Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SWP271920
DESCRIPTION -ADDRESS DATE DATE - CHUCK'S DATE TO DUE DATE TO RECEIVED REVIEW BERGSTROM BUILDING DEPT. 19S7 - a - zl-eel A 1d Iwjz� Em-mwldl ■ W-mw-"F, / f I 6w" BUILDING DATE TO PLAly N0. PERMIT BILLING �a VEEEWS r No. O Project Name: Building Permit Number. /31,- 7�7 Date to Utility Bi d Tax Lot Number(s) SGuare Footage Assessment 3OD C) /D F - 07 14- 69 9 3 65 5,6 20-b75 >_ Pc5.s i eL V REVIEWS /� ' . . No. r Building Permit Number: Date to Utility Billing: Business or Use: Site Address: Owner/Billing Address: Tax Lot Number(s) Souare Footage Assessment City of Renton Storm Water Utility North Renton Basin Interim Drainage Study to Address Development West of I-405 (Garden Plaza - Park Plaza) May 1988 Introduction An analysis (using SCS TR-55 Program) determining the expected flows at the intersection of Garden Avenue N and N 8th Street produced a peak flow of 223.39 c.f.s. based on a 25 year storm event. The 48" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) running down Garden Avenue N between N 8th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard is grossly inadequate for carrying this flow and the system must be upgraded. In order to have sufficient capacity to carry this flow, a parallel 66" RCP (or material with similar flow characteristics) is required. The length of system to be contributed by the Garden and Park Plaza (see Figure 1) projects was computed using the existing system capacity for allowable outfall and a 25 year design storm. The necessary volume was determined as 18,774 fts which corresponds to approximately 790 l.f. of 66" pipe. To maximize the early benefit, the pipe contributions should be started on the lower end of the system and worked upstream. In lieu of on -site detention, this contribution will be added to as further development continues in the lower portion of the North Renton Basin. That portion of the basin which lies east of SR 405 would remain as an on -site detention region with any drainage problems on this side being corrected by regional detention rather than by upgrading the I-405 crossings. Basin Characteristics The North Renton Basin contains approximately 773 acres consisting of two regions with vastly different characteristics. These regions are separated by I-405. The upper basin area to the east of I-405 is the Highlands region. The lower basin area west of I-405 is the Valley region. The Highlands region is roughly bordered by Sunset Boulevard on the north, NE 4th Street on the south, Monroe Avenue NE on the East, and I-405 on the west. This region slopes down to the west at approximately 5 percent. While development consists mainly of residential, there are some smaller areas covered with apartments, commercial sites, and schools. Soils characteristics vary anywhere between Type A to Type C (reference; Soils Survey King County Area Washington, United States Department of Agriculture Soils Conservation Service, Nov. 1973.) The Highlands region discharges into the Valley region through several culverts crossing under I-405. Flows are transported from the Highlands region through the Valley region out to Lake Washington. The Valley region is bordered by I-405 on the east, Burnett Avenue N on the west, N 4th Street on the south, and Lake Washington on the north. This region has flat slopes and is highly industrialized with a small percentage of residential. The soils category consists of Type C. There are two points of discharge (see Figure 2) from the Valley region. The majority of the flow is discharged through the 48" concrete pipe running north along Garden Avenue N from N 8th Street to Lake Washington Boulevard. From there it discharges through a series of other culverts and open ditches until it reaches Lake Washington. The second outfall is a 24" concrete line running from the end of N 7th Street out to the Cedar River. Due to the shallow slope, the capacity of this line is inadequate, even considering the maximum available head. For this reason, the two systems are interconnected such that the flow which does not flow down the 24" line will backflow into the 48" line running down Garden Avenue N. Page 2 of 5 Peak 25 Year Flow Analysis The North Renton Basin was broken up into 11 separate subbasins (see Figure 2) due to topography, existing storm systems, and critical flow control points. The control points were crossings of I-405 and major storm drainage intersection points where one system was joined by another. Due to time restrictions, it was decided that the peak 25 year flow analysis would be done on the SCS TR-55 Program. Existing and future "CN" values were developed using U.S.G.S. soils maps, aerial photographs, and February 1988 zoning maps (see Figure 3). The travel times and times of concentration were calculated using available information on existing storm systems and topographical information from 1968 City of Renton topographical maps. Running the CN value, time of concentration, and travel time through the TR-55 program for each of the 1 I subbasins, the peak 25 year flow at the outlet point of the intersection of Garden Avenue N and N 8th Street from the North Renton Basin was calculated to be 289.22 c.f.s. Upon further study of the flow control points, it was found that Areas 1, 2, and 3 flowed to a 21" CP with the maximum capacity of 30 c.f.s. The flows exceeded this volume starting at the 7.9 hour mark at which point the excess flow would take an alternate path to the outlet point.. The excess flow (that above 30 c.f.s.) was lagged by approximately 1/2 hour, which is the time determined for the flow to run down Sunset Blvd, cross I-405 through the 30" CMP and travel in a ditch along the west side of 1-405 to a point joining the original flow path. The resulting peak flow was calculated to be 202.0 c.f.s. When a similar adjustment was performed for area No. 6, the peak flow was found to be 199.1 c.f.s. Page 3 of 5 The peak flow which is required to flow down the Garden Avenu N storm line would be the computed peak flow subtracted by the capacity of the 24" CP outfall to the Cedar River. This will yield 186.9 c.f.s. as the necessary volume of flow which the system must eventually carry Existing Capacity The storm line running down Garden consists of approximately 2,375 IS. of 48" RCP with seven manholes in between. Calculating the capacity, using Manning's equation, under full head conditions (headwater at Roadway surface), a maximum flow of 93 c.f.s. will flow through. Through trial and error on the TR-55, a rainfall of 2.0 inches, corresponding to a 2 year storm, yields a peak flow down Garden Avenue N of 93.2 c.f.s. which is the approximate capacity of the system in question. For calculation of development contribution, the 2 year storm will be the allowable outlet criteria based on the existing systems capacity. Upgrade Line Size Based upon the computed capacity of the existing line down Garden Avenue N and the computed peak 25 year flow, using Manning's equation, it was determined that a 66" pipe with an "n" value of 0.012 is required to parallel the existing 48" RCP. A head of 5.3' is needed to push the 25 year flow through this parallel system of pipes which will discharge into the ponding area on the south side of Lake Washington Boulevard before crossing beneath the road via two 48" CP culverts. Contribution by Park and Garden Plaza On -site detention required for the Park Plaza and Garden Plaza projects was calculated using a 25 year storm with the release rate restricted to the capacity of the existing system (2 year storm). For Page 4 of 5 simplification purposes, all three sites were combined as one with an average CN and the longest Tc taken for the site. The combined sites resulted in an area of 10.4 acres, CN of 92, and the longest Tc being 16 min. Running the calculated numbers through the SCS TR-20 program, a predevelopment 2 year flow of 3.02 c.f.s. was computed. For post development conditions, the same Tc and a CN of 98 were assumed. Passing the post development flows through a simulated detention system (using a structure and reservoir card based on a 66" pipe with a single orifice and overflow at the top of the pipe), successive runs were performed increasing the length of the pipe until the maximum outflow of 3.02 c.f.s. was attained without encountering overflow conditions. The necessary volume to fit these conditions is 18,774 ft3 of detention. This corresponds to approximately 790 IS. of 66" pipe which is required, in lieu of on -site detention, to fulfill the requirements. Page 5 of 5 PLAN REVIEWS No. —FtY,— Project Name: (-' Building Permit Number: Date to Utility Billing: Business or Use: / Tax Lot Number(s) 7223020/0y-C,7 Sauare Footage Ann ment 'Iel '6� T E R 0 F F I C E M E TO: r/ LIE7f FROM:el4q"�,Pi/GE l Q SUBJECT s DATE : ✓ / /�� ' 1-aJJ_.1J-1-I...�-.1 �1 �►.-►�-..1J-1Jv.fJ��f J-..»J�1-1J��1JJ-aJ-..Jt.���l-. �.JJJJ�1 �i-1-.iJ-A �-b u, Li rt�Pt-t-r-U,WWIr,Wwli,Vl;ilWWW41WlNWWw(.IWWWWI.Jlf1WWlNwwl:,(.K)JWI.lVI4wli,w4L.JwWUJ(r,lAAL1JWC UUUUGUAU•Ot)`CJ^U•tI-CJ•UO10U'4)IO•O4UTA,p-O'O.O,U1C),0'UU'U-0�OCIA) O•p-0-4)U"UWnD►1 \ C7UC`1 CJ!_]C7 `O�•tl'Cl `O't)WW1)�W(pQ)VJW'VN�1'�I-J'��1111t �1fTC1•(T(7[7 UfTO OVI V,VIVtV1V,(11V,ll, Vtl�i(..JW fJ%Nr n�rn VI�4JIV�(� •UOOWN�d,O("-Jt-WN--tU•UW -JP-(n t�WN->•C..) UW �1(T 1�WIV --�O �O W'V tT Vtt�WN-•>•(�`U UO 'J �JW V Z CJDl r G co, V W 10 -, (x, A V+Jp.. 0 0 NO)Qt U�t�OVt .� (� 17C10 0, W In �! N-4O"- IA(A) -Jr1Vt Vlf1J-bLDL4-hUi,AW-�Vr--�rvl.7"J'V �l-'I,JyUf7�li,IvfvU-' l_l-J C:)C+MkM'M )u ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ \ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ \ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ \ \ ♦ \ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ \ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ 3 JuIO Ow�rjC)r vl.,Cl c,(SuvINUO(T(nUU uvl--IlnvIooaED UU1't•Wn)-4OcjwV Ctrt7rlf..,UV1c3vlQtOu ►+ I t C)Ur•IT+Vtt=)UL,O-HOC.)UU1;.7(�UOC)C�C�IJOU(�Ol,r-Ur�WC:JwWL,-�1v1U(�•OUVI(J•OL,C'�Uv,U(Tr CJU -1 I C.,(.]CO)vtCfUCJGUCt(DfIC.)GC,(UC.:)C)C)cjUOC7(jWV+VI(JUNO--%-'IJtIIC)"CYC:)Can!ORUC'W(--IWNC.)(J In 7)CJ v, (J)C=C-II%IIInC (.11-J�m3nC71nL�mI>C1HZC)r-<• r. rnlaUuZnlx)rt1--17uGlZC7r►-�1C�fn 2 1-4)1r-uC-1111 t_7zz"r. -!_r"loll ulfr- ('-1 Z -41-11Z NGlzn (. IIII ;VUL•4I t•-I V III 7V -UL7:;J)>r In?V, z --IYIx1<01 Df11 111V, C)CJIn? • CJ 7(U2vlUlltntl-(�'D� r11tn Fwr to t/tvl:Czz-7v7- LAI.- (/s nt :t -1 C C> N J> G-1 C= f/I Vt U ►-1 - -"Uj-((;l C D Z 11117J-imor, I-t zC.)S HI M z Z.C_)(-3W -( In731911 -4 U C) C) Z D Y V,Inln 1-+ z rJ oil fit x) VI 3 -+ (1 1-+ r Ill fit In z U Cl I lif\IlVl/lt�)--)(11l IIIJW (A!V'[)l)1f.Y1 r•NIJI --� CjvtVt->•WVC)O f Vtli1•pW�l(JC)GnJU f�-�N00--t(VC7Ul•,(.IONOvI p--�U�CJ -J VIO rv-+ 'n--I V (j -'O tom, U U -I_ -1 C 7- C71 c•2_Z2(_.Ut�t•?tnZ71Z 7_U•Cz JJ:11r1fTt7_ n7(/f"1DInn1r111)H+Wfllfll A All FI<;K:r-0 ?C) 7.Z_W -4--41".)1, 1-1 Inr-O• 0V1 r>Zln(T VI InU LI 3L lit CJ Z to 1> (n 111 -4 -A -4 (A 0-1 -4 <C)-4-4 < 1YS n ZZ-J1: ;)XXnn L< I><Vr 7_ --i « Z < D (n Vt -O < 1V,(A r- r- N--IU<-4 It-I-17-V, it V,f- Vtrll J(l TI J E M F., (AVI Iv t/r -.,vl O 1 t I Iv 11ill t„Cl'I W L-III I :L .VC If: :L J :I -"IJ I-1111 C] nU lit111 Y Ja-y>MITI Vrvfll-4znl3 - H-cCIHIn�VC.)l:7 <(nV1C-7U -+G1Z rn?tnGlnnl-tbST.n,ftl Z m(,)C1.1]Gl O J'.J;V uA)Il1ITIJV A ;1rtl -nN C-7-(n(In C-<";U to Vt 7zCl7VZ nfl77GNU) Dn7z _I III tJ D z Z r Z Z C_ -1. 'I v A tG, -Ir) III C)1J-IClr7C)t> III t7_a VI IC, JV Z'Ifl Illfll In flirt wv it (l V 2 v n x rlrVIDNNTq N-� f�J l/11V-►r�JN(n' -CIO-o c)wr 1.,(»(nry AO Vl--ANVIVIN V 10 OM -V u 0 jD 11•1- 11 ntf"►-1L 1111'�C>7_ �aJ�r[7;o1n►/rin,nlJ�E1n ►^xrF37K Zf 31n,n II 1_ �[l ANwo(/Ir IJ' rlrnzYF-.noun-+nzar-� -rz 7Z(n ;Z 1. In< 11 n VtL>CVIV+n V, it <f I z 1 zIn z G rn0 rn In(A �- IQ MX;j" 1c 1- 11 U.3 F4l -1 l 1 11 1 J J I I11f 1 Z 1 1 1 11 11 It If Jr it P If ( 1 I 1 ( TI ) t 1 ) ) 1. t 11 I 11 Mt + : (. i OM -1 IT(:Il - 11 1 1 It 1 f l , � + ► 1 ( I l 7 7 j 1X t ( ,-Z 11 1jwl it I W nl l r It I 1 1 II 1(1 6 1 1 1 I Till 1 1 (n f l fit 1 / 1 1 r 11 It tj 1 1 1 / I II If if 1 I I t II If II II I .: I. +1 1 Q l. I , 1 ( ►11+1 -I (. I I 1ill, 1 T f1 ►1 1 , ) ( I It It 4 V) 1 I inII 111 I 1 1 Inlr 1 7- L :I ;) fn" .1. 1- -I r 2' JUIIICI;(7• D;AD 1 I z(JIM (l1><3 -1 -C� 7l 7C 3 H L• C7--(fT11 Tl -3 T M z .VCl1nD-i If 70r f- Cn 2: :3 -t JU r 71 C) c'7►�:3 70 n1U :I.InU LCl (n JU cltJZ ZJJ(Az) L) I If V, r-) r- r S N O r^ r' U LN-i t - ►r7C.'1 Ou-»rC) J 7V r-) fV O In T• W 7r7 -h ;U Jul I +;U 1-- L• (/) Y n f:E NZC)1-+1-1 F_JUH n zI-/Zz7- 7Cz --JoItIV,I-11I I-4 -1 ;u O t o -s rn n 1 S In z 11MvI <;V C VI <E D 7 n < n VI E Z w VI In / ) I-1 If I ( 111 it 1 1 1 1 + Il 7 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 ). 1 1 t + 1C I I 1 l + / n ( tt It + C_ (11 4 C- I` V C- C- (tI U) f U li1 C_ U rn nl (7 1p U )'- r, - J> (7 1.0 VI ( 1 m (), U-, (n(A �(n tl7 FI1, I -,jI I (J) 11/ W CJI I I J,vrwx v, v. LA r v FI►+H D)► / PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: /? —Iq APPLICANT: �— �A C, GQ 2 fl � eo� JOB ADDRESS: �w) ll cA— NATURE OF WOW: QV-Q L TO: Comments Due Comments Due I I ENGINEERING DIVISION I I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I I BUILDING CODE REVIEW UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I I ZONING & PARKING I I OTHERS StDCM / Z� Z II I ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION } �� ilk/%� �---- L�] I I_ 1 1 APPROVED I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I=^I NOT APPROVED 1-20 /r5 jh r C7)4 xiX 1, -, I z ! -f DATE r= Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I NOT APPROVED JOB 9 24, + JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES 622 S Central KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 SHEET NO. I OF 1 CALCULATED BY DATE +` 1, { do'% CHECKED BY DATE SCALE �vEFZI.Art`1� 1 l7LO..) VE(.x T-T 110 = b,94 .�"/q1t 0. 3 S 3 w-,r-S 4s's 7 O.qS 1�5 3 `LFS a Al M I iz.. UMM, Mln 01471 JOB JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES 622 S Central KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 SHEET NO. CALCULATED BV CHECKED BY SCALE Of ` DATE DATE Mr&j o Zo�Zo t bi gZ) VT = vs -k C.o = 1,359-. 3 ir Z5 Z * o, 5o = VT = 3 I b 2✓ G'F e E c�� o sTo RA�-� � mmicrmai[mr#,iP z &.w m- cim JOB SHEET NO. 3 OF JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES c I 622 S Central CALCULATED BYyLiD OATEN KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE A3 0, Za43 D D _ -79 Sr- O,loZ 2 v 3 Z L2, 42) T I r roar MI NL H3 Mt., c'., mm 01471. JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES 622 S Central KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 51 P_d ' JOB - 4 Q. SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY S C 1 DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE !.. _..�_. �___...._.,... I E .....i ........ _�. .. .... ..I. .. I I I t now 2w] i E 1tt_ &vim Yet 01471. � A T E R 0 F F I CE ME__0 TO: r/ DATE: ✓ / /�� FROM: SUBJECT: • - JOHN R. EWING & ASSI .TES 1314 S. Central, Suite 200 KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (206) 852-6633 TO Cy- l '�7--Mc _ WE ARE SENDING YOU Li Attached L Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings LI Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter CJ Change order ❑ LIT-TT[L.- of URRAMATTRA, DATE JOB NG� ' ,24,rs' ATTENTIO NRE ���� �TF CAU-QC A the following items: Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION Z _ .:> b r-1 tr (a M(( C,(C f�� (U/�S >C l�(.aZ/1 j (t IYAZ4 13i rF E Su F. -SAS IN 0 �4 i g1 E Pt�2 �' A ZA Z tir-STYE S7a�Zi`^ r i?,c�vi�rl7 PART Pc�R � Ci A. Z C)Ir N RdZ�1 THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ❑ Approved as submitted AFor your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS 4N IN ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED: S i Foe L_ PRODUCT 2"2 e s I.. Gaol, Alga 0 14 71 It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. APPLICANT: JOB ADDRESS: > NAT LIRE OF WORK • TO: PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP ��- 1l,s oLi-H Comments Due DATE: Comments Due I ENGINEERING UIVISIUN I ( FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I TRAFFIC ENG. UIVISIUN I I BUILDING CODE REVIEW I I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I I ZONING & PARKING I I OTHERS -` _> l l AIL P\ I ( ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be Please provide corrrnents to the Building Division b 5:00 Provided Y p.m, on above date. REVIEWING DEPARIMENT/DIVISION_ ' In writing. ��! I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDiTiONS I I NOT APPROVED Signature of Director or Authorized Representa ve TE/z—// V7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/UIVISIUN I I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I ( NOT APPROVED t �N14,W OF R� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 0 235-2631 � MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 9.0 �• 0 9�TFO SEPTE-0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH July 21, 1987 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Dick Houghton ERC Committee Don Monaghan Ron Olsen Gary Norris shuck Price John Adamson FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: North Renton E&H/Boeing Office Buildings Garden Plaza and Park Plaza This memo outlines the major impacts to the Director of Public Works from the two E&H/Boeing Buildings. SANITARY SEWERS Parr Plaza Large grease/oil/water separator required on food service and garage drains. Garden Plaza Existing 8" and 10" mid block sanitary sewers must be re—routed and easement vacated. New sanitary sewer shall be constructed in Park Ave. N., southerly to So. 5th Street. Large grease/oil/water separator required on food service and garage drains. New sanitary sewer must be operational before old sewer is taken out of service. WATERMAINS Park Plaza Existing 16" watermain across the site must be relocated. New watermain must be realigned and operational before the 16" watermain is taken out of service for foundation construction at Park Plaza. MEMO July 21, 1987 Page 2 Rnth Citric Fire Marshall must assign fire flow demands first, then E&H provide fire flow computer analysis to determine watermains needed in City watermain system to provide fire flows. All streets reconstructed/widen must have new 12" minimum) size watermains: North 5th Street - Garden to Park; Park Avenue North - N. 5th to N. 8th; North 6th Street - Garden Ave. N. to Park and perhaps to West. STORM DRAINAGE Rnth Citric Provide storm drainage analysis of projects, and analyze down stream storm system on North 6th Street westerly to Cedar River. Provide 10/10 Year Storm Detention on site to control run off to predeveloped rates -012. Provide storm improvements down stream to allow no detention. All streets reconstructed/widened shall have new storm drains constructed to provide 25-year capacity on local drainage and 50-year on trunk capacity lines: North 5th Street - Park to Garden; Park Avenue North - N. 5th St. to N. 8th St.; North 6th Street - Garden to Park and perhaps to West. Other storm improvements may be required in area to prevent flooding of key intersections, buildings, fire access and rescue staging areas. STREET/ROADS/TRAFFIC Both Sites Impact Fees Bonded - Garden Plaza Park Plaza $660,943 488,000 TSM Program both sites - 30% trips by transit or car pool is target. New street lights and underground telephone and power conversion along all street frontages and streets reconstructed/widened. MEMO July 21, 1987 Page 3 Garden Plaza Provide P,S,&E Design) of intersection improvements at Lake Washington/Houser/Garden/Park intersection. New Traffic Signal at North 6th and Garden. Widen Park Ave. N. - from N. 5th to N. 6th to 5 lanes. Reconstruct N. 5th St. - Garden to Park and channelize for 3 lanes. Provide HOV drop-off lane in front of building on N. 6th St. Park Plaza Construct street and intersection improvements at Lake Washington/Houser/Garden/Park intersection. Widen Park Ave. N. - from N. 6th to N. 8th to 5 lanes. Provide HOV drop-off lane in front of building on Park Ave. N. Construction Period Problems This project will cause serious problems to traffic and utility service if not well scheduled and coordinated. As at the Main/Grady/Benson site, there are problems with staging, moving materials to the site and utility trenching. Because E&H always gets their foundation permits prior to most of the utility design, the two projects here have a major problem because of interfering utilities that the City already owns thru the sites. MEMO July 21, 1987 Page 4 MY SUGGESTIONS Garden Plaza Construct sanitary sewer bypass on Park Ave. N. - work non -peak hour. Close N. 6th St. - Park to Garden for staging. Construct foundation - etc. Design street and utility improvements. and AC pave Park and 5th all Construct temporary traffic signals at N. 8th and Garden "Dog Legs" - sign detour route around Park Ave. N. Construct Park Ave. N. street and utility improvements - winter time construction - probably require PCC Pavement. Limit traffic to 2 lanes - 1 northbound and 1 southbound. Open Park Ave. N. - 5 lanes. Construct other utilities and streets. Open all roads and dismantle detours. Dmrt, Dl non Construct new 16" watermain in N. 6th St - Garden to apartments to bypass site - all work non - peak hour and AC pave N. 6th St. Close N. 6th St. - Park to Garden - for staging. Construct foundations. Design street and utility improvements. After N. 6th St. - Park to Garden open see #9 above) and before dismantling N 8th and Garden - temporary signals, construct Park Ave. N. - street and utility improvements - winter construction PCC? Limit traffic on Park to 2 lanes - 1 northbound and 1 southbound. Open Park Ave. N. - 5 lanes Construct other utilities and streets. Open all roads, dismantle detours. 