Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSWP271819CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: March 21, 1990 TO: Ken Bindara, Building Department e'19`, U FROM: David M. Christenstility Engineer SUBJECT: FAITH COVENANT CHURCH PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS FOR PRE -OCCUPANCY All items addressed in Ron Straka's memo dated January 18, 1990, shall be addressed as stipulated excluding that portion dealing with 103rd St. S.E. and the applicant's driveway connecting to it (Items 5, 8). Item 5 will be addressed and rectified prior to final occupancy. These requirements represent the minimum improvements necessary to insure that storm drainage is controlled and that the erosion potential is kept to a minimum, as well as ensure that the water and sanitary sewer departments records are current. The previous memo is made an attachment to this correspondence for your reference. If you have any questions, please contact me at 277-6212. DCM: jg Attachment CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 1990 TO: Ken Bindara, Building Department FROM: Ron Straka, Utility Engineering SUBJECT: PRE -OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR THE FAITH COVENANT CHURCH The Pre -occupancy Permit for the Faith Covenant Church should be withheld until a Construction Permit for the on -site and off -site improvements has been issued. Although a Building Permit was issued for this project, a Construction Permit was never issued for the proposed improvements. The on -site and off -site improvements which remain to be constructed and inspected are as follows: 1) The on -site storm water collection system. 2) The on -site detention pond with oil/water separator, control manhole, and pond inlet and outlet pipes. 3) Some of the sites silt fence is installed, but not all of it. The silt fence which is installed is in a state of disrepair and will need to be fixed prior to the start of any more construction. 4) The on -site paving and curb installation is not complete. 5) The future drive which will connect to 103rd St. S.E., when it is constructed, has not been installed or graded. When 103rd St. S.E. is constructed, the existing driveway will be closed at Carr Road and a new alignment be established to intersect 103rd S.E. per the Hearing Examiner's Report for CU-051-88. When the existing driveway is closed, the concrete driveway will have to be replaced with sidewalk meeting City standards. This work in City right-of-way will require a Right -of -Way Construction Permit at the time of construction. 6) The drainage ditch along Carr Road will need to be rechanneled and cleaned to insure that the flows in the ditch do not erode the proposed detention pond banks. 7) Sanitary sewer and water service for the development is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The side sewer and water service for the building was supposed to be inspected by a City inspector, which never happened. Faith Covenant Church will be required to provide the Utility Department with a letter from Soos Creek accepting the installation of the utility services along with the as - built drawings of the side sewer and water service. If these services were never inspected, we may require testing and verification that the services were installed per City standards. A City construction inspector is only assigned when a Ken Bindera January 18, 1990 Page Two Construction Permit is issued. If no Construction Permit is issued, then no inspector is assigned to inspect utility installation and overall site construction. 8) There has been some discussion as to who is responsible for the construction of 103rd St. S.E. In the Hearing Examiner's decision section of the report, it was indicated that the City of Renton would construct the roadway. This new roadway serves the City of Renton's new Talbot Hill Reservoir. The property for the . reservoir was purchased by the City from Faith Covenant Church. The purchase price of the City parcel of land was assessed to reflect that the site will be served by a fully -improved roadway. The purchase agreement for the parcel of land needs to be researched to see if the contract indicated that Faith Covenant Church or the City would be responsible for the construction of 103rd St. S.E. Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, was involved with the purchase of this parcel of land and may be able to clarify this topic. We have received and approved Engineering Drawings for these improvements which remain. Although these plans do not meet our drafting standards and lack quality and clarity, we have accepted them since construction is 50-60% complete. The remaining information needed for the issuance of the Construction Permit is the following: 1) Cost Data Inventory - A complete detailed list of items, quantities, and costs associated with on -site improvements along with a separate inventory of the items for off -site improvements. 2) A Pre -Construction Conference must lie held prior to the start of any more construction. The owners of Faith Covenant Church should be instructed to contact the Public Works Department for additional information required for the issuance of the Construction Permit. In conclusion, the Pre -occupancy Permit for the Faith Covenant Church should be withheld until the Construction Permit for the remaining items to be constructed is issued. Once the Construction Permit has been issued, then a Pre -occupancy Permit may be allowed depending if the other Public Works Departments concur. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at 235- 2631. FAITHCHR/RJs:1f V �C .szz� i z±:� s+- E - �Lti 72z a •f BRA vy Gopy CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 1990 TO: Ken Bindara, Building Department FROM: Ron Straka, Utility Engineering SUBJECT: PRE -OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR THE FAITH COVENANT CHURCH The Pre -occupancy Permit for the Faith Covenant Church should be withheld until a Construction Permit for the on -site and off -site improvements has been issued. Although a Building Permit was issued for this project, a Construction Permit was never issued for the proposed improvements. The on -site and off -site improvements which remain to be constructed and inspected are as follows: 1) The on -site storm water collection system. 2) The on -site detention pond with oil/water separator, control manhole, and pond inlet and outlet pipes. 3) Some of the sites silt fence is installed, but not all of it. The silt fence which is installed is in a state of disrepair and will need to be fixed prior to the start of any more construction. 4) The on -site paving and curb installation is not complete. 5) The future drive which will connect to 103rd St. S.E., when it is constructed, has not been installed or graded. When 103rd St. S.E. is constructed, the existing driveway will be closed at Carr Road and a new alignment be established to intersect 103rd S.E. per the Hearing Examiner's Report for CU-051-88. When the existing driveway is closed, the concrete driveway will have to be replaced with sidewalk meeting City standards. This work in City right-of-way will require a Right -of -Way Construction Permit at the time of construction. 6) The drainage ditch along Carr Road will need to be rechanneled and cleaned to insure that the flows in the ditch do not erode the proposed detention pond banks. 7) Sanitary sewer and water service for the development is provided by Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. The side sewer and water service for the building was supposed to be inspected by a City inspector, which never happened. Faith Covenant Church will be required to provide the Utility Department with a letter from Soos Creek accepting the installation of the utility services along with the as - built drawings of the side sewer and water service. If these services were never inspected, we may require testing and verification that the services were installed per City standards. A City construction inspector is only assigned when a A-Nfl MvooI(;i TF AlFcE--a54py Ken Bindera January 18, 1990 Page Two Construction Permit is issued. If no Construction Permit is issued, then no inspector is assigned to inspect utility installation and overall site construction. 8) There has been some discussion as to who is responsible for the construction of 103rd St. S.E. In the Hearing Examiner's decision section of the report, it was indicated that the City of Renton would construct the roadway. This new roadway serves the City of Renton's new Talbot Hill Reservoir. The property for the reservoir was purchased by the City from Faith Covenant Church. The purchase price of the City parcel of land was assessed to reflect that the site will be served by a fully -improved roadway. The purchase agreement for the parcel of land needs to be researched to see if the contract indicated that Faith Covenant Church or the City would be responsible for the construction of 103rd St. S.E. Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, was involved with the purchase of this parcel of land and may be able to clarify this topic. We have received and approved Engineering Drawings for these improvements which remain. Although these plans do not meet our drafting standards and lack quality and clarity, we have accepted them since construction is 50-60% complete. The remaining information needed following: Permit is the 1) Cost Data Inventory - A complete detailed list of items, quantities, and costs associated with on -site improvements along with a separate inventory of the items for off -site improvements. 2) A Pre -Construction Conference must be held prior to the start of any more construction. The owners of Faith Covenant Church should be instructed to contact the Public Works Department for additional information required for the issuance of the Construction Permit. In conclusion, the Pre -occupancy Permit for the Faith Covenant Church should be withheld until the Construction Permit for the remaining items to be constructed is issued. Once the Construction Permit has been issued, then a Pre -occupancy Permit may be allowed depending if the other Public Works Departments concur. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at 235- 2631. FAITHCHR/RJS:If , lb T4 L1 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SUMMARY OF ACTION: PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: January 9, 1989 CITY OF RENTON D JAN 9 1989 FAITH COVENANT CHUR E C E I V E File No.: CU-051-88 I I I I South Carr Road Conditional Use request to expand the existing church complex by building a structure of approximately 4800 sq. ft. to provide space for religious activities and administrative offices. Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on December 13, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing opened on December 20, 1988 at 10:54 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Grading Plan Exhibit #4 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #5 - Elevation Plan The hearing was opened on December 20, 1988 witli the report being presented by Senior Planner Jeanette Samek-McKague. Information from the presentation brought out such facts as the entire 10.86 acre parcel was annexed into the city in March, 1988 and in April, 1988 a rezone to R-1 was approved by the city. The church portion of the property is 3 acres and contains a greenbelt on the site; no additional road systems are necessary on the property at this time; the ERC issued a determination of non -significance with mitigated conditions consisting of the following: the applicant is to develop a plan for re-routing the on -site stream; develop a plan for erosion control and storm water drainage management; water down the site during construction to control dust emissions; develop an approved haul route; relocate the proposed driveway to align more closely with I03rd S.E. and provide the city with a bond to ensure street clean-up during construction. Continuing, a review was given of the criteria for a Conditional Use request noting this request meets the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive flan; a church is a permitted use in an R-1 zone with a Conditional Use Permit; this proposal will not create an over -concentration of this type of use in the neighborhood; there are no foreseeable adverse impacts to the site or community; the proposal meets all setback and heiglit requirements and it is felt the use will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Mrs. Samek-McKague said parking and circulation have been provided for with 19 additional stalls, and it was noted staff suggested a sidewalk be extended along the east side of the existing parking lot and wrap around the last parking stall nearest the existing building to provide for Faith Covenant Church CU-051-88 January 9, 1989 Page 2 better pedestrian circulation; no noise or glare concerns have been expressed by adjacent properties, and landscaping criteria has been met. It was pointed out that this Conditional Use request is limited to just this addition and is not applicable to any possible future additions on the site. Concluding, it is the recommendation of staff that this proposal be approved subject to the applicant meeting the mitigated conditions of the ERC, the extension of the sidewalk be completed, the relocation of the driveway to the site from Carr Road to 103rd Avenue be completed prior to occupancy of the new complex, and the payment of the fee assessed for the LID. The Senior Planner had no further comments. Testifying in favor of the proposal and representing the applicant was Richard Swanson Architect for the nroiect. 5224 - 12th East Suite L Tacoma 98424. Mr. Swanson advised that the applicant has been in touch with the Department of Fisheries regarding the relocation and preservation of a small stream on the property; the applicant would like not to have to move the driveway until the construction at 103rd by the city is completed (which will help alleviate any safety problems); the applicant realizes the bond will be necessary at the time the permit is issued and acknowledged the understanding that any future expansions on the site will need to be brought in under a new Conditional Use request. Swanson continued stating the project will be a total of 5500 sq. ft. (3800 sq. ft. on the lower level and 1700 sq. ft. on the upper level). The proposal fits into the topography of the land and makes the access at grade on both levels of the building for either moving or use by the handicapped even though there are interior stairways, and permits the applicant to use less of the land for building. Ile requested an expeditious response from the Examiner on this matter and had no objection to the Examiner's request for an additional week to consider this request due to the holiday weeks forthcoming. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Faith Covenant Church, filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of the existing church complex. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #l. 3. 'File Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non -Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. 6. The subject site is located at I I I I South Carr Road. The site is on the west side of Carr road immediately south of the newly dedicated 103rd Avenue S.E. which serves or will serve the new City of Renton Reservoir. 7. The site was annexed into the city with the adoption of Ordinance 4142, enacted by the City Council in March, 1988. The site was automatically classified as R-1 (Single Family; Lot size - 7,200 sq. ft.) upon annexation by the adoption of Ordinance 4151, enacted by the City Council in April, 1988. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of low density multiple family yses and.,gr enbelt, lout, does not mandate such development without consideration of other' polic�iestof the�rplan. 9. The immediate area is developed p primarily with single family uses. The;aEe>as to'the`wdst are influence(] by the location of the Valley Medical Center and reflect more intense land uses including medical office buildings and multiple family uses. 10. The subject site is approximately 10.86 acres in area, of this, approximately 3.77 acres will be used for the church complex. Some of the additional acreage is used as a nursery. The irregularly shaped parcel is defined on its north by the curving alignment of Carr Road. If the Parcel were broken down into thirds, the northerly third (that portion bounded by Carr Road) would be almost triangular, while the remaining southerly two-thirds are generally rectangular. f f Faith Covenant Church CU-051-88 January 9, 1989 Page 3 11. The parcel is severely sloped from the north to the south, dropping approximately 75 to 100 feet over a distance of approximately 659 feet. 12. An existing church building is located along the north margin of the site on a relatively level step in the slope. 