Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA89-053 I I -I l'i ZU_o' J 4d� — /I i p- aeillsp. i 1 i ae I-rm. ra , 1 ------- l':-;\-,71------7 p ,v - i-iiiii.2...e,„).'..s.:.-1-vs741,,i's:' l'ir, I- PIi I it F�B�:u I4 �� _ lin:i r_e S I z i I➢' j BSI Milli p I mak _- I I 1 .. a IIp' ,F"I I1.I -- III I ? g r t - I o g I ,I==r1a '1II�� 8 I III 1 I . ; j I�I a ;i` ISrali III ssl - - - III ''I fitia - . . --a h + • — -- — I • --_ I I� ',RICHARD W.PERSON RICHARD W.PERSON `.X g _ Pui vlr-i�r ARCHITECT: .( R� _�I�IN� ARCHITECT Box 156 Rolling Bay,Washington `0 u u Box 156 Ro111ng B.y.Washington 3 ! -p ra-1, WA5HIl.J tr 1 (2061842-211G 18061 s NTON,WA FFIN!1 I4 �12061862.211U 98061 I I - ---- - a -h rr• off+jfi fl 0-7 1 ram' 3`r r_ 1 — .. .t,y� — 'im -. I, 1 -: _ 1 EiiIa el mil 1 I -1 t: _ 1 ,1 f / -_-,..- 1 ) filth 11 M1 \;\ _ mI. t `• 11111114 II� ® I i.k ; i :. ---: > L l 'III' .,0 IIII 11111 inn '''*: X T n A z o � T "1 � 9' '} ; = y a o51 o _ RICHARD W.PERSON 1 1 fORREa TER I RICHARD W.PERSON 00 ��v17p1�� ARCHITECT 3 t3u11_1u6r ARCHITECT Box 156 Rolling Bay•Washington Box 156 Rolling Bay,Washington w RE1.1To1.1,WF6HIN4'LON MO61842416 98061 12Ski T01.7,WAGH1uyToN (2061842.21K. 98061 LA FOR E Esm� D u - � H� co pq.yr�n;ar_ait��gnral '� it�a�nralctrac, � :3'?' 4 c Z \*` Z co O 0 �m � c F- g U a 4 �,0f• = U B'm PROJECT xgaatnvB I _\_....\ \ \ . !� r LLI ) i:t{ mini i 1l4�:ig H This project calls for the development of a B-1 zoned piece of m ]Jy J U property Into a Professional Office Building foruse by l / Nwl 6M�+T' _ Yf \ IliI "wag, 1�'O� r = m Artificial Intelligence,Inc.,and selected tenants. v ig I � = e 4MaTk. .,� yY4� /f' , 0 o J ]he site is generall eloping down co the east with a s /� $j❑ — l' (7' CC — elope at the far eastproperty line. It is undeveloped`°with S.I:. Q ❑ U - �i:ii`A :.'ii: i„%+ iQ O1 � Q U cnbb alder and ° ]o tree inthe Q .7�Iancias'��/� r 1 /11�,N .T...southeast to oa the°sia.t`To°the`no•th parkin >;7\qC�l" I = ;��Amra.�1►\►�•��q0lrr:ai iJ^t•]�_�i•� N I•J!J!ry s i+ arC�C � . g area t' I e". i�. :,�� 4. u QCWIII IIM _*k1i# �n6 Y'.a u. t W i (or ruck corner of campcsy,t the south is a e existing apartment J� 1 I' U Q m RSV-- /r U_ Q building,and at r e strew to to vest issano her A •'Itl I ---r- w Ivv 000OQQQ�`Q�Q QQQoOvve ammo apartment building.OS \9j. ,!C1 m° m The proposed structurewill consist of two noon of same Qu L___ NN y'^ 2 LANI: AI-5 PLAN ik.ea, mZ space over a basement s to be utilised for storage. Minting z -�_-- L D eeeee will be of stucco NLh wood vim boards In sort`tone" •colors. Roofing is toe concrete tale 1n cent cola on the ; I ,T I {Fr visible sloped portion f the roof and a built-up roofing material z y ;� -pG y'L °' O 1,pRAG .XikLe. aY.1 C.C. Ua/JOPT Tee&1O¢4/ie5t;E Z'4Ai..: bYG4nioFC M11FLG,�alL Z o the ft s.ixo rooftop mechanical equipment is anticipated e hebuildingewill have a BVAC system wth ground d ttI Z' //�1�' mounted compressor equipment.°`pump the structure l be S,F F Ar(,� BI j1�K , i-i MP�WM pGY.igiOJ{� rd.UMFNL •ryZ�C Rp'2•voaYml O'-10' .e.1d riaT i. en in the nlenbrl.Poa. J-L I Itll v VV// i N6CAN. A-+F� ill .. Perking for t s Mracwto Lois Q I Q SMPI.L �X1y_e.OCCAGWUS TReE-rOQ-sr-later GLL02: /1{�'GAL.- pg.,..eV•D,GQA694R-G,MA4.teN..'A 3 e praj« wnl e":agar parking ana w r banding I-. Z_ /-� parkins. 'ibis le pmssibl dw to the slope f Ne:ice. v E I I 1 (..1 The doe for the : construction ++f `ry11 Q Y 1V"/hNACL z ral.e Pre.ara5 *nee¢-RAC-AvruaN eetorz. m-7'ds' V/NM 14.49 a, srynne. 111 n Z net 1989 and complete stt n w e in f 1989-90. -� 4 5T Ip 5 0 ` e j GJNIF 4-mazow 3 4Ny: L'•7' 911 c P'NG, V. 3. ibis is an ambitiousto°but°ta`possible and meetsthe I yI //-��M IYA wXO.Lt EV owe eE f Q requirements of the el I a'� l}1(a/mini l d'O/J Pert .yIeee...4 O CLL ~ r a 1L fff O LoeGE F Ge.24.- <•, •kiR[.B R�'T2.o. ' N He44E; (,..U.4=tL, NiarVUA,L/LrriaJy7ri15 6444. II m,,® IL CL LEGAL DESCRIPTION VIUNITf /AAP III, I1 1a91:9� rg?/o2 m /depluiA*Ake.�*".4w-ECN-.09-0 S roe•Ma.,✓/,V4; ARliori. ,M/RlL4,visoa JM,we.cDo5V3riJ 54K.. 6"/02 Lots 2.3,14.and 15 of Block i9,Latimer's lake Park Addition as recorded in ton.S to of i eta at page gRe tetarda of H T INb.eX ® S'/'- xnr. - EveFirP-fYi.J •s/J�e roe•r-a-ae: s r oe. a�s,taq,,a0moe<xu'uf,a4aNuo,4Alasva County,ded Washington.Situate in the City of 3.reco d.ofvgton, �tat�S, L COVE .>41E j �i> MAIh1 F"ILUR- PLAh1 r 1 W64.400E'J &JR1D62 SHeu3 2. C: ILEX, �o/(Af2V, LAuENC7E2, HEATH tT�rG� 2. MITE PLAN /o. UPPii.-r"Dr PLv'J �� ` LAN77�it'e mew 7) etr i ELBVATI4 Y•;Y;1 EVF.�'iP ElJ gnrvNt Q� ♦"CQ- alaeyXN4//O'er 9•Ftem X.'OG. /✓1r f2 `,v/ P. f..1-, . 4)LOJJER rL2. PLA/I ,5 V-1 64 EL.EVA-(I I MAY 19e% - I MAY Mb, R �/A�hIT LAND 10 / 744..4 w o--If2e _ / j r S I . .., r a •. I . t♦t ZofJ.O FL I a nr r •ply_ _ I: 1 /i , • 11 '��., e.9,I, I /.d' I/; F d111 /,I�/JWn11 57�, I I ,�,i U 3P • 1 7. I 11 'I r i ( I i LINo,/r E y I I';i I I I uJ W '-, i I �kJ' LLJ CO m . I Lr' 4Klf Iona T ;i� ; ! a I— g. F > z _ I I 1"'T N I • _I�'1 y- e, II� �w.—ia e I I .� i I i I ! �i °' LoiJ i2 L.VEL. P N -- I.Lr/4a_-I — m ,I d r y wo za = - d ! , \' i numi / Y `; I s _9 1/0 1,121 lobe,•iF 1 ' ' V EP FA•RKIN fl � lli l I . ® I /i ,.I I '.Q Q U m YARWNGT R[B. I STALL _ I U .c a 11... a lJ 1'I i I = N v (le'�1'P � n Praade *T I T, I I . pz ,� a Id``-_\ `� ', , 2�1Fr- bLG6t�iF4t `'�N�'\`• ,.o i �/ t -� M r r S\g e e _ I = sIT� PLAN rx-�I cr.-21 5 Q 5 t- 1 R •PARKII.Vq gem.. 32.v 9rAlth. A4 a°tD`' \\ • 3 (Z� ; PARKINei PPoVIDED,a $4 6TALi'{ v \r W Q, W s r 1• I a T �� N 1 MAY 198o) MT---' .TN1aY t^Se=i • , F 0 : 1::::) . . • 1 c 1-1 11 • 'au ii_, 7aiN 1/40 I w PROJECT NARRATIVE 1 W l ! L L\ IP t-- RI This project calls for the development of a B-1 zoned piece of a . 4. i3: .4.4 property into a Professional Office Building for use by NW 5 + S'Ir' I a) ' Artificial Intelligence, Inc. , and selected tenants. + _ .c - The site is generally sloping down to the east with a steep ' 5 nF U e t - CC 0 a_= slope at the far east property line. It is undeveloped with S.F' s i s • many scrubb alder and poplar trees with one major tree in the 1-0 -.C\) --> ' I L.L. v� N southeast corner of the site. To the north is a parking area ti { • I �' � for a truck rental company, to the south is an existing apartment t '� 1 l i building , and accross the street to the west is another existing )� I I —� - p O apartment building. qJ.:. - �� i S sr 1`-� �� J The proposed structure will consist of two floors of office I-— — — '• ? I space over a basement to be utilized for storage. Building � ' . 1_— 7_ exterior will be of stucco with wood trim boards in "earth tone" + ' ,--_._.__ i - C4 L • - colors. Roofing is to be concrete tile in an accent color on the 41"--1 � ..._ s .._ �o�Y — visible sloped portion of the roof and a built-up roofing material , : : - � .,- on the flat areas. No rooftop mechanical equipment is anticipated III•''•' ` y asthe building will have a heat pump HVAC system with ground 5 p� 1 W � �" "�;T, I mounted compressor equipment. Scale of the structure will be ! I A 1 � l — �y residential in character to blend well in the neighborhood. j J _ APT I ]�1 �i � • Parking for the project will be surface parking and under building � i { I...) tjill I I I ';� parking. This is possible due to the slope of the site. + ._ +� S F. :, I ' (N . The schedule for the project is to start construction in the ______ N W 4 GT B 1 �\ summer of 1989 and complete construction in the winter of 1989-90. ' s Thi1 'H s is an ambitious schedule but is possible and meets the1 S 1 \. requirements of the owner. I IL_ N._ LEGAL DESCRIPTION '� I ,� ,� •: I!! �_ /X w ; Lots 2,3,14, and 15 of Block 19, Latimer's Lake Park Addition ------- --- PLANNING DI�ISIO ��'� as recorded in Volume 18 of Plats at page 63, records of King - (�� CITY OF REP TON .__ County, Washington. Situate in the City of Renton, Washington , 1989 l�.' J • _ 9 C� �..,-ter 1 1 IJ .L;Gz7p- FL& MAY 2 L44N12 .:,A,r1F.:. p..1 -J.) ? eL. \/4.`r I , ---' , . _ l) LoW 5Iz Iz F 1 6) VA—r I Qr--4., MA _ ?) • . , . . - • in m ii 11 iT 2 31 , . . . I T Avpv NOL431:1J0 A110 ' • • . -- NOISI/10 ONINNYld •• T .,..-T % C- 70 +4%lb, . . • g g 6 Z. 7 cri . - ol...9 --17s = 'cracr incii4 10P-N I 71z1Va . 17. = ---2. N 1-1 verlI71-S, d7'V S ' 7=5,-ai 01A•117i ZNki.I 0 t- D k\\ 41Pcrili udyl • _ 1-1 -I-- _ _________ __ .. ____ • AZ 1 • --- .T_ -- •- .1 , . . .-:.:-J.. . •- 1 1 i • . s, - ',......4140..../ , ( \ 8 1 i • • - TpillE0-7,, - 1 - 1 - ----- 1 \ ‘01 ,L i,.\- \, , .4 --.4-4. - •-_ ,e.ii-,41 ,---1 \ - : .4A laz \ _ i \ ----___......c-i)_____. _• • . 4 k \ 7! nk. \ ,..."..- . j_____ N III ‘ \ \ 3 411.. \ \ \ ---,1 . ,T.- . .92NSLi_-_-__ ___...__...\,_ ___.., • • . 1 . .: .,, ..........----.-.:...k. . • '.• 1 '.6 \"---- I viii:iiii:miiiiiiii:iiiiiiiii:iiiiiiini: • •_ • .‘. . . N:iii:::::i::114igin::;::::::Rena . .. E. • -4 ilVS44.4.-4-.47 °1- -- - - , iri.' ,..LiiiIiiiignigaiiiii.iii::: 1-.. • . .A. - • 181iiii:.!::nigiiiiiiiiiNaraii !'' . ,--... ._ . i-Z to° ' DJ . _ 1 -A . r). • _ ''''....,,* ' ‘Z'''41....*:.............. _......:.....:....-. .... . • .. .. -\• :.• iiiMaidliiiiiiiiiMiliiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiil ',•. • - • . r - - • - ' - .- • • t157. -..---70 :1 • " -ik --t x ):), .. I I - 1 1 \iiV ', ••-• - .. ' • i, ?5". oN .:.:i:i. ..a:::::::K:::::K:i.i:i:i;i:!::i:i:i:i:::::::::::::1;i:x 1 ' i.:,A I 1 1 171- • ia_ ... \ 1., — \ \ , 1 Irll i I ' i t 1 ii, igml , \ - . , ..T : I : 1 I 4 i + iiii::iiiiii:i:i::igi:i::i:iiii:i:K:i:iii:iiiiiiiiiiii:K:K:K:i*i: • .. . . &. -, \ ado VP i ..1.-- 1 -- •P' \ ii:i:i:i:i*K:iii:i:i*iiiii:iiigiii:§:i*Kiiiiiii:iKiiiiiiiiii , < 1 ' iq' 1 i ' t \ ;::K:if;;K:i:31::..0,;::$0.:;:::mit;;:•:•-i--;•:-:•-•• • .. ... . . k . i 1- ,k4._ jk_-- .- , • • 0 i I - i 1 i . 1 . .: 'W.)C.L.Wt6ilirr' AO r,/tA . ___.\ I \ !A 1 I II 1 Ir7' 1 i i 1 .\PC ..-2.-1- MI _NZU - - -11 4' A. . - 447:1- 4- 1. __ \ '1'--1 • • / i '.4,a. I , ;_. 1. .5 V -T 1 K- 1 • • < 1 I I I I V" ' ! i 4_t___ ____ ._..._t_ 1 1 \ j -14 i 10 1 OI \ --1--- - r, ,, , , k.... 1 , , , „ 412r)-4. 4,---T-7—,Iva d 1 I V-. , -- - --4----- _......__11-- - NIM71%714 . 4 I 7/ ' O'i i 1 1 ,I -t--1 -- ------------ - , -,.... •T------- i ., ____ _____ I I : -"- giimf.. 1-1171.--.9,4:rigr: ----- A . ' - /rj . ! 15. '.., i I 1 i 1 ! . / .. cv jj :1I! i • e' , , • - 0 0 1 .- I / II! i i i / ' 1 • .:, / - / I ' 1 I - ' t•I N .'') --.,:i• . ... .. ,.. w , i ) ,/ i , , / \-. • --I :.: 1 .....7, ic, cc-tcl --I .0 o r.- j . / / r . ' - / / -- / 1 t I ON 0 , Z 1 / i / ,_;__-i i 4- iv --. I / / ; •i • • /1 ..__,22.,..=_--=—. •-7',__=_----==-----=' .„: . t, scrp f / i" .1 li i I 1 i I i . . -, . ._1i_,40. 6VI--- ..._ ql 1 i -- - / / , A- - 1 „ , 1 , , „ , .2,,,,,,, ,i.-- .. _ . / i Ii / - , • .. V • .0 / (A ei o as . • o , \ ) / car•terl ..1-1`1777477\ . E . . . . • t . ,_ ,...„,„ ....,..„ . \ ��!/?v �� .. irtirriid' driZZ_Elii1nwi(•=711 ,t-ift, ;. -- - -, ate: .■a. c - - - y ice, L fb j� __ ___ _ 1, I ,.- 'I c4iY/Pr4 I I in 1 , ii, .:. __ft:: r„ ,„1.1fi Iv} ., "nil-'. f!--64'....(4 s.C: f' i I s e :� I 4 II),I 1 I 1 -t ADA '.‘4-1!1 41� I Z o W( r f AI 1 H :, 4 ` rn ... Q` , 44feril i Vf I 1 -\_,,--) i y.i'l.): 't) 61 ,.t,; ,. ,,' ...,. li ift% Til; GI 1 ;.:;:alfel(16: 40' .... ',Or! , % 't'-:' . 111111 IT ,, ,... , fre.ki r 0. - ;J '�w�� - .:�.■.Rry�wiw - rs1Mra _ wry' i' "'Y',�sY lyy„+ i ��`�f t � ;;f�¢ .� �.i 0 �. N Vitii, 0.4.4 ,..4 ''' 1411/1"WirrintI diJjitflai);?::‘ 14k 94 01114`40;03 0 COSIIIIIIIII001- tgljijiktrOe41Vi ,00Arjefit46,, ,AP-0, up aro 10 tad-,-PI:i ,-, co 11W %Flit W. 1111:1141,011,0135011P7W''-":11 OCIPCFCISCPCM APO -f 9 0 0 cc CQ N ...--ir„........ --- --LA H 1:7 > F LA 1 1 I j1=1-alZ . Ho IP 4 OAK .**4 Y C Y 11111, \ill 0. -_- i C*l.- # '. _-)"1 CE . iP-- 1 ._ . t .:.: 'X..c g _ - l _ -_. ".. ._._ __...Z14_id: x---G 3P .a,:� l�J -fitie) t ,--.0,mAtz.--- -? s:f -. Lit :-412 _::. .:-_rtA2: .._.. G lz.. sty..1 t ' viNa -.M', .i? .r :. MA< , 0 a , 5 a ill Z 411i1 . -.M Um GAf:I - ..-ie s - ,}wi -: rr„IIJu4...: 4,`? '7 r._ a..1_16_ PIN:-Et__j. - l0A - a Q U a. uG N U. C 0 -"--) it M § _ L��i.'�. 6%u-,,"`r.r�- ..��-��=.f�--;��-_T .__ ; �' � ��T��9� i !.-/"s;��l'1 � 17'l�� i. '> �J�1� � �, t7 ��N�3� � ©.... . p o. m3a emmem ....�f 4s�ii�___�a�.:_= :�� . J�=� P� � .. ��C� .'_ x�6 �,�� r�tt� � V i�vl vl�r , �.��r;��r� S' fit—. � ---- go)-472 - / r6,_, ,.. o . _. ? 0 r✓a J-f�J' 1 G 1y;4 PLANNING OF REVTON N- r t . 1.- ��=1: Y 1 2 1989 .-..,.,�-. Ou l `,450 :_::rO - h ._-. 2-- -----ILA/_ .. e , A4 1 �. _ .. / 7F �' I - :wiz-- .. ,i C, / . � ... lit , "e 'l °�, , l•y.� �4., V/ A� 1 �I _,' 1 C� sE � W CCU • . I . . .. t.tr .• • 2 ( ,...cd, -.. - N d'f ' 73 % . . - t 16: cA, i,..:..r.:±7...;,. ....:..:L.____. .. , ftft-t-'-„, ;;;17.. ......r..._.!_. 1 . , i I. 74 . I 1ff V---: 1 1 111.4... P i tki 1.! , ----_. . i .1 • . • - . V .J: • .: . __ ‘13 . ,. .. . 1. •. . 4, -• i': • - r(' •• !'I;l''''I . • . ... • -•-_,thrrk.P )> -a .11> . . ! : f. i $. 1" • • . 1' I • . • 1': •-...,,...s, • — —. — — — — —— — —- —- —- ——--—— — — — —- —- ——- — -- —— •-- • • . .. , I . . .• . . t , • , . . . • ---. "e . . • . . . . . . . • •. . •. 1 • . . . . . . • . . . ; . ' . . . ' . • 1 I., . . • ' . . .Is' 1 : • • 1 ' .' ' 1. ..„.,.„.. c 1 _.k I • • P . . -i). f, • . .. . 1 ,....1-ta, ' Mi 1 Imo: . i =mu i • 7 Jil No;mzio . . ci arm, - . 41 • qii 111 ' , . 1: , f r , t ,.. .. .,.._„ . . , , -z. , mi ,, 4 , il W , WI 1 X 1 , • • • . 1 . . . \ ,----..-- --V 70 I-0 II ... ______ .._.. .......:- \ =k) 1yUy fi5i • Hk. 9 ....„ , rn CD i CD Cf) I . ! lnnl EI°3 2 fli gi=z_ T'' iz.- ! ......, RICHARD ' W. PERSON •,-4 .1-74 L7 ---- ull,1211t e: ARCHITECT • .-.., i . . Box 156 Rolling Bay , Washington , •••?• i-i- , W1--1 I t .1 .-reN (206)842-•2114, 98061 1At . _. _ - pu R,A il a' 5 , . E ____:________________ J_____________, ±„,„:::::::::.,_....„..:.___,...„:=.: ::=:_....,...„.:__:.:_.„:„___,=...„...7„:„...:._,,._ _.,....: _. ----7-1-_-2-7:::L_- __:=---..__.______.____-_-__-..1_---------- ..___..:- .__ _______._ • 401N3d JO .Ul ' jllr I 1/(211 ricil ` . _- i .—► VSI! C J ii\ll01d ., � • - ilit i - _ \1 I . . im .7 Q _ I 1imimeamils-N __ _ __ I �,j 1 1 .140 it T 10 - V 0 .„.„ 1 a, At N l l 1 I �1 i i ,, i I. i -7 . . ' t r -- ' i 1 •: ; le.6...,:- IO - I t I • CC ODO I '`1I yYil �l!/! I o 01 > > C� 1 . _; 'NZI - Yd 1 CO C T -11't`d15 z 'oZ -- �3t �Nt 7tr.�bd- I rn ; • •• 'i7 47 aiv' , 10-1114VI-- ---- .--- - - NI 'I il I kilW • DO i ... Ii • t!t I--� O• Z j! • t __ I - ---- 1 • , _ . • 1 • -- - - -- - C ...1 . . • ---_-_______ _ _.. . . - . • . , . Z . .... . tri co', . . • 0 F-- • . , , • . . : . . . .. . , . . ..... . . . . . . . . .___.. . . • , . , .•. : . .• : . • . . • • . : . . .• . . . LIJ w • , • ; . . I— , . . -__FAizI4tNlar gam . 1 I. + -res1...L. . . • . I ; . • , . : . . r... . . . : . .. bo . , .. , . . . ., . . ,-/ I ..c .._._.• L 0 I ' . , . • • • : • CC 0 w = -2 : . oriw--........ . • . . . i L . . . . • • . I . , v. . . . • . . 0 < %DI • •° i i , . , , . . . •X V\: . . . M ..-..' I , . t . . . . . .• . J . i2G?7' LI NI M----) , : 1 i.._._. . . • 'Ilk • ir __. 1 , i i , 1 -.— --,---. . _al - ' - ,k-- • - - 7:— trr \ ii_ ___t2CWH • . --, cL \ I . \ 1 III ' Ili -•÷-1-: -1 , : ; .,- / -1-- , , , 1 , • • , , . : . , — . Y16-- . . !...str..-.--.-. r7.A. e, /"/ . til ‘SI --------- - :-.•-7' 1—11 -,.- -'-, ) — : • \i.. , : : . i i--- : t -1.II ) , . : • .::_44._._.____ __ __ _ ___ __ _ - 0. _1 LI i /i • , ./ rk i • l 1 ' • C:....,14276.1t.:.• I \J DIL ;. 1 . 1/ ....._ _..__ -- • , , 6,„ _I y. ; ,/ 1- . ill c\ th. 1 1 lidall9 It \ I; \dIIIIIIII :! riANAimr. . _ . D /------ Din, ' IV SioN / AIM , . OF fir-A, . IA Y ii 2 ' I 1 // ,t - 1: 1111111 \ \ _ --. !., c 1 9 3 9 • , . .1=======zil -iit- • i 0 ss 1 li EcE n 11 v E Li / 7 • 1 ;P.. • l's- ....._ . ...._ .... ••‘:,k1C• -711.-2Z P!C 'D ------ i 1._ • ; ; , , I ; i ; 1 • I -\91 /---- / - 0-1"7"-c 2r,--51,4 ('-1--3.-- • . ,. ..,• /• 1 :i:i:i: . , . :.:.:.:.:................. ..................... - - !!!!!! 1/ wcz:71 , -nave\ 1 ,t.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .:.:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :: igii: •;.miN; li::ii•-:;fts - - • , : -:::.:::::::::::::::: -:.-... 1 c4;rfe-ta ---) ,,...- • :::i:i:!:i:i:i:::i ;.,;•:i:::.:im:._ : - • i .:.::::*i:i:K:i:i: .:::::::::::::::::::: ! ()! , 1 1 - 1 Z - - 0 ‘,0 IIIIMINIIIMEW itri s.t • : T 0 c..\ 1111•1111111M1M1111111101•111111MMINIMIIMMIUM , , ....kimammiliwsiummiumulli _ . , , , L222 , . • • mallURIVAIIMillik __. ± , , H_, I •• . . „ 1 4 -.1 monseimap.-_ • li • td... ,-79- ' -ii ... EMN-dainiaillilallIIIIIPL411111W—Imalm /...11.111112-41 --.— • -.1•EimmarigisT.Wiiiiirli*.immommmimmImmatimm_sis I, .I 1 t --- , . f 7- • C.--'--- PrV---- — - C -'" F• i •- 0 F-- co co. a 0,, •... i CO = - t... CC (-) ''' I 1 -.,, ) . i J ; I , •::::•Z:` P ti,tm..., •-•••.' \.i____„.,i .,..„ki ro il 1 K:::::::"::::"::::%-iii:1 •:::::::::::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::::1 • ' • ! IMil 4W.: - • • 1• ..:::::::::::.' , ,.:.•••:...:•:. ::::::::::::: Lii LU -••iiiiiii:i:i:i:i:i1 ! .::::K:::::::::::: :::::::: ::::: II MI iii:i.,:i.,:::E.I.,:i.,:i.,:i 1. • 1 I . •:•:•:•:•:•:- i !•:::::::::::: :•:.:•::::::: -1- - •- ."10'•--1.7g-Y t-Z9V -" 1 \I . . - :::::::*:.: I ':i:i:X:i• :i:i::::::::: 1 . ,e''. CI. .• .. . • . . ; . ...*. r..........."......1. ,:::::::,:•: 4 .•. ••, -.. - gi .. . ' Tr------------: (1) imo" . . . . , m7= t:Df11t1 • I1 CO 1. t I _ . ____, . • . _ __ ...... i p ) 1 0 , i , •° . ' = ---__---,....01M11111111.11.1111111.1111.1111_ • • ' • 1 1 . , .----- 1:! N r --T14 12-0 dilimiimmir .---------1) A.6.1..' -'--------- I I i • CC C.) I i ts i Cr '0 cl. • 1 1 ,1 • 1 1 ° ,-( 00. 1 1 . , F•F. „,. • I ___ ___ ___ _ ___ __ __1. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _L 4 1 < • ••••••• 0 0; WET i_ . \lp\rTioti c,:, C•1 - . -- 7 • -411111611PENIMMIliOn... 111.11111•111111Unffilaill...111".....116.111"-mat_... 1.... -----.- f•.1, :- -1L..a . , • ,_,_:_____._ :__ , i , ii ik._ -_ ....., _. _ATosIn =mem •wpm ,_ miesall , . . umaslaimmismummumumm= NUMBOMMMNSINE Z Fli• INI ' MI ' I • . ' ' ' ' ' H . -2-4-L-L.-' MI 2 ' ' ' • ' • ' • -III ---•--MaaiiIVFMC Magallnira r...1.••ocaiiiirponimaimmalocur..on .,. . . .ru----reiz- ,k..<: •1•4 I ,, . 1 kil 111 •••,-., _ , • . t•:::::::-:•:•:::::i k:::i:iMi*i:i:1 IE:4iiiiil :i:i:i:i:::::::i:if: 1- • : -::i:i:::::i:i:i:i4 7i:i:i::.:*::::iii0, It:Miiii-i. iiiiii ' . • • ' - • . 't:i:i:i:iii:11;:i:i:i*i:i:i:i:i:i:i:1 k:::i:::::::::::::::ii :::: :m4,1... . - . • : . mi;11 ii.:x.:::.:.i::::::.:::::1 • :.i..-::.:i:i:i:i:::: .:.i]i:f.i::::i!::i:i:i•:,,,„„,.._____ _ (_.ierZ)1::%. TF21M iiii*i:ii:iiiiii:i :::iiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiiii. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii::i: 1 • , -::gi:i:i:i:ii.1 :iii:i:i:K:K:i:K::: 6:::i:i:i:::i*i:::i 1 • - • • . • • ::..:...:...1 g , piiiiiiiiii:i:.::•:i . .... . , • . . ,•::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•... :•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:.:•:: ;::.:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:. I • • , . • •••••••••••••:: 1,•:•:•:•:-:::i:iii:iii ;:i:i:i:i:i:i:iii:i:: ::*::i:x:i:i:i•:: .. V-- 7 — • . - ............,_ - ..."-- . .h-1-1 -""f-• -,= zi(z-- PLANNING. C:Istri,)_ ioliv 4 • _ _ assiamumummoommimanneffilwimmi___Eim----,.._ •_ - . . • - 1 ::::::i:i*:*:::: . . . 0,/. • . . • L. :: ......• .....ti-iiindlillifimmimans"----mium____ MillmuslialmoloummilIMITI.-r.....---, CAVI-e.- _. -0•: ::A:::iii . / • . 72=-7NKirgeurail ... (1 --- ..-_-_,,,, • /• '"--•. -:7 MMINIME=11115Miln millUmEn P.. inotal ENSimilaiiiii " ' • . 4::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•1, • / L--1 I-- dai is tosemsommuummumminummiummummuumunnommiwour "- . - -• ..-7 - - . ! 1 • . 11%. ill ,t!::::.:::::3::::::n ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::11 :::::::::::::::::::: . ilw;m1 4,„::::-.K..:;m1 pg:i:Kfl ii: :Mi , 4. 1V....e....4:7 _ • 7:::::::::•:•:•:.:1 - .. ..::•:::::••::•::::i >:::::::::::::::::::::•:.: .:-:•:•:•:•:::::•:•. • ' •:::•::•::•:iiii:•Iii::31 `iiiiii:iiiii:iii:::•i:iiiii. aiggi :.:3:iiiiiiiiiiiiiii • I ''' Iiiiiiii::.iiiiiii 1 iiiii::ii:iiiii ii ;•:ii:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii :iiiii:iii:i:i:i: • • . . . ••::i:i:::i:::i::::i -::i:i:i:i:i:x:::::i: i:i:i:i::iini - . - _ :::::::::::::::::::: E:i::::::::::::::::::::::::,, ,:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::, .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:4 . .:.:.:.:•:.:.:.:.:.: ...:.:.:.:.:•:.:.:.:.:.:.:. ,..:.:.:.::::::::::.:. ::::::::::::::::::: . . . ,• • - -._, :••••••:. __i. . . . • . - . -,...,,, -(±5t7)-e-:???_:__-- __ • . . . . . . • • . _._ Goezt1W-.4.4., •, tf ,• l• \- ----- -- . W005, 1-q1/54 . • ...,.„.. , , . - • • --,----—-.. • 1 _ - • ,--- . 1 . t 1 . . • - - . pi. ...., -. . •. 1 - CITY OF fr\ITON . r 1 . . -- - i it? MAY 1 2 1989 1, ... ._ . •.K__/ •49,41=' ,I 1 ! . . • • " ___ . ----4 ... . , -- ' , 0 r_HI . L-S\44\""T I°I* 4 ikI I II __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .....7........... _, /,--- ---i •. • . i , M 1 0 all . . . . •. --. D5M-z, n • • . . ....- • , g 1 P• _ . • • • 0 i -if I 6'9' T e T. AVK tui • • 1•\_, , \N`_*1--1(ft -.-.., • # I . • • • • „ . 1\11 I Ai3H.4i-,.;•_ :_j• - . . . • - - . • , . ...-- . • • ...-----7 , . • • - . . - • . 1 tr , ,,,i ,....,,,.: .„,,;:.,1, . . . • . • - 1 . . . . iu •;i:i:if:•••::::•:iiff ! - .. g.g.g.:-::::•:•:•:.A .....••••••••:•:•••%11 -: I 1.,•....:•:•:•:•:•:.I , r A. • • 11;;;;;11 i•.i....;....i.........::.•.".i.;ii • -•1 111:t:.•:-1:::::::;::.:;1:11'i • . . . ' -111Iii::::r1:::i: 1 ' - . ' ' ' . -15 -RN 1 I ;.' i::..i:i'.:..i.:iiiii•: I • - - rigiiiiiiiiiii.:1 I • , . • , 1:••••iiiii:i.ii.:•:iiiii.: i:::•i`ii:.:•::•:i:i:1' I • I li.iii:i:i:::i::i:::i:i1.1j lt:•::•:•.•5•:::::::;:%•.::1, .::::::::::::::::.:•: . •• ! It:::::::K:::•:•:•:•./. li:::::::::::::::::::::1 1 I [t:;:::i:;:•:::.:*i:•:31 1 • • • • . • • . -JaA0 ).tiri - \M ._,-... -.... T . .... . 1 , . . , . • . . . „. 4 I.....,...... . • • , . 0 ,•• . • ' " , . • . . . . . . 1 r . , • . , • ! pm MM.711Mg71 1 I 4,:ii:::::i:K:K:i*?iimiii:iiin:::N1 i..:*-: :::::•. :::*:.::*g 1 • - 1 LE.:i.f::::.:if:iiii:":.:il iiiiiiiiiiii.:iiii:iiiiif fa.::::•ii::.:•§•:.i : i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:iiiiii :.::i::::.::: vm-zi.1.-. 14Pm-- ::,:::,,:::,::•A , . . ,_.:,...4...: ! /- .• -,ffemi! v:iiiiiiiii:::iiiiii 1 - . • i Poiii-:iiii-iii.ii.;1 ai:imi:i : pi::i;i;i:;:.y,, 1 Nr/ i.si,i 4.-zsiln ' 11 ! ! ! ! 114___LLLI_LL_L.44__LL p ..-y- -ei..i. -.UMW= inniamimmlin7wims.msrisnramaimaussaimmeammim limm. loalumullH, -"-H-I-H-H--, ; : 1 77 7_„ E:_,._.: 7, • , . ,7 : i i :_; i 1_._:_, i_ {.4 --2 2 ' ' ' ' '-' !-'-!-1- ----!-,--------•, : -!r--.-H--! . : ' _--- ! • _ _ CZ?Zi -11.1- 9Na Z. ; ,••••• - I- - " I -, • • it I E\ i'+' .,., - , •,, J=I li i -...-Ar. k.) I ll / II I. 0 I .1..VAl, _ c' . 1 IND 6.4 DJ 0 ° -.. • • . ! 1°1 7 09 ' ( - • . - 44 ' CA .47----------------„, , • 072. (1..1. . i., ...5,- > I . • . " . . • • NI_ • = 0 jj,, I -.:-. ,: --A-PdiNALN7/7 •-•\ • .'-'-_ . • - .\ . . . . . . • : o - 0 i . • • • , ..... 04--- LA 'f' • . • . • -. . - ••. . ' . • !! .' , • • . ' . ...... * ! • . . . . ! • : ' I . . ' • • . - 11 - a? •! 0 ...•• •7w?m.-:.=.77.' ‘'•••••••••••••••••:•:•:•:::11-1!••:•:••.•:•:•:•:••.;-.:::-...:::!! 1;7:7.7.55.M1 "•i:i:K:igiiiiii:::iiiiii , .i: i:iiiiii:iiiii:i;i:i::.:•::ii .:.:::i:•:iiii::* iiii :-:•:.:.::::::::':':'>:: :':':':':':':':'::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::i::::::::•:'! ir.