2D.12.5.6/REB:ckd 0,,� T PQI Bob Bergstrom APPLICANT: JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WOR TO: PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: /, 2 Comments Due Comments Due I I ENGINEERING DIVISION ( I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I ( BUILDING CODE REVIEW I I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I ( ZONING & PARKING OTHERS -Z (�42 N\ ( ( ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENTIDIVISION_ �I �> � ��y�r� � T ,) � � i � j y X I APPROVED ( I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I NOT APPROVED Signature of Director` or Authorize( Kepresentative DATE /Z.—%,'— V 7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION I I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I NOT APPROVED Q@ Planter National Me insurance Compuy WAENINOTON TITLE DIVISION Filed for Record at Request of TO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Renton Municipal Bldg. Mill Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 THIS SPACE 1ES10&G E ii(PORDCR 9 USE. By THE DIYI:��t)N (iF �ZEG04GS ti'iUti KING CO"JW � 8 R r Garden Plaza Off -site Storm 15/04 #01' r D E-CD F 5.00 ASHSL :+::+:4::+.5. 00 55 ' FORM L ]211 BILL OF SALE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That E & H Properties of Bellevue County of King , State of Washington, the part y of the first part. for and in consideration of the sum of one and no/100 ----------------------------- --------------P -- Y-------y--Dollars lawful money of the United States of America, to them in hand aid b The City of Renton the party of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does by these presents grant, bargain, sell and deliver unto the said party of the second part the following described personal property now located at Garden Ave N from N. Park Dr. to �16'+ S of N. Park Dr. in the City of Renton , County of King and State of Washington, to -wit: Approximately 867 L.F. of 72" storm class II concrete pipe and 15 ft. of 36" concrete pipe and all appurtenances pertaining to said storm sewer system expressly warranting said storm main against any expenses, costs or liens thereto incurred by, through or under seller herein. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same to the said party of the second pzrt, i t s heirs, executors. administrators and assigns forever. And said party of the first part, for i t s heirs, executors, administrators, covenant s and agrees to and with the said party of the second part, i t s executors, administrators and assigns, that said part y of the first part is the owner of the said property, goods and chattels and has good right and full authority to sell the same, and that i t will warrant and defend the sale hereby made unto the said party of the second part, i_ t s executors, administrators and assigns, against all and every person or persons, whomsoever, lawfully claiming or to claim the same, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said part y of the first part has hereunto set hi s band and aexl this 21 s r day of A�R/L, 760 9 (SEAL) Direc of Con tr iorl (sue) STATE OF WASHINGTON. Ss. County of King (SEAL) (SEAL) On this day personally appeared before me George B . Boyd to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument. ar.d acknowledged that }1e signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed. for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 21 s t day of AP ' 1 , 1989 L No ary Public in and for the State of 141ashington, residing at SUBJECT: _6692ar-4 CITY PROJECT 14UIIBERS: W- Garden Ave Storm Drain S- _ NAME OF PROJECT �E GC�NT1 IG• ICTI�N f�L.4�rl,5TKVGT/1Pt.1 Go. TO: CITY OF RENTON FROM: E & H Properties UTILITIES DIVISION 200 MILL AVE. SO. 12?o IIe."I/VM. E. RENTON WA 98055 Bellevue, Wa 98004 DATE: 2/ 1 t7�$'�j Per your request, the following information is furnished concerning costs for improve- ments installed for the above referenced project. WATER SYSTEM: Length Size Type L.F. OF L.F. OF L.F. OF L.F. OF EACH OF EACH OF EACH OF Size EACH OF WATERMAIN WATERMAIN WAT ER14A I N WATERMAIN GATE VALVES GATE VALVES " GATE VALVES Type SUBTOTAL $ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES $ (COST OF FIRE HYDRANTS MUST BE LISTED SEPARATELY). SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: Length L.F. OF L. F. OF L.F. OF EACH OF TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM $ Size Type of SEWER MAIN of SEWER MAIN it SEWER MAIN DIAMETER MANHOLES TOTAL COST FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM $ STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM: r Length Size Type 'aA7 ,��� L.F. OF 72 "concreteSTORM LINE L.F. OF _ toSTORM LINE L.F. OF to STORM LINE L.F. OF to STORM LINE TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM $ 310,894. 38 STREET IMPROVEMENTS: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk) Restored only what we damaged during our installation process. TOTAL COST FOR STREET IMPROVEMENIS $ J. Z `� �SIGNAT (SIGNATORY MUST BE AUTHORIZED AGENT OR OWNER OF SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT) JOB ---511 ? JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES 622 S Central KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 .................................. � i 1 SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY 5�'n DATE_�vr CHECKED BY DATE SCALE U HIMkT iLI ®le. QiMR Ila NOL E & H PROPERTIES P.O. Box 598 Bellevue, WA 98009-0598 (206) 454-5959 TO ✓%�l/GK /'/�/ r MVP 1:, 198� WE ARE SENDING YOU XAttached ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order CITY OF RENTON ❑ urVf,zgia�ee►�pra [L[EUTEa o1F UMRS UMM L DATE JOB NO, ATTENTION RE Si On�� WATER UTILITY Ep 1988 the following items: ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: XFor approval ❑ Approved as submitted Resubmit ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted CJ Submit ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return — El For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE copies for approval copies for distribution corrected prints 19 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS —_ COPY TO SIGNED-. . If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at Manufacturers of Concrete Sewer and P.O. Box 9156 Tacoma, WA 98409 Culvert Pipe — (206) 475-8888 Precast Manholes — RENTON (206) 255-1521 Low Head Pressure Pipe — SEATTLE (206) 623-7772 FAX (206) 474-7631 Transformer Vaults - WA WATS (800) 922-5338 Specialty Items — Precast and Prestressed Concrete MATERIAL SOURCES PLANT DRYCAST: CONFORMING ASTM STD.: SUPPLIER: Cement -Type I -II C 150 Tilbury Cement Co. Bellingham,Wa Flyash C 618 Pozzolanic NW, Centralia 3/81, Washed Rock C 33 NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom Pipe Sand C 33 NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom Reinforcing Wire A 496 Davis Walker, Kent, Wash. Rubber Gaskets C 443 & C 361 Best Fitt Co. Everett, Wash. PRECAST: Cement - Type III LA C 150 Tilbury Cement Co. Bellingham,Wa 3/41, Washed Rock C 33 NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom Pipe Sand C 33 NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom WRDA 19 (Super Plasticizer) C 494 W. R. Grace Co. Redmond Daravair (Air Entraining) C 260 W. R. Grace Co. Redmond Reinforcing Mesh A 185 Bergandi Mfg. So. Elmonte, Ca. Reinforcing Rebar A 615 GR 60 Salmon Bay Steel Corp. Seattle Rubber Gaskets C 443 & C 361 Best Fitt Co. Everett Sincerely yours, Jim Trueblood, Engineering Plant Locations: 4601 South Orchard, Tacoma, WA / 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd, Portland, OR / 8908 N.E. Highway 99, Vancouver, WA / Member: Pacific Northwest Concrete Pipe Association / American Concrete Pipe Association Pacific International pipe & Engineering,(Inc::A'; 1P 4601 S. Orchard 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd. 8908 N.E. Highway 99 620 River Road 5032 Dallas Hwy. N.W (P.O. Box 9156) (P.O. Box 11305) Vancouver, WA 98665 Rio Vista, CA (P.O. Box 5249) Tacoma, WA 98409 Portland, OR 97211 (206) 574.3666 (VANC) 94571 Salem, OR 97304 (206) 475.6888 (TAC) (503) 285.8391 (206) 623.7772 (SEA) (503) 485.298E (PORT) (707) 374.6173 (503) 585.7350 t • iI 48" MANHOLES 7Ef✓ Tope ,. A .A w III w. -- / - _ t _ 11 _ , _17 i-0 Base Sections are available In various depths. Channels are provide by the contractor after Installation. Special Knockouts or cutouts are manu- factured to order. Manhole sections are available in heights of 1' through 1 2'. Provisions for lifting are provided In all units. All Joints are designed for use with Rubber Gaskets. Manholes conform to ASTM C-478. Minor Grade adjustments are made with 2"-3"-4" or 6" adjusting rings. Standard manhole steps and/or ladders are furnished with all units. As specified. f; I Fr • -r 4 AZLJ 5Fr• 5eTtdNS AS PE CPU I Fen i�T. Td �_ All Joints ` Ft,I1>(✓12S ��" use a con- UWVrSn fined round C gx' - �% — rubber gask- LbEb 1ti at meeting r, 1L �� Plrt; ASTM C-443 ; {`��} specifications:...,'1 r. •• A. P.W.A. Ladders are Standard. Standard Steps Available. EFFECTIVE:8.1.63 ' 1 tiII+ a �-J If- . Pacific International pipe & Engineering, Inc. 4601 S. Orchard 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd, 8908 N.E. Highway 99 620 River Road 5032 Dallas Hwy. N.W (P.O. Box 9156) (P.O. Box 11305) Vancouver, WA 98665 Rla Vida, CA (P.O. Box 5249) Tacoma, WA 98409 Portland, OR 97211 (206) 574.3666 (VANC) 94571 Salem, OR 97304 (206) 475.8880 (TAC) (503) 265.8391 (503) 285.2988 (PORT) (707) 374.6173 (503) 585.7350 (206) 623.7772 (SEA) 10,114 $II4 az:'�4G, _.I I.cc•ESS I 11 I Zo MAl.fhfOL� Gjt-f of Se_ATrLX P uTuK£ o u rf;..A,L'L. Base Sections are available In various depths. Channels are provided by the contractor after Installation. Special knockouts or cutouts are manu- factured to order. Manhole sections are available In heights of 1' through 8'. Provisions for Ifftfng are provided in all units. All joints are designed for use with Rubber Gaskets. Manholes conform to ASTM C-47B. Minor Grade adjustments are made with 2"-W-4" or 6" adjusting rings. Standard manhole steps and/or ladders are furnished with all units. As specified. 1 - All joints use a con- flned round rubber gasket, i meeting ASTM C-443. 120" EFFECTIVE 8 1•63 GROOVE- W 101*0(1h; c AVER AGE ULERANCE F.0 nl(o? DIMENSIONS d M(DIAMETER, �A,ERAGE I TOLERANCE ! AVERAGE TOLERANCE ,31+.00 i I N(DIAMETt.R) AVERAGE I TOLERANCE i SLOPE RUBBER GASKET ! DEGREES lUNSTRETCHtD�o DURO— VOLUME DIAMET=Rt STRETC METER CUBIC INCHES G H p A _ R ANCES I S S2 3 4 IDESIGN MMADESIGN a.coy� S DEGo B E F T X, X Z Y AVERAGE TOLERANCE I Ftos�»d' ti.iay I MINiMUM MAXIMI;M MINIMUM MAXIMUM o.to _ . . o . 3/ . i 5a•r eett S , re. L G I B..o Ai} ccN'p.w .. I. ..o w :b-8C NOTES All dimensions shall be given it inches, unless otherwise noted, and are for bell and spigot in concertric position. Distance A shall be for full joint closure. JOINT DATA FORM MANUFACTURED, JOINT TYPE (DENT:=:CATION NO. LQ w a-w GROOVE aM Q AVERAGE C WIDTH(W) R TOLERANCE DIMENSIONS d AVERAGE I TOLERANCE M(DIAMETER)I N(DIAMETF_R) AVERAGE 1 ?;;LERANCE I AVERAGE TOLERANCE B E F T XI F X2 Y MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM AVERAGE TOLERANCE .1 j •Z y T 4-11. 1 01 (TPZ-ft1T0-H1-1 NOTES All dimensions shall be given in inches, unless otherwise noted, and are for bell and spigot in concentric position. Distance A shall be for full joint closure. + X I i? �— X 2 PERPENDICULARITY DETAIL v LO IT — Groove v v � m z JOINT DETAIL T— R S 3 '1 1` '1 S4 SPIGOT GROOVE DETAIL JOINT DATA FORM MANUFACTURER Z JOINT TYPE IDENTiFiCATION NO w • P.O. Box 9156 Tacoma, WA 98409 475-8888 REN RENTON (206) 255-1521 SEATTLE (206) 623-7772 FAX (206) 474-7631 WA WATS (800) 922-5338 PLANT DRYCAST: Cement -Type I -II Flyash 3/8" Washed Rock Pipe Sand Reinforcing Wire Rubber Gaskets PRECAST: Cement - Type III LA 3/41, Washed Rock MATERIAL SOURCES CONFORMING ASTM STD.: C 150 C 618 C 33 C 33 A 496 C 443 & C 361 C 150 C 33 Pipe Sand C 33 PIRDA 19 (Super Plasticizer) C 494 Daravair (Air Entraining) C 260 Reinforcing Mesh A 185 Reinforcing Rebar A 615 GR 60 Rubber Gaskets C 443 & C 361 Sincerely yours, • r� Jim Trueblood, Engineering Manufacturers of Concrete Sewer and Culvert Pipe — Precast Manholes — Low Head Pressure Pipe — Transformer Vaults - Specialty Items — Precast and Prestressed Concrete SUPPLIER: Tilbury Cement Co. Bellingham,Wa Pozzolanic NW, Centralia NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom Davis Walker, Kent, Wash. Best Fitt Co. Everett, Wash. Tilbury Cement Co. Bellingham,Wa NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom W. R. Grace Co. Redmond W. R. Grace Co. Redmond Bergandi Mfg. So. Elmonte, Ca. Salmon Bay Steel Corp. Seattle Best Fitt Co. Everett Plant Locations: 4601 South Orchard, Tacoma, WA / 755 N E. Columbia Blvd., Portland, OR / 8908 N.E. Highway 99. Vancouver, WA / Member. Pacific Northwest Concrete Pipe Association / American Concrete Pipe Association Pacific International pipe & Engineering, Inc: .�N 0 4601 S. Orchard 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd. 8908 N.E. Highway 99 620 River Road 5032 Dallas Hwy. N,W (P.O. Box 9156) (P.O. Box 11305) Vancouver, WA 98665 Rio Vista, CA (P.O. Box 5249) Tacoma, WA 98409 Portland, OR 97211 (206) 574.3666 (VANC) 94571 Salem, OR 97304I%P 1. (206) 475.8888 (TAC) (503) 285.8391 (503) 265.2988 (PORT) (707) 374.6173 (503) 585.7350 ' �—' (206) 623.7772 (SEA) 48" MANHOLES F-o)L TES Topes is \ / Base Sections are available In various depths. Channels are provide by the contractor after Installation. Special Knockouts or cutouts are menu- factured to order. •1 Manhole sections are available in heights of 1' through 12'. S24 Provisions for lifting are provided In all units. •r1— ;' — — — — All joints are designed for use with Rubber Gaskets. 121i+ pipe C 8'i yZ)I o. n. ) Manholes conform to ASTM C-478. Minor Grade adjustments are made with 2"•3"-4" or 6" adjusting rings. Standard manhole steps and/or ladders are furnished with all units. As specified. r14lw ll AS P'E CPU I jiEtg II`T. To / J' it ZF?• All joints Rly I✓�5 use a con LLWVTC0 +� fined round t C-AG1E �`' rubber gask- ,�,, v-4L10En -tti et meeting PI?6 ASTM C-443 specifications: A.P.W.A. Ladders are Standard. Standard Steps Available. EFFECTIVE: 5-1.83 ' Pacific International pipe & Engineering, lnc ";" 4601 S. Orchard 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd. 8908 N.E. Hlghway 99 620 River Road 5032 Dallas Hwy- N,W (P.O. Box 9156) (P.O. Box 11305) Vancouver, WA 98665 Rlo Vista, CA (P.O. Box 5249) Tacoma, WA 98409 Portland, OR 97211 (206) 574-3666 (VANC) 94571 Salem, OR 97304 i (206) 475.8888 JAC) (503) 285.8391 (503) 285.2988 (PORT) (707) 374.6173 (503) 585.7350 `-� (206) 623.7772 (SEA) • i 48" MANHOLES FoR- y'61E-, 1' b 24* 1Ztl� Pipe C 8'► yZ!' o• D. ) I Fr. TµRU 5 FT SeT tdl,45 AS IzECPU I REt7 II`r• To / d 2F7. GA4 e` Base Sections are available in various depths. Channels are provide by the contractor after installation. Special Knockouts or cutouts are manu- factured to order. Manhole sections are available in heights of 1' through 1 2'. Provisions for lifting are provided In all units. All Joints are designed for use with Rubber Gaskets. Manholes conform to ASTM C•478. Minor Grade adjustments are made with 2"-3"-4" or 6" adjusting rings. Standard manhole steps and/or ladders are furnished with all units. As specified. A.P.W.A. Ladders are Standard, Standard Steps Available. All Joints use a con- fined round ; t• ., rubber gask- et meeting ASTM C-443 I, specifications: EFFEC111VE:8.1.83 ' UIMt.N5IUI`J11-1 I� GRCCVE 'N1DTH(W") d M(DIAMETER) N(DIAMETER) I AvE,AGL TOLERaNCE AVERAGE TOLERaN�E AVERAGE TOLERANCE AvE<AGE TOLERANCE I - SLOPE DEGREES RUBBER GASKET G Q-0Or S H D EG o o r IS A UNSTRETCHED DIAMETER °° STRETCH DESIGN DURO— METER VOLUME CUBIC INCHES SI S2 I S3 S4 DESIGN , AVERAGE TOLERANCE MIN MAXDESIGN ' &kflz 9� B E Flos�lSrd 4'•%98 F T XI X2 Y AVERAGE TOLERANCE MINiMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM 7. o•io 3/ • :$4•Y our.5./,r PERPENDICULARITY DETAIL �L G� o s • I�'•-- B .� Q d A• .e N o W .'•. • .o. �- E- 1 o o G+oove v v v o z n JOINT DETAIL w —� t S I� IS 3� 4 SPIGOT GROOVE DETAIL NOTES All dimensions shall be given in inches, unless otherwise noted, and are for bell and spigot in concer.!ric position. Disionce A shall be for full joint closure. JOINT DATA FORM MANUFACTURER JOINT TYPE-- m IDENTiFICATIC-)N NO. j1L�%'� 4 % s.}- o dMEW Earl Clymer, Mayor CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: August 29, 1988 TO: Don Monaghan, Acting City Engineer FROM: Garth Cray, Storm Water Utility SUBJECT: Victoria Hills Detention Pond Design/Utility Engineering On August 25, 1988 a meeting was held on -site between myself, Elmer Shaver, and Kurt Serwold of the Garrity Company. The following items were discussed with regard to the cleaning of the detention pond: 1. Pumps would be used to bypass the flows around the detention area and would be maintained 24 hours a day during the length of construction. 2. Straw hay bales would be placed around the outlet cage with a sump area dug to trap any silt in the pond resulting from a storm occurrence. 3. Following construction finish, the exposed areas in the pond will be seeded to reestablish vegetation. 4. Due to the location of the fence on the south side of the pond, the slope on that side was to be maintained at its present steepness in order to facilitate the necessary detention size. Following the meeting, I contacted Elmer regarding the effect on the volume of the 2:1 slope, on the south side of the pond. It was decided that the Contractor would be required to have the Consulting Engineer check into possible volume problems. Garth D. Cray cg/vic-mtg/gdc: jlm cc: Elmer Shaver Kurt Serwold, Garrity Co. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2631 Chri$tine; Gregoire 1 1BriY ` Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ,�,tai! Stop pV-11 • O/vmpia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 July 29, 1988 Mr. Donald Erickson City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: POLICY Dc/ELC^ .VEr.JT 11:' R715ici7 CITY OF PErjgoN AUG 2 1988Ll rr 4- Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance for the modification of the King County Consolidated Office and Repair Facility (CU-038-88). 1. All wastewater and contaminated storm water should be discharged to the sanitary sewer. This includes, but is not limited to, vehicle steam cleaning wastewater, equipment wash wastewater, etc. Metro's Industrial Waste Section can pro- vide information on the pre-treatment requirements. 2. All floor drains inside the vehicle repair shop shall go to pre-treatment. Discharge from the oil/water separator shall then go to the sanitary sewer. 3. No contaminated water shall be discharged to existing dry wells. 4. Catchbasins in areas subject to truck fueling and pos- sible spillage should be "type-2" catchbasins with turndown elbows. 5. Any spraying done for dust generated during construction should be done with water or a solution approved by the De- partment of Ecology (see attachment). It is the Department's position that no waste oil be utilized for dust control. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Gail Colburn of the Northwest Regional Office at (206) 867-7058. Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section Attachments cc: Marlene Wylie, NWRO CHRISTINE 0. GREGOIRE Director STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ,klail Stop pV-11 • Olympia. Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 July 1, 1988 TO: Program and Regional Managers i FROM: i •\Chris Gregoire SUBJECT:' Used Oil Recycling Policy The attached policy has been developed to promote a consistent agency stand on used oil recycling and to recommend against used oil for dust suppression. This policy was developed in cooperation with the regional offices, solid and hazardous waste, air quality, and water quality programs. It is consistent with the 17 other states which have either bans or restrictions on used oil as a dust suppressant. In order to encourage recycling, used oil is not listed as hazardous waste by EPA or Ecology. But used oil typically contains high levels of heavy metals (especially lead and zinc) and can contain carcinogenic contaminants or PCBs. EPA currently claims no jurisdiction over used oil for dust suppression unless it is contaminated with hazardous waste. However, EPA does not require testing to determine hazardous waste content. With regard to concerns of the agricultural community, RCW 70.95.240 basically exempts people who accumulate their own solid waste from their own activities and apply it to their own land. This year has been shaping up to be the third drought year in a row. We are going to need consistent agency guidance in place this summer to he able to deal with used oil for dust control. '['his policy, along with the dust suppression alternatives which accompany it, will provide the necessary consistent guidance. Attachment cc: Rhonda Hunter c-�a�l 3 state of W ashir gto �n 1 k'I kill I I ICI11 (A t -mk )gy 0-1� POLICY TITLE: Used Oil Recycling Policy No. Recycling 1 Page 1 of 2 Eff. Date _ Director Appr. PURPOSE: To coordinate agency response to encourage used oil recycling instead of land disposal. Further to restrict the use of used oil for dust suppression since used oil often contains heavy metals and toxic contaminants. In Chapter 19.114 RCW, the Legislature has recognized that millions of gallons of used oil are generated each year in this state and that its improper disposal has an adverse effect upon the economy and the environment. Improper disposal of used oil is a significant source of water pollution, has a detrimental impact on the fisheries industry, and contributes toward the overall shortage of energy resources. In light of these harmful consequences, the Legislature declared that it is the policy of this state to collect and recycle used oil. The recycling of used oil required in Chapter 19.114 RCW will be taken into consideration when administering other laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, Chapter 173-303 WAC and Chapter 90.48 RCW. Under Chapter 90.48 RCW, it is unlawful for oil to enter the ground waters or surface waters of the state. According to an EPA study, roughly 99 percent of the oil applied to road surfaces leaves the road mostly in rain water runoff or by adhesion to windblown fugitive dust. Used oil carries its load of lead and heavy metals into the environment. POLICY: It is the policy of this agency to encourage and foster the collection and recycling of used oil statewide. Furthermore, this agency recommends against the application of used oil as a road oil or dust suppressant due to potential environmental contamination. DEFINITIONS: (1) "Used Oil" means any oil that has been refined from crude oil, used, and, as a result of such use, is contaminated by physical or chemical impurities as defined by the hazardous waste regulations for Washington State WAC 173-303-515. (2) "Recycle" means to prepare used oil for reuse as a petroleum product by refining, re -refining, reclaiming, reprocessing, or other means or to use used oil as a substitute for a petroleum product made from new oil, provided that the preparation or use is operationally safe, environmentally sound, and complies with all laws and rules. Policy 20. gpry1z �l iQ Page --of � (3) "Used oil dust suppressant" means any unre-refined used oil applied to reduce fugitive dust from road surfaces or any other land surface. PROCEDURES: RH167B4 Agency response to inquiries on appropriate use of used oil will encourage used oil recycling and will recommend against the use of used oil for road oiling or dust suppression. Printed on Recycled Paper The Problem Dust is more than just a nuisance on unpaved roads: ■ By obscuring the vision of drivers, dust clouds arc a traffic hazard. ■ Dust can carry several hundred feet, penetrating nearby homes and covering crops. Crop growth is stunted due to the shading effect and clogged plant pores. ■ In human health, dust is a common cause of allergies and hay fever and may be a conveyor of diseases. ■ Fine abrasive particles greatly increase wear on moving parts of a vehicle. ■ The loss of road binder, in the form of dust, represents a significant material and economic loss. The severity of a dust problem is determined primarily by the amount of speed of traffic on the unpaved road. The condition is aggravated by long dry spells, softer road aggregates that abrade under traffic to produce more dust, and initially excessive soil binder in the surface mix. Without binder material and adequate moisture, the coarser material will be thrown or washed away from the road surface. The road begins to ravel, rut, and washboard; deterioration accelerates until costly repairs are needed. The Solution Dust control using chemical or mechanical suppressants can be justified when: ■ paving is not feasible for lack of funds or limited use of the road, the cost of materials and application is low, ■ stage construction of the road is planned. The problem of dust from unpaved roads is a worldwide problem. Methods of treatment in the United States range from spraying roads with chemicals, chiefly chloride compounds and resinous adhesives, to utilizing geotextiles in road reconstruction. When chemicals are applied to the road surface to control dust: ■ the surface should first be crowned and shaped to final grade, to assure good drainage, ■ for all but resinous adhesives, the road must be prewcttcd with water (if natural moisture is lacking), to assist chemicals in penetrating the surface, ■ a heavy rainstorm shortly after application (within 36 hours) will wash away most of the chemical, and ■ more than one treatment a year with diluted forms is generally necessary. The Choices A number of organic and inorganic chemical mixes are available for use as dust palliatives; synthetic fabrics are also available for physically containing the road materials. The chart contrasts the attributes, limitations, typical applications, and sources of materials used to suppress road dust. No ranking is implied by their order on the chart. The selection of a particular dust sup- pressant will depend not only on its performance characteristics, but also on the type and volume of traffic, roadway condition, and product cost (material, freight, and application) to achieve the desired level of dust control. These criteria will vary significantly. Some successful cost -saving measures have been reported, for example, treating only a center strip of the roadway on less - traveled roads or spot -treating on a cost -share basis with roadside residents. Calcium chloride has been used to treat unpaved road surfaces since the last century. It not only retards evaporation from the road during the heat of the day, but because of its ability to attract moisture, actually recaptures lost moisture at night or under other favorable humidity, conditions. Other chlorides are widely used in the northwest, particularly for stabilizing the surfaces of haul roads. A mix of common salt and calcium chloride cuts the material cost appreciably, while controlling dust effectively. The adhesive and waterproofing character of bituminous materials is well known, but cost is usually prohibitive unless the treatment precedes some type of asphalt paving. Lignin derivatives are natural cements that bind the dust particles, aided by associated sugars which act as hydroscopic agents; they are also excellent dispersing agents for clays, meaning reduced water penetration during wet periods. Various hybrid products are emerging (for example, a bitumen-lignin dust control agent), which pose opportunities for cooperative test projects. N a S II I N f T O N S T A T E ,�rra�rrA� �;r ar F (. () I. Operating Tips Road Dust Suppressants The material in this "operating tip" is brought to you courtesy of the Transportation Technical Assistance Office of the University of Missouri - Rolla, Mr. Charles E. Dave, Director. As with the original version, the opinions, findings, and recommendations expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, the Missouri Highway and Transportation Depart- ment, or the University of Missouri -Rolla. Any reference to product or source information is not an endorsement but is included when it is considered essential to the objectives of this report. Some minor editing of the material has been done by your Northwest T2 Center's manager. Winter 1986 Printrd on Rnr%Tt-ln,A Va.�nr References 1. A Basic Asphalt Emulsion Manual. Volume 1: Understanding and Using Emulsions, FHWA-IP-79-1, The Asphalt Institute, College Park, MD, Jan. 1980. 2. Calcium Chloride for Soil Stabilisation, H. W. Kirchner, Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI, May 1984. 3. Calcium Chloride Does More Than Control Dust. M. R. Cheeseman, Public Works, Dec. 1981. 4. Compendium 12: Surface Treatment, Transportation Research Board, Commission on Sociotechnical Systems, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1980. 5. Controlling Dust on Unpaved Roads. Dennis Lane, The Rural Transportation Fact Sheet No. 84-02, University of Kansas Transportation Center, May 1984. 6. Dust Control With Salt -Calcium., Mixtures for Unpaved Roads. Shoulders and Detours, Morton Salt Company, 1962. 7. Dust Control on Unpaved Roads. Highway Extension and Research Project for Indiana Counties, Purdue University -Engineering Experiment Station in Cooperation with The County Commissioners of Indiana, County Highways Scries-No. 1, 1960. 8. Dust --Summer Problem on Gravel Roads. Rural Technical Assistance Program Newsletter, Vol. 2, Aug. 1983. 9. Future Areas of Investigation Regarding the Problem of Urban Road Dust, Edward T. Brookman and Dennis C. Drehmel, paper presented at the Symposium on the Transfer and Utilization of Particle Control Technology, Denver, CO, July 1979. 10. Geotextiles for unpaved roads; tclecon with T. R. Blackwood, Monsanto Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, July 1985. 11. Gravel Road Dust Control. Jim Ellis, Lewis and Clark Co., Montana. 12. Handbook of Soil Stabilisation, Bros/Tema Division, American Hoise and Derrick Co., 63 South Robert Street, St. Paul, MN 55107, 1977. 13. Highwav Engineering Handbook, K. B. Woods, First Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1960. 14. Hvdroseeding Spray Curbs Dust Erosion. Better Roads, Feb. 1984. 15. Liquid Calcium Chloride Replaces Asphalt Emulsion. Tom DeJulio, Public Works, March 1984. 16. .Maintaining Gravel Road Surfaces. Transportation Information Exchange, Fact Sheet T-225, St. Michael's College, Winooski, VT 05404. 17. ,Maintaining The Vermont Backroad. Transportation Information Exchange, Fact Sheet T-205, St. Michael's College, HC-100A, Sept. 1976. 18. Materials for Stabilisation. Educatio❑ and Information Guide, American Road Builders Assoc., Stabilization Committee, HC-100A, Sept. 1976. 19. New Concepts for Control of Fugitive Particle Emissions From Unpaved Roads, T. R. Blackwood and D. c. Drehmel, paper presented at the Symposium on the Transfer and Utilization of Particle Control Technology, Denver, CO, July 1979. 20. New Roads for Old at Half the Materials Cost, Public Works, May 1984. 2I. Performance Study of Calcium -Chloride -Treated Roads. E. M. Baylard, Superintendent of Highways, Onondaga County, New York, Highway Research Board, 1955. 22. Research Notes: High Speed Gravel Roads. Vol. 2, No. 5, Alaska DOT & PF, Division of Planning - Northern Region, 2301 Peger Road, Research Section, Fairbanks, AK 99701. 23. Road Dust Control, Alva Williams, Thurston County Department of Public Works, Washington, Correspondence, June 1985. 24. Road Dust Control with Calcium Chloride. Transportation Information Exchange, Fact Sheet T-220, St. Michael's College, Winooski, VT 05404. 25. Road Surface Management for Local Governments --Six Case Studies, Louis B. Stevens, Federal Highway Administration, DOT-I-85-06, Jan. 1985. 26. Salt Stabilization, Highway Research Record No. 294, Highway Research Board, 1969. Soil .Mechanics and Soil Stabilisation, Proceedings of Eighth Annual Meeting, Highway Research Board, Part II, 1938. 28. Special Project Specification. Section 725-Lignin Sul fonate, U.S. Forest Service, Sept. 1982. 29. Special Project Specification. Section 413-Lignin Sulfonate Dust Palliative. U.S. Forest Service, July 1980. 30. Special Project Specification. Section 730-,Magnesium Chloride. March 1984. Attributes Limitations C'IIF.MICAL- Inorganic ■ Starts to absorb water from ■ Lowers freezing point of ■ Slightly corrosive to steel. air at 29 percent relative water solution to -60 degrees highly corrosive to humidity (77 F). F, minimizing frost heave aluminum and its alloys; ■ Reduces rate of evaporation (30 percent solution). Freezing of treated road not attracts moisture, thereby prolonging active period I'or 3 times (vapor pressure of only begins at lower corrosion. Z �s saturated solution at 77 temperature but is gradual ■ Rainwater tends to • \ degrees F is 7 mm Hg). Note: the lower the vapor pressure, and seldom completed. infiltrate and Icach out O� the greater the ability to ■ Treated road can be highly soluble chlorides, but r G resist evaporation. regraded and recompacted if road has proper crown. with less concern for losing most water is dcl'lcctcd ,(\ ■ Significantly increases moisture and density. sideways into ditches. `` surface tension of water \v I ilIII heIwcen partirlcs, ■ During dry periods, upward G� licllpmp• to slow cv noration and further tighten capillary action may cause chlor ides to c near compacted soil as drying road surface, wheherreeithey can progresses. be leached away by sudden rain. F ■ Starts to absorb water from ■ Lowers freezing point of ■ Moderately corrosive to steel air at 76 percent relative water solution to -6 degrees in dilute solutions, but no humidity (77 degrees F). F (25 percent solution). worse than water in - \S ■ Reduces rate of evaporation ■ When mixed into road base, concentrated solutions; thereby O� r 1.3 times (vapor pressure of effectively improves attracts moisture, prolonging active period for r, saturated solution at 77 mechanicalstability. corrosion. V dcgrccs F is 18 mm lig). ■ Costs the least of any ■ it becomes diluted or ■ Increases surface tension chloride salt. lc lay aches out, disperses lec j�\� slightly less than calcium which shrinks on drying and V 0 chloride. becomes more susceptible to blowing. ■ Combines stabilizing action ■ Same limitations as for these individually. Cr`p Off\ of sodium chloride with dust of calcium chloride. salts used rcontrol G ■ Compared to calcium �4:� `l\ chloride used alone, reduces cost 20 percent while losing Q G\ less than 5 percent in dust G control. ■ Starts to absorb water from ■ Lowers freezing point of ■ In concentrated solutions. air at 32 percent relative water solution to -27 degrees very corrosive to steel. humidity (77 degrees F). F (22 percent solution). attracts moisture, thereby Freezing of treated road not prolonging active period of ■ Reduces rate of evaporation only begins at lower corrosion. (Note: corrosive \i \ 3.1 times (vapor pressure off l '• t t temperature but is gradual action of scawarer on steel �(O �� <:rturated Nolution at 77 and seldom completed. tttributed to \1g('12 degrees I is 7.h mnt llg). content.) Some products N\ 0 Morc effective than calcium ff ■ Treated road can be rc radcd and rccompactcd g may contain a corrosion- inhibiting additive. r chloride solutions for with less concern for losing increasing surface tension, moisture and density. resulting in a very hard road burl ace. Road Dust Suppressants Applications Sources ■ No cementing action; Typically 2 treatments; year: By-product brine from manufacture of sodium carbonate by amonia-soda process and of bromine effective control only with well -graded, stable road Initial: from natural brines. mixes. Flake 1.0 to 1.5 lb./sq. yd. Three forms: Pellet 0:8 to 1.3 Ib./sq. yd. ■ Exothermic: releases heat as 35% soln 0.2 to 0.3 gal./sq. yd. Flake, or Type I: it dissolves, enough to be a (77 to 80%cone, 1000 bags) safety hazard to workers Followup: Pellet, or Type II: mixing the dry form in 1/2 to 2/3 initial dosage (94 to 97% cone, 800 bags) water. Clear liquid ■ Spills of concentrate may Can be stored in buildings, hoppers, silos, or (32/35/38%cone. tankers) kill or burn vegetation; covered piles. Must be airtight and protected from reasonable care in handling wet, humid conditions. Storage floor at ground Some brand names: required. Icvcl should be paved asphalt or treated concrete. LIQUIDOW ■ Should not be spread over Gravity feed systems required 45 degrees for DOW FLAKE bridge decks; spills must be flakes to flow, 35 degrees for pellets. PELADOW cleaned quickly to prevent Spread by tank trucks with pressure distributors SUPERFLAKE slick spots. and spinner disk or positive -displacement units. Rcfcrcnccs 2, 3, 4, 13, 24, 26, 27 ■ If overapplied, poses threat Generally higher dosages than calcium chloride Occurs naturally as rock salt (mined mechanically to plant and animal life as treatment. or hydraulically) and brines (refined or well as possible groundwater evaporated). contamination. Some brand names: ■ Not an effective MORTON SALT dustproofcr; thus typically DIAMONDSALT used to stabilize road base and topped with calcium References 3, 7, 13 chloride to control dust. Typically 2 treatments/year: Salts mixed before applying: equal parts by weight of CC -grade rock or evaporated salt with Initial: flake calcium chloride (if pellet, use 1000 I lb. mix/sq. yd. salt/800 pellet). Not available premixed. Followup: 1/2 initial dosage References ■ Rainwater tends to Typically 2 treatments/year: Occurs naturally as brine (evaporated); also infiltrate and leach out byproduct of potash production. highly soluble chlorides, but Initial: Usually liquid form, 25 to 35 percent solution. if road has proper crown, 30% soln 0.5 gal./sq. yd. most water is deflected Some brand names: sideways into ditches. Followup: DUSTGARD ■ During dry periods, upward 1/2 initial dosage DUS-TOP capillary action may cause chlorides to crystallize near References 11, 13, 30, 34 road surface, where they can Storage and handling same as for liquid calcium be leached away by sudden chloride. rain. Applied preferably with pressure spray bars (splash bars produce uneven applications). CHEMICAL -Organic OJ� N .J �A �cl Qa MECHANICAL GC� a�o �0 Attributes ■ Poses no threat to the environment. ■ Normally, readily available. ■ Binds soils because of asphalt's adhesive proper - tics. ■ Serves to waterproof road. ■ May be adapted to suit wide range of soils, gravels, and traffic conditions. ■ Greatly increases dry strength of soil; under dry conditions, outperforms bituminous binders. ■ During rain, disperses clay which in turn swells and plugs pores, reducing water penetration. ■ Tends to remain slightly plastic, permitting reshaping and additional traffic compaction. ■ With addition of calcium carbonate slurry to counteract corrosive effects, solubility is reduced, thereby prolonging dust - laying capability. ■ Flexible, durable, water permeable, and highly resistant to soil chemicals. ■ Used as a separator, prevents intermixing of subgrade material and base course, thereby preserving drainage systems and load transfer capability. Structural section life is prolonged and maintenance costs reduced. ■ By preventing subgrade fines from "pumping" up into the aggregate, serves to control dust production. ■ Ammonium -base sulfides are superior to sugar -free calcium -base sulfides for aggregate binding. ■ Material cost comparable to that of inorganic chemicals. ■ In tension, reduces localized loads over a larger area of subgrade, thereby improving the support properties of the system. ■ Can reduce the amount of aggregate required in the initial design of unpaved structural sections. ■ If buried, can be expected to function indefinitely. Limitations ■ Evaporates readily, controlling dust generally for less than a day. ■ Under dry conditions, some may not maintain resilience; can form a crust and fragment under traIT ic loads. ■ Waste oil subject to state regulations for handling and disposing of hazardous substances. ■ Control depends on well - graded soil -aggregate mix, loosened to a depth of I to inches just prior to initial application; wearing surface silt and clay content needs to be 4 to 8 percent. ■ May cause corrosion of aluminum and its alloys. ■ Surface binding action may be reduced or completely destroyed by heavy rain, owing to solubility of solids content in water. ■ Becomes slippery when wet, brittle when dry. ■ High material cost, though installation cost is low. ■ Material degradation may result from exposure to ultraviolet rays (sunlight). Road,Dust Suppressants Applications Sources ■ Costs more than other Frequency of treatments depends on temperature Rcl crenccs 3, 4, 5 inorganic chemical and humidity. suppressants because of repeated applications needed to achieve same level of control (labor intensive). ■ Material cost significantly Generally I to 2 treatments/year: Tars (residues from coal) and bitumens (residues higher than for other 0.1 to 1 gal./sq. yd. depending on road surface from crude oil) combined with lighter fractions of chemical suppressants. condition and dilution distillate, wide range of viscosities. Liquid asphalt: Grade SC-70 ■ Washington State Department Material sprayed using many types of equipment, of Ecology recommends against from hand-held hoses to asphalt distributors. Bituminous emulsions: Grade SS-1, SS-th, CSS-1, used oil as a dust suppressant. or CSS-1 h mixes with 5+ parts water by volume References I, 3, 4, 7, 12, 16, 17, 33 Generally 1 to 2 treatments/year. Water liquor of papermaking industry; contains lignin and carbohydrates in solution (lignin is 10 to 25% soln 0.5 to 1.0 gal./sq. yd. natural cement that binds fibers of woods). Powder 1.0 to 2.0 lb./sq. yd. Composition depends on raw materials (mainly wood pulp) and chemicals used to extract cellulose; active constituent is neutralized lignin Application methods same as for chlorides. sulphonic acid containing sugar. Common names: sulfite liquor, black or green liquor, sulfite lye, ammonium lignin sulfonate, calcium Iignosulfonate Some brand names: LIGNOSOL NORLIG RAY BINDER References 3, 4, 5, 16, 23, 25, 29, 30, 33, 35 Placed during road construction; no special Manufactured from manmade fibers, typically equipment required. polypropylene, mechanically interlocked by ncedlepunching and heat bonding. Available in various weights and widths, by the roll. Some brand names: SUPAC MIRAFI TYPAR TREVIRA References 10, 19 31. Stabilizing Road Soils. Transportation Information Exchange, Fact Sheet T-415, St. Michael's College, Winooski, VT 05404. 32. Stabilizing Soil for Road Construction. Thomas J. McLean, P.E., and L. A. Maciula, P.E., OSU Extension Facts D-1019. 33. Use of Laboratory Methods to Quantify Dust Suppressant Effectiveness. D. C. Lane. T. E. Baxter. T. Cuscino. and C. Cowherd Jr.. Transactions. Society of Mining Engineers of ,DIME. Vol. 274. p. 2001 to 2004. 1984. 34. Use of Magnesium Chloride for Dust Treatment and Soil Stabilization of Forest Service Roads. Gcne Hansen, USFS Report. 35. Utili--ation of an Industrial By -Product in Highway Construction, C. H. Huckclbcrry, Pima County Highway Dept., AZ, 1984. Reprinted by 'N;SHING10N S I A I E Published by Northwest Technology Transfer Center Washington State Department of Transportation Transportation Building KF-01 Olympia, Washington 98504 (206) 753-3811/SCAN 234-3811 In cooperation with Amok W w6putwr stag ., D"mwbnwd of ThwNportadon Q US Department of Trclnsponahon Fedord H4hway Adrnintstratlon aoo noo 4uf 30 /"? 