded until approved in writing by the County.
The City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for
inspection and use by the County or the Department.
3. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing
appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency.
The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, construction management and any additional work required
to furnish a complete project. The County shall be responsible for
project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure
all work is done according to plans and specifications, and for final
project inspection in cooperation with the City and the Department.
4. This project will be designed and constructed in accordance with
applicable provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and Chapter 173-145 WAC.
The construction shall conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Department.
Payments toward construction will not be made until the plans and
specifications have been approved by the Department.
5. Within thirty (30) days after the award of the construction contract,
the City will submit to the Department a copy of the actual construc-
tion schedule, by month, for the entire construction period. If the
City fails to follow the construction schedule or does not receive
written approval from the contract officer to deviate from the sche-
dule, the Department and the County may terminate the grant for cause
as provided in Section D., herein.
6. The City will obtain any permits required for the project.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Two
7. The County, as signator with the Department on the grant agreement,
and the City as the lead agency for design construction, construction
management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the Grant
Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant
reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn pre-
sent to the Department for reimbursement to the City.
B. Payment of Grant Funds to Cit
1. When the City's actual costs exceed that major project element's
estimated total eligible cost described in Exhibit II by more than
ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County and
the Department, reimbursement for excess costs will be disallowed.
The County will not provide remittance in excess of the County's share
of the total eligible project cost. The County's share shall not
exceed fifty (50) percent of the total eligible project cost of
$50,097 in cash, including Washington State Sales tax, where appli-
cable.
2. Requests for payment of eligible funds will be submitted by the City
on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher
shall be submitted to the County along with information which docu-
ments the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of
the project. The voucher request form and supportive documents must
itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in Exhibit
II. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form
and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit III.
In this guideline, the words "CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE" refer to the City
and "DEPARTMENT" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology
which administers the Flood Control Assistance Account Program.
Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to:
Surface Water Management Division
King County Department of Public Works
710 Second Avenue, Suite 730
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Brad Miyake
3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more
often than monthly on a reimbursable basis.
4. All payments are conditioned upon submission to the County of the
above -mentioned itemized state voucher request form, certified by the
City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services
performed within the effective dates of this agreement unless a writ-
ten modification is obtained.
5. The County shall remit to the City for fifty (50) percent of the total
eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit II except for the amount
withheld as security for City's performance as specified in Section
B.6.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Three
6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be with-
held by the Department as security for City's performance.
Monies withheld by the Department as security under the provisions of
this paragraph will be paid to the City upon completion of the project
described in Exhibit II and final approval by the Department, or upon
completion and approval of portions thereof.
7. When voucher requests are approved by the County and the Department,
payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee.
8. The City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty
(30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in
Exhibit II.
9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County
and/or the Department and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be
refunded to the County by the City.
C. Indemnification
1. The County shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,
consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project
described herein, except as provided in Section A of this agreement.
2. To the extent the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington
permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any
claim of liability arising out of the project described in this
agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained.
D. Termination for Cause
The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory
performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In
the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this
agreement, the County may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder
and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination.
A notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior to the effective date
of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or
other materials prepared by the City under this agreement, at the option
of the County, shall become its property, and the City shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
E. Effective Date and Time for Performance
All work performed on or after July 29, 1987, by the City consistent
with Exhibit II, Project Description, although performed prior to the
effective date of this agreement, is eligible for reimbursement under
Exhibit II, Budget Information, so long as requests for payment for such
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Four
work are submitted to, and approved by the Department pursuant to Article
B. of this agreement. All work performed by the Department, and the
actions of the City in performing such work prior to the effective date of
this agreement, shall be subject to the provisions of this agreement.
Approval for this funding was given by a letter from the Department to the
County dated July 29, 1987.
For all other purposes, the effective date of this agreement shall be the
date the Grant Agreement is signed by the Department.
This agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1989.
EXHIBIT NO. II
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project consists of repairs begun July 29, 1987 on the Cedar
River's east bank from the mouth at Lake Washington to the Logan
Avenue North bridge. The repairs are for erosion damage and will
protect Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton
Cedar River Park. Repairs include back filling areas of bank, placing
riprap where necessary, and planting willows to provide vegetation and
habitat enhancement.
Project Location: Cedar River, S. 7 to 18, T. 23, R. 5
Project Completion Date: June 30, 1989
Estimated Costs for Eligible Work Items
Work Item Unit Qty. Unit Cost Cost
Heavy and
Loose Riprap
Tons
629
$ 25.00
$15,725.00
Gabions
Installed
Cu.Yds.
174
135.00
23,490.00
Filter Blanket
Tons
465
12.00
5,580.00
Back Fill
Cu.Yds.
366
3.00
1,098.00
Willow Plants
Each
300
1.50
450.00
Total $46,343.00
s
EXHIBIT II
continued
BUDGET INFORMATION
MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS
Estimated Eliqible Cost
1. Work Items
2. Design Pre -Engineering
3. Administrative Costs
4. Inspection Fee
5. Sales Tax
$ 46,343.00
3,754.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST $ 50,097.00
EXHIBIT No. III
Flood Control Assistance Account Project Grant Agreement
GUIDELINE:
SUBMISSION OF A19-A VOUCHER
AND SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS
The purpose of this exhibit is to assist the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE in deter-
mining allowable items of cost. If the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE fails to name an
item of cost in the request for payment, this does not imply it is either
allowable or unallowable; rather, determination of allowability shall be
based upon the treatment of similar or related items of cost.
1. Factors Allowing Cost
In order to be allowable, costs must:
a. Be necessary and reasonable and not be a general expense,
b. Not be prohibited by any laws or regulations,
C. Conform to any cost limitations or exclusions,
d. Be consistent with state and federal (when applicable)
policies, regulations and procedures,
e. Be given consistent treatment through uniform accounting
principles,
f. Not be allocated to or included as a cost of any other
state/federal financed program, past, or present,
g. Be net of all allowable credits.
2. Certification
To assure expenditures are proper, vouchers requesting payment must be cer-
tified by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE. Form A19-A has a certification provision
which must be signed by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE or its authorized represen-
tative before payment will be allowed.
3. Credits
The applicable portion of any income, rebate, allowance, and other credit
relating to any allowable cost, received by or accruing to the
CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE, must be credited to the DEPARTMENT, either as a cost
reduction, or by cash refund, as appropriate.
4. Unforeseen/Emergency Expenditures
A contingency line item providing a specified amount for reimbursements for
unforeseen expenditures may be made only with the prior written approval of
the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM7)
Exhibit No. III
Page Two
5. Allowable Expenditures
No request for payment will be honored for those expenditures incurred before
the commencement date of the agreement, or after termination of such
agreement, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing.
6. Contract Provisions Controlling
Where any discrepancies between the specific provisions of the agreement and
the applicable cost principles arise, the agreement provisions shall apply.
The DEPARTMENT will not provide reimbursement in excess of the DEPARTMENT'S
share of the total eligible project cost.
7. Phone Number
The CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE must include his business phone number along with the
documents requesting payment to expedite processing should questions arise.
8. Instructions - Form A19-A
Specific instructions for filling out the A19-A voucher and supportive docu-
ments are found in "Financial guidelines for Grants Management," Chapter 6,
published by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). A copy of
this text is available from the DEPARTMENT and is furnished with the
Pre -Application package.
9. Cost Object Breakdown
The documents supporting each request for payment must have a brief concise
breakdown of each cost object under the agreement, along with a brief expla-
nation for the charges.
10. Allowable Costs
Generally, whether costs are allowable depends upon cost principles appli-
cable to the particular project agreement. However, certain costs are com-
monly allowed. These include:
advertising
compensation for personal services
construction inspection
depreciation and use allowances
employee fringe benefits
employee morale, health and welfare
maintenance and repair
materials and supplies
taxes
transportation
travel related directly to this grant
project planning
project design
(CA -FORME)
Exhibit No. III
Page Three
Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees
during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual
leave, sick leave, court leave, military leave, and the like, if they are:
(1) provided pursuant to an approved leave system, and (2) the cost thereof
is equitable allocated to all related activities, including grant programs.
Employee benefits in the form of employers' contribution of expenses for
social security, employees' life and health insurance plans, unemployment
insurance coverage, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans,
severance pay, an the like, provided such benefits are granted under
approved plans and are distributed equitably to grant programs and to other
activities.
Where any questions involving allowability of costs arise, the DEPARTMENT
contracts officer should be consulted; otherwise, certain costs may be
disallowed.
11. Payroll and Distribution of Time
Amounts charged for personal service, regardless of whether treated as
direct or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls documented and approved
in accordance with the generally accepted practice of the state or local
agency. Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance or equivalent
records for individual employees. Salaries and wages of employees
chargeable to more than one cost objective must be supported by appropriate
time distribution records. The method used should produce an equitable
distribution of time and effort. Such time records must be certified by the
project director. Such certified records are the only allowable source
document for charging and reporting personnel expenditures.
12. Costs Allowable With Prior Written Approval
Certain costs require prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Costs
requiring prior approval include indirect costs, some direct costs such as
equipment, insurance and indemnification, and preagreement costs. Again,
reference to cost principles and consultation with DEPARTMENT officials
should eliminate any questions and possible rejection of incurred costs.
13. Unallowable Costs
Certain costs are commonly disallowed. These unallowable costs include:
bad debts
contingencies
contributions and donations
entertainment
fines and penalties
interest and other financial costs
underrecovery of costs under grant agreements
See Section XI, D.3., "Financial Guidelines For Grants Manaqement"
(CA -FORMS)
Exhibit No. III
Page Four
Once again, whether a cost is unallowable depends upon the applicable cost
principles to the agreement. Failure to clarify any question whether a cost
is unallowable or allowable may result in its disallowance by the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM10)
CAG-020-88
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between King County,
Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the "County" and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation
duly authorized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the
parties are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action,
and
WHEREAS, the King County Council has by Motion No. 7199 passed on
May 31 , 1988, authorized the King County Executive to enter into an
agreement with the City of Renton for the purpose of financing the Maplewood
Creek Restoration Project in accordance with the Flood Control Assistance
Account Program (FCAAP) RCW Ch. 86.26 and WAC 173-145.
WHEREAS, City of Renton has by appropriate legislative action
authorized this agreement, and
WHEREAS, it is the interest of the public served by both jurisdictions
that said project be constructed,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS COVENANTED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement shall be to assist in financing
the Maplewood Creek Restoration Project which is eligible for grant
funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology Flood Control
Assistance Account Program.
-1-
2. Terms and Conditions. The County and the City agree to the terms and
conditions set forth in Exhibits No. I, II, and III, which are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
King County Executive
Signed this day
of ,1988
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Deputy Prosecuting AttJorkey
CITY OF RENTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON
Mayor
Signed this /,,e,7L day
of ,1988
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-2-
EXHIBIT NO. I
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The County's responsibilities under this agreement shall be limited to passing
through to the City any available State funding for the project and fulfilling
any further administrative duties required by statute, as set forth below.
A. Project Administration and Execution
I. The City will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents,
obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to the County for tech-
nical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval,
award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management,
prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all
project documentation as regarded by law and by the Washington State
Department of Ecology Grant Agreement No. G0088115, hereinafter, the
"Grant Agreement" and which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The grant agreement is administered by the Washington State Department
of Ecology, hereinafter referred to as the"Department".
2. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded
through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law.
No contract shall be awarded until approved in writing by the County.
The City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for
inspection and use by the County or the Department.
3. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing
appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency.
The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, construction management and any additional work required
to furnish a complete project. The County shall be responsible for
project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure
all work is done according to plans and specifications, and for final
project inspection in cooperation with the City and the Department.
4. This project will be designed and constructed in accordance with
applicable provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and Chapter 173-145 WAC.
The construction shall conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Department.
Payments toward construction will not be made until the plans and
specifications have been approved by the Department.
5. Within thirty (30) days after the award of the construction contract,
the City will submit to the Department a copy of the actual construc-
tion schedule, by month, for the entire construction period. If the
City fails to follow the construction schedule or does not receive
written approval from the contract officer to deviate from the sche-
dule, the Department and the County may terminate the grant for cause
as provided in Section D., herein.
6. The City will obtain any permits required for the project.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Two
7. The County, as signator with the Department on the grant agreement,
and the City as the lead agency for design construction, construction
management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the Grant
Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant
reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn pre-
sent to the Department for reimbursement to the City.
B.Q Payment of Grant Funds to City
I(I(u 1. When the City's actual costs exceed that major project element's
estimated total eligible cost described in Exhibit II by more than
ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County and
the Department, reimbursement for excess costs will be disallowed.
�V�!
e County will not provide remittance in excess of the County's share
inr�y (y U) f the total eligible project cost. The County's share shall not
exceed€-i-f-y-f6&) percent of the total eligible project cost of
$63,510 in cash, including Washington State Sales tax, where appli-
cable.
2. Requests for payment of eligible funds will be submitted by the City
on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher
shall be submitted to the County along with information which docu-
ments the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of
the project. The voucher request form and supportive documents must
itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in Exhibit
II. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form
and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit III.
In this guideline, the words "CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE" refer to the City
and "DEPARTMENT" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology
which administers the Flood Control Assistance Account Program.
Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to:
Surface Water Management Division
King County Department of Public Works
710 Second Avenue, Suite 730
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Brad Miyake
3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more
often than monthly on a reimbursable basis.
4. All payments are conditioned upon submission to the County of the
above -mentioned itemized state voucher request form, certified by the
City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services
performed within the effective dates of this agreement unless a writ-
ten modification is obtained.
C/
5. The County shall remit to the City for percent of the total
eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit II except for the amount
withheld as security for City's performance as specified in Section
B.6.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Three
6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be with-
held by the Department as security for City's performance.
Monies withheld by the Department as security under the provisions of
this paragraph will be paid to the City upon completion of the project
described in Exhibit II and final approval by the Department, or upon
completion and approval of portions thereof.
7. When voucher requests are approved by the County and the Department,
payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee.
8. The City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty
(30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in
Exhibit II.
9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County
and/or the Department and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be
refunded to the County by the City.
C. Indemnification
1. The County shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,
consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project
described herein, except as provided in Section A of this agreement.
2. To the extent the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington
permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any
claim of liability arising out of the project described in this
agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained.
D. Termination for Cause
The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory
performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In
the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this
agreement, the County may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder
and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination.
A notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior to the effective date
of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or
other materials prepared by the City under this agreement, at the option
of the County, shall become its property, and the City shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
E. Effective Date and Time for Performance
The effective date of this agreement shall be the date the Grant Agreement
is signed by the Department. Any work performed prior to the effective
date of this agreement will be at the sole expense and risk of the City.
This agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1989.
EXHIBIT NO. II
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION: CITY OF RENTON STORM WATER UTILITY
GRANTEE: KING COUNTY
PROJECT TITLE: MAPLEWOOD CREEK RESTORATION
PROJECT LOCATION: MAPLEWOOD CREEK, S15,21,22;T23;R15
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project consists of engineering and construction for the removal of gra-
vel and sediments from the channel and settling basin, and stabilization of
currently eroding banks along Maplewood Creek.
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 30, 1989
Estimated Costs for Eliqible Work Items
Work Item Unit Qty. Unit Cost Cost
Excavating and Haul CY 550 $ 5.00 $ 2,750
Riprap Tons 1,750 25.00 43,750
Planting and
Revegetation LS 500
Clearing and Debris
Removal LS 1,500
Clean Up LS 1,000
TOTAL $ 49,500
EXHIBIT II
continued
BUDGET INFORMATION
MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS
Estimated Eliqible Cost
1. Work Items $ 49,500
2. Design Pre -Engineering 8,000
3. Administrative Costs 1,000
4. Inspection Fee 1,000
5. Miscellaneous
6. Sales Tax 4,010
TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST $ 63,510
EXHIBIT No. III
Flood Control Assistance Account Project Grant Agreement
GUIDELINE:
SUBMISSION OF A19-A VOUCHER
AND SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS
The purpose of this exhibit is to assist the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE in deter-
mining allowable items of cost. If the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE fails to name an
item of cost in the request for payment, this does not imply it is either
allowable or unallowable; rather, determination of allowability shall be
based upon the treatment of similar or related items of cost.
1. Factors Allowinq Cost
In order to be allowable, costs must:
a. Be necessary and reasonable and not be a general expense,
b. Not be prohibited by any laws or regulations,
C. Conform to any cost limitations or exclusions,
d. Be consistent with state and federal (when applicable)
policies, regulations and procedures,
e. Be given consistent treatment through uniform accounting
principles,
f. Not be allocated to or included as a cost of any other
state/federal financed program, past, or present,
g. Be net of all allowable credits.
2. Certification
To assure expenditures are proper, vouchers requesting payment must be cer-
tified by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE. Form A19-A has a certification provision
which must be signed by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE or its authorized represen-
tative before payment will be allowed.
3. Credits
The applicable portion of any income, rebate, allowance, and other credit
relating to any allowable cost, received by or accruing to the
CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE, must be credited to the DEPARTMENT, either as a cost
reduction, or by cash refund, as appropriate.
4. Unforeseen/Emergency Expenditures
A contingency line item providing a specified amount for reimbursements for
unforeseen expenditures may be made only with the prior written approval of
the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM7)
Exhibit No. III
Page Two
5. Allowable Expenditures
No request for payment will be honored for those expenditures incurred before
the commencement date of the agreement, or after termination of such
agreement, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing.
6. Contract Provisions Controlling
Where any discrepancies between the specific provisions of the agreement and
the applicable cost principles arise, the agreement provisions shall apply.
The DEPARTMENT will not provide reimbursement in excess of the DEPARTMENT'S
share of the total eligible project cost.
7. Phone Number
The CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE must include his business phone number along with the
documents requesting payment to expedite processing should questions arise.
8. Instructions - Form A19-A
Specific instructions for filling out the A19-A voucher and supportive docu-
ments are found in "Financial guidelines for Grants Management," Chapter 6,
published by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). A copy of
this text is available from the DEPARTMENT and is furnished with the
Pre -Application package.
9. Cost Object Breakdown
The documents supporting each request for payment must have a brief concise
breakdown of each cost object under the agreement, along with a brief expla-
nation for the charges.
10. Allowable Costs
Generally, whether costs are allowable depends upon cost principles appli-
cable to the particular project agreement. However, certain costs are com-
monly allowed. These include:
advertising
compensation for personal services
construction inspection
depreciation and use allowances
employee fringe benefits
employee morale, health and welfare
maintenance and repair
materials and supplies
taxes
transportation
travel related directly to this grant
project planning
project design
(CA -FORME)
Exhibit No. III
Page Three
Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees
during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual
leave, sick leave, court leave, military leave, and the like, if they are:
(1) provided pursuant to an approved leave system, and (2) the cost thereof
is equitable allocated to all related activities, including grant programs.