13. The new two-story building, which is 31 feet high, would be located slightly downslope of the existing building and will take advantage of another break in the slope. The new building will be stepped into the hillside slightly. The building, by utilizing the grade differences, will be accessible at grade from both of its floors. A ramp on the east side will bridge a small gulf between the parking lot and the second floor and will also provide access to the second floor. 14. The new structure will contain approximately 5,500 square feet distributed over the two floors. The first floor foot print will be approximately 3,800 square feet. The second floor would step in and would be smaller, approximately 1,700 square feet. 15. The driveway serving the existing church runs generally north and intersects Carr Road. The new southerly extension of 103rd Avenue S.E. creates another intersection immediately north of this driveway. These two intersections are very close. Staff has recommended that the existing driveway for the site be closed and that a new driveway be created which intersects 103rd rather than directly intersecting Carr Road. Then 103rd would be used to gain access to Carr Road. The applicant has agreed to this recommendation. 16. A small stream which runs through the site will be relocated under plans approved by the Department of Fisheries. In addition, a detention pond located near the northwest corner of the site will provide storm water capacity. 17. The applicant will provide nineteen (19) additional parking spaces which will include 2 handicapped stalls. With the addition, handicapped stalls will be located at both the upper and lower levels of the new building. 18. The applicant will provide landscaping around the entire complex as demonstrated in Exhibit 4. A combination of larger plantings and ground cover will be utilized. 19. Staff recommended that the applicant provide a pedestrian link between the existing church building and this new building to delineate an aisle across the driveway. 20. Tile existing church and new building will cover approximately 1.3 percent of the lot. The applicant also submitted illustrative plans for an additional expansion on either side of the new building. Those plans are not subject to this review. Any further additions to the church will be subject to separate review. 21. The site is served by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 22. The subject site is located within the 43rd Street improvement district. A mitigation fee of $22.97 per trip was initially based upon 4,800 square feet. Tile fee is applicable to the 5,500 square feet. Tile church is anticipated to generate approximately 7.699 trips per thousand square feet. Staff further estimated that approximately 52 percent of the traffic would use the 43rd and Talbot intersection. The fee is, therefore, $505.78 CONCLUSIONS The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; C. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; Faith Covenant Church CU-051-88 January 9, 1989 Page 4 h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights -of -way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested Conditional Use Permit is justified. 2. While the site is generally designated for low density multiple family uses in the Comprehensive Plan, that Plan also demonstrates that churches, when appropriately designed and located, are suitable in residential zones. This church is located on a rather isolated parcel. The isolation is derived from both the size and topography. The church is located in the middle of a larger site where steep slopes isolate the church from surrounding development. 3. In addition, the site's neighboring uses will not be adversely affected by the proposed expansion. The reservoir up the slope will not be affected, nor does it appear that the church will affect. any adjoining uses. 4. Under the existing land use pattern in the area, there is no reason to explore the issue of community need for the proposed use, if that question is relevant to the location of churches. 5. Tile two-story church's scale is similar to other structures in the general area and is smaller than some of the newer office buildings down the hill to the west. The fact that a 31 foot building will be stepped into a slope which drops approximately 100 feet will also serve to minimize any incompatibilities. 6. The nineteen parking stalls are in addition to the 30 existing stalls. The total complement should suffice for this complex.. The location of handicapped stalls at both levels permits access to both floors of the new building. 7. The applicant has agreed to improve the circulation around the existing building and provide more of a link between the existing church and the new building. To some extent the slopes will hamper circulation around the new building by pedestrians, but a complete system of sidewalks should permit passage around the complex. 8. The new driveway linking the site with 103rd, and the elimination of the direct drive to Carr Road, will improve the efficiency and safety of Carr Road. The circulation pattern permitting vehicular access around the entire site is efficient, and will provide more than adequate emergency access. 9. Again, the rather isolated nature of the site should prevent any adverse impacts of noise, light or glare from escaping the site. The landscaping proposed by the applicant will also soften the site and screen neighboring properties from the site. 10. Landscaping will be incorporated over the entire site. Focal plantings will surround the new building and will be located to soften future development on the site. The perimeter of the site will also receive new plantings. 11. The services provided by the water and sewer district will not be affected by the new development on the subject site. Carr Road and 103rd both have sufficient capacity to handle any additional traffic generated by the church expansion. The new driveway alignment also will assure that traffic from the site does not impair traffic safety along Carr Road. DECISION The Conditional Use, Permit for the expansion of the church is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall improve the circulation around the existing building and provide a link between the existing church and the new building. Sidewalks shall also continue around the new building. All sidewalk improvements shall be subject to the approval of the city landscape architect. 2. The applicant shall comply wj h the conditions imposed by the ERC. ., ,. , 3. The existing driveway shall closed at Carr Road and a new alignment be established to intersect 103rd S.E. as soon as that roadway is constructed by the city. 4.. The mitigation fee of $505.78 shall be payable with the issuance of the building permit. r Faith Covenant Church CU-051-88 January 9 1989 Page 5 ORDERED THIS 9th day of. January, 1989: VOLA-1 FRED J. KAU , AN HEARING EX MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of January, 1989 to the parties of record: Richard Swanson 5224 - 12th East, Suite L Tacoma, WA 98424 TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of January, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator lion Monaghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson; Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. January 23, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified 'requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in ,the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as . well as Appeals to the City Council. F j A1'. � � „ _ :. ✓, _' � ••r:,.•j):�'I.i,'t�.` .i. is f • � r : — --- 1 ,rig a.,1'.,. }., ; ��•`. '� VALLEY GI:IJERI „t = 'ClAL 9T91ro J0a HOSPITAL , I ° 2, y 11 t 21: : f8 —f' z s 44 a_1 � w / -- a -P ►' �� - P—I P­ t�P.m sn— It J c--------------- ------------ a _L 'ICI � '§'`` ,��' ''+•, ,- 21 it ,,,� LAND USE —ELEMENT Single Family Commercial ........... .......... Low DensityDesity Multi -Family Office Office Park. Medium Density Multi-Fan*y onoonno, 11,10000000nolloo., nnoonon, ,c ... public Quasl-Publlc Olono 0000001 High Density 4 Light Industrial Multi -Family recreation Heavy Industrial Greenbelt Manufacturing Park ,Ono ono( '000 1001 ,Ono C, 111 Multiple Option is ).on I In non o"""""o"o" I-i-6-i", oilo --I fit- ............ M C) h" 7 --7-�:7-- . . . . . . . . . . . T on. T 0 -------- :Mpzmo--. - - - -- - - - - - - r -- - - - - - - --- - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - --- 1A --• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Alp f`-ffil _44Wyk, --�:Mp/m no on I no.n o o o o non nnnnnono o . n no -on- on MP : -/MO ;nnnnn ono Vr/lt ­nn, Orrid, —noonon innnoo nnonnn anon",, In on, on ,onoon n n n no nnnnn 0000.( o"o 0 0 : Q 1, C 'A k.j VI M noon noon non In F Of M Mo. W I Tw� O C r titer, V. L39 :.z 0 4, Z. fil t t"i Zj S=CTI ON Cr W-A I L -ZL-=YA I I U11 ale Aw =;Poo 4w f M B-ET;H- Z- L i- V A.T f. 2 ffS a u T H Cr L S- V A T 1 0 R v7* !Lf:; IMC .. O O ' JAIO x , L N AN -.550 REVISIONS DATE I JOS TtTL9 - CONTINT41 I CONSIXTANTO 17 1 &... "#. Covenant - Fahh Chsch SAL Z I. - 10221 Of- Carr Road Landscape Pion Renton Was1*19ton ASSA Pasta: Bob Bennett (20e) 228-622 V IS iEDLOND ASSO'CIATES, I "—SCAM Aw .Vffcvo • 00"molom A f .L FAITH COVENANT C11.URCH CU-051-88 APPLICANT Faith Covenant Church. TOTAL AREA 1.0.86 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS South Carr Road EXISTING ZONING R-1 EXISTING USE Church Comnlex" PROPOSED USE Church Comnlex Fxnansion COMPREIIENSIVE LAND USE PLAN"Single Fari.ily COMMENTS LOCATED AT 11,11 SOUTH CARR ROAD. 1. t RETENTION/DETENTION CALCS. PERMIT NO. FAITH COVENANT CHU AREA C value UNDEVELOPED RUNOFF COEFF= 1.7 0.i5 AREA C value DEVELOPED RUNOFF COEFF.(C)= 0.99 0.9 0.71 0.25 AREA OF DEVELOPMENT(acres) 1.7 Tc= 15 min. [calculate separately] SEE PG. 25 Add 10 min. for undeveloped, and 5 min for developed areas) C(existing)= 0.15 C(future)= 0.628529 Tc design period(yrs.) RAINFALL INTENSITY(page 371 10 1.17 Q(bypass)= 0 c.f.s. Q(existing) = 0.29835 c.f.s. Q(allow)= 0.29835 c.f.s if area<50 acres and q<20 cfs.) thenQ(exist)=Q(allow) Q(0)= 0.279223 CF/ACRE R/D VOLUME CALCULATIONS TIME EQN.COEFFS. 70500 -25 29.9 (FROM PAGE 191 V(s) COEFF 2820 29.9 25 for desired type of control structure & design period T= 66.89 MIN V(s)= 1494.33 CU.FT/AC. R/D VOL.: 0 CU.FT. V total: 1596.69 CU. FT. net vol: 1596.690 total area [2.42 ac.] 1596.690 cu. ft. ORIFICE CALCULATIONS [APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF ORIFICES] 2 HEAD (in ft.): 3.9 Q(allow)/orifice= 0.149 CFS DETENTION PIPE SIZING DIAMETER OF PIPE AREA OF CROSS SXN. 0 SQ.FT. LENGTH OF PIPE= FT. area: 0 SQ. FT. diameter: 0 FEET OR 0 INCHES FOR MULTIPLE ORIFICE CONTROL STRUCTURE [IF 0(allowabla)>0.3 cfs or diameter > 2.25 inches] UNITS [feet] HEAD1= 3.9 HEA02 2.4 HEAD3= N/A (so. ft) AREA1= . 0.015182 AREA2= 0.019353 AREA3- FR.R [inches] dial: 1.668403 dial: 1.883711 dia3= ERR EROSION/SEDIMENTATION POND SIZING V> CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: January 18, 1990 TO: Ken Bindara, Building Department FROM: Ron Straka, Utility Engineering VA� SUBJECT: PRE -OCCUPANCY PERMIT FOR THE FAITH COVENANT CHURCH The Pre -occupancy Permit for the Faith Covenant Church should be withheld until a Construction Permit for the on -site and off -site improvements has been issued. Although a Building Permit was issued for this project, a Construction Permit was never issued for the proposed improvements. The on -site and off -site improvements which remain to be constructed and inspected are as follows: l) The on -site storm water collection system. 2) The on -site detention pond with oil/water separator, control manhole, and pond inlet and outlet pipes. 3) Some of the sites silt fence is installed, but not all of it. The silt fence which is installed is in a state of disrepair and will need to be fixed prior to the start of any more construction. 4) _ The on -site paving and curb installation is not complete. 5) The future drive which will connect to 103rd St. S.E., when it is constructed, has not been installed or graded. When 103rd St. S.E. is constructed, the existing driveway will be closed at Carr Road and a new alignment be established to intersect 103rd S.E. per the Hearing Examiner's Report for CU-051-88. When the existing driveway is closed, the concrete driveway will have to be replaced with sidewalk meeting City standards. This work in City right-of-way will require a Right -of -Way Construction Permit at the time of construction. 6) The drainage ditch along Carr Road will need to be rechanneled and cleaned to insure that the flows in the ditch do not erode the proposed detention pond banks. 7) Sanitary sewer and water service for the development is provided by Soo Creek Water and Sewer District. The side sewer and water service for the building was supposed to be inspected by a City inspector, which never happened. Faith Covenant Church will be required to provide the Utility Department with a letter from Soos Creek accepting the installation of the utility services along with the as - built drawings of the side sewer and water service. If these services were never inspected, we may require testing and verification that the services were installed per City standards. A City construction inspector is only assigned when a Ken Bindera January 18, 1990 Page Two Construction Permit is issued. If no Construction Permit is issued, then no inspector is assigned to inspect utility installation and overall site construction. 8) There has been some discussion as to who is responsible for the construction of 103rd St. S.E. In the Hearing Examiner's decision section of the report, it was indicated that the City of Renton would construct the roadway. This new roadway serves the City of Renton's new Talbot Hill Reservoir. The property for the reservoir was purchased by the City from Faith Covenant Church. The purchase price of the City parcel of land was assessed to reflect that the site will be served by a fully -improved roadway. The purchase agreement for the parcel of land needs to be researched to see if the contract indicated that Faith Covenant Church or the City would be responsible for the construction of 103rd St. S.E. Ron Olsen, Utility Engineer, was involved with the purchase of this parcel of land and may be able to clarify this topic. We have received and approved Engineering Drawings for these improvements which remain. Although these plans do not meet our drafting standards and lack quality and clarity, we have accepted them since construction is 50-60% complete. The remaining information needed for the issuance of the Construction Permit is the following: 1) Cost Data Inventory - A complete detailed list of items, quantities, and costs associated with on -site improvements along with a separate inventory of the items for off -site improvements. 2) A Pre -Construction Conference must be held prior to the start of any more construction. The owners of Faith Covenant Church should be instructed to contact the Public Works Department for additional information required for the issuance of the Construction Permit. In conclusion, the Pre -occupancy Permit for the Faith Covenant Church should be withheld until the Construction Permit for the remaining items to be constructed is issued. Once the Construction Permit has been issued, then a Pre -occupancy Permit may be allowed depending if the other Public Works Departments concur. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact me at 235- 2631. FAITHCHR/RJ8:1[ i January 9, 1989 OFFICE OF THE IIEARING EXAMINER t1,V;,;'u1q CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION D JAN 9 1989 APPLICANT: FAITH COVENANT CHUB E C E 0 V E File No.: CU-051-88 LOCATION: I I I I South Carr Road SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Conditional Use request to expand the existing church complex by building a structure of approximately 4800 sq. ft. to provide space for religious activities and administrative offices. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on December 13, 1988 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing opened on December 20, 1988 at 10:54 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Grading Plan Exhibit #4 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #5 - Elevation Plan The hearing was opened on December 20, 1988 with the report being presented by Senior Planner Jeanette Samek-McKague. Information from the presentation brought out such facts as the entire 10.86 acre parcel was annexed into the city in March, 1988 and in April, 1988 a rezone to R-1 was approved by the city. Tile church portion of the property is 3 acres and contains a greenbelt on the site; no additional road systems are necessary on the property at this time; the ERC issued a determination of non -significance with mitigated conditions consisting of the following: the applicant is to develop a plan for re-routing the on -site stream; develop a plan for erosion control and storm water drainage management; water clown the site during construction to control dust emissions; develop an approved haul route; relocate the proposed driveway to align more closely with 103rd S.E. and provide the city with a bond to ensure street clean-up during construction. Continuing, a review was given of the criteria for a Conditional Use request noting this request meets the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive flan, a church is a permitted use in an R-1 zone with a Conditional Use Permit; this proposal will not create an over -concentration of this type of use in the neighborhood; there are no foreseeable adverse impacts to the site or community; the proposal meets all setback and height requirements and it is felt the use will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Mrs. Samek-McKague said parking and circulation have been provided for with 19 additional stalls, and it was noted staff suggested a sidewalk be extended along the east side of the existing parking lot and wrap around the last parking stall nearest the existing building to provide for Faith Covenant Church CU-051-88 January 9, 1989 Page 2 better pedestrian circulation; no noise or glare concerns have been expressed by adjacent properties, and landscaping criteria has been met. It was pointed out that this Conditional Use request is limited to just this addition and is not applicable to any possible future additions on the site. Concluding, it is the recommendation of staff that this proposal be approved subject to the applicant meeting the mitigated conditions of the ERC, the extension of the sidewalk be completed, the relocation of the driveway to the site from Carr Road to 103rd Avenue be completed prior to occupancy of the new complex, and the payment of the fee assessed for the LID. The Senior Planner had no further comments. Testifying in favor of the proposal and representing the applicant was Richard Swanson Architect for the nroiect. 5224 - 12th East Suite L. Tacoma 98424. Mr. Swanson advised that the applicant has been in touch with the Department of Fisheries regarding the relocation and preservation of a small stream on the property; the applicant would like not to have to move the driveway until the construction at 103rd by the city is completed (which will help alleviate any safety problems); the applicant realizes the bond will be necessary at the time the permit is issued and acknowledged the understanding that any future expansions on the site will need to be brought in under a new Conditional Use request. Swanson continued stating the project will be a total of 5500 sq. ft. (3800 sq. ft. on the lower level and 1700 sq. ft. on the upper level). The proposal fits into the topography of the land and makes the access at grade on both levels of the building for either moving or use by the handicapped even though there are interior stairways, and permits the applicant to use less of the land for building. Ile requested an expeditious response from the Examiner on this matter and had no objection to the Examiner's request for an additional week to consider this request due to the holiday weeks forthcoming. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:15 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: The applicant, Faith Covenant Church, filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of the existing church complex. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non -Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. There was no opposition from the public regarding the subject proposal. The subject site is located at 1 I I I South Carr Road. The site is on the west side of Carr road immediately south of the newly dedicated 103rd Avenue S.E. which serves or will serve the new City of Renton Reservoir. The site was annexed into the city with the adoption of Ordinance 4142, enacted by the City Council in March, 1988. The site was automatically classified as R-1 (Single Family; Lot size 7,200 sq. ft.) upon annexation by the adoption of Ordinance 4151, enacted by the City Council in April, 1988. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive flan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of low density multiple family uses,and..grrenbelt, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies' of the' plan. ,. 9. The immediate area is developed primarily with single family uses. The'�feas to the'west are ' influenced by the location of the Valley Medical Center and reflect more intense land uses including medical office buildings and multiple family uses. 10. The subject site is approximately 10.86 acres in area, of this, approximately 3.77 acres will be used for the church complex. Some of the additional acreage is used as a nursery. The irregularly shaped parcel is defined on its north by the curving alignment of Carr Road. If the parcel were broken down into thirds, the northerly third (that portion bounded by Carr Road) would be almost triangular, while the remaining southerly two-thirds are generally rectangular. Faith Covenant Church CU-051-88 January 9, 1989 Page 3 11. The parcel is severely sloped from the north to the south, dropping approximately 75 to 100 feet over a distance of approximately 659 feet. 12. An existing church building is located along the north margin of the site on a relatively level step in the slope. 13. The new two-story building, which is 31 feet high, would be located slightly downslope of the existing building and will take advantage of another break in the slope. The new building will be stepped into the hillside slightly. The building, by utilizing the grade differences, will be accessible at grade from both of its floors. A ramp on the east side will bridge a small gulf between the parking lot and the second floor and will also provide access to the second floor. 14. The new structure will contain approximately 5,500 square feet distributed over the two floors. The first floor foot print will be approximately 3,800 square feet. The second floor would step in and would be smaller, approximately 1,700 square feet. :5. The driveway serving the existing church runs generally north and intersects Carr Road. The new southerly extension of 103rd Avenue S.E. creates another intersection immediately north of this driveway. These two intersections are very close. Staff has recommended that the existing driveway for the site be closed and that a new driveway be created which intersects 103rd rather than directly intersecting Carr Road. Then 103rd would be used to gain access to Carr Road. The applicant has agreed to this recommendation. 16. A small stream which runs through the site will be relocated under plans approved by the Department of Fisheries. In addition, a detention pond located near the northwest corner of the site will provide storm water capacity. 17. The applicant will provide nineteen (19) additional parking spaces which will include 2 handicapped stalls. With the addition, handicapped stalls will be located at both the upper and lower levels of the new building. 18. The applicant will provide landscaping around the entire complex as demonstrated in Exhibit 4. A combination of larger plantings and ground cover will be utilized. 19. Staff recommended that the applicant provide a pedestrian link between the existing church building and this new building to delineate an aisle across the driveway. 20. The existing church and new building will cover approximately 1.3 percent of the lot. The applicant also submitted illustrative plans for an additional expansion on either side of the new building. Those plans are not subject to this review. Any further additions to the church will be subject to separate review. 21. The site is served by the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District. 22. The subject site is located within the 43rd Street improvement district. A mitigation fee of $22.97 per trip was initially based upon 4,800 square feet. The fee is applicable to the 5,500 square feet. The church is anticipated to generate approximately 7.699 trips per thousand square feet. Staff further estimated that approximately 52 percent of the traffic would use the 43rd and Talbot intersection. The fee is, therefore, $505.78 CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-748(C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Co►nprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; C. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; Faith Covenant Church CU-051-88 January 9, 1989 Page 4 h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights -of -way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested Conditional Use Permit is justified. 2. While the site is generally designated for low density multiple family uses in the Comprehensive Plan, that Plan also demonstrates that churches, when appropriately designed and located, are suitable in residential zones. This church is located on a rather isolated parcel. The isolation is derived from both the size and topography. The church is located in the middle of a larger site where steep slopes isolate the church from surrounding development. 3. In addition, the site's neighboring uses will not be adversely affected by the proposed expansion. The reservoir up the slope will not be affected, nor does it appear that the church will affect any adjoining uses. 4. Under the existing land use pattern in the area, there is no reason to explore the issue of community need for the proposed use, if that question is relevant to the location of churches. 5. The two-story church's scale is similar to other structures in the general area and is smaller than some of the newer office buildings down the hill to the west. The fact that a 31 foot building will be stepped into a slope which drops approximately 100 feet will also serve to minimize any incompatibilities. 6. The nineteen parking stalls are in addition to the 30 existing stalls. The total complement should suffice for this complex. The location of handicapped stalls at both levels permits access to both floors of the new building. 7. The applicant has agreed to improve the circulation around the existing building and provide more of a link between the existing church and the new building. To some extent the slopes will hamper circulation around the new building by pedestrians, but a complete system of sidewalks should permit passage around the complex. 8. The new driveway linking the site with 103rd, and the elimination of the direct drive to Carr Road, will improve the efficiency and safety of Carr Road. The circulation pattern permitting vehicular access around the entire site is efficient, and will provide more than adequate emergency access. 9. Again, the rather isolated nature of the site should prevent any adverse impacts of noise, light or glare from escaping the site. The landscaping proposed by the applicant will also soften the site and screen neighboring properties from the site. 10. Landscaping will be incorporated over the entire site. Focal plantings will surround the new building and will be located to soften future development on the site. The perimeter of the site will also receive new plantings. 11. The services provided by the water and sewer district will not be affected by the new development on the subject site. Carr Road and 103rd both have sufficient capacity to handle any additional traffic generated by the church expansion. The new driveway alignment also will assure that traffic from the site does not impair traffic safety along Carr Road. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of the church is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall improve the circulation around the existing building and provide a link between the existing church and the new building. Sidewalks shall also continue around the new building. All sidewalk improvements shall be subject to the approval of the city landscape architect. 2. The applicant shall comply wi h the conditions imposed by the ERC. 3. The existing driveway shall closed at Carr Road and a new alignment be established to intersect 103rd S.E. as soon as that roadway is constructed by the city. 4. The mitigation fee of $505.78 shall be payable with the issuance of the building permit. 'Faith Covenant Church CU-051-88 b January 9, 1989 Page 5 I ? ORDERED THIS 9th day of. January, 1989. 7;zv-k � voLL.,L__ FRED J. KAU AN HEARING EX MINER TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of January, 1989 to the parties of record: Richard Swanson 5224 - 12th East, Suite L Tacoma, WA 98424 TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of January, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Don Monaghan, Acting Engineering Supervisor Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Ronald Nelson, Building Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney John Adamson;, Developmental Program Coordinator Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title 1V, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. January 23, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal ,be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified ••''requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in ,the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication ,permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would alllow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. it • 1 1 • 7 i i JA P 1 VAIIEY GI'.rJERnL I 9Ts��o �°° IIOSPITAL I _1-,-;{„ '% p• Q a If1 0 M -f•i.� t a• i� � 7e ��. � 4_ o, 4 p 41 � l , t 44 41 / - -- O-P P, -� P-I rff-F- j °a I —_--�___�— S a. H n, • f :', .. � . 1, �' . 7o a. �1 i�• ,. fill A. 9 j1 , LAND USE ELEMENT Single Family Low Density ' Multi -Family . Medium Density Multi -Family High Density Multi -Family k recreation Greenbelt Commercial Office / Office Park ,00°onoo OOonono 000noonr nnnnnnn Public / Quasi -Public 0000000 Light Industrial '.'.'. Heavy Industrial Manufacturing Park / Multiple Option •.]ono .. .. .. ........ --_ -_ - - nonnnnnnoo try •'•nonoo onoo non / :s-r�.�-,A •� - -�•! n ' goo on 0 nnnoo - one •7•_ _ !,.� - •- -_-:'G _ __ = ono' non 0-_ _- .•J::� r-- - - _ 00 01 lIl(�I{Sifiv Mi?%ill noonnon .�.`• ,'',• _� —� •—• _ _ nnnn, oon -- inonnnoon o nnn ono. �r� 1 _ _ _ nnnnnnn .•:�! ___ :. -___—_ _-,.=iJ%/��Q _.__ nnnnnnn -�'tj ra •.� _ _ nnnnno , nonoo on000r n� noo ,onoo nr non o nono on o or non o nnnrnoo o000 0 0 1 3. P m •l r• •S• „r, 7 � �i, ': {I�;;1<f;Ijl ?r,. ,' ^r' n .t•1fi �''i n U 'r o n^ nor 00 iW 00000 , i 000000000o c nnnnnnn q<' 1000000 000000,. 000000 00 anoo .1 - w_ 001I \<ii" NA � Is O C) W �k��llill '�.� iC5•. n'tl�"� •, : CT: c''t�u i5.'^.:) � u•�; 5;'7, Ji: �:) t nn000c on n" nn L35 .er Vs AC :-4 (zA. s-") I /* I gw) �jv 2.4 zi msr 4�m 15,4. "Co 7k,--j SECT I ON Cr fft - swc I. C�A 5i7- IRG32 - VC—S T Cr L SV A T i a n PLIrUJILC cr P"A �AAFO lov. e. ?fly N 0AX.H. ir L i- V A.T 1.2 11 RA I L ELEVATIOM �AV � F m-AF . 8 U T R C-LS-VATIUM �. ?01 O O 2 . ow',y i!t�, DATE JOe TTTL[ CONT[NTO / CONUXTANT[ — F81th Covenant Ctvch 10221 8E Carr Road Landscape Ptan PAMM West t ton PR81- Bob Bennett (206) 228-6221' V. EDLUNID ASSOCIATES, INC. u.o.wn •.c,.i�et, • oo■nMo+oM . oa.•u.Tun, CU-051-88 APPLICANT Faith Covenant Church, PRINCIPAL ACCESS EXISTING ZONING R-1 South Carr Road EXISTING USE Church Comnlex TOTAL AREA 1.0.86 Acres PROPOSED USE Church Comnlex Fxnansion COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family ------------ COMMENTS LOCATED AT 1111 SOUTH CARR ROAD. 41 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DIVISION Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Building Official STORM WATER LMLITiY t January 3, 1989 R E C E 1 V E P F F B Z. 1989 R i cl and u Swanson on 12th St Suite L Tacoma, WA. 98424 ` SUBJECT: SECOND PLAN REVIEW FOR FAITH COVENANT CHURCH, RENTON WA. Dear Mr. Swanson: The following items found in our plan review must be corrected and approved before a permit may be issued: 1. Storm Water Division (235-2631) A. See comments on plans B. Submit site plan on 2211x34" drawing size with a scale of 1"=20'. C. Move construction sequence from drainage report to the site utilities plans. D. Show pipe diameter, slope and material for all conveyance pipes along with rim and invert elevations of all CB/MHs. E. The retention pond needs to be sized and clearly indicated on the plans. F. Show the attached detail on the next revisions of these plans (detail on plans) G. Indicate drainage for parking lot area (new CBs are needed). Route all drainage into system including existing portions. H. A baffled oil/water separator (showing detail) is required per City of Renton standards. I. Show drainage system (per red lines) on TESCP. J. change drainage report as noted. 2. Planning Division (235-2550) A. A decision of the Hearing Examiner is pending on the required Conditional Use Permit. B. Provide plan for rerouting the on -site stream to the approval of the Public Works Department and Department of Fisheries. The Department of Fisheries has granted the relocation. Provide landscaping plan with water tolerant type vegetation, i.e.: willows, as required by the Department of Fisheries. Provide plan to illustrate this requirement. Conditions of Fisheries need to be complied with. C. Provide a $2,000.00 bond for street clean up. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 N jRTHWEST EVANGELICAL INC. )VA=�AC5V4 121h S T IIEE T [ AS T • T ACOMA, WASHING TON. 98424 0 (206) 922-1001 • JAMLS J KlIII - MARK(IING • • RICNARU M SWANSON • A110fI►ECf • February 23, 1989 Mr. James C. Hanson Assistant Building Official Building Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, Washington 98055 FEB 24 3W 11, Subject: Second Plan Review for Faith Covenant Church, Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Hanson: The following is an item by item response to the second plan review: 1. A. So noted and incorporated on new sheets C-1R and C-2R. B. New utility site plan provided on 22" x 34" at 1" = 20=0" scale. See sheet C-1R. C. Added construction sequence to new sheet C-lR. D. So noted and incorporated on new sheet C-1R. E. So noted and incorporated on new sheet C-1R. F. Added details. See sheet C-2R. G. So noted and incorporated on new sheet C-1R. H. Added baffled oil/water separator with detail. See sheet C-lR and C-2R. I. Revised drainage system per storm water review. J. Accompanying are the revised drainage calculations. 2. A. Conditional use permit approved. B. Revised plans of rerouted (unnamed) tributary per Dept. of Fisheries. See sheet C-1R, L-1 and L-2. C. Street clean-up bond will be provided at time of issuance of permits. D. Added to bid documents the need to coordinate deliveries with traffic engineer. See attached. E. See revised landscape plan L-1. 3. A. Added typical handicapped access ramp detail to sheet A-1. B. Revised insulation to R-24 for 2 x 8 floor joists of mechanical roan. See sheet A-6. C. Revised section 4/A-6 to match calculations. D. Revised calculations to include R-value of soft woods as 1.25/inch. E. Revised calculations. F. See revised calculations. G. So noted. See revised calculations. H. HVAC equipment information requested is already located on sheet M-1 equipment schedule. I. Lighting power budget to follow as separate submission. Sincerely, k' Richard M. Swanson RMS/js Enclo. C4111,fe c--i C V ;41,1c.4`4 /C Z E 1 ' A-f K U k ; tt,-irlpeL ebi:, 1120 3 2 lell'j� / 5 141 ti f'l 7_96 I'1,3o wnxK /— 31—�3`1 01 FEB 2 4 I' V I Ll t-,4 el 1-0 V 7 0'7 SQ40.4d -;J� Al -to I 41— rA-V > e 4-7 deq�h,4,y- hik ek-lyl- i/e je7 14, c 4-o -ld Ae. k-l-, -l'-" or ez--" Id-1-4 I^, k-, Y" 74L -4 ------- Areot. Ae- C-e- 0 5 7, 5, 5 (-ve-v 706 b 40 FLTv -41z�X Ll -,!;v A Ic. -ee- A. �4 Wd P -A.W;lr 4 4:Ctv _p 14 ;IV -)7 '(:2 -0, all -T-0- :1717 1 2 0, '7 r - d, 2 cs/ Ea E-0:0: c7o' z-(r.9 /"l h.x ��I,�-fit. (iQ' ✓S r. Z�LU I -- Z.`1.�' L�o l T�z 5r 90 _ 7 .s ( o. -2 s) - l y 3 �r�ji4� Q I/T :. �/� C _ I4 4 3 (r , -70) go l-7(`9. o� Y F_ A O PHI u - i �� ❑ ►u, o a -3 � =: C�, 9 (r, } U, ry ��� - , l c i ,;�``c--P-"r 5/. M H- I 2. ak- z--2, 0, c.{_. s o K $Iq G LGv' l4J D•dG' 01 ✓ A"I—C— �� c.�.• f-v� c. -G�r'0 S �4� J�P '����/may 7r3 e�-�,Q, G �r� �. t v,., G � �d � �44 /�r � �..t r11i�+.-1, �-�, � �t7.c. yiC't.►-� %�� t `{ �`Y.�.,.�, .c� c � j� � /I �cc- il�:� dot .�m.tic �.0 50 4-0 -� J � � wy„�, i �i(- : I., r'I �"O� QR !�i-�LGe lih*t"7 Qom- i�' r c-•..-y� l�ls-Y, `�'t"Yu-t� Y • � `w��y'[.p.� �1ia.y, 5 G�C4 h►�-,�..�i�� TJ''^.c-�/r. Ty'.�-y"� �L� T� a•�//P�" �j� �' t'1-' 1 t !!GV"� t.✓` r �/Y' vD _ f G�.r1 ��Y s4. r y �J / H+ ''s.. ,rj 6-v�-� �,v -��i�+ c-•.� � � a l � D lO C �. ►�' r l ` �..7W ��J � ✓'�i /J �i+t,�.-t 1 � rih. e G!C /��-r+, L•-� -� l� � .t� rw �..� �t3a� �,�.,f �_ i► �.G+n-J t v G� ti U `t.+� f{ r ,�.�1�{ t�' /41 r60 ' J a 1 I / '(cW e 6'1 (1 f.� 7 r-04 1 1) x 1,7o 5e;,,,c_j D(L-,-,, hJ n y�o 5 ve-�u �, 2- 5 e 1 I 02, 0 ,' t (,tvit..v r..- � I..0 �!v r �� v p f ;,c, fry -r .- (7 i `tt 2 ca5L)�t', 0, "� TABLE 1 RUNOFF FACTORS FOR STORM SEWERS FLAT 0-5% UNDEVELOPED LAND Wood $ Forest . . . . . . . . . . 0.05 Sparse Trees & Ground Cover . . . . 0.10 Light Grass to Bare Ground . . . . 0.15 DEVELOPED AREA Pavement & Roofs . . . . . . . . . . . 0.90 Gravel Roads & Parking Lots . . . . . . 0.7S City Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.85 Apartment Dwelling Areas . . . . . . . 0.80 Industrial Areas (Heavy) . . . . . . . 0.70 Industrial Areas (Light) . . . . . . . 0.60 Earth Shoulder . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50 Playground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.25 Lawns, Meadows & Pastures . . . . . . 0.20 Parks & Cemetery . . . . . . . . . . . 0.1S SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre) ROLLING >5° % 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.90 0.80 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.70 0.50 0.30 0.25 0.20 1.0-1.5 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.30 1.5-3.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.35 3.0-3.5 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.40 3.5-4.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.4S 4.0-6.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50 6.0-9.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.60 9.0-15.0 DU/GA . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . 0.70 5/79 18 ■1r1111111WAMMININF/MIN/AMIRIP■ NINE SOON DRAINAGE - DITCHES - COMvION SECTIONS D-1 SEGMENTAL w 1: it D-IA TRIANGULAR unequal side slopes 4 /2"1 H D- I B BITUMINOUS GUTTER w 5 _2"55od (min.) 4"1000m (min.) SODDED GUTTER �9"5tones (min.) s,a;; •..o.. ,3"gravel bed.(min.) COBBLED GUTTER F. Base required some as for concrete pavement. CONCRETE GUTTER TABLE A- PROPERTI D-IC CURBED CROWNED STREET112 e w 5e ote ,T `0 H ties �s �4 B D-2- D-3- D-4. D-5 TRAPEZOIDAL w 0-1 D-61 D-1, 0-8, D-9, 0-10, 0-I1 0- ISOSCELES TRIANGULAR o- D-9, D-10 and D-11-Airport ditches D- CHART 7 C s�oc LOPGS �./d2:/ A-? _,,/ to P, /i2 : /' 2:1 3 : / _ /%:/ 2:/ 3:1 /%:/ B 2:1 C 3:/ iA A72 l B 2:l c 3:/ iA 2: / B 3:l 'A 2 : ll 8 3:/ �A 2 : / 8 3:l 9 7:/ /0 7: / // 7-1/ _OF DITCHE F RAULICS B N I W 1 d 1 P R I Rn _ - 6!i 6" 5 ± 5-0` LB4. 1.75 5.16 7. /4 0.356 0.245 0.5021 0.39 2 0_377 0.297 7' 0` 7'0" 1.64 7. 08 0.232 0.162 _- - 4.5" l0'0" 1 68 /0.38 2'-0' /' 0' 5= 0' 3.50 5.61 0.624 0.616 0. "0 0. 726 2 = 0" /'- 0' 6' 0" 4.00 6.47 3'0' /'0' 8=0" _5.- 7.86 8.32 d.4/ 0.60/ 0.937 0.712 0.958 l=6' 7'6" 3' 0' /' 6" 9= D" 9.00 11.25 12.00 9. 7/ 0.927 0.95/ 0.933 3' D` /' 6" 12' 0" 12.49 0. 901 3=0` 2'0' 9'0" 10.21 1 75 3'0' 2'0' l 1' 0" 14.00 11. 9'4 15.65 1.173 1.1501.097 1.112 3=0' 2'0` 15=0" 18.00 4' 0' 3'0' 13' 0" 25.50 14.B2 1,721 1.436 4'-0' 3'0" /6'0" 30.00 17.42 /.722 1.43 4'0" 3'0 22' 0 39.00 22.97 1.6_98 0.447 1.423 0.584 - /' 0- 40" 2.00 4.47 - 1' D" 3.00 6.32 0.475 0.609 _6-0` 8'0" d.00 8.94 0.895 0.929 - 2-'0" 12'0' 12.00 12.65 0.949 6.965 - 3' 0" 12-0" 18.00 13.42 1.341 1. 216 /8'0" 27.00 /6.97 1.423 1.265 - l 0" 14! 0" 7.00 14.14 0.495 0.626 28'0" ._3 0_ 28.28 0.990 0.993 - 3' 0" 42=0` 63.00 42.43 1.485 1.302 Seelye Vol- . 1 'Srd Add. 31 i is /000 900 e00 .000/ T00 600 .0002 s00 .0003 400 U .0004 .000/ soos J00 A006 /YO Sow OOO.Z O .001 /09 O .0003 200 96 .0004 002 .0005 94 .0006 79 Q .003 .0009. 7? .004 .00/ N 66 lM .005 O 100 60 q .006 90 y S4 V 009 OOZ h e0 49 h .0 / 3 70 V 4Y .0 V 60 O 36 OZ 06 �l ' s0 33 0-30 009 41 40 Q � 27 4 .0/0 O v s JO 24 .08 0 �. 2/ ./0 .030 O?0 W .040 K OSO IS j .060 .090 Q �12 ./00 /0 /0 9 ; 7 j 8 6 5 6 4 3 NOMOGRAPH FOR COMPUTING REQUIRED SIZE OF CIRCUL A R DRA IN FLOWING FULL FOR r7=0.012. OR n=0.024 CHART 2 Z. 0 R, 4.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 SOIL EROSIO14 POTENTI , HYDROLOGIC GROUP K FACTOR Alderwood moderate -severe C .20 Beausite moderate -very severe B .15 Bellingham slight C .24 Briscot slight C Buckley slight B/C Earlmont slight B/C Ed ewick slight B Everett moderate -severe A .10 Indianola moderate -severe A .24 Kitsap moderate -severe C .37 Klaus slight B .20 Neilton slight -moderate B .15 Newberg slight B Nooksack slight B Norma slight B/C .28 Orcas none D .05 Oridia slight C Ovall Severe C .28 Pilchuck moderate -severe A .10 Puget slight B/C .32 Puyallup slight B .28 Ra nar moderate -severe A .32 Renton slight B/C Salal slight B Sammamish none C Seattle none C Shalcar slight C .24 Si * slight B. Snohomish slight D .17 Sultan slight C .37 Tukwila slight D Woodinville slight C/D 45. PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: 3-Z 7- hY APPLICANT: JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WORK: T0: Comments Due Comments Due ENGINEERING DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU TRAFFIC ENG.DIVISION BUILDING CODE REVIEW UTILITIES ENG.DIVISION ZONING & PARKING OTHERS ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING EPARTMENT/DIVISION APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Signature of Dir #183 � � L or or Au zed Representative _DATE �7 �� PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: - 7 APPLICANT: R���1 (` D� ►; nJ A N� (` u r)12 CI-1 JOB ADDRESS: S C A P-2 2 Q NATURE OF WORK:y\ S 1 0 tij S TO: Comments Due Comments Due ENGINEERING DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU TRAFFIC ENG.DIVISION BUILDING CODE REVIEW UTILITIES ENG.DIVISION ZONING & PARKING GwERS sTDtiI -- 7 ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. n A REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Z)Poy_\� Y\e-:< L,,v� 5,1o Y— C�-,Y\ j ey-1 O, Signature of Direc #183 Y' or Au zed Representative DATETVb-7 Kind; CountV Surface Rater Management Division Department of Public Work 701 Dexter -Horton Building 710 Second Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344-2585 May 10, 1988 Ms. Arneta Henninger City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Annexation to the City of Renton - File No. D95447 Dear Ms. Henninger: The annexation to the City of Renton, per Ordinance No. 4142, included the stormwater retention/detention (R/D) facility at the Faith Covenant Church site. Since this facility is now located within the Renton City limits, King County will no longer be responsible for the maintenance or maintenance monitoring of this R/D facility. Enclosed are copies of recent pertinent file correspondence. Copies -of_ the plans and profiles can be obtained by calling the "Map Counter" at 1, the King County Administration Building (344-4048) and requesting the file by number (see above). If you have any questions or need further information regarding this facility, please contact Meredith Mamanakis or me at 255-2531. Sincerely, Je y Creek, Manager SWM Facilities Maintenance 155 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98056 JC:MM:de enclosures VIQ�a����J CITY OF RENTON El,gineering Dept. King counriv Department of Public Works Donald J. LaBelle, Director 900 Tang County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, «'ashington 98104 (206) 3. 4-251: September 30, 1987 Covenant Development Corporation 510i North Francisco Avenue Chicago; IL 60625 RE: Development of Faith Covenant Church (D95447) 10221 Southeast Carr Road, Renton, WA The annual maintenance check of the stormwater retention/detention (R/D) facil- ity located on the property owned or managed by you was made on August 28, 1987 by Sherie Simmons of the Department of Public Works. This maintenance check is authorized by King County Code, which states, in part, any R/D facility which was required as part•.of a multi -family or commercial (office building, school, industrial warehouse, church, etc.) development must be maintained by the pro- perty owner(s). Proper maintenance of the facilities is necessary to ensure they operate effectively to minimize uncontrolled stormwater runoff, erosion and pollution problems. Corrections must be made upon notification of facility defects found during the annual inspection. Based on this maintenance check, your drainage facility meets minimum County maintenance standards. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions or problems regarding the maintenance of your facil- ity, please contact Sherie Simmons at 255-2531 (or toll free 1-800-KC ROADS). Je�eek, Manager SWM Facilities Maintenance 155 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98056 JDC:SS:kw l ti Kinry County Departnient of Public Works Donald J. LaBelle, Uircc•tor• 9CA0 King Count- Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth ACc'n Ue Sra-,dc, Washington 95104 (206) 344-'_517. June 30, 1980 Covenant Development -Corporation 5101 North Francisco Avenue Chicago, IL 60625 RE: Development of Faith Covenant Church (095447) 10221 Southeast Carr Road, Renton, Washington King County passed Ordinance 5824 (effective January 24, 1982) defining the maintenance responsibility for surface water drainage facilities in unincor- porated King County. These facilities are known as retention/detention (R/D) facilities. R/D facilities are designed to control storm,jater runoff and include storage ponds, infiltration systems, and underground pipes and tanks. Proper main- tenance of the facilities is necessary to ensure they operate effectively to minimize uncontrolled stormwater, erosion, and pollution problems. Ordinance 5824 states any facility which is part of a multi -family or commercial deve- lopment must be maintained by the property.owner(s) being served by the faci- lity. The ordinance also authorized King County to annually check the drainage facilities to ensure they are maintained. A maintenance check of the R/D drainage facility was made on June 13, 1986 by Dave Hancock. Based on this check, the drainage facility meets minimum County standards. Enclosed is an invoice for $135 which is the annual fee authorized by Ordinance 5940 (effective April 25, 1982). This fee covers the County costs incurred during the annual check and all follow up checks. If you have any questions, please call Dave Hancock or Jerry.Creek at 255-2531. Sincerely Q� Jerry Creek, Manager SWM Facilities Maintenance 155 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98056 JDC:DRH:mw King Countv Executive Randy Revelle Department of Public Works Donald J. LaBelle, Director June 28, 1985 Covenant Development Corporation 5101 N. Francisco Avenue Chicago, IL .60625 RE: Development of Faith Covenant Church - D95447 10221 SE Carr,Road The annual maintenance check of the retention/detention (R/D) facility (or facilities), designed to control stormwater runoff from this property, was made on June 19, 1985 by the Department of Public Works as authorized by King County Ordinance 5824. This ordinance states that any facility which is part of a multi -family or commercial development must be maintained by the property o wner(s) and corrections be made upon notification of facility defects found during annual i nspect1 on... . Based on this maintenance check, each R/D facility checked meets minimum County maintenance standards. This R/D maintenance check is a check of the R/D facil- ity and a portion of the"collection and outlet conveyance drainage systems; therefore, it does not indicate the entire collection and outlet conveyance system meets our minimum maintenance standards. Because this check was for maintenance only, we did:not check the facility design and cannot be certain the facility is built or operates according to the original plan. Property owners are required to pay an annual fee of $135 per facility for periodic maintenance checks (Ordinance 5940). An invoice for each facility checked is enclosed. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions or problems, please contact Delite Koler at 255-2531. J DC/DK:dhf Enclosure Sincerely, Jerry Doi Creek, Manager S�71 Facilities Management 155 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98056 900 icing County Administration Building 500 Fourth .Avenue Seattle, %Vashington 98104 (2061 344-2517 ICING CClj,%r! DEP�R'1NT i1 OF prBL•IC �,:02CS Ji7RL(:CC i'J 1 ':� _'­IA-P-.G ''. i,�T DD- fiSION DEV WP%L TANT INSPECTION SECTION FINAL CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL, Name of Development FA I Y !-� �` i V F-K J A t . `, CAAU C, t R-CA / G ZO �; Reference punch list dated and modifications dated S:4 r' On cs3 - --? Z a final inspection was held by the undersigned and it was determined that the develop- ment has been completed and that all punch list deficiencies have been corrected.. ..A copy of this: form will.be sent to: Residential:. Platting Engineer, King County Dera_t-.ent of: ? iblic. "works, 344-3810 Commercial: Building Inspection, King County Building and Land Developrenti'. Division, 344-7930 Please contact the.above for further information relating to bond release or, record ing procedures. �s RO i) INVEYMRY: Public Private Surf. Type Cul Street Numb Length Length Width C&G A Totals OTI~.r.R Ll,=R / jj'ENTS : Barricades: Walkway Fences = Others: MONUMENTS: Number Required ICING i REPRE ATI'JES: ( r-�t I/r_s ctor V A Road Maintenance Representative REQUIR-F' TS: Retention/Detention Fee: Type of Facility Fee --Walkways: Length Widt-Ii/lam _ Cases set: Yes No DEVELOPER REPRESEVi TATIVE (S) : Bonds Required• / ( ) Mai- n- c I I A'. ( ) De e� -1= ( ) i 0 her I if White Copy.- Developrent Inspection Pink Copy - Road Maintenance Rep. Canary copy - Platting Engineer / BALD Goldenrod Copy - Developer H cc: Inspector . rev. 6/82 Facilities Management Road Index -:;- ,! G COUNTY OFPUBLIC' r.ORr„i SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION DEVELOPMENT INSPECTION SECTION FINAL CONSTRUCTION 'IN'S'PE'CTIO'N' -- NO APPROVAL Reference punch list dated �•� j""✓t ?