Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWWP273473 (10)E a� At— ,MM :1 MN [ 0 CONSULTANTS Engineers Planners December 12, 2006 City of Renton 6`h Floor Customer Service Center 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 BHC Consultants, LLC 720 Third Avenue, Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98104-1820 206 . 505.3400 206 .505.3406 (fax) www.bhcconsultants.com Subject: Proposal — SummerwindlStonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Design Dear Mr. Christensen: BHC Consultants (BHC) is very excited about this project and has assembled a highly qualified team to work with you on it. The BHC Team consists of BHC for overall project management, public participation, and civil design; KPG for land surveying, architecture and landscape architecture; Shannon and Wilson for geotechnical, environmental and permitting issues; and McGowan Broz Engineers for electrical and mechanical engineering. This team has successfully completed lift station projects together and is able to provide the following benefits to the City: - ■ Familiarity with Renton Standards and Working with the City ■ Experience Analyzing and Developing Multiple Design Alternatives ��■ Public Involvement Expertise to Address the Concerns of the Neighborhood Vi Experience in Open Cut and Trenchless Pipe Replacement Methods �-■ Facility Aesthetics Expertise so Facilities will Blend into the Neighborhood Familiarity with Renton Standards and Working with the City — BHC is on the City's prequalified utilities roster, designed the utilities for the South Lake Washington Redevelopment Project (currently under construction), and KPG with BHC as a subconsultant is currently contracted for the Hardie Avenue Improvements Project. Our team knows what the City expects for design, communication, City staff involvement, and bid specs in addition to our knowledge of the City's design standards, plan format, special provisions issues, and standard details. Due to our familiarity and experience working with the City, the BHC Team is confident that we can meet or exceed your expectations on this project and deliver it within a schedule and budget that fits with the plans of the City. Experience Analyzing and Developing Multiple Design Alternatives — BHC staff has been studying and designing sewer pipeline solutions for over 30 years and have completed over 25 sewer comprehensive plans. This experience means we understand how to complete a thorough analysis of the site and how it relates to the system. This will allow the City to see as many options as possible for servicing the project area and determine if there is a better, more cost-effective solution for the site or a solution that could eliminate other improvements that are thought to be needed in the area. We will also look at different ways to construct the project. For instance, trenchless methods of pipe replacement could eliminate obtrusive construction disruptions in these existing neighborhoods and potentially allow for better relations between the City and the neighborhood residents. Lastly, a team that has designed over-50 ump station upgrades can smoothly deliver a sound design that will meet the City's needs. City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate LS Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Design December 12, 2006 Page 2 Public Involvement Expertise to Address the Concerns of the Neighborhood — Experienced public involvement professionals will allow this project to go smoothly. Gaining consensus with upscale homeowners and neighborhood associations is an art, and our team has recent experience in completing projects with this element for the City of Bainbridge Island's South Island Sewer System LID project. BHC's Public Involvement plan was so effective that at the end of the project 92% of the affected parcels hooked into the system with the City only receiving two phone calls from the community. The BHC Team has the technical expertise to alleviate concerns and the architectural capability to provide renderings of proposed site alternatives if the community or City so desires. In the end, the City will have a partner in dealing with the affected customers. Experience in Open Cut and Trenchless Pipe Replacement Methods — BHC's decades of experience in sewer pipeline design and KPG's expertise in street design provides the City with the necessary expertise to provide a sound pipe alignment and traffic control plan for the site so the disruptions to the community will be minimized. Our team has experience with trenchless techniques and if that is a viable option, the City can avoid extensive overlay and street reconstruction costs on the project. If open cut is the way to go, KPG can assist the City in developing a paving solution and traffic control plan that will meet the needs of the community and be cost-effective for the City. Facility Aesthetics Expertise so Facilities will Blend into the Neighborhood — The team's architects and landscape architects (from KPG) are well versed in using color, texture, and architectural/landscape elements to create structures and sites that blend into residential neighborhoods. For the Education Hill Booster Pump Station in Redmond, KPG designed the pump station building to look like a house, and therefore not look out of place in the neighborhood. The BHC Team is a collection of professionals that are driven to provide client satisfaction. Listening and responding to client's issues and concerns, exerting the appropriate level of effort on each task, meeting schedules and budgets, and meeting the client's needs are all part of client satisfaction. BHC enjoyed working with the City during the design phase of the South Lake Washington Redevelopment project and is excited at the opportunity to continue our business relationship. We look forward to discussing the project, our team, and approach with you further. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me or Gary Bourne at 206.505.3400 or larry.amans@bhcconsultants.com. Sincerely, SOA� MAMA -- Larry Amtos, PE Project Manager City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Project Understanding and Ivey Issues The City currently maintains two sewage lift stations—Summerwind and Stonegate—and wishes to consolidate operations into one pump station —an enlarged Stonegate Lift Station. The Summerwind sewage is to be conveyed north to the Stonegate station. Stonegate's existing 4-inch force main will need to be enlarged, or augmented, to convey the increased flows to a point of discharge. Several discharge points have been identified in previous studies, and will need to be reevaluated as part of this effort. Gravity sewers downstream of the new force main discharge point will also need to be upsized to handle the higher flow. We see several key issues that will need to be addressed to create a successful project, as follows: • Final Force Main/Gravity Sewer Configuration — Several alternative routes exist for conveying the increased Stonegate flows to a discharge point. After determining the ultimate buildout flows to Stonegate from the combined service area, alternative force main routes will be evaluated with respect to cost, constructability, and traffic and aesthetic impacts. Our approach to this is described in Task 1.2 below. Neighborhood Involvement — We believe that a public information program will be essential to the success of this project. Notable project impacts to the existing neighborhoods include gravity and force main sewer construction in the existing streets (both traffic control and aesthetics issues), and a Stonegate Lift Station above -grade electrical building visible to adjacent houses. The roads are fairly new and in good condition, so cut -and -cover trenching operations may meet with resistance from the residents. The pump station building and new landscaping need to blend in with the existing neighborhood. We have included KPG on our team to develop architectural and landscaping treatments for the Stonegate Lift Station to address this issue. They have successfully done this for other lift stations in the past by making the new pump station buildings look like adjacent houses. Also, we propose to conduct a public involvement program (see Task 2.1 below) to keep the neighborhoods informed, and solicit input. Conveyance of Summerwind Flows Through Narrow Easement — The existing 15-foot-wide easement north of the Summerwind Lift Station (per drawing 2 of 2, 1996 As-Built's) must house the existing 4-inch Stonegate force main (temporarily until upsized), a gravity line north from Summerwind to the existing gravity collection system, and a new, upsized force main from the Stonegate Lift Station. The easement route is in a sodded sideyard between two houses. We will investigate different options to minimize site disturbance while providing needed conveyance capacity. A likely solution is to directional -drill the two new lines, thus avoiding damage to the existing lawn area. Continuity of Service — Flow from household services and the two lift stations must be maintained while constructing new sewers and rehabilitation/closure of the lift stations. For cut -and -cover or directional drilling replacement of gravity sewers, new household service connections can be made on a one -after -the -other replacement basis as sewer work progresses. However, for a pipe bursting approach, temporary collection lines on either side of the street would be required. For the Stonegate Lift Station upsizing, one approach to consider is building a new wetwell and pumps adjacent to the existing wetwell, then connecting the two wetwells with a valved pipe. Next, the new wetwell and pumps could take over while the old pumping equipment is removed. The old wetwell can then provide part of the needed total wetwell capacity. ■ SOQ and Proposal Page 1 [on ■ CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor A. PROJECT APPROACH TASK No. 1 TITLE: ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS RATIONALE: Optimize sewer service with respect to cost, maintenance, future flows, and street disruptions. ACTION OUTLINE (TASK OBJECTIVE): Develop recommended approach to serving capacity needs for combined service area of both lift stations. TASK LEAD (Person on Consultant's team): Larry Amans, PE DISCUSSION: Task 1.1 - Analysis of Current Flows and the Projection of Future Flows The collection areas for Summerwind and Stonegate Lift Stations are defined and are mostly, but not entirely, built out with homes. Therefore, to size new pumps for the system, ultimate flows will need to be calculated which include the buildout of all currently undeveloped parcels. If sufficient pump station data is available (pump run times), the ultimate flows can be predicted as follows: 1) calculate dry weather and inflow/infiltration (1/1) flows based on pump run times and pumping rates; 2) determine existing population from number of existing structures (using aerial or GIS mapping) and people per household estimates; 3) calculate existing dry weather flows per capita (unit flows); 4) estimate additional future flows at buildout by identifying undeveloped parcels (from aerial or GIS mapping) and calculating flow based on estimated population on those parcels times unit flows determined previously; 5) calculate peak flow by totaling existing and dry weather flows and adding allowances for peaking and 1/1. We recently performed this analysis for a Bainbridge Island pump station, and arrived at a dry weather unit flow of 73 gpcd, which is within the expected range. This is a more accurate planning number than using the standard Washington State DOE approximate allowance of 100 gpcd. Deliverable: Memorandum addressing estimated buildout flows as the basis for pump and wetwell sizing. Task 1.2 - Evaluate Options to Meet Capacity Needs To collect and pump sewage from the combined Summerwind and Stonegate service areas, several piping configurations are possible. The BHC team will review past options explored by the City and determine if other options are feasible as well. The City's base alternative identified in the SOQ will serve as a starting point; i.e. 1) abandoning the Summerwind Lift Station and conveying the flow by gravity to the Stonegate Lift Station site; 2) increasing the Stonegate pumping capacity; 3) installing greater force main capacity from the Stonegate Station to a discharge point near NE Sunset Boulevard; and 4) enlarging gravity sewers downstream of the force main discharge point. The BHC team will: 1) confirm adequate capacity of the existing 8-inch gravity sewer to convey Summerwind flows to Stonegate (probably adequate due to the considerable 66 foot drop in the invert grades between the two); 2) identify alternative force main routes and sizes; 3) explore alternatives for constructing two new pipes in the easement just north of the Summerwind station; 4) determine different pump sizes for different force main routes; and 5) determine gravity pipe size required downstream of new force main discharge points. Alternative force main routes will include those identified in previous City studies — along NE 23`d St., along NE 23'd St. to Duvall Ave NE, and to Field Ave. NE (the City's base alternative in the RFQ). Gravity pipe flow will be modeled to determine sizes that avoid unacceptable surcharges. A model such as XP-SWMM can be used, or alternatively, the City could have this work done by those who previously modeled this system. SOQ and Proposal Page 2 :3 E& CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Alternative pipeline (force main and gravity line) replacement alternatives will be evaluated and estimated. They include: • Pipe burst and slip line. The main advantages are minimal street cutting and traffic control, and no competition for space with other in -street utilities. This requires temporary bypass piping to maintain collection service. • Directional drilling. This option allows the existing force main to remain in service during installation of the new line. Drilling tolerances are not tight enough to allow use in flat gravity sewer runs, but are not a problem in steep terrain or for force main application. • Cut -and -Cover. This is the simplest method, but creates the most traffic disruption and is costly if complete pavement overlay is required to eliminate unsightly trench patch lines. Deliverable: Memorandum presenting alternatives, costs, advantages and disadvantages of each, and a recommended alternative. TASK No. 2 TITLE: DESIGN OF THE PROJECT RATIONALE: Need plans and specifications for pump station and pipelines (collection and force main.) ACTION OUTLINE (TASK OBJECTIVE): Produce 95% plans, specifications, estimate, and schedule for construction. TASK LEAD (Person on Consultant's team): Larry Amans, PE — Pipelines; Ron Dorn, PE — Pump Station DISCUSSION: Task 2.1 - Public Involvement Based on our visit to the pump station and pipeline sites, and a review of construction requirements, it appears likely that there will be considerable interest in the project from homeowners near the proposed construction sites. This is because all new pipe will be replaced in or near well -maintained, relatively new streets in upscale neighborhoods. Cutting of the pavement for either trenches or launching/recovery pits for directional drilling or pipe bursting will degrade the appearance of the pavement to some extent. Also, the Stonegate lift station is on a residential lot exposed to nearby homes in this recent (1996), fairly expensive neighborhood. Providing opportunities for input from the public while clearly communicating the proposed features of the project is critical to the successful acceptance of the plan by the neighborhoods. We therefore recommend that a public involvement program be established that includes one or two open houses and public meetings to invite public comment and input. This effort should extend through the construction period and should provide a forum for voicing concerns or suggestions. A program involving mailers, public notices, field signs at construction sites, and updates on a City webpage have all been found to be effective means of keeping the public informed and involved. BHC's Principal -in -Charge, Gary Bourne will lead this effort. He recently completed a similar, more extensive, assignment for Bainbridge Island's South Island Sewer LID, and Lake Forest Park's Sanitary Sewer System Expansion, as well as many others. Deliverable: Schedule and facilitate public meetings to invite public comment and input (unless the City opts to do this). Provide content for inclusion in mailers or for the City's webpage. ■ SOQ and Proposal Page 3 ■ [on CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Task 2.2 - Survey Base Maps The Team's surveyors, KPG, will prepare survey base maps of the pump 1 and previous firms. station site and pipeline routes. The pump station topographic map will be at a likely scale of 1-inch = 5-feet to clearly show project features. Plan and profile topographic sheets will be produced at a scale of 1-inch = 40-feet, or 1-inch = 50-feet if the City prefers. Deliverable: Electronic and hardcopy of station site plan and sewer plan/profile drawings showing existing topography and existing ground profiles along pipeline routes. Task 2.3 - Geotechnical Report The Team's geotechnical engineers, Shannon & Wilson, will I to 6AC; on • perform field investigations of subsurface soils at the pump Kitsap County and the City of station site and along pipeline routes. One to three soil borings Forest will be taken at the pump station site to a depth of approximately 50 feet (existing wetwell is 17.5 feet deep) to determine groundwater depth, soil loadings on a new wetwell, and allowable foundation bearing pressures for a new electrical building. Soil borings along pipeline routes, at approximately 500 foot spacing, will be made to predict groundwater depths, determine recommended shoring methods for pipe trenches, and recommended backfill materials and compaction requirements. Deliverable: Geotechnical Report (electronic and hardcopy) containing results of borings and soils analyses, and recommendations for construction loadings, materials and compaction. Task 2.4 - Plans, Specifications and Estimates The objective in the final design is to create a set of construction documents that are based on sound engineering practices that fully integrate civil, mechanical, structural, architectural and electrical disciplines. The final design must also reflect the common goals of the City's personnel, be easily understandable and biddable by the contractors, and must minimize areas of ambiguity and thus keep change orders to less than two percent. We recommend that, in addition to the 30% documents, regular design review sessions be held with the BHC team and City staff. Formal submittals will be made at the 30%, 60% and 95% points of completion which will reflect the decisions and design concepts from earlier in the design process. Coordination with TSI (or other preferred control system integrator) during this task will insure that the teteme s stem whic_ h is preferred blr the City is incorporated iatQAhe design. The telemetry outputs and local controls will be developed in consultation with the City, and will likely incld'de the following elements, as included in the City's 2004 design of the East Valley Lift Station: • Flowmeter • Level Transmitter, floats • Pump run • Pump/seal failure • Pump overtemp light • Seal/thermal fail reset • Runtime meter • Operation counter • Intrusion alarm • Check valve limit switches This standardized telemetry system will insure commonality throughout the City's stations. For the Stonegate Lift Station upgrade, the above ground electrical building will be successfully integrated into the surrounding neighborhood through the use of color, texture, and architectural elements that provide aesthetically pleasing results that do not look out of place in the community. The setting for the electrical building will be enhanced through careful site placement of structures and landscaping, implemented to blend into the existing residential surrounds. During the entire project process, from design through construction, the City will be assisted in securing approvals for aesthetic review -)I SOQ and Proposal Page 4 ^) ■ City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor requirements and community education about the project. KPG's architects have experience working within residential communities on these types of projects and understand the need for City support and public involvement that keeps a project on track, with an end result that provides the surrounding neighborhood with a "good neighbor" as a welcome addition, and the City with state-of-the-art facilities. Contract documents — "legals" plus general requirements and special provisions — will be prepared. WSDOT Standard Specifications will serve as the base specification, with Special Provisions prepared to address special construction (notably the pump station work) and to include the City's special requirements. BHC will use the recent South Lake Washington contract documents as a template for "legals" and for sewer line construction special provisions (sections 7-08 and 7-17). Following internal and City reviews and revisions, 95% plans, specifications and an estimate will be prepared in both hardcopy and electronic format. Deliverable: Electronic and reproducible copy of final plans and specifications suitable for soliciting competitive bids. Prepare a preliminary construction cost estimate for the designed improvements. Submit the contract documents to the Department of Ecology and King County. TASK No. 3 TITLE: PREPARATION OF BIDDING DOCUMENTS RATIONALE: Need bid documents to advertise for construction. ACTION OUTLINE (TASK OBJECTIVE): Finalize plans, specifications, estimate, and schedule for construction. TASK LEAD (Person on Consultant's team): Larry Amans, PE — Pipelines Ron Dorn, PE — Pump Station DISCUSSION: Following receipt of City review comments on the 95% submittal, the BHC Team will prepare final versions of the following: plans; specification (bid documents plus special provisions), Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost; and construction schedule. Entries in the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost will match those in the Schedule of Prices (contractor's bid form). These items will also track those as written up in the Standard Specifications or special provisions (for example, "PVC Sanitary Sewer 12 In. Diam., LF"). Deliverable: Hardcopy and electronic versions of plans, specifications, Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost, and construction schedule. Electronic formats will be: AutoCAD 2006; Excel and Word 2001, and Corel or Microsoft Project for the schedule. TASK No. 4 TITLE: PERMITTING AND PROJECT APPROVAL ASSISTANCE RATIONALE: Applicable regulatory approvals are needed in order to construct project. ACTION OUTLINE (TASK OBJECTIVE): Provide documents to support project approvals for SEPA process, King County, and other permits as needed. TASK LEAD (Person on Consultant's team): Katie Walter, PWS DISCUSSION: Typical potential permit and approval activities for a project of this type include: • King County construction permits • Regulatory approvals —County and DOE signoff • Environmental reviews and permits — SEPA compliance; Shoreline Permit and buffer mitigation at pump station site. ■ SOO and Proposal Page 5 ■ E& CONSULTANTS City of Renton Sum m erwinci/Stonegate Lift Station Consofidation & Field Avenue Interceptor A street use permit may be required from the County for the areas that are on City property (Stonegate Lift Station) or in City streets or easements. Since these sites are beyond City limits, King County approval of the plans and specifications is required. Plans will also be submitted to the State DOE for signoff. SEPA compliance is required for this project. The Team's natural resources specialists, Shannon & Wilson, will incorporate review of all of the potential environmental issues on the site as they pertain to responding to the checklist. An Environmental Checklist will be prepared and submitted to the City. Additional environmental analyses may be required, depending on the project design. We will then develop supporting reports fill out an expanded checklist if necessary. We assume that the lead agency (City) will issue a SEPA Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance and that the proposed activity will have no unmitigated environmental consequences. However, this determination will be closely assessed as the project design is developed. Due to the Stonegate Lift Station's location next to May Creek, a Shoreline Permit might be required. However, shoreline jurisdiction ends downstream of the lift station site, so a permit does not appear to be warranted. Regarding stream buffer impacts, May Creek is designated a Class 2 stream in this location, with 100-foot buffers, but the pump station is over 300 feet from the Creek. Therefore, buffer impacts do not appear to be an issue either. These preliminary permitting conclusions will be confirmed with representatives at King County, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the City of Renton. Supporting engineering documents (preliminary plans) will be assembled and submitted as required. , We will perform field investigations to confirm absence of wetlands, and will document off site stream conditions where May Creek is adjacent to the pump station site and along pipeline routes. Any wetlands, fisheries and wildlife habitat areas that are identified within 150 feet of the pump station site and pipeline route will be mapped and categorized as defined in the City of Renton Municipal Code. Deliverable: SEPA Checklist, memo report documenting permit investigations, preliminary plan submittal for initial review by regulatory agencies, other permit forms if required. TASK No. 5 TITLE: ASSISTANCE DURING BIDDING RATIONALE: Need to clarify intent of plans and specifications in order to get responsive bids. ACTION OUTLINE (TASK OBJECTIVE): Assist City in answering contractor questions during bid period. TASK LEAD (Person on Consultant's team): Larry Amans, PE DISCUSSION: The objective here is to respond to any bidders' questions to promote informed and cost-effective bids. To that end, the BHC team will: • Attend a pre -bid site visit with prospective bidders, and answer questions regarding the plans and specifications, followed up by a written addendum to all planholders if needed. 