Employee benefits in the form of employers' contribution of expenses for
social security, employees' life and health insurance plans, unemployment
insurance coverage, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans,
severance pay, an the like, provided such benefits are granted under
approved plans and are distributed equitably to grant programs and to other
activities.
Where any questions involving allowability of costs arise, the DEPARTMENT
contracts officer should be consulted; otherwise, certain costs may be
disallowed.
11. Payroll and Distribution of Time
Amounts charged for personal service, regardless of whether treated as
direct or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls documented and approved
in accordance with the generally accepted practice of the state or local
agency. Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance or equivalent
records for individual employees. Salaries and wages of employees
chargeable to more than one cost objective must be supported by appropriate
time distribution records. The method used should produce an equitable
distribution of time and effort. Such time records must be certified by the
project director. Such certified records are the only allowable source
document for charging and reporting personnel expenditures.
12. Costs Allowable With Prior Written Approval
Certain costs require prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Costs
requiring prior approval include indirect costs, some direct costs such as
equipment, insurance and indemnification, and preagreement costs. Again,
reference to cost principles and consultation with DEPARTMENT officials
should eliminate any questions and possible rejection of incurred costs.
13. Unallowable Costs
Certain costs are commonly disallowed. These unallowable costs include:
bad debts
contingencies
contributions and donations
entertainment
fines and penalties
interest and other financial costs
underrecovery of costs under grant agreements
See Section XI, D.3., "Financial Guidelines For Grants Manaqement"
(CA-FORM9)
Exhibit No. III
Page Four
Once again, whether a cost is unallowable depends upon the applicable cost
principles to the agreement. Failure to clarify any question whether a cost
is unallowable or allowable may result in its disallowance by the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM10)
Christine Gregoire
,R k'ktxt;k' kkx42kki kxx
nire(tor
5TA H OI WASI IINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Afail ,top I'V-1 J • Olympi.i. W.ishirigion 9H50-1-87 J J • (200) 459-6(XX)
June 28, 1988
Environmental Review Committee
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Sirs:
Qkvek
F;ryn"V
We received the determination of nonsignificance for the
drainage improvements to Maplewood Creek. Although there is
no comment period on the DNS, we would like to note the fol-
lowing.
1. ANwater quality modification will be required from the
Department of Ecology for this project.
2. As noted, a shoreline permit will be required for this
project. The proposed project must comply with the goals and
standards of the local shoreline master program.
If you have any questions on Comment 1, please call
Mr. Robert Newman of the Northwest Regional Office at (206)
867-7046. Questions on Comment 2 should be directed to
Ms. Linda Rankin of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459-6763.
cc: Linda Rankin
Marlene Wylie, NWRO
Sincerely,
Barbara J.VRitchie
Environmental Review Section
E�' 9) �rl a 7 1
Puri :s9 tsas
CITY OF RENTON
Engineering Dept.
.�%',`.R � 3
1 Te
t-C)
e� y
� Vt, ;
' � � tin (� ��� S 1 Y►-, � ���� � lo�nS
y
Christine Gregoire
Rkk+kRkx�kzxxx
Director
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
WWI
�1Q ; M-0 w Cry. oeSrn tll :
Mail 51op PV-1 I • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (Z(X)) 459-6000
June 28, 1988 CITY (7F RENTON
JUN o I
Environmental Review Committee BU1LV-':G / 7.0NINIC, DEPT.
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
Dear Sirs:
We received the determination of nonsignificance for the
drainage improvements to Maplewood Creek. Although there is
no comment period on the DNS, we would like to note the fol-
lowing.
1. A water quality modification will be required from the
Department of Ecology for this project.
��. As noted, a shoreline permit will be required for this
project. The proposed project must comply with the goals and
�. standards of the local shoreline master program.
�~ If you have any questions on Comment 1 please call
Mr. Robert Newman of the Northwest Regional Office at (206)
867-7046. Questions on Comment 2 should be directed to
Ms. Linda Rankin of the Shorelands Program at (206) 459-6763.
cc: Linda Rankin
Marlene Wylie, NWRO
Sincerely,
Ice)
Barbara J.`/Ritchie
Environmental Review Section
E�Maly M
JUN :: J 1988
CITY OF RENTON
Engineering Dept.
/57
ANDREA BEAM RNKI'i: ?a .
Director
STATE (F 4% ASHINGToN
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
%lad titop Pt -I 1 • Olympia. VLa<htngton 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000
June 21, 1988
E�gTaaly
JN :'a 1988
Mr. Paul Tanaka CITY OF RENTON
Acting Director Engineering Dept.
King County Public Works Department
900 King County Administration Building
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
Re: Flood Control Assistance Account Program
Grants
Dear Mr. Tanaka:
Enclosed are your duly executed copies of the following grants
between the Department of Ecology and King County Department of
Public Works:
G0088074 - King County - Lower Cedar River - EAST BANK
Repair (6-27) - effective August 29, 1987 An
G0088115 - City of Renton - Maplewood Creek Restoration P
(9), effective June 20, 1988
Also enclosed are (reproducible) state of Washington Invoice
Vouchers, and A-19 Voucher Support Form, both of which must be
completed and submitted when billing the department. A copy of
"Financial Guidelines for Grants Management" and other material
are also enclosed for your information in processing payments.
Please be sure to use the above referenced grant numbers in all
correspondence, billings, etc.
If you have any questions, Ed Hammersmith, Grant Officer, can be
reached at 459-6793 (SCAN 585-6793).
Sincerely,
Beverly Huether
Grants/Contracts Coordinator
Shorelands and Coastal Zone
Management Program
Enclosures
cc: Georgeann Farr, Fiscal Office
Ed Hammersmith
Ron Holcomb
Jim Kramer
Charles Price, P.E.
C�
King County
Department of Public Works
900 King County Administration Bldg.
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206) 296-6500
June 16, 1988
Jerry Louthain, Supervisor
Floodplain Management Section
Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program
Washington State Department of Ecology
Mail Stop PV-11
Olympia, WA 98504-8711
RE: Flood Control Assistance Account Program Interlocal Agreements
for City of Renton Projects
Dear Mr. Louthain:
Enclosed are two original copies of the grant agreements for the City of
Renton's Maplewood Creek Restoration and Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging
Flood Control Assistantce Account Program projects. These documents have
been signed by the King County Executive.
If there are questions about this material, please call Wendy Jackson, Claims
Analyst, Surface Water Management Finance and Billing Section, at 296-6573.
Sincerely,
Paul Tanaka
Acting Director
PT:WJ:ds c-1147
Enclosures
cc: Charles E. Price, P.E.
Jim Kramer, Manager, Surface Water Management Division
ATTN: Brad Miyake, Manager, Finance and Billing Section
Wendy Jackson, Claims Analyst
E� 41HIF
J UN 15 1988
CITY OF RENTON
Engineering Dept.
r
r—
r' • IV\ r U w
dZt Sto-�)q-- -
f
4% a)
7 MIL
R
Earl Clymer, Mayor
June 14, 1988
Robert E. Bergstrom, P.E.
Public Works Department
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
CITY OF RENTON
BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
Ronald G. Nelson, Director
RE: City of Renton, Public Works Department
Located within the lower Cedar River Basin at Maplewood Golf Course
ECF-035-88; SM-035-88
Dear Mr. Bergstrom:
Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Determination of Non -Significance for the above
referenced project.
If you have any questions, please call me at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Donald K. Erickson, AICP
Zoning Administrator
Enclosure
DKE:sr:cs
It
2�429'y M
Puri 16 1988
CITY OF RENTON
Engineering Dept.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540
CITY OF RENTON
DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.:
APPLICATION NO(s).:
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
PROPONENT:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:
LEAD AGENCY:
ECF-035-88
SM-035-88
Application for environmental review and Shoreline
Master permit to construct drainage improvements to an
unnamed tributary, referred to as Maplewood Creek,
situated in the Cedar River Basin.
City of Renton, Department of Public Works
Maplewood Creek is located within the lower Cedar
River Basin and passes through the Maplewood Golf
Course. The Golf Course is located at 4000 Maple
Valley Highway.
City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department.
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of an expanded environmental checklist and
preliminary site plan, on file with the lead agency.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee
City of Renton
200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055
Phone: 235-2550
APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than
June 27, 1988.
You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and
Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
DATE OF DECISION: June 8, 1988
PUBLICATION DATE: June 13, 1988
Ro ald elson
Building and Zoning Director
Ric and C. ughton
Public Works Director
0000000000B
��
MAL
4%R
Earl Clymer, Mayor
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
June 9, 1988
TO: Don Erickson
FROM: Chuck Price
SUBJECT: Maplewood Creek Restoration
Design/Utility Engineering
Jeannette has requested clarification on the method of construction for the
creek diversion through the park. The creek will be allowed to flow through
the existing route while the diverted route is constructed. Upon completion
the course of water will be changed through the new route directly into the
Cedar River. This will allow construction in dewatered conditions and have
less of an impact on the creeks resources. All construction methods will be
approved by the Department of Fisheries.
CP:jw
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
do
`' �7R
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 2, 1988
TO: Building and Zoning
FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor
SUBJECT: TERC Comments
South Talbot Hill Reservoir Project
Maplewood Golf Course - Seattle Watermain
As requested, the following are my responses to committee comments:
Maplewood Creek Rehabilitation: The creek relocation work will not cross
nor affect the Seattle Water Department facility. This new work lies over
1000 feet east of the Seattle Water Department Mercer Island Pipeline.
Please see attached map.
South Talbot Hill Reservoir: The South Talbot Hill project is made up of
the following work task elements:
1. Purchase of site from Covenant Church sale contract conditioned upon
annexation of church site and City site to Renton.
2. First Phase - Construct 16" water transmission main and overflow pipe
from Carr Rd. and 177th St. to reservoir site - rough grade site -
construct access road to site.
3. Second Phase - Construct reservoir and site improvements.
4. Third Phase - Covenant Church will construct 103rd St. to full urban
standards, i.e. curb, gutter, sidewalks, paved street, utilities,
lighting, etc.
I believe we need environmental review to cover all four work tasks.
I hope this answers your questions.
1D.10.11.REB:mf
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
May 20, 1988
0046E/HK:lt
INTRODUCED BY: Bruce Lain,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
MOTION IJO.
PROPOSED NO.
7199
88-345
A MOTION authorizing the King County Executive to
enter into agreements with the Washington State
Department of Ecology and the City of Renton
regarding the joint funding by state and local
governments for the maintenance of flood control
projects pursuant to RCW 86.26.
WHEREAS, the State of Washington, pursuant to RCII 86.26, has
established a state and local participating flood control
maintenance policy, and
WHEREAS, RCW 86.26.007 establishes an assistance account to
fund maintenance of eligible flood control projects to be
administered by the Washington State Department of Ecology, and
WHEREAS, King County, the Department of Ecology and the City
of Renton have negotiated and reached agreement on the maintenance
projects in the City of Renton eligible for state funding, and
WHEREAS, the Department of Ecology will reimburse King County
for up to fifty percent of the total eligible project maintenance
costs as set forth under the provisions of RCW 86.25.100, and
WHEREAS, reimbursement of maintenance costs requires formal
interagency agreements between King County and the recipient
agency pursuant to RCW 86.26.100 and WAC 173-145-070;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County:
The county executive is hereby authorized to enter into
interlocal agreements with the City of Renton and the Washington
State Department of Ecology regarding the financing of maintenance
on flood control projects in substantially the same form as the
agreement attached to this motion and incorporated herein by
reference.
PASSED this 3% day of 1966
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHI14GTON
C half r
ATTEST:
Cl,t!5—r'l of the Counc
CITY OF PeNTON
ON INK
O CITY CLEFS Oii10E
�- D
1E �L Ivy
"N
a
May 20, 1988
0046F/HK:lt
INTRODUCES Y: Bruce Lainc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
PROPOSED NO.:
MOTION NO.7199
88-345
A MOTION authorizing the King County Executive to
enter into agreements with the Washington State
Department of Ecology and the City of Renton
regarding the joint funding by state and local
governments for the maintenance of flood control
projects pursuant to RCW 86.26.
WHEREAS, the State of Washington, pursuant to RCW 86.26, has
established a state and local participating flood control
maintenance policy, and
WHEREAS, RCW 86.26.007 establishes an assistance account to
fund maintenance of eligible flood control projects to be
administered by the Washington State Department of Ecology, and
WHEREAS, King County, the Department of Ecology and the City
of Renton have negotiated and reached agreement on the maintenance
projects in the City of Renton eligible for state funding, and
WHEREAS, the Department of Ecology will reimburse King County
for up to fifty percent of the total eligible project maintenance
costs as set forth under the provisions of RCW 86.25.100, and
WHEREAS, reimbursement of maintenance costs requires formal
interagency agreements between King County and the recipient
agency pursuant to RCW 86.26.100 and WAC 173-145-070;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County:
The county executive is hereby authorized to enter into
interlocal agreements with the City of Renton and the Washington
State Department of Ecology regarding the financing of maintenance
on flood control projects in substantially the same form as the
greement attached to this motion and incorporated herein by
reference.
PASSED this day of 7L�� , 1 9 is
KING COUNTY COUNCIL
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Cha r
ATTEST:
of the Counc
CITY Or "�NTON
QUN �
O CITY CLEPK's
CEOFTICE
- D
I��
..li
Earl Clymer, Mayor
Mr. Jerry Louthain
Washington State
Department of Ecology
Mail Stop PV-I1
Olympia, WA 98504-8711
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
May 26, 1988
Subject: Maplewood Creek Restoration FCAAP Funds
Dear Jerry:
Design/Utility Engineering
I am requesting permission from the Department of Ecology to proceed with the
Maplewood Creek Restoration project prior to the actual execution of the agreement. It
is a lengthy process in developing the agreement between the City of Renton and King
County and obtaining authorizations for signature.
This agreement between the City of Renton and King County has been signed by the
City and is now at King County going through the process for approval. Following
approval of the agreement with the City of Renton, King County and the Department of
Ecology will need to execute the agreement between themselves which will further
postpone the City of Renton's ability to work on the project. It will be over a year into
the Department of Ecology's 2-year biennium before we are authorized to proceed with
the project.
The following is a list of significant dates with respect to the Maplewood Creek
Restoration project. These dates seem to be typical of the time frame resulting from the
standard procedure:
July 1, 1987
-Start of Biennium
February 1988
-King County receives agreement from the
Department of Ecology
February 26, 1988
-King County sends a draft agreement between
King County and City of Renton for review
(separate from Department of Ecology agreement)
March 21, 1988
-Amended agreement is processed through City of
Renton Council, to the Utilities Committee, and
then back to Council. Council passes resolution
authorizing the City Clerk and Mayor to execute
the agreement.
April 7, 1988
-Mayor and City Clerk execute agreement which is
then transmitted to King County.
(Unknown)
-King County and the Department of Ecology
execute agreement between themselves.
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
Mr. Jerry Louthain
May 26, 1988
Page 2
This project, as most of our projects, is constrained by the Department of Fisheries as to
the time of construction in the creek. We are therefore requesting permission to proceed
prior to execution so that we may be able to accomplish some of the work late this
summer and, hopefully, complete the work prior to the end of the DOE biennium in
June of 1989.
In addition, I encourage DOE to change the procedure for the next biennium. With any
project subject to Department of Fisheries regulations, the present procedure only allows
every other year to carry out any construction. With the biennium starting July 1, in
conjunction with the length of time required to process the agreements, it only allows
construction within the waterways in the follow construction year during July and
August. By the time the next July comes around, the biennium is over.
I would like to see the procedure changed so that Cities could deal directly with the
Department of Ecology. This will save time and eliminate some of the unnecessary
administration time that is now burdened on King County. I would also like to have the
funds carried forward into the next biennium for that construction work which is
already in progress. This will allow use of the following July and August construction
season in the waterways.
The present procedure, as it is today, is working against us and making the intent of the
funds and ability to use them ineffective. Again, I encourage any effort to implement
positive changes to the program in the future.
Very truly yours
Charles E. Price, P.E.
Storm Water Utility Engineer
cl/fcaapchg/cep: jlm
CC: Jim Kramer
King County
to
�-- CITY OF RENTON
"LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering
May 24, 1988
Ms. Wendy Jackson
701 Dexter Horton Bldg.
710 Second Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
Subject: Maplewood Creek Restoration, FCAAP Funds Contract
Dear Wendy:
Attached you will find two (2) copies of Exhibit No. 1 of the Maplewood Creek
Restoration, FCAAP Funds Contract. As requested, these copies have been approved
and initialed by the appropriate staff members.
Please continue processing the contract and send us a fully executed copy for our
records. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Charles E. Price, P.E.
Storm Water Utility Engineer
cl/trsmplwd
Attachements
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
40
}:
Earl Clymer, Mayor
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Richard C. Houghton, Director
May 23, 19881
MA r 2 1988
TO: Earl Clymer, Mayor
FROM: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Maplewood Creek Restoration, FCAAP Funds
Dear Mayor Clymer:
Exhibit No. 1 of the agreement between King County and the City of
Renton has a typing error in the percentage of funding to be received.
The grant covers 40% not 509,6 of the project costs.
King County staff returned the exhibit to the agreement which has already
been signed and asked that you initial and date the change prior to
execution by their appropriate staff member(s). The funds are availble
and 40%b matching funds are what we anticipated.
C P:
Attachment
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569
MAL
Earl Clymer, Mayor
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Richard C. Houghton, Director
May 23, 19881
11At L ime
TO: Earl Clymer, Mayor
FROM: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Maplewood Creek Restoration, FCAAP Funds
Dear Mayor Clymer:
Exhibit No. 1 of the agreement between King County and the City of
Renton has a typing error in the percentage of funding to be received.
The grant covers 40% not 50% of the project costs.
King County staff returned the exhibit to the agreement which has already
been signed and asked that you initial and date the change prior to
execution by their appropriate staff member(s). The funds are availble
and 40% matching funds are what we anticipated.
C P:
Attachment
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569
EXHIBIT NO. I
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The County's responsibilities under this agreement shall be limited to passing
through to the City any available State funding for the project and fulfilling
any further administrative duties required by statute, as set forth below.
A. Project Administration and Execution
1. The City will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents,
obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to the County for tech-
nical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval,
award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management,
prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all
project documentation as regarded by law and by the Washington State
Department of Ecology Grant Agreement No. G0088115, hereinafter, the
"Grant Agreement" and which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The grant agreement is administered by the Washington State Department
of Ecology, hereinafter referred to as the"Department".
2. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded
through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law.
No contract shall be awarded until approved in writing by the County.