=� i,"; On the date indicated.below inspections were conducted by the signatories and it was determined that the items listed remained to be corrected. If deficiencies are not corrected satisfactorily and.witnin agreed - upon schedules, the punch list may be subject to revision or the matter`cari be referred to the County Prosecutor for appropriate ac on SITE VISIT NUMBER On -Y, -- 7 -max' ._. the site was visited and the following deficiencies were noted: !`��.i'`��2'i%� Y2" ✓�'�C %L9�.'t%rf��"�r`.'` e t/%7I �f"::� •�:-.L/f,; J.� .t..i./' / r f It was agreed that corrections would be made by and a re -inspection would be requested by the developer or his rep- resentative by calling .r_ rF ,.71JT_ at -� :-; `_ :.;, f Inspector Phone No. KING COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES: DEVELOPER REPRESENTATIVE(S): Inspector ` Road Maintenance Representative NOTES: e White Copy - Developer Pink Copy - Road Maintenance Rep. Canary Copy - Inspector Goldenrod Copy - File rNA CAE F�lrf� CoJF.NA-Nr �c-ruR�-E� �o►�r��.Ex (pZz► 5 GAur2. gD w,N-rrk Pr-, ►IFEPTO WA- 96051 Ap ASH,hCll�l`� 1 y �fcis�ti`��' ���,,�� Z.iSSI O N AL E"� / f' '�v�rryvNy (e't4e.r.4 Pe,15�w,,'A lzl;�l / ire L�t tti v c:► �O aL 51f-. - 10C-4'ftd in l�r�s �o `�" + J ci ",4 11,E &vA JVk't „r:bL baste are 6, are s�'m -14. ,-llHAJc,( �o���apl�<< Ama p. Vo-�e-lr, �, .v Prdam ih.t,,Jly �vD� GOYfi�' GXfvlS, � w�fGr'�7 �or�j O� Tim S� �'�-5 s� s (p;.-o aid 16 �. A->^ Gx� �`f, cl 1a" ft-r' t o / �L r f 1/d' � Ab-e- d►9 AIL, 1L aJ-� �rs -i� Safe S�-pey .r;re Vvt7�fivl..' ii wA;41 15 Were- 4(e V}rDWp5e- GQGVG%ajOk"e-t, ( ,y pf4-s4")e-j . (3, Soy 15 ----- - — - -- --- - -- --- -.-- - - ��c. So�i 5 �n -i'{^� S�-C are 4P�yrGr.a,tiy frl�trwoo�t, 91�sw,G((.yl 4J � nQt., s Glv►'t�� ✓5oi �s C14✓S6.1 �r kr;, 5 M or & M p.. Wtrr V�vtMldH npDr G/m�Sal�dwi4M !�►� S4b la�e-r3 . Ct rLprrs.s "G-�wC �✓oti (L -fvyj c St has /Nkrre-Gc l 4-•,�Fgvw OT p�gvk love, a1.riA �rayrsy ��OvUr.Un I� `D�t fps Vkoat- 2�t�+:4k, �3cjaw Ats -I- q, � dd b'1� 6 n r tti►O✓'Q . C9rSd l .�. is Q,.�. 44 WA,�C-V O-V'PUCA W i �'/7 frt�U K S h �S Soy L b im1cde-.X-4JC A5 S�Dwr The -D fo ,,X phrc Vhk� 7/12 so"k" ovi4b k- � c l"a is w�oaZ4 44 sr;�t `cE t,�Q, e �'►her �0�5 .r�-�^�Ll�; �o c" JU'4 tom+ A �. 4+4A d On o Ce rr Pt Or ; S i I 3/a ) C-r YVIAI" K%Ilr.,OL )1+46 aklolj �4 bM C, f� L o �f O �T 5 r 1 C D�Vef .V.. �. ��� ✓ Lh f mil r G �j (M oA r% w'1 4 4 t yul - - aft/�1y c0,`u a."s wt((-��1�4w oh �+aw 'f'fil6 of sic aHd Ovt 51+�- 5"r4-4y- wA4V 15 Gkvi-rc.j Th►'o � Tic Slfe , 1 5�✓'►•+� S y 5 �'�vr ��� 5��� �vvri -,� rse Sc7�. O•)CL J �t Gam, (,1 &�Y 1- �� w�,•�G►" l 5 `Gar✓' c.� Y�, M+ D� Gv`•r.�-yr1G.� G�OkM ��i�rJ a �vL�. w�G. l� �vOSS¢q Gt�e�-�'' Tti�6D�- �DamQ �/�•. r L kt o O � • f ��,,.'�" �pov'f "L.4h o� ��'� o�.�-rr,,, �-� ti4ti he � �o ! � � goo f �{ � fN.� #4 'k^n c-v-e-o•a.co% vo of cK� 'tip JI, Cr, ( cj J7" ,wj 40-y- hew A N-�"h �YmLL� ,� t l6.A Car✓ E 0,1S i ►Mti�Ocl �pw►e, I irk Ave..,, B i 2 Ar: (-e,= o, tao A Lum Ova (u..j -F(aw AV - 1ow�,, 37s 11 S" ate,, Too ` 5 = /� % T�, �. -��- �Q�►,��,,-��-�;E� T4 w row,►, t = o + '°o_ TG : / 0 -f- 3, D t 11, 7 = 2`1-.7 rA, h 94.tn�Q,-i=��, 5�y Z = �,gS�h„/J,r lvyetiYavn, �ra L�u��l2 F,,7-r tAfre,;,- A 4-a -bb F 1 nw Q C- I D • � � ( . 9 � C t7 . aGrc> W � + ! I G`�S Gov-v, ",,;wt 7 4e a D-4A 44,d 2-'%. Z �t 1,1+19 z(OISqI4)(o,oz)l/Z- bk �94, 3109. !1 i I 5/ D 1 J i I I d, �40 I , "10 Ph 4v L+ "t'i / f be (c,r.�a�f- < <x�efib � elIo circa w,ll et S�J wIA ;�e- pVcybjj J, 30 ,4c. r Zu' iM 340 5 M .'3,Z0/o VIr Cet qdz �,-:VAct, t 0 't- o �o � 3, ( o,i, �1,17)(l,"10AIL) 0;30 cfs c O,qi COO 103 _ Ot 3 0 _ = ��2g Sac /110 ol �) z�,a Cq�i zg.q ( o,��� �vnt '9 �linn� F kx j1Dy��L Vol , v<j � Z ear' Zq,9 qpT -F- - z " Us _ z� zo c�b�'vl _ 2`i. q ( o, zs) 66,g l 4' 9 -2� Ac- -f-�4 U5 A Cd n� ChA+�t fios �ow PQ V%a, 11 G r� 2 � S x 7- (z) r o of z' x rr t3a' x 7T o. 61 V =71*41 14 7r o, o f G - Arm Pf Pc 51zc �c�,f 4{LntS 2 5(,-r 44 r- 1 -GOY"L C f rl� 1 J .,r �A-Vtj `u%- � yr = '�- GG i / t d Js I l fi -tron� ►'�'�T�'� �-�-w� 1� ��w.r -�L,.c � G& t re,y7 -LDr v,,4.,4a4 .J. . Z,2 ck 5 ©r v= 6. ok !2D,L)z4') CW. j C-t�' o � rah �a7��,a-� . �a/7nc. �a_�Jc.A'y1 GMT �C �,�t'� a� '► hc. la's ��, b•w, �' M a� ��� pti� k, LZ �+f OJT wy kjd Gee. Tolm, av4, 7 (47s4t s w i t I �c kzA Al env' t wtj--t-.) -to Ike. �Oyav t"Ao t w �-, fti. �laP+ r aoyj . �1it-ti.,W v✓a w� r Lt4t d I'f' vo -�v-av�,�• lNC3yv�c�ey vc�J-�i � �i5v ZOO ►ti,��r �6y � 3 Z, Z.,e- I10u , t"o I/P =o,!� � 3 ej4y", Vol cam—(, d J/ (/ -? 4+� - 4 5, A U , Ye- TC, ' z 1 • I �►I� G --�-/ 0,157 z0 Cba 1 Z 13,1 _ /, Z 4; cfs 32- (0•3� Qo �, z13 `l5 = 2r 20 T - 6 o Qo i " = Z zo ( 5.3� - 6 0 (�. ZS, 5 3 T•r Zr 5. � fi ZS VT V5 x A e.1, c.3 x 32- = 2Z (e (S' W VI/ + V n - uo s� pal Kam/ � �T/'�'��''� > . � , w-•r ''-Z r.-s� p. wyti,� Wr . rr �� a�o'0 L{ ,9 ufd no I I ; .:, - . - I.. ZU' N; TABLE 1 RUNOFF FACTORS FOR STORM SEWERS FLAT 0-50 UNDEVELOPED LAND Wood & Forest . . . . . . . . . . 0.05 Sparse Trees & Ground Cover 0.10 Light Grass to Bare Ground . . . . . . 0.15 DEVELOPED AREA Pavement $ Roofs . . 0.90 Gravel Roads & Parking Lots 0.75 City Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.85 Apartment Dwelling Areas . . . . . . . 0.80 Industrial Areas (Heavy) . . . . . . . 0.70 Industrial Areas (Light) . . . . . ... 0.60 Earth Shoulder . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50 Playground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.25 Lawns, Meadows & Pastures . . . . . . . 0.20 Parks & Cemetery . . . . . . . . . . . 0.15 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre) ROLLING > 5 % 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.90 0.80 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.70 0.50 0.30 0.25 0.20 1.0-1.5 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.30 1.5-3.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.35 3.0-3.5 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.40 3.5-4.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.45 4 .0-6.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0. SO 6.0-9.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.60 9.0-15.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.70 18 5/79 IIIIIeI��►I■/���Ililllill 111111�� 111111�� DRAINAGE- �,TCHES-COMN,.,N SECTIONS D-1 SEGMENTAL w �? • H D-IA TRIANGULAR Unequal side slopes D-IB BITUMINOUS GUTTER w 5 /•/ D- I C CURBED CROWNED STREET -2",5od (min.) 4"/oam Amin.) SODDED GUTTER 3"gravel bed (min.) COBBLED GUTTER v Base required same as for concrete pavement. CONCRETE GUTTER TABLE A - PROPERTIES OF DITCH nimirwicinmc 11-c NO. 510( 9LOPCS D-1 - D-/A 12.1 4 2:1 D-18 12:1 4 2:i D-IC %2 fo 1-6 D-2A 11'1: P 8 2:/ C1 3:1 D-3A l k2 : l C U D-2, D-3, D-4, D- 5 TRAPEZOIDAL w e vo D-6, D-1, D- 8, D-9, D-10, D- I I y a D H o f D-' D- D- 3:/ 2 / 3:/ '%: / 2:/ 3:/ 2:/ 3:1 2:/ 3:/ 1:/ 3:/ 7: / ISOSCELES TRIANGULAR D-10 7:l D-9, D=10 and D-1/-Airport difches CHART 7 a N I w 1 a 1 P R I R6 6 %2 5-'0' 1.84 0.3556 0.501 _- - 6" 5 t 7:0" 710" 1.75 _5.16 7.14 0. 245 0.392 - 1.64 7. 08 0.232 0.377 - 4.5" /0' 0" 1.68 10.3(5 0.162 297 5.61 0. 624 _0. 0. 7.30 2'- 0" /'-0' 6-'O'l 4.00 6.47 0.616 0.726 1-0' •/.0` 8=0"'H00 8.32 0.60/0.712 3=0' l'6" 7=6"'88 8.4/ 0.937 0.958 3-0' l' 6" 9= 0" 9.00 9.71 0.927 0.951 l' 6` l2= 0" 1/.IS 12.00 11.49 0.90/ 0.933 _3=0' 3' 0' 2' 0' 9' 0" /0. 21 1.175 1.114 3" 0" 210' l l' 0- 14.00 11. 94 1.173 1.112 3 =0" 2'0' /5' 0" le.00 19.65 /. /50 /.097 4'-0' 3' 0' 13' 0" 25.50 14.82 1.721 1.436 4'-0' 3'0" 16-'0" 30.00 17.42 1.722 1.437 4-'0" - 3'0 /' 0' 22' 0 4' 0" 39.00 2.00 22.97 4.47 1.698 0.447 1.423 0.384 - l=0" 6' 0" 3.00 6.32 0.475 0.609 - 2=0" 810" 8.00 8.94 0.895 0.929 - 2-'0" /2-'0' 12.00 12.65 0.949 0.965 - 3' 0" 12'- 0' 18. 00 13.42 t.341 1.216 - 3' 0" 1810" 127.00 16.97 1.423 1.265 - 14!0" 7.00 /4.14 0.4950.626 J 28=0"' 28.00 26.26 0.9900.993 42' 0' 63.00 42.43 I.485 /.301 ocelye Vol. 1 3rd Add. 31 .. --••� �-,1 O��fi �, �, 15 Z. 0 10 4.0 m 6.0 7.0 8.0 3.0 /0.0 JO 0 40.0 REQUIRED SIZE OF CIRCULAR DRAIN .FLOWING FULL FOR n = 0.0/2 OR n = 0.024 CHART 2 WO, N SOIL EROSIO14 POTENTIAL, HYDROLOGIC GROUP K FACTOR Alderwood moderate -severe C .20 Beausite moderate-verysever. B .15 ! Bellingham sli ht C .24 Briscot slight C Buckley sli ht B/C Earlmont slight B/C Ed ewick -slight B , Everett moderate -severe A .10 Indianola moderate -severe A .24 Kitsa moderate -severe C .37 Klaus sli ht B .20 Neilton slight -moderate B .15 Newberg slight B , Nooksack slight B Norma sli ht B/C .28 Orcas none D .05 Oridia sli ht C Ovall Severe C .28 Pilchuck moderate -severe A .10 Puget slight B/C .32 Puyallup sli ht B .28 Ra nar moderate -severe A .32 Renton slight B/C Salal sli ht B Sammamish none C Seattle none C ---_ Shalcar sli ht C .24 .Si • slight B. Snohomish slight D .17 Sultan slight C .37 Tukwila --slight D Woodinville sli ht C/D 45. ii ii it F o i I LI o z z l S E �'Gr ►' o�� II ii ----_-- ------------------ I ---- ----------tve — t s Gv✓� c 11 Pow lei n Lei- Drc.,,.wvx � Ij —------------------ If Cub I"Lo41, �h.._ i I' II cf- 1 ---------- — ---- a av- i — �----cow s f•'� c o o o A ► a h o v-e . -- J-----a— I _ tIy wb SL14.✓yt i n din —o/J t/o of sld rr II Da r �t n-g GU1n f*•rvt G+C' d� .eir� l VI II q S4- CIR l I, 0 -iI i I - I: I !i I� ------ ---- ---------- .._._------------------ -------- ._....... ............ _..._..... ....................... ---_ ___--- --------- II . --- _.-..------- ---------------- ---._ li i li Ij --_--.-.-..--.-.._._._.._._-----------._.__.._.._.-._._._.._- II II ------_— li ---------?I----._.-.-..-.-._._._._._._.._.,_._..__._._..___.-..._._-._._..__._._._._--- I, i I I ii ----._._._...----u----------.._. _ _._.-..._.._._._..-.-..--------------- ----- -- ---- li II li (I PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: APPLICANT:..('_`. f _ JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WORK: TO: Comments Due Comments Due ENGINEERING DIVISION ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU TRAFFIC ENG.DIVISION BUILDING CODE REVIEW UTILITIES ENG.DIVISION ZONING & PARKING OTHERS _`-? ENERGY CODE %'� '� ; i /�� Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION �%O,�/V% ltlq�b� 072Z-11-k APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED k j `� �r�:. v✓''' S : ► Z E Ins i �-L, c� Sc �• ` or� - `o V � C ° ►'1 j � r �n �'i-i 0 ✓J -f eCJ v P'�" GF- 0 ►�tn 01 r (I/ r? � q �P ✓CP 1 "�c "Te /!q' (ro,0/' C(,Y)V.Q.y�yNt Q. / ro-i-ro -H &I � � r�J 5 z y � nd ►•cA�lo►hs, Sh o j,V i �C� ����(.iv'`� ����^ (l ;(� Ire / " •' h��� /•P✓!S /�7hs (�� �lav�s (1ve k" i / � � /�a✓ � � �� �✓'� ►rage. 1 ►. u �(f� ©'I/L� n�C% f(�a�'c,��)/ �SiI�,.i�v� ^I�l�/✓ f u 1 y l^d C 4 O 90-,i7 - r-7v7 -r -(r ^ �r..- e j.s • .� �,� (./1.,� (�V-G� r In n � ( i / s `i.f-�,+���,/- (; r��.. �' r� ) c:✓� ;j (__'. �( f/.7 S�--c. n.'\ , J Signature of Director or Authorized Represen #183 ve DATE f%- /t ff .,dORTNWEST EVANGELICA. ZONSULTANTS, INC. 5224 121h STfIff I EAST • TACOMA, WASHING TON. 904240 (206)922-1001 A =�A C • JAWS J KIITT • MARK[TING • • RICHARO M SWANSON • AIICNI/ECT • October 25, 1988 James C. Hanson Assistant Building Director City of Renton Building Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 STORM WAT ER UTIUT R�CVQ NOV r1198v SUBJECT: Faith Covenant Church 1111 South Carr Road Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Hanson: gym( OF REN70N p NOV 4 1988 I euiLn%Gorv111'+ The following is an item by item response to the plan review for Faith Covenant Church dated September 27, 1988. We have kept the same numbers/letters as in your letter to help minimize confusion. 1. Fire Department A. So noted. A letter of availability with the fire flow rate will be forthcoming from the Soos Creek Water District. B. We show the proposed location for a new fire hydrant on Sheet C-1 with a new 8" main extension. The City of Renton Fire Marshal provided an approved site plan of this location which we submitted to the Soos Creek Water District. They are in the process of determining the cost for preparation of the required construction documents, and upon receipt of this amount the church will authorize their preparation. Upon receipt of the construction documents a copy will be forwarded to the City of Renton. C. A fire alarm system already is shown on Sheets E-4 and E-5 with specif- ications on Sheet E-6. If this system is insufficient please advise so that it can be modified. D. So noted. See revised note on Elev. 4, Sheet A-2. We planned for this hood to be Class I when it is installed along with/ at the same time as any kitchen ranges. Hopefully we have planned for the needed space by installation of the needed 1-hr. shaft as shown on Cross Section C-C and providing space for make-up air equipment in the mechanical room. E. Agreed. 2. Storm Water Utility A. Calculations where submitted for detention and conveyance. Where are they deficient so that we can have the civil engineer who p epare thW make the needed revisions? rc,„o -fur abate 5ft - ale. Cnt,0n. Page 1. j Page 2. Faith Covenant Church 2. Storm Water Utility (cont.) B. Are these plans currently available for review? Do they contain any items which need attention for to issu g e �lding rmit? Please clarify. +kc per• �.cc on 1� �.�%+. .. 'ultel.-- -, )95 C. So noted. I will be in -touch so tkt a baffled oil/water separator can be incorporated into our design. O D. See revised Sheet C-2 for requested spot elevations on the existing parking area and finished flow lines on all paved areas. E. So noted. Is this required before approval of the plan or can it be submitted with the equired modifi ations after completion of the plan review? Ycs 1a_1or-c elpre-14 F. See revised Sheet C-2. Also see attached copy of application to Department of Fisheries. They are awaiting the decision of the Environmental Review of the SEPA Checklist before completing this application. Upon a site review of the project by Mr. Joe Robels of the Department of Fisheries he did not forsee any problems with our proposed realignment of the unnamed tributary. G. I saw a preliminary plan showing the proposed ditch alignment and grading changes along Carr Rd. Our only concern is that it did not seem to take into consideration the need to maintain the current outfall from our existing retention system - neither for the piped outfall nor for the emergency overflow. H. At the time we were preparing our plans the plans for the road drainage on 103rd. Place were not available as approved by the City of Renton. Since that time it seems the road drainage plans have been approved by the City of Renton since work has taken place. Is it now my understanding you wish us to revise our plans to incorporate the 103rd. P1. road drainage or only place them on our plan? Please clarify. Ye's 103 *a� oAjoiv,.7 �L, pfl1tr$ I. The Storm Drainage Report prepared by civil eNineer Jeffrey W. Winters noted on page 3/10 that the system downstream ... is deemed adequate to handle the increased volume of runoff due to the development of this parcel." What type of analysis do you require for the min. distance of 4 mile? Or would Mr. Winters know if I told him this was needed? Please clarify. 3. Design Engineering Division A. So noted. See item 2E above for similar question. 4. Traffic Engineering Division A. See Sheet C-1. Added note showing that a street light already is located on the power pole located immediately to the west of the entrance from Carr Road. Does this meet your requirement or does this light need to be replaced to meet City of Renton requirements? Please clarify. 5. Building Division A. Revised slab perimeter insulation details. See Sheets A-6 and A-7. B. So noted. Batt insulation to be supported by a wire system or other mechanical system as recommended by the insulation supplier. I - Page 3. Faith Covenant Church 5. Building Division (cont.) C. So noted. Batt insulation to be supported by a wire system or other mech- anical system as recommended by the insulation supplier while maintaining the required ventilation space between the insulation and roof sheathing. D. Calculations where submitted by the HVAC designer along with the plans and specifications. Where are these deficient so that we can have the proper information prepared for submittal? Please clarify. E. So noted. See separate rely sheet submitted by the structural engineer. F. Are the other non-structural corrections the rest of the items listed on the plan review letter or is there another attachment with the plans? Please clarify. 6. Planning Division A. Agreed B. Agreed C. Based on a seating capacity of 175 persons as calculated by dividing the available space of Multi -Purpose Room 50 by 15 squ. ft. per person we calculated the required parking as being 175/5 or 35 spaces as shown on Sheet A-0. Thank you for your time and assistance. Hopefully we are getting closer to providing a set of plans acceptable for issuance of a building permit. With the needed clarifications we will continue to revise/reply to each item. Sincerely, Richard M. Swanson JAMES R. ZACHR1SON September 23, 1988 Faith Covenant Church Renton, Washington Answers to Structural Plan Check Items: 1. Drawings stamped with Engineers Stamp. S. I t erns listed corrected and added to General Notes. 