•::::::::::::::"::'•••::::i 11:::::::::*::•:•:::•:1 ::::::::::•::::::::::::::::! :::::K:K:::::::: :::i:K:';:i:M: -.i:::.:.:i:i:i:i:K:iff.i:i:: '::*;i0 ! .- . 1): wzil.. a:icavm :::m::.::.::.::::::::::, ::::::::. 1: ::,, , ::,, :::::: ....:::.::::::::: .::::.... , !!' '..'::::•:-:!:::::4' 'iM :::: :::41 W:::::::Wg::::ii i:,--]::::.:g::Ei 0::::i::E:i"A R::::, imi:si miiii.i-::.::::iiiiii:iii -.........:.::....i:aii. : i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i*i:i:::..:A :::::::::::: 1;.:.:.,:.:.:.:.,.,.:4 „.....................• ••• li 0 :C./' 157/1 /.. 4772r-J-1-111157 - • ®'DM '3DN3e11131N1 TVID131121Y /03 s • . . • 'i • . • • Z.. Cl) •1 . • i I-A- -, 11.1 Sil mmi nimalliMENInsmi nem=.9 inamEll min=meiilli 1 ig==.12. =an..,==_LE F. 0117..mCille•C==.1•=i7 7..'..!',..o....1) E...svci .. vo n 0 c° 4 1 0 --muommammamminmonm ' i ! ' ! ! ' ct-H_ , . i 'I-t 1 1 i , , ! ; i i i i ; H I' . . • . , o --.- - GzPa,1 -- ---It-i- .7hiP, -m!..6-1 . ' il 1 lifHt , li---1 , 4W iii ..r Z . •.............. ...................... .......• ..... 4-- )...., ------- :.i:g.:-......:•:•:.:. :•:•:•:.:.:.:•:,...:-......4 [:-:.....:....:-:-:.:•: r:•:•:.:.:•:•:•:.:•:1 •:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:•:.:: .:.:.:.:.:.:•:•:.:•:. , --er---in ,:-:•:•:-.%•••••••i .-.••••••••••••:.,:•,, „•:-:•.:.:.:.:.:....:.: 1::.:.:::.:.:.:::_:-:.:1 ,.:.:.:.:::.:.::::::::::. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::::: i 0 :::::::::::::::::::::::: ,:::::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: E. - ,:.:•::::::::::::::, i.::;-i:i:::i;:2,::::::: .:•:-:•:-,...--. .:,:4444.,,,,,,41 ••••-•••t•S\:<,:, ItOt.NY2ft01.:I _L- IS71P -AK:, ia .''' " 261.....1 (1.14--'7------'- .1 '__...... 402N . SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE f CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION DATE APPLICATION NO. : ECF; SA-053-89 APPLICANT: Mike Forrester LOCATION: Taylor Ave. N.W. between N.W. Fourth Street and N.W. Fourth Place. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7,400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at a.m. on, ,, 19 , in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received June 7, 1989) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received May 12, 1989) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Mike Forrester,, has requested site plan approval to allow development of an approximately 7,400 square foot, two-story office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. 2 . The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21C, 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on June 28, 1989 and modified on July 19, 1989 after reconsideration requested by the applicant, with the following conditions: Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Date Page 2 a. That the applicant develop a traffic mitigation plan for improvements to Taylor Avenue (including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting and paving) , subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. b. That the applicant develop a storm water drainage management plan, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. c. That the applicant develop a construction mitigation plan including the following: 1) erosion control plans; 2) plan for delineation of hours of operation; and 3) plan for hauling routes/hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of site preparation permits, and is subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Police Department. d. That the applicant provide a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. This bond should be secured prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. e. That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development on the property to office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to personal service offices (4-711, B. 1.b.2) which generate limited non-employee traffic, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. Professional offices (4-711 B. l.b. 3 . ) would be prohibited. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limit traffic intrusion to adjacent local roadways, and to limit noise, light and glare impacts caused by vehicular traffic. This covenant should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Note: Permitted uses would include accounting services, architects, computer software development, engineering services. Prohibited uses would include medical and dental offices. ) Language of covenant approved by Lawrence Warren, City Attorney, on July 26, 1989. Note: At the time of site plan review, conditions will be established, including, but not limited to the following: a. That the applicant provide a revised sign plan to address Zoning Ordinance criteria for design and location of signs. b. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and recreation impacts, which includes on-site recreational amenities (e.g. outdoor picnic tables and/or a roof garden) , in advance of land use public hearing review, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and (in the event that a roof garden is the preferred option) the Public Works Department and the Building Division. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Date Page 3 c. That the applicant provide a revised lighting plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and light and glare impacts, which depicts full illumination of the site for efficient, safe operations and which directs lighting fixtures to address off-site light and glare impacts. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. d. That the applicant provide a revised landscaping plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic, housing and light and glare impacts, which includes: 1) a fifteen foot wide landscaping strip along the southern perimeter of the property (or a five foot wide strip and six foot high fencing) ; 2) redesigns conifer screening on the north side of the parking garage to improve visibility in order to reduce potential for crimes against persons or property; and 3) relocates the handicapped access route away from the required landscaping corridor. These revisions are required so that the plan will be in compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance and in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts to the site and neighboring properties. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. e. That the applicant provide a landscaping performance bond, in the amount of $3, 000. 00, to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the protection of the landscaping materials and the landscaping irrigation system. The bond should be provided in advance of the granting of the Certificate of Occupancy, and should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. 4. Plans for the proposal have been review by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject proposal is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Multi- Family Residential Use. 6. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 7. The subject site was part of the original plat of the City of Renton. The site was zoned Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use (R-3) by the adoption of Ordinance 1770 on June 9, 1959. The site was rezoned to Business Use (B-1) by the adoption of Ordinance 2136 on March 1, 1965. 8. Land uses surrounding the subject site are commercial uses to the north and east and apartment houses to the south and west. 9. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. SITE PLAN APPROVAL CRITERIA Section 4-738 (D, 1) lists ten criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Date Page 4 General Criteria 1. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; 2 . Conformance with existing land use regulations; 3 . Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; 4. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; 7. Provision of adequate light and air; 8. Mitigation of noise, odors, and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on were: a. b. 3 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Decision: The site plant for file no. is subject to the following conditions: 1. 2 . For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and' the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be ' stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned : to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Date Page 5 ORDERED this day of , 19 . on behalf of the Site Plan Review Committee. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this day of , 19 , to the parties of record: Richard Person P.O. Box 156 Rolling Bay, WA 98061 Michael Forrester 1522 N. Brooks Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this day of , 19 , to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development ,Director Larry Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before 19 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by, such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, ' Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires' that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on , 119 L accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communicationsiare public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA .42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14. Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-i zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION . SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Mathewson Automotive Center August 15, 1989 Page 4 6. The site plan, as presented,1 provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 7 . The subject site is part of the original City of Renton plat. The site was zoned Commercial Use (B-1) in 1953 when zoning was adopted for the City. 8. Land use surrounding the subject site includes commercial uses to the north and south, Renton Airport to the east, and single-family residential uses to the west. 9. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review, under Section 4-738 of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, described below: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies: U, The proposed commercial development conforms the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of the pro.ert for commercial use. It is also consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for Commercial Development, such as V.A. 1. which calls for commercial uses to be allowed to the extent of short-term needs; V.A.4. , which calls for commercial areas to be located and designed to minimize travel and congestion and to promote safety; V.A.7 which calls for commercial uses to be compatible with adjacent land uses; and V.B.5. which calls for developments to be designed to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent properties. Similarly, the project is consistent with Urban Design Goals, Objectives and Policies for area growth patterns, for maintenance of district integrity and for improvements such as landscaping and signage. The proposed automotive center is planned to replace an existing center which would benefit from modernization through the creation of more 'attractive structures and grounds, and through increased efficiency of operations. It is to be located along a major travel corridor, on which numerous commercial developments currently exist. The project, as proposed and/or recommended, is designed and located on the site in a manner which will ensure compatibility between this development and neighboring commercial uses. Further, the project has been designed in a manner which complements nearby residential uses. (See Sections 9.c. and 9.d. for additional information) . b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The planned retail/service center has generally been proposed by the proponent and/or is recommended by staff to be designed to conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements for Commercial Use (4-711) ; Parking and Loading (4-2204) , and Landscaping (4-744) . The development as originally, proposed does meet lot coverage, setback, height and bulk requirements. Parking and loading areas were modified on revised site plans (submitted on August 3, 1989)' to comply with Code requirements in order to provide an appropriate number of parking spaces and a maneuvering area, to permit adequate, safe access to vehicles, and linkages to facilitate safe, efficient pedestrian access. '(See Section 9. f. ) . Similarly, a revised landscaping plan has been submitted which essentially conforms to Landscaping Ordinance requirements (4-744) for on-site and periphery landscaping and which mitigates aesthetic impacts and light and glare Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Mathewson Automotive Center August 15, 1989 Page 5 impacts. (Note: Some minor modifications to size and species of plantings may be desirable; if necessary, specifications for these modifications will be required to be in place prior to the issuance of a building permit for this site. ) A landscaping performance bond, in the amount of $3, 000. 00 will also be required. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Mathewson Automotive Center August 15, 1989 Page 6 c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; Off-site impacts have been identified in the following areas: housing, aesthetics, traffic, noise and light and glare. 1) Housing As previously noted, residential development exists to the west of the proposed development, across Nelson Place. Particular efforts have been made -- through proposals/recommendations for structural design and location, landscaping, access routes, noise/odor mitigation and similar measures -- to minimize impacts upon local residents. 2) Aesthetics Potential aesthetic impacts from the proposed development have been identified relating to the fact that the site abuts Rainier Avenue, an entryway corridor to the City, and to the proximity of residential development. In order to mitigate those impacts, the project has, been proposed/recommended to incorporate a number of features to enhance design and function. For example, the structure will include articulated facades throughout. Exterior siding of stucco (or a similar material) is recommended to ensure that the proposed development is attractive in appearance and is durable (e.g. long-lasting, capable of withstanding physical abuse, and of sufficient thickness to help to control noise) in order to visually integrate the structure with a proposed commercial development on the abutting site to the south. Similarly, on-site landscaping, illumination and signage have been proposed/recommended to complement the development and to mitigate off-site impacts. For example, the landscaping', plan includes plantings sufficient in size, number and diversity to provide an attractive viewscape and' visual buffer tooinin i( ,-fut�rs properties. Exterior lighting staiulcuAls.'"- re esigned to direct illumination away from abutting sites. Signage will be required to conform to City regulations, to be compatible with abutting developments and to be appropriate for locationlon a principal arterial/entryway to the City. 3) Traffic Off-site traffic impacts will be discussed in Section 9. f. below. 4) Noise, light and glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated below in Section 9.h. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; On-site impacts from the proposed development have been identified in the following areas: aesthetics, traffic, noise, light and glare. 1) Aesthetics Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Mathewson Automotive Center August 15, 1989 Page 7 e location of the •- = 'the designof t e retail sales/sery 1111101110111NU„.,i«- structure (e.g. \ ticulated facades, convenient acces- , visible entries) , landscaping which is wel ; planned and ample, complete illumination and signage .rovide an attractive, efficient project for users and passersby. 2) Traffic On-site traffic impacts will be discussed in Section 9. f. below. 3) Noise, light and glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated below in Section 9 .h. e. Conservation of area-wide property valuesi The planned commercial project is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since the development is proposed/recommended to be designed to: 1) improve the attractiveness and efficiency of use on the site; and 2) be compatible with uses on neighboring properties. '\ f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian ' ` circulation; The amended site plan (dated August 3, 1989) provides a parking and loading plan which conforms to the City's Parking and Loading Ordinanceirequirements for numbers of spaces, dimensions, maneuvering areas and ingress/egress points. This plan allows for safe, efficient passage by vehicles and pedestrians both at the access points (Nelson Place and Rainier Avenue) and on the site. Although the proposed parking%circulation plan meets basic Code requirements for the site, staff will recommend some modifications to this plan so that access routes from both Nelson Place and Rainier Avenue are designed to serve both the subject property and the adjacent property to the south. This joint access system will increase efficiency and safety of operations for the herein proposed development, and for a new development (Bigley Building) proposed for that adjacent site, thereby, addressing the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use policies calling for clustered commercial development and shared access routes for commercial development. The proposed (revised) on-site illumination plan and pedestrian linkage plan also serve to enhance effective, safe use of the site. However, these plans may need some minor revisions to conform to. modifications necessary to create the recommended joint access plan. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed development has been designed and sited so that the structure is well-separated from neighboring residential uses to the west (across Nelson Place) . It is similarly well-separated from the commercial use to the north. The property to the south of the site is currently vacant, but is under consideration for commercial development as well; plans are being made to develop the subject site and the neighboring parcel in a coordinated manner, and in a way which provides for sufficient, light and air circulation between those uses. Commercial development to the east is separated from the site by Rainier Avenue. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Mathewson Automotive Center August 15, 1989 Page 8 h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; 1) Construction Construction activities will generate some noise, dust and debris to the site and the surrounding area. Mitigation measures recommended in conjunction with environmental review (See Section 3 above) Hare sufficient to address impacts upon adjacent residential and commercial developments and upon Rainier Avenue as well. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Mathewson Automotive Center August 15, 1989 Page 9 2) Operation The proposed automotive sales and service development is anticipated to create some noise, odor, and light and glare impacts upon surrounding residential and commercial developments. Noise generated by this development is not anticipated to be significantly greater than that generated by neighboring commercial uses and by vehicles travelling along Rainier Avenue. That noise which is Created (particularly the auto service component) is proposed to be mitigated through insulation of the structure and through location of service areas/parking areas away from residences. Some unpleasant odors may be anticipated from the automotive service operation. Plans for location of the service facility and for ventilation of that portion of the structure are expected to limit impacts to the site and to surrounding properties. Some debris from automotive service operations (e.g. oil changes, changing of brake fluid) is anticipated. The Fire Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department (Storm Drainage Engineering) report that the planned containment systems, required by the Environmental Review Committee in conjunction with environmental review, and also required in conjunction with building permit review, will be sufficient to control spillage. (See Section 9. i. also) . No other unpleasant or harmful conditions are anticipated. i. Availability of public services and utilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Public services and utilities are generally available to serve the site. Fire Prevention Bureau representatives and Police Department staff report adequate resources to provide the anticipated type and level of services required for this development. Similarly, public utilities (water, sewer) are available to serve the site, with standard fees/improvements recommended by the Public Works department. Storm water run-off containment/management systems have been required (by the Environmental Review Committee, the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Public Works Department) to be designed with oil/water separators and other devices necessary to both contain the water and to separate fluids spilled in conjunction with automotive service operations from contamination of the storm water collection system and from the underlying terrain. ' (Note: The project is located outside of the City's aquifer, well away from shorelines, with underlying soils being such that j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is expected to have a generally positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing redevelopment of an existing commercial use which would benefit by upgrading, and by making efficient use of a property which is adjacent to a major arterial/entryway. Conclusions: Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Mathewson Automotive Center August 15, 1989 Page 10 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments 'and focused on were: Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision Mathewson Automotive Center August 15, 1989 Page 11 a. Aesthetics b. Traffic management c. Noise, light and glare d. Impacts upon adjacent housing e. Storm water management/spill containment 3 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial Use. Decision: The site plan for the Mathewson Automotive Center , file no. SA 043-89 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with all conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on June 28, 1989, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits for the project. 2 . That the applicant provide revised access plans which enable joint access to the site and to the parcel immediately to the south from Rainier Avenue and from Nelson Place to facilitate safer, more efficient access to both sites. (Note: In the event that modifications to the access plan require corollary modifications to the parking, maneuvering, exterior lighting, pedestrian linkage and landscaping plans, these plans should be revised as well. ) Plans shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3 . That the applicant shall provide a landscaping performance bond, in the amount of $1, 000, to be valid for a period of three (3) years, subject to approval by the City Attorney. The bond shall be in place prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the development. 