The City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for
inspection and use by the County or the Department.
3. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing
appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency.
The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, construction management and any additional work required
to furnish a complete project. The County shall be responsible for
project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure
all work is done according to plans and specifications, and for final
project inspection in cooperation with the City and the Department.
4. This project will be designed and constructed in accordance with
applicable provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and Chapter 173-145 WAC.
The construction shall conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Department.
Payments toward construction will not be made until the plans and
specifications have been approved by the Department.
5. Within thirty (30) days after the award of the construction contract,
the City will submit to the Department a copy of the actual construc-
tion schedule, by month, for the entire construction period. If the
City fails to follow the construction schedule or does not receive
written approval from the contract officer to deviate from the sche-
dule, the Department and the County may terminate the grant for cause
as provided in Section D., herein.
6. The City will obtain any permits required for the project.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Two
7. The County, as signator with the Department on the grant agreement,
and the City as the lead agency for design construction, construction
management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the Grant
Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant
reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn pre-
sent to the Department for reimbursement to the City.
B., Payment of Grant Funds to City
1. When the City's actual costs exceed that major project element's
estimated total eligible cost described in Exhibit II by more than
ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County and
the Department, reimbursement for excess costs will be disallowed.
I�Cl The County will not provide remittance in excess of the County's share
jr.,-,4-y w o) of the total eligible project cost. The County's share shall not
exceed3f-i€ty--(60) percent of the total eligible project cost of
$63,510 in cash, including Washington State Sales tax, where appli-
cable.
2. Requests for payment of eligible funds will be submitted by the City
on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher
shall be submitted to the County along with information which docu-
ments the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of
the project. The voucher request form and supportive documents must
itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in Exhibit
II. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form
and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit III.
In this guideline, the words "CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE" refer to the City
and "DEPARTMENT" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology
which administers the Flood Control Assistance Account Program.
Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to:
Surface Water Management Division
King County Department of Public Works
710 Second Avenue, Suite 730
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Brad Miyake
3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more
often than monthly on a reimbursable basis.
4. All payments are conditioned upon submission to the County of the
above -mentioned itemized state voucher request form, certified by the
City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services
performed within the effective dates of this agreement unless a writ-
ten modification is obtained. C
-f-c- - (qc) V ,
5. The County shall remit to the City for f4*ty—(54) percent of the total
eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit II except for the amount
withheld as security for City's performance as specified in Section
B.6.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Three
6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be with-
held by the Department as security for City's performance.
Monies withheld by the Department as security under the provisions of
this paragraph will be paid to the City upon completion of the project
described in Exhibit II and final approval by the Department, or upon
completion and approval of portions thereof.
7. When voucher requests are approved by the County and the Department,
payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee.
8. The City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty
(30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in
Exhibit II.
9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County
and/or the Department and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be
refunded to the County by the City.
C. Indemnification
1. The County shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,
consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project
described herein, except as provided in Section A of this agreement.
2. To the extent the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington
permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any
claim of liability arising out of the project described in this
agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained.
D. Termination for Cause
The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory
performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In
the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this
agreement, the County may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder
and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination.
A notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior to the effective date
of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or
other materials prepared by the City under this agreement, at the option
of the County, shall become its property, and the City shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
E. Effective Date and Time for Performance
The effective date of this agreement shall be the date the Grant Agreement
is signed by the Department. Any work performed prior to the effective
date of this agreement will be at the sole expense and risk of the City.
This agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1989.
EXHIBIT NO. I
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The County's responsibilities under this agreement shall be limited to passing
through to the City any available State funding for the project and fulfilling
any further administrative duties required by statute, as set forth below.
A. Proiect Administration and Execution
1. The City will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents,
obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to the County for tech-
nical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval,
award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management,
prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all
project documentation as regarded by law and by the Washington State
Department of Ecology Grant Agreement No. G0088115, hereinafter, the
"Grant Agreement" and which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The grant agreement is administered by the Washington State Department
of Ecology, hereinafter referred to as the"Department".
2. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded
through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law.
No contract shall be awarded until approved in writing by the County.
The City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for
inspection and use by the County or the Department.
3. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing
appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency.
The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, construction management and any additional work required
to furnish a complete project. The County shall be responsible for
project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure
all work is done according to plans and specifications, and for final
project inspection in cooperation with the City and the Department.
4. This project will be designed and constructed in accordance with
applicable provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and Chapter 173-145 WAC.
The construction shall conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Department.
Payments toward construction will not be made until the plans and
specifications have been approved by the Department.
5. Within thirty (30) days after the award of the construction contract,
the City will submit to the Department a copy of the actual construc-
tion schedule, by month, for the entire construction period. If the
City fails to follow the construction schedule or does not receive
written approval from the contract officer to deviate from the sche-
dule, the Department and the County may terminate the grant for cause
as provided in Section D., herein.
6. The City will obtain any permits required for the project.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Two
7. The County, as signator with the Department on the grant agreement,
and the City as the lead agency for design construction, construction
management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the Grant
Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant
reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn pre-
sent to the Department for reimbursement to the City.
B. Payment of Grant Funds to City project Y J P
i�When the Cit 's actual costs exceed that major 'ect element's
•
estimated total eligible cost described in Exhibit II by more than
VV ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County and
the Department, reimbursement for excess costs will be disallowed.
The County will not provide remittance in excess of the County s share
(� o) of the total eligible project cost. The County's share shall not
`--1 exceed percent of the total eligible project cost of
$63,510 in cash, including Washington State Sales tax, where appli-
cable.
2. Requests for payment of eligible funds will be submitted by the City
on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher
shall be submitted to the County along with information which docu-
ments the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of
the project. The voucher request form and supportive documents must
itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in Exhibit
II. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form
and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit III.
In this guideline, the words "CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE" refer to the City
and "DEPARTMENT" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology
which administers the Flood Control Assistance Account Program.
Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to:
Surface Water Management Division
King County Department of Public Works
710 Second Avenue, Suite 730
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Brad Miyake
3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more
often than monthly on a reimbursable basis.
4. All payments are conditioned upon submission to the County of the
above -mentioned itemized state voucher request form, certified by the
City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services
performed within the effective dates of this agreement unless a writ-
ten modification is obtained. (y�',
�'1.��_/ ( lie) W tL
5. The County shall remit to the City for f-i-f-t-y45O)- percent of the total
eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit II except for the amount
withheld as security for City's performance as specified in Section
B.6.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Three
6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be with-
held by the Department as security for City's performance.
Monies withheld by the Department as security under the provisions of
this paragraph will be paid to the City upon completion of the project
described in Exhibit II and final approval by the Department, or upon
completion and approval of portions thereof.
7. When voucher requests are approved by the County and the Department,
payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee.
8. The City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty
(30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in
Exhibit II.
9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County
and/or the Department and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be
refunded to the County by the City.
C. Indemnification
1. The County shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,
consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project
described herein, except as provided in Section A of this agreement.
2. To the extent the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington
permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any
claim of liability arising out of the project described in this
agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained.
D. Termination for Cause
The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory
performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In
the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this
agreement, the County may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder
and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination.
A notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior to the effective date
of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or
other materials prepared by the City under this agreement, at the option
of the County, shall become its property, and the City shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
E. Effective Date and Time for Performance
The effective date of this agreement shall be the date the Grant Agreement
is signed by the Department. Any work performed prior to the effective
date of this agreement will be at the sole expense and risk of the City.
This agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1989.
� MLL
6R
Earl Clymer, Mayor
,
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Design/Utility Engineering
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 20, 1988
TO: Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Dept.
FROM: Robert E. Bergstrom, Engineering Dept.
SUBJECT: Storm Drainage Comprehensive Plan
Consultant Services Interview
Chuck Price and I have finished the review of the written submittals by
consultants for the City 1987 Storm Drainage Comprehensive Plan advertisement.
From the 81 submittals, we have narrowed to four firms for in -person
interviews:
David Evens & Associates (DEA)
Parametrix
Consoer, Townsend & Associates--
CH2M Hill
Your approval is requested to begin with in -person interviews. Our proposed
progress on the comp plan will not be a big showy comp plan.
There are some key drainage basins with considerable development pressure and
others with chronic maintenance problems, and still much of the storm system
has not yet been as -built and inventoried. The 1988 Comprehensive Plan effort
will be to develop drainage basin plans (similar to the May Creek Study) on
some critical basins. At some later date they can be combined into an overall
product.
i J
Robert Bergstrom
Approval
2D.17.10.10/REB:ckd
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
Qc,�GfC, i(r
Raymond A. Griffin
14306 144th Ave. S. E.
Renton, Washington 98056
(206) 228-5673
April 29, 1988
Building and Zoning Department
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: R2919 Substantial development permit in Maplewood Creek
(Storm Water Utility request)
Dear Sirs:
Please put me on your list as a party of record regarding stream
#8.0302. (Maplewood Creek).
I am very concerned with any drainage that is dumped into the creek
since this is a fish bearing body of water which runs through some very
fragile and sensitive areas. Any increase in flow, duration of flow, or
turbidity only hastens erosion, land slides, and siltation. You have un-
doubtedly already found that the rate of your discharge into the upper
reaches of the stream is scouring the stream bed and filling the ponding
area above your dam with silt and gravel.
I implore you to consider putting all of your storm waters from this
drainage basin into a tightline and running it to Honey Creek. I would
remind you that at the present time you are diverting waters from another
basin into Maplewood Creek so the precedent is already set by the city to
divert waters from one drainage basin to another. Storm waters from roads
and parking lots contain heavy metals, oil, rubber, and all kinds of
poisons from herbicides and chemicals that people put on their roofs and
driveways. These are all things that kill fish and wildlife in and around
waterways.
We must do all we can now to preserve the habitat of this dedicated
greenbelt for the use of future residents in this area.
I would also like to see the golf course remove the barriers that
keep fish from getting to the upper reaches of the creek from the Cedar
River. We would be happy to contribute both money and labor toward that
end, in fact, Metro would probably give us a grant to rehabilitate the
stream.
If the above ideas appeal to you, please let me know and let us
work together.
Yours truly,
1<7
aymond A. Griffin
11aaaw1m
IdAY 31986
CITY OF RENTON
Engineering Dept.
CITY OF RENTON
; PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7R
Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 20, 1988
TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk
FROM: Charles Price, Storm Water Utility Engineer
SUBJECT: Publication of Shorline Application for Maplewood Creek
Dear Maxine:
Please publish the attached Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Substantial Development
Permit for Maplewood Creek.
Thank you for your assistance.
Charles Price
cm/pubmpl/cep: jlm
Attachment
CC: Jerry Lind, Building & Zoning
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
A
i986Z
SHORELINE APPLICATION
NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Notice is hereby given that The City of Renton, Public Works Department
Storm Water Division
has filed an application for a
substantial development permit for the construction or development of
Drainage improvements to an unnamed tributary referred to as Maplewood Creek.
The creek is located within the lower Cedar River Basin and passes through
Maplewood Golf course.
located at:
within Section(s) 10,15,21,22 of Township
the City of Renton, King County, Washington
be within the Cedar River
23 N, Range 5 W.M., in
Said development is proposed to
and/or its associated wetlands.
Any person desiring to express his views or to be notified of the action
taken on this application should notify the Building and Zoning Department,
Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington 98055 in
writing of his interest within thirty (30) days of the last publication of
this notice. Publication dates of this notice are
and
City of Renton
Building and Zoning Department
10-85
4iR
CITY OF RENTON
"'LL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Design/Utility Engineering
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 14, 1988
TO: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator
FROM: Charles Price, Storm Water Utility Engineer
SUBJECT: Maplewood Creek Restoration Project
Environmental Checklist
Dear Don:
Please find enclosed 6 copies of the Environmental Checklist, project plans, and narrative for the
Maplewood Creek Restoration Project.
Charles E. Price`
cm/mplderic/cep:jlm
Attachments: 8 Sets
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
Maplewood Creek Restoration
This restoration project is to mitigate flood damage to Maplewood Creek caused by
heavy erosion and sedimentation. The study will calculate possible ways to reduce flows,
bank stabilization, and creek realignment.
A realignment into the Cedar River will illuminate the culvert structure under SR 169,
which becomes plugged, and it will also enhance fisheries.
We will be working with the Department of Fisheries in the ralignment. Access to the
creek will be increased which will provide more suitable spawning areas.
The realignment is also part of the City of Renton Parks Department Master Remodeling
Plan for the golf course. The master plan includes ponds and other amenities to enhance
the park.
Land uses within the basin include parks, residential, and commercial adjacent to the
Creek as it extends up the basin. Within the 200 ft. area, the land use is Parks. A
current zoning plan is attached for the area.
SHEET NO. 11
KING COUNTY AREA, WASHINGTON
(RENTON QUADRANGLE)
N,.1 10 1680000 FEET 122007'30'?
Fj
lit
4I •A i
•T►ailfr r t .*` ■: x.EvB�i. r �j
• • .wit n B uBM
,�� :-1-- i �• n •3 3 •• 4241
T-i " _.. ...**c.�', ti fie' •r.• .; 546
raanwood Ce' ." li ... l i • s r 4 •'> 7 i
180000
--=al+ j ' • •, •_�AgC 3 _ ti a, i!'t,r11„I �•�r �' „� • ^;:., • FEET
An
F Is
kI
M,
am
EvB
�p �,�• � • _i..—.r,�,. � J�—r>t:a>Ra fad
IEva
• I a� � V AkF I • r
• A �� �.Kit
• ?� •.•1, • 1"'� t �r Rh I e PY ', M AkF O 1 I S o
�'y Pc n C
ap ••�/ ��,• ,`u M Ap d pNR I• v• •Py M� W
f �.r A k IF
t l - �1 •• a � I17• �n •nrEl lot pC• •Rf, W
py
AkF p r �I Ur Pr
� SP � w• . N i
\•Orr I A6C •� AkF ' r Park ) B � PY
r ' a
\mil 1. EvC �C.
- .•• r a r� � 7 ��i. .:� is •.,�T t
1 - - -• BMbBM 27'30„
4,428
Ag
AQB `t TB Aker . _ :L _ P,PELNvf_. AQC:
�= U r' • .
4921
'o
y �, k
�U
� R •���,
OF 1?4
z
o �
City of Renton
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
TFD SEPIe4e
Purpose of Checklist:
ECF:
LU:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),
the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Maplewood Creek Restoration
2. Name of applicant:
City of Renton, Department of Public Works
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
City of Renton Charles E. Price, P.E.
Municipal Building Storm Water Utility Engineer
200 Mill Avenue South (206) 235-2631
Renton, WA 98055
4. Date checklist prepared:
February 25, 1988
S. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Design: March 1988 to June 1988
Construction: June 1988, September 1988
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related
to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain.
Basin Design Study will also be addressed.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
None
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain.
RC
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
Department of Fisheries Hydraulic Permit
City of Renton, Council Approval
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page. Maplewood Creek extends through the Maplewood Golf
Course and under the Maple Valley Highway. The flood project will mitigate flood damage to Maplewo(
Creek, Maplewood Golf Course, Maple Valley Highway, and to residential subdivisions on the south
side of the highway.
The scope of work involves engineering and construction for the removal of gravel and sediments in
the channel and settling basins in order to restore capacity and prevent downstream facility plug-
ging. Stabilization of existing banks with rock rip rap and checkdams is also necessary for the prc
tection against further erosion. Realignment of the Creek into the Cedar River to enhance fisheries
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
The Creek is located through the Maplewood Golf Course on the north side of
the Maple Valley Highway. Major improvements will be located within the Golf
Course with some enhancements and erosion protection upstream. The design
study will select actual measures along the creek to enhance the project and
alleviate erosion.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Topography map show steepest creek banks 125%
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Predominantly Alderwood gravelly sands with 6 to 15% slopes (AgC)
some areas of very steep areas of Alderwood & Kitsap soils (AKF).
d. Are there Sur#�ace indicationssor �iist�oryy ofuSnsftluile sol i� iPrrrhediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
Heavy Creek erosion apparent,
-2-
i
e. Describe the purpose, type. and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Excavation and dredging of approximately 1000 c.y.
Rip rapping approximately 1500 c.y. for erosion protection.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing. construction. or use? If so.
generally describe.
Yes, erosion already occurs and clearing would increase it.
Construction activities and time of construction will reduce the
potential. The final product should decrease the erosion.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Negligible, some wiers may be installed made of concrete or rock.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
Construction during summer months. Temporary erosion control measures
in conformance with best management practices.
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
During construction, dust and construction equipment.
After construction - no emissions.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emission?
Vehicular transportation during construction only.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
None
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes. ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
Maplewood Creek/Cedar River
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes, dredging improvements in Maplewood Creek with new alignment
proposed for outlet into the Cedar River.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
See item 1-E Above.
Work would occur in Maplewood Creek and at connection to Cedar River.
- 3 -
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known.
Potential diversion of outlet into Cedar River required.
S) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site zlan.
Known location of the 100 year flood plain is shown on site and soils
plan attached. Limits are not known outside the City limits. The new
connection into the Cedar River would be the only area within the limits.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
Mbscharge.
No
b. Grounti
1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if
known.
No
2) Descrne waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industr al, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
N/A
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Runoff is from Basin into Maplewood Creek which flows into the Cedar
River.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
Spill from construction equipment.
-4-
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
impacts, if any:
Project is to enhance negative impacts which already exist.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
■ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
• evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
■ Shrubs
■ grass
o crop or grain
o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
• water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
o other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Minor removal anticipated for slope stabilization of trees and shrubs.
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site. if any:
None
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, EEErds other
Mammals: er bear elk, beaver, other
Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No
-5-
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any:
Diversion of Maplweood Creek into the Cedar will enhance Fisheries.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating. manufacturing, etc.
N/A
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
No
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
N/A
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards. including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
The only hazard would be an oil or gas spill from any equipment during
construction.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Confine spill, excavate soils and haul away,
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
None
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
None
ME
2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction. operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
Short term: construction equipment during construction.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None
B. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Golf Course, Commercial, and Residential areas.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so. describe.
No
C. Describe any structures on the site.
N/A
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
N/A
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
N/A
g. If applicable. what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site? Currently not within the City limits, but it is being annexed
and would most likely be given an urban designation.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
N/A
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
-7-
k
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
Hydrologic design will consider existing and proposed land uses.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
N/A
b. Approximately how many units. if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
N/A
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s). not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
N/A
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
N/A
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. if any:
N/A
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
N/A
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
N/A
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
N/A
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A
��
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
Maplewood Golf Course, Fisheries enhancement and Public awareness
opportunity.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
Diversion would be consistant with Golf Course plans.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant. if any:
None
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
No
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific. or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
N/A
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans. if any.