3. Mechanical equipt. weights shown on drawing. Sht. S-3. 4. Outriggers revised. Sht. S-3 & Cale. Shts. PC-1 & 2. 5. Lower eave and hip members recalculated. Cale. Sht. PC- . 6. Detail shown on drawing - Sht. 5--3. 7. Welds shown on drawings and details. 8. Bridge foundation detail shown. Sht. S-1 & Cale. Sht. PC-4. `J. Detail revised. Sht. S-1. 10. See revised calculation - Cale. Sht. PC,-4. II. Ret. wal l c:aics. and det' 1 revised - Cale. Sht. PC-4 & 5/S-1. 12. Detail shown on Architectural drawings. 13. Ply. sheathing shown on roof framing plan. Sht. S-3. 14. Shearwal i sell. and wall designation shown on Shts. S-2 & S-3. 15. Unblocked diaphragms notes for roof and floor framing. 16. Wall sections show roof and floor sheathing continuous to walls with either solid blocking or Trus-Joist blacking panels at walls. General notes and shearwall schedule call out typical nailing for roof and floor sheathing and shearwa11s. 17. Anchor bolts spacing designed using 1/2 double shear values for woad member twice plate thickness per U.B.C. Sec. 2510 (b) and Table -F. See ca 1 e. sheet 15. 18. Mech. room loading checked for seismic farces. C:alc. 5ht. PC-5. 14995 S.E. ANKAGGER ROAD • BORING, OREGON 97009 • 5031663.5793 12�EwToo i LUA i �l.A►J CNEck. lTewtS �parf� LG-r-rcV- -DhTcD ataG. 10, 19 �a� DIN JAMES R. MORISON Consulting Engineer 14995 SE Amisigger Rd. Boring, OR 97009 (503) 663-5793 J.R,� . ,EFT• , 1 �138 pc —I l� R. VUCyR�s�N Av �.z ', ft;i37Ett Mcecu. U"\t Loops . rea„1 MEc►s �wGs, _ (M.3) -�`' GZ%S � �QEv Fu.¢►�n cr✓ - l l u�T Wi , TF�WG) - APSE AQCA = 1, �l" � Z= �," /3,`(4 �-(,� - w-r, r/ S-� • : zso� A4 s�: < <�3 P5f .(t��er�.-r�•( uuv� ��izuel tJT 1 f?eT l.oaR (zuGtu ti -p�S l bir.� a 40 �FLoOQ- AnCfDU0,TE T5 GUTP02T MCCM , izan- L0AD"j6r , QU721(�(xE¢5 @� ov�c�i+{�►-�(,� — Poor- L.C,- 2SP5F -pc- pborIW& - 5,0 PL.I 10, ' — 2,0 � 7.0 ('gF gwn5�es - z . o JJJJJ (oc- to I VVAC5 LL _ I - q I k 1 40 00 N�' j p5F 23 1' 25 4 to = 3S P5r- ze, asaC►�� 3 1 IF1, /i(• Rio. C 7 Ou'(AC,. M = 4c�� - za 43b Fz ca) 4-xO(�z� 3 eEol>,_ e OS� I lSI i L .—Z�JD► -C_ / > SLIZ V = to,1 0) 71 Z i��� 3S n �S� �i2°l` '�SL t1 21xmLo1�S21'O = (n SZ► �9�pU Enro = jfn1�821 O • eww sod - a�7K) t►h�� •�-,-rl 4b5 e2 �111/ ob VCn-W - av�l d� ry I ' �i nn - •►w�W •iC�V? -7�'�g F►� Z ���Q - z'�12412 ' �Skiss\ 44 s51 * bill = q o L, �4,551 ,� lti o2 ova --:I�;- -fi ` on. tititi V6 �J -41, JA DMZ = W SQ, I -�V1 o�ti �I �titi av5 M - 9MIWO-4 -in9a -33mo? L al - �, „21 / z , 1.% £•aidja ,b � S\'� + CS►�4 - L►'�) S - FYI, � ,°� � 'ht►,�o ' �h�,no ' �4�,nv fir► r OV 0 ni goS -S Z�QZ �bb' o -nd Oct,:( �)oo/ =77 (' 1�-/abbo) �,d pig _ 02 fi �'A o2 -„am e-) ' ' rAPd . Wig-V.44"ri �q 0yyy5 �b="-rn YO 1'4.19 vco oob'1 IAS 13 185 i 1���4'r� ZI'•b 07 A-73a VA d5d Sol ='1.L. S = JCL -jsa cc Q) wtail LAJAut- t GFA►J LOAD1uG C32 i 13') - �M. Luamco NAvs simple Pam, LOA0106 19,Ey� 9.1 so'� + ►V LoPc Y5ME $(zU. ".)0 c.o�s<., - C-- �z„ 1�5 P51 ; - o• K, _Cx 4', Ce.) L , G o A 0 -q % S-f ? (fAAT r A Tla l?v l G whu.. 'R� �T6.. IIJcCL, P�2lr R1SG� : �24 Pe, F 5- �� // ,\ f��7• wp�� Rey 4 1"z I3 4- r3 .j �R�a,Q: Z(raw?.o*Z(n33)+ Iz" �,Co"I� 15V6. - �K• 11 C'WCr-Y- OF: r.' "k&Vk LAJ LL.. L../ g -V-STPWCT) Solt. - CQ!AIV, PWio VYcsS. 35 PcF QooF If, Wk-L Ul.- 300 yLF 1(1 . t 3M w- . yea ac J A,_- I,ct �3.75 = o.1S i '' 01C. w 204 ' Co. T. Vvt 2cs(sT, Maw. Vj D. LL- q L . - % 8 X 0 "7s = 51 Se 30o )K I.5 = 4So + �a WA — - 20 22 * 30 3g. �022 L 20�2 (o.s� 3 0 � ►.0 3,o�t I��a/ (APCIvr p- Z _ On oevp�f 1�2g5f VAf-x, V Nt uE 11-1 aJ 20)0 �Vc,ew, TW6, I 11C{2c���� 1✓tL-- , -t'b �`-O �(.0 1 Vs tic 8 y I T�1M Ca Mt�c�l , - Lnjt7�t (,oAvs - UPPerz- IMi r_N , 1?om'h4�u IPmr��' Gj►�s ISt� c�F i GAS FIPED 'F(.A'D t, Z;o") •PLLAs -pUCrjQG-- Fve- T-uVue& FuQl�pCC'� Z) - "jbTA� WT, :t IS004- Fao z« , secs r' s r 5(m 10 - -rA a cv- z , J �P _ � I c p L 3lxiSoo� V�YSuonr--v M971CN . MY&Y►, -bodQ - �4 0,3)(15mr- x (6 X 34� 1)(5;[qf aTttv1 1/4 '/L lk of: F7U1( 6 338� 114� l48 S a (t 150o') 3�5 -Epp UjtLt U' 10 MIu �. T-tiRts —41. t T� CvS FCC of —--pF�ot2c& (DSO > -fa 11J'fE4.�.uR.. WALL", _ �,G,l . anr• '"150/3 : ZG�o jGv i.., tj eirtc cr J stums BED G�. a'55 tic, _ EA. -StVc 'DF _1_ _._ .. -� - ,,�o / �'c. X 1 33 = 411- MAf , 396 < < (A14) Z�'qo)- -116v� ZSo M ■ R 3 S ,�To Q M DaA WA of Re-f)Dk-r AI-FI4 GOJFNA-N-r 61-f uRL�4 60�I (-EX (a221 5E- 6Agr2 1 D i �' ENS orJ WA JE��=rziV� w, wiNTr12 loc, PL �r- i,,��cy W. {vjN WASNiyc zzss/ONAI. STORM WATER UTILITY R E C E I V E NOV 1988 f3, x• k %� L�kveti �O+ G�C.ly� 5tIe jg /oG11,1�eJ iti - kW5, co,- J'ce,j4 3 e- 6tt"e. wtvj d v�,1.,,,` �. b4 6o, 4 re- , are s 4 o11�i1 r►, -f1 t,,-�'iaL1�ty( 'fD�c �►ra�lklc., AA ri,a.�0. V��B�T�M .� �JrC�t'OY►a/ih.c;,,.T�.a/ �jr S! Q t�irtid ! b <,�vyt A. 5 � h�X:� �� /�l,r �C�►-s� 10 / � �(. r i ve L�.s�.r� �cr�G oh I /s AA��� e . .t y� c-� 4 r s 44, S c f'e f -pe y 4r e- V►����itr�,,"�-,G wl� iGi� is W �$v'G 7% �CIv'a�®S�,i GQ,GVGio�Uh+cr,�-! Gj . Soy IS 'f'�c So�� s on i�, 5�-c cr.re gP�„Grw,�ly �r(�ierwoo� 9vav�G((yl Lj,L,,,� 7 f dates (Giv► 1T+ 5oi'S Gl4✓ssr�rc �,r;, 5 M or & M �GSe- Arm rooclGrfe-/7 we- (I S/o+�S lA4+ G. War V�✓tcN/oH Dr Go"501114; M N'� S4.b let e-r3 14 re -pre SGJ-Awx �✓'A (L -(vrj Met Serf hQ,s t- S14rf4ce 14-�Fe r O{ �q vk �OI�DwY1 A.r�/� ray, rs►"j kJvOwn S�> / (02b+r AbO" Zi + 1 '� N �G rC . G f O W Tij✓✓� b �4 ✓�- y l S�1 ' tj l� D �+✓ h g l i(L.l�.1/ E r /' c J -� r � 9r 5 o � l t�q '�ZM 0? P-v� iti a a 6 O w•o ✓ Ws►,`�'cv���cw.(aii i'T� �iraK-��, �+s Soy I �s H1o1q�a�'C S w e. (- 5A r+ hit Pfe-^71a.Q !d � P � P 2 AS g%ow,, o� -��oo ��phre Yrw� 7/12 GWIr� Z4 At, , E em s '" s�tc. vpw•e.,'4,rlicc. wQ,-{-e✓, ��,e,- �o�s C�,, �� ►.�.+ k�. � t�L,� 41X 0� o� Ct�. rr I<Gi, �''� 1 S o+ � V �' +'�L c 3 �0 C-r Yy' 44,1 m-,J- E I TG�L� 5 2 �'O t�.v 1 i� �Yeaf- Gcl �i►+i1 J OL �✓-t,t: t� Wt Grv� ` -dYl✓�, 5 l Wt.G a / A O Unj /,Ooy j 4 ie-s 4�rc rb►•- V ti� �.+� % � (-�. w+ S �¢' � � 9 � � �,��. � 7L 19 ✓'c 1 C.t� ed 1�►,� 'f-I�c, I -� 5�we- C��►-r IQ� �iyf 2.� , b CM/1r 12 Ar o ` T k D wl, c V►n {r , �� V"o�i -e h0".c. IpArk wih 4y1o1u-0 r'o A [, y-G IM�V�+ a �� e.a. !•a 1110 5 1'yGv��e % . 5 t`r�. 5 k.r%c.ti. ws�%T�v i 5 Ga l�v-r c.�i '��i►�o� � �hc. 5t fe , ' '�,¢, 5-f u►�' �y► S� 5 �"� cQ/ate 5 �t,.v� -�7/cr�^ / � � s Stfe. l.Qv15 t g�� � Gt a V'A.� �►-3[. OL���(�} e,,� � � Csk r� �� � cL ZL,►t C- M V° c�.,,( veAt L Z Z4 l 1 ("1 &1�� T `•" G►" It, CA'e✓•s d- Yh M, a �ODyv�. G'l� �vOS 1 1.v� k GV e- a r G VL o O� J�l'1w��•6yyp- - ! rv! i 1 �! a W N, 5 � 5 �c�� � ter, 5'�-c-sew► ,co �c�� �,r� �+..� c�-�..�'� � �%. tj I Garr D t re. i I:1Az� Ces=w5' A� t ,4 ask p �'2 Ae- Lam= 0,40 t Q ove,�, te..,Vd I - 37S '7 a S 7, 5 l Av- iowe.$- 375 - Z6� Il5�or-7ba� 5=A,04 vr ]JG�. _ / 0 -f- 3, D t- 11, -7 = 2-IA-,-7-IA-,-7N i h 94.►,nf.h��=GM �Iy = D,g7 iM/�,Ir �fi� �u7Eti✓ Jfb✓� tNol�+ Gtu�T�2.. Fe,r t,4fre,,,- 4-a -b A -,-A!!;, Ff.,, L f A D, 15 �-Vovv� "wY-t. 7 4.v. a D - 4 A �t+e.4 td otle- 2-"4s, A L�cl z '), I 2-)'/Z' (OiSS14)(L ok, o 4y A R 3 �s Y/7- D 2-(o, 5 (o. oL3) �z Q'' �b•L�Cc�� W�t� l � A�IC-Mk G , tJv�l 6yh tiv i � � V6.1� �1 (eft 6,0 41r» y►uk r.L' /incn3 (30 4 4-W L d 'GY b S l w� liYt �r•-r-C C.,h E. l C � pQ,A-m � "I:p "�� �Ti I Tom/` g�,ci �r►�d,.� �qR will lot S�ej wl�� � PVoybi D, 15-` — Z32 Cat Cam.( i� i . �A, i r T to t. -, O,' O (60) 7 �, ��► to y- s��, (1, (?)1 ,'7 AYe.A. G 0,199 COO a,zS" oA, ab3 <-- CSC b -710 M�t,c a r V 5 = 2 e; ° r- zq,q Qo T Ug _ 2 -Lo o, 2S) 6�.8 l �- `i -2, -FfT��Ac �i"�� �.Q v b I w►,�.c, V -r V5 Q. J AAJ4b �{ too VIA 3 `t' Z X TT 03 ^ 1 �' Hai 6o r� 8a x rr z� 5) — 56�3 q, 3 D,62.VZyk 0,62. ZF-Z2-) 5,0` 141* I/ 77' tT 0,`1 z,z� 3.$� P� Pc 5rz� C�.�c-u,���-n►.5 2 S� I Z 8g; yG y q�{•Or .- �} dip Aoac _ , m •�— — r 4 4+0 Js d ar l" CPS r�y`I�Cc,r ►�.ak�o�e r P�I0e — 2,2 c15 Ott v= b.2 �y ,t%a-f� �Ir'J1'►1 i�G�� i�''I.ul �>'tr l'Y1Gi.v►!tip'� �fi� ��1 / Z /�• � � � u��D'zi / J Nn�.v�Q� � 5a,ti,� �a t� (-�.r�., � N�+ ocrC - Sav�.�..�. L w�` Io�1 �'s � c�.y„ la,i,►., �' Ma.�' Rv�/ / /!�•►� �k. � � � pti�- k, j , '� !a-1y►4 f.'.� /4iM, j GGl74l 5++ � (T• rt" �*+-�aa �•-�c Ta �� A� w+.�e,..-ii1 �..�.., �,� �*i'r�+e✓ w i l l Yj c ft-X T La l ✓ e-� -f ` w -t-o Ike l�'P vw� oya+,5 epti ram+ ,.,,7 ti41rvl ,P?vrj,sC . -Fvl.ten Notice v'T-' -SY `irpL C .5o'` l Ira=-f /"-AzejJ A, � mat 3 L �( Z , 2 Ae it � L 31ggB '•+VILU7�ll�ty - - I/P d�+ bMFritv�t�.ttt, �ZD r�.�"/aG vD L'yvx -110 0 (� lie ti.Y 14Yrn V o ( c,,,,w,r, S�,, C�f�- V- ,� , a te,- l s. d��� , f Tc, = kp, H b-C mac, c [�, •, 1I,(z -f- 0.6CO. S) 7,5� � 13.1 (' -, Qo - QE/ /,2rd c{s ri 1-71 2- 57 + ri 1-7 qo �, zt3 V,5 - 2�Z0 T - 6� Qo r" z'3ZO) - 6za 53 V. _ g 6 �� x A x 3 Z = 2 -74 Z. ,/. 3 t �i LUI'� I �o C�.�, � v� n� O i.� f k.( / Z. t r L�> G%'1 ►� (��� � Gov r /J ie1/3 0,030 1 { 9 ►� - �.CQ 5 :fit�'�,.� . ,� ,1IY.tt. � , oy-� ,)6),;� r° - r 7-4 '�� G�V' �L� , �vr�-dv-� �t �'f'� ��-►-cQ.p a:i'�l� .(� 5-��'rs� vw -Ott ..I., Y , . t a a `' T . TABLE 1 RUNOFF FACTORS FOR STORM SEWERS FLAT ROLLING 0-S % >5 % UNDEVELOPED LAND Wood & Forest . . . . . . . . 0.05 0.10 Sparse Trees f Ground Cover 0.10 0.15 Light Grass to Bare Ground . . . . . . 0.15 0.20 DEVELOPED AREA Pavement & Roofs . . . 0.90 0.90 Gravel Roads & Parking Lots 0.75 0.80 City Business . . . . . . . . . . . 0.85 0.90 Apartment Dwelling Areas . . . . . . 1. 0.80 0.85 Industrial Areas (Heavy) . . . . . . . 0.70 0.80 Industrial Areas (Light) . . . . . . . 0.60 0.70 Earth Shoulder . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50 0.50 Playground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.25 0.30 Lawns, Meadows $ Pastures . . . . . . . 0.20 0.25 Parks Cemetery . . . . . . . . . . . 0.15 0.20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (Dwelling Unit/Gross Acre) 1.0-1.5 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.30 1.5-3.0 DU/GA ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.35 3.0-3.5 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.40 3.5-4.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.45 4.0-6.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . 0.50 6.0-9.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.60 9.0-15.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.70 i 18 5/79 IIII/I�I.�■%��IIIII►1111�� IIII/I%//�//�� I�111�111►,1�� Sol III DRAINAGE "ITCHES-COMMvN SECTIONS 0 An D-I SEGMENTAL w 12:1 D-IA TRIANGULAR Unequal side slopes a D- I B BITUMINOUS GUTTER c D-IC CURBED CROWNED STREET W Sib e ,T AlVaries B D-2, D-3, D-4, D-5 TRAPEZOIDAL w 5eee Cl T D-61 D-1, D- 8, D-9, D-10, D-11 ISOSCELES TRIANGULAR D-9, D=10 and D-//-Airport ditches CHART -2"sod (In in.) 4"/oam (min.) SODDED GUTTER o:.o. �9"stones <min.) 3"grove/ bed.(min.) COBBLED GUTTER Base required some as for concrete pavement. CONCRETE GUTTER TABLE A - PROPERTIES OF DITCH NO. s, 9 LO D-1 y D-/A /2.12A B 0 D-5A 7 11 2/ t' 0 % : / 2:/ 2:/ 3:1 2:/ 3:/ 2:/ 3:1 2:/ 3:/ 7:/ 7: I 7:/ ( B H I w 1 d P I R R'l 6 %z 5:0' 1.84 5.16 0.356 0.502 _ - 6' 1.75 7. I4 0.245 0.392 - 5 t _7-'0` 720" 1.64 7.08 0.232 0.377 - 4. 5" WO" 1.66 10.36 0.162 0. 2 91 Y - 0' 7T 5' 0` 3.50 5.6 / 0.624 0.730 2'- 0" /'-- 0' 60" 1 4.00 6. 47 0.616 0.726 2'- 0' /' 0' 8' 0" 5.00 6.32 0. 601 0.712 3=0` l=6' 7' 6" 7.66 6.41 0.937 0.938 3=0' /=6" 9' 0" 9.00 9. 7/ 10.927 0.951 3t 0' 1- 6" 12-'0" 11. 25 /2.00 12.49 0.901 0.933 3"0' 2'0' 9=0" 10.2/ 1.175 /.1/4 3=0" 2=0' 1/=0- 14.00 11.94 1.173 1.112 3.O' 2' 0' /5' 0" 18.00 15.65 1.150 /. 097 4' 0' 3'0' 13' 0' 25.50 1.c.82 1.721 1.436 4'- 0' 3' 0" 16 -' 0" 34. 00 17.42 /. 722 1.437 4'0" 3'0 22' 0 39.00 22.97 1.698 1.423 - I- o' 4' 0" 2.00 4.47 0.447 0.584 - l =0" 6' 0' 3.00 6.32 0.475 0.605 - 2-'0" 8'0" 6.00 8.94 0.895 0.929 - 2'0" /2-'0' 12.00 12.65 0.949 0.96� - 3' 0" 12'-0' 18. 00 13.42 1.341 1.216 - 3=0" /8' 0" 127.00 18.97 1.423 1.266 - l' 0" /4' 0" 7.00 14.14 0.495 0.61,' - 2'0' 28'0" 18.00 z8.28 0.990 0.993 - 3' 0" 42' 0' 63.00 42.43 I /. 485 /.302 ocelye Vol. 1 Srd Add. 31 15 h LIC W C5 rk REQUIRED SIZE OF CIRCUL A R DRAIN FL OWING FULL FOR n = O.O/2 OR n = 0.024 CHART 2 2.0 J.0 4.0 so 6.0 7.0 8.0 90 /0.0 10.0 10.0 40.0 26 I SOIL EROSIO14 POTENTIA1, HYDROLOGIC GROUP K FACTOR Alderwood moderate -severe C .20 I Beausite moderate -very sever. B .15 Bellingham sli ht C .24 _Briscot slight C Buckley slight B/C �"-- Earlmont slight B/C Ed ewick slight B I , Everett moderate -severe A .10 Indianola moderate -severe A .24 Kitsap moderate -severe C .37 Klaus sli ht B .20 Neilton slight -moderate B .15 Newberg slight B , Nooksack slight B Norma slight B/C .28 Orcas none D .05 Oridia sli ht C Ovall Severe C .28 Pilchuck moderate -severe A .10 Puget -slight B/C .32 Puyallup slight B .28 Ra nar moderate -severe A .32 Renton slight B/C Salal sli ht B Sammamish none C Seattle none C , Shalcar sli ht C .24 Si slight B. .Snohomish -slight D .17 Sultan -slight C .37 Tukwila slight D Woodinville slight C/D n4 Q t' 45. PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE • / —/r3 APPLICANT: _ _ �,C�/ /-/J Lid tiJ / jOB ADDRESS: //// S C 1�2 /e-0 NATURE OF WORK: RJL. L 1 I� a'% TO: Comments Due Comments Due I I ENGINEERING DIVISION I I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I I TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I I BUILDING CODE REVIEW I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I I ZONING & PARKING _ @T;-ERS S- d = '" - Z U I I ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m, on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION �7O)12 H 0'% /L./7-Y I I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I�) NOT APPROVED e' l jC. c,r5rr-, r` <, 1 v l - �\ DATE Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION I I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I NOT APPROVED \, J_ \ IiA `mil i -i 1, t-� y� 1(•_ il� `:� Y•. CJ �J Y / �( •J L I l rJu 1.,� r. 5(i"`�� ►'� Signature of Director or Authorized sentative TE ' .. )ULSEY&F "M ENGINEERING AND PLANNING SERVICES Public Improvements • Land Development • M-amponation 1980 112TH AVENUE N.E./P.O. BOX C-97304 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98009-7730 (206)454-3250 TO WE ARE SENDING ❑ Shop drawings Attached Copy of letter ❑ Under separate cover v El MEMORANDUM - REMARKS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 8 JOB NO. — ATTENTION: RE: OGt11an THESE ARE TRANSMITTED For your info -file As requested ❑ For review and comment DESCRIPTION NXI ')PIES: i IOa'Trl Av6 SE ' / I Y JN(A KOu51N1� � SiTE 1 WLVE(L-T STORM WATER UPLI17■ E C E I V D MAR N 2 1888 50b $ASIN njooriORi ToTn L oPi?rm Cot rmllAmoo 'TO pomf) = 2.6 A &ASlN HgOROLDk%q "P COV@\tWr ckluWi 1rj- (-8(o IEV- b Mom Cow• mgP 3prm nis-02o2-I5 Sheet of WILSEY & HAM Engineering, Planning, Surveying Environmental Analysis, Landscape Design Project Subject Name 6C7,WwA Designed by JP Nl Date 10�6 �4S(, Ck. by Date -15 Sheet 3 of WILSEY & HAM Engineering, Planning, Surveying Environmental Analysis, Landscape Design Project Name (J"'f Project No. 3-27 i5 -OZU Z- IS Subject S i )rry� P by, 4- — Rf u :l G` N►^,A Designed by �. Date —,I ,I Ck. by Date C. Sheet 4- of b WILSEY & HAM Project Name COS% UA(A Project No. ✓-271`5 -M)4-1 � t -�- yy SubjectC -�i17(r11 1('A — QOWIV 1 p6lno Engineering, Planning, Surveying �� b �6 Environmental Analysis, Landscape Design Designed by� Date Ck. by Date_ i Sheet of WILSEYHAM Project Name COV(Ma�{ l' ter � Project No. Subject �►Dl'VJt0� D�� Engineering, Planning, Surveying Environmental Analysis, Landscape Design Designed by (% Date S Ck. bye_ Date WILSEY & HAM Engineering, Planning, Surveying Environmental Analysis, Landscape Design Sheet (I'll of Project Name Col"W►A LkwLV Project No. 3 �21�7 "�ZO 2 Subject S�W OWIM Designed by Date Ck. by \fi> _ Date I Ohl)L� CHART 3-7 3Y' 2000 1000 800 600 500 400 300 200 N aL c� Z to W O iJ 100 z W /Z 0 0��0 80i Cr a o v N 60 cr W 5 0 1— w 40 Q 0 30 20 6 5 - - ,- MWi I .4 u Z SIODt Sp _+ /Rc7l1�J!/CC[� a W Z SUBMERGED OUTLET CULVERT FLOWING FULL . 5 J MW • M♦ ho—LSo - 120 For outlet crown not submerged. compute MW by .6 methods descriptd in the design procedure - 108 8 - 96 a Neo9 i _ 1.0 -84 -72 / 6 6 (�iy /W 60 Ey P�p`•E/bhp O �o crti W 2 / -54 - 48= 0-48 — — e� o.s I 42 ,y0� ' ti 4 � 6 - 3 0 g0� e 8 -27 s C N 10 - 'tr -24 =21 - 18 20 -15 -12 4 j _z BUREAU OF PUBLIC ROODS JAN. 1963 e MEAD FOR CONCRETE PIPE CULVERTS FLOWING FULL n = 0.012 CHART £. 33 fit: , .... .�.....o..�..�..���. KL:"i"1;PI'I If;•;jI),'II:"I10411 EV ri pJ 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM L5 YtAK Utt) ►bN 5 l urtr-t PEAK STORAGE MAXIMUM STQ AG (FT3/AC� PEAK STORAGE (MINUTES) AREA TYPE OF OUTLET MAXIMUM STC;�''' VOLUME (FT VA.C� - _ ORIFICE WITH HEAD TIME (MINUTES) T=-25+ 1162 VOLUME TIME vs _ 2T+2 T - 40 Q0T T=-25+ 2�0 YS = 3T+�5T _ RENTON T— SEATTLE .. CONSTANT FLOW 1175 Y s 2820 T_ 1 a 25 S T 3420 T _. ... _.... T=-25+� Qo 60 Q T T•25 0o T=_25+— _ 60 Q T+25 0', T=-25+ 1875 Q0 v s _ 3000 T _ 40 Q T T=-25+ 2Q94 Y s = 3510 T _ 40 ,oT ORIFICE WITH HEAD T+25 0 0 T+25 TACOMA - . _._ . 1250 VS = 3000 T 1463 Ys =. 