4. That the applicant shall provide a signage plan (including location, size and bands, but not including content) which integrates the sign and the structure which conforms to City regulations and which is designed to be appropriate to the location of the site on a major arterial at an entryway to the City. This plan shall be approved by the Planning Division and the Building Division prior to the issuance of building permits. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. • ORDERED this day of , 19 . on behalf of the Site Plan Review Committee. • BEGINNING . • OF FILE • FILE TITLE SA ufeta,to • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT June 28, 1989 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Richard Person PROJECT: Forrester Office Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; SA-053-89 (L. Blauman) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot, two-story office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Taylor Avenue N.E. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 . 1 S.F. o <i): „ 1 . .\\ 2 /4 1"-I 1 . ...% 1-t3 I 1 qs• i i , I -.(\J-4 1 > . i i y! - . _.\*.•:- — I _ IA ,,c 1 A 4 .ffilla 2 ct IMMEglr Sip, I .1 El \t .6 (I, % i, 12=, 1 1 , 1 -• - Ill 4 . 1 rt. 1 ..r 11S—FA i 1" I 1 I viitli.-1-1/ AM? 111:--aci Environmental Revi Committee Staff Report Forrester Office Building Page 2 June 28, 1989 B. ANALYSIS 1. BACKGROUND: 2 . ISSUES: 1. Whether the applicant has adequately_ identified and addressed environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with this development? a. Earth .. The subject property is sloped. The slope is limited to a maximum of five percent throughout the majority of the site, however, there is an area at the eastern perimeter of the property which has al fifty percent slope. No devel',opment is planned for that area. The project has been designed so that lot coverage on the developable portions of the site is limited in order to: 1) acknowledge the presence of the 50% slope; and 2) address the five per cent slope on the remainder of the parcel. Fencing will serve to separate the steeply sloped area from the developed area, and extensive landscaping in place/proposed for the sloped area should serve to protect that area. The Public Works Department staff has not required a soils engineering study, but representatives of that Department and of the Planning Division have made recommendations for improvements (e.g. driveway slope and location, storm water drainage management) which are designed to address the presence of the slope. b. Housing The subject parcel is bordered on the west by property which is zoned for and developed with single-family homes and multiifamily residential uses. The fact that the proposed development would be an infill -- because properties in the area are developed with either commercial or residential uses -- makes it unlikely that this office complex wouldlllhave a significantly negative impact on the neighborhood. Those impacts which might be anticipated -- such as noise, light and glare, aesthetics, traffic -- will be recommended to be mitigated so that the proposed development and the existing uses (especially the nearby residences) can successfully co-exist (See Sections 2.c-g ,below) . c. Aesthetics The proponent proposes to construct a two-story office structure of stucco and glass, with tile roofing. The structure will be located on the east side of the Environmental Revi Committee Staff Report Forrester Office Building Page 3 June 28, 1989 property, well-away from residential developments to the west of the site. Parking will be located both in a garage (10 spaces) under the structure and at ground level (30 spaces) to the west of the sitructure. The structure will be oriented to the north and to the west -- the separation between the structure and resid',ential uses to the west should serve', to mitigate impacts on those uses. The orientation away from the southern, perimeter should serve, in combination with other measures defined in this , report, to mitigate impacts upon the residential structures on the property to the south. Landscaping proposed/recommended for the site is designed to provide an attractive view area, to serve as a visual barrier between the site and neighboring properties (especially to provide either fifteen feet of landscaping or five feet of landscaping with a six-foot high fence along the southern property line to protect the residential property to the south) , and to• preserve the integrity of the sloped area On the eastern portion of the site. At the time of site plan review, the signagie plan on the east facade of the structure will be recommended to be revised to provide a sign which conforms to urban design/site plan review criteria (e.g. attractive, durable, compatible in size and style with neighboring uses, and in conformance with requirements for signage along major travel corridors) . d. Transportation The proposed 7400 square foot office complex is proposed to be a professional office complex which will employ ten persons at present, generating 77 AWDVTE (10 x 7.7 trips) . It is possible that a maximum of 10 additional persons might be employed at a future date, generating an additional 77 AWDVTE -- or a total of 154 trips. As this is not a service complex, such as a medical/dental office,', there will be a quite limited amount of client/visitor, traffic. (Note: If the property were developed to maximum density with residential uses -- 60 AWDVTE would be estimated to be generated by the allowed six single- family homes or 165 ADWVTE would be generated by the allowed 25 multi-family units on the subject property. ) Based upon the characteristics (design, location, purpose) of the proposed development, the Traffic Engineering Division staff estimates only minor Environmental Revi _ Committee Staff Report Forrester Office Building Page 4 June 28, 1989 transportation impacts from this development to the site, to abutting residential and commercial properties and toiadjacent rights-of-way. Note is made of the fact that only one access to the property exists -- Taylor Avenue -- and that this access route is well away from major arterials. In order to ensure efficient, safe service to vehicular and pedestrian traffic to the site, and to protect abutting properties appropriately, staff do recommend some improvements be provided as follows: 1) off-site improvements along Taylor Avenues-- including paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street lighting ; 2) the grade of the parking lot not exceed eight per cent -- this is a particular concern on the markedly sloped eastern section of the property - - in order to protect site slope integrity and facilitate safe, efficient access by commuting and emergency vehicles; 3) the handicapped access route be relocated so that it is not within the required landscaping area; and 4) the parking area be screened by landscaping and fencing as required to provide a visual barrier. e. Public Services/Utilities Staff report that sufficient service resources and infrastructure/utilities ' are available to serve the proposed development, with standard improvements (e.g. lighting, signage, buildings identification, hydrants) , and with the payment of appropriate system development fees. PubliciWorks states that storm drainage management system plans will need to be designed, based upon the SCS Hydrograph or similar method, to a 10 year storage/release rate, with an outflow for a two year storm. Baffled oil/water separators will also be required. f. Noise, light and glare 1. Construction -- See Section G. 2. below. 2. Operations The proposed professional office development is designed and located (on the eastern perimeter of the site) such that no significant noise is anticipated to be generated during operations. Because the project is planned to be operated during standard business hours (i.e. 8:00 a.m. to 5: 00 p.m. ) -- anticipated sound from traffic and from utilization is expected to be confined to those hours, thereby minimizing impacts on nearby residences. Environmental Revi Committee Staff Report Forrester Office Building Page 5 June 28, 1989 Staff note the proximity of Renton Municipal Airport to the site, and describe some likely noise impacts from airport operations. That noise is anticipated to be mitigated to the point where impacts are acceptable by structural insulation and by building orientation away from the Airport. Staff will recommend that the exterior lighting plan be revised so that there is sufficient pedestrian-scaled lighting to fully illuminate the site, particularly the entryways and the parking area, to ensure safe, efficient operation of this office complex. This lighting should be directed to the interior of the site and buffered with landscaping so that there are no off- site light and glare impacts. Adequate landscaping should also help to buffer interior lighting -- office lighting is typically more intense than residential lighting -- from the site to neighboring residential uses. (Note: Staff also suggest that the proponent be requested to install window coverings to further limit off-site light and glare impacts) . g. Recreation Staff note that the property is located well away from public recreation centers and service centers. In order to provide on-site recreational opportunities to office complex employees, staff recommend the addition of such amenities as picnic tables, and outdoor seating areas. These may be provided in the landscaped areas or a roof garden may be provided. h. Construction The proponent should be required to provide a construction plan including erosion control, hours of construction operations, hauling hours and hauling route, and a street clean-up bond, to ensure ,that construction activities do not place an undue burden upon the neighboring properties -- particularly the residential uses to the south and west -1 or upon the municipality. C. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend that ERC issue an Environmental Determination of Non- Significance - Mitigated, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and recreation impacts, which includes on-site recreational amenities (e.g. outdoor picnic tables and/or a Environmental Revi(. Committee Staff Report ) Forrester Office Building Page 6 June 28, 1989 roof garden) , in advance of land use public hearing review, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and (in the event that a roof garden is the preferred option) the Public Works Department and the Building Division. 2. That the applicant provide a revised lighting plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and light and glare impacts, which depicts full illumination of the site for efficient, safe operations and which 'directs lighting fixtures to address off-site light and glare impacts. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 3. That the applicant provide a revised landscaping plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic, housing and light and glare impacts, which includes: a) a fifteen foot wide landscaping strip along the southern perimeter of the property (or a five foot wide strip and six foot high fencing) ; b) redesigns conifer screening on the north side of the parking garage to improve visibility in order to reduce potential for crimes against persons or property; and c) relocates the handic',apped access route away from the required landscaping corridor. These revisions are required so that the plan will be in compliance with the City's ZoningiOrdinance and in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts to the site and neighboring properties. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the approval of. the Planning Division. 4 . That the applicant provide a landscaping performance bond, in the amount of $3, 000. 00, to be valid for a period, of three years, to ensure the protection of the landscaping materials and the landscaping irrigation system. The bond should be provided in advance of the granting of the Certificate of Occupancy, and should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. 5. That the applicant develop a traffic mitigation plan for improvements to Taylor Avenue (including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting and paving) , subject to the ' approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits.' 6. That the applicant develop a construction mitigation plan including the following: a) erosion control plans; b) plan 'for. delineation of hours of Environmental Revi' Committee Staff Report Forrester Office Building Page 7 June 28, 1989 operation; and c) plan for hauling routes/hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of site preparation permits, and is subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Police Department. 7 . That the applicant provide a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2, 000.00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. This bond should be secured prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. 8 . That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development on the subject property to general office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to those which do not generate any non-employee traffic. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limiting traffic intrusion to the adjacent local roadways. This covenant should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of site apre araatio /building permits. Note:• At the time of site plan review a revised p will be required to address Zoning Ordinance criteria for design and location of signs. D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Probable minor impact - public services. No indication of on-site lighting. Covered parking needs installation of such. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact - public services. Design Engineering: Probable minor impacts - earth, air, water, and transportation. More information necessary - utilities. Applicant shall submit proposed sewer and water tie-ins, off-site improvements, etc. per City of Renton standard plans. Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impacts - earth, air, water, energy & natural resources, housing, ;light & glare, transportation, public services, and utilities. Off- site improvements would include the following: curb, gutters and sidewalk fronting site; pave unpaved half of the street on Taylor Ave. NW; one street light 'required per City standards near north property line overhanging Taylor Ave. NW. Contact Traffic Engineering for installation standards. Environmental Revi Committee Staff Report Forrester Office Building Page 8 June 28, 1989 Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact - utilities. Require extensions of existing City's water and sanitary sewer in order to serve subject development. Storm Water Utility: Probable minor impact - Retention/detention requirements will be based on SCS hydrograph or similar hydrograph method for 10 year storage/10 year release rate. The outflow on the 10 year design storm release rate will not exceed the outflow on a 2 year design' storm. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control measures will be addressed on a separate plan sheet. The oil/water separator used shall be a baffled oil/water separator per City of Renton standards. Drainage plan will need to be revised (detention pipe cannot be beneath the structure) . Parks and Recreation: No comment sheet. Building Division: Probable minor impact - housing. Current Planning Division: 1) Recommend DNS; 2) shall a street cleaning bond be required? 3) Grade of parking lot to far east is not be exceed 8% slope. Long Range Planning: The applicant should adequately mitigate the light and glare impacts on the surrounding residential neighborhood. The building should be so designed to be compatible with the surrounding residential environment. I ti 6 CITY OF RENTON m.L1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE : October 4, 1989 TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk FROM: San ' eeger, Planning. I RE : Mike Forrester Forrester Office Building (SA-053-89) With this memo I am transmitting the above referenced file to you. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 i % vo _ CITY OF RENTON ,.eaLL %s. • h=, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division September 12 , 1989 Richard Person PO Box 156 Rolling Bay, WA 98061 • Re: Forrester Office Building Taylor Avenue N.W. ECF; SA-053-89 Dear Mr. Person: The Site Plan Review Committee's Report regarding the referenced application distributed on August 17, 1989 has not been appealed within the 14 day reconsideration/appeal period which expired September 1, 1989 . Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner and project manager for this project, at 235-2550 if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, Dona K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE:mjp cc: Michael Forrester 1522 N. Brooks Renton, WA 98055 Bob Rivily 245 Seneca N.W. Renton, WA 98055 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 N�NG UI� Q .................................. • • On the al s+ day of u t , 19 nq, I deposited in the mails o the United States a sealed envelope containing ' *- documents. This information was sent to: Name . . Representing Signature of Sender) �` ,� , Subscribed and sworn to me this c2-/ day of /Q2/ 6.7 19 S)/y ,Notary P li in and for the State, l,p1mW stop residing at therein. 1 1 L . r C SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON • REPORT AND DECISION AUGUST 16, 1989 APPLICATION NO. : ECF; SA-053-89 APPLICANT: Michael Forrester LOCATION: Taylor Ave. N.W. between N.W. Fourth Street and N.W. Fourth Place. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7,400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 9: 00 a.m. on, August 9, 1989, in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal •Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received June 7, 1989) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received May 12 , 1989) . Exhibit No. 4 Building ,elevation plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Mike Forrester, has requested site plan approval to allow development of an approximately 7,400 square foot, two-story office, building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. 2. The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 2 a. That the applicant develop a traffic mitigation plan for improvements to Taylor Avenue (including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting and paving) , subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. b. That the applicant develop a storm water drainage management plan, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. c. That the applicant develop a construction mitigation plan including the following: 1) erosion control plans; 2) plan for delineation of hours of operation; and 3) plan for hauling routes/hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of site preparation permits, and is subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Police Department. d. That the applicant provide a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2,000.00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. This bond should be secured prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. e. That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development on the property to office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to personal service offices (4-711, B.1.b.2) which generate limited non-employee traffic. Professional offices (4-711 B. 1.b.3 . ) would be prohibited. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limit traffic intrusion to adjacent local roadways, and to limit noise, light and glare impacts caused by vehicular traffic. This covenant should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Note: Permitted uses could include, but not be limited to, developments such as accounting services, architects, computer software development, engineering services. Prohibited uses would include, but not be limited to, developments such as medical and dental offices. ) Language of covenant approved by Lawrence Warren, City Attorney, on July 26, 1989. 4 . Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject proposal is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Multi- Family Residential Use, however, it is consistent with the commercial B-1 land use zoning designation and with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for Commercial Development. . Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 3 7. The subject site was part of the original plat of the City of Renton. The site was zoned Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use (R-3) by the adoption of Ordinance 1770 on June 9, 1959. The site was rezoned to Business Use (B-1) by the adoption of Ordinance 2136 on March 1, 1965. 8. Land uses surrounding the subject site are commercial uses to the north and east and apartment houses to the south and west. 9. Section 4-738 (D, 1) lists ten criteria that the Site Plan Review Committee is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Site Plan Approval application. These include the following: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The City's Comprehensive Plan Map designates the property for medium density multi-family residential development. As such, the proposed office complex does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan Map. However, the proposed office development generally conforms to Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for Commercial Development, such as V.A.4. which calls for commercial areas to be located and designed to minimize travel and congestion and to promote safety; V.A.5, which calls for sufficient access, circulation, walkways and off street parking to be provided by commercial developments; V.B. 3, which calls for structures to be adequately set back and buffered from other uses; V.B.4. which calls for site plan design to provide for efficient and functional use of land; and V.B.5, which calls for developments to be designed to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent properties. Similarly, the project is consistent with Urban Design Goals, Objectives and Policies for area growth patterns, for maintenance of district integrity and for improvements such as landscaping and signage. The office complex, as proposed and/or recommended, is designed and located on the site in a manner which will ensure compatibility between this development and neighboring commercial uses. Further, the project has been designed to complement nearby residential uses (see Section 9.c. and 9.d. for additional information) . b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The planned office complex has generally been proposed by the proponent to conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements/development standards for Commercial Use (4-711) , such as density, height, and setbacks. With modifications as recommended by staff, the complex will also comply with requirements established in the Parking and Loading Ordinance (4-2204) (e.g. number and location of parking spaces, location and dimensions of access routes) and with the Landscaping Ordinance (4- 744) (e.g. reduction in conifers adjacent to the proposed structures) . Site Plan Review Commi e Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 4 The eastern portion of the site is steeply sloped. It has not been identified as a "greenbelt" on the Comprehensive Plan, however, the applicant has elected not to develop this section of the site, rather choosing to segregate this section and retain/maintain the natural vegetation thereon. (See Section 9.c. and 9.d. for further discussion) . Because the site has no identified greenbelt, there is no requirement to reduce density, however, the proposed level of density is less than the maximum permitted with or without greenbelt. c. Mitigation of impact to surrounding properties and uses; Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses have been identified by staff in the areas of housing, aesthetics, traffic circulation, noise, light/glare, public services/utilities and earth/natural environment. 