15) e C4a,-(-4Sf i� A�E7 Y0 ,?/GK C�1''"�C�l-1 TIZANe- F S�C1 Gh.4-t- 12. e-"A ` d i'�'lzvr "ea A Ci 7� 07' � (rec cat VIA ?h-c J-e 1161ev ro v F J�trG Z)eyl f- T/E S C44 PRAI� I 1AVC )eenlo, �So4� Y L to-k- 0-1 I . 11 Z3S - z 6 3 i 7--7 -Z-9y8 6- 'Z --CO63-,3 c 35 - 2 C.xl;2- 27-7— /?9S- 1"7 2 "C) 6122-6767 .25a "Z3S —Zv s i E&H PROPERTIES 9 /6 George B. Boyd 827 108th N I Bellevue, Wash 98004 206/454-5959 ooa �Ge� ��-e�-�- p4e.' V - � //o /0 rol�&.- a.jo,�, y *=E=� . -- 5 5 A. Sul . 7A- rat }im, 0 �� �tu� •-- tv � /� qGT 5��'�ed -Bala." /,mot �� �¢.�� cy ✓�,� � c. /.� s 4 c, c� 5 S cCt a/` T "S �pS T 771"�/120- 'M/ GG "' oao z3s-z63" 5 ?7©-S3S ` 2 --r �-.Z62 O 2-7?- /795 6,2Z-6?6-7 A --'SD 9: +0. 000 Z i4j�-,eZje ,fib Yd fior-e c�s�` ke pt t .ki b �p f 03 S - 2 63 Z3� -z(::� 31 5 77-:2c?OrO S 6S2 --&6 33 2 3.�262 0 3�j -�'y� 277- /795- Cv2Z-�?67 23S-ZG 3 &y Earl Clymer, Mayor CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 22, 1988 TO: Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer John Adamson, Valley Coordinator Donald Monaghan, Design Engineer John Morris, Block Grant Coordinator Glenn Gordon, Fire Marshall Jerry Lind, Land Use Inspector Richard Stoddard, Police Sergeant Ron Olson, Utility Engineer Jim Hanson, Assistant Bldg. Official FROM: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: PLEASE NOTE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIREDI E & H It Properties; Park Plaza Building, Garden Plaza Building Mitigation Compliance City Council has requested that a report be prepared for their consideration Monday, September 26th, regarding E & H's compliance with all environmental, land use and building mitigation or compliance conditions. Please review the attached matrix of conditions and check off those that you feel have been adequately complied with which your department has knowledge of or jurisdiction over. A meeting has been scheduled for 1:30 PM tomorrow in the 3rd floor conference room to discuss these conditions and whether a temporary occupancy permit should be granted. Your input will provide staff with the necessary information to prepare their report to Council by Monday afternoon. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. DE: mjp .r A 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - !206)2"5-2552 -den ',Park :Council Specific Requirements :Impacted ;Begin Anticipated :Completion US :Plaza coon :Parties :Construction:CDmpletion Required : :ERC : 1 - -. : Date _....____ ; . ; 0 :1. There shall be formed a joint City/Citizen Committee concerning ;Policy Dev ; : traffic diversion from the single family residences of North Renton (Traffic Engr; JULY 18 1 OCCUPANCY ! ;shall be all streets in North Renton, except for North 3rd, North 4th :Fire and I I ;and Park Avenue N. The purpose of this effort will be to arrive at a :Police _ 1— : :joint staff -neighborhood recommendation to the City Council as to the :traffic diversion steps that would be the most effective to preserve :this single family neighborhood. If a single recommendation cannot be : : : :obtained, then a report should lz-5ybaitted to the Council detailing :the two or three best methods with the Council making the final :decision. This recommendation shall be made by July 11 1988. :See Map Attached to Ord. 14098 for area. — : 0 :2. On Park Avenue N. there should be no parking during peak traffic :Traffic Engr:- : :hours. This will permit four lanes of traffic, two northbound, two :Signing to : JAN 11,18 : OCCUPANCY :COMPLETED :southbound. ;begin after : ; ' :Jan. llth , ----- ------------------ : : 0 :3. Install a 'C' curb on Park Ave. from the north property line :EiH Coord.- : : :of Park Plaza through the intersection of North 5th prohibiting :with Traffic:SUMMER/FALL : OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY : :left turns on Park Ave. North. Left turns would also be prohibited at : : 1900 : ; , : :North 6th. The developer shall also provide an additional 10' of : : : :right-of-way along the west property line from North 6th to North 5th :for potential future widening of Park Avenue North to 5 lanes. :in the event widening is required by the North Renton Arterial Study :the applicant has given the City an easement for roadway and utility :purposes over the Nest 10 feet of Block 11 Renton Fars Plat. 0 :4. There shall be designed a turn movement southbound on Park Ave :Traffic : COMPLETE 1 : : :N. at N. 3rd to minimize conflicts in the left turning movement onto N :Engineering : DESIGN :3rd and the developer shall pay for any change in the signal at that I :JULY 5, 19B8: OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY : 'location. This requirement is understood and will be enacted; however, :it could cause other problems and we may have to come back to Council. ' : 2 : 2 : 0 :5. Garden Avenue N, northbound shall have no through traffic to Lake :Design : COMPLETE I :Washington Boulevard. The intent is to discourage regional traffic from :Requirement : DESIGN I lcrossing the Garden/Park/Lake Washington Boulevard intersection and : :JULY 5, 1989: OCCUPANCY ;OCCUPANCY : :proceeding down Lake Washington Blvd. We understand this to be a full :time restriction. ' : : : : : 0 : :6. North loth shall not he built at this time. ; : N/A : MIA ;NIA : I PROPERTIES Page 2 ?n :Park :Council '.Specific Requirements :Impacted !Begin Anticipated .'Completion a Plaza Action I •-�._ :Parties :Construction:Completion : Required ! _ :ERC : : __.._� 1 Bate : l 2 : 2 : 0 :7. Fund the North Renton Arterial Study to evaluate alternative 20-year : 1 FEB'88 1 MARCH '98 !JULY 15 : 1 :development land use scenarios far the impact on the transportation system.:City to , : :The study should place as such emphasis on neighborhood mitigation as it :administer 1 :does on traffic mitigation. 0 :8. Bond f1,039,700 (1177 per trip) to fund transportation improvements :E4H 1 BUILDING : OCCUPANCY : 1 1 : !recommended from the North Renton Arterial Plan to be adopted by Council 1 : PERMIT 1 1 : , :Payment due at time of building permit. O :9. Reconstruct the intersection oL Lake Washington Blvd./Park/Garden :EkH : DESIGN : :to provide an additional eastbound lane an Park Drive from W. 10th : : COMPLETE 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY :to Barden Ave. N. : :JULY 5, 1908: 1 1 ! O :10. Realign Garden Ave. North at North 8th to remove the existing dog leg.:ELM 1 JULY '20 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY 1 , '--1-------' :Developer working with Pic -Car to acquire A/W. �--- ------ - --1 � --- — 5 : ! O :11. Rechannelize !forth 5th Street from Garden Ave. North to Park Ave. 0H 1 JULY '88 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY 1 1 : :North to 3 lanes to provide left turn lane. 1 OCT 188 OR I ! 3 : 3 : 0 :12. Signali:e the intersection of North bth and Garden Ave.-M.- "'- -- :EkH '- I JULY '88 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY : 0 :13. Provide passenger drop off lanes on Park Avenue North -and North &th --1ELH — - " : FEB '09 "'I OCCUPANCY -.'OCCUPANCY — :- 1 1 :Street in front of the Park Plaza and Garden Plaza Buildings. 1 ! 1 1 ! 0 :14. Implementation of as many of these conditions as possible shall occur : C1TY/ELH 1 NOMTHLY : OCCUPANCY !MIA 1 : 1 :immediately. Routine progress reports to Council will be provided. 1115. I 1 1 ! 4 ! 4 : :That the applicant provide five lanes on Park Ave. N. between M. Sth Street: 1 NOT DONE/ : ISEE 1 :and M. bth St. with appropriate taper sections. NOTE: If the proposed : - :COND. 3 1NST:N/A ICONOITION 1 :Park/Garden Couplet is adopted prior to the issuance of the building permit: 1 1 !No. 3 : ! : '.for this project, this provision may be relaxed by the Public Works Directol I 1 1 ! ! : :If this improvement is required no credit will be allowed against the North, :Renton Benefit Assessment fee --for this item. Installation of 'C' cerb on 1 1 :Park (Council Action 13) supersedes this requirement. 1 ! 1 ! 1 I irden :Park !Council :Specific Requirements :Impacted !Begin :Anticipated !Completion ; laza ;Plaza :Action ! !Parties !ConstructionlCompletion Required ! 2C :ERC ! ! ! _ ! ! Date , , 6 ! ! :That all overhead electrical and communication distribution lines on ! ! :Park Avenue North between North 5th Street and North 6th Street; North ! ! :6th between Park Avenue North and Garden Avenue North; and North 5th 1 , ,between Park Avenue North and Garden Avenue North be underground ed.- !--CITY , ,IULY 80 '. OCCUPANCY '.00CUPANCY '. ! !NOTE: The applicant shall furnish the City copies of agreements with ! ! ! ! ! ! : :the affected utilities regarding this work. Also, the applicant will ! ! ;not be allowed credit for thit-wer-kagainst the North Renton Benefit ! ! :Assessment Fee. ' :17. 1 1 1 , 7 i 5 ! :That the applicant agrees to reconstruct the existing signal at the 0H :intersection of North 6th Avenue and North Park Avenue. ! i ASAP i OCCUPANCY !OCCUPANCY ; ! ! :NOTE: No credit will be allowed later on against the North Renton , :Benefit Assessment fee for this item. : :18. : : DESIGN : 8 : :That the applicant pay their fair share of the cost of signalizing :EkH ;JULY 15, '88:UNDETERMINED:OCCUPANCY ! :the east and west legs of the Garden Avenue North and North 8th ! ! !Street intersection. : ! :NOTE: The applicant will be given credit for off -site improvements ! ! ! ! ! :identified in the North Renton Traffic Analysis Study. , 1 4 : : :That the applicant dedicate ten feet of R/W on N. 6th St. between Garden :E&H ! ASAP ! OCCUPANCY_ :N/A ! : ! :Ave. N. and Park Ave. N. for future widening of N. 6th to' -five lanes. -Sint: _ :widening will occur an the North side in order to line up with the West sid: !side 10 feet will be required an the North side. E4H will pay if the City : i i i ! ! :will condemn. , : :20. 10 1 10 : :That all driveways have a minimum width of 30 feet to enable smoother :EiH :ingress and egress traffic movements between the public right -of -ray ! ! ASAP ! OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY ; i ! ;and private property. ------ -------------- 1 1 --------------------------------------------- 1 12 ! i !That the applicant provide street lighting to City standards on North :E&H : : 16th Street between Park and Garden Avenues North; an Park Avenue ! ! :North from North 5th Street to North 6th Street; and on North 5th ! 1 SEPT '88 : OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY ! :Street from Park to Garden Avenues North. ' , 13 : ! :That all sails to be removed from the site be first tested for :E11H :possible hazardous compounds contamination by a ceFtified professional : I MARCH 188 ! OCCUPANCY :COMPLETE ; ! ! land if found to test positive in this regard, thot.. a disposal plan he ! ! !developed that is acceptable to both the Departrert of Public Works ! : ' :and King County Health Department. 1 ' i , Fen !Park !Council !Specific Requirements :Empacted !Begin ;Anticipated :Completion 1 [a .Plaza Action . :Parties :Construction:Completion 1 Required 1 :ERC . '. _. . Date ! 1 ___z__,__a____- ,________a,S 3zzzzzaaaazaaa==-zazz az_=z=zzzazaaa a:z_xzzzzazz azzeaaaasazaazzz=zaa:axa:x;zazesuxaaaa;sazasax:asxa=axazaxaxsaaa;a:zzaaaz=aaai 14 . l :That all contaminated soils, if found, be removed or sealed to the IEkH 1 MARCH '88 1 OCCUPANCY !COMPLETE : :satisfaction of the King County Health Department. l5 ! 1 .That approved haul routes and a program for ensuring the - :EkH ---- ! MARCH '98 "1 OCCUPANCY !OCCUPANCY - :cleanliness of hauling vehicles before they enter City streets be 'be developed that is acceptable to the Department of Public Works. -' - :25. ' 16 . 15 . .That the applicant provide a Traffic Systems Management Program :EkH :with the -aid of Metro with the aim of reducing total vehicular trips '. '"' -" - : :on site by a minimum of ten (10) percent. AUGUST 'B8 ! OCCUPANCY .00CUPANCY 1 1 . :NOTE: If vehicle trips are reduced by 20 percent, the applicant's 1 '.$9.00 per trip traffic management assessment fee will be returned ! ' : 1 :credited to them. 17 : ! .That the first floor of the parking garage at Part Plaza (if it is used for:EkH ! . :for Garden Plaza) be reserved so as to facilitate its easy use by workers : 1 ASAP l OCCUPANCY '.00CUPANCY 1 : ! :in Garden Plaza. The applicant is encouraged to provide a covered pedestri! ! 1 :connector between this garage and the proposed office building. The coverel :walkway is to be encouraged only if it does not impede safe movement of '"—i--`" '-1 ! 1 1' : 1 :pedestrians and vehicles along the route to the south of parking facility. 1 ! 1 ! ! 127. :That the applicant provide bicycle storage facilities at grade at the :EkH ! ASAP 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY 1 :back of the proposed office building as well as at street level in the ! 1 l 1 1 V __ .._..1 :garage facility. :NOTE: An enclosed lockable storage facility for a minimum of 15 1 :bicycles shall be provided in the parking garage. —' 18 :. 17 ! :That the applicant provide recreational amenities an this or the Park :EkH - — I ASAP '. OCCUPANCY '.00CUPANCY - 1 :Plaza site to the satisfaction of the Parks Department for employee use 1 1 :including a recreational court or similar facility, and changing or :shower rooms. :That the applicant work with the Renton Fire Department and the " -- 1EkH 1 ; :owners of the property to the east (across Garden Ave.)to develop !Fire Dept. . ASAP '. OCCUPANCY !OCCUPANCY 1 :an acceptable mitigation plan for preventing an explosion or major ! :leak of gas from the two 15,000 gallon liquid propane tanks located -. . 1 :NOTE: The costs of mitigation should be barn by the applicant 1 ! :as veil as the applicant for the proposed offlut Cripple[ to the north. ! ! -'-------- arden :Part- :Council :Specific Requirements :Impacted :Begin :Anticipated !Completion ; lata :Plata :Action 1 :Parties :Construction:Completion ; Required : RC.. :ERC ; ; 1 : Date _-- 20 ; 20 ; !That if the applicant chooses to use reflective glass to lessen solar IEkH I ASAP ; OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY ; ; :heat gain within the building, that it be located as an interior pane I 1 :of double or triple paned glazing. I 1 1 1 1 1 : :NOTE: By locating mirrored finishes behind tinted exterior glazing ; 1 :the effects of visible glare can be significantly reduced without :requiring the shielding of the glare effects of such glazing. I 1 1 ---------------------- ------- --------------- -------- 21 ; 21 ; :That the applicant provide employee lunch room facilities sufficient :EkH 1 ASAP 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY :to meet the needs of employees on site. In addition, the applicant I :is encouraged to provide exterior eating and relaxation areas where 1i :employees can get away from the inside environment when the outdoor : :weather is conducive to such activity. I :32. 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 22 : : Mat the applicant work with the Police Department on appropriate :EiH : ASAP : OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY : 1 1 :security measures for the parking garage. 1 :Police Dept.: ; I 1 1 I 1 1 : 1 1 : 1 23 : 25 : :chat at grade, surface parking currently serving the 500 Park :EiH I ASAP 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY : :Building be cnnsalidated into the new parking garage and these areas I 1 1 I 1 1 be appropriately landscaped. 1 r I 1 1 :NOTE: The E.R.C. said they would encourage the applicant to go 1 1 1 1 :another half story with the proposed new garage to facilitate these : :conditions if the addition met the height setback requirements of :the B-1 tone. : 1 : 1 1 1 I :34 I I I 1 7 : 5 ; :That the applicant participate to a maximum amount of $20,000 in :ELH :NOT REDUIREO:NOT REQUIREDIOCCUPARCY : 1 :the rebuilding of the traffic signal at North bth Avenue and Part. I :APPLICANT IS: : :INSTALLING 1 ; : I :NOTE: No credit will be allowed later on against the North Renton :C-CURB 031 :Benefit Assessment fee for this item. 1 1 1 1 1 :35. 1 1 1 b ; b : :That all overhead electrical and communication distribution lines on :Review :DULY '88 ; OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY : : :Park Avenue North between North bth Street and the applicant's north ! :property line be undergrounded. 1 1 :NOTE: The applicant shall furnish the City copies of agreements with ;the affected utilities regarding this work. Also, the applicant will !not be allowed credit for this work against the North Renton Benefit : : :Assessment fee. 1 1 1 1 en Park :Council !Specific Requirements :Impacted (Begin (Anticipated :Completion ; a :Plaza :Action ! :Parties :Construction:Completion 1 Required . ERC _ . : ! i Date ! : 7 : :That the applicant agree to realign the existing signal at the IEkH :NOT REQUIREDINOT REQUIRED:OCCUPANCY ; ! :intersection of North 8th Avenue and North Park Avenue. (If widening : :APPLICANT IS! : ! :of Park takes place.) : :INSTALLING 1 :C-CURB (13) ! 1 : ! I !NOTE: No credit will be allowed later on against the North Renton ! 1 I 1 I !Benefit Assessment fee for this item. ' 1 9 ! !That the applicant undertake a traffic impact analysis of 'ELK 1 ASAP ! OCCUPANCY (OCCUPANCY ! ! i :their proposal parking structure and adjacent parking lot ! ! . :driveways to consider signal warrants at the various access locations.- ! 12 : :That the applicant's proposed skybridge across Park Avenue North :EM 1 ASAP 1 OCCUPANCY ;OCCUPANCY 1 : I :be at least 23 feet high over the highest point of the roadway ! I !so as not to impact traffic movement of larger vehicles and ! ! ! ! ! 1 : construction equipment on the street. ! 13 ! :That the applicant provide a stronger pedestrian orientation at - -'' :EkH 1 ASAP I OCCUPANCY (OCCUPANCY : I : :the front of the building along North Park Avenue by deleting :parking here and creating possibly a mini -plaza at street level. ! 14 ! !That the applicant provide for an eventual, clearly delineated, IE4H :TRNSPO STUDY! OCCUPANCY :ONLY IF I " :pedestrian crosswalk from the front of the proposed building to the —l—T -- ` ' :WARRANTS 70 ; -:S1UOY 5NOM5 : ! ; !parking garage across Park Avenue. Said crossing should be well 1 ITRAF.ENG. I !WARRANTS ! ! ; !illuminated at night and include a flashing yellow light visible for a I :ASAP I I I :minimum of 200 feet in both directions of travel until such time that- : ; :a signalized pedestrian crossing is provided. ' __.....' _'... :NOTE: Warrants for this crossing should be provided by the :applicant at the earliest possible date. ---------- --------- ----------- 16 ! :That the applicant provide landscaping at street level and soften the IEkH : ASAP 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY ! :appearance of the proposed seven -story office building. ' 42. : 19 : :That a minimum eight foot wide, preferably covered, pedestrian :E1H ! ASAP : OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY I :linkage be provided between the proposed parking garage, and the Garden—! I ! :Plaza Building which it will also serve. :NOTE: This iter could be a shared item between this project and ---"- . I : :the proposed Garden Plaza project which it is intended to primarily : ! :serve. H. PROPERTIES Page 1 den ;Park :Council ;Specific Requirements ;Impacted ;Begin :Anticipated (Completion ; za :Plaza ;Action ; ;Parties :Construction:Completion I Required I :ERC ; : : : : Date : : .zxaxx� r_z—_r_r_x'---cr_xcc'------zxvor_e_ocaoocx----oaceeaa r_xxx x_oazszexaxeavzaxzaaxzxa saazaasaazalsaznxr_aaaa��asasaasfxasslaaasaxa:aaxalxasaeauzaza� 22 ; ;That the applicant visually soften the Park Avenue North and garden :EQH I ASAP OCCUPANCY IOCCUPANCY : I ; ;Avenue North facade of the parking garage with drip irrigated plants I 1 : :of sufficient durability and scale as to create a landscape screen I :of evergreen foliage. : :NOTE: Since garages are not the same as parking lots, it is difficult I I I Ito provide the minimum 5 percent landscaping called for in Section I 1 1 I I : : ;4-2204(6)(B)131. Exterior landscaping should, however, be used to :soften the impacts of such structures whenever possible. : :44. , I : 23 : :That the applicant set the proposed parking garage back a minimum IEAH 1 ASAP 1 OCCUPANCY :OCCUPANCY : :of 10 feet from the southern prop4rty line to ensure reasonable :light and air to future development on the site to the south of the I I I : :garage. I ' ---- --------------------------- ------ : :45. I 24 1 ;That the applicant landscape the 6A foot setback along the south side IELH I ASAP I OCCUPANCY IOCCU►ANCY 1 :of the parking garage with evergreen plant material to the satisfaction : :of the City's landscape architect. ----------------------- —-------- —---- —---- ----------' ----------' -----------' ----------' -----------' :46. 25 : :That the applicant provide decorative sidewalks to the satisfaction of :EkH : ASAP I OCCUPANCY 63CCI:7ANCY : :the City's landscape architect and the Department of Public Works. : I 0. Ser#te,,Ti f 2. 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Page 259 The matter should also be referred to the City Attorney for research of the record, input and a legal analysis. (See report below.) MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COU14CIL ADOPT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE REPORT. CARRIED. Fire: Firefig:.�s:s Councilman Stredicke commended Fire Department union personnel for Commended for Waiving volunteering to waive requirements of their contract which calls for time and Overtime one-half pay for overtime and agreeing to be compensated on straight time basis for overtime worked during the remainder of the year. Administrative Assistant Parness indicated that this is an unusual example of cooperation and exemplifies the type of support the Firefighters union has given the City. Public Safety Committee Public Safety Committee Chairman Trimm presented a report recommending Police: Obstructing Council concur in the request of the Police Department to adopt a city Officer ordinance related to obstructing a police officer. The Committee further requested that this matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for preparation of the proper legislation. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a report Committee recommending that the Cooperative Planning Area Agreement between Annexation: Soos Creek Renton and King County for the Soos Creek Community Planning Area be Planning Area Agreement referred to the full Council for public hearing. MOVED BY REED, with King County SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Housing Authority: Senior Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented a recommendation Citizen Housing Bond regarding the proposed bond issue for senior housing: Issue 1. The City Council should support the request from the Housing Authority to place the issue on the general election ballot (November 8, 1988). 2. The proposal should include a commitment to provide 72 or more units of additional housing to Renton's elderly residents at a cost of $5.5 million. 3. Rather than proposing a specific site for the development prior to the election, the City and Housing Authority should jointly identify a site after a thorough public process and will review alternatives after bonds are approved. 4. The City administration and Housing Authority should negotiate a cooperative agreement that will identify the respective role and responsibilities of the two entities with respect to this project. 5. The cooperative agreement and the ordinance placing the issue before the voters should be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for review and presentation for Council action. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later ordinance.) Transportation (Aviation) Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report concurring in Committee the staff recommendation to accept the Renton Airport Master Plan, Phase 11, Airport: Master Plan, with advisory committee changes and set public hearing for October 3, 1988. Phase II MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report recommending Committee that no changes be made in the parking restrictions within the downtown area Citizen Comment: Woods (referred 11/2/87). MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, - Parking Ticket COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Rezone: E & H Transportation Committee Chairman Nelson presented a report regarding the Properties, R-016-87 extent to which E & H Developments was to be given credit for regional traffic improvements against its $1.1 million bond and the extent to which the neighborhood mitigation program had to be installed before occupancy of the buildings. The City Attorney prepared a letter to the Council addressing these two questions. He concluded that credit for six improvements should be given against the $1.1 million bond to the extent they are identified as regional traffic improvements from the study being prepared and then adopted by the City Council. The study evaluates alternative twenty-year development land use scenarios for the impact on the transportation system. The six possible traffic improvements for which credit could be given are as follows: September 12, 1988 Renton City Council Minutes Pape 260 1) Design a turn movement southbound on Park Avenue N. at N. 3rd to minimize conflicts in the left turning movement onto N. 3rd, including any change in the signal; nN ��' •hP Nor!h Renton Arterial Study to evaluate alternative 20-year development land use scenarios for the impact on the transportation system; 3) Reconstruct the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard/Park/Garden to provide an additional eastbound lane on Park Drive from N. 10th to Garden Avenue N.; 4) Realign Garden Avenue N. at N. 8th to remove the existing dog leg; 5) Signalize the intersection of N. 6th and Garden Avenue N.; 6) Signalize the east and west legs of the Garden Avenue N. and N. 8th Street intersection. With respect to the extent to which the neighborhood mitigation program was to be installed before occupancy of the buildings, the conclusion was that occupancy is not contingent upon installation of the neighborhood mitigation program. However, the developer will have installed all of the neighborhood mitigation program that he has been authorized to install by the date of occupancy. There still may be an open question about traffic diverters, but that issue is outside the control of the developer. Once the developer has been directed to install an element of the neighborhood mitigation program, the Council conditions require the installation as rapidly as possible. It was recommended that the Council permit credit against the $1.1 million bond for regional traffic improvements recommended from the study detailed above when adopted by the City Council, but limited to the six transportation improvements listed in this report. It is further recommended that the occupancy permits for the buildings not be contingent upon installation of the neighborhood mitigation program, but that the developer install those improvements as rapidly as possible after being directed to proceed. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY TRIMM, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Upon Council inquiry, City Attorney Warren explained that the conditions are extracts from those imposed by the Environmental Review Committee on the project. Upon Council approval and determination that an improvement is of regional transportation benefit, credit will be given against the $1.1 million bond provided by the developer dependent upon the percentage of regional benefit. Councilwoman Mathews clarified that the developer had agreed to complete 46 traffic improvements in addition to posting a $1.1 million bond. The six aforementioned traffic improvements, either part or whole, are eligible for credit if determined to be regional in nature by the Council. •MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Reed requested his "no" vote be recorded. RECESS MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL RECESS FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:55 p.m. Council reconvened into regular session at 9:10 p.m.; roll was called; all members were present, except Hughes, previously excused. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report Committee recommending the following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4171 An ordinance was read establishing a special assessment district for water Special Assessment service in the Renton Shopping Center area in Maple Avenue SW, south of District: Maple Avenue Sunset Boulevard, and establishing the amount of the charge upon connection SW, #W-891 to the facilities. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #4172 An ordinance was read amending portions of Sections 4-1902, 4-1912, 4- Sign Code: Billboards 1914, and 4-1918 of Title 1V (Building Regulations) of City Code by prohibiting certain signs and devices commonly known as billboards, and amending the regulations relating to certain other signs. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. Councilman Reed asked whether two billboard permits which were pending earlier are still valid. It was determined that both permits have lapsed since no action was taken. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented the following ordinance for first reading and advancement to second and final reading: SEE NOTE f*_\ B 0 0 AOo SEWFR0 )OAND EDGES SHALL BE MOOTH IS VERTICAL, 0 0 SET SOLIDLY ON THE RING TOP VIEW OF COVER TOP VIEW OF RING 2'- 3I le to --► I 3/a' 3' 2' - 0 s" T - -- — — �=10„ SECTION B-B -A BOTTOM VIEW OF COVER ■ SECTION A- A NOTES: * L () FOR COVER REMOVAL. 2. COVERS SHALL HAVE THE WORD 'SEWER' IN 2" RAISED LETTERS WHEN USED IN CONNECTION WITH SANITARY SEWER INSTALLATIONS, OR DRAIN" WHEN IN CONNECTION WITH STORM SEWERS INSTALLATION, OR "WATER" WHEN IN CONNECTION WITH WATER DISTRIBUTION INSTALLATION. 3. EDGES OF COVER SHALL BE SMOOTH AND VERTICAL AND SET SOLIDLY ON THE RING. ( SEE SPECS) 4 WN WEIGHT OF COVER — 16S LBS. M*d WEIGHT OF FRAME — 23S LBS. MIN TOTAL WEIGHT — 400 LBS. s ASTD+► ^ - 4 & cLA41, 30 , la V)fZE T-_ `2 � � � .. (,,� 1 '�IP C.'-1 FI C ATI O N S. DETAIL N0.10 COVER & RING NON -LOCKING TYPE SATHER FOUNDRY E VE RE TT, WASH. P.O. Box 9156 Tacoma, WA 98409 (206) 475-8888 RENTON (206) 255-1521 SEATTLE (206) 623-7772 FAX (206) 474-7631 WA WATS (800) 922-5338 Manufacturers of Concrete Sewer and Culvert Pipe — Precast Manholes — Low Head Pressure Pipe — Transformer Vaults - Specialty Items — Precast and Prestressed Concrete MATERIAL SOURCES PLANT DRYCAST: CONFORMING ASTM STD.: SUPPLIER: Cement -Type I -II C 150 Tilbury Cement Co. Bellingham,Wa Flyash C 618 Pozzolanic NW, Centralia 3/81, Washed Rock C 33 NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom Pipe Sand C 33 NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom Reinforcing Wire A 496 Davis Walker, Kent, Wash. Rubber Gaskets C 443 & C 361 Best Fitt Co. Everett, Wash. PRECAST: Cement - Type III LA C 150 Tilbury Cement Co. Bellingham,Wa 3/4" Washed Rock C 33 NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom Pipe Sand C 33 NW Aggregates #B-58 Steilacoom WRDA 19 (Super Plasticizer) C 494 W. R. Grace Co. Redmond Daravair (Air Entraining) C 260 W. R. Grace Co. Redmond Reinforcing Mesh A 185 Bergandi Mfg. So. Elmonte, Ca. Reinforcing Rebar A 615 GR 60 Salmon Bay Steel Corp. Seattle Rubber Gaskets C 443 & C 361 Best Fitt Co. Everett Sincerely yours, Jim Trueblood, Engineering Plant Locations: 4601 South Orchard, Tacoma, WA / 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd., Portland, OR / 8908 N.E. Highway 99, Vancouver, WA / Member Pacific Northwest Concrete Pipe Association / American Concrete Pipe Association .. pacific International pig . & Engineering, Inc.,.r,:,� 4601 S. Orchard 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd. 8908 N.E. Highway 99 620 River Road 5032 Dallas Hwy. N.W (P.O. Box 9156) (P.O. Box 11305) Vancouver, WA 98665 Rlo Vista, CA (P.O. Box 5249) INP Tacoma, WA 98409 Portland, OR 97211 (206) 574.3666 (VANC) 94571 Salem, OR 97304 (206) 475.8888 (TAC) (503) 285.8391 (503) 285.2988 (PORT) (707) 374.6173 (503) 585.7350 ' (206) 623.7772 (SEA) f{ , i; 48" MANHOLES F-c> R - T F-S Top5 0. 24.. i7 PI rr, o. r . ) I Fr • T 14 12i11 5 r: T Ste' I dh15 A5 PE ¢U I fLEt7 Base Sections are available In various depths. Channels are provide by the contractor after installation. Special Knockouts or cutouts are manu- factured to order. Manhole sections are available in heights of 1' through 1 2'. Provisions for lifting are provided In all units. All joints are designed for use wlth Rubber Gaskets. Manholes conform to ASTM C-478. Minor Grade adjustments are made with 2"-3"-4" or 6" adjusting rings. Standard manhole steps and/or ladders are furnished with all units. As specified. • 1 N � I II ZFT. _ All joints [- R)y r,)9.6 �� use a con- �ILIW:t n fined round CA CA rubber gask- et meeting '1L l4, PIrE ASTM C•443 .specifications' •', �:i,j�;►` A,P.W.A. Ladders are Standard. Standard Steps Available. �;:'I {•f,' J ' . EFFECTIVE: 8-1•8J ' Pay ,dc International pipe : Engineering, Inc. 4601 S. Orchard 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd. 8908 N.E. Highway 99 620 River Road 5032 Dollar Hwy. N.W (P.O. Box 9156) (P.O. Box 11305) Vancouver, WA 98665 Rio Vida, CA (P.O. Box 5249) Tacoma, WA 98409 Portland, OR 97211 (206) 574-3666 (VANC) 94571 Salem, OR 97304 (206) 475.0888 (TAC) (503) 285.8391 (503) 285.2988 (PORT) (707) 374.6173 (503) 585.7350 (206) 623.7772 (SEA) G �Yr er E IF7 FUTuK-6 O U'rf7:h1l.L. t5 x (5'i I I-.-tL, -i a 114 vault-4c, -ti-- I 2 41T I I � I i 120" I I Base Sections are available in various depths. Channels are provided by the contractor after Installation. Special knockouts or cutouts are manu- factured to order. Manhole sections are available In heights of 1' through 8'. Provisions for lifting are provided In all units. All joints are designed for use with Rubber Gaskets. Manholes conform to ASTM 0-47B. Minor Grade adjustments are made with 2"-3"-4" or 6" adjusting rings. Standard manhole steps and/or ladders are furnished with all units. As specified. All joints use a con- fined round rubber gasket, meeting ASTM C-443. EFFECTIVEB 1.03 DIMENSIONS I- I GROOVE WIDi(1�� a R d M(DIAMETER,I N(DIAMETER) -I--- -, Q AVE?AGE TOLERANCE AVERAGE TOLERANCE I AVERAGE TOLERANCE AVERAGE TOLERANCE i SLOPE DEGREES RUBBER GASKET G H Q DEG o o W IS A L UNSTRETCHED DIAMETER °o STRETC DESIGN I DURO— METER VOLUME ---CUBIC INCHES SI S2 S3 i SG DESIGN DESIGN AVERAGE TOLERANCE MMINMAX l.8 /. . 0.87 W I TTF / z .39Y� r,TOLERANCE `��ea��®�eaoe�ee��Hi�©e©����eeoee���ea��eeceee�eeceo��e�ce��e���e�a�H MAXIMUM r-- X I I i X2 PERPENDICULARITY DETAIL : b ,±c. �L J� A e lal �. . • - e . o M. o p I I H� v D v Groove v c v o z n JOINT DETAIL lit r 0 SPIGOT GROOVE DETAIL NOTES All dimensions shall be given in inches, unless otherwise noted, and ore for bell and spigot in concentric position. Distance A shall be for full joint closure. JOINT DATA FORM MANUFACTURER—y'_���' 7 L. JOINT TYPE -'��� 4aK :� ' -- IDENTiFiCATION N0. f�9/BB JC-w n T UIMtNJIUNJ d M(DIAMETER N(DIAMETER) �wvR00VE WIDTH(W AVERAGE TOLERANCE AVERAGE TOLERANCE AVERAGE TOLERANCE d Q R VERAGE F TOLERANCE Q o• �/o.oloz 1.0 .861 - fo•� .o ' I 6 1 + •I SLOPE DEGREES SI I S2 S3 S4 RUBB TRETCHED a/o AMETER STRETCI DESIGN DESIGN 81L �I.e =R GASKET H p DEG. A L DURO— METER VOLUMEC7 ' UBIQ INCHES DESIGN AVERAGE TOLERANCE MIN MA 3 IT x' -'' �— x2 PERPENDICULARITY DETAIL I ix---L— G� e e Q •6' A " �A. o c c N O.LL; . .o� 0 0 0 _Groove v v m Z JOINT DETAIL — R S 54 SPIGOT GROOVE DETAIL NUIES All dimensions shall be given in inches, unless otherwise noted, and are for bell and spigot in concentric position. Distance A shall be for full ;oint closure. JOINT DATA FORM MANUFACTURER JOINT TYPES IDENTIFICATION NO-- G19/A1� M G� C m Iw GARDEN PLAZA AND PARK PLAZA STORM DRAINAGE REGIONAL DETENTION SYSTEM STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS The Standard Specifications for road, bridge and municipal construction prepared by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Washington State Chapter of the American Public Works Association 1988 Edition shall be hereinafter referred to as the "Standard Specifications" and said specifications together with the laws of the State of Washington and the ordinances and charter of The City of Renton, so far as applicable, are hereby included in these specifications as though quoted in their entirety and shall apply except as amended or superseded by the special provisions herein. A copy of these Standard Specifications is on file in the office of the Public Works Director, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. and in the office of John R. Ewing & Associates, 1314 S Central, Suite 200, Kent, WA 98032, where they may be examined and copied by any interested party. Wherever reference is made in the Standard Specifications to the Owner. such reference shall be construed to mean E & H Properties, where reference is made to the engineer. such reference shall be construed to mean John R. Ewing & Associates, and where reference is made to the inspector. such reference shall be construed to mean an Inspector from Renton Public Works Department. Note: The special and supplemental provisions hereinafter contained shall be in addition to or shall supersede provisions of the Standard Specifications in conflict herewith. Standard Plans: The standard plans for road and bridge construction by the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Washington State Chapter of the American Public Works Association (rev. 04/01/85) are hereby included in these specifications as though quoted in their entirety and shall apply as amended or superseded by The City of Renton standard plans bound herein. A copy of these standard plans and City of Renton standard plans is on file in the office of the Public Works Director, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 98055, where they may be examined and copied by any interested party. Page 1 Headings: Headings to parts, sections, forms, articles and subarticles are inserted for convenience or reference only and shall not affect the interpretation of the contract documents Supplemental and special provisions structure: The specifications noted herein are in addition to, or in lieu of, the Standard Specifications. Where sections are marked "replacement section" or "partial replacement section," the specifications herein are to replace, or partially replace, the Standard Specifications noted. Where sections are marked "additional section." the specifications herein are to be an addition to the Standard Specifications noted; Where sections are marked "supplemental section," the specifications herein are to be a supplement to the Standard Specifications. Page 2 SECTION _1___GENERAL _CONDITIONS 1.01 LOCATION The Garden Plaza and located in the City right-of-way line on Washington Blvd. 1.02 SCOPE Park Plaza regional of Renton. along the Garden Ave. between SPECIAL_ PROVISIONS drainage detention is east side of the east N 8th Street and Lake This project consists of furnishing all labor, equipment, and material necessary for the construction of a regional storm detention system consisting of pipe, manufactured bends. man- hole access and pavement restoration. 1.03 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS The Standard Specifications for road, bridge and municipal con- struction prepared by the Washington State Department of Trans- portation and the Washington State Chapter of the American Public Works Association 1988 Edition shall be hereinafter referred to as the "Standard Specifications" and said specifi- cations together with the laws of the State of Washington and the ordinances and charter of The City of Renton, so far as applicable, are hereby included in these specifications as though quoted in their entirety and shall apply except as amended or superseded by the special provisions herein. 1.04 SIGNING OF CONTRACT The Contractor shall be required to sign the contract and post bond within five (5) working days of Notice of Award. 1.05 PERFORMANCE BOND AND EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE The Contractor shall, at the time of signing the contract. furnish a Corporate Surety Bond in the full amount of the contract price conditioned for the faithful performance of the contract. 1-1 SPECIAL_ PROVISIONS SECTION _1___GENERAL _CONDITIONS --- - - ---------- The Contractor shall assume responsibility for securing and maintaining, during the life of this contract, public liability insurance for bodily injury and property damage liability, including, without limitation, coverage for explosion, blast- ing, collapse, and destruction of underground utilities (X.C.U.) and contingent liability, including products and con- templated operations and blanket contractual liability. and shall protect the Contractor and the Owner. The Contractor shall have the Owner specifically added as additional named insured in said policies, all at no cost to the Owner. The above insurance shall cover the Owner. Contractor and subcon- tractors for claims or damages of any nature whatever, includ- ing wrongful death, as well as other claims for property damage which may arise from operations under this contract whether such operations be by themselves or by any subcontractor or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them and the Contractor agrees, in addition, to indemnify and save harm- less the Owner from all suits, claims, demands, judgements, and attorney's fees, expenses of losses occasioned by the perfor- mance of this contract by himself, any subcontractor, or persons working directly or indirectly for him. or on account of or in consequence of any neglect in safeguarding the work or failure to conform with the safety standards for construction work adopted by the Safety Division of the Department of Labor and Industries of the State of Washington. The amount of such insurance shall be as follows: Bodily Injury liability insurance in an amount not less than $1.000,000 for injuries, including wrongful death, to any one person and subject to the same limit for each person. in an amount not less than $1.000,000 on account of any one occur- rence, $1,000,000 aggregate, and property damage liability insurance in an amount not less than $1.000,000 for each occurrence or equivalent single limit. The Contractor shall not cause any policy to be cancelled or permit to lapse and all policies shall include a clause to the effect that the policy or certificate shall not be subject to cancellation or to a reduction in the required limits of lia- bility or amounts of insurance or any other material change 1-2 SPECIAL_ PROVISIONS SECTION _1___GENERAL _CONDITIONS until notice has been mailed to the Owner stating when, not less than thirty (30) days thereafter such cancellation or reduction or change shall be effective. All Certificates of Insurance, authenticated by the proper officers of the insurer, shall state in particular those insured. 1.06 BEGIN WORK A pre -construction conference will be held prior to start of construction, at which time a beginning date for the work will be determined. The Contractor shall submit his proposed con- struction schedule two (2) working days prior to the scheduled date of this conference for approval. The beginning date determined will be used on the "Notice to Proceed" and will represent the first day of the contract construction period. The Contractor shall give at least forty eight (48) hours ad- vance notice to the Engineer prior to beginning each phase of the work (such as excavation, street paving, etc.) in order that arrangements may be made to furnish an Inspector and accomplish the necessary staking. 