Maple Valley Highway, and NE 4th Street and Bremerton Place NE, at
upper end of basin.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
N/A
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
N/A
d. Will the proposal require any rew roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
Potential for culvert improvements under roadways.
—9—
+ S. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
091
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
N/A
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
N/A
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection. police protection, health care, schools, other)?
If so, generally describe.
[a
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any.
None
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
N/A
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or
in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Storm Water Utility Improvements in open channel flow.
C. SIGNATURE
1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed: Charles E. Price, P.E.
Storm Water Utility Engineer
- 10-
#176 11-8-84
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(This sheet should only be used for actions Involving decisions on policies, plans and
Programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.)
Because these questions are very
conjunction with the list of the elements general.
eof lthetenvironment.ybe 1pful to read them in
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types
Of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater
Intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond
briefly and in general terms.
I. How would the proposal be likely to Increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production. storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of
noise?
Would not increase discharge to water but would control it.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
N/A
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants. animals. fish. or marine life?
Enhance fisheries by providing spawning areas and access.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants. animals, fish, or marine life are:
Design and construction improvements to enhance.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Not likely.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
N/A
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas
or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such
as parks. wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species
habitat. historic or cultural sites. wetlands. floodplains. or prime farmlands?
Use creek relocation in Park design.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
None
S. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use. including
whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
The control of erosion should enhance the land and shorelines.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Control erosion.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
It may increase popularity of Golf Course with the fisheries enhancement.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
None
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state. or federal
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
None
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed: Charles E. Price, P.E.
Storm Water Utility
-12-
U �'�i► '-�- Z
Z �
o =�
City of Renton
�%gTFO SEP'TE'4e ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist:
ECF:
LU:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making
decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals
with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose
of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts
from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your
proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly. with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does
not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations. such as zoning, shoreline, and
landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the
governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal. even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide
additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impacts.
Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly)
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be
answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION. complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR
NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs),
the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant." and "property or site"
should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Maplewood Creek Restoration
2. Name of applicant:
City of Renton, Department of Public Works
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
City of Renton Charles E. Price, P.E.
Municipal Building Storm Water Utility Engineer
200 Mill Avenue South (206) 235-2631
Renton, WA 98055
4. Date checklist prepared:
February 25, 1988
S. Agency requesting checklist:
City of Renton
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Design: March 1988 to June 1988
Construction: June 1988, September 1988
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related
to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain.
Basin Design Study will also be addressed.
e. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
None
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No
10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,
if known.
Department of Fisheries Hydraulic Permit
City of Renton, Council Approval
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and
the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist
that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page. Maplewood Creek extends through the Maplewood Golf
Course and under the Maple Valley Highway. The flood project will mitigate flood damage to Maplewoc
Creek, Maplewood Golf Course, Maple Valley Highway, and to residential subdivisions on the south
side of the highway.
The scope of work involves engineering and construction for the removal of gravel and sediments in
the channel and settling basins in order to restore capacity and prevent downstream facility plug-
ging. Stabilization of existing banks with rock rip rap and checkdams is also necessary for the pro
tection against further erosion. Realignment of the Creek into the Cedar River to enhance fisheries
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and
section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you
should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate
maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
The Creek is located through the Maplewood Golf Course on the north side of
the Maple Valley Highway. Major improvements will be located within the Golf
Course with some enhancements and erosion protection upstream. The design
study will select actual measures along the creek to enhance the project and
alleviate erosion.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. EARTH
a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep
slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Topography map show steepest creek banks 125%
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know, the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Predominantly Alderwood gravelly sands with 6 to 15% slopes (AgC)
some areas of very steep areas of Alderwood & Kitsap soils (AKF).
Lowland area in .Go�1f Course �f tPuyal u ft' Sa vi (P") diate
d. Are there sur ace in ications or is orY o Sns STe sol i `�� 11
vicinity? If so, describe.
Heavy Creek erosion apparent,
-2-
G
2.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
Excavation and dredging of approximately 1000 c.y.
Rip rapping approximately 1500 c.y. for erosion protection.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
Yes, erosion already occurs and clearing would increase it.
Construction activities and time of construction will reduce the
potential. The final product should decrease the erosion.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
Negligible, some wiers may be installed made of concrete or rock.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
Construction during summer months. Temporary erosion control measures
in conformance with best management practices.
AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and
when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give
approximate quantities if known.
During construction, dust and construction equipment.
After construction - no emissions.
b. Are there any off -site sources of emission?
Vehicular transportation during construction only.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,
if any:
None
3. WATER
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site
(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,
wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state
what stream or river it flows into.
2)
3)
Maplewood Creek/Cedar River
Will the project require any work over. in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)
the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes, dredging improvements in Maplewood Creek with new alignment
proposed for outlet into'the Cedar River.
Estimate the amount of fill sand dredge material that would be placed in or
removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
See item 1-E Above.
Work would occur in Mapl wood Creek and at connection to Cedar River.
-3-
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description, purpose. and approximately quantities if known.
Potential diversion of outlet into Cedar River required.
S) Does thr proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on
the site clan.
Known location of the 100 year flood plain is shown on site and soils
plan attached. Limits are not known outside the City limits. The new
connection into the Cedar River would be the only area within the limits.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of
Vbscharge.
[Me
b. Grourik
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground
water? Give general description, purpose. and appaoximately quantities if
known.
iIn
2) Desc, waste material that will be discharged into the ground from
septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industral. containing the following chemicals . . agricultural; etc.).
Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable). or the number of animals or
humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
ra/A
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
Runoff is from Basin into Maplewood Creek which flows into the Cedar
River.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
Spill from construction equipment.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground. and runoff water
impacts. if any:
Project is to enhance negative impacts which already exist.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
■ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen. other
a evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine. other
■ Shrubs
■ grass
o crop or grain
o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other
0 other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Minor removal anticipated for slope stabilization of trees and shrubs.
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetation on the site. if any:
None
S. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site
or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, En birds other
Mammals: ier bear elk, beaver, other
Fish: bass. sa mon, trout. herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No
—S—
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any:
Diversion of Maplweood Creek into the Cedar will enhance Fisheries.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it
will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
N/A
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe.
No
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this
proposal? list other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
N/A
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste. that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
The only hazard would be an oil or gas spill from any equipment during
construction.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Confine spill, excavate soils and haul away.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if
any:
None
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
None
-6-
2) What types and levals of noise would be created by or associated with the
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come
from the site.
Short term: construction equipment during construction.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Golf Course, Commercial, and Residential areas.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No
C. Describe any structures on the site.
N/A
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
N/A
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
N/A
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the Site? Currently not within the City limits, but it is being annexed
and would most likely be given an urban designation.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, specify.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
N/A
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A
-7-
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans. if any:
Hydrologic design will consider existing and proposed land uses.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle. or low-income housing.
N/A
b. Approximately how many units, if any. would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
N/A
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas: what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed.
N/A
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
N/A
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
N/A
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
N/A
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or
interfere with views?
N/A
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
N/A
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A
-8-
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
Maplewood Golf Course, Fisheries enhancement and Public awareness
opportunity.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
Diversion would be consistant with Golf Course plans.
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
None
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national. state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
No
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
None
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any:
N/A
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Maple Valley Highway, and NE 4th Street and Bremerton Place NE, at
upper end of basin.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately
distance to the nearest transit stop?
N/A
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
N/A
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, not including driveways? if so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
Potential for culvert improvements under roadways.
—9—
r e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water. rail, or
air transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
N/A
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
N/A
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)?
If so, generally describe.
1'M
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any.
None
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas,
water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
N/A
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or
in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
Storm Water Utility Improvements in open channel flow.
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed: Charles E. Price, P.E.
Storm Water Utility Engineer
-10-
#176 11-8-84
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(This sheet should only be used for actions Involving decisions on policies, plans and
Programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.)
Because these questions are very
conjunction with the list of the elements of ]thetenvironment.ybe 1pful to read them in
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types
of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater
intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond
briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to Increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage. or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of
noise?
Would not increase discharge to water but would control it.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
N/A
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals. fish. or marine life?
Enhance fisheries by providing spawning areas and access.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals. fish, or marine life are:
Design and construction improvements to enhance.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Not likely.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
N/A
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas
or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such
as parks, wilderness. wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species
habitat, historic or cultural sites. wetlands. floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Use creek relocation in Park design,
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
None
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including
whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
The control of erosion should enhance the land and shorelines.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Control erosion.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
It may increase popularity of Golf Course with the fisheries enhancement.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
None
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local. state, or federal
laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
None
SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any
declaration of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist
should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on
my part.
Proponent:
Name Printed: Charles E. Price, P.E.
Storm Water Utility
-12-
'�ii `1 -1 •, --1 • I I 1 I r ,, a • t� -) H-1
1�
I( ` I t I S r • � .• • f
► jam, - I S __ - 1~ ,F' f R_' ) 14 (6 a� 4 a.vl 4i i,4 I
R~2
17
R-1 R-2
-- -- , I ,.'r5 r♦ rinra 1 ..r•' r 1 5 `I l ♦ � o '+ I
I �. � I I I I l:-l�y ). l •I t 1. � 1 e c �• . 'y ..�
� I -r- .IE •Lr.l 1 1 \<.1 5'' y �I ' n `Z � N „ctrpu
milk w
IJ I I I N E ,e" _Pl
1 j
II I R-1 ; R-i
I00
R-2 I I YL
3 5
�I
R�3 R_1 �
I I
� 1 ' I
1 �1 1 I'Illi•I I r B I � I
-
S I
_ _ I r
I
--- R-3
I �• i
r ,
I
I I
I I -
-- -
I I R!
F'pufl-- 055 6 l
IL-11 R-1 _
I 4 ,J Il
I
11 S ( I ``
e i
I I s l • • .`\
I I I f • �
i`o,r�,,,I�S p•,..I�.I,.,y�,1_lil E-i1 ••
' �''�`> /(fit � s r`'~ti' w y11)�)viC�" /�-�1t/j ♦ /� ��
6 1• 6
0
P-1
3e ST
•' SS y' S to
\t 7 7r ) 1 �I . hti� ♦ - .0
to
j �•c
'may
LAND USES
WITH IN 1000 FT.
CIR. _ - -_ � � •� I�I
Ir C�,, � �—�_ � , tip,•- 'i
�+ J � '� i� �� 1, � \.-�' �' . � ems,. �,�� 2 I � ►
Lu
ell
OF
........
:�,{ 1 � ��- ' 1 � •'�:
� � •I ~��-� � � _ � ' III
l o;1,41
i
r \ _
'f I
'.a � �/ � � ' i 1. A � � � .•
Ile
ol
d'
Q)
W
z�
o-° o
z Ib
LIJ
u_ o Q 3
O n- — o
C
C p °c
Q) N
E
O
•
1
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
SHORELINES MANAGEMENT
SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
APPLICATION/APPEAL PROCEDURE
EARLY CONSULTATION
Prior to submitting an application for a Shorelines Exemption from a Substantial
Development Permit, the applicant should informally discuss a proposed development with
the Building and Zoning Department. The Building and Zoning Department will provide
assistance and detailed information on the City's requirements and standards.
PROCEDURE:
The procedure for approval takes a minimum of 85 days and may take longer if additional
information is required of the applicant by city departments to make their
recommendations.
When the City of Renton Building and Zoning Department receives a complete
application for a Shoreline Management Exemption from a Substantial
Development Permit, then the applicant shall be required to publish notices of the
proposed action in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Renton (King
County). These notices shall be published at least once a week on the same day of
the week for two consecutive weeks. A notarized affidavit of publication shall be
provided by the applicant to the Building and Zoning Department. (NOTE: The
newspaper must supply this affidavit to the applicant.) Notice in the newspaper of
the proposed action allows all interested persons to submit their views within thirty
(30) days of the last date of publication and to receive a copy of the action taken
upon the application. All notices of applications for Shoreline Management
Exemption from a Substantial Development Permit shall be substantially in the
form as the example provided by the Building and Zoning Department.
2. The Building and Zoning Department determines approval or denial of the permit
after the comment period and after the SEPA threshold determination is made.
3. The Department of Ecology commences a thirty (30) day review period after
receiving the Administrator's decision during which appeals can be made.
4. If no appeals are filed, work on the project may commence after notification of the
end of the review period by DOE.
APPLICATION:
❑ 1. One (1) original plus six (6) copies of a complete application form and affidavits of
ownership together with any other pertinent information.
0 2. The application shall be accompanied by an application fee and an environmental
checklist fee determined as follows:
❑ Permit Fee:
$ 75 if value is less than $10,000
$150 if value is less than $50,000
$200 if value from $50,000 to $100,000
$250 plus .02% of value over $100,000
0 Environmental Checklist:
$55 if value less than $10,000
$60 plus $1 per $10,000 if value greater than $10,000
fey in the amcu,-. 1-:.'2 as the above listed lee may be assessed ii the
subject property is located in an environmentally sensitive area.
❑ 3. Copies of legal description for entire property.
0 4. Attachments to application form (original and 6 copies)
❑ A. Vicinity map: A scaled map showing the subject site in relation to all
properties at least 1,000 feet from the subject site.
If the proposed project involves removal of any soils by dredging or other
means, identify the proposed disposal site on the vicinity map. If disposal site
is outside the area indicated on the map, prepare another vicnity map showing
the precise location of the disposal site and its distance to the nearest city or
town.
❑ B. An Accurate . Plan That Includes: Detailed sca drawing or text sufficen}
to fully explain the intended project including:
❑ Site boundary and dimensions.
❑ Property dimensions in vicinity of project.
❑ Ordinary high-water mark (existing and proposed).
❑ Existing land contours using five (5) foot intervals in water area and ten (10)
foot intervals on areas landward of ordinary high-water mark.
❑ Proposed land contours using five (5) foot intervals in water area and ten
(10) foot intervals on areas landward of ordinary high-water mark, if
development involves grading, cutting, filling, or other alteration of land
contours.
❑ Typical cross section or sections showing:
o Existing and proposed ground elevations.
❑ Existing average grade level underneath and proposed structure.
❑ Height of existing and proposed structures.
❑ Dimensions and locations of existing structures which will be maintained and
proposed structures.
❑ Materials comprising proposed fill or extraction, if any.
❑ Amount of fill or extraction (in tons and cubic yards) and, if extraction,
disposal site.
❑ Location of proposed utilities, such as sewer, septic tanks and drainfields,
water, gas, electricity. (If the development allows septic tanks, depth of
the water table.)
❑ C. Project Narrative (8 copies):
❑ a. Provide a brief narrative description of the general nature of the
improvements and land uses within 1,000 feet in all directions from
the development site.
❑ b. If a variance is being requested, the application shall contain the
applicant's reasons why the variance should be granted.
❑ C. If a conditional use is being requested, the application shall contain
the applicant's explanation of why the conditional use should be
granted, including notation of any special features of the proposed
project that supports the request.
❑ D. Legal Notice Documents: Applicant must provide the Building & Zoning
Department with an affidavit stating notices in newspaper were published.
❑ E. Other Helpful Documents:
❑ a. Photographs
❑ b. Sketches, etc.
❑ F. Complete Environmental Checklist
❑ G. Submit one Super-K or PMT reduction of each sheet of plans submitted on
either 8-1/2" x 11" or 8-1/2" x 14." A Super-K reduction is a
photographic reduction on a type of mylar sheet. Xerox reductions are
not generally acceptable unless absolutely clear.
APPEAL PROCEDURE:
If permit is denied, applicant may appeal to Shoreline Hearings Board, as outlined below.
Appeal Initiated by Department of Ecology or Attorney General
1. Either the Department of Ecology or Attorney General may request review of the
granting or denying of a permit within thirty (30) days of the action of the Renton
Building and Zoning Department. Notice is sent to the Building and Zoning
Department and the Hearings Board.
2. The Hearings Board conducts a review as requested and accepts or overturns the
decision of the City of Renton.
3. Any part to the review may appeal the Hearings Board decision to Superior Court.
Appeal Initiated by the Applicant or by a Private Party
1. Any person, including the applicant, aggrieved by the granting or denying of a
permit may request an appeal. The request is sent to the Department of Ecology,
the Attorney General, and the Hearings Board.
2. Either the Department or the Attorney General must certify the request as valid
for the review to continue. Certification must be given within thirty (30) days.
3. If the request is certified, the Hearings Board conducts a review and sustains or
overturns the decision of the City of Renton.
4. Any party who fails to obtain certification or any party to a review before the
Hearings Board may appeal to Superior Court.
October 30, 1985/0883Z
204
0398Z
I
CITY OF RENTON
Building S Zoning Department
(206) 235-2550
SHORELINE MASTER APPLICATION
APPLICATION FOR:
OFFICE USE ONLY:
Application No.:
SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
ECF No.:
PERMIT
SEC-TWP-R•
_
CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
Date Approved:
VARIANCE
Date Denied:
Publication Date:
_
EXEMPTION
Comprehensive Plan:
REVISION
Zoning:
Water Body:
STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING
Date Received:
Application Received By:
Application Determined To Be:
o Accepted ❑ Incomplete
Notification Sent On:
By (Initials)•
Date Routed:
Additional Material Received by:
Application Determined To Be:
c Accepted o Incomplete
Notification Sent On:
By (Initials)•
In addition to the information below, the applicant should include a site
map and any other pertinent information which will assist in the review
of this application. The Building and Zoning Department reserves the
right to require additional information needed to evaluate the
application.
AppLICJINT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS I-10 THROUGH 14-16 BE -LAW.
INFORMATION:
1. Applicant Owner Purchaser
Name: City of Renton. Dej�armtent of Public Works Lessee Other x
Municipal Building
Mailing 200 Mill Aveeue South
Address Renton. Washington 98055 Phone: (206)235-2631
2. Name of City of Renton
Property Owner Parks Department
Municipal Building
Mailing 200 Mill Avenue South
Address Renton, Washington 98055 Phone: (206) 235-2631
3. Contact/ Charles E. Price, P.E.
Consultant: Storm Water Utility Engineer
200 MI11 Avenue South
Mailing Municipal Building
Address Renton, Washington 98055 Phone. (206) 235--2631
PROJECT INFORMATION:
4. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or
nearest street and intersection)
Project is located within the Maplewood Golf Course off of the Maple Valley
Highway, SR-169.