1) Housing The subject property is bounded to the west (across Taylor Avenue) and to the south by multi-family residential complexes. City regulations and policies mandate that the proposed office development be designed and sited to be compatible with residential uses. The proponent has generally addressed these regulations/policies or will be required to do so in conjunction with this site plan review -- see further discussion concerning structural design in Section 9.b and 9.d.2 . . Conditions required in conjunction with environmental review (Section 3) should also serve to mitigate impacts upon these nearby residential uses. For example, the requirements for restrictive covenants established by the Environmental Review Committee to limit allowed uses to those which are not oriented to public service is anticipated to reduce the number of visitors to the site, thereby decreasing traffic, noise and other disruptions to the nearby residential complexes. 2) Aesthetics The applicant, working with staff, has generally endeavored to make the proposed office structure complementary in design, size and scale to nearby residential and commercial developments. The structure is proposed to be two stories in height, and to be finished with stucco siding, and hipped (concrete tile) roofing to further increase compatibility with vicinity uses. Revisions to the proposed landscaping plan will be required to ensure an attractive visual barrier between the site and neighboring properties. Existing plans for off-site improvements, and recommended revisions to plans for access (vehicular and pedestrian) , signage and exterior lighting will increase the ambience of the development, and improve safety in the area. • Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 5 3) Traffic Circulation • Traffic circulation impacts are addressed in Section 9. f. below. 4) Noise, Light and Glare Noise, light and glare impacts are addressed in Section 9.h. below. 5) Public Services/Utilities Public service/utilities impacts are addressed in Section 9. i. below. 6) Natural Environment The eastern section of the subject property is steeply sloped (50%) and is covered with natural vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground cover) . The applicant has endeavored to protect the features of this area through maintenance of the slope and vegetation, through separation of the developed section of the site by screening with a retention wall and fencing, and through selection of a storm drainage management system which will minimize run-off onto the sloped area, thereby reducing the likelihood of damage to neighboring properties or the site through erosion of the slope. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Potential impacts to the site, have been identified by staff with respect to aesthetics, noise, light and glare, traffic, public services/utilities and earth/natural environment: 1) Aesthetics The site plan, as proposed by the applicant and/or as recommended by staff, is intended to provide an integrated design theme and a pleasant, efficient environment for employees and visitors. The structure is proposed to have attractive, durable exterior facades of stucco. There will be ample on-site parking. The structure will be linked to parking areas and to the adjacent right-of-way with pedestrian pathways. Open areas and landscaping design will be revised to improve the appearance of the site and to provide on-site amenities for employees (a roof-top garden and/or outside seating adjacent to the structure) . As the slope and natural vegetation present on the eastern section of the property will be retained, that area will also provide a view corridor. 2) Traffic Circulation Traffic impacts are evaluated below in Section 9. f. of this report. 3) Noise, Light and Glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated below in Section 9.h. of this report. Site Plan Review Commit 3 Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 6 4) Public Services/Utilities • Public service/utilities impacts (particularly recreation impacts and storm drainage management systems development) are addressed in Section 9. i. of this report. 5) Natural Environment As noted previously, development on the subject parcel will be confined to the western portion of the site, an area which is essentially flat and level (maximum slope is 5% -- terrain is generally gently rolling in character) . The eastern portion of the site, which is sloped to approximately 50%, will be maintained with natural vegetation, separated with screening, and protected from erosion with a storm drainage management system designed to address site characteristics. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The planned office project is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since the development is proposed/recommended to be designed to: 1) improve an undeveloped parcel of land; 2) create an attractive, efficient development on the site; and 3) be compatible with uses on neighboring properties. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation: Based upon ITE reports, staff anticipate that the proposed project will generate approximately 175 ADWVTE, including employee travel 7.7 trips x an estimated maximum 20 employees -- plus visitors. The anticipated number of trips can be accommodated on adjacent Taylor Avenue and other nearby roadways without reducing levels of service or otherwise having a significant impact upon vehicle/pedestrian circulation with mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee for this development. (See Section 3 . ) Additionally, on-site traffic impacts can be mitigated so that vehicular and pedestrian safety are protected, by the development of a revised circulation plan, including some modifications to parking areas, access and maneuvering routes, pedestrian linkage, and lighting/signage plans. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed development has been designed and sited so that there is provision of abundant light and air on the site and on neighboring parcels. For example, the structure is well- separated from neighboring residential developments to the south and to the west (across Taylor Avenue) . As previously noted, property to the north -- which will be separated from the site by a substantial landscaping buffer -- is developed with a vehicle storage lot; commercially developed property to the east is separated from this proposed office complex by the previously described steep, vegetated slope. Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 7 h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthful conditions; - 1) Construction Construction activities will generate some noise, dust and debris to the site and the surrounding area. Mitigation measures recommended in conjunction with environmental review (See Section 3 above) are sufficient to address impacts upon adjacent residential developments and rights- of-way from construction of the proposed improvements. 2) Operation The proposed office development -- which is planned to employ approximately 20 persons -- is anticipated to experience some noise impacts from the nearby Renton Municipal Airport operations. Staff believe that the requirement that the structure be constructed in a manner which limits interior noise levels to 50 dBA should mitigate interference from flight activities upon business operations at this office complex. As a result of the proposed separation of the structure from abutting properties and the recommended improvements to the landscaping plan, no undue light or glare impacts are anticipated from nearby activities upon the site. Noise impacts from the development to abutting residences are not anticipated to be more significant than noise generated from the nearby commercial developments, arterials (N.W. 4th Street, Rainier Avenue) , or from the Renton Municipal Airport. Those impacts which do occur are likely to be notable only at the beginning and the end of the business day as employees enter and leave the site. Building set back and insulation should serve to modulate sounds emanating from the structure to neighboring properties. Light and glare impacts from traffic are not expected to be substantially different from the type and level of impacts now present in the area. Landscaping should serve to provide a visual barrier against light/glare between the subject site and abutting properties. Judicious placement and direction of exterior illumination on the site should further reduce off-site light/glare impacts. Light and glare generated from the structure can be addressed by the selection and use of appropriate window coverings. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Development of the proposed office complex, with recommended environmental conditions (See Section 3) and land use mitigation measures is not generally expected to create an undue burden on public services and facilities in the area. 1) Public Services Neither the Police Department nor the Fire Prevention Bureau has indicated that the proposed facility would place a major burden on their respective services if Code provisions (e.g. signage, lighting) are addressed. Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 8 The Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning Division recommended the addition of on-site recreational amenities -- such as a roof garden, outdoor seating, picnic tables -- for employees of the complex as there are limited off-site facilities available in the area of the subject property. 2) Public Utilities The site is adequately served by utilities lines (water mains, sanitary sewers) with connection requirements as stipulated by City Ordinance and Code. Storm drainage management can be achieved for this site. However, because of the steeply sloped terrain on the eastern portion of the site, there are some special requirements for drainage systems development and implementation. Staff has established conditions in conjunction with the above-described Determination of Non-Significance (See Section 3) to ensure protection of the site as a whole during construction and during operation of the proposed office development, with particularly attention to protection of the sloped area against erosion or run-off impacts from the developed/impervious portion of the site. These measures are anticipated to serve, as well, to protect neighboring properties from impacts related to the proposed development. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is expected to have a generally positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing for. an attractive development on a now vacant parcel and by making efficient use of a property which is conveniently located to serve the community. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal (with recommended modifications) generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on were: a. Compatibility of the proposed development with neighboring uses. b. Aesthetics c. Traffic circulation d. Storm drainage management e. Protection of the natural terrain f. Provision of adequate recreational amenities 3 . The proposal does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of medium density multi-family residential use, but does comply with the Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for commercial uses and with the underlying land use zoning designation. Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 9 Decision: • The site plan for the Forrester Building, file no. SA 053-89, is subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant shall comply with conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on June 28, 1989 (as amended July 15, 1989) , in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 2 . That the applicant shall provide a revised site plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and recreation impacts, which includes on-site recreational amenities (e.g. outdoor picnic tables and/or a roof garden with seating and accessible on a regular basis to employees) , subject to the approval of the Planning Division and (in the event that a roof garden is the preferred option) the Building Division. 3. That the applicant shall insulate the building to achieve interior noise levels of 50 dBA or less. 4. That the applicant shall provide a revised lighting plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and light and glare impacts, which depicts full illumination of the site for efficient, safe operations and which directs lighting fixtures to contain direct light and glare impacts on-site. This plan shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 5. That the applicant shall provide a revised sign plan to architecturally integrate building signage as well as address the siting illumination levels of any free standing signage. This plan shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division in advance of the issuance of building permits. 6. That the applicant shall provide a revised landscaping plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic, housing and light and glare impacts, which includes: 1) a fifteen foot wide landscaping strip along the southern perimeter of the property (or a five foot wide strip and six foot high fencing) ; 2) redesigns conifer screening on the north side of the parking garage to improve visibility in order to reduce potential for crimes against persons or property; and 3) relocates the handicapped access route away 'from the required landscaping corridor. These revisions are, required so that the plan will be in compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance and in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts to the site and neighboring properties. This plan shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 7 . That the applicant shall provide a landscaping performance bond, in the amount of $3, 000. 00, to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the protection of the landscaping materials and the landscaping irrigation system. The bond should be provided in advance of the granting of the Certificate of Occupancy, and should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. For the purpose ur of this decision, the term "should" and "shall" P P are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision August 16, 1989 - Page 10 Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. ORDERED this 15th day of August, n behalf o/ g - • e Plan Review Committee. Donald K. r ckson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this 17th day of August, 1989 to the parties of record: Richard Person P.O. Box 156 Rolling Bay, WA 98061 Michael Forrester 1522 N. Brooks Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 17th day of August, 1989 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Larry Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before September 1, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on September 1, 1989 accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. Site Plan Review Commit Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 11 THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. s 41/V 1=3 mr 1 14 August 1989 Box 15B Rolling Bay Washington 98061 [MOB 3 eXCORGERKS City of Renton - Planning Division 842-2116 200 Mill Ave. South 232-6472 Renton, Washington 98055 attn.: Ms. Lenora Blauman Our Project # 8902 Re: Forrester Office Building Taylor Ave. NW ECF: SA 053-89 Ms. Blauman; We have just received the latest revision to the proposed covenant on this project (copy enclosed) . After having discussions with our client, we find that, while it is not a perfect solution for this project, it is acceptable, and we will therefore, -not be appealing this to the Hearings Examiner. It is our understanding that the project will not require a public hearing and can be finalized adminsitratively as we have discussed. If you have further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. We will be proceeding into the contract document phase of this project immediately. S n erely, • ichard W: Person, AIA Richard Person Architect cc: Mike Forrester LL+S v O r. encl. CITY • ,) . AUG 15 1989 i E r 7 ] i a 1 1 I y ti FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING SA-053-89 PROPOSED COVENANT Specific wording of the covenant is recommended below: (*) That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development on the property to office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to personal service offices (4-711, B. 1.b.2) which generate limited non-employee traffic. Professional offices (4-711 B. l�.b.3 . ) would be prohibited. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limit traffic intrusion to adjacent local roadways, and to limit noise, light and glare impacts caused by vehicular traffic. This covenant should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Note: Permitted uses could include, but not be limited to, developments such as accounting services, architects, computer software development, engineering services. Prohibited uses would include, but not be limited to, developments such as medical and dental offices. ) Language of covenant approved by Lawrence Warren, City Attorney, on July 26, 1989. Richard W. Person AIA P.O.Box 156 Rolling Bay, Washington 98061 CITY OFmaim : E C E I V E D AUG 1 4 1989 • 1 BUILDING DIVISION City of Renton - Planning Division 200 Mill Ave South Renton, Washington 98055 attn.: Ms.Lenora Blauman OF REN OINK August 11, 1989 in) � � AUG a 0 1989 1-1 AEC Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: Forrester Office Building Taylor Avenue N.E. Renton, Wa. City of Renton Ref. File: ECF, SA 053-89 .mDear Mr. Erickson, I am the owner of the above real estate in the City of Renton and have a sale now pending closing to Mr. Michael J. Forrester as purchaser. The closing is being delayed if not terminated because of your proposed Condition No. 5 of the report by your environmental Review Committee. I have discussed the proposed Restrictive Covenant with Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner on your staff, and she has agreed to strike that part of the Restrictive Covenant which would require approval of the Planning Commission in advance of each proposed change of renters within the project when completed. That language was an unacceptable burden on the project and in our opinion was arbitrary, capricious and constituted an unlawful inter- ference with the land usage. I also wish to point out that your present proposal contains a note that permitted uses would include accounting services, architects, computer soft- ware development, and engineering services. However, there is a conflicting sentence in the proposed Restrictive Covenant, namely "Professional offices would be prohibited." That is not acceptable to me and if it, or the Restrictive Covenant, is the occasion for the buyer's refusal to close, will -constitute a cause of action against the City of Renton for damages suffered by me for this illegal interference with the present zoning of my real estate upon which the sale was predicated. I will be pleased to work with your staff to develop language which will be acceptable. Ve ruly y u�s, Dean W. Bitney 108 Factory Ave. No. S e. 2 Renton, Wa. 98055 255-1325 cc: Murray, Dunham & Murray, Attorneys at Law Lawrence Warren, City of Renton Attorney Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON August 11, 1989 0 n AUG 1 0 1989 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. So. Renton, Wa. 98055 RE: Forrester Office Building Taylor Avenue N.E. Renton, Wa. City of Renton Ref.. File: ECF, SA 053-89 Dear Mr. Erickson, I am the owner of the above real estate in the City of Renton and have a sale now pending closing to Mr. Michael J. Forrester as purchaser. The closing is being delayed if not terminated because of your proposed Condition No. 5 of the report by your environmental Review Committee. I have discussed the proposed Restrictive Covenant with Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner on your staff, and she has agreed to strike that part of the Restrictive Covenant which would require approval of the Planning Commission in advance of each proposed change of renters within the project when completed. That language was an unacceptable burden on the project and in our opinion was arbitrary, capricious and constituted an unlawful inter- ference with the land usage. I also wish to point out that your present proposal contains a note that permitted uses would include accounting services, architects, computer soft- ware development, and engineering services. However, there is a conflicting sentence in the proposed Restrictive Covenant, namely "Professional offices would be prohibited:" That is not acceptable to me and if it, or the Restrictive Covenant, is the occasion for the buyer's refusal to close, will -constitute a cause of action against the City of Renton for damages suffered by me for this illegal interference with the present zoning of my real estate upon which the sale was predicated. I will be pleased to work with your staff to develop language which will be acceptable. Ve ruly y u s, .�v G Dean W. Bitney 108 Factory Ave. No. S e. 2 Renton, Wa. 98055 255-1325 cc: Murray, Dunham & Murray, Attorneys at Law Lawrence Warren, City of Renton Attorney Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING SA-053-89 PROPOSED COVENANT Specific wording of the covenant is recommended below: (*) That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development on the property to office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to personal service offices (4-711, B. l.b.2) which generate limited non-employee traffic. Professional offices (4-711 B. 1.b.3 . ) would be prohibited. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limit traffic intrusion to adjacent local roadways, and to limit noise, light and glare impacts caused by vehicular traffic. This covenant should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. (Note: Permitted uses could include, but not be limited to, developments such as accounting services, architects, computer software development, engineering services. Prohibited uses would include, but not be limited to, developments such as medical and dental offices. ) Language of covenant approved by Lawrence Warren, City Attorney, on July 26, 1989. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) (RECONSIDERATION)_ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks reconsideration of Condition No. 5 regarding a required covenant for site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 Square foot, two-story office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Taylor Avenue N.E. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . CorOitions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee on June 28, 1989 under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Upon request by the proponents during the comment period, the ERC reconsidered Condition No. 5 on July 19, 1989 (see attached) . The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5: 00 PM on August 14, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: July 31, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: July 19, 198 SIGNATURES: Nyber Lynn utttann Commu y De o ;-Dee Publ Wo ks. Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED • MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: 1 Forrester Office Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-053-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot, two-story office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Taylor Avenue N.E. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. RECOMMENDATIONS: The ERC recommends issuing a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a traffic mitigation plan for improvements to Taylor Avenue (including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting and paving) , subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 2 . That the applicant develop 'a storm water drainage management plan, subject. to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3 . That the applicant develop a construction mitigation plan including the following: a) erosion control plans; b) plan for delineation of hours of operation; and c) plan -for hauling routes/hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of. site preparation permits, and is subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Police Department. 4 . That the applicant provide a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2, 000. 00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. This bond should be secured prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. 5. That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development on the property to office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to personal service. offices (4-711, B. l.b.2) which generate limited non- employee traffic, subject . to the approval of the Planning Division. Professional offices (4-711 B. l.b.3. ) would be prohibited. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limit traffic intrusion to adjacent local roadways, and to limit noise, light and glare impacts caused by vehicular traffic. This covenant should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Mitigation Measures Page 2 (Note: Permitted uses would include accounting services, architects, computer software development, engineering services. Prohibited uses would include medical and dental offices) . (*) Language of covenant approved by Lawrence Warren, City Attorney, on July 26, 1989. Note:, At the time of site plan review, conditions will be established, including, but not limited to the following 1. That the applicant provide a revised sign plan to address Zoning Ordinance criteria for design and location of signs. 2 . That the applicant provide a revised site plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and recreation impacts, which includes on-site recreational amenities (e.g. outdoor picnic tables and/or a roof garden) , in advance of land use public hearing review, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and (in the event that a roof garden is the preferred option) the Public Works . Department and the Building Division. 3 . . That the applicant provideIa revised lighting plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and light and glare impacts; which depicts full illumination of the site for efficient, safe operations and which directs lighting fixtures to address off-site light and glare impacts. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, 'and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 4 . That the applicant provide a revised landscaping plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic,. housing and light and glare impacts, which. includes: a) a fifteen foot wide landscaping strip along the southern perimeter of the property (or a five foot wide strip and six foot high fencing) ; b) redesigns conifer screening on the north side of the parking garage to improve visibility in order to reduce potential for crimes against persons or property; and c) relocates the handicapped access route away from the required landscaping corridor. These revisions are required so that the plan will be in compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance and in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts to the site and neighboring properties. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 5. That the applicant provide a landscaping performance bond, in the amount of $3, 000. 00, to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the protection of the landscaping materials and the landscaping irrigation system. The bond should be provided in advance of the granting of the Certificate of Occupancy, and should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. mmdoc (__ N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION v• • APPLICATION NO. ECF-053-89 • APPLICANT FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING (RECONSIDERATION) • RICHARD PERSON PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROXIMATELY 7,400 SQ.FT. , TWO—STORY OFFICE BUILDING (WITH SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND PARKING) ON VACANT PROPERTY IN THE B-1 ZONE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS TAYLOR AVENUE N.E. BETWEEN N.W. 4TH STREET AND N.W. 4TH PLACE. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. • • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE • • (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION • DOES 0414 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL 1K WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS • • PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., AUGUST 14. 1989 • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION • I , )1q,i-� S �ln, , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 COPIES OF • • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN ! .3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED I PROPERTY ON /}ca<., /, ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington ' • p residing in3N , on the /s;r SIGNED : .'12ctizy lama. day of "nT,J N OT C E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 1 APPLICATION NO. ECF-053-89 APPLICANT FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING (RECONSIDERATION) RICHARD PERSON PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROXIMATELY 7, 400 SQ.FT. , TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING (WITH SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND PARKING) ON VACANT PROPERTY IN THE B-1 ZONE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS TAYLOR AVENUE N.E. BETWEEN N.W. 4TH STREET AND N.W. 4TH PLACE. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES I DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL ^WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., AUGUST 14, 1989 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. 'i 1 0 ii 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL E 11 e n e Lavine ,beingfirst dulysworn on oath states DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has, upon request by the propo- VALLEYDAILY NEWS nents, reconsidered certain mitigated con- ditions for the following projects previously • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition issued a Determination of Non-Signifi- cance-Mitigated under the authority of the DailyRentonewspapers six (6) times a week. That said newspapers FORRnTER Municipal Code. publishedFORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ECF; SA-053-89 months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Applicant seeks site plan approval for in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kingdevelopmentqro of an approximately (with gKent, square foot, two-story office building (with County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal surface and underground parking) on newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for vacant property in the TaylorB-1 Avenuev. The prop. arty is located on N.E. King County. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition HAZAc DOUS MATERIALS CHECKPOINT , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition , (and not in ECF-(41-89 supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-functioning hazardous materials during the below stated period. The annexed notice a receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single checkpoint in an existing build- Notice of 7nvironmental Determination ing. The checkpoint will be composed of two adjacent sections including: a) an indoor facility of 1800 square feet, and b) was published on July 31 , 1989 R3644 - an outside facility of 1600 square feet.The property is located at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. Further information regarding this action The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, sum of$ 3,3 • 5 Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on August 14, 1989 oy aphep Ci y f this decision may be made to the Cit s HearingExaminer, Municipal Buiding, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination Subscribed and sworn before me this 3 1 day of July 19 3"4 4 • should be revised and must be accompa- nied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published in the Valley Daily News July 31, 1989. R3644 Notary for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has, upon request by the proponents, reconsidered certain mitigated conditions for the following projects previously issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING „L ECF; SA-053-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot, two-story office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. The property is located on Taylor Avenue N.E. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECKPOINT ECF-041-89 Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single checkpoint in an existing building. The checkpoint will be composed of two adjacent sections including: a) an indoor facility of 1800 square feet, and b) an outside facility of 1600 square feet. The property is located at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 PM on August 14, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: July 31, 1989 11 CITY OF RENTON .'LL _` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 31, 1989 Richard Person P.O. Box 156 Rolling Bay, WA 98061 Re: Forrester Office Building Taylor Avenue N.W. ECF; SA 053-89 Dear Mr. Person: The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has, upon request by the applicant, reconsidered Condition No. 5 of the mitigated conditions for the above project previously issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. On July 19, 1989 Condition No. 5 was revised as follows: That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development on the property to office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to personal service offices (4-711, B.l.b.2) which generate limited non-employee traffic, subject to the approval of the Planning Division. Professional offices (4-711 B.l.b.3.) would be prohibited. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limit traffic intrusion to adjacent local roadways, and to limit noise, light and glare impacts caused by vehicular traffic. This covenant should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. • (Note: Permitted uses would include accounting services, architects, computer software development, engineering services. Prohibited uses would include medical and dental offices). (*) Language of covenant approved by Lawrence Warren, City Attorney, on July 26, 1989. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 PM on August 14, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Richard Person Forrester Office Building July 31, 1989 Page 2 • If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please contact Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner and project manager for this project, at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committees, Sincerely, r Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Michael Forrester 1522 N. Brooks Renton, WA 98055 a ® CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney rLL Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean - Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell, Assistant City Attorneys CITY OF RENTON July 27, 1989 i'V � JUL 2 8 1989 011 r7,2 !Ih i' TO: Lenora Blauman, Assistant Planner FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney • RE: ERC Consideration of a Condition for Placement of a Covenant on the Forrester Office Building (SA 053-89) Dear Lenora: I have reviewed the above-captioned covenant and the same is approved as to legal form. C--"/ Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as . cc: Mayor A8 .45 :49 . • • Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 -::METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 July 20, 1989 Environmental Review Committee t,�, MIL 2 4 19s9 c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator \317\ Vi \} Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No: ECF-053-89 Richard Person Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4933 . • /` . WWashington State Duane Berentson AO Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place July 18, 1989 Bellevue,Washington 98007-6538 (206)562-4000 Don Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SR 167 MP 27 .70 CS 1716 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance Forrester Office Building File No. SA-053-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the Determination of Non Significance (Mitigated) we received from the city of Renton on July 10, 1989. The proposal is for an approximately 7400 square foot, two- story office building on ' Taylor Avenue NE between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place. If any channelization work is required on a state highway, the plan is to be submitted to the state for review and approval before work is commenced. If a state highway is designated in the haul plan the state would appreciate being a participant in the review and bonding process of the plan, particularly if the haul route extends beyond the corporate limits of the City of Renton. Normally, the Department of Transportation recommends that the developer commission a traffic study to determine if 10 or more peak hour trips (AM or PM) , will travel through a single state intersection. If this condition is found to be true, a traffic analysis should be prepared using current volumes at the intersection(s) . The analysis should calculate the LOS at the, intersections impacted by 10 or more peak hour trips for the existing condition and the design year of the development. The analysis should include figures illustrating directional distribution, background traffic, development traffic, and future traffic. The analysis should assess the need for mitigation, check the turning radii for the types of vehicles utilizing the development, and check . the sight distances at each intersection. Don Erickson July 18, 1989 Page 2 If the traffic study does show an impact at a state highway intersection, the Department of Transportation would appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the mitigation measures proposed in the traffic study. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. Should you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel free to call Donald Hurter ( 562-4274) or Dick Aust ( 562- 4274) of my Developer section, or myself ( 562-4267) . Sincerely, G7/ J ES L. LUTZ, .E. tilities/Developer Services Engineer DA:da cc: WSDOT State Aid - MS 121 11 July 1989 JUL .•v,, A� ' 3 � Cityof Renton 989 Box 156 hin Rolling Bay El ye a Washington - •.. Planning Division Fo C 206' _ ''' '�'��t- " 200 Mill Ave. South 842-2116 Renton, Washington 98055 232-6472 attn.: Ms. Lenora Blauman Re: Forrester Office Building Our Project # 8902 Taylor Ave. NW ECF; SA 053-89 Ms. Blauman, We appreciate the work of the Environmental Review Committee in issueing a "Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated" on the. above referenced project. After reviewing your letter of July 3, 1989, we submit the following listed responces as comments or answers to the listed conditions. The numbering is the same as in your letter. 1 . A traffic mitigation plan will be provided for improvements to Taylor Ave. in accordance with the requirements of the Public Works Department. 2. A storm water management plan will be provided and will be in accordance with the requirements of the Public Works Department. 3. A Construction mitigation plan including erosion control, hours of operation, and hauling routes/time plan, will be provided prior to permit issuance and will meet the requirements of the Public Works Department and the Police Department. 4. A street clean-up bond in the amount of $2,000.00 will be provided for in the Contract Documents of this project and will be submitted prior to permit issuance. 5. The condition of providing a covenant as outlined is unacceptable to the applicant and requires re-consideration by the Committee. The proposed professional office building is not a large traffic generator and traffic will generally be in the opposite direction than that generated by the neighboring multi-family occupancies. Additionally, there is a minor arterial in Taylor Place NW, located approximately 200 feet to the south and the major arterial of Rainier Avenue located a block to the east. To require a covenant as outlined will adversely affect the value of the subject property and the economic viability of the project as a whole. It is the intent of the applicant to house his computer software business in the structure and lease the upper floor to professional tenants until such time that his business requires additional space. To require that these businesses not be allowed to generate "any" non- employee traffic is inappropriate and unacceptable. • 11 July 1989 City of Renton Planning Division page 2 In responce to probable staff recommended conditions, the following comments are listed. 1 . Final designs for signage will be provided prior to sign permit applications and will meet the requirements of the Sign and Zoning Ordinances. 2. An outdoor picnic area will be provided for on a revised site plan. 3. Lighting locations will be shown on the revised site plan and will mitigate concern for light and glare on neighboring properties. 4. Landscape plan will be revised at time of permit application to reflect these items. The plan currently shows the 5 ft. setback and fence along the south property line. The conifer schrubery screening at the parking garage backs up to an existing chain link fence which provides some protection, but can be modified if necessary. The location of the handicap ramp will be modified to leave the landscape buffer intact. 5. A landscape performance bond in the amount of $3000.00 will be included in the contract documents of the project and provided in advance to granting of the Certificate of Occupancy. Time is of the essence to this project, so any method for speeding up the process will be appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. inc r ' y, Richard W. Person, AIA Richard Person Architect '----7;21 - Mike Forr to Artificial Intelligence Inc. • 40 !'` CITY OF RENTON .y„ � .rv•� 014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division • July 3, 1989 • Washington State Department.of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on June 28,1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MATHEWSON AUTOMOTIVE ECF; SA-043-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for an approximately 10,000 square foot automotive service/retail sales office development. The property is located at 271 Rainier Avenue North. FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING • ECF; SA-053-89 Applicant seeks site plan.approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. The property is located on Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place. SOUND AUTO • ECF; SA-057-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B-1) zone on a 1.58 acre property. The property is located at the northeast corner of Rainier, Avenue South and South Seventh Street. BAKKE REZONE -. ECF-I07-88 ' Applications for approvals to allow:1)/a rezone from G-1, General Use to R-3, Residential- Multiple Family and B-1, Business Use; 2) a four lot subdivision; and 3) a site plan showing a portion of the site developed with a commercial development with 21, 400 square feet and the remainder of the site developed with a 111 unit multiple family residential complex. The property is located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 300 feet east of Union Ave. N.E. .inn p.t:n e..__• ., --. .i - • �1 Environmental Determinations July 3, 1989 • Page,2 The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on July 18, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. . c • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James L. Lutz, Department of Transportation • • - NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION RENTON,ENVIRONMENTAL WASHINVIEWGTON COMMITTEE, ironmewCo• mmittee Environmental Review Committee Audrey Benner (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-. being first duly sworn on oath states Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the jects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. ' ' MATHEWSON AUTOMOTIVE(ECF;SA- VALLEY DAILY NEWS Opplica43-89) i t",,l,n z for an seeks site plan approval. for an • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition approximately 10,000 square foot`automo- tive service/retail sales office development. The property is located at 271 Rainier Ave- -Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers nue North: •'', • FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING.(ECF; are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six SA-053-89),r ;c' .-•,, , ,' months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Applicant seeks;site plan approval,for in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, Kin development of: an'approximately.7400 g square ,foot office building (with surface County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal and underground parking) on vacant prop- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for prop- erty on the B 1 en a NW propertyetwe is 4th King County. ed on Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place. , SOUND AUTO(ECF; SA-057-89) devel- The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition oApplicant seeks site plan approval to, Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition room/exterior an automobile dealership(interior show- , (B-1) (and not in - lot) in the Commercial (B-1) supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers zone on a 1.58 acre property.The property during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Is located at the northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street.. Public Notice BAKKE REZONE(ECF-107-88) Applications:for'approvals to"allow:1) a`"' rezone from G-1,General Use to R-3,Resi- was published on July 3, 1989 R5 265 dentlal-Multiple Family and B=1,Business 4,1 Use;2)a four lot subdivision;and 3)a site ?, plan showing a portion of the site devel- ' oped with a,commercial development with '' 21, 400.square feet,and the remainder,of 1, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the the site developed with a 111 unit multiple 1 sum of$ 4 4 . 