1.07 TIME OF COMPLETION Not applicable. 1.08 FAILURE TO COMPLETE ON TIME Not applicable. 1.09 SATURDAY. SUNDAY OR HOLIDAY WORK Not applicable. 1.10 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT Not applicable. Contractor's bid to be lump sum for completion of work specified and shown on plans. 1-3 SPECIAL_ PROVISIONS SECTION 1 - GENERAL CONDITIONS ------------------------------ 1.11 ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION In accordance with the provisions of Section 1-05.12 of the "Standard Specifications," a Certificate of Project Completion will be issued to the Contractor, upon satisfactory completion of the project. The date of acceptance, as indicated on the Certificate, shall be the date upon which the Owner approves the final payment. 1.12 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES All underground utilities known are shown on the drawings. However, it shall be the responsibility of the Contractor, prior to starting construction, to Call ONE -CALL (1-800-424-5555). to check with all owners of utilities (such as water. sanitary sewer, storm sewer, telephone, gas, electri- cal, and cable television) for location of their lines and to protect same from damage and immediately notify the owner of any utility which is damaged during the work. The Contractor shall be responsible for the complete repair, including materi- als, of any City -owned utility damaged by the work, including water services. whether or not shown on the drawings. Copper water service lines, if damaged, shall be replaced in kind by one continuous service line from the water main to the meter. Splicing will not be permitted. Repair of any damage caused by broken water mains or services shall be accomplished by the Contractor. All utilities repair costs shall be incidental to the contract and additional payment therefor will not be allowed. The Contractor shall have materials and qualified personnel available to effect immediate repairs of water and sewer lines which may be damaged by the work. Under no circumstances will discrepancies in location or incom- pleteness in description of existing utilities or improvements. whether they be visible from the surface. buried or otherwise obscured, be considered as a basis for additional compensation to the Contractor. 1-4 SPECIAL_ PROVISIONS SECTION 1 - GENERAL CONDITIONS ------------------------------ 1.13 SOIL AND GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Because of the varying soil composition and ground water levels encountered in various areas and at difference seasons of the year, Owner makes no representation of such conditions as they may pertain to this project. The Contractor shall be responsible for any and all cribbing, sheet piling, dewatering, and/or other construction methods or procedures which may be necessary to complete the project and additional compensation therefor will not be allowed. 1.14 GUARANTEE The work furnished under these Specifications shall be guaran- teed for a period of one year from date of acceptance thereof against defective materials, equipment, and workmanship. Upon receipt of notice from the City of failure of any part of the material, equipment or workmanship during the guarantee period, the affected part or parts shall be replaced with new materials or equipment by and at the expense of the Contractor. 1.15 INVESTMENT OF RETAINED FUNDS Not applicable. 1.16 LEGAL WAGES Not applicable. 1.17 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Not applicable. 1.18 SCHEDULING OF WORK Not applicable. 1.19 STATE TAXES Not applicable. 1-5 SPECIAL_ PROVISIONS SECTION 1 - GENERAL CONDITIONS ------------------------------ 1.20 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT STORAGE If the Contractor utilizes a parcel of private property adjoin- ing the construction site for the storage of construction equipment, a Temporary Use Permit shall be secured from the City of Renton Planning Department. A release shall be pro- vided to the City from the property owner upon completion of the project. 1.20.01 ADJOINING PRIVATE PROPERTY USE BY CONTRACTOR. The Contrac- tor shall obtain written permission to work. store materials. equipment, or park vehicles on any private property adjoining this project. Forms for this permission are available from the Public Works Department office. Project will not be accepted until completed forms are re- ceived by the City. A release shall be provided to the City from the property owner upon completion of the project and prior to acceptance of the work. 1.20.02 PROTECTION & RESTORATION OF PROPERTY. The Contractor shall protect and preserve from any damage or destruction at all times all private and public property in conformance with the provisions of Section 1-07.16 of the "Standard Specifications." In passing through private property, or opening work on right-of-way adjacent to private property, the Contractor must keep up at his own expense such temporary fences, as will be necessary for the preservation of crops and live- stock and the protection of property, and the Contractor shall be liable for any and all damages resulting from a noncompliance with this requirement. 1.20.03 RELEASES FROM PROPERTY OWNERS. Prior to final acceptance of the project by the City, the Contractor shall furnish releases in writing from all private property owners upon whose property the work has encroached, unless such work was called for under the contract. 1.21 NO DAMAGE CLAUSE If the Contractor is delayed at any time in the progress of work by any act or neglect of the Owner, by any separate contractor employed by the Owner, or by changes ordered in the work, or by any cause which the Owner shall decide justifies 1-6 SPECIAL_ PROVISIONS SECTION _1___GENERAL _CONDITIONS the delay, then the time of completion shall be extended for such reasonable time as the Owner may decide. In no event shall any delays or extensions of time be construed as cause or justification for payment of extra compensation to the Contractor. 1.22 CONSTRUCTION STAKING Construction staking shall conform to Section 1-05.05 of the "Standard Specifications" except that the third paragraph shall be amended to read as follows: Stakes and marks shall be carefully preserved by the Contrac- tor. The Contractor shall be charged for costs of necessary replacement of stakes and markers which, in the opinion of the Engineer, were carelessly destroyed or damaged by the Contrac- tor's operation or were destroyed or damaged by others, due to to the contractor not taking actions necessary to the protec- tion and preservation of said points and stakes. This charge will be deducted from monies due to the Contractor. 1.23 PAYMENT BY TON REQUIREMENTS Not applicable. 1.24 DISPOSAL OF WASTE MATERIAL FROM PROJECT SITE All materials designated by the Engineer to be wasted shall be hauled, dumped and spread at the locations selected by the Contractor. The Contractor shall have the responsibility of obtaining his own waste site. All work included in this section shall be considered to be incidental to other items of work and no further compensation will be made. The route taken to the waste site shall be maintained solely by the Contractor in a manner as described below: The Contractor shall be prepared to use water trucks, power sweepers, and related equipment as deemed necessary by the Public Works Director to alleviate the problem of lost spoils along the route. Prompt restoration of the route is mandatory. 1-7 SPECIAL_ PROVISIONS SECTION 1 - GENERAL CONDITIONS ------------------------------ The Contractor shall secure all necessary permits and approvals for any waste site to be used. Copies of the permits and approvals are to be submitted to the engineer prior to starting work. 1.25 PREVENTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION AND PRESERVATION OF PUBLIC NATURAL RESOURCES (CHAPTER 62, LAWS OF 1973. R.C.W. 39.04.120) which provides in part: "All invitations for bid proposals for public construction projects issued by the State of Washington, its authorities or agencies, or any political subdivision of the State. shall set forth in the contract documents to the extent they are reason- ably obtainable by the public awarding authority those provi- sions of Federal. State, and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations dealing with the prevention of environmental pollu- tion and the preservation of public natural resources that affect or are affected by the projects..." Bidders will be expected to comply with applicable portions of statutes, ordinances and regulations and such other regulatory measures dealing with the prevention of environmental pollution and the preservation of public natural resources, as may be subsequently identified by the City of Renton or other public agencies as pertinent to the proposed work. END OF SECTION 1-8 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION 02500 PAVING AND RESTORATION Part 1 - General ---------------- 1.01 RELATED WORK IN OTHER SECTIONS Storm Drainage 1.02 SCOPE OF WORK Paving and Surfacing for this work includes, but is not neces- sarily limited to the following: A. Asphalt Concrete Pavement for roadways and parking areas. B. Concrete curbs, pavement striping and marking. 1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Reference Specification: State of Washington "Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction," 1988 Edition. B. Submittals: Submit certificates from mixing plants stating that all materials supplied conform to requirements set forth by these specifications. C. Protection: Provide adequate protection from damage for all paved areas including graffiti, staining and spillage. until final project acceptance. Replace all damaged work. 1.04 BARRIERS. SAFETY GUARDS AND WARNING LIGHTS Provide for public protection, as required by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. Part 2 - Products ----------------- 2.01 SOIL STERILANT Casaron as per manufacturer's printed instructions. Page 1 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION 02500 PAVING AND RESTORATION 2.02 BASE COURSE Base Course shall be Crushed Surfacing Base Course as per 9-03.9(3) of the "Standard Specifications" and as shown on the plans. 2.03 LEVELING COURSE & CRUSHED ROCK SURFACING Crushed Surfacing Top Course and Keystone as per 9-03.9(3) of the "Standard Specifications" and as shown on the plans. 2.04 ASPHALT PAVING Asphalt Concrete, Class "B", as per Sections 9-03.8 and 9-02.1(4), Grade AR-4000W of the "Standard Specifications." 2.05 PAINT STRIPING AND MARKING A. Approved latex line paint, reflectorized. Color: White. Conform to provisions of Section 8-22 of the "Standard Specifications." B. Letters: Sizes shall conform to existing markings or as directed by the City of Renton Traffic Engineer. C. Pavement Markings: Stop bars, crossing stripes, arrows and handicapped parking stall symbol as per Standard Plan H-5c of the "Standard Specifications." C. Parking Stalls: 4" wide stripes, layout and other patterns as detailed. 2.06 CONCRETE Air entrained concrete. Class B. conforming to Section 6-02 of the "Standard Specifications." Part 3 - Execution ------------------ 3.01 PREPARATION A. Subgrades: Establish subgrades to a neat, smooth surface of uniform Page 2 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION 02500 PAVING AND RESTORATION slope. Subgrades shall be inspected and approved as speci- fied prior to any paving or surfacing. 3.02 EXTRUDED CURB Extruded Curb shall be installed per detail as shown on plans. 3.03 PAINT STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING As indicated on the drawings and in conformance with Section 8-22 of the "Standard Specifications." 3.04 5/8" MINUS CRUSHED ROCK 5/8" Minus Crushed Rock shall be laid. spread, and compacted to a two-inch (2") minimum compacted depth on a firm, unyielding base. No crushed surfacing shall be laid until the Engineer approves the grade and compaction of subgrade. 3.05 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT Asphalt Concrete Pavement shall be constructed in accordance with Section 9-03.8 and 9-02.1(4) and Section 5-04.3(10) B of the "Standard Specifications" that the pavement shall be constructed to the exact thickness shown on the plans or as determined by the City. 3.06 SAWCUTTING Paved street surfacing within project area shall be cut full depth with straight, uniform edges. Breaking out with excava- ting equipment will not be permitted. The asphaltic concrete surface cut shall be given a tack coat of asphalt emulsion (CSS-1) or approved equal immediately before resurfacing, applied to the entire edge and the full depth of the cut. Immediately after compacting the new asphalt surface to conform to the adjacent paved surface (where the surface is to remain exposed), all joints between the new and original pavement shall be painted with asphalt emulsion (CSS-1), or approved equal, and be covered with dry paving sand before the asphalt solidifies. Page 3 SUPPLEMENTAL SECTION 02500 PAVING AND RESTORATION 3.07 CLEAN UP Clean up entire area of all excess materials, debris, etc., and leave project in a neat, orderly condition. END OF SECTION Page 4 ADDITIONAL OR REPLACEMENT SECTION TO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 7_05MANHOLESL_GRATE_INLETSL_DROP INLETS. AND CATCH BASINS 7-05.3(2) CONNECTION TO EXISTING LINE, CATCH BASIN, CURB INLET OR MANHOLE (NEW SECTION) Where shown on the plans, new drain pipes shall be con - netted to existing line, catch basin, curb inlets and/or manholes. The Contractor shall be required to core drill into the structure, shape the new pipe to fit and regrout the opening in a workmanlike manner. Where directed by the Engineer or where shown on the plans, additional structure channelling will be required. A "Connection to existing" item will be allowed at any connection of a new line to an existing structure, or the connection of a new structure to an existing line. No "connection to existing" will be accepted at the location of new installation, relocation and adjustment of line manholes, catch basins or curb inlets. Page 1 APPENDIX r N al2 Top slab t i0 L 01 X '6" MAX - a 48", 54". 72". or 96" Shelf S • = 1/2 "/FT Lad •uct channel& ` shut In field ---- --- - -- i i Ring and cover Adjustment section (Leveling bricks or Grade rings optional) Handholds Steps or ladder Reinforcing steel (for precast base with Integral riser) 0.15 SO IN/FT In each direction for 48" DIA 0.19 SO IN/FT In each direction for 54" DIA 0.24 SO IN/ In each direction for 72" DIA 0.29 SO IN/FT In each direction for 96" DIA Mortar Fillet I �•� . . Precast base with integral riser 48" DIA-6". _f 54" DIA-8", -•��72" DIA-B". )I 1-12" For 48" & 541, DIA—II'-01L or separate cast For 72" & 96"•- In place only '0' RING-i Precast Base Joint NOTES Manholes to be constructed in accordance with AASHTO M-199 (ASTM C 478) unless otherwise shown on plans or noted in the Standard Specifications. Handholds in adjustment section shall have 3" minimum clearance. Steps in manhole shall have 6" minimum clearance. See Standard Plan 'Miscellaneous Manhole Details.' All reinforced cast In place concrete shall be Class A. Non -reinforced concrete In channel and shelf shall be Class C. All precast concrete shall be Class AX. Precast bases shall be furnished with cutouts or knockouts. Knockouts shall have a wall thickness of 2" minimum. Knockout or cutout hole size Is equal to pipe outer diameter plus manhole wall thickness. Maximum hole size is 36" for 48" manhole. 42" for 54" manhole. Minimum distance between holes Is 8". Maximum hole size is 60" for 72" manhole. 84" for 96" manhole. Minimum distance between holes Is 12". Manhole rings and covers shall be in accordance with Standard Specifications and meet the strength requirements of Feaerol Specification RR-F-621D. Mating surfaces shall be finished to assure non -rocking fit with any cover position. All base reinforcing steel shall have a minimum yield strength of 60,000 PSI and be placed in the upper half of the base with I" minimum clearance. Grovel backfili for pipe bedding. For details showing Grade Riny, Ladder, Steps. Handholds 6" MIN compacted depth. For precast bases only, and Top Slobs, see Standard Plan 'Miscellaneous Manhole Details.' Separate cost in place or separate precast base See the Standard SpeCIfiCatlOns for Joint requirements. Reinforcing steel (for separate base only) 0.23 SO IN/FT In each direction for 48" DIA 0.19 SO IN/FT In each direction for 54" DIA 0.35 SO IN/FT in each direction for 72" DIA 0.39 SO IN/FT In each direction for 96" DIA Design Assumptions Height: 8' to 12': Soil bearing value eauols 3300 •/FT2 (MIN) Height: Over 12' to 25' : Soil bearing value equals 3800 •/FT2 (MIN) Di22i6F AdMd M81M aAk 11r dnd or—"' bd )01". DO DATE I RCVIboNS eT A�o MANHOLE - TYPE 3 48", 54". 72" & 96" .n.c.a n.rt ersrnon s n.re.sr..s a.w �wcra watt* Rmv M.m r..o.o November 8,1985 STANDARD PLAN B-23C r 2' CLR TYP �1 96' TOP SUB r' le mot re TOP SLAB 6 B"a 7' Contors atom Foos S� S Bon t) 6' c"Ism Bottom Ftt e *4 Ban 0 6' Gnhrt emiam Face Y CUt TYP 48'0 64'TOP SLAB �l2' MIN i'-----t 3= S•� e� HANDHOLD I'DIA GalwnuaG tabor L z 6' i t2' MIN -43 MANHOLE STEP NOTES Proprietary monhote steps Ore acceptable, provided that they conform to Section R, AASH70 M-199 and meet O1 MI$HA requirements. Manhole step legs shod be porouel or Opproximately radial at the option of the manufacturer, except that OII steps In any manhole shoo be similar. Penetrctlon of outer wall by a log Is prohlblted. 1 I� -L—q. DROP RUNG MANHOLE 5TEP V'ffRb' rt 7 Got%Sm**th 8tN1 I I j' C,,,w to Cyr MISCELLANEOUS MANHOLE DETAILS a' 24' S' s ! oaN. 8er 7f= ••• �•� • .� �.... PREFABRICATED LADDER -+ir—f'CLR 141 GRADE RING ...���..�� ..� Nowtsba !, ?985 st mucl PLAN B-24 Mond Steps -� A 48'DIA Riser section I ^+ grafted to pipe by ' fobrkotor - - - - - - - - - - �- Reinforced Concrete Pipe r I a 48' MIN DLA Mortar I t I A NOTES Manholes to be Constructed in accordance with AASHTO M-199 unless otherwise shown on plans or noted in the Standard Specifications. Handholds In adjustment Section shall have 3' minimum clearance. Steps in manhole Shall hove 6' minimum clearance. See Standard Plan 'Miscellaneous Manhole Details.' Manhole rings and covers Shall be In accordance with WSDOT Standard Specifications and meet the strength requirements of Feaerai Specification RR-F-6210. Mating surfaces shall be finished to assure non -rocking fit with any cover position. All precast concrete shallbe Class AX. For details Showing Grade Ring, Ladder, Steps, Handholds and Top Slobs, see Standard Plan 'Miscellaneous Manhole Details.' 24 o. SECTION A -A Ring &Cover �- Adjustment Section (Levelirq Bricks or Grade Rings Optional) rPrecast Cons (Eccentric unless otherwise specified) Precast Riser Sections Weld reinforcing steel of joints. MANHOLE -TYPE 4 W AY,�, • �rw,N1Y .�. November 8, 1985 it Added MAX ne ht MZ STANDARD PLAN B-23d DATE I REVISION BY APP'p OF RE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 CJ z 0 0 DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING - 235-2631 09, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION - 235-2620 TFD SEPTE011�P TO: DATE: JOB NO.: RE: Bench Mark Correc ons ATTN: GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ COPY OF LETTER o ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ❑ PRINTS ❑ REPRODUCIBLE PLANS ❑ SPECIFICATIONS COPIES DATE NUMBER DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS Attachment to 6/22 88 letter 7 7 88 Statement of Clarification Les Hanson City of Rest r THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPIES TO: SIGNED �kfth D. Grp; TITLE RT'En 9ine inR Specialist [04] a r. IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING — 235-2631 0 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION - 235-2620 O F Ric• z n OIL rn 0 9q O �O P 1�r C) SEPI-I-o TO: DATE: JOB NO.: RE: ATTN : GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU a ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ PRINTS ❑ REPRODUCIBLE PLANS ❑ SPECIFICATIONS ❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED AS SUBMITTED ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS ❑ FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ❑ ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPIES TO: SIGNED TITLE IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE ... ......... i ......... ......... ......... ......... .. ...... .. ........ .. ... ......... .. ......... ... ......... .. ....... ..... ........ ..... ......... .............. ...... . ............ . ............ . .. . . ....... . ........... . ............ ........... ...... . .......... . . ......... ..... .. ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. ... ......... . .. ......... . ...... ... ......... ......... ......... .. ..... ... . ......... . ... ......... ......... ...... ... ::::::: *— ...... ......... ......... ..... ........ .... .... . .... ... ......... ......... ......... ....... : . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ......... ......... . . . . .............. ....................................... ............... I ... . .............. ... ......... .......... ... ... ..... ........... ........... ........................ ....................................... ... ......... ... . ......... ........ ....... ... :::::: ::::::: ......... ... ......... ......... . ..... . ..... ...... ... .... .. .... ........... ...... . ................ .............................. ...... .... ............ ....................... ... ............... ............... ..... . . ........................ . . . . . ............. .. .. .......................... : ... : ... [..,: * - N ...... 