35+0 T CONSTANT FLOW ORIFICE WITH HEAD T=-25+ �o - 2255 T=_25+�-�- _ 60 Q T T+25 0 T=_25+ 0 , T 25 60 Q0T 3607T _ 40 Q0T T=-25+ 2-6 s - 4T+25T _ 40 QfT NORTN T 25 BEND _._..._ ......_ CONSTANT FLOW ORIFICE WITH HEAD T=,25+ff]5:0�3 Q0 _ 4076 T--25+-. vs = 3607T - 60 Q0T i — T 25 T=,2s+-' 1304 Qo VS = 43+9 T _ 6r n0; T 25 Ivs VS 6522 T - - 40 Q0T 50133 T'-25+tl 8020 T - 40 Q0T SNOQUALMIt o + T 25 Q o + T 25 PASS s CONSTANT FLOW ORIFICE WITH HEAD 2718 T=-25+� -- - T- -T - 60 Q0T 3342 T=-25+�- 8020 T _ T - 6n ^c, [7 T=-25++25 fE6:03 VS 4164 T _ 40 QOT T=-25+ 3n15 vs V 4920 T _ 40 OrT Q0 T+25 Q0 T+25 SKYKOMISH - DVS V; _ CO\STAINT FLOW 1735 IT=-25y� �- 4164 T ( - 50 Q0T + 5 T 2D50 =-25+ Q0 ,4420 T - 60 Pf0T T+25 — 1 TABLE 1 RUNOFF FACTORS FOR STORM SEWERS FLAT ROLLING 0-5% >5° UNDEVELOPED LAND - Wood $ Forest 0.05 0.10 01.5 Sparse Trees Ground Cover . . . . . . O.10 0. Light Grass to Bare Ground . . . . . . 0.15 .20 DEVELOPED AREA Pavement $ Roofs . . . . . . . . . . . 0.90 0.75 0.90 0.80 Gravel Roads & Parking Lots 0.85 0.90 City Business . . . . . . . . . 0.80 0._85 Apartment Dwelling Areas Areas . . . . (Heavy) . . . . . . . . . 0.70� 0.80 Industrial Industrial Areas . (Light) . . . . . . . 0.60 0.70 Earth Shoulder . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50 0.25 O.SO 0.30 Playground . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.20 0.25 Lawns, M'eadows & Pastures . . . . . . . 0.15 0.20 Parks & Cemetery . . . . . . . . . SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (Dwelling Unit/Cross Acre) 1.0-1.5 DU/GA. . . . 0.30 0.35 I.S-3.0 DU/GA . . 0.40 3.0-3.5 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.45 3. 5-4.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50 4:0-6.0 DU/GA . 0.0 6.0-9.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0:70 9.0-15.0 DU/GA . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5/79 (' + Orr` . ��u � c � ':�a � , "^+�;rt y ' n, i 1 `` + df + 3 ' 4 r� � -4 � .Y ti 6 ,�r 1 l �� � ! t I f� ) Td,.t q A`'tt f t (tl V Ai 'T.K+ i 1 ��yt 'Y,.r 11 I t F � y .I A-. �JS� ! t i t a,. '�Ti � 9i 1 A'Ts -. i wfrc JS 1 � �u � � H t t 1. tl! � i,5 J4 ..{ i„ f... ,<, u cl T al !^ b1 r> A �•� •f i 't - �f 4 1 77 i� y_ rf 1 � � µ 9 1 7 l 4, .'y lEN�. l ! L l tl , .� + i vz � ? t {¢ y � ,`I.-a.� t I _ r. �{. �(�. 1J 1. r + { c ( _S.. _.... ......C. ..�., J...i d .�!7J...lr..a.._.....3�..--eee...ei"1.,1�1._.E...'l..r_.^;�.Jl�,,.�...?Z..��.. '�.���J. . 3�f4 E. ., �... it -_-._. �n.. ` ..,..1-.,.i..s,.��ti,t."'..7 J.. ��}yrr�s ..i.,... ,.^�F':{�i .1 T E R 0 F F I C E M E 0 TO: CKJ v����1 ��� DATE: FROM: SUBJECT;_..._ N T E R O F F I C E M l 0 TO: �onJ I �OnlCo� DATE : FROM: SUBJECT: (2eC�W/'c/t/ 1, v vrc d�.u^a,�.C�JnPi�t� �' �Ge C°v�7 S nr� : So J�"� '-T�a. � �" %2Q S e, ✓ � r 2 � r �. �lfc rcJlcam, - ,d _s lKo Y � /1� PLAN REVIE'},'S No. // 9 Project Name: <�D-1� v� .�,L, Zee 4-p� Building Permit Number: Date to Utility Billing: Business or Use: _ Site Address: Owner/Billing Address: Tax Lot Number(s) Square Footage Assessment DESCRIPTIONr ADDRESS DATE DATE - cxLcx's D^TE TO RECEIVED REVIEW BERGSTROM DUE DATE TO BUILDING DATE RCVD. DATE TO BUILDING DEPT. PLAN NO. PERMIT BILLING I 07 ,tea i i I l I i / TREE x i x X x i TREES \_ 125 xi ' I � i 11 k X to CULT. FIELD TREES �xCAR--_-��/ x x � x I x x\ x x II Ij X � x 11 4 2 —�-- x ___ h o I � r: N ry--Via,'-t_r; x 0 to 226 �( C ails �MKIL THE 9z) yx i� 11 I 1 I }r I X 342 / / 353 I �370 II 1398 I I i� I �412 [7 34 7 � � x I � ► i �i � � , I � ' � If x� ►I I i r k it n I El F-1 0 I rT I -- II \ x x ❑❑1 ORCH. I I I I k I 1 TREES 421 I c fillr r _ (� TREES x I I / x x I I x �► II x II X 371 I I _ O I I T REES •� f x ' 413 x \ 1�° vi XIS iI 1 i i •• � x— 1 �_ x I � � x r __ � � I 11 ❑ I X k u — x I iClQ 422 --�— \ -X-3 - - J x x I � x BOLi Lu 4 76 1ti x Ix xl 430 — C ❑ G� o I I x X x CD PC X O- �� _ _ _ _ ► I C1 p C x (x —�-- --- — ----------J f 427 jI 413 -----� ------ --- —_ -- II I I X4 If I \J� TREES Q I I BRUSH TREES BRUSH 4 i i I � — 0 40 �1 \ I \ BRUSH I I X 430 x 433 x P III \ \\ Illy- r x X \ X 487 '�— —x x 1 I i X -- — __ ,�11 I �r EXisr/1VG Di rCH /E Z¢8 2- ,-4BANDOA/ EX�STi�t/6 ConiSr,P 1%C 7- VE W 1 2- c A 7ENS �w� : 1II1407T "vat ,n,� $II�,M d i Ilr ■ (, Iw n1 L, I• 11 1, Q; 3! I f -- M �} MU . VICINITY MAP 260 2 SJ J2 I / / lc� FiNiSN �` / G�PADE G/P/1Oc 25-0--� 0 00 I.SC GlP,4D/NG S24-=I0N A A � _`5 R/NA3/I5DV\i � � �EX/ oS E7, � V ` Z3S � GRAO/NG SECT/OV ,6B 240 Z I Q� LSD \J I� 3� JI )C V �.I O-AoO ^� / t-00 (SRA O/NG SECT/ON C- C f.f 6' L AyA-R OF % BEOOin/(, .4 VfL 6' 0!/A.PI?y S,�O.4 L L S Staked and Entrenched Straw Bale Binding Wire or Twine I Ij Compacted Soil to ' I I Prevent Piping ,I � 1 Filtered Runoff I f Sediment Laden Runoff Y / I f 1 i 1AV 1 ll I J ir IJI---II+,!!�� � !--_=! 11 �►1____!I I ��� .-�A`-._.LSt�I II) Y;�'.�' �b ��i,l ii.=��lii•1 I I �._,� �-��ii:1;�-� i�il�i`+�s" CONSTRUCTION OF A STRAW 3ALE BARRIER Points A should be higher than point B PROPER PLACEMENT OF STRAW BALE BARRIER IN DRAINAGE WAY s TRA1n/ 84z-5 5ARRI E-A Z>ErAll- /V _r, .S - STAP ES OR WIRE RINGS ^2 .2 .14 GA. WELDED WIRE (TYPI, AL) FABRIC OR EQUAL FILTF't FABRIC MATERIAL MIRA( 100 X OR EOUAL 2"II 4' DOUG. FIR AT 4' O.C. L �1b'�.. .d^ � �• I 1 � • -,ice .\' m `e� I � =•: :• - I , -'• :'•'ems^"=�; I • :►' � •: � � .�; � ,II�II`_— IITII�IIP�II � SI�GIIi�I 11 .� ii�d 1ffIdI11i1>riY� li V i ELEVATION 6�x6• TRFNCH FILTER FABRIC MA 2'12".14GA. W W F 1'- I ✓2" WASHFD P OR PEA GRAVEL. 6" 1 6" TRENCH 2 EXCESS OVEHLAN - IV TYPICAL CR^,SS SECTION % 1 NOTES I. PLACE C OF 3/4"-1-1&' WASHED ROCK OR PEA GRAVEL ON BOTH SIDES OF FENCE TO CREATE A BEVEL SHAPE. 2, FABRIC SHALL COVER BOTTOM OF 6" it 6" TRENCH AND EXTEND BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THE GRAVEL IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN AN EXCESS OVERLAP OF 2" MINIMUM AS SHOWN IN TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION. — 2'114" DOUG FIP OR EQUAL TE'�►�'P OR,4 R Y .S/L -7" f�NCE TEMPORARY EI�OSION/SEDI"_;T�IrATION CONTROL NCI 1. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR O STARTING ON -SITE CONSTRUCTION. 2. WHERE POSSIBLE, MAINTAIN NI.TURAL VEGETATION FOR SILT CONTROL. 3. ALL ROADWAY CU S AND FILLS SHALL BE SLOPED AND DRAINED TO DIRECT' ALL SURFACE FLOWS 'IC) THE S IL'TA'TIO% CON'`I'ROL FACILITIES. 4. ALL TEMPORARY SILTATION STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFAC'IIORY CONDITION UNTIL ( 'LEARING/CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND GRASS PRCqECTIVE COVER IS P.EESTABLISHED. 5. RETURN ALL SILTATION CONTROL AREAS TO ORIGINAL GROUPID CONDITIONS AFTER ALL P/W IMPROVE2,EV,1 S ARE COMPLETE. 6. VEGETATION SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON AREAS DISTURBED OR ON AREAS OF CONS`1'RUCTION AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE EROSION. A) STOCKPILES ARE TO BE LOCATED IN SAFE AREAS AND ADEQUATELY PROTECTED BY TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING. HYDROSEED IS REQUIRED IN ALL PLACES WHERE ACCESSIBLE. B) AREAS ARE TO BE ROUGH GRADED WITH FINISH GRADING TO FOLLOW NEAR PROJECT COMPLETION AND TO BE SEEDED WITH ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYBRID RYEGRASS. THIS ALSO INCLUDES PERIM= DIKE AND SEDIMENT BASIN EMBANKMENT. C) IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINISH GRADING, PERMANENT VEGETATION (CONSISTING OF RAPID, PERSISTENT AND LEGUME) WILL BE APPLIED (MINIMUM 120 LBS. PER ACRE.) THIS INCLUDES: I. 20% ANNUAL, PERENNIAL OR HYBRID RYEGRASS II. 40% CPF,EPING RED FESCUE III. 40% WHITE CLOVER 7. AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS DICTATE, EROSION CONTROLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED OR ALTERED AS REQUIRED BY `1HE CITY ENGINEER TO INSURE CONTINUING EROSION CONTROL. 8. DISTURBED AREAS LEFT FOR 30 DAYS OR MORE SHALL BE SEEDED WITH A MIX AND BY A METHOD APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTA'ENrI' AND MAINTAINED UNTIL SEED GMMINATION IS ASSURED. 9. THE PUBLIC R/W SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN. TRACKING OF MUD AND DEBRIS FROM `11iE SITE SHALL NOT BE IJ-L )WED. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS CONDITION WILL, P.ESULT IN A WORK STOPPAGE ON THIS SITE. 10. ABANIX)NED CU',VFPTS SHALL, BE BACKFILLED WITH CLASS C EXPANSIVE CONCRE<I'E PRIOR TO BURIAL. GRADING SP> ICIFICATiONS 1. I '~ SITE SOILS ARE 7_,ENT2A:_ ,Y CONSIDERED MOISIruRE SENS 71VF. AND AS SUCH ARE SUS='IBI,E M DIS i r ANCE BY CONSTRUCTION EQUI PMEN i , PAP,TICULARLY DURING PERIODS OF 1,&-r WEATHER. THE GRADING CONTPJICTOR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS TO LIMIT SURFACE DISTURBANCE AND PROTECT THE SITE. GRADING AREA FROM EXCESSIVE RUNOFF EROSION. 2. AREAS Tn RECEIVE FILL SIUILI, BE CLEAREI) OF ALL VFrT`f71TION AND DEL =, IOUS MAI'I'ER . 3. ARFA.S 'Tc) P.FC'FTVF FILL SHALT, BE PROOF -ROLLED. ALL LOOSE OR SOI I' AREAS SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH STRUCTURAL FILL. 4. ALL FILL MA`IR.RL7IIS USED SHALL BE FREE OF VF:GFTATION AND i:LFTEI?IOCJS MATTER AND SHALL NOT CONTAIN ROCKS GREATER THAN SIX INCITES IN DIAMETER. 5. STRUCTURAL FILLS S:1ALL BE PLACED IN FICfiT- TO TEN -INCH THICK LOOS HORIZONTAL LIFTS AND SPREAD UNIFORMLY. 6. AFTER F11CH LIFT HAS BEEN PLACED AND SPREAD F;Wf ,Y, IT SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY DETEi;4%1INED INACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-1557-70 (MODIFIED PROCTOR). 7. THE !"URFACE OF ALL SLOPES SHALL BE COMPACTED. TI-IIS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY OVER -BUILDING THE SLOPE, THEN CUTTING BACK TO FINAL GRADES, OR BY RUNNING THE COMPACTOR OVER THE SLOPE AS EACH FILL LEFT IS BEING PLACED. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE COMPACTED BY THE ENID OF EACH WORK DAY. 8. FIELD DENSITY TESTS WILL BE MADE BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEERING FIRM.. DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT OR JUST BELOW THE SURFACE AT THE FREQUENCY AND AT LOCATIONS DETERMINED By THE SOILS ENGINEERING FIRM. WHEN THE TESTS IPIDICATE THAT THE DENSITY OF ANY LAYER OF FILL OR PORTION THEREOF IS BELOW THE SPECIFIED DENSITY, THE PARTICULAR SECTION SHALT, BE REWORKED UNTIL THE REQUIRED DENSITY HAS BEEN OBTAINED. 9- PUBLIC STREETS ARE TO BE KEPT CLEAR OF DIRT AND DEBRIS DURING FILL, OPERATIONS. 10. FILL MATERIAI, SHALL NOT INCLUDE SILTY SOILS BUT SHALL BE FREE DRAINING SOILS SUITABLE AS CONSTRUCTION FILL WITH 10% OF THE SOIL PAR'I'Ta,ES PASSING A #200 SIEVE. 11. HAY BALES MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR ROCK CHECK DAMS IF MAINTAINED PROPERLY. 9 Nis MIMES t11� V Ik NTS ,? O C 1C C HEC'1< 0A M ��o✓Ecr /VO- 86-//9 SAzE T IVO . / o F- / NOTE. SEE PLANS, SHEETS 2 of 3 8 3 of 3 FOR 2"x 4'� WOOD POST' OR EQUAL DETAILED TYPE 8LOCATION OF EXISTING ► (10� SPACEING MAX) STRUCTURES 8 FEATURES 2"x 2% 14 GA. W.W.F FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI 140 , OR EQUAL) SECURED TO POST 4 R AS REQUIRED FOR SUPPORT BURY FAeR!C END w/ 'j \ rViIA,;HEu Rt�r.K �4 �Z •6 t,Irl \ \ ` ��\` N \ \ \ �``•• pr PEA C fiAVEL •i t 1 v \ A INSTALL 421%1, F' 4"^^ EXTEND T \ SILT FENCE SEE TYPICAL SILT jFENCE DETAIL \ \\� E D SIL � � \ `?ETQIL TN1S FENCE ACROSS I I INSTALL STRAW DALE \ \ \ \EXIST. DRAINAGE \ \ SHEET. �\BARRIER IN EXI'.':T DITCH \ \ CHANNEL END SILT FENCE o EXIST. CU! VEPTF 1,171 4!' AL. F li 7►,�.� ��qNv►' ALE. - ! UARR!i RS- INSTALL STRAW BALE BARRIERS 1 A r c ` � ��M M� '«: ,�'■w `'" � "� - r1 UP TREAM EN(? OF EXIST. CULVERT H a` N f W t t1L� F R T'; W h E N I fr, TA LL F O �� I' 1 I ,�, ;�r . /`'-�' "``. . `. � .;, � t r c T A 1 L'; T ►1 l S ^ 1, c' = T \\., 1 � � � � \ � e✓ `��\`� � r `...._` '.,'- -, ' ''i` .. ` �' .,. TEM1'*r'+pANr �;,iiAY►l --- I-_ /� _ __.1--•?r ;4 C N''iT RUCTIG"1 ENTRANCE C CHURL (StIeEE�roEotCaSTt��bte PAVEMENT. This Sht. NOTE: WRAP CATCH c]' �' \ ��..!' �� y''�i�- •-�. �BASIN � WITH GRATES FABRIC UNTIL CONSTRUCTION STIR M � RAW BALE `.- -�, � p - �1� 1 BARRIER % 1 �-� IS COMPLETED STRAW BALE BARRIER 325 ~ --- 300 LEGEND ---- EXIST. CULVERT ---�� SCALE 1 n : 1 00' NEW CULVERT O NEW PAVING NEW GRAVEL TEMPORARY EROSION / SEDIMEN"I"'ATION CONTROL PLAN EROSION CONTROL NOTES I. All limits of clearing and areas of vegetation preservation as prescribed on the plan shall Ce clearly flagged in the field and observed during construction. 2. All required sedimentation/erosion control facilities must be constructed and in operation prior to land clearing and/or other construction to insure that sediment laden water does not enter the natural drainage system. All erosion and sediment facilities shall be maintained in a satisfactory condition until such time that clearing and/or construction is completed and potential for on -site erosion has passed. The implen-entation, maintenance, replacem-ant and additions to erosion/ sedimentation control systems shall be the responsibility of the permittee. 3. The erosion and sedimentation control systems depicted on this drawing are intended to be minimum requirements to meet anticipated site conditions. As construction progresses and unexpected or seasonal conditions dictate, the per- mittee shall anticipate that more erosion and sedimentation control facilities will be necessary to insure complete siltation control on the proposed site. During the course of construction, it shall be the obligation and responsibility of the permittee to address any new conditions that may be created by his activities and to provide additional facilities, over and above minimum requirements, as may be needed to protect adjacent properties and water quality of the receiving drainage system. 4. Ap?roval of this plan is is for erosion/sedimentation control only. It does not constitute an approval of storm drainage design, size nor location of pipes, restrietors, channels or retention facilities. 5. In any area which has been stripped of vegetation and where no further worla is anticipated for a period of 30 days or more, all disturbed areas must be immediately stabilized with mulching, grass planting or other approved erosion control treatment applicable to the time of year in question. Grass seeding alone will be acceptable only during the months of April through September inclusive. Seeding may proceed, however, whenever it is in the interest of the permittee, but must be augmented with mulching, netting, or other treatment approved by King County Surface Water Management, outside the specified time period. 6. For all erosion/sedimentation control ponds where the dead storage depth exceeds 6 inches, a fence, a minimum of 3 feet high, is required. 7. A temporary gravel construction entrance, 30' x 50' x 8" of 4- to 6-inch quarry spalls shall be located at all points of vehicular ingress and egress to the construction site. STRAW BALE BARRIER DETAILS 1. Excavate the trench. ?, Pla,e and stake straw bales. /Staked and E-,trenched / Straw Bale .i Binding Wire �•:' or Twine 7%4 /r-, 4" -�_- _ Filtered ed Runoff Flo& /' f l width e y ;• •„ 3. Wedge loose straw between 4. Bac fill and compact the bales. excr.vated soil. CONSTRUCTIO'1 OF A sr.1AW SALE BARRIER Points A should be highz, than point r PROPER PLACEMENT OF STRAW BALE BARRIER IN DRAINAGE WAY Compacted Soil to Prevent Piping /Sediment Laden Runoff CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. INSTALL STRAW BALE BARRIERS 2. TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 3. SILT FENCE 01 ST&I 01!!l " d, I STORM WATER DRAINAGE NOTES 1. All construction shall be in accordance with King County specifications. 2. The storm drainage %astern ahallbe constructed according to the approved plans which are on file in the De;}artrneni of Public Works Central Records. Any deviatiw from the approved plans will require writte•i approval from the proper agenr_y, r urrently, the Kinr, Cormly Department of Public Works. 3. copy of these approved Mans must be on the job site whenever construction is in progress. 1.f�,gu•rr s��.rll •,� K.C. A.S. ,riles% otherwise approved by King County Department of s d"Ixptnent activity occurs, a pre -construction meeting `•••,arsnlent of Public Works Development Inspection t�c .'^9 'I I , -'r �,N• .. i., .. ,� r , IY j .., :! Y'r - '" �ji� ,,1, i W� I ��" `, �::'. �`/CE f �1' /I Y .t'• I `1i '�'OrI Qrt Crr,f ? r I •` rl 1 y •,. ` \,• \�� r; %ry � tl Ist. I I /Tnrr I ( i I ..r « � a ..R7• I �'�• � 7 I it �` ' � Ir i7 ! r� .. ' i t k.,r�" � 9 •A; . I'. rrerk 6, + i t ... 1 r. tllll;lt�tlllt�l I r�., $ r .Ulf•"riC�lt �-t51F► 1 •Rt171S tr, met before this pre -construction meeting 15 t0 ;'��. 'if r*+ldr ttr rittnal .w a c.••Ktulird c,,py of the liability policy required by King 1 I;'I�!1'. I(I� i �il I �� CIA•, �;;. ^li wi sY �4r ..•wl County Coca 24-"-I `1D) ttr the Departrnent of Public Workr Development + l_ �( a „ •; ^! 4' ! Inspection Sectrth4 ! j r a. I 7. All sedimentation/erosion' tecllitr-r s• �' r { ' S building •onstruction, and thsv5iiiiid&L,:w u# # ►:qw"f r %AW`NWt AMA, ..we+4tvta.r » t " v G, y ••• t - " tio•r is 4 wri ,leted and ih� •'Oteritia* r - n V Woc •h ��•fit L ul 'l `�T+ �:','f�'. Tr-010'Y� ' S A11 31 RE IN STALLED AND IN ' , `I' V � '!'i r s • r • , i u 1.