2 2 family residential complex. The property is : located on the south side of N.E.4th Street approximately 300 feet past of Union Ave.r4 N.E. y.. ;';;:tti. This decision will be finalized In 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., July 18, 1989 will not be considered:,A fourteen (14) day appeal'period will corn-, Subscribed and sworn before me this 19 t h Jul 1 y g g mence following the finalization of DNS-M.• day of j 9 The mitigation measures imposed by the City of.Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. PublishedJuly 3, 1989Valley Daily P✓. - News R5285, Nd ary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 • }; NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL. DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON wi The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a:Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MATHEWSON AUTOMOTIVE ECF; SA-043-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for an.approximately 10,000 square foot automotive service/retail sales office development. The property is located at 271 Rainier Avenue North. FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING i ECF; SA-053-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. The property is located on Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place. SOUND AUTO ECF; SA-057-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B-1) zone on a 1.58 acre property. The property is located at the northeast corner •of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. BAKKE REZONE ECF-107-88 Applications for approvals to allow:l) a rezone from G-1, General Use to R-3, Residential-Multiple Family and B-1, Business Use; 2) a four lot subdivision; and 3) a site plan showing a portion of the site developed with a commercial development with 21, 400 square feet and the remainder of the site developed with a 111 unit multiple family residential complex. The property is located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 300 feet east of Union Ave. N.E. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., July 18, 1989 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055,. Phone: 235-2550. • • Published: July 3, 1989 . ,. , • . ,-- . ...,.....'...,... ,,...., , ....., , ••'.:.'•1'? .- • ' • , , ....., ...,,,, • • fi':-' , • 1.,,":., . , . ' . .. . . , .. .. , .. , • • . ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION . , . . .. • . . I.,,, •. • ' . . . 1.1 . ' • .. •. 1 • ... .: • .- •. , . • ••0.•, . ., . • it . . . ,•• .: . . .:.. ... . ri • • • . ' •I,. . . . • 1 i....: •• . • I; APPLICATION NO. •• _•-•• ' • , ,. .. . .. : ECF-05-3-89, SA-053-89 1: ' - . • , , .-- : • . APPLICANT '2L.._._. . FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING PROPbSED ACM I HARD' PERSON V .! • - ' N - 1 • I:. . , ... . APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN-APPROVAL FOR ••• DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROXIMATELY 7400 SQ.FT. OFFICE BUILDING (WITH - . . r: . • SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND PARKING) ON VACANT PROPERTY IN THE B-1 I:, • .' ' • 76EFIERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS te , ., • . . i.f.... •;; .•• . ,•1 • .• F TAYLOR AVENUE NW -BETWEEN NW 4TH-STREET AND NW 4TH PLACE. . -. • '•••• . . • •••• • : •POSTED TO- NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS • it • • • OF AN- ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. - i::• ! - !.:: .• . . 7.- . . . (..• ..4 . • . •2•• • • , I . • • THE CITY OF RENTON-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE i; . •,. ' . (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINEDT.HAT.,.THE: . . , i'$. ; . ' • . PROPOSED ACTION:::-..f.........=-...,-- " - — I"! : " • .-.,..._.. , __,_ •••• • • • - -• --- .. : DOES ' DOES NOT • ,. ..' • ••,. . • t. . HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. . e, • '.' •.. .: ••• • • I. • . et• • , AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT . • . . • . , I:. . WiL9 WILL NOT • ' :i •• • .4 • . " ., BE REQUIRED. •. • i . , • • . ;:i... •: .• . . . .. • •.' •••• THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS i .. PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS 1 FROM THE DATE BELOW. •.;•. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • • . i . P •• . JULY 18, 1989 . ' • e• 1-• ' ,.. , • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY • . BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • •; BY 5:00 P.M., • • , , , .. •. • . ! FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON . PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. • , .. , . • DO.NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE ... . . • .• . WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • _ .... , ,••• .•. ..-. ' . .:';',':', -, '. ' '•' -::,. ,:,:.4: ..,.: .. • . ir,,: ... . . • . ...`,.:::-.,1::, .' •. 1••': ' ''.: :...,'':-...' : •''.,•4,,i,,: ..-.‘., , ,.:. •- : . ::::,i'.;:':4 . , L,, ., :,,,:,-,,,:.-,•::'. :;;'.:4::': ,.:-,.:. .'‘,";,,-; .' .'. . _ ', '.:1,: '-,:- ' ,.•:!::1:1.' ': :'‘.-•'' 11:: .,..:.' . . • • . . • i.•.. . . , : . :'•'.k . , „ 1. . ''. . . ,....• • ;?....,E: •, . •:: .• ,,,‘.::: : :,,:.,• ....,... , •, • , . . , • • ..., • . '.;:,1,. . .,, r) , , . :V• .:;''', ''H: '': . 1,,,,:ki :, .., .: ,i,5,.V: ... :':•. .iii ',.; :'i.: : , . , ,, : ,,• • ,Ii•-• ,:. L.:• . . • '' ' ' ,' '""4..:.';',:' :"., '.' " ' ' ...•.‘Off ,:• :.,••,•• ,'1.;'-ti';,-• '',.:V•' P'..' ,:i:. ..•;• .•:-.;;• ,••••. . ... . . . .; •i... ' • '. :'''':::'. • •1: : ' ,• :. . C'E Wt ' 1:10 ''/,'':' ''''''" .4. .•..i.'• ''• • ::'-.:2 ' ••• e1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT !:','• I HE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IIN 3 • • . — ---___ CUPIES OF 1 ,------____________' 3 CUNSP ICUOUS • .., . i•• • ;;•• LACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED. PROPERTY ON ;"S• iIsc,____L:________ ;;..• . i.-• r..- • • ' • (.•.:i.. . . ATTEST: subscribed sod sworn to before me a r.,. Notary Public, .1ri and f r the State of. Liash'Ir4ton • ..4..:'., residing • , on • , 1... . ._._. . ,..4 1 • ,.. •.._ __,___....e. __2 __ __ . ff . ..„.,. ,..„ .. , ‘ ; ---7- . tho ;�, CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 3, 1989 Richard Person P.O. Box 156 Rolling Bay, WA 98061 Re: Forrester Office Building Taylor Avenue N.W. ECF; SA 053-89 Dear Mr. Person: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on June 28, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a traffic mitigation plan for improvements to Taylor Avenue (including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting and paving), subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 2. That the applicant develop a storm water drainage management plan, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3. That the applicant develop a construction mitigation plan including the following: a) erosion control plans; b) plan for delineation of hours of operation; and c) plan for hauling routes/hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of site preparation permits, and is subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Police Department. 4. That the applicant provide a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2,000.00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. This bond should be secured prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washinnton; 9R055 - (906121c-7ccn Richard Person - Forrester Office Building July 3, 1989 Page 2 • 5. That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development on the subject property to general office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to those which do not generate any non-employee traffic. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limiting traffic intrusion to the adjacent local roadways. This covenant should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Note: At the time of site plan review, staff will probably recommend conditions, including, but not limited to the following: 1. That the applicant provide a revised sign plan to address Zoning Ordinance criteria for design and location of signs. 2. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and recreation impacts, which includes on-site recreational amenities (e.g. outdoor picnic tables and/or a roof garden), in advance of land use public hearing review, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and (in the event that a roof garden is the preferred option) the Public Works Department and the Building Division. 3. That the applicant provide a revised lighting plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and light and glare impacts, which depicts full illumination of the site for efficient, safe operations and which directs lighting fixtures to address off-site light and glare impacts. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 4. That the applicant provide a revised landscaping plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic, housing and light and glare impacts, which includes: a) a fifteen foot wide landscaping strip along the southern perimeter of the property (or a five foot wide strip and six foot high fencing); b) redesigns conifer screening on the north side of the parking garage to improve visibility in order to reduce potential for crimes against persons or property; and c) relocates the handicapped access route away from the required landscaping corridor. These revisions are required so that the plan will be in•compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance and in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts to the site and neighboring properties. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 5. That the applicant provide a landscaping performance bond, in the amount of $3,000.00, to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the protection of the landscaping materials and the landscaping irrigation system. The bond should be provided in advance of the granting of the Certificate of Occupancy, and should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. f e • Richard Person - Forrester Office Building July 3, 1989 Page 3 Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end July 18, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. Because Land Use Review for this project has not yet been completed, staff is unable to establish fully detailed mitigation plans at this time. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements which are likely to be recommended for this project. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for Lenora Blauman or me. For the Environmental Review Committee, • cere , 1(22, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Michael Forrester 1522 N. Brooks Renton, WA 98055 . •�ay CITY OF RENTON , DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot, two-story office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION OF. PROPOSAL: Taylor Avenue N.E. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the . environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, thellead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from July 3, 1989. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , July 18, 1989, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development_Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: July 3, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: June 28, 1989 SIGNATURES: L � / n Nybe - Lyn G ttmann Community De el6piie`nt rector Pu 1 'c orks Director . r DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Forrester Office Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: . ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-053-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for 'development of an approximately 7400 square foot, two-story office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Taylor Avenue N.E. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. RECOMMENDATIONS: The ERC recommends issuing a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following j conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a traffic mitigation plan for improvements to Taylor Avenue (including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, lighting and paving) , subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 2. That the applicant develop a storm water drainage management plan, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department and in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3 . That the applicant develop 'a construction mitigation plan including the following: a), erosion control plans;. b) plan for delineation of hours of operation; and c) plan for hauling routes/hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of site preparation permits, and is subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Police Department. 4. That the applicant provide a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2 , 000. 00, subject to the approval of the City Attorney. This bond should be secured prior to the issuance of site preparation permits. 5. That the applicant enter into a covenant, to run with the land, restricting development oncthe subjiect property to general office uses and restricting the types of office uses permitted to those which do not generate any non-employee traffic. This restrictive covenant is sought in order to protect the residential character of nearby housing developments from excessive vehicular trips and limiting traffic intrusion to the adjacent local roadways. This covenant should be subject , to the approval of the City Attorney, and should be filed with King County and the City of Renton in advance of the issuance of ' site preparation/building permits. Note: At the time of site plan review, conditions will be established, including, but not limited to the following Mitigation Measure. Page 2 H 1. That the applicant provide la revised sign plan to address Zoning Ordinance criteria for design and location of signs. 2. That the applicant provide ,a revised site plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and recreation impacts, which includes on-site recreational amenities (e.g. outdoor picnic tables and/or a roof garden) , in advance of land use public hearing review, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and (in the event that a roof garden is the preferred option) the Public Works Department and the Building Division. , 3. That the applicant provide a revised lighting plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic and light and glare impacts, which depicts full illumination of the site for efficient, safe operations and which directs lighting fixtures to address off-site light and glare impacts. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Division. 4 . That the applicant provide a revised landscaping plan, in order to mitigate aesthetic, housing and light and glare impacts, which includes: a) a fifteen foot wide landscaping strip along the southern perimeter of the property (or a five foot wide strip and six foot high fencing) ; b) redesigns conifer screening on the north side of the parking garage to improve visibility in order to reduce potential for crimes against persons or property; and c) relocates the handicapped access route away from the required landscaping corridor. These revisions are required so that the plan will be in compliance with the City's Zoning Ordinance and in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts to the site and neighboring properties. This plan shall be provided in advance of land use public hearing review, and shall be subject to the . approval of the Planning Division. 5. That the applicant provide a landscaping performance bond, in the amount of $3, 000. 00, to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the protection of the landscaping materials and the landscaping irrigation system. The bond should be provided in advance of the granting of the Certificate of Occupancy, and should be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. mmdoc °Pfi 6 June 1989 ENTp1V SUN 01 'sas City of Renton � Planning Department tlif Ms. Lenora Blauman ® Re: Forrester Office Building Taylor Ave. NW ECF; SA o53-89 Attached are plans and information requested in your letter of May 19, 1989. The following narratives address the issues of the adjacent commercial building and proposed signage. Commercial Building The adjacent commercial building to the east of the proposed Forrester Office Building is a light commercial type of storefront building which fronts on Rainier Ave. and is one story in height with parapets, and is approximately 15 feet high. Currently, the building is uses by two tenants, a clothing store and a marine supply store, and there is one space that has no tenant occupying it. An adjacent commercial building to the south houses an auto parts store, and one to the north houses a truck rental company. These adjacent buildings are also only one story in height. As you can see from the site cross-section, these buildings will have little impact on the proposed buildings views. Signage The signage concept for the proposed building consists of signs in two locations. The first is a low profile street sign located on Taylor Ave. as shown on the plans. This sign would give the building name with room for names of major and minor tenants. The second sign is a building mounted sign located on the east elevation of the building. This sign would be pin mounted to the building and lighted indirectly from above. As depicted in the elevation sketch, it consists of the name of the major tenants product logo and name. The size and scope of these signs is intended to meet the sign requirements of the City of Renton. Further details and dimensions will be provided during the sign permiting process. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 232-6472. R sp t ully submi, e , R chard W. Person, AIA Richard Person, Architect encl. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PavV..s elyvl IRecArlirl DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: ', Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA . 42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° MAMMONISM ONISION CITY OF RENTON 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources Ju0� RECEIVED 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° x ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: il5i Me 4(/ OGG C /4 zG /fad "c . .e.n 7C a0/vim r .r rec'�a74� lee"G•0 e -�,� J'/�ic e rh�K l� e d&lr'gwr/ < `214 t`e ,/-olc-rw We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional ' rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. Vee4e (2, / t ll Signatu o irector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place n TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE -PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN , WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: A-..t f le- leE C,e200 4-/�I APPROVED x APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 40,/•ea,, er/1 a c/do de- /A./4 ve a/-4 Ia.. aic bp, h Gold! f, acc w�42fZ , ffercvre 710 ",GIP "i< it c ..� a" -n v ci �v/Z� J /2av/d ae cc r loc C/ 7 ile AOF .4-4 DATE 1�rj(� li', /fe'? SIGNAT / OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Douuc. . .47). �v/V , DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6 12 8 ECF 053-89 - ,�`9B APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 `C� v, /k� PROPONENT: Richard Person O PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA . 42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° e 15. Public Services ° / ° • 0 16. Utilities ° ° e COMMENTS: �� i J O G�,cC0j 1 C1/L � 0,4-'3 l.L �`t ��VL(�\ • 1./t ov. x�u-� P GI-1/IC-UtA O3 frk-c q-c 4- CAA 6\-u,LA_G1 I bb L .ik,• We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of rector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 T , RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant, property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW. 4th Place n TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU tk, POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNIT' DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVE LR-51ZaUa-(1 Gvt oh Ll o�� u� LI C CA/VW,L pvi,E ouLtou, 12e,0L NcLL a, 4'(A c,v- c-vt_7 6 J cc,,t.c, 6-'17t.r DATE Chr_I SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 AI w REN 1'ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT fJ i(�,^,,' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH . �qy 23 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: re.. \4 ►\CYN `"! DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89, •.; J ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 # 44Qz„ PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: s, Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA .42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet y.c✓o-v --r- zgye) IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . /1/44-c07- ---- . ,?./ /70 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Da e Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place P TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE - PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. Amami means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of 756 is required. q hydrants with a minimum flow of, /aae gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /SD feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within ?aa ' feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes. - All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes )1o No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes `' No DATE 7 „uv9dr9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • .. ,• . • t •-;-;`;LK; 9 ", 144 bni.oAsci 7,51,.:::2;J.;:ui 17:1 i,G(.5f1!;.i7.2i IC; `,; ; :.,'.);;S! 2 1.3.. ri? • d • 1.17.10 • • :•••• 1...11t) r!r5-1,•!1,U;? , •— • Nar1;11 '•:-.).1 ',3;"qt`%2tii • • ?/..C.V.V.: Ci r•• iLfr.);•, 4.1s,q,OL 1.7:C.`o2;Lni4iClij` apt.z.vd COV:e? Cluci • ? - 72.��i,,n /A/Ari y --,(:2''�'-4 . REQUIRED FIR'[ FLOW CALCULATIONS , i 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /CU/ems- 7-&- ' /---G-/c e ,i?/_y'f,. U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS A/- ul. -'/!'" Ian �� FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III V FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) I 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A 1 NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: /U/ 3 /y 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): „ 7.5-- GPM (B 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: — S'-Z d S GPM (C. IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB—TOTAL (B+C): S'z,Z . $" (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) Z I Ss '7 e. 5 GPM (D. 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E: (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON—COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 — 10 25% MAX. NORTH ..6.