0 Respond to bidders' questions via written addenda, if necessary, and as requested by the City. No verbal instructions will be given to any caller without a written follow-up addendum, in order to not give unfair advantage to a single bidder. • Prepare the text of addenda, as needed, and provide to the City. It is assumed that the City will then issue the addenda, although BHC can do this if desired. • Issue plan and specification changes to go in the addenda, if needed. Deliverable: As noted above. ■ SOQ and Proposal Page 6 ■ CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor TASK No. 6 TITLE: SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION RATIONALE: Need to monitor construction progress and products to see that all is in general conformance with contract documents. ACTION OUTLINE (TASK OBJECTIVE): Assist City with periodic field engineering assistance and with office reviews of submittals. TASK LEAD (Person on Consultant's team): Larry Amans, PE DISCUSSION: We understand that the City will provide onsite daily inspection, but the engineer will need to be involved for specific activities in order to assist the City. These activities include the following: Onsite Involvement i - The BHC team will: 1) attend a pre -construction conference, as requested, in order to orient the contractor to the work; 2) provide targeted field inspections for such things as structural inspections (e.g., rebar, concrete sampling), electrical panel wiring check, start of pipe laying operations to observe and comment on approach, and occasional field visits to monitor progress and report to the City. Also, geotechnical engineers will review any excavations for new wetwells, and the beginning of pipe trenching operations to determine adequacy of trench shoring, dewatering, and backfilling procedures. Verification of critical grades for the pump station or sewers can be provided by KPG's surveyors as needed. Office Engineering — Office engineering activities during construction include the following: 1) review of shop drawings; 2) evaluating and responding to requests for information (RFI's); 3) reviewing contractor pay requests, if desired; and 4) evaluating change order requests and issuing written changes to plans or specifications. Startup Assistance — A BHC civil engineer and a McGowan electrical engineer will witness startup testing of the Stonegate Lift Station. Discrepancies will be noted, and re -tests scheduled as needed. A final test report will be requested of the contractor, which will be reviewed and approved by the BHC team, and forwarded to the City. Record Drawings — The Contractor's red -line markup changes to the construction will be drafted on the project plans and forwarded to the City as final Record Drawings (both hardcopy and electronic formats). Operations and Maintenance Manual — The BHC team will prepare O&M manuals which will detail operations procedures, and include the various shop drawings for pumps, electrical gear, generator, valves, etc. Printed material will be enclosed in binders that can be conveniently used by City operations and maintenance staff. Deliverable: Inspection reports, shop drawing comments, RFI responses, reviews of pay requests and change order requests (as needed), pump station start-up report, record drawings, and O&M manuals. TASK No. 7 TITLE: COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT RATIONALE: Keep work progressing on track to meet goals, schedule, and budget. ACTION OUTLINE (TASK OBJECTIVE): Effectively communicate with City and team regarding developments, decisions, schedule, and budget. TASK LEAD (Person on Consultant's team): Larry Amans, PE DISCUSSION: Please see section B. Management Plan on page 9 for our approach to manage the project. SOQ and Proposal Page 7 CONSULTANTS City of Renton Sum merwind/Stonegate Lift Station Schedule Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor We have proposed the following schedule to begin construction in 2008. The time shown for the "Plans, Specs, & Est." task assumes 1 month for each of the milestone deliverables (30%, 60%, and 95%), plus a 2 week review period for each milestone, plus a final 2 weeks to prepare the 100% bid documents. Task Name Alternatives Analysis Flow Analysis Evaluate Options Design Public Involvement Survey Base Maps Geotechnical Report Plans, Specs, & Est. Preparation of Bidding Documents Permitting and Project Approval Assistance During Bidding Construction Coordination & Management Staffing Estimates Our team members' available time to work on this project is illustrated below. This availability is sufficient to enable the BHC team to meet the schedule provided on the preceding page. Percentages are approximate averages over the life of the project, but percent of time spent on the project in any given week can range from 90% to 100% for specific tasks/deliverables. Gary Bourne 10% Craig Chambers 5% Larry Amans 50% Ron Dorn 50% Jim Lutz 25% John Frech 70% Erika Schuyler 70% Greg Harry 10% Paul Fuesel 10% Gerry Gerhardt 50% Tim Wickham 30% Katie Walter 25% Stan Boyle 25% ■ SOO and Proposal Page 8 :1 n [ON CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor B. PROJECT MANAGEMENT BHC has developed a strong reputation for providing quality design solutions on time and within budget. Overall responsibility for budget and schedule compliance, the scope of work, and the technical quality of the work lies on our proposed project manager, Larry Amans. One of the tools that Larry will use to monitor schedule and budget compliance is our project accounting software. Once the City notifies us of selection, we will immediately develop a preliminary scope and budget for City review and approval. While developing the scope, we will concurrently define our technical needs and make staff assignments as appropriate, so that when we receive notification to proceed, our team will already be in place and ready to begin work. Larry will monitor the project's progress such as work products, costs, and schedule on a weekly basis. BHC establishes project cost control by setting up major phases and tasks with discrete budgets in our project accounting software. Time records and expenses, including subconsultant expenses, are entered every Friday. Each week, Larry will have a record of total charges for the week by phase and task, and the same record for the project -to -date. Every four weeks, the job cost control system will create an invoice for Larry's review, and following this review for correctness, it is forwarded to the City. A key element common to all successful projects involves frequent and effective communication between the client and project team and other entities such as regulatory agencies and the public. Larry will communicate closely with City staff using various means of electronic and paper communications. He will include City staff in the evaluations and decision making and review process with meetings, telephone conversations, e-mails, and a monthly Project Status Report if desired. Coordination meetings will be held at various phases of the project so that information can be presented and discussed, key decisions can be evaluated, and the project scope and schedule can be reviewed and modified as required. The BHC Team has a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) system in place to ensure that our projects are consistently delivered with the same quality and thoroughness. Each of our technical staff has a QA/QC Design Procedures manual in their workspace that is followed on every project. Our designs also go through a rigorous internal review process that involves a checklist and the signatures of the reviewer (a person who is not involved in the project) and the designer or Project Manager. These signed review documents remain in the project file and are available for client review at any time. Our assigned QA/QC engineer, Craig Chambers, will be consulted not only at submittal milestones (30%, 60%, & 95% designs), but also early in the project to value -engineer design concepts and project approach. Previous Track Record — Schedule, Budget We encourage you to contact our references to verify our ability to deliver projects on time and on budget using our project management approach. However, to assist the selection committee in its review of our qualifications, we have provided the following table to illustrate our successes of completing projects wltnin scneauie ana Duaget. Engineer's Estimate MNME= Bid Price Final Construction Cost Change Order % IN Designed On Time? Constructed On Time? Waterline Crossing City of Bothell $354 000 $283 500 $280 000 -1.2 YES YES Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion City of Ferndale WA $5,700,000 $4,900,000 $5 100 000 4.1 YES YES Vashon Landfill Stormwater Improvement King County $850,000 $723,938 $703 719 -2.8 YES YES Vashon Landfill Final Closure Kinq County $3 117 970 $2 025 260 $1 869 155 -7.7 YES YES Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase II City of Monroe, WA $6 750 000 1 $5 710 000 $5 810 314 1.8 YES YES East Side Interceptor City of Monroe WA $2 217 150 $1 973 425 $1 993 500 0.8 YES YES Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase IIA Cityof North Bend WA $675 000 $661 040 $674 000 2.0 YES YES Wastewater Treatment Plant Cityof Ocean Shores WA 6 913 153 6 415 366 $6 463 576 0.8 YES YES Wastewater Treatment Plant Ex ansion Cit of Snohomish WA 10 100 000 9 400 000 $10 000 000 6.4 YES YES PS and Siphon No. 1 Woodinville Water Dist. $750 000 $517 935 $530 500 2.4 YES YES SOQ and Proposal Page 9 ■ CONSULTANTS City of Renton Team Organization Chart PUMP STATION DESIGN • Jim Lutz, PE, SE Structural Engineer BHC Consultants • John Frech, PE Designer BHC Consultants • Greg Harry, AIA Architect KPG • Paul Fuesel, ASL Landscape Architect KPG • Gerry Gerhardt, PE Electrical Engineer McGowan Broz Engineers PIPELINE DESIGN • Erika Schuyler, PE Designer BHC Consultants C. PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor SURVEYING ■ I PERMITTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Stan Boyle, PhD, PE Lead Geotechnical Engineer Shannon & Wilson BHC Consultants is a locally owned and managed consulting engineering and planning firm located in Seattle. Our civil and structural engineering staff is one of the most experienced in municipal utility planning, design, and construction in the Northwest. We are very adept at providing efficient design and study services on small, as well as large complex projects. Many of our staff have worked together in the Northwest for 30 years and have collectively solved some of the more intriguing design and construction challenges found in the region. In the last ten years, BHC engineering staff has completed over 150 sewer and water projects for municipalities and special purpose districts in the Northwest. In addition to having unique capabilities in the development of comprehensive sewer and water plans we have provided project planning, design, and construction management services for sanitary sewer collection and interceptor systems, pump stations, wastewater treatment plants, water conveyance and distribution systems, reservoirs, and reclaimed water systems. Having recently completed the South Lake Washington Roadway ■ SOQ and Proposal Page 10 ■ CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Improvements Project design currently under construction, we know and understand the City's design standards, plan format, special provisions issues, and standard details. In addition to this experience, we are also on the KPG Team currently contracted for the Hardie Avenue Transit Improvement Project. Our proposed project manager, Larry Amans, PE, has over 30 years of experience in the design and management of utility infrastructure projects including sewer and water pipelines and pump stations, stormwater facilities, and roadways. Larry has successfully delivered more than 30 projects in the last 10 years, including utilities design for the South Lake Washington Improvement Project. Larry will also lead the pipeline design effort. Gary Bourne, PE will be the project's principal -in -charge and will lead the public involvement efforts. Gary has over 30 years of experience in the design, management and administration of public works facilities and has extensive experience presenting projects and issues to City Councils, Staff, Citizen Advisory Groups, and administration teams. Ron Dorn, PE will lead the pump station design portion of the project. Ron has over 25 years of engineering experience involving over 65 wastewater and water pump station designs, wastewater treatment projects, computer modeling and system planning, hydraulic analysis, transient analysis, and water treatment and distribution systems planning and design. Jim Lutz, PE, SE will be responsible for the structural design of the pump station. Jim and Ron have worked together on over a dozen pump station projects. Gerry Gerhardt of McGowan Broz Engineers will lead the electrical engineering effort. He has been involved in numerous wastewater and water pump station projects in the Pacific Northwest. Gerry has worked with Larry Amans on three recent pump station designs for Bainbridge Island. Katie Walter of Shannon & Wilson will be responsible for the permitting aspects of the project. Katie's technical expertise in mitigation design and applied ecological concepts has helped clients plan for expected permit requirements, implement permittable project designs, and meet project schedules. Greg Harry of KPG is our team's proposed architect. Greg is highly experienced in designing pump station buildings that compliment the neighborhood and community that they serve. Please refer to the resumes under separate tab at the end of this submittal for additional experience of the team. Relevant Project Experience The following project descriptions highlight four relevant projects that BHC staff has completed with in the last five years. 1. South Lake Washington Sewer System Improvements, City of Renton, WA — BHC, as part of a consultant team, provided planning, design, and coordination for the public utilities required to serve the existing 280-acre Boeing site planned for redevelopment. BHC designed the new public sewer collection required for the redevelopment area. System improvements included approximately 5,000 feet of 8-inch to 15- inch sewer and appurtenances, and three connections to the existing 96- inch Metro sewer interceptor pipeline. Additional design elements ■ SOQ and Proposal Page 11 :1 n [on CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor included 16,000 feet of 12- to 60-inch storm drains, 10,000 feet of 12-inch water mains, and 9,000 feet of detailed joint trench layouts. We also provided coordination assistance between the City, franchise utilities, Boeing, the developer, and the design team. BHC Project Team: Larry Amans — Lead Utility Designer 2. Sewage Pump Station K3, Snoqualmie, WA — BHC staff was responsible for field reconnaissance, development of design alternatives, plans and specifications, permitting, coordination of approvals by the City of Snoqualmie and Department of Ecology, and construction management. The pump station includes: 23-HP Flygt submersible pumps (with startup wetwell mixing attachment) in a precast wetwell, below grade valve vault with check valves, shutoff valves, and a pig -launch facility; an above grade CMU building housing a natural gas -fired emergency generator, electrical panels, sound attenuation ducts, and Bioxide feed equipment; together with associated site work and paving. BHC Project Team: Ron Dorn — Project Manager: Jim Lutz — Structural Engineer 3. Rockaway Beach Pump Station and South Island Sewer System LID Project, City of Bainbridge Island, WA —BHC was responsible for the siting and design of a 130 gpm submersible pump station. Facilities included two pumps, and 8-foot-diameter wetwell, a control and telemetry cabinet, stand by generator, odor control canister, and 4-inch torce main. I he siting of the pump station was driven by several factors. Vertical limitations dictated that the station w be positioned low enough to receive flow from dozens of grinder pumps, but high enough to stay within the typical pumping capability of non -clog centrifugal pumps. This vertical balancing act was complicated by finding available property, and by assuring the residential neighborhood that the station would only have minimal Talk: visual impacts. Heavy community involvement and extensive public interest in the project was evident from the beginning, and continued through the design and construction phases. BHC Project Team: Larry Amans — Project Manager; John Frech — Design Engineer Gary Bourne — Public Involvement/Participation; Craig Chambers — Quality Control; Gerry Gerhardt(McGowan) — Electrical Design 4. Lift Station No. 8 Replacement, City of Lynnwood, WA — The new station will be replacing an existing station that periodically exceeds its design capacity and is deficient with respect to safety and maintenance access. The project includes: replacement of the lift station with a triplex lift station with a 1,250 gpm design capacity; a trench -type wetwell to ease cleaning procedures; an above grade building with a hoist, office, and electrical panels; and exterior diesel generator in a custom sound attenuation enclosure; odor control facilities; 2,400 lineal feet of 10-inch ductile iron force main; about 800 lineal feet of replace 15-inch gravity sewer; and associated site landscaping and paving. Specific tasks include preliminary design analysis including site evaluation and selection, force main route evaluation and selection, preliminary structure design, research and selection of non -clog sewage pumps, surge analysis, selection of surge control facilities, design, preparation of plans and specification, and construction engineering services. BHC Project Team: Ron Dorn — Project Manager, Jim Lutz — Structural Engineer; John Frech — Design Engineer; Craig Chambers — Quality Control; Tim Wickham (KPG) - Survey ■ SOQ and Proposal Page 12 : I n [on CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Subconsultants We have included subconsultants on our team to provide support for architecture, landscape architecture, land surveying, geotechnical and environmental issues, and electrical engineering. We have worked with these subconsultants on pipeline and pump station projects for the City's of Lynnwood, Bainbridge Island, and Kitsap County. Brief qualifications of our subconsultants are provided below. KPG KPG, Inc. is an approximately 50-person r\ru anu onu are cErrenu multidisciplinary firm specializing in Public Works contracted for the City of facilities from its offices in Seattle and Federal Way. KPG's municipal Renton Hardie Avenue expertise is with all facets of conceptual design, planning, construction Improvement Project. documents, public process facilitation, and project management. The firm has facilitated dozens of public involvement and concurrence -building processes, and led the approval process with aesthetic review boards. For this project KPG will provide the services of architecture, landscape architecture, and surveying, with staff especially experienced in pump stations and conveyance surveying. Education Hill Booster Pump Station, City of Redmond, WA — The City of Redmond required a pump station building form that complimented the neighborhood and community it serves. KPG designed a single story "house" that is capped by a metal hip roof, and colored and textured concrete masonry walls punctuated by glass block windows. The materials were chosen not only for their durability but also for their ability to attenuate booster pump noises. The emergency power generation exhaust was channeled through a roof "chimney". KPG also designed site improvements including roadway widening, new sidewalks, security fencing and additional plantings for visual screening and concealment. SHANNON MMILSON, INC. Since 1954 Shannon 8 Wilson, Inc. has been providing geotechnical engineering and environmental consulting from its Seattle corporate office. The firm employs 115 professionals locally, including geotechnical engineers, geologists, hydrogeologists, environmental scientists and engineers. Shannon & Wilson team personnel are experts in local geology, standards, and regulations, whose vast knowledge of localized subsurface conditions is the direct result of over five decades of field investigations and meticulous records of their results. The firm has a well - established history working with the City of Renton including :Strander Boulevard / SW 27`h Street Corridor Improvements (Cities of Renton & Tukwila); Oakesdale Avenue S.W. Extension; Honey Creek Interceptor, Highgate Sewer Geotechnical Services; Cedar River Utility Crossing; Lake Washington Boulevard Retaining Wall Design. Soos Creek Area Pump Station D and Pipeline Project, King County Metro — This project is the first phase of a plan to expand the existing regional conveyance system to meet the growing demand for sewer service in Covington, Maple Valley, and Black Diamond. The first phase involves building a pump station and about 20,000 feet of force mains and gravity sewer from the pump station to connect with the County's existing SE 277th Street Interceptor Sewer. The pump station would have a capacity of 10 to 26 million gallons per day; the new pipelines would range from 10 to 48 inches in diameter. The pipeline alignment will involve six creek crossings, including potential directional drilling under Big Soos Creek and SE 288th Street. Shannon & Wilson conducted a large field exploration program, groundwater studies, and provided geotechnical recommendations for trenching and shoring, horizontal directional drilling, microtunneling, pipe support and groundwater control. ■ SOCK and Proposal Page 13 : I 0[on CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue interceptor McGOWAN BROZ McGowan Broz Engineers, Inc. was founded in 1993 and currently has a E N G I N E E R s staff of 12 employees. The firm provides electrical and mechanical engineering services for a diverse range of public clients. The firm provides water and wastewater services to cities and counties, sewer districts, water districts, Indian Health Service and tribal communities via civil engineering firms. The firm's electrical engineering capabilities include high-, medium- and low -voltage power distribution, power generation, instrumentation and controls, telemetry, SCADA, interior and exterior lighting, fire alarm and detection, data and communications, security systems, master planning and energy conservation studies. The firm's mechanical engineering services include HVAC, fire protection and plumbing, as well as power generation and district heating and cooling. The firm also has expertise in value engineering/value design and life cycle cost analysis, and is a recognized leader in sustainable design practices with electrical LEED 2.0Tm Accredited Professionals on staff. Rockaway Beach Wastewater Pump Station, City of Bainbridge Island, WA — McGowan Broz Engineers served on the BHC team as electrical engineers responsible for the design of a new wastewater pump station in Kitsap County. Design included power, standby power (generator). lighting and controls, and a new outdoor motor control center with an integral SCADA system designed to communicate with the existing city-wide control and monitoring system. D. REFERENCES References for BHC Consultants Randy Witt, Public Works Director City of Bainbridge Island 206.780.3707 Noel Williams, Project Manager City of Lynnwood 425.670-6661 Jim Streit, Senior Utility Engineer City of Redmond 425, 556.2844 Resumes References for Larry Amans - Proposed Project Manager Eric Johnston, City Engineer City of Oak Harbor 360.279.4522 Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Division City of Renton 425.430.7210 Chuck Krumheuer, Utilities Supervisor City of Bainbridge Island 206-780.3584 We have included expanded resumes for the team under separate tab at the end of this submittal. E. INSURANCE, RECORDKEEPING, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS BHC carries $2,000,000 in professional liability and general liability insurance, and is financially capable to acquire additional coverage if required by the City. Proof of this coverage, our workers compensation and automobile insurance, and bank and credit references will be provided upon request. ■ SOO and Proposal Page 14 ■ [on CONSULTANTS Resumes of Ivey Personnel Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 26, 2007 Lara Kammereck Roth Hill Engineering Partners, LLC 2600 116th Avenue NE, # 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 CITY OF REN TON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Ms. Kammereck: We are pleased to inform you that your firm has been selected to perform the engineering service for the subject project. The next step in the process will be to establish a scope, schedule, and budget for the work. While your proposal contained most items we will want to include within the scope, we would like to include a couple of additional items of work. We would like to sit down with you prior to getting to far into the scoping to establish the base work tasks to be included. Again, congratulations on being selected, your firm put together a very strong team and we look forward to working with you on this very important Renton project. Sincerely, David riqensen ;/ Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFile Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\UMoth Hill Letter2.r�ENTON D tp 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE �,\'y CITY OF RENTON �J Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 26, 2007 Mark Miller RH2 Engineering, Inc. 300 Simon Street SE, Suite 5 East Wenatchee, WA 98802 Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Miller: The City would like to thank you for taking the time to present on the subject project. Unfortunately your firm was not selected for this particular project. However, it was obvious from the interview that RH2 Engineering is well qualified to perform the work. The City had a number of very qualified applicants to choose from. We look forward to continuing our tremendous working relationship through the current projects you are working for us on and also in the future as other similar projects arise. Sincerely, David Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFile Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\RFPIRH2 Letter2.doc tp 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 K E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50 %recycled material, 30 % post consumer Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 26, 2007 Jeff Lykken Tetra Tech KCM, Inc. 