�4' t • - IN CCINJUNCTION WITH ALL CONSTRUCTION •- � � "•'('"'n ' � t � •. to tit ft%") t %Ll %% rrls; A�.il�'ITY fXCEf.US THE CAPACITY' ANC' iNTCN'C J w Tit; Tn; /irV°%(TON EAii1Tl��N CONTROL FACILITIES OR UNLESS I'• f ' 1v'pttr. w �_ p -1 9I �r Y14.,�I4 lr. • t. t' _ Si'pr . sure M I } (aa �•n a�� ' R. ,.. i Y11i ICY 1'►a. %i f IIt U�`CD AY 1hE SUi2FACE WATEfl MANAGEMENT DIVISION. t••• I I .rt� �! ,•,'" �' �. w' •' ,r 9. All disttiroed areas shall toe seeded and mulched or otherwise stabilized to the \ "� `"1 .• r _!! J '� ' t r 1� 1 - ' satisfaction of the D!-partment of Public Works for the prevention of on -site i "'"'• j r "5' I-_-: - '`"'" 7.,. s ';,� crvsivn after tht• cornpL•tru'r of Construction. droseedin6 or as otherwise a st 10. Grass shall be establkhr-d 0 h y approved by King tl �` . • ..t,lr„ ,eon" - _ `f-� County Department of P,.iblic Torks. The performance band will not be released'10 I ( I ` \�\• ) a ji f I ,a untii the grass has been established, unless otherwise approved by the King County Department of Public works. 3632 11. All pipe and appurtenances shall be laid or, a properly prepared foundation in -i , accordance with Section 7-02.1(I) of the current State of aashington Standard r �; _ ,uua�/ `� ,,•� .1 Specificatio•is for Road and Bridge Construction. This shall include necessary leveling or the top of the foundation material as well as placement and compaction of required bedding material to unitorrn grade so that eveling of the trench bottou.�1 r(y J }• ,-.. ,,, „! �g a I , !n•� s the entire length of the pipe will be supported on a uniform) dense unyielding b P P PP y g. j J a --I- -' 1 r �, •.. ...,. base. If the native material in the bottom of the trench rnr-ts the requirements 7 _ _ ? T -� 'r+;'h !, L� +., ., _j j • r „��, for "Gravel Backfill for Pipe Bedding" the first lift of pipe bedding may be / = _ - �'�'-''�•�� r'�, \,Tatted provided the material in the bottom of the trench is loosened, regraded I t wn !r + :. _ Sr '^ ,�,tP ti, i, �.1_ -.. .-- I is • -1"1'� and compacted to form a dense unyielding base. ._ o . .: ... �._..-.. _....--_ir 'f S' ^. .L� r It 12. (_vnstruction of d_watering (groundwater) system snall be in accordance to the t - , K( �j" AP'a'A Standard Specification, Section 61-3.02. 13. G3rv1n17rd steel pipe utilized as detention facilities shall hive asphalt treatment VICINITY MAP01 or D? ttrr inside and outside. 14• Structur.•s shall not be permitted within 10 feet of the sprint line of any storm drai-vagF pif,eftiy, or 15 feet from the top of any channel bark. 15. All drain,tr- structures not on public. rights -of -way shall have solid locking lids ! unless rttir •aisc approved by the Department of Public storks. 16. All cat,-h basin grates shall be depressed 0.10 feet below pavement level. 17. Cate-h basin grates installed on Cow-ity right-of-way shall conform to standard drawing Vu. 39 or No. 44 which includes the stamping "Outtall to Stream, Dump No Polluta^ %" and "Property of King County." IS. Plans ahowinF all underground utilities must be provided to the Department of Public Zorks Development Inspectian Section. Plans for water and sanitary sewers must oe provided prior to the pre -construction meeting. Plans for all other utilities must oe provided prior to the installation of road base course materials and must show the location of the measures which will be taken to prevent soil-rosion and sedimentation, 19. 0;,en c.rt ro id crossings for utility trenches on existing traveled roadway shall be bac-efilled only with pea gravel or 5/8-inch minus crushed rock and mechanically cornpacted. Cuts into the existing asphalt shall be neat line cut with saw or jackha•rrrner in a continuous line. A temporary cold mix patch must be placed irnmedvilely after Backfill and compaction. A permanent hot mix patch shall be placed within 30 days and shall be the thickness of th- original asphalt or two inches, whichever is greater. 20. All metal driveway culverts within County right-of-way must have concrete or masonry headwalls of acceptable design. 21. Rock for erosion protection of roadside ditches, where required, shall be of sound quarry rock placed to a depth of 1 foot and must meet the following specifica- tions: rock size _ h" - 2", percent passing = 10% - 20%; rock size = 2" - 4", percent passing = 30% -40%; rock size = 4" - 8", percent passing = 40% - 70%. n PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTlO'f�! PRINTED FEB 12 19$8 WILSEY &HAM y, Q� t 00 • tZ C) (n w � Z1, . oL O!r LUCn oZ � W CL F' x sw LH Eza� O J CL �o Z� a M Z� W T 0 (a) Date OCT 198 Scale AS NOTE Designed JAM DrawnHP/GW R Checked J MB Approved - Dw . Number 3- 2710202-20- D SHEET 1-of--3- �/ /,- CONSTRUCT- `- T -/ 0 FF_ - w o I w 1, � a - �/� :� / �/-, �, o ,� 3 ,,ROCK L IN E DITCH FOR EROSION PROTECTION. SEE STORM WATER DRAINAGE NOTE No. .EXIST. GROUND 21 , SHEET No. 1 of 3. \� 0 \ � I / \ I cn\ \ � �1 \� 1� \� ) � I I/ ,E TYPICAL DRAINAGE SWALE1 ARR r.r-n•rPIN 1. I I SEE JCIr I I V IN 21" THICK BACKFILL 2' - 4" QUARRY '(- SPALLS l _ 24" V+"t: •n MINA k 4"PERFORATED ,_ ! j' WHERE WALL EXCEEDS HEIGHT of 6'-0", CONSTRUCTION MUST BE UNDER FULL TIME OBSERVATION OFA GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. \ CONSTRUCTS 2,60 LF + __ � DRAINAGE SWQ nn -. ,� 0. %min SLOP . SEES,TYPICAL SEE -t0N \ eZIS, SHEET. SCALE I" = CURB RETURN DATA PY.103 ' rd. STA. 18+09.4 , I8 LT. ELEV. 265.09 FL. ,, A = 85° l0' 18" A/4 ELEV. 263.5 FL. LI � R = 35.00' A/2 ELEV. 261.6 FL. ��' �f�' L =52.03 3/4pELEV. 259.9 FL. � ©R. CARR RG ELEV. 258.2 FL. zq� PC. 103rd STA 18+10.5,22'RT. ELEV. 264.90 FL. A= 85013'30" A/4 ELEV. 264.5 FL. GI R= 35.00: A/2 ELEV. 265.5 FL. L= 52-06 3/411 ELEV 267.7 FL. �, PC.R. CARR RD. ELEV. 269..0 FL. K_- A E. ��q LEGEND ./ ) K 22 PVMT. REMOVAL 51 � �0��\\ = GRAVEL ACCESS RD. is, .q �S/�� 0 NEW CONC. CURL/GUTTER [ TEMP ASPHALT CURB/ GUTTER \ 0 '/,_ 0000 ROCK RETAINING WALL GENERAL NOTES: A.) Install Type 72 Barricade - (2) 12'x 12"x 2" (3) 8'x 4' x 4" Posts Embedded in Conc. - 3' Deep. B.) Install Chain Link Gate - 6' High With 15' Opening ( Lockable) Centered in Grovel Access Rd. DRAIN PIPE WRAPPED ry y AA& __ 1, , . ,� I R - A 1.,, I '4 � L� ,,, - ` � \ N\ \ " _%.,,.,11 N` _ _ ----� I 0Im I,mI - , `_ -­, ,_ _N1 \. . WITH GEOTECH FABRIC, I �.� y '� \3 �, _` _- _ \\ N ,,N ;,(<--%-5 _,__ 4- ., � I,w-_ -�.. I I 11 "- 0w I _4I ! 0', 1'--_0, *0011101", 4� ­iil, , ",," BACKFILLED W/PEA GRAVEL. �� � `'�. +;, 25 -• ___ Tr=- - _._ `� A ROCK RETAIN I NG WALL DETAt L T SECTION n. ;, .,,,�- r .. h, ,, .. SCALE M M N O M IA L� .. - ..n�.,}��,, ,.:•..., ...:.., �,,,,, ,,, ,,, ,, i, „ , » i,,.,, :: �.,, :, r..............:.: , „ „» . :... ,,......:.....":... .,,:.. .. ,»,»•.».,»•... , ,..,... ,.,..».. •,»,..»,..•,... ,...:, »„»»...,•»,........ .,»,.».•.• ... o ¢y f µ.£..: .r.rs.wx..r. 9� f ( . ` . ,... .. Z.., f y�,y�. - t R I r ii} .-,ram''6 �A�:•. . . . , , , , , � • . . ff . . . . . . . . . . . i - . - . . . . . . . i i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . ! £ ! . I - .. I'll ­ I 11 . : � I : I 7 : ... ... . . ....... A;41io � .... I . I � -It'. I I ; I : I .� I � � � : � . . .30F4 , .; .. : : +:f:::: :::: : :::::: :: ::: ::: ::::: , N N+H ... ... t ........ ........ ........ ..... i �X Wto : 4 ii .. ... .... ........ - - . : __...._ . _........ ........ ........................................................................ . . . ........................................ -..». ............................................................................................................................ ..... HN W N a'� ...... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . y W nj 2 }-- I''d H N _ . . . . . . . . . . _�.._. ...... .. ...... ........ .... ..... _ ......... C� -. J N .. . . . . . . . . . . Q- cO Z :N O1. 200 �/.' C. ' 'r >- N _ _ t m > ctit._ F = X (D .W o ..... , . l oa v.c. ...... loo v c. ..... ... . . , , .:. > X . w ...... ......... ...... ,o. :W .. ... , .. _ ......... i ......... ..... ... .. .... . .. ... mw w..cv JwQCi :..: . - 4 p . a . . .. . . . . rn .J rn:ro > . + O:ni . . . 0 .... .... ...... .... >- : �- V 1�J M r Q a0 J W C� cp : Cps . 0� . _ .. _L- Q�............................ .. ......... _ ._.... 4 ........................ _ ..... ........... ..................... .. Q H _ } _ .. ... ... ....... _................. . �•- . . . : N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N _ ....� .... .. N N.. �, . : i ` .... : ` 270 ' : . O .m . , .... m Jw Q, �� .. O ......;..... :@� �w . V N M.0 �. N :�j ZU w uj - ....... .... W .. J . - - o� O . .. cn -- �? _ - r\2 1 !0 :. ....... . :....... O j . CO ao: - m ....... ... � .... .. .. 3' ... . . o lnh . . . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . . . W . . :� 0>0 . . . .. . .. . .. .... . . . N . . . .:� . . . . . . . . . . F d \ O o Q .... .. .p .... ... o . _� ...... :y 3 . . . . . ....1 I li r Ni lf7 m _�-- Q . . . . , -- _ ..... . .... ��Q n: - � _o :.......:..o .. ; ............... J.. ..,... is _ 60 • I co . . -.i. . . .:....... I...... � .. ......... ...... . 6 CID..... M 2 . a .... .. .. ... .. ..... d' (fl w :H W „N �: i IW % S M� I . . . . . . . . . . ' N w I ... '• ... to . c!D ....... + .. ...... . -J : � \`�, ' 4°/ . ... /�r Q cU `:G• C: M .: t I2 I . ,,� P� :::::: :: : : :: : : :: : . : : .. . .. . . . . M I. O - - p �� . , j - . . . . ...+ C .. . . . . . . ' + v w UI Oj .. .... . . .. - cp j _ H 12 . : : : : : :: : ::: : :: : O M Q :N . W d M - I �' r' E _ O . °0 . ap E,y' . , . to C7 + nj N - 0) ,p - Q o .. I .... 4 a : o: . . . 1 ..... ... a N ,�, o d _ d N a �.a� o , ..... .. �: ... , - STt�RM: b.RAiN: PROFsLE . . :� cv:: 2 . - 1- -. o ........ ....... ,- I-- ......... �. 41 .... I ... ........ I > I-- l- F" ' ' Q o cn cn N_ 1 . .... , . . cn. m ...0-. -- .... U: �� O. 4 Q I- -�- .... .: SCALE . .... i _ 4i lion :... . _.. Vr ......... - - .LLJ.�i . .. ......... ......... . ;...... ca...:.....: 250 Q.............................................. l . _................... .........:.. ...:.........:......... ......I.. .... .. . .10. . ,.� : 9.38 0/ [t Co -- U > > l� 1 .. . J c�� :�.0,.. V... o W - M . :U U = - (0 O . . . .. . . tn: c� :! • ..�� >> W >> >` .. cv t� ...... SQ (� VC. W ; > - W .0 >' .... .....I... .. ..... J .-_1 . .... ... UJ .. w .. ... I. + O . ... a! . . .... � _-s J .. ......... ....M.W ...... > J:. .. J Qj z W M 0) .'...�_ _ ... _ .. ........ ........ ..... ......... w L. w W > FINISHED GRADE:.. o- .:"' .1-� .. - d:z c'�:.. . . . . . . . . . . . . '- _ l� J W N -! . 4 N. a � d t� . (�- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .. �� Q F-. N . .. 00 N - . } . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.... o W ........ v) 4 .. :tom .... ......... . ... ......... ........ y r ... 0: 505 a 8.9• / >' •cn �: .... :cn �.. �... . ................................. ................. �- ............... 30 .. :..... 3 00 :... >..W...... . ........ __ ........................................ ..... .... �. Ui J:... y.. ... ......... _ . 2 L. 12 . cr,Q , \....... .. CMP . i1 J -. ... ...Ii .. �25LF.:. . .... g _ -:-->t Ii1:.... / CMP a.37 / ' ii + o .. .... �2 ......... ......... ......... ....... . .... , . J2 -1 t- W -ram �p . =}- . . • �� C _ C4:+0: 17.08 . Rl' :B TYP:E I: ... ........:M .... ... >_ :S7A: . C a ... . .. .. . 12 cr�P 6 M d 1. _ Q :U' . - 7 0 :Q N ........... .............j........... 6/0 �. :. : ......... ;. I ....... : ......... : ............ O : � :. GRATE ELEV. 299.21: ......... ... 1- w . CULL ERT "y .......>. ..... . in 3: EXISTING - GROUNQ r. :... Z .... . . ........................__»................................. ..... . ............. .. ........... .. .... .. r - : 290 ..................I.:................. : ............... ........................... : ...................................... ,:... .................................... : ....................................... : .. ....................•...............................sn...�a........... a . Q O r. .> .,� . }Q,_ . ,: : .... l E: 2967. 5l, �4 - I.AI ... ......... ti fl 8� liT . . . ...... - lCGO V.C. f- + }' a o . _ . ... ...................................... .... .. .... ... ......... W _ + - ... ........ .........I......... ti.-.. .� ... . �. ......... ...... ......... ... W....... �.. a. ti..... r:3. c:.. .�,.... 1,...... - ........ ........ .. ....... N?' :a �p : - N 4 ' ......... ...... ... .. :� :c0 - N.... iW p . p. Q I--• ......... . . ....... ........ . p .� r, :) .� 4 k-. cn N .. +: .. ... ......... . ........ . . ... • , .. ..... , .. . -,-. ct:d3:,,,. ... ..Q .. E-- : Sri : \ . tn. cn . .. . . 4.r ..... z Q ,103t' ..: I ... I a .� 4P, as pIn. CID U N m I� -' - + 4+- ..........I........ ................... . . : i . N w N _ _ '..: •... _ .. . .. p _ :� .� . ti O- _ m 8; C, : ' tu.. N-. - . . . . .. . cfl > v Qp - PR4tILE. ....... ... . ..... 2 -� <t N ..... ...... C? _ U j Q . a w o / m c0 W cP : . U rn J Z ! --` h- .... ... ......... I 4 0 Horn ......... i .....: / ° '� i .. ln. N . . ........ I ........ ...... . w .... + h� N 8 d m > cn > LO JN ... ......... = SC A L:E O d vj N ......... Q �. o:....... o a - w a :.to . vrt ,� ° H- tD CV �:� /o. . . . . N. Lil .. . . .... N.. U: o ... .. :�. :o ......... '� . tD' to d .. . . .. rn. t�i. , .. t..: 0)_�:Z . . . . . .. ...... .. . ..... ..... . - ?.. -� -+1: . y�. Q C0: .. . .... �, 'N O i J - 27 ► » ... ......... _ ..... _.... . - - �' 7 t- ...................... �1' li l , 2 0 ............................ - ........................}- t�i F fd I S++Ef} .........cn I - - ....... ..... ... . .... ......... .... sJ F- W GRAD.E . .. .. ..... ... '...... ' ......... ,� N - .. ... . S..... .. ......... V�: I .. -- ... .. 4 ...... ........ H ......... ..... W:.. • a;' �p .j..... ....... V , W .: > J . olo ...... , .. - �0 �� _ .. . /:. .... U. �........ O � �' r7i . W > W W w. c� .... ......... .. v ... ... ......... ......... ....... 9 QJ:...:j J ..... W Q .. i .... p � w co � _ g.W.... ,J .i. 1...... �CC)co ......... ........ .� - .... ......... ......... :m lit > CC : !.... ... d: (� N.cV ..... ......... ... ... ..... ......... Jai .. , .... . , ....... ..... ... , ..... ........ . ...... .i......... ......... a Q _.... m .. ° ......... ..... ......... ......... ........ 0: W C2 ... . .... � . Lo cal • I-•- W r� i F- .. _3 ...... . 6 260 _ w . »...... ................. ........ 0 ....I......I..................... _........ _ - ........... ...........u.......... . ...... ...................................................................................................................�­­, ........................... .. _... r.,, I � �. �... , - -,. �... :11, 1�1. . . . . 0.�'/0. . . . . �, . . . .1: - i I (r Z�. I1. .----.-,-__ _. _.- �: EXI:STING. GROUND: �.,_ ... - , ........ , -o� N . ........ Z W I I ................................. .,. .... ........ ........ .. �.- / ... ........ .........I. I ..... .... .. ........ ........ .... C�J= � .� . I NW ....... ......... ......... ......... ........ ........ - 1. I. 'Q (`- . . .. . . .... j . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .-. .. l� i .... ....... i i c„ >' ? F N ......... I ......... tit> ': W' W s 250 W. - .............................. _ 250 • . .. ._.:.;•.� ..•:,.....:.Y',�y..... _ - _ _ _ :' "t ..,ter. -_ ! .�. .-. .. - - hl ��',-..... ` � - c 0 v D to Scale_ Designed- Drawn- C Checked- Approved- GRAVEL BORROW VAIR;ES 25' TO 29' STA. 15+80_00-R7:1 To STA_ 17+20 C 0 RT. SEE PLAN SHEET 2 of 3 1 ----2 It COMPT. DEPTH CLASS 'B' ASPHALT CONCRETE II/2" MIN. COMP-r. DEPTH CR. SURF. TOP COURSE 2 1/2'' MIN. COMPT, DEPTH CR. SURF. BASE COURSE 4" GRAVEL BASE CLASS B TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION A -�STA. 17+20 TO STA. 18+10 NO scams STA. 10+00 TO STA. 17+20 (Future Canst.) — 25' - ---------------------- VAR I ES 25' to 29 STA. 15+80 RT. to STA. 17+ 20 RT, ROADWAY SECTION B STA. 10+00'TO STA. 17+20' NO SCALE 71 0 12' t 2" COMPT. DEPTH CLASS B \ 4� ASPHALT CONCRETE 4, 2, PROFILE GRADE-\, t 0 2% 2% I' MIN. I 5 /° 5% _ r — Q o�o'�c'.'p`.,?.•py."..o•;�• 0 0 ♦�p'� D Q .po-•s`:no!:o 0 '• oo; D ;a •o ° ' d % o o �_ =%I%9/ _ _ o • _ o.: o 0 0,;�.• 6 0 1 1/2" COMP DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE GRAVEL 02`'9/ ROCK LINE DITCH FOR BORROW �/ Ox EROSION PROTECTION. /x SEE STORM WATER 2 1/2„ COMP. DEPTH CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE Foo�T DRAINAGE NOTE No. �� �2" MIN. :`�� NO21 SHEET No 1 of 3. , . 4 GRAVEL BASE CLASS B •'` TYPICAL DRIVEWAY SECTION N0 SCALE wJ�En PEE ? / P/ MP H01 S£ f"1 f Ex,stP-- -'� EXIS L o rDITCH GRAf MATCH 4' ..t... 6..1.� 41 .. EL.EV. 244.5 ELEV. 242.70 611(min), 4"- 6" QUARRY SPALLS A EMERGENCY OVERFLOW OUTLET SECTION I CAN i ROL STRUCTURE � SEE r-rTAIL _ ROCK _LINEDE. 2I9.30 ' zp NO SCALE _ \ �rTOP of BERM `1 ; I �. i� 3� O _-UPON P ELEV 244.5 51 BOTTOM of POND \ �2� -• _06 ELEV 240.00 TOE of FILL J o ,\ ELEV. (max) ` EXIST. 242.70 GROUND (0BOTTOM of , �., MATCH EXIST. QUARRY SPALLS �@o DITCH 6 (min)'4-6 QUARRY SPALLS EMERGENCY OVERFLOW OUTLET PROFILE NO SCALE __,__z / DETENTION POND PLAN & DETAILS SCALE: 1 "= 20' 240 235 240 Date OC Scale AS Designed — Drawn G W R Checked JA Approved Dwg. 1\lun 3-2715 -U2_c SH I' T