777- ..... ... ... ......... .... .... .... ...... . : ...... .... ...... .......... .. ......... ... . ......... . : ...... ..... ......... ......... ....... : ........ ......... 7.....::::I �� .. .. ........ ........ ....... ...... ... . .. . ................. . ...... .. . . ............. .............. ..................................... ............... .................. .... ......... ... ....................................... I ........ . ..... ........ ......... ...... ......... ...... ......... ......... ...... ... ..... ....... � *:. . .... 1,.* *.,.* , , '' *''***'** ... ......... ......... ........ ........ . ......... . ......... ...... ........... .. .................... .............. ... ....... ...... ................... ....... . ...... -71-IG . ... ................. 7 ... *'**"* .... . .. ........ ...... ..... ......... ............. .... . .......... .. ... I ....... ..... . .... PA ......... ......... ... ......... ........ .. ... ......... ...... ......... ......... ........ 7.......7-7.7-77 ... . ..... . .. ..... . ...... .... . . ....... . ....... . . .. . ............. ........................... ........ .... .. ....... ........... .. . ......... ......... ... .... .... : . ...... . ... . .... ... ...... ......... ....... ..... ......... ........ ..... ...... ......... . ....... ... ......... .... .. .... _ .... « ... ......... .... :« ;««»«:. «»««..:_.«.....: «�«: .... . .......................... ... ... ..... ........ . . ....... ........... ............ : ....................................... ....................................... .......... . . ..... ... . ...... ...... ... ......... ......... .... .... ......... .. ... . ... .. ...... ......... ............. ... . ...... ...... ........ .. ... . ...... ... .... . ... ..... . .... . ......... ........ .... ....... ... ... : 777 ... .... .. ......... .. ...... ....... ... ......... ... ........ ...... ..... ... ... ......... ......... .... ... ..... ....... ... ... ... ......... ......... ........... .... ... ..... 1. . . .. ! .. ..... I. ... .. ...... :.. ...... .......................... ... ... .................................. ....... ..... . ........... .......................................... ............................... .................... ... . ........................... ................ ... .. ... ......... ..........' ... .. ........ ........... .............. . ...... ......... ......... . ..... . ....... ......... ......... . ... .... .. .... ........ ......... ...... . ..... I ..... I . , : , 4. .......... . ... . ............. .... . ...... ........... . T.: ..... .... ... ........ ......... ....... .... ....... ... ................................... .......... ... . ......... .. ........ . . . . . . . . ........ . .......... ..................... ........ ........... ........ ... ......... .. . . . ........... .... .... .... Ille.. .. ......... ...... .... ......... .. ........ ... ..... ......... • ... ...... ...... . . .... .... .. .... ......... ..... ... ......... . I ....... .... .... . . . I ... ... ....... ......... .... ........... .................. ........ ... ........777- ... ........... ........ ..... :: Z..I. ...... . .. .. . ......................... ........................ ......... ..................... . .. ..... .... . ......... ................ 4 ................ . ......... .......il...... .. ........... ......... ... . .... I 13 .. ..... ...... ....... ... . ......... ........... i .............. .. . ................ .. .. ....... ............... ................................ .................................... .. - - - ... : ... ... ... ... 1*1 .... .... .. ... ... ... ......... I , , * - * * *.:.. , * - - - ....................................... .. ........ .......... ......... ...... ........ .. ......... . .. ........ ......... . ....... ......... ... ..... . ........ ........ .. .... - - - - - .::: .. ... ..... I ....... 77 . .................. I - -: - -: - - - I .... .. . .. .... . ..... ........ .. ... I ....... . .. .... .......... .. . ........ . ... ... ............ ........... ........ ... . ... ................ . . ................. .................... .............. .................. . 77,.... ............. .... . ....... ......... ......... ... . ....... .. ... ................... ..... ......... ......... ......... .. ..... ...... ......... .. ..... ................................................................. . ........... ....... .... ...... ... ... ... ... ... : .... ... ........... ........................... ......... .......... % .................... ................... ....... ...... .. ..... � ,......... €. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ ................................ .... ... ....... ....... ......... ........ ... ........ ........ .......................................... . .......... .......... ........ . .. ................. ......... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . ... . I .... ............ .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... ......... ...... ............. I ....... . ......... ........... . ... .... ....... ......... ........................... ...... ................... ................. .. ..... . .......................... ........ tA .................................. ... ... ... .................. .... . . . . . . AYL `7 ....... . ......... .... .. .... .. . ... ........ .. . . ........ . ........ ... ... ... ... .. ... .... ... .. ...... ... . . . ...... ...... ...... . . ... .... . ....... .... ............. ......... ....... ........... ...... -777'71-77-.:... .. ......... ...�........... �P° FL A KI SALE, 1 II, 20 2D RAl l_ �A�q'1 •�_ I., 014, �• j � I t �� 2 I j3cu r 2U• � i �� I � � 1 L z — -- �!. i \ lid I ►1 1 _ G A f lip- I' `ILS N I AV p44Z- 26 v I q 0 5.D KTA 2o�Sq-, 3qr i ' _ _ � - - � � 8RT . 5 AT o- T. E IOC. - 3 0 I - i•_ / {CY 4 Mo YA I \ J T5. t-T ............. ................................__r.. . :. �: �ir': ____... . . . � 2'1 10, a I" � .K-D�uI� Gla2V F DA.'rA b qq 2 `AJA(GQ 5rANO VALV E `AJ/ PI PS T. �. Z8c"1 Z� . Z'� ..._..._ ............._...._._..... _......_.........._.. r......---__............___ _._........__..Z4'...._......................._.... ............................... ....._.......... . ..................................................................... ................................_.. _.. _ _........ _................... ._.................- -- _____....._. ... ........ ......... 7i :: � :::::::::.: 0., d �. City of Renton Storm Water Utility North Renton Basin Interim Drainage Study to Address Development West of I-405 (Garden Plaza - Park Plaza) May 1988 Introduction An analysis (using SCS TR-55 Program) determining the expected flows at the intersection of Garden Avenue N and N 8th Street produced a peak flow of 223.39 c.f.s. based on a 25 year storm event. The 48" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) running down Garden Avenue N between N 8th Street and Lake Washington Boulevard is grossly inadequate for carrying this flow and the system must be upgraded. In order to have sufficient capacity to carry this flow, a parallel 66" RCP (or material with similar flow characteristics) is required. The length of system to be contributed by the Garden and Park Plaza (see Figure 1) projects was computed using the existing system capacity for allowable outfall and a 25 year design storm. The necessary volume was determined as 18,774 fts which corresponds to approximately 790 l.f. of 66" pipe. To maximize the early benefit, the pipe contributions should be started on the lower end of the system and worked upstream. In lieu of on -site detention, this contribution will be added to as further development continues in the lower portion of the North Renton Basin. That portion of the basin which lies east of SR 405 would remain as an on -site detention region with any drainage problems on this side being corrected by regional detention rather than by upgrading the I-405 crossings. Basin Characteristics The North Renton Basin contains approximately 773 acres consisting of two regions with vastly different characteristics. These regions are separated by I-405. The upper basin area to the east of I-405 is the Highlands region. The lower basin area west of I-405 is the Valley region. The Highlands region is roughly bordered by Sunset Boulevard on the north, NE 4th Street on the south, Monroe Avenue NE on the East, and I-405 on the west. This region slopes down to the west at approximately 5 percent. While development consists mainly of residential, there are some smaller areas covered with apartments, commercial sites, and schools. Soils characteristics vary anywhere between Type A to Type C (reference; Soils Survey King County Area Washington, United States Department of Agriculture Soils Conservation Service, Nov. 1973.) The Highlands region discharges into the Valley region through several culverts crossing under I-405. Flows are transported from the Highlands region through the Valley region out to Lake Washington. The Valley region is bordered by I-405 on the east, Burnett Avenue N on the west, N 4th Street on the south, and Lake Washington on the north. This region has flat slopes and is highly industrialized with a small percentage of residential. The soils category consists of Type C. There are two points of discharge (see Figure 2) from the Valley region. The majority of the flow is discharged through the 48" concrete pipe running north along Garden Avenue N from N 8th Street to Lake Washington Boulevard. From there it discharges through a series of other culverts and open ditches until it reaches Lake Washington. The second outfall is a 24" concrete line running from the end of N 7th Street out to the Cedar River. Due to the shallow slope, the capacity of this line is inadequate, even considering the maximum available head. For this reason, the two systems are interconnected such that the flow which does not flow down the 24" line will backflow into the 48" line running down Garden Avenue N. Page 2 of 5 Peak 25 Year Flow Analysis The North Renton Basin was broken up into I separate subbasins (see Figure 2) due to topography, existing storm systems, and critical flow control points. The control points were crossings of I-405 and major storm drainage intersection points where one system was joined by another. Due to time restrictions, it was decided that the peak 25 year flow analysis would be done on the SCS TR-55 Program. Existing and future "CN" values were developed using U.S.G.S. soils maps, aerial photographs, and February 1988 zoning maps (see Figure 3). The travel times and times of concentration were calculated using available information on existing storm systems and topographical information from 1968 City of Renton topographical maps. Running the CN value, time of concentration, and travel time through the TR-55 program for each of the 11 subbasins, the peak 25 year flow at the outlet point of the intersection of Garden Avenue N and N 8th Street from the North Renton Basin was calculated to be 289.22 c.f.s. Upon further study of the flow control points, it was found that Areas 1, 2, and 3 flowed to a 21" CP with the maximum capacity of 30 c.f.s. The flows exceeded this volume starting at the 7.9 hour mark at which point the excess flow would take an alternate path to the outlet point.. The excess flow (that above 30 c.f.s.) was lagged by approximately 1 /2 hour, which is the time determined for the flow to run down Sunset Blvd, cross I-405 through the 30" CMP and travel in a ditch along the west side of I-405 to a point joining the original flow path. The resulting peak flow was calculated to be 202.0 c.f.s. When a similar adjustment was performed for area No. 6, the peak flow was found to be 199.1 c.f.s. Page 3 of 5 The peak flow which is required to flow down the Garden Avenu N storm line would be the computed peak flow subtracted by the capacity of the 24" CP outfall to the Cedar River. This will yield 186.9 c.f.s. as the necessary volume of flow which the system must eventually carry. Existing Capacity The storm line running down Garden consists of approximately 2,375 IS. of 48" RCP with seven manholes in between. Calculating the capacity, using Manning's equation, under full head conditions (headwater at Roadway surface), a maximum flow of 93 c.f.s. will flow through. Through trial and error on the TR-55, a rainfall of 2.0 inches, corresponding to a 2 year storm, yields a peak flow down Garden Avenue N of 93.2 c.f.s. which is the approximate capacity of the system in question. For calculation of development contribution, the 2 year storm will be the allowable outlet criteria based on the existing systems capacity. Upgrade Line size Based upon the computed capacity of the existing line down Garden Avenue N and the computed peak 25 year flow, using Manning's equation, it was determined that a 66" pipe with an "n" value of 0.012 is required to parallel the existing 48" RCP. A head of 5.3' is needed to push the 25 year flow through this parallel system of pipes which will discharge into the ponding area on the south side of Lake Washington Boulevard before crossing beneath the road via two 48" CP culverts. Contribution by Park and Garden Plaza On -site detention required for the Park Plaza and Garden Plaza projects was calculated using a 25 year storm with the release rate restricted to the capacity of the existing system (2 year storm). For Page 4 of 5 simplification purposes, all three sites were combined as one with an average CN and the longest Tc taken for the site. The combined sites resulted in an area of 10.4 acres, CN of 92, and the longest Tc being 16 min. Running the calculated numbers through the SCS TR-20 program, a predevelopment 2 year flow of 3.02 c.f.s. was computed. For post development conditions, the same Tc and a CN of 98 were assumed. Passing the post development flows through a simulated detention system (using a structure and reservoir card based on a 66" pipe with a single orifice and overflow at the top of the pipe), successive runs were performed increasing the length of the pipe until the maximum outflow of 3.02 c.f.s. was attained without encountering overflow conditions. The necessary volume to fit these conditions is 18,774 ft$ of detention. This corresponds to approximately 790 l.f. of 66" pipe which is required, in lieu of on -site detention, to fulfill the requirements. Page 5 of 5 ^ frBOM: " DATE: w '--- JOHN R. EWING & ASS ATES 1314 S. Central, Suite 200 KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (206)1i852-6633 TO.1v� 1L— I WE ARE SENDING YOU L! Attached ❑ Under separate cover via_ Cj Shop drawings CI Prints ❑ Plans F) Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ LIETTC 3 ©F UMUSAUTTIL DATE JOB NO. �L �L (� ATTENTI ,, �j'1✓ L t � RE the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected print!$,-.;F�kjA1 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED nVeLcCol ro kJ,S'y* REMARKS / ' ✓,ti1.. IA L l u c l _1 7�c__ (.1 it y—1 1 (' f t17C14 ✓tom+ �.;�, �'� � _. Lt` 'Li.J �� ��l ��ei� b�,e / COPY TO SIGNED: PBOWC12402 AX I., rAW, Mm 0 14 71 It enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. +gip �qT� �r ;.;as�,�:;�zs+�{''Ei�':�r„•.., .. I E R 0 F FrI C E M E M. TO t � _ `� . DATE: FROM I. i , zc% i i JOB CI w tie tl SHEET NO. OF ' JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES 622 S Central CALCULATED BY KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 % CHECKED BY _.___ _ DATE ---- SCALE — -- Gn- -Zv or-r/cE BUDL_, 0I'1- SIT`F l4110/A/S L5, YFX?- C) LoPEo t LOW., 1: o�I-5/.T E CoNvEYA /CC, Sf5TCfl 5 ovgR - pe. CAPdLitr O. -r NE PPOCOSpu 1✓ s , GN t! Po 2 1300' u t�l : t`�FAA r�.� T �cISE �L�Ar(ticCivc,s FC �lar� ri To DF_� All Ir. 2uNQ LENurN ( Vr PGA z5 WAT-122 >cc.6v Pit-' ELFv FIZZ i�t,er� cP07- 149 Wt "/, ., Z5,�0 29,I2 4,oI Z�9% Z5144 Z00,In 3.d, 2164 32.9Z Z.1 q. °�, Z 9.p2 3Z'S Z 3.9 , CCU#(n 2,1-7 0.52�. 3,(D L6�'t (c CPI1' Z•�3 I� So 3zM- -S 3 GF 01 S 1' cj--I P Z.-)L a •5 o io 29, 91 3 E ZS \(f_a&L vq.Ur,(0P9P FCow WILL f-IOT Cef/6T E 1, HFao A13CVE Tt-lfcc.. Pre oPosrro e,m ELEV, .4 1 i ' Binh„ %1- 01471 DATE 2-18-88 CITY OF R E N T O N $ P.O.NO. 41455 REQUISITION DEPT. Utility Engineering ACCT. 421/000/15.596.38.65.62 ACCT. VENDOR NAME AND ADDRESS Grant Construction Co. 1420 N.W. Gilman Blvd., #2853 Issaquah WA 98027 OTY. DESCRIPTION IN DETAIL $ 15,191.29 $ Eli VENDOR NO. PHONE NO. 391-5698 VENDOR "REMITTANCE" ADDRESS AMOUNT L.S Park Avenue North Storm Drain Extension 14,053.00 CONFIRMING 8.1% Sales Tax 1,138.29 TOTAL 15,191.29 D PURCHASING TO ORDER AUTH . BY: RATE 2-18-88 CITY OF R E N T 0. REQUISITION P.O.No. 41456 DEPT. Utility Engineering ACCT. 421/000/15.596.38.65.62 $ 15,674.50 ACCT VENDOR NAME AND ADDRESS Grant Construction Co. 1420 N.W. Gilman Blvd. #2853 Issaquah WA 98027 OTY. DESCRIPTION IN DETAIL VENDOR NO. PHONE NO. 391-56gR VENDOR "REMITTANCE" ADDRESS AMOUNT L.S.Garden Court North Storm Drainage LUMP SUM 14,500.00 CONFIRMING 8.1% Sales TAX 1,174.50 TOTAL 15 674.50 PURCHASING TO ORDER AUTH. BY: jtz1`j '(s .! T E R 0 F F I C E M E TO: i 1 - �L DATE: Az-` -L �.1 . FROM: SUBJECT: rY1� A JOB C� L4 . I L SHEET NO. I OF 1 JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES 622 S Central CALCULATED BY DATE KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE ON- SITE . c'of-rVEYati/(-F C,Ae.Cu��'ro�is DEvpL.'DPFD Flow. I �( o�i -sl r coNvEYA �icL sY5T 1� , g C)VgtZ -rNE CAP,ALitr OP -r NE P12oPos�ru P I� � S • G(-� K {=0 2 t�,,pc.,K u l� l�1 �pP �n.l T /�� S YSTE�-�. USE ��Atilti�(MGs Fc.tvaTl�rl ' To �FTa`'�n-r �,r�� I�G�� lit PE Zu(Q l ENIaTN Ls- l- GL z5 WATP-e IeLp-v QI M ELEV F l3a4RD C,F S) % y T CFlsrl c o .Gel cQ�z . 149' PvL to, oci 717` �, 4o% ZS.�o Z9,Iz 4.0 Go z c6 3 14 ' ;Ch(' `.og?.?� �o ZS.44 7-Qj,�3 3,41 cap - or'4 55 cm P 5.�51 2�a 2 �,t,4 32 9Z 5, 3� GQ �j-CBS b5' LMP S,L-4— �� 2 9 .pz, 3Z•5 Z 3. y C511.7 C31% LDS c'mp Z.17 3.53D.51( Zq.35 3Z,9z 3,1v r17- GB g 52' cm q,So is Z9.91 3 0,4n o,5 ,Cf� ►M�lC /S A, rG T 1 IoTE ZS YcAL vquELo,' EO FLOW WILL N10T CC— rATr~ Y LiF6 9 PBWE Tt-arc,. P2DPflSFv eo" E,,EV. PRODUCT MI fiv n.<: W Grohm. M- 01471 KING COUNTY , W A S II ' Chapter 7 Hydraulic Analysis 'TON ,SURFACE WATER r IGN M Section 7.3 oection 7.3.4 Conveyance System Design & Analysis Pipe Systems AN UAL FIGURE 7.3.4E HEADLOSS CALCULATION SHEET Z 5 `(pap- S-1 ok ►"n 1 Lx 4- h� � 2 zz R 3 i�lie>aQ�r �I AZA SITE W ..A.. B.. .C.. ..0.. (SXL) U 9U. �y = W ` ? Z cc z y ( - O 0 X W St 0 W Q W Y-� W 1-' W a W W; RUN W PIPE z vI vQ� a v� z v� Z Y 2 r v9 Q J * N1 o3 CB TO CB J O SIZE N VEL AREA 2� >_-j m� �-j LL� OF J -W !I Zz �7 �� �1_ � !,"7; �.� c�.��,1 �� (`,17� 9•Lo 11'o 0,I'D Z7.7 7.S Z2. I I J �� r^I I Z � � -/ ! � � �,,i,t �� O � ^. ?7 p• c��. 7 I.OR� 31.5 10 4t ? I ^ [ 1 I .' s� . ! �0 2�j .1 z 5 , td- p 19 Z,I°� ?.S� 7c,gZ 32.9t 0 7Z n �• q o � � ,t N �r4 N O � L Z O L1. . � n t]I 1.1 3 L O M T--T .:A I 7-15 r(otG ,Z" Lti1P �fArrMi�r[iS rl - o.or2— SugMFPC-,Co GLA TL E:I Run-off rates can be determined by the rational formula: Q = C I A ' Q = Run-off in cfs C = Runoff coefficient I = Rainfall intensity in inches per hour A = Contributing area in acres The run-off coefficient (C) should be based on Table 1. The rainfall intensity (I) will be based on the Rainfall Intensit -Duration Curves, prepared by the U. S. Weather Bureau for the area. Ilie curve that is the closest toto the plat will be used (see pages 36 to 43). Where her data of the same nature is used, the engineer should submit the curve along with the design analysis. For drainage areas less than SO acres.Qr producing a runoff of less than 20 cfs, a 10-year design frequency may be used. For areas greater than SO acres " producing a run-off greater than 20 cfs, a 25-year design frequency will be used regardless of the size of the plat. The outlet flow may be further restricted if the downstream drainage basin is presently subject to serious flooding. The time of concentration for rainfall should be computed for all ditches, channels, gutters, culverts and pipe systems. An initial collecting time of 10 minutes for unpaved areas and 5 minutes for paved areas may be taken at the most distant point of flow from a catch basin or culvert. From this point, the overland flow time to the nearest ditch, channel with the flow time for the or gutter may be computed along waterway using Chart 1, page 25, to estimate the velocity for each significantly different slope and overland flow condition. A common error is to combine areas with distinctly different flow patterns such as open, graded, forest and waterways. Once the runoff has reached a storm drainage system, the flow time through the open channel or pipe can be computed. The following minimum roughness coefficients will be used: n = 0.012 for concrete, clay or smooth interior metallic pipes n = 0.024 for annular corrugated metal pipe n = 0.024 will be used for hehical corrugated metal pipe unless the pipe is designed for outlet control or submerged outlet, then the following n values may be used. 3 . 5/79 ---------------- MANNING 'In" PIPE (2-2/3" x 1/211) DIAMETER CORREGATIONS 12" 0.012 15" 0.012 1811 0.014 21" 0.016 24" 0.017 30" 0.018 36" 0.019 42" 0.020 48" 0.021 Storm drain pipe sizes may be selected by nomograph or calculated based on the Manning Formula. Culverts and pipes that are placed in ditches which will pass flows into the storm drainage systems may be designed from a booklet entitled Hydraulic Charts for the Selection of Highway Culverts, by the Bureau of Public Roads. Culverts should e designed to carry the design run-off with a headwater depth not greater than 2.0 times the culvert diameter for culverts 18 inches and under, or 1.5 times the culvert diameter for culverts greater than 18 inches (see pages 27-29). At all times the computed water surface must be at an elevation which will not saturate the base course under the paving. 