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98101 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Lykken: The City would like to thank you for taking the time to present on the subject project. Unfortunately your firm was not selected for this particular project. However, it was obvious from the interview that TetraTech/KCM is well qualified to perform the work. The City had a number of very qualified applicants to choose from. We look forward to continuing our tremendous working relationship, and look forward to working with you as similar, projects arise. Sincerely, David M. Christensen Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFile Sys\WWP - Waste Water\WW P-2 7-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\RFP\Tetra Tech Letter \DMCtp 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98057 R E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50 % recycled material. 30%post consumer Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation - Written Scores Consultants PACE CHS HCW-L B&C BHC RH2 Tetra Tech Roth Hill Team Members Dave Christensen 55 57 65 73 75 76 81 82 John Hobson 53 51 60 63 63 65 76 79 Rich Marshall Ron Shaffer 69 66 57 80 83 82 73 82 Oscar Cantu 73 58 39 75 60 80 77 80 Malcolm Thomson Total 250 232 221 291 281 303 307 323 Average 62.50 58.00 55.25 72.75 70.25 75.75 76.75 80.75 Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation - Oral Scores Consultants PACE CHS HCW-L B&C BHC RH2 Tetra Tech Roth Hill Team Members Dave Christensen 103 109 116 John Hobson 94 107 113 Rich Marshall 41 43 46 Ron Shaffer 110 103 111 Oscar Cantu 112 102 114 Malcolm Thomson 113 110 115 Total 0 0 0 0 0 573 574 615 Average 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.50 95.67 102.50 Combined Total 62.50 58.00 55.25 72.75 70.25 171.25 172.42 183.25 Combined Average 31.25 29.00 27.63 36.38 35.13 85.63 86.21 91.63 Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation - Written Scores Consultants PACE CHS HCW-L B&C BHC RH2 Tetra Tech Roth Hill Team Members Dave Christensen 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 John Hobson 2 1 3 5 5 6 7 8 Rich Marshall Ron Shaffer Oscar Cantu Malcolm Thomson Total Average Team Members Dave Christensen John Hobson Rich Marshall Ron Shaffer Oscar Cantu Malcolm Thomson Total Average Combined Total Combined Average 3 4 10 2.50 PACE 2 1 5 8 2 1 5 3 7 8 19 21 1.75 2.00 4.75 5.25 Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation - Oral Scores Consultants CHS HCW-L B&C BHC 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 7.00 8.00 19.00 21.00 5.00 3.50 4.00 9.50 10.50 7 4 7 8 6 8 27 24 31 6.75 6.00 7.75 V:K 1 1 1 2 2 2 9 2.25 29.25 14.63 Tetra Tech 2 2 2 1 1 1 9 2.25 26.25 13.13 Roth Hill 3 3 3 3 3 3 18 4.50 35.50 17.75 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: f ��'� /C)'7 OF NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:f� `= NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Kev Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening and s eakin . ' 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. - 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: I -� `Y irm's/Team's Resource Availabil 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. - 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team r SUBTOTAL: �y Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall a parent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL. - Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of _ scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, _ adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? J r 4 Overall project approach J SUBTOTAL: L— � TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: I I Iy :1 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY/2007 - EVALUATION DATE: ��` 5 / �� 7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 KeV Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. - 3 1 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). ..f 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL - Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, f etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City—' 's 6 Project experience matches Cit needs. c-' 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team `' SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: I it Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed, 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Project Management: 1 A ro riate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. - 4 Overall a parent project management capabilities. r- SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program - (regularly erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? �f 4 Overall Project approach r SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: 4^ SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. t 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. S 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL l 2 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & ex erience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 7 1 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team F -- SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION f SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availabili 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with- 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. r- 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall a parent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. — 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program < (regularly erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 'j 4 Overall pro'ect approach c -- .r SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: I I (� i SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: r1 a S NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: �1;MA NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 A licable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. S 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs- 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: _'? d Firm's/Team's Resource Availabilitv: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc-). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: l TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: 11� \ e-A �-"— TF. \'- NAME OF RATER: '-\ �'-1 ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Jud ment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. r 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & ex erience with methodologies, technologies). - s 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project ex erience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with Citystaff. S 4 Overall a parent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc-). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? s 4 Overall ro ect approach SUBTOTAL: c TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: � SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: 1A I NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Jud ment and insight. 5 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 A licable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: I S'/ Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Proiect Management: 1 A ro riate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: v Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall ro ect approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: 1�] SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: �'� S"' a 7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: 12o V NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). S� f 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL S Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & s experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category S and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUM MERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — aJANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: I 1 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: / 3 Proiect Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? s 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: I I % SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: 1-2-5--a NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: -Y- f,? 4 NAME OF RATER: 925 ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. S 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel S SUBTOTAL % Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. S 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & S ex erience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. ` 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. J 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. -5 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWINDISTONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 5 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: / Proiect Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. S 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. S SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, S adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. S 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro*ect approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: I -AP :le:-:31 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: / , 2 5­-0 7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: nab — ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. S 3 Leadership. S 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel .S SUBTOTAL � 3 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. S 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & ex erience with methodologies, technologies). .S 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. S 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: 1 3 tl Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. s 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. S 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Proiect Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. S 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. Z' 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. S SUBTOTAL: /g Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. S 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach .S SUBTOTAL: -?-IV TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: 1 00 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: 1— Z, 5 - b 7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). , S 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 3 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & Z s ex erience with methodologies, technologies). J 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LTD's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team S SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Proiect Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Proiect Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: 1 7 SUMMERWINDISTONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: L— 2 S' C)-7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: a �uSi ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL l� Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM J and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project ex erience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team t SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource -Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall a parent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: ��c�� C.-V--Z ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. . s 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel . $ SUBTOTAL `L Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 3 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & .� ex erience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LTD's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category Z and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 's 6 Project experience matches Cit needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team Z� A� SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Proiect Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: F— TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: SUMMERWINDISTONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:£�- NAME OF RATER: z ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Jud ment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL 7 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & ex erience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. "At 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: __2 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. �-- 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: / > Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. f 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Z ((✓' Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: Z-1 TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. (- 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL "Z Z Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: 3 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: / Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: 0�' Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.. =� 2 Emphasis on communication with client. J 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm?) 4 Overall pro'ect approach 1 - SUBTOTAL. TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: I % SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: �LN, �S ZF✓�'7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: �J�•//h! �ToE35c'�/ ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL G Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & ex erience with methodologies, technologies). ` > 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). " 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LTD's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. of 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 't 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: I z P Firm's/Team's Resource Availabil 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. �7 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Protect Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. r 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. /I 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. ` SUBTOTAL. - Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.. c '- 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm?- 4 Overall project approach 4- SUBTOTAL: L TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: 1 94- SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION�/ / DATE: li�' NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: ( 1. L__ NAME OF RATER: �,��! cle— �� ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 1 Leadership. 17 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL r Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 A licable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 12 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category 11) and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. ('�11C��. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. =J 's 6 Project experience matches Cit needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. i 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Proiect Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. 12 SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, ade uate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: G �--] SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: A42_-1 Z� 7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & ex erience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWIM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category , and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 5 6 Project ex erience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: 75 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. 7 SUBTOTAL: Proiect Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularl erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTA SUMMERWINDISTONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: zs NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: t t Z- NAME OF RATER: T ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Key Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key personnel SUBTOTAL Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & experience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: 1 3 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. �i SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.. `7 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program (regularly erformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall project approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: 1 (V 3 �] CITY OF RENTON Request for SOOs and Proposals Design of City of Renton Sumerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue interceptor Submittal Date: December 12, 2006 The City of Renton is soliciting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) and Proposals from qualified consultants to design the Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor and to provide consulting services during its construction. After the proposals have been evaluated, the highest ranked firms will be interviewed. Selection shall be based upon both the written SOQs & proposals and interviews. All firms submitting qualification and proposals will be notified in writing as to their status upon completion of the process. Women and Minority Business Enterprises (WMBE) are encouraged to submit qualifications and proposals. To obtain a copy of the Request for SOQ's/Proposals, consultant selection evaluation criteria and instructions for preparing and submitting SOQs and proposals or answers to questions, please contact David Christensen at: Wastewater Utility Engineering Section, City of Renton, 5`h Floor, City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055; phone: 425-430-7212; fax: 425-430- 7241; e-mail: dchrlsten@ci.renton.wa.us. Five (5) copies of the SOQs and proposals may be mailed or delivered to � the following address: City of Renton, Attn: SOQ / Proposal — Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Design, 6`h Floor Customer Service Center, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. The deadline for submittals is 4:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 12, 2006. If mailed, the submittal must be postmarked no later than December 12, 2006. BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk Dates of Publication in Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce November 9`h and 16"', 2006 WAWWP-03-0000 CotTespondence - Wastewate6davec\Request for SOQ and Proposal Summerwind Stonegate Notice.doc'11 A tp Y U� ,� CITY OF RENTON + + 1055 S. GRADY WAY RENTON, WA 98055 VENDOR: 072200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE PO BOX 11050 SEATTLE, WA 98111 FOB Point: Terms: net term Req. Del. Date: Special Inst: BILL TO: Page 1 / 1 DATE PO NUMBER 12/1 /2006 18/0001357 SHIP TO: Req. No.: Dept.: PLNG/BLDG/PUB WKS UTILITY SYS Contact: PHELAN, TERESA Pre -Assigned PO#?: NO SUBTOTAL 234.50 TAX 0.00 FREIGHT 0.00 TOTAL 234.50 Account Number Work Order Function Number Amount E 426.000400.018.5960.0035.65.045000 5065/5110 234.501 Authorized Signature Authorized Signature DAILY JOUl I. ') pt COMMERCE PO BOX 11050, SEATTLE, WA 98111 206-622-8272 FAX 206-622-8416 Federal I.D. #91-0193790 ADVERTISING INVOICE BILLING PERIOD ADVERTISE CLIENT NAME 11/16/O6 11/16/06,:, ;3186068. ity of Renton TOTAL AMOUNT DUE INVOICE NO. TERMS OF PAYMENT 234:50;Net 30 1 1 11/16/06 3027 ADVERTISE CLIENT NUMBER City of Renton Office of City Clerk CITY OF RENTON 1055 S GRADY WAY i Renton WA 98055 N O V !+ , O 2006 CITY ERK'S CLOFFICE DI FACF nFTAf H GNII RFTI IRN I IPPFR PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE DATE NEWSPAPER REFERENCE DESCRIPTION -OTHER COMMENTS/CHARGES SAU SIZE BILLED UNI S a TIMES RUN 2 RATE GROSS AMOUNT NET AMOUNT 11/09 204340 CN:LIFT STATION DESIGN 1x67L 1 117.25 11/16 11/09 204340 J SETH CN:LIFT STATION DESIGN 67L 1x67L 1.75 1 117.25 11/16 J SETH 67L 1.75 cm a RR -NC DATE: NARC _ `. , . ATE C.� Chargeine� 61 -t7 W.OJF inction _ A� ER 116, j'v4s OF 196") CM EON CITY OF C RENTOM CERTIF VcAT THE UNOER3 RY.T NED DO ' CER �' I c -- R ?E - ALTMATER,A_ ,. rG°- EDAS A ''.3 ?ER- Or PERJU, 6ERV1 REA}OERED 6R THE., 1{AT T'H' " ' lM IS J ON AND ' '- DESCRIB H REIN, A � � T.1 AGAiNS�U THr OF R CERTIFY TO AP' UNPAID Bll �RIZFD T �.ATE THAT I t`AAU SAID 1K gIGNE " r� i Daily Journal of Commerce INVOICE NUMBER BILLED ACCOUNT NUMBER ADVERTISER/CLIENT NAME TOTALAMOUNT DUE 3186068 1 3027 1 City of Renton 1 234.50 PO BOX 11050, SEATTLE, WA 98111 STATE OF WASHINGTON — KING COUNTY --SS. 204340 No. City of Renton Affidavit of Publication The undersigned, on oath states that he is an authorized representative of The Daily Journal of Commerce, a daily newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a daily newspaper in Seattle, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of this newspaper. The Daily Journal of Commerce was on the 12`s day of June, 1941, approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of King County. The notice in the exact form annexed, was published in regular issues of The Daily Journal of Commerce, which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a CN:LIFT STATION DESIGN was published on 11 /09/06 11 / 16/06 The amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 234.50, which amount has been paid in full. 4 =; Subs *bed an sworn to be re me on 11/16/06 Notary public o the State of Washington, residing in Seattle Affid"avi}_ df Pubiie State of Washington, King County City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Design Submittal Date: Dec. 12 Request for SOQs and Proposals Design of City of Renton Summeiwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Submittal Date: -December -12, t606 The City of Renton is solicit. ing Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) and Proposals from qual- ified consultants to -design the Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor and to provide consulting services during its con- struction. .After the proposals have; been evaluated, the highest:ranked firms will be interviewed: Selection: _shall be based upon both. the written SOQs &.propos- als and interviews. All firms sub- mitting.,qualification-and propos- als will-willin .writing. as to their status;upon,completion of the process. Women andMinority Business Enterprises (WMBE) are encouraged:to submit qualifi- cations and proposals. To obtain a copy of the Request for 'SQQ"s/Proposals consultant selection evaluation, criteria, and instructions for preparing and submitting SOQs, and proposals, or answers to questions, please contact . David . Christensen at: Section, City;of_Renton;;5th Floor, City Hali,;105. 