5. Legal Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet):
6. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands: rPdar Ritrar
7. Current use of property and existing improvements:
Golf Course
8. PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY and proposed improvements (be specific):
Golf Course
9. Proposed construction costs and schedule:
A. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed
project include additional developments contemplated but not
included in this application: $9,000
B. Construction dates (month/year) for which permit is requested:
Begin June 1, 1988 End October 1, 1988
10. List any other permits for this project from state, federal, local
governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have
applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency,
whether the permit has been applied for, and if so, the date of the
application, whether the application was approved or denied and the
date of same, and number of the application or permit:
Department of Fisheries Hydraulics Permit (applied for March 1, 1988)
I7S11S 11, 12, AND 13 TO BE COAPL97WD BY LOCAL OFFICIAL:
11. NATURE OF THE EXISTING SHORELINE. (Describe type of shoreline, such
as marine, stream, lake, lagoon, marsh, bog, swamp, flood plain,
floodway. delta: type of beach, such as accretion, erosion. high
bank, low bank, or dike; material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay,
rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any):
12. In the event that any of the proposed buildings or structures will
exceed a height of thirty-five (35) feet above the average grade
level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential
units, existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view.
13. If the application involves a conditional use or variance, set forth
in full that portion of the master program which provides that the
proposed use may be a conditional use, or, in the case of a variance,
from which the variance is being sought.
ITEXLS Id, I5, AND 26 TO BE PROVIDED BY APPLICANT:
14. If applying for a variance or a conditional use, complete the
variance or conditional use form.
15. Project Maps: Attach to application accurate site plan and vicinity
maps. Refer to application instruction handout for map requirements.
16. Additional information (If necessary, attach as separate sheet):
Project is for the restoration of Maplewood Creek which is experiencing erosion
and sedimentation problems. Work within the 200 foot shoreline area will involve
the relocation of the outfall into the Cedar River. This will be within the
Golf Course and will enhance fisheries.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
CITY OF RENTON
I. , being duly
sworn, certify that I am the above -named applicant for a permit to con-
struct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act
of 1971. and that the foregoing statements, answers, and information are
in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
SS
1
Signature
Subscribed and sworn to me this /
day of f"�/� /i elf .
Notary Public in and
Washington, residing
for te State of
at`�
k
'
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Date April 7, 1988
TO; Charles Price - Engineering Department
FROM: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
SUBJECT: ✓CAG-019-88-King County-Interlocal Agreement -Lower Cedar River Channel
Dredging Project (FCAPP)
CAG-020-88-King County- Interlocal Agreement -Maplewood Creek
Rextoration Project (FCAPP)
We return herewith fully executed document(s), as above -
captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official
public records. Copies should be forwarded to
and the other for your file.
Pursuant to your memo of 3/28/88 we return herewith
document(s), as above -captioned, which have been signed by
City Officials and need to be forwarded for further execution
by
King County
We return herewith recorded document(s), as above -captioned,
copy of which we have retained for our official public records.
Copies should be forwarded to appropriate parties and retained
as necessary for your files.
Please file a fully executed copy with the City Clerk's office
L ' J for our permanent records when received.
MEM-00 gn
CC.
Thank you.
J(NlwjDriginals of each contract)
APR 8 1988
CITY OF RENTON
Engineering Dept.
Eudousektut Ucsb4•
CIIA OE 9FL41UV1
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Date April 7, 1988
TO; Charles Price - Engineering Department
FROM: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
SUBJECT: CAG-019-88-King County-Interlocal Agreement -Lower Cedar River Channel
Dredging Project (FCAPP)
�iAG-020-88-King County- Interlocal Agreement -Maplewood Creek
Rextoration Project (FCAPP)
We return herewith fully executed document(s), as above -
captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official
public records. Copies should be forwarded to
and the other for your file.
Pursuant to your memo of 3/28/88 we return herewith
document(s), as above -captioned, which have been signed by
City Officials and need to be forwarded for further execution
by
King County
We return herewith recorded document(s), as above -captioned,
copy of which we have retained for our official public records.
Copies should be forwarded to appropriate parties and retained
as necessary for your files.
Please file a fully executed copy with the City Clerk's office
X for our permanent records when received.
Thank you.
MEM-00 gn
CC.
Enclosures (2 originals of each contract)
CAG-019-88
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between King County,
Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the "County" and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation
duly authorized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the
parties are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action,
and
WHEREAS, the King County Council has by Motion No. passed on
, 1988, authorized the King County Executive to enter into an
agreement with the City of Renton for the purpose of financing the Lower
Cedar River East Bank Repairs Project in accordance with the Flood Control
Assistance Account Program (FCAAP) RCW Ch. 86.26 and WAC 173-145.
WHEREAS, City of Renton has by appropriate legislative action
authorized this agreement, and
WHEREAS, it is the interest of the public served by both jurisdictions
that said project be constructed,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS COVENANTED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement shall be to assist in financing
the Lower Cedar River East Bank Repairs Project which is eligible for
grant funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology Flood Control
Assistance Account Program.
-1-
2. Terms and Conditions.
The County and the City agree to the terms and
conditions set forth in Exhibits No. I, II, and III, which are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF FE NT-QK1 , STATE OF WASHINGTON
�c -�' '& � L-T A X t
King County Executive Mayor
Signed this day Signed this /4d day
of ,1988 of 11988
APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-2-
EXHIBIT NO. I
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The County's responsibilities under this agreement shall be limited to passing
through to the City any available State funding for the project and fulfilling
any further administrative duties required by statute, as set forth below.
A. Project Administration and Execution
1. The City will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents,
obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to the County for tech-
nical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval,
award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management,
prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all
project documentation -as regarded by law and by the Washington State
Department of Ecology Grant Agreement No. G0088074, hereinafter, the
"Grant Agreement" and which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The grant agreement is administered by the Washington State Department
of Ecology, hereinafter referred to as the"Department".
2. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded
through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law.
No contract shall be awarded until approved in writing by the County.
The City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for
inspection and use by the County or the Department.
3. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing
appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency.
The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, construction management and any additional work required
to furnish a complete project. The County shall be responsible for
project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure
all work is done according to plans and specifications, and for final
project inspection in cooperation with the City and the Department.
4. This project will be designed and constructed in accordance with
applicable provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and Chapter 173-145 WAC.
The construction shall conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Department.
Payments toward construction will not be made until the plans and
specifications have been approved by the Department.
5. Within thirty (30) days after the award of the construction contract,
the City will submit to the Department a copy of the actual construc-
tion schedule, by month, for the entire construction period. If the
City fails to follow the construction schedule or does not receive
written approval from the contract officer to deviate from the sche-
dule, the Department and the County may terminate the grant for cause
as provided in Section D., herein.
6. The City will obtain any permits required for the project.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Two
7. The County, as signator with the Department on the grant agreement,
and the City as the lead agency for design construction, construction
management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the Grant
Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant
reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn pre-
sent to the Department for reimbursement to the City.
B. Payment of Grant Funds to City
1. When the City's actual costs exceed that major project element's
estimated total eligible cost described in Exhibit II by more than
ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County and
-the Department, reimbursement for excess costs will be disallowed.
The County will not provide remittance in excess of the County's share
of the total eligible project cost. The County's share shall not
exceed fifty (50) percent of the total eligible project cost of
$50,097 in cash, including Washington State Sales tax, where appli-
cable.
2. Requests for payment of eligible funds will be submitted by the City
on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher
shall be submitted to the County along with information which docu-
ments the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of
the project. The voucher request form and supportive documents must
itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in Exhibit
II. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form
and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit III.
In this guideline, the words "CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE" refer to the City
and "DEPARTMENT" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology
which administers the Flood Control Assistance Account Program.
Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to:
Surface Water Management Division
King County Department of Public Works
710 Second Avenue, Suite 730
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Brad Miyake
3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more
often than monthly on a reimbursable basis.
4. All payments are conditioned upon submission to the County of the
above -mentioned itemized state voucher request form, certified by the
City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services
performed within the effective dates of this agreement unless a writ-
ten modification is obtained.
5. The County shall remit to the City for fifty (50) percent of the total
eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit II except for the amount
withheld as security for City's performance as specified in Section
B.6.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Three
6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be with-
held by the Department as security for City's performance.
Monies withheld by the Department as security under the provisions of
this paragraph will be paid to the City upon completion of the project
described in Exhibit II and final approval by the Department, or upon
completion and approval of portions thereof.
7. When voucher requests are approved by the County and the Department,
payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee.
8. The City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty
(30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in
Exhibit II.
9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County
and/or the Department and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be
refunded to the County by the City.
C. Indemnification
1. The County shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,
consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project
described herein, except as provided in Section A of this agreement.
2. To the extent the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington
permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any
claim of liability arising out of the project described in this
agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained.
D. Termination for Cause
The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory
performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In
the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this
agreement, the County may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder
and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination.
A notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior to the effective date
of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or
other materials prepared by the City under this agreement, at the option
of the County, shall become its property, and the City shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
E. Effective Date and Time for Performance
All work performed on or after July 29, 1987, by the City consistent
with Exhibit II, Project Description, although performed prior to the
effective date of this agreement, is eligible for reimbursement under
Exhibit II, Budget Information, so long as requests for payment for such
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Four
work are submitted to, and approved by the Department pursuant to Article
B. of this agreement. All work performed by the Department, and the
actions of the City in performing such work prior to the effective date of
this agreement, shall be subject to the provisions of this agreement.
Approval for this funding was given by a letter from the Department to the
County dated July 29, 1987.
For all other purposes, the effective date of this agreement shall be the
date the Grant Agreement is signed by the Department.
This agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1989.
EXHIBIT NO. II
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project consists of repairs begun July 29, 1987 on the Cedar
River's east bank from the mouth at Lake Washington to the Logan
Avenue North bridge. The repairs are for erosion damage and will
protect Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton
Cedar River Park. Repairs include back filling areas of bank, placing
riprap where necessary, and planting willows to provide vegetation and
habitat enhancement.
Project Location: Cedar River, S. 7 to 18, T. 23, R. 5
Project Completion Date: June 30, 1989
Estimated Costs for Eligible Work Items
Work Item Unit Qty. Unit Cost Cost
Heavy and
Loose Riprap
Tons
629
$ 25.00
$15,725.00
Gabions
Installed
Cu.Yds.
174
135.00
23,490.00
Filter Blanket
Tons
465
12.00
5,580.00
Back Fill
Cu.Yds.
366
3.00
1,098.00
Willow Plants
Each
300
1.50
450.00
Total $46,343.00
EXHIBIT II
continued
BUDGET INFORMATION
MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS
Estimated Eligible Cost
1. Work Items $ 46,343.00
2. Design Pre -Engineering
3. Administrative Costs
4. Inspection Fee
5. Sales Tax 3,754.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST $ 50,097.00
EXHIBIT No. III
Flood Control Assistance Account Project Grant Agreement
GUIDELINE:
SUBMISSION OF A19-A VOUCHER
AND SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS
The purpose of this exhibit is to assist the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE in deter-
mining allowable items of cost. If the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE fails to name an
item of cost in the request for payment, this does not imply it is either
allowable or unallowable; rather, determination of allowability shall be
based upon the treatment of similar or related items of cost.
1. Factors Allowing Cost
In order to be allowable, costs must:
a. Be necessary and reasonable and not be a general expense,
b. Not be prohibited by any laws or regulations,
C. Conform to any cost limitations or exclusions,
d. Be consistent with state and federal (when applicable)
policies, regulations and procedures,
e. Be given consistent treatment through uniform accounting
principles,
f. Not be allocated to or included as a cost of any other
state/federal financed program, past, or present,
g. Be net of all allowable credits.
2. Certification
To assure expenditures are proper, vouchers requesting payment must be cer-
tified by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE. Form A19-A has a certification provision
which must be signed by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE or its authorized represen-
tative before payment will be allowed.
3. Credits
The applicable portion of any income, rebate, allowance, and other credit
relating to any allowable cost, received by or accruing to the
CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE, must be credited to the DEPARTMENT, either as a cost
reduction, or by cash refund, as appropriate.
4. Unforeseen/Emergency Expenditures
A contingency line item providing a specified amount for reimbursements for
unforeseen expenditures may be made only with the prior written approval of
the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM7)
Exhibit No. III
Page Two
5. Allowable Expenditures
No request for payment will be honored for those expenditures incurred before
the commencement date of the agreement, or after termination of such
agreement, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing.
6. Contract Provisions Controlling
Where any discrepancies between the specific provisions of the agreement and
the applicable cost principles arise, the agreement provisions shall apply.
The DEPARTMENT will not provide reimbursement in excess of the DEPARTMENT'S
share of the total eligible project cost.
7. - Phone Number
The CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE must include his business phone number along with the
documents requesting payment to expedite processing should questions arise.
8. Instructions - Form A19-A
Specific instructions for filling out the A19-A voucher and supportive docu-
ments are found in "Financial guidelines for Grants Management," Chapter 6,
published by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). A copy of
this text is available from the DEPARTMENT and is furnished with the
Pre -Application package.
9. Cost Obiect Breakdown
The documents supporting each request for payment must have a brief concise
breakdown of each cost object under the agreement, along with a brief expla-
nation for the charges.
10. Allowable Costs
Generally, whether costs are allowable depends upon cost principles appli-
cable to the particular project agreement. However, certain costs are com-
monly allowed. These include:
advertising
compensation for personal services
construction inspection
depreciation and use allowances
employee fringe benefits
employee morale, health and welfare
maintenance and repair
materials and supplies
taxes
transportation
travel related directly to this grant
project planning
project design
(CA -FORME)
Exhibit No. III
Page Three
Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees
during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual
leave, sick leave, court leave, military leave, and the like, if they are:
(1) provided pursuant to an approved leave system, and (2) the cost thereof
is equitable allocated to all related activities, including grant programs.
Employee benefits in the form of employers' contribution of expenses for
social security, employees' life and health insurance plans, unemployment
insurance coverage, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans,
severance pay, an the like, provided such benefits are granted under
approved plans and are distributed equitably to grant programs and to other
activities.
Where any questions involving allowability of costs arise, the DEPARTMENT
contracts officer should be consulted; otherwise, certain costs may be
disallowed.
11. Pavroll and Distribution of Time
Amounts charged for personal service, regardless of whether treated as
direct or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls documented and approved
in accordance with the generally accepted practice of the state or local
agency. Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance or equivalent
records for individual employees. Salaries and wages of employees
chargeable to more than one cost objective must be supported by appropriate
time distribution records. The method used should produce an equitable
distribution of time and effort. Such time records must be certified by the
project director. Such certified records are the only allowable source
document for charging and reporting personnel expenditures.
12. Costs Allowable With Prior Written Approval
Certain costs require prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Costs
requiring prior approval include indirect costs, some direct costs such as
equipment, insurance and indemnification, and preagreement costs. Again,
reference to cost principles and consultation with DEPARTMENT officials
should eliminate any questions and possible rejection of incurred costs.
13. Unallowable Costs
Certain costs are commonly disallowed. These unallowable costs include:
bad debts
contingencies
contributions and donations
entertainment
fines and penalties
interest and other financial costs
underrecovery of costs under grant agreements
See Section XI, D.3., "Financial Guidelines For Grants Management"
(CA-FORM9)
Exhibit No. III
Page Four
Once again, whether a cost is unallowable depends upon the applicable cost
principles to the agreement. Failure to clarify any question whether a cost
is unallowable or allowable may result in its disallowance by the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM10)
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Date April 7, 1988
TO; Charles Price - Engineering Department
FROM: Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
SUBJECT: CAG-019-88-King County-Interlocal Agreement -Lower Cedar River Channel
Dredging Project (FCAPP)
t,<AG-020-88-King County- Interlocal Agreement -Maplewood Creek
Rextoration Project (FCAPP)
We return herewith fully executed document(s), as above -
captioned, copy of which we have retained for our official
public records. Copies should be forwarded to
and the other for your file.
Pursuant to your memo of 3/28/88 we return herewith
Q documents), as above -captioned, which have been signed by
City Officials and need to be forwarded for further execution
by
King County
We return herewith recorded document(s), as above -captioned,
copy of which we have retained for our official public records.
Copies should be forwarded to appropriate parties and retained
as necessary for your files.
Please file a fully executed copy with the City Clerk's office
X for our permanent records when received.
Thank you.
MEM;00 gn
cc:
Enclosures (2 originals of each contract)
CAG-020-88
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between King County,
Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the "County" and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation
duly authorized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the
parties are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action,
and
WHEREAS, the King County Council has by Motion No. passed on
, 1988, authorized the King County Executive to enter into an
agreement with the City of Renton for the purpose of financing the Maplewood
Creek Restoration Project in accordance with the Flood Control Assistance
Account Program (FCAAP) RCW Ch. 86.26 and WAC 173-145.
WHEREAS, City of Renton has by appropriate legislative action
authorized this agreement, and
WHEREAS, it is the interest of the public served by both jurisdictions
that said project be constructed,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS COVENANTED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement shall be to assist in financing
the Maplewood Creek Restoration Project which is eligible for grant
funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology Flood Control
Assistance Account Program.
-1-
2. Terms and Conditions. The County and the City agree to the terms and
conditions set forth in Exhibits No. I, II, and III, which are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
King County Executive
Signed this day
of ,1988
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
CITY OF RENTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON
1
Mayor
Signed this 1,,v-t day
� V—J,,,w
APPROVED AS TO FORM
City Attorney
ATTEST:
-2-
EXHIBIT NO. I
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The County's responsibilities under this agreement shall be limited to passing
through to the City any available State funding for the project and fulfilling
any further administrative duties required by statute, as set forth below.
A. Protect Administration and Execution
1. The City will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents,
obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to the County for tech-
nical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval,
award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management,
prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all
project documentation -as regarded by law and by the Washington State
Department of Ecology Grant Agreement No. G0088115, hereinafter, the
"Grant Agreement" and which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The grant agreement is administered by the Washington State Department
of Ecology, hereinafter referred to as the"Department".
2. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded
through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law.
No contract shall be awarded until approved in writing by the County.
The City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for
inspection and use by the County or the Department.
3. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing
appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency.
The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, construction management and any additional work required
to furnish a complete project. The County shall be responsible for
project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure
all work is done according to plans and specifications, and for final
project inspection in cooperation with the City and the Department.
4. This project will be designed and constructed in accordance with
applicable provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and Chapter 173-145 WAC.
The construction shall conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Department.
Payments toward construction will not be made until the plans and
specifications have been approved by the Department.
5. Within thirty (30) days after the award of the construction contract,
the City will submit to the Department a copy of the actual construc-
tion schedule, by month, for the entire construction period. If the
City fails to follow the construction schedule or does not receive
written approval from the contract officer to deviate from the sche-
dule, the Department and the County may terminate the grant for cause
as provided in Section D., herein.