-'4)l ADD /; % 11 — 30 20% MAX. EAST .5-0 ' ADD /S $ 31 — 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • OS' ADD z'S % • 61 —100 10% MAX. WEST f/»' ADD / % • 101 —150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4—HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : /,5: (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: •4— I L1 Z l . SS 7 5"— GPM (F) r! 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM' (G) - 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) -2,--,„---, (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,030 GPM) *' dI ri (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: GPM (H) /;:j-611. SIGNED: --- f'� e'a LATE ,, ,f-. /7 r 4. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET PL4N C/ N/!;{, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: E-y siine,e_r-i+n 41 DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 qy 2 6 �989 ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 e 0 k A PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: ', Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA .42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° > ° ° ° 2 . Air ° )4 ° ° ° 3 . Water ° X ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9. Housing ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° . . ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° k ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: p 7 / We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise a d have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional inf rmon is needed to properly assess this propos 1. - -4/-/Icc � _14k ii ,sly/ y' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-i zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: )( ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: /-67/4/1 �G- APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS X NOT APPROVED ��cJCFMir dcl� G "ayoi i4/c L e./o� Dom/ 7T2 /w,a/ge7 ,V7 5 C_ G� �:-.� � DATE 710/7 SIGNATURE OF DIREC OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 r : : RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: / L D C/ DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 2 s 'C r98s ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 MANNI GDNWJON ei �J CrTY OF RENTON U , U PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building JUN 1 21989 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site pl` o for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA .42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° ° ° 2 . Air ° z; ° ° 3 . Water ° % ° L o ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 0 o O ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing 0 0 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare v.. ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation " ° 15. Public Services ° �� ° ° 16. Utilities ° I% ° ° COMMENTS: Off-site improvements would include the following: • Curb, gutters and sidewalk fronting site • Pave unpaved half of the street on Taylor Ave. NW. • One street light required per City standards near north property line overhanging Taylor Ave. NW. Contact Traffic Engineering for installation standards. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Aut rized Representative to Rev. 6/88 • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately :7400 square foot office building (with surface and .underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT • OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: Traffic Engineering / 9 9 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Off-site improvements would include the following: • Curb, gutters and sidewalk fronting site • Pave unpaved half of the street on 'Taylor Ave. NW. • One street light required per City standards near north property line overhanging Taylor Ave. NW. Contact Traffic Engineering for installation standards. � D Dt/jv DATE �� cs SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTH IZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 /� �/ o� RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT C, ,_ ��N//�/ f "to 'i1ti'/s/ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEWS ' 1 , RF*TON rV ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 �'eel 1989 l� eO PROPONENT: Richard Person ke & PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION e PLANNING DIVISION • SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH COND IONS eNOT APPROVED ,(lit SEPARAUI wet ?IAA i $AHI1ARs( SEWER 'RAH 'CO MIE. € ti? UApicE 10111 !UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT rD9 taRRE:Nc eft V5 `oo6S i 57ANPAR.o5 rott ExTEAsioM' ac -'- I I" w A'r*PL ' S 6 W 1EA, 5 4'31" P1. LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-WATER � AO _ LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-MIEN I NO I SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER ! `.i A Si'.,fir,.X/;1l00 4 A elf. 49.®e 1 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE yE1, ER, , :04 S.Q. -- x /;�00 4. #736. a0 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA f'.I=-WATER p ti } '`It7g. 92 S L ASSESSMEUT Ah E." C=.7.-SEVJ'En NC) APPROVED WATER PM RE 4ti e ' APP AE0 SEWER PLO RE Quo te d PROVED FIVE IlitEiRAL.". L. ,..f3 yes i �� I 6V FIRE fl:Tr. I, Ci. i,_.7 r.:::IDS:S MAY a RE6uietp AO i 464fL if..07 DATE 2e --g SIGNATURE OF iID CTOR OR A IZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 d d s'- 2V aae.,-t.. s-. f - g9 Ca. $ • 2c- et/ o&U- - to -/a a 89 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (1+11 A'1:c.1 DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: s, Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-i zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA .42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air 3 . Water 4 . Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9 . Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities ° V COMMENTS: REG(uiR.e 6XTENSioWS 0r f)0511H4 CI Y 3 WA'[VL # SA TAPI SEc ,t- IH ellAr t 'TV SCLUE St4E•5 Fet 'DEv E LoP EMEu1 . C63. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. akk -4� .5- 2 tt L 7 Signature of Dir or or Auth•`Oi 'ed Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT /(;!! �'/�� C ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET '9r ' ,' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 5'tovrn ,jg� 9 DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA . 42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air ° 3 . Water 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° e ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities COMMENTS: SGL Gor►'� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 5/32/�� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT )C OTHERS: alDryv- L-c{/ COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED VPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 7 etifi'o,r1 rely ra-wo,13 (mJ'! Jle �Ja sfd OnSC'S /17dr�yvV)1 d� C�;wrrl4✓ Hy014(0 va0 I 41-24 (PI' /D ear Satire,e//D yea✓ racers(' trRd-e , Tde ev.!-( p� 06f D n Ur ci.es S'ro r 4-t r..-kase re, v✓ I 1 )1 o I e-, GCS `f�i-C'. o✓t-F(ow (7'1 et Z yeor cl es ,sforry, -,�yDoVary, ros;,) S--cd A-1."4elf(0.1 67h`I rp rie4sorcS, wrI'; .ke aniu 5-°cd .adi. �S' �lP� ✓�s f{ Q r � p)ln S')h r T h c p i) Wa+�r fef .�,+or of n-d J L►e Gt II ,6 e_ if �J�r 7 o:1/2vo e,- S A✓p-f-pr {✓ Cr l a 44,0 toll s71GHQq GvdS. !pc_ b e .dz-. 4-Le- s ft.ruck d v� DATE 5/ 3/?/r) SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET P CNN/NG REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: b►�.•�d1Y/ O M O'�9FN�/s/ON DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 f qy 23 TAN 1989 ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 �O v , l'i PROPONENT: Richard Person 4S PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA .42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing 0 . 0 ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-i zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place A TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: o , APPROVED x APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED doJ/A5 6, S ,,,J /Yl -4 j 1-, [,,) 2 cc-S c__,Ae- - 2, i -1- (1 - .1 7 / cam er ,--,C:-- DATE c5-77:- . 1 --1 � SIGNATURE OF DIR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE / REV. 6/88 ir RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: axv-erSr (P6m\VI • DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA .42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air ° 3 . Water 4 . Plants ° ° _ 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities COMMENTS: yvl ocierO D DN5 54t1A, syx - c.u6Nui"i o I3O►'J iD (66 r-_Q u I12cc i C,R,fzr of PARKIN Lori IO P sr is ivcrt T-o x 16c/6 suo p6 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Oe-PA. T �� - 15--?_ei7) Signature of q rector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 IL RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION _ PLANNING DIVISION 1 X SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: NU[k&l10 1= L, 4 1'3 JIck* m aq APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED j6 S CTIQ 4-7 i 1,c,(D,9)Z , ► 1 - 1�` o l.)isr io cApfruc (D' 1 'd&H P it), 1-1+E uo-is i C� -rui6 50014 (e-51L1v ,.0 � 6-v c ► ) IDprl ` i `Z��V Pa'U4� comPP tit st GP 1--I�100( Gf \z-11- D sou-rii 15 1'UG? fiU 205 u) ITN) eV S11� S[C��► I�j S.u). CiO R.i 2 c,�-' S}�I'6 Lcc' i.- I K V_. ` u %- U ry I-irc o L,rn U, I/WJ10Lt rvltr�, T f p SI C1 en d Q "I DATE � J`45 SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 , " REhi,./A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: q FIZAITNI PLANNING DATE CIRCULATED: 5/22/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/12/89 O/�OFRFNIONiv N ECF 053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 053-89 MAY 2 E c 5 „ PROPONENT: Richard Person 71 � 8g p� PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building I�� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue N.W. between N.W. 4th Street and N.W. 4th Place. SITE AREA .42 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) : 7400 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5 . Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° e 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services e 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: :use � �i -c.eai---49-- 6-wp7 e2" r----""? '' ''7rie7l_''� a �-e -4��--�`—a4,--4 z-42_. 'c Qom , e9Z ��z---eeee.---; -i---249-c—e -c-- -1-e____ Oe -666,54-e-e---,,e-i />_-e..4.- ----4-;___Q_. --,e--yke_W,=--zk/4-e-c_Ce-s". We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are wh onal information is needed to properly assess this proposal . if _ . e_____.: cc-7 Signature of Direct r or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 • ` RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-053-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-053-89 PROPONENT: Richard Person PROJECT TITLE: Forrester Office Building BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place A TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 12, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED CKAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVE 2_ DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 of Rem T � 0 Ci 0 z NOTICE .a 09,0 6 0,9„Eo SEP1„ • OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D E S C R I P T I O N • . FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-053-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking)•on vacant property in the B-1 zone. • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: TAYLOR AVENUE NW BETWEEN NW 4TH STREET AND NW 4TH PLACE PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE -REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION - - — CERTIFICATION • — t ' SGALe 1.______, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 • '. ` ME ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN COPIES OF • • 'LACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON CUN'SPICUOUS • • ATTEST: Subscribed end sworn to before me, a NotaryPublic 4; n efld fore State of Washington " residing in • , on the �` day of �� _li� SIGNED : E OF RF U Z c3TicE 0 _ 09,0 0 9�TF� sEPTell' • OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D E S C R I P T I 0 N' • FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-053-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. GENERAL . LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: TAYLOR AVENUE NW BETWEEN NW 4TH STREET AND NW 4TH PLACE PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION A IFICI RTAL INTELLJGENCE,INC A' � ��' P.O. Box 569 Renton, WA 98057 0569 ARTIFICIAL J,'— ' INTELLIGENCE,INC - P.O. Box 569 Renton, WA 98057-0569 ([ ',..5:! .tti= Ste__ - _ __ 2 t 4._ i - ^S :- S„,....._,..,.....„,,,,,,.„,;._:,,,..„,„•_.....„.„:;.,;..,.:,..„.,....1 .....z , „ . , -T. ) . ._, . ......? I-- ,. nJ.• . : . cui A -,.., .. 1 l) -- 1 N, (D ,_ t: :.„ .. • . ._ c........ (—__ _ _ __ _,...._„_• N.. .... • _._ _ , ., _ te:- l Z C - - J -',2,---37:-:--i."i,,-' ',."':::-.:f.".z.,';"t„'it''.ei"*.=V'.-`-'4"-tirril I ,'e — ('N. ' 4 J „te a rr. .- ton, WA ARTIROAL INI-m ---,___, , : I 69 Ren,,LiGm..9,0 _ ),. Box ARTIFICIAL56 __=____.----- .. . . ., P.O. Box 5 `-'\ILE,INC. 9—R7---1- --NnTtoFn11,1G\N----7 0569 .*-ENCE,INC __ .. . - °L)0/-0569 .•: . , . . ..„_, ....., • . :.- ,,. :4.--------..›,s---...._•,--..',...,'.--r-e'57-.2,”..,--r.,-.1,.,....-..-,z,- --Z.,-7--,•_';-.,.77-'• ' =-F,-,,,,,,,i,",,-,7.-..-,:-.,-.,,,,A.:,,,,,-7:-.,:-.'7:*,`,-,,,,-,..j.j.J P.J-Jr'_=,-K- J....,-_*.j'tir-'j'-j•-•-',.•:-...:',j2-• - ! • •, .• - *' " J r -. - .-. - . • .- „- _ . , .. ._. , * , 1 • ' ..' . i -' *•." •- l ••••-•,*-'-,-,-,1-:'-''7'C--2*7*.jj'-'-il*,•••''.--''.1‘;*•"*"j*:'-'-*--''''-'j'''''',...j' j '''.--.. i •.--,?:f, **:r-'' ':''-.*:j,*-j* JJ:-,*i.?-:'''."- - . (1 , . . . . • _ . • • _ : . . • •—• •• • , c\-, - - , _ , •.• ..._, „,,....., ,„-_,.. . r . .,,,,,,::..,.-::.,-....,:,..-,:,,..1.j.:-..V.,,,J.;.,--,..."I.,,..j:.:,,-::::;••,*.I.j.c,-:',.1.,--,J-7.•4*. ZJ'jt'l CC.1 ••,....,_ b -.. N —. .s"'".....- , : - - • ov, ris,? I Z --rc'.' ',-:• - ....:.--'1..":--',....::.,, ..,":',',7-;'::-7:::74.7.:Et'',.''r.:!-,7,:7-:--::.'.?..k,4 F., I _ . . -.4-,.., • _ . __...... ,....„,....._::,_.,,,,i„,,:::,,,....._..,•:. ,,,,..,„.:_,:_-...,,,.....,, ... „.._ ...: , :,_f-,r,7*J*--,J'''*.,-,•::-.,*..-77.A._2.:5*-1•*:'?f*•*;'...;•••':*•:',*,.7:*-..,4:1-?__,I-r.r.*:- ....:-:._j,'.--J,5 2'...,-7'.).:.*,:--,,';-..„'57,.-..,.:*.:1"-.•:,-",....,.:,:'-?-t..:,-,•-1 ‘-7' •••+ , ri" ...j.- , .. . i ,::::.,'-.:-. F7- 7.:,-.ci:-."---•:;-'.zt':.::',:::-.---s: -'. -- '" , 4-1'.. (-..r ( '() ,---.---,:::7-...:,:z.--, '-',..--,7%-,;•'!..,..---,-_,..-.,..-..--- .'.::,-;:-.---' -..:",.*:•,.-- - CN. 1 , .,- III .,,T.-:-..,,,:P:c..:::-.,.. i . N..) ,-- _ .:. 7,:.:::,-,--,:-;_:.,...:•,,,,,:,_,•-,,,;-:,,,,,,,,,...„,•,•;:,...i.,.,--_,,,f-,.. u-s, .- :::-.--:_•...::,:,,,,. .:. „_,.., ......1 ...•:,_:-:,,,,...,.::::•:,•-,-;.;-:•,,,,:-.--2,..-.:::-,),,,,:,,,,:,-----;_-„,-1.,-'5;-.: _.. __,:_,....,•_•.-„,„:2,-.-_,.,_,:,:„..„:;•,:r.„:„:.:,•,.:•,,,,..„7...::•;,•,;,,,,,•;§•e:,,,,,:,,-1,y,, \D q) :-.,..-•-•,,,_„:,•_:-,,,_:_..,:v.,:-.-...„--;,:-,,-,:-.:,g,....-„,„„,,..„.„-,.::, (,,,,, Lit. . (\.; I .,,,,,..;„..„,,_,,,,,,,:,-,-,----__.;,::. —_, (1, „•,.......... ,,,,: ,,..:,..„,,....„„„,......„:•—,,,,.,. -,,,,,,,..,5-,_ ......." • Li\I r.... R.-:*S-t-..--::',---r:+4:ii--:!-rF.-q,:-i-?:,;;,i. .T:44t,z - .-:,'":;,;..-, I ..a;.-4;rj.7 ._,,§-.:-.4:4- .4'0;0-0til--St-IX'!"."'-''Z,Y4*-` • .1/4.1 N. '7:::''-;?-,-s.;::,,:-.;.i.::::::.".:::?2.,' .',1,:lris.. -...!-,':, g'!..,,:g';.,•-.:,j7:7.1i..... I Nr _ ,.--.:::::-,_;':::T:1,-,7!*:::,'--.".-,1'..:,;--:f.-'-'--•--.'' C'. l •r . ' .- • . , . -. ..- . : 4 •••••, .- , ......-::'''',;:'"1,:-.....i-....-S•:-::i'f:':-.';'::..";'•._";:f.....'.f.t..1-.1a-.:.',7•F'-'::'..:,4 I . Cs\ :,-.,...,:-....,:..,:,;,::-.2.:;,:;-..-..,.;.,.....;:-........„,,,,..,„.•••'`-‘-...,:f..-:--.....s-st...,:.-:-..,....,-1,..,-' — • - - - -• ... j.-• / 17'k.A.. 1 Nj -__....:-. --..-. • . -- -•---_--f -. :::41::::.."-:.,,:','..1'.:::.,',..,-t.=;:.:.1.:'.5-..":.'.. .-;7'.77:::::•-.: '.-._-.-=-....:',:.:', ..-.1'..-:'-' —• S''''''2":;-.-4-;';'' '''-i.'':•0:.7...4 -.i.--',Fa*t4.: 7;4-;:i.i.;'.'"?';.'ii.--'''''...---';.;. :-.' / -..---.- _,,,z2,z,.....-:7;•::77';,`,:',..,T.',--7,-';'.2,-7-7_,--.,---_,,:-,.---...,2..-.._-,.,..::-i..-_,.. s„_...„... ,_ . :•• I 4,', ''''• ---,1 t\.:•... -1;' gli _,:3-;a77)Ca i =, r'''`Igt-:-.1-riic,--471,:...,;:^-i--,..F'.:,r-AV.7.,:.!?7,,,:-7,- .7,-;;.77,;.:-.aT.r.I.,,.'",z,•-,---„,77,...K--,-;`'.,-.7- _: __ 1 I Z. J. , :;-•-7-•;.2.-__--*It' C.JW j ***" -_-:*,,,j1.,..',f j7,-,...V.J.7g'J.JJ.7-4%,..;JL--*-`..'Jj'ii,,-*:J=•••*:.;*,::7-71-,.,7.41,7.77-,.:.'-,74:,----, ,-',7,-,,,, NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals! DESCRIPTION: FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-053-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. I GENERAL LOCATION: Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed at I the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. I I , \. - i \ \ \ \ \„......._c_st...x.,i. 43 ' SAD V)g .ii , Jil S �SP15‘ � — — A-'^ , r I'• �.: . . %` 1.1-11. ,..,6 ..1., s rr,,,, -7 ii. . i__112.129%1Tgki 5 ul t - -- 9t. ..El I uJ I 1 -,,t. i--- % 1 . 15 1 -- 1 \ I , I I .P 1 1 1 ---- - ----N W 44 4-k ST 9 1 \ I - - \ \ . - - - - -- I L • • • D D Es--EN 11 D u r ` _ d[- qa I,OtO"naa..-„..aaai 1na....,. .. il, .,..,*,,o, ,, 4„.,,,..„ o I— d"10441,1) a PROJECT MIRRSTIVE ' I \ il.l W a • ` _ K�.a " w en a Weil i 7 C %_�'fr�i a W rhfaT t calls for the develapaent of a B-1 somd Piece of ~ (0 I I I:V+ I I: , �� m • • alder and poplar tree a major tree sn~ne L V�� •._m:��.'��: �•%�� 't' '� , 0} I Q ..n !lr•.en►n�i� t, t4:.1�.-: It �a'�• � R� mrp.`vn,as rentalof the.free Po�n<north 1..parking.re. Q Y I _ .)ef�i2�:�'��i i�:(..0 aiatul.v] .e i!:/MQwftSWI U..t i Ci �� C.0:AW:. U Q vlla truck corner rc®pan:.to`"ets.ne Is we existing rr•ent , 1^I ;Mt I Q !'_ .tom.w i iG.::a:rQi.W'• n a t west isealatfv8 \- I�`; I / m VW�QV VQV Q\/,vvvv— • ©uuu _ rQvt•Dufldlnp m set `" �� ,� .'-(. I ¢ P 00�00'000' rr T,e proposed structure will consist of two floor.of office -- rN^'T 2 �.I LAND I' ' —7 apace aver•bee sen stucco utilized fa oa6orsge. Build. 1P 7 -1--ma--I I mlg,�M1E pZ AP✓ PLAN I=2a m0 1 <....le lmunportion rL w f concrete Iwe wood dml built. r in inn n. D lARR OI-�i�ND 3 1 nklef`"pees.. 1 n of the roof inn.1n• roonneto erleeld Z%` ' (� K I RjR'T N ■ 14d46.. ►tee VESA u+a/ Gw+a"Y TOG Iwo�.Neae�G :VCR,.: •..YLA•a�e MPI.M..sang._ z on building will nave•neat imp mac M e.with groma`Da` 9F .....J.4 y� µe S I Z •e®red capreawr ryuapaem. Scale of the rtr structure will M ■ D, DII . I\ t [� Z ®C1PDwM� 1hG D VACT.g a• edyntaML •Bi&C R1i o..e� D'_Lev t,oraNpeyyl, pPW� rnadmtaa n cn.r.aer to.lane well m the neighborhood. v Rd1\ 4 wrt.og for tee project all x mu.. l� AR. I n SMA6{. •X/'(,G DC1O tn.La Tate_feC Darting and under Wilding s h n; I� } 7 3 �� R: / �K.' VL®o.GQAa H9 Gf MK u 1+a 3 rt.. Tine f.possible sae to[ .lope of the site. '[7 E �=g. ..T (�' me.c..a Ie car the project is t tart eone[mc ran f the ,Nw 4 T I H I 1 E Y /'�� ' �'� ''a.� YRer_Id¢/upx'MN GGLOQ: 6.7'de• what-MARG, iyy�wG" W Z numer ofaIWO an complete construction In the winter In Rgv-vow p }l f •'t nepuN xsw.e cv[te4¢swwj IOW/F C..leaa.ra•'a••.nuy: G'•7' R/6[ nNe,c ja Z y0 • This of ambitious •owner. schedule but 1.`pa•alnle anal.eeta ins 1 i. 'I L 2 '+•e- i(IhT7tW mrjlpC.e sx.R.ee, 1 Jj{1iy ii-11 § . • requirements•n a owner L h © l,o.elE�lY4E G1C69ee.e./•J6aL8 RiZ araeCeJ Nec4e: howirEc, Ft op7QA,AA6A7g0011.1, 64AL. 1_i/A L lY LPL.D'SCRIPIICi DIGNITY /AAP 'L -• I !1+ -- . I-skb '6.jo2 m M601U11 6:rne WCR4ee.e...osaje,rage 9YYJI..AA4: Aaa...,m1,2,"a VIAJQ/.M.M,Sa tD0060.safrJ 54M. iie�� 'g J 7L lots:.Sa Volumeed In r la,and 15 of Block 1p,Iatacai a late Part addition as ` IS of Plats at page 6J.records of ling Cow..I...6ton.Situate in the City of Renton.WMingtan. 5FtesT IN6X 6 hfMue xnne.e- evea4acau .5neeie fo4 sews'.: s sec.. AZAL A,e lerrD.nn...l,rOPMUC e uaasra • I. LOag—•J'iEG;' S. NWIN F1[bR PLe.r.1 .14a `JII -� _ 2. 517 E PLNJ es) og.pep-- r.-4 I I t--"1 d1ER4,2ca., loaDO(L •9 ZGA(.' ILGY, 8aun0, (.At.EiVL1El2, MEPT'N i7+e D LA,11-Prm P..AIw1 -1;)i:iaq e;.6vAT l,a.l. LJ { Evte'ie.eou 4aruNn-•1ro rva_ am,64N4/Guts. .e R57e r` m'oc. IvY, oc'eits,wiry 1- . 4)LAVE-Mtn.Pa..I t) b-Cris at_r-VA?IOC I MAY I.1[vJ I AMY I'M • 01 iL '-I\ R UAGAk1T L.N.1D :1_- �.___ , N' • to ago r. Id i0 r [ 2 (; ,, 0 1- o 3 Ilene' I 'I:/ '� .�L R�e Ui� O �! { I W W Jccw U " 1 • •/o I •tt r / d.41:4 1; IuN-a t:,f•, --TIi ' I I a . 3 n t it.' I- (j I `'q•l U I•�'I 65' II�.G{arM WATL/- 'I l� I : I j ^2 G %1.GWI LING�,�I — m ` l y Y • w7/EOT•� VN�9TOK/@.K { 0 2 _ [.CANE, L V.'��L FAN 1.."-IWAI.K Line i`I 2 _ ( __ a . 1 ,�� o , I Y1t _,, bi+ � , i •u. �I �Opl'I i 0 Q s Pdw 4I fEs. loI sTA� i ..P FAaKINar� Q U , <, I� JJ L i i 6 I,ll ' I I I - • to rraee5� U Q ' I Wig,-' 'YI mat,,. rrt I e i , ,11, I I _U Q ,, I `�'77--.. I _ L Imp L l• i ;•S = WORTH • e l '* 1- zp �'✓ p 6= ,j•. o ICI _ 'I , aw'P- 6.fx,2W-1'R� �� oo t- c _— O 5 i 5 der IT� f�AN h^-2o' c .-z' \ - 4 g i 1u o cc 1 -e ggt QAFKII44 fix. • 3aa.yrnu.o. ,1- \ Z 3 i 1-Z Y \ 1•ARKINv vaDN DED.• 34 4/TI.t�F 1 \- RI •.�j ZZ iJ1 j • I N e i ,T�zRCZ�M. F w N l' M 8.)d a� ,...., ._,,.. _ WINI�� I MAY MeP) —C--I w� _j,,A Y 1.)tY, „ 0 CITY OF RENTON ..LL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 19, 1989 Richard Person P.O. Box 156 • Rolling Bay, WA 98061 Re: Forrester Office Building Taylor Avenue N.W. ECF; SA 053-89 Dear Mr. Person: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the 'Technical Advisory Committee on June 21, 1989. Prior to the scheduled evaluation by the Technical Advisory Committee we will need to have the following additional materials: 1. Full-size site plans and related documents. 2 . A cross-section of the property (from Taylor Avenue to Hardie Avenue) which illustrates grade differentials. 3 . A statement and/or drawing which describes the design and use of the commercial building to the east of the site, and a cross-section which illustrates the relationship between that building and the proposed Forrester Building. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Richard Person Forrester Office Building May 19, 1989 Page 2 4 . A narrative which clarifies the proposed signage plan. If you have any questions, please contact Lenora Blauman, of our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/mjp cc: Michael Forrester 1522 N. Brooks Renton, WA 98055 Aimm- ZONING DIVISION PLAN CHECK WORKSHEET APPLICANT: I`11ECG V.-rester ADDRESS: 1522. lj. BYcollSlRenta►n, WA q£?osS PHONE: 271- 8633 PROJECT NAME: Forrester 'Bldg, LAND USE ZONE: Corr►rr,cYc►a` BRIEF DESCRIPTION: fippl'1calnt seeks stte Ptah appreva.l to cc,Kstru.ct " aPQY610.14a1e1 E. 77 100 sc�,�rt, ?YocOSS ioha� 0�1"9►ce bL.0 � I al►n , DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Required/Allowed Project Okay a. Density N�/4 b. Lot Size N/A c. Lot Width N/A d. Lot Depth hi /A e. Setbacks 1. Front lb' 2. Side D 3. Rear 0 f. Special Setbacks g. Height 415 h. Lot Coverage G5 7o +67o i. Signs j. ` Landscaping/ Screening _ k. Irrigation 1. Parking/Loading • Required Parking Stalls 32. Vtota1 tot'a.1 • Compact • Handicapptd • • Driveways (width) • Loading Areas • Aisle Widths m. Recreation n. Bonds E.R.C. CONDITIONS , Satisfied . Not Satisfied HEARING EXAMINER CONDITIONS Satisfied Not Satisfied COMMENTS/RESOLUTION OF ABOVE Reviewer Date F9RM 210 --•.y,.. ..i,u Y ,:��Y• o .'ITY OF REND \I FILE NO(S): S3 6 • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -05 -< Ni_v MASTER APPLICATION . NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) ore to be completed. . .(Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if 'necessary.) APPLICANT 1 TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME • Ill 1 KEr FOR(2ESTE Ft ADDRESS I .. REZONE*(FROM TO ) (522. t4• S (� SPECIAL PERMIT* �� ~ CITY [J . _ 1 ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* f��TO{V ' t JA s1- q g 005 EJ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* VI's TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL . 2 - C�Q • �� SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL . No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON VARIANCE* From Section: NAME * Justification Required Rta,,a rj f?e al , ii-rchikesc,f 4.. ADDRESS ' SUBDIVISIONS: fc'. Pax ( SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP P 17_1( 1 (A '?�/ 0 TENTATIVE PLAT • TELEPHONE 0RELIMIIARY PLAT Q FINAL PLAT e '"2I1CP or ( 3Z-4747 WAIVER • (Justification'Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: M1Ke orres-k--- , ADDRESS • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 4.Su-e." Q PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP FINAL TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: 0 Residential Q Industrial Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS Teti LOY A ie �1� . 64044° \ 0 TENTATIVE . EXIST NG USE LL '" PRESENT ZONING • �� PRELIMINARY VQ.�Q/')• r 5- I 1___1 FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: PrrTe /C/Yl4v( OT cL NUMBER OF SPACES: . , 0‘• ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 81 SQ. 'FT. ACRES r AREA: / /8`A4 o ,r 42 -TOTAL FEES �t PbtVie GOIVI,4I AFF USE ONLY -;— ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE P.. Cif UI-PFArr A• DAPPLICATION RECEIVED BY: MAY i Z 1989 APPL CATION DETERMINED TO BE: Fr1' Accepted f ' ' ` 4C, E V IFr IL, Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Init DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 5 11-'16 1 Q Accepted 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On • ' ' By: (Init ROUTED TO: • d f� ui Blding. Design Eng. 0Fire Parks • ' li Police Policy Dev. . , ): Traffic Eng. Utilities ' • .. /A • a • Legal description of property (If more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). • • Lo+s 2, 3, (4) a1A ( 5 f3Iodc 19. La..+ l w`ef-'s ► ake fa-te-le- /TdCGfC -rj e J(i v, asrecur-c�,e0C. 1 h valv�.� . (� c,"�' ' f' frs 'a7f- f t �. ('3, re r-ds CrV vl Co u� WasC f *v\ . t a t '04 '64. 1 • ii 1 • • • AFFIDAVIT- I, ee. Co(' 2 .12 , being' duly sworn, declare that I am []authorized representative to act for the property owner,[]owner of the property Involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the Information herewith submitted are In all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge . and belief. • SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN T BEFORE ME THIS DAY . OF '_ r�L • 19 7Cc�• • . . Ij NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF Win•INGTON, RESIDING AT * a--eee'Cfr • • ( e of Notary Mc) (Signature of O er) • Lam- • (Address) � ed...4/4 (Address) Aittlit • Gad' • (City) (State) (Zip) • (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in • the "Application Procedure." PSMLA Form No.25 Rev. 1/88 VACANT LAND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS.YOU ARE ADVISED TO SEEK LEGAL ADVICE BEFORE SIGNING. Copyright©1988 Puget Sound Multiple Listing Association ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Becember 20 , 19 88 The Buyer, Michael J. &Tsuchino, Forrester agrees to buy and Seller agrees to sell,on the following terms,the property known as/at/near 4XX Taylor Ave . NW ; City of Kenton King County,Washington,legally described ❑as attached Ei.asfollows: Latinier ' s Lake Park add. Block 19 , Lot 2 , 3 , 14 &. 15 • (Buyer and Seller authorize agent or closing agent to insert or correct,over their signatures,the legal description of the above property.) '. ' 1.PURCHASE PRICE. The purchase price is 9/AT y Ti/U c'5 fy/v,o y-Ho//a-.7-- $ -5"6, 000 TAT /U DUO, ,p4,)/j `1 _ 2.METHOD OF PAYMENT. ' Purchaser to pay 20% down, including earnest money and balance . to ,:,,.: . • be paid in monthly payments of $1000. 00 or more including 10% interest. Balance to be paid in full no later than five years from closing :,• ' This offer is subject to buyers obtaining a satisfactory engineering report within 30 days and verification of ability to obtain a building i1,./gj AI permit from the City of Renton to construct a concrete tilt-up building on subject property. .5,c,cA ire T 5/6-A/ 4 ..0 .c=a of T/t'sT r� A/c) �Olz GD,e�v ff. F''/( Th',� 23/1,4 ci [2vE ,c -i I,. building Dowiv . .. Li T, /V o T.E 9/ ..0.o. 7713. C/f 1 ,l?/�.l°E r v • 3.PERCOLATION TEST DISCLOSURE. If the property is located in King County and is not:(a)Served by an approved public or private sewer system;and(b)Is to be Improved for residential or business use;this transaction is subject to Seller delivering to Buyer a Disclosure as to Percolation Test which meet the requirements of King County Substitute Ordinance No. 1490. . •• 4.SHORT PLAT. The property 0 has been ID must be❑is not legally required to be short platted.If it has been,the Short Plat Number is in the'legal description above. 5.ZONING. Seller warrants that the current zoning designation is: CB B-1 • 6.CONDITION OF TITLE. Title to property is to be free of all encumbrances or defects,except:❑none ] None The following shall not be deemed encumbrances or defects. Rights reserved in federal patents or state deeds;building or use restrictions general to the area,other than government platting and subdivision requirements;utility easements not inconsistent with Buyer's intended use;and reserved oil and/or mining rights.Encumbrances to be discharged by Seller shall be paid from the purchase money at closing. 7.UTILITIES. The property is presently served by a:aii public water main 0 well sewer mainEl gas main®electric distribution line❑none of the foregoing.The term"served by"means(except in the case of a well)that a main or line capable of adequately serving the entire property abuts or adjoins the property at some point.NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING,it is the BUYER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY within' 30 days(10 days if not filled in)from the date of this agreement,that any utilities serving the property meet Buyer's needs.If the Seller does not receive written notice to the contrary within said number of days,it shall be conclusively deemed that said utilities do meet Buyer's needs. 8. LOSING OF SALE. This sale hall be ciosed on 2 8 Feb . , 19 89 by Buyers �i o i c c JA//J. �.&ND 24'j _50 ABC/.✓ //I/0 . or such other Closing Agent as Buyer shall designate.Buyer and.Seller will,immediately on demand,deposit with Closing Agent all instruments and monies required to complete the purchase in accordance with this Agreement.Closing may be sooner than said date by agreement of the parties. 9.POSSESSION. Buyer shall be entitled to possession)on closing❑ "Closing"means the date on which all documents are recorded and the sale proceeds are available to Seller. ' • 10.SPECIAL PROVISIONS. PARAGRAPHS 17 through 26 ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF ARE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. • 11.AGENCY DISCLOSURE. At the signing of this agreement,the selling agent represented Seller .Each party signing this Agreement confirms that prior oral and/or written disclosure of agency was provided to him/her in this transaction. 12.EARNEST MONEY RECEIPT. Agent acknowledges receipt from Buyer of$ $1000. 00 in the form of D cashlyfpersonal check; ❑cashier's check;0 promissory note due , 19 as earnest money.Agent shall deposit any check only after Buyer and Seller have signed this agreement.Agent is authorized to disburse the earnest money to the closing agent.If not previously paid,loan and sale costs, including credit report,appraisal fee,and title report cancellation fee shall be deducted from earnest money prior to any refund to Buyer. AGENT(OFFICE): ('.71 Chenaur & Clarke IQ[ft eNo. 3692 Office Ph: 7724900 Home Ph: 772 2121 BY: PRINT NAME: Glenn Williams 13.AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE—AND TIME LIMIT FOR ACCEPTANCE. Buyer offers to purchase the property on the above terms and conditions.Seller shall have until midnight of 22 Dec . , 19 88 to accept this offer.Acceptance is not effective until a signed copy hereof is actually received by or at the office of Agent.If thi offer's n accepted,it shall lapse and the Agent shall refund the earnest money to Buyer. �p BUYER s � Date / zv// / 19 Home Ph: o 7/— . BUYER 1—�- Date• ��d�� 19 office Ph:2 71-8 6 3 3 BUYER'S ADDRESS: 1522 N. Brnnks , Renton, Ida 14.SELLER'S ACCEPTANCE AND BROKERAGE AGREEMENT. Seller agrees to sell the property on the terms and conditions specified herein,and further agrees to pay a commission in a total amount computed in accordance with the listing agreement.If there is no written listing agreement,Seller agrees to pay a commission of As per listing agreement % of sales price or $ to agent. Seller assigns to agent(s)a portion of the sales proceeds equal to the commission.The commission shall be apportioned between listing and selling agents as specified in the listing,or %to listing agent and remainder to selling agent if there is no written listing. If earnest money is retained as liquidated damages,the above sale and loan costs(paragraph 12)and any other advances by Agent for Buyer or Seller shall be reimbursed or paid and the balance shall be divided equally between Seller and Agent.Seller acknowledges receipt of this agreement,signed by both parties. ,C�i N,E lr�fJf.T y, /4/U . SELLER // '`�• �/ ,/��-/ ,L fw�_ // Date �.� — v?v �� 19 Home Ph: - 7�X SELLER ��((("' /1/ CJ �L Date 19 Office Ph: an-5--.1 , '_ PRINT SELLER'S NAMES: SELLER'S ADDRESS: /OS' /-19 e T U ,42 V /gV, A/ ieif/(v ro ,'1 49,9 + 9YD, J Listing Office:/9iIA/45/ .6AA TIli !NC'. Office No. Office Ph: PS. 'P d Itj nnfI,S`(o(yt. 1 rv-w. rJr}�,1 111'!1 15.COUNTEROFFER. If Seller has made a counteroffer hereon or attached hereto,Buyer shall have until 9:00 p.m.on coy(��r p^i ^� (if not filled-in,the second day following the date the counteroffer is made)to accept the counteroffer, unless sooner with+':.n.AcceptdnL�'sh8ut�tgtreffectiv�a Until a signed copy thereof Is actually received by or at the office of Agent,If the counteroffer Is not ao accepted,It shall lapse:0.the arpest mine shall a pfunded to Buyer. swr MAY 1,1 16.BUYER'S RECEIPT. Buyer acknowledges receipt of a Seller signed copy of this Agreement,on .it. , 91989 .i BUYER R C gIIVFP u f►/ F I , �-; r �'], ECF: 05.E-el t$ ® • z City of Renton �U: [sAUs3"�'� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ,917' ED sEPZ'M��P Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer. or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline. and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION. complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs). the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant." and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Forrester Office Building 2. Name of applicant: Mr. Mike orrester 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact.person: 1522 N. Brooks Renton, Washington 98055 (206) 271-8633 4. Date checklist prepared: 3-23-89 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Planning Dept. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): After Site Plan approval, the project will proceed to a construction phase, with construction completion in late 1989. PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON • I MAY 1 2 1989 rlf • • • • 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No ;;.., ,vy,; is 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Just this environmental checklist. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Unknown • _ 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site Plan approval, and building permits. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is for the construction of a professional office building of approx. 7400-SF with its required parking on a zoned piece of property (B1 zone) in the City of Renton. Area of the property is .42 acres. Parking will consist of both surface and under building parking areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of ' area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located off of 90th Ave. S, near S 127th St.(vacated) . This is just west of Rainier Ave. and overlooks the Renton Airport. It is right behind the Auto Parts Store and Budget Rentals, which are on Rainier Ave. The access street (90th) is a dead end street at this time, and the site needs to be approached from the south. The site is currently vacant land. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other gentle slope down to east. • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Most of the site has a 5 % slope with a 50% slope at the very east property lin( c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? if you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Appears to be glacial till. Soils report will be completed prior to construction. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. _ 2 _ . e. Describe tI _:purpose, type, and approximate c tities of any filling or • grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Some filling may need to be done to grade parking area. Material should come from building excavation and should not exceed 300 CY. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. There may be some erosion during construction to the east. An erosion control plan may be provided if necessary. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 65% ± h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: An erosion control plan will be provided if necessary and may include filtration fencing or hay bales to control erosion. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally" describe and give ' approximate quantities if known. There will be some dust generated during construction, and equipment exhaust emissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? Renton Airport is located a short distance to the east. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: If dust becomes a problem, it will be sprinkled, and equipment will be used only during normal working hours. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3). Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give - • general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Rain water from roof and parking area will be connected to storm water sewer. An oil separater catch basin is anticipated to remove surface wastes. Storm water detention system is also anticipated to control flow rate. These systems will be designed per the City of Renton requirements. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other' sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rain water from the roof and parking area will be collected, detained, and discharged into Storm sewer system. This system flows into Lake Washington. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No • - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface. ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water detention system will be installed. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: #.,deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar. pine, other Shrubs o grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail. buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage. other o water plants: water lily, eel grass. milfoil. other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A major portion of the site will be cleared and graded with the loss of most of the Aldar scrub. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. unknown d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Site will be landscaped upon completion of construction utilizing native and ornamental landscaping. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle. songbirds, other . none Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other none Fish: bass. salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other none b. • List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. unknown C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so. explain. unknown • - 5 - • d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. if any: none • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. i Electricity and natural gas(if available) will be utilized to meet building energy needs for HVAC and convenience power. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Could have a limited effect on property to the north, in that building shadow may cross property line at certain times of the year. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Buildings will meet the Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste. that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: none b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation. other)? Traffic noise off Rainier and aircraft noise from Renton Airport. - 6 - - 2) What types .....i levels of noise would be creates or'associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. -Short term noise will consist of construction noise and equipment use during normal working hours. There should be no long term noise generated by the building with only traffic noise to and from the building by employees and clients. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. if any: none 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently vacant land and is bordered by business uses to the east and north and apartment uses to the south and west. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO c. Describe any structures on the site. None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? B1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? unknown g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? unknown h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. unknown i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approx. 25 people j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None - 7 - r 1 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and t, . I projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. , Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None ' b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. , None " c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10:, Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Approx. 36 feet high. Building exterior proposed to be wood and stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Limited views from west to east may be altered of obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What. time of day would it mainly occur? Building and parking area will be lit for security during the evening hours. Vehicles entering and leaving the site during evening will cause momentary light and glare . . f b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? , Unknown. Parking lot lighting will be directed to light site area only, and to reduce glare. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing street lights on Rainier Ave. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None except as mentioned above. — 8 - 1.2.• Recreation • a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Unknown. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on. or proposed for, national, state. or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Unknown b. Generally describe any landmarks or,evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific. or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Unknown c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Primary access to the site is via 90th Ave. S. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? No. Transit routes are along Rainier Ave which is a block west c. How any paqa0 spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Approx. 34 spaces. None would be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Unknown. Possible some improvement to 90th Ave S, as determined by City of Renton. - 9 - I e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or ' • air transportation? If so, generally describe. • Project is located near Renton Airport. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown. Peak hours would be employee arrival and departure(8AM and 5PM) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 1 S. Public Services ' a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currentl available at the site: (MD natural gas e use service _elephone, anitary sewer septic sys ern, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Telephone- US West Sewer- City of REnton Electricity- Puget Power "Provide utilities to building Water- City of Renton during and after costruction Nat. Gas- Wa. Nat. Gas C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any • declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misreprese tation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: /CG4/0ls2 J,e5/1?r4, - 10 c r °.•`D. SUPPLEMENTAL SF FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for, actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals. fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat. historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including - whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: - 12 - PROJECT NARRATIVE This project calls for the development of a B-1 zoned piece of property into a Professional Office Building, for use by Artificial Intelligence, Inc. , and selected tenants. The site is generally sloping down to the east with a steep slope at the far east property line. It is undeveloped with many scrubb alder and poplar trees with one major tree in the southeast corner of the site. To the north is a parking area for a truck rental company, to the south is an existing apartment building , and accross the street to the west is another existing apartment building. l The proposed structure will consist of two floors of office space over a basement to be utilized for storage. Building exterior will be of stucco with wood trim boards in "earth tone" colors. Roofing is to be concrete tile in an accent color on the visible sloped portion of the roof and a built-up roofing material ` on the flat areas. No rooftop mechanical equipment is anticipated asthe building will have a heat pump HVAC system with ground mounted compressor equipment. Scale of the structure will be residential in character to blend well in the neighborhood. Parking for the project will be surface parking and under building parking. This is possible due to the slope of the site. The schedule for the project is to start construction in the summer of 1989 and complete construction in the winter of 1989-90. This is an ambitious schedule but is possible and meets the requirements of the owner. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 2,3,14, and 15 of Block 19, Latimer's Lake Park Addition as recorded in Volume 18 of Plats at page 63, records of King County, Washington. Situate in the City of Renton, Washington , PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 1 2 1989