5;South=Grady Way, Renton, WA ,98055; phone: 425- 430-7212; fax: 425-430.7241; e- mail: dchristen@ci.renton.wa.us. Five. (5).copies of the SOQs and proposalsmay be mailed or deliv- ered to the following,address: City of Renton, Attn: SOQ / Proposal — Summerwind%Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation .and Field Avenue Interceptor Design, 6th Floor Customer Service Center, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,. WA 9.6055. The deadline for sub- mittals is 4:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 12, 2006. If mailed, the aubmitta1-must be postmarked no later than December 12, 2006. BonnWI. Walton 'City. Clerk Dates' of publication in the ''Seattle: Daily Journal of Commerce, November 9 and 16, 2006: 11/16(204340) Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 9, 2007 Lara Kammereck Roth Hill Engineering Partners, LLC 2600 1160' Avenue NE, # 100 Bellevue, WA 98004 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Ms. Kammereck: We are pleased to inform you that your firm has been selected to move on to the next step in the consultant selection process for the subject project. The Wastewater Utility will hold oral interviews on January 25, 2007. Your interview has been scheduled for 1:30 p.m. in Conference Room 511 at City Hall. You will have 15-minutes prior to your start time for set-up and 15- minutes after for clean-up. Please check -in at the customer service desk on the 6`h floor. The maximum presentation length is 90-minutes. Each consultant will be solely responsible for how they want to utilize the 90-minutes, but we recommend that you allow time for questions at the end of the presentation. You must provide any audio/visual or other equipment needed for your presentation. The room is equipped with a white board for your use. As far as presentation materials, please plan for six City employees to be present for this interview. Again, congratulations on ovmg on to the next step, we look forward to your presentation. If you have.a*y, questions r garding the process, please contact me at 425-430-7212. Sincerely, f 2 Lid Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFile Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\RFKRoth Hill Letterltmctp 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 1 \ E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 %post consumer vn7R � y> �. �r Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 9, 2007 Mark Miller RH2 Engineering, Inc. 300 Simon Street SE, Suite 5 East Wenatchee, WA 98802 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Miller: We are pleased to inform you that your firm has been selected to move on to the next step in the consultant selection process for the subject project. The Wastewater Utility will hold oral interviews on January 25, 2007. Your interview has been scheduled for 11:00 a.m. in Conference Room 511 at City Hall. You will have 15-minutes prior to your start time for set-up and 15- minutes after for clean-up. Please check -in at the customer service desk on the 6`h floor. The maximum presentation length is 90-minutes. Each consultant will be solely responsible for how they want to utilize the 90-minutes, but we recommend that you allow time for questions at the end of the presentation. You must provide any audio/visual or other equipment needed for your presentation. The room is equipped with a white board for your use. As far as presentation materials, please plan for six City employees to be present for this interview. Again, congratulations on moving on to the next step, we look forward to your presentation. If you have any questions f egarding the process, please contact me at 425-430-7212. r Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFile Sys\WWP - Wastewater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Rep1acement\RFP\RH2 Letter.doc R p 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 9, 2007 Jeff Lykken Tetra Tech KCM, Inc. 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98101 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Lykken: We are pleased to inform you that your firm has been selected to move on to the next step in the consultant selection process for the subject project. The Wastewater Utility will hold oral interviews on January 25, 2007. Your interview has been scheduled for 9:00 a.m. in Conference Room 511 at City Hall. You will have 15-minutes prior to your start time for set-up and 15- minutes after for clean-up. Please check -in at the customer service desk on the 6`h floor. The maximum presentation length is 90-minutes. Each consultant will be solely responsible for how they want to utilize the 90-minutes, but we recommend that you allow time for questions at the end of the presentation. You must provide any audio/visual or other equipment needed for your presentation. The room is equipped with a white board for your use. As far as presentation materials, please plan for six City employees to be present for this interview. Again, congratulations on moving on to the next step, we look forward to your presentation. If you have uesti garding the process, please contact me at 425-430-7212. Sitte'ep4y, W Supervisor H:\File Sys1W WP - Wastewater\W WP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS ReplacementlRFPlTetra Tech LetterXlgplDMCtp T O N 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 k E N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer 4 �' r CITY OF RENTON Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 9, 2007 Gareth A. Grube PACE Engineers, Inc. 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Grube: The Wastewater Utility would like to thank you for your proposal on the subject project. We regret to inform you that your firm was not selected to continue in the selection process. We appreciate the hard work that you put into this effort, and hope to see future submittals from your firm on future requests. If you have any Sincerely, Wastewater Utility Supervisor this subject, please contact me at 425-430-7212. HA\File Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\RFP\PACE Letter.doo11}Bij�lCtp N T O N 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 1` E AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50 % recycled material. 30 %post consumer Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 9, 2007 Todd J. Keithahn Brown and Caldwell 701 Pike Street, Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98101 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Keithahn: The Wastewater Utility would like to thank you for your proposal on the subject project. We regret to inform you that your firm was not selected to continue in the selection process. We appreciate the hard work that you put into this effort, and hope to see future submittals from your firm on future requests. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact me at 425-430-7212. ZSinc Ty, z 7 rd M. en Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFile Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\RFP\Brown and Caldwell Letter.doc\DMCtp R E N T O N 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 / post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE �Y CITY OF RENTON RD`+ Kathy Keolker, Mayor N�0 January 9, 2007 Scott Christensen CHS Engineers, LLC 12507 Bel -Red Road, Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98005-2500 Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Christensen: The Wastewater Utility would like to thank you for your proposal on the subject project. We regret to inform you that your firm was not selected to continue in the selection process. We appreciate the hard work that you put into this effort, and hope to see future submittals from your firm on future requests. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact me at 425-430-7212. Sincre,�� enDavidMn Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFi1c Sys\W WP - WasteWater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS ReplacementT-MCHS Letter.doc R"t 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50 %recycled material, 30 % post consumer Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 9, 2007 Robin Nelson Hammond Collier Wade Livingstone 4010 Stone Way North, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98103-8090 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Nelson: The Wastewater Utility would like to thank you for your proposal on the subject project. We regret to inform you that your firm was not selected to continue in the selection process. We appreciate the hard work that you put into this effort, and hope to see future submittals from your firm on future requests. ing this subject, please contact me at 425430-7212. Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFile Sys\WWP - WasteWater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\RFPIHCWL Letter.doRfNTON C1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 This paper contains 50 %recycled material, 30 % post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON ""'R �1 Kathy Keolker, Mayor January 9, 2007 Larry Amans BHC Consultants 720 Third Avenue, Suite 1200 Seattle, WA 98104-1820 Planning/Building/PublicWorks Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENUE INTERCEPTOR PROJECT Dear Mr. Amans: The Wastewater Utility would like to thank you for your proposal on the subject project. We regret to inform you that your firm was not selected to continue in the selection process. We appreciate the hard work that you put into this effort, and hope to see future submittals from your firm on future requests. If you have any questions regarding this subject, please contact me at 425-430-7212. Sin el , Chri s Wastewater Utility Supervisor HAFile Sys\W WP - Wastewater\WWP-27-xxxx Summerwind-Stonegate LS Replacement\RFPIBHC Letter.doc Ctp 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 E N T O N AHEAD OF THE CURVE This paper contains 50 %recycled material, 30 % post consumer i ��4L ^� i Team Members Dave Christensen John Hobson Rich Marshall Ron Shaffer Oscar Cantu Malcolm Thomson Total Average Team Members Dave Christensen John Hobson Rich Marshall Ron Shaffer Oscar Cantu Malcolm Thomson Total Average Combined Total Combined Average Team Members Dave Christensen John Hobson Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation - Written Scores Consultants PACE CHS HCW-L B&C BHC RH2 55 57 65 73 75 76 53 51 60 63 63 65 69 66 57 80 83 82 73 58 39 75 60 80 250 232 221 291 281 303 62.50 58.00 55.25 72.75 70.25 75.75 Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation - Oral Scores Consultants PACE CHS HCW-L B&C BHC RH2 Tetra Tech Roth Hill 81 82 76 79 73 82 77 80 307 323 76.75 80.75 Tetra Tech Roth Hill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.50 58.00 55.25 72.75 70.25 75.75 76.75 80.75 31.25 29.00 27.63 36.38 35.13 37.88 38.38 40.38 Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation - Written Scores Consultants PACE CHS HCW-L B&C BHC RH2 Tetra Tech Roth Hill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2 1 3 5 5 6 7 8 Rich Marshall Ron Shaffer Oscar Cantu Malcolm Thomson Total Average Team Members Dave Christensen John Hobson Rich Marshall Ron Shaffer Oscar Cantu Malcolm Thomson Total Average Combined Total Combined Average 3 2 1 5 8 7 4 7 4 2 1 5 3 8 6 8 10 7 8 19 21 27 24 31 2.50 1.75 2.00 4.75 5.25 6.75 6.00 7.75 Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation - Oral Scores Consultants PACE CHS HCW-L B&C BHC RH2 Tetra Tech Roth Hill 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 12 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 10.00 7.00 8.00 19.00 21.00 29.00 27.00 32.00 5.00 3.50 4.00 9.50 10.50 14.50 13.50 16.00 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: I - 7 - o % NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: %3 P C NAME OF RATER: /2 EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide S 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: 2 q Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists): 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: / 5J SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Proiect Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Proiect Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall a proach to project. 2 SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are f� none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: P5 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: 1- ) - 0 % NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: / `D na N i L L NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SQQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. S 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. S 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. 5 SUBTOTAL: 2 h Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists), S 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. S SUBTOTAL: (,� SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. -s 3 Overall apparent project management ability. s SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program S described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Z 0 Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F- TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: v2 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: /--)— O ~% NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: p H 2, NAME OF RATER: I1� EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). "I 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. J SUBTOTAL: 0 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: / 5� I4 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within bud et. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. S SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: t SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: %' C9 CZ NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: �3 u� cJ Or <'� O w c �( NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 5- 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. S 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. s SUBTOTAL: Z g Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. S 3 Overall resource availability. S SUBTOTAL: SUM MERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall a parent project management ability. -S SUBTOTAL: / Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, S adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. S 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F— I TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: O (� v SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: /- S e' NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: re-, r1z 4 ?<t /-J ;/ u-c NAME OF RATER: /z L_ S EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. L% 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. 2 SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. s SUBTOTAL: l 3 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. S 3 SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program S' described? 4 Overall approach to project. "l l 8 SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or r5 DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: 73 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: / 6—c % NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: PA C C— NAME OF RATER: X11 EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SQQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles re uired for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on L� this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. 5- SUBTOTAL: 1 Z�4 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). S 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: % SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within bud et. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described?)) 4 Overall a proach to project. I "1 SUBTOTAL: G1 Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. U F- TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: sw SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on 3 this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: 5� Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — aJANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Proiect Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.) 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program (,f described?)2 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F— I TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: W SUM MERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: I 7 — d % NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: J44 ,-7 "7 oW0 C-000/ U IVA,9& NAME OF RATER: %q EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SQQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles re uired for this project. s- 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. q 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 3 Overall a parent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: 1 Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: �3 Special Considerations: City of Renton's Shining Stars! 1 P4 2 �� M.r•v rim 04) �v1 j6>ky ADD S O 4 u'% n U Tj L I C t'rP "Z `v 6r'6al www.rentonwa.gov SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: 113/0-7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: lJp,4 gL NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. `J 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. S 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide S 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). S 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. s SUBTOTAL: 30 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 3 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. S SUBTOTAL: oZ- No SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. s 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. S 3 Overall apparent project management ability. S SUBTOTAL: / S Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, s adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. S 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. s SUBTOTAL: / Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F- TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: W-1 f SUM MERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SQQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 5 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. S 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide S 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). S 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. S SUBTOTAL: ,j t:> Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of staff. S 3 -key Overall resource availability. s SUBTOTAL: 5 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Proiect Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. S 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. S SUBTOTAL: - !s Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. S SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or c7 DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F— I �� TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: [— EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. "bonuses" 4 Special skills or the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). S/ 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. 2L?I SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists): 5w- 2 Time availability of key staff. Y 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: l� SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: �1( Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform S' quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall a proach to project. r SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or v DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F- TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: 1 -77 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: /� S b 7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:r7�d/ `— NAME OF RATER: (� EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. S 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. S 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles s required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide y 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on f this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). S 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. T SUBTOTAL: 3 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. y 3 Overall apparent project management ability. S SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, S adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? S 4 Overall approach to project. ' SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown.F- C7 I TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: �� SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: .Z -e 10 7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:, r NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SQQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles �! required for this project. l 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 5, 2 Time availability of key staff. ZK 3 Overall resource availability. `3 SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within Lj budget. �( S 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall a parent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. S 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program r described? f 4 Overall approach to project. J SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or O DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: '7 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: L3 %t /i NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 7 3 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton 3 standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 3 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists)._ l 3 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. 3 /0 SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. _( 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: / Proiect Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.)/ / 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform L/ quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program (( described? 4 Overall approach to project. % SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F- TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: SUM MERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: l/ 7 A> 7 NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: c- NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SQQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. "bonuses" 4 Special skills or the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 3 1 Overall resource availability. 3 SUBTOTAL: l L-,-- `/ SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. J 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: l P Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? Overall a proach to project. t� t SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. g TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: / /,- l p-7 / J NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:e,2 NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. "bonuses" 0- 4 Special skills or the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. 3 SUBTOTAL: G s Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 02 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: cl SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. oz. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. 3 SUBTOTAL: 1 7 Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Cl Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or (� DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F— I TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: . 51 L SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: / L - (i — NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: �a i+ice f�r-Lis�=n1 EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 A licable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed.-� 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles re uired for this project. 4 S ecial skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). rl 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm'sfTeam's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists), > 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. > SUBTOTAL: It. SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. =� 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Z1` Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 4- 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. i SUBTOTAL: / Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: ' -I SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: / G — 2,- 1 - e% j, NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: -T—E A c NAME OF RATER: �.� �•„, e;?<,�if EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 A licable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. ~� 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 S ecial skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide `t 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). `j-- 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. -� SUBTOTAL: -77 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists)- 2 Time availability of key staff. j 3 Overall resource availability. << SUBTOTAL SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within bud et. , 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability, SUBTOTAL: f " Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, ade uate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program - described?) 