5/79 K 'I N G COUNTY , W A S r.. N G T O N, S U R FACE WATER E S I G N N1 AN U A L Chapter 7 Section 7.3 Section 7.3.4 Hydraulic Analysis Conveyance System Design Pipe Systems and Analysis 2. Direct Step Backwater Method For Pipes This method of Hydraulic Analysis using Manning's Equation is known as the Direct Step Backwater Method and generally gives more precise results than the simple solution of Mann's Equation given above. It is used to calculate individual head losses in pipe systems which are surcharged and have submerged outlets. These head losses are added to a known downstream water surface elevation to give a design water surface elevation (for a given flow) at the desired upstream location(s). Total head loss = frictional loss + manhole loss + velocity head loss + bend loss + junction loss Frictional loss is computed from Mannings Equation expressed in the form: Sf= (nV)2/2.22 R4/3 = head loss per lineal foot of drain due to friction Where n = Manning's "n" V = Flow velocity in ft/sec = O/A R = Hydraulic Radius The remaining components of total head loss may be computed using standard equations, or they may be estimated using graphical solutions. Figure 7.3.4.0 presents solutions for manhole loss, velocity head loss and bend loss. Manhole loss (curve "A" figure 7.3.4C in the graphic solutions) takes into account the entrance loss encountered when the flow is forced to make a transition into a pipe from a structure such as a manhole or catch basin. Velocity head toss is defined by curve B, figure 7.3.4C in the graphic solutions. Bend loss (curve "C", figure 7.3.4C in the graphic solutions) accounts for the energy required to change direction of flow in a manhole. Junction loss (curve "D", figure 7.3.40 in the graphic solutions) results from the turbulence created when two or more streams are merged into one stream. Several examples of the uses of these graphs are illustrated on the face of the graph. Table 7.3.4 E is provided for convenience. Details In addition to the details shown as Figures 7.3.4 F through J, Standard Construction Details are available in the King County Road Standards. The following table references commonly used details from the 1986 Road Standards: K.C.R.S. IIIIRNM�, Drawing Number Title 30 Field -Tapping of Concrete Pipe 31 Catch Basin Type 1 32 Catch Basin Type I-L 33 Catch Basin Type II-48", 54", 72", & 96" 34 Catch Basin Details 35-38 Manholes 39 Manhole Details 40 Curb Inlet 41-50 Frames, Grates, and Covers DRAFT 7-12 KIN 6 C 0 UNTY, WASH I T O N ,SURFACE WATER D G N M ANU AL Section 7.3 section 7.3.4 Chapter 7 Conveyance System Design & Analysis pi Systems Hydraulic Analysis FIGURE 7.3.4C MANHOLE, BEND AND VELOCITY HEADLOSSES IN STRUCTURES 3.4 Examples 21 in. N r \o — '' Manhole Q� Q2 = 19.5 3.2 Vt = 5.7. V2 = 8.1 Q3 = 9.3 ti 5 in. Head losses 3.0 = 73 0.34 B=1.02-0.51=0.51 2.8 C 0.18 0 D = 0.20* 2'6 Total 1.23 ft loss 93 2.4 2.2 2.0 — 1.8 0 1.6 n 1.4 1.2 Graphic_ example of MH_ 1.0 head losses (above) 8 .6 .4 Qt = Upstream flow (cfs) Q2 = Downstream flow (cfs) Q3 = Incoming volume (cfs) Vt = Upstream velocity (fps) V2 = Downstream velocity (fps) Vh = Velocity head (ft) *See Figure 7.3.4D for "D" Valve. Loss due to change in velocity = Vh.t — Vh•1 "A" minor loss in manhole. Entrance loss in manhole (or inlet). For 33 in. and larger use "C" curve. Loss due to 45' bend in manhole. Multiply by 2.0 for 90°. Deduct 3 for '_2 2 0 , 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Velocity, V(fps) Source: Baltimore County Department of Public Works Loss due to 90° bend. Structure (deduct 3 for 45°). Multiply '•C" curve loss by 1.5 for bends with man- hole or with con- nection:' 0 for bend structures with manhole and connection. 7-13 K'1 -N G CO U N T Y ,WAS s.. N G T O N ,SURFACE WATER ESIGN MANUAL Chapter 7 Section 7.3 Section 7.3.4 Hydraulic Analysis Conveyance System Design & Analysis Pipe Systems FIGURE 7.3.4D JUNCTION HEADLOSS IN STRUCTURES 3.4 3.'_ 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 '_.0 0 1.8 'J 1.6 1.4 1.2 I.0 .8 .6 .4 Typical junction chamber Qj 130. Ut 195. fls - 65 V1 13.5, V12.3 Ilead losses 0 - 2.3 5 — 2.85 - —0.50 (' - 0.60 Total 0.57—ft head loss Velocity in upstream pipe, V (fps) Source: Baltimore County Department of Public Works f23 = 100- T1 Q3 = 50? (21 Q1 =30,. Q3 = 10S Q1 7-14 0 Z I ' I 1 I I 1 /i.� ✓ r f C ' I il'i HIM !�- HH HIM HIMI_ -- Lj -2 q SP i -17, 7 E4 V-T (3� 96, �zl Yc !., / f, I rO r-l I I C-,' 41 II j I IT I I O'I� - -- r I V�l I I G. I I E:' 221 QlT 67 a/ ^J , r �//��J� G Q t�-�V�' v / C% I JOHN R. EWING & AS. .;IATES 1314 S. Central, Suite 200 KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (206) 852-6633 TO A -Cc Q"Jn-_1 WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached C! Under separate cover via_ ❑ Shop drawings [ i Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Copy of letter U Change order ❑ T ��jj L FTI ,—,I,U DATE /(D JOB NO. Z -, (7 ATTENTIO I� RE' 1 the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints C' PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY TO SIGNED:;/- t� PRW11/07 LV_ iM Gnbn Mue. o�ali it enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ,.iEMORANDUM To noDate / ---F'�' From — Subject /\\ s fJ t ' ' I r. �/ c C1 ,/1 VCr 5-J -1 G r` �/ l• S �' V v A<l 1..��,r 1 �SSc'c.e +�-� �b�1b�„J1r�'� V2 YgCY% c_c_ c�c� `� tJ I�� 1G✓N S ��C>r- Y'• (J c_ h r fl, fJ v �c- J '�- \a Li5-, J S PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP APPLICANT: (!;;(V—QEIIJ t'LUZ�I JOB ADDRESS: NATURE OF WORK: K� U TO: L Comments Due DATE • f Z- I G0 5 Comments Due I I ENGINEERING DIVISION I I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I I TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I I BUILDING CODE REVIEW I I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I ( ZONING & PARKING I X I *TIERS 5_ a4M 17- 23 ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION .i 1 % �iC All yyl,'/ �_'.% / r I I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I I NOT APPROVED C>{ -� � 1 �c � �; �c, S l�C � cJ, ,� ��J 5�'0 !✓�,� j �G��l r_ > �' co Act sG y",�. ' Z, �'�, c�✓ ,Q rcG s 12 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative l s j/5 d v��r �rJ r � DATE_ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION I I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS II NOT APPROVED 3) ��� s � I"�J S y S icy,-�-" �►�•, %^ , J c -�c c, f t/�'�5 --ro r t � � A_ C t,-7 �# - TE I- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative 7,�/83 / - V- S-4 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP DATE: 16 -Zl APPLICANT: � nyC— /I 1 PL n e- A JOB ADDRESS: A 2�ChJ L_ NATURE OF WORK: i—) L L, ( CCU T C % /y TO: Comments Due Comments Due I I ENGINEERING DIVISION I I SIRE PREVENTION BUREAU I TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I — _I EJiLDING CCJE REVIEW I I UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION` I I .'_ONING & P.WING I y I OTHERS �Tb �-� r C I I ENERGY CODE Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Building Division by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/ DIVIST.nNf/�/( I I APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS -� NOT APPROVED Pro u/ 'n Y CG, � G S _ -C u { G � � L >'1 '� , �;-� �/cam ✓ice' — Sf�v�t✓�cs� DATE Signature of Director or Authorized Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION I , APPROVED I I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS I NOT APPROVED tt ( rc u i re U 3) ��'� s i �c ` �r d �U�I'1 S tr�=q,�,-, c„^� � � s po= st I t m ` L p \ I l j `) S .{--Cy�S _ U i� L \ O 1 m �C-� ' 6-� <J�%Ve.IO � (Y�c►1 l Q A n j DATE Signature of Director 0r Authorize Representative lQ Pev4, OF R4.V o PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT z � DESIGN/UTILITY ENGINEERING 235-2631 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 %:;7R co. 0 9�TFO SEPlf-oz BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH July 21, 1987 MAYOR MEMORANDUM TO: Dick Houghton ERC'Committee Don Monaghan Ron Olsen Gary Norris t-C-tluck Price John Adamson FROM: Bob Bergstrom, Engineering Supervisor SUBJECT: North Renton E&H/Boeing Office Buildings Garden Plaza and Park Plaza This memo outlines the major impacts to the Director of Public Works from the two E&H/Boeing Buildings. SANITARY SEWERS Park Plaza Large grease/oil/water separator required on food service and garage drains. Garden Plaza Existing 8" and 10" mid block sanitary sewers must be re-routed and easement vacated. New sanitary sewer shall be constructed in Park Ave. N., southerly to So. 5th Street. Large grease/oil/water separator required on food service and garage drains. New sanitary sewer must be operational before old sewer is taken out of service. WATERMAINS Park Plaza Existing 16" watermain across the site must be relocated. New watermain must be realigned and operational before the 16" watermain is taken out of service for foundation construction at Park Plaza. MEMO July 21, 1987 Page 4 MY SUGGESTIONS Garden Plaza Construct sanitary sewer bypass on Park Ave. N. - and AC pave Park and 5th all work non -peak hour. Close N. 6th St. - Park to Garden for staging. Construct foundation - etc. Design street and utility improvements. Construct temporary traffic signals at N. 8th and Garden "Dog Legs" - sign detour route around Park Ave. N. Construct Park Ave. N. street and utility improvements - winter time construction - probably require PCC Pavement. Limit traffic to 2 lanes - 1 northbound and 1 southbound. Open Park Ave. N. - 5 lanes. Construct other utilities and streets. Open all roads and dismantle detours. DmvD D1» Construct new 16" watermain in N. 6th St - Garden to apartments to bypass site - all work non - peak hour and AC pave N. 6th St. Close N. 6th St. - Park to Garden - for staging. Construct foundations. Design street and utility improvements. After N. 6th St. - Park to Garden open see #9 above) and before dismantling N 8th and Garden - temporary signals, construct Park Ave. N. - street and utility improvements - winter construction PCC? Limit traffic on Park to 2 lanes - 1 northbound and 1 southbound. Open Park Ave. N. - 5 lanes Construct other utilities and streets. Open all roads, dismantle detours. 0"i T P" 2D.12.5.6/REB:ckd Bob Bergstrom MEMO July 21, 1987 Page 3 Garden Plaza Provide P,S,&E Design) of intersection improvements at Lake Washington/Houser/Garden/Park intersection. New Traffic Signal at North 6th and Garden. Widen Park Ave. N. - from N. 5th to N. 6th to 5 lanes. Reconstruct N. 5th St. - Garden to Park and channelize for 3 lanes. Provide HOV drop-off lane in front of building on N. 6th St. Park Plaza Construct street and intersection improvements at Lake Washington/Houser/Garden/Park intersection. Widen Park Ave. N. - from N. 6th to N. 8th to 5 lanes. Provide HOV drop-off lane in front of building on Park Ave. N. Construction Period Problems This project will cause serious problems to traffic and utility service if not well scheduled and coordinated. As at the Main/Grady/Benson site, there are problems with staging, moving materials to the site and utility trenching. Because E&H always gets their foundation permits prior to most of the utility design, the two projects here have a major problem because of interfering utilities that the City already owns thru the sites. MEMO July 21, 1987 Page 2 Rnth Citnc Fire Marshall must assign fire flow demands first, then E&H provide fire flow computer analysis to determine watermains needed in City watermain system to provide fire flows. All streets reconstructed/widen must have new 12" minimum) size watermains: North 5th Street - Garden to Park; Park Avenue North - N. 5th to N. 8th; North 6th Street - Garden Ave. N. to Park and perhaps to West. STORM DRAINAGE Rnth Cifnc Provide storm drainage analysis of projects, and analyze down stream storm system on North 6th Street westerly to Cedar River. Provide 10/10 Year Storm Detention on site to control run off to predeveloped rates -012. Provide storm improvements down stream to allow no detention. All streets reconstructed/widened shall have new storm drains constructed to provide 25-year capacity on local drainage and 50-year on trunk capacity lines: North 5th Street - Park to Garden; Park Avenue North - N. 5th St. to N. 8th St.; North 6th Street - Garden to Park and perhaps to West. Other storm improvements may be required in area to prevent flooding of key intersections, buildings, fire access and rescue staging areas. STREET/ROADS/TRAFFIC Both Sites Impact Fees Bonded - Garden Plaza Park Plaza $660,943 488,000 TSM Program both sites - 30% trips by transit or car pool is target. New street lights and underground telephone and power conversion along all street frontages and streets reconstructed/widened. AWzEVIEWS No. 1-5' Y6K Project Nam(,: (%,,-- .pL/W / Building Permit Number: /-3 L1�k3 Date to Utility Billing:— 4Z iQz Business or Use: Site Address: Owner/Billing Address: �-t T x Lot Number(s) Square Footagg Assessment <V 7Z Z 4-0- iv.35 - u �- i 3, ) (05 - Z5 - Z ZZ 2 5 Lv 4 6 D- 000 5 3 7 r7 6 /bob Z5-2?b i g -b 6& W -Z34- /I 005b-09 /5 25& -( •4 AC M r �.OTs 75& 4&O C� D (o U (o 4 ZOO IY-0- 9-79 A) bqlc)-tr N T LAr-S ©a 9 4, - o 5 // � )I 75646,0 - vg-- \ , S7004-3 7564-1p 0- p p& 0- 0 7 i �� 6 9 6 � J 5d DESCRIPTION ADDRESS DATE RECEIVED DATE - CHUCK'S DATE TO DUE DATE TO BUILDING 5 D. DATE TO REVIEW BERGSTROM BUILDING DEPT. PLAN NO. PERMIT BILLING I � -FOTP\L_ PIECES PULL TONTS WIDER 6'� ON THI S SIDE - OF i N E Lt rNE To AC H tE_\lt✓ A TOTFIL 2-tie DEFLELLTION IN FOUR J"OtNT5 (0,6250 PEf-�?\ = t NT -I-) FULL 7�IN�LS _TWEL�t ELrVENTh+ TENTH NNTIA FRO 1^'IEL� P�ELE PtEf- PIECE m l O' l4 IoI iO� Ip' 10' L►NE CONTINUED F3ELIJV`i RIC�ItT PIECE-5 GENERP\L NO�CES C RIG t► f`�_ DESICgrN P. I. OF RYZ BEND STA. Gtco / • 0 I Ep\ BI (NG SPkC 6_1 -- THIS ISTNEEFIRST PjEC. _ I)9IDAT rvllt NO, I) �g EA I O I ff-A t O (b PEC I A L, vQ l i h 3C)" l 10 Lam) 1 F P\ I O' (SPECI PL , WITH 36a' tEULTEE CAF fAFFED ON) ER 10 (viirt1 1 EE TOP PCCESS NhNN0LE5 CARRFTEL 0N) \ I LA 2: sP►C,or PIEc.0 PC>URI_D W\TIj CJJNCREE iOFOR(I EJ)PI�G, \\ SE" Fi RST PIECE \ \ PiaEi �FRoM ACCESS / CE1-t-FACE of EIC-ATri PIECE. STP\, 1 12)-r 15, 50 gE.CaIN CURVE B'f PULLSNC�,OINT_T/g'\MIDEP\ ON W EST S I DEOF LNF_, SPELI RL PIECE. W J 3b'' SELL STUaTEE E,RDUTD ON. \ . SPELL ftL.EJ\B Z' IO PLUG _ — P I ECJc. t) 72:' gS RG.SEWER MF-ETS OR EXCEEDS AFL_ SPECtF1Cf\TI0NS FOR A,S,T,n. C-76 AND A,f�,S1�,T0, nCIO CHSS R , wRLL 'C;' (-��'4') SINGLE ELUP 1 tCRL CRC- I-. �_) RC:I. SEWER rgE.ETS OF� EXC�IE.OS ALL f ST,n , C b AND f�,�,S,H,I,,O, MI-10 5PE aF-ICPMONS FCF\CLASSN M�U_ C.I' S,E,C_ , 3.) i- lL MAr� DOLE m i G I ft S M E_E_i c)R ExC L-Lb F\ST n, C,-4 is AND A,A,S,h,-TL, n qq, 4)901P\TS MEETOR EXCEED f��%ri, C 3 S) LINE LABWT 5ThTIC!:wNIr\3q IS E�fISED ON) At\ FlSSUr' M 0,o4' sOtQT CHAP FOR EACH PIECE ANC AN F)u3mc N ALZ' _C)P\ C),I_1' WhERE..TtAE. LINE IS DEFLECTt_.C)TO AC_hAE,\1F_ThE. z'Iz ° (3EN� , 6) THE INSTt�LL f� T ION COr\1TRF�C:TOR tS i O UNLpAD ALL_ PIPE HNr] (Y1f�N t-1DLL..S �EA,1 �' r�IccE. wElc��ts RPPRox 20,500 Ik�,� c, AccESS no, iNa 2 STA. ► 9 -t-00 - K oRIC�,1N AL D3ESJgvt �. ST/\, Iq t00 m q Eta 1O� Olt PISS, ACCESS MH N0,5A STD, IZfi4� t05 Q R Iql N A.L. D E SI GN Ct, STD, 12-t 40 AcSO � Bro" OTEE WEST. —END PIECE Ft`ICE OFaEu` STf�, I?--t 33,0) �-. ACCESS rq H NO, S S-['P� l3fi 4g, 4S ©RICaINA�_DESiGN � STh . (3 +'SC 17Et\,10'O'I P I E.C.ES 7E-" LINE LA`(OUT FOR 5T0R1"1 DRAINRCIE IN GAARDE_N ME N, aEGININc� tN N. PP�RK DRI,\vE f�ND LA�INC SOUTH. ps 1pe RENTOc_I I W P\Sth I. N GjD N Gate: 8-Z5 ey : Co Pacific International Pipe & Engineering, Inc. Draw+n9 No. Portland , Salem, and Tacoma. aZSSe�_4 ue P lt.C.ES, (L ACCESS ►''`l H N0, 4 ST/� , 15 t29, I7 0RIqINAL bESI G(\� 3TA, IS t 3 0 N� rN c� I ZO" m, H , ISO, I\ STa zOfigB LINE. CONTINUED pBO\J E SPEC .If��_P IrrCE LEFT C�EC� ONNEXT C_rq P - Ef�ST SEEi�BCAE L.F-FT C�_ACCESS MH NO, 3A STA, 16t6q.73 i O)gitI AL. IGnK Ct,_ TOLERANCES REVISIONS O` A r N�F_R'I F_ t iExcert ^• NOTEDI NO DATE 8Y DECIMAL , INsTfaL.�A l ION CAN I R�c,-�oRl, CECCf�l�l�1 INC, 2 S PAN flW WA. FRACTIONAL 3 DRAWN SYcoRK SCALE III tOI MATERIAL 2 4 CHK'D DATE DRAWING NUMBER ANGULAR 6 �_��� TRACED APP'Dq- : e U 10 x u PfUMM ON NO. 1000N CLEARPRKT • TOTAL- PIECES PULL S'CINTS w I DER B'_Tla' ON THI S S IDE OF THE LirNE TO ACCH IE\fE_ A TOTFjL z'ie DEFLE TION IN FOUR JC(NTS (0,625°PER SIN T ) PIFr F l OI l0' LINE CONTINUED F31✓LC)v\3 F� I CGrtT z2E?�. 66' PIELES GENERAL N07F-5 E EEt\J + TEI` . NINTIt PtFL- PIECE PIECE 10' 10' FIE7 oRkGajr�AL- QES lG, P I. OF 2'1z° BEN[) ETA, tat. cc) / CELLFf\CEOF EVCTti PIECE sTa, I �rt 15, 50 E�EC_�IN C.URvE B-\( PULNC:tJ0INTT/g'WIDER ON W EST S I DE OF LNF~ 5PE-L1 RL P► E.CE N DEL. STUBTEE (:ARDUTED (DN. \ . SPEL IF}LFJ\1D Z' 10 PLuC�, - P 1) 72:" 0 FZG,SE.v\JER IYIEETTS OR El\C_EEDS AL- SPEC1FICfiTIONS FOR R.S,T,n, Cl6 r)ND ftR.(]hTO, nC10 CLASS TC I WP\LL 'C' ��314'� SINC)LE EU,.,IP i ICAL CAGE. Z� 36' 0 RCS. SE\�JEF\ nEET5 OR EXCEE.CYS AU_ f\STn, C l6 HND A,A,S.PIT. 0, M1-10 SPE.U�ICRTI�NS CLf�SS L WAU_ 11C11 S. E.0 3,� OLA- MAr�IICL E MR T t1:�I ftLS MEE OR CxC.L�.D f'ISTfq, C,-4�8 AND A,A , s,1�,TL , I'11q9, 4>> JC►o\�TS nEJ-TOR EXCEED f VE5_ n, C-1 3 , S) LINE Lf`\\ OWT STf)TIC)NINC� IS (_�j'fiSED 0IQ Ark flSSUMED 0.04' sOIrQT GAP FOR EACH PIECE AND P\N ADZM0K ALZ' _0Fz, 0,I1' WhE.RE.TtAV LINE IS DEFLEC-TtLTO f(_tt1E\JF_ThE .z'Iz° QE�N�, b) THE f)TION C_0r\3 T Rf�C tCP\ IS i O UNL `ID f`ILL PIPE f�N� (YIAN t101J�� (EP�,1 O' PIECE wCIC�t tS RPPRox 20,500 Iias,� m NO SPIC�b - TNIS 15ThE r=1RST PICC� uAIDAT Flli NO. I) I ffA 10' (sPEC, If�L, VJI i N 3C' I1DLE) 1 Ef\ I O (SPF-CI RL , WITH 3S6� I3ELLTEE L FRf FED ON) E_p� 10 ( \Ai I T t 1 T EE TO P f ES5 NN HCC _'� GRRF-i E(Q OI`iJ \ , \ I E.A 2. sPl��or r�IEC.E ►�ljRl=D W\TI�t CIJNCC�EIE i�FOR� ^ EiJp PLl3G\ C-ACCESS f`1H. INp,2. STA. 19 fi00.82 ORIGINRL DtSIGN C�, ST,A, jq t 3o rol C) Eta loo PI�s, � f�CC ESS MH NO.SA STD, Iz-r4�1oS O��C�1rJAL D ES C)N STD 12..t4o Also .. ,3 TEJ w' sT —END PIECE F/�C.E OF L5 ELL. STr�, 12-�33,01 Ip' 113' 16 ►O' , 10' 17 E-p o' o" '0` P I ECfES _ P IBC S. �- ACCESS I l H NO, S OtRICj IN A L_ DES I qtn STA 13t-5Q � PCESS nh N04 STP� , 15 t 29 , ►-7 DR VC IN AL. G S I CAN ST14�, 15*t-30 7F_" LINE- LA\iOUT FOR 5TOR1"1 DRAINRCAE IN CaP�RDEN ME N, C3EC�IN►NC� Ir\I, N. PP,RK DP1vE POND LAKINC sovTH. 1�E NTOr�i , Wf�St-i t rJC�CAN Date e-?t $ 0y : Pacific International Pipe & Engineering, Inc. Fbrtland, Salem, and Tacoma. Drawn 9 No. N� N STD ?_ofi98 LINE. CONTINUED RBOU E SPEEI-RL_P IE.C.E 7-0 LP Fes' CO NON E�� XT C-M P - SST SE.Ei�eC vQ . .EFT C�JCE.S MH N0.3A sTA, 16t(D9.73 0R►C�V-AAL IDES TOLERANCES REVISIONS C) t NC R F_ -t h C * I_Q"P�j ItA_C I p�/Lu\JUG/ Wft.) 1!%C91T AS NOTED ND DATE 6Y t✓NC�INCE .__1O6N1YImo. E\AJI\NC� fJNb E\F..�.,�I,.IA7>✓S (►tN� DECIMAL IirvSTAuLA l ICnI CAN I RACMRI, CE�.0 P\N_Tl INC, S PAN AW A WA, FRACTIONAL 3 DRAWN BYcioD � SCALE 11� _ IOI MATERIAL 2 4 1 �� CHK'D DATE ��'^y��� DRAWING NUMBER ANGULAR a TRACED APP'D : e VVV Is x 24 PRINTED ON HO, 10WH CLEARPRINT 9 TOTP\L... PIECES PULL sTCINTS W I DER B'T/a' ON THI S S tDE OF THE uNE T0 ACHIE�(E. A TOTPIL Z'le DEFT..-TI0N IN FOUR J0tNT5 (0.r.25 ° PEI� =INT ) PIFr F l0� 101 LINE CONTINUED F3EuI my R►C�rtT �2 En\, �00' PIECES C-�ENERAL NO�CES PALL �1NT5 ElF. E:NTf TENMt NiNTIA P IEL.E P tE E PIECE 10' IQI I TC�7- oRkGWvL< �.51q.N PV OF ?-Ye AND S-W Stoo FIC- CATM MN NI IQ' I apf 8 (NO SRC�oT- THIS ISTHE. F&i ST PEC.E I._AIDAT r`IIIi NO, I) 7e EFA Id I ff-P\ l0 �SPl-C-I�L,vJIiN IE) 1 Eft l 0 (SPECI RL , WITh 3%1 tF-CLTEE C F;ZhF FT=-D ON) ER IO (\PJITI1 1EE TOPPCC.ESSMNMLE-'�GRRFiE.DON) \ \ I EfA 2: sP►(-,oT PIEce. POOR(:-:D WmmI C-ONCKE7�E T OFORc� El�p Pt�G, (Z,Gi'r4NT\ iFIR4,T P1Fr F C-�E1.1_Ff�CE OF PIECE Svf , i (2)-t 65 50 BE.C�►N CURVE. D`i PULUNC� TO 'I NT -T/g'\PJ I D ER CN W EST S I DEOF L-�NE, SPELT HL PIECE w 136' SELL sTUBTEF- (:ARDUTED ON. \ SPELIPrLEND Ur 1) .721' 0 RCG.SEv\1ER 1`F-ET5 CR E. \C.EED5 ALL- 5P ECCtFICP\TIONS FC)R PI, S,T, n, L76 f)N D ftR ISH,TO, f1l I-�0 CHSS 11 I vJ RLL ' C; ��NI) -(:SW LE ILL-UP-1 I C-P`t t-. CP1EiF— �-) 3C' O RCG, SEWED I F-F-T5 OR EXCEEQS P\ - AST fq , C b AND F�,fj.�.H,110, MI-10 SPE(JF-kCP 0NS �C1}�SS ISL WfiU_ `C." S,EIC, 3 t- u- mhr�0LE mR-I I f cs mEET oR f �sTr, C-q�e AND A IA , S,�t.�C� , n Iqq, 4,) J&ra TS nE�-T CR EXCEED S) LINE IS I)f�SED OQ Ark flSSUMEr) 0.04' JOINT CIP P FOR EAC-c PIECE AND RN f1D.3I C)KRLZ' _OF\ O, ICI W h E.RL. TttE LINE IS D EFCa�-TtL TQ AC�tIC-�JF-ThE _z'Iz° QED, 6) THE INST1"ILL-f� T ION CO►\J T Rf-�L TOR IS i O UNICHD RL- PIPE RNA MP�N HO11�5 (Ef�,1 �� t�IEcE wclUt tS RPPRox 20,500 Ik�� C�- ACE5S n H , INC. 2- STA, ►9t00 101 I ►O',- �-- q EA I 101 0" P I ELE.S, ACCESS MH N0,5A S�rr�, Iz-r4g,OS ORIg1NAL. DESIgN CL._, ST/� , 2- t- 40 ALSO ct,- 31& � TEE WEST —END PIECE, Ft�CE C)FaELL ST10\I ►2-t33,01 m �- ACCESS MH N0, S S�T"H l 3 fi 4g , 4S STA 1--3+ 5C) 17Ef�,100'I P 1 EC.ES ` F-" LINE- LA` OUT FOR 5TORIYI DRAINRGIE- IN GARDEN ME N, [3EC�ININC� tr\J NI PP\RK C) RNE- fl\ND LASING SovTH. RENT C , W f�St l I rJC-)TC)N Date: e-Z5TIP By ' Pacific International Pipe & Engineerinq, Inc. IlDra\mnq No. Portland, Salem, and Tacoma, aZ�gg-4 �?- EA110101 P [ECF.S, �--- ACCESS n H NO, 4 STP\, 15t29,1-7 ORtCaIN 1'cL DE51 G�� q -STA. 15 t 30 N� N (�- IZO"0 m,H.1-�0, I STa zOfi98 LINE.. CONTINUED RE) aj sPE�--I-F�L_PIECE LEFT To C() NON F-C�EXT C.m P - Ef\ST 10, ► O' ►O' C�- ACESS MH NO.3A STA, 16t(Dq.73 LEFT TOLERANCES REVISIONS C) A V r NF-RI F- t H FN IIXCEPT AS NOTEOI V \\ J NO DATE BY t- NCB INCH ', SCNN R I=V\J I NCB FNb RSSCC-(AT ES �K DECIMAL , INS-�-A1__1__AI I� CLN t RRC,zOR'� CE�Ct�N�CI INC, 2 S PAN fl�J Ft OVA, FRACTIONAL 3 DRAWN BYcoQK SCALE 111 IOI MATERIAL 4 CNK'D 11 \\ DATE DRAWING NUMBER ANGULAR e TRACED APP'D : e 1• I AS ►fWfM ON NQ 10M CLEARPMIT 9