6. The City will obtain any permits required for the project.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Two
7. The County, as signator with the Department on the grant agreement,
and the City as the lead agency for design construction, construction
management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the Grant
Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant
reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn pre-
sent to the Department for reimbursement to the City.
B. Payment of Grant Funds to City
1. When the City's actual costs exceed that major project element's
estimated total eligible cost described in Exhibit II by more than
ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County and
the Department, reimbursement for excess costs will be disallowed.
The County will not provide remittance in excess of the County's share
of the total eligible project cost. The County's share shall not
exceed fifty (50) percent of the total eligible project cost of
$63,510 in cash, including Washington State Sales tax, where appli-
cable.
2. Requests for payment of eligible funds will be submitted by the City
on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher
shall be submitted to the County along with information which docu-
ments the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of
the project. The voucher request form and supportive documents must
itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in Exhibit
II. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form
and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit III.
In this guideline, the words "CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE" refer to the City
and "DEPARTMENT" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology
which administers the Flood Control Assistance Account Program.
Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to:
Surface Water Management Division
King County Department of Public Works
710 Second Avenue, Suite 730
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Brad Miyake
3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more
often than monthly on a reimbursable basis.
4. All payments are conditioned upon submission to the County of the
above -mentioned itemized state voucher request form, certified by the
City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services
performed within the effective dates of this agreement unless a writ-
ten modification is obtained.
5. The County shall remit to the City for fifty (50) percent of the total
eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit II except for the amount
withheld as security for City's performance as specified in Section
B.6.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Three
6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be with-
held by the Department as security for City's performance.
Monies withheld by the Department as security under the provisions of
this paragraph will be paid to the City upon completion of the project
described in Exhibit II and final approval by the Department, or upon
completion and approval of portions thereof.
7. When voucher requests are approved by the County and the Department,
payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee.
8. The City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty
(30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in
Exhibit II.
9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County
and/or the Department and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be
refunded to the County by the City.
C. Indemnification
1. The County shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,
consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project
described herein, except as provided in Section A of this agreement.
2. To the extent the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington
permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any
claim of liability arising out of the project described in this
agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained.
D. Termination for Cause
The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory
performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In
the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this
agreement, the County may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder
and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination.
A notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior to the effective date
of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or
other materials prepared by the City under this agreement, at the option
of the County, shall become its property, and the City shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
E. Effective Date and Time for Performance
The effective date of this agreement shall be the date the Grant Agreement
is signed by the Department. Any work performed prior to the effective
date of this agreement will be at the sole expense and risk of the City.
This agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1989.
EXHIBIT NO. II
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION: CITY OF RENTON STORM WATER UTILITY
GRANTEE: KING COUNTY
PROJECT TITLE: MAPLEWOOD CREEK RESTORATION
PROJECT LOCATION: MAPLEWOOD CREEK, S15,21,22;T23;R15
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project consists of engineering and construction for the removal of gra-
vel and sediments from the channel and settling basin, and stabilization of
currently eroding banks along Maplewood Creek.
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 30, 1989
Estimated Costs for Eligible Work Items
Work Item Unit Qty. Unit Cost Cost
Excavating and Haul CY 550 $ 5.00 $ 2,750
Riprap Tons 1,750 25.00 43,750
Planting and
Revegetation LS 500
Clearing and Debris
Removal LS 1,500
Clean Up LS 1,000
TOTAL $ 49,500
EXHIBIT II
continued
BUDGET INFORMATION
MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS
Estimated Eliqible Cost
1. Work Items
2. Design Pre -Engineering
3. Administrative Costs
4. Inspection Fee
5. Miscellaneous
6. Sales Tax
TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST
$ 49,500
8,000
1,000
1,000
4,010
$ 63,510
EXHIBIT No. III
Flood Control Assistance Account Project Grant Agreement
GUIDELINE:
SUBMISSION OF A19-A VOUCHER
AND SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS
The purpose of this exhibit is to assist the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE in deter-
mining allowable items of cost. If the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE fails to name an
item of cost in the request for payment, this does not imply it is either
allowable or unallowable; rather, determination of allowability shall be
based upon the treatment of similar or related items of cost.
1. Factors Allowinq Cost
In order to be allowable, costs must:
a. Be necessary and reasonable and not be a general expense,
b. Not be prohibited by any laws or regulations,
C. Conform to any cost limitations or exclusions,
d. Be consistent with state and federal (when applicable)
policies, regulations and procedures,
e. Be given consistent treatment through uniform accounting
principles,
f. Not be allocated to or included as a cost of any other
state/federal financed program, past, or present,
g. Be net of all allowable credits.
2. Certification
To assure expenditures are proper, vouchers requesting payment must be cer-
tified by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE. Form A19-A has a certification provision
which must be signed by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE or its authorized represen-
tative before payment will be allowed.
3. Credits
The applicable portion of any income, rebate, allowance, and other credit
relating to any allowable cost, received by or accruing to the
CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE, must be credited to the DEPARTMENT, either as a cost
reduction, or by cash refund, as appropriate.
4. Unforeseen/Emergency Expenditures
A contingency line item providing a specified amount for reimbursements for
unforeseen expenditures may be made only with the prior written approval of
the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM7)
Exhibit No. III
Page Two
5. Allowable Expenditures
No request for payment will be honored for those expenditures incurred before
the commencement date of the agreement, or after termination of such
agreement, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing.
6. Contract Provisions Controlling
Where any discrepancies between the specific provisions of the agreement and
the applicable cost principles arise, the agreement provisions shall apply.
The DEPARTMENT will not provide reimbursement in excess of the DEPARTMENT'S
share of the total eligible project cost.
7. Phone Number
The CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE must include his business phone number along with the
documents requesting payment to expedite processing should questions arise.
8. Instructions - Form A19-A
Specific instructions for filling out the A19-A voucher and supportive docu-
ments are found in "Financial guidelines for Grants Management," Chapter 6,
published by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). A copy of
this text is available from the DEPARTMENT and is furnished with the
Pre -Application package.
9. Cost Object Breakdown
The documents supporting each request for payment must have a brief concise
breakdown of each cost object under the agreement, along with a brief expla-
nation for the charges.
10. Allowable Costs
Generally, whether costs are allowable depends upon cost principles appli-
cable to the particular project agreement. However, certain costs are com-
monly allowed. These include:
advertising
compensation for personal services
construction inspection
depreciation and use allowances
employee fringe benefits
employee morale, health and welfare
maintenance and repair
materials and supplies
taxes
transportation
travel related directly to this grant
project planning
project design
(CA-FORM8)
Exhibit No. III
Page Three
Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees
during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual
leave, sick leave, court leave, military leave, and the like, if they are:
(1) provided pursuant to an approved leave system, and (2) the cost thereof
is equitable allocated to all related activities, including grant programs.
Employee benefits in the form of employers' contribution of expenses for
social security, employees' life and health insurance plans, unemployment
insurance coverage, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans,
severance pay, an the like, provided such benefits are granted under
approved plans and are distributed equitably to grant programs and to other
activities.
Where any questions involving allowability of costs arise, the DEPARTMENT
contracts officer should be consulted; otherwise, certain costs may be
disallowed.
11. Pavroll and Distribution of Time
Amounts charged for personal service, regardless of whether treated as
direct or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls documented and approved
in accordance with the generally accepted practice of the state or local
agency. Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance or equivalent
records for individual employees. Salaries and wages of employees
chargeable to more than one cost objective must be supported by appropriate
time distribution records. The method used should produce an equitable
distribution of time and effort. Such time records must be certified by the
project director. Such certified records are the only allowable source
document for charging and reporting personnel expenditures.
12. Costs Allowable With Prior Written Approval
Certain costs require prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Costs
requiring prior approval include indirect costs, some direct costs such as
equipment, insurance and indemnification, and preagreement costs. Again,
reference to cost principles and consultation with DEPARTMENT officials
should eliminate any questions and possible rejection of incurred costs.
13. Unallowable Costs
Certain costs are commonly disallowed. These unallowable costs include:
bad debts
contingencies
contributions and donations
entertainment
fines and penalties
interest and other financial costs
underrecovery of costs under grant agreements
See Section XI, D.3., "Financial Guidelines For Grants Management"
(CA-FORM9)
Exhibit No. III
Page Four
Once again, whether a cost is unallowable depends upon the applicable cost
principles to the agreement. Failure to clarify any question whether a cost
is unallowable or allowable may result in its disallowance by the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM10)
a t
CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor Y Y Design/Utility Engineering
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 28, 1988
TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk
FROM: Charles Price, Storm Water Utility Engineer
SUBJECT: Flood Control Assistance Account Program (FCAAP)
Inter Local Agreements:
Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging Project
Maplewood Creek Restoration Project
Dear Maxine:
Attached you will find two (2) sets each of the FCAAP Inter Local Agreements for both the Lower
Cedar River Channel Dredging Project and the Maplewood Creek Restoration.
You will also find a copy of Resolution No. 2711 authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
documents relating to request for Washington State Department of Ecology FCAAP funding.
Please sign each set of these documents and forward them to the Mayor for execution. Thank you.
i
i
Chuck Price
cm/fcanpres/jlm
Attachments
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631
CITY OF RENTON
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean - Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes - Theodore R. Parry
Assistant City Attorneys
March 15, 1988
TO: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Flood Control Assistance Account Program
Interlocal Agreements
Dear Dick:
I have reviewed the agreements as above captioned and they are
approved as to legal form. / 1
Warren
LJW:as.
cc: Mayor
N8.20:18.
Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678
0
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2711
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE
DOCUMENTS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT
PROGRAM.
WHEREAS the City of Renton, Washington, has heretofore made
application for certain State Aid Grant Projects; and
WHEREAS the implementation of said projects requires the
execution of certain documents relating thereto including the
allocation and expenditure of State Flood Control Assistance
Account Program (FCAAP) Funds, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above recitals are hereby found to be true
and correct.
SECTION II: The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Renton,
Washington are hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver unto appropriate governmental agencies any and all
documents relating to the allocation and expenditure of FCAAP
Funding including the following project descriptions, to -wit:
1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs; and
Maplewood Creek Restoration
which said projects includes certain Flood Control and storm
drainage construction improvements.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 2711
SECTION III: The City Clerk is hereby authorized to certify
this Resolution in sufficient copies and furnish same to the
appropriate governmental agencies.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of March, 1988.
Marilyn 41. P ersen Deputy C ty Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR
this 21st
day
of March, 1988.
�(-%
Ea
&-�� ��
k "L
� K--
Clyme ,
M
or
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Lawre a J. Warr City Attorney
RES:10/3/15/88
-2-
i
King County
Department of Public Works
Donald J. LaBelle, Director
900 King Countv Administration Bldg.
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206)344-2517
February 26, 1988
Dick Houghton
Director of Public Works
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
RECEIVED
IfZ
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
CITY OF RENTON
RE: Flood Control Assistance Account Program/Lower Cedar River Channel Dredging
Dear Mr. Houghton:
Enclosed please find an interlocal agreement for the Lower Cedar River Channel
Dredging Project. Please note that a similar agreement was approved by the City
of Renton during the last biennium. Please contact Jim Kramer, Manager, Surface
Water Management Division, at 344-2585 if there are questions about the terms
of the enclosed agreement.
We look forward to working with your department and the Department of Ecology
on this and the other two Flood Control Assistance Account Program projects
awarded to the City of Renton.
Sincerely,
Paul Tanaka
Deputy Director
PT:WJ:ds(C-L075)
Enclosure
cc: Jim Kramer, Manager, Surface Water Management Division
ATTN: Brad Miyake, Manager, Finance and Billing Section
Wendy Jackson, Claims Analyst
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between King County,
Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the "County" and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation
duly authorized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the
parties are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action,
and
WHEREAS, the King County Council has by Motion No. passed on
, 1988, authorized the King County Executive to enter into an
agreement with the City of Renton for the purpose of financing the Lower
Cedar River East Bank Repairs Project in accordance with the Flood Control
Assistance Account Program (FCAAP) RCW Ch. 86.26 and WAC 173-145.
WHEREAS, City of Renton has by appropriate legislative action
authorized this agreement, and
WHEREAS, it is the interest of the public served by both jurisdictions
that said project be constructed,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS COVENANTED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement shall be to assist in financing
the Lower Cedar River East Bank Repairs Project which is eligible for
grant funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology Flood Control
Assistance Account Program.
-1-
2. Terms and Conditions. The County and the City agree to the terms and
conditions set forth in Exhibits No. I, II, and III, which are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CITY OF STATE OF WASHINGTON
King County Executive
Signed this day
of ,1988
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Mayor
Signed this day
of ,1988
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-2-
EXHIBIT NO. I
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The County's responsibilities under this agreement shall be limited to passing
through to the City any available State funding for the project and fulfilling
any further administrative duties required by statute, as set forth below.
A. Project Administration and Execution
1. The City will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents,
obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to the County for tech-
nical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval,
award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management,
prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all
project documentation as regarded by law and by the Washington State
Department of Ecology Grant Agreement No. G0088074, hereinafter, the
"Grant Agreement" and which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The grant agreement is administered by the Washington State Department
of Ecology, hereinafter referred to as the"Department".
2. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded
through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law.
No contract shall be awarded until approved in writing by the County.
The City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for
inspection and use by the County or the Department.
3. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing
appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency.
The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, construction management and any additional work required
to furnish a complete project. The County shall be responsible for
project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure
all work is done according to plans and specifications, and for final
project inspection in cooperation with the City and the Department.
4. This project will be designed and constructed in accordance with
applicable provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and Chapter 173-145 WAC.
The construction shall conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Department.
Payments toward construction will not be made until the plans and
specifications have been approved by the Department.
5. Within thirty (30) days after the award of the construction contract,
the City will submit to the Department a copy of the actual construc-
tion schedule, by month, for the entire construction period. If the
City fails to follow the construction schedule or does not receive
written approval from the contract officer to deviate from the sche-
dule, the Department and the County may terminate the grant for cause
as provided in Section D., herein.
6. The City will obtain any permits required for the project.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Two
7. The County, as signator with the Department on the grant agreement,
and the City as the lead agency for design construction, construction
management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the Grant
Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant
reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn pre-
sent to the Department for reimbursement to the City.
B. Payment of Grant Funds to City
1. When the City's actual costs exceed that major project element's
estimated total eligible cost described in Exhibit II by more than
ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County and
the Department, reimbursement for excess costs will be disallowed.
The County will not provide remittance in excess of the County's share
of the total eligible project cost. The County's share shall not
exceed fifty (50) percent of the total eligible project cost of
$50,097 in cash, including Washington State Sales tax, where appli-
cable.
2. Requests for payment of eligible funds will be submitted by the City
on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher
shall be submitted to the County along with information which docu-
ments the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of
the project. The voucher request form and supportive documents must
itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in Exhibit
II. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form
and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit III.
In this guideline, the words "CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE" refer to the City
and "DEPARTMENT" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology
which administers the Flood Control Assistance Account Program.
Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to:
Surface Water Management Division
King County Department of Public Works
710 Second Avenue, Suite 730
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Brad Miyake
3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more
often than monthly on a reimbursable basis.
4. All payments are conditioned upon submission to the County of the
above -mentioned itemized state voucher request form, certified by the
City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services
performed within the effective dates of this agreement unless a writ-
ten modification is obtained.
5. The County shall remit to the City for fifty (50) percent of the total
eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit II except for the amount
withheld as security for City's performance as specified in Section
B.6.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Three
6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be with-
held by the Department as security for City's performance.
Monies withheld by the Department as security under the provisions of
this paragraph will be paid to the City upon completion of the project
described in Exhibit II and final approval by the Department, or upon
completion and approval of portions thereof.
7. When voucher requests are approved by the County and the Department,
payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee.
8. The City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty
(30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in
Exhibit II.
9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County
and/or the Department and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be
refunded to the County by the City.
C. Indemnification
1. The County shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,
consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project
described herein, except as provided in Section A of this agreement.
2. To the extent the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington
permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any
claim of liability arising out of the project described in this
agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained.
D. Termination for Cause
The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory
performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In
the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this
agreement, the County may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder
and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination.
A notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior to the effective date
of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or
other materials prepared by the City under this agreement, at the option
of the County, shall become its property, and the City shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
E. Effective Date and Time for Performance
All work performed on or after July 29, 1987, by the City consistent
with Exhibit II, Project Description, although performed prior to the
effective date of this agreement, is eligible for reimbursement under
Exhibit II, Budget Information, so long as requests for payment for such
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Four
work are submitted to, and approved by the Department pursuant to Article
B. of this agreement. All work performed by the Department, and the
actions of the City in performing such work prior to the effective date of
this agreement, shall be subject to the provisions of this agreement.
Approval for this funding was given by a letter from the Department to the
County dated July 29, 1987.
For all other purposes, the effective date of this agreement shall be the
date the Grant Agreement is signed by the Department.
This agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1989.
EXHIBIT NO. II
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This project consists of repairs begun July 29, 1987 on the Cedar
River's east bank from the mouth at Lake Washington to the Logan
Avenue North bridge. The repairs are for erosion damage and will
protect Boeing Airplane Company - Renton Plant, and the City of Renton
Cedar River Park. Repairs include back filling areas of bank, placing
riprap where necessary, and planting willows to provide vegetation and
habitat enhancement.
Project Location: Cedar River, S. 7 to 18, T. 23, R. 5
Project Completion Date: June 30, 1989
Estimated Costs for Eligible Work Items
Work Item Unit Qty. Unit Cost Cost
Heavy and
Loose Riprap
Tons
629
$ 25.00
$15,725.00
Gabions
Installed
Cu.Yds.
174
135.00
23,490.00
Filter Blanket
Tons
465
12.00
5,580.00
Back Fill
Cu.Yds.
366
3.00
1,098.00
Willow Plants
Each
300
1.50
450.00
Total $46,343.00
EXHIBIT II
continued
BUDGET INFORMATION
MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS
Estimated Eligible Cost
1. Work Items $ 46,343.00
2. Design Pre -Engineering
3. Administrative Costs
4. Inspection Fee
5. Sales Tax 3,754.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST $ 50,097.00
EXHIBIT No. III
Flood Control Assistance Account Project Grant Agreement
GUIDELINE:
SUBMISSION OF A19-A VOUCHER
AND SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS
The purpose of this exhibit is to assist the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE in deter-
mining allowable items of cost. If the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE fails to name an
item of cost in the request for payment, this does not imply it is either
allowable or unallowable; rather, determination of allowability shall be
based upon the treatment of similar or related items of cost.