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: J Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: 7r1 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:�i / NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on , this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. 1 SUBTOTAL: t " Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. % SUBTOTAL: L.19 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Em hasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described?) , 4 Overall approach to project. l SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or c , DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: Z_� 4P SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: /Z — 21�:, (%�© NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: f���L✓/� it�.� ��h�i��-I�ZL. NAME OF RATER: tli����.t,1 EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide > 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 5 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. ' SUBTOTAL: - Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. i 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. — 3 Overall apparent project management ability. r SUBTOTAL: i Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, ade uate field and background research, etc.) 2 Em hasis on communication with client. J 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. 't SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or i DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. ` TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: (__ # 46 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: S - Z l - c,&: NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. ` �- 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. t 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. j 4 S ecial skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: - Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). f 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: 1 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. `/- 3 Overall apparent project management ability. f SUBTOTAL: I Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.)"t a 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described?)r/ 4 Overall approach to project. / SUBTOTAL. - Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. ` TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: Is SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: / Z - ` %I - C 455, NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: %�C•//��� NAME OF RATER: �J! Hi✓ �7Oi45e�.! EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 A licable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. ' 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles re uired for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 1 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: j Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. /f SUBTOTAL: j SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Proiect Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. f I r 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. L�— SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, ade uate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: % "- Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). C. 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: (. I SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: / Z CC G (c' NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: f:J% C NAME OF RATER: \_Jt111AJ EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. j 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles re wired for this project. 4 S ecial skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability, SUBTOTAL: 1 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Protect Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within bud et. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. > 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Protect Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.)F 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. C' [TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — aJANUARY 2007 — EVALUATION DATE: /Z'2�-F NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: C, 14 s NAME OF RATER EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. -- 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. ' l- 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles re uired for this project. 4 S ecial skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). '. 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL. Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within bud et. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, ade uate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). �. 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. [--TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: `1:?, NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:,�� NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may provide- 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: 2 Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 5 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. 13 SUBTOTAL: C> SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. _F SUBTOTAL: L Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, ade uate field and background research, etc.)—� 2 Em hasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL. - Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are L none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. U TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: `7 k SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - ANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: j NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:LCstl NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SQQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. J "1 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. "bonuses" 2 4 Special skills or the firm or team may rovide / 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). C� 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. Ct SUBTOTAL: 1, Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within j _Z1 budget. `I 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: 2- Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.),C� 2 Em hasis on communication with client. ` 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program 1� described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. �� TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: � SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION--JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: .14 t� NAME OF RATER:�� EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOO / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. t'' 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. `" f 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: 1 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, L ade uate field and background research, etc. 2 Em hasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or Y Cf DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown.F- s I TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: i;� SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — .JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION / DATE: TL1ti%�z NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: &"-57 NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOO / proposal. - Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. L 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 S ecial skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 3 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Z� Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists) . 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. 4 SUBTOTAL: l `z SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: -T Proiect Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, ade uate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? i 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: l" Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are 4 none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or C> DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. �% TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION / DATE: r' 11 -c l�id� 1 _� j Z NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:�L-r�re,-, NAME OF RATER. - EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. ;- 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. `7 "bonuses" J 4 S ecial skills or the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects-, knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. r 3 1 Overall resource availability, SUBTOTAL: 2 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Proiect Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within / bud et. `2 i 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. C SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.)1 L{ 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program L described?)� 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are �J none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. E:: I TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: `% SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER:�tja, EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project- "bonuses" 4 Special skills or the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on /r this item). `T 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Z� Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 4 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 1 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within bud et. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. C= SUBTOTAL: l Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: 7�(/� SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — .JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: `-f � _�Mi�t�� H , NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM:7r NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOO / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 S ecial skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Ovorall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: 2` Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. `% F-/f2 SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.)`i 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall a proach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of pre ious categories (if there are none, enter a 2). LIJI'-.LEI 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F- I TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — .JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: ; t{ NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOO / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. `7 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on �r- this item). i 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. G 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: ` Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall approach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or C^ DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F- TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: - SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists) . 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Proiect Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Proiect Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, ade uate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall a proach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: PLANNING/BUILDING/ a% + PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT + 6 �NIV M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 13, 2006 TO: Rich Marshall Ron Shaffer Oscar Cantu Malcolm Thomson2gate FROM: �hrSUBJECT: Summerwind/StoLift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor SOQ/RFP Review Gentleman, Attached please find proposals from consultants for the Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation project. Please review each proposal and rate each submittal utilizing the rating form provided in this package. I will need your rating forms provided to me by January 3, 2007 in order to rank the firms and decide which firms will move on to an oral interview. I would also like each of you to reserve the date of January 25, 2007. This is the date I have reserved to hold the oral interviews. Thanks you for taking the time out of your busy schedule to assist in this effort. Any questions you may have regarding the process or on the submittals, please contact me at x7212. w:\wwp-27-xxxx summerwind-stonegate Is replacement\rfp\memo to shops.doc N, SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles re wired for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists) . 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: W SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Project Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? Overall a proach to project. t SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: 13 Live search- Microsoft Internet Explorer J File Edit View FIvorites Tools t* 4, Back - ASearch of Favorites aMeda j IN J Address http:illocal.live.com ->Go Links Web Images News Maps QnA More - Welcome Collections w Driving directions Traffic Locate me Share- � Print w 2D 3D RAMP - eie d6e- -1Z b LIV 1 141111 I 1.1,111SM 111IFF", 14 y. FRJP Virtual Earth" — -1 7W or v., r "brut I Help I Fa-db4 4C Done 0 Internet RECEIVED Nov 0 7 2005 CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON UTILITY SYSTEMS Request for SOOs and Proposals Design of City of Renton Sumerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Submittal Date: December 12, 2006 The City of Renton is soliciting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) and Proposals from qualified consultants to design the Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor and to provide consulting services during its construction. After the proposals have been evaluated, the highest ranked firms will be interviewed. Selection shall be based upon both the written SOQs & proposals and interviews. All firms submitting qualification and proposals will be notified in writing as to their status upon completion of the process. Women and Minority Business Enterprises (WMBE) are encouraged to submit qualifications and proposals. To obtain a copy of the Request for SOQ's/Proposals, consultant selection evaluation criteria, and instructions for preparing and submitting SOQs and proposals, or answers to questions, please contact David Christensen at: Wastewater Utility Engineering Section, City of Renton, 5"h Floor, City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055; phone: 425-430-7212; fax: 425- 430-7241; e-mail: dchristen &ci.renton.wa.us. Five (5) copies of the SOQs and proposals may be mailed or delivered to the following address: City of Renton, Attn: SOQ / Proposal — Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Design, 6 h Floor Customer Service Center, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. The deadline for submittals is 4:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 12, 2006. If mailed, the submittal must be postmarked no later than December 12, 2006. • �' Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Published: Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce November 9`h and 16f', 2006 CITY OF RENTON Request for SOOs and Proposals Design of City of Renton Sumerwind/Stonegafe Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Submittal Date: December 12, 2006 The City of Renton is soliciting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) and Proposals from qualified consultants to design the Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor and to provide consulting services during its construction. After the proposals have been evaluated, the highest ranked firms will be interviewed. Selection shall be based upon both the written SOQs & proposals and interviews. All firms submitting qualification and proposals will be notified in writing as to their status upon completion of the process. Women and Minority Business Enterprises (WMBE) are encouraged to submit qualifications and proposals. To obtain a copy of the Request for SOQ's/Proposals, consultant selection evaluation criteria, and instructions for preparing and submitting SOQs and proposals, or answers to questions, please contact David Christensen at: Wastewater Utility Engineering Section, City of Renton, 5'h Floor, City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055; phone: 425-430-7212; fax: 425- 430-7241; e-mail: dchristen@Dci.renton.wa.us. Five (5) copies of the SOQs and proposals may be mailed or delivered to the following address: City of Renton, Attn: SOQ / Proposal — Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Design, 6"' Floor Customer Service Center, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. The deadline for submittals is 4:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 12, 2006. If mailed, the submittal must be postmarked no later than December 12, 2006. Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk Published: Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce November 9"' and 16`h, 2006 REQUEST FOR SOQs / PROPOSALS FOR Design of City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor including consulting services during construction The City of Renton, Wastewater Utility Section, as part of its 2007 Capital Improvement program, has identified a project to provide ultimate sanitary sewer capacity needs within its upper May Creek/Honey Creek Subbasins. The project was originally identified as part of the Sunset Interceptor Phase III project during alternative design analysis. The goal of this project is to provide sufficient build -out capacity within the portions of the existing system that are currently served by the Summerwind and Stonegate Lift Stations. The City has identified a base alternative as a starting point for the scoping of this project. A map is attached showing the initial proposed alignment. One aspect of this work effort will be a full alternatives analysis where all viable options for meeting the ultimate capacity needs will be evaluated. Other general background information regarding the City's municipal codes and policies, permitting processes, etc is available on-line at: h1tp:A1www.c1.renton.wa.us/ hqp://ww�v.rentonmark-et.com/, and http://www.mrse.org/nxt/gatew-ay.dll?f=templates&fn=mtnpage.htm$vid=municodes:renton. The City plans to design the combined lift station and interceptor using the services of a design consultant in 2007 and to begin construction in 2008. OUTLINE OF SCOPE OF WORK The City of Renton requires engineering services for: Alternatives analysis a. Determine options available to meet capacity needs for ultimate service area for both lift station service areas b. Provide planning level cost estimates for each alternative c. Prepare draft and final report with alternatives discussed and planning level costs included, with recommended option. 2. Design of the project a. Develop survey base maps for use of design plans for project b. Participate in meeting between City and neighbors to discuss construction activity issues c. Geotechnical evaluation of route to determine construction related soil issues d. 30% design plans and outline of technical specifications, preliminary construction cost estimate e. 60% design plans and preliminary technical specifications, preliminary construction cost estimate Request for SOQ / Proposal for Design of City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor f. 95% design plans and final technical specifications, construction schedule, Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost with detailed breakdown of costs organized by Bid Item 3. Preparation of Bidding Documents a. Finalize design drawings and specifications b. Prepare the bidding documents, including plans, specifications, bid schedule, and finalized Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost with detailed breakdown of costs organized by Bid Item 4. Permitting and Project Approval Assistance a. Various information and drawings to support a SEPA checklist, site approval plan, steep slope variances or other permits required for project b. Geotechnical engineer's report with soils borings to accompany any permits requiring soils data c. Submit plans and specs to King County for approval 5. Assistance during bidding a. Attend pre -bid site visit b. Respond to bidders' questions c. Prepare addenda 6. Services during construction a. On -site Construction Progress Assistance i. Pre -construction activies ii. Field engineering assistance iii. Special construction progress observations and reviews iv. Field geotechnical observation and engineering support v. Verification surveying support vi. Project acceptance assistance b. Engineering Support i. Submittals reviews ii. Responses to RFIs iii. Assistance with change orders c. Start-up and initial operations assistance d. Record Drawings e. O & M Manual 7. Coordination and Management Interested consultants must submit a statement of qualifications / proposal as outlined below. CONSULTANT SELECTION AND EVALUATION PROCESS The City of Renton staff and representatives will evaluate the consultants' statements of qualifications / proposals based on the project .approach, each firm's technical skills and resources, project team's technical skills, history of performance, and knowledge. After the statements of qualifications / proposals have been evaluated, the highest ranked firms will be interviewed. All firms submitting statements of qualifications / proposals will be notified in writing as to their status in the selection process. Attached are copies of the evaluation criteria that will be used in determining the short list of firms to be interviewed and the evaluation criteria used for the interviews. Final selection will be made based upon both the written statements of qualifications / proposals and the interviews. Page 2 of 4 Request for SOQ / Proposal for Design of City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED IN SOQs / PROPOSALS To be considered responsive, SOQs / proposals must include the following information. SOQs / proposals that do not fully comply with these instructions may not be considered. To facilitate evaluation, SOQs / proposals should be organized in the order of the outline below. Do not exceed 15 pages, exclusive of resumes. A. PROJECT APPROACH 1. Discuss specific tasks to be included in the Scope of Work and describe the proposed approach to complete each task as follows: TASK No. TITLE RATIONALE: ACTION OUTLINE (TASK OBJECTIVE): TASK LEAD (Person on Consultant's team): 2. Provide a preliminary time schedule for carrying out various tasks. 3. Prepare time estimates for staff members used in each of the major tasks. B. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Provide a description of your approach to organize and carry out the work. 2. Provide an organizational chart indicating how the firm's management will interface with this project. C. PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS Describe the expertise for each proposed team member and indicate their role in this project. For your firm, include Puget Sound office locations, technical expertise, and other pertinent information. 2. Include descriptions of four projects that your firm has completed that are related to the proposed project. Describe the work that your firm's assigned staff members completed on these projects. 3. Identify subconsultants that you will use on this project, indicate their specific role(s), and outline their experience on similar related projects. D. REFERENCES 1. Provide three recent references that may be contacted concerning your firm's performance on a project of this type. 2. Provide three recent references that may be contacted concerning the performance of your firm's proposed Project Manager on projects of this type Page 3 of 4 Request for SOQ / Proposal for Design of City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor 3. Provide a professional resume for each key member of the proposed team E. INSURANCE, RECORDKEEPING, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS The firm that is selected for this project will be required to obtain, at its own expense, professional liability insurance of $1,000,000 for the term of the contract and other insurance as required. Indicate if you can meet this requirement. F. TIME SCHEDULE Statements of Qualifications / Proposals should be developed with the following schedule in mind: A. Five (5) copies of the SOQs and proposals may be mailed or delivered to the following address: City of Renton, Attn: SOQ / Proposal — Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation and Field Avenue Interceptor Design, 6th Floor Customer Service Center, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. The deadline for submittals is 4:00 p.m., Tuesday, December 12, 2006. If mailed, the submittal must be postmarked no later than December 12, 2006. B. Interviews will be held in the Renton City Hall and will be scheduled after the short list is determined. G. CONTACT PERSON All questions regarding this request should be addressed to David Christensen, Wastewater Utility, City of Renton, 51h Floor, City Hall, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055; phone: 425-430-7212; fax: 425-430-7241; e-mail: dchristen!u�.ci.renton.wa.us. Page 4 of 4 SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION - JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: EVALUATION OF WRITTEN SOQ / PROPOSAL Review the firm's Statement of Qualifications / Proposal, and evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the SOQ / proposal: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm: 1 Applicable work experience, particularly within last 5 years. 2 Technical experience of staff proposed. 3 Demonstrated knowledge of planning and engineering principles required for this project. 4 Special skills or "bonuses" the firm or team may rovide 5 Quality of work on previous Renton projects; knowledge of Renton standards (if you know of no previous work for Renton, score a 2 on this item). 6 Overall qualifications and expertise of firm. SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Technical materials, specialists(including location of specialists). 2 Time availability of key staff. 3 Overall resource availability. SUBTOTAL: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION Protect Management: 1 Experience indicates that consultant produces on time and within budget. 2 Structure of team compatible with City, easy to work with. 3 Overall apparent project management ability. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project is compatible with City practices (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of project into tasks and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc. 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control practices (do senior engineers perform quality checks, is there an adequate quality control program described? 4 Overall a proach to project. SUBTOTAL: Special Considerations: 1 Special qualifications outside of previous categories (if there are none, enter a 2). 2 Affirmative action, enter a 1 if the firm is a registered MBE, WBE, or DBE firm, and a 0 if not, or if unknown. F— TOTAL SCORE, WRITTEN PORTION: SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION DATE: NAME OF APPLICANT/FIRM: NAME OF RATER: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION Evaluate the following elements, based upon the scoring system described below. Use the following scoring while evaluating each aspect of the oral presentation: Inadequate = 1, Acceptable = 2, Good = 3, Excellent = 4, Outstanding = 5 KeV Personnel Skills and Abilities 1 Judgment and insight. 2 Technical skills and knowledge. 3 Leadership. 4 Communication skills(listening andspeaking). 5 Overall skills and abilities of key ersonnel SUBTOTAL Qualifications and Expertise of the Firm / Team: 1 Applicable work experience demonstrated and discussed. 2 Demonstrated technical experience of staff proposed, (familiarity & ex erience with methodologies, technologies). 3 Knowledge of regulatory environment (SEPA, ESA, existing & pending SDWA rules, pertinent RCW & WAC, King County SWM and others). 4 Knowledge of outside funding sources (grants, loans, LID's, ULID's, etc.) If knowledge of funding sources is appropriate to this category and is demonstrated by applicant, score a 2; otherwise score a 0. 5 Interest in work, willingness to accommodate the City. 6 Project experience matches Cit 's needs. 7 Overall qualifications and expertise of the firm / team SUMMERWIND/STONEGATE LIFT STATION CONSOLIDATION AND FIELD AVENEUE INTERCEPTOR DESIGN CONSULTANT EVALUATION — JANUARY 2007 - EVALUATION SUBTOTAL: Firm's/Team's Resource Availability: 1 Confirmed time availability of key staff proposed. 2 Key proposed staff appear to be easy to work with. 3 Other, and overall resource availability of firm / team SUBTOTAL: Project Management: 1 Appropriate experience and expertise of project manager. 2 Team has worked together before. 3 Structure of team seems easy to work with, capable of working with City staff. 4 Overall apparent project management capabilities. SUBTOTAL: Project Approach: 1 Approach to project compatible with City practice (preparation of scope of work, breakdown of tasks into goals and milestones, adequate field and background research, etc.). 2 Emphasis on communication with client. 3 Adequacy of quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) program re ularlperformed by a senior engineer with the firm? 4 Overall pro'ect approach SUBTOTAL: TOTAL SCORE, ORAL PRESENTATION: 11 Renton --- Renton City Limits ❑ Parcels Renton Aerial N SCALE 1 : 923 50 0 50 100 150 FEET http://rentonnet.org/MapGuide/maps/Parcel.mwf Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:24 AM City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Larry Amans, PE Project Manager — Pipeline Design Lead Larry has over 30 years of experience in planning, design, preparation Education: of plans and specifications, and construction management for a wide BS, Civil Engineering, variety of civil engineering projects, concentrating mainly on utility Oregon State University designs for sewage, water, and drainage systems. Registration: South Lake Washington Sewer System Improvements, City of Professional Engineer, Washington, California Renton, WA — Lead designer responsible for providing design and coordination for the public utilities required to serve the existing 280- Notable Accomplishments: acre Boeing site planned for redevelopment. BHC designed the new Over 3o years of experience public sewer collection facilities required for the redevelopment area. in the design utility System improvements included approximately 5,000 feet of 8-inch to infrastructure projects. p 15-inch sewer and appurtenances and connection to the existing 96- inch Metro sewer interceptor pipeline. Additional design elements Successfully delivered more included 16,000 feet of 12- to 60-inch storm drains, 10,000 feet of 12- than 30 projects in the last inch water mains, and 9,000 feet of detailed joint trench layouts. We 10 years, including three municipal utility projects also provided coordination assistance between the City, franchise completed in the last year. utilities, Boeing, the developer, and the design team. Rockaway Beach Sewage Pump Station, Bainbridge Island, WA — Project manager for the design of a 130 gpm submersible pump station. Hydraulic modeling software was used to determine discharge flow rates when pumping against another pump station on the common discharge line, and to find peak inflow rates after a power outage, when the grinder pumps from all 70 connected homes attempt to pump at the same time. A standby generator and SCADA system were part of the electrical improvements. Odor control facilities were designed, consisting of a granular activated carbon filter followed by a bio-filter containing wood chips and compost. Sunday Cove Sewage Pump Station, Bainbridge Island, WA — Project manager for study and design of upgrades to existing sewage pump station to address flow increases, pump cycling times, and control upgrades. Design elements included an additional wet well for the drywell pumps, a "pump -around" connection, impressed current cathodic protection system, new control panel with full telemetry outputs, and replacement valves and pump seals. 1st Street Sewer Improvements, City of Sultan, WA — Engineer for the design of 2,900 feet of 18-inch sewer, 12-inch storm drain, and 8- and 12-inch water lines in Sultan, WA. All pipes are in existing City streets and replace aging or undersized infrastructure. Pipes had to be positioned to maintain existing pipes in service, and to provide minimum water and sewer pipe separation distances. State Route (SR) 20 Sewer and Water Relocation, Washington State Parks and City of Oak Harbor, Deception Pass State Park, WA — Project manager for the design of 2,000 feet of 6-inch sewer force main, and 2,000 feet of 24-inch and 16-inch water main along SR 20 near Deception Pass. WSDOT plans to lower the highway by up to 10 feet in this area, which necessitates the relocation of the utilities. Resumes of Key Personnel :I M0 E& CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Larry Amans, PE Page 2 Staged construction was specified to mesh with the concurrent highway construction, and to keep sewer and water downtime to an absolute minimum. Evaluations of main replacement alternatives included directional drilling and cut -and -cover methods. Sewer Interceptor Construction Support, Redmond, WA — Provided construction support services for five miles of sewer interceptors for Redmond Ridge, a new 4,000 unit development by Quadrant. Sewers in city and county roads ranged from 18-inch open cut to 36-inch microtunnel. Highway 305 Pump Station, City of Bainbridge Island, WA — Project manager for the study and design of upgrades to the City's main pump station serving the downtown area. Replacements and additions include three new 25 hp pumps, a "pump around" connection, new valves, additional wetwell, sewer air valve, new control panel with telemetry interface, and impressed current cathodic protection system. Wastewater Conceptual Engineering Study for Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe, Port Angeles, WA — Designer and author of a preliminary design study for a new sewage collection and disposal system to serve 370 homes at buildout. Disposal alternatives studied included an onsite treatment plant, onsite drainfield, and a lift station with a 2-mile-long force main. The recommended treatment process was a membrane bioreactor (MBR) unit. A preliminary layout of all piping was provided for the 8-acre site. Fort Ord Lift Station, Monterey, CA — Project manager for the design of a 350 gpm sewage lift station with two submersible pumps in an eight -foot diameter wetwell. The project also included 3,000 feet of 6- inch force main and two special off -gas scrubbing stations to remove hydrogen sulfide gas from the wetwell and discharge manhole. Marina Area Storm Drain Pump Station, City of Benicia, CA — Project manager for design of a storm drain pump station with submersible pumps to replace a temporary one built by the City of Benicia. The new pump station will be built over an existing 66-inch storm drain, which was cut out to receive the new cast -in -place concrete structure. An overflow weir, equipped with removable aluminum stoplogs to vary the overflow elevation, was designed to permit high flows to exit the pump station through twin 48-inch pipelines. Sewage Lift Station, Austin, TX — Project manager for the design of a 50 mgd lift station with a three-story concrete/CMU building, and 4,000 feet of force main. Special project features included a surge tank, corrosion control, and landscaping to compliment the station's color scheme. ■ Resumes of Key Personnel ■ [ON CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Gary Bourne, PE Principal -in -Charge, Public Involvement Lead Gary Bourne has over 30 years of experience in the design, Education: management, and administration of public works facilities. He is also Civil Engineering, University skilled in grant writing, leading public involvement efforts, making of Washington presentations to councils and boards, and assisting clients with funding Registration: allocations and permitting. Gary's broad knowledge and experience Professional Engineer, allows him to work with municipal clients as a senior engineer, Washington representing their interests and guiding their development. Quote: He has distinguished himself among colleagues and clients alike for his "Gary was real professional. I attention to technical excellence and client service. The long-standing liked the way he came across professional relationships that he has developed throughout his career in our neighborhood meetings... are evidence of his ability to consistently deliver projects that are I also liked the idea that Gary successful and meet client expectations. gave us his cell phone number, so he was easy to reach. I Sanitary Sewer System Expansion, City of Lake Forest Park, WA — never heard of that before. Gary was always clear and Gary is providing public involvement services for this sewer system concise when he went in front expansion project providing service to approximately 230 un-sewered of the public. He was always properties. The City secured a Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) loan willing to take questions from to connect the non-sewered properties, at the request of residents. The the audience, never knowing first phase of the project focused on the design, permitting and what he was going to get... he construction of sewers to serve approximately 70 properties. A is quick on his feet." combination of grinder pump and gravity systems was selected. Julie Schulte Approximately 3,500 LF of 2-inch low pressure sewer main was Citizen Advisory Council Bainbridge Island South. Island designed and will be constructed, along with approximately 2,000 LF of Sewer System LID 8-inch gravity sewer main. Gary is currently providing project management and public involvement services for Phase II which will provide sewer service to approximately 150 properties. Bainbridge Island South Island Sewer System LID, City of Bainbridge Island, WA — BHC provided LID formation assistance, design and construction services for the City of Bainbridge Island's South Island Sewer System. This project provided sanitary sewers to 220 homes in four neighborhoods and an elementary school in an area with 71 documented (DOH) septic system failures. The septic failures impact a sensitive wetland or flow directly into Puget Sound in the sensitive Blakely Harbor. The Project included providing on -site sewer facilities and related service connections, collection and conveyance piping, pump stations, and connection to the existing sewage treatment plant. There are 220 residential lots or approximately 500 people in the project service area. As principal -in -charge, Gary took the lead in presenting project information to Citizens Advisory Council, neighborhood groups, and to the City Council. Consulting City Engineering Services, City of Sultan, WA — As the Consulting City Engineer, Gary was responsible for the assessment of infrastructure needs of the City and developing water, wastewater, and transportation master plans and programs to address identified shortcomings. Programmatic and project funding needs were identified and financing sought from State and City sources. He consulted with the City in selection of the design consultant and oversaw their Resumes of Key Personnel _3 [ON CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Gary Bourne, PE Page 2 contracts and progress, as well as the subsequent construction of improvements. Extensive interaction with the City Council on policy matters and with City Administration on implementation was required. Consulting City Engineering Services, City of Oak Harbor, WA — As the acting City Engineer, Gary identified water and sewer needs for the City and worked with the City Council and City Administrator to develop funding sources for projects to address these shortcomings. He also worked with the City to prepare price competitive proposals to operate and manage existing water and wastewater facilities on adjacent military bases, thereby expanding the City's revenue base and area of influence. In the course of this consultation, new development standards and procedures for requiring municipal contributions from the development community were conceived. Roadways, water line extensions, and sewer service extensions were also made under Gary's guidance. Wagley's Creek LID Sewer Extension, City of Sultan, WA — Program manager for first Local Improvement District (LID) project in the City in the last 30 years. The $4 million project has a combination of funding grants from EDA, Rural Development, and the Forest Service, supplemented by am LID. Major engineering challenges included negotiating with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries, EPA, and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife to obtain a JARPA permit for the installation of a new 15- to 18-inch interceptor along salmon -bearing Wagley's Creek. Utility Local Improvement Districts (ULID) Projects, Southwest Suburban Sewer District, King County, WA — Project manager for approximately 20 ULID projects in the District. Responsibilities included ULID management, project development, cost estimates, design drawings, and construction administration. Projects included eight -inch collectors, interceptors up to 48-inches in diameter, and major pump stations. ■ Resumes of Key Personnel CON: I o [on City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue lnterceptor Craig Chambers, PE Quality Control Craig has more than 30 years of experience in the design, construction, Education: and management of wastewater, stormwater, and water projects. Craig MS, Civil Engineering, has successfully evaluated, designed, and provided construction University of Washington services more than 60 wastewater projects. This experience includes BS, Civil Engineering, ten wastewater treatment plants, 22 pump stations and pipelines Oregon State University projects (including grinder pumps, vacuum sewers, and traditional gravity collection systems), and 1/1 reduction projects under the King Registration: County program. Professional Engineer, Washington Rockaway Beach Pump Station, City of Bainbridge Island, WA — Notable Accomplishments: Principal engineer/QA/QC officer for the design of a 130 gpm Craig has successfully submersible pump station at Rockaway Beach on Bainbridge Island, as evaluated, designed, and a part of the South Island Sewer LID. Hydraulic modeling software was provided quality control and used to determine discharge flow rates when pumping against another construction services more pump station on the common discharge line, and to find peak inflow than 60 wastewater projects rates after a power outage, when the grinder pumps from all 70 "1 appreciate the overview connected homes attempt to pump at the same time. that you [Craig Chambers] provided to keep the project Bainbridge Island South Island Sewer System LID, City of moving forward and to keep Bainbridge Island, WA — Project manager for LID formation tight controls on the costs. assistance, design and construction services for the City of Bainbridge We felt that you always had Island's South Island Sewer System. This project provided sanitary the City's interest at heart and were diligent in sewers to 220 homes in four neighborhoods and an elementary school minimizing change orders in an area with 71 documented (DOH) septic system failures. The and financial impacts to the septic failures impact a sensitive wetland or flow directly into Puget rate payers." Sound in the sensitive Blakely Harbor. The Project included providing Tom McKerlick, City of on -site sewer facilities and related service connections, collection and Bainbridge Island, South conveyance piping, pump stations, and connection to the existing Island Sewer System LID sewage treatment plant. There are 220 residential lots or approximately 500 people in the project service area. Influent and Effluent Pump Stations, City of Monroe, WA — Project manager and senior engineer responsible for the comprehensive planning, engineering, design, and construction management of Phase I and II improvements of the secondary treatment plant. In addition to the treatment elements, Craig had lead responsibility for the design and construction management of the new effluent and influent pump stations and associated odor control and emergency generator support. Recent October 2003 flooding and rainfall events resulted in historically high peak flows that exceeded 7.8 mgd. 175th Street Bypass Sewer, Woodinville Water District, Woodinville, WA — The existing 10-inch interceptor along 175th Street in Woodinville had reached its hydraulic capacity. Repeatedly this line would surcharge and occasionally backup. 175th Street in Woodinville is the main arterial through the central business district of the city. Digging up this line and replacing it would be extremely disruptive to the businesses along that street. Consideration was also given to pipe bursting, but the large number of side sewers would similarly result in disruption to traffic and business activities. The recommended route Resumes of Key Personnel .3 no E& CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Craig Chambers, PE Page 2 involved intercepting upstream flow and directing it away from the business district. Coordination with pending developments resulted in a joint benefit to both the parties. Construction involved 1200 If of 10-inch pipe and a railroad boring. Pump Station No. 7, Kitsap County, WA — Project manager/QA/QC officer for the analysis, siting, and design of new pump station No. 7 for Kitsap County. Current and future flow projections were determined and compared to the maximum capacity of the existing station, utilizing flow calibration against actual field flow measurements. The new pump station will meet the long-term needs of the areas growing population, with the capability to pump peak flows of more than 2,200 gpm. Pump Station Inventory and Evaluation, Bainbridge Island, WA — QA/QC officer for the inventory and evaluation of the City's 13 pump stations, Least -cost solutions for identified modifications and standardization was also provided. Auburn Valley Interceptor Projects, City of Auburn, WA — Project manager for LID formation, design, and construction engineering services for interceptor sewers, as follows: LID 310: 2,500 feet of 30- to 42-inch interceptor; 170 feet of 8-to 12-inch collectors; 2 crossings of Mill Creek LID 314: 3,000 feet of 30- to 36-inch; 1300 feet of 18-inch; 2,900 feet of 12-inch; 2 crossings of Mill Creek; 1 jacked highway crossing of SR 18 LID 318: 3,350 feet of 21-inch interceptor; 250 feet of 10-to 18-inch pipe, 2 jacked railroad crossings; pump station abandonment LID 330: 1,270 feet of 12-inch; 1 jacked crossing of SR 167 Pay'N Save: 1,450 feet of 12-inch; 1 jacked railroad crossing; 1 jacked crossing of SR 167 King County Ill Project, King County, WA — Served as a Local Area Manager for the $30 million Regional 1/1 Reduction Program. LAM responsibilities included: • Liaison with several north sewering agencies in northern King and southern Snohomish Counties. • Selection of pilot projects to investigate the effectiveness of various 1/1 removal techniques • Provided QA/QC control for all 1/1 design documents • Workshop involvement throughout the five year course of the work k ) Resumes of Key Personnel ^■ City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Ron Dorn, PE Pump Station Design Lead Ron Dorn has over 25 years of engineering experience involving Education: wastewater and water pump station design, wastewater treatment BS, Civil Engineering, projects, computer modeling and system planning, hydraulic analysis, University of Washington transient analysis, reservoir sizing and design, and water treatment and Registration: distribution. Professional Engineer, Sewage Pump Station K3, Snoqualmie, WA — Project manager Washington responsible for field reconnaissance, development of design Ron's experience includes: alternatives, plans and specifications, permitting, coordination of 43 wastewater pump approvals by the City of Snoqualmie and Department of Ecology, and stations construction management. The pump station includes: 23-HP Flygt submersible pumps (with startup wet well mixing attachment) in precast 25 water pump stations wet well; below grade valve vault with check valves, shutoff valves, and 13 water reservoirs a pig -launch facility; an above grade CMU building housing a natural 19 water system planning gas -fired emergency generator, electrical panels, sound attenuation projects (including ducts, and Bioxide feed equipment; together with associated site work hydraulic analysis) and paving. 