1. Factors Allowing Cost
In order to be allowable, costs must:
a. Be necessary and reasonable and not be a general expense,
b. Not be prohibited by any laws or regulations,
C. Conform to any cost limitations or exclusions,
d. Be consistent with state and federal (when applicable)
policies, regulations and procedures,
e. Be given consistent treatment through uniform accounting
principles,
f. Not be allocated to or included as a cost of any other
state/federal financed program, past, or present,
g. Be net of all allowable credits.
2. Certification
To assure expenditures are proper, vouchers requesting payment must be cer-
tified by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE. Form A19-A has a certification provision
which must be signed by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE or its authorized represen-
tative before payment will be allowed.
3. Credits
The applicable portion of any income, rebate, allowance, and other credit
relating to any allowable cost, received by or accruing to the
CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE, must be credited to the DEPARTMENT, either as a cost
reduction, or by cash refund, as appropriate.
4. Unforeseen/Emergency Expenditures
A contingency line item providing a specified amount for reimbursements for
unforeseen expenditures may be made only with the prior written approval of
the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM7)
Exhibit No. III
Page Two
5. Allowable Expenditures
No request for payment will be honored for those expenditures incurred before
the commencement date of the agreement, or after termination of such
agreement, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing.
6. Contract Provisions Controlling
Where any discrepancies between the specific provisions of the agreement and
the applicable cost principles arise, the agreement provisions shall apply.
The DEPARTMENT will not provide reimbursement in excess of the DEPARTMENT'S
share of the total eligible project cost.
7. Phone Number
The CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE must include his business phone number along with the
documents requesting payment to expedite processing should questions arise.
8. Instructions - Form A19-A
Specific instructions for filling out the A19-A voucher and supportive docu-
ments are found in "Financial guidelines for Grants Mana ement," Chapter 6,
published by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). A copy of
this text is available from the DEPARTMENT and is furnished with the
Pre -Application package.
9. Cost Object Breakdown
The documents supporting each request for payment must have a brief concise
breakdown of each cost object under the agreement, along with a brief expla-
nation for the charges.
10. Allowable Costs
Generally, whether costs are allowable depends upon cost principles appli-
cable to the particular project agreement. However, certain costs are com-
monly allowed. These include:
advertising
compensation for personal services
construction inspection
depreciation and use allowances
employee fringe benefits
employee morale, health and welfare
maintenance and repair
materials and supplies
taxes
transportation
travel related directly to this grant
project planning
project design
(CA -FORMS)
Exhibit No. III
Page Three
Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees
during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual
leave, sick leave, court leave, military leave, and the like, if they are:
(1) provided pursuant to an approved leave system, and (2) the cost thereof
is equitable allocated to all related activities, including grant programs.
Employee benefits in the form of employers' contribution of expenses for
social security, employees' life and health insurance plans, unemployment
insurance coverage, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans,
severance pay, an the like, provided such benefits are granted under
approved plans and are distributed equitably to grant programs and to other
activities.
Where any questions involving allowability of costs arise, the DEPARTMENT
contracts officer should be consulted; otherwise, certain costs may be
disallowed.
11. Payroll and Distribution of Time
Amounts charged for personal service, regardless of whether treated as
direct or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls documented and approved
in accordance with the generally accepted practice of the state or local
agency. Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance or equivalent
records for individual employees. Salaries and wages of employees
chargeable to more than one cost objective must be supported by appropriate
time distribution records. The method used should produce an equitable
distribution of time and effort. Such time records must be certified by the
project director. Such certified records are the only allowable source
document for charging and reporting personnel expenditures.
12. Costs Allowable With Prior Written Approval
Certain costs require prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Costs
requiring prior approval include indirect costs, some direct costs such as
equipment, insurance and indemnification, and preagreement costs. Again,
reference to cost principles and consultation with DEPARTMENT officials
should eliminate any questions and possible rejection of incurred costs.
13. Unallowable Costs
Certain costs are commonly disallowed. These unallowable costs include:
bad debts
contingencies
contributions and donations
entertainment
fines and penalties
interest and other financial costs
underrecovery of costs under grant agreements
See Section XI, D.3., "Financial Guidelines For Grants Manaqement"
(CA-FORM9)
Exhibit No. III
Page Four
Once again, whether a cost is unallowable depends upon the applicable cost
principles to the agreement. Failure to clarify any question whether a cost
is unallowable or allowable may result in its disallowance by the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM10)
RECEIVED
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
CITY OF RENTON
King County
Department of Public Works
Donald J. LaBelle, Director
900 King Count}, Administration Bldg.
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(206)344-2517
March 7, 1988
Richard Houghton
Director of Public Works
200 Mill Avenue South
Renton, WA 98055
RE: Flood Control Assistance Account Program/Maplewood Creek Restoration
Dear Mr. Houghton:
Enclosed please find an interlocal agreement for the Maplewood Creek
Restoration Project. Please note that a similar agreement was approved by
the City of Renton during the last biennium. Please contact Jim Kramer,
Manager, Surface Water Management Division, at 344-2585 if there are
questions about the terms of the enclosed agreement.
We look forward to working with
on this and the other two Flood
awarded to the City of Renton.
Sincerely,
Paul Tanaka
Deputy Director
PT:WJ:ds(C-L075)
Enclosure
your department and the Department of Ecology
Control Assistance Account Program projects
cc: Jim Kramer, Manager, Surface Water Management Division
ATTN: Brad Miyake, Manager, Finance and Billing Section
Wendy Jackson, Claims Analyst
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between King County,
Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the "County" and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation
duly authorized and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as the "City".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the
parties are each authorized to enter into an agreement for cooperative action,
and
WHEREAS, the King County Council has by Motion No. passed on
, 1988, authorized the King County Executive to enter into an
agreement with the City of Renton for the purpose of financing the Maplewood
Creek Restoration Project in accordance with the Flood Control Assistance
Account Program (FCAAP) RCW Ch. 86.26 and WAC 173-145.
WHEREAS, City of Renton has by appropriate legislative action
authorized this agreement, and
WHEREAS, it is the interest of the public served by both jurisdictions
that said project be constructed,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS COVENANTED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement shall be to assist in financing
the Maplewood Creek Restoration Project which is eligible for grant
funds from the Washington State Department of Ecology Flood Control
Assistance Account Program.
-1-
2. Terms and Conditions. The County and the City agree to the terms and
conditions set forth in Exhibits No. I, II, and III, which are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
King County Executive
Signed this day
of ,1988
APPROVED AS TO FORM
CITY OF RENTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON
Mayor
Signed this day
of
.1988
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney City Attorney
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-2-
EXHIBIT NO. I
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The County's responsibilities under this agreement shall be limited to passing
through to the City any available State funding for the project and fulfilling
any further administrative duties required by statute, as set forth below.
A. Project Administration and Execution
1. The City will prepare all plans, specifications and bid documents,
obtain all permits, submit the bid documents to the County for tech-
nical review, advertise for bids, receive bids, and upon approval,
award the contract, provide all inspection, construction management,
prepare and pay progress payments to the contractor and complete all
project documentation as regarded by law and by the Washington State
Department of Ecology Grant Agreement No. G0088115, hereinafter, the
"Grant Agreement" and which is incorporated herein by this reference.
The grant agreement is administered by the Washington State Department
of Ecology, hereinafter referred to as the"Department".
2. Contracts for construction and purchase of equipment shall be awarded
through a process of competitive bidding, if required by State law.
No contract shall be awarded until approved in writing by the County.
The City shall retain copies of all bids and contracts awarded for
inspection and use by the County or the Department.
3. For purposes of administration of this project, including providing
appropriate environmental reviews, the City shall act as lead agency.
The City shall be responsible for design, right-of-way acquisition,
construction, construction management and any additional work required
to furnish a complete project. The County shall be responsible for
project plan approval, supervising and inspection of project to assure
all work is done according to plans and specifications, and for final
project inspection in cooperation with the City and the Department.
4. This project will be designed and constructed in accordance with
applicable provisions of Chapter 86.26 RCW and Chapter 173-145 WAC.
The construction shall conform to the plans and specifications
approved by the Department.
Payments toward construction will not be made until the plans and
specifications have been approved by the Department.
5. Within thirty (30) days after the award of the construction contract,
the City will submit to the Department a copy of the actual construc-
tion schedule, by month, for the entire construction period. If the
City fails to follow the construction schedule or does not receive
written approval from the contract officer to deviate from the sche-
dule, the Department and the County may terminate the grant for cause
as provided in Section D., herein.
6. The City will obtain any permits required for the project.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Two
7. The County, as signator with the Department on the grant agreement,
and the City as the lead agency for design construction, construction
management and inspection shall abide by the terms of the Grant
Agreement. The City will prepare the required documentation for grant
reimbursement and will deliver to the County, which will in turn pre-
sent to the Department for reimbursement to the City.
B. Payment of Grant Funds to Cit
1. When the City's actual costs exceed that major project element's
estimated total eligible cost described in Exhibit II by more than
ten (10) percent without prior written approval by the County and
the Department, reimbursement for excess costs will be disallowed.
The County will not provide remittance in excess of the County's share
of the total eligible project cost. The County's share shall not
exceed fifty (50) percent of the total eligible project cost of
$63,510 in cash, including Washington State Sales tax, where appli-
cable.
2. Requests for payment of eligible funds will be submitted by the City
on state voucher request forms provided by the County. Each voucher
shall be submitted to the County along with information which docu-
ments the work performed, activities undertaken, and the progress of
the project. The voucher request form and supportive documents must
itemize all allowable costs by major elements as described in Exhibit
II. A general guideline for completion of the voucher request form
and supportive documents is included in this agreement as Exhibit III.
In this guideline, the words "CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE" refer to the City
and "DEPARTMENT" refers to the Washington State Department of Ecology
which administers the Flood Control Assistance Account Program.
Vouchers and supportive documents shall be submitted to:
Surface Water Management Division
King County Department of Public Works
710 Second Avenue, Suite 730
Seattle, WA 98104
Attn: Brad Miyake
3. Payment requests will be submitted at least quarterly and not more
often than monthly on a reimbursable basis.
4. All payments are conditioned upon submission to the County of the
above -mentioned itemized state voucher request form, certified by the
City. All payments will be for delivery of materials and/or services
performed within the effective dates of this agreement unless a writ-
ten modification is obtained.
5. The County shall remit to the City for fifty (50) percent of the total
eligible project cost set forth in Exhibit II except for the amount
withheld as security for City's performance as specified in Section
B.6.
EXHIBIT No. I
Page Three
6. Ten (10) percent of each reimbursement payment shall be with-
held by the Department as security for City's performance.
Monies withheld by the Department as security under the provisions of
this paragraph will be paid to the City upon completion of the project
described in Exhibit II and final approval by the Department, or upon
completion and approval of portions thereof.
7. When voucher requests are approved by the County and the Department,
payments will be made to the mutually agreed upon designee.
8. The City shall submit final request(s) for compensation within thirty
(30) days after satisfactory completion of the project specified in
Exhibit II.
9. All payments to the City shall be subject to final audit by the County
and/or the Department and any unauthorized expenditure(s) shall be
refunded to the County by the City.
C. Indemnification
1. The County shall in no way be held responsible for payment of salaries,
consultant's fees, and other overhead costs related to the project
described herein, except as provided in Section A of this agreement.
2. To the extent the Constitution and Laws of the State of Washington
permit, the City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County from any
claim of liability arising out of the project described in this
agreement, or from operation of the facilities or equipment obtained.
D. Termination for Cause
The obligation of the County to the City is contingent upon satisfactory
performance by the City of all of its obligations under this agreement. In
the event the City fails to perform any obligation required of it by this
agreement, the County may refuse to pay any further funds thereunder
and/or terminate this agreement by giving written notice of termination.
A notice shall be given at least five (5) days prior to the effective date
of termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or
other materials prepared by the City under this agreement, at the option
of the County, shall become its property, and the City shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials.
E. Effective Date and Time for Performance
The effective date of this agreement shall be the date the Grant Agreement
is signed by the Department. Any work performed prior to the effective
date of this agreement will be at the sole expense and risk of the City.
This agreement shall terminate on June 30, 1989.
EXHIBIT NO. II
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION: CITY OF RENTON STORM WATER UTILITY
GRANTEE: KING COUNTY
PROJECT TITLE: MAPLEWOOD CREEK RESTORATION
PROJECT LOCATION: MAPLEWOOD CREEK, S15,21,22;T23;R15
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project consists of engineering and construction for the removal of gra-
vel and sediments from the channel and settling basin, and stabilization of
currently eroding banks along Maplewood Creek.
PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: June 30, 1989
Estimated Costs for Eligible Work Items
Work Item Unit Qty. Unit Cost Cost
Excavating and Haul CY 550 $ 5.00 $ 2,750
Riprap Tons 1,750 25.00 43,750
Planting and
Revegetation LS 500
Clearing and Debris
Removal LS 1,500
Clean Up LS 1,000
TOTAL $ 49,500
EXHIBIT II
continued
BUDGET INFORMATION
MAJOR PROJECT ELEMENTS
Estimated Eliqible Cost
1. Work Items $ 49,500
2. Design Pre -Engineering 8,000
3. Administrative Costs 1,000
4. Inspection Fee 1,000
5. Miscellaneous
6. Sales Tax 4,010
TOTAL ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE PROJECT COST $ 63,510
EXHIBIT No. III
Flood Control Assistance Account Project Grant Agreement
GUIDELINE:
SUBMISSION OF A19-A VOUCHER
AND SUPPORTIVE DOCUMENTS
The purpose of this exhibit is to assist the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE in deter-
mining allowable items of cost. If the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE fails to name an
item of cost in the request for payment, this does not imply it is either
allowable or unallowable; rather, determination of allowability shall be
based upon the treatment of similar or related items of cost.
1. Factors Allowing Cost
In order to be allowable, costs must:
a. Be necessary and reasonable and not be a general expense,
b. Not be prohibited by any laws or regulations,
C. Conform to any cost limitations or exclusions,
d. Be consistent with state and federal (when applicable)
policies, regulations and procedures,
e. Be given consistent treatment through uniform accounting
principles,
f. Not be allocated to or included as a cost of any other
state/federal financed program, past, or present,
g. Be net of all allowable credits.
2. Certification
To assure expenditures are proper, vouchers requesting payment must be cer-
tified by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE. Form A19-A has a certification provision
which must be signed by the CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE or its authorized represen-
tative before payment will be allowed.
3. Credits
The applicable portion of any income, rebate, allowance, and other credit
relating to any allowable cost, received by or accruing to the
CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE, must be credited to the DEPARTMENT, either as a cost
reduction, or by cash refund, as appropriate.
4. Unforeseen/Emergency Expenditures
A contingency line item providing a specified amount for reimbursements for
unforeseen expenditures may be made only with the prior written approval of
the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM7)
Exhibit No. III
Page Two
5. Allowable Expenditures
No request for payment will be honored for those expenditures incurred before
the commencement date of the agreement, or after termination of such
agreement, unless otherwise agreed upon in writing.
6. Contract Provisions Controlling
Where any discrepancies between the specific provisions of the agreement and
the applicable cost principles arise, the agreement provisions shall apply.
The DEPARTMENT will not provide reimbursement in excess of the DEPARTMENT'S
share of the total eligible project cost.
7. Phone Number
The CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE must include his business phone number along with the
documents requesting payment to expedite processing should questions arise.
8. Instructions - Form A19-A
Specific instructions for filling out the A19-A voucher and supportive docu-
ments are found in "Financial guidelines for Grants Mana ement," Chapter 6,
published by the Washington State Department of Ecology WOE . A copy of
this text is available from the DEPARTMENT and is furnished with the
Pre -Application package.
9. Cost Object Breakdown
The documents supporting each request for payment must have a brief concise
breakdown of each cost object under the agreement, along with a brief expla-
nation for the charges.
10. Allowable Costs
Generally, whether costs are allowable depends upon cost principles appli-
cable to the particular project agreement. However, certain costs are com-
monly allowed. These include:
advertising
compensation for personal services
construction inspection
depreciation and use allowances
employee fringe benefits
employee morale, health and welfare
maintenance and repair
materials and supplies
taxes
transportation
travel related directly to this grant
project planning
project design
(CA -FORMS)
Exhibit No. III
Page Three
Employee benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to employees
during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as for annual
leave, sick leave, court leave, military leave, and the like, if they are:
(1) provided pursuant to an approved leave system, and (2) the cost thereof
is equitable allocated to all related activities, including grant programs.
Employee benefits in the form of employers' contribution of expenses for
social security, employees' life and health insurance plans, unemployment
insurance coverage, workmen's compensation insurance, pension plans,
severance pay, an the like, provided such benefits are granted under
approved plans and are distributed equitably to grant programs and to other
activities.
Where any questions involving allowability of costs arise, the DEPARTMENT
contracts officer should be consulted; otherwise, certain costs may be
disallowed.
11. Payroll and Distribution of Time
Amounts charged for personal service, regardless of whether treated as
direct or indirect costs, will be based on payrolls documented and approved
in accordance with the generally accepted practice of the state or local
agency. Payrolls must be supported by time and attendance or equivalent
records for individual employees. Salaries and wages of employees
chargeable to more than one cost objective must be supported by appropriate
time distribution records. The method used should produce an equitable
distribution of time and effort. Such time records must be certified by the
project director. Such certified records are the only allowable source
document for charging and reporting personnel expenditures.
12. Costs Allowable With Prior Written Approval
Certain costs require prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. Costs
requiring prior approval include indirect costs, some direct costs such as
equipment, insurance and indemnification, and preagreement costs. Again,
reference to cost principles and consultation with DEPARTMENT officials
should eliminate any questions and possible rejection of incurred costs.
13. Unallowable Costs
Certain costs are commonly disallowed. These unallowable costs include:
bad debts
contingencies
contributions and donations
entertainment
fines and penalties
interest and other financial costs
underrecovery of costs under grant agreements
See Section XI, D.3., "Financial Guidelines For Grants Management"
(CA-FORM9)
Exhibit No. III
Page Four
Once again, whether a cost is unallowable depends upon the applicable cost
principles to the agreement. Failure to clarify any question whether a cost
is unallowable or allowable may result in its disallowance by the DEPARTMENT.
(CA-FORM10)
CITY OF RENTON
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - 7_anetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry
Assistant City Attorneys
March 15, 1988
TO: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director
FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE: Mood Control Assistance Account Program
Interlocal Agreements
Dear Dick:
T have reviewed the agreements as above captioned and
approved as to legal form.
Warren
I.,JW: as.
cc: May()r
N8.20:18.
they are
NO Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678
For -Use By City Clerk's Office Only
AGENDA ITEM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SUBMITTING
Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Public Works Department
Staff Contact . Bergstrom
Name
SUBJECT: Request for Council arinptinn of a
Resolution to give Mayor and City Clerk
authority to execute documents requesting
allocation of Flood Control Assistance
Account Program Funds.