27 transient analysis Lift Station No. 8 Replacement, City of Lynnwood, WA — Project projects manager for preliminary design analysis including site evaluation and 15 miscellaneous water selection, force main route evaluation and selection, preliminary system projects structure design, research and selection of non -clog sewage pumps, surge analysis, selection of surge control facilities, design, preparation of plans and specification, and construction engineering services. The new station will be replacing an existing station that periodically exceeds its design capacity and is deficient with respect to safety and maintenance access. The project includes: replacement of the lift station with a triplex lift station with a 1,250 gpm design capacity; a trench -type wet well to ease cleaning procedures; an above grade building with a hoist, office, and electrical panels; and exterior diesel generator in a custom sound attenuation enclosure; odor control facilities; 2,400 lineal feet of 10-inch ductile iron force main; about 800 lineal feet of replace 15-inch gravity sewer; and associated site landscaping and paving. Pump Station Rehabilitation, West Lake Sammamish Associates, WA — Project manager for revision of plans and specifications, construction engineering services, and development of an electronic O&M manual. Construction engineering includes review of project data submittals, periodic inspection of construction, responding to contractor and city requests for information, start-up and testing, and preparation of record drawings. The O&M manual includes documentation of existing features, operations, and maintenance activities for existing water and wastewater facilities in a web -formatted manual with links to photographs, record drawings, routine operational procedures, and general maintenance activities. Pump Station Nos. 56 and 57, Quadrant Corporation, City of Redmond, WA — Project manager for preliminary design, surge analysis, development of design report, development of plans and specifications, obtained King County building permit, and managed Resumes of Key Personnel _3 [IN CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Ron Dorn, PE Page 2 construction engineering services. PS-56 is a wet well/dry well station with a capacity of about 365 gpm. Pumps are 60 hp with flywheels for surge protection. Station includes liquid phase odor control, emergency power generation, and bypass connections to the force main. Extensive retaining walls were required due to close proximity to golf course and residential properties. PS-57 is a submersible station with a capacity of about 210 gpm. Pumps are 15 hp. Station has emergency power generation in a custom designed sound attenuation enclosure and a bypass connection to the force main. Retaining walls were necessary due to close proximity to Native Growth Protection Area. Sewer Lift Station 4 Rehabilitation, Phase 2, Redmond, WA — Project manager responsible for data acquisition, field-testing, coordination with homeowner's association, evaluation of alternatives, development of plans and specifications, and construction engineering assistance for a new lift station. Pump Station No. 54, Quadrant Corporation, City of Redmond, WA — Developed plans and specifications, obtained King County building permits, and managed construction engineering services. Station is a wet well/dry well station with a capacity of about 450 gpm. Pumps are 75 hp with flywheels for surge protection. Stations include liquid phase odor control, emergency power generation, and bypass connections for the force main. Pump Stations No. 52 and 53, Quadrant Corporation, City of Redmond, WA — Developed plans and specifications, obtained King County building permits, and managed construction engineering services. Stations are wet well/dry well stations with capacities of about 550 to 600 gpm. Stations include vapor phase and liquid phase odor control, emergency power generation, and bypass connections for the force main. Pump Station No. 55, Quadrant Corporation, City of Redmond, WA — Prepared preliminary design, surge analysis, development of design report, development of plans and specifications, obtained King County building permit, and managed construction engineering services. Station is a submersible station with a capacity of about 250 gpm. Pumps are 10 hp with an HDPE force main for surge control. Station has emergency power generation in a custom sound attenuation enclosure and bypass connection to the force main. Dakin-Yew Pump Station, City of Bellingham, WA — Developed design, pump selection, piping layout, project management, development of plans and specifications, and construction management for the pump station, reservoir pipelines, and chemical feed. Balsam Lane Pump Station Upgrades, City of Bellingham, WA — Project manager for the equipment selection, design, plans and specifications, and project data review for four larger in -line pumps, larger emergency generator, and higher capacity ventilation system. ■ Resumes of Key Personnel '3 ■ C& CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Jim Lutz, PE, SE Structural Engineer Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Jim Lutz has 38 years of experience, specializing in the structural Education: design of water and wastewater infrastructure. His project experience ME, Structural Engineering, includes a spectrum of involvement in more than 300 municipal and University of New South private projects ranging from feasibility studies and cost estimating Whales through design and construction management. BS, Civil Engineering, St. Louis University Trilogy Sewage Pump Station 57, Quadrant Corporation, Redmond, WA — Designed overhanging traffic slab on submersible Registration: pump station. Slab on grade analysis. Redesign for building code Professional Civil Engineer, Washington change to IBC, station relocation and groundwater changes. Structural Engineer, Trilogy Sewage Pump Stations 56, Quadrant Corporation, Washington Redmond, WA — Design of a 22-foot-deep underground wet Continuing Education: well/drywell structure and an above grade masonry equipment building for a 360-gpm wastewater pumping station (IBC2003 design in high Design Steel Your Way With seismic area), 341-square-foot pump station footprint, 653-square-foot the RISC 2005 Specification AISC Seminar, 2006 equipment building, and emergency generator foundation. ACI 318-05 Structural Snoqualmie Ridge Sewage Pump Stations Z and K2, Snoqualmie, Building Code, ACI Seminar, 2005 WA — Participated in design of two 13' x 14' masonry buildings for housing electrical controls and emergency generator. Structural Masonry Design — Transitioning to the New Redmond Ridge 97th Street and Business Park Wastewater IBC, NCMA Seminar, 2005 Pumping Stations, Quadrant Corporation, Redmond, WA — Tunneling in the Pacific Designed equipment buildings and 35-foot-deep underground pumping Northwest, ASCE Seminar, stations for 580- and 535-gpm pumping stations serving portions of a 2005 large housing development. Equipment buildings were 322-square-foot Seattle Fault Scenario masonry with wood roofs and included emergency generator Conference, Cascadia foundations. Pumping stations were a combination of precast and cast- Region Earthquake Workshop, 2005 in -place concrete construction. Seismic Design of Liquid Trilogy Development Pump Stations 54 & 55, Quadrant Containing Structures, ACI Corporation, Redmond, WA — Structural design of two wastewater Seminar, 2004 pumping stations. Stainless Steel Metallurgy, American Welding Society Spanaway Bypass Sewer, Pierce County, WA — Evaluated materials Seminar, 2004 and designed polyethylene profile pipe sewers to 96-inches in diameter Structural Design in for approximately 3 miles of pipe in high groundwater conditions. Accordance with the 2003 IBC, WABO Education McAllister Springs Pump Station and Pipeline Evaluation, Olympia, Institute Seminar, 2004 WA — Project manager for seismic structural evaluation of 19.6-million- 2003 IBC Overview, WABO gallon pump station and eight miles of 36-inch concrete and steel water Education Institute Seminar, transmission main. Performed hydraulic calculations to assess vacuum 2004 and cavitation risk due to pipeline rupture. ACI 318-02 Structural Building Code, ACI Seminar, Dakin-Yew Pump Station, City of Bellingham, WA — Structural 2002 designer for a two-story underground water pumping station. Designed Seismic Evaluation and concrete outlet structure from existing clearwell structure. Structural Rehabilitation of Buildings, design of two 30,000-lb soda ash silos and building modifications to SEAW Seminar, 2002 permit installation. Resumes of Key Personnel CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Jim Lutz, PE Page 2 Quinalt Indian Resort, Ocean Shores, WA — Structural designer for 900-square-foot masonry wall/timber roof fire and domestic water pumping station. Liguan Terrace/Barrigada Heights, Guam — Conducted design review, capacity analysis for 5-mgd wastewater pumping station. Stormwater Pumping Station, Birmingham Steel, Seattle, WA — Developed the structural design of stormwater pumping station. 1040 Pump Station, Snoqualmie Ridge, WA — Structural design of concrete and masonry building, cranes and equipment supports for water pumping station. Pump Station Nos. 7 and 10, Lakehaven Utility District, Federal Way, WA — Designed structural modifications to reinforced concrete roof slabs to allow hatch additions. Southern Link Sewage Pump Station, Guam — Building analysis and design of modifications, new vaults for upgrade of 5-mgd facility. Henderson Avenue Pipeline, Olympia, WA — Structural designer of 42-inch HDPE storm sewer, tiedowns and pavement. Provided alternate designs for 36-inch ductile iron and fiberglass. Cowiche Canyon Canal Siphon, Yakima County, WA — Performed hydraulic assessment of replacement section for an existing 48-inch wood stave pipeline to allow vertical realignment at stream and road crossing. Evaluated replacement with parallel lines to reduce profile. Calibrated existing valley crossing by siphon. Arlington Wastewater Treatment Plant, Arlington, WA — Structural design of headworks, post -tensioned concrete treatment tanks, and support buildings for 4.0-mgd, sequencing batch reactor (SBR) wastewater treatment facility. SBR's were multi -cell, rectangular tanks, 300 feet long. Designed without expansion or contraction joints using partial prestressing and expansive concrete closure strips for crack control. Upper level sidewalks designed as horizontal beams with steel ties across the tanks for more efficient resistance to hydrostatic loads. UBC Seismic Zone 3. ') E Resumes of Key Personnel ^ ) ■ City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station John Frech, PE Pump Station Design Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor John Frech has 13 years of experience in civil and environmental Education: engineering. His primary focus has been the design of water, MS, Civil Engineering, wastewater, stormwater, and solid waste projects. He has also provided Stanford University engineering services during construction and general civil engineering BS, Civil Engineering, plan review in addition to construction staking for utilities, stormwater, University of Washington and wastewater treatment plant projects. Registration: East Lynden Sewer System, Lynden, WA — John provided civil Professional Engineer, Washington engineering support for the final design of the East Lynden Sewer System facilities that consist of a new regional pump station, 6,200 feet Notable Accomplishments: of 12-inch force main and approximately 3,500 feet of 8-inch to 12-inch Experience designing interceptor. The pump station is a triplex pumping system with 45 wastewater pump stations horsepower submersible pumps, a standby generator and odor control and pipeline projects. facilities. The facilities were designed on an accelerated schedule to Routinely provides meet commitments made by the City of Lynden for developer engineering services during connections to the sewer system. John also provided engineering construction. services during construction. Experienced in handling the South Island Sewer System LID, City of Bainbridge Island, WA — Community's concerns related to construction of John prepared the plans and specifications and provided on -site utility projects. construction services for this sewer system project. This project added sanitary sewers to 220 homes in four neighborhoods and an elementary school in an area with 71 documented Department of Health (DOH) septic system failures. John coordinated site details with homeowners and fielded concerns and requests during the design process. He worked with homeowners to locate sewer stubs for gravity lines and force main collection boxes for grinder pump services. Key issues of the site coordination included: . Avoiding other utilities and maintaining required separation between water and sewer . Providing adequate depth for gravity sewer service . Designing installations to avoid removing trees, key landscaping, or damaging paved areas . Designing installations to minimize impact to retaining walls In addition to these tasks, John handled the community's concerns related to the construction of the project and proved he was capable of effectively relating to the general public in a truthful and effective manner. In fielding concerns, John would meet with friendly and sometimes not so friendly home and business owners to gain a better understanding of their concerns and to provide them someone to communicate with. Understanding the person's concerns, John would then forge an agreement with the Contractor to mitigate the problem. Pump Stations and Forcemain Design, King County, WA — Lead design engineer for duplex and triplex submersible pump stations and corresponding forcemains at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill. The forcemains involved 8-inch and 16-inch HDPE pipelines, designed to be resistant to possible significant settlement that may occur in a landfill setting and to the corrosive effects of landfill leachate. Resumes of Key Personnel �^ t City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor John Frech, PE Page 2 Pump Station and Force Main Design, Snohomish County, WA — Project engineer for the design of a duplex submersible stormwater pump station for the Southwest Recycling and Transfer Station expansion. The peak pumping rate required for the pump station was estimated using the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method. The pump station is coupled to a 6-inch, HDPE forcemain that conveys the stormwater collected throughout the property to a sedimentation facility. Leachate Pump Station, King County, WA — John led the design and developed the specifications for the Area 5 leachate pump station at the Cedar Hills Regional Landfill. The pump station, a 950 gallon per minute submersible duplex system, is designed to provide redundant capability to meet pumping demands, to be easily serviced, and to minimize the harsh corrosive effects of leachate. To provide pumping redundancy, the pump station has two pumps that can match anticipated peak flows, a connection for an emergency generator incorporated into the electrical panel, and a bypass connection in the forcemain to allow the use of temporary pumps. To improve operator ease in pump station servicing, the design incorporated quick removing submersible pumps, large access hatches, and large valve vaults. Corrosion resistance is achieved through careful and attentive selection of materials and coatings for the pumps, pipe, valves and hardware. Gravity Sewer Interceptor Design, City of Ferndale, WA — Project engineer responsible for the construction review of a gravity sewage trunk interceptor, including review of the contractor's pipe and material submittals and key construction methods. The reinforced concrete interceptor ranges from 24-to 48-inches in diameter, for an approximate length of 4000 linear feet. The interceptor is aligned within an urban setting, in areas of high groundwater and fine sediment deposits common to river flood plains and glacier outwash. In the course of this installation, attention was given to groundwater conditions, the concurrent street restoration overlay, utility conflicts and stormwater conveyance. Leachate Pump Station Refurbishment, King County, WA — Project engineer responsible for the design of improvements for the refurbishment of a pump station at the Vashon Landfill. The work including providing methods to clean, reline, and seal a cracked wetwell; identifying requirements needed to upgrade the pump station's control system; and planning repair methods for a cracked forcemain. Resumes of Key Personnel ^) ■ City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Erika Schuyler, PE Project Engineer - Conveyance Erika Schuyler has over six years of experience in civil and Education: environmental engineering. Erika has participated in the development BS, Civil Engineering, of pipeline plans and specifications, quantity take -offs, cost estimates, Washington State University sewer and water comprehensive plans, system analyses, permitting, project coordination, field analysis and assessment, processes and Registration: systems, and conceptual modeling. Erika has worked with the proposed Professional Engineer, Washington BHC in-house team on wastewater projects for the Cities of Lynden, Lake Forest Park, North Bend, and Kitsap County. In addition, she Notable Accomplishments: provided engineering support on the Denny Way CSO project for the Two time recipient of the City of Seattle. Erika's select project experience includes: Lacey V. Murrow Civil Engineering Scholarship Sanitary Sewer System Expansion, City of Lake Forest Park, WA — Erika is providing civil engineering design and services during construction for this sewer system expansion project providing service to approximately 230 un-sewered properties. The City secured a Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) loan to connect the non-sewered properties, the first phase of which focused on the design, permitting and construction of sewers to serve approximately 70 properties. A combination of grinder pump and gravity systems was selected. Approximately 3,500 LF of 2-inch low pressure sewer main was designed along with approximately 2,000 LF of 8-inch gravity sewer main. She is currently providing preliminary engineering services for Phase II which will provide sewer service to approximately 150 properties. East Lynden Sewer System, Lynden, WA — Erika provided civil engineering support for the final design of the East Lynden Sewer System facilities that consist of a new regional pump station, 6,200 feet of 12-inch force main and approximately 3,500 feet of 8-inch to 12-inch interceptor. The pump station is a triplex pumping system with 45 horsepower submersible pumps, a standby generator and odor control facilities. The facilities were designed on an accelerated schedule to meet commitments made by the City of Lynden for developer connections to the sewer system. Highway 305 Pump Station Buildout Analysis, City of Bainbridge Island, WA — Erika authored a study that projected sewer flows at the buildout phase for the downtown Bainbridge Island area. City Planning Department population estimates for the core area were added to estimates of future population on undeveloped parcels. These parcels were identified and quantified by reviewing aerial photos. Resulting dry weather flows at buildout were then adjusted for peaking factors and infiltration/inflow influences to arrive at peak flows to the pump station. Pump Station No. 7, Kitsap County, WA — Erika provided civil engineering support and services during construction for the analysis, siting, design, and construction of a new pump station #7 for Kitsap County. Current and future flow projections were determined and compared to the maximum capacity of the existing station, utilizing flow 7 I. [�M Resumes of Key Personnel ■ City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate oft Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Erika Schuyler, PE Page 2 calibration against actual field flow measurements. The new pump station will meet the long-term needs of the areas growing population, with the capability to pump peak flows of more than 2,200 gpm. North Bend Phase IIC Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements - 3W water system, North Bend, WA — Erika provided engineering support services for the IIC improvements to the City's WWTP. The City of North Bend was using tremendous volumes of potable City water for their day to day operation of the WWTP. Water for the secondary clarifier spray nozzles and maintenance washdown resulted in tens of thousands of dollars every year. This financial burden coupled with the fact that North Bend was over extracting water permitted by the water rights prompted the City to initiate Phase IIC improvements to their WWTP. These improvements involved the use of disinfected secondary effluent for the washdown and spray by the installation of high pressure pumps, pneumatic tank and self-cleaning filter. This system has been installed for about 10 months and the City is anticipating the costs savings will offset the cost of the improvements within two years. North Wagley's Creek Waterline Extension, City of Sultan, WA — Erika provided engineering and related services for a city water line extension project. The project included preliminary design of approximately 7,200 feet of new 12-inch water line and appurtenances, special benefit analysis, and public involvement. Denny Way/Elliott West CSO Project, Marine Outfall Project, and South Lake Union Pipelines Project, King County Department of Natural Resources, King County, WA — Erika provided design services, review of project submittals, and coordinated subcontractor involvement. Denny Way/Elliott West Pipelines Project, King County Department of Natural Resources, King County, WA. As Project Engineer, Erika provided design services, review of project submittals, and coordinated subcontractor involvement. ICI Water Conservation Program, City of Auburn, WA. As Staff Engineer, Erika performed water audits of several ICI water customers, including review and evaluation of water consumption histories, on -site inspections, data evaluation, development of conservation recommendations, and report preparation. ■ Resumes of Key Personnel ■ [on CONSULTANTS City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Gregory S. Harry, AIA Project Architect Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Greg has over 23 years experience in municipal and industrial Education: architecture including wastewater treatment plants, pump stations, Bachelor of Design in operations and crew facilities, solid waste facilities, maintenance Architecture facilities and administration buildings. Greg is highly experienced with University of Florida, 1981 all stages of the design process including site planning, public (Magna Cum Laude) involvement process, design and development of construction documents, permitting, and construction. Over the past five years, Greg Masters of Architecture has been involved with eight WTP or WWTP projects for local University of Washington, municipalities. 1983 Education Hill Pump Station, City of Redmond, WA Registration: Project Architect who provided site planning and design of a single story Architect, State of concrete masonry building with a hip metal roof and glass bock Washington, 1995 windows for obscure lighting. In addition to housing the pumps, the Architect, State of Maryland, building housed an emergency power generator and an overhead crane 2003 rail system. This project was sited and reviewed for contextual fit within a residential and school neighborhood. Architect, State of Oregon, 1997 Fulmer Field Corrosion Control / Water Treatment Facility Architect, State of Florida, City of Auburn, WA 1988 Project Architect responsible for site planning and the design of a National Council of 6,000-sf water treatment plant building with stripping towers located in a Architectural conspicuous and aesthetically critical location within a public park. Registration Boards Certification (NARCB) Grand Mound Wastewater Treatment Plant, Thurston County, WA Project Architect responsible for space planning. design, and Notable Accomplishments: development of several buildings in conjunction with a new 1.1-mgd American Institute of wastewater processing plant and vacuum sewer system. The buildings Architects (AIA) include a 2,500-sf multi -level concrete masonry operations building The Solid Waste Association containing a laboratory, control room, lunch room, laundry room, of North America (SWANA) restrooms, and a vacuum station room. Other support buildings include a 1,600-sf maintenance building including a maintenance shop, an equipment room, a hazardous chemical room, and a remote 1,200-sf vacuum station building. Arlington Water Treatment Plant/Haller Park Well Field Improvements City of Arlington, WA Project Architect responsible for the design of a 6,000-sf water treatment plant building, and two (2) separate well house buildings. Services included plans, specifications, and design and construction administration responsibility. Everett Water Pollution Control Facility Administration/Maintenance Building City of Everett, WA Project Architect who assisted the City of Everett with building programming, space planning, building code analysis, and architectural design of a 33,000-sf combined equipment maintenance/administrative support building located at the City's water pollution control facility. The two-story building efficiently integrates administrative office areas, parts Resumes of Key Personnel KPG City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Gregory S. Harry, AIA Rage 2 storage, and staff showers and locker rooms, with various wastewater treatment plant equipment repair and service areas. Greg also played a key role in siting and configuring the new facility within the confines of the existing treatment plant including the re -alignment of access roadways. Monroe WWTP, City of Monroe, WA As Principal Architect, Greg was responsible for the architectural construction documents and construction administration services. He assisted the City of Monroe and the environmental engineering firm of EarthTech with building programming, space planning, building code analysis, and architectural design of an expansion to the existing plant operations building, retrofit of emergency generator, new 1,200-sf maintenance facilities building, and expansion of an existing sludge dewatering and sludge loading building. This work is being performed and coordinated in conjunction with a plant -wide expansion for increased capacity and odor control measures. Resumes of Key Personnel KPGF° City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Paul Fuesel, ASLA Landscape Architect/Urban Designer Paul has over 17 years experience as Landscape Architect, Urban Education: Designer and Project Manager for public works facilities. His BA, Environmental Biology responsibilities have included site planning, aesthetic treatments, visual St. Mary's University, impact analysis, site landscape design, and property restoration. Project Minnesota, 1984 types include municipal buildings, pump stations, transfer stations, landfills, water reservoirs, shops facilities and utility projects. He has MLA, University of Illinois, extensive experience with landscape and irrigation design as well as 1989 visual graphics and presentations, including free hand sketches, PhotoShop imaging and AutoCAD modeling. Paul has extensive Registration: experience with over a hundred community involvement meetings, Landscape Architect workshops and Citizen Advisory Committee meetings. State of Washington, 1994 American Society of 263rd Overcrossing, City of Maple Valley, WA Landscape Architects, 1992 Project Landscape Architect and Urban Designer responsible for providing conceptual design, architecture/aesthetic detailing, and street Notable Accomplishments or edge landscaping for this project, under subcontract to BHC Quotes: Consultants. Aesthetic detailing included the use of manufactured stone N/A with a custom granite facing, the bridge's architectural profile, the bridge railing and cap. The project connects east and west across the Lake Wilderness trail, in the Four Corners area of the city. Somerset Pump Station, City of Bellevue, WA Project Landscape Architect responsible for the conceptual development and PS&E of the landscape components for a 200-hp potable water pump station located in a residential neighborhood. Work included conceptual alternatives for building aesthetics to fit into a residential area, community presentations, and landscape restoration. Fulmer Field Corrosion Control / Water Treatment Facility City of Auburn, WA Project Landscape Architect for this corrosion control facility located next to an active public park. Work included visual impact analysis, conceptual design alternatives, landscape restoration, and material/color selection to make the facility blend in with the park and be a compatible neighbor. Arlington Wastewater Treatment Plant, City of Arlington, WA Project Landscape Architect responsible for providing concept drawings, as well as construction documents for landscape components of this project. Work included entry/gate improvements for the treatment plant upgrade. Enumclaw Transfer & Recycling Station, City of Enumclaw, WA Project Landscape Architect responsible for site planning and landscape restoration of a 20-acre site. The plan included mitigation of views and noise through landscape buffering, and site circulation enhancement. The facility comprises of five separate buildings: scalehouse, operations building, public facility, canopy, and transfer station totaling nearly 60,000-sf under roof. The facility was designed as the prototype for future transfer/recycling stations in King County. Resumes of Key Personnel KPG City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Paul Fuesel, ASLA Page 2 Ketchikan Reservoir Tanks, City of Ketchikan, AK Project Landscape Architect responsible for providing concept drawings, as well as construction documents for the architectural and landscape components of this project. Work included visual impact analysis, conceptual design alternatives, and landscape restoration for two reservoir tanks in Ketchikan. Cedar Hills Reservoir, King County, WA Project Landscape Architect for alternative aesthetic considerations for neighborhood mitigation of visual impact of 85-ft high, 1.5M gallon, steel reservoir. Airport Road Recycle & Transfer Station, Snohomish County, WA Project Landscape Architect for EIS technical reports on landscape design, and visual impact assessment for two proposed sites. Work included extensive code and policy analysis, landscape plans and visual graphics depicting 'before and after' scenarios for a Transfer Station facility which contains four (4) pit scales, two (2) scalehouses and one (1) scale booth. Resumes of Key Personnel KPG'0 City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Tim Wickham, PLS Lead Surveyor Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Tim has over 25 years of experience providing land surveying services Education: throughout the Puget Sound Region. His experience includes N/A completing topographic surveys in support of general engineering design through data collection, right-of-way locations and preparation of Registration: digital terrain models for design of civil engineering facilities in PLS, State of Washington Washington. Memberships: City of Lynnwood, Lift Station No. 8 Replacement, Lynnwood, WA Land Surveyors Association of Washington, South Puget Project manager for topographic mapping and right-of-way mapping for Sound Chapter new sewage lift station and approximately 2,400 LF of force main and 1,900 LF of gravity sewers. Reviewed topographic base maps of the lift station site and associated legal descriptions. Coordinated all survey work for the City's design consultant, BHC Consultants. Pump Stations Nos. 2 and 13, City of Edmonds, WA Project manager for topographic mapping and right-of-way mapping for new sewage pump station Nos. 2 and 13 which included the existing and proposed sites, force main routes and gravity sewer routes. Reviewed topographic base maps of the pump station site and associated legal descriptions. Provided boundary determination of adjacent parcels and right-of-way for SR 104. Coordinated all survey work for the City's design consultant, BHC Consultants. Pump Station No. 7, Kitsap County, WA Project manager for topographic mapping and right-of-way mapping for sewage pump station No. 7 and approximately 900 LF of force main. Provided as -built information of the existing pump station and associated appurtenances. Reviewed topographic base maps of the lift station site and associated legal descriptions. Coordinated all survey work for the City's design consultant, BHC Consultants. City of Federal Way, Pacific Highway South Phase II & III, Federal Way, WA Survey project manager for topographic mapping and right-of-way determination for 2.3 miles of Pacific Highway South. Reviewed all right-of-way plans and legal descriptions for right-of-way acquisition. Coordinated all survey work with the city's design consultant. Earth Tech was sub -consultant to design consultant. Fort Lewis, Survey Mapping, Pierce County, WA Tim directed various survey mapping projects. City of Federal Way, Street Improvements, Federal Way, WA Project manager for topographic mapping and right-of-way determi- nation for 0.5 miles of South 288th Street. Prepared right-of-way plans and legal descriptions for right-of-way acquisition. Coordinated the work with the city's design consultant. Resumes of Key Personnel KPG City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Tim Wickham, PLS Page 2 Washington Department of Transportation, SR 2 - MP 32.99 to MP 35.21, WA Project manager for providing survey data in metric raw data file format using current WSDOT class codes and methodologies (coordinate points and point numbers) and completing a three-dimensional map model. Collected data including roadway centerline, fogline, edge of pavement, wetland flagging, bridges, guardrails and all utilities above ground at 20m intervals. Conducted a Roadside Clear Zone Inventory and Sign Inventory and updated the WSDOT inventory disk. Prepared a traffic control plan. (1997, $38,000 feel Washington Department of Transportation, SR 5 - Stillaquamish River Bridge to Joe Leary Slough, WA Project manager for providing data to complete a three-dimensional map model of 15 various locations along SR-5. The data collection of ground points at 15m intervals in metric CEAL (civil engineering analog language) format, through a closed level loop using WSDOT supplied GPS points, was downloaded at the WSDOT project survey office. The metric three-dimensional topography used State Plane NAD 83/91 horizontal coordinates. Coordinated with the state project office and survey representatives. Pierce College, Site Mapping, Puyallup, WA Tim directed topographical site mapping for construction of new campus. Resumes of Key Personnel K��`0 City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Gerry Gerhardt, P.E. Senior Electrical Engineer Gerry Gerhardt is a Senior Electrical Engineer with over 35 years of Education experience in design, project management, field construction Northwest Nazarene College administration and quality control. He has been involved in numerous Engineering Studies wastewater and water pump station projects in the Pacific Northwest Yakima Valley College and has extensive knowledge of the electrical and instrumentation and Engineering Studies control systems that these facilities utilize. He has served as a senior electrical engineer and project manager on over 200 projects. His Kings Vocational Bible capabilities include lighting, low-, medium-, and high -voltage power Institute distribution systems, load analysis, instrumentation and controls, Three Year Diploma SCADA, communications infrastructure, code compliance, preparation of contract documents, and construction assistance. Gerry also Edison Technical School - regularly participates in value engineering studies, value assessments Airframe and Powerplant and constructability reviews. License Rockaway Beach Wastewater Pump Station, City of Bainbridge Grays Harbor Community College Island, WA EIT Preparation Senior electrical engineers responsible for the design of a new wastewater pump station for the City of Bainbridge Island, under University Of Washington subcontract to BHC Consultants. Design included power, standby P.E. Preparation power, lighting and controls. Professional Registration Sunday Cove Wastewater Pump Station, City of Bainbridge Island, Electrical Engineer, WA Washington Provided electrical engineering services for upgrade of the Sunday Cove sewage lift station for the City of Bainbridge Island under subcontract to BHC Consultants. This included a new outdoor MCC with integral SCADA system designed to communicate with the existing city wide control and monitoring system plus upgrades to all normal service and standby generator wiring. Highway 305 Wastewater Pump Station Upgrades, City of Bainbridge Island, WA Senior electrical engineer responsible for upgrades to the pump station, primarily a new control panel with connections to the existing drywell pumps. Work is being performed under subcontract to BHC Consultants. Swinomish Northern Lights Casino WWTP, Anacortes,WA Senior electrical engineer responsible for the electrical and I &C design of a new Envirodyne package WWTP and associated lift stations for the Swinomish Tribal Community at their existing Casino/Hotel site in Anacortes. The package WWTP will be used to treat wastewater from the new hotel and casino. Project is in final stages of design. Indian Health Services, Taholah Wastewater Treatment Plant, Taholah, WA Electrical and instrumentation and control (I&C) design for a new wastewater treatment plant on the Quinalt Indian Reservation in Taholah, Washington. Electrical design consists of a new 1800' medium -voltage primary underground electrical service from PUD No Resumes of Key Personnel McGOWAN BROZ E N G I N F E R S City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Gerry Gerhardt, P.E. Page 2 of Grays Harbor County, a new step-down 112.5kVA service padmount transformer, standby generator with fuel storage, lighting, and fire alarm design. I&C design is being provided for a complete plant Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) System consisting of a single touchscreen human -machine interface (HMI) terminal, Plant Control Panel (PCP) and plant instrumentation. The new plant has a winter average daily flow of 200,000 gallons and 170,000 gallons in the summer. This new project is in the preliminary design stage. City of Yelm, Wastewater Treatment Plant and Water Reuse Facilities, Yelm, WA Electrical design and construction administration services for this new (1.36 MGD) wastewater treatment and reclamation facility. Thurston County, County Fairgrounds, Sewer Improvements, Thurston County, WA Lead electrical engineer for new service at this public fairground facility. The project required new electrical service and pump controls for improvements to the sewer system. The project also included exterior lighting and site distribution of power from an overhead system. King County Water District #49, Reservoir Motor Control Center Retrofit, King County, WA Lead electrical engineer for the retrofit work at this existing motor control center. The project involved reconfiguring the existing motor control center starters and overloads, and installation of new capacitors for two new pumps. Design work also included miscellaneous upgrade of wiring and pump controls, and associated testing during construction. King County Water District #20 Pump Station Upgrade and Conversion, King County, WA Senior electrical engineer for the pump station upgrade of electrical services and the conversion of three (250 HP) pumps from constant speed to variable frequency drives. The project also included miscellaneous electrical power and lighting upgrades as well as new service from Seattle City Light. Resumes of Key Personnel McGOWAN BROZ E N G I N E E R S City of Renton Summerwinci/Stonegate Lift Station Katie L. Walter, PWS Permitting Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Katie Walter is a senior biologist and botanist with over 16 years of experience permitting for large complex multi -jurisdictional projects. She has provided extensive support to municipal and government clients working directly with several agencies. Katie has developed mitigation plans, performed botanical surveys, conducted function and values assessments, developed conceptual and final mitigation plans, performed regulatory review, managed permitting, and provided construction oversight for numerous projects throughout King and Pierce Counties. Some of Katie's selected projects include: Sewer Line Upgrade, City of Umatilla, Umatilla, OR. Katie served as biologist for completion of a Biological Assessment completed in Umatilla for a proposed sewer line upgrade. She completed a habitat inventory for potential threatened and endangered species of concerns within the proposed development area. The inventory covered more than 10 miles of additional right of way, several areas adjacent to the existing facility, as well as a crossing involving the Umatilla and Columbia rivers. Both plants and animals were addressed. The final report included an in-depth assessment of the habitats and potential for use by species of concern. Recommendations for avoidance of impacts to species of concern were made. The final report was reviewed and accepted by the federal agencies involved. Tacoma Narrows Bridge, WSDOT, Pierce County, WA. Katie served as permitting specialist for the in -water geotechnical borings for the new Tacoma Narrows Bridge. She developed the application submittal package to obtain permits for the in -water field explorations. Permit applications were made to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Pierce County, and the City of Tacoma. Permit application and acquisition was fast track, in order to work during the optimal fieldwork season and state fisheries closure windows. She assisted with the research and documentation for the Biological Evaluation required for concurrence from both National Marine Fisheries Service and US Fish and Wildlife Service. She also assisted with the responses to agency requests for information and preparation of testimony during the shoreline appeals. All the federal, state and local permits and exemptions were obtained in record time. Des Moines Guest Moorage Expansion Project and Master Plan; Des Moines, WA. As the environmental Project Manager, Katie provided guidance to the design team allowing creative resolution to challenges associated with habitat impacts. We facilitated regulatory review working with representatives from the Corps, Ecology, WDFW, USFWS, NMFS, and the City of Des Moines, and obtained early input that allowed a higher level of permitting certainty to design challenges. The advantage of this early communication is cost -savings to the design team and the opportunity for input from the regulatory agency representatives early in the design process. Education: B.A., Botany, University of Washington, Seattle, WA Registration: Certified Professional Wetland Scientist, Society of Wetland Scientists Notable Accomplishments: Katie's technical expertise in mitigation design and applied ecological concepts has helped clients plan for expected permit requirements, implement permittable project designs, and meet project schedules. Resumes of Key Personnel ���� SHANNON6WI,I..SON.INC. N City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Katie L. Walter, PWS Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Permitting for Marysville Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades and Effluent Pipeline, City of Marysville, Marysville, WA. Permitting specialist, obtained permits required for preliminary exploration of the sewer line route between treatment facilities in Marysville and Everett, involving geotechnical borings in Steamboat and Union Sloughs and adjacent wetlands. Prepared the Joint Aquatics Resources Permit Application (JARPA) for submittal to eight agencies. The BE evaluated impacts on Puget Sound Chinook salmon, bull trout, bald eagle and other species. Coordinated activities with WDOE to determine the need for a Water Quality Certificate for the borings, and worked with local agencies to determine permit requirements or exemptions under their Shoreline Master Program requirements. Aberdeen Industrial Water Supply Line, Aberdeen WA. As permit coordinator, Katie completed both a SEPA checklist and JARPA addressing in -water geotechnical borings and the environmental impacts to Elliot Slough in Grays Harbor County. She obtained a SEPA exemption from Grays Harbor County, a hydraulic project approval (HPA) from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Corps 404 nationwide permit. Comprehensive Stream/Riparian Conservation and Restoration Plan, City of Mount Vernon, WA. Katie was a project biologist for Phases One and Two of this effort. Phase One included streams and riparian areas in north Mount Vernon, while Phase Two included City of Marysville sewer line upgrade and replacement, to begin in August 2000, and includes streams in south Mount Vernon and riparian area along the Skagit River. As permit coordinator, Katie oversaw completion of a Biological Assessment and made application for federal, state, and local permits to complete overwater and land explorations for siting sewer pipelines. The project received approval from WDFW, Corps, WDNR, the cities of Everett and Marysville, and Snohomish County. Obtaining all the permits required skilled negotiation to ensure they were received in a timely fashion so that all fisheries work windows could be accommodated. The explorations were completed in time to provide recommendations for final design. The purpose of the study is to develop a comprehensive planning element that identifies stream/riparian habitat and outlines measures to conserve and enhance these critical areas. This study will eventually be included in an amendment to the City's Growth Management Act and will assist the city's planning staff in directing growth and community and economic development, while protecting streams and their habitat forming processes within the city and the urban growth areas. Page 2 Resumes of Key Personnel =111 SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Stanley R. Boyle, PhD, PE Geotechnical Engineering Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Dr. Stanley Boyle has 22 years experience in construction and design. Dr. Boyle has evaluated and designed trenched and tunneled pipeline installations, retaining structures, and excavation shoring systems. He has developed recommendations for shoring and dewatering of excavations for trenches, pump stations, and tunnel access shafts; evaluated and developed recommendations for mitigating liquefaction susceptibility of a water pipeline, developed recommendations for staged embankment construction of embankments over weak and compressible soils; and designed embankments constructed of lightweight materials to reduce settlement. Some of Stan's selected projects include: Juanita Sewage Pump Station, King County Department of Natural Resources, Kirkland, WA. Dr. Boyle was the Project Manager and lead geotechnical engineer for geotechnical design of this sewage pump station. For this project, Dr. Boyle leads a team of geotechnical, hydrogeology, and tunneling specialists. The design phase of the project included subsurface explorations, dewatering pumping tests in two aquifers separated by low permeability soil layers, liquefaction analyses, and evaluation of pile foundations and ground improvement alternatives to mitigate settlement and liquefaction. Recommendations were developed for micro -tunneling a 140-foot-long, 78-inch-diameter pipeline through flowing sands; construction of a 60-foot-deep, 80-foot- diameter, secant -pile -shored excavation; temporary shoring for a 32- foot-deep maintenance access hole and jacking/receiving pit; and excavation dewatering. As part of the project, Shannon & Wilson performed a con structability/value engineering review of the project and presented recommendations to significantly reduce project costs. The project is currently under construction. Dr. Boyle is managing Shannon & Wilson's staff providing construction support services for the project and participating in project meetings with the Owner and Contractor. Edmonds Lift Station No. 1, City of Edmonds, Edmonds, WA. Project Manager for exploration and studies to characterize the geologic and geotechnical conditions at the site. Dr. Boyle developed geotechnical recommendations for the proposed Lift Station No. 1, including lateral earth pressures, shoring alternatives, bearing capacity, and excavation and backfill requirements. Low Pressure Area Improvements Project, Alderwood Water and Wastewater District, Alderwood, WA. The Alderwood Water and Wastewater District needed a second water line to supply additional water pressure for an area of the City. Stan evaluated feasibility of proposed alignments and construction alternatives, and assisted in production of the geotechnical report and specifications. Most of the approximately 10,000 foot long water line was installed in trenches. The project included a 110 foot long 24-inch jack and bore crossing under SR-525 and an approximately 50 foot long 12-inch HDPE Horizontal Directional Crossing under environmentally sensitive Swamp Creek. Education: Ph.D., Geotechnical Engineering, University of Washington M.S., Structural Engineering, Carnegie-Mellon University B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Vermont Registration: Registered Professional Civil Engineer: Washington Notable Accomplishments or Quotes: "Everyone brought unique contributions, but I would say you were the MVP for cost reductions and savings. Thank you Stan, very much, for pointing out those very significant excavation and shoring cost issues. I know we came out with a better and less costly design because of your suggestions. " — Ms. Chris Okuda, King County — Regarding the Juanita Pump Station Replacement Project Resumes of Key Personnel �'I) SHI NON6WILWN,INC. 0 EUTE C 11 N I f..: 11_NTAL 1.i City of Renton Summerwind/Stonegate Lift Station Stanley R. Boyle, PhD, PE Consolidation & Field Avenue Interceptor Three Tree Point Water System Improvements, Highline Water District, Burien, WA. Dr. Boyle was project engineer and manager for this water system improvement project to replace aging and undersized pipelines. Dr. Boyle performed geologic reconnaissance, supervised the exploration and laboratory testing program, and prepared recommendations for excavation, pipe bedding and backfill, and horizontal directional drilling of two pipeline segments. Horizontal directional drilling recommendations addressed challenges with drilling 500 feet at shallow depth below private property and drilling 300 feet up a 22 degree slope consisting of sand and gravel. Seattle Public Utilities Tolt No.1 Replacement Phase 3b Geotechnical Investigation, Seattle Public Utilities, Snoqualmie River Valley, WA. Dr. Boyle conducted engineering evaluation of soil conditions for the existing 54-inch-diameter Tolt Pipeline No. 1 where it crosses the Snoqualmie River Valley near Duvall, Washington. The existing water supply pipeline is 5,100 feet long where it crosses the valley. The purpose of this project was to assess the pipeline survivability during a design earthquake, both in its existing condition and after sliplining the portion of the pipeline that crosses the river. We also evaluated alternatives and developed recommendations for improving post -earthquake survivability of the pipeline. We performed liquefaction, lateral spread, and slope stability analyses of river banks where the pipeline crosses the Snoqualmie River, developed recommendations for stone column, jet grout, deep soil mixing, and augercast pile soil modification to improve riverbank stability, evaluated existing pile foundations; and prepared recommendations for trenching, shoring and dewatering. We also developed recommendations for trench excavation and dewatering for replacement of about 4800 feet of existing pipeline where it crosses the valley away from the river crossing. Page 2 Resumes of Key Personnel SFWMPl&WLSON.INQ G EOTECNNIC AI . t! 1N1 141'N MEN I'