Exhibits: (Legal Descr., Maps, Etc.)Attach
A. Draft Resolution
B. Department of Ecology Correspondence�J/ i
C.
COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED:
FISCAL IMPACT:
For Agenda Of
Meeting Date
Agenda Status:
Consent
Public Hearing
Correspondence
Ordinance/Resolution
Old Business
New Business
Study Session
Other
Approval:
Legal Dept. Yes X No N/A
Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A
Other Clearance
Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $
Budgeted Transfer Required
SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation)
(Attach additional pages if necessary.)
The proposed resolution is to give the Mayor and City Clerk authority to sign and execute
all necessary documents relating to the request for Washington State Department of Ecology
Flood Control Assistance Account Program funds for the following projects:
1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs,
Maplewood Creek Restoration
PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED:
SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE
DOCUMENTS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE
ACCOUNT PROGRAM
WHEREAS the City of Renton, Washington, has heretofore made
application for certain State Aid Grant Projects; and
WHEREAS the implementation of said projects requires the
execution of certain documents relating thereto including the allocation
and expenditure of State Flood Control Assistance Account Program
(FCAAP) Funds, NOW THEREFORE,
FOLLOWS:
correct.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO RESOLVE AS
SECTION I: The above recitals are hereby found to be true and
SECTION II: The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Renton,
Washington are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver
unto appropriate governmental agencies any and all documents relating to
the allocation and expenditure of FCAAP Funding including the following
project description, to -wit:
1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs
Maplewood Creek Restoration
which said project includes certain Flood Control and storm drainage
construction improvements.
- 1 -
RESOLUTION NO.
SECTION III: The City Clerk is hereby.authorized to certify
this Resolution in sufficient copies and furnish same to the appropriate
governmental agencies.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS DAY OF
Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk
, 1987.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR THIS DAY OF , 1987.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Barbara--y , Mayor
- I _ 4. C!-4 y r--�
- 2 -
�•y '�' CITY OF RENTON
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Earl Clymer, Mayor
Richard C. Houghton, Director
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 14, 1988
TO: Larry Warren, City Attorney
FROM: Richard C. Houghton, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Flood Control Assistance Account Program
Interlocal Agreements
For vour review and approval, you will find attached two interlocal agreements between the City of
Renton and K ing County. The agreements are for assistance in financing the Maplewood Creek
Restoration project, and the lower Cedar River East Bank Repairs project.
"I he lower Cedar Riker project has already been completed. Due to the delay in the funding process
we obtained awpro%-11 from the Washington State Department of Ecology to perform the work, pi for
to the execution of the agreement. This is covered in Exhibit No. 1, Page 3, Item F.
Thank you.
Richard C. Houghton
cm/lw-fcaap/cep: jlm
Attachments
200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2569
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 2711
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE
DOCUMENTS RELATING TO REQUEST FOR WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FLOOD CONTROL ASSISTANCE ACCOUNT
PROGRAM.
WHEREAS the City of Renton, Washington, has heretofore made
application for certain State Aid Grant Projects; and
WHEREAS the implementation of said projects requires the
execution of certain documents relating thereto including the
allocation and expenditure of State Flood Control Assistance
Account Program (FCAAP) Funds, NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON DO RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I: The above recitals are hereby found to be true
and correct.
SECTION II: The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Renton,
Washington are hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver unto appropriate governmental agencies any and all
documents relating to the allocation and expenditure of FCAAP
Funding including the following project descriptions, to -wit:
1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs; and
Maplewood Creek Restoration
which said projects includes certain Flood Control and storm
drainage construction improvements.
RESOLUTION NO. 2711
SECTION III: The City Clerk is hereby authorized to certify
this Resolution in sufficient copies and furnish same to the
appropriate governmental agencies.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of March, 1988.
Marilyn 41. Pactersen Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 21st day of March, 1988.
1
Ea . Clymer, M or
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Lawre a J. Warr City Attorney
RES:10/3/15/88
-2-
February 22. 1988 Renton City Council Minutt..a, Page 60
OLD BUSINESS Council President Keolker-Wheeler presented a Committee of the Whole
Committee of the Whole report indicating that following presentation by the Renton Park Department
Parks: Cedar River Trail staff, it was recommended that the Council adopt the Cedar River Trail
Natural Zone Master Plan Natural Zone Master Plan.
King County: A presentation was given by representatives of King County's Solid Waste
Presentation on Solid Division regarding recycling issues and solid waste management issues. The
Waste Management and Committee of the Whole recommended that Council refer the general topics
Recycling of solid waste management and recycling to the Committee of the Whole for
future workshop discussions.
Policy: Revision of The Committee of the Whole discussed new procedures for improving Council
Council Procedures and efficiency and the need for more depth and discussion of major policy issues
Council Meeting Schedule facing the City. These ideas were also discussed at the recent Council retreat.
The Committee of the Whole recommended that Council adopt the following
changes:
a. Council meetings will be at 7:30 p.m. the first four Mondays of each
month.
b. The first and third Mondays will be regular Council meetings with full
agendas including public hearings. The second and fourth Mondays will
be abbreviated agendas (essential business only) followed by Committee
of the Whole work sessions on topics of interest to the Council.
Thursday Committee of the Whole meetings will be cancelled unless
Council determines a need for an additional meeting.
The Committee of the Whole recommended that the Council Meeting Policies
and Procedures be sent to the Ways and Means Committee for revision.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Council President Keolker-
Wheeler advised that the new procedure will begin at the Council meeting of
3/7/88.
Court Case: E & H Council President Keolker-Wheeler requested a status report on the two
Properties Rezone lawsuits filed on the E & H Properties rezone. City Attorney Warren
reported that settlements have been reached and lawsuits filed by Custom
Cabinet Sales and North Renton/Kennydale Neighborhood Defense Fund
have both been dismissed. MOVED BY KEOLKER, SECONDED BY
MATHEWS, COUNCIL CANCEL THE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED
FOR 2/29/88 ON THE E & H PROPERTIES REZONE. CARRIED.
Legislature: Legislative
Updates
Utilities Committee
Release of Easement:
Spieker Partners, Koll
Business Center, RE-001-
88
Public Works: 1988 Cedar
River Channel Dredging
and Bank Repairs,
Maplewood Creek, DOE
Funds
Council President Keolker-Wheeler thanked Charmaine Baker, Community
Relations Specialist, for providing well -formatted legislative updates on bills
before the Legislature which are of interest to Council.
Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending
Council concurrence in the recommendation of the Board of Public Works for
approval of the request by Spieker Partners for release of easement over Lots
7 and 8 of Koll Business Center located in the vicinity of Lind Avenue and
SW 43rd Street, RE-001-88. No monetary remuneration is required.
MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Utilities Committee Chairman Hughes presented a report recommending
concurrence in the Public Works Department recommendation to authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and execute all necessary documents
relating to the request for Washington Department of Ecology Flood Control
Assistance Account Program Funds for the 1988 Cedar River Channel
dredging and bank repairs and Maplewood Creek restoration. The
Committee also recommended that the enabling resolution be referred to Ways
and Means Committee. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY
MATHEWS, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE
COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
FEBRUARY 22, 1988
SPIEKER PARTNERS RELEASE OF A PORTION OF AN EASEMENT IN KOLL BUSINESS CENTER
Referred 2 1 88
The Utilities Committee recommends Council concur in the recommendation of the
Board of Public Works to release said portion of the existing easement. No
monetary remuneration is required.
l
'19-88 CEDAR RIVER CHANNEL DREDGING FUNDING CONTRACT WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF
ECOLOGY Referred 12 14 87
The Utilities Committee recommends Council concur with the Public Works
Department recommendation to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign and
execute all necessary documents relating to the request for Washington
Department of Ecology Flood Control Assistance Program Funds and further
recommends the enabling resolution be referred to the Ways and Means Committee.
ACQUISITION OF CLEMENTS PROPERTY ON NE SUNSET BLVD. FOR WATER RESERVOIR AND
STORM RETENTION hie Ell e 1
The Utilities Committee recommends Council concur in the recommendation of the
Public Works Department to refer this subject to the City Attorney and request
that his office enter into negotiations for the purchase of said property by
the City of Renton Utilities Department.
To' er ughes, irman
Nancy Math s
Toni Nelson
December 14, 1987
Monday, 8:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Municipal Building
Council Chambers
MINUTE
Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and
called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; NANCY L. MATHEWS,
COUNCIL MEMBERS RICHARD M. STREDICKE, KATHY A. KEOLKER, ROBERT J.
HUGHES, EARL CLYMER. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY
CLYMER, ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER REED BE EXCUSED.
CARRIED. (Councilman Reed arrived at 8:51 p.m.)
CITY STAFF IN
ATTENDANCE
PRESS
APPROVAL OF
COUNCIL MINUTES
CONSENT AGENDA
CAG: 87-075, South 7th
Street and Rainier
Avenue South
CAG: 87-077, CBD
Sanitary Sewer
Replacement and Renton
Hill Alley Sewer, Phase II
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City
Attorney; MICHAEL W. PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; MAXINE E.
MOTOR, City Clerk; CAPTAIN DON PERSSON, Police Department.
Kathy Hall, Valley Daily News
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF DECEMBER 7, 1987, AS PRESENTED.
CARRIED.
Items on the Consent Agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
City Clerk reported bid opening 12/4/87 for S. 7th Street and Rainier
Avenue S. Street and Intersection Improvements; 3 bids; Engineer's estimate:
$251,469.09. Refer to Transportation Committee.
City Clerk reported bid opening 12/9/87 for CBD Sanitary Sewer
Replacement; 13 bids; Engineer's estimate: $193,022.82. Refer to Utilities
Committee. (See later action.)
Claim: Tindall, CL-56-87 Claim for damages in the amount of $85.79 filed by Alicia Tindall, 12859 NE
84th Street, Kirkland, for vehicle damage allegedly incurred as a result of
hitting broken piece of cement divider at intersection of S. 26th Street and
Benson Road (10/29/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service.
Claim: McCollam, CL- Claim for damages in the amount of $703.56 filed by Catherine McCollam,
57-87 16952 157th Avenue SE, Renton, for vehicle damage allegedly incurred when
struck by cast iron collector dislodged by City water line workers above
Renton Car Wash (08/27/87). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service.
Claim: Taitano, CL-58-87 Claim for damages in the amount of $355.64 filed by Richard Taitano, 2147
NE 12th, Renton, for vehicle damage allegedly incurred in accident with
police vehicle at 800 Edmonds Avenue NE (12/08/87). Refer to City
Attorney and insurance service.
Plat: Preliminary, Chaves, Hearing Examiner recommended approval of Hernando Chaves Preliminary
PP-035-87 Plat request with conditions to subdivide 3.46 acres located at the northeast
corner of NE 20th Street and Aberdeen Avenue NE into 16 single family
lots, File No. PP-035-87. Council concur.
Public Works: 1988 Cedar, Public Works Department requested review of documents related to
River Channel Dredging Washington State Department of Ecology Flood Control Assistance Account
and Bank Repairs, Program funds for the 1988 Cedar River Channel dredging and bank repairs,
Maplewood Creek, Maplewood Creek restoration. Refer to Utilities Committee.
Department of Ecology
Funds
MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY KEOLKER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
For.Use By City Clerk's Office Orly
A.I. N
AGENDA ITEM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SUBMITTING
Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Public Works Department
Staff Contact . Bergstrom
Name
SUBJECT: _RequeSt for Cnrnmril ndnptinn of a
Resolution to give Mayor and City Clerk
authority to execute documents requesting
allocation of Flood Control Assistance
Account Program Funds,
Exhibits: (Legal Descr., Maps, Etc.)Attach
A. Draft Resolution
B. Department of Ecology Correspondence
C
COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED:
For Agenda Of %.2 - /5%— iJ 7
Meeting Date
Agenda Status:
Consent
Public Hearing
Correspondence
Ordinance/Resolution
Old Business
New Business
Study Session
Other
Approval:
Legal Dept. Yes X No N/A
Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A
Other Clearance
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation-
Transfer Required $
Budgeted
SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation)
(Attach additional pages if necessary.)
The proposed resolution is to give the Mayor and Clay Clerk authority to sign and execute
all necessary documents relating to the request for Washington State Department of Ecology
Flood Control Assistance Account Program funds for the following projects:
1988 Cedar River Channel Dredging and Bank Repairs,
Maplewood Creek Restoration
PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED:
SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITh DOCUMENTATION.
ANDREA BEATTY RINIhER=
Director a�
7vvy
STATE OF W,ASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Mail Stop PV- 1 1 • Olympia. Washington 98504-8.71 1 • (206)
December 17, 1987
Mr. Donald J. LaBelle
Director
King County Department of Public Works
900 King County Administration Buildig
500 Fourth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
Re: Flood Control Assistance Account
Program (FCAAP) Grant No. G0088074
(1987) Lower Cedar River - East Bank Repairs
Dear Mr. LaBelle:
1
,DEC IL1MT
ENGINEERING U&I.
9-6M) CITY OF RENTON
Enclosed are two unsigned copies of the subject agreement for the
above referenced grant. Your attention is directed to the effec-
tive date and the termination date (indicated in paragraph "C") of
the agreement which means that the agreement allows payment to be
made for work done at any time between these dates. Unless other-
wise indicated in paragraph "C", work done prior to final signa-
ture by Ecology on the grant agreement is ineligible for reim-
bursement. Please sign for the grantee following paragraph 110"
and return the two original agreements, in entirety, to us. The
grant will then be signed by the Department, one copy of the duly
executed document will then be returned to you. Please be sure to
use the referenced grant number in all correspondence, billings,
etc.
Another purpose of this letter is to review the following FCAAP
requirements. Prior to the final approval of the grant agreement
by Ecology, the following must be accomplished:
1. Plan approval - RCW 86.26.040
The county engineer must approve all plans for each project.
The approved plans must be submitted to the Department of
Ecology for approval in consultation with the Department of
Fisheries and the Department of Game. Please submit to us
any plans which may supplement those previously submitted
with your application.
Mr. Donald J. LaBelle
December 17, 1987
Page Two
2. Floodplain management activities RCW 86 26 030; WAC
173.45.050
The Department of Ecology must find and approve that local
authorities are engaging in floodplain management activities
by:
a. Participating in and meeting all of the requirements of
the NFIP.
b. Restriction of land uses within the meander belt or
floodway to only flood compatible uses. (This require-
ment has been met for your county.)
3. Flood control budget report - RCW 86.26.080
Any municipal corporation with an approved projects must
report their adopted budget for flood control purposes to the
County Engineer. County Engineers must submit these reports
along with their county's flood control budget report to the
Department of Ecology. Please submit the appropriate reports
for the 1987-1989 biennium.
4. Permits or authorizations - WAC 173.145.070
The applicant must acquire all necessary federal, state, and
local permits or authorizations prior to construction.
Please provide information copies of these permits or autho-
rizations and copies of sub -agreements with applicants,
construction contracts, and construction schedules to
facilitate the department's inspection scheduling.
5. Comprehensive Flood Control Management Plan - RCW 86 26 050
(SHB 380), RCW 86.26 105; and WAC 173.145.040
These plans must be completed and adopted by the appropriate
local authority within three years after the county
engineer's certification that a plan is being prepared. The
certification process, done in conjunction with Ecology, must
be accomplished prior to final grant authorization.
Prior to the final grant payment, the following applies:
Supervision, inspection of work - RCW 86 26 040 WAC
173.145.130
The County Engineer shall supervise and provide inspection of
the construction work. The Department of Ecology shall
also monitor and inspect the project work. A final inspec-
Mr. Donald J. LaBelle
December 17, 1987
Page Three
tion shall be made by the County Engineer, the applicant and
the Department of Ecology, and a written report of the
inspection prepared within 30 days of the inspection. "As
built" construction plans shall be submitted to Ecology.
We hope this FCAAP project grant program will materially assist in
the maintenance of your flood control facilities. If you ever
have questions or suggestions about these grants or this program,
please call me at 459-6776 (SCAN 585-6776).
Si7rely
Carl Glatze
FCAAP Grants Officer
Shorelands & Coastal Zone
Management Program
cc: Jerry Creek,
King County Surface Water Management
Charles Price, City of Renton
ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER
Ihrector
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Mail Stop PV- l I • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459{i(X1[ll � C
kgsi
December 11, 1987
F,
Dear Potential Grantee Applicant:
Re: Availability of Flood Control Assistance Account
Program (FCAAP) Emergency Funds
The Department of Ecology wishes to remind you of the availability
of financial assistance for emergency flood control projects which
may become necessary during the forthcoming flood season. The
funds are available through Ecology to counties and other
municipal corporations for flood control maintenance work. The
information that follows summarizes the emergency portion of the
flood control program.
Criteria:
The applicant must be a county or other municipal corporation
responsible for flood control maintenance work.
The project must provide a benefit to important and essential
public property or facilities.
The project must be done immediately to preserve life or
property threatened as a direct result of unusual,
unforeseeable, and emergent flood conditions.
The work must be necessary to preserve or restore natural or
man-made flood control facilities to their former nature.
The work must be of an emergency nature necessary for reasons
formally declared by the appropriate local authority.
Administration:
The FCAAP contribution shall not exceed eighty (80) percent
of the eligible cost.
Monies shall be made available on a first -come first -serve
basis.
Monies are paid on a reimbursable basis following
construction.
Procedure:
Emergency funds will be made available for projects which have
been given approval for funds by the appropriate representative of
Ecology prior to beginning construction. In the event of an
emergency, the applicant should contact one of the individuals
3
December 11, 1987
Page 2
indicated at the end of this letter. If necessary, verbal
approval may be given to the applicant by phone that emergency
funds will be available. The applicant will still be required to
obtain the appropriate permits and authorization prior to
construction.
An application must be submitted through the County Engineer to
Ecology. The application must include the following information:
Project Description
Detailed Cost Estimate
Construction Plans and Schedules
Description of Public Benefits
Copy of Emergency Declaration
Approval of County Engineer
Upon receipt of the application, Ec4logy will execute a written
grant agreement with the County. Upon completion of the work, a
final detailed inspection shall be made by the County Engineer
along with representatives of the applicant and Ecology.
Following final inspection, a voucher must be submitted through
the County Engineer to Ecology for reimbursement.
Should an emergency arise which is caused by flooding, or if you
have any other questions regarding the Flood Control Assistance
Account Program, please contact one of the following:
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
EMERGENCY CONTACTS;
Carl Glatze (206) 459-6776 (Office) and 352-5213 (Home)
Jerry Louthain (206) 459-6791 (Office) and 491-4678 (Home)
Sine
C.
Carl Glatze, P.
Floodplain Management Section
Shorelands and Coastal Zone
Management Section
CG:la